HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-03_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 3, 1992
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of Consent Agenda items is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
in its.normal sequence on the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL,OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of January 21, 1992
* II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS' -
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of January 21, 1992
II. REPORT ON EIS - I -494 Corridor from I -394 to Minnesota River
III. REPORT ON TRAFFIC STUDY - Tracy Avenue from West 66th St to West 70th St
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4 /5-favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Final Plat Approval - Peter Andrea 1st Addition - 6996 Valley View Rd
B. Set Hearing Dates (02/18/92)
* 1. Rezoning and Lot Division - Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd
Addition
* 2. Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition
* V. PUBLIC HEARING ON ALLEY VACATION - Alley between 5411 Zenith Av and 5408 York Av
(Contd from 12/16/91)
VI. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council requires to pass.
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass.
A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 142 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 142 to
Increase Amount of Continuing Bond
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Agenda
Edina City Council
February 3, 1992
Page 2
VIII.
AWARD OF BIDS
*
A. Fairway Aerator
*
B. 16 Foot Tractor Rotary Mower
*
C. Golf Course Sand Rake
*
D. Used Hydraulic Articulated Grader (Contd from 01/21/92)
*
K. Traffic Paint
*
F. Seger Jet (Continue to,02/18/92)
IX.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A._ -_Tax Forfeited Land - Hennepin County List 773 -NC (Contd from 1/21/92).
B. Appointments - Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees
*
C. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector
*
D. Change of Polling Location
X.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
XI.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XII.
MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XIII.
FINANCE
*
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/03/92: Total $695,166.21
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Wed Feb 5 MLC Legislative Dinner 6:30 P.M. Decathlon
Sun Feb 9 Edina Cultural Expo '92 4:00 P.M. Edina High School
Mon Feb 17 PRESIDENTS' DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues Feb 18 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Mar 2 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Mar 16 Regular Council Meeting
Wed Mar 18 .Annual Council /Boards /Commissions Dinner
7:00 P.M. Council Room
7:00 P.M. Council Room
7:00 P.M. Council Room
6:00 P.M. Braemar ClubhousL
Poor Quality Document
Disclaimer
The original or copy of a document or page of a document
presented at the time of digital scanning contained within this
digital file may be of substandard quality for viewing, printing or
faxing needs.
NINUTES
OF THE EDnU HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 21, 1992
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the HRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE METING OF JANUARY 6. 1992, APPROVED Notion was made by
Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve BRA
Minutes of January 6, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS DECK AND FOUNDATION WATERPROOFING
Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice
for award of bid for Centennial Lakes condominium deck and foundation
waterproofing to sole bidder, Kremer and Davis at $26,770.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION APPOINTMENT MADE TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Executive Director Hughes indicated that Ronald Ringling has served on the
Board of Directors of the East Edina Housing Foundation since its
establishment in 1985. Staff recommends his reappointment to a three year
term to 1995.
Notion was made by Commissioner Rice to reappoint Ronald Ringling to the Board
of Directors of the East Edina Housing Foundation for a three year term to
February 1, 1995. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 21, 1992, and
consisting of one page totalling $41,878.46.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
1992 CITY
OF EDINA HRA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92
PAGE 1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 9
MESSAGE
034700
01/29/92
14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SENIOR
BOND PAYMENT
01- 4302 - 133 -12
14,166.67 *
* * ** **
* ** -CKS
034800
01/29/92
9.00
ELLSWORTH CASPERSON
REFUND
01- 3140 - 131 -12
9.00 *
034801
01/29/92
1,628.00
WALKER PARKING
ENO FEES
01- 1319 - 131 -12 66719
10,792.70 *
034802
01/29/92
4,495.00
WENZEL MECHANICAL
HOT WATER SYSTEM
01- 1390 - 133 -12 51441 451
4,495.00 *
034803
01/29/92
68.67
CELLULAR ONE
TELEPHONE
01- 4000 - 134 -12
68.67 *
034804
01129/92
9,164.70
Value Recreation
Play ground Equip
01- 1340 - 134 -12
* ** -CKS
29,532.04
FUND 01 TOTAL
FUND HRA
29,532.04
TOTAL
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JANUARY 21, 1992
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CUB SCOUT MEN 4. BOY SCOUT TROOPS 62 AND 48 WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed
members of Cub Scout Den 4, Boy Scout Troop 62 from St. Stephen's Church and Boy
Scout Troop 48 from Calvary Lutheran Church who are working on merit badges.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded
by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 16, 1991, JANUARY 6. 1992 AND YEAR
END MEETING OF DECEMBER 30, 1991 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting
of December 16, 1991, and January 6, 1992, and the Year End Meeting of December
30,'1991.
Motion carried•on rollcall vote - five ayes.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 (TO INCREASE AMOUNT OF THE
CONTINUING BOND) Manager Rosland explained that staff would recommend increasing
the amount of the bond required under Ordinance No. 142 to bring the bonding
amount closer to the current job cost value and to cover liability if a claim is
made. Staff is in the process of licensing contractors for the 1992 business
year and it would be advantageous to have this change incorporated at this time
to coincide with the licensing process.
Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 142 -A2 for First Reading as follows:
. ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142
TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby
mended to read as follows:
"Sec. 3. Bonds. Unless exempt by state law, every applicant for (i) a license
registration for the carrying on within the City of the business of plumbing,
water softener installing, well drilling,or building moving, or (ii) a license
pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 429, Part l (Oil Burner Installer), 429, Part 2
(Stoker Installer), 429, Part 3 (Steam and Hot Water Heating Installer), 429,
Part 4 (Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning Installer), 429,'Part 5
(Refrigeration Installer), 431, Part 4 (Gas Fitter) and 1302 (Scavenger) shall
file with such application a bond that is valid and in force and effect in the
penal sum of at least $5,000.00, with a corporate surety approved by the City
Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all material
and equipment furnished, and as to all business carried on or all work done,
commenced or performed during the term of the license, license registration or
renewal thereof shall:"
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
passage and publication.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE 2 1/2 YARD, FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATED LOADER Notion was
made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one
2 1/2 yard, four -wheel drive articulated loader to sole bidder, Ziegler, Inc., at
$96,944.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.'
*AWARD OF BID CONTINUED TO 02/03/92 FOR USED HYDRAULIC ARTICULATED GRADER Notion
was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue'award of bid
for a used hydraulic articulated grader to February 3, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR DRIVING RANGE TRACTOR Notion was made by.Nember Kelly and was
seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a driving range tractor to
recommended low bidder, Northstar Turf, at $5,105.00 with trade.
Motion carried on rollcall.vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC CENTER CONCESSION STAND EQUIPMENT Notion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the Aquatic
Center concession stand replacement equipment to recommended low bidder, Stan
Morgan and Associates, at $6,723.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote.- five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR REEL NOWER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice for award of bid for a reel mower to recommended low bidder, Cushman
Motors, at $6,500.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FILING SYSTEM/BUILDING DEPARTMENT Notion was made by Member
Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a filing system for
the Building Department to Wright Line at $5,545.12 through state contract.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR VARIOUS TRAFFIC SIGN SUPPLIES Notion was made by Member Kelly
and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for various traffic sign
supplies to Lyle Signs at $6,692.74 per Hennepin County Contract #2052A1 -232.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FIVE 1992 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLES AND ONE 1992 MID-
SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice for award of bid for five 1992 full -size pursuit vehicles and one
1992 mid -size pursuit vehicle to Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $76,847.00
through State and Hennepin County Purchasing Cooperatives.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1992 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLE Notion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by.Member Rice for award of bid for one 1992 full -
size police pursuit vehicle to Superior Ford at $12,822.00 through State
Purchasing Cooperative.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes..
HENNEPIN COUNTY LIST 773 -NC TAX FORFEITED LAND RECOMMENDATIONS CONSIDERED
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING OUTLOT B. DEARBORN ADDITION FOR PRIVATE AUCTION:
ACTION ON ROBERT HANSEN PROPERTY CONTINUED TO 02/03/92 Planner Larsen presented
Hennepin County List 773 -NC of tax forfeited land located in the City. He
Y
explained that property taxes have not been paid for a period of seven years on
the two parcels listed. The County has requested Council resolutions approving
the parcels for public auction to be included in a Spring 1992 public auction.
The owners have the ability to pay the back taxes and any special assessments due
on the property to reclaim the parcels at any time prior to auction.
Parcel A (06- 116 -21 -21 -0005) - A vacant parcel of about three acres, owned by
Robert Hansen and generally located north of.Highway No. 62 and west of Gleason
Court. A number of development proposals have been given preliminary approval by
the Council but none have been given final approval. Staff believes this parcel
should and will ultimately be developed privately, sees no benefit in public
ownership and would recommend that the Council approve public auction of the
property.
Member Rice commented that there are substantial unpaid special assessments on
the parcel and asked if the City would recover those. He also asked what the
land is currently zoned. Planner Larsen explained that if the parcel is sold at
public auction the City would be paid first. If the sale price is less that the
special assessments the City would get all of that. If the amount collected is
more than the special assessments the City would be paid what it is owed. The
property is still zoned R -1 as no final approval has been given for development.
Mayor Richards asked if the City could acquire the land at no cost, hold it until
the market improves and then sell it to recoup the unpaid special assessments.
Attorney Gilligan opined that under state statute if the City were to acquire the
property is must be for public purposes only. The City cannot be in the business
of banking land for future development.
Mayor Richards then asked if the City could request Hennepin County to withhold
the parcel from public auction for a period of time. Planner Larsen recalled
that about a year ago the City had asked that a certain parcel be withheld from
auction for one year and the County had agreed to that. Mayor Richards observed
that some years ago the residents in that neighborhood had participated in the
purchase of the Krahl Hill as open space. He commented that they may have some
interest in participating in the purchase of the subject property.
Member Rice made a motion to continue action on Parcel A to the Council meeting
of February 3, 1992, and to instruct staff to communicate with residents in the
area to see if they are interested in participating in the purchase of the
property as additional open space. Member Paulus seconded the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Parcel B (30- 117 -21 -21 -0162) - A 10 foot by 125 foot strip of land between a City
owned pon ding area and a developed single family property directly to the south.
The strip was platted as an outlot of the Dearborn Addition in 1984. The
adjacent homeowner has been maintaining this as part of his lawn. It appears
that the strip was platted as an outlot in order to easily convey the property to
this homeowner. However, the conveyance did not occur and the Dearborn Addition
developers have allowed it to go tax forfeit. Since the land has no public
benefit, cannot be independently developed and directly relates to an adjacent
property, staff would recommend private auction to the adjacent land owner.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the
State of Minnesota for,non- payment of property taxes, which said list was
received on December 13, 1991, Non '-Conservation List 773 -NC; and
AREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PINS No. 30- 117 -21 -21 -0162 has
heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore
been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;
WHEREAS, it has.been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no
existing or pending special assessments on said parcel;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said
classification is hereby approved;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcel of land is not
buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance and that sale of said parcel
be limited to the adjacent property owner (6600 Belmore Lane) for attachment
thereto.
ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1992.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY CO16MIZ°1'EE Notion was made
by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Betsy Larson to.the
Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term from 2/1/92 to
2/1/94, to fill an existing vacancy. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CORRESPONDENCE ACKNOWLEDGED FROM MASSAGE LICENSEE Mayor Richards referred to
correspondence from Ronald David Edblom, 610 84th Lane Northwest, Coon Rapids, MN
55433 (holder of a massage license), asking to be placed on an upcoming Council
agenda to seek a waiver on the ordinance requirements for a massage business
license. Member Smith emphasized that the Council generally does not waive
ordinance requirements. Mayor Richards asked staff to convey that message and to
inform Mr. Edblom to go through the normal process for a license.
SUMMARY OF DRAFT EIS PRESENTED FOR I -494 FROM I -394 TO THE MINNESOTA RIVER
Engineer Hoffman explained that Edina has been participating in the I -494 EIS
process for some time and the EIS process is reaching the public hearing
timeframe. The official public hearing involving the whole corridor will be held
in April or May, 1992. He presented a summary of the document for review prior
to a presentation by MNDOT and a BRW consultant at the February 3,.1992, Council
meeting when they would explain how this would affect Edina properties along
I -494.
Engineer Hoffman pointed out the following: 1) Construction of the project would
take approximately ten years while construction work within each segment could
take from one to three years. 2) The cost estimates for the build alternatives
range from $541.5 to $612.0 million for Build Alternative 1 and from $582.5 to
$650.1 million for Build Alternative 2. 3) The estimated right of way costs
would be between $140 and $165 million. 4) Right of way implications that would
affect Edina would be at the interchanges of I- 494 /Highway 100 and Highway
196/I -494.
Member Paulus asked that Larry Laukka be in attendance at the February 3, 1992,
Council Meeting as he has represented Edina businesses in the I -494 Corridor in
the past and is an Edina resident.
Member Smith inquired whether the philosophy of the project was simply to widen
and lay down more pavement or was a creative solution being sought to deflect
more traffic. Engineer Hoffman said high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and light rail
studies have been made. Light rail has been discarded while the study showed
that a HOV land should be included in the I -494 system. If some of the
suggestions are not implemented there will be more local traffic problems in
Edina, e.g. Tracy Avenue and Parkwood Knolls. Member Smith asked why the study
did not include building another highway five miles south. Engineer Hoffman said
the destination of the traffic using I -494 is within the five city I -494 corridor
area.
Member Rice suggested that William Crawford, MNDOT Metro District Engineer, be
asked to attend the February 3, 1992 Council Meeting also.
DRAFT ORDINANCE ON SATELLITE DISHES/ANTENNAS DISCUSSED: PERMIT AUTHORIZED FOR
REPIACEMENT ANTENNA AT 7600 METRO BOULEVARD Mayor Richards mentioned that at the
codification work session on January 18, 1992, the Council had reviewed the draft .
ordinance on satellite dishes, antennas and towers and had asked for additional
information relating to those types of installations. Coincidentally, a call was
received from General Motors, 7600 Metro Boulevard, who felt adversely impacted
by the current moratorium on issuance of permits for dishes, antennas and towers.
Planner Larsen submitted the following information: 1) The typical south and
southwest suburbs by ordinance limit the maximum height of towers and antennas to
60 -65 feet which coincides with Edina's proposed ordinance. 2) Mesh vs. solid
dishes - For residential installations mesh is cheaper to manufacture, ship and
install, has less wind resistance and requires less support than a solid dish.
The difference between the two types is that they operate on different bands -
"C" band and "KU" band. The "KU" band requires a solid dish because of wave
length. The smaller dishes that send /receive and replace a phone line are the
new technology (two foot by four foot) for home installations. 3) Antennas
installed in residential settings are usually round dishes of 8, 10 or 12 feet
diameter. Most 8 foot dishes do not provide satisfactory reception while 10 foot
dishes do, so that most business is for the 10 foot dish. Based on that, the
proposed draft ordinance has a combination for the 12 foot ground mounted dish
(15 feet total height from the ground) so it could be elevated and angled to
receive the satellite signal. The alternative would be to allow only a maximum
10 foot diameter dish. Installations range in price from $2,400 to $4,000 for a
single family home. Slides.were then shown illustrating various satellite dishes
and antennas that were installed in the City prior to the moratorium instituted
on March 4, 1991. It was noted that staff had attempted to reach the persons who
had wanted to appear before Council to give a presentation on cellular phones and
satellite dishes. Staff would recommend that the Council hold a public hearing
on the draft ordinance relating to dishes, antennas and towers on February 18,
1992, so that the Council could take an action before the moratorium expires.
Member Smith asked what the process would be in the case of a request to place an
antenna on top of a building that had already been granted a variance on height.
Planner Larsen said that the draft antenna ordinance is set up the same as the
zoning and sign ordinances. When someone requests a variance to locate an
antenna the matter would be heard by the Board of Appeals. If the Board's
decision were then appealed it would come before the Council. Member Smith said
his concern was granting a variance for an antenna when a variance had already
been given for the building height.
Shirley Wilson, stated she was Operations Manager for Electronic Data Systems and
was representing General Motors Service Parts located at 7600 Metro Boulevard.
Currently there is a solid 1.8 meter satellite dish mounted on the roof which can
only be used to receive data. General Motors is going through financial
difficulties and it is costing them a great deal of money to continue on -the
- public -dedicated circuit as opposed to going to a satellite dish that could both
receive and transmit data. Their request is to replace the existing dish and
relocate it approximately 70 feet closer to the perimeter of the building. There
would be no physical difference in dish size but the new dish would enable them
to receive and transmit. The relocation would allow repair of the roof which is
badly needed.
Planner Larsen clarified that what they are proposing to install would comply
with all ordinance restrictions and would have the least visible impact on the
area.
Member Smith moved adoption of the following Preamble and adoption of Ordinance
No. 114 -A2 as follows with waiver of Second Reading:
PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on March 4, 1991, did
direct the City staff to conduct studies of the applicable plans and ordinances
of the City, and to give information to, and to make recommendations to, the City
Council relative to the need and desirability, if any, for adopting nev or
amending existing plans and ordinances of the City relating to restricting,
regulating or controlling the erection, location, size and use of towers,
antennas and dish antennas within the City; and
WHEREAS, to allow such studies to go on and to protect the planning process and
the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City, the City Council
found it necessary and desirable to adopt, and did adopt, on March 4, 1991,
Ordinance Po. 114 imposing a moratorium. on the issuance of any permits for the
construction, erection and relocation in the City of any tower, antenna or dish
antenna, as defined in Ordinance Po. 812 of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a request from General Motors located at
7600 Metro Boulevard in the City that it be allowed to replace the existing dish
antenna on the roof of such building with a similarly sized dish antenna on a
different location on the roof of;such building in order to accommodate necessary
repairs to the roof and to upgrade the antenna to permit transmission of signals;
and
WHEREAS, it was the intent and purpose of the City Council in directing such
studies by City staff and adopting Ordinance No. 114 to prevent uncontrolled
proliferation of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas, especially in or near
residential areas, so as to protect the health, safety or welfare of the citizens
of the City, but the City Council recognizes that General Motors will suffer an
undue hardship due to circumstances unique to the building located at 7600 Metro
Boulevard if the moratorium is imposed on the replacement of the dish antenna on
such building, and that allowing such replacement will not adversely affect the
intent and purpose of the City Council in directing such studies and adopting.
Ordinance No. 114 if such antenna is of similar size as the existing antenna.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby adopt the following ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 114 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 114
TO ALLOW ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR CERTAIN ANTENNAS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Permits Allowed. Notwithstanding the moratorium imposed by
Ordinance No. 114, and the provisions of that ordinance, a permit may be applied.
for, and issued, pursuant to the applicable ordinances of the City, for a dish
antenna to be situated.on the roof located at 7600 Metro Boulevard, in the'City,
provided such dish antenna does not exceed six (6) feet in diameter, does not
exceed a height of eight (8) feet (when measured from the roof to the highest
point of the antenna).
Sec. 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its adoption and publication.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
PAY EOUITY REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED TO STATE Manager Rosland explained that the
City is required to submit a pay equity report on January 31, 1992 to the
Department of Employee Relations providing information concerning salaries and
wages of City employees. Staff has been directed to complete the forms and to
provide the information requested. Manager Rosland asked the Council to
authorize Mayor Richards to sign the completed report prior to submission to the
State.
Member Paulus made a motion authorizing Mayor Richards to sign the pay equity
report for submission to the Department of Employee Relations. Motion was
seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED FOR ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND Member Kelly
introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves
the assignment by its depository, First Bank National Association, of the
following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina
Public Funds deposited in said depository:
Description Rate Due Par Value
U S Treasury 7 7/8 Note M 92 7.875 7/31/92 $ 300,000.00
U S Treasury 7 1/3 Note G 93 7.250 7/15/93 $3.460.000.00
$3,760,000.00
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND - MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves
the assignment by its depository, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, of the following
securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds
deposited in said depository:
Description Rate Due Par Value
Federal Home Loan Mtg. Corp 5.88 11/15/19 $ 625,000.00
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolutions adopted.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice
to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Register dated January 21, 1992 and consisting of 41 pages: General Fund
$1,861,871.16; Communications $8,744.16; Art Center $2,113.76; Capital Fund
$225.00; Swimming Pool Fund $703.93; Golf Course Fund $22,437.97; Recreation
Center Fund $15,506.78; Gun Range Fund $929.38; Edinborough Park $43,162.29;
Utility Fund $153,039.80; Storm Sewer Utility $246,285.77; Liquor Dispensary
$76,378.12; Construction Fund $49,202.63; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $279,455.00;
TOTAL $2,760,055.75; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims
shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 31, 1991 and consisting
17 pages: General Fund $148.334.44; Liquor Dispensary Fund $342,401.72; TOTAL
$490,736.16.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
Fund
as
of
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M.
City Clerk
a w91NA1r�
o e,
• 'N�bRPOM��� •
iae6
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
I I
From: Francis Hoffman ,; =;,L
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date: February 3, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
'Subject: I -494 EIS Report
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare a Council position for
the EIS public hearing in April 1992
Info /Background The following individuals will be in attendance to
present the EIS findings and comments as it pertains to Edina:
Bill Crawford - Metro Engineer from Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT)
Craig Robinson - Project Manager for the-I -494 EIS from MNDOT
Tony Hepplemann - Consulting Engineer from BRW Consulting Firm doing
I -494 EIS work
Larry Laukka - Improve 494 (Private Sector Participant)
Attached are three figures which graphically portray the freeway interchange
alternatives being reviewed in the EIS.
The primary issues for Edina.will be loss of access at the I -494 and 169 interchange
(Old County Road 18) and its relationship to the East Bush Lake /I -494 interchange
alternatives. The second main issue is the impact at Highway 100 and I -494 inter-
change on surrounding properties.
The attached graphics are difficult to read even in a larger scale, but the
major change is to construct a full access interchange at East Bush Lake
(eastbound & westbound) to provide access to our Edina Interchange Center.
Current access causes traffic overloads at W. 77th and Highway 100.
KI
11 Lul
7�
u
z
i
Cd 1
1 �
i r
1 r
� 1
1,
N �
IN I ,�•�
BY 1
OTHER' a
i _
r wN
I
BY OTHERS ---------------
oJ
OPTION 113
;
FULLY
DIRECTIONAL f
J
I warlmn
NQ
•i / � may^ � � - / r i- f � .. ' `�Z j 7 � 7 �
* NOTE:
RAMPS TO AND FROM THE SOUTH ON CSAH 18
AT HIGHWOOD AVE. ARE OPTIONAL UNDER
EITHER INTERCHANGE SUBALTERNATIVE.
r/ e
Jil
11II IIIII�r II��I
m
�� ; • ' FI I SH
CS7 i 1
C' r,
-t
♦' ,
-11max— —
DRAFT Figure 3.9 -3a.
llm494 ►�
ENVIRONMENTAL T.H.51212- T.H.1691C.S.A.H.18 INTERCHANGE AREA TA7 m o Z ; K
IMPACT SUBALTERNATIVES 1 A AND 1 B TA62 i =r E
IIRECONSTRUCTION • SPLIT DIAMOND- BETWEEN PRAIRIE CENTER DR. & WASHINGTCN -AVE -- — —
MINNESOTA RIVER TO I -394 STATEMENT FULL ACCESS AT E BUSH LAKE RD. 0 200 w � ® TK169
1
If
ff
W'
Z
3
O
0
.N �8N\A
4�
�j
--�,W t:3�
W
Q
W
Ur
Z =
SCHEMATIC
v,
If
Figure 3.10
' -384 Ui
DRAFT
lm494
T.H.100 /NORMANDALE BLVD. (C.:�.A.H.34) INTERCHANGE AREA
U K
ENVIRONMENTAL
T.K� m o
SUBALTERNATIVE 1 OPTION
• SEMI - DIRECTIONAL WITH LOOPS T.H.100
a i E
RECONSTRUCTION
IMPACT
AT
• SINGLE POINT DIAMOND AT E BUSH LAKE RD.
MINIMUM AT 77TH
g2r
r.Kes
r.K °18B �4es
MINNESOTA RIVER TO1-394
STATEMENT
RUC FRANCE 484THST/NORMANDALEAT-GRADE a =o, ,� any t R
• RECONSTRUCT FRANCE AVE.
.
If
j� 1
1
I
1 L
1
E
z
O
O
a ,V�
J
1
__uVEBEF
;SfL A
E. BUSH LAKE RD. OPTION
11
- m -- -
RECONSTRUCTION
MINNESOTA RIVER TO 1-394
1 J _
a
� a
. a
E,
/
1 }f�
n +o r
t
S
A bd J
1
V R
j
V,
I 1 1
1. • 1 1
1. 1 1 Y,
i�
1 a
E_ QPTION FOR (' 1
77TH ST. t
W. 77TH S"
= w
r= y >
W. 77TH ST. OPTION
1_;
v
1 P
�_
rn,
n-' ;'--
�
OrQ ,
w
1 -384
w
Zm
�\
cc
L=1
-
T.li7
W
T.H62
DRAFT- Figure 3.11
ENVIRONMENTAL T-.H.1-00 /NORMANDALE BLVD. (C.S.A:H.34) INTERCHANGE AREA -
IMPACT SUBALTERNATIVE 2 OPTION
• PARTIAL DIRECTIONAL WITH LOOPS AT T.H.100
• DIAMOND WITH LOOP OR FOLDED DIAMOND AT E. BUSH'LAKE RD.
STATEMENT • FOLDED DIAMOND OR DIAMOND WITH LOOP AT W. 77TH ST. 0 4 0o soo Q OFN
• RECONSTRUCT FRANCE AVE. • 84TH ST. /NORMANDALI= BLVD. AT— GRADE
0
1 -384
�\
T.li7
W
T.H62
R
TA
L Ii166
1 -464
o1
Jch
0
�V)/
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL-
From:
From:
N�
HOFFMA . ! ;>
DIRECTOR OF PUB
❑
WORKS
Date:
FEBRUARY 3, 1992
S_ ubject:
0
TRACY AVENUE
Action
WEST 66th to WEST
Motion
70th STREET
❑
TRAFFIC REPORT
REVIEW
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III:
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Review report with consultant and evaluate the public
hearing testimony to determine if any traffic diversion
should be considered at the time.
Info /Background:
The Edina City Council reviewed a Traffic Report on Tracy
Avenue from West 66th Street to West 70th Street at its
December 16th, 1991, meeting. Council directed staff to
send out notices for a public hearing on the issue.
Approximately 400 homeowner's received a packet containing
a notice of public hearing and a abbreviated version of
the report. Attached to this memorandum is the mailed
notice and the response from the neighborhood.
Dennis Eyler of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch will make a presenta-
tion at the City Council meeting on his report. Staff
will make a short presentation indicating what has occurred
up to the time the traffic report request was requested.
0
rim
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
The Edina City Council will meet on February 3rd, 1992 at 7 :00 PM in the
City Council Chambers to review'a traffic report prepared at Council request
regarding traffic in your general area. The specific review - involved rush
hour traffic diverting from the City collector streets onto Tracy Avenue
from West 66th to West 70th Street.
The following materials are enclosed for your review:
(A) Traffic Flow Map using 1989 average daily traffic flow on collector
streets in-your general area. (Dashed lines indicate collector
street.)
(B) Four page SUMMARY on the report prepared by Dennis Eyler, Transporta-
tion Engineer from the consulting firm of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc.
(Copies of the complete consultant report are available at City Hall.)
(C) Existing Condition Map for your general neighborhood. (Please note
that traffic volumes underlined on this map are real average daily
traffic counts and the remainder are computer generated from a computer
model that is used in developing traffic flow projections.)
(D) Figure 9 Traffic Diverters - Pattern D which is the consultant's
recommended pattern if the City wishes to divert traffic from the
neighborhood.
The consultant will make a detailed presentation at the February 3rd Council
meeting.
As you will note when you read the attached material, the primary issue is
whether any alteration to our street system is warranted to attempt change
in traffic flow patterns.
The Edina City Council, Edina Traffic Safety Committee and City staff have
not taken a position on this report. The purpose of the Council meeting is
to involve the neighborhood in the decision making process prior to any
final decision on this issue.
Comments on this report should be directed to the Edina City Council at 4801
West 50th:Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424.
Sincerely,
O
Francis J. oE.
Director of Public Works
and Chairman of the Edina
Traffic Safety Committee
FJH/c1 -f -- �- - --
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394
TDD (6121 927 -5.161
^
1989 CITY TRAFFIC FLOW COUNTS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC lip!
SOUT. on
To
memo
MIRR
LORD 2RQv&_,
All
Lft
LA
Is
ARCTIC
Am I
1000 7s
77.
CIO LA
LA
iq
LO'S LA
TR
OUR
P4.ull 's
C.
"of st
BRAEM PAM
SRFSTRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ PARKING ■ LAND SURVEYORS
SRF No. 0911592
December 6, 1991
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
City Engineer
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 ,
RE: TRAFFIC STUDY
TRACY AVENUE - WEST 66TH STREET TO WEST 70TH STREET
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
As you requested, we have completed a traffic study and analysis
of the Tracy Avenue neighborhood, generally' between West 66th
Street and West 70th Street. Based on this traffic study and
analysis we offer the following comments and recommendations for
your consideration:
INTRODUCTION
This study was completed in response to neighborhood concerns for
the amount of "through" traffic cutting through the neighborhood
on Tracy Avenue between West 66th and West 70th Streets in the
City of Edina.
The study area.is generally the neighborhood bounded on the north
and east by Nine Mile Creek, on the south by West.70th Street,
and on the west by Valley View Road and Antrim Road (see
Figure 1).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
City staff has previously documented that there is a significant
amount of "through" traffic using Tracy Avenue as a short cut
through the subject neighborhood. The staff's conclusion that
this "through" traffic is primarily travelling between the
Crosstown Highway interchange with Tracy Avenue and the Edina
Industrial Park, is reasonable.
This "through" traffic is cutting through the neighborhood
primarily due to the congestion and delay that exists on the
Crosstown -- Highway and -- Highway - 100-.- --- - - --
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkwav North. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55447
612/475 -0010 FAX 612/475 -2429
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 2 - December 6, 1991
Based on a cordon count of the neighborhood which was completed
by the city 'in early October 1991, there are 5,770 vehicles
entering or exiting the neighborhood daily (the counts were
adjusted for daily, and seasonal variations). The estimated 320
homes within the neighborhood would only generate about 3,200
daily vehicle trips, based on the I.T.E. average daily trip rate
of 10 trips per household. The difference of 2,570 trips per day
is a significant amount of "through" traffic cutting through the
subject neighborhood.
This "through" traffic is primarily cutting through the
neighborhood on Tracy Avenue. However there is "through" traffic
on other neighborhood streets such as Limerick and Hillside Lane
and Galway and Brook Drive, as well (see'Figure 2).
STUDY ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY
It was. assumed that there are no improvements which could be
easily implemented within the near future that would improve the
operation of the. Crosstown Highway or Highway 100 which would
also help reduce the neighborhood "through" traffic.
It was therefore also assumed that the "through" traffic would
need to be diverted from the neighborhood streets to, the
collector streets serving the study area. These collector
streets were assumed to be Valley View Road, Antrim Road and West
70th Street. It was also assumed, that a significant increase in
traffic volumes on these collector streets was acceptable.to the
city and it's residents.
A computer model of the study area/ neighborhood roadway system
was developed using the CARS (Comprehensive Assignment and
Routing System) micro - computer program. This computer model was
used to test the identified alternative actions or neighborhood
traffic management strategies.
IDENTIFIED ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
The identified alternative actions which were tested are listed
as follows:
o An alternating pattern of stop signs on streets with- a
significant amount of "through" traffic (see Figure 3). Poor
stop sign compliance should be expected.
o A series of multi -way stops along Tracy Avenue from West 66th
Street to West 70th Street (see Figure 4). Poor stop sign
compliance should be expected.-
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 3 - December 6, 1991
o Improving the collector streets by changing the geometrics at
the intersections of Valley View Road at Antrim Road and
Antrim Road at West 70th Street (see Figure 5).
o Installing various patterns of_ traffic diverters within the
neighborhood (see Figures 6 through 9).
o Closing Tracy Avenue between West 66th Street and, Hillside
Circle, and between Brook Drive and Mc Guire Road, and closing
the intersection of Brook Drive and Hillside Lane (see
Figure 10) .
Two - identified alternative actions were not tested because they
involved regulatory traffic restrictions that require a
prohibitively high level of police enforcement to obtain
acceptable levels of compliance. These alternative .actions are
listed as follows:
o Turn prohibitions by time of day at the intersections of the
high "through" traffic neighborhood streets and the study area
collector streets.
o Short one -way street segments on the high "through" traffic
neighborhood streets.
ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION AND FINDINGS
Two of the identified alternative actions tested would be
effective in diverting the "through" traffic from the
neighborhood streets" to the collector streets. Both of these
actions involve installation of traffic diverters within the
neighborhood (Traffic Diverter Pattern B - Figure 7, and Pattern
D - Figure 9). Significant changes in the travel patterns of the
neighborhood residents will result as well.
Both of these traffic diverter patterns virtually cut the
neighborhood in two. Pattern B cuts the neighborhood in half at
West 68th Street and allows no movement between the north and
south halves. Pattern D cuts the neighborhood" in half diagonally
form northeast to southwest and allows no movement between the
southeast and northwest halves.
Current neighborhood street-planning principals would not provide
the "through" streets that exist in the subject neighborhood.
The installation of traffic diverters would retrofit the
neighborhood to be consistent with current neighborhood street
planning principals.
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 4 - December 6, 1991
The cost to construct permanent traffic diverters at the required
intersections is roughly estimated at $10,000 per intersection,
or $40,000 for Pattern .B and $30,000 for Pattern D.
The other identified alternative actions tested did not result in
effectively diverting the "through" traffic" to the collector
streets. They either did nothing 'to change the existing pattern
or only shifted the "through" traffic to another neighborhood
street.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Should the City wish to implement a neighborhood traffic
improvement project for the study area it is recommended that
Traffic Diverter Pattern D (see Figure 9) be selected.
Due to the significant change in the neighborhood residents
travel patterns and the costs for the permanent traffic diverters
it is recommended that the plan be implemented on a
temporary /trail basis and then be monitored. The traffic
diverters could be temporarily constructed using' Type III
barricades. It would be helpful to also install advance signing
on, the collector. street approaches to the neighborhood advising
the "through" motorists of the change in the street network.
Experience shows that once the traffic diverters have been
installed, and the "through" traffic problem is no longer present
or visible to the neighborhood, all that remains are the traffic
diverters which continue to be an inconvenience to the
neighborhood. After time the neighborhood often requests to have
the diverters removed.
It is possible that the temporary traffic diverters left in place
long enough could break the "through" traffic pattern. The
temporary diverters could then be easily removed, returning the
neighborhood street system to it's original condition.
Another consideration is emergency response time will- be
increased- for emergency vehicles responding to a call fore
assistance within the neighborhood.
zt�
CO y,, a I
yi = pRG`f
9� c OR.
-� RD.
WAY
>
�iy J W kw
- WHIT 371 i
W I AI
� GI
�u DoR
tXl�ilJ4 �,10P 51l�U. 0�9 a
w 64TH '
• x15 ?11J1s Yt '�iLsll. 9 0
o -- D�1[:Y�TFfi�- V6LL�GiI✓. cr.
-=-= s�C611Di�Y "TIaP.�CY�•l+ P1)()TFi. �J c �o `t.
L S p
Ito a -
C—. 1125
66TH 1 ST LOW i
,GRACE J w, 6 au
VI J� T 1 trj �% I
°� a 57�
A LA. J
S-
A
Z76 2b
1
6
abe JP`'�'�
SUSAN AV
ac
1540 x
Z30 19C j 70 v
% w. 68TH i x J I ST.
'
CHAPEL Qq. 3 166
Lo00 1 140 a
_. , 144 `' 440 Z56 `io
BROOK np 510 O c
NE ° w
z w 69TH ST. Zon s Oft. 'P
polo � ; 44� -
ERIN 1 1 1= wtCGU(RE R0. (o ?b , CREEK-
4 a 3 110 17-30 70 VIEW LA.
ckcio
WEST 70th
'rEq o i Uc� O VILL i1;GE _
Ry Z Z J �4CLE l OR.. o>
Z �
4h
gbft- t,a•1oe U4X uo_Wft-, KOM ALL a?NtXb stal 03N1"kZ !" V ..
- - srRCAR- RCSCOE- FAUSCH, INC - CITY OF EDINA FIGURE
�XISTIIJG C�lJdl1 lL�l1S
2
sRF NO. 09zM2 - TRACY AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY
� WI
OHO �t^yJ` a I I
WAY
)�S J W
WI A
- YI►H I T �! I I'
m all
l.Ci�Yilit% OOR C Z I
� • � t �,Xl'�I11J4 �1�P ��i.�U 0, � w 64TH
90
a �
' �XlSTIuLt `{tC,1.� SILsLJ .
MoveL i LC11ST V ALLE-i LA.
Cc
Q ° LOCA'Tw Cp Imm\jemal . ~ , • �„ �" �p
— = 5EC0►,1G�`{ �.?l�P�(Y�U" �dU ?�. (,100 H� s '�
F \
�E RD _ 1�0�0 0 1Z0 c
Y
.►P� /�' -716 w 66TH ?j0 11
� j SZOb
I � 3 ,G R CEO Zoo / I 220 J w �I
TER. ' a 3 YTH 1
LOI S LA. Z50 Z
E,{ I(o0 ' I ZD 9�
V Y
SI10 `IPA SUSAN AV u
ZSO 2(00 a �_
68TH ST. J
CHAPEL 04.
> 436 146, 190
I 196 c
BROOK 53O O �I s
A N E 2 I (.O J �ii�P �
� w 69TH ST. 330 ac 8 OA•
c (030 j
ERIN 480 MCGUIRE R0. 430 Z v CREEK
4510 SIO u 6w SD W VIEW LA.
W T i
70th
� - - r �•' cc^^ r77S0
VILLAGE Z
'QY Z a 4LlE't OR.
STRQU- ROSCOE- FAUS0i, NC CITY OF EDINA � h FIGURL
SRF CONSULTING °N�
Twic s - �,�t�u n 9
SRF NO. 0911592 TRACY AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY
January 28, 1992
To: EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Gordon Hughes
Craig Swanson
Bob Sherman
Alison Fuhr
cc: Fred Richards
Ken Rosland
Peggy Kelly
Jane Paulus
Jack Rice
Glenn Smith
Re: Q&OF THE TRACY AVENUE STUDY/RECOMMENDATION
We wish to submit the following petiton for your consideration.
Thank you,
Residents in the area of the Tracy Avenue SRF Traffic Study
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE 'TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed. to any changes that- would divert traffic from the current and long .
established patterns-and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street ; or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
i
f
Address
1�o
�'w
��� 7 #dtj,��
617 4;t
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and- are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
�ao
00
0� �ckrk-5�
Address,, i'
I I , i,
W
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
i
i
i
/�z
r �
Address
6713 41446ww9ylk 4
J( fl
ra:��
-'.�� UN
odor
TOM
•
441-1-LY/`bizc; /'611, 1- 1
7
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally - residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Address
G 7a y L ,.��/ cI <<z
F' d 7 i vn e r I c K &4'E-4—
LT11Si
—T 7/
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View,. Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
�� k-C" Anq-�
Address
I\
G� �70, T Nil L4 ; ��. luuu) -,
020 Ifs LLSr0L- Gw.
66/7 M afii.
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
,) c,
�
Axzt� 44:��
Address
/1A so
• t.
7 L
5Xd (o
I ( i,
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, .Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
MCI
Address
t
�t 1
t
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Nam
r+ 1
Address
�oct m4c Ale-
F-I . 6
i
r-
i
Address
�oct m4c Ale-
F-I . 6
i
r-
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE .TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
Lai
Hrw )�
Address
6 6
ssn�
lie G6'�
rya
s71 2 al, ?d -1W
�-71Zw-
�,7 0/
or
s9oa 70 �'
. s-50sx tj � 6 "'.
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic .
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes. that would divert traffic from.the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must 'not result in any further diversion of traffic into_ a
totally-residential area. Instead,_ a proposal that -deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley -View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th:
Street , or seeks a solution closer, to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
Address
s (A) 7 si
AU
_ �g 1
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion -
within our neighborhood. must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
r
.n
J
I
Address
'56'�q' N ct
l�
r � �
--' 0° W. 6 L K o-
S3nv w b&' S � .
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of .the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , We contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within-our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th -
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
r,
Address
PER���
i
5568 CJ,
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners. living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
Address
S-4 13' 9,Z a /< 'P"
521 :7 Nce, GU ► ►�e.
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. .
Name Address
• ,�.
F.
S I Zq Sms Ari kvs
5-733 Skxs� A-�,)
� X33 SHS9 � !-} ✓�.
January 26, 1992
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Messrs: Fred Richards, Mayor
Jack Rice
Glenn Smith
Ms: Peggy Kelly
Jane Paulus
cc:
Gordon Hughes
Craig Swanson
Bob Sherman
Alison Fuhr
Ken Rosland
Subject: Tracy Avenue Traffic Study
We have been Edina residents since 1955, and have been at our present
address on Galway Drive for thirty -two years. Before selecting the lot on
which to build, we consulted several times with Mr. George Hite, who was
then with Edina City Planning. Mr. Hite assured us that this would remain a
strictly quiet residential area. As you are probably aware, this area is known as
"The Heights" and it has many hilly approaches and winding streets which
we like, but certainly could pose problems for additional volume of heavy
through traffic. In particular, Galway Drive begins at 66th Street with a hilly
incline, is curved and only two and a half blocks long.
The Tracy Avenue Traffic Study considers proposed change not to a new
development, but in an established thirty -five year old residential
neighborhood. Our decision to build and live on Galway Drive was made
only after reviewing several points including traffic, neighborhood
development plans, zoning, etc. prior to buying. We don't see why we
should now be penalized by disrupting a long established neighborhood
setting with long established collector streets and thoroughfares. We have
also conducted an independent study that shows the housing density per one-
tenth mile along Tracy Avenue between Valley View and 70th Street is much
less than on other streets involved in this study. In effect, if any changes are
made, many residents in our community will be inconvenienced out of
consideration for a few who most likely did not research their home purchase
in advance.
At a January 23rd meeting of concerned neighbors (eighty present), the
overwhelming consensus was to leave the existing traffic patterns and
conditions in our neighborhood as they currently are. Any changes would
result in inconvenience or increased traffic on our very quiet street and will
ultimately reduce property values. We also find that the computer
projections from the SRF study of existing traffic on Galway Drive at 630 cars
per day to be grossly overstated and unrealistically high.
One final point, Tracy Avenue is a designated cloverleaf intersection with the
Highway 62 Crosstown. This in itself indicates that Tracy Avenue is
recognized not only by Edina, but also by the state as a 'through' street. At no
point along the entire route of Tracy Avenue is traffic allowed to enter Tracy
from the adjacent feeder streets without observing posted Stop signs at all
intersections.
We ask that you take the points addressed in this letter under consideration
prior to the February 3rd Edina City Council meeting and strongly urge that
you not disrupt our neighborhood and to simply leave the current and long
established traffic pattern as is.
Sincerely,
Helen Deshler / Kevin Deshler / Ann Deshler
6621 Galway Drive
Edina, MN 55439
941 -1982
December 15, 1991
City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424
Re: Traffic Study
Tracy Avenue - West 66th Street to West 70th Street
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council:
We, the residents of Tracy Avenue, have reviewed the study
completed by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc., and have decided that the
recommendation they have given you - Traffic Diverters, Pattern D,
exhibit 9, would equitably solve the traffic problem that exists on
Tracy Avenue.
We strongly urge the council to seriously consider this as a viable
solution to our traffic problem. This problem exists today because
of decisions made to permit industrial park development subsequent
to the planning and design of our neighborhood development.
The solution is equitable, preventing traffic flowing into the
neighborhood East of Tracy Avenue.
The council has acknowledged that we have a legitimate problem,
and has rejected the previous requests for the installation of stop
sign(s). This solution is the result of a recommendation made by
a consultant you have selected. Therefore, we insist that it be
seriously considered by the council, and action taken on it as soon
as possible.
Respectfully,
The residents .of Tracy Avenue
The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the
findings of the Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic
study:
Name Address Home Telephone
�)U Jo/- (N1oni G7 o s-
6,72
tA
13 Tracy
U
G
94 --U
10
The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the
findings of the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic
study:
Name Address Home Telephone
S V sue_ 23s6
x'70/ GD /-S
OiLA' i
Z / rA
1� 7e) % TAw 6i
Q�� Ursa
-197S6
The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the
findings of the Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic
study:
Name Address Home Telephone
c29- 7.s-sg
cif
INTERLA.CHEN COUNTRY CLUB 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 TEL. (612) 929 -1661
January 17, 1992
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Matters regarding the traffic study on Tracy Avenue.
To Whom It May Concern:
We feel that, with the heavy volume already created as a
result of both the junior and senior high schools adjacent to
Antrim and Valley View Roads, and the traffic "flow through"
between our neighborhood and the Industrial Park (located
between 70th and 78th Street off of Cahill Road), any re-
routing of traffic would be more than our area could absorb.
Please give this serious consideration.
Sincerely, %
'd
Bill & Kidd
6824 Antrim Road
Edina, MN 55439
lVk /oe'
oe rI MA 11127 4i:'
2/. �. d•Jt y
't �
< < •Y PV,, TG �- �t .- f'
da L.ttd:�e c iaf L 1.7 /Cic+se X14. li✓z t7 -t /✓iGc�. 4ue� T�rof�
0771 >` • r �.4 rc J ao� d C
� �r 'c%c. / a•r w Gt• t �7(rr<:: f � � `'�— �ir ifs- ��: ✓... � 7`-
Gid�acGe:i2,f� �fpuiGLL/" �O�V �Kt :<�i,De�fG/ L✓`u��`O' �Ct� Ge/i7t{' '� /S �y M?6��+r5• ��- ,
.�C:c:�'ff � •f�csz. �,Jl �i'f i ✓t: O•� y� /sdc� �i•vc�/c�L/ (.��ii /� �"'�lcrf� � <[`cifC ✓��„✓
�jucl Cil%!7� 4w •� cl.� .S7`*'r °� /c't "�-3f /:wA::ll //i /e —�j /7' E/i 70 �.
,f�is+cc
"14
w� ✓/d .�.�/ �..� /may /�re�� csc.i-
C 2L� C C r e 1GJ
CC/W-
/`.-+2I/ 9Ci-'d -G fF?+�lr s e c •t%eG •. �/cJ
r/ HK �'SSZfr
/J 4,)z: tr..IC:��. 7`!i A "//e Ar
erN S/ _7 ;o &&,j er mad A%ov -,41 7-) rJff•e -e ;i" et 7`' jai` y. %/
�L�.�7`i1`r �kc � %w ���� c t� �.: '�c /, +i :+•17�r ���+I� r.� j•!� a /•c�r�l I` Lr�� ` flr c ..�
LAC /r.. l.u/ �sa /c .1�' a Af q%�• ',�iF.: .[ �/.•/ %.• � i •• / +•-
/ � � � f✓G � CL.� >L'f G� l /`' Lac' L>� Sl'li7�t!/LH / /J1��
Al It z //y/ %`b�f rd z/ 41 /� tcllf c/p.d' '� L✓hc -� C�•, /vt'.y uJt••�e.1T �cr✓ .�s�
70;6.. �� C_ X' t :.+ /t �c cJ �5 � J`pyJ C� L� ✓s �: t 6!r y y
/
/ �i • Tm�.t �" ' 7Z4 'tC '�3 M't' y � � �t .S7r:�,� .S /S .r Lc) •� /i,�Li7LC1'_.
�.r+'f c ✓ /f•� /' 0:.. 7�C ��cc�.•as�r. -y cI /`:.Li7'�i /`s °7+� /c.. � tf.� Zt(e� /f y/ 1JC 4: /'•Y rye/ irao�
� /�vc:- ST'rd 3'g .r eu..�r > /e..cZ .3 /'1,.,., /x! �jn F,,r�Jc•�f. /-,� / Tom'
3/ U✓C s'v•�e% �':n.�0/2 'ssJLV.- 7� /we- :S!`�c C:r.�..74ac� i9�'C✓ ii /�+g �y.tC.I�
�!I' �� �117/P�" .��vsi�l 4r`c r.' _ rod / c/ �j � tliiJ / •senc Zll� Is 2 c7�e /!
/� / GC/a.• er c�i /%lac
.► .00 t I�Ej� o/r►� f .�i.rcE Wt Lizve Jr.e �eaJL g'^o+✓ /�i I K 1`�<' 4 �f / / /LG Q.ri�
Glr;f �s)T .S�.+ccf �,..ca G.•/�!/ al f%•
�/isv /o►l� �,y0 +C' �`.�. �v,i �as�f %�r:'Z f rr.♦ / +le rfe� /
604 Cahill Poad
Edina. NAN 55439
January 19. 1,992
"; na City Council
+01 west 50th Street
=diva. MN 55424
=e: Tracv Avenue - west 66th Street to West 70th Street
,c:nc!i Merrb -s.
e sTongiy oppose acomion of sne measures suggested by the Decemoer 6 1991
of 5RF - onsuiting Engineers regarding the traffic problems of west 65:h -01.-eet tc
V st 70th Sleet because:
;1] Access to Highway 62 `cr those residents living on Hillside. ! mer!cK and Cahill
Road wiil be verb; inconvenient. This is particulariiy true for those of us iivinq
between 66th and 68th Streets. The time and distance required to gain access to
Highway 62 is approximately tripled.
'2] The re ;u!red time for emergency vehicles to reach our i►nmed!ate n- e!ghhorhCod
is sureiv. in=creased substant!ai!v.
suggest tl':at cCnslderat!on De given to:
-- i
11 Making ?Pie tar ^ye roaaways aireaey in existence on 'Nesi 10th, Alnmm, . and
Vaiiey View serve their !ntenced purpose in carrying the bulk of the rusn hour traffic
by removing the stop signs on these roads which are now aiscouraging their use.
(2] Placing stow signs on smaller streets to discourage their use for "",rough" traffic.
31 Strict enforcement of speed and stop sign compliance.
-panic you for your consideration.
Sincereiv.
January 20, 1992
6613 Cahill Road
Edina, MN 55439
Dear City Council Members,
Our family is writing to strongly protest the proposal to use traffic diverters
to change traffic flow in our neighborhood. We do not wish to have our
streets blocked by traffic diverters, whether permanent or temporary. The
following are some specific reasons why we dislike this proposed plan:
1) Pattern D. the consultant's recommended pattern, would limit access
to Cahill Road between 66th and 68th, so that the only way in or out
would be from 70th Street. This would add at least 5 minutes to
emergency vehicle response time. Since this block is backed by Nine
Mile Creek, 1 think we must consider the fact that an extra five
minutes in response time could mean the difference between life
or death for a drowning victim.
2) Our main way out of this neighborhood is 66th Street to Tracy
Avenue. We object to having streets blocked that we use many
times daily to reach our own house.
3) We have a child attending Creek Valley Elementary School. This
blockage of streets would also add to the length of time she would
need to ride the bus, since the bus would have to wind around to
pick up children. It may even be necessary to add another bus route
in order to pick up all the children.
We probably would not object to the use of additional stop signs to slow
down traffic which would like to use this area as a thoroughfare. We
definitely consider it to be a residential area, where slow and careful driving
should be the norm. Perhaps we should use the money saved in traffic
diverters and consultants to have an extra police or safety officer to patrol
the streets to enforce existing speed laws and stop signs.
Again, we strongly protest any use of traffic diverters in this neighborhood.
Please listen to the voices of the residents, rather than your consultant.
Sincerely,
Eugene and Penny Kranz
Annette Grosse
6601 Galway Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55430
1 -25 -92
- Lear 14r. Hoffman:
I attended the meeting at the Lutheran Church last
night, ano am one of the huge majority .hat is
strcngly against any changes in the traffic patterns
in the Trac-r, Galway, etc. area. I firmly believe
it wculd only cause more problems.
I sincerely, hone you will agree with this grnUD
(and the many others., and that no changes will be
made.
Sincerely,
Annette Grosse
.� ;a,&)^.����y�deq���
� e
i l
Paz
i.
January 22, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Review of Traffic Report Scheduled for February 3, 1992
City Council:
My family and I are residents at 6717 Galway Drive in Edina and we wish to
express our opposition to the Consulting Engineers' recommended Traffic
Diverters - Pattern D as a solution to rush hour traffic on Tracy Avenue from
West 66th to West 70th Street.
The diverters would cause difficulty in commuting to work, shopping,
deliveries, add to visitor frustration, and an unappealing traffic monument.
It reminds me of driving in Seville, Spain where diverters and short streets
caused us to hire a cab to lead our car out of the maze.
We recommend that the streets be left as they are.
January 27, 1992
To:
Edina City Council
Charles F. Wilharm
5601 Hillside Court
Edina, Mn. 55439
I am writing to express my opinion on the proposed plan to change the
streets in my neighborhood because I will not be in town on the 4th. of
February to attend the hearing.
I am strongly opposed to the proposed changes. I do not believe that I
should be inconvienced by not being able to go South on Hillside Lane
because someone else is complaining that they have too much traffic in
front of their hone.
I do a lot of walking in the area in question and I do not believe that
there is that much traffic to warrant such drastic changes.
I have seen those street dividers in Southwest Minneapolis and I think
they look terrible not to mention the inconvience they cause. I also wonder
if the changes would cause delays in epmrgency vehicles reaching hones.
I can't believe that our public officials in Edina would spend the tax
payers money to even write up and mail out such a ridiculous plan.
Sincerely:
•
j anuary 1992
Mr. Francis .3. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Chairman of the Edina Traffic c=ommittee
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear .Mr. Hoffman
Everyone to whom i have spoken about the planned construc-
tion of diverters in our neighborhood has his or her own reasons
for opposing them. in our particular area it is the incredible
inconvenience it would :ause us. My nearest neighbors on
Hillside l-are would have to travel -i-2- miles more than thev
presently do to get to r..he Cross Town Highway. This is also the
added distance required for an emergency vehicle to get to their
houses from The Fire Station. i and my neighbors on the other
side of the planned diverter would have to Travel an extra
mile to get to 70th :Street if we snake our way through the neigh-
borhood and .75 mile if we so around on Valley View and Antrim.
Finally I would have to drive 1.6 miles to drive from my garage
to my front door. Our immediate neighborhood would be divided
down the middle.
No one, including the residents on Tracy Avenue who origi-
nated this action could possibly profit from it. Any reduction
in rush hour traffic on Tracy Avenue would ba more than made up
for by the local traffic added by the Travel required of the area
residents.
The truth is �there is no reasonable action that can be 'aken
in our neighborhood that will improve the traffic there. ask
that the City of Edina do the right thing. That is, leave things
as they are.
s
Sincerely yours,
E. Keith Betz
6600 Hillside bane,
Edina, MN 55439
January 23, 1991
City of Edina
Attn Mayor Fred Richards
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
Victor Bodnia and Barbara Bodnia
6709 Hillside Lane
Edina, Mn. 55439
Re: Traffic Rerouting Tracy Avenue
Dear Mayor Richards,
The purpose of this letter is to express my opposition to rerouting and or detouring traffic
from Tracy Avenue to Hillside Lane. I sympathize with the people living on Tracy Avenue;
however, it was their responsibility to investigate traffic patterns when they decided to buy
on that street. My opposition to the rerouting including alternative nine is as follows:
o It would be a major problem for us to have any temporary or permanent blocks on
our street to reroute traffic. We would experience significant time and expense over
a long period (added gas and time) just to leave our neighborhood. If what the
consultants say that the average trips is 10 per household per day, one can add up
the added expense and especially time.
o We have four small children and would not want to any more traffic on our street
than we already have. A positive spin to the rerouting would possibly decrease traffic
on our streets but at what expense.
o We have some elderly persons living in our neighborhood which have needed
emergency service. I would think that putting in detours would significantly slow the
response time.
I would suggest you take the proposals back to the drawing boards and start over again or
scrap the idea. One suggestion is to do something in the industrial park area (ie Cahill
Road) and possibly detour traffic down there. It is bad policy to inconvenience and change
traffic patterns for all the people living in our subdivision for the benefit of say 10
households on Tracy Avenue. I will be at the February 3, 1992 meeting to protest the
rerouting alternatives.
Sincerely, c�
Victor Bodnia
cc ran Hoffman Craig Swanson
January 24, 1992
Frederick S. Richards, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Res Tracy'Avenue Neighborhood
'Traffic Study
Dear Mr. Richards:
To impose traffic obstacles and restrictions
upon hundreds of residents in order to placate
12 -14 Tracy Avenue households by construction:._
of diverters Would be absurd.
Over and above the severe inconvenience is the
concern of how such longer it will require for
tke fire and life support personnel to respond
to emergencies witkin the neigkborkood.
Respectfully,
Gordon W. Nelson
6712 Hillside Lane
Edina, MN 55439
I
1.
January 21, 1992
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424 -1394
Attn: City Council
Dear Sirs:
RE: Traffic Pattern Study
Tracy Avenue - W. 66th Street to W. 70th Street
As a resident in the area, I was struck by two things:
1. Why good money was ever spent on this study (and
particularly its recommendations).
2. Great - Traffic problem in one area - just divert the same
problem to another area!
Common sense will tell you that the traffic migration problem
from Crosstown - Tracy - 70th - 100 is the result-of the driving
public perceiving that it takes less time to go this route than
to continue on 66 to 100.
The answer to the problem is not a series of traffic diverters
which are expensive and will only disrupt that unique harmony of
the neighborhood. I believe that, despite what is claimed by our
friendly consulting engineers, that stop signs can work and are
certainly more cost effective. (Witness the remarkable change on
70th when stop signs were erected at Tracy). Remember, if the
driving public perceives that there are too many stop signs, that
driving public will also perceive that the route is too slow and
will find another alternative.
Stop signs are at least worth a try.
i e 1 ,
James A. Steven
7000 Lee Valley Circle
6713 Limerick Lane
Edina, MN 55439
January 20, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
W MMAIM MA M7 MI
Please do not ruin our neighborhood and destroy our access streets.
This is in regard to Pattern D(Figure 9) the monstrous plan of closing West
66th Street and Hillside that deprives us of (1)fire protection, (2)emergency
ambulance service, (3)quick police protection, and (4) a second exit.
We are already blocked to the east and north by the creek and park land, now
this plan will close all our accesses to the west and north, too.
If any catastrophe occurs on 68th Street, we, on the north side are trapped
without an escape - ?cute. Be it a plane crash (airport traffic is directly over
us) , house fires, a water main bursting, or a gas explosion (witness Chicago on
1/18/92) that involves street blockade or repair we have no exit.
In fact, if the entrance to 70th Street if closed by accident or fire, we,in
an emergency are at the mercy of fate to excape or obtain help through a
devious maze to locate McGuire Road. Our school bus routes, snow plowing
routes, mail service, garbage service, taxi service, natural gas, electricity,
telephone, and water repair services will all suffer. As it is, we have
difficulty routing people to our street with our existing two accesses (70th
Street and Crosstown 62). Why are we being persecuted because people on Tracy
Ave. won't allow stop signs on their avenue.
I do not feel that Limerick Lane or Hillside are now busy streets and I am
shocked that we are being shut off from vital services, and subjected to such
isolation and abuse (also subject to increased fire insurance premiums) because
of our vulnerability to delay (long distance from fire station) or no assistance
on an isolated dead -end trap.
As "Figure 3 and Figure 4" are not included in the brochure, I question "poor
stop sign compliance ", the truth is we need more 4-way stop signs right now for
safety. Stop signs at intersections would discourage non - residents from
speeding and taking short cuts through the neighborhood. We natives do comply
with stop signs.
Further, I question who and why anyone is trying to fix something that isn't
broken. It would please me if you would reopen 68th Street at Valley View Road,
we could use that access, too.
If you must block any entrance, may I suggest that instead of making 3 death traps
(Hillside, Galway and Brook blockages)that you use.a temporary wooden movable
barricade at the point that Tracy and 66th St. jog south(on the lot length where
they head south together). Also put up a "For local traffic only" sign before they
exit Valley View Road to discourage and warn outsiders that the "trail" is closed.
Meanwhile, the local residents will use Hillside Circle or Grace with 66th St. for
access to Crosstown 62, our voting Precinct 11, the fire station, and Valley View
Road. A "Local traffic only" at the 70th St. entrance of Limerick/Hillside and
again at Tracy would channel non - residents up to Antrim, and in time would
encourage them to seek alternate. routes elsewhere. Even detour signs could
rearrange the traffic flow; please, not the proposed expensive "Berlin Walls" to
obstruct our streets, ruin our community, and endanger our lives.
Yours truly,
eHatl
anuary 25, 1�2
6716 Limericx mane
Edina, 11�1n. 554 :
Lear city .',ouncil:
Regarding whether any alteration to our street system is warranted.
Fifteen years ago when we were buying our home in Edina, we were informed
at that time busy streets are, 70th., 66th, 50th., Tracy, Valley View,
France, and 400dale. Our choice was not to live on a busy street or in
a dead end. I feel it's unjuit to penalize an intire community with
heavier taxes, plus the inconvience to accommodate one street of residents.
If the traffic has upset those residents so much and their life style,
maybe they should be looking for quiet neighborhood, instead of penalizing
a complete neighborhood.
To put traffic diverters or a maze would inconvience everyone and
if an emergencey in need of a fire truck or ambulance became confused
do to the maze and took that extra few minuets to reach that resident,
it could mean life or death to that person. just how would you justify
that to a family member? Are we really such a group of selfish people
that we mink only of ourselves, and don't care now much inconvience we
cause for everyonelse involved?
,vhy not add stop signs, speed beariers, reduce speed to i5 m.p.h..and
if necessary have an office monitor afew areas durning rush hour for
traffice -violators. and give tickets. I am sure a few tickets, slower
speed limits, and going over afew of those speed beariers will detour
traffice off the side streets. The reason people cut thrc-.ich is they
want to avoid stop signs, and any slow speed limits. This would =i15o
discourage our car racing up and down the streets in the nice weather
at all hours of day and night. All our streets could use afew more stop
signs for those speeders that have little regard for children at play.
I am :•ery much against putting us in a maze by putting up traffice
diverter-s. I use crosstown daily to go to and come from work, and I
feel my rights as an Edina citizen have been invaded if you put traffic
diverter-, or make our neighborhood a maze and increase our taxes, by
putting i:.o diverters which will never come down once they are in place.
I strong- -;T feel this problem can be curtailed much easier then rerouting
our entire neighborhood and making everyones life more inccnvientant.
Sincerely,.
�GCS -use- ��
anice L. Brantley
ACONCERNED zX PAYER
isY
/ p � ' i � li'�iG'�i�tL%� `'U L�� �� —C�� ' 6✓� ^c�Gs�'/�' � %CktCr
Ir
1
- , " zwy/ �;
�` 6
5720 W. 68tVe�
From the desk of ...
ANDY WEINGARTNER
(612) 540.5519
i 1 &Z,
—!C �Z )
�,PJN
L
107-
cQ1A4 oT�-
ifce,� �,�
�. D i,tJ
>E ;son _ s
INS= MIY'?!2' • Minneapolis, MN 55441
j
E
17 ��-
January 16, 1992
Edina -ity Council
4801 Nest 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear City Council Members:
we have recently become aware of traffic barriers being
considered for installation in our neighborhood. The
reasons for the installations are insignificant compared to
"-'ne --nconvience these installations would cause all members
of the neighborhood. In order to divert 2500 cars. 3,200
-ars .could be asked to drive around in circles in order to
access 70th Street or the Crosstown. These 3,200 trips will
ce made by 320 neighborhood residents on the average of 10
rimes per day, day in ana day out. The wasted gas and time
this would require is bad public policy.
Tracy is a busy street. It has always been a busy street.
People who bought homes on Tracy bought homes on a busy
street. It s unfair 1:.o ask all other members of the
Neighborhood to be inconvenienced to turn Tracy into private
street with very limited access.
Please reject the proposed " temporary" barriers recommended
by the Traffic Safety Committee. This is not a traffic
issue. 'Out rather a few resident's preference. The
,,ea: -ublic issue is emergency vehicle access to all
,eisnborhooa streets. These barriers would interfere.
7
?Sandra and Michael Fox
s-801 West 68th Street
Edina, MN 55439
944 -7993
2220 Lincoln Centre, 333 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402
January 27, 1992 Phone: (612)342 -2882 Fax: (612)342 -2885
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Gentlemen:
It is my understanding that on February 3, 1992, the Council will discuss diversion of Rush
hour traffic from the city collector streets on to Tracy Avenue from West 66th to West 70th
Street. Unfortunately, I will be out of the city on that day, and hope that my comments in
writing may be helpful.
I drove down Tracy and counted 11 houses that front on that street. I drove down Antrim
Road and 70th to the point where it joins Tracy and counted 23 homes. In all fairness, it
seems incongruous to direct the traffic in front of 23 homes in order to reduce the traffic in
front of 11 homes.
The concentration on traffic on Antrim Road will increase by 50 %, the cars passing the stop
sign next to the Edina High School. I cannot believe that the engineers could conclude that
it would be logical to increase the traffic by 50% next to the school. Our children are under
enough dangers of being hit by fast moving cars without increasing the traffic pressure at
that corner.
The emergency vehicles are going to be hampered leaving the station on the other side of
the 62nd Street Crosstown in getting anywhere in Edina. An extra two minutes may mean
the difference between life and death. I cannot believe that you would increase the traffic
that they must negotiate in order to reduce the traffic in front of 11 homes.
I would suggest that you leave things as they are and do what can be done to reduce the
rush hour problems occurring on the Crosstown. A letter to the employers in the area
asking that they stagger their work hours would make life a lot easier for everyone. The
traffic flow through this section of Edina will not be solved by shifting cars within that area.
The only permanent solution will be to resolve the rush hour traffic which is flooding
Highway 100. Please do not increase the traffic 50% on Valley View, Antrim and part of
70th to make it easier on 11 houses. The way it is now, we all share the excess traffic which
is as it should be.
Sincerely,
Miles W. McNal yl , CL , ChFC
7001 L mham Lcxne,
Insurance & Annuities for Business & Personal Plans
5716 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
January 26, 1992
Fred Richards, Mayor
City Hall
-- 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mayor Richards:
I am against the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our
neighborhood.. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the
neighborhood and make driving difficult for residents. In addition, the fire
department has indicated that diverters will increase the service time for
fire and other emergency vehicles. The plan which would increase traffic on
McGuire Rd does not consider that there is a neighborhood park at the head
of the circle where many small children play both summer and winter.
Many of the McGuire and Brook residents have moved on those streets
specifically to have easy access to the park for their children.
I am compeletely opposed to any plan to change the traffic patterns in the
neighborhood. Tracy Avenue has only 12 houses facing on it. All of the
proposals would greatly increase traffic to many more households while
decreasing it for only these few. Once more, I oppose any change.
Sincerely,
Daniel N. Phillips
5716 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
January 26, 1992
Fred Richards; Mayor
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mayor Richards:
I have carefully read and discussed the proposal for diverting traffic from
Tracy Avenue and through other parts of the existing neighborhood. The
proposal to place traffic diverters would split the neighborhood and make
travel for residents difficult. In addition, the fire department has indicated
that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency
vehicles. The plan which would increase traffic on McGuire Rd does not
consider that there is a neighborhood park at the head of the circle where
many small neighborhood children play. Many of the McGuire and Brook
residents have moved on those streets specifically to have easy access to the
park for their children.
I am compeletely opposed to any plan to change the traffic patterns in the
neighborhood. Tracy Avenue has long been the main through street. People
have purposely bought on other streets in the neighborhood in order not to
have that traffic. We have been able to minimize traffic by trucks and this is
sufficient. Again, I oppose any change.
Sincerely,
Jan T. Phillips
Doug and Jackie Davidson
6612 Hillside Lane
Edina, MN 55439
January 24, 1992
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E., Director of Public Works
City Of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
RE: TRAFFIC STUDY /TRACY AVE - WEST 66TH ST TO WEST 70TH
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
We are in receipt of your letter regarding the above traffic
study conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. My wife and family
live in the affected neighborhood, and we want to go on record as
being opposed to the recommended traffic diversion pattern "D," and
to all of the other suggested possible alternatives. We are also
opposed to implementation on a trial or temporary basis.
We think that it would be ridiculous to turn the entire neighbor-
hood into an Alice -in- Wonderland maze because of somewhat higher
than desired traffic on Tracy Avenue.
We moved to this neighborhood almost four years ago. A major con -
sideration.in our move was the fact that our previous home, also
in Edina, was on a busy street. The point is that we moved, we
did not try to restructure our neighborhood and inconvenience all
of our neighbors just to accomodate ourselves.
A major consideration in choosing to live in our current neighbor-
hood was the fact that it was an established neighborhood, and
that traffic patterns would not likely change. We consider this
"retro -fit" to accomodate the 12 houses that face Tracy Avenue to
be unconscionable.
The people that live on Tracy knew, or should have known, what
they were getting into before they purchased their homes. Tracy
Ave. is an exit off of Crosstown. You would expect it to carry
some traffic.
The traffic study admits that the traffic'diverters are an
"inconvenience" and that many neighborhoods that have them request
that they be removed. The study also admits to the creation of a
safety hazard due to increased emergency vehicle response time.
For these and other reasons, we are opposed to the changes.
?1n c y,
glas Davidson
Donald L Madsen
6716 Hillside Lane
Edina, Minnesota 55439
(612) 941 'l 340
7anuar fT
Mr. Francis J. Hoffir:an P. 'E.
Director of Public Wcrks
ity _ Edina
1810 W. 50th st.
L'1A111C1, 1'l1Y JC'4G4 -1.J. Q.''S
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
I ie traff is Study and f indincrs that were made recently r, :.r
the neighborhood which includes --.ur street Hillside. -Lane_, has
certainly generated a Great deal of interest and concern for us as
re-sidents. The traffic patterns and levels that exist todav seem
to be reasonable Tor this neighborhood and any chancres to the
streets that would niter the flow seem totally unwarranted.
We have 'Lived in our house for 34 vears and life rur area
very much. it has hood access to 70th, to the Crosstown and `.o 494
and * he chances ::at are shown in :i of f i . pattern °:�" woL l d
1�
disrupt these accesses and :could divide th& neian-t- rhood. ?lease
'Lave- `he streets as they are.
Mv wife and I would like ro ,tronaly voice ,sir 0AP"3it4, -n to
am; changes to the neighborhood that would affect a chance to the
existing traffic patterns. Please enter our r-osition on this
matter before the City Council meeting on February 3, 199:.
�incereiy,
Donald L. Madsen
January 28, 1992
Mr. Fran Hoffman
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman:.
This letter is in regards to the Tracy Avenue Traffic Study. I
live on Hillside Court and find that blocking off the streets
designated on the map you sent out, would be very inconvenient to
me.
Anyone living in Edina knows that Tracy Ave. is a main street and
is expected to have some traffic. The people on Tracy Ave. are
fairly new residents and if they didn't know this fact, they should
have been told by a realtor or surveyed the area before purchasing
their home. There are approximately 11 homes facing Tracy who would
be directly involved on the traffic change and many more residents
would be inconvienced on this change.
As for myself I use Hillside Lane to get to 70th St. and by closing
this street off I would have to go out to Valley View to Antrim
then down 70th just to get to, for example, I use Lewis Park for my
kids, also to get to 494 or Highlands.
I also worry about emergencies. If a police officer was on 70th and
I was in need of his assistance, instead of taking the direct route
of Hillside Lane, he would have to go way out of his way on Antrim
to Valley View Rd., which, because of the delay could be to late.
So I fully oppose this change and let the streets flow the way they
were meant to go.
Sincerely,
f p
Jacki �schuk
5516 H
Ct.
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 8 CIRESI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ATLANTA
2800 LASALLE PLAZA
800 LASALLE AVENUE
BOSTON
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -2015
CHICAGO
TELEPHONE (612) 349 -8500
DALLAS
FACSIMILE (612) 339 -4181
MINNEAPOLIS
NEWPORT B E A C H
SAINT PAUL
SAN FRANCISCO
December 16, 1991
WASHINGTON
Mr. Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
City of Edina
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
PAUL J. EM MON
(612) 349-0612
I would like to communicate to you the concerns .of our family
regarding at least one option being considered as a solution to the
traffic problem on Tracy Avenue in the area between 70th Street
and the Crosstown Highway. I realize that the level of traffic on
Tracy Avenue is excessive, and I agree that some solution is in
order. I am concerned, however, that a solution which satisfies
the concerns of Tracy homeowners may unfairly shift an excessive
burden and risk on those with homes fronting surrounding streets.
I understand that what has been called "Proposal No. 9" from
the consulting engineers involves placing traffic diverters on
Tracv Avenue at Brook Drive, and at least one more on Galway
Avenue. The projected traffic levels after diversion show Brook
Drive traffic increasing over twelve hundred percent (to 630 cars
per day) , and traffic on McGuire Road increasing about four hundred
percent (to 510 cars per day), while traffic on Tracy falls to 260
cars per day.
,Given the number of homes on both Brook Drive and McGuire, as
well as Galway and others affected, and most importantly homes with
children, this increased level of traffic is alarming and
potentially very dangerous. The traffic reduction on Tracy is
admirable and necessary for the protection of homes and children,
but any solution taken must be equitable and come as a result of
a public process with adequate input from homeowners on all streets
involved. It seems that any mutually acceptable solution must
involve -a. greater reduction of -the total - -- traffic volume in the
Mr. Francis Hoffman
December 16, 1991
Page 2
whole neighborhood area, eliminating the non - residential traffic
which is merely using residential streets as means to travel to and
from the Crosstown Highway.
I appreciate your consideration of our views. I would like
to become more informed'as to both the process used and the options
being considered by the City of Edina for this problem. I would
also welcome the opportunity to discuss this problem at greater
lengths after I have had the chance to review further information.
Please call me at the above office, at your convenience, to discuss
further action which may affect the Tracy neighborhood.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Paul J. and,Barb Harmon
5617 Brook Drive
Edina, MN 55439
PJH /be
LAW OFPICES
MESHBESHER & SPENCE, LTD.
iH . .. KBESHER -
iI I. MESHBESHER
'.L M. SPENCE•
H. GILBERT
'. CLIFFORD
R. JOHNSON •••
ORDBY
BERGSTROM
H K. KORAN
. J. BOIVIN•-
).MITTED TO
IN WISCONSIN
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
:SIN • NORTH DAEOTA
Mayor Fred Richards
Deggv Kell
Jane Paulis
Jack Rice
Glen Smith
C/O City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
1616 PARK AVENUE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404
(612) 339 -9121
FAX (612) 339 -9168
REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
January 22, 1992
Re: Traffic Study of Tracy Avenue
Edina City Counsel Members:
MICHAEL C. SNYDER -
JAMES A. WELLNER
JOHN P. SHEEHY
MARK D.STREED
RANDALL O. SPENCE
HOWARD I. BASS
DANIEL C. GUERRERO
KATHERINE S. FLOM
PAMELA R. FINNEY
JEPPREY P. OISTAD
DANIEL E. MESHBESHER
•• ALSO ADIMITTZD TO
PRACTICE IN ILLINOIS
I am writing because I am unable to attend the counsel meeting
set for February 3, 1992 regarding the proposed changes on traffic
patterns around Tracy Avenue. I live at 6700 Cahill Road and would
_be greatly affected by the proposals.
I want to express my adamant opposition to the proposed
traffic diverters. I am quite familiar with these, as I grew up
in the southwest neighborhood where these diverters have been
placed. My mother still lives in that area and the residents are
still upset about the traffic diverters and the disruption of
traffic in the neighborhood. (As a side note, the Alderman, who was
in office at the time those were placed, was not re- elected.)
The traffic diverters are very disruptive to traffic in the
neighborhood. The proposed plan would totally cut me off from
access to Highway 62 which is my primary route. It would force me
to go up to 70th and use Highway 100. I find this extremely
inconvenient. It would also increase the traffic at the very
intersection of Highway 100 and 62 that is the source of the
problem in the first place. I and my neighbors would now be
traveling through that intersection to go on to 62 thus, adding to
the problem that is apparently the cause of the traffic diverting
off of Highway 62 through the neighborhood. Why aggravate the
lerlying problem at the expense of'the residents?
- - I think that- -stop signs would be the- first -step solution to
ST. PA.UL OFFICE: 2600 WORLD TRADE CENTER ST. PAUL, MN .55101
Edina City CounsepESHBESHER & SPENCE, LTD.
January 22, 1992
Page Two
the perceived problem of traffic on Tracy and coming through the
neighborhood. I have lived in this neighborhood for several years
now and I frankly, do not see any problem with traffic coming
through the neighborhood and diverting off of Highway 62. There
may be some increase but it certainly is not of a sufficient level
to totally disrupt the traffic pattern in our neighborhood and cut
us off from access to Highway 62.
Another consideration is the accessibility of safety and
rescue personnel. The fire department and rescue personnel are
just over Highway 62 on the north side. Their current path to our
neighborhood is a very direct going across Tracy bridge and turning
left on 66th and coming directly to our neighborhood. With the
proposed traffic diverter patterns, rescue and fire would have to
go onto Highway 62 through the congested intersection at Highway
100 and 62, south on 100 to 70th and then backtrack through the
neighborhood to our neighborhood. Are you prepared to undertake
responsibility for the potential emergency response delay? .
If traffic through the neighborhood is a problem,the severity
of which I question, then the least obtrusive solution should be
attempted first. Begin with the stop signs. To write this off as
a solution merely because "poor stop sign compliance should be
expected" is a poor excuse and does not fit with my experience.
Occasional enforcement days by the police will be more than
sufficient to insure compliance. Several stop signs in a row would
certainly defer me from taking any alternate short cuts off the
highway.
Stop signs should certainly be tried before the radical step
of putting in traffic diverters especially for what I perceive as
a minor problem. If this does not solve the problem or reduce it,
the issue -could be reconsidered.In any event I still maintain my
adamant opposition totraffic diverters.
If you have questions or would like to discuss it further,
please feel free to call. My home telephone number is 941 -0170 and
my work number is 339 -9121.
Respectfully,
Dennis Johnson
DRJ /bjs
January 23, 1992
5412 Creek View Lane
Edina, MN 55439
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
We have read with interest the proposed solution to the
commuter traffic problems in the "Tracy Avenue Neighborhood" of
Edina. We have long been aware of this growing traffic flow
rate and the high speeds at which they often travel through our
neighborhood. Thankfully we are not aware of any tragic
accidents that have been caused by this traffic increase. This
is especially true as the neighborhood does not have the
protection provided by sidewalks. Your actions to solve this
problem are warranted and overdue.
In evaluating your consultants recommended solution
(Pattern D), it seems to us that this solution results in a
greater inconvenience to Edinans than to the commuters. This
answer not only makes it more difficult to conduct our daily
neighborhood affairs, but (as the report acknowledges)
increases most emergency response times.
It seems to us that a solution which mandates the exclusive use
of the areas "major thoroughfares" to gain access to the
industrial sections of the city would be more appropriate.
Construction (for example) of full or part -time baricades which
require exclusive accesses - from Highway 100 and /or
Interstate 494 would be a more satisfactorily solution. This
would assure that the large majority of the commuters would use
the major arteries - which is the principle reason for their
existance: This, when coupled with staggered starting and
quitting times, would be workable and minimize the effect on
the neighborhoods. Please note that we do not consider West
70th Street to be a "major thoroughfare" and should not be
included as part of this proposed access system.
Yes, this proposal would be more costly that the solution your
consultants offered. However, we would suggest that the cost
of any solution should be borne by the parties who created this
situation and benefit from the use of our streets - the
industrial area property owners. This is a cost of doing
business-. - - -- -- -
January 23, 1992
Page two
We realize that the Edina property owners have benefited from
the tax base provided by the industrial area and (for the most
part) we value their presence. Nevertheless, the city's
greater concerns should be for the daily lives of the
residents. Asking the citizens to inconvenience themselves,
for up to ten trips per day, when other viable options are
available, is inconsiderate at best and arrogant at worst.
Please solve this problem, but not in away which
inconveniences our neighborhood, raises our taxes or otherwise
"siphons off" funds which could be put to work for the benefit
of the entire community.
Sincerely,
ryce and Peggy Alexander
JANUARY 23, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Messrs. Fred Richards, Mayor
Jack Rice
Glen Smith
Ms. Peggy Kelley
Jane Pauly
Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and
West 70th Street by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc.
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
Our names are Dr. and Mrs. Wendell H. Hall, owners. We have lived since 1961
at 6609 Galway Drive, Edina, MN. 55439. Dr. Hall was employed on the staff
of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center 1948 - 1986. In 1986 he retired as a
result of disability and spends the winter (Dec. - March) in Florida, residing
at 2381 Sunset Ave. Apt. 310, Lake Worth, FL. 33461. Tel (407) 582 -3265.
We understand the Tracy Ave. problem and we sympathize with the families who
chose to live there. We strongly object to the recommended changes. They will
solve nothing but will create important new safety hazards. Old- timers like
us remember the fight in the early 1950's when the Hamm Brewing Co. proposed
to build high -rise apartments on the Crosstown near the railroad crossing - we
won that time and we do not give up easily. We do not believe your consultants
hake actually looked at this hilly area with its crooked streets and sharp
90 turns immediately next to these hills. At one time the area led into
"Chapel Hills ". The original farm buildings were situated just south of
the present Edina High School - the hills drain into Nine Mile Creek just
north and east of the area.
This residential area is changing. Elders are leaving its large houses - younger
families with numerous small children are buying them. There is a nice playground
with space for future park development south of Nine Mile Creek at 66th and
Hillside Lane. We have frequently observed small children running across and
into the nearby streets. Yet Edina has already re- directed school bus traffic
from Tracy Ave. to Galway Drive. This is creating a new hazard. We have
twice observed Edina snow -plows become so stuck in drifts on the steep hill
in front of our house they were forced to abandon plowing Galway Drive. They
easily keep Tracy Ave. open in winter. Often in the winter the only feasible
access to Galway Drive is from the south (by 68th or McGuire Road).
The proposed traffic patterns ignore the causes of the problem on Tracy Ave.,
which are 1) increased auto traffic on 70th westbound from Metro office park,
2) the new Ron Clark development on 70th at Cahill Rd. (replacing Cahill school
and 3) the new complex of stores at that intersection.
Sincerely,, ,
Wendell H. Hall, MD
Muriel H. Hall
6609 Galway Drive
Edina, MN. 55439
cc. Ken Roslund, City Manager
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer ✓
Traffic Safety Committee
William Crawford
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
Address
From : BIOPRODUCTS INC. MPLS,MN
PAGE 1 OF 2
January 21, 1992
Facsimile Transmittal
To: Edina City Council
City Hall
4801 West 50th street
Edina, MN 55424
From: Trudi Meloche
5820 West 68th
Edina, MN 55439
FAX: (612) 927 -7645
FAX: (612) 941 -8758
Dear. Mayor Richards and City Council Members;
Regarding the traffic study concerning Tracy Avenue between
West 66th and West 70th street currently being considered by
the Council, I have the following concerns.
The recommendation by Strgar Roscoe Fausch, Inc. to close
Tracy Avenue in two places and close Brook Drive in one
place would, at best, result in a lot of inconvenience for
those of us who live on the side streets off of Tracy
Avenue. Since receiving the notice of the proposed changes
I have kept a log of our family's trips and was somewhat
suprised to learn that we used Tracy Avenue over fourty
times in one week. We have tried the alternative route as
suggested by the aforementioned study. The extra time and
gas aside, we are struck by how many children live and play
on the alternate route, specifically at the park between
McGuire Road and Brook Drive. The study estimates on Page 2
that our neighborhood generates an average of 3,200 trips a
day which ostensibly would be routed past McGuire Park. This
problem alone should merit further study, but I have other
concerns.
As a homeowner with small ehildern, I am very concerned with
emergency vehicle response time. Diverting an ambulance
through an extra four blocks of curving roads would add
life or death minutes to and from the hospital.1 Finding an
alternative that would restrict traffic but allow emergency
vehicles quick access is preferable. The study doesn't
mention emergency access until its last point, but I'm sure
most residents would rate it as a priority concern.
Lastly,,I have some interest in the proposed rerouting of
traffic onto Antrim Road and Valley View Road. While I
understand that these streets are the designated "collector"
streets for local traffic, they are also_the_streets_ where
our nigh- School and Junior High School students walk after
school and various activities. Perhaps the study's
assumption-that-"significant-increase-in traffic volumes on
P01
PAGE 2 OF 2
these collector streets was acceptable to the city and it's
residents" (Pg. 2) should be re- evaluated with this in mind.
The problem, as I understand it, is that traffic from the
industrial park is cutting through our neighborhood to
access Highway 62 when they should be taking highway 100 or
the "collector" streets. The recommended solution of
closing Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive would cost an
estimated $40,000.00. Cheaper and easier alternatives, such
as turn restriction signs, were not studied because they
would require "prohibitively high level of police
enforcement" (Pg 3). It seems to me that $40,000 would buy
an adequate amount of police enforcement for turn
restriction signs and, as with the temporary block -offs,
over time the "through traffic pattern" would "break ".
Thank you for your time and consideration.
(,Ln
Trudi F. IKeloche
Resident
BASF
n
Albert F. Wise, CLU
The Prudential
Chartered Financial Consultant
Insurance Company
of America
January 27, 1992
OFFICE:
3585 N. Lexington
St. Paul, MN 55126
490.1435
Francis J. Hoffman, Chairman
RESIDENCE:
6713 Galway Drive
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
Edina, MN 55435
City Hall
941 -2634
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
ftdenha/
RE: Traffic Study
Tracy Ave, W. 66th St, to
W. 70th St
Dear Fran:
On January 16th, I sent a letter to Mayor Fred Richards regarding
the Tracy Avenue traffic study. This was after visiting with you
in your office. I am enclosing a copy of that letter along with a
copy of Bill Craig's letter to Mayor Richards.
On Thursday, January 23rd, a committee meeting was held to discuss
this situation. Mary Durben, from the SUN CURRENT, was at that
meeting and asked for information regarding comments that I made.
I am enclosing a copy of my letter to her.
It seems that there are three major alternatives to this situation:
1. Reduce the traffic with signage. The "No Thru Truck Traffic"
sign has worked very well. Perhaps a "No Thru Traffic" sign
would do just as well.
2. Make it difficult to get through the area with traffic
diverters. This, of course, divides the area, is costly
and inconvenient for the residents, and could be dangerous
for emergency vehicles. It would probably force traffic
to go on Valley View and Antrim, which is the only
Municiple State Aid Road in this area.
3. Leave things as they are but send the traffic where it
causes the least disturbance to the residents. That is
outlined in my letter to Mary Durben.
I look forward to seeing you on Monday, February 3rd.
Best wishes.
Si c r y,
Albert F. Wise, CLU
Chartered Financial Consultant
,mew
Albert F. Wise, CLU
The Prudential
Chartered Financial Consultant
Insurance Company
of America
January 24 1992
,
OFFICE:
3585 N. Lexington -
St. Paul. MN 55126
490 -1435
SUN CURRENT
RESIDENCE:
6713 Galway Drive
7831 East Bush Lake Rd
Edina, MN 55435
Bloomington, MN 55439
941 -2634
ATTN: Mary Durben
ftdedia/-
RE: Traffic Study
Dear Mary:
Thank you for asking about information on the traffic study
of our area.
As I indicated in my comments, I have read all the material
and visited with the city engineer, Fran Hoffman, in person.
I also talked to Mayor Fred Richards on the telephone and
at his request wrote him a letter. I am enclosing a copy of
that letter and also a letter from Bill Craig.
You can tell from the tone of these two letters why Bill and I
both decided to build on Galway Drive.
You heard last night about the various suggestions to reduce
unwanted traffic through our residential area. It was obvious
that nobody was in favor of the traffic diversion suggestions
made by the consulting engineer.
If things are going to be left as they are, the study I made of
the homes in our area would certainly indicate that traffic
on Tracy and Antrim causes the least disturbance to the residents.
This information is attached.
The general consensus is to do nothing -more than use street signs
that would reduce unwanted traffic.
It was nice meeting you.
Best wishes. -
Sinc ,)
Albert . Wise, CLU
Chartered Financial Consultant
AFW:avw-
u��1
Albert F. Wise, CLU
Chartered Financial Consultant
January 16, 1992
Mayor Fred Richards
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN- -55429
RE: Traffic Study
Tracy Ave, W. 66th St. to
W. 70th St.
Dear Fred:
The Prudential
Insurance Company
of America
OFFICE:
3585 N. Lexington
St. Paul. MN 55126
490 -1435
RESIDENCE:
6113 Galway Drive
Edina, MN 55435
941 -2634
Bmdential
It was a pleasure visiting with you on the telephone the other day.
I am following your suggestion by writing to you about the Tracy
Avenue traffic study.
There are several reasons why I would not like to see changes in the
traffic pattern by my residence at 6713 Galway Drive.
1. We have lived in Edina since 1964. The first 10 years we
were at Duggan Plaza, which is.a quiet street and neighborhood.
In 1974, we decided to look for a larger home. We carefully
looked in the area called The Heights. After a very careful
review, we decided not to buy or build on any of the streets
that appeared to be through.streets. We felt those were
Valleyview, Antrim, West 70th, and Tracy. We finally decided
that Galway Drive provided the quiet atmosphere we were
looking for. We knew we would have to pay more because of
that benefit. It was a good decision and we have been very
happy on Galway Drive. _
2. My wife, Pat, and I walk three to four times a week in our
neighborhood. Because we walk three to five miles, we cover
a lot of ground. We notice homes for sale in the entire area.
We also notice that homes on "through streets" seem to be
for sale for a longer period of time than on non - through
streets. I understand from personal evidence that homes on
these through streets sell for lower prices. It must also be
obvious to the people buying these homes that there is heavier
traffic.on through streets.
Pont
Traffic Study January 16, 1992 Page 2
3. I understand that the through streets referred to above are
Municiple State Aid routes. I presume that is why they are
through streets. To my knowledge, Galway Drive is not a
Municiple State Aid route.
4. I have reviewed the traffic study made by Strgar- Roscoe-
Fausch, Inc. While I am not a "trafficologist ", it appears
to me that any pattern other than the existing conditions
would cause confusion and perhaps dangerous conditions,
especially for emergency vehicles.
Perhaps signs coming into our area from the north and south stating
"No Thru Traffic" would be helpful.
I understand that a traffic study is only accurate if traffic counters
are used in the entire area on the same day.
I appreciate the opportunity to write to you. I am sure you can
appreciate the concern felt by all of the residents in the immediate
area. Our strong recommendation is to allow traffic conditions to
remain as they are. •
Thanks for your help.
Best wishes.
Sincerely,
Alb)err F. Wise, CLU
Chartered Financial Consultant
AFW:avw
T
TRAFFIC
STUDY
HOUSES PER .1 MILE
DISC
TOTAL HOUSES
2.8
STREET
14
.5 mile
Tracy
3.5
21
Antrim Rd
,6 mile
7.2
2. View
Valley
.5 mile
36
8.0
Limerick Ln
1,6
3,
.2 mile
8.4
4. McGuire Rd
,5 mile
42
11.3
5, Hillside Ln
34
,3 mile
6, Galway Dr
January 16, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
�j Messrs. Fred Richards, Mayor
Jack Rice
Glen Smith
Ms. Peggy Kelly
Jane Pauly
Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and West
70th Street by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc.
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
My name is William B. Craig, owner
6701 Galway Drive
Edina, MN 55439
For health reasons my winter address until May Ist 1992 is:
57 High Point Circle West, Apt. #501
Naples, FI 33940
Telephone: (813) 262 -5654
I have been an Edina resident for 42 years, 32 years at this present address.
As former President and CEO of the Automobile Club of Minneapolis (AAA), I was
involved in highway development, Traffic Safety and site selection - building two
headquarter offices during my employment of 46 years.
In 1959 Mrs. Craig and I carefully selected this lot establishing in advance of purchase
certain criteria guidelines.
Location is always a prime consideration. We quickly discarded homes and sites in
Edina that were within two blocks of the Crosstown right of way, then an open field.
Lack of sewers on clay soil, all arterial streets, state aid roads, traffic collectors, were
2
all important criteria, paying particular attention to conditions affecting future growth.
"You don't build a home near an airport, commercial area, or a public beach and then
complain about the noise or traffic." Warren Hyde and staff were very helpful in our
selection process.
I take exception to the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch (SRF) Reports for the following reasons:
1. It destroys a quiet neighborhood into bits and pieces.
2.13asically shunts traffic from Tracy to Galway Drive. The school bus route already
has been shifted to Galway from Tracy.
3. It will lower property tax values. All the homes (12) on the east side of Galway
Drive are on "walk -out" type lots. These are prime sought after properties. I should
know, as this is the second home I've owned with a "walk -out" basement and they're
terrific. All the west side homes on Galway have the living /bedroom areas facing the
street which is not true of Tracy Avenue.
The 1992 market value of my home is $223,700 HMSTD and I paid $4,715.34 in
property taxes in 1991. Naturally I'm concerned and have to oppose any act by the
City Council that will diminish the value of this investment.
4. 1 don't know what the margin of error in the SRF computer model is, but I've been
retired for 5 years and am at home during the day. For SRF to declare Galway Drive
now has 630 cars /day is in gross error and will be 1350 cars /day under plan 81 How
anybody, including the City Council, can accept such a proposal is beyond my
comprehension.
5. The SRF study must have been made in their office and not in the field as terrain
has not been taken into consideration particularly during the winter months.
A. Galway Drive at West 66th Street.
(a) A steep hill impassable many times even after plowing and sanding.
(b) Southbound cars on Galway can't make it up the hill as there is no
acceleration distance for a turning vehicle.
(c)Northbound vehicles going down the hill under the same conditions find it
difficult and hazardous to stop at the blind intersection at West 66th Street.
B. Galway Drive at West 68th Street.
(a) Southbound on Galway will not turn right (west) under slippery conditions
due to steep grade uphill but continues on to McGuire Road where the terrain is flat all
the way to Tracy. Galway Drive residents must have access to McGuire Road.
(b) These vehicles also don't turn left (east) as it's hazardous (loss of control)
due to steep grade downhill with a right turn onto Hillside Lane under same
conditions as (a).
C. West 68th Street.
(a) Vehicles eastbound turning left (north) onto Galway jump the curb and
have hit the fire hydrant under slippery conditions.
D. Consideration should also have been given to this area of higher elevation. It
is the first obstacle for blowing snow across the nine mile creek lowlands. We have
more snowfall and drifting than most other areas in Edina.
In conclusion, I fail to see the logic of destroying a fine neighborhood and lowering it's
property values because a few residents on Tracy Avenue with lower property values
to begin with, a publicly known state aid road, a designated traffic collector since
originally platted, now object to the traffic which it was designed for.
To me it's the same as buying near the airport and then complaining about the noise.
Ladies and gentlemen is this fair to those more prudent when purchasing their homes
and willing to pay more for the locations?
I urge you to leave the present traffic plan on SRF, Figure as is. The cost to all the
'fected homeowners far outweighs those residing on Tracy Avenue.
Thank you,
N-�\
William B. Craig _
6701 Galway Drive
Edina, MN 55439
cc: Ken Roslund, City Manager
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Traffic Safety Committee
January 28, 1992
i-1r. Francis Hoffman. P,E.
Director of Public Works
Edina City Hall
-4801 west 50th Street
Edina, MN 554,214
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
I Appreciated you takinq the time to talk with me last week. As you
suggested I am sending you a letter describing my thoughts and concerns
relating to the question of traffic in the Tracy Ave. neighborhood. Please
include it in the packet of information and responses you provide the Edina
City Council in preparation for the Feb 4 Council meeting.
I have also enclosed a copy of this letter that I would like you to pass
Mona to the Consultina Engineer. As I mentioned to you on the ohone. I am
concerned about the presentation he will be making at the Feb 4meetinq. I
wave a lot of difficulty with his "recommended" changes illustrated in figure
&,
Thanks aqa i n.
�incereiy, ( r
Michael Lil is
'5809 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
942 -5389
I . •S'y�
Letter to Edina City Council Members
regarding proposed changes to Tracy Ave. traffic.
Dear Council Members:
First of all I should state that although I live in the "Tracy Ave.
neighborhood" I personally do not have any traffic problem at all. Our street
is very quiet. Thats one of the main reasons it appeal led to us three ,years
ago when we moved in. Changing traffic patterns can do nothing but create
problems for me.
Secondly, I have three children and a park accross the street. Putting
two and two together I'm sure you can see why the volume of traffic on our
road is a very sensitive topic to me.
Thirdly, I am sympathetic to the desires of others in our
neighborhood to decrease the volume of traffic on Tracy. If we accept the
premise that Tracy was never ment to be anything other than a neighborhood
collector street then it problably is carrying excess commuter traffic and
has been for many years.
Finally, It would not be sensible or fair to make Tracy a quiet
neiahbornood street by turning my street into a busy one. This is I fear
exactly what the Consultinq Engineers recommened proposal -119 would do. On
my street, McGuire Road, traffic would increase oy 4001/"0. In this "solution"
the City would simply be resuf fling homes on busyer and quieter streets,
inconviencing everyone and arbitrarily creating winners ana losers. This
would not be acceptable to homeowners who bought on quiet.streets only to
nave them then become the new neighborhood collector streets.
I have studied the maps created by the Consulting Engineers and I have
been observing trafffic on Tracy at rush hour. I think that the problem 1s
less severe than stated. Tracy has always carried a fair amount of
neighborhood traffic and was always ment to. It is a main collector street
for the Tracy area residents. Perhaps a sign or two is the sensible and more
appropriate solution. I have heard it suggested a that a "NO THRU TRAFFIC"
sign might be appropriate.
cont.
i encourage the Council to respond in a measured and conservative
way to proposals to change Tracy Ave. traffic patterns. For the vast
majority of us in this Edina neighborhood there is no traffic
problem to be solved.
Sincerely
Michael Lilia
5809 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
942 -5.389
January 26,1 991
Note: to Consulting Engineers, STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. regarding
proposal /recommendation to chanqe Tracy Ave. traffic patterns.
Dear Sirs:
If the city or neighbors insist that a change is neccessa[y and that
proposed figure 9 is basical ly a good plan then I think there should be two
additional changes.
.1. 1 would propose that McGuire Rd be dead ended at
69th street. This would do two things; First it would eliminate the
cut.through temptation for commuters which would certainly incease with
Tracv closed and increased traffic on Antrim and 70th. and Second It would
ensure that Brook and McGuire would not become the new collector streets
or Northern neighborhood traffic going to 70th. I goes the final step in your
ithe engineers) recommendation (page 3 of summary) that the entire
neighborhood be divided diagonally.
2. 1 propose that' we reopen 68th street at Valley view.
with the installation of the traffic divereters the orginal reason for closing
this street (that it was a shortcut to Tracy) will be entirely removed. The
only traffic that could conceivably benefit from turning on 68th street
would be neighborhood traffic. I dont think this would mean a very
'zignifigant increase in traffic to 68th since the only neighbors likely to use
it under plan 9 would be those on the southern end of Galway. It would
Inowever keep Brook and 69th street from becoming the rather unnatural
route for neighbors to take to Antrim /Valley View.
All of the these ideas of course assume as do you (the Consulting
Engineer.) in your report, that 70th and Antrim are the main routes in our
area and that they can and should handle more traffic.
Thanks you for your consideration of my concerns. I am sure you
understand how controversai and difficult it can be for an established
neighborhood to consider these sorts of changes.
Sincerely,
Michael Lil ja, 5809 McGuire Rd., Edina MN 55439
or
5620 W. 66th St.
Edina, Mn. 55439
January 27, 1992
Francis J. Hoffman, P. E.
Director of Public Works
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota, MN., 55424 -1394
Re: Traffic Flow Change in Tracy Avenue Neighborhood
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
We received your letter regarding the proposal for a change in the
traffic flow for our neighborhood.
We have lived on W. 66th Street since November, 1962 and have
seen the area grow. We are opposed to any alteration of our street
system ( especially traffic diverters indicated in Map #9.) One of
our major concerns is that by blocking the streets mentioned in
the proposal is that the response time for the Fire and Rescue Squads
would be reduced significantly to a large area of the neighborhood.
Again, we are strongly opposed to any changes made to the traffic
flow in our neighborhood.
Thank you for your time. We will be attending the City Council
meeting on February 3.
Yours truly,
ic'ee4,1- &le'
Robert & Deborah Danielsen
cc: Fred Richards, Mayor of Edina
5612 Hillside Court
Edina, MN 55439
Jan. 27, 1992
Francis J. Hoffman
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
This is in response to your notice of a potential
traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood between
Tracy Ave. and W. 70th St., the subject of a Feb. 3
review proceeding. Please note the following:
1. The official city map used for this project, and
presumably all other city projects, erroneously
identifies Hillside Court and Hillside Circle. They
are just the opposite from what the city map shows.
Presumably this error has been perpetuated for 25
years, since these houses were built.
Please correct the official city map and notify us
when it is corrected.
2. We are strongly opposed to Pattern D, shown in
Figure 9, and are skeptical about all the alternatives.
Pattern D will effectively cut us off from the rest of
our neighborhood for any vehicular travel. We use these
streets to commute to work, to shop in the Cahill -W.
70th St. area and for other reasonable residential
purposes.
If Pattern D were implemented, we would be forced to
add to the commuter snarl on Crosstown Hwy. 62, and we
would cease to do business in the Cahill -W. 700--ii -at.
area because it would be too inconvenient.
in short, no diversion would be preferable to
Pattern D. We do not have enough information to
comment on the alternative patterns.
Yours truly,
A" 2�
a.
David L. Kuhn Janice A. Kuhn
January 28, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council Members:
We have lived on the corner of Lois Lane and Tracy avenues for the past
18 years. During this time we have seen the traffic on Tracy avenue grow
until it has become both noisy, and menacing to children in the area.
We are unable to attend the Council meeting on February 3, 1992, but we
would like you to know that we support the recommendation made by Strgar-
Roscoe- Faush, Inc.- Traffic Diverters, Pattern D, Exhibit'9.
We do not believe that Tracy avenue was ever meant to be the "main traffic
route" that it is now. We hope that good judgement prevails, and Tracy is
restored to'the residential street it was.
Respectfully,
i
Gayle & Arvy Mack
5701 Lois Lane
Edina, MN 55439
941 -3650
fJ /r14 C-)�
January 28, 1992
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Gentlemen:
This letter is in response to the recent undated
letter and attachments thereto from the city - engineer.
I built the third or fourth house on Lois Lane
in 1963. As you no doubt know, this street is one block
long between Tracy on, the East and Valley View on the
west.
While we were lot hunting, long before we started
to build, we were told by real estate people and other
Edina friends that Tracy was the north -south throughway
.:from Vernon Avenue to 70th St. It was then and always
has been! Certainly Valley View carries a great deal
of through traffic but primarily that with a destination
west and southwest of Valley View. My family may be
an exception in that, coming from or going to the crosstown,
we invariably take Valley View. If we are going east,
however, we always take Tracy.
I am strongly opposed to all of the traffic
diversion plans presented in the above letter.. The one
recommended by the consulting engineers is a repetition
of the tremendous mistake made in southwest Minneapolis
several years ago. Those intersections have probably
received more cussing from motorists and pedestrians
alike than any other "traffic solution" in the Twin Cities.
Please don't repeat those mistakes in Edina!
The people who built or bought along Tracy
Avenue knew what they were getting into at the time.
This is not a recent phenomenon.
The best "solution" to our present situation
is to do absolutely nothing. I hope you reach that conclusion.
r
Yours truly
Robert E. Thompson
5712 Lois Lane
Edina, MN 55439
5720 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
January 27, 1992
Mayor Fred Richards
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mayor Richards:
We object to the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our
neighborhood. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the
neighborhood in two while making it difficult for residents to drive within
their own neighborhood. Plan D that increases traffic on McGuire Rd does not
consider the neighborhood park at the head of the circle where many small,
children play year- round. In addition, the fire department has indicated
that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency
vehicles. This could be a potentially dangerous situation.
We oppose any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. All
of the, proposals would add traffic to existing light traffic streets. Tracy
Avenue has long been the accepted through street for neighbors. People
who have moved into the neighborhood have considered their purchase. We
oppose any change.
Sincerely,
Linda and John Helland
i
5720 McGuire Rd
Edina, MN 55439
January 27, 1992
Francis J. Hoff man, PE
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
We object to the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our
neighborhood. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the
neighborhood in two while making it difficult for residents to drive within
their own neighborhood. Plan D that increases traffic on McGuire Rd does not
consider the neighborhood park at, the head of the circle where many small
children play year- round. In addition, the fire department has indicated
that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency
vehicles. This could be a potentially dangerous situation.
We oppose any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. All
of the proposals would add traffic to existing light traffic streets. Tracy
Avenue has long been the accepted through street for neighbors. People
who have moved into the neighborhood have considered their purchase. We
oppose any change.
Sincerely,
.ki p
Linda and John Helland
i
January _'S. i99'_
Council
Edina
48011 W. 50th St.
Edina. AN 55424
Dear City Council Members:
We are very much opposed to the proposed 1:rafifl.c -!.i,-,rArter
.Lan concerning Tract- Avenue. -.t is also shocking to think how.,
Man'., ",1'.Z1X UOL.Lars %:vnn -.ipenzz- to ,.;.Lan 1.11is 'blockage .r .iiree
;,eerie W110 bought hol;SIOS
ne.:!�nboL%Iood streets Eor so
bilsy stxnet.
i A•acv Avenue nas W
:.,en . a cus! -3rr,-:Aet zuja -.I ma-..n :.ut-
- "i! 1. - - . -t .10US-
n C. li:_, i I for . L d. he!-, :--:iopp,in.- for :L' I T01'
-e, !: .,rreet and L Jead _ is 1- A
:0 7.. iv'r-.L-C.S t:,% Lo wesri price %.d-iich vi :-ion ;:lina
-1. :., . however.- ro .�)ck -i; L t-hn
r a A' " I' Ho - bi A
:,.retLs arouna Ls would nnvo r-housanas of people dri.yir.-,---
'making many more. bush- streets where
o ,%:amD!e 'rooi; and McGuire. Those -people also bough:.
and !.raff.-Lc increased .:ii L-r.ad
were 1r.) Cie installed.
Edina. we are r.roud )Y oilr be a LIT.:;. fI; i tV y ,
road b-i-,cks v e r'%. ZO aer*11". :lot.
a
MA di., -
!.no 'OLInc T. (I
fi c diverter v. ..a. :Ilall!z
Lncoreiy.
Donna and Da vi ❑ TAL11 III
.5000 West i;8th'
Edina. MN
5620 W. 66th St.
Edina, Mn. 55439
January 27, 1992
Francis J. Hoffman, P. E.
Director of Public Works
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota, MN. 55424 -1394
Re: Traffic Flow Change in Tracy Avenue Neighborhood
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
We received your letter regarding the proposal for a change in the
traffic flow for our neighborhood.
We have lived on W. 66th Street since November, 1962 and have
seen the area grow. We are opposed to any alteration of our street
system (especially traffic diverters indicated in Map #9.) One of
our major concerns is that by blocking the. streets mentioned in
the proposal is that the response time for the Fire and Rescue Squads
would be reduced significantly to ' a large area of the neighborhood.
Again, we are .strongly opposed to any changes made to the traffic
flow in our neighborhood. .
Thank you for your time. We will be attending the City Council
meeting on February 3.
Yours truly,
Robert & Deborah Danielsen
cc: Fred Richards, Mayor of Edina
L
_ --_-__-__--_-
- - _-
,
Mayor Fred Richards
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
Dear Mr. Mayor,
I am writing you regarding the Tracy Avenue traffic study conducted by
Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch.
I recently chaired a neighborhood meeting held to discuss this issue.
Approximately 80 residents from the affected area were in attendance.
Several issues were raised and a poll of the attendees was conducted.
I would like to briefly review the issues and results.
On the issue of the installation'of traffic diverters, the attendees
were unanimous. 80 were opposed to any traffic diverters. and 0 were
in favor of them. I believe this is a clear mandate for you and the
City Council.
Among the issues raised were:
- The traffic laws are not adequately enforced. While obeying the 45
mph posted limit, I have been passed twice within the, last few months.
Also, some residents reported that NSP trucks are still using Tracy
Avenue.
- The traffic congestion at Antrim and Valley View is a very dangerous
situation in light. of the conversion of Valley View to a Middle
School this fal 1 .
- When the traffic control lights from westbound 62 to southbound 100
become operational the traffic through the area is likely to increase.
- There is significant support for signage such as true speed limit
signs (25 mph) and "No Through Traffic ", even if compliance 'is not
total.
- The primary concern is for the safety of children going to and from
school.
In summary, the mood of the neighborhood is that there is not a major
problem and that, under no circumstances, should the existing traffic
patterns be altered. Tracy Avenue has the lowest density of housing_
in the area and, therefore, is the logical route for much of the
traffic in the area, a substantial percentage of which originates in
the neighborhood. It should also be noted that any system which
lengthens the distance that local residents must travel to leave the
neighborhood significantly increases traffic levels within that
neighborhood.
Thank you for your consideration of these matters.
Sincerely,
De II Smi th
5613 Brook Drive
Edina, Mn. 55439
941 -6996
THE Mogp, IAND INN
A BENCHMARK O CONFERE E EN ER
�1
/9(? z-
,/,0 i 6uov -4's ,
7025 Northland Drive • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 • (612) 536 -8300
Al`
January 31, 1992
6715 Cahill Road
Edina, MN 55439
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works and Chairman
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear 'Mr. Hoffman:
With reference to the traffic patterns on Tracy Avenue from 66th Street to West 70th Street, I would like
to introduce my comments to the committee. I will be unable to attend the February 3rd meeting because
I will be out of town, but I wanted to give you my input.
As you will note by my address, I am in the area and will be affected by the possible inclusion of
barriers. I am concerned that the barrier proposal will significantly change the traffic pattern of
emergency vehicles into and out of our area. Fire, police, and paramedic or ambulance vehicles would
incur delays if they had to enter the area with the only access being from the south.
Please register my concern with your committee. Thank you in advance for your consideration. I know
that the decision will be made in the best interest of all residents in this area.
Very truly yours,
Robert A. Sandilla
RAS:pla
co _� ' �"~ - �__.OL
January 31, 1992
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works and
Chairman of the Edina Traffic
Safety Committee
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
e
Re: Tracy Avenue
Dear Francis:
With all respect to SRF Consulting Engineers, their selection of
Traffic Diverter Pattern D as a recommendation in the Tracy
Avenue /70th Street neighborhood is not acceptable.
Although the "through traffic" pattern remains a problem, there
must be other considerations and solutions before you disrupt the
majority of the neighborhood.
I suggest you review the following:
1. Enforce the existing laws to keep the NSP, Gabbert and other
trucks from using Tracy from 70th Street to Valley View.
2. Add another stop sign on Tracy.
3. Place a "No Through Traffic" sign at the corner of 70th and
Tracy and another one at Tracy and 66th (the left turn
area).
Most of all, we need heightened enforcement of traffic speeds on
both Tracy and Valley View. It seems that trucks and buses
forget they are in a neighborhood.
Page
THRESHER SQUARE, SUITE 100. PARK AVENUE ATTHIRD STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415. PHONE (612)342 -2890
Page a.
In closing, you could ask the Edina Police to patrol Tracy as
well as Valley View and Antrim from 7 -9am and 4 -6pm. With this
increased police visibility, we should realize a real
improvement.
If you wish to discuss further, please call.
Best regards,
I
' r
Ron Counton
President
PC 0 -4
cc: Mayor Frederick S. Richards
RC:dnm:695
REED OLSON
�'iNDy 01-50A]
b 11-C
CA F+i L L A6
EDiNr�, H /nf 5530
66AM 1(DVALei L
po sE of 77-lis Lk "r iS 7z s; x, rE vu rL
p 0 ooS ri o A< T-b TN-f- TKA-f-F,c D i'v�K �� K - P A-rr6 rcxu
L A Av 6 Ai- 79,4,frie D lVE2-1-t-te- PArrr- K V-S 77.,1,4r
Y A rrt-- 1-" ;S m a E ak 6s�.� r� m 77Y-4
FAiN,+ er i Y COL)Ate4'L- cn! Z - 3 - cl' Z . lXl f-- bo No r
FtF� THAT ANY A[.T-r--,,eA7- 6AI I'S tu0,44RAk)T-9 D , /4-^/d
�SPECr'Au.y AIo-r 774oSE w)14-7 �H 04uSE tFXeEsSiL'&
/ti(00AI t'KNi ENCE 7`U F�iST7�G flCt- (EDu�n/E,� x,,45
(A rW A) D &,4S.
vN 0f TH4 HAIN 96gC01%( S
HONE W As /7-5 C CA)L)6nri eA(r I-064,0 1-7'od Av 6
4 L' -SSA 6i L i r y To Ht 6 fiw,4 -t z.
ANoTHE,e F4CrVZ TD Co/vSi'tlE� i S TY6
;Ivoei-45M gAfodNT 61 77M,6 iT u)ou L-a TA41<:,v-
TI+E
7�v YEA/LS �Go , we A�A13 A I %2E iAl Du O,
14t N E . to(-- 77tE
r 6 tl i �l �rEt� TIfE l/,26 STA-K i kc) 19",6 THEV
I,U�,QE A6�E SAUE 0ufZ #69S6, TN E Y 701,6
U5 -R �u 6 H, THAT H,413 Pfg /W,Ci V46 .1 H i^ A)
-WA-oe- l-OST- OU4 IgCHE , c�F
�E�i E�f Tttt Pieo posm C'�,A�l6ES wou �A AAA
A�r ���SiT A�trovivT bf 7irr� 7a mE P
��U DT*f
GD/11Si�t%Ct� oN %S 7�tf}T TN"E
P,Zo /oSFd PLAN Wou �.►� D�U T T,�A -�Fi oiv� ��oelL
REED OLSON
A) 1-04 9 t-9- To T?fL TR . AO 6 A�76 H 50,1-lool- do f-(,,0c� x
100E4E S7V6kA(V� ACC4 JeRd,14
T f-,ae y A,06� i s A H -4roP- f x,'r OAF 14761-fwi4y
(� Z w� ��c i,Ev�' 7`H6 01'7-7 PI-/A(N ,61t.S ni r�N D E.S
d0l-l- e TD4 SM6X I— 6A) l3o7-lf
No�if+
4,(6 Svv7-74- S;/3-4S Ojq 4koy 62
7" oSc 77f Ar P 1 it C 14A s 4 o/J Tip A--r
sT���i �' ffovc.� �Uo7- r3E Su�oR i sta Tz� Giti/�
T AA r" i T r-0A[CT7'O.4(S 77-f-A7- W AAy .
�F ( AMV GoSo�Q
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council.
Name
i
1 �
Aoa� "a� �
Address
SbD�
C--t
/� v
erl0
/� v
PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY
As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic
study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are
opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long
established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion
within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a
totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and
restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy; Antrim and 70th
Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created
by the Metro Office Park, should be sought'by the Edina City Council.
Name
Address
t/:2-
January 27, 1992
Mr. & Mrs. L. B. Strachan
6617 Galway Drive
Edina, MN 55439
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View
Road and West 70th Street.
Dear City Council:
We have been a resident of Edina for 40 years, having had our
first new house in Edina condemned for the 62nd Street Crosstown
Highway - I built the first House in the Heights in Edina.
When the industrial park was in the early planning stage we
attended many meetings with concerned parents and neighbors about
the traffic thru our area and the safety of our children in and
around Cahill school, brought on by the added traffic from the
then new 62nd Street Crosstown and'the proposed industrial park.
In attending these public meetings with George Hite, then Planning
Department Hegd, and Mr. Tupa of the Planning Commisssion, we were
assured that there would be no access into the residential areas
from the the Industrial Park.
Others have addressed the disapproval of the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch,
Inc. report and I will add my name to that report also. I am
opposed to dividing the neighborhood into bits and pieces.
I recommend block the access between the Industrial area and
Cahill Road. Also, put up a "NO LEFT TURN - 7 TO 9 AM" off Valley
View Road onto West 66th Street, Grace, Lois, and Susan Streets.
Then put a "NO RIGHT TURN SIGN - 4 TO 6 PM" off West 70th Street
at Hillside and Tracy Avenue.
Thank you,
L. B. Strachan
1'
�r `V
VT,.N r1PN• .
a ,
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
Front: CRAIG LARSEN
Date: FEBRUARY 3, "1992
Subject. FINAL PLAT APPROVA
PETER ANDREA 1ST
ADDITION, 6996
VALLEY VIEW ROAD,
S -91 -9.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item ; IV. A.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr e Recommends To HRA
Approval of Final Plat subject to:
Ix To Council
Action ` Motion
X Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
1. Subdivision dedication based on an unimproved land value of
$300,000.
2. Execution and recording of attached Development Agreement.
BACKGROUND /INFO
Preliminary Plat approval was granted for this three lot (2 new)
plat at the December 16, 1991 Council meeting.* The proponents are
now presenting their Final Plat and request its approval.
Lot sizes and dimensions remain the same as those given preliminary
approval..
Attached to this cover are the assessor's report of land value and
the Development Agreement. Similar to the Development Agreement
for Jyland Whitney Addition, the Agreement covers tree removal,
retaining walls, and erosion control protection. Copies of the
Agreement have been sent to George Borer the attorney who
represents Daniel Spiegal, 7104 Valley View Road.
Final Development Plan for Burnet Realty, 5036 France Avenue South, presented at
the regular meeting of the City Council of December 16, 1991, be and is hereby
approved.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Resolution adopted.
(� V PRELINrRaBY FIAT APPROVED FOR PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION (6996 VALLEY VIER ROAD)
,141Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
n� Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen explained that the subject property, located at 6996 Valley View
Road, is a developed single family lot with a lot area of approximately 4.6
acres. Improvements on the property include a house in the central portion of
the property, a swimming pool directly.south of the house, and a tennis court
further south and about 40 feet lower than the ground elevation adjacent to the
house. Access to the existing house is from Shawnee Circle via a driveway over a
40 foot wide outlot.
The proposed subdivision would create two new buildable lots. Lots 1 and 3 would
front on and would have driveway access to the recently completed Bello Drive.
Lot 2 with a reconstructed house would continue to be served with driveway access
to Shawnee Circle.
The 500 foot neighborhood used for evaluation purposes yields a median lot width
of 100 feet, median lot depth of 150 feet, and a median lot area of 16,450 square
feet. The three proposed lots would exceed the median lot width, depth and area:
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3
Lot Width 150 feet 205 feet 120 feet
Lot Depth 205 feet 370 feet 410 feet
Lot Area 38,500 sq. ft. 91,750 sq. ft. 71,830 sq. ft.
Lot 3 would not meet the minimum "lot width to perimeter ratio" of 0.10. Lot 3
has a lot width to perimeter ratio of 0.07. Thus, a variance from this standard
would be required. No new public streets or utilities are anticipated for the
proposed subdivision.
The impact of the development would be caused largely by driveway construction
for Lots 1 and 3. The proposed house on Lot 3 would be constructed on what is
now a tennis court. The new driveway serving this lot would include grades of
108 or more and would require some retaining walls. The proposed pad in Lot 1
would be cut into the hill with a retaining wall to provide a small rear yard.
Although the driveway would be considerably shorter than on Lot 3, it would be
equally steep. No building plans have been submitted for any of the three lots.
Included as part of the proposed preliminary plat would be Outlot A of the
Jyland- Whitney Addition. The outlot has been deeded to the owner of the subject
property and provides for frontage on Bello Drive. Providing frontage on Bello
Drive for the subject property was a condition of approval for Jyland- Whitney
Addition.
Staff would recommend preliminary plat approval with the variance for lot width
to perimeter ratio. The Planning Commission considered the proposed plat at
their meeting of December 4, 1991, and recommended preliminary plat approval
subject to: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) Utility
connection charges, 4) Conservation easements on Lot 1 to maintain a 35 foot
setback from the northerly property line and a 105 foot setback from the
northeastern point of Lot 1.
Presentation by Proponent
Peter Knaeble, Ron Krueger & Associates, Inc, reiterated that the smallest of the
three proposed lots (Lot 1 at .9 acre) is larger than the largest lot in the
Jyland- Whitney Addition. The easements proposed for Lot 1 were based on
conversations between the neighbor to the north and the developer to preserve the
trees on the north side of Lot 1.
Jim Deanovic, proponent, added that they are trying to preserve what Martin Peper
wished, which was to make the least change to the existing landscape.
Public Comment
George Borer, stated that he represented Daniel Spiegel, 7104 Valley View Road,
whose property borders Lot 3 of the proposed subdivision. He referred to the
concerns outlined in the letter he had submitted dated December 16, 1991, and
requested these be included in a development agreement: 1) All retaining walls
and driveways be constructed with approval of the City Engineer in order'to
minimize impact on neighbors, 2) All trees shown on the developer's plan for
preservation be preserved. If disturbed, replacement be done with trees of like
kind and size, 3) No further grading ,be done on the property except as shown on
the plans. Further, location of building pads not be changed from the proposed
plan (Ordinance No. 804, 12 (b)(3) indicates that the location of building pads
must be shown on the plans), and 4) There will be no further lot splits or
subdivisions of the three lots to be created in the proposed plat.
Sidney Rebers, 6916 Dakota Trail, commented that he has no objection to the three
lots as proposed but was concerned that the conservation easement would be able
to handle the drainage from the subdivision because of the terrain.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards observed that this Council could not bind future Councils as to
further subdivision of the plat. He asked the developer if he would consider
entering into a development agreement that would address the concerns raised by
the neighbors. Mr. Deanovic responded that he would have no problem with such an
agreement.
Member Rice spoke to the issue of the proposed location of the building pads.
Planner Larsen indicated that the setbacks required by the conservation easement
would pin down the building pad location for Lot 1. The building pads for Lots 2
and 3 as shown on the plan are the typical and logical locations.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to the following conditions: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication,
3) Utility connection charges, 4) Conservation easement on Lot 1 to maintain 35
foot setback from northerly property line and 105 foot setback from the
northeasterly corner of Lot 1, and 5) Developer's agreement:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELMMqARY PLAT FOR
PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION ". platted by Claire Peper,
single owner. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
December 16, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NOS. 1171, 1366
AND 1466 (cALIZAI ) Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member
Smith for adoption of the following resolution:
Subdivision No.� ' 7/
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality
Commission
FROM: Planning Department
1
�L°
1
1 fit'�"►'r'e�
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE: L/
LAND VALUE:
(By:
i-
/�J/ Date: ✓�S 1/ )
The developer of this subdivision has
been required to
A. grant an easement
over part of the land
QB. dedicate
V of
the land
donate $
as a fee in lieu
of land
As a result of applying the
following
policy:
A. Land Required (no
density or intensity may be
used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be 'a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
II1. In all other instances than above.
2.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............................. If ................. ............. .........
IIIIIIII IM 11111111111 HII
is if I if I I; Ii. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii l!
N 1'04' E
S. 4Z
No/ Ig Z'
04
J Z 388.07
.
.4; LU
�7
wl
0
17 A—
V44
47
Al
IN
K
N
A-
Z
'34
V7
X00 r
ALC
I "
" ,
, I P
PRELIMINARY PLAT- GRADIAJ4pL R
U11; I I v
I"
fill
C
gi
40
Z.
ME
I "
" ,
, I P
PRELIMINARY PLAT- GRADIAJ4pL R
DEVELOPMENT ACRPRMPNT
(Peter Andrea Addition)
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of .1991, between the City
of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "), and
(herein called the "Developer ").
Witnesseth, that:
Whereas, the Developer is the owner of land within the City - legally
described as Lot 1, Block 1, Muir Woods, Outlot 11 Overholt Hills Georgia Addition
and Outlot A jyland Whitney Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Subject Lot"), and has made application to the
City for approval of a plat of the Subject Lot, said plat to be known as Peter Andrea
1st Addition (the "Plat"); and
, Whereas, the City Council granted approval of the Plat, on the
condition, among others, that the Developer enter into this Agreement with the
City relating to the development of the lots (the "Plat Lots ") within the Plat; and
Whereas, the parties hereto acknowledge and agree that development
of the Plat Lots pursuant to this Agreement, and the fulfillment generally of this
Agreement, are in the best interests of the City and the health, safety and welfare of
its residents, and in accord with the purposes, provisions and requirements of the
applicable state and local laws under which the development of the Plat will be
undertaken and completed.
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises and the covenants
and agreements herein contained, the City and Developer hereby agree as follows:
1. Street and Retaining Walls. All retaining walls and driveways shall
be constructed of such materials and pursuant to such plans and specifications as the
City Engineer shall approve in writing prior to construction. Once constructed the
then owner or owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat Lot Owners ") shall maintain in
good condition and repair such portions of such retaining walls as are on the Plat
Lot of such Plat Lot Owners so that such retaining walls are not a hazard.
2. Tree Removal. Developer and all owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat
Lot Owners ") agree to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 823 of the City
relating to the cutting down or removal of trees, in connection with the
development of the Plat Lots.
3., Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Developer and all Plat Lot
Owners agree to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 817 of the City in
connection with the development of the Plat Lots, including, without limitation,
-V0a 8'IdN- 1L3NJLXHA& 1L38M0Gx 7nia 9 0:is0 Z6 *LZ *TO
the placing or installation and maintenance of erosion control fences and hay bales
as required by said ordinance.
4. Remedies.
(a) If Developer, or any Plat Lot Owner, fails to perform any duty
or obligation to be by Developer or such Plat Lot Owner performed
under and pursuant to this Agreement and does not cure any such
failure of performance within thirty (30) days after written notice
thereof is given by the City, then the City, at its option, may enter upon
the property within the Plat, including any Plat Lot, and any part of any
thereof, with such personnel, equipment and materials as the City
deems necessary for the purpose of performing such duty or obligation.
The City, and its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives
and contractors shall have no obligation or liability to Developer or any
Plat Lot Owner or any occupant of the property within the Plat,
including any Plat Lot,'or any part of any thereof, for trespass or
damage to the property within the Plat, including any Plat Lot, or any
part of any thereof, or any improvements thereon, or for loss of
,business or business interruption or any other cause, all of which
liability and obligation is hereby waived by Developer, and each Plat
Lot Owner, and if any person makes any claim against City, or its
respective officers, agents, employees, representatives or contractors for
lose or damage to property or business due to such entry, Developer,
and such Plat Lot Owners agree to hold the City, and its respective
officers, agents, employees, representatives and contractors harmless
from and indemnified against any loss, cost, damage or expense,
including attorneys' fees whether suit be brought or not, arising out of
such claim, and to pay to City, upon demand of the City, any such loss,
cost, damage or expense, including attorneys' fees, suffered or incurred
by the City, or its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives
or contractors, with interest at the highest rate then allowed by law, or,
if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of 129 per annum
from the date demanded until paid; provided, however, that the
foregoing hold harmless and indemnity shall not apply to intentional
wrongful acts or omissions, or negligence, of the City, or its respective
officers, agents, employees, representatives or contractors.
(b) The City, in addition to the remedy at (a) above, shall also
have in the event of such failure, the right to revoke or deny issuance
of any permits then issued or to be issued for any improvements or
development on or of the Plat or any Plat Lot, and shall also have
available all other remedies then allowed at law or in equity, or
provided by ordinance, or provided by the Developer's Agreement,
2
Sod S'IdLq— .&SN.LIHM &SSM00* pgcl 90 fi0 Z6 'LZ 'TO
including the right of the City to realize upon any security given to City
in connection with the Developer's Agreement, and mandatory
injunction, to enforce any of the obligations and duties of Developer or
any Plat Lot Owner hereunder or to recover damages for default
therein.
(c) All of the remedies available to City shall be usable and
enforceable separately or concurrently, and the use of one remedy shall
not waive or preclude the use of one or more of any other remedies.
Also, the failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any remedy shall not
preclude City from thereafter exercising any of its remedies for the
same or a subsequent failure or refusal. Meveloper, and each Plat Lot
Owner, agrees to pay to the City, any and all costs and expenses
incurred by the City in enforcing this Agreement, including attorneys'
fees, whether suit be brought or not, by use of the remedies set out
herein or by other remedy or means available at law or in equity and
with interest on all such costs and expenses at the highest.rate then
allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of
twelve percent (12%) per annum from the dates incurred until paid.
(d) Developer also agrees to pay all costs incurred by the City for
collection of any monies, including interest, due from Developer, or
any Plat Lot Owner, to City pursuant hereto, again including attorneys'
fees and whether suit be brought or,not, with interest at the highest
rate then allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at
the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum on such costs of collection
from the dates incurred until paid.
I Notice. Any notice, report or demand required or permitted to be
given by any party hereof upon or to any other party hereto shall be in writing and
shall be deemed given in accordance with this Agreement when delivered
personally to any officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when
deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, sent by registered or.
certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following
addresses:
If to Developer:
3
90d SZd34- A3H.LIHA& A33H0Q�
MCI 90 : i7O Z6 'LZ *TO
If to City: City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attn: City Manager
If to a Plat Lot Owner:
at the then address of the Plat .Lot.
Notices shall be effective upon personal delivery, or if mailed, one business day after
mailing or depositing in the above manner. Any party may change its address for
the service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in
the manner above specified, ten days prior to the effective date of such change.
6. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by, and only by, a
written agreement executed by the Developer and by the City.
7. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is for any reason
held to be invalid or unenforceable as to. any person or circumstance, the application
of such provision to persons and circumstances other than these as to which it shall
be held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and all provisions of
this Agreement in all other respects shall remain in full force and effect and be valid
and enforceable.
8. Run With Title: Successors and Assign�Ioint and Several Liability.
The provisions hereof shall run with the property within the Plat and with every
Plat Lot and every part of any thereof without regard to technical classification and
designation, legal or otherwise, and will be binding upon, to the fullest extent
permitted by law and in equity, and shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable
by and against, the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns, and all
present and future owners of the property within the Plat and of every Plat Lot, and
every part of any thereof. The obligations of any Plat Lot Owners hereunder (if there
be more, then one such owner of a lot) shall be joint and several. .
9. Limited .Liability. Each person who is now or hereafter a record
owner of all or any part of a Plat Lot shall be liable hereunder for all liabilities and
obligations accruing hereunder with respect to the Plat Lot so owned while such a
record owner of such Plat Lot, and if there be more .than one such record owner,
such owners shall be jointly and severally liable. However, such liability shall cease
as to such record owner when no longer such a record owner, except, however, for
liabilities and obligations which accrued while such a record owner. The rights and
remedies of City under paragraph 4 hereof may be exercised against any Plat Lot
Owners only for failure by those Plat Lot ,Owners, and the failure of the Plat Lot
Owners of one Plat Lot shall not allow exercise of any remedies by the City under
paragraph 4 hereof against the Plat Lot Owners of a different Plat Lot. However, the
foregoing provisions shall not prevent exercise of any remedy in paragraph 4 hereof
4
LOd 8'7dH- 1LZN.L3HM A3SU0G* mid 90 : V0 Ze 'LZ 'TO
as to the then record owners of the land within the Plat, or of any Plat Lot, for a
failure of a then prior record owner of all or any part of the land within the Plat or
of that Plat Lot.
10. Upon recording of a specific release of this instrument signed by the
Mayor and Manger of the City, this instrument will be deemed terminated, satisfied
and released.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
instrument to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written.
By
Its
CITY OF EDINA
By
And
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF
Mayor
Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
If 1991, by a
on behalf of the
Notary Public
L�
9 0a S1Iazq— A3X.L1HA& JL3SH0G* rata 90 : V0 Z6 *LZ IT 0
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1992, by Frederick S. Richards and Kenneth E. Rosland, the Mayor
and Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation,
on behalf of the corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
DORSEY & WHITNEY (JPG)
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
F4
Notary Public
BOd 3ZdDq- A3H.LIHA& 1L3SMOQ* yqa 9 0: -V O Z6 *LE 'TO
polov z ffm I nizill :0�P1 •
The undersigned, being the holder of a (the
"Interest ") on the property within the Plat as defined in the Development
Agreement to which this Consent and Subordination is attached, the document
creating said Interest being dated . and recorded as Document
No. , in the office of the , Hennepin County, Minnesota,
does hereby agree and consent to all of the terms and conditions of the
Development Agreement to which this Consent and Subordination is attached, and
agrees to be bound by all of the obligations of, and subject to all of the remedies
available against, an owner in the event it becomes a record owner of all or any part
of the land within the Plat or of any Plat Lot (as defined in the Development
Agreement).
STATE OF )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing Consent and Subordination was acknowledged before
me this day of .19---, by . the
and , the of
a corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
STATE OF )
se.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing Consent and Subordination was acknowledged before
me this day of .19_, by
7
0 T d 81IdP1- Wi3"x1 HA& AzzmcQ* Wa so : fiVo Ze 'LZ 'T 0
CITY OF EDINA
By
Mayor
And
Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1991, by a
on behalf of the
Notary Public
5
9 0a 8'Id1q— .&3H.LEHM &3SmOQ* rota 8 9:EO Z6 'LZ 't0
December 16, 1991
The Honorable Mayor
and City Council Members
of the City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina MN
RE: Preliminary Plat Approval
Peter Andrea First Addition
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Our firm represents Mr. Daniel J. Spiegel relative to the
proposed plat of Peter Andrea First Addition. Mr. Spiegel is a
neighbor to this proposed plat and has several concerns
regarding the development.
As you are aware, the City Council previously approved a
plat adjacent to this one named Jyland - Whitney Addition. This
plat had a significant impact on the neighborhood because of the
loss of trees and dramatic grading changes. My client would
like to avoid a similar development which completely changes the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood.
Specifically, as required
we are requesting that the City
agreement with the developer of
the following items be included
by Edina City
enter into a
this plat.
Ordinance No. 804,
development
We are requesting
in such an agreement:
1. All retaining walls and driveways will be constructed
with specific approval of the Edina City Engineer in
order to minimize impact on neighbors. We would
request that the width, grading, and location of the
driveways all be approved in order to minimize such
impact.
Sweeney & Borer
Professional Association
Attorneys at Law
Thomas M. Sweeney
Suite 1200 Telephone
George F. Borer
Capital Centre (612) 22 -2541
Paul T. Ostrow
Douglas B. Maslow
Facsimile
386 North Wabasha Street (612) 223 -5289
Patrick J. Sweeney
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
December 16, 1991
The Honorable Mayor
and City Council Members
of the City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina MN
RE: Preliminary Plat Approval
Peter Andrea First Addition
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Our firm represents Mr. Daniel J. Spiegel relative to the
proposed plat of Peter Andrea First Addition. Mr. Spiegel is a
neighbor to this proposed plat and has several concerns
regarding the development.
As you are aware, the City Council previously approved a
plat adjacent to this one named Jyland - Whitney Addition. This
plat had a significant impact on the neighborhood because of the
loss of trees and dramatic grading changes. My client would
like to avoid a similar development which completely changes the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood.
Specifically, as required
we are requesting that the City
agreement with the developer of
the following items be included
by Edina City
enter into a
this plat.
Ordinance No. 804,
development
We are requesting
in such an agreement:
1. All retaining walls and driveways will be constructed
with specific approval of the Edina City Engineer in
order to minimize impact on neighbors. We would
request that the width, grading, and location of the
driveways all be approved in order to minimize such
impact.
The Honorable Mayor
and City Council Members
December 16, 1991
Page Two
2. All trees which are shown on developers plan for
preservation shall be preserved and shall not be
disturbed by the development. If the trees are
disturbed, replacement trees of like kind and size and
landscaping should be done to replace the disturbed
area.
3. No other grading will be done to the property except
as shown on the plans. Further, location of building
pads will not change from the proposed plan without
the prior approval of the City Council. As the City
knows, Ordinance 804, Section 12(b)(3) indicates that
the location of building pads must be shown in the
plans.
4. There will be no further lot splits or subdivisions of
the three lots to be created in the proposed plat.
We believe that entering into this development agreement
will help to minimize impact on the neighborhood and avoid
disputes in the future. , It would also appear reasonable to
request these restrictions since the plat is going to be
utilizing previously undevelopable land. Because of the
topography and the general conditions of this neighborhood,
specific conditions should be imposed to preserve its
integrity.
Thank you for your consideration to this matter.
very truly yours,
& BORER
GFB:vlp
cc: Daniel J. Spiegel
4 FEB -03 -1992 11:20 FROM SWEENEY 8 BORER TO 9277645 P.02i05
Thomas M. Sweeney
George F. Borer
Paul T. Ostrow
Douglas S. Maslow
Patrick J. Sweeney
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. Craig Larson
City Planner
City of Edina
4801 west 50th Street
Edina, MN 55434
AIL , P
Sweeney, Borer & Ostrow
Pmfissiond Association
Attorneys at Law
Suite 1200 Telephone
Capital Centre (612) M-2641
386 North Wabasha Street (612) 228.5289
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
February 3, 1992
Re: Peter Andrea First Addition
Our File No. 7106
Dear Mr. Larson:
Thank you for telefaxing the proposed Development Agreement
on Peter Andrea Addition to me last week. I reviewed the
Agreement and made some changes in it which I believe were more
in the line of Councilmember Kelly's motion for approval. The
changes I have made are as follows:
1. I have included an additional "Whereas" paragraph
discussing the unique characteristics of the subject property.
2. I have significantly expanded the provisions of
Paragraph 1 to include building pad sites and also to include a
basis for the City Engineer's approval or alteration of the
plans and specifications for the project. Since the building
pad sites, tree location, drainage, etc. are all required to be
included in the plat approval process by City Ordinance No. 804,
I thought all of these things should be reviewed by the City
Engineer in conjunction with the construction.
3. 1 have made minor alterations to Paragraphs 2 and 3 to
incorporate the approval of the plans and specifications by the
City Engineer.
4. Finally, I have altered Paragraph 10 to reflect the
continuing obligation of the Plat Lot Owners to maintain
driveways and retaining wails.
FEB -03 -1992 11:20 FROM SWEENEY & BORER TO 9277645 P.03i05
p
Mr. Craig Larson
February 3,, 1992
Page Two
I again wish to thank you for your continued cooperation in
this matter. I look forward to seeing you tonight at the .
Council Meeting.
Very truly yours,
SWEENEY, BORER & OSTROw
Geor e�
g F. Borer
GFB:gc
Enclosure
cc: Daniel J. Spiegel
cc: Jane'Kuhar
FEB -03 -1992 11:21 FROM SWEENEY 8 BORER TO
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TERMS TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(PETER ANDREA ADDITION)
9277645 P.04i05
whereas, the Subject Lot is a unique parcel of property
which, because of its grade and other special characteristics,
requires some special development considerations; and
1. Rai ding Pads. Drivew vs and Ret ining Walls. All
building pads, retaining walls and driveways shall be
constructed of such materials and pursuant to such plans and
specifications as the City Engineer shall approve in writing
prior to construction. The plans and specifications shall
include the location of building pads and the height, width,
location and construction material of the driveways and
retaining walls. The plans and specifications shall also
include the grading, drainage effect and tree removal to be done
in conjunction with the construction. The City Engineer in
approving the plans and specifications shall consider the impact
of the construction on adjacent land (including other Plat Lots)
and shall have the opportunity and the obligation to alter the
plans and specifications in order to minimize any adverse effect
caused by the proposed construction. In making this
determination the City Engineer shall consider aesthetics,
drainage effect, preservation of trees, location of improvement
to lot lines, and the character and symmetry of the
neighborhood. Any alterations in the plans and specifications
by the City Engineer shall be in his sole discretion, and the
Developer and any owner or owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat
Lot Owners ") waive any right to challenge such determination.
In approving or altering the plans and specifications the
Engineer may consult with owners of adjacent land (including
Plat Lot Owners) or other professionals. Once constructed, the
Plat Lot Owners shall maintain in good condition and repair such
portions of the driveways and retaining walls as are on the Plat
Lot of such Plat Lot Owners so that such driveways and retaining,
walls are not a hazard or an adverse effect to adjoining land.
2. Tree_ Removal. Developer and all Plat Lot Owners agree
to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 823 of the City
relating to the cutting down or removal of trees, in connection
with the development of the Plat Lots. Removal of trees in
conjunction with the construction of building pads, driveways
and retaining walls shall be done in accordance with the plans
and specifications referred to in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement
and also with the prior written approval of the City Engineer.
-1-
FEB -03 -1992 11:21 FROM SWEENEY & BORER TO 9277645 P.05i05
3. Erosion nd Sedimentation Control. Developer and all
Plat Lot owners agree to comply with the provisions of ordinance
No. 817 of the City in connection with the development of the
Plat Lots, including, without limitation, the placing or
installation and maintenance of erosion control fences and hay
bales as required by said ordinance. Grading and erosion
control plans shall also be included in the plans and
specifications referred to in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement
which shall also require the prior written approval of the City
Engineer.
lo. Release of Agreement. This Agreement shall not be
released on any Plat Lot until plans and specifications have
been approved by the City Engineer in accordance with the
provisions of Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 herein, and construction is
substantially complete on the building pad, driveway and
retaining wall on such Plat Lot. Upon the recording of a
specific Release of this Agreement signed by the Mayor and
Manager of the City, this Agreement will be deemed terminated,
satisfied and released, except for the continuing obligation of
the Plat Lot Owners to maintain the driveways and retaining
walls as specified in Paragraph 1, herein.
-2-
o�te
iy REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
\�bRPGFLP. •
lose
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: FRANCIS HOFFMAN
CITY ENGINEER'
Date: FEBRUARY 3, 1992,
Subject:
ALLEY VACATION,
PARKING /VEHICLES
54th & YORK AVENUE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # °-
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
E
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Continue alley vacation on 54th Street and York Avenue
indefinitely.
Info /Background:
The City Council on December 16, 1991, held a hearing on
road improvements on York Avenue in the vicinity of West
54th Street. The Council action was to not approve any
projects but require the neighbors to remove abandoned
vehicles and park operating vehicles on their own property,
not in the public right of way. The Police Department has
occasionally monitored the situation and the neighbors
appear to be in compliance with the parking issues.
Second, the neighbors are working on the alley vacation
issue but have not completed any documents for private
cross -use easements as yet. Craig Larsen and Fran Hoffman
have been working with Gary Holman on the issue. The
original requestor of the alley vacation has requested that
the issue be continued indefinitely pending neighborhood
resolution of the alley issue.
(over)
�a..i,
744
C4
r-1,::P, V
C- C- S
15, J`� N S�A-1 g
-3 3 ;�- - I (--� �'j
one
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
�^�vn•rroswt�
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
VI.A•
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: JANUARY 30, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2
a
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
'
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 142 -A2 to increase amount of bond.
Info /Background
At its meeting of January 21, 1992 the.Council gave First Reading to Ordinance
No. 142 -A2. This item has been placed on the Council Agenda for February 3
for Second Reading and adoption.
(over)
ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142
TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"Sec: 3. Bonds. Unless exempt by state. law, every applicant for (i) a
license registration for the carrying on within the City of the business
of plumbing, water softener installing, well drilling or building
moving, or (ii) a license pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 429, Part 1 (Oil
Burner Installer), 429, Part 2 (Stoker Installer), 429, Part 3 (Steam
and Hot Water Heating Installer), 429, Part 4 (Warm Air Heating and Air
Conditioning Installer), 429, Part 5 (Refrigeration Installer), 431,
Part 4 (Gas Fitter) and 1302 (Scavenger) shall file with such
application a bond that is valid and in force and effect in the penal
sum of at least $5,000.00, with a corporate surety approved by the City
Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all
material and equipment furnished, and as to all business carried on or
all work done, commenced or performed during,the term of the license,
license registration or renewal thereof shall:"
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon passage and publication.
First Reading: January 21, 1992
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
22 -2
Mayor
ch REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and City Council
FROM: Bob Ko j e t in
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: January 27, 1992
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Fairway Aerator
Company
1. Cushman Motor Company, Inc.
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Cushman Motor Company, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM VIII-A.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1, $17,368.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
Only one company submitted a:.bid for this aerator. This is a new
piece of equipment for aerating of the fairways. It replaces an
old pull type aerator.
The Recommended bid is
Department
x
within budget not within
Kenneth Rosland City
Wallij, Finance Director
913A. Aj
° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
� '
rJ.� •a .
TO: Mayor Richards and City Council
FROM: Bob Ko j et in
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: January 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM VIII-B--
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 16 ft. Tractor Rotary Mower
Company
1. MTI Distributing Co. $52,203 with 1971 seven 1.
2, gang mower trade -in
Long Lake Ford Tractor Inc. 2•
3. North Star Turf, Inc. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
MTI Distributing Co.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$48,203.00
No Bid
No Bid
Two other companies submitted paperwork but did not bid.
A new 16 foot rotary mower replacing a 1971 seven gang reel
mower. This is a change, a new technology in mowing whereas
a higher grass can be mowed with the same quality as a reel
mower which has difficulty mowing a higher grass during the
late spring and early summer. Has a big advantage in cheaper
maintenance in sharpening of the blades instead of the old
reel mowers that took mj�.qy hours to sharpen.
ure Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within budoei
Kenneth
Wallin, FinVice Director
City Mana
.1.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE 1/30/92
AGENDA ITEM VIII.0
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sandpro rake to
rake sand
traps
at Golf Course.
Company
Amount of Quote or &d
cost
trade -in
1.. MTI Distributing Company $8,469
$2,000
1.
$6,469
2. Wayzata Lawn Mower. $8,503
$1,000
2.
$7,503
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
MTI Distributing Company $6,469
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Trade in of the 1984 Sand Pro (Serial Number 08880 - 40537). Purchase
of a new 14 HP Sand Pro Rake.
0
The Recommended bid is
within budget no
Kenneth Rosland City
k 9%. . .0p
° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM; Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works - -y
/j
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE February 3, 1992 AGENDA ITEM VIII . D .
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
1. Midwest Machinery
2. Ziegler Inc.
3. Midwest Machinery
4.
5.
One Used Grader
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Amount of Quote or &d
$69,900.00
$74,500.00
$76,400.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: Midwest Machinery $76,400
GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a motor grader purchase replacing
unit #25.403, 1966 model. This purchase was a bid for a good quality, low
use, used motor grader. We received three bids from two firms for used
equipment. We evaluated the machines in terms of hours used to date,
mechanical condition, test driving, and warranty of machines. After full
review, the lowest true bid is the second Midwest Machinery bid, a 1989
model 672B John Deere Grader. See attached memorandum. This purchase
is funded by the equipment replacement fund.
' natured'
The Recommended bid is
within budget
Public Works - Streets
Dep n
not wit ' bu ii Kohn Wallin, Finance Director
i /7
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 29, 1991
TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer & Director of Public Works
FROM: Steve Johnson, Purchasing
SUBJECT: AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ONE USED MOTOR GRADER
On December 26, 1991, bids were opened for one used motor grader,
1986 or newer. Three .bids were received'for.used machines:
Ziegler Inc. $79,000 - $4,500 trade = $74,500
Midwest Machinery $71,900 - $2,000 trade = $69,900
Midwest Machinery $78,400 - $2,000 trade = $76,400
A comparison of machines is as follows:
The reason we are bidding a used machine is because of the price
of new equipment. The three machines bid as new equipment would
range in price from $98,000 to $130,000. We feel there is a
substantial savings to the City by securing a good solid used
machine.
For comparison purposes, to determine the best value for the City
of Edina, we would use 'a $16 per hour owning and.operating cost
which is an industry wide documented figure. From this $16 cost
we would take out the cost for fuel, tires, grease and oil, and
repair costs. These costs are about one half of the $16 cost,
leaving us $8 per hour as a "to own" cost.
Applying this $8 figure to our three bids works out as follows
according to hours and condition of machine.
The bid from Ziegler for a 1986 machine with 2832 hours for
$74,500 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 2832 hours = $22,656
of additional cost. This owning cost plus bid equals $97,156 and
eliminates this bid as the low responsive bid.
Year
Mdl
Hours
Warranty
Tires
Ziegler Inc.
1986
120G
2832
6 mos
fair
Midwest Machinery
1990
670B
1700
6 mos
fair
Midwest Machinery
1989
672B
875
18 mos
new
The reason we are bidding a used machine is because of the price
of new equipment. The three machines bid as new equipment would
range in price from $98,000 to $130,000. We feel there is a
substantial savings to the City by securing a good solid used
machine.
For comparison purposes, to determine the best value for the City
of Edina, we would use 'a $16 per hour owning and.operating cost
which is an industry wide documented figure. From this $16 cost
we would take out the cost for fuel, tires, grease and oil, and
repair costs. These costs are about one half of the $16 cost,
leaving us $8 per hour as a "to own" cost.
Applying this $8 figure to our three bids works out as follows
according to hours and condition of machine.
The bid from Ziegler for a 1986 machine with 2832 hours for
$74,500 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 2832 hours = $22,656
of additional cost. This owning cost plus bid equals $97,156 and
eliminates this bid as the low responsive bid.
1�.
Midwest Machinery bid two machines, one a 1990 machine with 1700
hours for $639,900 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 1700 hours =
$13,600 of additional.cost. This owning cost plus bid equals
$83,500.
Midwest Machinery's second bid was for a 1989
hours for $76,400 plus owning costs of $8 per
$7,000 of additional cost. Thi's owning cost
$83,400. This machine has the remainder of a
months vs 63,months). A one year warranty, if
other machines is $1950 plus option.
machine with 875
hour x 875 hours plus b i d equals
2 year warranty (18
purchased, on the
If we add the extended one year warranty of $1950 to the 1990
machine our total would be $85,450.
Therefore, we are recommending, as the best value for the City of
Edina, the bid from Midwest Machinery for the 1989 machine with
875 hours and the automatic one year extended warranty.
1;Sa. At
° N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE- 3 February, 1992
AGENDA ITEM VIII . E .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Paint:
220 Gal. White,
770
Gal. Yellow
Company
Amount of Quote or Ed
1.
Linear Dynamics, Inc.
1.
$
6,332.70
2.
Sherwin Williams
2.
$
6,781.50
3.
Diamond Vogel Paints
3.
$
7,527.30
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Linear Dynamics, Inc.
$ 6,332.70
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is an annual purchase for traffic paint for our City streets
and crosswalks. This purchase is thru the general operating budget
at Public Works.
Public Works Streets
Signature Dep nt
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within mdge %ohn YV01in, Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
1 - -A
of
'J
+a
REFORTIREC OMMENDAT10N
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Agenda Item — IX. A.
Consent
Information Only
Date: February 3, 1992
Mgr. Recommends ! i To HRA
Subject: Tax Forfeit Land �i x! To Council
on Vernon Court
Action 771 Motion
i
X Resolution
' ! Ordinance
�! Discussion
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Council approve sale of land at public auction.
BACKGROUND /INFO
Following the July 21, 1992, Council meeting staff sent the
attached letter to 93 homeowners in the Viking Hills neighborhood
and on Gleason Court. The letter asks whether the neighbors have
an interest in acquiring the land by paying off the special
assessments levied against the property.
Twenty -three (23) or 25 percent returned the survey. None of the
property owners who returned the survey had an interest in
acquiring the property.
over
January 24, 1992
Dear Viking Hills or Gleason Court Resident:
Re: Vernon Court Property (See Reverse). This does not include the 1 acre lot at the east end
of Vernon Court.
The subject property is in the process of being forfeited to the State for unpaid taxes. If
the property is indeed forfeited it would be resold at a public auction. Prior to tax forfeiture sale
the City is given the opportunity to acquire the land for public purposes. Public purposes include
parks, open space, streets, roads, etc.
The purpose of this letter is to see if you and your neighbors are interested in acquiring
the subject property to add to the open space provided by Krahl Hill. If the City were to acquire
the property, the cost would be approximately $157,000 to cover special assessments currently
levied against this property. The City would look to your neighborhood to cover this cost. You
may recall that the Viking Hills neighborhood helped purchase Krahl Hill for open space.
This notice is being sent to 93 property owners in Viking Hills and on Gleason Court.
If all property owners shared equally in the cost, each share would be about $1,700.00. The City
Council would like to know if you would be interested in acquiring the property and if you
would be willing to pay the estimated cost. This would be a voluntary purchase by the
neighborhood, it would not be an assessment against your property.
You can express your views by attending the City Council meeting on February 3,. 1992
or by returning the bottom portion of this letter in the enclosed post paid envelope prior to the
meeting.
Si erely, L&W,
(JA,J raig Larsen
City Planner
CLljh
Please fill out below, sign, and return in enclosed postpaid envelope
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
YES I would be willing to contribute towards the acquisition of this property.
NO, I am not interested in contributing towards acquisition of this property .
Name: Address.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM IX.B
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRED RICHARDS, MAYOR
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992
I am recommending appointment of the following individuals whose terms expire
on February 1:
Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1/95)
Arthur Dickey, Susan Kelm, DeLores Paul
Board of Appeals and Adjustments (3 year term to 2/1/95)
Donald Patton
Building Construction Appeals Board (3 year term to 2/1/95)
Quentin Collins, Eugene Palmer
Community Development and Planning Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95)
David Byron, Robert Hale, Gordon Johnson
One appointment pending.
Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/94)
David Rosenblatt, Sally Tang
Two more appointments needed - current members cannot continue to serve.
(consumers or one consumer /one provider)
Edina Park Board (3 year term to 2/1/95)
James Fee, Andrew Herring, William Lord
Edina Recycling Commission (2 year term to 2/1/94)
William Brauer, Jr., Ardythe Buerosse, Robert Reid
Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/94)
Marilyn Curtis, Garold Nyberg
One more appointment needed - current member cannot continue to serve.
Human Relations Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95)
Nancy Atchison (S), John Crist (C), Phyllis Kohler (S)
(School Board approved reappointment of both Atchison and Kohler.)
One appointment pending (Council).
One vacancy (Rifley unexpired term to 2/1/94).
13A.
qLe A
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor Richards
Agenda item #
From:
an d Council Members
Consent
❑
Bob Kojetin, Director
Information Only
❑
Date:
Park and Recreation Dept.
Mgr . Recommends
El
To HRA
Subject:
January 31, 1992
0
To Council
Action
[2
Motion
Appointment of
Assistant Weed Inspector
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Recommend Lowell McCarthy as the Assistant Weed Inspector, 1992.
Info/Background-
Lowell McCarthy has worked with the Edina Park and Recreation Department for the past 25
years. Last year Mr. McCarthy, worked as an assistant to the Assistant Weed Inspector,
Eugene Davis. During that time he became familiar with the rules and. regulations regarding
weed ordinances. He also attended clinics on nuisance and weed ordinances.
U
.. R
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND , MANAGER
Agenda Item #
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: JANUARY 30, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: CHANGE OF POLLING PLACE
Y
To Council
PRECINCT NO. 16 & 13
Action
❑
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: Adoption by the Council of the following resolution:
RRQl1T UTTOM
BE IT RESOLVED by'the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that the
polling place for Precinct No. 16 be changed to Cornelia School, 7000 Cornelia
Drive;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the polling place for Precinct No. 13 be changed
to Centennial Lakes Park Centrum, 7499 France Avenue South.
Info /Background
Precinct No. 16 has been voting at the Southdale Hennepin Area Library. I have
been notified by the Hennepin County Library Administrative Offices that the
Southdale Library meeting room will close on February 1, 1992 because of the
building renovation project and will not be available for voting in 1992, 1993
and part of 1994.
I am proposing to move Precinct No. 16 to Cornelia School and to move Precinct
No. 13, which now votes at Cornelia School, to Centennial Lakes Park Centrum. Both
these locations would comply with election law which permits polling locations
to be located up to 3000 feet outside of the precinct boundary if no suitable
location is available within the precinct.
(The attached map reflects the proposed changes.)
e.
I -
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
8
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4204 - 420 -42
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4504 - 420 -42
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034701
01/22/92
43.75
HENN CTY SHERIFF
EQUIP MAINT
27- 2010 - 000 -00
43.75 *
27- 2010 - 000 -00
034702
01/22/92
1,812.50
HENN CTY TREAS
PRINTING
50- 2010 - 000 -00
1,812.50 *
50- 2010 - 000 -00
034703
01/22/92
147.50
CRIME CONTROL DIGEST
DUES
401624 8051
10- 4620- 560 -56
147.50 *
10- 4266- 420 -42
034704
01/22/92
31.95
MIKE SIITARI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31.95 *
034705
01/22/92
10.00
MN DEPT OF
LICENSE
10.00 *
034706
01/22/92
151.94
BOB BRAMWELL
MILEAGE
151.94 *
034707
01/22/92
68,618.00
MIRCLE REC EQUIP
WATER SLIDE
68,618.00 *
034708
01/22/92
11.00
RICHARD B MYRE
LICENSE
11.00 *
034709
01/22/92
80.00
MN URBAN TRAFFIC
REGISTRATION
80.00 *
034710
01/28/92
2,656.00
LUIS HERNANDEZ
SERVICES
034710
01/22/92
2,608.00
LUIS HERNANDEZ
SERVICES
034710
01/22/92
2,608.00-
LUIS HERNANDEZ
SERVICES
034710
01/22/92
2,608.00
LUIS HERNANDEZ
SERVICES
034710
01/28/92
2,608.00-
LUIS HERNANDEZ
REFEREE
2,656.00 *
034711
01/22/92
152.00
FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME
MIX
034711
01/27/92
192.00
FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME
MIX
034711
01/22/92
84.00
FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME
MIX
428.00 *
034712
01/24/92
225.00
SCOTT THOMPSON
REIMBURSEMENT
225.00 *
034713
01/22/92
1,426.40
HANCO CORP
PARTS
034713
01/22/92
379.45
HANCO CORP
PARTS
1,805.85 *
034714
01/24/92
48.60
S A SCHWARTZ JR
REIMBURSEMENT
48.60 *
034715
01/22/92
932.04
JAY JAFFEE
PRO SERVICES
932.04 *
034716
01/22/92
221.05
MICHAEL NIBBE
CONT ED
221.05 *
034717
01/22/92
40.00
IACCI
DUES
1
02 -03 -92 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4600 - 420 -42
2016
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 420 -42
30- 4204 - 781 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78
26- 1300 - 000 -00
332185
10- 4310 - 440 -44
10- 4202 - 280 -28
27- 2010 - 000 -00
27- 2010 - 000 -00
27- 4201 - 667 -66
27- 4201 - 667 -66
27- 4201 - 667 -66
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 2010 - 000 -00
401624 8051
10- 4620- 560 -56
403395 8051
10- 4266- 420 -42
12- 4201 - 434 -43
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42
1
1992 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
034718
034718
034718
034719
034719
034720
034720
034720
034721
034722
034723
034724
034725
034726
034726
034727
034728
034729
034730
034731
034732
034733
S
01/27/92
01/22/92
01/27/92
01/22/92
01/27/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/22/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
01/24/92
AMOUNT
40.00 *
90.00-
90.00
45.00
45.00 *
85.00
176.00
261.00 *
4,284.00
4,284.00-
4,284.00
4,284.00 *
43.75
43.75 *
355.00
355.00 *
195.67
195.67 *
255.57
255.57 *
2,925.00
2,925.00 *
15.00
20.00
35.00 *
999.36
999.36 *
85.00
85.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
75.00
75.00 *
150.00
150.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
THE POLICE INSTITUTE
THE POLICE INSTITUTE
THE POLICE INSTITUTE
COSINES INC
COSINES INC
MAMA -LMC
MAMA -LMC
MAMA -LMC
PETERSON PORTRAITS
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS
RINGS & THINGS
MN CERAMICS SUPPLY
BUCKHORN
BOB CONNOLLY
BOB CONNOLLY
MN UC FUND
JIM SCHATTAUER
CHRIS MEYER
JACKI BETSWORTH
BACHMANS
MARIAN ALSTAD
PATTI JEUB
CONT ED
CONT ED
CONT ED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DUES
DUSE
DUSE
PORTRAIT
REPAIR PARTS
COST /GOODS SOLD
COST /GOODS SOLD
RECYCLING CONTAINERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
UNEMPLOYMENT CHG
2/27/92
2/9/92
2/6/92
4/30/92
4/28/92
4/23/92
02 -03 -92 PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4202 - 420 -42
8527
10- 4202 - 420 -42
8527
10- 4202 - 420 -42
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 784 -78
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4504 - 100 -10
8872
10- 4540- 646 -64
38671 8833
23- 4624 - 613 -61
91005 8544
23- 4624 - 613 -61
123661 8734
10- 2010 - 000 -00
116348 8519
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 781 -78
10- 4160 - 510 -51
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
l
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034734
01/24/92
25.00
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
4/9/92
25.00
*
034735
01/24/92
25.00
BARB MAKELA
4/7/92
25.00
*
034736
01/24/92
25.00
SUSAN FRAME
3/28/92
25.00
*
034737
01/24/92
25.00
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
3/19/92
25.00
*
034738
01/24/92
30.00
BOB CONNOLLY
3/15/92
30.00
*
034739
01/24/92
25.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
3/8/92
25.00
*
034740
01/24/92
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
3/5892
25.00
*
034741
01/24/92
174.40
SGD CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034741
01/24/92
320.07
SGD CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
494.47
*
034742
01/24/92
469.89
JAMES & CO INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
469.89
*
034743
01/24/92
121.95
BRUEGGARS BAGELS
REFUND
121.95
*
034744
01/24/92
62.48
SCHUSTER EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
62.48
*
034745
01/24/92
56.00
CENTRAL LOCK /SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56.00
*
034746
01/24/92
215.00
BEAR COMM INC
CABLE
215.00
*
034747
01/24/92
2,400.00
VEAP
HUMAN SERVICES
2,400.00
*
034748
01/24/92
50.00
MARIA BROWN
3/12/92
50.00
*
034749
01/24/92
50.00
DIANE RAINS
4/13/92
50.00
*
034750
01/24/92
50.00
MARILYN BOE
4/30/92
50.00
*
034751
01/27/92
57.00
MONDALE POLICY FORUM
CONT ED
57.00
*
02 -03 -92 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
27- 4504 - 666 -66 40478 7531
27- 4504 - 667 -66 40478 7531
27- 2010 - 000 -00 326909 8718
40- 1130 - 000 -00
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7208 8417
25- 4504 - 385 -30 8500
25- 4504 - 385 -30 10507 8363
10- 4201 - 504 -50
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
12- 4202 - 434 -43
3
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
RRRkRk
*R * -CKS
034753
01/27/92
540.00
STEVE SEGNER
SERVICE
50- 4233 - 820 -82
15333
034753
01/27/92
810.00
STEVE SEGNER
SERVICE
50- 4233 - 840 -84
15333
034753
01/27/92
810.00
STEVE SEGNER
SERVICE
50- 4233 - 860 -86
15333
2,160.00
*
034754
01/27/92
10.50
LOWELL MCCARTHY
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10.50
*
034755
01/27/92
948.00
LARSCO INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
8494
948.00
*
034756
01/27/92
72.50
MAHA DIST 6
ADVERTISING
27- 2010 - 000 -00
8995
72.50
*
034757
01/27/92
85.00
BLMGTN HTG /AIR COND
REPAIRS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
2174 8993
85.00
*
034758
01/27/92
108.00
KRATECH INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 667 -66
019887 8990
108.00
*
034759
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTER EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034760
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034761
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034762
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034763
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034764
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034765
01/27/92
15.00
NATL REGISTRY EMTS
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
15.00
*
034766
01/27/92
42.95
EMERGENCY
SUBSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 440 -44
42.95
*
034767
01/27/92
11.00
THOMAS JENSON
LICENSE
10- 4310 - 440 -44
11.00
*
034768
01/27/92
45.90
NIGHTINGALE CONANT
BOOKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
7183
45.90
*
034769
01/27/92
180.00
UNIQUE INSTALLATION
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
1126 7668
034769
01/27/92
261.00
UNIQUE INSTALLATION
BED REPAIRS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
1126 7668
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 5
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
441.00 *
034770
01/27/92
378.00
MAB ENTER INC
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
5507
8312
378.00 *
034771
01/27/92
499.66
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8308
499.66 *
034772
01/27/92
488.25
NEW PIG CORP
SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
799385
8309
488.25 *
034773
01/27/92
1,088.00
AM TEST CENTER
TEST LADDERS
10- 2010- 000 -00
8901
034773
01/27/92
1,088.00
AM TEST CENTER
TEST LADDERS
10- 4274 - 440 -44
8901
034773
01/27/92
1,088.00-
AM TEST CENTER
TEST LADDERS
10- 4274 - 440 -44
8901
1,088.00 *
034774
,01/27/92
252.44
DAN G JOHNSON
REPAIRS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
7186
034774
01/27/92
287.70
DAN G JOHNSON
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
8567
540.14 *
034775
01/27/92
60.00
ISFSI
DUES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
65873
034775
01/27/92
60.00-
ISFSI
DUES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
65873
034775
01/27/92
60.00
ISFSI
DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
65873
034775
01/27/92
93.31
ISFSI
HAZMAT INFO
10- 4570 - 440 -44
69829
8900
153.31 *
034776
01/27/92
69.00
IFSTA
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 440 -44
535324
8294
69.00 *
034777
01/27/92
24.50
CAROL BRIGHT
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
24.50 *
034778
01/27/92
28.00
CATY CRABB
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
28.00 *
034779
01/27/92
22.40
JULIE GREENWOOD
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
22.40 *
034780
01/27/92
87.43
SPECIAL EFFECTS
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
87.43 *
034781
01/27/92
37.45
BETTY THOMPSON
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
37.45 *
034782
01/27/92
85.40
CY TURNBLADH
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
85.40 *
034783
01/27/92
31.85
SHIRLEY WECHSLER
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
31.85 *
034784
01/27/92
31.50
HELEN VANWINKLE
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
31.50 *
034785
01/27/92
30.73
ANN WIDERSTROM
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
30.73 *
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4502 - 440 -44
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4204 - 440 -44
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034786
01/27/92
1,375.00
ROSE EDIN
AC INSTRUCTOR
30- 4224 - 781 -78
1,375.00 *
30- 4504- 784 -78
10232 8814
034787
01/27/92
70.00
FLORENCE WRIGHT
REFUND
70.00 *
034788
01/27/92
210.00
PATTI JEUB
AC INSTRUCTOR
210.00 *
034789
01/27/92
85.40
NORMA HANLON
ART WORK SOLD
034789
01/27/92
80.00
NORMA HANLON
AC INSTRUCTOR
034789
01/27/92
24.00
NORMA HANLON
CRAFT SUPPLIES
189.40 *
034790
01/27/92
30.00
BOB CONNOLLY
AC INSTRUCTOR
30.00 *
034791
01/27/92
168.00
LOUISE GILLIS
AC INSTRUCTOR
168.00 *
034792
01/27/92
180.00
DANNY MACKERMAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
180.00 *
034793
01/27/92
140.00
MN STATE FIRE
DUES
140.00 *
034794
01/27/92
107.80
PDR
PUBLICATIONS
107.80 *
034795
01/27/92
21.45
LABOR RELATIONS
BOOK
21.45 *
034796
01/27/92
20.90
ECONOMIC PRESS
SUBSCRIPTION
20.90 *
034797
01/27/92
80.00
CELLULAR 1 SALES /SVC
REPAIRS
80.00 *
034798
01/27/92
35.00
U OF M
CONT ED
35.00 *
034799
01/27/92
22.50
MSHS
MEMBERSHIP
22.50 *
034800
01/27/92
25.00
RICHARD CASEY
REFUND
25.00 *
034801
01/27/92
25.00
THERESA LAU
REFUND
25.00 *
034802
01/27/92
427.50
LIZ SUNNE
SERVICES
427.50 *
034803
01/27/92
312.00
OSWALD HOSE /ADAPR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
02 -03 -92 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 3625- 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
10- 4204 - 440 -44
10- 4502 - 440 -44
7669
10- 4502 - 440 -44
002253 8295
10- 4204 - 440 -44
10- 4248 - 440 -44
22631 8572
10- 4202 - 640 -64
10- 4202 - 640 -64
30- 3505 - 000 -00
30- 3505 - 000 -00
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4504- 784 -78
10232 8814
6
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE
312.00
*
034804
01/28/92
189.96
POOLPAK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
0780 883
034804
01/27/92
4,850.00
POOLPAK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 783 -78
0775 8722
5,039.96
*
034805
01/28/92
99.20
MPLS HEALTH DEPT
PRO SERVICE
10- 4201 - 420 -42
6541
99.20
*
034806
01/28/92
4,000.00
CORNERSTONE
HUMAN SERVICE
10- 4201 - 504 -50
4,000.00
*
034807
01/28/92
531.00
METRO ELECTRO PAINT
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901 - 420 -42
8282
531.00
*
034808
01/28/92
30.00
ROBERT GRUNSTROM
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
30.00
*
034809
01/28/92
29.27
RON MUNDALE
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
29.27
*
034810
01/28/92
29.80
MICHAEL SIITARI
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
29.80
*
034811
01/28/92
25.32
RON RIEGERT
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
25.32
*
034812
01/28/92
120.00
ASIAN TRANSLTN SVC
PRO SERVICES
10- 4201 - 420 -42
120.00
*
034813
01/28/92
251.57
ROGER OLWIN
TRAINING
10- 4901 - 420 -42
251.57
*
034814
01/28/92
39.00
MOBILE CELLULAR LTD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47
86895
39.00
*
034815
01/28/92
146.05
HUDSON MAP CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
4947 8892
146.05
*
034816
01/28/92
24.79
VIKTORS KONTERS
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
24.79
*
034817
01/28/92
284.32
MILTONA TURF PROD
TURF STAKES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
4150 8882
284.32
*
034818
01/28/92
20.00
DAVID RINE
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
20.00
*
034819
01/28/92
54,150.00
ASSOC POOL BLDERS
CONSTRUCTION
26- 2010 - 000 -00
54,150.00
*
034820
01/28/92
62.00
LEONARD OR MARY
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
62.00
*
034821
01/28/92
50,000.00
LESTER BLDG SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 006 -00
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50,000.00
*
034822
01/28/92
120.00
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 627 -62
120.00
*
034823
01/28/92
1,608.68
SERV MASTER / EDINA
REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 803 -80
917307
8816
1,608.68
*
034824
01/28/92
47.90
HCMC
BOOKS
10- 4502- 440 -44
8905
47.90
*
034825
01/28/92
6,795.00
METRO BLDG SYST INC
CONSTRUCTION
26- 1300 - 000 -00
108701
6,795.00
*
034826
01/28/92
350.00
ALLIANCE
CONTRACT
10- 4201 - 260 -26
350.00
*
034827
01/28/92
948.28
CONPUTER CITY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12- 4504- 434 -43
24024
8921
948.28
*
034828
01/28/92
199.00
LASER QUIPT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 781 -78
63022
9069
199.00
*
034829
01/28/92
9.24
VIKING LAB
GENERAK SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 782 -78
57383
8399
034829
01/28/92
258.95
VIKING LAB
WATER TREATMENT
30- 4564- 782-78
57330
9066
268.19
*
034830
01/28/92
687.00
VIKING IMPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
814
8721
687.00
*
034831
01/28/92
147.00
MICHAEL STEDDUM
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
147.00
*
034832
01/28/92
70.00
ELIZABETH SELDEN
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
70.00
*
034833
01/28/92
56.15
CHASELLE INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
230611
8543
56.15
*
034834
01/28/92
5.00
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
5.00
*
034835
01/28/92
63.09
TOM SHIRLEY
MILEAGE
30- 2010 - 000 -00
63.09
*
034836
01/28/92
43.95
CINDY WAKNITZ
MILEAGE
30- 4208 - 781 -78
43.95
*
034837
01/28/92
50.00
SIREK HYD SVC
SERVICES
30- 4288 - 784 -78
014225
50.00
*
034838
01/28/92
270.00
ABBRA EMPLYMT SVC
SERVICES
27- 2010 - 000 -00
3638
9021
270.00
*
034839
01/28/92
304.35
TOM HOUGNON
REIMBURSEMENT
27- 4202 - 661 -66
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
GENERAL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
8504
ALTERNATOR
304.35 *
034840
01/28/92
144.00
7237
8483
144.00 *
034841
01/28/92
559.80
10- 4504- 560 -56
7239
559.80 *
* * * * **
REBUILD
REPAIR
034A10
01/24/92
50.60
8682
ALTERNATOR
50.60 *
* * * * **
PSRTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
034A21
01/28/92
195.71
034A21
01/28/92
38.33
10- 4540 - 560 -56
16544
234.04 *
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
RESPIRATOR
*;:A 29
01/22/92
11.40
034A29
01/22/92
620.27
631.67 *
* * * * **
034A34
01/24/92
94.00
94.00
* * * * **
034A39
01/24/92
111.38
034A39
01/24/92
159.84
034A39
01/24/92
21.96
034A39
01/24/92
71.50
034A39
01/24/92
71.50
034A39
01/24/92
109.00
034A39
01/24/92
265.44
810.62 *
* * * * **
034A46
01/27/92
9.65
9.65 *
* * * * **
034A53
01/24/92
108.78 -
034A53
01/24/92
108.78
034A53
01/24/92
108.78
108.78
* * * * **
034A64
01/27/92
1,062.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SANDY SCHWARTZ REIMBURSEMENT
PRAIRIE ELECT CO REPAIRS
ABP MIDWEST
ADT SECURITY SYS
ADT SECURITY SYS
ALBINSON
ALBINSON
MEETING EXP
ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERVICES
SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
02 -03 -92 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4202 - 661 -66
27- 2010 - 000 -00 2268 8526
* ** -CKS
10- 4212 - 510 -51 535037 8891
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78
30- 4304 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4570 - 260 -26 079458 8395
40- 2010 - 000 -00 76167 8637
* ** -CKS
ALLIED PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 25148 8430
* ** -CKS
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
7238
8504
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 343 -30
7237
8483
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504- 560 -56
7239
8506
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
16018
8682
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR
PSRTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
16294
8598
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
16544
8681
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
RESPIRATOR
/CARTRIDGE
10- 4642 - 301 -30
7260
8632
ACTION MESSENGER
AMERICAN SHARECOM
AMERICAN SHARECOM
AMERICAN SHARECOM
MARIAN ALSTAD
SERVICE CONTRACT
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
AC INSTRUCTOR
30- 4288 - 781 -78
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4256 - 510 -51
10- 4256 - 510 -51
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
12812 8622
1,062.00
*
* ** -CKS
xxxxxx
10- 2010 - 000 -00
674464 7650
034A95
01/27/92
105.00
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
AC INSTRUCTOR
105.00
*
* ** -CKS
034A96
01/24/92
174.66
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
REPAIRS
174.66
*
50- 4248 - 821 -82
RRRRRR
50- 4516 - 840 -84
8759
034A99
01/28/92
21.94
AXT -LYLE
CONCESSIONS
21.94
*
50- 4626 - 822 -82
xxxxxx
50- 4626- 842 -84
034B01
01/24/92
34.50
B & B SEAT COVERS
REPAIR PARTS
34.50
*
xxRxxx
034803
01/22/92
54.00
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
034803
01/27/92
44.85
BENSON OPTICAL
GLASSES
98.85
*
R R R R R R
034807
01/27/92
32.20
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
ART WORK SOLD
32.20
*
RRxRRx
034813
01/24/92
117.00
BARR ENGINEERING
PRO ENG SERV
117.00
*
034B14
01/24/92
325.98
BOYER TRUCKS
PARTS
325.98
*
xxRxxR
034B21
01/22/92
24.88
BANKSYSTEMS
REPAIRS
034B21
01/27/92
100.88
BANKSYSTEMS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
125.76
*
034B22
01/27/92
1,310.70
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
034822
01/27/92
64.00
BEER WHOLESALERS
MIX
1,374.70
*
RRRxRR
034B27
01/27/92
187.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
034B27
01/27/92
338.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
034B27
01/27/92
265.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
791.00
02 -03 -92 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
23- 4201- 611 -61
10- 4248 - 560 -56 10694 8705
* ** -CKS
29- 4624 - 722 -72
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12812 8622
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
674464 7650
* ** -CKS
23- 3625 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 260 -26
10- 4620 - 560 -56
102707 8690
* ** -CKS
50- 4248 - 821 -82
5629
50- 4516 - 840 -84
8759
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626- 842 -84
50- 4626 - 862 -86
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034B30
01/22/92
17.50
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 160 -16
743646
034B30
01/22/92
93.28
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
743613
034830
01/22/92
4.40
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
743613
034B30
01/24/92
80.64
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
745189
034630
01/24/92
14.92
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
745215
034B30
01/22/92
118.51
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
743607
034B30
01/24/92
68.40
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 510 -51
746114
034B30
01/28/92
118.07
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 440 -44
746675
8568
515.72 *
034831
01/27/92
42.00
BETSY BRYANT
PT A MAINT
23- 4120 - 612 -61
034831
01/27/92
360.00
BETSY BRYANT
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
402.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034635
01/22/92
498.00
BECKER ARENA PRODUCT
REPAIRS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
12906
6047
034B35
01/28/92
380.00
BECKER ARENA PRODUCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
013439
8531
878.00 *
** * * **
* ** -CKS
034637
01/28/92
377.00
BISHOP TRAVEL CENTER
AIRFARE
10- 4901 - 420 -42
010948
377.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034846
01/24/92
236.17
BLMGT LINO /CARPET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
11041
8427
236.17 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034870
01/24/92
744.00
BARRETT MOV /STORE
MOVE VOTING MACHINE
10- 4201 - 180 -18
C30681
744.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034B74
01/27/92
215.00
BRADLEY BENN
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
034874
01/27/92
220.00
BRADLEY BENN
AC OFFICE ADM
23- 4120 - 611 -61
034674
01/27/92
202.00
BRADLEY BENN
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
637.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034C01
01/27/92
186.92-
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF COMM
23- 4624 - 611 -61
133206
8737
034C01
01/27/92
186.92
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF COMM
23- 4624 - 611 -61
133206
8737
034C01
01/22/92
153.31
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
132845
8733
034C01
01/22/92
425.06
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613-61
132668
8537
034C01
01/22/92
323.36
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624- 613 -61
132671
8539
034C01
01/27/92
186.92
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF COMM
23- 4624 - 613 -61
133206
8737
1,088.65
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
034C07
01/22/92
1,361.77
034C07
01/22/92
1,602.06
034C07
01/27/92
1,588.21
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
ADVERTISING
4,552.04 *
034C08
01/24/92
66.00
BEER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
66.00 *
* * * * **
OF BLOOMINGTON
HEALTH SERVICES
034C17
01/24/92
92.00
OF EDINA
WATER
92.00 *
* * * * **
CITY
OF EDINA
034C22
01/24/92
220.89
034C22
01/24/92
71.22
10- 2010 - 000 -00
292.11 *
* * * * **
WATER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034025
01/24/92
207.76
WATER
10- 4258- 520 -52
207.76 *
* * * * **
OF EDINA
WATER
034C30
01/22/92
143.80
OF EDINA
WATER
143.80 *
034C31
01/27/92
31,349.25
WATER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
31,349.25 *
* * * * **
OF RICHFIELD
SERVICES
034C33
01/27/92
28.64
034C33
01/27/92
28.64
034C33
01/27/92
196.90
034C33
01/27/92
245.23
034C33
01/27/92
196.90
034C33
01/27/92
196.90 -
034C33
01/27/92
96.66
034C33
01/27/92
28.64
624.71 *
034C34
01/22/92
1,007.25
1,007.25 *
034C35
01/27/92
214.00
214.00 *
* * * * **
034C44
01/22/92
677.98
677.98 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT
CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT
CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT
CSI GENERAL SUPPLIES
02 -03 -92 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4538- 318 -30 745573 6180
10- 4538- 318 -30 746530 6180
10- 4538 - 318 -30 746999 6180
25- 4504 - 385 -30 15502 8704
CDP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
CERT
POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
85994 8706
CERT
POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
104297 8522
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
ADVERTISING
10- 4210 - 140 -14
CITY
BEER
BEER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF BLOOMINGTON
HEALTH SERVICES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
14341
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258- 520 -52
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 520 -52
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
CITY
OF RICHFIELD
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 600 -60
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
1046
COCA
COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 2010- 000 -00
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
RRRRRR
034C51
01/24/92
2,443.80
MN DEPT OF
FUEL TAX
2,443.80 *
RRRRRR
034C54
01/24/92
132.51
CONVEYORS
REPAIR PARTS
132.51 *
RRRRRR
034C87
01/27/92
81.63
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
81.63 *
RRRRRR
034C89
01/28/92
31.50
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31.50 *
RRRRRR
034C92
01/27/92
195.97
CUSTOM FIRE APP
REPAIRS
195.97 *
RRRRRR
034D07
01/28/92
129.92
D.C. HEY CO.
REPAIRS
034D07
01/28/92
30.00
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
159.92 *
R R R k k k
034D24
01/27/92
46.50
DIANE SANKEY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034D24
01/27/92
6.26
DIANE SANKEY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
03024
01/27/92
23.35
DIANE SANKEY
CONT ED
76.11 *
RRRRRR
03026
01/27/92
228.00
TOBIE DICKER
PT AC MAINT
034D26
01/27/92
920.00
TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
1,148.00 *
RRRRRR
03031
01/24/92
217.75
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
034D31
01/24/92
401.02
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
618.77 *
R *RRkR
03036
01/27/92
431.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
431.00 *
02 -03 -92 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 2010- 000 -00 002068
* ** -CKS
50- 4540 - 821 -82 11431 8169
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48 8775
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 784 -78 52091 8810
**A-CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 003745 8902
* ** -CKS
23- 4248 - 612 -61 260047 9049
30- 4288 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4504 - 643 -64
10- 4802 - 280 -28
*** -CKS
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 21453 8239
40- 4540 - 803 -80 21552 8765
*** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
131.66
EAGLE
CHECK REGISTER
WINE
034E11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
RRRRRR
01/22/92
153.33
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
034E11
034D52
01/24/92
73.00
DISPATCH
COMM /MN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
034D52
01/24/92
31.50
DISPATCH
COMM /MN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
034D52
01/24/92
15.80
DISPATCH
COMM /MN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
034D52
01/28/92
76.00
DISPATCH
COMM /MN
SERVICE
CONTRACT
17.78
EMER MED. PRODUCTS
196.30
17.78
R R R R R R
034E11
01/22/92
131.66
EAGLE
WINE
WINE
034E11
01/22/92
163.20
EAGLE
WINE
BEER
034E11
01/22/92
153.33
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
034E11
01/22/92
67.20
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
034E11
01/27/92
209.37
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
034E71
50- 4632 - 862 -86
724.76
ELVIN SAFETY
50- 4632- 862 -86
529323
RRRRRR
034E17 01/27/92 314.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX
034E17 01/27/92 9,790.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER
10,104.60
R R R R R R
034E26
02 -03 -92 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
BEER
034E26
**A-CKS
27- 4504 - 661 -66
93908
BEER
27- 4504 - 661 -66
93909
19.20-
27- 4504- 661 -66
93909
034E26
30- 4288 - 782 -78
17420
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
MIX
* ** -CKS
50- 4628- 862 -86
528251
10- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 4630 - 842 -84
527828
59.00 *
50- 4632- 822 -82
527779
034E71
50- 4632 - 862 -86
527819
ELVIN SAFETY
50- 4632- 862 -86
529323
10- 4540 - 520 -52
180.20
* ** -CKS
50- 2010 - 000 -00
�. 50- 2010 - 000 -00
034E73
034E26
01/22/92
19.20
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
BEER
034E26
01/22/92
190.20-
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
BEER
034E26
01/22/92
19.20-
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
BEER
034E26
01/27/92
19.05•
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
MIX
209.25*
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034E29
1/23/92
59.00 *
Edina Art Center
Supplies
034E71
01/22/92
180.20
ELVIN SAFETY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
180.20
RRRRRR
034E73
01/27/92
17.78
EMER MED. PRODUCTS
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
17.78
RRRRRR
034E75
01/22/92
300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES
300.00 *
RRRRRR
034F37
01/24/92
245.00
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
REPAIR PARTS
245.00 *
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
lU- M7V4- OL / -OG
*sell e2f 02
to
50- 4630 - 862 -86
62863
50- 4630- 862 -86
62863
50- 4630- 862 -86
62863
50- 4632 - 862 -86
65027
10- 4504 - 627 -62
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48
8223
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
100820 8303
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
72991 8376
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
PAGE 15
CHECK REGISTER
MESSAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034F70
01/27/92
737.00
FRIDEN ALCATEL
MAINT AGREEMENT
737.00
*
* ** -CKS
R R * R * *
034F73
01/27/92
264.00
SUSAN FRAME
PT AC OFFICE
034F73
01/27/92
464.00
SUSAN FRAME
AC INSTRUCTOR
10- 2010 - 000 -00
728.00
*
* R R R R R
10- 4504 - 646 -64
384432 8497
034G02
01/27/92
1,045.00
LIZ GEREB.I
SERVICES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
1,045.00
*
R R R R R R
10- 4248 - 560 -56
40- 4580 - 803 -80
034G30
01/27/92
70.00
GENERAL SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034G30
01/28/92
70.00
GENERAL SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
140.00
*
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
034G32
01/22/92
115.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
LOCATE REQ
115.00
*
* * * * **
034G68
01/24/92
133.63
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
133.63
*
R R R R R R
034G70
01/27/92
772.00
MARGARET GUST
AC INSTRUCTOR
034G70
01/27/92
179.09
MARGARET GUST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
951.09
*
RRRRRR
034G72
01/22/92
114.00
GARY SMIEJA
REPAIRS
034G72
01/22/92
80.00
GARY SMIEJA
REPAIR PARTS
194.00
*
R R R R R R
034G79
01/24/92
10,000.00
GREUPNER -JOE
SERVICES
10,000.00
*
*RRR RR
034G88
01/27/92
600.00
PAT GEISHEKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
600.00
*
R R R R R R
034G93
01/27/92
288.00
JEAN GRAPP
AC INSTRUCTOR
02 -03 -92
PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
8002
* ** -CKS
23- 4120 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
30- 4224 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
27- 4504- 667 -66
033706 8991
27- 4504 - 667 -66
033779 9022
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
384432 8497
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
40- 4580 - 803 -80
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 661 -66
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92
PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
288.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034G95
01/27/92
120.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
120.00 *
034G96
01/24/92
7.00
GUY SPEAKER CO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
40- 4516 - 801 -80
7470
8523
7.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034H01
01/28/92
93.60
HEIMARK FOODS
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
9033
93.60 *
* ** * **
* ** -CKS
034H03
01/22/92
2,122.56
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
4221
8536
2,122.56 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034H33
01/28/92
401.08
HENN CTY SHERIFF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034H33
01/28/92
104.08-
HENN CTY SHERIFF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 4286 - 220 -22
034H33
01/28/92
401.08
HENN CTY SHERIFF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 4286 - 220 -22
034H33
01/28/92
297.00-
HENN CTY SHERIFF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 4286- 220 -22
401.08 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034H42
01/28/92
573.00
HERMAN MILLER INC.
OFFICE SYSTEM
30- 1340 - 000 -00
723983
8083
573.00 *
* * * * **
*** -CKS
034H56
01/28/92
169.85
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT
27- 4544 - 662 -66
355493
8654
169.85 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034I12
01/28/92
700.46
IBM CORP
DATA PROCESSING
10- 4233 - 420 -42
124790
7456
034I12
01/28/92
12,698.00
IBM CORP
DATA PROCESSING
10- 4233 - 420 -42
DlHM08
7456
13,398.46 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034I42
01/22/92
2,945.00
INDUST SUPPLY CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 2010 - 000 -00
879110
8320
2,945.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034J23
01/27/92
44.10
JR JOHNSON SUP
PLANTS
30- 4660 - 782 -78
51711
8758
44.10 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
034J35
01/24/92
034J35
01/22/92
034J35
01/28/92
034J35
01/28/92
kk *kkk
KNOX
034J68
01/28/92
034J68
01/28/92
034J68
01/28/92
034J68
01/28/92
034J68
01/28/92
kkkkkk
KNOX
034J99
01/28/92
*kkkkk
KNOX
034K09
01/24/92
kkkkkk
KNOX
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/24/92
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/24/92
034K35
01/27/92
034K35
01/27/92
034K35
01/27/92
034K35
01/27/92
034K35
01/27/92
034K35
01/22/92
034K35
01/28/92
034K35
01/28/92
034K35
01/28/92
034K35
01/24/92
kkkkkk
034K57 01/22/92
kkkkkk
034L02 01/22/92
AMOUNT
289.20
81.91
300.00
327.00
998.11
35.15
202.51
182.64
31.86
29.48
481.64
40.00
40.00
32.54
32.54
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING
JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING
JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING
JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING
ERIC FELTON
ERIC FELTON
ERIC FELTON
ERIC FELTON
ERIC FELTON
JANET CANTON
KAMAN INDUST TECH
22.58
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
85.11
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
69.42
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT .
22.47
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
22.58-
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
22.58
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
72.39
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
64.97
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
24.47
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
57.90
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
53.95
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
21.98
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
24.97
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
12.46
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
194.64
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
49.96
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
24.98
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
802.25 *
183.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
183.00 *
471.25 LABOR RELATIONS ASN
MILEAGE
CONT ED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MTG EXP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MILEAGE /LOGIS
REPAIR PARTS
BLDG SUPPLIES
BLDG SUPPPLIES
BLDG SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BLGD SUPPLIES
BLDG SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BEER
SERVICES
02 -03 -92 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4600 - 490 -49 9911
10- 4600 - 500 -50 9971
23- 4600 - 611 -61
23- 4600 - 611 -61 8542
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010- 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4540 - 560 -56 712355 8625
10- 2010 - 000 -00 003745 7045
10- 2010 - 000 -00 005891 7505
10- 2010 - 000 -00 003443 6890
10- 4504 - 318 -30 020208 8520
10- 4504 - 646 -64 003745 7045
10- 4504- 646 -64 003745 7045
10- 4540 - 520 -52 010254 8683
10- 4604 - 646 -64 010934 8832
10- 4604 - 646 -64 011121 8837
10- 4604 - 646 -64 010862 8817
10- 4604 - 646 -64 010889 8823
10- 4604 - 646 -64 011143 8852
10- 4604 - 646 -64 010365 8693
27- 2010 - 000 -00 017645 8188
27- 2010 - 000 -00 006822 7576
27- 4604 - 662 -66 020576 8764
40- 4504 - 801 -80 010222 8680
50- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4201 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
** *-CKS
kkk -CKS
* ** -CKS
**k-CKS
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92
PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
471.25.*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L09
01/28/92
553.20
J PATRICK MOORE CO
ADVERTISING
27 -2010- 000 -00
CE1103
8922
553.20
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L28
01/24/92
49.53
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8369
034L28
01/24/92
141.60
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
7949
034L28
01/24/92
214.77
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8412
034L28
01/24/92
485.42
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 2010- 000 -00
8409
034L28
01/24/92
265.18
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8630
034L28
01/24/92
399.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8341
034L28
01/24/92
241.88
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
8629
034L28
01/24/92
410.55
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 2010 - 000 -00
8349
2,208.78
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L34
01/22/92
57.98
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
23- 2010 - 000 -00
57.98
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L54
01/22/92
309.75
LUNDS
PLOWING
50- 2010 - 000 -00
15149
309.75
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L66
01/22/92
16.86
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIRS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
140542
8406
034L66
01/22/92
12.44
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
140611
8406
29.30
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L82
01/28/92
5.34
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
369330
034L82
01/28/92
25.84
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
369522
31.18
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034L84
01/27/92
180.00
NICK LEGEROS
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
180.00
*
* ** * **
* ** -CKS
034L98
01/24/92
3.75
MIDWEST MACHINERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
P22317
8487
3.75
* ** -CKS
:::*:;
M
01/24/92
8,105.42
MARK VII SALES
BEER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
034M07
01/24/92
8,105.40
MARK VII SALES
BEER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92 PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
034M07
01/24/92
8,105.42-
MARK VII SALES
BEER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
8,105.40 *
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M12
01/27/92
680.00
METROQUIP INC
LIFT RENTAL
27- 2010 - 000 -00
65115
7473
680.00 *
*kkkkR
* ** -CKS
034M16
01/28/92
783.00
McCAREN DESIGNS
PLSNTS
30- 2010 - 000 -00
6105
8319
783.00 *
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M19
01/24/92
13.37
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
45.72
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
2,225.01
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
37.12
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
4.34
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
152.10
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
143.74
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
30- 2010 - 000 -00
034M19
01/24/92
3.11
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
40 -2010- 000 -00
2,624.51 *
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M22
01/24/92
102.19
MCNEILUS STEEL
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
183137
8615
102.19 *
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M27
01/24/92
370.00
MERIT SUPPLY
ICE MELT
10- 4504 - 318 -30
28927
8521
034M27
01/24/92
154.50
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
28897
8489
034M27
01/28/92
127.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
23- 4512 - 612 -61
29040
8714
034M27
01/22/92
422.95
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4512- 702 -70
29041
8809
034M27
01/28/92
487.25
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
28992
8720
034M27
01/27/92
317.85
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
29007
8740
034M27
01/24/92
478.00
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
28898
8488
034M27
01/24/92
378.10
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
40- 4544 - 803 -80
28954
8610
034M27
01/22/92
169.50
MERIT SUPPLY
ICE MELT /BAGS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
28953
8618
2,905.15
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M29
01/27/92
246.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180 - 000 -00
518200
034M29
01/27/92
23.22
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180- 000 -00
518200
034M29
01/27/92
193.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180- 000 -00
518200
462.22
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
034M32
01/27/92
399.08
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 822 -82
10339
034M32
01/27/92
347.04
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 842 -84
10361
034M32
01/22/92
399.40
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 842 -84
10206
1992 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
034M32
01/27/92
242.00
034M32
- 01/22/92
277.12
27- 4624 - 663 -66
1,664.64 *
034M33
01/24/92
485.59
MN. BAR
MIX
485.59 *
* * * * **
CELLULAR ONE
CAR PHONE
034M35
01/22/92
244,847.00
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
244,847.00 *
* * * * **
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
034M42
01/22/92
735.40
10- 4226 - 420 -42
735.40 *
* * * * **
10- 4226 - 420 -42
034M46
01/28/92
7.82
034M46
01/28/92
16.42
034M46
01/22/92
26.12
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 436 -42
50.36 *
* * * * **
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
034M63
01/22/92
195.03
23- 4624 - 613 -61
64151 8736
195.03 *
* * * * **
10- 4210 - 140 -14
4124
034M68
01/27/92
98.69
034M68
01/28/92
8.08
034M68
01/28/92
34.45
034M68
01/28/92
91.56
034M68
01/28/92
9.63
034M68
01/28/92
125.97
034M68
01/28/92
11.31
034M68
01/28/92
938.99
034M68
01/28/92
53.13
1,371.81 *
034M69
01/28/92
81.20
81.20 *
* * * * **
034M80
01/24/92
44.72
034M80
01/24/92
44.72
89.44 *
034M81
01/27/92
107.40
107.40 *
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES
M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES
MN PETRO SERV REPAIR PARTS
METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES
02 -03 -92 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4632 - 862 -86 10268
50- 4632 - 862 -86 10189
10- 2010 - 000 -00 27731 8445
40- 4312 - 812 -80 505041
10- 2010 - 000 -00 6783
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
METZ BAKING CO
COST /GOODS SOLD
28- 4624- 703 -70
505291
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 2010- 000 -00
CELLULAR ONE
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 140 -14
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 436 -42
CELLULAR ONE
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MCC /MIDWEST
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
64151 8736
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISNG
10- 4210 - 140 -14
4124
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
10- 4210 - 140 -14
412
MN. TORO INC.
MOWER PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
243943 8080
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
034M83 01/22/92
* * * * **
034M85
01/24/92
034M85
01/22/92
* * * * **
s
034M92
01/22/92
* * * * **
034M97
01/22/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
1034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
034M98
01/28/92
* * * * **
034NO3
01/22/92
034NO3
01/22/92
* * * * **
034N13
01/27/92
034N13
01/27/92
* * * * **
034N16
01/22/92
034N16
01/22/92
034N16
01/22/92
AMOUNT
6.00
6.00 *
43.80
2,229.63
2,273.43 *
175.50
175.50 *
5,281.86
5,281.86
862.30
987.55
6,412.10
1,007.28
2,214.78
100.99
410.95
1,033.27
217.34
1,611.01
549.04
888.72
4,585.06
85.02
230.82
295.94
21,492.17
510.00
484.00
994.00 *
47.80
47.80
95.60 *
681.37
10.89
258.28
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES
MN. WANNER
MN. WANNER
MONARCH MARKETING
MPLS FINANCE DEPT
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MPLS SEWER & WATER
MPLS SEWER & WATER
MUZAK
MUZAK
NSP
NSP
NSP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
WATER PURCHASED
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
POWER /LIGHT
POWER /LIGHT
POWER /LIGHT
02 -03 -92 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
12- 2010 - 000 -00 97435 7919
10- 4504 - 646 -64 13537
10- 4540 - 646 -64 13506 8517
50- 4516 - 820 -82 167595
40- 2010: 000 -00
10- 4254 - 440 -44
10- 4254- 520 -52
10- 4254 - 540 -54
10- 4254 - 540 -54
10- 4254- 646 -64
10- 4254- 646 -64
23- 4254 - 612 -61
27- 4254 - 662 -66
27- 4254 - 664 -66
28- 4254 - 702 -70
30- 4254 - 784 -78
40- 4254 - 801 -80
40- 4254- 803 -80
50- 4254 - 821 -82
50- 4254 - 841 -84
50- 4254- 861 -86
40- 4248 - 801 -80 30935 8798
40- 4248 - 801 -80 30934 8797
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 862 -86
23- 2010 - 000 -00
26- 2010 - 000 -00
40- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
PAGE 22
CHECK REGISTER
MESSAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034N16
01/22/92
46.68
NSP -
POWER /LIGHT
034N16
01/22/92
444.04
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
30- 4624 - 784 -78
498346
1,441.26
*
496519 9067
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 784 -78
034N22
01/22/92
233.63
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
04987
233.63
*
R R R* R M
034N31
01/27/92
56.20
LL DIST SYSTEM
COST /GOODS SOLD
034N31
01/28/92
217.84
LL DIST SYSTEM
COST /GOODS SOLD
274.04
*
RRRRRR
034N36
01/28/92
38.12
NORTHERN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
38.12
*
RRRRRR
034N72
01/24/92
188.00
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES
034N72
01/24/92
1,647.45
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES
034N72
01/24/92
334.55
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES
2,170.00
RRRRRR
034N76
01/24/92
96.00
NTCC
REPAIR PARTS
96.00
R R R R R R
034N82
01/28/92
77.33
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
034N82
01/22/92
174.77
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
034N82
01/22/92
317.24
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
569.34
RRRRRR
034N88
01/27/92
290.00
J THOMAS NELSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
290.00
*
RRRRRR
034N97
01/27/92
181.00
LIA NICKLOW
PT AC MAINT
181.00
*
RRRRRR
034017
01/27/92
82.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034017
01/22/92
27.50
OFFICE PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034017
01/27/92
4,114.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
COMPUTERS
4,223.50
*
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 D25782 8414
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 192249 8738
23- 4624- 613 -61 191833 8538
23- 4624- 613 -61 191989 8546
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4120 - 612 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 240 -24 157019
10- 4504 - 510 -51 156852
10- 4901 - 440 -44 10024 8529
02 -03 -92
PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4
MESSAGE
40- 2010 - 000-00
41- 2010- 000 -00
* ** -CKS
50- 4304 - 841 -84
446991
* ** -CKS
30- 4624 - 784 -78
498346
30- 4624 - 784 -78
496519 9067
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 784 -78
510631
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
04987
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 D25782 8414
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 192249 8738
23- 4624- 613 -61 191833 8538
23- 4624- 613 -61 191989 8546
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4120 - 612 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 240 -24 157019
10- 4504 - 510 -51 156852
10- 4901 - 440 -44 10024 8529
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92
PAGE 23
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P'0. 4
MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034024
01/22/92
209.00
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
32022
034024
01/28/92
508.80
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
32020
9006
034024
01/28/92
533.55
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
32023
9007
034024
01/22/92
391.70
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
32021
1,643.05
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034036
01/28/92
474.12
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
REPAIR PARTS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
116453
7441
034036
01/27/92
51.00
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
REPAIRS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
116454
7442
525.12 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034050
01/28/92
597.00
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782-78
61817
8860
597.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034099
01/27/92
192.00
DOROTHY ODLAND
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
192.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034P30
01/22/92
402.14
PP�EPP�SII COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI 699 A BeTTC!N6
MIyx
Mix
50- 2010 - 000 -00
oA
40"2.14 *
rgg_
�JO 4692 842
r
2 &8;6
534P20
1/27/92
27.50 *
Paustis & Sons
Mix
50- 4632 - 842 -84
* ** -CKS
034P44
01/27/92
1,287.61
PHYSIO CONTROL
EQUIP
10- 4901 - 440 -44
B80291
7665
1,287.61 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034P48
01/28/92
44.40
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
7461
44.40 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034P78
01/28/92
26.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 784 -78
69452
034P78
01/27/92
13.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 784 -78
69626
39.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034P82
01/27/92
361.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
MIX
50-4632- 822 -82
529746
03082
01/22/92
98.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
527824
460.25 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
034Q16
01/27/92
56.18
QUALITY WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
668241
1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 24
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE
034Q16
01/27/92
56.18
034Q16
01/22/92
60.88
034Q16
01/22/92
56.18
8599
MONICA RUDQUIST
229.42 *
kRkkRk
034Q20
01/24/92
49.56
034Q20
01/24/92
41.16
SHOES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
90.72 *
RkRRkR
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
034R01
01/28/92
80.60
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
80.60 *
RkRRkR
REM SUPPLIES
034R12
01/24/92
2.54
034R12
01/24/92
17.16
30- 4504 - 781 -78
1474
19.70 *
*kRRkk
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
034R15
01/27/92
246.00
034R15
01/27/92
480.00
REM SUPPLIES
726.00 *
kkRRkR
01717
9064
034R21
01/22/92
87.55
034R21
01/22/92
95.20
034R21
01/22/92
173.40
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
356.15
034R22
01/27/92
379.40
034R22
01/28/92
929.50
034R22
01/28/92
355.62
034R22
01/27/92
167.54
034R22
01/28/92
268.38
2,100.44
kkkk *k
034R33
01/27/92
4,857.62
034R33
01/27/92
156.50
5,014.12 "
k *RRRR
034R35
01/22/92
201.20
201.20
RRRRRR
034R49
01/24/92
38.78
QUALITY WINE MIX
QUALITY WINE MIX
QUALITY WINE MIX
QUICK SERV BATTERY
QUICK SERV BATTERY
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
REPAIR PARTS
OIL FILTER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50- 4632- 842 -84 668240
50- 4632 - 842 -84 667978
50- 4632 - 862 -86 667985
10- 4540- 560 -56 83661 8601
10- 4540 - 560 -56 84361 8684
30- 4504 - 783 -78 15804
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 520 -52
50928
8457
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
674171
8599
MONICA RUDQUIST
PT MAINT
23- 4120- 612 -61
MONICA RUDQUIST
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
228399
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
228399
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
40- 2010 - 000 -00
228399
REM SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
10- 4642 - 646 -64
1429
8818
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 781 -78
1474
8322
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
01709
9065
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 784 -78
01496
REM SUPPLIES
COST /GOODS SOLD
30- 4624 - 784 -78
01717
9064
REX DISTR.
BEER
50- 2010- 000 -00
REX DISTR.
MIX
50- 2010 - 000 -00
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
PLUMBING
10- 4248 - 520 -52
8738
8806
ROAD RESCUE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
124813
8702
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
*RR -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
rt
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
8829
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* ** -CKS
38.78
*
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
57342 7491
034863
01/22/92
70.29
ROGERS PAINTING
GENERAL. SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
70.29
*
*Rk *kk
* ** -CKS
30- 4624- 784 -78
034899
01/28/92
56.20
8739
RUTH SCHMOLL
PETTY CASH
8645
56.20
*
30- 4580 - 784 -78
8672
30- 4580 - 784 -78
8739
034S03
01/24/92
9.81
S.T. ROBB
SCREWS
* ** -CKS
9.81
*
10- 4201 - 260 -26
kkk *R*
034S07
01/28/92
57.24
SPRUCE CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
57.24
*
034S10
01/28/92
23.50
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23.50
*
* * * * **
034S25
01/27/92
111.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST /GOODS SOLD
111.00
*
kkkk **
034S42
01/27/92
152.80
SEARS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034S42
01/27/92
316.35
SEARS
TOOLS
034S42
01/28/92
75.00
SEARS
TOOLS
034S42
01/27/92
239.39
SEARS
TOOLS
034S42
01/27/92
195.25
SEARS
TOOLS
978.79
*
034S54
01/27/92
75.40
STAR TRIBUNE
DUES
75.40
*
034S72
01/22/92
11.00
STREICHERS
SUPPLIES
11.00
*
034S73
01/28/92
1,885.55
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
PRO ENG SERV
1,885.55
*
k * * * **
* ** -CKS
02 -03 -92
PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
8829
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
57342 7491
* ** -CKS
30- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 784 -78
025152 8807
* ** -CKS
30- 4624- 784 -78
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 784 -78
8739
30- 4580 - 782 -78
8645
30- 4580 - 782 -78
8645
30- 4580 - 784 -78
8672
30- 4580 - 784 -78
8739
* ** -CKS
30- 4204 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 420 -42
408791
10- 4201 - 260 -26
3
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -03 -92
PAGE 26
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
034577
01/24/92
87.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
133798
034577
01/24/92
145.80
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
159832
034577
01/24/92
86.25
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
159915
034577
01/24/92
7.77
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
160063
034577
01/24/92
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
134069
426.82 "
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
034592
01/27/92
14.80
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10650
8986
034592
01/24/92
146.55
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISKS
10- 4504- 510 -51
010538
8864
034592
01/27/92
193.52
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10437
8812
034592
01/27/92
20.01
SYSTEM SUPPLY
PRINTER
RIBBON
10- 4516 - 440 -44
010419
374.88 *
R R R R R R
* ** -CKS
034T02
01/24/92
15.00
TAMARACK
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
200033
8426
034T02
01/24/92
108.76
TAMARACK
LUMBER
10- 2010 - 000 -00
200437
8444
123.76 *
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
034T26
01/27/92
256.40
THERMAL CO
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783-78
M22502
8805
256.40 *
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
034T30
01/24/92
12,538.95
THORPE DISTR.
BEER
50- 2010- 000 -00
12,538.95 *
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
034T40
01/24/92
102.17
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING
SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
425039
034T40
01/24/92
47.92
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 801 -80
161887
8609
034T40
01/24/92
62.25
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
162547
8037
212.34 *
RRRRRR
* ** -CKS
034T96
01/24/92
401.40
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
30710
8710
401.40 *
RRRRRR
**A,-CKS
034U05
01/27/92
49.36
US WEST CELLULAR
PHONE
12- 2010 - 000 -00
49.36 *
R R R R R R
* ** -CKS
034U14
01/24/92
21.58
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
8608
21.58 *
RRRRRR RRR -CKS
• r
C
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
034U25
01/27/92
034U25
01/24/92
034U25
01/24/92
034U25
01/24/92
* * * * **
SERV
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
034U27
01/28/92
* * * * **
213.68
034V05
01/27/92
034V06
01/28/92
034V06
01/28/92
034V06
01/28/92
* * * * **
168.12
034V30
01/28/92
* * * * **
034V57
01/22/92
* * * * **
034V80
01/24/92
034V80
01/22/92
034V80
01/27/92
* * * * **
*
034W08
01/24/92
034W08
01/22/92
034W08
01/27/92
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
48.90
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
OXYGEN
384.00
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
GENERAL SUPPLIES
384.00
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
GENERAL SUPPLIES
384.00-
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
GENERAL SUPPLIES
432.90 *
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
02 -03 -92 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4510 - 440 -44 763638 8899
25- 2010 - 000 -00 6107 8364
25- 4504 - 385 -30 6107 8364
25- 4504- 385 -30 6107 8364
407.40
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
364.05
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
17.57
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
131.21
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
51.99
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
172.56
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 667 -66
1,279.84
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
213.68
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
30- 4256- 784 -78
153.10
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
168.12
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
2,959.52
*
27.39
VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO.
TELEPHONE
30- 2010 - 000 -00
8982
27.39
*
18.33
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
50- 2010 - 000 -00
18.34
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
50- 2010 - 000 -00
18.33
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
50- 2010 - 000 -00
55.00
*
294.21
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
11916 8749
294.21
*
293.40
VIKING INDUS CTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 648 -64
435326 8703
293.40
*
24.72
VOSS LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 180 -18
298982 8585
439.62
VOSS LIGHTING
LIGHTS
10- 4606 - 646 -64
299156 8605
136.20
VOSS LIGHTING
LIGHTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
299147 8498
600.54
152.80
W.W. GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
249168 8607
252.96
W.W. GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
603268 8638
105.64
W.W. GRAINGER
REPAIRS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
255059 8804
511.40
*
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1992 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
034W13
01/22/92
7,496.63
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
PUMP REPAIR
034W13
01/22/92
882.36
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
REPAIRS
034W13
01/28/92
3,250.20
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
REPAIRS
11,629.19 *
* * * * **
034W44
01/24/92
57.55
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELDING SUPPLIES
57.55 *
* * * * **
034W49
01/24/92
89.66
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034W49
01/24/92
89.66-
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034W49
01/24/92
87.66
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
SERVICE REPAIR
87.66 *.
* * * * **
034W76
01/28/92
62.85
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034W76
01/28/92
245.48
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
308.33
034W99
01/27/92
252.00
CYD WICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
252.00
* * * * **
034X05
01/22/92
821.56
XEROX CORP
MAINT
034X05
01/22/92
480.38
XEROX CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034X05
01/28/92
123.63
XEROX CORP
PRINTING
1,425.57
* * * * **
034Z14
01/24/92
171.93
ZIEGLER INC
REPAIR-PARTS
171.93
* * * * **
034Z99
01/27/92
135.00
BOBO ZINN
AC INSTRUCTOR
034Z99
01/27/92
69.63
BOBO ZINN
CRAFT SUPPLIES
204.63 *
:::L 28
01/24/92
152.13
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
152.13 *
* * * * **
127,485.36
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1,992.68
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
,J
02 -03 -92 PAGE 28
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4248 - 801 -80 18290 8413
40- 4248 - 801 -80 18271 8616
40- 4248 - 801 -80 18478 8815
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 92758 8678
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631
10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631
10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 81999 8728
27- 4636- 667 -66 81999 8728
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4226 - 510 -51
10- 4504- 510 -51 8663
10- 4600 - 140 -14
*** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 8675
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 8348
* ** -CKS
r s
1992 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR
15,414.38
FUND
23
TOTAL
721.00
FUND
25
TOTAL
129,573.89
FUND
26
TOTAL
70,615.26
FUND
27
TOTAL
2,558.08
FUND
28
TOTAL
21.94
FUND
29
TOTAL
22,313.16
FUND
30
TOTAL
276,236.33
FUND
40
TOTAL
444.04
FUND
41
TOTAL
47,790.09
FUND
50
TOTAL
695,166.21 TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
SWIMMING POOL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
02 -03 -92 PAGE 29
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE