The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-02-18_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1992 ROLLCALL RESOLUTIONS OF CONDOLENCE - Doris Parker - Bruce Gates ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of Commissioners as to HRA items and by the agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine and will be separate discussion of such items unless requests, in which case the item will be in its normal sequence on the Agenda. 'the Consent Agenda items is made by the Council Members as to Council items. All and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and enacted by one motion. There will be no a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so removed from the Consent Agenda and considered EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of February 3, 1992 * II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of February 3, 1992 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to-pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. 'Amendment to Ordinance No. 812 - Regulating Television and Radio Antennas and Towers B. Amendment to Ordinance No. 114 - Moratorium on Construction of Towers, Antennas and Dish Antennas C. Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition D. Rezoning and Lot Division -- Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition E. Set Hearing Date (03/02/92) * 1. Review of Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Home Occupation - 7121 Glouchester Avenue III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS A. Sewer Jet (Contd from 02/03/92) * B. Public Works Building Lighting * C. Rotary Mower '�. D. Turf Sweeper - Park Maintenance E.' Gasoline - Braemar Golf Course F. Fertilizer - Braemar Golf Course Agenda Edina City Council February 18, 1992 Page 2 * G. 3 -Gang Mower - Braemar Golf Course' 2 * H. Production Services - "About Town" Magazine P.M. * I. Printing - "About Town" Magazine Mon V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS Regular Council Meeting 7:00 A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of February 02/11/92 Chambers B. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date (03/02/92) - Blake Road 18 C. Schedule of Hearings - Draft.Edina Code 6:00 * D. Approval of I -494 JPO Professional Services Agreement Clubhouse VI. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 6 Regular Council Meeting A. Ronald Edblom Letter - Massage Ordinance Requirements P.M. Council B. Cellular One - 4940 Viking Drive (Pentagon Office Park) Mon * C. Petition to Vacate Easement - 5220 Lincoln Drive (Lincoln Apartments) - Set PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION Hearing Date Open VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Mon Apr A. MTC Bus Route 35H Regular Council Meeting VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL Council IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Apr 27 A. Local Redistricting /Precinct Boundaries 5:00 X. FINANCE Chamber Tues A. Year End Executive Summaries - Enterprise Funds 28 * B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/18/92: Total $988,958.62 and for Edinborough Park confirmation of payment of Claims dated 01/31/92: Total $419,500.81 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Mar 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Mar 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Wed Mar 18 Annual Council /Boards /Commissions Dinner 6:00 P.M. Braemar Clubhouse Mon Apr 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Apr 7 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION 'Polls Open 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM Mon Apr 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Apr 27 Board of Review 5:00 P.M. Council Chamber Tues Apr 28 Annual Volunteers Reception 5:00 P.M. Edinborough Park o�1 O ' \Q1888 IUBB RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS, the life of Doris Parker ended on January 30, 1992, after months of illness; and WHEREAS, Doris Parker began employment at the City of Edina in 1955 as Secretary of the Finance Department and continued full -time for 20 years; and WHEREAS, as Finance Secretary she was responsible for typing the City's budget in its entirety, which she did for 25 years; and WHEREAS, after her retirement, Doris was always willing to help the City on a part -time basis - -not only with budget preparation, but wherever needed within other departments; and WHEREAS, she was very active in her church and community, and she touched many people in a caring, sensitive and gentle way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby extends its heartfelt sympathy to the children of Doris Parker and their families; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be entered in the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that a copy be presented to her family. ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 1992. Mayor Pro Tem A- 0 \NCORPOAA1w9/ 1eee RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS, the life of Bruce Gates ended suddenly on February 13, 1992; and WHEREAS, Bruce Gates began his employment with the City of Edina in November, 1986, as a Firefighter /Paramedic; and WHEREAS, during his five year career he performed all duties in an exemplary manner and was a valued employee of the Edina Fire Department; and WHEREAS, he was a trustworthy, energetic and outgoing employee with a genuine love for people and his death is viewed as a great loss; NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby extends its heartfelt sympathy to his family; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be entered in the minutes book of the Edina City Council and that a copy be presented to his family. ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 1992. Mayor Pro Tem MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 3, 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve HRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve BRA Minutes of January 21, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 3, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling $29,532.04. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1992 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049707 02/12/92 5,305.94 BRW INC ARCH FEES 5,305.94 * kkkkkk 049736 02/12/92 9,841.03 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL FEES 9,841.03 * k k 041 *;5 02/12/92 5,000.00 INGRAM EXCAVATING RES AMENITIES 5,000.00 kkkkkk 049826 02/12/92 120.00 THE URBAN LAND DUES 120.00 * 049827 02/12/92 6.00 ALLAN B BOHANNON REFUND 6.00 * 049828 02/12/92 3,238.44 HENN CTY TREAS OVERPAYMENT 3,238.44 * k k k k k k 23,511.41 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA 23,511.41 TOTAL 02 -18 -92 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 1319 - 132 -12 64581 * ** -CKS 01- 4218 - 132 -12 265053 * ** -CKS 01 -1315- 132 -12 452 * ** -CKS 01- 4000 - 134 -12 01- 3140 - 131 -12 01- 4000 - 134 -12 k k k - C K S MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3. 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED lotion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 21, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. REPORT PRESENTED ON DRAFT I -494 EIS: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED 4/6/92 Engineer Hoffman introduced the following Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) personnel: William Crawford, Metro Engineer; Jim Povich, Assistant District Engineer; Craig Robinson, Project Manager for I -494 Environmental Impact Study (EIS); also Tony Hepplemann, BRW Consulting Engineer; Larry Laukka, IMPROVE I -494 (private sector) and Connie Kozlak, Metropolitan Council transportation staff. He stated that a public hearing on the draft EIS has been scheduled for April, 1992. The primary issues for Edina would be: 1) loss of access at the I- 494/169 interchange (old County Road 18) and its relationship to the East Bush Lake /I -494 interchange alternatives, and 2) impact on surrounding properties at Highway 100 /I -494 interchange. The major change would be construction of a full access interchange at East Bush Lake (eastbound /westbound) to provide access to Edina's interchange center at W. 77th Street /TH 100 where current traffic overloads. Presentation by Consultant Tony Hepplemann, BRW consultant and project manager for reconstruction of I -494, explained that the project runs from I -394 on the north and west through Eden Prairie to the Minnesota River on the east, approximately 18 miles. The purpose of the project is to address current capacity deficiencies, provide additional capacity for anticipated future demand and to address safety problems that currently exist in the I -494 corridor. The number of trips in the corridor are projected to increase by approximately 45% by year 2010 (corridor design target year). Currently there are approximately 3 million vehicle trips in the corridor with a projected 4.56 million by 2010. Other elements that the project will address are: 1. Physical design - a number of locations have substandard geometric alignment. 2. Shoulders - four feet wide where a twelve foot is desirable. 3. Bridges - less than the desired clearance between the bridge bottom and the pavement. 4. Ramp spacing - existing spacing between on and off ramps has caused congestion and accidents. 5. Drainage - a number of locations have standing water after heavy rainfall. Alternatives considered but dropped early in the process: 1. New facility /new location - would require significant right of way acquisition. 2. Light rail transit - would not make enough difference in corridor demand. 3. Access at Excelsior Boulevard or other locations. Alternatives being studied: 1. No build - maintain status quo with some maintenance improvements. 2. Transportation system management - ramp metering, HOV bypass lanes and signal timing at intersections. 3. Build alternatives - (i) widen mainline to provide additional lanes, and (ii) upgrade interchanges. Build Alternatives: 1. Add one lane in each direction on I -494 mainline. A. HOV lane, or B. general purpose lane. 2. Add two lanes in each direction on I -494 mainline. A. HOV.lane and general purpose lane,'lor B. two general purpose lanes. Under the build alternatives, significant upgrading would be necessary to provide full acces's at these interchanges: East Bush Lake Road, West 77th Street /TH 100, France Avenue, and Normandale /84th Street. It would not be possible to access I- 494 at East Bush Lake Road and then to go north or south at TH 100 /Normandale Boulevard. Similarily, it would not be possible to get from TH 100 to East.Bush Lake Road. At West 77th Street, that access would allow vehicles to go south on Normandale as well as east /west on I -494. Several alternatives are being considered for the interchanges at East Bush Lake and West 77th Street. In addition, the City of Bloomington is considering a bridge across I -494 at Nord Avenue that would tie the south side of I -494 to the north side to provide alternative access other than at France Avenue, TH 100 and East Bush Lake Road. Another alternative is the possibility of a loop in the southeast quadrant of East Bush Lake Road /I -494 because of the Soo Line Railroad which runs just to the west. Current MnDOT policy prohibits an at -grade railroad crossing of a entrance /exit ramp from a freeway because of potential backup traffic onto the ramp /freeway if a train is passing. Another reason for the loop instead of a direct ramp is because the land in the southwest quadrant is parkland and was purchased with federal funds. Policy states that the land cannot be used for transportation purposes if there are other alternatives available. Under this alternative there would still be a ramp crossing the railroad. In order to provide full access without crossing the'railroad, a further alternative is being considered that would provide loops in both quadrants. However, this would eliminate substantial office space and some parkland adding to the right of way acquisition cost. At West 77th Street /TH 100 several options are being considered to bring the existing loops up to current design standards as to radius. To do that it would mean the taking of several homes along the.east side of TH 100 as well as several office buildings, a gas station and restaurant along the west side. An alternative to a loop for northbound TH 100 to West 77th Street would be a direct ramp which would avoid the taking of homes east of TH 100. At TH 169/I -494 major improvements are being considered. The current diamond interchange is a diamond interchange with frontage roads that serve the businesses immediately adjacent to the freeway. The goal is to eliminate.those intersections on TH 169 and provide for direct movements. In doing that, the existing access to the local businesses will be 'eliminated and will be replaced by a ramp that exists onto Washington Avenue which will be tied to Prairie Center to the west by a frontage road. Further, ramps are being considered to the south at Highwood Drive. Graphics illustrating the following alternatives were presented: Draft EIS Figure 3.11 - T.H. 100 /Normandale Blvd. (C.S.A.H. 34) Interchange Area (Subalternative 2 Option) Partial directional with loops at T.H. 100 Diamond with loop or folded diamond at E. Bush Lake Road Folded diamond or diamond with loop at W. 77th Street Reconstruct France Avenue 84th Street /Normandale Boulevard at -grade Draft EIS Figure 3.10 - T.H. 100 /Normandale Boulevard Interchange Area (Subalternative 1 Option) Semi - directional with loops at T.H. 100 Single point diamond at East Bush Lake Road Minimum improvement at W. 77th Street Reconstruct France Avenue interchange 84th Street /Normandale Boulevard at -grade Draft EIS Figure 3.9 - TH 5/212 - TH 169 /C.S.A.H. 18 Interchange Area (Subalternatives lA and 1B) Split diamond between Prairie Center Drive and Washington Avenue Full access at East Bush Lake Road Beneficial Environment Impacts 1. Level of service - With addition of one lane in each direction, ramp meters and HOV lanes: level of service "D" on the mainline, will accommodate the 45% increase in vehicle demand, will reduce congestion on local streets, will provide 60% better travel time. 2. Safety - Will reduce the average accident rate, 15% fewer accidents predicted on I -494 and 20% fewer accidents in the corridor. 3. Air Quality - 43% reduction in carbon monoxide emissions in the corridor. 4. Energy - 88 less energy used. 5. Drainage - Would upgrade the storm drainage system and eliminate periodic flooding of low spots on I -494. Negative Environment Impacts 1. Right of way acquisition - Would result in residential displacement of 270 to 290 households (0 to 9 Edina households) and would displace 80 to 158 businesses affecting 2,200 to 3,200 workers (0 -45 businesses in Edina affecting 0 -300 employees). 2. Reduction in tax revenues - Estimated at between $2.2 million and $3.9 million ($0.0 to $0.9 million in Edina). 3. Parks and wetlands - Will impact seven of the parks abutting the project. Will also impact numerous wetlands and the Nine Mile Creek floodplain. In Edina a sliver of Braemar Park may be needed for the widening of TH 169 and a ponding location is being considered in the northwest quadrant at TH 169/I -494. Also, the grade on East Bush Lake Road will need to be raised seven feet. 4. Construction - Will reduce capacity on segments under construction and increase noise. Project Costs - For adding one lane project costs would be between $540 and $610 million; for two lanes costs would be between $580 and $650 million. Costs for acquisition of right of way would be between $140 and $165 million. Project Schedule - Proposed schedule as follows: Draft EIS - March 1992; Public Hearing - April 1992; Final EIS - November 1992; Record of Decision from Federal Highway Administration - May 1993; First Construction 1997 (pending funding). Larry Laukka, IMPROVE 494 (private sector participant),, explained that his involvement began after the 1984 -85 corridor study was completed to deal with new issues related to highway improvement (travel demand management and land use equations, etc.) The Metropolitan Council asked for a group to be formed (IMPROVE 494) to look at these issues, to help fund an environmental impact study and to look at ways to energize the system. It became obviously that funding would be a key issue and the group began to look at,,that as it appeared that historical methods of funding these kinds of improvements have evaporated. IMPROVE 494 believes local government and the private sector should be involved in the question of funding the project. A significant factor is the present 20- 30% vacant office space on the I -494 Corridor which, if filled, would quickly compound the impact on I -494. There is a lot of land yet to be developed between Highway 7 and the airport which, if developed as office or warehouse, would further exacerbate the problem. IMPROVE 494 began to look at ways to deal with traffic congestion in the interim until the system is expanded and the buzz word became "travel demand management" IMPROVE 494 then worked with the public sector to try to put more people in less vehicles in the corridor in an attempt to put less demand on the system. Lacking a good bus system and the penchant for doubling'up in vehicles the outlook is rather gloomy for travel demand management. There is little" recourse except for traffic to back up into the public community streets in the five corridor cities and political life will become more difficult. In summary, Mr. Laukka said that in four years on the IMPROVE 494 committee he had not seen much enthusiastic support from the five cities Joint Powers Organization to deal with this issue except in the area of generating the plans and specifications, i.e, building the system. There has been very little interest by the public sector and no political incentive to begin to deal with the tough question of what to do when real congestion backs up onto city streets. Mr. Laukka encouraged the Council Members to take political initiative and leadership to deal with the issue. If the I -494 system is to be improved, some of the funding will be laid on local government and the local tax base. Council Comment /Action Engineer Hoffman commented that the report on the Draft EIS was to inform the Council of the issue's so that staff could receive direction on preparing a Council position for the EIS public hearing in April 1992. With regard to the options at West 77th Street /TH 100, Mayor Richards asked how the impacted homes and businesses would be approached. Engineer Hoffman suggested they be made aware of the public hearing in April 1992 and the potential taking of those properties. Further, Edina will have a chance to approve layouts and take a position before construction. Bill Crawford, MnDOT Metro Engineer, clarified that state law requires MnDOT must have city council approval for any layout that takes right of way, changes access or grade. In cases of dispute, the law would allow the Commissioner of Transportation to appeal a disputed layout to the Metropolitan Council who would mediate the issue. In response to Member Rice's questions on ramp metering, Mr. Crawford explained.that metering increases freeway capacity, cuts accidents in half and increases transit ridership. It also backs up traffic into local streets. In the next 10 to 15 years all mainlines will be metered to level out the traffic. Member Smith asked why the corridor traffic is not deflected further south. Jim Povich, MnDOT Assistant District Engineer, explained that a second ring concept is inconsistent with regional policy and no project would move forward without a consensus of the regional agencies. There is adequate vacant property for freeway expansion for twenty years in the first ring. Studies have shown that to continue to keep developing the urban sprawl is very costly as far as not only the transportation facilities that are required but sewer /water, police, and other services as well. The growth projections for the next 20 years for the Twin Cities show a modest population growth. Plans such as presented for I -494 are plans that can manage the problems perceived. In response to questions from the audience, Mayor Richards gave_ background information on the Council's involvement to date in the I -494 project in an effort to work with the other corridor cities to obtain gas tax funds for the I -494 corridor.. He suggested that, to assist the Council in considering the various options that have been presented in the draft EIS, staff develop specific recommendations pertaining to Edina. Member Kelly made a motion directing staff to review further the options in the draft EIS affecting the City of Edina, specifically the 77th Street/TH 100 interchange and related alternatives, and to present recommendations at the - April 6, 1992 Council meeting. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REPORT PRESENTED ON TRACY AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council reviewed a traffic study on Tracy Avenue from West 66th Street to West 70th Street at its December 16, 1991 meeting. Council then directed staff to send out notices to the affected residents for a public hearing on the issue. Approximately 400 homeowners received notice and an abbreviated version of the report. Written response in petition or letter form were received from 129 residents opposed to any traffic diversion and from 17 in favor. Presentation by Consultant Dennis Eyler, Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch Consulting Engineers, explained that, as requested by the City, they had completed a traffic study and analysis of the Tracy Avenue neighborhood. The study was ordered in response to concerns for the amount of "through" traffic cutting through the neighborhood. The study area was bounded on the north and east by Nine Mile Creek, on the south by West 70th Street, and on the west by Valley View Road and Antrim Road. City staff has previously documented that there was a significant amount of "through" traffic using Tracy Avenue as a short cut through the subject neighborhood. The staff's conclusion that this traffic was primarily travelling between the Crosstown Highway /Tracy Avenue interchange and the Edina Industrial Park was reasonable and that it was primarily due to the congestion and delay that exists on the Crosstown Highway and Highway 100. Based on a cordon count of the neighborhood by the City in October, 1991, 5,770 vehicles were entering or exiting the neighborhood daily. The estimated 320 homes within the neighborhood generated about 3,200 daily vehicle trips. The difference of 2,570 trips per day is significant. There is "through" traffic on other neighborhood streets such as Limerick, Hillside Lane, Galway and Brook Drive. It was assumed that no improvements could be easily implemented within the near future to improve the operation of the Crosstown Highway or Highway 100. Therefore, "through" traffic would need to be diverted from the neighborhood streets to collector streets serving the area, i.e. Valley View Road, Antrim Road and West 70th Street. Possible Alternatives: 1. Alternating pattern of STOP signs on streets with a significant amount of "through" traffic. Poor STOP sign compliance should be- expected. 2. A series of multi -way STOPS along Tracy Avenue from West 66th Street to West 70th Street. Poor STOP sign compliance should be expected. 3. Improving the collector streets by changing the.geometrics at the intersections of Valley View Road /Antrim Road and Antrim Road/West 70th Street. 4. Installing various patterns of traffic diverters within the neighborhood. 5. Closing Tracy Avenue between West 66th Street and Hillside Circle, and between Brook Drive and McGuire Road, and closing the intersection of Brook Drive and Hillside Lane. Two of the identified alternative actions tested would be effective in diverting the "through" traffic from the neighborhood streets to the collector streets.. Both of these involve installation of traffic diverters within the neighborhood. Significant changes in neighborhood travel patterns will result. Both traffic diverter patterns virtually cut the neighborhood in two. Pattern B cuts the neighborhood in half at West 68th Street allowing no movement between the north and south halves. Pattern D cuts the neighborhood in half diagonally from northeast to southwest and allows no movement between the southeast and northwest halves. The cost to construct permanent traffic diverters is estimated at $10,000 per intersection or $40,000 for Pattern B and $30,000 for Pattern D. Should the City would wish to implement a neighborhood traffic improvement project for the study area it is recommended that Traffic Diverter Pattern D be selected. Diverters would be constructed at W. 66th /Hillside, W. 68th /Galway and Brook Drive /Tracy Avenue. Due to the significant change in the residents travel patterns and costs for permanent diverters it is recommended that the plan be implemented on a temporary /trial basis and monitored. Advance signing would also be helpful on the collector streets and approaches to the neighborhood. Experience shows that once diverters are installed and the "through" traffic problem is no longer present, all that remains are the diverters which continue to be an inconvenience. After time, the neighborhood requests removal. A further consideration would be an increase in emergency response time with the installation of diverters. Public Comment: Speaking in opposition to the implementing of traffic diverters in the area were: Del Smith, 5613 Brook Drive; Al Wise, 6713 Galway Drive; Mike Macken; 5700 Brook Drive; Al Wise, 6713 Galway Drive; Ambrose Zeller, 6812 Antrim Road; Jeannette Hansen, 5704 Brook Drive; Karl Leupold, 6708 Limerick Lane; Jeff Cauble, 5700 Lois Lane; Candice Rishavy, 5817 McGuire Road; Bob Harter, 5504 Hillside Court; Dennis Johnson, 6700 Cahill Road; Lora Gitzen, 6901 Antrim; Mary Lilja, 5809 McGuire Road; Tom Donnelly, 5712 Creek Valley Road; Mark Brunsvold, 5713 Brook Drive; Hugh Sweeney, 6809 Hillside Lane; Mary Wenborg, 5801 Creek Valley Road; Jan Bordonaro, 6009 Birchcrest Drive; Gordon Nelson, 6712 Hillside Lane; Dick Weinrib, 5612 W. 66th Street; Ron Counton, 5609 Hillside Court; and Leander Lippert, 6600 Limerick Lane. Speaking in favor of doing something to make Tracy Avenue a safe street were: Janet Borgeson, 6709 Tracy Avenue; John and Jill Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue; Mr. Frankfort, 6613 Tracy Avenue; Todd Johnson, 6705 Tracy Avenue; and Kristin Johnson, 6721 Tracy Avenue. Engineer Hoffman explained that 20% of roadways in Edina are collector streets. These roadways move traffic out of neighborhoods to busier streets and were designated as collector streets previous to 1973. The highway system in a metropolitan area has main components, e.g., freeway, arterial, collector and local streets. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards concluded that the six major issues were: 1) signage (directional or instructional), 2) signage (control /enforcement), 3) speed control (monitoring /enforcement), 4) diverters, 5) sidewalks, and 6) issues of traffic from other areas. i.e. traffic off Highway 100, Crosstown and the Industrial Park. Following consideration of each issue the Council agreed to consider the following further: 1) signage, 2) stop signs /traffic lights, and 3) sidewalks. Member Paulus made a motion to continue action to March 2, 1992, and to direct staff to bring back further information and specific proposals on signage, stop signs /traffic lights, and sidewalk cost estimates. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR PETER ANDREA ADDITION Planner Larsen indicated that preliminary plat approval was granted for the Peter Andrea Addition (6966 Valley View Road) on December 16, 1991, for a three lot (2 new) plat. The proponents have now presented the final plat for Council approval. Lot sizes and dimensions remain the same as those given preliminary approval. Planner Larsen said the development agreement is similar to that for the Jyland Whitney Addition, and covers tree removal, retaining walls and erosion control protection. Staff would recommend final plat approval subject to: 1) Subdivision dedication based on an unimproved land value of $300,000.00, and 2) Execution and recording of the Development Agreement. Planner Larsen stated that comments have been received from the attorney for Daniel Spiegel whose property is immediately south of the subject plat. The comments have been reviewed by staff and the City Attorney and staff would continue to recommend the Development Agreement prepared by the City Attorney. Jane Kuhar, attorney for Peter Andrea, Inc., indicated that she had received and reviewed the proposed Developer's Agreement and found it acceptable. George Borer, attorney for Daniel Spiegel, explained that while the proposed development agreement is similar to that for the Jyland- Whitney Addition, it is Mr. Spiegel's desire is to preserve the site and to minimize impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Borer said his client would like would like some assurance that this would happen. Engineer Hoffman said he would do his normal review on issues such as drainage, grading and driveways. In addition, the Building Official and the City Planner would conduct their normal reviews. Daniel Spiegel, 7104 Valley View Road, reiterated his concerns for the proposed plat based upon his observations of the development of the Jyland- Whitney Addition. No further comment or objection was heard. Member Paulus made a motion for adoption of the following resolution, subject to: 1) Subdivision dedication fee of $24,000.00 and 2) Execution and recording of the Development Agreement as presented: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PETER ANDREA ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "PETER ANDREA ADDITION ", platted by (names to be inserted) and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council February 3, 1992, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *HEARING DATE OF 2/18/92 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice setting February 18, 1992, as hearing date for the following Planning matters:. 1) Rezoning and Lot Division - Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition 2) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls.23rd Addition Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING ON ALLEY VACATION BETWEEN 5411 ZENITH AV AND 5408 YORK AV CONTINUED INDEFINITELY As requested by ,the petitioner, motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice to continue indefinitely the public hearing on the request for alley vacation between 5411 Zenith Avenue and 5408 York Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. SECOND READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO 142 -A2 (TO INCREASE AMOUNT OF CONTINUING BOND ) Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 142 -A2 for Second Reading and moved adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142 TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTINUING BOND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Bonds. Unless exempt by state law, every applicant.for (i) a license registration for the carrying on within the City of the business of plumbing, water softener installing, well drilling or building moving, or (ii) a license pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 429, Part 1 (Oil Burner Installer), 429, Part 2 (Stoker Installer), 429, Part 3 (Steam and Hot Water Heating Installer), 429, Part 4 (Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning Installer), 429, Part 5 (Refrigeration Installer), 431, Part 4 (Gas Fitter) and 1302 (Scavenger) shall file with such application a bond that is valid and in force and effect in the penal sum of at least $5,000.00, with a corporate surety approved by the City Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all material and equipment furnished, and as to all business carried on or all work done, commenced or performed during the term of the license, license registration or renewal thereof shall:" Seca 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon passage and publication. ATTEST: City Clerk Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. Mayor *BID AWARDED FOR FAIRWAY AERATOR Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one fairway aerator to sole bidder, Cushman Motor Company, Inc., at $17,368.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 16 FOOT TRACTOR ROTARY MOWER Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a 16 foot tractor rotary mower to sole bidder, NTI Distributing Co., at $48',203.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GOLF COURSE SAND RAKE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for golf course sand rake to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Company at $6,469.00 with trade -in. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR USED HYDRAULIC ARTICULATED GRADER Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a used hydraulic articulated motor grader to recommended lowest true bidder, Midwest Machinery, at $76,400.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC PAINT Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for traffic paint (200 gallons white and 770 gallons yellow) to recommended low bidder, Linear Dynamics, Inc. at $6,332.70. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *AWARD OF BID ON SEWER JET CONTINUED TO 02/18/92 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to continue award of bid for a sewer jet to February 18, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Member Kelly left the meeting temporarily at 10:16 P.M. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO TAX FORFEITED LAND (PIN 06- 116 -21 -21 -0005) HENNEPIN COUNTY LIST 773 -NC) Planner Larsen explained that following the January 21, 1992 meeting, staff had sent a letter to 93 homeowners in the Viking Hills neighborhood and on Gleason Court as directed by the Council. The letter asked whether the neighbors had an interest in acquiring the tax forfeited land on Vernon Court (PIN 06- 116 -21 -21 -0005) paying off the special assessments levied against the property. Twenty -six residents (288) responded. None of the property owners who returned the survey had an interest in acquiring the property. Member Smith introduced the following Resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received on December 13, 1991, Non- Conservation List 773 -NC: and WHEREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PINS No. 06- 116 -21 -21 -0005 has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council, acting pursuant,to Minnesota Statute 282, that the said classification by the Board of County Commissioners for said parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of said parcel of land by public auction be and the same is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by said City Council that it hereby certifies that no new special assessments have been levied or are pending since the forfeiture. ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1992. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Kelly re- entered the meeting at 10:28 P.M. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES Mayor Richards presented a list of recommended appointments to advisory boards and commissions for terms expiring on February 1, 1992. Member Rice made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of individuals to advisory boards /commissions /committees as follows:. Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1/95) Arthur Dickey, Susan Kelm, Delores Paul Board of Appeals and Adiustments (3 year term to 2/1/95) Donald Patton Building Construction Appeals Board (3 year term to 2/l/95) Quentin Collins, Eugene Palmer Community Development and Planning Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95) David Byron, Robert Hale, Gordon Johnson Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/94) David Rosenblatt, Sally Tang Edina Park Board (3 year term to 2/1/95) James Fee, Andrew Herring, William Lord Edina Recycling Commission (2 year term to 2/1/94) William Brauer, Jr., Ardythe Buerosse, Robert Reid Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/94) Marilyn Curtis, Garold Nyberg Human Relations Commission (3 year term to 2/1/95) Nancy Atchison (S), John Crist (C), Phyllis Kohler (S) (School Board reappointment approved of Atchison, Kohler) Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice appointing Lowell McCarthy as the Assistant Weed Inspector for 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED CHANGING LOCATION OF POLLING PLACES IN PRECINCT NO. 16 AND 13 Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that the polling place for Precinct No. 16 be changed to Cornelia School, 7000 Cornelia Drive; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the polling place for Precinct No. 13 be changed to Centennial Lakes Park Centrum, 7499 France Avenue South. Member Rice seconded the motion. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CONDUCT,AT ARNOLD'S HOT RO%K MUSIC CAFE REPORTED A Bloomington resident, identified only as Mary, told the Council that she is the parent of two daughters ages 14.and 12. The older daughter has been attending dances at Arnold's Hot Roxx Music Cafe, 5125 Industrial Boulevard, over the past months when she was only 13. Mary said she had recently discovered that the age limit for admission was 15 years or older. She reported that she had gone to the parking lot to confront the owner about not carding her daughter for age. While outside she had witnessed boys getting beer out of a car trunk and girls smoking a joint at the front door. She said she will not allow her daughters to attend dances at Arnold's Hot Roxx because the owner is a profiteer and is only interested in making money. *CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 3, 1992, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $127,485.36; Communications $1,992.68; Art Center $15,414.38; Capital Fund $721.00; Swimming Pool Fund $129,573.89; Golf Course Fund $70,615.26; Recreation Center Fund $2,558.08; Gum Range Fund $21.94; Edinboroagh Park $22,313.16; Utility Fund $276,236.33; Storm Serer Utility $444.04; Liquor Dispensary Fund $47,790.09; TOTAL $695,166.21. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M. 6 City Clerk r t o ,, VI' o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: GORDON HUGHES From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Subject: AMENDMENT TO ANTENNA ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A3 AND REPEAL OF ANTENNA MORATORIUM ORDINANC NO. 114. Recommendation: Agenda Item # sue. A & B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Staff recommends adoption of attached ordinance. Staff also recommends that second reading be waived, that the moratorium be repealed (Ordinance No. 114 -A1), and that both the new ordinance and the repeal of the moratorium be effective on February 19, 1992. Info /Background: 6. The attached ordinance contains the language approved by the Council at their January 18, 1992 workshop. Since the attached ordinance is being considered ahead of the full recodified city code it must be adopted as an amendment to the existing Antenna Ordinance No. 812. The moratorium on permits for all types of antennas runs through March 4, 1992. If the Council adopts the ordinance as recommended by staff, the moratorium should be repealed. Staff recommends that they both be put into effect immediately. If the recommended ordinance is not adopted prior to March 4, 1992, staff would recommend an extension of the moratorium until such time as a new ordinance is in place. Attached to this report are copies of correspondence and comments we have received which address the proposed ordinance. Notwithstanding the comments, staff continues to recommend adoption of the ordinance as presented. i ORDINANCE NO. 114 -A1 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE MORATORIIIM ON ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR ERECTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF TOWERS, ANTENNAS, AND DISH ANTENNAS, AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 812 OF THE CITY OF EDINA Section 1. Ordinance No. 114 is hereby repealed. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on February 19, 1992. First Reading: February 18, 1992. Second Reading: Waived ATTEST: (signed) City Clerk (signed) Mayor City of Edina AL V Land Use & Platting Revised 2 -6 -92 Section 815 - Radio and Television Antennas and Towers 815.01 Definitions. Words and phrases used in this Section which are defined in Section 850 of this Code shall be construed in this Section according to their definitions contained in Section 850. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings in this Section: Antenna. Equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any building or structure. For purposes of this Section, "antenna" does not include "dish antenna ". Dish Antenna. A parabolic shaped antenna (including all supporting apparatus) which is used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any building or structure. Tower. Any pole, spire or structure, or any combination, to which an antenna or dish antenna is, or could be attached, or which is designed for an. antenna 815-1 Land Use & Platting City of Edina or dish antenna to be attached, and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces. 815.02 Permit Required; Exemptions. No antenna, dish antenna or tower of any kind shall be erected, constructed or placed, or re- erected, re- constructed or replaced, anywhere within the City without first making an application for and obtaining a permit from the City. Provided, however, no permit shall be required for the following: A. Dish antennas not greater than 9 square feet in cross sectional area, which do not exceed 6 feet in height as measured from the base of the dish antenna to the highest point of the dish antenna. B. All other towers or antennas which do not exceed six feet in height as measured from the base of the antenna or tower to the highest point of the antenna or tower. C. Antennas, dish antennas and towers erected or constructed by the City for City purposes. 815.03 Application for Permit; Issuance; Fee. Application for a permit required by this Section shall be made to the Building Official in the same manner, and containing the same information, as for a building permit pursuant to Section 410 of this Code. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Such permit shall be 815 -2 City of Edina issued by the Building Official. v IF 7 Land Use & Platting 815.04 General Requirements. All antennas, dish antennas and towers, for which a permit is required shall comply with the following requirements: Subd. 1 Compliance with Applicable Provisions. All applicable provisions of Section 410 of this Code, including wind loading requirements set forth in the State Building Code. Subd. 2 Grounding. Antennas, dish antennas and towers shall be grounded for protection against a direct strike by lightning and shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connections, with all applicable provisions of this Code and State Law. Subd. 3 Proximity to Power Lines. No antenna, dish antenna or tower shall exceed a height equal to the distance from the base of the antenna, dish antenna or tower to the nearest overhead electrical power line (except individual service drops), less five feet. Subd. 4 Protection from Climbing. Antennas, dish antennas or towers shall be protected to discourage climbing by unauthorized persons. 815.3 Land Use & Platting DRAM City of Edina Subd. 5 Restrictions on Attachments. No antenna, dish antenna or tower shall have affixed to it in any way lights, reflectors, flashers or other illuminating devices, or any signs, banners or placards of any kind, except one sign not over 10 square inches may be affixed indicating the name of the manufacturer or installer. Subd. 6 Prohibited. Attachments. No tower shall have constructed on it, or attached to it, in any way, any platform, catwalk, crow's nest or similar structure. Subd. 7 Construction Material Restrictions. All towers shall be constructed of corrosive- resistant steel or other corrosive- resistant, non - combustible materials. Towers shall not be constructed or made of wood, including timbers or logs. Subd. 8 Prohibited Extensions. No part of any antenna, dish antenna or tower nor any lines, cables, equipment, wires or braces used in connection with any tower or antenna shall, at any time, extend across or over any part of a street, sidewalk or alley. 815.05 Location. 815-4 DR City of Edina z -.. _ Land Use & Platting Subd. 1 Setback Location Prohibited. No part of any tower, dish antenna or antenna shall be constructed, located or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within any setback required by Section 850 of this Code for a principal building or structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna, dish antenna or tower is located. Subd. 2 Additional Restrictions for Towers and Antennas in Excess of 50 Feet in Height. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, the following minimum distance shall be provided between i) ground mounted towers, ii) ground mounted antennas, or iii) ground mounted towers with antennas, which are in excess of 50 feet in overall height, and the nearest lot line of a lot in the R -1 or R -2 District used for residential purposes: Minimum Distance in Feet = 20(h -50) + 50 h = overall height of tower and antenna in feet 815 -5 Land Use & Platting City of Edina Subd. 3 Additional Restrictions for R -1 and R -2 Districts. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 and Subd. 2 of this Subsection, the following requirements apply to lots in the R -1 and R -2 Districts as established by Section 850 of this Code other than lots in the R -1 District developed with a conditional use: A. Dish antennas. i) Dish antennas greater than 9 square feet in cross section area shall not be located on the roof or exterior wall of a principal or accessory building. ii). Dish antennas shall only be located in rear yards. B. All antennas and towers including dish antennas. i) No antennas, dish antennas or towers shall be located in the front yard. ii). No antenna, dish antenna or tower, shall be constructed, located or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, 815-6 City of Edina �' Fdm Land Use & Platting closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which it is located. 815.06 Height Restrictions. Subd. 1 R -1 and R -2 Districts. In the R -1 and R -2 District except lots in the R -1 District developed with Conditional Uses as established by Section 850 of this Code: A. No ground mounted antenna, ground mounted tower or ground mounted tower with an antenna shall exceed 50 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the tower or antenna, whichever is lower, to the highest point of the antenna or tower, whichever is higher. B. Towers and antennas mounted on or attached to a building or structure shall not extend higher than 15 feet above the highest point of the roof of the building or structure. C. Dish antennas shall not be in excess of 12 feet in height, measured 815-7 Land Use & Platting ®AFT City of Edina from the ground elevation at the base of the dish antenna to the highest point of the dish antenna. Subd. 2 Zoning Districts Other Than R -1 and R -2 and Conditional Uses Allowed in the R -1 District. In all other Zoning District as established by Section 850 of this Code and on lots in the R -1 District developed with Conditional Uses: A. No ground mounted antenna, ground mounted tower or ground mounted tower with an antenna shall exceed 75 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the tower or antenna, to the highest point of the antenna or tower, whichever is higher. B. Roof mounted antennas and towers shall have a height of no more than 18 feet as measured from the point at which the antenna is attached to the roof to the top of the highest portion of the antenna. C. Dish antennas shall have an overall height of no more than 18 feet for either a ground mount or roof mount, as measured from the point at which the antenna is mounted to the roof or the ground elevation to the highest point of the antenna. 815-8 City of Edina LJKAFT Land Use & Platting 815.07 Existing Antennas and Towers. Existing antennas, dish antennas and towers which do not conform to or comply with this Section are subject to the following provisions: Subd. 1 Use and Replacement. Existing antennas, dish antennas and towers may continue to be used for the purposes now used and as now existing, except as provided in Subd. 2 of this Subsection, but may not be replaced, expanded, enlarged or added to in any way without complying in all respects with this Section, except that antennas may be replaced, without so complying, provided the new antenna or dish antenna fully comply with the provisions of this Section. Subd. 2 Destroyed or Damaged Antennas, Dish Antennas or Towers. If an antenna, dish antenna or tower is damaged or destroyed due to any reason or cause whatsoever, the same may be repaired and restored to its former use, location and physical dimensions upon obtaining a building permit but without otherwise complying with this Section. Provided, however, that if the cost of repairing or restoring such damaged or destroyed antenna, dish antenna or tower would be 50 percent or more, as estimated by the Building Official, of the cost of purchasing and erecting anew antenna, dish antenna or tower of like kind and quality and to the former use,. physical dimensions and location, then the antenna, dish antenna, or tower may not be repaired or restored except in full compliance with this Section. 815 -9 Mrt Land Use & Platting LjkxAFT City of Edina 815.08 Number of Antennas, Dish Antennas and Towers. Subd. 1 R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts. In the R -1 and R -2 Districts as established by Section 850 of this Code, no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Subsection 815.02, one dish antenna requiring a permit under the provisions of this Section, and one tower with antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any single lot. Subd. 2 Other Residential Districts. In districts zoned residential by Section 850 of this Code, other than R -1 and R -2 Districts, no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Subsection 815.02, one dish antenna requiring a permit under the provisions of this Section and one tower with antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract. 815.09 Variances. Variances from the literal provisions of this Section shall be processed and granted or denied in the same manner and based on the same criteria and conditions as variances under Section 850 of this Code. 815.10 Abandoned Antennas, Dish Antennas and Towers; Removal. Any antenna, dish antenna or tower which is not used for six successive months shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or substandard buildings established by Sections 470 of this 815-10 City of Edina w� Land Use & Platting Code. 815.11 Interpretation. It is not the intention of this Section to interfere with, abrogate or annul any covenant or other agreement between parties. Where this Section imposes a greater restriction upon the'use of premises for antennas, dish antennas or towers than are imposed or required by other Sections of this Code, rules, regulations or permits, or by covenants or agreements, the provisions of this Section shall govern. History: Ord 812 adopted 6- 10 -71; amended by Ord 812 AI 6- 17 -81, Ord 812-A2 6 -12 -85 815-11 LAW OFFICES Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Antenna and Tower Ordinance for City of Edina Dear Mr. Larsen: Pursuant to your request we reviewed the proposed Section 815 of the Edina City Code, regulating radio and television antennas and towers. We understand your request for review concerns only potential conflict with existing regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Accordingly, we have not made a detailed or in -depth review of Section 815. The proposed Section 815 regulates the the City of Edina. No antenna or tower obtaining a permit from the City, except in antennas are, in general, regulated as to standards relevant to safety factors. building of antennas and towers in may be constructed without first limited circumstances. Towers and location; height, and construction The FCC regulates the construction, marking a: antenna or tower structures under provisions of Regulations. A copy of the pertinent regulations consideration. These regulations become applicable to height of 200 feet above ground, or if a special required under the regulations of the FAA (Subpart D). ad lighting of certain the Code of Federal are enclosed for your structures of a minimum aeronautical study is The regulations of the FAA require notification to the FAA if an antenna or tower of a particular height is proposed for construction at a location within a certain distance of an airport runway. Again, we also enclose these regulations so you can review the relationship between height restriction and airport location. We note that Section 815.06 sets height restrictions well below the 200 -feet benchmark for the federal regulations. MOSS & BARNETT A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION HERMAN J. RATBLLE ROBERT J. LUKES 4800 NORWEST CENTER MITCHELL H. COX JENNIFER A. BROOKS PATRICK F. FLAHERTY J. MICHAEL HIRSCH MICHAEL J. BRADLEY MARLA BARRED TIPPING WAYNE A. VANDER VORT EDWARD J. BLOMMB 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET PETER A. KOLLER - ANN M. MEYER DONALD B. WIKSB MARGO S. STRUTHERS STEVEN Z. KAPLAN VINCENT J. PAHNLANDER HOWARD S. COX ANN K. NEWHALL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -4119 NICK HAY NANCY M. KISKIS PAUL VAN VALKENBURG MICHAEL J. AHERN JEANNE K. STRETCH HEIDI A. SCHNEIDER MICHAEL L. FLANAGAN MAHER J. WEINSTEIN TELEPHONE (612 ) 347 -0300 RICHARD J. KELBER CHARLES B. JONES W. SCOTT HERZOG PHILLIP GAINSLEY REESE B. CHEZICK ROSS A. KAPLAN WAYNE A. HERGOTT JEFFREY L. WATSON TELECOPIER (612 ) 339-6686 - LAURA J. MCKNIGHT BRIAN T. GROGAN JAMES B. O'BRIBN ROBERT B. FE RING BARBARA JEAN D'AQUILA CORY LARSEN BETTENGA JOHN F. STONE THOMAS J. SHROYER ELIZABETH A. SNELSON PAUL G. NBIMANN DALE M. WAGNER SUSAN C. RHODE EDWARD L. WINER BARBARA G. STUART M. CECILIA RAY ADRIAN E. HERBST DAVID P. JENDRZBJEK THOMAS M. HUGHES RETIRED WILLIAM N. KOSTER DANIEL J. GOLDBERG PAUL T. EI DSNESS J. BRAINERD CLARKSON WILLIAM A. HAUG CURTIS D. SMITH DANIEL R. SUNDELL FREMONT C. FLETCHER CHARLES A. PARSONS, JR. DAVE F. SENGER MAUREEN A. SCOTT VERNE W. MOSS PHILIP A. PFAFFLY BRUCE E. MARTIN WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER JOSEPH R. KLEIN JAMBS H. HENNESSY RICHARD J. JOHNSON __ LOUIS J. SPELTZ /�/� - February 10,_ 1 9 9 2 DAVID M. HENRY STANLEY R. STASBL Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Antenna and Tower Ordinance for City of Edina Dear Mr. Larsen: Pursuant to your request we reviewed the proposed Section 815 of the Edina City Code, regulating radio and television antennas and towers. We understand your request for review concerns only potential conflict with existing regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Accordingly, we have not made a detailed or in -depth review of Section 815. The proposed Section 815 regulates the the City of Edina. No antenna or tower obtaining a permit from the City, except in antennas are, in general, regulated as to standards relevant to safety factors. building of antennas and towers in may be constructed without first limited circumstances. Towers and location; height, and construction The FCC regulates the construction, marking a: antenna or tower structures under provisions of Regulations. A copy of the pertinent regulations consideration. These regulations become applicable to height of 200 feet above ground, or if a special required under the regulations of the FAA (Subpart D). ad lighting of certain the Code of Federal are enclosed for your structures of a minimum aeronautical study is The regulations of the FAA require notification to the FAA if an antenna or tower of a particular height is proposed for construction at a location within a certain distance of an airport runway. Again, we also enclose these regulations so you can review the relationship between height restriction and airport location. We note that Section 815.06 sets height restrictions well below the 200 -feet benchmark for the federal regulations. MOSS & BARNETT A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Craig Larsen Page 2 February 10, 1992 With these regulations in mind, we reviewed the proposed Section 815, and have the following comments: 1. Section 815.02, subdivision 1A: It is not clear whether the height of exempt structures is measured from the ground, or if the measurement applies from the base of the structure. 2. Section 815.04, subdivision 5: This subdivision prohibits the attachment of any lights, reflectors, flashers, or other illuminating devices. Subpart C (Sections 17.21- 17.58) of the FCC regulations requires painting and lighting of towers and antennas which exceed 200 feet in height above ground, or require special aeronautical study. Again, we do note the proposed height restrictions under the City's regulations essentially limit antennas and towers to a height not to exceed 75 feet, as measured from ground elevation, or 18 feet (measured from the base of the antenna) when attached to a roof. However, it is possible for the City to grant a permit for the construction of a tower or antenna which must be lit according to FCC regulation. The City's prohibition on lighting conflicts with these regulations. 3. Section 815.05, subdivision 2B: It is not clear whether dish antennas nine square inches or smaller in cross section may be located on the roof or exterior wall of a principal or accessory building. Subdivision 2A prohibits placement of dish antennas of a greater size in these locations (implying the smaller dishes may be located there), and Subdivision 2A requires placement of all dish antennas in rear yards. 4. Section 815.06: FAA and FCC regulations may prohibit construction of towers and antennas at heights even lower than those set by the City of Edina. While the City essentially prohibits towers and antennas over 75 feet in height, you must also consider the proximity of airports to the structures. You may wish to require in the proposed Code section, as a prerequisite to the _grant of a permit, that the applicant demonstrate compliance with or non - applicability of FAA and FCC antenna and tower construction regulations. 5. Section 815.08: We note in subdivisions 1 and 2 the use of the conjunctive "and ", rather than "or ". The FCC and FAA regulations will not preempt the City's proposed Section 815, except where they are in direct conflict. As we noted, conflict is possible because of the City's prohibition on tower and antenna lighting, and in the event the City would grant a permit for a structure which is too high under the federal regulation standards. In both cases, the 200 -foot benchmark under federal regulations would indicate conflict is unlikely, but you must also consider airport proximity. MOSS & BARNETT A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Craig Larsen Page 3 February 10, 1992 Once you have had an opportunity to review this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I expect to be out of the office through Thursday, February 13. In my absence, please feel free to contact my associate, Cecilia Ray (347- 0289), also is familiar with this matter. Sincerely, MOSS & BARNETT A Professional Association Adrian E. Herbst MCR /stl 907ZKMG Enclosure C-e4�- /�- C -2--3 J r R4M ymarac3lo Am s 5716 Benton AvenW Edina, Minnesota 55436 February 10, 1992 The Honorable Mayor Frederick Richards Respected Council Members: Peggy Kelly Jane L. Paulus Bernard Rice, Jr. Glenn Smith City. of Edina c/o Craig Larsen, City Planner Edina City Hall .4801 West 50th Street' Edina,.Minnesote 55424 -1394 Re': Ordinance Section 815 - Radio and Television Antennas and Towers Draft Revision of 2 -6 -92 I am writing to provide comment for your consideration as you deliberate passage of the proposed Ordinance Section 815. Unfortunately, I have a previous commitment the evening of your February 18, 1992 and may not be able to attend. Therefore, I would ask that you extend the courtesy of including these comments in the record of public comment on the proposed ordinance. I have been an Edina resident for eleven years. I am an audiovisual, audio, video and teleconference facility design consultant. My background includes formal education in electronics and operation of broadcast radio and television :stations. This past fall I became an F.C.C. licensed amateur radio operator and currently hold a General Class license. Before offering specific comments on individual sections of the draft ordinance, I would like to offer the following generalities for your background information: 1. Antennas are ugly unless you own the antenna. 2. One more antenna is needed than someone thinks you need. 3. Most of us own more antennas than we think we-own. 4. Longer (larger) antennas are better than smaller (shorter) ones, all other things being equal. 5. Higher antenna supports (towers /poles) are better than shorter ones and result in less TV interferencel' . (Related: The "critical" minimum height for effective use of a radio technology is higher than everyone thinks is needed, and proving it requires expensive engineering.) 1 Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10,'1992 6. The thickness of the trees and the height of the house is directly proportional to their position to the south of a backyard satellite (dish) antenna. 7. The least costly antenna systems are more likely to require a variance than expensive ones. 8. Antenna sizes, positions, mounting and height are subject to the unchanging rules of physics. 9. Radio frequency based communication (including radio,• television and data) communication cannot take place without a transmitting antenna and a receiving antenna.: 10. Amateur radio operators have a long history of public service - on a day -to -day basis and in emergencies and key goals set out by the F.C.C. for the .service are fostering of international goodwill, development of the technology and training of a pool of skilled operators. 11. Changing technology will result in the need for more antennas rather than fewer antennas. 12. Amateur radio is a rewarding hobby that teaches courtesy, respect and acceptance of others and the vast majority of amateur radio operators are active, upstanding citizens. 13. Amateur radio today is diverse: from international "short wave" to localized emergency networks, to television and digital data transmissions. Therefore, each amateur station's antenna requirements are different.. There is no age requirement and no age limit. Amateurs (hams) are one of the few classes of radio equipment operators who must pass tests on law, procedure and technology to become licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. * * * * Most of the following specific comments relate to the draft ordinance's potential impact on amateur radio, but some will apply equally to broadcast radio and television reception - whether domestic, international and whether via traditional technologies or newer ones such as via space satellites. I am not well versed on the needs of commercial systems so will not comment directly on that., Section 815.02 A & B: Height restriction of 6 feet for "exempt" antennas. Recommendation: Height should be measured from the highest point of the structure to which it is attached. 2 Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10, 1992 Rationale: Clearance of the structure is usually critical to adequate performance of the antenna. Recommendation: 11 feet instead of six feet. Rationale: Antenna masts are manufactured in 5 and 10 foot lengths. In many places in Edina, to install a TV antenna to receive all UHF and VHF TV stations serving the area effectively requires a two -part antenna and in many situations, these cannot be installed on a five foot long mast after deduction for the mast mount. Similar height is required to clear trees for so- called "wireless cable" (microwave) television systems. Section 815.02 C: Exemption of requirements for antennas and towers erected by the City. Recommendation: Apply same criteria to the City as to its citizens and commercial residents. Rationale: Whatever functional, safety and /or aesthetic requirements are important enough to apply to the City's citizens and restrict them from pursuing their hobbies, interests and business enterprises should apply to the citizens as a group, i.e. the City. For example, one would not waive building safety code requirements dust because the building was built by the City. Section 815.04 Subd 3: Proximity to Power Lines Recommendation: except those antennas or towers which shall have been designed such that in the event of collapse or failure they shall fall clear of the adjacent power lines. Rationale: This will allow installation, for example, of a ground mounted dish antenna near (and well below and clear of) a power line and installation of towers which have been designed to collapse within themselves or within a predictable area. Section 815.04 Subd. 5: Restrictions on Attachments Recommendation: Allow placement of safety warning signs not to exceed 180 square inches. Rationale: Safety. Section 815.04 Subd 7: Construction Material Restrictions Recommendation: All towers shall be constructed of corrosive resistant steel or other corrosive resistant materials. Rationale: In many cases non - metallic antenna supporting members are required for proper operation of the antenna, e.g. fiberglass, polycerbonates, carbon -fiber materials, composites, wood, etc. Utility poles of wood have served effectively for many years. Some of these materials, fiberglass composites for 3 Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10, 1992 example, are used as lamp posts. Non - metallic materials can be more easily blended with the aesthetic environment. Section 815.05 Subd. 1: Setback location Recommendation: No part of any tower, dish antenna or antenna shall be constructed, located or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within five feet of a lot line or the setback required by Section 850 of this Code for a principal building or structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna, dish antenna or tower is located, whichever is closer to the lot line. Rationale: Five feet allows ample space .for antenna construction and maintenance. The proposed language . is inordinately restrictive technically and aesthetically. Many simple, inexpensive, unobtrusive antennas, e.g. simple wire antennas, are physically long and require supports at the ends and could not be located within the standard setbacks of average residential lots. Whereas expensive, and much more visible towers with large top mounted antennas could be easily constructed within the setback. For ground mounted satellite dish antennas which must have a clear view of the southern sky (because that's where the satellites are)over the equator) have to be located as far to the north as possible in the backyard of a house on the north side of the street. In other cases, a back corner of.,a lot, hidden from view, would work well for a ground mounted vertical antenna (post). Section 815.05 Subd. 2: Additional Restrictions on Antennas in excess of 50 feet in Height Comment: I am not sure I understand the intent of this section. For example, a tower and antenna 51 feet tall would have to be located 70 feet from the lot line and a tower and antenna 60 feet tall would have to be located 250 feet from the lot line! Section 815.05 Subd. 3, Part A ii: Additional Restrictions for R- 1 and R -2 districts. Recommendation: Dish antennas larger than 9 square feet shall only be located in rear and side yards. Rationale: Clarify that small dish antennas for satellite and microwave purposes can be mounted on the house. Satellite antennas of whatever design, dish or otherwise, must have a clear view of the satellite to function and most satellites of interest,are located above the equator. 4 Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10, 1992 Therefore, since Section A i prohibits larger satellite antennas from the roof or exterior wall, many people with houses on the north side of an east -west street would be unable to use satellite services if they couldn't mount their antennas in the aide yards. Section 815.05 Sub. 3 B ii. Recommendation: Delete entirely. Rationale: See earlier comments on locating near lot lines. My intuitive feeling is that if people really tried to adhere to this, there would be many requests for variances, adding unnecessary expense and complexity and unduly burdening the City Staff. Section 815.06 Subd. 1 A: R -1 & R -2 Height Restrictions Recommendation: No ground mounted antenna, ground mounted tower or ground mounted tower with an antenna shall exceed 60 feet in height . . . Rationale: This ordinance but still effective functioning and adds some flexibi feet is considered antennas. is more restrictive than the existing meets the basic technical criteria for for the majority of amateur radio antennas lity in the antenna /tower combination. Sixty minimum height for some high frequency The higher the antenna the less the potential for TV and other interference. Sixty feet fails in the middle ground of the communities' requirements: Minneapolis - 55 feet or 20 feet above the whichever is higher. Bloomington - unlimited as long as unsupported less than distance to the lot line. Richfield - 70 feet. Eden Prairie: - 65 feet. Hopkins - 52.5 ft. (1.5x hgt. allowed for bldg. 35 ft. x 1.5 = 52.5 ft.) St. Louis Park - 52.5 ft. (1.5x hgt. allowed for 35 ft. x 1.5 = 52.5 ft.) f¢► Section 815.06 Subd. 1 B: Height Restrictions surrounding structure height is i.e. bldg. i.e. Recommendation: shall not exceed 26 feet above the highest point of the building or structure or the height for a ground mounted antenna, tower, or tower with antenna (See Subd 1 A above) whichever is less. Rationale: In many cases, simpler, more aesthetically pleasing antennas can be mounted directly to ,a house rather than building a free standing and expensive tower to support them at Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10, 1992 an adequate height. (Copies of common examples are attached.) Also, it doesn't make sense to restrict tower /antenna height dust because the person added to its support by attaching it to the side of a house. Section 815.06 Subd 1 C: Height Restrictions Recommendation: . . . excess of 15 feet in height . . . Rationale: For beat performance for some applications, 3.5 meter (twelve feet approx.) diameter antenna is required. Allowing for mount height and snow clearance, a height of 15 feet would be appropriate. A height of 15 feet would also allow some 3 meter (10 feet approx.) diameter antennas to be mounted dust high enough to clear some obstructions. In either case, the additional height would help minimize vandalism and theft of antenna electronics. Section 815.08 Subd. 1: Number of antennas, Dish antennas, and Towers. Comment: Let me first state that I fully understand that the concern is to reduce the likelihood of an aesthetically offensive combination of multiple antennas. However, I think this is a situation not unlike the question of being a "little bit pregnant "!. For example, one tower could easily support a large antenna and multiple antennas at its top and along its side and wires strung from it as supports and additional antennae. It would be costly, and I'm sure from a lot of individuals perspectives, it would be UGLY, yet it would be legal. On the other hand, installation of a modest TV antenna and a couple of the thin, fiberglass antennas shown in the attachment with perhaps a modest, almost invisible side mounted small satellite data or direct broadcast satellite (DBS) antenna would not be permitted. NOTE: If you have gas service from Minnegasco and have signed up for the peak load air. conditioner control power conservation system from NSP, you already have two (2) "exempt" antennas on the outside of your house and are technically in violation of this section! Recommendation: In the R -1 and R -2 Districts . . . no more than four (4) exempt antennas as defined in Subsection 815.02 or combination of four (4) exempt and non - exempt antennas mounted to towers where the tower portion is no more than 11 feet in height and requiring a permit under the provisions of this section, one dish antenna requiring a permit under the provisions of .this Section, and one tower with antennas requiring a permit under this section shall be allowed at any one time on any single lot except that up to four poles no higher than 30 feet shall be allowed as support for wire antennas. 6 Edina - Antenna Regulations Raymond Voss February 10, 1992 Rationale: This will cover the multitude of exempt antennas which are rapidly becoming necessary to meet the changes in technology, such as radio based meter reading and radio based power load controls, as well arsatellite based data and broadcast digital audio and television services. It will also allow individuals to chose the most economical and aesthetically pleasing solution to their antenna requirements, rather than being forced to chose more expensive and more visible towers /antennas dust because they are the "permitted" ones. * * * * Remember - - dust because an individual has to install an antenna for their hobby or interests doesn't mean that they don't care about its appearance. I have yet to meet a "ham" who would not like to spend less money and have a more attractive antenna, if it would work! No viewer of satellite television wants to spend the money or install the large dish antenna, but until DES arrives in full, the large antennas are necessary! I would also note that only by allowing effective terrestrial (land) based and satellite based communications and entertainment transmit and receive antennas can we expect to have effective competition to the various wired communication systems. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I would be pleased to answer any questions you might have. ,e ii (-,. 7 ly, 4ySinc mond Voss X 700 21TV70cm 9.3dB(2m) 13.OdB(70cm) 20OW 50 ohms Less than 1.5:1 7.2m(23.6') approx.52cm(20.5 ") 3.8kg(8.4 lbs.) 40misec.(90MPH) :0.62o(1 1/5' to 2 2/5') than 45o(1.77')diameter past is recommended iF ' 5/8- wavelength C -Load phased-element(2m), n 5/8- wavelength C -Load lased- etement(70cm) X500H X -500M X -500 X400 2rtV70cm 2m170cm 2m/7Ocm 2ml7Ocm 8.3dB(2m) 11.7dB(70cm) 8.3dB(2m) 11.7dB(70cm) 8.3dB(2m) 11.7dB(70cm) 7.9dB(2m) 11.OdB(70cm) 200W 20OW 20OW 20OW Sum of both bands 50 ohms 50 ohms 50 ohms 50 ohms Less than 1.5:1 Less than 1.5:1 Less than 1.5:1 Less than 1.5:1 5.4m 17.T 5.2m(17.1') 5.2m(17.1') approx.4.6m(15.1') a rox.52cm 20.5' a rox.52cm 20.5' a rox.52cm (20.5 ") approx.52cm(20.5 ") 2.6kg(5.7 lbs.) 2.4kg(5.3 lbs.) 2.4kg(5.3 lbs.) 2.2kg(4.8 lbs.) 40m/sec.(90MPH) 4OnVSec.(90MPH) 40m/sec.(90MPH) 40m/sec.(90MPH) St 30 -62o(1 115' to 2215") 30 -62x(1 1/5" to 2 215 ") 30.62o(1 1/5" to 2 2/5') 30 -62x(1 1/5" to 2 2/5 ") 30 UHF UHF N UHF Three 5/8- wavelength C -Load phased- element(2m), Eight 518-wavelength C -Load phased- element(70cm) Three 5/8- wavelength C -Load phased- element(2m), Eight 5/8-wavelength C -Load phased- element(70cm) Three 5 /8- wavelength C -Load phased- element(2m), Eight 5/8-wavelength C -Load phased- element(70cm) Three 5/8- wavelength C -Load phased- element(2m), Seven 5/8- wavelength C -Load phased- element(70cm) Two 5/; Five I pr, COMETPRES77GE GPX- 2010 SUPER HIGH GAIN DUAL - BANDER The SLC System (Super Linear Converter) results in an extremely high gain, high performance antenna. 146MHz 9.5dB 446MHz 13.2dB -LPX -2010 The highest gain Dual -Band in the World. Sall A Wine: 146MHt 9.SdB 6/4 wave 15 446MI t 13.2dB s/e wave 112 3d ice: 50 ohms 1.5:1 or less Mu Payer: 200 wads deaptk 23' V Welgbt 1 Ibs.14 ots. Moadirl Mud Dim: 11/4-21/2' t000ector. UHF Flat radiation pattern provides exceptional long range communication. Stay Included Non -metal guys and nylon stays provide excellent signal generation and reception without creating-. interference. Also providing solid antenna support. Non - metallic joint ABS non - metallic joint system eliminates signal interference and provides the best radiation pattern. Heavy duty fiberglass construction. Aluminum Base Allows rigid mounting to a 1114 -211" mast S0239 connector. NCG Companies 1275 North Grove Street Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 630 -4541 FAX (714) 630 -7024 DUAL -BAND �I -illd _y A7Work the world with more effective radiated power. Whether you are dig breaking through the pileups, R7 has the performance you demand to I pleasure. This halfwave design which does not require ground radials is only 22 of radiation for DXing on 40 through 10 meters. R7's small footprint and ground i select any location from ground to tower top. R7 is ideal for hams living in apartr small city lots. Assembly and installation are quick with the easy -to- follow instructions. R7 changes bands automatically. The traps and broadband matching network are tuned and sealed at the factory; there are no moving parts or tuners and it has only 7 short counterpoise rods. The only connection needed is the 50 Ohm coax. Experience seven band perform- ance anywhere. Use the R7! Operation from even tighter locations is easy with the R5 - It's a full fT R faint chnrtar than thin R7 A rorlocinncri horn m ,nt r,o *,.,e. 4 counterpoise rods and improved traps make the R5 a hot performer on 10 through 20 meters. Thousands of R5's are in use by satisfied hams around the world. Read their comments below and you'll be convinced that this is the antenna for you. Frequency, MHz 28, 24, 21, 18,14 28, 24, 21, 18, 14.10, 7 Gain, dBi 3 3 Electrical Wavelength Half -wave Half -wave SWR 2:1 Bandwidth 10 m -2 MHz / 12 m -100 KHz 10 m -2 MHz / 12 m -100 KHz 15 m -450 KHz / 17 m 100 KHz 20 m -150 KHz / 30 m -25 KHz 40 m -75 KHz 1800 16 Automatic 360° 22.5 1.5 -1.75 778 -4.4) 2.25 (.21) 12.3 (5.6) 7 15 m -450 KHz / 17 m -200 KHz 20 m -350 KHz Power Rating, Watts PEP Radiation Angle, Degrees Frequency Selection Horizontal Rad. Pattern Deg. Height, ft (m) Mast Size Range, in (cm) Wind Load, ft' (m') Weight, lb (kg) 49" Counterpoise Radials Suppli 1800 16 Automatic 360' 17 (5.2 1.5 1.75 3.8 -4.4) 1.4 (.13) 8.7(4) ed 4 SWR 10 Meters (RS/R7) ``1111 ■_1111 ■_�'ll■ SWR Frequency MHz 12 Meters (1451117) IIII ■1111 ■1111 ■1111 ■illl ■1111 ■�IIII ■1111■ � �.��llll ■1111■ 24.8 SWR 24.85 249 24.95 25.0 Frequency MHz IS Meters (RS/R?) a�ra A�n SWR 17 Meters (R5 1R7) 8 6 14 11 i 1805 18.075 18.10 18.125 1815 Frequency MHz SWR 20 Meters (RS /R7) 1.8 I Frequency MHz ZMA 30 Meters (R7) LEE" 9 'OUR FELLOW HAMS ENDORSE THE R5 WITH WARRANTY CARD COMMENTS: 'DX stations sound like locals. Good SW listening antenna" (N7KEB) - "The best HF antenna I ever had." (HB9RLZ) - "Far out performs the G5RV" (N7HUS) • "All around good performer. Took 1 hour to put together and 1 hour to install" (KB2ELM) - "First QSO was a new country for DXCC" (KOBFT) - "Your antenna continues to amaze me. The DX on it is great." (WB6HKX) • "The pretuned elements made assembly a breeze" (VE3FGK) • "I amassed over 500 QSO's over about 20 hours of casual operating over a 10 day period. I'm impressed R5 performed so well installed at ground level using no radials." (W2VD /KP4) A 'Y I?�Ir To: From: THE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LE, GUE, INC. Administrative Headquarters 225 Main Street NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT, USA 06 11 Telephone: 203 -666 -1541 MCI Mail ID: 215 -5052 Tele : 203 - 665 -7531 I Fax Transmittal Sheet j La.r L1S Pages {including this cover s If there are any problems with this f please contact the originator or call 203 - 666 -1541. T # Sb9L Lz6 t- T£SLS99£0z WWVz :TT z6 -£T -20 ARRL nNu I /iNNu : As 1N3S Before the Federal Communications Comnlission >icc e Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Metter of rsemptton of state and 1 Federal p rtainln 1 local regulations Ps g } to Amateur radio facilities. PRB-1 Adopted: September 16, 1985 • Released-.Sept 19, 1985 By the Comm iss Ion: Commissioner Rivera not participating- ' aark4Ces"IId 1. On July 16, 1984, the American Radio Relay Lesgu , lnc. (ARRL) us f I led a Request for Issuance of nd otther local and state 9egu le-oy delineate the limitations of local mnSng a lficali the ARRL authority over Federally - licensed radio row9tlall local ordinances which wanted an explicit statement that wou Id pit Of re lab le Wateur radio provably preclude or significantly Snh tb it effective, commu n icat Ions. The ARRL acknowledges that lots i auth it lss can rthe fate amateur Installations to insure the safety cannot be;so'restrilctivs community, but believes that . that they preclude effective amateur conmunica +Ions. January 2 . 1 2. interested parties advised conments were due on or befold flbeforee 965 3. In the matter I • with extension, December 26, 1984 2. with reply comments due on re Over sixteen hundred cortments were filed- 1 2 3 Public Notice, August 30, 1984. Mimeo. No. 6299,., September 14, 1964. Public Notice, December '19. 1984, Mimeo No, 1498. Order, November 8, 19841 Mimeo. No. 770. 2 # Sb9L L26 FS£SLS99£0Z WCSE M 26 -£Z -20 F.R. 36113, nmu I /iNNu : Aa 1N3S 3. Conti Icts between amateur operators regarding radio antehne local authorities regarding restrictive ordinances are common• in part 97 Those rules {5 governed nolimit the height of an amateur antenna butotheyrl the regulations Those rules do no for aviation safety reasons, forr antennas which notification and 200 fee Fn�h procedures must be folio above ground level orantennas tntenna support be erected st�uctu es near equire obs under FCC rules some marking and lighting. On the other hand, local municipalities or g bodies frequently enact regulations t iml tc side or wrath yards,r for p structures in height and location, e.g. safety or aesthO the s effectiveness ofe the lco ,unlcations ithatcOR ti_- Coniderations. in conflict be from an amateur radio �lo directly dependent upon the yc a tennaAmateuroperatorsmaintainthattheOf The height of the precluded from operating in Is limited by a bands or their use dlnance height of their o 4. Examples of restrictive local ordinances ere submitted b amateur operators in this proceeding. Stanley J. California, noted that in San Diego amateur radio antennas•comeusn structures ruling which limits building heights to 30 Mundelein, there are also limited to 30 feet. Alexander Vrenlos, Mundelein, that wrote that at ordinance of thtoyerty elne the Mundelein equal to one any must be a distance from the property times its height. usinove� 93startenislighted to an antenna tower amateur static J . 5. John C. Chapman, an amateur living in Bloomington, Minnes, commented that he was exce dine 3S feet In height scausetthe Bic to obtain a building amateur radio antenna i3 0 35 feet. Mr. C city ordinance restricted "structures" heights ' (led a building that the ordinance, w hen w r Itten, undoubtedly app antennas In the absence of a specific ordina now being applied regulating them• There were He two could options equestnatovariance to the of in amateur communica way of a hearing before the City Council, or he could obtfonose� his all5flons swearing that aiternobtain obtaining the cc Instailatio 9 at ern his neighbors. e before hercould effectively engage in radio COMmu several po D for which he had a valid FCC amateur license. . s and amateur rules. -equ Ire, ipprova I S ight ;. Thus, tructlon overning port her lth . resu It -ion and ,e If the r several or a. antennas I I i Inols in antenna one -half for his ta, tall an NnIngton +apman said but was ice to engage dlnance by davits from antenna #perat ion of Isslon from +(cations £ ## S09L LZ6 F T iSLS99z0Z WCS£ : T T 26 -Z T -ZO n1 ju I /1NNu : A9 1N3S 0 t5. its addit[c� to he[cht restrictions, other limits are enacted by local jurlsdlctions-- anti -tilmb devices on towers or fences around them; minimum distances from high voltage power lines; minimum distances of towers from property Iinos; and regulations pertain I ng to the structural soundness of the antenna installation. By and large, atours do not find tnese safety precautions objectlnnable. what they do jest to are the sometimes prohibitive, non-refundable application fell g fees to obtain a permit to erect an antenna installation and those prov slons In ordinances which regulate antennas for purely aesthe=lc reasons. The amateurs contend, almost universally, that "beauty is In the eye of the �eholder.w They assert that an antenna installation Is not more aesthetically dtspleasing than other objects that peo)le keep on their property, e.g. motor hones, trailers, pick -up trucxs, solar collectors end garden) g equipment. 7. Amateur operators also oppose restrictions on their amateur operations which are contained In the deeds for their lomes or in their apartment leases. Since these restrictive covenants a s contractual agreements between private parties, they are not generally a matter of concern to the Commission. However, since some ama Burs who commented In this proceeding provided us with examples of restrictive covenants, they are included for Information. Mr. Eug no 0. Thomas of Hollister, California Included In his comments an extr ct of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for Ridgemar Estates, County of San Benito, State of California. It provides: No antenna for transmission or reception of radio signals shall be erected outdoors for use by any dwelling unit except upon approval of the Directors. No radio or television signals or any other form of electromagnetic radiation shall be perm) ed to originate from any lot which may unreasonably interfere with the reception of television r radio signals upon any other lot. Marshall Wilson, Jr. provided a copy of the restricts a covenant contained In-deeds for the Bell Martin Addition 02, Irving, Tex s. It Is binding upon all of the owners or purchasers of the lots in t s said addition, his or their heirs, executors, administrators or asst ns. It reads: No antenna or tower shall be erected upon a�y lot for the purposes of radio operations. William J. Hamilton resides In an apartment building in Gladstone, Missouri. He cites a clause In his lease prohibiting the erectl of an antenna. He V # Sb9L LEG FT£SLS99£0Z WC9£ : T T Z6 -£T -Z0 nNu I /iNNC : A9 1NaS 4 states that he has been forced to give up operating amateur radio equipment except a hand -held 2 meter (144 -148 MHz) radio transcelver. He maintains that he should not be penalized Just because he lives in an apartment. Other restrictive covenants are less global In scope than those cited above. For example, Robert Webb purchased a home In Houston, Texas. Is deed restriction prohibited "transmitting or receiving antennas ext riding above the roof line." 8. Amateur operators generally oppose restrictive covens is for several reasons. They maintain that such restrictions limit t e places that they can reside if they want to pursue their hobby of. amateur radlo. Some state that they impinge on First Amendment rights of free speech. Others believe that a constitutional right Is being abridged because, in their view, everyone has a right to access the airwaves regardless of where they live. 9. The contrary belief held by housing subdivislon commu sties and condominlmum or homeowner's associations Is that amateur radio installatlons constitute safety hazards, cause Interference to other electro Ic equipment which may be operated in the home (televisions, radio, stereos or are eyesores thet,detract from the.aesthetic and tasteful appearan a of the housing development or apartment complex. To counteract these negative consequences, the subdivisions and associations Include in their deeds, leases or by -laws restrictions and limitations on the location and height of antennas or, in some cases, prohibit them altogether. The estrlctive covenants are contained In the contractual agreement entered Into at the time of the sale or lease of the property. Purchasers or lossless are free to choose whether they wish to reside where such restrictions on amateur antennas are In effect or settlL. elsewhere. Sue0 mot 11 ag Comments 10. The Department of Defense (DOD) supported the ARRL a d emphasized In Its comments that continued success of existing national s curity and emergency preparedness teiecommunicatlons plans involving ama eur stations would be severely diminished if state and local ordinances we a allowed to prohibit the construction and usage of effective amateur trap mission facilities. DOD utilizes volunteers In -he Military Affiliate Radio Service (MARS)4. Civil Air Patrol (CAP) and the Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES). It points out that these volunteer communicators are operating radio equipment instaIIad in their. homes and that undue restr ctions on 4 MARS is solely under the auspices of the military which recruits volunteer amateur operators to render assistance to It. The ommisslon Is not Involved in the MARS program. S # SV96 GZ6 F T ESLS99E0Z WC9E : T T Z6 -E T -ZO nNu I /" INNu : Aa 1N3S antennas by local authorities alversely affect their efforts.' DOD states that the responsiveness of these volunteer systems would be I�palred if local ordinances Interfere with the effectiveness of these ImPortant pnational telecommunication resources. DOD favors the issuance of a ruling that would sat ilmits for local and state regulatory bodies when they are dealing with amateur stations. 11. Various chapters of the American Red Cross also cooq forwerd to support the ARRL 's request for a preemptive ruling. The' Red Cross works closely with amateur radio volunteers. It believes that witliout amateurs' dedicated support, disaster relief operations would signific ntly suffer and that Its ability to,serve disaster victims would be hampered It feels that antenna height limitations that might be imposed by local boles will negatively affect the service nor rendered by the volunteers1 12. Cities and counties from various parts of the United States filed comments In support of the ARRL's request for a Federal preemption ruling. The comments from the Director of Civil Defense, Port Arthur Texas are representative: Tl-; Amateur Radio Service plays a vital role with our Civil Defense program here In Port Arthur and the design of these antennas and towers I-ends greatly to our ability to communicate during time of disaster. We do not believe there should be any restriction! on the antennas and towers except for reasonable safety precautions. Tropical storms, hurricanes and tornadoes are a way of life here on the Texas Gulf Coast and good communications are absolutely essential when preparing for a hurricane and even more so during recovery operations after the hurricane has past. 13. The Quarter Century Wireless Association took a trong stand In favor . of the Issuance of a declaratory ruling. It bell ves that Federal preemption is necessary so that there w11I be uniformity for all Amateur radio installations on private. property throughout the Unfled States. 14. In Its comments, the ARRL argued that the Commission has the jurisdiction to preempt certain local land use regulations which frustrate or prohl.bit amateur radio communications. It said that the appropriate standard In preemption cases is not the extentlof state and local interest in a given regulation, but rather the impaclf of that regulation on Federal goals. Its position is that rederallpreemption Is warranted whenever local governmental regulations relate adversely to the operational aspects of amateur communication. The ARRL mllntalns that 9 ## Sb9L Lz6 F T £SLS99£0z WULE : T T Z6 T -z0 nNu I /-im8u : AH 1N3S W localities routinely-employ a variety of land use devices to pre lude.the Installation of effective amateur antennas, Including height res rictlons, conditional use permits, building setbacks and dimensional limitations on antennas. It sees a declaratory ruling of federal preemption as necessary to cause municlpalitles tc accommodate amateur operator needs in lend use planning efforts. 15. James C. Of Connell, an attorney who has represented se oral amateurs before local zoning authorities, said that requiring am tours to seek variances or special use approval to erect reasonable anten as unduly restricts the operation of amateur stations. He suggested that e Commission preempt zoning ordinances which impose antenna height limits of less than 65 feet. He sai: that this height would represent a r asonable accommodation of the commu-lcetlon needs of most amateurs and th legltlm %te concerns of local zoning authorities. 16. The City of La Mesa, California controls amateur antennas. Its comments a balanced view. has a zoning regulatlo� which reflected an attempt to reach This regulation has neither the intent, nor the effect, of precluding or Inhibiting effective and reliable communications. Such antennas may be built as long as their construction does not -unreasonably block`vlews or constitute eyesores. The reasonable assumption Is that there are always alternatives at a given site for different placement, and /or methods for ae:thetic treatment. Thus, both public objectives of controlling land use for the public health, safety, and convenience, and providing an effective communications network, can be satisfied. A blanket rulln; to completely set as local control, or a rvll,ng which -ecognizes control only for the purpose of safety or antenna construction, would be contrary to ... legitimate local control. 17. Comments from the County of San Diego state: While we are aware of the benefits provided by amateur operators, we oppose the Issuance of a preemption ruling which would elevate 'antenna effectiveness' to a position above all other considerations. We must, however, argue that the L # Sb9L LZ6 f T£SLS99£0Z WUGE : T T Z6-£T -Z0 n1 iu I /iNNC : AR 1N3S - IocaI government must have the ability tr;,la e reasonable limitations upon the placement and configuration of amateur radio transmitting a d receiving antennas. Such ability Is necessar to assure that the local declslon- makers have th authority to protect the public health, safet and welfere of all citizens. In concluslon, I would like to emphasize an important difference between your regulatory powers and that of focal governments. Your Commission's approval of the preemptive requests would establish a 'national policy'. However, any regulation adopted by a local Jurisdiction co Id be overturned by your Commission or a court I such regulation was determined to be unreasonable. le. The City of Anderson, Indiana, summarized that face local communities: i am sympathetic to the concerns of these ante owners and I understand that to gain the maxim recepti-on from their devices, optimal locatlor necessary. However, the preservation of residential zoning districts as 'llveablet neighborhoods Is Jeopardized by placing these antennas In front yards of homes. Major probl Of public safety have been encountered, particularly vision blockage for auto and pedestrian access. In addition, all communist are faced with various bullding lot sizes. Ma building lots are so small that established setback requirements (in order to preserve ade air and light) are vulnerable to the unregulat placement of these antennas. ..the exercise of preemptive authority by the FCC in granting this request would not be in t best interest of the general public. 19. The National Association of Counties.(NACO), t Planning Association (APA) and the National league of Cl opposed the issuance of an antenna preemption ruling. N federal and state power must be viewed In harmony and we Intrusion Into local concerns of health, safety and welt the tradltlonal police power exercised by the state and with the legitimate activities of the states. NLC belle, of the problems na Is uate d e American les (NLC) all 00 emphasized that ns that Federal re could weaken nduly Interfere ad that both e ## Sb9L L26 e-T£SLS99£02 WC9Z : T T 26 -ET -20 nisi I /-INNu : AH 1N3S 8 Federal and local interests can be accommodated without preemptl'ng local authority to regulate the installation of amateur radio antenna . The APA said that the FCC should continue to leave the issue of regulat,ng amateur antennas With the iocal government and with the state and Feder I courts. llicr�le� 20. When considering preemption, we must begin with two constitutional provisions. The tenth amendment provides that a y powers which the constitution elther does not delegate to the United States or does not prohibit the states from exercising are reserved to th states. These are the police powers of the states. The Supremacy Clause, however, provides that the constitution and the laws of the United States shall supersede any state law to the contrary. -Article III, Section '2. Given these basic premises, state laws may be preempted in three way c First, Congress may expressly preempt the state law. See �2., 43C U.S. 519, 525.(1977). Or, Congress may Indicate its Intent to completely occupy a given field so that any state law encompas ed within that field would impllcity be preempted. Such Intent to preen t could be found in a conSressionai regulatory scheme that was so pervasl a that It would be reasonable to assume that Congress did not Intend o permit 71d&il+y Federal SAY = the states to supplement it. See v e Ia Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141, 153 (1982). Finally, preemptio may be warranted when state law conflicts with federal law. Such con IlctI may occur when "compliance with both Federal and state regulat ons is a physical impossibillty," Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 142, 143 (1963), or when state laK "stands es an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and o Jectives of Congress," Nines v. DavidDwltz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941). Fu thermore, federal regulations have the same preemptive effect as federau statutes. Fldellt_ IntiOn—va—de , 21. The situation before us requires manle y conflict withfede ral to which state and local zoning regulations Y policies concerning amateur radio operators. i 22. Few matters coming before us present such a clear dichotomy of viewpoint as does the instant issue. The cities, countles� local communities and housing associations see an obligation to ali'of their clilzens and try to address their concerns. This is accomplished through regulations, ordinances or covenants oriented toward he health, safety and general welfare of those they regulate. At the opj,osIt9 pole are the individual amateur operators and their support g oups who are troubled by local regulations which may inhibit the use of amateur stations or, in some instances, totally preclude amateur commonicatlons. Aligned with the operators are such entitles as the Depar1menj of Defense, the American Red Cross and local civil defense and emergency Organizations who have found in Ameteur Radio a pool of skilled radio opera ors and a 6 1# Sb9L LZ6 FT£SLS99£0Z WC6£ : T T Z6 -£T7ZO nNu I /iNNC : Aa 1N3S 9 1VIG Sir�l, - d E:A, e believe it is rest in promoting I governments which we will on may be mace readily available backup network. In this situation, appropriate to stike a balance between the federal int amateur operations and the legitimate Interests of loo in regulating local zoning matters. The cornerstone o predicate our decision Is that a reasonable accommodat tureen the two sides. . 23. Preemption is primarily a function of the ex, between federal and state and local regulation. Thus, whether our regulationE or policies can tolerate a sta, may consider such factc-s as the severity of the confl underlying the state's regulations. In this regard, w recognized the legitimate and Important state interest; zoning regulations. For example, In Earth Satellite 0 95 FCC 2d 1223 (1983), we recognized that pent of the conflict in considering he regulation, we ict and the reasons i have previously reflected In local wmunications, inc., . . . countervailing state Interests Inhere in the present situation . . . For example, we do not wish to preclude a state or locality from exercising jurisdiction over certain elements of an SMATV operation that properly may fall within Its authority, such as zoning or public safety and health, provided the regulation In question s not undertaken as a pretext for the actual purpo e of frustrating achievement of the preeminent federal objective and so long as the non - federal regulation Is applied in a nondiscriminatory man er. 24. Similarly, we recognize here that there are certain general state and local Interests which may, in their even -ham "ed application, legitimately affect amateur radio facilities. Nonethe ess, there Is also a strong federal Interest In promoting amateur c unlcatlons. Evidence of this Interest may be found In the comprehe sine set of rules that the Commission has adopted to regulate the amateu� service.5 Those rules set forth procedures for the licensing of statlo 's and operators, frequency allocations, technical standards which amate r radio equlpmen•• must meet and operating practices which amateur operat�rs must follow. We recognize the Amateur radio service as a voluntary, noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to pr viding emergency communications. Moreover, the amateur radio service p ovides a reservoir of trained operators, technicians and electronic exper s who can be called on In times of national or local emergencies. By Its ature, the Amateur Radio Service also provides the opportunity for Indlvl ual operators to further International goodwill. Upon weighing then Interests, we 5 47 CFR Part 97. 2 ## sv% LEG F1ZSLS99EOZ Wd®Z:ZT 26 -ST -Z0 nNu I /iNNu : JAS iN3S a� belleve t. :!mited preemption policy is warranted. State and regulations that operate to preclude amateur communicatlons communities are in direct conf-Ilct with federal objectives at preempted. 25. Because amateur station c.)mmunlcatlons are only as the antennas employed, antenna height restrictions directly effectiveness of amateur communications. Some amateur anten configurations require more substantial installations than o are to provide the amateur operator with the communications desires to engage in. For example, an antenna array for int amateur communications will differ from an antenna used to c amateur operators at shorter distances. We will not,-howeve particular height limitation below which a local government regulate, nor will we suggest the precise language that must In local ordinances, such as mechanisms for special exceptlo or.condltlonal use permits. Nevertheless, local regulations Involve placement•, screening, or height of antennas based on or aesthetic considerations must be crafted to accommodate r amateur communications, and to represent the minlmum pra%tic to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose. local n their d must-be effective as ffect the hers If they hat he /she rnatlonal ntact other . specify any ay not be contained s, variances, which health, safety, asonably ble regulation 25. Obviously, we do not have the staff or financial lesources to review all state and local laws t`.ct affect amateur opera Ions. We are confident, however, that state and local governments will en eavor to legislate In a manner that affords appropriate recognition to the Important federal interest at stake here and tyereby avoid unnecessary conflicts with federal policy, as well !!s time - consuming and.expenslve iitl ation In thls area. Amateur operators who believe that local or state. gov rnments have been overreachin; e•: t6.erety have precluded accomplishment V their legitimate communicaT;ons goals, may, In addition, use this rr ument to bring our policies to the attention of local tribunals and f ms. 6 We reiterate that our ruling herein does not reach res rictIVe covenants in private contractual agreements. Such agreement are voIunTar IIy entered 'ito by the buyer or tenant when the agr ement Is ission. executed and do not .sually concern thi's Comm 27. Accordingly, the Request for Declaratory Rulin filed July 16, 1984, by the American Rad.lo Relay League, Inc., IS GRANT to the extent Indicated herein and, In ail other respects, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William J. Tricarico Secretary 0T# S09L L26 E-TESLS99E02 WCOV : T T 26 -ET -20 nNu I /121214 : A9 1N3S J / Zoning Districts A. Dishes : provided they are not greater than square,, eet in cross section area, or which do not exceed six feet in height as measured from the ground or point which the antenna is mounted to the roof to the highest point of the antenna. Current ;ordinance standards read: No greater than 30 inches in diameter or 5 square feet in cross section area.:' B. All Other Towers or Antennas: provided they do not exceed 6 feet in height as measured from the ground or point which the antenna is mounted to the. roof to the highest point of the antenna. C. City Antennas: antennas and towers erected by the City for City purposes. • Exempt antennas maybe ground or roof mounted and maybe located in the front, rear, or side yards of a property. • No more than one exempt antenna at anyone time on any single lot. _P Z 1,11aFrIVE.I.aq 1 A. Ground mounted towers or antennas shall not exceed 50 feet in height measured from the ground elevation at the base to the highest point of the tower or antenna. B. Towers and antennas mounted or attached to a building shall not extend more than 5 feet: bove the highest point of the roof. C. No antenna or tower shall be located in the front yard. D. No antennas or tower shall be located closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which it is located. A& 3 LT I! F.11 I I l I 1 MrITI. 1 • No antenna, tower, tower with antenna, or dish antenna shall be located closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which it is located. N Qty Setback Area VRINCIPAL:i6ii :I B I I i _ W O eSetback Area m2 ,....rr...- rr�r.. rr,•,•i,i I :: PAII��/iC eCDG�1 C� I A Non - conforming I Conforming A. Antenna B. Distance from antenna to principal building (B must be less than Q C. Distance from antenna to buildable area of adjacent lot by : :• Dishes greater than 9,square feet in cross sectional area or more than 6 feet in height require a permit and: A. Dishes shall not be located on the roof or exterior wall of principal or accessory building. B. Dishes shall only be located in rear yards. C. Dishes shall not exceed 12 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation at the base to the highest point of the dish. D. Dishes shall not be located closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which the dish is located. A. Ground or Roof Mounted Dishes: shall have a height of no more than $.1f ( as measured from the ground or point at which the antenna is mounted to the roof to the highest point of the antenna. B. No part of any dish shall be constructed or maintained, at any time, within any setback area of a principal building or structure that is required by the Zoning District in which the dish is located. C. Dishes shall not be located closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which the dish is located. -:�dG 41 ]1111 MI )==MMTM MMIN If Mai; MI MV Va-MITIN-Ii- i I M i I I PI kl' 1 i A. Antennas. Towers and Towers with Antennas: shall not exceed 75 feet in height as measured from the ground or base of the tower or antenna whichever is lower to the highest point of the antenna or tower with antenna. B. C. Roof Mounted Antennas: shall have a height of no more tha 18ee. measured from the base of the antenna to the top of the highest point of the antenna. D. No part of any antenna, tower or tower with antenna shall be constructed or maintained, at any time within any setback area of a principal building or structure required by the Zoning District in which the antenna, tower or tower with antenna is located. E. Antennas, Towers and Towers with Antennas shall not be located closer to the allowed buildable area of of a principal building on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which the antenna, tower or tower with antenna is located. M 11 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: GORDON HUGHES Agenda Item .# .IT.. c. i From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent Information Only Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Mgr. Recommends iii To HRA Subject: Z -91 -6 & S-91-8, 1 X i To Council FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT APPROVALI Action 7r Motion PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23RD ADDITION. _ x Resolution X Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval subject to: 1. Developers agreement including overall storm water management plan. 2. No windows on north elevation of units, minimum living space setback of 15 feet and 10 feet for garages from interior property line. INFO /BACKGROUND See, attached minutes, staff report and plans. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1992, 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Robert Hale, Lee Johnson, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, Virginia Shaw, David Byron, Charles Ingwalson and Geof Workinger MEMBERS ABSENT: John Palmer and Nan Faust STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner McClelland moved approval of the- December 4, 1991, meeting minutes. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS: Z -91 -6 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit & District to PRD -2, Planned Residence S -91 -8 District Final Plat Approval, Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition, Parkwood Knolls Const. Co. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission preliminary approval for the proposed rezoning was granted by the City Council in September of'1991. The proponent has returned with final development plans in support .of his request for final rezoning and final plat approval. Plans, submitted include a final plat, site plan, landscaping plan, grading, utility plans, and unit plans. The final development plans are essentially the same as those presented for preliminary approval. Minor adjustments have been made to individual lots within the plat. . The typical lot width will be about 79 feet.. Mr. Larsen pointed out The proposed final plans conform to all requirements of the PRD -2 district. ' 'The PRD -2 district accommodates the zero lot line concept since it only addresses setbacks along the perimeter of the development. Mr. Larsen explained the proposed final plat and final rezoning plans are consistent with approved preliminary plan and staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval with the following conditions: 1. Developers agreement to include storm water management plan for.all remaining vacant land. Mr. Harvey Hansen, proponent, was present to answer questions from the Commission. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Hansen how many undeveloped acres are left within the Parkwood Knolls plat. Mr. Hansen responded there are approximately 50 undeveloped acres left. Commissioner McClelland inquired if the east side of Malibu Drive would be developed with doubles or would it be developed with something similar to what is proposed this evening. Mr. Hansen said his intention is to develop the remaining portion of Parkwood Knolls with single family homes. Chairman Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the storm water management plan and it's implementation without knowing exactly how development will occur. Mr. Larsen said the storm water management plan was based on the plans presented and approved in 1977. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained in 1977 the plans depicted development of Parkwood Knolls with single family homes, and the storm water management plan was based on this assumption. Commissioner Runyan pointed out there are no drawings representing the north elevations of the proposed dwellings. Mr. Hansen responded all north elevations will be blank, no windows will be constructed on the north side of the dwellings. Continuing, Mr. Hansen said all homes will be custom built. Commissioner Johnson pointed out there could be a variety of housing designs and house sizes constructed on each lot. He expressed concern that future property owners may take liberties with what is constructed, and we could end up with a "massing" problem. Mr. Hansen said each dwelling will be constructed to comply with all setbacks, and all criteria of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the south building line has been represented at between 20 and 25 feet, and if the renderings presented this evening represent what Mr. Hansen will construct spacing between dwellings should be adequate. Commissioner Johnson pointed out by ordinance standards a house could be constructed closer then the 20 feet indicated on the site plans. Commissioner McClelland questioned if city lot coverage requirements would prevent over building on these lots. Mr. Larsen explained that setbacks for this zoning are established from the perimeter of the plat. Chairman Johnson said he has a concern regarding future homeowners who may desire to construct a house that is too large for the lot, and also desire windows on the north elevation of the house. Mr. Hansen responded that he would be willing to enter into an agreement with the city indicating that no windows or openings would be constructed on the north elevation of'each dwelling. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Hansen if he would allow different housing styles to be introduced into this development. Continuing, Commissioner Workinger said that while he believes in personal preference for house styles he has a concern that a traditional house may constructed next to a contemporary house which may create a development that isn't cohesive. Mr. Hansen said that he also agrees with personal preference in housing styles but added he intends that the styles of the proposed houses be similar, but with different variations. He concluded that it is in his best interest to develop an aesthetically pleasing development, that will be compatible with future single family homes. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hansen the price range of the proposed houses. Mr. Hansen responded that the price range will be in.the high $200's - low $3001s. Commissioner Workinger said that while he supports the concept of this proposal he wants assurance that there will not be a massing problem. Commissioner L. Johnson said that Mr. Hansen has a good reputation within the city but expressed concern after development is completed a property owner may wish to add on to their home. He pointed out this could create massing problems, and questioned how the city would deal with this situation if additions to the project were requested at a later date. Mr. Larsen explained that review would be required for any change in building pads and requested changes would be handled on a variance level. Commissioner Johnson suggested that it may to possible to attach to our recommendation for approval a condition that would establish- a firm setback from the south property line. This setback could be between 15 20 feet. This would eliminate our concern for over building on each lot, while maintaining greenspace on each lot. A discussion ensued between Commission Members and Mr. Hansen regarding setbacks and potential massing problems that could result from over building on each lot. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend final rezoning and final plat approval subject to plans as presented, subject to staff conditions, and the additional conditions that no windows or openings be constructed on the north elevation of each dwelling, that the south lot line setback be 15 feet'for living space, and that the garage be constructed no closer then 10 feet from the south lot line. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron abstained from the vote. Ayes; Hale, Fdust, L. Johnson, McClelland, Ingwalson, Shaw, Workinger, G. Johnson. Nays; none. Motion carried. 92 -1 Z -929-1 Lots 3 and 4, B Addition YiLot , Single Dwellin lling Unit Distr 3 1, Indian Hil1V 3rd District to R -2, Double t for westerly 1A feet Mr. Larsen informed he Commission Lot 3 's a vacant R -1 1 t. Lot 4 is a developed R- lot. The request o d transfer e westerly 5 feet of the acant lot to the veloped R -2 to Following he division the vacant lot would be reduced from 11 feet to 95 feet in width�a d would conform to oning ordinance requirement However, the t ansfer would create non- conforming zoning for a transferred pr erty. The strip o land should be rezoned to R , Double Dwellin unit District. Mr. Lars concluded staf recommends approva of the lot division and r oning. Mr. Lars n pointed out to t Commission that Lot 3 is on of the three lot recently rezoned f m R -2 to R- 1 district. St f views the rezo ing as a technical correction which will not ch ge the developmen pattern along McCa ey Trail. Chairman John o that runs through t Larsen explained th Chairman Johnson sai with Lot 3 instead c other side of the pc n asked Mr. Larse about the irregular of line e pond and creates "landlocked" parce Mr. t was the way the riginal plat was pl tted. it would be better to have that parcel r ain having two propert owners with land on he n . Commissioner McCl lland moved to commend lot division approval and rezoning pproval subject t the condition that everything south of th pond remain with of 3. Commissioner Johnson seconded the mot n. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 29, 1992 Z -91 -6 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit & District to PRD -2, Planned Residence B -91 -8 District Final Plat Approval, Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition, Parkwood Knolls Const. Co. Preliminary approval for the proposed rezoning was granted by the City Council in September of 1991. The proponent has returned with final development plans in support of his request for final rezoning and final plat approval. Plans submitted include a final plat, site plan, landscaping plan, grading, utility plans and unit plans. The final development plans are essentially the same as those presented for preliminary approval. Minor adjustments have been made to individual lots within the plat. The typical lot width will be about 79 feet. The proposed final plans conform to all requirements of the PRD -2 district. The PRD -2 district accommodates the zero lot line concept since it only addresses setback along the perimeter of the development. Two different unit plans have been submitted for this development. They are approximately the same size units with slightly varied floor plans. The exterior materials, roofing and landscaping will be used to tie the development together. There will be a homeowners association covering all eleven properties. In addition to the on -site engineering, public street and utility work required for this development, city staff is requiring a storm water management plan for all remaining undeveloped areas of Parkwood Knolls. Barr Engineering is preparing this study. We expect it to be complete prior to City Council consideration of Final Rezoning. The proposed final plat and final rezoning plans are consistent with approved preliminary plan and staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval with the following conditions: 1. Developers agreement to include storm water management plan for all remaining vacant land. New I SC/LE 1- -SU'0- PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23LD ADDITION PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23rd ADDITION MALIBU DRIVE Plant Material List Mlyr ' Ir , (IS) to NIrN — (IZ) It' -µ4I -{xav (19) It," 5f"cv woribw iul (n) 4A ;6 . n --f UTC r io I 2C' •N. M PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: T -30' 8� i� 0 i a D 9 NORTH �') g low e' ®6.T. t 100 yr.,:r 6.o% 12' P 4.6+6 B cis: 1 N Malibu Drive g — 11 cis: 10 yr 15 cis: 100 yr' a W 22 20 cis: 100 yr m • NL 884.6 tj.`a= O p 300 600 FL 889.2 0RR 6.7 AF IUr 20 Scale in Feet 1 m NL 816 16' FL 918.2 18 4.7 AF 24 , 15 cis 10 w P Z76� �� a2 4�'�rb 27 cis 100 yr Existing Storm Sewer 13 cis: 10 yr +d ® o O. 41 FL 804.8 t yr cis 10o yr c' '�� y �� Q +6,p4 Proposed Storm Sewer F� 4 e 0.9% 1 9 8 cis: 100 yr 2.2 AF ��,' 23 21 m9 143 cis: 10 yr um° 10 i3 sz �1� low _ 24-@ -56 _ie00 N 17 Q. 3.396 040% 22 cis 10 yr 72 cis 100 N 39 cis 100 w ° 7s cis lox a � 115 cis too x 9 cis N i6' @ 2.29c 17 cis 100 yr O 13 N g 14 15 Kelsey Drive 1 6 + 55 cis: 10 yr 64 cis: 10 yr „� @+ 91 cis: 100 Yr a J 74 CIS: 100 yr 1 2 a 18 cis 100 10 cis: 10 w _ 25 cis: 10 yr 47 cis: 100 yr O 1 2 O Green Farm Road O O cis 10 yr 13 cis 10 w Ridge Road 56 cis: 100 w ?2, + 25 cis 100 yr is `Brads goys A v 37 cis: 10 yr 20 cis 10 M m o o i O o 27 IO yr m 1 Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23RD ADDITION yetr IN I r E 7: _ _ O r IM --- -- 1u1 Inn .. _250 EGAN, FIELD 9 NOWAK. INC. ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF LOT SURVEYORS OAUpBEEARI a IOTCR CHEN °HILLS 3RD ADDITION WHICH IS RECORDED TO HAVE —, NON2 28 rI INCH OTHERWISE INCH E SHO MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. tp.f rf a' -- + 8 •Y,•N•R yl •'r•ff�"St . -- -- l'� �4 p.n..• � � <•« car• , 1 u. 7p� r.. L•IOt. I ..., I..1. l� S: 111 •lwl V� �11 I•P' �t; I1.1111r J'V [.O. LLL pO pI •M . ..rl..lp1 ,w•t r•rf•stl ,well• rawer rueels °w•P•e1. • cal nwrnt• rnr pnr •1Im. eVner w/ rM fe11r+1'•r beo ln•a Mr•. .. •w•M In tM rmney er Mwnepin, .Ut• ^f wlnn••nr• altoe ., rL.a.(r1D mw /I1. •Parole, • ®raI^. is .M Na tnu.er �, rn• w er sera 1^ •M srnm car lM .Mbtry car In 1••, p•neeplw r,+,n•,, nwe..ne.. 1\•t Mrt of tellee r, ,.wlYa I.OIJ/ 10,p LCa1,l A, eeeeral cap is lM plat tMrwf •n fll• w •/ re•er. I• lM efflm of t \• ,egl•l nr of ,11 b•, w '•eolw [ w1 e, .1•went e, oulro 11 •e ,mlMrl, nr • Iln• Mlro M •1 •prise . elrrt•. Il eeeerl4 �•• rap •r n •, 1e -vu(wv calve Iro .mtno•. re. p�rpn... .r [nl. „_..•1p• low tn. •nan u^. sr •.0 (^,l le• \ 1•e�uu�rt la 1r•• • r1 eprep tl e11w.•p I. •••awet• list. e•t.l .erpl 4m •• emlcelea Ica tM pl.l er r.1l.aae neUJ 101. •0111,10., •mere l... to 1M ,1.t --1 nw III• er sf '-d In tM ...... er tw• .platter of }Itlp, MwM,ln feuetl. .I neMet•. M• e•Mm [M car )Ib • N`me. •M a• M—v Mlew• t° tM ti \II• rw p.\II• ue• 'caveat lM ee•e••wte •• eMww m [nl• Ilel fee •r•IM.• .m •I II Ir1 p1rMw enll. Ica •ItM•• M••r —f -Id ,er•eee. pMll• taretreef Is rwp•w, • rler•el• oerpwel ls, \M op •m [Mp P—t. to M •I.—d 0,' 1•• ,r riper nlfl ^er tn1 ,__ eel e1 �_ 1 _ • Ip Te lerpellr. 11rer•e.nt p• •AweV1NpM Mfer• r 1111° 4, of 1.._ 4 Mr.p [. Mre•w, Irw la•wl of I•e1\ed Iv11• .. • rw l,w f.ep•ny, • 111 •a•en • rmpnr •elan. en rrri it of eM eei0er•rTa1. �p rl III 'f p \•r•rr e,relry we f Mw •w..,m •m pbet.. w wwwq .••w Ilea w al• PI•t .• n•tt.1Pe p\Pw um .ronle.l tree lnl• pl•l 1• • erreet r•I,r••�Il•alm of ••la •sr.nl en•t •11 elet 1.. • wtl, •nwa. In r «( •m wumr Wrn• o • reot; lnet •11 .OwseMl YH tr•11 00 act l/ placed 1. lM ..cam A. nave •m tn•t lM eut•le• Mu.t.r1 Ilw•• •r• rert•(t l/ ee•I,Mren1 •M In• an.r• •r• M rw 1•m•ree M •..I,M•m m Mla vl•te e rm" a IR."Im COLVI, oI pm it ,M fer•..Inp p'rr.•1•r•• Hre if le•t• w• ••l.wl•e.•1 Mfer• r tnl• d•, •/ 1., h J.cl MIM, p11V —. Llcan•• .e. IOt.I. Mm. rfomsef. ,\I• plat .f I.frpaer INGUA Item .nnmal w• •pprewa • A .aurae F w eft, Lbe••11 .f 011M, p1la .; .t • r•.VI.r .etlp lMrwf MI. t \I• 1•, •r 1,. If •,pllw \I•, tM wlta•w es•n(• •M r.emrmet levee e1 IM C— I••Ien•r n Ir.nepwlel l•• eN-r 11- -[wn1/ p)-j e� •rylwe dew Maw r•[vIM L, IM LII/ w tM preeerlwm ra a•r wtlm Me el•P•• +1. n._.r reslpt of e•m eeMewt• eM r•,rwem•t lane, M pe•lem \/ ■I,a. .1 •t u1 p. Mn[Inn .nl. uM. 1. [In (pa.CIL PI MISS. 01-- F Y,w •/ Ywe,er ".m" ,.p AND ,OpGt[ ./(app. Pfr.r111.pT, Mwep/• R•1•t,, ■leveret• 1 Mreb, wllfl leer t•eee p• /•el• Ie •m Prfor Iwre Mee a. "Id fw I.m "—aW eve t \I• ple[. M•ee !w1 _ _ ,.tram ■..•ps+er, ow'"pi, °sat, Mattw F D-11 .pprF pm.Itlp, psa•plw Drat'. ■11a••et. Mr•Mr.t to pin, w.l. Me. I•Ip.,ra I....1. t \l. plat M. ft— p'I—I -I. _ d., er In .•rw•N ■. "—. Mr•rpl. —t, fro, r F .mlwp.r w ,tnJY, .escarp l• [set,, .1•M.et• t Mr•F ewtlf, t\•t .I. .".I. PI•t wf I.111.p0a MIUS It" LIlpr,l0• — f11Y Ica NI• •tll— W. ae, of 1., •t ••else. . ■. .— — P. M. lf.1 —. M.1•tr•r e/ llti- .1 0•pr•e, W E S -r E L E V A 7 ON Vltr.• ?�_' F R O N T E' L E V A T 1 O. N �A':i'•o• 1 , 1 T y P 1 C 'A L P L O T PLAN 1� ___ _ T_ _ - •� 1;_ _ __ _1; S O O T H E L E V A T 1 O N %:i'•o• IuJ I•s b:.• W v�aeo: 4Ce> Roo., vu.ou� itr r.�pnP�✓ Cem�•ev YW CIw�rYngw� aY••I b Y ��. qdu . - 4Pa..nO °YE °'en'nbul C°Y•a ® fig �l�Q JJ PAwKUOOD Kn ousCwT.Gn J3.1 Vcaew Av a. GD�aA IwL[So1A M1 ��P■ f.J• N• U.: P4 %rt N n a H E, e y A T 1 0 w w:. -.• rn+ [Wars Ntuwae Fa [3`.uY r.ul oM.wl. F L 0 0 P. t' ♦ N y}:I .•• �IMIN4 QeeM `y / GweA,T Reo.1 FLB[e5rl.e. I " / I I 4• a 3 I t K I +cll[u • O r _ V / l4 7' 0 •8• V »lV• .B • PoACw ,! Dlre))t w •' r ]. rr,•t 4• t..1. 4. c•t• - � I Ili •�• y / GAR A4F F L 0 0 P. t' ♦ N y}:I .•• R -r u t L v IJORTN f LKv.T . 0 .11" PLA. W. 1101. -P4 I suger 5- OF -5 '� 1 FU __I;- Ay Be. R. 5- 41.- 7f2 J=7: Be. RM o ND FLOOt I v u - D n I I - — — .- — . If— N. 7..L- p q I Sot'. 5 0r 5 i W! S T E L E V A T � O N �.•.'o• _� . r.. •.ay ...s.� S E CT I O N�C•C� ✓• �-e� 0 IL= R O N T E L E V 'A T 1 O N j n•: .�. �Tre 5•.ay M.�.�- S O U T N C'L E V A T 1 O t y�.. —Tr. H.a• N.pa� AA37C0. SV�TL GRIT R A 4r �y FoyfR - .CMf 1 - 'j7p� _ J]711�1tiii T Lo• •. �I • 1 \ e..a 1 -- d T[.Y.Tf 1 D1YIN�RM. I v l �I i •. — CL.r M.o.r -V.— U. a� try :w::"" ••2 1. •.�. zj- % 1 F R a r L o o w P.,5+ �_ — -- — — — — — ----v I R e A oL E L E V A T 1 0 — N (.• —A...— — M - h- L -1 b U -D F FL T E L- e V^ -r i 'F• F:6.. L. V. O—A. t S.. G-0 ko • Ad. fL• I•. 1,.4.- f-4 15 w d T RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23RD ADDITION BE IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23RD ADDITION ", platted by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 18, 1992, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 1992. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 18, 1992, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of June, 1992. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk. . 4 gtNA. �1 o e • ��bHPOM��O� iB BB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: GORDON HUGHES From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Agenda Item # -1 t. D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Z-92-1, R-1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTR CT & LD -92 -1, LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD. JEFF GUSTAFSON. Recommendation: IT To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution . 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve lot division and approve rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Units District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District for the 15 feet of property to be exchanged. Staff recommends waiver of second reading for the rezoning. Info /Background: There is a ponding area to the rear or south of both properties. Lot 3 was platted to include the pond and a small area of dry land south of the pond. Lot 4 only includes area north of the pond. The Planning Commission has recommended a modification of the proposed lot division. This modification would leave the pond area and area south of the pond as part of lot 3. Lot 4 would acquire the 15 foot strip of land north of the pond. The rezoning can be viewed as a technical correction to insure consistency of zoning for each parcel. at the south 1 line setbac be 15 feet f living sp ce, and th t the garage b constructed closer the 10 feet om the sou lot line. mmissioner al on sec ded the tion. Comm* Toner Byron ab ained from t vote. Ayes, Hale, Fau , L. Johnson McClelland, In alson, Shaw, orkinger, G. ohnson. s; none. M ion carried. ONO" LD -92 -1 Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd AAddition Z -92 -1 R -1, Single Dwelling District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District for westerly 15 feet of Lot 3 Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Lot 3 is a vacant R -1 lot. Lot 4 is a developed R -2 lot. The request would transfer the westerly 15 feet of the vacant lot to the developed R -2 lot. Following the division the vacant lot would be reduced from 110 feet to 95 feet in width and would conform to zoning ordinance requirements. However, the transfer would create a non - conforming zoning for the transferred property. The strip of land should be rezoned to R -2, Double Dwelling unit District. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the lot' division and rezoning. Mr. Larsen pointed out to the Commission that Lot 3 is one of the three lots recently rezoned from R -2 to R- 1 district. Staff views the rezoning as a technical correction which will not change the development pattern along McCauley Trail. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen about the irregular lot line that runs through the.pond and creates a "landlocked" parcel. Mr. Larsen explained that was the way the original plat was platted. Chairman Johnson said it would be better to have that parcel remain with Lot 3 instead of having two property owners with land on the other side of the pond. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend lot division approval and rezoning approval subject to the condition that everything south of the pond remain with Lot 3. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C4 a U O LL U Q �A U t U !J f a n >I ma + 4c, 4gt/ � UEl4tt�lE la1'�� BLdM � for A.W. CKSIER aF lof l AIKK Mid U11t. 101 / O \ 3.l1►ry. l � \ a 9 VU x Iv u �Ate ri *-�� `y 6 p$ • AREA T BE ADDED TO LOT 4 ` /05 r v s F VP + PFMP0"..0PMry09WArWoM The 0r.1/1...,..0,.,...�. A�� ANOS +t7� ti,'1 ,s°ibirwwrn wM'r �•��s9w Lj- �' `p!4 moo. 7� , rrr�maia� .�wa+swo�m�o.��••�•r�+...a N,,..y o�y �0.Y7Y'�0.'��r�raw.r+��0..w.0..Ww rr / stllr 0. W1 DDS IA IDr `1�`rr �1 lip w lwm4 • PO�wrrrbV Yalsa�NY++a N� r5w/�wwmwr�wrrw�r.wr�4 F „waw.. 01A i WOU &of Lot 4_ ; OF REMAIN PART OF LOT 3 A% 5.W CPRAAEX Of iOf5 8U.X r i+Jp1lW }i1Lli -,fH.R4 Aoa-r.oa ._ pO " 1 -6,WLV 6IMeer lof3 Q � 4 4 � .z Y� 0 4 a� m M- lot k q— ZS/ -9l rwa�ra �b r� 2 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 3, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS-3RD ADDITION and That part of Lot 4, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 4, distant 56.47 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof, as measured along said northeasterly line, to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 4, distant 56.04 feet southeasterly of the southwest corner thereof and there terminating. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 3, E%CEPT that part of the northwest 15.00 feet, as measured at right angles to the northwest line thereof, which lies northeast of the southeasterly extension of the southwest line of Lot 4, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 4, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 4, distant 56.47 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof, as measured along said northeasterly line, to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 4, distant 56.04 feet southeasterly of the southwest corner thereof and there terminating. AND that part of the northwest 15.00 feet of Lot 3, as-measured at right angles to the northwest line thereof, which lies northeast of the southeasterly extension of the southwest line of Lot 4, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 804 and 825; 1 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992, and as recorded in the Minutes of the Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this February 18, 1992. City .Clerk 11 e (n REQUEST FOR PURCHASE s•. TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Worl��' VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 18 February, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: one Truck Mounted Sewer Jet Machine Company Amount of Quote or E3d 1. Higgins Municipal 1. $ 75,443.00 2. Fel -Able Pipe Tool Co. 2. $ 77,986.00 3. Rufferidge Johnson 3. No Bid 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Flexible Pipe Tool Co. $ 77,986.00 * *Low bid does not meet intent of specifications. GENERAL INFORMATION: This machine is used to clean sewers and is the first piece of equipment used on emergencies on sewer back -ups. This unit will replace a 1978 truck mounted sewer jet, Unit No. 70 -366. The ' financing for the purchase is from the utility fund. Please see attached memorandum on the recommendation for award. We have reviewed this issue and concur with the staff recommendation. Signature The Recommended bid is Public Works - Utilities. V within budget not wit*bj04e �n IQJallin. Finance Director Rosland Cfly Manager CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 13, 1992 TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works /City Engineer FROM: Dick Pelinka, Utility Superintendent SUBJECT: SPECIFICATIONS RE /TRUCK MOUNTED SEWER JET On January 23, 1992 bids were opened for a truck mounted sewer jet. Two bids were received. One from Higgins Municipal Equipment with a bid price of $75,443, and one from Flexible Pipe Tool Co. with a bid price of $77,986. We also received a no bid from Ruffridge Johnson. The unit bid by Flexible Pipe Tool Co. (HV 2000) meets our specifications 100 %. The bid from Higgins Municipal Equipment (CamelJet -1600) deviates from our specifications in several areas: 1. We bid a truck with a Caterpillar engine and an Allison automatic transmission with a Chelsea power take off. The specified power train could have been bid by either vendor. Higgins Municipal chose to bid a different power train combination,with a belt driven power take- off. In our view, the reason they bid this was to keep the bid price lower. 2. We also bid a unit designed to provide maximum protection for cold weather operation. Although there is a cold weather option package available from the factory, Higgins Municipal Equipment did not bid it. Cold weather protection is essential for proper winter operation in this climate. 3. In our specifications we call for the hydraulic hoses for the reel operation to be integral. On the CamelJet unit, the hydraulic hoses are not shielded and this presents a serious safety issue for the operator. 4. Also in our specifications, we ask for level wind mechanism which winds"600 ft onto the reel automatically. CamelJet this feature. a hose reel of 1" hose does not .offer r Therefore, I would recommend that we award the sewer jet bid to Flexible Pipe Tool Co. as the most responsible bidder. In my estimation, if Higgins Municipal Equipment would have met our specifications, their bid would be several thousand dollars higher. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland. City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 18 February; 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: New Lighting for Public Works Building Company Amount of Quote or 13id 1. United Electric 1. $ 7,296.00 2. Sterling Electric 2. $ 7,776.00 3. Graybar Electric 3. $ 7,852.80 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: United Electric $ 7,296.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a building upgrade for improved cost effective lighting within the Public Works building. The project is funded thru the capital improvement plan. This is for the purchase of the lighting units and Public Works personnel will install the system. Signature - The Recommended bid is within budget not Public Works Finance Director Rosland Cif Manager e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 .DATE: February 4, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV•C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Rotary mower includes 1985 trade -in. Company Amount of Quote or &d Cost Trade -in 1. North Star Turf $10,975 $2,500 1.. $8,475 2. MTI Distributing $11,245 $2,150 2. $9,095 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Star Turf $8,475 GENERAL INFORMATION: Purchase of 72" rotary mower /includes trade of 1985 Groundsmaster 220.62" rotary. Gl ign re Depa t The Recommended bid is within budget not within b get J allin, Fi nce Director Kenneth Rosland City Mana er ° —REQUEST FOR PURCHASE 'Ace- 0 Rbwwnn•J TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000 DATE: February 11, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. D . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Turf Sweeper for -Park Maintenance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Star Turf, Inc. 1. $9,980 2. MTI Distributing 2,$10,670 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Star Turf, Inc. $9,980 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement sweeper for 1970 Ryan Ground Groomer. Included in the 1992 Equipment Replacement Budget. The Recommended bid is within budget not w Department „ Finance Director enneth Rosland C* Manager -aA. U /01, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 2/13/92 AGENDA ITEM Iv. E . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Gasoline purchase for Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Rollins Oil Company $13,000 2. (Hennepin County Bid Price) 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Rollins Oil GENERAL INFORMATION: Request for a year long purchase order for gasoline delivery at Braemar Maintenance Building and Braemar Executive Course Clubhouse. ' Department i The Recommended bid is X within budget not within 00 f WaAh, Finance Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE o,; V � , TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: February 13, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV . F . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fertilizer Purchase for Braemar Golf Course Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Precision Turf $6,660 2. Turf Supply Company 2• $6,750 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Precision Turf $6,660 GENERAL INFORMATION: Purchase of fairway fertilizer for 18 hole and Executive Courses at Braemar. Par ex 24 -4 -12 ture The Recommended bid is within budget not Kenneth Rosland Finance Director Manager, 911 �. _1Il REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin Direc +-or Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: February 13, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. G . ITEM DESCRIPTION: 3 gang hydraulic mower for Braemar Golf Cours6 Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Star Turf 1. $8,875 2. MTI Dist. 2, $9,406 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Star Turf $8,875 GENERAL INFORMATION: 3 gang hydraulic mower with 3 wheel drive and grooved rollers. Mower is an addition to our finer trimming equipment. We have added areas on the course that all mow more frequently. These areas include all areas around greens, tees and traps three times a week. Included now are the areas around the main clubhouse, putting green and executive course clubhouse. With two mowers we couldn't get to all areas before heavy pla starts. This addition allows us to start on 3 different points on the co and finish with the clubhouse area,. It keeps the course free of mowers around the greens during morning leagues. Included in the 1992 equipment Sign ure Department The Recommended bid is within budget not with' u e n Zin, Finance Director / — - -- Kenneth Rosland, C# Manager rse udget. k 11'I2, ° ' N° REQUEST FOR r� PURCHASE TO: MAYOR RICHARDS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: RALPH CAMPBELL, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 1992 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: CITY MAGAZINE PRODUCTION SERVICES Company Amount of Quote or Bid �• J. PATRICK MOORE • 10,905.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J. PATRICK MOORE GENERAL INFORMATION: PRODUCTION SERVICES FOR THE WINTER 1992 ISSUE OF "ABOUT TOWN" Signatq v Department The Recommended bi. is within budget not wi`/0-b Finance Directomr Manager k91�........,�Z1 0, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO. MAYOR RICHARDS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: RALPH CAMPBELL, DIRECTOR OF COMP'lUNICATIONS VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV.z ITEM DESCRIPTION: CITY MAGAZINE PRINTING • Company Amount of Quote or &d �• J..PATRICK MOORE . 7,433.21 2. 2. 3. 3 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J. PATRICK MOORE GENERAL INFORMATION: PRINTING FOR THE WINTER 1992 ISSUE OF "ABOUT TOWN" The Recommended bid is within budget not witblhAu,dbg Kenneth Roslan' ' allin, Finance Director Manager il V. (A) MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 11, 1992 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Robert Sherman MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Peggy DeMarsh, 7603 Stonewood Court Ms. Jeanette Doyle, 5905 Long Brake Trail Deputy Chief Leonard Kleven, Edina P.D. Mr. Eric Felton, Edina P.D. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Request to install a "STOP" sign at the intersection of Stonewood Court and Long Brake Trail. Petition received from 44 local residents. ACTION TAKEN: Ms. Jeanette Doyle and Ms. Peggy DeMarsh, residents of the Long Brake Trail /Stonewood Court area, appeared before the Committee on behalf of the petitioners. Ms. Doyle presented photographs of the intersection, pointing out what residents feel is a vulnerable situation for children waiting for the school bus. According to Mr. Hoffman, Deputy Chief Kleven had recommended considering either stopping Long Brake Trail at Stonewood Court or installing a "YIELD" sign at that location; that is, controlling the westbound leg of the intersection as opposed to the southbound leg, because of visibility issues. Mr. Kleven reported that such an action would coincide with the most recent change in state law stating that turning motion has to yield to through motion at a February 11, 1992 Page 2 "T" intersection. Mr. Hoffman asked whether any accidents had been reported at the intersection. Mr. Kleven stated there had been no accidents reported during the past three years, although Ms. Doyle said that her own vehicle had been rear -ended in front of her driveway on Long Brake Trail two years ago. Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee recommend the installation of a "STOP" sign westbound on Long Brake Trail at Stonewood Court. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion passed 5 -0. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. None. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Discuss traffic signal study on Gleason Road at Vernon Avenue. Continued from December meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reminded the Committee that this issue had been continued from the December meeting pending receipt of accident information from the Police Department. At issue is whether a traffic signal should be installed on Gleason Road at Vernon Avenue, an area identified by a recent Hennepin County study as possibly warranting such action. Mr. Hoffman'stated his concern that installation of a signal would make it easier for traffic traveling to the Opus complex, and thus increase traffic volume on Vernon Avenue west of Gleason Road. Mr. Kleven said that six Accidents had been reported at the intersection between 01/01/88 and 12/31/91, resulting in five written reports. Of those five accidents, two were the result of vehicles traveling eastbound on Vernon Avenue failing to yield at Gleason Road, two resulted from vehicles traveling too fast for conditions, and one was the result of unsafe lane usage. In Mr. Kleven's opinion, the two accidents resulting from failure to yield could have possibly been avoided by a stop sign or semaphore at the intersection. Mr. Hoffman stated that the warrant for traffic signals was five accidents per year, and that the city would be required to pay three - fourths of the cost of the signal, or approximately $70,000. Mr. Hughes said that he had spoken with former Traffic Safety Committee member Lois Coon, who expressed her feelings that a signal light would I February 11, 1992 Page Three not be appropriate, and that perhaps enacting peak hour turn restrictions (such as left turn restrictions both eastbound Vernon Avenue and northbound Gleason Avenue to westbound Vernon Avenue) might be a better solution. One drawback to that alternative would be the possibility of traffic filtering back through the Parkwood Knolls area to get around the diversion. Mr. Hoffman wondered if the residents who live west of Vernon Avenue ought to be the ones to petition for a light. Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee defer the issue until 3 -6 months after metering is imposed on the Gleason Road interchange at the Crosstown Highway and the various Crosstown exits and entrances, and its impact has been assessed. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hughes. The motion passed 5 -0. (2) Traffic study update from City Council public hearing regarding Tracy Avenue between Valley View Road and West 70th Street. Continued from December meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Following a February 3, 1992, public hearing by the City Council on the Tracy Avenue issue, the Council requested that Mr. Hoffman report back to them on March 2, 1992, regarding the following four options: a. Traffic control/Valley View Road and Antrim Road. b. Traffic control /Tracy Avenue (possibly installing a control and crosswalk at West 68th Street and Tracy Avenue for the students walking to and from the high school). C. Traffic direction signage (no right turns /no left turns during peak hours. Although this issue will be studied by a consultant, Mr. Hoffman said that it probably isn't an option unless all the neighbors agree to it). d. Pedestrian safety /sidewalks (install a crosswalk on the east side of Tracy Avenue from West 66th Street to West 68th Street. The 12 homeowners facing Tracy Avenue along the two -block stretch would pay for the sidewalk). The Council rejected the following two options: a. Traffic diversion /neighborhood. b. Traffic review and control /Industrial Park. February 11, 1992 Page Four Mr. Kleven reported that three additional speed surveys had been conducted at Tracy Avenue and Susan Avenue since 01/13/92. The 85th percentile for southbound traffic was 33 miles per hour; for northbound traffic, the 85th percentile was 32 miles per hour. Mr. Hoffman noted that those numbers indicate that the 25- miles -per- hour advisory speed sign does not work. (3) Discuss traffic safety concerns at the intersection of Rabun Drive and West 70th Street. Request received from Susan McConville, 4405 Norwood Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota. Ms. McConville had written to Mayor Richards on behalf of her parents, who live on Abercrombie Drive, requesting that the "NO TURN ON RED" signage be extended beyond the peak hours of 7 -9 a.m. and 4 -6 p.m. Mr. Hoffman reported that the problem had been discussed in 1988, when the issue centered around whether a traffic light might be an appropriate solution. Mr. Kleven said that 15 citations had been written for violations of the "NO TURN ON RED" signage since 11/01/91 as part of regular traffic enforcement. Mr. Huehes moved that the matter of extendine the "NO TURN ON RED" signage to a 12 -hour period from 6 :00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. be referred to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for consideration. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. o e ip �\ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman.' City Engineer Date: 18 Februray, 1992 Subject: Public Hearing Feasibility Report & Set Hearing Date Blake Road Street Improvement BA -298 Storm Sewer Improvement STS -218 & Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -382 Recommendation: Set hearing date of March 2, 1992. Agenda Item # ° • B Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Eil To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Info /Background: The following proposed projects have been reviewed and are considered feasible: Location: Blake Road from Pine Grove Road to Interlachen Boulevard. Improvement: BA -298 Street Surfacing, Curb and Gutter, and Sidewalk Estimated Cost - $ 645,028.91 STS -218 Storm Sewer Estimated Cost - $ 40,753.00 SS -382 Sanitary Sewer Estimated Cost - $ 21,000.00 Staff would suggest possible hearing date of. March 2, 1992. Funding for BA -298 would be from state aid funds and proposed assessment. Funding for STS -218 and SS -382 would be from storm sewer utility and utility funds. AA �. �0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # v.c. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 0 To Council SCHEDULE OF HEARINGS, DRAFT EDINA CODE Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt proposed hearing schedule. Info /Background: Attached for your consideration is the proposed hearing schedule for various elements of the City Code. Based upon this schedule, it is our hope to complete the adoption process by June 15, 1992. Staff has identified the following four alternatives for public notification: Newspaper Ad: A newspaper ad in the Edina Sun - Current would cost approximately $275.00 for a quarter page ad. This ad would be the same size as that used for Truth in Taxation hearing notices. Letter to Interest Groups: The major changes to the City Code are directed at relatively few property owners and residents. Therefore, we believe that we could identify many of the residents who would be affected by the amendments or Report /Recommendation - Codification Hearing Dates February 18, 1992 Page two organizations that represent such affected parties and notify them by special mailing. Publication in "About Town ": Information would be published in About Town on April 1, 1992, and distributed by April 10, 1992. About Town could contain an extensive article concerning Codification and could also include a postage -paid postcard that could be used by a resident who wished to respond to particular issues that should be considered by the Council. This issue of About Town would be fully distributed more than three weeks prior to the May 4, 1992, hearing on recreational vehicles and seven weeks prior to the first hearing on the adoption of the entire code. Individual Mailed Notice: The City could send individual mailed notices to each resident and business - owner. Attached are examples of a letter or a postcard that could be sent. The major disadvantage with this option is cost which we would estimate at $4,000 to $7,000, depending upon the options selected. Recommendation: Staff believes that adequate notice could be accomplished through a combination of an advertisement in the Sun Current, an article in About Town, and notice to residents or organizations who may be interested in particular sections of the code. PROPOSED CODIFICATION HEARING DATES DATE March 16, 1992 April 6, 1992 May 4, 1992 June 1, 1992 CODE SECTION Section 475 PARKING RAMP INSPECTIONS Section 410 OPTIONAL CHAPTERS of the BUILDING CODE INCLUDING SPRINKLERS Section 215 PROHIBITION OF GAMBLING Section 460 SIGNS Section 1045 RECREATIONAL VEHICLES FIRST READING OF ENTIRE CODE June 15, 1992 SECOND READING OF ENTIRE CODE 4 O Thursday March 5, 1992 Dear Edina Resident, Sample Letter City of Edina On June 15, 1992, the Edina City Council will complete a year -long review of all Edina city ordinances. The purpose of this review is to bring the Edina City Code up to date so it better responds to the wishes of Edina residents and businesses. You are an important part of this ordinance adoption and I want you to know how you can be involved. Before the Council adopts the new city code it will conduct a number of public hearings. Here is the hearing schedule: HEARING CODE DATE SECTION TOPIC March 16 475 Parking Ramp Inspections 410 Portions of the Building Code (including residential and commercial fire prevention inside sprinkling systems April 6 . 215 Gambling Prohibition 460 Signs May 4 1045 Recreational Vehicles June 1 First Reading of the Entire Code June 15 Second Reading (Final Enactment) You are invited to all of these code revision public hearings. The Council and I are most interested in your comments and suggestions. Your ideas will belimost effective if you personally convey them during the appropriate hearing. If you cannot attend, please feel free to write me at city hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina MN 55424. Very truly yours, Fred Richards MAYOR City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -139.3 TDD (612) 927 -5461 City of Edina Public Hearing Notice On June 15, 1992, the Edina City Council -will complete a year -long review of all Edina city ordinances. The purpose of this review is to bring the Edina City Code up to date so it better responds to the wishes of Edina residents and businesses. Before the Council adopts the revised city code it will conduct a series of public hearings as follows: HEARING CODE DATE SECTION TOPIC March 16 475 Parking Ramp Inspections 410 Portions of the Building Code (including residential and commercial fire prevention inside sprinkling systems April 6 215 Gambling Prohibition 460 Signs May 4 1045 Recreational Vehicles June 1 First Reading of the Entire Code June 15 Second Reading (Final Enactment) You are invited to all of these code revision public hearings. Your ideas will be most effective if you personally convey them during the appropriate hearing. If you cannot attend, please send your views to City Codes Comments, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina MN 55424. w91NA. �1 cn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: GORDON HUGHES Agenda Item # V . D . From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 1-494 JPO To Council PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Action ❑ Motion AGREEMENT. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve JPO staff services agreement for 1992. Info /Background: The JPO has hired a.one -half time staff person for calendar year 1992. This is the same person and time commitment as in 1991. The JPO will pay $15,750.00, which is within our budget. One -half of this cost is paid by the Met Council through a federal transit grant. Expenditures in excess of $5,000.00 by the JPO require approval by the City Councils of four of the five member cities. K PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement, dated this 1115'h day of , 1992, is entered into between the City of Bloomington, a municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City ") and the 1 -494 Corridor Advisory Commission, an entity formed under the joint powers statute, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, (hereinafter the "Commission "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Commission has been formed to implement the recommendations of the 1 -494 Corridor Study, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Commissioh seeks to employ a planner to provide it with technical and administrative services; and. WHEREAS, The Commission has selected Don Jensen, an associate planner currently employed by the City of Bloomington, to continue to provide the Commission with part -time technical and administrative services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, terms, and conditions contained herein, the City and the Commission agree as follows: The City agrees to provide the technical and administrative services of, City Associate Planner Don Jensen to the Commission for an average of 20 hours per week for the period of January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992. The Commission agrees pay to the City up to, but not exceed the amount of $15,750 to cover the salary of Mr. Jensen when he is providing staff services to the Commission for the period detailed in this Agreement. Requests for payment may be made quarterly with final payment by December 31, 1992. The City and the Commission agree that Mr. Jensen shall at all times remain in exclusive, full -time employee of the City of Bloomington for all purposes including but not limited to wages, salary, and employee benefits, and that Mr. Jensen's employment status with the City will not be affected by the arrangement detailed in this Agreement. The City will continue to pay Mr. Jensen salary and benefits as agreed upon in a separate labor agreement, and the amount paid to the City by the Commission is a reimbursement to the City for the expenses associated with providing the part -time technical and - -- administrative services of_Mr. Jensen to the Commission. -- - page 1 of 2 `r All materials produced by Mr. Jensen when providing services under this Agreement shall be the property of the Commission. The term "materials" includes all documents, data, reports, studies, and maps. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 1'992 or upon the expiration of 30 days after service of written notice upon the other party. In the event of a termination prior to December 31, 1992, a compensation refund from the City to the Commission shall be prorated to reflect the period remaining on the Agreement at the time of termination. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees from all actions, liability, and damages resulting from the acts, omissions, or ne ct of Mr. Jensen in his performance of the obligations described herein. CITY OF Reviewed and approved by By: the City Attorney. ity A orney CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Mayor By: Manager CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: Mayor By: Manager CITY OF EDINA By: Mayor Planning /SpecRpt/ Prof. agr Paps 2 of 2 By: Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD By: anager , z�A oe, o A" reea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # vI , A,. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only. ❑ Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: To Council COMMUNICATION FROM Action Motion MR. RONALD D. EDBLOM ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Attached is a letter from Mr. Ronald D. Edblom, relative to our Ordinance regulating "Physical Culture and Health Services and Clubs ". This is the second letter that Mr. Edblom has addressed to the City Council relative to this Ordinance. Based on Mr. Edblom's concerns,*I recommend that Section 1340 (Physical Culture and Health Services and Clubs), be added to the list of Code Sections that will be heard by the City Council. (over) TO: Mr. Gordon L. Hughes and Members of the City Council From: Mr. Ronald U. Edblom 610 84th Lane N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Home Phone 784 -4461 Work Phone 925 -2700 I am writing to you to express my desire to run a professional theraputic massage business in the City of Edina, having several employees working for me . I would like the city to give me the respect and fairness that you would any other professional business, and to take a serious look. at the issues to be addressed. I have several problems with the existing ordinances the city currently has dealing with massage: 1. I wish not to be grouped in, or associated with massage parlor, sauna parlor or escort service. 2. 1 think that it is unfair that I should have to pay a $1500.00 investigation fee, as I have already been very throughly investigated last year and again this year. 3. The $200.00 annual business license fee, is unfair. in that'other businesses considered as personal pampering; nails, facialsq barber shops$ pay a $54.00 fee which is good for three years. 4. I should not have to reapply for a license every year. I am currently doing massage under what you call an individual massage licenseq in a Nail and Facial Salon. The r L owner of the salon has had no investigation fees and pays $50.00 for a three year license, and has a notice sent to her when license fees are due again, and not a reapplication every year. I am looking to rent my own office space center, and they want a five year lease sign a five year lease, not knowing if I from year to year? This brings me to my problem: 5. My license states that it is good revoked sooner. in Southdale office signed. How can I will be licensed fifth and sixth for one year unless 6. The application asks for a physical description with a front and side view picture of myself. These two issues imply that I am doing something wrong, or are about to, and I feel insulted and discriminated by this. I also take issue with reading such things as, "Employees of all businesses licensed hereunder must remain and be fully clothed." I would like to own and operate a very professional massage business in the city of Edina in a medical district, operation five to seven rooms doing 1/2 , 1, 1 1/2 hour massages, hiring qualified employees. I am Ronald David Edblom - I am a very good judge of character and I am deserving and worthy of receiving the opportunity of operating this type of business. I have a very wonderful gift to give the world, and I wouldsappreciate your time and energy to help me get my wants, needs and desires met. I am looking for a waver so that I may expand my life experiences. I have not come to you prematurely and have worked hard to put all my energy dreams and visualization towards this goal. Your time has been greatly appreciated. P Yours trulya Ronald David Edblom /lrl 0 0 o e 4:� ch O .�y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: GORDON HUGHES From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Subject: REQUEST FOR PERMIT TO INSTALL CELLULA ANTENNA SYSTEM AT 494 & VIKING DRIVE Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # _K % -B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion In the event the Council does not lift the Antenna moratorium representatives for Cellular One have asked for an exception to the Ordinance to allow installation of an antenna at 4940 Viking Drive. Attached to this cover is a letter from Peter Beck explaining their request. Staff has reviewed the plans and specifications for the installation. The antenna would comply with requirements of the existing as well as the proposed ordinance. JAMES P. LARKIN ROBERT L. HO F FMAN JACK F. DALY D. KENNETH LINDGREN GERALD H. FR I EDELL ALLAN E. MULLIGAN JAMES C. ERICKSON EDWARD J. DR15COLL GENE N. FULLER DAVID C. SELLERGREN JOHN 0, FULLMER ROBERT E. BOYLE FRANK 1. HARVEY CHARLES 5. MODELL CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN JOHN R. BEATTIE LINDA H. FISHER THOMAS P. STO LTHAN M ICHAEL C. JACKMAN JOHN E. DI EHL JON S. SWIERZEWSK1 THOMAS J. FLYNN JAMES P. OUINN TODD 1. FREEMAN STEPHEN B. SOLOMON PETER K. BECK J EROME H. KAHNKE SHERRILL R. OMAN GERALD L. BECK JOHN B. LUNDOUIST DAYLE OLAN CILIBERTO- THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, JR. MICHAEL T. MCKIM JOHN A. COTTER BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILEP January 29, 1992 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGBEN, LTD. PAUL B PLUNKETT ALAN L. KILDOW ATTORNEYS AT LAW KATHLEEN M. NEWMAN MICHAEL B. LEBARON GREGORY E. KORSTAD GARY A. VAN CLEVE DONNA L. ROBACK 1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER JEFFREY C. ANDERSON 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH DANIEL L. BOWLES TODD M. VLATKOVICH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 TIMOTHY J. MCMANU5 MICHAEL A. ROBERTSON TELEPHONE 16121 835-3800 LISA A. GRAY GARY A, RENNEKE FAX 16121 896 -3333 SHANNON K. MCCAMBRIDGE CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISTHAL MARIKAY CANAGA LITZAU TIMOTHY J. KEANE WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH, JR. - JOHN J. STEFFENHAGEN DANIEL W. VOSS MARK A. RURIK JOHN R. HILL JAMES K. MARTIN TNOMA5 J. SEYMOUR MICHAEL J. SMITH RENAY W. LEONE FREDERICK K. HAUSER D7 MARY E. VOS _ LOREN A. SINGER LARRY D. MARTIN Mayor Frederick S. Richards Members of the City Council City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 OF COUNSEL WENDELL R. ANDERSON CHARLES R. WEAVER JOSEPH GITIS RICHARD A. NORDBYE -ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN Re: ACC /McCaw Cellular Telephone Company Application for Building Permit for Cellular Antenna Site Dear Mayor Richards and Council Members: This letter is to request that the application of ACC /McCaw Cellular Telephone Company (Cellular One) for a building permit to construct a cellular antenna site at the Pentagon Office Tower be put on the agenda for the City Council's February 18, 1992, meeting. Cellular One is.one of two providers of cellular telephone service in the Twin Cities metropolitan,area. Cellular One,has been operating its metropolitan area cellular telephone system since 1984, pursuant to a license issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This system, which began with two cellular antenna sites, now has many antenna sites located throughout the metropolitan area. The nature of cellular telephone technology is such that as the customer base increases the number of antenna sites must increase as well, because each antenna can handle a fixed number of calls at any given time. Cellular antenna sites are located according to two criteria: capacity and coverage. Cellular One's FCC license'requires L ARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mayor Frederick S. Richards Members of the City Council January 29, 1992 Page 2 it to provide adequate telephone service over the entire metropolitan area. The network of antenna sites is carefully designed so that this coverage can be maintained. Capacity demands on the system vary from location to location. For instance, cellular antenna sites located in close proximity to high volume roadways are heavily used and will tend to reach capacity earlier than other sites. At the present time Cellular One is experiencing capacity problems in four areas of the network. The most severe capacity shortage is occurring in the area generally north and east of the intersection of Highways 494 and 100. This capacity shortage means that some customers cannot get on the system during peak user times, because all channels available at the antenna sites which serve that area are full. Those users who do get on the system experience some severe quality problems because the nearest cell site is too far away. Cellular One has engineered a solution to current capacity problems for its users. This solution involves the establishment of four new antenna sites in the metropolitan network. These four new sites must go on the air together, because the entire system will be adjusted and realigned. Among these four new antenna sites is the proposed antenna site on the Pentagon Office Tower at 4940 Viking Drive. Cellular One has entered into a lease with the owners of the Pentagon building for space inside the building for switching equipment and space on the roof of the building for six small antennas. After entering into this lease Cellular One conducted the necessary engineering studies, designed the necessary equipment, and applied with the City of Edina for the necessary permits - -as it had done for two existing cellular antenna sites in the City. However, when'the necessary applications for building permits were submitted earlier this month Cellular One was informed of the Council's moratorium on the issuance of permits for antennas. For a variety of reasons, mostly related to the construction industry, cellular telephone.usage peaks in early spring. For this reason, Cellular One has been doing the necessary planning all winter to put the four new antenna sites referred to above on the system by the end of March. All four sites must go on the system together, and it is imperative that the additional capacity which these four sites will provide be operational by the end of March. Construction of the Pentagon building antenna site will take a minimum of 30 days, including the necessary interior construction activities, mounting of antennas, equipment wiring, and pretesting. We understand that the moratorium has been in effect since March 13, 1991; that the LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mayor Frederick S. Richards Members of the City Council January 29, 1992 Page 3 City Council has reviewed a draft antenna ordinance and will do so again in a work session this Saturday; that a public hearing has been scheduled for February 18, 1992 on the antenna ordinance; and that the ordinance could be effective and the moratorium withdrawn as early as February 26, 1992, if adopted on February 18, 1992. If this is the case, Cellular One is confident that, with a lot of hard work, it can complete the necessary construction and have the Pentagon building site ready to go on the air with the other three at the end of March. However, our concern is that if action is not taken on the ordinance on February 18, 1992, a continuance even to the next City Council meeting would make it impossible for Cellular One to complete construction and have the antenna on the air by the end of March. It is our understanding that there has been no controversy during the discussion of the new antenna ordinance over building mounted antennas in commercial areas, such as those which Cellular One has at two existing locations in Edina and proposes for the Pentagon building. It is also our understanding that the proposed ordinance would allow the antenna site as proposed for the Pentagon building. We are therefore writing this letter to request that our application for a building permit be put on the City Council's agenda for discussion following the Council's action on the new antenna ordinance. If the antenna ordinance is adopted, as expected, and construction can proceed on the Pentagon building antenna site before the end of February, there would be no need to discuss our request. If a decision is made on February 18, 1992,,to defer action on the antenna ordinance, we request that the City Council consider our building permit at that meeting. Our request is that we be allowed to proceed either by means of an amendment to the moratorium to allow building mounted antennas in commercial areas or, perhaps, a variance or exception from the moratorium for this specific site. We would not make this request if it were not absolutely imperative that the Pentagon building antenna be on line by the end of March. As, one element in an array-of many antenna sites, this site is necessary for Cellular One to meet its obligation under its FCC license to provide adequate service to all of its metropolitan area customers, particularly those who live,,work, shop and pass through the area of Edina generally north and east of the Highway 100/494 interchange. Cellular One's customers affected by the capacity problems in this area of the system include many citizens of the City of Edina and many public safety and service personnel; including the City of Edina, which has 11 phones. L.ARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mayor Frederick S. Richards Members of the City Council January 29, 1992 Page 4 We will attend the February 18, 1992, meeting of the Council to present this request in person, if necessary, and to answer any questions. We appreciate your consideration. Very truly yours, Peter K. Beck, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. kw cc: Carrie•Schnelker, Esq. Max Thompson PKB:GX7s .'L i �91wt�r� A. 0 P' A' 4 Cn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To; GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT MANAGER From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date. FEBRUARY 14, 1992 Subject. PETITION FOR VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC PARK LANDS, OPEN SPACE AND STORM WATER POND AND HOLDING AREA Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI . c Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ T To HRA Eil T To Cou Action ❑ M Motion Resolut ❑ O Ordinan ❑ D Discus Adoption of a resolution by the Council setting March 16, 1992 as hearing date on the petition for vacation of utility easement and public park lands, open space and storm water pond and holding area. Info /Background A petition has been filed with the City requesting the above referenced vacation for property in INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION - The Lincoln Apartments. Staff would recommend that March 16, 1992 be set as hearing date to consider the facation petition. Copy of petition is attached. CITY OF EDINA Ji 1 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION Date Initiated 217/92 1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right -of -way: Street Drainage Easement 2• r'ii'.1 ?rill i1 Alley 1. Utility Easement _ti <Y.�• ,I ,t:s:c� ^. Other Public Park lands, public open space and storm wate(Jlescribe) pond and nolding area Legal description of area proposed to be vacated: 1. See Exhibit A attached 2. See Exhibit B attached Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation. Survey attached as Exhibit C. L COLN DR PARTNERS a MN Ltd.. Par - Signature 44.— Norman nnes, J ., GeneraI Address 401 Crovel and Avenue Partner Minneapolis, MN 55403 Telephone (612) 874 -1102 2) Review CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable = Opposed Conditional Conditions MINNEGASCO by Acceptable =Opposed F71 Conditional Conditions N.W. BELL by Acceptable Opposed Conditional Conditions N.S.P. by Acceptable =Opposed Conditional Conditions ' 10 -3800 EXHIBIT A The dedicated drainage and utility easement in and to that part of the west three hundred sixty-five (365) feet of the south two (2) feet of the north 35 feet of Lot 1, Block 2 INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDMON, according to the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies above the surface of a plane at an elevation of 889.7 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. EXHIBIT B The dedicated easements for public park lands, public open space and storm water pond and holding area in and to the easterly twenty (20) feet of Outlot A, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies east of the northerly extension of the west lines of Lots 29 through 35, Block 1 in said INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, but reserving the easement for utility and drainage purposes in and to such premises granted by the Easement for Public Utilities Purposes, by and between Wallace B. Kenneth and Jean M. Kenneth and the City of Edina, Minnesota, dated May 14, 1984, and recorded as Document No. 4894325 in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. �c9ti�lli;' o e `i� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #-=.A. From: Francis Hof fman i Consent ❑ r City Engineer (.A' Information Only 0 Date: 18 February, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: MTC Bus Route Change - ❑ To Council Route 35H Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: For information and comment if desired. Info /Background: The attached letter has been submitted for review by staff. This information is provided for Council review and comment if desired. The route change will eliminate. small route sections and actually extend the 35H route by starting at the Fire Station and going north, then east on Benton. The eliminated portions would be the "around the block" stop at Grove and Stuart and a short trip deviation down Tingdale then back up the west frontage road. The ridership is such that the changes should not create any particular hardship. C7 M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O M M I S S I O N 560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400 February 10, 1992 Mr. Francis Hoffman 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Fran: The MTC is proposing to reroute and reschedule Route 35H service in western Edina. The proposed new service would be extended from the current terminal at Stuart and Grove to a new terminal at Colonial Way and Tracy Avenue. The proposal would have buses layover on Colonial Way at Tracy Avenue near the fire station. Buses would follow Colonial Way to Olinger Blvd. to Benton Avenue to Normandale Blvd. Bus service to the Stuart and Grove area and the Good Samaritan Church Park /Ride lot would be discontinued. However, should MTC receive concurrence to operate on Colonial Way, Service Planning staff will contact Colonial Church to establish a new Park and Ride lot there. Bus service to Tingdale Avenue, Valley View Drive, (west of Normandale) and west Normandale Blvd. would be discontinued due to low ridership. Bus service east of Normandale Blvd. will not be affected by these changes. If the MTC receives concurrence from the City of Edina for these route changes, the new service would be implemented effective March 30,1992. Please call me at 349 -7684. should you have any questions regarding this request. Sincerely, Scott Thompson Transit Planner Service Planning & Scheduling SC /tmc /002 9M EFFECTIVE. 3 -30 -92 NEW FARES DOWNTOWN TURNAROUND AND LAYOVER ss HEYWOOD GARAGE qy 0 Downtown Minneapolis , o s Mwr 551OLSOM Mwr. �St, (SEE INSET) f s, gym: 1 s�o • `r ■ 6TH AV- — F fat Park and Ride ■ ■ ■ ■ ■, Fan Uadt Hwv� � ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦' ♦ �� ■ Points of Interest 6t�'J� ♦ �. 1 ❑ Time Point 309 *�� ai• * -� I: �; i i If t°1` i 1*1 'W ♦ 4f ~ ice• ,[ • 1r TO 1-36W b Tingdale- Valley View - Frontage Rd. Section Would be Removed\ rood Samerhan Grove i-11M - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■o. 1• S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i= ■ Colonial Way Park & Ride ■ Site will Replace +• ■ ■ ■tfl Good Samaritan Park & r sN,My. 9 Ride < Edina, Y i Additional Route from Crosstown on Tracy to ZONE 2 Benton $.1.60 9 0 O 3 PULL-OUT PULL -IN ROUTE: on LAYOVER POINT: * RELIEF POINT: R Lake st. Rta. 21, 94L NICOLLET 6ARAQE 22ND ST. ■ ■ t- 315TH ST. Minneapolis �� 36TN ST. H W J O v t15 N a Richfield Southdale Rta. 6, 16, 18, 28, 26, 78, 88, 69 ROUTE ZONE 1 $1.35 3FM A. eA o e 0 �. �y J•�N�bRPOM�bv• lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: GORDON HUGHES, ASSIST. MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: FEBRUARY 14, 1992 Subject: LOCAL REDISTRICTING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES Recommendation: Agenda Item # IX.A Consent Information Only L Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Info /Background: The attached Action Alert from LPIC reminds cities that March 30, 1992 is the deadline for city redistricting following the order issued by the special state redistricting panel on January 30 which provides for legislative districts based on Chapter 246, Laws of Minnesota 1991. Chapter 246 impacts the City of Edina in that Precinct 17 and Precinct 18 have been transferred to Representative Ron Erhardt's district from Representative Pauly's district. We have been working on the precinct boundaries for the City of Edina and will be prepared to present those to the Council for adoption at the meeting of March 2. Most precinctswill retain existing boundaries but I anticipate several changes to comply with current statutory requirements. State Statute does not require a statutory city that does not have wards to hold a public hearing on the redistricting plan and Edina has not done so in the past. However, the Council may wish to consider schedule a public hearing on March 2, 1992. i I .::,;ue :. innesow : ._:2s J� February 7, 1992 For further information contact: Ann Higgins TO: Mayors, Manager or Clerk FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director TIMELINE FOR LOCAL REDISTRICTING IN EFFECT March 30 Is Deadline For City Redistricting On Thursday, January 30, the special state redistricting panel signed an order entering its judgment establishing'the state court plan for legislative redistricting based on Chapter 246, originally approved by the '91 state legislature. * Cities are now required to redraw city ward and precinct boundaries within 60 days in compliance with M.S. 204B.135 and M.S. 204B.14. * Monday, March 30 is the deadline for cities to complete the local redistricting process. Court Plan Alters Some Legislative Districts Some cities have been affected by changes made by the court to the redistricting plan (Chapter 246) originally enacted by the '91 state legislature. Those cities should pay particular attention to obtain the following: * the most recent legal description of legislative district(s) encompassed within the city, which intersect city precinct and /or ward boundaries or which utilize city corporate limits; (State Redistricting Panel Final Order on Redistricting, C8 -91 -985, December 9, which became effective January 30); Counties have been advised to complete updated precinct tables by May 1, and to have updated precinct tinders ready by June 12, to make it possible to update voter records by the end of June (prior to the opening of filings for state legislative candidates). Attorney General Declares Legislature Has Been Redistricted The Attorney General has determined that the legislature has been redistricted and that the law requiring cities to be redistricted within 60 days was effective on the date on which the state court's order was signed (January 30). Chief Deputy Attorney General Jack Tunheim has notified county election officials that the legislature has been redistricted and that the state court plan has been established as the basis for implementing redistricting at the local level. Public Hearings On Redistricting Plans Cities should proceed as soon as possible to conduct public hearings as required by charter or ordinance and comply with requirements in M.S. 20413, to post notification of all precinct changes prior to the effective date of the change. Home rule charters frequently provide that public hearings are to be held when wards are redistricted. M.S. 205.84 requires statutory cities with wards to conduct hearings on proposed redistricting plans. Although this provision does not specifically apply to home rule charter cities, the League and the Secretary of State have advised cities to consider conducting hearings to encourage public comment on proposed redistricting plans. Even if the city intends to re- establish existing precinct and ward boundaries, that is a decision on which the public may wish to comment. The location of ward and /or precinct boundaries clearly affects voters' access to the election process and as well as the representation of neighborhoods and constituencies within the city. It would likely serve the city well in the future to go through the public hearing process at this point before adopting final redistricting plans so that there is an official record and recognition of the decisions reached by the council on these matters. Obtain Polling Locations And Inform County In addition, cities must identify and obtain appropriate locations for polling places and provide that information to counties so that counties can comply with requirements to update the precinct table by May 1, according to instructions issued last week by the Secretary of State. O b H REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # x . A . From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only Date: January 31, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To. HRA Subject: Executive Summaries ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Attached for your information are the Executive Summary Income and Expense Reports and Balance Sheets for the year ended December 31, 1991 for all the Enterprise Funds. The Balance Sheets are included for this period as they were last year at this time. None of the information included is audited or final. Info /Background The financial information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ART CENTER FUND Balance,Sheet ecember 31, 1991 Assets 1990 1991 Cash plus investments $ (41,706) $ (57,363) Receivables 5,607 5,757 Inventory 12,805 12,805 Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation 356,904 336,656 Total assets $ 333,610 $ 297,855 Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable $ 12,334 $ 7,355 Total Liabilities 12,334 7,355 Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service /Advance from other funds 50,750 50,750 Unreserved - undesignated 270,526 239,751 Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report $ 333,610 $ 297,855 December 31, 1991 Revenues $ 336,681 $ 254,739 Expenditures 252,737 261,503 Income before depreciation 83,944 (6,764) Depreciation expense 14,592 24,012 Net Income (Loss) $ 69,352 $ (30,776) 0 The financial information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POOLFUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Assets Cash plus investments Receivables Inventory Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable Total Liabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before depreciation Depreciation expense Net Income (Loss) 1990 1991 $ (103,968) $ (50,315) 0 0 .0 0 190,819 534,995 $ 86,851 $ 484,680 $ 4,702 $ 54,865 4,702 54,865 0 371,300 82,149 56,515 $ 86,851 $ 482,680 1990 1991 $ 105,572 $ 104,194 104,923 112,512 649 (8,318) 17,309 17,316 $ (16,660) $ (25,634) 0 The financial Information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOLF COURSE FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Assets Cash plus investments Receivables Bond Discount Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable Bonds payable Total Liabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before bond payments Bond payments Income before depreciation Depreciation expense -_- -- -- - Net Income (Loss) - 1990 1991 $ 1,355,684 $ 1,203,395 48,432 51,397 31,761 , 31,761 3,879,060 3,790,257 $ 5,314,937 $ 5,076,810 $ 104,777 $ 36,754 3,675,000 3,554,250 3,779,777. 3,591,004 421,579 427,587 1,113,581 1,058,219 $ 5,314,937 $ 5,076,810 1990 1991 $ 1,823,802 $ 1,785,460 1,220,496 1,319,077. 603,306 466,383 276,097 272,489 327,209 193,894 180,478 249,256 $ 1461731 -- $ _ - (55;362) - The financial information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ARENA FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Cash plus investments Receivables Bond Discount Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Assets 1990 1991 $ (815,839) $ (855,330) 57,461 60,515 21,135 21,135 2,022,323 '1,902,767 $ 1,285,080 $ 1,129,087 Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable Bonds payable Total Liabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before bond payments Bond payments Income before depreciation Depreciation expense Net Income (Loss) $ 19,289 $ 16,932 1,895,000 1,875,750 1,914,289 1,892,682 166,126 3,500 3,500 (632,789) (767,095) $ 1,285,000 $ 1,129,087 1990 1991 $ 716,980 $ 654,884 550,854 534,513 166,126 120,371 135,201 135,201 30,925 (14,830) 128,865 119,556 $ (97,940) $ (134,386) The financial Information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GUN RANGE FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Cash plus investments Receivables Inventory Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Accounts payable Assets 1990 1991 $ 1,401 $ 2,332 0 0 0 0 35,456 33,368 $ 36,857 $ 35,700 Liabilities & Retained Earnings Total Uabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Uabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before depreciation Depreciation expense Net Income (Loss) $ 1,081 $ 1,011 1,081 1,011 0 0 35,776 34,689 $ 36,857 $ 35,700 1990 1991 $ 29,118 $ 37,203 29,733 36,203 (615) 1,000 2,135 2,088 $ (2,750) $ (1,088) The financial Information Is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDINBOROUGH PARK / CENT. LAKES FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Assets Cash plus investments Receivables Inventory Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable Total Liabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before depreciation Depreciation expense Net Income (Loss) 1990 1991 $ (456,180) $ (739,591) 160,771 525,808 0 0 255,573 305,610 $ (39,836) $ 91,827 $ 23,383 $ 43,653 23,383 43,653 (62,497) 138,487 224,442 224,442 (287,661) (176,268) $ (39,836) $ 91,827 1990 1991 $ 749,937 $ 1,222,336 812,434 1,083,849 (62,497) 138,487 26,781 27,096 $ (89,278) $ 111,391 The financial information is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA UTILITIES FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Assets 1990 1991 Cash plus investments $ 2,323,919 $ 2,672,762 Receivables 1,138,039 958,149 Inventory - Water Meters 13,183 64,132 Bond Discount 0 25532 Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation 16,394,504 15,958,623 Total assets $ 19,869,645 $ 19,679,198 Liabilities & Retained Earnings Accounts payable $ 230,219 $ 133,066 Bonds payable 2,990,000 2,740,000 Total Liabilities 3,220,219 2,873,066 Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service 412,920 509,366 Unreserved - undesignated 16,236,506 16,296,766 Total Liabilities & Retained Earnings $ 19,869,645 $ 19,679,198 Income and Expense Report December 31, 1991 1990 1991 Revenues $ 5,136,376 $ 5,076,355 Expenditures 4,286,102 4,416,004 Income.before bond payments 850,274 660,351 Bond payments 194,382 185,120 Income before depreciation 655,892 475,231 Depreciation expense 414,056 414,972 Net Income (Loss) - - - - $ 241,836 $ 60,259 The financial Information Is not final 12/31/91 audited figures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA UQUOR FUND Balance Sheet December 31, 1991 Cash plus investments Receivables Inventory Property and Equipment, less Accumulated Depreciation Total assets Accounts payable Assets 1990 $ 10,241 $ 11,583 300,614 Uabilities & Retained Earnings Total Uabilities Retained Earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved - undesignated Total Uabilities & Retained Earnings Income and Expense Report December 31', 1991 Revenues Expenditures Income before depreciation Depreciation expense Net Income (Loss) 1991 345,223 5,322 425,557 639,879 638,795 $ 962,317 $ 1,414,897 $ 151,640 $ 190,000 151,640 190,000 0 0 810,677 1,224,897 $ 962,317 $ 1,414,897 1990 1991 $ 5,062,861 $ 5,494,335 4,787,662 5,041,817 275,199 452,518 38,786 38,298 $ 236,413 $ 414,220 1992 CITY OF EDINA 20.78- CHECK REGISTER WINE 01 -31 -92 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 007EII 02/12/92 4.71- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007EII 02/12/92 471.27 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 466.56 " MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 .22 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL " "" -CKS 007E26 02/12/92 297.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 103.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 898.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 4.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 510.36 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 1.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007E26 02/12/92 6.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL - 1,822.29 " " " " " "" " "" -CKS 007G82 02/12/92 18.67- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007G82 02/12/92 933.54 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 914.87 " " "" -CKS 007J62 02/12/92 4.94- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 11.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 1.30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 1.75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 3.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 173.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 129.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 494.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 24.79 24-78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 007J62 02/12/92 1,188.16 -1 f121 -.67 " JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 29002.94* " "" -CKS 007P82 02/12/92 16.62- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 007P82 02/12/92 567.46 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 550.84 " " "" -CKS 007Q16 02/12/92 20.78- QUALITY WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 .30 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 17.89- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 .22- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 .22 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 30.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 1,786.98 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 .00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 21.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 007Q16 02/12/92 21.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1,718.61 * ** -CKS 008D35 02/12/92 3,071.94 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE 10.- 4156 - 510-51 MANUAL 3,071.94 * * ** -CKS k * * R * 008F14 02/12/92 394.95 93.42 FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK FICA MEDICARE 10.- 4149 - 510 -51 1074162 - 510 -51 MANUAL MANUAL 008F14 02/12/92 488.37 * * ** -CKS R * R * * * 01OC47 02/12/92 430.10 COMM LIFE INS INSURANCE 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL 430.10 * * ** -CKS R * * * * R 01OP42 02/12/92 26,687.26 MEDICA INSURANCE 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 26,687.26 * * ** -CKS R * R R R * • 014E11 02/12/92 10.99- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014E11 02/12/92 .98- EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014E11 014E11 02/12/92 02/12/92 .30- 2.82- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 5073710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 014E11 014E11 02/,12/92, 02/12/92 6.33- 2.82- EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 014E11 02/12/92 .78- EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014EII 014E11 02/12/92 02/12/92 .93- 1,099.04 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014EII 014EII 02/12/92 02/12/92 29.65 282.30 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014EII 02/12/92 98.00 633.37 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014E11 014E11 02/12/92 02/12/92 78.05 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 014EII 014EII 02/12/92 02/12/92 281.85 92.98 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,569.29 * ** -CKS - 014E26 02/12/92 9.27- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 9.27 - 9.27- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 014E26 02/12/92 02/12/92 19.63- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014E26 014E26 02/12/92 02/12/92 8.63- 58.54- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 33.95- 2.57- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 014E26 02/12/92 02/12/92 981.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 2,926.85 ED PHILLIPS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 014E26 02/12/92 431.32 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 1,697.63 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 128.74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 249.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 754.60 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 114.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 400.68 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 .00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 .00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 510.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 911.10 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 338.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 144.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 .00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 784.23 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 663.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 014E26 02/12/92 1,075.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 11,732.92 " .. " ■.. " "" -CKS 014G82 02/12/92 49.64- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 108.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 41.75- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 81.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 19.76- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 2,481.94 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 2,087.61 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 5,441.69 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 4,092.46 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014G82 02/12/92 988.21 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862-86 MANUAL 14,790.08 " " ", " ■" """ -CKS 014J62 02/12/92 7.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 2.81- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 19.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 5.95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014362 02/12/92 9.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 83.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 6.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 1.31- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 31.69- JOHNSON.WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 5.07- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 11.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 10.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 3.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 8.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 64.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 978.83 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 10.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 1,584.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 4,177.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 26.37 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 014J62 02/12/92 16.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 21.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 3,243.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 562.69 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 5.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 8.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 745.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 593.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 280.80. JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 18.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 506.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 915.04 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 18.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 65.46 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 23.01 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 616.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 849.09 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 335.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 985.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 014J62 014J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 12.54 2.95 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 014J62 02/12/92 112.55- JOHNSON WINE 50. -4628-862-86 MANUAL 16,221.46 ...��. **A-CKS 014P20 02/12/92 19.90- PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014P20 02/12/92 5.60 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822-82 MANUAL 014P20 02/12/92 323.85 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 014P20 014P20 02/12/92 02/12/92 372.30 5.60 PAUSTIS PAUSTIS & SONS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 014P20 02/12/92 .00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 687.45 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 014P82 02/12/92 3.30- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 014P82 02/12/92 5.99- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014P82 02/12/92 6.66- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 014P82 02/12/92 301.75 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 014P82 02/12/92 599.49 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 014P82 02/12/92 666.04 PRIOR WINE 50 =4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1,551.33 * ** -CKS 014Q16 02/12/92 17.18- 61.97- QUALITY QUALITY WINE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 014Q16 014Q16 02/12/92 02/12/92 15.67- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 014Q16 02/12/92 57.80- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA �#`*Iklailem�# 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014Q16 02/12/92 014S05 02/12/92 014S05 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C33 02/12/92 017C33 02/12/92 R R R * * R 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 017C51 02/12/92 * * * * ** 021F14 02/12/92 021F14 02/12/92 * * * R * * * ** -CKS 021P32 02/12/92 021P32 02/12/92 * * * * * R 022EII 02/12/92 022EII 02/12/92 AMOUNT 39.32 - 18.94- 1.04- 3,098.45 2,891.13 1,965.89 1,717.51 1,559.69 103.00 1,892.85 13,016.60 2.00 118.00 120.00 141,000.00- 141,000.00 .00 26.12 403.80 2,743.93 533.49 61.84 705.74 81.06 1,326.96 11,670.83 24,844.98 22,770.05 65,168.80 16,038.28 4,331.77 20,370.05 19.62 30,148.12 30,167.74 " 5.85 - .91- CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE SALUD AMERICA SALUD AMERICA CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV MN DEPT /REV FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK P.E.R.A. P.E.R.A. EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE PAYROLL TRANSFER PAYROLL TRANSFER SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX FICA MEDICARE PERA PERA 01 -31 -92 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3357- 003 -00 * ** -CKS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 29- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 30- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 40- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357- 003 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * *" -CKS 10- 4145- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 022E11 02/12/92 5.01- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022EII 02/12/92 .93- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 022EII 02/12/92 2.52- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 5.02- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 91.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 584.52 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 500.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 93.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022EII 02/12/92 501.79 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022E11 02/12/92 252.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,003.47 " ■ "..." """ -CKS 022E26 02/12/92 1.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 6.10- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 12.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 1.79- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 11.44- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 70.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 305.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 631.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 572.17 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 89.36 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 53.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 533.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 187.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 743.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 236.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 187.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 1,123.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 464.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 117.90 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 842-84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 53.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 53.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 187.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 187.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 323.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 1,275.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022E26 02/12/92 1,400.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 8,761.72 " " " " " "" """ -CKS 022G82 02/12/92 76.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 2.13- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 153.35- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 77.12- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 3,844.42 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 106.27 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 7,667.43 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022G82 02/12/92 3,855.87 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 15,164.50 " " " " ■.* . ", -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 022J62 02/12/92 2.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 .52- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 22.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 7.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 48.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2.04- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2.99- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 87.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 59.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 10.95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 10.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 5.72- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 7.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 44.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 5.72- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 53.49- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 5.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 17.11 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2,412.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1,126.58 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 5.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 4,378.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 28.62 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022362 02/12/92 2,989.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2,221.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2,673.56 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 13.57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 18.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 291.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 51.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 10.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 724.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 178.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 28.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 11.21 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1,094.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 204.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 299.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1,046.09 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 19.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 785.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 571.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 579.37- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 022J62 02/12/92 579.37 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA 50- 3710 - 842 -84 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 022J62 02/12/92 102.20 JOHNSON WINE * ** -CKS 20,979.05 MANUAL k k k k k k MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 022P82 02/12/92 5.74- PRIOR WINE 022P82 02/12/92 4.67- PRIOR WINE 022P82 02/12/92 8.29- PRIOR WINE 022P82 02/12/92 573.85 PRIOR WINE 022P82 02/12/92 467.40 PRIOR WINE 022P82 02/12/92 828.94 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,851.49 MANUAL k k k k k k MANUAL * ** -CKS 022Q16 02/12/92 9.75- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 3.42- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 20.74- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 19.15- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 60.27- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 1.29- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 14.55- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 .47- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 41.03- QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 1,036.58 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 3,013.48 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 64.07 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 2,052.16 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 972.94 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 342.00 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 1,908.90 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 1,451.24 QUALITY WINE 022Q16 02/12/92 46.95 QUALITY WINE 10,717.65 kkkkkk 022S05 02/12/92 2.00 SALUD AMERICA 022S05 02/12/92 58.00 SALUD AMERICA 022S05 02/12/92 2.00 SALUD AMERICA 022S05 02/12/92 58.00 SALUD AMERICA 120.00 kkkkkk 022T22 02/12/92 128.00 THE WINE COMPANY 128.00 * k k k k k k 022W89 02/12/92 64.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 64.00 * kkkkkk 028E11 02/12/92 4.06- EAGLE WINE 01 -31 -92 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.. # MESSAGE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA 4.16- ED PHILLIPS CHECK REGISTER MANUAL 01 -31 -92 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. & MESSAGE 028E11 02/12/92 21- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 028EII 02/12/92 2.80 -. EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028EII 02/12/92 .97- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 9.44- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 028EII 02/12/92 .91- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 .1.55- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 028EII 02/12/92 2.00- EAGLE WINE : 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 20.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 279.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 405.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 97.45 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 =84 MANUAL 028EII 02/12/92 91.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028EII 02/12/92 943.74 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 199.55 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E11 02/12/92 154.75 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,170.90 .■...■ * **-CKS 028E26 02/12/92 4.16- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 3.41 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 16.06- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 8.74 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 A.80- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 208.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 170.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 803.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 240.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 436.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 499.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 866.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 671.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 598.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL 028E26. 02/12/92 394.55 ED PHILLIPS . 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 240.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 380.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 382.53 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028E26 02/12/92 775.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,631.18 i **. -CKS 028G82 02/12/92 21.68- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 16.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 21.37- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 105.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 82.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 4.64- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86_ MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 1,068.74 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 5,291.90 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 231.80 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 4,100.04 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 028G82 02/12/92 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,440.95 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE �.. ■� . * * -CKS 028J62 02/12/92 8.63- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 14.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 6.18- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 6.32- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 44.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 7.73- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.39- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 29.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 7.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 3.09- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 .97- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 25.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 65.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 8.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.14- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 5.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 309.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 707:96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 028J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 4.72 431.68 JOHNSON -WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 1,455.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 20.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 6.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 386.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4526- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 2,205.20 JOHNSON WINE. 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 3,292.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 430.08 17.41 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4626- 862 786 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 028J62 028J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 1,295.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 154.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 10.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 547.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 578.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82. MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 12.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 7.60- JOHNSON -WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 499.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 630.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842, -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12192 7.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 15.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028J62 028J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 537.48 7.67 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 512.69 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 96.70 JOHNSON-WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 7.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 028J62 02/12/92 702.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 028362 028J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 1.18 17.70 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA 2.39- PRIOR WINE CHECK REGISTER MANUAL 01 -31 -92 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 02/12/92 4.56- 14,656.58 " 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 "* " " "" PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 * ** -CKS 028P20 02/12/92 113.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 58.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 11.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 42.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 532.05 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028P20 02/12/92 1.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 763.55 * 02/12/92 .59 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 028P82 02/12/92 2.39- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 8.58- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 4.56- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 238.65 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 857.65 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028P82 02/12/92 456.34 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1,537.11 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 028Q16 02/12/92 14.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 2.28- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 12.95- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 31.26- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 .09 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 .59 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 10.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 2.05 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 1.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 8.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028Q16 .02/12/92 47.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 028016 02/12/92 735.21 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 1,561.88 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 2,385.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 228.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 1,292.32 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 1,033.15 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 58.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 205.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 4.47- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 873.49 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 028Q16 02/12/92 140.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7,855.83 " A**-CKS 028505 02/12/92 5.10 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028S05 02/12/92 435.90- SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028S05 02/12/92 5.10 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 028505 02/12/92 435.90 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. i MESSAGE CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT • VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 028S05 02/12/92 5.10- SALUD AMERICA 028S05 02/12/92 436.00 SALUD AMERICA 028S05 02/12/92 2.55 SALUD AMERICA 028S05 02/12/92 189.00 SALUD'AMERICA 10- 4157 - 510-51 MANUAL 632.65 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * * * * ** 028T22 02/12/92 35.16 THE WINE COMPANY 35.16 * *RR ** 01 -31 -92 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. i MESSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84 031C33 02/12/92 13,500.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 031C33 02/12/92 13,500.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 031C33 02/12/92 135,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 031C33 02/12/92 135,000:00 -* CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4157 - 510-51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL 031C47 02/12/92 430.10 COMM LIFE INS INSURANCE 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 430.10 * * ** -CKS 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 031D35 02%12/92 2,890.60 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862-86 2,890.60 * 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** * ** MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 031G86 02/12/92 17,289.20 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 17,289.20 * * * * * ** 031M24 02/12/92 21,088.95 MEDCENTER INSURANCE 21,088.95 * * * * * ** 031N12 02/12/92 1,760.52 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 1,760.52 * * * * * ** 036E11 02/12/92 15.20- EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 2.92- EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 3.90- EAGLE WINE 036EII 02/12/92 1.53- EAGLE WINE 036EII 02/12/92 5.17- EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 5.64- EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 1.12- EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 292.35 EAGLE WINE 036E11 02/12/92 1,519.76 EAGLE WINE 01 -31 -92 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. i MESSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4157 - 510-51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 036EII 02/12/92 389.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 036EII 02/12/92 152.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 036E11 02/12/92 112.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 036EII 02/12/92 516.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 036EII 02/12/92 564.44 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 3,512.27 RRRRRR 036E26 02/12/92 1.36- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036E26 02/12/92 13.18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 1.74- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 67.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 036E26 02/12/92 224.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 036E26 02/12/92 658.81 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 87.21 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 996.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 036E26 02/12/92 1,540.56 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 036E26 02/12/92 1,400.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 036E26 02/12/92 794.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 036E26 02/12/92 692.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 036E26 02/12/92 603.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 036E26 02/12/92 317.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 1,110.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 036E26 02/12/92 868.23 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 9,346.03 " * * * * ** 036G82 02/12/92 34.06- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036G82 02/12/92 85.12- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 036G82 02/12/92 51.28- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 036G82 02/12/92 2.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 036G82 02/12/92 1,702.82 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 036G82 02/12/92 4,256.07 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 036G82 02/12/92 144.33 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 036G82 02/12/92 2,563.99 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 8,493.86 RRRRRR 036J62 02/12/92 4.70- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 4.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 8.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 37.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 43.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 14.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 036J62 02/12/92 5.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 036J62 02/12/92 83.34- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 036J62 02/12/92 21.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 036J62 02/12/92 9.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 036J62 02/12/92 9.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 036J62 02/12/92 38.72- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 036J62 02/12/92 10.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 036J62 02/12/92 35.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 01 -31 -92 PAGE 13 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. *.P.O. A MESSAGE 036362 02/12/92 .84- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 7.50- 13.28- JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50 =3710- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 14.16 12.98 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 231.90 1,894.74 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 5074626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 2,164.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 .11.21 22.92 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 4167.29 1,,093.02 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 5074626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 12.39 14.75 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 1,793.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4626 - 862 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 1,935.92 471.19 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 815.69 11.80 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 1,428.19 18.88 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628- 822-82 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 922.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 12.39 23.01 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 516.49 •4.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 958.27 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 961.84 1.18 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 750.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 036362 02/12/92 663.99 18.88 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 036J62 036J62 02/12/92 02/12/92 84.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 036J62 02/12/92 13.57 JOHNSON WINE 20,705.60 " *ra -CKS 036P20 02/12/92 10.95- 5.00 PAUSTIS PAUSTIS & SONS & SONS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036P20 036P20 02/12/92 02/12/92 275.75 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036P20 02/12/92 .00 4.00 PAUSTIS PAUSTIS & SONS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 036P20 036P20 02/12/92 02/12/92 245.30 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 519.10 *A* -CKS xs..� 036P82 02/12/92 10.11- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 036P82 036P82 02/12/92 02/12/92 .60- 9.31- PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 036P82 02/12/92 9.68- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 036P82 02/12/92 1,011.29 PRIOR WINE 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. # MESSAGE 036P82 02/12/92 60.00 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 036P82 02/12/92 930.87 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 136P82 02/12/92 968.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 2,940.86 " ■ ■ ■�.� . *■ -CKS 036Q16 02/12/92 33.04- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1.24- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 20.31- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 2.86- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1.66 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 10.07- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 036016 02/12/92 2.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 38.68- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 3.18 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 36.65- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 14.61- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 142.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1,015.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1,934.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1,833.14 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 124.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 82.94- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 3,298.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1,006.23 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 248.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 318.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 036Q16 02/12/92 1,458.52 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,504.86 " . *. .k*■ ***-CKS 036S05 02/12/92 252.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 036S05 02/12/92 2.55 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 254.55 " .� ■� r.. -CKS 03ST22 02/12/92 64.00 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 036T22 02/12/92 .90 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 64.90 " ..:�.� ***-CKS 036W89 02/12/92 5.10 WORLD CLASS WINES 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036W89 02/12/92 498.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 036W89 02/12/92 133.02 WORLD CLASS WINES 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 636.12 " . ■.�.. k*. -CKS 124,700.95 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 403.80 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 2,743.93 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 533.49 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK i REGISTER 01 -31 -92 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE 61.84 FUND-29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 786.80 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,326.96. FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 288,943..04 - , _�84;- -N FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 419,500.81* 41e -600.8 e IOTA L j i i i r 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 048630 02/10/92 R R R R R R 048G01 02/06/92 048G01 02/06/92 048G01 02/06/92 048G01 02/06/92 048G01 02/06/92 048601 02/06/92 RRRRRR 048R21 02/06/92 R R R :g*; 000 02/04/92 049700 02/06/92 049701 02/04/92 049702 02/04/92 049703 02/04/92 049704 02/04/92 049705 02/04/92 049706 02/04/92 049707 02/04/92 049708 02/04/92 049709 02/04/92 049710 02/04/92 049711 02/04/92 AMOUNT 24.75 24.75 638.43 256.00 283.60 223.60 92.80 322.45 1,816.88 " 119.85 119.85 " 113.64 356.05 469.69 * 103.95 103.95 * 232.50 232.50 * 25.25 25.25 * 290.50 290.50 * 159.00 159.00 * 49.88 49.88 * 2.96 2.96 * 352.25 352.25 * 900.00 900.00 * 11.00 11.00 * 1,386.67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES RED WING SHOES STEPHEN MARSTON STEPHEN MARSTON JEFF LONG HELICOPTER FLIGHT RAY BENSON HANCO CORP MARCH DIST DIMENSIONS LTD MOTOTRONICS INC HALL SIGNS INC WEST SUNURBAN BRUCE GATES TIMOTHY J CRIMMINS 02 -18 -92 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 749742 9127 LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 301 -30 LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 560 -56 LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 646 -64 LAUNDRY 10- 4512- 540 -54 LAUNDRY 28- 4262- 702 -70 LAUNDRY 40- 4262- 801 -80 SHOES 10- 4642- 560 -56 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE REIMBURSEMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES REFUND PARTS MANUALS TOOLS PARTS SIGNS HUMAN SERVICES COMM END LICENSE SERVICES 10 -4266- 420 -42 10- 4901 - 420 -42 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4504- 643 -64 301002 9070 40- 3800 - 000 -00 10- 4620 - 560 -56 403394 8621 10- 4504 - 560 -56 8707 40- 4580- 801 -80 67034 8635 10- 4504 - 322-30 9495 8423 10- 4542- 325 -30 85992 8686 10- 4201- 504 -50 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4201 - 440 -44 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049712 049713 049714 049715 049716 049717 049718 049719 049720 049721 049722 049723 049724 049725 049726 049727 049728 049729 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 02/04/92 AMOUNT 1,386.67 * 43.50 43.50 * 39.15 39.15 * 52.06 52.06 * 48.88 48.88 * 51.00 51.00 * 65.88 65.88 * 21.25 21.25 * 11,955.25 11,955.25 * 2,000.00 2,000.00 * 99.95 99.95 * 155.00 155.00 * 152.25 152.25 * 2,000.00 2,000.00 21.50 21.50 " 22.75 22.75 22.75 22.75 21.50 21.50 * 11.00 11.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION VERNON BURNS LAWRENCE ANDERSON KEVIN WINTERS TRENT WRIGHT CHERYL VASKE STEVE BOT NEIL KUEPKE SPAULDING UNITED BATTERED GEORGIA PROVO STATE FARM FIRE LARSCO INC ROUSE MECH INC PETERSON PORTRAITS. WM C HANSEN RICHARD MYRE RICHARD HELMER JOHN MALONEY SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICE SERVICE RANGE BALLS HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE REFUND REPAIR PARTS NEW GAS LINE PRINTS CONT ED CONT ED CONT ED COMM EDN LICENSE 02 -18 -92 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4120 - 667 -66 27- 4636 - 666 -66 ED6129 7362 10- 4201 - 504 -50 10- 4504 - 500 -50 10- 3180 - 000 -00 40- 4540 - 801 -80 9080 26- 1300 - 000 -00 9347 10- 4504 - 100 -10 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4310- 440 -44 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049730 02/04/92 546.45 IND FLOOR MAINT REPAIR PARTS 546.45 * 049731 02/04/92 4,490.00 CASE POWER EQUIP SNOW BLOWER 4,490.00 * 049732 02/04/92 591.81 J -CRAFT INC REPAIRS 591.81 * 049733 02/06/92 164.00 MN STATE BOARD ELECTRICAL PERMIT 164.00 * 049734 02/04/92 100.00 MN ASSOC OF DUES 100.00 * 049735 02/04/92 198.00 DIANE DEMOSS SERVICES 198.00 * 049736 02/06/92 213.00 ROCKET CRANE CRANE SERVICE 213.00 * 049737 02/06/92 100.00 DAVID MALMBERG PERFORM 3/19/92 100.00 * 049738 02/06/92 100.00 MOLLY 0 BRAIN PERFORM 2/22/92 100.00 * 049739 02/06/92 85.00 BRAIN RICHARDS PERFORM 4/23/92 85.00 * 049740 02/06/92 175.00 JAMES WEDGWOOD PERFORM 3/15/92 175.00 * 049741 02/06/92 350.00 ROBIN GREER SERVICES 350.00 * 049742 02/06/92 346.14 JOHN MADSON SERVICES 346.14 * 049743 02/06/92 12.32 RITZ CAMERA PHOT SUPPLIES 049743 02/06/92 177.66 RITZ CAMERA FILM 189.98 * 049744 02/06/92' 200.00 SOUND PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 * 049745 02/06/92 60.00 CHERI ANDERSON PERFORM 3/5/92 60.00 * 049746 02/06/92 11.00 PATRICK RUNNING COMM END LICENSE 11.00 * 049747 02/06/92 20.25 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES DIRECTORY 20.25 * 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540- 560 -56 6833 8849 10- 4901 - 305 -30 16495 8111 10- 4248 - 560 -56 11726 8499 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4204 - 200 -20 10- 4201 - 600 -60 30- 4288 - 782 -78 C56287 9203 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 784 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4508- 420 -42 37430 30- 4504 - 781 -78 375956 9201 30- 4504- 784 -78 07867 9199 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4204 - 140 -14 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049748 02/06/92 049749 02/06/92 049750 02/06/92 049751 02/06/92 049752 02/06/92 049752 02/06/92 049753 02/06/92 049754 02/06/92 049755 02/06/92 049756 02/06/92 049757 02/06/92 049758 02/06/92 049759 02/06/92 049760 02/06/92 049761 02/06/92 049761 02/10/92 049762 02/06/92 049763 02/06/92 049764 02/06/92 049765 02/06/92 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 647 -64 9139 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4310- 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4560- 644 -64 10- 4504 - 560 -56 27- 4504 - 664 -66 8065 8881 10- 4318 - 280 -28 8671 8945 10- 4540- 540 -54 8944 27- 4504- 385 -30 10833 8948 10- 4540 - 322 -30 8035 30- 4540- 784 -78 85133 30- 4540 - 784 -78 84940 8639 10- 4504 - 100 -10 8715 10- 4280 - 504 -50 10- 4201 - 504 -50 10- 4290 - 510 -51 4 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 3,900.00 SHERBURN PAINT SERVICES 3,900.00 " 13.87 JOHN MALONEY CONT ED 13.87 " 11.00 ANDREW MEDZIS COMM EDN LICENSE 11.00 * 25.00 FMAM REGISTRATION 25.00 13.69 WM E LUTTS CONT ED 11.00 WM E LUTTS COMM END LICENSE 24.69 " 11.00 GREGORY SMEGAL COMM END LICENSE 11.00 136.00 DIVISION OF TREES 136.00 " 96.00 STATE OF MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.00 " 478.98 ACCUFORM GOLF LTD GENERAL SUPPLIES 478.98 80.00 NYHLIN FILTER RECY OIL FILTERS 80.00 98.09 COFFEE INN REPAIR PARTS 98.09 " 31.10 BEAR COMM GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.10 260.61 GE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 260.61 " 49.66 NOVAKS GARAGE REPAIR PARTS 634.62 NOVAKS GARAGE REPAIR PARTS 684.28 * 174.00 MILLER DAVIS GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.00 * 200.00 ABC FOUNDATION CULTURAL EXPO 200.00 " 5,400.00 SR COMM SERV HUMAN SERVICES 5,400.00 * 5,000.00 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 647 -64 9139 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4310- 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 4560- 644 -64 10- 4504 - 560 -56 27- 4504 - 664 -66 8065 8881 10- 4318 - 280 -28 8671 8945 10- 4540- 540 -54 8944 27- 4504- 385 -30 10833 8948 10- 4540 - 322 -30 8035 30- 4540- 784 -78 85133 30- 4540 - 784 -78 84940 8639 10- 4504 - 100 -10 8715 10- 4280 - 504 -50 10- 4201 - 504 -50 10- 4290 - 510 -51 4 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE 5,000.00 * 049766 02/06/92 51.60 HENN CTY TREAS SERVICE CHARGE 66- 2010 - 000 -00 44720 51.60 * 049767 02/06/92 225.00 TOM WASSMUND REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 01008 225.00 * 049768 02/06/92 100.00 METRO /MN CHAPTER DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 100.00 * 049769 02/06/92 215.00 SOKKIA MEAS SYST GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 100204 8396 215.00 * 049770 02/06/92 218.19 NASCO SAMPLE BAGS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 91474 8493 218.19 * 049771 02/06/92 103.37 GRAND STAGE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504- 434 -43 76182 8666 103.37 * 049772 02/06/92 119.75 HCMC BOOKS /PAMPHLETS 10- 4502 - 420 -42 119.75 * 049773 02/06/92 153.17 MPH INDUSTRIES EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 C39336 153.17 * 049774 02/06/92 30.00 SCOTT THOMPSON CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 30.00 * 049775 02/06/92 18.96 MICHAEL SIITARI CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 18.96 * 049776 02/06/92 295.40 DAVID CARLSON CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 295.40 * 049777 02/06/92 75.00 JEAN NORLING REFUND 10- 3184 - 000 -00 75.00 * 049778 02/06/92 26.50 SCOTT KUYPER CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 26.50 * 049779 02/06/92 27.35 STEVE STROH CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 049779 02/06/92 21.99 STEVE STROH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 49.34 * 049780 02/06/92 27.46 THOMAS MASON CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 27.46 * 049781 02/06/92 17.00 PHILIP LARSEN CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 17.00 * 049782 02/06/92 3,705.48 HENN CTY TREAS WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286- 220 -22 489 3,705.48 * 049783 02/06/92 30.00 RICHARD CAMPBELL CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 30.00 * 049784 02/06/92 225.00 ERIK AMUNDSON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 225.00 049785 02/06/92 165.96 RON MUNDALE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 165.96 * 049786 02/06/92 98.00 ROBERT BUIE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 98.00 * 049787 02/06/92 125.00 MICHAEL SNYDER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 125.00 049788 02/10/92 94.97 CARL W SHANNON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 94.97 * 049789 02/10/92 288.00 HOIGAARDS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 221116 8563 288.00 * 049790 02/10/92 93.25 LJ RUBBER STAMP STAMPS 10- 4516- 440 -44 27714 8565 93.25 * 049791 02/10/92 162.48 DOUGLAS BAGLEY REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4206 - 440 -44 162.48 * 049792 02/10/92 3,207.06 TRUSTEE MUSIC SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 3 , 207-. 06 * 049793 02/10/92 65.00 NATL ASSOC OF DUES 12- 4204 - 434 -43 65.00 * 049794 02/10/92 75.00 -ROBERT BURTIS 3/12/92 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 * 049795 02/10/92 50.00 TC SWEET ADELINES 3/10/92 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 049796 02/10/92 85.00 BRUCE MENIER BELL SERV 3/24/92 30- 4224 - 781 -78 85.00 * 049797 02/10/92 37.50 ODEGARD BOOKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 02517 37.50 * 049798 02/10/92 3,300.00 STS CONSULT LTD PRO ENG SERV 60- 1300 - 298 -04 623759 3,300.00 * 049799 02/10/92 78.83 WACO RENTAL 30- 4504 - 782 -78 529864 78.83 * 049800 02/10/92 29.50 TUREK FARM EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 784 -78 59140 29.50 * 049801 02/10/92 102.62 SCHAFF PIANO SUPP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 331725 8987 102.62 * 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049802 02/10/92 20.00 MRPA SEMINAR 20.00 * 049803 02/10/92 91.09 AMSTERDAM OFFICE SUPPLIES 91.09 * 049804 02/10/92 162.00 C 6 S A CLAIMS AMBULANCE REFUND 162.00 * 049805 02/10/92 48.00 DM OR MARILYN AMBULANCE REFUND 48.00 * 049806 02/10/92 126.00 ARROWWOOD CONT ED /R LUTZ 126.00 * 049807 02/10/92 180.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE 049807 02/10/92 150.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE 330.00 * 049808 02/10/92 496.87 STANDARD FUSEE CORP SAFETY EQUIP 496.87 * 049809 02/10/92 470.50 LYNN PEAVEY CORP SAFETY EQUIP 470.50 049810 02/10/92 17.75 WM BARINGTON CONT ED 17.75 * 049811 02/10/92 220.00 MICROFACS INC FAX SVC CONTRACT 220.00 * 049812 02/10192 2,337.00 C 0 FIELD CO CONSTRUCTION 2,337.00 * 049813 02/10/92 498.16 CHEM CONCEPT GENERAL SUPPLIES 498.16 * 049814 02/10/92 67.45 LERN SERVICES 67.45 * 049815 02/10/92 15.00 POKORNY COMP REPAIR PARTS 15.00 * 049816 02/10/92 300.00 S I R MILES INC CONT ED 300.00 * 049817 02/10/92 70.00 MTI DIST CO CONT ED 70.00 * 049818 02/10/92 150.00 MTI DIST CO CONT ED 150.00 * 049819 02/10/92 22.31 DAN DUFRESNE TEMP BALL PICKER 22.31 * 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A MESSAGE 30- 4202 - 781 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 4202 - 420 -42 103919 8661 10- 4268- 420 -42 1Q4170 10- 4268 - 420 -42 1Q4169 10- 4642 - 420 -42 8883 10- 4642 - 420 -42 60073 9121 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4288 - 510 -51 6784 60- 1300 - 013 -20 30- 4504 - 784 -78 0507 9226 30- 4204 - 781 -78 10- 4540 - 646 -64 12529 8519 26- 4202 - 681 -68 10- 4202 - 640 -64 10- 4202 - 640 -64 27- 4120- 667 -66 7 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049820 02/10/92 049821 02/10/92 049821 02/10/92 049822 02/10/92 049823 02/10/92 049824 02/10/92 049825 02/10/92 049826 02/10/92 049826 02/10/92 049826 02/10/92 049827 02/11/92 049828 02/11/92 049829 02/11/92 049830 02/11/92 049831 02/11/92 049832 02/11/92 049833 02/11/92 049834 02/11/92 049835 02/11/92 049836 02/11/92 049837 02/11/92 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 644 -64 2992 9102 27- 4504 - 667 -66 8924 8886 27- 4504 - 667 -66 8931 9280 10- 4202 - 420 -42 45945 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504- 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4248 - 520 -52 4107 30- 4504- 783 -78 25044 7672 30- 4504 - 782 -78 9286\ 30- 4504 - 781 -78 C03869 25- 1139- 000 -00 8304 10- 4288 - 510 -51 259772 6142 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201- 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 611 -61 23- 3500- 000 -00 8 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 327.90 TC SAW /SVC CO FORESTRY PARTS 327.90 * 126.00 BRENT SIGNS SIGN 35.30 BRENT SIGNS SIGN 161.30 * 388.00 LETN CONT ED 388.00 * 30.24 JIM FISCHER CONT ED 30.24 * 120.00 CSC CREDIT SVC PRO SERVICES 120.00 * 59.02 JOY MALTBY CONT ED 59.02 * 280.00 FINE MGMT OF MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.00 FINE MGMT OF MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.00- FINE MGMT OF MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.00 * 240.00 PRO CARPET /UPHOLSTRY CARPET CLEAN /PD 240.00 * 313.00 PRO -TEC DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES 313.00 * 132.00 CO SINES GENERAL SUPPLIES 132.00 * 33.40 FAST 1 HR FOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.40 * 655.85 MACHOVES FOOD MKT WATER RESCUE EQUIP 655.85 * 307.00 AMERIDATA SERVICE CONTRACT 307.00 105.00 DANNY MACKERMAN AC INSTRUCTOR 105.00 * 180.00 ROSE EDIN SC INSTRUCTOR 180.00 * 125.00 PHYLLIS PETERSON AC INSTRUCTOR 125.00 * 86.00 JANE SCHMECHEL PT AC OFFICE ADM 86.00 * 26.00 DAVID CANILLAS CLASS REFUND 02 -18 -92 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 644 -64 2992 9102 27- 4504 - 667 -66 8924 8886 27- 4504 - 667 -66 8931 9280 10- 4202 - 420 -42 45945 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504- 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4248 - 520 -52 4107 30- 4504- 783 -78 25044 7672 30- 4504 - 782 -78 9286\ 30- 4504 - 781 -78 C03869 25- 1139- 000 -00 8304 10- 4288 - 510 -51 259772 6142 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201- 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 611 -61 23- 3500- 000 -00 8 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 26.00 * 049838 02/11/92 14.00 CONNIE SHARP CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 14.00 * 049839 02/11/92 170.00 GLORIA HAGLUND CLASS REFUND 23- 3500- 000 -00 170.00 * 049840 02/11/92 32.00 DEBRA WEBER CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 32.00 * 049841 02/11/92 18.00 RENEE NELSON CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 18.00 * 049842 02/11/92 16.00 KEN ANDERSON CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 16.00 * 049843 02/11/92 10.00 HENN CTY FIRE DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10.00 * 049844 02/11/92 180.00 BROOKLYN PRK CONT ED 10- 4202 - 281 -28 180.00 * *R * * ** * ** -CKS 049846 02/11/92 210.00 EXCEL INTERIORS REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 30523 9230 210.00 * 049847 02/11/92 24,883.88 GL CONTRACTING PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 24,883.88 * 049848 02/11/92 198,635.44 GRIDOR CONSTR CO PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 198,635.44 * 049849 02/11/92 600.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH CERT FEE 10- 4204 - 482 -48 600.00 * 049850 02/11/92 209.81 COLOR ADVANTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504- 434 -43 11942 209.81 * 049851 02/11/92 15,826.00 LESTER BLDG SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION 27 -1300- 006 -00 162 15,826.00 * * * *R *R * ** -CKS 049A01 02/05/92 590.30 e 3M CO LETTERS /NUMBERS 10- 4542- 325 -30 8337 590.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049A03 02/10/92 107.76 A -Z RENTAL REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 669 -66 7915 049A03 02/10/92 62.31 A -Z RENTAL REPAIRS 27- 4540- 669 -66 92329 7846 170.07 * R * * * ** * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049A09 02/11/92 049A09 02/10/92 049A09, 02/06/92 049A09 02/06/92 049A09 02/04/92 RfIR R *t 10- 4250 - 540 -54 049A39 02/04/92 049A39 02/06/92 049A39 02/04/92 049A39 02/06/92 50.4262- 841 -84 AAGARD 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/11/92 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/10/92 049A49 02/10/92 * * * * ** 2774250 - 667 -66 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02106/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 049A54 02/06/92 * * * * ** 049A76 02/06/92 049A76 02/11/92 AMOUNT - 5.50 2,422.03 63.64 25.50 1,312.50 3,829.17 57.19 91.60 65.00 474.75 688.54 " 148.31 11.70 127.34 36.39 322.75 57.76 61.59 47.00 812.84 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION AAA FILING FEE AAA LICENSE AAA FILING FEE AAA DUP PLATE AAA LICENSE TABS ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS STARTER TOOLS LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 02 -18 -92 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV: A P.O. * MESSAGE 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4310 - 560 -58 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 560 -56 7298 8785 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16033 8847 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16576 8782 40- 4580 - 801 - 80.7357 8927 10- 4262- 440 -44 AAGARD 1074262- 482 -48 10- 4250 - 540 -54 10- 4262 - 520 -52 AAGARD 27- 4512- 663 -66 9027 30 =4262- 782 -78 AAGARD 50. 4262- 821 -82 23- 4250- 312 -61 50.4262- 841 -84 AAGARD 50r 4262 - 861 -86 23- 4250 - 312 -61 348.52 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250- 301 -30 135.81 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 348.51 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 108.64 AAGARD GARBAGE 10- 4254 - 440 -44 54.33- AAGARD GARBAGE 23- 4250- 312 -61 54.33 AAGARD GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 312 -61 54.33 AAGARD GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 217.29 AAGARD GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 662 -66 81.25 AAGARD GARBAGE 27;4250- 664 -66 53.94 AAGARD GARBAGE 2774250 - 667 -66 379.66 AAGARD GARBAGE 28- 4250 - 702 -70 430.24 AAGARD GARBAGE 30- 4250 - 782 -78 36.75 AAGARD GARBAGE 50 =4250- 821 -82 :63.91 AAGARD GARBAGE 50- 4250- 841 -84 159.22 AAGARD GARBAGE 507-4250- 861 -86 2,418.07 279.35 ASPLUND COFFEE 383.55 ASPLUND COFFEE 662.90 " COST /GOODS SOLD COST /GOODS SOLD 049A83 02/06/92 79.00 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 28- 4624- 703 -70 34586 9026 28- 4624- 703 -70 35041' 9145 10- 4256 - 510 -51 * *" -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049A83 02/11/92 049A83 02/06/92 049A84 02/06/92 RRRRRR TELEPHONE 049813 02/06/92 049814 02/06/92 049814 02/04/92 049814 02/04/92 049614 02/06/92 R R R R R R PRO ENG SERV 049618 02/06/92 049618 02/06/92 R R R R R R 049822 02/11/92 049822 02/11/92 049B22 02/10/92 049622 02/06/92 049622 02/10/92 049822 02/10/92 049822 02/06/92 049822 02/10/92 RRRRRR 359.49 049825 02/04/92 RRRRRR 10- 4100 - 430 -42 049827 02/10/92 049B27 02/10/92 049827 02/10/92 049827 02/10/92 049827 02/10/92 R R R R R R 049630 02/04/92 049B30 02/04/92 049B30 02/04/92 02 -18 -92 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 23- 4256- 612 -61 10- 4256 - 622 -62 41- 4201 - 900 -90 10- 4540- 560 -56 106140 8928 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103782 8781 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103888 8784 10- 4540 - 560 -56 105422 8840 10- 4540- 560 -56 159549 8786 10- 4620- 560 -56 159336 8792 150.40 CHECK REGISTER BEER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 9.90 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 28.89 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 117.79 * 50- 4630- 822 -82 19.80 AT &T CONS PROD DIV TELEPHONE 19.80 * 50- 4630 - 842 -84 905.60 631.42 BARR ENG PRO ENG SERV 631.42 " 30.50 BEER WHOLESALERS 25.11 BOYER TRUCKS LAMP 326.16 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 86.76 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 92.76 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 530.79 " 3,168.50 153.54 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 359.49 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 513.03 * 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " 02 -18 -92 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 23- 4256- 612 -61 10- 4256 - 622 -62 41- 4201 - 900 -90 10- 4540- 560 -56 106140 8928 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103782 8781 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103888 8784 10- 4540 - 560 -56 105422 8840 10- 4540- 560 -56 159549 8786 10- 4620- 560 -56 159336 8792 150.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630- 663 -66 68.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 667 -66 1,047.95 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 775.55 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 905.60 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 30.50 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 122.10 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 68.00 BEER WHOLESALERS MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 3,168.50 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 " 193.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50 =4626- 822 -82 194.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 842 -84 194.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 862 -86 194.50- BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERSY 50- 4626- 862 -86 194.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERSY 50- 4626- 862 -86 582.00 " 41.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 749279 26.18 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 748759 21.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 748771 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * "" -CKS RRR -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 8 MESSAGE 049830 02/04/92 43.65 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 748829 049630 02/04/92 4.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 748759 049630 02/10/92 85.54 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 750612 049630 02/11/92 5.82 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 751778 049630 02/04/92 117.90 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 748759 049830 02/04/92 1.69 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 600 -60 748759 049630 02/10/92 60.24 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 751123 049630 02/06/92 11.59- BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT 28- 4516- 701 -70 746025 049630 02/06/92 3.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 28- 4516- 701 -70 746521 8863 049830 02/06/92 51.55 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 28- 4516- 701 -70 746025 049630 02/06/92 66.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 746782 8885 517.55 kkkkkk kkk -CKS 049B32 02/06/92 78.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 22810 8518 049832 02/04/92 90.50 BEST LOCK OF MPLS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 23297 8926 049632 02/11/92 40.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 023113 9301 049632 02/10/92 118.25 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 022965 8644 049632 02/11/92 229.50 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 023503 9287 556.25 " k k k k k k k k k - C K S 049835 02/04/92 245.25 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4248 - 704 -70 013289 8151 049635 02/06/92 51.07 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 013487 8875 296.32 kkkkkk kkk -CKS 049859 02/04/92 5,985.91 BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 25- 4201 - 395 -30 5,985.91 kkkkkk kkk -CKS 049B74 02/11/92 285.00 BRADLEY BENN REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 049674 02/11/92 270.00 BRADLEY BENN AC OFFICE ADM 23- 4120 - 611 -61 049674 02/11/92 20.00 BRADLEY BENN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 575.00 kkkkkk kkk -CKS 049879 02/04/92 18.11 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 375 -30 8772 18.11 k kk -CKS :::Bg 4 02/06/92 54.00 BUS MACH SALE /SERV SERVICES 30- 4288 - 781 -78 12959 54.00 * kkkkkk ^**-CKS 049C04 02/04/92 52.00 CAMPBELL SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 622 -62 4322 52.00 * kkkkkk kkk -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 049C08 02/10/92 155.60 CSI RADIO REPAIRS 10-4248-440-44-15637 8893 155.60 * * *** ** * ** -CKS 049C25 02/06/92 53.96 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 53.96 * ** * * ** * ** -CKS 049C30 02/10/92 109.45 CITY BEER BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 109.45 * * * * * ** *** -CKS 049C32 02/04/92 73.98 FRAN CALLAHAN JAN MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 73.98 * 049C33 02/10/92 69.21 CITY OF EDINA WATER 27- 4258 - 662 -66 69.21 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049C36 02/04/92 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CLEAN WINDOWS 50- 4274 - 821 -82 049C36 02/04/92 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CLEAN WINDOWS 50- 4274 - 841 -84 049C36 02/04/92 13.50- CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CLEAN WINDOWS 50- 4274 - 841 -84 049C36 02/04/92 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CLEAN WINDOWS 50- 4274 - 841 -84 049C36 02/04/92 13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CLEAN WINDOWS 50- 4274 - 861 -86 40.50 049C37 02/04/92 41.30 CLANCY DRUG INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 41.30 049C38 02/10/92 623.50 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP TURN -OUT GEAR 10- 4574- 440 -44 003049 7660 623.50 * * * * ** *** -CKS 049C44 02/11/92 1,020.09 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 049C44 02/10/92 163.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82• 049C44 02/06/92 429.37 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 049C44 02/10/92 759.36 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 5074632- 862 -86 2,372.57 * * * * ** - * ** -CKS 049C51 02/06/92 284.60 MN DEPT OF FUEL TAX 10- 4612- 560 -56 284.60 * * * * ** - * ** -CKS 049C62 02/06/92 380.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 380.00 * * * *.* * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 049C64 02/11/92 20.31 SYSCO MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 049C64 02/11/92 65.63 SYSCO MN CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 663 -66 049C64. 02/11/92 424.60 SYSCO MN COST /GOODS SOLD 27- 4624- 663 -66 510.54 * ** -CKS 049C85 02/11/92 26.00 CULLIGAN SERVICES 10- 4200 - 482 -48 26.00 * * * * ** *** -CKS 049C87 02/06/92 71.84 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 482 -48- 8775 049C87 02/06/92 172.79 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 8775\ 244.63 * 049C88 02/11/92 169.25 CURTIS 1000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 728650 169.25 * 049089 02/04/92 5,650.00 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. MOWER REPLACE 10- 4901- 650 -64 8721 8685 5,650.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049C93 02/04/92 181.21 CERT HYD SPEC MOTOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 98944 8836 181.21 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049D01 02/06/92 185.52 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 185.52 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049D05 02/04/92 114.25 D. C. ANNIS SEWER REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 114.25 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049D27 02/11/92 38.21 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 27- 4624- 663 -66 9030 38.21 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049D29 02/06/92 55.6 0 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 55.60 * * * * ** CKS 049D52 02/04/92 67.30 DISPATCH COMM /MN CABLE /CRYSTAL 10- 4294 - 560 -56 93862 7380 049D52 02/06/92 286.25- DISPATCH COMM /MN MAINT CONTRACT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 93860 049D52 02/06/92 450.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO PARTS 10- 4294 - 560 - 56.93860 049D52 02/06/92 286.25 DISPATCH COMM /MN MAINT CONTRACT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 17419 049D52 02/04/92 450.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN MOBILE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 93861. 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049D52 02/06/92 286.25 DISPATCH COMM /MN MAINT CONTRACT 049D52 02/10/92 50.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN SERVICE CONTRACT 1,303.55 * # # # # ## 049D54 02/04/92 100.00 DAVID BLOOD POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * # # # # ## 049D61 02/04/92 100.00 DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * # # # # ## 049D70 02/06/92 1,236.39 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER CHEMICALS 049D70 02/11/92 50.00 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER CHEMICALS 1,286.39 * # # # # ## 049D79 02/10/92 17,152.17 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 17,152.17 * # # # # ## 049D84 02/04/92 200.00 DRUMMOND AM CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 049D84 02/04/92 239.81 DRUMMOND AM CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 439.81 * # # # # ## 049D98 02/06/92 842.40 DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 842.40 * # # # # ## 049EII 02/10/92 163.20 EAGLE WINE BEER 163.20 * # # # # ## 049E14 02/11/92 1,557.00 EARL F. ANDERSON PARTS 049E14 02/04/92 262.10 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 1,819.10 049E17 02/10/92 5,787.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 049E17 02/06/92 8,499.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 049E17 02/10/92 7,484.75 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 049E17 02/10/92 113.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 049E17 02/06/92 226.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 049E17 02/10/92 361.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 02 -18 -92 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 93860 30- 4288 - 782 -78 94294 *** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4100- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 40- 4622- 805 -80 888166 4103 40- 4622- 805 -80 866747 4103 * ** -CKS 10- 4218 - 220 -22 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 301 -30 8633 10- 4504 - 646 -64 8633 * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 47518 * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 534169 **A-CKS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 112657 8725 10- 4542 - 325 -30 112222 7881 ## *_CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 1992 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 16 CHECK REGISTER MESSAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 22,472.25 * * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 140 -14 RR *RRR * ** -CKS 049E26 02/10/92 83.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 83.75 * * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 RRRRRR * ** -CKS 049E33 02/06/92 15.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER MEETING * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 420 -42 15.00 * R *::E:: CKS 60- 1300 - 019 -19 004896 7977 0 02/11/92 5,285.25 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SERVICES 049E41 02/10/92 5,910.30 EDINN PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION 11,195.55 RRRRRR 049E51 02/10/92 30.00 EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.00 * RRRRRR 049E60 02/06/92 36.50 ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. REPAIRS 36.50 * R R R R R R 049E73 02/10/92 54.17 EMER MED. PRODUCTS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 54.17 * R R R R R R 049E94 02/06/92 285.00 ESS BROS & SONS REPAIR PARTS 285.00 * RRRRRR 049F02 02/10/92 273.60 FACILITY SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION 273.60 * R R R R R R 049F19 02/06/92 846.17 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 1,098.50 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 669.50 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 475.99 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 599.00 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 704.50 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 049F19 02/06/92 705.50 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 5,099.16 049F20 02/11/92 276.25 FAST FRAME GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -1145- 000 -00 10- 1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 41- 4298 - 900 -90 66- 4298 - 000 -00 23- 4504- 611 -61 693691 7097 * ** -CKS 02 -18 -92 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. 4 MESSAGE **A-CKS 50- 4630- 862 -86 68894 * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 60- 1300 - 025 -20 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 152907 9125 * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 420 -42 101914 8903 CKS 60- 1300 - 019 -19 004896 7977 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 025 -20 9272 10 -1145- 000 -00 10- 1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 10 -1145- 000 -00 41- 4298 - 900 -90 66- 4298 - 000 -00 23- 4504- 611 -61 693691 7097 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 276.25 * * * * * ** 049F59 02/10/92 29.60 FRANK J. ZAMBONI GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.60 * * * * * ** 049F73 02/11/92 346.00 SUSAN FRAME PT AC OFFICE 346.00 * 049G01 02/05/92 20.08 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 20.08 * * *** ** 049G05 02/06/92 1,165.00 GRAFFIX SHOPPE LETTERING 1,165.00 * * * * * ** 049G08 02/04/92 3,970.28 G.L. CONTRACTING INC REPAIRS 3,970.28 * * * * * ** 049G13 02/06/92 497.50 GARTNER REFRIG INC. REPAIRS 497.50 * 049G15 02/11/92 28.00 GEM TAP SERV BEER LINES 28.00 * 049G16 02/04/92 3.25 GAS SUPPLY INC. REPAIR PARTS 3.25 * * * * ** 049G24 02/06/92 804.42 PAT GREER SERVICES 804.42 * * * * * ** 049G28 02/04/92 112.64 GENERAL PARTS /SUP REPARIS 112.64 * 049G38 02/04/92 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICES * * ** ** 100.00 * 02 -18 -92 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. M MESSAGE * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 21597 8323 * ** -CKS 23- 4120 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 30- 4262- 782 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 440 -44 5485 6681 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 28992 8924 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 006774 9150 * ** -CKS 27- 4630- 663 -66 9031 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10601 8688 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 678516 8887 * ** -CKS 10- 4100- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EIANA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 049G42 02/11/92 160.02 049G42 02/11/92 189.00 ,349.02 * RRRRR R 049G64 02/11/92 234.27 234.27 * R *RRRR 049G70 02/11/92 105.00 105.00 * RRRRR R 049G72 02/10/92 134.00 134.00 RRRRRR 049H03 02/06/92 2,371.20 - 049H03 02/06/92 2,371.20 049H03 02/06/92 4,710.76 049H03 02/06/92 2,371.20 049H03 02/06/92 260.96 7,342.92 RRRRR R 049H09 02/05/92 1,128.00 049H09 02/06/92 293.70 1,421.70 RRRRRR 049H16 02/04/92 917.83 049H16 02/05/92 888.00 1,805.83 RRRRR R 049H22 02/04/92 100.00 100.00 RRRRRR 049H31 02/06/92 43.49 049H31 02/04/92 437.93 - 049H31 02/04/92 562.50 168.06 049H32 02/11/92 35.00 35.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS GRUBERS POWER EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES MARGARET GUST GARY SMIEJA HYDRO SUPPLY CO HYDRO SUPPLY CO HYDRO SUPPLY CO HYDRO SUPPLY CO HYDRO SUPPLY CO HALLMAN HALLMAN H&L MESABI H &L MESABI HAROLD SWANSON HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS HEDGES -DIANA ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS WATER METER WATER METER WATER METER WATER METER METER PARTS OIL PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS POLICE SERVICES RINK PAINT CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 02 -18 -92 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 29- 4572- 722 -72 65962 9197 29- 4648- 722 -72 65962 9197 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 643 -64 * ** -CKS 23- 4201- 611 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4540- 560 -56 * ** -CKS 40- 1120 - 000 -00 4286 8536 40- 1120- 000 -00 4286 8536 40- 1220 - 000 -00 4285 8536 40 -1220- 000 -00 4286 8536 40- 4540 - 807 -80 4256 8536 R R R -CKS 10- 4618 - 560 -56 122094 8514 10- 4620 - 560 -56 122914 8694 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3093 7862 10- 4540 - 560 -56 003046 8620 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4544 - 648 -64 10351 8841 30- 4504 - 783 -78 9210 30- 4504 - 783 -78 8128 23- 3625 - 000 -00 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RRRRRR 049H36 02/10/92 142.61 HENN CTY MED CENTER FIRST AID SUPPLIES 049H36 02/10/92 1,142.05 HENN CTY MED CENTER FIRST AID SUPPLIES 103300 8802 1,284.66 * 049H37 02/04/92 90.00 HENN TECH CENTER CONT ED 30- 4256- 784 -78 90.00 * 9284 RRR *RR 036340 9284 049H42 02/06/92 1,268.31 HERMAN MILLER INC. OFFICE SYSTEM 9282 1,268.31 " *RRRRR 049H60 02/11/92 56.60 HOBART CORP REPAIRS 049H60 02/11/92 12.59 HOBART CORP MAINT 69.19 * R *RRRR 049H65 02/04/92 100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * RRRRRR 049H74 02/06/92 46.86 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 46.86 * RRRRRR 049H85 02/04/92 25.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIRS 25.00 * RRRRRR 049I12 02/10/92 851.31 IBM DATA PROCESSING 851.31 * RRRRRR 049I42 02/11/92 39.28 INDUST SUPPLY CO. BEARINGS 39.28 * RRRRRR 049I59 02/10/92 84.40 INTERIOR COM SYS EQUIP MAINT 049I59 02/11/92 198.70 INTERIOR COM SYS TELEPHONE 049I59 02/11/92 288.00 INTERIOR COM SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 571.10 RRRRRR 049I78 02/11/92 203.60 ISIA GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -18 -92 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 4 MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4510- 420 -42 1601 2529 10- 4510 - 440 -44 1601 2529 10- 4202 - 281 -28 * ** -CKS 30 -1340- 000 -00 719801 7908 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 076875 9302 27- 4288 - 663 -66 RRR -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4262- 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 8700 * ** -CKS 10- 4233 - 440 -44 7456 * ** -CKS 30- 4504- 783 -78 103300 8802 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 420 -42 036339 30- 4256- 784 -78 036333 9284 30- 4288 - 782 -78 036340 9284 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 032255 9282 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 203.60 " " "" -CKS 049J01 02/11/92 260.00 JILL CAMERON TRAINING 10- 4201 - 500 -50 1096 260.00 " . " "... " "" -CKS 049J23 02/04/92 86.65 JR JOHNSON SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 42064 7457 049J23 02/04/92 82.50 JR JOHNSON SUP PLANTS 30 =4660- 782 -78 50013 8586 049J23 02/10/92 143.95 JR JOHNSON SUP PLANTS 30- 4660- 782 -78 52978 9142 313.10 " """ -CKS 049J31 02/05/92 232.17 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 1145 - 000 -00 049J31 02/05/92 24.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 049J31 02/05/92 109.74 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 049J31 02/05/92 18.92 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 049J31 02/05/92 22.44 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 049J31 02/05/92 101.85 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 049J31 02/05/92 118.91 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 049J31 02/05/92 6.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1074504 - 480 -48 049J31 02/05/92 29.09 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10;4504- 520 -52 049J31 02/05/92 2.38' JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 049J31 02/05/92 25.37 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1074504 - 540 -54 049J31 02/05/92 134.56 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 049J31 02/05/92 271.47 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1074504- 646 -64 049J31 02/05/92 96.38 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 277-4504- 661 -66 049J31 02/05/92 60.52 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27,- 4504 - 667 -66 049J31 02/05/92 138.13 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 049J31 02/05/92 294.48 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 049J31 02/05/92 43.02 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 049J31 02/05/92 40.25 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 049J31 02/05/92 23.49 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 40- 4580- 801 -80 1,794.31 " " " " " ■. " "" -CKS 049J35 02/10/92 30.63 JERRYS PRINTING CULTURAL EXPO 10:- 4280 - 504 -50 11594 9227 049J35 02/06/92 35.13 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 600 -60 C10164 049J35 02/04/92 27.50 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 40- 4600- 800 -80 9958 93.26 " " "" -CKS 049J74 02/10/92 299.82 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 30- 4544 - 784 -78 30309 9074 049J74 02/10/92 .212.53 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 30- 4544 - 784 -78 28606 8742 049J74 02/10/92 127.02 JUSTUS LUMBER• LUMBER - 30- 4544 - 784 -78 28001 8668 639.37 " . " " ■ "" " "" -CKS 049J97 02/04/92 32.38 JOANNA FOOTE MAG EXP 12- 4215- 434 -43 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE RRRRRR 10- 4540 - 520 -52 049J99 02/11/92 RRRRR R 10- 4540 - 520 -52 049K09 02/04/92 RRRRR R 10- 4604- 646 -64 049K14 02/06/92 RRRRR* 10- 4604- 646 -64 049K23 02/06/92 049K23 02/11/92 RRRRRR 9182 049K35 02/06/92 049K35 02/04/92 049K35 02/04/92 049K35 02/06/92 049K35 02/10/92 049K35 02/06/92 049K35 02/06/92 049K35 02/04/92 049K35 02/11/92 049K35 02/04/92 049K35 02/11/92 049K35 02/04/92 RRRRRR 40- 4504- 803 -80 049K45 02/04/92 RRRRRR 049K57 02/10/92 049K57 02/10/92 049K57 02/10/92 049K57 02/10/92 RRRRR R 049L01 02/06/92 AMOUNT 32.38 * 40.00 40.00 * 246.34 246.34 * 118.02 118.02 * 132.30 174.83 307.13 * 53.59 244.34 87.92 19.74 35.64 5.58 34.43 52.63 50.64 43.09 24.78 304.13 956.51 " 475.00 475.00 " 3,098.65 4,217.25 213.50 54.00 7,583.40 44.88 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JANET CANTON KAMAN INDUST TECH KAPAK CORP KELLY SERVICES INC KELLY SERVICES INC KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KOKESH ATHLETIC KUETHER DIST. CO KUETHER DIST. CO KUETHER DIST. CO KUETHER DIST. CO LINDA KOZAK MILEAGE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES SERVICES PRO SERVICES 02 -18 -92 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8696 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 420 -42 58706 9123 * ** -CKS 30- 4201- 781 -78 9204 30- 4201 - 781 -78 9285 * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 022559 8853 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 021610 8783 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 011325 8941 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 011800 9117 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 011998 9182 LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 011681 9105 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 011666 9100 SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 010578 8593 SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 012037 9209 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 702 -70 011119 8893 LUMBER 30- 4544 - 784 -78 011496 9128 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 803 -80 021416 8766 * ** -CKS COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 60354 8576 * ** -CKS BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE PAGE 22 AMOUNT 049L05 02/04/92 * * * * * * * ** -CKS 049L28 02/04/92 049L28 02/04/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/04/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/04/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/04/92 049L28 02/06/92 049L28 02/04/92 * * * * * * 137.50 04904 02/10/92 426.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS 049L42 02/10/92 049L42 02/10/92 * * * * ** LAWSON PRODUCTS 049L46 02/11/92 049L46 02/11/92 364.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS 049L66 02/04/92 * * ** ** 049L97 02/04/92 * * * * ** 22.69 049M02 02/04/92 049M02 02/04/92 049M02 02/05/92 CHECK REGISTER PAGE 22 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 44.88 * ** -CKS 1014208- 600 -60 84.15 LAURA HINTON MILEAGE 84.15 456.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 441.62 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 439.32 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 389.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 62.47 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 239.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 137.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 426.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 238.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 127.05 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 471.95 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 364.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 3,794.25.. * 22.69 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 22.69 * 116.00 LESCO SUPPLIES 156.25 LESCO SEED. 272.25 * ** -CKS 27- 4262 - 664 -66 60.13 LIEN INFECTION CON SANITATION 78.43 LIEN INFECTION CON SANITATION 138.56 27 -4504- 664 -66 498.98 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 498.98 6388 100.00 MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES 100.00 27- 4201 - 682 -66 785.94 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 261.57 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.. REPAIR. PARTS 2,335.80 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 02 -18 -92 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 0 MESSAGE * ** -CKS 1014208- 600 -60 *** -CKS 10- 4504- 301 -30 8627 10- 4504 - 560 -56 8371 10- 4504- 560 -56 8411 10- 4540 - 322 -30 8370 10 -4540- 560 -56 8627 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8778 10- 4580 - 560 -56 8778 10- 4580 - 560 -56 8368 10 =4620- 560 -56 8777 10- 4620 - 560 -56 8626 40- 4504- 803 -80 8779 40 =4580- 801 -80 8410 * ** -CKS 27- 4262 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS 27 -4504- 664 -66 6388 27- 4562- 664 -66 6388 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 682 -66 9035 27- 4201 - 667 -66 9035 * ** -CKS 30- 4540- 784 -78 141026 875.2 *** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 21828 8835 10- 4540 - 560 -56 21509 8600 10- 4540 - 560 -56 21473 8701 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049M02 02/06/92 049M03 02/06/92 * * * * ** 049M07 02/10/92 049M07 02/06/92 049M07 02/10/92 049M07 02/06/92 * * * * ** ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. * 049M10 02/06/92 049M19 02/04/92 049M19 02/04/92 049M22 02/06/92 049M22 02/06/92 * * * * ** 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/04/92 049M27 02/04/92 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/06/92 049M27 02/11/92 049M27 02/10/92 04SM27 02/10/92 049M27 02/10/92 049M27 02/10/92 ***A** 04SM32 02/04/92 049M32 02/10/92 049M32 02/04/92 049M32 02/10/92 049M32 02/04/92 CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 23 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. * MESSAGE 390.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 76033 3,773.31 * 2,269.31 MN STATE TREA /BLG IN SURCHARGE 10- 3095- 000 -00 2,269.31 * * ** -CKS 3,891.20 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 6,166.40 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 147.60 MARK VII SALES MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 175.20 MARK VII SALES MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 10,380.40 * * ** -CKS 5,989.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC CHARGE 10- 3095- 000 -00 5,989.00 * * ** -CKS 138.32 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 79.15 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 217.47 * * ** -CKS 80.00 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 10- 4620_ 560 -56 184948 8712 150.96 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 188344 8954 230.96 * * ** -CKS 195.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 29076 8820 138.70 MERIT SUPPLY FLOOR FINISH 10- 4512- 540 -54 29006 8699 440.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4540 - 375 -30 29008 8602 440.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4540 - 540 -54 29008 8602 200.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 702 -70 29117 8996 565.00 MERIT SUPPLY SWEEPER 30 -1340- 000 -00 29122 8662 456.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 29100 8878 339.41 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 782 -78 29119 8914 371.95 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 29132 9008 331.80- MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 783 -78 29214 9198 331.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 783 -78 29214 9198 331.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 784 -78 29214 9198 442.05 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 784 -78 29235 9219 3,920.41 * ** -CKS 191.24 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 822 -82 10485 433.88 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 10656 348.00 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 842 -84 10515 173.04 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10573 172.40 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 862 -86 10425 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,318.56 # R R R # # 049M35 02/06/92 244,847.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL- SEWER SERVICE 244,847.00 " 049M46 02/11/92 13.24 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 049M46 02/11/92 9.44 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 049M46 02/06/92 40.52 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 049M46 02/04/92 89.40 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 152.60 # #R # #R 049M53 02/06/92 97.00 MILHOFF STEEL REPAIR PARTS 97.00 049M54 02/10/92 155.61 MOORE MEDICAL CORP FIRST AID.SUPPLIES 155.61 " # ##R #R 049M56 02/11/92 90.82 MIDWEST SPORTS MKTG GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.82 R# R R R R 049M63 02/10/92 161.21 MN. BAR MIX 049M63 02/06/92 657.48 MN. BAR MIX 049M63 02/10/92 290.25 MN. BAR MIX 1,108.94 " # # # #RR 049M68 02/06/92 86.50. CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 049M68 02/06/92 73.73 CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 049M68 02/06/92 60.79 CELLULAR ONE AIRTIME 221.02 # R R # R # 049M70 02/11/92 96.00 MN. CONWAY EXTING SVC 049M70 02/11/92 .43.25 MN. CONWAY EXTING SVC 139.25 # # ## ## 049M73 02/10/92 95.70 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CALL 049M73 02/10/92 91.10 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 186.80 R # R R # R 02 -18 -92 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 4 MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4312 - 812 -80 * ** -CKS 27- 4624- 662 -66 9037 28- 4624- 703 -70 590574 9147 28- 4624- 703 -70 8870 28- 4624- 703 -70 8748 * ** -CKS 4074540 - 803 -80 104644 8751 10= 4510 - 420 -42 8569 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 105786 9141 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 440 -44 8572 10-4226- 440 -44 8572 40 =4504- 801 -80 * *" -CKS 10 =4274- 420 -42 171263 8894 10- 4274 - 440 -44 171263 8894 * ** -CKS 3074288 - 782 -78 315807 30- 4288 - 782 -78 010386 * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 049M80 02/06/92 049M80 02/06/92 049M80 02/10/92 049M81 02/06/92 049M81 02/04/92 049M81 02/10/92 049M81 02/10/92 * *kkk * 10- 4210 - 140 -14 049M83 02/04/92 049M83 02/06/92 049M83 02/06/92 * * 0 *::m* 02/04/92 049M85 02/06/92 * * * * ** SUBURBAN NEWS 049M98 02/04/92 049M98 02/04/92 049M98 02/04/92 049M98 02/04/92 kkkkkk 049N11 02/06/92 *kkk * k TORO INC. 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 049N16 02/11/92 CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 25 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 24.79 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 4241 470.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 30- 4214- 781 -78 69721 1,911.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 30- 4600- 781 -78 68736 2,405.79 98.96 MN. TORO INC. REPARI PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 245643 9000 70.16 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 244959 8402 347.05 MN. TORO INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 245100 8866 81.00 MN. TORO INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 784 -78 245099 8866 597.17 * ** -CKS 248.00 MTS NW SOUND REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 99429 8325 225.00 MTS NW SOUND PRINTING 28- 4600- 701 -70 99595 9005 543.96 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 784 -78 99806 8548 1,016.96 * * ** -CKS 90.50 MN. WANNER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 13564 142.00 MN. WANNER VALVE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 13585 232.50 * * ** -CKS 164.78 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 646 -64 15,679.88 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 667 -66 2,675.94 MINNEGASCO GAS 28- 4254- 702 -70 5,496.99 MINNEGASCO GAS 30- 4254- 782 -78 24,017.59 * **A-CKS 67.40 MURRAY SANDLER SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 783 -78 1741 8884 67.40 * ** -CKS 24.84 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 301 -30 20,656.05 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 321 -30 2,806.98 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 322 -30 3,766.46 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 330 -30 3,816.27 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 375 -30 2,117.23 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 440 -44 46.75 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 460 -46 1,404.28 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10 -4252- 520 -52 2,565.78 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 4,952.65 NSP POWER/LIGHT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 1,348.80 NSP POWER /LIGHT 23- 4252 - 612 -61 68.98 NSP POWER /LIGHT 26- 4252- 682 -68 2,346.34 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252- 662 -66 178.83 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252- 664 -66 1,161.98 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 667 -66 1992 CITY OF EDINA 402.26 CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 049N16 02/11/92 8,440.84 NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252- 702 -70 049N16 02/11/92 439.65 NSP POWER /LIGHT 29- 4252 - 722 -72 049N16 02/11/92 5,985.56 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252- 782 -78 049N16 02/11/92 975.40 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 784 -78 049N16 02/11/92 2,355.99 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252- 801 -80 049N16 02/11/92 17,198.37 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 803 -80 049N16 02/11/92 1,066.65 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252- 902 -90 049N16 02/11/92 44.38 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252- 902 -90 049N16 02/11/92 678.14 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 821 -82 049N16 02/11/92 824.27 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 841 -84 049N16 02/11/92 458.67 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 861 -86 85,730.14 * 02/11/92 72.35 LL DIST SYSTEM xxxxxx SOLD 30- 4624 - 784 -78 502033 *** -CKS 049N21 02/04/92 21.48 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 772078 8767 21.48 * xxxxxx xxxxxx *** -CKS 049N31 02/04/92 402.26 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 498348 8867 049N31 02/04/92 27.17 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624- 703 -70 497146 8867 049N31 02/11/92 255.77 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 502054 9144 049N31 02/04/92 18.13- LL DIST SYSTEM CREDIT 28- 4624- 703 -70 494608 049N31 02/06/92 386.74 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624- 784 -78 500139 9207 049N31 02/06/92 113.50 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624 - 784 -78 500142 9206 049N31 02/11/92 113.50 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624- 784 -78 500142 9283 049N31 02/10/92 72.35 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624- 784 -78 502033 049N31 02/11/92 72.35 LL DIST SYSTEM COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624 - 784 -78 502033 1,425.51 * xxxxxx xxx -CKS 049N48 02/10/92 13.89 NO STAR TURF MOWER LUBRICANT 27- 4504 - 664 -66 409451 8218 13.89 ft xxxxxx *** -CKS 049N68 02/10/92 94.80 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 049N68 02/06/92 105.00 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 049N68 02/10/92 141.00 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 340.80 * xxxxxx * ** -CKS 049N76 02/06/92 266.41 NTCC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 91491 8822 266.41 * xxxxxx xxx -CKS 049N96 02/10/92 70.45 MINN COW PAGING PAGING SERVICE 30- 4288 - 782 -78 70.45 * xxxxxx *** -CKS 049030 02/11/92 3.94 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 27 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 8 MESSAGE 3.94 " * ** -CKS 049PIl 02/04/92 337.00- PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 10- 4201- 420 -42 049PIl 02/04/92 337.00 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 10- 4201- 420 -42 049PIl 02/04/92 252.00 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 049P11 02/04/92 252.00 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 10- 4201- 440 -44 049PIl 02/04/92 85.00 PARK NIC MED CTR RETURN TO WORK 10- 4246- 420 -42 589.00 * * * * * ** *** -CKS 049P13 02/10/92 9,983.78 PRECISION LANDSCAPE TREE REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 644 -64 9,983.78 * * ** * ** * ** -CKS 049P28 02/11/92 769.50 PLANT EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 805 -80 14029 9103 769.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049P30 02/11/92 69.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 30- 4624- 784 -78 049P30 02/10/92 154.79 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 049P30 02/10/92 219.88 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 049P30 02/10/92 156.39 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 600.06 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049P35 02/11/92 77.86 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 04SP35 02/11/92 40.23 PETERSON - BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 049P35 02/11/92 11.98 PETERSON- BARBARA COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624 - 784 -78 130.07 " ** ** ** * ** -CKS 049P48 02/10/92 120.70 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 784 -78 9129 120.70 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049P58 02/06/92 29.90 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 360449 29.90 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049P70 02/04/92 195.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 195.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049P78 02/11/92 156.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SHARPENING 28- 4274 - 704 -70 70229 156.00 * 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION kRkkRR 049P82 02/10/92 28.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE 049P82 02/04/92 81.18 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 109.58 ft kkkkkk 049Q01 02/11/92 39.63 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 39.63 * i R k R R R 049Q20 02/04/92 22.75 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 049Q20 02/04/92 10.80 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 049Q20 02/06/92 264.30 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 297.85 * kkkkkk 049R01 02/04/92 97.82 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIRS 97.82 * kkkkkk 049R13 02/10/92 48.00 RADIO INSTALLS RADIO RENTAL 48.00 * R R k R R k 049R21 02/06/92 931.30 RED WING SHOES SHOES 049R21 02/06/92 574.60 RED WING SHOES SHOES 049R21 02/06/92 397.80 RED WING SHOES SHOES 1,903.70 * 049R22 02/06/92 476.20 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 476.20 * kkkkkk 049R33 02/11/92 7,566.85 REX DISTR. BEER 049R33 02/10/92 8,715.60 REX DISTR. BEER 049R33 02/11/92 54.45 REX DISTR. MIX 049833 02/10/92 72.60 REX DISTR. MIX 16,409.50 kkkkkk -1349R49 eet 96f9i ------- i9;9�9 -fl@ - - - RiTEiIAY- -- - - - - -- - AMBt1tANCE -hkiDtltE •- s-174 8.00 -� kkkkkk 049R47 02/04/92 248.16 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 02 -18 -92 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 50- 4628- 822 -82 534122 50- 4632- 842 -84 532566 * ** -CKS 28- 4600 - 701 -70 045663 9217 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 45482 8264 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1900 7523 10- 4540 - 560 -56 85721 8830 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 15823 9072 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 440 -44 24428 8571 * ** -CKS 10- 4642- 301 -30 228397 10- 4642- 646 -64 40- 4642- 801 -80 228397 30- 4504 - 784 -78 01718 9205 kk* -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 * ** -CKS — - 3t?- 4991�440�4- tt94T4-4905 -- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 B64203 8495 * ** -CKS i 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248.16 " * ** -CKS 049R49 02/06/92 53,989.00 Road Rescue Ambulance Module 10- 4901 - 440 -44 125474 4965 049R49 02/10/92 56.49 ROAD RESCUE AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10= 4510- 440 -44 125642 8906 049R49 02/04/92 71.75 ROAD RESCUE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 125365 8794 2e.24, 54,117.24* * ** * * * * ** -CKS 049R53 02/04/92 425.00 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 47226 8871 425.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049R65 02/05/92 3,416.80 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 33861 8967 049R65 02/05/92 2,234.40 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -58 38862 8967 5,651.20 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049R98 02/06/92 144.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 144•.00 * ** * * ** * ** -CKS 049509 02/04/92 148.50 SCHAFER EQUIP CO LP HEATER 10- 4226 - 301 -30 160428 8697 148.50 * 049S10 02/10/92 23.50 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 025152 8807 23.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049515 02/04/92 101.85 SEARS TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 8403 101.85 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049S18 02/06/92 152.08 STERLING FENCE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 784 -78 11077 9052 152.08 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049S20 02/06/92 49.75 SAFETY KLEEN MACH SVC 10- 4318 - 280 -28 955147 49.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 049525 1 02/11/92 74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 9041 049S25 02/04/92 148.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624- 703 -70 8869 049S25 02/06/92 111.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST /GOODS SOLD 30- 4624- 784 -78 9200 333.00 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR -ITEM DESCRIPTION 049S27 02/11/92 59.52 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 59.52 " 049S31 02/04/92 139.44 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 139.44 " 049S36 02/10/92 5,445.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 049S36 02/06/92 11,037.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 049S36 02/10/92 190.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. MIX 049S36 02/06/92 113.25 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. MIX 16,786.00 " 049S38 02/10/92 355.00 SIGNAL SYSTEM TIME CLOCK 355.00 " k R R R R R 049S42 02/10/92 347.90 SEARS TOOLS 347.90 RRRRRk 049S50 02/04/92 -100.00 JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 100.00 *:::5*: 218.80 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING . 218.80 " RRkRkk ' 049S67 02/04/92 9,225.00 STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES 9,225.00 " R R R R R k 049S72 02/06/92 60.00 STREICHERS CONT -ED 60.00 *kRkkR .. 049S77 02/04/92 62.04 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 049S77 02/04/92 233.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 049S77 02/05/92 7,295.96 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 049S77 02/05/92 958.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 049S77 02/06/92 298.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 049S77 02/05/92 535.76 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 02 -18 -92 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. A MESSAGE 27- 4544 - 662 -66 1054 -9 9045 * ** -CKS 28- 4612- 704 -70 * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 5074632- 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 48691 9273 * "* -CKS 3074580- 784 -78 8879 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 30- 4214- 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 504 -50 11231 * *" -CKS 10 -4202- 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 134208 _ 10- 4248 - 560 -56 134257 1074248 - 560 -56 7735 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7951 8713 10- 4248 - 560 -56 07996 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7836 8272 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049S77 02/04/92 7.36 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/06/92 43.89 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 371.35 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/06/92 125.25 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/06/92 16.04 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049577 02/06/92 43.13 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 24.29 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/06/92 38.81 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 55.01 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/06/92 343.52 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 62.91 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 2.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 049S77 02/04/92 201.93 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10,719.99 * 049S78 02/06/92 53.88 SPS PUMP /HEAD ASSY 049578 02/06/92 291.59 SPS REPAIR PARTS 345.47 * R R R R R R 049S92 02/04/92 17.68 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.68 * R R R R R R 049703 02/10/92 19.96 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 049T03 02/06/92 43.83 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.79 RRRRRR 049T05 02/06/92 75.00 THE PRINT SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 049T05 02/04/92 385.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 049T05 02/04/92 372.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 832.00 R R R R R R 049T08 02/06/92 30.00 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 049T08 02/06/92 361.26 TARGET PHOTO SUPPLIES 391.26 * R* *RRR 049T11 02/11/92 25.20 TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.20 * R R R R R R 049T13 02/04/92 873.60 TOM HORWATH SERVICES 873.60 * RRRRRR 049T22 02/06/92 123.50 THE WINE COMPANY BEER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540- 560 -56 160221 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160468 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7953 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16066 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160576 10- 4540-560 -56 160716 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160176 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160694 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160282 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160782 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160336 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160101 10- 4540 - 560 -56 160454 10- 4514 - 520 -52 40- 4540 - 803 -80 8773 10- 4504 - 375 -30 10463 8800 10- 4504 - 430 -42 316023 8671 25- 4504- 385 -30 311577 8505 10- 4504 - 470 -47 18887 10- 4504- 628 -62 18385 8811 10- 4504- 628 -62 18152 8283 10- 4504- 420 -42 10- 4508 - 420 -42 30- 4504 - 782 -78 100150 8642 10- 4201 - 980 -64 50- 4630 - 862 -86 20504 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS RRR -CKS * ** -CKS 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 32 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 123.50 ' . ■ ■. *.. -CKS :9T 040 02/06/92 13.36 TOLL COMPANY FACE SHIELD 10- 4610- 560 -56 164183 7941 049T40 02/04/92 6.62 TOLL COMPANY OXYGEN REFIL 27- 4580 - 664 -66 164517 8595 049T40 02/06/92 130.55 TOLL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 150309 7318 150.53 " ■ ■ ■... ... -CKS 049T42 02/04/92 285.00 TOOLS BY OLSEN SHOP SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 40937 9001 285.00 ' ■....■ ... -CKS 049T88 02/10/92 27.16 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 049T88 02/10/92 32.93 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 049T88 02/10/92 32.93 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 50 -4632- 862 -86 049T88 02/10/92 32.93- TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 60.09 • r...r■ • *" -CKS 049T96 02/06/92 332.00 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 30811 8947 049T96 02/05/92 828.80 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 -54 1,160.80 " . *o* r..- K g* 049U05 02/04/92 27.39 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 781 -78 8982 27.39 " ...... .r■ -CKS 049U14 02/04/92 70.07 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 7750 049U14 02/04/92 232.79 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 8771 049U14 02/04/92 97.84 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 8768 049U14 02/04/92 60.22 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 385 -30 8796 460.92 " *..... ... -CKS 049U25 02/04/92 36.60 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 10- 4510- 440 -44 763643 8899 36.60 " *r -CKS :::..* U27 02/11/92 49.14 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 436 -42 049U27 02/11/92 201.91 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 440 -44 049U27 02/11/92 3,405.02 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 049U27 02/11/92 392.78 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 049U27 02/11/92 107.44 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62 049U27 02/11/92 151.43 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 049U27 02/11/92 98.28 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 26- 4256- 682 -68 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -18 -92 PAGE 33 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. R MESSAGE 049U27 02/11/92 496.62 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 049U27 02/11/92 54.15 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 049U27 02/11/92 231.68 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 049U27 02/11/92 39.61 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 29- 4256- 722 -72 049U27 02/11/92 50.31 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 049U27 02/11/92 100.98 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 784 -78 049U27 02/11/92 88.11 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 801 -80 049U27 02/11/92 187.00 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 803 -80 049U27 02/11/92 119.34 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 5,773.80 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049U30 02/04/92 22.90 US WEST PAGING PAGER /VINCE 10- 4256- 640 -64 9090 22.90 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049V15 02/04/92 464.20 VAN PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 395261 9047 049V15 02/10/92 88.05 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514- 822 -82 396468 9138 049V15 02/10/92 722.00- VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514- 841 -84 396469 9138 049V15 02/10/92 722.00 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 841 -84 396469 9138 049V15 02/10/92 722.00 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514- 842 -84 396469 049V15 02/10/92 1,073.95 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514- 862 -86 396470 2,348.20 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049V30 02/04/92 480.20 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11917 8188 049V30 02/10/92 1,996.50 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 013 -20 3177 8861 2,476.70 * RRRRRR ** *_CKS 049V36 02/06/92 371.94 VAUGHN DISPLAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 045558 8888 371.94 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049W08 02/04/92 163.31 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 607562 8999 163.31 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049W15 02/04/92 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049W52 02/04/92 100.00 WILLIAM WALSH POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * RRRRRR RRR -CKS 049W66 02/06/92 112.55 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 390643 8819 1992 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 049W66 02/04/92 83.04 WILLIAMS STEEL PARTS 195.59 * RRRRRR 049W92 02/04/92 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * RRRRRR 02/10/92 MAINT CHARGE 49X05 452.41 * erox oro * R * R R R 049Z14 02/04/92 39.27 ZIEGLER INC KNOB 39.27 * RRRRRR 258,653.27 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 410.56 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3,407.70 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 6,685.59 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 2,467.26 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 52,391.01 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 18,122.40 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 828.28 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 36,247.76 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 281=742.61 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 2,446.95 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 87,176.41 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 237,621.72 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 757.10 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 988,958.62 TOTAL 02 -18 -92 PAGE 34 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 388921 8692 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4226- 510 -51 *AA-CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8375 * ** -CKS oe�� UJ �J • ~�bRPOM��O/ .tltlB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Subject: EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPOR Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent ❑ Information Only 7 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached herewith is a copy of the Audited Financial Statements for 1990, for the East Edina Housing Foundation. This report has now been accepted by the Board of Directors of the Foundation and they requested that I transmit this copy to you for your information. 500 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 -145 612 332 -0001 FAX 612 332 -8361 GrantThornton T Accountants and Management Consultants The U.S. Member Firm of Grant Thornton Internationai REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Board of Directors East Edina Housing Foundation We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of East Edina Housing Foundation (a Minnesota non - profit corporation) as of Decem- ber 31, 1990, and the related statement of support and revenue, expenses, and changes in fund balance for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Foundation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial state- ments are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the finan- cial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of East Edina Housing Foundation as of December 31, 1990, and the results of its opera- tions for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted ac- counting principles. WIME Minneapolis, Minnesota October 7, 1991 East Edina Housing Foundation BALANCE SHEET December 31, 1990 ASSETS Second mortgage notes (notes A 1 and B) Cash, including $384,291 of certificates of deposit (note C) Accrued interest receivable from Second mortgage notes (note B) Cash and certificates of deposit FUND BALANCE Designated (note C) Undesignated The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. $3,106,761 858,951 430,211 13,808 444,019 $4,409,731 $ 386,000 4,023,731 $4,409,731 East Edina Housing Foundation STATEMENT OF SUPPORT AND REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Year ended December 31, 1990 Support and revenue Second mortgage notes received from developer (note B) Interest income from second mortgage notes (note B) Interest income from cash and certificates of deposit Expenses Write -off of second mortgage note Other Excess of support and revenue over expenses Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. $ 123,500 141,737 64,421 329,658 10,400 1,592 11,992 317,666 4,092,065 $4,409,731 East Edina Housing Foundation NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 1990 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES East Edina Housing Foundation (the Foundation) acts as the exclusive developer of certain undeveloped property in the city of Edina, Minnesota. Its purpose is to provide a means to develop affordable housing for moderate income persons. One way it achieves this objective is by providing second mortgage financing to qualified indivi- duals to assist in the purchase of a home. A summary of significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements follows. 1. Second Mortgage Notes The Foundation considers second mortgage notes and related accrued interest receiv- able to be fully collectible; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is pro- vided. If amounts become uncollectible, they will be charged to expense when that determination is made. 2. Income Taxes The Foundation qualifies as a nonprofit organization under the regulations of the Internal Revenue Service and the State of Minnesota; accordingly, no provision for income taxes is provided. NOTE B - SECOND MORTGAGE NOTES The Foundation' provides second mortgage financing to qualified individuals to assist in the purchase of condominium units in a residential, retail, and office mixed project in Edina. Interest is accrued on these notes at a simple, noncompounded annual rate of 5.00%. The entire principal and accrued interest portion of the notes are due upon the re -sale of the unit, or when the first mortgage is paid off. These second mortgage notes are collateralized by the underlying property, subject to the first mortgage. The Foundation receives second mortgage notes from the private developer of the project (see note C) in exchange for cash or in consideration of property previously transferred to the developer and improvements undertaken by the Housing and Rede- velopment Authority of Edina on such property. East Edina Housing Foundation NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED December 31, 1990 NOTE C - COMMITMENTS The Foundation has entered into two agreements which define its responsibilities toward the development of the project. The first, with the Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority of Edina as owner of the property, designates the Foundation as the exclusive redeveloper of the project. The second agreement, between the Foundation and a private developer, sets out the responsibilities for developing the property and providing the second mortgage note financing. Additionally, the Foundation has entered into an agreement with the City of Edina in which the City will be reimbursed for services provided to the Foundation. To date, staff time provided by employees of the City has not and will not be billed to the Foundation. Also, the Foundation's board of directors has designated $800,000 to be committed for second mortgage financing relating to the Centennial Lakes Project. As of Decem- ber 31, 1990, $414,000 has been used for this purpose with $386,000 remaining as designated. A. o ewe � •'�bRl�ORA' °�/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland Agenda Item # From: Janet Chandler Consent Information Only Date: February 18, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Recycling: 0 To Council 1991 Summary Report Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resoiution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info/ Background: This report summarizes the 1991 recycling program results with regard to tonnage, waste abatement, participation and market situations. Attached: 1. Spreadsheet showing monthly recycling activity (pg. 3) 2. Graph showing sources of recycling (pg. 4) 1990 -1991 camnarison Tons Waste Participation Estimated Recycled Abatement Average Daily Monthly Set -out Rate Participation 1990 '4051 tons 20.1% 59% 76.7% 1991 4908 tons 24.3% 63.4% 82.4% 2 �l 4908 Tons Recycled in 1991 Edina's recycling efforts for 1991 compare very favorably to other cities in this area. By recycling paper, glass, cans, plastic and magazines, Edina residents reduced their total garbage by 24.3 %. The new requirements and systems for handling yardwaste are diverting another 10% of the waste stream from landfills or incinerators. Large appliances, tires, and household goods are also being recycled; tonnage reports on these materials are being tracked by Hennepin County and will be available later. Recycling in apartments and condominiums, which began in January, 1991, contributed 965 tons to the yearly total of 4908 tons. Thirteen tons of magazines and catalogs were collected during the startup month of December. Plastic bottle collection which began in January, totaled 105 tons for.the year. Participation The average daily set -out (63.4 %) rate is computed by dividing the total number of actual stops by the total number of possible stops each month. This information is provided by the recycling hauler from the daily drivers' reports. Many regular recyclers participate less frequently than once a week. Edina's monthly participation is estimated to be 82.4 %, using a formula based on St. Louis Park's experience and statistics. This estimate may be too modest, taking into account the total tons recycled. Reecvclina Markets Markets continue to exist for recyclables, but prices have dropped. The principle cause is the recession, which has reduced demand for boxes, bottles and other containers. The market for newspaper stock is weak because of less advertising. Currently the brightest markets are for glass, aluminum, steel and magazines. An upturn in the economy, would have a very positive effect on these recycling markets. Plastic markets are very uncertain. There is a greater supply than the fledgling recycled plastic industry can absorb. Some resins are in greater demand than others, with mixed colored plastics at the bottom of the list. In the future, plastics will probably require sorting by color and type in ° order to be marketable. Equipment has been developed to shred, sort and clean plastic automatically. As new facilities come on line, the plastic recycling situation will improve. In the meantime, haulers may have to hand -sort plastic in order to find a market. Looking Ahead Edina is now recycling a full complement of materials. In the future, we hope to add mixed paper (letters) and additional plastics. Because of the weak markets, this probably will not be possible until 1993. Edina residents have enthusiastically supported recycling; participation is high -- perhaps as high as can reasonably be expected. Therefore, it is anticipated that 1992 recycling tonnage will show a smaller increase than the past two years to 5,000+ tons, and a waste reduction rate of about 25 %., 2CNCL92.FWX CHANDLER EDINA RECYCLNG 1991 3. 1991 SOURCE PAPER GLASS OFFICE CANS CORRUG PLASTIC PAPER TOTAL ABATE PARTIC MONT RECYCL CENT INCOME MAT'L JANUARY Single tam 246.31 62.15 14.88 6.61 0.66 330.61 19.7% 61.9% 80.5% $0.00 paper Multi -unit 48.14 10.91 7.86 1.70 0.47 69.08 4.1% $130.00 glass Racy Cent 7.60 2.60 1.17 2.75 14.12 0.8% $187.99 cans Total 302.05 75.66 23.91 8.31 1.13 413.81 24.6% $317.99 total FEBRUARY Single tam 193.89 48.93 11.71 5.20 0.52 260.25 15.5% 61.1% 79.4% $0.00 paper Mufti -unit 49.48 14.93 6.84 1.42 0.48 73.15 4.4% $143.00 glass Racy Cent 8.72 2.86 0.70 0.80 13.08 0.8% $177.94 cans Total 252.09 66.72 19.25 6.62 1.00 346.48 20.6% $320.94 total MARCH Single tam 176.29 62.81 19.67 5.21 6.96 270.94 16.1% 60.6% 78.8% $0.00 paper) Multiunit 51.68 14.03 7.33 1.29 0.47 74.80 4.5% $141.30 glass Racy Cent 8.08 2.96 0.58 2.25 13.87 0.8% $91.26 cans Total 236.05 79.80 27.58 6.50 7.43 359.61 21.4% $232.56 total APRIL Single tam 213.06 73.47 22.65 7.14 8.74 325.06 19.3% 63.7% 82.8% $0.00 paper Multiunit 60.47 15.09 5.83 1.27 0.53 83.19 5.0% $111.10 glass Racy Cent 11.18 2.53 0.65 1.75 16.11 1.0% $104.75 cans Total 284.71 91.09 29.13 8.41 9.27 424.36 25.3% $215.85 total MAY Single tam 220.64 77.63 25.54 8.25 977 341.83 20.3% 64.2% 83.5% $0.00 paper Mufti-unit 63.09 14.19 5.42 1.08 0.50 84.28 5.0% $141.70 glass Racy Cent 10.07 3.15 0.95 1.65 15.82 0.9% $180.14 cans Total 293.80 94.97 31.91 9.33 10.27 441.93 26.3% $321.84 total JUNE Single tam 187.62 67.82 24.99 7.26 8.59 296.28 17.6% 66.1% 85.9% $0.00 paper Mufti-unit 57.10 13.36 5.15 1.59 0.52 77.72 4.6% $264.50 glass Racy Cent 9.06 6.09 0.81 4.49 20.45 1.2% $141.91 cans Total 253.78 87.27 30.95 8.85 9.11 394.45 23.5% $406.41 total JULY Single tam 197.13 72.48 27.68 7.63 9.37 314.29 18.7% 64.7% 84.1 $0.00 paper Multi -unit 61.15 15.66 5.25. 1.20 1.19 84.45 5.0% $125.60 glass Racy Cent 8.14 3.00 0.81 0.78 12.73 0.8% $153.11 cans Total 266.42 91.14 33.74 8.83 10.56 411.47 24.5% $278.71 total AUGUST Single tam 196.50 69.13 25.90 6.80 8.97 307.30 18.3% 63.6% 82.7% $72.54 paper Mufti -unit 56.47 15.99 3.65 1.31 0.95 78.37 4.7% $132.40 glass Racy Cent 8.54 3.14 0.72 3.33 15.73 0.9% $87.39 cans Total 261.51 88.26 30.27 8.11 9.92 401.40 23.9% $292.33 total SEPTEMBER Single tam 193.28 68.07 23.93 7.02 9.62 301.92 18.0% 65.1% 84.6% $99.10 paper Mufti -unit 55.84 14.48 4.08 1.23 1.40 77.03 4.6% $116.80 glass Racy Cent 9.91 2.88 0.85 j 2.63 16.27 1.0% $149.52 cans Total 259.03 85.43 28.86 8.25 11.02. 395.22 23.5% $365.42 total OCTOBER Single tam 214.03 74.18 29.25 "8.20. 10.93 336.59 20.0% 64.5 %. 83.9% $0.00 paper Multiunit 64.89 20.52 7.71 2.05 0.76 95.93 5.7% $78.90 glass Racy Cent 7.80 2.05 0.87 1.34 12.06 0.7% $329.02 cans Total 286.72 96.75 37.83 10.25 11.69 444.58 26.5% $407.92 total NOVEMBER Single tam 186.83 65.39 27.43 6.53 9.78 295.96 17.6% 59.9% .77.9% $112.40 paper Mu&unft 48.58 16.18 5.11 0.89 1.17 71.93 4.3% $125.10 glass Racy Cent 11.24 2.99 0.00 1.83 16.06 1.0% $0.00 cans Total 246.65 84.56 32.54 7.42 10.95 383.95 22.9% $237.50 total Dec Magazines (13.17) DECEMBER Single tam 237.15 82.48 . 32.03 8.36 11.63 371.65 22.1% 65.2% 84.8 $144.75 paper Mu&unft 63.71 22.00 6.96 1.18 1.23 95.08 5.7% $146.00 glass Racy Cent 19.99 3.18 0.98 0.6 24.75 1.5% $202.83 cans Total 320.85 107.66 39.97 9.54 12.86 491.48 29.3% $493.58 total year average TOTALS Single tam 2462.73 824.54 285.66 84.21 95.54 3752.68 18.6% 63.4% 82.4 $428.79 paper 1991 Multiunit 680.60 187.34 71.19 16.21 9.67 965.01 4.8% $1.656.40 glass Racy Cent 120.33 37.43 9.09 0.00 0.00 24.2 191.05 0.9% $1,805.86 cans Total $3.891.05 total •• Participabon' is average dairy set -out rate. 'Month' is estimated monthly participation. 9l10 FA O t U) O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: r1AYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent Information Only 0 Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council WINTER AERIAL DEER Action ❑ Motion SURVEY ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Attached is a copy of the winter aerial deer survey conducted by Hennepin Parks. HENNEPIN PARKS Suburban Hennepin January 31, 1992 Regional Park District 12615 County Road 9 P.O. Box 47320 Plymouth. MN 55447 -0320 Telephone (612) 559 -9000 Gordon Hughes Fox(612)559 -3287 Assistant City Manager City of Edina Board of Commissioners 4801 West 50th Street Judith S. Anderson Edina MN 55424 Chair Bloomington Nicholas P. Eolotf Dear Gordon, Vice Chair Brooklyn Center Susan Nelson Baser As you requested, Hennepin Parks conducted a winter aerial deer Crystal survey for selected areas in Edina on 23 January, 1992. The Shirley A. Bonne survey included Braemar Golf Course north to Interl achen Country P David Dombrowski Club, including Bredsen, Walnut Ridge, and Van Valkenburg Parks. J. St. LOUIS Park The attached map shows the boundaries of the areas flown. BIII Weir Edina The survey was flown with a helicopter at low altitudes. The James M. White Orono snow conditions were good with a 4 to 12 inch base remaining from the-early winter storms. Deer were found in larger congregations Douglas F. Bryant than during last year's survey. The herding is do to snow depths Superintendent & Secretary to the Board which forced the deer into traditional "deer yards". I feel that we had a very accurate count within the areas surveyed because of these conditions. ry >9r - Year of the Wetlands in Hennepin Parks The number of deer found in your survey area was 95. The enclosed map shows the locations and distribution of deer within the city. Additional deer may be present in parts of the city not surveyed. There were 924 deer in the adjacent cities of Eden Prairie and Bloomington. These deer could easily move between cities during the course of the year. A map showing the general locations of the deer in surrounding cities is provided for your information. Hennepin Parks has flown deer surveys of the Braemar area. Our past surveys show a significant increase over the last eight years. There have also been large increases in the surrounding cities. Braemar Park Area 1992 1991 1988 1986 1985 1984 51 31 10 8 8 6 RECYCLED PAPER - Conserving Our Resources Gordon Hughes Page Two January 31, 1992 The survey took 1.5 hours at $155.00 per hour for a total cost of $ 232.50. This will be billed directly from Helicopter Flight Inc. of Crystal. If you have any questions about the survey or would like additional information regarding our impressions of the survey feel free to contact me at 476 -4663. Sincerely, i n J. Moriarty ildlife Specialist JJM056 Enclosure cc: L. Gillette #+ kill _ ...... :�I�� -_ � -(il -- (,,!{ .� �f i .F�� ,^'tI �7 rI.T I•� t �I' I ! { I �� ...,� If�.Ji `A, ,=4':m .hr �... / i s a 5 f ; t ��i- 1 .• ...ta j � Q� MJ —_ � / i rwtuc.YY.. f. ' Total Number of Deer - qS Survey Boundary ur �i 1992 Helicopter Deer Survey City of Edina Flown by Hennepin Parks _ 23 January 1992 a c f xow uxi 1. r Location of deer in surrounding communities as determined by 1992 Helicopter Deer Survey Flown by Hennepin Parks between 13 and 23 January 1992