Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-21_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of September 8, 1992 * II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. PROCLAMATION - Disability Employment and Awareness Month II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pdss. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval - PRD -2 Planned Residence District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District for Vernon Hill Addition - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway, south of Vernon Av and west of Gleason Rd III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. New Nine Hole Golf Course - Braemar (Continue 10/5/92) * B. 50th & France Pedestrian Lights Agenda Edina City Council September 21, 1992 Page 2 V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Amendment of Council Minutes of July 6, 1992 B. Normandale Golf Course Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Findings of Fact C. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 15, 1992 D. Thielen Av/Wood End In Access E. Metro 2015 F. Appointment of Election Judges - General Election 11/03/92 VI. PETITIONS /COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition for Street Lighting - Valley View Road & Moccasin Valley Rd Residents B. Memorandum Regarding Traffic Speed - Trillium Ln and Lantana Ln Residents C. Scott Harr Letter - Aircraft Noise VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. Hennepin County Milfoil Control Program VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL I%. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 09/21/92: Total $1,163,767.91 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 09/17/82: $390,453.13 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Oct 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Oct 19 Regular Council Meeting Mon Nov 2 Regular Council Meeting Tues Nov 3- GENERAL /CITY ELECTION Mon Nov 16 Regular Council Meeting Mon Nov 30 Truth in Taxation Hearing - 1993 Budget 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Polls Open 8 :00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. Council Chamber. o o \`CO�IAAA t// P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, there are more than 600,000 people with disabilities in Minnesota, making them the largest minority group in the State; and. WHEREAS, many people with disabilities are living independently in Minnesota and are participating in education,.social, religious, recreational and community activities; and WHEREAS, residents of our community need to become more aware of the talents and capabilities of people with disabilities through their inclusion in the total community environment; and WHEREAS, the continuing existence of unfair discrimination and prejudice denies people with disabilities the chance to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities for which our free society is justifiably famous; and WHEREAS, a significant effort is being made statewide to eliminate barriers to employment, housing, transportation, education and public accommodations for persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has recognized employment as a major issue for persons with disabilities and has designated the month of October as National Disability Awareness Month; and WHEREAS,,the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act require employers to make reasonable accommodation to the known disability of a qualified applicant or employee. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Peggy Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of Edina, do hereby proclaim the month of October, 1992, to be: DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT AND AWARENESS MONTH in the City of Edina, Minnesota. . ADOPTED this 21st day of September, 1992. 1 MAYOR PRO -TEM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Richards. Commissioner Smith entered the meeting at 7:03 P.M. after adoption of the Consent Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve HRA Minutes of August 17, 1992. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR DEED AMENDED - CENTENNIAL LAKES Executive Director Hughes presented the following background information on the Centennial Lakes development project: Overview of Project The Redevelopment Agreement and the Contract for Deed for the Centennial Lakes development closed in October of 1988. The Redevelopment Agreement was executed by the HRA and South Edina Development Corporation (SED). A Contract for Deed was executed by the HRA and the estate of Fred W. Hedberg (Hedberg). The Redevelopment Agreement dealt primarily with Phase 1 of the Centennial Lakes project which included a multi- screen movie theater, a medical building, a retail plaza, an assisted condominium development, and a 250,000 square foot multi- tenant office building. At this time, all Phase 1 private improvements have been completed (or are nearly complete) with the exception of the 250,000 square foot office building. All Phase 1 public improvements (acquisition and initial development of Central Park and North Park and abutting roadways) have been completed. In connection with Phase 1, the Redevelopment Agreement with SED required the payment of City dedication fees of $3 million of which $1.6 million has been paid. The remaining $1.4 million is due in one month. These payments were guaranteed by Northland Land Company, an affiliate of SED. The Redevelopment Agreement also provided for a payment of $1 million in 1995 and an additional payment of $1 million in 1998. The 1995 and 1998 payments were not guaranteed to the same extent as the initial $3 million payment. SED and the HRA also executed a shortfall agreement whereby SED guaranteed a minimum amount of taxes from the Phase 1 private improvements. The shortfall agreement provided that if taxes are not generated in the minimum amount, SED or its guarantor, Northland Land Company, would make up the difference. The Contract for Deed between the Hedbergs and the HRA required the annual payment of principal and interest commencing in 1988. The Redevelopment Agreement with SED required that SED make all payments required by the Contract for Deed. A payment was made on the contract in 1989, however, payments due in 1990 and in 1991 have not been made (the 1990 payment had been deferred by Hedberg in consideration of the 1989 payment). Current Situation - The final installment of the initial City dedication is due in approximately one month. The amount of this installment is $1.4 million plus approximately $200,000 in interest and payment of this installment is guaranteed by Northland Land Company. The assets of Northland Land Company are primarily real estate holdings in Mendota Heights and Eagan. - SED, and therefore the HRA, are technically in default of the Contract for Deed due to the non - payment of the installment due in 1991. It is very doubtful that SED will pay the next installment due in approximately one month. No notice of default has been issued by Hedberg and, in staff's opinion, cancellation of the Contract for Deed by Hedberg is not imminent. - According to the approved development plan, the majority of Phase 2 Centennial Lakes developments are office uses. The office market continues to be depressed and the realization of a major office statement south of 76th Street is unlikely for the near term. Less intensive office developments are much more likely. - Based upon the market for high- density office development, the payment of the additional City dedication fees due in 1995 and 1998 are not feasible in SED's judgement. Therefore, in consideration of the payment of the $1.4 million plus interest which is due in October 1992, SED has requested relief from the payments due in 1995 and 1998. Proposed Amendments Based upon the current situation, staff, SED and Hedberg have negotiated the following amendments: Amendment to Contract for Deed The proposed amendment to the Contract for Deed contains the following major elements: 1) The current interest rate on the unpaid principal balance is nine percent. The amendment eliminates the interest provision and in its place provides for a payment in lieu of interest whenever a principal payment is made. The payment in lieu of interest is based upon the increase in the Consumer Price Index. This change effectively reduces the interest rate from nine percent to approximately three percent under current conditions. 2) The amendment eliminates the requirement to purchase land intended for residential purposes along with land intended for office purposes. Given the current real estate environment, such a requirement is no longer necessary. 3) Land which is subject to the Contract for Deed is currently exempt from real estate taxes. The contract, however, provides that if such land becomes taxable, the HRA is liable for the payment of such taxes. The HRA, in turn, has passed that obligation on to SED. The amended Contract for Deed provides that the HRA is not liable for the payment of taxes which could result from a third party decision (the Court or the County) that the property no longer qualifies for tax exempt status. 4) SED currently owns fee title to the lot for the Phase 1 office building. The amended Contract for Deed permits the swapping of land on a square foot per square foot basis between the Phase 1 office lot and land subject to the Contract for Deed. 5) The amended contract provides for the grant of a storm sewer easement across the contract property which was inadvertently omitted from the original contract. Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement and Shortfall Agreement The proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement and Shortfall Agreement contains the following major elements: 1) The amendment recognizes that the office development may utilize a less intensive development than originally planned. 2) The existing Redevelopment Agreement gives the HRA absolute authority over the transfer of the Phase 1 office parcel to any other developer. The amended contract provides that the HRA still retains authority over such transfers but must be reasonable in exercising its authority. 3) The $1 million payments due in 1995 and 1998 have been eliminated. Instead, City dedication fees would be required in connection with developments on the following basis: A. For residential developments: the greater of $.30 per square foot of land area or $800 per dwelling unit. B. For commercial developments: the greater of $.65 per square foot of land area or $1.00 per square foot of net rentable floor area. Based upon this formula, the City would receive a minimum dedication of approximately $500,000. If the balance of Centennial Lakes were completed as envisioned by the Master Plan, the City would receive approximately the $2 million that was first envisioned. Such payments would be made only in connection with development that actually occurs. 4) The Shortfall Agreement has been amended to provide that any development, except assisted condominium units, undertaken by the developer anywhere on the Phase 2 Centennial Lakes site, constitutes a credit against the developer's shortfall liability. Under the present agreement, only development which occurs on the Phase 1 office site acts as a credit. Reasons for Approval of Amendments 1) The prospects for the development of Phase 2 of Centennial Lakes are significantly different than they were in October of 1988. The Contract for Deed and the Development Agreement must more accurately reflect today's development environment. In this respect, the City contribution .! requirements provide a method whereby the City will receive, at a minimum, a traditional parkland dedication and at a maximum the fees that we bargained for in 1988. 2) The current developer is in the best position to accomplish the further development of this property. 3) The prospects of collecting on the shortfall agreement (if required) is much greater if the obligor on such payments remains the current developer. 4) The HRA's position, with respect to the Contract for Deed and the future acquisition of Phase 2 Centennial Lakes properties is improved. 5) The City is assured of receiving the $1.4 million plus interest payment which is due in October. Based on these reasons, staff would recommend that the HRA approve the amendments to the Contract for Deed and the Redevelopment Agreement. Following discussion and questions on the proposed amendments, Commissioner Kelly moved adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLUTION AMENDING REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SHORTFALL AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL LASES BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (BRA) hereby approves the amendment, as presented, to the Redevelopment Agreement and the amendment as presented to the Shortfall Agreement for Phase 1 Centennial Lakes, dated September 30, 1998, and executed by the BRA and South Edina Development Corporation (SED); BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman and Secretary of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) be authorized and directed to execute the amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement and the amendment to the Shortfall Agreement. RESOLUTION AMENDING CONTRACT FOR DEED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (BRA) hereby approves the amendment, as presented, to the Contract for Deed, dated October 3, 1988, and executed by the BRA and the estate of Fred W. Hedberg (Hedberg); BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman and Secretary of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (BRA) be authorized and directed to execute the amendment to the Contract for Deed. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. *CIAINS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve payment of the following BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 3,.1992, and consisting of one page totalling $53,720.23. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director HRA COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:44 PM COUNCIL DATE 9/21%92 page 1 CHECK #.. DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR rrrrrr• r• rrrrrr rrrrr r• rrrrrrr••• „....DESCRIPTION. INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT.— a.rr•rrrrftr rirrrrrrrrriYrrr ...... 12305 •rrr•rrrrr•r•rr 09/21/92 r•• $3,751.00 rr••• ALDO INC r• rrrrrr •rrrr�rrL��.r••rr•rr•.biir RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME 017389 CENTENNIAL LAK rrr- rrrrr.rrrr'- RESID IMPROVE < *> $3,751.00* 12306 09/21/92 $365.77 BRW INC. PROF FEES ARCH AND EN 66335 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH/ < *> $365.77* 12307 09/21/92 $21.00 BYRNE, TRUDIE PARKING PERMITS 122 50TH STREET PARKING PERMI < *> $21.00* 12308 09/21/92 $15,135.83 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS 0724 GRANDVIEW MISC <*> $15,135.83* 12309 09/21/92 $869.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY PROFESSIONAL FEES LEG 289743 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG/ < *> $869.50* 12310 09/21/92 $8,062.01 MILLER & SCHROEDER I INTEREST OTHER 091092 CENTENNIAL LAK INTEREST OTHE < *> $8,062.01* 12311 09/21/92 $7,200.00 NORDQUIST SIGN COMPA PARKS 15361 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $7,200.00* 12312 09/21/92 $1,796.42 PRIOR LAKE AGG. PARKS 081792 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $1,796.42* $37,201.53* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:36 PM FUND • 01 $37,201.53 $37,201.53• u page 1 G 0 e i v o . a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item- II. A. From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent El Information Only F Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: Z-92-2-and S-92-2, (� To Council Planned Residence Action ❑Motion District PRD -2 , to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. Ver", x I Resolution non Hill, David Carlson Compaay. Company. 5Z Ordinance ❑Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed rezoning Iand subdivision. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report. The Planning Commission approval is conditioned on the granting of the proposed front street setback variances by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The variances will be considered by the Board at its October 1, 1992, meeting. LOCATION MAP �E * �d . �` ■Ins REZONING & SUBDIVISION N.0 M B ER Z -92 -2 and S -92 -2 L O C A T 10 N South of Vernon Avenue and north of Vernon Court REQUEST Rezoning , PRD -2 , Planned Residence District to R-2, Double.Dwelling Unit District and Plat Approval. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF- THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 1992 7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair, J. Palmer, N. Faust, Johnson, H. McClelland, D. Workinger, C. Ingwalson, D. Byron MEMBERS ABSENT: G. Johnson, V. Shaw STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: R. Hale, L. Runyan, G. Commissioner Ingwalson moved approval of the August 29, 1992, meeting minutes. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: Z -92 -2 Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Residence District PRD -2, to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District and S -92 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval, Vernon Hill Addition - David Carlson Company, Inc. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property measures slightly over four acres in size and is vacant. The. development tract contains two parcels and includes all remaining vacant property fronting on Vernon Court. Mr. Larsen added a petition to rezone the property to R -2 and plat eight double bungalow lots has been presented for approval. Mr.__ Larsen explained the R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District requires a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. The eight proposed lots all exceed 90 feet in width and range in area from 20,100 to 22,350 square feet in area. Mr. Larsen stated all lots meet or exceed zoning ordinance requirements for R -2 lots. Mr. Larsen pointed out the R -2 district requires a minimum front street setback of 30 feet. Mr. Larsen said the conceptual site plan submitted by the developer illustrates front street setbacks ranging from approximately 20 feet to 35 feet with most units providing a 25 foot setback. Thus, five and 10 foot front setback variances are suggested. The reduced front setback is suggested to minimize the impact on steep slopes and reduce the height of required retaining walls. Mr. Larsen told the commission the proposed setback variances must be considered by the Zoning Board of Appeals in a separate action. Mr. Larsen explained that the site plans and unit plans were _submitted to show the developers intentions and are not requirements of the requested zoning. The subject property is designated as suitable to low density attached residential by the City Comprehensive Plan. Double bungalow development is consistent with this designation. During the past several years three different development proposals have been approved for the westerly 3.2 acres of this tract. In 1986, a rezoning to PRD -3 was approved for a 15 unit townhouse development. In 1987, a five lot, 10 unit double bungalow development was approved. Most recently, a 12 unit, PRD -2 development was approved in the summer of 1990. All of these developments were consistent with the six unit per acre density allowed by the low density attached residential classification of the property. Mr. Larsen reminded the commission previous proposals on this property were complicated by pending tax forfeiture actions. The property has since gone tax forfeit and was purchased by the developer at the state tax forfeit auction. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and. the proposed lots comply, with the requirements of the R -2 zoning district. The density of the development is consistent with past approvals given development proposals for this property. Staff recommends preliminary rezoning approval and preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat Approval The proponent, Mr. David Carlson was present. Commissioner Byron questioned why the developer .chose to rezone from PRD -2 to R -2. Mr. Larsen explained that townhouse developments require different platting procedures and setbacks. Mr. Larsen said the developer also wanted potential buyers to be able to own 1/2 of the unit and yard area. .Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen what are the required sideyard setbacks for this proposal. Mr. Larsen said R -2 zoning requires a sideyard setback of 10 feet for a single story building. Increased setback would be' required if the building' height was increased., Commissioner Faust questioned Mr. Carlson on the market values of the proposed townhouses. Mr. Carlson responded that the base price of each unit would be $199,000. With upgrades most units would be in the $225 -$250 thousand range. Commissioner Workinger asked the time frame on when the variance would be heard. Mr. Larsen said the request for a variance typically would be heard either. before final rezoning approval or after. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if the council could grant the variance if they choose. Mr. Larsen said the council can grant the variance, but staff is suggesting that the proponents go through the normal variance procedure. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Carlson when he plans to begin construction on the units if approval is granted. Mr. Carlson said he plans to begin construction in early spring. Commissioner Johnson noted that in his review of the plans there appears to be no access to the rearyard. Commissioner Johnson inquired if that is the case, will the hill remain wild. Mr. Carlson said it is his intent to leave the hill in it's natural state and not provide access to the rearyard. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Carlson what he ascertains will be the highest point.of the retaining walls. Mr. Carlson responded that the retaining walls will be constructed with a European process that will tier them, angling them back, and at one point the walls will be as high as 24 feet. Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Carlson if he would be willing to provide a conservation easement above the retaining walls. Mr. Carlson said he has not considered a conservation easement but would be willing to look into it if the commission felt it was necessary. Commissioner Johnson noted that the drainage would probably be Class A and questioned if the city engineer would study drainage, retaining walls etc.. Mr. Larsen said the engineering department will review the proposal studying the retaining walls as well as drainage_. Mr. Larsen said utility easements will be recommended as well. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Larsen where the frontyard setback are determined.' Mr. Larsen explained the frontyard setbacks-are determined from the property line and in this instance that may be the curb. Continuing, Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if at the closest point as the frontyard setbacks decrease could a unit be as close as 10 feet from the curb. Mr. Larsen said according to the plans the nearest unit to. the curb could be around 12 feet. Continuing, Mr. Larsen pointed out the street is very J isolated and impact on neighboring properties is minimal, almost non - existent. He stated staff desired less disturbance of the hill, which resulted in the need for frontyard setback variances. Mr. Larsen noted that the planning department will have the engineering department review this proposal .and if they recommend larger frontyard setbacks we would agree. Commissioner Workinger asked what the setbacks are between the existing Gleason Court development and the proposed development. Mr. Larsen said the setbacks are sideyard to rearyard. Chairman Palmer stated he was pleased to see that, the proponent acquired the end piece on Vernon Court. He said that piece creates a finer_ proposal and will make the area more cohesive. Commissioner Runyan.moved to recommend preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. Commissioner Hale asked if they would accept an amendment requiring a conservation easement above the retaining wall. The amendment was accepted. All voted aye; motion carried. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21 1922 2-92 -2 Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Residence District PRD -2, to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District and S -92 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval, Vernon Hill Addition - David Carlson Company, Inc. General Location: South of Vernon Avenue - north of Vernon Court The subject property measures slightly over four acres in size and is vacant. The development tract contains two parcels and included all remaining vacant property fronting on Vernon Court. A petition to rezoned the property to R -2 and plat eight double bungalow lots has been presented for approval. The R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District requires a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. The eight proposed lots all exceed 90 feet in width and range in area from 20,100 to 22,350 square feet in area. Thus, all lots meet or exceed zoning ordinance requirements for R -2 lots. The R -2 district requires a minimum front street setback of 30 feet. The conceptual site plan submitted by the developer illustrates a front street setback ranging from 20 feet to 35 feet with most units providing a 25 foot setback. Thus, five and 10 foot front setback variances are suggested. The reduced front setback is suggested to minimize the impact on steep slopes and reduce the height of required retaining walls. The proposed setback variances must be considered by the Zoning Board of Appeals is a separate action. The site plans and unit plans were submitted to show the developers intentions are not requirements of the requested zoning. The-subject property is designated as suitable for low density attached residential by the City Comprehensive Plan. Double bungalow development is consistent with this designation. During the past several years three different development proposals have been approved for the westerly 3.2 acres of this tract. In 1986, a .rezoning to PRD -3 was approved for a 15 unit townhouse development. In 1987 a five lot, -10 unit double bungalow development was approved in the summer of 1990. All of these development were consistent with the six unit per acre density allowed by.the low density attached residential classification of the property. The current proposal includes the above referenced property and an additional parcel at the easterly cul de sac measuring about 3/4 of a acre. The resulting overall density is four units per acre, which is approximately equal to the 12 unit proposal approved in 1990. The proponents have .submitted floor plans and prospective elevations for the development. The plans are similar to developments now underway in Bloomington and Eden Prairie by the developers. Previous proposals on this property were complicated by pending tax forfeiture actions. The property has since gone tax forfeit and. was purchased by the developer at the state tax forfeit auction. Recommendation: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the proposed' lots comply with the requirements of the: R -2 zoning district. The density of the development is consistent with past approvals given development proposals for this property. As mentioned earlier building placement and any resulting variances are not ,a part of the rezoning or subdivision actions. They are shown 'here only to'illustrate the developers intent. Staff intends to support the proposed setback variances based on the physical hardships caused by the steep slopes. Staff recommends preliminary rezoning approval and preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat Approval InI• r «Tel v, w .1.... m a •� i• cl I .. . ,A .. .. .. .. I .. .. I .. .. , .. .. -, BL if :I • :� \ ... I I �Iwo i•.o :Lp,0 : =.loo , 1 ro,sw f C=URF_ AM ,w w.wn ,. ooce .01 MIA M1h1[p -. Lor low wrr >.. L•l LR Li� 2 IM,LA I�AiI Let 0 iYNA TYPICAL LOT DETAIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION `v,ii:i,cw eJL1YJ el F 'eT «u.n.Irl1."e LJI y nylee 1Y.M .IY u •11 . M•I I.�w �ul�.0 r W., ee. •1' Ile 1 . lle•)1•J1�u.e•. DESCRIPTION TOIAL •ALA 100 K iIIILLi AYlIIT-0i -IST RATR, lots 11•,,00 W. ..J•1 I .(, ::�:+ / :.C+1' SCALE C -40F AVEAAGE LOT AREA 21,100 SF. .. . ,A .. .. .. .. I .. .. I .. .. , .. .. -, BL if :I • :� \ ... I I �Iwo i•.o :Lp,0 : =.loo , 1 ro,sw f C=URF_ AM ,w w.wn ,. ooce .01 MIA M1h1[p -. Lor low wrr >.. L•l LR Li� 2 IM,LA I�AiI Let 0 iYNA TYPICAL LOT DETAIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION `v,ii:i,cw eJL1YJ el F 'eT «u.n.Irl1."e LJI y nylee 1Y.M .IY u •11 . M•I I.�w �ul�.0 r W., ee. •1' Ile 1 . lle•)1•J1�u.e•. DESCRIPTION TOIAL •ALA 100 K iIIILLi AYlIIT-0i -IST RATR, lots 11•,,00 W. TOTAL w loll s AVEAAGE LOT AREA 21,100 SF. FJOSS s0L OO6Nr 4.0 ORITSIAC Ail wrl DENSITY • 0 1MTSIAC REVISIUNS CERTIFICATION , 1 S C H O E L L S M A D S O N, I N C. OWNER I DEVELOPER • - PROJECT NAPE I BNEET TITLE NAI tlr NL rI,I[IN_� IV. ` rry. •err — -- Ci° -- d, -•- ENGINEERS , SURVEYORS A PLANNERS VERNON HILL SOIL TESTING , ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC. _ X..Y.rL o.•.o� toe lo e.ri•T• eouLruD � PRELIMINARY PLAT Ar �vI H Ayr /!wP AINETpoll) Oi 07601• S5J07 DATA JUL T,IN7 A� 21rcc' I TES r, 1' N4 1 �1:• D ` ' I r IT i EM I THCAL SERVICES x -® SCALE I _1� I o � tl I • I _ - Ln- �} CAfI.KI a..na W■ [aUTW t' W WII.aT A[A2a uAVI{t rt.nc.Ll LEGEND .v�...l_ rOY10 tTYY 4.UI �� nxrouY water eau -- unnu aAU.ruO au[IluO Ur.Iir IK.t0.w{ AY .Rwr.YYt[ Ma .111 11 Ial tl vlalll,t MII.I lYa ■Al MAat AND lu ■.Ixxl 1pw NEV15111N5 CEIIIIEIt;AIIUN 1 SCHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. UVINER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME I SKEET TITLE xT I = �: �• r — ENGINEERS ■ SURVEYORS . PLAraiER3 VERI HILL SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONNENIAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC. Mao .•rl.l• 11=11 m PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ILIA 0". IuYI 0.11 JUI LI•YV: BUILDING I 1 WATER MIIOtmCIOOP6{Kt[D KME Ir M - CMO STOP 00W K D u al [ ■1 Tw DI. ►`I .Arz11YUN� I THCAL SERVICES x -® SCALE I _1� I o � tl I • I _ - Ln- �} CAfI.KI a..na W■ [aUTW t' W WII.aT A[A2a uAVI{t rt.nc.Ll LEGEND .v�...l_ rOY10 tTYY 4.UI �� nxrouY water eau -- unnu aAU.ruO au[IluO Ur.Iir IK.t0.w{ AY .Rwr.YYt[ Ma .111 11 Ial tl vlalll,t MII.I lYa ■Al MAat AND lu ■.Ixxl 1pw NEV15111N5 CEIIIIEIt;AIIUN 1 SCHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. UVINER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME I SKEET TITLE xT I = �: �• r — ENGINEERS ■ SURVEYORS . PLAraiER3 VERI HILL SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONNENIAL SERVICES DAVID CARLSON CO. INC. Mao .•rl.l• 11=11 m PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ILIA 0". IuYI 0.11 JUI LI•YV: s r •4: fre I `F:'O] I 1 • ;n, � 1111 II f9a� rr LOlf I t raL� s I 'SCALE - f •.Gf a..r .Mi nw ro I I �. 1••Q wMOt - -Ira. - IL cL, rrww - _ _ .3. n I 1MO T /tw9 ,. • ITrpN711 f01f/ If /MOflr Tl foalr I � � r I II lI!! /I !I!! Ii, y nfan I pwoo 1 = . rr wolr nwn \ „ n ,� •leM� IF w10 rr fuA 1 r /wt0 IINrO , W / �roio 1 � N9•r. no - ttMCT rot - '•• . - Ywal•n M r rIY .u.[ .-1-.- W � � I' .•, JJ Y11 .J -.020 — rfwOwO twtwwf , ,JI1 q} II �..�. �• tIl rte! IfOWI A POT C.I.MM ucorrtxo[o Ib -Ix Iftxcn nllw[3nYwO llrwwl uwr.w wmM • AIAxT L w PA<LY rr Wl.tl. Iuw • • L J = ^� :�'�: ��,,, w14wq HLl EROS.O CO.AOL UEIAIL r.•^ _•CAI01 MASw OETAIL REVISION'S CERTIFICATION 1 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Cy. tlI Rk VI51(Ix .. rl. rw +� -,r u�. �.r.. ENGINEERS f SURVEYORS L PLOVERS Jl�w .w. SOIL TESTING ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 105 D - - - -- �I.V NNEIO .I. IA BDULEVARD Nr r Hey r� MI 10NLA. Nlrn$5M11 55303 16121 516 -7601 OWNER I DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME 7 SHEET TITLE DAVID CARLSON CO. INC. VERNON HILL (PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DATE:JULT.199r OAK POINTE TOWNHOMES A Reggie Award Winning Design 1,657 square feet by David Carlson Companies, Inc. A Reggie Award Builder Fxbawt B 11m, V, A.IM ■ FIREPLACE OPT-oNAL 11 rl FAMILY ROOM r:.. 22' x 20' II II - I II UP Elm STORAGE FuR. 11 II . —. BEDROOM I �� , 151x13 tt WLI II I II ❑ PATIO, 12'x 10' (Walk -out lots only) LOWER LEVEL 800 SQ. FT (WHEN FINISHED) AD Dmmman AWOxwn" OAK POINTE TOWNHONES City Location with Country Hair— Location, location, location — the three secrets of home ownership. And, Oak.Pointe makes location more meaningful than ever before. Oak Pointe embraces the best of Bloomington, adds a Reggie Award- winning townhome design, . captures the lakes and advantages of a nationally recognized recreational program. Want specifics? Oak Pointe is located next to some of the areas finest park land: Hyland Park Reserve, Bush Lake and other nearby lakes. The area offers miles of biking, hiking, cross - country ski trails and a downhill ski location. Golfers are near Hyland Greens and Dwan city -owned courses. Oak Pointe planning captures the areas vistas, preserves the natural beauty of the site. "Then check oll' the convenience to shopping centers, schools, simple freeway access (but not too close), Bloomington Community Center. Discover the good life without the big commute. You must see Oak Pointe Townhomes. See how much more Oak Pointe gives you for your housing dollar, see design that'ntakcs every day a living joy. Oak Pointe Townhomes include these features: • Washer • Dryer • Refrigerator • Range ■ Dishwasher • Disposal • Rangehood • Central Air • Carpoing • $S(N) Light Fixture Allowance • Cultured Marble Vanity "lops • Ceramic Tile Kitchen Floor • Ceramic Tile Baths • Vinyl Flooring in Laundry • Deck (Size of Porch) • Black Top Driveway • Underground Sprinkler System • Landscaped Common Areas • Wood Handrailings • Lower level Bath Rough -In • 2 Car Attached Garage • Garage Door Opener • Maintenance Free Vinyl Siding • Vinyl Clad Windows IN Rain Gullcrs On Garagc Along Sidewalk ■ Solid Core Birch Doors (except closet by -pass) Your Oak Pointe Townhome includes the security of a 10 -Year (HOW) insured warranty. X ' HWY 494 g O cc h1oHH,600 fn 84TH ST. �R�VF w 51 Go a W.g4m O O • COQ X �" POINTE r W s N J o X m M z ¢ O z CO. RD.1 OLD SHAKOPEE RD. HWY 18 m Oak Pointe Monthly Association Fee: $135 guaranteed thru 1/1/94, pays for these owner services: Insurance on the Building Common Area Electricity Common Area Water and Sewer Exterior Maintenance of the Building Road Maintenance Recreational Building r t� Member of Minneapolis Builders Association and the National Association of Home Builders. Member Better Business Bureau a Q EQUaI Mouvng Opponunny Reserves for Future Repairs Trash Removal Lawn Mowing Snow Shoveling. Ground Maintenance Outdoor Swimming Pool . OAK POINTE TOWNHO14ES . PHONE 949 -961.6 DAVID CARLSON COMPANIES,_ INC. A ffi%gie Atrurel Miller A. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE H O. v TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT-: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 21 September, 1992 AGENDA ITEM - Iv. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50th & France Pedestrian Lights Company Amount of Quote or Bid Carnes (Proprietary Item) $ 23,486.70 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5, RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Carnes $ 23,486.70 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the final purchase of public lighting fixtures for 50th & France Commercial Area for the Streetscape project. These costs are figured into the assessment process.being held next month. Private developers are buying some additional fixtures to use on their buildings. These fixtures will be used under the new walkway canopy next to Bellesons, and to light along the east side of the alley along the middle ramp. ignat e> The Recommended bid is within budget not Engineering . Department Finance Director Manager A. oe`(n Hr� �° • f ~�bRroMt�v leas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR PRO -TEM AND COUNCIL Agenda Item ## V.A .. From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent Information Only ❑ Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 i Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: AMENDMENT OF COUNCIL ❑ To Council iMINUTES OF JULY 6, 1992 i Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution i ❑! Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve amendment of Council Minutes of July 6, 1992, to include the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NORMANDALE GOLF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled " NORMANDALE GOLF ", platted by Normandale Golf, Inc. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 6, 1992, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Info /Background See attached memorandum from Attorney Gilligan. MEMORANDUM TO: Marcella Daehn City Clerk FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: September 18, 1992 RE: Amendment of Minutes of July 6, 1992 City Council Meeting At its meeting on July 6, 1992, the City Council held a public hearing on the Normandale Golf Area. The hearing was noticed as being on an amendment to Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval related to the proposed redevelopment (and this was reflected in the agenda for the meeting). At the conclusion of the hearing the City Council approved the proposed acquisition of Normandale Golf Course and the development of an office building on the 6.2 acres fronting on West 77th Street subject to certain setback lines and building size and height limits. The minutes of the July 6th meeting include the adoption of a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to designate the 6.2 acres fronting on West 77th Street as a potential office development site and first reading to an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to transfer the 6.2 acres to Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1. The minutes inadvertently did not include a resolution giving preliminary plat approval. It is recommended that the minutes of the July 6th City Council meeting be amended to include a resolution approving the preliminary plat for Normandale Golf Course. DORSEY & WHITNEY :\ 1'. \H'1'. \'EHtl111Y 1�l'LL'UI �'U I'NUIlX41U�'wL L�OH1Yl H. \TIU \'H o e tri Cn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR PRO -TEM AND COUNCIL From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 I M Subject: NORMANDALE GOLF COURSE PURCHASE AGREEMENT, DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND FINDINGS OF FACT Recommendation: Agenda Item # vv_B Consent [K] Information Only ;r. Recommends ❑ 1E Action IL To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Approve and adopt the attached resolution authorizing execution of purchase agreement and development contract, and making findings of fact. Info /Background: When the Council approved the purchase of the Normandale Golf Course property at the meeting of July 6, 1992, the Council requested that the contract and purchase agreement documents be brought back to the Council for approval. Mayor Richards has followed the negotiations on the contract and purchase agreement and has agreed to the terms therein. The terms are the same as were presented to the Council on July 6, 1992, and which the Council approved at that time. ik, 4 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENTS FOR NORMANDALE GOLF COURSE PROPERTY, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DECLARING INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF BONDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (herein called the "City "), as follows: 1. RECITALS. Normandale Golf, Inc. (herein called the "Owner ") is the owner of property lying north of West 77th Street and east of Highway 100 in the corporate limits of the City, described as Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (herein called "Tract R "). Tract R is now and has been used as and for a commercial private nine -hole golf course known as Normandale Golf Course, which has been operated by the Owner. It has been proposed that the City purchase Tract R from the Owner on the terms and conditions contained in a Purchase Agreement between the Owner and the City (herein called the "Purchase Agreement "), a copy of which has been presented to this Council. The Purchase Agreement provides that the City and the Owner will enter into an Option and Development Contract (herein called the "Development Contract "), a copy of which has been presented to this Council, pursuant to which the City grants to the Owner the option to repurchase from the City a portion of Tract R constituting approximately 6.2 acres and fronting on West 77th Street (herein called the "Development Property"). The City proposes to reconstruct Normandale Golf Course for use as a public nine -hole golf course. For access to the east end of the reconstructed golf course the City proposes to acquire a driveway easement (herein called the "Driveway Easement ") from Pentagon Park Limited Partnership (herein called "Pentagon Park ") on the terms and conditions contained in a Purchase Agreement (for Easement Agreement), between the City and Pentagon Park (herein called the "Easement Agreement "), a copy of which has been presented to this Council. The Development Contract provides that if the Owner exercises its option to purchase the Development Property, the Owner acquires such property subject to certain restrictions and limitations set forth in the Development Contract which are imposed for the benefit of the City. By resolution adopted July 6, 1992, this Council has amended the Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Property as a potential office development site and to show the balance of Tract R as "public" area, and on July 6, 1992 gave first reading to an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City to transfer the Development Property to the Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1 and preliminary approval to a subdivision of the Development Property from the balance of Tract R. 2. AUTHORIZATIONS AND APPROVALS. The City hereby authorizes the purchase by the City of Tract R upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, and the granting by the City to the Owner of the option to repurchase the Development Property upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Development Contract and the acquisition by the City of the Driveway Easement upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Easement Agreement. The forms of the Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Easement Agreement are approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the Mayor and City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the Purchase Agreement, Development Contract and Easement Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transactions herein contemplated. 3. FINDINGS. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: A. The City acknowledges that during the period the Development Contract is in effect it will not place any further restrictions, encumbrances or other impediments to the development of the Development Property other than as may be contained in the Ordinances of the City, including, but limited to, the City's Zoning Ordinance, as in effect from time to ,time, and no amendment by the City to the comphrensive plan or official control shall apply to affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approval application- unless approved in writing by the Owner. B. The City acknowledges that Section 8.3 of the Development Contract provides that upon exercise by the Owner of its option to purchase the Development Property under. the Development Contract, the Owner and City intend to apply for rezoning of the Development Property to Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1, so that Owner can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings (a) with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross floor area is defined in the City's Zoning Ordinance) for all buildings on the Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to the setback lines shown on Exhibit C to the Development Contract. C. The City believes that the development of the Development Property in the manner and subject to the restrictions set forth in B above is reasonable and appropriate. D. The Development Property fronts on West 77th Street, which is a heavily traveled commercial street and has office developments to its east, west and south and will be separated from single family dwellings located north of Tract R by Normanda)e Golf Course. -2- E. It is consistent with past planning and zoning practice of the City to permit the Development Property to be developed in the manner and subject to the restrictions set forth in B above particularly in light of and recognizing that adjacent parcels have office developments located thereon. F. To the extent the development of the Development Property is subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 8.3 of the Development Contract, the City will assert no claim of right and waives all claims in respect of the development of the Development Property except as set forth in this Resolution, and will assert no benefit of any restriction on its use other than as provided in the Development Contract, Minnesota or federal laws and in the Ordinances of the City, including, but not limited to, the City's Zoning Ordinance, as in effect from time to time. G. The City has given first reading to an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City to transfer the Development Property to the Planned Office District, Subdistrict POD -1, has amended the Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Property as a potential office development site and to show the balance of Tract R as "public" area, and has given preliminary approval to a subdivision of the Development Property from the balance of Tract R. H. The City acknowledges that the setback, size, height and berming requirements contained in the Development Contract are specific restrictions to which the Development Property is subject if it is purchased upon the exercise of the option granted by the Development Contract, and further acknowledges that such restrictions are subject to termination upon the conditions set forth in Section 9.1 of the Development Contract. 4. REIMBURSEMENT. The City reasonably expects to reimburse up to $800,000 of the expenditures to be made by the City for the purchase of Tract R out of the proceeds of the general obligation bonds to be issued by the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (herein called the "Bonds "). All reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures as defined in Section 1.150 -1(h) of the United States Treasury Regulations (herein called the "Regulations "). This declaration is a declaration of official intent adopted pursuant to Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations. As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for expenditures related to the purchase of Tract R, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Bonds. Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of.the City maintained for the Bonds, shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed or, in the case of reimbursement of a fund or account in accordance with Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, the fund or account -3- account in accordance with Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, the fund or account from which the expenditure was paid, and shall be effective to relieve the proceeds of the Bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution or other relevant legal documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable state statute, which would apply to unspent proceeds of the Bonds. This resolution, therefore, is determined to be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances as they exist or are reasonably forseeable on the date hereof, all within the meaning and content of Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations. The City Finance Director shall be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in Section 1.103 -18 of the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the purchase price of Tract R. -4- 9/18/92 PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of September, 1992, by and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Seller ") and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Buyer "). In consideration of this Agreement, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. Sale of Property. Subject to the terms, conditions and provisions herein, Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy from Seller, the following property (collectively, "Property"): 1.1 Real Property. The real property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described on the attached Exhibit A ( "Land ") together with all improvements ( "Improvements ") constructed or located on the Land (collectively the "Real Property "). 1.2 Personal Property. All of the personal property owned by Seller and situated in, on, or about the Real Property on the Closing Date and used by Seller to operate or maintain the golf course on the Land ( "Personal Property "). 2. Purchase Price and Manner of Payment. The total purchase price ( "Purchase Price ") to be paid for the Property shall be Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000.00). The Purchase Price shall be payable as follows: 2.1 $1,000.00 as earnest money ( "Earnest Money ") which Earnest Monev shall be held by Seller in accordance with this Agreement. 2.2 The balance by wire transfer of good funds on the Closing Date. 3. Contingencies. 3.1 The obligations of Seller under this Agreement are contingent upon the representations and warranties of Buyer contained in this Agreement, if true to Buyer's knowledge and belief, being true on the date of this Agreement and Buyer must again confirm them in writing; on the Closing Date as being true and correct on the Closing Date. 3.2 The obligations of Buyer under this Agreement are contingent upon each of the following: 3.2.1 . Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement, if true to Seller's knowledge and belief, being true on the date of this Agreement and Seller must again confirm them in writing on the Closing Date as being true and correct on the Closing Date. 3.2.2 Title. Title shall have been found acceptable, or been made acceptable, in accordance with the requirements and terms of Section 6 below. 3.2.3 Access and Inspection. Seller shall have allowed Buyer, and Buyer's agents, access to the Real Property without charge and at all reasonable times for the purpose of Buyer's investigation and testing the same. Seller shall make available to Buyer and Buyer's agents without charge copies of all plans and specifications, records, maps, soil tests, engineering studies, inventories, environmental reports, permits and correspondence in Seller's possession relating to Hazardous Substances affecting the Property; and the right to interview employees of Seller who may have knowledge of such matters. Buyer shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall restore the Real Property to as nearly as possible the condition it was in immediately prior to such investigation and testing, and shall hold Seller and the Real Property harmless from all costs and liabilities relating to the Buyer's activities except such liabilities arising solely out of information produced or obtained as a result of Buyer's activities. Buyer shall have been satisfied with the results of all tests and investigations performed by it or on its behalf. 3.2.4 Government ARRrovals. Buyer shall have obtained at its sole cost and expense on or before the Closing Date all final governmental approvals necessary in Buyer's sole judgment, in order to construct on the Land, and use the Property for, the golf course desired by Buyer and to use the well located on the Land. Seller shall cooperate in all reasonable respects with Buyer in obtaining such approvals, and shall execute such applications, permits and other documents as may be requested by Buyer in connection therewith which do not create encumbrances on, or adversely affect the title to, the Property, all without cost to Seller. 3.2.5 Street Easement. Buyer shall have obtained, on terms and conditions acceptable to Buyer, an easement for public street and 7 utility purposes from Parklawn Avenue east of the Land to the clubhouse to be constructed on the eastern end of the Land. If any contingency in 3.1 hereof or 3.2 hereof has not been satisfied on or before the Closing Date, then this Agreement may be terminated by notice from Seller to Buyer as to contingencies in 3.1, and from Buyer to Seller as to contingencies in 3.2, which notice shall be given on or before the Closing Date. Upon termination, the Earnest Money shall be released to Buyer and upon return, neither party will have any further rights or obligations regarding this Agreement or the Property. All the contingencies in 3.1 are specifically for the benefit of the Seller, and the Seller shall have the right to waive any contingency by written notice to Buyer. All the contingencies in 3.2 are specifically for the benefit of the Buyer, and the Buyer shall have the right to waive any contingency by written notice to Seller. Seller understands and agrees that Buyer shall have no obligation or duty to take any action or make any decision so as to satisfy any or all of the contingencies at 3.1 or 3.2, but Buyer has and retains all of its municipal authority relating to such contingencies. If Buyer should fail or refuse, for any reason, to act or decide in a way that would satisfy all of such contingencies, such failure or refusal shall not be deemed a default under this Agreement, but Seller's sole and exclusive remedy and relief shall be termination of this Agreement for non - satisfaction of such contingency, or waiver of such contingency, as provided in this Section 3. 4. Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by this Agreement (the "Closing ") shall occur on the date of this Agreement (the "Closing Date "). The Closing shall take place at 1:30 p.m. local time at Dorsey & Whitney, 220 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Seller agrees to deliver possession of the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date. 4.1 Seller's Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer the following (collectively, "Seller's Closing Documents "), all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Buyer 4.1.1 Deed. A Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Real Property to Buyer, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted Encumbrances hereafter defined. 4.1.2 Bill of Sale. A Warranty Bill of Sale conveying the Personal Property to Buyer, free and clear of all encumbrances except Permitted Encumbrances. 4.1.3 Original Documents. Except for plans, specifications, reports, studies, maps and similar documents relating to improvementN planned for, but never constructed on, the Property, originals or 3 copies of all permits, maps, surveys, environmental reports and studies, plans and specifications, soil tests, engineering studies, and similar documents for the Property in Seller's possession. 4.1.4 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations. 4.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate certificate of title regarding the Real Property. 4.1.6 Well Certificate and Permits. A Well Certificate in the form required by Minn. Stat. § 103I, an assignment and transfer to Buyer of all permits related to any wells on the Real Property and the originals of all such permits, if available. 4.1.7 Storage Tanks. If the Property contains or contained a storage tank or tanks, an affidavit with respect thereto, as required by Minn. Stat. § 116.48 and Seller shall give all notifications and register such tank or tanks as required by statute. 4.1.8 Option and Development Contract. The Option and Development Contract (the "Option and Development Contract ") in substantially the form and content of Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4.1.9 Representations and Warranties. Written confirmation that the warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are true and correct as of the Closing Date. Seller shall have no liability for failure to reconfirm warranties, if Seller, in good faith, believes such warranties not to be true on the Closing Date; provided, however, nothing shall release Seller from liability for representations and warranties made herein prior to the Closing Date. If Seller fails to reconfirm all such warranties, Buyer, at its option, may terminate this Agreement in the same manner, and with the same effect and result, as termination for failure to satisfy a contingency in Section 3 hereof. The five day period in which this Agreement can be terminated shall begin on the date of such failure of Seller to reconfirm. 4.1.10 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of Real Estate Value in customary form. 4 4.1.11 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in the Property. 4.1.12 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the Property to Buyer free and clear of all encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to the provisions hereof. 4.2 Buyer's Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Buyer will execute and deliver to Seller the following (collectively, "Buyer's Closing Documents "): 4.2.1 Purchase Price. Funds representing the Purchase Price, by wire transfer of good funds. 4.2.2 Representations and Warranties. Written confirmation that the warranties of Buyer contained in this Agreement are true and correct as of the Closing Date. Buyer shall have no liability for failure to reconfirm warranties, if Buyer, in good faith, believes such warranties not to be true on the Closing Date; provided, however, nothing shall release Buyer from liability for representations and warranties made herein prior to the Closing Date. If Buyer fails to reconfirm all such warranties, Seller, at its option, may terminate this Agreement in the same manner, and with the same effect and result, as termination for failure to satisfy a contingency in Section 3 hereof. The five day period in which this Agreement can be terminated shall begin on the date of such failure of Buyer to reconfirm. 4.2.3 Option and Development Contract. The Option and Development Contract in substantially the form and content of Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 5. Prorations. Seller and Buyer agree to the following pro- rations and allocation of costs regarding this Agreement: 5.1 Title Insurance and Closing Fee. Seller will pay all costs of the Title Evidence, the Title Policy and the fees charged by Title for any escrow required regarding Buyer's Objections. Seller and Buyer will each pay one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by the title company. 5 5.2 Deed Tax. Seller shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection with this transaction. 5.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. 5.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes, against the Real Property payable. in 1991 and all prior years shall be paid in full by Seller on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the Real Property payable in 1992 shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. 5.3.2 Special Assessments. All special assessments levied or pending against all or any part of the -Real Property as of the Closing shall be paid in full by Buyer on or before the Closing. If the amount of the pending assessments are not known at Closing, such amount shall be determined by Buyer, in its sole discretion, and such amount shall be paid by Seller to Buyer at Closing, and Buyer shall be responsible for paying such assessments when due. 5.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the Real Property is now valued and assessed under Minnesota Statutes, § 273.112, that Buyer assumes full risk of the imposition against the Real Property of additional taxes pursuant to said § 273.112 or otherwise, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the Real Property, Seller shall have no obligation to pay the same. 5.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated between Seller and Buyer as of the Closing Date, so that Seller pays that part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and Buyer pans that part of operating costs accruing from and after the Closing Date. 5.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees, except that a party defaulting under this Agreement or any Closing Document will pay the reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the nondefaulting party to enforce its rights hereunder. 6. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows.- 6.1 Seller's Title Evidence. Seller shall, prior to closing, furnish the following (collectively, "Title Evidence ") to Buyer: 6.1.1 A commitment ( "Title Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B 1970 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Real Z Property, deleting standard exceptions and including affirmative insurance regarding contiguity, appurtenant easements and such other matters as may be identified by Buyer, in the amount of the Purchase Price, issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota ( "Title "). 6.1.2 A survey prepared by a registered land surveyor licensed to practice in Minnesota showing the Real Property, the boundaries thereof, the location of all buildings and easements thereon, and such other information and containing such matters as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6.2 Buyer's Objections. Prior to Closing, Buyer will make written objections ( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title Evidence. Buyer's failure to make Objections within such time period will constitute waiver of Objections but only for purposes of this Agreement; it shall not be a waiver of any rights or objections Buyer may have as a municipality to approve or disapprove of plats or subdivisions pursuant to its ordinances or applicable state statutes. The encumbrances listed on Exhibit A hereto and any matter shown on such Title Evidence and not objected to by Buyer shall be a "Permitted Encumbrance" hereunder. Seller will have until the Closing Date to cure the Objections, during which period the Closing will be postponed, if necessary. Seller shall use all reasonable efforts (without expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000.00 as contemplated by paragraph 6.2.2) to correct any Objections. If the Objections are not cured prior to Closing, Buyer will have the option to do any of the following: 6.2.1 Terminate this Agreement and receive a refund of the Earnest Money without interest. 6.2.2 Withhold from the Purchase Price an amount, not to exceed $10,000.00, which, in the reasonable judgment of Title, is sufficient to assure cure of the Objections. Any amount so withheld will be placed in escrow with Title, pending such cure. If Seller does not cure such Objections within ninety (90) days after such escrow is established, Buyer may then cure such Objections and charge the costs against, and only against, the escrowed amount. The parties agree to execute and deliver such documents as may be reasonably required by Title to create such escrow, and Seller agrees to pay the charges of Title to create and administer the escrow. VA 6.2.3 Waive the objections and proceed to close. 6.3 Title Policy. Seller will furnish to Buyer at Closing a title policy ( "Title Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a suitably marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking to issue a Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment as approved by Buyer and Seller will obtain an optionee's policy of title insurance or a suitable marked -up title commitment initialed by Title undertaking to issue an optionee's policy of title insurance in respect to the Development Property. 7. Operation. Seller shall execute no contracts, leases or other agreements regarding the Property that are not terminable on or before the Closing Date, without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent may be withheld by Buyer at its sole discretion. Buyer shall remove the building and other improvements now located on that portion of the Land described on the attached Exhibit F (the "Development Property") as soon as reasonably possible after the Closing Date. Buyer shall not develop or permit the development of any wetlands on the Development Property. Buyer shall (from the date hereof until termination of the Option and Development Contract or closing of the transaction contemplated by the Option and Development Contract) use the Development Property for a "qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. Buyer agrees (a) to build the berm, and plant shrubs, trees and other plants thereon, as shown on the plan (the "Berm Plan" attached hereto as Exhibit G within two years after the Closing Date, and (b) to replace in accordance with the Berm Plan any shrubs, trees and other plants thereon that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to such an extent that based upon a standard of reasonableness both as to function and appearance any such shrub, tree or other plant should be replaced. 8. Representations and Warranties. 8.1 Seller represents and warrants to Buyer as follows: 8.1.1 Existence; Authority. Seller is duly organized, qualified and in good standing, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and Seller's Closing Documents; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Seller, and are enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, debt arrangement, moratorium, insolvency or other E. laws of general application, and equitable principles affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights. in general. 8.1.2 Leases and Contracts. Except for Permitted Encumbrances, there are no leases or contracts regarding the Property which will bind the Property or any owner of the Property beyond the Closing Date, and except for Permitted Encumbrances, no persons other than Buyer shall have any possessory rights of all or any part of the Property after the Closing Date. 8.1.3 Operations. Seller has received no notice of actual or threatened cancellation or suspension of any utility services or certificate of occupancy for any portion of the Real Property. 8.1.4 Agents and Employees. No management agents or other personnel employed in connection with the operation of the Property have the right to continue such employment after the Closing Date. There are no claims for brokerage commission or other payments with respect to the existing Property, including leases, which will survive and remain unpaid after the Closing Date. 8.1.5 Environmental Laws. To the best knowledge of Seller, except for pesticides and fertilizer used in the ordinary maintenance and operation of the Golf Course located on the Land, (i) no toxic or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined in any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the environment) (collectively, "Hazardous Substance ") have been generated, treated, stored, transferred from, released or disposed of, or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Property; (ii) no activity has been undertaken on the Property that would cause or contribute to the Property becoming a treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of, or otherwise bring t};L- Property within the ambit of, any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the environment; (iii) no discharge, release or threatened release of Hazardous Substances has occurred from the Property; (iv) them are no Hazardous Substances or conditions in or on the Property that may support a claim or cause of action under any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule; policy or order relating to the protection of the environment; and (v) the Property never has been used as landfill, dump, disposal or storage site for Hazardous Substances. 8.1.6 Seller's Defaults. Seller is not in default concerning any of its obligations or liabilities regarding the Property which creates, or will create, alien or charge against any portion of the Property or against Buyer as an owner of the Property. 8.1.7 FIRPTA. Seller is not a "foreign person ", "foreign partnership ", "foreign trust" or "foreign estate ", as those terms are defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. 8.1.8 Proceedings. There is no action, litigation, investigation, condemnation or proceeding of any kind pending or threatened against Seller which is related to or involves any portion of the Property. 8.1.9 Wells. Seller represents that there is one "Well" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 103I on the Property, that Seller has received all necessary permits for the operation, maintenance and use thereof, and in connection therewith Seller delivers to Buyer, and Buyer acknowledges receipt of, the Minnesota Well Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit D. 8.1.10 Storage Tanks. To the best knowledge of Seller, no above ground or underground tanks are located in or about the Property, or have been located under, in or about the Property and have subsequently been removed or filled, except for the above ground tank, if any, described on Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part hereof and that with respect to the above ground tank, if any, described on the attached Exhibit E, all notifications and registrations as required by Statute have been given, made and completed. 8.1.11 Reports. Except for plans, specifications, reports, studies, maps and similar documents relating to improvements planned for, but never constructed on, the Property, Seller has delivered to Buyer copies of all permits, maps, environmental reports and studies, plans and specifications, soil tests, engineering studies and similar documents relating to the Property which are in the possession of Seller. EIS Seller will indemnify Buyer, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Buyer, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Buyer incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Buyer is purchasing the Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property "as is, where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties and representations herein contained. 8.2 Buyer represents and warrants to Seller as follows: 8.2.1 Existence; Authority. Buyer is duly organized municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and Buyer's Closing Documents; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Buyer, and are enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, debt arrangement, moratorium, insolvency or other laws of general application, and equitable principles affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general. Buyer will indemnify Seller, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Seller, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Seller incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. 9. Casualty; Condemnation. If all or any part of the Property is substantially damaged by fire, casualty, the elements or any other cause, Seller shall immediately give notice to Buyer, and Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and receive back all Earnest Money, without interest, by giving notice prior to Closing. If Buyer shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Seller shall assign to Buyer all rights to insurance proceeds resulting from such event. If eminent domain proceedings are threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Property, Seller shall immediately give notice to Buyer, and Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and receive back all Earnest Money, without interest, by giving notice prior to Closing. If Buyer shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Seller shall assign to Bttyer all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. 11 10. Broker's Commission. Seller and Buyer represent to each other that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or commissions resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Agreement, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 11. Assignment. Except as provided in the Option and Development Contract, neither party may assign its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Any such assignment will not relieve the assigning party of its obligations under this Agreement. 12. Survival. All of the terms of this Agreement and warranties and representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing. 13. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable overnight courier, properly addressed as follows: If to Seller: Normandale Golf, Inc. c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law P. O. Box 150 Minnetonka, MN 55440 Fax #: (612) 938 -3346 If to Buyer: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager Fax #: (612) 927 -7645 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing, transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice b� giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. 12 14. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement, and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties and their successors and assigns. This Agreement has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. Time is of the essence. 15. Remedies. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, Seller shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Buyer. If Buyer fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this Agreement will terminate, and upon such termination Seller will retain the Earnest Money as liquidated damages, time being of the essence of this Agreement. The termination of this Agreement and retention of the Earnest Money will be the sole remedy available to Seller for such default by Buyer, and Buyer will not be liable for damages or specific performance. If Seller defaults under this Agreement, this provision does not preclude Buyer from seeking and recovering from Seller damages for nonperformance or specific performance of this Agreement. 16. Withdrawal of Offer. This Agreement shall be deemed to be withdrawn, unless accepted by Seller, and a fully executed counterpart of this Agreement returned to Buyer on or before the closing of business on the fifth business day after, but not including, the date of signature of Buyer below stated. Seller and Buyer have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Date of Signature ,19 13 NORMANDALE GOLF, INC. By Its CITY OF EDINA SELLER Date of Signature ,19 14 By - Its Mayor And Its Manager BUYER EXHIBIT A - ( "Land ") Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances): 1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121. EXHIBIT B OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ( "Contract ") is made as of the day of September, 1992 (the "Commencement Date "), by and between the CITY OF EDNA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Edina "), and NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, ( "Normandale "). BACKGROUND: A. Edina has purchased from Normandale certain real property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the 'Property"). B. Edina has given preliminary approval to a subdivision of that part of the Property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Development Property ") from the balance of the Property and certain conditions have been imposed in connection with such approval. C. Edina and Normandale desire to enter into this Contract not only with Edina as owner, but as provided in Section 810 of the Ordinance of Edina and in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 2a., 3c. and 4b.(6). AGREEMENT: In consideration of the foregoing premises and other valuable consideration, Edina and Normandale agree as follows: 1. Purchase Option. Edina grants to Normandale an option ( "Purchase Option ") to purchase the Development Property for One Dollar ($1.00). Normandale shall exercise such Purchase Option, if at all, by giving a written notice to Edina after the Commencement Date and before the sixteenth (16th) anniversary of the Commencement Date ('Purchase Option Term "). In the event Normandale fails to exercise the Purchase Option during the Purchase Option Term this Contract shall, without further action or demand, terminate and be of no further force or effect. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, Edina and Normandale shall each execute and deliver to the other an agreement (the "Termination Agreement ") in recordable and customary form evidencing the termination of this Contract. - 2. -- Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by the Purchase Option (the "Closing ") will occur on the date (the "Closing Date" which is the earlier of (a) the date 120 days after the date upon which Normandale exercises the Purchase Option or (b) the date that is the later -of (i) the date five (5) business days after Normandale has waived or been deemed to have waived all Objections (as defined in paragraph 5.2 of this Contract) or such Objections have been cured by Edina, or (ii) the date five (5) days after Edina completes a nonappealable division of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract, or (iii) the date five days after the rezoning of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is obtained. The Closing will take place at 9:00 a.m. local time at the office selected by Edina. Edina agrees to deliver possession of the Development Property to Normandale on the Closing Date. 3. Closing Documents. 3.1 On the Closing Date, Edina shall execute and deliver to Normandale the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Normandale: 3.1.1 Deed. Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Development Property to Normandale, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted Encumbrances hereafter defined and except for the building size and height restrictions and set back requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract which shall be set forth in said Limited Warranty Deed and shall run with the title to the Development Property and every part thereof and interest therein and shall be binding upon all persons, parties and entities having or acquiring any right, title, interest or estate in the Development Property, or any part thereof. 3.1.2 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations. 3.1.3 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by Edina, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in the Development Property. 3.1.4 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of Real Estate Value in customary form. 3.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate certificate of title regarding the Development Property. Fa 3.1.6 Termination. Termination of Memorandum of this Contract which may have been recorded. 3.1.7 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the Development Property to Normandale free and clear of all encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to the provisions hereof. 3.2 On the Closing Date, Normandale shall (a) execute, deliver and grant to Edina a perpetual, non - exclusive easement for storm sewer purposes in substantially the form and content of, and over, under and across the portion of the Development Property described in, the easement attached hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof and (b) execute and deliver an agreement in recordable form evidencing and confirming the agreement set forth in paragraph 8.9 hereof. 4. Prorations. Edina and Normandale agree to the following pro- rations and allocation of costs regarding this Contract: 4.1 Title Insurance and Closing Fee. Normandale will pay all costs of the Title Commitment, the title policy issued pursuant to the Title Commitment and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title. 4.2 Deed Tax. Edina shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection with this transaction and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title. 4.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. 4.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes against the Development Property payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Except as provided in paragraph 4.3.3 hereof, all real estate taxes against the Development Property appropriately pro -rated on an area basis if the Development Property is part of a larger tax parcel payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Normandale except that Edina shall pay any real estate taxes 3 related to improvements not located on the Development Property. 4.3.2 Svecial Assessments. All installments of special assessments levied against all or any part of the Development Property payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or before Closing. All installments of special assessments levied against all or any part of the Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be pro rated as of the Closing Date. All installments of special assessments levied or pending against all or any part of the Development Property payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Normandale. In the event any such special assessment is levied and assessed against property which includes the Development Property, such special assessment shall be equitably divided and allocated so that the special assessments levied against the Development Property are separate from the special assessments against the balance of the property of which the Development Property is a part. Edina agrees that no special assessments shall be levied by Edina against the Development Property due to the division of the Property pursuant to Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the development by Edina of a golf course on the Property. 4.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the Development Property is now valued and assessed under Minnesota Statutes, § 273.112. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option within five (5) years after the date of this Contract, after the Closing Normandale assumes the full risk of the imposition against the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said § 273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall have no obligation to pay the same. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option more than five (5) years after the date of this Contract, Edina assumes the full risk of the imposition against the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said §273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall pay the same. 4 4.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated between Edina and Normandale as of the Closing Date, so that Edina pays that part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and Normandale pays that part of operating costs accruing from and after the Closing Date. 4.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees, except that a party defaulting under this Contract will pay the reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the nondefaulting party to enforce its rights hereunder. - 5. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows: 5.1 Edina's Title Evidence. Normandale shall, within twenty (20) days after the exercise of the Purchase Option, obtain a commitment ( "Title Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B 1970 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Real Property, deleting standard exceptions and including affirmative insurance regarding contiguity, appurtenant easements and such other matters as may be identified by Normandale, in the amount of the Fair Market Value of the Development Property (as defined in Paragraph 8.5 of this Contract), issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota ( "Title "). 5.2 Normandale's Objections. Within twenty (20) days after receiving the Title Commitment, Normandale will make written objections ( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title Commitment. Normandale's failure to make Objections within such time period will constitute waiver of Objections. The encumbrances listed on Exhibit A hereto, the building size and height restrictions and set back requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract (unless such restrictions and requirements shall terminate pursuant to paragraph 9.1 hereof), the real estate taxes and special assessments to be paid by Normandale pursuant to paragraph 4.3 hereof and any matter shown on such Title Commitment and not objected to by Normandale shall :kv a "Permitted Encumbrance" hereunder and not Objections. Edina . %.I:1 have 60 days after receipt of the Objections to cure the Objections, during which period the Closing will be postponed, if necessary. Edina shall correct any Objections. 5.3 Title Policy. Edina shall obtain for Normandale at Closing a title poli<<, ( "Title Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a suitably marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking to issue a Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment a, reasonably approved by Normandale at standard rates. 5 6. Operation Prior to Closing. Edina shall execute no contracts, leases or other agreements regarding the Development Property during the Purchase ' Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the proper termination of this Contract, that are not terminable on or before the Closing Date, without the prior written consent of Normandale, which consent may be' withheld by Normandale at its sole discretion. Edina shall. remove the building and other improvements now located on the Development Property as soon as reasonably possible after the date of this Contract. Edina shall not develop or permit the development of any wetlands on the Development . Property. Edina shall use (from the date hereof until termination of this Contract or closing of the transaction contemplated hereby) the Development Property for a "qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall remove all of its personal property from the Development Property prior to Closing. 7. Representations and Warranties. 7.1 Normandale represents and warrants to Edina that Normandale is duly organized, qualified and in good standing, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract. Normandale will indemnify Edina, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Edina, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including; reasonable attorneys' fees, that Edina incurs'because of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. 7.2 Edina represents and warrants to Normandale'as follows: 7.2.1 Existence; Authority. Edina is duly organized municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract. 7.2.2 Wells. Edina represents that there are no "Wells" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. §103I on the Development Property. 7.2.3 Comprehensive Plan. Edina represents that Edina has amended its Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Proper t v as office. Edina will indemnify Normandale, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Normandale, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, 2 including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Normandale incurs because' of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Normandale is purchasing the Development Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Edina or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Development, Property "as is, where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties, representations and covenants herein contained. 8. Covenants. 8.1 Hazardous Substances. Edina shall not and shall not permit any toxic or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined in any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the environment) to be generated, treated, stored or disposed of, or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Development Property. 8.2 Subdivision. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina will, at Edina's sole expense, promptly commence and thereafter diligently proceed to complete prior to the Closing Date a division of the Development Property from the balance of the Property in accordance with all applicable laws. No person other than Edina shall be required to pay any monies or make any dedications to Edina in connection with such division in satisfaction of any park or open space, or similar, dedication requirements or otherwise except as provided in this Contract. All charges for preparation of, review of, and filing and recording of, a final plat or. Registered Land Survey to divide the Development Property from the balance of the Property shall be paid by, Edina, except that at Closing, Normandale shall pay to Edina one -half of the actual costs paid by Edina to a surveyor to prepare the plat or Registered Land Survey, if required. 8.3 Reza Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Normandale shall, at Normandale's sole expense, within thirty (30) days after the exercise of the Purchase Option W request, apply and petition for rezoning of the Development Property to Subdivision POD -1 (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) so that Normandale can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings (a) with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross floor area is defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) for all buildings on the Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to setback lines as shown on Exhibit, C attached hereto and made a part hereof, .which 7 restrictions and limitations set forth in the foregoing subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) are hereby imposed for the benerit of Edina, and (ii) submit all information, documentation and other material necessary for Edina to evaluate, consider and act upon Normandale's request, application and petition for such rezoning. Normandale agrees to comply with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of Edina, including but not limited to any required plat or registered land survey, with respect to such rezoning. Edina shall join in any such rezoning request, application or petition if required by the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. Edina hereby waives the requirement that any sign be installed on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning; provided, however, that Edina reserves the right to install any such sign on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning. No fees will be charged to Normandale by Edina in connection with such rezoning. 8.4 Maintenance. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina shall maintain the Development Property and neither Normandale nor any other person or party shall have the right to use the Development Property for any purpose unless agreed to and approved by Edina. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina shall not construct any structures on the Development Property that cost in the aggregate in excess $20,000. 8.5 Termination and Gift. In the event Normandale does not exercise the Purchase Option before the expiration of the Purchase Option Term, the Purchase Option shall, without further action or demand, terminate and upon the termination of the Purchase Option, Edina shall issue a resolution for the Fair Market Value of the Development Property, as of the date of the termination of the Purchase Option as a gift from Normandale to Edina. For purposes of this Contract "Fair Market Value of the Development Property" means the cash price the seller of the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to sell the Development Property, would receive from the buyer of the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to buy the Development Property, taking into consideration then current conditions and the marketplace for comparable transactions and assuming buyer could have bought same pursuant to the provisions of this Contract and such provisions were effective to allow such purchase. 8.6 Improvements. In determining what, if any, improvements must be made in connection with the development of the Development Property, Edina shall apply normal and customary processes, procedures and standards and will not treat the Development Property any differently than other similar developments in Edina recognizing that to a certain extent each development is unique. Rl 8.7 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. During the Purchase Option Term, Normandale shall have the right, at Normandale's sole cost and expense, before any delinquency occurs to contest, by appropriate proceedings conducted diligently and in good faith, the real estate taxes and any special assessments affecting the Development Property provided that (i) Normandale shall have given prior written notice to Edina of Normandale's intent to so contest, (ii) Normandale shall not postpone the payment of any such tax or special assessments for such length of time as shall permit the Development Property, or any lien thereon created by such item being contested, to be sold, or for any penalty or interest to be imposed or to accrue, for the nonpayment thereof, and (iii) such contest shall not interfere with the use or occupancy of the Development Property or any part thereof. 8.8 Access and Inspection. Upon Normandale's exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina shall allow Normandale, and Normandale's agents, access to the Development Property without charge and at all reasonable times for the purpose of Normandale's investigation and testing the same. Edina shall make available to Normandale and Normandale's agents without charge copies of all plans and specifications; records, maps, soil tests, engineering studies, inventories, environmental reports, permits and correspondence in Edina's possession relating to Hazardous Substances affecting the Development Property, and the right to interview employees of Edina who may have knowledge of such matters. Normandale shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall restore the Development Property to as nearly as possible the condition it was in immediately prior to such investigation and testing, and shall hold Edina and the Development Property harmless from all costs and liabilities relating to Normandale's activities except such liabilities arising solely out of information produced or obtained as a result of Normandale's activities. 8.9 Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Edina acknowledges and agrees that the preliminary approval of the subdivision of the Development Property frorn the balance of the Property involves a planned and staged development referred to in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 3c. Therefore, Edina determines it to be reasonable and appropriate that during the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or 0,A- termination of this Contract, the subdivision shall not be deemed abandoned or withdrawn or of no effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. 8.10 Berm. In the event Normandale acquires the Development Propert. , Normandale agrees (a) not to remove or alter the berm, or any living shrubs, trees and other plants thereon, shown on the plan (the "Berm Plan ") attached hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof without obtaining the prior written consent and approval of Edina and (b) to replace in accordance -with the Berm Plan any shrubs, trees and other plants thereon that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to such an extent that based upon a standard of reasonableness both as to function and appearance any such shrub, tree or other plant should be replaced. 9. Termination of Restrictions and Limitations. 9.1 If Normandale has complied with all requirements of this Contract and the Zoning Ordinances of Edina and if Edina within 120 days after the exercise of the Purchase Option shall not have completed a nonappealable division of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the rezoning of the Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is not obtained, or both, the restrictions and limitations set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 8.3 hereof shall terminate. Such termination shall not reduce or waive any of Edina's obligations under this Contract. 10. Casualty; Condemnation. If eminent domain proceedings are threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Development Property after Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall immediately give notice to Normandale, and Normandale shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving notice within thirty (30) days after Edina's notice if given. If Normandale shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Edina shall assign to Normandale all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. 11. Broker's Commission. Edina and Normandale represent to each other that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or commissions resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Contract, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 12. Assignment. ment. Edina may not assign its rights under this Contract without obtaining the prior written consent of Normandale. Normandale may assign its rights under this Contract and the consent of Edina to such assignment shall not be required; provided, however, that any such assignment shall not relieve Normandale of its obligations under this Contract. 13. Survival. All of the terms of this Contract and warranties and representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing. 10 14. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable overnight courier, properly addressed as follows: If to Normandale: Normandale Golf, Inc. c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law P. O. Box 150 Minnetonka, MN 55440 Fax #: (612) 938 -3346 If to Edina: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager Fax #: (612) 927 -7645 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing, transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. 15. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Contract are for convenience only, are not a part of this Contract, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Contract. This written Contract constitutes the complete agreement between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase the Development Property and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase the Development Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this Contract, and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. This Contract binds and benefits the parties and their successors and assigns. This Contract has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. Time is of the essence. 16. Recce Edina and Normandale agree that this Option and Development Contract or a short form thereof shall be recorded at Normandale's expense. 16. Remedies. If Normandale defaults under this Contract, Edina shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to Normandale. If 11 Normandale fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this Contract will terminate, time being of the essence of this Contract. The termination of this Contract will be the sole remedy available to Edina for such default by Normandale, and Normandale will not be liable for damages or specific performance. If Edina defaults under this Contract, this provision does not preclude Normandale from seeking and recovering from Edina damages for nonperformance or specific performance of this Contract. Edina and Normandale have executed this Contract as of the date first written above. Date of Signature ,19 Date of Signature ,19 12 NORMANDALE GOLF, INC. By— Its CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor And Its Manager STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,1992, by the of NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,1992, by and , the mayor and manager, respectively, of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 13 EXHIBIT A (To Option and Development Contract) Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances): 1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121. EXHIBIT B - (To Option and Development Contract) (Development Property) That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota. lying South of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30 seconds .East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 31 minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating. EXHIBIT D - (To Option and Development Contract) (Storm Sewer Easement) EASEMENT FOR STORM SEWER THIS INSTRUMENT, made as of the day of by and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Grantor ") and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "City "). WITNESSETH; That the Grantor, in consideration of One and No /100 Dollars ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, does grant, bargain, sell, convey and warrant to the City a non - exclusive easement in perpetuity for underground storm sewer and drainage system purposes, and including the right of the City and its contractors, agents and representatives, to enter for the purpose of installing, constructing, maintaining, altering, repairing; reinstalling and reconstructing an underground storm sewer and drainage system, including, without limitation, underground pipes, surface level catch basins, surface level man holes, surface level storm sewer grates and openings and other surface level and underground appurtenances to service, maintain and operate the underground system, in, under and across the property situate in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit I attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. In the event it is necessary for the City to remove, injure or destroy a n landscaping, trees, sodding, sprinkler systems, irrigation systems, driveways, walkways, curbs or similar items or improvements in connection with the permitted use or uses of the easement as granted hereby, the City, without cost or charge to Grantor, shall restore, replace or repair such improvements to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the extent reasonably possible; provided, however, that trees removed or destroyed in excess of three inches caliper may be replaced by City with trees of at least two incheN caliper. Grantor agrees that it shall not construct any buildings or other structures which would materially interfere with the use of the easement granted hereby to City. The easement granted hereby shall not be deemed to prohibit Grantor from installing within the easement area (i) landscaping, irrigation system.. driveways, walkways, signs and curbs (in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances); and (ii) structures other than those listed at (i) above, provided that such installation is done in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances and such structures do not materially interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of the easement area by City. The Grantor also understands and agrees that City has no duty to maintain any such installations made by or for Grantor and now or hereafter within the easement area granted hereby. If Grantor, in connection with such installation, shall remove, injure or destroy any of the underground or surface portions of the storm sewer and drainage system then on or under the easement area, Grantor, without cost or charge to City, shall restore, replace or repair such system to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the extent reasonably possible. The provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on, and inure to the benefit of, Grantor and City, and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused this instrument to be duly executed the day and year first above written. NORMANDALE GOLF, INC. M Its And Its STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,19 , by and , the and respectively, of NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 P A : I am (To Storm Sewer Easement) That part of Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, said point also being the Southwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence West along the South line of said Tract R 10.00 feet, thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 338.98 feet; thence West 36.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 10.00 feet; thence East 36.00 feet to a point on a line 10.00 feet West of and parallel with the West line of said Tract A; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 134.93 feet; thence East 10.00 feet to point on the Northerly extension of the West line of said Tract A; thence South along the West line of said Tract A and its Northerly extension 483.91 feet to the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, the point of commencement, and there terminating. EXHIBIT E - (To Option and Development Contract) ( "Berm Plan ") EXHIBIT C - (Survey Requirements) These items are to be included and shown on the survey: 1. The complete and correct legal description of the Land as shown on the title insurance commitment or preliminary title report. 2. The location of all recorded easements and unrecorded easements ascertainable by an inspection of the Land, which benefit or burden the Land. (Note: All recorded easements are to be identified by a document recording number or other document reference.) 3. The location of all adjoining streets, roads, highways and alleys, with names, rights -of -way widths and distances from the Land noted. 4. The location of public access to the Land. 5. A directional indicator. 6. The street address of any existing improvements, if known. 7. The dimensions of the Land and the dimensions and locations of existing improvements as measured in both directions from property lines. 8. Location of walkways, if any. 9. Location of ingress and egress (curb cuts and driveways). 10. The perimeter dimensions of existing improvements. 11. Interior lot lines, if any. 12. The location of existing connections and on site utility and service lines for natural gas, electricity, water, and sanitary and storm sewers. 13. The area of the Land. 14. The boundaries of the Land, with directions and distances of the boundary lines and showing discrepancies, if any, between measured, platted and recorded directions and distances. 15. The following certification of surveyor. (Seal) " I certify to [insert names of Buyer, Seller, and Title] and to their heirs, successors and assigns, that I have surveyed, on the ground, the property legally described hereon; that said legal description is correct, complete and accurate; that this plat of survey is true and correct in all respects; that the size, dimensions and locations of all of the boundaries of the property (including the directions and distances of all boundary lines, and any discrepancies between measured, platted and recorded directions and distances), buildings and other improvements, recorded and visible unrecorded easements, streets, roads, means of public access, rights -of -way, and utility lines and connections which affect said property are correctly and accurately shown hereon; and that there are no encroachments, overlaps, gaps, easements, streets, roads, rights -of -way or improvements which affect the property, which are not shown hereon." Dated this day of ,19 [LICENSED SURVEYOR'S NAMEI By [ORIGINAL SIGNATUREI + MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE FDHIIBIT D PLEASE TYPE ALL INFORMATION Cn A. PROPERTY SELLER INFORMATION Seller's last name , Date of closing the sale s Total number-of wells M M D D Y Y B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Attach a legal description of property in addition to�'the applicable property information requested below. J 'House number Street. name Type Direction City Zip code If applicable. I,, , Addition am ne Block number Lot number C. PROPERTY BUYER INFORMATION , First name MI Last•name , , , , , , , , I , , 1 , , , , . , , , , , , 1 . , . , , , . , . , , . 1 Company name if applicable Address Address City State Zip code Phone number D. CERTIFICATION BY SELLER I aw" that the Wrkwma*m provided on thb oerllAoat,s Is a=am and oomplet' w the beet of my wwwledge. Signature of Sailor or Designated Rsprssentattve of Sauer Dame E. CERTIFICATION BY BUYER h the absence of a WWI ngnaturs. B» buyer. or pweon auftft d to so on b~ of the DuY� may sign this well cute. No signature is mqufnd by fw buyer If ft seller hoe signed above. Bated on disdoaure Information prfded to me by the felbr or other avallabM trdartn MW, 1 ow" that tM Urhorrruaon ortmdsd above is aoourste and oompbte m the an of my wow"". Signature of Buyer or Designated Aspreavamve of Buyer DIM F. CONTRACT FOR DEED PROPERTY TRANSFERS DEED ONLY The buyer, or person authodrod to sot on bsW of ft buyer, must sign a won owdoeure cwimaae for W warranty oeew green in fumumem of a awmaa for deed. f titan are no iatown weue an the property, ohealt 1M bas below. 1 as" %@1 1 la, am of no *vela on the property desortbed herein. Signature of Buyer or Designated Represenranve of Buyer Dots NINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE WELL INFORMATION an Fill out a separate fors for each well located on the property. A. WELL LOCATION County . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I 1 , 1 , l , , 1 , J--L" , == , , , , , , J—&" 4--L—L" Townw* nem� Ouerrr QWW Ouew Querw 8e� -tlon no. T . F"e „o. B. WELL USE INFORMATION ' I. , , , , L_," Unique well number (if known). 2. Well depth (feet). 3. Year of construction. 4. _ Well type (Me vn.). 5. Permit number if current maintenance permit exists. 6. Well is: ❑ in use m ❑ not in use m ❑ sealed by licensed well contractor (3) Year well was sealed. C. SKETCH MAP Please use the space below to sketch the location of the well. Include distances from fixed reference points such as streets and buildings. Ulametlw pmvkW an 90 bnn is cWsW .a d publb W#g"nS*M under hLva oft 9biWM. CAepw I& 4 td m (Description of above ground tank) EMHIBIT F - (Development Property) That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota lying South of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30 seconds East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet, thence North 87 degrees 31 minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating. EXHIBIT G - (Berm Plan) 919A OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS OPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ( "Contract ") is made as of the day of September, 1992 (the "Commencement Date "), by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Edina "), and NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, ( "Normandale "). BACKGROUND: A. Edina has purchased from Normandale certain real property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the 'Property"). B. Edina has given preliminary approval to a subdivision of that part of the Property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Development Property ") from the balance of the Property and certain conditions have been imposed in connection with such approval. C. Edina and Normandale desire to enter into this Contract not only with Edina as owner, but as provided in Section 810 of the Ordinance of Edina and in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 2a., 3c. and 4b.(6). AGREEMENT: In consideration of the foregoing premises and other valuable consideration, Edina and Normandale agree as follows: 1. Purchase Option. Edina grants to Normandale an option ('Purchase Option ") to purchase the Development Property for One Dollar ($1.00). Normandale shall exercise such Purchase Option, if at all, by giving a written notice to Edina after the Commencement Date and before the sixteenth (16th) anniversary of the Commencement Date ( "Purchase Option Term "). In the event Normandale fails to exercise the Purchase Option during the Purchase Option Term this Contract shall, without further action or demand, terminate and be of no further force or effect. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, Edina and Normandale shall each execute and deliver to the other an agreement (the "Termination Agreement ") in recordable and customary form evidencing the termination of this Contract. 2. Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by the Purchase Option (the "Closing ") will occur on the date (the "Closing Date" which is the earlier of (a) the date 120 days after the date upon which Normandale exercises the Purchase Option or (b) the date that is the later of (i) the date five (5) business days after Normandale has waived or been deemed to have waived all Objections (as defined in paragraph 5.2 of this Contract) or such Objections have been cured by Edina, or (ii) the date five (5) days after Edina completes a nonappealable division of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract, or (iii) the date five days after the rezoning of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is obtained. The Closing will take place at 9:00 a.m. local time at the office selected by Edina. Edina agrees to deliver possession of the Development Property to Normandale on the Closing Date. 3. Closing Documents. 3.1 On the Closing Date, Edina shall execute and deliver to Normandale the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Normandale: 3.1.1 Deed. Limited Warranty Deed conveying the Development Property to Normandale, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted Encumbrances hereafter defined and except for the building size and height restrictions and set back requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract which shall- be set forth in said Limited Warranty Deed and'shall run with the title to the Development Property and every part thereof and interest therein and shall be binding upon all persons, parties and entities having or acquiring any right, title, interest or estate in the Development Property, or any part thereof. 3.1.2 FIRPTA Affidavit. A non - foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations. 3.1.3 Affidavit. An Affidavit duly executed and acknowledged by Edina, in customary form, relative to judgments, state and federal tax liens, mechanic's liens and outstanding interests in the Development Property. 3.1.4 Certificate of Real Estate Value. A duly executed Certificate of Real Estate Value in customary form. 3.1.5 Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. The owner's duplicate certificate of title regarding the Development Property. 2 3.1.6 Termination. Termination of Memorandum of this Contract which may have been recorded. 3.1.7 Other Documents. Except as otherwise provided, all other documents reasonably determined to be necessary to transfer the Development Property to Normandale free and clear of all encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances pursuant to the provisions hereof. 3.2 On the Closing Date, Normandale shall (a) execute, deliver and grant to Edina a perpetual, non - exclusive easement for storm sewer purposes in substantially the form and content of, and over, under and across the portion of the Development Property described in, the easement attached hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof and (b) execute and deliver an agreement in recordable form evidencing and confirming the agreement set forth in paragraph 8.9 hereof. 4. Prorations. Edina and Normandale agree to the following pro- rations and allocation of costs regarding this Contract: 4.1 Title Insurance and Closing; Fee. Normandale will pay all costs of the Title Commitment, the title policy issued pursuant to the Title Commitment and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title. 4.2 Deed Tax. Edina shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection with this transaction and one -half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title. 4.3 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. 4.3.1 Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes against the Development Property payable in 1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or before Closing. Real estate taxes against the Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Except as provided in paragraph 4.3.3 hereof, all real estate taxes against the Development Property appropriately pro -rated on an area basis if the Development Property is part of a larger tax parcel payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Normandale except that Edina shall pay any real estate taxes 3 related to; improvements not located on the Development Property. 4.3.2 Special Assessments. All installments of special assessments levied against all or any part of the Development Property payable in .1992 and all calendar years thereafter to and including the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Edina on or before Closing. All installments of special assessments levied against all or any part of the Development Property payable in the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be pro rated as of the Closing Date. All installments of special assessments levied or pending against all or any part of the Development Property payable in the calendar years after the calendar year in which the Closing Date occurs shall be paid in full by Normandale. In the event any such special assessment is levied and assessed against property which includes the Development Property, such special assessment shall be equitably divided and allocated so that the special assessments levied against the Development Property are separate from the special assessments against the balance of the property of which the Development Property is a part. Edina agrees that no special assessments shall be levied by Edina against the Development Property due to the division of the Property pursuant to Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the development by Edina of a golf course on the Property. 4.3.3 Additional Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that the Development Property is now valued and assessed under Minnesota Statutes, § 273.112. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option within five (5) years after the date of this Contract, after the Closing Normandale assumes the full risk of the imposition against the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said § 273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall have no obligation to pay the same. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option more than five (5) years after the date of this Contract, Edina assumes the full risk of the imposition against the Development Property of additional taxes pursuant to said §273.112, and if such additional taxes are imposed against the Development Property, Edina shall pay the same. 4 4.4 Other Costs. All operating costs of the Property shall be allocated between Edina and Normandale as of the Closing Date, so that Edina pays that part of operating costs accruing before the Closing Date, and Normandale pays that part of operating costs accruing from and after the Closing Date. 4.5 Attorney's Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney's fees, except that a party defaulting under this Contract will pay the reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the nondefaulting party to enforce its rights hereunder. 5. Title Examination. Title Examination will be conducted as follows: 5.1 Edina's Title Evidence. Normandale shall, within twenty (20) days after the exercise of the Purchase Option, obtain a commitment ( "Title Commitment ") for an ALTA Form B 1970 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Real Property, deleting standard exceptions and including affirmative insurance regarding contiguity, appurtenant easements and such other matters as may be identified by Normandale, in the amount of the Fair Market Value of the Development Property (as defined in Paragraph 8.5 of this Contract), issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota ( "Title "). 5.2 Normandale's Objections. Within twenty (20) days after receiving the Title Commitment, Normandale will make written objections ' ( "Objections ") to the form and /or contents of the Title Commitment. Normandale's failure to make Objections within such time period will constitute waiver of Objections. The encumbrances listed on Exhibit A hereto, the building size and height restrictions and set back requirements set forth in paragraph 8.3 of this Contract (unless such restrictions and requirements shall terminate pursuant to paragraph 9.1 hereof), the real estate taxes and special assessments to be paid by Normandale pursuant to paragraph 4.3 hereof and any matter shown on such Title Commitment and not objected to by Normandale shall be a "Permitted Encumbrance" hereunder and not Objections. Edina will have 60 days after receipt of the Objections to cure the Objections, during which period the Closing will be postponed, if necessary. Edina shall correct any Objections. 5.3 Title Policy. Edina shall obtain for Normandale at Closing a title policy ( "Title Policy ") issued by Title pursuant to the Title Commitment, or a suitably marked -up Title Commitment, initialed by Title undertaking to issue a Title Policy in the form required by the Title Commitment as reasonably approved by Normandale at standard rates. 5 6. Operation Prior to Closing. Edina shall execute no contracts, leases or other agreements regarding the Development Property during the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the proper termination of this Contract, that are not terminable on or before the Closing Date, without the prior written consent of Normandale, which consent may be withheld by Normandale at its sole discretion. Edina shall remove the building and other improvements now located on the Development Property as soon as reasonably possible after the date of this Contract. Edina shall not develop or permit the development of any wetlands on the Development Property. Edina shall use (from the date hereof until termination of this Contract or closing of the transaction contemplated hereby) the Development Property for a "qualifying purpose" as such term is now or hereafter used under Minnesota Statutes §273.112 as now or hereafter amended. If Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall remove all of its personal property from the Development Property prior to Closing. 7. Representations and Warranties. 7.1 Normandale represents and warrants to Edina that Normandale is duly organized, qualified and in good standing, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract. Normandale will indemnify Edina, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Edina, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Edina incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. 7.2 Edina represents and warrants to Normandale as follows: 7.2.1 Existence; Authority. Edina is duly organized municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract. 7.2.2 Wells. Edina represents that there are no "Wells" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. §103I on the Development Property. 7.2.3 Comprehensive Plan. Edina represents that Edina has amended its Comprehensive Plan 1980 to show the Development Property as office. Edina wilt indemnify Normandale, its successors and assigns, against, and will hold Normandale, its successors and assigns, harmless from, any expenses or damages, 0 including reasonable attorneys' fees, that Normandale incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Normandale is purchasing the Development Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Edina or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Development Property "as is, where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties, representations and covenants herein contained. 8. Covenants. 8.1 Hazardous Substances. Edina shall not and shall not permit any toxic or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined in any state, local or federal law, regulation, rule, policy or order relating to the protection of the environment) to be generated, treated, stored or disposed of, or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Development Property. 8.2 Subdivision. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina will, at Edina's sole expense, promptly commence and thereafter diligently proceed to complete prior to the Closing Date a division of the Development Property from the balance of the Property in accordance with all applicable laws. No person other than Edina shall be required to pay any monies or make any dedications to Edina in connection with such division in satisfaction of any park or open space, or similar, dedication requirements or otherwise except as provided in this Contract. All charges for preparation of, review of, and filing and recording of, a final plat or Registered Land Survey to divide the Development Property from the balance of the Property shall be paid by Edina, except that at Closing, Normandale shall pay to Edina one -half of the actual costs paid by Edina to a surveyor to prepare the plat or Registered Land Survey, if required. 8.3 Rezoning. Upon exercise of the Purchase Option, Normandale shall, at Normandale's sole expense, within thirty (30) days after the exercise of the Purchase Option (i) request, apply and petition for rezoning of the Development Property to Subdivision POD -1 (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) so that Normandale can construct on the Development Property a building or buildings (a) with a total maximum aggregate of 110,000 square feet of gross floor area (as gross floor area is defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina) for all buildings on the Development Property, (b) of a height not in excess of an elevation of 861.0 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, plus the height of any roof -top mechanical equipment or devices serving any such building and (c) subject to setback lines as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof, which M restrictions and limitations set forth in the foregoing subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) are hereby imposed for the benefit of Edina, and (ii) submit all information, documentation and other material necessary for Edina to evaluate, consider and act upon Normandale's request, application and petition for such rezoning. Normandale agrees to comply with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of Edina, including but not limited to any required plat or registered land survey, with respect to such rezoning. Edina shall join in any such rezoning request, application or petition if required by the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. Edina hereby waives the requirement that any sign be installed on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning; provided, however, that Edina reserves the right to install any such sign on the Development Property in connection with such rezoning. No fees will be charged to Normandale by Edina in connection with such rezoning. 8.4 Maintenance. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina shall maintain the Development Property and neither Normandale nor any other person or party shall have the right to use the Development Property for any purpose unless agreed to and approved by Edina. During the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, Edina shall not construct any structures on the Development Property that cost in the aggregate in excess $20,000. 8.5 Termination and Gift. In the event Normandale does not exercise the Purchase Option before the expiration of the Purchase Option Term, the Purchase Option shall, without further action or demand, terminate and upon the termination of the Purchase Option, Edina shall issue a resolution for the Fair Market Value of the Development Property, as of the date of the termination of the Purchase Option as a gift from Normandale to Edina. For purposes of this Contract "Fair Market Value of the Development Property" means the cash price the seller of the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to sell the Development Property, would receive from the buyer of the Development Property, being willing but under no compulsion to buy the Development Property, taking into consideration then current conditions and the marketplace for comparable transactions and assuming buyer could have bought same pursuant to the provisions of this Contract and such provisions were effective to allow such purchase. 8.6 Improvements. In determining what, if any, improvements must be made in connection with the development of the Development Property, Edina shall apply normal and customary processes, procedures and standards and will not treat the Development Property any differently than other similar developments in Edina recognizing that to a certain extent each development is unique. E:3 8.7 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. During the Purchase Option Term, Normandale shall have the right, at Normandale's sole cost and expense, before any delinquency occurs to contest, by appropriate proceedings conducted diligently and in good faith, the real estate taxes and any special assessments affecting the Development Property provided that (i) Normandale shall have given prior written notice to Edina of Normandale's intent to so contest, (ii) Normandale shall not postpone the payment of any such tax or special assessments for such length of time as shall permit the Development Property, or any lien thereon created by such item being contested, to be sold, or for any penalty or interest to be imposed or to accrue, for the nonpayment thereof, and (iii) such contest shall not interfere with the use or occupancy of the Development Property or any part thereof. 8.8 Access and Inspection. Upon Normandale's exercise of the Purchase Option, Edina shall allow Normandale, and Normandale's agents, access to the Development Property without charge and at all reasonable times for the purpose of Normandale's investigation and testing the same. Edina shall make available to Normandale and Normandale's agents without charge copies of all plans and specifications, records, maps, soil tests; engineering studies, inventories, environmental reports, permits and correspondence in Edina's possession relating to Hazardous Substances affecting the Development Property; and the right to interview employees of Edina who may have knowledge of such matters. Normandale shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall restore the Development Property to as nearly as possible the condition it was in immediately prior to such investigation and testing, and shall hold Edina and the Development Property harmless from all costs and liabilities relating to Normandale's activities except such liabilities arising solely out of information produced or obtained as a result of Normandale's activities. 8.9 Preliminary Subdivision A1212roval. Edina acknowledges and agrees that the preliminary approval of the subdivision of the Development Property from the balance of the Property involves a planned and staged development referred to in Minnesota Statutes §462.358 Subd. 3c. Therefore, Edina determines it to be reasonable and appropriate that during the Purchase Option Term and, if Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, until the later of the Closing Date or the termination of this Contract, the subdivision shall not be deemed abandoned or withdrawn or of no effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Zoning Ordinance of Edina. 8.10 Berm. In the event Normandale acquires the Development Property, Normandale agrees (a) not to remove or alter the berm, or any living shrubs, trees and other plants thereon, shown on the plan (the "Berm Plan ") attached hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof without obtaining the prior written consent and 6 approval of Edina and (b) to replace in accordance with the Berm Plan any shrubs, trees and other plants thereon that may die or that may be damaged or destroyed to such an extent that based upon a standard of reasonableness both as to function and appearance any such shrub, tree or other plant should be replaced. 9. Termination of Restrictions and Limitations. 9.1 If Normandale has complied with all requirements of this Contract and the Zoning Ordinances of Edina and if Edina within 120 days after the exercise of the Purchase Option shall not have completed a nonappealable division of the Development Property as required by Paragraph 8.2 of this Contract or the rezoning of the Property as required by Paragraph 8.3 of this Contract is not obtained, or both, the restrictions and limitations set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 8.3 hereof shall terminate. Such termination shall not reduce or waive any of Edina's obligations under this Contract. 10. Casualty; Condemnation. If eminent domain proceedings are threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Development Property after Normandale exercises the Purchase Option, Edina shall immediately give notice to Normandale, and Normandale shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving notice within thirty (30) days after Edina's notice if given. If Normandale shall fail to give the notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Edina shall assign to Normandale all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. 11. Broker's Commission. Edina and Normandale represent to each other that they have dealt with no other brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction, and each agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or commissions resulting from their respective actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Contract, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 12. Assignment. Edina may not assign its rights under this Contract without obtaining the prior written consent of Normandale. Normandale may assign its rights under this Contract and the consent of Edina to such assignment shall not be required; provided, however, that any such assignment shall not relieve Normandale of its obligations under this Contract. 13. Survival. All of the terms of this Contract and warranties and representations herein contained shall survive and be enforceable after the Closing. 10 14. Notices. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be given by personal delivery upon an authorized representative of a party hereto; or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile copy followed by mailed notice; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable overnight courier, properly addressed as follows: If to Normandale: Normandale Golf, Inc. c/o James L. Tucker, Attorney at Law P. O. Box 150 Minnetonka, MN 55440 Fax #: (612) 938 -3346 If to Edina: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager Fax #: (612) 927 -7645 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of mailing, transmittal or deposit, as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is given by mailing, transmittal or deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing, transmittal or deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by giving notice of such change 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. 15. Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Contract are for convenience only, are not a part of this Contract, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Contract. This written Contract constitutes the complete agreement between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase the Development Property and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties with respect to Normandale's option to purchase the Development Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this Contract, and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. This Contract binds and benefits the parties and their successors and assigns. This Contract has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. Time is of the essence. 16. Recording. Edina and Normandale agree that this Option and Development Contract or a short form thereof shall be recorded at Normandale's expense. 16. Remedies. If Normandale defaults under this Contract, Edina shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to Normandale. If 11 Normandale fails to cure such default within 15 days of the date of such notice, this Contract will terminate, time being of the essence of this Contract. The termination of this Contract will be the sole remedy available to Edina for such default by Normandale, and Normandale will not be liable for damages or specific performance. If Edina defaults under this Contract, this provision does not preclude Normandale from seeking and recovering from -Edina damages for nonperformance or specific performance of this Contract. Edina and Normandale have executed this Contract as of the date first written above. NORMANDALE GOLF, INC. Date of Signature By Its ,19 Date of Signature ,19 CITY OF EDINA A By Its Mayor 12 And Its Manager STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,1992, by the of NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1 1992, by and , the mayor and manager, respectively, of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 13 Notary Public EXHIBIT A - (To Option and Development Contract) Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. Subject to (Permitted Encumbrances): 1. Snow fence easements as described in Book 358 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 16, and in Book 366 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 121. EXHIBIT B . (To Option and Development Contract) (Development Property) That part of Tract R, RLS #1050 Hennepin County, Minnesota lying South of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Tract S, RLS #1050; thence East along the North line of said Tract S on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 30 seconds East 320 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 26 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds east 90.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 31 minutes 34 seconds East 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds East 56.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 225.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East 80.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract A, RLS #1218 and there terminating. EXHIBIT C .� N89° 26' 43' E O°�'— — — (To Development Contract) Oz 225. 00' N86° 53' 37' E � o t �I� PROPOSED BUILDING SITE kid CONTAINS 6. 2 ACRES I ° I PROPOSED NORTH SETBACK LIMITS I / SCALE. in —80 R -577' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEV. 822.0 / TOP BUILDING 861.0 / I / I I I N. 77TH ST EXHIBIT D (To Option and Development Contract) (Storm Sewer Easement) EASEMENT FOR STORM SEWER THIS INSTRUMENT, made as of the day of , by and between NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Grantor ") and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "City "). WITNESSETH; That the Grantor, in consideration of One and No /100 Dollars ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, does grant, bargain, sell, convey and warrant to the City a non - exclusive easement in perpetuity for underground storm sewer and drainage system purposes, and including the right of the City and its contractors, agents and representatives, to enter for the purpose of installing, constructing, maintaining, altering, repairing, reinstalling and reconstructing an underground storm sewer and drainage system, including, without limitation, underground pipes, surface level catch basins, surface level man holes, surface level storm sewer grates and openings and other surface level and underground appurtenances to service, maintain and operate the underground system, in, under and across the property situate in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit I attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. In the event it is necessary for the City to remove, injure or destroy any landscaping, trees, sodding, sprinkler systems, irrigation systems, driveways, walkways, curbs or similar items or improvements in connection with the permitted use or uses of the easement as granted hereby, the City, without cost or charge to Grantor, shall restore, replace or repair such improvements to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the extent reasonably possible; provided, however, that trees removed or destroyed in excess of three inches caliper may be replaced by City with trees of at least two inches caliper. Grantor agrees that it shall not construct any buildings or other structures which would materially interfere with the use of the easement granted hereby to City. The easement granted hereby shall not be deemed to prohibit Grantor from installing within the easement area (i) landscaping, irrigation systems, driveways, walkways, signs and curbs (in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances); and (ii) structures other than those listed at (i) above, provided that such installation is done in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances and such structures do not materially interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of the easement area by City. The Grantor also understands and agrees that City has no duty to maintain any such installations made by or for Grantor and now or hereafter within the easement area granted hereby. If Grantor, in connection with such installation, shall remove, injure or destroy any of the underground or surface portions of the storm sewer and drainage system then on or under the easement area, Grantor, without cost or charge to City, shall restore, replace or repair such system to the condition as existed immediately prior to such removal, injury or destruction to the extent reasonably possible. The provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on, and inure to the benefit of, Grantor and City, and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused this instrument to be duly executed the day and year first above written. NORMANDALE GOLF, INC. By Its And Its STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,19 , by and , the and respectively, of NORMANDALE GOLF, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: DORSEY & WHITNEY (PFB) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 �f EXHIBIT I (To Storm Sewer Easement) That part of Tract R, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, said point also being the Southwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence West along the South line of said Tract R 10.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 338.98 feet; thence West 36.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 10.00 feet; thence East 36.00 feet to a point on a line 10.00 feet West of and parallel with the West line of said Tract A; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract A 134.93 feet; thence East 10.00 feet to point on the Northerly extension of the West line of said Tract A; thence South along the West line of said Tract A and its Northerly extension 483.91 feet to the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Tract R, the point of commencement, and there terminating. EXHIBIT E (To Option and Development Contract) ( "Berm Plan ") V (C) . MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 15, 1992 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Alison Fuhr Robert Sherman MEMBERS ABSENT: Craig Swanson OTHERS PRESENT: Mrs. Helen Clausen, 4258 West 56th Street Mr. Alan Ackerberg, 5117 Mirror Lakes Drive Mr. Dennis Berkowitz, 4624 West 56th Street Mr. Patrick Cronan, 6305 South Knoll Drive Ms. Kathy Colwell, 5517 Knoll Drive Ms. Martha Anderson, 6205 Parkwood Road Ms. Darla Parrague, 4529 West 56th Street Mr. Craig Wahl, 4520 West 56th Street Mr. Larry Lawson, 4516 West 56th Street Mrs. Renee Phelps, 6224 Knoll Drive Ms. Cynthia Ryan, 5501 Knoll Drive Ms. Donita Bunke, 5520 Knoll Drive Mr. Scott Fischmann, 6233 Idylwood Lane Mrs. Judy Berkowitz, 4624 West 56th Street Mr. Bob Ballintine, 4620 West 56th Street Mrs. Mary Ballintine, 4620 West 56th Street Mr. Bruce Johnson, 4601 West 56th Street Mrs. Barb Johnson, 4601 West 56th Street Ms. Ruth Miller, 6305 South Knoll Drive Mrs. Polly Kieper, 4608 West 56th Street Mr. Mark Kieper, 4608 West 56th Street STAFF PRESENT: Deputy Chief Leonard Kleven, Edina P.D. Mr. Stephen Marston, Edina P.D. Mr. Eric Felton, Edina P.D. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 2 (1) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 56th Street and St. John's Avenue to a four -way "STOP." Continued from August meeting ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Kleven began the discussion by reporting the .results of speed surveys taken in the area between August 26th and September 11th. Those surveys indicated a top speed of 43 miles per hour, and an 85th percentile for eastbound traffic of 29 miles per hour, and 31 miles per hour for westbound traffic. Mr. Marston reported that the West 56th Street /St. John's Avenue area has not been an active site for the Traffic Enforcement Unit, but his personal experience has shown that the drainage dip in the roadway on West 56th Street has a slowing effect on traffic. According Mr. Kleven, there have been no reportable accidents in the area during the past three years. Mr. Hoffman stated that, if the drainage dip is determined to be the problem, it can be corrected by removing the dip and adding two additional drainage basins. He added that some residents have indicated that the dip slows down traffic, while others believe motorists speed up to get past it. A number of residents appeared before the Committee to express their concerns regarding this issue: Mrs. Helen Clausen described West 56th Street as a "race course," and thought that at least one "STOP" sign on West 56th Street would slow down traffic. Mrs. Judy Berkowitz stated that her main concern lies with the speed of cars; they're travelling too fast, especially considering the number of children in the neighborhood. It is her belief that among the worst offenders are teenagers driving to and from school and school bus drivers. Mr. Bob Ballintine, a resident for eleven years, thought the drainage dip had been originally installed to act as a speed deterrent, but had not been successful as one. Mr. Hoffman replied that the dip had been put in for storm drainage, not speed control. At the time of installation, the Committee may have indicated that any subsequent traffic slowdown would be a beneficial by- product. Mr. Ballintine said that West 56th Street should be treated as a residential street, not a through street, and expressed his concerns for pedestrians, particularly those walking at night. Mr. Dennis Berkowitz summed up the issue as one of safety, both for neighborhood children and motorists. He said that West 56th Street is known as the "bump and fly" street by some motorists. He believed that one solution to the problem might be to rotate TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 3 the current "STOP" sign at St. John's Avenue to West 56th Street. Ms. Darla Parrague said the drainage dip has made the situation worse than it had been before. With the high traffic speeds, she doesn't allow her children to walk along West 56th Street. It is her belief that West 58th Street is the route that should carry traffic to the school, as none of those homes face the street. She strongly requested that "STOP" signs be placed on West 56th Street. Mr. Craig Wahl's greatest concern was the number of children who walk down West 56th Street. He concurred with the need for a "STOP" sign. Following the discussion with the residents, Mr. Hoffman summarized the issue and suggested two possible solutions: (1) relocating the 2 -way "STOP "; (2) and /or modifying the drainage dip. He added that the two highest speeds recorded on the surveys were by school busses, and that he had spoken with bus garage personnel about the problem, who advised him to have the Police Department ticket offending drivers in the future. Mrs. Fuhr made a two -part motion as follows: (1) to recommend that the current "STOP" signs on St. John's Avenue be rotated to West 56th Street. and (2) that the "dip" situation on West 56th Street be corrected by changing the drainage pattern. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Discuss traffic safety concerns in the Parkwood Knolls area. Continued from August meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by opening up the discussion to neighborhood residents, many of whom were present to address this issue: Mr. Pat Cronan, who contacted the Committee originally, expressed his concerns over the safety of the approximately 30 children, age 11 and younger, residing in the area. He noted the increased traffic moving north from Blake Road to Knoll Drive and South Knoll Drive has resulted in fast speeds and a "reckless disregard" for "STOP" signs. The problem, he said, is accentuated during the school year. He offered several recommendations: (1) attempt to reduce speed through the installation of 25- mile - per -hour advisory signage; (2) install "CAUTION - CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs; (3) erect an additional "STOP" sign at View Lane and South Knoll Drive to help slow down traffic; and (4) paint crosswalks on Knoll Drive, South Knoll Drive, and Schaefer Road. He also suggested that "NO TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 4 TURN" signage would help restrict travel for those motorists who are cutting through the area to get to and from Opus. Ms. Kathy Colwell, a resident for 25 years, noted her concerns about excessive speed. She felt that a 25- mile - per -hour advisory was necessary on all five intersecting streets, and requested a "STOP" sign at Knoll Drive and Schaefer Road. She repeated the request for a marked crosswalk at Knoll Drive and Schaefer Road. In order to counteract traffic shortcutting through Parkwood Knolls during the evening rush hour, she also suggested banning right turns for northbound Lincoln Drive at Dovre Drive from 4 -6 P.M. Mr. Hoffman reminded her that turn restrictions would affect residents as well as through traffic. He recalled that various diversionary techniques had been attempted in the area previously, but were eventually abandoned. Ms. Martha Anderson noted that motorists northbound on Blake Road are able to get up speed before entering Parkwood Knolls. If speeds in the area cannot be legally lowered to 25 miles per hour, she requested advisory signage to indicate the presence of children. Ms. Donita Bunke, a Knoll Drive resident, said that neighborhood children are afraid to ride bikes and play in the street. She said that crosswalks and cautionary signage should be in place as a reminder to motorists that the roadway is not a speedway. Ms. Cynthia Ryan believed that "STOP" signs have helped counteract the speed problem, but that the area is still dangerous for children. While many of the speeders are juvenile motorists, it was her opinion that many adults were speeding, too, and that many of them were not residents of the neighborhood. Mr. Scott Fischmann stated that traffic levels are increasing, and was aware that siphoning traffic off one street will only move it onto another. His greatest concern was speed, not volume, particularly for traffic eastbound on South Knoll Drive. He said that motorists failing to stop at "STOP" signs is another problem. He believed that 25- mile - per -hour advisory signage, additional "STOP" signs, and "CAUTION - CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs would help make a difference. Ms. Anderson noted that speeds have not been contained on Blake Road and Schaefer Road, and wondered if a dedicated enforcement effort, such as that undertaken on Interlachen Boulevard, would help lower speeds. Discussion followed about Minnesota's 30 -mile- per -hour limit, and Mr. Hoffman stated that the best way to alter that would be to contact state legislators and urge a change in the law. He then asked the residents what the rationale was for a crosswalk at the Knoll Drive /South Knoll Drive /Schaefer Road TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 5 intersection. They said the intersection is like a neighborhood park, a meeting place, and unlike other intersections in the area. Mr. Kleven noted that a speed analysis of the neighborhood had been put on hold until the Blake Road construction project is completed, to present a more accurate picture of traffic flow. Mr. Hughes moved to recommend the following: (1) improve visibility at the northeast quadrant of Schaefer Road and Knoll Drive: (2) install 25- mile -ver -hour advisory signs along the median area on Knoll Drive: (3) ask the Police Department to consider this area for the Traffic Enforcement Unit: and (4) defer further action on additional signage until the November meeting of the Traffic Safety Committee, after completion of the Blake Road construction project. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (Mr. Sherman had been called from the meeting earlier, thus the discrepancy in the vote total). (3) Discuss traffic safety concerns at Malibu Drive and Lincoln Drive. Requested by Gordon Hughes, Traffic Safety Committee. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman noted that, because construction has been completed on the eastern leg of Malibu Drive, Malibu now intersects with northbound /southbound Lincoln Drive. The resulting intersection has created a sharp angle which makes it difficult to see approaching traffic. It is, therefore, a candidate for a 4 -way "STOP" sign.- According to Mr. Hoffman, the only negative is that one of the legs is a downgrade. Mr. Hughes moved to recommend the installation of a 4 -way "STOP" sign at the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Malibu Drive. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (4) Discuss traffic safety concerns regarding highway ramp metering. Unscheduled agenda item requested by Alison Fuhr, Traffic Safety Committee. Mrs. Fuhr reported that she had recently ridden with the Edina Paramedics and had noted a problem concerning metering of the highway ramps. During peak traffic periods, the metering system makes access to the highway all but impossible for emergency vehicles, as traffic bunches up at the end of the ramps, blocking entrance. Mr. Marston noted that, while police vehicles are affected as well, the problem is not as severe because the smaller squad cars have greater maneuverability. Mr. Kleven stated that this issue had been discussed when metering was first proposed, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 6 and Fire Department officials had expressed concerns over possible blockage problems. Mr. Hughes asked whether it would be appropriate for the Committee to act on behalf of the Police and Fire Departments and present these concerns to the State. Mr. Hoffman suggested that perhaps the initial focus should be on the two public safety access points: West 50th Street and Highway 100, and Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown. Mr. Hughes moved to refer this item to the police and fire chiefs for evaluation. so they may consider what supporting role the Traffic Safety Committee could play in addressing metering concerns. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. None. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Mirror Lakes Drive and Northwood Drive. Continued from August meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Kleven began with an overview of the radar speed surveys conducted over a three -day period in September by the Police Department. A total of 172 vehicles were monitored during the survey, resulting in an 85th percentile of 30 miles per hour for northbound traffic, and 32 miles per hour for southbound vehicles. He recalled that the Committee had discussed speed in this area previously, as Mirror Lakes Drive is a natural shortcut for vehicles travelling between Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue. Mr. Marston reported that he had conducted nearly 3 -3/4 hours of traffic enforcement on Mirror Lakes Drive over a recent six -day period. He found no citable violations during that time. While some speeds were over 30 miles per hour, none were high enough to justify a citation. He also noted that above - ground pipeline construction on Northwood Drive may have skewed his data. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 15, 1992 Page 7 Mr. Alan Ackerberg, of 5117 Mirror Lakes Drive, appeared before the Committee to address what he considers to be a speed problem on Mirror Lakes Drive. It was his perception that only 40 -50 percent of the motorists follow the speed limit. He suggested that the installation of "STOP" signs at Northwood Drive, and also possibly Ayrshire Boulevard, would help alleviate speeding. Mr. Ackerberg questioned what had happened when this issue had come before the Committee previously. Mr. Hoffman answered that it had been a speed issue that time as well, in which residents believed their own neighbors were the violators. He said they had handled the situation in a unique way, by handing out pamphlets advising residents that they themselves were responsible for their speed problem. Mr. Ackerberg asked how the speed on Mirror Lakes Drive compared with speeds in other areas that had been surveyed, and Mr. Hoffman reported that the speed surveys show an average pattern. Mr. Kleven noted that there were no serious accident problems on Mirror Lakes Drive, although there had previously been a problem at the intersection with Interlachen Boulevard. He indicated a perception exists that speeds are high on Mirror Lakes Drive, but that such perceptions are not supported by the surveys. He also stated that safety issues raised by residents in the Chantrey Road/Ayrshire-Boulevard area are scheduled to be discussed by the Traffic Safety Committee at its October meeting. Mrs. Fuhr moved to defer this issue until the October meeting of the Committee, so that it might be discussed along with the Chantrey Road /Ayrshire Boulevard concerns. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hughes. Motion carried 3 -0. Edina Traffic Safety Committee l o e ' V / REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City council From: Francis Hoffmary P4 - - -- - - - - -- City Engineer (: Date: 21 September, 1992 Subject' Garage Construction at 5621 Wood Lane in St. Louis Park Access to Thielen Av( In Edina Recommendation: Agenda Item # ° • D Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ .Mgr. Recommends (❑ To HRA Q To Council Action 7 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Review attached material and comment if so desired. Info/Background- The property owners of 5621 Wood Lane, are seeking a variance in St. Louis Park to construct a new garage on their property. Edina is involved because the new garage access would be from Thielen Avenue in Edina, not Wood Lane in St. Louis Park as is currently the case. If the variance was granted in St. Louis Park, the owners at 5621 Wood Lane would be applying for a curb cut permit from Edina. The staff has reviewed the issue and would authorize the curb cut subject to the following conditions: (A) Property irons be located to ascertain that property abuts public right -of -way. (B) The curb cut be on the east portion of the north end of Thielen so that snow storage can continue on the west side of Thielen in winter and parking in the -summer. (C) Landscaping be maintained or improved to continue neighborhood aesthetics. The City Council may have no particular action to take other than review the issue unless Council directs staff not to approve a curb cut. NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE 5621 Wood Lane NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Zoning Appeals of St. Louis Park will meet at the City Hall on Thursday, September 24, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., and will conduct a public hearing on the application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck for a variance at 5621 Wood Lane for property described as follows, to -wit: The east 50 feet of Lot 8, Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside (Abstract), known as 5621 Wood Lane from the requirements of Sections 14- 108(1) and 14- 128(5) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a front yard setback of 15 feet on a double frontage lot instead of the required 35 feet for property located in the R -1, Single Family Residence District. Auxiliary Aides for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Office at 924 -2520 to make arrangements. . If you have questions, contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 924 -2575. BEVERLY FLANAGAN CITY CLERK Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: September 91 1992 — a lO i0 _ 30 ! i (3 t . i I i 1 I i Hou SE W 'i 0 4DT Fl *:u-. I �1 Z 14. o 0 CL v Ew i►Y fb M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works FROM: Kris Aaker DATE: September 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Variance Application for 5621 Woodlane, St. Louis Park Attached is a notice of public hearing for variance and corresponding site plan submitted upon request to the Planning Department for property located at 5621 Woodlane in St. Louis Park. A 20 foot setback variance is being requested to allow an 24'X 241(576 sq. ft.) detached garage to be located 15 feet from the south property boundary. The home owners are proposing to access the garage via a new driveway from Thielen Avenue in Edina. It would appear that access from Thielen requires review and comment of the city's Engineering Department. Please review and comment on the attached application. From a planning perspective there are a number of issues that may be raised regarding the plan including: 1. Was consideration given to replacing the existing garage with a 24' X 24' (576 sq. ft.) garage to be accessed from Woodlane? 2. Will the existing garage be removed or remain if the submitted plan is approved. 3. Regarding the current plan, it would be recommended that the driveway conform to Ordinance #1045 which pertains to the storage of vehicles within the R -1 zoning district. The ordinance states that automobiles; motorcycles; or trucks; pickups or vans under 9, 000 lbs. may be stored on a driveway not within 15 feet of.the curb. compliance with this ordinance would require that no parking take place on the new driveway. 4. Staff would recommend that the new driveway be narrower where it meets the street to reduce impact. 5. Staff would recommend any approval of the submitted plan include a requirement to landscape the south property boundary to reduce impact. PETITION TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR: 5621 WOOD LANE. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the city,council to not approve the applied variance at 5621 Wood Lane. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME_ (PRINTED) T►'�ua CU . Ne.�5or.1 in !V. f �' EL-r z F D40 rPF A/ IA)C: rba L . Z-VoIE ,W f Aj PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t�� PHONE 6,? 2tk� q,3S -93o 6 4 ;�Z L -rh ide vL q 2-5 . SZ60 A 3 y/ -7'14 «/ r- ti 11;�y- nW q -.57-5 r�.i -, 1,,;? u day -os�y CLO1a Ru6 113 C -�J- RAJ67' f1o1M,, �ef <� - elP1.isk iG�'i �rZ J 19? 9 9 6 7 �,, 143,76 Th1 /ELE -N &e Sao - 5g:Z/ L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t�� ga6c(� s� 3Y; 7�7�it•:.i d1��f 9zY ` 7 76 ! .y375- 1AIVA:niyrA� �a2_17 ?11!)i 113;c--l- i 24� GltiY V -176 �aGS� % / L xlAjlr-- 9ZZ- 37ZS CLO1a Ru6 113 C -�J- RAJ67' f1o1M,, �ef <� - elP1.isk iG�'i �rZ J 19? 9 9 6 7 �,, 143,76 Th1 /ELE -N &e Sao - 5g:Z/ L/&8O i #u cF..cit}t�� ga6c(� s� �`'�IZII�L��I �' .y375- NOTICE OF HEARING." ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE 5621 Wood Lane NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Zoning Appeals of St. Louis Park will meet at the City Hall on Thursday, September 24, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., and will conduct a public hearing on the application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck for a.variance at 5621 Wood Lane for property-described as follows, to -wit: The east 50 feet of Lot 8, Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside (Abstract), known as 5621 Wood Lane from the requirements of Sections 14- 108(1) and 14- 128(5) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a front yard setback of 15 feet on a double frontage lot instead of the required-35 feet for property located in the R- 1,'Single Family Residence District. Auxiliary Aides for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Office at 924 -2520 to make arrangements. If you have questions; contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 924 -2575. BEVERLY FLANAGAN CITY CLERK Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: September 9, 1992 TO : CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS & CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FROM : TIM & KRISTY EGAN, 4369 THIELEN, EDINA, MN. DATE : September 16,1992 REASON: Rebuttal to the application for variance of 5621 Wood Lane: It is our understanding that items 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 & IS of the St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance must be satisfied in order for a variance to be granted. Attached are the seven conditions set forth by St. Louis Park plus the applicants response to those conditions. Since, we live within 350 feet of the proposed variance we have taken the liberty to put our opinions in writing. They are the opinions of how our neighbors feel. 12) The only thing exceptional or unusual about 5621 Wood Lane is the fact that it has two front yards. It appears typical, with a 50 foot front and a 140 foot depth. If the property were "typical ", the applicants would be applying for a variance to build a garage in their "back yard" with access from Wood Lane. We have no problem with such a proposal if the existing landscape on Thielen were left alone. We find it difficult to see where the applicants suffer "undue hardship ". In the applicants response they admit that it wasn't until last year they recognized that access from Thielen was even a option. They bought a home seven years ago with a single car garage and the hope of building a double garage in the future. They did not buy the house with they idea they would build a garage with access from Thielen. All homes on Thielen have the required 35 foot setback to their homes and garages. Street parking for north end of Thielen residents will be difficult because of an east side fire hydrant. 13) Granted, 5621 Wood Lane is peculiar with its two front yards, but we can't see why Thielen needs to become an alley for their garage. 14) It is not necessary to open up Thielen for the applicants to preserve the enjoyment of their lot. You can't miss something you didn't have. 15) Future use of the proposed variance is a major concern of all Thielen residents. Currently there are fourteen children under the age of twelve on the block. Who is to say what the future owners of 5621 Wood Lane would be like. We currently have cars who do not notice the Dead End sign as they enter Thielen, even though it is pretty obvious. Most of these confused drivers turn around at one of the three driveways at the end of our street. Opening up the end of the street will increase our confused drivers. Plus many of them may drive faster once the reflectors are taken down. Any additional traffic is unwarranted and dangerous. From the proposed plan it appears that the applicants will need to back into a Thielen driveway in order to turn around, which could prove hazardous. 16) The proposed variance will change the character of Thielen Ave. All the Thielen residents we have talked to felt they bought homes on a Dead End. Putting a garage 15 feet from the street is hardly in character with our block. The closest garage on Thielen complies with the 35 foot setback from the street. There is no question approval of this variance will negatively impact the value of our homes. We have had a chance to review the applicants proposal which includes only a rough footprint of the site. Nowhere do the applicants include a accurate site plan and survey, an elevation of the proposed garage, or a list of construction materials. We are concerned that the absence of such information may inaccurately reflect the true aesthetic nature of the structure. We are not assured that the garages will be in keeping with the character of the homes on Thielen. 17) We are not sure what being "contrary to the intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan" means. So we can't respond to this section. 18) There is no hardship in the applicants present scenario. They bought a home with a single car garage. They want to build a new two car garage. That's fine as long as it doesn't require access from Thielen. The applicants intent is a convenience and economic request. There is no hardship. Metro 2015 Two Scenarios of the Twin Cities Area in 2015 it Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 291 -6359 TDD 291 -0904 Publication No. 640 -92 -077 July 7, 1992 Printed on Recycled Paper Introduction- These scenarios are pictures of what the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area could be like in the year 2015. They were sketched by two members of the Metropolitan Council's planning staff, Michael Munson and Hal Freshley, as part of the Council's "Metro 2015" project. The Council embarked on Metro 2015 to shape a consensus in the metropolitan community on 25 -year goals in six areas considered crucial to the region's future success - -the economy, governance, transportation, telecommunications, education and quality of life. Later this year, the Council will begin working on strategies to carry out the goals. The scenarios grow out of the planners' personal views and informed speculation about the future. They do not necessarily reflect the Council's vision of the region in the years ahead; that is described in the Council's discussion paper Metro 2015: Vision and Goals. The scenarios are nonetheless useful; they can offer insights that are sometimes the most compelling because they come from a personal perspective. Munson's scenario draws on the categories the Council has identified as being major factors in shaping the region's future. Freshley uses somewhat more general categories: the regional economy, work life, community life and personal life. Munson writes his scenario as if looking ahead from the present (for example, "...most of the already developed region will not look a, whole lot different "). Freshley writes his as if the year 2015 has already arrived (for example, "Of the region's historically strong businesses, food processing and biomedical technology have continued into this century."). rY• )- Scenarios can be useful in talking about the future, not because planners can predict it, but because such pictures can help a community decide what kind of a future it wants. Spinning a scenario suggests to people that the future just doesn't happen, that people have power to shape it. The Metro Council hopes the scenarios will help stimulating thinking about the region's future. Big Changes, Small Changes by Michael Munson If I were deciding where to go for a vacation, I might want a fairly detailed and graphic description of the alternatives. Or I might prefer to be surprised. If I really hate the place, I can always leave and go someplace else. If we thought about the future in the same way, we would probably want to reduce the element of surprise--given all the bad things that can happen to people or the societies they form. Although we can't predict the future very well, we can at least set forth goals about what we would like to see happen and work toward achie► -ing them. One way to do this in a more tangible or compelling way is with scenarios -- creating a more graphic vision of the possible future. My scenario is not intended to be either positive or negative- -but thought provoking, or perhaps just plain provoking. It does not try to give a comprehensive picture, but just a few specific glimpses of one person's speculation about the ftttttre in each of the Council's six goal areas. To make them more tangible and compelling, they are written with more "wills" than "coulds " - -as if the author had liule doubt about them coining to pass. But considering I've been making demographic forecasts for nearly three decades, there is only one thing I am certain of about the future - -that is we cannot predict it. The purpose of providing a scenario is to help people devise plans that will enable them to reach the goals embedded in their vision of the future. The question facing the people of the Twin Cities Area is: Can we agree on what we want the future to be, and then figure out how to make it occur? It's a question worth considering, because, unlike a vacation destination, we cannot pack up and leave a future we don't like. 2 The Look of the Region The most basic element of a vision for the region is what it will look like in the future. Assuming we can't afford to abandon or replace most of what's already been built, most of the already developed region will not look a whole lot different. There may be some very visible and important exceptions, but if placed on a map, these would occupy a very small share of the region's area. Where the look of the region will change most is in areas converted from vacant or low- intensity uses to urban (mostly residcntia1)_uses. These new areas will, however, look a lot like the adjacent developed areas -- varying mostly with regional prosperity. If the region becomes poorer, brick facades will be replaced by aluminum siding on smaller and fewer new homes that are built. The proportion of new housing that is apartment buildings will also increase. If the region prospers, new homes will be bigger and there will be more of them (and they'll still have brick facades). The most important fact is that, unless we become another Dallas or Phoenix or Atlanta - -the earth tilts on its axis and we become part of the Sun Belt, there is going to be less development change in the next 25 years than there was in the previous 25. That is because the large "baby- boom" generation has already entered the housing market, and now the housing market must depend on the much smaller baby -bust generation for its growth. In addition, we have presently overbuilt retail and commercial development to such an extent that some of the next 25 years will be spent just using what's on the ground. This will initially limit the ability of the region's few new freeways to attract major new commercial developments within this time frame. Although numbers do not create a very tangible vision in most people's minds, they are often the quickest and most unambiguous way to describe a situation. This is the case with respect to regional growth. In 1965, the region had just under 500,000 housing units (homes and. apartment units). The next 25 years saw an enormous increase, about 425,000 new units added. From 1990 until 2015, the Council's recent and fairly optimistic forecasts anticipate about 290,000 new housing units being constructed. That number is a sizeable gain but substantially less than in the previous 25 years. Furthermore, this growth is being added to a region that is almost twice as large as it was in 1965. This lesser growth amount will thus be mostly distributed in a much larger ring surrounding the current developed area. These new homes and the related commercial and industrial development will fit comfortably within the existing developing suburbs -- established suburbs such as Brooklyn Park, Eden Prairie, Eagan, and Woodbury, and emerging suburbs such as Andover, Chanhassen and Lakeville. The Regional Economy The fate of the region's economy is critical to virtually every aspect of a future scenario, and it is one of the most difficult to forecast. Nevertheless, the Twin Cities economy has remained relatively stable in its relationship to the U.S. economy for decades. If there are no major economic shifts nationally, there is no good reason to expect the region's economic health to change much. Our geographic isolation is diminishing as telecommunications supplants transportation as the critical access factor in the emerging Information Age. Despite long - standing concerns about the business climate, the Twin Cities' diverse economy should help us maintain our economic strength. But the Twin Cities Area will need to maintain both a real and perceived high quality of life in order to offset our climatic liabilities. Equally important will be the region's ability to function effectively in a global economy. I believe the region will be able to achieve these goals. Building strong economic ties with Japan will be one of the ways we will enhance our global competitiveness. Significant changes economically, either up or down, would so alter the course of events that the Metro Council would need to start over in its "visioning" process. Prosperity might cause us to just sit back and enjoy the "surprises" brought by the future, or it could give us the ability to solve problems we've only been able to give futile lip - service to in the past. The prospects of economic collapse raise such horrifying visions of social turmoil and rampant demagoguery that I don't want to think about it. The lackluster economic trends of the past two decades will continue through 2015 with the usual ups and downs, but the middle class (still the majority of the population) will have adjusted to it. In fact, many will stop fretting over their failure to continuously increase their very comfortable standard of living, and work to find ways of equitably sharing the economic wealth of the nation with an underclass everyone agrees has grown much too large. The result will be a stronger economy, improvements in everybody's economic status and a significant diminution of the current social problems -- crime, drugs, family disintegration, etc. The Twin Cities Area and the state will lead the nation, by example, in bringing this change about. Another future economic outcome to look for is the impact of the continuing changes in the production and marketing of consumer goods - -that is, retailing. What will people want, who'll be making it and how will it be sold? Advances in telecommunications, narrower marketing, just -in -time inventorying and increasing desires for convenience will result in a return to a smaller scale of retailing at a neighborhood scale. Clothing can be ordered through an electronic catalog that contains a customer's three - dimensional image. The computer will select styles that will fit and flatter the customer -- although you can, at your peril, override the computer. These changes will seriously challenge the major regional centers, which will have to find more ways than just shopping to attract customers. Their success will depend on tapping people's needs to come together. Governance Governance is an area that will not see much change in terms of the jurisdictional map of the Twin Cities Area. Because of our relatively high tolerance of government, its relatively high level of performance and lack of genuine crises, there is not sufficient impetus to erase the crazy quilt of 19th century political boundaries. However, by 2015 the number of cooperative efforts among jurisdictions and among different levels of government will have become so numerous and effective that the need for restructuring government in a formal way is not viewed as necessary- -and that's when it will start to occur. Transportation The real impetus for transportation improvements in the Twin Cities Area won't come from trumped up fears of gridlock- - most of us have heard newcomers and visitors laugh at our complaints about congestion. Transportation improvements will stem from our coming to grips with the fact that the Twin Cities Area is climatically challenged. We will continue to shift from a mentality that responds only reactively to crisis (real or 4 contrived) toward approaches that analyze things with the simple intent of making them better. This will result in the implementation of a range of transportation design and management improvements - -some of which are already being used and others are yet to be conceived. The most dramatic changes will occur with transit. The region's first light rail transit line will directly link a number of major regional activity centers. This will include downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul, the University of Minnesota, the airport (with contingency plans to extend it to a new airport), the Megamall, and a regional park or two. It will also extend into several suburbs that were selected because they had the best proposal for high- density, mixed -use development and redevelopment with indoor connections to the new transit line. Redevelopment is strongly supported along the entire line. It focuses on the need to provide fully climate - protected linkages from high- density housing through retail - service arcades to the transit stops. Although the vast majority of people still live in the suburbs and depend on the auto, the new climate -proof transit system generates new growth and redevelopment at a rapid rate. It is especially popular with aging baby boomers, and also with the newcomers to the region from places with much higher development densities (and less rigorous climates). More lines are planned based on demonstrable evidence that transit, done right, can shape development and, in doing so, increase its share of ridership. Telecommunications The Council (and probably similar bodies in every other major metro area) has come to realize that telecommunications will increasingly be as critical as transportation systems were in the past in determining a metro area's place in the hierarchy of U.S. and world metro areas. Telecommunications will also play an increasing role in shaping future urban development. The most important telecommunications advance will be the proliferation of the portable, flat - screened, multipurpose communication and computing device. By 2015 it will have begun to radically change the workplace, educational institutions and homes. This device, will serve as a computer, videophone, television, library, book, FAX, optical scanner and probably a few functions that don't yet exist. This will be possible because of the continued advances in miniaturization and the development .of a superb- quality video display. Conventional means of communications will begin to change. Voice commands will largely replace key strokes. Books, reports, letters, etc., will be composed of combinations of conventional written text, spoken words or music and video. Key -word search capabilities will give people quick and effective access to incredible amounts of information. Books will become treasured collector's items; the paperless society will be well under way. The impact on the workplace and schools are not hard to visualize, but 'there is potential for fundamental change in social interaction and interpersonal communication. Education By 2015, the routinized and regimented structures imposed on people's lives as a result of the Industrial'Revolution will have been significantly eroded. One major area of change will be in the educational system. The highly structured system of grade levels and daily class schedules will be replaced with ones more suited to the brightest and most creative creature on the planet. We should also see significant inroads of this softening of structures in the workplace, as huge numbers of independent, middle -aged baby boomers demand greater autonomy. Many people, especially those in positions of power, will resist these forces, feeling that society will collapse without the structures of the past. But future generations will come to realize that focusing on important outcomes -- knowledge, wisdom, self- support, social responsibility and joy - -do not require such rigid structuring. The distinctions between learning, work and play will become increasingly blurred. With portable flat- screen technology, education can and will take place more at home and on the job. Education and work will become more integrated, beginning at an earlier age, with more of it occurring in the home. These education, workplace and telecommunications changes will tend to separate people. Strong countermeasures will be enacted, by an overwhelming consensus, to ensure that people do not become isolated and detached from society. Quality of Life Quality of life can be defined to cover practically any aspect of human life. One current concern is the decline of married - couple families. An immediate outcome of this trend is the negative impact on the economic status of growing numbers of children. The long -term effects are also coming to be viewed with increasing alarm, as the disadvantages of being raised in poverty, with only one parent, are seen as reducing a person's chances for future economic and social success. However, as with many trends that have been going on for some time, we finally realize what's happening and start to act when the trends have peaked and either level off or reverse. We seldom anticipate these reversals coming, but only project their continuation to disastrous outcomes. I would not dare to predict that we are at such a point now or in any way want to encourage complacency. But I would not be surprised if this turns out to be the case well before 2015, and well before society unravels completely. How quality of life relates to income, and more specifically income disparities, is fairly obvious. Another, less direct relationship is between quality of life and cultural diversity. Income disparities also affect -this relationship. The conflict between those that want to be exposed to cultural diversity and those that dop't has become an issue of growing concern. The issue might be cast in terms of socioeconomic status, age or race. It is hardly a new phenomenon. In fact, it is an issue primarily because growing numbers of people reject separation. And many of those who make decisions that keep them separate (primarily through residential location) do so without being very open and direct about the motives behind their choices. There is also considerable focus today on the growing gap between the haves and the have -nots. The issues of cultural diversity and economic disparity come together because certain cultural groups in the U.S., particularly racial and ethnic minorities, have not shared equally in the wealth of our society. This will be important in the Twin Cities Area's future because the region is going to be much more culturally diverse in the future, particularly in terms of race. The minority populations in the region are much younger and have higher fertility rates. This is especially true of Southeast Asians, whose numbers are likely to continue to grow very rapidly due to natural increase (births over deaths). We should not be surprised if the region is home to 200,000 or:more Asian - Americans by 2015. Natural increase will also be high in the African- American population. More significant, however, is the potential for massive inmigration. There are currently about 90,000 African- Americans in the region. There are about one and a half 0 million in Chicago and about that same number in Milwaukee, Detroit and St. Louis combined. There has been significant inmigration in the past decade, about a 23,000 net gain. This is half the White net migration gain. This is a remarkably high proportion, considering that African - Americans make up less than five percent of the population. Most of these people have come here for social and economic opportunity. If they are able to realize these opportunities, it is likely that the connections they have in the areas . they came from, where conditions are worse, will result in increasing migration to the Twin Cities Area. We should not be surprised if the region is home to 350,000 to 400,000 African- Americans in 2015. Perhaps some of these migrants will be refugees from Third World countries, as the Twin Cities African- American community opens its arms to people in need, not unlike the region's acceptance of Southeast Asian refugees