HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-21_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 21, 1992
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such
items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of September 8, 1992
* II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. PROCLAMATION - Disability Employment and Awareness Month
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pdss. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval - PRD -2 Planned Residence
District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District for Vernon Hill Addition -
Generally located north of Crosstown Highway, south of Vernon Av and west of
Gleason Rd
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. New Nine Hole Golf Course - Braemar (Continue 10/5/92)
* B. 50th & France Pedestrian Lights
Agenda
Edina City Council
September 21, 1992
Page 2
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Amendment of Council Minutes of July 6, 1992
B. Normandale Golf Course Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Findings
of Fact
C. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 15, 1992
D. Thielen Av/Wood End In Access
E. Metro 2015
F. Appointment of Election Judges - General Election 11/03/92
VI. PETITIONS /COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition for Street Lighting - Valley View Road & Moccasin Valley Rd
Residents
B. Memorandum Regarding Traffic Speed - Trillium Ln and Lantana Ln Residents
C. Scott Harr Letter - Aircraft Noise
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
A. Hennepin County Milfoil Control Program
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
I%. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
X. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 09/21/92: Total $1,163,767.91 and
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 09/17/82: $390,453.13
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Oct 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Mon Oct 19 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Nov 2 Regular Council Meeting
Tues Nov 3- GENERAL /CITY ELECTION
Mon
Nov
16
Regular
Council Meeting
Mon
Nov
30
Truth in
Taxation Hearing - 1993 Budget
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Polls Open 8 :00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
7:00 P.M. Council Chamber.
o
o
\`CO�IAAA t//
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, there are more than 600,000 people with disabilities in Minnesota,
making them the largest minority group in the State; and.
WHEREAS, many people with disabilities are living independently in Minnesota
and are participating in education,.social, religious, recreational and
community activities; and
WHEREAS, residents of our community need to become more aware of the talents
and capabilities of people with disabilities through their inclusion in the
total community environment; and
WHEREAS, the continuing existence of unfair discrimination and prejudice
denies people with disabilities the chance to compete on an equal basis and to
pursue those opportunities for which our free society is justifiably famous;
and
WHEREAS, a significant effort is being made statewide to eliminate barriers to
employment, housing, transportation, education and public accommodations for
persons with disabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has recognized employment as a
major issue for persons with disabilities and has designated the month of
October as National Disability Awareness Month; and
WHEREAS,,the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights
Act require employers to make reasonable accommodation to the known disability
of a qualified applicant or employee. -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Peggy Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of Edina, do
hereby proclaim the month of October, 1992, to be:
DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT AND AWARENESS MONTH
in the City of Edina, Minnesota. .
ADOPTED this 21st day of September, 1992.
1
MAYOR PRO -TEM
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice and
Richards. Commissioner Smith entered the meeting at 7:03 P.M. after adoption
of the Consent Agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was
seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by
Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve HRA
Minutes of August 17, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR DEED AMENDED - CENTENNIAL LAKES
Executive Director Hughes presented the following background information on
the Centennial Lakes development project:
Overview of Project
The Redevelopment Agreement and the Contract for Deed for the Centennial Lakes
development closed in October of 1988. The Redevelopment Agreement was
executed by the HRA and South Edina Development Corporation (SED). A Contract
for Deed was executed by the HRA and the estate of Fred W. Hedberg (Hedberg).
The Redevelopment Agreement dealt primarily with Phase 1 of the Centennial
Lakes project which included a multi- screen movie theater, a medical building,
a retail plaza, an assisted condominium development, and a 250,000 square foot
multi- tenant office building. At this time, all Phase 1 private improvements
have been completed (or are nearly complete) with the exception of the 250,000
square foot office building. All Phase 1 public improvements (acquisition and
initial development of Central Park and North Park and abutting roadways) have
been completed.
In connection with Phase 1, the Redevelopment Agreement with SED required the
payment of City dedication fees of $3 million of which $1.6 million has been
paid. The remaining $1.4 million is due in one month. These payments were
guaranteed by Northland Land Company, an affiliate of SED. The Redevelopment
Agreement also provided for a payment of $1 million in 1995 and an additional
payment of $1 million in 1998. The 1995 and 1998 payments were not guaranteed
to the same extent as the initial $3 million payment.
SED and the HRA also executed a shortfall agreement whereby SED guaranteed a
minimum amount of taxes from the Phase 1 private improvements. The shortfall
agreement provided that if taxes are not generated in the minimum amount, SED
or its guarantor, Northland Land Company, would make up the difference.
The Contract for Deed between the Hedbergs and the HRA required the annual
payment of principal and interest commencing in 1988. The Redevelopment
Agreement with SED required that SED make all payments required by the
Contract for Deed. A payment was made on the contract in 1989, however,
payments due in 1990 and in 1991 have not been made (the 1990 payment had been
deferred by Hedberg in consideration of the 1989 payment).
Current Situation
- The final installment of the initial City dedication is due in
approximately one month. The amount of this installment is $1.4 million
plus approximately $200,000 in interest and payment of this installment
is guaranteed by Northland Land Company. The assets of Northland Land
Company are primarily real estate holdings in Mendota Heights and Eagan.
- SED, and therefore the HRA, are technically in default of the Contract
for Deed due to the non - payment of the installment due in 1991. It is
very doubtful that SED will pay the next installment due in
approximately one month. No notice of default has been issued by
Hedberg and, in staff's opinion, cancellation of the Contract for Deed
by Hedberg is not imminent.
- According to the approved development plan, the majority of Phase 2
Centennial Lakes developments are office uses. The office market
continues to be depressed and the realization of a major office
statement south of 76th Street is unlikely for the near term. Less
intensive office developments are much more likely.
- Based upon the market for high- density office development, the payment
of the additional City dedication fees due in 1995 and 1998 are not
feasible in SED's judgement. Therefore, in consideration of the payment
of the $1.4 million plus interest which is due in October 1992, SED has
requested relief from the payments due in 1995 and 1998.
Proposed Amendments
Based upon the current situation, staff, SED and Hedberg have negotiated the
following amendments:
Amendment to Contract for Deed
The proposed amendment to the Contract for Deed contains the following major
elements:
1) The current interest rate on the unpaid principal balance is nine
percent. The amendment eliminates the interest provision and in its
place provides for a payment in lieu of interest whenever a principal
payment is made. The payment in lieu of interest is based upon the
increase in the Consumer Price Index. This change effectively reduces
the interest rate from nine percent to approximately three percent under
current conditions.
2) The amendment eliminates the requirement to purchase land intended for
residential purposes along with land intended for office purposes.
Given the current real estate environment, such a requirement is no
longer necessary.
3) Land which is subject to the Contract for Deed is currently exempt from
real estate taxes. The contract, however, provides that if such land
becomes taxable, the HRA is liable for the payment of such taxes. The
HRA, in turn, has passed that obligation on to SED. The amended
Contract for Deed provides that the HRA is not liable for the payment of
taxes which could result from a third party decision (the Court or the
County) that the property no longer qualifies for tax exempt status.
4) SED currently owns fee title to the lot for the Phase 1 office building.
The amended Contract for Deed permits the swapping of land on a square
foot per square foot basis between the Phase 1 office lot and land
subject to the Contract for Deed.
5) The amended contract provides for the grant of a storm sewer easement
across the contract property which was inadvertently omitted from the
original contract.
Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement and Shortfall Agreement
The proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement and Shortfall Agreement
contains the following major elements:
1) The amendment recognizes that the office development may utilize a less
intensive development than originally planned.
2) The existing Redevelopment Agreement gives the HRA absolute authority
over the transfer of the Phase 1 office parcel to any other developer.
The amended contract provides that the HRA still retains authority over
such transfers but must be reasonable in exercising its authority.
3) The $1 million payments due in 1995 and 1998 have been eliminated.
Instead, City dedication fees would be required in connection with
developments on the following basis:
A. For residential developments: the greater of $.30 per square foot
of land area or $800 per dwelling unit.
B. For commercial developments: the greater of $.65 per square foot
of land area or $1.00 per square foot of net rentable floor area.
Based upon this formula, the City would receive a minimum dedication of
approximately $500,000. If the balance of Centennial Lakes were
completed as envisioned by the Master Plan, the City would receive
approximately the $2 million that was first envisioned. Such payments
would be made only in connection with development that actually occurs.
4) The Shortfall Agreement has been amended to provide that any
development, except assisted condominium units, undertaken by the
developer anywhere on the Phase 2 Centennial Lakes site, constitutes a
credit against the developer's shortfall liability. Under the present
agreement, only development which occurs on the Phase 1 office site acts
as a credit.
Reasons for Approval of Amendments
1) The prospects for the development of Phase 2 of Centennial Lakes are
significantly different than they were in October of 1988. The Contract
for Deed and the Development Agreement must more accurately reflect
today's development environment. In this respect, the City contribution
.!
requirements provide a method whereby the City will receive, at a
minimum, a traditional parkland dedication and at a maximum the fees
that we bargained for in 1988.
2) The current developer is in the best position to accomplish the further
development of this property.
3) The prospects of collecting on the shortfall agreement (if required) is
much greater if the obligor on such payments remains the current
developer.
4) The HRA's position, with respect to the Contract for Deed and the future
acquisition of Phase 2 Centennial Lakes properties is improved.
5) The City is assured of receiving the $1.4 million plus interest payment
which is due in October.
Based on these reasons, staff would recommend that the HRA approve the
amendments to the Contract for Deed and the Redevelopment Agreement.
Following discussion and questions on the proposed amendments, Commissioner
Kelly moved adoption of the following resolutions:
RESOLUTION AMENDING REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AND SHORTFALL AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL LASES
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (BRA)
hereby approves the amendment, as presented, to the Redevelopment Agreement
and the amendment as presented to the Shortfall Agreement for Phase 1
Centennial Lakes, dated September 30, 1998, and executed by the BRA and South
Edina Development Corporation (SED);
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman and Secretary of the Edina Housing
and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) be authorized and directed to execute the
amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement and the amendment to the Shortfall
Agreement.
RESOLUTION AMENDING CONTRACT FOR DEED
FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (BRA)
hereby approves the amendment, as presented, to the Contract for Deed, dated
October 3, 1988, and executed by the BRA and the estate of Fred W. Hedberg
(Hedberg);
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman and Secretary of the Edina Housing
and Redevelopment Authority (BRA) be authorized and directed to execute the
amendment to the Contract for Deed.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolutions adopted.
*CIAINS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by
Commissioner Paulus to approve payment of the following BRA claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated September 3,.1992, and consisting of one
page totalling $53,720.23.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
HRA
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:44 PM
COUNCIL
DATE 9/21%92 page 1
CHECK #.. DATE
CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR
rrrrrr• r• rrrrrr rrrrr r• rrrrrrr•••
„....DESCRIPTION. INVOICE
PROGRAM OBJECT.—
a.rr•rrrrftr rirrrrrrrrriYrrr
......
12305
•rrr•rrrrr•r•rr
09/21/92
r••
$3,751.00
rr•••
ALDO INC
r• rrrrrr •rrrr�rrL��.r••rr•rr•.biir
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME
017389
CENTENNIAL LAK
rrr- rrrrr.rrrr'-
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$3,751.00*
12306
09/21/92
$365.77
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66335
50TH STREET
PRO FEE ARCH/
< *>
$365.77*
12307
09/21/92
$21.00
BYRNE, TRUDIE
PARKING PERMITS
122
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
$21.00*
12308
09/21/92
$15,135.83
DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY
MISCELLANEOUS
0724
GRANDVIEW
MISC
<*>
$15,135.83*
12309
09/21/92
$869.50
DORSEY & WHITNEY
PROFESSIONAL FEES LEG
289743
CENTENNIAL LAK
PRO FEES LEG/
< *>
$869.50*
12310
09/21/92
$8,062.01
MILLER & SCHROEDER I
INTEREST OTHER
091092
CENTENNIAL LAK
INTEREST OTHE
< *>
$8,062.01*
12311
09/21/92
$7,200.00
NORDQUIST SIGN COMPA
PARKS
15361
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$7,200.00*
12312
09/21/92
$1,796.42
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
PARKS
081792
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$1,796.42*
$37,201.53*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:36 PM
FUND • 01
$37,201.53
$37,201.53•
u
page 1
G
0
e i v
o
. a
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item-
II.
A.
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
El
Information Only
F
Date:
SEPTEMBER 21, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject:
Z-92-2-and S-92-2,
(�
To Council
Planned Residence
Action
❑Motion
District PRD -2 , to
R -2, Double Dwelling
Unit District. Ver",
x I
Resolution
non Hill, David
Carlson Compaay. Company.
5Z
Ordinance
❑Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed
rezoning Iand subdivision.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report.
The Planning Commission approval is conditioned on the granting of
the proposed front street setback variances by the Zoning Board of
Appeals. The variances will be considered by the Board at its
October 1, 1992, meeting.
LOCATION MAP
�E
* �d . �` ■Ins
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
N.0 M B ER Z -92 -2 and S -92 -2
L O C A T 10 N South of Vernon Avenue and north of Vernon Court
REQUEST Rezoning , PRD -2 , Planned Residence District to R-2,
Double.Dwelling Unit District and Plat Approval.
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF-
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 1992
7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair, J. Palmer, N. Faust,
Johnson, H. McClelland, D.
Workinger, C. Ingwalson, D. Byron
MEMBERS ABSENT: G. Johnson, V. Shaw
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
R. Hale, L.
Runyan, G.
Commissioner Ingwalson moved approval of the August 29, 1992,
meeting minutes. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
Z -92 -2 Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Residence
District PRD -2, to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit
District
and
S -92 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval, Vernon Hill
Addition - David Carlson Company, Inc.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property
measures slightly over four acres in size and is vacant. The.
development tract contains two parcels and includes all remaining
vacant property fronting on Vernon Court. Mr. Larsen added a
petition to rezone the property to R -2 and plat eight double
bungalow lots has been presented for approval.
Mr.__ Larsen explained the R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District
requires a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of
15,000 square feet. The eight proposed lots all exceed 90 feet in
width and range in area from 20,100 to 22,350 square feet in area.
Mr. Larsen stated all lots meet or exceed zoning ordinance
requirements for R -2 lots.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the R -2 district requires a minimum
front street setback of 30 feet. Mr. Larsen said the conceptual
site plan submitted by the developer illustrates front street
setbacks ranging from approximately 20 feet to 35 feet with most
units providing a 25 foot setback. Thus, five and 10 foot front
setback variances are suggested. The reduced front setback is
suggested to minimize the impact on steep slopes and reduce the
height of required retaining walls. Mr. Larsen told the commission
the proposed setback variances must be considered by the Zoning
Board of Appeals in a separate action. Mr. Larsen explained that
the site plans and unit plans were _submitted to show the developers
intentions and are not requirements of the requested zoning.
The subject property is designated as suitable to low density
attached residential by the City Comprehensive Plan. Double
bungalow development is consistent with this designation. During
the past several years three different development proposals have
been approved for the westerly 3.2 acres of this tract. In 1986,
a rezoning to PRD -3 was approved for a 15 unit townhouse
development. In 1987, a five lot, 10 unit double bungalow
development was approved. Most recently, a 12 unit, PRD -2
development was approved in the summer of 1990. All of these
developments were consistent with the six unit per acre density
allowed by the low density attached residential classification of
the property.
Mr. Larsen reminded the commission previous proposals on this
property were complicated by pending tax forfeiture actions. The
property has since gone tax forfeit and was purchased by the
developer at the state tax forfeit auction.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed rezoning is consistent with
the City's Comprehensive Plan and. the proposed lots comply, with the
requirements of the R -2 zoning district. The density of the
development is consistent with past approvals given development
proposals for this property.
Staff recommends preliminary rezoning approval and preliminary
plat approval subject to:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Final Plat Approval
The proponent, Mr. David Carlson was present.
Commissioner Byron questioned why the developer .chose to
rezone from PRD -2 to R -2. Mr. Larsen explained that townhouse
developments require different platting procedures and setbacks.
Mr. Larsen said the developer also wanted potential buyers to be
able to own 1/2 of the unit and yard area.
.Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen what are the required
sideyard setbacks for this proposal. Mr. Larsen said R -2 zoning
requires a sideyard setback of 10 feet for a single story building.
Increased setback would be' required if the building' height was
increased.,
Commissioner Faust questioned Mr. Carlson on the market values
of the proposed townhouses. Mr. Carlson responded that the base
price of each unit would be $199,000. With upgrades most units
would be in the $225 -$250 thousand range.
Commissioner Workinger asked the time frame on when the
variance would be heard. Mr. Larsen said the request for a
variance typically would be heard either. before final rezoning
approval or after.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if the council could
grant the variance if they choose. Mr. Larsen said the council can
grant the variance, but staff is suggesting that the proponents go
through the normal variance procedure.
Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Carlson when he plans to begin
construction on the units if approval is granted. Mr. Carlson said
he plans to begin construction in early spring.
Commissioner Johnson noted that in his review of the plans
there appears to be no access to the rearyard. Commissioner
Johnson inquired if that is the case, will the hill remain wild.
Mr. Carlson said it is his intent to leave the hill in it's natural
state and not provide access to the rearyard. Commissioner Johnson
asked Mr. Carlson what he ascertains will be the highest point.of
the retaining walls. Mr. Carlson responded that the retaining
walls will be constructed with a European process that will tier
them, angling them back, and at one point the walls will be as high
as 24 feet.
Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Carlson if he would be willing to
provide a conservation easement above the retaining walls. Mr.
Carlson said he has not considered a conservation easement but
would be willing to look into it if the commission felt it was
necessary.
Commissioner Johnson noted that the drainage would probably be
Class A and questioned if the city engineer would study drainage,
retaining walls etc.. Mr. Larsen said the engineering department
will review the proposal studying the retaining walls as well as
drainage_. Mr. Larsen said utility easements will be recommended as
well.
Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Larsen where the frontyard
setback are determined.' Mr. Larsen explained the frontyard
setbacks-are determined from the property line and in this instance
that may be the curb. Continuing, Commissioner Johnson asked Mr.
Larsen if at the closest point as the frontyard setbacks decrease
could a unit be as close as 10 feet from the curb. Mr. Larsen said
according to the plans the nearest unit to. the curb could be around
12 feet. Continuing, Mr. Larsen pointed out the street is very
J isolated and impact on neighboring properties is minimal, almost
non - existent. He stated staff desired less disturbance of the
hill, which resulted in the need for frontyard setback variances.
Mr. Larsen noted that the planning department will have the
engineering department review this proposal .and if they recommend
larger frontyard setbacks we would agree.
Commissioner Workinger asked what the setbacks are between the
existing Gleason Court development and the proposed development.
Mr. Larsen said the setbacks are sideyard to rearyard.
Chairman Palmer stated he was pleased to see that, the
proponent acquired the end piece on Vernon Court. He said that
piece creates a finer_ proposal and will make the area more
cohesive.
Commissioner Runyan.moved to recommend preliminary rezoning
and preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions.
Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. Commissioner Hale
asked if they would accept an amendment requiring a conservation
easement above the retaining wall. The amendment was accepted.
All voted aye; motion carried.
0
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 21 1922
2-92 -2 Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Residence
District PRD -2, to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit
District
and
S -92 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval, Vernon Hill
Addition - David Carlson Company, Inc.
General
Location: South of Vernon Avenue - north of Vernon Court
The subject property measures slightly over four acres in size
and is vacant. The development tract contains two parcels and
included all remaining vacant property fronting on Vernon Court.
A petition to rezoned the property to R -2 and plat eight double
bungalow lots has been presented for approval.
The R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District requires a minimum lot
width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. The
eight proposed lots all exceed 90 feet in width and range in area
from 20,100 to 22,350 square feet in area. Thus, all lots meet or
exceed zoning ordinance requirements for R -2 lots.
The R -2 district requires a minimum front street setback of 30
feet. The conceptual site plan submitted by the developer
illustrates a front street setback ranging from 20 feet to 35 feet
with most units providing a 25 foot setback. Thus, five and 10
foot front setback variances are suggested. The reduced front
setback is suggested to minimize the impact on steep slopes and
reduce the height of required retaining walls. The proposed
setback variances must be considered by the Zoning Board of Appeals
is a separate action. The site plans and unit plans were submitted
to show the developers intentions are not requirements of the
requested zoning.
The-subject property is designated as suitable for low density
attached residential by the City Comprehensive Plan. Double
bungalow development is consistent with this designation. During
the past several years three different development proposals have
been approved for the westerly 3.2 acres of this tract. In 1986,
a .rezoning to PRD -3 was approved for a 15 unit townhouse
development. In 1987 a five lot, -10 unit double bungalow
development was approved in the summer of 1990. All of these
development were consistent with the six unit per acre density
allowed by.the low density attached residential classification of
the property.
The current proposal includes the above referenced property
and an additional parcel at the easterly cul de sac measuring about
3/4 of a acre. The resulting overall density is four units per
acre, which is approximately equal to the 12 unit proposal approved
in 1990.
The proponents have .submitted floor plans and prospective
elevations for the development. The plans are similar to
developments now underway in Bloomington and Eden Prairie by the
developers.
Previous proposals on this property were complicated by
pending tax forfeiture actions. The property has since gone tax
forfeit and. was purchased by the developer at the state tax forfeit
auction.
Recommendation:
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the proposed' lots comply with the
requirements of the: R -2 zoning district. The density of the
development is consistent with past approvals given development
proposals for this property.
As mentioned earlier building placement and any resulting
variances are not ,a part of the rezoning or subdivision actions.
They are shown 'here only to'illustrate the developers intent.
Staff intends to support the proposed setback variances based on
the physical hardships caused by the steep slopes.
Staff recommends preliminary rezoning approval and preliminary
plat approval subject to:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Final Plat Approval
InI• r «Tel v, w .1....
m
a •� i• cl I
.. . ,A .. .. .. .. I .. .. I .. .. , .. .. -,
BL if
:I
• :� \ ... I I �Iwo i•.o :Lp,0 : =.loo , 1 ro,sw f
C=URF_
AM ,w w.wn ,. ooce
.01 MIA M1h1[p
-. Lor low
wrr >.. L•l
LR Li� 2 IM,LA
I�AiI Let
0 iYNA
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
`v,ii:i,cw eJL1YJ
el F 'eT «u.n.Irl1."e LJI y
nylee 1Y.M
.IY u •11 . M•I I.�w �ul�.0 r
W., ee. •1' Ile 1 . lle•)1•J1�u.e•.
DESCRIPTION
TOIAL •ALA
100 K
iIIILLi AYlIIT-0i -IST
RATR, lots
11•,,00 W.
..J•1 I .(, ::�:+ / :.C+1'
SCALE C -40F
AVEAAGE LOT AREA
21,100 SF.
.. . ,A .. .. .. .. I .. .. I .. .. , .. .. -,
BL if
:I
• :� \ ... I I �Iwo i•.o :Lp,0 : =.loo , 1 ro,sw f
C=URF_
AM ,w w.wn ,. ooce
.01 MIA M1h1[p
-. Lor low
wrr >.. L•l
LR Li� 2 IM,LA
I�AiI Let
0 iYNA
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
`v,ii:i,cw eJL1YJ
el F 'eT «u.n.Irl1."e LJI y
nylee 1Y.M
.IY u •11 . M•I I.�w �ul�.0 r
W., ee. •1' Ile 1 . lle•)1•J1�u.e•.
DESCRIPTION
TOIAL •ALA
100 K
iIIILLi AYlIIT-0i -IST
RATR, lots
11•,,00 W.
TOTAL w loll
s
AVEAAGE LOT AREA
21,100 SF.
FJOSS s0L OO6Nr
4.0 ORITSIAC
Ail wrl DENSITY
• 0 1MTSIAC
REVISIUNS CERTIFICATION , 1 S C H O E L L S M A D S O N, I N C. OWNER I DEVELOPER • - PROJECT NAPE I BNEET TITLE
NAI tlr NL rI,I[IN_� IV. ` rry. •err
— -- Ci° -- d, -•- ENGINEERS , SURVEYORS A PLANNERS VERNON HILL
SOIL TESTING , ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC.
_ X..Y.rL o.•.o� toe lo e.ri•T• eouLruD � PRELIMINARY PLAT
Ar �vI H Ayr /!wP AINETpoll) Oi 07601• S5J07 DATA JUL T,IN7
A�
21rcc' I
TES r, 1' N4 1 �1:• D ` ' I
r
IT
i
EM
I THCAL SERVICES
x -®
SCALE
I _1�
I o
� tl
I •
I _ -
Ln-
�}
CAfI.KI a..na W■
[aUTW t' W WII.aT
A[A2a uAVI{t rt.nc.Ll
LEGEND
.v�...l_ rOY10 tTYY 4.UI
�� nxrouY water eau
-- unnu aAU.ruO
au[IluO Ur.Iir IK.t0.w{ AY .Rwr.YYt[ Ma
.111 11 Ial tl vlalll,t MII.I lYa ■Al MAat AND
lu ■.Ixxl 1pw
NEV15111N5 CEIIIIEIt;AIIUN 1 SCHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. UVINER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME I SKEET TITLE
xT I = �: �• r — ENGINEERS ■ SURVEYORS . PLAraiER3 VERI HILL
SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONNENIAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC.
Mao .•rl.l• 11=11 m PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
ILIA 0". IuYI 0.11 JUI LI•YV:
BUILDING
I 1 WATER
MIIOtmCIOOP6{Kt[D
KME
Ir M -
CMO STOP 00W
K
D
u al
[ ■1 Tw DI. ►`I
.Arz11YUN�
I THCAL SERVICES
x -®
SCALE
I _1�
I o
� tl
I •
I _ -
Ln-
�}
CAfI.KI a..na W■
[aUTW t' W WII.aT
A[A2a uAVI{t rt.nc.Ll
LEGEND
.v�...l_ rOY10 tTYY 4.UI
�� nxrouY water eau
-- unnu aAU.ruO
au[IluO Ur.Iir IK.t0.w{ AY .Rwr.YYt[ Ma
.111 11 Ial tl vlalll,t MII.I lYa ■Al MAat AND
lu ■.Ixxl 1pw
NEV15111N5 CEIIIIEIt;AIIUN 1 SCHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. UVINER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME I SKEET TITLE
xT I = �: �• r — ENGINEERS ■ SURVEYORS . PLAraiER3 VERI HILL
SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONNENIAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC.
Mao .•rl.l• 11=11 m PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
ILIA 0". IuYI 0.11 JUI LI•YV:
s
r
•4: fre I
`F:'O] I
1
• ;n, � 1111 II f9a� rr LOlf
I t raL� s I
'SCALE - f •.Gf
a..r .Mi nw ro I I
�. 1••Q wMOt - -Ira. - IL cL, rrww - _ _
.3. n
I 1MO T /tw9 ,. •
ITrpN711 f01f/ If /MOflr Tl foalr I � � r I II lI!! /I !I!! Ii,
y nfan I pwoo 1 = . rr wolr nwn \ „ n ,�
•leM�
IF w10 rr fuA 1 r /wt0 IINrO , W /
�roio
1
�
N9•r.
no
- ttMCT rot - '•• .
- Ywal•n M r rIY .u.[ .-1-.- W � � I' .•, JJ Y11
.J
-.020 — rfwOwO twtwwf
, ,JI1 q} II �..�. �• tIl
rte! IfOWI A POT C.I.MM
ucorrtxo[o Ib -Ix Iftxcn
nllw[3nYwO llrwwl uwr.w wmM
• AIAxT L w PA<LY rr Wl.tl. Iuw • • L J = ^� :�'�: ��,,, w14wq HLl
EROS.O CO.AOL UEIAIL r.•^ _•CAI01 MASw OETAIL
REVISION'S
CERTIFICATION 1 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
Cy. tlI Rk VI51(Ix .. rl. rw +� -,r u�. �.r.. ENGINEERS f SURVEYORS L PLOVERS
Jl�w .w. SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
105 D - - - -- �I.V NNEIO .I. IA BDULEVARD
Nr r Hey r� MI 10NLA. Nlrn$5M11 55303
16121 516 -7601
OWNER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME 7 SHEET TITLE
DAVID CARLSON CO. INC. VERNON HILL
(PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
DATE:JULT.199r
OAK POINTE TOWNHOMES
A Reggie Award Winning Design
1,657 square feet by David Carlson Companies, Inc.
A Reggie Award Builder
Fxbawt B
11m,
V,
A.IM
■
FIREPLACE OPT-oNAL
11
rl FAMILY ROOM
r:.. 22' x 20'
II
II -
I
II
UP
Elm
STORAGE
FuR. 11 II . —. BEDROOM
I �� ,
151x13
tt
WLI
II
I
II
❑
PATIO,
12'x 10'
(Walk -out
lots only)
LOWER LEVEL 800 SQ. FT (WHEN FINISHED) AD Dmmman AWOxwn"
OAK POINTE TOWNHONES
City Location with Country Hair—
Location, location, location —
the three secrets of home ownership.
And, Oak.Pointe makes location
more meaningful than ever before.
Oak Pointe embraces the best
of Bloomington, adds a Reggie
Award- winning townhome design, .
captures the lakes and advantages of
a nationally recognized recreational
program.
Want specifics? Oak Pointe is
located next to some of the areas
finest park land: Hyland Park
Reserve, Bush Lake and other
nearby lakes. The area offers miles
of biking, hiking, cross - country ski
trails and a downhill ski location.
Golfers are near Hyland Greens
and Dwan city -owned courses.
Oak Pointe planning captures the
areas vistas, preserves the natural
beauty of the site.
"Then check oll' the convenience
to shopping centers, schools, simple
freeway access (but not too close),
Bloomington Community Center.
Discover the good life without the
big commute.
You must see Oak Pointe
Townhomes. See how much
more Oak Pointe gives you for
your housing dollar, see design
that'ntakcs every day a living joy.
Oak Pointe Townhomes include these features:
• Washer
• Dryer
• Refrigerator
• Range
■ Dishwasher
• Disposal
• Rangehood
• Central Air
• Carpoing
• $S(N) Light Fixture Allowance
• Cultured Marble Vanity "lops
• Ceramic Tile Kitchen Floor
• Ceramic Tile Baths
• Vinyl Flooring in Laundry
• Deck (Size of Porch)
• Black Top Driveway
• Underground Sprinkler System
• Landscaped Common Areas
• Wood Handrailings
• Lower level Bath Rough -In
• 2 Car Attached Garage
• Garage Door Opener
• Maintenance Free Vinyl Siding
• Vinyl Clad Windows
IN Rain Gullcrs On Garagc
Along Sidewalk
■ Solid Core Birch Doors
(except closet by -pass)
Your Oak Pointe Townhome includes the security
of a 10 -Year (HOW) insured warranty.
X
'
HWY 494 g
O
cc
h1oHH,600 fn 84TH ST.
�R�VF
w
51
Go
a W.g4m
O
O • COQ
X
�" POINTE r
W
s N
J
o
X
m M
z
¢
O
z
CO. RD.1 OLD SHAKOPEE RD.
HWY 18
m
Oak Pointe Monthly Association Fee:
$135 guaranteed thru 1/1/94, pays for these owner services:
Insurance on the Building
Common Area Electricity
Common Area Water and Sewer
Exterior Maintenance of the Building
Road Maintenance
Recreational Building r
t�
Member of Minneapolis Builders
Association and the National
Association of Home Builders.
Member Better Business Bureau
a Q
EQUaI Mouvng Opponunny
Reserves for Future Repairs
Trash Removal
Lawn Mowing
Snow Shoveling.
Ground Maintenance
Outdoor Swimming Pool .
OAK POINTE
TOWNHO14ES
. PHONE 949 -961.6
DAVID CARLSON COMPANIES,_ INC.
A ffi%gie Atrurel Miller
A.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
H O.
v
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT-: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: 21 September, 1992
AGENDA ITEM - Iv. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50th & France Pedestrian Lights
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
Carnes (Proprietary Item) $ 23,486.70
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5,
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Carnes $ 23,486.70
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the final purchase of public lighting fixtures for 50th &
France Commercial Area for the Streetscape project. These costs are
figured into the assessment process.being held next month. Private
developers are buying some additional fixtures to use on their
buildings. These fixtures will be used under the new walkway canopy
next to Bellesons, and to light along the east side of the alley
along the middle ramp.
ignat e>
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Engineering
. Department
Finance Director
Manager
A.
oe`(n
Hr� �°
• f ~�bRroMt�v
leas
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR PRO -TEM AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item ##
V.A
..
From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Consent
Information Only
❑
Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992
i
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: AMENDMENT OF COUNCIL
❑
To Council
iMINUTES OF JULY 6, 1992
i
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution i
❑!
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve amendment of Council Minutes of July 6, 1992, to include the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR NORMANDALE GOLF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain plat entitled " NORMANDALE GOLF ", platted by Normandale Golf, Inc.
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 6, 1992, be and
is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Info /Background
See attached memorandum from Attorney Gilligan.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
FROM: Jerry Gilligan
DATE: September 18, 1992
RE: Amendment of Minutes of July 6, 1992 City Council Meeting
At its meeting on July 6, 1992, the City Council held a public hearing on
the Normandale Golf Area. The hearing was noticed as being on an amendment to
Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval related to the
proposed redevelopment (and this was reflected in the agenda for the meeting). At
the conclusion of the hearing the City Council approved the proposed acquisition of
Normandale Golf Course and the development of an office building on the 6.2 acres
fronting on West 77th Street subject to certain setback lines and building size and
height limits. The minutes of the July 6th meeting include the adoption of a
resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to designate the 6.2 acres fronting on
West 77th Street as a potential office development site and first reading to an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to transfer the 6.2 acres to Planned Office
District, Subdistrict POD -1. The minutes inadvertently did not include a resolution
giving preliminary plat approval.
It is recommended that the minutes of the July 6th City Council
meeting be amended to include a resolution approving the preliminary plat for
Normandale Golf Course.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
:\ 1'. \H'1'. \'EHtl111Y 1�l'LL'UI �'U I'NUIlX41U�'wL L�OH1Yl H. \TIU \'H
o e tri
Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR PRO -TEM AND COUNCIL
From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 I M
Subject: NORMANDALE GOLF COURSE
PURCHASE AGREEMENT,
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND
FINDINGS OF FACT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # vv_B
Consent [K]
Information Only
;r. Recommends ❑
1E
Action
IL
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Approve and adopt the attached resolution authorizing execution of purchase
agreement and development contract, and making findings of fact.
Info /Background:
When the Council approved the purchase of the Normandale Golf Course property
at the meeting of July 6, 1992, the Council requested that the contract and
purchase agreement documents be brought back to the Council for approval.
Mayor Richards has followed the negotiations on the contract and purchase
agreement and has agreed to the terms therein. The terms are the same as
were presented to the Council on July 6, 1992, and which the Council approved
at that time.
ik, 4
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND
RELATED AGREEMENTS FOR NORMANDALE GOLF
COURSE PROPERTY, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
AND DECLARING INTENTION TO REIMBURSE
EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(herein called the "City "), as follows:
1. RECITALS. Normandale Golf, Inc. (herein called the "Owner ") is
the owner of property lying north of West 77th Street and east of Highway 100 in the
corporate limits of the City, described as Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050,
Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (herein called "Tract
R "). Tract R is now and has been used as and for a commercial private nine -hole
golf course known as Normandale Golf Course, which has been operated by the
Owner. It has been proposed that the City purchase Tract R from the Owner on the
terms and conditions contained in a Purchase Agreement between the Owner and
the City (herein called the "Purchase Agreement "), a copy of which has been
presented to this Council. The Purchase Agreement provides that the City and the
Owner will enter into an Option and Development Contract (herein called the
"Development Contract "), a copy of which has been presented to this Council,
pursuant to which the City grants to the Owner the option to repurchase from the
City a portion of Tract R constituting approximately 6.2 acres and fronting on West
77th Street (herein called the "Development Property"). The City proposes to
reconstruct Normandale Golf Course for use as a public nine -hole golf course. For
access to the east end of the reconstructed golf course the City proposes to acquire a
driveway easement (herein called the "Driveway Easement ") from Pentagon Park
Limited Partnership (herein called "Pentagon Park ") on the terms and conditions
contained in a Purchase Agreement (for Easement Agreement), between the City
and Pentagon Park (herein called the "Easement Agreement "), a copy of which has
been presented to this Council. The Development Contract provides that if the
Owner exercises its option to purchase the Development Property, the Owner
acquires such property subject to certain restrictions and limitations set forth in the
Development Contract which are imposed for the benefit of the City. By resolution
adopted July 6, 1992, this Council has amended the Comprehensive Plan 1980 to
show the Development Property as a potential office development site and to show
the balance of Tract R as "public" area, and on July 6, 1992 gave first reading to an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City to transfer the Development
Property to the Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1 and preliminary approval
to a subdivision of the Development Property from the balance of Tract R.
2. AUTHORIZATIONS AND APPROVALS. The City hereby
authorizes the purchase by the City of Tract R upon the terms and conditions set
forth in the Purchase Agreement, and the granting by the City to the Owner of the
option to repurchase the Development Property upon the terms and conditions set
forth in the Development Contract and the acquisition by the City of the Driveway
Easement upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Easement Agreement. The
forms of the Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Easement Agreement
are approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved
by the Mayor and City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by
execution of the Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Easement
Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are
directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the
transactions herein contemplated.
3. FINDINGS. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
A. The City acknowledges that during the period the Development
Contract is in effect it will not place any further restrictions, encumbrances or other
impediments to the development of the Development Property other than as may
be contained in the Ordinances of the City, including, but limited to, the City's
Zoning Ordinance, as in effect from time to ,time, and no amendment by the City to
the comphrensive plan or official control shall apply to affect the use, development
density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the
approval application- unless approved in writing by the Owner.
B. The City acknowledges that Section 8.3 of the Development Contract
provides that upon exercise by the Owner of its option to purchase the Development
Property under. the Development Contract, the Owner and City intend to apply for
rezoning of the Development Property to Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1,
so that Owner can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings
(a) with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross
floor area is defined in the City's Zoning Ordinance) for all buildings on the
Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet,
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top
mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to the
setback lines shown on Exhibit C to the Development Contract.
C. The City believes that the development of the Development
Property in the manner and subject to the restrictions set forth in B above is
reasonable and appropriate.
D. The Development Property fronts on West 77th Street, which is a
heavily traveled commercial street and has office developments to its east, west and
south and will be separated from single family dwellings located north of Tract R by
Normanda)e Golf Course.
-2-
E. It is consistent with past planning and zoning practice of the City to
permit the Development Property to be developed in the manner and subject to the
restrictions set forth in B above particularly in light of and recognizing that adjacent
parcels have office developments located thereon.
F. To the extent the development of the Development Property is
subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 8.3 of the Development Contract, the
City will assert no claim of right and waives all claims in respect of the development
of the Development Property except as set forth in this Resolution, and will assert
no benefit of any restriction on its use other than as provided in the Development
Contract, Minnesota or federal laws and in the Ordinances of the City, including, but
not limited to, the City's Zoning Ordinance, as in effect from time to time.
G. The City has given first reading to an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance of the City to transfer the Development Property to the Planned Office
District, Subdistrict POD -1, has amended the Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the
Development Property as a potential office development site and to show the
balance of Tract R as "public" area, and has given preliminary approval to a
subdivision of the Development Property from the balance of Tract R.
H. The City acknowledges that the setback, size, height and berming
requirements contained in the Development Contract are specific restrictions to
which the Development Property is subject if it is purchased upon the exercise of the
option granted by the Development Contract, and further acknowledges that such
restrictions are subject to termination upon the conditions set forth in Section 9.1 of
the Development Contract.
4. REIMBURSEMENT. The City reasonably expects to reimburse up to
$800,000 of the expenditures to be made by the City for the purchase of Tract R out of
the proceeds of the general obligation bonds to be issued by the City pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (herein
called the "Bonds "). All reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures as
defined in Section 1.150 -1(h) of the United States Treasury Regulations (herein
called the "Regulations "). This declaration is a declaration of official intent adopted
pursuant to Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations. As of the date hereof, there are no
City funds reserved, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set aside (or
reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set
aside) to provide permanent financing for expenditures related to the purchase of
Tract R, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Bonds.
Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and
records of.the City maintained for the Bonds, shall specifically identify the actual
prior expenditure being reimbursed or, in the case of reimbursement of a fund or
account in accordance with Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, the fund or account
-3-
account in accordance with Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, the fund or account
from which the expenditure was paid, and shall be effective to relieve the proceeds
of the Bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution or other relevant legal
documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable state statute, which would apply
to unspent proceeds of the Bonds.
This resolution, therefore, is determined to be consistent with the
City's budgetary and financial circumstances as they exist or are reasonably
forseeable on the date hereof, all within the meaning and content of Section 1.103 -18
of the Regulations. The City Finance Director shall be responsible for making the
"reimbursement allocations" described in Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, being
generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the Bonds to
reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of
the purchase price of Tract R.
-4-
9/18/92
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of September, 1992, by
and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Seller ") and
the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Buyer ").
In consideration of this Agreement, Seller and Buyer agree as follows:
1. Sale of Property. Subject to the terms, conditions and provisions
herein, Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy from Seller, the
following property (collectively, "Property"):
1.1 Real Property. The real property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, described on the attached Exhibit A ( "Land ")
together with all improvements ( "Improvements ") constructed or
located on the Land (collectively the "Real Property ").
1.2 Personal Property. All of the personal property owned by Seller and
situated in, on, or about the Real Property on the Closing Date and used
by Seller to operate or maintain the golf course on the Land ( "Personal
Property ").
2. Purchase Price and Manner of Payment. The total purchase price
( "Purchase Price ") to be paid for the Property shall be Eight Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($800,000.00). The Purchase Price shall be payable as follows:
2.1 $1,000.00 as earnest money ( "Earnest Money ") which Earnest Monev
shall be held by Seller in accordance with this Agreement.
2.2 The balance by wire transfer of good funds on the Closing Date.
3. Contingencies.
3.1 The obligations of Seller under this Agreement are contingent upon
the representations and warranties of Buyer contained in this
Agreement, if true to Buyer's knowledge and belief, being true on the
date of this Agreement and Buyer must again confirm them in writing;
on the Closing Date as being true and correct on the Closing Date.
3.2 The obligations of Buyer under this Agreement are contingent upon
each of the following:
3.2.1 . Representations and Warranties. The representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement, if true to
Seller's knowledge and belief, being true on the date of this
Agreement and Seller must again confirm them in writing on
the Closing Date as being true and correct on the Closing Date.
3.2.2 Title. Title shall have been found acceptable, or been made
acceptable, in accordance with the requirements and terms of
Section 6 below.
3.2.3 Access and Inspection. Seller shall have allowed Buyer, and
Buyer's agents, access to the Real Property without charge and at
all reasonable times for the purpose of Buyer's investigation and
testing the same. Seller shall make available to Buyer and
Buyer's agents without charge copies of all plans and
specifications, records, maps, soil tests, engineering studies,
inventories, environmental reports, permits and
correspondence in Seller's possession relating to Hazardous
Substances affecting the Property; and the right to interview
employees of Seller who may have knowledge of such matters.
Buyer shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and
testing, shall restore the Real Property to as nearly as possible the
condition it was in immediately prior to such investigation and
testing, and shall hold Seller and the Real Property harmless
from all costs and liabilities relating to the Buyer's activities
except such liabilities arising solely out of information produced
or obtained as a result of Buyer's activities. Buyer shall have
been satisfied with the results of all tests and investigations
performed by it or on its behalf.
3.2.4 Government ARRrovals. Buyer shall have obtained at its sole
cost and expense on or before the Closing Date all final
governmental approvals necessary in Buyer's sole judgment, in
order to construct on the Land, and use the Property for, the golf
course desired by Buyer and to use the well located on the Land.
Seller shall cooperate in all reasonable respects with Buyer in
obtaining such approvals, and shall execute such applications,
permits and other documents as may be requested by Buyer in
connection therewith which do not create encumbrances on, or
adversely affect the title to, the Property, all without cost to
Seller.
3.2.5 Street Easement. Buyer shall have obtained, on terms and
conditions acceptable to Buyer, an easement for public street and
7
utility purposes from Parklawn Avenue east of the Land to the
clubhouse to be constructed on the eastern end of the Land.
If any contingency in 3.1 hereof or 3.2 hereof has not been satisfied on or before the
Closing Date, then this Agreement may be terminated by notice from Seller to Buyer
as to contingencies in 3.1, and from Buyer to Seller as to contingencies in 3.2, which
notice shall be given on or before the Closing Date. Upon termination, the Earnest
Money shall be released to Buyer and upon return, neither party will have any
further rights or obligations regarding this Agreement or the Property. All the
contingencies in 3.1 are specifically for the benefit of the Seller, and the Seller shall
have the right to waive any contingency by written notice to Buyer. All the
contingencies in 3.2 are specifically for the benefit of the Buyer, and the Buyer shall
have the right to waive any contingency by written notice to Seller.
Seller understands and agrees that Buyer shall have no obligation or
duty to take any action or make any decision so as to satisfy any or all of the
contingencies at 3.1 or 3.2, but Buyer has and retains all of its municipal authority
relating to such contingencies. If Buyer should fail or refuse, for any reason, to act or
decide in a way that would satisfy all of such contingencies, such failure or refusal
shall not be deemed a default under this Agreement, but Seller's sole and exclusive
remedy and relief shall be termination of this Agreement for non - satisfaction of
such contingency, or waiver of such contingency, as provided in this Section 3.
4. Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by this
Agreement (the "Closing ") shall occur on the date of this Agreement (the "Closing
Date "). The Closing shall take place at 1:30 p.m. local time at Dorsey & Whitney, 220
South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Seller agrees to deliver possession of
the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date.
4.1 Seller's Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Seller shall execute
and deliver to Buyer the following (collectively, "Seller's Closing
Documents "), all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Buyer
4.1.1 Deed. A Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Real Property to
Buyer, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted
Encumbrances hereafter defined.
4.1.2 Bill of Sale. A Warranty Bill of Sale conveying the Personal
Property to Buyer, free and clear of all encumbrances except
Permitted Encumbrances.
4.1.3 Original Documents. Except for plans, specifications, reports,
studies, maps and similar documents relating to improvementN
planned for, but never constructed on, the Property, originals or
3
copies of all permits, maps, surveys, environmental reports and
studies, plans and specifications, soil tests, engineering studies,
and similar documents for the Property in Seller's possession.
4.1.4 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed,
containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue
Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations.
4.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate
certificate of title regarding the Real Property.
4.1.6 Well Certificate and Permits. A Well Certificate in the form
required by Minn. Stat. § 103I, an assignment and transfer to
Buyer of all permits related to any wells on the Real Property
and the originals of all such permits, if available.
4.1.7 Storage Tanks. If the Property contains or contained a storage
tank or tanks, an affidavit with respect thereto, as required by
Minn. Stat. § 116.48 and Seller shall give all notifications and
register such tank or tanks as required by statute.
4.1.8 Option and Development Contract. The Option and
Development Contract (the "Option and Development
Contract ") in substantially the form and content of Exhibit B
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
4.1.9 Representations and Warranties. Written confirmation that the
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are true and
correct as of the Closing Date. Seller shall have no liability for
failure to reconfirm warranties, if Seller, in good faith, believes
such warranties not to be true on the Closing Date; provided,
however, nothing shall release Seller from liability for
representations and warranties made herein prior to the Closing
Date. If Seller fails to reconfirm all such warranties, Buyer, at its
option, may terminate this Agreement in the same manner, and
with the same effect and result, as termination for failure to
satisfy a contingency in Section 3 hereof. The five day period in
which this Agreement can be terminated shall begin on the date
of such failure of Seller to reconfirm.
4.1.10 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of
Real Estate Value in customary form.
4
4.1.11 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by
Seller, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and
federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in
the Property.
4.1.12 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other
documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the
Property to Buyer free and clear of all encumbrances other than
Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to the provisions hereof.
4.2 Buyer's Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Buyer will execute
and deliver to Seller the following (collectively, "Buyer's Closing
Documents "):
4.2.1 Purchase Price. Funds representing the Purchase Price, by wire
transfer of good funds.
4.2.2 Representations and Warranties. Written confirmation that the
warranties of Buyer contained in this Agreement are true and
correct as of the Closing Date. Buyer shall have no liability for
failure to reconfirm warranties, if Buyer, in good faith, believes
such warranties not to be true on the Closing Date; provided,
however, nothing shall release Buyer from liability for
representations and warranties made herein prior to the Closing
Date. If Buyer fails to reconfirm all such warranties, Seller, at its
option, may terminate this Agreement in the same manner, and
with the same effect and result, as termination for failure to
satisfy a contingency in Section 3 hereof. The five day period in
which this Agreement can be terminated shall begin on the date
of such failure of Buyer to reconfirm.
4.2.3 Option and Development Contract. The Option and
Development Contract in substantially the form and content of
Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof.
5. Prorations. Seller and Buyer agree to the following pro- rations and
allocation of costs regarding this Agreement:
5.1 Title Insurance and Closing Fee. Seller will pay all costs of the Title
Evidence, the Title Policy and the fees charged by Title for any escrow
required regarding Buyer's Objections. Seller and Buyer will each pay
one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by the title company.
5
5.2 Deed Tax. Seller shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection
with this transaction.
5.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments.
5.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes, against the Real Property
payable. in 1991 and all prior years shall be paid in full by Seller
on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the Real Property
payable in 1992 shall be prorated as of the Closing Date.
5.3.2 Special Assessments. All special assessments levied or pending
against all or any part of the -Real Property as of the Closing shall
be paid in full by Buyer on or before the Closing. If the amount
of the pending assessments are not known at Closing, such
amount shall be determined by Buyer, in its sole discretion, and
such amount shall be paid by Seller to Buyer at Closing, and
Buyer shall be responsible for paying such assessments when
due.
5.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary
notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the Real
Property is now valued and assessed under Minnesota Statutes,
§ 273.112, that Buyer assumes full risk of the imposition against
the Real Property of additional taxes pursuant to said § 273.112 or
otherwise, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the
Real Property, Seller shall have no obligation to pay the same.
5.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated
between Seller and Buyer as of the Closing Date, so that Seller pays that
part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and Buyer pans
that part of operating costs accruing from and after the Closing Date.
5.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees,
except that a party defaulting under this Agreement or any Closing
Document will pay the reasonable attorney's fees and court costs
incurred by the nondefaulting party to enforce its rights hereunder.
6. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows.-
6.1 Seller's Title Evidence. Seller shall, prior to closing, furnish the
following (collectively, "Title Evidence ") to Buyer:
6.1.1 A commitment ( "Title Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B
1970 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Real
Z
Property, deleting standard exceptions and including affirmative
insurance regarding contiguity, appurtenant easements and such
other matters as may be identified by Buyer, in the amount of
the Purchase Price, issued by Title Insurance Company of
Minnesota ( "Title ").
6.1.2 A survey prepared by a registered land surveyor licensed to
practice in Minnesota showing the Real Property, the boundaries
thereof, the location of all buildings and easements thereon, and
such other information and containing such matters as set forth
in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof.
6.2 Buyer's Objections. Prior to Closing, Buyer will make written
objections ( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title
Evidence. Buyer's failure to make Objections within such time period
will constitute waiver of Objections but only for purposes of this
Agreement; it shall not be a waiver of any rights or objections Buyer
may have as a municipality to approve or disapprove of plats or
subdivisions pursuant to its ordinances or applicable state statutes. The
encumbrances listed on Exhibit A hereto and any matter shown on
such Title Evidence and not objected to by Buyer shall be a "Permitted
Encumbrance" hereunder. Seller will have until the Closing Date to
cure the Objections, during which period the Closing will be
postponed, if necessary. Seller shall use all reasonable efforts (without
expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000.00 as contemplated by
paragraph 6.2.2) to correct any Objections. If the Objections are not
cured prior to Closing, Buyer will have the option to do any of the
following:
6.2.1 Terminate this Agreement and receive a refund of the Earnest
Money without interest.
6.2.2 Withhold from the Purchase Price an amount, not to exceed
$10,000.00, which, in the reasonable judgment of Title, is
sufficient to assure cure of the Objections. Any amount so
withheld will be placed in escrow with Title, pending such cure.
If Seller does not cure such Objections within ninety (90) days
after such escrow is established, Buyer may then cure such
Objections and charge the costs against, and only against, the
escrowed amount. The parties agree to execute and deliver such
documents as may be reasonably required by Title to create such
escrow, and Seller agrees to pay the charges of Title to create and
administer the escrow.
VA
6.2.3 Waive the objections and proceed to close.
6.3 Title Policy. Seller will furnish to Buyer at Closing a title policy ( "Title
Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a suitably
marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking to issue a
Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment as approved
by Buyer and Seller will obtain an optionee's policy of title insurance or
a suitable marked -up title commitment initialed by Title undertaking
to issue an optionee's policy of title insurance in respect to the
Development Property.
7. Operation. Seller shall execute no contracts, leases or other
agreements regarding the Property that are not terminable on or before the Closing
Date, without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent may be withheld by
Buyer at its sole discretion. Buyer shall remove the building and other
improvements now located on that portion of the Land described on the attached
Exhibit F (the "Development Property") as soon as reasonably possible after the
Closing Date. Buyer shall not develop or permit the development of any wetlands
on the Development Property. Buyer shall (from the date hereof until termination
of the Option and Development Contract or closing of the transaction contemplated
by the Option and Development Contract) use the Development Property for a
"qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota
Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. Buyer agrees (a) to build the berm,
and plant shrubs, trees and other plants thereon, as shown on the plan (the "Berm
Plan" attached hereto as Exhibit G within two years after the Closing Date, and (b) to
replace in accordance with the Berm Plan any shrubs, trees and other plants thereon
that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to such an extent that based upon
a standard of reasonableness both as to function and appearance any such shrub, tree
or other plant should be replaced.
8. Representations and Warranties.
8.1 Seller represents and warrants to Buyer as follows:
8.1.1 Existence; Authority. Seller is duly organized, qualified and in
good standing, and has the requisite power and authority to
enter into and perform this Agreement and Seller's Closing
Documents; such documents have been duly authorized by all
necessary action; such documents are valid and binding
obligations of Seller, and are enforceable in accordance with their
terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, debt arrangement, moratorium, insolvency or other
E.
laws of general application, and equitable principles affecting the
enforcement of creditors' rights. in general.
8.1.2 Leases and Contracts. Except for Permitted Encumbrances, there
are no leases or contracts regarding the Property which will bind
the Property or any owner of the Property beyond the Closing
Date, and except for Permitted Encumbrances, no persons other
than Buyer shall have any possessory rights of all or any part of
the Property after the Closing Date.
8.1.3 Operations. Seller has received no notice of actual or threatened
cancellation or suspension of any utility services or certificate of
occupancy for any portion of the Real Property.
8.1.4 Agents and Employees. No management agents or other
personnel employed in connection with the operation of the
Property have the right to continue such employment after the
Closing Date. There are no claims for brokerage commission or
other payments with respect to the existing Property, including
leases, which will survive and remain unpaid after the Closing
Date.
8.1.5 Environmental Laws. To the best knowledge of Seller, except for
pesticides and fertilizer used in the ordinary maintenance and
operation of the Golf Course located on the Land, (i) no toxic or
hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants
(including, without limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the
group of organic compounds known as polychlorinated
biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude
oil and various constituents of such products, and any
hazardous substance as defined in any state, local or federal law,
regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the
environment) (collectively, "Hazardous Substance ") have been
generated, treated, stored, transferred from, released or disposed
of, or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Property;
(ii) no activity has been undertaken on the Property that would
cause or contribute to the Property becoming a treatment, storage
or disposal facility within the meaning of, or otherwise bring t};L-
Property within the ambit of, any state, local or federal law,
regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the
environment; (iii) no discharge, release or threatened release of
Hazardous Substances has occurred from the Property; (iv) them
are no Hazardous Substances or conditions in or on the Property
that may support a claim or cause of action under any state, local
or federal law, regulation, rule; policy or order relating to the
protection of the environment; and (v) the Property never has
been used as landfill, dump, disposal or storage site for
Hazardous Substances.
8.1.6 Seller's Defaults. Seller is not in default concerning any of its
obligations or liabilities regarding the Property which creates, or
will create, alien or charge against any portion of the Property or
against Buyer as an owner of the Property.
8.1.7 FIRPTA. Seller is not a "foreign person ", "foreign partnership ",
"foreign trust" or "foreign estate ", as those terms are defined in
Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code.
8.1.8 Proceedings. There is no action, litigation, investigation,
condemnation or proceeding of any kind pending or threatened
against Seller which is related to or involves any portion of the
Property.
8.1.9 Wells. Seller represents that there is one "Well" within the
meaning of Minn. Stat. § 103I on the Property, that Seller has
received all necessary permits for the operation, maintenance
and use thereof, and in connection therewith Seller delivers to
Buyer, and Buyer acknowledges receipt of, the Minnesota Well
Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit D.
8.1.10 Storage Tanks. To the best knowledge of Seller, no above
ground or underground tanks are located in or about the
Property, or have been located under, in or about the Property
and have subsequently been removed or filled, except for the
above ground tank, if any, described on Exhibit E attached hereto
and made a part hereof and that with respect to the above
ground tank, if any, described on the attached Exhibit E, all
notifications and registrations as required by Statute have been
given, made and completed.
8.1.11 Reports. Except for plans, specifications, reports, studies, maps
and similar documents relating to improvements planned for,
but never constructed on, the Property, Seller has delivered to
Buyer copies of all permits, maps, environmental reports and
studies, plans and specifications, soil tests, engineering studies
and similar documents relating to the Property which are in the
possession of Seller.
EIS
Seller will indemnify Buyer, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Buyer,
its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, that Buyer incurs because of the breach of any of the
above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or
after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Buyer is purchasing the Property
based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any
representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the
Property "as is, where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth
and the express warranties and representations herein contained.
8.2 Buyer represents and warrants to Seller as follows:
8.2.1 Existence; Authority. Buyer is duly organized municipal
corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite
power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement
and Buyer's Closing Documents; such documents have been
duly authorized by all necessary action; such documents are
valid and binding obligations of Buyer, and are enforceable in
accordance with their terms, except to the extent enforceability
may be limited by bankruptcy, debt arrangement, moratorium,
insolvency or other laws of general application, and equitable
principles affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in
general.
Buyer will indemnify Seller, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Seller,
its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, that Seller incurs because of the breach of any of the
above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or
after Closing.
9. Casualty; Condemnation. If all or any part of the Property is
substantially damaged by fire, casualty, the elements or any other cause, Seller shall
immediately give notice to Buyer, and Buyer shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement and receive back all Earnest Money, without interest, by giving notice
prior to Closing. If Buyer shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed
to Closing, and Seller shall assign to Buyer all rights to insurance proceeds resulting
from such event. If eminent domain proceedings are threatened or commenced
against all or any part of the Property, Seller shall immediately give notice to Buyer,
and Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and receive back all
Earnest Money, without interest, by giving notice prior to Closing. If Buyer shall
fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Seller shall
assign to Bttyer all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings.
11
10. Broker's Commission. Seller and Buyer represent to each other
that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection with
this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all
claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or commissions
resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the execution or
performance of this Agreement, and will pay all costs of defending any action or
lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other
party, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
11. Assignment. Except as provided in the Option and Development
Contract, neither party may assign its rights under this Agreement without the prior
written consent of the other party. Any such assignment will not relieve the
assigning party of its obligations under this Agreement.
12. Survival. All of the terms of this Agreement and warranties and
representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing.
13. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be
given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if
mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by
mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable
overnight courier, properly addressed as follows:
If to Seller: Normandale Golf, Inc.
c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 150
Minnetonka, MN 55440
Fax #: (612) 938 -3346
If to Buyer: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attn: City Manager
Fax #: (612) 927 -7645
Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of
mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is
given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the
other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing,
transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice b�
giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change.
12
14. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in
this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement, and are
not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. This written Agreement
constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior
oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the Property. There are no
verbal agreements that change this Agreement, and no waiver of any of its terms
will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. This Agreement binds
and benefits the parties and their successors and assigns. This Agreement has been
made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its
interpretation. Time is of the essence.
15. Remedies. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, Seller shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Buyer. If
Buyer fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this
Agreement will terminate, and upon such termination Seller will retain the Earnest
Money as liquidated damages, time being of the essence of this Agreement. The
termination of this Agreement and retention of the Earnest Money will be the sole
remedy available to Seller for such default by Buyer, and Buyer will not be liable for
damages or specific performance. If Seller defaults under this Agreement, this
provision does not preclude Buyer from seeking and recovering from Seller
damages for nonperformance or specific performance of this Agreement.
16. Withdrawal of Offer. This Agreement shall be deemed to be
withdrawn, unless accepted by Seller, and a fully executed counterpart of this
Agreement returned to Buyer on or before the closing of business on the fifth
business day after, but not including, the date of signature of Buyer below stated.
Seller and Buyer have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
Date of Signature
,19
13
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC.
By
Its
CITY OF EDINA
SELLER
Date of Signature
,19
14
By -
Its Mayor
And
Its Manager
BUYER
EXHIBIT A -
( "Land ")
Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of
Hennepin, Minnesota.
Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances):
1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records,
Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121.
EXHIBIT B
OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
THIS OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ( "Contract ") is
made as of the day of September, 1992 (the "Commencement Date "), by and
between the CITY OF EDNA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Edina "), and
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, ( "Normandale ").
BACKGROUND:
A. Edina has purchased from Normandale certain real property located in
the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof (the 'Property").
B. Edina has given preliminary approval to a subdivision of that part of
the Property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the
"Development Property ") from the balance of the Property and certain conditions
have been imposed in connection with such approval.
C. Edina and Normandale desire to enter into this Contract not only with
Edina as owner, but as provided in Section 810 of the Ordinance of Edina and in
Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 2a., 3c. and 4b.(6).
AGREEMENT:
In consideration of the foregoing premises and other valuable
consideration, Edina and Normandale agree as follows:
1. Purchase Option. Edina grants to Normandale an option ( "Purchase
Option ") to purchase the Development Property for One Dollar ($1.00).
Normandale shall exercise such Purchase Option, if at all, by giving a written notice
to Edina after the Commencement Date and before the sixteenth (16th) anniversary
of the Commencement Date ('Purchase Option Term "). In the event Normandale
fails to exercise the Purchase Option during the Purchase Option Term this Contract
shall, without further action or demand, terminate and be of no further force or
effect. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, Edina and
Normandale shall each execute and deliver to the other an agreement (the
"Termination Agreement ") in recordable and customary form evidencing the
termination of this Contract.
- 2. -- Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by the
Purchase Option (the "Closing ") will occur on the date (the "Closing Date" which is
the earlier of (a) the date 120 days after the date upon which Normandale exercises
the Purchase Option or (b) the date that is the later -of (i) the date five (5) business
days after Normandale has waived or been deemed to have waived all Objections
(as defined in paragraph 5.2 of this Contract) or such Objections have been cured by
Edina, or (ii) the date five (5) days after Edina completes a nonappealable division of
the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract, or (iii) the
date five days after the rezoning of the Development Property as required by
Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is obtained. The Closing will take place at 9:00 a.m.
local time at the office selected by Edina. Edina agrees to deliver possession of the
Development Property to Normandale on the Closing Date.
3. Closing Documents.
3.1 On the Closing Date, Edina shall execute and deliver to Normandale
the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to
Normandale:
3.1.1 Deed. Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Development
Property to Normandale, free and clear of all encumbrances,
except the Permitted Encumbrances hereafter defined and except
for the building size and height restrictions and set back
requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract which
shall be set forth in said Limited Warranty Deed and shall run
with the title to the Development Property and every part
thereof and interest therein and shall be binding upon all
persons, parties and entities having or acquiring any right, title,
interest or estate in the Development Property, or any part
thereof.
3.1.2 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed,
containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue
Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations.
3.1.3 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by
Edina, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and
federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in
the Development Property.
3.1.4 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of
Real Estate Value in customary form.
3.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate
certificate of title regarding the Development Property.
Fa
3.1.6 Termination. Termination of Memorandum of this Contract
which may have been recorded.
3.1.7 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other
documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the
Development Property to Normandale free and clear of all
encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to
the provisions hereof.
3.2 On the Closing Date, Normandale shall (a) execute, deliver and grant to
Edina a perpetual, non - exclusive easement for storm sewer purposes
in substantially the form and content of, and over, under and across
the portion of the Development Property described in, the easement
attached hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof and (b) execute and
deliver an agreement in recordable form evidencing and confirming
the agreement set forth in paragraph 8.9 hereof.
4. Prorations. Edina and Normandale agree to the following pro- rations and
allocation of costs regarding this Contract:
4.1 Title Insurance and Closing Fee. Normandale will pay all costs of the
Title Commitment, the title policy issued pursuant to the Title
Commitment and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by
Title.
4.2 Deed Tax. Edina shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection
with this transaction and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed
by Title.
4.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments.
4.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes against the Development
Property payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and
including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar
year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by
Edina on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the
Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the
Closing Date occurs shall be prorated as of the Closing Date.
Except as provided in paragraph 4.3.3 hereof, all real estate taxes
against the Development Property appropriately pro -rated on an
area basis if the Development Property is part of a larger tax
parcel payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in
which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by
Normandale except that Edina shall pay any real estate taxes
3
related to improvements not located on the Development
Property.
4.3.2 Svecial Assessments. All installments of special assessments
levied against all or any part of the Development Property
payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including
the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in
which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or
before Closing. All installments of special assessments levied
against all or any part of the Development Property payable in
the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be pro
rated as of the Closing Date. All installments of special
assessments levied or pending against all or any part of the
Development Property payable in the calendar years after the
calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in
full by Normandale. In the event any such special assessment is
levied and assessed against property which includes the
Development Property, such special assessment shall be
equitably divided and allocated so that the special assessments
levied against the Development Property are separate from the
special assessments against the balance of the property of which
the Development Property is a part. Edina agrees that no special
assessments shall be levied by Edina against the Development
Property due to the division of the Property pursuant to
Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the development by Edina of a
golf course on the Property.
4.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary
notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the
Development Property is now valued and assessed under
Minnesota Statutes, § 273.112. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option within five (5) years after the date of this
Contract, after the Closing Normandale assumes the full risk of
the imposition against the Development Property of additional
taxes pursuant to said § 273.112, and if such additional taxes are
imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall have no
obligation to pay the same. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option more than five (5) years after the date of this
Contract, Edina assumes the full risk of the imposition against
the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said
§273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the
Development Property, Edina shall pay the same.
4
4.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated
between Edina and Normandale as of the Closing Date, so that Edina
pays that part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and
Normandale pays that part of operating costs accruing from and after
the Closing Date.
4.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees,
except that a party defaulting under this Contract will pay the
reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the nondefaulting
party to enforce its rights hereunder. -
5. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows:
5.1 Edina's Title Evidence. Normandale shall, within twenty (20) days
after the exercise of the Purchase Option, obtain a commitment ( "Title
Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B 1970 Owner's Policy of Title
Insurance insuring title to the Real Property, deleting standard
exceptions and including affirmative insurance regarding contiguity,
appurtenant easements and such other matters as may be identified by
Normandale, in the amount of the Fair Market Value of the
Development Property (as defined in Paragraph 8.5 of this Contract),
issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota ( "Title ").
5.2 Normandale's Objections. Within twenty (20) days after receiving the
Title Commitment, Normandale will make written objections
( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title Commitment.
Normandale's failure to make Objections within such time period will
constitute waiver of Objections. The encumbrances listed on Exhibit A
hereto, the building size and height restrictions and set back
requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract (unless such
restrictions and requirements shall terminate pursuant to paragraph
9.1 hereof), the real estate taxes and special assessments to be paid by
Normandale pursuant to paragraph 4.3 hereof and any matter shown
on such Title Commitment and not objected to by Normandale shall :kv
a "Permitted Encumbrance" hereunder and not Objections. Edina . %.I:1
have 60 days after receipt of the Objections to cure the Objections,
during which period the Closing will be postponed, if necessary. Edina
shall correct any Objections.
5.3 Title Policy. Edina shall obtain for Normandale at Closing a title poli<<,
( "Title Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a
suitably marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking
to issue a Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment a,
reasonably approved by Normandale at standard rates.
5
6. Operation Prior to Closing. Edina shall execute no contracts, leases
or other agreements regarding the Development Property during the Purchase '
Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of
the Closing Date or the proper termination of this Contract, that are not terminable
on or before the Closing Date, without the prior written consent of Normandale,
which consent may be' withheld by Normandale at its sole discretion. Edina shall.
remove the building and other improvements now located on the Development
Property as soon as reasonably possible after the date of this Contract. Edina shall
not develop or permit the development of any wetlands on the Development .
Property. Edina shall use (from the date hereof until termination of this Contract or
closing of the transaction contemplated hereby) the Development Property for a
"qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota
Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option, Edina shall remove all of its personal property from the
Development Property prior to Closing.
7. Representations and Warranties.
7.1 Normandale represents and warrants to Edina that Normandale is
duly organized, qualified and in good standing, and has the requisite
power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract.
Normandale will indemnify Edina, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold
Edina, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including;
reasonable attorneys' fees, that Edina incurs'because of the breach of any of the
above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or
after Closing.
7.2 Edina represents and warrants to Normandale'as follows:
7.2.1 Existence; Authority. Edina is duly organized municipal
corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite
power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract.
7.2.2 Wells. Edina represents that there are no "Wells" within the
meaning of Minn. Stat. §103I on the Development Property.
7.2.3 Comprehensive Plan. Edina represents that Edina has amended
its Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Proper t v
as office.
Edina will indemnify Normandale, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold
Normandale, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages,
2
including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Normandale incurs because' of the breach
of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is
discovered before or after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Normandale is
purchasing the Development Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry
and is not relying on any representation of Edina or other person and is agreeing to
accept and purchase the Development, Property "as is, where is" subject to the
conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties,
representations and covenants herein contained.
8. Covenants.
8.1 Hazardous Substances. Edina shall not and shall not permit any toxic
or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without
limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as
polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil
and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined
in any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the
protection of the environment) to be generated, treated, stored or disposed of, or
otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Development Property.
8.2 Subdivision. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina will, at
Edina's sole expense, promptly commence and thereafter diligently proceed to
complete prior to the Closing Date a division of the Development Property from the
balance of the Property in accordance with all applicable laws. No person other than
Edina shall be required to pay any monies or make any dedications to Edina in
connection with such division in satisfaction of any park or open space, or similar,
dedication requirements or otherwise except as provided in this Contract. All
charges for preparation of, review of, and filing and recording of, a final plat or.
Registered Land Survey to divide the Development Property from the balance of the
Property shall be paid by, Edina, except that at Closing, Normandale shall pay to
Edina one -half of the actual costs paid by Edina to a surveyor to prepare the plat or
Registered Land Survey, if required.
8.3 Reza Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Normandale shall, at
Normandale's sole expense, within thirty (30) days after the exercise of the Purchase
Option W request, apply and petition for rezoning of the Development Property to
Subdivision POD -1 (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) so that
Normandale can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings (a)
with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross
floor area is defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) for all buildings on the
Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet,
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top
mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to
setback lines as shown on Exhibit, C attached hereto and made a part hereof, .which
7
restrictions and limitations set forth in the foregoing subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c)
are hereby imposed for the benerit of Edina, and (ii) submit all information,
documentation and other material necessary for Edina to evaluate, consider and act
upon Normandale's request, application and petition for such rezoning.
Normandale agrees to comply with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of
Edina, including but not limited to any required plat or registered land survey, with
respect to such rezoning. Edina shall join in any such rezoning request, application
or petition if required by the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. Edina hereby waives the
requirement that any sign be installed on the Development Property in connection
with such rezoning; provided, however, that Edina reserves the right to install any
such sign on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning. No fees
will be charged to Normandale by Edina in connection with such rezoning.
8.4 Maintenance. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale
exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination
of this Contract, Edina shall maintain the Development Property and neither
Normandale nor any other person or party shall have the right to use the
Development Property for any purpose unless agreed to and approved by Edina.
During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase
Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina
shall not construct any structures on the Development Property that cost in the
aggregate in excess $20,000.
8.5 Termination and Gift. In the event Normandale does not exercise the
Purchase Option before the expiration of the Purchase Option Term, the Purchase
Option shall, without further action or demand, terminate and upon the
termination of the Purchase Option, Edina shall issue a resolution for the Fair
Market Value of the Development Property, as of the date of the termination of the
Purchase Option as a gift from Normandale to Edina. For purposes of this Contract
"Fair Market Value of the Development Property" means the cash price the seller of
the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to sell the
Development Property, would receive from the buyer of the Development Property,
being willing but under no compulsion to buy the Development Property, taking
into consideration then current conditions and the marketplace for comparable
transactions and assuming buyer could have bought same pursuant to the
provisions of this Contract and such provisions were effective to allow such
purchase.
8.6 Improvements. In determining what, if any, improvements must be
made in connection with the development of the Development Property, Edina
shall apply normal and customary processes, procedures and standards and will not
treat the Development Property any differently than other similar developments in
Edina recognizing that to a certain extent each development is unique.
Rl
8.7 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. During the Purchase
Option Term, Normandale shall have the right, at Normandale's sole cost and
expense, before any delinquency occurs to contest, by appropriate proceedings
conducted diligently and in good faith, the real estate taxes and any special
assessments affecting the Development Property provided that (i) Normandale shall
have given prior written notice to Edina of Normandale's intent to so contest, (ii)
Normandale shall not postpone the payment of any such tax or special assessments
for such length of time as shall permit the Development Property, or any lien
thereon created by such item being contested, to be sold, or for any penalty or
interest to be imposed or to accrue, for the nonpayment thereof, and (iii) such
contest shall not interfere with the use or occupancy of the Development Property
or any part thereof.
8.8 Access and Inspection. Upon Normandale's exercise of the Purchase
Option, Edina shall allow Normandale, and Normandale's agents, access to the
Development Property without charge and at all reasonable times for the purpose of
Normandale's investigation and testing the same. Edina shall make available to
Normandale and Normandale's agents without charge copies of all plans and
specifications; records, maps, soil tests, engineering studies, inventories,
environmental reports, permits and correspondence in Edina's possession relating
to Hazardous Substances affecting the Development Property, and the right to
interview employees of Edina who may have knowledge of such matters.
Normandale shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall
restore the Development Property to as nearly as possible the condition it was in
immediately prior to such investigation and testing, and shall hold Edina and the
Development Property harmless from all costs and liabilities relating to
Normandale's activities except such liabilities arising solely out of information
produced or obtained as a result of Normandale's activities.
8.9 Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Edina acknowledges and agrees
that the preliminary approval of the subdivision of the Development Property frorn
the balance of the Property involves a planned and staged development referred to
in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 3c. Therefore, Edina determines it to be
reasonable and appropriate that during the Purchase Option Term and, if
Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or 0,A-
termination of this Contract, the subdivision shall not be deemed abandoned or
withdrawn or of no effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Zoning
Ordinance of Edina.
8.10 Berm. In the event Normandale acquires the Development Propert. ,
Normandale agrees (a) not to remove or alter the berm, or any living shrubs, trees
and other plants thereon, shown on the plan (the "Berm Plan ") attached hereto as
Exhibit E and made a part hereof without obtaining the prior written consent and
approval of Edina and (b) to replace in accordance -with the Berm Plan any shrubs,
trees and other plants thereon that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to
such an extent that based upon a standard of reasonableness both as to function and
appearance any such shrub, tree or other plant should be replaced.
9. Termination of Restrictions and Limitations.
9.1 If Normandale has complied with all requirements of this Contract and
the Zoning Ordinances of Edina and if Edina within 120 days after the exercise of the
Purchase Option shall not have completed a nonappealable division of the
Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the rezoning
of the Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is not obtained, or both,
the restrictions and limitations set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of
paragraph 8.3 hereof shall terminate. Such termination shall not reduce or waive
any of Edina's obligations under this Contract.
10. Casualty; Condemnation. If eminent domain proceedings are
threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Development Property after
Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall immediately give notice to
Normandale, and Normandale shall have the right to terminate this Contract by
giving notice within thirty (30) days after Edina's notice if given. If Normandale
shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Edina shall
assign to Normandale all rights to appear in and receive any award from such
proceedings.
11. Broker's Commission. Edina and Normandale represent to each
other that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection
with this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless
from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or
commissions resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the
execution or performance of this Contract, and will pay all costs of defending any
action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the
other party, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
12. Assignment. ment. Edina may not assign its rights under this Contract
without obtaining the prior written consent of Normandale. Normandale may
assign its rights under this Contract and the consent of Edina to such assignment
shall not be required; provided, however, that any such assignment shall not relieve
Normandale of its obligations under this Contract.
13. Survival. All of the terms of this Contract and warranties and
representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing.
10
14. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be
given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if
mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by
mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable
overnight courier, properly addressed as follows:
If to Normandale: Normandale Golf, Inc.
c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 150
Minnetonka, MN 55440
Fax #: (612) 938 -3346
If to Edina: City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attn: City Manager
Fax #: (612) 927 -7645
Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of
mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is
given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the
other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing,
transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by
giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change.
15. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in
this Contract are for convenience only, are not a part of this Contract, and are not to
be considered in interpreting this Contract. This written Contract constitutes the
complete agreement between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to
purchase the Development Property and supersedes any prior oral or written
agreements between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase
the Development Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this
Contract, and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing
executed by the parties. This Contract binds and benefits the parties and their
successors and assigns. This Contract has been made under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. Time is of the essence.
16. Recce Edina and Normandale agree that this Option and
Development Contract or a short form thereof shall be recorded at Normandale's
expense.
16. Remedies. If Normandale defaults under this Contract, Edina shall
have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to Normandale. If
11
Normandale fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this
Contract will terminate, time being of the essence of this Contract. The termination
of this Contract will be the sole remedy available to Edina for such default by
Normandale, and Normandale will not be liable for damages or specific
performance. If Edina defaults under this Contract, this provision does not preclude
Normandale from seeking and recovering from Edina damages for nonperformance
or specific performance of this Contract.
Edina and Normandale have executed this Contract as of the date first
written above.
Date of Signature
,19
Date of Signature
,19
12
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC.
By—
Its
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its Mayor
And
Its Manager
STATE OF )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,1992, by the of
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the
corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,1992, by and , the
mayor and manager, respectively, of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB)
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
13
EXHIBIT A
(To Option and Development Contract)
Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of
Hennepin, Minnesota.
Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances):
1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records,
Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121.
EXHIBIT B -
(To Option and Development Contract)
(Development Property)
That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota. lying South of a line
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the
North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30
seconds .East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence
North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 31
minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds
East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence
South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of
Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating.
EXHIBIT D -
(To Option and Development Contract)
(Storm Sewer Easement)
EASEMENT FOR STORM SEWER
THIS INSTRUMENT, made as of the day of
by and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Grantor ")
and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota ( "City ").
WITNESSETH;
That the Grantor, in consideration of One and No /100 Dollars ($1.00)
and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand paid by the City, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, does grant, bargain,
sell, convey and warrant to the City a non - exclusive easement in perpetuity for
underground storm sewer and drainage system purposes, and including the right of
the City and its contractors, agents and representatives, to enter for the purpose of
installing, constructing, maintaining, altering, repairing; reinstalling and
reconstructing an underground storm sewer and drainage system, including,
without limitation, underground pipes, surface level catch basins, surface level man
holes, surface level storm sewer grates and openings and other surface level and
underground appurtenances to service, maintain and operate the underground
system, in, under and across the property situate in the County of Hennepin and
State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit I attached hereto and hereby made a
part hereof.
In the event it is necessary for the City to remove, injure or destroy a n
landscaping, trees, sodding, sprinkler systems, irrigation systems, driveways,
walkways, curbs or similar items or improvements in connection with the
permitted use or uses of the easement as granted hereby, the City, without cost or
charge to Grantor, shall restore, replace or repair such improvements to the
condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the
extent reasonably possible; provided, however, that trees removed or destroyed in
excess of three inches caliper may be replaced by City with trees of at least two incheN
caliper.
Grantor agrees that it shall not construct any buildings or other
structures which would materially interfere with the use of the easement granted
hereby to City. The easement granted hereby shall not be deemed to prohibit
Grantor from installing within the easement area (i) landscaping, irrigation system..
driveways, walkways, signs and curbs (in accordance with all applicable laws and
ordinances); and (ii) structures other than those listed at (i) above, provided that
such installation is done in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances and
such structures do not materially interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of
the easement area by City. The Grantor also understands and agrees that City has no
duty to maintain any such installations made by or for Grantor and now or hereafter
within the easement area granted hereby. If Grantor, in connection with such
installation, shall remove, injure or destroy any of the underground or surface
portions of the storm sewer and drainage system then on or under the easement
area, Grantor, without cost or charge to City, shall restore, replace or repair such
system to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or
destruction to the extent reasonably possible.
The provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on,
and inure to the benefit of, Grantor and City, and their respective successors and
assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused this
instrument to be duly executed the day and year first above written.
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC.
M
Its
And
Its
STATE OF )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,19 , by and , the
and respectively, of NORMANDALE GOLF,
INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB)
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
P A : I am
(To Storm Sewer Easement)
That part of Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, said point also
being the Southwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Files of the
Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence West along the South line
of said Tract R 10.00 feet, thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A
338.98 feet; thence West 36.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said
Tract A 10.00 feet; thence East 36.00 feet to a point on a line 10.00 feet West of and
parallel with the West line of said Tract A; thence North parallel with the West line
of said Tract A 134.93 feet; thence East 10.00 feet to point on the Northerly extension
of the West line of said Tract A; thence South along the West line of said Tract A
and its Northerly extension 483.91 feet to the most Southerly Southeast corner of
said Tract R, the point of commencement, and there terminating.
EXHIBIT E -
(To Option and Development Contract)
( "Berm Plan ")
EXHIBIT C -
(Survey Requirements)
These items are to be included and shown on the survey:
1. The complete and correct legal description of the Land as shown on the title
insurance commitment or preliminary title report.
2. The location of all recorded easements and unrecorded easements
ascertainable by an inspection of the Land, which benefit or burden the Land.
(Note: All recorded easements are to be identified by a document recording
number or other document reference.)
3. The location of all adjoining streets, roads, highways and alleys, with names,
rights -of -way widths and distances from the Land noted.
4. The location of public access to the Land.
5. A directional indicator.
6. The street address of any existing improvements, if known.
7. The dimensions of the Land and the dimensions and locations of existing
improvements as measured in both directions from property lines.
8. Location of walkways, if any.
9. Location of ingress and egress (curb cuts and driveways).
10. The perimeter dimensions of existing improvements.
11. Interior lot lines, if any.
12. The location of existing connections and on site utility and service lines for
natural gas, electricity, water, and sanitary and storm sewers.
13. The area of the Land.
14. The boundaries of the Land, with directions and distances of the boundary
lines and showing discrepancies, if any, between measured, platted and
recorded directions and distances.
15. The following certification of surveyor.
(Seal)
" I certify to [insert names of Buyer, Seller, and Title] and to their heirs,
successors and assigns, that I have surveyed, on the ground, the
property legally described hereon; that said legal description is correct,
complete and accurate; that this plat of survey is true and correct in all
respects; that the size, dimensions and locations of all of the boundaries
of the property (including the directions and distances of all boundary
lines, and any discrepancies between measured, platted and recorded
directions and distances), buildings and other improvements, recorded
and visible unrecorded easements, streets, roads, means of public
access, rights -of -way, and utility lines and connections which affect said
property are correctly and accurately shown hereon; and that there are
no encroachments, overlaps, gaps, easements, streets, roads,
rights -of -way or improvements which affect the property, which are
not shown hereon."
Dated this day of ,19
[LICENSED SURVEYOR'S NAMEI
By [ORIGINAL SIGNATUREI
+ MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE FDHIIBIT D
PLEASE TYPE ALL INFORMATION Cn
A. PROPERTY SELLER INFORMATION
Seller's last name ,
Date of closing the sale s Total number-of wells
M M D D Y Y
B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Attach a legal description of property in addition to�'the applicable property
information requested below.
J
'House number Street. name Type Direction
City Zip code
If applicable.
I,, ,
Addition am
ne Block number Lot number
C. PROPERTY BUYER INFORMATION
,
First name MI Last•name
, , , , , , , , I , , 1 , , , , . , , , , , , 1 . , . , , , . , . , , . 1
Company name if applicable
Address
Address
City State Zip code
Phone number
D. CERTIFICATION BY SELLER
I aw" that the Wrkwma*m provided on thb oerllAoat,s Is a=am and oomplet' w the beet of my wwwledge.
Signature of Sailor or Designated Rsprssentattve of Sauer Dame
E. CERTIFICATION BY BUYER
h the absence of a WWI ngnaturs. B» buyer. or pweon auftft d to so on b~ of the DuY� may sign this well cute. No
signature is mqufnd by fw buyer If ft seller hoe signed above.
Bated on disdoaure Information prfded to me by the felbr or other avallabM trdartn MW, 1 ow" that tM Urhorrruaon ortmdsd above
is aoourste and oompbte m the an of my wow"".
Signature of Buyer or Designated Aspreavamve of Buyer DIM
F. CONTRACT FOR DEED PROPERTY TRANSFERS DEED ONLY
The buyer, or person authodrod to sot on bsW of ft buyer, must sign a won owdoeure cwimaae for W warranty oeew green in
fumumem of a awmaa for deed. f titan are no iatown weue an the property, ohealt 1M bas below.
1 as" %@1 1 la, am of no *vela on the property desortbed herein.
Signature of Buyer or Designated Represenranve of Buyer Dots
NINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE
WELL INFORMATION an
Fill out a separate fors for each well located on the property.
A. WELL LOCATION
County . , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , I 1 , 1 , l , , 1 , J--L" , == , , , , , , J—&" 4--L—L"
Townw* nem� Ouerrr QWW Ouew Querw 8e� -tlon no. T . F"e „o.
B. WELL USE INFORMATION '
I. , , , , L_," Unique well number (if known). 2. Well depth (feet).
3. Year of construction. 4. _ Well type (Me vn.).
5. Permit number if current maintenance permit exists.
6. Well is: ❑ in use m ❑ not in use m ❑ sealed by licensed well contractor (3)
Year well was sealed.
C. SKETCH MAP
Please use the space below to sketch the location of the well. Include distances from
fixed reference points such as streets and buildings.
Ulametlw pmvkW an 90 bnn is cWsW .a d publb W#g"nS*M under hLva oft 9biWM. CAepw I&
4 td m
(Description of above ground tank)
EMHIBIT F -
(Development Property)
That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota lying South of a line
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the
North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30
seconds East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence
North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet, thence North 87 degrees 31
minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds
East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence
South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of
Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating.
EXHIBIT G -
(Berm Plan)
919A
OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
THIS OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ( "Contract ") is
made as of the day of September, 1992 (the "Commencement Date "), by and
between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Edina "), and
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, ( "Normandale ").
BACKGROUND:
A. Edina has purchased from Normandale certain real property located in
the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof (the 'Property").
B. Edina has given preliminary approval to a subdivision of that part of
the Property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the
"Development Property ") from the balance of the Property and certain conditions
have been imposed in connection with such approval.
C. Edina and Normandale desire to enter into this Contract not only with
Edina as owner, but as provided in Section 810 of the Ordinance of Edina and in
Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 2a., 3c. and 4b.(6).
AGREEMENT:
In consideration of the foregoing premises and other valuable
consideration, Edina and Normandale agree as follows:
1. Purchase Option. Edina grants to Normandale an option ('Purchase
Option ") to purchase the Development Property for One Dollar ($1.00).
Normandale shall exercise such Purchase Option, if at all, by giving a written notice
to Edina after the Commencement Date and before the sixteenth (16th) anniversary
of the Commencement Date ( "Purchase Option Term "). In the event Normandale
fails to exercise the Purchase Option during the Purchase Option Term this Contract
shall, without further action or demand, terminate and be of no further force or
effect. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, Edina and
Normandale shall each execute and deliver to the other an agreement (the
"Termination Agreement ") in recordable and customary form evidencing the
termination of this Contract.
2. Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by the
Purchase Option (the "Closing ") will occur on the date (the "Closing Date" which is
the earlier of (a) the date 120 days after the date upon which Normandale exercises
the Purchase Option or (b) the date that is the later of (i) the date five (5) business
days after Normandale has waived or been deemed to have waived all Objections
(as defined in paragraph 5.2 of this Contract) or such Objections have been cured by
Edina, or (ii) the date five (5) days after Edina completes a nonappealable division of
the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract, or (iii) the
date five days after the rezoning of the Development Property as required by
Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is obtained. The Closing will take place at 9:00 a.m.
local time at the office selected by Edina. Edina agrees to deliver possession of the
Development Property to Normandale on the Closing Date.
3. Closing Documents.
3.1 On the Closing Date, Edina shall execute and deliver to Normandale
the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to
Normandale:
3.1.1 Deed. Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Development
Property to Normandale, free and clear of all encumbrances,
except the Permitted Encumbrances hereafter defined and except
for the building size and height restrictions and set back
requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract which
shall- be set forth in said Limited Warranty Deed and'shall run
with the title to the Development Property and every part
thereof and interest therein and shall be binding upon all
persons, parties and entities having or acquiring any right, title,
interest or estate in the Development Property, or any part
thereof.
3.1.2 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed,
containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue
Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations.
3.1.3 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by
Edina, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and
federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in
the Development Property.
3.1.4 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of
Real Estate Value in customary form.
3.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate
certificate of title regarding the Development Property.
2
3.1.6 Termination. Termination of Memorandum of this Contract
which may have been recorded.
3.1.7 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other
documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the
Development Property to Normandale free and clear of all
encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to
the provisions hereof.
3.2 On the Closing Date, Normandale shall (a) execute, deliver and grant to
Edina a perpetual, non - exclusive easement for storm sewer purposes
in substantially the form and content of, and over, under and across
the portion of the Development Property described in, the easement
attached hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof and (b) execute and
deliver an agreement in recordable form evidencing and confirming
the agreement set forth in paragraph 8.9 hereof.
4. Prorations. Edina and Normandale agree to the following pro- rations and
allocation of costs regarding this Contract:
4.1 Title Insurance and Closing; Fee. Normandale will pay all costs of the
Title Commitment, the title policy issued pursuant to the Title
Commitment and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by
Title.
4.2 Deed Tax. Edina shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection
with this transaction and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed
by Title.
4.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments.
4.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes against the Development
Property payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and
including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar
year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by
Edina on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the
Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the
Closing Date occurs shall be prorated as of the Closing Date.
Except as provided in paragraph 4.3.3 hereof, all real estate taxes
against the Development Property appropriately pro -rated on an
area basis if the Development Property is part of a larger tax
parcel payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in
which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by
Normandale except that Edina shall pay any real estate taxes
3
related to; improvements not located on the Development
Property.
4.3.2 Special Assessments. All installments of special assessments
levied against all or any part of the Development Property
payable in .1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including
the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in
which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or
before Closing. All installments of special assessments levied
against all or any part of the Development Property payable in
the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be pro
rated as of the Closing Date. All installments of special
assessments levied or pending against all or any part of the
Development Property payable in the calendar years after the
calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in
full by Normandale. In the event any such special assessment is
levied and assessed against property which includes the
Development Property, such special assessment shall be
equitably divided and allocated so that the special assessments
levied against the Development Property are separate from the
special assessments against the balance of the property of which
the Development Property is a part. Edina agrees that no special
assessments shall be levied by Edina against the Development
Property due to the division of the Property pursuant to
Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the development by Edina of a
golf course on the Property.
4.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary
notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the
Development Property is now valued and assessed under
Minnesota Statutes, § 273.112. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option within five (5) years after the date of this
Contract, after the Closing Normandale assumes the full risk of
the imposition against the Development Property of additional
taxes pursuant to said § 273.112, and if such additional taxes are
imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall have no
obligation to pay the same. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option more than five (5) years after the date of this
Contract, Edina assumes the full risk of the imposition against
the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said
§273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the
Development Property, Edina shall pay the same.
4
4.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated
between Edina and Normandale as of the Closing Date, so that Edina
pays that part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and
Normandale pays that part of operating costs accruing from and after
the Closing Date.
4.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees,
except that a party defaulting under this Contract will pay the
reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the nondefaulting
party to enforce its rights hereunder.
5. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows:
5.1 Edina's Title Evidence. Normandale shall, within twenty (20) days
after the exercise of the Purchase Option, obtain a commitment ( "Title
Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B 1970 Owner's Policy of Title
Insurance insuring title to the Real Property, deleting standard
exceptions and including affirmative insurance regarding contiguity,
appurtenant easements and such other matters as may be identified by
Normandale, in the amount of the Fair Market Value of the
Development Property (as defined in Paragraph 8.5 of this Contract),
issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota ( "Title ").
5.2 Normandale's Objections. Within twenty (20) days after receiving the
Title Commitment, Normandale will make written objections '
( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title Commitment.
Normandale's failure to make Objections within such time period will
constitute waiver of Objections. The encumbrances listed on Exhibit A
hereto, the building size and height restrictions and set back
requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract (unless such
restrictions and requirements shall terminate pursuant to paragraph
9.1 hereof), the real estate taxes and special assessments to be paid by
Normandale pursuant to paragraph 4.3 hereof and any matter shown
on such Title Commitment and not objected to by Normandale shall be
a "Permitted Encumbrance" hereunder and not Objections. Edina will
have 60 days after receipt of the Objections to cure the Objections,
during which period the Closing will be postponed, if necessary. Edina
shall correct any Objections.
5.3 Title Policy. Edina shall obtain for Normandale at Closing a title policy
( "Title Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a
suitably marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking
to issue a Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment as
reasonably approved by Normandale at standard rates.
5
6. Operation Prior to Closing. Edina shall execute no contracts, leases
or other agreements regarding the Development Property during the Purchase
Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of
the Closing Date or the proper termination of this Contract, that are not terminable
on or before the Closing Date, without the prior written consent of Normandale,
which consent may be withheld by Normandale at its sole discretion. Edina shall
remove the building and other improvements now located on the Development
Property as soon as reasonably possible after the date of this Contract. Edina shall
not develop or permit the development of any wetlands on the Development
Property. Edina shall use (from the date hereof until termination of this Contract or
closing of the transaction contemplated hereby) the Development Property for a
"qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota
Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. If Normandale exercises the
Purchase Option, Edina shall remove all of its personal property from the
Development Property prior to Closing.
7. Representations and Warranties.
7.1 Normandale represents and warrants to Edina that Normandale is
duly organized, qualified and in good standing, and has the requisite
power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract.
Normandale will indemnify Edina, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold
Edina, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, that Edina incurs because of the breach of any of the
above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or
after Closing.
7.2 Edina represents and warrants to Normandale as follows:
7.2.1 Existence; Authority. Edina is duly organized municipal
corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite
power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract.
7.2.2 Wells. Edina represents that there are no "Wells" within the
meaning of Minn. Stat. §103I on the Development Property.
7.2.3 Comprehensive Plan. Edina represents that Edina has amended
its Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Property
as office.
Edina wilt indemnify Normandale, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold
Normandale, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages,
0
including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Normandale incurs because of the breach
of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is
discovered before or after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Normandale is
purchasing the Development Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry
and is not relying on any representation of Edina or other person and is agreeing to
accept and purchase the Development Property "as is, where is" subject to the
conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties,
representations and covenants herein contained.
8. Covenants.
8.1 Hazardous Substances. Edina shall not and shall not permit any toxic
or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without
limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as
polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil
and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined
in any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the
protection of the environment) to be generated, treated, stored or disposed of, or
otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Development Property.
8.2 Subdivision. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina will, at
Edina's sole expense, promptly commence and thereafter diligently proceed to
complete prior to the Closing Date a division of the Development Property from the
balance of the Property in accordance with all applicable laws. No person other than
Edina shall be required to pay any monies or make any dedications to Edina in
connection with such division in satisfaction of any park or open space, or similar,
dedication requirements or otherwise except as provided in this Contract. All
charges for preparation of, review of, and filing and recording of, a final plat or
Registered Land Survey to divide the Development Property from the balance of the
Property shall be paid by Edina, except that at Closing, Normandale shall pay to
Edina one -half of the actual costs paid by Edina to a surveyor to prepare the plat or
Registered Land Survey, if required.
8.3 Rezoning. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Normandale shall, at
Normandale's sole expense, within thirty (30) days after the exercise of the Purchase
Option (i) request, apply and petition for rezoning of the Development Property to
Subdivision POD -1 (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) so that
Normandale can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings (a)
with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross
floor area is defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) for all buildings on the
Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet,
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top
mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to
setback lines as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof, which
M
restrictions and limitations set forth in the foregoing subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c)
are hereby imposed for the benefit of Edina, and (ii) submit all information,
documentation and other material necessary for Edina to evaluate, consider and act
upon Normandale's request, application and petition for such rezoning.
Normandale agrees to comply with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of
Edina, including but not limited to any required plat or registered land survey, with
respect to such rezoning. Edina shall join in any such rezoning request, application
or petition if required by the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. Edina hereby waives the
requirement that any sign be installed on the Development Property in connection
with such rezoning; provided, however, that Edina reserves the right to install any
such sign on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning. No fees
will be charged to Normandale by Edina in connection with such rezoning.
8.4 Maintenance. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale
exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination
of this Contract, Edina shall maintain the Development Property and neither
Normandale nor any other person or party shall have the right to use the
Development Property for any purpose unless agreed to and approved by Edina.
During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase
Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina
shall not construct any structures on the Development Property that cost in the
aggregate in excess $20,000.
8.5 Termination and Gift. In the event Normandale does not exercise the
Purchase Option before the expiration of the Purchase Option Term, the Purchase
Option shall, without further action or demand, terminate and upon the
termination of the Purchase Option, Edina shall issue a resolution for the Fair
Market Value of the Development Property, as of the date of the termination of the
Purchase Option as a gift from Normandale to Edina. For purposes of this Contract
"Fair Market Value of the Development Property" means the cash price the seller of
the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to sell the
Development Property, would receive from the buyer of the Development Property,
being willing but under no compulsion to buy the Development Property, taking
into consideration then current conditions and the marketplace for comparable
transactions and assuming buyer could have bought same pursuant to the
provisions of this Contract and such provisions were effective to allow such
purchase.
8.6 Improvements. In determining what, if any, improvements must be
made in connection with the development of the Development Property, Edina
shall apply normal and customary processes, procedures and standards and will not
treat the Development Property any differently than other similar developments in
Edina recognizing that to a certain extent each development is unique.
E:3
8.7 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. During the Purchase
Option Term, Normandale shall have the right, at Normandale's sole cost and
expense, before any delinquency occurs to contest, by appropriate proceedings
conducted diligently and in good faith, the real estate taxes and any special
assessments affecting the Development Property provided that (i) Normandale shall
have given prior written notice to Edina of Normandale's intent to so contest, (ii)
Normandale shall not postpone the payment of any such tax or special assessments
for such length of time as shall permit the Development Property, or any lien
thereon created by such item being contested, to be sold, or for any penalty or
interest to be imposed or to accrue, for the nonpayment thereof, and (iii) such
contest shall not interfere with the use or occupancy of the Development Property
or any part thereof.
8.8 Access and Inspection. Upon Normandale's exercise of the Purchase
Option, Edina shall allow Normandale, and Normandale's agents, access to the
Development Property without charge and at all reasonable times for the purpose of
Normandale's investigation and testing the same. Edina shall make available to
Normandale and Normandale's agents without charge copies of all plans and
specifications, records, maps, soil tests; engineering studies, inventories,
environmental reports, permits and correspondence in Edina's possession relating
to Hazardous Substances affecting the Development Property; and the right to
interview employees of Edina who may have knowledge of such matters.
Normandale shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall
restore the Development Property to as nearly as possible the condition it was in
immediately prior to such investigation and testing, and shall hold Edina and the
Development Property harmless from all costs and liabilities relating to
Normandale's activities except such liabilities arising solely out of information
produced or obtained as a result of Normandale's activities.
8.9 Preliminary Subdivision A1212roval. Edina acknowledges and agrees
that the preliminary approval of the subdivision of the Development Property from
the balance of the Property involves a planned and staged development referred to
in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 3c. Therefore, Edina determines it to be
reasonable and appropriate that during the Purchase Option Term and, if
Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the
termination of this Contract, the subdivision shall not be deemed abandoned or
withdrawn or of no effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Zoning
Ordinance of Edina.
8.10 Berm. In the event Normandale acquires the Development Property,
Normandale agrees (a) not to remove or alter the berm, or any living shrubs, trees
and other plants thereon, shown on the plan (the "Berm Plan ") attached hereto as
Exhibit E and made a part hereof without obtaining the prior written consent and
6
approval of Edina and (b) to replace in accordance with the Berm Plan any shrubs,
trees and other plants thereon that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to
such an extent that based upon a standard of reasonableness both as to function and
appearance any such shrub, tree or other plant should be replaced.
9. Termination of Restrictions and Limitations.
9.1 If Normandale has complied with all requirements of this Contract and
the Zoning Ordinances of Edina and if Edina within 120 days after the exercise of the
Purchase Option shall not have completed a nonappealable division of the
Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the rezoning
of the Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is not obtained, or both,
the restrictions and limitations set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of
paragraph 8.3 hereof shall terminate. Such termination shall not reduce or waive
any of Edina's obligations under this Contract.
10. Casualty; Condemnation. If eminent domain proceedings are
threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Development Property after
Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall immediately give notice to
Normandale, and Normandale shall have the right to terminate this Contract by
giving notice within thirty (30) days after Edina's notice if given. If Normandale
shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Edina shall
assign to Normandale all rights to appear in and receive any award from such
proceedings.
11. Broker's Commission. Edina and Normandale represent to each
other that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection
with this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless
from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or
commissions resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the
execution or performance of this Contract, and will pay all costs of defending any
action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the
other party, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
12. Assignment. Edina may not assign its rights under this Contract
without obtaining the prior written consent of Normandale. Normandale may
assign its rights under this Contract and the consent of Edina to such assignment
shall not be required; provided, however, that any such assignment shall not relieve
Normandale of its obligations under this Contract.
13. Survival. All of the terms of this Contract and warranties and
representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing.
10
14. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be
given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if
mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by
mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable
overnight courier, properly addressed as follows:
If to Normandale: Normandale Golf, Inc.
c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 150
Minnetonka, MN 55440
Fax #: (612) 938 -3346
If to Edina: City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attn: City Manager
Fax #: (612) 927 -7645
Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of
mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is
given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the
other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing,
transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by
giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change.
15. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in
this Contract are for convenience only, are not a part of this Contract, and are not to
be considered in interpreting this Contract. This written Contract constitutes the
complete agreement between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to
purchase the Development Property and supersedes any prior oral or written
agreements between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase
the Development Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this
Contract, and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing
executed by the parties. This Contract binds and benefits the parties and their
successors and assigns. This Contract has been made under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. Time is of the essence.
16. Recording. Edina and Normandale agree that this Option and
Development Contract or a short form thereof shall be recorded at Normandale's
expense.
16. Remedies. If Normandale defaults under this Contract, Edina shall
have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to Normandale. If
11
Normandale fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this
Contract will terminate, time being of the essence of this Contract. The termination
of this Contract will be the sole remedy available to Edina for such default by
Normandale, and Normandale will not be liable for damages or specific
performance. If Edina defaults under this Contract, this provision does not preclude
Normandale from seeking and recovering from -Edina damages for nonperformance
or specific performance of this Contract.
Edina and Normandale have executed this Contract as of the date first
written above.
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC.
Date of Signature By
Its
,19
Date of Signature
,19
CITY OF EDINA
A
By
Its Mayor
12
And
Its Manager
STATE OF )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,1992, by the of
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the
corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1 1992, by and , the
mayor and manager, respectively, of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB)
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
13
Notary Public
EXHIBIT A -
(To Option and Development Contract)
Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of
Hennepin, Minnesota.
Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances):
1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records,
Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121.
EXHIBIT B .
(To Option and Development Contract)
(Development Property)
That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota lying South of a line
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the
North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30
seconds East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence
North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 31
minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds
East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence
South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of
Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating.
EXHIBIT C .� N89° 26' 43' E
O°�'— — —
(To Development Contract) Oz 225. 00'
N86° 53' 37' E
� o
t �I� PROPOSED BUILDING SITE
kid CONTAINS 6. 2 ACRES I
° I
PROPOSED NORTH
SETBACK LIMITS I
/ SCALE. in —80
R -577'
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEV. 822.0
/ TOP BUILDING 861.0
/ I
/ I
I
I
N. 77TH ST
EXHIBIT D
(To Option and Development Contract)
(Storm Sewer Easement)
EASEMENT FOR STORM SEWER
THIS INSTRUMENT, made as of the day of ,
by and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Grantor ")
and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota ( "City ").
WITNESSETH;
That the Grantor, in consideration of One and No /100 Dollars ($1.00)
and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand paid by the City, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, does grant, bargain,
sell, convey and warrant to the City a non - exclusive easement in perpetuity for
underground storm sewer and drainage system purposes, and including the right of
the City and its contractors, agents and representatives, to enter for the purpose of
installing, constructing, maintaining, altering, repairing, reinstalling and
reconstructing an underground storm sewer and drainage system, including,
without limitation, underground pipes, surface level catch basins, surface level man
holes, surface level storm sewer grates and openings and other surface level and
underground appurtenances to service, maintain and operate the underground
system, in, under and across the property situate in the County of Hennepin and
State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit I attached hereto and hereby made a
part hereof.
In the event it is necessary for the City to remove, injure or destroy any
landscaping, trees, sodding, sprinkler systems, irrigation systems, driveways,
walkways, curbs or similar items or improvements in connection with the
permitted use or uses of the easement as granted hereby, the City, without cost or
charge to Grantor, shall restore, replace or repair such improvements to the
condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the
extent reasonably possible; provided, however, that trees removed or destroyed in
excess of three inches caliper may be replaced by City with trees of at least two inches
caliper.
Grantor agrees that it shall not construct any buildings or other
structures which would materially interfere with the use of the easement granted
hereby to City. The easement granted hereby shall not be deemed to prohibit
Grantor from installing within the easement area (i) landscaping, irrigation systems,
driveways, walkways, signs and curbs (in accordance with all applicable laws and
ordinances); and (ii) structures other than those listed at (i) above, provided that
such installation is done in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances and
such structures do not materially interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of
the easement area by City. The Grantor also understands and agrees that City has no
duty to maintain any such installations made by or for Grantor and now or hereafter
within the easement area granted hereby. If Grantor, in connection with such
installation, shall remove, injure or destroy any of the underground or surface
portions of the storm sewer and drainage system then on or under the easement
area, Grantor, without cost or charge to City, shall restore, replace or repair such
system to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or
destruction to the extent reasonably possible.
The provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on,
and inure to the benefit of, Grantor and City, and their respective successors and
assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused this
instrument to be duly executed the day and year first above written.
NORMANDALE GOLF, INC.
By
Its
And
Its
STATE OF )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,19 , by and , the
and respectively, of NORMANDALE GOLF,
INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB)
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
�f
EXHIBIT I
(To Storm Sewer Easement)
That part of Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, said point also
being the Southwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Files of the
Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence West along the South line
of said Tract R 10.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A
338.98 feet; thence West 36.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said
Tract A 10.00 feet; thence East 36.00 feet to a point on a line 10.00 feet West of and
parallel with the West line of said Tract A; thence North parallel with the West line
of said Tract A 134.93 feet; thence East 10.00 feet to point on the Northerly extension
of the West line of said Tract A; thence South along the West line of said Tract A
and its Northerly extension 483.91 feet to the most Southerly Southeast corner of
said Tract R, the point of commencement, and there terminating.
EXHIBIT E
(To Option and Development Contract)
( "Berm Plan ")
V (C) .
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 15, 1992
9:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Gordon Hughes
Alison Fuhr
Robert Sherman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Craig Swanson
OTHERS PRESENT: Mrs. Helen Clausen, 4258 West 56th Street
Mr. Alan Ackerberg, 5117 Mirror Lakes Drive
Mr. Dennis Berkowitz, 4624 West 56th Street
Mr. Patrick Cronan, 6305 South Knoll Drive
Ms. Kathy Colwell, 5517 Knoll Drive
Ms. Martha Anderson, 6205 Parkwood Road
Ms. Darla Parrague, 4529 West 56th Street
Mr. Craig Wahl, 4520 West 56th Street
Mr. Larry Lawson, 4516 West 56th Street
Mrs. Renee Phelps, 6224 Knoll Drive
Ms. Cynthia Ryan, 5501 Knoll Drive
Ms. Donita Bunke, 5520 Knoll Drive
Mr. Scott Fischmann, 6233 Idylwood Lane
Mrs. Judy Berkowitz, 4624 West 56th Street
Mr. Bob Ballintine, 4620 West 56th Street
Mrs. Mary Ballintine, 4620 West 56th Street
Mr. Bruce Johnson, 4601 West 56th Street
Mrs. Barb Johnson, 4601 West 56th Street
Ms. Ruth Miller, 6305 South Knoll Drive
Mrs. Polly Kieper, 4608 West 56th Street
Mr. Mark Kieper, 4608 West 56th Street
STAFF PRESENT: Deputy Chief Leonard Kleven, Edina P.D.
Mr. Stephen Marston, Edina P.D.
Mr. Eric Felton, Edina P.D.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 2
(1) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 56th Street and St.
John's Avenue to a four -way "STOP."
Continued from August meeting
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Kleven began the discussion by reporting the .results of speed
surveys taken in the area between August 26th and September 11th.
Those surveys indicated a top speed of 43 miles per hour, and an
85th percentile for eastbound traffic of 29 miles per hour, and 31
miles per hour for westbound traffic. Mr. Marston reported that
the West 56th Street /St. John's Avenue area has not been an active
site for the Traffic Enforcement Unit, but his personal experience
has shown that the drainage dip in the roadway on West 56th Street
has a slowing effect on traffic. According Mr. Kleven, there have
been no reportable accidents in the area during the past three
years. Mr. Hoffman stated that, if the drainage dip is determined
to be the problem, it can be corrected by removing the dip and
adding two additional drainage basins. He added that some
residents have indicated that the dip slows down traffic, while
others believe motorists speed up to get past it. A number of
residents appeared before the Committee to express their concerns
regarding this issue:
Mrs. Helen Clausen described West 56th Street as a "race course,"
and thought that at least one "STOP" sign on West 56th Street
would slow down traffic.
Mrs. Judy Berkowitz stated that her main concern lies with the
speed of cars; they're travelling too fast, especially considering
the number of children in the neighborhood. It is her belief that
among the worst offenders are teenagers driving to and from school
and school bus drivers.
Mr. Bob Ballintine, a resident for eleven years, thought the
drainage dip had been originally installed to act as a speed
deterrent, but had not been successful as one. Mr. Hoffman
replied that the dip had been put in for storm drainage, not speed
control. At the time of installation, the Committee may have
indicated that any subsequent traffic slowdown would be a
beneficial by- product. Mr. Ballintine said that West 56th Street
should be treated as a residential street, not a through street,
and expressed his concerns for pedestrians, particularly those
walking at night.
Mr. Dennis Berkowitz summed up the issue as one of safety, both
for neighborhood children and motorists. He said that West 56th
Street is known as the "bump and fly" street by some motorists.
He believed that one solution to the problem might be to rotate
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 3
the current "STOP" sign at St. John's Avenue to West 56th Street.
Ms. Darla Parrague said the drainage dip has made the situation
worse than it had been before. With the high traffic speeds, she
doesn't allow her children to walk along West 56th Street. It is
her belief that West 58th Street is the route that should carry
traffic to the school, as none of those homes face the street.
She strongly requested that "STOP" signs be placed on West 56th
Street.
Mr. Craig Wahl's greatest concern was the number of children who
walk down West 56th Street. He concurred with the need for a
"STOP" sign.
Following the discussion with the residents, Mr. Hoffman
summarized the issue and suggested two possible solutions: (1)
relocating the 2 -way "STOP "; (2) and /or modifying the drainage
dip. He added that the two highest speeds recorded on the surveys
were by school busses, and that he had spoken with bus garage
personnel about the problem, who advised him to have the Police
Department ticket offending drivers in the future.
Mrs. Fuhr made a two -part motion as follows: (1) to recommend that
the current "STOP" signs on St. John's Avenue be rotated to West
56th Street. and (2) that the "dip" situation on West 56th Street
be corrected by changing the drainage pattern. Mr. Sherman
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(2) Discuss traffic safety concerns in the Parkwood Knolls area.
Continued from August meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman began by opening up the discussion to neighborhood
residents, many of whom were present to address this issue:
Mr. Pat Cronan, who contacted the Committee originally, expressed
his concerns over the safety of the approximately 30 children, age
11 and younger, residing in the area. He noted the increased
traffic moving north from Blake Road to Knoll Drive and South
Knoll Drive has resulted in fast speeds and a "reckless disregard"
for "STOP" signs. The problem, he said, is accentuated during the
school year. He offered several recommendations: (1) attempt to
reduce speed through the installation of 25- mile - per -hour advisory
signage; (2) install "CAUTION - CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs; (3) erect
an additional "STOP" sign at View Lane and South Knoll Drive to
help slow down traffic; and (4) paint crosswalks on Knoll Drive,
South Knoll Drive, and Schaefer Road. He also suggested that "NO
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 4
TURN" signage would help restrict travel for those motorists who
are cutting through the area to get to and from Opus.
Ms. Kathy Colwell, a resident for 25 years, noted her concerns
about excessive speed. She felt that a 25- mile - per -hour advisory
was necessary on all five intersecting streets, and requested a
"STOP" sign at Knoll Drive and Schaefer Road. She repeated the
request for a marked crosswalk at Knoll Drive and Schaefer Road.
In order to counteract traffic shortcutting through Parkwood
Knolls during the evening rush hour, she also suggested banning
right turns for northbound Lincoln Drive at Dovre Drive from 4 -6
P.M. Mr. Hoffman reminded her that turn restrictions would affect
residents as well as through traffic. He recalled that various
diversionary techniques had been attempted in the area previously,
but were eventually abandoned.
Ms. Martha Anderson noted that motorists northbound on Blake Road
are able to get up speed before entering Parkwood Knolls. If
speeds in the area cannot be legally lowered to 25 miles per hour,
she requested advisory signage to indicate the presence of
children.
Ms. Donita Bunke, a Knoll Drive resident, said that neighborhood
children are afraid to ride bikes and play in the street. She
said that crosswalks and cautionary signage should be in place as
a reminder to motorists that the roadway is not a speedway.
Ms. Cynthia Ryan believed that "STOP" signs have helped counteract
the speed problem, but that the area is still dangerous for
children. While many of the speeders are juvenile motorists, it
was her opinion that many adults were speeding, too, and that many
of them were not residents of the neighborhood.
Mr. Scott Fischmann stated that traffic levels are increasing, and
was aware that siphoning traffic off one street will only move it
onto another. His greatest concern was speed, not volume,
particularly for traffic eastbound on South Knoll Drive. He said
that motorists failing to stop at "STOP" signs is another problem.
He believed that 25- mile - per -hour advisory signage, additional
"STOP" signs, and "CAUTION - CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs would help
make a difference.
Ms. Anderson noted that speeds have not been contained on Blake
Road and Schaefer Road, and wondered if a dedicated enforcement
effort, such as that undertaken on Interlachen Boulevard, would
help lower speeds. Discussion followed about Minnesota's 30 -mile-
per -hour limit, and Mr. Hoffman stated that the best way to alter
that would be to contact state legislators and urge a change in
the law. He then asked the residents what the rationale was for a
crosswalk at the Knoll Drive /South Knoll Drive /Schaefer Road
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 5
intersection. They said the intersection is like a neighborhood
park, a meeting place, and unlike other intersections in the area.
Mr. Kleven noted that a speed analysis of the neighborhood had
been put on hold until the Blake Road construction project is
completed, to present a more accurate picture of traffic flow.
Mr. Hughes moved to recommend the following: (1) improve
visibility at the northeast quadrant of Schaefer Road and Knoll
Drive: (2) install 25- mile -ver -hour advisory signs along the
median area on Knoll Drive: (3) ask the Police Department to
consider this area for the Traffic Enforcement Unit: and (4) defer
further action on additional signage until the November meeting of
the Traffic Safety Committee, after completion of the Blake Road
construction project. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion
carried 3 -0. (Mr. Sherman had been called from the meeting
earlier, thus the discrepancy in the vote total).
(3) Discuss traffic safety concerns at Malibu Drive and Lincoln Drive.
Requested by Gordon Hughes, Traffic Safety Committee.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman noted that, because construction has been completed on
the eastern leg of Malibu Drive, Malibu now intersects with
northbound /southbound Lincoln Drive. The resulting intersection
has created a sharp angle which makes it difficult to see
approaching traffic. It is, therefore, a candidate for a 4 -way
"STOP" sign.- According to Mr. Hoffman, the only negative is that
one of the legs is a downgrade.
Mr. Hughes moved to recommend the installation of a 4 -way "STOP"
sign at the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Malibu Drive. Mrs.
Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
(4) Discuss traffic safety concerns regarding highway ramp metering.
Unscheduled agenda item requested by Alison Fuhr, Traffic Safety
Committee.
Mrs. Fuhr reported that she had recently ridden with the Edina
Paramedics and had noted a problem concerning metering of the
highway ramps. During peak traffic periods, the metering system
makes access to the highway all but impossible for emergency
vehicles, as traffic bunches up at the end of the ramps, blocking
entrance. Mr. Marston noted that, while police vehicles are
affected as well, the problem is not as severe because the smaller
squad cars have greater maneuverability. Mr. Kleven stated that
this issue had been discussed when metering was first proposed,
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 6
and Fire Department officials had expressed concerns over possible
blockage problems. Mr. Hughes asked whether it would be
appropriate for the Committee to act on behalf of the Police and
Fire Departments and present these concerns to the State. Mr.
Hoffman suggested that perhaps the initial focus should be on the
two public safety access points: West 50th Street and Highway 100,
and Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown.
Mr. Hughes moved to refer this item to the police and fire chiefs
for evaluation. so they may consider what supporting role the
Traffic Safety Committee could play in addressing metering
concerns. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Mirror Lakes Drive and
Northwood Drive.
Continued from August meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Kleven began with an overview of the radar speed surveys
conducted over a three -day period in September by the Police
Department. A total of 172 vehicles were monitored during the
survey, resulting in an 85th percentile of 30 miles per hour for
northbound traffic, and 32 miles per hour for southbound vehicles.
He recalled that the Committee had discussed speed in this area
previously, as Mirror Lakes Drive is a natural shortcut for
vehicles travelling between Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon
Avenue. Mr. Marston reported that he had conducted nearly 3 -3/4
hours of traffic enforcement on Mirror Lakes Drive over a recent
six -day period. He found no citable violations during that time.
While some speeds were over 30 miles per hour, none were high
enough to justify a citation. He also noted that above - ground
pipeline construction on Northwood Drive may have skewed his data.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 15, 1992
Page 7
Mr. Alan Ackerberg, of 5117 Mirror Lakes Drive, appeared before
the Committee to address what he considers to be a speed problem
on Mirror Lakes Drive. It was his perception that only 40 -50
percent of the motorists follow the speed limit. He suggested
that the installation of "STOP" signs at Northwood Drive, and also
possibly Ayrshire Boulevard, would help alleviate speeding. Mr.
Ackerberg questioned what had happened when this issue had come
before the Committee previously. Mr. Hoffman answered that it had
been a speed issue that time as well, in which residents believed
their own neighbors were the violators. He said they had handled
the situation in a unique way, by handing out pamphlets advising
residents that they themselves were responsible for their speed
problem.
Mr. Ackerberg asked how the speed on Mirror Lakes Drive compared
with speeds in other areas that had been surveyed, and Mr. Hoffman
reported that the speed surveys show an average pattern. Mr.
Kleven noted that there were no serious accident problems on
Mirror Lakes Drive, although there had previously been a problem
at the intersection with Interlachen Boulevard. He indicated a
perception exists that speeds are high on Mirror Lakes Drive, but
that such perceptions are not supported by the surveys. He also
stated that safety issues raised by residents in the Chantrey
Road/Ayrshire-Boulevard area are scheduled to be discussed by the
Traffic Safety Committee at its October meeting.
Mrs. Fuhr moved to defer this issue until the October meeting of
the Committee, so that it might be discussed along with the
Chantrey Road /Ayrshire Boulevard concerns. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Hughes. Motion carried 3 -0.
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
l
o e '
V /
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City council
From: Francis Hoffmary P4
- - -- - - - - -- City Engineer (:
Date: 21 September, 1992
Subject' Garage Construction
at 5621 Wood Lane in
St. Louis Park
Access to Thielen Av(
In Edina
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
° • D
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
.Mgr. Recommends
(❑
To HRA
Q
To Council
Action
7
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Review attached material and comment if so desired.
Info/Background-
The property owners of 5621 Wood Lane, are seeking a variance in St. Louis Park to
construct a new garage on their property. Edina is involved because the new garage access
would be from Thielen Avenue in Edina, not Wood Lane in St. Louis Park as is currently
the case. If the variance was granted in St. Louis Park, the owners at 5621 Wood Lane
would be applying for a curb cut permit from Edina.
The staff has reviewed the issue and would authorize the curb cut subject to the following
conditions:
(A) Property irons be located to ascertain that property abuts public right -of -way.
(B) The curb cut be on the east portion of the north end of Thielen so that snow
storage can continue on the west side of Thielen in winter and parking in the
-summer.
(C) Landscaping be maintained or improved to continue neighborhood aesthetics.
The City Council may have no particular action to take other than review the issue unless
Council directs staff not to approve a curb cut.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
5621 Wood Lane
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Zoning Appeals
of St. Louis Park will meet at the City Hall on Thursday,
September 24, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., and will conduct a public
hearing on the application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck
for a variance at 5621 Wood Lane for property described as
follows, to -wit:
The east 50 feet of Lot 8, Rearrangement of Block 4,
Brookside (Abstract), known as 5621 Wood Lane
from the requirements of Sections 14- 108(1) and 14- 128(5) of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a front yard setback
of 15 feet on a double frontage lot instead of the required 35
feet for property located in the R -1, Single Family Residence
District.
Auxiliary Aides for handicapped persons are available upon
request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel
Office at 924 -2520 to make arrangements. .
If you have questions, contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 924 -2575.
BEVERLY FLANAGAN
CITY CLERK
Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: September 91 1992
—
a
lO i0 _ 30 ! i
(3
t
.
i
I
i
1
I
i
Hou SE
W
'i
0
4DT Fl *:u-.
I
�1
Z
14. o
0 CL v Ew i►Y
fb
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works
FROM: Kris Aaker
DATE: September 9, 1992
SUBJECT: Variance Application for 5621 Woodlane, St. Louis Park
Attached is a notice of public hearing for variance and
corresponding site plan submitted upon request to the Planning
Department for property located at 5621 Woodlane in St. Louis Park.
A 20 foot setback variance is being requested to allow an
24'X 241(576 sq. ft.) detached garage to be located 15 feet from
the south property boundary. The home owners are proposing to
access the garage via a new driveway from Thielen Avenue in Edina.
It would appear that access from Thielen requires review and
comment of the city's Engineering Department. Please review and
comment on the attached application.
From a planning perspective there are a number of issues that may
be raised regarding the plan including:
1. Was consideration given to replacing the existing garage
with a 24' X 24' (576 sq. ft.) garage to be accessed from
Woodlane?
2. Will the existing garage be removed or remain if the
submitted plan is approved.
3. Regarding the current plan, it would be recommended that
the driveway conform to Ordinance #1045 which pertains to
the storage of vehicles within the R -1 zoning district.
The ordinance states that automobiles; motorcycles; or
trucks; pickups or vans under 9, 000 lbs. may be stored on
a driveway not within 15 feet of.the curb. compliance
with this ordinance would require that no parking take
place on the new driveway.
4. Staff would recommend that the new driveway be narrower
where it meets the street to reduce impact.
5. Staff would recommend any approval of the submitted plan
include a requirement to landscape the south property
boundary to reduce impact.
PETITION TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR:
5621 WOOD LANE.
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the city,council to
not approve the applied variance at 5621 Wood Lane.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
OWNER'S NAME_
(PRINTED)
T►'�ua CU . Ne.�5or.1
in !V. f �' EL-r z F
D40 rPF A/ IA)C:
rba L .
Z-VoIE ,W f Aj
PROPERTY ADDRESS
OWNER'S
L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t��
PHONE
6,? 2tk�
q,3S -93o 6
4 ;�Z L -rh ide vL q 2-5 . SZ60
A 3 y/ -7'14 «/ r- ti 11;�y- nW
q -.57-5 r�.i -, 1,,;? u
day -os�y
CLO1a Ru6 113 C
-�J- RAJ67' f1o1M,,
�ef <� - elP1.isk
iG�'i �rZ J
19? 9 9 6 7 �,,
143,76 Th1 /ELE -N &e
Sao - 5g:Z/
L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t��
ga6c(� s�
3Y; 7�7�it•:.i d1��f
9zY ` 7 76 !
.y375-
1AIVA:niyrA�
�a2_17 ?11!)i
113;c--l- i 24� GltiY
V -176
�aGS� % / L xlAjlr--
9ZZ- 37ZS
CLO1a Ru6 113 C
-�J- RAJ67' f1o1M,,
�ef <� - elP1.isk
iG�'i �rZ J
19? 9 9 6 7 �,,
143,76 Th1 /ELE -N &e
Sao - 5g:Z/
L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t��
ga6c(� s�
�`'�IZII�L��I
�'
.y375-
NOTICE OF HEARING." ON
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
5621 Wood Lane
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Zoning Appeals
of St. Louis Park will meet at the City Hall on Thursday,
September 24, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., and will conduct a public
hearing on the application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck
for a.variance at 5621 Wood Lane for property-described as
follows, to -wit:
The east 50 feet of Lot 8, Rearrangement of Block 4,
Brookside (Abstract), known as 5621 Wood Lane
from the requirements of Sections 14- 108(1) and 14- 128(5) of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a front yard setback
of 15 feet on a double frontage lot instead of the required-35
feet for property located in the R- 1,'Single Family Residence
District.
Auxiliary Aides for handicapped persons are available upon
request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel
Office at 924 -2520 to make arrangements.
If you have questions; contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 924 -2575.
BEVERLY FLANAGAN
CITY CLERK
Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: September 9, 1992
TO : CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS & CITY OF
EDINA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FROM : TIM & KRISTY EGAN, 4369 THIELEN, EDINA, MN.
DATE : September 16,1992
REASON: Rebuttal to the application for variance of 5621 Wood Lane:
It is our understanding that items 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 & IS of
the St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance must be satisfied in order for
a variance to be granted. Attached are the seven conditions set
forth by St. Louis Park plus the applicants response to those
conditions. Since, we live within 350 feet of the proposed variance
we have taken the liberty to put our opinions in writing. They are
the opinions of how our neighbors feel.
12) The only thing exceptional or unusual about 5621 Wood Lane is
the fact that it has two front yards. It appears typical, with a 50
foot front and a 140 foot depth. If the property were "typical ",
the applicants would be applying for a variance to build a garage
in their "back yard" with access from Wood Lane. We have no problem
with such a proposal if the existing landscape on Thielen were left
alone. We find it difficult to see where the applicants suffer
"undue hardship ". In the applicants response they admit that it
wasn't until last year they recognized that access from Thielen was
even a option. They bought a home seven years ago with a single car
garage and the hope of building a double garage in the future. They
did not buy the house with they idea they would build a garage with
access from Thielen. All homes on Thielen have the required 35 foot
setback to their homes and garages. Street parking for north end of
Thielen residents will be difficult because of an east side fire
hydrant.
13) Granted, 5621 Wood Lane is peculiar with its two front yards,
but we can't see why Thielen needs to become an alley for their
garage.
14) It is not necessary to open up Thielen for the applicants to
preserve the enjoyment of their lot. You can't miss something you
didn't have.
15) Future use of the proposed variance is a major concern of all
Thielen residents. Currently there are fourteen children under the
age of twelve on the block. Who is to say what the future owners of
5621 Wood Lane would be like. We currently have cars who do not
notice the Dead End sign as they enter Thielen, even though it is
pretty obvious. Most of these confused drivers turn around at one
of the three driveways at the end of our street. Opening up the end
of the street will increase our confused drivers. Plus many of them
may drive faster once the reflectors are taken down. Any additional
traffic is unwarranted and dangerous. From the proposed plan it
appears that the applicants will need to back into a Thielen
driveway in order to turn around, which could prove hazardous.
16) The proposed variance will change the character of Thielen Ave.
All the Thielen residents we have talked to felt they bought homes
on a Dead End. Putting a garage 15 feet from the street is hardly
in character with our block. The closest garage on Thielen complies
with the 35 foot setback from the street. There is no question
approval of this variance will negatively impact the value of our
homes. We have had a chance to review the applicants proposal which
includes only a rough footprint of the site. Nowhere do the
applicants include a accurate site plan and survey, an elevation of
the proposed garage, or a list of construction materials. We are
concerned that the absence of such information may inaccurately
reflect the true aesthetic nature of the structure. We are not
assured that the garages will be in keeping with the character of
the homes on Thielen.
17) We are not sure what being "contrary to the intent of the
ordinance and comprehensive plan" means. So we can't respond to
this section.
18) There is no hardship in the applicants present scenario. They
bought a home with a single car garage. They want to build a new
two car garage. That's fine as long as it doesn't require access
from Thielen. The applicants intent is a convenience and economic
request. There is no hardship.
Metro 2015
Two Scenarios of the
Twin Cities Area in 2015
it
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 291 -6359 TDD 291 -0904
Publication No. 640 -92 -077
July 7, 1992
Printed on Recycled Paper
Introduction-
These scenarios are pictures of what the
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area could be like
in the year 2015. They were sketched by
two members of the Metropolitan Council's
planning staff, Michael Munson and Hal
Freshley, as part of the Council's "Metro
2015" project.
The Council embarked on Metro 2015 to
shape a consensus in the metropolitan
community on 25 -year goals in six areas
considered crucial to the region's future
success - -the economy, governance,
transportation, telecommunications,
education and quality of life. Later this year,
the Council will begin working on strategies
to carry out the goals.
The scenarios grow out of the planners'
personal views and informed speculation
about the future. They do not necessarily
reflect the Council's vision of the region in
the years ahead; that is described in the
Council's discussion paper Metro 2015: Vision
and Goals. The scenarios are nonetheless
useful; they can offer insights that are
sometimes the most compelling because they
come from a personal perspective. Munson's
scenario draws on the categories the Council
has identified as being major factors in
shaping the region's future. Freshley uses
somewhat more general categories: the
regional economy, work life, community life
and personal life. Munson writes his
scenario as if looking ahead from the present
(for example, "...most of the already
developed region will not look a, whole lot
different "). Freshley writes his as if the year
2015 has already arrived (for example, "Of
the region's historically strong businesses,
food processing and biomedical technology
have continued into this century.").
rY• )-
Scenarios can be useful in talking about the
future, not because planners can predict it,
but because such pictures can help a
community decide what kind of a future it
wants. Spinning a scenario suggests to
people that the future just doesn't happen,
that people have power to shape it. The
Metro Council hopes the scenarios will help
stimulating thinking about the region's
future.
Big Changes, Small Changes
by Michael Munson
If I were deciding where to go for a vacation,
I might want a fairly detailed and graphic
description of the alternatives. Or I might
prefer to be surprised. If I really hate the
place, I can always leave and go someplace
else.
If we thought about the future in the same
way, we would probably want to reduce the
element of surprise--given all the bad things
that can happen to people or the societies they
form. Although we can't predict the future
very well, we can at least set forth goals about
what we would like to see happen and work
toward achie► -ing them. One way to do this in
a more tangible or compelling way is with
scenarios -- creating a more graphic vision of
the possible future.
My scenario is not intended to be either
positive or negative- -but thought provoking, or
perhaps just plain provoking. It does not try
to give a comprehensive picture, but just a few
specific glimpses of one person's speculation
about the ftttttre in each of the Council's six
goal areas. To make them more tangible and
compelling, they are written with more "wills"
than "coulds " - -as if the author had liule doubt
about them coining to pass. But considering
I've been making demographic forecasts for
nearly three decades, there is only one thing I
am certain of about the future - -that is we
cannot predict it.
The purpose of providing a scenario is to help
people devise plans that will enable them to
reach the goals embedded in their vision of
the future. The question facing the people of
the Twin Cities Area is: Can we agree on what
we want the future to be, and then figure out
how to make it occur? It's a question worth
considering, because, unlike a vacation
destination, we cannot pack up and leave a
future we don't like.
2
The Look of the Region
The most basic element of a vision for the
region is what it will look like in the future.
Assuming we can't afford to abandon or
replace most of what's already been built,
most of the already developed region will not
look a whole lot different. There may be
some very visible and important exceptions,
but if placed on a map, these would occupy a
very small share of the region's area.
Where the look of the region will change
most is in areas converted from vacant or
low- intensity uses to urban (mostly
residcntia1)_uses. These new areas will,
however, look a lot like the adjacent
developed areas -- varying mostly with regional
prosperity. If the region becomes poorer,
brick facades will be replaced by aluminum
siding on smaller and fewer new homes that
are built. The proportion of new housing
that is apartment buildings will also increase.
If the region prospers, new homes will be
bigger and there will be more of them (and
they'll still have brick facades).
The most important fact is that, unless we
become another Dallas or Phoenix or
Atlanta - -the earth tilts on its axis and we
become part of the Sun Belt, there is going
to be less development change in the next 25
years than there was in the previous 25.
That is because the large "baby- boom"
generation has already entered the housing
market, and now the housing market must
depend on the much smaller baby -bust
generation for its growth.
In addition, we have presently overbuilt
retail and commercial development to such
an extent that some of the next 25 years will
be spent just using what's on the ground.
This will initially limit the ability of the
region's few new freeways to attract major
new commercial developments within this
time frame.
Although numbers do not create a very
tangible vision in most people's minds, they
are often the quickest and most
unambiguous way to describe a situation.
This is the case with respect to regional
growth. In 1965, the region had just under
500,000 housing units (homes and. apartment
units). The next 25 years saw an enormous
increase, about 425,000 new units added.
From 1990 until 2015, the Council's recent
and fairly optimistic forecasts anticipate
about 290,000 new housing units being
constructed. That number is a sizeable gain
but substantially less than in the previous 25
years. Furthermore, this growth is being
added to a region that is almost twice as
large as it was in 1965. This lesser growth
amount will thus be mostly distributed in a
much larger ring surrounding the current
developed area.
These new homes and the related
commercial and industrial development will
fit comfortably within the existing developing
suburbs -- established suburbs such as
Brooklyn Park, Eden Prairie, Eagan, and
Woodbury, and emerging suburbs such as
Andover, Chanhassen and Lakeville.
The Regional Economy
The fate of the region's economy is critical
to virtually every aspect of a future scenario,
and it is one of the most difficult to forecast.
Nevertheless, the Twin Cities economy has
remained relatively stable in its relationship
to the U.S. economy for decades. If there
are no major economic shifts nationally,
there is no good reason to expect the
region's economic health to change much.
Our geographic isolation is diminishing as
telecommunications supplants transportation
as the critical access factor in the emerging
Information Age. Despite long - standing
concerns about the business climate, the
Twin Cities' diverse economy should help us
maintain our economic strength. But the
Twin Cities Area will need to maintain both
a real and perceived high quality of life in
order to offset our climatic liabilities.
Equally important will be the region's ability
to function effectively in a global economy.
I believe the region will be able to achieve
these goals. Building strong economic ties
with Japan will be one of the ways we will
enhance our global competitiveness.
Significant changes economically, either up
or down, would so alter the course of events
that the Metro Council would need to start
over in its "visioning" process. Prosperity
might cause us to just sit back and enjoy the
"surprises" brought by the future, or it could
give us the ability to solve problems we've
only been able to give futile lip - service to in
the past. The prospects of economic
collapse raise such horrifying visions of social
turmoil and rampant demagoguery that I
don't want to think about it.
The lackluster economic trends of the past
two decades will continue through 2015 with
the usual ups and downs, but the middle
class (still the majority of the population)
will have adjusted to it. In fact, many will
stop fretting over their failure to
continuously increase their very comfortable
standard of living, and work to find ways of
equitably sharing the economic wealth of the
nation with an underclass everyone agrees
has grown much too large.
The result will be a stronger economy,
improvements in everybody's economic status
and a significant diminution of the current
social problems -- crime, drugs, family
disintegration, etc. The Twin Cities Area
and the state will lead the nation, by
example, in bringing this change about.
Another future economic outcome to look
for is the impact of the continuing changes
in the production and marketing of consumer
goods - -that is, retailing. What will people
want, who'll be making it and how will it be
sold? Advances in telecommunications,
narrower marketing, just -in -time inventorying
and increasing desires for convenience will
result in a return to a smaller scale of
retailing at a neighborhood scale. Clothing
can be ordered through an electronic catalog
that contains a customer's three - dimensional
image. The computer will select styles that
will fit and flatter the customer -- although
you can, at your peril, override the
computer. These changes will seriously
challenge the major regional centers, which
will have to find more ways than just
shopping to attract customers. Their success
will depend on tapping people's needs to
come together.
Governance
Governance is an area that will not see much
change in terms of the jurisdictional map of
the Twin Cities Area. Because of our
relatively high tolerance of government, its
relatively high level of performance and lack
of genuine crises, there is not sufficient
impetus to erase the crazy quilt of 19th
century political boundaries.
However, by 2015 the number of cooperative
efforts among jurisdictions and among
different levels of government will have
become so numerous and effective that the
need for restructuring government in a
formal way is not viewed as necessary- -and
that's when it will start to occur.
Transportation
The real impetus for transportation
improvements in the Twin Cities Area won't
come from trumped up fears of gridlock- -
most of us have heard newcomers and
visitors laugh at our complaints about
congestion. Transportation improvements
will stem from our coming to grips with the
fact that the Twin Cities Area is climatically
challenged.
We will continue to shift from a mentality
that responds only reactively to crisis (real or
4
contrived) toward approaches that analyze
things with the simple intent of making them
better. This will result in the
implementation of a range of transportation
design and management improvements - -some
of which are already being used and others
are yet to be conceived.
The most dramatic changes will occur with
transit. The region's first light rail transit
line will directly link a number of major
regional activity centers. This will include
downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul, the
University of Minnesota, the airport (with
contingency plans to extend it to a new
airport), the Megamall, and a regional park
or two.
It will also extend into several suburbs that
were selected because they had the best
proposal for high- density, mixed -use
development and redevelopment with indoor
connections to the new transit line.
Redevelopment is strongly supported along
the entire line. It focuses on the need to
provide fully climate - protected linkages from
high- density housing through retail - service
arcades to the transit stops.
Although the vast majority of people still live
in the suburbs and depend on the auto, the
new climate -proof transit system generates
new growth and redevelopment at a rapid
rate. It is especially popular with aging baby
boomers, and also with the newcomers to the
region from places with much higher
development densities (and less rigorous
climates). More lines are planned based on
demonstrable evidence that transit, done
right, can shape development and, in doing
so, increase its share of ridership.
Telecommunications
The Council (and probably similar bodies in
every other major metro area) has come to
realize that telecommunications will
increasingly be as critical as transportation
systems were in the past in determining a
metro area's place in the hierarchy of U.S.
and world metro areas. Telecommunications
will also play an increasing role in shaping
future urban development.
The most important telecommunications
advance will be the proliferation of the
portable, flat - screened, multipurpose
communication and computing device. By
2015 it will have begun to radically change
the workplace, educational institutions and
homes. This device, will serve as a computer,
videophone, television, library, book, FAX,
optical scanner and probably a few functions
that don't yet exist. This will be possible
because of the continued advances in
miniaturization and the development .of a
superb- quality video display.
Conventional means of communications will
begin to change. Voice commands will
largely replace key strokes. Books, reports,
letters, etc., will be composed of
combinations of conventional written text,
spoken words or music and video. Key -word
search capabilities will give people quick and
effective access to incredible amounts of
information. Books will become treasured
collector's items; the paperless society will be
well under way. The impact on the
workplace and schools are not hard to
visualize, but 'there is potential for
fundamental change in social interaction and
interpersonal communication.
Education
By 2015, the routinized and regimented
structures imposed on people's lives as a
result of the Industrial'Revolution will have
been significantly eroded. One major area of
change will be in the educational system.
The highly structured system of grade levels
and daily class schedules will be replaced
with ones more suited to the brightest and
most creative creature on the planet.
We should also see significant inroads of this
softening of structures in the workplace, as
huge numbers of independent, middle -aged
baby boomers demand greater autonomy.
Many people, especially those in positions of
power, will resist these forces, feeling that
society will collapse without the structures of
the past. But future generations will come
to realize that focusing on important
outcomes -- knowledge, wisdom, self- support,
social responsibility and joy - -do not require
such rigid structuring.
The distinctions between learning, work and
play will become increasingly blurred. With
portable flat- screen technology, education
can and will take place more at home and on
the job. Education and work will become
more integrated, beginning at an earlier age,
with more of it occurring in the home.
These education, workplace and
telecommunications changes will tend to
separate people. Strong countermeasures
will be enacted, by an overwhelming
consensus, to ensure that people do not
become isolated and detached from society.
Quality of Life
Quality of life can be defined to cover
practically any aspect of human life. One
current concern is the decline of married -
couple families. An immediate outcome of
this trend is the negative impact on the
economic status of growing numbers of
children. The long -term effects are also
coming to be viewed with increasing alarm,
as the disadvantages of being raised in
poverty, with only one parent, are seen as
reducing a person's chances for future
economic and social success.
However, as with many trends that have
been going on for some time, we finally
realize what's happening and start to act
when the trends have peaked and either
level off or reverse. We seldom anticipate
these reversals coming, but only project their
continuation to disastrous outcomes. I would
not dare to predict that we are at such a
point now or in any way want to encourage
complacency. But I would not be surprised
if this turns out to be the case well before
2015, and well before society unravels
completely.
How quality of life relates to income, and
more specifically income disparities, is fairly
obvious. Another, less direct relationship is
between quality of life and cultural diversity.
Income disparities also affect -this
relationship. The conflict between those
that want to be exposed to cultural diversity
and those that dop't has become an issue of
growing concern. The issue might be cast in
terms of socioeconomic status, age or race.
It is hardly a new phenomenon. In fact, it is
an issue primarily because growing numbers
of people reject separation. And many of
those who make decisions that keep them
separate (primarily through residential
location) do so without being very open and
direct about the motives behind their
choices.
There is also considerable focus today on the
growing gap between the haves and the
have -nots. The issues of cultural diversity
and economic disparity come together
because certain cultural groups in the U.S.,
particularly racial and ethnic minorities, have
not shared equally in the wealth of our
society.
This will be important in the Twin Cities
Area's future because the region is going to
be much more culturally diverse in the
future, particularly in terms of race. The
minority populations in the region are much
younger and have higher fertility rates. This
is especially true of Southeast Asians, whose
numbers are likely to continue to grow very
rapidly due to natural increase (births over
deaths). We should not be surprised if the
region is home to 200,000 or:more Asian -
Americans by 2015.
Natural increase will also be high in the
African- American population. More
significant, however, is the potential for
massive inmigration. There are currently
about 90,000 African- Americans in the
region. There are about one and a half
0
million in Chicago and about that same
number in Milwaukee, Detroit and St. Louis
combined. There has been significant
inmigration in the past decade, about a
23,000 net gain. This is half the White net
migration gain. This is a remarkably high
proportion, considering that African -
Americans make up less than five percent of
the population.
Most of these people have come here for
social and economic opportunity. If they are
able to realize these opportunities, it is likely
that the connections they have in the areas .
they came from, where conditions are worse,
will result in increasing migration to the
Twin Cities Area. We should not be
surprised if the region is home to 350,000 to
400,000 African- Americans in 2015. Perhaps
some of these migrants will be refugees from
Third World countries, as the Twin Cities
African- American community opens its arms
to people in need, not unlike the region's
acceptance of Southeast Asian refugees in
the 1970s and 1980s.
One issue this increased minority growth
raises is: Will there be large enough numbers
of Whites who want to live in racially mixed
city neighborhoods to maintain racial balance
in the central cities? The equally important
flip side of this issue is how many African -
Americans and Asians themselves want to
live in racially mixed areas? Are they as
interested in satisfying regional cultural
diversity goals as in reaching economic
parity?
Another issue related to minority growth is
the impact on regional perceptions of quality
of life. The continued infusion of new
people, who on the average have significantly
lower incomes, will bring down the region's
average, income. This could "hurt" us in
national rankings, one of our favorite
obsessions. But if many people who come
here for opportunity find it, while the rest of
the region's residents are just as well off or
better off than before, how important is this
overall regional average?
After the "Deep Recession"
by Hal Freshley
The Regional Economy
The Twin Cities regional economy has
emerged relatively strong - -at least compared
to the rest of the U.S. - -from the difficult
economic restructuring that followed the
Deep Recession of 1998. Elsewhere in the
U.S., local economies are heavily dependent
on multinational, foreign -owned companies.
However, in the Twin Cities Area most
employers are, in fact, local businesses.
Locally owned businesses and industries have
been relatively successful in finding unique
"economic niches" in the global marketplace.
The Twin Cities Area has emerged as a
"business incubator" for a great number of
new small businesses in three expanding
areas of international trade: recycling
technologies (plastics, chemicals, radioactive
materials, hospital and industrial wastes);
small machinery that meets stringent new
international air and noise pollution control
standards; and cold weather technologies.
Of the region's historically strong businesses,
food processing and biomedical technology
have continued into this century. In
addition, recent reports show that Twin
Cities -based businesses now lead the world in
developing and refining cold - climate
applications, specifically for agriculture,
construction engineering, energy and
transportation. The primary markets for
these new "cryo- technologies" are in the
slowly developing United Republics (former
the USSR) and in western Canada.
The local economy includes all the support
industries for these growth areas:
postsecondary education, technical research
and development firms, international
marketing and advertising experts, and the
new Center for International Law at the
University of Minnesota. Other major
growth industries include repair and
7
maintenance services (vehicles, houses,
furniture, appliances and business machines),
and the human equivalent of
repair /maintenance (cosmetology, medicine,
physical activity /recreation and long -term
care).
Compared to the years of the Deep
Recession (1998- 2005), we now have low
unemployment - -and a surge in the volume of
inmigration to the region. The Twin Cities
Area is drawing new residents primarily from
the Great Plains states, from the older Rust
Belt cities of the eastern U.S., and
increasingly from California - -since the series
of earthquakes in 2002 -3.
Work Life
If one were only looking at demographics,
one might have predicted that this would be
an era of retirement. By the end of this
decade (2010 -2020) the number of people in
the Twin Cities who reach age 60 will have
increased by 150,000 persons: the "baby -
boom" generation will be reaching retirement
age. But a combination of events - -the Deep
Recession, which wiped out many private
pensions, the lack of personal savings,
decrease in housing values (loss of equity)
and smaller numbers of "replacement"
younger people in the work force - -all have
created a climate for continued employment
of older persons.
The region's industrial /service mix has also
provided relatively higher - paying jobs than is
true in the rest of the country. Coupled with
the lowest unemployment rate in nearly two
decades (4.1 percent now, compared to a
high of 13.7 percent during the worst of the
Deep Recession), Twin Citians generally
have the feeling that they know what the
future will bring for themselves and their
children. Job discrimination is increasingly
tied to genetic tests: legal suits abound over
this practice. Risk of developing certain
chronic diseases, as well as behavior
characteristics such as "attention deficit," are
now tied to specific human genes.
Many middle -aged people are thankful that
they have jobs at all, despite the
disappointment of losing out on the
retirement years that their parents had.
Private pensions are increasingly tied to
medical problems and disability. Able
bodied, healthy people are not eligible for
benefits. Consequently, more and more
people continue to seek and hold on to at
least part -time employment well into their
60s and 70s. Almost everyone of working
age has had several jobs - -and many
experienced some period of unemployment
in the past. For the majority of Twin Citians
(78 percent) time - limited jobs have become
the norm. Few employers have so- called
"permanent" employees beyond the top
administration, comptrollers and legal staff.
Other employees are hired on an "as needed"
basis, as orders come in or contracts are won.
But with a healthy economy, jobs are
plentiful.
The vast majority of Twin Citians feel very
positive about the improving economy.
However, there were some who were able to
insulate themselves from the worst of the
Recession. Many of the region's wealthiest
persons (about eight percent of the
population) had either no change or
increases in their adjusted annual incomes
during the Deep Recession. Some hardly
knew it happened.
Community Life
For 30 years local communities have tried to
solve their social problems through
regulation, restrictions and redevelopment- -
pushing "undesirable" people on to the next
community. During the Deep Recession- -
with high unemployment, intergroup violence
and property destruction - -this approach
accelerated.
0
As a result of these policies and mutual "self-
sorting," the Metropolitan Area has become
a hodge -podge of small urban
neighborhoods, more and more
homogeneous along cultural, educational and
income lines. Each neighborhood has
developed its own distinct "personality,"
which is reflected in the composition of its
neighborhood- community council. In almost
every neighborhood, there are ,a few very
active citizens who attend most of the
meetings and most vocal and influential in
local decisions. In some communities the
language on the street is not English but
Dakotah, Spanish or Hmong.
Public services are organized to include
combinations of these smaller
neighborhood /community units. For
example, elementary schools are located in
each neighborhood, but high schools serve
combinations of eight to 10 neighborhoods;
local police protection is provided in each
neighborhood, but investigation and
incarceration services are provided for 20 to
25 neighborhoods.
These small communities are linked by a
network of public transit vehicles (some on
fixed guideways, some via highways), and
each community has at least one transit -
transfer hub - -for traveling on to other
communities. Because the places where
people live and the jobs that people have are
almost completely unrelated to each other,
the average amount of time each person
spends commuting (including transfers) is
1.33 hours daily. The private automobile is
still the preferred way of getting around;
however, nearly half of the work force uses
public or private transit regularly.
The Supreme Court has recently ruled that
individuals do not have in an inalienable
right to operate cars that fail to meet air
pollution standards. Alternative -fuel cars
(solar and electric) are beyond the means of
the majority of Twin Citians - -so transit and
carpooling options have expanded. For
those people who operate their own cars,
transportation represents 32 percent of the
family budget.
In the lower- income neighborhoods, people
have adapted to the economic times by
developing a kind of barter economy.
Money doesn't change hands as much as
goods and services are traded. Child care,
household carpentry and plumbing, car repair
and gardening are among the skills that are
in high demand among family members and
neighbors. Mutual identification and mutual
support have provided a great deal of social
cohesion among these groups. Bypassing the
medium of "money" greatly reduced sales tax
revenues in these communities. Region -wide
there is a debate over whether or how the
state can tax these in -kind transactions.
Upper- income neighborhoods are identifiable
by the necessary security precautions, guards
and electronic surveillance. Most of our
region's wealthiest residents live in the Twin
Cities Area at least part of every year, in
"secure communities" (i.e., privately guarded)
in the western and northeastern suburbs.
One of the most controversial issues now
facing federal and state lawmakers is sorting
out which jurisdiction gets tax revenues from
multistate and multinational enterprises.
Telecommunications and commercial
transport systems have made it increasingly
difficult to determine where money is made
and where the economic transactions actually
take place. Declaring primary residence in
one state or another has become quite
complicated.
Lower- and middle- income neighborhoods
have become increasingly "stable " - -with less
yearly residency turnover. The decline in the
regional housing market greatly reduced
housing costs -- especially in the older
neighborhoods - -and increasing numbers of
lower- income people have been able to buy
the cheaper housing.
In contrast, wealthier neighborhoods are
characterized by significant seasonal
0
turnover; incentives for multiple residency,
coupled with more and more business and
pleasure destinations combine to increase the
use of time -share condominium arrangements
and lavish rental units in wealthy
neighborhoods.
About 63 percent of the total voting -age
population voted in the last election, but the
political process is dominated by the older
middle -age population. Political decisions
increasingly favor older people. A large
share of public expenditures go to police and
fire protection. Toll highways link the
region's manufacturers to the national
roadway system. Manufacturing and industry
are largely protected by private security
forces that control access to the plants and
maintain order on the premises.
Personal life
Everywhere the influence of "age
identification" is apparent. In work life, a
major issue for management is seniority.
Younger workers .(the majority of whom do
not identify with a White- European value
system) are increasingly in conflict with the
increasingly staid middle -aged population
(most of whom are White). Despite the
weakness of the union movement in the past
few years, there has been a recent
resurgence of union activity, frequently with
two rival unions within the same industry- -
one representing the views of younger
workers, and one representing older workers.
The median household income (in constant
1990 dollars) fell from $36,678 in 1990 to
$27,750 today. Two (or more) adult incomes
are necessary for households to maintain a
comfortable standard of living. As a result,
there has been a big increase in "co-
housing"- -where several families live in one
building and share some common space- -
especially among people who are nearing
retirement age and very young families.
Nonetheless, the life -style of the average
Twin Citian bears very little resemblance to
the perceived ideal of the. last century. The
average work -week is 38 hours (little
changed over the years), but more of
everyone's time is spent on "family matters."
With the maturing of the work force, the age
of most workers' parents. is in the 80s and
90s. The relatively high cost of chronic care
(due to the shortage of younger workers) has
forced many middle -aged baby boomers to
bring their older parents in to live with them.
For older people who maintain separate
homes, the bulk of caring and personal
support is provided by family and neighbors.
It is beginning to be popular among younger
people to be married; but the majority of
middle -aged households with children are not
wife/husband parents, but single persons and
multigeneration households in cohabiting and
cohousing arrangements.
The school year parallels the work year - -12
months long, but with two -week vacations,
approximately midsummer (around July 4th
is popular), and midwinter (Christmas/New
Year's). The public school has become a
kind of one -stop shopping for child
development. In order to help working
parents, the public schools offer everything
from infant day care to vocational training
and retraining.
The curriculum for grades 1 through 12
focuses on language skills (English and at
least one other language), computation and
science, and physical education/health. The
outcomes that are required for graduation
from each grade also include age - graded
standards for self - discipline and social skills
(self- motivation, study habits, taking
responsibility, etc.) We are still trying to
figure out how to instill tolerance for
"cultural pluralism" in the next generation.
Secondary education provides three optional
10
concentrations: 1) vocational and business
skills, 2) science and math, and 3) arts and
humanities. Upper- division students in all
three areas are required to have a working
knowledge of English, Spanish and one other
language.
Crime statistics show that the major increases
are occurring in white - collar crime:
billing /computer fraud, electronic transfer
hackers, and blackmail extortion via illegal
access to private (personal) files. Since
people often shop and pay bills by FAX,
computer vandalism (e.g., "jamming wires ") is
a threat to reliable commercial activity.
There's fun here, too. Videovision (VV) is
the diversion of choice, and "media junkies"
have video games as well as "Leave It to
Beaver" reruns at their fingertips. Spectator
sports are especially popular -- people have a
fascination with the struggle between the
good guys vs. the bad guys. Outdoor and
indoor recreation attracts middle -aged
people striving to keep fit. Most middle -
class households have their own version of
the "total -body exerciser." These machines
are programmable for any age or fitness
level.
Video - photography is a rapidly growing art
form. Arts events reflect the new ethno-
identity craze that has been sweeping the
country. Hispanic fiestas, German polkafests
and Swedish chorales now vie with
Cambodian dancers, African- American
gospel choirs and American Indian
drum /singers for attention. The new wave of
arts is nontraditional, a hodge -podge of
cultural references -- unlike high -brow arts of
old, which appealed only to a small corps of
intelligentsia. Spiritual and religious
affiliation is also increasing gradually, with
growing interest in meditation and self -
improvement sects.
r
Metro 2015
Vision and Goals
Draft for Discussion
r�
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 291 -6359 TDD 2910904
Publication No. 640- 92 -076B
June 26, 1992
a4
Introduction
This document is part of an effort by the Metropolitan Council to develop a "vision' or picture of
what the Twin Cities Region should be in the year 2015.
Why a Vision?
• In its first 25 years, the Council has looked ahead to plan solutions for important problems
facing the region. Now it is looking ahead to the next 25 years.. What does this region want
to be, to look like and to offer its citizens in 2015? The Council is responsible for making
long -range plans today to help ensure the region's health and vitality in the 21st century.
Setting goals for the region is a first step.
• As the Council begins to update its keystone regional plan, the Metropolitan Development and
Investment Framework, it needs to examine the problems and opportunities the region will
face over the next two decades. The policies in the framework will help guide our growth and
development, but we need to know where we want to be in 2015 - -we need a vision.
• The Council is specifically charged by statute to prepare goals and plans for the orderly and F
economic development of the region. In addition, the Council is being challenged and
encouraged to provide leadership in long -range planning for the region. Creating a vision can
help in that effort.
Cornerstone Ideas
At the beginning of this effort, the Council set a basic assumption in establishing a vision:
To achieve the highest quality living in a community setting with the flexibility to accommodate the
changing population and compete in a world economy. To pursue the region's future with a
sensitivity and respect for our environment in our development and redevelopment practices.
The Council decided, after hearing from several nationally recognized strategic thinkers, that
there are really a handful of forces or factors driving the decisions needed to make this region
successful in the 21st century. Six major factors or categories emerged:
• Economics
• Governance
• Transportation
• Telecommunications
• Education
• Quality of life
Goals as a Starting Point
The goals developed in the six categories describe where we want to be, rather than ways to get
there. At a later stage, it will be necessary to identify strategies to accomplish the goals and the
appropriate actors to implement them. Before that, however, the Council wants to share this
vision with the regional community to see if the goals are on target -- whether these are the right
goals the region should be pursuing. The goals are intended to spark a wide- ranging community
discussion about where this region is going in the next quarter century.
Some kind of measures are needed to determine whether the region is meeting its goals. This
document includes examples of possible measures for each of the six categories of goals. Like the
goals, they are only a starting point for discussion.
The Process
The goals were drafted by small discussion groups made up of Council members, staff and
members of the Council's Minority Issues Advisory Committee. The groups benefitted from ideas
of national and.local experts who spoke to them, including educators, economists, academicians,
planners, representatives of the telecommunications industry and others.
Over the next two months, the Council will be asking for ideas and comments on these goals.
Many organizations and individuals- will be participating. The Council is making a special effort to
discuss the goals with some of the young people who will be adults when the year 2015 arrives.
The Council will then revise the goals based on what it heard in the public dialogue. After a set
of goals is adopted by the Council, the Council will move forward to develop strategies to
accomplish the vision.
2
,
A Vision
It's now the year 2015. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area has achieved the goals proposed by
the Metro Council a quarter century ago. What kind of a region do we live in?
Key Themes
We've become more adaptive and proactive in shaping change. We have found that in the school
of change, the lesson is never over. We have developed our economy, our educational system
and our governmental functions to meet changing demands and expectations.
We've sought technological advances that are crucial to the region's economy and quality of life.
We used technology as a tool to achieve our goals- -for example, in transportation,
telecommunications, education and business.
We've opened the doors wider to opportunities and resources. All residents have better access to
jobs, governmental decision - making, education, recreational opportunities, health care, housing
and information resources.
We've gained spin -off benefits from the decisions we've made. For example, our
telecommunication system has bolstered the economy while giving telecommuters an alternative to
traffic congestion and enriching learning opportunities. Our education system has equipped
students with basic academic, social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as
citizens, workers and parents. And it has helped young people shape their hopes and potential.
We have successfully resolved important but competing priorities. For example, we have grown
economically, but we have preserved and improved our natural environment. We have a larger
population that is more diverse, but we have strengthened our sense of community. Government
has finally learned to do more with less.
A Closer Look
Looking more closely, we see a region that is a strong, well- established player in the global
marketplace. We realized many years ago that metropolitan areas, not nations, would be the key
economic competitors in the international playing field.
We realized we had to be more organized in the way we bolstered the region's economy. Our
young people are achieving their full potential in school; our regional quality of life has attracted
talented people and dollar investments; and we've adequately invested in our essential
infrastructure to support economic activity and the basic needs of our urban society.. The result
has been an improved regional standard of living, supported by substantial job growth and a
diverse economy. Greater Minnesota has prospered from spin -off companies and jobs located in
the region:
Communities in the region have willingly cooperated in seeking business, jobs and revenues based
on regional interests rather than the interests of individual communities. This cooperation
enables the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets.
3
We've made the region a leader in the use of technological advances in transportation and
telecommunications, which support both our economy.and quality of life. Our
telecommunications system uses leading -edge technology to link our voices, video images and data
with destinations within the region, and around the state, nation and the globe.
Telecommunications is now considered as essential an infrastructure as transportation, sewers and
education.
The region leads in using technological advances in transportation like "intelligent" vehicle and
highway systems. At the same time, we've made better use of the facilities we have by managing
travel demand and charging users a variety of transportation "prices," like congestion fees and
parking surcharges. Our transit system, now very consumer- oriented, has more passengers each
year. Our major.airport is an international hub, with direct flights to cities around the country
and the world.
Government at all levels has become more innovative and cost- efficient in delivering services and
solving problems. Government roles are clearly defined so that services are delivered at the most
effective and efficient level. People have responded with renewed interest in governmental affairs
and higher voting rates show it. People feel a stronger sense of belonging to their communities
within the region, and they participate and feel comfortable in their community. At the same
time, people feel that they belong to one metropolitan region.. They think about and work for z
the Metro Area.
We still have a strong environmental awareness. But we think less now about mitigating negative
effects on the environment, and more about designing urban development and its support
facilities with nature and people in mind. Our air and water are cleaner; our waste is less toxic
and we're producing less of it per capita. We can swim and fish in our three major rivers and in
our lakes that have the greatest potential for recreation or water supply.
The region has an abundance of accessible recreation, cultural and information opportunities.
Health care is accessible to everyone who needs it, but most people take responsibility for
pursuing a healthful lifestyle. Families of all types get the support they need to care for their
family members, including children and elderly. The percentage of all residents living in poverty
has declined
Housing is affordable for more of the region's residents, and it is designed to suit people at
various stages of their lives and people with special needs. More employment opportunities are
located near affordable housing and more affordable housing near new jobs. Our aging
neighborhoods have been rehabilitated and a sense of community strengthened there. Our streets
are safer and crime rates lower.
We've planned the region's growth into a pattern that has reduced traffic congestion, the cost of
public services, energy consumption, air pollution, and more of the negative effects on the
environment. Urban design concepts have helped create a sense of place, with open spaces,
natural features, public buildings and transportation facilities.
We have come a long way in 25 years. We're already looking ahead to the next quarter century.
4
Goals
The Regional Economy
For many years the region has been a good place to live, work and establish businesses. Its
economy has experienced steady employment growth of 2.7 percent annually and relatively low
unemployment rates (4.5 percent in 1991) - -well below Minnesota and U.S. rates of 5.1 percent
and 6.7 percent, respectively. Manufacturing industries gained some jobs, while service industries
gained the most. The region is home to 15 firms on the Fortune 500 list of industrial firms. Its
poverty rate (8.1 percent) is well below the national average (13.1 percent). In per capita
personal income; the region ranked sixth among the 25 largest metro areas in 1989 (8 percent
higher than the average of the 25 metro areas and 15 percent higher than the U.S. average).
This success has largely been credited to the region's skilled labor force and to our diverse
economy. But in recent years a number of clouds have appeared on the economic horizon.
There are questions about how well we are educating our labor force; the computer industry in
the region is in decline; some major businesses are no longer under family or local control; the
Minnesota business climate has been soundly criticized by the private sector; global competition is
increasing and world markets are changing. In addition, there are concerns about the problem of
low income burdening a significant number of people, inadequate productivity growth, our ability ,
to maintain competitive advantages in computers and medical equipment, and the demand for
government services versus the willingness to pay for those services.
Looking to the year 2015 raises a major question: Is the region prepared to compete and thrive in
this changing environment? For example, no longer is the region's business competition the other
cities in the U.S.; it is other cities around the world. Can we afford to sit back and let "the
market" respond to these and other changes, or are there some roles government can or should
play to keep this region competitive in the emerging world markets? What roles should the
business community play? Are there opportunities for public /private cooperation? Before these
questions can be answered, it is important to have a vision of what we want the regional economy
to look like. Below are goals that can help shape that vision for the 2015 economy.
Goals
1. The region is recognized as a major player in the global economy, based on the following:
The region has a highly educated workforce with skills important to the. regional economy,
and with the ability to learn new skills as the economy changes in response to the national
and international economies. These would include a wide range of skills- -for example, in
design and manufacturing as well as in management and finance.
The region has a quality of life that attracts and keeps both businesses and a highly skilled
and adaptable workforce.
Infrastructure developed by regional and local governments and by the private sector supports
regional economic activity and encourages job growth that meets the needs of the population.
Infrastructure financing - -using cooperative arrangements, where possible -- reflects the full costs
of facilities through their life cycle -- including costs of capital, operation, maintenance and
replacement.
5
2. The region's economy experiences steady growth in the gross regional product per capita
(increasing the regional standard of living), based on the following:
Job growth provides employment at liveable wages for all residents, raising low and middle per
capita income levels.
The region's economy is diverse and flexible in terms of using regional strengths and resources
(labor market, investment capital, infrastructure, natural resources, etc.) to adapt to changing
regional and world markets and to attract and retain industries serving those markets.
3. Communities in the region are more willing to cooperate in seeking business, jobs and
revenues based on regional interests rather than on the interests of individual communities.
Such cooperation -- assisted by a more equitable tax structure, a more equitable provision of
needed services and more appropriate use of public investments in private undertakings- -helps
enable the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets.
4. The region has more corporate headquarters of large public and private firms.
Banks, insurance companies, venture capital companies and other sources of investment
capital in the region provide adequate funds to invest in start -up and expansion of local firms
and to nurture entrepreneurial efforts.
5. The tax burden of the region's residents and businesses ranks lower than in 1992 as compared
to other metropolitan areas.
Examples of Possible Measures
Unemployment rate compared to other urban areas
Per capita personal income in region compared to other urban areas (per capita gross regional
product compared to other urban areas)
Percent of population below the poverty level compared to other urban areas (percent of
population above 150 percent of poverty rate)
Employment growth rate compared with previous years and comparable regions (employment
growth rate in specific industries)
Mix of industries in region compared to mix in the nation (diversity)
Composite measures of tax burden on individuals (rankings) and on businesses (rankings)
6
Governance
Government in the early 1990s has fallen on hard times. Regional and local government has
experienced declining federal support; political leadership has been criticized or challenged; and
many citizens feel a strong disaffection from government, becoming active mainly when their self -
interest is threatened.
The challenge to government is to bring new people into the process both as participants and in
leadership positions, particularly minorities and women whose participation in the past had been
limited; to develop a renewed sense of confidence in government's ability to solve problems by
allowing decision - making at the neighborhood or community levels where innovation and
flexibility can be encouraged; to act decisively and in the broader regional interest at the regional
level for those problems that need a central focus. A renewed emphasis on governance -- acting
collectively to solve problems - -is essential.
People and governmental units need to think of themselves as being part of one region. The
region cannot be a collection of cities all competing against one another. The region now
competes with the world.
In governance, there is often a need to balance competing priorities- -for example, the desire for-,
government to be "close to the people," on one hand, and, on the other, expectations for
government services to be efficient and economical, often requiring centralization. The Metro
Council also has a vision for its own role in governance. It includes strong leadership on regional
issues, bolstered by additional authority to decide how state funds are spent in the Metropolitan
Area for public infrastructure and to determine where and when public subsidies will be used for
facilities of region -wide importance.
Goals
1. All segments of the public have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their lives
and the future of their communities. Citizen decision - making takes place at the neighborhood
and community level, whenever possible. Citizen decision - making is also fostered in our larger
governmental units.
2. People have confidence in their elected and appointed government officials. The region has a
high level of political participation (such as voting and the number of persons running for
office). Participants and leaders are more representative of the diversity of the region.
3. Government roles and responsibilities are appropriately and clearly defined, including roles
involving education, so that regional and local policymaking and service delivery occur at the
most effective and efficient level, and gaps in services are closed.
4. Governmental units achieve the results people want by redesigning the service delivery system
and using other innovative approaches, public or private, to deliver public services.
5. The Metropolitan Council is the region's leader for policy planning, which provides direction,
integration and coordination of regional services. The Council decides how federal and state
funds allocated to the Metropolitan Area for public infrastructure will be spent. It decides on
major direct and indirect public investments that support facilities of region -wide importance
located within the Metropolitan Area.
7
Examples of Possible Measures
Opinion poll measures on people's confidence in local government
Voter participation rates
Number of service redesign projects completed
Level of Metro Council participation in public decisions regarding facilities of region -wide
importance sited in the region
�4
J
Transportation
The transportation problems the region faces today and in the future stem from our need and
desire for personal mobility. Our life style involves pursuing many activities in many locations.
And to meet those needs, the automobile -- specifically the automobile with a sole occupant- -has
been the mode of choice for the vast majority of people.
However, using our cars as vehicles to carry just one person has been a major factor in causing
our transportation problems. For example, it is primarily responsible for the growing problem of
congestion during peak travel periods. Between 1972 and 1984, the number of severely congested
- -freeway - miles -rose from 24 -to 72- miles. — That- total could increase to-200 miles -by the year 2010,
according to estimates of the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation.
With many cars having only a solo driver, our extensive highway system has not been used
efficiently. For example, during peak periods, average auto occupancy dropped nine percent
between 1980 and 1990. At the same time, people have been traveling more. On an average
weekday, the number of trips taken per person rose by a third between 1970 and 1990.
Heavy use of the single - occupant auto is also a major factor in causing the negative environmental
effects caused by the building and operation of our transportation system. It is an expensive wayi
to move people. And it has promoted a spread -out land use pattern that makes it difficult to
serve many parts of our region with economical transit service.
Ridesharing and transit use, on the other hand, can increase the efficiency of the transportation
system. But bus ridership declined 24 percent from 1980 to 1990. The challenge facing the
region is to make these modes more attractive while making use of single - occupant vehicles less
attractive and convenient.
Airport capacity is another major issue. The region risks forgoing substantial economic gains if
adequate airport capacity is not available as needed in a timely fashion over the next 25 years.
Goals
1. The transportation system moves people and goods within the region and to the state, nation
and world efficiently and cost - effectively. The transportation system is developed in ways that
preserve the integrity of the environment, allow for economic growth and development, and
support other regional goals. The system also reflects the region's leadership in the use of
advanced transportation technology (for example, "intelligent" vehicle and highway systems,
high -speed rail, hover craft) that maximizes the system's capacity and efficiency.
2. The regional transportation system balances demand and capacity so that resources are used
most efficiently and the environment is least affected. This is achieved by managing how
existing facilities are used- -for example by reducing use of single- occupant vehicles, changing
the tinge that people make trips, reducing the frequency of trips and changing trip
destinations. The system also balances local, state and national mobility needs.
3. Transit is the preferred choice over the single - occupant automobile for many more people.
An adequately funded and improved transit system makes regular -route transit, paratransit
and ridesharing more attractive for all users. With improved safety, comfort and convenience
of riders and drivers, the transit system increases the people- carrying capacity of the
transportation system as much as possible, serves the needs of transit - dependent people,
supplements the metropolitan highway system, maintains and enhances the economic vitality
of the central cities and allows for intensified development in other economic centers.
Land development and redevelopment create an, environment that promotes and encourages
increased use of all forms of transit.
4. The efficiency of the transportation system is improved, and use of the system reflects the
environmental, social and financial costs to society. For example, the region is a national
leader in using a variety of transportation pricing, including . "congestion pricing," "peak - period
pricing," parking surcharges and single- occupant vehicle taxes.
5. The region has an air transportation system with the capability to meet the demand from
.businesses and people in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest for air connections to the nation
and the world.
The region's major airport enjoys the presence of "home base" commercial airline facilities,
international hubbing and a competitive airline market, with a the sizable presence of several
national commercial airlines. Direct passenger and air freight services are available to the
world's major cities.
The region's major airport, and its satellite airports, provide convenient and safe air travel,
and cause the least amount of disruption to the environment.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Miles of congested freeways
Vehicle occupancy
Transit ridership
Air quality measures
Application of "intelligent" vehicle technology in transit service
Airline takeoffs and landings
Number of international airline flights from Twin Cities Area
Number of nonstop airline flights
10
Telecommunications
Telecommunications - -and access to it - -will become increasingly vital to the fundamental economic
health of the Twin Cities Region in the years ahead. That's a lesson history can teach us.
This region grew to national economic prominence because the railroads, then the highways, then
today's jet airplanes gave the region's businesses good connections to the national market. These
facilities gave the region a way to overcome its remote inland location to sell and ship its ideas
and products to the nation, and more recently, to the world. Now, telecommunications is
increasingly being viewed as the next key infrastructure, as important to the region as the
railroads and highways were in the region's economic history. The region's businesses need the
same access --or better - -to advanced telecommunications as businesses in other regions enjoy in
order to compete in a world marketplace.
In addition, the region needs modern, high - capacity telecommunications services because people
need access to information and because telecommunications offers seemingly boundless
opportunities for people to learn, earn a living and enjoy a higher quality of life. Unequal
opportunities, experts argue, will lead to a society of "information rich" and "information poor."
Telecommunications could help solve other problems. It could aid in solving central city problems,
where, for example, the presence of advanced telecommunications facilities could help offset the `
disadvantage of high redevelopment costs. Telecommuting could also reduce peak - period travel
or travel in congested corridors.
However, private providers of advanced telecommunications capabilities have not upgraded their
equipment here as rapidly as they have in other regions. High - capacity fiber optic transmission
lines are not available throughout the region. If the transmission of voice, data and video
experiences a boom as some predict, the existing infrastructure may not be adequate to do the
job.
By and large, governmental units in the region have their own networks to move data or
communicate with their police and fire departments. Telecommunications - -and facility- sharing --
may give them a way to provide more effective services more efficiently. But there is no
coordinated approach, or public sector planning, in telecommunications. Each unit of government
has made its own arrangements with telecommunications vendors to get its needs met.
Goals
1. The region has "leading -edge" telecommunications services readily available to all businesses
and homes.
High - capacity telecommunication transmission facilities and networks move information within
the region and state, and to national and worldwide destinations.
The region's telecommunications infrastructure gives businesses a competitive advantage in
producing and selling products and services to the nation and the world.
11
2. Telecommunications infrastructure is considered as fundamental to the effective functioning of
the region as are roads and sewers.
The region uses telecommunications technology to its fullest extent to provide cost- efficient
access to information and services for all its residents. The region uses telecommunications as
a tool to implement regional policies.
Government agencies throughout the region use telecommunications technology to improve
the quality, effectiveness and coordination of their services. .
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison with previous years)
Miles of fiber optic cable in place
Region's telecommunications ranking nationally and internationally
Public- access points to data and information
Use of telecommunications in development and redevelopment activities
Percent of population that is "computer literate"
Percent of population with access to a personal computer
12
Education
Observers of the K- through -12 education system- -from education, business and government - -have
said that our schools are a little better than the rest of the nation's - -but not good enough for our
future. They offer some criticisms:
• Schools aren't focused on helping students learn; they are organized and run for adults, not
students.
• Expectations are low and there are not many incentives for students or teachers to do well.
• Athletic achievement and "having things" are valued, but academic achievement is not.
• The region's high school graduation rate is high (at 91 percent), it may be because the
standards are low. For example, Minnesota is one of only eight states that require less than
175 instructional days per year; 90 percent of Minnesota high school students are allowed to
spend as little as five hours in class; and only 13 percent attend districts that have established
formal homework policies.
• The education system has a dismal record of meeting the educational needs of our growing
racial and ethnic minority populations. For example, 30 percent of the 6,000 -plus students iner
the seven -county region who dropped out of school in 1991 were from racial or ethnic
minority groups. By contrast, minorities make up only 16 percent of the total student
population in the region.
• School boards have been criticized for focusing on financial and administrative matters at the
expense of students. School boards have also been called monopoly systems with exclusive
franchises that are reluctant to allow others to create schools.
In addition, businesses find an increasing number of high school graduates ill- equipped to perform
work that requires even basic language and math skills. But, at most, one -third of Minnesota's
high school districts have established minimum standards for graduates' reading and mathematics
skills. Approximately 555,000 Minnesotans between the ages of 18 and 64 are unable to read,
write, compute, problem -solve or cope with changing conditions sufficiently well to meet the
requirements of adult life in our society. If this region is to compete with the world, high school
students must be better trained
On average, Minnesota spends more for education than most states (17 percent more per capita),
and has increased its financial commitment steadily over the past 20 years. In 1992 -93 Minnesota
will spend 30 percent of its $15.4 billion budget on elementary and secondary school education.
But recognized measures show that performance has in fact declined. While Minnesota still ranks
high in American College Test scores, the results have been dropping more than the national
average. Scholastic Aptitude Test and Advance Placement scores have continued to steadily
decline. The Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores have actually dipped below the national
average. The question arises: What kind of education are our young people getting for the
money we spend?
13
Goals
1. Education is valued and supported. The regional community places a high value on educating
its children and youth. It is a top priority to provide financial and other resources so that
students can develop the capabilities they need to reach their full potential.
2. Education is focused on students, and helping them learn is the highest priority of education.
Students are interested in learning and know how to learn- -they can use information, solve
problems and work in teams. Being "educated" means being equipped with the academic,
social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as a citizen, worker and parent in a
rapidly changing society.
The community sets high expectations for students. It stresses students' efforts and honors
their academic achievements. Students understand the community's expectations and know
they have to demonstrate mastery of specific skills in order to graduate.
3. The community encourages innovation and excellence in teaching that improves the way
students learn. It supports and rewards these efforts. Schools and teachers are rewarded
based primarily on results.
The teaching profession is sought after by people who have a passion for teaching and
learning. People with diverse backgrounds obtain certification using their education, practical
and professional experiences. The profession attracts and retains the best educators.
4. The governance of public education is broadly based, involving parents, students, educators
and many others in the community.
5. A restructured school system that provides learning opportunities from early childhood on has
replaced the conventional K -12 public school structure of the 20th century. Parents and
students choose among a broad range of school organizations, settings and schedules.
Students progress based on demonstrated competency of the material. Often, they are
grouped across ages to learn from each other. Much of their learning takes place in the
community at business, government and other sites. Learning is enhanced by extensive use of
technology.
6. The entire community- -in a cooperative, coordinated effort--joins teachers in working to
nurture, support and applaud students in their educational efforts. It provides a safe, healthy
environment that promotes learning. Parents are actively involved in their children's
education and create a home environment that encourages learning. Schools are "community
centers" where citizens interact with students to help them learn. Businesses, civic
organizations, social- service agencies, and secular and religious organizations provide learning
opportunities and recognize academic achievement.
7. Cultural differences are celebrated and shared. Students learn about and respect the
practices, beliefs and historical contributions of different cultures. In order to share more
fully in the global society, students can speak languages of the world in addition to English.
14
8. Higher education in the region is available to all students based on ability to learn and choice,
rather than on ability to pay.
The region's higher education institutions foster research and development as part of their
mission to educate students and generate discoveries of new knowledge.
9. People assume that they will continue to learn throughout their lives. The community
provides_ affordable educational opportunities that are flexible enough to meet the people's
needs for job training, citizenship and other learning in a rapidly changing world.
10. The region'i educational system produces a highly - skilled and motivated work force that fuels
our businesses' efforts to grow and compete in the global economy.
Examples of Possible Measures
School readiness - -an indicator that the student has the health, nutrition, developmental skills and
family support necessary for success in school, compared over time
Average state score on school achievement tests as a ratio to the national average, or, as an
alternative, the proposed competency -based graduation requirement of the Minnesota State
Board of Education (1992)
Schools with drop -out rates over 10 percent ( "drop - out" is defined as a student absent from school
for a 12 month period, a definition used nationally)
Percentage of high - school graduates who are pursuing advanced education or training one year
after high - school, compared over time
Percentage of recent high - school graduates rated average or better in work skills by their
employers, compared over time
15
Quality of Life
Quality of life is made up of all the things we expect, that we value, and are committed to
maintain through payments of time, energy or money. Quality of life is all the reasons people like
to live in the Twin Cities Area -- personal well- being, living conditions, opportunities to be part of
a community, work life, physical surroundings and leisure time activities. Quality of life is all the
things that we would miss if they were gone, the things that make this region special and 'better"
than many other areas.
Many people believe that the region has a high quality of life, that there are many unique and
good things here. All citizens do not necessarily share those feelings, especially those who believe
that they do not have equal access to opportunities in the community.
There is danger in assuming that everyone participates in a high quality of life. And we risk
complacency if we do not recognize and preserve the quality of life that we have, even as we seek
ways to improve it. We need to be aware that focusing on the long -term quality of life may also
mean forgoing some short-term gains, or even sacrifices, for some long -term efforts.
The dimensions of our quality of life are diverse and growing more so, and will change over time.
We need to be flexible to respond to changes desired by future generations.
E'
A. INDIVIDUAL WELL - BEING, THE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY
A decent, affordable place to live and the safety and security of person and property are basic
needs that must be met before many other quality-of -life aspects can be considered. As important
as they are, however, our region has a ways to go toward meeting those needs. The crime rate,
for example, has continued to go up. Between 1980 and 1989, incidents of reported violent crime
went up 42 percent in Minneapolis and 22 percent in St. Paul. The lack of affordable housing
continues to plague the region despite decades of efforts to deal with the problem. In 1990, for
example, 40 percent of all renter households in the region (113,000 people) paid more than 30
percent of their income for rent, a standard measure of housing affordability. And nearly one-
fourth of renter households had annual incomes below $10,000.
Another essential ingredient of individual well -being is access to a basic level of goods and
services, especially health care. Access to health care, however, remains a problem. In 1988, six
percent of the population was not covered by health insurance for all or part of the year.
Moreover, the infant mortality rate - -often linked to a lack of prenatal care - -has increased for
people of ethnic and racial minorities. In 1985, for example, the infant mortality rate for African
Americans was 16.38 per 1,000 live births; in 1988 it jumped to 20.46. For Asian Americans, the
rate rose from 5.65 in 1985 to 8.54 in 1988.
Parents should be able to expect that they can raise their children in the best possible
environment and that they and their family will not be trapped in poverty or hindered by
discrimination. But in 1990, 11 percent of all children in the region lived in poverty; and 36
percent of families headed by women had incomes below the poverty level, an increase from 30
percent in 1980. For people of racial and ethnic minorities, the percent living in poverty was
much higher. 37 percent of African Americans, 41 percent of American Indians, 32 percent of
Asian Americans, 19 percent of persons of Hispanic origin and 24 percent of other races. We
must provide opportunities to people for education and work that enable them to earn a living
and provide for their basic needs.
16
As these and other issues are addressed, the region needs to foster a sense in its people that they
have a personal stake in their local communities and in other communities in the region. The
weaknesses of some communities can affect the future of others. People who have the means
should be willing to give of their time and money to make the region a better place to live- -
viable, progressive and constantly striving for improvement. This spirit of contributing and caring
has been strong here and is an essential ingredient for building a better area in the future.
Goals
1. The region has a comprehensive, cost- effective system to deliver high - quality health care and
related services with choices in treatment alternatives for physical and mental illnesses. All
the region's residents have access to health care services. The region has a highly rated
emergency response system.
The region's health care system emphasizes preventing health problems and promoting health
and wellness. The region has improved the health status of its residents based on a wide
range of indicators- -for example, reduced deaths and injuries otchildren. from family abuse
and neglect, a reduced death rate from cardiovascular disease, increased levels of physical
activity of the population, and increased immunization for infections diseases.
2. All residents of the region feel safe and secure in their homes, neighborhoods streets,
sidewalks, schools and parks. They have confidence that public safety personnel will respond.
quickly and appropriately, regardless of where they live or their minority or economic status.
The region's ranking compared to the rates of violent and property crimes in other
metropolitan areas, both in the central cities and suburbs, are lower than the region's rank in
population size. Sales and use of illegal drugs have substantially decreased.
3. All types of family structures are supported so parents can carry out their responsibilities and
their children can develop into adults who take 'responsibility for themselves and their
community. Elderly and disabled people have every opportunity to live independently as
much and as long as possible. Extended families have more support to care for their members
and do not need to rely on institutions.
4. The basic needs of all of the area's population for shelter, food, water, clothing and energy
are met. The percentage of the region's population living in poverty has decreased.
Everyone has equal opportunities for education, employment, housing, leisure or social
activities regardless of their race, color, creed, religion, national- origin, gender, disability, age,
status with regard to public assistance or sexual orientation.
Cultural values and religious beliefs are recognized and celebrated.
5. Residents of the region have a sense of pride in and belonging to their community, and a
concern for its long -range future. The region continues to be an example to other
metropolitan areas for its recognition of and participation in volunteerism, corporate
leadership and contributions to nonprofit charitable and cultural organizations.
17
6. Housing is affordable and available for all income groups throughout the urban area of the
region. An increased percentage of households in the region own their homes.
Appropriate housing is available for persons at all stages of their lives as well as for persons
with special housing needs -- people with disabilities, children, elderly and others.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Percent of population, especially children, living below the poverty line
Number of reported cases of child abuse or neglect
Number of teen pregnancies
Infant mortality rate
Drug and alcohol- related death rate
Number of homeless people
Percent of households below the median income spending more than 30 percent of income on
housing
Ranking of region among other metro areas in health care
Rates of violent crime and domestic violence
DWI arrest and conviction rates
Rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS _
Percent of pretax revenue contributed by major businesses to social programs, the arts and other F
activities
B. EMPLOYMENT
The region's quality of life depends upon its economic base. Its future success is dependent upon
increasing the pool of highly skilled jobs filled by highly skilled labor, both professional and
technical. An individual's quality of life also depends on the economic base, and the ability to
qualify for, find and hold a job that can support a family. Trends in the 1980s raise serious
questions about whether it is possible to greatly expand the number of "sustainable" jobs. For
example, the biggest increase in employment during the decade was in the service and retail
sectors (65 percent of new jobs), which pay, the lowest average weekly wages.
Employment is expected to continue moving away from the central cities and into the suburbs
over the next 25 years. The Metro. Council forecasts that the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
will see little or no growth in employment between 1990 and 2020. On the other hand, suburban
job growth continues. For example, between 1980 and 1989, 67 percent of all net new jobs were
created in the region's developing suburbs. And suburban job growth will increase substantially in
the future, particularly in the southern and southwestern suburbs. The increases, if they occur,
will mean that people will be travelling to the job -rich suburbs in far greater numbers for service
and retail work. But their incomes may not permit them to live in the higher -priced suburban
housing near available jobs.
Goals
1. An increased proportion of jobs pay a wage that can support a family. Employment
opportunities, rates and wages of Metropolitan Area women and minorities are equal to those
of white males.
18
2. Employment opportunities are maintained and increased in areas with existing, affordable
housing. More affordable housing opportunities are available in areas with growing
employment.
Residents have a wide range of employment opportunities within a 30- minute commute by
public transit within the urban area.
3. Everyone has opportunities for retraining and reemployment.
Each student graduating from high school, technical or vocational colleges has the knowledge
and skills necessary to obtain an entry level job, and over the long run, to compete and
survive in the employment market.
4. Large businesses in the region have on -site child care available. Smaller employers have
cooperative child care arrangements.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Per capita income for women and racial and ethnic minorities
Ratio of workers in manufacturing to service and retail sectors
Number of persons unemployed more than 26 weeks
Percent real growth in average wages per worker
Ratio of the region's average wages per worker to the national average
Number of businesses with child care available to employees
C. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The physical environment encompasses both the natural resources of the area -- water, air, soils,
minerals, vegetation and animal life - -and the developed landscape that consists of the facilities
and services required by a large urban population. If the Metropolitan Area of 2015 is to be a
better place to live in than it is today, there will have to be a closer relationship between the
natural and the human -built environment. Past abuses of the natural environment will need to be
corrected, and urban development will be fully integrated into the environment. New
development will put greater emphasis on good urban design and functional efficiency. The end
result will be a metropolitan area that is an attractive, well - functioning and exciting place to live
for all of its residents.
The region faces major challenges in pursuing these goals:
• We need to continue improving water quality through better wastewater treatment as our
population increases, effluent standards become more strict, and costs go up.
• The amount of pollution from "nonpoint" sources (for example, from farms and paved parking
lots) must substantially decrease. It will require changes in the personal, household and
business practices of people in the region, as well as those upstream of the region.
• We need to maintain the region's competitive advantage in water resources by managing them
wisely.
• We need to reduce the amount of waste we generate and find productive reuses for it rather
than burying it in landfills.
• We need to make better choices in the way we develop our land, to minimize the impacts on
the environment and consider the full range of physical, economic and social consequences.
19
• The region needs to develop in a manner that allows ins to economically and efficiently
provide the full range of urban facilities and services.
• We need to retain the historic, central role of the downtowns of Minneapolis and St. Paul,
even as the region continues to developed outward.
• We need to increase the concentration of development in the major suburban business
centers so they can become additional hubs of activity.
• We need to arrest the physical deterioration of houses and businesses, and bring deteriorated
areas into productive use.
• We need to develop and retain a sense of place and a local sense of distinctiveness within the
urbanized area.
Goals
1. All large tracts of land with high - quality or unique natural resource and scenic values will be
available for public use. All public waters have public access. All natural watercourses,
including wetlands, channels, floodplains and shorelands are sufficiently protected to allow
them to function naturally. The region continues to be "water rich," and with careful
management of this valuable resource, meets the multiple demands on groundwater and
surface water. The region's soil and mineral resources are carefully managed.
2. There is swimmable and fishable water quality in the region's three major rivers and some 100
lakes with major potential for recreation or for domestic water supply. Levels of nonpoint-
source pollution generated locally are as low as possible under existing technology and within
economic constraints. Levels of such pollution generated outside the region are substantially
below those of 1992. Regional sanitary sewer service is of high quality, affordable, and
available when and where needed within the urban service area. All residual materials from
wastewater treatment plants are put to beneficial uses.
The region has reduced the per capita amounts and toxicity of waste generated compared with
1992 conditions. Reuse and recycling are at the highest level that is technologically achievable
and economically feasible. There is little landfilling of wastes. There are no more major
pollution sites to be cleaned up, and all previously contaminated sites have been put back into
beneficial uses.
The region attains or exceeds all federal and state ambient air quality standards.
3. The physical development pattern of the region is directed toward reducing traffic congestion,
energy consumption, air pollution and negative effects on the natural environment.
All decisions about physical development consider all the direct and indirect impacts of
development or siting of facilities, such as noise, visual impacts, land use conflicts, traffic and
congestion, environmental disruption and consequences for the social fabric of neighborhoods.
At the same time, essential facilities for the region are accommodated
4. The region has an urban service area with a compact, contiguous development pattern and
densities high enough to make delivering services efficient, yet balanced with open space and
the natural environment. In the rural area, productive farm lands and open spaces are
preserved and development limited to be consistent with a rural level of public services.
20
The two downtowns continue to be viable commercial centers, with increased emphasis on
large - scale, unique facilities and events. Major retail and office concentrations, such as those
around regional shopping centers, are secondary focal points and hubs of activity. These areas
are more densely developed than in 1992, offer a wider variety of goods and services, contain
a mix of commercial and residential uses, and are highly accessible via the transportation
system. Community and neighborhood centers continue to provide essential goods and
services for nearby residents.
The freestanding growth centers are maintained as distinct and separate concentrations of
development.
5. Aging areas have been rehabilitated so they can continue to be viable neighborhoods. Priority
is given to maintaining the existing housing stock and making it useful for the future, instead
of demolishing and replacing it. Supporting infrastructure has been updated or renewed as
needed. Maintenance and rehabilitation have focused equally on residential as well as
commercial and industrial components so these areas can continue to provide both housing
and jobs.
6. Regional and local governments make substantial use of a variety of urban design concepts in
developing and redeveloping the urban area. Open spaces and natural features, as well as the
'built" features like transportation facilities and public buildings are used to enhance the F
environment. A "sense of place" has been created within the urban fabric through the use of
aesthetics and good design. Historic areas and structures are preserved when new
development and redevelopment occurs. All urban design recognizes that the region is a
"winter city" that functions and is attractive in all four seasons. A healthy "urban forest" is
being maintained and expanded.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Land area in natural resource - related public ownership at all levels
Water quality reports of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Number of violations of pollution discharge permits
River miles that do not meet standards of being "fishable and swimmable"
Amount of wetland acres filled
Quantity of water used
Percentage of water supply systems meeting state drinking water standards
Quantity of solid waste not recycled
Quantity of hazardous wastes generated
Toxic chemicals release or transferred (millions of pounds per year)
Number of days per year that air quality standards are violated
Tons of soil lost (per acre of cropland)
Number of "Super Fund" sites identified and the number cleaned up
Number of petroleum release sites and the number cleaned up
Amount of prime agricultural land lost to development
Acres of land enrolled in Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program
Acres of land added to the metropolitan urban service area, defined by the Metropolitan Council
Number of jobs by location, downtowns and suburban activity concentrations
Retail sales and sales tax data
Annual issuance of building permits
Demolition permits
21
Trip generation/traffic data for highways and transit useri
Transit ridership and level of transit service
Average annual energy use (average BTUs per person)
Percentage of urban tree cover
D. LEISURE AND ENTERTAINMENT
The leisure and entertainment opportunities available in the region are good indicators of our
high quality of life. Though not necessities- -like shelter, a job, security or transportation, for
example -- leisure and entertainment opportunities are nonetheless important. They challenge us,
stimulate us, excite us and enrich our lives. Our participatory and spectator sports, outdoor
activities, cultural institutions and community events increase the pleasure of living in the region.
They help attract businesses and skilled workers to our area.
Some of the major challenges in achieving these goals:
• We need to maintain the high level of cultural and recreational opportunities available in the
region today, in light of competing demands for public and private resources.
• We currently do not have the financial resources to implement the regional parks system
currently envisioned. The current estimate is that $300 million will be needed to complete the
development and redevelopment of the system.
• As communities develop, they will be challenged to keep up with the changing recreational
needs of their population, and to establish local park systems early in their development.
• Concerns, about access to activities and information will continue to grow as technology
increases and if dispersed growth patterns continue.
Goals
1. The region offers a rich range of cultural opportunities in music, art and theater. Citizens
have more opportunities to take part as active participants as well as to view, watch and listen.
2. Everyone has access to key information sources, including the information and entertainment
media, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television or any new media that may develop.
Libraries are more accessible and use the latest technology. All private, public, governmental
agency, school and university libraries are linked electronically.
3. A park system composed of local, regional and state parks provides a wide range of activities.
The regional park system envisioned in 1992 is now completed. Local parks are located
within walking distance of urban residents' homes. A trail system for walking, hiking and
biking is in place throughout the region, within walking distance from urban residents' homes.
Park facilities respond to users needs: they provide recreational opportunities for all residents
irrespective of age, income or mobility status.
The region has sufficient athletic fields, golf courses, hockey rinks or other recreational
facilities (indoor and outdoor) to meet the standards of the National Recreation and Park
Association. Facilities provide for year -round activities. The number of available activities
and facilities is increasing at 1e6st as fast as the population growth rate.
The region is home to major professional sports, and there are sufficient facilities to
accommodate the teams and the fans.
Fla
Opportunities are available for game fishing in lakes and rivers within the region. Habitat is
maintained so that there is access to hunting opportunities within a day's trip from the region.
4. All major leisure and entertainment facilities in the urban area are accessible by public transit.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Attendance at arts performances
Number of amateur sports participants
Number of participants attending professional sporting events
Percent of homes with telephone service
Percent of homes with access to cable television
Miles of public recreational trails
Library circulation data
Acres of remaining regional parks to be acquired
Number of public access facilities on lakes and rivers
Park user counts
Attainment of National Recreation and Park Association standards
ss•
23
; �. � 'T
/.1
o e
lose SDv
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: MARCELLA DAEHN , CLERK
Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992
Subject: ELECTION JUDGES FOR
GENERAL /CITY ELECTION
Agenda Item #
° -I
Consent
[E
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
Motion
n
Resolution
E]
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation: Adoption of the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the election judges on the
attached list be appointed for the General /City Election on November 3, 1992;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make
any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary.
Info /Background:
Pursuant to Minnesota Election Law 204B.21, election judges shall be appointed
by the governing body of the municipality.
(over)
Proposed
General Election Judges
November 3, 1992
Precinct 1A - Shepherd of Hills Church
1. Genie Williams, Chair
2. Lois Hallquist
3. Dorothy Capetz
4. Virginia Vonhof
5. Arlene Friday
6. Shirley DeLeo
7. Janet Remington
8. Shirley Graziano
9. Virginia Anthony
10. Cathee Hare
Precinct 1B - Chapel Hills Church
1. Ardis Dorsey, Chair
2. Jean Liudahl, Co -Chair
3. Sue Corson
4. Catherine Murphy
5. Marianne Schoenecker
6.
Donna White
7.
Nancy Hopf
8.
Jean Altman
9.
Diane Safley
10.
Brenda Brink
Precinct 2 - Edina City Hall
1. Marjorie Ruedy, Chair
2. Joan Flumerfelt
3. Sue Hirsch
4. Carol Bucklin
5. Lorraine Purdy
6. Naomi Johnson
7. Kay Tierney
8. Mary Ann Haemig
9. Florence Tretten
10. Elizabeth Anfinson
Precinct 3 - Edina Covenant Church
1. Patricia Dill, Chair
2. Deidre Hedrick
3. Margaret Hagerty
4. Patricia Schwartz
5. Mara Ingwalson
6. Mary Webber
7. Barbara Bergan
8. Cindy Farmer
9. Sherrill Estenson
10. Kathleen Stiehm
A, - '.
500 S. Blake Rd.
50th St.
6425
Mendelssohn La. (55343)
938 -5086
305
Grove Place (55343)
938 -5886
6304
Waterman Ave. (55343)
935 -5724
414
Harrison Ave. S. (55343)
935 -1126
6525
Belmore Lane (55343)
933 -4464
609
Wataerman Ave. (343)
938 -3859
6424
Belmont.La. (343)
938 -0319
613
Waterman Cir. (343)
935 -5724
301
Griffit St. (343)
935 -3768
5306
Malibu Dr. (36)
933 -1824
6512 Vernon Ave.
50th St.
6624
Parkwood Rd.
(36)
933 -2649
6075
Lincoln Dr.
(36)
938 -4986
5408
Stauder Cir.
(36)
938 -3456
6143
Arctic Way
(36)
938 -4287
4218
Scott Ter.
(16)
927 -8039
6016
Tracy Ave.
(16)
929 -4296
6445.Vernon
Ave.
(36)
935 -6244
6151
Arctic Way
(36).
935 -4801
6715
Parkwood La.
(36)
938 -6'
6670
Vernon Ave.
(36)
935 -4:)_
4801 W.
50th St.
5048
Edinbrook Ave.
(36)
922 -271
5225
Division St.
(36)
929 -211
5345
Division St.
(36)
925 -144
4370
Brookside Ct.
#321 (36)
922 -207
5040
Edinbrook La.
(36)
929 -102
5140
Bedford Ave.
(36)
929 -097
5016
Oxford Ave. (36)
(24)
929 -094
5032
Bedford Ave.
(36)
929 -114
5145
Bedford Ave.
(36)
929 -808
5290
Villa Way (36)
(24)
929 -225
4201 W.
50th St.
4610
Edina Blvd.
(24)
922 -4879
4531
Wooddale Ave.
(24)
926 -2428
4515
Edina Blvd.
(24)
927 -5980
4508
W. 44th St.
(24)
926 -3841
4612
Arden Ave.
(24)
922 -8652
5201
Kellogg Ave.
(24)
922 -6976
4801
Woodhill Way
(24)
926 -1141
4612
Casco Ave.
(24)
926 -2?
4528
Arden Ave.
(24)
926 -0,
4520
W. 44th St.
(24)
929 -81y.s
1992 General Election Judges
Precinct 4 - Morningside Buildinq
1. Rachel Schoening, Chair
Marion Cracraft
Lois Loomis
4. Shirley Renslow
5. Jean Hubers
6. Betty Goughner
7. Lisa Bjerken
9. Mandics Krisztina
10. Theresa Carufel
Precinct 5 - Highlands School
1. Rosemary McGlynn, Chair
2. Barbara Martin
3. Roe Ann Forbes
4. Anne Francis
5. Marie Goblirsch
6. Sally Olson
7. Mary E. Ryan
8. Janet Nelson
9. Ann Swanson
10. Carolyn Setterberg
Drecinct 6 - Countryside School
Jane Bains - Chair
Catherine Swanson
3. Mary Cleaveland
4. Barbara Herbers
5. Jean Flaaten
6. Audrey Clay
7. Alice Lehrke
8. Beverly Koch
9. Marilyn Breitenbucker
10. Mae Warner
Precinct 7 - Normandale Church
1. Kathleen Engquist - Chair
2. Helen Peterson
2. Ellen Nein-
3. Janet Kanofsky
4. Mary Ellen Pratt
5. Lois Strupp
6. Gertrude Snoeyenbos
7. Eunice Overby
8. Florence Mase
9. Mary Rogers
10. Shirley Rickard
5005
Doncaster Way
Page Two
4114
Grimes Ave.
927 -5124
4014
Monterey Ave. (16)
922 -545
4227
Alden Dr. (16)
922 -662
4500
W. 42nd St.,(16)
926 -354
4232
France Ave. S. (16)
927 -989
4017
Natchez Ave. (16)
927 -906
4828
Townes Rd. (24)
922 -140
4405
Ellsworth Dr. (35)
922 -040
4005
Lynn Ave. (16) -
925 -058
4324
W. 42nd St. (16)
026 -684
5005
Doncaster Way
6212
4909
Rolling Green Pkwy. (36)
927 -5124
5205
Mirror Lakes Dr. (36)
929 -1808
6101
Saxony Rd. (36)
938 -7168
4909
Bywood West (36)
925 -4510
6200
Idylwood La. (36)
933 -8428
5528
Glengarry Pkwy. (36)
922 -3578.
5508
Goya La. (36)
926 -5139
5105
Lake Ridge Rd. (36)
938 -7703
5804
South Dr. (36)
927 -4663
5213
Chantrey Rd. (36) -
929 -9018
5.701
Benton Ave.
6212
6101
Tracy Ave. (36)
929 -9362
5804
Merold Dr. (36)
929 -8387
6204
Crest La. (36)
929 -5486
5801
Stuart Ave. (36)
929 -2521
5513
Warden Ave. (36)
929 -7365
5716
Wycliffe Rd. (36)
929 -3835
6120
Crescent Dr. (36)
929 -6170
6113
Westridge Blvd. (36)
929 -5069
5424
Grove St. (36)
925 -5063
6136
Sherman Cir. (36)
925 -2061
6100 Normandale Rd.
6212
Wyman Ave. (36)
929 -9497
6121
Code Ave. (36).
929 -7067
5204
W. 61st St (36)
927 -8806
5120
Windsor Ave. (36)
926 -1764
5241
Richwood Dr. (36)
929 -2382
5113'Richmond
Dr. (36)
929 -5439
5125
Valley View Rd. (36)
929 -5414
5004
Kent Ave. (36)
929 -4300
5249
Richwood Dr. (36)
929 -7001
5608
Dale Ave. (36)
926 -2834
5709
Hansen Rd. (36)
929 -6043
1992
General Election Judges
Page Three
Precinct 8 - Southview Jr. High
4725
Southview La.
1.
Jane Moran, Chair
5429
Wooddale Ave. (24)
920 -0558
2.
Myra Hykes
4516
Woodland Rd. (24)
929 -7595
3.
Jeanne Sedoff,
4601
Concord Terr. (24)
927 -5860
4.
Ordell O'Neill
5656
Wooddale Ave. (24)
920 -6361
5.
Catherine Tobin
5500
Brookview Ave. (24)
926 -1993
6.
Mona Reding
5705
Woodland La. (24)
925 -3877
7.
Shirley Sorenson
4024
Wood End Dr. (24)
920 -0799
8.
Shirley Sallen
5717
St.. Johns Ave. (24)
927 -5039
9.
Bernardine Scofield
5601
Kellogg P1. (24)
926 -5591
10.
Nancy Wyatt
5645
Wooddale Ave. (24)
920 -6561
Precinct '9 - "Concord School
5900
Concord Ave.
1.
Colleen Crew, Chair
6215
Halifax Ave. (24)
925 -1629
2.
Florence Boughton
5921
Fairfax Ave. (24)
920 -b454
3.
Marie Robinson
5928
Halifax Ave. (24)
925 -3419
4.
Mary Strother
5917
Drew Ave. S. (10)
922 -8579
5.
Coleen Cavell
6009
Wooddale Ave. (24)
927 -4703
6.
Betty Comstock
4705
School Rd. (24)
926 -4467
7.
Nancy Grimsby
5932
Wooddale Ave. (24)
922 -9403
8.
Patricia Monson
6000
Ashcroft Ave. (24)
922 -1463
9.
Jacqueline Lindskoog
6112
Kellogg Ave. (24)
920 -6599
10.
Martha Albrecht
5300
Brookview Ave. (24)
922 -7899
Precinct 10 - Creek Valley School
6401
Gleason Rd.
1.
Barbara Erlandson, Chair
6501
Nordic Dr. (39)
941 -4011
2.
Carol Ladner
4931
Green Farm Ct. (36)
920 -1470
3.
Connie Nelson
6215
St. Albins Cir. (36)
941 -0519
4.
Milly Karr
5121
Lake Ridge Rd. (36)
938 -9283
5.
Lee Strang
16 Woodland Rd. (24)
925 -3807
6.
Mary Sjoquist
6713
Cheyenne Tr. (35)
941 -6187
7.
Sharon Hed
6624
Iroquois Tr. (35)
944 -6456
8,
Marguerite Ratelle
6716
Arrowhead Pass (35)
941 -3956
9.
Ruth Haggerty
6804
Sally Lane (35)
941 -2731
10.
Gladys Lidstone
6800
Sally Lane (35)
941 -4724
Precinct 11 - Creek Valley Church
6901
Tracy Ave
1.
Betty Pollitt, Chair
6412
Limerick La. (39)
941 -1073
2.
Karen Vickman
5201
Tifton Dr. (39)
941 -8576
3.
Rita Acker
6401
Wilryan Ave. (39)
941 -9316
4.
Carol Melichar
6417
Wilryan Ave. (39)
941 -4674
5.
Doris Blake
6701
Southdale Rd. (35)
910 -1470
6.
Mary A. Ryan
6824
Brook Dr. (39)
941 -9616
7.
Muza Habeck --
5100
Duggan Plaza (39)
941 -3959
8.
Mary Ann Kubin
600
W. 66th St. (39)
941 -1307
9.
Bernadine Chapman
4860
W. 64th St. (35)
922 -1370
10.
Mary Kirsch
6801
Brook Dr. (39)
941 -1866
1992 General Election Judges
2recinct 12 - Christ Church
1. Shirley Bjerken - Chair
2. Ardis Wexler
3. Marlys Hittner
4. Sue Kracum
5. Mary Scholz
6, Doris Barry
7. Marge Erstad
8. JoAnne Chayer
9. Marilyn Larson
10. Doris Marchuk
Precinct 13 - Centennial Lakes Park
1. Doris Peterson, Chair
2. Annadell Quantrell
3. Rebecca Larson
4. Kathleen Hansing
5. Audrey Sherman
6. D'Arcy Secord
7. Anne Matula
8. Patricia Robbins
9. Della Possis
10. Margaret Ryan
Precinct 14 - St. Peters Church
1. Mary Jane Platt, Chair
2. Joyce Hanson
3. Esther Olson
4. Patricia Bartlett
5. Louise Carlson
6. Donna Brastad
7. Lavayne Finberg
8. Marcia Willett
9. Jean Reichow
10. Barbara Butler
Precinct 15 - Valley View High School
1. Kaye Luikens, Chair
2. Jean Hare
3. Sharon Soderlund
4. Joann Buie
5. Carol Hanson
6. Nancy Meyer
7. Maxine Steinberg
8. Carolyn Klus
9. Virginia Sweeney
Maxine Wallin
Page Four
6901 Normandale Rd.
4405
Ellsworth Dr. (35)
922 -0406
49113
Larkspur La. (35)
925 -2097
4405
Dunberry La. (35)
927 -9179
4900
Payton Ct. (35)
926 -5932
4512
Gilford Dr. (35)
920 -2152
7208
Oaklawn Ave. (35)
927 -5833
4401
Dunberry La. (35)
929 -2527
4812
Wilford Way (35
922 -2015
4801
Upper Ter. (35)
922 -6240
4600
Gilford Dr. (35)
922 -4360
7499 France
Ave.
S.
Claredon Dr. (39)
4120
Parklawn
ave. (35)
835 -7951
4380
Parklawn
Ave. (35)
897 -1763
4415
Parklawn
Cr. (35)
835 -0923
4741
Hibiscus
Ave. (35)
926 -1177
4120
Parklawn
Ave. #130 (35)
831 -2200
4428
Gilford
Dr. (35)
920 -4502
4145
Parklawn
Ave. (35)
830 -1069
4101
Parklawn
Ave. (35)
844 -0647
6339
Barrie Rd. (35)
927 -8826
4075
W. 51st
St. (24)
920 -5022
5421
France Ave.
S.
Claredon Dr. (39)
5504
Beard Ave.
S. (10)
926 -8447
5829
Drew Ave. S.
(10)
926 -8856
5441
York Ave. S.
(10)
926 -1006
6012
Zenith Ave.
S. (10)
926 -0142
3700
Chowen Curve
(10)
926 -6253
5701
Chowen Ave.
S. (10)
926 -3468
3808
W. 57th St.
(10)
920 -4867
5809
Beard Ave.
S. (10)
922 -1275
5501
Dewey Hill
Rd. (39)
941 -4054
4005
W. 62nd St.
(24)
926 -3596
6750 Valley View Rd.
7310
Claredon Dr. (39)
944 -1016
6917
Mark Terrace Dr. (39)
944 -3877
7108
Mark Terrace Dr. (39)
944 -7449
6224
Braeburn Cir. (39)
941 -7979
5908
Chapel Dr. (39)
944 -2759
6001
Dublin Cit. (39)
941 -4178
5719
Long Break Tr. (39)
941 -4637
7017
Valley View Rd. (39)
941 -5195
7129
Gleason Rd. (39)
941 -4225
7022
Tupa Cir. 55439
941 -4628
1992 General Election Judges
Precinct 16 - Cornelia School
I. Mary McDonald, Chair
2. Donna Montgomery
3. Patricia Halvorsen
4. Mary Ann Hans
5. Marlys Chase
6. Katherine Saunders
7. Phyllis Woodley
8. Yvonne Ford
9. Nathalie Person
10. Madeleine Dobbelmann
Precinct 17 - Church of the Master
1. Lorna Livingston, Chair
2. Jean McDermid
3. Louise Jackson
4. Betty Lou Petersen
5. Shirley Breitman
6. Theresa Brown
7. Vernette Wessman
8. Lorraine Welch
9. Joanna Bigler
10. Lois Awes
Precinct 18 - Edinborough Park
1. Jean Erdall, Chair
2. Selma Shelton
3. Mary Zotalis
4. Virginia Stemm
5. Jo Anne Streed
6. Nancy Lichy
7. Joy Perunovich
8. Vera Krause
9. Ruth Downey
10. Gertrude Rocheford
Precinct 19 - Brookview Church
1. Patricia Olander, Chair
2. Anita Delegard
3. Lynne Westphal
4. Harriet Koch
5. Rosemary Booth
6. Joan Ochs
7. Diane Ebert
8. Marie Nelson
9. Alice Olson
10. Ardis Stevenson
. .0
Page Five
7000
Cornelia Dr.
6929
Southdale Road (35)
926 -78L
6824
Oaklawn Ave. (35)
920 -9044
6700
Xerxes Ave. S. (23)
869 -0366
6913
Southdale Rd. (35)
926 -0765
6933
Southdale Rd. (35)
926 -8193
6304
York Ave, S, (35)
925 -9750
6845
Oaklawn Ave. (35)
920 -3375
6308
Barrie Rd. 2D (35)
922 -6606
4520
Laguna Dr. (35)
922 -4547
6405
Colony Way (35)
929 -5383
7128 France Ave.
S.
7001
5920
Wooddale
Ave.
(24)
926 -5322
5116
Mirror Lakes
6455
Dr. (36)
929 -8859
6016
Zenith Ave.
S.
(10)
927 -8279
4313
Cornelia
Cir.
(35)
926 -9523
7200
York Ave.
S.
(35)
897 -1043
7240
York Ave.
S.
(35)
832 -9329
6415
York Ave.
S.
(35)
929 -8739
7313
Wet Shore
Dr.
(35)
926 -2451
7201
York Ave.
S.
#411 (35)
897 -1668
605
Colony Way
(35)
926 -4567
7700
York Ave.
7001
6101
Abbott Ave. (10)
922 -92i
7200
York Ave.
S. (35)
831 -8863
6455
York Ave.
S. (35)
925 -9537
7607
York Ave.
S. (35)
835 -1445
7350
York Ave.
S. #211 (35)
835 -9019
4908
Hibiscus
Ave. (35)
926 -7634
6805
Brook Dr.
(39)
941 -2608
3111
Heritage
Dr. (35)
926 -1120
6085
Lincoln Dr. (36)
938 -0343
5928
Merold Dr. (36)
929 -2392
5017 W. 70th St.
7001
Lee Valley
Cir. (39)
944 -2185
7209
Lanham La.
(39)
941 -5056
5704
Kemrich Dr.
(39)
941 -8493
5501
Dewey Hill
Rd. (39)
944 -0271
6109
St. Johns Ave. (24)
929 -0566
7500
Cahill Rd.
(39)
829 -7511
7004
Lee Valley
Cir. (39)
944 -2666
5925
Halifax Ave. (24)
922 -2957
6324
Pheasant Ct. (36)
929 -6272
4075
W. 51st St.
(24)
922 -8719
Cn
0
• f ~�bAalae/�����
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 1992
Subject:
METRO 2015
Recommendation:
Info /Background
Agenda Item #
v.E .
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Attached is a letter dated August 25, 1992, addressed to Mary
Anderson, Chair of the Metropolitan Council from Vern Peterson,
Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities. This letter represents the response of AMM's
Metropolitan Agencies Committee and Housing and Economic
Development Committee, relative to the Metropolitan Council's
2015 Study.
Also attached is a copy of the Metro 2015 study.
August 25, 1992
Ms. Mary Anderson, Chair
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
230 E. 5th. St.
St. Paul, MN. 55101
Dear Chair Anderson:
On behalf of the AMM's Metropolitan Agencies Committee and the
Housing and Economic Development Committee, I would like to thank
you for the opportunity to comment on the Council's Metro 2015
Vision and Goals document. We commend the Council for developing
a draft for consideration by the public. More importantly, we
commend the Council for this new visioning effort. As you know,
the AMM's Metropolitan Governance Task Force in its preliminary
report issued earlier this year, recommended that the Council
re- emphasize its Visionary Role. The specific recommendation
states "the Metropolitan Council should seize upon its earlier
ability to identify the problems of the future and outline steps
and consequences of solving those problems. This metropolitan
area needs a strong voice and strong leadership to help guide the
area into the future. The Metropolitan Council has the
opportunity to help advance the metropolitan area into the next
century. It should not hesitate to seize the opportunity to
explore aspects of metropolitan life and living and probe them;
not to do so could mean stagnation for this area."
The AMM committees generally agree with the `vision' as foreseen
for 2015 and the six major factors listed at the bottom of page
one which will drive the vision: economic, governance,
transportation, telecommunication, education and quality of life.
The tricky part, however, is turning this vision into reality and
the key challenge that you and the residents of this region face
is identifying and implementing the `specifics' that will make
that happen. It is important that you and the residents of this
area realize that the visioning work has just began and this
document is just step one.
The AMM -as mentioned earlier is very supportive of this `visioning
effort' but we do have a few specific comments we ask you to
consider. The comments are:
-1-
1. Add a new goal on page 6 which reads: "Strengthen the
transformative sector of the economy and focus on highvalue -added
manufacturing jobs ".
2. The AMM commends the Council for recognizing that this
region must compete in a world economy and not just against
other regions of the USA. The Council can and should play a
role in promoting the concept that we are a region when its
comes to competing economically in'a world market and not 139
individual cities.
3. We recommend clarifying goal 5 on page 7. The second and
third sentences should be modified to read as follows: The
Council decides how federal and state funds allocated to the
Metropolitan Area for regional public infrastructure will be
spent. It decides on major direct and indirect public
investments that support facilities of regional
significance located within the Metropolitan Area.
4. Two sentences should be added to Goal 5 to read as
follows: The Council will manage the regional infrastructure
investment to promote a geographically balanced orderly,
economic development of the metropolitan area. This includes
balancing the needs between new development and redevelopment
of the more mature parts of the region.,
5. The committees strongly supports.the emphasize on
telecommunication as delineated on pages 11 and 12.
6. The committees strongly recommend that another subsection be
added to the section dealing with quality of life: The AMM
has a long standing concern about the need for more, good
affordable housing to meet the needs of the lower income
residents of.this region. We have urged the council to
continue its regional role in the provision of such housing.
since adequate, affordable.housing is so essential to the
well being of this region, this `visioning' document should
place more emphasize on housing and shelter. The committees
Also believe more emphasize should be added to neighborhood
preservation which is closely related to housing,
transportation, education and well paying jobs.
7. The AMM believes some modification should be made to section
C. Physical Environment on pages 19, 20, and 21. We suggest
adding a new challenge at the bottom of page 5 to read:
.Polluted.soils are preventing the highest and.best use of
much good land in the older, developed areas of this region.
Under goals on page 20, add a new goal which states: `Remove
impediments to development of well paid jobs including the
clean -up of polluted lands so they can be redeveloped to
highest and best use'.
-2-
The committees believe that the Council must play a strong
leadership role if this region is to achieve the `vision' as
delineated in this document for the year 2015. It also must be
recognized that the private sector and local units of government,
particularly cities where most metropolitan area residents live,
must be active participants in this process or the `vision' will
not be achieved. We suggest that verbage be added to this
document in the appropriate section to spell out the role the
Council sees cities playing in this process.
Again, the AMM appreciates this opportunity to provide input and
we look forward to working with the Metropolitan Council on behalf
of our member cities as we move towards the 21st. century.
Sincerely,
Vern Peterson, Executive Director
-3-
o e A
Cn
�A��. -� .�° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
VI.A
From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: SEPTEMBER 17, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: PETITION FOR STREET
To Council
LIGHTING - VALLEY VIEW RD
& MOCCASIN VALLEY RD
Action
�
Motion
RESIDENTS
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Refer the petition for street lighting at the Valley View Road and Moccasin
Valley Road intersection to the Engineering Department for processing as to
feasibility.
Info /Background:
The attached petition for street lighting dated September 1, 1992, was received
from property owners on Valley View Road and Moccasin Valley Road.
Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department
for processing as to feasibility.
❑SIDEWALK ❑ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STORM SEWER ❑SANITARY SEWER TREET G
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑PERMANENT STREET ❑OTHER:
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above
to the locations listed below. Vh o cc ►4S � l,l V ALA Y 1A;4 p NI'F-l/SEcT►9 W
VALLEY I/IEI J ROAD 4- between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
SIGNATURE
This petition was circulated by:
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
/'�A!/ A4 -A L
rZa�� catiRELI�>
I4akO l d
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
PHONE
// i �/,t°� / q4-11- �'as
�RK10\)�Z CAniF1Ex -17 6rj3t�- VALLE y VIELj 1200 ay1 7ya9
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.
SEPTEMBER 1880
AGENDA ITEM VI.B
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDINA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Deputy Chief Kleven
DATE: September 17, 1992
SUBJECT: Memorandum From Residents of Trillium and Lantana Lanes
On September 16, 1992, I contacted Ms. Suzanne Wolfe, 4812 Trillium
Lane, a spokesperson for the neighborhood safety concerns. After a
lengthy discussion, it was agreed to refer this matter to the Traffic
Enforcement Unit for traffic monitoring and request Public Works install
speed limit signs for north and southbound traffic on the frontage road.
cc: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works
MEMORANDUM.
September, 1992
To: Members of the Edina City Council
From: The Undersigned Edina Residents
(from Trillium and Lantana Lanes)
Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our Area
Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on
Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the
street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast.
(Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to
the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road
[Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a
problem.)
Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant
influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of
Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young
children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed. is
potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in
the area.
We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention
knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the
Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit
enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the
Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of
Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an
appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children.
Name -
./
t
Address
q!0 q '7i2 iLL iLZ /.A, /- -i.,,,
� 7
-'A)L`1 y>VI
4r-l�' ifir'(. 'n
ti' T4 tiA
b'6
q!0 q '7i2 iLL iLZ /.A, /- -i.,,,
� 7
-'A)L`1 y>VI
4r-l�' ifir'(. 'n
MEMORANDUNI
September, 1992
To: Members of the Edina City Council
From: The Undersigned Edina Residents
(from Trillium and Lantana Lanes)
Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our ..Area
Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on
Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the
street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast.
(Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to
the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road
[Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a
problem.)
Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant
influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of
Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young
children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed is
potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in
the area.,
We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention
knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the
Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit
enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the.
Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of
Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an
appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children.
Name
Address
Y9a,I
�/ ,
MEMORANDUM
September, 1992
To: Members of the Edina City .Council
From: The Undersigned Edina Residents
(from Trillium and Lantana Lanes)
Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our Area
Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on
Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the
street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast.
(Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to
the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road
[Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a
problem.)
Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant
influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of
Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young
children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed is
potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in
the area.
We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention
knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the
Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit
enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the
Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of
Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an
appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children.
Name
ceases
BE A;
Address
i 69 010 __ n' 1'1 i wQ I
o I LL,dn /` -4kr
4' 9 a 9 4r,-� Ate_
AGENDA ITEM VIX
Scott Harr
Attorney at Law
5209 Danens Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55439
(612) 942 -9151
September 11, 1992
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Aircraft Noise
Dear Mr. Rosland,
I am writing to request that the City of Edina take a position
concerning the increased aircraft noise over our City. Noise
levels have noticeably increased this summer, and Northwest
Airlines has admitted that it does not intend to abide by voluntary
noise limits.
I grew up in Edina, and returned to purchase my own home here.
Therefore, I have some 30 years experience with aircraft noise
levels. The noise has become excessive, with aircraft starting to
fly overhead as early as 6 a.m. , and as late as 10 p.m., frequently
one after another at 60 second intervals. This is not how things
have been in the past, and it should not be permitted to continue.
For the first time, I have found myself considering the necessity
of moving. The aircraft noise wakes our family, disrupts
conversation, and in general creates a nuisance that the City
should not tolerate.
I encourage the Edina City Administration and the City Council to
take a position by advising the Metropolitan Airports Commission
that the increased noise levels are- excessive and should not be
permitted to continue, and that at a minimum, the voluntary noise
levels agreed to by the airlines need to be complied with.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Scott Harr
cc: Mr-.--Jeff Hamiel, Airport Director
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Mr. Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines
0
Scott Han
Attorney at Law
5209 Danens Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55439
(612) 942 -9151
September 11, 1992
Mr. Jeff Hamiel, Airport Director
Metro Airports Commission
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450
RE: Aircraft Noise
Dear Mr. Hamiel:
I am writing to express my concern over the excessive aircraft
noise over and around my residence. I have clearly been aware of
excessive noise, and I am not exaggerating when I state that it may
occur as early as 6 a.m., going as late as 10 p.m, with hours at a
time when aircraft are passing overhead at 60 second intervals.
The noise wakes my family, interrupts conversations, and is
generally a nuisance.
I have lived on the same street for 30 years, both growing up and
eventually purchasing a house there, so I have a basis of awareness
of aircraft noise level over the years. It has become excessive.
I was distressed to recently read that Northwest Airlines no longer
intends to abide by the voluntary noise limits, which I find
appalling. When I recently called the noise abatement office, I
was led to believe that "wind direction" was the culprit. The news
reports I am now reading indicate that NWA, and possibly other
airlines, are intentionally contributing to this problem by
increasing flights and bringing in older, louder aircraft.
I strongly urge MAC to take a very strong position in enforcing
reasonable noise limits. I have asked the City of Edina to take a
position on this matter, and will continue to work towards this
end.
Sinc ,
Scott Harr
cc: Frederick Richards, Edina City Mayor
Kenneth Rosland, Edina City Manager
Edina City Council
Mr. Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines
HA c9� MINNEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT
9 Q\� 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
�yED 0�`'� Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 -1597
office: (612) 939 -8320 fax: (612) 939 -8244
DISTRICT COORDINATOR: Ellen B. Klanderman
BOARD OF MANAGERS: James R. Spensley, Pres. - John E. Thomas - Thomas W. LaBounty
Robert D. Erickson - C. Woodrow Love - Clardson Lindley* Thomas Maple, Jr.
September 15, 1992
To City Administrator:
LAKE
AGENDA ITEM: VII.A.
The Hennepin Conservation District is currently making available
funds to combat infestations of Eurasian Water Milfoil. These
funds will be used to provide financial assistance to local
governments and community groups. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District was given the opportunity to apply for these supplementary
funds.
The District will be submitting their application this fall, and,
if approved by the Hennepin Conservation District, will be
chemically treating several locations throughout the metro area.
The areas that are currently infested with milfoil are Minnehaha
Creek, Meadowbrook Lake in St. Louis Park, Mill Pond in Edina, and
possibly Lake Hiawatha and Nokomis if infestation has reached those
bodies of water.
It is in the interest of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to
contact appropriate municipalities to determine the level of
support cities are willing to donate towards this project. Even
though cost - sharing funds may be available through Hennepin County,
the District encourages each city to consider playing an active
role in combating milfoil by becoming a contributing sponsor.
I would appreciate a reply by September 30 regarding your interest
in supporting the milfoil program.
I have enclosed a copy of the July 1992 Land & Water Conservation
publication which briefly describes the milfoil control program
that is being implemented by the Hennepin Conservation District.
Sincerely,
Ellen B. Klanderman
District Coordinator
Enc.
(over)
Land &Water Conservation
Published Quarterly by the Hennepin Conservation District
July 1992
Hennepin County Milfoil
Control Program
The Hennepin County Board
of Commissioners has provided
the Hennepin Conservation Dis-
trict with funds to combat infesta-
tions of Eurasian Water Milfoil.
These funds will be used to provid
financial assistance to local gover
ments and community groups in Hennepin County
for milfoil control activities.
Twenty water bodies in Hennepin County are
infested with Eurasian Water Milfoil (Table 1).
Recommended treatment practices vary with the
level of infestation. Early detection of infestations
is important because the plant spreads rapidly and
once established is difficult to control. Eurasian
water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) may be iden-
tified by:
-long stems with feather -like leaves attached in
whorls of four,
- leaves typically having nine to 21 pairs of
leaflets;
- flowers appearing terminally on the stem above
the water; and
- formation of mats at the surface.
Volume 3 Number 3
Leaf
Leaflet pair
Leaf whorl
arrangement
Somoe: MN DNR
Persons interested in applying for financial
assistance for milfoil control activities should con-
tact Carolyn Dindorf or Joel Settles at the Hennepin
Conservation District (544 - 8572). 4}
Hennepin County
Ground Water Plan
The Hennepin County Ground Water Plan has
been distributed to all cities, watershed districts, and
watershed management organizations in the county.
Two meetings have been held with city and water-
shed representatives to informally discuss changes
and improvements to the plan before it is submitted
for formal review. A discussion on specific sugges-
tions about the plan will occur at the next meeting
which will be held in late July.
Suggestions received to date concern language
that is insufficiently flexible to account for existing
land uses. Participants also voiced concern about
the effectiveness and practicality of the organization
that would be used to coordinate local activities for
ground water protection. Hennepin Conservation
District staff is currently considering these concerns
and suggestions.
The plan calls for cities to integrate ground
water protection into their existing planning,
inspection, licensing, and zoning activities. Cities
I Hennepin continued on page 2
f�
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
COUNCIL DATE
9/21/92
page 1
CHECK•
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. M
130186
09/21/92
$185.03
3M CO
SIGNS & POSTS
TP75506
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
3491
< ">
$185.03"
130188
09/21/92
$667.81
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$107.54
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$134.42
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$667.81
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$107.54
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$430.15
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$107.54
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$53.77
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$161.30
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
POOL OPERATION
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$645.23
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$144.29
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$364.16
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$425.87
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
BUILDING & GRO
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$36.75
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$63.63
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$159.22
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOV
09/21/92
$54.57
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
9/92
GUN RANGE
RUBBISH REMOV
< *>
$4,331.60*
130189
09/21/92
$40.91
AEI ELECTRONIC
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
086432 -0 PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3526
< *>
$40.91"
130190
09/21/92
$173.71
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
1475b3
ADMINISTRATION
BLUE PRINTING
<•>
$173.71*
130192
09/21/92
$40.00
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4738
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
09/21/92
$41.45
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4738
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
09/21/92
$245.40
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4862
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
2373
09/21/92
$159.63
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$9.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$36.13
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$36.13
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$63.25
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
POOL OPERATION
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$34.00
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$31.48
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$153.36
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$26.78
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
719.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$9.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$9.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$461.21
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
EQUIPMENT OPER
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$36.45
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$31.95
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$189.89
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
PW BUILDING
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$9.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
50TH ST OCCUPA
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$29.40
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$9.50
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
VERNON OCCUPAN
PROF S RVICES
09/21/92
$26.00
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF S RVICES
09/21/92
$89.98
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$104.00
ALL FIRE
TEST
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEPT
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
< ■>
$1,903.49*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 2
CHECK#
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM.
OBJECT
P.O. #
130193
09/21/92
$498.68
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
8319
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
- - - - --
3550
< *>
$498.68*
130194
09/21/92
$11.10
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$47.12
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$55.12
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$142.02
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$44.79
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$224.25
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AUGUST
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$38.48
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
083192
GRILL
LAUNDRY
< *>
$562.88*
130195
09/21/92
$20.00
ANOKA COUNTY
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
082892
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
3300
< *>
$20.00*
130196
09/21/92
$65.03
ARROYO TIRE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
47462
RANGE
REPAIR PARTS
3279
< *>
$65.03*
130197
09/21/92
$10.00
ASIAN GANG INVESTIGA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
091492
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$10.00*
130198
09/21/92
$206.75
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
46190
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOO
3896
< *>
1
$206.75*
130199
09/21/92
$28.89
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
0826P2
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.89*
130200
09/21/92
$66.00
AWWA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
090492
DISTRIBUTION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$66.00*
130201
09/21/92
$13.18
AXT -LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
091092
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$13.18*
130202
09/21/92
$535.80
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
44703
ST. IMPROV BA
CIP
3852
< *>
$535.80*
130203
09/21/92
$186.00
BALCH, CAROL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
091592
POOL ADMIN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$186.00*
130204
09/21/92
$225.00
BARR ENG
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13636 -18
GENERAL STORM
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$871.96
BARR ENG
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
13637 -18
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$1,096.96*
130205
09/21/92
$475.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090292
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
3843
< *>
$475.00*
130206
09/21/92
$3,600.00
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
018576
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
1669
< *>
$3,600.00*
130207
09/21/92
$1,269.51
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
083192
GRILL
CST OF,GDS BE
09/21/92
$1,713.40
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF'GDS BE
09/21/92
$901.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$107.00
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$1,514.75
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$5,506.01*
A.
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. N
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130208
09/21/92
$100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PER$ SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130209
09/21/92
$46.50
BENSON OPTICAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
751852
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$46.50*
130210
09/21/92
$243.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
JULY /DUP
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
09/21/92
$262.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
JULY /DUP
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
09/21/92
$345.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
JULY /DUP
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
09/21/92
$219.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
AUG YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
09/21/92
$147.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
AUG /50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
09/21/92
$229.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
AUG /VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
< *>
$1,446.00*
130211
09/21/92
$15.49
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
813382
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLI
09/21/92
$74.50
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
813872
PARK ADMIN.
OFFICE SUPPLI
09/21/92
$4.41
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
813384
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLI
09/21/92
$10.22
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815264
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$7.05
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815264
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$8.30
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815264
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$122.99
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815264
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$30.74
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815264
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$3.14
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
815990
ASSESSING
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$66.09
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
816203
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLI
3881
< *>
$342.93*
1
130212
09/21/92
$34,233.55
BFI RECYCLING SYS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
090192
RECYCLING
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
534,233.55*
130213
09/21/92
$104.52
BFU SERVICE GROUP
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
2137214
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$104.52*
130214
09/21/92
$7,359.00
BHK &R
INSURANCE
1585
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$7,359.00*
130215
09/21/92
$1,883.06
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
BLACKTOP
062660
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
< *>
$1,883.06*
130216
09/21/92
$14.38
BLACK & DECKER
REPAIR PARTS
020 -4718
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3630
< *>
$14.38*
130217
09/21/92
$75.00
BLAIN, JUDY
SERVICES /ART CENTER
091192
ART SUPPLY GIF
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$75.00*
130218
09/21/92
$100.00
BLOOD DAVID
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
<*>
$100.00*
130219
09/21/92
$21.70
BOWLER, WILLIAM
MEETING EXPENSE
090992
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$21.70*
130220
09/21/92
$45.79
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
159245
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR'PARTS
3609
< *>
$45.79*
130221
09/21/92
$535.78
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
PAPER SUPPLIES
251756 .
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
09/21/92
- $248.19
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
PAPER SUPPLIES
CM252431
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
=-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130221
09/21/92
$1.08
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
PAPER SUPPLIES
252555
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
- - - -
09/21/92
$14.59
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
PAPER SUPPLIES
251756 -1
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
09/21/92
$5.38
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
PAPER SUPPLIES
253853
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
< *>
$308.64*
130222
09/21/92
$229.64
BROWNELLS INC
AMMUNITION
A281569
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
3449
< *>
$229.64*
130223
09/21/92
$1,586.25
BRW INC.
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
66122
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
< *>
$1,586.25*
130224
09/21/92
$85.91
BUSINESS RECD CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8792310
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$85.91*
130225
09/21/92
$100.00
BUTLER GEORGE
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130226
09/21/92
$247.68
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
140988
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
3080
09/21/92
$402.85
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
140989
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3373
09/21/92
$326.87
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
141084
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3509
09/21/92
$380.92
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
141096
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GO F00
3507
< *>
$1,358.32*
130227
09/21/92
$2,518.00
C.O. CARLSON AIR CON
CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT
4085
GOLF PROG
CLUB HOUSE EQ
1286
09/21/92
$3,440.00
C.O. CARLSON AIR CON
CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT
4173,
GOLF PROG
CLUB HOUSE EQ
1286
< *>
$5,958.00*
130228
09/21/92
$112,587.19
C.S. MCCROSSAN CONST
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -8
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
< *>
$112,587.19*
130229
09/21/92
$50.00
CALGREN, MEGAN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
083192
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$50.00*
130230
09/21/92
$149.80
CALLAHAN,FRAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
080292
PUBLIC HEALTH
MILEAGE
< *>
$149.80*
130231
09/21/92
$258.05
CARLSON PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55396
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$258.05*
130232
09/21/92
$121.45
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
082192/P
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$121.45*
130233
09/21/92
$249.78
CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPL
CRAFT SUPPLIES
14446
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
2816
< *>
$249.78*
130234
09/21/92
$383.80
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$120.30
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$504.10*
130235
09/21/92
$368.00
CITY OF ROBBINSDALE
MEETING EXPENSE
091492
CONTINGENCIES
MEETIN9 EXPEN
< *>
$368.00*
130236
09/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
35151
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
09/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
35152
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
09/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
35153
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 5
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
<*>
$40.50*
130237
09/21/92
$677.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
083192
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
09/21/92
$68.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
083192
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
09/21/92
$514.77
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$329.75
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$817.33
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$2,407.35*
130238
09/21/92
$142.00
COCKRIEL, VINCE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
081192
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$142.00*
130239
09/21/92
$250.00
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6469
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP REPLACE
3781
< *>
$250.00*
130240
09/21/92
$36.91
COMTECH INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
021076
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$36.91*
130241
09/21/92
3233.00
CRAGUNS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
091492
CIVIL DEFENSE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$233.00*
130242
09/21/92
$65.00
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
090392
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
1
$65.00*
130243
09/21/92
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS TIMOTHY J M
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OCTOPER
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
130244
09/21/92
$491.25
CURTIS 1000
FIRE PREVENTION
7050101
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRE PREVENTI
2385
< *>
5491.25*
130245
09/21/92
$64.90
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
55800
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
3677
< *>
$64.90*
130246
09/21/92
$179.85
DANIEL SMITH
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
63980
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3508
< *>
$179.85*
130247
09/21/92
$496.89
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
30445
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3625
< *>
$496.89*
130248
09/21/92
$842.40
DCA INC
HOSPITALIZATION
51124
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$842.40*
130249
09/21/92
$50.00
DIECKHAUS, KIP
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
090292
RESERVE PROGRA
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$50.00*
130250
09/21/92
$46.90
DPC INDUSTRIES
CHEMICALS
00927704
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
< *>
$46.90*
130251
09/21/92
$257.65
E -Z SHARP INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3354
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3853
< *>
$257.65*
f
130252
09/21/92
$128.29
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
0322867
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
3516
09/21/92
$242.22
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
0326700
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
3572
< *>
$370.51*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
- - - ---
-------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=---
130253
09/21/92
$91.94
E.A. SWEEN COMPANY
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
10725508
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD F00
3897
< *>
$91.94*
130254
09/21/92
$113.09
E.J. BROOKS COMPANY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
35425
ELECTION
GENERAL
SUPPL
3504
< *>
$113.09*
130255
09/21/92
$112.12
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
603504
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$345.31
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
603410
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$16.76
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
606015
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$110.68
EAGLE WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
606011
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
< *>
$584.87*
130256
09/21/92
$84.88
EARL F. ANDERSON
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
117753
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL
SUPPL
3456
< *>
$84.88*
130257
09/21/92
$10,502.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
09/21/92
$141.90
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$62.80
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$2,626.98
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS BE
09/21/92
$374.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
09/21/92
$7,316.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
< *>
$21,024.88*
130258
09/21/92
$85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE
CONTRACTS EQU
1936994
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$85.00*
130259
09/21/92
$71.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
30920
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS BE
09/21/92
$23.60
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
30945
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MI
< *>
$94.60*
130260
09/21/92
$12.00
EDINA SOUTHDALE PHYS
SAFETY
EQUIPMENT
082592
POLICE DEPT. G
SAFETY
EQUIPM
< *>
$12.00*
130261
09/21/92
$37.82
EGGE, EVELYN J
AMBULANCE FEES
090992
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE
FEE
< *>
$37.82*
130262
09/21/92
$58.96
ELECTRIC MOTOR REP.
REPAIR
PARTS
111912
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR
PARTS
3458
< *>
$58.96*
130263
09/21/92
$64.58
ELECTRONIC CENTER
REPAIR
PARTS
540700
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR
PARTS
3487
< *>
$64.58*
130264
09/21/92
$223.65
ENGLAND PRESS INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
52729
GRILL
GENERAL
SUPPL
3587
< *>
$223.65*
130265
09/21/92
$181.05
ENVIORMATIC CORP OF
SERVICE
CONT -RACTS EQU
41844
GRILL
SVC CONTR EQU
3621
< *>
$181.05*
130266
09/21/92
$109.50
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
15003
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
2961
< *>
$109.50*
130267
09/21/92
$30,400.00
FAIRWAY ARCHITECTS I
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
090992
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$30,400.00*
130268
09/21/92
$31.36
FAST i HOUR PHOTO
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
06658
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL
SUPPL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 7
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. # --
< *>
$31.36*
- - - -
130269
09/21/92
$29.25
FEDERAL EXPRESS
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
4- 756 -71
GC CIP
CIP
< ">
$29.25*
130270
09/21/92
$1,484.50
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL
185105
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
< *>
$1,484.50*
130271
09/21/92
$25.56
FERRELLGAS
CRAFT SUPPLIES
100668
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
3380
< ">
$25.56*
130272
09/21/92
$304.20
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
100111
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$304.20*
130273
09/21/92
$111.83
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
ALARM SERVICE
87499
ARENA BLDG /GRO
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$111.83*
130274
09/21/92
$3,358.00
FRANK B HALL & CO
INSURANCE
087558
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< ">
$3,358.00*
130275
09/21/92
$116.62
FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
2266
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
3299
< *>
$116.62*
130276
09/21/92
$98.84
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082192
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$382.32
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082112
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$779.49
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082192
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$285.62
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082192
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$486.48
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082192
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
09/21/92
$242.06
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
082192
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
09/21/92
$43.08
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
082192
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
< *>
$2,317.89*
130277
09/21/92
$2,090.71
G & T TRUCKING COMPA
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
70258
STREET RENOVAT
SAND,GRVL & R
09/21/92
$415.79
G & T TRUCKING COMPA
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
70259
STREET RENOVAT
SAND,GRVL & R
3813
09/21/92
$2,504.70
G & T TRUCKING COMPA
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
70260
STREET RENOVAT
SAND,GRVL & R
5146
< *>
$5,011.20*
130278
09/21/92
$4,505.77
G.L. CONTRACTING INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
29274
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3690
< *>
$4,505.77*
130279
09/21/92
$405.38
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12541016
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$405.38*
130280
09/21/92
$7.85
GLIMSDAHL, CINDY
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
090492
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
< ">
$7.85*
130281
09/21/92
$497.56
GOPHER OIL CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
466255
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3649
< *>
$497.56*
130282
09/21/92
$25.00*
GOVERNMENT TRAINING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
091492
INSPECTIONS
CONF &SCHOOL
130283
09/21/92
$480.00
GRAPP, JEAN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
091592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$480.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
- - - - --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130284
09/21/92
$46.34
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
REPAIR PARTS
104 -5147
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3533
09/21/92
$45.99
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
REPAIR PARTS
104 -5170
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
3309
09/21/92
$93.46
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
104 -3651
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3784
< *>
$185.79*
130285
09/21/92
$2,359.55
GUNDERSON BROTHERS C
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -6
SIDEWALKS
CIP
<*>
$2,359.55*
130286
09/21/92
$280.00
GUST, MARGARET
AC INSTRUCTOR
091592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$280.00*
130287
09/21/92
$105.00
GUY SPEAKER CO
REPAIR PARTS
9165
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$105.00*
130288
09/21/92
$299.12
H &L MESABI
ACCESSORIES
021020
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3628
< *>
$299.12*
130289
09/21/92
$127.80
HACH CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
843389
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
34.79
< *>
$127.80*
130290
09/21/92
$51.40
HALLMAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
135058
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3400
< *>
$51.40*
130291
09/21/92
$61,391.60
HARDRIVES
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -7
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
< *>
$61,391.60*
130292
09/21/92
$3,530.00
HARMON CONTRACT
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
3212516
BUILDING & GRO
CIP
<■>
$3,530.00*
130293
09/21/92
$26.88
HARMON GLASS
REPAIR PARTS
72001602
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3716
<r.-
$26.88*
130294
09/21/92
$450,000.00
HARRIS BANK
DUE FROM HRA
080392
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
09/21/92
$49,050.00
HARRIS BANK
DUE FROM HRA
080392
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
09/21/92
$360.00
HARRIS BANK
DUE FROM HRA
080392
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$499,410.00*
130295
09/21/92
$100.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
080692
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/21/92
$2,681.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
083192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/21/92
$4,394.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
083192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/21/92
$54,855.70
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
083192
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$62,030.70*
130296
09/21/92
$32.40
HEDGES, DIANA
CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE
091592
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
09/21/92
$68.98* HEDGES,
DIANA
OFFICE SUPPLIES /ART C
091592
ART CENTER ADM
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
130297
09/21/92
$42.06
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
083192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
09/21/92
$355.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
892
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$397.06*
130298
09/21/92
$59.90
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT
0175075
BUILDING & GRO
PAINT
3578
< *>
$59.90*
130299
09/21/92
$63.05
HOBART CORP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
997317
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 9
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$63.05*
130300
09/21/92
$90.10
HOFFERS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
189410
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
3654
< *>
$90.10*
130301
09/21/92
$100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130302
09/21/92
$4.26
HOOTENS
LAUNDRY
082192
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
< *>
$4.26*
130303
09/21/92
$864.00
HORWATH, TOM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090992
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$114.52
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
090992
TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$978.52*
130304
09/21/92
$410.82
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
5025
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
8536
09/21/92
$117.21
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
REPAIR PARTS
5041
METER REPAIR
REPAIR PARTS
8536
< *>
$528.03*
130305
09/21/92
$2,303.50
I -494 CORRODOR COMMI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
082592
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,303.50*
130306
Ob/21/92
$298.25
IMPULSE CONCEPTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3472 -2
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3902
< *>
$298.25*
130307
09/21/92
$79.45
INTERIOR COM SYS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
0392b6
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$79.45*
130308
09/21/92
$79.88
INTOXIMETERS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92009186
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
3679
< *>
$79.88*
130309
09/21/92
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130310
09/21/92
$40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
091592
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$40.00*
130312
09/21/92
$34.06
JERRYS HARDWARE
PRINTING
AUGUST
RECYCLING
PRINTING
09/21/92
$15.00
'JERRYS HARDWARE
PAINT
AUGUST
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
09/21/92
$42.15
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
AUGUST
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
09/21/92
$127.68
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
AUGUST
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
09/21/92
$162.43
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
AUGUST
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/21/92
$28.52
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$31.09
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
SIDEWALKS & PA
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$13.98
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
GUN RANGE
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$201.99
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$74.54
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$18.50
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$67.16
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$207.60
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERA4 SUPPL
09/21/92
$283.79
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$165.65
JERRYS HARDWARE
DUE FROM HRA
AUGUST
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
09/21/92
$35.68
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$28.75
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$32.85
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130312
09/21/92
$20.23
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$40.45
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$18.32
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$224.37
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$43.86
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$15.30
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$7.92
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$3.35
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$10.09
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$5.31
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AUGUST
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$1,960.62*
130313
09/21/92
$600.00
JEWISH WORLD
ADVERTISING OTHER
083192
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERT OTHER
2834
< *>
$600.00*
130314
09/21/92
$100.00
JOHNSON WALTER
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130315
09/21/92
$9.80
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART WORK SOLD
081592
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
09/21/92
$144.22
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE
081592
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
09/21/92
$15.38
JOHNSON, NAOMI
PRINTING /ART CENTER
081592
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
<*>
$169.40*
130316
09/21/92
$30.00
JOHNSON, RALPH
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
091092
ASSESSING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$30.00*
130317
09/21/92
$212.84
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
65052
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
3444
< *>
$212.84*
130318
09/21/92
$151.27
KAIRIES, WALTER OR D
AMBULANCE FEES
090992
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$151.27*
130319
09/21/92
$147.52
KAR PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
707515
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3593
< *>
$147.52*
130320
09/21/92
$77.75
KATTREH, ANN
OFFICE SUPPLIES
090892
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
<*>
$77.75*
130321
09/21/92
$66.00
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
024656
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
09/21/92
$10.33
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
02170247
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
2916
09/21/92
$14.89
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
028918
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
3518
09/21/92
$167.92
KNOX COMA CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
029391
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
3547
09/21/92
$12.77
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
029727
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3626
09/21/92
$63.67
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
029790
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3632
09/21/92
$125.11
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
029809
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
3637
09/21/92
$36.63
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030107
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3607
09/21/92
$311.93
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
030243
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3705
09/21/92
$7.22
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
030994
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3824
< *>
$816.47*
130322
09/21/92
$4,751.12
KOCH MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
0807593
STREET RENOVAT
ROAD Ott
1371
09/21/92
$4,730.27
KOCH MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
0811273
STREET RENOVAT
ROAD OIL
1371
09/21/92
$4,378.29
KOCH MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
0812469
STREET RENOVAT
ROAD OIL
1371
< *>
$13,859.68*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28
PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
. - -+
130323
- rr - - -- rrr--r-rr----rrrrrrrrrr-rr--rr.rrrr-rrrrrrr
09/21/92
$5,036.65
KUETHER DIST. CO.
r- rr-- _-- _---- r- ---- rrr-
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
r -r -r -r
AUGUST Y
rrrr r -r rrrrr
YORK SELLING
- -rte -- ---------
CST OF GDS BE
------
09/21/92
$3,230.00
KUETHER DIST._ CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$33.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$8,299.65*
130324
09/21/92
$2,366.38
KUNDE CO INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
092592
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$2,366.38*
130325
09/21/92
$740.00
LAKE RESTORATION
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3761
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3650
09/21/92
5354.00
LAKE RESTORATION
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3765
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
3650
< *>
$1,094.00*
130326
09/21/92
$126.00
LANCELLO, ED
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
092192
STREET REVOLVI
MILEAGE
<*>
$126.00*
130327
09/21/92
$109.00
LANIER WORLDWIDE
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
02540676
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$109.00*
130328
09/21/92
$372.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1802836
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
3259
09/21/92
$457.30
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1802837
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3260
09/21/92
$43.87
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1806781
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
3416
09/21/92
$43.57
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
1806780
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
3415
OV/21/92
$46.92
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1807374
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3414
09/21/92
$457.78
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1807373
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3414
< *>
$1,422.29*
1
130329
09/21/92
$36.51
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
083192
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$36.51*
130330
09/21/92
$1,547.24
LEITNER COMPANY
SOD & BLACK DIRT
090192
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
9292
< *>
$1,547.24*
130331
09/21/92
$38.00
LIMBECK, MARC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
091492
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$38.00*
130332
09/21/92
$810.00
LINDENSELSER LANDFL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
082892
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$810.00*
130333
09/21/92
$22.16
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
212137
COMMUNICATIONS
PHOTO SUPPLIE
09/21/92
$6.75
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
212079
COMMUNICATIONS
PHOTO SUPPLIE
< *>
$28.91*
130334
09/21/92
$3,784.09
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSI
09/21/92
$2,685.06
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSI
09/21/92
$2,808.08
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSI
09/21/92
$1.28
LOGIS
DUE FROM HRA
89227 89
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
09/21/92
$333.13
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSI
09/21/92
$333.14
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSI
09/21/92
$333.13
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
89227 89
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$10,277.91*
}
130335
09/21/92
$229.56
M & I IND SUPPLY
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
08398
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPM
3483
< *>
$229.56*
130336
09/21/92
$302.40
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
14899
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130336
09/21/92
$221.32
M AMUNDSON
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
14979
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
- - - - --
09/21/92
$410.62
M AMUNDSON
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
15062
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$340.76
M AMUNDSON
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
15136
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$454.24
M AMUNDSON
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
15154
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$417.16
M AMUNDSON
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
15199
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$2,146.50*
130337
09/21/92
$72.50
MAHA
DUES &
SUBSCRIPTIONS
082892
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$72.50*
130338
09/21/92
$100.00
MALMBERG, DAVID
PROFESSIONAL
SVC -
OT
083192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
130339
09/21/92
$64.10
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$3,387.80
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$7,376.45
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$55.65
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$22.60
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$6,234.96
MARK VII SALES
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$17,141.56*
130340
09/21/92
$296.71
MATSUSHITA SERVICE C
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
51147600
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3728
< *>
$296.71*
130341
09/21/92
$89.60
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
MILEAGE
OR ALLOWANCE
0910P2
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
< *>
$89.60*
130342
09/21/92
$103.05
MCGRAW HILL INC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
S2139494
PWKS ADMIN GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$103.05*
130343
09/21/92
$24.78
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR
PARTS
090192
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$24.78*
130344
09/21/92
$100.00
MERFELD -BERT
PERSONAL
SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130345
09/21/92
$474.45
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30839
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3463
09/21/92
$495.00
MERIT SUPPLY
ACCESSORIES
30859
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3486
09/21/92
$299.47
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
30872
PUMP & LIFT ST
PAINT
3525
09/21/92
$127.80
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30945
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
3606
09/21/92
$495.22
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30959
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3727
09/21/92
$267.04
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30955
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
3582
09/21/92
$494.16
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
31056
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPP
3878
< *>
$2,653.14*
130346
09/21/92
$2,772.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BUILDING PERMITS
AUGUST
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$2,772.00*
130347
09/21/92
$98.00
METZGER AQUATIC ENGI
SERVICE
CONTRACTS EQU
147
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$98.00*
r
130348
09/21/92
$100.00
METZGER, JUDY
RETAIL
SALES
091592
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$100.00*
130349
09/21/92
$329.00
MIDWEST AQUA CARE
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
080892
LAKES & PONDS
PROF SERVICES
1429
a
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 13
CHECK# DATE
-- - - - - -- —
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
-- - - - - --------------------------
DESCRIPTION INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. N
130349
------------------------------
09/21/92
$3,040.00
MIDWEST AQUA CARE
....................................
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
082792
AQUATIC WEEDS
...........
CONTR REPAIRS
4. -- - - - - --
-
1540
< *>
$3,369.00*
130350
09/21/92
$267.97
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1726
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$399.72
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1726
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$1,460.20
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8240
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
09/21/92
$282.74
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8240
PARKING LOTS
BLACKTOP
09/21/92
$1,654.29
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8240
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
<*>
$4,064.92*
130351
09/21/92
$64.11
MIDWEST BADGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
97671
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
2392
< *>
$64.11*
130352
09/21/92
$50.40
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
071692
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
2276
09/21/92
$116.40
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
081092
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
2276
< *>
$166.80*
130353
09/21/92
$301.04
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQU
REPAIR PARTS
2526
PONDS & LAKES
REPAIR PARTS
3701
< *>
$301.04*
130354
09/21/92
$18,111.00
MN DEPARTMENT OF REV
DUE TO OTHER GOVERMEN
090192
UTILITY PROG
DUE TO 0TH GO
< *>
$18,111.00*
130355
09/21/92
$846.00
MN DEPT OF
GASOLINE
AUGUST
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$846.00*
130356
09/21/92
$95.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36784
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$95.00*
130357
09/21/92
$139.02
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
6541
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
09/21/92
$56.28
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
6540
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
09/21/92
$1,946.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PRINTING
082992
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
< *>
52,141.30*
130358
09/21/92
$655.54
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
.598.50.
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
::$314.46
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,068.50*
130359
09/21/92
- $29.23
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
290608
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
09/21/92
$333.13
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
291155.
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3489
09/21/92
$31.37
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
291967
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3568
09/21/92
$146.22
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
291966
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
3568
09/21/92
$15.90
MN. TORO INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
292791
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3595
09/21/92
$31.48
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
293643
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
3660
09/21/92
$247.20
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
294088
GENERAL TURF C
REPAIR PARTS
3703
09/21/92
$84.11
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
294553
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$860.18*
130361
09/21/92
$296.40
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151789
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$407.08
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151788
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$394.75
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151787
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$394.75
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151786
GENERAL STORM
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$444.09
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151785
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$296.06
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151784
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130361
09/21/92
$264.39
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151783
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
- - - - --
09/21/92
$444.09
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151782
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$168.36
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151794
GENERAL STORM
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$567.46
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151792
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$419.23
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151791
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$419.43
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151790
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$143.69
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
151793
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$1 011.55
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
153284
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$296.06
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
153283
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
09/21/92
$188.03
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
153282
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
< *>
$6,155.42*
130362
09/21/92
$137.49
MOORE MEDICAL CORP
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
7113603
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
3292
< *>
$137.49*
130363
09/21/92
$45.00
MOTT, LUCY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311584
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3785
< *>
$45.00*
130364
09/21/92
$245.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
30380
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3798
09/21/92
$735.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030379
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$980.00*
130365
08/21/92
$149.10
NAME BRAND SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5782
METER READING
GENERAL SUPPL
3829
< *>
$149.10*
130366
09/21/92
$13.93
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
830198
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3617.
<*>
$13.93*
130367
09/21/92
$516.17
NATIONAL CAR RENTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
07612622
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$516.17*
130368
09/21/92
$185.37
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
528118
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
09/21/92
$494.99
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
527891
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$196.79
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
528117
VERNON OCCUPAN
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$877.15*
130369
09/21/92
$132.26
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
107462
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
9628
< *>
$132.26*
130370
09/21/92
$127.20
NEW PIG CORPORATION
BLUE PRINTING
510589
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BLUE PRINTING
2376
< *>
$127.20*
130371
09/21/92
$100.00
NISSEN DICK
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130372
09/21/92
$341.03
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
489470
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3513
09/21/92
$61.34
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
494790
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3661
< *>
$402.37*
130373
09/21/92
$635.00
NORTHLAND ELECTRIC S
GENERAL SUPPLIES
764848
METER REPAIR
GENERAL SUPPL
1348
< *>
$635.00*
f
130374
09/21/92
$440.52
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUG /YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$310.32
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$489.60
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 15
CHECK*
---------------
DATE
-
CHECK AMOUNT
- - - -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
-1,240 44-
- - - - -- --
130375
09/21/92
$746.21
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
083192
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
< *>
$746.21*
130376
09/21/92
$28.06
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
824
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT & POWER
09/21/92
$60.02
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
083192
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
09/21/92
$89.23
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
082892.
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
09/21/92
$106.23
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
091092
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
09/21/92
$7.03
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
090992
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT & POWER
< *>
$290.57*
130377
09/21/92
$418.08
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
199190
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
3506
< *>
$418.08'
130378
09/21/92
$45.00
NYSTROM, JUDD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311587
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3788
< *>
$45.00*
130379
09/21/92
$1,239.01
OFFICE PRODUCTS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
175591
ASSESSING
EQUIP REPLACE
3576
< *>
$1,239.01*
130380
09/21/92
$369.56
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32430
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
3501
09/21/92
$174.69
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32445
POLICE DEPT. 0
PRINTING
09/21/92
$425.25
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32458
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
3512
< *>
$969.50*
130381
09/21/92
$238.40
OLD DUTCH FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
082892
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$238.40*
130382
09/21/92
$374.63
ORR SCHELEN MAYERON
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
081292
GENERAL STORM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$374.63*
130383
09/21/92
$111.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
9069
CLUB HOUSE
CST OF GD F00
9041
< *>
$111.00*
130384
09/21/92
$37.17
PARAGON CABLE MPLS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
091492
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$37.17*
130385
09/21/92
$5.0.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
080592
POLICE DEPT. G
PHYS EXAMS
09/21/92
$50.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
081992
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHYS EXAMS
09/21/92
$50.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
082692
POLICE DEPT. G
PHYS EXAMS
< *>
$150.00*
130386
09/21/92
$21.76
PARTS SUPPLY CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
970 -3257
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
3657
< *>
$21.76*
130387
09/21/92
$27.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
26144
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$27.50*
130388
09/21/92
$19.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
083192
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
09/21/92
$1,470.30
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
083192
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
09/21/92
$194.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,683.30*
130389
09/21/92
$1,715.21
PERA
PENSIONS
090392
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 16
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$1,715.21*
130390
09/21/92
$19.62
PERA
PENSIONS
091692
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
< *>
$19.62*
130391
09/21/92
$75.00
PETERSON, DALE
SERVICES /ART CENTER
091192
ART SUPPLY GIF
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$75.00*
130392
09/21/92
$20.00
PETERSON, JENNIFER
SERVICES CL /EB
083092
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$20.00*
130393
09/21/92
$477.50
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1198
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3836
< *>
$477.50*
130394
09/21/92
$405.18
PLANT & FLANGED EQU
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3214
METER REPAIR
GENERAL SUPPL
3718
< *>
$405.18*
130395
09/21/92
$50.00
PODNIEKS, ERIC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
090292
RESERVE PROGRA
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$50.00*
130396
09/21/92
$215.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
090392
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$215.00*
130397
09/21/92
$2,632.00
POSTMASTER
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
ACCT 393
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
< *>
$2,632.00*
1
130398
09/21/92
$2,396.25
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3653
< *>
$2,396 25*
130399
09/21/92
$129.00
PRIME LEARNING INTER
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
331103
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
2391
<*>
$129.00*
130400
09/21/92
$108.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
76755
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$108.00*
130401
09/21/92
$194.64
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
CONCRETE
15757 -68
GENERAL MAINT
CONCRETE
< *>
$194.64*
130402
09/21/92
$3.63
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
606132
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$3.63*
130403
09/21/92
$33,526.45
PROGRESSIVE CONTRACT
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
P -3
PARKING /RAMP
CIP
< *>
$33,526.45*
130404
09/21/92
$113.97
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
045008
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
3865
< *>
$113.97*
130405
09/21/92
$36.90
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
016690
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3758
< *>
$36.90*
130406
09/21/92
$119.85
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
287569
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY'EQUIPM
09/21/92
$182.75
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
287569
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
09/21/92
$99.45
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
287569
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPM
< *>
$402.05*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 17
CHECK#
--- - -
DATE
- - -- ------
CHECK AMOUNT
- - - - -- -- ---------------------------
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
-
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
130407
09/21/92
$29.77
REGAN, JUNE
- - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SUPPLIES
091092
ASSESSING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.77*
130408
09/21/92
$358.10
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01830
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3839
<*>
$358.10*
130409
09/21/92
$5,511.17
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$18.15
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$7,850.06
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$130.30
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$146.40
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$5,436.75
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$19,092.83*
130410
09/21/92
$85.00
RICHARDS, BRIAN
PROFESSIONAL SVC -
OT
083192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$85.00*
130411
09/21/92
$17.58
RINGS & THINGS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
108402
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$17.58*
130412
09/21/92
$400.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
49860
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3770
< *>
$400.00*
130413
09/21/92
$925.10
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
1612
MAINT OF COURS
GASOLINE
9379
< *>
$925.10*
130414
09/21/92
$75.00
ROZYCKI, NANCY
PERFORM 10/29/92 EB
083192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
130415
09/21/92
$202.17
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
REPAIR PARTS
70686
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3412
( *>
$202.17*
130416
09/21/92
518.50
SANKEY, DIANE
LICENSES & PERMITS
091492
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
09/21/92
$10.28
SANKEY, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
091492
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$7.43
SANKEY, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
091492
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$36.21*
130417
09/21/92
$30.00
SANKEY, MOREAU J
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
091092
ASSESSING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$30.00*
130418
09/21/92
$123.36
SCAN AIR FILTER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
36619
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
3684
< *>
$123.36*
130419
09/21/92
$129.00
SCHMITT MUSIC
MUSIC SUPPLIES
931224
SPECIAL ACTIVI
MUSIC SUPPLIE
3900
< *>
$129.00*
130420
09/21/92
$331.88
SEELYE PLASTICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
227807
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3131
09/21/92
$73.39
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
229747
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
3612
09/21/92
$23.48
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
230057
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
3635
< *>
$428.75*
130421
09/21/92
$4,617.48
SEH
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14785
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,617.48*
130422
09/21/92
$100.00
SHEPARD JOHN
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 18
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$100.00*
130423
09/21/92
$28.04
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
0951 -7
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3240
09/21/92
$44.64
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1064 -8
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPL
3325
09/21/92
$45.09
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
1235 -4
PUMP & LIFT ST
PAINT
3340
09/21/92
$79.48
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1472 -3
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
3627
09/21/92
$17.01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1728 -8
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
3477
09/21/92
$104.30
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1881 -5
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPL
3528
< *>
$318.56*
130424
09/21/92
$275.73
SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT
PROTECTIVE
CLOTHING
127015
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
3289
09/21/92
$114.27
SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
127181
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
3290
< *>
$390.00*
130425
09/21/92
$36.00
SMIEJA, GARY
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
090992
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$36.00*
130426
09/21/92
$13,310.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$164.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$96.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$3,964.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST 5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$17,536.35*
130427
09/21/92
$59.02
SPS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1925695
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3613
09/21/92
$49.12
SPS
REPAIR
PARTS
1927614
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3646
< *>
$108.14*
130428
09/21/92
$194.60
ST CROIX RECREATION
REPAIR
PARTS
8465
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3909
< *>
$194.60*
130429
09/21/92
$1,145.70
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
PERSONNEL
083192
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
< *>
$1,145.70*
130430
09/21/92
$94.60
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROFESS
SERVICES -ENGI
69 -3100-
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC ENGIN
< *>
$94.60*
130431
09/21/92
$14.02
STERLING DRUG STORES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
083192
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$14.02*
130432
09/21/92
$1,238.99
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
5
ST. IMPROV BA
CIP
09/21/92
$837.39
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
6
ST. IMPROV BA
CIP
< *>
$2,076.38*
130433
09/21/92
$359.32
STS CONSULTANT LTD
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
06 -24944
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
< *>
$359.32*
130434
09/21/92
$28.36
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
172516
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$28.36*
130435
09/21/92
$1,875.00
SUBURBAN RATE
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
083192
SUB.RATE AUTH.
PROF SERVICES
<*>
$1,875.00*
130436
09/21/92
$34.37
SUPERAMERICA
GASOLINE
0144318
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$34.37*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 38
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P:.O. A
- -- - - - - -- -=---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------- 4.....--- _ - = - - - =.
130437
09/21/92
$102.00
SUSAN FRAME
PT OFFICE //ART CENTER
091592
ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES TEMP
09/21/92
$200.00
SUSAN FRAME
COST OF COMM/ART CENT
091592
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$302.00*
130438
09/21/92
$100.00
SWANSON HAROLD
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130439
09/21/92
$75.00
SWEENEY, VIRGINIA
RENTAL INCOME
082892
EDINB /CL PROG
RENTAL INCOME
< *>
$75.00*
130440
09/21/92
$217.77
SYSCO MN
CLEANING SUPPLIES
090192
GRILL
CLEANING SUPP
09/21/92
$3,089.51
SYSCO MN
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
090192
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
09/21/92
$320.24
SYSCO MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090192
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
<*>
$3,627.52*
130441
09/21/92
$6.76
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
083092
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$29.05
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090292
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$35.81*
130442
09/21/92
$479.25
TERRY ANN SALES CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090992
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
3588
< ">
$479.25*
130443
09/21/92
$155.40
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4237275
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
3842
< *>
$155.40*
130444
09/21/92
$245.96
THE MATHISON CO
07414588
7375b6
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
3774
< ">
$245.96*
130445
09/21/92
$484.00
THE PRINT SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19707
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
3447
< *>
$484.00*
130446
09/21/92
$283.50
THERMAL CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2081774
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL SUPPL
3608
< *>
$283.50*
130447
09/21/92
$13,176.63
THOMSEN- NYBECK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
64050
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$13,176.63*
130448
09/21/92
$9,956.70
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
09/21/92
$272.50
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$10,229.20*
130449
09/21/92
$1,232.00
TMI COATING INC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
JUNE
POOL CIP
CIP
< *>
$1,232.00*
130450
09/21/92
$190.00
TOIVONEN PAINTING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
090192
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$190.00*
130451
09/21/92
$42.48
TOLL COMPANY
TOOLS
191369
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
3326
< *>
$42.48*
130452
09/21/92
$123.54
TOOLS BY OLSEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
46155
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL' SUPPL
3665
< *>
$123.54*
130453
09/21/92
$224.00
TOWER TEE PRODUCTS
RANGE BALLS
3742
RANGE
RANGE BALLS
3867
<*>
$224.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 20
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130454
09/21/92
$230.05
TRAPSKIN, JAMES M
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
080892
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$230.05*
130455
09/21/92
$89.46
TURF SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
038649
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
2131
< *>
$89.46*
130456
09/21/92
$13.98
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
09/21/92
$28.94
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
AUGUST /V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$42.92*
130457
09/21/92
$70.00
TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
09137
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
3846
< *>
$70.00*
130458
09/21/92
$100.00
ULTAN, ROSLYE
SERVICES /ART CENTER
091192
ART SUPPLY GIF
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130459
09/21/92
$65.62
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14874400
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3464
09/21/92
$59.21
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19043300
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
3527
09/21/92
$255.92
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19644500
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
3583
< *>
$380.75*
130460
09/21/92
$10.70
UNITED WAY MINNEAPOL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
S4686
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$10.70*
130461
09/21/92
$26.04
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
0901 2
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$66.46
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
0901 2
BUILDING & GRO
TELEPHONE
< *>
$92.50*
130463
09/21/92
$235.00
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
SEPT
GENERAL STORM
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$52.43
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
DARE
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$118.49
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$3,801.96
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$170.73
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$110.71
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$17.30
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$533.03
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$61.60
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$114.75
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$274.99
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$54.60
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
GUN RANGE
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$226.65
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$587.53
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$16.06
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$17.18
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
09/21/92
$134.96
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
092192
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
< *>
$6,527.97*
130464
09/21/92
$114.88
VAN NOSTRAND REINHOL
BLUE PRINTING
5770193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BLUE PRINTING
3302
< *>
$114.88*
130465
09/21/92
$492.78
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
426773
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER 6UPPLIE
3855
< *>
$492.78*
130466
09/21/92
$660.18
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1111
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
3651
< *>
5660.18*
t
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 21
CHECKS
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
r
DESCRIPTION INVOICE
i...............•
PROGRAM OBJECT. P.O. •
130467
--- rrrr r......
09/21/92
.$65 32
.... r........r... .......................
VENDOR'S SUPPLY & SE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
361372
rr. rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ARENA CONCESSI
.rrrrr��rr�urr.rrrrr�r
CONTR REPAIRS
3778
< *>
$65.32*
130468
09/21/92
$288.88
VOTER REG /ELEC SECT
POSTAGE
5/5 -9/1
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
< *>
$288.88*
130469
09/21/92
$469.96
W.W. GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
495 -2613
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3425
09/21/92
$13.76
W.W. GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
495 -2654
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3540
09/21/92
$57.58
W.W. GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
498 -6546
PUMP & LIFT:ST
GENERAL SUPPL
3455
09/21/92
$10.21
W.W. GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270051 -8
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$551.51*
130470
09/21/92
$29.50
WAKNITZ, CINDY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
090492
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.50*
130471
09/21/92
$304.50
WALKER PARKING CONSU
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
66884
PARKING /RAMP
CIP
< *>
$304.50*
130472
09/21/92
$100.00
WALSH WILLIAM
PIRSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130473
09/21/92
$335.76
WARNER IND SUPPLY
TOOLS
1010054-
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
3544
< *>
$335.76*
130474
09/21/92
$8.82
WENDELL'S
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6450,1
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
09/21/92
$21.19
WENDELL'S
GENERAL SUPPLIES
64824
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
530.01*
130475
09/21/92
$237.50
WENDY ANDERSON ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
083192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
09/21/92
$285.00
WENDY ANDERSON ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
090992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$522.50*
130476
09/21/92
$45.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311583
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3011
09/21/92
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311588
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3786
09/21/92
$135.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311586
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3787
< *>
$270.00*
130477
09/21/92
$108.90
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
78195
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
3771
< *>
$108.90*
130478
09/21/92
$991.56
WHEELER LUMBER
SHARED MAINTENANCE
000384
MAINT OF COURS
SHARED MAINT
3183
< *>
$991.56*
130479
09/21/92
$480.00
WICKER, CYD
AC INSTRUCTOR
091592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$480.00*
130480
09/21/92
$262.67
WILLIAMS STEEL
ACCESSORIES
434263 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3410
< *>
$262.67*
130481
09/21/92
$62.00
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
66063
RANGE
REPAIR,PARTS
3280
< *>
$62.00*
130482
09/21/92
$168.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
11689
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$168.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP
16, 1992, 9:28 PM
page 22
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
130483
09/21/92
$45.82*
WRIGHT LINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3062973
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
130484
09/21/92
$100.00
WROBLESKI -HENRY
PERSONAL SERVICES
OCTOBER
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
130485
09/21/92
$174.48*
XEROX CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14766681
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL 3499
130486
09/21/92
$3,025.00
ZAHNER CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
R -92 -2
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,025.00*
130487
09/21/92
$75.65
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
54260871
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL 3073
< *>
$75.65*
$1,163,767.91*
0
0
I`
•
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:42 PM
page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
# 10
$706,012.96
FUND
# 11
$3,025.00
FUND
# 12
$2,949.79
FUND
# 15
$3,932.60
FUND
# 23
$4,778.40
FUND
# 26
$1,932.70
FUND
# 27
$53,579.80
FUND
# 28
$3,846.06
FUND
# 29
$136.33
FUND
# 30
$11,675.95
FUND
# 40
$45,268.29
FUND
# 41
$3,113.87
FUND
# 50
$108,789.12
FUND
# 60
$214,191.24
FUND
# 66
$535.80
$1,163,767.91-
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU,
SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
AUGUST HANDWRITTEN
CHECKS
page 1
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123192
08/03/92
$36.21
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
FERTILIZER
502310
MAINT
OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
08/03/92
$72.42
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
MULCH FOR PLANT
502843
MAINT
OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
< ■>
$108.63"
123197
08/03/92
$2,824.20
DELTA DENTAL
INSURANCE
080392
CENT
SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
<�>
$2,824.20-
123198
08/03/92
$1,807.19
FORTIS BENEFITS
INSURANCE
080392
CENT
SVC GENER
LNG TRM DISAB
<•>
$1,807.19"
123199
08/03/92
$19,180.60
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
080392
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
08/03/92
$5;053.33
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
080392
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< ->
$24,233.93-
123200
08/03/92
$28,892.93
PERA
PERA
080392
CENT
SVC GENER
PENSIONS
<�>
$28,892.93*
123201
08/03/92
$19.62
PERA
PERA
080392
CENT
SVC GENER
PENSIONS
<•>
$19.62"
123210
09/03/92
$342.27
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
593687
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
/03/92
-$3.42
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
593687
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
0 /03/92
$645.69
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
594075
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.46
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
594075
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,222.17
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
594077
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $12.22
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
594077
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$100.45
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
594109
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.00
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
594109
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$63.55
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
594110
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
594110
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID903
09/03/92
$63.55
EAGLE WINE.
LI19920817
594111
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92.
-$0.64
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
594111
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $76.38
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
66245
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.53
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
65245
YORK
SELLING.
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $12.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
66349
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $47.00
EAGLE WINE
L119920817
66349
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$0.47
EAGLE WINE
LI19920817
66506
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
<•>
$2,279.92-
123211
09/03/92
$84.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
20626
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$212.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
22004
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LIC903
09/03/92
-$4.26
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920817
22004
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903.
09/03/92
$249.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21913
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$80.10
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21914
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$114.74
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21915
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.29
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920817
21915
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$919.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
22005
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$510.19
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21922
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
- $10.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21922
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$67.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21718
YORK
SELLING
CST OF'.GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$487.55
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21630
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$1,518.71
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21940
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $30.37
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21940
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$603.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
22009
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$768.10
_ ED.PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21921
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU,
SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 2
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT.
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123211
09/03./92
$210.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
20679
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF-GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$809.40
ED PHILLIPS'&
SONS
LI19920817
22045
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$16.19
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
22045
VERNON. SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$719.10
ED PHILLIPS .&
SONS
LI19920817
21644
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
.$781.48
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
22010,
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$85.79
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21951
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.72
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21951
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$872.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920817
21950
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
L10903
<*>
$9,030.93"
123212
09/03/92
$5,315.49
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591793
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $106.31
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591793
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,386.74
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591794
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $67.73
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591794
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/9,2
$4,162.98
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591795
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $83.26
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
591795
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$79.53
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
592356
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.59_
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
592356
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,814.29
GRIGGS COOPER.&
CO.
LI19920817
594255
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $56.29
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594255
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,560.32
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594256
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ.LI0903
0
-$31.21
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594256
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
0/03/92
/03/92
$7;188.35
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594257
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $143.77
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594257
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,441.23
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594258
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $68.82
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
1I19920817
594258
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$97.46
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594276
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.95
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
594276
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $235.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
66337
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $117.95
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
66338
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $235.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920817
66339
YORK
SELLING
TRADE.DISCOUN
LI0903 .
< ■>
$26,895.71"
123213
09/03/92
$265.57
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566276
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$5.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566276
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $2.66
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566276
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$325.43
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566243
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566243
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
'I0903
09/03/92
-$3.27
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566243
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$92.26
JOHNSON WINE
CO :
LI19920818
7566268
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566268
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
-$0.90
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566268
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,366.92
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566250
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566250
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $27.34
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566250
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $43.15
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7536543
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903.
09/03/92
- $10.44
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7535552
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LID903
09/03/92
- $120.52
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7536550
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$7,513.16
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566680
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$41.58
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566680
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF,GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $150.27
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566680
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$709.78
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566698
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$12.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566698
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$7.11
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566698
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$420.18
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920818
7566672
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU, SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 3
CHECK#
-----=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. N
123213
09/03/92
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566672
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.20
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566672
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$149.65.
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566656
YORK SELLING -
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566656
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566656
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$850.15
JOHNSON
WINE CO..
LI19920818
756664
YORK:SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
756664
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
756664
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$515.08
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566227
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$10.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566227
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$5.15
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566227
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$278.34
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566185
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566185
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.80
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566185
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$443.84
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566193
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566193
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF-GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.44
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566193
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$123.39
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566219
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566219
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LID903
09/03/92
-$1.22
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566219
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,097.68
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566201
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
Q9/03/92
$16.56
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566201
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $61.97
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7566201
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $61.60
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
1451848
VERNON.SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.84
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920818
7521.115
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
< *>
$15,765.69*
123214
09/03/92
$119.80
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI10920818
25333
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920818
25333
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$135.90
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920818
25455
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920818
25455
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$102.95
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920818
25457
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920818
25457
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
< *>
$368.65*
123215
09/03/92
$180.85
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
592438
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.81
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119920818
592438
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$345..04
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818.
593643
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.45
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
593643
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$495.95
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
593645
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.96
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
593645
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$40.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
594196
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
594196
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$900.80
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
594251
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$9.01
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920818
594251
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
<•>
$1,943.01*
123216
09/03/92
$532.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015426
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $10.65
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015426
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,556.12
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015427
YORK SELLING
CST
OF,,GD LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
-$71.12
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015427
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,112.17
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015429
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $62.24
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015429
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$64.75
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015431
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.65
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920818
015431
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU, SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT .
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
- -- OBJECT-
-----------------
P.O. #
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123216
09/03/92
$1,166.04
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015538
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN.LI0903
09/03/92
- $11.66
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015538
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,008.18
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015557
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $20.08
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015557
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,311.37
QUALITY WINE
L119920818
015569
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$13.11
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015569
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$277.10
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
015866
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.77
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818_
015866
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $120.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
012732
VERNON SELLING.CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.20
QUALITY WINE
LI19920818
012732
VERNON.SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$11,717.08*
123217
08/17/92
$380.00
COURTNEY, C WAYNE
SERVICES
AUGUST
ADMINISTRATION
PROF.SERVICES
<*>
$380.00*
123218
08/17/92
$250.00
MADSON,JOHN
SERVICES
AUGUST
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$250.00"
123219
08/14/92
- $94,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
081492
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
08/14/92
$94,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
081492
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00"
123220
0*8/17/92
$18,480.12
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
081792
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
08/17/92
$4,847.69
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
081792
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< *>
$23,327.81*
123221
08/17/92
$19.62
PERA
PERA
081792
CENT SVC GENER.PENSIONS
< *>
$19.62*
123222
08/17/92
$28,641.36
PERA
PERA
081792
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
< *>
$28,641.36*
123223
09/03/92
$63.55
EAGLE WINE
L119920821
596096
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
596096
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$333.10
EAGLE WINE
L119920821
5960697
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.33
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
5960697
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$677.40
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
596175
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.77
EAGLE WINE
L119920821
596175
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$407.40
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
596177
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
-$4.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
596177
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$291.65
EAGLE WINE
L119920821
596178
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LID903.
09/03/92
-$2.92
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
596178
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$86.00
EAGLE WINE
L11.9920821
597335
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92'
=$0.86
EAGLE.WINE
LI19920821
597335
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$214.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
597336
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LIC903
09/03/92
-$2.14
EAGLE WINE
LI19920821
597336
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$2,052.37*
123.224
09/03/92
$319.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920821
19164
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$93.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920821
23664
YORK SELLING.
CST OF.GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$443.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920821
23890
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,191.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920821
23841
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$173.21
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920821
23663
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD'LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
-$3.46
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920821
23663
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
4508.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920821
23840
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
page 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123224
09/03/92
- 510.18
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23840
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$782.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23725
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,030.80
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
L119920821
23728
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$580.75
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23726
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,253.85
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23939
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$58.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23940
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.16
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23940
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LIC903
09/03/92
$710.87
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23938
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $14.22
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821.
23938
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$676.80
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23829
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903.
09/03/92
$176.85
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23660
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$58.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
24498
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$190.60
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23659
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$468.75
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23828
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$9.38
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19920821
23828
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$8,678.68*
123225
09/03/92
$4,282.25
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
L119920821
596758
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $85.65
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
596758
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$88.26
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
596759
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.77
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
596759
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
0q/03/92
$3,988.01
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
596761
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $79.76
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
L119920821
596761
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$474.64
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
597432
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD
L10903
09/03/92
-$9.49
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
L119920821
597432
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
.LIQ
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$64.94
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
597940
VERNON.SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-51.30
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
597940
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$745.23
GRIGGS COOPER & C0:
L119920821
596760
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $14.90
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
596760
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$829.50
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
L119920821
598024
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $16.59
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920821
598024
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< ■>
$10,263.37*
123226
09/03/92
$466.97
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594468
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$5.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594468
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.68
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594468
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$214.74
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594500
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$6.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594500
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.13
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594500
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$137.37
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119920821
7594450
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594450
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.38
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119920821
7594450
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$59.18
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594476
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST-OF
GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594476
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.18
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594476
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$582.77
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594484
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594484
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $11.65
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119920821
7594484
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$190.00
- JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594518
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.50
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594518
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF',GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.90
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594518
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$34.78
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119920821
7594492
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.50
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119920821
7594492
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.35
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594492
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
.$772.30
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19920821
7594583
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU,
SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123226.09/03/92
$15.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594583
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$7.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594583
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,715.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO..
LI19920821
7594559
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594559
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $34.31
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594559
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$189.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594542
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594542
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594542
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$95.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594534
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594534
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LIC903
09/03/92
-50:96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594534
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,227.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594526
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92.
$10.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594526
YORK SELLING
CST OF.GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $24.53
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594526
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903 ,
09/03/92
$444:99
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594575
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$12.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594575
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.46
JOHNSON
WINE.
CO.
LI19920821
7594575
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,195.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594567
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$10.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594567
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
- $11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594567
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$4,811.17
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594419
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
0$/03/92
$24.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594419
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $96.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594419
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$459.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594385
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594385
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.61
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594385
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$416.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594393
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92-
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
75943.93
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
-$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594393
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$409.06
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594443
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594443
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LIIS920821
7594443
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT.LID903
09/03/92
$210.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594435
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903 .
09/03/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594435
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119920821
7594435
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,123.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594401
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594401
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $42.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7594401
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO:
LI19920821
7564297
VERNON.SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$64.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7605405
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920821
7605405
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$15,690.20*
123227
09/03/92
$753.84
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595980
VERNON SELLING
CST.OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$7.54
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595980
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$721.64
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595981
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$7.22
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595981
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$40.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595994
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595994
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$40.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595995
VERNON SELLING
CST OF10D WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
595995
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$683.59
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
596058
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$7.11
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119920821
596058
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.06
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
66798
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
$0.08
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
66799
YORK SELLIN G
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU, SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 7
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123227
09/03/92
-$8.06
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
66800
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.08
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
66800
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
<*>
$2,200.44*
123228
09/03/92
$634.45
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016597
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
L20903
09/03/92
- $12.69
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016597
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,154.87
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016598
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $23.10
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016598
YORK SELLING
CASH,DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$686.85
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016815
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-56.87
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016815
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,622.05
QUALITY
LI19920821
016825
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- 416.22
.WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016825
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92'
$32.64
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016953
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.33
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016953
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$777.20
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017082
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $15.54
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017082
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$310.88
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017083
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.22
QUALITY WINE
L•I19920821
037083
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,464.98
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017274
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $29.30
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017274
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,147.14
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017339
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $42.94
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017339
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$3,914.82
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017343
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $78.30
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017343
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,497.09
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016799
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $14.97
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016799
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
51,165.80
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017081
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $23.32
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017081
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$93.90
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017344
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.94
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017344
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$5,055.85
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016599
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $101.12
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
016599
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,092.48
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017762
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $21.85
QUALITY WINE
LI19920821
017762
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $36.00.
QUALITY WINE
CREDIT
2333
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
09/03/92.
$0.36
QUALITY WINE
016482
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
<*>
$21,221.65*
123229
09/03/92
$304.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19920821
2916
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.55
SALUD AMERICA
LI19920821
2916
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
<*>
$306.55*
123230
09/03/92
$547.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
1920
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.50
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19920821
1920
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0903
< *>
$551.50*
123231
09/03/92
$70.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19920821
3041
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
WINE, MERCHANTS
LI19920821
3041
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
< *>
$73.00*
123233
09/03/92
$67.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598537
50TH ST SELLIN
S
CST OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.68
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598537
50TH.ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$166.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598538
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598538
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$404.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598579
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------
123233
09/03/92
-$4.04
EAGLE WINE
L119920826
-----------------------------------------------
598579
.50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$675.84
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598581
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.76
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
598581
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$33.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
599229
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.34
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
599229
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$689.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
599329
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.90
EAGLE WINE
L119920826
599329
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $188.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
67122
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.88
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
67122
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.33
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
66788
50TH ST SELLIN
CST.OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$0.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19920826
66788
50TH ST SELLIN-CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
<•>
$1,827.00"
123234
09/03/92
$535.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25945
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$718.41
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25944
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$14.37
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25944
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$325.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26012
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$213.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS.
LI19920826
25870
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$.737.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25875
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$180.55
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26013
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
0Q/03/92
-$3.61
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26013
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$110.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920826
25908
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25908
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$737.96
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920826
2595Q
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
- $14.76
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25950
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$908.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920826
25732
YORK SELLING
CST. OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$286.76
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $5.66
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $286.76
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$5._66
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$282.96
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$5.66
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26586
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$312.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
26014
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$31.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25976
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LID903
09/03/92
$899.32
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25975
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $17.99
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25975
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$527:80
ED PHILLIPS&
SONS
LI19920826
25911
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$99.7.70
ED PHILLIPS&
SONS
1119920826
25819
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$728.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920826
25622
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
< ■>
$8,193.21"
123235
09/03/92
$111.70
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
597941
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10903
09/03/92
-$2.23
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
597941
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$156.60
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920821
598347
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.13
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
598347
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$39.15
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
598348
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LID903
09/03/92
-$0.78
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
59.8348
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$156.60
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119920827
598349
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.13
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119920827
598349
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$3,167.36
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119920827.
599305
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LID903
09/03/92
-$63.35
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
599305
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$4,031.43
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
599306
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $80.63
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920827
599306
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$4,587.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119920827
599307
YORK.SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123235
09/03/92
- $91.75
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599307
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
- - - - --
LI0903
09/03/92
$460.35
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599963
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$9.21
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599963
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$305.10
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
600415
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-56.10
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
600415
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $4,587.00
GRIGGS
COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599307
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$91.75
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599307.
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$4,587.43
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599307
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $91.75
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19920827
599307
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
<�>
$12,755.41•
123236
09/03/92
$177.17
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621659
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621659
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-51.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621659
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$248.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621618.
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621618
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621618
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH .DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$101.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621642
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621642
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621.642
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,638.51
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621634
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
0,9/03/92
$9.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621634
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $32.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621634
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,603.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621626
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$11.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621626
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $32.06
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621626
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$435.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7630957
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.71
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7630957
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
4273.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621592
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621592.
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LID903
09/03/92
-$2.72
JOHNSON
WINE.CO.
LI19920827
7621592
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$438.55
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621600
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621600
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621600
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$211.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621568
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621568
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621568
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID903
09/03/92
$107.44
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621550
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621550
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621550
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,333.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621576
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$10.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621576
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $26.66
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621576
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,873.27
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621584
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$15.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621584
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $57.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621584
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903.
09/03/92
$5.,316.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621709
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$25.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621709
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $106.35
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621709
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$272.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621725
YORK SELLING
CST OF',GD WIN
LI0903.
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621725
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621725
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$337.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621741
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$7.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
.7821741
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
=33.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19920827
7621741
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903 .
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU, SEP 17,
1992, 2:31 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123236
09/03/92
$1,527.29
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621691
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621691
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $30.55
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621691
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$457.90
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621683
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621683
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.60
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621683
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $30.45
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7593148
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$196.45
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621667
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI1992082.7
7621667
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.93
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621687
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$47.58
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621675
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621675
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.48
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621675
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$147.95
- JOHNSON
WINE CO.
L119920827
7621717
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621717
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.96
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621717
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$80.04
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621733
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO..
L119920827
7621733
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.80
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
7621733
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT.LI0903
09/03/92
- $12.37
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920827
X7454289
50TH
.ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
< *>
$17,587.76*
123237
09/03/92
$127.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119920827
25712
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920827
25712
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$316.90
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920827
25733
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920827
25733
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$181.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920827
25735
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19920827
25735
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
< *>
$635.90*
123238
09/03/92
$40.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
598527
YORK.SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $0.40.
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
598527
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$509.86
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
598563
YORK
SELLING.
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$5.10
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
598563
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903.
09/03/92
$574.59
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
599315
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$5.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
599315
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$176.10
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
599317
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
L10903
09/03/92
-$1.76
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920827
599317
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
<A>
$1,287.54*
123239
09/03/92
$387.94
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
018783
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.88
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
018783
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,471.56
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019322
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $29.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019322
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,349.51
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019323
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
= $46.99
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019323
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,559.90
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019338
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
451.20
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019338
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$268.02
QUALITY
WINE
LI19.920827
019436
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$5.38
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019436
YORK
SELLING,
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$90.98
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019341
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.91
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019341
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,291.87
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019362
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $12.92
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019362
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,272..95
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920827
019365
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD.WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123239
09/03/92
- $22.73
QUALITY WINE
LI19920827
019365
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID903
09/03/92
$1,305.97
QUALITY WINE
LI19920827
019368
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $13.06
QUALITY WINE
LI19920827
019368
50TH ST.SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $42.95
QUALITY WINE
LI19920827
018095
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19920827
018095
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
<�>
$11,769.70'
123240
08/28/92
$55,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
082892
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
08/28/92
- $55,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLLTRANSFER
082892
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< ■)
$0.00 "'
123242
08/28/92
$433 -.50
COMM LIFE INS
CO.
LIFE INSURANCE
082892
CENT SVC GENER
LIFE INSURANC
08/28/92
$433.35
COMM LIFE INS
CO.
LIFE INSURANCE
082892
CENT SVC GENER
LIFE INSURANC
08/28/92
$245.93
COMM LIFE INS
CO.
ADJUSTMENT
082892
CENT SVC GENER
LIFE INSURANC
<•>
$1,112.78"
123243
08/31/92
$28,495.58
PERA
PERA
083192.
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
08/31/92
$19.62
PERA
PERA
083192
CENT SVC GENER
PENSIONS
<�>
$28,515.20"
129545
08/31/92
$23,078.31
FIDELITY BANK
FICA /MEDICARE
083192
GENERAL-FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< ■>
$23,078.31"
129546
09/03/92
$33.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601583
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.34
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601583
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$235.65
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601584
- VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.36
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601584
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID903
09/03/92
$33.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601585
YORK SELLING
CST.OF GD WIN 'LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.34
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601585
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$749.05
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601627
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $7.49
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601627
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$677.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601645
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$6.78
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601645
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$819.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601647
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.20
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
601647
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $64.94
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
67248
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$1.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19920902
67248
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
< -k >
$2,460.75"
129547
09/03/92
$33.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28191
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$91.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28084
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.82
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28084
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$114.74
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28190
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.29
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28190
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$425.21
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28065
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28065
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$582.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28113
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$189.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
27863
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$656.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28085
.50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$603.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28004
YORK SELLING
CST OF!.GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$720.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
27927
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$947.85
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28068
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $18.96
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28068
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$85.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28115
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28115
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129547
09/03/92
$260.05
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28005
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$684.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119920902
27886
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$180.36
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28123
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.61
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28123
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$479.31
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28093
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03192
-$9.59
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28093
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,305.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
27961
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$724.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28028
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$112.69
ED PHILLIPS&
SONS
LI1.9920902
28828,
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD.LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $2.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19920902
28828
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$8,147.59*
129548
09/03/92
$3,988.57
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601834
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $79.77
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO:
LI19920902
601834
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$643.48
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601835
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $12.87
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601835
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,193.57
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.,
LI19920902
601836
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $23.87
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601836
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$5,308.19
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601837
YORK SELLING.
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $106.16
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
601837
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$232.56
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119920902
602515
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.65
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19920902
602515
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$11,139.05*
129549
09/03/92
$88.93
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650286
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650286
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.88
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650286
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$189.93
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650294
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650294
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LIC903
09/03/92
-$1.90
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650294
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,844.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650278
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$10.50
JOHNSON.WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650278
50TH ST .SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $36.90
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650278
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$406.79
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650260
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.00
JOHNSON WINE.CO.
LI19920902
7650260
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.07
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650260
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$465.38
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650310
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$4.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650310
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.65
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650310
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$251.21
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650336
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$8.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650336
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$2.51
JOHNSON'WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650336
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,099.86
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650328
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
$6.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650328
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$22.01
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650328
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$819.25
JOHNSON, WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650344
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903.
09/03/92
$15.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650344
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.18
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
L119920902
7650344
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$72.75
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7660772
YORK SELLING
CST
OF.GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$1.46
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7660772
YORK SELLING"
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$34.78
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650229
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$0.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650229
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.35
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650229
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10903
09/03/92
$189.17
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
L119920902
7650237
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903 .
09/03/92
$5.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19920902
7650237,
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
COUNCIL-CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM
page 13
CHECK*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. t
129549.
09/03/92
-$1.88
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650237
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$357.58
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650245
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$7.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650245
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.56
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650245
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$5,133.66
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650211
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
$28.96
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650211
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
.09/03/92
09/03/92
- $102.70
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650211•
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$478.20
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650203
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$6.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650203
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$4.79
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19920902
7650203
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$11,339.11*
129550
09/03/92
$339.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601249
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$3.39
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601249
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$833.81
PRIOR WINE.COMPANY
LI19920902
601256
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.34
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601256
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$825.32
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601257
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$8.25
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601257
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$34.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601687
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$0.34
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19920902
601687
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$2,012.21*
129551
09/03/92
$2,274.04
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020736
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $22.74
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020736
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92,
$1,495.04
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
0207'43
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
- $14.95
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020743
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,029.61
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020969
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $20.59
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020969
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$947.20
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020987
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $18.94
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020987
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
$1,120.88
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
021030
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
-$11.21
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
021030
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
09/03/92
- $120.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020430
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$2,345.13
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020980
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0903
09/03/92
- $46.90
QUALITY
WINE
LI19920902
020980
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0903
< *>
$8.956.57*
129552
09/03/92
$88.00
THE WINE
COMPANY
LI19920902
2333
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
09/03/92
$3.00
THE WINE
COMPANY
LI19920902
2333
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0903
< *>
$91.00*
$390,453.13*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:34 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------
FUND # 10 $162,472.95
FUND # 27 $108.63
FUND # 30 $630.00
FUND # 50 $227,241.55
$390,453.13"
w