Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991-06-17_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMBPT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1991 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adoption of Consent Agenda Items is made by the Commissioners as to HRA - items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of June 3, 1991 * II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MIUTES of Regular Meeting of June 3, 1991 and Special Meeting of June 10, 1991 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition. A. Street Surfacing With Concrete Curb & Gutter Improvement No. BA -294 Wooddale Avenue from West 70th Street to Belvidere Lane; West Shore Drive from West 70th Street to Dunham Drive; and Andover Road from Wooddale Avenue to West Shore Drive B. Concrete Sidewalk Improvement No. S -54 - Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Delaney Boulevard (South Side) III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4 /5.favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Conditional Use Permit - St. Patrick's Church, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Ventana Jyland Addition - Lot 2, Block 1, Muir Woods * C. Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Revisions - Tax Increment Districts (Contd from 05/20/91) (Continue to 08/05/91) * D. Set Hearing Date - Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision - Arrow Sign Company (07/01/91) IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council June 17, 1991 Page 2 9 LI4:bX#)SB3$1R * A. Computer and Software for Edina Public Safety * B. Ventilation Modification - Public Works Building (Contract 91 -11) * C. Air Conditioning - Senior. Center Relocation * D. Hallway and Door Construction - Senior Center Relocation * E. Reconstruction of #3 tee - Braemar Golf Course * F. Handrailing - Arneson Acres Muse * G. Self - Propelled Sweeper (Contd from 6/3/91) VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Report on Crown Vetch at 4404 West 58th Street B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 06/11/91 C. Park Board Recommendations Meeting 1. Fees and Charges - Centennial Lakes Park p.m. 2. Golf Course Recommendation D. Raccoon Control Program * E. Purchasing Policy for Recycled Products VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Sandra Maloney - Request for Watermain Connection Charge to be Assessed VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. Local Option Sales Tax B. Metropolitan Council Regional Breakfast Meetings IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 06/17/91: Total $2,032,585.43; pre -list dated 06/17/91: Total $14,172.27 and for Confirmation of Payment of Claims dated 05/31/91: Total $865,369.77 0 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS June 29 & 30 -Grand Opening of Centennial Lakes Park Centennial Lakes Park (Ribbon cutting 4:45 p.m. on Saturday, June 29) Mon July 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Thurs July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED Mon July 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JUNE 3, 1991 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, and Richards. (Commissioner Smith entered the meeting at 7:11 P.M.). Chairman Richards announced that HRA Agenda Item II. - Rebate of Excess Tax Increments - Edina School District would be moved to the Council Agenda for, action by the City Council. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve and adopt KRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OY THE MEETING OF MAY 20, 1991, ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve the HRA Minutes of May 20, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote'- four ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve payment of the following HRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated -6 /3/91, and consisting of one page totalling $59,341.20. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four "ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK NO. DATE 168704 06/12/91 168705 06/12/91 *xxx ** 01- 4218 - 134 -12 168707 06/12/91 01- 1390 - 132 -12 808107 408 168730 06/12/91 *xx * *x 168736 06/12/91 168736 06/12/91 168736 06/12/91 168737 06/12/91 168738 06/12/91 168739 06/12/91 R * * x x x 168744 06/12/91 x x x x x i lt$$#8 06/12/91 168747 06/12/91 168748 06/12/91 168749 06/12/91 168750 06/12/91 168751 06/12/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 20,300.00 MN VALLEY LSCAPE PHASE 4 RES 20,300.00 * 3,041.18 METRO ELECTRIC PARK CENTRUM 3.041.18 * 6,874.57 6,874.57 " 120,210.89 120,210.89 2,846.95 1,141.00 312.50 4,300.45 * 728.50 728.50 * 2,772.41 2,772.41 * 500.00 500.00 * 154.20 154.20 528.60 528.60 * 372.66 372.66 * 2,000.00 2,000.00 * 12,000.00 12,000.00 * 4,750.71 4,750.71* 5,657.50 BRW INC SHAW LINDQUIST DORSEY & WHITNEY DORSEY & WHITNEY DORSEY & WHITNEY JC PENNEYS BRAUN INTEREC ADT SECURITY SYST BEST LOCK SYSTM /MN Pink Companies KOALA BEAR KARE LAKELAND NURSERY MASTER ELECTRIC CO SMITH & HAWKINS INGRAM EXCAVATING ARCH FEES PARK IMPROVEMENT 06 -17 -91 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 1315 - 132 -12 8984A 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1319 - 131 -12 62025 01- 1390 - 132 -12 LEGAL FEES 01- 4218 - 132 -12 241180 LEGAL FEES 01- 4218 - 132 -12 241180 LEGAL FEES 01- 4218 - 134 -12 241180 BLINDS 01- 1390 - 132 -12 808107 408 RAMP TESTING 01- 1319 - 131 -12 003301 SECURITY 01 -1340- 132 -12 CENTRUM LOCKS 01- 1390 - 132 -12 015687 4484 CARPET GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION PHASE 4 RES FURNITURE PH 4 RES 01- 1390 - 132 -12 538886 411 01- 1340 - 132 -12 014730 01- 1315 - 132 -12 01- 1315 - 132 -12 4055 01 -1390- 132 -12 01- 1315 - 132 -12 396 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS k**-CKS * ** -CKS * "* -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 168751 06/12/91 1,754.50 7,412.00 * 168752 06/12/91 322.10 ' 322.10 * 168753 06/12/91 38,370.50 38,370.50 * 168754 06•/12/91 9.90 9.90 * * * * * ** 224,648.67 224.648.67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR INGRAM EXCAVATING CLIFCRAFT MANUF AMES CONSTR HENN CTY TREASURER ITEM DESCRIPTION PHASE 4 RES EQUIPMENT GRADING STATE DEED TAX FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA TOTAL 06 -17 -91 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O # MESSAGE 01- 1315 - 132 -12 369 01- 1340 - 132 -12 1201 401 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1310 - 132 -12 i * * * -CKS e '�r 11 )e: ,REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards and Council From:Eugene D. Davis,Environmenta: and Ass't Weed Inspector Date: June 14,1991 Subject: Crown Vetch located at 4404 West 58th Street Recommendation: Agenda Item # VT-A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑' Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ - Ordinance is respectfully requested that the City Council declare the crop of Crown Vetch located at the above mentioned address, and in its present state, to be a nuisance under Sec. 2(e) of Ordinance No. 1031. It is further requested that the City Council order, it to be brought.within the below compliance standards as recommended by the staff. Info /Background: Ordinance No. 1031, Section 2, Sub.(e) declares as a nuisance: All noxious weeds and other RANK GROWTHS OF VEGETATION, including any grass or weeds standing over one foot high... In addition, this ordinance in Section 5, Sub.(b) provides that the weed inspector or assistant weed inspector of the City may enter upon property to cut, remove, destroy and eradicate RANK GROWTHS OF VEGETATION... The ordinance does not define the work "rank." However, the dictionary defines "rank" as "growing profusely," and "strong and offensive," and indecent or disgusting." The subject Crown Vetch has reached a general height of 24 inches, and is invading neighboring lawns. In the fall it mats down and could become a health and fire hazard. Therefore, staff believes the Crown Vetch to be a "rank growth of vegetation" and a nuisance. COMPLIANCE STANDARDS: Staff recommends the Crown Vetch be cut to, and maintained at, a height of 8 inches. Crown Vetch is spread by underground runners and is an invasive plant and difficult to eradicate. Precautions must be taken to insure its confinement to the intended area. 'These precautions must be in the form of a,metal shield driven at least 10 inches into the ground at the property line or a cultivated strip at least 10 inches deep at the property line. Therefore, Staff recommends that staff be rected to give notice to the owner pursuant to the applicable City ordinance to cut 1 maintain the Crown Vetch at 8 inches, and contain the Crown Vetch by the above or ,,cher means. Staff further recommends that if the owner does not comply with the above standards, that City staff be directed to cause such compliance under and pursuant to applicable City ordinances. j 4 Av Z 01 4. i I f �4'J�� `I t - a`�� { (�(> 1,.1 � i ., j ' ., �� �V 1` �?-rf. ';`,�+ \ ` � 1 till le. T-i Nis le jr. ka, -wl pip; Crown Vetch 1. Description: Dr. Porter of the Minnesota Extension Service of the University of Minnesota referred us to Leon Snyder's book: "Flowers for Northern Gardens;' University Press, 1983 wherein: A small genus of about 20 species of herbs or shrubs, native in the Old World; leaves odd - pinnate; flowers pealike, in axillary umbels, yellow, or sometimes purple or white; standard orbicular, reflexed; stamens 10, 9 united and 1 free; fruit a slender legume, constricted between the seeds. He goes on to describe CROWN VETCH as: A sprawling plant, native in Europe but naturalized in the eastern United States; leaflets oblong, in 5 to 10 pairs; flowers pink or white to 1.25 cm. long; petals with'claws about as long as the calyx. 2. Leon Snyder describes the USES of CROWN VETCH as: A coarse ground cover that should be planted only for erosion control on steep banks. He suggests that it should not be planted in the flower border since it will crowd out more desirable plants. Don Dimond and Michael MacCaskey of the Chevron Chemical Company, writing in: "All About Ground Covers;' mentions that CROWN VETCH is weed - choking and is one of the most popular ground covers for erosion control. He further states that highway departments have used it extensively. 3. CROWN VETCH is characterized as a LEGUME CROP. WHAT IS A LEGUME PLANT? Dr. Firman E. Bear, Ph.D. of Rutgers University,describes legumes as any plant of a family that bears pods or seed vessels. These are . commonly chosen for green manuring purposes in preference to other crops because they contain high percentages of phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and other mineral elements and because their nodules contain additional amounts.of atmospheric nitrogen... Vetch has come into prominence in recent years by reason of its rapid rate of growth and its very remarkable capacity to accumulate nitrogen. His charts indicate that CROWN VETCH is rich in nitrogen and phosphoric acid and extremely rich in potash. Page 2, CROWN VETCH, Cont'd 4. What are the PROBLEMS that arise from the growing of CROWN VETCH in an urban neighborhood? Leon Snyder has mentioned that CROWN VETCH should not be planted in the flower border since it will crowd out more desirable plants also that it should be planted only as an erosion control on steep banks. Don Dimond and Michael MacCaskey states that it dies back in the winter and the mass of brown stems can be a fire hazard in some areas. Dr. Eugene D. Davis, Environmentalist, City of Edina, states that CROWN VETCH spreads tumultuously throughout the seeded or planted area and beyond. (Exhibit 1 and 2) Eleven (11) Edina Residents who live near and around the property feel that the property in question negatively effects the value of their property. They also ascertain that it is unsightly, unkept, and should be declared a nuisance by the city council.(Exhibit 3 and 4 ) 5. Does the growing of CROWN VETCH, in anyway, represent a HEALTH HAZARD to residents? An exhaustive investigation, in concert with interviews with the Hennepin County Agricultural Inspector, and the Edina Health Inspector indicated that there is no health hazard to be found in the growing of or living around CROWN VETCH. (with the exception of the fire hazard mentioned previously) 6. How much water does CROWN VETCH need in its growing life ?. Dimond and MacCaskey in "All About Ground Covers" mention that once established, fertilizer is not needed. Crown vetch is DROUGHT - RESISTANT and prefers full sun light but tolerates some shade. It spreads by underground runners, so it can be invasive and difficult to eradicate. They suggest mowing in the spring to create a beautiful green summer carpet. Page 3, CROWN VETCH, Cont'd 7. What would a survey of Richfield. Bloomington, and St. Louis Park Officials yield as to anticipated action should a similar situation occur in their cities? Interviews with the Assistant Weed Inspectors of each of the above mentioned communities were conducted. Each inspector was glad the problem was ours and not theirs. None had a suggestion as what our course of action might be. Incidentially, none had been contacted by any Edina resident about or concerning CROWN VETCH. 8. Some possible courses of action for the city council. A. Declare that Ms. Diane Lundgren is within her rights to grow her crop of CROWN VETCH on her property. B. Declare that the CROWN VETCH is a Public Nuisance and order its removal. This could be based on the fact that it spreads tumultuously, is invasive, and extremely difficult to eradicate. It could, and to some extent is, invading the nearby lawns. A far more evasive argument, and an extremely difficult one to support would be that it is adversely effecting property values of surround- ing properties. C. Declare that the CROWN VETCH represents a health hazard as when it starts to "lodge" it will create a bedding of dried stems and vegetation which will constitute a FIRE HAZARD. D. Declare that Ms. Lundgren's property exists in violation of the city weed and grass ordinance and must be mowed to a height not to exceed twelve (12) inches. This mowing will not destroy the crop but rather create a beautiful green summer carpet. E. Refer the entire matter to the WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER (Mediation: Form of First Resort) 32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 214, Hopkins, MN 55343. They seem to have a remarkable record of being able to solve problems of residents who can not gain . satisfaction through existing laws or ordinances. ty.a i aVrf Ol _— t '.ten a _ r� 1yJ �'�. M1 '� r 'a "L'� •F; T l•4 S'I. t ., -jades i _ ` •' � �.V- �^'r'a % r" ry !.A / •' �'. l..a�� '7.5 � cr ;a �c r -. rl) � AMj�'71�.•. 1��'A�.`+4 � '�`., X15., .� A�J•JT�T� -►' r `,�i� -:.l.. � r,',� Si aif•�c �Y1.�c'. yY� Jf: •. r 'y re.. .. yr ice,. � ti °` r < <_{�� � '� •sj J 11i � C° t `y . �>. rr�- �i,yp��r �'+r1.!5"-�. �'d -�, � �• - '. f tip. , i • ~`, � � J••�J • _ f f N r•_. -ir c� Y•F _, ^n t �,tnr".yy'�.P .1;�y fy,tir•; a '+ .sue• � ~ ��a ..' [ � � -! .ytJ ��NGGa`R �!t'{ -� A t � �� '! 1, .r. - 1 /�, t } s h,� .aaa ,� �. /r d. '1 �` ��'Al •"^ '°Q«ia ...�. ,att' - -:r .� S ,',�_.� �1 7ff � r . ^i ,.3jY� ! ✓� �,1'�' T �.'-'fFr¢ ' F_s e. 3� I 110 40 (7) 30 eo eo eo 30 10 (49)' I0 r.10 P 6 !2 .... ...... e. M. e9• A' i X70.0 2 ., .+ 4 g 5 e )j( 9 10 i o 12 13 (92) - (93) - (94) . (96) = 97i - (98) =r V) (99) - R WOODLAND ,.52.2,. `., (16) �3 i9 0 c20 3) _ � ►e �. 3 4428 4424 4 O 4418 , 4 12 ,. 43 8 4324 is 416 431 14 "o P �.. I 14 - (18) 18� • a. 18 to IN F4IS AWN ( IT) Q�� 'o (19) 5 d{ (21) eEGIN &IT" No is - it ......; (20) - -I Ilu G.A. NJODWUV /� �I 2 „ (Tl) 2 W (7g). 4 T9) s 80) e_ (81) (82) e (83 9 (94) �' (85) (86) (87) (88) (76) _1V of 0 18 gEZ8 24 4 0 4 18 12 4 08 44 4 44 0 4328 4324 43 1� �.� PH ROOK LA 3� I 110 40 60 30 eo eo eo r.10 2 ., .+ 4 g 5 e )j( 9 10 i o 12 13 (92) - (93) - (94) (95) ^-• (96) = 97i - (98) =r V) (99) - ( 100) - ( 101) = ( 102) - ( 103) - ( 104 4428 4424 4 O 4418 , 4 12 408 4 04 4400 ao 43 8 4324 4 O 416 431 R ' 58TH ST W n . 37 , i i s. 2, w e0 1 24 . I (73) S 152) (51) (3,) (31) s (11) ) 72 IM 17 13;.29 134 29 134.29 I1 i u: [ding Ciiv Council Members hGrJ�: Catherine Sheehan 4308 Phiibrook Lane DATE: May 31, "1991 i wish to express my disapproval of the permission that was granted to the resident at 4404 W. 58th St. to plant or encourage the growth of a tall, scraggly weed in the back yard which borders Philbrook Lane. Without exception, the residents on W. 58th St. whose property backs onto Philbrook have kept their back yards neat and attractive for all of the 20 years that I have lived in my home. Just recently, when I installed central air conditioning in my home, I was required by the, city to write a letter to every household whose property adjoined mine because my unit would be slightly closer to the property line than the code and therefore, required a variance. I also had to write to the city engineer, to request a hearing before the council and was told it would be necessary to appear in person before the full council to gain this permission. All of this was required for a compressor that was down a hill, between my house and the neighbor's garage and completely out of sight and hearing of anyone at the street level. I complied with all of these rules. Here we have a full back yard exposed to everyone who rides, walks and lives on the street and apparently no permission was required from anyone in the neighborhood before this ugly growth was allowed to propagate. It would seem to me that this would and should come into the category of requiring a variance as well. I urge you, please, to rectify this error in the city code immediately and to also please deal with the owner of that property. It affects not only the appearance of our street but also the property values. No single person in the city government should be allowed to arbitrarily give permission for such a change in a complete back yard. Rc C 1 6 -.f" R f TO: Edina City Council Members FROM: Catherine Sheehan 4308 Philbrook Lane • DATE: May 31,1991 i wish to express my disapproval of the permission that was granted to the resident at 4404 W. 58th St. to plant or encourage the growth of a tall, scraggly weed in the back yard which borders Philbrook Lane. Without exception, the residents on W. 58th St. whose property backs onto Philbrook have kept their back yards neat and attractive for all of the 20 years that I have lived in my home. just recently, when I installed central air conditioning in my home, I was required by the city to write a letter to every household whose property adjoined mine because my unit would be slightly closer to the property line than the code and therefore, required a variance. I also had to write to the city engineer, to request a hearing before the council and was told it would be necessary to appear in person before the full council to gain this permission. All of this was required for a compressor that was down a hill, between my house and the neighbor's garage and completely out of sight and hearing of anyone at the street level. I complied with all of these rules. Here we have a full back yard exposed to everyone who rides, walks and lives on the street and apparently no permission was required from anyone in the neighborhood before this ugly growth was allowed to propagate. It would seem to me that this would and should come into the category of requiring a variance as well. I urge you, please, to rectify this error in the city code immediately and to also please deal with the owner of that property. It affects not only the appearance of our street but also the property values. No single person in the city government should be allowed to arbitrarily give permission for such a change in a complete back yard. ,i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 3, 1991_ ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards. (Member Smith entered the meeting at 7:11 P.M. after the Consent Agenda was adopted). CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Rice and vas seconded by Member Paulus to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented with the exception of removal of Item VI.C. - Traffic Signal Plan Approval - Interlachen Boulevard/Vernon Av. Rollca_ll : Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 20, 1991, APPROVED Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular . Meeting of May 20, 1991, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A40 GRANTED FIRST READING (PRELIMINARY REZONING - R -1 TO PCD FOR 3916 AND 3918 WEST 44TH STREET - DURR. LTD.) Planner Larsen recalled that the subject hearing was continued from May 6, 1991, for preliminary rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD -1, Planned Commercial District for property at 3926 and 3918 West 44th Street owned by Kenneth Durr of Durr, Ltd. The continuation was granted so that the proponent could investigate financing options. The proposal remains unchanged as presented on May 6, 1991 - a two story addition of 10,600 square feet going westerly from the existing Durr building for a total floor area of 20,100 square feet. There would also be 20 parking spaces added to the site making a total of 28 parking spaces. If the Council grants preliminary approval it should be contingent on two subsequent actions. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required to designate the subject property as Commercial from the current designation of High Density Residential for the existing Durr building and Low Density Attached Residential for the westerly two properties. A parking variance for 22 spaces as a furniture use would also be necessary and would be considered by the Board of Appeals.. Public Comment: John Sponsel, 3903 -05 Morningside Road, expressed concern that because of the sandy soil conditions, construction of the retaining wall shown on the proposed landscaping plan would cause damage to his double garage located five feet from the proposed wall. Jo Ellen Hurr, representing the Edina Morningside Condominium Association, spoke to the following concerns about the proposed Durr development: 1) The increase.in size by 112% would change the original retail development scale and flavor of the area. A goal of the 44th /France Redevelopment Plan was to provide a transitional buffer for the single family homes. Mr. Durr's plan does not provide the buffer. 2) Parking variance, if granted, would seta lenient standard for further redevelopment in the area. The proponent does not meet the hardship requirements for granting the variance. 3) Setback - Site plan indicates heavy landscaping on the west and north of the proposed new area. Trees shown to the north are not on the proponent's property and should not be considered as part of the landscape buffer provided by the proponent. I } 4) If the property is rezoned, would it allow another type of furniture store that may not be perceived as a good neighbor. John Rimarcik, owner of Convention Grill at 3912 Sunnyside Road, spoke in favor of tt proposed Durr property expansion, and said he would be concerned as to what may come into that property if Mr. Durr cannot expand and chooses to leave. Wayne Courtney, 4313 Eton Place, said he was concerned about commercial encroachment into the residential area and did not want to see the commercial area extended on West 44th Street any further than it is at the present time. He added that many of the Morningside residents have the same concern. Mayor Richards noted that letters objecting to the rezoning had been received from Donald /Ruth Arndt, 3911 Morningside Road, and Lois /Dennis Lane, 4006 W. 44th Street. A letter in support of the rezoning was received from Ernest Ring, 3918 W. 44th Street. Presentation by Proponent Kenneth Durr, proponent, commented that at the May 6, 1991 meeting he had been concerned about financing. Subsequently, he has considered three other possible locations, has had discussions with finance people concerning their present location and the new locations, has talked to a broker about potential buyers for the existing store and the two homes, and has investigated the sale_ of other owned properties to finance the project in lieu of bank financing. After considering these options, his first choice is to make the improvements and stay in Edina. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed rezoning. The most recent redevelopment plan proposal provides for commercial use of the property. As proposed, it is not an intense use of the property. Mr. Durr then addressed comments and questions that have been raised, summarized as follows: 1) Concern of Morningside Road resident regarding looking at parking lot - The lot will be ten feet lower than the top of the hill and will not be visible from Morningside Road. 2) Concern regarding damage to garage at 3903 -05 Morningside Road - In 36 years of building, they have successfully constructed higher retaining walls,in similar sandy conditions. 3) Concern about overnight parking lot problems - They want to avoid any activity in the parking lot that is not related to their business and any damage would be covered by liability insurance. 4) Concern by condominium residents about the hill - There are no plans-to change the grade on the hill; Durr, Ltd. does not own the hill.' 5) Devaluation of adjacent properties - Because of the condition of the existing two homes proposed to be rezoned, the expansion will be an improvement. 6) Likes Durr, Ltd. just as it is - Durr, Ltd. is a use that is community friendly, is a quiet business and an asset to the community. Mr. Durr concluded by saying that everyone has been appreciative of what Durr, Ltd. has done to improve the corner and he has heard no criticism from the residents in the neighborhood. He asked the residents to consider what other uses there might be of the property if Durr, Ltd. relocated. Council Comment Member Kelly asked if the property -were to be rezoned could it be specific as to an interior design studio. Attorney Erickson responded that the categories in the Zoning Ordinance are not that specific. If rezoned to Planned Commercial all uses allowed within that zoning would be allowed uses, if all other requirements were met. 1 rM Member Rice asked for clarification on the previous request by the proponent for public financing assistance. Mr. Durr responded that none whatsoever is being requested now; the project will be financed privately. Member Rice commented that what has happened at 44th /France over the last 10 -12 years has all been positive. Regarding parking, the proposed parking is inadequate and would be even more so in the future if a more intense use of the'property occurred. As to commercial encroachment on the residential neighborhood, he suggested that the line be drawn at the westerly property line of the Durr proposal. Member Rice concluded by saying he favored the proposed project and use. Mayor Richards recalled that the issue of commercial encroachment on residential was raised some years ago when the bank on West 50th Street proposed expansion and asked if some similar action could be applied to the Durr proposal if approved. Attorney Erickson recalled that in addition to the zoning, the City did acquire a strip of land from the bank on the west side as a buffer to be under the control.of the property owners to the west. He said imposing a conservation restriction would be similar action. Member Rice made a motion to approve preliminary rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PC -1, Planned Commercial District for property located at 3916 and 3918 W. 44th Street, and moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A40 as follows, conditioned upon: 1) Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan, 2) Execution of a conservation restriction on the westerly Durr property line to serve as a buffer, and 3) Parking variance be applied for and obtained and be specific to the use as proposed, so that if uses change so as to require more parking, more parking will have to be provided to allow such changed uses: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A40 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (PCD -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Commercial District (Sub- District PCD -1) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of the West 1/2 of Lot 80 lying South of the North 130 feet thereof, including adjacent 8' of West 44th Street vacated, Morningside Addition. - Sec. 2., This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for preliminary rezoning was seconded by Member Kelly. For the record, Mayor Richards clarified that no tax increment financing has been granted for the proposed project and that by granting preliminary rezoning approval the Council would not be attempting to save the 44th /France Tax Increment District. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *HEARING DATE OF 6117/91 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus setting June 17, 1991, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Conditional Use Permit - St. Patrick's Church, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane, 2) Preliminary Plat Approval - Ventana- Jyland Addition - Lot 2, Block 1, Muir Woods. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED: VACATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT GRANTED FOR LOTS 4.5.6. CLARK'S 2ND ADDITION Mayor Richards recalled that the public hearing on the request for vacation of a portion of the conservation easement on Lot 5, Clark's 2nd Addition had been continued at the last meeting so that an amendment could be drafted and the proposed conservation easement line could be adjusted across Lots 4, 5, and 6. No �r public comment or objection was heard. Member Smith made a motion directing the Mayor and Manager to sign an amendment to the conservation as to Lots 4, 5, and 6, Clark's 2nd Addition, to evidence of record the release of the vacated easements below described, and for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION VACATING CONSERVATION EASEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 6th day of May, 1991, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for conservation purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 20th day.of May, 1991, and concluded on the 3rd day of June, 1991, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation, affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric,'telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota that the following described portion of the conservation easement be and is vacated effective as of June 4, 1991: That part of the conservation easement over, under and across Lot 4, Block 1, CLARK'S 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minn sots, lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 46 seconds West, along the west line of said 'Lot 4, a distance of 221.16 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence North 51 degrees 56. minutes 14 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 4, a distance of 57.95 feet; thence South 50 degrees 26 minutes 08 seconds East 104.71 feet; thence South 81 degrees 39 minutes 06 seconds East 36.80 feet; thence North 49 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds East 31.03 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence South 65 degrees 31 minutes 16 seconds East 14.34 feet to the intersection with the east line of said Lot 4 and said line there terminating. That part of the conservation easement over, under and across Lot 5, Block 1, CLARK'S 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 5; thence on an assumed bearing of North 19 degrees 08 minutes 20 seconds East, along the West line of said Lot 5, a distance of 210.70 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 65 degrees 31 minutes 16 seconds East 117.50 feet to the intersection with the east line,of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. That part of the conservation easement over, under and across Lot 6, Block 1, CLARK'S 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence on an assumed bearing of North 14 degrees 55.minutes 19 seconds East, along the vest line of said Lot 6, a distance of 155.42 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence South 65 degrees 31 minutes 16 seconds East 37.28 feet and said line there terminating. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Rinnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards d t d ' aope . CONCERN OF RESIDENTS REGARDING PROPERTY AT 4404 'WEST 58TH STREET EEARD Steve Busch, 4208 Philbrook Lane, spoke to the letter dated May 31, 1991, and addressed to the Mayor and Council concerning the property at 4404 West 58th Street on which a crop of crown vetch was planted in July, 1989, in the backyard facing Philbrook Lane. He stated that this crop is highly offensive and is a nuisance to the residents in the neighborhood. The owner does not comply with the City's regulations as to the maximum height permitted of 12 inches and does not keep it cleared away from the curb face. He read a letter from Catherine Sheehan, 4308 Philbrook Lane, addressed to the Council expressing her objections to the crown vetch. Mr. Busch said they had contacted staff of surrounding cities who had said they would not tolerate this type of vegetation. They had also contacted the University of Minnesota Horticulture Department who said crown vetch would normally grow to a height of 3 -4 feet. In order to properly grow this crop it should be cut at least twice during the growing season and if not totally cut down in the fall of the year it becomes a fire hazard. Additionally, the residents are concerned that this will negatively affect property values. In summary, Mr. Busch said the neighbors are asking for help from the Council to address this nuisance. Also speaking in objection were: Jane Swanson, 4408 West 58th Street, who submitted a letter from Marge Buss, 4400 Philbrook Lane; Helen Nettle, former resident at 4404 West 58th Street; Rodger Jensen, 4420�Philbrook Lane; Pat MacNamara, 4412 Philbrook Lane; Kurt Pollak.4415 Philbrook Lane; Donald Nelson 4328 Philbrook Lane; Mike Sitek, 4400 West 58th Street; and Don Anderson, 4304 Philbrook Lane. Mayor Richards commented that, at present it appears, that the property owner is in compliance with existing laws and City ordinances. .With a consensus of the Council, staff could be directed to draft an ordinance amendment in response to the concerns that have been expressed. Following discussion on the subject, the information presented, and given the fact that the Council generally does not regulate what happens on private property, Member Kelly made a motion directing staff ,to bring back on June 17 ,1991, additional information and recommendations as to whether or not the subject vegetation is a health threat to the community, should be permitted on an entire yard, is visual pollution, and further information from surrounding communities on how they regulate this type of growth. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. INQUIRY MADE REGARDING PURCHASE OF LAND FROM CITY Ron Johnson, 6700 Rosemary Lane, advised that he is planning an addition to his house and asked if the City would consider vacating public property or selling him approximately 112 square feet to allow him to construct the addition. Mayor Richards suggested that he work with the City Planner and go through the formal process on this matter. *AWARD OF BID FOR SELF - PROPELLED SWEEPER CONTINUED TO 6/17191 Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to continue the award of bid for a self - propelled sweeper to the June 17, 1991, Council meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BID AWARDED FOR IMPROVEMMT NOS. WM -371 (BROWNDALE AV). STS -210 (BEARD AV) STS -211 (OAKLAWN AV). STS -213 (VALLEY VIEV RD). STS -215. EASEMENT LINE 4603 ANNAWAY DR TO MAIT IN, AND STS -216. (MIRROR LAKES DR) Engineer Hoffman advised that excellent bids were received for the 1991 improvement projects that the Council had approved under the Five Year Storm Sewer Capital Plan at its meeting of February 19, 1991. He pointed out that Storm Sewer Improvement No. 215 was added to provide drainage for two lots c Annaway Drive. Watermain Improvement No. 371 is a maintenance project to repair a broken watermain at the Mill Pond. .Member Rice made a motion for award of bid for Watermain Improvement No. WN -371 and Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -210, STS -211, STS -213, STS -215 and STS -216 to recommended low bidder, G.L. Contracting, Inc., at $346,844.15. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. (Member Paulus was out of the room when rollcall vote was taken.) *BID AWARDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT AMBULANCE Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for an ambulance chassis to recommended bidder, Astleford Chassis, at $32,758.00 and for an ambulance module to recommended bidder, Road Rescue, at $53,989.00 for a total of $86,747.00. Motion was carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR AERATOR FOUNTAIN AT BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for an aerator fountain at Braemar Golf Course to sole bidder, MTI Distributing, at $6,979.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BIDS REJECTED FOR POOL RENOVATION /AOUATIC CENTER: PROJECT TO BE RE -BID Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus to reject all bids for the municipal pool renovation /aquatic center and to rebid the project. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *I -494 AND 169 PURCHASE OF LAND COMPLETED By memorandum dated June 3, 1991, Planner Larsen advised that on May 29, 1991, the City of Edina closed and took title to the 15 acre property at the northeast,quadrant of I- 494/169 for a purchase price of $320,000.00 as previously authorized by the Council. FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED FOR'STREET IMPROVE!!EN'P NO. BA -294 (WOODDALE AV) AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -54 (DEWEY HILL ROAD): HEARING DATE SET FOR 6117/91 Engineer Hoffman informed the Council that the City has received two petitions; one for street surfacing with concrete curb and gutter and the other for sidewalk. Locations and estimated cost for the improvements are as follows: IMPROVEMENT NO. LOCATION ESTIMATED COST BA -294 Wooddale Av from W. 70th St to $97,175.68 (Street Belvidere Ln; West Shore Dr from Surfacing) W. 70th St to Dunham Dr; and Andover Rd from Wooddale Av to West, Shore Dr S -54 Dewey Hill Rd - Cahill Rd to $22,512.00 (Sidewalk) Delaney Blvd (South Side) The proposed projects have been reviewed and are considered feasible. Staff would ,recommend hearing date of June 17, 1991. Funding for BA -294 would be from proposed assessment and funding for S -54 would be from state aid funds. Engineer Hoffman explained that the petition requested sidewalk on the north side of Dewey Hill Road. Because there is a existing park path, staff would recommend sidewalk construction on the south side of Dewey Hill Road. Member Rice introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR.PDBLIC HEARING ON STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -294 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed Street Surfacing and Sidewalk described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, June 17, 1991, at 7:00 P.H. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB b GUTTF.B IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -294 WOODDALE AVE. FROM W. 70TH ST. TO BELVIDERE LN; WEST SHORE DR. FROM W. 70TH ST. TO DUNHAM DR; AND ANDOVER RD. FROM WOODDALS AVE. TO WEST SHORE DR. The Edina, City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday,.June 17, 1991, at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -294 ESTIMATED COST Wooddale Ave. from W. 70th St. to $97,175.68 Belvidere Ln; West Shore Dr. from W. 70th St. to Dunham Dr; and Andover Rd. from Wooddale Ave. to West Shore Dr. The area.proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvements includes: Lots 3 thru 5, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 3, Blk. 2, Lots 1, 2 b 4, Blk. 3, Lots 1 thru 5, Blk. 5, South Garden Estates 2nd Addition; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Lot 4 thru 9, Blk. 1, Lots 4 thru 10, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 79 Blk. 3, and Lot 6, Blk. 4, South Garden Estates; Lots 18 thru 21, Blk. 8, and Lots 1 thru 6, Blk. 9, South Garden Estates 3rd Addition. These properties are proposed to be assessed at $23.90 per lineal foot. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT S -54 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed Sidewalk described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, June 17, 1991, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. ' 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONCRETE SIDEWALK MPROVEMENT NO. S -54 DEWEY HILL RD. FROM CAHILL RD. TO DELANEY BLVD..(S. SIDE) The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17, 1991, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: IMPROVEMENT S -54 DEWEY HILL RD. - Cahill Rd. to Delaney Blvd. (S. Side) CONCRETE SIDEWALK ESTIMATED COST IMPROVEMENT S -54 $22,512.00 The project is proposed to be funded by State Aid funds. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN AT INTERLACHEN BLVD/VERNON AV APPROVED Engineer Hoffman reported that Hennepin County has submitted a set of plans for traffic control signal improvement at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and ,Vernon Avenue. The County has asked for a resolution from the Council approving the plans and providing enforcement for the prohibition of on- street parking. The signal will be installed at no cost to the City. Staff has reviewed the plans and would recommend adoption of thr resolution as requested. Member Rice- introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8729 showing proposed traffic control signal installation at the intersection of County State Aid Highway No. 20 and County State Aid Highway No. 158 within the limits of the City, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved and that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on- street parking on those portions of said Project No. 8729 within its corporate limits. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve issuance of Club On Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX DISCUSSED: CONTINUED TO 6/10191 Manager Rosland informed the Council that the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners has asked that city councils express their preference on the local option sales tax (passed by the 1991 state legislature) and forward a resolution to the County Board by June 11, 1991. The County must approve or reject the one -half cent sales-tax by July 1, 1991, in order for it to take effect on January 1, 1992. Under the law, an increase in the state sales tax rate of one -half percent automatically goes into effect July 1, 1991 and automatically expires on December 31, 1991. For the period after December 31, 1991, the law gives each county board the option of imposing a one -half percent local sales tax in the county. No city will be eligible,to receive local government aids (LGA) if'the county or the majority of the cities within the county fail to implement the local option sales tax. If the county decides not to impose the local option .sales tax for any year, the city, county and special taxing district governments within the county will not receive payment of state aids in the following year for: Homestead -and agricultural credit aid (HACA) Disparity reduction aid and attached machinery aid Homestead and agricultural credit guarantee Supplemental homestead credit Disparity reduction credit 25 percent of the base aid for county human service programs Local government aid and equalization aid If LGA to a city or county, or the aid for human service programs and the attached machinery aid to a county is reduced or eliminated because a county board decides not to impose the local option sales tax, counties and cities are authorized to increase their levy limits to make up for the loss of these aids. The loss of the other aids and credits listed is automatically made up through higher property taxes. There was discussion on how this would eventually affect real estate taxes, whether Edina would get any money back from the local sales tax, and how it would affect human service programs. It was the consensus of the Council that they would need additional information on these issues before they could make a decision. Manager Rosland said he would try to get additional information and this item would be on the agenda for the Special Council Meeting scheduled for June 10, 1991. SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNING OFFICE ORGANIZATIONAL PLAN DISCUSSED Member Smith directed the Council's attention to the packet information on the South Hennepin Regional Planning Office Organizational Plan which has been developed. The plan has been reviewed by the Edina Human Relations Commission who have endorsed the concept. On June 5 Commissioners Keefe and Johnson, and Mike Weber will meet to respond to a presentation of the Plan. It is hoped that there will be a positive response from-the County so that the Plan can be formally presented to the four city councils for approval and implementation. He asked the Council Members to review the Plan so that when it is formally brought to the Council at the budget hearings they will be prepared to discuss and act on it. Member Rice asked for information on how someone in need would work through the system. REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMUS TO EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVED Manager Rosland advised that the Edina School District reconditioned the five tennis courts at the Edina Community Center for a cost of $54,000. This has been discussed in the past with the Council and there was general discussion at the joint School Board /Council Meeting several weeks ago. Staff would recommend to take these projects as they come on a one -at -a -time basis. The City does use these tennis courts in the summer for its tennis instruction program, and the public uses the courts throughout the tennis - playing year. The School District had previously asked for rebate of excess tax increments attributable to the District's 1988 referendum. The rebate for 1991 would be approximately $20,000 and would come only from the Grandview Tax Increment District. Attorney Erickson advised that the statute on rebate of excess tax increments is unclear as to whether, if the City gives a partial rebate, the District can take all of the increment generated by the District's tax levy or if the City gives a rebate for one year the District can require the rebate for the full period of the referendum. If the Council wishes to make the rebate, City approval should be conditioned on the School Board's agreeing in its resolution for approval that the 0 payment by the City is only for $20,000 and only for 1991, and that the payment does not obligate the City to pay'any more than $20,OOO-or for any years other than 1991. Further, it should be designated as a general rebate and the funds should not be limited for the purpose of the tennis courts. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to adoption of a resolution by the Edina School Board approving and agreeing to accept the payment by the City of $20,000 only, and only for the year 1991, and acknowledging that such time and dollar limits are valid and permitted and that City has no payment obligation beyond the amount and for the year stated: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, does hereby approve payment of rebate of excess tax increments in the amount of $20,000.00 -from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District for the year 1991 to Independent School District Ho. 273. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID Motion -was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 06/03/91 and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $264,363.85, Communications $179.30, Art Center $10,672.57, Capital Fund $1,211.72, Swimming Pool Fund $445.00, Golf Course Fund $16,583.53, Recreation Center Fund $5,181,62, Gun Range Fund $1,107.57, Edinborough Park $36,704.25, Utility Fund $248,608.70, Storm Sewer Utility $2,023.03, Liquor Dispensary Fund $4,655.26, Construction Fund $6,216.40, TOTAL $597,952.80. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no.further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 10, 1991 A special meeting of the Edina City Council was held on June 10, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of discussing and considering action on: 1) Local Option Sales Tax, and 2) Grandview Redevelopment Area. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX DISCUSSED: CONTINUED TO 06/17/91 Manager Rosland recalled that the local option sales tax had been discussed at the June 3,. 1991, meeting and the Council had asked for additional information. He presented the following facts - relating to the subject: - 1989 sales tax collected from businesses in Edina: $29.3 million - Estimated one -half cent sales tax: $2.4 million from City of Edina of which approximately 50% would be paid by Edina residents - Loss to Hennepin County if the one -half cent sales tax is not approved: $29.2 million - Edina's share if the County was to replace loss by levy: $2.5 million - In 1992, City of Edina comes back on formula for HACA in the amount of $242,548 - In 1993, HACA is raised to $844,076 Mayor Richards said the Council had three options: 1) Do nothing, 2) Adopt a resolution in opposition, or 3) Adopt a resolution of approval. He said he would not support any kind of resolution that would give a signal to raise taxes. Instead, the County should be looking at cutting spending. Member Kelly commented that she would favor the one -half cent sales tax because, philosophically, she believed the budget should not be funded from property taxes Alone which are at the limit. Further, that Edina residents will be losers if the County cuts services. Member Paulus, said she was concerned that none of the Edina retailers had contacted the Council or staff about the sales tax increase. Member Rice said he was confused about how this would affect Edina, but that if taxes have to be raised he would just as soon see it come from the sales tax. Member Smith asked what programs would get cut by the County. Manager Rosland said that he had met with Commissioners Keefe and Johnson who had agreed that this was poor legislation. At the present time no programs are proposed to be cut. However, it the County does not vote for the one -half cent sales tax and does not cut any programs, the.County will have to levy for what they will lose. After further discussion on how this would impact the citizens of Edina, Member Smith made a motion that a resolution be drafted for Council action on June 17, 1991, urging the Hennepin County Board to not adopt the one -half cent sales tax because no projections have been made regarding the impact of program cuts if not adopted, and because of the uncertainty of the impact on the residents of Edina. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GRANDVIEV AREA DISCUSSED Mayor Richards referred to background information provided by Gordon Hughes,,HRA Director, in his memorandum of June 3, 1991, giving a chronology of events from April, 1984 to the present time regarding the Grandview Redevelopment Area. He observed that staff has continued to receive requests from various people, including developers, who have asked what the City intends to do with the Grandview area. Mayor Richards indicated that, in order to give direction to staff, this meeting has been called to discuss and develop Council policy regarding response to proposals for redevelopment of the subject area. Issues for discussion included the following: 1) Land Use - Should the land use designations in Grandview be changed? Presently the Kunz /Lewis property is zoned Industrial; the Comprehensive Plan shows the property as Industrial; and the Grandview Redevelopment Plan shows the property as Multi- Residential. 2) Public Financial Participation - What role should the City play in private property redevelopment at Grandview? The City has completed these initial public improvements in the area: Link Road reconstruction and signalization Closure of Vernon /Edina /Sherwood intersection Consolidation of Jerry's /Norwest Bank/Union Oil access Vacation of Summit Avenue Demolition of Public Works garage and construction of new Parking Ramp /Public Works garage Future public improvements depend largely upon future private redevelopment and would include: Upgrade of Interlachen/Vernon intersection and widening of bridge over railroad tracks Relocation of Arcadia Avenue /50th Street through Regis property The principal private redevelopment issue at present continues to be the redevelopment of Kunz /Lewis, Wave Car Wash and School Bus Garage properties. If Regis relocates, there could be a similar redevelopment interest for that site. Alternatives for public participation at Grandview were also reviewed and considered as follows: 1. Acquire land without immediate resale opportunity and issue a request for proposals to development community. 2. Acquire land and write down cost for immediate resale to a known developer for commercial development pursuant to a negotiated development agreement. 3. Acquire land and write down cost for immediate resale to known developer for residential development pursuant to a negotiated development agreement. 4. Provide subsidy for School Bus Garage relocation. 5. Undertake and fund by way of Tax Increment Financing all offsite /utility work in area. 6. Prepare illustrative development plan for area which would schematically show a hypothetical development of the majority properties. 7. Unilateral rezoning of properties. 8. Traditional role (react to development proposals /rezoning requests). Following considerable discussion and debating of these issues and alternatives, the Council Members agreed on the following concerning the Grandview area: 1. To review and consider potential public uses calling for public participation, exclusive of the School property. i) To be pro- active if a public use can be identified. ii) If a public use cannot be identified, to let the property redevelop el in the traditional sense with no public financial participation. 2. Review the regulatory tools that are currently in place that would control what happens in the Grandview area. 3. Eliminate any inconsistency as to existing zoning /land use. To consider any type of land use that may be proposed (i.e. commercial, industrial, residential or retail) with no public financial assistance. Staff was directed to prepare reports on the above items for consideration by the Council at an upcoming regular Council Meeting. Mayor Richards declared the special meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. City Clerk r, O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 17 June, 1991 Subject: Public Hearing Curb & Gutter with Street Overlay Wooddale Ave. from W. 70th St. to Belvidere Ln; West Shore Dr. from W. 70th -St. to Dunham Dr; and Andover Rd. from Wooddale Ave. to West Shore Dr. Recommendation: Agenda Item # lI . A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑l. Ordinance ❑ Discussion Conduct public hearing to determine whether proposed project should be advanced to plans and specifications for bid purposes which allows better assessment analysis. Info/Background- The City received a petition from residents living in the general area of West 70th Street and West Shore Drive south of West 70th Street (see attached map). The petition was to provide curb and gutter with a bituminous overlay on the existing street. The attached map, we believe, provides a picture of those who supported the idea of determining the feasibility of the project, and then a second petition which indicates non - support after receiving the notice of public hearing. The three streets involved are West Shore'Drive from West 70th Street to Dunham Drive, Andover Road from West Shore Drive to Wooddale Avenue, and Wooddale Avenue from West 70th Street to Belvidere Lane. Staff would point out that except for two homes on the West Shore and Dunham Drive intersection, no support exists for a project on West Shore north to Belvidere Lane. On the balance of the streets, the results are split nearly on a 50 -50 basis. The proposed project (see attached public hearing notice) is feasible and consistent with the overall public works goal of curb and gutter which provides a positive edge for drainage and helps prevent sod damage during snow plowing. Report /Recommendation Public Hearing - Curb & Gutter with Street Overlay 17 June, 1991 Page Two If approved, the proposed project is planned for construction in 1991 with the assessment to be in 1992 and recommended to be spread over ten years. The assessment ranges from approximately $2,000.00 to $3,000.00 per lot depending on lot size. Corner lots have frontage footage and sideyard footage so that the assessment runs higher. The City policy is to assess full front footage and 1/3 the sideyard footage. The staff recommendation is conduct the public hearing to determine whether the neighbors think this is a reasonable project. Several of the concerns voiced involved the cost estimate on a per assessable foot basis. If this is the largest single concern, then the Council may wish to go to bids to better determine the assessment rate. It appears that a twenty dollar per assessment foot was an acceptable figure, whereas twenty -five dollars per foot was not. 0 m l0 =1■■■l�iiw�n� ];�i 7rylm LU P J Vp Z rrl . ii m �ffam Mellon son �IIIIIIU��nu. mgi CITY OF EDI NA ;801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 X12- 927 -8861 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER WITH BITUMINOUS STREET OVER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -294 WOODDALE AVENUE FROM W. 70TH STREET TO BELVIDERE LANE* WEST —SHORE DRIVE FROM W 70TH STREET TO DUNHAM DRIVE• ANDOVER ROAD FROM WOODDALE AVENUE TO WEST SHORE DRIVE The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the "authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated as set forth below: STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT N0, BA -294 ESTIMATED COST Wooddale Ave. from W. 70th St. to Belvidere Ln.; West Shore Dr. from $ 97,175.68 W. 70th St. to Dunham Dr.; Andover Rd. from Wooddale Ave. to West Shore Dr. The total estimated cost for this proposed project is $97,175.68. The properties are proposed to be assessed at an estimated cost of $25.01 per assessable foot. Sideyards are assessed at a rate of 1/3 the length of the assessable footage. These proposed assessments would be divided over a ten -year period with in- terest accumulating on the unpaid balance. This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from property owners requesting curb and gutter with bituminous overlay to be constructed on the above listed streets (see attached map). The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvements includes: Lots.3 thru 5, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 3, Blk. 2, Lots 1, 2 & 4, Blk. 3, Lots 1 thru 5, Blk. 5, South Garden Estates 2nd Addition; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Lots 4 thru 9, Blk. 1, Lots 4 thru 10, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 7, Blk. 3, and Lot 6, Blk. 4, South Garden Estates; Lots 18 thru '21, Blk. 8, and Lots 1 thru 6, Blk. 9,, South Garden Estates 3rd Addition. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be bene- fited by the improvement. The proposed project would be constructed in 1991. (OVER) Notice of Public Hearing Concrete Curb & Gutter With Bituminous Street Overlay Improvement No. BA -2 -94 Page Two Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire ad- ditional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4 :30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. Francis J. Ho fman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf C L9 Z� oro ���lilirru / 9 ~ ��W7'tLt.d 7 �liL(/i 'Ole Ga.41-ZG --71 �i✓ zil— il/0- m e� 79 4Z?s�14" E VA 11 / LN M i. 1�ci c s.5 -7104 WzJ 7 7 /d 6 Ica? " Aso s kc `/ `/ 5S �. I-t 5-O g 2 700 7A(V. . 7o Gr� as 7061 Su -iv-e- Q sw / Aa Sii - '►9. Dates 6/q Gds sr Al G /v /9/ q -11- 71 iIla X3 4 -a9�4 (&j, � aloll� z4o.,t - o /1%a m e Address 711k (.*e Wyk %/ /a. Cv 44co� .Zr . Qty .' e�r,,rZe, , Da,c e G(D / 9/ 66 —A%9l rAl AAA-) .rte ,v,(� Z�l ac.d e�i,c�a rle 7104 W. Shore Drive Edina, MN - 55435 June 10,199 1 Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman, I am writing in regards to the letter we received concerning Improvement BA - 294 - "Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter." First, I would like to say that the maps showing the homeowners who signed the petition is a gross misrepresentation. We are shown as having signed this petition, and this is incorrect. We told the two neighbors who came with the petition that we were not in favor of curbs. I have talked to other neighbors who said that they did not sign the petition and yet the map shows that they did. I would like to see a copy of this petition, and I would like to see the names verified. I believe the majority of people on West Shore Drive are not in favor of curbs.. Next, I wanted to state emphatically that my wife and I are opposed to this curb /gutter-installation. I do not feel this is a wise way to spend hard earned dollars at this time. S irk ' , ; Iql ( Al John F. McGui4e June 9, 1991 Marce Deahn, City Clerk City of Edina 4301 West 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Ms. Deahn: Please refer to your notice of June 10 regard- ing curbs and gutters on West Shore Drive. I would like to go on record as saying "NO" to this project. You have me listed as signing a petition to this effect. I would like to see the petition and I will be in your office during the week of June 10 to see it. We have lived on West Shore Drive for 33 years and have gotten along without curbs and gutters. Why now? Sincerely yours, Stan Selvig 7113 West Shore Drive E�_na, Mn. 55435 q� (, - 70.0 qr '�,_ i0, X99 / 121' V/ 1a 9� 9- /a 9.? a ITV EDI NA 801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 12- 927 -8861 ADDENDUM TO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING June 10, 1991 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER WITH BITUMINOUS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT,NO. BA -294 WOODDALE AVENUE FROM W. 70TH STREET TO BELVIDERE LANE: WEST SHORE DRIVE FROM W. 70TH STREET TO DUNHAM DRIVE• ANDOVER ROAD FROM WOODDALE AVENUE TO WEST SHORE DRIVE Attached are two revised maps. The map labeled Exhibit A indicates the proposed assessment district and the map labeled Exhibit B shows those residents who signed the petition for the above project. Please disregard the map mailed to you previously. Thank you. Francis J. f ma E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf ii._ •1;1 WN r r El Imora . - ■.. wm Nogo g ■xc^w�on��w nu Lt�JJ.IJ.7yJ Cn7� A I i T--lo i i No -- t M1 C >> �S. i� R_■ r EA EXHIBIT B BA -294 - STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 3 = c 0 n ��._ UN L= Lei i 70 TH ST *lei • • , ; j r j CORNELiA- . I RE - : EL.EW SCH.E� i (p • • • • • • • • • • • • V' • PAR K r« o4 4 q T a `� ` 1 • t o� MOq IV KEY Proposed Improvement V Signed Petition for Improvement R1 AGENDA ITEM II.A "ARM BASS 4701 WW TM ST. EON& am mw FI'V 4XI-2,S' Vf x 7� Le, .,19-A,10 Z -7 Ttf E- C) .1002' 46 T7-E Pe_ L1,01-IL'o o 'mo/ ____ - -- - -- -- -- -- Caw � _ �-�,o rr?�� � e-- 14- RAM 4MI E VL T M ? UT DIN/1. M - --------------- ----- - ------------- T4 ------------ 6A� 40 -Z- -T z F, 22 1--,00 7— =-A") C4 JCL c- 1,)26 7� A. o e -7 y 0 cn ieeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II—B. From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: 17 June, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Sidewalk Hearing S -54 Y To Council Dewey Hill Road from Delaney Boulevard to Action 0 Motion Cahill Road (South Side) ❑ Resolution ❑ _, Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be a cost effective and a necessary link on the pedestrian system, approve sidewalk project on the south side of Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Boulevard. Info /Background The City Council received a petition for sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Delaney Boulevard (north side). The staff has been reviewing the City sidewalk system this winter and does not support the petition as requested. As background, the City constructed a pedestrian system thru Lewis Park to connect sidewalks on Cahill Road and Dewey'Hill Road which both tie into our walking system. The position of ten years ago was that a need did not exist to build a parallel sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road when a pathway existed approximately two hundred feet north in Lewis Park. One of the reasons was that it does cost money to maintain sidewalks and paths including snowplowing. It did not seem cost effective to have the parallel system. The petition received is from the Dewey Hill East and West owners on the south side of Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Boulevard. The existing sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road west of Delaney Boulevard is on the south side of the street and the appropriate location, if continued, should be on the south side of•the street. This walk would then service the abutting property owners in Dewey Hill East and West Estates without having to cross the street to use it. Report /Recommendation Sidewalk Hearing S -54 17 June, 1991 Page Two Staff has not received any other requests in the past ten years to construct said sidewalk and therefore, conclude the need is to serve the residents on the south side of the street. The attached notice of public hearing indicates information that the residents received and the cost estimate. Additionally, an attached letter from the residents indicates why they object to the south side of the street for sidewalk construction. Staff position is simply that sidewalks are met'to enhance pedestrian safety and clearly the south side of the street serving the adjacent residents is the better alternative. `r CITY OF EDINA =801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55421 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ^12 -927 -8861 SIDEWALK IMPROVEKENT NO. S-54 DEWEY HILL ROAD FROM CAHILL ROAD TO DELANEY BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., to hold a Public Hearing on the construction of a sidewalk on the south side of Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Delaney Boulevard. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter,429. This hearing has been called as 'a result of a petition from 113 residents in this area who would like to see Dewey Hill Road become a safer street for all pedestrians. The petition was for sidewalk on the north side of the street but staff recommendation is for the south side which is the location of sidewalk in Dewey Hill west of Delaney Boulevard.- Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The estimated construction cost of the project is $22,512.00. The cost of the project will be funded by state -aid gas tax as this is on our collector street system. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The alignment will be varied to. protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in late 1991. The description of adjacent properties where sidewalk construction will take place is as follows: Units 122 thru 125, 127 thru 140, 221 thru 240, 321 thru 340, Dewey Hill East, A Condominium Apartment Ownership No. 324 aka Lot'2, Block 1, Dewey Hill Estates; and Units 102 thru 105, 107 thru 120, 201 thru 220, 301 thru 320, Dewey Hill West, A Condominium Apartment Ownership No. 219 aka Lot 1, Block 1, Dewey Hill Estates; and Outlots A,.B, C & D. . Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this im- provement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire ad- ditional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A:M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorizy the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. Francis J. Hof&n,P./E . Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf The Honorable Mayor and City City Council Ladies and Gentlemens Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West residents are greatly disappointed and disturbed over your recent proposal and plan to locate the sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Rd. and Delaney Blvd. on the south side of the street, rather than on the north side as we requested in our petition last summer. Our objections to construction of the sidewalk on the south side of the park are based on the following factso 1. We presently have a well established sodded lawn which runs down to the curb. 2. Our automatic sprinkling system is installed in that area and would be disrupted by such construction. 3. Because of the slope of the ground, a retaining wall would have to be installed which would not be aesthetically compatible with our property and would increase our maintenance cost with the extra trimming required. 4. The project would be more expensive for the City because of the need for more extensive grading and landscaping on our side. 5. Our trees are more numerous and more mature than those in the park. Property as beautifully landscaped as ours should not be disturbed. 6. We believe that construction of the sidewalk on the-nsoeurmwn side of William Wardwell Lewis Park would serve a dual purpose to enhance the.park property as well as providing a much needed walk along Dewey Hill Road. We urge the Council to make an on -site inspection of the property involved before the publ -ic hearing on Monday. Yours very truly, i hard Reichow, President e ev Hi 14, East ident West June 12, 1991 I We, the residents of Dewey Hill, East.and Dewey Hill West do hereby %uppept th@ 118 @3tia" of our r @ §P @etive Boards of Directors 4% Vli @1F i@tt@F A8 tai@ tgiA@ rMV @ @unci 1 dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. /0 �a3 Wag the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support" position of our respective Boards of Directors expr se _-�i their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 199 , r� n e to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey H oad b t wean Cah ' 1 Road an , Delaney Blvd. ----------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- ec� CZIA I/IY. 0 �3y /3 We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby 'support the position of our respective Boards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 1E, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hil�Road betty Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. - - r `1 '���- - - - - -- 1� , A We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Boards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- G' _____________________________ ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ i We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Boards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 19919 in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road bet "en Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. --- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- �--- � - - - - - -- _a --------------------- - - - - -- - -- -- -=3y ----------------------------- ---- /-/I- =--- - - - - -= Id- -- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------- -- - - -- ----------------------------- --------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- -------------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- -------------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------ - - - - -- We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Boards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. Q?W)-012 -4 A i ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby @4lpp8rt th@ 08 %it , On Of @dr r @gp@@tive Boards of Directors @NPP @ @ @ @d in th @ip I @tct @r- t8 th@ €ginvi re}tcy C!@uncil dated ,rune 12, 19919 in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support he position of our respective Boards of Directors expr se i their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 199 , ' r f en a to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey H oa b t we n Cahi-I-I? Road ano., Delaney Blvd. X03 coq I wv -w We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Hoards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey ,;-" SAM 1 / Delaney Blvd. We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Hoards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Roa betty en Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. - - - - -�2 - ----------------------------- - -- G - -- - 3 ----------------------------- - - - -- ----- - - - - -� ----------------------------- -- -'-= =� ----------------------------- __ _3 _____________________________ -01/1 ---------- -- ----------------------------- ------ -------------------------- ----------------------------- __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ _ _______________________________ ______________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ __ _______________________________ _____________________________ --------------------------------- ----------------------------- __ _______________________________ _____________________________ _ _______________________________ _____________________________ _ _______________________________ ______________________________ _ _______________________________ ______________________________ _ _______________________________ ______________________________ -------------------------------- ------------------------------ _ _______________________________ ______________________________ 5-6 p"( Djvwc= K N i L z W r-s r) P, G 6 3 We, the residents of Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West do hereby support the position of our respective Boards of Directors expressed in their letter to the Edina City Council dated June 12, 1991, in reference to the proposed sidewalk improvement on Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Blvd. > /� ,- - - - - -- --� - -- -- ,, - - - - - -- - - -- -- -L -------------------- tV rr. oe�_� O \yCiRa�nu��`9� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # I I A From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent ❑ Information Only'" Date: JUNE 17, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: C -91 -2, CONDITIONAL El To Council USE PERMIT, ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH, Action ❑ Motion 6820 ST_. PATRICK'S ❑Resolution LANE. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to: 1. Connection of the on -site storm sewer pipe to the public system in St. Patrick's Lane. Info /Background The Church has agreed to connect their storm water drain to the public system. In addition, representatives of the church indicated at the'Planning Commission meeting that they intended to re -roof the building and redirect additional run off to the north. a �i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY.DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 29, 1991, 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman,.G. Johnson, R. Hale, D. Faust, L. Johnson, H. McClelland, J. Palmer, V. Shaw, C, Ingwalson . MEMBERS ABSENT: G. Workinger I. NEW BUSINESS: C -91 -7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ST. PATRICKS CHURCH 6820 ST. PATRICK LANE REQUEST: BUILDING EXPANSION Byron, N. D. Runyan, Mr. Larsen informed the Commission St. Patricks Church has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new entry -drop off on the north side of the existing church and several small additions to the office classroom wing of the church. In addition new driveways will be constructed from Valley View Road to serve the new entry. The proposed additions will not add to the seating capacity of the church and will not add to parking demand. Parking is proposed to remain a it is today. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note the only significant public issue is how storm water from the site is presently handled. Currently roof drainage is collected in a single 12 inch pipe which discharges on the surface in the south central portion of the site and runs down a steep ravine into the rear yard of homes on Scotia Drive. Staff has asked the church tore- direct this run off directly into the storm sewer system. The church has agreed to' connect the on -site system to the catch basin in the cul -de -sac of St. Patricks Lane. The City's Engineering Department has approved this solution. Mr. Larsen added in addition when the church is re- roofed in the near future much of the run -off will be directed north to existing storm sewers. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The additions will not create additional traffic or parking demands. The existing storm water problem will be corrected. Mr. Larsen said approval should be conditioned on the connection of on -site storm water pipe to public storm sewer systems in St. Patricks Lane. Mr.- Tideman, was present representing St. Patricks Church. Commissioner McClelland questioned Mr. Hoffman when the church completes the roof will the drainage solution submitted depicting the storm water running into the storm sewer on Valley View Road be sufficient. Mr. Hoffman explained the proposed drainage system for the site is two -fold, it will eliminate water from running off down the hill onto single family homes by connecting with the storm sewer on St. Patricks Lane, and the new system after the re- roofing will connect with the storm sewer system on Valley View Road. This solution would work for the proposed additions and re- roofing. Commissioner McClelland asked church representatives if they entertained the idea of "skimming" in the parking areas. Mr. Tideman said they have not considered that option. Commissioner Shaw questioned the time frame on the re- roofing of the church. Mr. Tideman said plans are to re -roof church in late fall. Chairman Johnson observed that the proposal depicts two new-curb cuts in close proximity to Valley View Road, and questioned if this creates a traffic problem. Mr. Larsen responded on the staff level the proposed curb cuts were not viewed as a potential traffic problem. Mr. Larsen went on to add that in his opinion more curb cuts would assist with orderly traffic flow. A discussion ensued on the proposed curb cuts and direction of traffic flow. Commissioner L. Johnson move approval. Commissioner Hale subject to staff conditions. the Commission would accept church to add "skimmers" to Johnson said this issue will that is their jurisdiction. 91 -4 PRE JYLAND PROPERTY ADDRESS: 70,00 Mr. Larsen presented h' is a developed sin The existing h oc lot. The subdivi cons new publ i ubdivision. Al d to recommend Conditional Use Permit seconded the motion adding approval is Commissioner McClelland questioned if the extra addition of requiring the their parking areas. Commissioner L. be heard by the Watershed District and All voted aye; motion carried. Y PLAT APPROVAL, LOT 2, BLOCK 1, ELOPMENT CORPORA VIEW r report noting the subject property lot approximately 4.4 acres in size. l in the west - central portion of the isuggests removing the existing home, reet cul -de -sac which would serve a the new home sites would have access 0 o4'*1F'A-Wd1; Utj:,,k �1- 01 1A 11 h d to] k' U lX11 , [CUfj=Iar±TE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND.PLANNING COMMISSION STAPP REPORT MAY 29,1991 C -91 -2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ST. PATRICRS CHURCH 6820 ST. PATRICK LANE .REQUEST: BUILDING EXPANSION St. Patricks Church has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new entry -drop off on the. north side of the existing church and several small additions to the office classroom wing of the church. In addition new driveways will be constructed from Valley View Road to serve the new entry. The proposed additions will not add to the seating capacity of the church and will not add to parking demand. Parking is proposed to remain a it is today. The proposed design and materials of the addition will match and complement the existing structure. The only significant public issue is how storm water from the site is presently handled. Currently roof drainage is collected in a single 12 inch pipe which discharges on the surface in the south central portion of the site and runs down a steep ravine into the rear yard of homes on Scotia Dr. Staff has asked the church to re- direct this run off directly into the storm sewer system. The church has agreed to connect the on -site system to the catch basin in the cul -de -sac of St. Patricks Lane. The City's Engineering Department has approved this solution. In addition when the church is re- roofed in the near future much of the run -off will be directed north to existing storm sewers. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The additions will not create additional traffic or parking demands. The existing storm water problem will be corrected. Conditions: 1. Connection of on -site storm water pipe to public storm sewer systems in St. Patricks Lane. \d i�6 ® -- -® I i b, I a , r® 03 J-I �. 131 ------- }--- - - - - -- I� P I i I I iI I I I I I I I I I I I I � - I . ®4 - - - - - -- ------ - - - -76 CI ' M�IIDI RC < � 13 I � ' FL000. PLgN 'A' rq•• r•r \T19 ROAOM FINISH SCHEDULE — PLAN 'A' r+o RAH uAHe rma �.aa " "" i cw. rni tJOTE3 __ - .prlN rJwT M• T . ritli f011Y rYl/rSC IL �.wr..r. w. �-. r•/rnwr.l I.MYNAT°4r V r.w,wl N�. tT M� initi rr.w K . I N tww4 �wr +l rr. rL....w .rlr ' w°orn Iw wr/ v .0 ru•rr e•. ` IDr.l. '•.�.. ti �e.w v r.wN...a w r r r...r r. wo �• •n >. rs;.v. w w• •rvw L 0p R L rN. w v w4 RY am / 4r. wwrw i 04.172 5CH -DOLE ICEY I I.MYNAT°4r ••V +••aw.0 '•� Mi.�.GVO wpOp X .•W •l0.OGAa i•aN/ Ooea Ma NG • rtW wsui.r Ga•• W Y O v I L cc NALL TYPE4 • D, vy ® Ems ME LU C B_C ME mm 04.172 5CH -DOLE ICEY I I.MYNAT°4r ••V +••aw.0 '•� Mi.�.GVO wpOp X .•W •l0.OGAa i•aN/ Ooea Ma NG • rtW wsui.r Ga•• •�t I RIJ al {•c AR Fi- 'a 8 � !i AllA �9 I ••V . Iid W Y O v I L cc NALL TYPE4 • D, vy ® ME LU u � — 44 1 1 1-1] L] -I - -- IWEST r-LeVATiow p8� � 3 a� i C W W. O L a V/ It- 0 V L .7 c .L m U= a� W ATE ..•r.� so r(•r...\ r.•hwl•NAloft. •fr�rr�r raer. rw.s. ww.� BAST CLHVgT�QN p8� � 3 a� i C W W. O L a V/ It- 0 V L .7 c .L m U= a� W ATE I ! woctma tmd 01 17 Iuw. utNty fr- Mnm. u1 wW f—il IIY1y, 07 Iwnw utNty h� w.ttlttl.. �% I ® Ittrw ut!!ty wM Iwr tH/� /rtw. f)'� �� OS Isw utttty tt-- dw• aW- f —. ® Itsw utnty Vllw wYl Owr w1/te M1tw. 17 1�„. YINty Irw ItN. IAw Ntly y ntw W tsL ® Iiw wn .I wlttly twt nil. 10 Is.. -m-0 holy w/ f—. ii 4sw wttn / -11 { rw1 tntlttw b Wt tti. 7t1.y bltl +•aLL - yea ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE — PLAN 'P5' - ti'I - 11�IIL� -!- ��w trww, w.s�. w.� t e to a Nd. RQh� lWI� PA7t 6 �,.� .», CLG D GMC10. Dot 0 RCAG 7=. 1Cn-yD 5 Ila WS 6^ 46! r / 'J r r � t�''�. �"� 1~.Ye �� -'-�� DW GG44,000. U ti 2 D�CS Da,er. M6LM UatCJLL - D;CD MGI.FO T01LG7 r,o r.. DIC7 WCMWV TCIL.T DCD DN4Y LOHOY bail ypy{1bULG O vs w ��' �r '�W` -�° d10 Lat•t6• 3111 SOCIAL MALL ! ®a bid 40GIAL MALL ' DIts GORR10oR I P C %I6TINCa � ® fl � CHAPEL U u L%13i1NG Ie MP.GNANK?L +� ;e. , a. d 4.t � ht► Q M t 4.nw. twl4 M1 '\ . •. C M1�N A tb.•f r.l. R q O— - — fl - � j '^i•. 1.�' cTY 04�'� Ell 43 , 1 KITG.IE,N....� ' IU TGM EN I n 6CGIAL HALL u I I ------------ - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- 3- I Ell MALL t7 CT _ alt ` � 0 uu1-0 0 C.G'R41DOR I I FLOpFt PLAN 'Fb• H L •yM1 rwa SRD u Ila Mill U ti 2 - -- �! ! ®a P C %I6TINCa � ® fl � CHAPEL U u L%13i1NG Ie MP.GNANK?L +� ;e. , a. d 4.t � ht► Q M t 4.nw. twl4 M1 '\ . •. C M1�N A tb.•f r.l. R q O— - — fl - � j '^i•. 1.�' cTY 04�'� Ell 43 , 1 KITG.IE,N....� ' IU TGM EN I n 6CGIAL HALL u I I ------------ - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- 3- I Ell MALL t7 CT _ alt ` � 0 uu1-0 0 C.G'R41DOR I I FLOpFt PLAN 'Fb• H L •yM1 rwa SRD u ttttl� ltd � � 11111111. � � cc o ������ cc U ti 2 - ttttl� ltd � � 11111111. � � cc o ������ cc c1 Vila a -'fie ID'•C• r -Y) 1'A 1• - b'.O' ♦'O - :d• 1;1 i._y • ,e 4 3'r �'.0 •_� _ I I I I I � � I 4 �t\,ti sir tt'• 1 • 1� Ii! _ ® It fl Y AAVA ft wA fLAT ARU 1 I ® 5 ' , ` 1 ® �— I ® 6Uer Rc>ot t o r 1 '�` O R �,. O Q CN / TAI ^j ��M. I�ew•trt.•r� / ®^tl RI(70 I t COR0.1000. t © II 11 ® g I I 11 II _ 01 Ltew .1n1.9 uzsra .I1 ..1..9e Msl N nle. I I ® � ® U I ® I I ® ti♦w .1et1.9 Fr pttll� W eet{ Ftat tlWy. 1 ° ! b I j I Q. ® �t WW.9 eed Aa• W. Ft�. 1 ® 1'swl .1et1.9 {I.Ir &U, tw. Fa. • —_• p \ ® tetwt- .1tt1.9 \t11se ttYl 41111/. Fes. I 07 Ieewe ulna ITeI'y, I Y Tpr/. 1p ~ .aa N - m ttttw .Iet1.9 /t111tt /.11t1M te{ Vttl. 1 I I t C.S. I I, iT GLA�RooM Q teewt r.n N wuu.9 on rsd. 't gg11�� CS1" ••. I _ • _� u 10 {ttwe .l{tt.9 tIWMW Fta .a.t .tlrt /1etT. MII t 1t•/ {lrld.t H dl{ trta. I — ®1 I � ® I Ll.p \T1d f. rtlat. A I I _ • /+ore: ALL w►1..Le ow 1A...aa Tyra © _ cam_- '.I—�— 1��•, N•.SM MdraO OnlaSwroa WELL TTPG4s I CCIj m wet 0 1.•u. N I ' r til STbP.. I - ` - a EI' �,^� _ Kte• ew•.r I I Q Nu lC u to uYr1 II I ® 1 •'� ® ..�® L ®66ROOM � I ® I . t K P 4 1000. O © I I' fir _ _ err, PIP m Ttise..� — sr a / 1 law v w..' ® EX 5 sK• w ® ® O ,�Y 6Tb14GE s� gg ' O Im t1r tV g t4 +s S all G ° � e►'s+Ar f III &r1O6 K A&e rcen� � ® O Q v ®1 I. f el. © • a„a O _ _�r►..�M...e © j © I ® © 1 © I O 1 'J" © I © —_ ___ ® .© _ -1 •Y V reYwa •� .' 1• 1�IQ.7 iT _ - i . -._.. •0 w1V• 1 j� —� 1 '•O' '.p' R•_p• l '� O• 1'i __I'Ld L'•O• ILC IS O' R•O t -0' t 0• 1�•DA K'•O' :O' + U) r'LOOP, PLAN Ir" 0 1 1 -. 1 lip • r• -o m .ram fora tult+zrm (L e..wm•ew ti �.1 rl.ezlr.l i , + V L /.. y U ccC. m � W DOOR SGHEOULE a e�wsl rly E tir 1..r.t r.1w at ....1. 1 r••.'a T 4_ V ao • titi ._ 1. L all \ tla r. f_z hy- 1. eeevte s to w.nwr. L as a � rl.l• Lae p r r.... L a1a .n rn r.�e • ft- .r rzlr / L " R V by n Lwy �IOil� well t•(u+e cc" 3RD "1wTt • V 4H.o JAND kL wlpT6 t+ im ..a.... _ _ m DLZ72 SCHEDULE KEY GttiR \M Y N Ygypy "aTI.L .+ rytML da•lt...\i • SC • rcVD 10.0fAt tb.S ` gy".t r"'a AL Ke m - MmmMmMMM MIMM MMMMIMIMMEM rm M! MM 1=1MMIM - _ WIWOOW 9G HEOULE YL►IDlt U41T sme TYT'! M/dL. IEAD ,H.MO CALL S WT89 ' ' WI - r..sl♦evilw +{IerT CAI s .- CLOO-9c 7yY Em L7/AS ovtr.•t (/rmtee - .- wt MMIMMIM SWAS ItAS DVM .ta fJt Yr•4 .MO .. �- _ wD ewT w.er. uao w. +aL u eaa. Ir+ltnl+'w AO MM Im ME =��C� ®- ..�o..�� ®= mz REA IM m ® ®..� Im C.•• Im �s��■����� ® ����a��� ® I_I_I_I_I_I_I"_ Fm MIMWM © - ���� m .ram fora tult+zrm (L e..wm•ew ti �.1 rl.ezlr.l i , + V L /.. y U ccC. m � W DOOR SGHEOULE a e�wsl rly E tir 1..r.t r.1w at ....1. 1 r••.'a T 4_ V ao • titi ._ 1. L all \ tla r. f_z hy- 1. eeevte s to w.nwr. L as a � rl.l• Lae p r r.... L a1a .n rn r.�e • ft- .r rzlr / L " R V by n Lwy �IOil� well t•(u+e cc" 3RD "1wTt • V 4H.o JAND kL wlpT6 t+ _ _ DLZ72 SCHEDULE KEY GttiR \M Y N Ygypy "aTI.L .+ rytML da•lt...\i • SC • rcVD 10.0fAt tb.S ` gy".t r"'a AL Ke - _ WIWOOW 9G HEOULE YL►IDlt U41T sme TYT'! M/dL. IEAD ,H.MO CALL S WT89 ' ' WI - r..sl♦evilw +{IerT CAI s .- CLOO-9c 7yY L7/AS ovtr.•t (/rmtee - .- wt 4 w O.Mr.. CLAD SWAS ItAS DVM .ta fJt Yr•4 .MO .. �- _ wD ewT w.er. uao w. +aL u eaa. Ir+ltnl+'w AO weepr eLevAnoN c, O EAST ELEVATION 'C' eou-rH &i-evwrior4 (D 0 o o Q) P. "OLrrk eLFVA7rlCP4 'c' 4 woFLrw ELEVATION W 4 WF-e-r ELEVATION 'C.' MULDI"G -ber-Tjor4 e r_wCjjz ROOM • N ----- ---------------- AUIL-nINC-1 -M—ION 12 OFF 7 ;i4 ------ 'f' f5U1Lr;PlF-JQ 6e-r-TIQP-4 CD LIY*4-rFkY L-OfSfbr EA-crr F-Levwnom 'FS' C LOfbPJY 4 CHOIR) MV OUILOINC. Seg-rioN Q NQptr-F&y 14 66AL-DIWI eCQ.'rlC2W e ?4UK66Ft-Y Zt-ATAY ui W- 0 CL ca 4i U) %P- 0 LU ieCTION G ENTRY VAL)P-TW COILING s S I A S o e4 >' OI ay REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • ���RPOM•vO • :due To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: JUNE 17, 1991 Subject: S -91 -4 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, VENTANA JYLAND ADDN. LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MUIR WOODS. Agenda Item # III- B_ Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2.- Developers Agreement 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Reduction of Street Grade to 7% Maximum. 5. A 40 ft. wide conservation easement along Valley View Road. Info /Background: The attached full -scale plans represent the developers response to the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Road grade has been reduced to 7% as recommended by the Commission. The original proposal included sections of the street at 8% and 10% grades. The City Engineer recommends a maximum street grade of 7 %. The proponents have submitted an alternate plan with an 8% maximum grade. This plan would allow a reduction in the height of some retaining walls, a cul-de-sac which would be relatively flat, and would provide a higher elevation for the home to be developed for Lot 22. Other changes are: 1. The plat name has been changed from Ventana Jyland Addition to Jyland Whitney Addition.- Lot numbers remain the same. 2. The neighborhood lot size calculations have been reviewed by staff resulting in changes to the lot depth on three lots. The median lot depth is now 152.5 feet, down from 165 feet. Other median sizes remain as originally calculated. Originally Lot 17 required a lot depth variance. However, minor adjustments to the lot and the corrected neighborhood median depth result in elimination of this variance. Lot 17 has a depth of 156 feet and the median depth .is 152.5 feet. All lots in the proposed subdivision now exceed all medians for the surrounding 500 foot neighborhood. 3. The developers have submitted a site distance analysis and a storm water analysis. These reports have been reviewed by Fran Hoffman. He concurs with the findings of each analysis. Also attached to this 'report are 8 1/2 X 11 copies of the originally submitted preliminary plat. These prints are included for Council reference. Council action is requested on the revised plat. LOCATION MAP ones s _ 44VI �.v 1� S s 0.. ti pill susDivisioN NUMBER 5 -91-4 L 0 C A T 10 N 7000 VALLEY VIEW ROAD REQUEST CREATE FOUR NEW' BUILDABLE LOTS EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Commissioner Clelland questioned Mr. Hof n when church completes the of will the drainage soluti ubmitt epicting the storm wat nning into the storm sewer Valle ew Road be sufficient. Hoffman explained the pro ed age system for the site i wo -fold, it will eliminate r running off down the hill o single family homes by con with the storm sewer on St. P icks Lane, and the new syste the re- roofing will connect w the storm sewer system on V View Road. solution would rk for the proposed additi -This and re- roofing. Commissioner lelland asked church ntatives if they entertained t idea of "skimming" i king areas. Mr. Tideman said t have not considered o n. Commissioner S questioned the frame the re- roofing of the church. M Tideman said pl re to re of church in late fall. Chairman Johns observed t he proposal icts two new curb cuts in close p imity to ey View Road, a estioned if this .creates a traf proble Larsen respond on the staff level the proposed b cut a not viewed as otential traffic problem. Mr. sen on to add that in h opinion more curb cuts would.ass w' orderly traffic flow. A discussion on the proposed curb c and direction of traffic-flow. Commission ohnson moved to recommend Co tional Use Permit approval sioner Hale seconded the motio dding approval is subjec sta conditions. Commissioner McCl and questioned if the ssio ould accept the extra additi of requiring the ch to add immers" to their parking are Commissioner L. 3 S -91 -4 Ly PROPERTY ADDRESS: �\ r PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, VENTANA JYLAND ADDITION, LOT 21 BLOCK 1, MUIR WOODS, JYLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7000 VALLEY VIEW ROAD Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting the subject property is a developed single family lot approximately 4.4 acres in size. The existing house is located in the west - central portion of the 2' lot. The proposed subdivision suggests removing the existing home, constructing a new public street cul -de -sac which would serve a five lot subdivision. All of the new home sites would have access to the new street.- The five lots range in size from 27,396 square feet to 38,514 square feet in area. Mr. Larsen concluded because of the severe topography construction of the new street will cause significant impacts on the existing conditions. While staff would prefer to limit street grades to no more than 7% some compromise may be warranted to save existing vegetation and to reduce cut and fill operations necessary to construct the road. Mr. Larsen added if the questions of the impact of the road can be adequately addressed by the proponents, staff would recommend preliminary approval subject to: 1. Final P1at.Approval 2. Developers Agreement Covering All Public Improvements 3. Subdivision Dedication Richard Carlson, Jyland, Inc., Mr. Mike Gair, of McComb Frank Roos wer_e_pr_esent_to-answer Commission questions. Mr. Whitney Peyton, _ property owner was present. Interested neighbors were present. Chairman Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on other streets within the City with a similar grade as the proposed road. Mr. Larsen pointed out Warren Avenue the street staff requested the Commission to drive is at a 10% grade. He added that The Timbers has some streets that have a grade in excess of 12 %. Mr. Carlson explained to the Commission Jyland, Inc. in working with the property owners have developed a proposal they feel is sensitive to the neighborhood of Indian - Hills. Mr. Carlson said the market value of the proposed lots will be in the 300 thousand dollar range. Continuing, Mr. Carlson told the Commission it is their belief that only one access off of Valley View Road best serves the proposal. This approach creates a neighborhood feel for the new property owners. Mr.' Carlson informed Commission Members that Dr. Peper property, owner of the large piece of property west of the proposed site, has indicated at this time, that he wishes to retain his parcel as one piece. Concluding Mr. Carlson told the Commission the proposal as presented has been developed with sensitivity to the site. It has been their foremost concern to retain as many trees as possible and maintain the character of Indian Hills. Mr. Gair informed the Commission the subdivision site is 4.4 acres. The site's terrain consists of steep slopes with a knoll. The property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Peyton wish to retain the high elevation to construct a new home. The four new proposed lots will be developed with houses with rear walkouts. Mr. Gair explained that the development staff worked very closely with the Peytons to develop a project that retained the maximum amount of vegetation, 3 while creating a neighborhood for the future home owners. Mr. Gair said. he understands staff and Commission concern over the road grade, but added development staff felt the presented proposal is the best choice out of the three scenarios created for this property. Continuing, Mr. Gair explained that development staff created three scenarios for this site. One scenario had four sites with frontage on Valley View Road with an interior lot. The other scenario is similar to what .is proposed this evening, except the cul -de -sac is shortened. Mr. Gair pointed out that the southwestern swale flows toward Valley View Road. The northern edge. will have a 12 inch pipe with catch basin that will drain into the storm system. Mr. Reber, 6916 Dakota Trail, told the Commission he has a number of concerns. The first being the undeveloped large lot owned by Dr. Peper and its potential for future development. Continuing, Mr. Reber said another point of concern is the potential for immense retaining walls in,this area. He pointed out he wouldn't want to see retaining walls constructed similar to the retaining walls located at 6800 Dakota Trail. He asked the Commission to ensure that retaining walls, where needed, are constructed with adequate materials. Mr. Wood, resident of the neighborhood, told Commis.sion Members he does not want to see a development similar to Wally Irwins development across the road.. He also indicated he has a concern with drainage. He asked the Commission to ensure that drainage on the site is adequate. Mr. Daniel Spiegel, 7104 Valley View Road, told the Commission on May 11, 1991, he received a letter from the developers informing him of the request to subdivide. He attended a neighborhood meeting on May 16, 1991, sponsored by the developers. Mr. Spiegel said he has a grave concern with the damage that will befall the environment as a result of this subdivision. He pointed out the terrain of the site is very steep and comprised of dense vegetation with mature trees. He added to.the south and west of the site, near Braemar, are wetlands where animals dwell. Mr. Spiegel pointed out that this parcel also contains a deer trail and many other smaller animals will be displaced as a result of development. He noted in walking the site with Mr. Carlson-at least 55% of the vegetation will be destroyed. This destruction will impact the animals and the character of the area, and could also create drainage problems. Mr. Spiegel concluded that any development allowed within this area must be sensitive to the character of Muir Woods, which is an area of dense vegetation and larger lots. He noted averages and medians do not really tell what is going on within this neighborhood, you have to take the time to really look at it, which he believes Commission Members have done. The homes on the north side of Valley View are very different than the homes in close proximity to the proposed site. 4 Mary Carey 6908 Dakota Trail, observed that - Indian Hills and Muir Woods are very unique area within the City of Edina. She asked the Commission to consider the question on "how much development is too much, and at what point does development ruin a neighborhood ". She concluded that this could be the point. An unidentified women residing on Comanche Court told the Commission she loves the woods and animals and the uniqueness of the neighborhood. She explained that that is the reason she chose to live in the area. She said she believes the Commission when considering this proposal should only consider the lots within the Muir Woods plat and not the smaller lots farther away. She concluded that maintaining the character of the wooded areas of Indian Hills is very important and this proposal would result in a negative impact for -the area. Commissioner L. Johnson said in viewing "the plans - he observed limits of site disturbance and questioned Mr. Carlson on this. Mr. Carlson in response to concerns raised by residents, and Commissioner Johnson's question on site disturbance,_ with _graphics explained the amount of vegetation that would be dis_turbed and removed as a result of this proposal. He pointed out with the presented proposal 45% of the vegetation will be retained. Mr. Carlson in addressing the question of the retaining walls said they will be constructed with boulders and placed behind the 50 foot right -of -way. Continuing Mr. Carlson said he will do his best to ensure that vegetation within the drip line is saved. He added the 40 foot strip conservation easement along Valley View Road will create a buffer that in the summer will make it almost impossible for passers -by to see the new houses. In referring to building pads he responded the topography will naturally* afford the best site development. Mr. Carlson asked the 'Commission to note if their plan is approved construction of the new homes will begin in the fall. The new development will also have protective covenants, mostly regarding. architectural controls. In response to the question of the Peper property Mr. Carlson -said that issue is out of his control. He concluded that by their calculations the proposed curb cut on Valley View Road has the best site lines, and will generate 48 vehicle trips per day, which will not be a problem for Valley View Road. Mr. Carlson said with sensitivity during development the animals that live on the site will remain. The deer will return. Mr. Gair in response to Mr. Woods concern regarding drainage informed the Commission that construction of the road and houses and the connecting with the storm sewer correction system will actually improve drainage on the site. He concluded the low spots on the site will be maintained as low spots for drainage, they are called in Engineering terms "dry ponds ". Commissioner L. Johnson asked when the new road is constructed is 5 there a specific house plan, and will the entire top of the knob be graded as part of initial construction. Commissioner L. Johnson said it appears to him that the garage elevation for this house is driving the slope of the street. He said he is uncomfortable with this because maintenance of this type of road may be a burden to the City. He pointed out if the elevation of the garage is dropped the street elevation could be dropped. Commissioner L. Johnson said the grades should be matched. Concluding Commissioner L. Johnson said he views this proposal and layout as good, but the roadway should be reduced to an acceptable grade. Mr. Carlson responded saying lowering the grade of the garage would create a garage with an unacceptable level for the Peytons. Commissioner Johnson said the garage should be able to be dropped to keep the road at a decent level. Mr. Carlson said extra trees will have to be removed to accomplish this. Mr. Carlson said in maintaining the elevation at 935, less trees would be destroyed and drainage will naturally occur. Mr. Peyton responded that his driveway now is at 30% and he is looking forward to a road with a 10% grade. A brief discussion ensued regarding elevations. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Hoffman how the City feels regarding the 10% grade of the proposed road, and maintenance of the road. Mr. Hoffman .explained that it does not cost the City more money to maintain a road at this grade. Mr. Hoffman said roads with a grade such as the one proposed get plowed first, but the City would rather not see roads constructed this steep if given the choice. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hoffman if the City has had problems with the roads in the Timbers plat. Mr. Hoffman . said he has not been made aware of any problems. He concluded that a road with this grade is a priority for the City. Commissioner Ingwalson also noted that be believes the conservation easement along Valley View Road is very desirable. Mr. Larsen agreed that the conservation easement is a benefit to the proposal: Commissioner Hale asked the developers if they ever considered combining lots 22 and 28. Mr. Carlson responded that that was never considered. Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion this proposal is not much different from the Ratelle proposal just heard and continued. Both proposals are in close proximity to each other and the impact on the character of Indian Hills if approved would be substantial. Commissioner McClelland said 'she believes this site has been proposed to be developed with too many lots. She told the Commission she has a problem in granting subdivision approval when the proposed subdivision requires a variance. She pointed out a lot depth variance is required'on Lot 17 that is quite substantial, 15 feet. She added she also has a serious concern with potential development to the Peper property, and in her opinion that issue N has not been adequately addressed. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland said as. presently depicted, she envisions very large houses with little to virtually non existence yards, a very steep road and destruction of too may trees and dense vegetation. She concluded as presented, she cannot support this proposal. She said she can envision three lots 'and questions if houses can even be constructed that meet setback requirements. Mr. Perkins, 6909 Dakota Trail, said at present our ordinance takes into account properties that are not impacted by this proposal. He believes this subdivision should be considered by the lots within the Muir Woods Addition not the Wally Irwin Lots across the street, or the Moccasin Lane lots. He .pointed out lot sizes would be larger if fewer lots were added in calculating the median. Concluding Mr. Perkins recommended that the conservation easement be made a formal part of the motion if the Commission recommends approval. Mr. Carlson asked the Commission to note that all proposed lots, except for Lot 17 meet and exceed all City requirements as __ __ _stipulated_by___Subdi_v_is_ion Ordinance__804_. _ _ ____ Commissioner McClelland said she feels this issue should be held over for 30 days allowing the proponent time to answer questions regarding setbacks and the potential development of the Peper property. Commissioner Faust said she agrees, adding the variance required on Lot 17 is too large. Commissioner McClelland moved to hold the meeting over until June 26, 1991. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion the proposal as presented is good and reasonable. He added he is willing to vote on the proposal this evening, but also agrees that Indian Hills is a very precious neighborhood, but if other members of the commission need more time to reflect on the proposal, carrying it over is fine with him. Commissioner Palmer said he believes he has adequate facts and good input from staff, the development team, and residents, but would be willing to reflect on the issue for a month longer. Commissioner McClelland said that what has been presented this evening in essence will create a very dramatic change to the area. She pointed out what has been proposed in actuality is a doubling of the density of.Muir Woods. She pointed out if one just views the proposal the whole Valley View "loop" section contains large lots. She added originally that portion contained only eight lots. The proposed subdivision will add an additional four. Mr. Peyton said he has worked with Dr. Peper and the development team to accomplish an excellent subdivision for this site. He added Dr. Peper supports this proposal and in speaking with the 7 n Doctor they have recognized that his property, because of the terrain could support at the most two new lots. Mr. Peyton respectively asked if the�Chairman would call the question. He added he feels he and his development team have worked very hard and long to come to this point. They would be willing to rework the road to a more acceptable grade and if possible eliminate the variance on Lot 17. Commissioner Byron said we have had the luxury this evening of an excellent public hearing before this body. He pointed out that to this point the hearing has been in process for over two hours. He said in his opinion he has been adequately informed and is willing to make an educated decision. He added as a Commission we are to remember Subdivision Ordinance 804 is a guideline for development and as a body we exercise our best judgement. Continuing, he understands the opinion that the lots within the Muir Woods plat are large, but if we are justified in focusing lot size on those lots the proposal submitted may stand up well to that test. It should be remembered that flexibility is important in coming to an educated decision. Each parcel should be considered on its merits. Mr. Byron told the Commission he supports the proposal, with the caveat that the road grade be brought down to the 7% level and the caveat that the 40 foot conservation easement be folded into the motion. Commissioner Palmer reported he would be willing to vote on the proposal this evening. Chairman Johnson reminded the Commission a motion is on the floor and has been seconded to table this issue until June 26, 1991. Commissioner Johnson called the vote. Motion failed. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions and the additional conditions that the proposed road grade be reduced to 7% and that the plat be recorded with a 40 foot conservation easement along Valley View Road. Commissioner L. Johnson seconded the motion. Commissioner Faust asked if she could amend the motion to include the condition that the variance be eliminated for Lot 17. Mr. Peyton requested that at this time without further review it may be impossible to eliminate a variance for Lot 17 and create a viable site. Commissioner Ingwalson noted that a variance is considered on its individual merits regarding hardship, there may be a hardship on this lot resulting from constructing the proposed road is the best place. He pointed out other subdivisions have been approved with variances, so at this time he has no problem in voting on a proposal that may or may not require a variance on one lot. Chairman Johnson said the condition in the motion of reducing the road grade to 7% may not be desirable, because if we require a 8 reduction in the grade and the proponents in all good faith cannot meet that requirement, we may be right back where we started from. This offers the proponents flexibility if they come back with an 7 1/2 or 8 % grade. Commissioner L. Johnson pointed out the proponents would consider the Commission's recommendation on reduction in road grade and then would go forward to the Council with their revision. If the solution reached is not quite 7% the Council will decide ' on its merits. Commissioner L. Johnson added the Commission is an advisory Board, and the Council will make the final decision. Commissioner Byron said he would not accept Commissioner Fausts _amendment_ regarding removal of the variance for Lot 17 as a condition of approval. Commissioner Faust moved to have her amendment accepted to the motion. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Chairman Johnson called the question. Motion failed., Chairman-Johnson-said-at this point the Commission is back to the original motion of approval made by Commissioner Byron. Upon roll call vote, Ayes, Byron, L. Johnson, Palmer, Ingwalson, G. Johnson Nays; McClelland, Faust, Hale, Shaw. Motion for approval carried 5 -4 vote. Se "P O 7A _TUN 12 11 :35AM MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 Nro Avenue North, Plymouth. Minnesota 55447 June 11, 1991 Mr. Francis Hoffman, Public Works Director Mr. Craig Larson, Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 SUBJECT: Jyland- Whitney Subdivision MFRA #9690 Dear Gentlemen: P.2/7 TelephOne Engineers 612/478 -6010 Planners 612/476 -8532 FAX 'Surveyors The Edina Planning Commission, on May 29, 1991, made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the Jyland Development request to subdivide approximately 4 acres located at 7000 Valley View Road. The Planning Commission action included the design of the proposed public cul -de -sac to be 7% grade, and that additional study be conducted in regard to the 15' lot depth variance request, site distances from the proposed public cul -de -sac and its intersection with Valley.View Road, and storm water design calculations. We have provided engineering documentation for the design of the proposed public cul -de -sac at road grades of 7% and 8% and have provided engineering storm water design calculations. The road grade design plans illustrate the potential of constructing the road at 7% or 8% grades. However, it has been the contention of the owner and developer, Mr. and Mrs. Peyton and Jyland Development to minimize the need to lower the elevation of the existing Peyton residence. Furthermore, lowering the slope of the proposed cul -de -sac to 7% increases the height and area of required retaining walls. The three grading plans provided to the City, illustrate the feasibility of 76,.8% and 10% road grades. and the associated retaining walls needed to retain valuable site amenities. The applicant and owner's preference is for the 8% road grade and respectfully request the City concurrance. The 8% road grade solution provides the following positive site development advantages: 2 to 4 feet less height in retaining walls adjoining the westerly property, a 27', relatively flat, area in the cul -de -sac terminus area, and maintains relatively high elevation for the new Peyton house. The storm water design and engineering calculations have been provided and reviewed by Mr. Hoffman. These materials conclude no increased surface water runoff will adversely effect adjoining properties as a result,of the proposed development. In fact, the design will provide new drainage outlots to the City storm sewer system. An Equal Opportunity Employer JUN 12 '91 11 :35AM MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS Mr. Francis Hoffman Mr. Craig Larson June 11, 1991 Page Two P.3 /7 We have had our engineer evaluate the proposed public cul -de -sac intersection with Valley View Road relative to site distance. The City indicates the speed on Valley View Road is a maximum of 30 mph; the curved section at Dakota Trail is posted 20 mph. The curve in Valley View, north of the proposed site entrance near the location of Dakota Trail, has a centerline - radius-of approximately 190'. The Minnesota Department of Highways "Road Design Manual, Design Policy and Criteria" indicates the - "horizontal stopping sight distance" for a 30 mph design speed is 200'. On June 11, 1991, we conducted a field investigation and determined the sight distance from the proposed entrance at Valley View ii a northerly direction beyond Dakota Trail is approximately 230' and in a southerly direction 340'. The controlling factor in this instance is the horizontal curve in Valley View alignment. The centerline radius of- approximately 190'— allows -sight distance in excess of 200'. The view is from the proposed entrance to the top -third of the hydrant located at 6936 Valley View Road; 280 feet. A final issue is a previously requested 15 foot lot depth variance from Ordinance 804 guidelines for Lot 17. The medium lot depth within the designated 500 foot neighborhood was determined to be 165 feet. Upon closer examination, three lot depths were determined to have been measured inaccurately. These are Lot 2, Block 1, Moccasin Valley, Lot 3. Block 1, - Charles and Ilene Wright Addition, and Lot 1, Block 3, Overholt Hills Georgia Addition. These lot depths were measured 265 feet, 175 feet and 125 feet respectively. They are in fact 130 feet, 140 feet, and 140 feet respectively. Each of these lots are corner or atypical in configuration and orientation to the public road. Our initial measurements were too conservative and resulted in an exaggerated median lot depth. These revised depths reduce the median to 152 feet. All proposed lots exceed the 152 foot depth. MJG:aju Enclosures cc: Bob Carlson, Rick Carlson, Kindest regards, Jyland Development Company Jyland Development Company SOCIATES, INC. TUN 1- '31 11:36AM MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS P. 4/7 FOAD DESIGN MANUAL JANUARY 31, lest DESIGN POLICY AND CRITERIA' 3.1,0151 Figure 3.1.05A WHEN S IS EQUAL TO, OR LESS SIGHT DISTANCE "5" THAN LENGTH OF CURVE: rt HIGHWAY M = 0 0 • Cos so I D 200 /,--(L' INSIDE LANE M \, ALSO M ■ R St •COS 28.g5S) LINE OF SIGHT AND 5 ■ 2e 135 (COS I SIGHT OBSTRUCTION S = SIGHT DISTANCE ALONG CURVE, IN FEET D ■ DEGREE OF C'.1RVATURE AT CENTER LINE OF INSIDE LANE M - DISTANCE FROM C INSIDE LAVE IN FEET V - DESIGN SPEED FOR "S" N • -M.P.H R ■ RADIUS OF C INSIDE LANE IN FEET Ioo a 6 90 40 30 30 ig W C i0 v W 6 C - W 6 W z a. ,o o.e 0.8 Q.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 DESIGN SPEED M.P.H.. SIGHT DISTANCE FEET 30 200 40 325 50 475 60 650 70 850 6 10 t5 20 28 30 3 . M ■ MIDDLE ORDINATE CENTERLINE INSIDE LANE TO SIGHT OBSTRUCTION - FEET HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Figure 3.1,05A .t �� FAMN P-0. !!III KAMM l w"A-J iriFr IVAFA= 6 10 t5 20 28 30 3 . M ■ MIDDLE ORDINATE CENTERLINE INSIDE LANE TO SIGHT OBSTRUCTION - FEET HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Figure 3.1,05A roposed .road p Iv , ZT 2 sluril \ LO ,e ir 0 +83 p 1-x-12 0'! 0 +05 0 +05 �D fJ.S AKIN L•I LOCAilm15 AIDE '� Q �+ `�+ •=�. �pppplryyllNATIFORACC1EAfF . 6' -_ •i., �.!' '\ •EACa71011 'Co.. . -- :i.: —... ' •mod' �.t'' - rIIBEnPa•DLacwsco. , ,.. �. •��' \ f- IYARNI144T C 2 Q7h+ L \ SEE ME D"W*ING CALL TEL( PRIME OONPANI� � ` 0+80" . Its'''• X77: 1 +48- ;?.f• ' oID UoHQ CARL LLPCAIIq( •''' /' • ` ►' '_ 1+87 •. IVARNIN6I SURE Ill TOCTINIACT PUBLIC DiR.11IEf E `F9RLW..,CATION Of IIIDERGRO" CABLES. . �[il I ? 5i'r.\ -� TiNTS. PIPES. ETC. rEPQE DIGGRIG — — VALLEY VIEW ROAD NOTE Al L NAT E71 NIAW (0 NAYE 7 Y" OVER _ - - - - - -� - -� --�— - -- A.i LI c f r�l \) r -V V,,mND 9t &a r I_- - / - �G 0: UJI . ` .� . ags+ - O 0+05 sluril \ LO ,e ir 0 +83 p 1-x-12 0'! 0 +05 0 +05 �D fJ.S AKIN L•I LOCAilm15 AIDE '� Q �+ `�+ •=�. �pppplryyllNATIFORACC1EAfF . 6' -_ •i., �.!' '\ •EACa71011 'Co.. . -- :i.: —... ' •mod' �.t'' - rIIBEnPa•DLacwsco. , ,.. �. •��' \ f- IYARNI144T C 2 Q7h+ L \ SEE ME D"W*ING CALL TEL( PRIME OONPANI� � ` 0+80" . Its'''• X77: 1 +48- ;?.f• ' oID UoHQ CARL LLPCAIIq( •''' /' • ` ►' '_ 1+87 •. IVARNIN6I SURE Ill TOCTINIACT PUBLIC DiR.11IEf E `F9RLW..,CATION Of IIIDERGRO" CABLES. . �[il I ? 5i'r.\ -� TiNTS. PIPES. ETC. rEPQE DIGGRIG — — VALLEY VIEW ROAD NOTE Al L NAT E71 NIAW (0 NAYE 7 Y" OVER _ - - - - - -� - -� --�— - -- A.i _ UH 12 11: 37 ari MCCUf1BS FRANK BOOS s\ , �4 t ao 3tnlvd .. s P. b.• •e \Q r �t lam' � l$0 4 \Q r �t lam' � l$0 4 LOCATION MAR Now Mel /� � • � fit? �� W-1 - NINO man w CLU SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -91 -4 L 0 C A T 10 N 7000 VALLEY VIEW ROAD REQUEST CREATE FOUR NEW BUILDABLE LOTS EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION S -91 -4 PROPERTY ADDRESS: STAFF REPORT MAY 29, 1991 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, VENTANA JYLAND ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MUIR WOODS, JYLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7000 VALLEY VIEW ROAD The subject property is a developed single family lot approximately 4.4 acres in size. The existing house is located in the west - central portion of the lot. The proposed subdivision suggests removing the existing home, constructing a new public street cul -de -sac which would serve a five lot subdivision. All of the new home sites would have access to the new street. The five lots range in size from 27,396 square feet to 38,514 square feet in area. (Lot 28 has its frontage on Valley View Road but has access provided from the new cul -de -sac. This arrangement would not be considered a "neck lot" by ordinance definition. Ordinance 804 requires that lots in a proposed subdivision meet the median lot width, lot depth, and lot area for all developed single family lots within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision. There are 60 lots within 500 feet of the subject property. Their median dimensions and areas are as follows: Median Lot Width Median Lot Depth Median Lot Area 110 Feet 165 Feet 18,815 Square Feet Dimensions of Lots in Ventana Jyland Addition At 150 feet the depth of Lot 17 falls below the neighborhood median depth of 165 feet. Thus, a 15 foot lot depth variance is requested. The other dimensions and area of this lot and all other Lot -Width Lot Depth Lot Area Lot 14 190 Feet 180 Feet 30,178 Square Feet Lot 17 250 Feet 150 Feet 28,872 Square Feet Lot 22 170 Feet 170 Feet 27,396 Square Feet Lot 28 180 Feet 170 Feet 29,236 Square Feet Lot 37 150 Feet 230 Feet 38,514 Square Feet At 150 feet the depth of Lot 17 falls below the neighborhood median depth of 165 feet. Thus, a 15 foot lot depth variance is requested. The other dimensions and area of this lot and all other lots in the proposed subdivision exceed neighborhood median sizes. The subject property is heavily wooded. The tree inventory indicates over 500 trees with a caliper dimension of six inches or greater. The site exhibits slope conditions ranging from 20% to 40% over most areas of the site. The only relatively flat area is at the crest of the hill in the vicinity of Lot 22. Impact of development on areas of steep slopes and vegetation will be caused primarily by the proposed construction of the new cul -de- sac street. The proposed public street would be 30 feet in width and would be contained within a 50 foot right of way. The right of way width, street, width and cul -de -sac radius all comply with City standards for public streets. The proposed grade of the street, however, does exceed city standards. The normal maximum acceptable -- grade is 7 %. The proposed street has sections of 8% and sections of 10% grades. Construction of the street suggests significant cut and fill operations and possibly substantial retaining walls within the public-right of way. The developers contend that the proposed street grades represent the best compromise between acceptable grades and preservation of the existing natural conditions on site. Staff has asked the developer to demonstrate the area — impacted -by cut and fill operations and also to show other alternatives which were investigated. This information should be available at the Commission meeting. Included in the submission package for preliminary plat approval is a preliminary utilities plan. The plan included storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water line layouts for the subdivision. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the plan and has asked for modifications to the proposed storm sewer and water system plans. Details would 'be worked out between preliminary and final plat approval. Recommendation: There seem to be two basic approaches to subdivision of this property. One approach would plat lots fronting along Valley View Road which would result in four possibly five lots all under direct access to Valley View Road. The other method is to construct the new public street with lot access on the new street and not Valley View Road. In my, opinion the new street offers a number of advantages: 1. All of the lots will have access on the new street and not Valley View Road. The number of curb cuts and locations will remain the same as exists today. 2. Lots 14, 28, and 37, will be rear walkouts not front walkouts. 3. The Valley View Road frontage will remain undisturbed saving the existing vegetation. 4. A sense of neighborhood within the subdivision will be created which may enhance lot value., However, because of the severe topography construction of the new street will cause significant impacts on the existing conditions. While staff would prefer to limit street grades to no more than 7% some compromise may be warranted to save existing vegetation and to reduce cut and fill operations necessary to construct the road. In order to get a feel for the proposed grades staff suggests driving Warren Avenue between 64th and 65th Streets. The grade there is 10.92% or slightly more than the 10% proposed by this plat. If the questions of the impact of the road can be adequately addressed by the proponents, staff would recommend preliminary approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement Covering All.Public Improvements 3. Subdivision Dedication 14 Vr.NTANA • \ \\` �\/ 26 VQWTXWA JO V L QQ •\ ow 17 V6NT A. �'•\ UTILITY G•SG HLMT � •••• � • 22 Vr.WTANA o ro I' ' •r 6 OUTLOT A `- --nf •s' a or fc ao'w -' OGVGLOVHGNT 6UHH.RY L07 T••UL.TION wt �•f.r.� . or .• •c .,a .r . •o r , ufn r. "o .w ° ae •r 37 VGNTANA /j va av ,. r-, a/ �ovuc•NT wt l� \ _ Rrwt.n•.a o ° "° ° "' .... NORTH \' OwNGR o-.c v- ma• ° O 11 30 aA 120 °l ,• ... -_ -.- -�q: a . -- .~f. °O w lar o SITE Q I �� -- � �o a °f �O• V °.. ,\ \\. 14 Vr.NTANA • \ \\` �\/ 26 VQWTXWA JO V L QQ •\ ow 17 V6NT A. �'•\ UTILITY G•SG HLMT � •••• � • 22 Vr.WTANA o ro I' ' •r 6 OUTLOT A `- --nf •s' a or fc ao'w -' OGVGLOVHGNT 6UHH.RY L07 T••UL.TION wt �•f.r.� . or .• •c .,a .r . •o r , ufn r. "o .w ° ae •r 37 VGNTANA /j va av ,. r-, a/ �ovuc•NT wt l� \ _ Rrwt.n•.a o ° "° ° "' .... NORTH \' OwNGR o-.c v- ma• ° O 11 30 aA 120 °l .. '.aoar— .��.. roc.... f...•r...••.«w•a. x.. PFELIHINA2Y PLAT •a ••• V6NTANA JYLAND ADDITION °RGV.RGD coa 1 � •r r+ JYLANO OGV GLOPMLNT, INL. - �• /.� _ arr,. r. r° L...- - -_ COINA, HINNR bOTt - - -r g slo • \ aP //� �� � \ \\ � \ \, � icy 1 \ 'r.�;, i. \ Ll . •� i n�� \ \ \ �37 ENT .. i\2, te/ 7, Ac bw Z I \ \ va' \.\l \ \ \\ O 11 30 40 170 FT. VRGLIHIIJARY bRpDIN(a ULAN SIOVL pNA LYSIS Z °'° ""•" VGNTANA JYLAND ADDITION �RGP.QGD FOR' JYLAND DEVGLOVMGUT• INL. '/• — �1i••r..rp.. l,rw• GDINA, H14NQ 60TH S McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth. Minnesota 55447 Teleohone Engineers 612;176 -6010 Planners 612,'176 -8532 FAX Surveyors MF.MnRAwn m TO: Mr. Craig Larsen, Planning Director Mr. Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works & Engineering FROM: Michael J. Gair, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. DATE: May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Jyland Development Preliminary Plat, Peyton Property MFRA #9690 With this memorandum, we are submitting additional drawings, responding to the issue of 8% and 10% road grades. On May 21, 1991, Mr. Rick Carlson, representing Jyland Development, and myself met to review the proposed Ventana subdivision plan." The focus of our discussion was primarly on the 8% and 10% segments of the proposed street. The four (4) drawings which accompany this memorandum are described as follows: I. Jyland Proposal II. Valley View Orientation Study III. Shortened Cul -De -Sac Study IV. Existing Conditions The Jyland Proposal and Studies II and III represent different approaches to the layout of the property. I. Jyland Proposal: This development solution is preferred by the developer, for the following reasons: A public roadway to the interior of the property provides public access and frontage to each of the proposed lots and more importantly, in the overall scheme for the area provides public access to the adjoining property to the west. This lot layout pattern provides for an interior orientation of the lots enhan cing the seclusiveness and exclusive character.of the home.sites. - This scheme will accommodate a minimum 40 -foot conservation easement along Valley View with varying depths of additional unaltered rear yard areas. This feature will avoid drastic change in the appearance of the.existing Valley View asthetics. An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Craig Larsen Mr. Francis Hoffman May 24,_1991 Page Two Orientation and siting of each home will accommodate full walk -out floor plans. The segments of 8% and 10% road grades are utilized to maintain a relatively high elevation for the new Peyton residence. Even with the 8% and 10 %, an 8 -foot reduction from the existing garage elevation will occur; however, 7% grades, the recommended maximum City- grade, would require removal-of-almost all trees on the proposed Peyton parcel and further removal of the hill. - Retaining walls will be required to accommodate the roadways, driveways and building configurations and to minimize natural terrain and tree disturbance. I --- Valley- View - Orientation- Study -: This -plan illustrates-a- layout- which- contemplates four (4) home sites, accessing directly from Valley View, with a fifth homesite where the Peyton residence currently exists and an additional sixth site on the western edge of the property, sharing common driveway access with the Peyton residence. The four.(4) lots fronting Valley View are intended to meet the requirements of Ordinance #804. - The disadvantage of this plan is the obvious drastic change in the appearance along Valley View, which we believe is unnecessary. Another disadvantage is no public road access to the westerly property. Access to the Peyton residence would be _via a private drive; however, grades would be modified to mitigate the severity of the existing driveway conditions. - The nature of the topography and slopes from Valley View to the high point of the property are such that existing slopes range from 18 -37% , causing home construction fronting on Valley View to be very difficult and requiring extensive retaining walls systems in the rear yards in an effort to maintain site amenity. We find this.solution undesirable because it achieves virtually non of the objectives of the developer or the City, which are to produce highly desirable and marketable home sites while maintaining site amenity and character. III. Shortened Cul -De -Sac Study: This layout is identical to the Jyland proposal with the obvious difference being the shortened cul -de -sac at 7% grade. - The disadvantage of this plat is that no public access is provided to properties to the west. Mr. Craig Larsen Mr. Francis Hoffman May 24, 1991 Page Three Access to three of the home sites would be over common access private driveways, with slopes in the 11% range. This would reduce property.values. Summary The Jyland Development proposal accomplishes several important objectives: 1. Public access to each home site. 2. Public access available to property to the west. 3. Interior cluster orientation enhancing exclusivity and seclusion. 4. Greater marketing advantages and property values. 5. Maintain Peyton site at highest possible elevation. 6. Minimal visual change from Valley View. 7. Perpetuate high quality home sites. 8. Expected home and lot value in the $ 700,000 to $900,000 range. 9. Will add four (4) single - family homes to the community. 0 M. B. June 15, 1991 City of Edina .Planning Department 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Public Hearing concerning Jyland Development Corporation (S -91 -4 case file) Dear Council Members: After attending the last Edina planning commission meeting(Nlay 29,1991) I came away feeling that the process was somehow flawed. Despite over two hours of discussion, much of it opposition by the community to the Jyland plan, a seemingly hasty 5 -4 commission vote 'approved' the project. Upon reflection, I find myself in support of the Feytons and their need to subdivide, but opposed to the rather aggressive Jyland plan ... even more aggressive plans were presented by Jyland at the meeting (plans clearly unacceptable to all parties) as 'rejected alternatives.' This, plan will convert a hilly, wooded area into a relatively ( loss of approximately 6010 of existing trees) open development of large, expansive homes- clearly not characteristic of the Muir Woods area. Specifically, I feel that dividing one � -acre lot into 5- 7/10 acre lots is inappropriate and will lead to an 'over- developed' appearance and a dramatic alteration to our neighborhood. Four one-acre lots would seem a logical maximum division... the only reason that the proposed. 7/10 acre lots, meet 'code' is because of previous subdivisions in the adjacent Moccasin Valley Road area. Additionally, to protect against a repeat of the 'Wally Irvine fiasco' (oversized house built right up. against their neighbors,) I strongly feel defined building plots or pads need be established such that the homes leave approximately 35 feet of woods between new structures and their lot lines ... to maintain my 'investment in privacy.' The Edina Planning Commission used the above logic in tabling the approval of the Ratelle subdivision and.I feel it need also be applied to the Jyland subdivision which is a more extensive and invasive change of the existing J landscape. Due to a last- minute meeting in Toronto, I will not be a- b- let_o_at -t -end the— June_1 -7 Counc- il_me- eting. I hope you have the wisdom to strike a comprimise between 'development' and the maintenance of our existing neighborhood identity. Since ely, Ja Ross Wood, M.D. 7 0 Valley View Road Ed' na , IMN 55439 9 2 -5071 ATTE1'TICJN NEIGHBORS: =.IMPORTANT NOTICE -`- ... As you know, two subdivisions are being proposed in the neighborhood. The Ratelle subdivision was tabled at the last Edina planning commission meeting until the next planning commission meeting June 26 at 7:30 p.m. After lengthy discussion, the Jyland subdivision was approved 54 by the planning commission. The proposal now goes before city council on June 17. The minutes from the last city planning meeting cannot be distributed until they are officially approved at the June 26 meeting. Therefore, if you are interested in reading these minutes, you must go to city hall. Please consider what impact you think either of these subdivisions might have on the entire neighborhood. Understand as concerned neighbors we are not opposed to development or to the neighbors seeking development. We ARE opposed to changes that might significantly alter the neighborhood. Your opinions are important, call Edina City Council and /or attend their meeting Monday, June 17 at 7 p.m. regarding the proposed Jyland development. For the proposed Ratelle subdivision, contact your city planning commission members and /or attend the June 26 meeting at 7:30 p.m. Thank you. Signed, The Carys The Felsens The Hinikers The Perkins The Rebers The Richards The Spiegels The Wetterlins 6908 Dakota Trail 6801 Dakota Trail 6904 Dakota Trail 6909 Dakota Trail 6916 Dakota Trail 6804 Dakota Trail 7104 Valley View 6609 Dakota Trail Q; n e Sidney Bernhard Rebers, Master Builder 3EBERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY • 3525 WEBSTER AVE. . ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 55416 • TELEPHONE 920 -6996 June 13, 1991 Robert and Mary Carey. 6908 Dakota Trail Edina, MN 55439 RE: The Public Hearing relating -to the Jyland-Development. Dear Neighbors: As a contractor of 33 years of custom homes as well as a developer of land, I look at the proposed subdivision and the information that has been afforded to the neighbors as needing some additional clarification. Supplementary conditions regarding this subdivision: I question the format, that the purpose is to create 4 new buildable - lots, as being misleading to the neighborhood and certain members of the Planning Commission. This is not a "4 new buildable lot" subdivision. This is Phase I of Phase II or Phase III of what is going to be subdividing in the future at the northwesterly point of the cul -de -sac.' I can well attest to the cost of tree removal, road building, sewer, water and streets, as that this road has been positioned for additional - usage. The proposed plat shows a 50' roadway. Retaining walls have not been adequately defined on this road or on the proposed housing sites. Due to the terrain, the actual base width definition should be shown to the public, as retaining walls cannot -- unless they are poured concrete - -be put up perpendicular. The type of material for retaining walls should be approved by the Village in that (#1) wood retaining walls will rot and necessitate replacement and ( #2) the keystone concrete block wall, such as the one on Dakota Trail, is certainly a commercial and architecturally unacceptable installation. Who, the Village or the developer, through their Homeowners Association, will be responsible for whatever walls to be approved? June 13, 1991 Robert and Mary Carey Page 2. With terrain such as this proposed development has, the developer, under- the guidance of the Planning Commission, should establish setbacks from the side lines and rear lines beyond Edina's normal requirements to protect not only the people who buy these lots but to the developers of the property so that the impact of the development will not be as devastating to the area as the 2 Wally Irvine houses on Valley View Road are. Also, having worked with architects.and'clients in the past, I can assure you that, when these people are paying top dollars for these lots, they are going to want to build, in most cases, to the absolute maximum. It would certainly be my recommendation, as one point, that the proposed road be moved to a point approximately 200' from the intersection of Dakota Trail. This eliminates the variance needed for the lot at the intersection and, from a safety standpoint, it moves the intersection farther from the curve, giving better visibility in both directions. Respectfully, s e s SR: jg ►' ii : . is L'. I ... I ... I ._ .. '1I i �,. � .•.!. ... ••tJ.< 1' y .i . • ;`..1_ •� � , � , � h ITE �.. w w t.• \ ' TTT 14 VGNTANA �f / •,, � 17 VGNTANA ` 'uran v c•4LMLMT P ,� 1, `t+•1.riy, ♦ fr \ �'• 22 VGNTANA VGNTANA \ r' \ 1 •• �` �7 :, ••\:.:.. ... L:• go y.���•> it OUTLOT A °• .. ••....,•.,r.. "'°'•• na w • o�r•.e'r- Ot11�t00►16a1T WM•Y!Y • LOT T.OUL.TIOM 1 • \ jLti i "uy • : « • r Ir • •. .°• y! -11 ft •s.P7]! JU 10- a!MW! \ «O L •�• rl w"r ~ . ••w wr•• :rr •• •• •• w rtl w• w r.ry r•MI•.Or1l•, w ••••• 1 ...... .O .... w.•.w M •Me NORTH ••.•+r ■••.•.• • �• ••p ro Yr A tl•.• rY•• A••se °sw r.. •n O w to tl ra0 07 sLt..rwL+wlr�.srr /QGLIMINAQV OL/fT ' w 1 stcr+tcs sot -' r•.�•�. -� l ...r..• •+w VGNTANA JYLANO ADDITION MANO OCVGLOVMaNT, W. .... r_ •OrNLI, MI.O•al•OT. w0 7 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL •� 4801 West SOth Street • Edina, Minnesota SS424 • (612) 92741861 CASE FILE: S-91-4 TO: PROPERTY OWNERS WITHII4 500 FEET APPLICANT: JYLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7000 VALLEY VIEW ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MUIR WOODS PURPOSE: CREATE FOUR NEW BUILDABLE LOTS DATE OF HEARING: JUNE 17, 1991 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM PLACE OF HEARING: Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West SOth Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and/or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West SOth Street Edina MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: JUNE 7, 1991 ARROW SIGN TEL No.6124344652 Jun.12.91 13:45 P.02 �f~ "AM Sign Co (612) 434.8134 10007 11 vv j. 65 N.F. Gcdar, Minnesota 55011 t COMPLETE CUSTom MAUI SIGNS & AWNINGS June 12, 1991 City of Edinal city Council Mayor 4801 W. 50th t. Minn, MM 55 24 kf:: Leisure Lanc Identification Signage Dear Sing, Wc! are writin to afipeal Lhe decision of the Variance Board. of Junc 6, 19 1, in regard to interpretation Ot the existing cign'ordinanc as it pertains to iten► 2, free standing signc in a PC -3 ton ng. Wn are asking to have our' Siyn be Classified 00 a 40 Square feet advertisement, diecallowing a 7 Squar.P Fret Architechural amenity from hp total square footage of siyilaye. We feel that he Ordinance as it is presently written can be intarprrtnd to agree with our viewpoint acid the purpose and intent of said ordinance is intended to encourage reascnahle creativity which this sign dAmonstrates. Sincerely, in Reiter Arrow Sign Y ARROW__SI.GN_ -_____ -- TEL. No- .- 6L2�3�I�IbS? -- - -Jin 12.91 -13 �I�– P -01 — -- ... - ��- • ------ ...�__.......___., ,- _— ....., - - - -•� ---- ..._.. ,fA60% Hwy. 65 /V. E. .. . Cedar, Minnesota 55011 �7MI Sign Co. I COMPLETE CUSTOM MADE SIGNS & AWNINGS 13y i D COMPANY ATE ' i yz? - -7 c.1fs' ATTENI'1UN: �ti li Y L.l( f," I,: :_ ... /`1,�r�� �1 =. L 1. WE ARE SENDING YOU PAOES, INCLUDING THIS COVER'$HEFT, IF YOU NEED A RE -SEND OF ANY PAGE OR A CONFIRMATION, PLEASE CALL-612 /434 -6134. IF WE DO NOT NEAR noM YOUl WE WILL ASSUME, EVERYTHING IS 0'.K. THANKS, HAVE A NICE UAY111 pull FAX / 612 )`434 -4652. NOTES: CSC. c /(�7� C� -(E t� L tl �1L-.� -it7[2 AQCA C1 O wL.. O - 0 2 c..J otil. i> V 't' ' Z - -- i •i IS — i w9t�A.ljr . ° ` � 01, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CRAIG G. SWANSON, CHIEF OF POLICE VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 0,000 DATE. JUNE 14, 1991 AGENDA ITEM y . A ITEM DESCRIPTION: COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE FOR EDINA PUBLIC SAFETY Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. INTEGRATED COMPUTER CONCEPTS INC. 1. 339,900 2. CANTUS CORPORATION 2. 366,266 3. MASYS CORPORATION S 446,095 4. EAI SYSTEMS, INC. 4. 458,036 5. PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS INC. 5. 476,573 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: INTEGRATED COMPUTER CONCEPTS INC. GENERAL INFORMATION: The preceding quotes are for a public safety computer and software system to replace the LOGIS system currently used by the Department. The system will be financed from three (3) sources: $145,000 -- Reserved Capital Plan -- 1988 -1991 14,900 -- Fire Department Equipment Replacement Budget -- Reserved 180,000 -- Annual Maintenance Costs (25,000 /Yr. Police -- 5,000 /Yr. Fir $339,900 /Do/, C el Signature Depa ent The Recommended bid is within budget not within budget John Wallin, Finance Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager a• 9tr7A. �l� ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis. J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 17 June, 1991 AGENDA ITEM V. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Ventilation Modifications Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See Attached Tabulation 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Snell Mechanical, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 42,165.00 This project is a repair of e:Ilisting mechanical ventilation on the.Public Works roof and improvement to the ventilation of the mechanics area. The project is funded through the Capital Plan. The recommendation for award is to the second low bid who is the lowest responsible bidder. The low bid is aware of staff recommendation and agrees with the recoumenda:.tion. Public Works Sign ty e The Recommended bid is within budget not IL Kenneth Rosland City Manages' Director r BID TABULATION CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA CONTRACT 91 -11 Improvement No. 91 -11 Public Works Ventilation Modifications Engineer's Estimate June 7, 1991 11:00 A.M. ALT. 1 BASE BID NewMech Companies, Inc. $ 22,980.00 Snell Mechanical, Inc. $ 31,525.00 Grendahl Mechanical _ $ 34,950.00 General Sheet,Metal $ 30,900.00 Pavan Mechanical $ 32,940.00 Environmental Systematics $ 37,500.00 Cool Air Mechanical $ 34,570.00 SBS Mechanical $ 38,000.00 Engineer's Estimate June 7, 1991 11:00 A.M. ALT. 1 ALT. 2 TOTAL $ 8,700.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 33,680.00 $ 9,140.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 42,165.00 $ 7,880.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 43,880.00 $ 12,324.00 $ 1,665.00 $ 44,889.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 45,720.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 1,460.00 $ 47,560.00 $ 11,230.00 $ 2,120.00 $ 47,920.00 $ 16,400.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 56,200.00 53,000.00 v Ot. �rl N` REQUEST FOR PURCHASE :.a 0.; TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j etin VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 12, 1991 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company 1. Environmental System 2 • 11odern I1 & A. C. 3. C.O. Carlson A.C. 4. Fred Vogt & Co. 5. Cronstrom H. & A.C. Senior Center Relocation RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend.the low bidder - Environmental System GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM V . C . Air Conditioning Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $53,800.00 2. $54,390.00 3 $59,350.00 4 $61,800.00 5. $66,970.00 Relocation and construction at the Communitv Center for the Edina Senior Center. Department The Recommended bid is /X\ within budget not within buy1dei Kenneth City Wallin, Hhance Director ,9l�ll: 1 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j etin VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: June 12, 1991 AGENDA ITEM v . D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Senior Center Relocation - Hallway and Door Construction Company Amount of Quote or &d 1, Environmental Systems 1. $16,500.00 2. Rak Construction 2. $19,198.00 3. Socon 3. $23,300.00 4. Falls - Nyhusmoen 4 $25,049.00 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend the low bidder - Environmental System GENERAL INFORMATION: Relocation and construction at the Community Center for the Edina Senior Center. The Recommended bid is — — within budget not withA budge Kenneth • l �c%�" C )epa ent allin, ance irector City Man ger 91Za�. `lr O e r 0. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15,000 DATE: June 10, 1991 AGENDA ITEM v . E . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of #3 tee at Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Perkins Landscape Contractors $11,821.75 2. Dave Perkins Contracting 2• $14,589.00 3." 3. 4 Kokesh Landscape 4. $13,760.00 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Perkins Landscape Contractors $11,821.75 GENERAL INFORMATION: Reconstruction of the #3 tee for the 18 holes golf course is part of a continuing improvement plan for the Braemar Golf Couse. The bid includes grading, fill, topsoil, oasis, seed, curbing. Sig ture The Recommended bid is within budget J �" 9`N A. trf. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 12, 1991 AGENDA ITEM V. F . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Handicap handrailing for Arneson Acres Museum Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Minnetonka Iron Works 1•$6,960.00 2. Johnson Wrought Iron, Inc. 2•$7,055.00 3. Loftus Ornamental Iron 3•$7,440.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Minnetonka Iron Works $6,960.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: 280 feet of handicap accessible railing on ramp at Arneson Acres Historical Museum. The railing will be installed on both sides of the ramp and will aid in wheelchair access and people using walkers. Also, additional handrailing on steps to the front door of the museum. $1,180 to be funded by the operating budget- steps handrail $5,780 . to be funded by CDBG - handicap .railing $6,960 PFA The Recommended bid is within budget �/ not Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager 4,91��1 L REQUEST FOR PURCHASE o 'TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 17 June, 1991 AGENDA ITEM v . G . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Industrial Floor Sweeper Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Industrial Floor 1. $ 22,265.00 2. Tennant 2, $ 22,619.00 3, Herc -U -Lift, Inc. 3, $ 27,272.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: Reject all bids and re -bid the equipment. GENERAL INFORMATION: Questions have been raised on the specifications used for the bid process and after consultation with the City Attorney, I would recommend rejection of bids and re -bid the equipment with a charge in specifications. Public works - Streets ign r Department The Recommended bid is �A within budget not withip'bu�;4t/ ,4n Wallin, Fin ce Director Kenneth Rosland City ��z��,� lgg� To 6� _ ❑ AM Date Time ❑ PM WHILE YOU WERE OUT M of Phone Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Operator D2- 23000S 'Bertelson 612 546-4371 612546 -5633 FAX MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE JUNE 11., 1991 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Craig Swanson Gordon Hughes Bob Sherman MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. STAFF PRESENT: Ass Ms. SECTION A Galen Honn, 5611 Dalrymple Road Chris Mower, 4911 Bruce Avenue Dan Jurgens, 4906 Bruce Avenue & Mrs. Timothy Leer, 5612 Sherwood Avenue Karen Wenaas, 5617 Sherwood Avenue Doug Johnson, Edina Community Center Doug Fincham, 6409 McCauley Circle Tom Shirley, @ Edinborough /Centennial Lakes t. Chief, Len Kleven, Edina Police Department Candy Fiedler, Engineering Department VI. B. Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Discuss parking restrictions on Sherwood Avenue, Dalrymple Road, St. Andrews Avenue and Lakeview Drive. Request by Edina Traffic Safety Committee. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reported that his department had sent a letter to residents in the neighborhood notifying them that the parking restrictions would be reviewed at this meeting and requesting their responses. Mr. Hoffman said he received responses as follows: Residents living on Sherwood Avenue from South View Lane north to Wind Road adamantly opposed any change in restrictions; residents on Dalrymple Road had a split response, the northern part of the block wanted the restrictions removed and the southern end wanted restrictions left as is; and residents from both St. Andrews Avenue and Lakeview Drive had very little response. r' TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 11, 1991 Page 2 Ms. Karen Wenaas, who resides on Sherwood Avenue requested that the parking restrictions be extended until 6:00 PM to take care of the parking problem created from people picking up their children from the daycare located at the Community Center. She also requested that there be no parking any time near the "STOP" sign on Sherwood Avenue. Mr. Leer, also from Sherwood Avenue added that he was concerned for the safety of the children in'the neighborhood and also did not want the restrictions removed. Mr. Hoffman asked him how he felt about the extension of the restriction to 6:OO.PM and Mr. Leer said this would be a more reasonable cut -off time. Mr.. Hoffman gave a brief history of the parking restrictions in the area and asked if there were any other comments from those attending. Mr. Honn, a Dalrymple-Road resident, stated that they now have 12 children on his block and he would prefer the signage be left as is. He added that if the Community Center needs more parking, they should consider adding a parking ramp. . Mr. Doug Johnson, from the Edina Community Center said he would like to keep everyone happy, that he had no preference either way regarding the signage issue. He added that there are two events he knew of which would cause parking problems, those being the graduation event and football games. Mr. Johnson also said that he knew there was some confusion as to the current signage stating NO PARKING SCHOOL DAYS, because some people knew the school was no longer there and therefore felt it was all right to park. Mrs Hughes made a four part motion as follows: .(1) Remove parking restrictions on Lakeview Drive: (2) Modify the parking restriction on Sherwood Avenue to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY. 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, and add a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" sign near the vicinity of the "STOP" sign on Sherwood Avenue: (3) Remove parking restrictions on St. Andrews Avenue: and (4) remove parking.restrictions on the west side of Dalrymple Road from 5608 Dalrymple Road north to Lakeview Drive, and modify restrictions from 5610 Dalj}Wle Road to South View. Lane, to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY. 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Ms-. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Request for "STOP" signs on southbound Post Lane and McCauley Circle. Petition received from 15 local residents. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Fincham, representing his neighborhood; made a presentation stating that he found overwhelming support from all his neighbors on McCauley Circle to install a "STOP" sign at this location. Mrs. Fuhr questioned the weed situation at the vacant lot he mentioned and Mr. Hoffman said the weeds would need to be cut and the owners of the vacant lot were in violation of an ordinance.. Mr. Swanson stated he had difficulty with 'the "STOP" sibn being placed in a secluded neighborhood, adding that there would be very low compliance and enforcement of a "STOP" sign. Ak TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 11, 1991 Page 3 Mr. Swanson made a motion recommending a "YIELD" sign be put on Post Lane southbound to reinforce State law at T- intersections with through traffic and that the owners of the lot that the owners lot comely with the Clear View ordinance. the Clear View ordinance. Ms. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (3) Request to upgrade the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road to a 4 -way "STOP ". Request received from Charles Gauck, 4460 Hunter's Ridge Road, Minnetonka. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman said he had-received letters from people who work in this area and that traffic counts taken in this area warrant the 4 -way "STOP ". Mr. Swanson said there have been five accidents at this location within the last three years. Ms. Fuhr moved that the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road- be upgraded to a 4 -way "STOP ". Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. None. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Request to upgrade the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Country Club Road to a 4 -way "STOP ". Petition received from numerous local residents. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Chris Mower, a resident on Bruce Avenue, stated that the petition he submitted includes all four neighbors at this intersection and they were in full support of upgrading it to a 4-way "STOP ". He said that the demographics of the neighborhood have changed and there are now.about 40 children, the majority of them under the age of 7 years, and combined with the speed and increased volume of cars this creates a dangerous area for children. He said that this was the first intersection where there was direct access to the Country Club district and the "STOP" signs would probably change most driver's frame of mind if they were forced to stop. Mr. Mower also said that there have been several unreported accidents in the area. Mr. Dan Jurgens, also from Bruce Avenue said that they had a lot of traffic coming from 50th Street, and Bruce Avenue gave drivers a clear shot so they would accelerate. He said the "STOP" signs would cause them to pause during this acceleration. _Mr. Swanson stated that there were no reported accidents in the last three years and.there have been no,speed surveys conducted on the street to date. Ms. Fuhr made the motion to TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 11, 1991 Page 4 change the intersection from a 2 -way to 4 -way "STOP ". Motion failed for lack of•a second. Mr. Swanson said that there are no sufficient facts to warrant the 4 -way "STOP ".. He said they should look at the speed of traffic in the area with radar surveys to have necessary facts to make a better decision. Mr. Swanson moved to review this item for one month, so that speed surveys may be made in the area. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 76th Street and Edinborough Way to a 4 -way "STOP" and improved pedestrian crossing indications to tie Centennial Lakes and Edinborough area. Continued from October, 1990 Traffic Safety Committee Meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Tom Shirley was present to represent Mr. Bill Bach from the Centennial Lakes and Edinborough area. Mr. Hoffman stated that he had some phone calls regarding a utility transformer in this vicinity which caused some traffic problems. He said that after reviewing'this' area, there doesn't appear to be a lot of pedestrian activity to warrant the request of Mr. Bach for pedestrian crossing marking at this location. Mr. Shirley said that their main objective was to see that there was a safe way to cross the road from Edinborough to get to the amphitheater located at Centennial Lakes. Mr. Swanson reported that there have been six accidents in this area, five were near the intersection. He said two failed to yield, one was a hit and run, one was a manhole which was hit', one there was a no report and one was at the driveway near Ebenezer. Mr. Hoffman agreed the area was fast and busy and suggested a "NO LEFT TURN" ban be put in the area during rush hour in the future if the auto problem demonstrates a need. There was discussion held in reference to the potential of constructing a temporary bituminous path along the south side of West 76th Street from Edinborough Way and West 76th. The pedestrian could then walk west and go under 76th Street at the bridge area to access Centennial Lakes Park. Mr. Hughes stated he did not like the idea of painting crosswalks for pedestrians. He said if they did not work well at the 50th & France area, he had his doubts as to how they would work here. He added that it would give the pedestrians false security to cross in this busy area. Mr. Hughes moved that this item be postponed until the August meeting. and that an extensive investigation be made in this area including the possibility of a blacktop path for pedestrian crossing. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 11, 1991 Page 2 Ms. Karen Wenaas, who resides on Sherwood Avenue requested that the parking restrictions be extended until 6 :00 PM to take care of the parking problem created from people picking up their children from the daycare located at the Community Center. She also requested that there be no parking any time near the "STOP" sign on Sherwood Avenue. Mr. Leer, also from Sherwood Avenue added that he was concerned for the safety of the children in the neighborhood and also did not want the restrictions removed. Mr. Hoffman asked him how he felt about the extension of the restriction to 6:00 PM and Mr. Leer said this would be a more reasonable cut -off time. Mr. Hoffman gave a brief history of the parking restrictions in the area and asked if there were any other comments from those attending. Mr. Honn, a Dalrymple Road resident, stated that they now have 12 children on his block and he would prefer the signage be left as is. He added that if the Community Center needs more parking, they should consider adding a parking .ramp. Mr. Doug Johnson, from the Edina Community Center said he would like to keep everyone-happy, that he had no preference either way regarding the signage issue. He added that there are two events he knew of which would cause parking problems, those being the graduation event and football games. Mr. Johnson also said that he knew there was some confusion as to the current signage stating NO PARKING SCHOOL DAYS, because some people knew the school was no longer there and therefore felt it was all right to park. g w ,f s,de Mr. Hu es made a four Rart motion as follows: 1 Remove barking restrictions on Lakeview Drive • 2 Modif the arkin r striction on He- Sherwood Avenue to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY 8- 0 AM to 6 :00 PM r and add a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" si near the vicini of the "STOP" si -on Sherwood Avenues 3 Remove Rarking restrictions on/St Andrews Avenue• and (4) remove parking restrictions on the west side of Dalrymple Road from 5608 Dalrymple Road north to Lakeview Drive, -and modify restrictions from 5610 Dalrymple Road to South View Lane, to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY. 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Ms. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. AMENDED 6/24191: Add - all changes pertaining to Sherwood Avenue, St. Andrews Avenue and Dalrymple Road to be made on the West side only of these streets. (2) Request for "STOP" signs on southbound Post Lane and McCauley Circle. Petition received from 15 local residents. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Fincham, representing his neighborhood, made a presentation stating that he found overwhelming support from all his neighbors on McCauley Circle to install a "STOP" sign at this location. Mrs. Fuhr questioned the weed situation at the vacant lot he mentioned and Mr. Hoffman said the weeds would need to be cut and the owners of the vacant lot were in violation of an ordinance. Mr. Swanson stated he had difficulty with the "STOP" sign being placed in a secluded neighborhood, adding that there would be very low compliance and enforcement of a "STOP" sign. A. �1 Cr • ,N�b laasBMS °O/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards and Council From: Bob Kojetin, Director . Park and Recreation Dept. Date: June 13, 1991 Subject: Centennial Lakes Park fees and charges Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI . C .1 Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance . ❑ Discussion James Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK RENTAL FEES AND CHARGES THAT ARE ATTACHED. Beth Hall SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Info /Background From the June 11, 1991 Park Board Minutes: Tom Shirley handed out two sets of rental fees. One is for the Weekend rental fees and the other one is for the Weekday rental fees. Mr. Kojetin stated that these sheets are different from the ones handed out at the last Park Board meeting. These new rates do not .include the amphitheater across the lake, or the front mall area. Originally these were talked about as being rental areas, but at this time they will not be considered as rental areas. Everything else on the sheet is the same. The weekends will probably have weddings and will be run similar to Edinborough Park in that respect. In the winter months the times could change because it would be hard to close the area for a rental group when people are still skating. Mr. Kojetin also indicated that when the library at Southdale closes down for reconstruction, there will be a lot more cars in the parking lot at City Hall. Because of this, different groups will be meeting at Centennial Lakes, Arneson Acres, and Braemar in order to avoid the parking problem that will develop at .City Hall. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 p.m. June 11, 1991 TOUR AND MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Beth Hall, Pat Vagnoni, Mac Thayer, Bill Jenkins, James Fee, Chip Sour, Paul O'Connor, Jean Rydell MEMBERS ABSENT: Andy Montgomery, Bill Lord STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Janet Canton, Tom Shirley I. TOUR The Park Board went on a tour to the following parks: 44th Street Park Sherwood Park Highlands Park Chowen Park Lake Cornelia Park Cornelia School Park THE PARK BOARD MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 8:35 P.M. II. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 14, 1991 MINUTES Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 14, 1991 MINUTES. Beth Hall SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. III. CENTENNIAL LAKES FEES AND CHARGES Tom Shirley handed out two sets of rental fees. One is for the Weekend rental fees and"the other one is for the Weekday rental fees. Mr. Kojetin stated that these sheets are different from the ones handed out at the last Park Board meeting. These new rates do not include the amphitheater across the lake, or the front mall area. Originally these were talked about as being rental areas, but at this time they will not be considered as rental areas. Everything else on the sheet is the same. The weekends will probably have weddings and will be run similar to Edinborough Park in that respect. In the winter months the times could change because it would be hard to close the area for'a rental group when people are still skating. James Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK RENTAL FEES AND CHARGES THAT ARE ATTACHED. Beth Hall SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Kojetin also indicated that when the library at Southdale closes down for reconstruction, there will be a lot more cars in the parking lot at City Hall. Because of this, different groups will be meeting at Centennial Lakes, Arneson Acres, and Braemar in order to avoid the parking problem that will develop at City Hall. IV. EDINA MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL Mr. Kojetin informed the Park Board that their recommendation on the pool did not go to the City.Council. Mr. Kojetin stated that after further discussion with the staff and after more information was received from the architect and contractor, it looks as though the pool can be still be done with the same concept, only it will be shaved down. The play structure will still be the same only not as large and the pump would also be cut in size. Mr. Kojetin stated that by going with this new design it is hoped that it will cost at least a minimum of 50% less than what was originally thought and will be closer to the recommended budget. Mr. Kojetin noted that there will be a rebidding of this project on July 10th. The time frame will hopefully remain the same, and construction will start the end of August. Mr. Christianson asked if this will come back to the Park Board for another recommendation? Mr. Kojetin stated at this point it will probably go directly to the.City Council. V. OTHER A. Annual Inspection Tour of Braemar - The annual inspection tour of Braemar will be on July 9, 1991. It will be the same set up as in the past. There will be a mailing going out within the next week. Mr. Christianson stated he hopes everyone can attend. This will be a.good chance for everyone to see what developments have occurred in the past year. It was indicated that it gets better every year. The new tee oasis looks very nice. B. Senior Center Time Line Schedule - Mr. Kojetin handed out the time frame schedule for the.Edina Senior Center. He indicated that there was a bid opening today. The bids were over a little bit, but they seemed to be satisfactory. The bids will be awarded at the City Council meeting on Monday. This first phase will only include air conditioning and the construction of the doors and hallway. Work will hopefully begin on this project in one to two weeks. The main hallway wall will be removed in December by City crews, as indicated in the time line schedule. C. Centennial Lakes Grand Opening - Mr. Christianson informed the Park Board that he recently met with Mayor Richards, Peter Jarvis, Larry Laukka Warren Beck, Boyd Stofer, Ken Rosland, Bill Bach and Bob Kojetin regarding the grand opening at Centennial Lakes. The dates for the grand opening will be June 29 and 30, 1991. The dedication is set for Saturday June 29, 1991 at around 4:00 - 4:45. This will be the official ribbon cutting ceremony. Mr. Christianson indicated that right now these people are in 4 r. I' the. process of finding someone to make a statement about the unique nature of this park, especially since it is a government and private enterprise partnership. Right now there are three people being looked at for this occasion. Mr. Christianson stated that he hopes everyone can make an attempt to attend the grand opening celebration. Mr. Kojetin stated that the laser light show has been approved by the City Council. This is scheduled for Saturday evening, June 29th at 10:00 p.m. Mr. Kojetin also stated that there will be fireworks out at Lake Cornelia Park again this year for the Fourth of July. The program will start at 8:45 p.m. and the fireworks display will begin at 9:50 p.m. This year the fireworks will be a little different. Because of various reasons the fireworks need to be a minimum of 300 ft. away from any spectators. The fireworks will be shot off at the west end of the lake. D. Braemar Golf Tournament - Mr.'Sour passed out a brochure for a Braemar Golf Tournament sponsored by the Braemar Golf Association. Mr. Sour indicated this is the first tournament of this type. It is.open to all Edina Residents. The cost is $33.00 which includes golf, dinner, drinks and awards. The date for the tournament is July 14, 1991. Mr. Christianson asked if the course has been reserved for this day. Mr. Sour was not sure what the status was. Mr. Kojetin stated that he was not aware of this tournament until now. Mr. Christianson stated that the Braemar Golf Association should have contacted someone on the staff or brought it before the Park Board. Certain procedures need to be followed for this type of an event. Mr. Fee indicated to Mr. Kojetin that he should follow up with this and let the Braemar Golf Association know they need permission before they plan something like this. The Braemar Golf Association needs to follow the rules, they cannot just do whatever they want. V. ADJOURNMENT Chip Sour MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:00 P.M. Paul O'Connor SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. W Salon "A" Salon "B" Both Salons Centrum Ter. CENTENNIAL LAKES PROPOSED RENTAL FEES Centrum Building & Adjacent Areas Weekend Evening & Sunday -Day Rental Fees City of.Edino City of Edina Edina Organizations Edina Organizations Edinborough Croups Edina Based Non —Edina Based City Boards /Comm Athletic Assoc. Non — profit School District Home Associations Resident /Business Resident Business n/c not available not available not avaivable not available not available not available n/c not available not available not available not available not available not available n/c S 15 maK 7 hours $200 max 7 hours $200 max 7 hours $200 max 7 hours $350 max 7 hours $450 max 7 how$ n/c $35 per use $35 per use $35 per use $25 per use $50 per use $75 per use *Evening Rental Period is 6:00 PM to 1:00 PM Sunday Rentals Will Not Begin Before Noon Salon "A" Salon "B ". Both Solon's Centrum Terr. Urban Moll CENTENNIAL LAKES PROPOSED RENTAL FEES Centrum Building & Adjacent Areas Weekday Rental Fees City of Edina City of Edina Edina Organizations Edina Organizations Edinborough Croups Edina Based Non —Edina Based City Boards /Comm. Athletic Assoc. Non — profit School District Home Associations Resident / Buisness Resident Buisness n/c n/c 125 per how 125 per hoer n/c 150 max 3 hours 175 max 3 hours n/c n/c 125 per how 125 per how n/c 150 max 3 hours 175 max 3 hours n/c not mailable not available not available not mailable not available not available n/c 135 per use 135 per use 135 per use 135 per use 150 per use 175 per use n/c Fee based on use Fee based on use Fee based on use Fee based on use Fee based on use Fee based on use October 9, 1990 PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT "V , Pistol 1/2 hour 1991 FEES i CHARGES $4.00 DESCRIPTION 1991 1990 1989 INCREASE TO REVENUE PARK i RECREATION 54.50 Building /hr 545.00 *Playground $10.00 $9.00 18.00 $500.00 *Aquatic Instruction $30.00 $30.00 $22.00 *T -bell $22.00 $22.00 $22.00 *Tennis Instruction 525.00 $25.00 $22.00 *Pee Yee Tennis $15.00 *Team Tennis $5,000.00 *1991 non - residents won't be allowed ART (DIRER Memberships Family $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Individual $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Class Fees (based on number of hrs in class) 1991 Non- Mem/Mem 1990 Non- Mem/Mem 1989 Non- Mem/Mem 24 hrs $3.25 / 3.00 $3.25 / 3.00 53.00 / 2.75 21 hrs $3.50 / 3.25 $3.50 / 3.25 all hrs. same rate 20 hrs $3.50 / 3.25 53.50 / 3.25 18 hrs 53.50 / 3.25 $3.50 / 3.25 16 hrs $3.50 / 3.25 $3.50 / 3.25 14 hrs $3.75 / 3.50 $3.75 / 3.50 12 hrs $3.75 / 3.50 $3.75 / 3.50 10 hrs $3.75 / 3.50 $3.75 / 3.50 9 hrs $3.75 / 3.50 $3.75 / 3.50 8 hrs $3.75 / 3.50 $3.75 / 3.50 6 hrs $4.25 / 4.00 $4.25 / 4.00 ARENA (Total revenue inc. $25,600) Single Hour Rate (as of Sept.) $90.00 590.00 $85.00 Open Skating (Youth & Adult) 52.50 52.50 52.50 Skate Rental 51.06 51.06 $1.06 .Skate Sharpening 52.00 52.00 51.50 Season Tickets (Eff. 10/1/89) Resident Family 556.00 $56.00 555:00 Resident Individual 536.00 536.00 $35.00 Non - Resident Family 570.00 570.00 562.00 Non - Resident Individual 545.00 545.00 $45.00 Classes (as of 1/1/90) 550.00 $50.00 $45.00 "V , Pistol 1/2 hour $5.00 $4.00 54.00 25 rounds trap 54.50 54.50 54.50 Building /hr 545.00 545.00 545.00 Firearm Safety $6.00 $6.00 56.00 POOL Season Tickets Resident Family 546.00 $46.00 546.00 Resident Individual $30.00 530.00 $30.00 Non - Resident Family $54.00 $54.00 554.00 Non-Resident Individual 536.00 $36.00 $36.00 Daily Admission Adult & Youth $2.50 $2.50 52.50 PARK 8 RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1991 FEES & CHARGES GOLF COIRtSE (Total revenue inc.S81,400) Patron Cards Individual $%.00 $50.00 S50.00 $8,000.00 Additional Family Members S50.00 545.00 545.00 S2,000.00 Computerized Handicaps Resident $12.00 512.00 S11.00 Non - Resident S16.00 516.00 515.00 Lockers Men's 7211 535.00 535.00 S33.00 Men's 42" 525.00 525.00 522.00 Ladies' 72" 515.00 515.00 S14.00 Club Rental 55.00 $5.00 S5.00 Pull Carts 52.00 52.00 51.75 Golf Cars 18 holes 518.00 518.00 S18.00 9 holes $10.00 510.00 59.50 Golf Cars - Seniors 18 holes $16.00 516.00 $15.50 9 holes S9.00 59.00 58.50. Group Golf lessons Adult 547.00 547.00 545.00 S1,000.00 Junior S25.00 S25.00 525.00 Golf Range Large Bucket 54.00 54.00 S3.75 520,000.00 Small Bucket S2.75 52.75 52.50 Warm-up Bucket 51.25 51.25 S1.00 Green Fees 18 hole - non - patron 515.00 514.50 513.50 $5,500.00 18 hole - patron 512.00 511.50 510.00 S10,000.00 9 hole - non- patron 59.00 59.00 58.50 9 hole - patron S7.50 S7.50 S7.00 Green Fees - Senior 18 hole - non - patron 514.00 513.50 S12.50 S500.00 18 hole - patron S11.00 S10.50 S9.00 53,000.00 9 hole - non - patron 58.50 58.50 58.00 9 hole - patron 57.00 57.00 56.50 Group,Fees S20.00 520.00 517.00 Group Fees - 9 hole $12.00 512.00 510.00 Group Car Fees S24.00 $24.00 522.00 Executive Course Adult - non - patron 56.50 56.25 56.25 53;000.00 Adult - patron $5.50 55.25 S5.25 52,000.00 Sr. 8 Jr. - non-patron 55.50 S5.25 55.25 5300.00 Sr. 8 Jr. - patron $4.50 $4.25 54.25 S2,000.00 Golf Cars - everyone 57.00 57.00 $7.00 Pull Carts S1.75 51:75 S1.75 Group Fees - 57.25 57.00 S7.00 5200.00 Braemar Room Night Rate - resident S550.00 S500.00 5450.00 5500.00 Night Rate - non-resident 5600.00 5550.00 5500.00 51,500.00 Day Rate - resident 5250.00 $250.00 S225.00 Day Rate - non-resident 5300.00 5300.00 S275.00 Concession Fees Variable prices (Concession is an annual increase of 5%, as a general rule) PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1991 FEES & CNAMS GOLF DOZE 52.50 52.50 $2.50 Large Bucket $6.50 $4.50 14.25 Sr. /Jr. Bucket 54.25 54.25 $4.00 Time Golf 1/2 hour $6.95 56:95 56.00 Soccer rental /hour $90.00 590.00 585.00 League 5495.00 5495.00 5475.00 EDINSOROLMN (Total revenue inc.S80,225) Daily Passes 52.50 52.50 $2.50 Season Passes Edina individual $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 Edina family 5200.00 5200.00 5200.00 Nan -Edina individual 5200.00 5200.00 5200.00 Non -Edina family 5250.00 $250.00 5250.00 Locker Fee discontinued Towel Fee 5.50 5.50 5.50 Skate Rental Fee 51.25 51.25 51.25 Box Lunch Program Range $6 - $10 Range $6 - 510 Domestic Photography by Professionals per hour Grotto 550.00 550.00 550.00 Theater 575.00 575.00 575.00 Great Hall 575.00 575.00 575.00 Ice Rink $100.00 $100.00 5100.00 Commercial Photography by Professional per hour Grotto 5150.00 5150.00 5150.00 Theater 5200.00 5200.00 5200.00 Great Hall 5300.00 5300.00 5300.00 Ice Rink $300.00 5300.00 5300.00 Mixed Use 5500.00 5500.00 5500.00 Birthday Party Table ( /table) discontirxied $15.00 $15.00 Table Rental to Corp. East & Park Plaza 55.00 $5.00 55.00 Dance Floor Included in Rental Included in Rental 550.00 Mirror Ball Included in Rental Included in Rental $20.00 Catering Kitchen Group size 200 Included in Rental Included in Rental $50.00 Group size 300 Included in Rental Included in Rental $75.00 Group size 500 Included in Rental Included in Rental 5100.00 Commercial Use i.e. Trade Shows 52,500.00 52,500.00 52,000.00 Building Rentals Category 1 City of Edina & Boards/ 5150 /day + S12 /men 5150 /day + 512 /men $150 /day + 512 /man Associations set -up /down set-up /down set -up /down Category 2 Edina Civic Organizations and Edina Schools (Mon -Thu) Great Hall 5125.00 5125.00 5125.00 Arena 550.00 550.00 550.00 Theatre 550.00 550.00 550.00 Pool 575.00 $75.00 MAO Grotto $25.00 525.00 525.00 Category 3 Edina Residents & Businesses (per hour) Great Hall 5300.00 5300.00 5300.00 Grotto 575.00 575.00 575.00 Arena $125.00 $125.00 5125.00 Theatre 5125.00 5125.00 5125.00 Pool 560.00 560.00 560.00 PARK &.RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1991 FEES & CHARGES Category 4 Non -Edina Residents and Business (per hour) Great Hall $350.00 5350.00 5350.00 Grotto $125.00 5125.00 5125.00 Arena 5150.00 5150.00 5150.00 Theatre 5150.00 5150.00 $150.00 Pool 585.00 585.00 $85.00 Category 5 Exclusive Rentals *Friday Nights $1,300.00 51,700.00 *Saturday Nights 51,500.00 $1,700.00 *Reductions are a result of our 1990 comparison study of Minneapolis banquet facilities. Price reductions are recovered in service commissions. PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS General Park Areas: Picnic Shelters: Showmobile: Rental of Athletic Fields: Associations Residents and Non-Residents: Arneson Acres Terrace Room Tupa Park Cahill School Grange Hall S50 /hr - commerical use (i.e. TV Comercials) 5100 /hr with lights S70 /group at Lake Cornelia Park 5700 /day Baseball, Softball, Football, Soccer Cost = Expenses (includes overhead) Per Day - S100 /per field /per day plus expenses Per Hour - $35 /per field /per hour S55 /per field /per hour with lights 5125 /day (S50 1st hour minimum, S25 /hr after) 5125 /day (S50 1st hour minimum, 525 /hr after) I o e tA � REPORT /RECOMMENDATION z JooBee To' Mayor Richards and Council From: Bob 'Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept. Date: June 13, 1991 Subject: Golf Course 'Improvements Recommendation: Agenda Item* VI . C. 2 Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Bill Lord MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE TWO FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS: CLUBHOUSE FEASIBILITY EXPANSION FOR ARCHITECT REPORT AND OLD MAINTENANCE BUILDING REPLACEMENT FOR $86,200. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. o D ..a �5� . 6? Info /Background: I ;w F� From the Park Board May 14th Minutes: Mr. Kojetin stated that at the end of the last Park Board meeting he had talked about a work book schedule he was preparing for the golf course. He indicated that in the past there was a ten year plan, then it was a five year plan and now it is a three year plan. He stated that things change so fast and the golf course needs to keep up -to -date on everything. Mr. Kojetin noted that a couple of years ago a presentation was made to the Park Board on the construction of a tee oasis on each one of the holes of the 18 hole course and the executive course. These tee oasis' would designate each one of the holes, they would have a brick surface, a certain species of flowering trees, benches, trash receptacles and ball washers. Over a period of approximately three years this project is to be completed. At present six have been completed. At the same presentation it was indicated that the golf course should continue to upgrade the tee fairways, ruffs and general overall improvement of pathways and trees. The golf course is now in its second year of -this project. Mr. Kojetin noted that the work book goes to 1993 which will hopefully complete the total project. The work book also indicates improvements for the next five years. A work book was sent to each Park Board member to give them an opportunity to see the upgrading and reconstruction of each hole and which year the improvement will be done. Also, the work book indicates the amount of equipment purchased, the total cost of maintenance improvements and also the annual repairs and upkeep of the clubhouse, dome and driving range. All of these areas are covered under line item improvements in the yearly operating budget for the golf course. These average a total of $196,000 per year, which will be invested back into the golf course on an annual basis. Mr. Kojetin stated that he used a 3 percent increase on revenue for expenses for the next two years in figuring the operating budget. Major capital expenses that will be needed could come from the net profit each year from the golf course. Items such as the clubhouse and upgraded improvements of the old maintenance building could come from the net profit of the 1990 budget. The balance of the net that is not used could be set aside in a reserve for a capital improvement to the clubhouse in 1992 or 1993 of what is left over in the,net profits of the operating budget. This way revenue bonds would not have to be sold for upgrading the clubhouse. Bob Christianson asked if this was a change of philosophy. He does not recall establishing a reserve and also noted that this is a new concept. Mr. Kojetin noted that money has always been reinvested back into the facility. If money is put into a reserve then work can start on a clubhouse and bonds will not be needed. Mr. Christianson asked if this would be a dedicated fund. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would not. It was noted that this is contrary to what was said at a previous discussion. Mr. O'Connor asked where the fund would come from? Mr. Montgomery asked if it is strictly from'the 18 hole course. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would come from the total operation of the golf course, golf dome and executive course. The Park Board's concern is the term reserve.' Mr. Christianson indicated that the position of the Braemar Group was assurance that profits stay with the golf course. It was his understanding that the money was not specially allocated to any one thing, the council could allocate improvements as it deemed necessary. Mr. Valliere indicated that he felt the golf course is generating enough net income so as in the next couple of years money could be allocated for improvements to the clubhouse without selling revenue bonds. At this time it's not known what the improvement would cost for the expansion of the clubhouse administrative area. It is important to have the clubhouse completed before the construction of the new nine hole course. Mr. Lord indicated that he felt you expose yourself when you show money in a reserve. Mr. O'Connor stated that anyone knows you cannot predict net income. It was noted again that the term reserve is the problem. Mr. Valliere indicated that the golf course is doing well financially as well as in maintenance and upkeep. By including these items in the operating budget each year it's easier to have the ability to manage the facility with these items in the maintenance budget and then certain areas of major projects over $150,000 each year could be considered. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. May 14, 1991 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK MAINTENANCE GARAGE MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Beth Hall, Pat Vagnoni, Mac Thayer, Andy Montgomery, Bill Jenkins, Bill Lord, James Fee,. Chip Sour, Paul O'Connor MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean Rydell STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Bill Bach, Tom Shirley, John Valliere, Todd Anderson, Susan Weigle, Jackie Onischuck TOUR OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Mr. Kojetin handed out information on the cost of the park's facilities as well as general information on the park. Mr. Kojetin then proceeded with the Park Board on a tour of the west side of the park and discussed different features and uses of the park. Mr. Kojetin noted that the front of the pavilion was built so it would be similar to a stage and the front entrance would be like a proscenium arch of a theater. The front mall area will have fountains and a seating capacity for approximately 150 people to watch choral concerts and other entertainment activities. The saloon area on the lake side of the pavilion could be divided into two areas which will have rental meeting rooms for a variety of private groups. The outside area will be a picnic area where a fireplace will serve as a cooking area or in the winter time as a warming area. The main pavilion area will also be where the administrative offices for Centennial Lakes as well. as Edinborough Park will be located. Mr. Kojetin explained that the asphalt is temporary material where the amphitheater is located. He stated there was a lot of rejuggling with amenities within the park and also cut backs. so that some type of an asphalt path on the east side of the-lake and a second bridge could be completed in phase I. The original intention was to leave all of the east side area as is, without grass, but it was decided that since Phase II and III had no starting date as much of the park as possible should be completed now. Mr. Kojetin then proceeded into the park maintenance garage where the Park Board meeting was held. Mr. Kojetin introduced Bill Bach and Tom Shirley, Assistant Manager, to give a brief report on the programming' of the park as well as a tentative schedule of the grand opening on June 29 and 30. Mr. Bach explained the plans for the grand opening ceremony. Right now a laser light show.is tentatively planned which would be funded by Laukka, Gabbert & Beck and also from some of the retailers. Mr. Bach also explained the tentative fee schedule for renting the pavilion and the two saloon rooms.° It was decided that a short meeting will be held after the Park Board Tour in June so the Park Board has time to study the fee schedule and make a recommendation to the City Council for fees and charges. Mr. Christianson stated that the facility is fabulous and looks like it is really coming along. Other Park Board members also commented on how well the park and lake look in reality compared to what the plans were a few years ago. II. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 9. 1991 MINUTES Andrew Montgomery MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 9, 1991 MINUTES. Chip Sour SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. III. GOLF COURSE REPORT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Mr. Kojetin stated that at the end of the last Park Board meeting he had talked about a work book schedule he was preparing for the golf course. He indicated that in the past there was a ten year plan, then it was a five year plan and now it is a three year plan. He stated that things change so fast and the golf course needs to keep up -to -date on everything. Mr. Kojetin noted that a couple of years ago a presentation was made to the Park Board on the construction of a tee oasis on each one of the holes of the 18 hole course and the executive course. These tee oasis' would designate each one of the holes, they would have a brick surface, a certain species of flowering trees, benches, trash receptacles and ball washers. Over a period of approximately three years this project is to be completed. At present six have been completed. At the same presentation it was indicated that the golf course should continue to'upgrade the tee fairways, ruffs and general overall improvement of pathways and trees. The golf course is now in its second year of this project. Mr. Kojetin noted that the work book goes to 1993 which will hopefully complete the total project. The work book also indicates improvements for the next five years. A work book was sent to each Park Board member to give them an opportunity to see the upgrading and reconstruction of each hole and which year the improvement will be done. Also, the work book indicates the amount of equipment purchased, the total cost of maintenance improvements and also the annual repairs and upkeep of the clubhouse, dome and driving range. All of these areas are covered under line item improvements in the yearly operating budget for the golf course. These average a total of $196,000 per year, which will be invested back into the golf course on an annual basis. Mr. Kojetin stated that he used a 3 percent increase on revenue for expenses for the next two years . in figuring the operating budget. Major capital expenses that will be needed could come from the net profit each year from the golf course. Items such as the clubhouse and upgraded improvements of the old maintenance building could come from the net profit of the 1990 budget. The balance of the net that is not used could be set aside in a reserve for a capital improvement 2 n, ,v to the clubhouse in 1992 or 1993 of what is left over in the net profits of the operating budget. This way revenue bonds would not have to be sold for upgrading the clubhouse. Bob Christianson asked if this was a change of philosophy. He does not recall establishing a reserve and also noted that this is a new concept. Mr. Kojetin noted that money has always been reinvested back into the facility. If money is put into a reserve then work cart start on a clubhouse and bonds will not be needed. Mr. Christianson asked if this would be- a dedicated fund. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would not. It was noted that this is contrary to what was said at a previous discussion. Mr. O'Connor asked where the fund would come from? Mr. Montgomery asked if it is strictly 'from the, 18 hole course. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would come from the total operation of the golf course, golf dome and executive course. The Park Board's concern is the term reserve. Mr. Christianson indicated that the position of the. Braemar-Group was assurance that profits stay with the golf course. It was his understanding that the money was not specially allocated to any one thing, the council could allocate improvements as it deemed necessary. Mr. Valliere indicated that he felt.the golf course is generating enough net income so as in the next'couple of years money could be allocated for improvements to the clubhouse without selling revenue bonds. At this time it's not known what-the improvement would cost for the expansion of the clubhouse administrative area. It is important to have the clubhouse completed before the construction of the new nine hole course. Mr. Lord indicated that he felt you expose yourself when you show money in a reserve. Mr. O'Connor stated that, anyone knows you cannot predict net income. It was noted again that the term reserve is the problem. Mr. Valliere indicated that the golf course is doing well financially as well as in maintenance and upkeep. By including these items in the operating budget each year it's easier to have the ability to manage the facility with these items in the maintenance budget and then certain areas of major projects over $150,000 each year could be considered. Bill Lord MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE TWO FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS.: CLUBHOUSE FEASIBILITY EXPANSION FOR ARCHITECT REPORT AND OLD MAINTENANCE BUILDING REPLACEMENT FOR $86,200. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. IV. SWIMMING POOL REPORT Mr. Kojetin handed out information sheets on the swimming pool bids. Mr. Kojetin stated that the bids did not come in very good. He has met with the architect and the contractor who was the low bidder to analyze and compare the report that was given to the. city last summer, in regards to what went wrong. There was a total of 550,000 allocated in the budget for the improvement of the pool. The general base bid of $549,000 includes the play structure but not the slide. The slide would be an additional $85,300. The bid came in at $173,300 over what was allocated. Mr. Kojetin 3 stated that they have been trying to come up with different ways to generate the additional funding. With a revised fee analysis an additional $23,701 could be generated. It was asked if we could benefit from a rebid. Mr. Kojetin stated that if we did rebid either the water slide or the play structure would have to be dropped or made smaller in order to be in the $550,000' budget. Mr. Kojetin noted that the item that really threw everything off was the play structure. It came in at $128,000 instead of $60,000 which was the original estimate. Mr. Kojetin indicated that if either the play structure or the water slide were eliminated then certain targeted age groups would be neglected. If the play structure were eliminated there would be an impact on the revenue from the family season ticket because this is targeted for pre - schoolers up to 7 years of age. If the water slide is eliminated this would have an impact on the revenue for the general admission because this is targeted for elementary age children and Jr. High kids. Also areas of impact on the high bid was the state taxes that the contractor would have to pay for the play structure and other direct alternate items that could be purchased outright. Mr. Christianson indicated that there are certain rules that could apply to a Municipality. A purchaser could be appointed to purchase materials and the state sales tax could be eliminated. Mr. Kojetin said that he would investigate this idea. Mr. Kojetin indicated that if the,water slide and play structure were, completely eliminated, there is still a minimum of $400,000 worth of improvements that need to be done to upgrade the pool to health codes. If the wading pool was completely eliminated or were a.smaller size there would still need to be a separate filter system and some type of stainless steel gutter. It is not permissible under health standards to use filtered water from the large pool or have circulation jets above the water for a fountain effect, they have to be at least 6 inches under the water. All of. these additional health codes that are set by the state have been added to the original projected cost between the contractor and the engineer. Mr. Kojetin stated they have tried to isolate all of these costs. The Park Board asked Mr. Kojetin what his recommendation is. Mr. Kojetin stated this is a hard decision. It would be very difficult to eliminate either one of the two revenue structures. The figures of the revised fees could generate an additional $23,000 needed for bonds. Mr. Kojetin said that he would recommend the Park Board to accept the present bid for $723,000. The Park Board asked Mr. MacHolda if he felt that other pools in the area had generated more attendance when they built a water slide. He indicated that the Crystal pool generated an additional $78,000 with it's water slide. It was noted that Richfield's slide will be opening around June 14, 1991. Pat Vagnoni MOVED THAT A RECOMMENDATION BE MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO GO AHEAD WITH THE REVISED PLAN TO UPDATE THE POOL FOR THE $723,300. Chip Sour SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. 4 V. OTHER Mr. Montgomery stated that he has checked out a "few of the tennis courts and has not been very happy with them. Walnut Ridge is in good shape. Both of Creek Valley's courts are in poor shape. Mirror Lakes, which was done a year ago, has a crack and the nets are ripped. Normandale is in poor shape. He also stated that the high school courts are in excellent condition. Mr. Montgomery is very concerned about this. Mr. Kojetin indicated that at a previous Park Board meeting a discussion was held and the 1991 capital budget indicates that the Normandale tennis court will be redone. Also, courts will be resurfaced based on a survey being done by a private contractor. VI. ADJOURNMENT Paul O'Connor MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:30 P.M. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. The June Meeting Will Be Held at 7:00 P.M. and Will Begin With a Tour 5 A. o e `:� O •'N�bRPORfl)t • 88 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item # VI . D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 17, 1991 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: 0 To' Council RACCOON COTdTROL Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑..Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: In accordance with the proposal for a raccoon includes two programs. nuisance complaints on complaint, the contrac- complainant's property successful trapping is Council's request, staff has solicited a control program in the City. The proposal The first program involves responding to a case -by -case basis. Upon receiving a for would place a live trap on the to trap nuisance animals. The cost per ,$60 per animal. The second program involves a demonstration project which would attempt to reduce population levels in a particular neighborhood. The attached proposal outlines the program which would cost $6,950.00. The program would last for 40 days and would take place this fall if approved by the Council. The Council should be aware of several issues concerning these programs. First, the programs are not budgeted - costs would be charged to the contingency budget. Second, the relocation of (over) Report /Recommendation - Raccoon Control Program June 17, 1991 Page 2 trapped animals is not feasible. Animals would be live trapped, but would be destroyed later. Third, the demonstration project is experimental in nature. We cannot predict our success rate or the rate at which raccoons repopulate the demonstration area. If the Council wishes to proceed with the demonstration project, we suggest that residents of the neighborhood be invited to an information meeting conducted by staff and the contractor. Following this meeting, the council should conduct a hearing prior to authorizing the project. PF-K1' CONTIto 1. LAUGHLIN'S C R I T T E R - C O N T R O L O L D I V I S I O N June 7, 1991 Mr. Gordon Hughes Assistant City Manager City-of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes, We want to explain the methods amd general parameters concerning the raccoon control program for the City of Edina. There are a number of factors to consider when addressing the nusiance raccoon problem in your city. First, the areas that complain about raccoons are near A stream, pond, swamp or a lake. The raccoon populations are very high and will continue to grow and move further from their natural habitat since there are no predators to control these animals. Second, when trapping these animals we will use live traps. We ( Critter Control ) or the home owner must check these traps every, 24 ( twenty -four ) hours. These animals must not be released after they have been caught in the homeowners' yard because the raccoon will become trap -shy and be much harder to trap the next time. Third, these animals, must be euthanized (destroyed). The raccoon population throughout the metro area is exploding and to re- locate these animals to any other area would only transfer the animal problem to the new release areas. I have put together a two part proposal for your review. The first part deals with nusiance raccoons and how we would handle the calls, animals, homeowners and /or landowners. The second part of the proposal is a program of intensive general trapping: We will define the area'and trap raccoons intensively for a period of 40 days. The fees for such programs are included. 1'11? lInivrrsiIN A%c.. SI. 1'miL N1 55114 . (61_') 646-61 l��n ;,niir l A,%1 .l mr /I Sim c l920 (over) No. 910610 ML Location: City of Edina Edina, Nn. 55424 RE: Raccoon Control Services . for The City of Edina Attn: Gordon Hughes Ph. 9 927 -8861 I. SCOPE OF WORK AND PESTS COVERED Raccoon control services are to be rendered by Laughlin's Pest Control Co., Inc. ( Critter Control Division ) for the reduction of the raccoon population within the city of Edina. PLAN 1 - Raccoon nuisance calls will be handled in the following manner: when we receive the call a technician will be despatched to set a live trap at the request of the city. The trap will be set at the address of the complaint, the property owner will receive instructions on how to apprise us of the condition of the trap whether a raccoon has been trapped or the trap has been sprung and needs to be reset. We will service the trap, when we receive notification, within 24 hours. Our technician will determine the number and location of traps to be set. PLAN 2 - General trapping will start by defining a particular area within the city, then concentrating a large number of traps within that area. These traps will be serviced once every 24 hours. This process will continue for a period of 40 - days. Evaluation- of -tbe- program will -be done at the conclusion of.the initial 40 days to determine the effectiveness of this program. II. SCHEDULE AND SERVICE FREQUENCY Laughlin's Pest Control Co., Inc. ( Critter Control Division) service representative will service the traps as described above as soon as can be arranged. III. REOORDKEEPING A written report of each service visit will be submitted to you for your review and records with a weekly report of total animals trapped in this program. IV. .AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY The areas included in Plan 1 will be the entire city. The boundries included in Plan 2 will be - on the North - Sunnyside Road - on the East Browndale Ave. - On the South - West 50th St. - on the West - Hwy. 100 V. NATURE OF WORK All trapping work shall be performed in a safe manner and in accordance with Federal, State and local fish & game laws. VI. TRAPS The traps used in raccoon control shall conform to Federal, State and local ordinances applying to the above type of trapping. VII. INSURANCE A certificate of insurance is available upon request. VIII. FEB AND BILLING Plan 1 Services $ 25.00/ Trap setting $ 35.00/ per animal Plan 2 Services $ 6,950.00 / 40 days General Trapping IY. AGREEMENT PERIOD This agreement will be effective for an original period of one year, and will renew itself annually unless either party cancels this agreement by giving thirty (30) days written notice. Y. COOPERATION The City of Edina will extend all necessary cooperation in insuring effective results from the trapping services. Whenever conditions conducive to the breeding and harborage of pests covered by this agreement are reported in writing by Laughlin's, the City will take the necessary steps to correct such conditions. Laughlin's is not responsible for damage to products or buildings and their contents. YII. SUPERVISION AND SCBMOLB on scheduled service visits Laughlin's representative will report to management before commencing service to review any special circumstances with regard to the trapping service. VIII. ACCEPTANCE The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. Laughlin's is authorized to do the work. Payment will be made as outlined in part IY. FEE and BILLING. Date of Acceptance _/_/_ 9tN Al o e A a0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION lees To: Ken Rosland Agenda Item *m# _YLE. From: Janet Chandler Consent ®. Information Only ❑ Date: June 10, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Purchasing Policy for ❑ To Council Recycled Products Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of Resolution Info/,Background This resolution encourages, but does not require, the purchase of materials with recycled content in City building or remodeling projects. Hennepin County requires cities to -adopt this (or similar) policy by July 1 in order to remain eligible for full 80% funding for recycling programs. City department managers have, in several instances, purchased recycled products and have expressed support for this policy. -over- RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY TO PROMOTE THE USE OF MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CONTENT IN MUNICIPALLY FUNDED BUILDING OR REMODELING PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Edina City Council wishes to promote the use of products containing recycled materials and thus encourage the development of markets for recyclables; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has established a policy to purchase recycled paper for use in all City offices; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners passed Resolution No. 90- 11- 842R1, requiring cities, in order to be eligible for 80% recycling funding, to adopt comprehensive procurement and specification policies for ° publicly funded construction and remodeling projects which give reasonable and appropriate consideration to materials with recycled content; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council adopts the following policy regarding the use of materials with recycled content in construction or remodeling of municipal buildings: 1. Standards and specifications for products used in construction or remodeling of municipal facilities will not prohibit the use of products with recycled content. 2. All bid specifications for improvements or construction of municipal facilities will contain the following statement: "The City of Edina encourages the use of recycled building materials wherever practical and appropriate, provided the product with recycled content meets the required performance specifications." 3. The City will. cooperate with neighboring City, County, and State governments in an effort to develop consistent and effective procurement efforts which promote the use'of recycled products in construction materials wherever practical and appropriate. 4. All City departments and agencies will cooperate to achieve the purposes of this policy and the goal of promoting the use of recycled material. 5. City departments shall forward reports of their activities in support of this policy to the City Manager or his designee. These reports shall be incorporated_ in an annual report to the Clerk of the Hennepin County Board. Adopted this day of , 1991. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY TO PROMOTE THE USE OF MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CONTENT IN MUNICIPALLY FUNDED BUILDING OR REMODELING PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Edina City Council wishes to promote the use of products containing recycled materials and thus encourage the development of markets for recyclables; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has established a policy to purchase recycled paper for use in all City offices; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners passed Resolution No. 90- 11- 842R1, requiring cities, in order to be eligible for 80% recycling funding, to adopt comprehensive procurement and specification policies for publicly funded construction and remodeling projects which give reasonable and appropriate consideration to materials with recycled content; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council adopts the following policy regarding the use of materials with recycled content in construction or remodeling of municipal buildings: 1. Standards and specifications for products used in construction or remodeling of municipal facilities will not prohibit the use of products with recycled content. 2. All bid specifications for improvements or construction of municipal facilities will contain the following statement: "The City of Edina encourages the use of recycled building materials wherever practical and appropriate, provided the product with recycled content meets the required performance specifications." 3. The City will cooperate with neighboring City, County, and State governments in an effort to develop consistent and effective procurement efforts which promote the use of recycled products in construction materials wherever practical and appropriate. 