The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-05-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 4, 1992 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL PROCLAMATIONS - Arbor Day - National Teacher Day ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda items is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of April 70, 1992 II. AWARD OF BID /OUOTE - Public Officials Liability Insurance (HRA) III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS IV. ADJOURNMENT- I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of April 20, 1992 II. PUBLIC HEARING - DRAFT EDINA CITY CODE A. Section 1045 - Storage of Recreational Vehicles B. Chapter 12 - Streets and Parks C. Chapter 13 - Trades and Occupations D. Chapter 14 - Traffic and Vehicles III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Rezoning R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double DwellinE Unit District - Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition B. Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision - Lot Coverage Variance and Side Street Setback Variance - 5236 Brookview Avenue C. Final Plat Approval - Wooddale Lakes Addition - Katter Family Partnership D. Final Report - I -494 Travel Demand Management Strategy IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council May 4, 1992 Page 2 V. AWARD OF BIDS /OUOTES A. Police Professional Liability Insurance B. Public Officials Liability Insurance - Council C. Emergency Repair - Loadal Truck VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Cemstone Request for Lease Operation B. Authorize Bids for Benton Avenue Bridge Overlay C. Liability Insurance Renewals VII. INTERGOVENMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 05/04/92: Total $579,460.98. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon May 11 Continued Board of Review 7:00 P.M .Followed by Council Work Session - Codification Mon May 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M Council Chambers Council Chambers Tues May 19 SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION Polls Open 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM Mon May 25 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED Mon June 1 Regular Council Meeting Mon June 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Poor Quality Document Disclaimer The original or copy of a document or page of a document presented at the time of digital scanning contained within this digital file may be of substandard quality for viewing, printing or faxing needs. A. 1HHH i / PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY April 24 1992 WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and WHEREAS, Edina has been recognized for the past five years as a Tree City USA by The National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue the planting of trees for its future, WHEREAS, the white oak has been of historic significance to the City of Edina and the community desires to restore the white oak forest, WHEREAS, the residents of the City of Edina in cooperation with the Edina Rotary Club will be planting 50 white oak trees, at Arneson Acres Park, in recognition of Arbor Day, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim April 24th, 1992, to be Arbor Day and call upon the public spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 24th day of April, 1992 Frederick S. Richards, Mayor City of Edina, Minnesota PROCLAMATION WHEREAS. teachers help shape and transform lives through their critical roles in the schools of this nation; and, WHEREAS. they strive to open doors to opportunity through learning; and, WHEREAS, they seek to motivate and inspire their students to develop to their full potential: and, WHEREAS. they endeavor to make learning meaningful for students from all walks of life; and, WHEREAS. they prepare this nation's students for the demands of a rapidly changing, increasingly competitive and technological society, Now, therefore, I Frederick S. Richards serving as Mayor of the City of Edina Do hereby proclaim Tuesday, May 5, 1992, as NATIONAL TEACHER DAY I urge all citizens to observe this day by taking time to remember and salute those individuals who teach — and transform lives through education. Signed this 4th day of May , 1992 LIVES .............. CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • 7000 CORNELIA DRIVE • EDINA, MN 55435 • 927 -9751 5/-O9; -1e7 ;111 -��- •i.'H- ,j/r� i`�'�'�' y ��,,, �i � lll� %�- G� •�,1� / 6 '/ /,� �c. C,`G . ��' `y,� �/.GG� < `' ).C' EGG' G• /� `,1.,�,�,._ / J "✓ // `G Lam'- ,/K' G� 4 u•r MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 20, 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL 6. 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve BRA Minutes of April 6, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the BRA Check Register dated April 16, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling $6,999.05. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE May 4, 1992 AGENDA ITEM HRA -II ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Officials Liability HRA Company Amount of Quote or Bid Scottsdale Insurance Company 1-. $ 4,982.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Scottsdale Insurance Company $ 4,982.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Dave Crowther of the Harris - Homeyer Agency secured this quote. Mr. Crowther indicated that he spoke with underwriters,from the St. Paul Company, Marinco and West World, Inca None of these companies felt they could be competitive and declined to quote. •� Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not within b' Kenneth Administration Depadraent hn Wal' , Finance Director land. City Manager COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 9:07 PM page 1 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12212 05/04/92 $33.00 BRANDENBURG, HEIDI HRA PARKING PERMIT RE 812 50TH STREET PARKING PERMI < *> $33.00* 12213 05/04/92 $2,061.96 BRW INC. ARCH FEE 65309 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH/ 05/04/92 $26.10 BRW INC. ARCH FEE 65303 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH/ 05/04/92 $564.87 BRW INC. ARCH FEE 65300 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH/ 05/04/92 $1,303.75 BRW INC. ARCH FEE 65173 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH/ < *> $3,956.68* 12214 05/04/92 $48.78 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE G HUGHES GRANDVIEW MISC < *> $48.78* 12215 05/04/92 $15.00 MADSEN JEROME M PARKING PERMIT REFUND 238 50TH STREET PARKING PERMI < *> $15.00* 12216 05/04/92 $3,021.00 SOUND ADVISE CONSULT SOUND SYSTEM 041392 CENTENNIAL LAK EQUIPMENT 455 < *> $3,021.00* 12217 05/04/92 $3,096.63 TOOLS BY OLSEN EQUIPMENT 4.2779 CENTENNIAL LAK EQUIPMENT 457 < *> $3,096.63* $10,171.09* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, APR-29, 1992, 9:08 PM page 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- - - - - -- --------------- -- FUND # 01 $10,171.09 $10,171.09" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 20, 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. TROOP 254 WEBELOS WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed members of Boy Scout Webelo Troop 254 from Katherine Curran /John Ireland Schools in Hopkins, who were working on citizen merit badges. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 6. 1992 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the Council Minutes of the regular meeting of April 6, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON DRAFT EDINA CODE: DRAFT SECTIONS 410 AND 475 REVIEWED Affidavits.of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Mayor Richards opened the third public hearing on the draft Edina City code by stating that Council during the last six months has been reviewing the draft code with the intention of holding a series of public hearings to allow input from residents prior to the adoption of the code in June, 1992. Certain sections of the code will be specifically focused upon at the hearings. Consideration will also be given to certain chapters after the sections are discussed. DRAFT SECTION 410 - BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL FIRE PREVENTION AND FIRE SUPPRESSING SPRINKLING SYSTEMS) Assistant Manager Hughes explained that draft Section 410 would adopt optional chapters of the Minnesota State Building Code and the Uniform Building Code. Chapter 55 which relates to membrane structures has been adopted. Staff would recommend adoption of two additional optional chapters: Chapter 1335 relating to floodproofing regulations, and Chapter 3808 relating to fire suppression systems. Fire Chief Paulfranz commented that information on optional Chapter 3808 was mailed to persons that could be adversely impacted. In addition, a meeting was held with representatives from Minneapolis Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA). Chapter 3808 deals with installation of automatic fire suppression (sprinkler) systems and would apply to new buildings and buildings where the occupancy classification has changed or the structure has been increased in size or floor area. The effect would be to transfer some of the increased costs for fire protection to those properties requiring increased protection. The Council questioned if Chapter 3808 would apply to a change of building ownership, if there would be a cost benefit for building expansion, and if the draft code as proposed would give the Council the authority to grant a variance from the requirement to install sprinkler systems. Chief Paulfranz clarified that a change of ownership of a building usually triggers a code compliance inspection. The existing building code is the standard used. Many of the requirements are advisory and some are mandatory. Any order issued under Chapter 3808 could be reviewed by the Building Construction Appeals Board. The board's decision would be acted upon by the State Building Code Division and could also be appealed to the City Council. Mayor Richards commented that, prior to final adoption of the City Code, he needed to know who has the final decision as to whether or not sprinkling systems are required to be installed if Chapter 3808 is adopted as it could be an unfair economic penalty in some cases. Ph.i:l— Engel, General Grrowth_Management Compan , testified that installation of fire sprinklers in commercial or office buildings is absolutely necessary for life safety. The sprinkler system cost today is the same as it was 20 years ago - $1.10 to $1.35 per square foot for new construction, $2.25 to $2.75 per square foot for existing structures with an adequate water service. Mr. Engel quoted from Buildings magazine "If you can afford to put carpet on the floor you can afford to put sprinklers in a new building." In most cases from a life safety standpoint you are looking at a two to five times penalty in insurance costs. Sprinklers pay for themselves in a relative short period of time. Additionally, the more sprinklered buildings the City has the more efficient the fire department can be in rendering service - it is a cost saving to the taxpayers. Member. Paulus asked if the proposed code goes far enough. Mr. Engel said.the draft code is standard in the industry and would give the City flexibility in dealing with the area of life safety. Member Paulus asked Attorney Gilligan if the City would be liable for a fire occurring in a building that was granted a variance by the Council from the requirement to install a sprinkler system. Attorney Gilligan said he would research the question and bring back an opinion. No further comment was heard. SECTION 475 - PARKING RAMPS Assistant Manager Hughes observed that Section 475 - Parking Ramps is a new section to the code and would require the following: - Ramps and structured parking over five years old would require an annual license. - Inspection and certification by qualified engineer would be required to obtain a license. In response to Member Rice, Assistant Manager Hughes said this would also apply to City ramps. A qualified engineer is defined as follows: 1. Registered by the state as a professional engineer in civil or structural engineering. 2. Demonstrated experience and expertise in parking ramp inspection. 3. Maintains professional liability insurance with a company authorized to do business in the state in the amount of not less than one million dollars. No public comment was heard on Section 475. CHAPTER 9 - LIQUOR Section 900 - Liquor and Wine The following changes have been made to the existing ordinance: - Elimination of the six month waiting period for a new business to obtain a 3.2 beer license. - Elimination of provisions addressed by State Law. - Clarification of temporary beer license requirements: 1. Thirty days between licenses. 2. No more than four licenses per location annually. 3. Three day maximum per license. Section 905 - Open House Parties The existing ordinance requirements apply only to adults who are present on the premises during a party. Requirements have been expanded to include juveniles as well. No public comment was heard on Chapter 9. CHAPTER 10 - MISDEMEANORS AND NUISANCES Section 1000 - Crimes and Forbidden Conduct The following changes have been made to the existing ordinance: - Antiquated provisions have been deleted. (Covered by statute) - New provisions: 1. Terroristic threats. (Penalty for.threats of harm.) 2. Fraudulent identification. (Returning merchandise for cash.) Section 1015 - Hoax. Obscene or Annoying Telephone Calls The following provision has been,added to the existing ordinance: - Includes 911 emergency calls. Section 1040 - Noises Disturbing the Public Peace The following changes have been made to the existing ordinance: - Adoption of PCA definition of daytime and nighttime hours. (Daytime hours changed to begin at 7:00 A.M.) - Exemption for snow removal from private property within 24 hours of a snowfall exceeding four inches in depth. Section 1050- Maintenance of Vegetation The following substantial revisions have been made to the existing ordinance: - Weeds and grasses must not exceed 10 inches in height. (Present requirement is 12 inches.) - Ornamental grasses and groundcovers must observe setbacks and be mowed once during growing season. (Includes crown vetch and similar vegetation.) Section 1055 - Control and Prevention of Shade Tree Diseases The following provision has been added to the existing ordinance as directed by Council: - Cost of removal of diseased boulevard trees to be paid by homeowner. Donna Nye, 5821 Zenith Avenue So., spoke to Section 1035 - General Nuisances. She explained she had submitted a letter and photographs regarding overfeeding of birds by a neighbor and the mess it creates. Her letter had petitioned the Council to enact and enforce an ordinance in zoned residential areas which would prohibit ground feeding of birds and wild animals and which would restrict the size and number of bird feeders per square feet of property. Ms. Nye told Council that Sanitarian Velde had visited the neighbor and told her to only fill the bird feeders and to refrain from spreading food on the ground. The neighbor has not complied. David Nye said an ordinance that would prohibit ground feeding would substantially reduce the problem. It was noted that a court ruled against a northern suburb in a case against a resident for overfeeding of geese on a lake shore. Wallace Lilja, 6933 Moccasin Valley Road, said he was concerned about lack of maintenance of residential properties in the City. He asked if the City could enforce compliance for reasonable maintenance of residential property from both a health and aesthetics point of view. He said he is not trying to create a Disneyland Edina but felt a spectrum of acceptability should be agreed upon. Mayor Richards answered that the Council has discussed the need for an inspection process when properties are sold, for example. There has been no consensus that government should involve itself in that kind of activity, (condition of exterior paint or other physical elements) but rather that the market place should make those type of decisions.' He added that the City does have ordinances that deal with refuse and garbage. Mr. Lilja interjected that the problem is not with properties up for sale but lack of maintenance on a continuing basis. Member Smith elaborated that when a lawn is not maintained or weeds are allowed to grow, the City must mow and bill the owner or assess the property. Tax money is used to maintain the City's standard. If expanded to include shrubbery trimming, roofs, siding, etc., it would mean additional expending of public funds for aesthetics. Member Rice commented that this is similar to the ground cover issue that was before Council recently. In that case legal counsel had advised that it would be difficult to regulate such activity. Member Paulus mentioned that many public dollars have been spent in trying to defend and define the term "nuisance ". The court system has defended a resident's right that they cannot be told to maintain their property to any particular standard unless it becomes a health concern. Why create an ordinance that could not be upheld in a court of law. She reminded Council that every ordinance created by the City must be in line with federal laws and standards. No further public comment was heard on Chapter 10. CHAPTER 11 - PUBLIC UTILITIES Section 1100 - Sanitary Sewer and Water System The following provision has been added to the existing ordinance: - Hearing process prior to termination of water service. Section 1105 - Connection Charges The following change has been made to the existing ordinance: - Flat rate connection charges for sewer and water. No public comment was heard on Chapter 11. Mayor Richards then declared the public hearing closed. The Council briefly discussed the issue of excessive /ground feeding of birds and, in specific, the problem on Zenith Avenue. Member Kelly made a motion directing staff to contact the Zenith Avenue residents involved in an attempt to resolve the problem through West Suburban Mediation Services. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PRELIMINARY REZONING R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT TO R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING GRANTED FOR LOT 3. BLOCK 1. MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 8TH ADDITION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner' Planner Larsen explained that the subject property, Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition, is a vacant 20,000 square foot lot which is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The proponents have petitioned to have the lot rezoned to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. The subject lot is part of a five lot subdivision approved in 1977. Lots 1, 2, and 3 remain vacant. At the time of subdivision, a house existed on Lot 5 and Lot 4 has since been developed as a double bungalow. Lots 1, 2, and 4 are zoned R -2 and Lots 3 and 5 are zoned R -1. The Comprehensive Plan designates this lot and adjacent lots fronting on McCauley Trail as Low Density Attached Residential; R -2 zoning is consistent with that designation. The Zoning Ordinance would require a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet for an R -2 lot. The subject lot conforms to these requirements. Access to the subject lot was originally provided from McCauley Terrace because of the steep grade along McCauley Trail. Serving two units from this narrow strip is somewhat problematic. The proponents have submitted a conceptual development plan which would serve one unit from McCauley Trail and the other from McCauley Terrace. Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as it is consistent with the zoning status of adjacent properties and with the Comprehensive Plan. If grade problems can be handled, avoiding the shared driveway is desirable. The Planning Commission considered the rezoning request on April 1, 1992, and recommended approval. The Commission also recommended that one unit.be accessed from McCauley Trail and the other unit be accessed from McCauley Terrace. Presentation for Proponent Dennis McCauley, said he was speaking on behalf of his mother, Betty McCauley, proponent who resides on Lot 5. When the subdivision was originally platted the design for Lot 3 appeared to be more acceptable for a single dwelling home. It was left zoned as R -1 until such time as a potential purchaser desired to construct a double bungalow. Public Comment Dennis Chase, 6455 McCauley Trail, said he resided on Lot 4. He stated he did not object to the rezoning, but was concerned that the large boulder wall retaining his property could be displaced by the construction of a double unit on Lot 3. He said he was also concerned that his property may develop surface water drainage problems. He suggested that egress from both units be to McCauley Terrace because of the topography and the traffic on McCauley Trail. In conclusion Mr. Chase said he would like some assurance that any damages to his property would be taken care of. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards commented that the City does not function as a guarantor and could not use public moneys for that purpose. Attorney Gilligan opined that if his property was damaged as a result of the construction, Mr. Chase would have just cause for a claim against the property owner or contractor. Member Rice said he has no problem with the land use but questioned what could be physically built on the lot because of the topography. Planner Larsen pointed out that when a building permit is applied for staff will review the plans for code compliance. Answering Member Kelly, Planner Larsen said that ingress /egress from the property could not be a condition for the rezoning. Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A46 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A46 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION REVERSED - VARIANCE GRANTED FOR SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCES - LOT 30. BLACK 10 COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION (4609 BRUCE AVENUE) Presentation by Planner Assistant Planner Aaker advised that the subject property, located at 4609 Bruce Avenue, is a two story colonial with an attached two car ,garage in the rear yard area. A graphic was presented illustrating the existing building footprint, concrete drive, fence and oak tree in the rear yard. The house is situated on a narrow 50 foot lot, and is non - conforming in terms of the north sideyard setback. Currently the home is set back 4.75 feet along the north property boundary, The ordinance requires a minimum .5 yard setback. The owners, Bruce and Laura Zimmerman, are.proposing to convert the existing side loading garage located in the rear yard into a family room, dinette, mudroom and half -bath, to add a master suite with bathroom above the converted garge and to construct a new attached two car garage to the south of the remodeled existing garage. Originally, the plans called for a deck which has now been omitted as it would require a variance. In addition, the original plans proposed a storage area above the new garage which has also been omitted. To accomplish the proposal as modified would require a 2.25 foot north sideyard setback variance for the second story addition and a 2 foot south sideyard setback variance. for the attached garage. The proponents desire to preserve a bur oak tree in the rear yard area, the premise for the location of the new attached two car garage. In addition to preserving a mature tree, the proposal would also provide open space in the rear yard area. A detached garage could be constructed in the rear yard area that would meet ordinance requirements. Staff believes the proposed addition is a logical extension of the home based on the following findings: 1) The north setback of the home is currently non - conforming. 2) The garage structure to be converted is an existing structure producing less visual impact than the 'introduction of a completely new structure in the rear yard., 3) The second story master bedroom seems to be a logical extension of the existing floor plan. 4) The proposed new attached garage arrangement would allow the preservation of an oak tree. 5) The attached garage has been reduced in size from original plans in order to be more conforming to ordinance requirements. 6) The new south facing garage wall angles away from the south property boundary so only the southwest corner of the garage will be three feet from the south lot line. 7) Adjacent neighbors support the variance.. 8) Similar variances have been approved in the past for properties along Bruce, Casco and Arden Avenues in the Country Club District. On April 2, 1992, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments heard and denied the request for variances based on lack of demonstrated hardship. The proponents have appealed the Board's decision to the Council. Presentation by Proponent Bruce Zimmerman, proponent, said that the plan as originally submitted to the Board of Appeals is a well thought out and rational plan for the proposed expansion to their home. The hardship is based in part in that the house was initially built on a non - conforming basis. Further, that in order to preserve the 150 year old bur oak tree and to conform to ordinance requirements for a two car garage necessitates the south setback variance. To maintain the integrity of the house lines the architect has recommended that the north wall be kept flush with the balance of the house. They also wish to extend the existing garage by addition of a second story. He concluded that they have the support of the adjoining neighbors in terms of maintaining the back yard open space. Laura Zimmerman commented that the Board of Appeals was concerned about light exposure for the neighbor to the north and the architect has advised that two feet would not make a difference in the neighbor's vantage point. Public Comment Mike Casserly, 4611 Bruce Avenue South, commented that he disagreed with the Board of Appeals' decision to deny the variances. He submitted that all residents in the area living on 50 foot lots have a hardship when attempting to expand living space that is more appropriate to today's life style. He noted that they received a variance about 12 years ago to add an addition to their home. He said the plan as proposed, which leaves the back yard space open, is preferable to a detached garage in the rear and that it will be a nice enhancement for the property. It was noted that letters in support of the proposal have been received from Michael and Beverly Casserly, 4611 Bruce Avenue South, and Joyce L. Thomas, 4607 Bruce Avenue. Regarding the bur oak, Tom Horwath, Consultant City Forester, opined "it is a tree of such grandeur that it benefits not only your lot, but also aesthetically enhances the neighborhood immediately surrounding it." Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards asked for a summary of the Board's decision to deny the variances. Associate Planner Aaker said Board comments included the following: 1) Board should not be held hostage by a tree even though worth saving; 2) Potential for modifications to the design; 3) A jog in the master bedroom in the rear yard portion of the addition would enhance the aesthetics. There was no consensus by the Board regarding an appropriate design solution for the lot and they encouraged the proponents to bring the matter to Council. Mayor Richards commented that he did not feel a hardship exists for granting the variances, however slight they might be. Member Paulus commented that there are inconsistencies in the Board's report. From a historical standpoint the,Heritage Preservation Board has a concern regarding front loading garages. A suggestion was made to incorporate a hip roof to minimize the impact. The issue of massing was also raised. When the Council attempted to define massing it was impossible. A new detached garage would destroy existing green space and add mass. She commented that she did not agree with the Board's decision and would support the variances as requested. Member Smith pointed out that the neighborhood is full of variances on sideyard setbacks. He suggested staff leadership be provided for the Board when considering variance requests in the Country Club area. Further, that he sees the proposal as a variance on the south side for the garage and a continuation of an existing structure on the north. Member Rice observed that he is still troubled by the massing issue but would support the request for the slight variances. Member Kelly commented that upon examination of the property she felt that the proposed addition would be an improvement. Mayor Richards said he was bothered by the term "slight variances ". He recalled that there was strong opposition by the neighbors to the addition to the home on Drexel Avenue which required no variances whatsoever. He concurred that government should not legislate massing but that the ordinance requirements for setbacks should be maintained as no hardship has been demonstrated. Member Rice made a motion to grant the 2.25 foot sideyard setback variance and the 2.0 foot south sideyard setback variance for 4609 Bruce Avenue, based on the findings outlined by staff. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith Nays: Richards (No hardship demonstrated.) Variances granted. *BID'AWARDED FOR MILL POND WEED HARVESTING Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Mill Pond deed harvesting to recommended low bidder, Midwest Aqua Care, at $6,080.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BIDS REJECTED FOR ASPHALT ROLLER: TO BE RE -BID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to reject all bids for an asphalt roller and to re -bid the equipment. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 1992 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman briefly reviewed the discussion that occurred at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting on April 14, 1992. Member Smith made a motion to approve the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 14, 1992, with no requests for action in Section A and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY.LEASE REQUEST CONTINUED TO 5/4/92 Engineer Hoffman explained that the request from Cemstone Products Company to lease City property at I- 494 /County Road 18 to set up a concrete plant operation had been continued from April 6, 1992. Cemstone has been awarded the sub - contract for concrete to construct the two mile stretch of the Bloomington ferry bridge over the next three years. At Council's request, Cemstone has submitted additional information as to operation, water and electricity, and environmental data, together with a site plan and photo of a typical plant layout. The site plan is laid out so that the pad location is tucked into an area shielded by trees. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and has approved a grading permit. Staff reviewed the preliminary proposal and felt it had merit because the City would be left with a usable area for concrete or asphalt recycling of City materials or other possible recycling or composting uses. One of the staff concerns has been the ever - increasing costs for disposal of construction materials and the need to recycle. Current costs for disposal of concrete and bituminous to a recycling area out of the City is $10,000 per year. Currently, the City is removing black dirt as needed from the west end of the site and this results in approximately $5,000 savings per year without having to purchase outside materials. The site would work until some other use of the property is developed. The Council Members raised the following questions: 1) Could the plant be seen from the 16th tee of Braemar Golf Course; 2) Could a cancellation provision be added to the lease agreement if dust or noise impacts the golf course; 2) Hours of operation; 4) Has Cemstone been awarded the contract for the bridge; 5) What does the City get upon completion of the bridge project; 6) Ingress /egress to the site, 7) Responsibility for any environmental problems resulting from the plant operation, and 8) Lease rent. Engineer Hoffman answered that the Cemstone site would be approximately 900 feet from the golf course. Bloomington residents may be impacted visually because of their higher elevation. When trees are leafed out the view of the plant would be minimal. The entrance /exit to the site would be via the West 78th Street frontage road (MNDOT right of way) to a City cul -de -sac. Repair of the entrance road would be the responsibility of Cemstone during the leasing period. Repair of the cul -de -sac would be the responsibility of the City after the three years. Tim Becken, Cemstone Products Company, informed Council that they have done environmental studies on all Cemstone facilities. They have placed plants in residential areas within 600 feet of homes, and have not had a problem with dust or noise. They would be willing to include a cancellation provision in the lease if dust or noise impacts the golf course. He said noise generated from a concrete plant is mostly from trucks running. Hours of operation would be 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. weekdays, reserving the right to work on an occasional Saturday with a three week's advance notice. Gemstone has been awarded the sub - contract for the bridge project. Set -up costs for Gemstone are estimated at $39,000. In summary, the City would receive a very usable site easily accessible by City vehicles, plus $2,000 in water revenues and $5,000 per year of rent. Considerable discussion followed regarding terms to be included in the lease agreement, bonding and negotiation of the rental fee. Member Kelly made a motion for conceptual approval for use of City land by Cemstone Products Company for a portable concrete plant operation, subject to Council approval of a lease agreement on May 4, 1992, terms and conditions thereof to be negotiated by the Mayor, Manager, Engineer, City Attorney and representatives of Cemstone Products. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Rice Motion carried. CODIFICATION WORK SESSION SET FOR 5111/92 After brief discussion, the Council concurred that an additional codification work session would be necessary. Member Paulus made a motion setting May 11, 1992, at 7:00 P.M. for a codification work session. Member Rice seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 15, 1992, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $249,070.06; CDBG $1,000.00; Cable $9,159.51; Working Capital Fund $2,270.42; Art Center $1,613.64; Capitol Fund $606.94; Pool $123.28; Golf Course $20,856.61; Arena $1,517.06; Gun Range $48.20; Edinborough Park $25,913.44; Utilities $19,001.78; Storm Sewer $1,948.03; Liquor Dispensary $98,245.17; Construction Fund $17,293.10; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $2,004.37; TOTAL $450,671.61; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 31, 1992, and consisting of 14 pages: General Fund $172,539.29; Communications $18,338.21; Recreation Center fund $775.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $190,201.68;. Construction Fund $2,772.20; TOTAL $384,626.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M. City Clerk SECTION 1045. COMMERCIAL USAGE VEHICLES o DESIGNED OR MODIFIED FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE OR DEMOLITION o TRACTORS o TOWED EQUIPMENT EXCEPT R.V.'S o SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT o EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT o TRUCKS, VANS, AND PICKUPS EXCEEDING 3/4 TON CARRYING CAPACITY RECREATIONAL VEHICLES o CAMPERS o PICKUPS WITH CAMPERS OR TOPPERS o MOBILE HOMES o ATV'S o MARINE CRAFTS o CAMPING TRAILERS o SNOWMOBILES o TRAILERS USED TO TRANSPORT R.V.'S PERMITTED PARKING LOCATIONS o COMMERCIAL USAGE VEHICLES, INOPERABLE VEHICLES, UNMOUNTED CAMPERS AND TOPPERS MAY BE PARKED OR STORED ONLY WITHIN A GARAGE OR BUILDING o R.V.'S MAY BE PARKED OR STORED IN A GARAGE OR BUILDING, OR MAY BE PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY BUT NOT FOR MORE THAN 48 HOURS o ALL OTHER VEHICLES MAY BE PARKED OR STORED IN A GARAGE OR BUILDING OR MAY BE PARKED OR STORED IN THE DRIVEWAY o VEHICLES PARKED IN DRIVEWAY MUST NOT BE WITHIN 15 FEET OF THE STREET AND FIVE FEET OF THE SIDE LOT LINE SPECIAL PERMIT PROCESS RETAINED FROM EXISTING ORDINANCE - QUESTIONS - IS A PICKUP WITH A TOPPER -AN R.V.? YES MAY I PARK MY R.V. OUTDOORS IF I USE IT FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES? YES, AS ALONG AS IT IS USED AT LEAST EVERY 48 HOURS DOES THE ORDINANCE PROHIBIT PARKING MY CAR OR R.V. ON . THE STREET? NO, HOWEVER, OTHER ORDINANCES LIMIT ON- STREET PARKING TO SIX HOURS ARE EXISTING R.V.'S GRANDFATHERED? NO IS THERE A LIMITATION ON THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT MAY BE PARKED OR STORED? NO ARE NON - MOTORIZED BOATS INCLUDED AS R.V.'S? YES CHAPTER 12 SECTION 1200 - USE & MAINTENANCE OF STREETS o SNOW STORAGE ON BOULEVARDS o SNOW REMOVAL FROM WALKS INCREASED FROM 12 HOURS TO 48 HOURS SECTION 1205 - CURB CUTS o PERMIT REQUIRED FOR NEW DRIVEWAY CUTS TO STREETS SECTION 1230 - CONDUCT IN PUBLIC PLACES o NON - INTOXICATING BEER & WINE MAY BE SERVED AT INDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES AND VAN VALKENBURG PARK o VEHICLES MAY NOT BE DISPLAYED FOR SALE IN PUBLIC PLACES o FEEDING OF WILDLIFE PROHIBITED IN PUBLIC AREAS CHAPTER 13 SECTION 1300 - REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES o HAULERS MUST PROVIDE VOLUME BASED FEES SECTION 1310 - PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS o ELIMINATES LICENSING REQUIREMENT FOR .PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS o PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS MUST OBSERVE PLACARD SECTION 1315 - ADVERTISING MATERIAL o PROHIBITS LEAVING ADVERTISING MATERIAL ON PLACARDED PROPERTIES o EXCLUDES CIRCULARS LIKE EDINA SUN FROM THE REQUIREMENT SECTION 1325 - TOBACCO o SMOKELESS TOBACCO INCLUDED SECTION 1330 AND SECTION 1430 - TAXICABS o ELIMINATES LICENSING BY EDINA o CABS AND CAB DRIVERS MUST DISPLAY LICENSE ISSUED BY BLOOMINGTON, RICHFIELD, ST. LOUIS PARK, OR MAC CHAPTER 14 SECTION 1400 - TRAFFIC o . UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION o UNATTENDED CHILDREN IN CAR SECTION 1420 - MOTOR BICYCLES - DELETED SECTION 1435 - SNOWMOBILES AND ATV'S o PERMITS THE POLICE CHIEF TO ISSUE PERMIT FOR DISABLED PERSONS USE OF ATV CODE COMMENTS AGENDA ITEM II.A Russell F. Nelson 7117 West Shore Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 -4040 (612) 922 -9265 April 29, 1992 City of Edina Attn: City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed change for Recreational Vehicle Parking Dear Council: I would like to express my concern regarding the proposed changes in the recreational vehicle parking regulations. The proposed changes are a radical change from the current regulations and are unnecessary. When I bought my home in Edina I checked with the city about the regulations concerning the parking of recreational vehicles in the city. Based upon the current law, I purchased my home. I may not have bought my home had the new proposal been in effect. Why make a change when the existing laws are good enough? In my view these are the benefits and problems: Benefits - The city will look nicer if the old, beat up, junky vehicles are regulated off peoples property. Problems - There is an environmental problem. If most RVs must be stored off site, there will be countless trips to store and retrieve the units. Thousands of gallons of gasoline will have to be burned in this procedure. What a waste. - There is an economic problem. First, the RV owner will have to pay for a permit. Secondly, a storage cost for the RV will be incurred on a periodic basis. Thirdly, there will be tremendous cost for gasoline to drive back and forth to get the RVs. Finally, the.city will incur costs to pay the permitting committee. City of Edina -2- April 29, 1992 - There is an inconsistency within the city. RVs provide an opportunity for quality family time. The city at the community center and in the public schools encourage quality family time. Now the city is trying to make it difficult to have more frequent family recreational time (that they are trying to encourage). It will be very time consuming storing and retrieving RVs because storage locations are so far away. The spontaneous usage of RVs will be virtually impossible. This situation is a terrible inconsistency. - The quality of life will decrease. We pride ourselves that we have a great quality of life in Minnesota. Part of this is the easy access to recreational pursuits. The proposed RV parking laws will decrease our opportunity for certain amounts of recreation, and, therefore, our quality of life will suffer. - There is no provision in the proposal for the "grandfathering" of existing parking practices. Nor is there and explanation of the criteria on how permits would be granted. This proposal is too vague in these important areas. This proposal will pit neighbor against neighbor. Neighborhood tensions could (and probably would) rise because of the permitting process. I don't like the barking of a dog behind my house but I put up with it to keep good neighbor relations. I sympathize with the few folks who have beat -up, old RVs and boats permanently parked next door. I sympathize with the few folks that have rusty cars parked next door. But I am pro - family and I am for maintaining and increasing the access and availability to positive family recreational activities. This new proposal is anti - family and pro- aesthetics. I'll take the pro - family position any day. Please vote pro - family and vote against this proposal. Very truly.yours, Russell F. Nelson CODE COMMENTS AGENDA ITEM II.A April 29, 1992 City Counsel City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Recreational Vehicle Permit Proposal Dear Counsel Members: As a long time resident of this City, I would object to a proposal that I must get a permit if I ever keep my 17 foot speedboat on a trailer in my driveway for more than 48 hours. I store my boat every winter. However, it is not always possible to immediately place it in storage or immediately go to the lake when I remove it from storage. Although having the boat in the driveway is an inconvenience to me, I often have it in the driveway for a week both in the spring and the fall. It would be a great inconvenience for me to obtain a permit or solicit the approval of my neighbors in order to do this. Please do not impose restrictions on the ability to have a boat in a residential driveway during the boating season. Thank you. Very truly yours, 1 -4- --- �tL Harold J/ agley 7113 G19u ester Ave. Edina, MN 55425 AGENDA NO. II.A. May 9, 1992 To: The Edina City Council From: Karn Hill Re: Long term parking of Recreational vehicles etc. in residential neighborhoods. It is my understanding that the Council will be considering the above issue at tonight's Council meeting. I would like to express the Nish that recreational vehicles, trucks, large boats and the like be banned from long term parking on residential lots. They are not in keeping with the residential ambience of our Edina neighborhoods. Tha k you. 444 Karn Ann Hill i i. >1 I � REPORT /RECOMMENDATION .._ntlnM• To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item .? • A. From: Craig Larsen Consent F I Information Only j Date: May 4, 1992 Mgr. Recommends U To HRA Subject: Z-92-1, R-1, Single To Council Dwelling Unit Dist. to R-2, Double Action ❑ Motion Dwelling Unit Dist.! �-- Lot 8, Block 1 , Mc- Resolution Cauley Heights 8th 'i Addition. r— I X, Ordinance �! Discussion Recommendation: Grant 2nd Reading on Rezoning from R -1 to R -2. Info /Background First reading of the proposed rezoning was granted by the City Council at their April 20, 1992, meeting. that it would be difficult to regulate such activity. Member Npaulus mentioned that many public dollars have been spent in trying to defend a define the term "nuisance ". The court s tem has defended a resident's fight that they cannot be told to main in their property to any particular s ndard� unless it becomes a health oncern. Why create an ordinance that could not a upheld in a court of law. a reminded Council that every ordinance create by the City must be in l' a with federal laws and standards. No further public c mment was heard on C pter 10. The following provision has,\been/added.to the existing ordinance: - Hearing process prio, o termination of water service. Section 1105 - Connection Char s The following change has en ma\ to the existing ordinance: - Flat rate conne ion charge for sewer and water. No public comment was eard on Chapte \ Mayor Richards then declared the public hearing clos The Council briefly discussed the issue of excessive /ground feeding of birds and, in specific, She problem on Zenith Avenue. Member Kelly made a motion directing staff to coweact the Zenith Avenue residents involved in an attempt to resolve the problem/through West Suburban Mediation Services,. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. `J\(XjRELIHMURY REZONING R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT TO R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING GRANTED FOR \ LOT 3. BLOCK 1. MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 8TH ADDITION Affidavits of Notice were Y \\ - presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained that the subject property, Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition, is a vacant 20,000 square foot lot which is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The proponents have petitioned to have the lot rezoned to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. The subject lot is part of a five lot subdivision approved in 1977. Lots 1, 2, and 3 remain vacant. At the time of subdivision, a house existed on Lot 5 and Lot 4 has since been developed as a double bungalow. Lots 1, 2, and 4 are zoned R -2 and Lots 3 and 5 are zoned R -1. The Comprehensive Plan designates this lot and adjacent lots fronting on McCauley Trail as Low Density Attached Residential; R -2 zoning is consistent with that designation. The Zoning Ordinance would.require a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet for an R -2 lot. The subject lot conforms to these requirements. Access to the subject lot was originally provided from McCauley Terrace because of the steep grade along McCauley Trail. Serving two units from this narrow strip is somewhat problematic. The proponents have submitted a conceptual development plan which would serve one unit from McCauley Trail and the other from McCauley Terrace. Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as it is consistent with the zoning status of adjacent properties and with the Comprehensive Plan. If grade problems can be handled, avoiding the shared driveway is desirable. The Planning Commission considered the rezoning request on April 1, 1992,. and recommended approval. The Commission also recommended that one unit be accessed from McCauley Trail and the other unit be accessed from McCauley Terrace. Presentation for Proponent Dennis McCauley, said he was speaking on behalf of his mother, Betty McCauley, proponent who resides on Lot 5. When the subdivision was originally platted the design for Lot 3 appeared to be more acceptable for a single dwelling home. It was left zoned as R -1 until such time as a potential purchaser desired to construct a double bungalow. Public Comment Dennis Chase, 6455 McCauley Trail,' said he resided on Lot 4. He stated he did not object to the rezoning, but was concerned that the large boulder wall retaining his property could be displaced by the construction of a. double unit on Lot 3. He said he was also concerned that his property may develop surface water drainage problems. He suggested that egress from both units be to McCauley Terrace because of the topography and the traffic on McCauley Trail. In conclusion Mr. Chase said he would like some assurance that any damages to his property would be taken care of. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards commented that the City does not function as a guarantor and could not use public moneys for that purpose. Attorney Gilligan opined that if his property was damaged as a result of the construction, Mr. Chase would have just cause for a claim against the property owner or contractor. Member Rice said he has no problem with the land use but questioned what could be physically built on the lot because of the topography. Planner Larsen pointed out that when a building permit is applied for staff will review the plans for code compliance. Answering Member Kelly, Planner Larsen said that ingress /egress from the property could not be a condition for the rezoning. Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A46 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A46 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION REVERSED - VARIANCE GRANTED FOR SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCES - LOT 30 BLOCK 10 COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION (4609 BRUCE AVENUE) Presentation by Planner Assistant Planner Aaker advised that the subject property, located at 4609 Bruce Avenue, is a two story colonial with an attached two car garage in the rear yard area. A graphic was presented illustrating the existing building footprint, concrete drive, fence and oak tree in the rear yard. The house is situated on a narrow 50 foot lot, and is non - conforming in terms of the north sideyard setback. Currently the home is set back 4.75 feet along the north property boundary, The ordinance requires -a minimum 5 yard setback. A=11�530 a= 40- I` M 0 M h �•' ti� Oo 36 �p938, �ti\O �2 0 '6 d ':Sao o fah rte, N CZC v •lam ° EDv "O � y 7�i•• �o 0 0oO�•'E. 74 opb SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 150 200 250 W a O' �O Z� 00061 ri O .. ... •DPI `\ i :.. S 9po4 r'�•o 2 Ip .F 336 9 -47o Y . ;.... ry' F300 4T,E- I` M 0 M h �•' ti� Oo 36 �p938, �ti\O �2 0 '6 d ':Sao o fah rte, N CZC v •lam ° EDv "O � y 7�i•• �o 0 0oO�•'E. 74 opb SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 150 200 250 W a O' �O Z� 00061 ri .1 4 O e} .�', n O C:.q.fMN� j REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: May 4, 1992 Subject: Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision - Lot Coverage and Sid( Street Setback Variance. Andrew MacPhail - 5236 Brookview Avenue. Recommendation: Agenda Item # T T T . B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends F7 To HRA Affirm decision of the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Info /Background At their February 6, 1992, meeting, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments heard Andrew and Lark MacPhails request for a 2% lot coverage variance and an additional 1 foot side street setback variance to allow an addition to the back of their home. The board discussed the addition and agreed that visually the addition would not impact the neighborhood to a significant degree. The board concluded however, that at present the house and detached garage are large with regard to the size of the lot and that a variance had already been granted to exceed the maximum lot coverage requirements. The board denied the request on a-3 to 1 vote. The proposal has been appealed to be heard by the City Council for final action. Enclosed for council review are the following items. 1. Minutes of the February 6, 1992, Board of Appeals meeting. 2. Staff report and attachments. To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution C Ordinance ❑ Discussion Affirm decision of the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Info /Background At their February 6, 1992, meeting, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments heard Andrew and Lark MacPhails request for a 2% lot coverage variance and an additional 1 foot side street setback variance to allow an addition to the back of their home. The board discussed the addition and agreed that visually the addition would not impact the neighborhood to a significant degree. The board concluded however, that at present the house and detached garage are large with regard to the size of the lot and that a variance had already been granted to exceed the maximum lot coverage requirements. The board denied the request on a-3 to 1 vote. The proposal has been appealed to be heard by the City Council for final action. Enclosed for council review are the following items. 1. Minutes of the February 6, 1992, Board of Appeals meeting. 2. Staff report and attachments. B -92 -3 Andrew B. MacPhail 5236 Brookview Avenue Lot 5, Block R, South Harriet Park _ Request: A 2% lot coverage variance and an additional l foot side street setback variance Ms. Aaker presented her staff report noting the subject property is a single family home located on the corner of 53rd Street and Brookview Avenue. She added applicants are hoping to add a small eating area, mudroom, bay window seat, and half bath addition to the rear of their home. Ms. Aaker explained the proponents state that the addition although modest in size, would go a long way towards accommodating their growing family needs and would be preferable to the purchase of a larger home in a different neighborhood. Ms. Aaker pointed out that in the past this property received approval for two variances. -Ms. Aaker concluded that based on lack of demonstrated hardship, staff cannot support approval of the request. Mr. Olson asked Ms. Aaker what the lot coverage is at present. Ms. Aaker responded at present the lot coverage is 30.8 %. Mr. Goldstein of 5300 Brookview Avenue, told the Board he agrees the design of the present house doesn't work efficiently for a growing family. He added the MacPhail's are good neighbors who beautifully maintain their home and are an asset to the neighborhood and community. He concluded that the variance should be granted thereby allowing a growing family to remain in their home. Mr. MacPhail addressed the Board informing them as a family they have a problem with the interior layout of the house, and performing the basic everyday household chores. He explained the kitchen is very small and the side door opens directly into the kitchen. Mr. MacPhail pointed out the opening and closing of the door in the winter with small children playing on the kitchen floor causes concern. He concluded he understands the position of the board, stating this addition would allow them to remain in the home and their neighborhood. Mrs. MacPhail explained that the previous variances were granted and the addition of a 2nd. floor bathroom added before they purchased the home. She said in her opinion, the proposed addition would not negatively impact the neighborhood, and would create a much more workable kitchen, with the mudroom providing a new entry 3 and exit for her family. Mr. Olson asked Ms. Aaker if in her opinion, the proposed addition would have a negative impact on the neighborhood. Ms. - Aaker -stated visually the proposed addition would- not have an impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Olson stated that he believes the proposal has merit, stating in his opinion, it is important to upgrade older homes within the City allowing the homeowners to remain in their homes and neighborhoods. Mr. Palmer stated he knows the area well, pointing out the house at present is large, and already exceeds the City's lot coverage requirement. He added that while he sympathizes with the proponents this lot appears to be developed at maximum, and he can find no hardship to grant the variance request. A discussion ensued between members of the board. Mr. Olson moved to approve the variance request. There was no second; motion failed. Mr. Johnson moved to deny the variance request. Mrs. Faust seconded the motion. Ayes;.Palmer, Faust, Johnson, Nays, Olson. Motion to. deny was approved. Mr. Palmer told Mr: and Mrs. MacPhail they have the right to appeal the decision of the Board to the City Council. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. MaMPA ,* i;�kie Hoogenakke 4 LOCATION MAP 5113 - -�S030 His / 5117 \ 5105 __ son \ 5027 5029 5l0I ' 5l0e l 15!!7 1 10 t— — 5039 r5f09 5112 ` 5121. 11000951E 1 VIQ' 1 513! sin 5119 5112 !1 5133 1131 1129 1125 1121 5291 5200 I sm 5200 f—� —, 15211 5213 5212 5216 5217 5219 5217 5n0 \ 522! 5229 : 5221 5221 F— — I5237 Szte 522 5227 5224 5211 f 1 5233 �_ 5239 I 1 \ 5215 5234 5237 — � 5210, �5j 1 1- s399 Si 5301 5300 5301 r —5300 5301 I - WS 5m 530. X06 530, 5309 530e I 5307 5309 1 5311 rsm rS3i3 2 F 5313 5312 5313 5319 �� 9 5312 1 5317 j 5319 5325 5324 ss 5325 5316 —i 5320 5331 532!1 si31 5320 . W 5325 —� 4 1 I ` -i 1_rm_ I 533¢ I 1 5337 i 532 I I VARIANCE NUMBER B -92 -3 LOCATION 5236 Brookview Avenue 5119 5111 sill r5125 _ 5113 5120 I 1 5129 5115 5124 5131 :5117 51M 5137 5201 I 4207 � L 5209 5311 5309 5313 5321 REQUEST A 2% lot coverage variance and an additional 1 foot sidestreet setback variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5217 6221 st 5 5 5311 5309 5313 5321 REQUEST A 2% lot coverage variance and an additional 1 foot sidestreet setback variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 6, 1992 B -92 -3 Andrew B. MacPhail 5236 Brookview Avenue Lot 5, Block R, South Harriet Park Request: A 2% lot coverage variance and an additional 1 foot side street setback variance Background The subject property is a single family home located on the corner of 53rd Street and Brookview Avenue. Applicants are hoping to add a small eating area, mudroom, bay window seat, and half bath addition to the rear of their home. The proponents state that the addition although modest in size, would go a long way towards accommodating their growing family needs and would be preferable to the purchase of a larger home in a different neighborhood. Issues /Analysis It should be noted that there have been two variance hearings in the past regarding expansion of the home. 1977 Case: B -77 -39 A 9 foot side street setback variance was approved in 1977 to allow the attached one and one -half car garage to be converted into a family room and to allow the addition of a 22 x 24 foot detached garage in the rear yard. The new garage was located 11 feet from West 53rd Street instead of the required 20 feet. The variance was approved because the new garage replaced an old non- conforming garage. It was determined that the new garage would relate better to the neighborhood an the alternate conforming location. 1982 Case: B -82 -37 A 5.8% lot coverage variance and a 10 foot side street setback variance was approved in 1982. The addition included two new bedrooms above the existing kitchen and dining room and an addition to the sun porch in the front of the house. The lot coverage and side street setback variance were approved due to the unusual circumstances created by the pie- shaped lot and angular relationship to the street. It was also determined that the increased lot coverage appeared to be consistent with the neighborhood. A 5.8% lot coverage variance was required because in 1982 lot coverage was limited to 25 %, applicable to all R -1 lots. Current ordinance allows 30% lot coverage for lots less than 9,000 square feet but not to exceed 2,250 square feet. The current request would require the. approval of a additional 2% increase in lot coverage to allow a total of 32.8% lot coverage. The request also requires a 1 foot side street setback variance, (in addition to the 10 foot side street setback variance approved in 1977). While staff sympathizes with the applicant and believes that the addition is both modest and a logical extension of the house, staff is unable to identify a hardship or special circumstances to allow approval of the variance. Conclusion /Recommendation Based on lack of demonstrated hardship, staff cannot support approval of the request. CITY OF EDINA Application for: [ I LOT DIVISION [ ] REZONING [ %�] VARIANCE [ l PLAT Proposed Name - PLANNING DEPARTMENT Case Number Date Fee Paid 4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET . EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 (61 2) 927.8861 [ ] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [ ] FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN [ ] PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Name PROPERTY OWNER: (if Different from Above) Address �� 3�, APO �� ✓ Ecu ,`FL'F Phone (G - ) - Name Address Phone ( ) Legal Description of Property �- ;-?< Property Address j,= 34:s = ;�.��v, �� /-A/x- n,,L: Present Zoning �rcti r;,. P.I.D. # Explanation of Request: (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: Name Phone ( SURVEYOR: Name Phone Property Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature Date Date' 1/85 January 21st, 1992 City of Edina Planning Board Edina City Offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear City of Edina Planning Board: Please regard this letter as our request for a variance at our property on 5236 Brookview Avenue. While our proposed addition would be very modest in size, it would go a long way towards accommodating our growing family needs - Specifically, the creation of a powder room that would give our home two and one -half (21) baths with its' four bedrooms, the creation of a small breakfast room where none currently exists and a mud room that would serve to insulate us from the harsh climate in the winter. We believe that this modest expansion would be infinitely preferable to the purchase of a larger home and will enable us to stay, in the same neighborhood that we have grown to enjoy_ so much. Sincerel Y dunc�`(Ylae, Lark and Andrew B. MacPhail 5236 Brookview Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55424 ' _ �.-, •+ ; "' q. !� d L � .. C � ti, .1111 "� •` - .. • � j � / � p 1 ., � P�'rG/C � 1� C / � so cl 55 251 L plua all _ w ►v la 1,� w.l a•.iwa .•V r s ✓ H•••e ^• '�.••1. �,l.�eeee r; ..; )I ��d•t.(� Ise^ •� ew r, j le•1. S•MrJ i ! / il�t��' ��t Aer•�♦ -,1 e•f• ' /�1 �� 111. tJ \b eea.e�t /.�••- c b 1.S�GCIAIt�. `� � f,ilQ/1R•llE 14::Wr- ,�. 44-WO4 -/ tb • ZP- 4j -;.I.j -Z : ILI I I I f rkv!,FC. W& FLAL- L11T A' -� k IUD _ -_ � � .'Z eave.44cjesL 4— dEin- HA&4%A&,— V-VNve;x. 573A0 f5ecawlslif-&l 44. MWA- l | � ' tj _ . � | , ' L- | ' ' - _-' B -82 -37 David Mitchell, 5236 Brookview Avenue Lot 5, Block 1, South Harriet Park Board of Appeals and Adjustments November 4, 1982 Meeting Page two .Harold Sand reported that Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell propose an addition on the south side of the dwelling with a sunporch on the main floor and two bedrooms on the second floor. The sunporch will be constructed over a concrete patio adjacent to the living room and dining room. The bedrooms will be constructe above the sunporch and existing kitchen and dining room. The dwelling is a 1-21 story cape cod bungalow with brick siding. The additio will provide a full height second level and has wood lap siding. The design incorporates the same roof pitch as the existing gables. The lot is a pit- shaped corner lot with an area of 8082.9 square feet. The existing dwelling and detached garage cover 2298 square feet which is 28.4 percent. The maximum lot coverage permitted is 25 percent. Therefore, the existing structures exceed the permitted coverage by 3.4 percent or 277 square feet. The proposed addition increases the lot coverage 195 square feet for a total coverage of 2493 square feet which is 30.8 percent. A 5.8 percent variance is requested to permit the additional coverage. He added that the dwelling is located roughly parallel with the north propert" line and maintains an angular relationship to West 53rd Street. The house maintains a non - conforming side street setback that varies from 5 feet in the rear to 12 feet in front. The ordinance requires a 15 foot side street setback. The addition will - be placed directly above the non - conforming portion of the dwelling and will not decrease the existing setback. The setback variance is necessary because additionals to non - conforming single family dwellings are required to meet current standards. Mr. Sand explained that the neighborhood contains generally similar size IC however, a majority of the lots in the subdivision are rectangular. The dwellings were constructed during the same period of time and there are a variety of configurations including 1 story, I!.- story and 2 story dwellings. He suggested that the proposed variances permit a substantial addition to the dwelling that is reasonable considering the improvements on the site and the neighborhood context. The pie- shaped lot and angular relationship are circum- stances that can be addressed by a variance. The proposed lot coverage appears to be consistent with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Staff recommends approval of the variance with a condition that the variance is limited to the plan presented. Mance Mitchell was present on behalf of his brother, David. Mr. Mitchell owned the home prior to David and Joan Mitchell. He said-that they wished to maintain the integrety of the neighborhood and did not feel that this request would be inconsistent with homes throughout the neighborhood. Clark Miller questioned whether or not they had considered modifyi -r the height. Mr. Mitchell said that several options had been considered. Mr. Miller suggested that the height may be a little extreme and could possibly by modified somewhat.. He had no further comments or objections. John Palmer moved for approval of the variance as submitted with the conditions presented by Staff. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All ayes; the motion carried. "'01) EDINA CT.- I - So T" T 71 Ll T LEY E P AR, K A?JOE:tj _A�j P r\ La '7713 L H r COt N T ARKiNG RAMP 00 17- 4 IP InFT iaT T! �7 T —Lr C 0 MIM NUMBER B-82-37 David & Joan Mitchell L 0 C A T 10 N 5236 Brookview Avenue REQUEST 5.8 percent lot coverage variance (to permit 195 square feet additional coveraae) 10 foot side street setback variance ED"INA PLAMNING DEPARTMENT BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 4, 1982 B -82 -37 David Mitchell, 5236 Brookview Avenue Lot 5, Block 1, South Harriet Park Refer to: Attached survey, floorplans(2), elevations(3) and addendum to petition for variance Request: 5.8 percent lot coverage variance (to permit 195 square feet additional coverage) 10 foot side street setback variance. Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell propose and addition on the south side of the dwelling with a sunporch on the main floor and two bedrooms on the second floor. The sunporch will be constructed over a concrete patio adjacent to the living room and dining room. The bedrooms will be constructed above the sunporch and existing kitchen and dining room. The dwelling is a 12 story cape cod bungalow with brick siding. The addition will provide a full height second level and has wood lap siding. The design incorporates the same roof pitch as the existing gables. The lot is a pie- shaped corner lot with an area of 8082.9 square feet. The existing dwelling and detached garage cover 2298 square feet which is 28.4 percent. The maximum lot coverage permitted is 25 percent. Therefore, the existing structures exceed the permitted coverage by 3.4 percent or 277 square feet. The proposed addition increases the lot coverage 195 square feet for a- total coverage of 2493 square feet which is 30.8 percent A 5.8 percent variance is requested to permit the additional coverage. The dwelling is located roughly parallel with the north property line and maintains and annular re tionship to West 53rd Street. The house maintains a non - conforming side street setback that varies from 5 feet in the rear to 12 feet in front. The ordinance requires a 15 foot side street setback. The addition will be placed directly above the non - conforming portion of the. dwelling and will not decrease the existing setback. The setback variance is necessary because additions to non - conforming single family dwellings are required to meet current standards. This property was previously considered on December 15, 1977 by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments in case no. B- 77 -39. A 9 foot side street setback variance was granted to allow a new detached garage to be constructed with an 11 foot setback. The neighborhood contains generally similar size lots, however, a majority of the lots in the subdivision are rectangular. The dwellings were constructed during the same period of time and there are a variety of configurations including 1 story, 11 story and 2 story dwellings. Board of Appeals and Adjustments November 4, 1982, Meeting Page two RECOMMENDATION: The proposed variances permit a substantial addition to the dwelling that is reasonable considering the improvements on the site and the neighborhood context. The pie- shaped lot and angular relationship of the dwelling to the street create unusual circumstances that can be addressed by a variance. The proposed lot coverage appears, to be consistent with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Staff recommends approval of the variance with a condition that the variance is limited to the plan presented. CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INIC. LAND SURVEYORS 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343 Iv,, d„ R. A !?� .,s r� •o. a Y . P. 1:*adl 1s t a L If ri iel/r°s► V ir.s W e Cy W/ b 13a -- sl,rvf,,, Fay: Book � Paged ____"T� rgoP-rH I LUT 5 /ZE yovsF �f�r2�z�E J .t V /� . 115 5.5 Rv co &z. 9 .sue. 1=7 / 7 70.0 S .5zs. c' so. ter. 2v. � 229 8. o ZB `tom °/p GOliE�A E� 57. C .. . I Iroroby (trtify that llru Is o rrvo and cwrost ro rornlo% w at n aw"y el *9 bovadarioo of or S _tl 1i — Honnepin County, Ms- R000ca o+d a c•co of r-'I,bei^JfA'z'a 16Nwn, and all •iciula •nrlaaC)IMOR116 if oay. Iroa or on said land. Svrwyad iry as this — - or at -A00 s47 T 13, /9 S2 RW CAROARELLE fir AS:iGCIATES, INC. t-+ IS: V Tt 'ov IJ Loq PI.AA1 13 y -,. L rviril. ."y IJ Tt GFI 10 L cccn S . :C-r- 5 z T7 A y / 17 LI; it lz Ll LU K/A L , -.7,4 Ol taA-. Las . • t-L- U A.) C% bn jo L'CCJQ iAJ �T-'%;Z44— -4 LA 10 Lop I.-I-S 'nxID IAJ CIANLt. i27- 1 '-4'L#- '.-1 I"-):.C.-:;Arr Cr-11) A 4- -A INC. ROOM ADDITIONS ' ROOM ADDITION', --- .� .� ,,� . /'' � \ ,�� .. ��. ,. '� �. i ; � �i.. (I i ..� _ - ,: � �. � - .: =� � _ �. �� ,1 _ - .. ;.. _ - - -- i �� ... � � � }. - / / \ I � � � � � �j , � j� .i � i ` � � . ,.j _ . .,, l 1 �.� .. 1., � __... ,. . ,� �.� . t .. � � - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - -- � ------- - - -� -- ----- - - - - -� -�- - - - . _..- - _ - .. ;.. _ - - -- i C, m .......... C, m ADDENDUM TO PETITION FOR VARIA14CE (David a -d Joan Mitchell) a) Our house is of a unique design, built and posi- tioned on an irregularly shaped lot across Brookview Avenue from City park land in a quiet, low traffic residential area. Built in 1938, the house has only two bedrooms, one of which Is on the first floor. Only one -third of the basement was excavated in connection with the construction of the house. While the first floor contains over 1500 sq. ft, of living ::pacr:, the second floor contains approximately 140 sq. ft, of finished space. The balance of the second floor is unfinished. Due to the original design of the house and the complexity of the various rooflines, reasonable expansion possibilities are severely limited. Vie very much need additional bedroom and storage space. Our house is completely visible from three sides. In addition, the shape of our lot and the design of the house are such that we cannot obtain the needed additional space and maintain the architectural and aesthetic integrity of our home unless the requested variance is ,_anted. We have considered and rejected alternatives proposed by our lira - sent contractor (as well as other contractors) because of problems in design, construction and appearance. -I- b) As indicated in response to a, above, the shape of our lot and the manner in which the existing structure was positioned on the lot renders our home completely visible from three sides. We want to be sure that any addi- tion or alteration to the existing structure'be not only functional but also aesthetically pleasing and in keepin., with the basic architectural scheme of the house as well as the neighborhood in general. According to the current zoni.n> ordinance, we cannot construct any addition on either side of our home. In fact, it is questionable whether we can add the space needed in any manner without running afoul of :setback requirements which were presumably adoptec after the house was built in 1938. 19ith the exception of a three foot extension of the terrace concrete slab (necessitated by design requirements and not by a desire to gain additional space;) the proposed addition will not be constructed over anything that was not in existence when the house was-built in 1935. The house as built in 1938 violates the setback requirements of the current ordinance with respect to 53rd Street. Since ti :e proposed addition dons not affect the rights of any-adjoininS landowner.and since it is unlikely and (in the opinion of applicants) unnecessary and undesira- ble for the City to consider further expansion of 53rd Street, we respectfully request this variance. -2- c) Because we occupy a corner lot and becau3e our corner lot is irregularly shaped and Lecau:;e of the manner In which our home is positioned on our lot, we are prenented'with a number of additional rectriction:; to consider or overcome in connection with our planned imnroverents to our home, It is our position that the character and extent of our proposed improvements to our lot are consistent with I- nprovements made to other homes in the neighborhood and that "but for" the peculiarities attendent to our lot and the placement of the existing structure on the lot, our planned expansion would not be contrary to the letter of the zcning ordinance of the City of Edina. G d) Since our lot is a corner lot and since the most vinible por'�ion of the proposed addition will parallel the 53rd Street :tide of the property, th-, addition will not have an adverue impact on any other property in tr,e vicinity. No adjoining lots will be affected in any way. The addition will enhance the value of our home and, accordingly, the value of the surrounding, ho.-::es while at the sane time, it will not be out of keeping with the vala�z of properties in the neighborhood. We feel that the addition will maintain the architectural integrity of our hone and will be consistent with the preservation of the character and uniqueness of the surrounding neighborhood, in general. -3- -4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS + HELD DECEMBER 15, 1977 at 5:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present: June Schmidt, Chairman -Pro Tem; Clark Miller and - David Runyan Staff Present: Harold Sand, Assistant Planner, Karen Sorensen, Secretary I. Approval of November 17, 1977 Board of Appeals Minutes Mr. Miller moved for approval of the November 17, 1977 Board of Appeals and Adjustments Minutes. Mrs. Schmidt seconded the motion. All Voted Aye. Motion Carried. II. HEARINGS: B -77 -39 Mancel Mitchell. 5236 Brookview Avenue. Lot 5, Block 1, South Harriet Park Addition. REQUEST: Nine foot side street setback variance. Mr. Sand reported that Mr. Mitchell is converting the attached one and one -half garage into a family room and wants to build a two car detached garage in the rear yard. The garage will face W. 53rd Street and a 20 foot side street setback is required. The lot is pie- shaped and the location of the proposed garage causes a corner of the building to encroach nine feet into the setback. Mr. Mitchell desires to place the garage_as far toward the rear of the lot as possible to preserve the maximum usable rear yard and provide proper spacing between the garage and the dwelling. The adjacent lot has an accessory structure in the rear yard and it meets a setback similar to the one proposed for the Mitchell garage. Staff feels that the proposed location will have an adequate visual spacing from the road and dwelling. The purpose for a 20 foot side street setback is to allow room for parking between the garage and the property line. The lot has a small usable rear yard; the proposed garage location will preserve the maximum yard and the variance will correct an unnecessary hardship. Staff recommends approval of the variance for the following reasons: 1) the variance will correct an unnecessary hardship. 2) the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or adjacent properties. 3) the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances that apply to this property. Mr. Runyan inquired of Mr. Mitchell about the exterior treatment of the proposed garage. Mr. Mitchell stated that his home is an older one constructed of brick. The type of brick is no longer manufactured so he plans to put rough 1 ! Board of Appeals Minutes Page Two i December 15, 1977 I cedar siding on the proposed 20 x 22 structure. After some additional discussion, Mr. Runyan moved to approve the requested variance in accordance with the staff report. -Mr. Miller secc the motion. All Voted AYE. Motion Carried. III. Next Meeting Date: January 19, 1977 at 5:30 P.M. IV. Adjournment at 6:00 P.M. l Res ectfully, submitted, 2" Karen Sorensen, Secretary IAX Nall xuiN UTLEY EP p JU PA RK 50 �« a" NT ARKINf RAMP 6z bo ST ^a-+�• ARDEN CLUB�� »� _ -- ry PARR' . _- E LUA I _ _ co�m b variance REQUEST NUMBER: B -77 -39 LOCATION: 5236 Brookview Ave. Lot 5, Blk. 1, S. Harriet Park Addn REQUEST: 9 foot side street setback village planning depgrtment village of edina BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT December 9, 1977 B -77 -39 Mancel Mitchell. 5236 Brookview Avenue. Lot 5, Block 1 South Harriet Park Addition Refer to: Attached area map, survey and petition. REQUEST: 9 foot side street setback variance Mr. Mitchell is converting the attached, one and one -half car garage to a family room and will be constructing a 22 x 24 foot .detached garage in the rear yard. The garage will face W. 53rd Street and thus a 20 foot side street setback is required. It is desired to place the garage as far toward the rear of the lot as possible to preserve the maximum usable rear yard and provide proper spacing between the garage and the dwelling. The desired location causes a corner of the garage to encroach 9 feet on the required setback due to the pie- shaped lot. Therefore, a variance has been requested. It is apparent that this dwelling and others in the neighborhood maintain setbacks less than the proposed setback. Recommendation: Mr. Mitchell has chosen a logical means of creating a conforming two car garage to replace the old non - conforming garage. The staff feels that the proposed location will have an adequate visual spacing from the road and dwelling. The proposed site plan should maintain a better relationship to the neighborhood than the alternate conforming location. The primary purpose for a 20 foot side street setback is to allow room for parking between the garage and the property line. This location is a low traffic street with little likelihood of a sidewalk being constructed. Therefore, an occasional encroachment on the boulevard should not have a serious affect. The lot already-has a small usable rear yard; the proposed garage location will preserve the maximum yard and therefore the variance will correct an unnecessary hardship. Therefore, approval of the variance is recommended for the following reasons: 1. the variance will correct an unnecessary hardship. 2. the variance will not be detrimental to. the public welfare or adjacent propefties. 3. the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances that apply to this property. HS:ks i i E 4L , .41 13 14 10 5,4 PL. 10 �j 1 4 ro IK.z 50 r .9 ZO Lo+ I; i - '' - -- O ? S d.e or 14 •14 Z 74 ;';'SST 3 r d ST. 7- `� 1 4;0 i3 - j ' 4 I �, � I \01 L4 .01 Af 13 i7 - 14 ozn "I !-z; Z3 7- `� 1 4;0 i3 3. 11 4 Af 13 i7 - 14 ozn "I !-z; Z3 7- `� 1 4;0 i3 3. 11 4 13 I Z ozn "I 0 0 cl: C3, 4c/ Lof j4 RD'�Ft_I,LL & ASSOCIATES. RX. 941 -3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343 :0 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 15c.4Lr=7 I" Ln Book 315 Page LC_) ,, . z Oo� of T , r d .o • 87 0 .. . -A$ - � m C. 1 lereby Conily thot thiu It a trw wind terrect`reproMwlotlow d w 41rrvelp o) ►he bovwderls. el 5�i 7% 3.� tiJt w. end oil f -// Newne ^w County, Mrwwerore and a ocu�to� el ri(i.ly( .n there *&, l •�'� v��Y •idble ewcroethrnewbr it oar. Item, or on ea.d I*PJ. Sw- oyed iy am $his /,•� --day ol� eA �-�t2nitontt 1C ASSUCIATtS. lr'C. Date 141317 Fee Pa i d !/ / Jul 7 Applicant t;ancel T. :ditchell, jr. Phone 920 -5913 ( e Address 52;6 Brockview Ave. Zip 55424 Status of Applicant (o::nor, buyer, agent, etc.): Owner Legal Description: Lot 5, Blcck 1, South Harriet Park Street Address: 5236 Brcokview Ave. Cr f 0 kequest. ' 81iie street setback variance 141nnesota statutes and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance trill: (If yes, please explain. Use additional sheets if necessary.) Yes NO a) Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience. ^X _The unusual share cf the lot dictates the arorosed rlacement of proposed detached two car Paraee. b) Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. X See above c) Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. Similiar si_tuaticns to rrcposed exist in the immediate area. d) i:ot be materially detrimental to the public t•ielfare or Injurious to other property in th-a vicinity or zoning district. X The owner intends to uperade the property to improve the livability of the home and to provide a useful two car garage in ccm2liance with city zcnina_ ordinance. :o -npliance with present reeulations would not 'e visually acceptable, S1gpi ro of Aor)j /icrinr rrr� III.B. Edina /50th & France Office 5036 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 612/920 -1091 Fax 612/920 -3864 City of Edina, Minnesota City Council 4.801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Case File B -92 -3 To whom it may concern;. I live at 5224 Brookview and am in the real estate business. I see no adverse condition created by the described varience, and based on the size, type, and design considerations of many of the already approved additions in the area, see no reason why these people should be denied approval. TJ /mba 1: A Sincerely, om Jone 1 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR WOODDALE LAKES ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled " WOODDALE LAKES ADDITION" platted by George J. Game, fee owner, and Darlene B. Game, his wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 4, 1992, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this'4th day of May, 1992. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 4;1992, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of June, 1992. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk J "14 A. �pei.r�, cn i REPORT/RECOMMENDATION J ~�RR7RA'`O To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # T T T . c . From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only j=( Date: May 4, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Final Plat Approval- X I To Council Wooddale Lakes ' Addition - Katter Action ❑ Motion Family Partnership. Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Final Plat Approval subject to: 1. Subdivision dedication based on a land value of $215,000. 2. Executed Developers Agreement with security. 3. DNR Permit. 4. Executed and recorded 50 foot conservation easement. Info /Background: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council at it's September 23, 1991, meeting. The developers have been unable to buy right of way from the state for their street. Consequently, the right of way has been moved northward. Small adjustments have been made to lots 1, 2, and 3, to provide 15 feet of ' right of way. All lots continue to meet or exceed the "Neighborhood" median sizes and dimensions. ,J Subdivision No- SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT _ TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: 'V �� I 1�-C� t'L � AdAt -h 6 N LAND SIZE: I -S LAND VAL :_-�`y�� (By:-��% Date: ` ✓�!� 7 The developer of this subdivision has been required to 0 A. grant an easement over part of the land ElB. dedicate % of the land IjIz C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. II 2. If property is 6 acrv-s or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 13 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. ,.� 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required II1. In all other instances than above. �2. 9/23/91 -_2OV QQ Motion carried. *PUBLIC HFARING ON PRET XENARY - SINGLE DVE T-ING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD -2 PIANNED RESIDENCE D Y PIAT FOR OUTLOT -B PARKWWD KNOLLS 20TH ADDITION 11/4/91. Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by to-.continue -- the -- public -- hearing on- preliminary -- - - rezoning a Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence Distric plat approval for Outlot B, Parkwood Knolls 20th Ad , s. , PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WOODDALE LASES ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were A%I presented, approved and ordered placed on file. "'ll Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for property 1 located east of Millers Lane and north of the Crosstown Highway. The subject property is an undeveloped parcel of approximately 3.5 acres and is bounded on the north and east by a pond, on the south by the Crosstown Highway and on the west by a public path within the Wooddale Avenue right of way. The proposed plat suggests the easterly extension of West 64th Street into the property, turning north and ending in a cul -de -sac, to serve the six new single family lots. One half of the proposed new street is on State highway right of way and would require that the State release and transfer this land to the City. It would also require the relocation of the existing State owned fence along the highway. The development was initially proposed as eight single family lots. To evaluate the proposal, staff considered the 45 single family lots in the 500 foot neighborhood. with median dimensions as follows: median lot width of 82.2 feet, median lot depth of 135 feet and median lot area of 10,280 square feet. During review of the proposed eight lot plat, staff felt the proposed eight lot plat was too intense. The recommendation to the Planning Commission was that Lots l and 2 be combined, that the resulting lot be re- oriented to the cul -de- sac, and that Lot 8 be eliminated. The six lot plat would provide lots 86 to 125 feet in width, 160 to 270 feet in depth, and 16,362 to 31,154 square feet in area and all lots would exceed ordinance requirements. The revised six lot plat would accomplish three important objectives: 1. Lot dimensions and areas would be increased and the lot width variance for Lot 3 in the initial eight lot plat would be eliminated. 2. More space would be provided adjacent to the Crosstown Highway to construct noise mitigation features. 3. Building pad areas would-be increased and more space would be available for the conservation easement adjacent to the pond. At its meeting of September 4, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended preliminary plat approval of the revised six lot plat conditioned on 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) A 50 foot conservation easement along pond, 4) DNR review and permits, if required, 5) Watershed District grading permits and drainage analysis, 6) Developers Agreement, and 7) Release of right of way by MNDOT for extension of West 64th Street. Presentation by Provonent Fred Katter, representing the Katter Family Partnership, expressed appreciation for staff's guidance in proposing that the plat be reduced from eight to six lots resulting in a better subdivision. He explained that this area is very familiar to the Katter family, having developed some of the lots in the neighborhood in 9/23/91 209 Public Comment Mayor Richards noted that letters in opposition to the proposed subdivision have •.been received from: Mrs. E.H. Eisenbrey, 6228 Brookview Avenue South; Mrs. Joann Kruckeberg, 6320 Brookview Avenue; William Andrusko, 6304 Brookview Avenue; Jay and Judy Hornbacher, 4509 Nancy Lane; David and Susan Fleming, 6324 Brookview Avenue; and J.H. Cox, 6332 Brookview Avenue. Speaking in opposition to the project were: Jay Hornbacher, 4509 Nancy Lane; Lisa Finsness, 4536 Tower Street; Carol Saarela, 4508 West 64th Street; Annette Horton, 6309 St. Johns Avenue; John Thill, 6336 Millers Lane; Joann Kruckeberg, 6320 Brookview Avenue; and Merton Willette, 6333 Millers Lane. Comments made included concern for the existing wildlife habitat and natural wetland, safety for children and bicycle traffic at the corner,•sewer capacity for the additional six homes, perpetuity of the conservation easement, impact of berming and fencing, possible extension of Wooddale Avenue, and density. In response to the concern regarding the conservation easement, Attorney Erickson stated that State statute allows the City to impose restrictions relating to both natural and unnatural conditions by a conservation easement. The easement would run in favor of the City, would be placed of record and thereby made known to anyone buying the property. It would be referenced by lot line and be enforced by the City. Advice from residents that it was being violated would be useful to City staff. Member Bice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) 50 foot conservation easement along pond, 4) DNR review and permits, if required, 5) Watershed District grading permits and drainage analysis, 6) Developers Agreement and 7) Release of right of way by MNDOT for extension of West 64th Street: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WOODDALE LASES ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that, certain plat entitled "WOODDALE LASES ADDITION ", platted by The Satter Family Partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 23, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. by Membeff th and was seconded by em y e -- maintenance building at Braemar Golf �Tv#ayes.' d low bidder, Lester Building Systems, at $74,826.00. Motion carried on rol * CE BUILDING ARNESON ACRES PARS Motion was made by ifimIdIENEFIrind was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for the the 1950's. Their plan is to .continue the single family neighborhood by the extension of West 64th Street into the unused land for construction of six rambler type homes that will be larger and more expensive. Because of location, Lots 1 and 6 mitigate noise will require a combination of from the Crosstown Highway berming, fencing and plantings to and will be integrated into the architecture of the homes. Katter Family Partnership is committed to preserving the natural area along the existing pond on the property and have met with and : -,..- - .- - - - - -. talked with the various agencies involved in the preservation of the-area. - - - Public Comment Mayor Richards noted that letters in opposition to the proposed subdivision have •.been received from: Mrs. E.H. Eisenbrey, 6228 Brookview Avenue South; Mrs. Joann Kruckeberg, 6320 Brookview Avenue; William Andrusko, 6304 Brookview Avenue; Jay and Judy Hornbacher, 4509 Nancy Lane; David and Susan Fleming, 6324 Brookview Avenue; and J.H. Cox, 6332 Brookview Avenue. Speaking in opposition to the project were: Jay Hornbacher, 4509 Nancy Lane; Lisa Finsness, 4536 Tower Street; Carol Saarela, 4508 West 64th Street; Annette Horton, 6309 St. Johns Avenue; John Thill, 6336 Millers Lane; Joann Kruckeberg, 6320 Brookview Avenue; and Merton Willette, 6333 Millers Lane. Comments made included concern for the existing wildlife habitat and natural wetland, safety for children and bicycle traffic at the corner,•sewer capacity for the additional six homes, perpetuity of the conservation easement, impact of berming and fencing, possible extension of Wooddale Avenue, and density. In response to the concern regarding the conservation easement, Attorney Erickson stated that State statute allows the City to impose restrictions relating to both natural and unnatural conditions by a conservation easement. The easement would run in favor of the City, would be placed of record and thereby made known to anyone buying the property. It would be referenced by lot line and be enforced by the City. Advice from residents that it was being violated would be useful to City staff. Member Bice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) 50 foot conservation easement along pond, 4) DNR review and permits, if required, 5) Watershed District grading permits and drainage analysis, 6) Developers Agreement and 7) Release of right of way by MNDOT for extension of West 64th Street: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WOODDALE LASES ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that, certain plat entitled "WOODDALE LASES ADDITION ", platted by The Satter Family Partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 23, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. by Membeff th and was seconded by em y e -- maintenance building at Braemar Golf �Tv#ayes.' d low bidder, Lester Building Systems, at $74,826.00. Motion carried on rol * CE BUILDING ARNESON ACRES PARS Motion was made by ifimIdIENEFIrind was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for the Z =..4(_ �4.. N 89 .41 k' , F Ll 55' r'4 3: DRAINAGE 16 JtlLrTY EASEMENT 30' WOODDALE LAKES ADDITION vATER ELEVATICth AS OF APRIL 11 1992 7 862.84 ( N.&V.D.- 1929 ) N"PTH LINE OF THE 300TH 437.00 FEET OF THE 414 1/4 'F 14 NE :'4 SEC.JL.T.,6.R24 N 69*43'2b' C L = 46.76 FIE 13 1: P67.0 FEET ( N.F. V.D. - 19.:1 AZ'CDkl)ING TO THE CITY 'F EDINA %, 261.80 D 53 35'6' 3 300 v OUT OT A,,,-'.r GARRISON POND 15r.or, N ar4".t" f E I L 37.37 I 367.81 m 4 99'43'26' D = 42 49'11' Lk q N r L 40.2u-- '3 1 3 Z. 46 u3-31. D - 45 59' 46' 1 4504 Z =..4(_ �4.. N 89 .41 k' , F Ll 55' r'4 3: DRAINAGE 16 JtlLrTY EASEMENT 30' > vATER ELEVATICth AS OF APRIL 11 1992 7 862.84 ( N.&V.D.- 1929 ) HIGHEST KNr.VN VATER EIEVATI[IM L = 46.76 1: P67.0 FEET ( N.F. V.D. - 19.:1 AZ'CDkl)ING TO THE CITY 'F EDINA 3 P'. 261.80 D 53 35'6' 3 300 v SU;?VEY LINE 4 10-' 15r.or, N ar4".t" f E I L 37.37 I 367.81 m ti D = 42 49'11' q BENCH MARK- TOP NUT HYDRANT NO. SME L 40.2u-- L = 40.14 OF 64th St. BEIVEEN HOUSE • 4%k; Z. 46 u3-31. D - 45 59' 46' 1 4504 2 11 ELEV. - 873.31 ( N.G.VLD. - 1929 Z =..4(_ �4.. N 89 .41 k' , F Ll 55' r'4 3: DRAINAGE 16 JtlLrTY EASEMENT 30' vATER ELEVATICth AS OF APRIL 11 1992 862.84 ( N.&V.D.- 1929 ) HIGHEST KNr.VN VATER EIEVATI[IM L = 46.76 1: P67.0 FEET ( N.F. V.D. - 19.:1 AZ'CDkl)ING TO THE CITY 'F EDINA 261.80 D 53 35'6' 300 12, 15r.or, N ar4".t" f E I L 37.37 I 367.81 LA.; 4 D = 42 49'11' 50.0 DRAINArE UTILITY VAiEMENI m C3 U no o\ '6 Z- 6 1 "A., 7 6 C3 391.00 21' Zion 616.00 N 89*43'28' 1 1; S3UTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SEC.30 T28.R24 w9� —mil'! o71 M O •'NNRffIM j/ REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item w III. D. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑I Information Only I-x7 Date: May 4, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: I -494 Corridor To Council Commission (JPO) Strategy for Action ❑ Motion Implementary Travel Demand Management ❑Resolution (TDM. ❑ Ordinance. Discussion Recommendation: Infol Back ground Attached is the final draft of the JPO's strategy for TDM in the I -494 Corridor. The strategy was prepared for the Commission by COMSIS, a California based TDM consulting firm. The strategy, including timing, is summarized in the Executive Summary on pages i and ii. The JPO has scheduled an informational briefing on the strategy on Wednesday, June 24, 1992, from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. at the ° Decathalon Club in Bloomington. We hope to have the City Manager of San Mateo and a representative of the private sector there to describe their experience. City Council members of the five city JPO are encouraged to attend the meeting. v STRATEGIC PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT IN THE I -494 CORRIDOR (Task 2.1 Final Report) Prepared for: cr I494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Prepared by: COMSIS Corporation Hermosa Beach, CA March 1992 PRESENTATION OF JPO ADOPTED TDM STRATEGY TO CITY COUNCILS AND CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE OVERHEAD # TALKING POINTS 1 Opening • You've been periodically updated on the JPO's progress in developing a Transportation Demand Management strategy for the 494 corridor and a related ordinance to be adopted by each member city. • The JPO has adopted a coordinated TDM strategy (Strategic Plan) o Purpose of this presentation is to re- acquaint you with TDM and outline the adopted strategy 2 Overview of Presentation o Several topics are covered in this presentation, including: o What is TDM? o Why implement TDM? o What are the benefits and to whom? o What is the adopted JPO strategy? o Who will implement TDM? o Finally, I'll go over the next steps in the process to get us from here to a working program in anticipation of reconstruction 3 What is TDM? o Definition: A set of techniques aimed at reducing traffic (trips) by shifting commuters from driving' alone to shared ride arrangements or into non -peak travel periods. (reduce demand rather than increase supply) 4 TDM Definition (cont) o Goal is to move people and information, not vehicles o Three types of techniques: 1. Commute alternatives (carpools, transit, walking) 2. Incentives (subsidized bus passes, travel allowances) (or disincentives such as paid parking) 3. Alternative Work Arrangements to shift work time or place (flex -time, telecommuting, 4/40 work weeks) o TDM involves working through employers, developers and multi -tenant building owners to facilitate these techniques o Two of the mechanisms commonly used to facilitate these techniques are Transportation Management Organizations (such as Improve 494) and Trip Reduction Ordinances o Given the limited success of the TMO, the JPO is developing a Trip Reduction Ordinance or Policy Framework to mandate participation of the private sector 5 Why Implement TDM? o Growth in travel will outpace growth in population, employment and the ability to build more road to accommodate this travel o I-494 reconstruction plans (in DEIS) call for TDM to mitigate traffic disruption, especially on adjacent roads and highways o Improvements planned that need TDM HOV lanes will be part of 494 and 35W reconstruction bus service improvements in area (Mall of America, etc) o Contributes to maintaining mobility, air quality and quality of life n 6 External Influences o There are growing Federal, state and regional pressures to implement TDM strategies o Federal Legislation ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991) allocates significant $ to congestion and air quality areas (CMAQ) for HOV lanes, park and ride, etc) 1991 Clean Air Act Amendments recommend host of TDM activities as reasonably available measure to reduce mobile emissions o Proposed state legislation Metropolitan Traffic Reduction Act, pending in legislature calls for commuter trip reduction programs in congested zones and proposes tax incentives for employers who implement techniques o Existing Regional Policy Met Council Transportation Policy Plan charges cities in congested corridors to implement TDM program to raise number of people in vehicle from 1.1 to 1.3 Regional Transit Facilities Plan recommends HOV (carpool) lanes on 494 and 35W and outlines transit improvements in suburban areas 7 What are Benefits of TDM and Who Benefits? o To cities: mitigate impacts of reconstruction - low cost means to mitigate traffic o To employers: - reduce tardiness and absenteeism (esp. during recon) - enhanced recruitment and retention - new employee benefit - may realize cost savings in reduced parking o To commuters more options cost savings help during reconstruction 8 Adopted JPO Strategy for Implementing TDM 1) Cities adopt Trip Reduction Ordinance or Policy Statement 2) Employers plan and implement TDM programs 3) Target to reduce peak hour commute trips to employment destinations within corridor (by 15 -20 %); measure will likely be commute alternative rate or the proportion of commuters not driving alone to the site 4) Requirements for employer involvement will be phased -in; tied to reconstruction 5) Requirements for developers to build "TDM Friendly Sites" 6) Requirements for large multi- tenant buildings to coordinate programs with site 9 Phasing of Ordinance o Requirements will be phased so as to bring employers and others in slowly and educate then on TDM prior to reconstruction Phase 1: Before Reconstruction Employers report statistics and develop programs Phase 2: During Reconstruction Trip Reduction targets kick -in and requirements enforced Phase 3: After Reconstruction Refinements to Reflect Effectiveness of Phases 1 and 2 and desire to see results beyond reconstruction period 10 Policy and Implementation Framework (Who's doing what) o Steps involved in implementing TDM strategy o Specifies lead role for each step o City would adopt ordinance, enforce and revise o JPO would administer program and be staffed to do so o Employers would submit plans and implement programs o Improve -494 TMO and Minnesota Rideshare would support employers and their in -house coordinators o The JPO would monitor the program, document employer compliance and the results in each city to assure each is contributing to the corridor targets 11 Next Steps o TDM Strategy is now complete with the adoption of the strategy 1 o City staff are now informing council and business groups o The JPO's consultant is drafting a Trip Reduction Ordinance or policy statement o The JPO will convene a one -day workshop for public and private stakeholders in early June o Staff and the consultant will then refine the ordinance and the administrative roles o We'll convene another workshop this fall to gain a final consensus on the program o The cities will adopt an ordinance and implement Phase I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the primary purposes for forming the I -494 Corridor Commission was to create a Joint Powers Organization (JPO) to coordinate the planning, funding, and implementation of transportation and land use strategies to address growing traffic congestion concerns. It was acknowledged that the implementation of corridor strategies intended to manage travel demand was complementary to, not a substitute for, regional solutions and infrastructure expansion. A major objective of the JPO is the development of a Travel Demand Management strategy for the corridor and a Trip Reduction Ordinance to implement the strategy. Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies are most effectively implemented through employers and developers by shifting commuters from drive alone to shared ride arrangements. A Trip Reduction Ordinance or policy statement, enacted by each of the 5 member cities, would mandate employers and developers to implement or enhance TDM programs that would cause the desired shifts in employee commuting behavior. The implementation of requirements by the five member cities should be complemented by regional and state policies and programs that seek to affect travel demand at other employment destinations and throughout the region. The timing of these efforts coincides with the development and review of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the reconstruction of I -494 from the Minnesota River to I -394. This provides the opportunity for capacity expansion and demand management options to be examined together. 7DM is included in the DEIS as a mitigation measure for reconstruction and a means of maintaining current mobility and to reduce the impact of increased traffic levels predicted on adjacent highways and roads in the future. The purpose of the . TDM Strategic Plan is to provide a "game plan" for guiding the implementation of TDM strategies within the I -494 corridor. It defines goals, trip reduction targets, TDM techniques to be required or encouraged, implementation phasing, responsibilities of member cities, and implications of this overall strategy on the model ordinance or policy statement to be developed. This Strategic Plan builds on an earlier analysis, performed as part of the DEIS process, of TDM techniques that might be applied to the corridor. That analysis concluded that the following measures, listed in order of their feasibility, would need to be implemented if TDM were to have a significant impact on traffic: 1) Variable work hours to shift commuters outside the peak hour 2) Preferential parking for ridesharers 3) An HOV lane on I-494 in each direction 4) Ridesharing subsidies for employees using a commute alternative 5) Employee parking charges and a parking tax for solo drivers Transit service improvements and fare subsidies were also explored, but were estimated to have a far smaller impact than the time savings and cost incentives and disincentives provided by the HOV lane, parking controls and subsidies. These techniques, when applied to future employment (new development), yielded results of an 8 -18% reduction in the number of work trips that would otherwise by generated by 2010. Applying the same strategies to all employment (existing and future) yielded a 20 -32% reduction in trips. To implement these strategies, the JPO member cities would need to enact Trip Reduction Ordinances or Policy Statements that phase in mandatory TDM requirements among both existing employers and future developers and their tenant employers. An overall goal would be set for trip reduction in 2010, tied to desired trip reduction levels in order to mitigate reconstruction and traffic diversion impacts. That corridor -wide goal will be set at some acceptable level between the 8 -32% trip reduction potential forecasted as part of the earlier analysis. Performance targets, tied to each phase, would then be set by each city so interim milestones could be reached that contribute to the corridor -wide goal. Three phases would be established, coinciding with the reconstruction of I -494, as follows: Phase 1 - Passage of an ordinance or policy by each city would follow an extensive local consensus- building process on the TDM requirements. Prior to reconstruction, site design improvements would be required of new development and an annual reporting process established for employers and building owners. Phase 2 - Implementation of a 1-394 style" mitigation program would be tied to reconstruction, along with an interim HOV lane and the phasing -in of performance requirements for employers and building owners. Performance targets would be implemented in incremental steps, both in terms of their application and the percent trip reduction sought (see Appendix 4). Phase 3 - Based on the lasting affects of the mitigation program and the success of the performance -based requirements, the overall achievement of corridor goals will be assessed and specific TDM actions (such as preferential parking, subsidies or parking charges) prescribed as necessary. . The phasing allows TDM requirements to be gradually mandated, based on the evolving experience of the corridor with TDM and the success of the reconstruction mitigation efforts. Additionally, individual cities can decide how to phase in requirements based on development activity, the timing of reconstruction, policy considerations, and other factors providing the.efforts contribute proportionately to corridor -wide trip reduction targets. A hypothetical example of how an employer might comply is provided in Appendix 3. This overall strategy suggests a model ordinance be developed that is flexible enough to be tailored to individual cities' needs and preferences; can allow for each phase to be implemented as reconstruction impacts the corridor and the cities; while assuring each city's program is contributing in a timely manner to the corridor -wide trip reduction targets established in the Strategic Plan. Given the long -time horizon, cities can adopt ordinances which implement site design and basic reporting requirements over a 3 -7 year period and include provisions and "triggering ", mechanisms for performance requirements and mandatory TDM techniques as prescribed by the cities. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary ................... ............................... i Introduction and Purpose ............... ............................... 1 Overview of Existing and Future Conditions in 494 Corridor .................... 3 The Role of TDM in the 494 Corridor ..... ............................... 6 Phasing of TDM Implementation and 494 Improvements ..................... 10 Specific TDM Performance Targets ...... ............................... 12 Application of TDM Techniques ........ ............................... 14 Implications of the Strategic Plan for Model Ordinance and Administration ....... 20 Implementation Schedule .............. ............................... 24 Appendix 1: TDM Impact Forecasts and Application to DEIS Alternatives ........ 27 Appendix 2: Glossary of TDM Strategies .. ............................... 33 Appendix 3: Hypothetical Employer Example .............................. 36 Appendix 4: Overview of "394 - Style" Reconstruction Mitigation Program .......... 38 lll LIST OF TABLES Table Page 3.1 Summary of Trip Reduction Forecasts from TDM ...................... 8 5.1 Comparison of TDM Measures for 3M ............................. 13 6.1 Phase 1 TDM Techniques ........ ............................... 16 6.2 Phase 2 TDM Techniques ........ ............................... 17 6.3 Phase 3 TDM Techniques ........ ............................... 18 iv 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of the I -494 TDM Strategic Plan is to guide the implementation of TDM programs among employers and developers in the 5 member cities of the Joint Powers Organization. This will ultimately be accomplished through a model Trip Reduction Ordinance or policy statement to be enacted by each city. However, prior to developing an ordinance a consensus is needed on the overall goal of TDM in corridor and the means to fulfill it. Therefore, the I -494 TDM Strategic Plan attempts to answer the following 4 basic questions: 1) What is the goal of TDM in the corridor? 2) Who will need to comply with TDM requirements and what form will TDM requirements take? Who will administer the resultant program? 3) When will the requirements be implemented in order to reach the ultimate goals? 4) How will the requirements be imposed and enforced? In so doing, a "game plan" for implementing TDM throughout the corridor will be delineated. The Strategic Plan: o describes the existing and future conditions of the corridor, o provides estimates of TDM effectiveness and its application to the Draft EIS, o delineates phases for implementing TDM requirements, o enumerates TDM goals, objectives, and performance targets, o recommends which TDM techniques should be applied, o discusses the implications for the model ordinance, and 0 outlines an implementation schedule. This plan should guide the JPO and its member cities through the consensus - building process necessary to embrace and implement the tenets of the plan. Once this consensus is reached, a more detailed implementation plan may be necessary for each city or for the JPO. Before delving into the recommended approach to implementing TDM measures for the 5 member cities and the 494 corridor, the need for state and regional policies and programs should be emphasized. One of the stated beliefs of the JPO is that "a coordinated metro - wide TDM strategy is needed to fully address regional traffic congestion." Clearly, local jurisdictions have the greatest control over land use (that creates travel demand). Additionally, an approach that coordinates the policies of 5 cities in a single corridor is an effective response to traffic problems transcending municipal boundaries and affecting an entire employment area. However, regional and state policies are often needed to assure travel demand management strategies are in place in other peak period traffic producing areas. This helps mitigate through -trips on regional facilities and assures "an equal playing field" is created for cities, developers and employers participating in trip reduction strategies. State, and even federal, policies may be needed to provide tax incentives and enablement of local regulatory powers. The Metropolitan Council already has a policy encouraging TDM in congested corridors to achieve a 1.3 average vehicle occupancy. Additionally, the Regional Transit Board is developing a bill, the Metropolitan Traffic Congestion Reduction Act, that would mandate TDM strategies in designated areas and provide tax incentives for employee and employers. As plans for TDM programs and requirements are moved forward among 494 corridor cities and business leaders, coordination with regional and state initiatives will be crucial. Next Steps The JPO's discussion on the Strategic Plan has focused on several key issues. First, the type and nature of TDM requirements was debated. Second, the overall goals for TDM, in terms of trip reduction tied to various DEIS alternatives, were discussed. Finally, the type and content of an ordinance necessary to effectuate the TDM techniques and reach the corridor - wide goals have become more apparent. Based on this discussion, the next steps include: (1) Plan and conduct a workshop(s) among key stakeholders to discuss the Strategic Plan and ordinance development (2) Re -run the COMSIS TDM Evaluation Model to revise the estimated trip reduction impacts based on input from the cities (3) Develop a draft Trip Reduction Ordinance for consideration by the JPO and its member cities (4) rPlv rro de ongoing input to the DEIS process based on the projected impacts of DM (5) Revise the Strategic Plan as necessary and finalize ordinance for use in a broader education and consensus - building process among elected officials, planners, employers, residents, developers, building owners, and others. 2 2. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS IN 494 CORRIDOR Based on the description and analysis provided in the Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), distributed in July 1991 by BRW, Inc., some key land use, economic and travel conditions that exist (1988/90) or are anticipated (2010) can be summarized. In general, the 494 corridor is the second fastest growing commercial real estate market in the Twin Cities. Even with a slow -down in growth, affecting the statistics cited below, the corridor will remain a prime area for office, retail and other commercial growth. Urban beltways continue to be the prime focus of commercial development in the U.S. and the focus of travel demand management programs addressing suburb -to- suburb commuting trips. Key statistics cited in the DEIS are summarized below and includes a discussion of more recent analysis of land use projections. Socioeconomic Forecasts Population and Emplovment o According to 1988 projections, population will increase almost 20 %, from 256,000 to 303,000 in the corridor, twice the anticipated regional growth rate. o The cities of Minnetonka and Eden Prairie will experience the greatest population growth, increasing by 24% and 66% respectively. i o Employment will increase over 70 %, from 151,000 jobs in the corridor to 259,000, with the greatest growth coming in office and commercial (including retail) employment o While the city of Minnetonka is forecasted to realize the greatest proportional increase (114 %) in jobs and Eden Prairie an above average increase of 88 %, Bloomington's 78% growth (to 113,000 jobs) -will mean Bloomington will account for almost half of the jobs in the corridor. Recent interest in jobs /housing balance may- affect land use policies and, therefore, populations and employment distribution. Land Use Land use projections drive traffic forecasts and, as such, they should be carefully understood. The statistics cited here represent the most comprehensive look at growth and traffic in the future, but 2 significant caveats should be noted before presenting the projections. First, when the land use, and therefore the traffic projections were made, much of the existing conditions were based on 1988. The projections are based on maximum build -out allowable in each comprehensive plan and full occupancy. However, no new office towers have been built since then in the corridor. The year (1988) represented the end of a robust development period and may have lead to projections that may not be realized as the rate and amount of growth slows in the near term. 3 Second, more recent information, taken from the Towle Real Estate Report, suggests most new development has been put on hold and high vacancy rates (30% in 1988) for office space are dropping (to 22% in 1991) as employers absorb existing space. Many firms have instituted lease clauses that reserve additional space or will increase internal employee densities if and when expansion pressures warrant. This absorption and increased densities will bring more employees to . the area and increase traffic, resulting in a significant proportion of the 1 million additional trips cited above coming from this "in- filling." In fact, if increased employment is accomplished through increased densities, severe parking problems can accompany any increases in traffic. As an example, the first phase of the Minnesota Center on the Bloomington /Edina boundary experienced parking shortages as tenants with higher office employment densities moved in. Therefore, growth pressures may relieve the need to reduce as many trips in the long run; but short-run absorption of existing space will create more trips with less control over site design and parking. This suggests that even with decreasing growth pressures as employees fill -up now vacant spaces and capacity on I -494 decreases during reconstruction, trip reduction programs will be necessary to maintain acceptable levels of mobility. Acknowledging the caveats provided above, the 1988 projections are as follows: o More than 50 million square feet of office and industrial space existed in 1988, along with almost 12 million square feet of retail space. o By 2010, some 30 million additional square feet of office and industrial space and 9 million additional commercial /retail space were projected to developed in the corridor (recent analyses are not as optimistic as stated below). o The greatest overall growth and growth in commercial and industrial space is forecast for Eden Prairie, while Bloomington is expected to realize the greatest growth in office space. These 2 cities do and will continue to account for two- thirds of the non - residential development in the corridor. o The type and pattern of development is not anticipated to change in the next 20 years, given the newness of development in the corridor, and will continue to focus on residential uses in the north /south (Minnetonka and part of Eden Prairie) and office /industrial/ commercial in the east /west portion in the other cities. However, the amount of development and relative proportion of land uses may shift as economics and demographics change. Transportation and Air Quality Forecasts Travel o Traffic will increase in the corridor as the average daily trips generated in the area increase from 2.7 to 3.7 million trips. Non -home based trips will increase by half while home -based work trips (commuting) will increase by a third. 4 o If no improvements are made to 494, assuming the above stated increases in jobs and development, several segments of roadway on 494 and the cross -town (T.H. 62) will be above capacity (near gridlock). o This will force more traffic onto arterials and major streets and even onto residential streets. o The average trip time will increase by two- thirds. For example, a commute trip the length of the corridor (from I -394 to T.H. 77) that required 24.5 minutes in 1988 is projected to take over 45 minutes in 2010 if no improvements are made on 494. Air Oualitv o The corridor does not currently exceed ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide (CO). As increased traffic on 494 and signalized intersections experience chronic delays due to overcapacity conditions, the potential for CO "hotspots" increases, and will only be partially off -set by the introduction of mandatory "smog checks" in the Twin Cities. However, air quality impact analysis concludes that the potential for CO violations, even with no improvements to 494, is minor. Existing Commuter Characteristics Additional information on existing conditions is provided by the area studies performed by Improve 494 in 1989 and 1990. Over 6,500 employees were surveyed in 3 areas within the corridor to determine commuting patterns and demographic information.. This information was used to develop TDM plans for each area based on stated travel and socioeconomic characteristics of employees. The data underscored the auto - dependent nature of the area, with only 10% of employees commuting via carpools or other alternatives and 60% of all employees using their car for mid -day personal trips. The TDM modeling exercise, described in the next section, utilized a non -solo rate of 17 %, as opposed to the 10% share revealed through the surveys. Consisting of slightly different populations and time periods, the 2 sources of mode split information do reveal an auto dependent environment with most ridesharing occurring in 2- person carpools (among co- workers, family and neighbors) and only one half of one percent using transit. The area studies, coupled with focus groups among employers and employees suggests traditional rideshare marketing alone, in the absence of incentives and disincentives, will not induce a significant proportion of commuters to switch to shared -ride modes or alter their work arrangements to reduce peak hour travel. The analysis summarized in the next section discusses what it would take to induce travel behavior changes of a magnitude to meet local mobility, traffic mitigation and air quality goals. 3. THE ROLE OF TDM IN THE.494 CORRIDOR Planners and elected of jkials agree our ability to build our way out of growing congestion and concomitant environmental problems is severely limited by dollar, lain local sensiffimies and time. As the growth described in the previous section continues to place pressures on our transportation system, 3 primary strategies remain: 1. Managing new growth through land use controls 2. Managing existing infrastructure through expansion and systems management 3. Managing travel demand through Travel Demand Management (TDM) These strategies are not mutually exclusive and are often implemented in a concerted fashion. Long -term land use controls and short-term TDM measures overlap when sites are designed to be conducive to commute alternatives. Infrastructure management and TDM overlap with the provision of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) on -ramps and lanes. This Strategic Plan primarily focuses on Travel Demand Management (TDM), but also considers how site design and HOV facilities impact the use of commute alternatives and the effectiveness of employer -based trip reduction programs. In fact the key to this Strategic Plan is the careful integration of employer programs mandated by the recommended TDM policies (that encourage incentives to commuters) with the provision of TDM services and facilities (such as carpool lanes on 494 and 35W) that create the alternatives. to driving alone. This section defines TDM, enumerates recommended TDM goals and objectives for the corridor and summarizes the impact that TDM is estimated to have on future travel patterns in the corridor. A Definition of TDM Travel Demand Management refers to a set of techniques aimed at reducing vehicle trips by shifting travelers out of drive alone arrangements and into shared ride arrangements or into alternative work arrangements that remove trips from peak travel periods. The key is moving people and information rather than vehicles. TDM generally consists of the following groups of actions: 1. Alternatives to driving alone (e.g. carpooling) 2. Incentives to encourage the use of those alternatives (e.g. time savings from a carpool lane or subsidized bus passes) 3. Methods to shift the time, place or days when trips occur (e.g. flex -time) 6 TDM Goals for 494 Corridor One primary purpose of the Strategic Plan is to define goals, objectives and specific targets for the overall I -494 TDM effort. These goals and objectives are meant to complement and reflect the goals and beliefs endorsed by each JPO member city. Overall goals for TDM in the corridor include: Goal' - Manage existing congestion and reduce congestion based on future projections. Goal 2. - Maintain or improve mobility options available to commuters and residents (through enhanced transit options, park -and -ride opportunities, etc.) which contributes . to the high quality of life Minnesotans have come to expect. Goal 3 - Preserve the environment, including improving air quality and preserving energy, in the corridor and the -region. TDM Objectives and JPO Goals Specific objectives, reflective of stated JPO goals and beliefs, and the goals they address include: 1. Mitigate the impacts of I -494 reconstruction and complement HOV facilities planned for 35W and 494 (congestion) 2. Reduce peak period vehicle trips (congestion) 3. Shift commuters to non -peak periods (congestion) 4. Enhance and improve the quality, cost effectiveness and availability of commute alternatives (mobility) 5. Reduce CO emissions and energy use (environmental) Estimated Impacts of TDM As part of the development of the'Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the reconstruction of 494 through the southwest corridor, COMSIS performed an evaluation of various packages of TDM techniques and estimated their impacts on future traffic in the corridor. The potential number of trips reduced from projected 2010 levels were estimated and the reductions used in analyzing DEIS alternatives, with and without TDM. Although TDM is not a required component of any alternative, the potential impact of TDM on the freeway was assessed. The TDM evaluation results and application to DEIS alternatives are discussed in more detail in Appendix 1. For the purposes of the Strategic Plan, it is important to summarize the results of the TDM estimates and the projected impact of TDM on the various DEIS 7 alternatives. This will frame the discussion necessary to select an overall trip reduction target for the purposes of mitigating reconstruction and adjacent spill -over impacts. The packages of TDM techniques evaluated included estimating the impacts of: o an HOV lane on 494 o improved transit service, fare reductions and /or employer subsidies o employer rideshare programs (matching and vanpooling) and flex -time o preferential parking o parking charges or taxes A "medium" and a "high" package of strategies was developed, differing primarily with the amount of time savings or cost attributable to a technique and not the mix of techniques. Thus both packages included subsidies parking charged and transit improvements, with the "high "package containing a more aggressive version of the "medium "package. The packages were then applied to 2 situations based on the imposition of mandatory trip reduction requirements; 1) future employers at new developments only ( "new mandatory"), or 2) from all employment, existing and future employers ( "full mandatory"). When the "medium" and "high" packages were applied to "new" and "full' mandatory conditions, estimates for four TDM scenarios were developed. These estimates are summarized in Table 3.1 and reflect a.m. peak hour commute trips. Since the TDM programs of employers in the corridor would reduce trips on both the freeway and other roads, the proportion of trips reduced on 494 itself is also summarized. This means for every trip reduced on 494, two trips are being reduced on other highways, arterials and local roads This is a distinct benefit of a corridor -wide 7DM program coordinated by the S cities Table 3.1 Summary of Trip Reduction Forecasts from TDM TDM Package Area -wide Reduction Reduction on 494 Medium /New 8% 3% Medium /Full 18% 6% High /New 20% 8% High /Full 32% 11% These estimates of trip reduction were then applied to the DEIS alternatives and 2010 travel forecasts. "No Build," "TSM only," and 'Build" alternatives were evaluated with and without TDM trip reductions. Most alternatives assumed the "high /full' package and a 32% trip reduction. While an analysis of TDM impacts on DEIS alternatives was performed, the DEIS assumes that TDM is not necessary to meet travel demand. Therefore, TDM is offered as a mitigation measure during highway reconstruction and to relieve traffic congestion on adjacent highways and arterials during and after construction. Since 2 trips are reduced on local roads by the 7DM strategies for every one on 494, the use of 7DM as a mitigation measure is warranted Once a consensus is reached on the package of TDM strategies feasible for the corridor, the appropriate application to new and existing development and the desired mitigation levels, a corridor -wide trip reduction goal can be set. A final TDM analysis will be performed and a optimal trip reduction target, between 8 -32 %, can be recommended. Z 4. PHASING OF TDM IMPLEMENTATION AND 494 IMPROVEMENTS Given that the need for implementing TDM techniques is being assessed in conjunction with plans to reconstruct I -494, the TDM strategy outlined here is based on a phased approach tied to reconstruction. The success of TDM techniques used as a mitigation strategy for reconstruction impacts associated with the upgrading of T.H. 12 to I -394 provide a sound model (see Appendix 4 for a description of a "394 - style" mitigation program). Consideration of these phases should acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding the timing and funding of the 494 improvements. If reconstruction were delayed, the phasing could be adjusted or a different threshold used to "trigger" mandatory requirements. Conversely, if highway disruption occurs at an earlier time, phasing could be accelerated. Three distinct phases are recommended: Phase 1 - Pre - construction (1993 - 1997) Phase 1, implemented prior to initiation of reconstruction activities and disruption of traffic in the corridor, will include developing a political consensus on the recommended TDM strategy and finalizing a model ordinance or policy statement. The cities will then adopt trip reduction ordinances or another form of requirements and a related time- table. Prior to reconstruction, employers and building owners should be required to fulfill reporting requirements so a baseline of information and program experiences can be developed. Developers should be required to comply with site design and mixed use requirements conducive to TDM. A corridor -wide TDM educational program should complement requirements initiated in Phase 1. Phase 2 - Reconstruction Mitigation (1995 - 2010) Once reconstruction begins, or when pre- specified levels of service are exceeded on 494 or in adjacent cities, 2 related strategies would be implemented. First, a I -394 type mitigation program should be developed and implemented. Interim and permanent HOV lanes are planned for the reconstruction of both 35W and 494. The TDM programs prompted by the city policies should support the availability of these carpool lanes. In fact, the 35W interim lane could be implemented as early 1995, triggering the need for employer requirements. Second, employer trip reduction requirements should be imposed to mandate TDM performance targets be met by certain dates. Enforcement should begin and penalties may be considered to encourage compliance. Additionally, incentives for full compliance can be built into each cities policy. Employers complying before required dates could be rewarded in some fashion, including the ability to "sell" or trade TDM credits to other employers. The schedule for these targets will be tied to the desired reductions adopted by each city. Even though reconstruction will be phased over a long period, the requirements and mitigation program should be implemented concurrently by all cities. The mitigation program will enhance alternatives available to all 10 commuters and the employer requirements will reinforce those alternatives with incentives and supporting progiams. Phase 3 - Post - construction (1997 - 2010) During reconstruction, the mitigation program and employer compliance will be monitored to assess fulfillment of the overall corridor trip reduction goal. As reconstruction winds down, or if performance targets are broadly being missed, specific TDM strategies, such as parking management or financial incentives, could be prescribed and made mandatory as part of the employer requirements. Again, the local ordinances or policy statements should provide provisions for defining and encouraging or requiring specific TDM techniques. 11 5. SPECIFIC TDM PERFORMANCE TARGETS While the goals and objectives, enumerated in Section 3, should be embraced by each member city, the specific targets can be adjusted to reflect local needs as long as interim targets and variations between cities contribute to the overall corridor trip reduction target. TDM Performance Targets In order to meet the trip reduction forecasts projected for the year 2010, mandatory requirements for employer (existing and future), developer and building owners (multi - tenant buildings) to implement TDM measures will be necessary. The basic philosophy, as reflecting in the phasing is to require performance targets (trip reduction or mode shift results) that are gradually increased and eventually supplanted with prescribed actions. Overall performance target: Reduce peak period vehicle trips by 8 -32% by 2010 Interim targets: Interim targets will be set for the corridor for each of 3 phases, based on the rate of progress needed to reach the overall target, the end date of the construction period, and a re- evaluation of effectiveness of each TDM technique being employed. Cities could set different performance target schedules as long as their contribution was timely and in relative proportion to the corridor- wide.2010 target. o Phase 1 targets could be set relatively low (perhaps a 2 -5% trip reduction), to reflect enhanced voluntary programs and growing experience among employers with TDM planning and reporting requirements. While targets should be set in the pre - reconstruction perhA enforcement and penalties would not be imposed o Phase 2 targets will be set to reflect trip reduction levels needed for reconstruction mitigation, the enforcement of targets, and the progressive increase of targets to meet the overall target. Increased targets should also be tied to the availability of enhanced commuting options as implemented during the reconstruction phase. o Phase 3 targets should reflect the overall corridor targets for 2010 and, if progress is not being made, specific TDM actions should be prescribed that are deemed necessary in specific cases to reach the targets. For example, if transit and rideshare subsidies are not sufficient for a certain class of employers to reach the overall or final performance targets, these employers might be required to implement paid parking and a travel allowance to provide the appropriate mix of incentives and disincentives to reach the target. Performance measures: Performance targets for employers can be specified in different ways in the model ordinance and subsequent local policies. The 3 most common measures and the corresponding range for the overall target for 2010 are:, 12 (1) Percent trip reduction: 8 - 32% trip reduction over projected 2010 levels (2) Average vehicle occupancy (AVO) or ridership (AVR): 1.2 - 1.6 AVO by 2010 (or the regional goal of 1.3) (3) Commute alternative rate (CAR) equal to the non -drive alone mode split: 30 - 68% CAR by 2010 (against a baseline CAR of 10 -17 %) To help illustrate the application of each measure, the TDM program at 3M headquarters can provide an example. Comparing the sites commuting statistics from 1970 (prior to initiating their program) to 1985 (program maturity), Table 5.1 provides a comparison of each measure: Table 5.1 Comparison of TDM Measures for 3M Measure 1970 1985 Drive Alone 86.4% 76.4% Commute Alternatives (CAR) 13.6% 23.6% Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) 1.09 1.25 Percent Trip Reduction 0 9.7% Put another way, 3M was generating 92 vehicles per 100 employees in 1970. That statistic was reduced to 83 vehicles per 100 employees in 1985, for a reduction in trips arriving at the site (10% decrease). While each measure has its pros and cons, the key considerations to be made when selecting a performance measure are: o ease of understanding for employers and others o ability to account for alternative work arrangements (flex -time, compressed work weeks and telecommuting) o ability to relate the measure back to the overall trip reduction target. For example, the City of San Diego ordinance uses the reciprocal of the Commute Alternative Rate (CAR) by measuring performance based on the employee drive alone rate (EDAR) and then providing "credits" for alternative work arrangements. 13 6. APPLICATION OF TDM TECHNIQUES The TDM program developed for the corridor, and the enabling mechanisms requiring participation among employers, developers and building owners, will be performance based. This means participants can comply by implementing any set of TDM techniques that will achieve the targets. However, the following set of recommended techniques appropriate to various applications will assist city staff and others in educating the regulated community and assist with TDM plan review and implementation. Employer, Developer and Building Owner Requirements Requirements should be placed on 3 distinct groups: employers, developers and building owners. o The primary focus of the' requirements will be on employers with both existing and future employment covered under employer requirements. Sites with 100 employees or more would comply first, with reporting requirements of Phase 1 being modified into trip reduction performance requirements in subsequent phases. Sites with less than 100 employees begin complying in Phase 2. These smaller firms may be provided with less stringent requirements (lower performance target and filing fees) and the strategies may be different than for larger firms (e.g. vanpooling). Finally, the smallest employers might only participate through the multi- tenant requirements outlined below. o Developer requirements will focus on site design improvements conducive to TDM (such as carpool and vanpool staging areas and telecommunications networks). However, a more significant developer role can be envisioned if cities concentrate development around major retail centers, designed to be major transit hubs (planned or existing at Ridgedale, Eden Prairie Center, Southdale and the Mall of America). This access to transit and other land uses, coupled with TDM site design, could create significant opportunities for reducing trips. o Finally, if employer requirements are differentiated by size, multi- tenant office buildings, and industrial parks should be included to capture the impacts of TDM on the smallest employers (1 -49). Even if small employers are expected to participate, service .delivery and reporting might be best accomplished through building managers in multi- tenant settings, with larger employers complying on their own. While building owners will be required to comply, building management will likely implement any progrmns or services Tables 6.1 - 6.3 present 3 matrices outlining the most appropriate TDM techniques for various types of applications (employer, developer and building managers) during each phase of TDM requirements. Two types of development are specified, office (office and industrial) and non -office (commercial and retail), and 2 size categories (under 100 and 100 and over) to- correspond to the distinction made in the TDM modeling exercise. It is also assumed requirements and performance targets may be phased -in by'employer size, and the strategies recommended in the matrices reflect this. 14 For each TDM strategy and application, an "x," "o" or blank is provided. An "x" reflects strategies which are deemed most appropriate during that phase. For example, no strategies are appropriate for employers with less than 100 employees if Phase 1 only includes requirements on larger employers. Similarly, telecommuting is not deemed feasible for non - office employers, or at least not for a majority of the employees. An "o" corresponds to optional strategies. Optional strategies are not common during the early phases of TDM requirements or for certain applications, but are feasible and do contribute to trip reduction. Credit might be given for the implementation of optional strategies For example, rideshare subsidies are effective in reducing trips, but are most often avoided until less costly approaches are explored.. Alternatively, site design incentives are not common among employers, as a retrofit situation, but can be effective. Finally, blanks reflect strategies that are infeasible or inappropriate for a given application. The TDM techniques enumerated include the basic categories of commute alternatives, incentives, supporting elements, alternative work arrangements and site design. A glossary of TDM terms developed for the County of San Diego, is attached to define specific techniques. 15 TABLE 6:1 ' $ e �cc•`�;y ` a1 ....... :ry:... ;..Y.:.:.vE.v:.:... k..y.xr ��,,{{''�� - ii'I.«: ,: „�:y1/ '•w`,lsSskksr Y all; ::.; , sy .:...........'a+:i..o.....:.. .,.. :............:......:.. .... .r.£ .. ::..: ..::e7Ssk:.t:: .M1. u:f,�.c ':: 'h.?iiM1: n!15:?..: �::, .: yfv.. + y kf ..... ,.....: .............. ......... vk.. o . ..:.... d v . Carpooling 'NMI n ::.£ : t� Otis } ?x `�.. ;:. ;t.. .:�• : �`. � ' r.,"s�:�.;:'`�, <e.{n. .'.`'.��. xr: {3.;f�. •�,�.�x ',<n� } <:c, ort'??ckv',+.,s'"'^,alq'� A ...,:.. �•:• . �,.3t.::kn:::,'#R:....v}..,fi:'. `.£? .y:..`i,:/+.,�:.�.�a,�� . y�,aE#:.`��s: ... {v:.3.: .t,�':'�'��$ �,yey� X X X Van pooling X X X Transit X X X Bicycle/Walk X X X ; Rideshare Subsidies O O Transit Subsidies X X Paid Parking O O Reduced Parking Requirements X O X O Preferential Parking X X X Extra Vacation O O Rideshare Matching X X X On -Site Coordinator X X X Commute Center /Area X X X Fairs/Promotions X I X X Prizes /Giveaways X X X Guaranteed Ride Home X X X Child Care O O O Work Hours Mgmt X X Compressed Work Weeks X Telecommuting X Pedestrian Access O O X X X. O Bicycle Facilities O O X X X O Transit Access O O' O O X O Rideshare staging Areas O 1 O X X I X O Personal Services O O O O X O Information Center /Area O O X X X O Telecommunications . O O X O X O Shared or Off -Site Parking O O O O X O Mixed Use X W _ . Strategies appropriate for this phase 'O' - Optional strategies 'Blank' - Infeasible or inappropriate strategies 16 TABLE 61 ' { • v 2k. .,' f, o♦M„'f',•,: x,: ..... ........ :......... ,....:3.::.,..k........ . ,..., S• 4 ....,a�Ypr.�fr;.L) "N.!'W�,vR+'i .,4 ^'.:�" • } {. {�` � :„ ,, ,..:... .:.,... y.; .,r:.: `•z>r".�5:; ..:.:::.<..�}(f.:. ::ff2�f...,f_:......:.. „......:... ti.. .. ... ....�.1......N..� . .........:.. \....,..:.?C ♦ 2 i 2 Carpooling „....: .... ��..,. aC�n:Yi:siEr> ,r •� •� r }: 4i: :.::i4j{::2.::. +,r:: }:::;' {; ?<' ::(R::X.: :{ �... f .X.lCf7C'7:{LWY �� l�:i:}%.TE `' �: +.. ...A.o-•+:.5".. '`�,: �..,G'f:kF3•:i f:'irn2:>'.��,� %zey::}:,, »r.Y.;;:yy♦`y .��' .. Wiz`' , 4�• S }n.} •'�S. .A':}. •,v ..3 iiA; .:3• gkf,fj,{Y.,^Y\y(.t'N '... ' . 'K . :., k.:.,. .: fk.^..'Q,F•. iy4:y: :.. }.:- ',f.•:`ti:•: 3• ..� ,. .S :��C,�Y.�Y.TC$r?••:�.}7f�3}�� } .:Sk2. k, �r•S < {: S : �,kkik,",tiY' ,....:..2.. n . ....:.... .:..,:.. v... .....,...........,... , s......,.. }......:::.:::. {.Y:.: S;y:1. r.. )..}4:r:}'S •,5.. : <6:;'`.::it .�. .� :•'�F 2 \, �i.SSLr: 3 iP� :fa�S•i{ {{{:: ��.xF f Y}{, . � . ..�•... Mfr... :its #: � „�ts:i:�. <;s�v ,..r.•::::::{t;.c }.:?�:... .:i: f � � • • , n.� � . �V1F. ..., . ..,. { . .. .. : ,• .:....... {<& ".zr!XQn: }' � •. F: >;: >> . i�ul . ro h �. ,::. a :t .,..,. ,,z .rr , f2: f ..'�""l�an�. .f�'�C�•`:�` ��[��y , ...,.. .......,. #., :..., .,,..... . ..:...:.....s...:.:�f.4ti,Ri::.. rh•.:::: r::.,:c }: �}/.�: .: }.'YSS. }:Sa }:•rrrs'r:y : } ?:a }:a }:::::::. �: :� ,v i�`.:�.YA�WAf� :. :Z. {...,,..o'P.C..., EE. .r•. X.A. ..Y•.. .. o..... ;..,;,. :.r„ }�. .,..:.}., .. .. :..3Qfl�,rx' ::.} :Mlxed >: ?: ;. ..........::: r:�:�� X X X X X Vanpooling O X O X X Transit X X X X X Bicycle/Walk , ,:,Jfi•7,: Rideshare Subsidies X X X X I X O X O X Transit Subsidies X X X X Paid Parking O X O X Reduced Parking Requirements I X X X Preferential Parking X X X X X Fora Vacation X X X X .EA"QGBAM SCTI!t!QRT a:. Rideshare Matching X X X X X On -Site Coordinator X X X X X Commute Center /Area X X X X X Fairs/Promotions X X X X X Prizes /Giveaways X X I X X X Guaranteed Ride Home X X X X X Child Care AM« O X O X X Work Hours Mgmt X X X X Compressed Work Weeks O X O X Telecommuting X X O O Pedestrian Access O O O O X X X O Bicycle Facilities O O O O X X X O Transit Access O O O O X O X O Rideshare Staging Areas O O O O X X X O Personal Services O O O O X O X O Information Center Area O O O 1 O X X X O Telecommunications O 1 O O O X O X O Shared or Off -Site Parking O O O O O O X O Mixed Use X I L-Blank' ' = Strategies appropriate for this phase II Optional strategies = Infeasible or inappropriate strategies 17 TABLE 63 ti ...::. A..a .... .:..:..:.....::........::.:. c'.':. ........... .......... ;t,.;... }:...: .....:v:..'^�`5.: 6 .3�iw,vn..�::., p .1:.. �. :.i,. , ..... ...... . . . .. . . . .. . .. .. .. .. ........ .. .. D Carpooling X X X X X Vanpooling X X X X X Transit X X X X X Bicycle/Walk X X I X I X X Rideshare Subsidies X X X X Transit Subsidies X X X X Paid Parking X X X X X Reduced Parking Requirements X X X Preferential Parking X X X X X Extra Vacation ............... I X X X X Rideshare Matching X X X X X On-Site Coordinator X X X X X Commute Center/Area X X X X X Fairs/Promotions X X X X X Prizes/Giveaways X X X X X Guaranteed Ride Home X X X X X –Child Care X X X X X -M 1 ""...0 40 a M . ... .. .... Work Hours M X X X X C ompressed Work Weeks X X X X Te lecommuting X X X X . . . . . . .... . ............ . ....... ..... Pedestrian Access 0 0 0 0 X X X 0 Bicycle Facilities 0 0 0 0 X X X 0 Transit Access 0 0 0 0 X X X Rideshare Staging Areas 0 0 0 0 X X X —0 0 Personal Services 0 0 0 0 X X X 0 Information Center/Area 0 1 0 0 0 X X X 0 Telecommunications 0 1 0 0 0 X X X 0 Shared or Off -Site Parking 0 0 0 0 X X X 0 Mixed Use X 'X' = Strategies appropriate for this phase II "0* = Optional strategies 'Blank - Infeasible or inanoronriate stratra;&_q 18 In keeping with the philosophy of performance targets, no single set of techniques will work for every situation. Rather, employers must experiment with TDM to determine how it best fits into the corporate culture, benefits package, employee classifications and the physical setting. However, recent research has confirmed a few TDM techniques are clearly more effective than most -- parking controls and financial and time incentives. Therefore, while some employers will likely implement these more effective strategies, broadening participation to most employers will likely require prescribing specific actions in Phase 3. The matrices are not intended to be exhaustive or absolutely definitive, but rather provide a sense of the mix of techniques to be expected during each phase.. Other references are available which describe appropriate TDM techniques for various applications and implementation guidelines. The JPO and /or the member cities should develop such a list for inclusion in the regulatory requirements and develop specific guidelines for reviewing and approving plans and monitoring the effectiveness of various techniques. Public Sector Supporting Strategies The TDM analysis included several strategies that should be implemented by the public sector, related to the provision of enhanced alternatives and publicly- imposed incentives and disincentives. Regulatory administration and program assistance is discussed in the next section. The need for state and regional policies and programs was discussed in Section 1 and specific areas are support are summarized below by responsible party. State /Federal - State and federal funding sources will be needed to implement the reconstruction project and inclusion of an HOV network of lanes and by -pass on- ramps. State and federal funding may also be necessary for improving transit in the corridor. Finally, tax credits and exemptions for business and personal expenditures on vanpool acquisition and other alternatives should be considered. Regional /Local - Regional agencies (e.g. Met Council, MTC and RTB) and local cities should implement regional TDM strategies and regulations, a corridor -wide reconstruction mitigation program, improved transit services, parking surcharges (disincentives) or transit and vanpool subsidy matches (incentives) as appropriate. 19 7. IMPLICATIONS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR MODEL ORDINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION An integral part of the Strategic Plan for implementing TDM in the 494 corridor are requirements placed upon business to implement TDM techniques to reduce the number of a.m. peak hour vehicle trips generated in the area. These requirements would be enabled through trip reduction ordinances or policy statements enacted by each of the 5 member cities that participate in the Joint Powers Organization (JPO). Upon development of a clear consensus on the elements and goals of the Strategic Plan, a model ordinance will be developed for consideration by the JPO, elected officials, city staff, business and community leaders. The features of the ordinance and administrative and supporting functions are discussed below. A hypothetical example is provided in Appendix 3 of how one employer might comply under a program of this nature. Model Ordinance or Policy Statement The Strategic Plan elements outlined above suggest that a model ordinance be developed with the following features, as defined by the set of ordinance elements provided in the Product 1.0 report entitled TDM Strategy Assessment and Sample Trip Reduction Ordinance. Obviously, all the details necessary to implement the requirements cannot be provided in this plan. Specific details (e.g. treatment of part -time and contract employees in employer size) will need to be worked out in the model ordinance or in the administrative guidelines that will follow enactment. Flexibility The model ordinance should be flexible enough for cities to tailor and adopt as an ordinance or policy statement. As long as the overall target, basic requirements, and timing of the phasing are consistent across cities, the specific interim performance targets, administrative requirements, penalties and program support can differ between cities. The role of the JPO, in this case, would be to monitor each cities' relative contribution to the corridor -wide trip reduction target and mandate changes as appropriate. Application The ordinance should primarily apply to existing and future employers in each city, initially those employing 100 workers or more at a given site. The employer size threshold for the requirements will require trading off added trip reduction effectiveness for additionally administrative burden on the cities. Less stringent requirements or compliance through building owners and managers could be utilized for small employers. Since the impacts forecasted assume some participation among small employers, requirements will need to be defined for these groups. Additionally, requirements could be staggered so only larger employers, (100 or more) would need to fulfill the reporting requirements in Phase 1 and implemented for smaller employers in Phase 2. Developer 20 requirements should focus on site design improvements and may accomplished through the existing development review process or through the trip reduction ordinance. Targets Performance targets should be set to achieve the corridor -wide target of a 8 - 32% trip reduction against 2010 project levels, as determined through a consensus among the JPO members. The performance measure used should be easy to understand, reflect the trip reduction objectives, and account for use of alternative work arrangements. Interim performance targets, should be delineated in the ordinance by year and phase. As an example, a 3% trip reduction goal could be set for Phase 1, 5 -10% required in Phase 2 and 15 -20% required in Phase 3, as graduated on an annual or biennial scale. Phasing The imposition of requirements should be phased to coincide with the reconstruction and related mitigation program for 494 or some other pre - determined trigger. The first phase should impose site design requirements on developers as well as reporting requirements on existing employers and building owners. The performance targets should be initiated during phase 2 and a penalty and /or incentive scheme implemented. If reconstruction is delayed, level of service thresholds could trigger requirements in each city or corridor -wide. Finally, a stipulation will be made that if an employer is in non- compliance (i.e. not meeting the targets) or if the city is not contributing to area -wide targets, specific TDM techniques may,, need to be prescribed by the JPO or the cities. Administration The requirements will be enacted and enforced by each city. Administration of the program (education, plan review, approval, and notification) can be accomplished by the cities or the JPO. Filing fees for reporting requirements and penalties for non - compliance should be collected to off -set the administrative burden, the need for employer support and educational programs, and even the provisions of commute alternatives and subsidies. Compliance Compliance for employers can be tied to reaching performance targets or for implementing the provisions_ of an agreed -upon TDM plan. Incentives for meeting targets early or surpassing targets, such as reduced filing fees or trading trip reduction credits, should be considered. Developer and building owner compliance should be tied to implementation rather than performance. Compliance among cities should be tied to relative contribution toward the corridor -wide performance target. 21 Reporting Employers and building owners should be required to perform an annual or biennial survey of employees and report progress toward meeting required performance goals through trip reduction reports or TDM plans. A brief reporting form would be easier and less onerous, but a TDM plan would outline specific TDM measures utilized. Administrative, Legal and Program Requirements The model trip reduction ordinance passed for each member city could be administered by the cities, the JPO or some combination of the two. Six cities in San Mateo County, south of San Francisco, have formed an Interjurisdictional TSM Authority through a joint powers agreement and have all passed the same trip reduction ordinance. Legal authority and enforcement of the ordinance rests with the cities, but the program is administered by the staff of the TSM Authority. Clearly, the ordinance must pass the political and legal scrutiny of each city and the imposition of requirements, notification, enforcement, and adjudication must rest with the cities. Each city will likely need a half- 'to full -time planner or administrator to handle various functions, such as: developing a database of employers and their information, notification of employers and building owners, site plan review for new development, participating in training workshops, coordinating with the JPO and service providers, report and plan review and approval, program monitoring and enforcement, and adjudication. One clear role for cities is as a leader in implementing TDM programs for its employees. This sends a clear signal to the business community that the city is a partner in TDM. However, notification and enforcement can be coordinated through the JPO. Likewise, assistance to employers, developer and building owners, plan or report review, and compliance monitoring can be performed by the JPO staff or other service providers. If the requirements imposed by each city are significantly different, the usefulness of a centralized administrative function is diminished. However, at a minimum the JPO or some coordinating body should track the progress of each city toward corridor targets and suggest adjustments as appropriate. Other Program Support Support for the overall TDM program will need to come from a variety of sources. One area of support is in TDM policy. The Met Council, MinnDOT, and RTB should continue to support TDM as a policy in congested corridors and encourage other corridors and centers and meet regional TDM goals (1.3 AVO). A primary area of support, however, is in the area of assistance programs to employers, developers and building owners and managers. Key players include: Minnesota Rideshare - providing ride matching assistance, technical assistance in employee surveying, reporting and plan preparation, and other commute management services. Improve 494 - rejuvenation of the Transportation Management Organization (TMO) could be accomplished via mandatory participation, or preferably by establishing a 22 specific role for the TMO through plan preparation and submission or by allowing member employers to reach an aggregate target. Other service providers - such as private transit providers, vanpool vendors, contract staffing services, etc. will assist with the provision and promotion of commute alternatives. Key industry groups; such as the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA), can help educate businesses. Organizational Roles During Each Phase One possible framework for implementing the strategic plan would involve the following roles for key organizations: Phase 1: During the pre - reconstruction phase, employer reporting and education would be the primary focus. Each city would designate a planner (full or part-time depending on the number of 100+ employers and new .developments) to notify employers, review site plans and maintain a database of employer programs and baseline CAR. The JPO would coordinate the initiation of each city's program and assist MinnDOT (and Met Council and RTB) with the preparation of the mitigation plan for the reconstruction. Minnesota Rideshare and Improve .494 would jointly sponsor employer workshops explaining the ordinances and outlining a process for complying. These organizations would also provide one -on -one support to employers (hopefully TMO members) in surveying employees, preparing the baseline report and developing an initial plan. Phase 2: During reconstruction, as performance requirements are put in place, city staff responsibilities will increase as more detailed plan review, monitoring and enforcement are implemented. This can still likely be handled by a single planner or administrator. Notifying smaller firms and multi- tenant buildings and reviewing site plans will still be an integral part of the program. The JPO will work with each city to assure requirements are implemented in a timely fashion and monitor the results to assure each city is contributing to the corridor -wide target. Minnesota Rideshare, the MTC, the RTB, and other providers will implement improved services in a "394- style" program. Improve 494 will provide centralized services to members (such as ridematching, guaranteed ride home, inter - company vanpools, etc.) and work with employers to plan and enhance their in -house programs. Minnesota Rideshare will play an integral role with these services and a staff .person might be located at the TMO. Phase 3: The post - reconstruction period will reflect a routinization of the Phase 2 requirements. Each city and the JPO will examine which TDM strategies were most effective and determine if a more prescriptive set of requirements are necessary. Future traffic conditions may also warrant different targets, requirements and procedures. Improve 494 and Minnesota Rideshare will continue to provide services to employers and others, having solidified their role during reconstruction. 23 8. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ; The steps necessary to enact the ordinances and phase -in the requirements are broken into 4 distinct time periods, beginning in 1992. The starting year for any phase is contingent on the reconstruction schedule or other agreed -upon "trigger." 1992 -1993 Ordinance Approval 1993 -1997 Phase 1 - Pre - Construction 1995 -2010 Phase 2 - Reconstruction Mitigation 1997 -2010 Phase 3 - Post - Construction The implementation tasks included in each period and phase are outlined below. As a consensus is reached on the provisions and targets contained in the Strategic Plan, this implementation schedule can be modified as appropriate. After each task, the appropriate entities for implementing the task are identified with the lead entity listed first (acknowledging that a single lead will not always be possible). The abbreviations used include: JPO = I -494 Corridor Commission CTY = 5 cities on commission TMO = Improve 494 (Transportation Management Organization) MRS = Minnesota Rideshare RTB = Regional Transit Board MC = Met Council DOT = Minnesota Department of Transportation BUS Business Community CON = Consultant Ordinance Approval: 1992 - 1993 1. Develop a consensus on the TDM Strategic Plan (JPO, CTY) 2. Educate stakeholders and solicit their input (JPO, CTY, BUS, TMO, MRS, CON) 3. Draft a model ordinance or policy framework (CON, JPO) 4. Assure consistency with the preferred DEIS alternative (and related trip reduction targets and timing) and existing local ordinances (e.g. parking, zoning, etc.) (DOT, CTY, JPO) 5. Determine the role of existing, planned or needed regional /state policies and programs (MC, RTB, DOT, JPO) 24 6. Initiate coordination of regional /state policies with relevant agencies (MC, RTB, DOT, JPO) 7. Determine the appropriate administrative and support roles of cities, JPO and others (JPO, CTY, RTB; MC, TMO, MRS, CON) 8. Revise and finalize the TDM Strategic Plan (final run of TDM model) and model ordinance (CON, JPO, CTY, MC) • 9. Assist each city in tailoring an ordinance or policy statement (JPO, MC, CON) 10. Gather input from the business community and other stakeholders (JPO, BUS, TMO, MRS, CON) 11. Approve ordinances in all 5 cities (JPO, CTY) Pre- Construction Phase: 1993 - 1997 1. Educate businesses and employees of requirements (JPO, TMO, MRS, BUS, CTY) 2. Implement site design and other developer TDM program requirements (CTY, JPO, TMO) 3. Implement employer and building manager reporting requirement (CTY, JPO, TMO, MRS) 4. Provide TDM educational program throughout area (JPO, MRS, TMO, MC, DOT, RTB) 5. Provide assistance to employers, developers and building managers (TMO, MRS, JPO, CTY) 6. Evaluate innovative and effective TDM techniques (CTY, JPO, MC, RTB, DOT) 7. Assure complementary state /regional policies and programs are in place (MC, RTB, DOT, JPO, CTY) Reconstruction Mitigation Phase: 1995 - 2010 1. Plan and implement 394 -style reconstruction mitigation program (DOT, MC, RTB, MRS, JPO, CTY) 2. Assure commute alternatives are in place for mitigation program (DOT, MC, RTB, MRS, JPO, CTY) 25 3. Promote interim HOV lanes and improved commute alternatives (DOT, MRS, RTB, TMO, JPO) 4. Initiate employer performance targets and enforcement (CTY, JPO, BUS) 5. Assure all cities have initiated requirements by agreed -upon date (CTY, JPO) Post-Construction-Phase: 1997 - 2010 1. Evaluate the long -term impacts of mitigation phase (DOT, JPO, CTY, MC, RTB, BUS, TMO) 2. Assess each city's contribution to corridor target (JPO, CTY) .3. Modify requirements to prescribe specific techniques at a given site rather than specify a performance target only (JPO, CTY) 4. Modify each city's ordinance to increase effectiveness as necessary to achieve corridor -wide goals (CTY, JPO, MC) 26 f APPENDIX 1 TDM Impact Forecasts and Application to DEIS Alternatives TDM Strategies Analyzed In assisting with the development of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), COMSIS analyzed various packages of TDM actions using travel and employment forecasts developed for the DEIS process. While a more detailed description and discussion of the results of the analysis are provided in the Product 1.0 report entitled TDM Strategy Assessment and Sample Trip Reduction Ordinance, the set of TDM techniques analyzed as part of the DEIS TDM modeling effort is provided below: Commute Alternatives - designed to offer an alternative to driving alone. o New transit services or improvements to existing service o Carpooling o Vanpooling o Bicycling and walking Incentives - designed to off -set the overwhelming cost, time and convenience advantages of driving alone by offering time and costs incentives for the use of commute alternatives and disincentives or penalties for driving alone. o Time Incentives HOV lanes and by -pass ramps Preferential parking for HOVs o Cost Incentives Transit subsidies provided by the employer Transit fare discounts provided by government Rideshare subsidies for using commute alternatives o Cost Disincentives Parking charges for employees Parking taxes or surcharges imposed by government o Supporting Program Elements - On -site coordinator - Day care assistance - On -site amenities and "HOV friendly" facilities - Guaranteed ride home 27 Alternative Work Arrangements ments - work hours and work place strategies designed to move trips outside the peak period or remove trips altogether. o Flex -time o Staggered work hours o Compressed work weeks (4/40 or 9/80) o Telecommuting from home or a satellite work center Projected Impact of TDM in Corridor As part of the DEIS process, COMSIS forecasted the impact of implementing various packages of TDM strategies in the corridor in terms of vehicle trip reduction in 2010 over levels that would have occurred in the absence of TDM. A "medium" and "high" package of TDM measures was analyzed and applied to "new" development only and to new and existing "full" employment. The difference between the "medium" and "high' packages was generally the amount of time or cost incentive attributable to the technique as opposed to the mix of techniques. The strategies examined were classified into area -wide (government provided) and employer provided TDM measures, as follows: Area -wide TDM Techniques o HOV lane on I -494 o Transit service improvements o Transit fare reductions ( "high' only) o Parking surcharges or taxes ( "high' only) Employer TDM Techniques o Rideshare programs enhancements, including ride matching and promotion vanpooling alternative work hours o Transit fare subsidies o Preferential parking o Parking charges A key feature of the TDM model is the ability to project the impact of TDM strategies as implemented by different types and sizes of employers, so called participation rates. "New" employment refers to future office (office and industrial) and non - office (commercial /retail). "Full" employment refers to both future and existing commuters. As mentioned above, existing employment in the corridor it just over 150,000, with 115,000 employed in "office" and 35,000 in 'non -offim" According to information in the DEIS, this is projected to grow to 28 260,000, with 200,000 in "office - and 60,000 in inon- office." Distributing this existing versus new employment into four size categories produces the employment distribution summarized in Table A. The information summarized below was compiled by the Met Council and Improve 494 as part of the 3 area studies and concomitant employer and employee surveying. The percentages in the table refer to the proportion of employees, not employers. When analyzing TDM impacts, certain assumptions were made as to the proportion of employer types that would be expected to implement various TDM techniques. For example, under the "new" package of strategies almost all future employers (76- 100 %) would be expected to participate, while only a handful of existing employers might voluntarily implement techniques. Similarly, even under "full' mandatory conditions, not all (76 %) small employers (1 -49 employees) would be expected to participate as many sites would not be identified by the cities or simply would not participate. Table A Existing and 2010 Employment Distribution TYPE OF FIRM Number of Existing Future Existing Future Total Employees Office Office Non - Office Non - Office 1 -49 17.13% 12.15% 5.36% 3.81% 38.45% " 50 -99 5.19 3.68 1.61 1.14 11.62 100 -499 11.16 7.91 3.49 2.48 25.04 500+ 11.61 8.23 2.95 2.10 24.89 Total 45.09 31.97 13.41 9.53 100.00 After defining "medium" vs. "high" packages of strategies, and assigning participation rates among . "new" versus "full' employment, the TDM model was utilized to produce forecasts of the trip reduction potential of various scenarios. The analysis projected trip reduction impacts for each of 4 scenarios: "Medium" impact techniques applied to "new" development = 8% trip reduction "High" impact techniques applied to "new" development "Medium" impact techniques applied to "full" employment (New development and existing employers) "High" impact techniques applied to "full" employment (New development and existing employers) 29 18% trip reduction 20% trip reduction = 32% trip reduction Therefore, TDM was forecasted to have a range of trip reduction impacts of 8 -32 %, depending on the package of techniques implemented or the application to existing employment. It should be emphasized that even the 'medium" impact strategies involve far - reaching measures such as parking charges;. HOV lanes and subsidies which would have a profound effect on employers and policy- makers: Application of TDM Forecasts to DEIS Considering the TDM strategies apply to employees in the corridor that would use 494. as well as commuters using other highways and roads, the direct impact on 494 of a 8 -32% area -wide trip reduction is estimated to be 3 -11% on 494 itself, as revealed in Table B. Thus, TDM is estimated to reduce almost 11,000 daily trips (3 %) from a base of almost 390,000 assuming the medium package as applied to new development. The high impact case, the high package applied to full employment, would reduce almost 44,000 trips, or 11 %. The fact that many commute trips will not occur on 494 means the TDM programs would reduce 2 trips on other facilities for every trip reduced on 494 itself. This is a significant benefit of the TDM program as applied to each of the 5 cities in the corridor. The results of the TDM forecasting exercise are summarized in Table B for both corridor - wide trip reduction impacts and the resulting proportion of trips reduced on 494 itself. "New" refers to TDM requirements on new development only and "full' refers to requirements on new development and existing employers. Table B Summary of Trip Reduction Forecasts from TDM TDM Package Area -wide Reduction Reduction on 494 Medium /New 8% 3% Medium /Full ' 18% 6% High /New 20% 8% High /Full 32% 1 . 11% Once reductions possible from TDM were estimated, the results were applied to forecasts of future travel demand for the corridor and for 494. TDM estimates were then applied to determine the possible number of trips reduced from these future levels. TDM estimates were then applied to each of the 3 DEIS alternatives to determine the impact of traffic on each alternative and the ability to reduce trips via TDM. Such reductions, when assessed in conjunction with capacity improvements, could be used to analyze levels of service and the ability of TDM to improve service levels. While TDM is included in the DEIS as a mitigation measure only, this analysis is informative by revealing the relative impact of TDM when applied to the different alternatives. The alternatives can be summarized as: 30 (1) No Build (no improvements to 494) (2) TSM (minor improvements, no reconstruction) (3) Build: 1 lane or 2 lanes (in each direction) The Build alternative is further articulated with and without an HOV lane in each direction. For the purposes of assessing traffic level of service impacts, 3 three basic alternatives are analyzed with and without TDM reductions: No Build, TSM and Build. The overall impacts of TDM on these alternatives are discussed below: No Build - without TDM, the entire length of 494 will operate at Level of Service "F", i.e. at or above capacity. Implementing the high package of TDM options for all employment would not significantly change this situation. TSM - without TDM, the entire corridor would operate at capacity except for the segment between T.H. 62 and Valley View Dr. Implementing the most aggressive TDM program would bring several segments below capacity. Build - without TDM, the build alternatives (which may include HOV lanes) would operate at capacity from T.H. 169 to I -35W and near capacity on most other segments. With the least aggressive package (medium /new), the facility would operate at or near capacity on fewer segments and would flow smoothly in the Golden Triangle. Finally, with the most aggressive TDM package (high /full), only the portion between T.H. 169 and Penn Ave. would operate near capacity with all other segments flowing relatively smoothly. A simple summary, shown in Table C, of the impacts of TDM on the 3 primary alternatives provides information on the number of freeway segments that would operate near, at or above capacity with and without TDM. The total number of segments analyzed in the corridor is 15. As can be seen in the summary table the number of segment at or above capacity in 2010 is 14 out of 15 assuming no improvements and no TDM in the corridor. Conversely, assuming the build option, with HOV lanes, and the most aggressive TDM techniques for all employment, 12 segments operate below capacity and the rest near, but not at capacity. Without TDM, 4 segments would operate at capacity and 6 near capacity, even with a new general purpose lane and an HOV lane in each direction. Thus, TDM could play a critical role in maintaining reasonably uncongested conditions on I -494. Since for every trip removed on the highway is matched by two removed from other area roads, the ability of TDM to mitigate traffic growth in the area is significant. The TDM analysis performed on the DEIS alternatives uses the lowest and highest estimates to bound the estimated potential for TDM to reduce trips. Therefore, the DEIS assumes either the Medium /New package would be implemented in conjunction with the Build alternative, resulting in an area -wide trip reduction of 8% and a reduction on 494 of 3 %, or the High /Full package would be implemented in conjunction with the No Build, TSM or Build alternatives and result in a trip reduction of 32% area -wide or 11% on 494 itself. Clearly, some trip reduction target between these two extremes is probably optimal and will be set through the consensus building process set forth in this Strategic Plan. 31 Table C Impact of TDM on Level of Servii Below Capacijy (LOS C) No Build Alternative Without TDM With High /,Full TDM TSM Alternative Without TDM With High /Full TDM Build Alternative Without TDM With Medium /New TDM With High /Full TDM :e by Segment on I -494 Number of Segments Near At Above Caj2acijy Capaci1y Ca aci (LOS D) (LOS E) (LOS F) 0 1 9 5 2 0 10 3 0 3 12 0 3 4 8 0 5 6 4 0 9 3 3 0 12 3 0 0 32 APPENDIX 2 Glossary of TDM Strategies _ Bicycle Storage Facilities An area where bicycles used for commuting can be safely and securely kept during the work day -- ideally enclosed individual lockers or a covered area with bicycle racks. Bus Shelter A protected passenger waiting area at a bus stop location, preferably close to the entrance to the building, with posted route and schedule information for routes that serve the stop. Bus Turning Area Space near the building, in which transit buses (which require substantially greater maneuvering space) can turn. Bus Turnouts Temporary transit bus pick -up and drop -off locations outside the main traffic lanes- - can be adjacent to the main roadway or off the main roadway adjacent to the building entrance. Commuter Information Center or Area A center or area (corner), sponsored by a developer, property owner, or employer, that offers information on commute alternatives, serves as an outlet for transit pass sales, and administers other commute subsidy programs. This could involve a walk -in area in the coordinator's office or simply a "corner" in, for example, the. human resources department, building management office or employee lunch room._ Development Refers to any commercial or multifamily residential development or redevelopment of a site for uses such as shopping centers, employment centers, office buildings, retail complexes, business and technical parks, townhomes or a mixture of these uses. Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) A person selected by a company to promote commute alternatives. ETCs register employees for ridematching programs, coordinate formation of carpools and vanpools, promote the use of public transit, and track employees' participation in the program. Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) Program A program that provides guaranteed transportation by taxi, rental car or other method to employees who commute by carpool, vanpool, or public transit and need transportation during the day to handle a personal emergency or unplanned overtime. Information Kiosk or Board A free - standing, usually unattended, structure in which information on commute alternatives is displayed or vending center for bus tickets, etc. This could be as simple as a bulletin board in a high volume employee area or as involved as a kiosk with information, vending machines, even space for an attendant. 33 On -site Personal Services (Amenities) Services such as banks and automated teller machines (ATM), restaurants, child care centers, dry cleaners, and convenience shops, provided at an employment or residential development site to minimize the need for a personal vehicle to make trips for personal errands. Parking Demand Management Strategies such as parking fees and parking hour or day restrictions that limit the demand for single- occupant vehicle parking. Parking Supply Management Strategies that limit the supply of parking at an employment or residential site. They are most often implemented through local government policies that allow or require developers to construct an amount of parking that is less than would normally be required to accommodate parking demand at the site. Pedestrian Links to Complementary Land Uses Pedestrian walkways between residential, employment, and retail land uses to minimize the need fora car to move between the areas. Pedestrian Walkways Well-lit, visually attractive walkways on or between development -sites to encourage pedestrian movement on the sites -- should be physically separated from vehicular traffic. Preferential Parking Clearly marked parking spaces reserved for the use of carpools and vanpools, located in a preferred area such as close to the building entrance. Public Transportation Includes a wide variety of transportation services available to the public, including buses, park- and -ride facilities, and rail service. For purposes of this report, facilities to support buses, carpools, and vanpools are emphasized. Rideshare Matching The process of bringing together commuters whose home and employment locations and commuting patterns are similar, and who wish to travel together to work and home. Often done at an employment site by a company's ETC or in a geographic area by a government- sponsored regional ridesharing agency. Satellite Work Center Small, decentralized 'branch" office occupied by employees from one or more companies headquartered elsewhere. Centers are often equipped with shared office support facilities such as word processing, computer, and conference space. Centers are ideally located close to residential areas to minimize commute distances. Shared Parking Facilities Parking lots or garages that are used by tenants or patrons of two or more buildings. Use by one group of.parkers is often at a complementary time to that of another group, allowing maximum use of the space throughout the day. Example: a church parking lot used as a park & ride lot during weekdays. 34 Showers and Personal Lockers Lavatory/shower facilities and storage lockers for, use by commuters who bicycle or walk to work and wish to shower or change into different clothes before beginning work. Shuttle Buses Short distance transit services, typically operated on frequent schedules, and ,often linking residential, employment, and retail developments with each other and other local or regional transit services. Subsidies Financial - incentives or payments, such - as reduced transit fare passes, provided to ridesharing commuters to reduce the cost of shared commuting modes relative to that of driving alone. .Telecommunications Network Hardware and software needed to allow remote employment activities to be conducted -- could include heavy building wiring, data jacks, and fiber optic networks for example. Teleconferencing Center A meeting facility equipped with-voice, video, and data transmission equipment to accommodate remote communications and reduce the need for business travel. Center can be located within a single employers' office or in a multi -tenant building for use by numerous tenants. Transit Transfer Center A location within a development at which transit buses and or trains meet to allow passengers to transfer easily between routes or modes. Transportation Fairs (Displays) Commuter information events held in public areas to promote the use of non - single occupant vehicle commuting -- often accompanied by entertainment and "give - aways" to attract participants. Vanpool Garage Parking Clearance Vertical distance required for vans to enter and leave structured parking facilities -- typically greater than the clearance for cars. Vanpool Start-up Assistance Subsidies provided to vanpool drivers or riders to reduce the operating cost per passenger during the formation period of the vanpool by covering the cost of empty seats. Adapted from Mode Enhancement Through Land Use Design, Final Report, prepared by Stevens /Garland Associates, SR Associates and COMSIS for the County of San Diego, 1991. 35 APPENDIX 3 Hypothetical Employer Example A purely hypothetical example of how 1 employer might comply with the ordinance (assuming it evolves in a certain manner) provides a tangible illustration of the roles, timing and type of programs that might come about as a result of the TDM requirements. The example does draw from the 3 area studies conducted in the corridor in 1989 to formulate a realistic situation. The example also assumes the overall performance target set for the corridor is a Commute Alternatives Rate of 35% by the year 2010. The ordinance would be initiated with no targets, and then interim targets set during the reconstruction period of 25 %, 30% and 35 %. Obviously, the overall and interim targets may differ in the actual ordinance. Case History: Minnesota Widget June 1993 The CEO of Minnesota Widget, located in Bloomington near Normandale, is notified the newly passed Commute Alternatives Ordinance applies to Minnesota Widget (their corporate offices location) and receives instructions on how to comply. This is no surprise to Minnesota Widget because their V.P. of Human Resources had been active in workshops and hearings held in the corridor. Sept. 1993 Minnesota Widget designates an employee transportation coordinator (ETC), who attends a training seminar offered through Improve 494 and taught by Minnesota Rideshare and the TMO. The ETC learns how to survey its 300 employees, calculate the baseline Commute Alternatives Rate (CAR) and prepare the commute alternatives report required by Bloomington. Dec. 1993 The CAR coordinator for Bloomington receives the brief report and filing fee from Minnesota Widget. The report shows that Minnesota Widget has a baseline CAR of 10% (i.e. 10% of employees do not drive alone on a typical day). Minnesota Widget pledges to' educate employees and work with the TMO and Minnesota Rideshare to market alternatives to employees. Sept. 1995 After 2 years, the annual update shows Minnesota Widget's CAR has risen to 14 %. An effective mechanism for communicating options to employees has been established and the ETC and CEO of Minnesota Widget , are active in the TMO and work closely with TMO and Minnesota Rideshare staff. May 1996 The JPO recommends that Bloomington (and the 4 other cities) move into Phase 2 of the ordinance process as reconstruction on 494 is scheduled to begin in the Spring of 1997 and the mitigation plan calls for employer -based TDM programs to be in place by March. Bloomington informs Minnesota Widget a plan must be submitted outlining measures to increase its CAR to 25% (the initial city -wide target) by 1998. Thus, in 1996, Bloomington's TDM program transforms from simply reporting requirements to mandating performance targets be met. Plans are for increasing targets (25 %, 30 %, and 35 %) to be met in 2 year increments. 36 Aug. 1996 The Minnesota Widget ETC attends a seminar sponsored by the JPO and Improve 494 outlining the specifics of the mitigation plan and unveiling the following publicly - offered incentives or programs: increased express bus service to Southdale and a vanpool start -up subsidy funded by the RTB, a guaranteed ride home program funded by the TMO, and a shuttle bus service from Normandale to Southdale funded by the cities of Bloomington, Edina and the TMO. Nov. 1996 Minnesota Widget submits a detailed plan enumerating the elements of their enhanced CAR program, including a. commute alternative subsidy for all non -solo commuters, preferential parking spaces, the leasing of 2 vans, and the support of the Southdale shuttle through increased dues to the TMO. May 1998 Minnesota Widget's 1997 CAR update showed it had achieved a 22% non -drive alone rate and recommended increasing its CAR subsidy in order to meet the new target of 30 %. Minnesota Widget's "carpool challenge" program (offering an extra 2 days vacation for regular carpoolers) receives the TMO's annual excellence award. April 2000 With reconstruction half complete, Bloomington increases the CAR target to its final level at 35 %. Traffic on 494 is somewhat congested, but the expected spill -over to parallel arterials is not nearly ' as bad as anticipated. Minnesota Widget responds with a plan to institute paid parking in combination with a travel allowance. Employees are given 75% of the cost of a parking space which be applied to any mode. June 2001 Minnesota Widget's travel allowance has brought it's CAR up to 38 %, well above that of employers that simply began charging for parking. Employees perceive the ,allowance as a key part of their benefits package. The open parking spaces are now used. for a large auto detailing service provided by the company to carpoolers. Jan. 2004 With reconstruction having been completed in .2003, Bloomington maintains the CAR target at 35% and institutes a credit for programs that institute a travel allowance. Minnesota Widget retains its program, knowing that employees have come to expect the benefit and many cite it as a prime reason for coming to Minnesota Widget to produce the widget of the 21st Century. 37 APPENDIX 4 Overview of "394 - Style" Reconstruction Mitigation Program Integration of Reconstruction Mitigation and TDM Program This Strategic Plan ties implementation of employer and developer - provided TDM programs to the reconstruction of I -494 through the southwest portion of the Twin Cities. The programs mandated by the ordinance or policy adopted by each city will facilitate incentives (e.g. transit subsidies, carpool matching) that will induce employees and others to use alternatives to driving alone. The reconstruction project itself will involve a mitigation program that makes enhanced services and facilities (e.g. park- and -ride lots and improved bus service) available to those using commute alternatives. A prototypical mitigation program was implemented as part of the I -394 construction project. The I -494 reconstruction project will likely be modeled after that effort. During Phase 1 of the TDM requirements, local, regional and state planners will be developing the mitigation program and integrating the elements with each cities TDM policies. . Therefore, the key to the TDM program envisioned in this plan and the reconstruction mitigation activities is to encourage travelers to use commute alternatives through incentives, enhanced services and high - occupancy facilities. This involves a partnership of business and government. to assure success. Transportation agencies and service providers will provide enhanced TDM services and facilities during reconstruction; the cities will mandate employer and developer programs; and those affected businesses will promote and provide incentives for using commute alternatives. This assures that services are in place as commuters respond to incentives for their use. A summary of the I -394 mitigation program and a discussion of the likely elements for a I- 494 mitigation program follow. Summary of I -394 Mitigation Program In anticipation of the upgrading of Trunk Highway 12 to I -394, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) prepared a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Plan in 1983 to guide efforts to mitigate the disruption caused by the construction activities. A Corridor Management Team was formed with representatives of all parties involved. The key feature of the mitigation program was an interim HOV or commuter lane. The reversible lane was implemented in 1985 in 2 segments between I -494 and downtown Minneapolis. The lane was open to carpools with 2 or more occupants, vanpools and buses. As part of the TSM Plan, a number of other important supportive mitigation actions were taken, including: 0 2 free carpool parking lots were opened downtown with almost 600 spaces o public transit service was enhanced, including new express service o spaces were added at 1 of 6 park- and -ride lots o traffic enforcement was increased in the corridor o rideshare and mitigation program information campaigns were launched prior to the construction for travelers and employers 38 Data collected before and after implementation of the mitigation program suggests that the drive alone share decreased by 12 percentage points and carpooling increased by a like amount as users of the lane realized a time savings of 8 minutes. This resulted in an increase in vehicle occupancy from 1.17 to 1.29. Rather than carrying the same people in fewer vehicles, both commuters and cars increased as improved travel conditions diverted trips to the highway. Implications for a I -494 Reconstruction Mitigation Program A "394 - Style" mitigation program for the I -494 reconstruction project would like be very similar to the TSM Plan described above, with a few exceptions: (1) Interim HOV lanes may be implemented in both the 494 and 35W corridors, enhancing both east -west and north -south commuting patterns (2) The lack of a dominant employment center and directional traffic flow make the use of carpool parking lots and express bus service less feasible (3) Improvements to transit service might focus on existing and emerging transit centers at Ridgedale, Eden Prairie Center, Southdale and the Mall of America (4) Information and management of adjacent and parallel route for commuting may be a key part of the mitigation plan (5) Required employer participation in TDM programs will foster incentives for employees traveling to work sites in the corridor to use alternatives This final difference is significant. Whereas the I -394 program relied on parking cost savings provided at the downtown ramps, and improved services, the I -494 program will rely on employer -based incentives to a far greater degree. Commuters traveling through the corridor can benefit from the time saving afforded by the HOV lanes, but employees working in the corridor can benefit from time savings and the time and cost savings offered through employers. These time and cost savings might include flex -time and preferential . parking to decreasing commuting time and financial incentives for ridesharing or riding the bus. The planning for the 494 reconstruction mitigation program will likely require a corridor management team (that might evolve out of the EIS Project Management Team) and one or more years to accomplish. As such, it is beyond the scope of this plan to outline the program. Rather, the information provided above will give decision - makers involved in enacting or implementing TDM policies a notion of the synergy possible by tying employer requirements to reconstruction mitigation. 39 C REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager VIA: Kenneth Rosiand, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 4 M 1992 DATE ay . AGENDA ITEM y. A. & B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Insurance Renewals — Police Professionals & Public Officials Liability Company Amount of Quote or Bid y, SEE OTHER SIDE 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: GENERAL INFORMATION: This year the agent, Dave Crowther of the Harris— Homeyer Agency, repre- sented the City for obtaining quotes of Public Officials and Police Professional Liability and contacted a number of underwriters. All of them indicated that they were not interested -in quoting this type of coverage because they could not be competitive with the quotes from the Scottsdale Insurance'Company. Therefore, they.did not receive any alternative quotes. (OVER) Administration Signature Dept The Recommended bid is within budget not within budget John Kenneth Roslan City J�"- Once Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Agenda Item V.A. (Continued) As we did for the last year, I am recommending that we renew our coverage with the Scottsdale Insurance Company. If a more favorable quotation is received as part of the renewal process for other insurance coverages in July, we can take the lower premium at that time. Public Officials Police Professionals Company Liability Liability Scottsdale Insurance Company $ 11,523.47 $ 27,527.00 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman', Director of Public Works VIA: - - Kenneth Rosland City Manager !!�� SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 4 May, 1992 AGENDA ITEM v . C . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Emergency Repair - Loadal Truck, Company Amount of Quote or Bid Ziegler, Inc. 1. $ 5,467.71 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ziegler, Inc. $ 5,467.71 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a repair order for two of our loadal units (pickup systems for debris). The original estimate was under $5,000.00 and as such did not require prior Council approval. The actual repair cost is as stated above and therefore, requires Council approval prior to payment of claim. Si ature The Recommended bid is — within budget nc Public Works - Equipment Operation 491N�1r1\ e �,1 J �• V Jj; REPORT /RECOMMENDATION j To: Mayor & City Council !From: Ken Rosland City Manager Date: -4 May, 1992 Subject: Cemstone Request for . Lease Operation Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Review of proposed lease arrangements by Cemstone. This approval is subject to Cemstone Products obtaining any other governmental agency approvals that are necessary, if required. Info /Background: Cemstone Products Company has submitted additional information for review on their request to use City property to set up a concrete patch plant. This proposal was made after review of the issues by the Mayor and City staff with Cemstone during the week of April 27, 1992. April 30, 1992 Mr. Ken Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Rosland: I want to thank you for taking the time to meet with us on Monday morning on our proposal to lease city property for three years for the purpose of establishing a ready mix concrete plant. We understand all of your concerns and I believe that you will see by the following review that Cemstone will address your concerns to your satisfaction. Cemstone has had experience in establishing and operating temporary ready mix facilities in metro communities and pride ourselves in our ability to operate these plants within the guideline of the communities we are in. Following is a recap of the issues that were discussed and what Cemstone is proposing to the City of Edina in each case. 1. The length of the lease would be from May 15, 1991 through November 15, 1994. 2. Cemstone is proposing a rental payment of $15,000 for year 1 with the payment on November 1, 1992 and $20,000 for year 2 with a payment date of July 1 and $24,000 for year 3 with.a payment date of July 1, 1994. The total rent for the 2 1/2 years would be $59,000 or an annualized rate of $23,600. Cemstone reviewed the rental cost based on the potential yardage the plant could produce only operating during the warmer months of the year and what we see as potential jobs that we may get near the location of the plant. We are requesting this payment schedual because of the up front site preparation of approximately $40,000, plus attorney fees and documentation costs. 3. Attached you will find my letter dated April 24, 1992 which outlines the proposed site improvements. 4. Cemstone is agreeable to contract wording that would include an indemnification of the city and a process that would allow termination of the contract after proper notification and opportunity to correct any deficiencies. 5. Cemstone would agree to one of the two options to be determined by the city prior to the end of the contract. Either Cemstone would reclaim the site according to the current plan proposed by the city staff or the payment of $5,000 to the city and the city would rework the site for their own purpose. CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 2025 Centre Pointe Boulevara. Suite 300 • Mendota Heights. Minnesota 55120 (612) 688 -9292 • FAX: (612) 688 -0124 • MN WATS: (800) 642 -3887 J� 6. Cemstone will construct the -site in such a method as to prevent any run off water draining directly into Nine Mile Creek. 7. The plant would be open for operation from 6:00 A.M. until 6:00 P.M. If it should become necessary to have extended hours of operation to meet a construction deadline we would notify the city manager in each case. 8. Cemstone would be responsible for any taxes and attorney fees of the city attorney that relate to the contract preperation. If you should have any questions on the above I will be happy to answer them for you. Thank you for considering our proposal. Sincerely, Ti Becken Cemstone Products Company CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 2025 Centre Pointe Boulevard, Suite 300 • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 (612) 688 -9292 • FAX: (612) 688 -0124 • MN WATS: (800) 642 -3887 April 24. 1992 Fran Hoffman Citv Engineer Citv of, Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina. N'linnesota 5424 Dear Fran. I wanted to break out the associated costs for this project. 1. Clear trees and remove wood debris - $4,600.00 2. Furnish, place and compact a three (3) foot laver of select granular material - $23,800.00 3. Furnish and place silt fence - $3,000.00 4. Furnish, place and compact limestone base surface - $7,600.00 S. We will also incur significant moving costs including electrical hook ups, water hook ups and other miscellaneous costs. 6. All of these costs are out of pocket costs. Sincerelv. Tim Becken Cemstone Products Companv TB:gs CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 2025 Centre Pointe Boulevard. Suite 300 • Mendota Heights. Minnesota 55120 (612) 688 -9292 • FAX: (612) 688 -0124 • MN WATS: (800) 642 -3887 113A. ,�f f e c1 '�ib11.01M� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman �' ✓ /� City Engineer Date: 4 May, 1992 Subject: Bridge Repair & Overlay Benton Avenue Bridge over Soo Line Railroad Tracks Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.B. Consent Y Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Cou Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolut El Ordinan Authorize bids for Benton Avenue bridge repair. 'Info /Background: ncil ion ce The proposed project is to repair the surface on the Benton Avenue bridge. The project would be to mill off the top surface and then make the identified repairs on the deck. The deck would be resurfaced as the final step. This bridge was built in 1968 and only has required minor repairs to this point. We have reached the point where costs to repair would escalate dramatically if this type of project were not done. This project was originally programmed in our capital improvement plan for 1991. The estimated cost for this project is $46,522.20. The funding for this project would be state aid maintenance funds. Staff recommends authorizing bids for this project. ae. rill REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda item # From: Ceil Smith Consent Information Only Date: 'fay 4, 1992 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Insurance Renewals Subject: - � To Council Action Motion Resolution Ordinance Recommendation: See Attached letter. Info /Background: Attached is a letter that I received from Dave Crowther of the Harris- Homev_er Company. Mr. Crowther will be present at your meeting to answer questions you may have concerning insurance renewals. As you may recall, last year two other brokers in addition to Harris- Homever sought quotations on behalf of the City for its automobile, general liability_ and worker's compensation. One of the brokers is the largest in the world (Marsh McLennan), and of all the quotes received, the most economically feasible was the program we have been on since 1982 -83 with Home Insurance. Thus far this year I have not received any proposals from other brokers and do not anticipate that I will receive any to seek quotes on the City's behalf. f1I1 "1 Harris•Homeyer Compare/ 6161 Wooddale Ave.. Suite 101 P.O. Box 24030 Edina. Minnesota 55424 612 - 922 -0301 Fax 612- 922 -7547 April 21, 1992 Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ceil, William P. Homeyer. CPCU ", John R. Harris. CPCU Douglas H. Crowther David W. Crowther Timothy S. Gonsior As you are aware, the City's automobile, general liability and workers' compensation program through Home Insurance Company will expire on July 1, 1992. At this time we would recommend that the City begin negotiations with Home with the expressed purpose of renewing coverage with this market. Ceil, there are several reasons why we feel this direction is appropriate. First, an extensive market search was conducted last year, including efforts by other agents and brokers. The Home remained the most attractive source for coverage, as it has for the past ten years. Second, we are only aware of one new municipal program, and that is underwritten by the St. Paul Companies. We have approached the St. Paul each of the past three years, Ceil, and they have not quoted terms, within 100% of the Home. Finally, we feel that we will not gain the sincere interest of those additional underwriters who have also seen your account for the last three years. The Home has indicated that rates will not vary dramatically, so our suggestion is to give the marketplace a "rest" (and re -enter only at such time as a significant development occurs i.e., new insurance capacity, or the Home changes it view of your account). Bill and I would be happy to meet with you and Ken and /or the City Council to discuss this in more detail. Please give this recommendation your consideration and let us know your thoughts. Thanks Ceil. Best Regards, David Crowther LTRO594 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM $69.94 ALTERNATOR REBUILD page 1 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # 126669 05/04/92 $204.00 AMER. PHOTO COPY 3M CO SIGNS TP45327 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 9804 < *> $352.72 $204:00* AMERICAN BUSINESS FO < *> $352.72* 126682 126670 05/04/92 $42.00 AMERICAN RED CROSS AARESTED, DRU AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 126683 05/04/92 05/04/92 $17.85 AMERICAN SHARECOM AARESTED, DRU ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS 126684 < *> $493.72 $59.85* AQUA ENGINEERING 05/04/92 $62.39 AQUA ENGINEERING 126671 05/04/92 $3.85 AQUA ENGINEERING AASEN, LAURIE MILEAGE /METER READER 042792 METER READING MILEAGE 126685 < *> $16,055.00 $3.85* ASSOCIATED POOL BUIL < *> $16,055.00* 126672 05/04/92 $12.56 ACE SUPPLY PIPE /NUT 0191710 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 1028 < *> $12.56* 126673 05/04/92 $443.62 ACTION MAILING SERV MAGAZINE 003442 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET E < *> $443.62* 126674 05/04/92 $195.71 ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICES 04725804 BUILDING & GRO ALARM SERVICE <*> $195.71* 126675 05/04/92 $216.07 AIR I'YDRAULIC SYSTEM COUPLING A 1 -5204 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1163 < *> $216.07* 126676 05/04/92 $287.94 ALBINSON PRINT PAPER 107709 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 9638 < *> $287.94* 126677 05/04/92 $464.00 ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO TV /VCR 101096 -0 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACE 8623 < *> $464.00* 126678 05/04/92 $579.00 ALSTAD, MARIAN AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $579.00* 126679 05/04/92 $69.94 ALTERNATOR REBUILD 05/04/92 $150.84 ALTERNATOR REBUILD < *> $220.78* 126680 05/04/92 $265.00 AMER. PHOTO COPY < *> $265.00* 126681 05/04/92 $352.72 AMERICAN BUSINESS FO < *> $352.72* 126682 05/04/92 $50.00 AMERICAN RED CROSS < *> $50.00* 126683 05/04/92 $164.45 AMERICAN SHARECOM < *> $164.45* 126684 05/04/92 $493.72 AQUA ENGINEERING 05/04/92 $62.39 AQUA ENGINEERING 05/04/92 $248.89 AQUA ENGINEERING < *> $805.00* 126685 05/04/92 $16,055.00 ASSOCIATED POOL BUIL < *> $16,055.00* BUSHING VALVE 007709 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1040 BATTERY /FLASHLIGHT 007708 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPM 1030 EQUIPMENT MAINT 105305 1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 1364 PATRON CARD APPLICATI 210611 ADMINISTRATION PRINTING 1065 CPR COURSE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONSTRUCTION 6156 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCR 1221 041592 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 32486 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 1050 32491 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 1144 32500 SNOW & ICE REM REPAIR PARTS 1160 APRIL POOL CIP CIP COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 2 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126686 05/04/92 $60.00 ATOM ATOM SPRING CONFERENC 041792 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $60.00* 126687 05/04/92 $35.00 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR ALIGN FRONT END -11864 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1151 < *> $35.00* 126688 05/04/92 $14.76 AXT -LYLE VENDING PRODUCT 041592 GUN RANGE CST OF GD F00 < *> $14.76* 126689 05/04/92 $42.00 BACON'S ELECTRIC CO MATERIAL 0018273- PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 1325 < *> $42.00* 126690 05/04/92 $178.00 BAILEY NURSERIES ROSES FOR FLOWER CLUB 000181 -0 GENERAL TURF C PLANT & TREES 1391 < *> $178.00* 126691 05/04/92 $65.00 BALDINGER, WENDY PERFORMANCE CL 6/20/9 062092 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $65.00* 126692 05/04/92. $89.69 BANKSYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 007323 YORK SELLING OFFICE SUPPLI < *> $89.69* 126693 05/04/92 $2,805.90 BANNER CREATIONS BANNERS 70888 CONSTRUCT PROG CIP 9632 < *> $2,805.90* 126694 05/04/92 $100.00 BARNHART, NORM PERFORMANCE CL 6/27/9 041792 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 126695 05/04/92 $48.00 BARTON, MARY CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $48.00* 126696 05/04/92 $34.98 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BLOWER MOTOR 174065 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1162 05/04/92 $77.88 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 176206 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1421 < *> $112.86* 126697 05/04/92 $133.90 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 033192 GOLF DOME CST OF GDS BE 9028 < *> $133.90* 126698 05/04/92 $85.00 BELL, BRUCE MENIER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5/21/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER <*> $85.00* 126999 05/04/92 $26.50 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 713449 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $26.50 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 713450 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $15.00 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 733271 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $68.00* 126700 05/04/92 $147.50 BERGFORD'TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 040992 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ 05/04/92 $278.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 040992 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 05/04/92 $276.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 040992 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ < *> $702.50* 126701 05/04/92 $297.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 764713 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 9850 05/04/92 $67.31 BERTELSON BROS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 772269 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLI 1181 05/04/92 $160.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 773619 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $152.42 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 775272 CENT SVC GENER OFFICE SUPPLI 05/04/92 $22.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. COPIER LABELS 775293 JUDGES - SCHOOL GENERAL SUPPL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 3 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # 126701 05/04/92 $20.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 775273 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $76.48 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 776116 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL < *> $797.94* 126702 05/04/92 $141.00 BLEDSOE, SARA AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $141.00* 126703 05/04/92 $90.00 BOGLE, BETH AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 126704 05/04/92 $9.58 BOYER TRUCKS LATCH 120000X1 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1149 05/04/92 $20.83 BOYER TRUCKS CAP 123392 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1052 05/04/92 $153.92 BOYER TRUCKS AX SHAFT 123584 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1139 05/04/92 $272.82 BOYER TRUCKS PIN /BRACKET 125703 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1319 05/04/92 $177.79 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 125522 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1313 < *> $634.94* 126705 05/04/92 $190.00 BRADLEY BENN PARK & REC MAINT 042692 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 05/04/92 $110.00 BRADLEY BENN AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* 126706 05/04/92 $157.06 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GL DOOR REPAIR M23539 -0 STREET REVOLVI CONTR REPAIRS < *> $157.06* 126707 05/04/92 $69.30 BROCKWAY. MAUREEN ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $69.30* 126708 05/04/92 $75.00 BROM, BECKY PERFORMANCE CL 07/09/ 070992 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER 05/04/92 $75.00 BROM, BECKY PERFORMANCE CL 6/27/9 062792 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $150.00* 126709 05/04/92 $47.45 BRUMFIELD ADRIANE CRAFT SUPPLIES 124477 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 1081 05/04/92 $30.00 BRUMFIELD ADRIANE AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $62.30 BRUMFIELD ADRIANE ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $139.75* 126710 05/04/92 $267.01 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC BALLFIELD MIXTURE 15APR92 FIELD MAINTENA INFIELD MIX 1272 < *> $267.01* 126711 05/04/92 $360.00 BRYANT, BETSY AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $360.00* 126712 05/04/92 $1,050.00 BUDGET TREE MOVERS 3 SPRUCE PLANTED 0126 MAINT OF COURS PLANT & TREES 7645 < *> $1,050.00* 126713 05/04/92 $184.50 BUIE, ROBERT CONT ED 042092 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $184.50* 126714 05/04/92 $75.00 BURTIS, ROBERT PERFORMANCE CL 8/1/92 080192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 126715 05/04/92 $202.22 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD 135981 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOO 9932 < *> $202.22* 126716 05/04/92 $14.00 CARLSNESS, LINDSAY CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 4 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------- <*> $14.00* 126717 05/04/92 $183.74 CARLSON STORE FIX CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 54668 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 1232 < *> $183.74* 126718 05/04/92 $90.74 CATCO VALVE 390449 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1168 < *> $90.74* 126719 05/04/92 $102.66 CDP MACHINE RENTAL 01520730 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL < *> $102.66* 126720 05/04/92 $143.69 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 032392 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL 1431 05/04/92 $71.16 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 042292 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCR 05/04/92 $21.32 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 042292 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $77.25 CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 042292 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 8572 05/04/92 $38.92 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 042292 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 05/04/92 $66.47 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 042292 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 05/04/92 $133.89 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 042292 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 05/04/92 $1,350.40 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 042292 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL < *> $1,903.10* 126721 05/04/92 $480.00 CHARLES YESCHKE ASSO PRO SERVICES 92011049 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $480.00* 126722 05/04/92 $375.72 CHEM CONCEPTS PAINT 0527 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 1584 < *> 5375.72* 126723 05/04/92 $140.00 CITY BEER BEER 033192 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $140.00* 126724 05/04/92 $30.56 CITY OF EDINA WATER 2246 -225 VERNON OCCUPAN SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $334.25 CITY OF EDINA WATER 19312 -19 PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $30.56 CITY OF EDINA WATER 132 -138E PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $53.48 CITY OF EDINA WATER 365 -393 50TH ST OCCUPA SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $152.80 CITY OF EDINA WATER 26275 -26 CITY HALL GENE SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $30.56 CITY OF EDINA WATER 952 -959 BUILDING MAINT SEWER & WATER 05/04/92 $185.00 CITY OF EDINA REFUSE 001526 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOV < *> $817.21* 126725 05/04/92 $217.41 CITY OF ROSEVILLE MLC DINNER 2925 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN < *> $217.41* 126726 05/04/92 $166.60 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 109692 ADMINISTRATION ADVERT OTHER < *> $166.60* 126727 05/04/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 30249 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS - 05/04/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 30250 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 05/04/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 30251 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $40.50* 126728 05/04/92 $48.25 CORNER MARKING CO SUPPLIES 04774 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLI 1136 < *> $48.25* 126729 05/04/92 $145.88 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. SHAFT /SHEAR PIN 52356 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9170 05/04/92 $59.13 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 52963 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9964 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 5 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $205.01* 126730 05/04/92 $137.16 CYLINDER CITY REPAIR PARTS 38132 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9977 < *> $137.16* 126731 05/04/92 $100.80 D.C. HEY CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 55817A 1 ART CENTER BLD CONTR REPAIRS 1076 05/04/92 $30.00 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 271634 ADMINISTRATION SVC CONTR EQU < *> $130.80* 126732 05/04/92 $215.72 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 03 &0492 GRILL CST OF GD F00 9030 < *> $215.72* 126733 05/04/92 $37.00 DECKER, HERB ELECTION SIGNS 042192 ELECTION PRINTING < *> $37.00* 126734 05/04/92 $5,525.00 DECORATING DENNIS PA PAINT /SR CENTER 041492 PARKS CIP 1307 < *> $5,525.00* 126735 05/04/92 $2,715.80 DELTA DENTAL PREMIUM 03184305 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $2,715.80* 126736 05/04/92 $397.00 DELTA FOREMOST CHEMI CLEANING 467425 GRILL CLEANING SUPP 1413 < *> $397.00* 126737 05/04/92 $842.00 DICKER, TOBIE AC INSTRUTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $102.00 DICKER, TOBIE PT MAINT 042692 ART CENTER BLD SALARIES TEMP 05/04/92 $85.40 DICKER, TOBIE ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $1,029.40* 126738 05/04/92 $247.13 DICTAPHONE CORP SERVICE CONTRACT P455105 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQU 1016 < *> 5247.13* 126739 05/04/92 $468.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC INSTRUCOTR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $468.00* 126740 05/04/92 $23.92 DISPATCH COMM /MN CRIMPER 96062 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS < *> $23.92* 126741 05/04/92 $145.00 DIVERSIFIED CLEANING CARPET CLEANED 1083 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $145.00* 126742 05/04/92 $12.69 DOALL TWIN CITIES CO SCOTCH BRITE HANDSPAD 02312968 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 9972 05/04/92 $489.44 DOALL TWIN CITIES CO LOCK /VISE JAW 02312995 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 9972 < *> $502.13* 126743 05/04/92 $156.00 DON WENDLING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2800 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 1417 < *> $156.00* 126744 05/04/92 $670.00 DOOR SERVICE COMPANY DORR REPLACE 29192 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS 1113 < *> $670.00* 126745 05/04/92 $189.50 DUMAS PRODUCTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 4 -499 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 1301 < *> $189.50* 126746 05/04/92 $537.86 E KRAEMER & SONS INC SUPPLIES 24751 DISTRIBUTION FILL MATERIAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 6 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126746 05/04/92 $538.62 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 24925 MAINT OF COURS SAND,GRVL & R < *> $1,076.48* 126747 05/04/92 $309.46 E -Z -GO TEXTRON GOLF CAR PARTS 0213237 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1099 05/04/92 $152.95 E -Z -GO TEXTRON GOLF CART PARTS 0214141 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1293 05/04/92 $68.00 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART REPAIR PARTS 0217850 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1294 05/04/92 $38.75 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS /CARTS 0221392 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1435 05/04/92 $184.94 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART PARTS 0221391 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1433 < *> $754.10* e 126748 05/04/92 $22.27 EAGLE WINE MIX 558004 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI <*> $22.27* 126749 05/04/92 $302.10 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS FOR PARK 00113747 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 1430 05/04/92 $249.68 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN 00113787 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 9986 05/04/92 $98.17 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 00113830 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 1017 < *> $649.95* 126750 05/04/92 $289.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE MIX 040192 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $8,212.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 040192, VERNON-SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $8,501.80* 126751 05/04/92 $17.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 91751 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE < *> $17.75* 126752 05/04/92 $50.00 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 05/17/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 126753 05/04/92 $15.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER LUNCH 041592 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN < *> $15.00* 126754 05/04/92 $437.45 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CULTURAL EXPO 040992 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRG < *> $437.45* 126755 05/04/92 $464.96 ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. REPAIRS 155676 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 1482 < *> $464.96* 126756 05/04/92 $119.53 EMER MED. PRODUCTS AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 106334 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 9551 < *> $119.53* 126757 05/04/92 $300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES MAY CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPL < *> $300.00* 126758 05/04/92 $46.98 ENGER, DON CONT ED 041792 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $46.98* 126759 05/04/92 $2,900.00 ESS BROS & SONS ADJUSTMENT RINGS 004973 SEWER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1176 05/04/92 $135.00 ESS BROS & SONS ADJUSTING RINGS 005005 GENERAL STORM CASTINGS 1383 < *> $3,035.00* 126760 05/04/92 $72.22 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO PRINTING 04452 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 1078 < *> $72.22* 126761 05/04/92 $129.00 FAST FRAME GENERAL SUPPLIES 946776 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $129.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 7 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7--------------------------------- 126762 05/04/92 $25.72 FLANDERS, WALLY ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $25.72* 126763 05/04/92 $1,490.00 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO SECURITY CAMERA SYSTE A 54591 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP 9802 < *> $1,490.00* 12676405/04/92 $1,732.06 FORTIS BENEFITS PREMIUM 042392 CENT SVC GENER LNG TRM DISAB < *> $1,732.06* 126765 05/04/92 $136.00 FOWLER ELECTRIC CLUTCH GOLF CAR 410700 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1297 < *> $136.00* 126766 05/04/92 $25.00 FRANZEN, CAROL REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 042492 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION < *> $25.00* 126767 05/04/92 $168.00 FRIDEN ALCATEL MAINTENANCE M3063422 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $168.00* 126768 05/04/92 $1,714.50 GABBERT & BECK REFUND 3510 W 70TH ST 041092 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. < *> $1,714.50* 126769 05/04/92 $300.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* 126770 05/04/92 $693.15 GENCORP POLYMER PROD TENNIS BALLS 4006 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPL 1074 < *> $693.15* 126771 05/04/92 $100.00 GENERAL GROWTH MANAG RENT 042292 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACE < *> $100.00* 126772 05/04/92 $171.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 22574670 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL 1426 < *> $171.00* 126773 05/04/92 $1,101.00 GEREBI, LIZ PRO SERVICES 041792 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $1,101.00* 126774 05/04/92 $523.52 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO & TARGETS FOR GU 03827 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 1409 < *> $523.52* 126775 05/04/92 $131.00 GILLIS, LOUISE AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $131.00* 126776 05/04/92 $47.25 GOPHER CASH REGISTER SUPPLIES 13426 RANGE GENERAL SUPPL 1218 05/04/92 $437.50 GOPHER CASH REGISTER CASH REGISTER 13467 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 1349 < *> $484.75* 126777 05/04/92 $88.00 GOPHER SIGN CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 47658 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 9759 < *> $88.00* 126778 05/04/92 $45.08 GRANQUIST, THELMA ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $45.08* 126779 05/04/92 $288.00 GRAPP, JEAN AC INSTRUCOTR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $288.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 8 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT. VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 126780 05/04/92 $49.00 GREENWOOD, JULIE ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $49.00* 126781 05/04/92 $6,958.00 GREUPNER, JOE MAY GOLF LESSONS 042892 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $6,958.00* 126782 05/04/92 $50.00 GROTH, DAVID SKATING REFUND 042392 ICE ARENA PROG REGISTRATION < *> $50.00* 126783 05/04/92 $16,314.16 GROUP HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM 040392 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $16,314.16* 126784 05/04/92 $436.00 GUST, MARGARET AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $436.00* 126785 05/04/92 $15.00 HALVORSON, JIM CERTIFICATION EXAM' 041692 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $15.00* 126786 05/04/92 $75.60 HANLON, NORMA ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $75.60* 126787 05/04/92 $70.20 HARDACKER, BETTY CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $70.20* 126788 05/04/92 $216.09 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 72001459 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1142 < *> $216.09* 126789.05/04/92 $48.00 HAVENS, JANET CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $48.00* 126790 05/04/92 $192.00 HAYWA, PHYLLIS AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $192.00* 126791 05/04/92 $100.00 HEAD, CURTIS PERFORMANCE CL 05/02/ 050292 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 126792 05/04/92 $173.00 HEIM, HARRY AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $173.00* 126793 05/04/92 $489.60 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 040192 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 9033 < *> $489.60* 126794 05/04/92 $143.64 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER WORKHOUSE /JAIL MARCH 19 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRIS < *> $143.64* 126795 05/04/92 $110.70 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA HAUL BRUSH 20735 MAINT OF COURS CONTR REPAIRS 9761 < *> $110.70* 126796 05/04/92 $5,387.05 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA WORKHOUSE JAIL 000611 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRIS < *> $5,387.05* 126797 05/04/92 $16,224.97 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 042292 SPECIAL ASSESS EQUIP REPLACE < *> $16,224.97* 126793 05/04/92 $1,871.62 HERMAN MILLER INC. SR CENTER FURNITURE 738301 PARKS CIP 8723 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 9 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # <*> $1,871.62* 126799 05/04/92 $1,552.00 HERNANDEZ, LUIS REFEREE SOCCER LEAGUE 0423 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES < *> $1,552.00* 126800 05/04/92 $25.00 HINDS, RYAN REFUND SKATING LESSON 041792 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM I < *> $25.00* 126801 05/04/92 $100.00 HINSETH, BRAD PERFORMANCE CL 05/26/ 052692 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 126802 05/04/92 $375.00 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M FIELD MARKING PAINT 00023135 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POW 1034 < *> 8375.00* 126803 05/04/92 $119.00 HITM DIGITAL THERMOMETER 042192 PUBLIC HEALTH EQUIP REPLACE < *> $119.00* 126804 05/04/92 $29.25 HODGES, JOAN CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $29.25* 126805 05/04/92 $50.00 HOLTZ, JULIE PERFORMANCE CL 07/11/ 071192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 126806 05/04/92 $448.00 HORWATH, TOM FORESTRY 042192 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $528.00 HORWATH, TOM TRIMMING 042192 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES < *> $976.00* 126807 05/04/92 $95.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIRS 040192 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1043 05/04/92 $28.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR RADIATOR 040892 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1167 05/04/92 $28.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIR RADIATOR 1243 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1243 < *> $152.00* 126808 05/04/92 $62.00 HUNTLEY, BONNIE CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $62.00* 126809 05/04/92 $4,742.40 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METER 4528 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WAT 8536 05/04/92 $112.50 HYDRO SUPPLY CO METER PARTS 4525 METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 8536 05/04/92 $3,999.00 HYDRO SUPPLY_ CO WATER METERS 4540 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WAT 8536 05/04/92 $55.25 HYDRO SUPPLY CO METER PARTS 4555 METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 8536 05/04/92 $729.60 HYDRO SUPPLY CO METER PARTS 4556 METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 8536 < *> $9,638.75* 126810 05/04/92 $1,890.00 IBM DATA PROCESSING OIFF550 FIRE DEPT. GEN DATA PROCESSI 7456 < *> $1,890.00* 126811 05/04/92 $130.00 INDUSTRIAL SPRINKLER SPRINKLER INSPECTION M12724 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS < *> $130.00* 126812 05/04/92 $31.25 ISIA PRINTING 033485 ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 1359 < *> $31.25* 126813 05/04/92 $396.00 J THOMAS NELSON AC INSTRUTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $10.50 J THOMAS NELSON ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $406.50* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 10 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT - VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 126814 05/04/92 $40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE /LOGIS 0415 -042 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $40.00* 126816 05/04/92 $218.00 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 032592 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 05/04/92 $109.08 JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT 032592 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 05/04/92 $28.90 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 032592 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $176.95 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 032592 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 05/04/92 880.17 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $191.46 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $25.70 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $28.14 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $119.15 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $203.32 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $54.85 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $83.87 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $81.91 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $104.34 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $34.11 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $81.38 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $22.82 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 03,2592 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $4.45 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $11.49 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $3.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $30.18 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $24.88 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $10.00 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032592 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $1,729.14* 126817 05/04/92 $31.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 11418 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 9935 05/04/92 $31.48 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING C11215 PARK ADMIN. PRINTING < *> $62.48* 126818 05/04/92 $207.00 JEUB, PATTI AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $207.00* 126819 05/04/92 $207.63 JIM HATCH SALES SAFETY VESTS 1266 SPRING CLEANUP GENERAL SUPPL 1031 < *> $207.63* 126820 05/04/92 $10.57 JOHNSON, NAOMI BLDG MAINT 042292 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL .SUPPL 05/04/92 $55.80 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 042292 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 05/04/92 $10.02 JOHNSON, NAOMI POSTAGE 042292 ART CENTER ADM POSTAGE 05/04/92 $76.63 JOHNSON, NAOMI OFFICE SUPPLIES 042292 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLI 05/04/92 $16.95 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 042292 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPL < *> $169.97* 126821 05/04/92 $125.54 JR JOHNSON SUP REPAIR PARTS 57152 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 9671 < *> $125.54* 126822 05/04/92 $284.25 JUSTUS LUMBER CEDAR MATERIAL 35238 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 9694 < *> $284.25* 126823 05/04/92 $404.70 K.C. GROVES TREE EXP TREE REMOVED 6820_ CHE 041592 TREE 3 YR CIP < *> $404.70* 126824 05/04/92 $77.08 KAMAN INDUST TECH BEARING A715822 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1055 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, •1992, 8:49 PM page 11 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # <*> $77.08* 126825 05/04/92 $38.70 KAMENS, SALLY CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $38.70* 126826 05/04/92 $113.40 KELLY SERVICES INC PRO SERVICES 15339625 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $113.40* 126828 05/04/92 $249.19 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -016 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPL 1300 05/04/92 $76.66 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER FOR PLAYGROUND 0217 -016 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1166 05/04/92 - $14.51 KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT 460262 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 05/04/92 $331.30 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER FOR BOXES 0217-016-BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1317 05/04/92 $54.95 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER FOR BOXES 0217 -016 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1347 05/04/92 $6.12 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -016 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 1360 05/04/92 $128.30 KNOX COMM CREDIT SR CENTER SINK & KITC 0217 -016 PARKS CIP 1376 05/04/92 $37.72 KNOX COMM CREDIT IRRIGATION PARTS 0217 -017 GENERAL TURF C REPAIR PARTS 1395 05/04/92 $50.47 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -017 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 1427 05/04/92 $8.99 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS FOR SR CENTER 0217 -017 PARKS CIP 1406 05/04/92 $420.65 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES FOR SR CENTE 0217 -017 PARKS. CIP 1406 05/04/92 - $31.48 KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT 0217 -017 PARKS CIP 1406 05/04/92 $38.94 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -017 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 1448 05/04/92 $35.61 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -017 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 1484 05/04/92 $223.70 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -017 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1455 05/04/92 $48.83 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -017 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 1537 05/04/92 $6.38 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 0217 -017 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1478 05/04/92 - $11.99 KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT 0217 -017 BUILDING MAIN_T TOOLS 05/04/92 $35.66 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 0217 -017 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1478 < *> $1,695.49* 126829 05/04/92 $473.00 KNUTSON, KAREN AC INSTRUCOTR 042692 ART CENTER ADM -PROF SERVICES < *> $473.00* 126830 05/04/92 $465.50 KOKESH ATHLETIC COST OF GOODS SOLD 62226 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOO 1073 < *> $465.50* 126831 05/04/92 $1,600.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 FINANCE PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $250.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 ART CENTER ADM PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $200.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 POOL ADMIN PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $1,050.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $900.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $200.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 GUN RANGE ADMI PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $900.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $1,500.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 LIQUOR 50TH ST PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $1,500.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 LIQUOR YORK GE PRO SVC AUDIT 05/04/92 $1,500.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK AUDIT 41100 -11 VERNON LIQUOR PRO SVC AUDIT < *> $9,600.00* 126832 05/04/92 $1,822.75 KUNDE CO INC OAK WILT CONTROL 040392 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> - $1,822.75* 126833 05/04/92 $242.88 LAKELAND ENGINEERING REPAIR PARTS L -81099 YORK OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS 9984 < *> $242.88* 126834 05/04/92 $42.00 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 33 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 1273 < *; $42.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 12 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126836 05/04/92 $362.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1716388 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9592 05/04/92 $63.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1724628 BUILDING & GRO REPAIR PARTS 9838 05/04/92 $256.07 LAWSON PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1725410 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 9833 05/04/92 $462.13 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1725411 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 9834 05/04/92 $431.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 1725412 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9835 05/04/92 $489.26 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1725413 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 9836 05/04/92 $61.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1725414 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9836 05/04/92 $304.66 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1727052 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 9983 05/04/92 $357.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1728480 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 9982 05/04/92 $241.06 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1728479 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 9981 05/04/92 $326.91 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 1730781 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 1039 05/04/92 $483.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1731483 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 1035 05/04/92 •5157.33 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1731486 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1037 05/04/92 $411.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1731485 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 1038 05/04/92 $227.74 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1731484 BUILDING & GRO REPAIR PARTS 1035 05/04/92 $143.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1734082 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL < *> $4,779.87* 126837 05/04/92 $690.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. REMOVE PUMP WELL #2 18095 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 9682 <•> $690.00* 126838 05/04/92 $220.00 LEGEROS, NICK AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $220.00* 126839 05/04/92 $60.13 LIEN INFECTION CON SANITATION 005542 GRILL PROF SERVICES 9035 05/04/92 $91.43 LIEN INFECTION CON RESTROOM DISINFECTION 005557 GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQU 9035 < *> $151.56* 126840 05/04/92 $14.90 LINHOFF PHOTO 208577 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET E 05/04/92 $8.00 LINHOFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 208854 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $22.90* 126841 05/04/92 $105.50 LUNDS SNOW REMOVAL 15294 50TH ST OCCUPA PROF SERVICES < *> $105.50* 126842 05/04/92 $199.50 LYNDE GREENHOUSE & N PLANT 026097 BUILDING & GRO TREES FLWR SH < *> $199.50* 126843 05/04/92 $215.00 M & S ROOFING REPAIR FLASHING 3319 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 1153 < *> $215.00* 126844 05/04/92 $232.28 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 11994 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $358.57 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 12066 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $53.46 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 12089 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $232.90 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 12128 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $214.46 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTE 12130 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 05/04/92 $358.57 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 12212 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $1,450.24* 126845 05/04/92 $100.00 M.A.W.P. CONT ED 041792 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $100.00* 126846 05/04/92 $180.00 MAAO CONT ED 042292 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOL < *> $180.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED', APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 13 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126847 05/04/92 $484.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOM 23254 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 9887 05/04/92 $484.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOM 23255 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 9888 05/04/92 $67.50 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. HOSE ASSY 23384 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1148 05/04/92 $327.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DIRT SHOE RUNNER /SPRI 23478 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1147 05/04/92 $41.68 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. COVER ASSY 23516 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1155 05/04/92 $126.34 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. ROTARY SWITCH 23554 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1022 05/04/92 $82.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. RING /BEARING 23710 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1045 05/04/92 $318.52 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. STEEL CATCH 23670 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 1329 05/04/92 $464.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOM 23805 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 9566 < *> $2,395.04* 126848 05/04/92 $714.00 MACKERMAN, DANNY AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $714.00* . 126849 05/04/92 $54.00 MADDEN, JOHN CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $54.00* 126850 05/04/92 $2,144.00 MALQUIST, CARL REIMBURSEMENT 042892 GENERAL(BILLIN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $2,144.00* 1 126851 05/04/92 $35.00 MANNICK, JEAN ART WORK SOLD 042692 ,ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $35.00* 126852 05/04/92 $800.00 MARTIN - MCALLISTER PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICE 00004921 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $300.00 MARTIN - MCALLISTER PSYCHOLOGIAL SERVICES 00004921 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $1,100.00* 126853 05/04/92 $25.90 MAZO, EMILY ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *) $25.90* 126854 05/04/92 $26.00 MAllARA, ALICIA CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION' < *> $26.00* 126855 05/04/92 $138.15 MCGARVEY COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1188541 'GRILL CST OF GD F00 9036 < *> $138.15* 126856 05/04/92 $321.05 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 0105771 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 1056 < *> $321.05* 126857 05/04/92 $20,170.30 MED CTR HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM 922494 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $20,170.30* 126858 05/04/92 $26,975.40 MEDICA CHOICE PREMIUM 92041910 CENT "SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $26,975.40* 126859 05/04/92 $240.00 MERIT SUPPLY. COVERALLS 29667 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 1027 05/04/92 $366.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 29681 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 1025 05/04/92 $495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH & WAX 29715 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1046 05/04/92 $373.18 MERIT SUPPLY MATERIAL 29741 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 1143 05/04/92 $968.96 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 29738 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPP.L 1110 05/04/92 $232.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 29755 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 1242 05/04/92 $177.10 MERIT SUPPLY SOAP 29748 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 1174 05/04/92 $361.05 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 29770 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 1279 05/04/92 $387.60 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES .29852 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 1432 05/04/92 $717.30 MERIT ,SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 29849 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPL 1282 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 14 CHECK# DATE ' CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126859 05/04/92 $488.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 29886 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPP 1545 < *> $4,807.39* 126860 05/04/92 $50.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECTIONS 13979/13 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $50.00* 126861 05/04/92 $105.00 METRO AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING 1910 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 05/04/92 $105.00 METRO AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING 1910 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 05/04/92 $105.00 METRO AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING 1910 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $315.00* !'5852 05/04/92 $755.00 METRO BUILDING SYSTE POOL RENOVATION 108702 POOL CIP CIP $755.00* 1.`6'-63 05/04/92 $555.00 METRO SALES INC MAINT CONTRACT 322205 ADMINISTRATION SVC CONTR EQU < *> $555.00* 126864 05/04/92 $244,847.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 50500592 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC MET < *> $244,847.00* 126865 05/04/92 $92.43 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 041192 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 9037 05/04/92 $67.58 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 041892 GRILL CST OF GD F00 9037 < *> $160.01* 126866 05/04/92 $497.91 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUP BATHROOM /KITCHEN SUPP 5935 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE 1292 < *> $497.91* 126867 05/04/92 $24.00 MIDWEST VENDING WHSL CANDY 7582 GRILL CST OF GD F00 < *> $24.00* 126869 05/04/92 $642.38 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 05/04/92 $461.06 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 05/04/92 $4,438.63 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 PW BUILDING HEAT 05/04/92 $1,427.79 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 05/04/92 $168.97 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 05/04/92 $558.92 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 05/04/92 $107.38 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 05/04/92 $3,160.08 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 GOLF DOME HEAT 05/04/92 $2,367.00 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 05/04/92 $1,472.72 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 BUILDING & GRO HEAT 05/04/92 $194.55 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 05/04/92 $2,568.47 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 05/04/92 $28.01 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 05/04/92 $129.08 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 05/04/92 $219.96 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT 05/04/92 $60.26 MINNEGASCO GAS 050492 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT < *> $18,005.26* 126870 05/04/92 $1,228.67 MINNESOTA BOOKSTORE BOOKS /PAMPHLETS 72569 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PHAMP 1275 05/04/92 $9.90 MINNESOTA BOOKSTORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 72569 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 1275 < *> $1,238.57* 126871 05/04/92 $190.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL ANNUAL DUES 3556 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCR < *> $190.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8!49 PM page 15 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126872 05/04/92 $469.80 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 032892 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 05/04/92 $12.73 MN SUBURBAN NEWS REZONING HRG 5064 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 05/04/92 $16.08 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD 114A2 5098 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 05/04/92 $235.84 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD 812A3 5097 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 05/04/92 $16.08 MN SUBURBAN NEWS BD OF REVIEW NOTICE 5096 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L <*> $750.53* 126873 05/04/92 $2,428.06 MN UC FUND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANC 7976541/ CENT SVC GENER UNEMP COMP < *> $2,428.06* 126874 05/04/92 $50.64 MN. TORO INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 255310 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 1356 05/04/92 $287.33 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 255541 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1296 05/04/92 $193.41 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 256090 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1420 05/04/92 4311.12 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 256075 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1289 05/04/92 - $151.68 MN. TORO INC. CREDIT 256270 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $16.50 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 050640 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1423 < *> $707.32* 126875 05/04/92 $11.90 MN. WANNER BUTTERFLY VALVE 14077 -IN EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $9.26 MN. WANNER SPRAYER PARTS 080758 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS < *> $21.16* 126876 05/04/92 $660.00 MODE LITE WINDOW SHA SHADES 8460 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 1223 < *> $660.00* 126877 05/04/92 $26.18 MOORE MEDICAL CORP AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 6691632 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 1182 < *> $26.18* 126878 05/04/92 $127.50 MOTOROLA INC EQUIPMENT MAINT W2147481 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 1487 < *> $127.50* 126879 05/04/92 $135.00 MOTT, LUCY CLEANING 30649 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 7217 < *> $135.00* 126880 05/04/92 $4,382.77 MPLS FINANCE DEPARTM WATER PURCHASED 2/28/92- DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHAS < *> $4,382.77* 126881 05/04/92 $455.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SEWER LINE REPAIR 030971 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1515 05/04/92 $665.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CUT SERVICE LINE 030972 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1473 05/04/92 $560.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER REPLACE SERVICE LINE 030973 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1474 < *> $1,680.00* 126882 05/04/92 $251.00 MUNICILITE CO STROBE LIGHT 3666 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1047 < *> $251.00* 126883 05/04/92 $55.00 MUZAK MUSIC SERVICE 1F9205 1 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQU 05/04/92 $47-.80 MUZAK ADVERTISING 109205 M VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 05/04/92 $47.80 MUZAK ADVERTISING 109205 M 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER < *> $150.60* 126884 05/04/92 $3,900.00 NAKED ZOO ENTERP SERVICE 6290 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER 1299 < *> $3,900.00* 126885 05/04/92 $490.00 NAME BRAND SPORTS ORANGE SAFETY T -SHIRT 9667 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 9667 05/04/92 $402.75 NAME BRAND SPORTS UNIFORMS 6844 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 1228 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 16 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $892.75* 126886 05/04/92 $233.63 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 478983 YORK OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE < *> $233.63* 126887 05/04/92 $430.00 NELSON, AGNES AMBULANCE REFUND 041592 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $430.00* 126888 05/04/92 $71.40 NELSON, SUZANNE ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $71.40* 126889 05/04/92 $198.00 NICKLOW, LIA PT MAINT ART CENTER 042692 ART CENTER ADM SALARIES TEMP < *> $198.00* 126890 05/04/92 $158.90 NIEMCZYK'S PLANTS CO PLANTS 12019 BUILDING & GRO-TREES FLWR SH < *> $158.90* 126891 05/04/92 $55.00 NOACK, RUTH REFUND TENNIS 042492 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION < *> $55.00* 126892 05/04/92 $30.00 NORTH SUBURBAN COMMU CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 05/03/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 126893 05/04/92 $1,583.94 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 033192 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES < *> $1,583.94* 126894 05/04/92 $181.82 NSP CONTRACTED REPAIRS C21597 ST LIGHTING RE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $181.82* 126895 05/04/92 $418.95 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 194892 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GO FOO 1077 < *> $418.95* 126896 05/04/92 $525.00 O.M. SCOTT & SONS CO FERTILIZER 0936700 MAINT OF COURS FERTILIZER 9868 < *> $525.00* 126897 05/04/92 $192.00 ODLAND, DOROTHY AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $192.00* 126898 05/04/92 $110.28 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE ALLOY LATCH 121762 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1023 < *> $110.28* 126899 05/04/92 $50.00 ONISCH UK, JACKIE DELIVERY ABOUT TOWN 042492 COMMUNICATIONS MILEAGE 05/04/92 $63.52 ONISCHUK, JACKIE MILEAGE 042892 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE < *> $113.52* 126900 05/04/92 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 06300 GRILL CST OF GD F00 9041 05/04/92 $7.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 06327 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 9041 < *> $81.00* 126901 05/04/92 $30.00 OWINGS, LORRAINE VISUAL ARTS 5/10/92 51092 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 126902 05/04/92 $650.00 PARASOLE RESTAURANT REFUND SAC CHARGE 91005894 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERM < *> $650.00* i COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM 042492 MEETING /ADM 042492 PARKING PLANNING page 17 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM 042492 OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126903 05/04/92 $100.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES /ADAP PARK NIC MED CTR RETURN TO WORK PHYSIC 041892 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHYS EXAMS 042492 05/04/92 $63.00 PARKING & CONF /PARK & PARK NIC MED CTR' HEPATITIS B VACCINE 041892 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 042492 05/04/92 $424.15 MILEAGE /FINANCE PARK NIC MED CTR PRE = EMPLOYMENT PHYSIC 041892 FIRE DEPT. GEN ADVERT PERSON < *> $587.15* 126904 05/04/92 $7.90 PATIO TOWN - BURNSVILL CAP 1250 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 1250 < *> $7.90* 126905 05/04/92 $162.48 PAULFRANZ, THEODORE CONT ED 042292 FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPEN < *> $162.48* 126906 05/04/92 $100.00 PECHEK, TERRI DEPOSIT REFUND 042292 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PRO < *> $100.00* 126907 05/04/92 $28.00 PEDDIE, DON ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $28.00* 126908 05/04/92 $17.95 PERFORMANCE DIMENSIO GENERAL SUPPLIES 041792 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL < *> $17.95* 126909 05/04/92 $142.10 PERFORMANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 097192-0 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 1414 < *> $142.10* 126910 05/04/92 $90.12 PETERSON, BARBARA MILEAGE 041992 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE 05/04/92 $43.49 PETERSON, BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 042892 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLI 05/04/92 $152.45 PETERSON, BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 042892 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $84.22 PETERSON, BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 042892 CENTENNIAL LAK OFFICE SUPPLI 05/04/92 $15.51 PETERSON, BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 042892 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $7.00 PETERSON, BARBARA SOIL TESTING 042892 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER < *> $392.79* 126913 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 05/04/92 $3.60 $28.44 $20.00 $13.38 $0.87 $2.25 $10.93 $23.50 $15.75 $25.39 $10.95 $27.67 $38.81 $8.00 $3.15 $5.00 $3.70 $4.00 $3.98 $23.41 $11.27 $5.00 $3.00 $10.93 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH MEETING EXP /ADM 042492 PARKING /ADM 042492 MEETING /ADM 042492 PARKING PLANNING 042492 POSTAGE /ADM 042492 SUPPLIES /PLANNING 042492 PARKING /FINANCE 042492 MEETING /ASSESSING 042492 PARKING /ASSESSING 042492 SUPPLIES /ASSESSING 042492 GENERAL SUPPLIES /ADAP 042492 SUPPLIES /PARK & REC 042492 SUPPLIES /BLDG 042492 MEETING EXP 042492 MEETING EXP /ADM 042492 PARKING & CONF /PARK & 042492 PARKING/ PARK & REC 042492 WORKSHOP /ADAPTIVE REC 042492 SUPPLIES /ADAPTIVE REC 042492 FILM DEVELOP /ADAPTIVE 042492 MILEAGE /FINANCE 042492 NOTARY /ENGINEERING 042492 PLAT PARKING ENGINEER 042492 MILEAGE /PARKING ENGIN 042492 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE ADMINISTRATION GENERAL.SUPPL PLANNING MILEAGE ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE PLANNING GENERAL SUPPL FINANCE MILEAGE ASSESSING MEETING EXPEN ASSESSING MILEAGE ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPL PARK ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLI BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPL HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRG CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSON PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOL PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCR PARK ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLI SPECIAL ACTIVI PHOTO SUPPLIE GENERAL(BILLIN MILEAGE PWKS ADMIN GEN DUES & SUBSCR ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL PWKS ADMIN GEN MILEAGE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 18 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126913 05/04/92 $1.30 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 042492 PWKS ADMIN GEN MILEAGE 05/04/92 $9.65 PETTY CASH POSTAGE /FIRE DEPT 042492 FIRE DEPT. GEN POSTAGE 05/04/92 $4.00 PETTY CASH PARKING /PLANNING 042492 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE 05/04/92 $12.56 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 042492 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $7.50 PETTY CASH PARKING 042492 INSPECTIONS MILEAGE 05/04/92 $6.00 PETTY CASH CAR WASH EXP /BLDG DEP 042492 INSPECTIONS EQUIP MAINT 05/04/92 $15.00 PETTY CASH EDUCATION /BLDG 042492 INSPECTIONS EDUCATION PRG < *> $358.99* 126914 05/04/92 $81.00 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 1132 -106 POOL TRACK GRE PRINTING 1495 < *> $81.00* 126915 05/04/92 $8,816.30 PRECISION LANDSCAPE TREE TRIMMING 040192 TREE TRIMMING CIP < *> $8,816.30* 126916 05/04/92 $2,440.00 PRECISION TURF /CHEM FERTILIZER 001064 MAINT OF COURS FERTILIZER 9825 05/04/92 $383.21 PRECISION TURF /CHEM SEED 001067 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 1422 < *> $2,823.21* 126917 05/04/92 $203.44 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 555711 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN 05/04/92 $21.78 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 557960 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $225.22* 126918 05/04/92 $59.00 PUSH, PEDAL & PULL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042892 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACE < *> $59.00* 126919 05/04/92 $490.00 PUT -ONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 00032674 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 1130 < *> $490.00* 126920 05/04/92 $67.82 QUALITY WINE MIX 671980 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $67.82* 126921 05/04/92 $51.80 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 96009 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9487 < *> $51.80* 126922 05/04/92 $138.33 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 046661 ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 1551 < *> $138.33* 126923 05/04/92 $230.00 R.C. IDENTIFICATION I D CARDS 013972 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL < *> $230.00* 126924 05/04/92 $53.45 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC ELECTRIC PARTS 055914 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $1,008.30 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC LAPTOP COMPUTER 104772 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 9553 05/04/92 $7.99 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC REPAIR PARTS 056607 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1392 < *> $1,069.74* 126925 05/04/92 $50.00 RAINS, DIANE PERFORMANCE 8/20/92 82092 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 126926 05/04/92 $250.00 RED WING SHOES BOOTS /SAFETY GEAR 00088 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $114.40 RED WING SHOES SHOES 228390 & EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $296.35 RED WING SHOES SHOES 228390 & BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $320.95 RED WING SHOES SHOES 228390 & GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $85.85 RED WING SHOES SHOES 228390 & PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPM 05/04/92 $101.15 RED WING SHOES SHOES 228390 & CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL s ` COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM i page 19 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------- <*) .51,168.70* 126927 05/04/92 $17.00 REGISTER OF DEEDS /IO GENERAL SUPPLIES 041692 IPOLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL < *> $17.00* 126928 05/04/92 $101.95 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 01688 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $155.64 REM SUPPLIES GLOVES 01740 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPM 1320 05/04/92 $129.66 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 01741 .BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $2,890.16 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 01772 ;CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 1305 05/04/92 $943.00 REM SUPPLIES REFRIGERATOR 01746 ACCTS REC MIS 1541 < *> $4,220.41* IVANVALKENBURG 126929 05/04/92 885.00 RICHARDS, BRIAN PERFORMANCE 7/18/92 71892 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 126930 05/04/92 $42.07 RITEWAY WATER PUMP 103565 -M (EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1159 05/04/92 $67.50 RITEWAY REPAIRS 104161 -M EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1327 < *> $109.57* 126931 05/04/92 $6.99 RITZ CAMERA PHOTO FINISHING 3755318 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIE 1185 < *> $6..99* 126932 05/04/92 81,312.00 ROAD RESCUE STETCHER 127065 i FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACE 9547 05/04/92 845.55 ROAD RESCUE BULB 127139 EQUIPMENT'OPER REPAIR PARTS 1324 05/04/92 $258.00 ROAD RESCUE AMBULANCE SUPPLY BAGS 127231 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 9554 < *> $1,615.55* 126933 05/04/92 $2,285.00 ROB AND ASSOCIATES SR CENTER CARPET 022492 PARKS CIP 1306 < *> $2,285.00* j 126934 05/04/92 $5,692.80 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 42498 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1333 05/04/92 $1,807.60 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 42499 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1333 < *> $7,500.40* 126935 05/04/92 $30.00 ROSEVILLE BIG BAND CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 5 05/18/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> 530.00* 126936 05/04/92 $130.25 SAFETY KLEEN MACHINE SERVICE 844031 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI < *> $130.25* ' I 126937 05/04/92 $1.22 SANKEY, DIANE FOIL FOR SHOP 042792 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 05/04/92 $23.53 SANKEY, DIANE PRINTS 042792 PARK MAINTENAN PHOTO SUPPLIE 05/04/92 $55.74 SANKEY, DIANE MEETING EXP 042792 SUPERV. & OVRH PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $20.00 SANKEY, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES. 042792 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL < *> $100.49* 126938 05/04/92 $875.00 SCHEER'S LUMBERJACK DEPOSIT 042092 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $875.00* 126939 05/04/92 $75.00 SCHULTZ, CINDY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5/21/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 126940 05/04/92 $300.00 SEIFERT, ROBERT OR L AMBULANCE REFUND 041592 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $300.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 20 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126941 05/04/92 $69.74 SHIRLEY, TOM MILEAGE 041492 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE 05/04/92 $69.97 SHIRLEY, TOM GENERAL SUPPLIES 041492 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $139.71* 126942 05/04/92 $66.05 SIEMS, JEFFERY REIMBURSEMENT /T -SHIRT 042392 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW < *> $66.05* 126943 05/04/92 $638.63 SMITH, DAVE TEMP MAINT HELP 041792 GOLF DOME SALARIES.TEMP < *> $638.63* 126944 05/04/92 $54.00 SMITHSON, JOE CLASS REFUND 042292 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION < *> $54.00* 126945 05/04/92 $75.00 SOKKIA MEASURING SYS T -LEVEL 100792 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 1150 < *> $75.00* 126946 05/04/92 $2,775.50 SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 042092 SOUTH HENNEPIN PROF SERVICES c *> $2,775.50* 126941 05/04/9.'_ $25.45 SOUTHERN VACUUM VACUUM REPAIR 041 -t92 50TH ST OCCUPA SVCS CUSTODIA <*> $25.45" 126948 05/04/92 $335.00 SPECIALIZED GRAFIX METER REPLACEMENT TAG 2367 METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 1402 < *> $335.00* 126949 05/04/92 $166.53 SPS PARTS FOR SR CENTER 1871282 PARKS CIP 1463 < *> $166.53* 126950 05/04/92 $40.00 ST ANTHONY CIVIC ORC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 05/10/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $40.00* 126951 05/04/92 $26.90 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 093611 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPL 8670 < *> $26.90* 126952 05/04/92 $79.17 STANS DOOR SERVICE DOOR REPAIR 12707 YORK OCCUPANCY EQUIP MAINT < *> $79.17* 126953 05/04/92 $494.46 STAR TRIBUNE WANT ADS 1222 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSON < *> $494.46* 126954 05/04/92 $15.00 STATE TREASURER CLASS C- LICENSE/ MIKE 041492 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOL < *> $15.00* 126955 05/04/92 $84.30 STATES ELECTRIC MGF BREAKER 6622 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 9876 < *> $84.30* 126956 05/04/92 $14.95 STREICHERS HANDCUFF CASE 46470.1. POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $14.95* 126957 05/04/92 $53.37 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FUEL PUMP 164657 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $310.33 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 138379 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 05/04/92 $32.25 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET LAMP ASSM 164787 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/04/92 $136.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET METER ASSM 164765 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $532.45* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 21 CHECK# -----------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # 126958 05/04/92 $268.92 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 040192 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE < *> $268.92* 126959 05/04/92 8359.00 SUNNE, LIZ SERVICES 041792 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $359.00* 126960 05/04/92 $12,822.00 SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT REPLACE 4193 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACE 8890 < *> $12,822.00* 126961 05/04/92 $77.53 SUPERIOR FORD PUMP ASSM 147432 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1175 < *> $77.53* 126962 05/04/92 $144.00 SUSAN FRAME OFFICE ADM 042692 ART CENTER ADM SALARIES TEMP 05/04/92 $59.50 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS 05/04/92 $384.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $587.50* 126963 05/04/92 $163.12 TARGET SUPPLIES 050592 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 05/04/92 $89.97 TARGET TELEPHONE 050592 ADMINISTRATION CST OF GD FOO < *> $253.09* 126964 05/04/92 $152.50 TESSMAN SEED INC FERTILIZER 104136 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 1334 < *> $152.50* 126965 05/04/92 $155.40 THE KANE SERVICE GUARD 3975897 BUILDING & GRO PROF SERVICES < *> $155.40* 126966 05/04/92 $47.50 THE MN JAYCEES ADERTISING 020692 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 1552 < *> $47.50* 126967 05/04/92 $124.55 THE WINE COMPANY BEER 21938 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $124.55* 126968 05/04/92 $313.76 THERMAL CO REPAIRS M17963 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 1481 < *> $313.76* 126969 05/04/92 $75.00 THOMPSON, RICKI PROGRAM CL 6/13/92 61392 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 126970 05/04/92 544.96 TILE DISTRIBUTORS TILES 274395 CAPITAL FUND P CIP 2075 < *> $44.96* 126971 05/04/92 $95.20 TOLL COMPANY CYL RENTAL 430189 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL < *> $95.20* 126972 05/04/92 $120.87 TOOLS BY OLSEN TOOLS 42780 CENTENNIAL LAK TOOLS 1217 < *> $120.87* 126973 05/04/92 $45.60 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE REPAIR PARTS 93054 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1154 < *> $45.60* 126974 05/04/92 $58.00 TURF SUPPLY SUPPLIES 036987 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 9293 < *> $58.00* 126975 05/04/92 $137.80 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 2050 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 1184 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 22 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 126975 05/04/92 $110.08 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 2351 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 1184 < *> $247.88* 126976 05/04/92 $25.00 TWIN CITY JAZZ SOCIE ADVOCATE LEVEL MEMBER 042492 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCR < *> $25.00* 126977 05/04/92 $206.42 TWIN CITY SAW SERVIC CHAIN SAW REPAIR PART 3328 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 1244 < *> $206.42* 126978 05/04/92 $156.77 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 359454 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 1188 05/04/92 - $46.62 UNIFORM UNLIMITED CREDIT /UNIFORM 359468 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW < *> $110.15* 126979 05/04/92 $350.00 UNITED BUSINESS MACH EQUIPMENT REPLACE 92041424 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACE 1093 < *> $350.00* 126980 05/04/92 $75.00 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELETRIC MATERIAL 66SI 131 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 9751 05/04/92 $59.40 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP LOCKOUT JAW 66SI 1731 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 9751 05/04/92 $1,604.10 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP SR CENTER LIGHTS 67SI 173 PARKS CIP 1226 05/04/92 $228.12 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP IRRIGATION PARTS 67SI -173 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1295 05/.04/92 $60.90 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP LITES 67SI 173 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 1276 < *> $2,027.52* 126981 05/04/92 $25.00 US TENNIS MEMBERSHIP /USTA 1992 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCR < *> $25.00* 126982 05/04/92 $26.63 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE BILL 041092 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $26.63* 126983 05/04/92 $56.42 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $402.00 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $149.57 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $136.31 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 SENIOR CITZENS TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $265.28 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $51.99 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $172.34 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $1,377.61 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 BUILDING & GRO TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $213.68 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $151.98 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 05/04/92 $168.05 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 050492 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE < *> $3,145.23* 126984 05/04/92 $124.87 US WEST PAGING TELEPHONE 050192 BUILDING & GRO TELEPHONE < *> $124.87* 126985 05/04/92 $313.70 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 405871 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIE 1284 05/04/92 $841.15 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 405865 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIE 1284 05/04/92 $735.05 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 405859 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIE 1284 05/04/92 $52.40 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 406374 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIE 1284 < *> $1,942.30* 126986 05/04/92 $1,701.00 VANGUARD HEALTH PROM EMPLOYEES HEALTH FAIR 6210 -450 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $1,704.00* 126987 05/04/92 $118.50 VAUGHN DISPLAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 0046821 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 23 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # <*> $118.50* 126988 05/04/92 $48.33 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 1983 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 05/04/92 $48.33 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 1983 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 05/04/92 $48.34 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 1983 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $145.00* 126989 05/04/92 $75.00 VICE, GARY PERFORMANCE 7/11/92 71192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER 05/04/92 $75.00 VICE, GARY PERFORMANCE 7/30/92 73092 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $150.00* 126990 05/04/92 $108.90 VIKING LAB INC WATER TREATMENTS 58970 POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 1361 < *> $108.90* 126991 05/04/92 $367.60 VOSS LIGHTING BULBS 203929 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 9908 < *> $367.60* 126992 05/04/92 $22.22 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6254 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $22.22* 126993 05/04/92 $41.61 WAKNITZ, CINDY MILEAGE 042892 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE < *> $41.61* 126994 05/04/92 $700.75 WALKER PARKING CONSU PRO ENG SERVICES 66781 UTIL -HRA CIP < *> $700.75* 126995 05/04/92 $80.00 WARNING LITES /MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 0003441 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 9560 05/04/92 $172.00 WARNING LITES/MN PARTS 0003409 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9685 < *> $252.00* 126996 05/04/92 $450.00 WASSMUND, TOM SNOW PLOW CONTRACT 01009 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS < *> $450.00* 126997 05/04/92 $301.21 WATER PRODUCTS STORM SEWER PIPE 330626 GENERAL STORM PIPE 1331 < *> $301.21* 126998 05/04/92 $50.00 WAYZATA CHILDREN'S C CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 05/17/92 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 126999 05/04/92 $90.00 WEINBERGER, ADRIENNE AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 127000 05/04/92 $200.00 WENDORF, HAROLD AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/92 $40.25 WENDORF, HAROLD ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $240.25* 127001 05/04/92 $45.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 30647 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 7216 < *> $45.00* 127002 05/04/92 $65.77 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE 93639 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPL 1024 < *> $65.77* 127003 05/04/92 $50.00 WEST, DAVID PERFORMANCE 06/27/92 062792 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 29, 1992, 8:49 PM page 24 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 127004 05/04/92 $380.00 WICKER, CYD AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $380.00* 127005 05/04/92 $48.84 WIDERSTROM, ANN ART WORK SOLD 042692 ART SUPPLY GIF GOLF LESSONS < *> $48.84* 127006 05/04/92 $45.36 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 90233 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1100 < *> $45.36* 127007 05/04/92 $706.50 WRIGHT LINE REMODELING 147704 -0 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACE 8920 < *> $706.50* 127008 05/04/92 $529.95 XEROX CORP MAINTENANCE 03283297 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL < *> $529.95* 127009 05/04/92 $112.50 ZINN, BOBO AC INSTRUCTOR 042692 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $112.50* $579,460.98* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, APR 29, 1992, 9:06 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 $170,648.30 FUND # 12 $508.52 FUND # 15 $11,603.05 FUND # 23 $10,649.87 FUND # 25 $44.96 FUND # 26 $17,010.00 FUND # 27 $28,198.91 FUND # 28 $9,577.22 FUND # 29 $766.42 FUND # 30 $18,006.16 FUND # 40 $273,905.26 FUND # 41 $436.21 FUND # 50 $22,092.74 FUND # 60 $16,013.36 $579,460.98" >4� o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: KENNETH ROSLAND Date: MAY 4, 1992 Subject: POLLY BOWLES, METROPOLITA COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE, TO ATTEND 5/18/92 COUNCIL MEETING Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # Consent ❑ Information Only 0 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Polly Bowles, Metropolitan Council Representative, will be present at the May 18, 1992, Council Meeting. 1 o of `v. 0� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth E. Rolland ,City Manager Agenda Item From: Craig G. Swanson Consent ❑ Chief of Police Information Only 0 Date: 05/04/92 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: violence Petition ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion , ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance i ❑ Discussion , Recommendation: Info/ Background: Can Friday, May 1, 1992, after the high school dismissal, a number.,of Edina High School students marched from the high school to City Hall to present a petition protesting the violence occurring and the Rodney King verdict. The petition read: "We, the students of Edina, are protesting the violence in L.A., Atlanta and San Francisco. We also wish for law and order to be an integral part of our community, but not at the cost of independent, rights.. We wish an end to the violence and ask for peace. We also object to the Rodney King case." 218 signatures appeared on the petition. The students carried banners which read: "Stop the Violence" "E.H.S. - Peace" I accepted the petition on behalf of the City and indicated I would present it to the Council on May 4th. My assessment of the activity was that it was a very mature and orderly expression of the concerns of the students. They seemed dedicated to the issues cited in their petition and directed their energies in a constructive manner. 0 p► 6' - �: \1 _ T to �� % � -•' � ' fig„ J i 1 11 � ►1 � �� r ��^ � i�' � ^� ��.0 � ��'!L!'�'�? _ ��'" _�_„ D f c ALA T l,'1,' C w � s� Gv� l'.�U- '�c• •1 � L' � c%I C tC�- � u� � �- ��T - -- - - -- - p► 6' - �: \1 _ T to �� % � -•' � ' fig„ J i 1 11 � ►1 � �� r ��^ � i�' � ^� ��.0 � ��'!L!'�'�? _ ��'" _�_„ z c-\ ROX �' OT eU.'C comm,& 1 \� IL JO 5V� CA� eV `�'-o O� \ecT ` -O' vt u C4 —16,� co - - 6-7 ly ! J L. l ol Meli u -\-to - LAA0 J tSr I N U. I co. � 0 r4f O 9- aA(','( t�-O"r Q qlm \j k C) \ awc tol vio V oh Pl� AT) 44A CF6 13-7 H !-\, / ill 16uwtk 30LI-0- Haf v fS 0 Icv F-uffp---- Al rik IV, J."Plao 4 -t� � �, �n \ A, at / 4t?) C, It Y, u �y 13-7 H !-\, / ill 16uwtk 30LI-0- Haf v fS 0 Icv F-uffp---- Al rik IV, J."Plao 4 -t� � �, �n \ A, at / 4t?) u�(r,/ G \ 7 *O\ " Wow 0 r --,, D �\ p,�` i ® V,z �,,�,,, eN.� �-o v.l� \�►.cz o,,,ra. ash �c Q�e ICI his i 15 vb 6� 4 49 170 'g3- ` 19 ,l �G 7(•,r, l P$z qD �- 1� I� '�1 '1?--© l \ 1 :M"%- I.AL U.S. OFFICES: DENVER, COLORADO TEL 303 -693 -1200 MIAMI, FLORIDA TEL 305- 530 -0050 WASHINGTON, D.C. TEL 202- 962 -8700 POPHAM HAIK S C H N O B R I C H & K A U F M A N, LTD. SUITE 3300 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TEL 612- 333 -4800 FAX 612- 334 -8888 RAYMOND A. HAIK, ESQ. DIRECT DIAL (612) 334 -2609 April 28, 1992 Colonel Richard Craig District Engineer US Corps of Army Engineers 1421 US Post Office & Custom House St. Paul, MN 55101 -9808 Re: City of Edina Section 404 Permit Construction - Operations Regulatory (89- 1389 -12) Our File No. 15416 -001 Dear Colonel Craig: INTERNATIONAL OFFICES: LEIPZIG. GERMANY TEL 01137-41-4918471 STUTTGART, GERMANY TEL 01149-711-296303 - On April 6, 1992, the Edina City Council authorized legal action to compel a decision on the Edina Section 404 permit application which was submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in 1989. We will be assisting the Edina City Attorney in this case and he has advised me that the Army Corps is preparing its permit decision document. I had an opportunity to review a March, 1991, draft decision document and observed that there was a serious omission in that draft. While I am not aware of your present decision document and regardless of your decision as the District Engineer, it is essential that the takings implications be discussed. The development rights of the City must be identified since it is possible, given the other federal agencies involved in this case, that neither a denial or grant of the 404 permit would end the matter. It is essential that the record on appeal include the City development rights in the takings implication discussion. r Colonel Richard Craig April 28, 1992 Page 2 The City of Edina made application to the Army Corps for a Section 404 permit on October 13, 1989, and is still waiting for a decision. This failure to decide and resulting delay comes at a cost to the City and represents a taking of a property right of the City of Edina without payment of just compensation. Further, the development rights of the City of Edina, which were acquired at substantial cost, contemplated expansion of Edina's golf course facilities. The City's right to use it property for a golf course was the subject of a comprehensive recreational plan. The development of the Braemar Park, which includes development 'of the Braemar golf course, was recognized in zoning and land plans. The proposed use of the Braemar Park property also was recognized in the comprehensive water and related water management plan prepared by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and approved by the Minnesota Water Resources Board in 1973. Any taking implication assessment of the Army Corps must identify the development rights of the City of Edina and discuss the zoning and expenditures to comply with regional water and related land use requirements which govern City land use. Following the order of the Minnesota Water Resources Board establishing the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in September of 1959, the Board of Managers of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, working with the officials of Edina and other municipalities of the District, developed a comprehensive water and related land use management plan to govern development of lands within the Watershed. The land use plan provided for the protection of open spaces, natural areas and wetlands but also provided for functional uses of floodplain and wetlands in limited instances consistent with the land uses of adjacent areas. The plan recognized that smaller, isolated wetlands could be used for urban purposes. The comprehensive plan required the creation of large, multi - purpose floodplain, water storage,. wildlife, wetland, park and recreational areas to be acquired and set aside for the purpose of water management and to protect the natural amenities of the watershed, including the wetlands. Public purposes such as that proposed for Braemar Park were recognized public uses. The land areas for the multi - purpose sites were acquired at substantial public investment in the millions of dollars. The major site in Edina has been fully developed for wetland protection, wildlife habitat and as a natural area. The Bredesen /Mud Lake Basic Water Management Project was initiated by petition of the City of Edina and has been completed. Acquisition of land for the Braemar park and golf course area began in the 1950's. Colonel Richard Craig April 28, 1992 Page 3 The Bredesen /Mud Lake project of the Watershed District was paid for by assessment of Edina residents. Other projects include the Normandale Lake Basic Water Management Project, the Marsh Lake Basic Water Management Project, the Lower Valley Basic Water Management Project and will soon include the Smetana Lake Basic Water Management Project. These projects were imposed on Edina and were constructed and financed following petition of the municipalities. They were premised on the understanding that development of some smaller isolated wetlands and floodplains for public uses such as proposed for Braemar Golf Course would be allowed. The wetlands protected by these projects more than offset the allowed minor encroachment. Case Law and the President's Execi 15, 1988, recognizes that governmental taking. The Attorney General has issued of risk and avoidance of unanticipated case, takings have already occurred by delay in processing of the October, Executive Order states: itive Order 12630 of March action may amount to a guidelines for evaluation takings. In the present reason of the inordinate 1989, application. The "while normal governmental processes do not ordinarily affect takings, undue. delays in decision making, during which private property use is interfered with, carry a risk of being held takings. Additionally, a delay in process may increase significantly the size of compensation if a taking is later found to occur." The Executive Order and the Army Corps' own guidance documents contemplate that the duration of the permit process shall be kept to a minimum necessary. The Department of Army's memorandum of August 4, 1991, sets forth guidance for the processing of Section 404 permits. The timetable contemplated has been ignored. The delay in processing the permit has been inordinate and constitutes a temporary taking. The development right of the City is a protected right. The refusal to allow the expansion of the golf course would also represent a taking for which compensation should be paid. The costs and investments by the City of Edina in obtaining its development right were made long before the implementation of the Section 404 permit program under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps. Edina's development rights exist and under the applicable regulations and executive orders, must be recognized in any Army Colonel Richard Craig April 28, 1992 Page 4 Corps decision on Edina's Section 404 permit application. The Army Corps is required to identify the takings implication and the compensation due to the City of Edina for- any temporary or permanent takings. The Corps has not acknowledged that a restriction on the use of Edina's property cannot be disproportionate to the extent to which the use contributes to the overall problem that the restriction is imposed to address. In the present case, other natural wetland and wildlife areas were acquired and preserved and others created and preserved to meet requirements imposed on the City by a comprehensive land use and water management plan which recognized that small isolated wetland areas such as those in the present case could be used for other public purposes. The minor wetland impact in the present case has previously been mitigated by the substantial expenditure for Bredesen /Mud Lake and other basic water and related land use projects of the Watershed District for which Edina residents have been assessed.. Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 320.4, sets forth the balancing process and general regulatory policies that are to be followed by the Corps of Army Engineers. Section 320.4(j)(2) recognizes that the primary responsibility for determining zoning and land use matters rests with the state and local governments and that the District Engineer is to normally accept decisions by such governments on those matters unless there is significant issues of overriding national importance. The section also recognized that if the state interest is identifiable, the permit would generally be issued. In the present case, the State's interest in the water and related land uses authorized within the Watershed District has not only been recognized but it has been enunciated in a comprehensive management plan that has been implemented at great expense to the City of Edina. To now deny the City of Edina the development rights resulting from those expenditures and to refuse a public golf course use of a small portion of an isolated upland wetland, constitutes a taking. 40CFR, Part 230, sets forth the guidelines to be considered by the Corps in processing 404 permits. It calls for a funding of significant adverse impacts. The discussion of wetlands considered to perform functions important to the public and the guideline for evaluating permit applications as found in 22CFR Section 320.4(b) are not applicable to the,Asolated wetland that is the subject of the permit application. Colonel Richard Craig April 28, 1992 Page 5 Given the importance of the decision to the City of Edina, it is essential that the temporary and permanent takings implication assessment be fully addressed in your decision document. Two important public uses exist and the goal was to accommodate both uses. This has been achieved by Edina. truly yours' R and A. Haik RAH /clh cc: Ben Wopat City of Edina Mayor and Council Ken Rosland Jerry Gilligan Becky Comstock 241RAH /3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: David A. Veld ofi/ SUBJECT: Complaint About Feeding Birds DATE: April 22, 1992 Background Neighbors surrounding 5825 Zenith Avenue South have been complaining about the large number of birds being fed at 5825 Zenith Avenue South. One neighbor has requested that the City adopt an ordinance prohibiting feeding wild animals on the ground and limit the number of bird feeders on each lot. The City Council has suggested that the parties involved sit down and mediate the problem. Present Status I have discussed mediation with both parties. The person feeding the birds refused to agree to mediation. Instead, the person has agreed to discontinue feeding birds. I have informed the person that if excessive feeding continues and large numbers of birds and animals continue to be attracted to the site, the City will file charges against her for creating and maintaining a public nuisance. DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A607 Government Center Crossroads To Service April 21, 1992 Ms. Marcella Daehn, Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Ms. Daehn: On August 20th last year, the Hennepin County Board passed Resolution 91 -715 which approved a special levy in 1992 for paying the costs expected to be incurred in 1992 for redistricting of election districts. This resolution was passed under the authority granted by the State Legislature in the 1991 Laws of Minnesota Chapter 291, Article S, and provides for a distribution of a portion of this special County levy to municipalities within. the County having a population of 30;000 or more. The County Board expanded this distribution to include all municipalities which must' redistrict regardless of population. We have received the redistricting plan for the City of Edina and have processed payment accordingly. The distribution is 25 cents times the city population, 1990 census. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $11,517.50 which reflects this formula. Let me take this opportunity to thank the elected officials and staff of Edina for the fine cooperation they have shown Hennepin County in helping us to successfully conclude the redistricting efforts for 1992. Sincerely, l Patrick H. O'Connor, Director Property Tax and Public Records PHO:emb Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A607 Government Center Crossroads To Service r] April 21, 1992 Ms. Marcella Daehn, Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Ms. Daehn: On August 20th last year, the Hennepin County Board passed Resolution 91 -715 which approved a special levy in 1992 for paying the costs expected to be incurred in 1992 for redistricting of election districts. This resolution was passed under the authority granted by the State Legislature in the 1991 Laws of Minnesota Chapter 291, Article 4, and provides for a distribution of a portion of this special County levy to municipalities within. the County having a population of 30,000-cr more. The County Board expanded this distribution to include all municipalities which must redistrict regardless of population. We have received the redistricting plan for the City of Edina and. have processed payment accordingly.. The distribution is 25 cents times the city. population, 1990 census. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $11,517.50 which reflects this formula. Let me take this opportunity to thank the elected officials and staff of Edina for the fine cooperation they have shown Hennepin County in helping us to successfully conclude the redistricting efforts for 1992. Sincerely, Ot Patrick H. O'Connor, Director Property Tax and Public Records PHO:emb Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer a ociation of B U L L E T I N metropolitan municipalities April 23, 1992 TO: AMM City Officials FROM: Roger Peterson, Legislative Affairs Director RE: 1992 Omnibus Tax Bill - Projected Aid Cuts LEVY LIMITS REPEALED - TRUST FUND PROTECTED 1. NO LEVY LIMITS: For the first time in over two decades there are no general levy limits for cities or counties. Not only are the restrictive Chapter 275.50 levy limits gone but so are the older per capita and general rate limits that mainly impacted smaller cities. LEVY REPORTING: Cities over 2,500 population, Towns over 5,000, and Counties must report their annual levy no later than January 30 of the effective year or face an LGA or CSSA reduction of 5 %. Items that must be reported are: debt levy, social service levy, library levy, and all other levy. 2. PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY REIMBURSED: The legislature allocated $2.5 million (2.2 for cities, .3 for counties) from the General Fund not local government trust fund to reimburse local government for costs related to the April 7 Presidential Primary. Although the total amount is small, it represents a moral vict= i' for cities since in the original tax bills, the House reimbursement reduced LGA out of the trust fund and the Senate made no reimbursement at all. 3. SALES TAX ON NON SCHOOL LOCAL GOVERNMENT: All local units of government including special districts but excluding schools will have to pay the 6.5% sales tax starting June 1, 1992 on purchases of materials and goods that are subject to sales tax paid by individuals. Purchases made by local government operated hospitals, nursing homes, and library service material are exempt. This tax raises $68 million and replaces the original -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 �i Governor's proposal to cut $66 million of LGA from the 1992 aid ,distributions. Although bad public policy, it is fairer in that all non school local units participate rather than only some cities. Since the state's year is from July thru June of 1993 the cost to cities is cut in half for 1992 and spread between general fund and special funds. With no levy limits in.1993, the future sales tax cost may be recovered through increased levy at the local units discretion. MVET: Sales tax on vehicles was not changed. Public safety vehicles remain.exempt of MVET. No new sales tax is imposed,on other public vehicles currently paying MVET. 4. 1992 LGA and HACA: Imposition.of the sales tax on local government replaced a raid on the Local Government Trust Fund distribution for cities fiscal year 1992. However, the last formal revenues forecast by the state projected a sales tax shortfall of $6.7 million from the 1992 distribution. Based on the original intent that cities would gain or lose per sales tax revenue, there is a projected $6.7 million LGA /HACA cut for the December payment. The next official forecast is in November. If sales tax continues to come in above current forecast, there might be no December cut. Of course, it could go the other way and create a larger cut. PROJECTED $6.7M SHORTFALL: Attached is a list of AMM cities estimated December aid cuts. Because of a drafting irregularity the base used is 1991 instead of 1992. The total city cut is $3.3 million of which $2.0 million is metro. This run supercedes earlier AMM runs dated 4/15. It reflects slightly higher cuts. 5. LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRUST FUND - NOW AND THE FUTURE: The LGTF integrity was basically maintained for 1992 and the next biennium understanding that some adjustment had to be made in the amount remaining for 1993/94 LGA because of the disagreement between the governor and legislature at the end of the last session. The LGTF revenue is increased by 2 cents of the 6.5 cent sales tax on local government. All of the non property tax relief programs such as interest and income maintenance are removed while several property tax relief programs such as homeowners (circuit breaker) relief and Mobile Home HACA, etc. are inserted. 'The spending is thusly adjusted so that the final LGA increase for 1993 is 3% with no forecasted increase for 1994. HACA buy downs for high valued home and C/I rate reduction as well as normal growth was protected. LGA, Equalization Aid and Disparity Reduction Aid was protected and provided some growth. Unlike the administration proposal whereby new or excess growth returned to the general fund, this bill provides that growth be -2- or allocated to increasing LGA, equalization aid, CSSA, and corrections aid. The Trust Fund Integrity was maintained, barely. The future is shaky at best, but the LGTF framework does provide a powerful disincentive for cutting. 6. FINANCIAL REPORTING STUDY,. Nearly $3.0 million over the next three years was allocated to development of a new local government financial reporting system. The legislature wants more comparable data and computer access to data on a timely basis. 7. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. No new general TIF provisions were adopted. TIF for pollution abatement was provided for two specific projects, one in St. Louis Park and one in St. Paul. 8. TROTH IN TAXATION CHANGES: The name has been changed to `Proposed and Final Tax Notice'. A number of dates change. Aid certification by the state changes from October 1 to September 1. The proposed levy must be certified to the County Auditor by September 15 instead. of September 1. Overlapping jurisdiction certification changes from September 5 to September 20. Notice date changes from November 10 to between the 10th. and the 24th. All counties now must send parcel specific notices to each property and clearly show the market value and whether the property is homestead or not. Publication notices are changed to eliminate the need to specify a continuation hearing and deletes the quarter page requirement. The advertisement will merely be a hearing notice including date, time, place, etc. Counties must hold their hearing the first Tuesday of December. Schools and.Cities are allowed to set their own date between November 29 and December 20. DISTRIBUTION NOTICE: This Bulletin has been sent to mayors, managers /administrators and legislative contacts only. Please distribute it to mayors, city council members and others as you deem appropriate. -3- * * * * ** ASSOCIATION OF METROFOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES ESTIMATED 1992 AID REDUCTIONS UNDER THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE COMPROMISE Assuming a $6.7 million cut spread against the aids of cities, counties, and special taxing districts. Est. 1992 Revenue Aid Cut as % of Cut as % of Total Aid Base Cut Total Aid Rev. Base ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANOKA 1684297 3977924 11990 0.7% 0.3% APPLE VALLEY 2538728 8508514 26162 1.0% 0.3% ARDEN HILLS 28230 1529678 4664 16.5% 0.3% 1,AYPORT . 152636 986123 2683 1.8% 0.3% I!LAINE 2552701- 6591757 18.87.5 0.7% 0.3% BLOOMINGTON 2942579 24143612 71285 2.4% 0.3% BROOKLYN CENTER 2837420 7774391 23102 0.8% 0.3% BROOKLYN PARK 3942646 11618189 35547 0.9% 0.3% nURNSVILLE 2922211 12266315 37787 1.3% 0.3% CHAMPLIN 1233866 3086190 9436 0.8% 0.3% CHANHASSEN 775674 3240900 9531 1.2% 0.3% CHASKA 514809 1472042 4634 0.9% 0.3% CIRCLE PINES 43.0827 908838 2833 0.7% 0.3% COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 2820169 5232083 15925 0.6% 0.3% COON RAPIDS 4355665 9519865 28905 0.7% 0.3% COTTAGE GROVE 2139636 5649455 16849 0.8% 0.3% CRYSTAL 2668736 5713512 17112 0.6% 0.3% DAYTON 198624 751097 2252 1.1% 0.3% nEEPHAVEN 128137 950272 2899 2.3% 0.3% PAGAN 1320473 10401369 31033 2.4% 0.3% EDEN PRAIRIE 81002 12887800 38745 47.8% 0.3% EDINA 274437 10456761 31672 11.5% 0.3% FALCON HEIGHTS 321099 810184 2471 0.8% 0.3% FRIDLEY 2442641 6230425 19762 0.8% 0.3% GOLDEN VALLEY 1553607 7224974 22218 1.4% 0.3% HASTINGS 2036816 4725575 14497 0.7% 0.3% HOPKINS 1594556 5421779 16757 1.1% 0.3% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 1193261 5073803 14985 1.3% 0.3% LAUDERDALE 102916 443638 1353 1.3% 0.3% MAHTOMEDI 364389 1273663 3696 1.0% 0.3% MAPLE GROVE 1941496 8288562 24201 1.2% 0. 3 %: MAPLEWOOD 2041467 7820273 24104 1.2% 0.3V -`z"" MENDOTA HEIGHTS 303073 2509328 7220 2.4% 0.3% MINNEAPOLIS 85872388 182774398 566904 0.7% 0.3% MINNETONKA 1518688 _A.'tn94988 40169 2.6% 0.3% :HOUND 711Rg0 71477 6029 0.8% 0.3% MOUNDS. VIEW '1158409 6278 0.7% 0.3% NEW ' 3776640 11234 0.8% 0.3% NEW .HOPr: -' t .. 1778929 5255716 15371 0.9% 0.3% 894929 1831275 5512 0.6 % 0. 3% 'OAKDTALE 1401699 3782461 10741 0.8% 0.3% _:__ -ORONO 94423 1961381 5227 5.5% 0.3% 177271 502497 1510 0.9% 0.3% .OSSEO PLYMOUTH 1413712 10240735 30413 2.2% 0.3% PRIOR LAKE 765679 2830859 8343 1.1% 0.3% RICHFIELD 4771615 9864139 30077 0.6% 0.3% ROBBINSDALE 2302600 3950992 12051 0.% 0.3% ROSEMOUNT 818614 3035972 8856 1. % 0.3% ROSEVILLE 1604197 6939544 21015 1.3% 0.3% SAINT ANTHONY 425944 1726000 5397 1.3% 0.3% SAINT FRANCIS 107958 507136 1547 1.4% 0.3% SAINT LOUIS PARK 4450676 12574684 40180 0.9% 0.3 %. SAINT PAUL 56673970 122415018 379777 0.7% 0.3% SAINT PAUL PARK 611583 1097478 3397 0.6% 0.3% SAVAGE 485420 2331452 6756 1.4% 0.3% SHAKOPEE 516254 2757938 8244 1.6% 0.3% SHOREVIEW 846141 4272892 13042 1.5% 0.3% SHOREWOOD 267008 1864577 5664 2.1% 0.3% SOUTH ST PAUL 3356807 6327919 19511 0.6% 0.3% SPRING PARK 86214 531521 1522 1.8% 0.3% STILLWATER 1607648 4227782 13250 0.8% 0.3% WAYZATA 154012 1597700 4868 3.2% 0.3% WEST ST PAUL 1947531 4945873 15214 0.8% 0.3% WHITE BEAR LAKE 1505608 3901593 12066 0.8% 0.3% WOODBURY 1076501 4891432 14953 1.4% 0.3% WOODLAND 12422 143349 414 3.3% 0.3% Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 4/20/92 -- Van Wychen -