HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-08_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
7:00 P.N.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk .( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such
items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the
item will be removed from the.Consent.Agenda and considered in its normal. sequence on
the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of BRA fleeting of August 17, 1992
II. AMENDMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR DEED - Centennial Lakes
* III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. PROCLAMATION - Constitution Week
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of August 17, 1992
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote .
of all members of Council required to. pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit:.. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Conditional Use Permit - Parking Lot Expansion - Crossview Lutheran Church,
6634 McCauley Trail (Contd from 8/17/92)
B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Mark Dahlquist Addition - Lot 11, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 325 (Contd from 8/17/92)
* C. Lot Division - Lots 17, 18, 19 and Part of Lot 20, Block 10, Pormandale 2nd
Addition
* D. Set Hearing Date - (09/21/92)
1. Preliminary Rezoning - Planned. Residence District PRD -2 to R -2, Double
Dwelling Unit District and Preliminary Plat Approval - Vernon Hill
Addition — David Carlson Company, Inc.
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Agenda
Edina City Council
September 8, 1992
Page 2
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Browndale Bridge Feasibility Review
B. Appointments to The Edina Foundation Board
C. Appointment to Community Education Services Committee
* D. Set Hearing Date - Wine and Beer License Fees (10/19/92)
E. Recycling - 1993 Contract
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Metropolitan Council Regional Breakfast Meetings
IX. FINANCE
A. 1993 Proposed Budget Levy
B. Public Hearing - Proposed Issuance of Refunding Bonds
C. Set Date - Truth in Taxation Hearing and Reconvened Hearing
* D. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 09/03/92: Total $965,810.12 and
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 08/14/92: Total $508,347.11
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues Sept 15 STATE PRIMARY ELECTION Polls Open 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM
Tues Sept 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Mon Oct 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Mon Oct 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
MINUTES
OF-THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUST 17, 1992
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly,.Paulus,. Rice, Smith,
and Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Belly and was
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the ERA Consent Agenda items as
presented..
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by
Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve HRA
Minutes of August 3, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
REBATE OF EXCESS TAB INCREMENTS TO EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVED Executive
Director Hughes explained that a letter had been received from James Hamann,
Assistant Superintendent for Business Services of the Edina Public Schools,
requesting the "windfall" revenue that is generated from the City's Tax
Increment Finance (TIF) districts because of the 1988 excess levy referendum.
The rebate for 1992 would be $20,000.00. The proposed rebate.would be
collected from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District only.
Executive Director Hughes said a similar rebate to the School District had
been granted in 1991. On that occasion, the HRA required that the rebated
amounts be used for projects that were a benefit to both the schools and the
City. In 1991, the School District used the funds to recondition tennis
courts at the Community Center. This year,.the School District is proposing
that the rebate be applied to the cost of rehabilitation of the track at
Kuhlman Field. They pointed out that this track receives substantial use by
residents of the City.
The requested rebate is'for 1992 only. Future rebates would be considered on
a year -by -year basis.
Commissioner Paulus introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina,
Minnesota, does hereby approve payment of rebate of excess tax increments in
the amount of $20,000.00 from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District
for the year 1992 to Independent School District No. 273. Motion for adoption
of the resolution was seconded by.Commissioner Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made.by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by
Commissioner Smith to approve payment of the BRA claims as shown in detail on
the Check Register dated August 17, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling
$14,648.06.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
o ei , er
E�, y
ti 0
� �
• L/.lki
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
Subject:
AMENDMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR
DEED - CENTENNIAL LAKES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # HRA II,
Consent [—I
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends 0
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action FT
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Amend Redevelopment Agreement and Contract for Deed in accordance
with the terms outlined in this memo.
Info /Background
Overview of Project
The Redevelopment Agreement and the Contract for Deed for the
Centennial Lakes development closed in October of 1988. The
Redevelopment Agreement was executed by the HRA and South Edina
Development Corporation (SED). A Contract for Deed was executed
by the HRA and the estate of Fred W. Hedberg (Hedberg). The
Redevelopment Agreement dealt primarily with Phase 1 of the
Centennial Lakes project. Phase 1 included a multi- screen movie
theater, a medical building, a retail plaza, an assisted
condominium development, and a 250,000 square foot multi - tenant
office building. At this time, all Phase 1 private improvements
.have been completed (or are nearly complete) with the exception
of the 250,000 square foot office building. All Phase 1 public
improvements, namely the acquisition and initial development of
Central Park and North Park and abutting roadways, have been
likewise completed.
._ J;l.
HRA /Amend Redevelopment Agreement and Contract for Deed
September 8, 1992
Page two
The Redevelopment Agreement with SED required the payment of City
dedication fees of $3 million in connection with Phase 1 of the
project. $1.6 million of the $3 million has been paid. The
remaining $1.4 million is due in one month. These payments were
guaranteed by Northland Land Company, an affiliate of SED. The
Redevelopment Agreement also provided for a payment of $1 million
in 1995, and an additional payment of $1 million in 1998. The
1995 and 1998 payments were not guaranteed to the same extent as
the initial $3 million payment.
SED and the HRA also executed a shortfall agreement whereby SED
guaranteed a minimum amount of taxes from the Phase 1 private
improvements. The shortfall agreement provides that if taxes are
not generated in the minimum amount, SED or its guarantor,
Northland Land Company, would make up the difference.
The Contract for Deed between the Hedbergs and the HRA required
the annual payment of principal and interest commencing in 1988.
The Redevelopment Agreement with SED required that SED make all
payments required by the Contract for Deed. A payment was made
on the contract in 1989, however, payments due in 1990 and in
1991 have not been made (the 1990 payment had been deferred by
Hedberg in consideration of the 1989 payment).
Current Situation
o As noted earlier, the final installment of the initial City
dedication is due in approximately one month. The amount of
this installment is $1.4 million plus approximately $200,000
in interest. The payment of this installment is guaranteed
by Northland Land Company. The assets of Northland Land
Company are primarily real estate holdings in Mendota
Heights and Eagan.
o SED, and therefore the HRA, are technically in default of
the Contract for Deed with Hedberg due to the non - payment of
the installment due in 1991. It is very doubtful that SED
will pay the next installment which is due in approximately
one month. No notice of default has been issued by Hedberg
and in staff's opinion, cancellation of the Contract for
Deed by Hedberg is not imminent.
o According to the approved development plan, the majority of
Phase 2 Centennial Lakes developments are office uses. The
office market continues to be depressed. The realization of
a major office statement south of 76th Street is unlikely
for the near term. Less intensive office developments are
much more likely.
HRA /Amend Redevelopment Agreement and Contract for Deed
September 8, 1992
Page four
5) The amended contract provides for the grant of a storm sewer
easement across the contract property which was
inadvertently omitted from the original contract.
Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement and Shortfall Agreement
The proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement and
Shortfall Agreement contains the following major elements:
1) The amendment recognizes that the office development may
utilize a less intensive development than originally
planned.
2) The existing redevelopment agreement gives the HRA absolute
authority over the transfer of the Phase 1 office parcel to
any other developer. The amended contract provides that the
HRA still retains authority over such transfers but must be
reasonable in exercising its authority.
3) The $1 million payments due in 1995 and 1998 have been
eliminated. Instead, City dedication fees would be required
in connection with developments on the following basis:
A. For Residential Developments: the greater of $.30 per
square foot of land area or $800 per dwelling unit.
B. For Commercial Developments: the greater of $.65 per
square foot of land area or $1.00 per square foot of
net rentable floor area.
Based upon this formula, the City would receive a minimum
dedication of approximately $500,000. If the balance of
Centennial Lakes were completed as envisioned by the Master
Plan, the City would receive approximately the $2 million
that was first envisioned. Again, such payments would be
made only in connection with development that actually
occurs.
4) The shortfall agreement has been amended to provide that any
development, except assisted condominium units, undertaken
by the developer anywhere on the Phase 2 Centennial Lakes
site, constitutes a credit against the developer's shortfall
liability. Under the present agreement, only development
which occurs on the Phase 1 office site acts as a credit.
HRA /Amend Redevelopment Agreement and Contract for Deed
September 8, 1992
Page three
o Based upon the market for high- density office development,
the payment of the additional City dedication fees due in
1995 and 1998 are not feasible in SED's judgement. (Again,
these fees were not guaranteed to the City). Therefore, in
consideration of the payment of the $1.4 million plus
interest which is due in October 1992, SED has requested
relief from the payments due in 1995 and 1998.
Proposed Amendments
Based upon the current situation, staff, SED and Hedberg have
negotiated the following amendments:
Amendment to Contract for Deed
The proposed amendment to the Contract for Deed contains the
following major elements:
1) The current interest rate on the unpaid principal balance is
nine percent. The amendment eliminates the interest
provision and in its place provides for a payment in lieu of
interest whenever a principal payment is made. The payment
in lieu of interest is based upon the increase in the
consumer price index. This change effectively reduces the
interest rate from nine percent to approximately three
percent under current conditions.
2) The amendment eliminates the requirement to purchase land
intended for residential purposes along with land intended
for office purposes. Given the current real estate
environment, such a requirement is no longer necessary.
3) Land which is subject to the Contract for Deed is currently
exempt from real estate taxes. The contract, however,
provides that if such land becomes taxable, the HRA is
liable for the payment of such taxes. The HRA, in turn, has
passed that obligation on to SED. The amended Contract for
Deed provides that the HRA is not liable for the payment of
taxes which could result from a third party decision, (e.g.,
by the Court or the County), that the property no longer
qualifies for tax exempt status.
4) SED currently owns fee title to the lot for the Phase 1
office building. The amended Contract for Deed permits the
swapping of land on a square foot per square foot basis
between the Phase 1 office lot and land subject to the
Contract for Deed.
HRA /Amend Redevelopment Agreement and Contract for Deed
September 8, 1992
Page five
Reasons for Approval of Amendments
1) Development Environment. In staff's judgement, the
prospects for the development of Phase 2 of Centennial Lakes
are significantly different than they were in October of
1988. We believe that the Contract for Deed and the
Development Agreement must more accurately reflect the
development environment that we are in today. In this
respect, we believe that the City contribution requirements
provide a method whereby the City will receive, at a
minimum, a traditional park land dedication and at a maximum
the fees that we bargained for in 1988.
2) We believe that our current developer is in the best
position to accomplish the further development of this
property.
3) We believe that the prospects of collecting on our shortfall
agreement (if required) is much greater if the obligor on
such payments remains our developer.
4) The HRA's position, with respect to the Contract for Deed
and the future acquisition of Phase 2 Centennial Lakes
properties is improved.
5) The City is assured of receiving the $1.4 million plus
interest payment which is due in October.
Based on these reasons, we recommend that the HRA approve the
amendments to the Contract for Deed and the Redevelopment
Agreement.
1
o
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS: We the People did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States
of America to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity;
WHEREAS: It is important that all citizens fully understand the provisions, principles and
meaning of the Constitution so they can support, preserve and defend it
against encroachment; and
WHEREAS: the President and the Congress of the United States have designated
September 17 as CITIZENSHIP DAY and the week of September 17 -23 as
CONSTITUTION WEEK; and
WHEREAS: the people of the City of Edina do enjoy the blessings of liberty, the
guarantees of the Bill of Rights, equal protection of the law under the
Constitution, and the freedoms derived from it;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim September 17 as
CITIZENSHIP DAY
and the week of September 17 -23 as
CONSTITUTION WEEK
and invite every citizen and institution to join in the national commemoration.
Proclaimed this 8th day of September, 1992.
Mayor
17284 Round Lake Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Mayor's Office
City of Edina Administrative Offices
4801 West 50th Street
Edina,-MN 55424
Dear Mayor,
Although the bicentennial celebration of our country
constitution is past, we still need to remind ourselves and
others of this important document. The 4,543 �%,ords written that
summer of 1787 still provide us a government able to respond to
the ever - changing needs of our nation today. To that end, Public
Law #915 was signed August 2, 1956 which states in part that the
U.S. President designate the period beginning September 17 and
ending September 23 as Constitution Week, and to issue annually a
proclamation in observation of Constitution Week.
Each year the Daughters of the American* Revolution (DAR)
undertake a Constitution Week project of having our mayors issue
proclamations. Since we have several members who are residents
of your community so it seems especially fitting to ask you to
make a proclamation of Constitution Week for Edina. Enclosed is
a sample proclamation for your convenience.
If you have the opportunity to issue a proolamation, I would
appreciate receiving a copy for our records.
Sincerely,
Sally Hively
Constitution Week Chairperson
Captain John Holmes Chapter DAR
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:55 PM
page 1
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
12293
09/08/92
$3,820.00
ALDO INC
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME
071592
CENTENNIAL
LAK
- - - - --
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$3,820..00*
12294
09/08/92
$1,444.13
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66237
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEE ARCH/
09/08/92
$816.48
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66151
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEE ARCH/
09/08/92
$922.92
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66092
50TH STREET
PRO FEE ARCH/
09/08/92
$2,063.06
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66152
50TH STREET
PRO FEE ARCH/
< *>
$5,246.59*
12295
09/08/92
$15.01
CELLULAR ONE
i
MISCELLANEOUS
082192/H
GRANDVIEW
MISC
< *>
$15.01*
12296
09/08/92
$20,000.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
MISCELLANEOUS
082492
GRANDVIEW
MISC
< *>
$20,000.00*
12297
09/08/92-
$1,047.96
HORIZON LANDSCAPING
PARKS
1011
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS 471
< *>
$1,047.96*
12298
09/08/92
$6;900:00
KREMERI& DAVIS INC
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME
46657
CENTENNIAL
LAK
RESID IMPROVE 453
< *>
$6,900.00*
12299
09/08/92
$2,500.00
MASTERIELECTRIC
CO I
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME
10200
CENTENNIAL
LAK
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$2,500.00*
12300
09/08/92
$14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SENIOR
LOAN TO OTHER FUNDS
SEPTEMBE
EDINBOROUGH
LOAN TO 0TH F
< *>
$14,166.67*
12301
09/08/92
$24.00
RADDATZ, HERBERT
PARKING PERMITS
081492
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
$24.00*
$53,720.23*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:56 PM -page 1
FUND # 01 $53,720.23
$53,720.23*
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT.CITY HALL
AUGUST 17, 1992
ROI✓CA73 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paul, :s, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded
by Member'Rice to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda items as presented.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - VIRGINIA BODIIQS Mayor Richards presented the
following resolution of appreciation which was unanimously adopted on motion of
Member Kelly, seconded by Member Smith:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS: Having served 16 years as Executive Director of the Edina Chamber of
Commerce, Virginia M. Bodine is retiring on August 31, 1992; and
WHEREAS: She has been an officer.or president of the Edina Garden Council, Edina
League of Women Voters, ECCO, Edina Citizens Safety Council and the Edina
Recycling Commission; and
WHEREAS: Virginia was the co- founder of the Recycling Center in 1970; and
WHEREAS: She was one of the original members of The Edina Foundation, serving as
Executive Secretary since 1977; and
WHEREAS: Virginia has chaired Edinamite, Edinanite at the Twins and three
Centennial events- -the House"Tour, Fashion Show and publicity for the entire
Centennial year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council acknowledges these
accomplishments and contributions of
VIRGINIA BODINE
to the entire community and does hereby extend to her.sincere appreciation,
congratulations and best wishes for the future.
ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1992.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 3. 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of August 3, 1992, as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*HEJ4RING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUED TO 9/8/92 FOR PARKING LOT EXPANSION.
CROSSVIEW LUTHERAN CHURCH Motion.was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice to continue the public hearing. on the conditional use permit for
parking lot expansion for Crossview Lutheran Church, 6634 McCauley Trail. to
September. 8, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote-- five ayes.
*HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 8. 1992 - MARK
DAHLQUIST ADDITION (LOT 11. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 325) Motion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the public hearing.for
preliminary plat approval for Mark Dahlquist Addition, Lot 11, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 325, to September 8, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION REVERSED - VARIANCE GRANTED FOR SIDEYARD SETBACK
FOR EAST 45 FEET OF LOT 19 AND WEST 45 FEET OF LOT 2. BLOCK 2. SOUTH WHITE OAKS
ADDITION (4107 WEST 48TH STREET)
Presentation by Planner
Associate Planner Aaker advised that the subject property is currently a single
story rambler located at 4107 West 48th Street (east 45 feet of Lot 19 and west
45 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, South White Oaks Addition). The applicants have
submitted a dramatic redesign of the home to.include a second story. The plan
would include a bedroom above the garage that would match the existing east
sidewall. The garage sidewall is located 7.5 feet from the side property
boundary. Living area on lots 75 feet or greater rev- tires a setback of 10 feet
plus six inches for each-one foot the building height exceeds 15 feet. The
proposed second story would require a setback of 10.5 feet. The current setback
is 7.5 feet, therefore, a three foot variance is requested. A conforming design
solution illustrated a second floor living area set back three feet with a
modified hip roof and dormer. The applicants have applied and received a
building permit for the conforming solution to allow the work to progress on the
project.. This solution is not the design preferred by the applicants.
Staff acknowledges .the integrity of the applicants' preferred design and believes
the plan is both aesthetically pleasing and complimentary to the neighborhood.
Staff cannot, however, identify unique conditions that would support the request.
At their meeting of August 6, 1992, the Zoning Board of. Appeals heard and denied
the homeowners' request for the variance. There.were.four board members present;
two voted in favor of the request and two voted to deny. The applicants have
requested to be heard by the Council on their variance request.
Christopher Elliott, applicant, stated that their proposal would: 1) maintain the
neighborhood's architectural conformity, 2) promote the attractive and efficient
use of land and building space, and 3) ensure that neighbors are not being
affected or impaired by the proposed variance.. He mentioned that the Zoning
Board of Appeals had two concerns: 1) the tunneling and massing affect, and
2) that granting of the variance would set a precedent because no real hardship
was demonstrated. He said the variance request has to'be considered in
connection with the topography for the two houses. The house to the east is
already three feet higher that the Elliott's house because the land is higher.
Mr. Elliott concluded that, when considering the distances between the two homes,
the overall appearance from the street level, the fact that all the neighbors
have given unanimous approval, their preferred design is more aesthetically
pleasing from the street and does comport with the purposes underlying the
hardship on the variance requirement.
It was noted that letters in favor of granting the variance were received from
Keith and Jean Magnuson, 4716 Townes Road; Susan Schulte, 4801 Maple Road;
J. Roland and Marjorie W. Naab, 4807 Maple Road;. Lisa Holmberg, 4811 Maple Road;
Tom Schnettler and Cheryl Appeldorn, 4101 W. 48th Street; Mary Zarling and
Michael Dunn, 4808 Townes Road; and Peter Gilligan, 4719 Townes Road. No public
comment or objection was heard.
Member Kelly made a motion to grnnt� the requested three foot sideyard setback
variance for 4107 Vest 48th Street, on the basis that the integrity of the
neighborhood will not be affected. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall: '
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR PRODUCTION SERVICES - AUTUMN ISSUE OF "ABOUT TOWN" Motion was
made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for
production services for the autumn issue of About Town magazine to J. Patrick
Moore and Company at $11,840.00.
Motion'cairied on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR PRINTING COSTS - SUM= ISSUE OF "ABOUT TOWN" Motion was made
by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for printing
costs for the summer issue of About Town magazine to J. Patrick Moore and Company
at $7,333.21.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COM I'1TEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 11. 1992. •:PPBOVED Assistant Manager
Hughes briefly reviewed the recommended action in Section A of the Traffic Safety
Committee Minutes of August 11, 1992.
Speaking to the petition request in Section B to upgrade the intersection of West
56th Street /St. Johns Avenue to a four-way. "STOP" were: Carlos Parague', 4529 W.
56th Street; Mark Kieper, 4608 W. 56th Street; Dennis Berkowitz, 4624 W. 56th
Street; and Mary Ballintine, 4620 W. 56th Street. Their main concern was for the
safety of 20 children under the age of 10 years who live in the two blocks
between Wooddale and Concord Avenues. Other comments were: that residents. in the
area did not receive notification of the Traffic Safety Committee meeting on
August 11 so they could testify, that instead of the drainage dip slowing traffic
young adults actually speed up to 'joy ride' over the dip, there are no sidewalks
for children who must walk to school, and even empty school buses have been
observed using excessive speed.
Member.Kelly made a motion to upgrade the intersection of West 56th Street and
St. Johns Avenue to .a four -way "STOP ". Motion failed for lack of second.
Member Rice then made a motion to include on the Traffic Safety Committee agenda
for September 15, 1992, the request to upgrade the intersection of hest 56th
Street and St. Johns Avenue to a four way "STOP ". Motion was seconded by Member
Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Speaking to Section C (1) - Petition from 27 local residents to discuss traffic
safety concerns on Browndale Avenue - Assistant Manager Hughes presented graphics
showing traffic counts and results of an original destination study. The
Committee recommended that this item be continued until the fall,_but to perform
the following in the interim: a) conduct speed surveys with an unmarked police
vehicle during the morning, evening and noon rush hour periods, _b) conduct same
during the period of 4 -6 PM on Sundays, c) incorporate this data with the current
study being undertaken, but specifically cite the rush hour figures, d) contact
Edina Public School District and relay concerns of children crossing Browndale
Avenue to get to the bus stop, and e) conduct a.sight line survey on Edgebrook
Drive to ascertain if the parking should be prohibited on west side of Browndale.
At the same time the Engineering Department will be conducting some follow -up
studies concerning the Browndale bridge for a potential future project and that
information will be combined with the data on Browndale Avenue for a more
comprehensive report to the Council.
Rick Collins, 4620 Browndale Avenue, said he was present at the Traffic Safety
Committee meeting and intended. to remain involved in the process as not only the
traffic volume and speed considerations are discussed but also any
reconfiguration of Bridge Street being considered by the Engineering Department.
Member Smith then made a motion to approve the following recommendations listed
in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 11, 1992;
1) To remove the "PO RIGHT TURN ON RED" restriction on Saturdays and Sundays at
Grange Road and hest 50th Street;.
2) To take no action regarding additional signing in the area at 4411 Morningside
Road; and to contact Ms. Lawrence to review safe crossing locations within the
block,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
COMMUI ITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD VACANCY NOTED Mai -;)r Richards. noted that a
vacancy exists on the Community Education Services Board for a member at large
appointee because of a recent resignation. He encouraged the Council Members to
submit names for a possible appointment.
VACANCY ON THE EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD NOTED. Mayor Richards announced that a
vacancy will exist on The Edina Foundation Board because Warren Beck is moving
out of the City. He asked the Council Members to submit names of potential
candidates.
*HEARING DATE OF 10/5192 SET FOR LEVYING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Notion was made
by Member Belly and was seconded by Member Rice setting October 5. 1992, as
hearing date for.levying of special assessments.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
SPECIAL 1993 BUDGET MEETING SET FOR 9/1/92 Mayor Richards explained that the
City is required by law to furnish to the County Auditor the amount of the City's
proposed tax levy for 1993 by no later than September 15, 1992. After a brief
discussion on potential dates for a special budget meeting, Member Paulus made a
motion setting September 1, 1992, for a special 1993 Budget meeting from 5:00 to
7:00 P.M.; with formal action on the City's proposed tax levy for 1993 to be
taken at the regular meeting of September 8, 1992, when all members would be
present. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
1993 RECYCLING CONTRACT TO BE NEGOTIATED V= WOODLABE (BFI) Manager Rosland
informed Council that, in response to several questions and comments from the
Council during the 1993 preliminary budget process, Recycling Coordinator
Chandler had prepared a report consisting of 1) comparison chart.of cities'
garbage and recycling systems, costs and results, 2) city garbage and recycling
systems, 3) recycling haulers, 4) recycling systems, 5) contract costs, and 6)
Woodlake (BFI) proposal. After analysis of the data and discussion of the
Woodlake proposal, staff would recommend that the City negotiate with Woodlake to
extend.the City's recycling contract with the following considerations:
- At a minimum, maintain current level of service and schedule.
- Consider options such as a longer contract term, adding mixed mail at a
later time or telephone book pickup, household battery pickup.
- Cost not to exceed $2.75 per household.
It was the consensus of the Council that staff be directed to negotiate on all
alternatives with Woodlake (BFI) to extend the City's recycling contract and
report back to the Council.
CORRESPONDENCE FROM RESIDENTS NOTED RELATING TO JYIAND SUBDIVISION AND
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ORDINANCE Mayor Richards noted the following recent
correspondence:
1) Letter from Sidney Rebers, 6916 Dakota Trail, regarding the Jyland subdivision
on Valley View Road and non - compliance with the terms of the developer's
agreement. Manager Rosland was asked to respond to Mr. Rebers on the City's
monitoring of the development.
2) Letter from Donald Vogtman, 6309 France Avenue South, dated August 10, 19929
regarding the Council's consideration of "grandfathering" the right to park
recreational vehicles on the driveway and a meeting with staff on the issue.
Manager Rosland was asked to inform Mr. Vogtman that any specific
recommendations he may have should be conveyed.in writing to the staff.
CITY EMPLOYEES COMMENDED FOR VOLUNTEER WORK ON ABC HOUSE Manager Rosland
informed the Council that approximately 25 City employees have volunteered their
time and services to work on refurbishing the ABC house on France Avenue. He
commended the employees for their efforts on the project.
HEiRING DATE OF 9/8/92 SET FOR ADVANCE REFUNDING OF BONDS Finance Director
Wallin informed Council that, with lower interest rates, the City could issue a
series of advance refunding bonds to refund all or a portion of the outstanding
bonds of the City and would be able to realize substantial debt service savings.
In_an advance refunding, the refunded or prior bonds are replaced with the
refunding bonds. The prior bonds are "defeased" with the proceeds of the
refunding bonds which are deposited in an escrow account and invested in federal
securities. The escrow would be structured so that all of the principal of and
interest due on the prior bonds, until maturity or the call date, is paid from
the amounts deposited in the escrow account and the investment income thereon.
Advance refundings differ from a typical refinancing since the prior bonds remain
outstanding and are not paid upon the issuance of the refunding bonds. This
technique would allow the City to lock in today's rates at a time that the prior
bonds are not prepayable.
In the advance refundings of the eligible City's bonds,. the City would redeem all
of the bonds maturing on or after their call dates. This redemption provision
was clearly stated in the form of the bonds, the notice of bond sale and the
official statement prepared by the City for distribution to potential purchasers
of the bonds. The redemption provision was taken into account by the.purchaser
in determining what to bid for the bonds.
Although not required by law, staff would propose holding.a public hearing on the
issuance of the refunding bonds and approximately $4,000,000 of new recreational
facility bonds to fund the Normandale Golf Course reconstruction project, the new
nine hole project at Braemar, and the renovation of the municipal.pool.
Combining the refundings with the recreational facility bonds would reduce
issuance costs as well as take advantage of the existing favorable rates.
After a brief discussion on whether or not to hold a public hearing, the
consensus was to continue with the hearing process.
Member Smith made a motion setting September S. 1992, as the date for a.public
hearing an advance refunding of the City's outstanding bonds and issuance of
recreational facility bonds to fund current projects at Normandale, Braemar. and
the municipal pool. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly..
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,,.Richards
Motion carried.
*CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated August 12, 1992, and consisting of 23 pages: General Fund $172,254.47;
CDBG $4,840.00; Cable $22,022.14; Working Capital Fund $11,197.96; Art Center
$4,269.96; Pool $25,189.05; Golf Coarse $26,221.57; Arena $9,250.11; Gun Range
$325.42; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $23,707.20; Utilities $40,837,68; Storm
Sever $11,010.18; Liquor $64,272.13; Construction Fund $91,089.14; IMP Bond
Redemption #t2 $48,036.26; TOTAL $554,523.27.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 8:20 P.M.
City Clerk
o
p
\ENV s •/�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
—III.
Agenda Item ,*
A.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
El
Information Only
❑
Date:
September 8, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
C -92 -2, Conditional
To Councii
Use Permit Crossview
Action
❑
Motion
Lutheran Church,
j
6634 McCauley Trail.I
Resoiution
Parking Lot Expansion
i
�
❑
I
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use
Permit.
Info /Background
The attached revised parking lot plan was presented at a
neighborhood meeting on September 1, 1992. The revised plan
eliminates the formerly proposed curb cut at the southerly end of
the cul de sac. Also attached is a revised landscaping plan.
1W
DEAN NADASDY'
Pastor
LYLE HEGGEMEIER .
Director of Church
GrowthAinistriew. .
PAUL KRENTZ
Director of Christian.
Education
■
JAN STOCKMAN
Director of Early
Childhood Center
REBECCA WALLER
Director of Music:
Ministries
■.
WANDA BERKE
Office Manager
CLAIRE:OIE
Parish Secretary
Cross View Zmtkeram Ckurck
August 26, 1992
Dear Timber Trail neighbor:
Well, here we are again — Cross View Lutheran Church, asking you
to join us for another evening of neighborly conversation
concerning our proposed parking lot expansion. Once again, we'll
have coffee and goodies to enhance our time together.
The meeting is set for Tuesday, September 1, 7:30 pm, in our Fireside
Room again. We hope you can attend.
Following our last meeting, our Building Committee went back to
the drawing board to make some adjustments to our plan.
Personally, I appreciated the honesty, listening, and concern shown
both ways during that meeting. Frankly I'd rather have us talk this
through as neighbors without having to 'fight it out at City Hall.'
We will have a proposed plan ready for you to examine and discuss
at the meeting. We hope that our first meeting established some
trust among us and that this meeting will yield a consensus among
us for the City Council Meeting planned for Tuesday, September 8.
God's blessings to you and yours for the busy days ahead!
Cordially,
r
CHURCH:
612 -941 =1094
RLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
612.941 -0009 Dean Nadasdy, Pastor
■
6%. ..aCauleyr Traa-
na, Minnesota 55439 -1078
!� e}
o �
s
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Ken Rosland
Agenda Item
UT . B• i
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
j
Information Only
j
Date:
September 8, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Continuation of
Ex]
To Council
Preliminary Plat
Approval, Mark
Action
E
Motion
I
Dahlquist Addition.
❑
Resolution
❑
i
Ordinance
❑
i
Discussion i
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission voted 8 -2 to recommend denial of the
subdivision.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, letter from the - D.N.R.,
and correspondence received since the last council meeting.
SEP 03 '92 09:45 LAMBERT & BOEDER
Lee R BUMNEM
BRUCE A. Boost
Baxmu ZJEGLEX ASHLL -f
CAxru DRLAmn
LAMBERT & BOEDER
AnORNBYS AT LAW
1000 SURRIUR BDUI-fivARD
WAYZ.TA, MMEWrA 55341
(612) 475.3435
TUUMP eR: (612) 475 -0301
MEMORANDUM
TO. Edina City Council
FROM: Lambert & Boeder, Attorneys for CDS Partnership
RE: Application for Subdivision Approval and Setback Variance
DATE: Septerilber 2, 1992
FACTS
P.2
OF COLNSM
COMWE D. Lywif
DfOMAS A. JUDD
JAMES M VOMIA
WARREN V. BIGEWW, JR.
Clark, Dalquist;. Schall (CDS) has applied for subdivision of 10.67 acres of residential
proper► located within the City of Edina. The proposed subdivision would result in five separate
building sites; one site would be about 4.5 acres and the other four sites would be approximately
1.4 acres each. Slight variances are being sought by the developer from the existing 100 foot
setback requirement around the two ponds.
In the 1940's, apparently prior to the existence of any contrary regulations, the shoreline
of one of the .ponds was. artificially altered by the previous owner who dredged a part of the
north pond, thereby enlarging its boundaries into a triangular bay of water which intruded on the
land. The previous owner then. pumped water from the North pond into the South pond.
Because of the existing location of mature trees and the topography of the area, a variance for
a 75' foot setback from the ponds is being sought except for the bay of water where a 35 foot
setback has been applied for.
Evelyn Young, a neighbor on the south pond, has a building setback of approximately 75
feet from the pond. Schaefer Road runs immediately adjacent to the east end of the south pond
with virtually no setback at all.
SEP 03 '92 09:45 LRMDERT.& DOEDER
P.3
Previous sewer stub installation by the City of Edina provided for subdivision of the
ProPCnY into six lots instead of the four lots now proposed.
- W. l -IO1
The City's decision on the Variance Application should consider.
1. THE EXISTING SHORELINE PRIOR TO ALTERATION BY A PREVIOUS
LANDOWNER.
Generally, the natural shoreline should be taken into account, instead of the existing
shoreline, especially where, as in this case, the shoreline has been altered. Also, the request for
a 35 foot variance for the artificially created bay would be unnecessary if the shoreline of the
pond had not been altered by a predecessor.
The Courts have authority to order restoration of altered waters if a determination is made
that public waters have been altered without permit. See M.S. 105.462 and In re David Koldahl,
419 N.W. 2d 532 (1988). The 1973 amendment to the Minnesota Water Management Law
defined public waters as any waters of the state which serve a beneficial public purpose. (See
4 Minn. 105.38). This broad definition could include any waters, even these ponds.
We could find no reported Appellate Court cases, however, with fact situations
substantially similar to this situation now before the Council. In Van Landschoot v. City of
Mendota Heights, 336 N.W. 2d 503 (1983), a predecessor had illegally filled in a wetland area.
The Court said this unlawful alteration could not necessarily be relied upon as having created a
unique aspect to the property which constituted a hardship in its development In that instance,
however, the prior alteration had clearly been illegal and the current owner was aware of the
circumstance at the time he bought the property. At the time the present owners bought .this
property, they relied upon the City's plans for sewer installation, which provided for subdivision
2
SEP 03 '92 09:46 LAMBERT & BOEDER P.4
into six lots. The present owners had no reason to expect the shoreline setback would present
a problem for development of the property according to its highest and best use.
In the area of altered shoreline, as well as in other zoning matters, the standard is that if
an. application for subdivision and requested variances are to be denied, the City must find a
rational basis for doing .so.
2. GRANTING OF THE VARIANCES WOULD ALLOW THE MGHEST AND
BEST USE OF THIS LAND.
Because of the existing topography and the presence of a forest of mature trees and
vegetation, the natural beauty of the land would best be preserved by allowing the requested
variances for building sites no closer than 75 feet of the pond high water line. Generally, zoning
ordinances are regarded as being aimed primarily at conserving property values and encouraging
the most. appropriate use of the land. Minnesota Real Estate Law Digest, p. 283; Kiges v. City
of St: Paul. 62 N.W. 2d 363 (1953). There is no evidence the granting of the variances would
have any adverse effect on the ponds or wild life living there.
There is no more feasible or prudent alternative to granting of these variances in
considering the best development of this property. See Application of White Bear Lake 247
N, W. 2d 903 (1976). Refusal to grant these variances will cause an undue hardship whereby the
property cannot be put to reasonable use because of circumstances unique to the property which
were not created by the landowner. M.S. 462.357.
3. ZONING ORDINANCES . AND DECISIONS MUST NOT BE ARBITRARY,
DISCRMIINATORY OR UNREASONABLE IN APPLICATION OF
RESTRICTIVE PROVISIONS.
In Amcon Corn. and O.J. Snorting Goods. v City of 348 N.W. 2d 66 (1984). If
this subdivision is not granted, it would be because more restrictive provisions are being applied
to the development of this property. than to other property very recently approved for subdivision
in'the WooddaleXrOsstown area of Edina. A similar setback of approximately 75 feet already
3
SEP 09 '92'09 :46 LAMBERT & BOEDER P.5
exists on a neighbor's. property on the south pond. There exists no rational basis to apply more
restrictive standards or conditions to this property. A regulation which does not operate
uniformly on all persons similarly situated in a district will not be upheld. Connor v. Chanhassen
_Two -, 8.1 N.W. 2d 789 (1957) and M.S. 366.10
Where any doubt exists as to the interest of the enacting body, a construction of the
ordinance must favor the owner and disfavor any implied extension of a restriction on the
property. Olson v. City of Hopkins 149 N.W. 2d 394 (1967).
4. THE LANDOWNER HAS A RIGHT TO RELY UPON PREVIOUS
INDICATIONS FROM THE CITY OF APPROVAL FOR PLANS FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.
Where property has been purchased for use in conformance with existing zoning
ordinances, the purchaser ordinarily has a right to so use it. Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, .
12S N.W. 2d 583 (1963). The prior installation of sewer stub facilities for subdivision of this
property into six lots indicates the City's prior intentions with regard to development of this
property. No changes have occurred in the general comprehensive plan for the area which would
indicate. that division of the property into at least four, lots would be, disallowed. To allow
development of less than the four lots requested would severely. depress the market value of the
property and cause substantial financial loss to the owner which would amount to a taking by the
City without reasonable compensation. Sanderson v. City of Willmar, 162 N.W. 2d 494 (1968).
SUMMARY
The Council's approval is sought for the proposed, subdivision and variances requested.
Dated: September 2, 1992 LAMBERT & BOEDER
B re
y
Conine D. Lynch (#6553f)
1000 Superior Blvd., #300
Wayzata, MN 55391
(6.12) 475 -3435
Attorney for CDS Partnership
4
a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, R. Hale, N. Faust, L.
Johnson, H. McClelland, D. Runyan, J. Palmer,
G. Workinger, C. Ingwalson, D. Byron
MEMBERS ABSENT: V. Shaw
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
. I Commissioner Runyan moved approval of the July 1, 1992,
meeting minutes. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye;
motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
5 -92 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Mark Dahlquist Addition
Lot 11, Auditors Subdivision
No. 325 CDS Partners
Mr. Larsen reported to commission members at the July 20,
1992, council meeting the city council and the mayor voted
unanimously to refer the request for preliminary plat approval for
the Mark Dahlquist Addition back to the Planning Commission based
on new facts presented. Mr:. Larsen noted the following
* Discussion regarding lot depth at the planning commission
meeting resulted in a request of the city attorney for
ordinance interpretation of the definition of lot depth.
A letter dated July 15, 1992, from the city Attorney
opined that ponds /water areas on a lot should not be
excluded in determining lot depth. If it is accepted
that lot depth includes ponding areas then no lot depth
1
variance. would be required for any of the lots in the
proposed subdivision.
* The developers have revised the plat reducing the
openspace conservation easement variance requested. Lots
2,4, and 5 would provide a 75 foot setback from the
ponding areas instead of the required 100 feet, therefore
a 25 foot variance is requested for those lots. Lot 3
would provide a 100 foot easement from the "historical"
waters edge of the north pond and a 30 foot setback from
the existing north pond water boundary.
* The Developers have provided the location of the driveway
and building foot print on.Lot 1.
The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Dahlquist, Mr. and Mrs. Schall,
Mr. Ron Clark, and their architect, Mr. Mike Gair were present to
respond to questions/ concerns from residents and commission
members.
Mr. Gair with graphics pointed out the changes in the proposal
that have developed since the last time the commission reviewed
this item. He pointed out on the revised plat lots 2,4, and 5
provide a 75 foot conservation easement from the ponding areas
instead of the original request for 50 feet. Lot 3 provides. an 100
foot easement from the "historical" waters edge. Mr. Gair also
refreshed the commission on the history of the site pointing out
the property is already supplied with city sewer for 6 building
sites. Mr. Gair focused his comments on.the issue of hardship
concerning the request for variances from the conservation
easement. Continuing, Mr. Gair read for commission members
ordinances (804, 825) definition of hardship. Mr. Gair pointed out
when considering this site the developers viewed the site as 1)
residential, and any development within this site would be
residential; 2) the request was viewed as a reasonable.use of the
land,*. 3) the plight of the petitioner requesting variances from the
conservation easement is not self imposed; and 4) the belief that
the granting of variances from the conservation easement will not
alter the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Mr. Gair
noted during his presentation that the location of the proposed
building pads correlate with the grassy areas of the site where
there are few trees. Mr. Gair explained that it is the intent of
the developers to preserve a majority of the vegetation thereby
affording each building site the ability to place and construct a
more customized home that reflects the market values of the
neighborhood. Mr. Gair concluded that it is his opinion the
approval of variances will improve the plat.
Commissioner McClelland noted the letter from the city
attorney, and his conclusion that water should be included when
calculating lot depth. She stated she does not agree with that
interpretation. Commissioner McClelland added she agrees with
2
staff's interpretation of the ordinance that water is not included
in calculations for lot depth. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland
said in her opinion the letter reflecting the DNR's position on
setbacks from the ponds on the subject site suggesting maintaining
a minimum 30 -35 feet for development is too small. She
acknowledged that the DNR only claims jurisdiction on the south
pond, not the north pond, and there is no state standard on the
ponds on the subject site, but added our subdivision ordinance
requires an 100 foot conservation easement. She pointed out-a city
can be more restrictive not less restrictive, and Edina has chosen
for whatever reason, to require a higher setback standard.
Commissioner McClelland suggested if our 100' foot conservation
easement appears unrealistic, and at this time we are in the
process of recodification it may be wise to look at this setback
number and either retain it, come up with .a different number or
defer the setback restriction to the DNR and Watershed Districts
standards. Concluding, Commissioner McClelland said regarding
hardship, Mr. Dahlquist, stated he purchased the property about 18
years ago. According to city records the 100 foot conservation
easement has been in place since 1971, so in her opinion, no
hardship exists. Mr. Dahlquist purchased the property with the
ordinance in place, and he should have been aware the 100 foot rule
existed, regardless of the plan that depicts city sewer service for
6 building sites on this property.
Mr. Schall responded to Commissioner McClelland's comments on
the position taken by the city attorney adding he agrees with the
conclusion from the city attorney that water should be included
when calculating lot depth.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if he agrees with the
conclusion from the city attorney that water should be included
when calculating lot depth. Mr. Larsen stated he concurs with Mr.
Gilligan's interpretation of our ordinance. Expanding, Mr. Larsen
stated what.our ordinance is trying to achieve is adequate spacing
between homes.
Commissioner Runyan stated he agrees with Mr. Gilligan's
conclusion. He pointed out separation between houses is what is
desired by the ordinance. Water provides that separation, and may
actually prevent overbuilding on a lot.
Mr. Dahlquist told commission members when he purchased the
property he did so for his enjoyment, and the potential for
subdivision in the future, if he so chooses. He said he believes
he should have the right to develop this site in a reasonable way,
stating without variances the reasonable use of his land would be
taken away.
Mr. Ingwalson questioned Mr. Dahlquist on the date the
"finger" of the north pond was created. Mr. Dahlquist said he
believes the finger was created around 1946 -1947. Mr. Dahlquist
K
presented to commission members an aerial photo of the property
dated in the early 1940's.
Mr. Schall addressed the commission and informed them in his
discussions with Robert Obermeyer Jr., Nine Mile Watershed
District, under the 1991 Wetlands Conservation Ordinance this
finger could be filled in.
Commissioner McClelland noted regardless of what the Watershed
District indicated the city has the authority and can regulate it's
water bodies.
Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Larsen if it is possible to dredge
that "finger" portion of the north pond. Mr. Larsen said the
subdivision process triggers the setback requirement of 100 feet
from water bodies and if a conservation easement is placed around
the pond that "finger" cannot be touched.
.Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen to explain what a
conservation easement entails. Mr. Larsen explained the city has
two types of conservation easements. The first is a natural
condition easement. Meaning no structures of any kind can be
placed within that easement and within that easement the condition
of the land must remain in it's natural state. The second type of
easement is open space. An open space easement prohibits any
building within that area but one can mow the grass, etc.
Mr. Workinger questioned if the ordinance directs us on the
type of easement we should recommend. Mr. Larsen said the type of
easement recommended is up to the commission and council after
their study of the proposal.
Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Gair how water runoff would be
handled. Mr. Gair explained that street runoff would be piped into
the pond and the rest would be sheet draining.
Commissioner Runyan referred to a letter from Mr. Glickman and
questioned Mr. Glickman if his concerns have been addressed,
especially his concern regarding the size of the lots and value of
the proposed houses.
Mr. Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road submitted to the commission
a new set of calculations on lot area, width, depth. He apologized
for the initial set of calculations explaining that he
misunderstood the ordinance and submitted calculations reflecting
the average.not the median lot sizes. Continuing, Mr. Glickman
stated that he believes the 500 foot radius encompasses too many
homes resulting in the size of the lots being skewed downward. Mr.
Glickman said he feels the lot sizes should be determined on the
lots fronting Schaefer Road, and in his opinion it is unfair to put
four lots in where at the.most there should only be two or three.
In reference to house value Mr. Glickman said he does, not want to
4
see fancy tract housing on this property. He stated he finds no
hardship to support any request for variances. Mr. Glickman stated
that he is not saying this site cannot be developed, he is saying
four lots are too many. Mr. Glickman. concluded that during his
research on the subject site he believes Mr. Dahlquist purchased
the property in 1978 well after the 100 foot conservation easement
was placed on water bodies.
Commissioner Palmer said his concern is with hardship. He
added if it is possible to construct homes on this site that meet
the setback requirements it should be developed with homes meeting
setback requirements. Concluding, Mr. Palmer added if the reason
for the requested setback variances is to provide more area to
construct larger more expensive homes that is not a hardship.
Mr. Gair reiterated that it is his belief when the topography
and vegetation were considered the depicted footprints are located
in the most suitable location where less disruption occurs. to the
terrain and vegetation.
Commissioner McClelland stated in her opinion everything is
too much.
Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Clark exactly how big the
proposed houses will be. Mr. Clark responded when the homes are
completed they will be in the 5,000 square foot range. They will
not be as large as the two new homes within the immediate
neighborhood. Mr. Clark expanded on the questions concerning house
placement adding what they desire is to create lots that will allow
the proposed homes to be constructed with variations and
architectural character which is the reason they are requesting the
variances.
Commissioner McClelland asked.Mr. Clark if someone wanted to
purchase a lot and build an 11,000 square foot home would Mr. Clark
let them. Mr. Clark said any construction would have to maintain
whatever conservation easement is granted on the lot. Construction
would also have to comply with city zoning ordinance setbacks. A
house the size of the Golub house would probably not be possible
with these constraints.
Commissioner Byron noted at the last hearing he felt the
developer understood that the planning commission did not approve
of the proposal as submitted and suggested developing the site
without variances or reducing the number of lots to accomplish
this. Continuing, Mr. Byron said it is his understanding that the
developer selected to go forward to the city council with the same
proposal, though slightly altered. Mr. Byron commented that he
believes the planning commission members will always be faced with
the question of variances on most subdivisions, but in this
instance, in his _opinion, no hardship has been identified. He
stated the inclusion of the letter from Mr. Gilligan does not alter
A
his, feelings. He said he was not confused nor did he believe the
commission was confused regarding the lot depth question. He
concluded that based on everything heard this evening the facts
have not changed overly much, and what we have viewed this evening
is similar to what was previously proposed. Nothing has changed.
Mr. Larsen clarified the reason the council wanted the
commission to re -hear the issue is because of the clarification on
the interpretation of lot depth made'by our attorney, and that the
request for conservation variances have been reduced from the
previously proposed 50 feet to 25 feet.
Commissioner Johnson told the commission he was not at the
.last council meeting but has spent some time studying this
proposal. Commissioner Johnson said he visited the site and drew
a number of sketches finding what is proposed is reasonable and
fits the site. He added he does have concern that overly large
houses could be developed, and to prevent that he would be in favor
of increasing the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 25 feet. He
explained his concern is with massing, and he wants assurances that
the property will not be "overdeveloped ".. Continuing, Commissioner
Johnson said he has concern regarding water elevation but he must
put faith in Barr Engineering who have studied this site and
believe it can be developed. Commissioner Johnson pointed out Lot
.2 could easily meet the conservation easement of 100 feet.
Development of Lots 4 and 5 requiring them to maintain an 75 foot
easement appears reasonable. Lot 3 if not given the variance from
the historical "finger" would severely restrict it's development
and this area would then be just three lots. Commissioner Johnson
concluded he believes if developed with sensitivity this project
will not negatively impact the area.
Commissioner Faust stated she. believes this proposal is
completely economic and the planning commission should not be in
the business of helping people develop their property for that
reason.
Commissioner Palmer said he has no problem with four lots in
an area of this size, but wants the houses constructed maintaining
the conservation easement, and not requiring variances.
Mr. Manthy, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard told the commission he
purchased his property to enjoy the ponds. He added he believes
the reason for the 100 foot conservation easement is to maintain
our wetlands in as natural state as possible. He stated he
believes the request for variances are based on economics. He
concluded he wants the character and symmetry of the neighborhood
kept in tact, and asked the commission to deny this subdivision
request.
Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion this whole issue
is difficult to consider because of the required variances. She
6
pointed out there is no hardship and the city should not treat
developer A differently from developer B. She pointed out the
commission and council gave the developer of the Farrell property
strict conditions to meet and one condition met was compliance with
the conservation easement from the pond.
Mr. Dahlquist addressed the commission and told them he would
verify the date he purchased this parcel of land. He reported in
the flood of 1987 the water in the south pond only came up into the
grassy area, and in all the years he has owned this property they
have had no problems handling the water. Continuing, Mr. Dahlquist
referred to the plan that indicates the sewer line and stated the
present proposal was designed to comply with the existing sewer
service hookups. He pointed out a three lot subdivision would
place building pads on top of the sewer lines. Concluding Mr.
Dahlquist said he believes the proposal as submitted is reasonable,
and this site is a site that needs development flexibility.
Commissioner Hale stated he agreed with Commissioner L.
Johnson's observations on four lots but stated he feels there is no
hardship to support the requested variances.
Commissioner Ingwalson agreed, commenting he has a problem
granting approval with variances. Commissioner Ingwalson stated
each time we grant a variance a precedent is set.
Commissioner McClelland stated in her opinion, no attempt has
been made to cooperate with the planning commission.
Chairman Johnson said as a body we have a number of options;
we can approve or deny the proposal, approve a four lot subdivision
with no variances, reduce the number of lots, etc.
Commissioner Palmer said in hearing from different members of
the commission as they shared their thoughts and concerns he feels
a majority of commission members would vote to deny this request as
presented.
Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend denial of the proposal
.as submitted. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale,
Faust, McClelland, Palmer, Byron, Workinger, Ingwalson, G. Johnson.
Nays; L. Johnson, Runyan. Motion for denial carried.
III. OTHER BUSINESS:
Commissioner McClelland explained to commission members that
before them is a copy of her comments that she presented to the
council at their last meeting. She stated the reason she presented
her comments to the council is because they are in the process of
recodification. Commissioner McClelland stated she has had some
7
concern at the commission level that our "votes" have recently been
very close. She pointed out since our adoption of ordinance 804
there have been a number of split votes from the commission.
Commissioner Palmer said in his opinion close or split votes are
not a problem.
III. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Jackie Hoogenakker
8
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1992
STAFF REPORT
5 -92 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Mark Dahlquist Addition
Lot 11, Auditors Subdivision
No. 325 CDS Partners
At their July 20, 1992, meeting the city council and the mayor
voted unanimously to refer the request for preliminary plat
approval for the Mark Dahlquist Addition back to the Planning
Commission based on new facts presented. The following highlights
new information presented to the council:
* Discussion regarding lot depth at the planning commission
meeting resulted in a request of the city attorney for
ordinance interpretation of the definition of lot depth.
A letter dated July 15, 1992, from the City Attorney
opined that ponds /water areas on a lot should not be
excluded in determining lot depth. If it is accepted
that lot depth includes ponding areas then no lot depth
variance would be required for any of the lots in the
proposed subdivision.
* The developers have revised the plat reducing the
openspace conservation easement variance requested. Lots
2,4, and 5 would provide a 75 foot setback from the
ponding areas instead of the required 100 feet, therefore
a 25 foot variance is requested for those lots. Lot 3
would provide a 100 foot easement from the "historical"
waters edge of the north pond and a 30 foot setback from
the existing north pond water boundary.
* The Developers have provided the location of the driveway
and building foot print on Lot 1.
Enclosed are the draft minutes of the July 20, 1992, city
council meeting and revised preliminary plat, letter dated July 15,
1992, from the city attorney and letter from a neighboring property
owner.
COTES
OF THE REGUTAR FETING OF MM
® EDINA CITY COUNCIL EH AT CITY EAIJ.
JULY 20, 1992
R07T•CsTt_ Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, and Mayor
Richards.
REQUEST FOR PRSLffiNARY FIAT APPROVAL FOR MARK DAHLOUIST ADDITION (LOT 11.
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0, 325) REFERRED BACK TO PINNING COMMISSION Affidavits
of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Associate Planner Kris Aaker informed 'Council that the property proposed for
subdivision is located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Schaefer Road and
west of Ridge Road. The parcel is approximately 10.5 acres in area, of which
about four acres consist of two ponding areas. Currently, there is a new single
family home under construction in the southwesterly corner of the property. The
applicant has submitted a subdivision request that would create four additional
buildable lots to be accessed by the extension and improvement of the right -of-
way for Harold Woods Lane. The fifth lot (Lot 1) is served by.a.driveway off of
Schaefer Road.
An analysis of the 500 foot neighborhood as required by the subdivision ordinance
yields 60 lots. All lots within the proposed subdivision exceed the median lot
area of the neighborhood of 33,325 square feet, both on a net and gross basis,
and meet or exceed the median neighborhood lot width of 150 feet. Lots 1 and 2
meet or exceed lot depths requirements; however, Lots 3, 4, and 5 do not meet the
lot depth requirement when pond area is excluded. Discussion regarding lot depth
at the Planning Commission meeting of May 27, 1992, resulted in a request by the
applicant for ordinance interpretation by the City Attorney. A letter. dated
July 15, 2992, from the City Attorney opined that ponds or water areas on a lot
should not be excluded in determining lot depth. If I it is accepted by the
Council that lot depth includes ponding areas, no lot depth variances would be
required.
The subdivision ordinance requires the implementation of.a 100 foot conservation
easement around all wetlands. The proponents believe that the combination of the
required 100 foot easement, right -of -way width and front street setback creates
unreasonable restraints and undue hardship. In regard to proposed house
placement, the proponents are requesting a variance to reduce the conservation
easement to 50 feet.
Information provided by the
the south pond is under DNR
telephone conversation with
revealed that the DNR would
pond and minimum 30 -35 foot
acknowledged that the local
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) indicated that
jurisdiction; however, the north pond is not. Staff
Ceil Strauss, Edina area hydrologist with the DNR,
suggest no less than a 50 foot setback from the south
setback from the north pond. However, Ms. Strauss
government authority can be more restrictive than the
state standards. Ms. Strauss also indicated that the flood elevations of the
ponds are 940.7 feet. The applicant has indicated that all basement elevations
of the proposed homes will be at an elevation of 942 feet. Regarding the north
pond, there are two shorelines illustrated on the site plan. The developer
contends that the north pond shoreline was altered sometime after 1940 as the
result of a pumping system installed by the Schaefers. The proposed subdivision
has been designed using the original shoreline of the north pond. The applicant
asks that the developer acknowledge the original north pond shoreline for setback
purposes. Staff has found no evidence in City files that would confirm or
dispute the configuration of the south shoreline of the north pond.
Upon review and consideration of the five lot subdivision request, the Planning
Commission voted 7 to 1 for denial. Comments made. by the Commissioners. indicated
that the proponents' request for variance was greater than would be acceptable to
the Commission.
Presentation by Proponent
Mark Dahlquist, 5012 Schaefer Road, said he and his wife have lived in the area
for 32 years and purchased the subject 10.5 acres 18 years ago. Because of their
personal interest in the land, he has formed a partnership for its development,
e.g. Mr. and Mrs. Dahlquist, Ron Clark Construction, Inc., and David and Patty
Schall who are building the house on the southwest corner of the property.
Shortly before the Dahlquists acquired the property, a sanitary sewer line was
constructed to serve the homes, on the east side of Ridge Road. Because the sewer
line bisects the property, it imposes constraints on the layout of lots in the
proposed. subdivision.
Mr. Dahlquist noted that some of the neighbors and Planning Commission members
were concerned because the Schall house is being constructed before subdivision
approval. This was done for several reasons: 1) There is no connection between
the Schall's lot (Lot 1) and the proposed four.. lots to the north; Lot 1 has its
own driveway off of Schaefer Road and its own utilities except for sanitary,
sewer: 2) The Schalls wished to move in prior to Christmas. 3) There was a need
for moneys to pay real estate taxes. 4) The new house met ordinance requirements
because it is on a legal buildable lot.
Mike Gair stated he was a land planner representing the development partnership.
He presented graphics illustrating the proposed subdivision and pointed out that
the proposed lots meet and-exceed ordinance requirements as to lot area, lot
width and lot depth. Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 would be served by a cul -de -sac off.
Harold Woods Lane. There is an existing sanitary sewer line running east -west
through the property and City watermain was also installed to accommodate future
home sites. The distance between the two ponds is approximately 360 feet.
Mr. Gair pointed out the historic south shoreline of the north pond, noting that
presently there is a finger of wetland that extends down into the property along
that alignment. When the proposed subdivision was considered by the Planning
Commission, the staff background report indicated that lot depth variances would
be required for Lots 3, 4 and 5. Following receipt of the opinion. of the City
Attorney, lot depth does not appear to be an issue, nor was it in the developers
thinking when the lots were laid out.
Mr. Gair stated that there still remains the request for a 50 foot variance from
the 100 foot conservation easement requirement. The purpose behind that request
is that, although the properties are large in size, the consideration of the 50
foot right -of -way and the 30 foot front street setback in tandem with the 100
foot conservation easement for both ponds leaves areas available for building
pads of depths less than what would appear appropriate to the neighborhood
character and symmetry, market, and homeowners' desires. However, since
reviewing the proposal with the Planning Commission they have taken a second look
and have an alternate to propose to the Council. The. house depth would probably
be 55 feet, with 15 feet for a deck or patio, giving a building depth of 75 feet.
Considering the required front street setback of 30 feet and a potential building
depth of 75 feet, the most southern Lots 2 and 5 would require only a 25 foot
conservation easement variance. Accordingly, the setback would be 75 feet from
the ordinary high water elevation. On the northeasterly Lot 4 the same 25 foot
variance is requested. However, in the northwest corner it becomes more
complicated for Lot 3 because of the alteration through time of the historic
shoreline. The request would be that no structure would be closer than 30 feet
from the more recent developed finger of wetland or, in effect, no closer than
100 feet from the historic shoreline.
Mr. Gair concluded by noting that the 100 year flood elevation is at 940 feet and
that they are proposing no buildings or grading that would encroach on -the 100
year floodplain. As proposed, the homes would be constructed so that the lowest
opening would be at an elevation of 942 feet to protect the properties from any
damage as a result of surface water that would collect in the ponds.
Pubic Comment
Margie Sampsell, speaking for her mother Evelyn Young at 5016 Schaefer Road,
noted that water is piped down Schaefer Road into the south pond. As a result
the water level in the pond is very high so that approximately 10 -15 feet of her
mother's yard is flooded.
Ted Pier, 5021 Ridge Road, said the neighborhood does have concerns about the
proposed subdivision: l) 100 foot setback from the conservation easement - no
hardship has been demonstrated for a variance from this requirement, 2) The
creation of the "historical" south shoreline of the north pond - an aerial photo
taken during the drought year of 1979 shows the wetland finger which has existed
for a long time. If aerial photos for the past 50 years were reviewed the
conclusion would be that there is a small number of properties that could be
developed. As proposed, the houses would. cover 1008 of the available land above
the ponds. On behalf of the neighborhood, he asked the Council to deny the
subdivision for the reason that it fails to comply with the ordinances of the
City which should be enforced.
Leonard Lindborg, 5101 Ridge Road, commented that lot sizes have not been
presented fairly as they are less when you exclude the pond areas. He reiterated
the concern of the neighbors about the variances and the actual buildable portion
of the lots.
In response to comments about the shoreline of the north pond, Mr. Dahlquist
explained that when the Schaefers owned the property they were mainly concerned
about keeping water in the south pond which was adjacent to their home. They did
install an elaborate pumping system to the north pond and dredged out the
"finger" to accommodate the system. Mr. Dahlquist said that they were justified
in measuring the conservation easement from the natural shoreline. Mr. Gair
clarified that the only variance being sought is from the 100 foot conservation
easement affecting the four northern lots, e.g. 25 foot variance for Lots 2, 4
and 5 and a 30 foot variance for Lot 3 which would place the building no closer
than 100 feet to the historic boundary floodplain. Proposed lot sizes remain the
same as were presented to the Planning Commission and the net lot area of all the
lots exceeds the neighborhood median of 33,325 square feet.
Mike Dunn, 5117 Schaefer Road, noted that he is living in the Schaefer home, and
commented that the driveway to the Schall home under construction comes very
close to the edge of the south pond.
Patrick Manthy, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, said that about a year ago he applied
for a 10 foot variance from the required front street setback which was denied by
the Planning Commission for the reason that no hardship was demonstrated. No
hardship has been identified for the proposed subdivision and following some two
and a half hours of testimony before the Planning Commission the.request was
denied by a 7 -1 vote. Unless new evidence is presented, Mr. Manthy said the same
finding should be made by the Council.
Dee Dahlquist, 5012 Schaefer Road, interjected that there has been some
misunderstanding about the requested variance. They.are asking for a
conservation easement of 75. feet from the pond instead of. 100 feet for three lots
and 100 feet from the natural boundary of the north pond. The "finger" has been
filling in gradually with silt and eventually will be filled in by nature. She.
then read a letter dated July 15, 1992, from Howard Weiner, 5224 Schaefer Road,
in support of the proposed subdivision.
David Schall offered the following comments: 1) The issue of the wetland finger
should be based on what was created by nature versus what was created by man.
2) The proposed houses would be` built above the DNR flood elevation of 940.7.
3) The proposed lots meet the neighborhood median and the houses proposed to be
built would cover less than 88 of the available land, excluding the ponds..
4) Two exceptionally large houses in the neighborhood probably do not relate to .
the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. 5) The City recently granted a
50 foot conservation easement variance for the Wooddale Lakes subdivision.
6) The DNR has said that a 35 foot setback from the north pond and a 50 foot
setback from the south pond would not harm the ecology, damage the land or risk
flood damage. 7) The hardship for the property is financial - one lot versus
five lots that are buildable.
Member Paulus interjected that her understanding was that a variance could not be
granted based on financial hardship.. Attorney Gilligan answered that was
correct.
Peggy Carlisle, 5013 Ridge Road, commented that there is a great amount of runoff
that drains into the ponds. During the 100 year rainstorm in 1987 water had to
be pumped from the ponds. Because. there have been subsequent heavy rainfalls
this should be taken into consideration.
Edward Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, told the Council that the small pond in his
backyard gets runoff from Fox Meadow Lane and has flooded his yard three times
this year. Further, he believed a variance was granted for that subdivision.
Had he attended that hearing he would have objected to granting a variance.
Every dumpster of dirt brought in to a building site represents water in someone
else's backyard which should be taken into account.
Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, Inc., addressed the hardship issue as not
being financial but rather a site planning and land development hardship. He
explained that the existing sewer line dictates the road placement. When you
calculate the 50 foot road width and the 30 foot front setback, even though . you
meet all the ordinance requirements, you simply do not have a building pad that
is appropriate for the homes that most people would want. Although large in
area, it is difficult piece of land because it is restricted on the north -south
dimensions. Decreasing the number of lots does not help the front to back
tightness because the road has to stay in the same location. Mr. Clark concluded
by noting that the Planning Commission based their decision on a different set of
circumstances, e.g. they were being asked to approve two variances which has now
been modified by eliminating the lot depth variance and reducing the conservation_
easement variance to 25 feet.
Council Comment /Action
Member Paulus asked if the 100 foot conservation easement was to protect the
homes or to also protect the waters. Planner Aaker responded that the
conservation easement is required to protect both the homes and the waters.
Member Paulus also asked if the existing sewer line could be considered a
hardship that would be sustained by the courts. Attorney Gilligan replied that
under the ordinance that would be a circumstance unique to the particular site.
Whether that would stand up in a court of law is difficult to say. Mayor
Richards asked who was assessed for the sewer line when it was put in.
Mr. Dahlquist said he believed that the property owners on Ridge Road paid for
that sewer line.
Member Rice said he did not intend to take any action on the proposed subdivision
at this meeting for the following reasons:
1) Because he takes the recommendations of the Planning Commission seriously he
would like to have them deal with the same set of facts that the Council deals
with. There has been a substantial change in the set of facts that were
presented to the Planning Commission from what has been presented to the Council.
2) The opinion of the City Attorney regarding the determination of lot depth was
contrary to what the Planning Commission apparently considered for lot depth.
Member Rice raised the following questions in regard to the proposed subdivision,
noting that he did not expect answers at. this time:
1) What do the regulatory agencies. use to determine the outline of a water
body - what is a reasonable number of years to consider?
2) Would the Schall house under construction have needed any variances, if it
were included?
3) Do the two exceptionally large homes fit character and symmetry of the
neighborhood?
4) What is the stated hardship to support a variance?
5) Can the existing sewer line be changed, and if so, what would be the cost?
Member Rice suggested that the Council refer the request for subdivision back to
the Planning Commission for their recommendation based on the new facts that have
been presented.
Member Kelly said she concurred that the Planning Commission did not have the
same set of facts in making their recommendation.
Member Bice then made a notion to refer the request for preliminary plat approval
for the Mark Dahlquist Addition (Lot 11. Anditor's Subdivision No. 325) back to
the Planning Commission for reconsideration based on the new facts presented.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards.
IraiL- vF_�c.laE:r•II WItx,E: I I I .•.uF;. <- .0 -.r;. I r:•� ;. �z�, I I
6e- WAEF6R ROAD
— -- 319.21 SOUTLI --
I"
'irir:Gr•JC: 'CiC ?r•!. iiil C: . - 4 \ \\
w
13 I
J I
I l ~ I
J Q I I
5 K soon / J I
,f s 12•0o'oo'G / I
Fj
Z/ I 291 -85 S S•19'4 .• -v o / / I
POND // o
LO
I
���• g Ts
W LO 4
\ \ !
�•_ \ 15 1 u 1I 1 F II I
POND '+, �\\ «u/ ,/a L - - -I\
�, I �` �. \ � •. LOT I
I a \ C a %16TIN6 R @61D6NG6
g I/ LOT 3 I LOT 2
soo
i t
I 51 I
1 sew �
\ +eL
- -- 945 84 N O 26 W- w - --
71
APPLILAN —ct
0
DEVELOPMENT SUHMARY
�o,... rra .eaa a••, «•: si oa Dal. .a.
Ow DO D•La,104 - 6c
DO .. aaGas•
♦o i
R. aR' - 1• c
LOT TAeULA�ON
— IDS �.R � «Ra•1) A "R•aT(«Fy
a reD 1 +o w e 1. �:•,
»e „•,eon
o. use .°.•D ..a.o - �. „s •)
4GVMLG PGRIGTU&L [/SGMGNT
1.. u. •u •. wlaaa r. vf...a.a.
4ny.. s «M
.r eR.a ael� r
w.�r�rli.l.��e�.rl�•..:.�: w�er�i u:r u:
NORTH
O 1, b 100 200 C 1
e e `• ���•� a 1••I ndame.....a Roll a..e.I.)..,Ilrc. PRELIMINARY PLAT 'O pQEPARED coR� 1 A
so:l:abA•e MARK DAWLQUIST ADDITION eDS PARTNERS
ir •a�,l .1111-10 Iiolwmmwn EDINA• MINNESOTA
UIVK"I'ICIKU KthlUN b
STATE OF
Itall
DEPARTMENT
METRO WATERS - 1200
PHONEN0772 -7910
July 29, 1992
Ms. Kris Aaker
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
J U 1 Ly 1-11 io :4( No.UUb 1-1.02
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106
FILE NO.
RE: DEVELOPMENT OFF SCHAEFFER ROAD, WETLAND 27 -782W, CITY OF EDINA
Dear Ms. Aaker:
I', have received numerous inquiries regarding setback issues for the
proposed development off Schaeffer Road. The intent of this letter is
to summarize and expand on the information I have relayed to various
interested parties.
There are two wetlands in question on this property. The "south pond"
(wetland 27 -782W) is under DNR jurisdiction. The "north pond" is not.
There is no state standard for a minimum structure setback on smaller
wetlands /ponds such as the two in question here. However, the city has
the authority to require a setback, and the DNR- Division of Waters has
strongly encouraged cities to do so in the past. The appropriate
setback is a local decision. The DNR has not established
recommendations for minimum setbacks for the basins that are not subject
to the state shoreland management regulations. However, I offer the
following points to consider in the determination of appropriate
setbacks.
The state shoreland management standards apply to lakes 10 acres or
larger in incorporated areas (25 acres or larger in unincorporated
areas). In sewered regions, the minimum state standards for structure
setbacks are: 50 feet for general development lakes, 75 feet for
recreational development lakes, and 150 feet for natural environment
lakes.. (The general development, recreational development and natural
environment classifications can be a little misleading. For example,
the public often fears we are encouraging water skiing and other active
recreational activities when they hear a lake is classified as
recreational development. I prefer to think of the different classes
either as high, medium and low density development classifications or as
"more developed," "somewhat developed,l' and "minimally developed"
classifications.)
The state does not have minimum structure setbacks for those basins that
were not. large enough to be classified in the 1970's. When asked about
suggested minimum setbacks for smaller basins, I. usually recommend that
cities consider a setback of at least 30 to 35 feet, mainly to allow
some level of flood protection and prevent filling in the wetland as a
result of grading for the structure construction. I have seen many
examples of serious problems where these minimal setbacks are not met.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Ms. Kris Aaker
July 29, 1992.
Page 2
In determining an appropriate setback, the city should also take the
preservation of the basin's ecological values into consideration. In
order to maintain the integrity of the basin's ecosystem, an undisturbed
buffer is required. A structure can meet a 35 foot setback, but if a
manicured lawn goes down to the edge of the basin there
protection of the basin's ecological and is little
water quality values.
The state shoreland management standards require that the "shore impact
7zone is maintained in a more natural, undisturbed state. p
mpact.zone is half the structure setback distance, or 25 37-1/ shore
75 feet for basins classified � 1/2, and
recreational development and natural environment gTherefore,�ethemsize
of the preferred active yard area needs to be taken into consideration.
Even if the wetland is not filled or destroyed when the structure is
constructed, the wetland /basin is often severely impacted by landowners
who feel they need a larger yard and extend the area of disturbance to
or into, the basin.
one last important consideration is consistency within the.cit
have discussed in the past, the DNR supports • As we
require structure setbacks in the new developments. ments. Hoever, (forts k to
of structure setbacks for additions or redevelopment in the lack
developed areas continues to be a concern. As P Previously `
appropriate setbacks for new developments,
the city should consideroa
commitment to a timeline for addressing setbacks in the developed areas.
I have also received questions regarding to how to measure the setback,
based on historical or existing conditions. The state standards specify
that the setback is. measured from the ordinary
elevation. We measure from the existing oHW, high Water (OHW
about whether the. setback should be measured there was a querentn
historical shoreline, I would take two dates into consideration: the
date the city adopted the original structure setbacks and the date he
DNR wetland inventory was finalized in Hennepin
While a unique . history for the shoreline would not County eM n 2eff effect t 4on.
where we would measure the setback distance from, it would certainly be
a valid consideration for a variance request.
Please contact me at 772 -7910 should you have further uest ions.
Sincerely,
q
C
Ceil Strauss
Area Hydrologist
CC: wetlanq 27 -782W file
Edward W. Glickman
5217 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN 55436
612 - 935 - 0625
July 23, 1992
The Community Development
& Planning Commission
c/o Craig Larsen
Edina City Offices
4801 50th Street West
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Dahlquist Subdivision
46 Dear Planning Commission:
I write this letter as a resident of Edina concerned about preserving the value of
my home and the quality of our wetlands who is opposed to granting a variance to
allow the Proposed Dahquist Addition. While I have had the benefit of sitting in on both
the Planning Commission, the City Council hearings and the patient, capable help of
your Planning Commission staff, you may be aware of certain information which has
not come to my attention. Therefore, if I reiterate anything which you already know it is
only out of ignorance and not arrogance.
I am opposed to granting a variance of the city's water conservation easement
requirements on the proposed Dahlquist subdivision for the following reasons.
The developers have not shown the requisite need for the variance which they
seek.
Edina has an ordinance (Section 810.05 subd.. 1) which explains the
necessary conditions under which a variance may be granted. It tells us that variances
will only be granted " upon a finding that an unusual hardship exists as to the land....,
and specifically that:
A. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience;
B. The hardship is due to the particular physical ... condition of the land:
C. The condition ... upon which the request for a variance is based are unique to
the property ... and not generally applicable to other property;
D. The hardship is caused by this Section and not the applicants;
E. The variance will result in an improved plat.. ; and
F. The - variance will not alter the essential character of the land within the plat ...
or in the neighborhood of the land." You will note that the section goes on to confirm
that each of these requirements is in the conjunctive and not the disjunctive. I believe
on the basis of the law and facts stated below that the proposal fails on each and every
subsection. However: if you find that it fails on even one subsection you must deny the
request for a variance.
Minnesota State Law (Minn. Stat. Annot. Section 394.27 Subd.. 7) which is the
enabling legislation for all municipal zoning ordinances not only concurs; but; in my
opinion, _is even more restrictive when it states " ... Variances shall only be permitted
when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control
in cases when there are practical difficulties or particular hardship,... and when the
terms of the variance are. consistent with the comprehensive plan." Subdivision 7
goes on to specifically define "hardship ". Hardship according to this law occurs when
the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the
conditions allowed; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the
property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality. Again, it is important to note that these sections are
in the conjunctive and not the disjunctive sense. Perhaps, most importantly this section
specifically states that "Economic considerations alone will not constitute a hardship if
a reasonable use for the property exists ...
Legal authorities (Law of Real Property, Zoning, Section 872.2) concur and
.affirm this high standard for granting variances. The author of this treatise states "An
essential element of the "unnecessary hardship concept requires that the hardship be
11 unneceesary ", i.e., that the preservation of the spirit and intent of the zoning
ordinance does not require the denial of the variance request. Furthermore, the
"hardship" sufficient to require the grant of a variance -must be substantial and serious.
This degree is reached when the application of the ordinance to a parcel of land
reduces its value to the level of a confiscation.
Minnesota case law (Hedlund v City of Mao %wood 366 N.W..2d 624 ( Minn.
App.. 1985)) also agrees basically restating everything mentioned above and adding
two interesting points worthy of mention. First, because a variance allows property to
be used in a manner forbidden by zoning ordinances, an applicant for a variance has
a heavy burden to show that grant is appropriate. Zuger v City olRumsyi/le. 29.5
N.W..2d 609, 612.(Minn. 1980). Also particularly important from your point of view, this
case clearly states that a municipal decision - making body has broad discretionary
power to deny an application for a variance. VanlLandschoot , 336 N.W..2d at 57. .
The appropriateness of the developers basis for requesting a variance is
challenging. This is difficult because they have been less than specific in their
statements and in my opinion, no where near fulfilling their heavy burden burden of
proof. At the City Council meeting on July 20,1992, Mr. Schall stated the variance was
needed for "financial " reasons. Later, in that same meeting, Mr. Dahlquist stated that
he had a problem with the position of the sanitary sewer on the subject property. At
the Planning Commission meeting on May 27, 1992, according to the minutes
(Recorded Minutes, pg.;7), Mr. Clark said of working within the existing conservation
easements "You could construct four houses but they would be forced on the site and
would not in his opinion be as appealing as the houses positioned on site as
proposed." We have seen from the material cited above that maximization of the
economic benefit to 'developers does not constitute hardship._ In addition, I doubt a
developer's aesthetic judgment qualifies as a hardship which is serious and
.substantial. Mr. Dahlquist alluded to a sewer problem. What he did not say was that
the sewer could be moved, houses can be put near sewers, and even some house sit
on top of sewers. Allow me to point out a bit of irony, Mr. Dahlquist is apparently
planning to use the sewer requested and paid for by the residents of Ridge Road for
the free benefit of his own development over the strong objection to this development
by the very same people who bought and paid for "his" sewer.
The developers are experienced and familiar with the risks of zoning
regulations. Mr. Clark is a sophisticated real estate developer and skilled home builder
with a history of operating within the city of Edina. Mr. Dahlquist is also _a sophisticated
and very sucessfull businessman and a 35+ year resident of the city of Edina. I have
little knowledge of Mr. Schall, however, I do know that he is a partner in the
development and an owner of the "fifth" lot ( "grandfathered" in to allow five lots ). None
of these people, can complain that they are "surprised" by the applicable ordinances.
All of them knew very well of their existence before they formed their partnership and
sought the variance to allow the development. In fact, I would submit that they planned
their actions (the Schall home) to maximize their leverage on the city. As such, they
have brought the "hardship'' upon themselves, it does not flow from the ordinance or a
peculiarity with the land and thereby fails the conditions for granting a variance. These
facts are strikingly similar to the Hedlund case.
. Allowing the proposed development will harm the essential character of the
neighborhood.
The question was raised of how the. lot size of Schaefer Road alone would
compare , to the Dahlquist Addition lot size,at meetings of the Planning Commission
on May 27,1992, by Commissioner McClelland and the City Council on July 20, 1992
by Mayor xxx . I have made these computations. They are 84,213 S.F., for Schaefer
Road compared to 39,694 S.F.. for the Dahlquist addition (with the Schall " fifth " lot
excluded). In other words, the average lot on Schaefer Road is almost 2 114 times
larger than the proposed lots in the Dahlquist addition. There are similar unfavorable
comparisons for Interlachen where the average lot is 121% larger and Ridge Road
where the average lot is 115% larger. I did not have access to city records providing
square footage of houses on Schaefer Road to compare them to the Dahquist addition
of 4,500 S.F..; but, I would venture a guess that one could come up with a similar
unfavorable comparison in the realm of over double. This data could be easily found.
Allowing the. proposed development will violate the written objectives and
policies of the City of Edina for land use.
Under. the Minnesota law (Section 394, cited above), a Comprehensive Plan is
required ( Minnesota Statutes Annot. Section 394.22). Edina has such a plan which is
incorporated by reference into the Land Use & Planning ordinances of Edina (Section
810.02). The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edina specifically states as a matter
public policy objective, "The protection and management of lakes, ponds and wet
lands for storm water retention areas, wildlife areas, and amenity areas ... " Amongst
the specific stated policies to attain this objective we find a requirement for the "...
dedication of or the grant of a scenic easement over Type 3, 4, and 5 wetlands in
conjunction with the subdivision or dedication of property." Abridging the, conservation
easement by definition violates. spirit, purpose and intent of the cities own public
policy. As such, no variance can be allowed.
I have great respect for property rights. There are several homes on the block
which I feel are impractical; but, those owners did not come to the city to ask for relief
from the rules and regulations which govern us all.. As such they are able to build
whatever they want . However, when developers ask to change the rules they give me
and my neighbors not only standing to complain but a forum within which to do it. I see
the proposal under question as an ill conceived scheme which they admit exists only
to maximize their economic benefit. They have attempted to bootstrap themselves via
the Schall home into five lots where there should be at most three. This plan shows a
callous disregard for the character of this unique neighborhood by proposing to build
too many homes with grossly inconsistent lot and building size. In addition, their
request makes a sham out of the cities written public policy to protect our important
water rights and environment.
Very truly yours, CIA
Edward W. Glickman
City of Edina
Land Use & Platting
be published as to lot divisions made pursuant to this Subd. 2 (but shall be
published for subdivision made pursuant to Subd. 1 of this Subsection), (ii) no sign
need be erected, and (iii) only a survey prepared and signed - by a Minnesota
registered land surveyor showing the proposed lot division need be filed with the
Planner together with the required fee and such additional information that, in the
opinion of the Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the lot division and
determination that it is consistent with the requirements of this Section.
810.05 Variances.
Subd. 1 Grant by Councd. In connection with the preliminary or final approval
of a plat or subdivision the Council may grant variances from the provisions of this
Section. The Council shall grant variances only upon finding that an unusual
hardship exists as to the land within the plat or subdivision, and specifically that:
A. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience;
B. The hardship is due to the particular physical surroundings, shape or
topographical condition of the land;
C. The condition or conditions upon which the request for a variance is
based are unique to the property being platted or subdivided and not
generally applicable to other property;
D. The hardship is caused by this Section and not by the applicants;
E. The variance will result in an improved plat or subdivision; and
F. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the land
within the plat or subdivision or in the neighborhood of the land.
A grant of a variance by the Council shall be deemed. to include a favorable fording
on each of the variance grounds set out above even if not specifically set out in the
approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting.
Subd. 2 Conditions, In
granting a variance the Council may impose conditions
to ensure compliance with the purposes and objectives of this Section and other
applicable provisions of this Code and to protect adjacent properties. The conditions
may be made a part of any Development Contract required by Subsection 810.12.
810.06 Denial of Permits. A building permit or other permit for the development or
improvement of any parcel, tract, or lot may be denied for any of the reasons set out below
in this Subsection:
Subd. 1 Violations of M.S. 462. If the parcel, tract or lot is conveyed in
810-4
�.
§ 394.27 PLANNING
of adjustment shall take into consideration the town board's recommendation when the
board of adjustment's decision directly affects land within the town.
Subd. 6. An appeal from any order, requirement, decision, or determination of any
in time as shall be prescribed by the ordinance
administrative official shall be taken such
creating the board of adjustment by filing with the board of adjustment a notice of appeal
specifying the grounds thereof. The board of adjustment shall fix a reasonable time for
due thereof to the appellant and the officer from
the hearing of the appeal and give notice
whom the appeal is taken and to the public and decide the same within a reasonable time
which shall be defined in the ordinance establishing the board of adjustment. An appeal
the action appealed from unless the board of
stays all proceedings in furtherance of
to whom the appeal is taken certifies that by reason of the facts stated in the
adjustment
certificate a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property. The board of adjustment
or or may modify the order, requirement, decision,
may reverse or affirm wholly partly,
or determination appealed from and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer
'
from whom the appeal was taken and may direct the issuance of a permit. The reasons
for the board's decision shall be stated in writing•
Subd. 7. The board of adjustment shall have the exclusive power to order the issuance
including restrictions placed on
of variances from. the terms of any official control
Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the
nonconformities.
purposes and intent of the official control in cases when there are practical
general
difficulties or particular hardship in the way of carrying out the strict letter of any
control, and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive
•
official
plan. "Hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the
use if used under the conditions
property in question cannot be put to a reasonable
allowed by the official controls; the plight of the landowner is due. to circumstaneps
unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted
not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone sha ,.
constitute a hardship if a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of
for sheltered construction as defined in
ordinance. Variances shall be granted earth
116J.06, subdivision 2, when in harmony with the official controls. No variance
section
may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which
may impose conditions in the
the subject property is located. The board of adjustment
insure and to protect adjacent properties and the
granting of variances to compliance
public interest. The board of adjustment may consider the inability to use solar energy)
a "hardship" in the granting of variances.
L.ystems
Subd. 8. A certified copy of any order issued by the board of adjustment acting upon
decision or determination by an administrative
an appeal from an order, requirement,
be filed with the county recorder or registrar of
official, or a request for a variance, shall
titles for record. The order issued by the board of adjustment . shall include the legal
description of the property involved. The board by ordinance shall designate the county
the of this subdivision.
official or employee responsible for meeting requirements
Subd. 9. All decisions by the board of adjustment in granting variances or in hearing
from any administrative order, requirement, decision or determination shall be
appeals
final except that any aggrieved person or persons, or any department, board or commis-
of the state shall have the right to appeal within 30 days, after
4
sion of the jurisdiction or
receipt of notice of the decision, to the district court in the county in which the land is
located on questions of law and fact.
Amended by Laws 1974, c. 571, §§ 23 to 29; Laws 1976, c. 181, § 2; Laws 1978, c. 786, § 13, eff.
Laws 1979, Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 40; Laws 1981, c. 356, § 248; Laws 1984, c. 392, § 1;
• _7
April 6, 1978;
`*
. c
Laws 1986, c. 444.
1974 Amendment. Substituted "by ordi- 1978 Amendment. Added_ the last sentence to
J
nance" for the proviso at the end of subd. 1; subd. 7.
rewrote subds. 2, 5 and 6; and added subds. 7, 8 1979 Amendment. Added the fifth sentence
and 9. For former text see main volume. to subd. 7.
v
1976 Amendment. Changed the title of reg- Laws 1979, Ex.Sess., c. 2 did not c< <
effective date, but did include apl. d'
' -t -;
ister of deeds to county recorder. specific
100
79C -511 ZONING ¶ 872.2[1]
clear that the proposed variance would not be contrary to the
public interest.35
An essential element of the "unnecessary hardship" concept
requires that the hardship be "unnecessary ", i.e., that preserva-
tion of the sRIrit and intent of the zoning ordinance does not re
quire the denial of the variance request.'s Furthermore, the
"hardship" sufficient to require the grant of a varianeeurrlu it
b se ubstantial.and serious. This degree is reached where the ap-
plication of the ordinance to a parcel of land reduces its value
to the level of a confiscation .37
The applicant for a variance must accordingly show that the
affected property cannot yield a reasonable return if used for
a permitted purpose. Failure to obtain a reasonable return may
be evidenced by proof that the owner has been deprived of all
beneficial use of his property, that the ordinance restricts land
to nonproductive uses, or that the uses for which the land was
originally zoned are no longer feasible because of the enormous
35 Lipari v. Zoning Board of Easton.
516 A2d 110 (Pa Cmwlth Ct 1986).
36 See:
Alabama: W. Johnson v. Board of
Adjustment of Huntsville. 496 So2d
86 ( Ala App 1986); Ex parte Moore v.
Board of :adjustment of Mobile. 495
So2d 1112 (1986); Mareno v. Board
of Adjustment of Mobile, 495 So2d
1109 ( Ala App 1985).
_Massachusetts: Benjamin v. Bd. of
App.. 154 NE2d 913 (Mass 1959).
_llinnesotta: Hedlund v. City of Ma-
plewood.:366 N`P2d 624 (\Linn App
1985 ).
Xew York: Victory Blvd. Asso-
ciates v. City of New York, 58 NY2d
900. 460 NYS2d 501, 447 NE2d 49
(198:3).
Cf : Packer v. Hornsby, 221 Va 117,
267 SE2d 140 (1980) (pursuant to
state enabling act, variance should be
granted for unnecessary hardship
solely if the application of zoning re-
strictions would appear to be consti-
tutionally impermissible).
See also Plumb v. Bd. of Zoning
App.. 141 Conn 595. 108 A2d 899
(1954).
37 See:
Federal: Application: of Deveux
Foundation, Inc., :351 Pa 478.41 A2d
744. app dism'd 326 US 686 (1945).
Connecticut: Culinary Institute of
America v. Bd. of Zoning App., 143
Conn 257. 121 A2d 6:37 (1956).
Pennsylvania: Appeal of deBolton,
81 Pa Cmwlth 513, 474 A2d 706
(1984).
(Rel.47 -11/88 Pub.550)
872.2[l]. Law OF REAL PROPERTY 79C -512
expense associated with development for such purposes. A
variance is not warranted, however, merely because an-owner
seeks-to use his land in a more profitable manner. 39, - -._
38 See:.
Colorado Kinder Care Learning
Centers v. Board of Adjustment; 721
P2d 162 (Colo App 1986) (preschool's
operation at a modest profit insuffi-
cient to constitute exceptional and ex-
traordinary circumstance to warrant
a variance).
Connecticut: Goldreyer v. Bd: of
Zoning App.. 144 Conn 641. 136 A2d
789 (1957)(expenses associated with
development make permitted uses
prohibitive).
31aine: Driscoli v. Gheewalla, 441
A2d 1023 (1982).
New Jersey. Schiff v. Twp. of Maple
Shade. 149 NJ Super 448.374 A2d 43
(1977)(a variance may be granted
where the subject property is all but
unsuitable for permanent buildings
of any kind, no other use of the land
is economically feasible and the pro-
posed use is the one for which the land
is peculiarly fitted).
New Pork: Matter of Douglaston
Civic .Ass'n, Inc. v. Klein. 51 NY2d
963. 435 NYS2d 705, 416 NE2d 1041
(1980) (variance for construction of
tennis courts on swampy land, located
in a residential district, upheld on ev-
idence that the land could not yield a
reasonable return as zoned). Otto v.
Steinhilber, 282 NY 71. 24 NE2d 851
(1939) (property unable to yield a
reasonable return); Foster v. Saylor,
85 AD2d 876, 447 NYS2d 75 (4th
Dept 1981).
Oregon: Rutherford v. Arinstrong,
572 P2d 1331 (Ore App 19 7 7)(a vari-
ance may be granted for land zoned
for agricultural purposes only where
it is generally unsuitable for the pro-
duction of farm crops or livestock
considering the location, size, terrain,
soil conditions, drainage, flooding
and vegetation. It is irrelevant that
the property cannot be farmed as an
economically self— sufficient unit if
it is otherwise able to produce farm
crops and livestock). '
Pennsylvania: Poster Advertising
Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj., 408 Pa 248,
182 A2d 521 (1962)(permitted uses
were nonproductive); Moses v. Zon-
ing Hearing Bd., 87 Pa Cmwlth 443,
487 A2d 818 (1985); Malakoff v. Bd.
of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh,
72 Pa Cmwlth 1109, 456 A2d 1110
(1983); Immordino V. Zoning Hear-
ing Bd., Etc., 441 A2d 818 (Pa Cm-
wlth 1982).
Rhode Island. Patalano v. Zoning
Bd. of Rev., 112 RI 533, 312 A2d 580
(1973)(owner deprived of all benefi-
cial use of property).
Added advantage and monetary
benefit are not sufficient grounds,
standing alone, to warrant the grant -
ine of a variance. Banks v. City of
Bethany, 541 P2d 178 (Okla 1975).
39 See Kelly v. Zoning Hearing Bd.
of Iforeland, 87 Pa Cmwlth 534. 487
A2d 1043 (1985); Levin c. Zoning
Hearing Bd., 11 Pa Cmwlth 452, 314
A2d 579 (1974).
See also:
Delaware: Board of Adj. of New
Castle Countv v. Henderson Union
Ass' n. 374 A2d :3 ( Del 1977).
(Rel.47 -11/88 Pub.550) .
r
79C -515 ZONING ¶ 872.2[1]
neighborhood, and the cumulative effect of the deteriorating
area and confiscatory nature of the zoning restrictions is to ex-
acerbate the owner's hardship;' (3) where the property is un-
able to produce any income because .its structures are obsolete
or in a dilapidated condition;49 and (4) where the property is lo-
cated near significantly conflicting uses 50
An applicant for a variance must also show. that fulfillment
of his request will not impair use of adjacent property,_ adverse-
Iv affect the character of the neighborhood or endanger the na-
ture and purposes of the local zoning _plan.51 Some of the ways
n w
ihich a variant use might threaten the welfare of a communi-
ty are: disruption of the residential character of a neighborhood
But see Di Santo v. Zoning Bd. of
Adj., 410 Pa :331, 189 A2d 135
(1963)(if variances are granted to
borderline residential properties ad-
joining commercial uses, it will even-
tually lead to the encroachment upon
and complete destruction of the resi-
dential character of other properties
in the area).
48 See:
Indiana: Nelson v. Bd: of Zoning
App., 240 Ind 212, 162 NE2d 449
(1959).
Rhode Island. School Comm. of
Pawtucket v. Zoning Bd. of Rev., 86
RI 131, 133 A2d 734 (1957)(ninety
three percent of property in residen-
tial zone was used for commercial
purposes).
But see Fasani v. Rappaport. 30
AD2d 588, 290 NYS2d 279 (3d Dep't
1968).
49 See Messinger v. Zoning Bd. of
Rev.. 81 RI 159. 99 A2d 865
(1953)(owvner of tract containing an-
tiquated house unable to use or sell
land for residential purposes due to
size and condition of structure).
50 See Filanowski v. Zoning Bd. of
Adj., 439 Pa :360, 266 A2d 670 (1970).
But see Appeal of Lally, 404 Pa
174, 171 A2d 161 (1961)( unique cir-
cumstances not found where residen-
tial property situated near a number
of commercial uses).
51 See:
Federal. Sixth Camden Corp. v.
Evesham. 420 F Supp• 709 (D NJ
1976).
Alabama: W. Johnson v. Board of
Adjustment of the City of Huntsville,
496 So2d 36 (Ala App 1986).
Iowa: Greenawalt v. Board of Ad-
justment, :345 NW2d 537 (Iowa
1984).
Yew Jersey: Fobe Assoc. v. Mayor
and Council, Etc., 74 NJ 519,379 A2d
31 (1977).
(Re1.47 -11/88 Pub.550)
624 Minn. 366. NORTH WESTERN REPORTER, 2d SERIES
bag. The inmate's clothing is then r
washed in the bag. The procedure pre
vents the confusion involved in labeling
each inmates clothing and avoids theft. .
9. The prison has experimented with
different ways of fastening the laundry
bags but each method provides its own
dangers and risks. For example, prison
officials experimented with wire as a fas-
tener for the bags. Inmates discovered
that the wire could be used to jam door
locks. This presented a serious risk to
the security of the entire prison.
Since the decision regarding the laundry
pins; was discretionary, summary judgment
on this issue was proper.
Appellant's argument that equal protec-
tion prohibits governmental immunity for
unreasonable acts or omissions was con-
sidered and rejected in Bjorkquist v. City
of Robbinsdale, 352 N.W.2d 817 (Minn.Ct.
App-1-984). [5) 2. Appellant also argues that the
prison officials were negligent in supervis-
ing the recreation area. Appellant alleges
in his affidavit that no prison personnel
were present in the lower recreation area
at the time of the fight. If this were true,
it could establish negligent supervision.
[6) The state says that the appellant's
affidavit fails to establish a genuine issue
of material fact that the :downstairs gym
area was not supervised according to plans.
It would-be quite difficult for the appellant
to find witnesses to verify that there were
no guards in the downstairs gym: He and
the assailant were the only two downstairs
during the fight. There is no document
from any prison official indicating which
guard was assigned downstairs and where
he was at the time of the fight. Given the
impossibility of obtaining other witnesses,
appellant's signed affidavit is more than a
"conclusory statement; it establishes a
genuine issue of material fact. Therefore,
it was error to grant summary judgment
on that issue.
everse summary judgment on the issue of
negligent supervision, and remand that is-
sue for trial.
DECISION
We affirm summary judgment regarding
the decision to use the laundry pins. We
w
p 5 REY NUMBER SYSttM
T
Gordon HEDLUND, Appellant,
V.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CO-84 -1917.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 23, 1985.
On appeal from the County Court,
Ramsey County, Harold W. Schultz, J., af-
firming city's denial of variances to permit
construction of single - family residence, the
Court of Appeals, Huspeni, J., held that
denial was not arbitrary, unreasonable, or
capricious.
Affirmed.
1. Zoning and Planning a605
When reviewing decision of local gov-
erning body in zoning matter, Court of
Appeals considers that decision indepen-
dent of findings and conclusions of district
court.
2. Zoning and Planning 48-536
Since variance allows property to be
used .in manner forbidden b ,.zonin °rd'-
nanc _ variance, applicant has
to show that grant _is, appropriate.
3. Zoning and Planning a503
Denial of variances to permit construc-
tion of single - family residence on 40 -foot
wide by 120 -foot. deep lot in community
which required minimum lot width of 60
feet and total area of 10,000 square feet
was not improper, where applicant was ex-
i
ssue of
that is-
it,
A.,
a.
C .
pea ..11t
ice, the
Id that
able, or
:al gov-
ourt of
ndepen-
district
v to be
ng ordi-
.vy bur -
°opriate.
onstruc-
40 -foot
nmunity
hof60
a)
W.
l
t
l
T_n
AM
Z
HEDLUND v. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Minn. 625
Cite as 366 N.W2d 624 (MlnnApp. 1983)
perienced buyer who was familiar with risk OPINION
of zoning restrictions, development would
be inconsistent with intent of zoning code
and would result in dwelling out of charac-
ter with existing neighborhood develop-
ment, and strict enforcement would not
cause undue hardship unique to individual
lot. M.S.A. § 467.357, subd. 6(2).
4. Zoning and Planning a5
Minnesota legislature has delegated to
municipalities power to plan for use of land
within their boundaries by establishing zon-
ing and planning ordinances.
5. Zoning and Planning x493
Municipalities may grant variances to
their zoning and planning ordinances if
strict enforcement would cause undue
hardship. M.S.A. §§ 462.351, 462.357,
subd. 6(2).
6. Zoning and Planning x488
Municipal decision - making body has
broad discretionary power to deny applica-
tion for zoning variance.
7. Eminent Domain x2(1.2)
City's refusal to grant variances to
permit construction of single - family resi-
dence on lot which did not meet minimum
size requirements was not governmental
taking of land, where owner, who was ex-
perienced real estate developer, did not
properly research applicable zoning ordi-
nances before purchase. U.S.C.A. Const.
Amend. 5.
Syllabus by the Court
The City of Maplewood had legally suf-
ficient reasons and a factual basis for deny-
ing appellant's request for variances.
Seldon H. Caswell, North St. Paul, for
appellant.
Patrick J. Kelly, St. Paul, for respon-
dents.
Considered and decided by POPOVICH,
C.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ.,
with oral argument waived.
HUSPENI, Judge.
Gordon Hedlund appeals from a trial
court judgment declaring that the City of
Maplewood's denial of an application for
zoning variances was not arbitrary or un-
reasonable, a deprivation of equal protec-
tion, or a deprivation of the use and enjoy-
ment of a lot without compensation. Hed-
lund contends that Maplewood's denial of
the variances constitutes an undue hard-
ship because a residence cannot be con-
structed on the lot without the variances.
He also contends the denial of the varianc-
es constitutes an unconstitutional govern-
ment taking of the land. We affirm.
FACTS
Gordon Hedlund, an experienced real es-
tate developer, acquired a 40' x 125' lot in
Maplewood from the state at an auction of
tax forfeited lands. The property was for-
feited to the state in 1969. Maplewood
authorized its sale in August of 1971.
Hedlund perfected his interest by a certifi-
cate of sale of forfeited lands in 1982 and
then discovered that he could not build a
dwelling on the land without three varianc-
es.
The 5,000 square foot lot is undeveloped.
It is located in an area which was originally
platted in 1887. The current zoning re-
quirements have been in effect since the
early 1960's. It is zoned R -1, single - family
residence, and is designated for low density
use by the comprehensive plan which was
adopted in 1973.
Hedlund inspected the lot and observed
the surrounding land uses before bidding.
There is a single dwelling located on a 125'
wide parcel north of Hedlund's lot. South
of his lot is a single dwelling on an 80' wide
lot. To the west, there are single dwellings
on 80' wide ' lots, and to the east there are
single dwellings on 100' -120' wide lots.
Hedlund has bought many parcels of tax
forfeited land. He does not always check
the zoning and comprehensive use plan be-
fore buying. He has "bought betting —
thinking I can sell it to a neighbor, I can
626 Minn. 366 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER. 2d SERIES
get the council to change their mind." He
generally has encountered little difficulty,
but has had to obtain variances for minor
problems. Several years prior to his pur-
chase of the Maplewood lot, he checked
with various cities about building on 40'
lots because he had run into trouble with a
40' wide tax forfeited lot which he pur-
chased in Fridley. At that time, he talked
to someone in Maplewood, whose name he
cannot recall, and was informed 40' lots
were buildable.
After Hedlund purchased the 40 -foot lot,
his brother -in -law applied to the City of
Maplewood for the three variances which
would be needed to construct a single -fami-
ly residence on the lot. Sections 36-69 and
30 -8(f)1 of the city code require a lot to be
not less than 10,000 square feet in order to
build such a dwelling. Hedlund's lot is
5,000 square feet. Sections 36-59 and 30-
8(0) require a lot to be 75' wide at the
building setback line. Hedlund's lot is 40'
wide at the setback line. Section 30 -8(F)1
requires a lot to have at least 60' of front-
age. Hedlund's lot has 40' of frontage.
Maplewood denied similar area and width
variance requests made by others in 1973
and 1982. Since the adoption of the com-
prehensive plan in 1973, it has never grant-
ed multiple variances which would permit
the construction of a single - family resi-
dence on a 5,000 square foot lot.
The planning commission recommended
that the variances be denied because: (1)
development of the lot "would be inconsist-
ent with the intent of- the zoning code re-
sulting in a dwelling out of character with
the existing neighborhood development ";
(2) an approval would be inconsistent with
the denial of similar requests; (3) neighbor-
hood density would further exceed the al-
lowable maximums; (4) strict. enforcement
would not cause an undue hardship unique
to the individual lot in question; and (5)
any hardships would be self- imposed since
the code requirements have been in effect
since the 1960's. The city council accepted
this recommendation and denied the vari-
ances citing the same reasons given by the
planning commission.
Hedlund petitioned fora writ of manda-
mus to compel the-city to issue the varianc-
es. 'The trial court found that the council's
reasons for denying variances were sup-
ported by the facts and dismissed Hed-
lund's petition.
ISSUE
Did the City of Maplewood act arbitrari-
ly, unreasonably, capriciously, or beyond
its legal powers in refusing to grant the
three variances requested by Hedlund?
ANALYSIS .
[1-3] When reviewing a decision of a
local governing body in a zoning matter,
this court considers that decision indepen-
dent of the findings and conclusions of the
district court. Northwestern College v.
City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865, 868
(Minn.1979). Inasmuch as a variance-al-
lows a property to be used in _a _ manner
Torbidden by zoning ordinances, ._the-- appli-
cant fora variance has a heavy burden .to____
show that the _great_is_appropriater -Lugex
v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d_ 609-6a
(Minn.-1980). Based upon an independent
deterination of the record, this court con-
cludes that Hedlund has not met this bur-
den and that the City of Maplewood's deni-
al of the requested variances was reason-
able.
[4-6] The Minnesota legislature has
delegated to municipalities the power to
plan for the use of the land within their
boundaries by establishing zoning and plan-
ning ordinances. VanLandschoot v. City
of Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 503, 507
-(Minn.1983); Minn.Stat. § 462.351 (1982).
Municipalities may grant variances to their
zoning and planning ordinances. if strict
enforcement would cause undue hardship.
Id. at 507; Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2)
(1982). A municipal_ decision- making body_,
however, has broad discretionary powero
eny_ an application for a, variance. Van -
Landschoot,_336 N_ .W.2d at 57.
Hedlund claims that Maplewood is ob-
ligated to grant the three variances that he
requested because without them he cannot
1
1
I
1
I
I
t
b-
ie
of
.= �b11'�5.`: iii � "arm lc'a`�.•'%q'tl r` J°°°�.TF�ct�Yfi �;�R.16�. �._ri -tti �- dNi.Y';
HEDLUND v. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Cite as 366 N.W.2d 624 (M1nn.App. 1985)
zoning regulations or examination of the
premises.
3 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning,
Section 18.43 (1977).
Minn. 627
build a single - family residence on the lot.
Essentially his argument is the variances
should be granted because of undue hard-
ship.
Undue hardship means:
the property in question cannot be put to
seasonable use if used under_conditions_
aff�wed by official controls, the_plight_of
the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to his property not created. by the
landowner, and the variance, if. granted,
will not alter the essential character. of
the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hard-
ship if _reasonable use for the property_
exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2) (1982).
Hedlund visited the lot in question and
observed that the single - family residences
immediately surrounding the lot in ques-
tion were all built on lots which were at
least twice as wide as the lot he was consid-
ering purchasing. He did not read the
applicable ordinances even though he knew
that certain cities such as Fridley and
White Bear Lake do not permit building on
a 40' wide lot. Further, the mailing which
advised him of the auction stated that the
land to be auctioned was governed by local
zoning codes. Finally, Hedlund is an.expe-
Maplewood does not contest the fact that
without the variances the lot cannot be put
to a reasonable use. Rather, the Maple-
wood City Council found that Hedlund did
not meet the remainder of the criteria for
undue hardship as set forth in Minn.Stat.
§ 462.357 and denied the variances on that
basis. Three of the five reasons given by
the council for the denial are based on the
remaining criteria of Minn.Stat. § 462.357.
As such, the reasons are legally sufficient.
In this case, each of the reasons is sup-
ported by the facts.
One of the reasons given by Maplewood
for the denial is that any hardships would
be self - imposed since the code require-
ments have been in effect since the 1960's.
Under the statute, the plight of the land-
owner must not be "created by the land-
owner." Minn.Stat. § 467.357, subd. 6(2).
A person who purchases land with
knowledge, actual or constructive, of the
zoning restrictions which are in effect at
the time of such purchase, is said to have
created for himself whatever hardship
such restrictions entail.
3 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning,
Section 18.42 (1977). This self -created
hardship rule applies:
whether the applicant purchased the land
with actual or constructive knowledge
that the desired use was prohibited, and
whether the knowledge was available to
the applicant through a reading of the
rienced buyer of tax forfeited land. He
acknowledges that if he does not check the
zoning ordinances and land use plan, he is
"betting." Under these circumstances, we
are compelled to conclude that Hedlund did,
in fact, create his own hardship.
Maplewood also denied the variances be-
cause development of the lot would be in-
consistent with the intent of the zoning
code and would result in a dwelling out of
character with existing neighborhood devel-
opment. Minn.Stat. § 467.357, subd. 6(2),
provides that the essential character of the
locality must not be altered if the variance
is granted. There is unrebutted testimony
that the intent of the low density limita-
tions and the large lot size requirement is
to preserve the open space character of this
particular area. Hedlund's lot is only half
the size of the lot required by the code for
the area. The variance he requested is not
minimal. Thus, the essential character of
open space would be altered if the variance
was allowed.
Maplewood further denied the variances
because strict enforcement would not cause
an undue hardship unique to the individual
lot in question. Minn.Stat. § 467.357, subd.
6(2), requires that the undue hardship be
caused by circumstances unique to the
property. In this case, there are three
nearby 40' lots in addition to Hedlund's.
Maplewood denied similar area and width
i
t
i
�i
628 Minna 366 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER, 2d SERIES
requests in 1973 and 1982. Thus Hed-
lund's circumstances are not unique to his
property.
In sum, three of the reasons given by
Maplewood for denying the variances are
legally sufficient and each is supported by
the facts. We need not consider. the re-
maining two reasons to conclude that Ma-
plewood's action in denying the variances
was reasonable.
Hedlund claims this case is identical.to
Currie v. Young, 285 Minn. 387, 173
N.W.2d 410 (1969), a case in which the
supreme court affirmed a writ of manda-
mus compelling Minneapolis to grant a set-
back variance which would allow the build-
ing of a dwelling on an undersized lot.
Currie is clearly distinguishable. The Min-
neapolis zoning ordinance in Currie specifi-
cally stated that a single- family dwelling.
could be built, regardless of the size of the
lot, on a lot within the definition of a "lot
of record" pursuant to the ordinance, as
long as the other requirements of the ordi-
nance were met. The supreme court held
that "the ordinance itself, when the condi-
tions it described are complied with, re-
quires that the variances be granted."
There is no similar language in the Maple-
wood ordinance at issue compelling the
granting of a variance.
(7I Hedlund also claims that there has
been an unconstitutional taking of the land
parcel at issue because a residence cannot
be constructed on the land. This argument
is without merit.
For there to be an unconstitutional tak-
ing a landowner must demonstrate that
he has been deprived, through govern-
mental action or inaction, of all reason-
able uses of his land.
Czech v. City of Blaine, 312 Minn. 535, 253
N.W.2d 272, 274 (1977) (citations omitted).
Hedlund, is an experienced real estate
developer. He did not properly research
the applicable zoning ordinances before he
bought the land. His predicament is self -
imposed. This court cannot conclude that
such circumstances constitute a govern-
mental taking of the land.
DECISION
Maplewood had legally sufficient reasons
and a factual basis for denying Hedlund's
request for variances. The city's action
was not unreasonable, capricious, or be-
yond its legal powers.
Affirmed.
w O
Juli -Ann THOMPSON, as Trustee for
the Heirs of Dennis Ray Thompson,
Deceased, Respondent,
V.
Douglas G. HILL, Appellant.
No. C5-84 -1430.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 23, 1985.
The spouse of automobile passenger
who drowned when vehicle fell through ice
while driving on frozen river brought
wrongful death action. The District Court,
Winona County, Lawrence T. Collins, J.,
entered judgment in favor of wife, finding
driver 607o negligent and deceased husband
407o negligent and entered judgment on
jury verdict, deducting full amount of no-
fault benefits received by surviving spouse,
and driver appealed. The Court of Ap-
peals, Nierengarten, J., held that: (1) doc-
trine of primary assumption of risk did not
apply; (2) evidence was sufficient to sup-
port finding of negligence on part of driv-
er; (3) driver was not entitled to jury in-
struction on secondary assumption of risk;
and (4) reduction of judgment by full
amount of economic loss benefits paid by
no -fault insurer was correct.
Affirmed.
i
a
Schaefer Rd
Street #
Lot Width.
Lot Depth
Lot Area
5004
165.4
187
30,929.8
5008
150
220
33,000
5012
220
150
33,000
5016
225
230
51,750
5011
261
75
19,575
5017
261
100
26,100
5021
260
105
27,300
5013
290
199
57,710
5013
199
545
108,455
5117
200.4
542
108,616.8
51.25
668
163
108,884
5201
163
660
107,580
5209
163
320
52,160
5217
425
164
69,700
5200
668
200
133,600
5224
665
570
379,050
1 ,347,41 0.6
84,213.1625
Street
6321
6519
6501
6413
6409
6405
6401
Lot Width
264
173.5
140
150
150
150
167
I nterl achen
Lot Depth
Lot Area
260
68.640
190
32,965
190
26.600
387
58,050
387
58.050
387
58.050
200
33.400
335.755
47,965
Ridge Road
Street #
Lot Depth
Lot Width
Lot Area
5120
310
136.8
42,408
5116
310
130.1
40,331
5112
310
144
44,640
5108
310
120
37,200
5100
310
240
74,400
5016
310
136.7
42,377
5012
310
120
37,200
5008
130.5
183
23,881.5
550?
176.3
145
25,563.5
5117
310
360
111,600
5109
325
130
42,250
5101
325.2
104
63, 088.8
5025
327
150
49,050
5021
312.3
104
32,479.2
5013
313
104
32,552
5009
313
104
32,552
731,573
45,723.3125
Ave. Lot size
Ridge road
45,723
Interlachcen
47,965
Schaefer Road
84,213
Dahlquist
33,500
i
' Objective: Protect and manage lakes, ponds and wetlands for storm water
retention areas, wildlife areas, and amenity areas, and lessen impacts from nutrient
and sediment .input.
Policies: Utilize waterbodies and man -made ponding areas for the retention
and detention of storm water to reduce flooding potentials and stabilize lake and
pond levels.
Restrict encroachments below the ordinary high water marks of Type
3, 4, and 5 wetlands.
Require the dedication of or the grant of a scenic and open space
easement over all land adjacent to and 100 feet upland of naturally occurring lakes
and ponds in conjunction with the subdivision or development of property.
Require the dedication of or the grant of a scenic easement over
Type 3, 4, and 5 wetlands in conjunction with the subdivision or dedication of
property.
Provide for periodic maintenance dredging of storm sewer outfalls
into lakes and ponds.
Continue the monitoring of physical, chemical, and biological parameters
of major lakes and ponds at appropriate intervals.
Prepare or acquire public information materials regarding the
reduction of nutrient loadings of waterbodies and watercourses.
Continue to perform and monitor experiments with aeration as a
means of reducing algal blooms and mitigating effects of nutrient loading.
Conduct experiments with the harvesting of aquatic vegetation as
an alternative to treatment with aquatic herbicides.
Encourage owners of property riparian to lakes and ponds to maintain
emergent aquatic vegetation and shoreline vegetation for filtering and wildlife
benefits.
Consider limited excavations in appropriate wetlands to provide
open water for increased diversity of wildlife habitats.
Objective: Protect and manage remnants of major plant communities.
Policies: Preserve remnants of tall prairie grass, floodplain forest, oak
savanna and upland woodlands within the park and open space system.
COUNTY WELFARE BOARD
;brary References
Social Security and Public Welfare X11.
C.J.S. Social Security and Public Welfare § 17
EVELOPMENT, ZONING
ection
94.312.
Relation to other county authority.
14.361.
Official map.
94.362.
Variances; adverse effect on environ-
ment.
399, art. 1, § 29; 1986, c. 416, § 11
"he chair of the board of county commissioners,
he auditor of the county, and the treasurer of
-he county. The chair of the board of county
`ommissioners shall be president of the commis
;ion, the county auditor shall be secretary of the
commission, and the county treasurer shall be
.-.he treasurer of the commission. The secretary
shall keep all of the records and accounts of the
commission, and the treasurer.shall keep .a cor-
rect account of its receipts and expenditures."
571, § 51
Prior to repeal § 394.16 was amended by Laws
1971, c. 23, § 34 and Laws 1973, c. 35, § 68.
.)PMENT, ZONING
:ling and zoning activities
for text of Subd. 11
S 51.
Subjectivity, expression, and privacy: Prob•
lems of aesthetic regulation. Stephen F.
Williams. 1977, 62 Minn. Law Review 1.
Notes of Decisions
1. In general
Where district court in granting motion to
vacate default judgment against county was con'
vinced that a meritorious defense on the merits
PLANNING
existed, the county's failure to set forth with
particularity the nature of the defense was de-
terminative, and hence supreme court would re-
mand entire matter to district court to allow its
consideration of the defense in relation to the
merits of the petition for writ of mandamus; in
addition, the district court must evaluate peti-
tioner's assertion that the particular tract of
land had been classified inconsistently as resi-
dential for purposes of assessment and as agri-
cultural for zoning purposes. Thompson v.
Spring Lake Tp., 1977, 257 N.W.2d 388.
For there to be an unconstitutional taking a
landowner must demonstrate that he has been
deprived, through governmental action or inac-
tion, of all the reasonable uses of his land.
Czech v. City of Blaine, 1977, 312 Minn. 535, 253
N.W.2d 272.
Denial of application of owner of mobile home
park for. rezoning was an unconstitutional taking
of property where the general characteristics of
the property virtually rendered it useless for any
394.22. Definitions
Vr
§ 394.22
other use than a site for a mobile home park-
1d.
When city council acts on a rezoning applica-
tion, it exercises a legislative power and judicial
review is narrow. Id.
In order to successfully challenge a city coun-
cil decision when it acts within its legislative
capacity, proof must be submitted to affirmative-
ly. establish either an unconstitutional taking or
an 'action in excess of the powers delegated to
the legislative body. Id.
A city, county and town could not delegate
planning and zoning power to a joint committee
established by agreement pursuant to St.1976,
§ 471.59. Op.Atty.Gen., 1007, July 8, 1977.
2. Ordinances
County board is required to enforce town zon-
ing ordinances only where the town has contract-
ed with the county board for planning and en-
forcement. Scinocca v. St. Louis County Bd. of
Com'rs, 1979, 281 N.W.2d 659.
[See main volume for text of subds. 1 to 3]
Subd. 4. "Municipality" means a city however organized.
Subd. 5. Repealed by Laws 1974, c. 571, § 51.
Subd. 6. "Official control" means legislatively defined and enacted policies, standards,
precise detailed maps, and other criteria, all of which control the physical development of
a municipality or a county or any part thereof or any detail thereof, and are the means of
translating into ordinances all or any part of the general objectives of the comprehensive
plan. Such official controls may include but are not limited to ordinances establishing
zoning, subdivision controls, site plan rules, sanitary codes, building codes, housing codes,
and official maps.
Subd. 7. "Conditional use" means a land use or development as defined by ordinance
that would not be appropriate generally but may_ be allowed with appropriate restrictions
as provided by official controls upon a finding that (1) certain conditions as detailed in the
zoning ordinance exist, and (2) the use or development conforms to the comprehensive
land use plan of the county and (3) is compatible with the existing neighborhood.
Subd. 8. "Nonconformity" means any legal use, structure or parcel of land already in .
existence, recorded, or authorized before the adoption of official controls or amendments
thereto that would not have been permitted to become established under the terms of the
official controls as now written, if the official controls had been in effect prior to the date
it was established, recorded or authorized.
(—Subd. 9. "Comprehensive plan" means the policies, statements, goals, and interrelated
Plans for private and public land and water use, transportation, and community facilities
including recommendations for plan execution, documented in texts, ordinances and maps
which constitute the guide for the future development of the county or any portion of the
county.
Subd. 10. "Variance" means any modification or variation of official controls where it
is determined that, by reason of exceptional circumstances, the strict enforcement of the
official controls would cause unnecessary hardship.
Subd. 11. "Town" means any town, including those with the powers of a statutory
city pursuant to law.
Subd. 12. "Official map" means a map adopted in accordance with section 394.361
which may show existing county roads and county state aid highways, proposed future
county roads and highways, the area needed for, widening existing county roads and
93
,A(.a �lol�r r7 I�3
O'CON NOR & HAN NAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3800 IDS CENTER
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -2254
(612) 341 -3800
FAX (612) 343 -1256
PAUL B. ZISLA
(612) 343-1258 INCLUDINGTHE FORMERFIRM MACINTOSH &COMMERS
August 25, 1992
Mayor and City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Subdivision Application Case No. S-92-1
Our Client - Harvey Golub
Our File No. 52200 -1
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Our client owns the property at 5200 Schaefer
"Golub Parcel "). We understand that CDS Partners
subdivision application for the adjacent property
(the "Dalquist Parcel "). On behalf of our client,
consider two recommendations for the subdivision.
WASHINGTON, D.C. OrrICE
SUITE 800
1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE N.W.
WASMINGTON, D.C. 20006-3403
12021 687 -1400
TELEX 89 -7420
FAX 12021 466 -2198
MADRID OrFICE
LA RINCONADA,
28023 MADRID, SPAIN
10111 44 341 575 -09 6 357 -2251
FAX 10111 341 577 -0759
Road (the
submitted a
to the north
we ask you to
First, development should not impair the natural features of
the site. It should preserve the hydraulic efficiency, natural
character, and beauty of the ponds on the parcel. Therefore, the
city should enforce the easement requirements of Ordinance No.
801 -A4. If the city determines it has to relax the easement
standards to encourage sensible development of the Dalquist
Parcel, the city should grant only a minimal variance to the
standards.
Second, the developer should remedy the damage that resulted
from installing a driveway less than 100 feet from the south
pond. The driveway runs from Schaefer to the house under
construction on the Dalquist Parcel. To the detriment of the
Golub Parcel, the driveway eliminated vegetation and disrupted
the natural character of the pond area near the property line
between the Golub and Dalquist Parcels. If the developer had
subdivided the Dalquist Parcel before constructing the house,
Ordinance 801 would have preserved the natural area. Although
the developer may not have violated any zoning laws, the pond
area should have been protected. Accordingly, the developer
should add trees, shrubs or other plantings along the driveway.
O'CON NOR & HAN NAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mayor and City Council
August 25, 1992
Page 2
The suggestions made in this letter support the city's
efforts to assure compatibility between the built and natural
environments. Future residents, neighbors and the city will all
benefit. Thank you for the opportunity to address the council
about the CDS application.
Very truly yours,
O'CONNOR & HANNAN
Paul B. Zisla
PBZ /j s
SEP -00 -1992 14:48 FROM Minnesota Planning TO 99277645 P.01
Post-it" brand fax transmittal memo 767110 of pag" • '1
"Jac,Kte I L� �btdn ��4 �
/^C&
REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEEET
This is a request to have an Environmental Assessment Worksheet completed by the state of
Minnesota on the property under consideration for subdivision by the city of Edina. The
property description is the Mark Dalquist Addition Subdivision of Harold Woods Lane and
Schaefer Road, Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision #325, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
The proposers of this project are.. Mark Dalquist, former owner of the property, Ronald
E. Clark, developer and David Schall acting as a partnership, CDS Partners, 5115 Edina
Industrial Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota, 55435.
This subdivision involves splitting the 10.46 acres into four lots that have access from
Harold Woods Lane and a fifth lot with frontage and access off of Schaefer Road. The
smallest lot is 1.19 gross acres and the largest lot is proposed at 4.54 acres. Two ponds are
included in this subdivision, the south pond is under DNR jurisdiction (wetland 27 -782w) and
the north pond is not. Over 4 acres of the 10.46 acres is water. Edina ordinance requires a
100 foot conservation easement on all water bodies. Variances of 75 feet are being sought on
the south pond lots as well as one of the lots on the north pond and a 30 foot variance is being
sought on lot #3. Lot #1 also has a road which is in need of a variance on setback. Much of
the buildable land is located in a Zone B flood plane map. The elevations of the land are very
low, the water table is very high. This can be seen on the accompanying topographical map.
The environmental effects of developing this land.in the manner proposed are of great
concern to us. This could lead to potential interference with water fowl nesting areas which
support many wood ducks, geese, black crowned night heron, snowy egrets, mallards and
other duck varieties. This area also supports a multitude of other wild life forms; turtles,
pheasnats, fox, deer, wood chuck, piliated woodpeckers, great horned owls, turtles, raccoon,
etc:. Construction will destroy these areas. It has been established that the lay of the land will
require much fill to build these 6500 square foot homes (min.). The city of Edina requires all
homes to be built over basements. The building sites on several lots would require anywhere
from 5 to 10 feet of fill to meet this code.
With addition of fill to this land, the drainage is going to change. Already this area is
subject to inadequate drainage. The north pond has no outflow. Any change in the
topography of the land is bound to alter the shore line, especially when you take into
consideration the massive amounts of hard surfaces that will be added to the land; roadway,
driveways, decks, terraces, pools (one is being constructed now). All this takes away from the
(presently poor) drainage capacity of the area. What will be the results of these changes? What
will happen to the other properties on the ponds if we get a rainfall exceeding a normal
year's percipitation, 5 years above normal rainfall? What will happen to the wildlife habitat
and the nesting areas along the established shoreline?
I have enclosed copies of the proposed subdivision and the topographical map of this area.
An aerial Hurd photograph is also included for you to refer to the ponds and wetlands that are
i
SEP -08 -1992 14:49 FROM Minnesota Planning TO 99277645 P.02
involved. If the preliminary plat is approved one can easily see that construction will impose
great hardship on the wildlife habitat and the drainage of the area.
We are asking you to please review this subdivision proposal as soon as possible. The city
council is meeting on this issue on Tues. September 8th, 1992. If the proposal is passed
without these important issues being taken into consideration and studied carefully, we will be
subjected to an ill- conceived subdivision that will destroy our ponds and fill our low lying
areas with standing water.
If you have any questions about our concerns, please contact Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge
Road, Edina, Minnesota, 55436. My telephone number is 612- 935 -8084.
Thank you, ,Q
/Wt 4-Jer-
Betsy it /led Pmt. 71,1 ?A
Robinson and Ted Pier
5021 Ridge Road
Edina, Mn. 55436
Enclosures and Petition
SEP -00 -1992 14:49 FROM Minnesota Planning
TO 9927.7645 P.03
C SEP 199p
ti
QUAcrry s tNTAL
RD
PETITION REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
We the undersigned citizens of Edina request that a Minnesota Environmental Assessment Worksheet be
compiled and completed on the proposed subdivision of Harold Woods Lane and Schaefer Road, Lot 11,
Auditor's Subdivision 11325, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Attached you will find a description of the
proposal and those concerns that might have a substantially adverse impact on the environment and
wildlife habitat.
NAME MAILING ADDRESS PH. 11
2.
r _
4. 1, i& ( z, ce lew 0'
5 G%, 41A n
'-' ..&s
/(
? R1.06F- AZ
10-
/7
pas fogy
93�,7z�
4 Ile
733 -o64-)4
73 3
,(
1F33 ;Z,;U/
TSY ? 7 of
9 �- G a'7
SEP -08 -1992 14:49 FROM Minnesota Planning I TO 99277645 P.04
PETITION REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
We the undersigned citizens of Edina request that a Minnesota Environmental Assessment Worksheet be
compiled and completed on the proposed subdivision of Harold Woods Lane and Schaefer Road, Lot 11,
Auditor's Subdivision +325, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Attached you will find a description of the
proposal and those concerns that aright have a substantially adverse impact on the environment and
wildlife habitat.
NAME MAM-G- ADDRESS
13.
14.
�6. 1110 Sao �
17. Y'
18. 1 "
PH• It
17
9'3/,
ok -Sir -
''Ae 933-357
x"01 .-\7 -'
19
20.
21 ^ ••
22. Sp� d—Ai
23.
'�,. os4 7� �� ✓Q� -°'�Y w �''"'�- U 'z y
Jlr
i4.
SEP -08 -1992 14:50 FROM Minnesota Planning TO
99277645 P.05
PETITION REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
We the undersigned citizens of Edina request that a Minnesota Environmental Assessment Worksheet be
compiled and completed on the proposed subdivision of Harold.Woods Lane and Schaefer Road,
Lot 11,
Auditor's Subdivision #325. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Attached you will find a description of the
proposal and those concerns that might have a substantially adverse impact on the environment and
wildlife habitat.
26.
27.
2s.
29.
NAME MAIL G DDRESS
Sao �� q 3s a�3
sal G tea ` ct -3 - aa-ug
A7
3s.711�. ����� -�- � Sa-a5' °''"""',"' a g3S ``fay
7 4-V guff
ss �
4-443 i4.vCe In 4358 70 g
<-01-3 )ZA-Qvj,v '7>-*i CMS -i
,P�� 7
:37,
•ISAWM -I *l; �-!,FAV
'34XDRAFT MINUTES SEPTEMBER 2, 1992
LD -92 -7 6421 Mildred Avenue
Lots 17, IS, 19, and part of Lot 20
Block 10, Normandale 2nd Addition
Mr. Larsen informed the commission -the subject property
comprises 3 1/2 platted 50 foot wide single dwelling unit lots in
Normandale 2nd Addition. There is an existing dwelling unit on the
northerly portion of the property. The southerly two lots are
vacant. The proposed lot division would split the southerly 1 1/2
lots to create a new buildable lot. Both lots would meet or exceed
Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot dimensions and area.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the 6400 block of Mildred Avenue has
one lot 70 feet wide and one lot 115 feet wide, the rest are
between 75 and 100 feet wide. The proposed split would create one
lot at 100 feet and a new lot 75 feet wide.
Mr. Larsen concluded that although the lots are generally
compatible with the development pattern of the block. Staff
believes a more even split of the property would be desirable.
Staff would suggest adding 10 feet of width to the new lot. This
would results in lots of 90 and 85 feet in width. Staff would
recommend approval.of the lot division with this modification.
Commissioner Workinger asked if the recommended split by staff
has to do with the topography or is it .just to balance the lots.
Mr. Larsen responded that it is a little of both. He said the
topography on this site has steep slopes and the larger width would
add flexibility with house placement. Mr. Larsen also pointed out
that maintaining consistent lot size is also what staff wants to
achieve.
Commissioner McClelland asked if the proponents agree with the
recommended split by .staff. Mr. Larsen explained that the
proponents leave this time every year for Arizona and he has not
been able to contact them regarding his recommendation.
Continuing, Mr. Larsen said he was told that their son would be
contacting staff to request the results of this meeting.
Commissioner Byron pointed out that he believes the split
makes sense, and is preferable to what is present. He pointed out
at present the proponents own 3 1/2 legally platted lots and this
proposal brings the 3 1/2 lots down to 2 lots that are more
consistent with what is present in this neighborhood.
Commissioner McClelland moved approval. Commissioner Hale
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 2, 1992
LD -92 -7 6421 Mildred Avenue
Lots 17, 18, 19, and part of Lot 20
Block 10, Normandale 2nd Addition
The subject property comprises 3 1/2 platted 50 foot wide
single dwelling unit lots in Normandale 2nd Addition. There is an
existing dwelling unit on the northerly portion of the property.
The southerly two lots are vacant. The proposed lot division would
split the southerly 1 1/2 lots to create a new buildable lot. Both
lots would meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot
dimensions and area.
The 6400 block of Mildred Avenue has one lot 70 feet wide and
one lot 115 feet wide, the rest are between 75 and 100 feet wide.
The proposed split would create one lot at 100 feet (for the
existing home) and a new lot 75 feet wide.
Recommendation:
Although the lots are generally compatible with the
development pattern of the block. Staff believes a more even split
of the property would be desirable. Staff would suggest adding 10
feet of width to the new lot. This would results in lots of 90 and
85 feet in width. Staff would recommend approval of the lot
division with this modification.
CARDARELLE d ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS
&W FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 653"
CERTIFICATE OIL SURVEY
Survey For: / IAR6�4A /%02Z
Book !L0 Pop
y
W
Q
0
RETAINING
U.4LL.
/BIjT PARK /Ndi
I I� PRIVE
SETA /N /NCB
ii 0 WAL(_
N Q
i
j —
1n 1
1
i
Z4.0
10 0
O c;
N J�
2D.O
0
4.0
oQo — -
�t
PQ2C�L /
IL
?6 3
23.5
N �
of 2j o �D
I \ 1
N
c r
�,
v
Q �
/0 3 OC-�GK i
I,j ga- rAININ[q wA(L Q
/35.0
� PAlzcEL Z
I
1 i
n
'Tt�AC. SI"T� Z5,&25 SQ. IrT"
Pxyec 4r= L 1 l3, 5oc �
PA/ec�L 2
/c,/25 SQ. FT.
i ►.r.►, t ttllp Mi. �.. w....r ti....a ..r�...r ..r . .� .� �. �...i..w.r 4oTS /7 /8, /9, ANO SDVM 1 /Z of
'.� ZD;
(j("DGK /0�• /YD/eMA/VDA1.E DD 7% pis G . w ad .I l.. l c ii of .0 bvUd6..11 «.....rA oil
vir►l..aweech wt% if wy. from w «.w IMi iorw/t� by t.. IN �/ 11rbVE/�16 ,» �_
�a
CARDARELLE 1 ASSOMMSr WC.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lot 17, Lot 18, Lot 19, and the South 1/2 of Lot 20, Block 10,
NORMANDALE 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Lot 17 and the South 35 feet of Lot 18, Block 10, NORMANDALE 2ND
ADDITION
and
The northerly 15 feet of Lot 18, all of Lot 19, and the South 25 feet
of Lot 20, Block 10, NORM AND ALE 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Code Sections 810 and 850;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 810
and 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as
separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no
further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the
pertinent code sections of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of
this Council as may be provided for by those sections.
.11:
o
67
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: g September, 1992
Subject: Browndale Bridge
Feasibility Study
(Including Traffic
Analysis)
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
V • A
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
T' o Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Review schedule of activities and adjust schedule if so
desired.
Info /Background
The issue of the Browndale traffic review is part of a larger
issue. The staff initially started reviewing the Browndale /
Country Club area as part of the rehabilitation or modifica-
tion of the Browndale Bridge. This bridge is currently the
only restricted structure in the City based on weight limits.
Staff had started collecting traffic data in the neighborhood
this summer to establish base line conditions. The traffic
data collection process was noticed by neighbors and questions
started to arise about speed and volumes in the Country Club
District. Additionally, a petition came forth from Browndale
residents concerning speed and volume.
The action taken to date involves a Traffic Safety Committee
recommendation and City Council approval of that recommenda-
tion. The recommendation was: (a) conduct speed surveys with
an unmarked police vehicle during the morning, evening and
noon rush hour periods, (b) conduct same during the period of
4 -6 PM on Sundays, (c) incorporate this data with the current
Report /Recommendation
Item V.A.
Page Two
study being undertaken, but specifically cite the rush hour
figures, (d) contact Edina Public School District and relay
concerns of children crossing Browndale Avenue to get bus
stop, and (e) conduct a sight line survey on Edgebrook Drive
to ascertain if the parking should be prohibited on west side
of Browndale.
Staff will complete Items a thru a and return with this
information to Traffic Safety Committee this November.
Additionally, staff will continue to collect additional
traffic volume and license survey information in the Country
Club District to identify existing conditions in the District.
The traffic data collection is only a portion of the review on
the Browndale Bridge issue.
Additional issues to be addressed would be:
1. Evaluate structural and functional adequacy of the
bridge (structural engineer).
2. Develop and evaluate alternative solutions which
include input from State Historical Society, Minne-
haha Creek Watershed, Minnesota Department of Natu-
ral Resources, etc.
3. Depending upon the input from the agencies above,
conduct a traffic analysis for each possible solu-
tion. (At this point, a traffic consultant would be
used.)
4. Develop a feasibility report for Council review
which would be available in Mid -1993.
The above items would need the assistance of structural and
traffic engineers. The consultant costs could range from
$5,000 to $15,000 depending upon level of review of alterna-
tive solutions. The funds for the consulting engineer would
be from appropriations to the capital plan as depicted in the
1992 budget for Browndale Bridge.
In summary, Staff will make a short presentation at the
Council meeting illustrating schedule and traffic data col-
lection map.
A.
oe4�
0
• ! ~�bRPOMt�v
ass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Agenda Item #
V • C
From:
FRED RICHARDS, MAYOR
Consent
Information Only
Date:
SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY
To Council
i
EDUCATION SERVICES
COMMITTEE
Action
Motion
E
Resolution
Ordinance
C
Discussion
Recommendation:
Consent of the Mayor's appointment of Jeannine M. Nayes as a member -at -large
to the Community Education Services Committee, for a one year term ending
6/30/93.
Info /Background:
With the concurrence of the Council, I intend to appoint Jeannine N. Nayes
to the Community Education Services Committee. A copy of her resume is
attached for your information.
JEANNINE M. NAPES
5724 Dale Avenue ` Edina, MN 55436
Home Phone: (612) 922 -6610 ' Work Phone: (612) 663 -3381
EDUCATION
University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska. Masters of Business Administration,
through Executive MBA Program (Aug. 1987)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota.
Majors:_ B.S. - Mathematics (Nov. 1977); Physical Education (Aug. 1977)
Cumulative GPA: 3.42, Basis 4.00 Scholars Program: NDSU
EXPERIENCE
Northwestern Bell /U S WEST Communications:
7/91 to Present: Manager - Strategic Planning. Responsible for project
management of. LBS Business Plan. Includes developing
communications plan for project, coordinating with various managers
through Vice President for acceptance and input, delivering of quality
product. Provide financial support for LBS business case teams.
3/91 to 7/91: Enhanced Leave of Absence for Child Care.
2/90 to 3/91: Finance Manager - MU Profitability. Replaced retiring manager
and resumed prior job to plan for 1991 Market Unit Profitability,
(formerly Transfer Pricing) implementation. Planned and
coordinated for interface with Network Unit Costs Project and video
training for all USWC employees.
9/89 to 2/90: Finance Work Simplification . Team. Interviewed three Financial
areas in. joint study with Arthur Anderson & Co. and recommended
simplification areas to Finance Vice Presidents. Prepared
documentation to track findings; supported Project. Director for
implementation planning and presentations.
8/89 to 9/89: Enhanced Leave of Absence for Child Care.
4/88 to 8/89: Project Manager - Transfer Pricing. Responsible for regional
implementation of transfer pricing, including mechanization
(TRANSFER) development, training (writing & delivery),
intracompany communications, conceptual planning, issues
resolution, budget negotiations, officer materials and regional team.
4/86 to 3/88 Finance Manager- Revenues. Responsible for both budget and
actual revenues at company level for Northwestern Bell. - Forecasted
trends, analyzed variances, coordinated special' reports and
interdepartmental contacts for budget work. . Responsible for CCI
contract negotiation and administration.
JEANNINE M. NAYES
11/83 to 3/86: Product Manager -RCCs. Responsible for pricing, marketing, rate
witnessing, tracking, and coordination of products and services
offered to Radio Common Carriers (paging, mobile, cellular mobile
carriers). Prepared tariff for business relationship and negotiated
contracts with RCCs.
9/81 to 11/83: Supervisor - Cost Studies. Coordinate and document studies on
basic Exchange and Access costs. Duties included research, data
verification, preparation of methodology, results analysis, and
presentations. Analyze and aid in preparing testimony for rate
proceedings.
4/80 to 9/81: Engineer - TIRKS. Responsible for all message toll circuits in North
Dakota, as to transmission, design, routing, order tracking and
coordination. Assisted in developing office conversion schedules for
cut -overs to electronic officers. y
11179 to 4/80: Toll Engineer. Prepared estimates, engineered equipment, ordered
materials, updated records, and verified completions for maintaining
toll routes in Western North Dakota area.
8/78 to 11/79: Management Assistant /Transmission Engineer. Tracked special
circuits terminating in power substations in North Dakota. Assured
adequate protection transformers on circuits and updated records.
Maintained records and coordinated FCC licenses for microwave
radio stations.
Minnesota Public Schools:
11177 to 6/78: Mathematics Teacher, Warroad, Minnesota School District. Taught
grades 7 and 8 mathematics students. Prepared materials for
teaching.
SPECIAL SKILLS AND TRAINING
Extensive Macintosh experience on various programs:
Database mgt, word processing, spreadsheets,project management, presentation software
Quality of Worklife Facilitator, 1985, 1986, 1987
Coalition Building for Women Facilitator, 1987
Image Makers Facilitator, 1984; 1985
Toastmasters International, 1982, 1983, 19849 1985, 1986
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
U S WEST Women (various offices over several years; Co- Chairperson of Programs on 1992
Regional Conference)
Edina Community Enrichment Council /Community Education (Chairperson- 1991 -92; 3 year
member)
Edina Newcomers Club (member since 1988)
o� e ` ch
O
lase
T0: Ken Rosland
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
From: Janet Chandler and the
Recyclinq & Solid Waste C
Date: September 8, 1992
Subject: Recycl i nq Contract 1993
Agenda Item #
x-L
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECONIMF14DATION
Accept the Woodlake proposal to provide city -wide recycling service with the following
terms:
-Three year contract
-Add mixed mail to the collection in May of 1993
- Include pickup of household batteries
- Special drop -off in spring for telephone books
* - Curbside placement of recyclables
-A proviso for profit sharing if the value of materials rises above the current level
- Year -end program review and option to change pickup point
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Council has received several reports recently on issues pertaining to the recycling
program. This report briefly reviews the following:
- Woodlake proposal of August 24
-Cost comparison chart
- Recycling Commission recommendations
-Staff comments
*Refer to page 3, staff comment
�'OF
2.
WOODLAKE PROPOSAL OF AUGUST 24
The proposal includes the following options:
#1. Continue the existing program
Single family $2.60 /unit /month .
Multi unit $2.00 /unit /month
#2. Continue existing program and add mixed mail in May of 1993
Single family $2.72 /unit /month
Multi unit $2.10 /unit /month
#3. Curbside program and add mixed mail in May of 1993
Single family $2.35 /unit /month
Multi unit $2.10 /unit /month
In addition, a drop -off container for phone books would be placed at the Recycling
Center in the spring to accommodate residents who.miss the earlier US West program.
Household batteries would also be collected providing that an agreement can be worked
out with Hennepin County to receive the batteries.
The City would also have the option to enter into an agreement for sharing of profits in
the event that the average value of recyclables exceeds the current rate of $7 per ton. In
the opionion of Woodlake district manager Kevin Tritz, the price of recyclables is not
very likely to increase, but nevertheless, this could be included in the contract.
Woodiake proposes a two or three year contract with incremental increases of $.13 per
unit the second year and $.11 per unit the third year. At the end of any year the City
could opt to change the collection point.
COST COMPARISON CHART
Option
Cost/ Month
Sin le Multi
Total
Annual
County
Funding
City Net
Cost
Utility/ Quarter
Single Multi
#1
$2.60
$2.00
$484,790
$297.381
$187,409
$3.42
$1.62
#2
52.72
$2.10
$504,980
$297,381
$207,599
$3.78
$1.92
#3
5235
52.10
5445,826
5297,381
$148,445
$2.67
51.92
Second Year
#1
$2.73
$2.13
$506,881
$297,381
$209,500
53.81
$2.01
#2
$2.85
$2.23
$527,071
$297,381
$229,690
54.17
$231
#3
$2.48
52.23
$467,917
$2979381
$170,536
$3.06
$231
Third Year
#1
52.84
$2.24
$5259573
$297,381
$228,192
54.14
52.34
#2
$2.96
$234
5545,764
$297,381
3248,383
54.50
$2.64
#3
52.59
S234
$486.610
$297,381
$189,229
$3.39
$2.64
A comparison of curbside pickup versus garage -side pickup shows the cost difference to
be $59,154 annually.
�w
3.
RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE COND41SSION RECOMMENDATIONS AND
STAFF CON04ENTS
The commission believes the marketing ability of a recycling hauler to be of primary
importance. Woodlake has responded to the uncertainties of the recycling markets by
securing several markets for the various recyclables, both in this area and outside
Minnesota.
Reliability of the hauler is also of major concern. Woodlake has proved to be very
reliable in servicing Edina's program; routes are completed on time; complaints are at a
minimum. Residents generally seem very well pleased with the service.
The success of Edina's recycling program can be illustrated by the statistic that shows
Edina residents recycle more pounds per person than residents in other cities. The
"down side" of this is that it takes more trucks to handle the recyclables, which in turn,
increases the per household pickup cost.
On the issue of the pickup point for recyclables, the commission voted unanimously for
curbside placement as a way to reduce the cost. 'On this point, the staff comment is
that a number of residents would probably oppose this change. We don't know how
many residents feel strongly on this issue, but simply wish to point out that there is a
segment of the community that shares this opinion.
On the related issue of utility billing, the commission and staff agree that this is a very
fair and reasonable way to cover the net recycling costs.
l
AGENDA ITEM VIII.A
REGIONAL B AST MEETINGS
FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS IN
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Metropolitan Council Chair Mary E Anderson invites you to her annual
regional breakfast meetings for local officials in Hennepin County. The
meetings provide an opportunity to talk about the regional issues the
Council is dealing with. They also are- a chance for you to tell us more
about the impact of regional issues in your part of the Metro Area.
Chair Anderson will discuss the Council's priorities. Included are our
New Ventures project to develop more effective ways to deliver
government services, and our proposed vision and goals for the region
in the year 2015. Council members are also interested in hearing what
you think the Council is doing right, what it's doing wrong and what it
should be doing in the future.. Meeting details follow:
HENNEPIN COUNTY (NORTH) HENNEPIN COUNTY (SOUTH)
WHEN: Wednesday, Sept. 23 WHEN: Tuesday, Sept. 29
7:30 -9 a.m. 7 :30 -9 a.m.
WHERE: Day's Inn Mpls. North WHERE: Boston Subway
1501 Freeway Blvd. 1019 Main St.
Brooklyn Center Hopkins
RSVP BY: Sept. 18
RSVP BY.- Sept. 25
The cost per meeting is $6, which includes breakfast, tax and gratuity.
TO RSVP, please call the Community Services Department at 291 -6447
Minnegasco
A Division of Arkla, Inc.
AGENDA ITEM IX.A
September 4, 1992
Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
4801 West 50th St
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Daehn:
I am writing to inform you that Minnegasco has filed a rate increase request with the
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) that would raise a typical residential heating
customer's bill by about $3.50 per month. This request, Minnegasco's first general rate
increase request in Minnesota since 1982, . would increase overall revenues by about 5.5
percent.
The MPUC has approved a 2.63 percent interim rate increase, effective September 1.
An official notice of this filing is enclosed. Please share this information with your Mayor
and City Council members at your earliest convenience.
There are four major factors affecting Minnegasco's need for a rate increase:
• The need to invest continually in the gas distribution system
• Costs associated with old manufactured gas plants
• The effects of inflation over several years
• Growth of conservation programs designed to help customers save energy and
money.
The rate increase will help us meet the significant increases in our costs of doing
business, and enable us to continue providing a safe, reliable supply of natural gas. Although
we have been able to improve productivity and manage expenses effectively over the past
several years, we're at a point where those efforts are no longer enough to offset rising
costs.
Even with this proposed increase in rates, Minnegasco's residential natural gas rates
will still be the lowest offered by the five largest natural gas utilities in Minnesota.
If you have any questions about this rate increase request, please don't hesitate to
contact me at (612)342 -4821.
Sincerely,
Kim Roden, Director
Local Government & Community Relations
201 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Notice to Counties and Municipalities
Under Minn. Stat. § 216B.16 Subd 1
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION - STATE OF MINNESOTA
In the Matter of the Application )
of Minnegasco, Minneapolis, )
Minnesota, for Authority to Change )
Its Schedule of Natural Gas Rates )
for Retail Customers Within the )
State of_ Minnesota )
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR RATE INCREASE
MPUC Docket No. G- 008/GR -92 -400
. .On July 2, 1992, Minnegasco, a division of Arkla, Inc., ( Minnegasco) filed
a request with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) for a
general rate increase of $24.8 million or 5.5 percent. In accordance with Minn.
Stat. § 216.16 Subd. 3 (1990), the Commission shall order an interim rate
schedule into effect no later than September 1, 1992. The Commission has
approved an interim rate increase of $11.8 million or 2.63 percent.
Below are examples of the effect of the proposed and interim increase on typical
bills. Individual changes may be higher or lower depending on actual natural gas
usage.
Rate class
Average
Average
Interim rates
Proposed
monthly usage
monthly bill:
rates
CCFs
current rates
Residential
108
$ 47.00
$ 48.20
$ 50.40
Commercial
561
$ 236.40
$ 242.60
$ 250.00
and
industrial
Small volume
5,878
$ 1,389.80
$ 1,426.40
$ 1,511.40
interruptible
Large volume
25,000
$10,357.00
$10,629.00
$10,677.00
firm
Large volume
100,000
$22,128.00
$22,710.00
$20,650.00
interruptible
The Commission will determine the amount of the final rate increase on or
before May 3, 1993. If the final approved rates are less than the interim rates,
the difference will be refunded to the customer, with interest.
The Department of Public Service will conduct an investigation of
Minnegasco's books and records. A public hearing will be scheduled by the MPUC.
Public notice of the hearing dates and locations will be published in local
newspapers in Minnegasco's Minnesota service areas.
(over)
The proposed rate schedules, and a comparison of present and proposed
rates, may be examined by the public during normal business hours at their
nearest Minnegasco office, or at the Department of Public Service, 790 American -
Center Building, 160 East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul, MN.
A public,hearing will be. scheduled by the Commission. Public notice of the
hearing dates and locations will be published in local newspapers in Minnegasco's
Minnesota service areas.
Persons who wish to intervene or testify in this case should contact the
Administrative Law Judge, Richard C. Luis, Office of Administrative Hearings, 100
Washington Square, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, MN 55401, 612 - 349 -2542.
o e� 71
ch
i Nov y
.b
;a86
• �N� �
aea
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
Agenda Item #I
X. B
From: John Wallin
Consent
❑
Finance Director
Information Only
❑
Date: September 4, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject' Hold Hearing on
'
0
To Council
Refunding and Pass
Resolutions
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
(1) Hold hearing on refunding General Obligation Tax
Increment 1988 and 1989 bonds, Golf and Recreation 1985, 1988
and 1989 bonds, Utility 1988 bonds and Improvement 1989 bonds
for a total savings of over $1,200,000.
(2) Pass resolution calling for the sale of the General
Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds and the various
refunding bonds.
Info/Background-
Attached is a form of resolution calling for the sale of the
General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds and various
refunding bonds. The recreational facility bonds are to
finance the purchase and construction of Normandale Golf
Course, the construction of the new nine holes at Braemar and
the recent pool renovation. The bond issues proposed to be
refunded are detailed in Appendix II on page 8 in the
attached recommendations. Under Federal tax law the City may
only refund these bonds one time and by proceeding with the
proposed advanced refunding, the City will be using its one
opportunity.
In the advance refundi.ngs of the City's bonds eligible for
refunding, the City would redeem all of the bonds maturing on
or after their call dates. This redemption provision was
clearly stated in the form of the Bonds, the Notice of Bond
Sale and the Official Statement prepared by the City for
distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds. This
redemption provision was taken into account by the purchaser
in determining what to bid for the Bonds.
�r
Recommendations
For
City of Edina, Minnesota
$3,975,000
General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds,
Series 1992A
$1798409000
General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding
Bonds, Series 1992B
$4,560,000
General Obligation Recreational Facility Refunding
Bonds, Series 1992C
$1,925,000
General Obligation Utility Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992D
$1,090,000
General Obligation Improvement Refunding
Bonds, Series 1992E
Study No. E1126E1 -11
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
September 2, 1992
S P R I N GST E D
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2825
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3368
(612) 333 -9177
Fax: (612) 333 -2363
Home Office
85 East Seventh Place
16655 West Bluemound Road
Suite 100
Suite 290
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2143
Brookfield, WI 53005 -5935
(612) 223 -3000
(414) 782 -8222
Fax: (612) 223 -3002
Fax: (414) 782 -2904
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
Overland Park, KS 66211 -1533
(913) 345 -8062
Fax: (913) 345 -1770
September 2, 1992 1800 K Street NW
Se
p Suite 831
Washington, DC 20006 -2200
(202) 466 -3344
Fax: (202) 223 -1362
Mayor Frederick S. Richards
Members, City Council
Mr. Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of:
$3,975,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A
$17,840,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B
$4,560,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds, Series 1992C
$1,925,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992D
$1,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992E
We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of the
above -named bonds in accordance with the attached Terms of Proposals. We will discuss
each issue separately and then items common to all issues.
General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A
The Series 1992A Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and
Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655. Proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance swimming
pool improvements, the construction of nine holes at Braemar Golf Course, and the acquisition
and renovation of Normandale Golf Course. Under the provisions of Minnesota Laws 1961,
Chapter 655, the City may issue general obligation bonds for recreational facilities if the net
revenues of its liquor,. golf course and ice arena funds from the preceding fiscal year are
greater than the maximum annual principal and interest on the new bond issue and all
outstanding recreational facility bonds. For fiscal year 1991, the net revenues of the liquor, golf
course and ice arena funds totaled $1,064,781. The maximum projected annual debt service
estimated for this issue and outstanding recreational facility debt is expected to be
approximately $968,024. This projected debt service figure does not take into consideration
potential decreases in the debt service requirements upon successful completion of a
refunding of the existing recreational facility bonds, which will be discussed later in these
recommendations.
City of Edina, Minnesota
September 2, 1992
The project costs and the sizing for the Series 1992A Bonds are as follows:
Normandale Golf Course $2,225,000
Braemar Nine Holes 700,000
Swimming Pool 650,000
Issuance Costs 27,775
Capitalized Interest (through 7 -1 -94) 322,040
Allowance for Underwriter's Discount 53,665
Subtotal $3,978,480
Less: Estimated Investment Earnings (3.480)
Total Series 1992A Bonds $3,975,000
While the City's taxing authority, as well as all net revenues of the liquor, golf course and ice
arena funds, are pledged for payment of the Series 1992A Bonds, it is anticipated that the
revenues generated by each of the three projects financed by this issue will support that
project's pro -rata share of debt service. The issue has been structured based on the
assumptions of City staff as to anticipated revenue streams of each project. If actual revenues
come in lower than the current estimates, the City may have to increase the fees required for
use of the new facilities to cover any shortfall between revenues and debt service requirements
if a tax levy is to be avoided.
Attached as Appendix I is the recommended maturity schedule for the Series 1992A Bonds.
The bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, and will mature January 1, 1996 through 2013.
This timing follows the payment schedule for existing recreational facility bonds. The principal
payments, shown in Column 3, have been delayed until 1996, and are fairly light in the first
several years, since Braemar and Normandale will not be completed and generating revenues
until mid -1994.
Capitalized interest has been included in the issue (Column 7) to cover the pro -rata share of
interest payments attributable to the Normandale and Braemar portions of the issue
(approximately 83.6% of the total project costs) through the July 1, 1994 interest date. We
understand revenues are currently being generated to cover the swimming pool portion of this
issue.
The total revenue required to cover the estimated debt service payments on this issue is shown
in Column 8 of Appendix I. These annual requirements are based on current rates in the bond
market (indicated in Column 4), which are subject to change between now and the time of sale.
Column 9 shows the existing debt requirements (prior to the proposed refunding) for the City's
recreational facility bonds issued in 1985, 1988 and 1989 and Column 10 totals the estimated
debt service on the new bonds and the current requirements of the old bonds. The revenues
generated each year by the City's recreational facilities will be used to cover the July 1
semiannual interest payment due in that same year and the subsequent January 1 payment of
principal and interest.
We recommend the bonds maturing on or after January 1, 2003 be callable on January 1,
2002, and any day thereafter, at a price of par and accrued interest. This call feature will permit
the prepayment of a portion of the issue in the future if market conditions or other
circumstances so warrant.
Page 2
City of Edina, Minnesota
September 2, 1992
The Refunding Bonds
Proceeds of the Series 1992B, 1992C, 1992D and 1992E Bonds will be used to advance refund
the callable maturities of seven of the City's outstanding bond issues. The refundings are
being conducted to achieve interest costs savings, which are expected to total approximately
$1.2 million for the combined issues, for a present value of approximately $800,000.
While the refunding method we recommend will be identical for all seven issues, four separate
series of bonds must be issued since four different sources of security are pledged for payment
of the various issues. We have combined into one refunding series, all those outstanding bond
issues which have a common payment source.
The refunding will be conducted by means of a "crossover" refunding. In a crossover
refunding, the proceeds of the refunding (new issue) bonds are placed in an escrow account
with a major bank and invested in government securities. These securities and their earnings
are structured to pay debt service on the new bonds through the call date of the refunded
bonds at which time the escrow account will crossover and pay the remaining principal on the
original issue by calling in all of those remaining bonds. The City will continue to pay debt
service on the original issue through the call date. Beginning with the first interest payment
due after the crossover date, the City will crossover and begin making debt service payments
on the new issue taking advantage of the lower interest rates.
A summary of the outstanding issues to be refunded and their respective estimated savings are
provided in Appendix II. The savings figures are based on current interest rates in the bond
market and are subject to fluctuation up or down between now and the time of sale. We will
continue to monitor the market over the next several weeks and if savings deteriorate to an
unacceptable level, the City may either cancel some or all of the refunding issues prior to the
sale date or reject the bids received on the date of sale.
As interest rates fluctuate up and down, the amount of money needed in the escrow accounts
for each of these issues fluctuates also. Therefore, we have included a provision in each issue
to permit the City to increase or decrease the principal amount in any of the maturities by the
amount stated in the Terms of Proposal for each issue. This will also allow for any variances in
the actual issuance costs, which will be paid by the escrow account, and the actual discount
taken by the underwriters, both of which may vary from the assumptions made in these
recommendations.
Attached as Appendices III through VI are debt service schedules for each of the new refunding
issues and breakdowns of the estimated annual savings for each issue. Each refunding issue
will be dated November 1, 1992 and principal payments on the new bonds will not commence
until after the crossover date, when the old bonds are refunded.
Bonds issued after the enactment of the 1986 Tax Reform Act are eligible for one advance
refunding. To provide the City with additional flexibility, each series of refunding bonds, with
the exception of the Series 1992D Bonds, is subject to early redemption at the option of the
City. (Please refer to the specific Terms of Proposal for each issue, which are attached.)
These bonds may be refunded on a "current" basis beginning 90 days prior to the initial call
date. Due to the short maturity length of the Series 1992D Bonds, a call feature has not been
included on that issue.
General Obligation Tax'lncrement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B
The Series 1992B Bonds will refund the General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds (tax- exempt)
issued in 1988 and 1989.
Page 3
City of Edina, Minnesota
September 2, 1992
The Series 1992B Bonds will be paid from tax increment income of the tax increment financing
districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The 1988 and 1989
bonds were originally issued to finance costs related to the development of Centennial Lakes.
Since this area has been slower to develop than originally projected, the new bonds have been
structured to provide for greater savings primarily in the .years 1999 -2001.
General Obligation Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds, Series 1992C
The Series 1992C Bonds will refund the 1985 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds and the
1988 and 1989 issues of General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds.
The Series 1992C Bonds will be secured by net revenues of the City's liquor, golf course and
ice arena funds, as are the Series 1992A Bonds. The 1985, 1988 and 1989 bonds were
originally issued to finance golf facility and ice arena improvements. Net revenues generated
by those projects are expected to continue to be used to cover debt service payments on the
Series 1992C Bonds after the crossover date. The refunding has been structured to provide for
even annual savings over the life of the issue.
General Obligation Utili!y Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992D
The Series 1992D Bonds will refund the City's 1988 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds,
which financed improvements to the City's water and storm sewer systems. Net revenues of
the City's utilities fund will be pledged for payment of the Series 1992D Bonds, as they are for
the 1988 Bonds. This refunding has also been structured to provide for even annual savings.
General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992E
The Series 1992E Bonds will be secured by special assessments originally filed for the 1989
Improvement Bonds which are being refunded. The 1989 Improvement Bonds financed the
public improvements for the Centennial Lakes Redevelopment Project. The City will continue
to collect the assessments, which will be used for payment of the Series 1992E Bonds
subsequent to the crossover date. Again, even annual savings are provided for in the structure
of the refunding bonds.
Common To All Issues
We recommend that these issues be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical
distribution of bonds made to the public. The bonds will be issued in fully registered form and
one bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the bonds maturing in each year for
each issue series, will be registered in the name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest
Securities Trust Company ( "MSTC "), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of
the bonds. Individual purchases of the bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000
or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and
records of MSTCand its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or
its nominee as registered owner of the bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the bonds, will be
required to deposit the bonds with MSTC.
Use of the book entry system eliminates all costs to the City for bond printing and bond
registration. We estimate for these issues, the City will save approximately $18,000 by utilizing
book entry bonds. This system has become widely accepted in the bond market for larger
issues and we don't believe it will deter the marketing of the City's issues.
Page 4
City of Edina, Minnesota
September 2, 1992
Rating applications will be made to Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's for these
issues. We will provide the rating agencies with the necessary data upon which they will make
their rating analysis. The cost of the rating fees has been pro -rated in the issuance costs for
each individual issue.
These issues are subject to federal arbitrage regulations. The 1986 Tax Reform Act and the
1989 amendments to the Act introduced and modified rebating arbitrage profits to the Treasury.
Generally speaking, all arbitrage profits (the yield difference between the earnings on the
investments and the yield on the obligations) must be rebated to the Treasury. There are some
exemptions to this rebate requirement which include:
(i) A small issuer exemption if the obligations are for governmental purposes and the
issuer reasonably expects to issue not more than $5,000,000 tax- exempt obligations
during the calendar year.
(ii) A six -month exemption if all of the proceeds are expended within six months of
issuance.
(iii) A two -year expenditure test if at least 75% of the proceeds of the issue are used for
construction and if 10% is expended within six months, 45% within 12 months, 75%
within 18 months and 100% spent within two years. If it is reasonably required that a
retainage be maintained to enforce the completion of a contract, up to 5% of the
proceeds may be retained for an additional 12 months. Net proceeds subject to these
expenditure tests include investment earnings on the original proceeds.
The expenditure tests of items (ii) and (iii) above are an absolute requirement, not reasonable
expectations. If the City can meet either of these expenditure requirements for its Series 1992A
Bonds, that issue will be exempt from arbitrage rebate.
The four series of refunding issues qualify for exemption from arbitrage reporting and rebate
requirements if all of the following requirements can be met: (i) the advance refunding issue
does not exceed $5,000,000, (ii) the refunded issue was itself exempted from rebate when
issued, or if issued prior to 1986 it was issued in a year when the issuer did not issue more
than $5,000,000 of governmental obligations, (iii) the average maturity date of the refunding
issue is not later than the average maturity date of the bonds to be refunded, and (iv) no
refunding bond has a maturity date later than 30 years after the date the original bond was
issued. All four refunding issues fail to qualify since the City issued over $5,000,000 in the
years the refunded bonds were issued (item ii). However, the City will not owe any rebate from
investments of bond proceeds because the proceeds will be invested at a yield less than the
new refunding bond yield, thus creating no arbitrage. Another potential source of rebate would
stem from the creation of the debt service funds to pay debt service on the new issues. The
City will be exempt from rebate from this source so long as it maintains a "bona fide" debt
service fund for each issue. A bona fide debt service fund requires that no more than 13
months of debt service money be accumulated.
Prior to the adoption of the Tax Reform Act, financial institutions were generally permitted to
deduct 80% of their interest expense allocable to tax- exempt obligations. Under the Act,
however, financial institutions are generally not entitled to such a deduction for tax- exempt
obligations purchased after August 7, 1986. There is an exemption to this for issuers of less
than $10,000,000 of tax- exempt bonds or notes during the calendar year. As the City is issuing
more than $10,000,000 of tax- exempt obligations in 1992, these bonds will not be bank
qualified. The interest rates used in our estimates are based on rates for non -bank qualified
issues.
Page 5
City of Edina, Minnesota
September 2, 1992
The 1991 Legislature amended bond sale procedures to permit the non - public issuance of
obligations if the issuer retains an independent financial advisor. Springsted Incorporated
remains a proponent of competitive bidding but sees some advantages to the new legislation.
We recommend a competitive negotiated sale where all bidders reasonably expected to
compete for an issue are notified of the pending sale, and competitive bids are received but no
legal advertisement is published. The issuer benefits from eliminating the publication costs and
any risk of having an issue delayed due to the time required for publication or the inadvertent
failure of a legal notice to be published. In our ever changing industry published notices are no
longer a critical source of information for bidders. Other than for publication, you should see
no change in your issuing procedures or in the bidding results.
Springsted Incorporated has joined with Capital Guaranty Insurance Company, a municipal
bond insurer, to offer a surety bond service to underwriters in lieu of putting up a good faith
check in order to bid on the bonds. The program is called "Sure -Bid" and we have allowed for
its use in the Terms of Proposal attached to these recommendations. We believe that the use
of this bidding option will help garner more bids for the bond sales, since it has the potential to
make it easier for an underwriter to bid. There is no cost to the City for this service, and
Springsted Incorporated does not have a financial interest in the use of Sure -Bid.
For underwriting firms which have been approved and have entered into a reimbursement
agreement with Capital Guaranty and have elected to use Sure -Bid instead of physically
delivering a good faith check with their bid, Capital Guaranty will put up a surety bond,
guaranteeing the amount of the good faith check for each issue to the City if the purchaser
does not deliver such check to Springsted by 3:30 P.M. the day after the sales. We believe that
we will not have to invoke the surety bond on your behalf and will forward the good faith
checks from the purchasers as soon as we receive them.
We recommend these bonds be offered for sale on Monday, October 5, 1992, with proposals
received at the offices of Springsted Incorporated at 11:00 A.M. During the remainder of the
day, proposals will be verified, checked for accuracy, and the necessary computer calculations
will be made in order to determine the benefits of the refunding issues. We will then present
the bids and our recommendations to the Council at its regular meeting at 7:00 P.M. that
evening.
Respectfully submitted,
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
mmr
Page 6
m
C'
City of Edina, Minnesota
Project Costs
$3,575,000
Issuance Costs
27,775
Discount
Prepared
01- Sep -92
G.O. Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A
Subtotal
$3,978,480
Less: Invest. Earnings
3 480
Total Bond Issue
By SPRINGSTED
Incorporated
(Combined Projects)
Dated: 11-1-1992
Mature: 1- t
First Interest: 7- 1 -1993
Total
Capital-
Net
Existing
Total
Year of Year of
Principal
Ized
Revenue
Recreation
Debt
Revenue Mat.
Principal
Rates
Interest
& Interest
Interest
Required
Debt
Service
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(6)
(9)
(10)
1992 1993
0
0.00%
38,522
38,522
32,200
6,322
586,190
592,512
1993 1994
0
0.00%
231,130
231,130
193,225
37,905
572,186
610,091
1994 1995
0
0.00%
231,130
231,130
96,615
134,515
562,768
697,283
1995 1996
45,000
4.25%
231,130
276,130
0
276,130
552,796
828,926
1996 1997
70,000
4.50%
229,217
299,217
0
299,217
542,290
841,507
1997 1998
105,000
4.75%
226,067
331,067
0
331,067
583,969
915,036
1998 1999
105,000
5.00%
221,079
326,079
0
326,079
567,730
893,809
1999 2000
130,000
5.25%
215,829
345,829
0
345,829
550,842
896,671
2000 2001
135,000
5.4096
209,004
344,004
0
344,004
539,545
883,549
2001 2002
170,000
5.55%
201 ,714
371,714
0
371 ,714
547,998
919,712
2002 2003
200,000
5.60%
192,279
392,279
0
392,279
534,878
927,157
2003 2004
235,000
5.75%
181,079
416,079
0
416,079
544,979
961,058
2004 2005
250,000
5.80%
167,566
417,566
0
417,566
547,604
965,170
2005 2006
260,000
5.85%
153,066
413,066
0
413,066
552,760
965,826
2006 2007
275,000
5.90%
137,856
412,856
0
412,856
535,999
948,855
2007 2008
285,000
6.0096
121,631
406,631
0
406,631
561,393
968,024
2008 2009
305,000
6.05%
104,531
409,531
0
409,531
538,981
948,512
2009 2010
320,000
6.10%
86,078
406,078
0
406,078
0
406,078
2010 2011
340,000
6.1096
66,558
406,558
0
406,558
0
406,558
2011 2012
360,000
6.15%
45,818
405,818
0
405,818
0
405,818
2012 2013
385,000
6.15%
23,678
408,678
0
408,678
0
408,678
TOTALS:
3,975,000
3,314,962
7,289,962
322,040
6,967,922
9,422,908
16,390,830
Bond Years:
55,822.50
Annual Interest:
3,314,962
Avg. Maturity:
14.04
Plus Discount:
53,665
Avg. Annual Rate:
5.938%
Net Interest:
3,368,627
T.I.C. Rate:
6.055%
N.I.C. Rate:
6.035%
Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant alterations of this schedule.
The actual underwriter's discount bid may also vary.
Composition of Issue:
Project Costs
$3,575,000
Issuance Costs
27,775
Discount
53,665
Capitalized Interest
322,040
Subtotal
$3,978,480
Less: Invest. Earnings
3 480
Total Bond Issue
53.975.000
19
m
Z
O
X
City of Edina, Minnesota
Summary of Proposed Refundings
NOTES.
(1) Savings 13gues are dosed on curent k4west rates and are sthAO to dwWo
(2) Projected savbgs are net otap r sOr ofbsumve.
ID
CID
m
0)
a
V
10
M
z
v
Estimated Savings
Maturities
Total Amount
Present Value
To Be
of Refiaded
Crossover
Net
Present As % of Refunded
issue
issues Refunded
Refunded
Princoal
Date
Savings
Value Savings Interest
G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds,
G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988
1999 - 2009
$9,425,000
2 -1 -98
$482,490 $317,415 10.59%
Series 19928
G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989
1999 -2009
$7,800,000
2 -1 -98
$417,925 $273,880 10.97%
G.O. Recrestonal Faility Rahm Ing Bonds,
G.O. Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
1997- 2000
$550,000
1 -1 -96
$33,188 $25,378 26.91%
Series 19920
G.O. Recreafbrd Facility Bonds, Series 1988
1999 - 2009
$2,295,000
1 -1 -98
$135,715 $75,385 10.43)6
G.O. Rearsalional Facility Bonds, Series 1989
1999 -2009
$1,560,000
1 -1 -98
$93,685 $51,755 11.5636
G.O. UdIity Revenue Refunding Bonds,
G.O. Utllity Revenue Bonds, Series 1988
1995 -1999
$1,865,000
2 -1 -94
$53,875 $45,860 13.67%
Series 1992D
G.O. Improvement RefLa ing Bodds,
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1989 -
1996 -2001
$1,045,000
2 -1 -95
W,780 $18,745 9.17%
Series 1992E
TOTAL
$24,540,000
$1,239,058 $808,418
NOTES.
(1) Savings 13gues are dosed on curent k4west rates and are sthAO to dwWo
(2) Projected savbgs are net otap r sOr ofbsumve.
ID
CID
m
0)
a
V
10
M
z
v
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, 1992
Date Principal Rate
8/
1/1993
516,792.50
2/
1/1994
516,792.50
516,792.50
8/
1/1994
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
2/
1/1995
516,792.50
8/
1/1995
516,792.50
516,792.50
2/
1/1996
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
8/
1/1996
516,792.50
2/
1/1997
516,792.50
516,792.50
8/
1/1997
1,061,792.50
1,578,585.00
2/
1/1998
503,167.50
8/
1/1998
484,792.50
484,792.50
2/
1/1999
545,000
5.000
8/
1/1999
464,272.50
2/
1/2000
700,000
5.250
8/
1/2000
1,698,053.75
2,131,107.50
2/
1/2001
760,000
5.400
8/
1/2001
357,096.25
357,096.25
2/
1/2002
1,125,000
5.550
8/
1/2002
314,466.25
2/
1/2003
1,265,000
5.600
8/
1/2003
2,781,642.50
3,048,285.00
2/
1/2004
1,410,000
5.750
8/
1/2004
99,750.00
99,750.00
2/
1/2005
1,470,000
5.800
8/
1/2005
2/
1/2006
1,635,000
5.850
8/
1/2006
2/
1/2007
2,515,000
5.900
8/
1/2007
2/
1/2008
3,090,000
6.000
8/
1/2008
2/
1/2009
3,325,000
6.000
TOTALS $17,840,000
APPENDIX III
Series 1992B Bonds
Prepared September 2, 1992
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Bond Date: 11/ 1/1992
Sale Date: 9/ 8/1992
Issue Size: $17,840,000
Annual
Interest Total Payment
775,193.62
775,193.62
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,291,986.12
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,033,585.00
516,792.50
516,792.50
516,792.50
1,061,792.50
1,578,585.00
503,167.50
503,167.50
503,167.50
1,203,167.50
1,706,335.00
484,792.50
484,792.50
484,792.50
1,244,792.50
1,729,585.00
464,272.50,
464,272.50
464,272.50
1,589,272.50
2,053,545.00
433,053.75
433,053.75
433,053.75
1,698,053.75
2,131,107.50
397,633.75
397,633.75
397,633.75
1,807,633.75
2,205,267.50
357,096.25
357,096.25
357,096.25
1,827,096.25
2,184,192.50
314,466.25
314,466.25
314,466.25
1,949,466.25
2,263,932.50
266,642.50
266,642.50
266,642.50
2,781,642.50
3,048,285.00
192,450.00
192,450.00
192,450.00
3,282,450.00
3,474,900.00
99,750.00
99,750.00
99,750.00
3,424,750.00
3,524,500.00
$13,486,561.12 $31,326,561.12 $31,326,561.12
Bond Years: 230,650.0000
Average Maturity: 12.93
Average Rate: 5.847%
NIC Rate: 5.847%
Interest rounded on individual $5,000 denominations
Page 9
Series 1992B Bonds
(Savings for 1988 Refundng)
Edina, Minnesota Prepared: 09/02/92
. Refunding Bonds, Series 1992 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
ual Savings Analysis
Totals
Non - Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Savings
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
or (Loss)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
02/01/93
363,506.25
363,506.25
363,506.25
08/01/93
02/03/94
727,012.50
727,012.50
727,012.50
08/01/94
02/01/95
977,012.50
977,012.50
977,012.50
08/01/95
02/01/96
786,012.50
786,012.50
.786,012.50
08/01/96
02/01/97
881,137.50
881,137.50
881,137.50
08/01/97
02/01/98
944,587.50
944,587.50
944,587.50
08/01/98
02/01/99
860,420.00
,860,420.00
1,002,837.50
142,417.50
08/01/99
02/01/2000
935,670.00
935,670.00
1,080,737.50
145,067.50
08/01/2000
02/01/2001
955,457.50
955,457.50
1,101,412.50
145,955.00
' -.01/2001
J1/2002
1,112,507.50
1,112,507.50
1,118,162.50
5,655.00
Ots /01/2002
02/01/2003
1,173,930.00.
1,173,930.00
1,181,150.00
7,220.00
08/01/2003
. 02/01/2004
1,209,730.00
1,209,730.00
1,211,775.00
2,045.00
08/01/2004
02/01/2005
1,205,167.50
1,205,167.50
1,211,725.00
6,557.50
08/01/2005
02/01/2006
1,227,897.50
1,227,897.50
1,232,725.00
4,827.50
08/01/2006
02/01/2007
1,666,125.00
1,666,125.00
1,672,912.50
6,787.50
08/01/2007
02/01/2008
1,895,000.00
1,895,000.00
1,901,850.00
6,850.00
08/01/2008
02/01/2009
1,923,900.00
1,923,900.00
1,931,400.00
7,500.00
Totals
4,679,268.75
14,165,805.00
18,845,073.75 19,325,956.25 480,882.50
Present
Value Rate...:
5.82904%
Excess Proceeds......: 1,605.57
Present
Value Savings:
317,418.35
Funds to Sinking Fund:
% of
P.V. Ref. Int:
10.59%
Total Net Savings....: 482,488.07
Page 10
Series 1992B Bonds
(Savings for 1989 Refunding)
Edina, Minnesota Prepared: 09/02/92
G ^. Refunding Bonds, Series 1992 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
ial Savings Analysis
Totals
Non- Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Savings
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
or (Loss)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
02/01/93
303,918.75
303,918.75
303,918.75
08/01/93
02/01/94
607,837.50
607,837.50
607,837.50
08/01/94
02/01/95
832,837.50
832,837.50
832,837.50
08/01/95
02/01/96
667,537.50
667,537.50
667,537.50
08/01/96
02/01/97
712,362.50
712,362.50
712,362.50
08/01/97
02/01/98
778,737.50
778,737.50
778,737.50
08/01/98
02/01/99
718,165.00
718,165.00
839,837.50
121,672.50
08/01/99
02/01/2000
770,665.00
770,665.00
895,587.50
124,922.50
08/01/2000
02/01/2001
774,127.50
774,127.50
895,912.50
121,785.00
0" ")1/2001
.1/2002
941,037.50
941,037.50
944,287.50
3,250.00
L_. j1/2002
02/01/2003
957,177.50
957,177.50
962,112.50
4,935.00
08/01/2003
02/01/2004
995,537.50
995,537.50
1,001,112.50
5,575.00
08/01/2004
02/01/2005
979,025.00
979,025.00
984,425.00
5,400.00
08/01/2005
02/01/2006
1,036,035.00
1,036,035.00
1,040,925.00
4,890.00
08/01/2006
02/01/2007
1,382,160.00
1,382,160.00
1,390,175.00
8,015.00
08/01/2007
02/01/2008
1,579,900.00
1,579,900.00
1,584,875.00
4,975.00
08/01/2008
02/01/2009
1,600,600.00
1,600,600.00
1,609,500.00
8,900.00
Totals
3,903,231.25
11,734,430.00
15,637,661.25 16,051,981.25 414,320.00
Present
Value Rate...:
5.82904%
Excess Proceeds......: 3,006.03
Present
Value Savings:
273,881.98
Funds to Sinking Fund:
A of
P.V. Ref. Int:
10.97%
Total Net Savings....: 417,326.03
Page 11
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Recreational Refunding Bonds, 1992
APPENDIX IV
Series 1992C Bonds
Prepared September 2, 1992
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Bond Years: 51,575.0000
Average Maturity: 11.31
Average Rate: 5.744%
NIC Rate: 5.744%
Interest rounded on individual $5,000 denominations
Page 12
Bond Date:
11/ 1/1992
Sale Date:
9/ 8/1992
Issue Size:
$4,560,000
Annual
Date
Principal
Rate Interest
Total
Payment
7/
1/1993
171,260.61
171,260.61
1/
1/1994
128,445.00
128,445.00
299,705.61
7/
1/1994
128,445.00
128,445.00
1/
1/1995
128,445.00
128,445.00
256,890.00
7/
1/1995
128,445.00
128,445.00
1/
1/1996
128,445.00
128,445.00
256,890.00
7/
1/1996
128,445.00
128,445.00.
1/
1/1997
110,000
4.500 128,445.00
238,445.00
366,890.00
7/
1/1997
125,970.00
125,970.00
1/
1/1998
160,000
4.750 125,970.00
285,970.00
411,940.00
7/
1/1998
122,170.00
122,170.00
1/
1/1999
310,000
5.000 122,170.00
432,170.00
554,340.00
7/
1/1999
114,420.00
114,420.00
1/
1/2000
300,000
5.250 114,420.00
414,420.00
528,840.00
7/
1/2000
106,545.00
106,545.00
1/
1/2001
315,000
5.400 106,545.00
421,545.00
528,090.00
7/
1/2001
98,040.00
98,040.00
1/
1/2002
345,000
5.550 98,040.00
443,040.00
541,080.00
7/
1/2002
88,466.25
88,466.25
1/
1/2003
350,000.-
5.600 88,466.25
438,466.25
526,932.50
7/
1/2003
78,666.25
78,666.25
1/
1/2004
380,000
5.750 78,666.25
458,666.25
537,332.50
7/
1/2004
67,741.25
67,741.25
1/
1/2005
410,000
5.800 67,741.25
477,741.25
545,482.50
7/
1/2005
55,851.25
55,851.25
1/
1/2006
435,000
5.850 55,851.25
490,851.25
546,702.50
7/
1/2006
43,127.50
43,127.50
1/
1/2007
445,000
5.900 43,127.50
488,127.50
531,255.00
7/
1/2007
30,000.00
30,000.00
1/
1/2008
495,000
6.000 30,000.00
525,000.00
555,000.00
7/
1/2008
15,150.00
15,150.00
1/
1/2009
505,000
6.000 15,150.00
520,150.00
535,300.00
TOTALS
$4,560,000
$2,962,670.61
$7,522,670.61
$7,522,670.61
Bond Years: 51,575.0000
Average Maturity: 11.31
Average Rate: 5.744%
NIC Rate: 5.744%
Interest rounded on individual $5,000 denominations
Page 12
City of Edina, Minnesota
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A
sal Savings Analysis
Schedule E
Series 1992C Bonds
(Savings for 1985 Refunding)
Prepared: 08/26/92
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Totals
Non - Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Savings
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
or (Loss)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
01/01/93
139,150.00
139,150.00
139,150.00
07/01/93
01/01/94
170,700.00
170,700.00
170,700.00
07/01/94
01/01/95
162,900.00
162,900.00
162,900.00
07/01/95
01/01/96
154,900.00
154,900.00
154,900.00
07/01/96
01/01/97
137,912.50
137,912.50
146,800.00
8,887.50
07/01/97
01/01/98
182,962.50
182,962.50
188,550.00
5,587.50
07/01/98
01/01/99
170,362.50
170,362.50
175,950.00
5,587.50
07/01/99
01/01/2000
152,612.50
152,612.50
163,050.00
10,437.50
Totals
627,650.00
643,850.00
1,271,500.00 1,302,000.00 30,500.00
Present
Value Rate...:
5.71643%
Excess Proceeds......: 2,687.77
sent
Value Savings:
25,377.62
26.91%
Funds to Sinking Fund:
Total Net Savings....: 33,187.77
It of
P.V. Ref. Int:
Page 13
E14ina, Minnesota
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992
.k .sal Savings Analysis
Series 1992C Bonds
(Savings for 1988 Refunding)
Prepared: 08/26/92
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Totals
1,087,100.00
Schedule E
4,473,270.00 4,608,187.50
Present
Non - Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
01/01/93
112,350.00
112,350.00
112,350.00
07/01/93
01/01/94
198,150.00
198,150.00
198,150.00
07/01/94
01/01/95
196,575.00
196,575.00
196,575.00
07/01/95
01/01/96
194,975.00
194,975.00
194,975.00
07/01/96
01/01/97
193,350.00
193,350.00
193,350.00
07/01/97
01/01/98
191,700.00
191,700.00
191,700.00
07/01/98
01/01/99
177,337.50
177,337.'50
190,025.00
07/01/99
01/01/2000
175,337.50
175,337.50
188,325.00
07/01/2000
07/01/2001
323,237.50
323,237.50
336,600.00
`1/2001
j1/2002
337,977.50
337,977.50
349,350.00
07/01/2002
01/01/2003
326,045.00
326,045.00
335,250.00
07/01/2003
01/01/2004
334,005.00
334,005.00
346,050.00
07/01/2004
01/01/2005
345,492.50
345,492.50
354,962.50
07/01/2005
01/01/2006
345,412.50
345,412.50
356,962.50
07/01/2006
01/01/2007
329,325.00
329,325.00
342,387.50
07/01/2007
01/01/2008
358,100.00
358,100.00'
372,450.00
07/01/2008
01/01/2009
333,900.00
333,900.00
348,725.00
Totals
1,087,100.00
3,386,170.00
4,473,270.00 4,608,187.50
Present
Value Rate...:
5.71643%
Excess Proceeds......:
" aent
Value Savings:
75,385.77
Funds to Sinking Fund:
t of
P.V. Ref. Int:
10.43%
Total Net Savings....:
Savings
or (Loss)
(6)
12,687.50
12,987.50
13,362.50
11,372.50
9,205.00
12,045.00
9,470.00
11,550.00
13,062.50
14,350.00
14,825.00
134,917.50
797.55
135,715.05
Page 14
Totals 1,198,331.25 2,221,210.00
Present Value Rate...: 5.71643%
ent Value Savings: 51,758.35
Ate$ of P.V. Ref. Int: 11.56%
3,419,541.25 3,512,713.75 93,172.50.
Excess Proceeds......: 513.02
Funds to Sinking Fund:
Total Net Savings..... 93,685.52
Page 15
Series 1992C Bonds
(Savings for 1989 Refunding)
EOina, Minnesota
Prepared: 1
08/26/92
Refunding
Bonds, Series
1992
By SPRINGSTED
Incorporated
�. lal Savings
Analysis
Schedule
E
Non - Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Savings
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
or (Loss)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
01/01/93
142,563.75
142,563.75
142,563.75
07/01/93
01/01/94
210,402.50
210,402.50
210,402.50
07/01/94
01/01/95
210,642.50
210,642450
210,642.50
07/01/95
01/01/96
210,542.50
210,542.50
210,542.50
07/01/96
01/01/97
210,022.50
210,022.50
210,022.50
07/01/97
01/01/98
214,157.50
214,157.50
214,157.50
07/01/98
01/01/99
206,640.00
206,640.00
212,555.00
5,915.00
07/01/99
01/01/2000
200,890.00
200,890.00
210,555.00
9,665.00
07/01/2000
03/01/2001
204,852.50
204,852.50
213,152.50
8,300.00
' 1/2001
1/2002
203,102.50
203,102.50
209,987.50
6,885.00
07/01/2002
01/01/2003
200,887.50
200,887.50
211,407.50
10,520.00
07/01/2003
01/01/2004
203,327.50
203,327.50
212,047.50
8,720.00
07/01/2004
01/01/2005
199,990.00
199,990.00
206,897.50
6,907.50
07/01/2005
01/01/2006
201,290.00
201,290.00
211,385.00
10,095.00
07/01/2006
01/01/2007
201,930.00
201,930.00
209,785.00
7,855.00
07/01/2007
01/01/2008
196,900.00
196,900.00
207,375.00
10,475.00
07/01/2008
01/01/2009
201,400.00
201,400.00
209,235.00
7,835.00
Totals 1,198,331.25 2,221,210.00
Present Value Rate...: 5.71643%
ent Value Savings: 51,758.35
Ate$ of P.V. Ref. Int: 11.56%
3,419,541.25 3,512,713.75 93,172.50.
Excess Proceeds......: 513.02
Funds to Sinking Fund:
Total Net Savings..... 93,685.52
Page 15
F''na, Minnesota
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992
k, _.ending Debt Service
APPENDIX V
Series 1992D Bonds
Prepared: 09/02/92
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Date Principal Rate Interest Semi- Annual
08/01/93
65,435.63
65,435.63 *
02/01/94
43,623.75
43,623.75 *
08/01/94
43,623.75
43,623.75
02/01/95
345,000.00
4.050%
43,623.75
388,623.75
08/01/95
36,637.50
36,637.50
02/01/96
370,000.00
4.250%
36,637.50
406,637.50
08/01/96
28,775.00
28,775.00
02/01/97
390,000.00
4.500%
28,775.00
418,775.00
08/01/97
20,000.00
20,000.00
02/01/98
400,000.00
4.750%
20,000.00
420,000.00
08/01/98
10,500.00
10,500.00
02/01/99
420,000.00
5.000%
10,500.00
430,500.00
Totals
Bond Years:
Mat..:
L.......:
1,925,000.00
8,361.25
4.344
4.826%
388,131.88
* Paid by escrow.
All other payments
made by the issuer.
2,313,13 .1.88
Bond Date.:
Delivery..:
Bond Yield:
Annual
109,059.38
432,247.50
443,275.00
447,550.00
440,000.00
441,000.00
2,313,131.88
11/01/92
11/10/92
4.62378%
Page 16
Edina, Minnesota
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992
..tal Savings Analysis
Series 1992D Bonds
Prepared: 09/02/92
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Non- Refunded Refunding Total New Existing
Date Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service
(1)
(2) (3).
(4)
(5)
02/01/93
380,422.50
380,422.50
380,422.50
08/01/93
Value Savings:
45,859.44
Funds to Sinking Fund:
02/01/94
442,245.00
442,245.00
442,245.00
08/01/94
02/01/95
432,247.50
432,247.50
443,345.00
08/01/95
02/01/96
443,275.00
443,275.00
452,865.00
08/01/96
02/01/97
447,550.00
447,550.00
455,115.00
08/01/97
02/01/98
440,000.00
440,000.00
450,365.00
08/01/98
02/01/99
441,000.00
441,000.00
453,900.00
Savings
or (Loss)
(6)
11,097.50
9,590.00
7,565.00
10,365.00
12,900.00
Totals
822,667.50
2,204,072.50
3,026,740.00 3,078,257.50 51,517.50
Present
Value Rate...:
4.62378%
Excess Proceeds......: 2,359.39
Present
Value Savings:
45,859.44
Funds to Sinking Fund:
% of
P.V. Ref. Int:
13.67%
Total Net Savings....: 53,876.89
Page 17
APPENDIX VI
Series 1992E Bonds
Edina, Minnesota Prepared: 08/26/92
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
1, ending Debt Service
Date Principal Rate Interest Semi- Annual Annual
08/01/93
39,613.13
39,613.13 *
02/01/94
26,408.75
26,408.75 *
08/01/94
26,408.75
26,408.75 *
02/01/95
26,408.75
26,408.75 *
08/01/95
26,408.75
26,408.75
02/01/96
190,000.00
4.250%
26,408.75
216,408.75
08/01/96
22,371.25
22,371.25
02/01/97
185,000.00
4.500%
22,371.25
207,371.25
08/01/97
18,208.75
18,208.75
02/01/98
185,000.00
4.750%
18,208.75
203,208.75
08/01/98
13,815.00
13,815.00
02/01/99
180,000.00
5.000%
13,815.00
193,815.00
08/01/99
9,315.00
9,315.00
02/01/2000
180,000.00
5.250%
9,315.00
189,315.00
08/01/2000
4,590.00
4,590.00
02/01/2001
170,000.00
5.400%
4,590.00
174,590.00
Totals
Bond Years:
Avg. Mat..:
7 .
1,090,000.00
6,207.50
5.695
5.141%
308,256.88
* Paid by escrow.
All other payments
made by the issuer.
G
1,398,256.88
Bond:Date.:
Delivery..:
Bond Yield:
66,021.88
52,817.50
242,817.50
229,742.50
221,417.50
207,630.00
198,630.00
179,180.00
1,398,256.88
11/01/92
11/10/92
4.94710%
Page 18
Vi_na, Minnesota
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992
r- .sal Savings Analysis
Series 1992E Bonds
Prepared: 08/26/92
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Totals
Non - Refunded
Refunding
Total New
Existing
Savings
Date
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
Debt Service
or (Loss)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
02/01/93
234,630.00
234,630.00
234,630.00
08/01/93
02/01/94
277,110.00
277,110.00
277,110.00
08/01/94
02/01/95
259,870.00
259,870.00
259,870.00
08/01/95
02/01/96
242,817.50
242,817.50
247,970.00
5,152.50
08/01/96
02/01/97
229,742.50
229,742.50
235,895.00
6,152.50
08/01/97
02/01/98
221,417.50
221,417.50
223,820.00
2,402.50
08/01/98
02/01/99
207,630.00
207,630.'00
211,657.50
4,027.50
08/01/99
02/01/2000
198,630.00
198,630.00
199,407.50
777.50
08/01/2000
02/01/2001
179,180.00
179,180.00
182,070.00
2,890.00
Totals
771,610.00
1,279,417.50
2,051,027.50 2,072,430.00 21,402.50
Present
Value Rate...:
4.94710%
Excess Proceeds......: 1,376.71
Present
Value Savings:
18,745.26
Funds to Sinking Fund:
% of
P.V. Ref. Int:
9.17%
Total Net Savings....: 22,779.21
Page 19
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$3,975,000
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS,
SERIES 1992A
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Manager or his designee on Monday,
October 5, 1992, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85
East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and
tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M.,
Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 1993.
Interest will be
computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature January 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
1996 $ 45,000 2001 $135,000 2006 $260,000
2010 $320,000
1997 $ 70,000 2002 $170,000 2007 $275,000
2011 $340,000
1998 $105,000 2003 $200,000 2008 $285,000
2012 $360,000
1999 $105,000 2004 $235,000 2009 $305,000
2013 $385,000
2000 $130,000 2005 $250,000
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company
( "MSTC "), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or its nominee as
registered owner -of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on January 1, 2002, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after January 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
Page 20
called for redemption, the City will notify MSTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. MSTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity
to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. The City may elect on January 1, 2002, and on any day
thereafter to prepay Bonds due on January 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part
and if in part, the City will notify MSTC of the particular amount to be prepaid. MSTC will
determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest to be redeemed and each participant
will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests to be redeemed. All prepayments shall
be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge net
operating revenues of its liquor, golf course and ice arena funds. The proceeds will be used to
finance improvements to the City's golf course facilities and swimming pool facilities.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,921,335 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $39,750,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Page 21
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 160 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for
purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official
Statement.
Dated September 8, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Page 22
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$17,840,000*
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING
BONDS, SERIES 1992B
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Manager or his designee on Monday,
October 5, 1992, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85
East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and
tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M.,
Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1993. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
1999
$ 545,000
2003
$1,265,000 2007 $2,515,000
2000
$ 700,000
2004
$1,410,000 2008 $3,090,000
2001
$ 760,000
2005
$1,470,000 2009 $3,325,000
2002
$1,125,000
2006
$1,635,000
* The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $500,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company
( "MSTC'), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC.
Page 23
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2000, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after February 1, 2001. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify MSTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. MSTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity
to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge tax increment
income from tax increment financing districts located within the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Project Area. The proceeds will be used to refund the 1999 -2009 maturities of
the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988, dated October 1, 1988 and
the 1999 -2009 maturities of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989,
dated April 1, 1989.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $17,608,080 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $178,400,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
Page 24
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will .be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 500 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for purposes of: distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for
purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter. of the Final Official
Statement.
Dated September 8, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Page 25
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$4,560,000*
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992C
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Manager or his designee on Monday,
October 5, 1992, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85
East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and
tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M.,
Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 1993. Interest will be
computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature January 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
1997 $110,000 2001 $315,000 2004 $380,000 2007 $445,000
1998 $160,000 2002 $345,000 2005 $410,000 2008 $495,000
1999 $310,000 2003 $350,000 2006 $435,000 2009 $505,000
2000 $300,000
* The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $200,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the_ name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company
( "MSTC "), Chicagb, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC.
Page 26
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on January 1, 2002, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after January 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify MSTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. MSTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity
to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge net
operating revenues of its liquor, golf course and ice arena funds. The proceeds will be used to
refund the 1997 -2000 maturities of the City's General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series
1985, dated September 1, 1985; the 1999 -2009 maturities of the City's General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1988, dated October 1, 1988; and the 1999 -2009 maturities
of the City's General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989, dated April 1, 1989.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $4,500,720 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $45,600,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bon_ d
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the .next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
o
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
Page 27
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 180 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for purposes of -distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (1) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for
purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official
Statement.
Dated September 8, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Page 28
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$1,925,000*
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE REFUNDING
BONDS, SERIES 1992D
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Manager or his designee on Monday,
October 5, 1992, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85
East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and
tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M.,
Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1993. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
1995 $345,000 1997 $390,000 1999 $420,000
1996 $370,000 1998 $400,000
* The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase. or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $80,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company
( "MSTC'), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC.
Page 29
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will- pledge net
revenues of its utilities fund. The proceeds will be used to refund the 1995 -1999 maturities of
the City's General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1988, dated October 1, 1988.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $1,909,600 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $19,250,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
Page 30
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 75 copies of the
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of
assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated September-8,1992
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Page 31
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$1,090,000"
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING
BONDS, SERIES 1992E
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Manager or his designee on Monday,
October 5, 1992, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85
East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and
tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M.,
Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated November 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1993. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
1996 $190,000 1998 $185,000 2000 $180,000
1997 $185,000 1999 $180,000 2001 $170,000
* The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $80,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the_ name of Kray & Co. as nominee of Midwest Securities Trust Company
( "MSTC), Chicago, Illinois, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of MSTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the City to MSTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
MSTC will be the responsibility of MSTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be
required to deposit the Bonds with MSTC.
Page 32
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge
special assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to refund the
1996 -2001 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1989, dated
April 1, 1989.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $1,079,100 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $10,900,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
Page 33
47
A&
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when. further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 50 copies of the
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of
assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated September -8, 1992
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Page 34
w9tN�.ri
o e
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: August 25, 1992
Subject:Truth in Taxation
Hearing Dates
Agenda Item # x . c .
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
County of its Truth
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
November 30 and
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Set Truth in Taxation hearing date and continuation date(s).
Info /Background
The City is required
to advise Hennepin
County of its Truth
in Taxation hearing
date(s) by September
15, 1992. All Truth
in Taxation hearings
for all governmental bodies must be
held
in the period beginning
November 30 and
ending on December
21. Continued hearings
must be held at
least 5 business
days
but no more than 14
business days after
the first public
hearings.
'
The following dates
have been selected
for Truth in Taxation
by the County and School
Districts:
Hennepin County
Tuesday, Dec. 8
Tuesday, Dec.
15
S.D. 270
Thurs., Dec. 3
Thurs., Dec.
17
S.D. 271
Tuesday, Dec. 1
Monday, Dec.
14
S.D. 272
Monday, Dec. 7
Monday, Dec.
14
S.D. 273
Monday, Dec. 14
Monday, Dec.
21
S.D. 280
Monday, Dec. 7
Monday, Dec.
21
S.D. 283
Monday, Dec. 14
Monday, Dec.
21
_ JANU_A_RY _ FEBRUARY
SUN �MDNITUE IWED(THURIFRI ISAT SUN IN10NITUE IWEDIlHURIFRI ISAT
1 2 3 4 I
5 6 7 8 9 1011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
MARCH
SUN IMONITUE I WED ITHURIFRI
1 2 3 4 5 6
ISAT
7
8
22
23
24
25
16
17
18
191201
17
24
21
22
20
L6221
28
29
301311
28
29
23
P-412512612-1121312.9
29
30
I
3
4
5-6-
7
8
MARCH
SUN IMONITUE I WED ITHURIFRI
1 2 3 4 5 6
ISAT
7
8
9
10
1112
9
13
14
15
22
16
17
24
18
25
19
20
21
23
26
27
28
29
3031
28
29
30
I
_ APRIL
SUN IMON ITUF IWEDITK+RI
1 2 3
ISAT
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
19
13
14
15
16
17
24
18
25
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
29
30
I
MAY _ JUNE J ULY AUGUST
SUN MONTUE WED HU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE IWED THII FRI SAT SUN M0 Ili iUE vVED THU FRi SAT SUN MON1TUE WEDtT FRI SAT
.W
I
2
I
2
3
4
5
6
I
12
3
4
1
I
3
4
5-6-
7
8
9
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
2
21
22
23
21
22
2,3
24
25
26
27
19
2021
22
23
24
25
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
125
26
27
28
29
30
28
29
30
262728
29
30
31
12112512612-r
28
29
_- SEPTEMBER
_
_ __OCTOBER
DECEMBER
SUN
MON
TUE
IWED
H
FRI
SAT
SUN •MpN
TUE
WED
T19 FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
_NOVEMBER
UE VLVED T
FRI
SAT
SUN
Imm
rTUE
vED
htF
FRI
SAT
1
2
3
4
5
-_
1511-6
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1011
12
4
-7_
8
9
10
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
_9
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
15
16
17
18
19
2021
13
14
15
16
17
19
2021
22
23
2 4
25
26
18
19
20
21
22
22123124125
26127
28
20
21
22
23
24
L25
26
1231241
27
28
29
30
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
29
30
127
28
2930
31
Yellow Marker
indicates
dates
in November
and-December
which
can not be used for
Truth in
Taxation
Hearings
for
the
City
of
Edina
.W
DOBSEY .& WHITNEY
A P.v ..... taw Paome.z — C..so o..
350 PARK AVENUE
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
201 FIRST AVENUE, S. W., SUITE 340
NEW YORK. NEW TORE 10022
ROCHESTER, MINNEBOTA 55900
(212)415-9200
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -1498
(507)288 -3156.
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W.
( 612) 340-2600
1200 FIRST ANTERSTATE CENTER
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
TELEX 29-0605
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(202)857 -0700 -
(406)252 -3800
—
FAX (612) 340-2868
-
3 ORACECHURCH STREET
507 DAVIDSON BUILDING,
LONDON BC3V OAT, BNOLAND
ORBAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
44- 71-929-3334 -
(406)727- 3632
36. RUE TRONCHET
JIM1M P. Gn"GAN
127 EAST FRONT STREET
78009 PARIS, PRANCE
(6I2) 340-2M
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
33-1-42-66-59-49
(406)721-6025
35 SQUARE DE MEEUS
801 GRAND. SUITE 3900
B -1040 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
DBS MOINHS, IOWA 50009
32-2-504 -46-11
(515) 283 -l000
September 3, 1992 .
Mr: John Wallin
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: 1992 Bond Issues
Dear John:
Enclosed for consideration by the City Council at its meeting on
September 8th is a form of resolution calling for the sale of the General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds and various refunding bonds. To be attached to the
resolution is the Terms of Proposal prepared by Springsted Incorporated.
Each of the bonds will be issued and sold separately. This permits the
City Council to reject all of the bids for one or more issues and proceed with, the
remaining issues.
Should you have any questions, please give me a call.
Yours truly,
Jerome P. Gilligan
JPG:cmn
Enclosure
�-cc: Rusty Fifield
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS,
SERIES 1992A, GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX.
INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992B,
GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992C, GENERAL
OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE REFUNDING
BONDS, SERIES 1992D AND GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992E
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Edina,. Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. It is hereby determined to be in the best interests of
the City to issue the following series of bonds of the City (collectively, the Bonds) for
the following purposes:
A. General Obligation Recreational. Facility Bonds, Series. 1992A,
pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 and Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475, to finance the acquisition and betterment of municipal
recreational facilities of the City.
B. General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series.
1992B, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to refund the
General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988 of the City,
initially dated as of October 1, 1988, maturing in the years 1997 through
2009, and the General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 of
the City, initially dated as of April 1, 1989, maturing in the years 1999
through 2009.
C. General Obligation Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds,
Series 1992C, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to refund
the General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 of the city,
initially dated as of September 1, 1985, maturing in the years 1997
through 2000, the General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds,
Series 1988 of the City, initially dated as of October 1, 1988, maturing in
the years 1999 through 2009, and the General Obligation Recreational
Facility Bonds, Series 1989 of the City, initially dated as of April 1, 1989,
maturing in the years 1999 through 2009.
D. General Obligation Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series
1992D, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to refund the
General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1988 of the City,
initially dated as of October 1, 1988, maturing in the years 1995 through
1999.
E. General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series
1992E, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to refund the
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1989 of the City,
initially dated as of April 1, 1989, maturing in the years 1996 through
2001.
Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated, financial
consultant to the City, has presented to this Council forms of Terms of Proposal for
-each series of Bonds, which are attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be
placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Terms of
Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the sale
thereof. Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisers, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9) is hereby authorized
to solicit bids for each series of Bonds on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis.
Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet at the City Hall on
Monday, October 5, 1992, at 7:00 o'clock P.M, for the purpose of considering sealed
bids for the purchase of the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in
the best interests of the City.
Attest:
Clerk
-2-
Mayor
f
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 1
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=-----------
129748
09/08/92
$62.40
AARESTED,.DRU
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$62.40*
129749
09/08/92
$127.02
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPP
ACCESSORIES
016723 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3042
< *>
$127.02*
129750
09/08/92
$36.00
ACCESS PRESS
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
081192
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
_ < *>
$36.00*
129751
09/08/92
$9.65
ACTION MESSENGER
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
90074
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR EQU
09/08/92
526.70
ACTION MESSENGER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
91034
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
3601
< *>
$36.35*
129752
09/08/92
$195.71
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
05638555
BUILDING & GRO
ALARM SERVICE
3599
09/08/92
$88.18
ADT SECURITY SYS:
ALARM SERVICE
05539305
BUILDING & GRO
ALARM SERVICE
3598
< *>
$283.89*
129753
09/08/92
$13.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2474364
PW'BUILDING
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$32.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2474364
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$6.50
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2474364
COMMUNICATIONS
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$6.50
AIRSIGNAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2474364
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$153.51
AIRSIGNAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2474364
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$211.51*
129754
09/08/92
$15.25
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
141206
ADMINISTRATION
BLUE PRINTING
29.98
09/08/92 .$506.52
ALBINSON
LUMBER
145287
ENGINEERING GE
LUMBER
2998
< *>
$521.77*
129755
09/08/92
$101.50
ALEXANDER, JEFF
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$101.50*
129756
09/08/92
$319.50
ALL STAR CARPET CLEA
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12007
CITY HALL GENE..CONTR
REPAIRS
3558
< *>
$319.50*
129757
09/08/92
$56.01
ALLIED PLASTICS
PAINT
29472
CENTENNIAL LAK.PAINT
3310
< *>
$56.01*
129758
09/08/92
$527.00
ALSTAD, MARIAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$13.30
ALSTAD, MARIAN
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$540.30*
129759
09/08/92
$73.49
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
16999
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3165
09/08/92
$88.7
6
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
16997
EQUIPMENT OPER.REPAIR
PARTS
3422
09/08/92
$10.12
ALTERNATOR "REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
17956
EQUIPMENT'OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3318
09/08/92
$168.70
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
008207
FIRE DEPT.'GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
3136
< *>
$341.07*
129760
09/08/92
$123.31
AMERICAN RED CROSS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6605
SWIMMING INSTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$123.31*
129761
09/08/92
$167.33
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
081592
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$167.33*
129762
09/08/92.
$26.36
ANDERSON, DERICK
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
090192
ENGINEERING GE'MILEAGE
< *>
$26.36*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 2.
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129763
09/08/92
$74.90
ARCTIC DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
4450
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$74.90*
129764
09/08/92
$50.42
ARMSTRONG MEDICAL
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
0222495
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
2389
< *>
$50.42*
129765
09/08/92
$259.00
ASCAP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
082092
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
09/08/92
$226.67
ASCAP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
082092/A
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$485.67*
129766
09/08/92
$60.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
44955
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$23.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
45061
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
3715
09/08/92
$24.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
45652
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$107.00*
129767
09/08/92
$111.80
ASSOCIATED BAG COMPA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
N53596
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$111.80*
129768
09/08/92
$13.35
AT &T CONS PROD DIV
TELEPHONE
082592
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$14.68
AT &T CONS PROD DIV
TELEPHONE
082692
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.03*
129769
09/08/92
$961.13
AUDIO VISUAL WHSE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90378
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
3157
< *>
$961.13*
129770
09/08/92
$41.00
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
14147
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3623
09/08/92
$30.00
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
14165
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3322
< *>
$71.00*
129771
09/08/92
$137.00
AUTOTRAAC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4979
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$'137.00*
129772
09/08/92
$48.75
AXT -LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
081192
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$38.58,
AXT -LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
090192
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
<*>
$87.33*
129773
09/08/92
$1,910.23
BACHMANS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
195340
GENERAL.STORM
CONTR REPAIRS
7378
09/08/92
$641.36
BACHMANS
PLANTINGS & TREES
202537
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
2156
< *>
$2,551.59*
129774
09/08/92
$222.85
BAILEY NURSERIES
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
035101 -0
CENTENNIAL LAK
TREES.FLWR SH
2395
09/08/92
- $143.75
BAILEY NURSERIES
PLANTINGS & TREES
070892
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
129775
09/08/92
$58.80
BALDWIN SUPPLY CO.
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
342265
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
3401
< *>
$58.80*
129776
09/08/92
$227.91
BANNER CANVAS
ACCESSORIES
3282
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3344
< *>
$227.91*
129777
09/08/92
$475.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
081292
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
3669
< *>
$475.00*
129778
09/08/92
$90.11
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
200515
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3235
09/08/92
$227.05
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
200516
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3234
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O_#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------
129778
09/08/92
$352.79
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
200686
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2926
09/08/92
$309.25
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
201878
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
3388
09/08/92
$41.09
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
ACCESSORIES
202331
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3235
< *>
$1,020.29*
129779
09/08/92
$180.74
BECKEMAN, GEORGE JR
AMBULANCE FEES
081492
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$180.74*
129780
09/08/92
$1,762:25
BEER.WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
09/08/92
$57.60
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF.
GDS MI
< *>
$1,819.85*
129781
09/08/92
$100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129782
09/08/92
$26.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
733271/
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPM
09/08/92
$76.50
BENSON OPTICAL
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
739288
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTH
9552
09/08/92
$46.50
BENSON OPTICAL
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
746992
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTH
9552
09/08/92
$44.85
BENSON OPTICAL
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
756728
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTH
9552
09/08/92
$46.50
BENSON OPTICAL
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
756731
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTH
9552
09/08/92
$59.50
BENSON OPTICAL
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
785261
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTH
9552
09/08/92
$41.50
BENSON. OPTICAL
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
795497
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY
EQUIPM
09/08/92
$42.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
806878
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPM
< *>
$384.35"
129783
09/08/92
$114.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF-GD
LIQ
09/08/92
$295.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQ
09/08/92
$273.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
AUGUST V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQ
< *>
$682.50*
129785
09/08/92
$18.74
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
804908
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$45.27
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
805579
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE.SUPPLI
3351
09/08/92
$6.35
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
806924
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$39,64
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
806924
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL
SUPPL.
09/08/92
$93.91
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809048
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$4.05
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809048
FINANCE
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$25.73
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
.GENERAL SUPPLIES
809048
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$16.19
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809048
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$45.16
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809096
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$260.09
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809098B1
ELECTION
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$157.74
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
809098
ELECTION
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
-$5.07
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CM809048
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$4.22
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
.811039
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$40.47
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
811039
FINANCE
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$2.13
BERTELSON BROS: INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
811039
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE
SUPPLI
;
09/0.8/92
$211.30
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
809104
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE
SUPPLI
09/08/92
- $238.42
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CM809098
ELECTION
GENERAL
SUPPL
< *>
$727.50*
129786
09/08/92
$53.20
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
REPAIR PARTS
028921
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
3320
09/08/92
$9.75
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
029904
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPL
09/08/92
$50.00
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
029914
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3585
< *>
$112.95*
129787
09/08/92
$7.5.00
BETSWORTH, JACKI
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 17,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC
OTHER
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 4
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
< *>
$75.00*
129788
09/08/92
$3,507.86
BFI OF MN INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082592
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3.507.86*
129789
09/08/92
5203.00
BISHOP TRAVEL CENTER
CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS
012729
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
3668
< *>
$203.00*
129790
09/08/92
$215.93
BJORKS COUNTRY STONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
072992
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
2925
< *>
$215.93*
129791
09/08/92
$82.50
BLEDSOE, SARA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$82.50*
129792
09/08/92
$42.60
BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
1209682
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$126.30
BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY
COST OF. GOODS SOLD FO
4209790-
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$42.10
BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
4210127-
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$211.00*
129793
09/08/92
$10.0.00
BLOOD DAVID
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129794
09/08/92
$66.31
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
6316
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
1808
09/08/92
$316.00
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
5350 572
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$382.31*
129795
09/08/92
$23.40
BLUMBERG PHOTO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BM85490-
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
3586
< *>
$23.40*
129796
09/08/92
$2,283.79
BORDER STATES INDUS.T
REPAIR PARTS
08032 =79
YORK OCCUPANCY
REPAIR PARTS
2643
09/08/92
$332.62
BORDER STATES INDUST
REPAIR PARTS
08032 -79
YORK OCCUPANCY
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$2,616.41*
129797
09/08/92
$210.49
BOYER TRUCKS '
ACCESSORIES
154705
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3329
< *>
$210:49*
129798
09/08/92
$12.60
BRADLEY BENN
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
09/08/92
$112.50
BRADLEY BENN
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$46.95
BRADLEY BENN
CRAFT SUPPLIES
090292
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
< *>
$172.05*
129799
09/08/92
$29.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
POSTAGE
081192
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
09/08/92
$24.48
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
081192
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
09/08/92
$12.01
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
TOOLS
081192
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
09/08/92
$46.79
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081192
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$12.78
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
FERTILIZER
081192
MAINT OF COURS
FERTILIZER
09/08/92
$36.95
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
PLANTINGS & TREES
081192
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
09/08/92
$37.56
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
08.1192
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$199.57*
129800
09/08/92
$190.40
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56825001
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3395
09/08/92
$117.98
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56932001
GENERAL STORM.
GENERAL SUPPL
3461
< *>
$308.38*
129801
09/08/92
$282.50
BRUMFIELD ADRIANE
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 5
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #.
< *>
$282.50*
129802
09/08/92
$230.77
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
INFIELD MIXTURE
162716
FIELD MAINTENA
INFIELD MIX
2079
09/08/92
$382.56
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
INFIELD MIXTURE
170192
FIELD MAINTENA
INFIELD MIX
2079
< *>
$613.33*
129803
09/08/92
$40.50
BUSINESS MACHINES SA
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
110641
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQU
3457
< *>
$40.50*
129804
09/08/92
$100.00
BUTLER GEORGE
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE. PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129805
09/08/92
$306.25
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
140453
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3379
< *>
$306.25*
129806.09/08/92
$363.24
C &K SEED INC
SEED
7101
GENERAL TURF.0
SEED
3744
< *>
$363.24*
129807.09/08/92
$900.00
C.F. DALLMAN COMPANY
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
090192
TREE 6 YR
CIP
<*>
$900.00*
129808
09/08/92
$28.98
CALIBRE PRESS INC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082192
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$28.98*
129809
09/08/92
$30.00
CANAKES, BARB
REGISTRATION FEES
082492
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
129810
09/08/92
$4,704.95
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIO
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CAP -1422
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
3095
< *> --
$4,704.95*
129811
09/08/92
$105.75
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
55287
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
3762
09/08/92
$258.69
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
55311
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
3763
09/08/92
$335.69
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
55330
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
3762
<R>
$700.13
*.
129812
09/08/92
$675.00
CARMICHAEL, TARA
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$675.00*
129813
09/08/92
$100.13
CDP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01574761
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$24.93
CDP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081492
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$125.06*
129814
09/08/92
$26.00
CECCONI, ANNA
CLASS REFUND /ART CENT
081892
ART CENTER ADM
REGISTRATION
< *>
$26.00*
129815.09/08/92
$113.33
CELLULAR ONE
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
082192/K
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
09/08/92
$186.09
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$29.94
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$24.47
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$763.10
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192 /P
.DARE
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$61.79
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$13.88
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/P
POLICE DEPT.. G
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$59.77
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$84.94
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
09/08/92
$71.71
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
082192
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 6
CHECK#
----------.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR.
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
129815
09/08/92
$102.98
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
082192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
.$1,512:00*
129816
09/08/92
$137.93
CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPL
COST OF
GOODS SOLD.FO
14817
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3269
< *>
$137.93*
129817
09/08/92
$32.00
CHAMPINE, RUTH
CLASS REFUND /ART CENT
081892
ART CENTER ADM
REGISTRATION
< *>
$32.00*
129818
09/08/92
$21.20
CHANDLER, JANET
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
082492
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$21.20*
129819
09/08/92
$60.60
CHEM CONCEPTS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
0543
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3681
< *>
$60.60*
1.29820
09/08/92
$42.50
CITY BEER
COST OF
GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$42.50*
129821
09/08/92
523.20
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER &WATER
080792
CENTENNIAL LAK.SEWER
& WATER
09/08/92
$249.65
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER &
WATER
080792 1
BUILDING & GRO
SEWER & WATER
09/08/92
$8.71
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER &
WATER
080792 2
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
09/08/92
$31.91
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER &
WATER
080792 3
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
< *>
$313.47*
129822
09/08/92
$49.84
CITY OF RICHFIELD
LIGHT &
POWER
073192
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT .& POWER
< *>
$49.84*
129823
09/08/92.
$367.00
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING OTHER
1168
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERT OTHER
3759
< *>
$367.00*
129824
09/08/92
$30.00
CLIFFORD, KEELY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
090192
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$30.00*
129825
09/08/92
$335.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
.073192
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
2529
09/08/92
$201.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
073192
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$439.37
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$976.37*
129826.09/08/92
$89.60
COCKRIEL, VINCE
MILEAGE
OR ALLOWANCE
081792
PARK MAINTENAN
MILEAGE
09/08/92
$34.00
COCKRIEL, VINCE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
081792
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$123.60*
129827
09/08/92
$100.04
COCKRIEL, VINCE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
081792
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$100.04*
129828
09/08/92
$349.29
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
100058
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
3383
09/08/92
$134.75
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
102754
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
3497
09/08/92
$57.46
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
105486
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
4001
09/08/92
$79.86
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
SERVICE
CONTRACTS EQU
105486
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR_EQU
< *>
$621.36*
129829
09/08/92
$36.91
COMTECH INC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
020950
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$36.91*
129830
09/08/92
$15.44
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUC
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
440079 -0
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
2878
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 7
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK.AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129830
09/08/92
$302.30
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUC
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
475698 -0
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
2393
< *>
$317.74*
129831
09/08/92
$25.00
CONNOLLY, BOB
VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU
SEPT 20,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
.
129832.09/08/92
$1,696.65
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18555
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
2778
< *>
$1,696.65*
129833
09/08/92
$969.15
CONTACT MOBILE COMM
MEN'S CLUB
24901
GOLF PROG
MEN'S.CLUB
3204
< *>
$969.15*
129834
09/08/92
$21.60
COUGAR SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
106456
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3208
< *>
$21.60*
129835
09/08/92
$75.00
COUGHLIN, DENNY
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082692
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$75.00*
129836
09/08/92
$65.00
COURAGE CENTER
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
013718
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
< *>
$65.00*
129837
09/08/92
$25.20
CRABS, CINDY
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$25.20*
129838
09/08/92
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS TIMOTHY J M
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090192
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< ■>
$1,386.67*
129839
09/08/92
$5.60
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17905
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
09/08/92
$46.50
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17991
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
09/08/92
$268.80
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17992
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
09/08/92
$22.00.
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18044
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
09/08/92
$3,028.00.
CSI
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
18110
FIRE DEPT., GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
1671
09/08/92
$42.10
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18141
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
09/08/92
$25.00
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18057
FIRE DEPT: GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
< *>
$3,438.00*
129840
09/08/92
$27.40
CULLIGAN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
073192
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICE
< *>
$27.40*
129841
09/08/92
$435.00
CUMMINS DIESEL SALES
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
0892
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$435.00*
129842.09/08/92
$138.55
CURTIS 1000
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6580717
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPL
3197
< *>
$138.55*
129843
09/08/92
E10.32
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
55297
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3212
09/08/92
$137.84
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55349
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3283
09/08/92
$111.35
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
55352
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
.3217
09/08/92
$144.60
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
55632
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3515
09/08/92
$6.82
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
55670
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3517
< *>
$410.93*
129844
09/08/92
$904.25
CUSTOM FIRE APP
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
004112
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
09/08/92
$300.00
CUSTOM FIRE APP
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
004130
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$1,204.25*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 8
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
129845
09/08%92
$45.43
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
285740
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$45.43*
129846
09/08/92
$45.65
DAEHN, MARCELLA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
082792
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
09/08/92
$8.00
DAEHN, MARCELLA
MEETING EXPENSE
082792
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
09/08/92
$3.00
DAEHN, MARCELLA
MEETING EXPENSE
082792
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL'
< *>
$56.65*
129847
09/08/92
$33.60
DARNELL. EILEEN
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *.>
$33:60*
12984.8
09/08/92
$321.30
DAVE S FOOD WAGON
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
083192
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9030
< *>
$321.30*
129849
09/08/92
$37.28
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
28614
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
2264
09/08/92
$472.86
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
29424
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3239
09/08/92
$52.27
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
29780
SEWER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
3406
09/08/92
$64.01
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
30159
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3529
< *>
$626.42*
129850
09/08/92
$254.54
DAYTONS COMMERCIAL I
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
37525
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
3560
< *>
$254.54*
129851
09/08/92
$838.80
DCA INC
HOSPITALIZATION
50777
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$838.80*
129852
09/08/92
$11:85
DECKAS, EVELYN
AMBULANCE FEES
090192-
GENERAL.FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$11.85*
129853
09/08/92
$2,774.40
DELTA DENTAL
HOSPITALIZATION
082892
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$2,774.40*
129854
09/08/92
$112.00
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
44040
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$112.00*
129855
09/08/92
$644.50
DICKER, TOBIE
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$120.50
DICKER, TOBIE
PT-AC MAINT
090292
ART CENTER BLD
SALARIES TEMP
09/08/92
$10.50
DICKER, TOBIE
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
<*>
$775.50*
-
129856
09/08/92
$576.14
DISPATCH COMM /MN
RADIO SERVICE
21327
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
09/08/92
$105.40
DISPATCH COMM /MN
RADIO SERVICE
99769
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
2768
09/08/92
$417.48
DISPATCH COMM /MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
99871
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3284
09/08/92
$80.94
DISPATCH COMM /MN
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
21967
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$1,179.96*
129857
09/08/92
$485.00
DORSEY & WHITNEY
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
285663
GC CIP
CIP
09/08/92
$745.00
DORSEY & WHITNEY
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
288885
GC CIP
CIP
09/08/92
$10,428.79
DORSEY & WHITNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERV - L
083192
LEGAL SERVICES
PRO SVC - LEG
< *>
$11,658.79*
129858
09/08/92
$213.81
DPC INDUSTRIES
CHEMICALS
00925714
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
09/08/92
$385.45
DPC INDUSTRIES
CHEMICALS
00926204
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
< *>
$599.26*
129554
9/8/42
$569.12
Ed Kraemer & Sons
Fill M—rial
28852
Distribution
Fill Material
$569.12*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3,.1992, 9:41 PM
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------
129859
09/08/92
- $165.83
E -Z -GO TEXTRON.
REPAIR
PARTS /CREDIT
275270
GOLF CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
09/08/92
$170.34
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR
PARTS
0305596
GOLF CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
3364
09/08/92
$99.32
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR
PARTS
0306511
GOLF. CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
3215
09/08/92
$165.19
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR
PARTS
0307646
GOLF CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
3367
< *>
$269.02*
129860
09/08/92
$70.03
EAGLE ELEVATOR
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
5057
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$70.03*
129861
09/08/92
$21.68
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
596176
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$22.67
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
596179
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$258.03
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
599330
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$45.39
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
598580
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$21.68
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
598582
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$510.00
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS. SOLD
BE
601646
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS BE
< *>
$879.45*
129862
09/08/92
$374.03
EARL F. ANDERSON.
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
117442
PARKS
CIP
3250
09/08/92
$142.85
EARL F. ANDERSON
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
117662
PATHS &,HARD S
PROF SERVICES
3445
< *>
$516.88*
129863
09/08/92
$45.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$8,114.60
EAST SIDE - BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
< *>
$8,159.80*
129864
09/08/92
$70.00
EBERT, BRENT
REGISTRATION FEES
081492
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$70.00*
129865
09/08/92
$96.30
ED PHILLIPS.& SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
25913'
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
09/08/92
$12.10
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD.MI
25912
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/08/92
$165.25
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
29034
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
< *>
8273.65*
129866
09/08/92
$25.00
EDINA CHAM OF,COM
ADVERTISING
OTHER
090192
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERT
OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
129867
09/08/92
$168,176.00
EDINA FIRE RELIEF AS
POLICE
AID 1%
083092
GENERAL FD PRO
POLICE
AID 1%
< *>
$168,176.00*
129868
09/08/92
$384.00
EDINROSE INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
46893
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD F00
3126
< *>
$384.00*
129869
09/08/92
$6.96
ELVIN SAFETY
GENERAL_
SUPPLIES
92212 -14
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
2381
09/08/92
$72.12
ELVIN SAFETY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
92238 -07
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPL
3594
< *>
879.08*
129870
09/08/92.
$66.50
EMPIE, JOHN
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL
SALES
< *>
$66.50*
129871
09/08/92
$300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
SEPTEMBE
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$300.00*
129872
09/08/92
$150.30
ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY
REPAIR
PARTS
117162 .
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
3062
< *>
$150.30*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129873
09/08/92
$190.75
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
14695
POOL.OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$190.75*
129874
09/08/92
$31.00
ERICKSON, ASHLEY
CLASS REFUND /ART CENT
081892
ART CENTER ADM
REGISTRATION
< *>
$31.00*
129875
09/08/92
$316.90
ESS BROS & SONS
CASTINGS
5809
GENERAL STORM
CASTINGS
3411
< *>
$316.90*
129876
09/08/92
$5,000.00
FAIRWAY ARCHITECTS I
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081992
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$5,000.00*
129877
09/08/92
$101.85
FEED.RITE CONTROL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
183832
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$1,565.12
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL
103686
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
1169
09/08/92
$63.77
FEED RITE CONTROL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
183853
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$1,730.74*
129878
09/08/92
$17.25
FELTON, ERIC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
09/08/92
$33.59
FELTON, ERIC
MEETING EXPENSE
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPEN
09/08/92
$67.30
FELTON, ERIC
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
09/08/92
$25.50
FELTON, ERIC
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
09/08/92
$260.86
FELTON, ERIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$43.30
FELTON, ERIC
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
081792
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
< *>
$447.80*
129879
09/08/92
$25.00
FERTIG, CAROL
REFUND SKATING
JUNE 17
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM I
< *>
$25.00*
129880
09/08/92
$39.61
'FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASS
BOOKS & PHAMPHLETS
1726
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PHAMP
3294
<*>
$39..61*
129881
09/08/92
$55.48
FLANDERS, PAT
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$55.48*
129882
09/08/92
$56.35
FLEET TECH SERVICE C
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
005941
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$56.35*
129883
09/08/92
$898.54
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55807
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
2529
09/08/92
$129.06
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
REPAIR PARTS
55919
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3469
09/08/92
$140.00
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
REPAIR PARTS
80044
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3390
< *>
$1,167.60*
129884
09/08/92
$22.93
FOOTE, JOANNA
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
082392
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
09/08/92
$35.00
FOOTE, JOANNA
MEETING EXPENSE
082592
COMMUNICATIONS
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$57.93*
129885
09/08/92
$1,481.82
FORTIS BENEFITS
LONG TERM DISABILITY
082892
CENT SVC GENER
LNG TRM DISAB
< *>
$1,481.82*
129886
09/08/92
$110.53
FOWLER ELECTRIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
472230
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3436
< *>
$110.53*
129887
09/08/92
$3,358.00
FRANK B HALL & CO
INSURANCE
086066
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/08/92
$10,071.00
FRANK B HALL & CO
INSURANCE
086065
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$13.429.00*
COUNCIL CHECK.REGISTER THU, SEP- 3,.1992, 9:41 PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129888
09/08/92
$506.50
GARTNER REFRIG INC.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
008188
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3201
09/08/92
$122.61
GARTNER REFRIG INC.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
008523
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3094
< *>
$629.11"
129889
09/08/92
$33.00
GARVENS GREETING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
2610
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< ">
$33.00*
129890
09/08/92
$28.00
GEM TAP SERV
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
110502
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
9031
< *>
$28.00*
129891
09/08/92
- $25.86
GENERAL PARTS & SUPP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
700215
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$154.09
GENERAL PARTS & SUPP ..
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
700559
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
3106
< *>
$128..23*
129892
09/08/92
$360.00
GEREBI, LIZ
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$360.00*
129893
09/08/92
$100.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
920817
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$100.00*
129894
09/08/92
$65.00
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
13918'
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$65.00*
129895
09/08/92
$637.50
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
2070219
SUPERV. & OVRH
GOPHER STATE.
< *>
$637.50*
129896
09/08/92
$8.92
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
495049
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
2950
< *>
$8.92*
129897
09/08/92
$42.08
GREAT AMERICAN MARIN
REPAIR PARTS
2634
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
3431
09/08/92
$254.95
GREAT AMERICAN MARIN
REPAIR PARTS
2638
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2134
< *>
$297.03"
129898
09/08/92
$848.00
GREAT GREENS INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
082592
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
3203
< *>
$848.00"
129899
09/08/92_
$3,748.50
GREUPNER, JOE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,748.50*
129900
09/08/92
$184.80
GRIFFITH, JOHNATHAN
SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYE
0902.92
ART CENTER BLD'SALARIES
TEMP
< *>
$184.80"
129901
09/08/92
$49.58
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
593043
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
< *>
$49.58*
129902
09/08/92
$16,088.16
GROUP HEALTH INC.
HOSPITALIZATION
082892
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< ">
$16,088.16*
129903
09/08/92
$140.00
GROUP PROMOTION SERV
CENTRAL SERVICES GENE
1119
ART CENTER ADM
CS GENERAL
3505
< *>
$140.00*
129904
09/08/92
$453.50
GUST, MARGARET.
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$453.50*
129905
09/08/92
530.00
GUST, MARGARET
VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU
SEPT 13,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3, 1992, 9:41
PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$30.00*
129906
09/08/92
$102.41
HACH CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
837567
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPL
3479
< *>
$102.41*
129907
09/08/92
$75.60
HAEFELE, JEAN
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$75.60*
129908
09/08/92
$75.00
HALL, KEVIN
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
081492
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
129909
09/08/92
$30.00
HALL, MARILYN
VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU
SEPT 13,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
129910
09/08/92
$25.00
HALL, MARILYN
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
082692
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
<*>
$25.00*
-
129911
09/08/92
$58.50
HALLMAN
LUBRICANTS
133468
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
2874
09/08/92
$212.04
HALLMAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
136388
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3435
<*>
$270:54*
129912
09/08/92
$70.90
HAMM ASSOC LTD
GENERAL SUPPLIES /GIFT
090292
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$70.90*
129913
09/08/92
$46.16
HAMMER, NANCY
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
>
$46.16*
129914
09/08/92
$158.51
HANLON, NORMA
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$158.51*
129915
09/08/92
$30.10
HANNA, JUNE
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$30.10*
129916
09/08/92
$50.00
HAPPY FACES
VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU
SEPT 13,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
129917
09/08/92
$264.56
HARMON GLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
72001570
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3229
< *>
$264.56*
129918
09/08/92
$32,490.00
HARRIS HOMEYER
CO.
INSURANCE
090192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/08/92
$10,594.00
HARRIS HOMEYER.CO.
INSURANCE
090192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/08/92
$7,554.00
HARRIS HOMEYER
CO.
INSURANCE
090192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$50,638.00*
129919
09/08/92
$118.00
HAYWA, PHYLLIS
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$118.00*
129920
09/08/92
$55.00
HEATH COMPANY
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
082592
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
< *>
$55.00*
129921
09/08/92
$59.77
HEDGES, DIANA
CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE
080292
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
09/08/92
$58.18
HEDGES, DIANA
OFFICE SUPPLIES / ART
080292
ART CENTER ADM
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$117.95*
129922
09/08/92
$769
-34
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
081492
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
9033
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 13
CHECK#
.DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129922
09/08/92
$598.71
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
082792
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9033
< *>
$1,368.05*
129923
09/08/92
$25.30
HEMSTAD, BETTY
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG_
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$25:30*
129924
09/08/92
$468.19
'HENN CTY MED CENTER
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
1908
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
8897
< *>
$468.19*
129925
09/08/92
$90.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
JUNE 199
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
09/08/92
$20.59
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
JUNE 199
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
09/08/92
$1,001.20
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
BOARD & ROOM.PRISONER
JULY 199
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRIS
< *>
$1,111.79*
129926
09/08/92
$649.80
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
PLANTINGS & TREES
21030
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
,
< *>
$649.80*
129927
09/08/92
$3,435.40
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
000762
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRIS
<*>
$3,435.40
*.
129928
09/08/92
$45.08
HINTON. LAURA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
083192
CONSTRUCT.PROG
MILEAGE
129929
09/08/92
$395.00
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M
LINE MARKING POWDER
24167
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POW
2611
< *>
$395.00*
129930
09/08/92
$100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129931
09/08/92
$1,136.00
HORWATH, TOM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082592
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$155.40
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
082592
TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$1,291.40*
129932
09/08/92
$2,318.61
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
4937
UTILITY PROG:
INVENTORY WAT
8536
09/08/92
$4,999.92
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
4999
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
8536
09/08/92
$2,758.35
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
4998
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
8536
< *>
$10,076.88*
129933
09/08/92
$505.24
INDELCO CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
77737
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3086
< *>
$505.24*
.
129934
09/08/92
$22.15
INTERIOR COM SYS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
039065
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$109.20
INTERIOR COM SYS
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
39067
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
3761
< *>
$131.35*
129935
09/08/92
$56.90
ISIA
PRINTING
034182
ARENA ADMINIST
PRINTING
2646
09/08/92
$142.67
ISIA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034545
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
3263
< *>
$199.57*
129936
09/08/92
$180.00
J THOMAS NELSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$180.00*
129937
09/08/92
$G62
.886
J &W INSTRUMENTS INC
REPAIR PARTS
61888
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3468
6
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3. 1992, 9:41 PM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129938
09/08/92
$3,277.60
J -CRAFT INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12318 -34
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
2865
< *>
83,277.60"
129939
09/08/92
$829.92
JAFFEE,JAY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082492
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$829.92*
129940
09/08/92
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129941
09/08/92
$60.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
090192
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$60.00*
129942
09/08/92
$62.35
JERRYS FOODS
CRAFT SUPPLIES
081492
ART .CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
09/08/92
$24.99
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081492
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$71.28
JERRYS FOODS
MEETING EXPENSE
081492
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
09/08/92
$12.78
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
081492
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CLEANING SUPP
09/08/92
$138.06
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081492
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$220.40
JERRYS FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
081492
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$529.86"
129943
09/08/92
$73.19
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
C12609
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
3374
09/08/92
$105.30
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
C12682 -1
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
3377
< *>
$.178.49*
129944
09/08/92
$100.00
JOHNSON WALTER
PERSbNAL_SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS.SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
129945
09/08/92
$68.81
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
7594427
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
< *>
$68.81*
129946
09/08/92
$31.00
JOHNSON, ALYSSA
CLASS REFUND /ART CENT
081892
ART CENTER ADM
REGISTRATION
< *>
$31.00*
129947
09/08/92
$69.73
JOHNSON, MARY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
.082092
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$69.73*
129948
09/08/92
$11.48
JOHNSON, NAOMI
LAUNDRY
081892
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
09/08/92
$133.73
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
081892
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
09/08/92
$25.00
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ADVERTISING OTHER
081892
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$170.21"
129949
09/08/92
$32.00
JOHNSTONS SALES & SE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
95264
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$70.55
JOHNSTONS SALES & SE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
95286
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3580
09/08/92
$53.24
JOHNSTONS SALES & SE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
95505
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3579
< *>
$155.79*
129950
09/08/92
$199.71
JR JOHNSON SUP
FERTILIZER
69470
BUILDING & GRO
FERTILIZER
2464
< *>
$199.71*
129951
09/08/92
. $150.00
JUST US
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 18,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$150
-00*
129952
09/08/92
$13.76
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
60624
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3038
< *>
513.76*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3,
1992, 9:41 PM
page 15
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129953
09/08/92
$288.09
K &V
LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4893
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3180
< *>
$288.09*
129954
09/08/92
$322.44
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
A720351
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3154
< *>
$322.44*
129955
09/08/92
$490.29
KAR
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
684011
MAINT OF.000RS
GENERAL SUPPL
3218
< *>
$490.29*
129956
09/08/92
$55.00
KIBORT,
ANDY
OFFICE ADM /AC
090292
ART CENTER ADM
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
$55.00*
129958
09/08/92
$85.90
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
026180
PARKS
CIP
3058
09/08/92
$13.25
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
026378
PARKS
CIP
3130
09/08/92
$105.42
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
026631
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3141
09/08/92
$12.08
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
026772
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3163
09/08/92
$12.75
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
027237
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3244
09/08/92
$25.55
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
027620
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPL
3271
09/08/92
$25.05
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
027671
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPL
3275
09/08/92
$118.94
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
028008
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3246
09/08/92
$53.21
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
028126
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
3413
09/08/92
$91.54
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
028165
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
3421
09/08/92
$16.10
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
028127
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3517
09/08/92
$32.50
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
378194
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3424
09/08/92
$59.45
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
028596 -
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3473
09/08/92
$27.34
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
028674
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3478
09/08/92
$14.16
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
028731
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3482
- .09/08/92
$60.00
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
029821
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3658
< *>
.$753.24*
129959
09/08/92
$92.50
KOCHENASH,
RICK
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$92.50*
129960
09/08/92
$475.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
52429
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
3371
< *>
$475.00*
129961
09/08/92
$144.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST.OF. GDS BE
< *>
$144.00*
129962
09/08/92
$1,311.25
KUNDE CO INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
072592
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$1,311.25*
129963
09/08/92
$363.00
LABOR RELATIONS ASN.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
080192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
c *>
$363.00*
129964
09/08/92
$187.50
LAHET,
TERA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$187.50*
129965
09/08/92
$163.00
LAKE
COUNTRY CHAPTER
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082692
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$163.00*
129966
09/08/92
$115.00
LAKE
RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1764
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3389
09/08/92
$138.00
LAKE
RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1728
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3348
09/08/92
$920.00
LAKE
RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1885
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3386
09/08/92
$367.00
LAKE
RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3755
PONDS & LAKES
PROF. SERVICES
3408
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 16
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129966
09/08/92
$218.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3754
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3407
09/08/92
$218.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3760
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3555
09/08/92
$240.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3286
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3546
< *>
$2,216.00*
129967
09/08/92
$45.00
LANCELLO, ED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090192
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$14.00
LANCELLO, ED
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
082992
STREET REVOLVI
MILEAGE
< *>
$59.00*
129968
09/08/92
$106.29
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
503152
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3210
09/08/92
$204.48
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
SOD & BLACK DIRT
503219
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
09/08/92
$72.42
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
503588
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3438
< *>
$383.19*
129969
09/08/92
$105.00
LARK, MADELL
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$105.00*
129971
09/08/92
$216.04
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
1785247
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
2796
09/08/92
$323.71
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1786779
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
2798
09/08/92
$301.15
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1786270
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
2797
09/08/92
$306.87
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1790779
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2941
09/08/92
$81.93
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1790781.,
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
2944
09/08/92
$320.36
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1790780
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
2943
09/08/92
$488.86
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1791570
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
2942
09/08/92
$63.37
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1794722
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3035
09/08/92
$244.95
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1794723
DISTRIBUTION .
REPAIR PARTS
3033
09/08/92
$124.65
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1794721
STREET RENOVAT.GENERAL
SUPPL
3034
09/08/92
$350.44
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1794720
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3032
09/08/92
$158.81
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1794719
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
3036
09/08/92
$138.73
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1797394
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3152
09/08/92
$172.42
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
1797393
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
3151
09/08/92
$124.71
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1797395
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
3152
09/08/92
$139.68
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
1797392
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
3150
09/08/92
$200.35
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1797391
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
2798
09/08/92
$176.79
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ACCESSORIES
1802838
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3261
< *>
$3,933.82*
129972
09/08/92
$11.00
LAWSON, ROBERT
LICENSES & PERMITS
082892
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$11.00*
129973
09/08/92
$24.47
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
073192
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
09/08/92
$28.99
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
073192
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
< *>
$53.46*
129974
09/08/92
$2,900.00
LEICESTER, ANDREW
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE M
081192
WORK. CAP. PRO
ACCTS REC MIS
<*>
$2,900.00*
129975
09/08/92
$613.44
LEITNER COMPANY
SOD & BLACK DIRT
080192
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
< *>
$613.44*
129976
09/08/92
$388.00
LETN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
82532.
POLICE DEPT. G.CONF
& SCHOOL
< *>
$388.00*
129977
09/08/92
$196.75
LIEN INFECTION CON
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
005904
GRILL
PROF SERVICES
9035
< *>
$196.75*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER. THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 17
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. N
129978
09/08/92.
$50.00'
LISI, JOAN
PERFORM ES
91092
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
129979
09/08/92
$4,700.00
LOFTHUS, DONALD S
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
081792
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,700.00*
129980
09/08/92
$4,411.48
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSI
.09/08/92
$2,636.38
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSI
09/08/92
$2,263.52
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSI
09/08/92
$112.30
LOGIS
DUE FROM HRA
079208/0
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
09/08/92
$322.11
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSI
09/08/92
$322.11
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSI
09/08/92
$322.11
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
079208/0
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$10,390.01*
129981
09/08/92
$113.13
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
153338
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3419
< *>
$113.13*
129982
09/08/92
$490.00
M AMUNDSON
COST OF -GOODS SOLD MI
14552
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$512.42
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14609
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$607.68
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14644
'YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
.$311.58
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14690
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$619.02
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14779
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$315.60
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14846
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$456.80
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14928
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$3,313.10*
129983
09/08/92
$494.16
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
BROOMS
26611
STREET CLEANIN
BROOMS
3249
09/08/92
$216.17
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
WEARING SHOES
26672
STREET CLEANIN
WEARING SHOES
3327
< *>
$710.33*
129984
09/08/92-
$75.00
MACTA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
083192
COMMUNICATIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$75.00*
129985
09/08/92
$26.00
MADDEN, JOHN
CLASS REFUND /ART CENT.08189.2
ART CENTER ADM
REGISTRATION
< *>
$26.00*
129986
09/08/92
$166.81
MAGNUSON SOD CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
073192
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
1373
09/08/92
$157.45
MAGNUSON SOD CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
073192
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$324.26*
129987
09/08/92
$59.50
MANICK, JANE
ART WORK SOLD .082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$59.50*
129988
09/08/92
$150.00
MARGL, LINDA J
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082792
FINANCE
CONF & SCHOOL
09/08/92
$79.24
MARGL, LINDA J
MILEAGE.OR ALLOWANCE
082792
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$229.24*
129989
09/08/92
$232.55
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$6,729.85
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$6,962.40*
129990
09/08/92
$531.87
MATRX MEDICAL INC
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
269397
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
2379
< *>
$531:87*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 18
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
129991
09/08/92
$74.55
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
7448.
BUILDING & GRO
TREES FLWR SH
09/08/92
$59.64
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
7476
BUILDING & GRO
TREES FLWR SH.
< *>
$134.19*
129992
09/08/92
$91.00
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
090192
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
< *>
$91.00*
129993
09/08/92
$78.60
MCGARVEY COFFEE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5121843
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
3667
< *>
$78.60*
129994
09/08/92
.$75.00
MCGIBBON,TERRY
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 12,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
129995
09/08/92
$107.37
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
080192/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$145.47
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
ACCESSORIES
080192 /P
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
09/08/9.2
$2,052.12
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
080192/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$2,304.96*
129996
09/08/92
$134.30
MCNEILUS STEEL
CONCRETE
0136060
STREET RENOVAT.CONCRETE
3333
< *>
$134.30*
129997
09/08/92
$953.18
MECO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2131801
GENERAL MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3227
09/08/92
$26.06
MECO
REPAIR PARTS
415955
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3243
< *>
$979.24*
129998
09/08/92
$20,428.85
MED CTR HEALTH PLAN
HOSPITALIZATION
082892
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$20,428.85*
129999
09/08/92
$26,430.60
MEDICA CHOICE
HOSPITALIZATION
082792
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$26,430.60*
130000
09/08/92
$86.20
MEDICARE - TRAVELERS
AMBULANCE FEES
083192
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$86.20*
130001
09/08/92
$100.00
MERFELD -BERT
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130002
09/08/92
$196.06
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
30669
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3129
09/08/92
$228.33
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
30701
DISTRIBUTION
PAINT
3132
09/08/92
$339.96
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30756
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3352
09/08/92
.$223.70
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30769
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
3339
09/08/92
$360.32
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30773
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPP
3369
09/08/92
$84.02
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL. SUPPLIES
30793
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3346
09/08/92
$253.47
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30794
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL.SUPPL
3347
09/08/92
$413.75
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30806
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
3402
09/08/92
$454.86
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30876
BUILDING & GRO
CLEANING SUPP
3557
09/08/92
$451.29
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30891
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3573
09/08/92
$495.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30917
CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPP
3582
< *>
$3.500.76*
130003
09/08/92
$78.68
MERWYN WALKER
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
082492
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
< *)
$78.68*
130004
09/08/92
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
327668
PLANNING
PROF SERVICES
3288
< *>
$35.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 19
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
130005
09/08/92
$244,847.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE METRO
50500992
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC MET
< *>
$244,847.00*
130006
09/08/92
$41.86
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
384622
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
9867
09/08/92
$210.74
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
080892
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9037
09/08/92
$227.51
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
081592
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9037
09/08/92
$11.54
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
082292
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
09/08/92
$111.08
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
082292
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$602.73*
130007
09/08/92
$71.50
MIDWAY IND SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
152650
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
3258
< *>
$71.50*
130008
09/08/92
$434.15
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
DUMPING CHARGES
1590
STREET RENOVAT
DUMPING CHARG
09/08/92
$688.23
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
REPAIR PARTS
8020
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$574.68
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR..
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8020
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$129.41
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR,
BLACKTOP
8020
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
09/08/92
$4,843.12
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8020
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
09/08/92
$435.42
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
DUMPING CHARGES
1626
STREET RENOVAT
DUMPING CHARG
09/08/92
$2,048.34
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8074
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
09/08/92
$1,946.93
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8074
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
09/08/92
$630.69
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8074
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
09/08/92
$97.08
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
DUMPING CHARGES
1680
STREET RENOVAT
DUMPING CHARG
09/08/92
09/'68t9?
$150.55
$569.12
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
MIDWEST ASPHALT GeR.
BLACKTOP
FILL MATERIALS
8143
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
?
$11,978.60*
28852
DIST-RiBuTieN
FILE MATERf*L
130009
09/08/92
$176.84
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
10477
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3624
09/08/92
- $102.90
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
10567
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$73.94*
130010
09/08/92
$238.58
MIDWEST SPORTS MKTG
GENERAL SUPPLIES
107033
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3198
< *>
$238.58*
130011
09/08/92
$63.00
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
082092
GRILL
CST OF GD F.00
2276
< *>
$63.00*
130012
09/08/92
$174.40
MILLERBERND
REPAIR PARTS
57,305
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
3330
< *>
$174.40*
130013
09/08/92
$386.18
MILLIPORE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
495907
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
3142
< *>
$386.18*
130014
09/08/92
569.53
MILWAUKEE TOOL CO.
TOOLS
25 -72 -94
GENERAL'MAINT
TOOLS
3223
< *>
$69.53*
130015
09/08/92
$15.16
MINN COMM PAGING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
080192
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$15.16*
130016
09/08/92
$9,194.74
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
082692
GOLF DOME
HEAT
09/08/92
$1,502.36
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
AUG 26,1
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
09/08/92
$47.13
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
09/08/92
$136.70
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
PW BUILDING
HEAT
09/08/92
$140.22
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
09/08/92
$20.96
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 20
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
_INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
130016
09/08/92
$97.44
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
09/08/92
$11.59
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
09/08/92
$235.92
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
09/08/92
$70.52
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
09/08/92
$633.36
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
09/08/92
$3.13
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
09/08/92
$17.83
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
09/08/92
812.94
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
09/08/92
$15.02
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
090892
CENTENNIAL LAK
HEAT
< *>
$12,139.86*
130017
09/08/92
$50.00
MINNESOTA FESTIVALS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
082492
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$50.00*
130018
09/08/92
$88.71
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQU
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2376
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
1255
< *>
$88.71*
130019
09/08/92
$1,540.00
MIRACLE RECREATION E
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
332185*
POOL CIP
CIP
<*>
-
$1,540.00*
130020
09/08/92
$21.55
MN DEPT OF HUMAN SER
AMBULANCE FEES
082692
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$21.55*
130021
09/08/92
$240.00
MN POLLUTION CONTROL
LICENSES & PERMITS
090192
GENERAL(BILLIN
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$240.00*
130022
09/08/92
$1,963.00
MN STATE TREA /BLG IN
BUILDING PERMITS
AUGUST
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$1,963.00*
130023
09/08/92
$15.41
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
6415
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
09/08/92
$24.45
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
6416
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$39.86*
130024
09/08/92
$420.37
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$420.37*
130025.09/08/92
$93.85
MN. ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
080412
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
3670
< *>
$93.85*
130026
09/08/92
$106.46
MN. GLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
69577
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3338
09/08/92
$57.03
MN. GLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
69603
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3399
< *>
$163.49*
.
130027
09/08/92
$52.13
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
283826
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3030
09/08/92
$50.18
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
286176
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3145
09/08/92
$25.99
MN. TORO INC.
ACCESSORIES
285955
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3138
09/08/92
$10.15
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
287100
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$61.33
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
287020
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3222
09/08/92
$83.03
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
288760
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3365
09/08/92
$221.21
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
288789
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3145
09/08/92
$25.56
MN. TORO INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
288848
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$62.09
MN. TORO INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
288847
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
2885
09/08/92
$166.57
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
289105
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3387
09/08/92
$216.15
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
289565
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3433
09/08/92
$283.41
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
289561
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3432
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 21
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION.
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130027
09%08/92
$165.00
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
MISC
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$1,422.80*
130028
09/08/92
$40.00
MN. WANNER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
15993
GENERAL STORM
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$66.20
MN. WANNER
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
0016133
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$42.00
MN. WANNER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
16121
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
<A>
x$148.20*
< *>
983-e@�
A.
- GONFEREN8E1s &- SSIIA9I= S-
x82192
P961GE DDEPT. ^
eeNF
130030
09/08/92
$382.42
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
150187
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1369
09/08/92
$308.73
MODEL, STONE
CONCRETE
150749
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/08/92
$296..40
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
150748
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/08/92
$320.74
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
150992
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1369
09/08/92
$382.42
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
150991
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
< *>
$1,690.71*
130031
09/08/92
$45.00
MOIR, BILLIE D
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
083192
POLICE.DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$45.00*
130032
09/08/92
$4.42
MONARCH.MARKETING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
389727
50TH ST SELLIN
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$4.42*
130033
09/08/92
$3,407.35
MOTOROLA INC
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
090192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
< *>
$3,407.35*
130034
09/08/92
$45.00
MOTT, LUCY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311580
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3008
09/08/92
$45.00
MOTT. LUCY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311582
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3010
< *>
$90.00*
130035
09/08/92
$8,316.91
MPLS FINANCE DEPARTM
WATER PURCHASED
081492
DISTRIBUTION
WATER PURCHAS
< *>
$8,316.91*
130036
09/08/92
$1,067.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030360
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3,453
09/08/92
$560.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030357
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3453
09/08/92
$2,016.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030358
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
3392
09/08/92
$385.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030362
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3462
< *>
$4,028.00*
130037
09/08/92
$158.98
MTS NW SOUND.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
105416
SWIMMING INSTR
GENERAL SUPPL
3319
09/08/92
$91.70
MTS NW SOUND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
106081
SWIMMING INSTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$250.68*
130038
09/08/92
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO.
ACCESSORIES
3925
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3323
09/08/92
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
3926
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3324
< *>
$107.00*
130039
09/08/92
$193.40
MURRAY SANDLER SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8531
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3500
< *>
$193.40*
130040
09/08/92
$47.80
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
081992/5
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
09/08/92
$47.80
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
081992 5
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
09/08/92
510.00
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
090192
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$105.60*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 22
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130041
09/08/92
$90.00
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF C
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
P00428
CENT.SVC GENER
ADVERT
PERSON
< *>
$90.00*
130042
09/08/92
$19.00
NATIONAL SAFETY COUN
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
I- 556051
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES &
SUBSCR
3293
< *>
$19.00*
130043
09/08/92
$127.75
NATL CAMERA EXCH.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10274638
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL
SUPPL
3452
< *>
$127.75*
130044
09/08/92
$511.00
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
558956
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF
GD F00
3715
09/08/92
$53.06
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
560109
ARENA CONCESSI
CONTR
REPAIRS
3502
09/08/92
$45.51
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
562211
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF
GD F00
3715
09/08/92
$221.45
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
081592
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF
GD F00
< *>
$831.02"
130045
09/08/92
$31.50
NELSON, SUZANNE
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL
SALES
< *>
$31.50*
130046
09/08/92
$79.52
NEVCO SCOREBOARD COM
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
107583
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR
REPAIRS
3384
< *>
579.52*
130047
09/08/92
$476.90
NEW PIG CORPORATION
BLUE PRINTING
855012
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BLUE PRINTING
2376
< *>
$476.90*
130048
09/08/92
$96.80
NICKLOW, LIA
PT MAINT AC
090292
ART CENTER BLD
SALARIES
TEMP
c *>
$96.80*
130049
09/08/92
$100.00
NISSEN DICK
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130050
09/08/92
$62.43
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS -
487090
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3439
09/08/92
$94.10
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
486900
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3437
09/08/92
$67.41
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
488240
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3440
: *>
$223.94*
130051
09/08/92
$619.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF.GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
< *>
$619.20*
130052
09/08/92
.$150.00
NORTHWEST TENNIS ASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
081792
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL
SUPPL
< *>
$150.00*
130053
09/08/92
$843.46
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
073092
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
< *>
$843.46*
130055
09/08/92
$154.89
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
081092
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$7..03
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
081092
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$1,127.58
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
GENERAL MAINT
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$20,953.65
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$3,007.88
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$3,722.11
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
TRAFFIC SIGNAL.LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$386.11
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$42.56
NSP
LIGHT -& POWER
090892
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
& POWER
.09/08/92
$2,970.49
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$1,209.26
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
& POWER
09/08/92
$50.55
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090892
CIVIL DEFENSE .
LIGHT
& POWER
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 23
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
w^
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE.
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 0
w
130055
09/08/9 2
$2,155
85
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$2,561.12
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
PW BUILDING
LIGHT &.POWER
09/08/92
$695.55
NSP
LIGHT&
POWER
090892
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$5,755.71
NSP.
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$3,278.34
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$596.77
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$1,711.28
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$9,628.47
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92.
$252.71
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
GUN RANGE
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$1,119.93
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$26,185.56
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$839.87
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$1,285.64
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$663..33
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$636.53
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
GOLF DOME
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
$7,344:34
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
BUILDING & GRO
LIGHT & POWER
09/08/92
51,144.55
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
090892
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT & POWER
< *>
899,487.66*
130056
09/08/92
$30.00
NTCC
REPAIR PARTS
4100576
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3226
< *>
$30.00*
130057
09/08/92
5146.56
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
198526
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
3268
< *>
$146.56*
130058
09/08/92
$100.00
NYHLINS FILTER RECYC
HAZ. WASTE
DISPOSAL
8946
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE.DI
3403
< *>
$100.00*
130059
09/08/92
$288:18
NYSTROM PUBLISHING
PRINTING
10420D
SPECIAL ACTIVI.PRINTING
< *>
$288.18*
130060
09/08/92
$254.54
OFFICE FURNITURE WAR
EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT
WS -5702
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
< *>
$254.54*
130061
09/08/92
$487.77
OFFICE PRODUCTS
EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT
175235
-ENGINEERING GE
EQUIP REPLACE
3656
< *>
$487.77*
130062
09/08/92
$215.00
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32398
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
3067
< *>
$215.00*
130063
09/08/92
$900.00
OLD DOMINION BRUSH
BROOMS
09446 -42
STREET CLEANIN
BROOMS
3238 .
< *>
$900.00*
130064
09/08/92
$238.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD F_0
8280
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
9629
09/08/92
574.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD O
F
8531
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9041
09/08/92
437.00
O.TIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
8690
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD FOO
09/08/92
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
8663
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
9041
09/08/92
$77.50
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD FO
082892
GRILL
CST OF GO F00
9041
< *>
$500.50*
130065
09/08/92
$125.49
OZALID CORP
BLUE PRINTING
DR 37759
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
3092
< *>
$125.49*
130066
09/08/92
$1,278.00
PARKWAY TREE SERVICE
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
082692
TREE 6 YR
CIP
< *>
$1,278..00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 24
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130067
09/08/92
$39.42
PAULSON, MOLLIE"
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$39.42*
130068
09/08/92
$27.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
25713
50TH ST. SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$180.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
25734
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS-BE
09/08/92
$27.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
25734
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
- $13.25
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
252982
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
< *>
$221.75*
130069
09/08/92
$99.00
PC TAILORS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
053092
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$198.00
PC TAILORS
SERVICE CONTRACTS
EQU
053092
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$297.00*
130070
09/08/92
$226.10
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$226.10*
130071
09/08/92
$95.32
PILGRIM CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
082492
POOL OPERATION
LAUNDRY
< *>
$95.32*
130072
09/08/92
$29.90
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
439385
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
09/08/92
$29.90
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
452751
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$59.80*
130073
09/08/92
$5,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
081992
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$5,000.00*
130074
09/08/92
$7,997.99
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
082592
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$7,997.99*
130075
09/08/92
$239.70
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
SOD & BLACK DIRT
001822
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
3216
09/08/92
$21.90
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
SERVICE CONTRACTS
EQU
001858
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
09/08/92
$75.90
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1942
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3589
< *>
$337.50*
130076
09/08/92
$19.00
PRENTICE HALL PROFES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
581514
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
.$19.00*
130077
09/08/92
$81.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
75838
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$81.00*
130078
09/08/92
$572.84
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
072392
STREET RENOVAT
SAND,GRVL & R
1341
< *>
$572.84*
130079
09/08/92
$27.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
596058
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
09/08/92
$75.73
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
599316
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
$86.62
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
598564
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$189.75*
130080
09/08/92
$1,600.00
PROFESSIONAL EEO CON
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
92081 -TR
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
< *>
$1,600.00*
130081
09/08/92
$145.00
QUALITY REFRIG
SERVICE CONTRACTS
EQU
112042
GRILL
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$145.00*
130082
09/08/92
$4.03
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
89228
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3321
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP.
3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 25
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130082
09/08/92
$126.27
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
16499
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3248
09/08/92
$84.09
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
17640
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3409
09/08/92
$64.41
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
18278
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3020
09/08/92
$79.49
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
18553
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3480
09/08/92
$147.80
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
18634
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3484
< *>
$506.09*
130083
09/08/92
$2,000.00
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
016584
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3199
09/08/92
$157.62
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
016619
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3372
< *>
$2,157.62*
130084
09/08/92
$33.36
REM SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD F0.01811
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD.F00
3430
09/08/92
$300.25
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01813
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3474
09/08/92
$90.10
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01818
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3602
09/08/92
$52.91
REM. SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01819
CENTENNIAL LAK,GENERAL
SUPPL
3671
09/08/92
$230.36
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01832
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
3764
< *>
$706.98*
130085
09/08/92
$7.52
RETAIL DATA SYS MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12599
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL
3597
< *>
$7.52*
130086
09/08/92
$8,294.05
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$8,294.05*
130087
09/08/92
$50.00
RHINESTONE ROCKETTES
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 13,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *i
$50.00*
.
130088
09/08/92
$130.45
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6530
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$130.45*
130089
09/08/92
$153.38
RIEDELL SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
75183
BUILDING & GRG
GENERAL SUPPL
3600
< *>
$153:38*
130090
09/08/92
$90.00
RIFFEY, JANE.
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292.,
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$17.15
RIFFEY. JANE
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$107.15*
130091
09/08/92
$124.64
RINGS & THINGS
CRAFT SUPPLIES
107069
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
320
< *>
$124.64*
130092
09/08/92
$136.79
RITEWAY
REPAIR PARTS
117187 -M
EQUIPMENT.OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2625
< *>
$136.79*
130093
09/08/92
$11.17
RITZ CAMERA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3756327
ENGINEERING.GE
GENERAL SUPPL
3448
< *>
$11.17*
130094
09/08/92
$21.19
ROAD RESCUE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
129959
FIRE DEPT..GEN
FIRST AID SUP
2378
< *>
$21.19*
130095
09/08/92
$77.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
69951
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3511
< *>
577.00*
130096
09/08/92
$100.00
ROBERTS, RALPH
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 13,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP. 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 26
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130097
09/08/92
$458.73
ROLLINS OIL CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
34437
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3188
09/08/92
$4,910.98
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
1304
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
3481
09/08/92
$1,387.03
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
1305
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
3481
09/08/92
$1,094.71
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
1302
MAINT OF COURS
GASOLINE
9379
< *>
$7,851.45*
130098
09/08/92
$61.87
ROSE BURNS CATERING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5324
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$61.87*
130099
09/08/92
$45.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$120.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
PT AC MAINT
090292
ART CENTER BLD
SALARIES TEMP
09/08/92
$21.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$186.00*
130100
09/08/92
$331.60
RUTGERS BAY LAKE LOD
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
083192
CIVIL DEFENSE
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$331.60*
130101
09/08/92
$6.00
SAFETY KLEEN
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
439132/
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
09/08/92
$64.17
SAFETY KLEEN
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
532867
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
< *>
$70.17*
130102
09/08/92
$90.81
SCHAFER EQUIP CO
ACCESSORIES
163368
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3331
< *>
$90.81*
130103
09/08/92
$310.00
SCHIRMANG, JOHN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
081592
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
09/08/92
$137.74
SCHIRMANG, JOHN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082092
INSPECTIONS.
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$447.74*
130104
09/08/92
$344.50
SCHIRMANG, KAREN
SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYE
081192
INSPECTIONS
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
$344.50*
130105
09/08/92
$31.50
SCHMECHEL, JANE
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
09/08/92
$132.00
SCHMECHEL, JANE
PT OFFICE AC
090292
ART CENTER ADM
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
$163.50*
130106
09/08/92
$25.68
SCHMITT MUSIC
MUSIC SUPPLIES
917444
SPECIAL.ACTIVI
MUSIC SUPPLIE
< *>
$25.68*
130107
09/08/92
$285.36
SEARS
TOOLS
SR -75 -36
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
3570
< *>
$285.36*
130108
09/08/92
$25.02
SEARS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ID -62 -26
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$25.02*
130109
09/08/92
5100.00
SHEPARD JOHN
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100:00*
130110
09/08/92
$170.55
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GUARD RAIL MATERIAL
071592
BRIDGES GUARD
GUARD RAIL MA
2929
09/08/92
$190.50
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0321 -3
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPL
3061
09/08/92
$251.72
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0366 -8
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPL
2850
< *>
$612.77*
130111
09/08/92
$304..66
SHIRLEY, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090192
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$304.66*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 27
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
- - - -
OBJECT
----------------------------
P.O. #
-----------------------------------------
130112
09/08/92
$11.00
-----------------------------------------------------------
SIEMS, JEFFERY
LICENSES & PERMITS
082492
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIC & PERMI.TS
< *>
$11.00*
130113
09/08/92
$157.05
SIITARI, MICHAEL
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
082592
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$157.05*
130114
09/08/92
$4.26
SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
126109
FIRE DEPT.'. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
1673
< *>
$4.26*
130115
09/08/92
$94.11
SNYDER, MICHAEL
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
082492
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
594.11*
130116
09/08/92
SOFTWARE ETC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01166911
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
3128
<* >V�
�$7799_.�511
130117
09/08/92
$19.17
SOKKIA MEASURING SYS
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
103191
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
2997
< *>
$19.17*
130118
09/08
$14.62
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
1912956
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3161
-/92
09/08/92
$29.35
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
1919946
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR .PARTS
3454
09/08/92
$49.*
53
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
1921830
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3475
09/08/92
- $24.30
SPS
DUP PYMT REF 083810
1851687/
EQUIPMENT -OPER
REPAIR PARTS .
< *>
.$69.20*
130119
09/08/92
$346.13
ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMEN
COMMODITIES
SM00013
EQUIPMENT OPER
COMMODITIES
2413
< *>
$346.13*
130120
09/08/92
$10.00
ST PAUL NEIGHBORHOOD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
082492
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$10.00*
130121-09/08/92
$13,442.40
STAN MORGAN & ASSOCI
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
39147
LIQUOR PROD
MACH. & EQUI.P
2892
< *>
$13,442.40*
130122
09/08/92
$35.00.
STATE BOARD OF ELECT
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082092
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$35.00*
130123
09/08/92
$94.60
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
073192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$94:60*
130124
09/08/92
$211.95
STREICHERS
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
52481.2
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF: ALLOW
3202
09/08/92
$250.28
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
52500.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
3285
09/08/92
$344.94
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
52981.1
POLICE DEPT. G.AMMUNITION
3493
< *>
$807.17*
130125
09/08/92
$35.20
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171320
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$27.35
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171388
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
- $27.35
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171411
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$27.19
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171422
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$285.18
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171509
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$55.13
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171637
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$42.76
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171725
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$205.50
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
145324
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
09/08/92
$38.74
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
171957
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$176.14
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
172018
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP
3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 28
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
< *>
$865.84*
130126
09/08/92
$307.67
SUBURBAN PROPANE
GASOLINE
081792
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
< *>
$307.67*
130127
09/08/92
$7.74
SUPERIOR FORD
REPAIR PARTS
156606
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
8155
09/08/92
$27.80
SUPERIOR FORD
REPAIR PARTS
157094
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR.PARTS
3245
< *>
$35.54*
130128
09/08/92
$72.00
SUSAN FRAME
PT OFFICE /ART CENTER
090292
ART CENTER ADM
SALARIES TEMP
09/08/92
$56.00
SUSAN FRAME
ART WORK SOLD
090292
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
09/08/92
$285.00
SUSAN FRAME
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$413.00*
130129
09/08/92
$5,251.24
SW SUB CABLE COMM
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
082792
COMMUNICATIONS
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$5,251.24*
130130
09/08/92
$100.00
SWANSON HAROLD
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE,PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130131
09/08/92
$99.55
TARGET
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
082892
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
09/08/92
$115.97
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
083192
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$215.52*
130132
09/08/92
$85.23
TECHNICAL INFORMATIO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
6378
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
6378
< *>
$85.23*
130133
09/08/92
$466.47
TERRY ANN SALES CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1261
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
3277
< *>
$466.47*
130134
09/08/92
$77.70
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4067222
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
09/08/92
$66.06
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4198013
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
3603
09/08/92
$77.70
THE KANE.SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4223314
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$221.46*
130135
09/08/92
$300.29
THE MATHISON CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
734482
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3265
< *>
$300.29*
130136
09/08/92
$1,597.50
THE TREE STUMP COMPA
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081492
TREE 6 YR
CIP
< *>
$1,597.50*
130137
09/08/92
$327.58
THERMOSTATIC INDUSTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19676
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
2374
< *>
$327.58*
130138
09/08/92
$360.00
THOMPSON, WALTER
AMBULANCE FEES
082492
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$360.00*
130139
09/08/92
$243.80
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/08/92
511,732.75
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$11,976.55*
130140
09/08/92
$118.71
TIME LIFE MUSIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
081192
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$118.71*
130141
09/08/92
$59.50
TODD UNIFORMS INC
LAUNDRY
555867
BUILDING & GRO
LAUNDRY
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 29
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
--------------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------------=----------------------------------
< *>
$59.50*
130142
09/08/92
$10.20
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
109116
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3.158
09/08/92
$117.81
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
446890
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPL
09/08/92
$23.77
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
190200
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3326
09/08/92.
$79.88
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
190590
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3348
< *>
$231.66*
130143
09/08/92
$175.00
TOM PRIN TRIO
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
SEPT 21,
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$175.00*
130144
09/08/92
$724.20
TOP NOTCH TREECARE
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
082092
TREE 3 YR
CIP
< *>
$724.20*
130145
09/08/92
$475.00
TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE
REPAIR PARTS
2463
PATHS & HARD S
REPAIR PARTS
3335
< *>
$475.00*
130146
09/08/92
$65.27
TRIANGLE PRINTING CO
PRINTING
153001
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
3267
< *>
$65.27*
130147
09/08/92
$58.22
TROGE, DOUG
REPAIR PARTS
090192
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$58.22*
130148
09/08/92
$46.00
TROPHY WORLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
9327
TENNIS INSTRUC
GENERAL SUPPL
3370
< *>
$46.00*
130149
09/08/92
$416.67
TROY CHEMICALS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
4584
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
3187
< *>
$416.67*
130150
09/08/92
$25.20
TURNBLADH, CY
ART WORK SOLD
082792
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$25.20"
130151
09/08/92
$63.58
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
JULY VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$63.58*
130152
09/08/92
- $65.26
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
081292
RESERVE PROGRA
UNIF ALLOW
09/08/92
$496.44
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
081292
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
09/08/92
$5.99
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
373109
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$437.17*
130153
09/08/92
- $868.00
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
92880700
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$73.69
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
18541300
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2629
09/08/92
$395.92
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
18729200
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
2802
09/08/92
-$37.21
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
92918800
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
09/08/92
$161.55
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
18840700
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
2927
09/08/92
$72.49
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
18881700
PW BUILDING -
REPAIR PARTS
2948
09/08/92
$19.80
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
18396901
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REPAIR PARTS
2438
09/08/92
$80.72
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18971600
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
3041
09/08/92
$16.98
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
19042500
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
3036
09/08/92
$60.57
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
19042900
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3036
09/08/92
$79.61
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
19318300
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3393.
09/08/92
$1,112.35
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
93024500
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
2639
<*>
$1,168.47*
130154
09/08/92
$75.66
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
772161
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
8899
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page .30
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
< *>
$75.66*
130155
09/08/92
$69.48
US WEST
CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
080192
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$97.87
US WEST
CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
080192
BUILDING & GRO
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$25.60
US WEST
CELLULAR
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
081092
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$192.95*
130156
09/08/92
$50.43
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$430.32
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$111.51
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$183.64
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090.892
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$58.33
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$139.58
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
GOLF DOME
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$1;244.59
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
BUILDING & GRO
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$331.41
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$152.26
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$168.24
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
09/08/92
$206.84
US WEST
COMM.
TELEPHONE
090892
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE.
< *>
$3,077.15*
130157
09/08/92
$209.00
US WEST
MARKETING RE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00109013
CIVIL DEFENSE
GENERAL SUPPL
2995
09/08/92
$249.00
US WEST
MARKETING RE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
080892
CIVIL DEFENSE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$458.00*
130158
09/08/92
$43.90
US WEST
PAGING
TELEPHONE
9008282
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
3636
< *>
$43.90*
130159
09/08/92
$181.03
VAN 0 LITE
INC
REPAIR PARTS
42313
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3404
09/08/92
$90.76
VAN 0 LITE
INC
ACCESSORIES
42443
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3236
09/08/92
$112.90
VAN 0 LITE
INC
ACCESSORIES
42587
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3328
< *>
$384.69*
130160
09/08/92
$563.41
VANTAGE
ELECTRIC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
12169
PARKS
CIP
3529
09/08/92
$342.84
VANTAGE
ELECTRIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12200
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPL
3531
09/08/92
$69.71
VANTAGE
ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12210
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3569
09/08/92
$975.00
VANTAGE
ELECTRIC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12217
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
3349
< *>
$1,950.96*
130161
09/08/92
$18.68
VEITH,
MICHELLE
PRINTING
082192
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PRINTING
< *>
$18.68*
130162
09/08/92
$494.00
VERSATILE
VEHICLE
LEASE LINES
07764
GOLF CARS
LEASE LINES
3278
09/08/92
$286.00
VERSATILE
VEHICLE
LEASE LINES
07815
GOLF CARS
LEASE LINES
3584
< *>
$780.00*
130163
09/08/92
$183.73
VESSCO
REPAIR PARTS
1950
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
3476
< *>
$183.73*
130164
09/08/92
$415.00
VICTORSEN,
FOLKE R 0
AMBULANCE FEES
082492
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$415.00*
130165
09/08/92
$120.20
VINCENT
METALS
REPAIR PARTS
96129
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9471
< *>
$120.20*
130166
09/08/92
$990.71
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
207667
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2260
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:41 PM
page 31
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130166
09/08/92
566.46
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
209185
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3054
09/08/92
$466.47
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
209408
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
3140
09/08/92
$23.00
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
209695
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2439
< *>
$1;546.64"
130167
09/08/92
$223.37
W W GRAINGER
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
498 -6510
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
3147
09/08/9.2
$165.29
W.W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
80 -646 -3
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3385
< *>
$388.66*
130168
09/08/92
$162.38
W.W. GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
495 -2670
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
3592
< *>
$162:38*
130169
09/08/92
$100.00
WALSH WILLIAM
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130170
09/08/92.
$230.04.
WATER PRO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
376106
GENERAL SUPPL
3531
<*>
$230.04*
-
.DISTRIBUTION
-
130171
09/0,8/92
$225.00
WEINBERGER, ADRIENNE
AC INSTRUCTOR
090292
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$225.00*
130172
09/08/92
$475.00
WENDY ANDERSON ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
081392
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$475.00*
130173
09/08/92
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311575
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3006.
09/08/92
$135.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311579
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3007
09/08/92
$45.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311581
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3009
< *>
$270.00*
130174
09/08/92
$16.70
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
69377
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
09/08/92
$476.32
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
76795
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
3561
< *>
$493.02*
130175
09/08/92
$20.00
WESTPHAL,ANITA
MILEAGE LOGIS
081792
FINANCE
MILEAGE
<*>
$20.00*
- -
-
1.30176
09/08/92
$135.04
WILLIAMS STEEL
PAINT
432475 -0
DISTRIBUTION
PAINT
3242
< *>
$135.04*
130177
09/08/92
$45.00
WINE SPECTATOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
080392
VERNON SELLING
CST. OF GDS MI
< *>
$45.00*
130178
09/08/92
$17.04
WM H MCCOY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
176801
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
2872
09/08/92
$14.91
WM H MCCOY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
175774
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
2934
09/08/92
$17.04
WM H MCCOY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
177755
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
3043
< *>
$48.99*
130179
09/08/92
$100.00
WROBLESKI -HENRY
PERSONAL SERVICES
SEPTEMBE
RESERVE'PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130180
09/08/92
$807.18
XEROX CORP
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
03423842
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP, RENTAL
< *>
$807.18*
130181
09/08/92
$54.58
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
54186184
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
3678
09/08/92
$90.87
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
54186180
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3672
'
`
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, 3[P 3. 1992. 9:41 PM page 32
CHECK0 DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 0
--__-,-_________-_______________-____________--______-________________-_
$145.45^
130182 08/08/82 $40.00 ZVHRAH MERRIMAK[RS SERVICES EDINBoRDUGH SEPT 10. ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER
$40.00^
$965,810'12*
/
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, SEP 3, 1992, 9:45 PM
page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
$471,074.06
FUND
#
12
$6,417.82
FUND
#
15
$12,293.87
FUND
#
23
$8,909.47
FUND
#
26
$5,307.75
FUND
#
27
$37,759.18
FUND
#
28
$18,422.58
FUND
#
29
$340.04
FUND
#
30
$22,892.45
FUND
#
40
$310,599.60
FUND
#
41
$5,518.87
FUND
#
50
$65,192.76
FUND
#
60
$1,081.67
$965,810.12*
r •. +
.
_
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
BY CHECK
NUMBER FRI,
AUG 14,
1992, 9:42 PM
page 1
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123144
07/021-92
$86,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
070292
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
07/02/92
- $86,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
070292
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
123145
07/06/92
$57.00
UNIVERSITY OF
MN
CONT ED
71451 06
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$57.00*
123146
07/06/92
$7,000.00
UNIVERSITY OF
MN
CANADA GOOSE MGMT
06635019
MAINT OF COURS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$7,000.00*
123147
07/06/92
$769.50
TMI COATINGS
INC
CONSTRUCTION
070692
POOL CIP
CIP
< *>
$769.50*
123148
07/06/92
$44,935.00
ASSOCIATED POOL BUIL
CONSTRUCTION
AUG S. 1
POOL CIP
CIP
2108
07/06/92
$12,635.00
ASSOCIATED POOL BUIL
CONSTRUCTION
AUG 5, 1
POOL CIP
CIP
2108
< *>
$57,570.00*
123149
07/06/92
$281.67
PLANT EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
14285 06
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2108
< *>
$281.67*
123150
07/07/92
$28,769.34
PERA
PERA
070792
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
<*>
$28,769.34*
123151
07/07/92
$19.62
PERA
PERA
070792
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
< *>
$19.62*
123152
07/07/92
$18,668.97
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
070792
CENT SVC GENER
SOCIAL SECURI
07/07/92
$4,891.38
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
070792
CENT SVC GENER
MEDICARE
< *>
$23,560.35*
123153
08/12/92
$438.75
BELLBOY CORPORATION
LI19920720
32252
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
< *>
$438.75*
123154
07/07/92
$665.65
EAGLE WINE
WINE
581559
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
07/07/92
-$6.66
EAGLE WINE
WINE /DISCOUNT
581558
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
07/07/92
$1,232.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19920720
581558
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
07/07/92
- $12.33
EAGLE WINE
LI19920720
581558
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
07/07/92
$242.89
EAGLE WINE
LI19920720
581560
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
07/07/92
-$2.43
EAGLE WINE
LI19920720
581560
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$2,119.92*
123155
08/12/92
$1,027.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11049
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,005.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11225
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$395.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11083
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$924.79
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11048
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $18.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11048
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$299.48
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920720
11226
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.99
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11226
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$417.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11094
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,346.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11260
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$980.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11050
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $19.62
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11050
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,341.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11066
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$274.98
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11748
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920720
11748
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
page 2
------------7-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123155 08/12/92 $
$54.49 E
ED P
PHILLIPS &
& S
SONS L
LI19920720 1
11224 5
50TH S
ST S
SELLIN C
CST O
OF G
GD L
LIQ L
LI0812
08/12/92 -
-$1.09 E
ED P
PHILLIPS &
& S
SONS L
LI19920720 1
11224 5
50TH S
ST S
SELLIN C
CASH D
DISCOUNT L
LI0812
08/12/92 $
$242.15 E
ED P
PHILLIPS &
& S
SONS L
LI19920720 1
11657 5
50TH S
ST S
SELLIN C
CST O
OF G
GD W
WIN L
LI0812
08/12/92 $
$438.05 E
ED P
PHILLIPS &
& S
SONS L
LI19920720 1
11749 5
50TH S
ST S
SELLIN C
CST O
OF G
GD W
WIN L
LID812
08/12/92 $
$639.95 E
ED P
PHILLIPS &
& S
SONS L
LI19920720 1
11223 5
50TH S
ST S
SELLIN C
CST O
OF G
GD W
WIN L
LI0812
$9,338.09*
123156 08/12/92 $4,307.22 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581853
08/12/92 - $86.14 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581853
08/12/92 $838.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581854
08/12/92 - $16.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581854
08/12/92 $1,204.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581855
08/12/92 - $24.08 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581855
08/12/92 $4,821.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581856
08/12/92 - $96.42 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581856
08/12/92 $1,647.11 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581857
08/12/92 - $32.94 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920720 581857
0) $12,56.1.81*
123157 08/12/92 $142.62 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434673
08/12/92 $3.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434673
08/12/92 -$1.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434673
08/12/92 $1,385.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434657
08/12/92 $7.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434657
08/12/92 - $27.71 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434657
08/12/92 $1,461.32 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434640
08/12/92 $15.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434640
08/12/92 - $14.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434640
08/12/92 $136.19 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434665
08/12/92 $4.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434665
08/12/92 -$1.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434665
08/12/92 $280.24 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434715
08/12/92 $2.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434715
08112192 -$2.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434715
08/12/92 $629.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434681
08/12/92 $7.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434681
08/12/92 -$6.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434681
08/12/92 $1,954.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434699
08/12/92 $12:50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434699
08/12/92 - $39.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434699
08/12/92 $3,540.32 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434707
08/12/92 $21.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434707
08/12/92 - $70.83 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434707
08/12/92 $266.03 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434723
08/12/92 $8.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434723
08/12/92 -$2.68 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434723
08/12/92 $492.26 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434731
08/12/92 $9.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434731
08/12/92 -$4.92 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434731
08/12/92 $3,585.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434608
08/12/92 $19.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920.721 7434608
08/12/92 - $71.72 JOHNSON WINE'CO. LI19920721 7434608
08/12/92 -$2.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7402100
08/12/92 $616.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434624
08/12/92 $12.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920721 7434624
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING_
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST .SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
L10812
LI0812
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING_
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST .SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
L10812
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
page 3
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123157
08/12/92
-$6.16
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434624
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$304.80
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
743416
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$9.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
743416
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.05
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
743416
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,413.18
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434582
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$11.25
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434582
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $14.15
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434582
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$2,064.34
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434590
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$14.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434590
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $41.27
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920721
7434590
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$18,118.78*
123158
08/12/92
$45.00
MN WINEGROWERS COOPE
LI19920721
2369
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$0.75
MN WINEGROWERS COOPE
LI19920721
2369
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$45.75*
123159
08/12/92
$552.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920721
24720
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$13.60
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920721
24720
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $74.95
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920721
CM626
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$218.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920721
24810
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$6.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920721
24810
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$715.95*
123160
08/12/92
$758.26
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581083
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.58
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581083
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LID812
08/12/92
$761.28
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581086
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.61
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581086
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$439.83
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581084
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$4.67
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920721
581084
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$1,939.51*
123161
08/12/92
$5,859.18
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7382
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
.-$117.18
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7382
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$46.95
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7391
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.47
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7391
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$4,153.61
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7393
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $83.07
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7393
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,172.28
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7398
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $23.45
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7398
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$571.50
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7421
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $11.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7421
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,063.11
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7603
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.63
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7603
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,226.65
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7619
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $12.27
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7619
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,714.72
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7630
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $17.15
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7630
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$451.44
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7845
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$9.03
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920720
7845
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
<*>
$15,974.76*
123162
08/12/92
$122.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19920721
2834
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$2.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19920721
2834
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0812
< *>
$124.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER FRI. AUG 14. 1992. 9:42 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123163
08/12/92
$120.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19920721
10621
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$156.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19920721
13464
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$278.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19920721
13457
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
<*>
$554.00*
123164
08/12/92
$616.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583330
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$6.17
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583330
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$206.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583331
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583331
50TH ST SELLIN.
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$618.44
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583332
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
756.18
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583332
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$90.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583629
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
583629
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$77.25
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721
584764
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.77
EAGLE WINE
LI19920721,
584764
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$1,592.60*
123165
08/12/92
$1,700.09
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $34.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$5,414.94
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
7$108.30
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
- $1,700.09
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$34.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LID812
08/12/92
- $5,414.94
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$108.30
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$513.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13055
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$370.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13293
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$70.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13294
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13294
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$531.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13292
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$261.82
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13291
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.24
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13291
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$637.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13253
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$227.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13254
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$258.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13220
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$82.11
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13255
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.64
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13255
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$527.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13252
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.54
ED PHILLIPS, &
SONS
LI19920721
13252
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$649.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13118
YORK SELLING "
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$723.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13257
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$184.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13010
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$505.68
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13117
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.11
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13117
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$422.22
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13256
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$8.44
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
13256
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
- $42.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920721
137035
VERNON SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUN
LI0812
< *>
$5,883.61*
123166
08/12/92
$1,700.09
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF'GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $34.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584734
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$5,414.94
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $108.30
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584735
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$184.11
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721-
584736
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.68
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920721
584736
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
w 0
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O.
page 5
---------------------------------------------------,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123166 08/12/92 $3,986.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920721 584737 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
08/12/92 - $79.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920721 584737 ' YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
08/12/92 - $41.05 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920721 64841 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUN LI0812
< *> $11,018.70*
123167 08/12/92
$121.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7457916
08/12/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7457916
08/12/92
-$1.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7457916
08/12/92
$2,503.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
- $24.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
- $2,503.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
$24.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
$2,489.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
$14.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
- $24.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460215
08/12/92
$428.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460223
08/12/92
$5.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460223
08/12/92
-$4.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460223
08/12/92
$203.93
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460256
08/12/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460256
08/12/92
-$2.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460256
08/12/92
$353.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460264
08/12/92
$9.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460264
08/12/92
-$3.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460264
08/12/92
$393.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460272
08/12/92
- $8.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460272
08/12/92
-$3.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460272
08/12/92
$1,582.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460231
08/12/92
$11.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460231
08/12/92
- $31.65
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460231
08/12/92
$3,717.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460249
08/12/92
$18.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460249
08/12/92
- $74.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460249
08/12/92
$2,820.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
$12.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
- $56.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
- $2,820.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
- $12.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
$56.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
$2,820.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
$12.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
- $56.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460116
08/12/92
$222.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460090
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460090
08/12/92
-$2.23
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460090
08/12/92
$248.43
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460082
08/12/92
$2.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460082
08/12/92
-$2.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460082
08/12/92
$31.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460124
08/12/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE'CO.
LI19920721
7460124
08/12/92
-$0.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460124
08/12/92
$548.65
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460132
08/12/92
$10.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460132
08/12/92
=$5.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460132
08/12/92
$906.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460108
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK- SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD W.IN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST.OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GO WIN
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
LIC812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
FRI,
AUG 14.
1992, 9:42 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
----'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123167
08/12/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460108
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $18.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460108
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$368.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460165
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460165
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LID812
08/12/92
-$3.71
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460165
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$628.17
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460157
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460157
.50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$6.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460157
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$71.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460199
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460199
50TH
ST_SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460199
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$90.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460207
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460207
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LID812
08/12/92
-$0.91
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460207
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LID812
08/12/92
$1,980.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460181
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$9.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460181
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $39.61
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460181
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,347.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460173
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7460173
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $26.94
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
"'7460173
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
- $128.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7430663
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-58.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7430655
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $29.41
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920721
7410616
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$9.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920721
1444785
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$18,204.37*
123168
08/12/92
$49.75
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583269
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.50
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583269
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$198.80
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583304
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.99
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583304
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$348.18
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583305
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812•
08/12/92
-$3.48
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583305
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$498.84
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583306
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$4.99
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19920721
583306
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$1,084.61*
123169
08/12/92
$2,770.92
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
8584
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $55.42
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
8584
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,062.77
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9044
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.63
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9044
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$651.81
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9293
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $13.04
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9293
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$3,090.80
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
$555
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $61.82
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
8555
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$4,024.51
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
8585
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $80.49
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
8585
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$752.23
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9061
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92.
-$7.52
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9061
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT_LI0812
08/12/92
$468.09
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9067
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $4 -.68
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9067
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,683.96
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9092
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $33.68
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9092
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,760.84
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9096
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $35.22
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9096
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$116.08
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920721
9294
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
s
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
BY CHECK
NUMBER FRI,
AUG 14,
1992, 9:42 PM
page 7
CHECK#
- - - - --
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123169
08/12/92
-$2.32
QUALITY WINE
LI19920721
9294
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$16,077.19*
123170
07/17/92
$106,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
071792
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
07/17/92
- $106,000.00
CITY OF'EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
071792
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
123171
07/21/92
$18,887.89
FIDELITY BANK
CITY PD PORTION S.S.
072192
CENT SVC GENER
SOCIAL SECURI
07/21/92
$4,961.35
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
072192
CENT SVC GENER
MEDICARE
< *>
$23,849.24*
123172
07/21/92
$19.62
PERA
PERA
072192
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
< *>
$19.62*
123173
07/21/92
$29,081.00
PERA
PERA
JULY 21
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
< *>
$29,081.00*
123174
08/12/92
$499.17
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586464
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$4.99
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586464
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$155.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586513
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.56
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586513
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$537.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586514
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.38
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586514
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$992.44
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586520
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$9.92
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586520
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$307.60
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586966
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.08
EAGLE WINE
LI19920727
586966
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$2,467.58*
123175
08/12/92
$755.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15318
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$451.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15271
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$381.86
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15343
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.64
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15343
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$644.55
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15344
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$626.05
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
145349
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$536.45
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15327
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$976.52
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15348
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $19.53
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15348
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$146.11
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15395
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.92
ED PHILLIPS h
SONS
LI19920727
15395
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$576.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15272
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$737.20,
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15189
VERNON SELLING,CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,425.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15354
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $28.51
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15354
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,101.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15355
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$539.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
15274
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$202.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
16467
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $49.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
137264
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CIO812
08/12/92
-$7.27
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
137228
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920727
137229
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0812
< *>
$8,982.77*
123176
08/12/92
$106.27
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
583925
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.13
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
583925
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12%92
$3,646.14
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587164
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK #. DATE CHECK AMOUNT
FRI, AUG 14, 1992
VENDOR
9:42 PM
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
123176 08/12/92
- $72.92
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587164
08/12/92
$491.06
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587165
08/12/92
-$9.82
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587165
08/12/92
$2,710.33
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587166
08/12/92
- $54.21
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587166
08/12/92
$3,705.17
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587167
08/12/92
- $74.10
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920727
587167
< ">
$10,445.79"
123177 08/12/92
$712.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487234
08/12/92
$7.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487234
08/12/92
-$7.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487234
08/12/92
$366.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487226
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487226
08/12/92
-$3.66
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487226
08/12/92
$357.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487242
08/12/92
$9.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487242
08/12/92
-$3.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487242
08/12/92
$2,018.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487259
08/12/92
$15.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487259
08/12/92
- $40.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487259
08/12/92
$1,473.42
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730•
7487267
08/12/92
$7.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487267
08/12/92
- $29.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487267
08/12/92
$387.55
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487291
08/12/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487291
08/12/92
-$3.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487291
08/12/92
$978.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487309
08/12/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487309
08/12/92
- $19.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487309
08/12/92
$1,131.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487275
08/12/92
$26.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487275
08/12/92
- $11.33
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487275
08/12/92
$318.05
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487283
08/12/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487283
08/12/92
-$3.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487283
08/12/92
$316.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487325
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487325
08/12/92
-$3.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487325
08/12/92
$4,384.99
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487317
08/12/92
$21.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487317
08/12/92
- $87.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487317
08/12/92
$44.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7493125
08/12/92
-$0.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7493125
08/12/92
$343.63
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
$3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
-$2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
- $343.63
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
-$3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
$2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
$243.63
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
$3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
-$2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487184
08/12/92
$619.41
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487176
08/12/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920730
7487176
VERNON SELLING.
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI081
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
•
page 8
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
page
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123177
08/12/92
-$6.20
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487176
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$686.43
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487168
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$16.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487168
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$6.87
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487168
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT- LI0812
08/12/92
$2,163.91
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487192
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$14.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487192
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $43.26
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487192
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$248.43
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487218
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487218
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.49
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487218
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$5,431.04
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487200
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$27.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487200
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $108.66
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7487200
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
-$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920730
7465159
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$21,667.48*
123178
08/12/92
$289.10
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25013
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$7.20
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25013
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$295.20
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25083
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$7.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25083
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/1.2/92
$136.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25084
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920730
25084
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$740.00*
123180
08/12/92
$189.74
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10488
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.79
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10488
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LIG812
08/12/92
$1,971.32
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10500
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $19.71
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10500
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,170.52
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10502
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $11.71
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10502
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$2,125.28
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10505
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $21.25
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10505
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$2,153.35
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10568
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $43.07
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10568
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$98.45
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10571
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.98
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10571
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$2,236.90
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10575
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $44.74
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10575
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,098.56
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10578
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $21.97
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10578
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$194.63
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10613
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.89
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10613
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$609.62
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10626
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$6.10
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10626
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$412.80
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10652
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$8.26
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10652
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$212.42
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10735
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$4.25
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
10735
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.59
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
7711
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$7.59
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
7711
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.58
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920730
7711
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
< *>
$12,276.29*
123181
08/12/92
$60.00
THE WINE
COMPANY
LI19920730
1215
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$3.00
THE WINE
COMPANY
LI19920730
1215
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
- - - - --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123181
08/12/92
$74.64
THE
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
1281
VERNOW SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
< *>
$137.64*
123182
08/12/92
$72.00
WORLD
CLASS
WINE
LI19920730
13485
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LID812
08/12/92
$110.00
WORLD
CLASS
WINE
LI19920730
13487
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
< *>
$182.00*
123183
08/12/92
$108.99
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.18
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
- 5108.99
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$2.18
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,623.44
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586529
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $16.23
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586529
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$722.44
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586531
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.22
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586531
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$29.27
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586873
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.29
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586873
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$29.27
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586874
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD.WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.29
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
586874
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$910.95
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
587050
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-59.11
PRIOR
WINE COMPANY
LI19920730
587050
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$3,282.23*
123185
08/12/92
$907.40
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17196
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,065.50
-ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17543
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$654.91
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17542
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $13.10
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17542
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$918.30
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17096
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$947.24
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17539
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $18.94
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17539
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$371.70
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17194
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.43
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17194
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$414.30
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17151
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,704.90
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17552
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$984.35
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17195
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$513.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $513.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$498.60
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$7.20
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $498.60
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.20
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$513.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $513.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$505.80
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$7.20
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18467
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.89
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
137488
YORK
SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $26.35
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
137424
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$192.10
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17537
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GO
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.84
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17537
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,321.25
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17538
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$388.25
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17209
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
L•IO812
08/12/92
-$6.72
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
137374
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUN
LI0812
08/12/92
$944.85
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
17389
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$128.25
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18466
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $128.25
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920803
18466
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P 0
page 11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123185
08/12/92
$126.45
JOHNSON
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920803
18466
50TH ST,SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
WINE
08/12/92
$1.80
7511686
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920803
18466
50TH ST',SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
$168.60
JOHNSON
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920803
18468
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
">
08/12/92
$2.40
7511694
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920803
18468
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0812
<
$630.30
$11,543.03"
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511702
08/12/92
$12.50
JOHNSON
WINE
123186
08/12/92
$108.99
08/12/92
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
-$2.18
$4,184.86
CO.
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19920803
588713
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
7511660
08/12/92
- $83.70
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
LI19920803
589473
589473
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GO LIQ
DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
WINE
08/12/92
$511.57
7511678
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589474
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
- $26.25
08/12/92
- $10.23
WINE
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589474
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI19920803
08/12/92
$1,701.54
$10.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589475
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
JOHNSON
08/12/92
- $34.03
LI19920803
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589475
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
$6,395.03
JOHNSON
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589476
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
CO.
08/12/92
08/12/92
- $127.90
$198.59
08/12/92
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19920803
LI19920803
589476
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.97
CO.
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
589477
589477
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GO LIQ
DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
7511793
08/12/92
$1,526.63
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
590543
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
">
08/12/92
- $30.53
7511801
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920803
590543
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
<
$14,334.67"
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511777
08/12/92
$10.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
123187 08/12/92
$3,186.17
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511686
08/12/92
$15.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511686
08/12/92
- $63.75
. JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511686
08/12/92
$179.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511694
08/12/92
$6.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511694
08/12/92
-$1.79
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511694
08/12/92
$630.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511702
08/12/92
$12.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511702
08/12/92
-$6.31
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511702
08/12/92
$573.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511660
08/12/92
$5.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511660
08/12/92
-$5.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511660
08/12/92
$1,312.71
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511678
08/12/92
$9.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511678
08/12/92
- $26.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511678
08/12/92
$509.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511819
08/12/92
$10.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511819
08/12/92
-$5.09
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511819
08/12/92
$575.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511769
08/12/92
$9.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511769
08/12/92
-$5.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511769
08/12/92
$138.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511793
08/12/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511793
08/12/92
-$1.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
- LI19920803
7511793
08/12/92
$261.03
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511801
08/12/92
$8.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511801
08/12/92
-$2.62
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511801
08/12/92
$1,393.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511777
08/12/92
$10.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511777
08/12/92
- $27.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511777
08/12/92
$3,359.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511785
08/12/92
$14.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511785
08/12/92
- $67.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511785
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GO LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GO WIN
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GO WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
L10812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
FRI,
AUG
14, 1992, 9:42 PM
08/12/92
-$1.94
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588836
08/12/92
$831.32
12
LI19920803
588838
08/12/92
-$8.31
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588838
08/12/92
$84.90
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588841
08/12/92
-$0.85
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
page
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
OBJECT
589367
P.O. #
123187
08/12/92
- $61.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
1451038
YORK
SELLING
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
-$7.13
LI19920803
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7485592
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF, GD
WIN
LI0812
- $12.91
08/12/92
- $14.81
11970
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7477490
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
QUALITY WINE
08/12/92
$313.53
08/12/92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511751
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
LI19920803
08/12/92
$6.00
$2,030.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511751
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
9513
08/12/92
-$3.14
QUALITY WINE
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511751
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
9513
08/12/92
$145.43
QUALITY WINE
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511744
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511744
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.44
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L-I19920803
7511744
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$59.61
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511728
50TH
ST
SELLIN'.CST
OF GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$0.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511728
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511728
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,389.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511736
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
$6.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511736
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
LIQ
LID812
08/12/92
- $27.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511736
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,215.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511710
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812.
08/12/92
$10.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511710
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $12.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7511710
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
- $562.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920803
7516651
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
< *>
$14,466.03*
123188
08/12/92
$163.80
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920803
25208
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$6.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920803
25208
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD
WIN
LI0812
< *>
$169.80*
_
123189 08/12/92
$166.59
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588836
08/12/92
-$1.94
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588836
08/12/92
$831.32
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588838
08/12/92
-$8.31
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588838
08/12/92
$84.90
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588841
08/12/92
-$0.85
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
588841
08/12/92
$488.34
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
589367
08/12/92
-$4.88
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920803
589367
< *>
$1,555.17*
123190 08/12/92
$2,634.85
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11604
08/12/92
- $26.35
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11604
08/12/92
$822.02
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11609
08/12/92
-$8.22
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11609
08/12/92
$1,290.72
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11970
08/12/92
- $12.91
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11970
08/12/92
$3,162.19
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11983
08/12/92
- $63.24
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11983-
08/12/92
$140.85
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11984
08/12/92
-$1.41
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11984
08/12/92
$2,615.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11985
08/12/92
- $52.32
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11985
08/12/92
$2,030.77
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11986
08/12/92
- $40.62
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
11986
08/12/92
- $124.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
08/12/92
$1.24
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
08/12/92
$124.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
08/12/92
-$1.24
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
08/12/92
- $124.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
08/12/92
$1.24
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
9513
i
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
L10812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 9:42 PM
page 13
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123190
08/12/92
$100.48
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
012378
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.01
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
012378
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$48.96
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
12609
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10812
08/12/92
-$0.49
QUALITY WINE
LI19920803
12609
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< ">
$12,516.26"
123191
08/12/92
$411.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
588778
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
-$4.11
$200.45
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
LI19920803
588778
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589384
589384
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
08/12/92
$774.29
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
5$9457
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.74
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589457
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$837.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589458
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$8.38
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589458
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$107.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589955
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19920803
589955
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$2,307.31*
123193
07/30/92
$21,344.45
MED CTR HEALTH PLAN
INSURANCE
073092
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$21,344.45*
123194
07/30/92
$16,314.16
GROUP HEALTH
INC
INSURANCE .073092
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$16,314.16*
123195
07/30/92
$27,401.90
MEDICA CHOICE
HOSPITALIZATION PREMI
073092
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$27,401.90*
123196
07/31/92
$114,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
073192
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
07/31/92
- $114,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
073192
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
123202
08/12/92
$515.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591213
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.15
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591213
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID812
08/12/92
$33.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591214
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.34
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591214
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$127.10
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591215
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LID812
08/12/92
-$1.27
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591215
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$544.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
'591242
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LID812
08/12/92
-$5.44
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591242
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$736.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591243
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.36
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591243
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$536.05
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591244
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.36
EAGLE WINE
LI19920806
591244
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$2,467.73*
123203
08/12/92
$253.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19467
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$551.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19163
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L10812
08/12/92
$466.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19293
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LIC812
08/12/92
$325.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19272
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
08/12/92
-$6.51
$275.70
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19920806
LI19920806
19272
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.51
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19273
19273
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
LI0812
08/12/92
$70.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19296
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$1.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
19296
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$421.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920806
20637
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
FRI, AUG 14, 1992
VENDOR
9:42 PM
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O.
123203
08/12/92
$475.35
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19297
08/12/92
$827.80
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19274
08/12/92
$618.10
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19090
08/12/92
$793.91
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19287
08/12/92
- $15.88
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19287
08/12/92
$82.11
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19303
08/12/92
-$1.64
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19303
08/12/92
$759.10
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
19301
08/12/92
$1,054.75
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19920806
L9423
< *>
$6,943.68*
123204
08/12/92
$302.40
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
590544
08/12/92
-$6.05
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
590544
08/12/92
$453.60
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
590545
08/12/92
-$9.07
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
590545
08/12/92
$130.59
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
591770
08/12/92
-$2.61
GRIGGS
COOPER
& CO.
LI19920806
591770
< *>
$868.86*
123205
08/12/92
$60.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539943
08/12/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539943
08/12/92
-$0.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539943
08/12/92
$407.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539935
08/12/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920806
7539935
08/12/92
-$4.09
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539935
08/12/92
$2,931.82
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539950
08/12/92
$14.50
JOHNSON
WINE.CO.
LI19920806
7539950
08/12/92
- $58.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539950
08/12/92
$177.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539968
08/12/92
$3.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539968
08/12/92
-$1.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539968
08/12/92
- $30.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
1451020
08/12/92
$2,325.65
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539992
08/12/92
$14.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539992
08/12/92
- $46.51
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539992
08/12/92
$637.03
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7540008
08/12/92
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7540008
08/12/92
-$6.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7540008
08/12/92
$999.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539976
08/12/92
$8.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539976
08/12/92
- $10.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539976
08/12/92
$158.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539984
08/12/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539984
08/12/92
-$1.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539984
08/12/92
- $19.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
1451012
08/12/92
$418.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539919
08/12/92
$9.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539919
08/12/92
-$4.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539919
08/12/92
$286.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539885
08/12/92
$9.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539885
08/12/92
-$2.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920806
7539885
08/12/92
$69.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539901
08/12/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539901
08/12/92
-$0.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539901
08/12/92
$1,019.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920806
7539877
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CST OF GD WIN LI0812
CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD LIQ LI0812
CASH DISCOUNT LI0812
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
TRADE DISCOUN
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF-GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
LI0812
L10812
LI0812
page 14
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
FRI, AUG 14,
1992, 9:42 PM
15
page
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
123205
08/12/92
$10.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920806
7539877
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.21
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920806
7539877
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$7,234.71
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920806
7539893
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
L10812
08/12/92
$40.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920806
7539893
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF'GD LIQ•LI0812
08/12/92
- $144.68
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920806
7539893
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$16,518.55*
123206
08/12/92
$330.75
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920806
25298
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$6.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920806
25298
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$337.15*
123207
08/12/92
$554.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591192
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
-
08/12/92
-$5.55
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591192
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$795.25
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591193
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$7.95
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591193
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$289.42
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591785
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.89
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920806
591785
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$1,623.03*
123208
08/12/92
$927.09
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
9094
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $18.54
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
9094
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,499.28
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13307
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $14.99
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13307
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,163.64
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13309
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $11.64
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13309
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,086:30
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13731
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
- $10.86
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13731
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$240.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13734
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$2.40
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13734
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$2,250.53
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13820
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $,_45.01
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13820
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$46.95
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13822
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$0.47
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13822
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,402.86
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13824
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $28.06
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13824
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$1,423.21-
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13825
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
- $28.46
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13825
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$169.34
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13946
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0812
08/12/92
-$3.39
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
13946
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
08/12/92
$509.53
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
14348
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
-$5.10
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920806
14348
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0812
< *>
$10,549.81*
123209
08/12/92
$132.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19920806
11039
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
08/12/92
$2.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19920806
11039
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0812
< *>
$134.00*
$508,347.11*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY BY CHECK NUMBER FRI, AUG 14, 1992, 10:00 PM
page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
# 10
$170,416.68
FUND
# 26
$58,339.50
FUND
# 27
$7,000.00
FUND
# 40
$281.67
FUND
# 50
$272,309.26
$508,347.11"
.2 1 •
RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 1993, AND ESTABLISHING
PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 1993 PAYABLE IN 1993
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1993 is
hereby proposed as follows:
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
$14,471,815
Section 2. Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby proposed
as follows:
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 3,146,700
Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and
personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the
amount as follows:
FOR GENERAL FUND $11,325,115
Adopted this 8th day of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
r�
rw
0
H
ri3
Sae
N I7 19 V M V Lip V L/ V I.- ■
f— . '
o e 1993 Annual Budget
�4 a�
.moo.
Table of Contents Page
I. Summary
Overview
Revenue by Fund and Source 1 - 3
Expenditures by Fund & Source 4-6
11. General Government
Overview
Mayor Council
7-8
Administration
9-10
Planning
11-12
Finance
13-14
Election
15-16
Assessing
17-18
Legal & Court Services
19-20
III. Public Works
Overview
Administration
21-22
Engineering
23-24
Supervision
25-26
Payroll Distribution
27-28
Street Maintenance
29-32
Street Lighting
33-34
Street Name Signs
35-36
Traffic Control
37-38
Bridges /Guard Rails
39-40
Retaining Wall Maintenance
41-42
Sidewalks /Ramps /Parking Lots
43-46
a 1993 Annual Budget
Table of Contents Page
IV., Public Safety
Overview
Police Protection
Civilian Defense
Animal Control
Fire Protection
Public Health
Inspections
V. Park & Recreation
Overview
Administration
Recreation
Payroll Distribution
Maintenance
VI. Non - Departmental
Overview
Contingencies
Capital Plan Appropriation
Special Assessments on City Property
Reserve Rebuild
Commissions & Special Projects
VII. Appendix
Central Services
General
City Hall
Public Works Building
Equipment Operation
Capital Plan
47-50
51-52
53-54
55-58
59-60
61-62
63-64
65-70
71-72
73 -82
83-84
85-86
87 -88
89-90
91-94
95 -96
97-98
99-100
101-102
103- 107
e 1993 Annual Budget
0
rV sy
Summary of
Revenues & Expenditures
Taxes (7 6.
Revenue Overview
Revenues - Distribution by Area
Aid (3.5%)
Charges (14.3%)
Licenses & Permits (5.4%)
Total Expenditures Overview
Total Expenditures - Distribution by Area
Non— Departr
Parks (1
Public Safety (47
.
vernment (13. 9 %)
Public Works (23.8%)
Summary of Expenditures by Type
Equ ipr
Central Services (21.2%)
Commodities (5.0%)
Contractual Services (1 2
0 eSCi vc w. i i01
- _',
(53.7 %)
PAGE - 2
REVENUES
BY FUND & FUNCTION
1990
1991
1992
1993
GENERA_ FUND:
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
TAXES:
REAL & PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES
$9,835,705
$10,169,130
$9,982,454
$10,182,324
$10,485,115
HACA
14,866
238,437
274,437
840,000
PENALITIES & INTEREST
3,958
4,310
25,000
25,000
25,000
LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS
(225.000)
TOTAL TAXES
9.839.663
10.188.306
10.245.891
10.481.761
11.125.115
LICENSES & PERMITS:
BEER & LIQUOR
16,213
23,904
20,315
18,000
20,000
CIGARETTE /VENDING
654
3,900
3,240
600
350
DOG & IMPOUNDING FEES
9,264
10,815
11,500
12,000
12,000
FOOD & SOFT DRINKS
46,326
46,330
46,300
51,400
46,750
GAS PUMPS, TANKS & BURNING
1,696
2,175
1,975
2,000
2,000
BOWLING, TAXI, & AMUSEMENT
9,310
4,540
6,000
10,000
6,000
SCAVENGER & GARBAGE COLLECTORS
2,315
6,355
1,800
2,000
2,100
BUILDING
531,173
510,950
500,000
480,000
480,000
CESSPOOL & SEWER
0
1,780
400
400
400
PLUMBING
.74,042
49,721
64,000
72,000
64,000
SIGN
7,876
7,191
8,000
8,000
8,000
.HEATING,VENTILATION & MECHANICAL
121,872
134,992
90,000
80,000
90,000
OTHER
15,457
7,983
20,000
7,884
8,000
POOLS & SPA
11,803
11,990
12,250
12,000
12,500
SPRINKLER
26.297
28.271
25.300
22.000
25.000
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
874.298
850:897
811.080
778.284
777.100
FEES & CHARGES:
ENGINEERING & CLERICAL
141,813
185,392
140,000
140,000
140,000
MUNICIPAL COURT FINES
494,009
437,433
475,000
495,000
475,000
CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS
105,000
115,020
123,300
123,300
127,000
CONTRIBUTION FROM LIQUOR FUND
350,000
380,000
380,000
380,000
380,000
ASSESSING SEARCHES
4,120
3,504
5,000
5,000
5,000
PLANNING FEES
9,362
10,910
11,710
11,000
12,000
SALES & RENTAL PROPERTY
33,809
24,149
30,000
30,000
30,000
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
15,637
33,369
30,000
35,000
35,000
INCOME ON INVESTMENTS
77,168
97,061
40,000
80,000
50,000
LABORATORY FEES
9,875
11,102
12,000
8,000
10,000
DONATIONS
25
30
0
500
500
FALSE ALARMS - POLICE
35,234
40,175
37,000
37,000
37,000
FALSE ALARMS - FIRE
0
2,800,
2,000
2,000
2,000
HAZMAT FEE
0
0
0
3,000
3,000
REGISTRATION FEE - SWIMMING &
ACTIVITIES
78,758
98,132
80,000
80,000
85,000
SERVICES - HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
166,428
194,768
150,000
150,000
150,000
AMBULANCE SERVICE
411.441
427.212
500.000
475.000
525.000
TOTAL FEES & CHARGES
1.932.679
2.061.057
2.016.010
2.054.800
2.066.500
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS AND
FEES AND CHARGES
$2.806.977
$2.911.954
$2.827.090
$2.833.084
$2.843.600
PAGE - 3
REVENUES
BY F1Am 3 FIRICTION
1990
1991
1992
1993
GENERAL FUND CONT'O:
ACTIIAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BIAIGETED
ADOPTED
- INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
$3,419
$5,736
$0
$0
$0
STATE HIGHWAY TAX
60,000
60,000
160,000
160,000
160,000
HOUSING ASSISTANCE AID
0
1,446
0
0
0
FEDERAL AID
8,000
7,000
7,000
10,000
10,000
POLICE AID (1 %)
196,885
223,190
220,000
220,000
220,000
HENNEPIN COUNTY HEALTH PROGRAM
126.619
117.229
113.100
113.100
113.100
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID
394.923
414.601
500.100
503.100
503.100
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
$13,041,563
$13,514,861
$13,573,081
$13,817,945
$14,471,815
PAGE - 4
E)alENOITURES
BY FUND & FUNCTION
PARK DEPARTMENT:
ADMINISTRATION
1990
1991
1992
382,700
1993
GENERAL FUND:
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
GENERAL GOVERNMENT:
1.212.336
1.330.994
1.288.893
1.216.324
1.258.181
MAYOR & COUNCIL
$60,271
$59,348
$61,175
$60,250
$61,270
ADMINISTRATION
598,307
602,287
595,687
579,141
600,464
PLANNING
160,002
209,729
208,725
218,431
228,349
FINANCE
304,896
331,886
342,310
344,727
359,260
ELECTION
69,898
33,872
105,100
94,650
31,049
ASSESSING
347,583
357,955
374,155
376,898
390,940
LEGAL & COURT SERVICES
421.280
419.440
352.000
330.000
343.000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
1.962.237
2.014.517
2.039.152
2.004.097
2.014.332
PUBLIC WORKS:
ADMINISTRATION
113,141
116,312
120,090
119,222
123,344
ENGINEERING
408,418
443,096
431,475
426,009
444,061
SUPERVISION
424,093
437,992
451,071
456,089
484,987
STREET MAINTENANCE
1,499,858
1,682,057
1,714,133
1,647,133
1,746,231
STREET LIGHTING
322,498
284,136
303,950
340,150
379,150
STREET NAME SIGNS
68,644
56,767
61,100
53,500
55,100
TRAFFIC CONTROL
86,711
75,356
94,105
96,400
103,300.
BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS
8,399
6,813
9,000
15,500
15,800
RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
0
20,000
SIDEWALKS,RAMPS & PARKING LOTS
52.349
81.897
74.850
78.650
78.400
TOTAL PUBLIC VORKS
2.984.111
3.184.426
3.259.774
3.232.653
3.450.373
PUBLIC SAFETY:
POLICE
3,387,013
3,586,346
3,670,245
3,608,682
3,837,519
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
24,832
20,182
20,997
27,761
28,894
ANIMAL CONTROL
62,631
49,225
50,982
57,482
54,466
FIRE
1,996,642
2,132,602
2,186,354
2,119,869
2,274,682
PUBLIC HEALTH
295,066
308,423
325,200
324,280
337,925.
INSPECTIONS
294.537
300.857
300.448
265.819
278.841
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
6.060.721
6.397.635
6.554.226
6.403.893
6.812.327
PARK DEPARTMENT:
ADMINISTRATION
372,132
408,492
397,050
382,700
406,922
RECREATION
89,833
136,090
117,470
116,750
124,630
MAINTENANCE
1.212.336
1.330.994
1.288.893
1.216.324
1.258.181
TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT
$1.674.301
$1.875.576
$1.803.413
$1.715.774
$1.789.733
PAGE - 5
EXPENDITURES
BY FUND & FUNCTION
1990
1991
1992
1993
GENERAL FUND (CONT'D):
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
NON-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES:
CONTINGENCIES
$94,266
$94,266
$40,000
$60,000
$60,000
RESERVE REBUILD
0
0
0"
0
100,000
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
42,951
51,450
42,450
45,000
45,000
CAPITAL PLAN APPROPRIATION
115,000
117,000
0
117,000
117,000
COMMISSIONS & SPECIAL PROJECTS
234.025
234.025
224.302
239,528
83.050
TOTAL NON - DEPARTMENTAL
486,242
496,741
306,752
461.528
405.050
TOTAL. OPERATING EXPENDITURES
$13,167,611
$13,968,895
$13,963,317
$13,817,945
$14,471,815
1� �r
1993 Annual Budget
General Government
General Government Overview
General Government - Distribution by Area
Legal & Court i
Assessing (19.4%)
Bections (1
Flnui UGC k I W /o f
kdm in ist. (29.8%)
ing (1 1.3%)
General Government - Distribution by Expenditure
tqu
Central Services (1 5
Commodities (0.2 %)
SalU1 k-� V-j . ki -a/
. /- - -%
Svs. (2 5.5 %)
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 7
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA PROGRAM:
GffiQSRAL - 10 G IERAL GOVERNMENT MAYOR & COUNCIL 0100
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Mayor & Council:
The City Council constitutes the policy making division of Edina
City Government. The Council is composed of the Mayor and four Council
members, all elected at large for overlapping terms of four years.
The Mayor is the official head of City Government and is the presiding
officer at Council meetings. The Council meets on the first and third
Mondays of each month at the City Hall. The City Council also
serves as the Housing Redevelopment Authority.
1992 1993 %
Total Mayor & Council Budget $60,250 $61,270 1.7
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET FacF - R
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
MAYOR & COUNCIL
0100
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSOYAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$27.556
$27.557
527.450
527.450
$27.450
OONTRACRIAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
831
0
0
0
0
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
140
722
2,000
2,000
2,000
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
2,730
2,413
1,825
700
700
4208 MILEAGE
0
0
0
0
0
3.701
3.135
3,825
2,700
2.700
CDCimITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1.534
576
1,100
1.300
1.300
CBnW L SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
17,400
17,640
18,120
18,120
18,720
4804 CITY HALL
10.080
10.440
10,680
10.680
11,100
27.480
28,080
28,800
28.800
29,820
TOTAL MAYOR & COUNCIL
$60,271
$59,348
$61,175
$60,250
$61,270
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 9
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GERERAL - 10 Gffi ORAL GOVETt1IMIMIT ADMIAISTRATION 0120
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Administration:
Personal Services consists of 8 full time employees in this area.
The office of the City Manager is responsible for executing the
policies adopted by the City Council. Specifically, the City
Manager's office provides for the general management of the City
and is responsible for the following:
- Personnel compensation and benefits administration for approximately
700 full time and part -time employees
- Labor relations with three organized bargaining units
- Risk management
- Long -range planning
- Maintenance of official records and minutes
- Publication of ordinances and legal notices
- Licensing
- Policy research and implementation
- Management of selected central services.
- Human relations
- Staff service to the HRA
- Employee training and career development
- Facility management of City Hall
1992 1993 $
Total AA-inistration Budget $579,141 $600,464 3.7
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 10
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATION
0120
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$408,242
$389,173
$402,004
4110 OVERTIME
3.000
3.000
3.000
$430.068
5416.968
411.242
392.173
405.004
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13,518
15,166
10,000
9,000
9,250
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
2,211
974
4,300
4,300
4,300
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
30,153
44,683
43,400
43,500
44,500.
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
1,785
1,202
2,000
2,000
2,000
4208 MILEAGE
2,774
194
1,500
1,500
1,600 .
4210 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
6,640
8,058
5,200
5,200
6,200
4290 POSTAGE
607
1.194
600
600
600
57.688
71.471
67.000
66,100
68.450
COMMODITIES:
4502 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS
370
301
200
150
200
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
800
1,040
1,045
200
220
4516 OFFICE SUPPLIES
197
119
500
100
100
4600 PRINTING
118
365
500
250
270
1.485
1.825
2,245
700
790
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
85,200
87,240
88,380
88,380
92,580
4804 CITY HALL
15,600
16,320
16,620
16,620
17,400
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
4,200
4,356
6,000
6,000
6,240
105,000
107.916
111.000
111.000
116.220
EWIPIEIIT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
3,267
4,107
4,200
9,168
10,000
4902 NEW
799
0
0
0
0
4,066
4.107
4,200
9.168
10,000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
$598,307
$602,287
$595,687
$579,141
$600,464
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 11
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GffiiSRAL - 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLAINIAG 0140
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Planning;
Personal services consists of 3 & 3/4 full time employees in this area.
The Planning Department provides staff services to the City Council, the
Planning Commission, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, the Heritage
Preservation Board and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
The department also handles the administration of the City's sign ordinance,
the zoning ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, the Metro Rental Assistance
Program, and the Federal Community Development Block Grant program.
1992 1993 $
Total Planning Budget $218,431 $228,349 4.5
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oere 19
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
PLANNING
0140
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$154,575
$160,910
$168,589
4110 OVERTIME
2,500
2.500
2,500
$107.772
$149.847
157.075
163.410
171.089
COITRACTM SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
3,324
0
900
1,200
1,200
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
314
242
300
300
300
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
0
0
100
100
100
4208 MILEAGE
0
35
100
100
100
3.638
277
1.400
1.700
1.700
CO]BIDDITIES:
4502 BOOKS 8 PAMPHLETS
10
157
50
100
100
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
82
152
50
100
100
4508 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
64
19
50
100
100
4600 PRINTING
0
0
300
500
500
156
328
450
800
800
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
39,600
41,100
42,300
42,300
44,100
4804 CITY HALL
5,400
5,580
5,640
5,640
5,880
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
1,800
1,860
1.860
1.860
1.980
46,800
48.540
49.800
49.800
51.960
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
1,636
10,737
0
2,721
2,800
4902 NEW
0
0
0
0
0
1.636
10.737
0
2,721
2.800
TOTAL PLANING
$160,002
$209,729
$208,725
$218,431
$228,349
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 13
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GBNZRRL - 10 GENSftAL GOVSRI092IT F119aNCE 0160
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Finance:
Personal services consist of 5 and 1/2 full time employees in this area.
The Finance Department provides accounting and control services for all
financial activities of the City. Major functions include:
- During 1991 the Finance Department issued over 11,500 payroll checks on a payroll
of over $10,929,600 for approximately 740 full time and part time employees;
- Preparation of annual budget, comprehensive annual report, enterprise profit
and loss statements, bond statements, and other financial reports;
- Issuance of 9,500 accounts payable checks on expenditures of over
43,000,000 for general operating, debt service, capital projects,
enterprise activities and other City functions during 1991;
- Performing financial analysis on investments and various proposals; and
- Maintain records on $400,000 of liquor and wine inventory.
1992 1993 $
Total Finance Budget $344,727 $359,260 4.2
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
DAM It
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCE
0160
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL.SEWICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$226,130
$226,130
$236,805
4110 OVERTIME
2.500
2.500
2.500
$198.127
$216.103
228.630
228.630
239.305
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
31
0
0
0
4202.CONTINUING EDUCATION
1,632
1,721
2,500
1,500
1,500
4204 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
567
363
400
400
400
4208 MILEAGE
2,608
2,013
2,300
2,050
2,100
4216 ANNUAL AUDIT
3,500
3,500
4,200
3,700
3,800
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
0
0
0
300
200
4233 DATA PROCESS ING -LOGIS
33,561
46.555
44.500
43.000
44.000
41,868
54.183
53.900
50.950
52.000
COMMIT1ES:
4502 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
23
0
50
50
50
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1.847
595
450
450
475
1,870
595
500
500
525
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
50,400
50,880
52,080
52,080
54,480
4804 CITY HALL
6,840
7,080
7.200
7.200
7.524
57.240
57.960
59.280
59.280
62.004
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
5,791
3,045
0
5,367
5,426
4902 NEW
0
0
0
0
0
5.791
3.045
0
5.367
5.426
TOTAL FINANCE
$304,896
5331,886
$342,310
$344,727
$359,260
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 15
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 GENERAL GOVERI0NT ELECTIOF 0180
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Elections:
Personal Services consist of one (1) full time person of which one -half (1/2) the
salary is billed to the school district as election costs.
The City .Clerk is responsible for conducting all national, state, county and
City elections held in the City of Edina in even - numbered years.
The City is divided into 20 voting precincts which must be equipped for
conducting each election. The Clerk must recruit and train approximately
275 election judges in each election year. Approximately 3,000 absentee ballot
applications are processed.
The Clerk is also responsible for maintaining_ the permanent voter registration
system for the City amounting to almost 35,000 registrations. In a twelve month
period about 6,500 registration changes are processed.
Explanation of Change:
No elections will be held in 1993.
1992 1993
Total Election Budget $94,650 $31,049 -67.2
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
eAr_e _ 7t
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ELECTION
0180
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$47.226
514.562
583.950
869.990
$15.489
CONTRACRLIL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9.518
11.465
12.000
12.000
6.500
CON WITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,113
21
495
2,250
270
4600 PRINTING
3.241
24
495
2.250
270
5.354
45
990
4.500
540
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
7.800
7.800
8.160
8,160
8.520
TOTAL ELECTION
$69,898
$33,872
$105,100
$94,650
$31,049
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 17
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSING 200 - 20
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Assessing:
Personal services consist of 6 full time employees in this area.
The Assessing Department performs annual classification and valuation of Edina's
20,000 real estate parcels. The accepted approaches to value are considered in the
appraisal process. All tangible changes to property that may affect market value
are physically inspected using building permits as an informational source.
Statistical analysis is performed on over 700 residential sales and existing
assessor's market values each year, forming the basis for annual adjustments of
values. Sales and the analysis of available income and expense data generate
adjustments to commercial, industrial and apartment values. Because of the almost
subjective nature of real estate value opinion and some classifications, dozens of
tax court petitions and scores of abatements and individual appeals /reviews are
processed annually. Dissemination of general and specific information, explanation
of processes and procedures, trial preparation and negotiations with taxpayers or
their legal representatives are on -going functions.
Ratios of assessor's values to sale prices are compared, coordinated and
argued annually between municipalities within Hennepin County to assure an
acceptable level of assessment and equity of contribution to non -local
jurisdictions. Ratios are also monitored and corrected within the Commissioner of
Revenue's office to prevent undue adverse effects upon local aids and tax court
decisions.
Computing, notifying, spreading and collecting of special assessments are also
functions of the assessing department.
1992 1993 $
Total Assessing Budget $376,898 $390,940 3.7
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
osra 1R
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ASSESSING
0200
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$230,952
$246,686
$259.453
$259.453
$269,535
COMTRACLILL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
430
431
700
700
700
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
1,363
1,325
1,800
1,800
1,800
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,061
937
1,200
1,200
1,200
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
314
264
400
400
400
4208 MILEAGE
409
156
500
500
500
4233 DATA PROCESSING - LOGIS
31,427
36,980
36.822
36,822
37.000
35,004
40,093
41.422
41,422
41,600
001lRnITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
950
1,216
1,000
1.000
1.050
950
1.216
1,000
1,000
1.050
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
58,200
60,000
61,620
61,620
64,704
4804 CITY HALL
6,000
6,240
6,360
6,360
6,660
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
3.600
3,720
3,000
3.000
3,120
67,800
69.960
70,980
70,980
74.484
EWIPNENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
12.877
0
1,300
4,043
4,271
TOTAL ASSESSING
$347,583
$357,955
$374,155
$376,898
$390,940
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 19
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION: AREA:
LEGAL &
GENERAL GOVffii101ENT COURT SERVICES
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Legal & Court Services:
PROGRAM:
0220
The City requires the professional service of attorneys who are
contracted for on an annual basis. They provide legal counsel and
prepare the necessary ordinances and resolutions required to implement
the wishes of the City Council. The Prosecuting Attorney defends the City
in claims and suits and prosecute all cases arising out of violation of
City ordinances.
The following list constitutes the number of cases prosecuted in 1991:
Arraignments 2,541
Pre - Trials 693
Court Trials 205
Jury Trials 119
Total 3,558
1992 1993 %
Total Legal & Court Services Budget $330,000 $343,000 3.9
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oer.F - 2e
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
LEGAL 8 COURT SERVICES
0710
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CORTRACIUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL - PROSECUTING
$155,000
$135,432
5135,000
5130,000
$135,000
4218 PROFESSIONAL - CIVIL
143,472
194,670
100,000
92,000
95,000
4244 HENNEPIN COUNTY - COURT
CHARGE
30,142
28,593
32,000
32,000
34,000
4286 BOARD & ROOM - PRISONERS
92.666
60,745
85.000
76.000
79,000
TOTAL LEGAL i
COURT SERVICES
5421, 280
$419,440
5352,000
5330,000
$343,000
9t��' tiY
o�( a 1993 Annual Budget
Public Works
Public Works Overview
Public Works - Distribution by Area
Administration (3.6 %)
Eng ineering (12. 8 %) -\,
Sidewalks (2.6 %)
Traffic Control (3.0%)-
Lighting (10. 9 %)
Name Signs (1 .6 %)
Supervision (14.0%)'
Bridges (0.5%)
Walls (0.6 %)
Maint. (50.5 %)
Public Works - Distribution by Expenditure
Equ iprr
Central Services (25.4%)
CWI I 1 ditic k —*J
Salaries (35.3%)
Svc. (1 5.0 %)
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 21
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 0240
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Public Works Rdministration:
Personal Services consist of 1 & 1/2 full time employees in this area.
This department provides supervision and policy guidance over various Public
Works' departments. These crews are Engineering, Streets, Utilities and Equip-
ment Operation. The total permanent employment in the Public Works area is 57.
The function of the City Engineer is also provided under Public Works Admin-
istration.
Additionally, operating City liaison to other agencies such as MNDOT, Metro
Council, Hennepin County, MTC, MWCC, Watershed Board, PCA, Minnesota Board of
Health and other cities is provided through this account.
1992 1993 $
Total Public Works Budget $3,232,653 $3,450,373 6.7
Explanation of change:
The public works area accounts for approximately $75,000 of our sales tax liability
for 1993. Additionally, the cost of NSP is rising about 6% adding an extra $25,000. in
cost. Without these two items in the budget, the public works area would
increase approximately 3.65 %.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
var,E - 22
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
0240
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
586.077
$88.947
$91.060
$90.192
$92.934
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
334
440
1,000
1,000
1,000
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
90
165
250
250
250
424
605
1.250
1.250
1.250
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
21,600
21,600
22,560
22,560
23,700
4804 CITY NAIL
3,240
3,300
3,360
3,360
3,540
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
1.800
1.860
1.860
1.860
1.920
26.640
26,760
27.780
27.780
29.160
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
$113,141
$116,312
$120,090
$119,222
3123,344
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 23
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GE1EtAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 0260
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Engineering:
Personal Services consist of 7 & 1/2 employees in this area.
The Engineering Department prepares plans, specifications and estimates
for public construction projects. This includes street grading and
surfacing, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermains and other
structures and improvements. It supervises the construction of these
projects and provides the necessary inspection to insure materials and
workmanship are in accordance with project specifications. The department
maintains records and files on all of the above mentioned activities
and operates and maintains plan reproduction equipment.
Explanation of Change:
A request of $1,200 is made for 2 new radios for the second survey crew that
operates from May through October. With this equipment, survey crews can
work up to 1 mile apart thereby improving the efficiency of this crew doing
topography studies.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 24
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING
0260
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$296,200
$285,000
$295,574
4110 OVERTIME
2.000
2.000
0
$282,721
$276.807
298.200
287.000
295.574
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14,158
27,354
19,000
15,000
10,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
818
640
575
600
2,000
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
317
65
175
200
200
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
13
258
825
300
300
4208 MILEAGE
0
19
100
100
100
15.306
28,336
20.675
16,200
12.600
rn T ITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
10,443
6,479
4,500
4,500
6,000
4570 BLUEPRINTING
3,686
4,572
4,000
4,000
4,200
4604 LUMBER 8 TOOLS
1.550
1.987
2.500
2.500
2.500
15.679
13.038
11.000
11.000
12,700
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
72,000
74,160
75,360
75,360
77,700
4804 CITY HALL
6,600
6,840
6,960
6,960
7,284
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
11,400
11.880
11.280
11.280
12.000
90.000
92,880
93.600
93.600
96.984
EQUIPNM:
4901 REPLACEMENT
2,841
31,432
8,000
18,209
25,003
4902 NEW
1.871
603
0
0
1.200
4.712
32.035
8.000
18,209
26,203
TOTAL ENGINEERING
$408,418
$443,096
$431,475
$426,009
$444,061
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 25
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISION 0280 THRU 0281
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Supervision - 0280:
Personal services consist of three full time employees and part time help.
The operations of the Public Works Department are overseen by the Public
Works Superintendent. Some of the activities include:
1. maintaining a computerized vehicle management system to determine
the expense of vehicle maintenance;
2. the purchasing and billing of equipment and supplies; and
3. maintaining an up -to -date inventory of the commodities used to
service the City.
Additionally, the Superintendent, through this account, plans and coordinates
Public Works activities, maintains cost and work records and provides the
training and instruction necessary to insure the men do their jobs most
efficiently and effectively.
Explanation of Change:
The cost of hazardous waste disposal will increase $10,000 for the general fund for
1992. This is a result fo the increased cost of disposal for waste such as tires,
antifreeze, illegally dumped material etc. This program pays accounts for $3,000
of the extra cost. The other programs included in this cost are general maintenance
0301 and the public works building 0540.
Training - 0281:
This program provides for the personal services time and aids required to
provide the necessary training.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 26
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
SUPERVISION
0280 THIN! 0281
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
SUPERVISION - 0280
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$119,575
5123,743
$127,461
4110 OVERTIME
$500
500
1.500
$106.803
$110.387
120,075
124,243
128.961
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
790
936
2,000
2,000
2,000
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
35
123
50
200
200
4318 GOPHER ONE STATE
6,360
4,887
5,200
7,500
7,500_
4322 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
0
2.634
3.750
3.750
6.750
7,185
8.580
11.000
13.450
16,450
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
288,000
292,509
293,700
293,700
308,100
4806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
13,200
14,280
15,336
15,336
16,056
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
1.800
1.860
1.860
1,860
1.920
303.000
308.649
310,896
310.896
326.076
TOTAL SUPERVISION
$416. 988
$427,616
5441,971
$448.589
$471.487
TRAINING- 0281
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$5.128
57.390
$7.000
$5.000
$10,000
CONTRACTWL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
1,977
2.286
1,000
1.000
2.000
COMMODITIES:
4608 TRAINING AIDS
0
700
1.100
1.500
1.500 .
TOTAL TRAINING
$7.105
510.376
59,100
$7.500
$13.500
TOTAL SUPERVISION
8 TRAINING
$424, 093
$437,992
$451,071
$456,089
$484,987
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 27
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
STREET
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTKENT
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Street Department
PAYROLL
SUMMARY - DISTRIBUTION
The Street Department consists of twenty -six (26) personnel which include the
following positions:
One (1) Street Foreman
One (1) Master Electrician
Eight (8) Heavy Equipment Operators
Eleven (11) Equipment Operators
. Five (5) Specialists
Additionally, six (6) summer employees are hired to assist in various projects.
PUBLIC WORKS:
TRAINING
STREET MAINTENANCE:'
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
STREET SWEEPING
STREET RENOVATION
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
STREET LIGHTING:
REGULAR
,ORNAMENTAL .
STREET NAME SIGNS
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
PAVEMENT MARRING
BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS
RETAINING WALLS
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS•:
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
PARKING RAMP MAINTENANCE
PARKING LOTS
$ 10,000 CHARGE TO OTHER FUNDS:
CENTRAL SERVICES:
223,875 CITY HALL $ 11,500
82,000 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 31,000
112,000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 35,000
162,800 PARRS 12,510
ENTERPRISE FUNDS 79.000
3,150
11,500
29,500
8,400
19,000
10,000
6,000
8,000
9,000
6,000
3.000
S704,225
TOTAL STREET PAYROLL $ 873,235
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 29
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
STREET
GffiO3RAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS JUL111 ERMCB 0301 thru 0310
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
General Xaintenance - 0301:
These funds are allocated for the general repairs made to the street;
i.e. crack sealing, patching, seal coating, skin coating, and curb repair.
Crews totaling approximately five "man years" work on general maintenance of City
street year round, weather permitting.
Equipment - 0305:
This program provides funding for the replacement of existing equipment and
the purchase of new equipment for all Public Works programs.
Street Sweeping - 0310:
These funds are allocated for cleaning the 200 miles (800 lane miles)
of City streets and 45 parking lots. Sweeping usually begins in early
March, attempting to rid the streets and lots of winter sand to prevent
being washed in the storm sewers.
Six men are involved in the sweeping effort from early spring
into the summer and begins again in the fall when leaves are swept
up to prevent the clogging of catch basins.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oerc .:n
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
STREET MAINTENANCE
0301 TNRU 0310
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 0301
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$226,000
$199,000
$222,875
4110 OVERTIME
1.000
1.000
1.000
$247.949
$270.627
227.000
200.000
223.875
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
28,757
500
500
500
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
510
88
1,000
500
500
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIR
1,666
880
15,000
10,000
10,000
4250 RUBBISH HAULING
6,137
6,894
8,000
4,000
8,000
4252 LIGHT 8 POWER
4,155
2,967
5,250
5,250
6,000
4258 WATER 8 SEWER SERVICES
0
0
1,000
1,000
0
4262 LAUNDRY
8.616
9.448
10.000
10.000
12.000
21.084
49.034
40.750
31.250
37.000
CO�ITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
13,795
14,323
12,500
12,500
13,000
4520 CALCIUM CHLORIDE
0
500
2,000
2,000
2,100
4522 SELECT MATERIALS
0
0
1,000
1,000
1,100
4524 ASPHALT MIX
10,930
13,046
25,000
25,000
26,000
4526 MC 1 OIL
334
0
4,000
4,000
2,000
4528 CONCRETE
0
0
2,000
2,000
2,100
4532 CLASS V MATERIAL
136
401
1,000
1,000
1,100
4580 TOOLS
10,907
10,929
8,000
8,000
9,000
4642 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
6.427
8.015
6.000
6,000
7.000
42.529
47,214
61.500
61.500
63.400
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
396.000
412,980
407.580
407.580
428.580
TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
$707.562
$779.855
$736.830
$700.330
$752.855
EQUIPMENT - 0305
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
$279,652
$283,374
5310,003
$310,003
5335,876
4902 NEW
0
6.580
0
0
0
TOTAL REPLACEMENT
$279.652
$289.954
$310.003
$310.003
$335.876
STREET SWEEPING - 0310
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$78.530
566.620
582.000
$82.000
$82.000
COMMODITIES:
4534 BROOMS
8,423
8,392
8,500
8,500
9,500
4536 WEARING SHOES
496
719
500
500
1.000
8.919
9.111
9,000
9.000
10.500
TOTAL STREET SWEEPING
$87,449
$75.731
$91.000
$91,000
$92.500
CITY OF EDINA I ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 31
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
STREW
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC NORRS MAINTENANCE 0314 thru 0320
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Street Renovation - .0314:
This program incorporates 15 miles of street renovations yearly. A 3
(three) step process is involved whereby 1. Cracks in the road are sealed
with RC „800 oil; 2.,A thin coat of asphalt is applied to bring the road to
grade; and 3. A coat of RC 800 is applied on to the asphalt to rejuvenate
the old asphalt and form a seal for the buck shot rock or trap rock which is
applied last.
Ten to 15 men are involved in street renovations working from mid -May
(when road restrictions are lifted) until late August.
Snow and Ice Removal - 0318:
Snow and ice removal in Edina constitutes a majority of the Street
Department's work during the winter months. The City, which consists
of 200 miles of street, 17 miles of sidewalk, 5 miles of alley, 273 cul-
de -sacs, 45 parking lots and 2 parking ramps, is divided into 26 plow
routes. The equipment involved in plowing includes 21 trucks with
plows, 3 graders, 3 loaders and 1 sidewalk plow. Ten units are equipped
with wings for more efficient plowing.
Replacements - 0320:
These funds are allocated to contractual repairs for repair projects too
large for City maintenance crews and are overseen by the Engineering
Department.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oerc z2
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
STREET MAINTENANCE
0314 1 1 0318
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
RENOVATION - 0314
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$98.177
5100.864
$112.000
$112.000
$112.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0
438
3,000
3,000
3,000
4249 DUMPING CHARGES
0
0
3.500
3.500
4.000
0
438
6.500
6,500
7.000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
6,099
8,457
2,000
2,000
2,100
4522 GRANULAR MATERIALS
25,527
27,701
25,000
25,000
26,000
4524 ASPHALT MIX
96,927
88,266
85,000
85,000
90,000
4526 MC 1 OIL
58,895
48,003
63,000
63,000
67,000
4528 CONCRETE
15,890
16.209
25.000
25.000
26.000
203.338
188.636
200.000
200.000
211.100
TOTAL RENOVATION
:301.515
$289,938
$318.500
$318.500
:330.100
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL - 0318
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$166,800
$147,800
$147,800
4110 OVERTIME
20.000
15.000
15.000
$72.795
:171.241
186.800
162.800
162.800
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,024
5,465
7,500
7,500
8,000
4520 CALCIUM CHLORIDE
1,120
1,350
2,000
2,000
2,100
4522 SAND
25,072
33,839
31,500
30,000
32,000
4538 SALT
21.669
34.684
30.000
25.000
30.000
50.885
75.338
71.000
64.500
72.100
TOTAL SNOW & ICE REINIVAL
$123.680
$246.579
$257.800
$227.300
$234.900
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
$1,499,858
$1,682,057
$1,714,133
$1,647,133
$1,746,231
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 33
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
STRIM
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS LIGHTING 0321 thru 0322
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Regular Street Lighting — 0321:
In the City, there are 1,685 NSP owned street lights; for the most part,
"over the roadway" lights attached to existing NSP service poles. The
funds in this program are used for rental fees and power.
Ornamental Street Lighting — 0322:
The City owns 558 ornamental street lights. Ornamental lights include
decorative or architectural lighting that has a unique design head and
pole, or in some cases, antique lighting. The City is responsible for all
parts and maintenance of the lights, including underground wiring and
painting of the poles. The funds in this program are expended on power
parts, replacement fixtures, poles and lamps
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oer.F - 3G
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
STREET LIGHTING
0321 THAU 0322
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
REGULAR - 0321
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
SO
50
53,150
53,150
$3,150
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0
0
1,000
1,000
1,000
4252 LIGHT 8 POWER
167,185
223.958
172,000
172.000
193.000
167,185
223.958
173.000
173.000
194.000
COMITIES:
4540 REPAIR PARTS
0
0
500
500
500
TOTAL STREET
LIGHTING REGULAR
$167.185
$223.958
$176,650
$176,650
$197.650
ORNAMENTAL - 0322
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$15.715
$15,085
$11.500
$11.500
$11.500
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0
275
1,000
1,000
1,000
4252 LIGHT & POWER
124,954
32.794
101.800
138.000
155,000
124.954
33.069
102,800
139.000
156.000
ODi110DITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
10,759
8,947
7,000
7,000
7,500
4540 REPAIR PARTS
3.885
3.077
6.000
6.000
6,500
14.644
12.024
13.000
13.000
14,000
TOTAL STREET
LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
$155.313
$60,178
$127.300
$163.500
$181.500
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING
$322,498
$284,136
$303,950
$340,150
$379,150
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 35
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
STREET Him SIGNS/
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SIGNS 0325
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Street Name Signs /Traffic Signs - 0325:
The funds for this program are used for the maintenance and
replacement of the City's 2,200 street name signs. These signs
usually last 6 to 7 years, however, most are replaced earlier due
to damages or vandalism at a rate of roughly 10% a year.
The traffic sign account covers maintenance and replacement of
approximately 2,500 traffic signs.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oer.F - 36
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC 8 STREET NAME SIGNS
Q325
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSOML SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
539,388
$28,040
$29.770
$29,500
$29,500
CONTRAC ML SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
500
500
CO IMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
11,134
12,975
14,000
7,500
8,000
4542 SIGNS 8 POSTS
15,273
15,612
15,330
15,000
16,000
4544 PAINT
2,849
140
2.000
1,000
1,100
29.256
28,727
31.330
23.500
25.100
TOTAL STREET N M SIGNS
568,644
$56,767
$61,100
$53,500
$55,100
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 37
FUND:
FUNCTION:
PUBLIC WORKS
AREA:
TRAFFIC CONTROL
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Traffic Signal Maintenance - 0330:
PROGRAM:
0330 TBRU 0335
The City owns and maintains six traffic signal systems, and in conjunction
with the State, maintains an additional six signal systems. Electronic
maintenance is performed down to the component level on all printed circuit
boards. Ninety percent of the funds from this account are applied toward
light and power with the remaining 108 directed towards parts, back -up
equipment and test equipment.
Pavement Marking - 0335:
The City sign shop, which is responsible for pavement marking, consists
of 2 men, 1 truck, 2 stripers, and 1 trailer. The bulk of the funds
for this account are directed towards the following projects:
Proiect Materials Used
- Center line striping of State aid streets 450 gallons paint
- Lane striping 250 gallons paint
- Painting legends & arrows on pavement and
parking lots; and 70 school crossings 50 gallons paint
Additionally, the sign shop is responsible for striping the City's 45
parking lots and painting the center line and messages on Cornelia and
Bredeson Park walking paths.
Also, the 4544 line item now includes permanent pavement marking materials.
We have found that some high traffic areas and concrete streets do not hold
paint very well. We have changed to different materials which last longer.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oacE - 39
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC CONTROL
0330 THRU 0335
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 14AINTENANCE -0330
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$8.298
$6.366
$8.400
$8.400
$8.400
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0
0
500
500
500
4252 LIGHT & POWER
41,704
38,954
40,000
40,000
45,000
4274 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
8.486
2.333
10.000
10.000
10.000
50.190
41,287
50.500
50.500
55.500
COMMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
391
390
1,000
1,000
1,100
4540 REPAIR PARTS
1.367
914
3.000
3,000
3.200
1.758
1.304
4,000
4.000
4.300
TOTAL TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
$60.246
$48.957
562.900
$62. 900
$68,200
PAVEMENT MARKING - 0335
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$14,806
$14.876
$13.540
$19,000
$19.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
0
500
500
500
CONIODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
4,431
1,017
2,000
2,000
2,100
4544 PAINT & PAVEMENT MARKING
7,228
10.506
15.165
12.000
13.500
11.659
11.523
17.165
14.000
15,600
TOTAL PAVEMENT NARKING
$26.465
$26.399
$31.205
$33.500
$35.100
TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL
586,711
$75,356
$94,105
$96,400
$103,300
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 39
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
BRIDGES/
PUBLIC NORRS GUARD RAIIS 0343
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Bridges /Guard Rails — 0343:
The sign shop is responsible for the sanding, priming and painting of
bridge rails and guideposts. There are 18 bridges and culverts in the
City. Major deck repairs are taken care of by outside contractors.
Additionally, there are numerous guard rail locations throughout the City
requiring periodic maintenance.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oerc 4n
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
BRIDGES/
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
GUARD RAILS
0343
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS - 0343
PERSDIUL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$4.376
$4.092
56.000
$10.000
$10.000
ODI TRAC1UILL SERVICES:
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
0
0
500
500
500
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,515
2,273
1,500
3,000
3,200
4546 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL
508
448
1.000
2.000
2.100
4.023
2.721
2.500
5,000
5.300
TOTAL BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS
$8,399
$6,813
$9,000
$15,500
$15,800
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 41
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
RETAnrnw upim
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS 1131II1TER iNCE 0344
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
There are approximately 50 retaining walls in the City. They are beginning to
show age for various reasons and are in need of repair. They are constructed of
timber, lannon stone and other landscaping materials. This program would provide
for materials, some contracted repairs and labor distributed from the general street
maintenance program.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
per.F G7
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
RETAINING WALLS
US"
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
7992
7990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
EO
EO
$0
EO
$6.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
$0
$0
EO
EO
52.000
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
$2.000
4604 LUMBER /STONE
10.000
$0
$0
$0
EO
$12.000
TOTAL RETAINING WALLS
EO
$0
EO
$0
$20.000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 43
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION:
PUBLIC WORKS
AREA:
SIDEWALKS - RAMPS
PARKING LOTS
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Sidewalks - Maintenance and Repair - 0365:
PROGRAM:
0365 TBRU 0375 - 30
Maintenance and repairs for the City's 17 miles of sidewalk begin in the
early spring with the sweeping of winter sand and proceed through the summer
and fall with maintenance on an as needed basis by the City street crews.
Sidewalks - Snow & Ice Removal - 0370:
Removal of snow from the City's 17 miles of sidewalk is another
responsibility of the street department. One snow plow /blower is
used to accomplish this task. Under normal conditions it takes 3 to 5
days to clear walks.
Parking Ramp Maintenance - 0375:
The City owns 3 parking ramps in downtown Edina. Each ramp consists of
3 levels with 302 spaces in the south ramp and 274 spaces in the north
ramp and 150 in the newest north ramp. The funds from this account are
allocated towards plowing, sweeping, lighting, and cleaning supplies and
contractual services.
Explanation of Change:
$10,000 of this budget has been removed to be assessed against the 50th and
France business area.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAM - "
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
SIDEWALKS - RAMPS
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
PARKING LOTS
Q366 TN081 0315
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
SIDEWALKS - MAINTENANCE
& REPAIR - 0365
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$4,149
$8,541
$8.000
$8.000
$8.000
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,406
2,777
2,800
2,000
2,100
4518 FILL
273
0
1,000
1,000
1,100
4524 BLACKTOP
404
2,790
1,000
1,000
1,100
4528 CONCRETE
599
166
2,000
2.000
2.100
2.682
5,733
6.800
6,000
6.400
TOTAL SIDEWALK -
RAIYTENAMM 9 REPAIR
$6.831
$14.274
$14.800
$14,000
$14,400
SIDEWALKS - SNOW &
ICE REMOVAL - 0370
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$7,000
87,000
57,000
4110 OVERTIME
2,000
2,000
2.000
$2,211
$10,321
9.000
9.000
9.000
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
0
305
500
500
500
TOTAL SIDEWALK - SNOW
S ICE REMIAL
$2,211
510,626
$9.500
$9.500
59,500
PARKING RAMP MAINTENANCE - 0375
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
52,000
52,000
81,000
4110 OVERTIME
1.000
1.000
1.000
$7.404
58.786
3.000
3.000
2.000
CONTRACTUILL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
250
0
4,000
4,000
4,000
4252 LIGHT AND POWER
30.831
34.816
28.400
23.000
30,000
31.081
34,816
32.400
27.000
34.000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
544
212
200
2,000
100
4512 CLEANING SUPPLIES
0
266
_200
400
100
4540 REPAIR PARTS
2.156
6,335
2,000
3,000
100
2.700
6.813
2.400
5.400
300
TOTAL PARKING
RAMP mm mum
541.185
$50,415
$37,800
$35.400
$36,300
CITY OF EDINA
ANNUAL BUDGET
PAGE - 45
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
SIDEWALKS - RAMPS
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC WORKS PARKING LOTS 0380
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Parking Lot Maintenance — 0380:
Funds for this program are directed toward maintaining the City's parking
lots. Maintenance includes sweeping, plowing and striping of the lots and
is accomplished by the street department.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
oacE - tb
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
SIDEWALKS - RAMPS
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC WORKS
PARKING LOTS
0380
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PARKING LOT
MAINTENANCE - 0380
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$1.085
$2.306
$6.000
$6.000
$3.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
622
0
500
500
500
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
144
359
250
250
500
4522 SAND, GRAVEL, 8 ROCK
0
2,154
1,000
1,000
1,100
4524 BLACKTOP
271
1,763
3,000
10,000
11,000
4526 ROAD OIL
0
0
2.000
2.000
2.100
415
4,276
6.250
13.250
14.700
TOTAL PANIKIMG LOTS
2.122
6.582
12.750
19.750
18.200
TOTAL SIDEWALKS - RAMPS
i PARKING LOTS
$52,349
$81,897
$74,850
$78,650
$78,400
o e � 1993 Annual Budget
Public Safety
Public Safety Overview
Public Safety - Distribution by Area
Fire (33.4%)
Animal Control (0.8%)
Health (5.0
Inspections (2. .
-,
ce (56.3%)
Public Safety - Distribution by Expenditure
Equ
Central Services (21 .4'
Commodities (1.3%)
Contractual Svs. (5.5%,'
Salaries (6 6.9 %)
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 47
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL — 10 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE PROTECTION 0420 thru 0430
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Police:
Personal services consists of 56 full time employees, community service officers
and part time dispatching help.
The City of Edina Police Department is called upon to perform many emerg-
ency and public service tasks throughout the year. In 1991, the department
responded to over 20,000 calls for service which involved medicals, fires,
emergencies, accidents, animal control problems, vehicle and residential lockouts,
thefts, damage to property, suspicious persons & vehicles, alarm responses as
well as public service and educational activities.
The City reports approximately 1,800 major Part I crimes such as burglary, robbery,
assault, etc., with an additional 2,200 misdemeanor or lessor crimes also reported..
Police respond to emergency calls within five minutes and to non - emergency calls
within ten minutes under normal conditions.
The Police Department is also responsible for educating the public in crime
prevention techniques, investigation of all felony crimes against persons and,
where warranted, other crimes as well.
Over 808 of the total Police budget is directly or indirectly spent on labor.
Labor is distributed with 798 dedicated to patrol functions, 158 for investigations
and 68 for administration.
The Police Department operates 1,095 shifts, 7 days a week, 24 hours per day and
maintains an average patrol strength of 5.2 officers at any given time.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
aerc - es
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE PROTECTION
0420 ttnv 0430
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
POLICE SERVICES - 420
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$2,414,233
$2,414,233
$2,525,396
4110 OVERTIME
105.510
37.500
55,000
$2.302,420
$2.432.657
2.519.743
2.451.733
2.580,396
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,167
4,296
4,000
2,000
2,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
19,308
(16,763)
19,000
12,110
19,000
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
748
4,847
950
650
950
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
532
1,352
350
350
350
4208 MILEAGE
4,890
4,036
300
300
300
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
26,606
37,672
36,000
28,300
38,000
4233 DATA PROCESSING
48,292
51,912
25,000
25,000
25,000
4262 LAUNDRY
294
382
500
500
500
4266 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
33,709
33,752
33,700
28,000
33,700
4268 TELETYPE SERVICE
1,372
1,369
2,320
2,320
2,320
4274 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
3,486
4,041
11,380
11,380
11,380
4283 RANGE RENTAL
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
4288 SERVICE CONTRACT- EQUIP.
19,029
7.158
11.700
11,700
11.700
168,433
137.054
148.200
125.610
148.200
COMMODITIES:
4502 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS
2,391
1,930
1,900
1,000
2,000
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
10,500
13,361
10,000
5,300
10,750
4508 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
3,779
3,028
2,700
2,700
2,900
4510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES
30
184
350
350
400
4572 AMMUNITION
7,398
7,358
7,600
7,600
7,900
4600 PRINTING
10,649
7,117
10,500
6,500
9,900
4642 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
1.556
662
1.100
1.100
1.200
$36.303
833.640
$34.150
$24.550
$35.050
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 49
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC SAFETr POLICE PROTECTION 0420 thru 0430
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Explanation of change:
Four expenditure items comprise the majority of the increase in the police
services area:
- $17,500 has been added to the overtime area to more accurately reflect costs
- $20,000 has been added for mandated training for police officers
- $11,000 has been added for sales tax liability in commodities and equipment
replacement
- $20,000 has been added above the normal central services increase.to pay for
the increasing cost of servicing the police vehicles through the equipment
operation budget (560). and costs associated with unbudgeted overtime.(PERA and
workers compensation).
1992 1993 %
Total Police.Budget $3,608,682 $3,837,519 6.3
Reserve Program - 0430:
The reserve program is comprised of the Senior Police Reserve (8 members),
Explorer Post 925 (20 members), the Edina Police Reserve (12 members) and the
Police Senior Volunteers (7 members).
Senior Police Reserves perform 640 hours of contract work ranging from crime
prevention to personnel recruiting.
Explorer Post 925 contributes approximately 2,000 hours of public services to
various community events and programs. This is in response to career orientation
and training provided by the Police Department.
The Edina Police Reserve serves the community in excess of 1,800 hours annually.
They perform work during special events and provide non - emergency service work
and patrol.
The Police senior volunteers work four hours a day, five days a week for a total
of 1,000 hours annually. Telephone answering, receptionist work and other
administrative tasks are performed.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 50
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE PROTECTION
0420 thru 0430
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
5570,000
$602,700
$614,700
5614,700
5654,708
4804 CITY HALL
45,600
47,160
48,192
48,192
50,352
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
135.600
143.100
159.960
159.960
174.840
751.200
792.960
822.852
822.852
879.900
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
108,222
162,291
125,000
162,287
171,123
4902 NEW
1.559
7.157
0
0
0
109.781
169.448
125.000
162.287
171.123
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES
53.368.137
$3.565,759
53.649.945
53.587.032
$3,814.669
RESERVE PROGRAM - 430
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
512.100
$13.200
514.000
514.850
$16.050
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
3,044
3,652
3,000
3,000
3,000
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
994
518
500
1,000
1,000
4266 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
2,387
2.466
2.000
2.000
2.000
6.425
6.636
5.500
6.000
6.000
CORNODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
351
312
300
300
300
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
0
439
500
500
500
TOTAL RESERVE PROfRUM
$18.876
$20.587
$20.300
521.650
$22,850
TOTAL POLICE PROTECTION
53,387,013
$3, 586,346
$3,670,245
$3,608,682
53,837,519
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 51
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PUBLIC SAFETY CIVILIBF DEFENSE 0460 - 46
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Civilian Defense:
Personal Services consist of (1/4) the time of Police Chief. This is a cumulative
estimate of Police department time of the Director, Coordinator and administrative
specialists.
The objective of the Civilian Defense program is to prepare the community for
disasters or emergencies - natural or man -made. This is accomplished by compliance
with Federal, State and County guidelines for emergency preparedness planning.
Action plans are developed and practiced at the City level. This activity
coupled with ten air warning sirens, ensures the operation of government and the
maintenance of emergency services during disasters.
1992 1993 $
Total Civilian Defense Budget $27,761 $28,894 4.1
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PACE - S2
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
0460
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$22,514
$16,422
$18,797
$18,797
$19,361
OO TRACiWL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
580
96
100
1,000
1,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
352
351
355
300
300
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
45
45
45
45
45
4252 LIGHT AND POWER
864
727
500
675
675
4256 TELEPHONE
0
0
0
90
90
4266 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
0
0
0
0
0
1,841
1,219
1,000
2,110
2,110
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
477
2,541
1,200
1,000
1,065
LQIIPIEIIT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
0
0
0
5,854
6,358
TOTAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE
$24,832
$20,182
$20,997
$27,761
$28,894
[_ITV OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 53
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GEIGMAL - 10 PUBLIC SAFETY AN114ALL CONTROL 0470
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Animal Control:
Personal services consist of one (1) full time person and part time help.
Animal control is provided 16 hours per day by augmenting the one Animal Control
Officer with CSO's responding to calls for service.
Animal control is a function of the Police Department. The Animal Control Officer
is responsible for the enforcement of the City's animal- related ordinances and
also assists City residents with animal control problems, both wild and domestic.
Approximately 3,000 calls for service are responded to annually.
Priorities for animal control are.the safety and protection of persons, the well-
being of the City's animal population, and protection of property.
1992 1993 $
Total Animal Control Budget $57,482 $54,466 (5.2)
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
PACE - 54
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
ANIMAL CONTROL
0470
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSOUL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$29,762
$29,762
$25,656
4110 OVERTIME
$1.500
1.500
1.500
$30.418
$29.345
31.262
31,262
27,156
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
264
180
200
650
650
4278 KENNEL SERVICES
5.428
5.116
5.200
5.500
5.750
5,692
5.296
5,400
6.150
6.400
CONMIODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
3.019
2,704
2,500
3.000
3.120
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
7,800
8,100
8,400
8,400
8,700
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
3.600
3.780
3,420
3,420
3.540
11.400
11.880
11.820
11.820
12.240
EWIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
12.102
0
0
5.250
5.550
TOTAL AMINAL CONTROL
$62,631
$49,225
$50,982
557,482
$54,466
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 55
FUND: I FUNCTION: I AREA: I PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 1 PUBLIC SAFETY I FIRE PROTECTION 1 0440
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Fire:
Personal Services consist of thirty (30) full time personnel, part time help
and fourteen (14) Volunteer Firefighters.
Services are provided in four primary areas: fire suppression, hazardous
materials response, emergency medical services and fire prevention.
The primary purpose of fire suppression is to provide an immediate response
to protect lives, property and the environment from fire and other
life- threatening conditions,,such as hazardous materials spills /release.
This response should place the first pumper on the scene within 7 minutes at
least 90% of the time. Typical actions are search, rescue, and removal of
persons in immediate danger, interior fire attack to stop fire development,
exterior fire streams to prevent fire extension, fire extinguishment and
necessary measures to minimize property damage by smoke, water, weather and
release of hazardous materials. Equipment consists of three (3) pumpers,
one (1) aerial tower and support vehicles. In 1991, 708 fire responses
included fires (structure, vehicles, outside) and public service emergency
calls. Fire calls have averaged around 700 for the past ten years.
The purpose of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to provide an immediate
and advanced life support response to the community's medical emergencies
resulting from accident, sudden illness or injury, and place an ambulance on
the scene within 6.8 minutes at least 908 of the time. Equipment consists
of two (ALS) paramedic ambulances. Services provide both immediate
emergency care and transportation to metro -area hospitals. Paramedics are
cross - trained as firefighters, and all firefighters are cross - trained to
emergency medical technician level. Emergency medical services also include
public information programs and training to better prepare citizens to
prevent or react to emergency medical situations. In 1991, medical calls
totalled 2,213. The trend in emergency calls is upward, increasing at an
average rate of 155 calls per year.
The goal of fire prevention activities is two -fold: first, to prevent fire
ignition whenever possible, and second, when fires do occur, to minimize
fire impact on lives and property by early fire detection, automatic fire
suppression, and limit fire extension with building compartmentation; also
maximize citizen survival by teaching proven fire safety techniques. All
Fire Department personnel are involved in public information programs and
annual inspection activities. Fire Inspectors typically make the
specialized permit and approval inspections.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 56
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE PROTECTION
044o
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$1,395,502
$1,395,413
$1,439,056
4110 OVERTIME
170.000
74.000
141.000
$1.452.594
$1.549.311
1.565.502
1.469.413
1.580.056
C011 RACT1ULL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
16,158
6,768
7,000
2,000
2,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
12,922
13,002
8,250
8,250
9,250
4204 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,028
850
1,000
1,000
1,000
4206 MEETING EXPENSE
361
959
500
500
500
4208 MILEAGE
0
122
200
200
225
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1,714
3,172
2,800
2,800
3,100
4233 DATA PROCESSING
1,215
570
1,000
5,000
5,000
4246 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
184
94
100
0
0
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7,363
(1,405)
9,000
14,700
15,000
4250 RUBBISH REMOVAL
1,880
1,496
1,200
600
1,000
4252 LIGHT AND POWER
11,017
11,208
11,150
10,000
11,500
4254 HEAT
5,968
4,298
5,000
8,000
7,000
4258 SEWER AND WATER
27
1,105
800
800
1,100
4262 LAUNDRY
2,673
2,597
2,700
2,700
2,900
4266 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
7,977
9,628
9,600
9,600
10,200
4274 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
3,695
5,850
3,500
2,300
2,600
4310 LICENSES AND PERMITS
40
318
200
200
200
74.222
60.632
64.000
68.650
72.575
COMMODITIES:
4502 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS
638
1,044
1,000
400
425
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
11,912
10,125
15,000
10,700
12,000
4508 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
94
343
900
900
950
4510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES
12,046
10,544
16,200
11,000
13,500
4512 CLEANING SUPPLIES
925
612
800
800
850
4516 OFFICE SUPPLIES
899
696
800
800
850
4540 REPAIR PARTS
2,664
1,995
2,300
2,300
2,300
4570 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
847
1,129
2,000
2,000
21000
4574 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
2,947
1,632
4,000
49000
4,000
4580 TOOLS
501
400
900
900
900
4608 TRAINING AIDS
757
2,140
2,100
2,000
2,200
4650 FIRE PREVENTION
1.049
1.287
1.300
1.300
1.400
$35.279
$31.947
$47.300
$31.100
$41.375
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 57
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GEIVEtAL - 10 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE PROTECTION 0440
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Explanation of Change:
Three areas constitute the major areas of change within the fire department
budget:
- $55,000 has been added to the fire overtime budget to more accurately
reflect costs
- $12,000 has been added to the overtime budget to be designated for
mandated state and federal training
- $14,000 has been added to equipment replacement, commodities and some
contractual services for sales tax for 1993.
1992 1993 $
Total Fire Budget $2,119,869 $2,274,682 7.3
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 58
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE PROTECTION
0440
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
$330,000
$341,712
$351,312
$351,312
$376,356
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
48.000
50.400
58.240
58.240
61.720
378.000
392.112
409,552
409.552
438.076
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
54,811
98,600
100,000
135,154
142,600
4902 NEW
1.736
0
0
0
0
56.547
98.600
100,000
135.154
142.600
TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION
$1,996,642
$2,132,602
$2,186,354
$2,119,869
$2,274,682
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 59
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL — 10 PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC HEALTH 0480
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Public Health:
Personal services consist of 2 & 1/3 full time employees and part time
help in this area.
The Health Department inspects food establishments, investigates foodborne
illness reports, inspects public swimming pools, investigates nuisance
complaints, investigates housing complaints, responds to concerns about the
Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act and provides laboratory support for food and
water analysis. The department contracts for personal public health services
such as home health care, family health, health promotion, and disease prevention
and control. The cost of the contracted services are as follows:
Home Health Care $ 78,482
Family Health 31,925
Health Promotion 11,972
Disease Prevention
and Control 10,641
Total $133,020
The Health Department provides staff support for the Edina Community
Health Services Advisory Committee and administers the development and
implementation of the Edina Community Health Service biannual plan. The
Department administers the City properties refuse collection contract and
serves as a resource for City employees' occupational health and safety.
In 1991, the Department performed 179 food establishment inspections, 643
swimming pool inspections, 51 nuisance investigations, 1 Minnesota Clean
Indoor Air complaint investigations, 12 housing complaint investigations
and analyzed 6,231 food and water samples for 10 local units of government.
1992 . 1993 %
Total Health Budget $324,280 $337,925 4.1
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 60
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC HEALTH
0480
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1991
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$120.043
$124,929
$131,482
$131,482
$137.861
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
112,295
121,745
127,905
127,904
133,020
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
1,166
1,383
1,280
1,100
1,100
4204 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
255
464
1,300
225
500
4208 MILEAGE
1,416
1,428
1,400
900
1,600
4262 LAUNDRY
112
0
115
115
115
115,244
125,020
132,000
130.244
136.335
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
9,048
5,939
6,000
2,700
2,800
4508 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
14
29
40
40
40 .
4600 PRINTING
77
317
70
50
50
9,139
6.285
6.110
2,790
2.890
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
38,400
38,880
40,080
40,080
42,060
4804 CITY HALL
3,240
3,360
3,420
3,420
3,600
4806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
4,800
4,920
5,328
5,328
5,568
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
4.200
4.380
3.780
3.780
3,960
50.640
51,540
52.608
52,608
55,188
EQUIPNW:
4901 REPLACEMENT
0
649
3.000
7,156
5.651
TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH
$295,066
$308,423
$325,200
$324,280
$337,925
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 61
FUND:
GEN ERRL - 10
Inspections:
FUNCTION:
PUBLIC SAFETr
AREA: PROGRAM:
INSPECTIONS 1 0490
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Personal services consist of 4 full time employees and part time help
in this area.
The Inspections Department issues 900 building permits per year. They also
enforce. the Uniform Building Code, the State Building Code and make over 8,500
inspections a year. The department also issues over 900 plumbing permits and
1,200 mechanical permits per year.
The Building Department also receives several complaint calls per week from
residents which are investigated promptly.
Total Inspections Budget
1992 1993 %
$265,819 $278,841 4.9
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
vacE - 62
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PUBLIC SAFETY
INSPECTIONS
0490
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
8197.129
$218.817
5225.500
8183.900
$192.279
COIRitACiWL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,341
1,850
2,500
2,500
2,500
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
2,211
1,606
2,400
2,400
2,400
4204 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
608
1,117
500
500
600
4208 MILEAGE
50
2
100
100
100
7.210
4.575
5.500
5.500
5.600
Ct>ARIDITIES:
4502 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS
79
0
500
500
500
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,404
426
600
600
600
4600 PRINTING
0
1.508
1.100
1.000
2.000
2.483
1.934
2.200
2,100
3.100
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
46,S00
48,960
52,560
52,560
54,960
4804 CITY HALL
7,200
7,476
7,608
7,608
8,076
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
7.200
7.440
7.080
7.080
7.440
61.200
63.876
67.248
67.248
70.476
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
12,289
11,655
0
7,071
7,386
4902 NEW
14.226
0
0
0
0
26.515
11.655
0
7.071
7,386
TCITAL INSPECTIONS
$294,537
$300,857
$300,448
$265,819
$278,841
1993 Annual Budget
Park & Recreation
Park & Recreation Overview
Park & Recreation - Distribution by Area
Maintenance (70.3%',
Park & Recreation - Distribution by Expenditure
Equip
Central Svcs. (23.2%)
Commodities (9.2%)
Contractual Services k I -+. 1 /0)
-
?2.7 %)
(7.0%)
(48.4 %)
1t
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 63
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PARR & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 0600
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Administration:
Personal Services consist of 6 and 1/3 full time employees and part
time help in this area.
Responsibility is to administer and maintain the entire Park and
Recreation Department, including 37 parks totaling 1,200 acres of park
property; revenue facilities (Golf Course, Arena, Swimming Pool, Art Center,
Gun Range, Edinborough Park, and Centennial Lakes Park); administering a senior
citizen's center and programing it; adaptive recreation program, administering and
scheduling adult and youth recreational programs and eleven athletic associations
(Baseball Association, Basketball Association, Girls' Athletic Association, Youth
softball Association, Swim Club, Wrestling Association, Figure skating Club,
Football Association and Soccer Association), and working closely.in operation an
administration of the Edina Garden Council, the Edina Historical Society and
the Edina Museum.
Explanation of change:
The park department will incur approximately $25,000 of the sales tax liability
in its commodity and equipment replacement budgets.
1992 1993 $
Total Park Recreation Budget $1,715,774 $1,789,733 4.3
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE . 64
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
ADMINISTRATION
0600
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
5239.277
$283.704
5287.470
5276.606
$289.445
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
29,659
9,617
5,000
5,000
5,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
5,485
2,298
3,300
3,300
2,000
4204 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,465
1,868
1,200
1,200
1,000
4208 MILEAGE
1 ;513
2,737
1.000
1.000
2.000
38.122
16,520
10,500
10.500
10.000
COMITIES:
4502 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
20
0
100
100
100
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
658
2,609
2,500
1,000
1,000
4516 OFFICE SUPPLIES
236
259
400
500
500
4600 PRINTING
6.542
13.236
5.000
1.000
8.000
7.456
16.104
8.000
2.600
9.600
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
66,050
69,120
70,320
70,320
73,920
4804 CITY HALL
14,950
15,600
15,900
15,900
16,800
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
4.200
4,380
4.860
4,860
5.100
85.200
89,100
91.080
91,080
95.820
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
2.077
3,064
0
1.914
2.057
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
$372,132
5408,492
8397,050
$382,700
$406,922
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 65
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PARR & RECREATION RECREATION 0621 THRU 0623
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Athletic Activities - 0621:
These funds are used for recreational program equipment for 308 coach pitch
participants, eleven athletic associations and all adult programs.
The eleven athletic associations are: Edina Baseball Association, Edina
Basketball Association, Edina Girl's Athletic Association, Edina Hockey
Association, Edina Gymnastics Association, Edina Youth Softball, Edina
Swim Club, Edina Wrestling Association, Braemar City of Lakes Figure
Skating Club, Edina Football Association, & Edina Soccer Association
Skating and Hockey - 0622:
These funds are used for all supervision, general supplies, and equipment
for eleven warming houses, ten hockey rinks and general skating. This
consists of a ten week season, seven days a week from December 15 to February
15 and can stay open longer - weather permitting.
Tennis Instruction - 0623:
These funds are used for supervision and instruction for 384 students, and
tennis nets and supplies for 44 tennis courts.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PACE - 66
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
RECREATION
0621 THRU 0623
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1991
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES - 0621
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
54,255
$2,317
$2,000
$2,000
$2,060
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
86
37
50
100
100
4208 MILEAGE
0
153
100
100
100
86
190
150
200
200
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
6,260
8,590
7,000
7,500
8,000
TOTAL ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
$10,601
$11,097
$9,150
$9,700
$10,260
SKATING & HOCKEY - 0622
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
521,142
518,595
$23,000
$23,000
523,000
COITRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,328
9.404
5,250
2,500
3,000
CO MW ITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
730
758
750
600
700
TOTAL SKATING & HOCKEY
$31,200
$28,757
$29,000
$26,100
$26,700
TENNIS INSTRUCTION - 0623
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
$3.070
$7,384
$7,200
$8,000
58.000
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,945
3,606
2,070
2,000
2,150
TOTAL TENNIS INSTRUCTION
$6,015
$10,990
59,270
$10,000
$10,150
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 67
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL -'10 PARR & RECREATION RECREATION 0624 TMU 0625
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Playgrounds - 0624:
These funds are_used for the operation of 13 playground programs, a traveling
puppet trailer, and general supplies.
This year a new age group was introduced ages 5 - 10 is now 6 - 10..
Swimming ng Instruction - 0625:
These funds are used for the busing of 1,000 students to the municipal
pool and for swimming instruction of them.
Recreational Participant Programs:
Revenues for the T -ball program, swimming instruction program, the tennis
instruction program, and the playground program are all based on increases
and decreases depending on the number of participants in each program.
Proaram 1991 1992
Coach Pitch 220 308
Tennis Instruction 544 384
Swimming Instruction 621 689
Playground 508 317
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 68
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK 8 RECREATION
RECREATION
0621 THRU 0628
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ADOPTED
PLAYGROUND 8 THEATER - 0624
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
$16,242
$21,861
520,250
$14,000
$14,420
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
470
453
500
100
200
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7,184
4,281
5,000
4,000
4,300
TOTAL PLAYGRMW Ti THEATER
$23,896
526,595
$25,750
$18,100
$18,920
SWIMMING INSTRUCTION - 0625
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
$12,434
$12,891
59,000
$9,000
$9,300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4282 BUS RENTAL
(29,712)
0
9,000
9,000
9,000
4284 POOL RENTAL
5,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
(24,712)
10,000
14,000
14,000
14,000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
148
848
300
300
500
TOTAL SWIMMING INSIRIICTION
($12,130)
$23,739
$23,300
$23,300
$23,800
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 69
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL — 10 PARR & RECREATION RECREATION 0627 TMW 0628
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Miscellaneous and Special Activities - 0627:
These funds are used for programming in music and parks and
special activities instructors.
Senior Citizens - 0628:
These funds are used for personnel, maintenance, janitorial services
and general supplies for the Senior Citizen's center.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 70
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
RECREATION
0627 THRU 0628
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
MISCELLANEOUS & SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES - 0627
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
56.297
$1.538
$800
$7.000
$7,500
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8.678
4.673
200
3.500
3.500
CONWITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,384
3,035
2,050
2,000
3,200
4508 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
117
166
150
200
200
4596 MUSIC SUPPLIES
729
803
200
1,000
900 .
4600 PRINTING
189
648
350
4.800
5.000
3,419
4,652
2.750
8.000
9.300
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS i
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
518,394
$10.863
$3.750
$18.500
$20.300
SENIOR CITIZENS - 0628
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4120 PAYROLL
53.391
58.374
$11.000
54,000
$7.200
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4250 RUBBISH REMOVAL
0
0
0
800
800
4256 TELEPHONE
1,431
1,660
1,500
1,500
1,500
4282 BUS RENTAL
0
7.479
0
0
0
1.431
9.139
1.500
2.300
2.300
CONCODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7.035
6.536
4.750
4,750
5.000
TOTAL SENIOR CITIZENS
$11,857
$24.049
$17.250
511,050
$14.500
TOTAL RECREATION
$89,833
$136,090
$117,470
5116,750
5124,630-
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 71
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION:
PARR & RECREATION
AREA:
PARK NMJ3PTE1®NCS
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
PROGRAM:
Park Maintenance
PAYROLL
SUMMARY - DISTRIBUTION
Park Maintenance consists of fifteen (15) personnel which include the
following positions:
One (1) Foreman
Two (2) Heavy Equipment Operators
Eleven (11) Equipment Operators
One (1) Janitor
Park & Recreation:
RECREATION:
MISC. & SPEC. ACT.
S 7,500
SENIOR CENTER
3,000
MAINTENANCE:
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
65,000
MOWING
59,000
FIELD MAINTENANCE
60,000
GENERAL TURF CARE
47,000
FORESTRY
83,000
LITTER REMOVAL
14,000
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
84,500
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
MAINTENANCE
11,500
SKATING RINK MAINT. 81,600
S516,100
CHARGED TO OTHER FUNDS:
CITY HALL S 10,400
SWIMMING POOL 8,600
GOLF COURSE 5,600
RECREATION CENTER 7,500
ART CENTER 81000
TOTAL PARR
MAINTENANCE PAYROLL $ 556,200
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA PROrmRAM:
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 73
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PARR & RECREATION 1+GlIATE3MNCS 0641 thru 0642
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
General Maintenance - 0640:
This account handles the paid leave, training and equipment maintenance
for the park maintenance programs. Paid leave includes sick, vacation,
and holiday pay.
Mowing - 0641:
Funds from this account are used for maintenance of all manicured grass
areas consisting of 422 different areas all mowed and maintained with
a minimum of 10 days between cuttings. All scheduled athletic fields
are maintained every 5 days.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 74
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK 8 RECREATION
MAINTENANCE
0641 Tau 0642
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 0640
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAID LEAVE
$83,675
576,088
$63,325
$59,500
565,000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
2,922
2,053
2,600
2,500
2,500
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
180,000
186,000
181,200
181,200
186,204
4806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
13,200
14,220
15,300
15,300
16,140
4808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION
96,000
100,980
106,380
106,380
116,580
289,200
301,200
302,880
302,880
318,924
TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
$375,797
$379,341
$368,805
$364.880
$386,424
MOWING - 0641
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
562,197
571,385
560,700
$53.800
$60,000
C011TRACIWL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0
632
0
0
0
CONI1 ITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,262
3,083
650
1,000
1,100
TOTAL MOWING
563.459
$75,100
$61,350
$54,800
$61,100
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 75
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROPRAM:
GEREPAL - 10 PARR & RECREATION MAINTERANCE 0643
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Field Maintenance — 0642:
All sports fields are specially prepared for scheduled games. These
fields are dragged and field lined with a chalk material. A special
mixture (agricultural lime) is used each spring for filling in holes
and regrading is done as needed during the playing season. All of the
field areas are fertilized each year, the grass is treated with a weed
chemical and also a soil sterilent is sued on the infield playing
surface. The grassy playing surface in all of these parks are seeded,
aerated and sometimes sod is replaced in worn out areas.
This account is supplemented by a $5 field use fee from participants.
General Turf Care — 0643:
The funds in this program provide for all city properties and general
park maintenance. This includes the contracted spraying of weeds (dandelions)
twice a year.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 76
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
MAINTENANCE
0642 TIM 0643
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1943
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
FIELD MAINTENANCE- 0642
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$83.957
$76,895
$96.700
$55,200
$59.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
598
0
100
500
500
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
504
134
100
500
500
1,102
134
200
1,000
1.000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
279
6,225
4,600
3,000
4,000
4558 FERTILIZER
4,062
1,425
1,000.
1,000
1,200 .
4561 INFIELD MIXTURE
716
1,407
1,400
1,500
1,400
4562 SOD & BLACK DIRT
0
0
600
1,500
0
4563 LINE MARKING POWDER
4,114
2,994
2,000
2,000
2,500
4566 WEED SPRAY
699
892
1,000
1,000
1,100
4568 SEED
0
0
1,000
1.000
1.000
9.870
12,943
11,600
11,000
11.200
TOTAL FIELD MAINTENANCE
$94,929
$89.972
$108.500
$67,200
$71.200
GENERAL TURF CARE -0643
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$0
$0
$55,600
$35,100
$37,000
4110 OVERTIME
0
0
10.000
10.000
10,000
48.022
65.418
65.600
45,100
47,000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17,200
559
500
5,000
5,000
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,279
5,296
4,000
6,000
5,000
4310 LICENSES AND PERMITS
80
10
0
0
0
19,559
5.865
4,500
11,000
10.000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
501
930
2,000
4,000
3,000
4522 SAND, GRAVEL, & ROCK
826
384
1,000
1,000
1,000
4558 FERTILIZER
3,447
5,147
5,000
5,000
4,500
4562 SOD & BLACK DIRT
2,106
907
2,000
3,000
3,000
4566 WEED SPRAY
3,969
1,587
3,000
8,000
8,000
4568 SEED
4.334
1.234
1.000
3,000
3.000
15.183
10,189
14,000
24,000
22.500
TOTAL GENERAL TURF CARE
$82.764
$81.472
$84,100
$80.100
$79.500
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 77
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION: AREA:
PARR & RECREATION I MM331TENANCB
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
PROGRAM:
0644 THRU 0645
Forestry 0644:
This account includes contracted tree removal and stump removal of boulevard
and park trees that are diseased. This account provides for maintenance of tree
trimming on boulevard and park trees. It also includes $5,000 for boulevard tree
replacement (20 trees), $5,000 for new park trees and shrubbery, and restocking
of the park tree nursery.
Litter Removal - 0645:
These funds are used for maintenance and removal of all trash from 37
park areas on a daily basis in season or a weekly basis throughout the,
entire year. This also includes the purchase of trash containers.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAM - 78
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK 8 RECREATION
MAINTENANCE
0644 TBRU 0645
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
FORESTRY - 0644
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
75,200
75,200
78,000
4110 OVERTIME
110
5,000
5.000
$81.277
$89.314
75.310
80.200
83.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
18,580
19,263
10,000
10,000
10,000
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
15,033
75,901
38,800
36,000
36,000
4250 RUBBISH REMOVAL
6,493
8,885
30.000
10.000
10.000
40.106
104.049
78,800
56.000
56.000
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,837
1,357
1,000
1,000
1,000
4560 PLANTING 8 TREES
5,414
4,891
4,000
12,000
9,000
4562 SOD 8 BLACK DIRT
0
5,698
750
3,000
6,000
4580 TOOLS
2.362
2.063
1.000
3.000
3,000
9.613
14.009
6.750
19.000
19.000
TOTAL FQtESTiCT
130,996
207.372
160.860
155.200
158.000
LITTER REMOVAL - 0645
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
21.149
14.366
16.325
17,000
14.000
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4250 RUBBISH REMOVAL
4.584
4,716
3,275
5,000
5.000
COMMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5.180
5.734
13.150
10.000
10.000
TOTAL LITTER REMOVAL
$30,913
$24.816
$32,750
$32.000
$29.000.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 79
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 PARR & RECREATION GCB 0646
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Building Maintenance — 0646:
These funds are used for the maintenance, repair and cleaning of 16
buildings in the park system. These funds are also used for the upkeep and
new construction of the 10 hockey rinks in the park system.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL.BUDGET PACE - 80
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
MAINTENANCE
0646
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 0646
PERSONAL SERVICES:. -
4105 PAYROLL
$83,896
$92,025
$109,078
581,494
584,500
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
1,154
2,000
3,000
3,000
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12,006
18,011
18,000
20,000
17,000
4252 LIGHT & POKER
63,207
52,233
53,000
55,000
57,000
4254 HEAT
13,938
12,557
13,000
15,000
16,000
4256 TELEPHONE
1,649
2,495
3,000
2,000
2,000
4262 LAUNDRY
4,143
3,610
4,000
4,000
4,000
94,943
90,060
93,000
99,000
99,000
C(lIIODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
19,507
20,258
20,000
20,000
21,000
4540 REPAIR PARTS
7,943
7,123
15,000
15,000
14,000
4580 TOOLS
588
2,464
2,000
2,000
3,000
4604 LUMBER
7,323
7,678
11,400
11,400
11,000
4606 LAMPS & FIXTURES
0
353
1,000
1,000
1,000
35.361
37,876
49,400
49,400
50,000
TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE
$214,200
$219,961
$251,478
$229,894
$233,500
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 81
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION: I AREA:
PARK & RECREATION INTENANCE
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Paths & Hard Surface Maintenance - 0647:
PROGRAM:
0647 THRU 0650
These funds are used for the maintenance of all hard surface areas
within the park system. This includes resurfacing of 46 tennis courts,
resurfacing and maintaining 6 hard surface basketball courts, maintenance
of 27 playground areas, and maintenance and surfacing of 10 miles of
walking and bicycling paths within the park system.
The maintenance and replacement of the playground equipment in all 27
sites which we are now scheduling a total replacement of all equipment on
a ten to fifteen year basis depending on the piece of equipment with an
annual equipment allowance scheduled in this budget area of $30,000.
PARK
ESTIMATED VALUE
PARR
ESTIMATED VALUE
Alden
$ 23,125
McGuire
$ 7,750
Arden
12,363
Normandale
29,160
Arneson Acres
1,375
Pamela
13,713
Birchcrest
27,250
Strachauer
23,500
Braemar
14,913
Tingdale
24,575
Chowen
10,413
Todd
31,613
Lake Cornelia
52,863
Utley
4,250
Cornelia School
Van Valkenburg
Countryside
28,500
Walnut Ridge
6,813
Creek Valley
Weber
14,250
44th Street
5,813
William Wardell
Lewis 5,875
Garden
27,475
Wooddale
36,875
Heights
17,063
York
9,813
Highlands
27,750
Yorktown
Lake Edina
8,375
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
$465,465
Skating Rink Maintenance - 0648:
These funds are used for flooding and maintaining an operation of
10 hockey rinks and 14 general skating areas.
Equipment - 0650:
This account provides funding for the replacement of existing equipment
and the purchase of new equipment for all park programs.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 82
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
PARK & RECREATION
MAINTENANCE
0647 TIIRU 0660
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
MAINTENANCE - 0647
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$17,818
512,763
$11.160
$11.000
$11.500
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
16.457
64,962
43,500
45.000
45,000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
454
1,531
3,300
2,000
2,000
4524 BLACKTOP
2,924
21
1,000
1,000
1,000 .
4526 ROAD OIL
498
0
1,000
1,000
1,000
3.876
1.552
5,300
4,000
4,000
TOTAL PATHS & HARD
SURFACE M11INi3lANCE
38. 151
79.277
59.960
60.000
60.500
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE - 0648
,
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
77,599
85,274
73.640
80.800
81,600
COMM'ITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,958
963
1,000
4,000
4,000
4540 REPAIR PARTS
232
2,105
2,000
3.000
3,000
2.190
3.068
3.000
7,000
7,000
TOTAL SKATING RINK MAINT.
79.789
88.342
76.640
87,800
88.600
EQUIPMENT - 0650
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
101,338
85.341
84.450
84. 450
90,357
TOTAL EWIPNETT
101,338
85.341
84,450
84.450
90.357
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE
$1,212,336
$1,330,994
51,288,893
81,216,324
$1,258,181
owe 1993 Annual Budget
Non'- Departmental
Non- Departmental Overview
Non - Departmental - Distribution by Area
Reserve Rebuild (24.7
Commissions (20.5%
sssments (1 1.1 %)
Contingencies (14.8%)
Plan (2 8.9 %)
Non - Departmental - Distribution by Expenditure
ities (1.5%)
Contr. Svs. (33.8%)
Central Svs. (0.0%)
ies (0.0 %)
Equipment (40.0%)
I,I I T ur r-wmj%
FUND:
Gffi PAL - 10
fkuas 1 S2 2r%10% T
A��\VAV YV V V/r
FUNCTION: AREA:
HON- DEPBBL
EXPENDITURES I CONTINGENCIES
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
PAUS - tss
PROGRAM:
0500
1992 1993 %
Total Contingencies Budget $60,000 $60,000 0.0
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 84
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
CONTINGENCIES
0500
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4207
$94.266
$37,527
$40,000
560,000
$60.000
TOTAL COIRINGEIICIES
$94,266
$37,527
$40,000
560,000
$60,000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 85
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
NON- DEPARVEWTAL Q►PITAL PLAN
G NntAL - 10 EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATION 0502
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Capital Plan Appropriation:
This appropriation reflects the amount the operating budget
contributes to the capital plan.
1992 1993 %
Total Capital Plan Budget $117,000 $117,000 '0.0
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 96
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
CAPITAL PLAN
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION
0502
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
7992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
EWIPNW:
4902
$115.000
$117.000
$117.000
5117.000
$117.000
TOTAL CAPITAL PLAN
APPROPRIATION
$115,000
$117,000
$117,000
$117,000
$117,000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 87
FUND:
FUNCTION:
NON- DEPAMMEN1'AL
AREA
SPECIAL ASSESSIODiTS
OH CITr PROPERTr
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Special Assessments on City Property:
PROGRAM:
0503
City owned properties are subject to special assessments for various
improvement projects. This program provides funds to pay for these
assessments. The budget also reflects the costs necessary to pay for
mandated truth in taxation mailing.
1991 1992 %
Total Special Assessments Budget $45,000 $45,000 0.0
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 88
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
ON CITY PROPERTY
0503
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
SPECIAL ASSESSI E]RS_
4922
$42.951
$51.450
$42.450
$45.000
$45.000
TOTAL SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS
$42,951
$51,450
$42,450
$45,000
$45,000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 89
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
HON- DEPARTHEN'fAL RESERVE
GENERAL - 10 EXPENDITURES 1 REBUILD
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Explanation of change:
The reserve rebuild budget is new program for 1993.
Over the past two years the undesignated fund balance in the general fund
has been reduced significantly. From 1987 through 1990 the undesignated
fund balance ranged from 1.3 to 1.5 million dollars. At the end of 1991,
the undesignated fund balance is approximately $580,000. We anticipate
another decrease in fund balance for 1992 due to the shortage in tax
dollars (abatements) of approximately $230,000. This would put the
undesignated fund balance at a level of $350,000.
This raises some concerns for the future:
- In the future we may have to fund general fund expenses during the
year with short term borrowing. This would be accomplished with
tax anticipation warrants with a resultant interest cost and loss of
interest revenue.
- We may not have the ability to fund: a purchase of land, loss in the
insurance area, or any other unanticipated major expenditure without
long.term borrowing.
- The state auditor, bond consultants and bond rating agencies have all
suggested that our level of fund balance is extremely low and may
have an impact on bond rating and the cost of borrowing.
We propose to begin a program to set aside $100,000 a year to re- establish
a more acceptable level of fund balance.
1992 1993
Total Reserve Budget $0 $100,000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 90
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
REBUILD
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
RESERVE
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
$0
$0
SO
$0
$100.000
QESIRVE REBUILD
$0
$0
SO
$0
$100,000
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 91
FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM:
HON - DEPARTMENTAL COMMISSIONS &
GENERAL - 10 EXPENDITURES SPECIAL PROJECTS
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Human Relations Commission - 0504:
The Human Relations Commission is comprised of 12 members and is an
advisory body to the City Council in the areas of human rights, human
relations, and human service. The commission meets regularly 12 times
a year and additionally hold no fault grievance conferences on an
average of 4 times per month.
Storefront /Youth Action -
$36,300
Senior Community Services -
6,700
Cornerstone Advocacy Service -
4,000
Share -A -Home -
2,350
United Battered Families Network -
2,550
VEAP -
3,950
West Suburban Mediation Center -
1,150
Projects /Planning -
2.000
$59,000
Projects pertain to activities such as forums or training sessions. Planning
would be the contracting of South Hennepin's services over and above the
budgeted work plan.
Fireworks - 0505:
Fireworks display to be presented after the band concert on the
fourth of July.
Suburban Rate Authority - 0506:
The Suburban Rate Authority oversees utility rates affecting
suburban communities.
Recycling commission - 0507:
Explanation of change:
The recycling budget is proposed to be removed from the general fund
budget and would be placed on the Utility Bills effective January 1,
1993.
If the recycling budget is left in the general fund, its net cost would
be $187,409 which represents an increase of $27,423 over 1992's budget.
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 92
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
COMMISSIONS & SPECIAL
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
PROJECTS
0504 thru 0507
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION -0504
OONTRACIUILL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$52,325
$53,500
$57,000
$57,290
$59,000
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
33
56
100
200
250
4204 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
236
225
250
250
200
4224 CHEMICAL HEALTH
125
112
200
500
500
4280 EDUCATION PROGRAM
495
(118)
450
450
450
TOTAL MUMAM
RELATIONS COMMISSION
53.214
53,775
58.000
58.690
60.400
FIREWORKS - 0505
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7.000
5.212
7.000
6.000
6.000
TOTAL FIREIRNt[S
7.000
5.212
7.000
6,000
6.000
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY - 0506
OOMTRACIUILL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,500
3,750
3.750
3.750
3,750
TOTAL SUBURBAN
RATE AUTHORITT
3,500
3.750
3.750
3.750
3.750
RECYCLING PROGRAM - 0507
COXTRACnIRL SERVICES:
4201 PROF. SERVICES
92.221
157.269
150.000
159.986
0
TOTAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
92.221
157.269
150.000
159.986
0
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 93
FUND:
70-A-; -1_--C1TVA1=1wU4
FUNCTION:
NON- DEPARTKENTAL
AREA:
CGIMSSIONS &
SPECIAL PROJECTS
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Centennial Celebration - 0508:
PROGRAM:
The Centennial Commission recommended $25,000 for 1987 and $25,000 for
1988 to support the Centennial Celebration.
South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency — 0508:
The purpose of the organization is to assist the four communities in
identifying and meeting their human service needs through research,
planning and coordination. Activities include the CSSA report to Hennepin
County, the annual planning process, the South Hennepin Mental Health
Advisory Committee and the coordination of emergency services in south
Hennepin County.
Loss Subsidy — Operating Funds — 0509:
.1992 1993 8
Total Commissions & Special Projects Budget $239,528 $83,050 -65.3
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 94
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
COMMISSIONS 8 SPECIAL
GENERAL - 10
EXPENDITURES
PROJECTS
0508 thru 0509
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION - 0508
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$7.503
$7,250
SO
$0
SO
TOTAL CEffFMIAL
7.503
7,250
0
0
0
SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICE
COUNCIL - 0508
OOYiRACi1LLL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14.394
6,769
5,552
11,102
12,900
TOTAL SOM HENNEPIN
SERVICE CODICIL
14.394
6.769
5,552
11,102
12,900
LOSS SUBSIDY - OPERATING
FUNDS -0509
(YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 1989)
4201 SWIMMING POOL
0
0
0
0
0
EDINSOROUGH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ART CENTER
5,757
0
0
0
0
TOTAL LOSS SLWIDT
5,757
0
0
0
0
TOTAL COMMISSIONS i
SPECIAL PROJECTS
$183,589
$234,025
$224,302
$239,528
$83,050
1993 Annual Budget
Appendix
e 1993 Annual Budget
Central Services
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 95
FUND: I FUNCTION: I AREA: I PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10 1 CENTRAL SERVICES I GffiOCRRL 1 0510
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
General - 510:
Central services - General includes general and administrative expenses for the
City. These expenses are allocated to operating departments and other funds
according to usage.
Explanation of change:
The major share of this increase is represented in PERA /FICA - $129,840. Seventy
percent of this total is allocated to the enterprise funds for the additional
labor hours they are incurring in their full time and part time budgets. The
remaining 30% is supported by the general fund.
An additional $10 per month per employee is included for the flexible benefits
plan.
DISTRIBUTION
ALLOCATION TO OPERATING DEPARTMENTS:
ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUNDS:
ANNUAL
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
MONTHLY
MAYOR & COUNCIL
$ 18,720
$ 1,560
CITY HALL
$ 12,900
$ 1,075
ADMINISTRATION
92,580
7,715
PUBLIC WKS -BLDG.
7,920
660
PLANNING
44,100
3,675
EQUIP. OPERATION
59,040
4,920
FINANCE
54,480
4,540
ART CENTER
18,780
1,565
ELECTIONS
8,520
710
POOL
6,000
500
ASSESSING
64,704
5,392
GOLF COURSE
120,480
10,040
PUBLIC WORKS:
ARENA
47,388
3,949
ADMINISTRATION
'23,700
1,975
GUN RANGE
1,620
135
ENGINEERING
77,700
6,475
EDINBOROUGH
102,480
8,540
GENERAL
308,100
25,675
UTILITIES
222,600
18,550
POLICE
654,708
54,559
LIQUOR - 50TH
35,400
2,950
ANIMAL CONTROL
8,700
725
LIQUOR - YORK
65,520
5,460
FIRE
376,356
31,363
LIQUOR - GRANDVIEW
59,100
4,925
HEALTH
42,060
3,505
RECYCLING
7,080
590
INSPECTIONS
54,960
4,580
COMMUNICATIONS
14,700;
1,225
PARKS:
S781,008
,S 65,084
ADMINISTRATION
73,920
6,160
MAINTENANCE
186,204
15,517
S
2,089,512
174,126
TOTAL $
2,870,520
----- - - - - --
-----------
$239,210
--- - - - - --
--- - - - - --
1992
1993
$
Total Central
Services General Budget
$2,654,040 $2,870,520
8.1'
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 96
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
6amu L - 10
C8rnIAL SERVICES
GEIKERAL
0510
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1943
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4145 PENSIONS
81,081,652
$1,348,133
$1,332,000
$1,174,500
$1,304,340
4156 EMPLOYER'S SHARE-HOSPITAL-
LIFE 8 INCOME PROTECTION
INSURANCE
422,371
498,384
700,000
685,000
729,840
4212 PERSONNEL
12,800
100,374
13,000
20,000
20,000
4226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
531
7,541
9,000
8,000
8,000
4256 TELEPHONE
63,834
57,469
50,000
54,000
54,000
4260 INSURANCE
537,886
609,362
550,000
600,000
640,000
4288 SERVICE CONTRACT - EQUIP.
17,738
9,989
16,000
15,200
16,000
4290 POSTAGE
49,236
60,701
60,000
63.000
62.000
2,186,048
2.691.953
2,730,000
2,619.700
2.834,180
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
40,083
35,823
27.%000
15,000
17,000
--
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
26,922
5,000
2,000
19,340
19,340
4902 NEW
0
0
0
0
0
26,922
5,000
2.000
19.340
19,340
TOTAL GENERAL
$2,253,053
$2,732,776
$2,759,000
$2,654,040
$2,870,520
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 97
FUND:
FUNCTION:
1 I
AREA:
PROGRAM:
1
GENERAL - 10
CENTRAL SERVICES
CITY
0520
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
City Hall — 520:
Personal services include l and 1/2 full time employees, part time help,
Public Works help and Park Maintenance help.
This program provides for the operation and maintenance of the City Hall.
Operating costs are allocated to departments on the basis of space occupied.
DISTRIBUTION
ALLOCATION TO OTHER OPERATING DEPARTMENTS
ANNUAL
MONTHLY
MAYOR & COUNCIL
$ 11,100
$ 925
ADMINISTRATION
17,400
1,450
PLANNING
5,880
490
FINANCE
7,524
627
ASSESSING
6,660
555
PUBLIC WORKS:
ADMINISTRATION
3,540
295
ENGINEERING
7,284
607
POLICE
50,352
4,196
HEALTH
3,600
300
INSPECTIONS
8,076
673
PARKS
16,800
1,400
UTILITIES
10,380
865
COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
375
TOTAL $153,096 $12,758
1992 1993 $
Total City Hall Budget $145,980 $153,096 4.8
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 98
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
GENERAL - 10
CENTRAL SERVICES
CITY HALL
0520
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSORAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$71,494
$69,999
573,000
$66,270
568,696
-4110 OVERTIME
1.970
2.637
2.000
- 1.000
1.000
73.464
72.636
75.000
67.270
69,696
OOIRRACIWL SERVICES:
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIR
7,740
3,861
4,000
4,750
5,000
4250 RUBBISH SERVICE
1,880
1,492
2,000
2,000
2,000
4252 LIGHT 8 POWER
20,629
19,809
16,000
16,000
18,400
4254 HEAT
7,932
6,715
10,000
10,000
10,000
4258 SEWER 8 WATER
1,989
1,432
1,000
1,000
1,000
4262 LAUNDRY
1.538
1.456
2,000
2.200
2,200
41.708
34.765
35.000
35.950
38,600
COMITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,580
4,045
5,500
5,500
5,000
4512 CLEANING SUPPLIES
1,490
1,755
1,400
1,400
1,900
4514 PAPER SUPPLIES
9,767
10,476
8,500
8,500
10,000
4540 REPAIR PARTS
20.698
12.949
15,000
15.000
15.000
35.535
29.225
30.400
30.400
31.900
CEYiRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
12.000
12,240
12.360
12.360
12.900
TOTAL CITY HALL
$162,707
$148,866
5152,760
$145,980
$153,096
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 99
FUND
FUNCTION: AREA:
PUBLIC W0PKS
CENTRAL SERVICES I BUILDING
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Public Works Building - 540:
PROGRAM:
0540
Personal services consist of one full time employee, public works help
and overtime.
The function of the public works building is to provide a shelter for
equipment maintenance operations and provide stockroom and office
facilities for public works personnel. A large part of this account
is directed towards rubbish hauling, light and power, heat and fuel oil
and repair parts for building.,
ALLOCATION TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS:
ANNUAL
MONTHLY
PUBLIC WORKS
$16,056
$ 1,338
HEALTH
5,568
464
PARKS
16,140
1,345
EQUIPMENT OPERATION
117,900
9,825
UTILITIES
12,792
1.066
TOTAL
$168,456
$14,038
Total Public Works Building Budget
1992 1993 %
$161,340 $168,456 4.4
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 100
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
RELIC HDitCS
GE183U L - 10
CENTRAL SERVICES
BUILDING
0540
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
$51,215
$32,306
$30,500
548,527
$44,899
4110 OVERTIME
923
1.661
650
2.000
2.100
52.138
33.967
31.150
50.527
46.999
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
327
1,079
2,000
2,000
2,000
4250 RUBBISH HAULING
6,911
6,939
6,800
4,000
' 71-000
4252 LIGHT & POWER
28,888
25,407
26,800
23,500
26,500
4254 HEAT & FUEL OIL
36,158
34,783
36,185
38,000
38,000
4258 SEWER & WATER
1.199
1.282
1.000
1,000
1.300
73.483
69.490
72.785
68.500
74,800
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5,852
5,073
5,000
5,500
6,000
4512 CLEANING SUPPLIES
8,926
7,856
8,000
6,000
7,000
4540 REPAIR PARTS
29.787
20.523
22.000
20.000
21.500
44.565
33.452
35.000
31.500
34.500
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
7.200
7.440
7.440
7.440
7.920
EWIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
3,210
5,726
2,500
3,373
4,237
4902 NEW
0
1.912
0
0
0
3.210
7.638
2.500
3.373
4.237
TOTAL PUBLIC
WOM BUILDING
$180,596
$151,987
$148,875
$161,340
$168,456
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 101
FUND:
GENERAL - 10
FUNCTION:
CENTRAL SERVICES
AREA:
ZQUrPXENT
OPERATION
PROGRAM:
0560
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Equipment Operation - 560:
Personal services consist
of 5 full time employees in this area.
This account provides for
operation and maintenance of all City vehicles.
A large part of the operation costs are attributed to the purchase of fuel
for City equipment. The
shop foreman and 5 mechanics are the personnel
responsible for the City's
45 cars, 79 trucks, pickups and vans, 150 off -
road vehicles, 6 trailers
and l bus. Additionally, the public works shop
is responsible for all maintenance
equipment and power tools. Costs of
equipment operation are charges to operating departments and other funds
on the basis of use.
Explanation of Change:
The equipment operation area accounts for $25,000 of the sales tax liability which i
included under the commodities
and equipment replacement budgets.
DISTRIBUTION
ALLOCATION TO DEPARTMENTS:
ANNUAL
MONTHLY ANNUAL MONTHLY
ADMINISTRATION $6,240
$ 520 CHARGED TO OTHER FUNDS:
PLANNING 1,980
165 POOL $ 2,112 $ 176
ASSESSING 3,120
260 GOLF COURSE 14,280 1,190
PUBLIC WORKS:
ARENA 3,900 325
ADMINISTRATION 1,920
160. CENT LAKES /EDINB 2,160 180
ENGINEERING 12,000
1,000 UTILITIES 75.276 6,273
SUPERVISION 1,920
160 $97,728 $ 8,144
MAINTENANCE 428,580
35,715
POLICE 174,840
14,570
ANIMAL CONTROL 3,540
295
FIRE 61,716
5,143
HEALTH 3,960
330
INSPECTIONS 7,440
620
PARKS:
ADMINISTRATION 5,100
425
MAINTENANCE 116.580
9,715
$828,936
S69,078 TOTAL $926,664 $ 77,222
---------- --- - - - - --
1992 1993 $
Total Equipment Operation Budget $871,612 926,664 6.3
CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 102
FUND:
FUNCTION:
AREA:
PROGRAM:
EQUIPMENT
6903 Al - 10
CENTRAL SERVICES
OPERATION
0560
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1992
1990
1991
1993
ACCT. DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
ADOPTED
PERSONAL SERVICES:
4105 PAYROLL
5217,233
5212,916
5247,703
$228,488
$236,383
4110 OVERTIME
2.236
9.817
10.000
2.000
2.000
$219.469
$222.733
$257.703
8230.488
$238.383
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
4202 CONTINUING EDUCATION
0
100
1,000
1,000
1,000
4233 DATA PROCESSING
3,535
275
3,000
3,000
3,000
4248 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
41,130
50,518
50,000
42,000
42,000
4262 LAUNDRY
3,265
3,326
5,000
5,000
5,000
4294 RA610 SERVICE
7,063
6,873
6,060
6,000
7,000
4296 CAR WASHES
3,946
8,087
8,000
5,000
6,000
4310 LICENSE FEES 8 PERMITS
21,090
9.239
15.000
15.000
16.000
80.029
78.418
88.060
77.000
80.000
COMMODITIES:
4504 GENERAL SUPPLIES
18,451
19,126
15,000
12,000
14,500
4540 REPAIR PARTS
123,791
167,542
150,000
120,000
135,000
4580 REPLACEMENT OF TOOLS
5,592
8,250
4,500
4,500
5,500
4610 WELDING SUPPLIES
3,988
6,937
4,500
4,500
5,500
4612 GAS & FUEL OIL.
150,611
158,347
150,000
150,000
157,500
4616 TIRES & TUBES
22,207
34,895
24,000
24,000
27,000
4618 LUBRICANTS
11,224
12,071
11,000
11,000
12,000
4620 ACCESSORIES
64,762
53,138
50,000
50,000
53,500
4642 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
2,104
2.939
2.000
2.000
3.000
402.730
463.245
411.000
378.000
413.500
CENTRAL SERVICES:
4802 GENERAL
56,400
56,640
56,640
56,640
59,040
4806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
98.400
105,660
113,100
113.100
117.900
154,800
162,300
169.740
169.740
176.940
EQUIPMENT:
4901 REPLACEMENT
51,512
0
4,662
16,384
17,841
4902 NEW
2.295.
0
0
0
51.512
2.295
4.662
16.384
17.841
TOTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION
$908,540
$928,991
$931,165
5871,612
$926,664
°e " 1993 Annual Budget
Capital Plan
City of Edina
Five Year Capital Plan
1993
Internal Fund Projects
1993 1994 1995 1996
PAGE - 103
1997
REVENUE SOURCES
$90,000
587,000
542,000
$12,000
312,000
INTERNAL PROJECTS
Operating Budget - Page 87
$117,000
$180,000
$180,000
$180,000
$180,000
Working Capital Fund
196,000
381,000
789,000
484,000
2,000
Utility Transfer - Rent
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
Developer's Fund
20.000
20.000
20.000
20.000
20.000
TOTAL REVENUE
$433,000
$681,000
$1,089,000
$784,000
$302,000
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
City Hall
$90,000
587,000
542,000
$12,000
312,000
Public Works:
Public Works Building
60,000
66,000
66,000
0
0
Miscellaneous
5,000
0
0
0
0
Parking Ramps
0
25,000
0
25,000
0
Parking Lots
0
0
0
0
0
Bridges
0
150,000
100,000
50,000
50,000
Sidewalks & Paths
13,000
23,000
286,000
207,000
0
Police
85,000
0
50,000
0
40,000
Fire
40,000
130,000
345,000
490,000
200,000
Parks
120,000
180,000
180,000
0
0
Art Center
10,000
10,000
10,000
0
0
Arena
10,000
10,000
10,000
0
0
TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTS
5433,000
$681,000
51,089,000
$784,000
$302,000
CITY BALL:
Office Furniture
Rooftop Units/Ducting
Replace/Reinsutate Roof
Heating System
TOTAL CITY BALL
PUBLIC WORKS:
PUB. WORKS BUILDING
New Roof
Salt Storage
TOTAL PW BUILDING
PUB. WORKS - MISC.
Colony Way Area Lighting
TOTAL PW NISCELLANEMIS
PUB. WORKS - PARKING RAMPS
Sealing Csurface 8 joint):
49 1/2 Street
51st Street
TOTAL PW PARKING RAIDS
PUB.WORKS - PARKING LOTS:
50th Street Area - resurface
TOTAL PW PARKING LOTS
PUB.WORKS - BRIDGES
Browndale to Minnehaha Creek
West 56th Street
TOTAL PW BRIDGES
City of Edina
Five Year Capital Plan
1993
Internal Fund Projects
1993 1994 1995 1996
PAGE - 104
1997
$12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000
$90,000
75,000
30,000
$90.000 587,000 $42.000 $12.000 512.000
550,000 $66,000 $66,000
10.000
$60.000 566.000 S66.000 SO SO
$5.000
$5.000 50 $O $0 $O
$25,000
$25.000
SO S25.000 50 $25.000 SO
SO SO SO SO SO
5100,000 550,000
50.000 50.000 S50.000 550.000
SO 5150.000 5100.000 S50,000 $50.000
PAGE - 105
City of Edina
Five Year Capital Plan
1993
Internal Fund Projects
1943 1994 1995 1996 1997
PUBLIC WORKS CONTIMM:
PUB. WORKS - SIDEWALKS & PATHS
Parklawn - from Gallagher to
France Avenue $13,000
W. 63rd & Ridgeview from Wyman
to Ridgeview Dr. $23,000
McCauley Tr. South & McCauley Tr.
North from Valley View to Gleason
County 158-Link Rd. to County 62
Braemar Golf Course
Lincoln Dr. from W. 7th to 1000
feet south
Xerxes, W.70th to Yorktown Park
Ohms Lane from W.72nd to W.74th
W.60th from France to Xerxes
TOTAL SIDEWALKS & PATHS $13.000 $23.000
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 78.000 264.000
$138,000
148,000
$105,000
16,000
19,000
23,000
44,000
$286.000 $207.000 s0
452.000 282.000 50.000
City of Edina
Five year Capital Plan
1993
Internal Fund Projects
1993 1994 1995 1996
POLICE DEPAR7NM:
PAGE - 106
1997
- Mobile Data Terminals $85,000
Alarm Monitoring Computer 50,000
800 MHZ Upgrade 40.000
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT $85.000 $0 $50.000 SO $40.000
FIRE DEPARTNW:
Fire Station No. 2 $300,000 $300,000
Building Maintenance Fund $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Opticomm Phase I 30,000
Rescue No. 3 100,000
Support Vehicle 20,000
UHF 800 MHZ Portable 35,000
Engine No. 4
180,000
Remodel - Station No. 1
$200.000
TOTAL FIRE 0EPA1R7WW
$40.000
$130.000 $345.000 5490.000 $200.000
PARK:
Wooddale - Playground Safety Surface
$10,000
Walnut Ridge - Playgrnd Safety Surf.
10,000
Braemar Park - Rebuild Tennis Courts
30,000
No ar. Le - Playgrnd Safety Surface
10,000
Lake Cornelia - Playground Upgrade &
safety surface
15,000
Arneson Acres - Development
10,000
Miscellaneous Park Redevelopment
10,000
Sr.Center- Redevelop, Table, Chairs,
& Equipment .
25,000
Creek Valley - Upgrade Warming House
& regrade
$35,000
Cornelia School - Upgrade Warm. House
40,000
Weber - Playground Equipment
20,000
Wooddale - Upgrade field & irrigate
25,000
Utley - Upgrade park
25,000
Arneson Acres - Planting & Structure
10,000
Miscellaneous Park Redevelopment
25,000
PARKS:
Countryside - Upgrade Building,
fields, 8 playground equip.
Nonterdale - Upgrade field &
warming house
Todd - Upgrade fields, parking
Lot and remove house
Arneson Acres - Planting .&
structures
Miscellaneous Park Redevelopment
Total Parks
ART CENTER:
Building Renovation
TOTAL ART CENTER
ARENA:
Building Renovation
TOTAL ARENA
TOTAL INTERNAL FUNDING
City of Edina
Five Year Capital Plan
1993
Internal Furl Projects
1993 1994 1995
PAGE - 107
1996 1997
$50,000
20,000
50,000
20,000
40.000
$120.000 $180,000 $180.000 $0 80
510.000 810.000 $10.000
$10,000 810.000 $10.000 80 SO
$10.000 $10.000 $10.000
$10.000 810.000 510.000 SO SO
$433,000 5681,000 $1,089,000 $784,000 $302,000