4. All City departments and agencies will cooperate to achieve the purposes of this policy and the goal of promoting the use of recycled material. 5. City departments shall forward reports of their activities in support of this policy to the City Manager or his designee. These reports shall be incorporated in an annual report to the Clerk of the Hennepin County Board. Adopted this day of "1991. o, I cn 0 .a� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler Date: June 10, 1991 Subject: Purchasing Policy for Recycled Products Recommendation: Adoption of Resolution Info/Background- Agenda Item # -IL E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion This resolution encourages, but does not require, the purchase of materials with recycled content in City building or remodeling projects. Hennepin County requires cities to adopt this (or similar) policy by July 1 in order to remain eligible for full 80% funding for recycling programs. City department managers have, in several instances, purchased recycled products and have expressed support for this policy. -over- c� w�S�1r'1r eA t4 Cn yea. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: JUNE 14, 1991 Subject: WATERMAIN CONNECTION 6000 ARBOUR LANE Agenda Item # VILA Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of the following resolution: UPCl1T T rTnnT BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge to Watermain No. 206 in the amount of $875.34 to be levied against Lot 4, Block 2, COUNTRYSIDE (PIN 32- 117- 21- 43- 0013)'over a six year period at the rate of 9.0 %, payable starting in 1992. Info /Background: The attached letter from Thomas and Sandra Maloney, 6000 Arbour Lane, requests that the City assess the charges for connection to the City's Watermain Lateral No. 206, with assessment to be spread over six years at the current rate of interest. It has been the policy of the City to assess.such costs for connection when requested by residents. '�1ov►� X1/1 Son if C, 14AC.0n (p00o A196c) u e— 2n. toyNA CT I.I a 1 I y �D/04 NA� AtfiP.rtTion: 1�5. iv 17e- I &Jar . ec ) un e , �c)✓)2 I ) ) Cj J / 3,9-..117- 21 -43- Uo l3 104 1- 3 Ik 2 G C)u.N i ri ` ; d e. " t 1�11 o 6 DOCO S /on on j J ui2 . as t. f e .% 1Y- c&.e ee z1 Vale. o4 0'W ow ��s--79 fY y RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED -by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge to..Watermain No. 206 in the amount of $875.34 to be levied against Lot 4, Block 2, COUNTRYSIDE (PIN 32- 117 -21 -43 -0013) over a six year period at the rate of 9..0%, payable.starting in.1992. ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA. ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly.adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of June, 1991. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk I AGENDA ITEM VIII.A RESOLUTION OPPOSING IACAL OPTION SALES TAX WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has adopted legislation providing that county boards may vote to enact a.local option one -half cent sales tax; and WHEREAS, under this law the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners must vote to implement the local option sales tax in Hennepin County; and. WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has asked the cities to present a resolution stating their preference on the local option sales tax; and WHEREAS, there.has been no projection made as to the impact of potential program cuts if the one -half cent sales tax option is not adopted by Hennepin County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, given the uncertainty of the impact on the citizens of Edina of the local option sales tax, the Edina City Council would urge the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to not impose the local option one -half cent sales tax. ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1991. Agenda Item VIII.B METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 -1634 612 291 -6359 FAX 612 291 -6550 77Y 612 291 -0904 DATE: May 31, 1991 TO: Local Government Officials and Legislators FROM: Mary Anderson, ChairwfN SUBJECT: REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETINGS IN BENNEPIN COUNTY June 25, and July 1, 1991 , The Metropolitan Council is beginning to develop its work program and budget for 1992. The Council members and I are anxious to hear your ideas about the future work of the Council and how you think we can best serve the region. Wd hope you will join us at our annual chair's regional breakfasts, which we are holding in June and July this year to provide you with the opportunity to comment and make suggestions. If you cannot attend the meetings we hope you will send your thoughts to me in writing. During May, the Council is preparing its first draft of a list of priorities for the staff to consider in proposing a work program and budget. The staff will develop and present this proposed budget to the Council during June and July. By that time, we will have received your comments, and will include them in our considerations as we review and modify the staffs proposed budget for the public hearing process. A hearing will be held on the revised proposed budget in August or September. I am posing the following three. questions for you to consider as we focus on long -term visioning as well as the immediate budget process. Please suggest what we should do in the short term (1992 work program) to work toward the long -term vision you see for the Council. 1. What are the major opportunities /challenges /issues that you believe the region faces now and over the next 10 -20 years? 2. In view of the above, what would you or your organization like the Council to do in our region? 3. How do you see us accomplishing this? Details for the Hennepin County breakfasts. follow. I look forward to seeing and hearing from you. -over- Hennepin South: When: Tuesday, June 25, 7:30 -9 a.m. Where: T. Wrights 3310 S. Hwy 101 Wayzata Cost: $4, includes breakfast, tax and gratuity RSVP: Please call Rosemarie Coleman at 291 -6630 by June 21 Hennepin North: When: Where: Cost: RSVP: ii 7vunuay, July i, :30 -9 a.ul. Days Inn Minneapolis North 1501, Freeway Blvd. - Brooklyn Center - -- $6, includes breakfast, tax and gratuity Please call Rosemarie Coleman at 291 -6630 by June 27 1991 -CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 126E11 06/06/91 6.96- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126EIl 06/06/91 5.45- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126E11 06/06/91 .25- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126EII 06/06/91 15.00- EAGLE WINE 5073710- 862 -86 MANUAL 126EIl 06/06/91 .97- EAGLE WINE 50 =3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 126EII 06/06/91 696.35 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126EIl 06/06/91 544.95' EAGLE -WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1.26E11 06/06/91 25.40 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 126E11 06/06/91 97.30 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126Ell 06/06/91 1,499.84 EAGLE WINE_ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126EII 06/05/91 70.33 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 126E11. 06/05/91 80.94 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 2,986.48 * ** -CKS 126E26 06/06/91 19.77- ED PHILLIPS 5073710 - 822 =82 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 1.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 21.58- ED'PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 3.38- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 13.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 988.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 1,079.29 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 70.00 "ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 666.38 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 169.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 348.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 383.24 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 1,078.22 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 -MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 434.60 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 932.95 ED.PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 835.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126E26 06/06/91 280.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 =86 MANUAL 126E26 06/05/91 177.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 7,383.83 " **5k-CKS 126G82 06/06/91 25.58- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 6.06- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 126G82• 06/06/91 63.17- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 58.83- GRIGGS•COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 53.30 - GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 1,278.94 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 302.85 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 2,941.67 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 126G82 - 06/06/91 3,107.99 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126G82 06/05/91 50.57 GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR 50- 4626 = 842 -84 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 2,664.79 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 126G82 06/06/91 25.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - 10,114.03 * 126H83 06/05/91 124,000.00 HRA HRA ADVANCE 10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 124,000.00 * _ * * * * ** " ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 126J62 06/06/91 11.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06 ,A06191 4.91- JOHNSON WINE ! 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 5.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62. 06/06/91 .58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 58.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 6' 08- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 .06/06/91 63.25- JOHNSON WINE. 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 3.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 101.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 6.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 7.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 7862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 61.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 2.07- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126362 06/06/91 2,912.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 17.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 39.83 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 3,163.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 5,076.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 20.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 3,075.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 100.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 58.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 528.52. JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 13.57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 495.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL' 126J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON.WINE I 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 334.88 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 -MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -.84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 610.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 162.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 14.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 665.15• JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 179.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 736.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 206.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 126J62 06/06/91 17.11 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 18,143.09 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 126P20 06/06/91 295.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126P20 06/06/91 6.40 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 302.35 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO.'INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * *" -CKS 126P70 06/05/91 5,000.00 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 5,000.00 " * ** -CKS 126P82 06/06/91 6.17- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 2.89- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 1.90- PRIOR WINE 50- 842 -84 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 10.64- PRIOR WINE ,3710- 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 5.51- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 617.00 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 289.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 189.80 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 1,063.70 PRIOR'WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126P82 06/06/91 551.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,684.19 * * * * ** • * ** -CKS 126Q16 06/06/91 7.01- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 36.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 1.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL - 126016 06/06/91. 3.40- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 68.14- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 .43 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126016 06/06/91 5.76- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 90.81- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 1,829.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 3,406.71 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 4,540.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 697.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 169.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 337.99 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 573.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 126Q16 06/06/91 42.50- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11,300.88 * * * * ** * "" -CKS 127701 06/05/91 250.00 MN D.N.R. PERMIT 10 -4201- 358 -30 MANUAL 250.00 " " ** -CKS 127E33 06/05/91 16.00 CHAMBER /COMMERCE CHAMBER MEETING 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 16.00 " - " "" -CKS 130033 06/05/91 150,800.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 13OC33 06/05/91 150,800.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE k k k k k k 130C47 06/05/91 k k k k k k 133F14 06/05/91 133F14 06/05/91 k k k k k k 133P32 06/05/91 kkkkkk - MANUAL 134E11 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/9.1 134E11 06/06/91 134EIl 06/06/91 134EIl 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/91 134EII 06/06/91 134E11 06/05/91 134EII 06/05/91 k k k k k k MANUAL 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 134E26 06/06/91 AMOUNT 428.40 428.40 13,345.04 3,958.44 17,303.48 28,584.73 28,584.73 5.67 - 16.79- .72= .72- 6.73- 566.55. 1,679.06 72.00 673.37 71.90 42.45 119.49 3,194.19 3.84 - 21.07- 21.51- 192.00 1,053.51 1,075.90 710.90 536.15 55.00 306.00 889.50 858.65 837.22 319.50 1,218.10 917.00 1,408.79 1,707.40 12,039.20 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION i COMM LIFE INS LIFE INSURANCE FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK P.E.R.A. EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE. WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS FICA MEDICARE PERA MIX MIX 05 -31 -91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL k k k k k k * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 134G82 06/06/91 131.03- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 190.36- GRIGGS COOPER. 50- 3710 - 842 -84, MANUAL 134682 06/06/91 3.59- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 1.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 5.10- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 136.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 134682 06/06/91 2.03- GRIGGS COOPER - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 3.77- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 6,551.49 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 822 -82• MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 70.14 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 9,518.13 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134682 06/06/91 179.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 255.21 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 6,843.71 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134G82 06/06/91 101.30 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134682 06/06/91 188.73 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 23,234.22 * * R R R R * * * -CKS 134J62 06/06/91 5.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 2.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 4.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 38.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1.89- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 3.51- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 12.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 11.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 5.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 12.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 92.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 5.56- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 8.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 5.42- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 2.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 10.02- JOHNSON -WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 93.79 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 15.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 5.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1,925.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 556.02 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 4,646.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 35.99 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 4,689.70. JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 34.37 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 271.12 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 215.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 188.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 11.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 484.02 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 516.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.'-# P.O. # MESSAGE 134J62 06/06/91 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 3.54 JOHNSON WINE j 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 47.61- JOHNSON WINE 1 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91, 2.36 JOHNSON WINE .50- 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 32.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1,225.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134362 06/06/91 32.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 32.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1,225.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1,225.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 10.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 560.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 350.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 245.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 1,002.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 24.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134J62 06/06/91 829.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 17,560.71 ** *-CKS 134P20 06/06/91 9.60 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134P20 06/06/91 426.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134P20 06/06/91 7.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134P20 06/06/91 293.55 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 736.85 * ** -CKS 134P82 06/06/91 3.90- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 9.65 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 =84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 9.65- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 9.65- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 7.31- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 389.75 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 864.65- PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 964.65 PRIOR WINE. 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 864.65 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 134P82 06/06/91 730.85 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 134P82 06/05/91 42.07 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 2,106.46 " ** -CKS 134Q16 06/06/91 5.77- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 50.26- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 12.72- QUALITY WINE ' 50- 3710 - 842 -84. MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 114.27- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 5.06 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 11.29- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 83.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134Q16 06/06/91 2.04- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/06/91 134Q16 06/05/91 134505 06/06/91 134505 06/06/91 * * * * ** 134W89 06/06/91 134W89 06/06/91 * * * * ** 140C44 06/05/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR 6.02- QUALITY WINE 1.46- QUALITY WINE 2,513.69 QUALITY WINE 5,713.62 QUALITY WINE 252.92- QUALITY WINE 101.91 QUALITY WINE 300.80 QUALITY WINE 4,191.39 QUALITY WINE 710.90- QUALITY WINE 573.31 QUALITY WINE 710.90 QUALITY WINE 1,265.39 QUALITY WINE 145.40 QUALITY WINE 1,123.25 QUALITY WINE 56.18- QUALITY WINE 15,449.43 " 30- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 2.00 SALUD AMERICA 138.00 SALUD AMERICA 140.00 " 40- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 210.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 2.55 WORLD CLASS WINES 212.55 " 50- 3357 - 001 -00 140051 442.50 COKE MN DEPT /REV 442.50 " TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL * *" -CKS COKE 28- 4624 - 703 -70 MANUAL 140051 05 -31 -91 PAGE. 7 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 =4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- ,4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628-822-82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL ,MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL * *" -CKS COKE 28- 4624 - 703 -70 MANUAL 140051 06/05/91 213.03 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 301.03 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 23- 3357- 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 11.52 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 10,334.28 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 27- 3357- 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 345.10 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 91.20 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 382.31 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 331.36 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 140051 06/05/91 6,828.00 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 140051 06/05/91 13,134.48 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 140051 06/05/91 13,023.79 MN DEPT /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 * * * * ** 44,996.10 141EII 06/06/91 3.31- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 141E11 06/06/91 2•.52- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 141EII 06/06/91 1.44- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 141E11 06/06/91 .87 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * *" -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 141EII 06/06/91 5.55- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141EIl 06/06/91 .87- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141EII 06/06/91 555.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141EII 06/06/91 331.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141EIl 06/06/91 143.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141EII 06/06/91 251.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 141EIl 06/06/91 86.50- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141EII 06/06/91 86.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141EII 06/05/91 21.67 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 141EII 06/05/91 68.01 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,358.36 M A F F R * "*-CKS 141E26 06/06/91 1.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 3.37- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 19.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 7.18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 10.63- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 168.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 70.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 359.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 967.31 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 531.77 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 442.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 382.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 673.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 738.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 817.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 738.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 .. 1,192.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 462.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141E26 06/06/91 559.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141E26 06/05/91 261.05 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL • 8,321.45 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 141G82 06/06/91 2.81- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 24.66- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 2.10- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 141682 06/06/91 56.06- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 .08 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141682 06/06/91 .18 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 3.51- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 .18 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 18- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 71.57- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 1,233.17 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141G82 .06/06/91 140.28 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 105.21 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL, 141G82 06/06/91 2,802.92 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 3,578.47 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 06/06/91 175.35 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82 .06/06/91 8.27- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ e 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER - 05 -31 -91 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 141G82 06/06/91 18.01- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141G82- 06/06/91 17.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141682 06/06/91 17.83 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7,848.67 " " * " -CKS 141J62 06/06/91 9.89- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 19.56- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 4.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 5.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 .30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 2.71- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 42.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 9.83 -- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 14.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 4.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 93.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 .90- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91- 3.59- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86. MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 64.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 5.58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 10.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 14.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 2,123.43 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 4,682.24 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 31.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 21.24 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 3,243.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 179.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 30.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 522.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 13.57 JOHNSON WINE - 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 5.90 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91- 492.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 270.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 485.5-5 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1,- 414.59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 984.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 17.11 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 26.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 90.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 121.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 6.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 164.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 14062 06/06/91 5.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 557.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 28.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1.77 JOHNSON WfNE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141J62 06/06/91 1,067.53 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 16,308.32 * ** -CKS 141P82 06/06/91 2.80- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 6.22- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 141P82 06/06/91 .43- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 4.62- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 280.45 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 622.00 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 462.00 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141P82 06/06/91 43.45 PRIOR' WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141P82 06/05/91 25.24 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,419.07 * ** -CKS 141Q16 06/06/91 1.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 42.34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 14.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 12.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 .47- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 76.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 16.37- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 .47- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 96.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 16.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 16.37 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 2,1-17.17 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 58.96 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 3,810.05 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 4,830.41 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 1,447.,02 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 1,272.17 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842. -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 46.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 1,627.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 46.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 1,627.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 141Q16 06/06/91 1,627.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 14,996.65 * k R R * R * ** -CKS 141T22 06/06/91 123.06 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 141T22 06/06/91 61.00 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 184.06 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 143717 06/05/91 40.00 MN POLLUTION CONTROL CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 640 -64 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 143717 06/05/91 143771 06/05/91 143772 06/05/,91 * * * * ** 143M19 06/05/91 * * * * ** 143S60 144C33 144C33 148EII 148EII 148EII 148E11 148E11 148E11 148EII 148E11 148EII 148EIl 148EII 148E11 * * * * * * 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 148E26 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 AMOUNT 40.00 80.00 319,000.00 319,000.00 * 1,789.00 1,789.00 * 1,476.05 1,476.05 " 1,186.52 1,186.52 71,500.00 71,500.00- .00 5.85 - .72- 6.42- .87- 9.80- 1.44- 584.82 71.90 642.22 143.80 979.95 86.50 2,484.09 67.84 - 1.56- 7.48- 20.04- 2.32- 2.23- 27.34- 78.03 374.40 1,002.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN POLLUTION CONTROL CONFERENCE TITLE INS OF MN K SHARKEY SCHLOSSER MCGUIRE AUTO STATE OF MN CITY /EDINA CITY /EDINA EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS PURCHASE LAND PRO SERVICES REPAIR PARTS TAX PAYROLL TRANSFER PAYROLL TRANSFER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 507 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 25- 4934 - 000 -00 MANUAL 23- 4201 - 611 -61 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4310- 560 -56 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL •50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 148E26 06/06/91 111.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 1,367.41 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 116.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 - MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 536.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 942.89 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 870.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 52.50 ED PHILLIPS - 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 934.76 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 148E26 06/06/91 905.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 67.84 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 1,667.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 .00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 67.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 664.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 148E26 06/06/91 1,629.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11,123.93 A * * * F * ** -CKS 148F14 06/05/91 13,615.97 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 148F14 06/05/91 4,066.95 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 17,682.92 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 148G82 06/06/91 18.46- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 104.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 77.52- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 14.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 922.99 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 5,243.59 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 =84 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 3,875.98 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148G82 06/06/91 741.48 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148682 06/05/91 268.46 GRIGGS COOPER MIX 50- 4632' 842 -84 MANUAL 10,836.82 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 148J62 06/06/91 1.14- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 •3.63- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 3.30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 20.84- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 .95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 4.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 14BJ62 06/06/91 9.97 -. JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 57.32- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 8.58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 4.88 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 4.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 12.46- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 11.18- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 57.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 2.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 .58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148J62 06/06/91 1,041.09 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL * * * * * * 148P82 06/06/91 7.33- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 148P82 1991 CITY OF EDINA PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 CHECK REGISTER 06/06/91 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 148J62 06/06/91 7.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 24.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 2,867.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 19.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 2,860.28 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862.86 148J62 06/06/91 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 56.76 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 328.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62' 06/06/91 10.62 JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 95.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 366.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148J62 06/06/91 27.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 491.59 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 858.44 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 12.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 488.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 491.59- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 997.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 148J62 06/06/91 2.02 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 31.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 12.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 1,246-.43 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 185.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 58.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148J62 06/06/91 1,120.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 12,534.67 ! * * * * * 148P20 06/06/91 141.85 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148P20 06/06/91 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148P20 06/06/91 167.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148P20 06/06/91 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 148P20 06/05/91 53.00 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 370.75 * * * * * * 148P82 06/06/91 7.33- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 148P82 06/06/91 13.39- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 148P82 06/06/91 9.93- --PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 148P82 06/06/91 733.22 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 148P82 06/06/91 1,338.89 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 148P82 06/06/91 993.25 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 148P82 06/05/91 25.24 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * * * * ** 3,059.95 148Q16 06/06/91 9.78 -- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 148Q16 06/06/91 14.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 05 -31 -91 PAGE., 13 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL **k-CKS MANUAL MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 148Q16 06/06/91 1.46- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 3.19- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 9.20- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 2.97- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 35.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 1.46- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 1'48Q16 06/06/91 10.65- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 712.74 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 148.43 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 35.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 1,759.20 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 145.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 974.53 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 917.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 318.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 1,062.26 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 148Q16 06/06/91 145.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,059.98 h k h k h * ** -CKS 148S05 06/06/91 225.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148S05 06/06/91 2.55 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 227.55 k * k k k * ** -CKS 151F14 06/05/91 55.78 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 55.78 * ** -CKS 151P42 06/05/91 26,822.00 PHP INSURANCE 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 26,822.00 h h h h h A * ** -CKS 155EIl 06/06/91 3.46- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 155EII 06/06/91 3.04- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155EII 06/06/91 5.31- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155EII 06/06/91 .72- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86_ MANUAL 155E11 06/06/91 2.25- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155Ell 06/06/91 346.47 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 155EII 06/06/91 303.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155E11 06/06/91 71.90 EAGLE WINE .50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155EII 06/06/91 530.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 155Ell 06/06/91 224.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862. -86 MANUAL 155Ell 06/05/91 83.93 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,547.02 h t* k k k *** -CKS 155E26 06/06/91 4.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 1.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 15.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05- 31 -91' PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 155E26 06/06/91 6.12- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 22.11- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 1.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 78.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 216.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 774.35 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 306.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 1,105.69 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 81.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 420.23 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 172.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 423.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 42.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 49.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 704..00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 55 1.12 5tt.t4. ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 '418.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 618.49 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 155E26 06/06/91 6,651.5 *742*00 ED,PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** * ** -CKS 155G82 06/06/91 61.26- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 155G82 06/06/91 48.70- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 842 -84- MANUAL 155G82 06/06/91 108.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155G82 06/06/91 5.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155G82• 06/06/91 3,063.21 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 155G82 06/06/91 2,435.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL - 155G82 06/06/91 291.54 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155G82 06 /C6 /91 5,441.73 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11,006.86 * * * * ** * "* -CKS 155J62 06/06/91 3.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 3.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 .60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 24.19- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 90.51- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 5.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 2.16 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 9.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 2.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 1.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 2.16 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 5.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 .95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- .862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 8.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 92.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 .30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862. -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 8.85 JOHNSON. WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 1,209.74 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 31.87 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 4,525.59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -91 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 155J62 06/06/91 4,605.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 30.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 348.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06- /06/91 8.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 = 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 4.72 JOHNSON 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 302.90 ,WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 60.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 156.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 245.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 7.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 4.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 4.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 28.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 14.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 215.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 585.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 984.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 245.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 4.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 519.57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 30.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 828:40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 7.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 23.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 95.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155J62 06/06/91 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 14,364.14 :�...�. A *. -CKS 155P82 06/06/91 3.12- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 155P82- 06/06/91 7.65- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 6.95- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 .57- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 312.10 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 765.05 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 56.50 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 155P82 06/06/91 695.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 155P82 06/05/91 75.73 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,886.49 " ..�. *r ***-CKS 155Q16 06/06/91 46.96- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155016 06/06/91 3.56- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 2.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 .99- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 11.07- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 112.11- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842-84 MANUAL 155016 06/06/91 9.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 103.47- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 8.05- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 05 -31 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 1991 CITY OF EDINA MANUAL CHECK REGISTER MANUAL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 155Q16 06/06/91 2,348.58 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 155Q16 06/06/91 5,606.31 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 155Q16 06/06/91 476.75 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 5,173.65 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 236.25 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 354.14 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 98.45 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 1,104.58 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/06/91 800.99 QUALITY WINE 155Q16 06/05/91 30.44 QUALITY WINE MIX 155Q16 06/05/91 30.44 QUALITY WINE MIX 15,962.47 " 155505 06/06/91 2.00 SALUD AMERICA 155S05 06/06/91 52.00 SALUD- AMERICA 54.00 155T22 06/06/91 61.00 THE WINE COMPANY 61.00 * * * * ** 223,098.91 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,090.03 FUND 23 TOTAL ART_ CENTER 319,000.00 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 11.52 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 10,334.28 FUND 27 TOTAL COURSE FUND 787.60 FUND 28 TOTAL _GOLF RECREATION CENTER FUND 91.20 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 382.31 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 309,242.56 3�- 18 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUORYDISPENSARY FUND .865,369.77 *ee5, sus. TOTAL 05 -31 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- '4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 138J41 06/04/91 138.00 JIM HATCH SALES SHOVEL 10- 4580 - 301 -30 13580 4778 138.00 * ** -CKS . 138T30 06/04/91 13,013.80 THORPE DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 13,013.80 * * ** -CKS 167M27 06/06/91 450.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27163 5004 450.00 * * ** -CKS - 168701 06/04/91 1,094.40 SHERIFFS DEPT RENTAL 10- 4226 - 440 -44 4960 1,094.40 168702 06/04/91 533.00 NOBLE FARMS TREES 10- 4560- 644 -64 2064 3936 533.00 168703 06/04/91 354.00 FAST GLASS INC WINDOW REPLACEMENT. 10- 4248 - 646 -64 110297 5154 354.00 168704 06/04/91 20.75 ANDON GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 31552 3886 .68785 t68785 96'94 91 20.75 ei} 92 6 ; 8.6�94�91 249.08 61NDA KEN�AK -SERVIGES GER`viGES 99 4281 ?81 78 R " * k F ■ 30 4224 ?8i ?8 " *" -CKS 168707 06/04/91 238.25 ADOLPH KIEFER /ASSO POOL SUPPLIES 26- 4642- 681 -68 50766 238.25 * 168708 06/04/91 55.00 MN STATE BOARD OF ELECT INSULATION 10- 4504 - 540 -54 55.00 * 168709 06/04/91 139.58 FAIRWAY PRODUCTS CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 2211 4256 139.58 * 168710 06/04/91 57.62 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 58920 4100 168710 06/04/91 1,879.74 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 58954 4100 168710 06/04/91 1,529.10 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 58966 4100 168710 06/11/91 3,164.94 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS BLACKTOP 1074524 - 314 =30 58982 4200 168710 06/04/91 1,884.24 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 58971 4100 8,515.64 * 168711 06/04/91 1,366.00 COMPRESSED AIR REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 29849 47535 1,366.00 * 168712 06/04/91 40.00 POWER SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 84110 4890 40.00 * 168713 06/04/91 4,860.00 INDUST RUBBER /SUPPLY REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 26819 3972 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168713 06/04/91 168714 06/04/91 168715 06/04/91 168716 06/04/91 168717 06/04/91 168718 06/04/91 168719 06/04/91 168720 06/04/91 168721 06/04/91 168722 168723 168724 168725 168726 168727 * * * * ** 168730 168731 168732 168732 It 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06- 17 -91- PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 26820 4817 10- 4540 - 560 -56 39108A 4427 10- 4542 - 325 -30 15287 3927 10- 4504 - 318 -30 10- 4504 - 318 -30 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 06/06/91 - 3,114.84 CHECK REGISTER TREASURER AMOUNT 10- 4286 - 220 -22 50 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 477.68 INDUST RUBBER /SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,337.68 LOVEGREEN IND REPAIRS 130.43 364.16 ASPEN EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 130.43 06/11/91 65.00 412.50 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR U S STANDARD SIGN CO PLASTIC DELINEATR 412.50 1,138.50 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR 23.48 30- 4560 - 782 -78 4617 EARL SONNESYN REIMBURSEMENT 23.48 71.25 RAYMOND GOOD REIMBURSEMENT 71.25 150.00 KEVIN HALL PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 150.00 * 80.00" CAROLYN LONNING PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 80.00 * 150.00 KIM LONGHI PERFORMANCE 6/20/91 150.00 * 110.00 JAMES TOENSING PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 "110.00 * 150.00 KEITH JOHNSON PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 150.00 * 200.00 MARY ELLEN SKEESICK PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 200.00 * 140.00 JAMES TOENSING PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 140.00 * 200.00 GARY VICE PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 200.00 * 65.00 BECKY BROM PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 65.00 * 200.00 KEVIN HALL PERFORMACE 6/30/91 200.00 * 06- 17 -91- PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 26820 4817 10- 4540 - 560 -56 39108A 4427 10- 4542 - 325 -30 15287 3927 10- 4504 - 318 -30 10- 4504 - 318 -30 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 06/06/91 - 3,114.84 HENN CTY TREASURER WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286 - 220 -22 50 3,114.84 * 06/06/91 364.16 LOVEGREEN IND REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 364.16 * 06/11/91 65.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTINGS 27- 4560 - 664 -66 06/11/91 1,138.50 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 30- 4560 - 782 -78 4617 2 * * * -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION, 168732 06/06/91 164.50 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 1,368.00 * 168733 06/06/91 275.00 QUALITY HOUSE INTL CENTRAL SERVICES 275.00 * 168734 06/06/91 65.68 EDINA HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.68 * 168735 06/06/91 60.00 CERAMIC TILE ART COST /GOODS SOLD 60.00 * 168736 06/06/91 92.00 CONT CLAY CO FIXTURES 92.00 * 168737 06/06/91 1,575.00 LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 1,575.00 * 168738 06/06/91 4,767:32 LONSBURY -MILLS LTD SPRING ISSUE 4,767.32 * 16$739 06/06/91 '75.00 LISA LUNGWITZ SERVICES 75.00 * 168740 06/06/91 289.62 TRI STATE INSULTN GENERAL SUPPLIES 289.62 * 168741 06/06/91 75.00 MURAL.LINDQUIST SERVICES 75.00 * 168742 06/06/91 373.00 EMPIRE HOUSE INC REPAIRS 373.00 * 168743 06/06/91 75.20 MPLS HEALTH DEPT PRO SERVICES 75.20 * 168744 06/06/91 56.65 JEFF BOLKS CONT ED 56.65 168745 06/06/91 48.00 HUTCHINSON ELECT GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.00 16$746 06/06/91 89.00 CO -SINES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.00 168747 06/06/91 46.00 AMM AMM MEETING 46.00 168748 06/06/91 1,075.00 MPD INC EQUIP REPALCE 1,075.00 168749 06/06/91 574.47 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 168749 06/06/91 1,208.05 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 168749 06/06/91 1,280.85 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 168749 06/06/91 1,726.60 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 06 -17 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4560 - 783 -78 9999 4985 23- 4802 - 611 -61 51791 4885 23- 4504 - 612 -61 23- 4624 - 613 -61 4555 4880 23 -1330- 000 -00 2503 3271 10- 4901 - 650 -65 935515 4769 10- 4215- 434 -43 487 5152 30- 4224 - 781 -78 28- 4504 - 702 -70 48698 4944 10- 4201- 600 -60 28- 4248 - 702 -70 52302 4799 10- 4201- 420 -42 7010 10- 4202 - 420 -42 12- 4504 - 434 -43 78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 2171 3964 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4901 - 420 -42 2139 4295 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 . 50.- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 3 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE . 168749 06/06/91 2,435.37 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50 -4628- 842 -84 168749 06/06/91 1,989.55 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4628 - 862 -86 168749 06/06/91 458.80 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4630 - 822 -82 168749 06/06/91 666.70 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4630 - 842 -84 168749 06/06/91 413.80 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4630- 862 -86 168749 06/06/91 7.12 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 168749. 06/06/91 34.16 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 168749 06/06/91 23.40 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL FEDERAL EXCISE TAX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10,818.87 168750 06/06/91 1,145.30 BARRETT INC T- SHIRTS 10- 4504 - 621 -62 3970 5151 168750 06/06/91 38.85 BARRETT INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 621 -62 4000 168750 06/11/91 221.40 BARRETT INC T- SHIRTS 10- 4504 - 623 -62 4021 4812 168750 06/11/91 1,876.50 BARRETT INC T- SHIRTS 10- 4504 - 623 -62 4021 4812 168750 06/11/91 32.40 BARRETT INC T- SHIRTS 10- 4504 - 624 -62 4021 3,314.45 168751 06/06/91 114.00 MONSANTO CHEMICALS 27- 4564- 664 -66 4594 114.00 * 168752 06/06/91 270.00 COMMISSIONER OF LICENSE FEES /6 10- 4201- 200 -20 - _270.00 * 168753 06/06/91 31.99 LINDA J MARGL MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 168753 06/06/91 10.53 LINDA J MARGL MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 168753 06/06/91 23.95 LINDA J MARGL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 160 -16 66.47 * 168754 06/06/91 14.00 SUPERINTENDENT OF PACKETS 10- 4204 - 480 -48 14.00 * 168755 06/06/91 35.00 ROBIN MARIE PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 35.00 * 168756 06/06/91 35.00 KATHY FAUST PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 35.00 * 168757 06/06/91 150.00 42ND STREET THEATER PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 30- 4224- 781 -78 150.00 * 16.8758 06/06/91 1,625.00 MPLS CHAMBER PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1,625.00 * 168759 06/06/91 1,600.00 THE NOCTURNES PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 30- 42247781 -78 1,600.00 * 168760 06/06/91 70.00 BOB CONNOLLY PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 70.00 * 168761 06/06/91 70.00 MARILYN HALL PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 70.00 * 168762 06/06/91 100.00 PAT GREER MAY EXHIBIT FEE 30- 3501 - 000 -00 100.00 * 168763 06/06/91 60.00 ELIZABETH SELDEN ARTISIT COMM /MAY 30- 35.01- 000 -00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168764 .06/06/91 168767 06/06/91 168768 06/06/91 168769 06/06/91- 168770 06/06/91 168771 06/06/91 168772 06/06/91 168773 06/06/91 168774 06/10/91 168774 06/10/91 168775 06/10/91 168776 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168778 06/10/91 168779 06/10/91 168780 06/10/91 168781 06/10/91 168782 06/10/91 168783 06/10/91 AMOUNT 60.00 * 47.88 47.88 * 25.00 25.00 * 159.00 159.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 97.80 97.80 * 81.47 81.47 " 137.55 137.55 50.00 50.00 100.00 206.95 206.95 405.00 405.00 " 120.00 120.00 248.00 248.00 60.00 60.00 44.00 44.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CINDY WAKNITZ MILEAGE SUE BLUMBERG TOM SHIRLEY SUE BLUMBERG SUE BLUMBERG CONTECH.CONSTR PROD LOCATOR /MONITOR TRIO SUPPLY CO ACT ELECTRONICS ACT ELECTRONICS FORNEY INC RINKER LANDSCAPING SOCCER EXPRESS USA SCOTT OR ABBIE E MR OR MRS D L DAN G JOHNSON MN FIRE SERVICE MN FIRE SERVICE PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 MILEAGE PERFORMANCE 6/15/91 PERFORMANCE 6/29/91 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIRS SOFT SERV AC ADAPTOR PRINTER CABLE GAGE REPAIRS UNIFORMS /HATS AMBULANCE REFUND AMBULANCE REFUND REPAIRS CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION 06 -17 -91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 41- 4504 - 900 -90 4723 40- 4248 - 801 -80 1514 5114 26- 4624 - 683 -68 152072 10- 4504 - 260 -26 9732 4631 10- 4504 - 260 -26 9811 10- 4504- 260 -26 20442 10- 4248 - 301 -30 10- 4266 - 440 -44 4963 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 4248 - 440 -44 4966 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10.00 * 168784 .06/10/91 5,000.00 WORLD CLASS PROD PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 784 -78 5073 5,000.00 * 168785 06/10/91 125.00 ROBERT SCHEERER PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 784 -78 5239 125.00 * 168786 06/10/91 75.00 ROBERT BURTIS CONT SERV 8/29/91 CL 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 * 168787 06/10/91 250.00 THE BLUE NOTES BAND CONT SERV 8/14/91 CL 30- 4224 - 781 -78 250.00 * 168788 06/10/91 85.00 JIM SCHATTAUER CONT SERV. 8/8/91 CL 30- 4224 - 781 -78 85.00 * - 168789 06/10/91 300.00 MONARCH - CONT SERV 8/28/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 300.00 * 168790 06/10/.91 1,110.00 RIEDEL OMNI RUB PROD RR CROSSING MATERIAL 25- 4900 - 001 -30 L -7359 4628 1,110.00 * 168791 06/10/91 105.46 HUNT TRUCK LINES INC FREIGHT 40-4504-.803-80 105.46 * 168792 06/10/91 901.50 CLH TRAFFIC PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -30 7771 -0 901.50 * 1.68793 06/10/91 200.00 MICHAEL T HANSON TRAINING 10- 4201 - 490 -49 5782 200.00 * 168794 06/10/91 252.90 QUANTUM CLEAN SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 4084 5150 252.90 * 168795 06/10/91 70.00 TC PHOTOCOPY GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 6767 5168 70.00 * 168796 06/10/91 220.54 WILSON ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -62 186682 5147 220.54 * 168797 06/10/91 1,700.00 INSPEC INC FEES 10- 4201 - 647 -64 2190 1,700.00 * 168798 06/10/91 38.00 MN DEPT OF NATURAL PERMIT 10- 4201 - 358 -30 38.00 * 168799 06/10/91 25.00 GLEN PEDERSON DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 25.00 * 168800 06/10/91 155.35 REMARKABLE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 155.35 * 168801 06/11/91 110.00 ELIZABETH MILNE REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 110.00 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168802 06/11/91 168803 06/11/91 168804 06/11/91 168805 06/11/91 168806 06/11/91 168807 06/11/91 168807 06/11/91 168807 06/11/91 16'8808 06/11/91 168808 06/11/91 168809 06/11/91 168810 06/11/91 168811 06/11/91 168812 06/11/91 168813 06/11/91 168814 06/11/91 168815 06/11/91 168816 06/11/91 168817 06/11/91 168818 06/11/91 168819 06/11/91 AMOUNT 36.70 36.70 * 30.00 30.00 * 60.00 60.00 * 38.00 38.00 * 40.76 40.76 * 390.00 390.00 390.00- 390.00 * 1,027.20 1,257.90 2,285.10 * 300.00 300.00 * 65.00 65.00 * 96.60 96.60 * 89.00 89.00 * 43.00 43.00 * 34.00 34.00 * 115.00 115.00 * 81.00 81.00 -* 24.00 24.00 * 12.00 12.00 * 27.00 CHECK REGISTER 06-17-91 PAGE - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LOWELL MCCARTHY GENERAL SUPPLIES JUNE BLUMENSON REFUND MARGARET SORAN REFUND EDINA ART CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES LAURA HINTON MILEAGE LAURA HINTON PETTY CASH LAURA HINTON PETTY CASH LAURA HINTON PETTY CASH ADVANCED ENERGY SERV' CONSTRUCTION ADVANCED ENERGY SERV CONSTRUCTION JOHN MADSON SERVICE _CYBEX REPAIR ..PARTS MIDWEST VENDING WHSL CONCESSIONS JUDITH BROOKS GENERAL SUPPLIES CAROL SAMPSON REFUND' CHARLOTTE CARTER REFUND MICHAEL LASKY REFUND KRISTI BRUNS REFUND ETHAN SINGER REFUND MEGAN FALLON REFUND GORDON WINGER REFUND 7 06-17-91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 624 -62 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4504- 627 -60 10- 4208 - 621 -62 10- 4504 - 624 -62 10- 4540 - 624 -62 10- 4540'- 624 -62 30- 1300 - 000 -00 4421 4749 30 -1300- 000 -00 4420 4292 30- 4201 - 784 -78 30- 4540 - 782 -78 310160 4874 27- 4624 - 663 -66 10- 4504 - .318 -30 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 ' 23- 3500- 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500- 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 7 1991 CITY. OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168820 168821 168822 168823 168824 168825 168826 168827 168828 168829 168830 168831 168832 168833 168834 168835 168836 168837 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 AMOUNT 27.00 * 27.00 27.00 * 53.00 53.00 * 31.00 31.00 * 143,236.44 143,236.44 * 263,671.56 263,671.56 * 7,933.17 7,933.17 * 182,281.78 182,281.78 * 1,099.00 1,099.00 * 1,202.00 1,202.00 * 36.00 36.00 * 300.00 300.00 * 1,300.00 1,300.00 * 210.00 210.00 * 148.75 148.75 * 185.00 185.00 * 812.86 812.86 * 1,089.80 1,089.80 * 3,000.00 3,000.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JULIA CARLIS GEORGE WHITE MATHEW PETERMAN JAMES STEEL CONST CO ALBER CONSTR ARTEKA CORP ADCON INC PROGRESSIVE CONTRACT LAYNE MN POLLY PFEIFER- EDINA POLICE RESERVE CURT KRIENS CONSTR LYNDE CO CERES BOB PRESTRUD JAY JAFFEE MITY- LITES. INC CHASNEY ASSO .REFUND REFUND REFUND PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT SHORTS DONATION CONCRETE DIAMOND DRY CLEAN WOOD CHIPS CONT ED SERVICES TABLES CONSTRUCTION 06 -17-91 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500- 000 -00 60- 2040 - 000 -00 P -4 60- 2040 = 000 -00 91 -9 6072040 - 000 -00 91 -6 60- 2040 - 000 -00 91 -3 60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -13 60- 2040 - 000 -00 91 -2 26- 4262 - 682 -68 30- 4224 - 784 -78 27- 4306 - 664 -66 5173 10- 4563 - 642 -64 55429 5011 10- 4560- 644 -64 474779 5265 10- 4202 - 640 -64 12 -4201- 434 -43 10- 4201- 647 -64 4334 60 -1300- 025 -20 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168838 06/11/91 168839 06/11/91 168840 06/11/91 k R R k k 168A09 06/10/91 R R R R R R 168A21 06/06/91 R * k R R 168A41 06/10/91 168A41 06/10/91 168A42 06/11/91 k k k k * * 168A46 06/11/91 k k R R R R AMBASSADOR FOODS 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/10/91 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/06/91 168A49 06/06/91 R * k R * k 168A57 06/04/91 k R k R R k 168A63 06/04/91 1,100.00 26- 4624 - 683 -68 CHECK REGISTER MEAT AMOUNT 18981 2688 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,375.00 CONSTR MATERIAL PARK BENCHES 1,375.00 * 59788 ADT SECURITY SYS. 1,523.42 k*R -CKS CLARK ENGLER ARCH CONSTRUCTION .1,523.42 * 10- 4262 - 482 -48 AMBASSADOR FOODS 1,100.00 10- 4262 - 520 -52 LEATHER NECK ENTERP GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,100.00 26- 4624 - 683 -68 * MEAT 987.39 18981 2688 ARCH DESIGN AAA 987.39 * * ** -CKS 195.71 30- 4288 - 781 -78 59788 ADT SECURITY SYS. 195.71 k*R -CKS * 10 -4262- 440 -44 73.20 LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 482 -48 AMBASSADOR FOODS 211.96 10- 4262 - 520 -52 AMBASSADOR FOODS 285.16 2689 * 30- 4262 - 782 -78 3,380.00 LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 ARTHUR DICKEY ARCH 3,380.00 50- 4262 - 841 -84 * LAUNDRY 24.35 ACTION MESSENGER 24.35 REPAIRS " 019208 4681 225.48 * ** -CKS AMERICAN LINEN 11.70 AMERICAN LINEN 116.09 AMERICAN LINEN 211.94 AMERICAN LINEN 255.65 AMERICAN LINEN 57.71 AMERICAN LINEN 53.06 AMERICAN LINEN 31.27 AMERICAN LINEN 962.90 324.54 AMMONIA HOUSE 324.54 60.00 ERIC ANDERSON 60.00 LICENSE FEES ALARM SERVICE 06 -17 -91 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 647 -64 4568 60- 1300 - 025 -20 30- 4504 - 781 -78 10- 4310- 560 -56 30- 4304 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS HOT DOGS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 18991 MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 18981 2688 ARCH DESIGN 25- 4924 - 003 -52 * ** -CKS SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 59788 k*R -CKS LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 440 -44 LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 482 -48 LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 663 -66 2689 LAUNDRY 30- 4262 - 782 -78 LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 841 -84 LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 861 -86 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 019208 4681 * ** -CKS REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4201- 420 -42 1991 CITY OF EDINA 27- 4250- 664 -66 CHECK REGISTER * ** -CKS CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT * ** -CKS VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** 168A82 06/11/91 71.27 2690 AT & T TELEPHONE 168A82 06/11/91 2.29 AT & T TELEPHONE 168A82 06/11/91 61.89 AT & T TELEPHONE' 135.45 * 168A83 06/11/91 97.30 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 97.30 * 168A84 06/06/91 10.50 AT &T CONS PROD DIV TELEPHONE 168A84 06/06/91 10.50 AT &T CONS PROD DIV TELEPHONE 21.00 * 1 168A95 06/10/91 52.25 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD CRAFT SUPPLIES 52.25 * 168A96 06/04/91 35.00 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR REPAIRS 35.00 * * * * * ** 168B02 06/06/91 66.50 BFI PORTABLE SERV REFUSE F * k k * 66.50 * 168BO9 06/04/91 717.90 BAILEY NURSERIES BLVD TREES * * * * ** 717.90 168B17 06/10/91 34,233.55 BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACT SERVICE * * * R * k 34,233.55 168622 06/10/91 1,431.45 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 168B22 06/11/91 629.90 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 168B22 06/11/91 1,199.74 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 168B22 06/11/91 1,178.10 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER. 168622 06/04/91 1,926.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 168B22 06/11/91 73.20 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 168B22 06/11/91 75.10 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 6,513.89 168B24 06/10/91 920.00 BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY POPCORN POPPER 920.00 • 168B25 06/04/91 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 06 -17 -91 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4256- 510 -51 10- 4256- 628 -62 30- 4256- 782 -78 10- 4256 - 510 -51 40- 4256 - 801 -80 40- 4256- 801 -80 * ** -CKS 23- 4588- 611 -61 124451 4879 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6995 4837 * ** -CKS 25- 1139 - 000 -00 331906 4670 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 27- 4250- 664 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4560- 644 -64 3935 * ** -CKS 10- 4226- 507 -50 * ** -CKS 27- 4630 - 663 -66 2690 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 25- 1139 - 000 -00 331906 4670 10- 4100 - 430 -42 1991 CITY OF EDINA 06 -17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # 100.00 k k k R R k 168B27 06/11/91 133.35 . 168827 06/11/91 254.63 BERGFORD TRUCKING 168827 06/11/91 271.43 R R k* R k BERGFORD TRUCKING 659.4l.-* 168B30 06/11/91 61.15 168630 06/10/91 3.80 168830 06/10/91 43.79 10- 4516 - 440 -44 168B30 06/10/91 24.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 133.54 * kkkkk k BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 168B35 06/06/91 493.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. „ R R k k R R 30- 4516- 781 -78 493.00 * 168B46 06/04/91 65.06• 168846 06/04/91 29.19 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES ,28- 4504 - 704 -70 94.25 * k R R* k k 168B59 06/06/91 5,928.58 BLMGT LINO /CARPET kkkkk k 10- 4540 - 520 -50 5,928.58 * 168674 06/11/91 380.00 10- 4540- 540 -54 kkkkk k 4736 380.00 * 168678 06/10/91 33.29 * ** -CKS BFI OF MN INC 33.29 25- 4201 - 395 -30 * k k k k k 168882 06/10/91 310.00 168B82 06/06/91 15.00 10- 4248- 646 -64 325.00 * 168883 06/11/91 184.35 * ** -CKS BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC 184.35 * kkkkk k 4665 168894 06/10/91 490.12 CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 11 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 674140 4477 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 676980 5003 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 675950 5003 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 671880 4661 * ** -CKS BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES ,28- 4504 - 704 -70 12765 4551 * ** -CKS BLMGT LINO /CARPET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -50 10599 4514 BLMGT LINO /CARPET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 -54 10633 4736 * ** -CKS BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 25- 4201 - 395 -30 * ** -CKS BRADLEY BENN REPAIRS 10- 4248- 646 -64 * ** -CKS BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 4665 * ** -CKS BRUNSON INSTRUMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 083906 2458 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 083860 2458 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC BALLFIELD LIME 10 -4522- 342 -64 3862 * ** -CKS BUS MACH SALE /SERV IBM SERVICE 10- 4288 - 510 -51 100363 5244 1991 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 122661 4624 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION k * * * * * * ** -CKS 490.12 3067 4559. 168C01 06/06/91 125.65 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD w * * * ** * ** -CKS 125.65 10- 4210 - 140 -14 168C04 06/10/91 908.00 CAMPBELL SPORTS SHIRTS ww *wkw 908.00 - 50- 4630 - 862 -86 168C09 06/11/91 66.20 CARLSON PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 66.20 79034 * * * * *w * ** -CKS . 50- 4248 - 821 -82 50- 4248 - 841 -84 168C25 06/04/91 164.40 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 168C25 06/06/91 128'.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 50- 4632 - 822 -82 292.40 50- 4632- 842 -84 * * * * *w 168C29 06/11/91 128.00 50- 4632 - 862 -86 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.00 * 168C30 06/11/91 205.60 ` CITY BEER BEER 168C30 06/11/91 153.80 CITY BEER BEER 168C30 06/04/91 137.60 CITY BEER BEER M * * k * k 497.00 * 168C34 06/11/91 174.89 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER /LIGHTS 174.89 168C36 06/06/91 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 168C36 06/06/91 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 168C36 06/06/91 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 40.50 * k k k * * 168C44 06/10/91 330.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 168C44 06/11/91 634.99 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 168C44 06/11/91 581.42 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 168C44 06/11/91 1,127.86 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 168C44 06/04/91 603.78 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 3,278.55 * ** -CKS 06 -17 -91 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 122661 4624 * ** -CKS 26- 4262 - 682 -68 3067 4559. * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 643 -64 11248 5271 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 40- 4252 - 900 -90 79034 * ** -CKS . 50- 4248 - 821 -82 50- 4248 - 841 -84 50- 4248 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2691 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 168C51 06/06/91 570.00 570.00 168C62 06/04/91 380.00 * * * * k * 380.00 * 168C64 06/11/91 361.93 168C64 06/11/91 19.22 168C64 06/11/91 156.63 168C64 06/11/91 1,877.15 2,414.93 168C65 06/04/91 48.00 168C65 06/04/91 36.36 84.36 * 168C85 06/10/91 24.80 k * k * k k 24.80 * 168C89 06/06/91 51.70 168C89 06/06/91 78.29 168C89 06/10/91 48.19 168089 06/10/91 165.00 343.18 168C97 06/10/91 678.61 678.61 " 168D05 06/11/91 85.50 * * * * * k 85.50 " 168D15 06/11/91 328.33 k * k k k * 328.33 " 168D19 06/11/91 60.00 k k * * * 60.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN DEPT OF GASOLINE C WAYNE COURTNEY PRO SERVICES SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES SYSCO MINNESOTA GENERAL SUPPLIES SYSCO MINNESOTA CLEANING SYSCO MINNESOTA FOOD CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR WORK CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIRS CULLIGAN SERVICES CUSHMAN,MOTOR CO. PAINT CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES CYLINDER CITY D. C. ANNIS SEWER DALCO CORPORATION DANS REGISTER SERV HYDRAULIC CYLINDER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 * *" -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 27- 4504 - 666 -66 27- 4512 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 10- 4294 - 560 -56 20488 5030 10- 4294 - 560 -56 20430 5029 " ** -CKS 10- 4200 - 482 -48 * * *- -CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 48577 4677 27- 4540 - 664 -66 48611 4801 27- 4540 - 664 -66 48908 5061 30- 4504 - 784 -78 18166 4538 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 31753 4599 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 406089 4767 CKS REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 14 CHECK NO- DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 168D24 06/11/91 18.50 DIANE SANKEY REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 281 -28 168D24 06/11/91 82.66 DIANE SANKEY - GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 168D24 06/11/91 2.43 DIANE SANKEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 103.59 * I%***** * ** -CKS 168D27 06/11/91 281.75 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2693 281.75 * * R R * * R • * *" -CKS 168D29 06/11/91 54.60 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER .50- 4630 - 842 -84 168D29 06/11/91 20.30 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84- 74.90 * * * R * ** -CKS 168D33 06/11/91 267.75 EUGENE DAVIS SERVICES 10- 4201 - 600 -60 168D33 06/11/91 45.38 EUGENE DAVIS MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 313.13 * R * ** -CKS 168D39 06/06/91 159.95. DAYTONS EQUIP REPLACE 12- 4901 - 434 -43 159.95 " * * * * ** * *" -CKS 168D50 06/06/91 176.93 DOYLE LOCK SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 121553 5132 176.93 * * * * R * ** -CKS . 168D52 06/04/91 88.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 85576 88.00 * 168D53 06/10/91 4,373.60 DIAMOND VOGEL TRAFFIC PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -30 181354 3689 4,373.60 * 168D54 06/04/91 100.00 DAVID BLOOD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * " "* -CKS 168D61 06/04/91 100.00 DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * ** " "" -CKS 168D70 06/06/91 911.00 DPC INDUSTRIES POOL CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 682 -68 911.00 * * *R ** * ** -CKS. 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168D80 06/04/91 * k F k F F 168D98 06/06/91 F F k k F F 168E02 06/04/91 F k F F F F 168E14 06/11/91 16BE14 06/04/91 F F k F k R 168E17 06/11/91 168E17 06/06/91 168E17 06/06/91 168E17 06/11/91 168E17 06/06/91 168E17 06/11/91 AMOUNT 37.09 37.09 * 838.80 838.80 * 515.99 515.99 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DALE LUNDGREN REIMBURSEMENT DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE t E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 06 -17 -91 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 784 -78 10- 4156 - 510 -51 5131 40- 4504 - 803 -80 17556 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 93.50 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -62 106786 4860 21,583.00 EARL F. ANDERSON PLAYGROUND EQUIP 60 -1300- 023 -20 106307 4069 21,676.50 EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPLLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 5140 168E51 06/10/91 403.50 EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 5,338.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 12,031.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 10,983.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 183.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 216.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 50 =4632- 842 -84 432.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 29,186.55 Emergency Med Prod Ambulance Supplies 10- 4510 - 440 -44 89139 4959 * F �i * ** -CKS 168E51 06/10/91 134.00 EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPLLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 5140 168E51 06/10/91 403.50 EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 5056 537.50 F F F k F F * ** -CKS 168E71 06/06/91 199.60 ELVIN SAFETY UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 784 -78 4869 199.60iz4-ii• 168E73 6/10/91 24.51 Emergency Med Prod Ambulance Supplies 10- 4510 - 440 -44 89139 4959 24.51* * ** -CKS 168E97 06/10/91 147.14 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 665 -66 100607 4992 147.14 kkFkkF * ** -CKS 168F19 06/04/91 427,443.75 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 10 -1145- 000 -00 168F19 06/04/91 40,975.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 27- 4300 - 661 -66 168F19 06/04/91 74,757.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 27- 4300 - 661 -66 168F19 06/04/91 20,512.00" FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 27- 4300 - 661 -66 168F19 06/04/91 67,600.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 28- 4300 - 701 -70 168F19 06/04/91 .38,625.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 66- 4300 - 000 -00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION R k k * k 669,913.75 168F26 06/11/91 1,841.62 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL REPAIR PARTS R k R R k t 1,841.62 * 168F47 06/06/91 32.86 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS k k k k k k 32.86 * 168G01 06/06/91 776.18 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 168G01 06/06/91 253.68 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 168G01 06/06/91 279.05 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 168G01 06/06/91 231.00 G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES 168G01 06/06/91 125.34 G & K SERVICES _CLEANING LAUNDRY 168G01 06/06/91 20.08 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 168G01 06/06/91 301.45 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 1,986.78 R k R R R R 168G08 06/06/91 1,925.74 G.L. CONTRACTING INC REPAIRS * k R * * R 1,925.74 168613 06/11/91 2,966.02 GARTNER REFRIG INC. REPAIRS 2,966.02 168G14 06/11/91 208.88 GROTH MUSIC SUPPLIES 208.88 168G15 06/11/91 28.00 GEM TAP SERV BEER LINES CLEANED R k R * R 28.00 168G24 06/04/91 797.43 PAT GREER PRO SERVICES 797.43 k k R R R R 168G29 06/04/91 320.00 GENERAL REPAIR SERV REPAIR PARTS k k R t t R 320.00 168G38 06/04/91 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICES 100.00 k * * k k R 06- 17 -91 PAGE '16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.0" # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 4549 4829 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 - 66.164640 2256 * ** -CKS 10- 4262- 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262 - 782 -78 40- 4262- 801 -80 * ** -CKS .40- 4248 - 801 -80 28515 5014 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 005250 5175 10- 4596- 627 -62 27- 4630 - 663 -66 2695 * ** -CKS 30- 4201- 781 -78 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 12227 4759 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO_ DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168G42 06/04/91 319.09 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO k k k* k k 319.09 168G70 06/11/91 193.75 MARGARET GUST GENERAL SUPPLIES kkkkk k 193.75 168G79 06/11/91 8,719.00 GREUPNER -JOE LESSONS kkkkk k 8,719.00 168H03 06/04/91 3,505.92 HYDRO,SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 168H03 06/04/91 109.97' HYDRO SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS kkkkk k 3,615.89 168H09 06/10/91 1,283.36 HALLMAN ENGINE OIL 168H09 06/04/91 204.60 HALLMAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,487.96 k k k * R 168H21 06/11/91 41.24 HARMON GLASS GLASS REPAIR 41.24 168H22 06/04/91 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES kkkkk k 100.00 168H28 06/10/91 947.37 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP HAMMER REPAIR 168H28 06/06/91 14.10 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP HOSE CLAMPS 961.47 kkkkk k 168H34 06/06/91 5,031.78 HENN COUNTY TREAS. WORKHOUSE /JAIL 5,031.78 * k k k* k k 168H38 06/11/91 218.93 HEDBERG AGGREGATES REPAIRS kkkkk k 218.93 * 168H60 06/11/91 17.48 HOBART CORP PARTS 17.48 k k k* x k 06 -17 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 29- 4572 - 722 -72 50902 4973 * ** -CKS 23- 4504 - 613 -61 * ** -CKS 27- 3417- 661 -66 * ** -CKS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3590 2439 40- 4540 - 807 -80 3576 2439 * ** -CKS 10- 4618- 560 -56 110407 4754 30- 4504- 784 -78 110432 4802 kk* -CKS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 5092 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 107300 4933 40- 4540 - 902 -90 44528 5126 10- 4286 - 220 -22 175 *kk -CKS 28- 4248- 704 -70 4818 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 103098 5250 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168H65 06/04/91 100.00 HOFFMAN - WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES * * * * ** 100.00 * 168H74 06/06/91 46.44 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY * * * * ** 46.44 * 168H83 06/11/91 224,000 -00 HRA HRA ADVANCE * ** * ** 224,000.00 168I71 06/06/91 479.00 IDELLES INTER DESN PAINT /LUMBER * * * * ** 479.00 168I99 06/11/91 5,796.85 INDECO REMODEL * * * R * k 5,796.85 168J23 06/11/91 408.50 JR JOHNSON SUP PLANTS k * k k * * 408.50 168J27 06/11/91 62.33 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 168J27 06/11/91 13.86 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 168J27 06/11/91 1,492.37 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 168J27 06/11/91 388.65 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 168J27 06/06/91 72.99 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 168J27 06/11/91 53.81 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 2,084.01 168J35 06/06/91 18.03 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 168J35 06/10/91 26.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 168J35 06/06/91 193.65 JERRYS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 237.68 168J74 06/10/91 29.18 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES * * * * ** 29.18 168J97 06/06/91 8.58 JOANNA FOOTE PHOTO SUPPLIES 168J97 06/06/91 8.22 I JOANNA FOOTE PHOTO DEVE1.?P'TNG 06 -17 -91 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10 -1145- 000 -00 * ** -CKS 30- 4544- 784 -78 249782 * ** -CKS 26- 1300 - 001 -00 * ** -CKS 30 -4Sr, °? -78 25999 4161 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 500 -50 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 600 -60 23- 4504 - 611 -61 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4600- 480 -48 7183 23- 4600 - 611 -61 10777 4884 40- 4504 - 800 -80 6916 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 90483 4983 * ** -CKS 10- 4508- 440 -44 12- 4508 -4` 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 16.80 wxxkkk * ** -CKS 168J99 06/11/91 40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 40.00 k w k w k x * ** -CKS 168K17 06/10/91 138.19 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 131230 2697 168K17 06/10/91 168.85 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 113725 2697 168K17 06/10/91 125.89 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 125132 2697 432.93 * k * * * k * ** -CKS 168K35 06/04/91 28.01 KNOX GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 201155 168K35 06/04/91 35.41 KNOX REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 205018 4821 168K35 06/04/91 43.65 KNOX LUMBER 10- 4540 - 520 -52 200641 4531 168K35 06/04/91 79.79 KNOX LUMBER 10- 4540 - 520 -52 203310 168K35 06/04/91 131.43 KNOX. LUMBER 10- 4540 - 540 -54 127259 4243 16'8K35 06/04/91 21.38 KNOX REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540: 646 -64 205262 4913 168K35 06/06/91 63.82 KNOX SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 664 -66 203608 5138 168K35 06/06/91 156.26 KNOX REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 203541 5055 168K35 06/04/91 50.63 KNOX GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 205251 4976 610.38 * k * k k k * ** -CKS 168K45 06/11/91 140.94 KOKESH ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 621 -62 43252 168K45 06/11/91 154.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC' GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 642 -62 42642 5272 294.94 R kxx *xk ' * ** -CKS 168K57. 06/11/91 2,807.85 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4636- 822 -82 168K57 06/11/91 4,529.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 168K57 06/11/91 36.75 KUETHER DIST. CO.. MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 7,374.30 168L01 06/10/91 811.92 Linda Kozak Professional Service 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 168L01 06/04/91 811.92 LINDA KOZAK PRO SERVICES 30- 4201- 781 -78 8 i-i-9� 1,623.84* xr *x.k * ** -CKS 168L30 06/10/91 1,190.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 17720 5107 1,190.00 k k k* k k " ** -CKS 168L34 06/10/91 22.77 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 664 -66 22.77 k *x *xw * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168L38 06/06/91 * * * * R 168L46 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168L56 06/06/91 168L56 06/10/91 168L56 06/04/91 168L56 06/06/91 168L56 06/06/91 * * * R R * 168L70 06/11/91 * R * * * * 168L97 06/04/91 168M02 06/04/91 168M02 06/04/91 168M02 06/04/91' SANITATION 196.75 168M06 06/11/91 168M07 06/11/91 168M07 06/11/91 168M07 06/06/91 168M07 06/11/91 * * * * ** 168M19 06/11/91 * R * * R R 168M27 06/04/91• 168M27 06/11/91 PHOTO FINISHING 10.75 06 -17 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4562 - 664 -66 13233 4979 * ** -CKS. 27- 4201 - 663 -66 2698 * ** -CKS 10= 4508 - 420 -42 190665 10- 4508 - 440 -44 191940 10- 4508 - 480 -48 191939 10- 4508 - 600 -60 191941 12- 4508 - 434 -43 190666 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30618 1469 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 15454 4839 10- 4534 - 310 -30 15455 4843 10- 4536 - 310 -30 15514 4893 * ** -CKS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 299408 5172 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 27041 4765 10- 4504 - 646 -64 27212 5111 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 576.00" LEITNER COMPANY SOIL 576.00 * 196.75 LIEN INFECTION CON SANITATION 196.75 * 21.17 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 9.10 LINHOFF: PHOTO FINISHING 10.75 LINHOFF -PHOTO PRINTS 21.83 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 9.80 LINHOFF PHOTO PROCESSING 72.65 * 180.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING 180.00 * 100.00 MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES 100.00 246.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOM FOR SWEEPER 363.18 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOMS 94.07 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DRYER 703.25 122.50 METRO SALES INC SUPPLIES 122.50 6,136.30 MARK VII SALES BEER 11,809.35 MARK VII SALES BEER 6,742.10 MARK VII SALES BEER 235.50 MARK VII SALES MIX 24,923.25 104.36 a MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIRS 104.36 " 160.00 MERIT SUPPLY GLOVES 194.25 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 06 -17 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4562 - 664 -66 13233 4979 * ** -CKS. 27- 4201 - 663 -66 2698 * ** -CKS 10= 4508 - 420 -42 190665 10- 4508 - 440 -44 191940 10- 4508 - 480 -48 191939 10- 4508 - 600 -60 191941 12- 4508 - 434 -43 190666 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30618 1469 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 15454 4839 10- 4534 - 310 -30 15455 4843 10- 4536 - 310 -30 15514 4893 * ** -CKS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 299408 5172 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 27041 4765 10- 4504 - 646 -64 27212 5111 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 168M27 06/04/91 160.44. MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 27085 4831 168M27 06/10/91 992.00 MERIT SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 10- 4902 - 500 -50 27126 4948 168M27 06/04/91 498.75 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27146 5002 168M27 06/10/91 486.08 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 784 -78 27217 5150 168M27 06/11/91 1,474.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 27185 5095 168M27 06/04/91 445.12 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 811 -80 27155 4601 4,410.64 " . * ** -CKS 168M29 06/11/91 93:60 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE.COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 168M29 06/11/91 93.60 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBILANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 168M29 06/11/91 93.60- MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBILANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 93.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 168M32 06/11/91 285.87 M,AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 5633 168M32 06/11/91 302.54 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 5660 168M32 06/11/91 317.77 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 5525 16'8M32 06/11/91 585.93 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 5634 1,492.11 " k *k * ** % * ** -CKS 168M35 06/06/91 643.50 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC CHARGE 10- 3095 - 000 -00 643.50 " * "* -CKS 168M42 06/04/91 212.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.' BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 168M42 06/04/91 4,587.45 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 168M42 06/04/91 84.11 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1425 168M42 '06/04/91 433.08 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 5,317.58 * * * * ** " ** -CKS 168M44 06/04/91 475.64 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 4032 4862 475.64 * "" -CKS 168M46 06/10/91 328.16 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 328.16 " R R R R* R " "" -CKS 168M54 06/11/91 15.75 MOORE MEDICAL CORP FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 4478 15.75 * * R k * * k " "" -CKS 168M58 06/10/91 440.00 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 162804 4784 440.00 * a 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168M59 06/11/91 * * * * ** 168M63 06/11/91 168M63 06/04/91 * * * * ** 168M68 06/11/91 168M68 06/11/91 168M73 06/10/91 168M74 06/04/91 * * * * * * 168M80 06/11/91 168M80 06/11/91 168M80 06/11/91 168M80 06/11/91 168M81 06/04/91 168M81 06/04/91 168M81 06/06/91 168M81 06/10/91 168M81 06/10/91 168M81 06/06/91 168M81 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168M85 06/04/91 168M85 06/04/91 168M85 06/11/91 * * * * ** 168N07 06/11/91 * * * * ** 168N16 06/10/91 AMOUNT 55.75 55.75 * 469.59 188.41 658.00 * 6.50 40.86 47.36 * 91.10 91.10 * 541.73 541.73 * 31.00 55.68 15.64 1,862.95 1,965.27 16.80 229.95 146.98 23.73 34.20 15.89 369.22 836.77 9.98 42.17 142.50 194.65 37.50 37.50 16,764.98 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MILSCO ENGINEERING REPAIR PARTS MN. BAR MN. BAR CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR ONE MN. ELEVATOR METRO ELECTRIC MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN, TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MTS NW SOUND NSP MIX MIX PHONE RENTAL PHONE RENTAL SERVICE CONTRACT REPAIRS ADVERTISING AD FOR BID 91 -11 ADVERTISING ADVERTISNING REPAIR PARTS ROLLER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS POWER /LIGHT 06 -17 -91 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540- 646 -64 26254 5043 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 10- 4226 - 440 -44 10- 4226- 440 -44 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 2538 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 050390 10- 4248 - 520 -52 ' 3914 10- 4210- 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 30- 4600- 781 -78 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27 -4540- 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 30- 4540 - 784 -78 1748 186884 4612 185192 4576 193891 5078 194892 4148 195389 5062 177460 3788 194298 5074 10- 4540 - 560 -56 77872 10- 4540 - 560 -56 77906 10- 4540- 646 -64 078135 10- 4540 - 646 -64 93176 5199 10- 4252 - 321 -30 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168N16 06/10/91 2,859.93 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 3,170.11 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 2,479.62 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 971.71 NSP POWER /LIGHT f68N16 06/10/91 46.75 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 1,470.30 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 2,019.91 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 3,241.28 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 562.93 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 122.42 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 2,499.49 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 201.19 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16- 06/10/91 523.25 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 5,865.91 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 211.69 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 6,546.36 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 53.97 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 2,379.98 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 16,139.28 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 634.47 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 114.20 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 585.92 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 938.50 NSP POWER /LIGHT 168N16 06/10/91 517.77 NSP POWER /LIGHT 70,921.92 * * * k k * k 168N22 06/04/91 75.00 NATL GUARDIAN_SYS. ALARM SERVICE k k* k k k 75.00 * 168N31 06/06/91 503.10 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS 503.10 168N40 06/11/91 3,625.00 N LIGHTER PYROTECH FIREWORKS k * * k * * 3,625.00 168N48 06/06/91 72.03 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 72.03 * * * k * k 168N68 06/11/91 237.60 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 168N68 06/06/91 273.24 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 168N68 06/11/91 531.90 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 168N68 06/04/91 187.38 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 1,230.12 06 -17 -91 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4252 - 322 -30 10- 4252 - 330 -30 10- 4252 - 375 -30 10- 4252- 440 -44 10- 4252 - 460 -46 10- 4252 - 520 -52 10- 4252 - 540 -54 10- 4252 - 646 -64 23- 4252 - 612 -61 _26- 4252 - 682 -68 27- 4252 - 662 -66 27- 4252 - 664 -66 27- 4252 - 667 -66 28- 4252 - 702 -70 29- 4252- 722 -72 30- 4252- 782 -78 30- 4252 - 782 -78 40- 4252- 801 -80 40- 4252- 803 -80 41- 4252 - 902 -90 41- 4252- 902 -90 50- 4252 - 821 -82 50- 4252 - 841 -84 50- 4252 - 861 -86 50- 4304 - 841 -84 366466 26- 4624 - 683 -68 39884 3715 10- 4504 - 505 -50 27- 4540 - 664 -66 327270 4986 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 168N82 06/06/91 50.75 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 184680 4313 168N82 06/06/91 59.22 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 184553 3805 168N82 06/06/91 155.31 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 184572 4625 168N82 06/06/91 38.61 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 184778 4883 303.89 " R R R R R R " *" -CKS, 168N99 06/11/91 25.00 NAOMI JOHNSON POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 168N99 06/11/91 12.88 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 168N99 06/11/91 28.50 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 612 -61 168N99 06/11/91 12.39 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -61 168N99 06/11/91 13.16 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61 168N99 06/11/91 68.96 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 160.89 R R,R R R R * "" -CKS 168017 06/10/91 265.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS PRINTER 10- 4504 - 260 -26 140300 4980 168017 06/10/91 36.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES -10- 4504 - 490 -49 140884 168017 06/11/91 23.50 OFFICE PRODUCTS CABLE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 141120 5076 168017 06/10/91 768.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 12- 4902 - 434 -43 140429 4813 168017 06/10/91 51.50 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 140738 168017 06/10/91 13.50 OFFICE PRODUCTS CABLE 40- 4504 - 800 -80 140452 5047 168017 06/10/91 321.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 800 -80 140451 1,478.50 * "" -CKS 168024 06/06/91 493.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 31638 4984 493.00 * - * ** -CKS 168030 06/11/91 270.18 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2701 270.18 * R *RR ** * ** -CKS . 168036 06/04/91 284.82 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 110682 4648 284.82 * 168037 06/11/91 306.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 10- 4562 - 643 -64 306.00 * R * * * ** * ** -CKS 168050 06/10/91 7,200.00 OWENS SERVICE CO BURNER 25- 4924 - 004 -52 56516 4288 7,200.00 * " ** -CKS 168099 06/11/91 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 192.00 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * * * 168P30 06/10/91 168P30 06/11/91 168P30 06/11/91 168P30 06/04/91 * * * * ** 168P35 06/06/91 168P35 06/06/91 168P35 06/06/91 168P35. 06/06/91 168P35 06/06/91 168P35 06/06/91 168P35 06/06/91 2,140.86 168P58 06/06/91 168P78 06/10/91 * * * * ** MILEAGE 168Q20. 06/04/91 168Q20 06/04/91 168Q20 06/04/91 * * * * ** 168Q22 06/11/91 168R13 06/10/91 * * * * ** GENERAL SUPPLIES 168R22 06/06/91 168R22 06/04/91 168R22 06/10/91 168R22 06/10/91 168R22 06/10/91 168R22 06/10/91 06 -17 -91 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4516- 781 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 30- 4516- 784 -78 * ** -CKS 28- 4504-'702 -70 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704-70 62629 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38786 4267 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38787 14434 10- 4540 - 560 -56 50286 4764 * ** -CKS 27- 4600 - 661 -66 023284 5253 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 440 -44 21522 2537 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 01471 1478 01513 01476 1472 01504 5157 4408 5236 5238 5242 5237 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,332.50 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 258.55 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 280.27. PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 269.54 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 2,140.86 115.61 PETERSON- BARBARA MILEAGE 19.75 PETERSON - BARBARA UNIFORMS .89 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.91 PETERSON - BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.26 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.63 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.00 PETERSON - BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 319.05 * 58.69 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.69 * 26.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SHARPENING 26.00 * 71.36 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 4.54 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 124.52 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 200.'42 * 100.95 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 100.95 * 132.00. RADIO INSTALLS RADIO RENTAL 132.00 * 121.9.8 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.89 REM SUPPLIES BLACK MAT 116.64 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 323.50 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 448.52 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 486.51 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 06 -17 -91 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4516- 781 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 30- 4516- 784 -78 * ** -CKS 28- 4504-'702 -70 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704-70 62629 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38786 4267 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38787 14434 10- 4540 - 560 -56 50286 4764 * ** -CKS 27- 4600 - 661 -66 023284 5253 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 440 -44 21522 2537 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 01471 1478 01513 01476 1472 01504 5157 4408 5236 5238 5242 5237 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE k * * * * R 168R33 06/11/91 168R33 06/04/9.1 168R33 06/11/91 168R65 06/04/91 168R65 06/04/91 * * * * ** 16,8R81 06/06/91 * *4 * ** _ 168R83 06/04/91 168R98 6/10/91 168R98 06/04/91 168S07 06/06/91 * * * * ** 168S15 06/10/91 168S25 06/10/91 168S25 06/10/91 168S25 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168S31 06/04/91 168531 06/06/91 168S35 06/06/91 AMOUNT 1,753.04 " 7,316.93 5,182.25 178.25 12,677.43 " 3,844.80 1,958.80 5,803.60 * 81.03 81.03 * 29.56 29.56 * 240.00 96.00 so.0&r' 9.99 9.99 " 25.98 25.98 " 111.00 111.00 94.50 316.50 358.80 242.24 601.04 " 79.90 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION REX DISTR. REX DISTR. REX DISTR. ROLLINS OIL CO ROLLINS OIL CO RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON Roxanne Seidel ROXANNE SEIDEL SPRUCE CO SEARS OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC SUBURBAN PROPANE SUBURBAN PROPANE SOUTHERN VACUUM 06 -17 -91 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. #.P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 * ** -CKS GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 29227 5008 GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 29228 5008 " ** -CKS CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 194224 4882 * ** -CKS Professional Service 30- 4224 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS LAUNDRY 30- 4262 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS, FILTERS 10- 4504- 440 -44 4967 * ** -CKS COOKIES 26- 4624 - 683 -68 9680 4495 COOKIES 27- 4624 - 663 -66 9657 4458 COOKIES 27- 4624- 663 -66 9513 4451 * ** -CKS FUEL 28- 4612- 704 -70 FUEL 28- 4612- 704 -70 * ** -CKS VACUUM REPAIR 50-4248-841-84-4967 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 168545 06/10/91 * * * * ** VENDOR 168S50 06/04/91 * * * * * * 168554 06/11/91 168S72 06/06/91 16,OS72 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168S77 06/10/91 168577 06/04/91 168577 06/04/91 168577 06/04/91 168577 06/04/91 .168S78 06/04/91 168S78 06/11/91 168S78 06/06/91 168S78 06/06/91 168S78 06/06/91 * * * 168S81 06/04/91 168S81 06/04/91 * * * * * * 168S92 06/10/91 * * * * ** 168597 * * * * ** 06/10/91 06 -17 -91 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE **A-CKS 23- 4516 - 611 -61 060311 5082 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * * * -CKS 10- 4572 - 420 -42 205031 5077 10- 4620 - 560 -56 20558 4426 CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 8155 4896 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146303 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146380 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146266 10- 4620 - 560 -56 121844 10- 4540 - 646 -64 4907 10- 4540 - 682 -62 4938 40- 4504 - 801 -80 4838 40- 4540 - 801 -80 43930 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4919 CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 642183 4828 10- 4580 - 560 -56 4824 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 50776 4616 * ** -CKS 40- 4201- 800 -80 10784 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 79.90 30.71 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.71 * 100.00 JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * 242.34 STAR TRIBUNE WANT ADS 242.34 * 32.70 STREICHERS -AMMUNITION 1,099.00 STREICHERS OVERHEAD CONSOLE 1,131.70 615.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK /BODY 24.91 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SWITCH 4.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 69.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK 814.11 57.04 SPS REPAIR PARTS 169.32 SPS REPAIR PARTS 143.65 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.81 SPS REPAIR PARTS 454.72 SPS REPAIR PARTS 922.54 * 108.05 SUN ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 341.00 SUN ELECTRIC EQUIP 449.05 * 124.85 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 124.85 * 17,455.37 SEH PRO ENG SERVICES 17.455.37 * 06 -17 -91 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE **A-CKS 23- 4516 - 611 -61 060311 5082 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * * * -CKS 10- 4572 - 420 -42 205031 5077 10- 4620 - 560 -56 20558 4426 CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 8155 4896 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146303 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146380 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146266 10- 4620 - 560 -56 121844 10- 4540 - 646 -64 4907 10- 4540 - 682 -62 4938 40- 4504 - 801 -80 4838 40- 4540 - 801 -80 43930 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4919 CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 642183 4828 10- 4580 - 560 -56 4824 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 50776 4616 * ** -CKS 40- 4201- 800 -80 10784 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168T02 06/06/91 43.35 TAMARACK GENERAL SUPPLIES * * * * ** 43.35 168T05 06/06/91 687.80 THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER 168T05 06/06/91 70.00 THE PRINT SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES * * * * ** 757.80 168T08 06/06/91 14.97 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 168T08 06/06/91 267.99 TARGET PHOTO SUPPLIES 168T08 06/06/91 41.94 TARGET PHOTO SUPPLIES 168T08 06/11/91 176.67 TARGET SUPPLIES 168T08 06/11/91 12.99 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES * * * * ** 514.56 168TIl 06/04/91 667.52 TESSMAN SEED INC CHEMICALS 168T11 06/04/91 62.25 TESSMAN SEED INC PLANTS 168TIl 06/04/91 40.00 TESSMAN SEED INC TOOLS . 168711 06/04/91 40.00- TESSMAN SEED INC TOOLS 168TIl 06/04/91 40.20 TESSMAN SEED INC TOOLS 769.97 168T13 06/06/91 951.60 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 168T13 06/06/91, 102.51 TOM HORWATH MILEAGE 1,054.11 * * * * ** 168T29 06/06/91 9,944.65 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 9,944.65 • 168T30 06/11/91 16,669.24 THORPE DISTR. BEER 168T30 06/11/91 114.76 THORPE DISTR. MIX 16,784.00 168T42 06/10/91 37.25 TOOLS BY OLSEN REPAIR PARTS 37.25 168T66 06/10/91 2,012.67 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT GENERAL SUPPLIES 168T66 06/10/91 416.04 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 168T66 06/10/91 25.39 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES * * * * ** 2,454.10 06 -17 -91 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 157824 4871 10- 4504 - 628 - 62.16676 4678 40- 4504 - 800 -80 98618 10- 4504- 624 -62 10- 4508- 420 -42 10- 4508 - 440 -44 27- 4504 - 663 -66 27- 4504 - 666 -66 10 -45PS- 644 -64 83737 4501 30 -11• -82 -78 85380 4386 30 -4t)6u- 782 -78 85380 4386 30- 4580 - 782 -78 85380 4386 30- 4580 - 782 -78 85380 4386 10- 4201- 644 -64 10- 4208 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 862 -86 27- 4540- 664 -66 35061 5155 10- 4504 - 624 -62 429605 3783 23- 4588 - 611 -61 432674 4881 23- 4588 - 611 -61 433314 4881 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS' * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 06 -17 -91 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50 -4632- 862 -86 1991 CITY OF EDINA 2531 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168T88 06/11/91 80.66 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX xwxxwx 80.66 28- 4256- 702 -70 29- 4256 - 722 -72 168U25 06/11/91 36.00 40 -4256- 801 -80 i UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN xxxxxx 50 -4256- 861 -86 36.00 * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 640 -64 5100 168U27 06/11/91 65.41 4647 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 3,349..29 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 392.66 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 103.76 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 244.86 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 155.47 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 24.62 US WEST COMM. -TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 433.66 US WEST COMM.- TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 52.42 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 16$U27 06/11/91 201.13 US WEST COMM.- TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 44.86 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 50.58 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 85.02 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 115.31 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 168U27 06/11/91 152.91 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE xwwwxw 5,471 .96 168U30 06/04/91 21.00 US WEST PAGING PAGER 21.00 xxxxx* • 168V20 06/04/91 275.00 VAN WATERS & ROGERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 275.00 168V30 06/06/91 950.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PRO SERVICES 168V30 06/06/91 199.27 VANTAGE ELECTRIC SERVICE CONTRACT xxxwxw 1,149.27 168V45 06/06/91 48.33 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 168V45 06/06/91 48.33 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 16BV45 06/06/91 48.34 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 145.00 * 168V46 06/06/91 23.49 VESSCO REPAIR'PARTS xxxwxx 23.49 * 06 -17 -91 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50 -4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4510- 440 -44 2531 * ** -CKS 10 -4256- 436 -42 10- 4256- 510 -51 10- 4256 - 622 -62 10- 4256 - 628 -62 10- 4256- 646 -64 23- 4256 - 612 -61 26- 4256 - 682 -68 27- 4256 - 662 -66 27- 4256- 664 -66 28- 4256- 702 -70 29- 4256 - 722 -72 30- 4256 - 782 -78 40 -4256- 801 -80 40- 4256 - 803 -80 50 -4256- 861 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 640 -64 5100 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 704 -70 4647 * ** -CKS 30- 4201- 784 -78 11626 5068 30- 4288 - 782 -78 11627 2781 * ** -CKS 50- 4214- 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 40- 4540 - 805 -80 9622 4823 * ** -CKS •1991 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. CHECK REGISTER # CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168W10 06/11/91 73.43 27- 4612 - 664 -66 MERWYN WALKER- MILEAGE 27- 4612- 664 -66 73.43* 4462 27 -4612- 664 -66 168W11 06/11/91 486.38 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 168W11 06/10/91 495.69 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 168W11 06/11/91 499.38 10- 4208- 600 -60 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 168W11 06/10/91 495.69 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 1,977.14 * * * *** 168W15 06/04/91 100.00 4806 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICES 100.00 10- 4100 - 430 -42 168W35 06/11/91 191.68 WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE - 191.68 10- 4504 - 510 -51 4654 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 27- 4504- 664 -66 168W52 06/04/91 100.00 WILLIAM WALSH POLICE SERVICES * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 305 -30 100.00 3162 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 168W76 06/06/91 333.57 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY GOLF PENCILS 333.57 k * R * * 168W92 06/04/91 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERVICES 100.00 168X05 06/04/91 320.00 XEROX CORP COPY MACHINE 168X05 06/06/91 297.80 XEROX CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 617.80 * * * * ** 168Z01 06/10/91 79.10 ZACKS IND CLEANING SUPPLIES 79.10 168Z14 06/10/91 45,430.00 ZIEGLER INC 3 1/2 YD LOADER 45,430.00 867,754.55 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,806.83 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3,313.67 FUND 23 TOTAL .ART CENTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66 27- 4612- 664 -66 787 5133 27- 4612 - 664 -66 780 5053 27- 4612- 664 -66 719 4462 27 -4612- 664 -66 781 5054 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4208- 600 -60 * ** -CKS 10- 4100- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 27- 4516- 661 -66 62617 4806 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS, 10- 4288 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 510 -51 4654 * ** -CKS 27- 4504- 664 -66 8459 5205 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 305 -30 527601 3162 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -91 PAGE 31 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 18,538.58 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 8,921.99 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 162,915.80 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 85,430.55 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 575.64 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 35,569.90 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 51,405.13 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 846.47 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 131,350.95 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 625,530.37 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 38,625.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 2,032,585.43 TOTAL 1 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 168841 06/12/91 104.22 KRISTIN HALE CRAFT SUPPLIES 104.22 * 168842 06/12/91 49.50 TARA CARMICHAEL CRAFT SUPPLIES 49.50 * 168843 06/12/91 37.68 DIANA HEDGES CRAFT SUPPLIES * * * * * 37.68 * 168A11 06/12/91 36.01 ACE SUPPLY TOOLS 36.01 * 168A29 06/12/91 135.49 ALBINSON PRINT CLOTH * * R * 135.49 * 168A67 06/12/91 44.41 AQUA ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.41 * 168814 06/12/91 86.84 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 168B14 06/12/91 58.89 BOYER TRUCK PARTS MOTOR 168814 06/12/91 35.27 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 168614 06/12/91 31.62 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 212.62 * * * * ** 168830 06/12/91 50.57 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.57 * * * * k k 168679 06/12/91 91.20 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 91.20 * * * * ** 168C46 06/12/91 .26.99 COLOR TILE REPAIR PARTS 26.99 * * * * * ** 168C93 06/12/91 279.78 CERT HYD SPEC PARTS * * k * * * 279.78 * 168E02 06/12/91 550.59 E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 06 -17 -91 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P,.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4588 - 611 -61 23- 4588- 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 40- 4580- 801 -80 156301 4731 * ** -CKS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 020593 2457 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 29223 4729 **A-CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 921285 4835 10- 4540 - 560 -56 918784 5027 10- 4540 - 560 -56 920989 4787 10- 4540 - 560 -56 920722 5028 *** -CKS 10- 4516 - 510 -51 675992 * * * - C K S 10- 4504 - 314 -30 4695 **A-CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5026 * *•* -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 88477 4725 ** *_CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 17744 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 550.59 * 34.85 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 34.85 * 360.00 LAHASS PARTS - 360.00 168K09 06/12/91 xxxxxR PRODUCTS 168L04 06/12/91 xxRxxR 286.61 168L28 06/12/91 168L28 06/12/91 168L28 06/12/91 168L28 06/12/91 168L28 06/12/91 168L28 06/12/91 168.L28 06/12/91 R R R R R R * 168L80 06/12/91 x x R R R R 168M27 06/12/91 RxRxRR ` * 168M42 06/12/91 168M42 06/12/91 R R R x R R 168M70 06/12/91 RRxRxR 1,089.48 168M80 06/12/91 xxRxRR 168N21 xxxxxx 06/12/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 550.59 * 34.85 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 34.85 * 360.00 LAHASS PARTS - 360.00 267.01 LAWSON PRODUCTS 259.06 LAWSON PRODUCTS 286.61 LAWSON PRODUCTS 225.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS 391.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS 466.27 LAWSON PRODUCTS 447.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS 2,343.65 * 104.66 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR 104.66 * 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY 495.00 * 1,089.48 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR 6,056.40 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR 7,145.88 * 68.75 MN. CONWAY 68.75 * 100.80 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 100.80 * 27.26 NAPA AUTO PARTS 27.26 * GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PARTS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES PARTS BLACKTOP BLACKTOP RECHG DRY CHEM ADVERTISING REPAIR PARTS 06 -17 -91 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4584 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 14109 4605 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 5025 10- 4504- 322 -30 4507 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4508 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4506 10- 4620 - 560 -56 4491' 40- 4540 - 803 -80 4504 40- 4580- 802 -80 4505 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 643 -64 51102 4836 * ** -CKS 10- 4620- 560 -56 27006 4614. * ** -CKS 10- 4524 - 301 -30 10- 4524 - 314 -30 * ** -CKS 10- 4642- 560 -56 160750 5022 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 1563 -1 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 659915 4780 * ** -CKS 06 -17 -91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. i MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 656636 4737 , 10- 4540 - 560 -56 856870 4855 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 313696 3843 * * * - C K S 10- 4544- 335 -30 0852 -0 4713 * ** -CKS 10 -4504- 314 -30 114341 4739 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4277 * ** -CKS 10- 4580- 301 -30 4770 * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 89129 4600 10- 4610 - 560 -56 88686 4369 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 168R47 06/12/91 168R47 06/12/91 * * * * ** 168517 06/12/91 168527 06/12/91 * * * * ** LUMBER 168531 06/12/91 245.29 168578 06/12/91 * * * * ** 168W21 06/12/91 * * * ** 168W44 06/12/91 168W44 06/12/91 06 -17 -91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. i MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 656636 4737 , 10- 4540 - 560 -56 856870 4855 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 313696 3843 * * * - C K S 10- 4544- 335 -30 0852 -0 4713 * ** -CKS 10 -4504- 314 -30 114341 4739 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4277 * ** -CKS 10- 4580- 301 -30 4770 * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 89129 4600 10- 4610 - 560 -56 88686 4369 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 70.92 ROAD MACHINERY BEARINGS 268.34 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 339.26 86.76 STEWART LUMBER LUMBER 86.76 245.29 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 245.29 358.80 SUBURBAN PROPANE PROPANE 358.80 * 152.53 SPS REPAIR PARTS 152.53 * 222.01 WARNER IND SUPPLY SPRAYER 222.01 * 354.06 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 113.65 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE 467.71 * 12,327.55 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 191.40 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 1,653.32 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 14,172.27 TOTAL 06 -17 -91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. i MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 656636 4737 , 10- 4540 - 560 -56 856870 4855 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 313696 3843 * * * - C K S 10- 4544- 335 -30 0852 -0 4713 * ** -CKS 10 -4504- 314 -30 114341 4739 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4277 * ** -CKS 10- 4580- 301 -30 4770 * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 89129 4600 10- 4610 - 560 -56 88686 4369 * ** -CKS