Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-03_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 3, 1992 ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of Consent Agenda items is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its.normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL,OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of January 21, 1992 * II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS' - III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of January 21, 1992 II. REPORT ON EIS - I -494 Corridor from I -394 to Minnesota River III. REPORT ON TRAFFIC STUDY - Tracy Avenue from West 66th St to West 70th St IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4 /5-favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Plat Approval - Peter Andrea 1st Addition - 6996 Valley View Rd B. Set Hearing Dates (02/18/92) * 1. Rezoning and Lot Division - Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition * 2. Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition * V. PUBLIC HEARING ON ALLEY VACATION - Alley between 5411 Zenith Av and 5408 York Av (Contd from 12/16/91) VI. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council requires to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 142 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 142 to Increase Amount of Continuing Bond VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council February 3, 1992 Page 2 VIII. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Fairway Aerator * B. 16 Foot Tractor Rotary Mower * C. Golf Course Sand Rake * D. Used Hydraulic Articulated Grader (Contd from 01/21/92) * K. Traffic Paint * F. Seger Jet (Continue to,02/18/92) IX. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A._ -_Tax Forfeited Land - Hennepin County List 773 -NC (Contd from 1/21/92). B. Appointments - Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees * C. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector * D. Change of Polling Location X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XIII. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/03/92: Total $695,166.21 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Wed Feb 5 MLC Legislative Dinner 6:30 P.M. Decathlon Sun Feb 9 Edina Cultural Expo '92 4:00 P.M. Edina High School Mon Feb 17 PRESIDENTS' DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Feb 18 Regular Council Meeting Mon Mar 2 Regular Council Meeting Mon Mar 16 Regular Council Meeting Wed Mar 18 .Annual Council /Boards /Commissions Dinner 7:00 P.M. Council Room 7:00 P.M. Council Room 7:00 P.M. Council Room 6:00 P.M. Braemar ClubhousL Poor Quality Document Disclaimer The original or copy of a document or page of a document presented at the time of digital scanning contained within this digital file may be of substandard quality for viewing, printing or faxing needs. NINUTES OF THE EDnU HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 21, 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the HRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE METING OF JANUARY 6. 1992, APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve BRA Minutes of January 6, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS DECK AND FOUNDATION WATERPROOFING Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice for award of bid for Centennial Lakes condominium deck and foundation waterproofing to sole bidder, Kremer and Davis at $26,770.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION APPOINTMENT MADE TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS Executive Director Hughes indicated that Ronald Ringling has served on the Board of Directors of the East Edina Housing Foundation since its establishment in 1985. Staff recommends his reappointment to a three year term to 1995. Notion was made by Commissioner Rice to reappoint Ronald Ringling to the Board of Directors of the East Edina Housing Foundation for a three year term to February 1, 1995. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 21, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling $41,878.46. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1992 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 9 MESSAGE 034700 01/29/92 14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR BOND PAYMENT 01- 4302 - 133 -12 14,166.67 * * * ** ** * ** -CKS 034800 01/29/92 9.00 ELLSWORTH CASPERSON REFUND 01- 3140 - 131 -12 9.00 * 034801 01/29/92 1,628.00 WALKER PARKING ENO FEES 01- 1319 - 131 -12 66719 10,792.70 * 034802 01/29/92 4,495.00 WENZEL MECHANICAL HOT WATER SYSTEM 01- 1390 - 133 -12 51441 451 4,495.00 * 034803 01/29/92 68.67 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 01- 4000 - 134 -12 68.67 * 034804 01129/92 9,164.70 Value Recreation Play ground Equip 01- 1340 - 134 -12 * ** -CKS 29,532.04 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA 29,532.04 TOTAL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 21, 1992 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CUB SCOUT MEN 4. BOY SCOUT TROOPS 62 AND 48 WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed members of Cub Scout Den 4, Boy Scout Troop 62 from St. Stephen's Church and Boy Scout Troop 48 from Calvary Lutheran Church who are working on merit badges. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 16, 1991, JANUARY 6. 1992 AND YEAR END MEETING OF DECEMBER 30, 1991 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 16, 1991, and January 6, 1992, and the Year End Meeting of December 30,'1991. Motion carried•on rollcall vote - five ayes. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 (TO INCREASE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND) Manager Rosland explained that staff would recommend increasing the amount of the bond required under Ordinance No. 142 to bring the bonding amount closer to the current job cost value and to cover liability if a claim is made. Staff is in the process of licensing contractors for the 1992 business year and it would be advantageous to have this change incorporated at this time to coincide with the licensing process. Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 142 -A2 for First Reading as follows: . ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142 TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby mended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Bonds. Unless exempt by state law, every applicant for (i) a license registration for the carrying on within the City of the business of plumbing, water softener installing, well drilling,or building moving, or (ii) a license pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 429, Part l (Oil Burner Installer), 429, Part 2 (Stoker Installer), 429, Part 3 (Steam and Hot Water Heating Installer), 429, Part 4 (Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning Installer), 429,'Part 5 (Refrigeration Installer), 431, Part 4 (Gas Fitter) and 1302 (Scavenger) shall file with such application a bond that is valid and in force and effect in the penal sum of at least $5,000.00, with a corporate surety approved by the City Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all material and equipment furnished, and as to all business carried on or all work done, commenced or performed during the term of the license, license registration or renewal thereof shall:" Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon passage and publication. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE 2 1/2 YARD, FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATED LOADER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one 2 1/2 yard, four -wheel drive articulated loader to sole bidder, Ziegler, Inc., at $96,944.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.' *AWARD OF BID CONTINUED TO 02/03/92 FOR USED HYDRAULIC ARTICULATED GRADER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue'award of bid for a used hydraulic articulated grader to February 3, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DRIVING RANGE TRACTOR Notion was made by.Nember Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a driving range tractor to recommended low bidder, Northstar Turf, at $5,105.00 with trade. Motion carried on rollcall.vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC CENTER CONCESSION STAND EQUIPMENT Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the Aquatic Center concession stand replacement equipment to recommended low bidder, Stan Morgan and Associates, at $6,723.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote.- five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REEL NOWER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a reel mower to recommended low bidder, Cushman Motors, at $6,500.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FILING SYSTEM/BUILDING DEPARTMENT Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a filing system for the Building Department to Wright Line at $5,545.12 through state contract. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR VARIOUS TRAFFIC SIGN SUPPLIES Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for various traffic sign supplies to Lyle Signs at $6,692.74 per Hennepin County Contract #2052A1 -232. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FIVE 1992 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLES AND ONE 1992 MID- SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for five 1992 full -size pursuit vehicles and one 1992 mid -size pursuit vehicle to Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $76,847.00 through State and Hennepin County Purchasing Cooperatives. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1992 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by.Member Rice for award of bid for one 1992 full - size police pursuit vehicle to Superior Ford at $12,822.00 through State Purchasing Cooperative. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.. HENNEPIN COUNTY LIST 773 -NC TAX FORFEITED LAND RECOMMENDATIONS CONSIDERED RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING OUTLOT B. DEARBORN ADDITION FOR PRIVATE AUCTION: ACTION ON ROBERT HANSEN PROPERTY CONTINUED TO 02/03/92 Planner Larsen presented Hennepin County List 773 -NC of tax forfeited land located in the City. He Y explained that property taxes have not been paid for a period of seven years on the two parcels listed. The County has requested Council resolutions approving the parcels for public auction to be included in a Spring 1992 public auction. The owners have the ability to pay the back taxes and any special assessments due on the property to reclaim the parcels at any time prior to auction. Parcel A (06- 116 -21 -21 -0005) - A vacant parcel of about three acres, owned by Robert Hansen and generally located north of.Highway No. 62 and west of Gleason Court. A number of development proposals have been given preliminary approval by the Council but none have been given final approval. Staff believes this parcel should and will ultimately be developed privately, sees no benefit in public ownership and would recommend that the Council approve public auction of the property. Member Rice commented that there are substantial unpaid special assessments on the parcel and asked if the City would recover those. He also asked what the land is currently zoned. Planner Larsen explained that if the parcel is sold at public auction the City would be paid first. If the sale price is less that the special assessments the City would get all of that. If the amount collected is more than the special assessments the City would be paid what it is owed. The property is still zoned R -1 as no final approval has been given for development. Mayor Richards asked if the City could acquire the land at no cost, hold it until the market improves and then sell it to recoup the unpaid special assessments. Attorney Gilligan opined that under state statute if the City were to acquire the property is must be for public purposes only. The City cannot be in the business of banking land for future development. Mayor Richards then asked if the City could request Hennepin County to withhold the parcel from public auction for a period of time. Planner Larsen recalled that about a year ago the City had asked that a certain parcel be withheld from auction for one year and the County had agreed to that. Mayor Richards observed that some years ago the residents in that neighborhood had participated in the purchase of the Krahl Hill as open space. He commented that they may have some interest in participating in the purchase of the subject property. Member Rice made a motion to continue action on Parcel A to the Council meeting of February 3, 1992, and to instruct staff to communicate with residents in the area to see if they are interested in participating in the purchase of the property as additional open space. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Parcel B (30- 117 -21 -21 -0162) - A 10 foot by 125 foot strip of land between a City owned pon ding area and a developed single family property directly to the south. The strip was platted as an outlot of the Dearborn Addition in 1984. The adjacent homeowner has been maintaining this as part of his lawn. It appears that the strip was platted as an outlot in order to easily convey the property to this homeowner. However, the conveyance did not occur and the Dearborn Addition developers have allowed it to go tax forfeit. Since the land has no public benefit, cannot be independently developed and directly relates to an adjacent property, staff would recommend private auction to the adjacent land owner. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for,non- payment of property taxes, which said list was received on December 13, 1991, Non '-Conservation List 773 -NC; and AREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PINS No. 30- 117 -21 -21 -0162 has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; WHEREAS, it has.been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no existing or pending special assessments on said parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said classification is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcel of land is not buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance and that sale of said parcel be limited to the adjacent property owner (6600 Belmore Lane) for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1992. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY CO16MIZ°1'EE Notion was made by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Betsy Larson to.the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term from 2/1/92 to 2/1/94, to fill an existing vacancy. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE ACKNOWLEDGED FROM MASSAGE LICENSEE Mayor Richards referred to correspondence from Ronald David Edblom, 610 84th Lane Northwest, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 (holder of a massage license), asking to be placed on an upcoming Council agenda to seek a waiver on the ordinance requirements for a massage business license. Member Smith emphasized that the Council generally does not waive ordinance requirements. Mayor Richards asked staff to convey that message and to inform Mr. Edblom to go through the normal process for a license. SUMMARY OF DRAFT EIS PRESENTED FOR I -494 FROM I -394 TO THE MINNESOTA RIVER Engineer Hoffman explained that Edina has been participating in the I -494 EIS process for some time and the EIS process is reaching the public hearing timeframe. The official public hearing involving the whole corridor will be held in April or May, 1992. He presented a summary of the document for review prior to a presentation by MNDOT and a BRW consultant at the February 3,.1992, Council meeting when they would explain how this would affect Edina properties along I -494. Engineer Hoffman pointed out the following: 1) Construction of the project would take approximately ten years while construction work within each segment could take from one to three years. 2) The cost estimates for the build alternatives range from $541.5 to $612.0 million for Build Alternative 1 and from $582.5 to $650.1 million for Build Alternative 2. 3) The estimated right of way costs would be between $140 and $165 million. 4) Right of way implications that would affect Edina would be at the interchanges of I- 494 /Highway 100 and Highway 196/I -494. Member Paulus asked that Larry Laukka be in attendance at the February 3, 1992, Council Meeting as he has represented Edina businesses in the I -494 Corridor in the past and is an Edina resident. Member Smith inquired whether the philosophy of the project was simply to widen and lay down more pavement or was a creative solution being sought to deflect more traffic. Engineer Hoffman said high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and light rail studies have been made. Light rail has been discarded while the study showed that a HOV land should be included in the I -494 system. If some of the suggestions are not implemented there will be more local traffic problems in Edina, e.g. Tracy Avenue and Parkwood Knolls. Member Smith asked why the study did not include building another highway five miles south. Engineer Hoffman said the destination of the traffic using I -494 is within the five city I -494 corridor area. Member Rice suggested that William Crawford, MNDOT Metro District Engineer, be asked to attend the February 3, 1992 Council Meeting also. DRAFT ORDINANCE ON SATELLITE DISHES/ANTENNAS DISCUSSED: PERMIT AUTHORIZED FOR REPIACEMENT ANTENNA AT 7600 METRO BOULEVARD Mayor Richards mentioned that at the codification work session on January 18, 1992, the Council had reviewed the draft . ordinance on satellite dishes, antennas and towers and had asked for additional information relating to those types of installations. Coincidentally, a call was received from General Motors, 7600 Metro Boulevard, who felt adversely impacted by the current moratorium on issuance of permits for dishes, antennas and towers. Planner Larsen submitted the following information: 1) The typical south and southwest suburbs by ordinance limit the maximum height of towers and antennas to 60 -65 feet which coincides with Edina's proposed ordinance. 2) Mesh vs. solid dishes - For residential installations mesh is cheaper to manufacture, ship and install, has less wind resistance and requires less support than a solid dish. The difference between the two types is that they operate on different bands - "C" band and "KU" band. The "KU" band requires a solid dish because of wave length. The smaller dishes that send /receive and replace a phone line are the new technology (two foot by four foot) for home installations. 3) Antennas installed in residential settings are usually round dishes of 8, 10 or 12 feet diameter. Most 8 foot dishes do not provide satisfactory reception while 10 foot dishes do, so that most business is for the 10 foot dish. Based on that, the proposed draft ordinance has a combination for the 12 foot ground mounted dish (15 feet total height from the ground) so it could be elevated and angled to receive the satellite signal. The alternative would be to allow only a maximum 10 foot diameter dish. Installations range in price from $2,400 to $4,000 for a single family home. Slides.were then shown illustrating various satellite dishes and antennas that were installed in the City prior to the moratorium instituted on March 4, 1991. It was noted that staff had attempted to reach the persons who had wanted to appear before Council to give a presentation on cellular phones and satellite dishes. Staff would recommend that the Council hold a public hearing on the draft ordinance relating to dishes, antennas and towers on February 18, 1992, so that the Council could take an action before the moratorium expires. Member Smith asked what the process would be in the case of a request to place an antenna on top of a building that had already been granted a variance on height. Planner Larsen said that the draft antenna ordinance is set up the same as the zoning and sign ordinances. When someone requests a variance to locate an antenna the matter would be heard by the Board of Appeals. If the Board's decision were then appealed it would come before the Council. Member Smith said his concern was granting a variance for an antenna when a variance had already been given for the building height. Shirley Wilson, stated she was Operations Manager for Electronic Data Systems and was representing General Motors Service Parts located at 7600 Metro Boulevard. Currently there is a solid 1.8 meter satellite dish mounted on the roof which can only be used to receive data. General Motors is going through financial difficulties and it is costing them a great deal of money to continue on -the - public -dedicated circuit as opposed to going to a satellite dish that could both receive and transmit data. Their request is to replace the existing dish and relocate it approximately 70 feet closer to the perimeter of the building. There would be no physical difference in dish size but the new dish would enable them to receive and transmit. The relocation would allow repair of the roof which is badly needed. Planner Larsen clarified that what they are proposing to install would comply with all ordinance restrictions and would have the least visible impact on the area. Member Smith moved adoption of the following Preamble and adoption of Ordinance No. 114 -A2 as follows with waiver of Second Reading: PREAMBLE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on March 4, 1991, did direct the City staff to conduct studies of the applicable plans and ordinances of the City, and to give information to, and to make recommendations to, the City Council relative to the need and desirability, if any, for adopting nev or amending existing plans and ordinances of the City relating to restricting, regulating or controlling the erection, location, size and use of towers, antennas and dish antennas within the City; and WHEREAS, to allow such studies to go on and to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City, the City Council found it necessary and desirable to adopt, and did adopt, on March 4, 1991, Ordinance Po. 114 imposing a moratorium. on the issuance of any permits for the construction, erection and relocation in the City of any tower, antenna or dish antenna, as defined in Ordinance Po. 812 of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has received a request from General Motors located at 7600 Metro Boulevard in the City that it be allowed to replace the existing dish antenna on the roof of such building with a similarly sized dish antenna on a different location on the roof of;such building in order to accommodate necessary repairs to the roof and to upgrade the antenna to permit transmission of signals; and WHEREAS, it was the intent and purpose of the City Council in directing such studies by City staff and adopting Ordinance No. 114 to prevent uncontrolled proliferation of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas, especially in or near residential areas, so as to protect the health, safety or welfare of the citizens of the City, but the City Council recognizes that General Motors will suffer an undue hardship due to circumstances unique to the building located at 7600 Metro Boulevard if the moratorium is imposed on the replacement of the dish antenna on such building, and that allowing such replacement will not adversely affect the intent and purpose of the City Council in directing such studies and adopting. Ordinance No. 114 if such antenna is of similar size as the existing antenna. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 114 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 114 TO ALLOW ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR CERTAIN ANTENNAS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Permits Allowed. Notwithstanding the moratorium imposed by Ordinance No. 114, and the provisions of that ordinance, a permit may be applied. for, and issued, pursuant to the applicable ordinances of the City, for a dish antenna to be situated.on the roof located at 7600 Metro Boulevard, in the'City, provided such dish antenna does not exceed six (6) feet in diameter, does not exceed a height of eight (8) feet (when measured from the roof to the highest point of the antenna). Sec. 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and publication. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. PAY EOUITY REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED TO STATE Manager Rosland explained that the City is required to submit a pay equity report on January 31, 1992 to the Department of Employee Relations providing information concerning salaries and wages of City employees. Staff has been directed to complete the forms and to provide the information requested. Manager Rosland asked the Council to authorize Mayor Richards to sign the completed report prior to submission to the State. Member Paulus made a motion authorizing Mayor Richards to sign the pay equity report for submission to the Department of Employee Relations. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED FOR ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND Member Kelly introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves the assignment by its depository, First Bank National Association, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description Rate Due Par Value U S Treasury 7 7/8 Note M 92 7.875 7/31/92 $ 300,000.00 U S Treasury 7 1/3 Note G 93 7.250 7/15/93 $3.460.000.00 $3,760,000.00 RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves the assignment by its depository, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description Rate Due Par Value Federal Home Loan Mtg. Corp 5.88 11/15/19 $ 625,000.00 Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 21, 1992 and consisting of 41 pages: General Fund $1,861,871.16; Communications $8,744.16; Art Center $2,113.76; Capital Fund $225.00; Swimming Pool Fund $703.93; Golf Course Fund $22,437.97; Recreation Center Fund $15,506.78; Gun Range Fund $929.38; Edinborough Park $43,162.29; Utility Fund $153,039.80; Storm Sewer Utility $246,285.77; Liquor Dispensary $76,378.12; Construction Fund $49,202.63; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $279,455.00; TOTAL $2,760,055.75; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 31, 1991 and consisting 17 pages: General Fund $148.334.44; Liquor Dispensary Fund $342,401.72; TOTAL $490,736.16. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Fund as of There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M. City Clerk a w91NA1r� o e, • 'N�bRPOM��� • iae6 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # I I From: Francis Hoffman ,; =;,L Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: February 3, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 'Subject: I -494 EIS Report To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare a Council position for the EIS public hearing in April 1992 Info /Background The following individuals will be in attendance to present the EIS findings and comments as it pertains to Edina: Bill Crawford - Metro Engineer from Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) Craig Robinson - Project Manager for the-I -494 EIS from MNDOT Tony Hepplemann - Consulting Engineer from BRW Consulting Firm doing I -494 EIS work Larry Laukka - Improve 494 (Private Sector Participant) Attached are three figures which graphically portray the freeway interchange alternatives being reviewed in the EIS. The primary issues for Edina.will be loss of access at the I -494 and 169 interchange (Old County Road 18) and its relationship to the East Bush Lake /I -494 interchange alternatives. The second main issue is the impact at Highway 100 and I -494 inter- change on surrounding properties. The attached graphics are difficult to read even in a larger scale, but the major change is to construct a full access interchange at East Bush Lake (eastbound & westbound) to provide access to our Edina Interchange Center. Current access causes traffic overloads at W. 77th and Highway 100. KI 11 Lul 7� u z i Cd 1 1 � i r 1 r � 1 1, N � IN I ,�•� BY 1 OTHER' a i _ r wN I BY OTHERS --------------- oJ OPTION 113 ; FULLY DIRECTIONAL f J I warlmn NQ •i / � may^ � � - / r i- f � .. ' `�Z j 7 � 7 � * NOTE: RAMPS TO AND FROM THE SOUTH ON CSAH 18 AT HIGHWOOD AVE. ARE OPTIONAL UNDER EITHER INTERCHANGE SUBALTERNATIVE. r/ e Jil 11II IIIII�r II��I m �� ; • ' FI I SH CS7 i 1 C' r, -t ♦' , -11max— — DRAFT Figure 3.9 -3a. llm494 ►� ENVIRONMENTAL T.H.51212- T.H.1691C.S.A.H.18 INTERCHANGE AREA TA7 m o Z ; K IMPACT SUBALTERNATIVES 1 A AND 1 B TA62 i =r E IIRECONSTRUCTION • SPLIT DIAMOND- BETWEEN PRAIRIE CENTER DR. & WASHINGTCN -AVE -- — — MINNESOTA RIVER TO I -394 STATEMENT FULL ACCESS AT E BUSH LAKE RD. 0 200 w � ® TK169 1 If ff W' Z 3 O 0 .N �8N\A 4� �j --�,W t:3� W Q W Ur Z = SCHEMATIC v, If Figure 3.10 ' -384 Ui DRAFT lm494 T.H.100 /NORMANDALE BLVD. (C.:�.A.H.34) INTERCHANGE AREA U K ENVIRONMENTAL T.K� m o SUBALTERNATIVE 1 OPTION • SEMI - DIRECTIONAL WITH LOOPS T.H.100 a i E RECONSTRUCTION IMPACT AT • SINGLE POINT DIAMOND AT E BUSH LAKE RD. MINIMUM AT 77TH g2r r.Kes r.K °18B �4es MINNESOTA RIVER TO1-394 STATEMENT RUC FRANCE 484THST/NORMANDALEAT-GRADE a =o, ,� any t R • RECONSTRUCT FRANCE AVE. . If j� 1 1 I 1 L 1 E z O O a ,V� J 1 __uVEBEF ;SfL A E. BUSH LAKE RD. OPTION 11 - m -- - RECONSTRUCTION MINNESOTA RIVER TO 1-394 1 J _ a � a . a E, / 1 }f� n +o r t S A bd J 1 V R j V, I 1 1 1. • 1 1 1. 1 1 Y, i� 1 a E_ QPTION FOR (' 1 77TH ST. t W. 77TH S" = w r= y > W. 77TH ST. OPTION 1_; v 1 P �_ rn, n-' ;'-- � OrQ , w 1 -384 w Zm �\ cc L=1 - T.li7 W T.H62 DRAFT- Figure 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL T-.H.1-00 /NORMANDALE BLVD. (C.S.A:H.34) INTERCHANGE AREA - IMPACT SUBALTERNATIVE 2 OPTION • PARTIAL DIRECTIONAL WITH LOOPS AT T.H.100 • DIAMOND WITH LOOP OR FOLDED DIAMOND AT E. BUSH'LAKE RD. STATEMENT • FOLDED DIAMOND OR DIAMOND WITH LOOP AT W. 77TH ST. 0 4 0o soo Q OFN • RECONSTRUCT FRANCE AVE. • 84TH ST. /NORMANDALI= BLVD. AT— GRADE 0 1 -384 �\ T.li7 W T.H62 R TA L Ii166 1 -464 o1 Jch 0 �V)/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL- From: From: N� HOFFMA . ! ;> DIRECTOR OF PUB ❑ WORKS Date: FEBRUARY 3, 1992 S_ ubject: 0 TRACY AVENUE Action WEST 66th to WEST Motion 70th STREET ❑ TRAFFIC REPORT REVIEW Recommendation: Agenda Item # III: Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review report with consultant and evaluate the public hearing testimony to determine if any traffic diversion should be considered at the time. Info /Background: The Edina City Council reviewed a Traffic Report on Tracy Avenue from West 66th Street to West 70th Street at its December 16th, 1991, meeting. Council directed staff to send out notices for a public hearing on the issue. Approximately 400 homeowner's received a packet containing a notice of public hearing and a abbreviated version of the report. Attached to this memorandum is the mailed notice and the response from the neighborhood. Dennis Eyler of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch will make a presenta- tion at the City Council meeting on his report. Staff will make a short presentation indicating what has occurred up to the time the traffic report request was requested. 0 rim City of Edina Dear Resident: The Edina City Council will meet on February 3rd, 1992 at 7 :00 PM in the City Council Chambers to review'a traffic report prepared at Council request regarding traffic in your general area. The specific review - involved rush hour traffic diverting from the City collector streets onto Tracy Avenue from West 66th to West 70th Street. The following materials are enclosed for your review: (A) Traffic Flow Map using 1989 average daily traffic flow on collector streets in-your general area. (Dashed lines indicate collector street.) (B) Four page SUMMARY on the report prepared by Dennis Eyler, Transporta- tion Engineer from the consulting firm of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. (Copies of the complete consultant report are available at City Hall.) (C) Existing Condition Map for your general neighborhood. (Please note that traffic volumes underlined on this map are real average daily traffic counts and the remainder are computer generated from a computer model that is used in developing traffic flow projections.) (D) Figure 9 Traffic Diverters - Pattern D which is the consultant's recommended pattern if the City wishes to divert traffic from the neighborhood. The consultant will make a detailed presentation at the February 3rd Council meeting. As you will note when you read the attached material, the primary issue is whether any alteration to our street system is warranted to attempt change in traffic flow patterns. The Edina City Council, Edina Traffic Safety Committee and City staff have not taken a position on this report. The purpose of the Council meeting is to involve the neighborhood in the decision making process prior to any final decision on this issue. Comments on this report should be directed to the Edina City Council at 4801 West 50th:Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. Sincerely, O Francis J. oE. Director of Public Works and Chairman of the Edina Traffic Safety Committee FJH/c1 -f -- �- - -- City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (6121 927 -5.161 ^ 1989 CITY TRAFFIC FLOW COUNTS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC lip! SOUT. on To memo MIRR LORD 2RQv&_, All Lft LA Is ARCTIC Am I 1000 7s 77. CIO LA LA iq LO'S LA TR OUR P4.ull 's C. "of st BRAEM PAM SRFSTRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ PARKING ■ LAND SURVEYORS SRF No. 0911592 December 6, 1991 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 , RE: TRAFFIC STUDY TRACY AVENUE - WEST 66TH STREET TO WEST 70TH STREET Dear Mr. Hoffman: As you requested, we have completed a traffic study and analysis of the Tracy Avenue neighborhood, generally' between West 66th Street and West 70th Street. Based on this traffic study and analysis we offer the following comments and recommendations for your consideration: INTRODUCTION This study was completed in response to neighborhood concerns for the amount of "through" traffic cutting through the neighborhood on Tracy Avenue between West 66th and West 70th Streets in the City of Edina. The study area.is generally the neighborhood bounded on the north and east by Nine Mile Creek, on the south by West.70th Street, and on the west by Valley View Road and Antrim Road (see Figure 1). EXISTING CONDITIONS City staff has previously documented that there is a significant amount of "through" traffic using Tracy Avenue as a short cut through the subject neighborhood. The staff's conclusion that this "through" traffic is primarily travelling between the Crosstown Highway interchange with Tracy Avenue and the Edina Industrial Park, is reasonable. This "through" traffic is cutting through the neighborhood primarily due to the congestion and delay that exists on the Crosstown -- Highway and -- Highway - 100-.- --- - - -- Suite 150, One Carlson Parkwav North. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55447 612/475 -0010 FAX 612/475 -2429 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 2 - December 6, 1991 Based on a cordon count of the neighborhood which was completed by the city 'in early October 1991, there are 5,770 vehicles entering or exiting the neighborhood daily (the counts were adjusted for daily, and seasonal variations). The estimated 320 homes within the neighborhood would only generate about 3,200 daily vehicle trips, based on the I.T.E. average daily trip rate of 10 trips per household. The difference of 2,570 trips per day is a significant amount of "through" traffic cutting through the subject neighborhood. This "through" traffic is primarily cutting through the neighborhood on Tracy Avenue. However there is "through" traffic on other neighborhood streets such as Limerick and Hillside Lane and Galway and Brook Drive, as well (see'Figure 2). STUDY ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY It was. assumed that there are no improvements which could be easily implemented within the near future that would improve the operation of the. Crosstown Highway or Highway 100 which would also help reduce the neighborhood "through" traffic. It was therefore also assumed that the "through" traffic would need to be diverted from the neighborhood streets to, the collector streets serving the study area. These collector streets were assumed to be Valley View Road, Antrim Road and West 70th Street. It was also assumed, that a significant increase in traffic volumes on these collector streets was acceptable.to the city and it's residents. A computer model of the study area/ neighborhood roadway system was developed using the CARS (Comprehensive Assignment and Routing System) micro - computer program. This computer model was used to test the identified alternative actions or neighborhood traffic management strategies. IDENTIFIED ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The identified alternative actions which were tested are listed as follows: o An alternating pattern of stop signs on streets with- a significant amount of "through" traffic (see Figure 3). Poor stop sign compliance should be expected. o A series of multi -way stops along Tracy Avenue from West 66th Street to West 70th Street (see Figure 4). Poor stop sign compliance should be expected.- Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 3 - December 6, 1991 o Improving the collector streets by changing the geometrics at the intersections of Valley View Road at Antrim Road and Antrim Road at West 70th Street (see Figure 5). o Installing various patterns of_ traffic diverters within the neighborhood (see Figures 6 through 9). o Closing Tracy Avenue between West 66th Street and, Hillside Circle, and between Brook Drive and Mc Guire Road, and closing the intersection of Brook Drive and Hillside Lane (see Figure 10) . Two - identified alternative actions were not tested because they involved regulatory traffic restrictions that require a prohibitively high level of police enforcement to obtain acceptable levels of compliance. These alternative .actions are listed as follows: o Turn prohibitions by time of day at the intersections of the high "through" traffic neighborhood streets and the study area collector streets. o Short one -way street segments on the high "through" traffic neighborhood streets. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION AND FINDINGS Two of the identified alternative actions tested would be effective in diverting the "through" traffic from the neighborhood streets" to the collector streets. Both of these actions involve installation of traffic diverters within the neighborhood (Traffic Diverter Pattern B - Figure 7, and Pattern D - Figure 9). Significant changes in the travel patterns of the neighborhood residents will result as well. Both of these traffic diverter patterns virtually cut the neighborhood in two. Pattern B cuts the neighborhood in half at West 68th Street and allows no movement between the north and south halves. Pattern D cuts the neighborhood" in half diagonally form northeast to southwest and allows no movement between the southeast and northwest halves. Current neighborhood street-planning principals would not provide the "through" streets that exist in the subject neighborhood. The installation of traffic diverters would retrofit the neighborhood to be consistent with current neighborhood street planning principals. Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - 4 - December 6, 1991 The cost to construct permanent traffic diverters at the required intersections is roughly estimated at $10,000 per intersection, or $40,000 for Pattern .B and $30,000 for Pattern D. The other identified alternative actions tested did not result in effectively diverting the "through" traffic" to the collector streets. They either did nothing 'to change the existing pattern or only shifted the "through" traffic to another neighborhood street. RECOMMENDATIONS Should the City wish to implement a neighborhood traffic improvement project for the study area it is recommended that Traffic Diverter Pattern D (see Figure 9) be selected. Due to the significant change in the neighborhood residents travel patterns and the costs for the permanent traffic diverters it is recommended that the plan be implemented on a temporary /trail basis and then be monitored. The traffic diverters could be temporarily constructed using' Type III barricades. It would be helpful to also install advance signing on, the collector. street approaches to the neighborhood advising the "through" motorists of the change in the street network. Experience shows that once the traffic diverters have been installed, and the "through" traffic problem is no longer present or visible to the neighborhood, all that remains are the traffic diverters which continue to be an inconvenience to the neighborhood. After time the neighborhood often requests to have the diverters removed. It is possible that the temporary traffic diverters left in place long enough could break the "through" traffic pattern. The temporary diverters could then be easily removed, returning the neighborhood street system to it's original condition. Another consideration is emergency response time will- be increased- for emergency vehicles responding to a call fore assistance within the neighborhood. zt� CO y,, a I yi = pRG`f 9� c OR. -� RD. WAY > �iy J W kw - WHIT 371 i W I AI � GI �u DoR tXl�ilJ4 �,10P 51l�U. 0�9 a w 64TH ' • x15 ?11J1s Yt '�iLsll. 9 0 o -- D�1[:Y�TFfi�- V6LL�GiI✓. cr. -=-= s�C611Di�Y "TIaP.�CY�•l+ P1)()TFi. �J c �o `t. L S p Ito a - C—. 1125 66TH 1 ST LOW i ,GRACE J w, 6 au VI J� T 1 trj �% I °� a 57� A LA. J S- A Z76 2b 1 6 abe JP`'�'� SUSAN AV ac 1540 x Z30 19C j 70 v % w. 68TH i x J I ST. ' CHAPEL Qq. 3 166 Lo00 1 140 a _. , 144 `' 440 Z56 `io BROOK np 510 O c NE ° w z w 69TH ST. Zon s Oft. 'P polo � ; 44� - ERIN 1 1 1= wtCGU(RE R0. (o ?b , CREEK- 4 a 3 110 17-30 70 VIEW LA. ckcio WEST 70th 'rEq o i Uc� O VILL i1;GE _ Ry Z Z J �4CLE l OR.. o> Z � 4h gbft- t,a•1oe U4X uo_Wft-, KOM ALL a?NtXb stal 03N1"kZ !" V .. - - srRCAR- RCSCOE- FAUSCH, INC - CITY OF EDINA FIGURE �XISTIIJG C�lJdl1 lL�l1S 2 sRF NO. 09zM2 - TRACY AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY � WI OHO �t^yJ` a I I WAY )�S J W WI A - YI►H I T �! I I' m all l.Ci�Yilit% OOR C Z I � • � t �,Xl'�I11J4 �1�P ��i.�U 0, � w 64TH 90 a � ' �XlSTIuLt `{tC,1.� SILsLJ . MoveL i LC11ST V ALLE-i LA. Cc Q ° LOCA'Tw Cp Imm\jemal . ~ , • �„ �" �p — = 5EC0►,1G�`{ �.?l�P�(Y�U" �dU ?�. (,100 H� s '� F \ �E RD _ 1�0�0 0 1Z0 c Y .►P� /�' -716 w 66TH ?j0 11 � j SZOb I � 3 ,G R CEO Zoo / I 220 J w �I TER. ' a 3 YTH 1 LOI S LA. Z50 Z E,{ I(o0 ' I ZD 9� V Y SI10 `IPA SUSAN AV u ZSO 2(00 a �_ 68TH ST. J CHAPEL 04. > 436 146, 190 I 196 c BROOK 53O O �I s A N E 2 I (.O J �ii�P � � w 69TH ST. 330 ac 8 OA• c (030 j ERIN 480 MCGUIRE R0. 430 Z v CREEK 4510 SIO u 6w SD W VIEW LA. W T i 70th � - - r �•' cc^^ r77S0 VILLAGE Z 'QY Z a 4LlE't OR. STRQU- ROSCOE- FAUS0i, NC CITY OF EDINA � h FIGURL SRF CONSULTING °N� Twic s - �,�t�u n 9 SRF NO. 0911592 TRACY AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY January 28, 1992 To: EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Bob Sherman Alison Fuhr cc: Fred Richards Ken Rosland Peggy Kelly Jane Paulus Jack Rice Glenn Smith Re: Q&OF THE TRACY AVENUE STUDY/RECOMMENDATION We wish to submit the following petiton for your consideration. Thank you, Residents in the area of the Tracy Avenue SRF Traffic Study PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE 'TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed. to any changes that- would divert traffic from the current and long . established patterns-and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street ; or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name i f Address 1�o �'w ��� 7 #dtj,�� 617 4;t PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and- are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name �ao 00 0� �ckrk-5� Address,, i' I I , i, W PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name i i i /�z r � Address 6713 41446ww9ylk 4 J( fl ra:�� -'.�� UN odor TOM • 441-1-LY/`bizc; /'611, 1- 1 7 PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally - residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Address G 7a y L ,.��/ cI <<z F' d 7 i vn e r I c K &4'E-4— LT11Si —T 7/ PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View,. Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name �� k-C" Anq-� Address I\ G� �70, T Nil L4 ; ��. luuu) -, 020 Ifs LLSr0L- Gw. 66/7 M afii. PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name ,) c, � Axzt� 44:�� Address /1A so • t. 7 L 5Xd (o I ( i, PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, .Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name MCI Address t �t 1 t PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Nam r+ 1 Address �oct m4c Ale- F-I . 6 i r- i Address �oct m4c Ale- F-I . 6 i r- PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE .TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name Lai Hrw )� Address 6 6 ssn� lie G6'� rya s71 2 al, ?d -1W �-71Zw- �,7 0/ or s9oa 70 �' . s-50sx tj � 6 "'. PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic . study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes. that would divert traffic from.the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must 'not result in any further diversion of traffic into_ a totally-residential area. Instead,_ a proposal that -deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley -View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th: Street , or seeks a solution closer, to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name Address s (A) 7 si AU _ �g 1 PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion - within our neighborhood. must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name r .n J I Address '56'�q' N ct l� r � � --' 0° W. 6 L K o- S3nv w b&' S � . PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of .the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , We contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within-our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th - Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name r, Address PER��� i 5568 CJ, PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners. living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name Address S-4 13' 9,Z a /< 'P" 521 :7 Nce, GU ► ►�e. PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. . Name Address • ,�. F. S I Zq Sms Ari kvs 5-733 Skxs� A-�,) � X33 SHS9 � !-} ✓�. January 26, 1992 EDINA CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Messrs: Fred Richards, Mayor Jack Rice Glenn Smith Ms: Peggy Kelly Jane Paulus cc: Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Bob Sherman Alison Fuhr Ken Rosland Subject: Tracy Avenue Traffic Study We have been Edina residents since 1955, and have been at our present address on Galway Drive for thirty -two years. Before selecting the lot on which to build, we consulted several times with Mr. George Hite, who was then with Edina City Planning. Mr. Hite assured us that this would remain a strictly quiet residential area. As you are probably aware, this area is known as "The Heights" and it has many hilly approaches and winding streets which we like, but certainly could pose problems for additional volume of heavy through traffic. In particular, Galway Drive begins at 66th Street with a hilly incline, is curved and only two and a half blocks long. The Tracy Avenue Traffic Study considers proposed change not to a new development, but in an established thirty -five year old residential neighborhood. Our decision to build and live on Galway Drive was made only after reviewing several points including traffic, neighborhood development plans, zoning, etc. prior to buying. We don't see why we should now be penalized by disrupting a long established neighborhood setting with long established collector streets and thoroughfares. We have also conducted an independent study that shows the housing density per one- tenth mile along Tracy Avenue between Valley View and 70th Street is much less than on other streets involved in this study. In effect, if any changes are made, many residents in our community will be inconvenienced out of consideration for a few who most likely did not research their home purchase in advance. At a January 23rd meeting of concerned neighbors (eighty present), the overwhelming consensus was to leave the existing traffic patterns and conditions in our neighborhood as they currently are. Any changes would result in inconvenience or increased traffic on our very quiet street and will ultimately reduce property values. We also find that the computer projections from the SRF study of existing traffic on Galway Drive at 630 cars per day to be grossly overstated and unrealistically high. One final point, Tracy Avenue is a designated cloverleaf intersection with the Highway 62 Crosstown. This in itself indicates that Tracy Avenue is recognized not only by Edina, but also by the state as a 'through' street. At no point along the entire route of Tracy Avenue is traffic allowed to enter Tracy from the adjacent feeder streets without observing posted Stop signs at all intersections. We ask that you take the points addressed in this letter under consideration prior to the February 3rd Edina City Council meeting and strongly urge that you not disrupt our neighborhood and to simply leave the current and long established traffic pattern as is. Sincerely, Helen Deshler / Kevin Deshler / Ann Deshler 6621 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 941 -1982 December 15, 1991 City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Re: Traffic Study Tracy Avenue - West 66th Street to West 70th Street Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: We, the residents of Tracy Avenue, have reviewed the study completed by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc., and have decided that the recommendation they have given you - Traffic Diverters, Pattern D, exhibit 9, would equitably solve the traffic problem that exists on Tracy Avenue. We strongly urge the council to seriously consider this as a viable solution to our traffic problem. This problem exists today because of decisions made to permit industrial park development subsequent to the planning and design of our neighborhood development. The solution is equitable, preventing traffic flowing into the neighborhood East of Tracy Avenue. The council has acknowledged that we have a legitimate problem, and has rejected the previous requests for the installation of stop sign(s). This solution is the result of a recommendation made by a consultant you have selected. Therefore, we insist that it be seriously considered by the council, and action taken on it as soon as possible. Respectfully, The residents .of Tracy Avenue The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the findings of the Strgar - Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic study: Name Address Home Telephone �)U Jo/- (N1oni G7 o s- 6,72 tA 13 Tracy U G 94 --U 10 The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the findings of the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic study: Name Address Home Telephone S V sue_ 23s6 x'70/ GD /-S OiLA' i Z / rA 1� 7e) % TAw 6i Q�� Ursa -197S6 The undersigned residents of Tracy Avenue, hereby support the findings of the Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. Tracy Avenue traffic study: Name Address Home Telephone c29- 7.s-sg cif INTERLA.CHEN COUNTRY CLUB 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 TEL. (612) 929 -1661 January 17, 1992 Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Matters regarding the traffic study on Tracy Avenue. To Whom It May Concern: We feel that, with the heavy volume already created as a result of both the junior and senior high schools adjacent to Antrim and Valley View Roads, and the traffic "flow through" between our neighborhood and the Industrial Park (located between 70th and 78th Street off of Cahill Road), any re- routing of traffic would be more than our area could absorb. Please give this serious consideration. Sincerely, % 'd Bill & Kidd 6824 Antrim Road Edina, MN 55439 lVk /oe' oe rI MA 11127 4i:' 2/. �. d•Jt y 't � < < •Y PV,, TG �- �t .- f' da L.ttd:�e c iaf L 1.7 /Cic+se X14. li✓z t7 -t /✓iGc�. 4ue� T�rof� 0771 >` • r �.4 rc J ao� d C � �r 'c%c. / a•r w Gt• t �7(rr<:: f � � `'�— �ir ifs- ��: ✓... � 7`- Gid�acGe:i2,f� �fpuiGLL/" �O�V �Kt :<�i,De�fG/ L✓`u��`O' �Ct� Ge/i7t{' '� /S �y M?6��+r5• ��- , .�C:c:�'ff � •f�csz. �,Jl �i'f i ✓t: O•� y� /sdc� �i•vc�/c�L/ (.��ii /� �"'�lcrf� � <[`cifC ✓��„✓ �jucl Cil%!7� 4w •� cl.� .S7`*'r °� /c't "�-3f /:wA::ll //i /e —�j /7' E/i 70 �. ,f�is+cc "14 w� ✓/d .�.�/ �..� /may /�re�� csc.i- C 2L� C C r e 1GJ CC/W- /`.-+2I/ 9Ci-'d -G fF?+�lr s e c •t%eG •. �/cJ r/ HK �'SSZfr /J 4,)z: tr..IC:��. 7`!i A "//e Ar erN S/ _7 ;o &&,j er mad A%ov -,41 7-) rJff•e -e ;i" et 7`' jai` y. %/ �L�.�7`i1`r �kc � %w ���� c t� �.: '�c /, +i :+•17�r ���+I� r.� j•!� a /•c�r�l I` Lr�� ` flr c ..� LAC /r.. l.u/ �sa /c .1�' a Af q%�• ',�iF.: .[ �/.•/ %.• � i •• / +•- / � � � f✓G � CL.� >L'f G� l /`' Lac' L>� Sl'li7�t!/LH / /J1�� Al It z //y/ %`b�f rd z/ 41 /� tcllf c/p.d' '� L✓hc -� C�•, /vt'.y uJt••�e.1T �cr✓ .�s� 70;6.. �� C_ X' t :.+ /t �c cJ �5 � J`pyJ C� L� ✓s �: t 6!r y y / / �i • Tm�.t �" ' 7Z4 'tC '�3 M't' y � � �t .S7r:�,� .S /S .r Lc) •� /i,�Li7LC1'_. �.r+'f c ✓ /f•� /' 0:.. 7�C ��cc�.•as�r. -y cI /`:.Li7'�i /`s °7+� /c.. � tf.� Zt(e� /f y/ 1JC 4: /'•Y rye/ irao� � /�vc:- ST'rd 3'g .r eu..�r > /e..cZ .3 /'1,.,., /x! �jn F,,r�Jc•�f. /-,� / Tom' 3/ U✓C s'v•�e% �':n.�0/2 'ssJLV.- 7� /we- :S!`�c C:r.�..74ac� i9�'C✓ ii /�+g �y.tC.I� �!I' �� �117/P�" .��vsi�l 4r`c r.' _ rod / c/ �j � tliiJ / •senc Zll� Is 2 c7�e /! /� / GC/a.• er c�i /%lac .► .00 t I�Ej� o/r►� f .�i.rcE Wt Lizve Jr.e �eaJL g'^o+✓ /�i I K 1`�<' 4 �f / / /LG Q.ri� Glr;f �s)T .S�.+ccf �,..ca G.•/�!/ al f%• �/isv /o►l� �,y0 +C' �`.�. �v,i �as�f %�r:'Z f rr.♦ / +le rfe� / 604 Cahill Poad Edina. NAN 55439 January 19. 1,992 "; na City Council +01 west 50th Street =diva. MN 55424 =e: Tracv Avenue - west 66th Street to West 70th Street ,c:nc!i Merrb -s. e sTongiy oppose acomion of sne measures suggested by the Decemoer 6 1991 of 5RF - onsuiting Engineers regarding the traffic problems of west 65:h -01.-eet tc V st 70th Sleet because: ;1] Access to Highway 62 `cr those residents living on Hillside. ! mer!cK and Cahill Road wiil be verb; inconvenient. This is particulariiy true for those of us iivinq between 66th and 68th Streets. The time and distance required to gain access to Highway 62 is approximately tripled. '2] The re ;u!red time for emergency vehicles to reach our i►nmed!ate n- e!ghhorhCod is sureiv. in=creased substant!ai!v. suggest tl':at cCnslderat!on De given to: -- i 11 Making ?Pie tar ^ye roaaways aireaey in existence on 'Nesi 10th, Alnmm, . and Vaiiey View serve their !ntenced purpose in carrying the bulk of the rusn hour traffic by removing the stop signs on these roads which are now aiscouraging their use. (2] Placing stow signs on smaller streets to discourage their use for "",rough" traffic. 31 Strict enforcement of speed and stop sign compliance. -panic you for your consideration. Sincereiv. January 20, 1992 6613 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55439 Dear City Council Members, Our family is writing to strongly protest the proposal to use traffic diverters to change traffic flow in our neighborhood. We do not wish to have our streets blocked by traffic diverters, whether permanent or temporary. The following are some specific reasons why we dislike this proposed plan: 1) Pattern D. the consultant's recommended pattern, would limit access to Cahill Road between 66th and 68th, so that the only way in or out would be from 70th Street. This would add at least 5 minutes to emergency vehicle response time. Since this block is backed by Nine Mile Creek, 1 think we must consider the fact that an extra five minutes in response time could mean the difference between life or death for a drowning victim. 2) Our main way out of this neighborhood is 66th Street to Tracy Avenue. We object to having streets blocked that we use many times daily to reach our own house. 3) We have a child attending Creek Valley Elementary School. This blockage of streets would also add to the length of time she would need to ride the bus, since the bus would have to wind around to pick up children. It may even be necessary to add another bus route in order to pick up all the children. We probably would not object to the use of additional stop signs to slow down traffic which would like to use this area as a thoroughfare. We definitely consider it to be a residential area, where slow and careful driving should be the norm. Perhaps we should use the money saved in traffic diverters and consultants to have an extra police or safety officer to patrol the streets to enforce existing speed laws and stop signs. Again, we strongly protest any use of traffic diverters in this neighborhood. Please listen to the voices of the residents, rather than your consultant. Sincerely, Eugene and Penny Kranz Annette Grosse 6601 Galway Drive Edina, Minnesota 55430 1 -25 -92 - Lear 14r. Hoffman: I attended the meeting at the Lutheran Church last night, ano am one of the huge majority .hat is strcngly against any changes in the traffic patterns in the Trac-r, Galway, etc. area. I firmly believe it wculd only cause more problems. I sincerely, hone you will agree with this grnUD (and the many others., and that no changes will be made. Sincerely, Annette Grosse .� ;a,&)^.����y�deq��� � e i l Paz i. January 22, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Review of Traffic Report Scheduled for February 3, 1992 City Council: My family and I are residents at 6717 Galway Drive in Edina and we wish to express our opposition to the Consulting Engineers' recommended Traffic Diverters - Pattern D as a solution to rush hour traffic on Tracy Avenue from West 66th to West 70th Street. The diverters would cause difficulty in commuting to work, shopping, deliveries, add to visitor frustration, and an unappealing traffic monument. It reminds me of driving in Seville, Spain where diverters and short streets caused us to hire a cab to lead our car out of the maze. We recommend that the streets be left as they are. January 27, 1992 To: Edina City Council Charles F. Wilharm 5601 Hillside Court Edina, Mn. 55439 I am writing to express my opinion on the proposed plan to change the streets in my neighborhood because I will not be in town on the 4th. of February to attend the hearing. I am strongly opposed to the proposed changes. I do not believe that I should be inconvienced by not being able to go South on Hillside Lane because someone else is complaining that they have too much traffic in front of their hone. I do a lot of walking in the area in question and I do not believe that there is that much traffic to warrant such drastic changes. I have seen those street dividers in Southwest Minneapolis and I think they look terrible not to mention the inconvience they cause. I also wonder if the changes would cause delays in epmrgency vehicles reaching hones. I can't believe that our public officials in Edina would spend the tax payers money to even write up and mail out such a ridiculous plan. Sincerely: • j anuary 1992 Mr. Francis .3. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works Chairman of the Edina Traffic c=ommittee City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear .Mr. Hoffman Everyone to whom i have spoken about the planned construc- tion of diverters in our neighborhood has his or her own reasons for opposing them. in our particular area it is the incredible inconvenience it would :ause us. My nearest neighbors on Hillside l-are would have to travel -i-2- miles more than thev presently do to get to r..he Cross Town Highway. This is also the added distance required for an emergency vehicle to get to their houses from The Fire Station. i and my neighbors on the other side of the planned diverter would have to Travel an extra mile to get to 70th :Street if we snake our way through the neigh- borhood and .75 mile if we so around on Valley View and Antrim. Finally I would have to drive 1.6 miles to drive from my garage to my front door. Our immediate neighborhood would be divided down the middle. No one, including the residents on Tracy Avenue who origi- nated this action could possibly profit from it. Any reduction in rush hour traffic on Tracy Avenue would ba more than made up for by the local traffic added by the Travel required of the area residents. The truth is �there is no reasonable action that can be 'aken in our neighborhood that will improve the traffic there. ask that the City of Edina do the right thing. That is, leave things as they are. s Sincerely yours, E. Keith Betz 6600 Hillside bane, Edina, MN 55439 January 23, 1991 City of Edina Attn Mayor Fred Richards 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55424 Victor Bodnia and Barbara Bodnia 6709 Hillside Lane Edina, Mn. 55439 Re: Traffic Rerouting Tracy Avenue Dear Mayor Richards, The purpose of this letter is to express my opposition to rerouting and or detouring traffic from Tracy Avenue to Hillside Lane. I sympathize with the people living on Tracy Avenue; however, it was their responsibility to investigate traffic patterns when they decided to buy on that street. My opposition to the rerouting including alternative nine is as follows: o It would be a major problem for us to have any temporary or permanent blocks on our street to reroute traffic. We would experience significant time and expense over a long period (added gas and time) just to leave our neighborhood. If what the consultants say that the average trips is 10 per household per day, one can add up the added expense and especially time. o We have four small children and would not want to any more traffic on our street than we already have. A positive spin to the rerouting would possibly decrease traffic on our streets but at what expense. o We have some elderly persons living in our neighborhood which have needed emergency service. I would think that putting in detours would significantly slow the response time. I would suggest you take the proposals back to the drawing boards and start over again or scrap the idea. One suggestion is to do something in the industrial park area (ie Cahill Road) and possibly detour traffic down there. It is bad policy to inconvenience and change traffic patterns for all the people living in our subdivision for the benefit of say 10 households on Tracy Avenue. I will be at the February 3, 1992 meeting to protest the rerouting alternatives. Sincerely, c� Victor Bodnia cc ran Hoffman Craig Swanson January 24, 1992 Frederick S. Richards, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Res Tracy'Avenue Neighborhood 'Traffic Study Dear Mr. Richards: To impose traffic obstacles and restrictions upon hundreds of residents in order to placate 12 -14 Tracy Avenue households by construction:._ of diverters Would be absurd. Over and above the severe inconvenience is the concern of how such longer it will require for tke fire and life support personnel to respond to emergencies witkin the neigkborkood. Respectfully, Gordon W. Nelson 6712 Hillside Lane Edina, MN 55439 I 1. January 21, 1992 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 -1394 Attn: City Council Dear Sirs: RE: Traffic Pattern Study Tracy Avenue - W. 66th Street to W. 70th Street As a resident in the area, I was struck by two things: 1. Why good money was ever spent on this study (and particularly its recommendations). 2. Great - Traffic problem in one area - just divert the same problem to another area! Common sense will tell you that the traffic migration problem from Crosstown - Tracy - 70th - 100 is the result-of the driving public perceiving that it takes less time to go this route than to continue on 66 to 100. The answer to the problem is not a series of traffic diverters which are expensive and will only disrupt that unique harmony of the neighborhood. I believe that, despite what is claimed by our friendly consulting engineers, that stop signs can work and are certainly more cost effective. (Witness the remarkable change on 70th when stop signs were erected at Tracy). Remember, if the driving public perceives that there are too many stop signs, that driving public will also perceive that the route is too slow and will find another alternative. Stop signs are at least worth a try. i e 1 , James A. Steven 7000 Lee Valley Circle 6713 Limerick Lane Edina, MN 55439 January 20, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 W MMAIM MA M7 MI Please do not ruin our neighborhood and destroy our access streets. This is in regard to Pattern D(Figure 9) the monstrous plan of closing West 66th Street and Hillside that deprives us of (1)fire protection, (2)emergency ambulance service, (3)quick police protection, and (4) a second exit. We are already blocked to the east and north by the creek and park land, now this plan will close all our accesses to the west and north, too. If any catastrophe occurs on 68th Street, we, on the north side are trapped without an escape - ?cute. Be it a plane crash (airport traffic is directly over us) , house fires, a water main bursting, or a gas explosion (witness Chicago on 1/18/92) that involves street blockade or repair we have no exit. In fact, if the entrance to 70th Street if closed by accident or fire, we,in an emergency are at the mercy of fate to excape or obtain help through a devious maze to locate McGuire Road. Our school bus routes, snow plowing routes, mail service, garbage service, taxi service, natural gas, electricity, telephone, and water repair services will all suffer. As it is, we have difficulty routing people to our street with our existing two accesses (70th Street and Crosstown 62). Why are we being persecuted because people on Tracy Ave. won't allow stop signs on their avenue. I do not feel that Limerick Lane or Hillside are now busy streets and I am shocked that we are being shut off from vital services, and subjected to such isolation and abuse (also subject to increased fire insurance premiums) because of our vulnerability to delay (long distance from fire station) or no assistance on an isolated dead -end trap. As "Figure 3 and Figure 4" are not included in the brochure, I question "poor stop sign compliance ", the truth is we need more 4-way stop signs right now for safety. Stop signs at intersections would discourage non - residents from speeding and taking short cuts through the neighborhood. We natives do comply with stop signs. Further, I question who and why anyone is trying to fix something that isn't broken. It would please me if you would reopen 68th Street at Valley View Road, we could use that access, too. If you must block any entrance, may I suggest that instead of making 3 death traps (Hillside, Galway and Brook blockages)that you use.a temporary wooden movable barricade at the point that Tracy and 66th St. jog south(on the lot length where they head south together). Also put up a "For local traffic only" sign before they exit Valley View Road to discourage and warn outsiders that the "trail" is closed. Meanwhile, the local residents will use Hillside Circle or Grace with 66th St. for access to Crosstown 62, our voting Precinct 11, the fire station, and Valley View Road. A "Local traffic only" at the 70th St. entrance of Limerick/Hillside and again at Tracy would channel non - residents up to Antrim, and in time would encourage them to seek alternate. routes elsewhere. Even detour signs could rearrange the traffic flow; please, not the proposed expensive "Berlin Walls" to obstruct our streets, ruin our community, and endanger our lives. Yours truly, eHatl anuary 25, 1�2 6716 Limericx mane Edina, 11�1n. 554 : Lear city .',ouncil: Regarding whether any alteration to our street system is warranted. Fifteen years ago when we were buying our home in Edina, we were informed at that time busy streets are, 70th., 66th, 50th., Tracy, Valley View, France, and 400dale. Our choice was not to live on a busy street or in a dead end. I feel it's unjuit to penalize an intire community with heavier taxes, plus the inconvience to accommodate one street of residents. If the traffic has upset those residents so much and their life style, maybe they should be looking for quiet neighborhood, instead of penalizing a complete neighborhood. To put traffic diverters or a maze would inconvience everyone and if an emergencey in need of a fire truck or ambulance became confused do to the maze and took that extra few minuets to reach that resident, it could mean life or death to that person. just how would you justify that to a family member? Are we really such a group of selfish people that we mink only of ourselves, and don't care now much inconvience we cause for everyonelse involved? ,vhy not add stop signs, speed beariers, reduce speed to i5 m.p.h..and if necessary have an office monitor afew areas durning rush hour for traffice -violators. and give tickets. I am sure a few tickets, slower speed limits, and going over afew of those speed beariers will detour traffice off the side streets. The reason people cut thrc-.ich is they want to avoid stop signs, and any slow speed limits. This would =i15o discourage our car racing up and down the streets in the nice weather at all hours of day and night. All our streets could use afew more stop signs for those speeders that have little regard for children at play. I am :•ery much against putting us in a maze by putting up traffice diverter-s. I use crosstown daily to go to and come from work, and I feel my rights as an Edina citizen have been invaded if you put traffic diverter-, or make our neighborhood a maze and increase our taxes, by putting i:.o diverters which will never come down once they are in place. I strong- -;T feel this problem can be curtailed much easier then rerouting our entire neighborhood and making everyones life more inccnvientant. Sincerely,. �GCS -use- �� anice L. Brantley ACONCERNED zX PAYER isY / p � ' i � li'�iG'�i�tL%� `'U L�� �� —C�� ' 6✓� ^c�Gs�'/�' � %CktCr Ir 1 - , " zwy/ �; �` 6 5720 W. 68tVe� From the desk of ... ANDY WEINGARTNER (612) 540.5519 i 1 &Z, —!C �Z ) �,PJN L 107- cQ1A4 oT�- ifce,� �,� �. D i,tJ >E ;son _ s INS= MIY'?!2' • Minneapolis, MN 55441 j E 17 ��- January 16, 1992 Edina -ity Council 4801 Nest 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council Members: we have recently become aware of traffic barriers being considered for installation in our neighborhood. The reasons for the installations are insignificant compared to "-'ne --nconvience these installations would cause all members of the neighborhood. In order to divert 2500 cars. 3,200 -ars .could be asked to drive around in circles in order to access 70th Street or the Crosstown. These 3,200 trips will ce made by 320 neighborhood residents on the average of 10 rimes per day, day in ana day out. The wasted gas and time this would require is bad public policy. Tracy is a busy street. It has always been a busy street. People who bought homes on Tracy bought homes on a busy street. It s unfair 1:.o ask all other members of the Neighborhood to be inconvenienced to turn Tracy into private street with very limited access. Please reject the proposed " temporary" barriers recommended by the Traffic Safety Committee. This is not a traffic issue. 'Out rather a few resident's preference. The ,,ea: -ublic issue is emergency vehicle access to all ,eisnborhooa streets. These barriers would interfere. 7 ?Sandra and Michael Fox s-801 West 68th Street Edina, MN 55439 944 -7993 2220 Lincoln Centre, 333 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 January 27, 1992 Phone: (612)342 -2882 Fax: (612)342 -2885 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Gentlemen: It is my understanding that on February 3, 1992, the Council will discuss diversion of Rush hour traffic from the city collector streets on to Tracy Avenue from West 66th to West 70th Street. Unfortunately, I will be out of the city on that day, and hope that my comments in writing may be helpful. I drove down Tracy and counted 11 houses that front on that street. I drove down Antrim Road and 70th to the point where it joins Tracy and counted 23 homes. In all fairness, it seems incongruous to direct the traffic in front of 23 homes in order to reduce the traffic in front of 11 homes. The concentration on traffic on Antrim Road will increase by 50 %, the cars passing the stop sign next to the Edina High School. I cannot believe that the engineers could conclude that it would be logical to increase the traffic by 50% next to the school. Our children are under enough dangers of being hit by fast moving cars without increasing the traffic pressure at that corner. The emergency vehicles are going to be hampered leaving the station on the other side of the 62nd Street Crosstown in getting anywhere in Edina. An extra two minutes may mean the difference between life and death. I cannot believe that you would increase the traffic that they must negotiate in order to reduce the traffic in front of 11 homes. I would suggest that you leave things as they are and do what can be done to reduce the rush hour problems occurring on the Crosstown. A letter to the employers in the area asking that they stagger their work hours would make life a lot easier for everyone. The traffic flow through this section of Edina will not be solved by shifting cars within that area. The only permanent solution will be to resolve the rush hour traffic which is flooding Highway 100. Please do not increase the traffic 50% on Valley View, Antrim and part of 70th to make it easier on 11 houses. The way it is now, we all share the excess traffic which is as it should be. Sincerely, Miles W. McNal yl , CL , ChFC 7001 L mham Lcxne, Insurance & Annuities for Business & Personal Plans 5716 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 January 26, 1992 Fred Richards, Mayor City Hall -- 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Richards: I am against the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our neighborhood.. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the neighborhood and make driving difficult for residents. In addition, the fire department has indicated that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency vehicles. The plan which would increase traffic on McGuire Rd does not consider that there is a neighborhood park at the head of the circle where many small children play both summer and winter. Many of the McGuire and Brook residents have moved on those streets specifically to have easy access to the park for their children. I am compeletely opposed to any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. Tracy Avenue has only 12 houses facing on it. All of the proposals would greatly increase traffic to many more households while decreasing it for only these few. Once more, I oppose any change. Sincerely, Daniel N. Phillips 5716 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 January 26, 1992 Fred Richards; Mayor City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Richards: I have carefully read and discussed the proposal for diverting traffic from Tracy Avenue and through other parts of the existing neighborhood. The proposal to place traffic diverters would split the neighborhood and make travel for residents difficult. In addition, the fire department has indicated that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency vehicles. The plan which would increase traffic on McGuire Rd does not consider that there is a neighborhood park at the head of the circle where many small neighborhood children play. Many of the McGuire and Brook residents have moved on those streets specifically to have easy access to the park for their children. I am compeletely opposed to any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. Tracy Avenue has long been the main through street. People have purposely bought on other streets in the neighborhood in order not to have that traffic. We have been able to minimize traffic by trucks and this is sufficient. Again, I oppose any change. Sincerely, Jan T. Phillips Doug and Jackie Davidson 6612 Hillside Lane Edina, MN 55439 January 24, 1992 Francis J. Hoffman, P.E., Director of Public Works City Of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: TRAFFIC STUDY /TRACY AVE - WEST 66TH ST TO WEST 70TH Dear Mr. Hoffman, We are in receipt of your letter regarding the above traffic study conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. My wife and family live in the affected neighborhood, and we want to go on record as being opposed to the recommended traffic diversion pattern "D," and to all of the other suggested possible alternatives. We are also opposed to implementation on a trial or temporary basis. We think that it would be ridiculous to turn the entire neighbor- hood into an Alice -in- Wonderland maze because of somewhat higher than desired traffic on Tracy Avenue. We moved to this neighborhood almost four years ago. A major con - sideration.in our move was the fact that our previous home, also in Edina, was on a busy street. The point is that we moved, we did not try to restructure our neighborhood and inconvenience all of our neighbors just to accomodate ourselves. A major consideration in choosing to live in our current neighbor- hood was the fact that it was an established neighborhood, and that traffic patterns would not likely change. We consider this "retro -fit" to accomodate the 12 houses that face Tracy Avenue to be unconscionable. The people that live on Tracy knew, or should have known, what they were getting into before they purchased their homes. Tracy Ave. is an exit off of Crosstown. You would expect it to carry some traffic. The traffic study admits that the traffic'diverters are an "inconvenience" and that many neighborhoods that have them request that they be removed. The study also admits to the creation of a safety hazard due to increased emergency vehicle response time. For these and other reasons, we are opposed to the changes. ?1n c y, glas Davidson Donald L Madsen 6716 Hillside Lane Edina, Minnesota 55439 (612) 941 'l 340 7anuar fT Mr. Francis J. Hoffir:an P. 'E. Director of Public Wcrks ity _ Edina 1810 W. 50th st. L'1A111C1, 1'l1Y JC'4G4 -1.J. Q.''S Dear Mr. Hoffman: I ie traff is Study and f indincrs that were made recently r, :.r the neighborhood which includes --.ur street Hillside. -Lane_, has certainly generated a Great deal of interest and concern for us as re-sidents. The traffic patterns and levels that exist todav seem to be reasonable Tor this neighborhood and any chancres to the streets that would niter the flow seem totally unwarranted. We have 'Lived in our house for 34 vears and life rur area very much. it has hood access to 70th, to the Crosstown and `.o 494 and * he chances ::at are shown in :i of f i . pattern °:�" woL l d 1� disrupt these accesses and :could divide th& neian-t- rhood. ?lease 'Lave- `he streets as they are. Mv wife and I would like ro ,tronaly voice ,sir 0AP"3it4, -n to am; changes to the neighborhood that would affect a chance to the existing traffic patterns. Please enter our r-osition on this matter before the City Council meeting on February 3, 199:. �incereiy, Donald L. Madsen January 28, 1992 Mr. Fran Hoffman City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman:. This letter is in regards to the Tracy Avenue Traffic Study. I live on Hillside Court and find that blocking off the streets designated on the map you sent out, would be very inconvenient to me. Anyone living in Edina knows that Tracy Ave. is a main street and is expected to have some traffic. The people on Tracy Ave. are fairly new residents and if they didn't know this fact, they should have been told by a realtor or surveyed the area before purchasing their home. There are approximately 11 homes facing Tracy who would be directly involved on the traffic change and many more residents would be inconvienced on this change. As for myself I use Hillside Lane to get to 70th St. and by closing this street off I would have to go out to Valley View to Antrim then down 70th just to get to, for example, I use Lewis Park for my kids, also to get to 494 or Highlands. I also worry about emergencies. If a police officer was on 70th and I was in need of his assistance, instead of taking the direct route of Hillside Lane, he would have to go way out of his way on Antrim to Valley View Rd., which, because of the delay could be to late. So I fully oppose this change and let the streets flow the way they were meant to go. Sincerely, f p Jacki �schuk 5516 H Ct. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 8 CIRESI ATTORNEYS AT LAW ATLANTA 2800 LASALLE PLAZA 800 LASALLE AVENUE BOSTON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -2015 CHICAGO TELEPHONE (612) 349 -8500 DALLAS FACSIMILE (612) 339 -4181 MINNEAPOLIS NEWPORT B E A C H SAINT PAUL SAN FRANCISCO December 16, 1991 WASHINGTON Mr. Francis Hoffman City Engineer City of Edina Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Hoffman: PAUL J. EM MON (612) 349-0612 I would like to communicate to you the concerns .of our family regarding at least one option being considered as a solution to the traffic problem on Tracy Avenue in the area between 70th Street and the Crosstown Highway. I realize that the level of traffic on Tracy Avenue is excessive, and I agree that some solution is in order. I am concerned, however, that a solution which satisfies the concerns of Tracy homeowners may unfairly shift an excessive burden and risk on those with homes fronting surrounding streets. I understand that what has been called "Proposal No. 9" from the consulting engineers involves placing traffic diverters on Tracv Avenue at Brook Drive, and at least one more on Galway Avenue. The projected traffic levels after diversion show Brook Drive traffic increasing over twelve hundred percent (to 630 cars per day) , and traffic on McGuire Road increasing about four hundred percent (to 510 cars per day), while traffic on Tracy falls to 260 cars per day. ,Given the number of homes on both Brook Drive and McGuire, as well as Galway and others affected, and most importantly homes with children, this increased level of traffic is alarming and potentially very dangerous. The traffic reduction on Tracy is admirable and necessary for the protection of homes and children, but any solution taken must be equitable and come as a result of a public process with adequate input from homeowners on all streets involved. It seems that any mutually acceptable solution must involve -a. greater reduction of -the total - -- traffic volume in the Mr. Francis Hoffman December 16, 1991 Page 2 whole neighborhood area, eliminating the non - residential traffic which is merely using residential streets as means to travel to and from the Crosstown Highway. I appreciate your consideration of our views. I would like to become more informed'as to both the process used and the options being considered by the City of Edina for this problem. I would also welcome the opportunity to discuss this problem at greater lengths after I have had the chance to review further information. Please call me at the above office, at your convenience, to discuss further action which may affect the Tracy neighborhood. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Paul J. and,Barb Harmon 5617 Brook Drive Edina, MN 55439 PJH /be LAW OFPICES MESHBESHER & SPENCE, LTD. iH . .. KBESHER - iI I. MESHBESHER '.L M. SPENCE• H. GILBERT '. CLIFFORD R. JOHNSON ••• ORDBY BERGSTROM H K. KORAN . J. BOIVIN•- ).MITTED TO IN WISCONSIN ADMITTED TO PRACTICE :SIN • NORTH DAEOTA Mayor Fred Richards Deggv Kell Jane Paulis Jack Rice Glen Smith C/O City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 1616 PARK AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 (612) 339 -9121 FAX (612) 339 -9168 REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE January 22, 1992 Re: Traffic Study of Tracy Avenue Edina City Counsel Members: MICHAEL C. SNYDER - JAMES A. WELLNER JOHN P. SHEEHY MARK D.STREED RANDALL O. SPENCE HOWARD I. BASS DANIEL C. GUERRERO KATHERINE S. FLOM PAMELA R. FINNEY JEPPREY P. OISTAD DANIEL E. MESHBESHER •• ALSO ADIMITTZD TO PRACTICE IN ILLINOIS I am writing because I am unable to attend the counsel meeting set for February 3, 1992 regarding the proposed changes on traffic patterns around Tracy Avenue. I live at 6700 Cahill Road and would _be greatly affected by the proposals. I want to express my adamant opposition to the proposed traffic diverters. I am quite familiar with these, as I grew up in the southwest neighborhood where these diverters have been placed. My mother still lives in that area and the residents are still upset about the traffic diverters and the disruption of traffic in the neighborhood. (As a side note, the Alderman, who was in office at the time those were placed, was not re- elected.) The traffic diverters are very disruptive to traffic in the neighborhood. The proposed plan would totally cut me off from access to Highway 62 which is my primary route. It would force me to go up to 70th and use Highway 100. I find this extremely inconvenient. It would also increase the traffic at the very intersection of Highway 100 and 62 that is the source of the problem in the first place. I and my neighbors would now be traveling through that intersection to go on to 62 thus, adding to the problem that is apparently the cause of the traffic diverting off of Highway 62 through the neighborhood. Why aggravate the lerlying problem at the expense of'the residents? - - I think that- -stop signs would be the- first -step solution to ST. PA.UL OFFICE: 2600 WORLD TRADE CENTER ST. PAUL, MN .55101 Edina City CounsepESHBESHER & SPENCE, LTD. January 22, 1992 Page Two the perceived problem of traffic on Tracy and coming through the neighborhood. I have lived in this neighborhood for several years now and I frankly, do not see any problem with traffic coming through the neighborhood and diverting off of Highway 62. There may be some increase but it certainly is not of a sufficient level to totally disrupt the traffic pattern in our neighborhood and cut us off from access to Highway 62. Another consideration is the accessibility of safety and rescue personnel. The fire department and rescue personnel are just over Highway 62 on the north side. Their current path to our neighborhood is a very direct going across Tracy bridge and turning left on 66th and coming directly to our neighborhood. With the proposed traffic diverter patterns, rescue and fire would have to go onto Highway 62 through the congested intersection at Highway 100 and 62, south on 100 to 70th and then backtrack through the neighborhood to our neighborhood. Are you prepared to undertake responsibility for the potential emergency response delay? . If traffic through the neighborhood is a problem,the severity of which I question, then the least obtrusive solution should be attempted first. Begin with the stop signs. To write this off as a solution merely because "poor stop sign compliance should be expected" is a poor excuse and does not fit with my experience. Occasional enforcement days by the police will be more than sufficient to insure compliance. Several stop signs in a row would certainly defer me from taking any alternate short cuts off the highway. Stop signs should certainly be tried before the radical step of putting in traffic diverters especially for what I perceive as a minor problem. If this does not solve the problem or reduce it, the issue -could be reconsidered.In any event I still maintain my adamant opposition totraffic diverters. If you have questions or would like to discuss it further, please feel free to call. My home telephone number is 941 -0170 and my work number is 339 -9121. Respectfully, Dennis Johnson DRJ /bjs January 23, 1992 5412 Creek View Lane Edina, MN 55439 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 We have read with interest the proposed solution to the commuter traffic problems in the "Tracy Avenue Neighborhood" of Edina. We have long been aware of this growing traffic flow rate and the high speeds at which they often travel through our neighborhood. Thankfully we are not aware of any tragic accidents that have been caused by this traffic increase. This is especially true as the neighborhood does not have the protection provided by sidewalks. Your actions to solve this problem are warranted and overdue. In evaluating your consultants recommended solution (Pattern D), it seems to us that this solution results in a greater inconvenience to Edinans than to the commuters. This answer not only makes it more difficult to conduct our daily neighborhood affairs, but (as the report acknowledges) increases most emergency response times. It seems to us that a solution which mandates the exclusive use of the areas "major thoroughfares" to gain access to the industrial sections of the city would be more appropriate. Construction (for example) of full or part -time baricades which require exclusive accesses - from Highway 100 and /or Interstate 494 would be a more satisfactorily solution. This would assure that the large majority of the commuters would use the major arteries - which is the principle reason for their existance: This, when coupled with staggered starting and quitting times, would be workable and minimize the effect on the neighborhoods. Please note that we do not consider West 70th Street to be a "major thoroughfare" and should not be included as part of this proposed access system. Yes, this proposal would be more costly that the solution your consultants offered. However, we would suggest that the cost of any solution should be borne by the parties who created this situation and benefit from the use of our streets - the industrial area property owners. This is a cost of doing business-. - - -- -- - January 23, 1992 Page two We realize that the Edina property owners have benefited from the tax base provided by the industrial area and (for the most part) we value their presence. Nevertheless, the city's greater concerns should be for the daily lives of the residents. Asking the citizens to inconvenience themselves, for up to ten trips per day, when other viable options are available, is inconsiderate at best and arrogant at worst. Please solve this problem, but not in away which inconveniences our neighborhood, raises our taxes or otherwise "siphons off" funds which could be put to work for the benefit of the entire community. Sincerely, ryce and Peggy Alexander JANUARY 23, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Messrs. Fred Richards, Mayor Jack Rice Glen Smith Ms. Peggy Kelley Jane Pauly Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and West 70th Street by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Our names are Dr. and Mrs. Wendell H. Hall, owners. We have lived since 1961 at 6609 Galway Drive, Edina, MN. 55439. Dr. Hall was employed on the staff of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center 1948 - 1986. In 1986 he retired as a result of disability and spends the winter (Dec. - March) in Florida, residing at 2381 Sunset Ave. Apt. 310, Lake Worth, FL. 33461. Tel (407) 582 -3265. We understand the Tracy Ave. problem and we sympathize with the families who chose to live there. We strongly object to the recommended changes. They will solve nothing but will create important new safety hazards. Old- timers like us remember the fight in the early 1950's when the Hamm Brewing Co. proposed to build high -rise apartments on the Crosstown near the railroad crossing - we won that time and we do not give up easily. We do not believe your consultants hake actually looked at this hilly area with its crooked streets and sharp 90 turns immediately next to these hills. At one time the area led into "Chapel Hills ". The original farm buildings were situated just south of the present Edina High School - the hills drain into Nine Mile Creek just north and east of the area. This residential area is changing. Elders are leaving its large houses - younger families with numerous small children are buying them. There is a nice playground with space for future park development south of Nine Mile Creek at 66th and Hillside Lane. We have frequently observed small children running across and into the nearby streets. Yet Edina has already re- directed school bus traffic from Tracy Ave. to Galway Drive. This is creating a new hazard. We have twice observed Edina snow -plows become so stuck in drifts on the steep hill in front of our house they were forced to abandon plowing Galway Drive. They easily keep Tracy Ave. open in winter. Often in the winter the only feasible access to Galway Drive is from the south (by 68th or McGuire Road). The proposed traffic patterns ignore the causes of the problem on Tracy Ave., which are 1) increased auto traffic on 70th westbound from Metro office park, 2) the new Ron Clark development on 70th at Cahill Rd. (replacing Cahill school and 3) the new complex of stores at that intersection. Sincerely,, , Wendell H. Hall, MD Muriel H. Hall 6609 Galway Drive Edina, MN. 55439 cc. Ken Roslund, City Manager Fran Hoffman, City Engineer ✓ Traffic Safety Committee William Crawford PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name Address From : BIOPRODUCTS INC. MPLS,MN PAGE 1 OF 2 January 21, 1992 Facsimile Transmittal To: Edina City Council City Hall 4801 West 50th street Edina, MN 55424 From: Trudi Meloche 5820 West 68th Edina, MN 55439 FAX: (612) 927 -7645 FAX: (612) 941 -8758 Dear. Mayor Richards and City Council Members; Regarding the traffic study concerning Tracy Avenue between West 66th and West 70th street currently being considered by the Council, I have the following concerns. The recommendation by Strgar Roscoe Fausch, Inc. to close Tracy Avenue in two places and close Brook Drive in one place would, at best, result in a lot of inconvenience for those of us who live on the side streets off of Tracy Avenue. Since receiving the notice of the proposed changes I have kept a log of our family's trips and was somewhat suprised to learn that we used Tracy Avenue over fourty times in one week. We have tried the alternative route as suggested by the aforementioned study. The extra time and gas aside, we are struck by how many children live and play on the alternate route, specifically at the park between McGuire Road and Brook Drive. The study estimates on Page 2 that our neighborhood generates an average of 3,200 trips a day which ostensibly would be routed past McGuire Park. This problem alone should merit further study, but I have other concerns. As a homeowner with small ehildern, I am very concerned with emergency vehicle response time. Diverting an ambulance through an extra four blocks of curving roads would add life or death minutes to and from the hospital.1 Finding an alternative that would restrict traffic but allow emergency vehicles quick access is preferable. The study doesn't mention emergency access until its last point, but I'm sure most residents would rate it as a priority concern. Lastly,,I have some interest in the proposed rerouting of traffic onto Antrim Road and Valley View Road. While I understand that these streets are the designated "collector" streets for local traffic, they are also_the_streets_ where our nigh- School and Junior High School students walk after school and various activities. Perhaps the study's assumption-that-"significant-increase-in traffic volumes on P01 PAGE 2 OF 2 these collector streets was acceptable to the city and it's residents" (Pg. 2) should be re- evaluated with this in mind. The problem, as I understand it, is that traffic from the industrial park is cutting through our neighborhood to access Highway 62 when they should be taking highway 100 or the "collector" streets. The recommended solution of closing Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive would cost an estimated $40,000.00. Cheaper and easier alternatives, such as turn restriction signs, were not studied because they would require "prohibitively high level of police enforcement" (Pg 3). It seems to me that $40,000 would buy an adequate amount of police enforcement for turn restriction signs and, as with the temporary block -offs, over time the "through traffic pattern" would "break ". Thank you for your time and consideration. (,Ln Trudi F. IKeloche Resident BASF n Albert F. Wise, CLU The Prudential Chartered Financial Consultant Insurance Company of America January 27, 1992 OFFICE: 3585 N. Lexington St. Paul, MN 55126 490.1435 Francis J. Hoffman, Chairman RESIDENCE: 6713 Galway Drive Edina Traffic Safety Committee Edina, MN 55435 City Hall 941 -2634 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 ftdenha/ RE: Traffic Study Tracy Ave, W. 66th St, to W. 70th St Dear Fran: On January 16th, I sent a letter to Mayor Fred Richards regarding the Tracy Avenue traffic study. This was after visiting with you in your office. I am enclosing a copy of that letter along with a copy of Bill Craig's letter to Mayor Richards. On Thursday, January 23rd, a committee meeting was held to discuss this situation. Mary Durben, from the SUN CURRENT, was at that meeting and asked for information regarding comments that I made. I am enclosing a copy of my letter to her. It seems that there are three major alternatives to this situation: 1. Reduce the traffic with signage. The "No Thru Truck Traffic" sign has worked very well. Perhaps a "No Thru Traffic" sign would do just as well. 2. Make it difficult to get through the area with traffic diverters. This, of course, divides the area, is costly and inconvenient for the residents, and could be dangerous for emergency vehicles. It would probably force traffic to go on Valley View and Antrim, which is the only Municiple State Aid Road in this area. 3. Leave things as they are but send the traffic where it causes the least disturbance to the residents. That is outlined in my letter to Mary Durben. I look forward to seeing you on Monday, February 3rd. Best wishes. Si c r y, Albert F. Wise, CLU Chartered Financial Consultant ,mew Albert F. Wise, CLU The Prudential Chartered Financial Consultant Insurance Company of America January 24 1992 , OFFICE: 3585 N. Lexington - St. Paul. MN 55126 490 -1435 SUN CURRENT RESIDENCE: 6713 Galway Drive 7831 East Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55435 Bloomington, MN 55439 941 -2634 ATTN: Mary Durben ftdedia/- RE: Traffic Study Dear Mary: Thank you for asking about information on the traffic study of our area. As I indicated in my comments, I have read all the material and visited with the city engineer, Fran Hoffman, in person. I also talked to Mayor Fred Richards on the telephone and at his request wrote him a letter. I am enclosing a copy of that letter and also a letter from Bill Craig. You can tell from the tone of these two letters why Bill and I both decided to build on Galway Drive. You heard last night about the various suggestions to reduce unwanted traffic through our residential area. It was obvious that nobody was in favor of the traffic diversion suggestions made by the consulting engineer. If things are going to be left as they are, the study I made of the homes in our area would certainly indicate that traffic on Tracy and Antrim causes the least disturbance to the residents. This information is attached. The general consensus is to do nothing -more than use street signs that would reduce unwanted traffic. It was nice meeting you. Best wishes. - Sinc ,) Albert . Wise, CLU Chartered Financial Consultant AFW:avw- u��1 Albert F. Wise, CLU Chartered Financial Consultant January 16, 1992 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN- -55429 RE: Traffic Study Tracy Ave, W. 66th St. to W. 70th St. Dear Fred: The Prudential Insurance Company of America OFFICE: 3585 N. Lexington St. Paul. MN 55126 490 -1435 RESIDENCE: 6113 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55435 941 -2634 Bmdential It was a pleasure visiting with you on the telephone the other day. I am following your suggestion by writing to you about the Tracy Avenue traffic study. There are several reasons why I would not like to see changes in the traffic pattern by my residence at 6713 Galway Drive. 1. We have lived in Edina since 1964. The first 10 years we were at Duggan Plaza, which is.a quiet street and neighborhood. In 1974, we decided to look for a larger home. We carefully looked in the area called The Heights. After a very careful review, we decided not to buy or build on any of the streets that appeared to be through.streets. We felt those were Valleyview, Antrim, West 70th, and Tracy. We finally decided that Galway Drive provided the quiet atmosphere we were looking for. We knew we would have to pay more because of that benefit. It was a good decision and we have been very happy on Galway Drive. _ 2. My wife, Pat, and I walk three to four times a week in our neighborhood. Because we walk three to five miles, we cover a lot of ground. We notice homes for sale in the entire area. We also notice that homes on "through streets" seem to be for sale for a longer period of time than on non - through streets. I understand from personal evidence that homes on these through streets sell for lower prices. It must also be obvious to the people buying these homes that there is heavier traffic.on through streets. Pont Traffic Study January 16, 1992 Page 2 3. I understand that the through streets referred to above are Municiple State Aid routes. I presume that is why they are through streets. To my knowledge, Galway Drive is not a Municiple State Aid route. 4. I have reviewed the traffic study made by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. While I am not a "trafficologist ", it appears to me that any pattern other than the existing conditions would cause confusion and perhaps dangerous conditions, especially for emergency vehicles. Perhaps signs coming into our area from the north and south stating "No Thru Traffic" would be helpful. I understand that a traffic study is only accurate if traffic counters are used in the entire area on the same day. I appreciate the opportunity to write to you. I am sure you can appreciate the concern felt by all of the residents in the immediate area. Our strong recommendation is to allow traffic conditions to remain as they are. • Thanks for your help. Best wishes. Sincerely, Alb)err F. Wise, CLU Chartered Financial Consultant AFW:avw T TRAFFIC STUDY HOUSES PER .1 MILE DISC TOTAL HOUSES 2.8 STREET 14 .5 mile Tracy 3.5 21 Antrim Rd ,6 mile 7.2 2. View Valley .5 mile 36 8.0 Limerick Ln 1,6 3, .2 mile 8.4 4. McGuire Rd ,5 mile 42 11.3 5, Hillside Ln 34 ,3 mile 6, Galway Dr January 16, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 �j Messrs. Fred Richards, Mayor Jack Rice Glen Smith Ms. Peggy Kelly Jane Pauly Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and West 70th Street by Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: My name is William B. Craig, owner 6701 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 For health reasons my winter address until May Ist 1992 is: 57 High Point Circle West, Apt. #501 Naples, FI 33940 Telephone: (813) 262 -5654 I have been an Edina resident for 42 years, 32 years at this present address. As former President and CEO of the Automobile Club of Minneapolis (AAA), I was involved in highway development, Traffic Safety and site selection - building two headquarter offices during my employment of 46 years. In 1959 Mrs. Craig and I carefully selected this lot establishing in advance of purchase certain criteria guidelines. Location is always a prime consideration. We quickly discarded homes and sites in Edina that were within two blocks of the Crosstown right of way, then an open field. Lack of sewers on clay soil, all arterial streets, state aid roads, traffic collectors, were 2 all important criteria, paying particular attention to conditions affecting future growth. "You don't build a home near an airport, commercial area, or a public beach and then complain about the noise or traffic." Warren Hyde and staff were very helpful in our selection process. I take exception to the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch (SRF) Reports for the following reasons: 1. It destroys a quiet neighborhood into bits and pieces. 2.13asically shunts traffic from Tracy to Galway Drive. The school bus route already has been shifted to Galway from Tracy. 3. It will lower property tax values. All the homes (12) on the east side of Galway Drive are on "walk -out" type lots. These are prime sought after properties. I should know, as this is the second home I've owned with a "walk -out" basement and they're terrific. All the west side homes on Galway have the living /bedroom areas facing the street which is not true of Tracy Avenue. The 1992 market value of my home is $223,700 HMSTD and I paid $4,715.34 in property taxes in 1991. Naturally I'm concerned and have to oppose any act by the City Council that will diminish the value of this investment. 4. 1 don't know what the margin of error in the SRF computer model is, but I've been retired for 5 years and am at home during the day. For SRF to declare Galway Drive now has 630 cars /day is in gross error and will be 1350 cars /day under plan 81 How anybody, including the City Council, can accept such a proposal is beyond my comprehension. 5. The SRF study must have been made in their office and not in the field as terrain has not been taken into consideration particularly during the winter months. A. Galway Drive at West 66th Street. (a) A steep hill impassable many times even after plowing and sanding. (b) Southbound cars on Galway can't make it up the hill as there is no acceleration distance for a turning vehicle. (c)Northbound vehicles going down the hill under the same conditions find it difficult and hazardous to stop at the blind intersection at West 66th Street. B. Galway Drive at West 68th Street. (a) Southbound on Galway will not turn right (west) under slippery conditions due to steep grade uphill but continues on to McGuire Road where the terrain is flat all the way to Tracy. Galway Drive residents must have access to McGuire Road. (b) These vehicles also don't turn left (east) as it's hazardous (loss of control) due to steep grade downhill with a right turn onto Hillside Lane under same conditions as (a). C. West 68th Street. (a) Vehicles eastbound turning left (north) onto Galway jump the curb and have hit the fire hydrant under slippery conditions. D. Consideration should also have been given to this area of higher elevation. It is the first obstacle for blowing snow across the nine mile creek lowlands. We have more snowfall and drifting than most other areas in Edina. In conclusion, I fail to see the logic of destroying a fine neighborhood and lowering it's property values because a few residents on Tracy Avenue with lower property values to begin with, a publicly known state aid road, a designated traffic collector since originally platted, now object to the traffic which it was designed for. To me it's the same as buying near the airport and then complaining about the noise. Ladies and gentlemen is this fair to those more prudent when purchasing their homes and willing to pay more for the locations? I urge you to leave the present traffic plan on SRF, Figure as is. The cost to all the 'fected homeowners far outweighs those residing on Tracy Avenue. Thank you, N-�\ William B. Craig _ 6701 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 cc: Ken Roslund, City Manager Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Traffic Safety Committee January 28, 1992 i-1r. Francis Hoffman. P,E. Director of Public Works Edina City Hall -4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 554,214 Dear Mr. Hoffman: I Appreciated you takinq the time to talk with me last week. As you suggested I am sending you a letter describing my thoughts and concerns relating to the question of traffic in the Tracy Ave. neighborhood. Please include it in the packet of information and responses you provide the Edina City Council in preparation for the Feb 4 Council meeting. I have also enclosed a copy of this letter that I would like you to pass Mona to the Consultina Engineer. As I mentioned to you on the ohone. I am concerned about the presentation he will be making at the Feb 4meetinq. I wave a lot of difficulty with his "recommended" changes illustrated in figure &, Thanks aqa i n. �incereiy, ( r Michael Lil is '5809 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 942 -5389 I . •S'y� Letter to Edina City Council Members regarding proposed changes to Tracy Ave. traffic. Dear Council Members: First of all I should state that although I live in the "Tracy Ave. neighborhood" I personally do not have any traffic problem at all. Our street is very quiet. Thats one of the main reasons it appeal led to us three ,years ago when we moved in. Changing traffic patterns can do nothing but create problems for me. Secondly, I have three children and a park accross the street. Putting two and two together I'm sure you can see why the volume of traffic on our road is a very sensitive topic to me. Thirdly, I am sympathetic to the desires of others in our neighborhood to decrease the volume of traffic on Tracy. If we accept the premise that Tracy was never ment to be anything other than a neighborhood collector street then it problably is carrying excess commuter traffic and has been for many years. Finally, It would not be sensible or fair to make Tracy a quiet neiahbornood street by turning my street into a busy one. This is I fear exactly what the Consultinq Engineers recommened proposal -119 would do. On my street, McGuire Road, traffic would increase oy 4001/"0. In this "solution" the City would simply be resuf fling homes on busyer and quieter streets, inconviencing everyone and arbitrarily creating winners ana losers. This would not be acceptable to homeowners who bought on quiet.streets only to nave them then become the new neighborhood collector streets. I have studied the maps created by the Consulting Engineers and I have been observing trafffic on Tracy at rush hour. I think that the problem 1s less severe than stated. Tracy has always carried a fair amount of neighborhood traffic and was always ment to. It is a main collector street for the Tracy area residents. Perhaps a sign or two is the sensible and more appropriate solution. I have heard it suggested a that a "NO THRU TRAFFIC" sign might be appropriate. cont. i encourage the Council to respond in a measured and conservative way to proposals to change Tracy Ave. traffic patterns. For the vast majority of us in this Edina neighborhood there is no traffic problem to be solved. Sincerely Michael Lilia 5809 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 942 -5.389 January 26,1 991 Note: to Consulting Engineers, STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. regarding proposal /recommendation to chanqe Tracy Ave. traffic patterns. Dear Sirs: If the city or neighbors insist that a change is neccessa[y and that proposed figure 9 is basical ly a good plan then I think there should be two additional changes. .1. 1 would propose that McGuire Rd be dead ended at 69th street. This would do two things; First it would eliminate the cut.through temptation for commuters which would certainly incease with Tracv closed and increased traffic on Antrim and 70th. and Second It would ensure that Brook and McGuire would not become the new collector streets or Northern neighborhood traffic going to 70th. I goes the final step in your ithe engineers) recommendation (page 3 of summary) that the entire neighborhood be divided diagonally. 2. 1 propose that' we reopen 68th street at Valley view. with the installation of the traffic divereters the orginal reason for closing this street (that it was a shortcut to Tracy) will be entirely removed. The only traffic that could conceivably benefit from turning on 68th street would be neighborhood traffic. I dont think this would mean a very 'zignifigant increase in traffic to 68th since the only neighbors likely to use it under plan 9 would be those on the southern end of Galway. It would Inowever keep Brook and 69th street from becoming the rather unnatural route for neighbors to take to Antrim /Valley View. All of the these ideas of course assume as do you (the Consulting Engineer.) in your report, that 70th and Antrim are the main routes in our area and that they can and should handle more traffic. Thanks you for your consideration of my concerns. I am sure you understand how controversai and difficult it can be for an established neighborhood to consider these sorts of changes. Sincerely, Michael Lil ja, 5809 McGuire Rd., Edina MN 55439 or 5620 W. 66th St. Edina, Mn. 55439 January 27, 1992 Francis J. Hoffman, P. E. Director of Public Works City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota, MN., 55424 -1394 Re: Traffic Flow Change in Tracy Avenue Neighborhood Dear Mr. Hoffman: We received your letter regarding the proposal for a change in the traffic flow for our neighborhood. We have lived on W. 66th Street since November, 1962 and have seen the area grow. We are opposed to any alteration of our street system ( especially traffic diverters indicated in Map #9.) One of our major concerns is that by blocking the streets mentioned in the proposal is that the response time for the Fire and Rescue Squads would be reduced significantly to a large area of the neighborhood. Again, we are strongly opposed to any changes made to the traffic flow in our neighborhood. Thank you for your time. We will be attending the City Council meeting on February 3. Yours truly, ic'ee4,1- &le' Robert & Deborah Danielsen cc: Fred Richards, Mayor of Edina 5612 Hillside Court Edina, MN 55439 Jan. 27, 1992 Francis J. Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Hoffman: This is in response to your notice of a potential traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood between Tracy Ave. and W. 70th St., the subject of a Feb. 3 review proceeding. Please note the following: 1. The official city map used for this project, and presumably all other city projects, erroneously identifies Hillside Court and Hillside Circle. They are just the opposite from what the city map shows. Presumably this error has been perpetuated for 25 years, since these houses were built. Please correct the official city map and notify us when it is corrected. 2. We are strongly opposed to Pattern D, shown in Figure 9, and are skeptical about all the alternatives. Pattern D will effectively cut us off from the rest of our neighborhood for any vehicular travel. We use these streets to commute to work, to shop in the Cahill -W. 70th St. area and for other reasonable residential purposes. If Pattern D were implemented, we would be forced to add to the commuter snarl on Crosstown Hwy. 62, and we would cease to do business in the Cahill -W. 700--ii -at. area because it would be too inconvenient. in short, no diversion would be preferable to Pattern D. We do not have enough information to comment on the alternative patterns. Yours truly, A" 2� a. David L. Kuhn Janice A. Kuhn January 28, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members: We have lived on the corner of Lois Lane and Tracy avenues for the past 18 years. During this time we have seen the traffic on Tracy avenue grow until it has become both noisy, and menacing to children in the area. We are unable to attend the Council meeting on February 3, 1992, but we would like you to know that we support the recommendation made by Strgar- Roscoe- Faush, Inc.- Traffic Diverters, Pattern D, Exhibit'9. We do not believe that Tracy avenue was ever meant to be the "main traffic route" that it is now. We hope that good judgement prevails, and Tracy is restored to'the residential street it was. Respectfully, i Gayle & Arvy Mack 5701 Lois Lane Edina, MN 55439 941 -3650 fJ /r14 C-)� January 28, 1992 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Gentlemen: This letter is in response to the recent undated letter and attachments thereto from the city - engineer. I built the third or fourth house on Lois Lane in 1963. As you no doubt know, this street is one block long between Tracy on, the East and Valley View on the west. While we were lot hunting, long before we started to build, we were told by real estate people and other Edina friends that Tracy was the north -south throughway .:from Vernon Avenue to 70th St. It was then and always has been! Certainly Valley View carries a great deal of through traffic but primarily that with a destination west and southwest of Valley View. My family may be an exception in that, coming from or going to the crosstown, we invariably take Valley View. If we are going east, however, we always take Tracy. I am strongly opposed to all of the traffic diversion plans presented in the above letter.. The one recommended by the consulting engineers is a repetition of the tremendous mistake made in southwest Minneapolis several years ago. Those intersections have probably received more cussing from motorists and pedestrians alike than any other "traffic solution" in the Twin Cities. Please don't repeat those mistakes in Edina! The people who built or bought along Tracy Avenue knew what they were getting into at the time. This is not a recent phenomenon. The best "solution" to our present situation is to do absolutely nothing. I hope you reach that conclusion. r Yours truly Robert E. Thompson 5712 Lois Lane Edina, MN 55439 5720 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 January 27, 1992 Mayor Fred Richards City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Richards: We object to the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our neighborhood. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the neighborhood in two while making it difficult for residents to drive within their own neighborhood. Plan D that increases traffic on McGuire Rd does not consider the neighborhood park at the head of the circle where many small, children play year- round. In addition, the fire department has indicated that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency vehicles. This could be a potentially dangerous situation. We oppose any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. All of the, proposals would add traffic to existing light traffic streets. Tracy Avenue has long been the accepted through street for neighbors. People who have moved into the neighborhood have considered their purchase. We oppose any change. Sincerely, Linda and John Helland i 5720 McGuire Rd Edina, MN 55439 January 27, 1992 Francis J. Hoff man, PE City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Hoffman: We object to the proposals to make changes in the traffic flow through our neighborhood. The proposal to place traffic diverters would divide the neighborhood in two while making it difficult for residents to drive within their own neighborhood. Plan D that increases traffic on McGuire Rd does not consider the neighborhood park at, the head of the circle where many small children play year- round. In addition, the fire department has indicated that diverters will increase the service time for fire and other emergency vehicles. This could be a potentially dangerous situation. We oppose any plan to change the traffic patterns in the neighborhood. All of the proposals would add traffic to existing light traffic streets. Tracy Avenue has long been the accepted through street for neighbors. People who have moved into the neighborhood have considered their purchase. We oppose any change. Sincerely, .ki p Linda and John Helland i January _'S. i99'_ Council Edina 48011 W. 50th St. Edina. AN 55424 Dear City Council Members: We are very much opposed to the proposed 1:rafifl.c -!.i,-,rArter ­.Lan concerning Tract- Avenue. -.t is also shocking to think how., Man'., ",1'.Z1X UOL.Lars %:vnn -.ipenzz- to ,.;.Lan 1.11is 'blockage .r .iiree ;,eerie W110 bought hol;SIOS ne.:!�nboL%Iood streets Eor so bilsy stxnet. i A•acv Avenue nas W :.­,en . a cus! -3rr,-:Aet zuja -.I ma-..n :.ut- - "i! 1. - - . -t .10US- n C. li:_, i I for . L d. he!-, :--:iopp,in.- for :L' I T01' -e, !: .,rreet and L Jead _ is 1- A :0 7.. iv'r-.L-C.S t:,% Lo wesr­i price %.d-iich vi­ :-ion ;:lina -1. :., . however.- ro .�)ck -i; L t-hn r a A' " I' Ho - bi A :,.retLs arouna Ls would nnvo r-housanas of people dri.yir.-,--- 'making many more. bush- streets where o ,%:amD!e 'rooi; and McGuire. Those -people also bough:. and !.raff.-Lc increased ­.:ii L-r.ad were 1r.) Cie installed. Edina. we are r.roud )Y oilr be a LIT.:;. fI; i tV y , road b-i-­,cks v e r'%. ZO aer*11". :lot. a MA di., - !.no 'OLInc T. (I fi c diverter v. ..a. :Ilall!z ­Lncoreiy. Donna and Da vi ❑ TAL11 III .5000 West i;8th' Edina. MN 5620 W. 66th St. Edina, Mn. 55439 January 27, 1992 Francis J. Hoffman, P. E. Director of Public Works City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota, MN. 55424 -1394 Re: Traffic Flow Change in Tracy Avenue Neighborhood Dear Mr. Hoffman: We received your letter regarding the proposal for a change in the traffic flow for our neighborhood. We have lived on W. 66th Street since November, 1962 and have seen the area grow. We are opposed to any alteration of our street system (especially traffic diverters indicated in Map #9.) One of our major concerns is that by blocking the. streets mentioned in the proposal is that the response time for the Fire and Rescue Squads would be reduced significantly to ' a large area of the neighborhood. Again, we are .strongly opposed to any changes made to the traffic flow in our neighborhood. . Thank you for your time. We will be attending the City Council meeting on February 3. Yours truly, Robert & Deborah Danielsen cc: Fred Richards, Mayor of Edina L _ --_-__-__--_- - - _- , Mayor Fred Richards Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor, I am writing you regarding the Tracy Avenue traffic study conducted by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch. I recently chaired a neighborhood meeting held to discuss this issue. Approximately 80 residents from the affected area were in attendance. Several issues were raised and a poll of the attendees was conducted. I would like to briefly review the issues and results. On the issue of the installation'of traffic diverters, the attendees were unanimous. 80 were opposed to any traffic diverters. and 0 were in favor of them. I believe this is a clear mandate for you and the City Council. Among the issues raised were: - The traffic laws are not adequately enforced. While obeying the 45 mph posted limit, I have been passed twice within the, last few months. Also, some residents reported that NSP trucks are still using Tracy Avenue. - The traffic congestion at Antrim and Valley View is a very dangerous situation in light. of the conversion of Valley View to a Middle School this fal 1 . - When the traffic control lights from westbound 62 to southbound 100 become operational the traffic through the area is likely to increase. - There is significant support for signage such as true speed limit signs (25 mph) and "No Through Traffic ", even if compliance 'is not total. - The primary concern is for the safety of children going to and from school. In summary, the mood of the neighborhood is that there is not a major problem and that, under no circumstances, should the existing traffic patterns be altered. Tracy Avenue has the lowest density of housing_ in the area and, therefore, is the logical route for much of the traffic in the area, a substantial percentage of which originates in the neighborhood. It should also be noted that any system which lengthens the distance that local residents must travel to leave the neighborhood significantly increases traffic levels within that neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration of these matters. Sincerely, De II Smi th 5613 Brook Drive Edina, Mn. 55439 941 -6996 THE Mogp, IAND INN A BENCHMARK O CONFERE E EN ER �1 /9(? z- ,/,0 i 6uov -4's , 7025 Northland Drive • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 • (612) 536 -8300 Al` January 31, 1992 6715 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55439 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and Chairman Edina Traffic Safety Committee Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear 'Mr. Hoffman: With reference to the traffic patterns on Tracy Avenue from 66th Street to West 70th Street, I would like to introduce my comments to the committee. I will be unable to attend the February 3rd meeting because I will be out of town, but I wanted to give you my input. As you will note by my address, I am in the area and will be affected by the possible inclusion of barriers. I am concerned that the barrier proposal will significantly change the traffic pattern of emergency vehicles into and out of our area. Fire, police, and paramedic or ambulance vehicles would incur delays if they had to enter the area with the only access being from the south. Please register my concern with your committee. Thank you in advance for your consideration. I know that the decision will be made in the best interest of all residents in this area. Very truly yours, Robert A. Sandilla RAS:pla co _� ' �"~ - �__.OL January 31, 1992 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and Chairman of the Edina Traffic Safety Committee Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 e Re: Tracy Avenue Dear Francis: With all respect to SRF Consulting Engineers, their selection of Traffic Diverter Pattern D as a recommendation in the Tracy Avenue /70th Street neighborhood is not acceptable. Although the "through traffic" pattern remains a problem, there must be other considerations and solutions before you disrupt the majority of the neighborhood. I suggest you review the following: 1. Enforce the existing laws to keep the NSP, Gabbert and other trucks from using Tracy from 70th Street to Valley View. 2. Add another stop sign on Tracy. 3. Place a "No Through Traffic" sign at the corner of 70th and Tracy and another one at Tracy and 66th (the left turn area). Most of all, we need heightened enforcement of traffic speeds on both Tracy and Valley View. It seems that trucks and buses forget they are in a neighborhood. Page THRESHER SQUARE, SUITE 100. PARK AVENUE ATTHIRD STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415. PHONE (612)342 -2890 Page a. In closing, you could ask the Edina Police to patrol Tracy as well as Valley View and Antrim from 7 -9am and 4 -6pm. With this increased police visibility, we should realize a real improvement. If you wish to discuss further, please call. Best regards, I ' r Ron Counton President PC 0 -4 cc: Mayor Frederick S. Richards RC:dnm:695 REED OLSON �'iNDy 01-50A] b 11-C CA F+i L L A6 EDiNr�, H /nf 5530 66AM 1(DVALei L po sE of 77-lis Lk "r iS 7z s; x, rE vu rL p 0 ooS ri o A< T-b TN-f- TKA-f-F,c D i'v�K �� K - P A-rr6 rcxu L A Av 6 Ai- 79,4,frie D lVE2-1-t-te- PArrr- K V-S 77.,1,4r Y A rrt-- 1-" ;S m a E ak 6s�.� r� m 77Y-4 FAiN,+ er i Y COL)Ate4'L- cn! Z - 3 - cl' Z . lXl f-- bo No r FtF� THAT ANY A[.T-r--,,eA7- 6AI I'S tu0,44RAk)T-9 D , /4-^/d �SPECr'Au.y AIo-r 774oSE w)14-7 �H 04uSE tFXeEsSiL'& /ti(00AI t'KNi ENCE 7`U F�iST7�G flCt- (EDu�n/E,� x,,45 (A rW A) D &,4S. vN 0f TH4 HAIN 96gC01%( S HONE W As /7-5 C CA)L)6nri eA(r I-064,0 1-7'od Av 6 4 L' -SSA 6i L i r y To Ht 6 fiw,4 -t z. ANoTHE,e F4CrVZ TD Co/vSi'tlE� i S TY6 ;Ivoei-45M gAfodNT 61 77M,6 iT u)ou L-a TA41<:,v- TI+E 7�v YEA/LS �Go , we A�A13 A I %2E iAl Du O, 14t N E . to(-- 77tE r 6 tl i �l �rEt� TIfE l/,26 STA-K i kc) 19",6 THEV I,U�,QE A6�E SAUE 0ufZ #69S6, TN E Y 701,6 U5 -R �u 6 H, THAT H,413 Pfg /W,Ci V46 .1 H i^ A) -WA-oe- l-OST- OU4 IgCHE , c�F �E�i E�f Tttt Pieo posm C'�,A�l6ES wou �A AAA A�r ���SiT A�trovivT bf 7irr� 7a mE P ��U DT*f GD/11Si�t%Ct� oN %S 7�tf}T TN"E P,Zo /oSFd PLAN Wou �.►� D�U T T,�A -�Fi oiv� ��oelL REED OLSON A) 1-04 9 t-9- To T?fL TR . AO 6 A�76 H 50,1-lool- do f-(,,0c� x 100E4E S7V6kA(V� ACC4 JeRd,14 T f-,ae y A,06� i s A H -4roP- f x,'r OAF 14761-fwi4y (� Z w� ��c i,Ev�' 7`H6 01'7-7 PI-/A(N ,61t.S ni r�N D E.S d0l-l- e TD4 SM6X I— 6A) l3o7-lf No�if+ 4,(6 Svv7-74- S;/3-4S Ojq 4koy 62 7" oSc 77f Ar P 1 it C 14A s 4 o/J Tip A--r sT���i �' ffovc.� �Uo7- r3E Su�oR i sta Tz� Giti/� T AA r" i T r-0A[CT7'O.4(S 77-f-A7- W AAy . �F ( AMV GoSo�Q PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy, Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought by the Edina City Council. Name i 1 � Aoa� "a� � Address SbD� C--t /� v erl0 /� v PETITION OF THE TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY As homeowners living in the immediate area of the recent Tracy Avenue traffic study, conducted by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. , we contest its findings and are opposed to any changes that would divert traffic from the current and long established patterns and routes. A solution to alleviating vehicular congestion within our neighborhood must not result in any further diversion of traffic into a totally residential area. Instead, a proposal that deals with improvements and restrictions to the current thoroughfares of Valley View, Tracy; Antrim and 70th Street , or seeks a solution closer to the source of the traffic congestion created by the Metro Office Park, should be sought'by the Edina City Council. Name Address t/:2- January 27, 1992 Mr. & Mrs. L. B. Strachan 6617 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Traffic Safety Study - Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and West 70th Street. Dear City Council: We have been a resident of Edina for 40 years, having had our first new house in Edina condemned for the 62nd Street Crosstown Highway - I built the first House in the Heights in Edina. When the industrial park was in the early planning stage we attended many meetings with concerned parents and neighbors about the traffic thru our area and the safety of our children in and around Cahill school, brought on by the added traffic from the then new 62nd Street Crosstown and'the proposed industrial park. In attending these public meetings with George Hite, then Planning Department Hegd, and Mr. Tupa of the Planning Commisssion, we were assured that there would be no access into the residential areas from the the Industrial Park. Others have addressed the disapproval of the Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. report and I will add my name to that report also. I am opposed to dividing the neighborhood into bits and pieces. I recommend block the access between the Industrial area and Cahill Road. Also, put up a "NO LEFT TURN - 7 TO 9 AM" off Valley View Road onto West 66th Street, Grace, Lois, and Susan Streets. Then put a "NO RIGHT TURN SIGN - 4 TO 6 PM" off West 70th Street at Hillside and Tracy Avenue. Thank you, L. B. Strachan 1' �r `V VT,.N r1PN• . a , REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Front: CRAIG LARSEN Date: FEBRUARY 3, "1992 Subject. FINAL PLAT APPROVA PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION, 6996 VALLEY VIEW ROAD, S -91 -9. Recommendation: Agenda Item ; IV. A. Consent Information Only Mgr e Recommends To HRA Approval of Final Plat subject to: Ix To Council Action ` Motion X Resolution Ordinance Discussion 1. Subdivision dedication based on an unimproved land value of $300,000. 2. Execution and recording of attached Development Agreement. BACKGROUND /INFO Preliminary Plat approval was granted for this three lot (2 new) plat at the December 16, 1991 Council meeting.* The proponents are now presenting their Final Plat and request its approval. Lot sizes and dimensions remain the same as those given preliminary approval.. Attached to this cover are the assessor's report of land value and the Development Agreement. Similar to the Development Agreement for Jyland Whitney Addition, the Agreement covers tree removal, retaining walls, and erosion control protection. Copies of the Agreement have been sent to George Borer the attorney who represents Daniel Spiegal, 7104 Valley View Road. Final Development Plan for Burnet Realty, 5036 France Avenue South, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 16, 1991, be and is hereby approved. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Resolution adopted. (� V PRELINrRaBY FIAT APPROVED FOR PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION (6996 VALLEY VIER ROAD) ,141Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. n� Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained that the subject property, located at 6996 Valley View Road, is a developed single family lot with a lot area of approximately 4.6 acres. Improvements on the property include a house in the central portion of the property, a swimming pool directly.south of the house, and a tennis court further south and about 40 feet lower than the ground elevation adjacent to the house. Access to the existing house is from Shawnee Circle via a driveway over a 40 foot wide outlot. The proposed subdivision would create two new buildable lots. Lots 1 and 3 would front on and would have driveway access to the recently completed Bello Drive. Lot 2 with a reconstructed house would continue to be served with driveway access to Shawnee Circle. The 500 foot neighborhood used for evaluation purposes yields a median lot width of 100 feet, median lot depth of 150 feet, and a median lot area of 16,450 square feet. The three proposed lots would exceed the median lot width, depth and area: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot Width 150 feet 205 feet 120 feet Lot Depth 205 feet 370 feet 410 feet Lot Area 38,500 sq. ft. 91,750 sq. ft. 71,830 sq. ft. Lot 3 would not meet the minimum "lot width to perimeter ratio" of 0.10. Lot 3 has a lot width to perimeter ratio of 0.07. Thus, a variance from this standard would be required. No new public streets or utilities are anticipated for the proposed subdivision. The impact of the development would be caused largely by driveway construction for Lots 1 and 3. The proposed house on Lot 3 would be constructed on what is now a tennis court. The new driveway serving this lot would include grades of 108 or more and would require some retaining walls. The proposed pad in Lot 1 would be cut into the hill with a retaining wall to provide a small rear yard. Although the driveway would be considerably shorter than on Lot 3, it would be equally steep. No building plans have been submitted for any of the three lots. Included as part of the proposed preliminary plat would be Outlot A of the Jyland- Whitney Addition. The outlot has been deeded to the owner of the subject property and provides for frontage on Bello Drive. Providing frontage on Bello Drive for the subject property was a condition of approval for Jyland- Whitney Addition. Staff would recommend preliminary plat approval with the variance for lot width to perimeter ratio. The Planning Commission considered the proposed plat at their meeting of December 4, 1991, and recommended preliminary plat approval subject to: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) Utility connection charges, 4) Conservation easements on Lot 1 to maintain a 35 foot setback from the northerly property line and a 105 foot setback from the northeastern point of Lot 1. Presentation by Proponent Peter Knaeble, Ron Krueger & Associates, Inc, reiterated that the smallest of the three proposed lots (Lot 1 at .9 acre) is larger than the largest lot in the Jyland- Whitney Addition. The easements proposed for Lot 1 were based on conversations between the neighbor to the north and the developer to preserve the trees on the north side of Lot 1. Jim Deanovic, proponent, added that they are trying to preserve what Martin Peper wished, which was to make the least change to the existing landscape. Public Comment George Borer, stated that he represented Daniel Spiegel, 7104 Valley View Road, whose property borders Lot 3 of the proposed subdivision. He referred to the concerns outlined in the letter he had submitted dated December 16, 1991, and requested these be included in a development agreement: 1) All retaining walls and driveways be constructed with approval of the City Engineer in order'to minimize impact on neighbors, 2) All trees shown on the developer's plan for preservation be preserved. If disturbed, replacement be done with trees of like kind and size, 3) No further grading ,be done on the property except as shown on the plans. Further, location of building pads not be changed from the proposed plan (Ordinance No. 804, 12 (b)(3) indicates that the location of building pads must be shown on the plans), and 4) There will be no further lot splits or subdivisions of the three lots to be created in the proposed plat. Sidney Rebers, 6916 Dakota Trail, commented that he has no objection to the three lots as proposed but was concerned that the conservation easement would be able to handle the drainage from the subdivision because of the terrain. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards observed that this Council could not bind future Councils as to further subdivision of the plat. He asked the developer if he would consider entering into a development agreement that would address the concerns raised by the neighbors. Mr. Deanovic responded that he would have no problem with such an agreement. Member Rice spoke to the issue of the proposed location of the building pads. Planner Larsen indicated that the setbacks required by the conservation easement would pin down the building pad location for Lot 1. The building pads for Lots 2 and 3 as shown on the plan are the typical and logical locations. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) Utility connection charges, 4) Conservation easement on Lot 1 to maintain 35 foot setback from northerly property line and 105 foot setback from the northeasterly corner of Lot 1, and 5) Developer's agreement: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELMMqARY PLAT FOR PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "PETER ANDREA 1ST ADDITION ". platted by Claire Peper, single owner. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 16, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Resolution adopted. *PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NOS. 1171, 1366 AND 1466 (cALIZAI ) Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: Subdivision No.� ' 7/ SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT T0: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department 1 �L° 1 1 fit'�"►'r'e� SUBDIVISION NAME: LAND SIZE: L/ LAND VALUE: (By: i- /�J/ Date: ✓�S 1/ ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land QB. dedicate V of the land donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be 'a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required II1. In all other instances than above. 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. If ................. ............. ......... IIIIIIII IM 11111111111 HII is if I if I I; Ii. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii l! N 1'04' E S. 4Z No/ Ig Z' 04 J Z 388.07 . .4; LU �7 wl 0 17 A— V44 47 Al IN K N A- Z '34 V7 X00 r ALC I " " , , I P PRELIMINARY PLAT- GRADIAJ4pL R U11; I I v I" fill C gi 40 Z. ME I " " , , I P PRELIMINARY PLAT- GRADIAJ4pL R DEVELOPMENT ACRPRMPNT (Peter Andrea Addition) THIS AGREEMENT is made as of .1991, between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "), and (herein called the "Developer "). Witnesseth, that: Whereas, the Developer is the owner of land within the City - legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Muir Woods, Outlot 11 Overholt Hills Georgia Addition and Outlot A jyland Whitney Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Subject Lot"), and has made application to the City for approval of a plat of the Subject Lot, said plat to be known as Peter Andrea 1st Addition (the "Plat"); and , Whereas, the City Council granted approval of the Plat, on the condition, among others, that the Developer enter into this Agreement with the City relating to the development of the lots (the "Plat Lots ") within the Plat; and Whereas, the parties hereto acknowledge and agree that development of the Plat Lots pursuant to this Agreement, and the fulfillment generally of this Agreement, are in the best interests of the City and the health, safety and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the purposes, provisions and requirements of the applicable state and local laws under which the development of the Plat will be undertaken and completed. Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements herein contained, the City and Developer hereby agree as follows: 1. Street and Retaining Walls. All retaining walls and driveways shall be constructed of such materials and pursuant to such plans and specifications as the City Engineer shall approve in writing prior to construction. Once constructed the then owner or owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat Lot Owners ") shall maintain in good condition and repair such portions of such retaining walls as are on the Plat Lot of such Plat Lot Owners so that such retaining walls are not a hazard. 2. Tree Removal. Developer and all owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat Lot Owners ") agree to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 823 of the City relating to the cutting down or removal of trees, in connection with the development of the Plat Lots. 3., Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Developer and all Plat Lot Owners agree to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 817 of the City in connection with the development of the Plat Lots, including, without limitation, -V0a 8'IdN- 1L3NJLXHA& 1L38M0Gx 7nia 9 0:is0 Z6 *LZ *TO the placing or installation and maintenance of erosion control fences and hay bales as required by said ordinance. 4. Remedies. (a) If Developer, or any Plat Lot Owner, fails to perform any duty or obligation to be by Developer or such Plat Lot Owner performed under and pursuant to this Agreement and does not cure any such failure of performance within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof is given by the City, then the City, at its option, may enter upon the property within the Plat, including any Plat Lot, and any part of any thereof, with such personnel, equipment and materials as the City deems necessary for the purpose of performing such duty or obligation. The City, and its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives and contractors shall have no obligation or liability to Developer or any Plat Lot Owner or any occupant of the property within the Plat, including any Plat Lot,'or any part of any thereof, for trespass or damage to the property within the Plat, including any Plat Lot, or any part of any thereof, or any improvements thereon, or for loss of ,business or business interruption or any other cause, all of which liability and obligation is hereby waived by Developer, and each Plat Lot Owner, and if any person makes any claim against City, or its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives or contractors for lose or damage to property or business due to such entry, Developer, and such Plat Lot Owners agree to hold the City, and its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives and contractors harmless from and indemnified against any loss, cost, damage or expense, including attorneys' fees whether suit be brought or not, arising out of such claim, and to pay to City, upon demand of the City, any such loss, cost, damage or expense, including attorneys' fees, suffered or incurred by the City, or its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives or contractors, with interest at the highest rate then allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of 129 per annum from the date demanded until paid; provided, however, that the foregoing hold harmless and indemnity shall not apply to intentional wrongful acts or omissions, or negligence, of the City, or its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives or contractors. (b) The City, in addition to the remedy at (a) above, shall also have in the event of such failure, the right to revoke or deny issuance of any permits then issued or to be issued for any improvements or development on or of the Plat or any Plat Lot, and shall also have available all other remedies then allowed at law or in equity, or provided by ordinance, or provided by the Developer's Agreement, 2 Sod S'IdLq— .&SN.LIHM &SSM00* pgcl 90 fi0 Z6 'LZ 'TO including the right of the City to realize upon any security given to City in connection with the Developer's Agreement, and mandatory injunction, to enforce any of the obligations and duties of Developer or any Plat Lot Owner hereunder or to recover damages for default therein. (c) All of the remedies available to City shall be usable and enforceable separately or concurrently, and the use of one remedy shall not waive or preclude the use of one or more of any other remedies. Also, the failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any remedy shall not preclude City from thereafter exercising any of its remedies for the same or a subsequent failure or refusal. Meveloper, and each Plat Lot Owner, agrees to pay to the City, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in enforcing this Agreement, including attorneys' fees, whether suit be brought or not, by use of the remedies set out herein or by other remedy or means available at law or in equity and with interest on all such costs and expenses at the highest.rate then allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the dates incurred until paid. (d) Developer also agrees to pay all costs incurred by the City for collection of any monies, including interest, due from Developer, or any Plat Lot Owner, to City pursuant hereto, again including attorneys' fees and whether suit be brought or,not, with interest at the highest rate then allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid. I Notice. Any notice, report or demand required or permitted to be given by any party hereof upon or to any other party hereto shall be in writing and shall be deemed given in accordance with this Agreement when delivered personally to any officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, sent by registered or. certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: If to Developer: 3 90d SZd34- A3H.LIHA& A33H0Q� MCI 90 : i7O Z6 'LZ *TO If to City: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager If to a Plat Lot Owner: at the then address of the Plat .Lot. Notices shall be effective upon personal delivery, or if mailed, one business day after mailing or depositing in the above manner. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in the manner above specified, ten days prior to the effective date of such change. 6. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by, and only by, a written agreement executed by the Developer and by the City. 7. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable as to. any person or circumstance, the application of such provision to persons and circumstances other than these as to which it shall be held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and all provisions of this Agreement in all other respects shall remain in full force and effect and be valid and enforceable. 8. Run With Title: Successors and Assign�Ioint and Several Liability. The provisions hereof shall run with the property within the Plat and with every Plat Lot and every part of any thereof without regard to technical classification and designation, legal or otherwise, and will be binding upon, to the fullest extent permitted by law and in equity, and shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by and against, the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns, and all present and future owners of the property within the Plat and of every Plat Lot, and every part of any thereof. The obligations of any Plat Lot Owners hereunder (if there be more, then one such owner of a lot) shall be joint and several. . 9. Limited .Liability. Each person who is now or hereafter a record owner of all or any part of a Plat Lot shall be liable hereunder for all liabilities and obligations accruing hereunder with respect to the Plat Lot so owned while such a record owner of such Plat Lot, and if there be more .than one such record owner, such owners shall be jointly and severally liable. However, such liability shall cease as to such record owner when no longer such a record owner, except, however, for liabilities and obligations which accrued while such a record owner. The rights and remedies of City under paragraph 4 hereof may be exercised against any Plat Lot Owners only for failure by those Plat Lot ,Owners, and the failure of the Plat Lot Owners of one Plat Lot shall not allow exercise of any remedies by the City under paragraph 4 hereof against the Plat Lot Owners of a different Plat Lot. However, the foregoing provisions shall not prevent exercise of any remedy in paragraph 4 hereof 4 LOd 8'7dH- 1LZN.L3HM A3SU0G* mid 90 : V0 Ze 'LZ 'TO as to the then record owners of the land within the Plat, or of any Plat Lot, for a failure of a then prior record owner of all or any part of the land within the Plat or of that Plat Lot. 10. Upon recording of a specific release of this instrument signed by the Mayor and Manger of the City, this instrument will be deemed terminated, satisfied and released. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written. By Its CITY OF EDINA By And STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF Mayor Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of If 1991, by a on behalf of the Notary Public L� 9 0a S1Iazq— A3X.L1HA& JL3SH0G* rata 90 : V0 Z6 *LZ IT 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1992, by Frederick S. Richards and Kenneth E. Rosland, the Mayor and Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: DORSEY & WHITNEY (JPG) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 F4 Notary Public BOd 3ZdDq- A3H.LIHA& 1L3SMOQ* yqa 9 0: -V O Z6 *LE 'TO polov z ffm I nizill :0�P1 • The undersigned, being the holder of a (the "Interest ") on the property within the Plat as defined in the Development Agreement to which this Consent and Subordination is attached, the document creating said Interest being dated . and recorded as Document No. , in the office of the , Hennepin County, Minnesota, does hereby agree and consent to all of the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement to which this Consent and Subordination is attached, and agrees to be bound by all of the obligations of, and subject to all of the remedies available against, an owner in the event it becomes a record owner of all or any part of the land within the Plat or of any Plat Lot (as defined in the Development Agreement). STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Consent and Subordination was acknowledged before me this day of .19---, by . the and , the of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. STATE OF ) se. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Consent and Subordination was acknowledged before me this day of .19_, by 7 0 T d 81IdP1- Wi3"x1 HA& AzzmcQ* Wa so : fiVo Ze 'LZ 'T 0 CITY OF EDINA By Mayor And Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1991, by a on behalf of the Notary Public 5 9 0a 8'Id1q— .&3H.LEHM &3SmOQ* rota 8 9:EO Z6 'LZ 't0 December 16, 1991 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members of the City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN RE: Preliminary Plat Approval Peter Andrea First Addition Dear Mayor and Council Members: Our firm represents Mr. Daniel J. Spiegel relative to the proposed plat of Peter Andrea First Addition. Mr. Spiegel is a neighbor to this proposed plat and has several concerns regarding the development. As you are aware, the City Council previously approved a plat adjacent to this one named Jyland - Whitney Addition. This plat had a significant impact on the neighborhood because of the loss of trees and dramatic grading changes. My client would like to avoid a similar development which completely changes the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Specifically, as required we are requesting that the City agreement with the developer of the following items be included by Edina City enter into a this plat. Ordinance No. 804, development We are requesting in such an agreement: 1. All retaining walls and driveways will be constructed with specific approval of the Edina City Engineer in order to minimize impact on neighbors. We would request that the width, grading, and location of the driveways all be approved in order to minimize such impact. Sweeney & Borer Professional Association Attorneys at Law Thomas M. Sweeney Suite 1200 Telephone George F. Borer Capital Centre (612) 22 -2541 Paul T. Ostrow Douglas B. Maslow Facsimile 386 North Wabasha Street (612) 223 -5289 Patrick J. Sweeney St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 December 16, 1991 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members of the City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN RE: Preliminary Plat Approval Peter Andrea First Addition Dear Mayor and Council Members: Our firm represents Mr. Daniel J. Spiegel relative to the proposed plat of Peter Andrea First Addition. Mr. Spiegel is a neighbor to this proposed plat and has several concerns regarding the development. As you are aware, the City Council previously approved a plat adjacent to this one named Jyland - Whitney Addition. This plat had a significant impact on the neighborhood because of the loss of trees and dramatic grading changes. My client would like to avoid a similar development which completely changes the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Specifically, as required we are requesting that the City agreement with the developer of the following items be included by Edina City enter into a this plat. Ordinance No. 804, development We are requesting in such an agreement: 1. All retaining walls and driveways will be constructed with specific approval of the Edina City Engineer in order to minimize impact on neighbors. We would request that the width, grading, and location of the driveways all be approved in order to minimize such impact. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members December 16, 1991 Page Two 2. All trees which are shown on developers plan for preservation shall be preserved and shall not be disturbed by the development. If the trees are disturbed, replacement trees of like kind and size and landscaping should be done to replace the disturbed area. 3. No other grading will be done to the property except as shown on the plans. Further, location of building pads will not change from the proposed plan without the prior approval of the City Council. As the City knows, Ordinance 804, Section 12(b)(3) indicates that the location of building pads must be shown in the plans. 4. There will be no further lot splits or subdivisions of the three lots to be created in the proposed plat. We believe that entering into this development agreement will help to minimize impact on the neighborhood and avoid disputes in the future. , It would also appear reasonable to request these restrictions since the plat is going to be utilizing previously undevelopable land. Because of the topography and the general conditions of this neighborhood, specific conditions should be imposed to preserve its integrity. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. very truly yours, & BORER GFB:vlp cc: Daniel J. Spiegel 4 FEB -03 -1992 11:20 FROM SWEENEY 8 BORER TO 9277645 P.02i05 Thomas M. Sweeney George F. Borer Paul T. Ostrow Douglas S. Maslow Patrick J. Sweeney VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Craig Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 55434 AIL , P Sweeney, Borer & Ostrow Pmfissiond Association Attorneys at Law Suite 1200 Telephone Capital Centre (612) M-2641 386 North Wabasha Street (612) 228.5289 St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 February 3, 1992 Re: Peter Andrea First Addition Our File No. 7106 Dear Mr. Larson: Thank you for telefaxing the proposed Development Agreement on Peter Andrea Addition to me last week. I reviewed the Agreement and made some changes in it which I believe were more in the line of Councilmember Kelly's motion for approval. The changes I have made are as follows: 1. I have included an additional "Whereas" paragraph discussing the unique characteristics of the subject property. 2. I have significantly expanded the provisions of Paragraph 1 to include building pad sites and also to include a basis for the City Engineer's approval or alteration of the plans and specifications for the project. Since the building pad sites, tree location, drainage, etc. are all required to be included in the plat approval process by City Ordinance No. 804, I thought all of these things should be reviewed by the City Engineer in conjunction with the construction. 3. 1 have made minor alterations to Paragraphs 2 and 3 to incorporate the approval of the plans and specifications by the City Engineer. 4. Finally, I have altered Paragraph 10 to reflect the continuing obligation of the Plat Lot Owners to maintain driveways and retaining wails. FEB -03 -1992 11:20 FROM SWEENEY & BORER TO 9277645 P.03i05 p Mr. Craig Larson February 3,, 1992 Page Two I again wish to thank you for your continued cooperation in this matter. I look forward to seeing you tonight at the . Council Meeting. Very truly yours, SWEENEY, BORER & OSTROw Geor e� g F. Borer GFB:gc Enclosure cc: Daniel J. Spiegel cc: Jane'Kuhar FEB -03 -1992 11:21 FROM SWEENEY 8 BORER TO PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TERMS TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (PETER ANDREA ADDITION) 9277645 P.04i05 whereas, the Subject Lot is a unique parcel of property which, because of its grade and other special characteristics, requires some special development considerations; and 1. Rai ding Pads. Drivew vs and Ret ining Walls. All building pads, retaining walls and driveways shall be constructed of such materials and pursuant to such plans and specifications as the City Engineer shall approve in writing prior to construction. The plans and specifications shall include the location of building pads and the height, width, location and construction material of the driveways and retaining walls. The plans and specifications shall also include the grading, drainage effect and tree removal to be done in conjunction with the construction. The City Engineer in approving the plans and specifications shall consider the impact of the construction on adjacent land (including other Plat Lots) and shall have the opportunity and the obligation to alter the plans and specifications in order to minimize any adverse effect caused by the proposed construction. In making this determination the City Engineer shall consider aesthetics, drainage effect, preservation of trees, location of improvement to lot lines, and the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Any alterations in the plans and specifications by the City Engineer shall be in his sole discretion, and the Developer and any owner or owners of each Plat Lot (the "Plat Lot Owners ") waive any right to challenge such determination. In approving or altering the plans and specifications the Engineer may consult with owners of adjacent land (including Plat Lot Owners) or other professionals. Once constructed, the Plat Lot Owners shall maintain in good condition and repair such portions of the driveways and retaining walls as are on the Plat Lot of such Plat Lot Owners so that such driveways and retaining, walls are not a hazard or an adverse effect to adjoining land. 2. Tree_ Removal. Developer and all Plat Lot Owners agree to comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 823 of the City relating to the cutting down or removal of trees, in connection with the development of the Plat Lots. Removal of trees in conjunction with the construction of building pads, driveways and retaining walls shall be done in accordance with the plans and specifications referred to in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement and also with the prior written approval of the City Engineer. -1- FEB -03 -1992 11:21 FROM SWEENEY & BORER TO 9277645 P.05i05 3. Erosion nd Sedimentation Control. Developer and all Plat Lot owners agree to comply with the provisions of ordinance No. 817 of the City in connection with the development of the Plat Lots, including, without limitation, the placing or installation and maintenance of erosion control fences and hay bales as required by said ordinance. Grading and erosion control plans shall also be included in the plans and specifications referred to in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement which shall also require the prior written approval of the City Engineer. lo. Release of Agreement. This Agreement shall not be released on any Plat Lot until plans and specifications have been approved by the City Engineer in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 herein, and construction is substantially complete on the building pad, driveway and retaining wall on such Plat Lot. Upon the recording of a specific Release of this Agreement signed by the Mayor and Manager of the City, this Agreement will be deemed terminated, satisfied and released, except for the continuing obligation of the Plat Lot Owners to maintain the driveways and retaining walls as specified in Paragraph 1, herein. -2- o�te iy REPORT /RECOMMENDATION \�bRPGFLP. • lose To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: FRANCIS HOFFMAN CITY ENGINEER' Date: FEBRUARY 3, 1992, Subject: ALLEY VACATION, PARKING /VEHICLES 54th & YORK AVENUE Recommendation: Agenda Item # °- Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA E To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Continue alley vacation on 54th Street and York Avenue indefinitely. Info /Background: The City Council on December 16, 1991, held a hearing on road improvements on York Avenue in the vicinity of West 54th Street. The Council action was to not approve any projects but require the neighbors to remove abandoned vehicles and park operating vehicles on their own property, not in the public right of way. The Police Department has occasionally monitored the situation and the neighbors appear to be in compliance with the parking issues. Second, the neighbors are working on the alley vacation issue but have not completed any documents for private cross -use easements as yet. Craig Larsen and Fran Hoffman have been working with Gary Holman on the issue. The original requestor of the alley vacation has requested that the issue be continued indefinitely pending neighborhood resolution of the alley issue. (over) �a..i, 744 C4 r-1,::P, V C- C- S 15, J`� N S�A-1 g -3 3 ;�- - I (--� �'j one REPORT /RECOMMENDATION �^�vn•rroswt� To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VI.A• From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 30, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 a To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ' ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 142 -A2 to increase amount of bond. Info /Background At its meeting of January 21, 1992 the.Council gave First Reading to Ordinance No. 142 -A2. This item has been placed on the Council Agenda for February 3 for Second Reading and adoption. (over) ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142 TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec: 3. Bonds. Unless exempt by state. law, every applicant for (i) a license registration for the carrying on within the City of the business of plumbing, water softener installing, well drilling or building moving, or (ii) a license pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 429, Part 1 (Oil Burner Installer), 429, Part 2 (Stoker Installer), 429, Part 3 (Steam and Hot Water Heating Installer), 429, Part 4 (Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning Installer), 429, Part 5 (Refrigeration Installer), 431, Part 4 (Gas Fitter) and 1302 (Scavenger) shall file with such application a bond that is valid and in force and effect in the penal sum of at least $5,000.00, with a corporate surety approved by the City Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all material and equipment furnished, and as to all business carried on or all work done, commenced or performed during,the term of the license, license registration or renewal thereof shall:" Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon passage and publication. First Reading: January 21, 1992 Second Reading: ATTEST: City Clerk 22 -2 Mayor ch REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j e t in VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: January 27, 1992 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Fairway Aerator Company 1. Cushman Motor Company, Inc. 2. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Cushman Motor Company, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM VIII-A. Amount of Quote or Bid 1, $17,368.00 2. 3. 4. 5. Only one company submitted a:.bid for this aerator. This is a new piece of equipment for aerating of the fairways. It replaces an old pull type aerator. The Recommended bid is Department x within budget not within Kenneth Rosland City Wallij, Finance Director 913A. Aj ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE � ' rJ.� •a . TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j et in VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: January 27, 1992 AGENDA ITEM VIII-B-- ITEM DESCRIPTION: 16 ft. Tractor Rotary Mower Company 1. MTI Distributing Co. $52,203 with 1971 seven 1. 2, gang mower trade -in Long Lake Ford Tractor Inc. 2• 3. North Star Turf, Inc. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MTI Distributing Co. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $48,203.00 No Bid No Bid Two other companies submitted paperwork but did not bid. A new 16 foot rotary mower replacing a 1971 seven gang reel mower. This is a change, a new technology in mowing whereas a higher grass can be mowed with the same quality as a reel mower which has difficulty mowing a higher grass during the late spring and early summer. Has a big advantage in cheaper maintenance in sharpening of the blades instead of the old reel mowers that took mj�.qy hours to sharpen. ure Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within budoei Kenneth Wallin, FinVice Director City Mana .1. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 1/30/92 AGENDA ITEM VIII.0 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sandpro rake to rake sand traps at Golf Course. Company Amount of Quote or &d cost trade -in 1.. MTI Distributing Company $8,469 $2,000 1. $6,469 2. Wayzata Lawn Mower. $8,503 $1,000 2. $7,503 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MTI Distributing Company $6,469 GENERAL INFORMATION: Trade in of the 1984 Sand Pro (Serial Number 08880 - 40537). Purchase of a new 14 HP Sand Pro Rake. 0 The Recommended bid is within budget no Kenneth Rosland City k 9%. . .0p ° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM; Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works - -y /j VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE February 3, 1992 AGENDA ITEM VIII . D . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company 1. Midwest Machinery 2. Ziegler Inc. 3. Midwest Machinery 4. 5. One Used Grader 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Amount of Quote or &d $69,900.00 $74,500.00 $76,400.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: Midwest Machinery $76,400 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a motor grader purchase replacing unit #25.403, 1966 model. This purchase was a bid for a good quality, low use, used motor grader. We received three bids from two firms for used equipment. We evaluated the machines in terms of hours used to date, mechanical condition, test driving, and warranty of machines. After full review, the lowest true bid is the second Midwest Machinery bid, a 1989 model 672B John Deere Grader. See attached memorandum. This purchase is funded by the equipment replacement fund. ' natured' The Recommended bid is within budget Public Works - Streets Dep n not wit ' bu ii Kohn Wallin, Finance Director i /7 Kenneth Rosland City Manager CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 1991 TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer & Director of Public Works FROM: Steve Johnson, Purchasing SUBJECT: AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ONE USED MOTOR GRADER On December 26, 1991, bids were opened for one used motor grader, 1986 or newer. Three .bids were received'for.used machines: Ziegler Inc. $79,000 - $4,500 trade = $74,500 Midwest Machinery $71,900 - $2,000 trade = $69,900 Midwest Machinery $78,400 - $2,000 trade = $76,400 A comparison of machines is as follows: The reason we are bidding a used machine is because of the price of new equipment. The three machines bid as new equipment would range in price from $98,000 to $130,000. We feel there is a substantial savings to the City by securing a good solid used machine. For comparison purposes, to determine the best value for the City of Edina, we would use 'a $16 per hour owning and.operating cost which is an industry wide documented figure. From this $16 cost we would take out the cost for fuel, tires, grease and oil, and repair costs. These costs are about one half of the $16 cost, leaving us $8 per hour as a "to own" cost. Applying this $8 figure to our three bids works out as follows according to hours and condition of machine. The bid from Ziegler for a 1986 machine with 2832 hours for $74,500 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 2832 hours = $22,656 of additional cost. This owning cost plus bid equals $97,156 and eliminates this bid as the low responsive bid. Year Mdl Hours Warranty Tires Ziegler Inc. 1986 120G 2832 6 mos fair Midwest Machinery 1990 670B 1700 6 mos fair Midwest Machinery 1989 672B 875 18 mos new The reason we are bidding a used machine is because of the price of new equipment. The three machines bid as new equipment would range in price from $98,000 to $130,000. We feel there is a substantial savings to the City by securing a good solid used machine. For comparison purposes, to determine the best value for the City of Edina, we would use 'a $16 per hour owning and.operating cost which is an industry wide documented figure. From this $16 cost we would take out the cost for fuel, tires, grease and oil, and repair costs. These costs are about one half of the $16 cost, leaving us $8 per hour as a "to own" cost. Applying this $8 figure to our three bids works out as follows according to hours and condition of machine. The bid from Ziegler for a 1986 machine with 2832 hours for $74,500 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 2832 hours = $22,656 of additional cost. This owning cost plus bid equals $97,156 and eliminates this bid as the low responsive bid. 1�. Midwest Machinery bid two machines, one a 1990 machine with 1700 hours for $639,900 plus owning costs of $8 per hour x 1700 hours = $13,600 of additional.cost. This owning cost plus bid equals $83,500. Midwest Machinery's second bid was for a 1989 hours for $76,400 plus owning costs of $8 per $7,000 of additional cost. Thi's owning cost $83,400. This machine has the remainder of a months vs 63,months). A one year warranty, if other machines is $1950 plus option. machine with 875 hour x 875 hours plus b i d equals 2 year warranty (18 purchased, on the If we add the extended one year warranty of $1950 to the 1990 machine our total would be $85,450. Therefore, we are recommending, as the best value for the City of Edina, the bid from Midwest Machinery for the 1989 machine with 875 hours and the automatic one year extended warranty. 1;Sa. At ° N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE- 3 February, 1992 AGENDA ITEM VIII . E . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Paint: 220 Gal. White, 770 Gal. Yellow Company Amount of Quote or Ed 1. Linear Dynamics, Inc. 1. $ 6,332.70 2. Sherwin Williams 2. $ 6,781.50 3. Diamond Vogel Paints 3. $ 7,527.30 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Linear Dynamics, Inc. $ 6,332.70 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an annual purchase for traffic paint for our City streets and crosswalks. This purchase is thru the general operating budget at Public Works. Public Works Streets Signature Dep nt The Recommended bid is within budget not within mdge %ohn YV01in, Finance Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager 1 - -A of 'J +a REFORTIREC OMMENDAT10N To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Agenda Item — IX. A. Consent Information Only Date: February 3, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ! i To HRA Subject: Tax Forfeit Land �i x! To Council on Vernon Court Action 771 Motion i X Resolution ' ! Ordinance �! Discussion Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve sale of land at public auction. BACKGROUND /INFO Following the July 21, 1992, Council meeting staff sent the attached letter to 93 homeowners in the Viking Hills neighborhood and on Gleason Court. The letter asks whether the neighbors have an interest in acquiring the land by paying off the special assessments levied against the property. Twenty -three (23) or 25 percent returned the survey. None of the property owners who returned the survey had an interest in acquiring the property. over January 24, 1992 Dear Viking Hills or Gleason Court Resident: Re: Vernon Court Property (See Reverse). This does not include the 1 acre lot at the east end of Vernon Court. The subject property is in the process of being forfeited to the State for unpaid taxes. If the property is indeed forfeited it would be resold at a public auction. Prior to tax forfeiture sale the City is given the opportunity to acquire the land for public purposes. Public purposes include parks, open space, streets, roads, etc. The purpose of this letter is to see if you and your neighbors are interested in acquiring the subject property to add to the open space provided by Krahl Hill. If the City were to acquire the property, the cost would be approximately $157,000 to cover special assessments currently levied against this property. The City would look to your neighborhood to cover this cost. You may recall that the Viking Hills neighborhood helped purchase Krahl Hill for open space. This notice is being sent to 93 property owners in Viking Hills and on Gleason Court. If all property owners shared equally in the cost, each share would be about $1,700.00. The City Council would like to know if you would be interested in acquiring the property and if you would be willing to pay the estimated cost. This would be a voluntary purchase by the neighborhood, it would not be an assessment against your property. You can express your views by attending the City Council meeting on February 3,. 1992 or by returning the bottom portion of this letter in the enclosed post paid envelope prior to the meeting. Si erely, L&W, (JA,J raig Larsen City Planner CLljh Please fill out below, sign, and return in enclosed postpaid envelope --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- YES I would be willing to contribute towards the acquisition of this property. NO, I am not interested in contributing towards acquisition of this property . Name: Address. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM IX.B M E M O R A N D U M TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRED RICHARDS, MAYOR SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992 I am recommending appointment of the following individuals whose terms expire on February 1: Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1/95) Arthur Dickey, Susan Kelm, DeLores Paul Board of Appeals and Adjustments (3 year term to 2/1/95) Donald Patton Building Construction Appeals Board (3 year term to 2/1/95) Quentin Collins, Eugene Palmer Community Development and Planning Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95) David Byron, Robert Hale, Gordon Johnson One appointment pending. Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/94) David Rosenblatt, Sally Tang Two more appointments needed - current members cannot continue to serve. (consumers or one consumer /one provider) Edina Park Board (3 year term to 2/1/95) James Fee, Andrew Herring, William Lord Edina Recycling Commission (2 year term to 2/1/94) William Brauer, Jr., Ardythe Buerosse, Robert Reid Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/94) Marilyn Curtis, Garold Nyberg One more appointment needed - current member cannot continue to serve. Human Relations Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95) Nancy Atchison (S), John Crist (C), Phyllis Kohler (S) (School Board approved reappointment of both Atchison and Kohler.) One appointment pending (Council). One vacancy (Rifley unexpired term to 2/1/94). 13A. qLe A REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards Agenda item # From: an d Council Members Consent ❑ Bob Kojetin, Director Information Only ❑ Date: Park and Recreation Dept. Mgr . Recommends El To HRA Subject: January 31, 1992 0 To Council Action [2 Motion Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend Lowell McCarthy as the Assistant Weed Inspector, 1992. Info/Background- Lowell McCarthy has worked with the Edina Park and Recreation Department for the past 25 years. Last year Mr. McCarthy, worked as an assistant to the Assistant Weed Inspector, Eugene Davis. During that time he became familiar with the rules and. regulations regarding weed ordinances. He also attended clinics on nuisance and weed ordinances. U .. R REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND , MANAGER Agenda Item # From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 30, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: CHANGE OF POLLING PLACE Y To Council PRECINCT NO. 16 & 13 Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption by the Council of the following resolution: RRQl1T UTTOM BE IT RESOLVED by'the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that the polling place for Precinct No. 16 be changed to Cornelia School, 7000 Cornelia Drive; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the polling place for Precinct No. 13 be changed to Centennial Lakes Park Centrum, 7499 France Avenue South. Info /Background Precinct No. 16 has been voting at the Southdale Hennepin Area Library. I have been notified by the Hennepin County Library Administrative Offices that the Southdale Library meeting room will close on February 1, 1992 because of the building renovation project and will not be available for voting in 1992, 1993 and part of 1994. I am proposing to move Precinct No. 16 to Cornelia School and to move Precinct No. 13, which now votes at Cornelia School, to Centennial Lakes Park Centrum. Both these locations would comply with election law which permits polling locations to be located up to 3000 feet outside of the precinct boundary if no suitable location is available within the precinct. (The attached map reflects the proposed changes.) e. I - ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 8 1992 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4204 - 420 -42 CHECK REGISTER 10- 4504 - 420 -42 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034701 01/22/92 43.75 HENN CTY SHERIFF EQUIP MAINT 27- 2010 - 000 -00 43.75 * 27- 2010 - 000 -00 034702 01/22/92 1,812.50 HENN CTY TREAS PRINTING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 1,812.50 * 50- 2010 - 000 -00 034703 01/22/92 147.50 CRIME CONTROL DIGEST DUES 401624 8051 10- 4620- 560 -56 147.50 * 10- 4266- 420 -42 034704 01/22/92 31.95 MIKE SIITARI GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.95 * 034705 01/22/92 10.00 MN DEPT OF LICENSE 10.00 * 034706 01/22/92 151.94 BOB BRAMWELL MILEAGE 151.94 * 034707 01/22/92 68,618.00 MIRCLE REC EQUIP WATER SLIDE 68,618.00 * 034708 01/22/92 11.00 RICHARD B MYRE LICENSE 11.00 * 034709 01/22/92 80.00 MN URBAN TRAFFIC REGISTRATION 80.00 * 034710 01/28/92 2,656.00 LUIS HERNANDEZ SERVICES 034710 01/22/92 2,608.00 LUIS HERNANDEZ SERVICES 034710 01/22/92 2,608.00- LUIS HERNANDEZ SERVICES 034710 01/22/92 2,608.00 LUIS HERNANDEZ SERVICES 034710 01/28/92 2,608.00- LUIS HERNANDEZ REFEREE 2,656.00 * 034711 01/22/92 152.00 FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME MIX 034711 01/27/92 192.00 FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME MIX 034711 01/22/92 84.00 FLAHERTY HAPPY TYME MIX 428.00 * 034712 01/24/92 225.00 SCOTT THOMPSON REIMBURSEMENT 225.00 * 034713 01/22/92 1,426.40 HANCO CORP PARTS 034713 01/22/92 379.45 HANCO CORP PARTS 1,805.85 * 034714 01/24/92 48.60 S A SCHWARTZ JR REIMBURSEMENT 48.60 * 034715 01/22/92 932.04 JAY JAFFEE PRO SERVICES 932.04 * 034716 01/22/92 221.05 MICHAEL NIBBE CONT ED 221.05 * 034717 01/22/92 40.00 IACCI DUES 1 02 -03 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4600 - 420 -42 2016 10- 4204 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 30- 4204 - 781 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 26- 1300 - 000 -00 332185 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 280 -28 27- 2010 - 000 -00 27- 2010 - 000 -00 27- 4201 - 667 -66 27- 4201 - 667 -66 27- 4201 - 667 -66 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 2010 - 000 -00 401624 8051 10- 4620- 560 -56 403395 8051 10- 4266- 420 -42 12- 4201 - 434 -43 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4204 - 420 -42 1 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 034718 034718 034718 034719 034719 034720 034720 034720 034721 034722 034723 034724 034725 034726 034726 034727 034728 034729 034730 034731 034732 034733 S 01/27/92 01/22/92 01/27/92 01/22/92 01/27/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/22/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 01/24/92 AMOUNT 40.00 * 90.00- 90.00 45.00 45.00 * 85.00 176.00 261.00 * 4,284.00 4,284.00- 4,284.00 4,284.00 * 43.75 43.75 * 355.00 355.00 * 195.67 195.67 * 255.57 255.57 * 2,925.00 2,925.00 * 15.00 20.00 35.00 * 999.36 999.36 * 85.00 85.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 75.00 75.00 * 150.00 150.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 25.00 25.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION THE POLICE INSTITUTE THE POLICE INSTITUTE THE POLICE INSTITUTE COSINES INC COSINES INC MAMA -LMC MAMA -LMC MAMA -LMC PETERSON PORTRAITS ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS RINGS & THINGS MN CERAMICS SUPPLY BUCKHORN BOB CONNOLLY BOB CONNOLLY MN UC FUND JIM SCHATTAUER CHRIS MEYER JACKI BETSWORTH BACHMANS MARIAN ALSTAD PATTI JEUB CONT ED CONT ED CONT ED GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES DUSE DUSE PORTRAIT REPAIR PARTS COST /GOODS SOLD COST /GOODS SOLD RECYCLING CONTAINERS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES UNEMPLOYMENT CHG 2/27/92 2/9/92 2/6/92 4/30/92 4/28/92 4/23/92 02 -03 -92 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8527 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8527 10- 4202 - 420 -42 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 784 -78 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 100 -10 8872 10- 4540- 646 -64 38671 8833 23- 4624 - 613 -61 91005 8544 23- 4624 - 613 -61 123661 8734 10- 2010 - 000 -00 116348 8519 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 10- 4160 - 510 -51 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 l 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034734 01/24/92 25.00 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD 4/9/92 25.00 * 034735 01/24/92 25.00 BARB MAKELA 4/7/92 25.00 * 034736 01/24/92 25.00 SUSAN FRAME 3/28/92 25.00 * 034737 01/24/92 25.00 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD 3/19/92 25.00 * 034738 01/24/92 30.00 BOB CONNOLLY 3/15/92 30.00 * 034739 01/24/92 25.00 BILL DIETRICHSON 3/8/92 25.00 * 034740 01/24/92 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD 3/5892 25.00 * 034741 01/24/92 174.40 SGD CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 034741 01/24/92 320.07 SGD CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 494.47 * 034742 01/24/92 469.89 JAMES & CO INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 469.89 * 034743 01/24/92 121.95 BRUEGGARS BAGELS REFUND 121.95 * 034744 01/24/92 62.48 SCHUSTER EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 62.48 * 034745 01/24/92 56.00 CENTRAL LOCK /SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.00 * 034746 01/24/92 215.00 BEAR COMM INC CABLE 215.00 * 034747 01/24/92 2,400.00 VEAP HUMAN SERVICES 2,400.00 * 034748 01/24/92 50.00 MARIA BROWN 3/12/92 50.00 * 034749 01/24/92 50.00 DIANE RAINS 4/13/92 50.00 * 034750 01/24/92 50.00 MARILYN BOE 4/30/92 50.00 * 034751 01/27/92 57.00 MONDALE POLICY FORUM CONT ED 57.00 * 02 -03 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 27- 4504 - 666 -66 40478 7531 27- 4504 - 667 -66 40478 7531 27- 2010 - 000 -00 326909 8718 40- 1130 - 000 -00 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7208 8417 25- 4504 - 385 -30 8500 25- 4504 - 385 -30 10507 8363 10- 4201 - 504 -50 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 12- 4202 - 434 -43 3 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE RRRkRk *R * -CKS 034753 01/27/92 540.00 STEVE SEGNER SERVICE 50- 4233 - 820 -82 15333 034753 01/27/92 810.00 STEVE SEGNER SERVICE 50- 4233 - 840 -84 15333 034753 01/27/92 810.00 STEVE SEGNER SERVICE 50- 4233 - 860 -86 15333 2,160.00 * 034754 01/27/92 10.50 LOWELL MCCARTHY SERVICES 10- 4201 - 600 -60 10.50 * 034755 01/27/92 948.00 LARSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 8494 948.00 * 034756 01/27/92 72.50 MAHA DIST 6 ADVERTISING 27- 2010 - 000 -00 8995 72.50 * 034757 01/27/92 85.00 BLMGTN HTG /AIR COND REPAIRS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 2174 8993 85.00 * 034758 01/27/92 108.00 KRATECH INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 667 -66 019887 8990 108.00 * 034759 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTER EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034760 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034761 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034762 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034763 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034764 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034765 01/27/92 15.00 NATL REGISTRY EMTS REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 440 -44 15.00 * 034766 01/27/92 42.95 EMERGENCY SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 440 -44 42.95 * 034767 01/27/92 11.00 THOMAS JENSON LICENSE 10- 4310 - 440 -44 11.00 * 034768 01/27/92 45.90 NIGHTINGALE CONANT BOOKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7183 45.90 * 034769 01/27/92 180.00 UNIQUE INSTALLATION REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 1126 7668 034769 01/27/92 261.00 UNIQUE INSTALLATION BED REPAIRS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 1126 7668 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 441.00 * 034770 01/27/92 378.00 MAB ENTER INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5507 8312 378.00 * 034771 01/27/92 499.66 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8308 499.66 * 034772 01/27/92 488.25 NEW PIG CORP SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 799385 8309 488.25 * 034773 01/27/92 1,088.00 AM TEST CENTER TEST LADDERS 10- 2010- 000 -00 8901 034773 01/27/92 1,088.00 AM TEST CENTER TEST LADDERS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 8901 034773 01/27/92 1,088.00- AM TEST CENTER TEST LADDERS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 8901 1,088.00 * 034774 ,01/27/92 252.44 DAN G JOHNSON REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7186 034774 01/27/92 287.70 DAN G JOHNSON REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 8567 540.14 * 034775 01/27/92 60.00 ISFSI DUES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 65873 034775 01/27/92 60.00- ISFSI DUES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 65873 034775 01/27/92 60.00 ISFSI DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 65873 034775 01/27/92 93.31 ISFSI HAZMAT INFO 10- 4570 - 440 -44 69829 8900 153.31 * 034776 01/27/92 69.00 IFSTA BOOKS 10- 4502 - 440 -44 535324 8294 69.00 * 034777 01/27/92 24.50 CAROL BRIGHT ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 24.50 * 034778 01/27/92 28.00 CATY CRABB ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 28.00 * 034779 01/27/92 22.40 JULIE GREENWOOD ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 22.40 * 034780 01/27/92 87.43 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 87.43 * 034781 01/27/92 37.45 BETTY THOMPSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 37.45 * 034782 01/27/92 85.40 CY TURNBLADH ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 85.40 * 034783 01/27/92 31.85 SHIRLEY WECHSLER ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 31.85 * 034784 01/27/92 31.50 HELEN VANWINKLE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 31.50 * 034785 01/27/92 30.73 ANN WIDERSTROM ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 30.73 * 1992 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4502 - 440 -44 CHECK REGISTER 10- 4204 - 440 -44 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034786 01/27/92 1,375.00 ROSE EDIN AC INSTRUCTOR 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1,375.00 * 30- 4504- 784 -78 10232 8814 034787 01/27/92 70.00 FLORENCE WRIGHT REFUND 70.00 * 034788 01/27/92 210.00 PATTI JEUB AC INSTRUCTOR 210.00 * 034789 01/27/92 85.40 NORMA HANLON ART WORK SOLD 034789 01/27/92 80.00 NORMA HANLON AC INSTRUCTOR 034789 01/27/92 24.00 NORMA HANLON CRAFT SUPPLIES 189.40 * 034790 01/27/92 30.00 BOB CONNOLLY AC INSTRUCTOR 30.00 * 034791 01/27/92 168.00 LOUISE GILLIS AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 034792 01/27/92 180.00 DANNY MACKERMAN AC INSTRUCTOR 180.00 * 034793 01/27/92 140.00 MN STATE FIRE DUES 140.00 * 034794 01/27/92 107.80 PDR PUBLICATIONS 107.80 * 034795 01/27/92 21.45 LABOR RELATIONS BOOK 21.45 * 034796 01/27/92 20.90 ECONOMIC PRESS SUBSCRIPTION 20.90 * 034797 01/27/92 80.00 CELLULAR 1 SALES /SVC REPAIRS 80.00 * 034798 01/27/92 35.00 U OF M CONT ED 35.00 * 034799 01/27/92 22.50 MSHS MEMBERSHIP 22.50 * 034800 01/27/92 25.00 RICHARD CASEY REFUND 25.00 * 034801 01/27/92 25.00 THERESA LAU REFUND 25.00 * 034802 01/27/92 427.50 LIZ SUNNE SERVICES 427.50 * 034803 01/27/92 312.00 OSWALD HOSE /ADAPR GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -03 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4588- 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10- 4502 - 440 -44 7669 10- 4502 - 440 -44 002253 8295 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10- 4248 - 440 -44 22631 8572 10- 4202 - 640 -64 10- 4202 - 640 -64 30- 3505 - 000 -00 30- 3505 - 000 -00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4504- 784 -78 10232 8814 6 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE 312.00 * 034804 01/28/92 189.96 POOLPAK GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 0780 883 034804 01/27/92 4,850.00 POOLPAK GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 783 -78 0775 8722 5,039.96 * 034805 01/28/92 99.20 MPLS HEALTH DEPT PRO SERVICE 10- 4201 - 420 -42 6541 99.20 * 034806 01/28/92 4,000.00 CORNERSTONE HUMAN SERVICE 10- 4201 - 504 -50 4,000.00 * 034807 01/28/92 531.00 METRO ELECTRO PAINT EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 8282 531.00 * 034808 01/28/92 30.00 ROBERT GRUNSTROM CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 30.00 * 034809 01/28/92 29.27 RON MUNDALE CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 29.27 * 034810 01/28/92 29.80 MICHAEL SIITARI CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 29.80 * 034811 01/28/92 25.32 RON RIEGERT CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 25.32 * 034812 01/28/92 120.00 ASIAN TRANSLTN SVC PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 420 -42 120.00 * 034813 01/28/92 251.57 ROGER OLWIN TRAINING 10- 4901 - 420 -42 251.57 * 034814 01/28/92 39.00 MOBILE CELLULAR LTD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 86895 39.00 * 034815 01/28/92 146.05 HUDSON MAP CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 4947 8892 146.05 * 034816 01/28/92 24.79 VIKTORS KONTERS CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 24.79 * 034817 01/28/92 284.32 MILTONA TURF PROD TURF STAKES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 4150 8882 284.32 * 034818 01/28/92 20.00 DAVID RINE CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 20.00 * 034819 01/28/92 54,150.00 ASSOC POOL BLDERS CONSTRUCTION 26- 2010 - 000 -00 54,150.00 * 034820 01/28/92 62.00 LEONARD OR MARY AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 62.00 * 034821 01/28/92 50,000.00 LESTER BLDG SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 006 -00 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50,000.00 * 034822 01/28/92 120.00 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 120.00 * 034823 01/28/92 1,608.68 SERV MASTER / EDINA REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 917307 8816 1,608.68 * 034824 01/28/92 47.90 HCMC BOOKS 10- 4502- 440 -44 8905 47.90 * 034825 01/28/92 6,795.00 METRO BLDG SYST INC CONSTRUCTION 26- 1300 - 000 -00 108701 6,795.00 * 034826 01/28/92 350.00 ALLIANCE CONTRACT 10- 4201 - 260 -26 350.00 * 034827 01/28/92 948.28 CONPUTER CITY GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504- 434 -43 24024 8921 948.28 * 034828 01/28/92 199.00 LASER QUIPT GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 63022 9069 199.00 * 034829 01/28/92 9.24 VIKING LAB GENERAK SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 57383 8399 034829 01/28/92 258.95 VIKING LAB WATER TREATMENT 30- 4564- 782-78 57330 9066 268.19 * 034830 01/28/92 687.00 VIKING IMPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 814 8721 687.00 * 034831 01/28/92 147.00 MICHAEL STEDDUM ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 147.00 * 034832 01/28/92 70.00 ELIZABETH SELDEN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 70.00 * 034833 01/28/92 56.15 CHASELLE INC CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 230611 8543 56.15 * 034834 01/28/92 5.00 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 5.00 * 034835 01/28/92 63.09 TOM SHIRLEY MILEAGE 30- 2010 - 000 -00 63.09 * 034836 01/28/92 43.95 CINDY WAKNITZ MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 43.95 * 034837 01/28/92 50.00 SIREK HYD SVC SERVICES 30- 4288 - 784 -78 014225 50.00 * 034838 01/28/92 270.00 ABBRA EMPLYMT SVC SERVICES 27- 2010 - 000 -00 3638 9021 270.00 * 034839 01/28/92 304.35 TOM HOUGNON REIMBURSEMENT 27- 4202 - 661 -66 1992 CITY OF EDINA GENERAL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 8504 ALTERNATOR 304.35 * 034840 01/28/92 144.00 7237 8483 144.00 * 034841 01/28/92 559.80 10- 4504- 560 -56 7239 559.80 * * * * * ** REBUILD REPAIR 034A10 01/24/92 50.60 8682 ALTERNATOR 50.60 * * * * * ** PSRTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 034A21 01/28/92 195.71 034A21 01/28/92 38.33 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16544 234.04 * ALTERNATOR REBUILD RESPIRATOR *;:A 29 01/22/92 11.40 034A29 01/22/92 620.27 631.67 * * * * * ** 034A34 01/24/92 94.00 94.00 * * * * ** 034A39 01/24/92 111.38 034A39 01/24/92 159.84 034A39 01/24/92 21.96 034A39 01/24/92 71.50 034A39 01/24/92 71.50 034A39 01/24/92 109.00 034A39 01/24/92 265.44 810.62 * * * * * ** 034A46 01/27/92 9.65 9.65 * * * * * ** 034A53 01/24/92 108.78 - 034A53 01/24/92 108.78 034A53 01/24/92 108.78 108.78 * * * * ** 034A64 01/27/92 1,062.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SANDY SCHWARTZ REIMBURSEMENT PRAIRIE ELECT CO REPAIRS ABP MIDWEST ADT SECURITY SYS ADT SECURITY SYS ALBINSON ALBINSON MEETING EXP ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERVICES SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -03 -92 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4202 - 661 -66 27- 2010 - 000 -00 2268 8526 * ** -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 535037 8891 * ** -CKS 30- 4304 - 782 -78 30- 4304 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 079458 8395 40- 2010 - 000 -00 76167 8637 * ** -CKS ALLIED PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 25148 8430 * ** -CKS ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 7238 8504 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 343 -30 7237 8483 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504- 560 -56 7239 8506 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16018 8682 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PSRTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16294 8598 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16544 8681 ALTERNATOR REBUILD RESPIRATOR /CARTRIDGE 10- 4642 - 301 -30 7260 8632 ACTION MESSENGER AMERICAN SHARECOM AMERICAN SHARECOM AMERICAN SHARECOM MARIAN ALSTAD SERVICE CONTRACT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE AC INSTRUCTOR 30- 4288 - 781 -78 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4256 - 510 -51 10- 4256 - 510 -51 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 12812 8622 1,062.00 * * ** -CKS xxxxxx 10- 2010 - 000 -00 674464 7650 034A95 01/27/92 105.00 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD AC INSTRUCTOR 105.00 * * ** -CKS 034A96 01/24/92 174.66 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR REPAIRS 174.66 * 50- 4248 - 821 -82 RRRRRR 50- 4516 - 840 -84 8759 034A99 01/28/92 21.94 AXT -LYLE CONCESSIONS 21.94 * 50- 4626 - 822 -82 xxxxxx 50- 4626- 842 -84 034B01 01/24/92 34.50 B & B SEAT COVERS REPAIR PARTS 34.50 * xxRxxx 034803 01/22/92 54.00 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 034803 01/27/92 44.85 BENSON OPTICAL GLASSES 98.85 * R R R R R R 034807 01/27/92 32.20 MAUREEN BROCKWAY ART WORK SOLD 32.20 * RRxRRx 034813 01/24/92 117.00 BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERV 117.00 * 034B14 01/24/92 325.98 BOYER TRUCKS PARTS 325.98 * xxRxxR 034B21 01/22/92 24.88 BANKSYSTEMS REPAIRS 034B21 01/27/92 100.88 BANKSYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 125.76 * 034B22 01/27/92 1,310.70 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 034822 01/27/92 64.00 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 1,374.70 * RRRxRR 034B27 01/27/92 187.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 034B27 01/27/92 338.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 034B27 01/27/92 265.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 791.00 02 -03 -92 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4201- 611 -61 10- 4248 - 560 -56 10694 8705 * ** -CKS 29- 4624 - 722 -72 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 12812 8622 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 674464 7650 * ** -CKS 23- 3625 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 260 -26 10- 4620 - 560 -56 102707 8690 * ** -CKS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 5629 50- 4516 - 840 -84 8759 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034B30 01/22/92 17.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 743646 034B30 01/22/92 93.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 743613 034830 01/22/92 4.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 743613 034B30 01/24/92 80.64 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 745189 034630 01/24/92 14.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 745215 034B30 01/22/92 118.51 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 743607 034B30 01/24/92 68.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 510 -51 746114 034B30 01/28/92 118.07 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 746675 8568 515.72 * 034831 01/27/92 42.00 BETSY BRYANT PT A MAINT 23- 4120 - 612 -61 034831 01/27/92 360.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 402.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034635 01/22/92 498.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT REPAIRS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 12906 6047 034B35 01/28/92 380.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 013439 8531 878.00 * ** * * ** * ** -CKS 034637 01/28/92 377.00 BISHOP TRAVEL CENTER AIRFARE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 010948 377.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034846 01/24/92 236.17 BLMGT LINO /CARPET REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 11041 8427 236.17 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034870 01/24/92 744.00 BARRETT MOV /STORE MOVE VOTING MACHINE 10- 4201 - 180 -18 C30681 744.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034B74 01/27/92 215.00 BRADLEY BENN REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 034874 01/27/92 220.00 BRADLEY BENN AC OFFICE ADM 23- 4120 - 611 -61 034674 01/27/92 202.00 BRADLEY BENN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 637.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034C01 01/27/92 186.92- C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMM 23- 4624 - 611 -61 133206 8737 034C01 01/27/92 186.92 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMM 23- 4624 - 611 -61 133206 8737 034C01 01/22/92 153.31 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 132845 8733 034C01 01/22/92 425.06 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613-61 132668 8537 034C01 01/22/92 323.36 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 132671 8539 034C01 01/27/92 186.92 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMM 23- 4624 - 613 -61 133206 8737 1,088.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 034C07 01/22/92 1,361.77 034C07 01/22/92 1,602.06 034C07 01/27/92 1,588.21 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 4,552.04 * 034C08 01/24/92 66.00 BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 66.00 * * * * * ** OF BLOOMINGTON HEALTH SERVICES 034C17 01/24/92 92.00 OF EDINA WATER 92.00 * * * * * ** CITY OF EDINA 034C22 01/24/92 220.89 034C22 01/24/92 71.22 10- 2010 - 000 -00 292.11 * * * * * ** WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034025 01/24/92 207.76 WATER 10- 4258- 520 -52 207.76 * * * * * ** OF EDINA WATER 034C30 01/22/92 143.80 OF EDINA WATER 143.80 * 034C31 01/27/92 31,349.25 WATER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 31,349.25 * * * * * ** OF RICHFIELD SERVICES 034C33 01/27/92 28.64 034C33 01/27/92 28.64 034C33 01/27/92 196.90 034C33 01/27/92 245.23 034C33 01/27/92 196.90 034C33 01/27/92 196.90 - 034C33 01/27/92 96.66 034C33 01/27/92 28.64 624.71 * 034C34 01/22/92 1,007.25 1,007.25 * 034C35 01/27/92 214.00 214.00 * * * * * ** 034C44 01/22/92 677.98 677.98 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT CSI GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -03 -92 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4538- 318 -30 745573 6180 10- 4538- 318 -30 746530 6180 10- 4538 - 318 -30 746999 6180 25- 4504 - 385 -30 15502 8704 CDP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 85994 8706 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 104297 8522 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 CITY BEER BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON HEALTH SERVICES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 14341 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258- 520 -52 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 520 -52 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 CITY OF RICHFIELD SERVICES 10- 4201 - 600 -60 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 1046 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 2010- 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RRRRRR 034C51 01/24/92 2,443.80 MN DEPT OF FUEL TAX 2,443.80 * RRRRRR 034C54 01/24/92 132.51 CONVEYORS REPAIR PARTS 132.51 * RRRRRR 034C87 01/27/92 81.63 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 81.63 * RRRRRR 034C89 01/28/92 31.50 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.50 * RRRRRR 034C92 01/27/92 195.97 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIRS 195.97 * RRRRRR 034D07 01/28/92 129.92 D.C. HEY CO. REPAIRS 034D07 01/28/92 30.00 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 159.92 * R R R k k k 034D24 01/27/92 46.50 DIANE SANKEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 034D24 01/27/92 6.26 DIANE SANKEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 03024 01/27/92 23.35 DIANE SANKEY CONT ED 76.11 * RRRRRR 03026 01/27/92 228.00 TOBIE DICKER PT AC MAINT 034D26 01/27/92 920.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 1,148.00 * RRRRRR 03031 01/24/92 217.75 DAVIES WATER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 034D31 01/24/92 401.02 DAVIES WATER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 618.77 * R *RRkR 03036 01/27/92 431.00 BILL DIETRICHSON AC INSTRUCTOR 431.00 * 02 -03 -92 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010- 000 -00 002068 * ** -CKS 50- 4540 - 821 -82 11431 8169 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 8775 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 784 -78 52091 8810 **A-CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 003745 8902 * ** -CKS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 260047 9049 30- 4288 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 643 -64 10- 4802 - 280 -28 *** -CKS 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4201- 611 -61 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 21453 8239 40- 4540 - 803 -80 21552 8765 *** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1992 CITY OF EDINA 131.66 EAGLE CHECK REGISTER WINE 034E11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RRRRRR 01/22/92 153.33 EAGLE WINE MIX 034E11 034D52 01/24/92 73.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 034D52 01/24/92 31.50 DISPATCH COMM /MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 034D52 01/24/92 15.80 DISPATCH COMM /MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 034D52 01/28/92 76.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN SERVICE CONTRACT 17.78 EMER MED. PRODUCTS 196.30 17.78 R R R R R R 034E11 01/22/92 131.66 EAGLE WINE WINE 034E11 01/22/92 163.20 EAGLE WINE BEER 034E11 01/22/92 153.33 EAGLE WINE MIX 034E11 01/22/92 67.20 EAGLE WINE MIX 034E11 01/27/92 209.37 EAGLE WINE MIX 034E71 50- 4632 - 862 -86 724.76 ELVIN SAFETY 50- 4632- 862 -86 529323 RRRRRR 034E17 01/27/92 314.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 034E17 01/27/92 9,790.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 10,104.60 R R R R R R 034E26 02 -03 -92 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE BEER 034E26 **A-CKS 27- 4504 - 661 -66 93908 BEER 27- 4504 - 661 -66 93909 19.20- 27- 4504- 661 -66 93909 034E26 30- 4288 - 782 -78 17420 ED PHILLIPS & SONS MIX * ** -CKS 50- 4628- 862 -86 528251 10- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 4630 - 842 -84 527828 59.00 * 50- 4632- 822 -82 527779 034E71 50- 4632 - 862 -86 527819 ELVIN SAFETY 50- 4632- 862 -86 529323 10- 4540 - 520 -52 180.20 * ** -CKS 50- 2010 - 000 -00 �. 50- 2010 - 000 -00 034E73 034E26 01/22/92 19.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 034E26 01/22/92 190.20- ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 034E26 01/22/92 19.20- ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 034E26 01/27/92 19.05• ED PHILLIPS & SONS MIX 209.25* * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034E29 1/23/92 59.00 * Edina Art Center Supplies 034E71 01/22/92 180.20 ELVIN SAFETY GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 180.20 RRRRRR 034E73 01/27/92 17.78 EMER MED. PRODUCTS AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 17.78 RRRRRR 034E75 01/22/92 300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 300.00 * RRRRRR 034F37 01/24/92 245.00 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO REPAIR PARTS 245.00 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS lU- M7V4- OL / -OG *sell e2f 02 to 50- 4630 - 862 -86 62863 50- 4630- 862 -86 62863 50- 4630- 862 -86 62863 50- 4632 - 862 -86 65027 10- 4504 - 627 -62 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 8223 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 100820 8303 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 72991 8376 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 15 CHECK REGISTER MESSAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034F70 01/27/92 737.00 FRIDEN ALCATEL MAINT AGREEMENT 737.00 * * ** -CKS R R * R * * 034F73 01/27/92 264.00 SUSAN FRAME PT AC OFFICE 034F73 01/27/92 464.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 10- 2010 - 000 -00 728.00 * * R R R R R 10- 4504 - 646 -64 384432 8497 034G02 01/27/92 1,045.00 LIZ GEREB.I SERVICES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1,045.00 * R R R R R R 10- 4248 - 560 -56 40- 4580 - 803 -80 034G30 01/27/92 70.00 GENERAL SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 034G30 01/28/92 70.00 GENERAL SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 140.00 * * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 034G32 01/22/92 115.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE REQ 115.00 * * * * * ** 034G68 01/24/92 133.63 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. TELEPHONE 133.63 * R R R R R R 034G70 01/27/92 772.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 034G70 01/27/92 179.09 MARGARET GUST CRAFT SUPPLIES 951.09 * RRRRRR 034G72 01/22/92 114.00 GARY SMIEJA REPAIRS 034G72 01/22/92 80.00 GARY SMIEJA REPAIR PARTS 194.00 * R R R R R R 034G79 01/24/92 10,000.00 GREUPNER -JOE SERVICES 10,000.00 * *RRR RR 034G88 01/27/92 600.00 PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 600.00 * R R R R R R 034G93 01/27/92 288.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 02 -03 -92 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 8002 * ** -CKS 23- 4120 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 27- 4504- 667 -66 033706 8991 27- 4504 - 667 -66 033779 9022 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 384432 8497 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 40- 4580 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 288.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034G95 01/27/92 120.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 120.00 * 034G96 01/24/92 7.00 GUY SPEAKER CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 40- 4516 - 801 -80 7470 8523 7.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034H01 01/28/92 93.60 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 9033 93.60 * * ** * ** * ** -CKS 034H03 01/22/92 2,122.56 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 4221 8536 2,122.56 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034H33 01/28/92 401.08 HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034H33 01/28/92 104.08- HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286 - 220 -22 034H33 01/28/92 401.08 HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286 - 220 -22 034H33 01/28/92 297.00- HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286- 220 -22 401.08 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034H42 01/28/92 573.00 HERMAN MILLER INC. OFFICE SYSTEM 30- 1340 - 000 -00 723983 8083 573.00 * * * * * ** *** -CKS 034H56 01/28/92 169.85 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 27- 4544 - 662 -66 355493 8654 169.85 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034I12 01/28/92 700.46 IBM CORP DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 124790 7456 034I12 01/28/92 12,698.00 IBM CORP DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 DlHM08 7456 13,398.46 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034I42 01/22/92 2,945.00 INDUST SUPPLY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 879110 8320 2,945.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034J23 01/27/92 44.10 JR JOHNSON SUP PLANTS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 51711 8758 44.10 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 034J35 01/24/92 034J35 01/22/92 034J35 01/28/92 034J35 01/28/92 kk *kkk KNOX 034J68 01/28/92 034J68 01/28/92 034J68 01/28/92 034J68 01/28/92 034J68 01/28/92 kkkkkk KNOX 034J99 01/28/92 *kkkkk KNOX 034K09 01/24/92 kkkkkk KNOX 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/24/92 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/24/92 034K35 01/27/92 034K35 01/27/92 034K35 01/27/92 034K35 01/27/92 034K35 01/27/92 034K35 01/22/92 034K35 01/28/92 034K35 01/28/92 034K35 01/28/92 034K35 01/24/92 kkkkkk 034K57 01/22/92 kkkkkk 034L02 01/22/92 AMOUNT 289.20 81.91 300.00 327.00 998.11 35.15 202.51 182.64 31.86 29.48 481.64 40.00 40.00 32.54 32.54 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING ERIC FELTON ERIC FELTON ERIC FELTON ERIC FELTON ERIC FELTON JANET CANTON KAMAN INDUST TECH 22.58 KNOX COMM CREDIT 85.11 KNOX COMM CREDIT 69.42 KNOX COMM CREDIT . 22.47 KNOX COMM CREDIT 22.58- KNOX COMM CREDIT 22.58 KNOX COMM CREDIT 72.39 KNOX COMM CREDIT 64.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT 24.47 KNOX COMM CREDIT 57.90 KNOX COMM CREDIT 53.95 KNOX COMM CREDIT 21.98 KNOX COMM CREDIT 24.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT 12.46 KNOX COMM CREDIT 194.64 KNOX COMM CREDIT 49.96 KNOX COMM CREDIT 24.98 KNOX COMM CREDIT 802.25 * 183.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. 183.00 * 471.25 LABOR RELATIONS ASN MILEAGE CONT ED GENERAL SUPPLIES MTG EXP GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE /LOGIS REPAIR PARTS BLDG SUPPLIES BLDG SUPPPLIES BLDG SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BLGD SUPPLIES BLDG SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES BEER SERVICES 02 -03 -92 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4600 - 490 -49 9911 10- 4600 - 500 -50 9971 23- 4600 - 611 -61 23- 4600 - 611 -61 8542 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4540 - 560 -56 712355 8625 10- 2010 - 000 -00 003745 7045 10- 2010 - 000 -00 005891 7505 10- 2010 - 000 -00 003443 6890 10- 4504 - 318 -30 020208 8520 10- 4504 - 646 -64 003745 7045 10- 4504- 646 -64 003745 7045 10- 4540 - 520 -52 010254 8683 10- 4604 - 646 -64 010934 8832 10- 4604 - 646 -64 011121 8837 10- 4604 - 646 -64 010862 8817 10- 4604 - 646 -64 010889 8823 10- 4604 - 646 -64 011143 8852 10- 4604 - 646 -64 010365 8693 27- 2010 - 000 -00 017645 8188 27- 2010 - 000 -00 006822 7576 27- 4604 - 662 -66 020576 8764 40- 4504 - 801 -80 010222 8680 50- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4201 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS ** *-CKS kkk -CKS * ** -CKS **k-CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 471.25.* * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L09 01/28/92 553.20 J PATRICK MOORE CO ADVERTISING 27 -2010- 000 -00 CE1103 8922 553.20 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L28 01/24/92 49.53 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8369 034L28 01/24/92 141.60 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 7949 034L28 01/24/92 214.77 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8412 034L28 01/24/92 485.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00 8409 034L28 01/24/92 265.18 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8630 034L28 01/24/92 399.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8341 034L28 01/24/92 241.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8629 034L28 01/24/92 410.55 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8349 2,208.78 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L34 01/22/92 57.98 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 23- 2010 - 000 -00 57.98 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L54 01/22/92 309.75 LUNDS PLOWING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 15149 309.75 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L66 01/22/92 16.86 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIRS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 140542 8406 034L66 01/22/92 12.44 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 140611 8406 29.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L82 01/28/92 5.34 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 369330 034L82 01/28/92 25.84 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 369522 31.18 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034L84 01/27/92 180.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 180.00 * * ** * ** * ** -CKS 034L98 01/24/92 3.75 MIDWEST MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 P22317 8487 3.75 * ** -CKS :::*:; M 01/24/92 8,105.42 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 034M07 01/24/92 8,105.40 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 034M07 01/24/92 8,105.42- MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 8,105.40 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M12 01/27/92 680.00 METROQUIP INC LIFT RENTAL 27- 2010 - 000 -00 65115 7473 680.00 * *kkkkR * ** -CKS 034M16 01/28/92 783.00 McCAREN DESIGNS PLSNTS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 6105 8319 783.00 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M19 01/24/92 13.37 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 45.72 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 2,225.01 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 37.12 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 4.34 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 152.10 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 143.74 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 034M19 01/24/92 3.11 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 40 -2010- 000 -00 2,624.51 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M22 01/24/92 102.19 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 183137 8615 102.19 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M27 01/24/92 370.00 MERIT SUPPLY ICE MELT 10- 4504 - 318 -30 28927 8521 034M27 01/24/92 154.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 28897 8489 034M27 01/28/92 127.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 29040 8714 034M27 01/22/92 422.95 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 702 -70 29041 8809 034M27 01/28/92 487.25 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 28992 8720 034M27 01/27/92 317.85 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 29007 8740 034M27 01/24/92 478.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 28898 8488 034M27 01/24/92 378.10 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 4544 - 803 -80 28954 8610 034M27 01/22/92 169.50 MERIT SUPPLY ICE MELT /BAGS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 28953 8618 2,905.15 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M29 01/27/92 246.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 518200 034M29 01/27/92 23.22 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180- 000 -00 518200 034M29 01/27/92 193.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180- 000 -00 518200 462.22 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 034M32 01/27/92 399.08 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 10339 034M32 01/27/92 347.04 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 10361 034M32 01/22/92 399.40 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 10206 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 034M32 01/27/92 242.00 034M32 - 01/22/92 277.12 27- 4624 - 663 -66 1,664.64 * 034M33 01/24/92 485.59 MN. BAR MIX 485.59 * * * * * ** CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 034M35 01/22/92 244,847.00 EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 244,847.00 * * * * * ** EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 034M42 01/22/92 735.40 10- 4226 - 420 -42 735.40 * * * * * ** 10- 4226 - 420 -42 034M46 01/28/92 7.82 034M46 01/28/92 16.42 034M46 01/22/92 26.12 EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 436 -42 50.36 * * * * * ** TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 034M63 01/22/92 195.03 23- 4624 - 613 -61 64151 8736 195.03 * * * * * ** 10- 4210 - 140 -14 4124 034M68 01/27/92 98.69 034M68 01/28/92 8.08 034M68 01/28/92 34.45 034M68 01/28/92 91.56 034M68 01/28/92 9.63 034M68 01/28/92 125.97 034M68 01/28/92 11.31 034M68 01/28/92 938.99 034M68 01/28/92 53.13 1,371.81 * 034M69 01/28/92 81.20 81.20 * * * * * ** 034M80 01/24/92 44.72 034M80 01/24/92 44.72 89.44 * 034M81 01/27/92 107.40 107.40 * * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES MN PETRO SERV REPAIR PARTS METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -03 -92 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10268 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10189 10- 2010 - 000 -00 27731 8445 40- 4312 - 812 -80 505041 10- 2010 - 000 -00 6783 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624- 703 -70 505291 MN. BAR MIX 50- 2010- 000 -00 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 CELLULAR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 436 -42 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MCC /MIDWEST COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 64151 8736 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISNG 10- 4210 - 140 -14 4124 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 412 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 243943 8080 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 034M83 01/22/92 * * * * ** 034M85 01/24/92 034M85 01/22/92 * * * * ** s 034M92 01/22/92 * * * * ** 034M97 01/22/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 1034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 034M98 01/28/92 * * * * ** 034NO3 01/22/92 034NO3 01/22/92 * * * * ** 034N13 01/27/92 034N13 01/27/92 * * * * ** 034N16 01/22/92 034N16 01/22/92 034N16 01/22/92 AMOUNT 6.00 6.00 * 43.80 2,229.63 2,273.43 * 175.50 175.50 * 5,281.86 5,281.86 862.30 987.55 6,412.10 1,007.28 2,214.78 100.99 410.95 1,033.27 217.34 1,611.01 549.04 888.72 4,585.06 85.02 230.82 295.94 21,492.17 510.00 484.00 994.00 * 47.80 47.80 95.60 * 681.37 10.89 258.28 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES MN. WANNER MN. WANNER MONARCH MARKETING MPLS FINANCE DEPT MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MPLS SEWER & WATER MPLS SEWER & WATER MUZAK MUZAK NSP NSP NSP GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS REPAIRS REPAIRS ADVERTISING ADVERTISING POWER /LIGHT POWER /LIGHT POWER /LIGHT 02 -03 -92 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 12- 2010 - 000 -00 97435 7919 10- 4504 - 646 -64 13537 10- 4540 - 646 -64 13506 8517 50- 4516 - 820 -82 167595 40- 2010: 000 -00 10- 4254 - 440 -44 10- 4254- 520 -52 10- 4254 - 540 -54 10- 4254 - 540 -54 10- 4254- 646 -64 10- 4254- 646 -64 23- 4254 - 612 -61 27- 4254 - 662 -66 27- 4254 - 664 -66 28- 4254 - 702 -70 30- 4254 - 784 -78 40- 4254 - 801 -80 40- 4254- 803 -80 50- 4254 - 821 -82 50- 4254 - 841 -84 50- 4254- 861 -86 40- 4248 - 801 -80 30935 8798 40- 4248 - 801 -80 30934 8797 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 862 -86 23- 2010 - 000 -00 26- 2010 - 000 -00 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 22 CHECK REGISTER MESSAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034N16 01/22/92 46.68 NSP - POWER /LIGHT 034N16 01/22/92 444.04 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4624 - 784 -78 498346 1,441.26 * 496519 9067 RRRRRR * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 784 -78 034N22 01/22/92 233.63 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 04987 233.63 * R R R* R M 034N31 01/27/92 56.20 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 034N31 01/28/92 217.84 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 274.04 * RRRRRR 034N36 01/28/92 38.12 NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.12 * RRRRRR 034N72 01/24/92 188.00 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 034N72 01/24/92 1,647.45 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 034N72 01/24/92 334.55 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 2,170.00 RRRRRR 034N76 01/24/92 96.00 NTCC REPAIR PARTS 96.00 R R R R R R 034N82 01/28/92 77.33 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 034N82 01/22/92 174.77 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 034N82 01/22/92 317.24 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 569.34 RRRRRR 034N88 01/27/92 290.00 J THOMAS NELSON AC INSTRUCTOR 290.00 * RRRRRR 034N97 01/27/92 181.00 LIA NICKLOW PT AC MAINT 181.00 * RRRRRR 034017 01/27/92 82.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 034017 01/22/92 27.50 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 034017 01/27/92 4,114.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTERS 4,223.50 * * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 D25782 8414 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 192249 8738 23- 4624- 613 -61 191833 8538 23- 4624- 613 -61 191989 8546 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4120 - 612 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 240 -24 157019 10- 4504 - 510 -51 156852 10- 4901 - 440 -44 10024 8529 02 -03 -92 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 40- 2010 - 000-00 41- 2010- 000 -00 * ** -CKS 50- 4304 - 841 -84 446991 * ** -CKS 30- 4624 - 784 -78 498346 30- 4624 - 784 -78 496519 9067 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 784 -78 510631 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 04987 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 D25782 8414 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 192249 8738 23- 4624- 613 -61 191833 8538 23- 4624- 613 -61 191989 8546 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4120 - 612 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 240 -24 157019 10- 4504 - 510 -51 156852 10- 4901 - 440 -44 10024 8529 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P'0. 4 MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034024 01/22/92 209.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 32022 034024 01/28/92 508.80 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 32020 9006 034024 01/28/92 533.55 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 32023 9007 034024 01/22/92 391.70 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 32021 1,643.05 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034036 01/28/92 474.12 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 116453 7441 034036 01/27/92 51.00 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE REPAIRS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 116454 7442 525.12 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034050 01/28/92 597.00 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782-78 61817 8860 597.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034099 01/27/92 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 192.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034P30 01/22/92 402.14 PP�EPP�SII COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 699 A BeTTC!N6 MIyx Mix 50- 2010 - 000 -00 oA 40"2.14 * rgg_ �JO 4692 842 r 2 &8;6 534P20 1/27/92 27.50 * Paustis & Sons Mix 50- 4632 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 034P44 01/27/92 1,287.61 PHYSIO CONTROL EQUIP 10- 4901 - 440 -44 B80291 7665 1,287.61 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034P48 01/28/92 44.40 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 7461 44.40 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034P78 01/28/92 26.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 784 -78 69452 034P78 01/27/92 13.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 784 -78 69626 39.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034P82 01/27/92 361.75 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 50-4632- 822 -82 529746 03082 01/22/92 98.50 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 527824 460.25 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 034Q16 01/27/92 56.18 QUALITY WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 668241 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 034Q16 01/27/92 56.18 034Q16 01/22/92 60.88 034Q16 01/22/92 56.18 8599 MONICA RUDQUIST 229.42 * kRkkRk 034Q20 01/24/92 49.56 034Q20 01/24/92 41.16 SHOES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 90.72 * RkRRkR RED WING SHOES SHOES 034R01 01/28/92 80.60 RED WING SHOES SHOES 80.60 * RkRRkR REM SUPPLIES 034R12 01/24/92 2.54 034R12 01/24/92 17.16 30- 4504 - 781 -78 1474 19.70 * *kRRkk GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 034R15 01/27/92 246.00 034R15 01/27/92 480.00 REM SUPPLIES 726.00 * kkRRkR 01717 9064 034R21 01/22/92 87.55 034R21 01/22/92 95.20 034R21 01/22/92 173.40 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO 356.15 034R22 01/27/92 379.40 034R22 01/28/92 929.50 034R22 01/28/92 355.62 034R22 01/27/92 167.54 034R22 01/28/92 268.38 2,100.44 kkkk *k 034R33 01/27/92 4,857.62 034R33 01/27/92 156.50 5,014.12 " k *RRRR 034R35 01/22/92 201.20 201.20 RRRRRR 034R49 01/24/92 38.78 QUALITY WINE MIX QUALITY WINE MIX QUALITY WINE MIX QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR PARTS OIL FILTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4632- 842 -84 668240 50- 4632 - 842 -84 667978 50- 4632 - 862 -86 667985 10- 4540- 560 -56 83661 8601 10- 4540 - 560 -56 84361 8684 30- 4504 - 783 -78 15804 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 50928 8457 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 674171 8599 MONICA RUDQUIST PT MAINT 23- 4120- 612 -61 MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 228399 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 228399 RED WING SHOES SHOES 40- 2010 - 000 -00 228399 REM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 10- 4642 - 646 -64 1429 8818 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 1474 8322 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 01709 9065 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 01496 REM SUPPLIES COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624 - 784 -78 01717 9064 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 2010- 000 -00 REX DISTR. MIX 50- 2010 - 000 -00 RICHFIELD PLUMB CO PLUMBING 10- 4248 - 520 -52 8738 8806 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 124813 8702 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS *RR -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS rt 1992 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 8829 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * ** -CKS 38.78 * * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 57342 7491 034863 01/22/92 70.29 ROGERS PAINTING GENERAL. SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 70.29 * *Rk *kk * ** -CKS 30- 4624- 784 -78 034899 01/28/92 56.20 8739 RUTH SCHMOLL PETTY CASH 8645 56.20 * 30- 4580 - 784 -78 8672 30- 4580 - 784 -78 8739 034S03 01/24/92 9.81 S.T. ROBB SCREWS * ** -CKS 9.81 * 10- 4201 - 260 -26 kkk *R* 034S07 01/28/92 57.24 SPRUCE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.24 * 034S10 01/28/92 23.50 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.50 * * * * * ** 034S25 01/27/92 111.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST /GOODS SOLD 111.00 * kkkk ** 034S42 01/27/92 152.80 SEARS GENERAL SUPPLIES 034S42 01/27/92 316.35 SEARS TOOLS 034S42 01/28/92 75.00 SEARS TOOLS 034S42 01/27/92 239.39 SEARS TOOLS 034S42 01/27/92 195.25 SEARS TOOLS 978.79 * 034S54 01/27/92 75.40 STAR TRIBUNE DUES 75.40 * 034S72 01/22/92 11.00 STREICHERS SUPPLIES 11.00 * 034S73 01/28/92 1,885.55 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PRO ENG SERV 1,885.55 * k * * * ** * ** -CKS 02 -03 -92 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 8829 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 57342 7491 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 784 -78 025152 8807 * ** -CKS 30- 4624- 784 -78 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 784 -78 8739 30- 4580 - 782 -78 8645 30- 4580 - 782 -78 8645 30- 4580 - 784 -78 8672 30- 4580 - 784 -78 8739 * ** -CKS 30- 4204 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 408791 10- 4201 - 260 -26 3 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -03 -92 PAGE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 034577 01/24/92 87.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 133798 034577 01/24/92 145.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 159832 034577 01/24/92 86.25 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 159915 034577 01/24/92 7.77 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 160063 034577 01/24/92 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 134069 426.82 " RRRRRR * ** -CKS 034592 01/27/92 14.80 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10650 8986 034592 01/24/92 146.55 SYSTEM SUPPLY DISKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 010538 8864 034592 01/27/92 193.52 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10437 8812 034592 01/27/92 20.01 SYSTEM SUPPLY PRINTER RIBBON 10- 4516 - 440 -44 010419 374.88 * R R R R R R * ** -CKS 034T02 01/24/92 15.00 TAMARACK REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 200033 8426 034T02 01/24/92 108.76 TAMARACK LUMBER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 200437 8444 123.76 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS 034T26 01/27/92 256.40 THERMAL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783-78 M22502 8805 256.40 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS 034T30 01/24/92 12,538.95 THORPE DISTR. BEER 50- 2010- 000 -00 12,538.95 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS 034T40 01/24/92 102.17 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 425039 034T40 01/24/92 47.92 TOLL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 801 -80 161887 8609 034T40 01/24/92 62.25 TOLL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 162547 8037 212.34 * RRRRRR * ** -CKS 034T96 01/24/92 401.40 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 30710 8710 401.40 * RRRRRR **A,-CKS 034U05 01/27/92 49.36 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE 12- 2010 - 000 -00 49.36 * R R R R R R * ** -CKS 034U14 01/24/92 21.58 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 8608 21.58 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS • r C 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 034U25 01/27/92 034U25 01/24/92 034U25 01/24/92 034U25 01/24/92 * * * * ** SERV 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 034U27 01/28/92 * * * * ** 213.68 034V05 01/27/92 034V06 01/28/92 034V06 01/28/92 034V06 01/28/92 * * * * ** 168.12 034V30 01/28/92 * * * * ** 034V57 01/22/92 * * * * ** 034V80 01/24/92 034V80 01/22/92 034V80 01/27/92 * * * * ** * 034W08 01/24/92 034W08 01/22/92 034W08 01/27/92 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 48.90 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 384.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 384.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 384.00- UNIVERSAL MED SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 432.90 * US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 02 -03 -92 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4510 - 440 -44 763638 8899 25- 2010 - 000 -00 6107 8364 25- 4504 - 385 -30 6107 8364 25- 4504- 385 -30 6107 8364 407.40 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 364.05 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 17.57 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 131.21 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 51.99 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 172.56 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 667 -66 1,279.84 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 213.68 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 784 -78 153.10 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 168.12 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 2,959.52 * 27.39 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. TELEPHONE 30- 2010 - 000 -00 8982 27.39 * 18.33 VETERAN ADVERTISING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 18.34 VETERAN ADVERTISING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 18.33 VETERAN ADVERTISING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 55.00 * 294.21 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 11916 8749 294.21 * 293.40 VIKING INDUS CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 648 -64 435326 8703 293.40 * 24.72 VOSS LIGHTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 298982 8585 439.62 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHTS 10- 4606 - 646 -64 299156 8605 136.20 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 299147 8498 600.54 152.80 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 249168 8607 252.96 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 603268 8638 105.64 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIRS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 255059 8804 511.40 * * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 034W13 01/22/92 7,496.63 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP PUMP REPAIR 034W13 01/22/92 882.36 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIRS 034W13 01/28/92 3,250.20 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIRS 11,629.19 * * * * * ** 034W44 01/24/92 57.55 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 57.55 * * * * * ** 034W49 01/24/92 89.66 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 034W49 01/24/92 89.66- WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 034W49 01/24/92 87.66 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT SERVICE REPAIR 87.66 *. * * * * ** 034W76 01/28/92 62.85 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 034W76 01/28/92 245.48 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY SUPPLIES 308.33 034W99 01/27/92 252.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 252.00 * * * * ** 034X05 01/22/92 821.56 XEROX CORP MAINT 034X05 01/22/92 480.38 XEROX CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 034X05 01/28/92 123.63 XEROX CORP PRINTING 1,425.57 * * * * ** 034Z14 01/24/92 171.93 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR-PARTS 171.93 * * * * ** 034Z99 01/27/92 135.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 034Z99 01/27/92 69.63 BOBO ZINN CRAFT SUPPLIES 204.63 * :::L 28 01/24/92 152.13 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 152.13 * * * * * ** 127,485.36 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,992.68 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS ,J 02 -03 -92 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 18290 8413 40- 4248 - 801 -80 18271 8616 40- 4248 - 801 -80 18478 8815 * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 92758 8678 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631 10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631 10- 2010 - 000 -00 31913 8631 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 81999 8728 27- 4636- 667 -66 81999 8728 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 510 -51 10- 4504- 510 -51 8663 10- 4600 - 140 -14 *** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8675 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8348 * ** -CKS r s 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR 15,414.38 FUND 23 TOTAL 721.00 FUND 25 TOTAL 129,573.89 FUND 26 TOTAL 70,615.26 FUND 27 TOTAL 2,558.08 FUND 28 TOTAL 21.94 FUND 29 TOTAL 22,313.16 FUND 30 TOTAL 276,236.33 FUND 40 TOTAL 444.04 FUND 41 TOTAL 47,790.09 FUND 50 TOTAL 695,166.21 TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 02 -03 -92 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE