The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991-07-01_COUNCIL PACKETAGEI DA EDINA HOUSING AND REDZMDPM=r AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 1. 1991 7:00 P.H. ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adopt Commissioners as to HRA items and by the agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine and will be spearate discussion of such items unless requests,, in which case the item will be in its normal sequence on the Agenda. Lon of Consent Agenda Items is made by the Council Members as to Council items. All and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and enacted by one motion. There will be no a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so removed from the Consent Agenda and considered EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVffiDPNKMT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of BRA Meeting.of June 17, 1991 * II. AWARD OF BIDS - Centennial Lakes Condooinims - Special Items * III. PAYMENT OF BRA CLAIMS IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of June 17, 1991 II: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by- Planner -.- Public comment heard: Motion-to- close- hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Ventana Jyland Addition - Lot 2, Block 1, Muir Woods (Contd from 6/17/91) B. Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision - Sign Variance - Arrow Sign Company C. Lot Division - Lots 1. 2 and 3. Block 2, Smisek Addition * D. Set Hearing Date (07/15/91) 1. Preliminary Plat Approval - Ratelle Hill Addition - Lot 5, Block 1. Indian Hills 2. Preliminary Plat Approval - Sever Addition - Part of Tract B. R.L.S 1278 3. Amendments to Zoning Ordinance No. 825 III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. 50th b France Lights * B. Window Replacement - City Hall * C. Service Contract - Vote Tabulators D. Insurance Renewal - General Liability, Workers Compensation and Automobile Liability ' * E. Insurance Renewal - City Property * F: Insuramce- R,emeuaL - Boiler:- sn&Nachiaaaqy- Agenda Edina City Council July 1, 1991 AWARD OF BIDS (Contd) G. Agency Services Summer Issue of "About Town" * H. Tree and Stump Removal * I. Four -Vheel Drive Utility Tractor V. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Report on Crown Vetch at 4404 West 58th Street B. Solid Waste Collection C. Park Board Recommendation - Braemar Golf Course D. Appointments to Community Services Board E. Normandale Advisory Board VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Petition - Curb b Gutter Only - Birchcrest Drive VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 07/01/91: Total $750,011.11 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Thurs July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues July 9 Annual Braemar Inspection Tour Braemar Golf Course Mon July 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Sat Sept 14 Ordinance Codification Discussion 8:00 a.m. Arneson Acres Mon Sept 23 Regular Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING ADD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JUNE 17, 1991 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to adopt BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. . *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JUNE 3. 1991, ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve the ERA Minutes of June 3, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve payment of the following BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 6/17/91, and consisting of two pages totalling, $224,648.67. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 6 P.O. # MESSAGE _182700 06/26/91 14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR BOND PAYMENT /HRA 01- 4302 - 133 -12 14,166.67 « * * * ** *** -CKS 182702 06/26/91 895.00 HAGEN COMP IMPROVEMENT 01- 1390 - 132 -12 12076 394 895.00 * 182703 06/26/91 2,524.31 WALKER PARK CONSULT ENG FEES 01 -1319- 131 -12 66574 2,524.31 * *** -CKS 182706 06/26/91 7,213.11 BLAINE HTG.AIR CENTRUM 01- 1396- 132 -12 7,213.11 " 182707 06/26/91 3,840.79 BRW INC ARCH FEES 01- 1319 - 131 -12 62373 182707 06/26/91 2,554.82 BRW INC ARCH FEES 01- 1319 - 132 -12 62297 182707 06/26/91 806.48 BRW INC ARCH FEES 01 -1319- 132 -12 62292 7,202.09 *.* -CKS 182728 06/26/91 71.97 CELLUALR ONE TELEPHONE 01- 4000 - 134 -12 71.97 *.* -CKS 182738 06/26/91 3,968.55 BRAUN INTEREC ENG FEES 01- 1319 - 131 -12 3533 3,968.55 -CKS i'g02;49 182740 gs 9e; 0i 999.69 I0E66ES ;NTER DEG;GN MEDEQW;P 9!' !a49- 132 - ;2 41' 06/26/91 269.85 IDELLES INTER DESIGN WALLPAPER 01- 1390 - 132 -12 249785 422 269.85* 1,260.45 06/26/91 990.60 Zee Medical Service Med Supplies 01- 1340 - 132 -12 417 990.60* " ** -CKS 182750 06/26/91 4,202.60 SMITH & HAWKINS CHAIRS 01 -1390- 132 -12 415 4,202.60 *** -CKS 182757 06/26/91 34,327.54 TC CONSTRUCTION CO CENTRUM 01 -1390- 132 -12 34,327.54 * 182758 06/26/91 65,550.00 PAGE ELECT CONTR INC PARK LIGHTS 01- 1390 - 132 -12 65,550.00 * 182759 06/26/91 225.00 DONALD LOFTHUS SERVICES 01- 1319 - 132 -12 225.00 * 182760 06/26/91 1,660.00 MERIT EQUIP 01- 1340- 132 -12 27277 409 182760 06/26/91 499.80 MERIT TRASH CONTAINERS 01- 1340 - 132 -12 27125 4977 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 2,159.80 " 182761 06/26/91 909.60 FLOROCK NW INC SUPPLIES 01- 1390 - 132 -12 15034 410 909.60 " 182762 06/26/91 975.00 TIM KLAERS CONSTR PODIUM 01- 1340 - 132 -12 413 975.00 " �.�. en. -CKS 145,651.69 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA 145,651.69 TOTAL TO: HRA REQUEST FOR PURCHASE 0 FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE JULY 1, 1991 AGENDA ITEM HRA II. ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS SPECIALTY ITE2 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. RONCOR CONSTRUCTION 1. $ 5,475.00 2. LAKELAND NURSERY 2. 7,886.00 3. E.F.D. DEVELOPMENT 3. 9,895.00 4. MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE 4. .14,910.00 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: RONCOR CONSTRUCTION GENERAL INFORMATION: The bid is for the "specialty items" provided by the HRA for the Phase 4 Condominium building. Specialty items include landscape trellis, railings, benches, trash receptacles and so forth. Signature The Recommended bid is X within budget MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY•COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 17, 1991 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith, and Mayor Richards. (Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:05 P.M. after the Consent Agenda was adopted.) CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made my Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented with the exception of removal of Item V.A. - Computer and Software for Edina Public Safety. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGUTAR MEETING OF JUNE 3. 1991, AND SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1991 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Jame 3, 1991, and the Special Meeting of June 10, 1991, as presented.. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes., PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB A GUTTER IMPROVENER'P NO. BA -294: BIDS TO BE TAKEN; ORDERING OF PROJECT TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN BIDS ARE PRESENTED Affidavits of Notice,were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman informed the Council that the City had received a petition for curb and gutter with a bituminous overlay on.the existing street at the following locations: Wooddale Ave. from W. 70th St. to Belvidere Lane; West Shore Drive from W. 70th Street to Dunham Drive; ana•Andover Road from Wooddale Avenue to West Shore Drive. Mr. Hoffman referred to a map depicting the property owners who supported the idea of determining the feasibility of the project and also the property owners who had signed a second petition indicating non - support after receiving the public hearing notice. With the exception of two homes on the West Shore /Dunham Drive intersection, no support exists for a project on West Shore Dr. north to Belvidere Lane. On the remainder of the streets, the results are split 50 -50. The proposed project is feasible and consistent with the overall public works goal of curb and gutter which would provide a positive edge for drainage and would help prevent sod damage during snow plowing. If approved, the proposed project is planned for construction in 1991 with assessment to be in 1992 and recommended to be spread over ten years. The assessment ranges from approximately $2,000.00 to $3,000.00 per lot depending on lot size. For corner lots with both front and side yard footage, the assessment would run higher. The City policy is to assess full front yard footage and 1/3 of the sideyard footage. Total cost for the project is estimated at $97,175.68. Proposed assessment is estimated at $25.01 /assessable foot. Several concerns voiced involved the cost estimate on a per foot assessable foot basis. If this is the largest single concern, Council may wish to go through the bidding process to better determine the assessment rate. Mr. Hoffman said it appeared that a $20.00 /assessment foot was acceptable, whereas $25.00 /per foot was not. 0 Letters objecting to the proposed project were received from John F. McGuire, 7104 . W. Shore Dr.; Stan Selvig, 7113 W. Shore Dr.; and John R. and Bernice J. Hacker, 7108 W. Shore Dr. A letter in support of the curb and gutter installation was received from Harold Babb, 4701 W. 70th Street. Public Comment: Joe Pagani, 4520 Dunham,Dr., said he was one of the circulators of the original petition. He clarified that the $20.00 per foot special assessment they had presented to the homeowners was acquired from the City Engineering Department as the cost of the last similar assessed project. He stressed that both West Shore Drive and Wooddale Avenue are heavily travelled residential streets. Bob Hacker, 7108 W. Shore Drive, said upon receipt of the public hearing notice for the proposed project, he and another neighbor who also objected to the project polled neighbors to gain a consensus from the 45 or 46 residents. Of the 40 households contacted, 25 signed the petition rejecting the improvement. Shellie Specter, 7000 W. Shore Dr. commented that because of a dip in the street water collects whenever it rains, the traffic is very heavy and without curb it is impossible to keep a nice looking edge. She said there is a strong need for the improvement to be done. Don Gjevre, 7016 W. Shore Dr. said curb and gutter would be of no benefit to him because his home has a high elevation and storm water runoff is no problem. The street is in good condition and curb and gutter installation could be done when the street needs to be repaired. Dennis Dowd, 7012 W. Shore Dr. said he calculated his assessment spread over 10 years to be about $.90 /day, while real estate taxes paid are approximately $5.00 /day. He said he felt the project merits further investigation as to cost and feasibility. Lucille McClelland, 7109 W. Shore Dr., noted that vehicles speed the greatest on the portion that already has curb and gutter. Additionally, street edges can be kept very neat without curb and gutter. She said she was concerned that property owners with sprinkling systems would incur additional cost and questioned if the improvement would result in increased property taxes. Maurice Taylor, 4516 Andover Rd., observed that vehicles are driven onto his lawn because there is no curb. He said he would be willing to pay the assessment for improvements to make his area look like the rest of Edina. Further, the ponding on the street is dangerous to drive through. Council Comments Member Paulus inquired as to the City's policy on curb and gutter and what the cost would be to obtain bids for the project. Engineer Hoffman explained that current policy is to install curb and gutter when streets are laid to better control storm water drainage and to provide a sharp edge for delineation for snow plowing. The bid process would entail preparation of plans and specifications at an approximate cost of $2,000.00. Member Rice asked if the water ponding on the street could be corrected without the project and if streets with curb and gutter are safer. Engineer Hoffman indicated that asphalt could be removed and the surface could be reshaped to lessen ponding at West Shore Drive and Andover Road. Statistics do not indicate that streets are any safer within curb and gutter; however, a curb helps to keep moving vehicles on the street. Member Rice then asked Mr. Hacker for the reasons the neighbors were opposed to the project. Mr. Hacker responded that cost was that the project was not necessary and had said their lawns nice without curbs. Member Rice commented that he would ne consensus in support of the project before he would support willing to take the next step to obtain bids so,that actual be determined. one factor; many felt could be edged to look ed to see a stronger it; however, he would be assessment costs could Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved it's adoption, subject to final consideration on the proposed project when bids are presented: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR CONCRETE CURB A GUTTER WITH BITUMINOUS STREET OVERLAY - STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -294 e BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specification for the proposed improvement set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sim and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (to be inserted when specifications are prepared) Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Mayor Richards commented that he would not support the project because there was no strong consensus in favor of it and questioned spending the money to go through the exercise of the bid process. Member Kelly said she wanted.the water ponding problem to be addressed when the specifications for bids are prepared. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice Nays: Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PETITION DENIED FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -54 - DEWEY HILL RD FROM DELANEY BLVD TO CAHILL RD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman noted that a petition had been received for a sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Delaney Boulevard on the north side. Staff has been reviewing the City's sidewalk system and does not support the petition as requested. The estimated cost of the project is $22,512.00 and would be funded by state aid gas tax funds. The sidewalk would be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The alignment would be varied to protect existing property features and would be constructed in late 1991. Engineer Hoffman said that the City has constructed a pedestrian system through Lewis Park to connect sidewalks on Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road which both tie into the City's walking system. The position of ten years ago was that a need did not exist to build a parallel concrete sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road when a pathway existed approximately two hundred feet north in Lewis Park. One of the reasons was the cost to maintain sidewalks and paths, including snowplowing. It did not seem cost effective to have the parallel system. The petition received was from Dewey Hill East and Dewey Hill West condominium owners. The existing sidewalk on Dewey Hill Road west of Delaney Boulevard is on the south side of the street, and the appropriate location. If it were'to be continued, it should be on the south side of the street. This walk would then service the abutting property owners in Dewey Hill East_ and West Estates without having to cross the street to use it. Staff has not received any other requests in the past ten years to construct a sidewalk and concluded the need is to serve the residents on the south side of the street. Staff maintains the position that sidewalks are meant to enhance pedestrian safety and, clearly, the south side of the.street is the better alternative. Council Comment In response to Member Smith, Engineer Hoffman said the price of the sidewalk on the south side would be approximately $22,000 and if on the north side would be $4,000 to $5,000 less. The project would include the moving of sprinklers and lights, and some additional berming and retaining walls. Mayor Richards commented that a concern of his is that, if the project was approved on the north side, residents would have to jay walk to use the sidewalk. Member Smith stated the sidewalk on the south side makes sense as it would be A continuation of the existing sidewalk. Public Comment Speaking in favor of the sidewalk being constructed on the north side of Dewey Hill Road were: Dick Reichow, President of Dewey Hill East, 5501 Dewey Hill Road; Vince Lorimer, 5601 Dewey Hill Road; John Kelly, 5601 Dewey Hill Road; Dr. Karl and Ruth Sandt, 5601 Dewey Hill Road; and Dick Langer, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. Comments made in support of sidewalk on the north side were that it would_ be more cost effective and would enhance the Lewis Park property. Objections to construction of the sidewalk on the south side included disruption of the existing sprinkling system, need for a retaining wall, disturbance of mature landscaping and the topography close to Delaney Boulevard. Mayor Richards commented that supporting the expenditure for a parallel sidewalk to the existing path in Lewis Park, by special assessment or with state aid funds, would not be fiscally responsible. Member Smith made a motion to deny the petition requesting a concrete sidewalk (S -54) to be constructed on the north side of Dewey Hill Road from Delaney Boulevard to Cahill Road. Motion was seconded by Mayor Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED TO ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH, 6820 ST. PATRICKS LANE, FOR BUILDING EXPANSION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen advised that St. Patricks Church has applied for a Conditional Use Permit for building expansion. They propose to construct a new entry -drop off on the north side of the existing church served by two new driveways from Valley View Road. Other additions are proposed to the office /educational wing on the southerly part of the building, totalling approximately 6,700 square feet, i.e. administration area, additional office space, music room.. The additions will not add to the seating capacity of the church and will not add to parking demand. The proposed design and materials of the addition would match and complement the existing structure. All additions, and the church itself, will comply with the Zoning Ordinance standards for a church in the R -1 District. The only significant public issue is how storm water from the site is presently handled. Currently, roof drainage is collected in a single 12 inch pipe which discharges on the surface to the south central portion of the site and runs down a steep ravine into the rear yards of homes on Scotia Drive. Staff has asked the church to correct this problem by doing one of the following: 1) Re- direct this runoff directly into the storm sewer system by connecting the on -site pipe to the catch basin in the cul -de -sac of St. Patricks Lane, or 2) In connection with re- roofing that portion of the church, to direct the roof leaders to the north so that runoff will go to existing storm sewers on Valley View Road. Representatives of the church have agreed to both solutions for the storm water system. -- The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the request at its meeting of May 29, 1991, and recommended approval subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Council Comment Member Smith asked how long the problem of storm water run -off at St. Patrick's Church has existed. Engineer Hoffman said it began some 8 -10 years ago with erosion and has become worse over the years. Member Smith mentioned that this is the third conditional use permit request by a church that has brought to light site problems and he was concerned that existing problems are not resolved until a request for a permit is made. He said he also felt the two new curb cuts would be located too close to the adjoining streets. Public Comment Allen Housh, 6120 Scotia Dr., said he was one of the recipients of the stormwater run -off and that the problem has gotten worse since the major addition to the church some years ago which added the 12 inch tile dumping directly into the flood plain which drains towards Scotia Drive. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Housh if he felt the staff recommendations would solve the problem: Mr. Housh said if the 12 inch pipe is connected to the storm sewer system it should greatly alleviate the problem. Rosemary O'Brien, 6909 St. Patricks Lane, asked how this would affect her property and if she would be assessed for any of the storm sewer costs. Engineer Hoffman elaborated that the street is hard surfaced, with curb and gutter, and on a cul-de- sac with an existing storm sewer in place. The cost of connecting the church's on- site system to the catch basin in St. Patricks Lane would be paid by the church as part of their expansion costs. Donald Eyberg, 6600.Dakota Trail, questioned the proposed curb cuts on Valley View Road. They are very close to existing roadways and appear to be awkward as they relate to the church.: Planner Larsen said that, in staff's opinion, the time and level of usage expected would not create a traffic hazard. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that both curb cuts would be one -way inbound only. Passengers would exit vehicles on the left side at the church building. Dan Tideman, Gruders and Associates, St. Cloud, MN, architects for the St. Patrick's Church, explained that they have worked closely with City staff to ensure that the entry drives meet City criteria. The drives have two functions: 1) To drop people off at the front door, and 2) To focus attention on the building upon approach. It is difficult to find the existing entrance to the church now. The new entry /drop off would enhance the sense of welcome and entry that the church would like to portray. In addition, an exterior courtyard to the north has been proposed. He emphasized that the new curb cuts are important to the design of the building. Sally Schaefer, 6124 Scotia Dr., asked for reassurance that the gully and erosion damage that has been caused by the storm water run -off would be corrected. Engineer Hoffman said that would be part of the project. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) Connection of the on -site storm sever pipe to the public system on St. Patrick's Lane and, 2) Proposed new driveways from Valley View Road shall remain one way, in- bound: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to St. Patricks Church, 6820 St. Patrick Lane, Edina, for building expansion. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL CONTINUED TO 711/91 FOR VENTANA JYLAND ADDITION (LOT 2. BLOCK 1. MUIR WOODS) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that-the. subject property is located on the west side of Valley View Road and south of Dakota Trail. The property is a developed single family lot, approximately 4.4 acres in size. An existing house is located in the west- central portion of the lot. The proposed subdivision suggests removing the existing home, and constructing a new public street cul -de -sac which would serve a five lot subdivision, with all new home sites having access to the new street. The five lots would range in size from 27,396 square feet to 38,514 square feet in area. Ordinance No. 804 requires that lots in a proposed subdivision meet the median lot width, lot depth, and lot area for all developed single family lots within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision. There are 60 lots within 500 feet of the subject property. The proposed lots would meet or exceed neighborhood median dimensions as follows: 110 square feet - Median Lot Width 152.5 square feet - Median Lot Depth 18,815 square feet - Median Lot Area The dimensions and area of the lots in the proposed subdivision, following Ordinance No. 804 criteria would exceed neighborhood median sizes in all areas: 188 square feet - Median Lot Width 181 square feet - Median Lot Depth 30,839 square feet - Median Lot Area The subject property is heavily wooded with an inventory of over 500 trees having a caliper dimension of six inches or greater. The site exhibits slope conditions ranging from 20% to 40% over most areas of the site. The only relatively flat area is at the crest of the hill in the vicinity of Lot 22. Impact of development on areas of steep slopes and vegetation would be caused primarily by the proposed construction of the new cul -de -sac street. The proposed grade of the street exceeds City standards of 7 %. The proposed street has sections of 8% and 10% grade. In response to the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the proponents have submitted a revised grading plan at 7% grade and also an alternative plan,with an 8% maximum grade. The 8% grade plan would allow a reduction in the height of some retaining walls, the cul -de -sac would be relatively flat, and it would provide a higher elevation for the home to be developed for Lot 22. Other changes since the Planning Commission hearing are: 1) Plat name has been changed to Jyland Whitney Addition, and 2) Neighborhood lot size calculations have been reviewed by staff resulting in changes to the lot depth on three lots. The median lot depth is now 152.5 feet, down from 165 feet. Originally, Lot 17 required a lot depth variance. Minor adjustments to the lot and the corrected neighborhood median depth eliminated the need for the variance. 3) Developers have submitted a site distance analysis for the new street and an analysis of how storm water would be handled. The reports have been reviewed by the City Engineer who concurs with the findings. At their May 29, 1991, the Community Development and Planning Commission 'recommended preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Final plat approval 2. Developers Agreement covering all public improvements 3. Subdivision dedication 4. Reduction of street grade to 7% maximum 5. A 40 ft. wide conservation easement along Valley View Road. Member Kelly commented that the Planning Commission minutes made reference to the Ratelle property and the Peper property and that it is difficult to consider the proposed subdivision without looking at those properties as well., Planner Larsen explained that the Peper property is immediately west of-the subject property. Access is up Shawnee Circle and through an outlot between two single family lots to the Peper house on the hilltop. At present, there is no proposal to subdivide the property. He pointed out that the outlot abutting the public street shown on the proposed plat under consideration could "provide access for future development of the Peper property. A proposed subdivision of the Ratelle property, located to the north between Dakota and Mohawk Trails, is currently under consideration by the Planning Commission. Planner Larsen mentioned that the developers had pursued a subdivision that would include the Peper property but that did not happen. It is important to not preclude consideration of future development on another property And he did not consider the subdivision under consideration as s etting a precedent. Member Rice questioned the street grades, the purpose of the conservation easement, and the house footprint.on the plat. Planner Larsen said there are streets in the immediate vicinity with steeper grades. Public Works and Public Safety would have no problem working with the 7% grade and the radius of the cul -de -sac. The conservation easement would insure that there would be no clear cutting along Valley View Road. It would also provide a natural screen for the new homes as well as the properties along Valley View Road. All homes would need to meet ordinance requirements as to setback and lot coverage; the house footprints are shown for illustrative purposes only. Presentation by Developers Rick Carlson, Jyland Development, advised that they have been working with the Peytons to develop their property. He briefly explained the original proposal was for six lots; four lots to be accessed from Valley View Road, and the remaining two lots by a private driveway. It took into consideration a potential development of three lots on the Peper property which could be accessed by the public street in the proposed subdivision. After further study of the elevations, it was concluded that • cul -de -sac was the only feasible design for a public road which was preferable to • private driveway because of the owners, safety, width, marketability and potential access to the Peper property. That plan was ruled out for several reasons: l) Desire to create a feel of neighborhood and privacy, 2) Did not want to add three driveways onto Valley View Road because of the safety factor, and 3) Potential tree removal. Mr. Carlson said they proposed the.40 foot conservation easement mainly to create an interior neighborhood and to.preserve the views of the properties across Valley View Road. A third proposal had similar lots layouts to what is being proposed; the difference being that the cul -de -sac was located further down and a private drive served the last three lots. That plan met all requirements of Ordinance No. 804 and the 7% street grade requirement. It was felt that a common drive for three homes was not beneficial and it would .require a steeper grade which would not serve public safety or fire access. The Planning Commission did - approve the subdivision layout as now presented and recommended the 7% grade for the public street. Mr. Carlson said they would like to propose a 8% grade which would mean less loss of trees, less disturbance of the site, less retaining and would still be maintainable. In conclusion, Mr. Carlson observed that in the proposed subdivision the median lot width is 89% above the neighborhood median, median lot depth is 67% above the median, and the median lot area is 80% above median. If approved, it will raise the subsequent neighborhood medians for future development in the area. Michael Gair, McCombs Frank Roose Architects, Inc., presented details on the grade for the public street. He pointed out that at a 7% grade a 12 -14 foot retaining wall would be required from the road grade of the proposed cul -de -sac to.meet grade at the property line. With an 8% grade, a 10 foot retaining wall would be required. The higher grade would allow for more hill top. In either instance, it,would not prohibit access into the Peper property. He explained that site distance from the proposed entrance onto Valley View Road exceeds state standards (30 mph at 200 feet) to both the north and south. Mr. Gair noted that drainage to the southwest would be improved after grading of the site. There would be a 5 /10th acre land reduction from which drainage would flow down to the cul -de -sac and into the City's system and also ,a 50% reduction in hard surfaced area from which drainage would be redirected. The other area of concern was in the northern sector of the property. A collection system would be built into the proposed cul -de -sac street with catch basins. Storm water would also be accumulated in the low area, discharged through the system into another ponding area into a 12 inch pipe and then into the City's system in Valley View Road. Whitney Peyton, proponent, stated that they had worked with neighbors, engineers and developers to create a justifiable development. He noted that some neighbors were concerned about a driveway onto Valley View, and the mass of the proposed houses and their location. Mr. Peyton said what is illustrated is close to what will be built based on today's real estate market. v Public Comment Voicing concerns about the proposed subdivision were: Robert Murray, 7037 Valley View Road; Ernie Micek, 6941 Valley View Road; Robert Perkins, 6906 Dakota Trail; Walter Klus, 7017 Valley View Road; Mary Lou Dasburg, 1 Overholt Pass; Steve Richards, 6804 Dakota Trail; Sydney Rebers, 6919 Dakota Trail; Samuel Wetterlin, 6609 Dakota Trail; Daniel Speigel, 7104 Valley View Road; and Mary Cary, 6908 Dakota Trail. In summary, concerns expressed included the following: 1) Safety concerning vehicles from subdivision entering Valley View Road, 2) Height and material for retaining walls, 3) Too many lots for site because of topography, 4) Change of character of Indian Hills neighborhood, 5) Subdivision should be considered in concert with development of Peper property, and 6) Size and type of homes to be built is unknown. Jim Denovick, builder/developer, advised that he has an option to buy the Peper property and his objective and that of Martin Peper is to keep it as a one -site parcel. They would consider an offer to .buy the tennis court site. Regarding the Peyton subdivision, Mr. Denovick affirmed that an 8% street grade would preserve the top of the hill and less trees would be taken out. Gordon Knudsvig, 6920 Dakota Trail, spoke in support of the proposed subdivision. He agreed there is a need to slow traffic on Valley View Road but the fix is the same whether the subdivision is approved or not. He said he was satisfied with the plans presented and was impressed with the integrity of the Peytons and Jyland Development. Mr. Knudsvig concluded that it is not the Council's duty to try to preserve intangibles that neighbors wish to see in the area., Council Comment /Action Member Smith remarked that two - concerns need to be considered: 1) Retaining walls, and 2) Retention of trees on the site. He concurred with the recommendation the Planning Commission on the 7% grade for the roadway. Mayor Richards commented on the following issues: 1. Character /symmetry of neighborhood - Concerns raised are legitimate; would not support denial of right to _develop the property. 2. Number of lots - Would be open to looking at a four -lot subdivision, but would support some type of development of the property. 3. Retaining walls - Should be determined by private sector versus public sector. 4. Street grade - Would support 7% grade as recommended by Planning Commission. 5. Control of development - Council has recently gone through an exercise on the issue of massing and determined there is no uniformity or consistency on what is right or wrong. Market will decide building footprint. City has controls as to setback and lot coverage. 6. Curb cut on Valley View Road -.One curb cut is reasonable and will not affect' the traffic that exists today. Member Kelly reiterated her concern that the proposed subdivision would set a precedent for the area if approved. She suggested either a planned development for the property or delaying a decisidn until development plans for the Ratelle and Peper properties are brought before the Council. Member Rice concurred that the subdivision will not greatly.impact traffic on Valley View Road. He asked about the proposed building elevations. Mr. Carlson explained that the existing Peyton house is at 943' and their new house would be at 9301. The houses would be rear walkouts and the building pads would vary some in elevation because of the topography. Member Rice said he would defer to the recommendation of the City Engineer as to the street grade., He concluded that it may be helpful to wait for other potential development in the area but the Council could not expect that and he preferred to look only at what is before the Council now. Member Paulus commented that subdivisions.are market driven and not tax driven as some citizens have inferred. We are seeing more massing because Edina's housing stock does not have 'executive' range houses. There will be large houses because of the price being paid for lots of this size. She would consider a four lot subdivision. She expressed concern that there are no existing controls concerning replacement of trees. Member Paulus said she would support the staff's 7% grade recommendation. Mayor Richards summarized that, if preliminary approval is given, concerns such as trees, retaining walls, etc. could be detailed in the developer's agreement. Traffic issues on Valley View Road should be addressed to the Traffic Safety Committee. The question of density /land use has been raised and should be considered, i.e. four lots versus five lots. Bob Carlson, Jyland Development, stated that it was important to stay at the proposed five lots because of the economics. As to retaining walls, they are concerned that everything look natural and that the walls not fail. They propose to use large boulders, with a height limit of 6/7 feet and a 3/4 feet stagger to the next tier. Member Smith made motion to continue the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for the Ventana Jyland Addition (Lot 2, Block 1, Muir hoods) to July 1, 1991, to allow the developers to come back with an alternative four lot development. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - LAND USE REVISIONS - TAX- INCREMENT DISTRICTS CONTINUED TO 8815/91 Motion was made.by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus to continue the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Revisions - Tax Increment Districts to August 5, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE OF 7/1191 SET - APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION (ARROW SIGN COMPANY) Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus to set hearing `date of July 1, 1991, for Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision on Arrow Sign Company. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BID FOR COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE FOR EDINA PUBLIC SAFETY APPROVED. Member Smith said he had asked for this item to be removed from the Consent Agenda so more information could be given on the proposed purchase of a computer and software for Edina Public Safety. Chief Swanson indicated the reason Edina Public Safety is leaving the LOGIS system is primarily a business decision. The history of LOGIS for 1986 to 1991, showed an average budget increase of 31.6 percent, with an actual 24.4 percent increase throughout the period. The most difficult thing was the fact that the City had no control over the increases. The proposal as,recommended would give the City control of the budget on an annual basis. If the experience over the last six years is projected out, the cost savings would be over $340,000.00 projected on a 5% inflation rate. Chief Swanson said the new system would provide the following: 1. Better response,to calls 2. Safety for Police, Fire and Paramedics 3. Revenue enhancement 4. More accountability for employees delivering service 5. Better analysis of operations. Additions over the current LOGIS system would be: 1. Integration, of Public Safety Dispatching 2. Billing system for false alarms and EMS 3. Mapping system for dispatch and analysis 4. Double the number of workstations (all areas of department can use system) 5. Direct connection to State and County (eliminates double entry of data) 6. Fire Department: fire records, hazardous materials system, pre -plan system 7. Control over annual cost increases (guaranteed maintenance rates) Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Computer and Software for Edina Public Safety to recommended low bidder, Integrated Computer Concepts, Inc., at $339,900.00. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS VENTILATION MODIFICATIONS Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for Public Works Ventilation Modifications to recommended second low bidder, Snell Mechanical, Inc., at $42,165.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SENIOR CENTER RELOCATION - AIR CONDITIONING Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for Senior Center Relocation air conditioning to recommended low bidder, Environmental Systems, at $53,800.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SENIOR CENTER RELOCATION - HALLWAY AND DOOR CONSTRUCTION Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for Senior Center Relocation - Hallway and Door Construction to recommended low bidder, Environmental Systems, at $16,500.00 Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF #3 TEE AT BRAE &R GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for reconstruction of #3 tee at Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape Contractors, at $11,821.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR HANDICAP HANDRAILING AT ARNESON ACRES MUSEUM Motion was made by - Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for handicap handrailing for Arneson Acres Museum to recommended low bidder, Minnetonka Iron Works, at $6,960.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BIDS REJECTED FOR INDUSTRIAL FLOOR SWEEPER Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Paulus to reject all bids for an industrial floor sweeper and to re -bid the equipment with a specification change. Motion,carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. REPORT ON CROWN VETCH AT 4404 WEST 58TH STREET GIVEN: MATTER CONTINUED TO 711191 In a report submitted by the Assistant Weed Inspector, he informed Council that City Ordinance No. 1031, Section 2, Sub, (e) declares as a nuisance: All noxious weeds and other Rank Growths of Vegetation, including any grass or weeds standing over one foot high. This Ordinance, in Section 5, Sub. (b), provides that the weed inspector or assistant weed inspector of the City may enter upon property to cut, remove, destroy and eradicate Rank Growths of Vegetation. The Ordinance does not define the word "rank ". However, the dictionary defines "rank" as "growing profusely," and` "strong and offensive", and "indecent or disgusting." The subject Crown Vetch has reached a general height of 24 inches, and is invading neighboring lawns. In the fall it mats down and could become a health and fire hazard. Therefore, staff believes the Crown Vetch to be a "rank growth of vegetation" and a nuisance. Staff recommends the Crown Vetch be cut to, and maintained at, a height of 8 inches. Crown Vetch is spread by underground runners, is an invasive plant and difficult to eradicate. Precautions must be taken to insure its confinement to the intended area. These precautions must be in the form of a metal shield driven at least 10 inches into the ground at the property line or a cultivated strip at least 10 inches deep at the property line. The recommendation is that staff-be directed to give notice to the owner pursuant to the applicable City ordinance to cut and maintain the Crown Vetch at 8 inches, and contain the Crown Vetch by the above or other means. Further, that if the owner does not comply with the above standards, that City staff be directed to cause such compliance under and pursuant to applicable City ordinances.. Diane Lindgren, owner of the property at 4404 W. 58th Street, explained that she had planted the Crown Vetch on 30 percent of her backyard because she found the elevation made mowing, fertilizing, etc. intimidating. During the drought of 1988, the grass burned out. Through conversations with Bachman's and the University of Minnesota she found that the least expensive way to cover the barren slope was to plant Crown Vetch. She paid a landscaper $550.00 to seed the area with Crown Vetch. Ms. Lindgren mentioned that the down side of Crown Vetch is that it takes three years to mature. Pluses of the Vetch are that it is drought resistant, is not an allergen, rodents do not live in it or eat it, and it chokes out weeds. At present, it is 90 percent in, some weeds are evident and it now needs cutting. In response to concerns of the neighbors about resale of homes in the area, Ms. Lindgren noted that one home sold in 6 weeks in 1989 and another in 1990 in 7 weeks - both times the Crown Vetch was not attractive. Ms. Lindgren said the Crown Vetch is now two years old. It will have an uneven moorish effect with pink flowers when mature. She proposed to keep the'Crown Vetch cut to a height of 8 inches in compliance with the Ordinance.. Also, to instabl a metal barrier between her yard and the neighbors' yard to keep the growth from spreading. She had asked advice from the University and from Bachman's and their recommendation was not to cut it any shorter that 8 to 10 inches or it will be threatened. To retard the spread of the Crown Vetch, she had planted day lilies as a border as recommended by the University and Bachman's. Public Comment Speaking in opposition to the Crown Vetch were: Donald Swanson, 4408 W. 58th Street, and Pearl Nelson, 4328 Philbrook Lane. Concerns voiced were that the Crown Vetch is 30 inches or more in height, is a nuisance, will decrease property values, cutting with a weed whip makes it unsightly, must be cut and picked up more during the growing season, City of Edina should set rules to control a' weed like Crown Vetch, day lilies will not control the spread of the Crown Vetch, and eradication is recommended. It was noted that a letter was received in opposition to the Crown Vetch at the subject from Catherine Sheehan, 4308 Philbrook Lane. In response to the Council, Assistant Weed Inspector Davis explained that if an order is issued to cut the Crown Vetch within 7 days, and if it not complied with, the City could cut it with and the cost would be the responsibility of the property owner. If the mowing charge is not paid, it would be added to her property tax assessment. Member Kelly made a motion that the Crown Vetch at 4404 V. 58th Street be cut to a height of 8 inches in compliance with Ordinance No. 1031, and if the property owner does not comply, that City staff be directed to mow the Crown Vetch with the cost charged to the property owner. Member Rice seconded the motion. Following discussion on the motion, the question was called. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus Nays: Rice, Smith, Richards Motion failed. Member Rice then made a motion that the matter be referred to West Suburban Mediation Services. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Following discussion on :the motion, the question was called. Ayes: Kelly, Rice Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion failed. Mayor Richards made a motion to continue the matter to July 1, 1991, to give the property owner at 4404 West 58th Street an opportunity to determine the cost for removal of the Crown Vetch. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 1991, APPROVED Engineer Hoffman briefly reviewed the discussion that occurred at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting on June 11, 1991, concerning items in Section A of the Minutes. Member Kelly made a motion to approve the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes on June 11, 1991. 1. a) To remove parking restrictions on Lakeview Drive; b) To modify the parking restriction on the west side of Sherwood Avenue to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M." and add a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" sign near the vicinity of the "STOP" sign on Sherwood Avenue; c) To remove parking restrictions on the vest side of St. Andrews Avenue; and d) To remove parking restrictions on the vest side of Dalrymple Road from 5608 Dalrymple Road north to Lakeview Drive, and modify restrictions from 5610 Dalrymple Road to South View Lane, to read "NO PARKING MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M." 2) To install a "YIELD" sign on Post Lane southbound to reinforce State law at T- intersections with through traffic and that owners of the lot comply with the Clear View ordinance. 3) To upgrade the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road to a 4 -vay "STOP ", and to acknowledge sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member..Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FEES AND CHARGES ADOPTED Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SETTING PARK b RECREATION DEPARTHM RENTAL FEES AND CHARGES FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES FOR 1991 BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following fees and charges for Centennial Lakes Park, as submitted by the Park Board be approved: Centennial Lakes Centrum Building & Adjacent Areas Weekday Rental Fees Category #1 City of Edina b City Boards /Commissions Salon "A" no /charge Salon "B" n/C Both Salons n/c Centrum Terrace n/c Urban Mall n/c Category 02 City of -Edina b Athletic Associations Salon "A" no /charge Salon "B" n/c Both Salons not available Centrum Terrace $35 /use Urban Mall fee based on use Category 03 Edina Organizations b Pon - Profit Salon "A" $25/hour Salon "B" $25/hour Both Salons not available Centrum Terrace $35 /use Urban Mall fee based on use Category #k4 Edina Organizations 6 School District Salon "A" $25/hour Salon "B" $25/hour Both Salons not available Centrum Terrace $35 /use Urban Mall fee based on use Category #k5 Edinborough Groups & Home Associations Salon "A" no/charge Salon "B" n/c Both Salons not available Centrum Terrace $35 /use Urban Mall fee based on use Category #6 Edina Based b Resident /Business Salon "A" $50 max - 3 hours Salon "B" $50 max - 3 hours Both Salons not available Centrism Terrace $50 /use Urban Mall fee based on'use Category #k7 Pon -Edina Based & Resident Business Salon "A" $75 max - 3 hours Salon "B" $75 may - 3 hours Both Salons not available Centrum Terrace $75 /use Urban Mall fee based on use Centennial Ickes Centrum Building A Adiacent Areas Weekend Evening & Sunday -Day Rental Fees (Evening Rental Period is 6:00 P.M. to 1:00 P.M.) (Sunday Rentals will not begin before noon) Category #1 City of Edina b City Boards /Commissions Salon'"A" no/charge Salon "B" n/c Both Salons n/c Centrum Terrace n/c Category 02 City of Edina & Athletic Associations Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $150 /max - 7 hours Centrum Terrace $35 /use Category 03 Edina Organizations b Pon- Profit Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $200 /max - 7 hours Centrism Terrace $35 /use Category #4 Edina Organizations & School District Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $200 /max - 7 hours Centrism Terrace $35 /use Category #5 Edinborough Groups & Home Associations Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $200 /max - 7 hours Centrism Terrace $25 /use Category #6 Edina Based & Resident /Business Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $350 /max - 7 hours Centrism Terrace $50 /use Category #7 Pon -Edina Based b Resident Business Salon "A" not available Salon "B" not available Both Salons $450 /max - 7 hours Centrism Terrace $75 /use Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted., ADDITIONAL DATA REOUESTED FOR PROPOSED BRAERAR GOLF COURSE IMPROVEONTS Park and Recreation Director Kojetin presented the Park Board's recommendation to approve expenditures for: 1) Architect's feasibility report on Braemar Clubhouse expansion and 2) Replacement of the old maintenance building. After a brief discussion, Mayor Richards said that'the-Council would need a more comprehensive report before taking action on the proposed recommendation. RACCOON CONTROL PROGRAM PRESENTED Assistant Manager Hughes reported that in accordance with the Council's request, staff has solicited a proposal for a raccoon control program in the City. The proposal includes two programs. The first program involves responding to nuisance complaints on a case -by -case basis. Upon receiving a complaint, the contractor would place a live trap on the complainant's property to trap nuisance animals. The cost per successful trapping is $60 /animal. The second program involves a demonstration project which would attempt to reduce population levels in a particular neighborhood. The attached proposal outlines the program which would cost $6,950.00. The program would last for 40 days and would take place in the fall if approved by the Council. The Council should be aware of several issues concerning these programs. First, the programs are not budgeted - costs would be charged to the contingency budget. Second, the relocation of trapped animals is not feasible. Animals would be live trapped, but would be destroyed later. Third, the demonstration project is experimental in nature. The success rate cannot be predicted or the rate at which raccoons repopulate the demonstration area. If the Council wishes to proceed with the demonstration project, the suggestion is that residents of the neighborhood be invited to an information meeting conducted by staff and the contractor. Additionally, Council would need to conduct a hearing prior to authorizing the project. After brief discussion, the consensus was not to use public money for the control of raccoons but to allow residents to handle the problem on an individual basis. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED SETTING PURCHASING POLICY FOR RECYCLED PRODUCTS Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY TO PROMOTE THE USE OF MA'1'FJtTAi Q WITH RECYCLED CONTENT IN MUNICIPALLY FUNDED BUILDING OR REMODELING PROJECTS Whereas,-the Edina City Council wishes to promote the use of products containing recycled materials and thus encourage the development of markets for recyclables; and Whereas, the City of Edina has established a policy to purchase recycled paper for use in all City offices; and Whereas, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners passed Resolution No. 90 -11- 8428-1, requiring cities, in order to be eligible for 80% recycling finding, to adopt comprehensive procurement and specification policies for publicly funded construction and remodeling projects which give reasonable and appropriate consideration to materials with recycled content; Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the Edina City Council adopts the following policy regarding the use'of materials with recycled content in construction or remodeling of municipal buildings: 1. Standards and specifications for products used in construction or remodeling of municipal facilities will not prohibit the use of products with recycled content. 2. All bid specifications for improvements or construction of municipal facilities will contain the following statement: "The City of Edina encourages the use of recycled building materials wherever practical and appropriate, provided the product with recycled content meets the required performance specifications." 3. The City will cooperate with neighboring City, County, and State governments in an effort to develop consistent and effective procurement efforts which promote the use of recycled products in construction materials wherever practical and appropriate. 4. All City departments and agencies will cooperate to. achieve the purposes of this policy and the goal of promoting the use of recycled material. 5. City departments shall forward reports of their activities in'support of this policy to the City Manager of his designee. These reports shall be - incorporated in an annual report to the Clerk of the Hennepin County Board. Adopted this 17th day of June, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED ASSESSING CHARGE FOR WATERMAIN CONNECTION - 6000 ARBOUR LANE The Council was advised that a letter was received from Thomas and Sandra Maloney, 6000 Arbour Lane, requesting that the City assess the charges for connection to the City's Watermain Lateral No. 206, with assessment to be spread over six years at the current rate of-interest., It has been the policy of the City to assess such costs for connection when requested by residents. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge to Watermain No. 206 in the amount of $875.34 to be levied against Lot 4, Block 2, COUNTRYSIDE (PIN 32- 117 -21 -43 -0013) over a six year period at the rate of 9.0 %, payable starting in 1992. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED OPPOSING LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX Mayor Richards recalled that the Local Option Sales Tax had been discussed at the June 3, 1991, meeting and the Special Meeting of June 10, 1991. Member Kelly said she believed that although Edina may not get back one -half cent in . dollars, we will benefit from the services provided by the County if this sales tax option passes. Member Kelly made a motion to support the Resolution in favor of the Local Option Sales Tax. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly Nays: Smith, Richards Abstaining: Paulus, Rice Motion failed. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OPPOSING LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has adopted legislation providing that county boards may vote to enact a local option one -half cent sales tax; and WHEREAS, under this law the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners must vote to implement the local option sales tax in Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has -asked the cities to present a resolution stating their preference on the local option sales tax; and WHEREAS, there has been no projection made as to the impact of potential program cuts if the one -half cent sales tax option is not adopted by Hennepin County; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, given the uncertainty of the impact on the citizens of Edina of the local option sales tax, the Edina City Council would urge the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to not impose the local option one -half cent sales tax. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Abstaining: Rice Resolution Adopted. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING DATES SET Manager Rosland explained that a letter had been received from Mary Anderson, Chair of the Metropolitan Council, that Hennepin County Regional Breakfast Meetings would be held June 25, and July 1, 1991, and encouraged attendance. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 6/17/91 and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $867,754.55, Communications $1,806.83, Art Center $3,313.67, Capital Fund $18,538.58, Swimming Pool Fund $8,921.99, Golf Course Fund $162,915.80, Recreation Center Fund $85,430.55, Gun Range Fund $575.64, Edinborough Park $35,569.90,.Utility Fund $51,405.13, Storm Sewer Utility $846.47, Liquor Dispensary Fund $131,350.95, Construction Fund $625,530.37, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $38,625.00, TOTAL $2,032,585.43 and per pre -list dated 6/17/91 and consisting of 3 pages: General Fund $12,327.55, Art Center $191.40, Utility Fund $1,653.32, TOTAL $14,172.27, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 5/31/91 and consisting of 17 pages: General Fund $223,098.91, Art Center $2,090.03, Capital Fund $319,000.00, Swimming Pool Fund $11.52, Golf Course Fund $10,334.28, Recreation Center Fund $787.60, Gun Range Fund $91.20, Bdinborough Park $382.31, Utility Fund $331.36, Liquor Dispensary Fund $309,242.56, TOTAL $865,369.77. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:55 P.M. City Clerk oe+�,�� o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: JULY 1f 1991 Agenda Item # IL. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PRELIMINARY PLAT To Council APPROVAL - VENTANA JYLAND , LOT 2, BLOCK Action ❑ Motion 1, MUIR WOODS. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion er, Recommendation: Preliminary Plat Approval subject to: 1. Attached Development Agreement 2. Conservation Easement 3. Developers Agreement (Public Improvements) 4. Final Plat Approval 5. Subdivision Dedication and Utility Connection Charges. Info /Background The Council, at its June 17, 1991, meeting, continued this hearing asking for further information on tree loss, retaining walls, and street grades. The Council also asked to see a four lot alternative to the five lot proposal. Attached to this report are a draft Development Agreement and a draft Conservation Easement which have been prepared by, and are recommended by staff. , The conservation easement would protect the existing natural condition of a 40 foot wide strip of land along Valley View Road. The Development Agreement has four main points. First, Outlot A would be subject to an easement for street purposes, so as not to landlock the adjacent Peper property. Second, it specifies a maximum street grade of 7% and requires City Engineer approval of all retaining walls. Third, it requires approval by the City Planner of all trees removed for development of individual lots. Finally, it requires a City approved erosion control plan. It is my understanding that the developers will present alternative development plans containing four lots at the Council meeting. e4 ; cn I> =� O Iry ti •by/ idetl REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item ## II_ B . From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JULY 1, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: B-91-20, AN APPEAL a To Council OF A DECISION BY Action 0 Motion THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS & ADJUSTMENT FOR A SIGN VARIANCE.1 ❑ Resolution ARROW SIGN COMPANY. ❑ 7101 FRANCE AVENUE. Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Uphold the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to deny Arrow sign Company's following requests: Appeal of an administrative decision with respect to the calculation of sign area. Variance to permit an exposed white neon tube (unshielded light source). Info /Background On June 6, 1991, the Edina Board of Appeals and-Adjustments heard and voted to deny the subject variance requests. The Board agreed with staff's decision that the triangular element of the Leisure Lane sign should be included in the total calculation of sign area as defined by the City's_Sign Ordinance No. 451. (i.e. "that area within the marginal lines of the surface which bears the advertisement, or in the case of messages, figures, or symbols attached directly to any part of a building, that area which is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the message, figure or symbol displayed thereon. The stipulated maximum sign area for a freestanding sign refers to a single fact.) The Board also stated that the ordinance definition of "sign area" a should be clarified to alleviate confusion in the future. Staff is currently in the process of recodifying the sign ordinance. All definitions are being reviewed to ensure that they clearly represent the intent of the ordinance. Staff believes the intent of Edina's sign ordinance includes the entire Leisure Lane sign when calculating sign area. The "architectural amenity (triangle)" referred to by the proponent is indeed part of the sign and not "architectural" in nature. LOCATION fa J W 0 z a N a LTHERAN THE j a z z ASTER . ST • W 7O TN � O I ZELTON �RKTQ�IN an MAP ROAD ST. PUBLIC L IeRARY i 1 _ � Yfl#Kj01A1 cii: PARK O W.74 T W I KLA.1 C AVE W ~ 1 f Y cc O - W 75 VARIANCE NUMBER B -91 -20 L 0 C A T 10 N 7101 France. Avenue South REQUEST Appeal of an administrative decision with respect to the calculation of sign area. Variance to permit an unsheilded light source. EDINA PLAN -NING_ DEPARTMENT DRAFT MINUTES B.O.A. JUNE 6, 1991 B -91 -20 Arrow Sign company for Leisure Lane Shops 7101 France Avenue South Requests: - Appeal of an administrative decision with respect to the calculation of sign area - variance to permit an unshielded light source. Ms.. Repya presented her staff report noting the Leisure Lane shopping area is zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District. It is located in the northeast corner of France Avenue and Hazelton Road. Because the building appreciates. two street frontages, the sign ordinance allows two freestanding signs. The first sign may be no larger than 100 square feet. The second sign shall be no greater than one half the area of the first sign. Ms. Repya informed the Board two new freestanding signs have been erected on the site by Arrow Sign Company. The first sign is located in the parking lot on the east end of the property adjacent to Hazelton Road. This sign advertises Ethan Allen Furniture and measures.81 square feet in area. Ms. Repya asked the Board to keep in mind the allowance for a second sign on France Avenue, the sign area may not exceed 40.5 square feet or one half the sign area of the Ethan Allen sign. Continuing, Ms. Repya explained the second sign adjacent to France Avenue advertising Leisure Lane Shops is the subject of this appeal and variance request. Ms.`Repya pointed out the Leisure Lane sign was erected prior to staff receiving the permit application. Arrow Sign Co. felt confident that they had correctly calculated the sign area and did not foresee a problem with receiving the permit. Ms. Repya stated upon review of the sign plan, the entire Planning staff concurred that the sign which Arrow represented as only 4 feet high was actually 7 feet high due to a neon lit triangular element on the' top. Arrow Sign argues that the triangular element should not be included when calculating sign area. However, when regarding the ordinance definition of sign area which includes figures and symbols, as well as the written message, staff considers it imperative to include the triangular element when calculating the area of the subject sign. Ms. Repya concluded when calculating sign area, staff consistently includes logos, shapes and figures as well as the written message. To disregard the triangular element of this sign would be inconsistent with previous sign area decisions and could set an undesirable precedent for future proposals. Staff recommends that the Board uphold -the 70 square foot sign area calculation as well as the order to remove the- triangular element of the sign prior to issuance of a permit. If the Board upholds staff's decision regarding sign area, the triangular element will be removed and there will be no reason to address the variance for the exposed light source. However, if the triangular element remains, staff recommends denial of the variance to allow the exposed neon for the following reasons: Granting this variance would not relieve a hardship situation, - There are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to this sign that do not apply to other similarly zoned properties, - Granting this variance would establish an- undesirable precedence. Mr. Reiter, Arrow Sign and Mr. Al Kempf representing Leisure Lane were present. Mr. Reiter began his presentation by submitting to board members photo's of logo's on signs and photo's of other signs within the City of Edina, and elsewhere. . Mr. Reiter presented to board members letters from other cities indicating their interpretation of our sign ordinance. Mr. Reiter told board members the.exposed triangular neon element on the sign in question was constructed as an architectural element. He stated in his opinion the triangular portion of the sign should not be considered when considering sign area. He concluded by informing the .board his comprehension of the sign ordinance was that the triangular element above the sign message is not calculated when measuring sign area. Mr. Palmer pointed out to Mr. Reiter if the City interpretated the sign ordinance as you indicated you did, the triangular element over the sign message could be any size. Mr. Palmer said that wouldn't make sense. The City wouldn't have any control over size, and in theory a proponent could contend that any part of there sign is an architectural element. Mr. Palmer told Mr. Reiter the-City of Edina carefully considers signage because of the "visual clutter" that could occur if signage is not monitored with close attention. Mr. Palmer concluded interpretation of the ordinance must be consistent and staff has indicated they interpreted the triangular piece above the message as part of the sign. Ms. Repya asked Mr. Reiter to clarify if he considers the triangular piece of the 'sign a logo 'for Leisure Lane._ Mr. Reiter said the triangular element is not a logo, what it represents, and is. carried through into the sign for Ethan Allen, is an architectural statement for the renovated Leisure Lane. He pointed out the architectural theme throughout the newly renovated Leisure Lane is the peaked archways over the entrances /exists . This element has been carried over into the signage. Mrs. Utne asked Mr. Reiter if he read Edina's sign ordinance carefully. Mr Reiter responded that he read the sign ordinance carefully and finds a problem with the language as it relates to the definition of sign area. Mrs. Utne in echoing Mr. Palmers opinion on signage said in approving a variance for a sign there must be a demonstrated hardship. Continuing, Mrs. Utne added as a board we go by the letter of the law and in this instance, in my opinion, there-is no demonstrated hardship.. Mr. Johnson said in his opinion, when he views a freestanding sign, "what you see, is the sign ". He told Mr. Reiter he does not consider the triangle above the message an architectural element. He concluded he believes that that is part of the sign and should be considered when calculating sign area. Mr. Reiter asked the board to note that the sign in question is small and is setback a considerable distance from the street. He reiterated that in all good faith he believed he interpretated the ordinance correctly when calculating sign area. He concluded he contends the triangular piece above the message is an architectural element. Mr. Al Kempf told board members it is the intention of Leisure Lane to comply with the ordinance and to have aesthetically pleasing signage. A lengthy discussion ensued between staff, board members, Mr. Reiter and Mr. Kempf. Confusion occurred when calculating sign area; Ms. Repya explained to all present, that the site in question is allowed two freestanding signs, due to two street frontages. One sign can measure up to 100 sq. ft.. (and in this instance, that sign advertises "Ethan Allen" and measures 80 sq. ft.) . The second sign can be half the size of the first sign, but is not to, exceed 50 sq. ft.. (in this instance, the sign in question is the Leisure Lane sign and measures 70 sq. ft., therefore the Leisure Lane sign should measure 40.5 square feet) Ms. Repya told board members the problem that has occurred is that the "peak" over the Leisure Lane sign was not included by Mr. Reiter when calculating sign area. Ms. Repya said another point that should be considered is the neon tube. Ms. Repya concluded that staff contends that the Leisure Lane sign could remain as an area I.D. sign at 70 square feet .if the neon tube was removed. Ms. Repya cautioned if that were to occur the Ethan Allen sign would have to be reduced to 35 square feet or 1/2 of the Leisure Lane sign. Mr. Reiter asked Ms. Repya why she didn't include the peak on the Ethan Allen sign when she calculated sign area for that sign. Ms. Repya responded the peak is question has open space, unlike Leisure Lane's sign. Mr. Johnson moved to deny the variance request for sign area. Mrs. Utne seconded the motion. Mrs. Utne noted that what we have been talking about this evening appears to be differing opinions about sign area interpretation. She told the proponent they have the right to appeal the board's decision to the Council if the board chooses to deny. Mrs. Faust observed that-the proponent may have a point in that our sign ordnance, as it relates to sign area, could be defined better. Mrs. Utne said we could add a notation to our motion that we are of the opinion, that in respect to sign area; that part of our ordinance may need to be clarified. All board members voted aye, with the recommendation that in respect to sign area there may need to be some clarification; motion carried. EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTIMENTs JUNE 6, 1991 STAFF REPORT B -91 -20 Arrow sign Company for Leisure Lane Shops 7101 France Avenue South 'Zoning:- PCD -3, Planned Commercial District Requests: - Appeal of an administrative decision with respect to the calculation of sign area - variance to permit an unshielded light source The Leisure Lane shopping area is zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District. It is located in the northeast corner of France Avenue and Hazelton Road. Because the building appreciates two street frontages, the sign ordinance allows two freestanding signs. The first sign may be no longer than 100 square feet. The second sign shall be no greater than one half the area of the first sign. Two new freestanding signs have been erected on the site by Arrow Sign Company. The first sign is located in the parking lot on the east end of the property adjacent to Hazelton Road. This sign advertises Ethan Allen Furniture and measures 81 square feet in area. Keeping in mind the allowance for a second sign on France Avenue, the sign area may not exceed405 square feet or one half the sign area of the Ethan Allen sign. The second sign adjacent to France,Avenue advertising Leisure Lane Shops is the subject of this appeal and variance request. The Leisure Lane sign was erected prior to staff receiving the permit application. Mr. Reiter of Arrow Sign Co. felt confident that he had correctly calculated the sign area and did not foresee a problem with receiving the permit. Upon review of the sign plan, the entire Planning staff concurred that the sign which Arrow represented as only 4 feet high was actually 7 feet high due to a neon lit triangular element on the top. Mr. Reiter argues that the triangular element should not be included when calculating sign area. However, when regarding the - ordinance definition of sign area which includes figures and symbols, as well as the written message, staff considers it imperative to include the triangular element when calculating the area of the subject sign. When implementing staff's calculation of sign area, the 40 square foot sign presented by Arrow actually measures 70 square- feet, exceeding the 42 square feet allowed. The proponent was advised that the sign permit could not be issued until the sign was brought into conformance with the ordinance by removing the triangular element. Arrow Sign Company has chosen to challenge staff's calculation of sign area in lieu of bringing the sign into conformance with ordinance requirements. Relative to the variance for an unshielded light source, the triangular element again comes into play. The inset brown triangle is surrounded by a white exposed neon tube. The ordinance requires a shielded light source, thus a variance is required to allow the exposed neon tube. Recommendation: When calculating sign area, staff consistently includes logos, shapes and figures as well as the written message. To disregard the triangular element of this sign would be inconsistent with previous sign area decisions and could set an undesirable precedent for future proposals. Staff recommends that the Board uphold the 70 square foot sign area calculation as well as the order to remove the triangular element of the sign prior to issuance of a permit. If the Board upholds staff's decision regarding sign area, the triangular element will be removed and there will be no reason to address the variance for the exposed light source. However, if the triangular element remains, staff recommends denial of the variance to allow the exposed.neon for the following reasons: Granting this variance would not relieve a hardship situation, There are, not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to this sign that do not apply to other similarly zoned properties, - Granting this variance would establish an undesirable precedence. 13' 3� y� G� 10� SHOP S —I -i 24 —� Tor VIEW _ 10' +F POLE COVE4 ti Sign Co. 10507 W.V. SS tt.8. C "r IO. SSOtl I6171 tl1,-0111 101 CUSTO A ArrAOT" I OATS Or Arrstov,%. r[ASOA DAArr AT I TH92 tS AO ONICt11AL AT �.4 4 _ AAAOr ssd co_ iT ss Im To As Anrnoucm oil W ' OATM COMBO stTNOLrr "a _' G'. i c0mu" or ARMW st0 Co. Sign C 4"34 -61?4 ;; ?1;()7 H- .-vv. 65 N.E. Cf.,dar. Minnesota 55011 _ _._.. ! ETE CUSTOM MADE SIGNS A AWNINGS May 24, 1991 Edina Planning Dept. 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Indentification Sign - Leisure Lane Gentlemen, We are requesting a meeting with the Board of Appeals to clarify the sign ordinance #451, thereby permitting us to obtain a sign permit for the Leisure Lane sign in question. As the ordinance is written, we are allowed a 50 sq. ft. I. D. Sign. Our application for permit is for a 40 sq. ft. sign, at the corner of 71st and France Ave. This sign has an Architectural Amenity (Triangle) mounted to the top of the sign which ties the sign into the building design which also has these peaked shapes. This design should not be counted with square footage of the message of the sign. We will attempt to prove that our interpretation is correct and that we are well within the confines of the Edina Sign Ordinance. Sincerely, N/d it er D ORDINANCE NO. 451 An Ordinance Regulating and Requiring Permits for Signs, and Imposing a Penalty. Section 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordi. nance is to protect and promote the general welfare, health. safety and order within the Village of -- i - through the establishment of a comprehensive and impartial series of standards, regulations and - procedures governing the erection. use and /or display of devices, signs or symbols serving as visual communicative media to persons situated within or upon public rights -of -way or properties. The provisions of this ordinance are intended to encourage creativity, a reasonable degree of freedom of choice, an opportunity for effective communication, and a sense of concern for the visual amenities on the part of those designing, displaying.or otherwise utilizing needed communicative media of the types regulated by this ordinance, while at the same time, assuring that the public is not endangered, annoyed or distracted by the unsafe, disorderly, indiscriminate or unneces- sary use of such communicative facilities. Sec. 2. Definitions. (a) "Accessory Sign" means a sign relating in its subject matter to the premises on which it is located, or to products, accommodations, services or activities on the premises on which it is located. (b) "Accessory Use" means a use which is subordinate to the principal use being made of a parcel of land. Accessory uses are defined in the Zoning Ordinance. (c) "Address Sign" means postal identification numbers only whether written or in numeric form. (d) "Area Identification Sign" means a free - standing sign which identities the name of a neighborhood, a residential subdivision, a multiple residential complex consisting of three or more structures, a shopping center or area, an industrial area, an office complex consisting of three or more structures or any combination of the above that could be termed an area. (e) "Banners and Pennants" means attention - getting devices which resemble flags and are of a non - permanent paper, cloth or plastic -like consistency. (f) "Bench Sign" means a sign which is affixed to a bench at a bus stop. (g) "Church Directional Sign" means a sign which bears the address and /or name of a church and directional arrows pointing to a church location. (h) "Canopy and Marquee" means a rooflike structure projecting over the entrance to a theater, store, etc. (i) "District" refers to a specific zoning district as defined in the Zoning Ordinance. (k) "Governmental Sign" means a sign which is erected by a governmental unit for the purpose of directing or guiding traffic. (1) "Illuminated Sign" means any sign which is illuminated by an artificial light source. (m) "Institutional Sign" means any sign or bulletin board which identifies the name and other characteristics of a public or private institution on the site where the sign is located. (n) "Motion Sign" means any sign which revolves, rotates or has any moving parts. (o) "Nameplate or Identification Sign" means a sign which bears the name and /or address of the occupants of the building. (p) "Non- Accessory Sign" means a sign other than an accessory sign. (q) "Nonconforming Sign" means a sign which lawfully existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance (November 21, 1968) but does not conform to the newly enacted require- ments of this ordinance. (r) "Portable Sign" means a sign so designed as to be movable from one location to another which is not perma- nently attached to the ground or any structure. (s) "Projecting Sign" means any sign, all or any part of which extends over public property more than twelve inches. (t) "Permanent Sign" is any sign which is not a temporary sign. (u) "Roof Sign" means any sign erected upon or projecting above the roof line of a structure to which it is affixed. (v) "Sign" means any letter, word or symbol, device, poster, picture, statuary, reading matter or representation in the nature of an advertisement, announcement, message, or visual communication whether, painted, posted, printed, affixed or constructed, which is displayed outdoors for informational or communicative purposes. (w) "Sign Area" means that area within the marginal lines of the surface which bears the advertisement, or in the case of messages, figures, or symbols attached directly to any part of a building, that area which is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the message, figure or symbol displayed thereon. The stipulated maximum sign area for a free - standing sign refers to a single facing. (x) "Street Frontage" refers to the proximity of a parcel of land to one or more streets. An interior lot has one street frontage and a corner lot two such frontages. 0) "Free-standing Sign" means-a sign which is placed in (y) "Temporary Sign" means a sign which is erected or the ground and not affixed to any part of any structure. displayed for a limited period of time. Such temporary signs 77 - 0 IM,sd101k !,',FAA UNION n� WN -1 Apo 02 M s ILIA 1.,i to 911► /_MaW_\ 1k 11�[r��»• ±JF: DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 26, 1991 LD -91 -4 LOTS 1, 21 AND 3, BLOCK 2 SMISEK ADDITION RON AND SALLY KING 7600 Delaney Boulevard Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject lots have recently been developed with new single family dwellings. The request would adjust the common lot line between Parcel A and B and between Parcel B and C. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. The adjustment will provide side lot lines which better .flow with the orientation of the homes. Commissioner Hale moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Byron seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 26, 1991 LD -91 -4 Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2 Smisek Addition Ron and sally Ring 7600 Delaney Boulevard The subject lots have recently been developed with new single family dwellings. The request would adjust the common lot line between Parcel A and B and between Parcel B and C. The solid lines represent the proposed adjustment. The dashed lines represent the current common lot lines. All 3 lots will continue to conform to all Zoning Ordinance standards, including set backs following adjustment. Recommendation: provide side lot the homes. Staff recommends approval. The adjustment will lines which better flow with the orientation of �o \ X62 03 31 \ \\ 9 T 6. \� �& CAL \s6 MOST S ?ERIY CC`RNEr _ _2i B& \ \ V lk t�STERLY MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3 C �1 N 1 EXIST R � Ic r ST. II RGAJ = oSEMENT _ 11 HOUSE 9 G NC, <e =9B0' o n z _ I I I �i c „ � S89.51.34'W 209.49 SCJTr- L NE uOTLCT ° — ' MOST EASTERLY CORNER CF C'JTLCT i` RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present separate tracts of land: Lot 1, Block 2, SMISEK ADDITION Lot 2, Block 2, SMISEK ADDITION Lot 3, Block 2, SMISEK ADDITION, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and reserving easements of record, together with Outlot B, SMISEK ADDITION, except that part lying westerly of a line running from the northwest corner of Lot 3 to a point on the south line of said Outlot B distant 66.5 feet west of the southwest corner thereof. Subject to an easement over that part of said Lot 3 lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of Lot 2 in said SMISEK ADDITION; thence southeasterly along the easterly line of Lot 2 a distance of 57.54 feet; thence along a tangential curve concave to the west, radius 220.00 feet the south line of SMISEK ADDITION, and there terminating. WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, SMISEK ADDITION, lying northwesterly of a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 distant 30.73 feet northwesterly from the most easterly corner of said Lot 1 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 distant 31.72 feet southeasterly from the most westerly corner of said Lot 2. PARCEL B: That part of SMISEK ADDITION described as follows: Part of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2; That part of Outlot B, lying easterly of a line running from the most westerly corner of said Lot 3, Block 2 to a point on the south line of said Outlot B distant 66.50 feet westerly from the most easterly corner of said Outlot B, hereinafter referred to as Line "A "; which lies between a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 distant 30.73 feet northwesterly from the most easterly corner of said Lot 1 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 distant 31.72 feet southeasterly from the most westerly corner of said Lot 2 a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 2, distant 16.00 feet northwesterly from the most easterly corner of said Lot 2 to a point on said Line "A" -1- distant 16.00 feet southerly from said most westerly corner of Lot 3. PARCEL C: That part of SMISEK ADDITION described as follows: Part of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2; That part of Outlot B, lying easterly of a line running from the most westerly corner of said Lot 3, Block 2 to a point on the south line of said Outlot B distant 66.50 feet westerly from the most easterly corner of said Outlot B, hereinafter referred to as Line "A "; lying southwesterly of a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 2, distant 16.00 feet northwesterly from the most easterly corner of said Lot 2 to a point on said line "A" distant 16.00 feet southerly from said most westerly corner of Lot 3. Subject to an easement over that part of said Lot 3 lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence southeasterly along the easterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 57.54 'feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence along a tangential curve concave to the west, radius 220.00 feet to the south line of SMISEK ADDITION, and there terminating. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the'City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ] COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ] SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 1, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 2nd day of July, 1991. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk -2- REQUEST FOR PURCHASE ° TO: Mayor & City Council FRONt Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 1 July, 1991 AGENDA ITEM Iv.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50th & France Custom Lighting Fixtures Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Appleton Lamplighter 1. $ 12,600.00 2. "Proprietary Item" 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Appleton Lamplighter $ 12,600.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for additional fixtures for the 50th & France Streetscape protect. This purchase will provide for additional fixtures and spare fixtures for long -term maintenance. These fixtures are custom made,for this project and are very e.-,pensive to go back later and crder replacements. This purchase will be funded as part of the project and assessed against the properties at 50th & France. This change is a result of final meetings with architects and owners on the private sector redevelopment that is currently underway. These are proprietary items because competitive quotes are.unavailable due to the custom design of these fixtures. Sign4t re The Recommended bid is within budget not within Public Works - Engineering �.� Kenneth Rosla d City Director A. e ch i' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE r ' a TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members FROM: Susan Wohlrabe VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 27, 1991 AGENDA ITEM IV . s . ITEM DESCRIPTION: EDINA CITY HALT. WINDOW REPLACEMENT Company Amount of Quote or ENd 1. George F. Cook Construction Company 1. $ 99,800 2. Paulco, Inc. 2. $ 99,945 3. Morcon Construction, Inc. 3. $102,326 4. Construction '70, Inc. 4. $120,490 5. Jefferson Construction Company 5. $157,537 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: GEORGE F. COOK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY $ 99,800 GENERAL INFORMATION: This window replacement project includes every window in City Hall. Arthur Dickey Architects, Inc. developed the plans and specifications. The finished product will make a remarkable difference in the efficiency of the building's HVAC system and in employee comfort as well as give a facelift to the building's exterior. Window replacement is in the long -range capital plan, and 1991 is the designated year for completion of the project. Signature The Recommended bid is MAO ri I t -•. i —X — within budget not Kenneth . Roslantt City Manag)k .C. 4,91�11'L A. ' �1 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: JUNE 27, 1991 AGENDA ITEM IV . C ITEM DESCRIPTION: SERVICE CONTRACT - VOTE TABULATORS Company Amount of Quote or Bid BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION 1, $9,430.00 for on -site 2. (sole provider) 2, preventative maintanance 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION $9,430.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: See attached memorandum for background information, recommendation and funding. Signature The Recommended bid is A( - within budget not Kenneth Administration /Elections Cal.. . 6A Wallin, F ance Director City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: KEN ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: SERVICE CONTRACT - VOTE TABULATORS DATE: JUNE 26, 1991 Our current service contract on the City's OPTECH III -P Vote Tabulators with Business Records Corporation (BRC) was a two -year contract running to 7/1/91 for a total cost of $4,485.00. It provided for two on -site preventative maintenance inspections, labor and parts, back -up equipment for elections, and hardware enhancement. We have received excellent service under the contract and have had minimal equipment problems (most were due to improper insertion of ballots by voters). BRC is again offering a two -year service contract with several options (see attached): Hardware /Labor /BRC Site: Hardware /Labor /On -Site: Hardware /Labor & Parts /BRC Site: Hardware /Labor & Parts /On -Site: $370 per /tabulator x 23 units — $8,510 $410 per /tabulator x 23 units — $9,430 $460 per /tabulator x 23 units — $10,580 $500 per /tabulator x 23 units — $11,500 The current service contract did not include replacement /labor for the lithium batteries in' the prom packs (these hold the vote totals). These should be replaced each four years. Our equipment was purchased prior to the 1988 elections and battery replacement is due prior to the 1992 elections. The.cost for battery replacement was approximately $75 per prom pack ($75 x 46 proms — $3,450). Election law requires duplicate proms. Replacement /labor for the lithium batteries will now be included in the service contract. Battery replacement is labor intensive because they must be precisely soldered in place, etc. I would recommend the service contract option of Hardware /Labor /On -Site (without parts) for a total cost of $9,430.00 for these reasons: 1. It would not be cost effective to have a staff person and van transport to BRC -Site and then return for pick -up after equipment is serviced. Cost, time and packing materials to pack equipment for shipment via common carrier would also not be cost effective.- 2. I feel we can risk the cost of replacement parts over the next two years for the cost difference of $2,070 even though failure of a major part such as a CPU board would cost $480. L61, r a� Memorandum June 26, 1991 Page 2 3. I believe it imperative to have the vote tabulators under a service contract to protect the City's capital investment and to ensure that on election day the equipment will perform. 4. If service contract maintenance is dropped, a charge must be paid before vote tabulators will be put back under maintenance. Because the cost of the service contract for the next two years is a substantial increase over the 1988 contract, funding as follows is suggested: $ 2,215.00 1991 Election Budget 2,500.00 Contingencies 4,715.00 (1/2 billed to School District) ;� 7,4.)V.VV BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION Optech III -P Hardware Optech W -P Hardware Optech HI -P Hardware Optech HI -P Eagle Hardware Optech M -P Eagle Hardware Optech Ill -P Eagle Hardware As part of its continuing service plan to BRC election customers. BRC As part of its continuing service plan to BRC election customers, BRC hardware maintenance plans. These plans are tailored tr As part of its continuing service plan to BRC election customers. BRC offers several hardware maintenance plans. These plans are tailored to within BRC. offers several the variety of customer needs within BRC. offers several hardware maintenance plans. These plans are tailored to meet the variety of customer needs meet meet the variery of customer needs within•BRC. Hardware/ Labor /On -Site Hardware /Labor & Parts /BRC -Site Hardware /Labor /BRC-Site dust have to or more units Two preventive maintenance inspections a[ client site Two preventive maintenance inspections at BRC site • Two preventive maintenance inspections at BRC site - • Client determines what year (s) inspections occur Client determines what year (s) inspections occur • Client determines what year (s) inspections occur . Problem analysis - Problem analysis Problem analysis Modificarion and upgrades to Optech units as determined by Modification and upgrades to units as determined by • Modificarioa and upgrades to Optech units as determined by . BRC (ex. engineering changes . stickers) -stick BRC (ex. engineering changes - stickers) BRC (x. BRC (ex. engineering changes - stickers) All labor. including travel time , All labor -Full service - covers all work performed • All labor - full service - covers all work performed (no pans) • Full service - covers all work performed (no parts) All parts. excluding ribbons, batteries, other consumables g • BRC will provide loaner units for equipment failing to operate through fault of BRC within N hours - BRC will provide loaner units for equipment failing to of ' BRC will provide loaner units for equipment failing to operate through fault of BRC within 24 hours through fault of BRC within -t hours • Access to back -up units for election night Access to back -up units for election night Access to back -up units for election night • Replacement of lithium batteries in prom packs - client pays for battery Replacement of lithium battery in prom packs - c5en[ pays for Replacement of lithium batteries in prom packs •client pays for battery • BRC will automatically replace batteries that are over 42 months old, unless client requests otherwise battery BRC 11 automatically replace batteries that are over 42 BRC will automatically replace batteries that are over 42 months old. unless ciient requests otherwise months old, unless client requests otherwise • Batteries must be.replaced depot, only - client will send prom to BRC Batteries must be replaced depot, only • client will send prom Pack atteries must be replaced depot, only - client will send prom pack pack to BRC a BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION Optech HIT Hardware Optech HI -P Eagle Hardware As part of its continuing service plan to BRC election customers. BRC offers several hardware maintenance plans. These plans are tailored to meet the variety of customer needs within BRC. Hardware /Labor & Parts/On -Site • Must have 10 or more units Two preventive maintenance inspections at client site • Client determines what year (s) inspections occur Problem analysis Modification and upgrades to Optech units as determined by BRC (ex. engineering changes . stickers) All labor, including travel time Full service - covers all work performed All parts, excluding ribbons. batteries, other consumables BRC will provide loaner units for equipment failing to operate through fault of BRC within 24 hours Access to back -up units for election oight • Replacement of lithium batteries in prom packs - client pays for battery BRC will automatically replace batteries that are over 42 months old, unless dient requests otherwise Batteries must be replaced depot, only - client will send prom pack to BRC 1 A. k 9S�1j.�'i o e , r (nil REQUEST FOR PURCHASE O. TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE JULY 1, 1991 AGENDA ITEM Iv. D . ITEM DESCRIPTION: WORKERS' COMPENSATION, GENERAL LIABILITY AND Company AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSL &gOf Quote or Bid 1. Penco - Harris Homeyer 1. $ 489,073.00 2. LMCT - Harris Homeyer 2. 522,537.00 3. HOME Insurance - Harris Homeyer 3. 565,928.00 4. LMCT - Harris Homeyer 4. 648,374.00 5. Cigna - Marsh McLennan 5. 841,069.00 6. Cigna - Marsh McLennan (first quote) 6. $1,054,172.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: HOME Insurance - $565,928.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: See attached Signature The Recommended bid is 1 — within budget not Kenneth (over) Administration City Manager Director 14 i .y Report /Recommendation /Workers' Compensation, General Liability, Automobile Liability Insurance July 1, 1991 Page 2 Preparation of quotations for the City's Workers' Compensation, General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance began in April. Two brokers have worked on behalf of the City to secure the quotes being presented. Bill Homeyer has prepared the quotations for the Harris Homeyer Co., and Tony Becker and Judy Morgan prepared the quotations for Marsh & McLennan (the world's largest insurance broker). The background work done in preparation of these quotations, was extensive and included a review of the past five years City budgets, financial statements, loss runs and numerous site inspections by the various insurance companies. Staff also spent time with each broker reviewing and answering questions that were generated as a result of working with the aforementioned materials. Marsh & McLennan representing Cigna worked very hard to provide a competitive quotation, but were very uncomfortable with the first quote of $1,054,172.00. Subsequently; the broker asked that Cigna resubmit a second quote which was still not competitive at $841,069.00. Staff is recommending Home Insurance Companies' quotation of .$565,928.00. The recommendation is being based on the fact that the actual premium costs with Home Insurance, when based on incurred losses, would be the lowest. The attached Appendix illustrates premium based on the City's losses for the years,, 1986 - 1990. The insurance program proposed by Home is a continuation of the retrospectively rated program the City is currently using. With this type of program, premium is based on actual incurred losses. The City has had substantial return of deposit premium in the past four years using this type of insurance plan. This year, once again, the City is fortunate in that it has received a return of a retro adjustment in the amount of $274,963.00. Bill Homeyer will be present at the City Council Meeting on July 1, 1991. He is prepared to answer questions regarding the quotations that he is providing the City on behalf of Home Insurance, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust and Penco, Co. CITY OF ED INA Comparing Auto, GL, Work -Comp & Liquor Quote 7 -1 -91 POLICY YEAR DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CLAIMS ACTUAL PREMIUM AT PREVIOUS YEARS CLAIM AMOUNTS HOME LEAGUE (#2) PENCO. 86 94,426. 331,800. 448,954. 432,683 , '87 186,634. 456,155. 550,279. 536,318 '88 168,176. 431,262. 526,382. 516,918 189 183,769. 452,291. 541,840. 525,318 '90 (9 Months) 252,521. 545,013. 628,920. 610,807 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: JULY 1, 1991 AGENDA ITEM IV. E . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Insurance Renewal - City Property Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. National Union Fire - American Agency 1. $ 25,174.00 2. St. Paul Companies - Frank B. Hall 2. 34,081.00 3. Safeco - Frank B. Hall 3. 35,930.00 4. Hartford - Frank B. Hall 4. 38,614.00 5. Fireman's Fund - Twin City Group 5• 39,171.00 6. Affiliated - Frank B. Hall 41,201.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hartford Insurance Company — $38,614.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: See attached. r V Signature The Recommended bid is x within budget not (over) Rosland c Director Report /Recommendation /City Property Insurance July 1, 1991 Page 2 Three insurance brokers sought quotes for the City's Property Insurance. The agents were Dave Seppelt of the American Agency, Jack Carroll of Frank B. Hall, and Jim Fee of the Twin City Group. Staff is recommending that Hartford Insurance Company in the amount of $38,614.00. Two of the lower quotes have deductibles of $5,000.00 while The Hartford quote includes a $1,000.00 deductible. The only lower quote with the $1,000.00 deductible has a recommendation from the carrier that would require work that would have to be done at the City's expense within 30 days of the installation of the policy. The additional expense plus the quoted premium could run higher than the quotation•that the staff is recommending. The Hartford Insurance Company is the incumbent property insurance carrier. They have provided excellent service to the City for the past 5 years. A. ° k � (W REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE JULY 1, 1991 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Companv AGENDA ITEM IV. F. BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE Amount of Quote or Bid 1. TRAVELERS INSURANCE - BHK &R 2. CHUBB GROUP - FRANK B. HALL 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: TRAVELERS - $7,359.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. $ 7, 359.00 2. 8,100.00 3. 4. 5. Bill Brandow from Brandow Howard Kohler & Rosenbloom, Inc., has secured the low quote for the Boiler & Machinery Insurance coverage. Traveler's is the current carrier of this coverage for the City. The Recommended bid is x within budget Department N' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph Campbell, Director of Communications VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 27 June 1991 AGENDA ITEM Iy•� ITEM DESCRIPTION. AGENCY SERVICES - SUMMER ISSUE OF ABOUT TOWN Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Lonsbury- Mills, Ltd. 1. 2. 2. $15,915.00 3. 3. 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Lonsbury - Mills, Ltd. $15,915.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Agency costs, including printing, for "About Town" magazine. All costs and revenues.associated with the production and distribution of "About Town" magazine are as described in the 12 April 1991 memorandum entitled "ABOUT TOWN- -STATE OF THE MAGAZINE REPORT ". Overall costs continue to decrease. 9 The Recommended bid is xx within budget not withip buMei Kenneth Rosland City allin, F�fince Director LONSBURY - MILLS, LTD S REMIT TO: Lonsbury- Mills, Ltd.. Account Receivable,Dept. 7157 Shady Oak Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 City of Edina Attn: Ralph Campbell 4801 West 30th Street Edina, MN 55424 In Invoice Number 500 Invoice Date 06/25/91 Payment Due 07/03/91 Project No. 2494 PROJECT: Summer 1991 Issue Edina City Magazine - About Town 30 pages, 2 /Color, 24,500 copies SERVICES: Project Planning and Service Copy Preparation & Editing Layout and Design Keylining Type & Alterations Production (Stats, Proofing, Coordination) Printing 24,000 Copies Paper, Printing Analysis & Estimating TOTAL AMOUNT (Less Ad Revenue Discount) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 3100.00 900.00 2500.00 725.00 1925.00 875.00 6820.00 275.00 $17,120.00 (1,205.00) $15,915.00 Thank you! A 1 1/29 Late Fee Will Be Charged On All Balances Over 30 D,ays,Past Due. Marketing • Communications Advertising 7157 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • (612) 942 -8456 Fax: (612) 942 -8470 L l � LONSBURY - MILLS, LTD to TOTAL $1485. GRAND TOTAL $5380. 50% _ $2690..City Share of Revenues -1485. Cost of City Ads $1205. Credit. Due: $ 1205.00 (_ $1485. in ad costs) Marketing • Communications • Advertising' 7157 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • (612) 942 -8456 Fax: (612) 942 -8470 Advertising Revenues Summer 1991 About Town PAGE AD SIZE ADVERTISER COST 6 qtr page Burnet Realty. $400. 7 qtr page Marquette Bank $400. 11 qtr page Walgreens $400. 12 qtr page Adv. Back Care $364. 14 qtr, page Gill Brothers $389. 21 qtr page L'Allier Chiro. $400. 23 qtr page Pro Instant Print S389. 25 qtr page Sylvan Lea -raring $425. 28 qtr page Northern Irrigation $364. 29 qtr page Edina Realty $364. TOTAL $3895. CITY OF EDINA ADS PAGE AD SIZE ADVERTISER COST 9 qtr page Edina Hist. Soc. $389. 18 qtr page Edina Liq. Store $389. 19 qtr page Centennial Lakes $707. TOTAL $1485. GRAND TOTAL $5380. 50% _ $2690..City Share of Revenues -1485. Cost of City Ads $1205. Credit. Due: $ 1205.00 (_ $1485. in ad costs) Marketing • Communications • Advertising' 7157 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • (612) 942 -8456 Fax: (612) 942 -8470 A..li REQUEST FOR PURCHASE SE TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob ' Ko j e t in VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 2,8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM IV. H. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract tree and stump removal of boulevard trees.. Company Tree Removals: 1" to 30" over 30" Stump Grinding 1. Precision Landscape & Tree $9.00 /in. $13.00 /in. $1.91 /in. 2. TW & Company $9.09 /in. $13.29/in. $2.09 /in. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Precision Landscape & Tree for a maximum contract of $12,000 worth of work. GENERAL INFORMATION: Contracts for removal of trees and stumps are based on diameter inch of the tree. We are writing the contract for up to $12,000 based on past years experience. Through the rest of the summer we will be removing serval inches of trees and stumps. Information for quotes was sent out to 5 tree companies, only 2 companies responded. The Recommended bid is X �n � within budget not within d Ellin. ance Director K. neth Rosland Cit anaaer i�N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15.0-00 DATE: June 28, 1991 AGENDA ITEM Ty_ i ITEM DESCRIPTION: Four-wheel drive utility tractor with cab, wing and Company rear motor. Tractor Trade -in Total Cost 1. Scharber & Sons $39,959.00 $4.500.00 $35,459.00 2. Carlson Tractor & Equipment Co. $46,291.00 $10.211.00 $36,080.00 3. Long Lake Ford Tractor, Inc. $37,483.00 $2.500.00 $34,983.00 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend rejection of all bids on February 13, 1991 from Long Lake Ford an&recommend--.Scharber & Sons. GENERAL INFORMATION: Long Lake Ford and Tractor, Inc. has not been able to deliver materials within 120 days as stated in contract. Long LAke Ford has brought it to. our attention that the tractor is still in Germany and will probably be a minimum of 4 to 6 weeks before delivery. Therefore, it is our recommendation that Scharber & Sons who is the second: low bidder and has a veRicle available for immediate delivery be awarded. The Recommended bid is within budget not epart ent G �f �udApt tlri I ' , Finance Director Rosland C?tf Manager Cn �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • '�CbRpOMtiy _ lose To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # •A From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER . Consent U Information Only H Date: JUNE 27, 1991 Mgr. Recommends a To HRA Subject: CROWN VETCH AT 4404 WEST j I To Council 58TH STREET I —, Action 'u Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: The attached letters have been received concerning the subject property. I will give an oral update at Monday's meeting. "J' , `* f Donald and Tune Swanson June 27,1991 To: Edina City Council From: Mr & Mr"s Donald M. Swanson 4408 West 58th Street Subject: Diane Lindgren's, Crown Vetch Problem At the last city council meeting on June 17th, 1991, I presented to the council my thoughts relative to the crown vetch grown by Diane Lindgren. However, I did not present my second solution to the Vetch problem other than eradication. An easy way to solve Ms. Lindgren's mowing problem of her steep back yard, is for her to 'install a retaining wall at the rear of her lot where it abuts Philbrook Lane and change the,slope of her yard. It would then be easy to mow. A tree or two or some bushes along the top of the wall would be attractive. Our primary concerns about this vetch problem are the obvious detriment to property values, the invasive nature of this weed into our adjoining property,• and that this weed could be the start of a major problem for the city of Edina. Respectfully yours, 'T7 i June 24, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council, This letter is in response and as a follow up to the City Council meeting on June 17th regarding the crown vetch problem at 4404 West 58th Street. I was bot -h dismayed and delighted. Dismayed that the city did not enforce its existing ordinance and require the cutting of the crown vetch to already established ordinance height limits. Delighted that consideration will be given to erradicating the problem all together. It appears d e -f i -n i -t i on - w i -s a - -- t -h-a t -- i -t --- ca n- -b e-- -r e g a r d e d- a-s -a -- -- - -- -- "rank vegetation ". This is supported by the written recom- mendation to the city from the park boards environmentalist. It is undoubltedly a nuisance to all in the surrounding homes. Especially those flanking the lot who are fearing invasion of the growth. Therefore, the ordinance should cover the cutting or removal of it. I am so hoping that.it comes to one of these decisions_Monday July 1st as it is truly a blight on a once beautiful neigh- borhood. We would like it resolved before the summer-is over. I hope it is confirmed to all of us affected by this that our city ordinances are there to protect the good of the majority and that the city will classify this as a nuisance rank vegetation and enforce the height limitations or better yet its entire remov @.l. When it is dried and long in the fall it is most certainly a fire hazard. It was not mowed last fall or this spring. Thank you for not referring it to mediation. That would have not settled anything and certainly not quickly. I can speak only for myself, but I would be willing to help the property owner with whatever the council determines to be the right solution to correcting the lawn. This is not a personal dispute for me but rather an attempt to have ordinances enforced so our surroundings can be enjoyed by all. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Marge Buss 4400 Philbrook Lane Edina, MN 55424 June 27, 1991 v 1HZ CITY CuUNCIL C uLINA: I live at 4400 1N. 58th Street, next door to the "rank growth of vegetation ". I purchased this property in Nov. 1989 and when I asked about the �rowth in the yard next door I was told the owner did not want to maintain the yard because it was too much trouble to cut the hill. I was told Miss Lindgren '_ad darted a ground cover and the city would not allow it to get out of hand, which it has. It is a constant rroblem to keep this growth from entering my yard. ;efore movinc- here we live in the old country club area at 4621 'r!ooddale for 27 years. Because of retirement and increasing property taxes we were forced to sell and -find a less expensive home. I am sure that this "rank growth of veg.etaticn" would not be tolerated in the country club area by the City of 7dina. "And I feel it certainly should not be permitted in this area. I am �8 years old and mow ny own yard, so T feel -a young rerson should not have a problem mowing her lawn. I no longer feel I can maintain my property and can not ray someone else to take care of it then I will sell and move on. "iss Lindgren has spoken with one of the neighbors and suggested we all �-_elr pay for removing this growth and replace it with sod. -Hut since she °el' i •:ors too much trouble to cut refore I can not see 'now she will `�e able to naintain the sodded hill later. 1 do not feel one person should have the right to disrur.t an entire neighborhood because she cannot maintain her property. Since the city dept. has classified this as a "rank growth of vegetation" and there is a city ordinance on the books that calls for this growth to be eradicated, as it is a nuisance, no more of your time should be wasted discussing this issue. Michael Sitek June 26, 1991 Members of the Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55424- Re: Diane Lindgren home & yard 4404 W. 58th Street, Edina a Dear Sirs: This writer has resided at 4404 Philbrook, directly in back of Ms. Lindgren, for 37 years. I happened to be the builder of eight houses in this area including Ms. Lindgrens. The former owner that I built for was a banker and exceedingly fussy about keeping up his property. When the property came up for sale, the buyer had to pay more than the listing price as many others wanted the property also. Now comes Nis. Lindgren. She failed to talk with any of her neighbors to dicuss her plans to change her landfiappin'g mode. Rather, she bulled ahead with her plan much to the dismay of her neighbors. She was confronted several times but refused to pay any attention and seemingly let the vetch grow into what appeared to be a patch of weeds. All the cats love it as it looks to them to be a haven for mice. To us, the neighbors, it looks as if the property is deserted. The neighborhood, including ourselves, abhor the appearance and only wish the property can be restored to where it was when purchased a short time ago. Respectfully & Cordially, o e REROIRT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler Date: July .1, .1991 Subject: Solid Waste Collection - Review of March 4 Staff Report, Janet Chandler & Dave Velde - Recyclinq Commission Recommendati - Leaque of Women Voters Report Agenda Item # . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion 'n ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion The Recycling Commission considered these options for garbage collection: 1. organized collection, 2. open hauling, (present system,) 3. districting. The majority voted to keep the open hauling system. There also was support for the districted system, a variation of open hauling, whereby the City designates collection days, thereby assuring that all residents have recycling and garbage service on the same day.. Two commissioners recommend organized collection as being the better choice from an environmental standpoint. The staff recommendation is to keep the present system. IFF,O /BACLCGRODAD The enclosed staff report was briefly discussed by Council on March 4. At that time, the Edina League of Women Voters also reported that they were undertaking a study of garbage collection. Their study has been completed and the consensus report is included for Council consideration. Contents: -Staff report, pg 2 -6 - Letters from residents, pg 7 -8 - Response from haulers, pg 9 -15 - Newspaper clipping, pg 16 - League of Women Voters of Edina Report, pg 17 -18 0 2 DEFINITIONS Open Hauling: city licensed haulers can service any area of the city; property owners contract privately with the hauler of their choice. Districting: same as open hauling except the city requires that all solid waste be picked up on a certain day within each designated district. Organized Collection: the city contracts with a hauler or group of haulers to provide service for the entire city or section /s of the city. Organized Collection Legal Process: The Minnesota Waste Management Act requires the following 180 -day procedure prior to implementing organized collection. It is not required for districting. 1. Two week advance public notice, and mailed notice to all haulers of a public hearing to consider organized collection. 2. Following the public hearing, Council may adopt a resolution of intent to organize garbage collection. , 3. A 90 -day planning period shall be spent working with the licensed haulers of the city to develop a collection plan agreeable to the city and the haulers. 4. If the city is unable to agree on a plan with the haulers within this 90 days,.it may then propose an alternate plan. 5. The second 90 -day period shall be spent in evaluating the plan ( #3 or #4) according to these standards: - achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city, - minimizing displacement of collectors, - ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision making process, and - maximizing efficiency in solid waste collection. EDINA GARBAGE SERVICES Currently, there are four garbage haulers serving Edina residents: Admiral Waste Management, Quality Waste Control, Vierkant Disposal and Woodlake Sanitary'Service (BFI). These haulers all offer volume -based garbage fees for their customers. The increase in garbage rates in the past few years, reflects the tip fee increase from $25 a ton to $95 a ton. Rates remained quite stable for the past several months. Yard waste fees varied a great deal in 1990, often tied to the level of service. • Full service customers usually paid less for yard waste pickup than customers on a one -can or two -can garbage rate. A rate of $1 per bag was common for low volume customers. Major appliance disposal is now governed by state law which requires recycling of appliances and special handling of PCB's, mercury switches and CFCs. Garbage haulers will usually make the arrangements for a customer, or residents can deal directly with an appliance recycler for pickup or delivery. A charge of $20 to $25 is common for pickup service. 3 GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON - -OPEN HAULING SYSTEMS The chart below compares the range of Edina rates and services with four other Hennepin County cities with open hauling systems. NUMBER OF SINGLE ONE CAN RATE TWO CAN RATE THREE OR MORE CITY SYSTEM HAULERS RATE LOW-HIGH LOW-HIGH LOW -HIGH' EDINA Open 4 516.00418.25 $19.00 - $20.75 $23.75 - $25.25 BLOOMINGTON District 6 $21 $14.50 - $17.00 $17.75 - $19.50 $21.75 - $23.75 (one hauler) EDEN PRAIRIE Open 3 514.00- $17.00 $17.00419.50 $21.75 - $22.50 MINNETONKA Open 10 $15.00 - $18.00 $18.00 - $20.00 $21.00424.00 RICHFIELD Open 5 $21 $14.00417.00 $17.00419.50 $23.00 - $22.75 (one hauler) The following observations can be made: - Edina's rates are $1.25 to $2 higher per month than the other cities listed. Since the other cities have curbside pickup, this difference is presumed to be for garage service. Otherwise, rates are similar, city to city. - Districting does. not appear to affect garbage rates. -With one exception, all haulers in these cities offer volume based rates. - Volume based rates offer residents the opportunity to save money on garbage service. For example; the difference between the lowest one -can rate and the highest full service rate in Edina is $9.25 per month. . GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON -- ORGANIZED HAULING SYSTEMS 30 GALLON 60 GALLON 90 GALLON YARD WASTE APPLIANCES RECYCLING EXCELSIOR $15.16 $17.90 +51.10 per bag Extra chg Separate contract, $1.80 /hh HOPKINS $19.04 No extra chg Extra chg Separate contract, $2.30 /hh (City Crew) ROBBINSDALE $12 Recycler S14 Racy 516.50 +$1 per bag Extra chg Cost included in $14 Non -recy $18 Non -rec $20.50 contract. ST.LOUIS PK $16.74 Recy No extra chg No extra chg Additional $2.02 /hh /mo, $19.07 Non -Recy Same contract. Comments on this chart: -The rates are for curb or alley pickup. -At all levels of service, the organized garbage .rates are somewhat lower than open hauling rates in the cities surveyed. Many factors such as smaller lot size and efficiency of alley pickup may account for the lower rates. The cities which more closely resemble Edina have open hauling systems, making comparison difficult. 4 -Yard waste pickup is included with the higher, single -rate service, but an add -on with low- volume service. This is similar to the open hauling rate structure. - Garbage and recycling service can be included in the same contract, but not all cities have chosen to do so. - Recycling has been encouraged by lower recycling rates or low- volume rates. FUTURE TRENDS The latest design is a high -tech computerized garbage truck which lifts, records the weight, and empties a. standardized garbage can automatically. Garbage bills are then computed on the basis of weight. Farmington, Minnesota plans to install the system this year. (See attachment) Trash now goes in many directions: recycling systems for paper, glass, metals, plastics, appliances, batteries, motor oil etc. -- compost sites for yard waste -- incineration for most garbage. This trend toward separate handling of waste materials shows no sign of stopping. The trend in rate structure seems to.be going toward user -fees, with separate charges for garbage, yard waste,.recyclables, appliances etc. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Why should a city consider organized garbage collection ?. Or a districted system? What are the policy concerns? The following factors are. presented for consideration in answering these questions. 1. Cost Savings for Residents From the comparison charts, it appears that rates would be lower with organized collection. The haulers disagree, stating in their responses, that there would not be a savings for residents. (See attachments) In organized systems,, cities can set the rate structure, and thereby promote recycling and waste reduction with volume -based fees or other incentives. There are, however, some unknowns. Factors such as lot size and distance from disposal sites also enter into the rate setting process. Other costs need to be considered in organized collection. City staffing would need to be increased, perhaps by one full time equivalent position, to deal with the additional utility billing and service problems. Also, we should expect some delinquencies in payment of bills by residents, which would increase costs. 2. Efficiency and Environmental Concerns Organized collection, with one garbage truck serving a neighborhood, is the most efficient system. It follows that there would also be a reduction in wear on streets and in the amount of truck exhaust. Because of separate pickups for garbage, recycling and yard waste, Edina neighborhoods under the present system may possibly have 10 or more trucks providing trash collection services. With..an organized system, three trucks would get the job done in any given neighborhood. 5 3. Esthetics: Neiahborhood Appearance With districted or organized systems each neighborhood can be served on one day with pickup of garbage, recycling and yard waste. The benefit to the neighborhood is a quieter, neater environment for the remainder of the week. 4. Freedom of Choice With an open system, residents can shop around for the hauling service that best suits their needs. For some, yard waste disposal is very important; for others, a low- volume garbage rate is most important. In the past, Edina residents- expressed a strong preference to preserve their choice of garbage haulers. In an organized collection process, residents would have the opportunity to express their wishes on this issue at a public hearing. 5. Illegal Garbage Disposal Edina ordinance #711 requires that garbage be collected weekly by a licensed hauler. Contrary to this ordinance, an unknown number of residents dispose of their garbage by other means. Some examples are: -A resident may collect the trash of an elderly parent and dispose of it at his /her own residence. -Two neighbors may arrange joint garbage service, putting their garbage in a common container and sharing the cost. - Garbage may be taken to a dumpster at the residents' place of business. - Garbage may be dropped in public places, such as the Recycling Center, Public Works Building or City Parks. - Garbage may be allowed to accumulate on the premises. In some cases, the rising cost of garbage collection was the motivating factor. On the other hand, some of these practices occurred when garbage rates were very low. Public dumping of garbage doesn't seem to be as serious a problem for Edina as for many other cities. Gene Bartz, Public Works Superintendant, has not observed any significant increase in garbage dumping in the past few years. He feels it is a minor problem which they are able to handle. organized garbage collection would assure that all residents have garbage service. The expectation would be that practices like those listed above would greatly diminish. One remaining question- -what happens when a bill isn't paid? If garbage service were then discontinued, the problems would return. 7. Response from Edina Garbage Haulers Edina residential haulers were notified of this meeting and asked to complete a questionnaire. Their written responses are attached to this report. In follow -up phone calls, the haulers all expressed their serious concern with organized hauling systems even if they were sure to be included in the contract. They view this type of system as limiting their opportunities to expand, since the pickup area and number of customers is set for the length of the contract. 6 Likewise, a districting system is seen as interfering with their ability to plan routes for maximum efficiency. One hauler who provides twice a week pickup would not be able to offer this service under a districting system unless an exception were made. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION Many residents feel that their garbage rates are too high. They are putting more into the recycling container, less in the garbage can, and feel they should see a savings on the garbage bill. This may not be a realistic-expectation, due to the high tip fee for garbage disposal, but it is a very understandable reaction. Perhaps new technology, such as paying for garbage by weight, will bring more fairness into rate structures. Each of the garbage systems has its advantages. There is not a clear -cut easy answer. The questions comes down to: what amount of savings justifies a changeover to a new system? $10 a year? $25 a year? or? And, what would the public prefer? If Council wishes to test public opinion on the issues, a public hearing can be set as the beginning of the organized collection process. This process can be concluded at that point if the weight of opinion so dictates. A districted system could be instituted with or without a public hearing. Council could direct staff to work with the haulers to develop such a system for Council approval. Lastly, if Council believes that the current system serves the residents well, no action need be taken at this time. Letter from Resident G L t'r ou.n- L 1 3-ity_ _.111.1a 480i w. 50th :lt. Edina, MK =342,t Dear Council Mepotrsi 7. I avn vritina to address the problem of pica -up costs an £dada vath hopes that discussed at• your- - ee -ting. rebr:iary 25. o: - C-heroxee i rail the mounting refuse the sutliect will be Along with many rlther Edina residents. we are a tvo- people housenola. Av hustland'= job takes him out. -of -town almost every week; therefore. orar garbage is very minimal, usually about *_yo fille4a grtjc.eY--? sags per week. We are on a limited one -can service arid. _once again, last week we received notice of ;•et another price increase. The nauler cited the increased charges due to '-rising costs in fuel. oil, equapmeni. parts and postage." This now brings our cost of disposal to somewhat over X2.00 for each filled grocery bag. In aaditaor, last. Ealv?er 1 has to shell out another 'x25.00 to have a gas grill hauled away. As a 0 -year resident of Edina. I wholeheartedly support the recyc.iang effort and pa:;z.acipate to the fullest. including composting grass clippings and leaves. And hour about the 2 to bags of Paper, • =anc. _Mastic and glass that I recycle every week �+hich the hauler no longer picks yip? It seems to me that - -ometriing is v-rong here. The trash hauler gets a whole lot more for doing a whole lot less! What is the solution? Perhaps the City of Edina should look at the system used in St. Louis Park wherein one trash hauler services a section of the city. The fee (which includes Pickup of appliances, mattresses. etc.) goes on the water bill. This is certainly more efficient than the present method and the haulers would cut down on their "rising_ costs in fuel. oil, etc.* Thank You. Sincere! Y, -- : Lou Grass . . 941. 7622 ��- � :r3 . _ ,_ �- �"� a - �� .:- i- e�''+�e• ��. Letter from Resident 8. October ! , 1990 Ron Dror 6227 Westridee Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Fred Richards, Mayor. Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th S reet Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Richards, When my family moved to Edina three years ago, I was struck by The inefficiency of the garbage collection system. -laving lived previously in Salt Lake City, Utah, ana ,Madis-on, Wisconsin, I was accustomed to having garbage collected by the city or by a company which had contracted with the city. I realize that the current system in Edina encourages residents to decrease the amount of garbage they produce by forcing them to pay for collection out of their own pockets instead of through taxes. At the same time, however, the system wastes huge amounts of energy, labor, and money. In Salt Lake City and Madison, one garbage truck would pass by my home each week. It would collect garbage from every house in the area. In Edina, on the other hand, each household 'is free to contract with a different garbage service. Thus, many garbage trucks, one from each company, _pass near my house every week. Although each stops at different homes, they all must cover the entire route. ,'his represents a large waste of gasoline, time, and labor to the garbage services. The cost 'is passed on to The residents of Edina. If the city as a whole were to contract with any one service, this needless waste would not occur. 1'!ie price of garbage collection would be- reduced, and so would the impact of gasoline waste on the environment. in order to discourage garbage production by residents, the city of Edina could collect fees in proportion to the amount oZ garbage it collected. rn such a system, garbage Collection would be cheaper and the impact on the , rnvironment far less. Sincerely, Ron Dror V FEB 25 '91 03 :25PM J0 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. ASubsidlaryof aste Mlysterris- EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNAIRE If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you believe that there -would be a reduction in cost of the service to the resident? RESPONSE: Organized collection as discussed in this region includes two different forms of hauling systems. One being a bid scenario, where the City sends out a bid document and selects only one hauler for their community. The second is organized collection by consortium. This consortium includes all of the current haulers in the community who join together and negotiate a contract with the City working as a single entity. The consortium then assigns routes according to the household count each hauler held prior to the implementation of organized collection. On the surface organized collection may appear in some cases to be less expensive than the open hauling system. However, in our region there are clear examples that organized collection is more expensive (i.e. Champlin, etc.). Not only is the cost at least the same if not higher, no community includes their administrative costs as part of the overall expense of either system.' In comparing- costs, other issues that impact price need review as well. Issues such as distance to disposal sites, service levels, and average lot size of the community served. When all these issues are taken into consideration organized collection is not less expensive than open collection. However, on the surface these issues are not easily analyzed. If so, how much would the cost reduction be per month for a home with full service? RESPONSE: (NONE) What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household refuse collection? RESPONSE: (NONE) What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse collection? 9813 Flying Cloud Drive ! Eden Prairie. Mlnnosetn 551e? r ec,es eq.,o.+. - .. FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM 10. Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Cont'i'nued Concerns of the General Public Organized collection takes away the consumers freedom to choose who picks up his /her trash and at what level of service that pick up can be offered. Edina, as an affluent suburb, has a relatively high percentage of "back door" service. A reduction in this rate of service will be an unpopular proposal to many residents. Other concerns of the general public would be the mandatory service required under an organized system. The choice of those independent home owners who choose to take their trash to the landfill /transfer station themselves is taken away. Since, under organized collection, each refuse company would be granted a separate district in which only that company can provide service, what alternative would the resident have if the refuse removal service proved unacceptable? The refuse hauler no longer has an incentive to provide good service to his customers, he now operates in a closed market.' Concerns of Private Haulers As mentioned earlier, organized collection destroys the incentive of the private refuse hauler to provide his customers with good service. The incentive to provide good service is competition. Organized collection is an anti- competitive system which denies private industry any opportunity to expand its service area or capitalize'on its ability to meet the different needs of the public. Many residential refuse haulers rely on their "personal touch" service to retain and expand their customer base. Organized collection negates any advantages a private refuse hauler might have in offering a different type of service. Private haulers face many service - Every refuse hauler has different Organized collection does not take refuse collection business: 1.) Volume inequities under an organized system. costs and procedures of operation. into account some key elements of the 2.) Unequal distance to landfill /transfer station 3.) Differences in growth potential If all the rates are the same, how does a hauler get compensated for a greater distance to the landfill /transfer station? If one side of the city is fully developed and the other side a new and growing development, who gets this new expansion? These concerns are answered by private industry, not organized collection. Concerns of Municipalities The "active supervision" required by law of an organized collection system would be a major undertaking for the City of Edina. With the expense of staff to administer the program, monitor service complaints, realign boundaries., the sxpease..:of. -. "no payments" or- "late - payments ", etc:.. the.. City- FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM 11. Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Continued will unknowingly enter the refuse collection business in a very big way. Safety and third party liabilities are also a concern to municipalities. Since the City would be under contract to the Organized Collection Corporation, the City would have the ultimate responsibility for the trash under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Superfund). The City must also be concerned with the insurance coverage levels of all of the refuse haulers. By contracting with the Organized Collection Corporation, the City can now be named as a third party in any resulting lawsuit. This third party liability Would also include any Workers' Compensation action. Organized collection exposes the City of Edina to area of liability and expense that are now handled and absorbed by private industry. The. actions - necessary for installing an organized system, districting (lack of choice), mandatory service, limited service and potential bad service open City Officials to large areas of potential public outcry. Recycling, which is the main goal of Edina, is not dependent on organized collection. A private industry effort, like the one currently in place, can and will solve the needs of Edina as mandated by the Metropolitan Council. Other Comments: RESPONSE: See attached materials. Illegal dumping is often an issue discussed in conjunction with organized collection. Communities believe that organized collection eliminates illegal dumping and "garbage houses" because garbage is collected at every household. This appears to be logic however, all communities report increases with illegal dumping whether in the open system or the organized collection system. The so called garbage houses are a matter 'of mental health and not a collection process. Illegal dumping is still taking place (i.e. Minneapolis) to help a household decrease their volume rate. Further, illegal dumping takes place because of irresponsible, anti - social behavior and illegal dumping is not a sole problem of the.open hauling system. Return to: David A. Velde Company Name: Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Telephone #: (612)- 941 -5174 Edina, MN 55424 Your Name: Kevin Tritz I :1 I'i L H FEB 25 ' 91 03 : 27PM 13. Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued : .r M ro/S-tt.a te i ews. . Stbr Tribune �I.p,r Tuesday October 23/1990 Read then recycle B w as- No ivlor.e.� folks, trashing. i a e g al dum p inq o n rise 1. pshaulin :By Stcre Brandt Stafi•Writer 'When Independence Mayor Marvin 46hnsti,i isn't fighting a proposal to :put a landfill in his western Henne- pin County community, he farms. .1-1c 's fighting garbage along his fence 'lines as well. Sometimes it's tires. 10111V times it's brush. %Ia "1231 year we had practically a whole living room set situng in a turner of our cornfield, Johnson said. gJees increase -'Across the Twin Cities metiopelitan U9. mono people like Johnson are being •victimized • by illegal trash dumping Rising disposal fees are prompting more people to try to .stake their garbage someone else's iproblem. They risk fines of up to 1750 by stashing trash in ditches, usiness trash bins or even ,outer i*ople's cans. ,The victims are fighting bsck- Some .businesses are padlocking their bins and others search bags of unwanted trash for envelopes or other evidence of where the refuse originated. Minneapolis oMcfals began offering S50 rewards last year to .citizens whose reports on illegal dumping ra_ suit in succcullid prosecutions. The rise in illegal trash dumping has resulted in a staff proposal to the Metropolitan Council that all house. holds, business or institutions that produce trash be required to main- tain a contract with a hauler. There always has been some illegal dumping slung railroads, in vacant lots and to ditches. But rising costs mean a marked increase in the prob- lem in Carver County, according to Mike Lien. the county's envirunmcn- tal manager. ' Ditches in less populous areas on the fringe of the region regularly are lit- tered .with Items that are banned. front trash Baru or are hauled away for an extra charge. These include tires, appliances, furniture, yard waste and even demolition waste. Waste specialists describe two types of culprits. One is a homeowner who is simply too cheap to pay rising hauler charges. The other- is an unit - censed hauler. According to Metro - politan Council estimates. the cost of residential garbage service has risen between. 40 and 100 percent in urban areas in the past two years, prompt- ing some customers to caned trash pickup. The increase was estimated at 25 percent for rural residents of the region. When hauler or businesses do find Trash continued on page 79 FEB 25 '91 03:27PM t_FlkLtiUN 14. Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued Glenn Kiecker, who supervises pollution control for Minneapolis, Investigated an Illegal dump site In the city. Monday, He found papers with addresses at the site that may ossast.ln tracking down the sources of the trash, Trash Continued front page. ID ; people not clever enoush to remove iderttirication from their trash. they Ilcnnepin County charges haulers S95 a ton to dispose or wash, a fee in Carver County. submit a bill and threaten td turn the that finances multiple waste disposal t:lcnn Kiecker, who supervises pollu- mntter over to polio. "It works 100 percent or the tune," said Sandy programs. In Ramsey County, where Ilia fee increased recently from about tion control for Minneapolis, said unlicensed haulers cruise alleys to Roskuwisk, one of the owners of Randy's Sanitation. $50 to almost $67 per ton, Hertnann solicit garbage front people who have finds less illegal dumping. just cleaned their garagea or, baser One commcrcial hauler says y prob- Hennepin -s trash lees have spillover ments. They ellarge a -high fee and dump the trash without paying for i lems with illegal dumping are the. effects on sonic neighboring counties. disposal. worst in the western metropolitan "That's going to be the headache of area. "Crrutinly Hennepin County by far has the worst problem." said Tint the next few years. It's pretty easy to drive down the road and dump a 'They ean'makc an awral lot ornion- i cy on this," Kiecker said. Hcrrttann, a vice president of Angnrd refrigerator ofr ilia back of a truck or 1 Environmental Services. a couple bags of garbage," said Lien 15. Response from Vierkant Disposal EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNARIE If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you believe that there would be a reduction in cost of the service to the resident? If so, how much would the cost reduction be per month for a home with full service? What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household refuse collection? What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse collection? Other Comments: v Return to: David A. Velde Company Name:IL� City of Edina ` 4801 West 50th St. Telephone TO Edina, MN 55424 .Your Name: HARM NoRSorVSTAFF PHOTOGRAPHER A high -tech garbage truck, using Its robot -like mechanical arm, weighs a can of garbage before empty - Ing It to haul the trash away. FARNWNTON High -tech garbage hauling device _figures what you owe RICHARD CNN STAFF WNTER Garbage hauling is going high -tech in Farmington. The city is planning an innovative program to use automated and computerized garbage trucks that can measure and record the weight of every garbage can. That way, Farmington residents will be charged ac- cording to the weight of what they throw away. City officials hope it will be a more precise and fair way of billing. Righ rollers who throw out more trash and take up more space in garbage trucks and land- fills will have to pay more. Frugal folks who aren't so wasteful will pay less. The new equipment also means haulers will no long- er need to wrestle garbage cans around, instead they'll have to punch a keyboard and use a bar code scanner. The city plans to install and test the equipment this year and start weight -based billing in 1992. Garbage officials believe it may be the first weight -based city- wide system in the nation. The total cost to implement the project will be $154,166, but the city is applying for a $68,163 grant from the Metropolitan Council to help pay for the equipment. The program is expected to encourage residents to trim the weight of their trash cans through increased recycling. The city hopes for a 5 percent to 10 percent reduction in garbage collections. If that happens, not only will recycling residents see a decrease in their bills, but the cost for the entire city garbage system also should drop because the city will have to pay less for disposal at a landfill or garbage processing center. Robert Williamson, Farmington solid waste coordi- nator, said the proposal has attracted interest from public officials from around the country. Other haulers have offered volume -based billing, but the difference is that those systems mean keeping track of different -sized garbage cans, he said. The city of nearly 6,000 people is used to being on the cutting edge of garbage management, partly be- cause it has more control of how it deals with its waste than most other cities in the metro area. It is the only Dakota County city that owns and op- erates its own garbage hauling program to pick up waste for all residents and businesses. Most other cit- ies have left garbage hauling to the private sector. In those towns, residents and companies hire whatever private hauler they choose. With control over its own garbage program. Farm- ington offers its residents an opportunity to recycle more different kinds of materials than any other city in the county. Residents have curbside pickup of office paper, corrugated cardboard, batteries and plastics, in addition to the traditional recyclables: newspapers, cans and glass. Williamson said the city recycles about 29 percent to 30 percent of its residential and commercial gar - bage, including yard waste. Farmington also is proposing to build a garbage compost and recycling project which would make it the only city in Dakota County that would not have to send waste to the county's proposed garbage incinera- tor project. County recycling specialist Mike Trdan said Farm - ington's recycling rate is one of the best in the county and the best documented. "They know what they're doing right to the pound;' he said. "I think for a small town, they have accom- plished an awful lot." To set up the weight -based garbage collection sys- tem, the city plans to operate two special garbage trucks with hydraulic arms that hoist garbage cans . over the side of the truck instead of the back end. Traditional back - loading trucks require at least two workers to operate, but the side - loading trucks only need one worker. In the new trucks, the operator drives up to a can at the curb and stays in the cab while he controls the hydraulic arm that reaches out from the side of the truck and snatches up the can with what looks like a mighty mechanical lobster claw. Before the garbage is dumped in the truck, a sensor in the hydraulic arm measures how much the can weighs, and that information is entered into a portable computer in the cab. The operator also uses a bar code sensor to record the address of the customer. Other information also can be coded into the computer, sack as the license plate number of a vehicle blacking ac- cess to the garbage can. Back at city offices, the computer will add up the weight of each customer's garbage and calculate the bill every quarter. Williamson said residents will be charged a flat service fee, plus a fee for every 10 pounds of garbage thrown away. Currently, the city charges each resident $42.50 per quarter for picking up a 90 -gallon container of gar- bage per week, whether the can is half -full or over- flowing. To get the new system rolling, Farmington needs to buy another garbage truck. computer equipment and software, weight sensors, garbage cans and address decals for the cans. 16. S1 P «•.1 FIoXeer & a>v"7 ,t, !44 I r l$l F)w lei 17. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF EDINA 7500 Hyde Park Drive, Edina, MN 55439 (612) 944 -7734 Ms. Janet Chandler Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Janet: June 26, 1991 Pursuant to our conversation yesterday, I have listed our existing positions as well as the recently adopted position on recycling on the attached sheet. If you have any questions, please contact me or Nancy Grimsby. As you know, Nan is "our resident expert" on this topic and chair of our recycling studies. Thanks again, Janet, and I look forward to working with you in the future. Vgry truly yours, Robin W. Larkin President RWL:ms Attachment 1W LEAGUE OF, WOMEN VOTERS OF EDINA Existing Positions on Recycling Support for the household pickup of recyclables in Edina. Support of adequate City staff for local recycling programs. Support for an ordinance to allow curbside placement of recyclables for pickup. Support of a City-wide anti- scavenging ordinance to protect these recyclables from being picked up by anyone other than the designated receiver. Support for adequate funding for a household pickup system. Newly adopted position on recycling Support for government action to assist recycling of all materials, including: 1) education; 2) tax incentives; and 3) funding and grants for research. Support for regulations to require government use of recycled materials whenever possible. Support for the concept of the environmental "four R's" (Reduce, Re -use, Recycle, React) using 1) education; 2) consumer action; and 3) lobby government to increase items collected for recycling as markets become available. Support for an open hauling* garbage collection system in Edina. ( *Open Hauling: hauler may service any area of the City on any day he chooses. Resident may choose the hauler. This is the system in place currently in Edina. The City does have some control by requiring that the hauler be licensed by the City.) Attachment for letter to Janet Chandler from Robin Larkin, June 26, 1991. r ot_3A. Lrl. e 1 , �' REP � ORT/ - RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards and Council From: Bob Ko j etin, Director. . Park and Recreation Dept. Date: June 28, 1991 Subject: Golf Course Improvements Continuation from June 17. Recommendation: Agenda Item # v • c Consent [� Information Only [] Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action E] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Bill Lord MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE TWO FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS: CLUBHOUSE FEASIBILITY EXPANSION ($15,000) FOR ARCHITECT REPORT AND OLD MAINTENANCE BUILDING REPLACEMENT FOR $86,200. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Info /Background: The enclosed revised financial report from the Braemar Golf ° Course 3 Year Workbook Plan for improvements to the golf course. The financial report helps to indicate where the monies for the recommendation to approve the replacement of the old maintenance building at an expense of $86,200 and the feasibility study for club house at $15,000'for a total of $101,200 might be obtained. The money will come from the net income of the 1990 Budget. The fiance report shows that we include in the operating budget replacement of equipment and Golf Course improvements. I have tried to include the anticipated budget for the next 3 years, indicating a 3% increase in operation expenditures and revenues. In the May 14, 1991 Park Board minutes, a discussion was held in having a fund called "Reserves" for future Capital Improvements. The Park Board recommendation was that if there was a recommendation for improvement to the golf course, that the merit and the funding of the improvement would be considered at that particular time and no Reserve Fund would be established. e •1 f- FINANCIAL REPORT Golf Course 1990 1991 1992 .1993 OPERATING AND EXPENSE REPORT Operating Revenue 1,632,586 1,768,300 1,818,000 1,868,000 * Operating Expense 1,009,468 1,250,500 1,300,000 1,330,000 623,118 517,800 518,000 538,000 Nonoperating Expenses (Bonds) 157,916 277,205 277,000 277,000 465,202 240,595 241,000 261,000 Depreciation 318,473 205,000 205,000 205,000 Net Income 146,729 35,595 36,000 66,000 (A) REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENTS IN OPERATING BUDGET EACH YEAR Equipment Replacement Schedule 78,000 85,000 90,000 (line item in golf maintenance operation) Course and Range Improvements 73,000 75,000 69,500 (line item in golf range operation) Golf Dome Improvements 20,000 10,000 10,000 (line item in golf dome operation) Clubhouse Building and Furnishing Replacements 25,000 25,000 25,000 (line item in golf clubhouse operation) 196,000 195,000 194,500 MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS NOT IN OPERATING BUDGET FUNDED FROM NET INCOME EACH YEAR Clubhouse Feasibility Expansion 15,000 for Architect Report Old Maintenance Building Replacement 86,200 ($86,200) Budgeted From Net Income 101,200 (A) All Operating Budget is in the Operating Expense Report 14A. o (Le 0 r REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To' Mayor Richards and Council From: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept. Date: June 13, 1991 Subject: Golf Course Improvements Recommendation: Agenda Item* vz • C • 2 Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Bill Lord MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE TWO FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS: CLUBHOUSE FEASIBILITY EXPANSION FOR ARCHITECT REPORT AND OLD MAINTENANCE BUILDING REPLACEMENT FOR $86,200. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Info /Background From the Park Board May 14th Minutes: Mr. Kojetin stated that at the end of the last Park Board meeting he had talked about a work book schedule he was preparing for the golf course. He indicated that in the past there was a ten year plan, then it was a five year plan and now it is a three year plan. He stated that things change so fast and the golf course needs to keep up -to -date on everything. Mr. Kojetin noted that a couple of years ago a presentation was made to the Park Board on the-construction of a tee oasis on each one of the holes of the 18 hole course and the executive course. These tee oasis' would designate each one of the holes, they would have a brick surface, a certain species of flowering trees, benches, trash receptacles and ball washers. Over a period-of approximately three years this project is to be completed. At present six have been completed. At the same presentation it was indicated that the golf course should continue to upgrade the tee fairways, ruffs and general overall improvement of pathways and trees. The golf course is now in its second year of -this project. 21 Mr. Kojetin noted that the work book goes to 1993 which will hopefully complete the total project.. The work book also indicates improvements for the next five years. A work book was sent to each Park Board member to give them an opportunity to see the upgrading and reconstruction of each hole and which year the improvement will be done. Also, the work book indicates the amount of equipment purchased, the total cost of maintenance improvements and also the annual repairs and upkeep of the clubhouse, dome and driving range. All of these areas are covered under line item improvements in the yearly operating budget for the golf course. These average ,a total of $196,000 per year, which will be invested back into the golf course on an annual basis. Mr. Kojetin stated that he used a 3 percent increase on revenue for expenses for the next two years in figuring the operating budget. Major capital expenses that will be needed could come from the net profit each year from the golf course. Items such as the clubhouse and upgraded improvements of the old maintenance building could come from the net profit of the 1990 budget. The balance of the net that is not used could be set aside in a reserve for a capital improvement to the clubhouse in 1992 or 1993 of what is left over in the net profits of the operating budget. This way revenue bonds would not have to be sold for upgrading the clubhouse. Bob Christianson asked if this was a change of philosophy. He does not recall establishing a reserve and also noted that this is a new concept. Mr. Kojetin noted that money has always been reinvested back into the facility. If money is put into a reserve then work can start on a clubhouse and bonds will not be needed. Mr. Christianson asked if this would be a dedicated fund. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would not. It was noted that this is contrary to what was said at a previous discussion. Mr. O'Connor asked where the fund would come from? Mr. Montgomery asked if it is strictly from the 18 hole course. Mr. Kojetin stated that it would come from the total operation of the golf course, golf dome and executive course. The Park Board's concern is the term reserve. Mr. Christianson indicated that the position of the Braemar Group was assurance that profits stay with the golf course. It was his understanding that the money was not specially allocated to any one thing, the council could allocate improvements as it deemed necessary. Mr. Valliere indicated that he felt the golf course is generating enough net income so as in the next couple of years money could be allocated for improvements to the clubhouse without selling revenue bonds. At this time it's not known what the improvement would cost for the expansion of the clubhouse administrative area. It is important to have the clubhouse completed before the construction of the new nine hole course. Mr: Lord indicated that he felt you expose yourself when you show money in a reserve. Mr. O'Connor stated that anyone knows you cannot predict net income. It was noted again that the term reserve is the problem. Mr..Valliere indicated that the golf course is doing well financially as well as in maintenance and upkeep. By including these items in the operating budget each year it's easier to have the ability to manage the facility with these items in the maintenance budget and then certain areas of major projects over $150,000 each year could be considered. AGENDA ITEM V.D COM[MT4 SERVICES BOARD Meets 2nd Thursday. 7:30 A.M.. Edina Community Center - Room 104, 1 year term. (7/1 to 6/30) L Mays, Sally, 5529 Countryside Rd. (36) 920 -6013 6/30/91 C Smith, Glenn L., 5717 Susan Av. (39) 893 -6920 941 -6767 6/30/91 P Sour, Clifford, 6805 Paiute Dr. (39) 941 -6235 6/30/91 P - Park Board Appointment L - At Large Appointment C - Council Appointment 1 — To: Frederick S. Richards, Mayor 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 I am willing to accept reappointment. I will be unable to accept reappointment. Name of Bo�md /Commission Community Services Board Phone Si g _ Address �� / �C' 1NA. Il�r'L� �1 o e� O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Council Members Agenda Item # v. E. From: Mayor Richards Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: June. 27, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: To Council NORMANDALE ADVISORY BOARD Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation:. Review the attachment for discussion at the Council Meeting. Info/Background- The attachment is a correspondence I received regarding an appointment to the Normandale Advisory Board. If you have any thoughts prior to the Council Meeting regarding any recommendations for appointments you might have, please bring them with you. ,UN 25 '91 12:32 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. F -T from the desk of Mavis Schwartz P. 2/2. k�- 18138 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: JUNE 27, 1991 Subject: PETITION FOR CURB & i BIRCHCREST DRIVE Agenda Item # VT _A Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition for Curb & Gutter Only for Birchcrest Drive to the Engineering Department for processing. Info /Background The attached petition for curb and gutter only dated June 3, 1991, was received from property owners on Birchcrest Drive. Our normal procedure is,to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. -Iz" �4 , f c 91N��1 ow e tA City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: �r )o CITY COUNCIL o a 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • (612) 927 -8861 :. r f REI'1C7N:Y.Gt: ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWFAt ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET • SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 17 and U � //CaSbetween 91;r—le Jr ATION OF IMPROVEMENT Y STREET NAME RESS J RFSS d 1 Yii between 65 y LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN,AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME / (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE 'FaC7- ow A -,(c, 1- l' P=`- t7 This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1980 my V 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182700 06/21/91 48.05 WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.05 * 182701 06/21/91 91.02 LYONS SAFETY INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 182701 06/21/91 6.65 LYONS SAFETY INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 182701 06/21/91 270.41 LYONS SAFETY INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 368.08 * 182702 06/21/91 98.08 BAHLS MOTOR /IMPLEMNT REPAIR PARTS 98.08 * 182703 06/21/91 67.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE STRIPES 67.00 * 182704 06/21/91 17.00 HAROLDS CARTAGE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.00 * 182705 06/21/91 100.31 STERLING ELECTRIC LENS 100.31 * 182706 06/21/91 116.00 JERRYS SUPER VALU STAMPS 116.00 * 182707 06/21/91 190.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL DUES 190.00 * 182708 06/21/91 358.93 MARLIN IND DIVISION TRAINING MATERIAL 358.93 * 182709 06/21/91 137.50 ELECTRIC SERV CO MOVE POLE 137.50 * 182710 06/21/91 48.70 EMPIRE CLOCK INC MOTOR 48.70 * 182711 06/21/91 23.50 POLLY PFEIFER GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.50 * 182 -,2 06/21/91 150.00 MIKE RAWLINGS SERVICES 150.00 * 182713 06/21/91 445.00 SIGNAL SYSTEM INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 445.00 * 182714 06/21/91 467.76 THE PINK COMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 467.76 * 182715 06/21/91 500.00 EDINA CHORALE PERFORMANCE 6/30/91 500.00 * 182716 06/21/91 156.70 GENOVATION INC CM KEYBOARD 156.70 * 182717 06/21/91 •445.50 TRIO SUPPLY CO SOFT ICE 182717 06/21/91 162.45 TRIO SUPPLY CO SOFT ICE 07 -01 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 390 -30 181361 4191 10- 4642 - 301 -30 296304 4850 10- 4642- 301 -30 293194 4850 10- 4642- 301 -30 291892 4850 10- 4540 - 560 -56 166409 4904 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4537 5038 10- 4504 - 560 -56 16723 5035 10- 4540- 646 -64 3956 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10 -4204- 140 -14 10- 4202 - 281 -28 10- 4248 - 322 -30 021290 5275 40- 4540 - 801 -80 78760 5099 26- 4504 - 682 -68 30- 4201 - 784 -78 30 -4504- 784 -78 48334 5136 30- 4504 - 782 -78 5142 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- .4902 - 500 -50 4097 5226 26- 4624- 683 -68 152560 26- 4624 - 683 -68 152970 1 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 607.95 182718 182719 182720 182721 182722 182723 182724 182725 182726 182727 182728 182729 182730 182731 182732 182733 182734 182735 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21j91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 06/21/91 30.00 30.00 * 60.90 60.90 * 79.00 79.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * 175.00 175.00 * BARBARA FULLMER JUDY MARTIN KELLYS BLUE BOOK ALLEN ROTHE RICHARD HELMER RICHARD VERNON WM BOWLER LEROY LISK RICHARD MYRE WM LUTTS GREGORY SMEGAL STEPHEN LANDRY RONALD SAMUELSON JOHN MALONY JAMES SINGLETON JAMES JULKOWSKI ROBERT LAWSON ANDREW MEDZIS REFUND /SWIMMIMG REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 3500 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 5039 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182736 06/21/91 175.00 DAVID RADATZ CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 * 182737 06/21/91 175.00 PATRICK RUNNING CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 * 182738 06/21/91 175.00 BRUCE GATES CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 *- 182739 06/21/91 160.40 DOUGLAS BAGLEY CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 160.40 182740 06/21/91 175.00 JAMES SMITH CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 182741 06/21/91 175.00 JOSEPH STRUZYK CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 182742 06/21/91 175.00 DARRELL TODD CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 182743 06/21/91 175.00 MARTIN SCHEERER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 175.00 182744 .06/21/91 25.06 WALTER FASULO CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 25.06 * 182745 06/21/91 215.53 PAULINE WISE AMBULANCE REFUND 215.53 * 182746 06/21/91 360.00 SHARE AMBULANCE REFUND 360.00 * 182747 06/21/91 79.25 LYNN CARD CO NOTE CARDS 79.25 * 182748 06/21/91 5.95 COMPRESED AIT /EQUP FREIGHT 5.95 * 182749 06/21/91 104.41 MPLS AREA ASSO OF MLS SOD REPORT 104.41 * 182750 06/21/91 2,243.15 ELECT SYST /ANOKA REPAIR PARTS 2,243.15 * 182751 06/21/91 150.00 DICK HAYS SERVICES 150.00 * 182752 06/24/91 60.00 CHERI ANDERSON PERFORMANCE 7/11/91 182752 06/24/91 6.00- CHERI ANDERSON. PERFORMANCE 7/11/91 182752 .06/24/91 6.00 CHERI ANDERSON PERFORMANCE 7/11/91 60.00 182753 06/24/91 65.00 BECKY BROM PERFORMANCE 8/17/91 07 -01 -91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4266 - .440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10 -4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 7000 -00 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 440 -44 29195 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4540- 460 -46 1572 4215 30- 4201- 784 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182754 182755 182756 182757 182758 182759 182760 182761 182762 182763 182763 182763 182764 182765 182766 182767 182768 182769 182770 182771 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 06/24/91 AMOUNT 65.00 65.00 65.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 90.00 90.00 * 55.00 55.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00- 30.00 30.00 30.00 * 60.00 60.00 * 60.00 60.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 60.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BECKY BROM VFW POST KATHY FAUST PAT MENEELY MARGARET GUST BOB CONNOLLY ADRIANE BRUMFIELD AGNES FINE MARILYN HALL BILL DIETRICHSON BILL DIETRICHSON BILL DIETRICHSON JUDY LIEBER MARILYN HALL MARGARET GUST ROBIN MARIE PAT MENEELY. NICHOLAS LEGEROS BOB CONNOLLY ADRIANE BRUMFIELD PERFORMANCE 7/20/91 PERFORMANCE ART DEMO 8/3/91 ART DEMO 8/10/91 ART DEMO 8/10/91 ART DEMO ART DEMO ART DEMO 8/17/91 ART DEMO 8/3/91 ART FEMO 7/13/91 ART DEMO 7/13/91 ART FEMO 7/13/91 ART DEMO ART DEMO ART DEMO 7/18/91 ART DEMO 7/20/91 ART DEMO 7/20/91 ART DEMO 7/27/91 ART DEMO 7/6/91 ART DEMO 07 -01 -91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224- 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60.00 * 182772 06/24/91 60.00 BILL DIETRICHSON ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 60.00 * 182773 06/21/91 67.40 CROWN PLASTIC INC PAINT 30- 4544- 784 -78 107557 67.40 * 182774 06/21/91 83.23 METRO AFF SERV AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 4564 83.23 * 182775 06/21/91 250.00 PROSPECT DRILL /SAW SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 014824 5426 250.00 * 182776 06/21/91 74.00 LENORE A KENSON AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 74.00 * 182777 06/21/91 25.00 BRUCE KRUPNICK REFUND /TENNIS 10- 3500 - 000 -00 25.00 * 182778 06/21/91 24.00 THE ADSTORE INC PRINTING 30- 4600-781 -78 1659 182778 06/21/91 508.46 THE ADSTORE INC PRINTIN 30- 4600- 781 -78 532.46 * 182779 06/21/91 22.00 THOMAS WESELEY REFUND 10 -3500- 000 -00 22.00 * 182780 06/21/91 10.00 JAN DEJONG REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10.00 * 182781 06/21/91 10.00 CAROL GOODE REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 10.00 * 182782 06/21/91 90.00 KATHLEEN PEDERSON REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 90.00 * 182783 06/21/91 25.00 MARIA JOHNSON REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 25.00 * 182784 06/21/91 608.70 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 623 -62 608.70 * 182785 06/25/91 20.00 VFIS VIDEO TAPE 10- 4608 - 440 -44 20.00 * 182786 06/21/91 75.00 SENTIMENTAL SERVICE 9/24/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 * 182787 06/21/91 75.00 TRICA HAYNES SERVICES 9/26/91 30- 4224- 781 -78 75.00 * 182788 06/21/91 10.00 TC MUSIC /ARTS SERV 9/26/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10.00 * 182789 06/21/91 1,800.90 OSBORNE INNOVATIVE BATTING CAGE 25- 1139 - 000 -00 11859 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 1,800.90 182790 06/25/91 250.00 182790 06/25/91 250.00 182790 06/25/91 284.70 182790 06/21/91 44.00 5479 828.70 182791 06/21/91 20.00 CAREER TRACK 20.00 182792 06/21/91 99.00 CONT CLAY CO CRAFT SUPPLIES 99.00 1827,93 06/21/91 12.87 182793 06/21/91 117.20 182793 06/21/91 154.53 23- 4624 - 613 - 61,3072 284.60 182794 06/21/91 113.85 17433 5081 113.85 182795 06/25/91 132.00 LARSCO INC 132.00 182796 06/25/91 418.00 GE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 418.00 * 182797 06/25/91 68.64 PRO SERVICES 30- 4201- 784 -78 68.64 * 182798 06/25/91 800.00 10- 4540 - 560 -56 331660 800.00 * 182799 06/25/91 2,594.,00 2,594.00 * 182800 06/25/91 73.71 5557 MN DEPT OF JOBS 73.71 * 182801 06/25/91 48.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1ST HALF BALANCE 48.00 * 182802 06/25/91 26.55 REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 26.55 * 182803 06/25/91 10.80 30- 4516- 784 -78 12218 10.80 * 182804 06/25/91 30.00 182804 06/25/91 64.99 94.99 * 182805 06/25/91 90.00 90.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 07 -01 -91 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE NAME BRAND SPORTS SAFETY VESTS 10- 4642- 301 -30 NAME BRAND SPORTS SAFETY VESTS 10- 4642- 560 -56 NAME BRAND SPORTS SAFETY VESTS 10- 4642 - 646 -64- NAME BRAND SPORTS UNIFORMS 30- 4262- 784 -78 5479 SUE STEEN REFUND /SKATING 30- 3505 - 000 -00 CAREER TRACK DUES 10- 4202 - 440 -44 CONT CLAY CO CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 3036 3809 CONT CLAY CO CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588- 611 -61 3072 4627 CONT CLAY CO COST /COMM 23- 4624 - 613 - 61,3072 4627 CERAMIC ARTS /SUPP CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 17433 5081 BRAUN INTERTEC PRO ENG SERV 60- 1300 - 019 -19 3549 LARSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 5109 GE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 927417 5213 MODELED HORIZONS PRO SERVICES 30- 4201- 784 -78 5259 TELEDYNE TOTAL POWER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 331660 5269 DIANE KOOLE CONFERENCE 10,- 4202 - 200 -20 HENN CTY TREASURER CENSUS BULLETINS 10- 4502 - 120 -12 91 -76 5557 MN DEPT OF JOBS UNEMPL CHG 10- 4160 - 510 -51 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1ST HALF BALANCE 10- 4922 - 503 -50 GOPHER CASH REGISTER REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 12252 5404 GOPHER CASH REGISTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 784 -78 12218 5592 CAPRICE WERT CLEANING 27- 4201-662 -66 30620 3041 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO- DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182806 06/25/91 485.00 BRADS PRO.AUDIT PRO SERVICES 485.00 *" 182807 06/25/91 475.00 OMNI PRODUCTIONS PRO SERVICES 475.00 182808 06/25/91 109.20 MIDWEST VENDING FOOD 109.2.0 182809 06/25/91 25.00 ALISON WYSE REFUND /TENNIS 25.00 * 182810 06/25/91 30.00 ACT ELECTRINICS AC CHARGER 30.00 * 182811 06/25/91 79.65 CERAMIC TILE ART GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.65 * 182812 06/25/91 63.40 FAST 1 HR FOTO ADVERTISING 63.40 * 182813 06/25/91 137.50 EDINA ART FAIR CHEM AWARENESS 137.50 * 182814 06/25/91 1,091.00 DAVES HOME ABATEMENT ASBESTOS ABATE 1,091.00 * 182815 06/25/91 51.38 ANN WIDERSTORM ARTWORK SOLD 51.38 * 182816 06/25/91 17.50 DON PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 17.50 * 182817 06/25/91 28.00 POLLY WADSWORTH ART WORK SOLD 28.00 * 182818 06/25/91 58.42 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 58.42 * 182819 06/25/91 21.00 KAY SHARKEY ARTWORK SOLD 21.00 * 182820 06/25/91 30.77 JANE RIFFEY ART WORK SOLD 30.77 * 182821 06/25/91 11.90 SUZANNE NELSON ART WORK SOLD 11.90 * 182822 06/25/91 i36.40 JULIE GREENWOOD ART WORK SOLD 36.40 * 182823 06/25/91 11.20 EILEEN DARNELL ART WORK SOLD 11.20 * 182824 06/25/91 125.00 IMPULSE CONCEPT INC REPAIRS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4201- 784 -78 5408 30- 4201 - 784 -78 27- ,4624- 663 -66 5499 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 260 -26 9732 4503 23- 4504 - 613 -61 4568 5080 23- 4214- 611 -61 2222 5089 10- 4280- 504 -50 317119 5500 10- 4201 - 500 -50 4815 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT MISSIONS SERV SUPPLY 125.00 * 182825 06/25/91 5,013.63 BOOKS 10- 4502 - 420 -42 5,013.63 * 182826 06/25/91 70.97 STEVE STROH 70.97 * 182827 06/25/91 27.95 UNIFORMS 10- 4266 - 430 -42 27.95 * 182828 06/25/91 11.95 2422 BROWNNELLS INC 11.95 * 182.8.29 06/25/91 35.95 CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 35.95 * 182830 06/25/91 263.64 JAMES FISCHER 263.64 * 182831 06/25/91 31.50 CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 31.50 * 182832 06/25/91 64.18 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL 64.18 * 182833 06/25/91 403.75 TELETYPE SERVICE 10- 4268- 420 -42 403.75 * 182834 06/25/91 179.99 1794 4720 AUTO RACE 179.99 * 182835 06/25/91 81.99 EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 81.99 * 182836 06/25/91 18.75 182836 06/25/91 57.98 26- 4504 - 682 -68 76.73 * 182837 06/25/91 150.00 182837 06/25/91 180.00 330.00 * 182838 06/25/91 115.50 182838 06/25/91 23.50 139.00 * 182839 06/25/91 792.25 - 792.25 * 182840 06/25/91 574.00 574.00 * 182841 06/25/91 48.49 48.49 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 07 -01 -91 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE KUNDE CO INC OAK WILT PROGRAM 10- 4248 - 644 -64 MISSIONS SERV SUPPLY CASSETTE TAPES 10- 4504 - 100 -10 21576 4872 ANDERSON PUBLISHING BOOKS 10- 4502 - 420 -42 A -OK LOCKSMITH CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 STEVE STROH CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 SIGNATURE CONCEPT UNIFORMS 10- 4266 - 430 -42 2036 EDINA PET HOSPITAL PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 470 -47 2422 BROWNNELLS INC AMMUNITION 10- 4572- 420 -42 142659 5178 LAW ENFORCE RESOU CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 4060 ERIC KLEINBERG UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 JAMES FISCHER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 PHIL LARSEN CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 PHIL LARSEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE SERVICE 10- 4268 - 420 -42 1Q2168 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE SERVICE 10- 4268- 420 -42 1Q2169 AUTO RACE EQUIP_ MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 1794 4720 AUTO RACE EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 1853 MAB ENTERP INC EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 1722 5153 WARREN ANDERSON REDWOOD POSTS 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4633 POLLY PFEIFFER SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 1991 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. CHECK REGISTER 27- 4201 - 667 -66 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 627 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182842 06/25/91 256.00 10281 LUIS HERNANDEZ SERVICES 256.00 * 30- 4504 - 784 -78 182843 06/25/91 285.00 HOAGLUND WOODWORKING CABINET 4289 285.00 * 4289 27- 4306 - 664 -66 182844. 06/25/91 145.50 MPS INC EQUIP REPLACE 4289 145.50 * 182845 06/25/91 2,708.00 JOHNSON WROUGHT IRON REDWOOD BENCHES 2,708.00 * 182846 06/25/91 61.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN FERTILIZER 61.00 * 182847 06/25/91 100.00 RICHFIELD FLOWERS FLOWERS 100.00 * 182848 06/25/91 270.00 Q CUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 270.00 * 182849 06/25/91 58.48 SUSIE LUTTENEGGER SERVICES . 58.48 * 182850 06/25/91 2,800.00 ROBERT C KINGHORN TEE MARKER SIGNS 182850 06/25/91 2,800.00- ROBERT C KINGHORN TEE MARKER SIGN 182850 06/25/91 2,800.00 ROBERT C KINGHORN TEE MARKER SIGN 182850 06/25/91 2,800.00- ROBERT C KINGHORN TEE MARKER SIGN 182850 06/25/91 2,800.00 ROBERT C KINGHORN TEE MARKER SIGNS 2,800.00 * 182851 06/25/91 31.00 AMANDA STEMPEL CLASS CANCEL * k k * * k 31.00 * 182853 06/25/91 81.00 KRISTI BRUNS CLASS CANCEL 81.00 * 182854 06/25/91 14.00 CAROL CUTSHALL CLASS CANCEL 14.00 * 182855 06/25/91 22.00 ANNE MALM - HOSSFEID CLASS CANCEL 22.00 * 182856 06/25/91 30.00 GINA YORK - FEBRES CLASS CANCEL 30.00 * 182857 06/25/91 19.00 ELAINE LANG CLASS CANCEL 19.00 * 182858 06/25/91 17,.00 ELENA ADAMS. CLASS CANCEL 17.00 * 182859 06/25/91 480.00 GROUP PROMO SERVICE PRINTING 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500- 000 -00 23 -3500- 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 4600 - 611 -61 * * * -CKS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4201 - 667 -66 27- 4604 - 667 -66 627 5576 10- 4901 - 420 -42 27- 4604 - 664 -66 10281 4571 30- 4258 - 782 -78 30- 4560- 784 -78 18446 30- 4504 - 784 -78 10- 4201 - 600 -60 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4289 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4289 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4289 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4289 27- 4306 - 664 -66 4289 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500- 000 -00 23 -3500- 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 4600 - 611 -61 * * * -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182860 182861 182862 182863 182864 182865 182865 182866 182867 182867 182867 182868 182869 182870 182871 :::AO 9 182A09 * * * * ** 182A14 182A16 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/21/91 06/24/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 r AMOUNT 480.00 33.80 33.80 * 193.46 193.46 * 41.00 41.00 * 20.00 20.00 * 15.79 15.79 * 596.29 1,854.00 2,450.29 * 410.00 410.00 * 10.00- 10.00 10.00 10.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 33.61 33.61 * 145.00 145.00 * 100.00 100.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY ENGRAVING DAVID CARLSON SHIRLEY SCHLIEVERT JULIE SMEBY DREW HYKES WRIGHT LINE INC WRIGHT LINE INC FLOROCK NW INC RUTH SCHWARZROCK RUTH SCHWARZROCK RUTH SCHWARZROCK BANNERS TO GO ARROYO TIRE CO CURRAN V NIELSEN CO STEPHEN MARSTON 87.00 AAA 684.24 AAA 771.24 78.86 78.86 65.66 MEETING EXP CONT ED REFUND /SWIMMING REFUND /SWIMMING POOL SUPPLIES OFFICE CABINETS OFFICE CABINETS PAINT REFUND / PLAYGROUNG REFUND / PLAYGROUNG REFUND /PLAYGROUND PRINTING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR CABLE CONT ED LICENSE REG TE PLATES ACTION RENTAL CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES ADIRONDACK DIRECT REMODELING 07 -01 -91 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4206 - 430 -42 3014 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 3500- 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 625 -62 10- 4504- 260 -26 101115 4558 10- 4901 - 260 -26 101115 4558 30- 4544- 784 -78 152124 5326 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 30- 4600 - 781 -78 1889 27- 4540- 666 -66 43016 5596 27- 4248 - 661 -66 13681 5595 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4310 - 560 -56 28- 4504 - 702 -70 160960 4975 25- 4924 - 520 -52 235102 5574 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. # MESSAGE 65.66 " * ** -CKS 182A21 06/25/91 195.71 ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICE 30- 4304 - 782 -78 5577 182A21 06/21/91 499.01 ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICE 30- 4304 - 784 -78 5434 694.72 # R * k * k ' " "* -CKS 182A29 06/25/91 29.03 ALBINSON TACKS 10- 4604- 260 -26 026674 2457 182A29 06/21/91 180.47 ALBINSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 803 -80 20592 4694 209.50 " k k k * * k * *" -CKS 182A31 06/24/91 261.28 AIRSIGNAL PAGER SERVICE 10- 4226 - 420 -42 182A31 06/24/91 26.00 AIRSIGNAL PAGER SERVICE 10- 4248 - 540 -54 5355 182A31 06/24/91 6.50 AIRSIGNAL PAGER SERVICE 10- 4808- 260 -26 182A31 06/24/91 13.00 AIRSIGNAL PAGER SERVICE 12- 4248- 434 -43 5355 182A31 06/24/91 64.00 AIRSIGNAL PAGER SERVICE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 5355 370.78 " *RRR ** * *" -CKS 182A39 06/21/91 70.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 10- 4504 - 560 -56 15173 5023 182A39 06/21/91 114.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 10- 4540-560 -56 14827 5214 182A39 06/21/91 85.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15037 4932 182A39 06/21/91 35.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 14423 5005 182A39 06/21/91 11.56 ALTERNATOR REBUILD PILOT DRILL BIT 10- 4580 - 560 -56 7168 5122 182A39 06/21/91 171.24 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERYS 10- 4642 - 301 -30 7167 5122 486.80 *x * * *# **A-CKS 182A41 06/21/91 73.20 AMBASSADOR FOODS HOT DOGS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 182A41 06/25/91 963.54 AMBASSADOR FOODS MEAT 27- 4624- 663 -66 2688 1,036.74 " # R * * # # RRk -CKS 182A48 06/21/91 131.55 ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO MACH /EQUIP 30- 1340 - 782 -78 4081 131.55 * * * * R * "* -CKS 182A51 06/21/91 126.50 AMERICAN RED CROSS BOOKS 10- 4504 - 625 -62 09589 5403 126.50 * xxk # *k " "" -CKS 182A53 06/25/91 185.03 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 185.03 * 182A54 06/21/91 684.64 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 1991 CITY OF EDINA 41.00 CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 182A54 06/21/91 108.13 AAGARD GARBAGE. 10- 4250 - 440 -44 182A54 06/21/91 135.17 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 182A54 06/21/91 684.64 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 182A54 06/21/91 45.75 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250- 645 -64 182A54 06/21/91 45.75 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250- 645 -64 182A54 06/21/91 207.97 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 645 -64 182A54 06/21/91 54.07 AAGARD GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 182A54 06/21/91 162.20 AAGARD GARBAGE 26- 4250 - 682 -68 182A54 06/21/91 648.82 AAGARD GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 662 -66 182A54. 06/21/91 45.75 AAGARD GARBAGE 27- 4250- 664 -66 182A54 06/21/91 322.76 AAGARD GARBAGE 28- 4250 - 702 -70 182A54 06/21/91 428.22 AAGARD GARBAGE 30- 4250 - 782 -78 182A54 06/21/91 36.75 AAGARD GARBAGE 50- 4250 - 821 -82 182A54 06/21/91 63.78 AAGARD GARBAGE 50- 4250- 841 -84 182A,54 06/21/91 158.65 AAGARD GARBAGE 50- 4250 - 861 -86 AVR INC 3,833.05 " 40- 4528 - 803 -80 43899 4101 * R . RR*_CKS 182A96 06/21/91 41.00 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6996 41.00 RR ** *R "" "CKS 182A98 06/21/91 166.50 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 45342 4101 182A98 06/21/91 252.00 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 44062 4101 182A98 06/21/91 149.92 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 44539 182A98 06/21/91 206.50 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 44343 182A98 06/21/91 118.00 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 44930 182A98 06/21/91 525.00 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 44770 182A98 06/21/91 294.00 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 44016 4101 182A98 06/21/91 246.54 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 43835 4101 182A98 06/21/91 210.23 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 43899 4101 2,168.69 * 182A99 06/25/91 21.34 AXT -LYLE VENDING PRODUCT 29- 3442 - 721 -72 182A99 06/25/91 10.47 AXT -LYLE SUPPLIES 29- 4504 - 722 -72 31.81 * *R * *r* " "" -CKS 182B03 06/21/91 26.00 BENSON OPTICAL GLASSES 10- 4262- 301 -30 182803 06/21/91 42.50 BENSON OPTICAL FRAME 40- 4642- 801 -80 524668 4177 68.50 182804 06/24/91 4,138.56 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 10- 4524 - 314 -30 59238 4100 182604 06/24/91 2,511.36 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 10- 4524- 314 -30 59158 4100 182804 06/24/91 3,768.48 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 10- 4524 - 314 -30 59200 4100 182804 06/24/91 491.40 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS FINE MIX ASPAHLT 10- 4524 - 314 -30 59026 4200 182604 06/24/91 3,027.24 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 10 -4524- 314 -30 59159 4100 182804 06/24/91 5,445.54 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 10- 4524 - 314 -30 59160 4200 182804 06/24/91 1,140.48 BITUMINOUS RDWAYS ASPHALT 50- 1315 - 000 -00 59200 4100 20,523.06 " * * R * * R * "" -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 182807 06/24/91 35.70 MAUREEN BROCKWAY ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 35.70 * * " * *■ "" "-CKS 182814 06/21/91 23.61 BOYER TRUCK PARTS RING GEAR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 923544 5021 182614 06/21/91 203.46 BOYER TRUCK PARTS PUMP 10 -4540- 560 -56 723145 4937 182B14 06/21/91 192.74 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 923077 5041 182814 06/21/91 103.03 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SENDER 10- 4540- 560 -56 923889 5021 522.84 " *** -CKS 1828.18 06/21/91 469.15 BATTERY WAREHOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 105179 4857 182618 06/21/91 66.68 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BRAKE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 95490 5357 182818 06/21/91 .103.10 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 97768 4271 182B18 06/21/91 171.06 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 99792 4433 182618 06/21/91 29.96 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 96520 4180 182B18 06/21/91 61.42 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 101570 4702 182818 06/21/91 34.37 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107262 4903 182818 06/21/91 41.95 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 99446 535 182818 06/21/91 149.68 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 97758 4269 182818 06/21/91 48.09 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106869 5356 182818 06/21/91 83.90 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY. 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103789 4774 182618 06/21/91 180.50 BATTERY WAREHOUSE TIE DOWN STRAPS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 101760 4591 1,439.86 * * * * ** * *" -CKS 182B27 06/25/91 121.80 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 182B27 06/25/91 204.75 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 842 -84 182827 06/25/91 300.83 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626-862 -86 627.38 " * * * * ** *** -CKS 182B30 06/21/91 5.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 680641 182B30 06/25/91 15.64 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 677014 5145 182630 06/21/91 .438.04 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 677797 182B30 06/21/91 103.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 677794 182B30 06/21/91 7.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 600 -60 679573 182830 06/21/91 10.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 678674 4962 182B30 06/21/91 57.08 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 679682 182B30 06/25/91 41.73 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 681520 182830 06/25/91 264.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 677017 5146 182830 06/25/91- 303.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4902 - 436 -42 5145 182030 06/21/91 65.84 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 679383 5159 1,312.09 " 182031 0.6/24/91 12.60 BETSY BRYANT ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 12.60 182832 06/21/91 45.88 BEST LOCK OF MPLS. KEYS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 15685 4755 182832 06/21/91 23.60 BEST LOCK OF MPLS HARDWARE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 015963 5016 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182632 06/21/91 182632 06/21/91 182B32 06/25/91 182832 06/21/91 RRRR ** MPLS 182835 06/25/91 182635 06/25/91, RRRRR { 182B50 06/21/91 { { R R R R 182670 06/21/91 RRRRR R 015963 182B73 06/24/91 182873 06/24/91 182873 06/24/91 . 182673 06/24/91 182873 06/24/91 182673 06/24/91 182673 06/24/91 182673 06/24/91 182674 06/25/91 182674 06/24/91 RRRRR R 182879 06/21/91 RRRRR R 182881 06/25/91 182B82 06/24/91 182B82 06/21/91. RRRRR R 36.00 182693 06/21/91 CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 14 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAE 56.28 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS 10- 4540- 540 -.54 15884 4856 141.35 BEST LOCK OF MPLS HARDWARE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 015963 5016 40.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 661 -66 016443 5594 56.49 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 016162 5134 363.60 *A*-CKS 36.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 12809 5406 210.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERALS UPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 12796 5170 246.00 * * ** -CKS 371.45 BEST BUY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES X 26- 4504 - 682 -68 371.45 * " "* -CKS 573.50 BARRETT MOV /STORE MOVE VOTE EQUP 10- 4201 - 184 -18 C17911 573.50 " * ** -CKS 24.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE HANICAP REFUND 27- 3470 - 000 -00 175.92 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE UNIFORMS 27- 4262 - 663 -66 40.60 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE POSTAGE 27- 4290 - 661 -66 20.10 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 37.20 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 92.50 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE PLANTING 27- 4560- 664 -66 67.62 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 53.13 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COST /GOODS SOLD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 511.07 * 475.00 BRADLEY BENN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 45.50 BRADLEY BENN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 520.50 * ** *_CKS 192.00 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 343 -30 5152 192.00 * * ** -CKS 450.00 BRW INC. CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 003 -00 450.00 " 30.00 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 084058 2458 440.00 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 39718 4428 470.00 * * ** -CKS 832.43 BRC ELECT /MIDWEST PRINTING 10- 4600 - 184 -18 803418 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 832.43 RRRRRR . **,%-CKS 182898 06/25/91 415.70 BRIGADE UNIFORMS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 5433 415.70 R R R R R R * *" -CKS 18X01 •06/21/91 82.90 C.& S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 313 -61 123426 5084 182C01 06/21/91 82.90- C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 313 -61 123426 5084 182C01 06/21/91 82.90 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 123426 5084 82.90 R RRRR R T * ** -CKS 182C04 06/21/91 657:00 CAMPBELL SPORTS CAPS /JACKETS 27- 4262 - 683 -68 3097 5261 657.00 R R R R R R • * *" -CKS 182C09 06/21/91 222.35 CARLSON PRINTING REGISTRATION CARDS 10- 4504 - 600 -60 051059 5427 222.35 R R R R R R " *" -CKS 182C16 06/21/91 19.96 CATCO FILTER /GASKET 10- 4540 - 560 -56 372381 182C16 06/21/91 248.61 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 372189 5006 268.57 * 182C17 06/21/91 93.18 CDP RENTAL 10- 4504 - 540 -54 138048 93.18 * R R R R R R 182C22 06/21/91 64.46- CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 182C22 06/21/91 112.58 CERT POWER TRAIN BEARINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 77945 5036 182C22 06/21/91 64.46 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 75 182C22 06/21/91 64.46 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 75778 4022 177.04 R R R R R R * *" -CKS 182C25 06/21/91 59.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 182C25 06/24/91 106.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 182C25 06/25/91 48.45 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 213.45 * R R R R R R **A-CKS 182C31 06/21/91 31,349.25 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON HEALTH SERVICES 10- 4201 - 480 -48 13047 31,349.25 * 182C32 06/21/91 144.93 FRAN CALLAHAN MAY MILEAGE 10- 4208- 480 -48 144.93 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 182C33 06/24/91 14.50 182C33 06/25/91 14.50 - 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 197.10 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 - 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 182C33 06/25/91 754.65 182C33 06/25/91 21.60 EDINA WATER 1,081.35 * kkkk'k k EDINA WATER 182C35 06/25/91 121. -80 k k k k k k 121.80 * 182C38 06/25/91 284.00 182C38 06/21/91 82.75 182C38 06/21/91 22.45 10- 4504 - 482 -48 389.20 * kkkk *k PHOTGRAPHIC 182C65 06/21/91 49.00 182C65 06/21/91 50.70 10- 4620 - 560 -56 89158 99.70 * 182C78 06/24/91 163.03 163.03 * k k k k k k 182C87 06/25/91 571.64 182C87 06/25/91 37.64 182C87 06/25/91 113.79 182C87 06/24/91 3.08 726.15 * kkkkkk 182C91 06/25/91 120.00 k* k k k 4 120.00 * 182C93 06/21/91 274.46 274.46 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY OF EDINA CHAMBER LUNCH CITY OF EDINA CHAMBER LUNCH CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF, EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4206- 140 -14 10- 4206 - 140 -14 23- 4258- 612 -61 27- 4258- 662 -66 27- 4258 - 662 -66 27- 4258 - 662 -66 27- 4258- 664 -66 27- 4258 - 664 -66 28- 4258 - 702 -70 28- 4258 - 702 -70 30- 4258 - 782 -78 50- 4258- 841 -84 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 914 5579 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP 3 TARPS 10- 4504- 440 -44 1351B 4961 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP HELMET 10- 4574- 440 -44 1351 4961 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP EMBLEMS 10- 4574 - 440 -44 1351A 4961 CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR WORK 10- 4294 - 560 -56 20704 CONTACT MOBILE COMM GASKET /REPAIRS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 20667 CRESCENT ELECTRIC ELECTRIC PARTS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 62328 5020 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 5293 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 5293 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 482 -48 5371 CURTIN MATHESON SCI GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 5293 CUSTOM CAMERA PHOTGRAPHIC 10- 4508 - 420 -42 152173 5549 CERT HYD SPEC PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 89158 4920 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182D01 06/21/91 182D01 06/21/91 182D01 06/21/91 182D01 06/21/91 k k k k k k 96.41 182D19 06/25/91 k k k k k k * 182D26 06/24/91 k k k k k k GENERAL SUPPLIES 182D33 06/25/91 182D33 06/25/91 k k k k k k ART WORK SOLD 182D35 06/25/91 k i R i k i 182D52 06/21/91 182D52 06/21/91 R k k k k 182D58 06/25/91 k k k k k k 478.38 182D70- 06/21/91 182D70 06/21/91 182D70 06/21/91 k k k k k k 182D79 06/21/91 182D79 k k k R R i 06/21/91 07 -01 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * "* -CKS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4262- 782 -78 5404 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4262 - 782 -78 5404 26- 4504 - 682 -68 23 =3625- 000 -00 10- 4100 - 985 -90 10- 4208 - 985 -90 10- 4156- 510 -51 10- 4294 - 560 -56 12619 10- 4901- 305 -30 86106 10- 4288 - 420 -42 *** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * * * - C K S * ** -CKS *** -CKS 26- 4564- 682 -68 847341 40- 4622- 805 -80 847330 4103 40- 4622 - 805 -80 842848 4103 * ** -CKS 10- 4218 - 220 -22 241179 10- 4218 - 220 -22 241179 *** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 114.20 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 90.85 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 179.00 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 96.41 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 480.46 * 16.56 DANS REGISTER SERV. GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.56 * 67.55 TOBIE DICKER ART WORK SOLD 67.55 * 435.75 EUGENE DAVIS SERVICES 42.63 EUGENE DAVIS MILEAGE 478.38 * 2,328.00 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE 2_,328.00 * 286.25 DISPATCH COMM /MN MAINT CONTRACT 450.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN MVP MOBILE 736.25 * 1,977.00 DICTAPHONE CORP SERVICE CONTRACT 1,977.00 * 458.85 DPC INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS 1,473.34 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER CHEMICALS 910.39 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER CHEMICALS 2,842.58 * 17,408.31 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 16,949.47 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL' 34,357.78 * 07 -01 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * "* -CKS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4262- 782 -78 5404 30- 4262 - 782 -78 30- 4262 - 782 -78 5404 26- 4504 - 682 -68 23 =3625- 000 -00 10- 4100 - 985 -90 10- 4208 - 985 -90 10- 4156- 510 -51 10- 4294 - 560 -56 12619 10- 4901- 305 -30 86106 10- 4288 - 420 -42 *** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * * * - C K S * ** -CKS *** -CKS 26- 4564- 682 -68 847341 40- 4622- 805 -80 847330 4103 40- 4622 - 805 -80 842848 4103 * ** -CKS 10- 4218 - 220 -22 241179 10- 4218 - 220 -22 241179 *** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 18 CHECK REGISTER 40- 4544 - 802 -80 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 182D88 06/21/91 464.46 DUO CHEM PAINT 10-47-4-560-56 464.46 3303 RRRRRR * "* -CKS 10- 4504 - 621 -62 182D99 06/21/91 325.00 DIESEL INJECTN SPEC REPAIR PARTS 182D99 06/21/91 167.00 DIESEL INJECTN SPEC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4518 - 803 -80 492.00 RRRRRR * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 182E02 06/21/91 266.00 E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 182E02 06/21/91 401.39 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 182E02 06/21/91 133.00 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 182E02 06/21/91 268.87 E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 80179 1,069.26 " RRRRRR * ** -CKS 10 -4206- 140 -14 182E14 06/21/91 175.50 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN 182E14 06/21/91 265.80 EARL F. ANDERSON TRAFFIC PAINT 441.30 " 2348 R R R R R R 182E17 06/24/91 9,673.75 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 9,673.75 * 182E20 06/21/91 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT 85.00 * R R * R R R 182E33 06/25/91 14.50 EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER LUNCH R R R R R R 14.50 * 182E60 06/25/91 553.94 ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. REPAIRS. 553.94 * 182E66 06/21/91 64.50 EAGLE ELEVATOR MAINT 64.50 * R R R R R R 182E69 06/21/91 167.77 ELSMORE AQUATIC GUARD SUITS - 167.77 RRRRRR 07 -01 -91 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4544 - 802 -80 8651 4403 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10041 10-47-4-560-56 10066 3303 * "* -CKS 10- 4504 - 621 -62 18154 10- 4532 - 301 -30 18348 40- 4518 - 803 -80 18348 40- 4518 - 803 -80 18154 * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 106269 4825 10- 4544 - 335 -30 106146 4772 * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 80179 * ** -CKS 10 -4206- 140 -14 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 144894 5490' * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 2348 * ** =CKS 10- 4504 - 625 -62 014466 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA ,CHECK NO. DATE 182E75 06/21/91 CHECK REGISTER 182E81 06/21/91 RRR *kR PAGE 19 182E84 06/25/91 182E84 06/25/91 # MESSAGE 182E94 06/24/91 R k R * R * 10- 4504- 500 -50 182F20 06/21/91 k R * * * R 300.00 182F26 06/21/91 182F26 06/21/91 182F47 06/24/91 * * R R R * 182F76 06/21/91 182F76 06/21/91 182F76 06/21/91 R R k R k k 112148 182G09 06/21/91 *k * * ** 182G13 06/25/91 182G13 06/25/91 R R R R R k CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 19 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 500 -50 300.00 * *** -CKS 58.87- ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY TEC /BUSHING 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112148 58.87 * AAA-bKS 497.00 ENGLAND PRESS INC. PRINTING 27- 4600- 661 -66 514351 5224 488.00 ENGLAND PRESS INC. PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 514352 5352 985.00 aaa -CKS 496.00 ESS BROS & SONS CASTINGS 41 -4552- 900 -90 3857 5388 496.00 * ** -CKS 96.80 FAST FRAME OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 693823 96.80 * ** -CKS 233.08 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 4573 5358 2,030.33 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL SEWER RODS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 4548 4830 2,263.41 * a * a_CKS 36.85 FOWLER ELECTRIC GOLF CARS PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 264740 5497 36.85 * Kt. 5.62 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP GASKETS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4905 24.11 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4905 387.49 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5115 417.22 **A-CKS 69.00 GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED 12- 4202 - 434 -43 9079 69.00 CKS 476.65 GARTNER REFRIG INC. REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 5433 5561 477.40 GARTNER REFRIG INC. REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 5408 5169 954.05 AAA -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 182G29 06/24/91 651.46 R R R R R* 651.46 * 182G32 06/21/91 715.00 715.00 * * R * R R R 182G68 06/24/91 57.94 57.94 * * R R R R R 182H03 06/25/91 490.85 490.85 R R R R* R 182H09 06/21/91 413.80 182H09 06/21/91 111.00 182H09 06/21/91 300.00 R R * R * * 824.80 * 182H28 06/21/91 487.50 182H28 06/21/91 325.00- 162.50 * 182H30 06/25/91 189.85 189.85 * 182H31 06/21/91 10.79 182H31 06/21/91. 703.31 714.10 * R R R* R R 182H33 06/25/91 107.06 182H33 06/25/91 735.47 182H33 06/25/91 409.95 1,252.48 182H36 06/25/91 521.96 * * * * ** 521.96 182H62 06/25/91 16.84 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GENERAL REPAIR SERV REPAIR PARTS GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATES GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. TELEPHONE HYDRO SUPPLY CO HALLMAN HALLMAN HALLMAN HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP REPAIR PARTS ROTELLA OIL OIL GREASE GENERAL SUPPLIES CREDIT HARMON GLASS & GLAZE REPAIRS HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS GENERAL SUPPLIES HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS GENERAL SUPPLIES HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY MED CENTER EQUIP MAINT WORKHOUSE /JAIL EQUIP REPLACE 07 -01 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE .40- 4540 - 803 -80 22297 5373 *** -CKS 10- 4318 - 280 -28 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 287567 5127 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 3642 2439 * ** -CKS 10- 4618 - 560 -56 110775 5366 10- 4618- 560 -56 110408 4718 10- 4618 - 560 -56 110738 4754 40- 4504- 900 -90 10413 5101 40- 4504 - 900 -90 10418 5101 27- 4248 - 664 -66 5597 30- 4504 - 783 -78 7494 30- 4504 - 783 -78 7434 5262 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4286 - 220 -22 10- 4901 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 1265 2529 * ** -CKS HOFF MARKING DEVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES ' - 10- 4504 - 420 -42 18060 1991.CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * A A x 182H83 06/25/91 k * A x A * 182H99 06/24/91 RRAxx* 182I09 06/25/91 182I09 06/21/91 182I09 06/25/91 R * A R R * 182I71 06/21/91 182I71 06/21/91 R*** ** 182I77 06/21/91 R R R R R R 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 182J31 06/25/91 * R R * R 182J35 06/21/91 182J35 06/24/91 182J35 06/24/91 182J35 06/24/91 AMOUNT 16.84 * 120,000.00 120,000.00 * 99.40 99.40 " 100.00 100.00 46.00 246.00 461.29 39.90 501.19 * 60.10 60.10 * 92.78 26.00 132.00 66.72 77.88 41.12 52.23 26.35 68.34 21.33 45.14 236.46 134.43 28.51 1,049.29 289.20 27.99 27.99 27.99 373.17 " CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION HRA JEAN HAEFELE IAAO IAAO, IAAO IDELLES INTER DESN IDELLES INTER DESN ISI JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING HRA ADVANCE ART WORK SOLD DUES IAAO DUES PROP TAX JOURNAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CASE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTION FORMS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 07 -01 -91 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE *** -CKS 10- 1145- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 10- 4204 - 200 -20 10- 4204 - 200 -20 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4201 - 646 -64 249786 30- 4504- 782 -78 249784 10- 4540 - 560 -56 79823 5105 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504- 318 -30 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504- 520 -52 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4540.- 560 -56 10- 4580 - 644 -64 27- 4504 - 666 -66 27- 4580 - 664 -66 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4580- 801 -80 41- 4504 - 900 -90 10- 4504 - 490 -49 50- 4504 - 822 -82 7312 50- 4504 - 842 -84 7312 50- 4504 - 862 -86 7312 *** -CKS ** "-CKS -CKS * ** -CKS * "* -CKS *"* -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** -CKS 182J41 06/21/91 451.94 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 13581 1 4782 451.94 * * * * ** " "" -CKS 182J68 06/25/91 19.61 JOAN WATERSTREET PRO SERV 10- 4201 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 98.58 JOAN WATERSTREET CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 17.81 JOAN WATERSTREET MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 13.95 JOAN WATERSTREET MEETING EXP 10- 4206- 430 -42 182J68 06/25/91 38.29 JOAN WATERSTREET MILEAGE /PARKING 10- 4208 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 20.00 JOAN WATERSTREET UNIFORMS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 182368 06/25/91 4.89 JOAN WATERSTREET EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 71.37 JOAN WATERSTREET PHOTOGRAPHIC 10- 4504 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 156.84 JOAN WATERSTREET GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 24.50 JOAN WATERSTREET AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 182J68 06/25/91 4.68 JOAN WATERSTREET GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 470.52 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 182J74 06/21/91 142.95 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 90013 4853 182J74 06/21/91 118.77 JUSTUS LUMBER CEDAR LUMBER 10- 4504 - 318 -30 91333 5045 182J74 06/21/91 168.95 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 89960 4847 182J74 06/21/91 88.69 JUSTUS LUMBER OAK /FIR 10- 4540- 520 -52 89251 4740 182J74 06/21/91 64.85 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 89769 5367 182J74 06/21/91 72.59 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 27- 4604 - 664 -66 5025 4549 656.80 • * "* -CKS 182J97 06/21/91 16.71 JOANNA FOOTE MAGAZINE 12- 4215- 434 -43 182J97 06/21/91 19.30 JOANNA FOOTE PHOTO DEVELOPMENT 12- 4508 - 434 -43 36.01 * *" -CKS 182J99 06/25/91 40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE /LOGIS 10- 4208 - 160 -16 40.00 " k * * R R * ** -CKS 182K09 06/21/91 207.00 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 703581 4854 182K09 06/21/91 75.00 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 4854 282.00 * *" -CKS 182K17 06/24/91 175.06 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 136972 2697 182K17 06/25/91 182.21 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 142848 2697 357.27 " ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182K35 06/21/91 i i R i i i PAGE 23 182K51 06/21/91 182K51 06/21/91 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 182K97 06/21/91 MESSAGE 33.07 182L01 06/21/91 182L01 06/21/91 27- 4604 - 664 -66 201892 182L03 06/21/91 182L03 06/21/91 182L03 06/21/91 182L03 06/21/91 182L03 06/21/91 182L03 06/21/91 111111 182L05 06/21/91 182L06 06/24/91 182L06 06/21/91 k k i i i k 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 182L28 06/21/91 CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 23 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 33.07 KNOX LUMBER 27- 4604 - 664 -66 201892 33.07 * ** =CKS 454.00 KREMER SPRG & ALGN SPRINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27985 3393 175.00 KREMER SPRG & ALGN SPRING -LEAFS 10 -4540- 560 -56 28109 3498 629.00 * ** -CKS 30.00 KANDIYOHI /WATER PRO SERVICES 23- 4201- 612 -61 30.00 * ** -CKS 34.98 LINDA KOZAK GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 =4504- 783 -78 23.13 LINDA KOZAK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30 -4516- 781 -78 58.11 * ** -CKS 190.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 4680 43.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 27- 4560 - 664 -66 5234 69.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 27- 4560- 664 -66 5353 170.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 27- 4560 - 664 -66 4528 489.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 27- 4560 - 664 -66 494.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTS 27- 4560- 664 -66 5232 1,455.00 * * ** =CKS 25.34 LAURA HINTON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 25.34 * 2,108.30 LAKE RESTORATION DNR PERMITS 41- 4201 - 902 -90 E9150 5381 3,845.00 LAKE RESTORATION LAKE TREATMENT 41- 4201- 902 -90 1772 4581 5,953.30 * ** -CKS 8.37 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERALSUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 299.09 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 4686 435.36 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 4925 238.99 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 4928 380.60 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4690 428.95 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4936 436.82 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4790 211.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 343 -30 4939 354.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 4789 333.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 4923 12.22 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 4508 130.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 4689 324.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS. 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4926 1991 CITY OF EDINA 343.23 CHECK REGISTER DATA PROCESSING 07 -01 -91 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 182L28 06/21/91 366.60 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 4580- 301 -30 10- 4233 - 200 -20 4929 182L28 06/21/91 194.83 LOGIS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 182L60 4690 182L28 06/21/91 213.84 DATA LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 06/21/91 4936 182L28 06/21/91 184.69 PROCESSING LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 349.25 4927 182L28 06/21/91 357.59 50- 4233 - 840 -84 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 4691 182L28 06/21/91 483.26 LAWSON PRODUCTS TIE STRAP 40- 4504 - 806 -80 4588 182L28 06/21/91 487.08 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4691 182L28 06/21/91 483.43 366.70 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126303 4915 4687 182L28 06/21/91 413.45 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 4788 505.98 " 6,779.16 * ** * ** * ** -CKS 182L70 06/24/91 45.00 " "" -CKS 18204 06/21/91 28.99 LEEF BROS. INC. PRO SERVICE 23- 4201 - 612 -61 28.99 " * * * * ** **A-CKS 182L56 06/21/91 5.80 LINHOFF PHOTOS 10- 4508 - 120 -12 192876 182L56 06/21/91 17.54 LINHOFF PHOTOS 10- 4508 - 440 -44 191253 182L56 06/21/91 19.19 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 440 -44 191065 182L56 06/21/91 135.00 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 10-4508- 510 -51 191065 182L56 06/24/91 6.75 LINHOFF PRINTING 10- 4600 - 510 -51 191063 182L56 06/21/91 53.90 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 12 -4508- 434 -43 191065 182L56 06/21/91 19.20 LINHOFF PHOTO PROCESSING 12- 4508 - 434 -43 190706 182L56 06/21/91 4.95 LINHOFF PHOTO PROCESSING 12- 4508 - 434 -43 190762 182L56 06/21/91 47.00 LINHOFF PHOTO PROCESSING 30- 4508 - 781 -78 191088 182L56 06/21/91 45.00 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 30- 4508 - 781 -78 191065 182L56 06/24/91 10.09 LINHOFF PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 192032 364.42 " "" -CKS 182L60 06/21/91 343.23 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 1145- 000 -00 182L60 06/21/91 3,382.08 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 160 -16 182L60 06/21/91 2,795.08 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 200 -20 182L60 06/21/91 4,694.30 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 182L60 06/21/91 2,049..89 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 40- 4233 - 800 -80 182L60 06/21/91 344.85 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 182L60 06/21/91 349.25 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 840 -84 182L60 06/21/91 375.53 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50= 4233 - 862 -86 14,334.21 " " "" -CKS 182L66 06/21/91 366.70 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126303 4915 182L66 06/21/91 139.28 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT KITS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126075 4912 505.98 " * ** -CKS 182L70 06/24/91 45.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30619 1470 45.00 " " "" -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182L80 06/24/91 182L80 06/24/91 * * * * ** 182M03 06/21/91 182M04 06/21/91 182M04 06/21/91 182M04 06/21/91 182M07 06/21/91 182M07 06/21/91 * * * * ** MERIT 182M16 06/21/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 182M19 06/24/91 * * * * ** 182M22 06/21/91 * * * * * * 30- 4504 - 784 -78 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/24/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/21/91 182M27 06/25/91 AMOUNT 37.95 24.15 62.10 * 1,931.80 1,931.80 * 342.24 261.33 209.25 812.82 * 10,392.01 110.30 10,502.31 * 65.25 65.25 * 396.52 45.63 2,560.44 92.19 946.85 210.63 119.64 132.03 4,503.93 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES MN STATE TREA /BLG IN MAGNUSON SOD CO. MAGNUSON SOD CO. MAGNUSON SOD CO. MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES McCAREN DESIGNS MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY STATE SURCHARGE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BEER MIX PLANTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504- 782 -78 51129 5233 30- 4504 - 782 -78 51361 6328 10- 3113 - 000 -00 10- 4504- 318 -30 10 -4562- 643 -64 40- 4504 - 803 -80 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632- 862 -86 30- 4560 - 782 -78 5084 10- 4504- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4580 - 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 30- 4504- 784 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4540 - 803 -80 96.06 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 137856 5007 96.06 " 192.00 MERIT SUPPLY BUG STOP 10- 4504 - 301 -30 27211 5110 107.00 MERIT SUPPLY TOWEL 10- 4512- 540 -54 27253 5196 475.70 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27269 5246 991.20 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27157 4949 480.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27315 5428 974.95 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 27241 5069 479.30 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 782 -78 27261 5254 477.95 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 27225 5227 390.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 784 -78 27256 .5235 452.40 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 784 -78 27350 5486 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS *** -CKS * ** -CKS **k-CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07701 -91 PAGE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 182M27 06/21/91 479.10 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 784 -78 27292 5402 182M27 06/21/91 471.25 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 801 -80 27156 4898 182M27 06/21/91 490.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 27227 5185 6,461.05 * * * *** * ** -CKS 182M32 06/25/91 54,453_.50 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 5950 182M32 06/25/91 453.50 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 5950 182M32 06/25/91 54,453.50- M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 5950 182M32 06/21/91 384.34 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 842 -84 5815 182M32 06/25/91 453.19 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 5987 182M32 06/25/91 585.00 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 5956 1,876.03 * ** -CKS 182M35 06/21/91 226,698.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 505041 226,698.00 * 182M36 06/21/91 328.33 MINVALCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 5198 328.33 * ** * * ** *** -CKS 182M42 06/21/91 24.89 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 182M42 06/24/91 71.65 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.- GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 314 -30 1593 182M42 06/21/91 15.95 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERALSUPPLIES' 10- 4504 - 314 -30 182M42 06/21/91 88.93 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 314 -30 182M42 06/21/91 1,036.01. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4504- 621 -62 5648 4099 182M42 06/21/91 2,645.58 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 5648 4099 182M42 06/21/91 211.47 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 5704 4099 182M42 06/24/91 355.74 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. ASPHALT 10- 4524 - 301 -30 5802 4099 182M42 06/21/91 569.15 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 5750 4099 182M42 06/21/91 3,374.49 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 5648 4099 182M42 06/21/91 5,132.82 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 5704 4099 182M42 06/24/91 149.73 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. ASPHALT 1074524 - 314 -30 40747 4099 182M42 06/21/91 8,073.66 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 5750 4099 182M42 06/21/91 51.41 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 182M42 06/21/91 84.35 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 182M42 06/21/91 106.34 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 5704 4099 182M42 06/21/91 126.18 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 5648 4099 182M42 06/24/91 32.63 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. SUPPLIES 41- 4518- 900 -90 1593 182M42 06/21/91 96.60 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 50- 4540 - 841 -84 5648 4099 22,247.58 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 182M46 06/21/91 32.00 METZ BAKING CO HOT DOG BUNS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 4493 182M46 06/24/91 212.88 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 182M46 06/24/91 194.99 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 439.87 lY RtY Y I R * ** -CKS 182M58 06/21/91 273.00 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 163450 4783 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE R R R R R R 182M60 R R R R R R 182M63 182M63 182M64 R R k R R R 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M68 182M69 182M69 182M70 RRRRRR 182M74 182M80 182M80 182M80 182M80 182M81 182M81 182M81 182M81 182M81. 182M81 06/21/91 AMOUNT 273.00 13.60 13.60 CHECK 'REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MILWAUKEE TOOL CO. TOOL PARTS 06/21/91 175.50 MN. BAR MIX 06/21/91 499.87 MN. BAR MIX 675.37 * 06/21/91 177.75 MN. BEARING CO. CHAIN 177.75 * 07 -01 -91 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10 -4580- 301 -30 5097 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4892 06/25/91 226.34 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 06/25/91 9.13 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 06/25/91 34.73 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 06/25/91 160.67 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 06/25/91 36.15 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 06/25/91 12.51 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 06/25/91 49.21 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 06/25/91 1,110.57 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 10- 4226- 436 -42 06/21/91 55.35 CELLULAR ONE AIR TIME 40- 4504 - 801 -80 TORO INC. 1,694.66 * 10- 4540 - 560 -56 195281.4612 06/21/91 06/21/91 80.10 MCC /MIDWEST CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 54846 4624 06/21/91 135.37 MCC /MIDWEST COST /COMM 23- 4624 - 613 -61 54846 4624 REPAIR PARTS 215.47 * 195064 5108 06/21/91 28.29 06/25/91 570.25 MN. CONWAY FASULO GEAR 10- 4574 - 440 -44 17677 4971 06/21/91 570.25 * MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 06/21/91 93.00 METRO ELECTRIC SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 784 -78 013454 93.00 * - 06/21/91 75.64 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 06/21/91 33.48 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 06/21/91 27.86 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 40-4210-140-14 06/21/91 67.20 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 204.18 06/21/91 123.07 MN. TORO INC. BLADE 10- 4540- 560 -56 188817 06/21/91 100.43 MN. TORO INC. TINE SHAFT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 195281.4612 06/21/91 9.13 MN. TORO INC. FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 196319 5074 06/21/91 76.07 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 195064 5108 06/21/91 28.29 MN. TORO INC. BLADE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 190801 06/21/91 15.73 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 189093 * ** -CKS s * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182M81 06/21/91 182M81 06/24/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 182M81 06/25/91 * k * * k k 182M85 06/21/91 182M85 06/21/91 182M85 06/24/91 182M85 06/21/91 182M85 06/21/91 182M93 06/24/91 182M93 06/24/91 182M93 06/21/91 * * * * k * REPAIR 182M97 06/21/91 TORO INC. 182NO3 06/24/91 k * k * k * TORO'INC. 182N07 06/21/91 k * * * * * 182NO9 06/21/91 182N09 06/21/91 182N10 06/21/91 182N12 06/24/91 AMOUNT 79.50 79.50- 172.11 107.72 32.80 34.96 34.96 100.43 21.42 39.76 896.88 28.24 48.80 79.50 49.00 470.00 675.54 918.00 918.00 1,224.00 3,060.00 4,827.84 4,827.84 870.00 870.00 87.25 87.25 53.50 110.00 163.50 * 195.07 195.07 * 1.539.04 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN. TORO INC. PARTS MN. TORO INC. PARTS MN. TORO INC.. IRRIGATION PARTS MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN.. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. TORO'INC. REPAIR PARTS MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INC MPLS FINANCE DEPT MPLS SEWER & WATER MTS NW SOUND MUNICILITE CO. MUNICILITE CO. NORTHERN HYDRAULICS MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE GAUGE REPAIR PARTS PARTS REPAIRS TOOLS 3 -PORT RADIO 3 -PORT RADIO PORTABLE - RADIOS WATER PURCHASED REPAIRS SERVICE CONTRACT 07 -01 -91 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4620- 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 30- 4540 - 784 -78 30- 4540 - 784 -78 30- 4540- 784 -78 30- 4540 - 784 -78 30- 4540- 784 -78 77987 77987 198519 5245 198013 5257 199308 5062 199309 5074 199351 5074 199184 5074 197494 5074 199350 5074 10- 4504 - 560 -56 78353 10- 4540 - 560 -56 78039 10- 4620- 560 -56 77987 26- 4248 - 682 -68 078368 30- 4580 - 784 -78 078387 5435 10- 4901 - 305 -30 693525 4420 10- 4901 - 490 -49 693525 4420 40- 1340 - 000 -00 693526 4608 40- 4640- 803 -80 40- 4248 - 803 -80 30776 5359 30- 4288 - 782 -78 93342 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS REPAIR WORK 10- 4620- 560 -56 2992 5009 FLASH TUBE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2946 4532 TARP 10- 4504 - 301 -30 4846 * ** -CKS INSURANCE 10- 4158 - 510 -51 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1,539.04 " 182N13 06/25/91 47.80 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 182N13 06/25/91 47.80 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 862 -86 95.60 * * * * * ** • * *" -CKS 182N16 06/25/91 47.80- NSP ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 182N16 06/25/91 47.80 NSP ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86 .00 **A-CKS 182N31 06/21/91 162.75 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 040500 3715 182N31 06/25/91 50.00 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING POPCORN BOXES 26- 4624 - 683 -68 041001 182N31 06/25/91 55.50 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 041000 268.25 " * * * * ** " "" -CKS 182N37 06/21/91 357.75 NFPA NATL FIRE CODES 10- 4650 - 440 -44 4968 357.75 " 1,82N38 06/25/91 125.25 NO COUNTRY FLAGS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 025955 125.25 * * * * ** " "* -CKS 182N48 06/21/91 17.00 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 335760 5325 182N48 06/21/91 180.90 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 332050 5167 197.90 " * * * * ** * "" -CKS 182N72 06/21/91 661.24 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616- 560 -56 661.24 " * "" -CKS 182N76 06/24/91 50.79 NTCC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 5128 50.79 " * * * * ** " "" -CKS 182N82 06/24/91 130.81 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 185388 5310 182N82 06/21/91 121.50 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 184877 3805 182N82 06/21/91 262.98 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 185193 5083 515.29 - " "" -CKS 182N89 06/24/91 491.40 NEWMAN TRAFFIE SIGN SIGN BLANKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 36860 4841 182N89 06/24/91 491.40 NEWMAN TRAFFIE SIGN SIGN BLANKS 10- 4542-325 -30 36861 4840 982.80 * - 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION k k k k k k 182N96 06/21/91 23.28 MINN COMM PAGING SERV /RENTAL 23.28 * 182N97 06/25/91 121.00 LIA NICKLOW AC PT MAINT 121.00 * :82N99 06/25/91 43.65 NAOMI JOHNSON ADVERTISING 182N99 06/25/91 21.13 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 182N99 06/25/91 10.00 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 182N99 06/25/91 58.70 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 182N99 06/25/91 15.00 NAOMI JOHNSON PRINTING k k k k k k 148.48 182017 06/25/91 1,969.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 182017 06/25/91 1,975.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 182017 06/25/91 268.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 4,212.00 * k k * k k k 182037 06/21/91 153.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 153.00 * 182050 06/21/91 744.50 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONTRACT 744.50 k k k k k k 182P03 06/24/91 2,313.70 PACE LAB WATER TESTING 2,313.70." k k k k k k - 182P08 06/25/91 3,200.00 PERKINS LSCAPE CONST CONSTRUCTION 3,200.00 kkkkkk 182P11 06/25/91 150.00 PARK NIC MED CTR MED EXAM 182P11 06/25/91 52..00 PARK NIC MED CTR MED EXAM 182P11 06/25/91 54.00 PARK NIC MED CTR MED EXAM 256.00 * 182P12 06/21/91 751.62 PRECISION TURF /CHEM FERTILIZER 751.62 * 07 -01 -91 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** =CKS 10- 4226 - 301 -30 6581 23- 4120 - 612 -61 " ** -CKS 23- 4214- 611 -61 23- 4504- 611 -61 23- 4504 - 612 -61 23- 4588- 611 -61 23- 4600 - 611 -61 *** -CKS 10- 4901 - 140 -14 141452 5230 10- 4902 - 500 -50 141238 5049 10- 4902 - 500 -50 141453 5229 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 4113 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 56593 2262 * ** -CKS 40- 4201 - 803 -80 5411 * ** -CKS 27- 4306 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4201- 440 -44 10- 4246 - 300 -30 10- 4246- 800 -80 30- 4558- 782 -78 030391 5183 kkk -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182P30 06/21/91 RRR * *R 182P35 06/24/91 182P35 06/24/91 182P35 06/24/91 182P35 06/24/91 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 182P36 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 06/25/91 * R R R R 182P46 06/24/91 182P46 06/21/91 R R R R R R 182P98 06/24/91 182P98 06/24/ °1 182P98 06/24/91 AMOUNT 174.35 174.35 29.00 34.29 61.70 42.05 167.04 1.05 16.06 59.17 18.00 13.00 25.00 5.60 73.86 6.50 22.50 12.38 25.00 16.77 •5.35 4.00 8.51 12.25 4.00 2.00 9.53 6.72 19.05 18.50 47.56 5.00 4.59 3.73 10.78 12.89 7.40 476.75 828.85 2.35 831.20 98.12 118.80 89.83 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON - BARBARA PETERSON - BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PIONEER RIM & WHEEL PIONEER RIM & WHEEL MOLLIE PAULSON MOLLIE PAULSON MOLLIE PAULSON MIX POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC REFUND LUNCH /FINANCE CONFERENCE CONT ED CONFERENCE SUPPLIES METG /ADM MILEAGE MTG EXP MILEAGE MTG /FINANCE MTG EXP MILEAGE PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD PERSONNEL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 07 -01 -91 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4632- 822 -82 30- 4290 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30 -4504- 782 -78 30 -4516- 781 -78 10- 3350- 160 -16 10- 4202 - 160 -16 10- 4202 - 200 -20 10- 4202- 440 -44 10- 4202 - 504 -50 10- 4204 - 280 -28 10- 4206 - 100 -10 10- 4206- 140 -14 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 420 -42 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 800 -80 10- 4208 - 120 -12 10- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 200 -20 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4502 - 140 -14 10- 4504- 140 -14 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 624 -60 10- 4504- 644 -64 10- 4504 - 800 -80 10- 4508 - 627 -60 28- 4504 - 702 -70 29- 46.24- 722 -72 50- 4626- 840 -84 10- 4540 - 560 -56 223339 5282 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5042 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 4120- 613 -61 23- 4516- 611 -61 ** *CKS';. * ** -CKS * "" =CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 32 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 306.75 * *" -CKS 182R21 06/21/91 292.40 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 301 -30 228415 182R21 06/21/91 217.60 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 301 -30 228416 182R21 06/21/91 113.90 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642- 301 -30 228414 182R21 06/21/91 462.30 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 646 -64 228414 182R21 06/21/91 95.20 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 646 -64 228387 182R21 06/21/91 175.10 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642- 646 -64 228415 182R21 06/21/91 66.30 RED WING SHOES SHOES 40- 4642- 801 -80 228415 .1,422.80 * 182R22 06/21/91 72.30 REM.SUPPLIES GLOVES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1463 5037 1828.22 06/21/91 486.51 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 1533 5424 558.81 * * *" -CKS 182R31 06/25/91 114.00 RETAIL DATA SYS MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 702 -70 6897 5351 114.00 " *A*-CKS 182R33 06/21/91 5,064.05 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 182R33 06/21/91 7,215.63 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 182R33 06/21/91 168.50 REX DISTR. MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 12,448.18 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 182R42 06/21/91 3,712.00 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER PRO ENG SERV 25- 4900 - 004 -54 10198 3,712.00 * * ** -CKS 182R47 06/21/91 210.57 ROAD MACHINERY BEARINGS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 4737 182R47 06/21/91 184.95 ROAD MACHINERY BEARINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4849 182R47 06/21/91 290.89 ROAD MACHINERY BEARINGS 10- 4620- 560 -56 4849 182R47 06/21/91 450.96 ROAD MACHINERY BEARINGS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 4859 1,137.37 * ** -CKS 182R49 06/21/91 31.89 ROAD RESCUE LENS CAP 10- 4504 - 440 -44 102536 4965 31.89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 182R51 06/25/91 277.70 RFG PET & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 277.70 * ** -CKS 182R53 06/25/91 369.00 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 44831 54985 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 369.00 * * * * * * 182R63 06/25/91 1,250.00 ROGERS PAINTING REPAIRS 1,250.00 182R65 06/21/91 1,701.60 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 182R65 06/21/91 3,674.80 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 182R65 06/25/91 442.95 ROLLINS OIL CO REPAIRS 5,819.35 * * * * ** 182R79 06/25/91 1,002.75 RTW INC FEE FOR SERVICE 1,002.75 * * * * ** 182R81 06/24/91 45.51 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST /GOODS SOLD * * * * ** 45.51 182R98 06/21/91 840.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL SERVICES' * ** * ** 840.00 182S07 06/21/91 14.39 SPRUCE CO LAUNDRY 14.39 * * * * * * 182S10 06/21/91 413.28 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO EAGLE GT TIRES 413.28 182S13 06/25/91 60.00 SIGN -TI -FIC MTG EXP 182S13 06/25/91 60.00 SIGN -TI -FIC• MTG EXP 182S13 06/21/91 50.00 SIGN -TI -FIC PRINTING 182S13 06/21/91 66.00 SIGN -TI -FIC SIGNS 236.00 182S18 06/25/91 145.00 STERLING FENCE INC REPAIRS 182518 06/21/91 2,120.00 STERLING FENCE INC REPLACE FENCE 2,265.00 * 182S19 06/21/91 575.94 SEELYE PLASTICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 575.94 * 07 -01 -91 PAGE 33 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 4654 * ** -CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 29442 10- 4612- 560 -56 29441 28- 4248 - 704 -70 7193 5416 10- 4260 - 510 -51 i J . -CKS 23- 4624- 613 -61 195903 5315 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 **k-CKS 10- 4616 - 560 -56 17666 44978 * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 430 -42 015447 10- 4206 - 430 -42 15354 10- 4600 - 510 -51 015449 50- 4214 - 822 -82 015364 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 10622 5504 40- 4248 - 804 -80 10621 4.776 40- 4504 - 801 -80 198989 4921 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 34 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE RRRRR R * +" -CKS 182S24 06/25/91 25.00 SESAC DUES 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2161 25.00 " 182S25 06/24/91 111.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 26- 4624 - 683 -68 9930 182S25 06/21/91 74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC - COOKIES 26- 4624 - 683 -68 9791 182S25 06/21/91 31.50 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 26- 4624 - 683 -68 9743 182S25 06/24/91 111.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 26- 4624- 683 -68 9857 182S25 06/25/91 74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 9927 4458 182S25 06/24/91 74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 27- 4624 - 663 -66 9818 4458 475.50 " RRRRR R .. " *" -CKS 182S36 06/21/91 7,275.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50 -4630- 822 -82 182S36 06/21/91 15,177.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 182S36 .06/21/91 10.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 182S36 06/21/91 185.30 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 22,649.90 " RRRRRR " "" -CKS 182556 06/21/91 21.34 STARK ELECTRONICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4738 21.34 " RRRRRR -CKS 182572 06/25/91 147.00 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 205032 5077 182S72 06/25/91 41.00 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 5077 .182S72- 06/25/91 53.50 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 M73627 241.50 * R R R R R " "" -CKS 182S77 06/21/91 441.46 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 122132 182577 06/21/91 108.43 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 122735 182S77 06/21/91 95.92 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147270 182S77 06/21/91 20.39 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET MOUNT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147805 182S77 06/21/91 42.01 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SWITCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146810 182S77 06/21/91 6.08 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SWITCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147535 182577 06/21/91 22.83 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147584 182S77 06/21/91 153.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PUMP 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147288 890.12 * 182S78 06/24/91 97.31 SPS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 5295 182578 06/21/91 453.48 SPS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 5106 550.79 * RRRRR R **A-CKS 182S83 06/21/91 116.21 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 116.21 RRRRR R " "" -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182S87 06/21/91 182S87 06/21/91 * * * * ** 182S89 06/25/91 * * * * ** 182T03 06/24/91 182704 06/21/91 182T05 06/24/91 * ** * ** 182T10 06/24/91 182T11 06/21/91 182T11 06/21/91 * ** * ** 182T13 06/25/91 182T13 06/25/91 182T26 06/25/91 182T26 06/25/91 182T26 06/25/91 182T26 06/21/91 * ** * ** 182T40 06/21/91 182T40 06/21/91 182T40 06/21/91 182T40 06/21/91 182T40 06/21/91 * * * * ** 182T50 06/21/91 AMOUNT 5,750.00 5,383.81 .11,133.81 * 49.30 49.30 * 56.50 56.50 * 44.00 44.00 * 36.00 36.00 * 206.80 206.80 * 121.00 164.50 285.50 * 1,045.20 95.88 1,141.08 * 481.83 468.89 256.00 540.67 1,747.39 70.55 28.40 190.06 52.29 12.63 353.93 144.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SW SUB CABLE COMM 4TH QTR PROGAM SW SUB CABLE COMM 3RD QTR PROGRAM SMITH WESSON TARGET TAYLOR SALES THE PRINT SHOP TERRY ANN SALES CO TESSMAN SEED INC TESSMAN SEED INC TOM HORWATH TOM HORWATH THERMAL CO THERMAL CO THERMAL CO THERMAL CO TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE AMMUNITION GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFT SERV REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER PRODUCTS SEED FERTILIZER FORESTRY MILEAGE REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS EQUIPMENT GASEOUS CYLINDERS OXYGEN /CUP CYLINDERS WELDING SUPPLIES FUEL REPAIR PARTS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 35 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 12 -4224- 434 -43 12- 4224 - 434 -43 * *" -CKS 10- 4572 - 420 =42 096701 *** -CKS 26- 4504- 682 -68 257027 26 -4248- 683 -68 61932 10- 4504 - 504 -50 98834 27- 4504 - 663 -66 1175 5498 10- 4504- 301 -30 84845 4589 30- 4558- 782 -78 87675 5397 10- 4201- 644 -64 10- 4208 - 644 -64 28- 4248 - 704 -70 517050 5171 28- 4248 - 704 -70 70685 5308 28- 4248 - 704 -70 5400 30- 1340 - 000 -00 S16999 5079 10- 4610 - 560 -56 411106 10- 4610- 560 -56 131702 5094 10- 4616 - 560 -56 130509 4848 27- 4580 - 664 -66 133025 5241 30 -4254- 782 -78 132498 10- 4540- 560 -56 80748 5270 1991 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 36 CHECK REGISTER # P.O. CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 .144.00 5085 23- 4588 - 611 -61 51278 4881 182T66 06/21/91 39.35 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 182T66 06/21/91 32.56 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 10- 4540- 520 -52 71.91 kk k'k*k * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 182T96 06/21/91 148.50 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 182T96 06/21/91 148.50 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 182T96 06/21/91 148.50- TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4266- 430 -42 148.50 10- 4504 - 470 -47 10- 4901 - 420 -42 182U05 06/21/91 26.20 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE 182U05 06/24/91 348.79 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 10- 4540- 520 -52 374.99 10- 4540 - 520 -52 k * k k * 5206 10- 4540 - 520 -52 182U08 06/25/91 1,285.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 182U08 06/25/91 168.75 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 182U08 06/25/91 100.10 UNIFORM UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 182U08 06/25/91 820.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED EQUIPMENT 182U08 06/24/91 22.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 664 -66 2,395.85 * * * *kk * ** -CKS 10- 4510- 440 -44 '182U14 06/24/91 26.23 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/24/91 55.86 UNITED ELECTRIC -CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 439.12 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 58.21 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 355.96 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 114.86 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 27.22 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 182U14 06/21/91 44.29 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 1,121.75 * k k k k k k 182U20 06/25/91 7,000.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN SCHOOL k k k* k k 7,000.00 * 182U25 06/21/91 24.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 182U25 06/25/91 48.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 182U25 06/25/91 3,485.76 UNIVERSAL MED SERV EQUIP REPLACE 3,557.76 k * k k * * 07 -01 -91 PAGE 36 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 433997 5085 23- 4588 - 611 -61 51278 4881 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 182 10- 4540 - 520 -52 20008 10- 4540- 520 -52 182 * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 30- 4256- 784 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266- 430 -42 10- 4504 - 470 -47 10- 4901 - 420 -42 30- 4504 - 784 -78 17426 5543 * ** -CKS 10- 4540- 520 -52 5267 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5206 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5276 10- 4540 - 540 -54 4916 10- 4540- 540 -54 5031 10 -4540- 540 -54 4726 10- 4540 - 646 -64 4597 50- 4540 - 841 -84 4832 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4510- 440 -44 762598 2531 10- 4510 - 440 -44 762282 2531 10- 4901 - 420 -42 4841 5071 * ** -CKS AMOUNT 454.68 454.68 909.36 * 468.85 468.85 * 150.42 150.42 * 316.08 316.08 * 156.00 19.96 256.70 118.80 551.46 285.02 148.32 494;38 212.05 1,139.77 118.60 82.50 1,329.64 2,400.00 3,930.74 171.00 171.00 219.83 219.83 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION UNISTRUT NORTHERN POST MATERIAL UNISTRUT NORTHERN POST MATERIAL VAN PAPER CO VANTAGE ELECTRIC VESSCO VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALDOR PUMP .& EQUIP WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WARNING LITES /MN WARNER IND SUPPLY SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 37 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4441 10- 4542 - 325 -30 4418 * ** -CKS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 363306 5350 * ** -CKS 30 -4504- 782 -78 11646 5425 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 9704 5104 k * k -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 287732 4781 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 288120 4917 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 287826 3389 LAMPS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 289883 4844 * ** -CKS FIXTURES 10- 4540 - 440 -40 241166 4777 LAMP 10- 4540 - 646 -64 960652 4777 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 250796 5194 TOOLS 40- 4580- 801 -80 657784 4753 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 15083 5466 REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 15096 5467 REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 6961 5206 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 15180 5105 * ** -CKS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1337 4710 BUG SPRAYER 10- 4580 - 301 -30 5112 * ** -CKS * *k -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 182U99 06/24/91 182U99 06/24/91 k k k k k k 182V15 06/21/91 k k k k k k 182V30 06/21/91 k k k t k 182V46 06/24/91 k k k k k k 182V80 06/21/91 182V80 06/21/91 182V80 06/21/91 182V80 06/21/91 k k k k k k 182WO8 06/21/91 182WO8 06/21/91 182WO8 06/21/91 182WO8 06/21/91 k k k k k k 182W13 06/24/91 182W13 06/24/91 182W13 06/21/91 182W13 06/24/91 k k k k k k 182W17 06/21/91 k k k k k k 182W21 06/21/91 k k k k k k AMOUNT 454.68 454.68 909.36 * 468.85 468.85 * 150.42 150.42 * 316.08 316.08 * 156.00 19.96 256.70 118.80 551.46 285.02 148.32 494;38 212.05 1,139.77 118.60 82.50 1,329.64 2,400.00 3,930.74 171.00 171.00 219.83 219.83 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION UNISTRUT NORTHERN POST MATERIAL UNISTRUT NORTHERN POST MATERIAL VAN PAPER CO VANTAGE ELECTRIC VESSCO VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING VOSS LIGHTING W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALDOR PUMP .& EQUIP WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WARNING LITES /MN WARNER IND SUPPLY SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 07 -01 -91 PAGE 37 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 325 -30 4441 10- 4542 - 325 -30 4418 * ** -CKS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 363306 5350 * ** -CKS 30 -4504- 782 -78 11646 5425 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 9704 5104 k * k -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 287732 4781 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 288120 4917 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 287826 3389 LAMPS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 289883 4844 * ** -CKS FIXTURES 10- 4540 - 440 -40 241166 4777 LAMP 10- 4540 - 646 -64 960652 4777 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 250796 5194 TOOLS 40- 4580- 801 -80 657784 4753 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 15083 5466 REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 15096 5467 REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 6961 5206 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 15180 5105 * ** -CKS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1337 4710 BUG SPRAYER 10- 4580 - 301 -30 5112 * ** -CKS * *k -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -01 -91 PAGE 38 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 182W28 06/24/91 143.00 WATER PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 232922 5215 143.00 * *R * * ** *Aft-CKS 182W41 06/25/91 440.03 WEST PHOTO PHOTOGRAPHIC 10- 4508 - 420 -42 29953 5306 440.03 * * * * * *R * ** -CKS 182W44 06/21/91 279.04 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. REPAIRS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 88672 4918 279.04 * * ** -CKS 182W66 06/21/91 52.36 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERALSUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 R * * * R R * * * -CKS 182W81 06/21/91 48.00 WM H MCCOY PROPANE 10- 4504 - 314 -30 48.00 * ** * ** * ** -CKS 182X05 06/24/91 1,947.86 XEROX CORP MAINT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 1,947.86 * * * * ** * ** -CKS' 182Z14 06/21/91 419.02 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5124 419.02 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 185852 06/25/91 43.00 CAROL SAMPSON CLASS CANCEL 23- 3500 - 000 -00 43.00 * * ** -CKS 345,039.65 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 11,334.55 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3,776.12 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 5,578.56 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 2,539.45 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 26,603.88 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 4,367.26 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 44.70 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 21,044.42 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 261,528.06 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 6,510.44 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 61,512.02 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 132.00 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 750,011.11 TOTAL (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SIDEWALKS VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN CITY CONTRACT 91 -12 (ENG) IMPROVEMENT NOS. S -40, S -50, S -51, S -52. S -53 & S -54 BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 1, 1991 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, August 1, 1991. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 5, 1991 to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 2,600 CY Common Excavation 460 CY Select Top Soil 33,360 SF 4" Concrete Sidewalk 575 LF B6 -18 Curb & Gutter 960 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel 2,940 SY Sod 2,200 SF Lannon Stone Retaining Wall Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications with -a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten. (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina'for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON JULY 10, JULY 17, AND JULY 24, 1991. PLEASE SEND US TWELVE (12) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA.