Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991-03-18_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 18, 1991 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL HRA & COUNCIL FLAG CEREMONY - CAMP FIRE COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF VICTIMS OF HOLOCAUST ADOPTION OF'CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adoption of Consent Agenda Items is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda 'items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of-such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF MARCH 4, 1991 * II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of February 4 and 19, 1991 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Engineer. Public'comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass if improvement had been petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition. A. Sidewalk Improvement No. S -51 - Wooddale Avenue (east side) from St. Stephen's Church to W. 56th Street B. Sidewalk Improvement No. S -52 - West 66th Street (north side) from France Avenue to approximately 400' east to existing sidewalk, also from France Avenue to northwest corner of Southdale parking lot C. Sidewalk Improvement No. S -53 - Cornelia Drive (west side) from Cornelia School to W. 72nd Street; W. 72nd Street (north side) from Cornelia Drive to Oaklawn Avenue III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan ARproval of Property .Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Appeal of Board. of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - Setback and Height Variances - U.S. West NewVector Group, 5600 Lincoln Drive (Continued from 3/4/91) B. RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1. Planned Office District - Lot 2, Block 2, Southdale Acres - Diversified Credit Union, 6525 Drew Av So C. Preliminary Plat Approval - Brennan Addition - Lot 5, Block 7, Indian. Hills Agenda Edina City Council March 18, 1991 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARING'- SALE OF STRONG BEER IN RESTAURANTS HOLDING WINE LICENSES (Continued from 3/4/91) A. Ordinance No: 902 -AlO - To Allow Sale of Intoxicating Malt Liquor at On-Sale B. Ordinance No. 902 -A8 - To Eliminate Requirement for.Bond, Require Sale of Food with Sale of Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor, Update References to State Statutes; Provide Licensing Term of April 1 to April 1 C. Ordinance No. 902 -A9 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 as Presently Amended V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Two Standby Generators * B. Signs - Yorkdale Liquor Store VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Informal Presentation - Lund's Expansion - Tres Lund B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 3/12/91 C. Report on Waste Oil Disposal * D. LOGIS Contract Revision * E. Ratification of Contract - Local 49 Operating Engineers * F. Approval of 3.2 Beer License Renewals * G. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector H. Appointments to Boards /Commissions /Committees I. Appointments to Edina Foundation VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Petition Curb A Gutter with Bituminous Overlay - Wooddale Av between W. 70th St and Belvidere La; West Shore Dr between Dunham Dr and W. 70th-St; Andover Rd between West Shore Dr and Wooddale Av IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL. XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. LMC 1991 Legislative Conference - April 10 XII. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 03/18/91: Total $569,224.06 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 02/28/91: Total $671,227.14 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Tues Mar 19 Annual Council /Advisory Boards Dinner Meeting 6:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhous, Mon Apr 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 22 Board of Review 5:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Apr 23 Annual Volunteers Reception 5:00 p.m. Edinborough -Park o e� CnRHOB 1 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, from 1933 to 1945, six million jews were murdered in the Nazi Holocaust as part of a systematic program of genocide, -and millions of other people perished as victims of Nazism; WHEREAS, the people of the City of Edina should remember the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the hope that such horrors are never repeated; WHEREAS, the people of the City of Edina should continually rededicate themselves to the principle of equal justice for all people; WHEREAS, the people of the City of Edina should remain eternally vigilant against all tyranny, and recognize that bigotry provides a breeding ground for tyranny to flourish; WHEREAS, April 11, 1991, has been designated pursuant to an Act of Congress as a Day of Remembrance of Victims of the Nazi Holocaust, known internationally as Yom Hashoah; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the people of the City of Edina to join with The United States Holocaust Memorial Council in the commemoration: NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, proclaim that, in memory of the victims of the Holocaust, and in the hope that we will strive always to overcome prejudice, and inhumanity, through vigilance, education, and resistance, proclaim that the week of April 7 -14, 1991, is hereby designated as DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST in the City of Ed Mayor United States Holocaust Memorial Council January 22, 1991 Dear Mayor: In 1980, a unanimous .Congress established the United States Holocaust Memorial Council and mandated it to: (1) provide appropriate ways for the Nation to observe the Days of Remembrance as an annual, national, civic commemoration of the Holocaust; and (2) build, with'private funds, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in. the Nation's capital. Construction of the Museum is now underway on the Mall in Washington, D.C., with the opening scheduled for the Spring of 1993. In accordance with our Congressional mandate, the Council has annually encouraged Governors and Mayors across this country to issue Days of Remembrance proclamations and to sponsor or participate in observances. This program has seen remarkable success over the past ten years with every Governor and an increasing number of Mayors participating. The 1991 Days of Remembrance commemoration will be observed. from Sunday, April 7 through Sunday, April 14. The theme, "Fifty Years Ago: From Terror To Systematic Murder," reflects the shift in the Nazi policy toward Jews during 1941 from persecution to extermination. The United States was drawn into war with the Nazis in December of that momentous year. Three - and - one -half years later, U.S. troops liberated the few survivors from Nazi death camps in western Europe. In keeping with the national commitment to Remember, we respectfully request that you issue a 1991 Days of Remembrance Proclamation for your city. A suggested format is enclosed foi your consideration. In the past, many Mayors have presented their proclamations to Survivors, Liberators or Rescuers during a local commemoration ceremony. We support and encourage the continuation of this practice. 2000 L Street NW, Suite 588, Washington, D.C. 200364907, (202) 653 -9220 Also enclosed is a Days of Remembrance liaison form should you wish to appoint someone on your staff or in the community to help you plan a ceremony. If you need assistance, please call the Days of Remembrance office in Washington, D.C.: (202) 653- 9220. r At this time of great national concern, when the events of only a half a century ago are again threatening to recur, let us join together in Remembrance of the victims of the Holocaust and . in dedication to the preservation of the principles of democracy. With every good wish, Sincerely, i enj in Meed Chairman Days of Remembrance Committee Enclosures r O Cn 0 s'��ORPOPT��j/ lase PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Camp Fire, the national youth organization, will be celebrating its 81st birthday on March 17,,1991; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire councils in the City of Edina teach boys and girls self - reliance and good citizenship; and WHEREAS, through contemporary programs and by speaking out on issues that affect youth and their families; today's Camp Fire is helping kids cope with their changing world; and WHEREAS, in Camp Fire, the choices and opportunities are wide open for boys and girls; and WHEREAS, through Camp Fire, young people are learning to develop confidence and to gain skills needed to become tomorrow's leaders; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire is commended for the opportunities its programs offer to young people in the City of Edina and throughout the nation and for the many services these young people perform for their communities through Camp Fire. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby officially proclaim March 17th to March 23rd, 1991, to be in the City of Edina. CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEEK Mayor MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND ARDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY' MARCH 4, 1991 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice., Smith and' Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner. Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve and adopt the BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1991, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the HRA Minutes of February 19, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.., REAPPOINTMENTS MADE TO EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION BOARD Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to reappoint Virginia Shaw and John Palmer to three year terms to February 1, 1994, and Ronald Ringling to a one year term to February 1,'1992, on the East Edina Housing Foundation Board. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve payment of the following BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 3/4/91 and consisting of one page totalling $111,771.13; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 2/19/91 and,consisting of one page totalling $18.388.67. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further'business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 077706 03/13/91 21,284.75 BLAINE HTG.AIR PARK CENTRUM 21,284.75 077707 03/13/91 363.97 BRW INC ENG FEES 077707 03/13/91 3,136.46 BRW INC ARCH FEES 077707 03/13/91 2,140.04 BRW INC ENG FEES 077707 03/13/91 84.87 BRW INC ENG FEES 077707 03/13/91 125.33 BRW INC ENG FEES 5,850.67 kkkkk* 077711 03/13/91 48,420.00 TC CONSTRUCTION PARK CENTRUM 48,420.00 *kkkkk 077714 03/13/91 30.00 GORDON HUGHES REIMBURSEMENT 30.00 * 077715 03/13/91 15,892.88 UNITED MORTGAGE CORP CONSTR INTEREST 15,892.88 * 077716 03/13/91 2,000.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PARK MAINT 2,000.00 * 077717 03/13/91 12.16 DEPENDABLE MESSENGER SERV 12.16 * kkkkk 93,490.46 FUND O1 TOTAL FUND HRA 93,490.46 TOTAL 03 -18 -91 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1319 - 132 -12 61306 01- 1319 - 132 -12 53955A 01- 1319- 132 -12 61313 01 -1319- 132 -12 61305 01- 1319 - 132 -12 61309 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 4206 - 134 -12 01- 4302 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 11517 375 01- 4000 - 132 -12 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 4, 1991 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CUB PACK NO. 123 WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed members of Cub Pack No. 123 from Shepherd of the Hills Church. Michael Semsch, cub leader, stated that the five boys in the pack were third and fourth graders from the Highlands School area and were working on merit badges for citizenship. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion Member Rice to approve and adopt the Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Motion carried. was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Richards *MINUTES OF REGUTAR MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 19 AND DECEMBER 3. 1990 APPROVED Motion was made by Member•Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of November 19 and December 3, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENT - DR. JOYCE ANDERSON - DEFERRED TO LATER AGENDA ITEM John Mooty, attorney for Dr. Joyce Anderson, asked that this agenda item be deferred until the Council discussed Agenda Item IV.A - Temporary Conditional Use Permits. *AWARD OF BID FOR IMPROVEMEN'P NO. LS -11 (LIFT STATION REMODELING) CONTINUED TO 2/19191 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded.by Member Rice to continue award of bid for Improvement No. LS -11 - Lift.Station Remodeling to February 19, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO FAIRWAY MOVERS FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for two fairway mowers for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, North Star Turf, Inc., at $31,808.00 with trade -in. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 112 TON CARGO VAN FOR PARK DEPARTMENT Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for 1/2 ton cargo van for the Park Department to North Star Dodge at $11,028.95 per Hennepin County Contract #1678AO., Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO DEFIBRILLATORS FOR PARAMEDICS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for two defibrillators for paramedics to recommended bidder, Physio Control, at $14,950.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SIK GOLF CARS FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for six golf cars for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, EZ -Go -Upper Midwest,-at $13,700.00 with trade -in. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. i TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.. DISCUSSED: APPLICATION OF DR. JOYCE ANDERSON TO BE RECONSIDERED ON 314191 Mayor Richards stated that.the subject of temporary conditional use permits is on the agenda at the request of a Council Member at the last meeting. Planner Larsen recalled that a public hearing was.conducted on January 22, 1991, on the application of Dr. Joyce Anderson for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Home Occupation at 7121 Glouchester Avenue. During the testimony the question arose as to whether there should be` limits as to the days per week and hours per day that a home occupation could operate. The temporary conditional use permit process now provides that the applicant set forth the hours per day and days per week that the business activity will occur. It does not prohibit or limit when activities may occur. The provision is designed to provide flexibility in dealing with varying circumstances. The requested days and hours of business activity are reviewed during,the public . hearing and may be accepted as proposed or altered or limited by the Council. In granting a temporary conditional use permit, the Council must find that the proposed activity meets the general findings for all conditional use permits and also complies with the performance standards for home occupations. The Council may grant exceptions to those performance standards, but not to the general findings. Staff feels that the flexibility provided by the ordinance as now written is needed. Inserting very specific requirements would likely be . troublesome in practice as each case is likely to present unique circumstances. Member Kelly commented that, although standards for home occupations have to be met in granting a temporary conditional use permit, there should be language in the ordinance that would say the home occupation would operate at hours that will not interfere with traditional family life or school hours so.as to not increase the traffic in the neighborhood during those times. Member Rice stated that he would support the staff-position and that, although there may be unique circumstances, he did not see any reason to,add further restrictions in the ordinance. Public Comment Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the issue of whether the Zoning Ordinance amendment adopted on November 19, 1990, to provide temporary conditional use permits to allow home occupations by handicapped residents should be amended to provide more specificity as to the days and hours of the activity. John Mooty, attorney representing Dr. Joyce Anderson, made the following comments as summarized. The ordinance that had been in existence permitted 10 vehicle trips per week for home occupations. In Dr. Anderson's situation there have been no complaints or problems with the allowed 10 trips. The Council then adopted an ordinance amendment which said that, if the individual were handicapped, the number of vehicle trips per week could be increased to 20. The ordinance was adopted without any reference to when those additional trips or the initial 10 permitted trips could occur. At the hearing on January 22, 1991, the Council considered Dr. Anderson's application and failed to approve the temporary conditional use permit. In effect, what was said was that, even though a person is handicapped and deserves some consideration over and above that for a non - handicapped person, the handicapped person has to agree that all of the visits occur during a restricted period of time. Mr. Mooty submitted that there are other permitted home occupations in the community, such as music teachers, whose activities generally occur between 4 to 6 p.m. If the concern is 'traffic, he suggested that there are many homes in the community whose occupants own three or four cars which add to neighborhood traffic. In the case of Dr. Anderson, there is a high priority to see clients between '5 and 6 p.m. If there are to be restrictions, Mr. Mooty suggested that hours of activity go to 6 p.m., with no more than one appointment (trip) after 5 p.m., and with Sundays and Saturday afternoon hours excluded. This would permit Dr. Anderson, who is handicapped and others who may be in her position, to earn a livelihood and would not impair the safety of the neighborhood. In conclusion, Mr. Mooty asked the Council to reconsider the application of Dr. Anderson for the reasons he had presented. Also speaking in opposition to restricting hours for temporary conditional use permits were Elin Ohlsson, resident of Edina, and Harold Bagley, 7113 Glouchester Avenue. Council Comment Member Paulus asked the City Attorney if, from a legal standpoint, at the time of application the applicant should be advised in writing that the hours of activity will be discussed and considered by the Council during the public hearing process. Attorney.Erickson said that might prove useful but was not absolutely necessary. Member Smith asked what the procedure would be if the applicant would amend and modify her application as has been suggested by Mr. Mooty. Planner Larsen said, as it stands now, the application of Dr. Joyce Anderson for a temporary conditional use permit was denied. It would take a majority vote from the prevailing members of the Council to bring it back for reconsideration. Because notice would also have to be published and mailed to the neighborhood, the earliest date it could be be reconsidered would be March 4, 1991. Member Smith made a motion that the Council reconsider the application of Dr. Joyce Anderson for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Home Occupation at 7121 Glauchester Avenue. on March 4. 1991, with waiver of application fee. Motion to reconsider was seconded by Member Rice. In discussing the motion, Mayor Richards said he had not looked at this as a handicapped issue but as a economic issue and therefore he had not been troubled by the hours of activity and would not support imposing restrictions. Further, he said he would not support the issuance of a temporary conditional use permit as requested but would support this motion for purposes of debate and discussion. Mayor Richards then called the vote on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Paulus Motion carried. TAX FORFEITED LAND (PLAT OF DEfiEY HILLS ESTATES) PROPOSAL CONSIDERED: CITY TO ACQUIRE FOR PARRS, FLOOD CONTROL AND OPEN SPACE, SUBJECT TO PRIVATE CONTRIBUTION FOR UNPAID SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Assistant Manager Hughes stated that the subject property is located in the southwest quadrant of Dewey Hill Road and Cahill Road. On February 20, 1990, the Council was advised that the parcel had been forfeited due to non - payment of real estate taxes. At that time, staff advised the Council of alternatives and following its review of those alternatives, the Council adopted a resolution requesting that Hennepin County withhold the parcel from public auction for one year. The property has been withheld from public auction by the County and will be until February 17, 1991. In accordance with the Council's direction, staff contacted representatives of the Dewey Hill Condominiums, Windwood Condominiums, and Cahill of Edina Condominiums concerning the parcel. Last August staff met with representatives of all the association to discuss the alternatives concerning this parcel. Staff has recently received letters from the Dewey Hill West Homeowners Association, the Dewey Hill East Condominium Association and the Cahill of Edina Association: They request that the City "establish the site of Lot 3, Block 1, Dewey Hill Estates as a natural open space" by a tax - forfeit conveyance of this property from the State of Minnesota. If the City were to acquire ownership of this parcel in this fashion, it would forego collection of all outstanding installments of special assessments. According to City records, these total approximately $58,000. Alternatives The City could agree to acquire the subject parcel by'tax- forfeit conveyance conditioned upon collection of the outstanding installments of special assessments via private donations. Presumably these donations would come. from the surrounding condominiums. The Council could elect not to acquire the property for public purposes. In that case, the County would offer the parcel for public sale, and anyone could submit an offer, including the surrounding condominium associations. -The net proceeds of the sale would be applied first to the special assessments and the balance would be divided among the County, the School District and the City.. The County's appraised value if the property were to be sold is $100,000. Other Issues Recent conversations with County staff revealed -that the County may object to the conveyance of this parcel to the City at no cost. However, that position may inconsistent with the law. Accordingly, if the Council would adopt a resolution requesting conveyance to the City at no cost, the County may oppose the conveyance. Assistant Manager Hughes concluded by reiterating that the one year suspension from public auction ends on February 27, 1991. Public Comment Dick Reichow, president of Dewey Hill East Condominium Association, said that there were a lot of unanswered questions about-the subject parcel relating to road easements and the-tennis courts which they felt the City should have investigated. Roy Smith, president of Cahill of Edina Townhomes Association, stated that the surrounding properties consist of 323 condominiums and 44 townhomes and that all but 20 units are owner occupied. Because it is a high density environment, the parcel should be acquired for open space. Paul Thomas, 7510 Cahill Road and former president of Windwood Association, commented that the subject parcel is a ponding area for storm water from the surrounding properties and that it was important that it be preserved for that purpose. Sara Evans, 7458 Cahill Road and former president of Cahill of Edina Townhomes Association, said that because of the time constraints they have not been able to meet as an association to consider options. However, they have a strong interest in having it stay as open land. Leonard Brink, 7456 Cahill Road, commented that he was aware of the legal ramifications which concerned the Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West Associations. If the parcel were to be left in its natural state it would equate to 1/50 of an acre per housing unit of the surrounding property owners. Although they chose to live in a high density area, Mr. Brink said he hoped something could be worked out so that the parcel could remain as it is now. Barbara Harris, 7434 Cahill Road, brought up the issue of additional traffic that would result if the parcel were developed and urged that it be left open and not developed. Council Comment To focus on the issue, Mayor Richards referred to his comments as noted in the Council Minutes of February 20, 1990. "By approving the parcel for sale it would be put back on the tax roles and the City would get back the special assessment costs that otherwise the City would have to levy for. If that issue were removed, he suggested the City acquire it for open space. To accomplish this the City could propose to the Dewey Hill condominium associations that the City would acquire it for open space if they pay the special assessments that were levied on the parcel when Dewey Hills was developed. They would also be put on notice that the alternative would be to-approve it for public sale. The risk they then would run would be that a developer could purchase the land for a development project to which they may object." What this Council had. said a year ago was that the City would acquire the property for open space if the specials would be paid by the surrounding condominium associations who would directly benefit. Because of the abundance of open space in this particular area of the City, the Council would not be fiscally responsible if it asked all the other residents of the City to share in the cost of acquiring this parcel. What the Council needs is a commitment from the condominiums associations by the Council Meeting of February 19, 1991, that they will contribute to the City the sum of $58,000. Gerald Schilling, 7446 Cahill Road and former president of Cahill of Edina Townhomes Association, said he appreciated the clarification because they had not clearly understood the options. He said he felt that they would respond in a positive manner but may not be able to do it in 20 days and asked if the period could be extended. Attorney Erickson said he did not believe there would be an extension available to the one year period of time the parcel was to be withheld from public action. Mr. Schilling then asked if there were any other options. Mayor Richards said the options were: 1) Do nothing - County would.place parcel on public auction and it could be sold to a private party for development as now zoned and approved for a 42 unit condominium building. 2) City could acquire property and absorb the $58,000 of special assessments that was spent for improvements to the property. 3) City could acquire the property and collect the amount of the special assessments from the 377 surrounding condominium units. Following further discussion, there was a consensus of the Council to acquire the parcel at no cost from the County, to ask.the benefitted properties (the condominium associations) to contribute $58,000 for the unpaid special assessments, and that the monies must be in.an escrow account by February 25, 1991 and if the City did not prevail the money would be returned. Florence Norback, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, asked if a rezoning of the property could be considered if the parcel were sold to a private developer. Planner Larsen responded that the property is zoned PRD -3 and the only plan that has been approved is for a 42 unit condominium building. That is the only development. that could constructed without going through the public hearing rezoning process. In response to a question from the audience, Member Smith clarified that if the associations paid the $58,000 they would not be buying the land, they would be paying off an unpaid special assessment and that if the City acquired it for open space it would be public property. As to procedure, Assistant Manager Hughes,said that the Council should consider adopting a resolution now to be submitted to Hennepin County to affect the conveyance. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, with the' understanding that the City would receive a contribution in the amount of $58,000 in cash by February 25, 1990, from the benefitted properties for the unpaid special assessments: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of.Taa Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Auditor's List "741 -NC ", said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0214 - Parks, flood control and open space. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: ' Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. SALE OF STRONG BEER IN RESTAURANTS HOLDING VM LICENSES DISCUSSED: PUBLIC BEARING ON ISSUE TO BE HELD 3/4/91 Manager Rosland recalled that at the Council Meeting of November 19, 1990, the Edina Chamber of Commerce had requested that the Council consider adoption of'an ordinance amendment that would permit on -sale wine licensees, who also hold on -sale 3.2 beer licenses and whose total sales are at least 608 attributable to the sale of food, to sell strong beer without an ' additional license. The Council had asked for further information on the issue which staff has now provided, i.e. relationship of alcohol content in beer and wine, and the advisory poll for on -sale wine licenses taken in November, 1984. The cost of an advisory vote would have to be paid by private entities as was done in that election. Warren Beck, 4421 W. 52th Street, stated that he was representing the Edina Chamber of Commerce Board and was also speaking as a business person and resident of the community. The intent of the discussion is to discuss the process by which the Council would consider the issue of sale of strong beer. He pointed out that 1) The change in the ordinance to permit sale of strong beer would provide a positive. benefit to the long term health of the retail business in the City. Such change would expand the number of restaurant operators who would consider a location in Edina. It would also allow existing restaurants to provide a full service menu which would improve their competitive posture. .Restaurants contacted indicated that their wine sales represent about 28 of their business and that the sale of strong beer would not increase that amount significantly. The. primary benefit would be that Edina restaurants could carry additional brands of beer which are not currently in the non - intoxicating classification, i.e. imported and premium beers. Mr. Beck said he had interviewed three beer distributors in the metro area who confirmed that non - intoxicating beer contains alcohol at 3.28 or less in volume. By definition, intoxicating malt liquor contains more than 3.28 and ranges from 3.38 to 4.58, or an average of 4.08, with imported beers about the same as domestically brewed beers. Assuming that average, a 12 oz. bottle of beer would contain approximately 1/2 ounce of alcohol,and, assuming an average of 12.0% alcohol in wine as typically served in a 4 ounce glass, the wine would also contain approximately 1/2 ounce of alcohol. Restaurants in Edina that were interviewed indicated that, typically, customers order one or two glasses of wine per meal.. It would appear that the alcohol consumed is not a significant amount and these restaurants estimated they would expect beer consumption to be about the same. In the advisory poll conducted six years ago, Edina residents voted in favor of wine being available in restaurants. Had strong beer - licensing been available at that time as part of the wine licensing process and been included in the polling process, it is felt that the result would have been the same. Licenses for 3.2 beer have been available in Edina for many years and, if this were a significant issue in the community, it is unlikely that'the advisory referendum would have come out as it did. As to process, Mr. Beck said he understood that there has been discussion as to whether an advisory referendum should be considered again. That issue has been addressed by the community and there is no indication that the attitude in the community has changed. The public hearing process would provide an opportunity for citizens to speak their minds, to offer suggestions and to contribute in other ways that simple voting does not and would give the Council the public input they feel is necessary before making a decision. Attorney - Erickson clarified two points: 1) There is no statutory requirement in connection with the'issue before the Council. If an advisory vote is sought, the election cannot be funded with public monies. 2) Adoption of the ordinance would allow the sale of strong beer to holders of wine and 3.2 beer licenses whose gross sales are at least 60% attributable to food, without further licensing by the City. Mayor Richards commented that, although the City has come down-a long path on how' we deal with intoxicating beverages, had the issue of strong beer been addressed in 1984 the election would have come out the same way. His position would be not to have a referendum on this issue as ample input'could be obtained by holding public hearings, following which the Council could consider adopting an ordinance to allow the sale of strong beer. It should be publicized that this issue would be heard on March 4, 1991,.with the intent that no formal ordinance be considered at that time and that the hearing be continued to March 18 for action. Member Smith made a motion setting March 4, 1991, as the public hearing date to obtain community input on the issue of amending the ordinance to permit the sale of strong beer as provided by Minnesota.Statue 340A.404,'Subd. 5(b). Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. WILDLIFE COMMITTEE REPORT GIVEN Assistant Manager Hughes stated that, in accordance with the Council's request, a staff committee was comprised to study wildlife issues in Edina'. The focus of their study was wildlife /human conflicts. General Findings 1) During calendar year 1990, calls for service /advice concerning wildlife comprised 27% of the animal control calls. 2) Wildlife populations do not present a significant public health risk to Edina's residents. Likewise, no evidence was found that the risk will increase in the future. 3)' No evidence was found that controlling Edina's deer population, or any other wildlife population, will have any effect on the risk of contracting Lyme disease. Animal Control Services Animal control efforts focus primarily on domestic animals. The City does provide some services relative to wild animals: a) Ombudsmen and referral service for wildlife related questions, b) assistance in removal of certain wild animals, and c) removal and disposition of carcasses of road kills from public property. The City does not trap and remove "nuisance" animals. Live traps are now available for rental from private services and several small businesses will remove nuisance animals for residents. Goose Removal Project Last summer the University of Minnesota completed the fourth annual trapping and relocation of Canada geese in Edina; two years remain on the contract. This program has been successful in stabilizing goose populations in the City and should be continued indefinitely to maintain stable populations. Findings on Population Control of White- Tailed Deer 1) Population control of deer can be accomplished only by killing individual animals. 2) Attempted population control in Edina alone would be of very questionable value. 3) At the present time, neither Hennepin County Parks nor the City of Bloomington is pursuing'a population control program in Hylands Park. 4) If a program were pursued in Hylands Park,'the most feasible methods of population reduction in Edina would be realized through sharp- shooting by marksmen employed by the City or another agency or by trapping and killing animals. 5) At the present time, the policy of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is that deer population control is the responsibility of the cities. Artificial Feeding Artificial feeding of wildlife is a controversial topic and research suggests that it is not necessary for the.welfare of any wildlife population. Prohibition of feeding will probably not result in the reduction of any wildlife populations. Although feeding does not affect deer populations, it may result in an increase in deer/human conflicts. Population Control of Raccoons An aggressive trapping program may reduce temporarily the raccoon population in certain areas of the City. Relocation of the animals is probably not feasible and trapped animals would be destroyed. The selective removal of nuisance animals is the more common approach. Beaver Control The City continues to issue special permits for the removal of beavers which are' obstructing creeks and causing potential flooding. Summary of Conclusion and Recommendations 1) No significant public health and safety reasons can be found to justify the reduction of any wildlife populations in Edina. The City should continue to monitor public health research to' determine if certain control measures are warranted in the future. 2) Canada goose program has been'-successful in reducing the nuisance aspect and continuation of the program is recommended. 3) The problem associated with the deer population in Edina is predicated on shrubs and other ornamental plants. Repellents are effective but require ongoing use throughout the growing season. 4) Artificial feeding is not necessary for wildlife welfare. There is concern with the City's ability to enforce a prohibition of artificial feeding. Prohibiting feeding on City owned properties as a means of demonstrating concern with artificial feeding is recommended, together with publicity in "About Town ". 5) Reducing Edina's deer population is dependent upon reducing deer population of in Bloomington. It is recommended that discussions concerning a larger scale deer control program be pursued at the staff level involving Bloomington, Hennepin Parks and Eden Prairie. 6) The present service level relative to wild animal problems is reasonable and responsive to the expectations of Edina's residents. 7) Reduction of the raccoon population in certain areas of Edina may be possible. 8) Investigation of the feasibility of installing wildlife reflectors in identified deer crossing areas is recommended. The Council Members generally concurred with the committee's report and recommendations. Discussion focused on the problem of raccoons and whether.the City should pursue an aggressive program to reduce their numbers. Mayor Richards made a motion to accept and approve the Wildlife Committee Report and recommendations except that in regard to raccoons staff be directed to develop and bring back a proposed program to reduce the.raccoon population for the Council to consider. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. 1990 CENSUS .POPULATION COUNTS REPORTED Manager Rosland advised that the City has received 1990 population totals for the State of Minnesota from the Bureau of the Census. When comparing the 1980 figures with the most recent counts, it appears that the Edina.population has remained stable while Hennepin County.has experienced a 9.7% increase: 1980 1990 Change City of Edina 46,073 46,070 .0% Hennepin County 941,411 1,032,431 +9.7% The preliminary population count for Edina received from the Census Bureau last fall was 46,012. The most recent figure, 46,070 is a result of the post census local review the City submitted to challenge the preliminary count. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONSJCOMMITTEES Notion was made by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's reappointment of individuals to advisory boards /commissions /committees as follows: Edina Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1/94) Don Peddie, James Van Valkenburg Board of Appeals and Adjustments (3 year term to 2/1/94 Michael Lewis, Leonard Olson Building Construction Appeals Board (3,year term to 2/1/94) Bruce Bermel, Ron Clark Community Development and Planning Commission (3 year term to 2/1/94) Helen McClelland, John Palmer, David Runyan Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/93) Matthew Peterson, Robert Wilkins Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/93) David Gepner, Lois Wilder, Donald Wray Human Relations Commission (3.year term to 2/1/94) Tom Oye Edina Park Board (3 year term to 2/1/94) Bill Jenkins, John Thayer, Pat Vagnoni. Recycling Commission (2 year term to 2/1/93) Virginia Bodine, Inns Hays, Lev Wood Motion for consent of appointments was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards again requested the Council Members to submit names for additional board and commission appointments. He mentioned that he had sent letters to three individuals asking them to respond with the facts why they had missed three consecutive meetings. Also, individuals who had missed four meetings during the year were told by letter that they would not be considered for reappointment. However, they could submit any pertinent facts that they felt should be considered. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO THE EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD Mayor Richards made a motion.to appoint the following to The Edina Foundation Board of Directors: Warren Beck Partial term thru June, 1993 Michael Kelly Partial term thru June, 1992 Leslie Turner Partial term thru June, 1991 Motion was for appointments was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PRELIMINARY AGENDA APPROVED FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING ON 319191 Following discussion, the date for the Strategic Planning Meeting was confirmed for March 9, 1991, at 8:00 a.m. to be held at Arneson Acres Park. Mayor Richards referred to the preliminary agenda for the meeting and said that any additions or changes could be voiced at theiCouncil Meeting of February 19, 1991. *1991 PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the 1991 Community Health Services Agreement as presented, . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager be directed and authorized,to execute, on behalf of the City, the Community Health Services Agreement for 1991 with the City of Bloomington for provision of public health nursing services at a projected cost of $239,915.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. APARTMENT RECYCLING REPORT ACKNOWLEDGED, Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to acknowledge receipt of the Apartment Recycling Report dated February 4, 1991, as presented by the Recycling Coordinator, indicating that apartments and condominiums have setup recycling programs as mandated by City ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS Notion was made by Member Smith, and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota approves the assignment by its depository, First Bank National Association, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description Rate Due Par Value U S Treasury Notes 7.25'Notes G -93 7.250 7%15/93 $3,460,000.00 U S Treasury Notes 7 7/8 Note M 92 7.875 3/31/92 300,000.00 $3,760,000.00 RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota approves the assignment by its depository, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description U S Treasury Notes T92 Rate Due Par Value 7.875 08/15/92 $500,000.00 Motion.carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. INTERGOVERNNENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED 1) School District - .Member Kelly will attend the School Board Strategic_Planning Sessions scheduled for February 13 and 14 as the Council representative. Member Paulus referred to her letter to Mayor Richards regarding her concern over the premier programs that are being initiated by the School District, and the push towards a metro school district (pooling resources and busing). She noted that very few citizens had attended the truth in taxation hearings conducted by the School Board in contrast to the numbers of citizens that had attended the City's truth in taxation hearings at which the message came through loud and clear to reduce spending. Mayor Richards reported he had attended a school "Champs" meeting on February 1 which focused on alcohol use and /or abuse. He suggested that those young people give a short presentation to the Council at an upcoming meeting. 2) Municipal Legislative Commission - Member Smith reported on the MLC Annual Legislative Dinner meeting held on January 30, 1991. He said the presentation by Bob Remmer, MLC lobbyist, focused on trying to do away with the 3 tier property tax system in Minnesota and that they would concentrate on revising the property tax system. Mayor Richards said the MLC Board will try to keep the tax reform movement going. 3) South Hennepin Human Services Council - Member Smith stated that SHHSC is phasing out and planning to spin off their last service area, i.e. Emergency Services Program. What will be left is a proposed planning module in which the City of-Edina will be a participant. The proposal will be reviewed by'the Human Relations Commission for recommendation to the Council. 4) Southwest Suburban Cable Commission - Member Smith reported that SWSCC will be meeting in late-February to review renewal of the franchise agreement and some relief requested by Paragon Cable. Mayor Richards said he had received calls from citizens who feel the basic cable charges are too high. 5) Regional Transit Board - Member Paulus said that she had attended a RTB meeting concerning the Dial -A -Ride program. The resolution adopted by the Council on January 22, 1991, requesting funding of the program as originally proposed was presented to Chairman Ehrlichmann. Larry Laukka was also at the meeting representing the private sector: Mr. Ehrlichmann said there was no money for the program and suggested we contact our local legislators regarding lifting the levy limits. Member Paulus said she was also concerned because the MTC is cutting down on the number of routes available to local residents and it may come down to one route downtown and one route back. CITY'S PUBLIC FACILITIES BILL BE SMOKE FREE AS OF 2/18191 Manager Rosland reported that all of the City's facilities will be smoke free as of February 18, 1991. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 02/04/91 and consisting of 22 pages: General Fund $86,278.76, C.D.B.G. $676.00, Art Center $1,356.33, Capital Fund $4,280.96, Swimming Pool Fund $54.95, Golf Course Fund $16,141.47, Recreational Center Fund $1,713.71, Gun Range Fund $515.61, Edinborough Park $14,657.09, Utility Fund $251,743.21, Storm Sewer Utility $469.69, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,801.20, Construction Fund $1.589.78, TOTAL $385,278.76. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There,being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.' City Clerk - MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 19, 1991 R0L CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CONCERT BAND DAY PROCTArMEn Mayor Richards presented the following proclamation which was unanimously'adopted: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Edina High School Concert Band has continuously rehearsed and performed since the founding of Edina High School in 1949; and WHEREAS, the Band's first concert was performed in Spring, 1950; and. WHEREAS, under the inspired leadership of its conductors, Butler Eitel, Edwin J. Melichar, Robert Elledge, and William Webb, the Band has achieved a record of 38 consecutive years of First .Division ratings at the Minnesota State Band Contest; and WHEREAS, a First Division rating is the highest achievable by a high school in the state of Minnesota, and, WHEREAS, this year the Band celebrates the 38th anniversary of its remarkable Pops Concerts which have entertained more than a quarter million delighted listeners during its venerable history; and WHEREAS, the more than 3,500 musicians who have enriched the Band's heritage and history have time and again achieved local, national, and international acclaim; and, WHEREAS, in keeping with its robust commitment to public service, the Band will perform at the 1991 Minnesota Midwinter Music Educators Convention. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the Tventy- second day of February, 1991, to be EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CONCERT BAND-DAY in the City of Edina.and urge all Edina residents to join with me this month in recognizing this extraordinary Edina institution. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried.. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF 12/17190 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the Council minutes of the regular meeting of December 17, 1990 as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BUILDING EXPANSION DENIED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY - 7001 YORK AVENUE Planner Craig Larsen stated that on January 22, 1991, a public hearing was conducted on the application by the Hennepin County Library at 7001 York Avenue for a Conditional Use Permit for Building Expansion. The hearing was continued to February 19, 1991, to allow the County to respond to concerns raised by the Council: 1) How the book drop -off system might be improved and 2) The 33 parking spaces north of the existing access point from York Avenue that "impinge upon the required 20 foot setback from the property line. Although the County has not submitted any new material, they have indicated they would make a presentation. Presentation by Proponent Book Drop System - Beverly Thiede, Southdale Hennepin Area Library Director, said that the South ale Library is the busiest public library in Minnesota, has the highest circulation and highest number of people entering /exiting the building. The existing lower level book -drop is open only when the library is closed. Book drops a-re for the convenience of patrons unable to get to the library when it is open. Because book -drops are very hard on the materials, patrons are encouraged to come into the building`to return material. Currently, if you come to the library when it is open to just return books, you must bring them upstairs either by using the stairs or elevator. When the renovation is complete, you will be able to return books at a lower level counter near the front door, where the returned material will be placed on a conveyor belt that will keep the books flat while being -moved away. Two options for parking will be provided: 1) Park in the loop for the book drop, walk the same distance and turn in material, or 2) Park in one of the parking spaces that will be under the building which will be signed for 5 or 10 minute parking. Over 1,200,000 items are circulated per year out of the Southdale Library with an average of 405 items coming and going each hour. Ms. Thiede said they have to look at the most efficient and economical way to move material in and out of the building, taking into consideration building costs and staff costs. During the two year renovation, the circulation core will be on the lower level with a book drop in operation also. Member Smith commented that his understanding of a book drop was that you would not have to leave your car and use a parking space. He said it did not make sense to say the library needs more parking and not to do anything regarding a book drop you would still have to park to return materials. Jeff Scherer of MS&R, architects for Hennepin County, said that early on they did look at the possibility of a book drop much like a bank drive -up teller's window that would allow you to stay in your car. The distance the returned book has to travel in order to reach staff processing and the increased square footage that would have to be added to the building in order for that to happen made the cost prohibitive. Also, it would cause congestion because of traffic backup, given the configuration of the building. Parking Mr. Scherer stated that exit studies done at Southdale library during the four busiest months, with November the peak demand, 93% spaces were filled at any one time, with the average at 70 -90 %. Library usage is growing at 1 -2% annually raising parking demand up to 4 -6 spaces per year. Library services that the public is demanding include an enlarged media -area, public service area and more reading spaces. Parking demands will increase beyond the normal growth because of the demand for service. Mr. Scherer pointed out that the depressed parking would mitigate the impact of the requested additional 33 spaces on the west side of the site. Also, the adjacent uses to the north all fall within 10 feet of the property line for parking so that, visually, as you travel north on York Avenue there is a consistency. Facility usage per month that was not included in the exit counts: 1200 people use the meeting. rooms, the service center conducts 14,OOO.revenue producing transactions, the court averages 1000,cases per month and approximately 1000 people walk in to pay citations. The main attempt is to couple the demand.for services with the demand for parking. Mayor Richards asked about the feasibility of building a ramp to handle the anticipated continued growth in demand for service. Mr. Scherer responded that although a ramp may be possible, it would not be economical in light of the County's budget constraints and the fact that ramps are not revenue producing. What the County is seeking is maximum convenience given a limited physical configuration to work with. Member Kelly raised the question of handicap access for the building. Mr. Scherer stated that the building now is fully handicap accessible. When the building addition is completed, the handicap spaces will be moved under cover of the building. The plans also include automatic doors on the building. In regard to the reported 70 -90% parking lot usage, Member Paulus asked if 70% was considered high usage. Mr. Scherer answered that, although it is a matter of perception of parking spaces in relation to the front door, in his opinion the parking lot is being used to capacity. Member Paulus said she was also concerned about the cost to the taxpayer to asphalt surface parking now.if a parking ramp were required in a few years and who would bear the cost of restoring the green space area. Mr. Scherer suggested that a condition to the Conditional Use Permit could be that if parking was satisfied in another way in the future the setback area would have to be restored to the existing condition. Raymond Johnson, Hennepin County Property Manager, submitted that it would be impossible to look that far ahead and imagine a multi -story parking facility, but if such a constraint was a condition to the Conditional Use Permit, the County would have to comply with it. Mr. Johnson questioned the feasibility of a ramp system in the future when open parking lots cost between $1200 to $1500 per car and ramp costs would be between $4000-to $5000 per car. As with any site, the optimum amount of land use would reach a limit as to building and parking as imposed by the zoning. Mayor Richards commented that he felt the County had not sat down with City staff to discuss the concerns that were raised by the Council and to confer on revised plans. The expectation of the Council was that revised plans would be presented and this has not happened. Mr. Johnson responded that the County had appeared before the Planning Commission and had presented building expansion plans that included a parking setback variance. The recommendation of the Planning Commission was to approve the Conditional Use Permit including the parking setback variance. The plan provides for a covered, ground floor book drop off area and short -term parking spaces located within a two minute walk to drop off material and return to your car. Member Rice asked if there was any library science reason to not have a book drop. Ms. Thiede answered that book drops are for the convenience of the patron when the library is closed. When open, staff prefers that patrons enter the building to return materials in order to preserve the material,. pay fines, etc. Currently, a book drop is not feasible during hours when the library is open with the automated circulation system now in place. A new circulation system for Hennepin County libraries will be implemented within the same two -year renovation period whereby it will be possible to set the computer clocks by building so that if necessary the book drop could be left open during library hours. Member Rice commented that he felt the patrons would like to see the book drop remain open during library hours. It would also require fewer parking spaces. Mr. Scherer noted that currently he is working with three systems where curbside drops are being removed because the various sizes and volumes of materials cause the drops to'jam. Ms. Thiede countered by saying that she was not sure patrons would want to give up other service areas to provide square footage for a book drop. Mayor Richards then called for public comment from the audience on the Conditional Use Permit for the Southdale Hennepin Area Library. No comment was heard thereon. Member Smith.made a motion to deny the Conditional Use Permit for Building Expansion for the Hennepin County Library at 7001 York Avenue, and that no variance be granted. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. e Member Kelly asked, if denied, would the County be able to come back with alternate plans. Attorney Erickson stated the County could not come back fora, period of one year. The request may be resubmitted if directed by the Council upon a 3/5 favorable vote after evidence of a change of fact or circumstance. Mr. Scherer asked if the application for the Conditional Use Permit could be separated from the variance request. Attorney Erickson stated that the Planning Commission based their recommendation on the package. The Council does have the power to separate the two issues if it wished. Member Kelly commented that, although the County had returned with the same plan, she felt the library is an asset to the community and encouraged the County to work on changing their plan. Mayor Richards then called for'rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. BIDS AVARDED FOR 50TH & FRANCE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS (STREETSCAPE AND PAVEMENTS, ELECTRICAL SPECIALTIES, BENCHES, LANDSCAPING) AND IMPROVEMENT NO. PP -4 PARKING FACILITY Engineer Hoffman'presented details on bids for Phase II of the. 50th & France Streetscape Renovation and Improvement No. P -4 - Parking Facility. He explained that the Phase II renovation included bids for Streets cape and Pavements, Electrical Specialties (directories /monuments), Benches, and Landscaping. All of these improvements were approved in the public hearing held on June 4, 1990, and were planned to be done in four stages to ensure the least amount of disruption of business and services. Staff will be meeting with the 50th & France Business & Professional Association on March 6, 1991, to review the renovation /construction. schedule. With regard to the bid for Electrical Specialties, Engineer Hoffman advised that the low bidder, Arrigoni Bros. Co., did not meet plan specifications which they have acknowledged. Staff would recommend award of bid to Thomas & Sons Construction, next low bidder. Eight bids were received. for the Parking Facility to be constructed off of West 49 1/2 Street between France and Halifax Avenues. The low bid submitted by James Steel Construction at $876,600.00, against engineer's estimate of $856,000.00. Member Rice said he had heard that Lund's are planning some renovation projects for the properties they own on the north side of West 50th Street and asked if those would interfere with the City's 50th & France renovation and /or necessitate any re- does. Engineer Hoffman said the City's projects are staged so as not to conflict with any proposed renovations by Lund's. Also, any Lund's projects should not un -do any of the 50th & France renovation. . Member Paulus recalled that she had expressed concern at the public hearing in June,, 1990, about the large cost of the parking ramp project and whether this would actually solve the parking problem perceived by the merchants. She said she had never seen the lot 100% full and that the problem really is the conflict between employees and shoppers as to where they are allowed to park. The building of the ramp will not alleviate the ongoing issue: Engineer Hoffman observed that at the public hearing last June, the 50th & France merchants and owners had indicated a strong need for additional parking in the area. They now have established a committee that will address the issue of parking distribution. Staff had concluded that the project is viable now and will be through the 1901s. Assistant Manager Hughes recalled that a comprehensive parking study had been done by staff and was presented at the June 4, 1990, hearing. The counts which were taken at peak times, indicated an average usage percentage of 73 %. Future developments were also discussed, i.e., Walgreens and the empty space on the south side behind.existing shops, which will present a new demand for parking. Another factor is the trend in tax increment law towards more restrictions that may make it more difficult to do projects like this in the future. From a financial standpoint, staff would not recommend delay of the ramp on the concept of acquiring better bids in a year or two. Hosmer Brown, Attorney, property owner at 50th & France, said the 50th & France Association had taken seriously the suggestion by the Council in November to develop a parking plan for the area. The committee's main focus has been to get input from everyone on.the corner so that once the plan was devised it would be acceptable to all. Two problems have been identified, regulation of parking usage and the need for additional parking in anticipation of further development. The committee's goal is to have a plan developed by no later than June 1 to regulate the parking. On behalf of the Association, Mr. Brown urged that the project go forward-. Member Paulus asked, if the Association is unable to reach a conclusion, could the Council propose how the parking would be used. Attorney Erickson stated that, since the ramps are owned by the City, the Council could establish rules and regulations as to use. Member Paulus said that we also have to consider the needs of the residents who use the ramps and the restrictions imposed on them by limited hours of parking. Violet Sather, 50th & France Association Board Member, acknowledged that there is an employee parking problem and that the committee that has been established will settle that issue. Brian Duoos, Sales Manager for Edina Realty, said he was representing Edina Realty and also Jim Nelson, President of Eberhardt Company and building owner. Over the years they have seen the need for parking grow and since their second-floor was added they have greatly expanded their staff. He said he agreed with the 50th & France Association that the ramp is essential, not only for their employees but also for the customers who shop and frequent the corner. Member Kelly asked whether the ramp is being driven by the 50th & France Association or if it was in the original long range plan for the area. Assistant Manager Hughes observed that the 50th & France development plan showed the site as public parking. When the south ramp was expanded, a feasibility study done then concluded that the next place to expand parking would be at 49,1/2 Street. Member Kelly submitted that the tax increment district was established to encourage development of business at 50th & France and adequate parking is a part of that. Further, that approval of the Walgreens development and the required parking was predicated upon construction of the ramp and that she would be in full support of its construction. Member Smith clarified that there is no proprietary interest in any ramp by any business. He also believes that the parking is not only'an employee problem but also an owner problem. Mayor Richards asked when construction would be completed if the bid is. awarded. Engineer Hoffman said the work would begin March 1, and would be essentially completed by August 1, with usage to begin mid - August. Mayor Richards urged the Association to finish their process and bring the report and recommendation to the Council. Member Paulus suggested that the report be placed on the June 3, 1991, agenda and that prior to that it be reviewed by the Planning staff and the Chief of Police. Member Smith made a motion for award of bid for Improvement No. P -4 Parking Facility off 49 1/2 to recommended'low bidder, James Steele Construction, at $876,600.00, with the understanding that the 50th & France Association would present their parking plan on June 3, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Rice made a motion for award of bid for the 50th & France Streetscape and Pavements to recommended low bidder, Adcon, Inc., at $671,150.00. Motion was. seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Rice made a motion'for award of bid for the 50th & France Electrical Specialties to recommended second bidder, Thomas & Sons Construction at $104,000.00. Rollcall: - Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Rice made a motion for award of bid for the 50th & France benches to recommended low bidder, C.S. McCrossan, Inc., at $19,325.00. Motion was seconded b, Mayor Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Rice made a motion for award of bid to 50th & France Landscaping to recommended low bidder, Arteka Corporation at $63,844.08. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.' Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Engineer Hoffman noted that bids have not as yet been solicited for three remaining elements of the streetscape project: 1) Canopy covering alley east of Belleson's, 2) Two additional sets of seasonal banners (spring /summer and autumn), and 3) General upgrade of signage (better direction to parking). Member Paulus asked what was originally budgeted for the projects and what has been spent to date. Assistant Manager Hughes summarized as follows: Budgeted Amounts as of June 4, 1990: $3,058,083 Under Contract to Date: 2,704,583 Expected Contracts in the Future: 101,000 Factored in Contingency Budget: 200,000 TOTAL $3,005,583 *BID AWARDED FOR WELL RENOVATION OF WELL #5 & #17 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for renovation of well #5 & #17 to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company at $13,415.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FOUR WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATED LOADER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for one four wheel drive articulated loader with trade -in, to sole bidder, Ziegler, Inc. at $45,430.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BIDS REJECTED FOR LIFT STATION REMODELING - W. 72ND STREET, TO BE REBID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to reject all bids for Lift Station Remodeling at W. 72nd Street and to authorize rebid. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE UTILITY TRACTOR WITH CAB, WING AND REAR MOWER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for four -wheel drive utility tractor with cab, wing and rear mower'to recommended low- bidder, Long Lake Ford Tractor, Inc., at $34,983.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE PURCHASE Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Police Department vehicle purchase to National Car Rental ('89 Pontiac) per Hennepin County Used Vehicle Purchase Contract #8880A0, at $7,600.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. SENIOR CENTER RELOCATION PROJECT AND LONG TERM LEASE APPROVED Bob Christianson, Park Board Chairman, presented the recommendation of the Park Board that the City Council approve the Senior Center Relocation project to be funded with the $45,000 capital improvements budget for,1991 and to additionally recommend that $60,000 from the Developer's Fund be used to complete the project. The Council had discussed the Senior Center relocation proposal at the Council Meeting of December 14, 1990, and had asked for additional information concerning: 1) Total concept of the relocation of the Senior Center, 2) Funding program for the total project, 3) Park Board approval and recommendation, and 4) School Board's approval of the concept and long term lease. Mr. Christianson referred to the Senior Center Relocation Report which summarized the Senior Center Task Force findings and which addressed their proposal to move the Senior Center from its present location in the West Community Room of the Community Center to the new location in rooms 303, 304, 305, 308,.309, 311, 351. This has been under discussion since the Senior Center was moved from York Avenue to the Edina Community Center in 1988. The Park Board concurred that this is the best possible location for the Senior Center at the present time. The City already has a working partnership with the School District concerning the Senior Center, i.e. grants for installation of an elevator to make the building more accessible for senior citizens. The estimated construction costs,and funding for the relocation project were given as follows: PHASE I: Demolition, new walls and plastering $ 10,000 (City funded -Work by City crews) Mechanical /Electrical /Control Doors 45,000 (Bid items)" Carpeting /furnishings 17.000 (Outside funds) 1 TOTAL $ 72,000 PHASE II: Air Conditioning, Lighting, Floor Coverings $ 30,000 Engineering /Architects Fees 2.000 GRAND TOTAL $104,000 Mr. Christianson pointed out that at present there is $507,066 in the Developer's Fund. Of this amount $130,000 is committed to Van Valkenburg Park and $150,000 is committed to the Art Center, of which $50,000 will be paid back over a five year period. Within the next year a total of $142,000 will be paid in from the Cahill development. The Park Board felt it would be an appropriate use to draw down the Developer's Fund to complete the Senior Center Relocation Project. The Community Education Service Board approved the conceptual plan on February 14, 1991, and recommended that the plan proceed. The.long -term lease agreement with the School District has been extended to the year 2000. A presentation will be made to the School Board on March 4, 1991, requesting their approval of the project. Mr. Christianson concluded by saying that the Park Board recommendation was unanimous following considerable discussion and urged the Council's approval. Member Paulus commented that recent School Board minutes had indicated that the School District may need additional space and asked if the contract with the School District provides for notice if they planned to take the space back. Attorney Erickson said the document provides that at two -year notice must be given. Doug' Johnson, Community Center Director, indicated that the School Board has just completed a ten -year facility projection. As currently projected, the need would be for 12 additional rooms for secondary students on the second floor. It is not anticipated that any space would be used on the third floor by the District. Member Paulus also asked what the additional sources would be for the $17,000 of outside funding. Mr. Christianson said the plan is to possibly obtain a grant from The Edina Foundation, fund- ,raising efforts and contributions from senior citizens. Member Smith added that this would be a way to give the seniors a feeling of ownership by involving them in fund - raising efforts. Member Rice.asked if, in the opinion of the Park Board and City staff, there was majority support from the seniors themselves for this location. Mr. Christianson said that, from the Park Board's observations, it is the best alternative available at this time and that it is not realistic that the City would fund and build a free- standing senior center. Susan Weigle, Senior Center Director, explained that the biggest problem for seniors is parking, getting to the building and then upstairs; once there, everything is fine. Member Kelly asked if the $3.00 membership fee covered any of the costs of the seniors' program. Director Weigle explained that the seniors pay user's fees for special events. The membership fees have been used for special purchase, i.e. piano, copier, bottled water, etc. Member Smith moved the following: 1) To authorize the mayor and manager to execute the long -term lease between School District No. 273 and the City of Edina for the Edina Senior Center space in the Edina Community Center, 2) To authorize the total project for the relocation /renovation of the Edina Senior Center within the Edina Community Center building, 3) To approve funding up to $87,000, ($45,000 from 1991 Capital Fund and up to $60,000 from Developer's Fund), and 4) To direct staff to develop a plan for non - public funding of $17,000 for the project. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION RESCINDED ON TAX FORFEIT LAND DEVEY HILL ESTATES, NEW RESOLUTION ADOPTED Mayor Richards recalled that on February 4, 1991, the City Council adopted a resolution requesting conveyance of Lot 3, Block 1, Dewey Hill Estates to the City for park and open space purposes. This resolution was conditioned upon the receipt by February 25, 1991, of the outstanding installments of special assessments which have been levied against this parcel. It was anticipated that the payment of these installments would come from the surrounding.condominium developments. Staff proceeded to file the February 4, 1991, resolution, together with an application for the conveyance of tax forfeit land with Hennepin County on February 7, 1991. Letters were received from Dick Reichow, of Dewey Hill East, Roy Anderson of Dewey Hill West and Roy Smith of Cahill of Edina. Their letters advise that these Condominium Associations have decided not to participate in the payment of outstanding special assessments. They also noted that Windwoods has also elected not to participate. Based upon information, staff requests permission to withdraw the resolution and application with Hennepin County and recommends that the Council adopt a new resolution requesting the County to proceed with a public sale. Mr. Reichow spoke to his letter submitted on behalf of Dewey Hill East Condominiums that had stated, although they desired that the land stay as open space, they could not participate financially and had concluded their only recourse would be to wait and see what happens when and if the property is sold. He asked if the association could be informed of the date of sale for the subject parcel. Assistant Manager Hughes said if staff receives that information from Hennepin County it could be passed on to the association. Mayor Richards asked for clarification to comments in the letters that the Council would not give binding assurance that the land would remain as open space even though the outstanding special assessments were paid by the associations and that their. investment may be for naught. Attorney Erickson opined that, if the land is deeded to the City. without payment of money, it would be'restricted to the specific uses the City had requested, i.e. open.space or park. If the City wanted to change that specific use it would have to get permission to do so. Also, if the City would forego that use the land would automatically revert to the State of Minnesota. The Council, in .the future, could decide it did not wish to use if for the stated reason and give it back to the State but it would have to be an overt act or an abandonment by the City. With regard to money that the associations may pay on the specials, once the money is paid to the City it becomes public moneys to be used for public purposes. If the land ever reverted back to the State, it would be doubtful that paying the money back to the association could be considered a public purpose. Attorney Erickson concluded by saying that the risk would be very small as he had not seen any tax forfeit land acquired by the City revery back to the State. Mayor Richards reiterated that if a. private party buys this property, the comprehensive land use plan would allow this property to be used for a multiple unit building. Mr. Reichow asked if the storm water drainage could be changed by a' developer. Engineer Hoffman responded that the City would require that the drainage as it exists today would be preserved. Planner Larsen clarified that the property is zoned PRD -3 and plans for a 42 unit building has been approved. The City would be obligated to issue a building permit to construct a building according to those specific plans without any further public hearings or notice other than review of the building permit.- However, any change to those specific plans would require the public hearing process. Vince Lorimer, resident, Dewey Hill West, explained that the association initially thought the approximate $58,000 could be raised. When Windwood and Cahill Townhomes said they could not participate, the amount needed grew from $165 to $500 per unit, and considering all the legal aspects, this became impossible. He mentioned their major concern was not knowing what future decisions might be made for the property. However, they still hoped it could remain,an open space. Albert Levine, resident, Dewey Hill East, asked if they could have more time in which to approach.the developer of the Dewey Hills Condominiums regarding the unpaid special assessments so that the individuals would not have to be assessed. Mayor Richards stated that would be a private matter and that,the time constraints on this parcel are controlled by Hennepin County. Member Paulus made a motion directing staff to withdraw the resolution adopted by .the Council on February 4, 1991, and submitted to Hennepin County, requesting conveyance of Lot 3, Block 1, Dewey Hill Estates, for park and open space purposes, and moved adoption of the following new resolution: RESOLUTION RELEASIRG CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received on 12/03/89, Non - Conservation. List 741 -NC; and WHEREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PINS No. 08- 116 -21 -42 -0214 has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282, that the said classification by said Board of County Commissioners for said parcel of land described in said.list as non - conservation land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of said parcel of land by public auction be and the same is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by said City Council, that it hereby certifies the total amount of unpaid special assessments levied against said parcel of land to be $52,737.71. ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 1991. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes:. Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN FOR STORK WATER UTILITY PRESENTED: 1991 PROJECTS APPROVED Engineer Hoffman presented the Five Year Capital Plan for Storm Water Utility Systems of the City. Line items were explained and discussed and 1991 projects were identified. Member Smith's motion was seconded by Member Rice to approve the recommended "Five Year Capital Plan for Storm Water Utility" as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice; Smith, Richards Motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS/ COMMISSIONS /COM IITTEES APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for consent of the Mayor's appointment of individuals to advisory boards /commissions /committees as follows: Edina Art Center Committee .(3 year term to 2/1/94) Sandra Clark (reappointment) Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/93) Herman Ratelle Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/91) Patricia Smith (consumer) Human Relations Commission (3 year term to 2/1/94) Jean Rifley Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus; Rice, Smith, Richards I Motion carried. APPOINTMENT OPEN ON EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD Mayor Richards informed the Council that Leslie Turner has declined appointment to The Edina Foundation Board at this time and that position remains open. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR I- 4941169 LAND Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that staff be authorized and direct to execute a purchase agreement between the Central Minnesota Service Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and Pokegama Service Corporation, a Minnesota corporation and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation for land acquisition located in the northeast quadrant of Highways I -494 and 169, for $290,000. Motion for adoption of the resolution was•seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as shoving detail on the Check Register dated 2/19/91 and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $220,599.94, C.D.B.G. $911.00, Communications $5,697.51, Art Center $4,621.54, Capital Fund $332.91, Swimming Pool Fund $10,575.56, Golf Course Fund $20,863.74, Recreation Center Fund $15,889.65, Gun Range Fund $238.50, Edinborough Park $22,464.31, Utility.Fund $32,943.47, Storm Water Utility $4,044.10, Liquor Dispensary Fund $108,264.50, Construction Fund $992.53, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $551.25, TOTAL $448,990.51; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register of 1/31/91, and consisting of 20 pages: General Fund $398,982.41, Art Center $1,532.13, Swimming Pool Fund $103.52,_ Golf Course Fund $15,165.05, Recreation Center Fund $12,906.86, Gun Range Fund $498.78, Edinborough Park $12,425.53, Utility Fund $24,448.46, Storm Sewer Utility $490.66, Liquor Dispensary Fund $289,497.14, TOTAL $756,050.54. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:04 P.M. City Clerk r� L� its O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 18 March, 1991 Subject: Public Hearing Sidewalk Project S -52 W. 66th Street from France Ave. to Approximately 400 Feet East to Existing Sidewalk Recommendation: Agenda Item * TT R . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize project for construction and appropriate funds for construction on County Road subject to sidewalk easement. Info/Background- The City Council received a petition from the Point of France residents request- ing completion of sidewalk along the north side of W. 66th Street (County Road) from France Avenue to existing sidewalk /and walk access into Southdale Shopping Center. This project could be funded by state aid funds appropriated for use on a County Road. Hennepin County policy is that the County will not build or fund sidewalks on their roads. The attached public hearing notice was sent to the appropriate property owners. Staff has proposed that the walkways be constructed on both existing right -of -way and private property with appropriate easements. Staff will present additional information at the Council meeting. �L CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMM S-52 WEST 66TH STREET (NORTH SIDE) FROM FRANCE AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 400' .EAST TO EXISTING SIDEWAIX ALSO FROM FRANCE AVENUE TO NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHDALE PARKING LOT The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, March 18, 1991 at 7 :00 P.M., to hold a Public Hearing on the construction of a sidewalk on West 66th Street along the North side from France Avenue to 400 feet East of France Avenue. Also, from France Avenue and West 66th Street intersection to the Northwest corner of Southdale parking'lot.' This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from residents in this' area who would like to see improved pedestrian access for the area. Under cur- rent City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the respon- sibility of the City. The estimated construction cost of the project is $20,022.66. The cost of the proposed project will be funded by state -aid gas tax as this is on the County street system and eligible for this funding. Hennepin County does not finance. sidewalks on its roads. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete.' The sidewalk alignment will be placed to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in late 1991. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improve- ment may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior -to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional informa- tion, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. Francis J. offman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -52 Hn !TA I i i m v 0 O SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER KEY Proposed Sidewalk RESOLUTION WHEREAS, It has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 53 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, Said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -030. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street ,Funds the sum of $25,000.00 dollars to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 18, 1991 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this lst day of July, 1991. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 150 -04 FROM WEST 50TH STREET IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 18th day of March, 1991, by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has planned the improvement of MSAS 150 (Wooddale Avenue) from West 50th Street to West 56th Street; WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore the conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City, has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS.HEREBY RESOLVED: That the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles at all times on the west side of MSAS 150 (Wooddale Avenue) and on the east side of MSAS 150 (Wooddale Avenue) from Wooddale Lane to the north side of Wooddale Bridge Crossing Minnehaha Creek. Dated this 18th day of March, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY'-OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 18, 1991 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting: WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1st day of July, 1991. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk l Cn o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council) From. Francis Hoffman /J City Engineer / Date: 18 March, 1991 Subject: Public Hearing Sidewalk Project S -53 Cornelia Drive from Cornelia School to W. 72nd Street (West Side) & W. 72nd Street from Cornelia to Oaklawn (North ,Side) Recommendation: Authorize Project. Info/Background- Agenda Item # ILI c. ° Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The City Council received a petition from many residents whose children walk to Cornelia Elementary School. Their petition requests that a walkway be constructed on Cornelia Park as depicted on the attached public hearing notice and map. The map depicts the location of the proposed walkway and the location of those who had interest in the project. The proposed project is recommended to be a special assessment project. The assessment split would be 257 School District, 25% City and 50% residents in a defined area south of the school who walk to Cornelia according to the school's transportation staff. City staff has contacted School District staff to make them aware of the hearing and the potential assessment. CITY OF EDI NA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWAIR IMPROVEMM S-53 CORNELIA DRIVE (WEST SIDE) FROM CORNELIA SCHOOL TOW 72ND STREET• W. 72ND STREET (NORTH SIDE) FROM CORNELIA DRIVE TO OAKLAWN AVENGE The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, March 18, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., to hold a.Public Hearing on the construction of a sidewalk on Cornelia Drive (West side) from Cornelia School to W. 72nd Street; and W. 72nd Street (North side) from Cornelia Drive to Oaklawn Avenue. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from Cornelia PTA and residents in this area who would like to see school access become safer by construction of a sidewalk. Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The estimated construction cost of the project is $29,267.20. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The proposed, assessment would be 258 School District, 258 City, and 508 residents. The estimated cost per residential lot is $100.23 spread over a ten year period (i.e., $10.00 per year with interest on the unpaid balance). The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The sidewalk will be placed immediately behind the curb on West 72nd Street and there will be approximately an eight foot boulevard between the street and sidewalk on Cornelia Drive. The proposed project would be constructed in 1991 with the special assessment to occur in 1992. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement The description of properties where sidewalk construction will take place is as follows: Lots 1 thru 30, Blk. 1, and Lots I' thru 26, Blk. 2, Oscar Roberts First Addition; Outlot 2, South estates 3rd Addition; Lots 24 thru 27, Blk. 4, South Garden Estates 3rd Addi- tion; Lots 1 thru 17, Blk. 5, Lots 1 thru 14, Blk. 6, South Garden Estates 3rd Addition; Lots 1 thru 14, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 14, Blk. 3, South Garden Estates 4th Addition; Lots thru 6, Blk. 3, South Garden Estates 3rd Addition; Lots 1 thru 6, Blk. 1 South Garden Estates 4th Addition; and that Parcel 3628 part of the North 1060 feet of the West 25 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 lying East of West 210 feet thereof, except road in North 1/2 of Section 31, Township 28, Range 24. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4 :30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thanis-Zou. Francis J. ffmah' P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -53 ., 4141• 4141.. 4141 4141. C0RNELi EL E M.* SC H,& ci 00,0410 .0 41.41- ° PA R K J' W•4141. Y IV � N Rgoss oals HIBISCUS AVE. WN 7�4 S Proposed Sidewalk ®. EDIN:A %. Petitioned for Sidewalk PRIMiANDALE , `,a YVLO,� I'A I� A% b4-Pill), CA- Co upi 1 z S .wu R n1 CYW S5 �-1..E C��+ -� vL L F— (J 44L.\L Lu 4 \I( �t-� S \ �-¢ �-V (a:��(.. A \ VLQ(} �- � X1.0 V � � � �o �. � �!? N.N i S ►'� "\k+ gOo AYISL S �LZLe)l. \kS o N C O 2n1 e 1 A 'Ott, W', ;L N cS W�n1L�J V p O ►J C.'�O NO 5 - l � QA \L A-'(1$ i�U A. \ U PAp �.Q 0),) i"N y\ ►L- �Vz-� � � ►-� �n2-` , � YyLQA �� J ��A la-►� eX kto Clan 1N �E ��"r ►� 1'��`:2 J P � C� v C P ►.� S -e-e `�li� � S Q �� e c� � � S�' � er2 S t�c�'� MA� S- - P Q- C O M M G ,k.! S 2 iJ c l.v l Ph-CC y A. otz, e !y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor .& City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer`., Date: 18 March, 1991 Subject: Public Hearing Sidewalk Project S -51 Wooddale Avenue from St. Stephen's Church to W. 56th Street (East Side) Recommendation: Options: A. No build. Agenda Item # TT-A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action [11 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion B. Authorize sidewalk project with Minnehaha Creek crossing on separate crossing or use existing street by narrowing. ' Info/Background- The City Council received a petition to construct a sidewalk on Wooddale Avenue from Wooddale Lane to W. 56th Street. See attached petition letter and their summation of the responses to the petition. The staff has reviewed the options for this project. The petition requests the east side of the street and staff believes that is the better side primarily because no right -of -way exists that is adequate to use on the west side along the golf course. The second set of options is crossing Minnehaha Creek. Option One is to cross the creek east of the existing structure on a separate pedestrian crossing. Right -of -way exists to e:cercise this option. Option two is to restrict parking on the east side of Wooddale from Wooddale Lane to St. Stephen's Church. This would allow us to narrow the street to 32 feet wide which would allow enough room to construct a sidewalk crossing over Minnehaha Creek on the street side of the Wooddale Bridge east abutment. The attached notice of public hearing was sent to homeowners in the affected area. Responses to this notice is also attached. The concerns expressed indi- cate that a separate pedestrian bridge is not desirable. Considerable concern has been expressed over the need for the project. Improved pedestrian access is the primary objective for the project and is consistent with the comprenehsive plan. OVER Report /Recommendation Public Hearing Sidewalk Project S -51 Wooddale Avenue from St. Stephen's Church to W. 56th Street (East Side) Page Two Traffic volumes on Wooddale average around 5000 vehicles per day and has been at consistent traffic volume over the past fifteen years. The project is proposed to be funded by state aid funds as this is an eligible street for funding. The recommended options for this project are: (A) No build. (B) Construct - East Side - Separate Pedestrian Bridge. (C) Construct - East Side - Narrow Street at Bridge. *..;CITY Oc fDINA 1801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT S -51 WOODDALE AVENUE (EAST SIDE) FROM - " -- -- ST. STEPHEN'S CHURCH TOW 56TH STREET The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, March 18, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., to hold a Public Hearing on the construction of a sidewalk on Wooddale Avenue along the East side from'St. Stephen's Church to W. 56th Street. This would include a pedestrian bridge across Minnehaha'Creek tying in the existing sidewalk at St. Stephen's Church. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. . . This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from residents in this area who would like to see Wooddale Avenue become a safer street for all pedestrians. Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The estimated construction cost of the project is $147,330.40:. The cost of the project will be funded by state -aid gas tax as this is on our collector street system. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The sidewalk will be placed immediately behind the curb to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in late 1991. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that Rroperty whose ownership'is qlisted to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Attached is a summary of the resident's interest in this project as submitted to the City by the petitioners. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you.. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf .SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -51 w 50 T ,y T - T E a U.LEY Epp } PARK - Q N T < r- < t N T !1 r'?f•y 92 110 S T 'LUB /LADEN - - -- ,,.1. -PARK .,• jv . 4 TM co O tt O w < t O 4E Y o � sp � 1 W TM - KEY Proposed Sidewalk tWant Sidewalk o Want Sidewalk - No Cost T m r sir "I r Do Not Want Sidewalk • January 2, 1991 Dear City Council'Members: In the interest of safety for all residents of Wooddale Avenue and surrounding neighborhood, we are submitting the enclosed petition for sidewalks on Wooddale Avenue. As submitted, we are requesting that sidewalks be installed on the east side of Wooddale Avenue, between Wooddale'Lane and 56th Street. It is our understanding that this stretch of Wooddale Avenue is eligible for improvements with state gas tax funds. On our petition drive we explained this eligibility, but also gave the respondent an opportunity to sign with the disclaimer "no" or "no cost" if an assessment is ultimately required. Please note that we clearly stated on the petition that respondents sign: "only if you are in support of sidewalks. However, if you are in support only if they are of no cost to you, please indicate after your signature (No) or (No Cost) ".. Also enclosed is a chronological residence by residence account of responses for your consideration -and convenience (Addendum A). We made at least 3 attempts to.contact those "not at home". Before submission of this petition we delivered a flyer to these residences with a request to contact us if they were in.support of sidewalks, so that their names could be included. Additionally, we have enclosed a listing of negative responses. (Addendum B). As we have enlisted the support of 56.8% of the residents on our drive,.,we hope that the members of the Council will give this petition their utmost consideration. Sincerely, `3ane Meller ,5509 Wooddale Avenue Karen Stein 5513 Wooddale Avenue Wooddale Lane to Wooddale Glen 5029 Wooddale 5,105 Wooddale 5107 Wooddale 5109 Wooddale 5111 Wooddale 5113 Wooddale 5115 Wooddale Lane Ave Ave Ave Ave Ave Glen - YES YES (at no cost) Not at home Not at home NO YES (at no cost) -YES Wooddale Glen to 52nd Street 5131 Wooddale Glen - YES 5133 Wooddale Ave - YES 52nd- - Street to 53rd Street 5209 Wooddale Ave - 5217 Wooddale Ave - 5221 Wooddale Ave - 5237 Wooddale Ave - 5241 Wooddale Ave - 5245 Wooddale Ave - 53rd Street to 54th NO NO YES YES Not at home Not at home Street 5301 Wooddale Ave - NO 5305 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5309 Wooddale Ave - NO 5313 Wooddale Ave.- YES 5317 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5325 Wooddale Ave - NO 5329 Wooddale Ave - YES 5333 Wooddale Ave - YES 5337 Wooddale Ave - NO 54th Street to 55th Street 5401 Wooddale Ave - Not at home 5403 Wooddale Ave - Not at home 5409 Wooddale Ave - YES 5413 Wooddale Ave -_ Not at home 5417 Wooddale Ave - Not at home 5421 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5425 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5429 Wooddale Ave - YES at.home 5433 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5437 Wooddale Ave - NO 55th Street to 56th Street 5501 Wooddale Ave - YES 5505,Wooddale Ave - NO 5509 Wooddale Ave - YES 5513 Wooddale Ave - YES 5517 Wooddale Ave - YES 5521 Wooddale Ave - YES 5525 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5529.Wooddale Ave -.Not at.home 5533 Wooddale Ave - YES (at no cost) 5537 Wooddale Ave - NO Summary: 56.8 % YES (25) 22.7 % NO (10) 20.5 % not at home (9) SEE OTHER SIDE Not at home 5107 Wooddale 5109 Wooddale 5241 Wooddale 5245 Wooddale 5305 Wooddale 5401 Wooddale 5403 Wooddale 5413 Wooddale 5417 Wooddale 5529 Wooddale NO Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. 5111 - no comment 5209 - 5217 - 5301 - owner worried about salt on yard 5309 - owner worried about interference with landscaping 5325 - owner doesn't want extra traffic 5337 - doesn't believe sidewalks would be maintained by city - wants Wooddale Avenue to maintain "rural appearance" 5437 - owner doesn't believe it would be maintained or provided at no cost 5505 - 5537 - owner doesn't believe it would be maintained - owner wants Wooddale Ave to maintain "rural appearance" Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members: March 12, 1991 We are Edina homeowners residing at 5009 Wooddale Lane. We are writing in reference to a proposal before the city council to construct a concrete walkway that will extend from the existing sidewalk in front of St. Stephen's Church across Minnehaha Creek and south along the east side of Wooddale Avenue to 56th Street. This sidewalk, according to the'proposal mailed -by the City Engineering.Department, would be five feet wide along its entire length and would abut the curb. Because of the narrowness of the bridge crossing Minnehaha Creek, it is proposed that a separate, free - standing, steel pedestrian bridge should be installed immediately to the east of the existing vehicular bridge. Because our property (at the corner of Wooddale Lane and Wooddale Avenue and immediately adjacent to the bridge across Minnehaha Creek) would be adversely affected by this project, we wish to explain our concerns. (1) The area east of the bridge contains mature trees. We have added shrubs, ground cover and flower gardens, and have landscaped the creek embankment with large field stones so that the area blends nicely with the stone bridge. It is readily visible from the street and from St. Stephen's and from our house. Installation of a steel pedestrian bridge would be aesthetically offensive. In addition, construction of the approaches to the pedestrian bridge would sacrifice areas on and adjacent to our property. Depending on the exact site, construction of a pedestrian bridge would necessitate either removal of two mature trees immediately adjacent to the vehicular bridge on our side of the creek and two younger trees f on the St. Stephen's side or intruding further into our back yard to swing around the trees. (2) Adjacent to Wooddale Avenue, between the street and a hedge set 12 feet away from the street, we have established a large, formal, English flower garden at considerable expense and effort over the past 10 years. Gardeners always overestimate their creations, but we believe that'our garden does make a contribution to the beauty and livability of the neighborhood. We receive many comments to that effect from neighbors, church - goers, and passing pedestrians and motorists. Installation of a five foot wide sidewalk would markedly reduce the area available for a garden, and its construction would have a devastating effect on the remainder. Several years ago we planted two Norway maples along the street to replace diseased elms, and these trees have now grown to a substantial size. They are located about six feet from the curbing, and we believe that construction of the sidewalk would threaten their viability. (3) We are sympathetic to the idea of improved pedestrian access along a busy street; and we would be happy to participate in discussions as to how this might be accomplished. We feel that the proposal submitted by the Engineering Department is unacceptable because of major adverse effects on the area, and we are aware that these sentiments are shared by many of our neighbors. The residents who submitted the petition discussed their plans with us at some length. They were sympathetic to our problem, and it was for this reason that their petition proposed construction of a sidewalk from 56th Street to Wooddale Lane only. We point out that a narrow pedestrian sidewalk currently exists over the existing vehicular bridge, and that we have maintained a gravel pathway along our property at the. edge of Wooddale Avenue. These walkways seem perfectly adequate to handle existing pedestrian traffic between Wooddale Lane and St. Stephen's, although the issue of.snow.removal from these areas in the winter needs to be addressed. We hope that this information will useful in your deliberations: Sincerely, Catherine Niewoehner Dennis Niewoehner 5009 Wooddale Lane 1 Dear neighbors: March 12, 1991 . We are Edina homeowners residing at 5009 Wooddale Lane. (at the corner of Wooddale Lane and Wooddale Avenue, immediately adjacent to the bridge across Minnehaha Creek). We are writing in reference to a proposal before the City Council to construct a concrete walkway from the existing sidewalk in front of St. Stephen's Church across Minnehaha Creek and south along the east side of Wooddale Avenue to 56th Street. The sidewalk proposed by the City Engineering Department would be five feet wide along its entire length and would abut the curb. Because of the narrowness of the bridge crossing Minnehaha Creek, a separate, free - standing, steel pedestrian bridge would be installed immediately to the east of the existing vehicular bridge. Because our property would be adversely affected by this project, we wish to explain our concerns. (1) The area east of the bridge contains mature trees. We have added shrubs, ground cover and flower gardens, and have landscaped the creek embankment with large field stones so that the area blends nicely with the stone bridge. It is readily visible from the street and from St. Stephen's and from our house. ,Installation of a steel pedestrian bridge would be aesthetically offensive. Depending on the exact site, construction of a pedestrian bridge would either require removal of two mature trees immediately adjacent to the present bridge on our side of the creek and two younger trees on the St: Stephen's side or require intruding further into our backyard and St. Stephen's property to swing around the trees. (2) Adjacent to Wooddale Avenue, between the street and a hedge set back 12 feet, we have established a large flower garden over the past 10 years. We believe that our garden does make .a contribution to the beauty of the neighborhood, and we receive many comments to that effect from neighbors, church - goers, and passing pedestrians and motorists. Installation of.a five foot wide sidewalk would markedly reduce the area available for a garden, and its construction would have a devastating effect on the remainder. Several years ago we planted two Norway maples along the street to replace diseased elms, and these trees have grown to a substantial size. They are located about six feet from the curbing, and we believe that construction of the sidewalk would threaten their viability. (3) Although we feel that the present proposal is unacceptable, we are sympathetic to the idea of improved pedestrian access along a busy street would be happy to discuss how this might be accomplished. The residents who submitted the originl petition for a sidewalk understood our concerns and agreed to petition for construction of a sidewalk from 56th Street to Wooddale Lane only. We point out that a narrow pedestrian sidewalk currently exists over the existing vehicular bridge, and that we have maintained a gravel pathway along our property at the edge of Wooddale Avenue. These walkways seem perfectly adequate to handle existing pedestrian traffic between Wooddale Lane and St. Stephen's, although the issue of snow removal from these areas in the winter needs to be addressed. If you share our reservations about the sidewalk and bridge as currently proposed, please come to the City Council meeting on Monday, March 18, at 7:00 p.m. or communicate with a City Council member soon. The City Council members are: Mayor Fred Richards (941- 7626), Peggy Kelly (920- 0687), Jane Paulus (920- 9079), Jack Rice (927- 8372), Glen Smith (941- 6767). Sincerely, Denni d Cathe i e Niewoehner c i�, ,l�u�- u� -�n�Q lzicv�.e� -�iJ At� 0 sl,�e — 4L, 0 0 � • Jeanne K. Hanson Literary Agent 5111 Wooddale Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 922-9471 C&i. Ll /� ' 5- c -e MAR 15 '91 11:40 SECURITY DEVELOPMENT 941 5492 P.1 /1 postal° brand — T Na of Pages Toda Date 'Fax ransmittal Memo 7672: ! s�- /s , Tim 1U ox ito rn To - - - -- �.__. cECUF;mr EVE�oPME� ro., ANC. ' • t.oe'awnT� 'OFF:iCc•RFDQE • '`� - .._ .............,,.... , ....__._. . - .:i c .� 4 Fug To W&V a "O So Z Comments '� Oeavoy Rerum E]Caeforpiek p DispOSltion' - -... I March 15, 1991 EDINA CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE:, PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG WOODDALE AVENUE. Dear Council Members: My wife Kate, our two children, and I reside at 4504 Lakeview Drive near the intersection of Lakeview Drive and Wooddale. We are in strong support of sidwalks being located along Wooddale Avenue to 50th.' Last summer our six year old son was biking along Wooddale when his front tire got caught in a sewer grate resulting in a fall and eleven stitches. Although we realize sidewalks are not for biking, an alternative for our son would have been to walk his bike along on a sidewalk, if one had been available. There currently does not exist an easy way to get from our residence to Wooddale Park via walking. Given the traffic situation, it obviously makes for a very dangerous hike.. We are in strong support of the proposed sidewalk. Thank you. Sincerely, Dewey and Kate Johnson Council Agenda Item II.A , 9,t- ILL, " �L ���r -. emu; �� �� �� ;�- �� -'�-�v Cvz��� e_tA �Ze!(— (over) (nano) v' �j:So o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # III. A. From: KRIS AAKER Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: B -91 -2, U.S. WEST ❑ To Council NEWVECTOR GROUP, 5600 LINCOLN DRIVE Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of attached Findings, Decisions and Reasons. Info /Background: The attached Findings were prepared in response to Council action of March 4, 1991. Copies of the Findings have been delivered to the Proponent's Attorney and Architect, and the neighborhood contact. CITY OF EDINA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION _U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR GROUP 5600 LINCOLN DRIVE B -91 -21 VARIANCE REQUEST FINDINGS, DECISION, AND REASONS The above entitled matter was heard before the City Council on March 4, 1991, and March 18, 1991. U.S. West NewVector Group ( "The Proponent ") was represented by David Larson (Proponents Attorney) and Robert Davis (Proponents Architect.) The City Council, having heard and reviewed all of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, the Proponent's Architect, City Staff, and property owners in the vicinity of the Subject Property (below defined) , and having heard and reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent, the Proponent's Attorney, Proponents Architect, City Staff and property owners, and being fully advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following: . FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Proponent, on January 23, 1991, submitted an application for a 64 .foot front yard setback variance and a 23 foot height variance for an antenna tower, and a 16 foot front yard.setback variance for a utility building to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, Prestige 2nd Addition ( "Subject Property "), An existing industrial use building is located on the Subject Property. The Subject Property is zoned P.I.D., Planned Industrial District. According to City records the Subject Property is owned by Michael N. Orren. 1 2. The variance request ( "Proposed Variance ") delineated a proposed 98 foot tall monopole antenna tower and a 12' X 36' prefabricated equipment building to be installed near the base of the antenna. Both structures would be located in the Southeast corner of the Subject Property. 3. Edina Ordinance No. 812 (the "Antenna Ordinance ") states that no antenna may be erected without first making an application for and obtaining from the City a.permit. The following requirements of the Antenna Ordinance are necessary to obtain a permit in the Planned Industrial District: (a) No antenna, no tower and no tower with an antenna shall exceed.. 75 feet in height, measured from the base of the tower or antenna, whichever is lower, to the highest point of the antenna or tower, whichever is higher. (b) No part of any tower or- antenna shall be constructed, located or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within any setback required by the Zoning Ordinance for a principal building or structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna or tower is located. 2 Within the PID districts, principal buildings or structures must be setback 50 feet from the front lot line or building height whichever is greater. The definition of building height includes structures. Therefore, the proposed 98 foot tall tower requires a setback of 98 feet. 4. Based upon the ordinance requirements the following variances are required for the Proponent to obtain an antenna permit in the Planned Industrial District: (a) A 2.3 foot height variance to allow an antenna tower to exceed the maximum allowable height of 75 feet. (b) A 64 foot front yard setback variance to allow the proposed antenna tower to be within 34 feet of the front lot line (c) A 16 foot front yard setback variance to allow an equipment building to be located within 34 feet of the front lot line. 5. Variances from the provisions of Ordinance No. 812 must be processed and granted or denied in the same manner as variances are handled under Edina Ordinance No. 825. Edina Ordinance No. 825, (the "Zoning Ordinance ") provides for variances from the requirements of the Ordinance, but only upon finding that "strict enforcement of this ordinance would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to, the petitioner's property and that the granting of said variances is in keeping with the spirit and intent, of this ordinance." Undue hardship is defined as`meaning "that the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this ordinance, the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to 'his property which were not created by the petitioner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property of its surroundings." The Zoning Ordinance goes on to state that economic considerations alone shall not constitute undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the Ordinance. 6. The Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments. (",The Board ") reviewed the Proposed Variance request at its February 7, •1991, meeting. In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance notice of public hearing wa's published in the Edina Sun Current and mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property. At the hearing the Proponent submitted that.the "plight" of the applicant was due to the location of the Subject Property, near Highway 169, and the need to locate antennas above the 90 foot 4 monopole tower so that the radio.signals have effective coverage. The Proponent added that the location of the equipment building is dictated by the available space on the Subject- Property, and the need to be close to the antenna. The Proponent stated that the variance is not caused by any action of the Proponent, but by unique characteristics of the Subject Property, and the engineering requirements to operate a functioning cell (i.e., the coverage of the antenna on the proposed tower). The Proponent contended that the required front yard setback is 50 feet, not the tower height as staff has interpreted the ordinance. Several affected property owners were present and spoke in, opposition ,to the variance request citing issues including negative visual impact, decreased property values, lack of demonstrated hardship and negative precedent which would be set if the proposed variance were approved. The. Board voted unanimously to deny the Proposed Variance for the following reasons: (a) The Proponent did not sufficiently demonstrate that the Subject Property could not be put to reasonable use without approval of the variance request. Conditions for requiring a variance are due to the nature of the cellular telephone business and not by conditions g 5 present on and unique to the site. (b) The antenna tower height is excessive and would have a negative visual impact on surrounding affected properties. (c) The Proponent did not adequately demonstrate that the size and location of the antenna were necessary for the functioning of cellular service and that the use is exclusive to the Subject Property. (d) A precedent would be established if the variances were to be approved allowing similar requests to be submitted. 7. On February 27, 1991, the Proponent appealed the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to the City Council. 8. On March 4, 1991, the Edina City Council conducted a public hearing concerning the appeal of the Board's decision. Pursuant to applicable City Ordinances notice of public hearing was published in the Edina Sun Current and mailed to property owners with 200 feet of the Subject Property. At said hearing, the Proponent showed. 0 1 computer enhanced graphics illustrating the anticipated appearance of the proposed tower and antenna from various locations east of the Subject Property. At said hearing, affected property owners testified.in opposition to the Proposed Variance. The City Council acknowledged a number of signed letters submitted'by property owners who reside in the vicinity all of which opposed the Proposed Variance. Among issues submitted in.oral and written testimony were damage to views, potential .interference of T.V. reception, possible health hazards, lack of demonstrated hardship, potential for setting a precedent, and loss of property values. The Proponent submitted a preliminary investigation from Cannery and Associates, Inc. real ,estate appraisers stating that in their opinion the monopole tower would have no measurable value impact on the affected properties. The Proponent stated that the Proposed Variance is the most ideal solution for Proponent to improve Proponent's cellular service. The City Council-,continued the variance hearing to March 18, 1991,. for review of written findings and for further Council action. . THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council does hereby make the following 7 Decision: The Proponent's request for the Proposed Variance'to construct an antenna and utility building at 5600 Lincoln Drive is hereby denied,. The decision of the, City Council is made for the following Reasons: A. Affected property owners in the vicinity of the Subject Property should have the right to presume that any variance from the Ordinance will be compatible with surrounding properties and with the spirit and intent of the applicable Ordinances. B. The Proponents have indicated that the Subject Property is, the most "ideal location" for their purposes. However, Proponent has not demonstrated the existence of undue hardship to support the Proposed Variance. Nor has it demonstrated that its plight is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property, not created by the Proponent. On the contrary, the Proponent's plight is due solely to circumstances created by Proponent, namely its desire to improve cellular telephone service., Also, the Subject Property, is presently being used as the location for an industrial use which is a reasonable use of the Subject Property which will continue to exist 8 4 under the - Zoning Ordinance even if the Proposed Variance is denied. C. The Proposed Variance would be materially detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to other property in the ' vicinity and zoning district. The Proposed Variance, if granted, would alter the existing character of the surrounding properties. D. Approval of the Proposed Variance would establish a precedent encouraging the construction of similar towers and antennas in other PID districts, contrary to the intent and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The Proponent has not adequately established that the antenna height and location are necessary for the improvement of cellular service. 9 A41 EKREM GOZUM, M.D. 6616 PARKWOOD ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 /k.4e67ivv� 00a yo ' Fo. eA, aAvu4-, 9-6150 ray Yk;'O' r, w91N��1'U O e v ay lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Subject: Z -91 -1, RMD, REGION MEDICAL TO POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT. 6525 DREW AVENUE. Recommendation: Agenda Item # T T T . B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion First Reading of rezoning from RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District. Info /Background: The Planning Commission considered the subject request at their February 28, 1991, meeting. They recommended approval of the rezoning with two changes: reducing the width of the drive -up teller driveway (north side) from 12 feet to 10 feet; and the provision of additional landscaping in the northwesterly portions of the site. The recommended changes have been -made and are reflected on the attached site plan. However, the new driveway still needs a setback variance from the north property line. The Commission recommended approval of the variance on the condition of continued occupancy of the building by this credit union. A change in use would trigger a review of the variance. H LOCATION MAP REZONING. NUMBER Z -91 -1 LOCATION 6525 , Drew Avenue R E O U E S T RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District EDINA PLANNING: D:ERARTMENI` w MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1991, 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, Virginia Shaw,. John Palmer, Charles Ingwalson, Helen McClelland, David Byron Lee Johnson, Nan Faust and Robert Hale MEMBERS ABSENT: Geof Workinger and David Runyan STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Shaw moved approval of the January 2, 1991, meeting minutes. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Commissioner Ingwalson requested that his name be included in the list of those present at the January 2, 1991 meeting. All voted aye; motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: Z -91 -1 RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District, Diversified Credit Union 6525 Drew Avenue South Lot 2, Block 2, Southdale Acres Mr. Larsen informed the Commission The subject property measures 140 by 200 and contains an area of 28,000 square feet and is zoned Regional Medical District, RMD. The property is developed with a single story office building containing approximately 3000 square feet of gross floor area. The entire building is presently utilized for medical office uses. Mr. Larsen explained a petition has been submitted requesting a rezoning from RMD, to POD -1, Planned Office District. The rezoning would allow partial occupancy of the building by Diversified Credit Union. Diversified is the Credit Union for employees of Minnegasco. The Credit Union would initially occupy about 40% of the space with the remainder continuing as medical space. The long term plan would be for the Credit Union to occupy the entire building. Mr. Larsen reported that the Regional Medical District allows hospitals, medical and dental offices and medical laboratories as principal uses. It does not allow general office or financial institutions except as' accessory uses in large buildings, over 40,000 square feet. The POD District allows general office and financial institutions, and also allows medical office uses. The rezoning would provide for an expansion of permitted uses, but would reduce the allowed intensity of development permitted. The Regional Medical District allows a FAR of 1.0 where the Planned Office District limits Floor Area Ratio to 0.5. Mr. Larsen pointed out required parking for a medical clinic is 5 per 1000 square feet plus one space for each physician. The subject building is 4500 square feet, including a partial basement and supports the practice of four doctor's. As currently used 27 spaces are required. Twenty -two spaces are provided. As an office /bank use the parking requirement is reduced to 21 spaces. The interim bank - medical use would require 24 spaces. The proposed site plan provides 21 spaces. Thus a 3 space parking variance is requested. The only significant change to the site will be the addition of the drive -up teller window on the northwesterly portion of the building. Cars would enter at the existing curb cut south of the building and, circulate through the parking lot to a new drive north of the building and'ultimately back to Drew Avenue. The new drive is setback three feet from the north property line where 10 feet is required. Thus, a 7 foot parking /drive aisle setback is. requested. Mr. Larsen 'concluded the proposed rezoning can be considered "down zoning" of the property. The proposed use is less intense than the existing use and the potential for intensifying the use is limited by the rezoning. The. new user, Diversified, is a low intensity operation that will not likely experience significant growth since only Minnegasco employees are eligible to join.. The credit union has a total of 2,800 members. The'proposed drive -up teller will reduce the possibility of parking shortages. Staff recommends the rezoning from RMD to POD -1. Conditions for approval are: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Signage subject to staff approval Mr. Ron Berg and Dick Haas, were present representing Diversified Credit Union. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen if the proposed use is less intense then the RMD zoning. Mr. Larsen said is correct. Commissioner McClelland questioned the width of the proposed drive aisle (north side) , commenting if it is 12 feet in width as depicted, it really doesn't need to be that wide. Chairman Johnson also questioned if the drive aisle is to be one -way. Mr. Larsen explained that the drive aisle as proposed is 12 feet wide and traffic circulates one -way. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained the City requires at a minimum a 10 foot wide drive aisle. Commissioner Hale questioned Mr. Larsen if the proponent's have considered other alternatives to the drive -up window and circulation, he also questioned if this proposal creates another curb cut. Mr. Larsen said he believes the proponents have considered other alternatives, but the one proposed best addresses traffic circulation. Mr. Larsen said another curb cut will be added because of the,'drive -up window. Commissioner Shaw inquired if it would be possible to move the drive -up window. Commissioner Hale agreed, and asked if the drive -up window could be moved to the south side of the building. Mr. Larsen explained at this time that would be impossible. At present, the building is being shared with the remaining physician, who offices on the south side of the building.. Commissioner L. Johnson said he has a problem with the site's present development, and questioned if the site 'is at present non- conforming. He explained he has a concern regarding the drive -up window and lack of adequate space. Continuing, he inquired if the site is rezoned, will it always remain a.bank.- Mr. Larsen explained that Commissioner Johnson is correct in his assumption that the site is currently non - conforming. He informed the Commission they could recommend as a condition of approval that the rezoning runs with the use of the proponent. Commisioner L. Johnson observed that the adjoining driveway could be used as a common driveway for both sites. Mr. Larsen said that is a possibility, but cautioned that .property owners seem to be very particular about their own parking areas. Mr. Berg with graphics explained to the Commission traffic flow and stacking space. He pointed out their intent with the proposed design was to keep vehicle stacking out of parking space. Mr. Haas related at present Minnegasco operates their credit unit with secured hours. The proposed facility will provide an expansion of those hours for members. Operational hours would be daily, 9:00 or 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m., and half -day on Saturday. Commissioner Faust questioned Mr. Haas on the number of employees that would operate the credit union. Mr. Haas said he believes the facility merits three full -time employees and two part -time employees. Continuing, Commissioner Faust told the Commission in her experience she has found parking at this site to be very congested. She added with parking already tight, and with another curb cut, the proposal would increase vehicular traffic, especially with the drive -up window. Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Haas if only one physician would continue to occupy the building, or if the remaining physician has an option to include more physicians or pass his space on. Commissioner L. Johnson interjected if the credit union has designs on eventually occupying the entire building. In response to Commissioner's Hale and Johnson's questions Mr. Haas explained that the remaining physician will occupy the facility until age 70, or death, whichever comes first. He added it is the intent of the credit union to occupy the entire building. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Haas how many employees now use the credit union. Mr. Haas informed the Commission the credit union has 2,800 members. Commissioner L. Johnson said he is generally uncomfortable with the proposal. He inquired what would happen if someone would like to rezone it back to RMD. Mr. Larsen explained if that would happen the future proponent would have to seek a variance. Continuing, Mr. Larsen suggested that the variances be granted with the condition if the use changes the City would require any future occupant to come back before the Commission and Council. Commissioner L. Johnson pointed out, as proposed, there is a large amount of asphalt on site, and questioned if there is a real need for a drive -up window. Commissioner Ingwalson pointed out the Commission could view the drive -up window as a solution that alleviates the parking demand. Chairman Johnson, agreed and said patrons of the credit union or any banking facility, for that matter, usually do not want to leave their cars if they are provided with a drive -up window. Mr. Bierdsdorf, told the Commission. in his opinion the site has problems with parking because of the demand for free parking in the area. He added many patrons of the hospital and medical clinic prefer to park free, and park wherever they can find free parking. Commissioner Faust interjected that in her opinion parking has always been a problem at this site. Mr. Larsen clarified for the Commission staff's position on the intensity of medical /dental office use versus straight office use. He added it has always been the belief of staff that medical use is the more intense use of the two. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend' preliminary rezoning approval with subject variances and the additional conditions that the proposed drive aisle (north side) be narrowed from 12 to 10 feet, landscaping be intensified to provide improved screening, and that the variances granted be conditioned on the; use of the proponent. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. A discussion ensued with the Commission discussing the merits of the drive -up window. Ayes, Johnson, McClelland, Palmer, Shaw, Ingwalson, G. Johnson, Nays, Hale, Faust. Motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 27, 1991 Z -91 -1 RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District, Diversified Credit Union 6525 Drew Avenue South Lot 2, Block 2,.Southdale Acres The subject property measures 140 by 200 and contains an area of 28,000 square feet and is zoned Regional Medical District, RMD. The property is developed with a single story office building containing approximately 3000 square feet of gross floor area. The entire building is presently utilized for medical office uses. A petition has been submitted requesting a rezoning from RMD, to POD -1, Planned Office District: The rezoning would allow partial occupancy of the building by. Diversified Credit Union. Diversified is the Credit Union for employees of Minnegasco. The Credit Union would initially occupy about 40% of the space with the remainder continuing as medical space. The long term plan would be for the Credit Union to occupy the entire building. The Regional Medical District allows hospitals, medical and dental offices and medical laboratories as principal uses. It does not allow general office or financial institutions except as accessory uses in large buildings, over 40,000 square feet. The POD District allows general office and .financial institutions, and also allows medical office uses. The rezoning would provide for an expansion of permitted uses, but would reduce the allowed intensity of development permitted. The Regional Medical District allows a FAR of 1.0 where the Planned Office District limits Floor Area Ratio to 0.5. Required parking for a medical clinic is 5 per 1000 square feet plus one space for each physician. The subject building is 4500 ,square' feet, including a partial basement and supports the practice of four doctor's. As currently used 27 spaces are required. Twenty-two, spaces are provided. As an office /bank use the parking requirement is reduced to 21 spaces. The interim bank - medical use would require 24 spaces. The proposed site plan provides 21 spaces. Thus a 3 space parking variance is requested. The only, significant change to the site will be the addition. of the drive -up teller window, on the northwesterly portion of the building. Cars would enter at�the existing curb cut south of the building and circulate through the parking lot to a new drive north of the building and ultimately back to Drew Avenue. The new drive is setback three. feet from the north property line where 10 feet is required. Thus, a 7 foot parking /drive aisle setback is requested. Recommendation: The proposed rezoning' can be considered "down zoning" of the property. The proposed use is less intense than the existing use and the potential for intensifying the use is limited by the rezoning. The new user, Diversified, is a low intensity operation that will not likely experience significant growth since only Minnegasco employees are eligible to.join. The credit union has a total of 2,800 members. The proposed drive -up teller will reduce the possibility of parking shortages. Staff recommends the rezoning from RMD to POD -1. Conditions for approval are: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Signage subject to staff approval Iln ♦ ,' r 1uT - J3g�_ - -' r YO 0 1 CD I CD Im !tn im Ilm 00 O ` ` GUT. 41PEgf!1"J I I I I �8HG7U3T � . 'L jEe_ (6�0tiJ GUY. e e5.2a 77 886.59 - -I = _ _ - 7.07 U5.7 0 DLGHT 88 1TC. PUUE - - - - - - — - - - - - -- =--- ---E - 1 7, / _ _ _ I.° I / - - - �MIA:(il- - +_ ' �95i(i v -TREE ' 1 1 , • I GUY v - _— ---- -- _ .1. _ _` �'� DGE O1 T. OeFro 11 IWIRL 1 I ' I o.c GUpprrb,• 11 � •� , I I P 10'7'0-T � I O .1 A c1vDEIJ5o1�/,` 1 n „N NF oNIT 1 1 IF I to +� Im r ` fp, JAI AN 'Pu10P • _ .'` I hl - 00p a 884.6 m ,ir- !. - • I f0' D1A.E�- I• ( \EaKlnls yyfJ1�•�P1oJf ' w Qb � I I 611AFAL6/ fEP�IF Mlr' 0 I I 1 `� /' 41. e' rtREE(E7a5j) r \i• - 1 I °Iq 1 �' •t 1, • f �luotATB IA,j EX1511TJ4 1 ILOf Uf•Mj ll°T Y 4 u I 1 1 fl, COURTYARD CPNC TE S 1 0 1 o mI I m 1 tY„ 1 frCNN i�LObt f�E : F. ALX I Id IEbL 1CD 1 I ' 1 N 1 I dti 1 ,DAD .0.d /II LOO R t ADD PRoifr•T. " \-"� 1 MWO A90-4 W 'I ADOoAR� �T �III'.liDe ,4' TREE. ♦ ♦♦ �1` `5``HG 6V ` ?�P I r U it "I r lL•CO�1GLElE) I ♦♦ \ E"+ � A. L. Z I ♦ , > I I �.B�S` RrdIT 41 Q �I 1 II ♦♦ `S ♦`♦ FLOORS i i 1 �eS ♦ 886.54 - / 884.5 1 0 w 1 I� ♦ ♦♦•�♦ i', i r cr r ♦ �� ' i / u Ilm I..Enbillp 5160 '7 b: `♦ . SB6R6 ,89 m PEHNcA1 ID ♦ ♦ �7 < '__ -_(�'.- ♦ 3' TREE Ia0 110I HAl1 4 "COIL'. TJ/ 6w •Ip/19 I 1 r . G 1111% µf110 INTO rq6 ' ,' ,~ o�oF• r 1 CONCRETE SIDEIIALK/ fEP,IR � GGH �I w DLE I I . � -- --�, ` I • 15' T E 00 w S TAN 0 IS' TREE 22' EE r 1 ,6 TREE ♦ ♦ B6 4 Ia c -- o '� ' tF TRE E EE -- ---- -- w T. C. I.C. ioa BBA` 884.59 I - .- -- G11T. _ GUT. 4 GONE. i I 8H4 04 B84 10 - I 1 H -- �- PROPF TY_LINE -' 1 B133.45 1 • ��,� iiiIA j�NOA7Q iacj P- 1�If14 v�'wi 9r�l,Ki -' 4N�M,Y}f 7H �qr 012 kiliv I !r•,a cl c d11Ja wvara ;' � �Iryryu 9rN>l 03 v ��I 031d�rn in0 ioc>I rArw%, nzv4 orel-ArsJ 41nAIi 9Nlhsni 9r114�+i -- .. t., •'fit /� j � 9�i�N111 AA d I i ANINarli , -- - - - - - - - -- -- - 0 a•iw'�naP 1 I %Al.� aaw� adu.nt V7 �� �r�'79r! -- �oJ - -- - \p1 1s ��I M+1ry Ol 7Mfi nnryrypp 9rIMY1i 91111,1 +7 igorl d�111 B ry7N D•,y 11�, �„1.NN= \01�jviNThl�rl��l I oil • A•,Is.�/ �1v�o rn��a 1vl �r� I N,MI� ,ormu, �qr 012 kiliv I !r•,a cl c d11Ja wvara ;' � �Iryryu 9rN>l 03 v ��I 031d�rn in0 ioc>I rArw%, nzv4 orel-ArsJ 9Nlhsni 9r114�+i -- .. t., •'fit /� j •.ao �qr 012 kiliv I !r•,a cl c d11Ja wvara ;' � �Iryryu 9rN>l 03 v ��I 031d�rn in0 P A U L L A R S O N I ' FOB—GYN CLINIC, P.A. March 12, 1991 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Case File Z -91 -1 Diversified Credit Union 6525 Drew Avenue South Lot 2, Block 4 of Southdale Acres Gentlemen: The undersigned, all being partners in Coppertop Properties, the entity owning the .building adjacent on the North to 6525 Drew Avenue South, and all being practitioners of medicine,,practicing,as the Paul Larson Ob -Gyn Clinic, P.A., located only at 6517 Drew Avenue South, ask your consideration of the following with regard to Case File Z -91 -1: A. The general area has been zoned RMD, Regional Medical District, at least since 1968, when the Paul Larson Ob-Gyn Clinic; PA. purchased the land and began construction of our practice site. B. Rezoning one segment of the property in the RMD to a lower intensity usage could adversely affect property values of contiguous and /or neighboring properties. C. The already- limited on- street parking on the East side of Drew Avenue South, between 65th and 66th Streets will be even more severely limited, adding to cost and control problems of neighboring properties. D. Aesthetically, an additional 12 -foot wide driveway between the existing buildings (6517 and 6525 Drew Avenue South) will tend to give the appearance of a section of freeway suddenly translocated to an area of small well- maintained buildings. PAUL LARSON OB -GYN CLINIC, P.A 6517 Drew Avenue South Edina. Minnesota 55435 (612) 927 -4021 Shuneui Chun. M.D. Maria A. Cromer, M.D. Paul A. Jensen, M.D. William C. Meyer, M.D. Robert R. Meal. Jr., M.D. GunardA. Meson, M.D. Oliver H. Peterson. Jr., M.D. Douglas M. Soderberg, M.D. _ E. Thomas Lielft. Administrator March 12, 1991 City of Edina Planning Department Page two We are opposed to the rezoning proposal and respectfully request your reasoned consideration of the points mentioned in this letter. If there is additional information needed, please let us know. Sincerely, Sh neui Chun, M.D. 5701 Long Brake Trail Edina,, MN 55435 Maria A. Cremer, M.D. 5228 KellcfRg Avenue�outh Ed, 55424 \ Paul A. nsen, -M.D. 7445 W Shore Drive Edina./ 55435 William C. Meyer, M.D. 6517 Cherokee Trail Edina, MN 55435 /1"I'L "--� , Robert R. Neal, Jr., M.D. 6808 Dakota'Trail Edi MN 55435 ou nard A. Nelson, M.D. 5515 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 Douglas M. Sode erg,-M.D. 6424 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55435 ,:. o e F_V • , `�fl�BMI�O/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Subject: S-91-1, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, BRENNAN ADDITION. 6425 INDIAN HILLS ROAD. Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the preliminary plat as illustrated by the attached revised preliminary plat. Info /Background: The attached preliminary plat incorporates the changes ordered by the Planning Commission. As revised the preliminary plat meets the 500 foot standards for lot width, lot depth and lot area, as well as lot width to perimeter ratio. No variances are required. Please note that the revised plat will require removal of the existing swimming pool. 0 LOCATION MAP C40JLEr MFST CROSSVIE UTMERA.. ` r•f,,REf.K, ^VJ�IIE?Y. l , • _ 'P #RK CREEK VI .. T ELEM. MI L• 1% uRey� I1 —'—!ST LB EPISCOF SUBDIVISION NUMBER 5 -91 -1 L O C A T 10 N 6425 Indian Hills Road REQUEST Create one new buildable lot EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF 2/27/91 5 -91 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval Brennan Addition Lot 5, Block 7, Indian Hills Joseph and Betty Brennan 6425 Indian Hills Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 86,171 square feet. The lot is a "Thru -lot", having frontage on two public streets. The existing home is developed and has access on the easterly side of the site. Mr. Larsen explained a preliminary plat has been submitted requesting a division of the property which would create one, new buildable lot. Lot 1, the new.lot, would contain 31,830 square feet, and Lot 2, would contain an area of 54,340 square feet. Mr. Larsen pointed out as .proposed Lot 1, the new lot, would not meet the neighborhood median lot depth or lot area standards. Lot 2 would exceed all neighborhood medians for size and dimensions. Continuing, Mr. Larsen told the Commission the entire area of the new lot exhibits slopes exceeding 18 percent. The majority of the lot contains 30% slopes. The impact of development should be considered when development impacts more than 25% of area of the lot containing steep slopes. Mr. Larsen concluded that as proposed the division of property is uneven due to the location of an existing swimming. pool. This uneven division causes the new lot to fall below the neighborhood median for lot depth and lot area. Also, the relatively shallow depth of the lot reduces flexibility in siting a new'home on a lot with very steep slopes. If the common rear lot line were moved to the easterly edge of the pool the variances would be eliminated and siting flexibility for the new home would be increased. 'With careful and sensitive development this could be an outstanding home site. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the following changes and conditions: 1. Adjusting common rear lot line to easterly edge of pool, and removal of existing pool. 2. Final Plat Approval. 3. Subdivision dedication for one new lot. 4. Utility connection charges. The proponent Mrs. Brennan, her daughters, Mr. Bob Deike, Proponents Attorney, and interested neighbors were present. Mr. Deike told Commission Members he supports staff conditions, except for the condition to remove the pool. He explained the Brennans enjoy the pool, and the pool adds substantial value to the Brennan home. Mr. Deike suggested realigning the new lot lines to form a "V ". This would allow the Brennans to retain their pool, and solve the issue of the proposed lots substandard area and depth as it compares to lots within the neighborhood. Chairman Johnson said that he understands the desire of the Brennans to retain their pool, but added, the City is not in the habit of creating odd shape lots. Continuing,-Chairman Johnson said if the lot lines for the proposed lot were realigned to form a deeper "V" the steep slopes would make it virtually impossible for the new property owner to maintain those points of property. Commissioner Palmer added he agreed with Chairman Johnson's observation, pointing out in a sense what is being requested is a deepening of the "V ". Mr. Deike responded that that is correct. Commissioner McClelland told the Commission she does not favor approval of a substandard lot. She added realigning the lot lines of the new lot to achieve the required lot size as suggested by Mr. Deike does not make good planning sense. All that would accomplish is points. of land sticking up into the hill and the perception that those points of land belong with the Brennan property. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland added another concern is driveway placement. She pointed out the proposed driveway will be located in the vicinity of the intersection of Indian Hills Road and Dakota Trail, which creates a safety issue. Commissioner McClelland recommended that . -the driveway be constructed with adequate turn - around space allowing vehicles to enter Indian Hills Road front first. Commissioner McClelland questioned if the proposed lot would be developed with a switch- back driveway. Mr. Larsen explained the topography of the lot creates a situation that may make it necessary to create a switch -back driveway. Mr. Larsen said he agrees with Commissioner McClelland's. observation that vehicles should enter the street front first. Commissioner Ingwalson pointed out the area in question has been developed with homes of a large scale, and to approve a lot that does not meet the neighborhood size standards would be a mistake. He added the conditions recommended by staff for the pool to be removed and the lot line realigned creates a more substantial lot. Lee Brennan, 6425 Indian Hills Road, pointed out to the Commission that the Brennan property is one of the largest properties in the area. She added when platted her father chose to buy more land to create their present lot. She explained at that time property was quite cheap and the larger lot afforded her family privacy. Ms. Brennan added that the pool has been an important part of their property and requested that the Commission allow the pool to remain. Mr. Larsen explained from staffIs- perspective removal of the pool, and the realigning of the proposed new lot line, increases the size of the lot, and affords the future property owners flexibility in house placement. Mr. Larsen pointed out the steepness of the property warrants an increase in lot size from what is proposed. Mrs. Brennan told the Board the reason.she is before them this evening is that for a number of years 'she has been approached by developers to obtain and divide her property. Continuing, Mrs. Brennan explained to the Board that Dr. Brennan has been ill and at this time she is handling his affairs. She stated she is willing to answer any questions the Commission may have.. regarding this property. Commissioner L. Johnson said he believes the reason the Brennan property was platted as depicted is due to the severity of slopes on the lot. He added another concern of his is the safety issue regarding the ingress /egress for the proposed lot., Commissioner L. Johnson added he has a problem approving the proposed subdivision for these reasons. Chairman G. Johnson referred to a letter submitted at the meeting from property owners at 6512 and 6541 Navaho Trail. Chairman Johnson said the content of the letter refers to the unkept Brennan property, and questioned if the monies realized from the subdivision would be used to correct the appearance of the Brennan property. Mrs. Brennan responded to the letter from neighbors by explaining at this time she and her children are beginning to clear and clean the property. Commissioner Palmer acknowledged Mrs. Brennans response adding in his opinion the focus of the Planning Commission is the subdivision of the property. A discussion ensued with the Commission agreeing that staff's conditions to remove the pool and to realign the lot line for the proposed new lot is what is needed to create the new lot. The steep slopes of the site must be considered and a substandard lot cannot be supported. Commissioner Ingwalson asked if the lot line is realigned as proposed by staff, what would the increase it lot area amount to. Mr. Larsen said he believes that the increase in lot area would be in excess of 3,500 square feet. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend subdivision approval subject to staff conditions, with the further condition that realignment of the proposed new lot line should be established by connecting a line parallel with the northwesterly line of the lot at.238.47 feet and -the southwesterly line of lot at 152.37 feet, the swimming pool must be removed and the drive -way constructed must enable vehicles to enter. the street front first. Commissioner -Shaw seconded the motion. Commissioner L. Johnson said he still•has a problem with the steep slopes, building pad placement and a egress /ingress . He concluded that he cannot support the proposal as presented., Ayes; Hale, McClelland, Faust, Palmer, Shaw, Byron, Ingwalson, G. Johnson, Nay, L. Johnson. Motion carried. Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Proposed Lot 1 Proposed Lot 2 Lot Arek Lot Width Lot Depth COMPARISON FOR. REVISED PLAT a MEDIAN LOT COMPARISON Neighborhood Data for Figured Median of Brennan Subdivision Lots within 500' Actual Area Actual Area of Proposed of Proposed of Proposed Subdivision Lot 1 Lot 2 SQUARE FT DEPTH WIDTH 15000 120 55 15200 120 100 16000 125 100 33,500 37,998 48,173 16700 130 105 17200 135 110 165 feet 195 feet 208 feet 17500 140 110 18600 140 110 200 feet 225 feet 255 feet 18750 140 115 ' 19500 150 115 20000 150 115 LOT WIDTH TO PERIMETER RATIO 21000 160 120 23500 170 120 24000, 170 130 24000 175 '135 Width Perimeter} Ratio 24500 180 150 25000 180 150 26500 180 150 195 ft. 795 ft. .25 27000 190 150 29300 190 155 30000 190 208 ft. 869 ft. .24 .31500 200 33500 200 Lo5 34300 200 170 AVERAGE LOT COMPARISON 38000 200 170 38500 210 170 40000 210 180 41700 210 185 Figured Average 44330 220 185 of Lots within Actual Area Actual Area 45400 250 190 500' of Proposed - of Proposed of Proposed 46400 250 195 Subdivision Lot 1 Lot 2 46800 270 200 46800 270 205 47700 275 215 36,357 37,998 48,173 50200 280 225 51500 290 240 55400 290 250 175 ft. 195 ft. 208 ft. 57000 300 250 57500 320 250 213 ft. 225 ft. 255 ft. 61700 330 260 64000 340 290 81500 350 315 84000 360 430 EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND•PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 27, 1991 S -91 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval Brennan Addition - -Lot 5,. Block 7, Indian Hills Joseph and Betty Brennan 6425 Indian Hills Road The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 86,171 square feet. The lot is a "Thru -lot ", having frontage on two public streets. The existing home is developed and has access on the easterly side of the site. A preliminary plat has been submitted requesting a division of the property which would create one, new buildable lot. Lot 1, the -new lot, contains 31,830 square feet and Lot 2, would contain an area of 54,340 square feet. Comparison to lots within the 500 foot neighborhood as required by Ordinance'No. 804, the Subdivision Ordinance. .500 Foot Neighborhood Median Lot Width 165 Feet Median Lot Depth 200 Feet Median Lot Area 33,500 Square Feet Proposed Brennan Addition Lots Lot 1 Lot. 2 Lot Width 190 Sq. Ft. 195 Sq. Ft. Lot Depth 170 Sq. Ft. 300 Sq. Ft. Lot Area 31,830 Sq. Ft. 54,340 Sq. Ft. Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio (0.1 or greater required) .25 .20 Note:. Dimension figures provided by surveyor are incorrect. Please refer to above staff generated measurements. As proposed Lot 1, the new lot, would not meet the neighborhood median lot depth or lot area standards. Lot 2 would exceed all neighborhood medians for size and dimensions. The entire area of the new lot exhibits slopes exceeding 18 percent. The majority of the lot contains 30% slopes. The impact of development should be considered when development impacts more than 25% of area of the lot containing steep slopes. Recommendation: As proposed the division of property is uneven due to the location of an existing swimming pool. This uneven division causes the new lot to fall below the neighborhood median for lot depth and lot area. Also, the relatively shallow depth of the lot reduces flexibility in siting a new home on a lot with very steep slopes. If the common rear lot line were moved to the easterly edge of the pool the variances would be eliminated and siting flexibility for the new home would be increased. With careful and sensitive development this could be an outstanding home site. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the following changes and conditions: 1. Adjusting common rear lot line to easterly edge of pool, and removal of existing pool. 2. Final.Plat Approval. 3. Subdivision dedication for,one new lot. 4. Utility connection charges. Elizabeth Brennan 6425 Indian Hills Road Edina, MN 55439 February 14, 1991 Re: Lot.Subdivision — 6425 Indian Hills Road, Edina, MN Dear Neighbor: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that I have applied for approval from the City of Edina to subdivide the lot located at the above address. As many of you are aware my husband, Joseph, and I have been residents of the Indian Hills neighborhood for over thirty years. Recent events have made it necessary that we undertake this subdivision. My subdivision proposal as submitted to the City of Edina involves the splitting of my lot at 6425 Indian Hills Road into two lots. A legal description of my lot is contained on the attachment to this letter. The lot as presently configured consists of 86,171 square feet. After the subdivision, the two lots would be 31,830 square feet and 54,341 square feet in size. A plat drawing showing -the proposed lot.split may be seen at the City Planning Department or if you would like to call me at 941 -5243 I would be happy to arrange an opportunity for you to see the preliminary plat and discuss my proposal. This subdivision 'proposal will be considered by the Edina City Planning Commission on February 27, 1991. That meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. and will be held in the Edina City Council chambers at 4801 West 50th Street in Edina. Information pertaining to the public hearing schedule and process is available from the City Planning Department at 927 - 8861.' In arriving at our decision to configuration of that subdivision, any potential adverse impact on believe that the proposed subdiv which preserves the unique nature be happy to discuss this with you. Sincerely, Betty Brennan subdivide this lot and the we have attempted to minimize surrounding properties. I ision is a logical one and one of the neighborhood. I would ORIGINAL PAPOSAL j T E.,CEP v V4,Lo "'94 V", Z4 V "4- t 1. f q V1, Vvy k, , � !l 5,00" two C:b v, & VI 1: 111 IrI •Inlr 1110 nplrNl PR E L I M IN A RY PLAT BRENNAN ADDITION 11 /l qla rlllq 0.11 01 •I llaa F qf PnPEU FOu DR. JOSEPH 9 BETTY BRENNAN ic — •7 2 X.- M—1 W A.W 142-1. u I Ulm I": un _wm I VI 1: 111 IrI •Inlr 1110 nplrNl PR E L I M IN A RY PLAT BRENNAN ADDITION 11 /l qla rlllq 0.11 01 •I llaa F qf PnPEU FOu DR. JOSEPH 9 BETTY BRENNAN ®fir 1. 140 I rr r L 1 A / SU �C AVERAGE NEIGHBORHOOD LOT AREA- DEPTH -WIDTH Y PREPARED FOR- JOSEPH 9 BETTY BRENNAN } !' U f. 4: 4—. I A ,Y J .ti .. Ojlfa/I�e� 101 0�/ /t/� •.,,, r• w —W all in at 1. .wrY W N/, /: 1,1 1// Nf,/ FMMQ rV • •_LW S y,L M11ry V 1: IM h1 N. . M( In. r Y PREPARED FOR- JOSEPH 9 BETTY BRENNAN } I 4 &Hi. I k Rea Rear 1 In , ' sed building s LEGAL DESCRIPTION PIS} NO. tab- -I-I- EXISTING ZONING R-1 Single ,i� 1-1, >4� o J • ,NCb l ooBeMl�O� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # Iv• A-, B., C. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Mgr. . Recommends 9 ❑ To HRA P Subject: 0 To Council Ordinance No. 902 -A10 - To Allow Sale of Intoxicating Malt Liquor at On -Sale Ordinanca No. 902 -A8 - To Eliminat Requirement for Bond, Require Sale of Food with Sale of Non - Intoxicat Malt Liquor, Update References to State Statutes, Provide Licensing erm OT April 1 - Apri Action, ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Ordinance No. 902 -A9 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 as Presently Amended Recommendation: Grant first reading -to Edina Ordinance No. 902 -A10, Ordinance No. 902 -A8, Ordinance 902 -A9. Staff recommends that second reading be waived for Ordinance Nos. 902 -A8 and 902 -A9. Info/Background- In accordance with your direction of March 4, 1991, staff has prepared a draft of Ordinance No. 902 -A10, Allowing the Sale of Intoxicating Malt Liquor at On -Sale. The Ordinance provides that in order to'sell intoxicating malt liquor, an establishment must possess the following three licenses: 1) An On -Sale Wine License, 2) An On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor License, 3) A Food Establishment License. In addition, the establishment must post the necessary insurance certificates or provide evidence allowing them to obtain a waiver from the insurance requirements. In accordance with statutory requirements, the draft ordinance provides that at least 60% of the gross receipts of the establishment must be attributable to the sale of food. The licensee is required to submit affidavits confirming that the 60% standard has been met. The City Clerk may require that this affidavit be verified and confirmed by a CPA. Report /Recommendation /Ordinances 902 -A10, 902 -A8, 902 -A9 March 18, 1991 Page Two The draft ordinance amendment also provides that the service of intoxicating malt liquor must meet the same requirements as the service of wine. Specifically, the draft ordinance requires that a meal must be ordered to be consumed with the intoxicating malt liquor, and that no sale or consumption of intoxicating malt liquor will be permitted at a bar. During the course of our preparation of draft ordinance No. 902 - A10, we determined that some provisions of our liquor ordinance should be amended from a housekeeping standpoint. Ordinance No. 902 -A8 proposes to, 1) eliminate the requirement for a surety bond in that this is no longer required by statute, 2) update references to state statutes and, 3) provide that wine licenses should run from April 1 through April 1, rather than July 1 through July 1. This change would allow non - intoxicating malt liquor licenses and wine licenses to have the same license term thereby reducing insurance costs for the licensee. Ordinance No. 902 -A8 also provides that establishments holding both a non - intoxicating malt liquor license and a wine license, must serve 3.2 beer in the same manner as it serves wine, namely that it must serve beer only in conjunction with the ordering of a meal. Ordinance No. 902 -A9 provides a corrected heading for Ordinance No. 902. Staff recommends that Ordinances Nos. 902 -A8 and 902 - A9, be approved even if the Council elects not to adopt Ordinance No. 902 -A10. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALE OF INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR AT ON -SALE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended by adding the following definition in its alphabetical order: "Intoxicating malt liquor" means any beer, ale or other beverage made from malt by fermentation and containing more than 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight." Sec. 2. Part I is hereby added to Ordinance No. 902 as follows: "PART I On Sale of Intoxicating Malt . Liquor In Restaurants Sec. 45. Requirements for On -Sale of Intoxicating Malt Liquor. (a) No person, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, shall sell at on -sale any intoxicating malt liquor, unless: (1) such person, and the premises where such on -sale is to be made, then has a license validly issued by the City, and then in force and effect; (i) for the on -sale of wine in a qualifying restaurant pursuant to Part H of this ordinance; (ii) for the on =sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor pursuant to Part C of this ordinance; (iii) for a food establishment pursuant to Ordinance No. 731 of the City, or any successor ordinance, and as such ordinance or successor ordinance may now or hereafter be amended or modified; (2) at least 60% of the gross receipts of the restaurant described in said food establishment license and said on -sale 03/12/91 10:00 DORSEY WHITNEY - -- CITY OF ED I NA W 002 wine license are attributable to the sale of food at said restaurant; and (3) such person has demonstrated to the City Clerk proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by State Statutes, Section 340A.801, in the manner and to the extent required by State Statutes, Section 340A.409. Sec. 46. Sale of ood. (a) The requirement at Sec. 45(a)(2) of this Part I, that at least 60% of the gross receipts of the restaurant be attributable to the sale of food, shall be established by an affidavit of the licensee, such affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to the City Clerk. Such affidavit shall be given with each application for issuance or renewal of an on -sale wine license. In addition, the licensee shall give such an affidavit at such other times as the City Clerk may request. Also, the City Clerk, at any time and from time to time, may require that any such affidavit be verified and confirmed, in a form and manner designated by the City Clerk, by a Certified Public Accountant who is a member of the Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants. (b) Failure or refusal of a licensee to give such .affidavit with such application, or on, request of the City Clerk, or any false statement in any such affidavit, shall be grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of all licenses held by such licensee for the on -sale of non — intoxicating malt liquor or the on -sale of wine. Sec. 47. Conditions of Sale. (a) The provisions of Sec. 40 of Part H of this ordinance relating to the on -sale of wine (including specifically, without limitation, the requirements that a meal must be ordered to be consumed with the intoxicating malt liquor, and that no sales or consumption of intoxicating malt liquor be permitted at a bar) shall also apply to the on -sale of intoxicating malt liquor under this Part I. Sec. 48. Enfor ement. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all Icenses issued under this Part I, except to the extent inconsistent with applicable State statutes and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the State statutes and regulations shall apply. 2 03/12/91 10:00 DORSEY WHITNEY ••• CITY OF EDINA 16 003 Sec. 49. Automatic Termination. The provisions of this Part 1 shall terminate automatically at 12:01 A.M. on April 1, 1996. No intoxicating malt liquors shall be sold-under this Part I after said time and date. ". Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage' and publication. First Reading: Second Reading•. Published in the Edina Sun - Current: Attest: Clerk 3 Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 902 TO ELIMINATE REQUIREMENT FOR SURETY BOND, TO REQUIRE SALE OF FOOD WITH SALE OF NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, TO UPDATE REFERENCES TO STATE STATUTES AND TO PROVIDE FOR LICENSING TERM FROM APRIL 1 TO APRIL 1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 9 and Sec. 37 of Ordinance No. 902 are hereby amended to change the reference in said sections to State Statutes, Section 340.95 and Section 340.11, subdivision 211 to State Statutes, Section 340A.801 and Section 340A.409, respectively. Sec. 2. Sec. 11 of Ordinance 902 is,hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 3. Sec. 13 of Ordinance 902 is hereby amended by adding a new, paragraph (f) as follows: "(f) Every license issued under this Part C shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on the April 1 following its date of issuance. Sec. 4. Sec. 18 of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (c) as follows: "(c) In any place licensed for the on -sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor, which is also licensed for the on -sale of wine under Part H of this ordinance, no person shall be sold, served or consume non - intoxicating malt liquor who does not order a meal to be served with the non - intoxicating malt liquor." Sec. 5. Sec. 36(e) of Ordinance 902 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Every license hereafter issued under this Part H shall expire. at 12:01 A.M. on the April 1 following its date of issuance, but licenses previously issued under this Part H and now in effect shall expire at 12:01 A.M., on July 1, 1991." Sec. 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: .Published in the Edina Sun - Current: Mayor Attest: Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 AS PRESENTLY AMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. -The heading and style of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended by adding immediately below the heading, the phrase "THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: ". Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect as of, and shall be effective retroactively to, the earliest effective date of said Ordinance No. 902. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current: Attest: Clerk a Mayor Agenda Item IV.A l CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: March 14, 1991 TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Amendments to Wine Licensing At the March 4, 1991, . Council meeting, I was directed to comment on the impact of adding strong beer - service to the existing wine licensing provisions. I made a brief review of police responses to licensed establishments and queried the police staff regarding any - problems with the licensed locations. Additionally, I reviewed our most recent inspections and spoke with the investigator who is now in the process of another round of inspections. All the information I have access to indicated that the addition of strong beer will not create new complications or problems. The up -scale format of the majority of the license holders makes this a safe prediction. However, a more convenience -food and casually- oriented type of restaurant may bear watching. If you have questions or comments, please contact me. w CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF F POLICE EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT CGS:nah A. 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE F�v Jy: TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 18 March, 1991 . AGENDA ITEM VI, A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two Standby Generators Company y, Flaherty Equipment Corporation* 2, Interstate Detroit Diesel, Inc. 3. Katolight, Corp. 4. 5. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 30,940.00 2, $ 35,970.00 3, $ 41,689.00 4. 5 .. *Did not meet specifications. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Interstate Detroit Diesel, Inc. $ 35,970.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is for two standby generators. One will replace the generator located at City Hall and the other is for the sewage lift station at 72nd Street. The funds for these generators are from the capital plan. - � G � Si atur The Recommended bid is _ within budget not Public Works - Engineering Department , allin, Finance Director tosland ity Manager * REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Chuck Peterson, Liquor Stores VIA:' Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 03/14/91 AGENDA ITEM vi . B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Signs for Yorkdale Liquor Store Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1, Sign Services Incorporated 1, $13,999.00 2. Lawrence Sign 2. 14,980.00 3. Universal Signs 3. 16,549.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sign Services Incorporated GENERAL INFORMATION: This request was submitted for the prior Council meeting with the bid being awarded to Sign Services. Due to a miscalculation on our part, the lowest bid is $13999 not $10848 as previously listed. Sign Services Inc. is still the lowest bid. The previous request is attached to the back of this document. Signature The Recommended bid is 1L— within budget not within Liquor Stores � Wallin, Finance nance Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Chuck Peterson, Liquor Stores VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE., 3/01/91 AGENDA ITEM V • B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Sign Services Incorporated 1•$10,848.50 2. Lawrence Sign 2. 14,980.00 3. Universal Signs 3. 16,549.00 4. 4. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sign Services Incorporated GENERAL INFORMATION: The preceding quotes are for an illuminated awning for the Yorkdale Liquor Store. The awning will be internally lit and reflect our . new color scheme and liquor store logo. The awning will provide better lighting in front of the store for our customers and make the store more visible from York Avenue. Signature The Recommended bid is x — within budget not Liquor Stores N-U- G.Jn.e- lin, Finance Director Manager � SIGN SERVICES *44J� NCORPORATED 1016 North 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55411 612-340-9380 *Fax 340-9747 February 5, 1991 Mr. Ken Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina; MN 55424 Dear Ken: Pleased to present the General Terms and specifics for an illuminated sign awning and pylon remodel for Edina Liquor Stores per our sketches 90 -5 -145 and 91 -5 =3. 905145 awning fabricated with an aluminum tube frame covered with vinyl coated nylon material illuminated with two (2) rows of fluorescent lamps and EGG crate bottom. 136.00 per lineal ft. installed Entrance unit 3' -1" X 10 wide with 7' -11" projection. Fabrications described above with additional two (2) rows of fluorescent lamps for open hour attraction. Price: $4,615.00 installed 91 -5 -3 awning as described on 90 -S -145. Two (2) units over windows 4' X 7' with 5' -6':. projection. Price: $4;615.00 installed One (1) unit over entrance 4' X 15' with 7' -6" projection. Price: $5,775.00 installed Remodel pylon sign 16' X 5'. Add illuminated 4'..diameter logo with fabricated illuminated letters to exisiting wood cabinet. Price: $8,550.00 Fabricate new aluminum cabinet with routed copy installed on existing supports and illuminated with fluorescent lamps. Price: $6,150.00 Design 9 Engineering • Manufacturing • Installation • Service Page 2 Ken Rosland Electrical service and connection by others. Awning frame, fabricate and EGG crating covered with a five (5) year warranty. Flur.orescent lamps and ballasts have a one (1) year warranty. Thank you for the opportunity to make this proposal. Trust we can be authorized to serve you further. If you have any uestions, please contact me at (612) 340 -9380. Sincerely, C. Chine' Sid Consultant CLApv a February 18, 1991 Mr. Ken Rosland, Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50th'Street Edina,'MN 55424 ' Dear Mr. Rosland: Lawrence .Sign We are pleased to offer the following prices and general specifications to furnish and install illuminated awnings and pylon sign for Edina Liquor Store #1. To furnish and install one 79'6" illuminated awning consisting of a 69'6" section measuring 3'6" high and one section over the entrance measuring 3'1" high x 7'6" deep x 10' in length. These awnings will-have an aluminum frame construction covered with a vinyl coated nylon fabric. The 69' awning will be lighted by two rows of high output fluorescent lamps and the 10' section will have 4 rows of fluorescent lamps. Both awnings will have a plastic louvered soffit. Price - $14,980.00 To furnish and install one 16' high x 5 double faced illuminated pylon sign. This sign will have aluminum construction with routed copy and illuminated by horizontal fluorescent lamps. This sign would be installed on existing structure. Price $ 6,760.00 945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE AST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 A 612-488-6711 a FAX 612.488.6715 City of Edina February 18, 1991 Page 2 M We also wish to offer the following price to furnish and install three illuminated awnings for Edina Liquor Store #2. These awnings consist of two 4' high x 7' long x 5'6" deep units for windows and one 4' high x 15' long with a 7'6" projection for entrance. These awnings would -also have aluminum frame construction and be covered with coated vinyl. Price $11,115.00 The prices quoted did not include permits if required or the cost of primary electrical service and connection. If you have questions and need more detailed specifications, please call. Sincerely, LAWRENCE SIGN Roger Schwartzbauer RS /sw Anchor Signs Inc. St. Paul, MN 55104 (612) 645.0223 _ A complete sign manufacturer and maintenance company FAX 645-2531 PROPOSAL Submitted To: i t" J 6 i r a _cana, ::if 5542' _ =' :: r:ric .nderson Ld.ina Li --uor 41: Date: ehruary 2�, 19 >1 Location: -dint Liaubr 1 ^Tina Liouor 2 Lrnish "nd ins.tall one (1) iilaminn6ed a *.anina :-proximately 11-611 x 791-6" x 2' ?•.ith a 101 :. 71-611 x ?' -611 entrance detail. Design per sign services, - rar:ina .;4 90-7-145 .rice: 16,5L9.uu Edina -.;c:uor . urni ^h and install three two (2) approximately appro :Umately 4' x 1j1 Design per sign cervices _rice: = 10,9'124 .00 (?) illuminate 71 Y CI_ 1 Cne (1) 7 1 —611 All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed In accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed In a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of ?ee ai;ove Dollars(S 1. plus Sales Tax and Permits with payments to be made as follows: ❑ 1/2 Down — balance on completion _ e t ? 0 d y s Any alternation or deviation from above specifications shall be an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary Insurance .upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public, Liability Insurance on above work until completed by Anchor Signs, Inc. DB /A Universal Signs. „ "J Note — This proposal may be withdrawn by us If not accepted within 30 days — Universal Signs ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. In addition, In the event of default on payment when due, the undersigned further agrees to pay all costs and reasonable attorney fees Incurred In the collection of the debt. Signature Date Accepted (PLEASE PRINT) g O, )I O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Subject: INFORMAL PRESENTATION - LUND'S EXPANSION - TRES LUND Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VII.A. Consent ❑ Information Only 0 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion During the Council's consideration of the 50th & France Streetscape and Parking Projects, several references were made concerning improvements to properties owned by Lund's. In response to our request, Lund's has agreed to appear at the March 18, 1991, Council meeting for the purpose of briefing the Council on upcoming projects. Some Council Members have inquired as to the City's authority to review and approve remodeling or renovation plans such as that proposed by Lund's. According to the zoning ordinance, such projects do not require City approval unless the building is non- conforming from a zoning standpoint or if the floor area of the building will be increased by more than loo by virtue of the renovation (a building permit of course is required for the actual construction process). Based upon staff's understanding of the work to be pursued by Lund's in 1991, no Planning Commission or Council review is required. A future project Report and Recommendation / Lund's Renovation March 18, 1991 Page Two involving the vacant space west of the Edina Theater and north of the 51st Street parking ramp would require Planning Commission review and Council approval, in that it will result in an increase in the floor area of the buildings. We will answer any questions that the Council may have following Lund's presentation on March 18th. MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MARCH 11, 1991 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Bob Sherman Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT None OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Cap Ms. SECTION A Susan Smith, 6813 Chapel Lane Helen Ryan, 6025 Chapel Drive George Burke, 6820 Chapel Lane Bill Phillips, 4075 West 51st Street Howard Merriman, 4075 West 51st Street Tom Geske, Edina School District Transportation Robert Bach, 6816 Chapel Lane tain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department VII. (B) Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as• requested or modified and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Request to restrict parking during school days on Chapel Drive and Chapel Lane. Petition received from numerous local residents.. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman stated that a petition had been received from numerous resi- dents regarding the parking problems on Chapel Lane and Chapel Drive. He reviewed that other requests have come in to the Committee in years past from other area residents, and in each case parking on these streets has been restricted, which has pushed the parking out farther from the school grounds.. The consensus from the petition was to further restrict parking for the school students in this area, with one resident suggesting that the entire subdivision be signed to restrict school parking. Ms. Helen Ryan., a resident of the area, summarized the concerns of the petitioners. She stated that vehicles parked from outside the neighborhood are constantly parked in front of homes and driveways, snow removal is impaired, litter and noise are a nuisance for the residents, and there is a danger to the small children who catch school buses.in the area. She further stated that on the days when their streets are the fullest, she has driven past the high school lot and found it nearly empty. Also, she TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES March 11, 1991 Page 2 questioned a fee of $20 which she was told students were being.charged to park in the school lot. Her assumption was that the lot was already paid for by taxpayer dollars. Ms. Ryan further stated that prohibiting parking, while it may dissuade the school traffic, also penalizes the residents who may have a need for on- street parking during the day. She felt that the school district showed lack of.interest in the residents' plight. She also brought_ to the meeting a "10th" warning notice given to a student for parking in the school lot which was found in her yard. It is her con- cern that a mixed message is being sent regarding enforcement of the school policies. Mr. Hoffman stated that the last involvement was that the City Council work with the School Board to try to resolve the issue. He felt that the entire school parking issue may need tb be revisited. Also, Mr. Swanson stated that it was his understanding that only senior students were allowed permit parking at the high school. If that, in fact, is the case he surmised that sophomore and juniors who were driving to school due to employment or for other reasons were probably parking on the outside resi- dential streets versus the school lot. Mr. Sherman asked if provisions could be made for residents only parking, and was advised that being it is a public roadway, any restrictions would have to apply to all. Mrs. Fuhr was interested in comments generated from local residents who all ready had.the restrictions in place and if any exceptions had been made. She was advised that most had adapted to the parking restrictions in their neighborhoods and, in a limited number of cases, exceptions had been made only until such time as other measures could be arranged for parking. Mr. Swanson moved to install the'customary school parking restriction signs in the area of Chapel Lane and Chapel Drive to the extent of those who had been notified of this. agenda item. Mr. Hughes asked,to amend the motion to include the City Council express their concerns to the School District. He also suggested to the residents present that they may wish to attend a School Board meeting to voice the opinions of the subdivision. Mr. Swanson moved to install "NO PARKING. 8 AM - 4 PM. SCHOOL DAYS" siens on Chapel Lane and Chapel Drive in the areas receiving notification, and to have the City Council express parking concerns to the School District. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (2) Review accident history on Benton Avenue from Crescent Drive to Tracy Avenue. Requested by Engineering and Police Department. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reviewed the measures taken in the past two years which included placement of wooden bollards around the curves of this section of roadway. Since this had been done, two accidents have resulted in major property damage to vehicles traveling at unsafe speeds for condi- tions. It was his opinion that the steps taken were all that could be taken unless the-area could be redesigned. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES March 11, 1991 Page 3 Captain Kleven stated that there had been no major injury accidents to date. However, with the close proximity of the elementary school it might only be a matter of time before we had a serious accident in this curved l area. Mr. Hoffman suggested that the remaining option for improvement might be to redesign-the-area around the pond to somewhat straighten the curvature. and remove some of the foliage. Mr. Hughes moved to refer the item to Engineering Department for a feasi- bility study to redesign. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (3) Review the area of Southview Lane and East Frontage Road since the upgrade to a.3-way "STOP ". Unscheduled agenda item brought by Fran Hoffman, Director Public Works/ Engineering. ACTION TAKEN: At the December 11, 1990 Traffic Safety Meeting, a motion had been made to install "STOP" signs for north and southbound traffic on the East Frontage Road.at Southview Lane. 'This has been completed. Due to the senior citizens program now being located at the Community Center, Mr. Hoffman was also asked, at that time, to suggest potential safety improvements to the north parking lot area of the Center. Mr. Hoffman brought plans before the Committee outlining the following: a. removal of the driveway on Southview Lane. b. adding a driveway to the East Frontage Road side of the lot. C. providing a marked walkway from the parking lot to the corner to cross Southview Lane from,the north lot. d. install a chain link or type of fencing to prevent "jay- walking" across Southview Lane. e. propose a "One -Way" driveway to enter the Center on the north side. f. providing a bay for kindergarten bus pull off. The plans were explained by Mr. Hoffman, who also stated that discussions had taken place to recommend the north lot be designated as the senior citizen parking area. Mr. Hughes moved to endorse the safety elan drawn up by the Engineering Department. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. (1) Request for pedestrian crosswalk at West 51st Street and Halifax Avenue. Request received from resident at Lanterns of Edina, 4075 West 51st Street. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES March 11, 1991 Page 4 ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by explaining that when the temporary barricade was tried on Halifax Avenue, a crosswalk was also discussed at that time as an option. However, the Committee has gone on record as not supporting mid -block marked crosswalks. The reasoning behind this is that crossing without the aid of traffic control devices leads pedestrians to a false sense of security assuming that traffic will always stop. He asked the representatives of the Lanterns to express their concerns. The residents stated that, at present, one of the biggest concerns was that if crossing West 51st to go to Lunds or the 50th and France commercial area, most residents would walk on the north side of the street to the driveway of Lunds or use the ramp entrance area. They felt that there was adequate pedestrian signing, but if it was possible to install a sidewalk on the west side of Lunds this would keep pedestrian traffic from walking on West 51st Street. Mr. Hoffman expressed the opinion that it seemed.to date there had been no problem with crossing because pedestrians use extreme caution. He reiterated that a false sense of security is assumed when pedestrians think they have a guaranteed right -of -way. Mrs. Fuhr disagreed stating that pedestrians in a crosswalk have rights also, and those persons are deserving of consideration as well as vehicular traffic. Mrs. Fuhr moved to investigate the feasibility of a sidewalk between the ramp driveway to extend to the west driveway of Lunds, and also to. study adding a pedestrian crosswalk from Halifax to the north side of West 51st Street, to be brought back to the Committee for review. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Before a vote could be taken, Mr. Swanson went on record to state that he is opposed to the installation of the sidewalk for the area in question. His reasoning is that this would encourage dangerous pedestrian movement, and he felt a crosswalk would also. He further commented that he would not support this motion at an uncontrolled location. Mr. Hoffman asked the residents present how frequently this problem had surfaced at the Lantern Board of Directors meetings, and was told that, to their knowledge, no one had ever expressed concern over this issue. He further asked that., if this were a concern of the residents, would it be brought before the Board. He was assured that it would be. The question'was called for. Motion denied 2 -3. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE .Tl o e� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION T0: Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler Date: March 18, 1991 Subject: Waste Oil Disposal Recommendation: No action need be taken by Council. Agenda Item # -v-u. c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion At this time the oil recycling questions seem to have been resolved for most Edina residents. Any future situations that appear to be in violation of Minnesota statutes can be referred to the State enforcement agency. Into/Background- At the March 4 meeting, a resident reported that an Edina service station had refused to accept used motor oil for recycling. The resident believed the service station operator to be in violation of Minnesota statutes thereby. He urged City Council to take action to enforce compliance, and /or pass an ordinance to require all service stations to accept motor oil for recycling. Council requested a staff report to clarify the Minnesota laws on this issue and suggest appropriate enforcement action. -over- MINNESOTA STATUTES REGARDING USED MOTOR OIL: M.S 115A.916, 325.E10, 325.E11 Effective January 1, 1988, disposal of used motor oil in mixed municipal waste (household trash) or solid waste disposal facility is prohibited. State law requires retail sellers of motor oil to either: - provide a collection tank on the premises for used oil deposit, or -post a notice of the nearest used oil collection site within 10 miles of the point of sale. Nothing in the law prohibits a retailer from charging for deposit of oil. The law regarding lead acid batteries differs: i.e. all retailers selling batteries must accept used batteries for recycling. This applies even if the consumer is not purchasing a new battery. M.S. 325E.115 6 325E.1151 ENFORCEMENT The Minnesota Department of Public Service, Division of Weights and Measures has the responsibility to enforce the statutes on used oil. They are required to inspect retailers selling motor oil at least once every two years and issue citations to those not in compliance with the requirements. If complaints are received from the public, an inspector will visit the premises and issue appropriate warnings or citations. SERVICE STATION REPORT The Recycling Coordinator visited the service station in question on March 7, and found it to be apparently in compliance with the law. The station has a sign posted, stating that used oil will be accepted for recycling, and a similar sign for batteries. Two employees stated that used -oil is always accepted at the station_. They recalled that a person had asked to dispose of 15 gallons of oil recently. The owner- tried ` "to - charge a small fee for disposal, whereupon the man left. The employees did not know the party's name, so it may or may not be the same incident reported to Council. LETTER TO SERVICE STATIONS (COPY ATTACHED) A letter has been sent to all Edina service stations, explaining the discontinuance of the oil tank at the Recycling Center. The letter expressed appreciation for their efforts to accommodate residents wishing to recycle used oil. The letter referred questions on the Minnesota law to the Minnesota Dept. of Weights and Measures. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Many residents called City Hall for information during the weeks following the removal of the oil tank at the Recycling Center. These callers were advised to contact service stations. Since there were no further complaints, we assumed that residents had found recycling locations. Mr. Basill's situation is the only one reported to us that was not resolved to the resident's satisfaction. Mr. Basill was informed by letter of the information contained in this report. RECOMMENDATION At this time, a city ordinance does not seem necessary. If, in the future, oil recycling opportunities become very limited in Edina, the city could reconsider imposing requirements on the service stations. Complaints or questions from the public will be handled with an explanation of the situation and the options available to residents. If a retailer of motor oil (or lead acid batteries) is apparently in violation of the law, the matter will be referred to the Minnesota Department of Weights and Measures for enforcement. W96INA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 TO: EDINA SERVICE STATIONS & REPAIR GARAGES FROM: JANET CHANDLER, RECYCLING COORDINATOR SUBJECT: WASTE OIL RECYCLING DISCONTINUED AT EDINA RECYCLING CENTER This letter is being sent to inform you that the waste oil container at the Edina Recycling Center has been removed. The container was located outdoors in an area-accessible day and night. Unfortunately, a few persons took advantage of the situation and used the container as a dump for paint and other unknown,materials when no one was about. In consideration of the liabilities and costs that might be incurred if the City had to dispose of hazardous material, the decision was made to discontinue this service. The effect is that more Edina residents will be.relying on stations such as yours to take their used oil for recycling. Perhaps you have already noticed an increase in this type of request from the public. We hope that it will not be a problem for you to accomodate these additional requests. If you have questions on the Minnesota Statutes regarding used oil (or battery) recycling as it affects service stations, you .may call this office or the State of Minnesota, Department of Weights and Measures, 341 - 7200. Used oil disposal is an important part of the recycling efforts of the Edina community.. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. JC /jc -over- LETTER WAS SENT TO: Small Repair Garages 1. Auto Max, 6701 York Av S 2. Jiffy Lube, 6701 York Av S 3. Jiffy Lube, 5000 Vernon Av S 4. Midas, 6636 York Av S 5. Rapid.Oil Change, 4530 France Av S 6. Tires Plus, 5400 France Av S Service Stations 1. Edina Auto Care, 4101 W 50th St 2. Edina Auto Service, 6016 Vernon Av.S 3. Edina,Car Care 1176," 5415 W 70th St 4. Edina Union 76, 5354 France Av S 5. Fina Auto Care, 4101 W 50th St 6. Grandview 1176," 5100 Vernon Av.S 7. Lang's Edina 1166" Service, 5101 Edina Industrial Blvd 8. People's Plus, 6016 Vernon Av S 9. Roster's, 4416 Valley View Road 10.. South-France Amoco, 3901 W 70th St 11. Southdale Center Sinclair, 3500 W 69th St 12. Southdale Sinclair, 6996 France Av S 13. SuperAmerica, 5205 Vernon Av S 14. Total Petroleum, 5205 Vernon Av S 15. Wally's Valley View Mobil, 4500 Valley View 16. Edina Quik Six Standard, 5209 Vernon Av S A. o e A_ tA ch REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council From: John Wallin, Finance Dir. Date: March 14, 1991 Subject: Change to Joint Powers Agreement - LOGIS Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.D Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt resolution amending the joint powers agreement for Local Government Information Systems ( LOGIS) to change notification of withdrawal rules. Info /Background The amendment to the joint powers agreement for LOGIS changes the notification date for withdrawal from the organization and /or a specific application (i.e. Financial; Police,etc.) from October 15 to June 15. Without such notice, the City would be obligated for the budgeted revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. This change in date would coincide with the LOGIS budget process and would allow the organ= ization to develop alternatives to their budget if withdrawals occur. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM ( LOGIS): APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City of Section 1. Background: Findings. (City) as follows: 1.01. The City is a regular member in good standing of Local Government Information Systems ( LOGIS). The City is a party to the joint and cooperative agreement (Agreement) under which LOGIS was formed and operates. The Agreement has been entered into by the City and the other members pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 (Act). 1.02. The Board of Directors of LOGIS have recommended that certain changes to the Agreement be made. Those changes are embodied in a proposed amendment to the Agreement (Amendment). A form of the proposed Amendment has been reviewed by this Council. The form of the proposed Amendment is on file with the City Clerk. 1.03. Under the Act the Amendment must be approved by all regular members of LOGIS to be effective. _1.04. It is found and de_ termined that it is necessary and desirable for the orderly and efficient operation of LOGIS and the City that =the Amendment be adopted: - -- = Sec. 2. Approvals: Authorization. 2.01. The form of the Amendment is approved. 2.02. The Mayor and the City are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Amendment on behalf of the City. The Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution and the executed Amendment to the Executive Director of LOGIS. Mayor Attest: Clerk __ _ AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT The parties to this Amendment No 1 (Amendment) are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This Amendment amends certain provisions of the Joint and Cooperative Agreement (Agreement), effective May 1, 1972 which created Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS) and under which LOGIS operates. The Agreement and the Amendment are made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. - Section 1. Article IX, Section 2 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: "Section 2. The annual budget of LOGIS must be adopted in the following manner: (a) annually prior to June 1 the Board will supply each member with a proposed preliminary budget; (b) annually prior to the annual meeting of the Board in July the Board will supply each member with a proposed budget adjusted for withdrawal notifications received pursuant to Article XII; (c) the annual budget must be adopted at the annual meeting.of the Board in July. Promptly after adoption of the budget, the Board must mail copies of the budget to the chief administrative officer of each member. Upon adoption of the budget each member is obligated to LOGLS for the budgeted revenues and cost sharing charges fixed by the Board for the ensuing fiscal year in accordance with this Article." Sec. 2. Article XII is amended by adding a new Section 2 to read as follows: 'Section 2. A member who has not given notice of withdrawal on or before June 15 of a given year is obligated for the budgeted revenues and the cost sharing charges fixed by the Board for the ensuing fiscal year in accordance with Article IX." Sec. 3. This Amendment is effective on the date that identical Amendments and resolutions authorizing their execution have been filed in the office of the Executive Director of LOGIS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned governmental unit has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officers as of , 1991. CITY OF By Its Mayor By Its Filed in the office of the Executive Director of LOGIS this day of 1991. 6 Executive Director REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL e� Agenda Item # o Cn 0 CEIL SMITH REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VII. E. From: CEIL SMITH Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MARCH 18, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council LOCAL 49 OPERATING ENGINEERS 1991 Action ® Motion LABOR AGREEMENT ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Motion to ratify the 1991 Labor Agreement with Local 49 of the Operating Engineers. Info /Background: This Labor Agreement has been negotiated to provide a 4% increase in wages and a $20.00 increase in the employer monthly contribution to the employee flex benefit program. These two items are within the 1991 budget. Pz�_.4:1Ar\ o - e From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ O Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA �N�bRPOMSOV� ieaa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # vII. F From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MARCH 14, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS FT To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council approval of issuance of 3.2 Beer Licenses as listed. Info /Background In accordance with Ordinance No. 902, beer licenses require approval by the City Council before they can be issued. The following applications for renewal have been approved by the Police and Health Departments and are submitted for Council approval. On -Sale 3.2 Beer License Renewals Braemar Golf Course Braemar Golf Dome Bravo! Italian Specialties Correlli's Pizza & Pasta Daytons Food Service Edina American Legion Post Empress Restaurant Good Earth Restaurant Off -Sale 3.2 Beer License Renewals Country Store Edina Superette Holiday Stations Inc Jerry's Foods (also off -sale) Original Pancake House Pantry Restaurant Q Cumbers Tour De France Szechuan Star Restaurant T J's Family Restaurant The Lotus III Kenny's Markets SuperAmerica Station 101%74 1NI J�'•`nr.nw•�' To: Ken Rosland From: Bob Ko j etin Date: Piarch 14, 1.991 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Subject: Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector Recommendation: Agenda Item # III.G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommend Eugene Davis as the Assistant Weed Inspector 1991. Info /Background: Eugene Davis has been the assistant weed inspector for nearly 25 years. During this time he has dealt with many difficult situations with patience and determination. His knowledge of City and Stat- regulations makes him quintessential for the job. His 1990 rate of pay was $5.25 per hour plus mileage. He worked 723 hours for a total of $3,795.75. AGENDA ITEMS: VII.H. and VII.I. 91CITY OF E DINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 TO: Edina City Council FROM: Frederick S. Richards - Mayor DATE: March 13, 1991 SUBJECT: Boards and Commissions Appointments Thanks to those Council members who have furnished me names for various appointments to our boards and commissions. Peggy certainly has certainly led the charge in coming up with an abundance of suggestions. We are almost there. The following vacancies however still remain: , 1. Community Health Service Advisory Committee - Staff is searching for names.. In addition we need Council suggestions, particularly people who qualify as providers. 2. Human Relations Commission - One more person needed. 3. The Edina Foundation -- with the recent resignation of Perry Anderson, we need one more City designee. On Monday, March 18, the names of Char Scanlan to the Art Center; Virginia Sweeny to the Recycling Commission; and Peter Spokes to The Edina Foundation will be recommended. Any suggestions for these remaining vacancies to be filled will be-most-welcome-. --Thank-you-.— -- cc: Ken Rosland..�- T n� l� Frederick S. Richards Mayor REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: t KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: MARCH 14, 1991 Subject: PETITION FOR CURB & GU AND BITUMINOUS OVERLAY Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ ❑ Action FI El ❑ I.A To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Refer the petition for Curb & Gutter and Bituminous Overlay for Wooddale Avenue, West Shore Drive and Andover Road to the Engineering.Department for processing. Info /Background The attached petition for curb and gutter and bituminous overlay dated March 5, 1991, was received from property owners on Wooddale Avenue, Dunham Drive, West Shore Drive, and Andover Road. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER © CURB ANQ GUTTER ONLY U) I �-ti 8► 0ot'A.) s 00,a-10-1 ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUT'T'ER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. y� a O c a, e.. � y ( between r% d �1' �` and 21 J dCQ E V`AM 2 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S I SIGNATURE 4 7 '— /)/;r OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS %v --Z- OWNER'S PHONE This petition was circulated by: �J yy + �p 4,x/4 1q *d D ✓c 2 �k`1 4' �- Z 9 Z 7 3 '-dOSQ L \CL NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEFrMBER,m PETITION FOR CURB AND GUTTER /` i3,1. iJJ ° i•i -,j ;1 Dated TO THE HONORABLE COUNCIL OF TFE CITY OF EDINA: The undersigned being owners of not lees than 51% in frontage of the real property abutting on the following streets in said City: �WS�1��Df2���v2 between bu W� kJC--and 0 between S \-\oce and between_ _ and between and between and do hereby petition that said portion of said streets be improved by CONSTRUCTION OF STANDARD CITY CURB AND GUTTER therein, and that the cost of raid improvement be assessed against abutting property, as authorised by Chapter ;9P, Laws of Minnesota 1953, as amended. SIGNATURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS � • P awv.. 4520 � u �o,i.� � r � � � 7/is /U&sr .lA..s•:e �: �wTv� •f ���% lTKCIo✓� ,Ecac{% uuca�r �:r Thii s petition was circulated DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY h�r ' .s�v.i 1 �JovTh,� Q.r.t6Taz¢s ti..o't 418��OD alt i ltrT�p ptOC.K �j ./.- Seu.u- e 6h.uty E?MTC A-(ADO; :, o.v iD' 3i oze- zu • z) - zz ;_c+ 7 l3 i.oc.0 L ti, 601 - d C sfu f, s Lett .B /��►? t •v 7L. 6�/d�.� F s7�ef Sout+� Gam- dog- �st4tr� ,),. V- 2- got r("' A 'Cl- -t�-4P 5;vfk GatedtA. L Ctaft IJ �pLA � noes �S�a tc SPONSORS OF PETITIONS PLEASE NOTE: THE COUNCIL HAS ASKED THAT PETITIONS BE SIGNED BY OWNERS OF 60% OF ABUTTING PROPERTIES WHEREVER POSSIBLE. R -74 i. PETITION FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB TO THE.HONORABLE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: The undersigned being owners, of not less than 51% in frontage of the real property abutting on the following streets in said City: do hereby petition that said portion of said streets be improved by CONSTRICTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AIM CURB therein, and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against abutting property, as authorized by Chapter 398, Laws of Minnesota, 1953, as amended. LEGAL DESCRIPTION SIGNATURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS OF PROPERTY , litf This petition was circulated by SPONSORS OF PETITIONS PLEASE NOT COUNCIB,fiAS A THAT PETITIONS BE SIGNED BY OWNERS OF 60,E OF ABUTTI PROPERTIES ENEVER POSSIBLE. L LM League of Minnesota Cities Agenda Item X.A REGISTER TODAY FOR THE LEAGUE OF NIINNESOTA CITIES 1991 LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE TIN IE IS RUNNING ' OUT! Now is the 'time to register for the League of Minnesota Cities 1991 Legislative Conference to be held on April 10 at the St. Paul Radisson Hotel. Other municipal organizations participating in this conference are the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, Minnesota Association of Small Cities, Municipal Legislative Commission, Range Association of Municipalities and Schools, and the Ramsey County League of Local Governments. City officials will be able to hear first -hand from legislators concerning legislation affecting cities in the areas of property taxes and municipal finance, wetland protection, tax classification rates, transportation funding, presidential primary and legislative redistricting. After the opening session, "The Amazing Disappearing Act: Local Government Aid" with Senator Doug Johnson and Representative Paul Ogren, city officials will be shuttled to the capitol rotunda for the LMC capitol rally. At the capitol rally, legislative leaders such as-Speaker Vanasek, Senator Roger Moe, Senator Duane Benson, and Representative Terry Dempsey will share their viewpoints .concerning city funding. An opportunity for questions from the audience will be provided and are encouraged. Delegates will then shuttle back to the Radisson for lunch. Governor Arne Carlson has been invited to speak and share his perspective on where cities stand with his-administration. After lunch, there will be concurrent sessions from 2:00 - 3:15 pm and from 3:30 - 5:00 pm. Please see the attached agenda and. registration form for further details. To complete the day's activities, from 5:15 - 7:30 pm there will be a reception for city officials and legislators. Although the League has already issued invitations to all legislators, we encourage you to .contact your legislators personally and invite them to meet you at the reception. So register today and be a part of.the League's 1991 Legislative 'Conference. P_.. ParUdpa ing orgatdiallons Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities Minnesota Association of Small Cities Municipal Legislative Commission Range Association of Municipalities and Schools Ramsey County League of Local Governments League of Minnesota Cities 1991 Legislative Conference Wednesday, April 10, 1991 Radisson Hotel. St. Paul Agenda 9:30 -10:30 a.m. Property Tax Issues, Radisson Hotel "The Amazing Disappearing Act: Local Government Aid to Cities" Rep. Paul Ogren Senator Doug Johnson 11:00 -Noon Capitol Rally, Capitol Roamda (LMC will provide shuttle buses) City officials will hear and respond to legislative view points concerning funding for cities Rep. Robert Vanasek Rep. Terry Dempsey Senator Roger Moe Senator Duane Benson 12:30 -1:45 p.m. Luncheon, Radisson Hotel (LMC will provide shuttle buses) Where do cities stand with the Carlson administration? Will Governor Carlson introduce an alternative to LGA? * Governor Arne Carlson 2:00 -3:15 p.m. Concurrent Sessions Protection of Wetlands --The League supports modifying and increasing existing governmental protection of wetlands resources - -does the Legislature agree? * Senator Chuck Davis Ron Nargang, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Transportation Issues in Minnesota -- Funding and Structure -- Federal and State * Commissioner John Riley, Department of Transportation • * Senator Keith Langseth * Rep. Henry Kalis 3:30 -5:00 p.m. Concurrent Sessions Classification Rates —What changes should the state make in property tax rates for low, middle, and high -value homes, rental housing, and commercial - industrial property? What do legislators predict will actually happen in light of the state's budget deficit? * Rep. Alan Welle * Senator David Frederickson * Senator Ember Reichgott Presidential Primary/Redistricting - -Who will pick up the tab for the price of the presidential primary? Will the Legislature have redistricting boundaries finished by 1992? Secretary of State Joan Anderson Growe * Rep. Linda Scheid 5:15 -7 :30 p.m. Reception for City Ofticials and I.egislators * Invited to speak LMC 1991 Legislative Conference Wednesday, April 10, 1991 Radisson SL Paul Hotel 11 East Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Registration City (Please print or type) Name Title Name Title Name Title Registration fee: $70.00 advance Advance Registration $80.00 on -site. Deadline- -April 3,1991 - Check enclosed in the amount of $ Fee includes conference registration, luncheon, and evening reception with legislators invited. , Mail to League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101 Radisson Hotel St. Paul DON'T 1 -0RGEr- Make check or money order payable to Radisson Hotel St. Paul Do not send currency. ORGANIZATION Iragtte of Mieneseta Cities FUNCTION 1991 laislative Conference DATES ApW 9-10,1991 ALL RMLWSrS FM TIM ABOVE GROUP MUST BE RBCMW BY Alldl 3- 1991 Mr taaarva aea®dYla� tQ PeYr ar Trp* N® Catspm, LOU First Adder City SLY Zip cad* Shsr6r{ ram WM Ne a(pa*ma CHECK IN TIME 3:00 pm. Month Day Ya*r Arrival Tiara M*ela I Day I You I CHECKOUT TIME 12:00 p.m Arrival Dal* D*Parmra Deal 1 ' Accommodations will not be confirmed without a check for the tat night's deposit or use you Amex or Diners Club credit card number to guarantee your reservation. You will be charged for the I st night if reservations are not canceled 48 hours prior to arrival. (radii cmd D Amts D Dbm Cub 13 Via OMmmuni Rapistimdm Masao altak am) PLEASE OIBM PREFERRED ACCOPAWMATWHS special Reduced Rates for Members Only 5" single $M Double (2 people) - +q: l 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE. 032C33 03/04/91 182,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 032C33 03/04/91 162,000:0000- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL A A * * * * 035M98 03/04/91 972.01 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 440 -44 035M98 03/04/91 2,043.80 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 520 -52 035M98 03/04/91 9,759.22 MINNEGASCO GAS '10 -4254- 540 -54 035M98 03/04/91 2,991.04 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254- 646 -64 035M98 03/04/91 437.60 MINNEGASCO GAS 23- 4254 - 612 -61 035M98 03/04/91 1 3.00 MINNEGASCO GAS 26- 4254 - 682 -68 035M98 03/04/91 1,497.85 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254- 662 -66 035M98 03/04/91 320.35 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 664 -66 035M98 03/04/91 12,999.78 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 667 -66 035M98 03/04/91 4,867.28 MINNEGASCO GAS 28- 4254 - 702 -70 035M98 03/04/91 8,031.89 MINNEGASCO GAS 30- 4254 - 782 -78 035M98 .03/04/91 : 443.85 MINNEGASCO GAS 40- 4254 - 801 -80 035M98 03/04/91 4,724.21 MINNEGASCO GAS 40- 4254- 803 -80 035M98 03/04/91 139.52 MINNEGASCO GAS 50- 4254 - 821 -82 035M98 03/04/91 339.94 MINNEGASCO GAS 50- 4254 - 841 -84 035M98 03/04/91 412.?4 MINNEGASCO GAS 50- 4254 - 861 -86 49,983.58 " 035N16 03/04/91 25.07 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 301 -30 035N16 03/04/91 20,944.01 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 321 -30 035N16 03/04/91 3,320.12 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 322 -30 035N16 03/04/91 3,409.48 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 330 -30 035N16 03/04/91 28.54 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 375 -30 035N16 03/04/91 1,492.23 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 440 =44 035N16 03/04/91 47.18 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 460 -46 035N16 03/04/91 1,477.85 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 520 -52 035N16 03/04/91 2,464.52 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 035N16 03/04/91 6,074.36 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 646 -64 035N16 03/04/91 712.24 NSP POWER /LIGHT 23- 4252 - 612 -61 035N16 03/04/91 68.22 NSP POWER /LIGHT 26- 4252 - 682 -68 035NIS 03/04/91 1,863.82 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 662 -66 035N16 03/04/91 185.33 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 664 -66 035N16 03/04/91 1,224.40 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252- 667 -66 035N16 03/04/91 8,312.50 NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252- 702 -70 035N16 03/04/91 563.90 NSP POWER /LIGHT 29- 4252- 722 -72 035N16, 03/04/91 5,927.71 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252- 782 -78 035NIS 03/04/91 7.08 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 782 -78 035N16 03/04/91 '2 ;190.75 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 035N16 03/04/91 15,544.00 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252- 803 -80 035N16 03/04/91 84.74 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252- 902 -90 03SN16 03/04/91 695.71 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252 - 902 -90 035N16 03/04/91 688.45 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50 -4252- 821 -82 035N16 03/04/91 782.83 NSP POWER /LIGHT - 50 -4252- 841 -84 035N16 03/04/91 431.98 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252- 861 -86 78,566.78 " 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 036EII 03/04/91. R R R R R R TELEPHONE 036F14 03/04/91 036F14 03/04/91 R R R R R R USWEST 036P32 03/04/91 R R R R R R USWEST 036P82 03/04/91 036P82 03/04/91 036QIB 03/04/91 036016 03/04/91. RRRRRR TELEPHONE 042A82 03/04/91 042A82 03/04/91 042A82 03/04/91 042A82 03/04/91 042A82 03/04/91 042A83 03/04/91 R R R R R t US WEST 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91. 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 042U27 03/04/91 ,. AMOUNT 61.82 61.82 " 16,577.83 751.45 17,329.28 " 27,615.50 27,615.50 123.95 36.68 160.63 " 58.36 52.42 110.78 " 5.52 4.75 51.15 1.17 63.33 " 97.90 97.30 " CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION EAGLE WINE MIX FIDELITY BANK FICA FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE P.E.R.A PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY .WINE AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T PERA mix MIX MIX MIX TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 83.24 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 3,572.20 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 451.15 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 16.24 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 170.03 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 24.58 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 465.78 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 52.71 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 248.08 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE . 39.60 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 50.51 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 84.78 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 542.89 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 16.06 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE I 02 -28 -91 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL " "" -CKS. 10- 4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL """ -CKS 10- 4145- 510 -51 MANUAL " "" -CKS 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL " "" -CKS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL RRR -CKS 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL - 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 10- 4258 - 510 -51 MANUAL " "" -CKS 10- 4256- 438 -42 MANUAL 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL.: 10 -4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 26- 4256- 682 -68 MANUAL 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256- 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4256- 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4256- 801 -80 MANUAL 40 -4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 1991 .CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. A MESSAGE 042U27 03/04/91 18.08 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 841 -84 MANUAL 042U27 03/04/91 187.68 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 6,021.39 " 043EII 03/06/91 1.29- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043EII 03/06/91 12.60- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84. MANUAL. 043EII 03/06/91 9.27- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86'. . MANUAL 043EII 03/06/91 128.95 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043E11 03/06/91 1,259.59 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043EII 03/06/91 927.19 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 043E11 03/04/91 94:50 EAGLE WINE BEER 50- 4830 - 822 -82 MANUAL 2,387.07 • AAA -CKS 043E26 03/06/91 8.14- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 3.26- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 4.78- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 20.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 12.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 3.09- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 407.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 163.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 1,000.39 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 239.29 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 154.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86" MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 623.74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 299.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 117.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 332.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 2,291.98 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 743.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL 043E26 03/06/91 44.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26- 03/06/91 477.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUA[ 043E26 03/06/91 1,073.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 882 -86 NUA 043E26 03/06/91 411.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043E26 03/04/91 88.75 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 043E26 03/04/91 402.65 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 043E26 03/04/91 23.20 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 8,843.74 • A A A A A A " "" -.CKS 043G82 03/08/91 18.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043G82 03/06/91 30.12- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 043G82 03/06/91 96.29- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043082 03/06/91 76.34- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043082 043G82 03/08/91 03/06/91 2.10- 1,505.97 GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043G82 03/06/91 4,814.27. GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 043G82 03/06/91 105.21 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043G82 03/06/91 3,817.03 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628.- 862 -86 MANUAL 043682 03/06/91 18.38- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 .PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONI ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 8 MESSAGE. 043G82 03/06/91 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10,000.56 " * **_CKS 043362 03/06/91 2.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 043362 03/06/91 18.11- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 3.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 8.55- JOHNSON WINE S0 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 74.75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 10.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 5.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 45.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 4.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862-86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 904.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 3,737.99 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL. .. 043J62 03/06/91 22.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL` 043J62 03/06/91 15.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 154.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 2,297.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 154.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 882 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91. 154.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -88 _MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 248.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 5.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 17.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 15.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 858.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 1,085.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 133.14 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 495.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 11.21 JOHNSON WINE j 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 565.04 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 043J62 03/06/91 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,087.46 " * * * * ** **A-CKS 043P20 03/06/91 72.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P20 03/06/91 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P20 03/06/91 464.35 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043P20 03/06/91 7.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043P20 03/08/91 509.15 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4028- 862 -86 MANUAL 043P20 03/06/91 8.80 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1,065.40 * * * * ** * * *. -CKS'" 043P82 03/06/91 2.78- PRIOR WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 .69- PRIOR WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 .55- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 2.64- PRIOR-WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 8.98- PRIOR WINE i 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 043P82 03/06/91 68.90 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 278.35 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043P82, 03/06/91 263.70 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043P82 03/06/91 55.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043P82 03/08/91 897.52 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043P82 03/04/91 50.49 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,598.72 A "AAA A 043Q16 03/06/91 58.35- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 043016 03/06/91- 14.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 1.02- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 39.01- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 .94- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 13.77- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 1.42- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710= 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 51.21 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 2,817.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 1,950.51 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/04/91 25.72 QUALITY WINE LIQUOR 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043016 03/06/91 71.20 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 1,483.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 043016 03/06/91 93.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -96 MANUAL 043Q16 03/06/91 1,372.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 7,738.82 " - * "" -CKS 046C39 03/04/91 169,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 046C33 03/04/91 169,000.0000 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL A A A A R A • * *" -CKS 050051 03/04/91 126.21 COMM /REV SALES TAX 10 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 179.12 COMM /REV SALES TAX 23- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 3,354.82 COMM /REV SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03%04/91 820.03 COMM /REV SALES TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 88.81 COMM /REV SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 1,136.30 COMM /REV SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 581.72 COMM /REV SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 5,526.24 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 10,133.34 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 050051 03/04/91 9;577.97 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL 31,524.56 " A A R A A A * "" -CKS 050F14 03/04/91 18,284.47 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 05OF14 03/04/91 750.72 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 17,035.19 " AAAAAA 051P32 03/04/91 27,671.79 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 27,671.79 " 052724 03/04/91 82.50 KIRK PETERSON REIMBURSEMENT 82.50 " 052E11 03/06/91 1.88- EAGLE WINE 052EII 03/06/91 6.94- EAGLE WINE 052EII 03/06/91 10.60 - EAGLE WINE 052EII 03/06/91 187.95 EAGLE WINE 052EII 03/06/91 693.70 EAGLE WINE 052E11 03/06/91 '1,059.89 EAGLE WINE 1,921.92 " 052E26 03/06/91 2.42- ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 3.16- ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 22.56- ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 17.41- ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 121.05 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 .158.00 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 1,128:20 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 870.86 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 527.00 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 246.00 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 461.50 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 738.45 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 700.95 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 333.90 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 767.35 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 570.50 ED PHILLIPS 052E26 03/06/91 1,108.20 ED PHILLIPS 7,687.41 052G82 03/06/91 23.04- GRIGGS COOPER 052682 03/06/91 80.47- GRIGGS COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 64'.70- GRIGGS COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 1,152.20 GRIGGS.COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 4,023.31 GRIGGS COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 3,234.83 GRIGGS COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 6.21- GRIGGS COOPER ' 052G82 03/06/91 9.24- GRIGGS COOPER 052G82 03/06/91 15.45- GRIGGS COOPER 8,211.23 052H83 03/04/91 200,000.00 HRA HRA ADVANCE 200,000.00 " * * R * R R 1 i i 02 -28 -91 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504- 782 -78 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 =82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86- 50 -4628- 862 -86 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50 -4628- 822 -82 50 =4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 10- 1145 - 000 -00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 02 -28 -91 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 052362 03/06/91 1.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 35.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 37.10- 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 3.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 75.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 17.63- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 8.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 11.54- JOHNSON'WINE 052P82 50 -3710- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 78.66- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 11.47- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 1,783.84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822-82 052J62 03/06/91 10.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 .23.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 3,758.46 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 3,932.56 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 22.42 JOHNSON WINE_ 50- 4626- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 339.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-822-82 052J62 03/06/91 192.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 3.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 052J62 03/06/91 25.37 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 859.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 1,763.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 052J62 03/06/91 1,156.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 27.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 17.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 052J62 03/06/91 1,146.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 14,841.21 " 052P70 03/04/91 200.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 200.00 " 052P82 03/06/91 .77- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 052P82 03/06/91 3.63- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 052P82 03/06/91 5.95- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 052P82 03/06/91 8.71- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 052P82- 03/06/91 336.90 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052P82 03/04/91 28.4p PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052P82 03/08/91 77.45 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 052P82 03/06/91 05.35 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 052P82 03/06/91 870.90 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 882 -88 052P82 03/04/91 48.56 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 1,936.50 " 052Q16 03/06/91 33.71- QUALITY WINE - 50- 3710- 822 -82 052Q16 03/06/91 `5.96- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 052Q16 03/06/91 33.71 QUALITY.WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER i i 02 -28 -91 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 052Q16 03/06/91 1.03- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 052016 052Q16 .03/06/91 03/06/91 28.59- 33.71- QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 052Q16 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 64.54 - 4.00- QUALITY WINE - QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 052016 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 63.18- 11.76- QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 052Q16 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 1,329.33 1,885.37 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 052QIB 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 1,685.67 1,685.37- QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 052Q16 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 3,226.52 3,157.44 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 052Q16 052Q16 03/06/91 03/06/91 592.90 101.45 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 052QIS 052016 03/06/91 03/06/91 397.95•-.. 1,170.81 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 11;451.32 " RRRRRR " "" -CKS 052T22 03/06/91 7.20 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 052T22 03/06/91 532.18 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 539.36 " " "" - C K S 052U27 052U27 03/04/91 03/04/91 18.08 344.39 USWEST COMM USWEST COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 436 -42 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL MANUAL 052U27 052U27 03/04/91 03/04/91 216.79 19.06 USWEST COMM USWEST COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622-62 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL MANUAL 052U27 03/04/91 29.10 52.26 USWEST COMM USWEST COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL MANUAL 052U27 052U27 03/04/91 03/04/81 168.42 USWEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 052U27 052U27 03/04/91 03/04/91 147.28 52.76 USWEST COMM USWEST COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 702 -70 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL MANUAL 052U27 03/04/91 1,180.41 63.88 USWEST COMM USWEST COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL MANUAL 052U27 03/04/91 2,290.41 " RRRRRR - KS 052W89 052W89 03/06/91 03/08/91 88.00 80.74 .. WORLD CLASS WINES WORLD CLASS.WINES 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL . 052W89 03/06/91 2.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 170.74," RRRRRR RRR -CKS 057866 03/06/81 03/06/91 3.25- 217.00 BRW ENTO PRISE BRW ENTERPRISE 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84. MANUAL MANUAL 057B66 213.75 " **A-CKS RRRxA R. 057EII 03/06/91 3.53- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02- 28 -91• PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.. 8 P.O. A MESSAGE 057E11 03/06/91 8.67- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 057E11 03/06/91 10.32- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057EII 03/06/91 353.30 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057E11 03/06/91 866.60 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057EII 03/06/91 1,032.22 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057EII 03/04/91 37.84 EAGLE WINE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 2,287.44 " . "" -CKS 057E26 03/06/91 13.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 24.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 22.39 -. ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 874.12 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 1,228.22 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 1,119.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 490.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL... 057E26 03/06/91 312.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4828 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 389.55 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 89.70- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 498.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 1,282.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/08/91 448.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 84.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 718.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 1,141.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057E26 03/06/91 ,,. 42 .25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 8,644.64 " .. " ".. " "" -CKS 057G82 03/06/91 64.48- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057082 03/06/91 41.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 2.67- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 3 .99- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL. 057G82 03/06/91 1 -. .46- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL. 057G82 03/06/91 3,222.83 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 2,091.59 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 1,710.02 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 72.78 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL .057082 03/06/91_ 80.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057082 03/06/91 133.72 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 . MANUAL 057G82 03/06/91 150.09- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057082 03/04/91 21..02 GRIGGS COOPER MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 6;877:44 " "" -CKS 057J62 03/08/91 1.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/08/91 1.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUA 057382 03/06/91 22.73- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 8.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 9.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842-84 MANUAL 057J62 03106/91 9.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 64.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 8.42 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA I. CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 4 MESSAGE' 057J62 03/06/91 5.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 9.80 -. JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 64.58 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL:; 057J62 03/06/91 1.55- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 1,138.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 19.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 3,245.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626-842 -84 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 6.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057362 03/06/91 20.80 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 3,226.41 JOHNSON.WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057362 03/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/08/91 - 173.92 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUA 057J62 03/06/91 821.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUA 057362 03/06/91 9.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 169.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057362 03/06/91 2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 1,000.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 911.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057362 03/06/91 11.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 057362 03/06/91 24.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 15.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 14.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 980.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 5.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057J62 03/06/91 567.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 12,151.07 " "�...« i " "" -CKS 057P20 03/06/91 109.60 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL': 057P20 03/06/91 66.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 .. MANUAL 057P20 03/06/91 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057P20 03/06/91 70.25 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057P20 03/06/91 70.25- PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL . 057P20 03/06/91 12.00 ' PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 057P20 03/06/91 540.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 730.60 " "... ". **A-CKS 057082 03/06/91 5.48- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057P82 03/06/91 .69- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 057P82 03/06/91 12.54- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 051P82 03/06/91 6.59- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 051P82 03/06/91 548.15 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057P82 03/04/91 26.14 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057P82 03/06/91 1,253.55 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057P82 057P82 03/06/91 03/06/91 68.90 659.20, PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 882 -88 MANUAL MANUAL 057P82 03/04/91 °99.64 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 2,630.28 " " "" CKS ' 057016 03/06/91 5.59- QUALITY WINE i 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 0 02 -28 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL CHECK REGISTER MANUAL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 057Q16 03/06/91 1.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 057Q16 03/06/91 .70- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 057Q16 03/06/91 29.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 057Q16 03/05/91 7.34 - QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 057Q16 03/06/91 1.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 057Q16 03/06/91 57.64 -. QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 057Q16 03/06/91 3.44- QUALITY WINE 10- 4201 - 440 -44 057Q16 03/06/91 67.15- QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 10:53- QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 1.48- QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 .47- QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 1,470.29 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 .73.96 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 34.80 QUALITY-WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 2,882.89 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 73.96 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 172.14 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 73.96 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 3,357.57 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 556.05 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 730.35 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 1,049.25 QUALITY WINE 057Q16 03/06/91 46.95 QUALITY'WINE 057Q16 03/04/91 30.44 QUALITY WINE MIX 10,365.90 " 057T22 03/06/91 54.80 THE WINE COMPANY 057T22 03/06/91 290.40 THE WINE COMPANY 345.20 " 058700 03/04/91 4,609.28 OHM CORP HAZMAT ASST 058700 03/04/91 4,609.23 OHM CORP HAZMAT ASST 058700 03/04/91 4,609.2$ - OHM CORP HAZMAT ASST 4,609.23 " R *RRRR 059G86 03/04/91 12,449.66 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 12,449..66 " RRRRRR 059M24 03/04/91 19,831.80 MEDCTR HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE - 19,831.60 " 059N12 03/04/91 2,336.57 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE 2,336.57 " R R R R R R 0 02 -28 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 - -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUA� 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL -CKS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - *RA -CKS 10- 4201- 440 -44 MANUAL 10- 4201 - 440 -44 MANUAL 10- 4201 - 440 -44 MANUAL *. ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL RR* -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL " "" -CKS 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL " "" -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -91 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. -R P.O. # MESSAGE 064E11 03/06/91 3.71- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064EII 03/06/91 .31- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064EII 03/06/91 2.00- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -.86 MANUAL 064EII 03/06/91 5.78- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 064E11 03/06/91 370.99 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 064EII 03/06/91 31.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E11 03/06/91 577.72 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 064EII 03/06/91 200.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,168.11 " ...... * *. -CKS 064E26 03/06/91 1.26- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 5.32- ED 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 32.39- .PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 18.81- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL., 064E26 03/06/91 1.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 852 -86 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 63.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 266.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 1,619.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 81.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 940.66 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL . 064E26 03/06/91 312.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 410.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 119.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 695.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 981.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -64 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 144.00 ED PHILLIPS ( 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 266.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 482.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 064E26 03/06/91 408.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,731.02 " ...�.. **A-CKS 064G82 03/06/91 29.59- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 47.41- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 4.12- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 77.47- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91. 1,479.53 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 130.49- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 206.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 -MANUAL 064G82 03/06/91 2,370.64 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 064682 03/06/91 3;873.26 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 7,640.35 " * * * *** i * ** -CKS 06.4J62 03/06/91 6.21- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 064J62 03/06/91 3.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064J62 03/06/91 44.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064J62 03/06/91 5.56 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064J62 03/06/91 6.91- -JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064J62 03/06/91 58.61- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064362 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 064J62 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 03/06/91 AMOUNT 77.29 - 6.52- 8.52- 2,211.12 10.62 2,929.71 23.31 24.78 3,863.46 2.83 8.85 10.03 620.12 329.90 694.70 558.40 17.70 8.85 4.60- 653.70 11.80 15:93 4.29- 852.87 12,615.00 " CHECK REGISTER VENDOR JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 064P82 03/06/91 .56- PRIOR WINE 064P82 03/06/91 2.16- PRIOR WINE 064P82 03/06/91 5.55- PRIOR WINE 064P82 03/06/91 6.65- PRIOR WINE 064P8.2 03/06/91 215.50 PRIOR WINE 064P82. 03/06/91 56.00 PRIOR WINE 064P82 03/06/91 555.05 PRIOR WINE 064P82 03/06/91 665.17 PRIOR WINE 1,476.80 " 064Q16 03/06/91 5.25- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 .72- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 32.61- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 77- QUALITY WINE 064Q18 03/06/91 70.80- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 10.36- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 49.87- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 .47- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 18.78- QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 38.14 QUALITY WINE 064QIS 03/06/91 1,630.59 QUALITY WINE 064QIS 03/06/91 3,541.98 QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 2,493.64 QUALITY WINE 064016 03/06/91 77.25 QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 523.05 QUALITY WINE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628-862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50.- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 02 -28 -91 PAGE 13 • P.O. 8 MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL " "" -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL "•" -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONI 064Q16 03/06/91 1,032.55 QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 1,671.66 QUALITY WINE 064Q16 03/06/91 46.9.5 QUALITY WINE 10,866.18 ** * * ** 389,106.25 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,503.74 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 95.80 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 22,185.52 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 14,395.17 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 692.31 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 18;.500.29 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 24,175.88 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND : 780.45 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 201,791.73 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 671,227.14 TOTAL 02 -28 -91 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * * * -CKS r 19-31 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 070P36 03/12/91 30.75 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 28- 4516- 701 -70 070P36 03/12/91 30.75- PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 28- 4516- 701 -70 .00 " ..R -CKS 077701 02/28/91 93.56 EXCELSIOR MFG SAFETY EQUIPMENT 40- 4642 - 805 -80 005608 3152 93.56 " 077702 02/28/91 14.89 CHESLEY TRUCK SALES PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 90086 14.89 " .. *... .. ■-CKS 077704 03/01/91 212.40 CONT CLAY CO COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -81 2356 3178 212.40 " 077705 03/01/91 73.00 JANE RENDER CANCEL CLASS 23- 3500 - 000 -00 73.00 " 077706 03/01/91 78.00 MARY KEARNEY CANCEL CLASS 23- 3500 - 000 -00 78.00 " 077707 03/01/91 48.00 ELIZABETH HERBES CANCEL CLASS 23- 3500- 000 -00 48.00 • 077708 03/01/91 780.00 APOLLA EQUP /LEASING GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 3222 780.00 " 077709 03/.01/91 85.64 INSIGHT NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4212- 510 -51 4308 85.64 r 077710 03/05/91 160.00- CONT LOOSE LEAF INC PRINTING 10- 4600- 803 -80 83510 077710 03/05/91 160.00 CONT LOOSE LEAF INC PRINTING 10- 4600- 803 -80 83510 077710 03/05/91 160.00 CONT LOOSE LEAF INC PRINTING 40- 4600- 803 -80 83510 160.00 ' 077711 03/05/91 35.00 TREASURY /STATE OF MN SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 480 -48 077711 03/05/91 35.00- TREASURY /STATE OF MN SCHI -OOL 10- 4202 - 480 -48 077711 03/05/91 35.00 TREASURY /STATE OF MN SCHI=OOL 10- 4202 - 480 -48 35.00 " 077712 03/05/91 35.00 METRO LEGAL SERV ABSTACT SEARCH 11- 4201- 127 -12 35.00 " 077713 03/05/91 60.00 NATL ENV.HEALTH ASSO DUES 10- 4204 - 480 -48 60.00 " 077714 03/05/91 58.77 ST PAUL RECORDER WANT ADS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 58.77 " 077715 03/05/91 30.00 UNIVERSITY OF CONT ED 50- 4206 - 860 -86 3257 30.00 " 077716 03/05/91 168.56- OLSEON GRAPHIC PROD CRESIT 23- 4504 - 612 -61 71922 2723 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. A MESSAGE 077716 03/05/91 180.00 OLSEON GRAPHIC PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 612 -61 147085 2723 077716 03/05/91 172.64 OLSEON GRAPHIC PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 612 -61 101412 2906 077716 03/05/91 159.00 OLSEON GRAPHIC PROD COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 1470.85 2723 343.08 * 077717 03/05/91 66.50 GADTKE PLUMBING REIMBURSEMENT 10- 3110 - 000 -00 66.50 * * * * -CKS 077719 03/06/91 37.00 GARDEN DESIGN SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 600 -60 37.00 " 077720 03/06/91 528.89 FRESCO TREE TRIMMING .TOOLS 10- 4580 - 644 -64 37259 3069 528.89 * 077721 03/06/91 867.30 SIGNS & BLANKS SIGN MATERIAL 10- 4542- 325 -30 613 2785 867.30 * 077722 03/06/91 19,827.76 ANDERSONS NEW CARPET CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 005 -00 2854 19,827.76 " 077723 03/06/91 90.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL SERV 3/8/91 10- 4201 - 600 -60 90.00 * 077724 03/06/91 56.10 FAST FRAME GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 56.10 077725 03/06/91 305.00 ALEJANDRO OR NORMA AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180- 000 -00 305.00 077726 03/06/91 35.00 TIMOTHY OR KAREN AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 35.00 " 077727 03/06/91 68.34 LAURA HINTON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 68.34 077728 03/06/91 129.27 TELEDYNE TOTAL POWER MUFFLER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 328355 3445 129.27 " 077729 03/06/91 9.49 GREAT NORTHERN EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 2592 9.49 " 077730 03/06/91 57.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 4136 3449 57.00 * 077731 03/06/91 4,033.00 EARL WEIKLE /SONS CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 015 -20 4,033.00 * 077732 03/08/91 50.00 BILL HOLLICK CONT ED 10- 4202 - 430 -42 50.00 * 077733 03/08/91 46.35 MICHAEL BLOOD CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 077733 03/08/91 54.99 MICHAEL BLOOD REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4266- 420 -42 101.34 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077734 03/08/91 15.00 A T 0 M, DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 15.00 " 077735 03/08/91 30.00 A T 0 M SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 420 -42 30.00 * 077736 03/08/91 155.00 MN INSTITUTE OF CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 11701 165.00 " 077737 03/08/91 51.95 CERAMIC ART /SUPP INC CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 16950 3414 077737 03/08/91 8.00 CERAMIC ART /SUPP INC COST /GOOD SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 16950 3414 59.95 * 077738 03/08/91 40.00 PEST -EX CONTROL PRO SERVICES 23- 4201 - 612 -61 2035 40.00 * 077739 03/08/91 51.88 G & J PATCH /PIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 - 51-1786 077739 03/08/91 51.88 G & J PATCH /PIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 1786 077739 03/08/91 51.88- G & J PATCH /PIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 510 -51 1786 077739 03/08/91 51.88 G & J PATCH /PIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 510 - -51 1786 077739 03/08/91 51.88- G & J PATCH /PIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 510 -51 1786 51.88 * 077740 03/08/91 600.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH LAB CERTIFICATES 10- 4201 - 482 -48 600.00 * 077741 03/08/91 730.00 POWER INVESTIGATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 50- 4201- 860 -86 824 730.00 077742 03/08/91 13:86- AEI PARTS GENERA SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 3405 077742 03/08/91 13.86 AEI PARTS GENERA SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 3405 077742 03/08/91 13.86 AEI PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 3405 13.86 077743 03/08/91 350.06 LIZ SUNNE SERVICES 30- 4201- 781 -78 350.00 " 077744 03/08/91 69.00 NORTH MEMORIAL EMS CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 69.00 " 077745 03/08/91 83.38 STAR BOWLING /GOLF TROPHIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 A11002 3279 83.38 " 077746 03/08/91 2 148.75 WAVE CAR WASHES CAR WASHES 10- 4296 - 560 -56 2990 2,148.75 * 077747 03/08/91 601.80 MN DEPT OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 10- 4612 - 560 -56 2068 601.80 * 077748 03/08/91 115.00 MN CHAPTER IAAI REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 115.00 * 077749 03/08/91 103.70 GRAB IT ENTERPRIZE TOOLS 10- 4580- 646 -64 00636 3488 103.70 * 3 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE ** * * ** 077751 03/11/91 077753 03/11/91 077754 03/11/91 077755 03/11/91 077756 03/11/91 077757 03/11/91 077758 03/11/91 077759 03/11/91 077760 03/12/91 077761 03/12/91 077782 03/12/91 077762 03/12/91 077763 03/12/91 077763 03/12/91 077763 03/12/91 077763 03/12/91 077764 03/12/91 077765 03/12/91 077766 03/12/91 077767 03/12/91 AMOUNT 25.00 25.00 " 62.00 62.00 * 22.50 22.50 * 59.00 59.00 * 31.50 31.50 * 22.50 22.50 " 25.00 25.00 * 250.00 250.00 * 229.00 229.00 * 49.02 49.02 " 1,500.00 2,000.00 3,500.00 7.90 71.82 71.82 71.82- 79.72 " 325.00 325.00 15.00 15.00 29.70 29.70 180.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION USTA LIGHTHOUSE LESLIE COX JULIE JONASSON SUSAN SHERWOOD DEBORAH ECHKO CITY & STATE CORY SMITH DON ENGER MICHAEL SNYDER EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN LINDA J MARGL LINDA J MARGL LINDA J MARGL LINDA J MARGL JILL A CAMERON LMCIT MIKE SIITARI M A W P MEMBERSHIP GENERAL SUPPLIES /AC REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND SUBSCRIPTION SCHOOL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE SERVICES SERVICES MAGAZINE MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE TRAINING WORKSHOP TRAINING TRAINING 03 -18 -91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 600 -60 23- 4504 - 613 -61 28- 3500 - 000 -00 28- 3500- 000 -00 28- 3500 - 000 -00 28- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4204 - 140 -14 27- 4202 - 661 -66 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4201 - 647 -64 25 -1139- 000 -00 10- 4204 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4201 - 600 -60 1045 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 077768 077.769 077770 077771 077772 077773 077774 077775 077776 077777 077778 077779 077779 1 077780 - 077781 077782 077783 077784 077785 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 03%12/91 03/12/91 03/12/91 AMOUNT 180.00 * 418.92 418.92 * 47:77 47.77 201:50 201.50 1,805.00 1,805..00 " 105.00 105.00 30.00 30.00 70.00 70.00 57.60 57.60 17,110.45 17,110.45 * 109.13 109.13 * 40.00 40.00 * 58.93 74.50 133.43 18,022.74 18,022.74 3,712.00 3,712.00 " 543.00 543.00 80.00 80.00 5.00 5.00 ,* 85.35 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TRIGG INDUSTIES SIMON & SCHUSTER MN COUNTY LAYNE MN CO DAKOTA CO BILLIE MOIR TC PHOTOCOPY INC ABBYLAND PROC INC LUNDA CONSTRUCTN CO LEROY LISK MN CHAPTER IAAI MOORE MED CORP MOORE MED CORP ELECTRIC SERV CO RCM ASSO INC MITY LITE INC STATE OF MN LINDA DALEN METRO SALES INC EQUIPMENT DUES PRINTING PAYMENT CONT ED TRAINING REPAIRS COST /GOODS PAYMENT BOOKS DUES AMBULANCE SUPPLIES AMBULANCE SUPPLIES PAYMENT PRO ENG SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES FERTIFICATE - REIMBURSEMENT PRINTING 03 -18 -91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4901 - 260 -26 04663 3483 10 -4204- 420 -42 10- 4600 - 420 -42 3627 60- 2040 - 000 -00 91 -2 10 -4202- 420 -42 10- 4202- 420 -42 28- 4248 - 702 -70 6641 3558 28- 4624 - 703 -70 69111 3472 60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -12 10- 4502 - 440 -44 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10 -4510- 440 -44 3533 10- 4510 - 440 -44 3534 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -10 25- 4900 - 004 -54 2934 10- 4504- 646 -64 7800 3647 10- 4260- 510 -51 10- 4156- 510 -5.1 27- 4600- 661 -66 291971 3425 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 85.35 * RRRRRR *R* -CKS 077787 03/12/91 125.00 NATL GOLF FOUNDATN DUES 27- 4204 - 661 -66 125.00 * 077788 03/12/91 315.00 METRO AREA PROM CO ADVERTISING 27- 4214 - 667 -66 896 3700 315.00 077789 03/12/91 48.10 ANDON GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 30682 3401 48.10 " 077790 03/12/91 300.00 TRAVEL GRAPHIC INTL PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 3479 300.00 " *RRRR* *** -CKS 077A01 02/28/91 119.00 3M CO SIGNS 10- 4542- 325 -30 61169 2664 077A01 02/28/91 134.00 3M CO SIGNS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 6437 1 3062 077A01 02/28/91 266.44 3M CO LETTERS 10- 4542- 325 -30 64374 3062 519.44 * *R * ** * ** -CKS 077A29 03/12/91 286.56 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570 - 260 -26 721981 077A29 03/12/91 236.88 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570 - 260 -26 722187 2459 523.44 * RwwR ** ** *-CKS 077A39 02/28/91 67.17 ALTERNATOR REBUILD DISPOSAL CAN 10- 4504 - 440 -44 7132 2888 077A39 03/06/91 62.80 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 13948 3307 129.97 " * *R * ** * ** -CKS 077A44 02/28/91 29.00 ARNOLD BING PLBG REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 10002 3361 29.00 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077A48 03/06/91 271.28 ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO CAMERA REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 271.28 " 077A49 03/05/91 198.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 077A49 03/05/91 11.70 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 482 -48 077A49 03/05/91 123.69 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 077A49 03/05/91 160.90 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 077A49 03/05/91 58.21 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 821 -82 077A49 03/05/91 55.87 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 841 -84 077A49 03/05/91 25.47 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86 640.69 " RRRRRR * ** -CKS . v 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT:. VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077A60 03/11/91 7.92 ANCHOR PAPER CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 7.92 * ** -CKS 077A74 02/28/91 139.92 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. BUSHING 10- 4540 - 560 -56 L38204 3156 077A74 03/06/91 259.76 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. BUSHING 10- 4540 - 550 -56 3156 077A74 02/28/91 498.10 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. PLATE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 L38221 3071 897.78 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077A76 03/12/91 378.90 ASPLUND COFFEE COST /GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 16332 3473 378.90 " * ** -CKS 077A80 03/06/91 393.10 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 3455 393.10 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077A85 Audio.Visual Wholesalers -8*4�fr4 03/12/91 43 -.37 AT-0 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 51462 O?YA84 03/12/91 113.49 -AltrT- GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 50994 077A85 15.6.86 " Audio Visual:Wholesalers.: * * * * ** " ** -CKS 077A95 03/01/91 55_.95 ADRIENE BRUMFIELD CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 6792 3411 55.95 " * * M * ** -CKS 077A99 03/12/91 20.70 AXT -LYLE CONCESSIONS 29- 4624- 722 -72 077A99 03/01/91 22.51 AXT -LYLE REIMBURSEMENT 29- 4624- 722 -72 43.21 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077613 03/12/91 300.00 BARR ENGINEERING SERVICES 10- 4201 - 260 -26 077613 03/12/91 3,000.00 BARR ENGINEERING SAFTWARE 10- 4901- 260 -26 077B13 03/06/91 1,111.10 BARR ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 003 -00 .4,411.10." 077814 03/06/91 168.90 BOYER TRUCK PARTS ARM 10- 4540- 560 -56 901523 3366 077614 03/06/91 44.83 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SWITCH 10- 4540- 560 -56 901782 3380 077814 03/06/91 133.05 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SHAFT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 900263 3288 346-78, "> * ** -CKS 077817 03/08/91 34,23.3.55 _ BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACT SERVICES 10- 4226 - 507 -50 34,233.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VE -NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077622 03/12/91 4.00 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630- 663 -66 077622 03/12/91 65.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 667 -66 077822 03/08/91 711.05 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 077B22 03/08/91 1,449.25 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50 -4630- 842 -84 077622 03/08/91 1,444.80 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 3,674.50 " R *RRRR * ** -CKS 077625 03/01/91 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " RRRRRR * ** -CKS 077627 03/12/91 113.93 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 077627 03/12/91 219.45 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 842 -84 077627 03/12/91 193.73 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 862 -86 527.11 * * * *RR * ** -CKS 077630 03/12/91 17.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 652818 077830 03/01/91 35.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 651114 077630 03/12/91 76.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 652941 077830 03/11/91 140.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGNS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 647416 3642 077630 03/12/91 144.84 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 553822 077630 03/01/91 19.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 600 -60 651359 077630 03/12/91 4.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 651284 2742 077830 03/12/91 20.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 440 -44 650847 2742 077630 03/12/91 4.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 510 -51 653076 077830 03/08/91 77.26 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 653316 077630 03/08/91 164.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 653312 077630 02/28/91 61.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 560 -56 648879 077830 03/12/91 603.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. FILE CABINET 10- 4902 - 260 -26 652978 3486 077630 03/01/91 25.04 BERTELSON BROS. INC, GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 651114 1,394.29 * R *RRRR *RR -CKS 077632 03/12/91 117.94 BEST LOCK OF MPLS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 667 -66 012879 2247 117.94 * *. *RRR *RA-CKS 077650 03/08/91 38.85 BEST BUY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 077850 03/08/91 334.00 BEST BUY CO EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 3323 370.85 " RRRR *R * ** -CKS 077659 03/06/91 5,947.66 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 077659 03/08/91 101.76 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 30- 4250- 782 -78 6,049.42 * : * *RRR * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 077B62 03/06/91 077662 03/06/91 077662 03/06/91 077862 03/06/91 * * * * ** SCHOOL 077673 03/12/91 077B73 03/12/91 077B73 03/12/91 077673 03/12/91 077873. 03/12/91 077673 03/12/91 077873 03/12/91 077B73 03/12/91 077673 03/12/91 077B73 03/12/91 077B73 03/12/91 077B74 03/11/91 * * ** ** COURSE 077678 03/06/91 077B81 02/28/91 077B81 02/28/91 077B81 02/28/91 077B82 03/08/91 * * * * ** 077C01 03/01/91 077C01 03/01/91 077C07 03/11/91 077C07 03/01/91 077C07 03/11/91 077C07 03/01/91 * * * * ** AMOUNT 309.40 254.19 320.20 222.07 1,105.86 50.00 125.97 85.00 15:85 67.50 70.00 35.39 20.74 120.48 49.67 42.75 683.35 490.00 490.00 368.92 368.92 1 , 858.17 858.17- 858.17 858.17 149.95 149.95 214.85 106.17, 321.02 1,358.64 1,491.70 1,320.91 1,602.62 5,773.87 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BOYUM EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS BOYUM EQUIPMENT BEARING BOYUM EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS BOYUM EQUIPMENT BEARING BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE RENTAL /PROPERTY BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SCHOOL BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE DUES BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE MILEAGE BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE ADVERTISING BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE TELETYPE SERVICE BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE POSTAGE BRAEMAR,GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BRAEMAR .GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CONCESSIONS BRADLEY BENN REPAIRS BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC BRW INC. BRW INC. BRW INC. BRUNSON INSTRUMENT C & S DISTRIBUTING C & S DISTRIBUTING CARGILL INC. CARGILL INC. CARGILL INC. CARGILL INC. CLEANING SUPPLIES ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING LEVEL 03 -18 -91 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6461 3450 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6488 3220 10- 4540- 560 -56 6462 3451 10-4540-560-56.6482 3221 27- 3230 - 000 -00 27- 4202 - 661 -66 27- 4204 - 661 -66 27- 4208 - 661 -66 27 -4214- 667 -66 27- 4268- 663 -66 27- 4290 - 661 -66 27- 4504 - 662 -66 27 -4504- 667 -66 27- 4516- 667 -66 27- 4624- 663 -66 10- 4248 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 520 -52 184555 3354 60 -1300- 290 -04 61307 60- 1300 - 290 -09 61307 60- 1300 - 290 - 09_61307 10- 4604 - 260 -26 083090 2458 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS .. * ** -CKS * ** -CKS COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 118887 3268 COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 118950 3268 * ** -CKS SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 694402 DE -ICING SALT 10 -4538- 318 -30 692697 8328 SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 694381 DE -ICING SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 692698 8328 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA 12.25 CHECK REGISTER 50- 4248 - 821 -82 03 -18 -91 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 6 MESSAGE 077C16 03/06/91 23.07 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 109531 3448 077C16 03/06/91 183.80 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 366063 3447 077C16 03/06/91 91.00- CATCO CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 302816 3212 115.87 " RRRRRR RRRRRR " ** -CKS 077C39 03/01/91 1,005.00 CLEAN -FLO LAB *** -CKS 077C32 03/06/91 107.25 FRAN CALLAHAN MILEAGE /FEB 10- 4208 - 480 -48 RRRRRR 107.25 * * ** -CKS RRRRRR ***-CKS 0 1 03/05/91 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 821 -82 077C36 03/05/91 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 841 -84 077C36 03/05/91 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 861 -86 36.75 * 077C37 03/05/91 55.53 CLANCY DRUG INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 55.53 * RRRRRR " ** -CKS 077C39 03/01/91 1,005.00 CLEAN -FLO LAB INDIANHEAD LAKE 10- 4201 - 358 -30 5568 3341 1,005.00 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS 077C44 03/12/91 842.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST /GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 3555 077C44 03/08/91 110.45 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 077C44 03/08/91 273.42 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 077C44 03/08/91 550.51 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 1,776.88 " RRRRRR RRR -CKS 077C51 03/12/91 147.91 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 220.90 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 23- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 82.19 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 4117.70 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 27- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 4,,177.70- COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 4,177.70 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 27- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 689.06 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 82.19 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 82.19- COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 505.75 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 30- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 1,087.27 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 40- 3357- 000 -00 077C51 03/12/91 6,228.08 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357- 001 -00 077C51 03/12/91 10,798.26 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 077C51 03/12/91 10,392.08 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 34,269.20 " RRRRRR *** -CKS 077C64 03/12/91 27.32 SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 662 -66 0 1 i '1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR. ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077C64 03/12/91 114.24 SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 663 -66 077C64 03/12/91 511.27 SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4624 - 663 -66 652.83 * * * * ** RR* -CKS 077C87 03/11/91 77.33- CURTIN MATHESON SCI CREDIT 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1412 077C87 Curtin Matheson Sci CTTe" 03/01/91 60.78 eHRiiS -fem LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 3322 C8 03/01/91 131.24 LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1412 077 77CCC888977 114.69* = - *. Curtin Matheson Sci 077 03/08/91 74.25 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 47414 3176 74.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077C92 02/28/91 237.29 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 3392 3297 •237.29 077C93 03/06/91 429.00 CERT HYD SPEC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 85046 3372 077C93 02/28/91 461.16 CERT HYD SPEC CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 84623 3296 077C93 02/28/91 61.33 CERT HYD SPEC PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 084677 3238 951.49 R * * R * ** -CKS 077D01 03/12/91 37.65 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 077D01 03/12/91 228.96 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 286:61 * * * *R ** * ** -CKS 077D07 03/01/91 .63.95 D.C. HEY CO. TONER 10- 4504 - 600 -60 216620 077D07 03/11/91 .63.95- D.C. HEY CO. SUPPLY /TONER 10- 4504 - 600 -60 216620 077D07 03/11/91 126.48- D.C. HEY CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS .23- 4248 - 612 -61 195928 077D07 03/01/91 126.48 D.C. HEY CO. REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 195928 077D07 03/01/91 180.54 D.C. HEY CO. REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 221776 077D07 03/11/91. 180.54- D.C. HEY CO. - CONTRACTED REPAIRS. 23- 4248-612 -61 221776 077007 03/01/91 381.13- D.C. HEY C0: CREDIT 23- 4248 - 612 -61. 211858 077D07 03/11/91 381.13 D.C. HEY CO. CREDIT - 23- 4248 - 612 -61 211858 .00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077D24 03/08/91 17.60 DIANE SANKEY MEETING EXP 10 -4202- 280 -28 077D24 03/08/91 4.00 DIANE SANKEY PARKING 10- 4504- 482 -48 077D24 03/08/91 :90:00 DIANE SANKEY REPAIRS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 111.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077D27 03/11/91 49.36 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 27- 4624- 663 -66 2693 49.36 1991 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 12 CHECK REGISTER MESSAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION R R R R R R * ** -CKS 10 -4100- 430 -42 077D39 03/08/91 63.59 DAYTONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 63.59 RRRRRR 27- 4624- 663 -66 2694 077D54 03/01/91 100.00 DAVID BLOOD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4145- 510 -51 43143 100.00 * RRRRRR 40- 4504 - 803 -80 15440 077D61 03/01/91 100.00 DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 104118 3452 100.00 * 10- 4504- 325 -30 104074 3147 R R R R R R 10- 4504 - 646 -64 104279 3453 077D86 03/11/91 36.84 DENNYS 5th AV BAKE BREAD /ROLLS 50- 4630- 842 -84 36.84 * 50- 4630- 862 -86 RRRRRR *"* -CKS 10- 4600- 500 -50 077D98 03/12/91 806.40 -DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 077D98 03/12/91 813.60 DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 1,620.00 * RRRRRR 077E02 02/28/91 530.58 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 530.58 * R R R,R R R 077E14 03/06/91 134.04 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN 077E14 03/06/91 132.70 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN 077E14 02/28/91 449.61 EARL F. ANDERSON STRIPING 077E14 03/06/91 40.86 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 757.21 R R R R R R 077E17 03/08/91 2,993.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 077E17 03/08/91 7,469.66 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 077E17 03/08/91 6,053.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 16,516.26 RRRRRR . 077E41 03/12/91 742.50 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 077E41 03/11/91 616.30 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SR REMODEL 1,358.80 RRRRRR 077 E63 03/08/91 3.49 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 03 -18 -91 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 6 P.O. 9 MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4516 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 10 -4100- 430 -42 **A-CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 27- 4624- 663 -66 2694 ""* -CKS 10- 4145- 510 -51 42954 10- 4145- 510 -51 43143 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 15440 * "* -CKS 10- 4504- 325 -30 104271 2880 10- 4504 - 325 -30 104118 3452 10- 4504- 325 -30 104074 3147 10- 4504 - 646 -64 104279 3453 CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 *"* -CKS 10- 4600- 500 -50 60- 1300 - 025 -20 **A-CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 250760 1991 CITY OF EDINA SERVICES LAUNDRY CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT LAUNDRY G & K 3.49 " R R R R R R K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 077E71 03/06/91 285.57 LAUNDRY 077E71 03/06/91 255.11 LAUNDRY 077E71. 02/28/91 76.04 LAUNDRY 616.72 RRRRRR 077F11 03/12/91 1,629.81 1,629.81 " RRRRRR 077F26 03/08/91 429.79 429.79 RxRxxx 077F56 03/12/91 3;626.00 077F56 03/12/91 3,626.00 077F56 03/12/91 3,626.00 10,878.00 " R R R R R R 077F70 03/11/91 135.00 135.00 " R R R R R R 077F73 03/01/91 76.30 76.30 " R R R R R R 077G01 03/05/91 620.08 077G01 03/05/91 232.00 077G01 03/05/91 245.55 077G01 03/05/91 196.35 077G01 03/05/91 135.55 077G01 03/05/91 19.60 077G01 03/05/91 473.05 1,922.18 " 077G02 03/08/91 1,080.00 1,080.00 " RRRRRR 077G09 03/08/91 309.00 077G09 03/0.8/91 229.00 077G09 03/08/91 509.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ELVIN SAFETY ELVIN SAFETY ELVIN SAFETY FEED RITE CONTROL GENERAL, SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS SUPPLIES WATER CHEMICALS FLEXIBLE PIPE'TOOL REPAIR PARTS 03 -18 -91 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #MESSAGE * * * —CKS 10- 4504- 335 -30 3055 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3056 10- 4642 - 301 -30 91042 3166 . 40- 4622 - 805 -80 153494 7342 40- 4540- 810 -80 4343 3213 FRANK B HALL & CO .INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 FRANK B HALL & CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 FRANK B HALL & CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 r FRIDEN ALCATEL UPDATE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 SUSAN FRAME COST /GOODS SOLD G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY LIZ GEREBI SERVICES GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED 23- 4624 - 613 -61 5239 3409 10- 4262- 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262- 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8654 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8645- 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8633 c 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,047.00 * * " 077G15 03112/91 28.00 GEM TAP SERV BEER LINES 28.00 * 077G16 03/06/91 314.03 GAS SUPPLY INC. TOOLS 314.03 * * * * * ** 077G24 03/08/91 100.00 PAT GREER EXHIBIT FEE 100.00 * * * * * ** 077(338 03/01/91 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * 077(364 03/08/91 975.00 GRUBERS POWER EQUIP MACH /EQUIP 975.00 * 077G68 02/28/91 281.30 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. WIRE 077G68 03/06/91 95.83 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. FIXTURE 077G68 03/06/91 41.76 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 418.89 * 077G72 03/11/91 50.00 GARY SMIEJA GENERAL SUUPLIES 50.00 * *;;G 096 03/06/91 471.00 GUY SPEAKER CO REPAIR PARTS 077G96 03/06/91 18.70 GUY SPEAKER CO CHARTS 489.70 ■ * " * "* 077H03 03/08/91 214.00 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 077H03 03/08/91 2,140.00 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 077H03 03/08/91 214.00- HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 2,140.00 * 077H04 02/28/91 175.90 HACH CO. SUPPLIES 175.96 * R * R * * k 077H09 03/06/91 623.00 HALLMAN 40 W OIL 03 -18 -91 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 4 MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27 -4630- 663 -66 2695 10- 4580 - 301 -30 20359 3047 * ** -CKS 30- 3501 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 30- 1340 - 000 -00 10581 3025 *** -CKS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 236196 3158 10- 4540- 520 -52 240558 3293 10- 4540 - 540 -54 243682 3434 * ** -CKS 40- 4504- 801 -80 CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2487 40- 4540- 801 -80 3315 * -CKS 40 -1220- 000 -00 3395 2439 40 -1220- 000 -00 3395 2439 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3395 2439 40- 4540 - 803 -80 439426 3209 * ** -CKS 10- 4618- 560 -56 106685 3067 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT... VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077H09 03/06/91 684.70 HALLMAN 15 -40 OIL 10- 4618 - 560 -56 107283 3359 077H09 03/05/91 124.80 HALLMAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 107257 3330 1,432.50 * * * * *" * ** -CKS 077H16 03/06/91 252.48 H &L MESABI PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 2577 252.48 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077H21 02/28/91 172.71 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 10- 4248 - 560 -56 010898 3155 172.71 *. 077H22 03/01/91 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100- 430 -42 100.00 " 077H23 03/12/91 88,930.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 88,930.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS - 077H34 03/08/91 2,620.00 HENN COUNTY TREAS. PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 1418 2,620.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077H36 03/12/91 1,120.05 HENN CTY MED CENTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 1153 2529 1,120.05 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077H65 03/01/91 100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -.42 100.00 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077H74 03/08/91 4.24 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 420 -42 4.24 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077I59 03/06/91 269.76 INTERIOR COM SYS INSTALL PHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 31468 077I59 03/12/91 253.00 .: INTERIOR COM >SYS TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 031506 3696 522.78 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077J27 03/01/91 34.06 JERRYS FOODS.. GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 6'11-61 34.66 * ** -CKS 077J31 03/11/91 22.55 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 ` 077331 03/'11/91 67.54 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 1991 CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 18.55 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 25.18 SUPPLIES - 077J31 03/11/91 a 25.35 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 8.18 . 077J31 03/11/91 44:16 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 88.17 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 5.64 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 .94 SUPPLIES 077J31 03/11/91 68.57 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 153.36 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 26.28 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 48.51 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 ?72.92 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 29:76 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 184.94 JERRYS 077J31 03/11/91 35.37 077331 03/11/91 11.99 077J31 03/11/91 75.39 1,013.35 k k R R R R 077J35 02/28/91 28.00 28.00 RRRRRR 077J50 02/28/91 403.74 077J50 02/28/91 167.85 571.59 RRRRRR 077J68 03/08/91 12.00 - 077J68 03/08/91 137.19 077368 03/08/91 9.50 077J68 03/08/91 70:25 077J68 03/08/91 77.64 077J68 03/08/91 135.04 077J68 03/08/91 30.93 . 077J68 03/08/91 6.07 478.62 ' R R R k R k 077J74 03/08/91. 17.99 17.99 " RRRRRR - 077J99 03/12/91 40.00 40.00 " - 077K05 03/11/91 - 165.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE FIRST AID SUPPLY JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS JERRYS HARDWARE::, GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS PRINTING PAPER JOHN H: FOSTER PARTS JOHN H. FOSTER. VALVE JOAN WATERSTREET PRO SERVICES JOAN WATERSTREET CONT ED JOAN WATERSTREET CONT ED JOAN WATERSTREET MEETING EXP JOAN WATERSTREET MILEAGE JOAN WATERSTREET GENERAL SUPPLIES JOAN WATERSTREET PHOTO SUPPLIES JOAN WATERSTREET AMMUNITION JUSTUS LUMBER JANET CANTON K & K SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE /LOGIS GENERAL SUPPLIES 03 -18 -91 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 322 -30, 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10 -4504- 390 -30 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 507 -50 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4504- 560 -56 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4510- 440 -44 10- 4580 - 301 -30 27- 4504 - 661 -66 27 -4504- 667 -66 27- 4544 - 662 -66 29- 4504 - 722 -72 30- 4504- 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4600- 140 -14 5878 10- 4248 - 560 -56 162066 2961 10- 4540 - 560 -56 162538 3214 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 430 -42 10- 4206 - 420 -42 ` 10- 4208 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4508- 420 -42 10- 4572 - 420 -42 30- 4504- 782 -78 78369 3423 10- 4208 - 160 -16 27- 4504 - 662 -66 58488 3559 * ** -CKS RRR -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS RRR -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** INDUST 077K09 03/06/91 077K09 03/08/91 077K09 03/12/91 077K09 03/05/91 077K09 03/05/91 * * * R * R 077K35 02/28/91 077K35 03/01/91 077K35 03/08/91 077K35 03/11/91 * * * * ** 077K45 03/05/91 ** *. ** 077K57 03/12/91 077K57 03/12/91 R * R * * * 077L01 03/08/91 077L02 03/12/91 077L02 03/12/91 077L02 03/12/91 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077L04 03/06/91 R * * *RR 41174 077L28 02/28/91 077L28 03/06/91 077L28 03/06/91 077L28 03/06/91 077L28. 03/06/91 077L28 02/28/91 077L28 03/06/91 077L28 02/28/91 AMOUNT 165.00 " 104.49 36.56 167.29 61.40 11.02 380.76 " 35.67 26.65 316.18 23.19 401.69 " 2,740.00 2,740.00 * 1,653.30 2,894.00 4,547.30 * 615.00 615.00 * 653.82 77.35 77.35- 653.82 * 89.48 89.48 * 85.45 116.04 207.99 486.25 372.59 282.41 112:86 94.58 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KOKESH ATHLETIC KUETHER DIST. CO. KUETHER DIST. CO. LINDA KOZAK 'LABOR RELATIONS ASN LABOR RELATIONS ASN LABOR RELATIONS ASN LAHASS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS 03 -18 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3274 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3327 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3328 10- 4540- 646 -64 3327 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3327 * ** -CKS MATERIAL 10- 4504 - 301 -30 792756 3167 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 801197 3320 TOOLS 10- 4580- 646 -64 796141 3491 LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662 -66 801167 3399 * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 41174 3192 * ** -CKS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 ** -CKS SERV 3/27 -4/9 30- 4201 - 781 -78 FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4120- 140 -14 FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260- 510 -51 FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 13104 3443 * ** -CKS PARTS 10- 4504 - 000 -00 493087 2967 TAPE 10- 4504 - 301 -30 3081 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 322 -30 3233 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 3079 GENERAL SUPPL =IES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 3076 ,. PARTS, 10- 4504 - 646 -64 493086 2966 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 . 3078 TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 493091 2965 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE 077L28 03/06/91 243.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 3235 077L28 02/28/91 160.38 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 490521 2794 077L28 03/06/91 461.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10 =4620- 560 -56 3234 077L28 03/06/91 427:10 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 3077 077L28 03/06/91 101:38 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 3232 077L28 02/28/91 380.32 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 40- 4504- 801 -80 493090 2964 077L28 02/28/91 331.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 493088 2968 077L28 03/06/91 454.41 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 40- 4580- 803 -80 3078 4,318.17 * -- *..... *** -CKS 077L48 03/12/91 195.86 LIEN INFECTION CON CLEANING 27- 4288 - 667 -66 2698 195.86 " - * * * * * *. * ** -CKS 077L56 03/12/91 35:22 LINHOFF DEVELOP.FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 187169 077L56 03/08/91 5.80 LINHOFF MAGAZINE 12- 4215- 434 -43 188047 077L56 03/08/91 8.80 LINHOFF MAGAZINE 12- 4215- 434 -43 186248 077L56 03/08/91 50.50 LINHOFF OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 186242 100:32 " * * * * ** ** -CKS 077L66 02/28/91 150.40 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 121061 3219 - 077L66 02/28/91 171.10 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT SHAFT 10- 454.0- 560 -56 120706 3066 321.50 * ** -CKS 077L97 03/01/91 100.00 MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 42 100.00 077L98 03/06/91 75.46 MIDWEST MACHINERY GASKETS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P03803 3309 75.46 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M02 03/06/91 668:94 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 12568 3365 077M02 03/06/91 138.11 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 12454 3287. 807.05 " 077M03 03/05/91 2,286.30 MN STATE TREA /BLO IN SURCHARGE 10- 3113- 000 -00 2,286.30 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M07 03/12/91 4,237.55 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 077M07 03/08/91 5,981.85 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 10,219.40 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M10 02/28/91 113.95 MARSHALL & SWIFT SERVICE 10- 4504- 200 -20 104756 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 113.95 " * ** -CKS 077M12 03/05/91 282.14 MATHISON CO. COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 681597 3413 282.14 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M14 03/12/91 6.50 MAUMA MEETING 10- 4206 - 140 -14 6.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M16 03/12/91 202.00 MCCAREN DESIGNS PLANTS '30- 4560- 782 -78 4572 202.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M19 03/11/91 2,129.63 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 077M19 03/11/91 892.40 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 077M19 03/11/91 192.99 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 077M19 03/11/91 42.50 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 077M19 03/11/91 61.86 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 077M19 03/11/91 300.00 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 077M19 03/11/91 312.25 _ MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 3;931.63 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M27. 03/06/91 468.76 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 26405 3369 077M27 03/06/91 176.00 MERIT SUPPLY MATS.; 10 =4504- 646 -64 26408 3390 077M27 03/06/91 272.10 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 26317 3240 077M27 03/06/91 327.25 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 26383 3360 077M27 02/28/91 495..00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 26294 3208 077M27 03/06/91 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 26347 3290 077M27 03/06/91 828.00 MERIT SUPPLY STORAGE CABINET 10- 4901 - 640 -64 26325 3161 077M27 03/06/91 828.00- MERIT SUPPLY STORAGE CABINET 10- 4901 - 640 -64 26325 3161 077M27 03/06/91 828:00 MERIT SUPPLY STORAGE CABINET 10- 4901 - 650 -64 26325 3161 077M27 03/12/91 258:80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 702 -70 26458 3529 .077M27 03/06/91 - 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY WYP ALLS 40- 4504- 801 -80 26316 3239 3,707.41 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS, 077M32 03/05/91 377.12 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50 -4632- 822 -82 3567 077M32 03/12/91 299.66 M AMUNDSON MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 3714 077M32 03/05/91 347.16 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 3586 077M32. 03/12/91 201.16 M AMUNDSON MIX:: ... 50- 4632- 862-86 3698 077M32 03/05/91 219.00 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 862 -86 3568 1,444.10 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 077M35 03/05/91 12,226.50 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC CHARGE 10- 3095 - 600 -00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 077M36 02/28/91 RRRRRR METZ BAKING CO 077M44 03/12/91 RRRRRR * 077M46 03/11/91 077M46 03/12/91 R R R R R R MN. CONWAY 077M68 03/06/91 R R * ;;*M ; 00 03/12/91 077M70 03/12/91 RRRRRR METRO ELECTRIC 077M73 03/12/91 077M74 03/06/91 RRRRRR MN SUBURBAN NEWS 077M80 02/28/91 077M80 02/28/91 077M80 03/12/91 077M81 03/08/91 RRRRRR MN. WANNER. 077M85 03/08/91 RRRRRR MONARCH MARKETING 077M92 03/01/91 077M92 03/05/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 12,226.50 449.91 MINVALCO PARTS 449.91 * 101.74 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY 101.74 * 24.57 METZ BAKING CO 5.70 METZ BAKING CO 30.27 * 5.24 MN CELLULAR PHONE 5.24 * 55.00 MN. CONWAY 66.00 MN. CONWAY 121.00 * 91.10 MN. ELEVATOR 91.10 * 72.29 METRO ELECTRIC 72.29 * 17.98 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 13.02 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 122.40 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 153.40 * 59.50 MN. TORO INC. 59.50 * 21.08 MN. WANNER. 21.08 * 121.00 MONARCH MARKETING 3.90 MONARCH MARKETING 124.90 * PAPER SUPPLIES BREAD BREAD MONTHLY CHARGES FOG FLUID GENERAL SUPPLIES SERVICE CONTRACT REPAIRS ADS ADS ADVERTISING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR 03 -18 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 540 -54 21486 2342 * ** -CKS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 3566 3571 27- 4824 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -68 40- 4504 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS 2700 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 440 -44 17661 3530 10- 4504 - 440 -44 17673 3531 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 020433 50- 4248 - 861 -86 5932 -T 3463 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 25739 10- 4210 - 140 -14 25739 27- 4624 - 663 -66 20909 3699 10- 4540 - 646 -64 172836 3195 * ** -CKS 10- 4540- 560 -56 76975 * ** -CKS 50- 4516 - 840 -84 706727 50- 4516 - 860 -86 751110 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * * * 03 -18 -91 077M98 03/11/91 * * * * ** VENDOR 077NO3 02/28/91 MESSAGE 077N08 03/06/91 077N08 02/28/91 077N09 02/28/91 **A-CKS 46.63 077N48 03/05/91 * * * * ** 40- 4254 - 803 -80 077N68 03/08/91 077N68 03/08/91 077N68 03/08/91 * * * * ** 077N76 02/28/91 077N82 03/01/91 077N82 03/08/91 * * * * ** 077N96 03/12/91 077N97 03/11/91 * ** -CKS, 420:00 077N99 03/12/91 077N99 03/12/91 CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 21 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE **A-CKS 46.63 MINNEGASCO GAS 40- 4254 - 803 -80 46.63 * ** -CKS, 420:00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 30296 3391 420.00 " * ** -CKS 24.19 MUELLER SALES CORP. GUAGE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 7991 2974 331.01 MUELLER SALES CORP. GUAGES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 007691 2974 355.20 81:50 MUNICILITE CO. REPAIR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2769 3243 81.50 " **k-CKS 31,808.00 NO STAR TURF 2 NEW MOWERS 27 -1340- 000 -00 294580 3191 31,808.00 * ** -CKS 54.54 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632- 822 -82 103.68 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632- 842 -84 240.30 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 398.52 * ** -CKS 228.92 NTCC PARTS 50 -4540- 821 -82 A01320 3063 228.92 " * ** -CKS 191.38 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 6.13 -61 181716 3266 145.45 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 181942 3403 336.83 * ** -CKS 76.00 MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 76.00 125.40 LIA NICKLOW PT MAINT /GC 23- 4120 - 612 -61 125.40 * ** -CKS 1 46:60 NAOMI JOHNSON ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 39.96 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 9 MESSAGE .: 077N99 03/12/91 18.15 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61 077N99 03/12/91 78.37 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 183.08 " RRRRRR - " ** -CKS 077024 03/08/91 202.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 31453 3255 077024 03/08/91 374.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 31454 3256 077024 03/08/91 518.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 31452 3635 1,094.00 RRRRRR RRR -CKS 077030 03/12/91 23.05 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624- 663 -66 23.05 " RRRRRR _ RRR - CKS..::: 077038 03/12/91 980.00 OLSON FIRE PRO. REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 667 -66 10002 3189 980.00 RRRRR R - . RRR - CK5';`::; 077050 03/06/91 131.03 OWENS SERVICE CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 53995 3465 131.03 " RRRtYRR _ - RRR - CKS...,;';.. 077056 - 03/01/91 742.84 OZALID CORP REPAIR OZLID 10- 4570 - 260 -26 2829 742.84 " - 077P11 03/01/91 51.00 PARK NIC MED CTR DOT EXAM 10- 4201 - 300 --30 077P11 03/01/91 96.90 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS ' 10- 4201 - 440 -44 077P11. 03/01/91 508.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 10- 4212 - 510 -51 077P11 03/05/91 816.10 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 10- 4212 - 510 -51 1,472.00 " 077P13 03/06/91 36,192.03 PRECISION LANDSCAPE TREE TRIMMING 60- 1300 - 014 -18 36,192.03 " RRRRRR 077P24 03/06/91 31.00 PBE FREIGHT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1660 31.00 RRR -CKS. 077P30 03/12/91 148.27 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 077P30 03/12/91 200.05 PEPSI.COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 077P30 03/12/91 259.20 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 607.52 " 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT. * * *R ** 077P34 03/12/91 60.00 PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 8837 60.00 " 077P35 03/08/91 2.90 077P35 03/08/91 29.00 077P35 03/08/91 35.10 077P35 03/08/91 19.55 077P35 03/08/91 9.83 96.38 " 077P36 03/12/91 8.00 077P36 03/12/91 30.00 077P36 03/12/91 37.00 077P36 03/12/91 72.39 . 077P36 03/12/91 63:52 077P36 03/12/91 12.70 077P36 03/12/91 11.00 077P36 03/12/91 21.35 077P36 03/12/91 13.50 077P36 03/12/91 12.46 077P36 03/12/91 27.85 077P36 03/12/91 2.00 077P36 .03/12/91 1.95 077P36 03/12/91 .2.40 077P36 03/12/91 3.20 077P36 03/12/91 13.00 077P36 03/12/91 46.89 077P36 03/12/91 3.81 077P36 03/12/91 23.12 077P36 03/12/91 7.97 077P36 03/12/91 21.62 077P36 03/12/91 5.00 077P36 03/12/91 23.74 077P36 03/12/91 17.95 077P36 03/12/91 30.75 077P36 03/12/91 12.15 077P36 03/12/91 : 6.00 077P36 03/12/91 9.36 470.68.* RRRRRR 077P44 03/12/91 344.62 PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 8837 344.62 " PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 8860 3622 077P48 02/28/91 15.00 077P48 03/08/91 125.50 077P48 03/08/91 5.40 077P48 03/01/91 191.40 337.30 " CHECK REGISTER VENDOR PERSONNEL DECISIONS PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON - BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH `PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHYSIO CONTROL PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING ITEM DESCRIPTION FEE FOR SERVICE UNIFORMS POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKING MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MEETING EXP MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE MEETING EXP POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKING REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARKING GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 03 -18 -91 PAGE - ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE i " " " -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 30- 4262- 782 -78 30- 4290 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4516- 781 -78 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4204 - 490 -49 10- 4204 - 600 -60 10- 4206 - 100 -10 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4206 7160 -16 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 507 -50 10- 4208 - 120 -12 10- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 200 -20 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4208 - 490 -49 10- 4280 - 504 -50 10- 4290 - 160 -16 10- 4504- 200 -20 10- 4504- 490 -49. 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10- 4504 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 627 -60 10- 4508 - 600 -60 28- 4248 - 703 -70 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 45.16- 701.70 29- 4624 - 722 -72 50- 4208 - 842 -84 50- 4504 - 841 -84 10- 4510- 440 -44 A01392 3532 PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 8808 3476 PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 8837 3617 PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 8860 3622 PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 3356 23 * * *- CKS:,;; >. 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION k k k k k k 077P58 03/12/91 28.50 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.50 * kkkkkk . 077P75 03/08/91 240.00 PREMIER OUTDOOR SERV REPAIRS 240.00 * k k k k k k 077P78 03/12/91 104.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SHARPENENING 104.00 * kkkkkk 077P80 03/06/91 5,234.29 PRIOR LAKE AGG. BLACKTOP 5,234.29 " k k *;;Q* 0 02/28/91 155.65 QUICK SERV BATTERY PARTS 077Q20 03/06/91 83.88 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 077Q20 03/06/91 71.28 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 310.81 * k k k k k k 077801 03/12/91 126.30 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR TIRE 126.30 * k k k* k R 077821 03/08/91 396.40 RED WING SHOES SHOES 077821 03/08/91 103.70 RED WING SHOES SHOES 500.10 * 077R22 03/08/91 108.20 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 077822 03/08/91 239.80 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 077822 03/08/91 347.13 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 695.13 * kkk *kk 077833 03/08/91 6,767.95 REX DISTR. BEER 077833 03/08/91 5,325.55 REX DISTR. BEER 077833 03/08/91 4,669.00 REX DISTR. BEER 16,762.50 k k k k k k 077R35 03/12/91 66.00 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO REPAIRS 077R35 03/12/91 216.90 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO REPAIRS 03 -18 -91 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P.O. • MESSAGE * ** -CKS 28- 4504- 702 -70 221539 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 1417 3619 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704 -70 59608 * ** -CKS 10- 4522 - 318 -30 CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38804 3218 10- 4540 - 560 -56 39296 3286 10- 4540 - 560 -56 39898 3381 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 14412 3334 CKS 10- 4642- 301 -30 40- 4262- 801 -80 10- 4504 - 621 -62 01403 3630 10- 4504- 621 -62 01411 3629 30- 4504- 782 -78 1398 3621 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 9598 3698 27- 4248 - 662 -66 9393 3697 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 077R35 03/12/91 077R35 03/12/91 077R35 03/12/91 R R R R R* ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # 077R49 03/06/91 R R R R* R CO 077R51_ 03/12/91 F R R R* R 3646 077R53 03/12/91 * R R R R R 077R65 03/06/91 077R65 03/06/91 2960. 3646 077R73 03/08/91 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO 077R79 03/12/91 07.7R79 03/12/91 077R79 03/12/91 077R79 03/12/91 077R79 03/12/91 077R79 03/12/91 077S07 03/01/91 077S07 03/08/91 07.7S07 03/01/91 077S07 03/01/91 077S07 03/01/91 077S07 03/01/91 077S07 03/01/91 i * * * * ** 077S15 03/05/91 CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 25 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM'DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 33.35- RICHFIELD PLUMB CO REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 2960 3646 33.35 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 2960. 3646 33.35 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO REPAIR 28- 4248 - 702 -70 2960 3646 316.25 " CKS .31.86 ROAD RESCUE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 100360 3446 31.86 * -CKS 95:60 >, RFG PET & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 28051 95,60.E * ** -CKS 37:75 ROBERT B. HILL SALT 10- 4504- 440 -44 27706 2528 37.75 * ** -CKS 2,131.85 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 3442 3,392.00 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 3442 5,523.85 " . ** -CKS` 51.25 ROTO ROOTER SERV. PRO SERVICES 30 -4201- 782 -78 1836 51.25 * ** -CKS 119.95 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260- 510 -51 .10 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 106.25 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 410.55 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 77.35 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 .70 RTW INC. - FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260- 510 -51 714.90 " * ** -CKS ..4.40- SPRUCE CO . CREDIT. 30 -4262- 782 =78 8:45 SPRUCE CO LAUNDRY 30- 4262 - 782 -7.8 3618 4.40 SPRUCE CO CREDIT 30- 4262 - 782 -78 4.40- SPRUCE CO CREDIT 30- 4262- 782.78 12.85 SPRUCE CO LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 4.40 SPRUCE CO CREDIT 30- 4626- 782 -78 4.40- SPRUCE CO CREDIT 4626- 782 -78 16.90 " .30- * ** -CKS 59.99 SEARS REPAIRS 28- 4248- 702 -70 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 59.99 # # # R R # 077S26 03/05/91 3,048.00 077S26 03/05/91 1,866.57 077S26 03/05/91 461:00 . 077S26 03/05/91 773.00 077S26 - 03/05/91 981.00 077S26 03/05/91 591.00 077S26 03/05/91 461.00 077S26 03/05/91 460.00 077S26 03/05/91 460.00 - 077S26 03/05/91 565.00 3485 8,746.57 PRINTING 29- 4600 - 721 -72 3485 077S31 03/12/91 925.22 29- 4600- 721 -72 3485 925.22 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 29- 4600- 721 -72 077S36 03/08/91 2,814.15 077S36 03/08/91 7,218.80 10,032.95 *** -CKS 077S40 03/12/91 13,750.00 13,750.00 077S45 03/08/91 15.61 50- 4630 - 822 -82 15.61 #* # #*# BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 077S50 03/01%91 100.00 100.00 * R R # # # # SPAULDING RANGE BALLS 077S54 03/05/91 213.49 213.49 * .**A-CKS ST. PAUL BOOK 077S67 03/01/91' 3,075.00 3,075.00 * ** -CKS JOHN.SHEPARD 077S72 03/12/91 58.75 CHECK REGISTER G 03 -18 -91 PAGE 26 .VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE * ** -CKS SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 10- 4600- 600 -60 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 10- 4600 - 600 -60 3484 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 23- 4600 - 611 -61 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 26- 4600- 681 -68 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 27- 4600- 661 -66 3485 SEXTON PRINT. PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 29- 4600 - 721 -72 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 29- 4600- 721 -72 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 29- 4600- 721 -72 3485 SEXTON PRINT PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3485 *** -CKS SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 28- 4612- 704 -70 *** -CKS SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS SPAULDING RANGE BALLS 27- 4636- 667 -66 .**A-CKS ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516 - 611 -61 022891.3412 * ** -CKS JOHN.SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112303 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 470 -47 M73335 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 077S72 03/08/91 077S72 03/08/91 077S72 03/08/91 077572 03/08/91 R A A A R R 141490 077S77 03/08/91 077577 03/08/91 077S77 03/08/91 077S77 02/28/91 077578 03/01/91 R R A A A R 077S86 03/08/91 077S87 03/06/91 077S87 03/06/91 * R A * A * 077T02 03/08/91 *Art *"* SUPRA COLOR LABS 077T05 03/05/91 AAAAt�R 077T08 03/08/91 077T08 03/08/91 AAAAAA SW SUB CABLE COMM 077T13 03/12/91 077T13 03/12/91 AAAAAA 077T29 03/06/91 077T30 03/08/91 AMOUNT 162.07 132.75 162.07 162:07- 353.57 " 6.74 18.48 78.75 18.32 122.29 " 33.85 33.85 26.74 26.74 " 5,750.00 5,383.81 11,133.81 12.50 12.50 402.00 402.00 " 40.22 10.58 50.80 436.80 327.60 764.40 13,236.15 13,236.15 * 6,580.15 6,580.15 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION STREICHERS AMMUNITION STREICHERS AMMUNITION STREICHERS AMMUNITION STREICHERS AMMUNITION 03 -18 -91 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4572 - 420 -42 15903 3088 10- 4572- 420 -42 3574 10- 4572 - 420 -42 3088 10- 4572 - 420 =42 15903 3088 * "* -CKS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK 10- 4248 -560- 56-116826 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET LAMP ASM 10- 4540 - 560 -56 141490 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BUMPER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 141310 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEARS 10- 4540- 560 -56 141172 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 3353 * ** -CKS SUPRA COLOR LABS PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 420 -42 382001 SW SUB CABLE COMM THIRD QUARTER 12- 4224- 434 -43 SW SUB CABLE COMM SECOND QUARTER 12- 4224 - 434 -43 A *A -CKS TAMARACK GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 142738 3616 * "* -CKS THE PRINT SHOP MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 10- 4504- 628 -62 15978 3264 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4504- 860 -86 * ** -CKS TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201- 644 -64 TOM HORWATH TREE TRIM 10- 4201 - 980 -64 A A A -CKS; THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTION 10- 4201 - 220 -22 THORPE DISTR. BEER 50 -4630- 862 -86 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION R R R R k R 077T40 03/06/91 119.88 TOLL COMPANY OXYGEN PROPANE 119.86 RRRRRR 077T88 03/08/91 44.80 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 44.80 R R R R R k 077U08 03/08/91 4,465.81 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 077U08 03/08/91 384.05 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,849.86 k k R R R R 077U14 03/06/91 109.45 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 109.45 " R R R R R R- 077U25 03/12/91 25.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 077U25 03/12/91 37.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 62.00 " *RRRRk 077U30 03/01/91 21:00 US WEST PAGING PAGER /VINCE 21.00 R R R R R R 077V15 03/01/91 480.95 VAN PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 480.95 R R R k R R 077V30 02/28/91 980.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 980.00 " R R R R R k 077V46 03/06/91 428.40 VESSCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 077V46 02/28/91 . 2,549.00 VESSCO CHLORINATOR 2,977.40 077V80 03/06/91 46.80 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMP 077V80 03/06/91 209.94 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP REPAIR PARTS 077V80 02/28/91 379:68 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 077V80 02/28/91 290.88 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP. LAMPS 03 -18 -91 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 116510 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 3432 * ** -CKS 10-4510-440-44:760058 2531 10- 4510- 440 -44 760102 2531 * ** -CKS 10- 4256- 646 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 349168 3477 * ** -CKS 30- 4248 - 783 -78 11499 3422 *.* -CKS 40- 4504- 805 -80 9229 3379 40- 4504 - 805 -80 9065 2882 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 283520 3382 10-4540- 540 -54 283197 3311 23- 4504- 611 -61 282565 3159 27- 4504. - 662 -66 282631 3210 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 077V80 02/28/91 161.84- VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 27- 4540- 662 -66 282633 765.46 " " " "- CKS'''. 077WO8 03/06/91 19.18 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 3241 077WO8 03/06/91 116.38 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 335 -30 3241 07,7WO8 03/06/91 52.66 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 460 -46 3301 077WO8 03/06/91 28.92 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 460 -46 3301 077WO8 03/06/91 221.62 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3377 438.76 " i " "" -CKS:. 077W15 03/01/91 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " " "" -CKS 077W44 03/06/91 162.92 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 85000 3061 162.92 " ....." CKS 077W49 03/08/91 67.3.40 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT ELEC;WORK 25- 4900 - 006 -54 27792 1658 673.40 " .. *.." " "" -CKS 077W52 03/01/91 100.00 WILLIAM WALSH POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " **. -CKS f 077W71 03/06/91 568.25 WINFLD DEV RENT TRU RENT 10 -4201- 627 -62 010816 568.25 ...... " "" -CKS 077W76 .03/12/91 355.95 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY BASKETS 2774636- 667 -66 53347 3205 355.95 " ... ".. " "" -CKS 077W92 03/01/91 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " ". "... " "" -CKS 077Z14 03/06/91 226.71 ZIEGLER INC PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 3454 226.71 " " "" ■:" " "" -CKS 077Z99 03/11/91 60.41 BOBO ZINN SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -91 PAGE 30 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60.41 * * * -CKS 262,624.40 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 35.00 FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. 11,173.45 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3,551.60 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 6,385.40 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 773.00 FUND 26.TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 77,344.05 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 4,613.07 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 551.73 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 7,734.23 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 14,773.58 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 101,026.86 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 78,637.69 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 569;:224.06 TOTAL -