in the 1970s and 1980s. One issue this increased minority growth raises is: Will there be large enough numbers of Whites who want to live in racially mixed city neighborhoods to maintain racial balance in the central cities? The equally important flip side of this issue is how many African - Americans and Asians themselves want to live in racially mixed areas? Are they as interested in satisfying regional cultural diversity goals as in reaching economic parity? Another issue related to minority growth is the impact on regional perceptions of quality of life. The continued infusion of new people, who on the average have significantly lower incomes, will bring down the region's average, income. This could "hurt" us in national rankings, one of our favorite obsessions. But if many people who come here for opportunity find it, while the rest of the region's residents are just as well off or better off than before, how important is this overall regional average? After the "Deep Recession" by Hal Freshley The Regional Economy The Twin Cities regional economy has emerged relatively strong - -at least compared to the rest of the U.S. - -from the difficult economic restructuring that followed the Deep Recession of 1998. Elsewhere in the U.S., local economies are heavily dependent on multinational, foreign -owned companies. However, in the Twin Cities Area most employers are, in fact, local businesses. Locally owned businesses and industries have been relatively successful in finding unique "economic niches" in the global marketplace. The Twin Cities Area has emerged as a "business incubator" for a great number of new small businesses in three expanding areas of international trade: recycling technologies (plastics, chemicals, radioactive materials, hospital and industrial wastes); small machinery that meets stringent new international air and noise pollution control standards; and cold weather technologies. Of the region's historically strong businesses, food processing and biomedical technology have continued into this century. In addition, recent reports show that Twin Cities -based businesses now lead the world in developing and refining cold - climate applications, specifically for agriculture, construction engineering, energy and transportation. The primary markets for these new "cryo- technologies" are in the slowly developing United Republics (former the USSR) and in western Canada. The local economy includes all the support industries for these growth areas: postsecondary education, technical research and development firms, international marketing and advertising experts, and the new Center for International Law at the University of Minnesota. Other major growth industries include repair and 7 maintenance services (vehicles, houses, furniture, appliances and business machines), and the human equivalent of repair /maintenance (cosmetology, medicine, physical activity /recreation and long -term care). Compared to the years of the Deep Recession (1998- 2005), we now have low unemployment - -and a surge in the volume of inmigration to the region. The Twin Cities Area is drawing new residents primarily from the Great Plains states, from the older Rust Belt cities of the eastern U.S., and increasingly from California - -since the series of earthquakes in 2002 -3. Work Life If one were only looking at demographics, one might have predicted that this would be an era of retirement. By the end of this decade (2010 -2020) the number of people in the Twin Cities who reach age 60 will have increased by 150,000 persons: the "baby - boom" generation will be reaching retirement age. But a combination of events - -the Deep Recession, which wiped out many private pensions, the lack of personal savings, decrease in housing values (loss of equity) and smaller numbers of "replacement" younger people in the work force - -all have created a climate for continued employment of older persons. The region's industrial /service mix has also provided relatively higher - paying jobs than is true in the rest of the country. Coupled with the lowest unemployment rate in nearly two decades (4.1 percent now, compared to a high of 13.7 percent during the worst of the Deep Recession), Twin Citians generally have the feeling that they know what the future will bring for themselves and their children. Job discrimination is increasingly tied to genetic tests: legal suits abound over this practice. Risk of developing certain chronic diseases, as well as behavior characteristics such as "attention deficit," are now tied to specific human genes. Many middle -aged people are thankful that they have jobs at all, despite the disappointment of losing out on the retirement years that their parents had. Private pensions are increasingly tied to medical problems and disability. Able bodied, healthy people are not eligible for benefits. Consequently, more and more people continue to seek and hold on to at least part -time employment well into their 60s and 70s. Almost everyone of working age has had several jobs - -and many experienced some period of unemployment in the past. For the majority of Twin Citians (78 percent) time - limited jobs have become the norm. Few employers have so- called "permanent" employees beyond the top administration, comptrollers and legal staff. Other employees are hired on an "as needed" basis, as orders come in or contracts are won. But with a healthy economy, jobs are plentiful. The vast majority of Twin Citians feel very positive about the improving economy. However, there were some who were able to insulate themselves from the worst of the Recession. Many of the region's wealthiest persons (about eight percent of the population) had either no change or increases in their adjusted annual incomes during the Deep Recession. Some hardly knew it happened. Community Life For 30 years local communities have tried to solve their social problems through regulation, restrictions and redevelopment- - pushing "undesirable" people on to the next community. During the Deep Recession- - with high unemployment, intergroup violence and property destruction - -this approach accelerated. 0 As a result of these policies and mutual "self- sorting," the Metropolitan Area has become a hodge -podge of small urban neighborhoods, more and more homogeneous along cultural, educational and income lines. Each neighborhood has developed its own distinct "personality," which is reflected in the composition of its neighborhood- community council. In almost every neighborhood, there are ,a few very active citizens who attend most of the meetings and most vocal and influential in local decisions. In some communities the language on the street is not English but Dakotah, Spanish or Hmong. Public services are organized to include combinations of these smaller neighborhood /community units. For example, elementary schools are located in each neighborhood, but high schools serve combinations of eight to 10 neighborhoods; local police protection is provided in each neighborhood, but investigation and incarceration services are provided for 20 to 25 neighborhoods. These small communities are linked by a network of public transit vehicles (some on fixed guideways, some via highways), and each community has at least one transit - transfer hub - -for traveling on to other communities. Because the places where people live and the jobs that people have are almost completely unrelated to each other, the average amount of time each person spends commuting (including transfers) is 1.33 hours daily. The private automobile is still the preferred way of getting around; however, nearly half of the work force uses public or private transit regularly. The Supreme Court has recently ruled that individuals do not have in an inalienable right to operate cars that fail to meet air pollution standards. Alternative -fuel cars (solar and electric) are beyond the means of the majority of Twin Citians - -so transit and carpooling options have expanded. For those people who operate their own cars, transportation represents 32 percent of the family budget. In the lower- income neighborhoods, people have adapted to the economic times by developing a kind of barter economy. Money doesn't change hands as much as goods and services are traded. Child care, household carpentry and plumbing, car repair and gardening are among the skills that are in high demand among family members and neighbors. Mutual identification and mutual support have provided a great deal of social cohesion among these groups. Bypassing the medium of "money" greatly reduced sales tax revenues in these communities. Region -wide there is a debate over whether or how the state can tax these in -kind transactions. Upper- income neighborhoods are identifiable by the necessary security precautions, guards and electronic surveillance. Most of our region's wealthiest residents live in the Twin Cities Area at least part of every year, in "secure communities" (i.e., privately guarded) in the western and northeastern suburbs. One of the most controversial issues now facing federal and state lawmakers is sorting out which jurisdiction gets tax revenues from multistate and multinational enterprises. Telecommunications and commercial transport systems have made it increasingly difficult to determine where money is made and where the economic transactions actually take place. Declaring primary residence in one state or another has become quite complicated. Lower- and middle- income neighborhoods have become increasingly "stable " - -with less yearly residency turnover. The decline in the regional housing market greatly reduced housing costs -- especially in the older neighborhoods - -and increasing numbers of lower- income people have been able to buy the cheaper housing. In contrast, wealthier neighborhoods are characterized by significant seasonal 0 turnover; incentives for multiple residency, coupled with more and more business and pleasure destinations combine to increase the use of time -share condominium arrangements and lavish rental units in wealthy neighborhoods. About 63 percent of the total voting -age population voted in the last election, but the political process is dominated by the older middle -age population. Political decisions increasingly favor older people. A large share of public expenditures go to police and fire protection. Toll highways link the region's manufacturers to the national roadway system. Manufacturing and industry are largely protected by private security forces that control access to the plants and maintain order on the premises. Personal life Everywhere the influence of "age identification" is apparent. In work life, a major issue for management is seniority. Younger workers .(the majority of whom do not identify with a White- European value system) are increasingly in conflict with the increasingly staid middle -aged population (most of whom are White). Despite the weakness of the union movement in the past few years, there has been a recent resurgence of union activity, frequently with two rival unions within the same industry- - one representing the views of younger workers, and one representing older workers. The median household income (in constant 1990 dollars) fell from $36,678 in 1990 to $27,750 today. Two (or more) adult incomes are necessary for households to maintain a comfortable standard of living. As a result, there has been a big increase in "co- housing"- -where several families live in one building and share some common space- - especially among people who are nearing retirement age and very young families. Nonetheless, the life -style of the average Twin Citian bears very little resemblance to the perceived ideal of the. last century. The average work -week is 38 hours (little changed over the years), but more of everyone's time is spent on "family matters." With the maturing of the work force, the age of most workers' parents. is in the 80s and 90s. The relatively high cost of chronic care (due to the shortage of younger workers) has forced many middle -aged baby boomers to bring their older parents in to live with them. For older people who maintain separate homes, the bulk of caring and personal support is provided by family and neighbors. It is beginning to be popular among younger people to be married; but the majority of middle -aged households with children are not wife/husband parents, but single persons and multigeneration households in cohabiting and cohousing arrangements. The school year parallels the work year - -12 months long, but with two -week vacations, approximately midsummer (around July 4th is popular), and midwinter (Christmas/New Year's). The public school has become a kind of one -stop shopping for child development. In order to help working parents, the public schools offer everything from infant day care to vocational training and retraining. The curriculum for grades 1 through 12 focuses on language skills (English and at least one other language), computation and science, and physical education/health. The outcomes that are required for graduation from each grade also include age - graded standards for self - discipline and social skills (self- motivation, study habits, taking responsibility, etc.) We are still trying to figure out how to instill tolerance for "cultural pluralism" in the next generation. Secondary education provides three optional 10 concentrations: 1) vocational and business skills, 2) science and math, and 3) arts and humanities. Upper- division students in all three areas are required to have a working knowledge of English, Spanish and one other language. Crime statistics show that the major increases are occurring in white - collar crime: billing /computer fraud, electronic transfer hackers, and blackmail extortion via illegal access to private (personal) files. Since people often shop and pay bills by FAX, computer vandalism (e.g., "jamming wires ") is a threat to reliable commercial activity. There's fun here, too. Videovision (VV) is the diversion of choice, and "media junkies" have video games as well as "Leave It to Beaver" reruns at their fingertips. Spectator sports are especially popular -- people have a fascination with the struggle between the good guys vs. the bad guys. Outdoor and indoor recreation attracts middle -aged people striving to keep fit. Most middle - class households have their own version of the "total -body exerciser." These machines are programmable for any age or fitness level. Video - photography is a rapidly growing art form. Arts events reflect the new ethno- identity craze that has been sweeping the country. Hispanic fiestas, German polkafests and Swedish chorales now vie with Cambodian dancers, African- American gospel choirs and American Indian drum /singers for attention. The new wave of arts is nontraditional, a hodge -podge of cultural references -- unlike high -brow arts of old, which appealed only to a small corps of intelligentsia. Spiritual and religious affiliation is also increasing gradually, with growing interest in meditation and self - improvement sects. r Metro 2015 Vision and Goals Draft for Discussion r� Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 291 -6359 TDD 2910904 Publication No. 640- 92 -076B June 26, 1992 a4 Introduction This document is part of an effort by the Metropolitan Council to develop a "vision' or picture of what the Twin Cities Region should be in the year 2015. Why a Vision? • In its first 25 years, the Council has looked ahead to plan solutions for important problems facing the region. Now it is looking ahead to the next 25 years.. What does this region want to be, to look like and to offer its citizens in 2015? The Council is responsible for making long -range plans today to help ensure the region's health and vitality in the 21st century. Setting goals for the region is a first step. • As the Council begins to update its keystone regional plan, the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, it needs to examine the problems and opportunities the region will face over the next two decades. The policies in the framework will help guide our growth and development, but we need to know where we want to be in 2015 - -we need a vision. • The Council is specifically charged by statute to prepare goals and plans for the orderly and F economic development of the region. In addition, the Council is being challenged and encouraged to provide leadership in long -range planning for the region. Creating a vision can help in that effort. Cornerstone Ideas At the beginning of this effort, the Council set a basic assumption in establishing a vision: To achieve the highest quality living in a community setting with the flexibility to accommodate the changing population and compete in a world economy. To pursue the region's future with a sensitivity and respect for our environment in our development and redevelopment practices. The Council decided, after hearing from several nationally recognized strategic thinkers, that there are really a handful of forces or factors driving the decisions needed to make this region successful in the 21st century. Six major factors or categories emerged: • Economics • Governance • Transportation • Telecommunications • Education • Quality of life Goals as a Starting Point The goals developed in the six categories describe where we want to be, rather than ways to get there. At a later stage, it will be necessary to identify strategies to accomplish the goals and the appropriate actors to implement them. Before that, however, the Council wants to share this vision with the regional community to see if the goals are on target -- whether these are the right goals the region should be pursuing. The goals are intended to spark a wide- ranging community discussion about where this region is going in the next quarter century. Some kind of measures are needed to determine whether the region is meeting its goals. This document includes examples of possible measures for each of the six categories of goals. Like the goals, they are only a starting point for discussion. The Process The goals were drafted by small discussion groups made up of Council members, staff and members of the Council's Minority Issues Advisory Committee. The groups benefitted from ideas of national and.local experts who spoke to them, including educators, economists, academicians, planners, representatives of the telecommunications industry and others. Over the next two months, the Council will be asking for ideas and comments on these goals. Many organizations and individuals- will be participating. The Council is making a special effort to discuss the goals with some of the young people who will be adults when the year 2015 arrives. The Council will then revise the goals based on what it heard in the public dialogue. After a set of goals is adopted by the Council, the Council will move forward to develop strategies to accomplish the vision. 2 , A Vision It's now the year 2015. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area has achieved the goals proposed by the Metro Council a quarter century ago. What kind of a region do we live in? Key Themes We've become more adaptive and proactive in shaping change. We have found that in the school of change, the lesson is never over. We have developed our economy, our educational system and our governmental functions to meet changing demands and expectations. We've sought technological advances that are crucial to the region's economy and quality of life. We used technology as a tool to achieve our goals- -for example, in transportation, telecommunications, education and business. We've opened the doors wider to opportunities and resources. All residents have better access to jobs, governmental decision - making, education, recreational opportunities, health care, housing and information resources. We've gained spin -off benefits from the decisions we've made. For example, our telecommunication system has bolstered the economy while giving telecommuters an alternative to traffic congestion and enriching learning opportunities. Our education system has equipped students with basic academic, social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as citizens, workers and parents. And it has helped young people shape their hopes and potential. We have successfully resolved important but competing priorities. For example, we have grown economically, but we have preserved and improved our natural environment. We have a larger population that is more diverse, but we have strengthened our sense of community. Government has finally learned to do more with less. A Closer Look Looking more closely, we see a region that is a strong, well- established player in the global marketplace. We realized many years ago that metropolitan areas, not nations, would be the key economic competitors in the international playing field. We realized we had to be more organized in the way we bolstered the region's economy. Our young people are achieving their full potential in school; our regional quality of life has attracted talented people and dollar investments; and we've adequately invested in our essential infrastructure to support economic activity and the basic needs of our urban society.. The result has been an improved regional standard of living, supported by substantial job growth and a diverse economy. Greater Minnesota has prospered from spin -off companies and jobs located in the region: Communities in the region have willingly cooperated in seeking business, jobs and revenues based on regional interests rather than the interests of individual communities. This cooperation enables the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets. 3 We've made the region a leader in the use of technological advances in transportation and telecommunications, which support both our economy.and quality of life. Our telecommunications system uses leading -edge technology to link our voices, video images and data with destinations within the region, and around the state, nation and the globe. Telecommunications is now considered as essential an infrastructure as transportation, sewers and education. The region leads in using technological advances in transportation like "intelligent" vehicle and highway systems. At the same time, we've made better use of the facilities we have by managing travel demand and charging users a variety of transportation "prices," like congestion fees and parking surcharges. Our transit system, now very consumer- oriented, has more passengers each year. Our major.airport is an international hub, with direct flights to cities around the country and the world. Government at all levels has become more innovative and cost- efficient in delivering services and solving problems. Government roles are clearly defined so that services are delivered at the most effective and efficient level. People have responded with renewed interest in governmental affairs and higher voting rates show it. People feel a stronger sense of belonging to their communities within the region, and they participate and feel comfortable in their community. At the same time, people feel that they belong to one metropolitan region.. They think about and work for z the Metro Area. We still have a strong environmental awareness. But we think less now about mitigating negative effects on the environment, and more about designing urban development and its support facilities with nature and people in mind. Our air and water are cleaner; our waste is less toxic and we're producing less of it per capita. We can swim and fish in our three major rivers and in our lakes that have the greatest potential for recreation or water supply. The region has an abundance of accessible recreation, cultural and information opportunities. Health care is accessible to everyone who needs it, but most people take responsibility for pursuing a healthful lifestyle. Families of all types get the support they need to care for their family members, including children and elderly. The percentage of all residents living in poverty has declined Housing is affordable for more of the region's residents, and it is designed to suit people at various stages of their lives and people with special needs. More employment opportunities are located near affordable housing and more affordable housing near new jobs. Our aging neighborhoods have been rehabilitated and a sense of community strengthened there. Our streets are safer and crime rates lower. We've planned the region's growth into a pattern that has reduced traffic congestion, the cost of public services, energy consumption, air pollution, and more of the negative effects on the environment. Urban design concepts have helped create a sense of place, with open spaces, natural features, public buildings and transportation facilities. We have come a long way in 25 years. We're already looking ahead to the next quarter century. 4 Goals The Regional Economy For many years the region has been a good place to live, work and establish businesses. Its economy has experienced steady employment growth of 2.7 percent annually and relatively low unemployment rates (4.5 percent in 1991) - -well below Minnesota and U.S. rates of 5.1 percent and 6.7 percent, respectively. Manufacturing industries gained some jobs, while service industries gained the most. The region is home to 15 firms on the Fortune 500 list of industrial firms. Its poverty rate (8.1 percent) is well below the national average (13.1 percent). In per capita personal income; the region ranked sixth among the 25 largest metro areas in 1989 (8 percent higher than the average of the 25 metro areas and 15 percent higher than the U.S. average). This success has largely been credited to the region's skilled labor force and to our diverse economy. But in recent years a number of clouds have appeared on the economic horizon. There are questions about how well we are educating our labor force; the computer industry in the region is in decline; some major businesses are no longer under family or local control; the Minnesota business climate has been soundly criticized by the private sector; global competition is increasing and world markets are changing. In addition, there are concerns about the problem of low income burdening a significant number of people, inadequate productivity growth, our ability , to maintain competitive advantages in computers and medical equipment, and the demand for government services versus the willingness to pay for those services. Looking to the year 2015 raises a major question: Is the region prepared to compete and thrive in this changing environment? For example, no longer is the region's business competition the other cities in the U.S.; it is other cities around the world. Can we afford to sit back and let "the market" respond to these and other changes, or are there some roles government can or should play to keep this region competitive in the emerging world markets? What roles should the business community play? Are there opportunities for public /private cooperation? Before these questions can be answered, it is important to have a vision of what we want the regional economy to look like. Below are goals that can help shape that vision for the 2015 economy. Goals 1. The region is recognized as a major player in the global economy, based on the following: The region has a highly educated workforce with skills important to the. regional economy, and with the ability to learn new skills as the economy changes in response to the national and international economies. These would include a wide range of skills- -for example, in design and manufacturing as well as in management and finance. The region has a quality of life that attracts and keeps both businesses and a highly skilled and adaptable workforce. Infrastructure developed by regional and local governments and by the private sector supports regional economic activity and encourages job growth that meets the needs of the population. Infrastructure financing - -using cooperative arrangements, where possible -- reflects the full costs of facilities through their life cycle -- including costs of capital, operation, maintenance and replacement. 5 2. The region's economy experiences steady growth in the gross regional product per capita (increasing the regional standard of living), based on the following: Job growth provides employment at liveable wages for all residents, raising low and middle per capita income levels. The region's economy is diverse and flexible in terms of using regional strengths and resources (labor market, investment capital, infrastructure, natural resources, etc.) to adapt to changing regional and world markets and to attract and retain industries serving those markets. 3. Communities in the region are more willing to cooperate in seeking business, jobs and revenues based on regional interests rather than on the interests of individual communities. Such cooperation -- assisted by a more equitable tax structure, a more equitable provision of needed services and more appropriate use of public investments in private undertakings- -helps enable the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets. 4. The region has more corporate headquarters of large public and private firms. Banks, insurance companies, venture capital companies and other sources of investment capital in the region provide adequate funds to invest in start -up and expansion of local firms and to nurture entrepreneurial efforts. 5. The tax burden of the region's residents and businesses ranks lower than in 1992 as compared to other metropolitan areas. Examples of Possible Measures Unemployment rate compared to other urban areas Per capita personal income in region compared to other urban areas (per capita gross regional product compared to other urban areas) Percent of population below the poverty level compared to other urban areas (percent of population above 150 percent of poverty rate) Employment growth rate compared with previous years and comparable regions (employment growth rate in specific industries) Mix of industries in region compared to mix in the nation (diversity) Composite measures of tax burden on individuals (rankings) and on businesses (rankings) 6 Governance Government in the early 1990s has fallen on hard times. Regional and local government has experienced declining federal support; political leadership has been criticized or challenged; and many citizens feel a strong disaffection from government, becoming active mainly when their self - interest is threatened. The challenge to government is to bring new people into the process both as participants and in leadership positions, particularly minorities and women whose participation in the past had been limited; to develop a renewed sense of confidence in government's ability to solve problems by allowing decision - making at the neighborhood or community levels where innovation and flexibility can be encouraged; to act decisively and in the broader regional interest at the regional level for those problems that need a central focus. A renewed emphasis on governance -- acting collectively to solve problems - -is essential. People and governmental units need to think of themselves as being part of one region. The region cannot be a collection of cities all competing against one another. The region now competes with the world. In governance, there is often a need to balance competing priorities- -for example, the desire for-, government to be "close to the people," on one hand, and, on the other, expectations for government services to be efficient and economical, often requiring centralization. The Metro Council also has a vision for its own role in governance. It includes strong leadership on regional issues, bolstered by additional authority to decide how state funds are spent in the Metropolitan Area for public infrastructure and to determine where and when public subsidies will be used for facilities of region -wide importance. Goals 1. All segments of the public have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their lives and the future of their communities. Citizen decision - making takes place at the neighborhood and community level, whenever possible. Citizen decision - making is also fostered in our larger governmental units. 2. People have confidence in their elected and appointed government officials. The region has a high level of political participation (such as voting and the number of persons running for office). Participants and leaders are more representative of the diversity of the region. 3. Government roles and responsibilities are appropriately and clearly defined, including roles involving education, so that regional and local policymaking and service delivery occur at the most effective and efficient level, and gaps in services are closed. 4. Governmental units achieve the results people want by redesigning the service delivery system and using other innovative approaches, public or private, to deliver public services. 5. The Metropolitan Council is the region's leader for policy planning, which provides direction, integration and coordination of regional services. The Council decides how federal and state funds allocated to the Metropolitan Area for public infrastructure will be spent. It decides on major direct and indirect public investments that support facilities of region -wide importance located within the Metropolitan Area. 7 Examples of Possible Measures Opinion poll measures on people's confidence in local government Voter participation rates Number of service redesign projects completed Level of Metro Council participation in public decisions regarding facilities of region -wide importance sited in the region �4 J Transportation The transportation problems the region faces today and in the future stem from our need and desire for personal mobility. Our life style involves pursuing many activities in many locations. And to meet those needs, the automobile -- specifically the automobile with a sole occupant- -has been the mode of choice for the vast majority of people. However, using our cars as vehicles to carry just one person has been a major factor in causing our transportation problems. For example, it is primarily responsible for the growing problem of congestion during peak travel periods. Between 1972 and 1984, the number of severely congested - -freeway - miles -rose from 24 -to 72- miles. — That- total could increase to-200 miles -by the year 2010, according to estimates of the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. With many cars having only a solo driver, our extensive highway system has not been used efficiently. For example, during peak periods, average auto occupancy dropped nine percent between 1980 and 1990. At the same time, people have been traveling more. On an average weekday, the number of trips taken per person rose by a third between 1970 and 1990. Heavy use of the single - occupant auto is also a major factor in causing the negative environmental effects caused by the building and operation of our transportation system. It is an expensive wayi to move people. And it has promoted a spread -out land use pattern that makes it difficult to serve many parts of our region with economical transit service. Ridesharing and transit use, on the other hand, can increase the efficiency of the transportation system. But bus ridership declined 24 percent from 1980 to 1990. The challenge facing the region is to make these modes more attractive while making use of single - occupant vehicles less attractive and convenient. Airport capacity is another major issue. The region risks forgoing substantial economic gains if adequate airport capacity is not available as needed in a timely fashion over the next 25 years. Goals 1. The transportation system moves people and goods within the region and to the state, nation and world efficiently and cost - effectively. The transportation system is developed in ways that preserve the integrity of the environment, allow for economic growth and development, and support other regional goals. The system also reflects the region's leadership in the use of advanced transportation technology (for example, "intelligent" vehicle and highway systems, high -speed rail, hover craft) that maximizes the system's capacity and efficiency. 2. The regional transportation system balances demand and capacity so that resources are used most efficiently and the environment is least affected. This is achieved by managing how existing facilities are used- -for example by reducing use of single- occupant vehicles, changing the tinge that people make trips, reducing the frequency of trips and changing trip destinations. The system also balances local, state and national mobility needs. 3. Transit is the preferred choice over the single - occupant automobile for many more people. An adequately funded and improved transit system makes regular -route transit, paratransit and ridesharing more attractive for all users. With improved safety, comfort and convenience of riders and drivers, the transit system increases the people- carrying capacity of the transportation system as much as possible, serves the needs of transit - dependent people, supplements the metropolitan highway system, maintains and enhances the economic vitality of the central cities and allows for intensified development in other economic centers. Land development and redevelopment create an, environment that promotes and encourages increased use of all forms of transit. 4. The efficiency of the transportation system is improved, and use of the system reflects the environmental, social and financial costs to society. For example, the region is a national leader in using a variety of transportation pricing, including . "congestion pricing," "peak - period pricing," parking surcharges and single- occupant vehicle taxes. 5. The region has an air transportation system with the capability to meet the demand from .businesses and people in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest for air connections to the nation and the world. The region's major airport enjoys the presence of "home base" commercial airline facilities, international hubbing and a competitive airline market, with a the sizable presence of several national commercial airlines. Direct passenger and air freight services are available to the world's major cities. The region's major airport, and its satellite airports, provide convenient and safe air travel, and cause the least amount of disruption to the environment. Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time) Miles of congested freeways Vehicle occupancy Transit ridership Air quality measures Application of "intelligent" vehicle technology in transit service Airline takeoffs and landings Number of international airline flights from Twin Cities Area Number of nonstop airline flights 10 Telecommunications Telecommunications - -and access to it - -will become increasingly vital to the fundamental economic health of the Twin Cities Region in the years ahead. That's a lesson history can teach us. This region grew to national economic prominence because the railroads, then the highways, then today's jet airplanes gave the region's businesses good connections to the national market. These facilities gave the region a way to overcome its remote inland location to sell and ship its ideas and products to the nation, and more recently, to the world. Now, telecommunications is increasingly being viewed as the next key infrastructure, as important to the region as the railroads and highways were in the region's economic history. The region's businesses need the same access --or better - -to advanced telecommunications as businesses in other regions enjoy in order to compete in a world marketplace. In addition, the region needs modern, high - capacity telecommunications services because people need access to information and because telecommunications offers seemingly boundless opportunities for people to learn, earn a living and enjoy a higher quality of life. Unequal opportunities, experts argue, will lead to a society of "information rich" and "information poor." Telecommunications could help solve other problems. It could aid in solving central city problems, where, for example, the presence of advanced telecommunications facilities could help offset the ` disadvantage of high redevelopment costs. Telecommuting could also reduce peak - period travel or travel in congested corridors. However, private providers of advanced telecommunications capabilities have not upgraded their equipment here as rapidly as they have in other regions. High - capacity fiber optic transmission lines are not available throughout the region. If the transmission of voice, data and video experiences a boom as some predict, the existing infrastructure may not be adequate to do the job. By and large, governmental units in the region have their own networks to move data or communicate with their police and fire departments. Telecommunications - -and facility- sharing -- may give them a way to provide more effective services more efficiently. But there is no coordinated approach, or public sector planning, in telecommunications. Each unit of government has made its own arrangements with telecommunications vendors to get its needs met. Goals 1. The region has "leading -edge" telecommunications services readily available to all businesses and homes. High - capacity telecommunication transmission facilities and networks move information within the region and state, and to national and worldwide destinations. The region's telecommunications infrastructure gives businesses a competitive advantage in producing and selling products and services to the nation and the world. 11 2. Telecommunications infrastructure is considered as fundamental to the effective functioning of the region as are roads and sewers. The region uses telecommunications technology to its fullest extent to provide cost- efficient access to information and services for all its residents. The region uses telecommunications as a tool to implement regional policies. Government agencies throughout the region use telecommunications technology to improve the quality, effectiveness and coordination of their services. . Examples of Possible Measures (comparison with previous years) Miles of fiber optic cable in place Region's telecommunications ranking nationally and internationally Public- access points to data and information Use of telecommunications in development and redevelopment activities Percent of population that is "computer literate" Percent of population with access to a personal computer 12 Education Observers of the K- through -12 education system- -from education, business and government - -have said that our schools are a little better than the rest of the nation's - -but not good enough for our future. They offer some criticisms: • Schools aren't focused on helping students learn; they are organized and run for adults, not students. • Expectations are low and there are not many incentives for students or teachers to do well. • Athletic achievement and "having things" are valued, but academic achievement is not. • The region's high school graduation rate is high (at 91 percent), it may be because the standards are low. For example, Minnesota is one of only eight states that require less than 175 instructional days per year; 90 percent of Minnesota high school students are allowed to spend as little as five hours in class; and only 13 percent attend districts that have established formal homework policies. • The education system has a dismal record of meeting the educational needs of our growing racial and ethnic minority populations. For example, 30 percent of the 6,000 -plus students iner the seven -county region who dropped out of school in 1991 were from racial or ethnic minority groups. By contrast, minorities make up only 16 percent of the total student population in the region. • School boards have been criticized for focusing on financial and administrative matters at the expense of students. School boards have also been called monopoly systems with exclusive franchises that are reluctant to allow others to create schools. In addition, businesses find an increasing number of high school graduates ill- equipped to perform work that requires even basic language and math skills. But, at most, one -third of Minnesota's high school districts have established minimum standards for graduates' reading and mathematics skills. Approximately 555,000 Minnesotans between the ages of 18 and 64 are unable to read, write, compute, problem -solve or cope with changing conditions sufficiently well to meet the requirements of adult life in our society. If this region is to compete with the world, high school students must be better trained On average, Minnesota spends more for education than most states (17 percent more per capita), and has increased its financial commitment steadily over the past 20 years. In 1992 -93 Minnesota will spend 30 percent of its $15.4 billion budget on elementary and secondary school education. But recognized measures show that performance has in fact declined. While Minnesota still ranks high in American College Test scores, the results have been dropping more than the national average. Scholastic Aptitude Test and Advance Placement scores have continued to steadily decline. The Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores have actually dipped below the national average. The question arises: What kind of education are our young people getting for the money we spend? 13 Goals 1. Education is valued and supported. The regional community places a high value on educating its children and youth. It is a top priority to provide financial and other resources so that students can develop the capabilities they need to reach their full potential. 2. Education is focused on students, and helping them learn is the highest priority of education. Students are interested in learning and know how to learn- -they can use information, solve problems and work in teams. Being "educated" means being equipped with the academic, social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as a citizen, worker and parent in a rapidly changing society. The community sets high expectations for students. It stresses students' efforts and honors their academic achievements. Students understand the community's expectations and know they have to demonstrate mastery of specific skills in order to graduate. 3. The community encourages innovation and excellence in teaching that improves the way students learn. It supports and rewards these efforts. Schools and teachers are rewarded based primarily on results. The teaching profession is sought after by people who have a passion for teaching and learning. People with diverse backgrounds obtain certification using their education, practical and professional experiences. The profession attracts and retains the best educators. 4. The governance of public education is broadly based, involving parents, students, educators and many others in the community. 5. A restructured school system that provides learning opportunities from early childhood on has replaced the conventional K -12 public school structure of the 20th century. Parents and students choose among a broad range of school organizations, settings and schedules. Students progress based on demonstrated competency of the material. Often, they are grouped across ages to learn from each other. Much of their learning takes place in the community at business, government and other sites. Learning is enhanced by extensive use of technology. 6. The entire community- -in a cooperative, coordinated effort--joins teachers in working to nurture, support and applaud students in their educational efforts. It provides a safe, healthy environment that promotes learning. Parents are actively involved in their children's education and create a home environment that encourages learning. Schools are "community centers" where citizens interact with students to help them learn. Businesses, civic organizations, social- service agencies, and secular and religious organizations provide learning opportunities and recognize academic achievement. 7. Cultural differences are celebrated and shared. Students learn about and respect the practices, beliefs and historical contributions of different cultures. In order to share more fully in the global society, students can speak languages of the world in addition to English. 14 8. Higher education in the region is available to all students based on ability to learn and choice, rather than on ability to pay. The region's higher education institutions foster research and development as part of their mission to educate students and generate discoveries of new knowledge. 9. People assume that they will continue to learn throughout their lives. The community provides_ affordable educational opportunities that are flexible enough to meet the people's needs for job training, citizenship and other learning in a rapidly changing world. 10. The region'i educational system produces a highly - skilled and motivated work force that fuels our businesses' efforts to grow and compete in the global economy. Examples of Possible Measures School readiness - -an indicator that the student has the health, nutrition, developmental skills and family support necessary for success in school, compared over time Average state score on school achievement tests as a ratio to the national average, or, as an alternative, the proposed competency -based graduation requirement of the Minnesota State Board of Education (1992) Schools with drop -out rates over 10 percent ( "drop - out" is defined as a student absent from school for a 12 month period, a definition used nationally) Percentage of high - school graduates who are pursuing advanced education or training one year after high - school, compared over time Percentage of recent high - school graduates rated average or better in work skills by their employers, compared over time 15 Quality of Life Quality of life is made up of all the things we expect, that we value, and are committed to maintain through payments of time, energy or money. Quality of life is all the reasons people like to live in the Twin Cities Area -- personal well- being, living conditions, opportunities to be part of a community, work life, physical surroundings and leisure time activities. Quality of life is all the things that we would miss if they were gone, the things that make this region special and 'better" than many other areas. Many people believe that the region has a high quality of life, that there are many unique and good things here. All citizens do not necessarily share those feelings, especially those who believe that they do not have equal access to opportunities in the community. There is danger in assuming that everyone participates in a high quality of life. And we risk complacency if we do not recognize and preserve the quality of life that we have, even as we seek ways to improve it. We need to be aware that focusing on the long -term quality of life may also mean forgoing some short-term gains, or even sacrifices, for some long -term efforts. The dimensions of our quality of life are diverse and growing more so, and will change over time. We need to be flexible to respond to changes desired by future generations. E' A. INDIVIDUAL WELL - BEING, THE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY A decent, affordable place to live and the safety and security of person and property are basic needs that must be met before many other quality-of -life aspects can be considered. As important as they are, however, our region has a ways to go toward meeting those needs. The crime rate, for example, has continued to go up. Between 1980 and 1989, incidents of reported violent crime went up 42 percent in Minneapolis and 22 percent in St. Paul. The lack of affordable housing continues to plague the region despite decades of efforts to deal with the problem. In 1990, for example, 40 percent of all renter households in the region (113,000 people) paid more than 30 percent of their income for rent, a standard measure of housing affordability. And nearly one- fourth of renter households had annual incomes below $10,000. Another essential ingredient of individual well -being is access to a basic level of goods and services, especially health care. Access to health care, however, remains a problem. In 1988, six percent of the population was not covered by health insurance for all or part of the year. Moreover, the infant mortality rate - -often linked to a lack of prenatal care - -has increased for people of ethnic and racial minorities. In 1985, for example, the infant mortality rate for African Americans was 16.38 per 1,000 live births; in 1988 it jumped to 20.46. For Asian Americans, the rate rose from 5.65 in 1985 to 8.54 in 1988. Parents should be able to expect that they can raise their children in the best possible environment and that they and their family will not be trapped in poverty or hindered by discrimination. But in 1990, 11 percent of all children in the region lived in poverty; and 36 percent of families headed by women had incomes below the poverty level, an increase from 30 percent in 1980. For people of racial and ethnic minorities, the percent living in poverty was much higher. 37 percent of African Americans, 41 percent of American Indians, 32 percent of Asian Americans, 19 percent of persons of Hispanic origin and 24 percent of other races. We must provide opportunities to people for education and work that enable them to earn a living and provide for their basic needs. 16 As these and other issues are addressed, the region needs to foster a sense in its people that they have a personal stake in their local communities and in other communities in the region. The weaknesses of some communities can affect the future of others. People who have the means should be willing to give of their time and money to make the region a better place to live- - viable, progressive and constantly striving for improvement. This spirit of contributing and caring has been strong here and is an essential ingredient for building a better area in the future. Goals 1. The region has a comprehensive, cost- effective system to deliver high - quality health care and related services with choices in treatment alternatives for physical and mental illnesses. All the region's residents have access to health care services. The region has a highly rated emergency response system. The region's health care system emphasizes preventing health problems and promoting health and wellness. The region has improved the health status of its residents based on a wide range of indicators- -for example, reduced deaths and injuries otchildren. from family abuse and neglect, a reduced death rate from cardiovascular disease, increased levels of physical activity of the population, and increased immunization for infections diseases. 2. All residents of the region feel safe and secure in their homes, neighborhoods streets, sidewalks, schools and parks. They have confidence that public safety personnel will respond. quickly and appropriately, regardless of where they live or their minority or economic status. The region's ranking compared to the rates of violent and property crimes in other metropolitan areas, both in the central cities and suburbs, are lower than the region's rank in population size. Sales and use of illegal drugs have substantially decreased. 3. All types of family structures are supported so parents can carry out their responsibilities and their children can develop into adults who take 'responsibility for themselves and their community. Elderly and disabled people have every opportunity to live independently as much and as long as possible. Extended families have more support to care for their members and do not need to rely on institutions. 4. The basic needs of all of the area's population for shelter, food, water, clothing and energy are met. The percentage of the region's population living in poverty has decreased. Everyone has equal opportunities for education, employment, housing, leisure or social activities regardless of their race, color, creed, religion, national- origin, gender, disability, age, status with regard to public assistance or sexual orientation. Cultural values and religious beliefs are recognized and celebrated. 5. Residents of the region have a sense of pride in and belonging to their community, and a concern for its long -range future. The region continues to be an example to other metropolitan areas for its recognition of and participation in volunteerism, corporate leadership and contributions to nonprofit charitable and cultural organizations. 17 6. Housing is affordable and available for all income groups throughout the urban area of the region. An increased percentage of households in the region own their homes. Appropriate housing is available for persons at all stages of their lives as well as for persons with special housing needs -- people with disabilities, children, elderly and others. Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time) Percent of population, especially children, living below the poverty line Number of reported cases of child abuse or neglect Number of teen pregnancies Infant mortality rate Drug and alcohol- related death rate Number of homeless people Percent of households below the median income spending more than 30 percent of income on housing Ranking of region among other metro areas in health care Rates of violent crime and domestic violence DWI arrest and conviction rates Rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS _ Percent of pretax revenue contributed by major businesses to social programs, the arts and other F activities B. EMPLOYMENT The region's quality of life depends upon its economic base. Its future success is dependent upon increasing the pool of highly skilled jobs filled by highly skilled labor, both professional and technical. An individual's quality of life also depends on the economic base, and the ability to qualify for, find and hold a job that can support a family. Trends in the 1980s raise serious questions about whether it is possible to greatly expand the number of "sustainable" jobs. For example, the biggest increase in employment during the decade was in the service and retail sectors (65 percent of new jobs), which pay, the lowest average weekly wages. Employment is expected to continue moving away from the central cities and into the suburbs over the next 25 years. The Metro. Council forecasts that the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul will see little or no growth in employment between 1990 and 2020. On the other hand, suburban job growth continues. For example, between 1980 and 1989, 67 percent of all net new jobs were created in the region's developing suburbs. And suburban job growth will increase substantially in the future, particularly in the southern and southwestern suburbs. The increases, if they occur, will mean that people will be travelling to the job -rich suburbs in far greater numbers for service and retail work. But their incomes may not permit them to live in the higher -priced suburban housing near available jobs. Goals 1. An increased proportion of jobs pay a wage that can support a family. Employment opportunities, rates and wages of Metropolitan Area women and minorities are equal to those of white males. 18 2. Employment opportunities are maintained and increased in areas with existing, affordable housing. More affordable housing opportunities are available in areas with growing employment. Residents have a wide range of employment opportunities within a 30- minute commute by public transit within the urban area. 3. Everyone has opportunities for retraining and reemployment. Each student graduating from high school, technical or vocational colleges has the knowledge and skills necessary to obtain an entry level job, and over the long run, to compete and survive in the employment market. 4. Large businesses in the region have on -site child care available. Smaller employers have cooperative child care arrangements. Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time) Per capita income for women and racial and ethnic minorities Ratio of workers in manufacturing to service and retail sectors Number of persons unemployed more than 26 weeks Percent real growth in average wages per worker Ratio of the region's average wages per worker to the national average Number of businesses with child care available to employees C. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT The physical environment encompasses both the natural resources of the area -- water, air, soils, minerals, vegetation and animal life - -and the developed landscape that consists of the facilities and services required by a large urban population. If the Metropolitan Area of 2015 is to be a better place to live in than it is today, there will have to be a closer relationship between the natural and the human -built environment. Past abuses of the natural environment will need to be corrected, and urban development will be fully integrated into the environment. New development will put greater emphasis on good urban design and functional efficiency. The end result will be a metropolitan area that is an attractive, well - functioning and exciting place to live for all of its residents. The region faces major challenges in pursuing these goals: • We need to continue improving water quality through better wastewater treatment as our population increases, effluent standards become more strict, and costs go up. • The amount of pollution from "nonpoint" sources (for example, from farms and paved parking lots) must substantially decrease. It will require changes in the personal, household and business practices of people in the region, as well as those upstream of the region. • We need to maintain the region's competitive advantage in water resources by managing them wisely. • We need to reduce the amount of waste we generate and find productive reuses for it rather than burying it in landfills. • We need to make better choices in the way we develop our land, to minimize the impacts on the environment and consider the full range of physical, economic and social consequences. 19 • The region needs to develop in a manner that allows ins to economically and efficiently provide the full range of urban facilities and services. • We need to retain the historic, central role of the downtowns of Minneapolis and St. Paul, even as the region continues to developed outward. • We need to increase the concentration of development in the major suburban business centers so they can become additional hubs of activity. • We need to arrest the physical deterioration of houses and businesses, and bring deteriorated areas into productive use. • We need to develop and retain a sense of place and a local sense of distinctiveness within the urbanized area. Goals 1. All large tracts of land with high - quality or unique natural resource and scenic values will be available for public use. All public waters have public access. All natural watercourses, including wetlands, channels, floodplains and shorelands are sufficiently protected to allow them to function naturally. The region continues to be "water rich," and with careful management of this valuable resource, meets the multiple demands on groundwater and surface water. The region's soil and mineral resources are carefully managed. 2. There is swimmable and fishable water quality in the region's three major rivers and some 100 lakes with major potential for recreation or for domestic water supply. Levels of nonpoint- source pollution generated locally are as low as possible under existing technology and within economic constraints. Levels of such pollution generated outside the region are substantially below those of 1992. Regional sanitary sewer service is of high quality, affordable, and available when and where needed within the urban service area. All residual materials from wastewater treatment plants are put to beneficial uses. The region has reduced the per capita amounts and toxicity of waste generated compared with 1992 conditions. Reuse and recycling are at the highest level that is technologically achievable and economically feasible. There is little landfilling of wastes. There are no more major pollution sites to be cleaned up, and all previously contaminated sites have been put back into beneficial uses. The region attains or exceeds all federal and state ambient air quality standards. 3. The physical development pattern of the region is directed toward reducing traffic congestion, energy consumption, air pollution and negative effects on the natural environment. All decisions about physical development consider all the direct and indirect impacts of development or siting of facilities, such as noise, visual impacts, land use conflicts, traffic and congestion, environmental disruption and consequences for the social fabric of neighborhoods. At the same time, essential facilities for the region are accommodated 4. The region has an urban service area with a compact, contiguous development pattern and densities high enough to make delivering services efficient, yet balanced with open space and the natural environment. In the rural area, productive farm lands and open spaces are preserved and development limited to be consistent with a rural level of public services. 20 The two downtowns continue to be viable commercial centers, with increased emphasis on large - scale, unique facilities and events. Major retail and office concentrations, such as those around regional shopping centers, are secondary focal points and hubs of activity. These areas are more densely developed than in 1992, offer a wider variety of goods and services, contain a mix of commercial and residential uses, and are highly accessible via the transportation system. Community and neighborhood centers continue to provide essential goods and services for nearby residents. The freestanding growth centers are maintained as distinct and separate concentrations of development. 5. Aging areas have been rehabilitated so they can continue to be viable neighborhoods. Priority is given to maintaining the existing housing stock and making it useful for the future, instead of demolishing and replacing it. Supporting infrastructure has been updated or renewed as needed. Maintenance and rehabilitation have focused equally on residential as well as commercial and industrial components so these areas can continue to provide both housing and jobs. 6. Regional and local governments make substantial use of a variety of urban design concepts in developing and redeveloping the urban area. Open spaces and natural features, as well as the 'built" features like transportation facilities and public buildings are used to enhance the F environment. A "sense of place" has been created within the urban fabric through the use of aesthetics and good design. Historic areas and structures are preserved when new development and redevelopment occurs. All urban design recognizes that the region is a "winter city" that functions and is attractive in all four seasons. A healthy "urban forest" is being maintained and expanded. Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time) Land area in natural resource - related public ownership at all levels Water quality reports of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Number of violations of pollution discharge permits River miles that do not meet standards of being "fishable and swimmable" Amount of wetland acres filled Quantity of water used Percentage of water supply systems meeting state drinking water standards Quantity of solid waste not recycled Quantity of hazardous wastes generated Toxic chemicals release or transferred (millions of pounds per year) Number of days per year that air quality standards are violated Tons of soil lost (per acre of cropland) Number of "Super Fund" sites identified and the number cleaned up Number of petroleum release sites and the number cleaned up Amount of prime agricultural land lost to development Acres of land enrolled in Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program Acres of land added to the metropolitan urban service area, defined by the Metropolitan Council Number of jobs by location, downtowns and suburban activity concentrations Retail sales and sales tax data Annual issuance of building permits Demolition permits 21 Trip generation/traffic data for highways and transit useri Transit ridership and level of transit service Average annual energy use (average BTUs per person) Percentage of urban tree cover D. LEISURE AND ENTERTAINMENT The leisure and entertainment opportunities available in the region are good indicators of our high quality of life. Though not necessities- -like shelter, a job, security or transportation, for example -- leisure and entertainment opportunities are nonetheless important. They challenge us, stimulate us, excite us and enrich our lives. Our participatory and spectator sports, outdoor activities, cultural institutions and community events increase the pleasure of living in the region. They help attract businesses and skilled workers to our area. Some of the major challenges in achieving these goals: • We need to maintain the high level of cultural and recreational opportunities available in the region today, in light of competing demands for public and private resources. • We currently do not have the financial resources to implement the regional parks system currently envisioned. The current estimate is that $300 million will be needed to complete the development and redevelopment of the system. • As communities develop, they will be challenged to keep up with the changing recreational needs of their population, and to establish local park systems early in their development. • Concerns, about access to activities and information will continue to grow as technology increases and if dispersed growth patterns continue. Goals 1. The region offers a rich range of cultural opportunities in music, art and theater. Citizens have more opportunities to take part as active participants as well as to view, watch and listen. 2. Everyone has access to key information sources, including the information and entertainment media, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television or any new media that may develop. Libraries are more accessible and use the latest technology. All private, public, governmental agency, school and university libraries are linked electronically. 3. A park system composed of local, regional and state parks provides a wide range of activities. The regional park system envisioned in 1992 is now completed. Local parks are located within walking distance of urban residents' homes. A trail system for walking, hiking and biking is in place throughout the region, within walking distance from urban residents' homes. Park facilities respond to users needs: they provide recreational opportunities for all residents irrespective of age, income or mobility status. The region has sufficient athletic fields, golf courses, hockey rinks or other recreational facilities (indoor and outdoor) to meet the standards of the National Recreation and Park Association. Facilities provide for year -round activities. The number of available activities and facilities is increasing at 1e6st as fast as the population growth rate. The region is home to major professional sports, and there are sufficient facilities to accommodate the teams and the fans. Fla Opportunities are available for game fishing in lakes and rivers within the region. Habitat is maintained so that there is access to hunting opportunities within a day's trip from the region. 4. All major leisure and entertainment facilities in the urban area are accessible by public transit. Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time) Attendance at arts performances Number of amateur sports participants Number of participants attending professional sporting events Percent of homes with telephone service Percent of homes with access to cable television Miles of public recreational trails Library circulation data Acres of remaining regional parks to be acquired Number of public access facilities on lakes and rivers Park user counts Attainment of National Recreation and Park Association standards ss• 23 ; �. � 'T /.1 o e lose SDv REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: MARCELLA DAEHN , CLERK Date: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 Subject: ELECTION JUDGES FOR GENERAL /CITY ELECTION Agenda Item # ° -I Consent [E Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action Motion n Resolution E] Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the election judges on the attached list be appointed for the General /City Election on November 3, 1992; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary. Info /Background: Pursuant to Minnesota Election Law 204B.21, election judges shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality. (over) Proposed General Election Judges November 3, 1992 Precinct 1A - Shepherd of Hills Church 1. Genie Williams, Chair 2. Lois Hallquist 3. Dorothy Capetz 4. Virginia Vonhof 5. Arlene Friday 6. Shirley DeLeo 7. Janet Remington 8. Shirley Graziano 9. Virginia Anthony 10. Cathee Hare Precinct 1B - Chapel Hills Church 1. Ardis Dorsey, Chair 2. Jean Liudahl, Co -Chair 3. Sue Corson 4. Catherine Murphy 5. Marianne Schoenecker 6. Donna White 7. Nancy Hopf 8. Jean Altman 9. Diane Safley 10. Brenda Brink Precinct 2 - Edina City Hall 1. Marjorie Ruedy, Chair 2. Joan Flumerfelt 3. Sue Hirsch 4. Carol Bucklin 5. Lorraine Purdy 6. Naomi Johnson 7. Kay Tierney 8. Mary Ann Haemig 9. Florence Tretten 10. Elizabeth Anfinson Precinct 3 - Edina Covenant Church 1. Patricia Dill, Chair 2. Deidre Hedrick 3. Margaret Hagerty 4. Patricia Schwartz 5. Mara Ingwalson 6. Mary Webber 7. Barbara Bergan 8. Cindy Farmer 9. Sherrill Estenson 10. Kathleen Stiehm A, - '. 500 S. Blake Rd. 50th St. 6425 Mendelssohn La. (55343) 938 -5086 305 Grove Place (55343) 938 -5886 6304 Waterman Ave. (55343) 935 -5724 414 Harrison Ave. S. (55343) 935 -1126 6525 Belmore Lane (55343) 933 -4464 609 Wataerman Ave. (343) 938 -3859 6424 Belmont.La. (343) 938 -0319 613 Waterman Cir. (343) 935 -5724 301 Griffit St. (343) 935 -3768 5306 Malibu Dr. (36) 933 -1824 6512 Vernon Ave. 50th St. 6624 Parkwood Rd. (36) 933 -2649 6075 Lincoln Dr. (36) 938 -4986 5408 Stauder Cir. (36) 938 -3456 6143 Arctic Way (36) 938 -4287 4218 Scott Ter. (16) 927 -8039 6016 Tracy Ave. (16) 929 -4296 6445.Vernon Ave. (36) 935 -6244 6151 Arctic Way (36). 935 -4801 6715 Parkwood La. (36) 938 -6' 6670 Vernon Ave. (36) 935 -4:)_ 4801 W. 50th St. 5048 Edinbrook Ave. (36) 922 -271 5225 Division St. (36) 929 -211 5345 Division St. (36) 925 -144 4370 Brookside Ct. #321 (36) 922 -207 5040 Edinbrook La. (36) 929 -102 5140 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -097 5016 Oxford Ave. (36) (24) 929 -094 5032 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -114 5145 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -808 5290 Villa Way (36) (24) 929 -225 4201 W. 50th St. 4610 Edina Blvd. (24) 922 -4879 4531 Wooddale Ave. (24) 926 -2428 4515 Edina Blvd. (24) 927 -5980 4508 W. 44th St. (24) 926 -3841 4612 Arden Ave. (24) 922 -8652 5201 Kellogg Ave. (24) 922 -6976 4801 Woodhill Way (24) 926 -1141 4612 Casco Ave. (24) 926 -2? 4528 Arden Ave. (24) 926 -0, 4520 W. 44th St. (24) 929 -81y.s 1992 General Election Judges Precinct 4 - Morningside Buildinq 1. Rachel Schoening, Chair Marion Cracraft Lois Loomis 4. Shirley Renslow 5. Jean Hubers 6. Betty Goughner 7. Lisa Bjerken 9. Mandics Krisztina 10. Theresa Carufel Precinct 5 - Highlands School 1. Rosemary McGlynn, Chair 2. Barbara Martin 3. Roe Ann Forbes 4. Anne Francis 5. Marie Goblirsch 6. Sally Olson 7. Mary E. Ryan 8. Janet Nelson 9. Ann Swanson 10. Carolyn Setterberg Drecinct 6 - Countryside School Jane Bains - Chair Catherine Swanson 3. Mary Cleaveland 4. Barbara Herbers 5. Jean Flaaten 6. Audrey Clay 7. Alice Lehrke 8. Beverly Koch 9. Marilyn Breitenbucker 10. Mae Warner Precinct 7 - Normandale Church 1. Kathleen Engquist - Chair 2. Helen Peterson 2. Ellen Nein- 3. Janet Kanofsky 4. Mary Ellen Pratt 5. Lois Strupp 6. Gertrude Snoeyenbos 7. Eunice Overby 8. Florence Mase 9. Mary Rogers 10. Shirley Rickard 5005 Doncaster Way Page Two 4114 Grimes Ave. 927 -5124 4014 Monterey Ave. (16) 922 -545 4227 Alden Dr. (16) 922 -662 4500 W. 42nd St.,(16) 926 -354 4232 France Ave. S. (16) 927 -989 4017 Natchez Ave. (16) 927 -906 4828 Townes Rd. (24) 922 -140 4405 Ellsworth Dr. (35) 922 -040 4005 Lynn Ave. (16) - 925 -058 4324 W. 42nd St. (16) 026 -684 5005 Doncaster Way 6212 4909 Rolling Green Pkwy. (36) 927 -5124 5205 Mirror Lakes Dr. (36) 929 -1808 6101 Saxony Rd. (36) 938 -7168 4909 Bywood West (36) 925 -4510 6200 Idylwood La. (36) 933 -8428 5528 Glengarry Pkwy. (36) 922 -3578. 5508 Goya La. (36) 926 -5139 5105 Lake Ridge Rd. (36) 938 -7703 5804 South Dr. (36) 927 -4663 5213 Chantrey Rd. (36) - 929 -9018 5.701 Benton Ave. 6212 6101 Tracy Ave. (36) 929 -9362 5804 Merold Dr. (36) 929 -8387 6204 Crest La. (36) 929 -5486 5801 Stuart Ave. (36) 929 -2521 5513 Warden Ave. (36) 929 -7365 5716 Wycliffe Rd. (36) 929 -3835 6120 Crescent Dr. (36) 929 -6170 6113 Westridge Blvd. (36) 929 -5069 5424 Grove St. (36) 925 -5063 6136 Sherman Cir. (36) 925 -2061 6100 Normandale Rd. 6212 Wyman Ave. (36) 929 -9497 6121 Code Ave. (36). 929 -7067 5204 W. 61st St (36) 927 -8806 5120 Windsor Ave. (36) 926 -1764 5241 Richwood Dr. (36) 929 -2382 5113'Richmond Dr. (36) 929 -5439 5125 Valley View Rd. (36) 929 -5414 5004 Kent Ave. (36) 929 -4300 5249 Richwood Dr. (36) 929 -7001 5608 Dale Ave. (36) 926 -2834 5709 Hansen Rd. (36) 929 -6043 1992 General Election Judges Page Three Precinct 8 - Southview Jr. High 4725 Southview La. 1. Jane Moran, Chair 5429 Wooddale Ave. (24) 920 -0558 2. Myra Hykes 4516 Woodland Rd. (24) 929 -7595 3. Jeanne Sedoff, 4601 Concord Terr. (24) 927 -5860 4. Ordell O'Neill 5656 Wooddale Ave. (24) 920 -6361 5. Catherine Tobin 5500 Brookview Ave. (24) 926 -1993 6. Mona Reding 5705 Woodland La. (24) 925 -3877 7. Shirley Sorenson 4024 Wood End Dr. (24) 920 -0799 8. Shirley Sallen 5717 St.. Johns Ave. (24) 927 -5039 9. Bernardine Scofield 5601 Kellogg P1. (24) 926 -5591 10. Nancy Wyatt 5645 Wooddale Ave. (24) 920 -6561 Precinct '9 - "Concord School 5900 Concord Ave. 1. Colleen Crew, Chair 6215 Halifax Ave. (24) 925 -1629 2. Florence Boughton 5921 Fairfax Ave. (24) 920 -b454 3. Marie Robinson 5928 Halifax Ave. (24) 925 -3419 4. Mary Strother 5917 Drew Ave. S. (10) 922 -8579 5. Coleen Cavell 6009 Wooddale Ave. (24) 927 -4703 6. Betty Comstock 4705 School Rd. (24) 926 -4467 7. Nancy Grimsby 5932 Wooddale Ave. (24) 922 -9403 8. Patricia Monson 6000 Ashcroft Ave. (24) 922 -1463 9. Jacqueline Lindskoog 6112 Kellogg Ave. (24) 920 -6599 10. Martha Albrecht 5300 Brookview Ave. (24) 922 -7899 Precinct 10 - Creek Valley School 6401 Gleason Rd. 1. Barbara Erlandson, Chair 6501 Nordic Dr. (39) 941 -4011 2. Carol Ladner 4931 Green Farm Ct. (36) 920 -1470 3. Connie Nelson 6215 St. Albins Cir. (36) 941 -0519 4. Milly Karr 5121 Lake Ridge Rd. (36) 938 -9283 5. Lee Strang 16 Woodland Rd. (24) 925 -3807 6. Mary Sjoquist 6713 Cheyenne Tr. (35) 941 -6187 7. Sharon Hed 6624 Iroquois Tr. (35) 944 -6456 8, Marguerite Ratelle 6716 Arrowhead Pass (35) 941 -3956 9. Ruth Haggerty 6804 Sally Lane (35) 941 -2731 10. Gladys Lidstone 6800 Sally Lane (35) 941 -4724 Precinct 11 - Creek Valley Church 6901 Tracy Ave 1. Betty Pollitt, Chair 6412 Limerick La. (39) 941 -1073 2. Karen Vickman 5201 Tifton Dr. (39) 941 -8576 3. Rita Acker 6401 Wilryan Ave. (39) 941 -9316 4. Carol Melichar 6417 Wilryan Ave. (39) 941 -4674 5. Doris Blake 6701 Southdale Rd. (35) 910 -1470 6. Mary A. Ryan 6824 Brook Dr. (39) 941 -9616 7. Muza Habeck -- 5100 Duggan Plaza (39) 941 -3959 8. Mary Ann Kubin 600 W. 66th St. (39) 941 -1307 9. Bernadine Chapman 4860 W. 64th St. (35) 922 -1370 10. Mary Kirsch 6801 Brook Dr. (39) 941 -1866 1992 General Election Judges 2recinct 12 - Christ Church 1. Shirley Bjerken - Chair 2. Ardis Wexler 3. Marlys Hittner 4. Sue Kracum 5. Mary Scholz 6, Doris Barry 7. Marge Erstad 8. JoAnne Chayer 9. Marilyn Larson 10. Doris Marchuk Precinct 13 - Centennial Lakes Park 1. Doris Peterson, Chair 2. Annadell Quantrell 3. Rebecca Larson 4. Kathleen Hansing 5. Audrey Sherman 6. D'Arcy Secord 7. Anne Matula 8. Patricia Robbins 9. Della Possis 10. Margaret Ryan Precinct 14 - St. Peters Church 1. Mary Jane Platt, Chair 2. Joyce Hanson 3. Esther Olson 4. Patricia Bartlett 5. Louise Carlson 6. Donna Brastad 7. Lavayne Finberg 8. Marcia Willett 9. Jean Reichow 10. Barbara Butler Precinct 15 - Valley View High School 1. Kaye Luikens, Chair 2. Jean Hare 3. Sharon Soderlund 4. Joann Buie 5. Carol Hanson 6. Nancy Meyer 7. Maxine Steinberg 8. Carolyn Klus 9. Virginia Sweeney Maxine Wallin Page Four 6901 Normandale Rd. 4405 Ellsworth Dr. (35) 922 -0406 49113 Larkspur La. (35) 925 -2097 4405 Dunberry La. (35) 927 -9179 4900 Payton Ct. (35) 926 -5932 4512 Gilford Dr. (35) 920 -2152 7208 Oaklawn Ave. (35) 927 -5833 4401 Dunberry La. (35) 929 -2527 4812 Wilford Way (35 922 -2015 4801 Upper Ter. (35) 922 -6240 4600 Gilford Dr. (35) 922 -4360 7499 France Ave. S. Claredon Dr. (39) 4120 Parklawn ave. (35) 835 -7951 4380 Parklawn Ave. (35) 897 -1763 4415 Parklawn Cr. (35) 835 -0923 4741 Hibiscus Ave. (35) 926 -1177 4120 Parklawn Ave. #130 (35) 831 -2200 4428 Gilford Dr. (35) 920 -4502 4145 Parklawn Ave. (35) 830 -1069 4101 Parklawn Ave. (35) 844 -0647 6339 Barrie Rd. (35) 927 -8826 4075 W. 51st St. (24) 920 -5022 5421 France Ave. S. Claredon Dr. (39) 5504 Beard Ave. S. (10) 926 -8447 5829 Drew Ave. S. (10) 926 -8856 5441 York Ave. S. (10) 926 -1006 6012 Zenith Ave. S. (10) 926 -0142 3700 Chowen Curve (10) 926 -6253 5701 Chowen Ave. S. (10) 926 -3468 3808 W. 57th St. (10) 920 -4867 5809 Beard Ave. S. (10) 922 -1275 5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (39) 941 -4054 4005 W. 62nd St. (24) 926 -3596 6750 Valley View Rd. 7310 Claredon Dr. (39) 944 -1016 6917 Mark Terrace Dr. (39) 944 -3877 7108 Mark Terrace Dr. (39) 944 -7449 6224 Braeburn Cir. (39) 941 -7979 5908 Chapel Dr. (39) 944 -2759 6001 Dublin Cit. (39) 941 -4178 5719 Long Break Tr. (39) 941 -4637 7017 Valley View Rd. (39) 941 -5195 7129 Gleason Rd. (39) 941 -4225 7022 Tupa Cir. 55439 941 -4628 1992 General Election Judges Precinct 16 - Cornelia School I. Mary McDonald, Chair 2. Donna Montgomery 3. Patricia Halvorsen 4. Mary Ann Hans 5. Marlys Chase 6. Katherine Saunders 7. Phyllis Woodley 8. Yvonne Ford 9. Nathalie Person 10. Madeleine Dobbelmann Precinct 17 - Church of the Master 1. Lorna Livingston, Chair 2. Jean McDermid 3. Louise Jackson 4. Betty Lou Petersen 5. Shirley Breitman 6. Theresa Brown 7. Vernette Wessman 8. Lorraine Welch 9. Joanna Bigler 10. Lois Awes Precinct 18 - Edinborough Park 1. Jean Erdall, Chair 2. Selma Shelton 3. Mary Zotalis 4. Virginia Stemm 5. Jo Anne Streed 6. Nancy Lichy 7. Joy Perunovich 8. Vera Krause 9. Ruth Downey 10. Gertrude Rocheford Precinct 19 - Brookview Church 1. Patricia Olander, Chair 2. Anita Delegard 3. Lynne Westphal 4. Harriet Koch 5. Rosemary Booth 6. Joan Ochs 7. Diane Ebert 8. Marie Nelson 9. Alice Olson 10. Ardis Stevenson . .0 Page Five 7000 Cornelia Dr. 6929 Southdale Road (35) 926 -78L 6824 Oaklawn Ave. (35) 920 -9044 6700 Xerxes Ave. S. (23) 869 -0366 6913 Southdale Rd. (35) 926 -0765 6933 Southdale Rd. (35) 926 -8193 6304 York Ave, S, (35) 925 -9750 6845 Oaklawn Ave. (35) 920 -3375 6308 Barrie Rd. 2D (35) 922 -6606 4520 Laguna Dr. (35) 922 -4547 6405 Colony Way (35) 929 -5383 7128 France Ave. S. 7001 5920 Wooddale Ave. (24) 926 -5322 5116 Mirror Lakes 6455 Dr. (36) 929 -8859 6016 Zenith Ave. S. (10) 927 -8279 4313 Cornelia Cir. (35) 926 -9523 7200 York Ave. S. (35) 897 -1043 7240 York Ave. S. (35) 832 -9329 6415 York Ave. S. (35) 929 -8739 7313 Wet Shore Dr. (35) 926 -2451 7201 York Ave. S. #411 (35) 897 -1668 605 Colony Way (35) 926 -4567 7700 York Ave. 7001 6101 Abbott Ave. (10) 922 -92i 7200 York Ave. S. (35) 831 -8863 6455 York Ave. S. (35) 925 -9537 7607 York Ave. S. (35) 835 -1445 7350 York Ave. S. #211 (35) 835 -9019 4908 Hibiscus Ave. (35) 926 -7634 6805 Brook Dr. (39) 941 -2608 3111 Heritage Dr. (35) 926 -1120 6085 Lincoln Dr. (36) 938 -0343 5928 Merold Dr. (36) 929 -2392 5017 W. 70th St. 7001 Lee Valley Cir. (39) 944 -2185 7209 Lanham La. (39) 941 -5056 5704 Kemrich Dr. (39) 941 -8493 5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (39) 944 -0271 6109 St. Johns Ave. (24) 929 -0566 7500 Cahill Rd. (39) 829 -7511 7004 Lee Valley Cir. (39) 944 -2666 5925 Halifax Ave. (24) 922 -2957 6324 Pheasant Ct. (36) 929 -6272 4075 W. 51st St. (24) 922 -8719 Cn 0 • f ~�bAalae/����� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 Subject: METRO 2015 Recommendation: Info /Background Agenda Item # v.E . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Attached is a letter dated August 25, 1992, addressed to Mary Anderson, Chair of the Metropolitan Council from Vern Peterson, Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. This letter represents the response of AMM's Metropolitan Agencies Committee and Housing and Economic Development Committee, relative to the Metropolitan Council's 2015 Study. Also attached is a copy of the Metro 2015 study. August 25, 1992 Ms. Mary Anderson, Chair Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. 5th. St. St. Paul, MN. 55101 Dear Chair Anderson: On behalf of the AMM's Metropolitan Agencies Committee and the Housing and Economic Development Committee, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Council's Metro 2015 Vision and Goals document. We commend the Council for developing a draft for consideration by the public. More importantly, we commend the Council for this new visioning effort. As you know, the AMM's Metropolitan Governance Task Force in its preliminary report issued earlier this year, recommended that the Council re- emphasize its Visionary Role. The specific recommendation states "the Metropolitan Council should seize upon its earlier ability to identify the problems of the future and outline steps and consequences of solving those problems. This metropolitan area needs a strong voice and strong leadership to help guide the area into the future. The Metropolitan Council has the opportunity to help advance the metropolitan area into the next century. It should not hesitate to seize the opportunity to explore aspects of metropolitan life and living and probe them; not to do so could mean stagnation for this area." The AMM committees generally agree with the `vision' as foreseen for 2015 and the six major factors listed at the bottom of page one which will drive the vision: economic, governance, transportation, telecommunication, education and quality of life. The tricky part, however, is turning this vision into reality and the key challenge that you and the residents of this region face is identifying and implementing the `specifics' that will make that happen. It is important that you and the residents of this area realize that the visioning work has just began and this document is just step one. The AMM -as mentioned earlier is very supportive of this `visioning effort' but we do have a few specific comments we ask you to consider. The comments are: -1- 1. Add a new goal on page 6 which reads: "Strengthen the transformative sector of the economy and focus on highvalue -added manufacturing jobs ". 2. The AMM commends the Council for recognizing that this region must compete in a world economy and not just against other regions of the USA. The Council can and should play a role in promoting the concept that we are a region when its comes to competing economically in'a world market and not 139 individual cities. 3. We recommend clarifying goal 5 on page 7. The second and third sentences should be modified to read as follows: The Council decides how federal and state funds allocated to the Metropolitan Area for regional public infrastructure will be spent. It decides on major direct and indirect public investments that support facilities of regional significance located within the Metropolitan Area. 4. Two sentences should be added to Goal 5 to read as follows: The Council will manage the regional infrastructure investment to promote a geographically balanced orderly, economic development of the metropolitan area. This includes balancing the needs between new development and redevelopment of the more mature parts of the region., 5. The committees strongly supports.the emphasize on telecommunication as delineated on pages 11 and 12. 6. The committees strongly recommend that another subsection be added to the section dealing with quality of life: The AMM has a long standing concern about the need for more, good affordable housing to meet the needs of the lower income residents of.this region. We have urged the council to continue its regional role in the provision of such housing. since adequate, affordable.housing is so essential to the well being of this region, this `visioning' document should place more emphasize on housing and shelter. The committees Also believe more emphasize should be added to neighborhood preservation which is closely related to housing, transportation, education and well paying jobs. 7. The AMM believes some modification should be made to section C. Physical Environment on pages 19, 20, and 21. We suggest adding a new challenge at the bottom of page 5 to read: .Polluted.soils are preventing the highest and.best use of much good land in the older, developed areas of this region. Under goals on page 20, add a new goal which states: `Remove impediments to development of well paid jobs including the clean -up of polluted lands so they can be redeveloped to highest and best use'. -2- The committees believe that the Council must play a strong leadership role if this region is to achieve the `vision' as delineated in this document for the year 2015. It also must be recognized that the private sector and local units of government, particularly cities where most metropolitan area residents live, must be active participants in this process or the `vision' will not be achieved. We suggest that verbage be added to this document in the appropriate section to spell out the role the Council sees cities playing in this process. Again, the AMM appreciates this opportunity to provide input and we look forward to working with the Metropolitan Council on behalf of our member cities as we move towards the 21st. century. Sincerely, Vern Peterson, Executive Director -3- o e A Cn �A��. -� .�° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VI.A From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PETITION FOR STREET To Council LIGHTING - VALLEY VIEW RD & MOCCASIN VALLEY RD Action � Motion RESIDENTS ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition for street lighting at the Valley View Road and Moccasin Valley Road intersection to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Info /Background: The attached petition for street lighting dated September 1, 1992, was received from property owners on Valley View Road and Moccasin Valley Road. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ❑SIDEWALK ❑ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑SANITARY SEWER TREET G ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑PERMANENT STREET ❑OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. Vh o cc ►4S � l,l V ALA Y 1A;4 p NI'F-l/SEcT►9 W VALLEY I/IEI J ROAD 4- between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) /'�A!/ A4 -A L rZa�� catiRELI�> I4akO l d PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE // i �/,t°� / q4-11- �'as �RK10\)�Z CAniF1Ex -17 6rj3t�- VALLE y VIELj 1200 ay1 7ya9 NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1880 AGENDA ITEM VI.B MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Deputy Chief Kleven DATE: September 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Memorandum From Residents of Trillium and Lantana Lanes On September 16, 1992, I contacted Ms. Suzanne Wolfe, 4812 Trillium Lane, a spokesperson for the neighborhood safety concerns. After a lengthy discussion, it was agreed to refer this matter to the Traffic Enforcement Unit for traffic monitoring and request Public Works install speed limit signs for north and southbound traffic on the frontage road. cc: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM. September, 1992 To: Members of the Edina City Council From: The Undersigned Edina Residents (from Trillium and Lantana Lanes) Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our Area Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast. (Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road [Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a problem.) Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed. is potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in the area. We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children. Name - ./ t Address q!0 q '7i2 iLL iLZ /.A, /- -i.,,, � 7 -'A)L`1 y>VI 4r-l�' ifir'(. 'n ti' T4 tiA b'6 q!0 q '7i2 iLL iLZ /.A, /- -i.,,, � 7 -'A)L`1 y>VI 4r-l�' ifir'(. 'n MEMORANDUNI September, 1992 To: Members of the Edina City Council From: The Undersigned Edina Residents (from Trillium and Lantana Lanes) Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our ..Area Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast. (Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road [Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a problem.) Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed is potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in the area., We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the. Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children. Name Address Y9a,I �/ , MEMORANDUM September, 1992 To: Members of the Edina City .Council From: The Undersigned Edina Residents (from Trillium and Lantana Lanes) Subj: Traffic Speed and Young Children in our Area Over the past few years, we have observed an increased volume of traffic on Trillium Lane, and, more disturbingly, increased speed as well. A curve in the street gives pedestrians little warning that an approaching car is going very fast. (Trillium Lane is among the flower -named streets south of 70th Street and just to the east of Highway 100. This area is typically entered via the Frontage Road [Normandale Road]. Based on location, one would not guess traffic to be a problem.) Demographics of our area have changed in recent years as well, with a significant influx of young children. For example, on the block of Trillium Lane west of Larkspur and the adjacent intersection of Lantana Lane, there are now 14 young children (infant to pre- teen). The trend toward increased traffic speed is potentially serious in the light of the increase in the number of young children in the area. We bring the matter of increased traffic speed in our area to your attention knowing that the safety of all children is a matter of significant concern to the Edina City Council. Perhaps the remedy lies in increased surveillance, speed limit enforcement, and new signage. We would favor a posted speed limit sign at the Frontage Road, or a "Slow -- Children" sign in the same location, or at both ends of Trillium. We ask that the Council study our situation, and implement an appropriate remedy to protect the safety of our area children. Name ceases BE A; Address i 69 010 __ n' 1'1 i wQ I o I LL,dn /` -4kr 4' 9 a 9 4r,-� Ate_ AGENDA ITEM VIX Scott Harr Attorney at Law 5209 Danens Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 (612) 942 -9151 September 11, 1992 Kenneth Rosland, City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Aircraft Noise Dear Mr. Rosland, I am writing to request that the City of Edina take a position concerning the increased aircraft noise over our City. Noise levels have noticeably increased this summer, and Northwest Airlines has admitted that it does not intend to abide by voluntary noise limits. I grew up in Edina, and returned to purchase my own home here. Therefore, I have some 30 years experience with aircraft noise levels. The noise has become excessive, with aircraft starting to fly overhead as early as 6 a.m. , and as late as 10 p.m., frequently one after another at 60 second intervals. This is not how things have been in the past, and it should not be permitted to continue. For the first time, I have found myself considering the necessity of moving. The aircraft noise wakes our family, disrupts conversation, and in general creates a nuisance that the City should not tolerate. I encourage the Edina City Administration and the City Council to take a position by advising the Metropolitan Airports Commission that the increased noise levels are- excessive and should not be permitted to continue, and that at a minimum, the voluntary noise levels agreed to by the airlines need to be complied with. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Scott Harr cc: Mr-.--Jeff Hamiel, Airport Director Metropolitan Airports Commission Mr. Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines 0 Scott Han Attorney at Law 5209 Danens Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 (612) 942 -9151 September 11, 1992 Mr. Jeff Hamiel, Airport Director Metro Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 RE: Aircraft Noise Dear Mr. Hamiel: I am writing to express my concern over the excessive aircraft noise over and around my residence. I have clearly been aware of excessive noise, and I am not exaggerating when I state that it may occur as early as 6 a.m., going as late as 10 p.m, with hours at a time when aircraft are passing overhead at 60 second intervals. The noise wakes my family, interrupts conversations, and is generally a nuisance. I have lived on the same street for 30 years, both growing up and eventually purchasing a house there, so I have a basis of awareness of aircraft noise level over the years. It has become excessive. I was distressed to recently read that Northwest Airlines no longer intends to abide by the voluntary noise limits, which I find appalling. When I recently called the noise abatement office, I was led to believe that "wind direction" was the culprit. The news reports I am now reading indicate that NWA, and possibly other airlines, are intentionally contributing to this problem by increasing flights and bringing in older, louder aircraft. I strongly urge MAC to take a very strong position in enforcing reasonable noise limits. I have asked the City of Edina to take a position on this matter, and will continue to work towards this end. Sinc , Scott Harr cc: Frederick Richards, Edina City Mayor Kenneth Rosland, Edina City Manager Edina City Council Mr. Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines HA c9� MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 9 Q\� 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard �yED 0�`'� Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 -1597 office: (612) 939 -8320 fax: (612) 939 -8244 DISTRICT COORDINATOR: Ellen B. Klanderman BOARD OF MANAGERS: James R. Spensley, Pres. - John E. Thomas - Thomas W. LaBounty Robert D. Erickson - C. Woodrow Love - Clardson Lindley* Thomas Maple, Jr. September 15, 1992 To City Administrator: LAKE AGENDA ITEM: VII.A. The Hennepin Conservation District is currently making available funds to combat infestations of Eurasian Water Milfoil. These funds will be used to provide financial assistance to local governments and community groups. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was given the opportunity to apply for these supplementary funds. The District will be submitting their application this fall, and, if approved by the Hennepin Conservation District, will be chemically treating several locations throughout the metro area. The areas that are currently infested with milfoil are Minnehaha Creek, Meadowbrook Lake in St. Louis Park, Mill Pond in Edina, and possibly Lake Hiawatha and Nokomis if infestation has reached those bodies of water. It is in the interest of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to contact appropriate municipalities to determine the level of support cities are willing to donate towards this project. Even though cost - sharing funds may be available through Hennepin County, the District encourages each city to consider playing an active role in combating milfoil by becoming a contributing sponsor. I would appreciate a reply by September 30 regarding your interest in supporting the milfoil program. I have enclosed a copy of the July 1992 Land & Water Conservation publication which briefly describes the milfoil control program that is being implemented by the Hennepin Conservation District. Sincerely, Ellen B. Klanderman District Coordinator Enc. (over) Land &Water Conservation Published Quarterly by the Hennepin Conservation District July 1992 Hennepin County Milfoil Control Program The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has provided the Hennepin Conservation Dis- trict with funds to combat infesta- tions of Eurasian Water Milfoil. These funds will be used to provid financial assistance to local gover ments and community groups in Hennepin County for milfoil control activities. Twenty water bodies in Hennepin County are infested with Eurasian Water Milfoil (Table 1). Recommended treatment practices vary with the level of infestation. Early detection of infestations is important because the plant spreads rapidly and once established is difficult to control. Eurasian water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) may be iden- tified by: -long stems with feather -like leaves attached in whorls of four, - leaves typically having nine to 21 pairs of leaflets; - flowers appearing terminally on the stem above the water; and - formation of mats at the surface. Volume 3 Number 3 Leaf Leaflet pair Leaf whorl arrangement Somoe: MN DNR Persons interested in applying for financial assistance for milfoil control activities should con- tact Carolyn Dindorf or Joel Settles at the Hennepin Conservation District (544 - 8572). 4} Hennepin County Ground Water Plan The Hennepin County Ground Water Plan has been distributed to all cities, watershed districts, and watershed management organizations in the county. Two meetings have been held with city and water- shed representatives to informally discuss changes and improvements to the plan before it is submitted for formal review. A discussion on specific sugges- tions about the plan will occur at the next meeting which will be held in late July. Suggestions received to date concern language that is insufficiently flexible to account for existing land uses. Participants also voiced concern about the effectiveness and practicality of the organization that would be used to coordinate local activities for ground water protection. Hennepin Conservation District staff is currently considering these concerns and suggestions. The plan calls for cities to integrate ground water protection into their existing planning, inspection, licensing, and zoning activities. Cities I Hennepin continued on page 2 f� COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM COUNCIL DATE 9/21/92 page 1 CHECK• ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. M 130186 09/21/92 $185.03 3M CO SIGNS & POSTS TP75506 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 3491 < "> $185.03" 130188 09/21/92 $667.81 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $107.54 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $134.42 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $667.81 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $107.54 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $430.15 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $107.54 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $53.77 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $161.30 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $645.23 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $144.29 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $364.16 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $425.87 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 BUILDING & GRO RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $36.75 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $63.63 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $159.22 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOV 09/21/92 $54.57 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/92 GUN RANGE RUBBISH REMOV < *> $4,331.60* 130189 09/21/92 $40.91 AEI ELECTRONIC PARTS REPAIR PARTS 086432 -0 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3526 < *> $40.91" 130190 09/21/92 $173.71 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 1475b3 ADMINISTRATION BLUE PRINTING <•> $173.71* 130192 09/21/92 $40.00 ALL FIRE TEST INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4738 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 09/21/92 $41.45 ALL FIRE TEST INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4738 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 09/21/92 $245.40 ALL FIRE TEST INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4862 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 2373 09/21/92 $159.63 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $9.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $36.13 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $36.13 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $63.25 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $34.00 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $31.48 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $153.36 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $26.78 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 719.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $9.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $9.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $461.21 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT EQUIPMENT OPER PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $36.45 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $31.95 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $189.89 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT PW BUILDING PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $9.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT 50TH ST OCCUPA PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $29.40 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $9.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT VERNON OCCUPAN PROF S RVICES 09/21/92 $26.00 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT YORK OCCUPANCY PROF S RVICES 09/21/92 $89.98 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT ARENA BLDG /GRO PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $104.00 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEPT BUILDING & GRO PROF SERVICES < ■> $1,903.49* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 2 CHECK# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM. OBJECT P.O. # 130193 09/21/92 $498.68 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 8319 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS - - - - -- 3550 < *> $498.68* 130194 09/21/92 $11.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST LABORATORY LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $47.12 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $55.12 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $142.02 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $44.79 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $224.25 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY AUGUST CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $38.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 083192 GRILL LAUNDRY < *> $562.88* 130195 09/21/92 $20.00 ANOKA COUNTY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 082892 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL 3300 < *> $20.00* 130196 09/21/92 $65.03 ARROYO TIRE COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 47462 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 3279 < *> $65.03* 130197 09/21/92 $10.00 ASIAN GANG INVESTIGA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 091492 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR < *> $10.00* 130198 09/21/92 $206.75 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 46190 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOO 3896 < *> 1 $206.75* 130199 09/21/92 $28.89 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 0826P2 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE < *> $28.89* 130200 09/21/92 $66.00 AWWA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 090492 DISTRIBUTION DUES & SUBSCR < *> $66.00* 130201 09/21/92 $13.18 AXT -LYLE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 091092 GUN RANGE CST OF GD F00 < *> $13.18* 130202 09/21/92 $535.80 BACHMANS NURSERY WHO CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 44703 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 3852 < *> $535.80* 130203 09/21/92 $186.00 BALCH, CAROL GENERAL SUPPLIES 091592 POOL ADMIN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $186.00* 130204 09/21/92 $225.00 BARR ENG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13636 -18 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $871.96 BARR ENG CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 13637 -18 GC CIP CIP < *> $1,096.96* 130205 09/21/92 $475.00 BARRY SIEWERT CREATI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 090292 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 3843 < *> $475.00* 130206 09/21/92 $3,600.00 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 018576 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACE 1669 < *> $3,600.00* 130207 09/21/92 $1,269.51 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 083192 GRILL CST OF,GDS BE 09/21/92 $1,713.40 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF'GDS BE 09/21/92 $901.35 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $107.00 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $1,514.75 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $5,506.01* A. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 3 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. N ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130208 09/21/92 $100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PER$ SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130209 09/21/92 $46.50 BENSON OPTICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 751852 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $46.50* 130210 09/21/92 $243.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI JULY /DUP YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 09/21/92 $262.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI JULY /DUP VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 09/21/92 $345.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI JULY /DUP 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ 09/21/92 $219.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI AUG YORK YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 09/21/92 $147.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI AUG /50TH 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ 09/21/92 $229.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI AUG /VERN VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ < *> $1,446.00* 130211 09/21/92 $15.49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 813382 CENT SVC GENER OFFICE SUPPLI 09/21/92 $74.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 813872 PARK ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLI 09/21/92 $4.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 813384 CENT SVC GENER OFFICE SUPPLI 09/21/92 $10.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815264 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $7.05 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815264 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $8.30 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815264 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $122.99 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815264 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $30.74 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815264 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $3.14 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 815990 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $66.09 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 816203 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLI 3881 < *> $342.93* 1 130212 09/21/92 $34,233.55 BFI RECYCLING SYS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 090192 RECYCLING EQUIP RENTAL < *> 534,233.55* 130213 09/21/92 $104.52 BFU SERVICE GROUP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 2137214 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQU < *> $104.52* 130214 09/21/92 $7,359.00 BHK &R INSURANCE 1585 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $7,359.00* 130215 09/21/92 $1,883.06 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 062660 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP < *> $1,883.06* 130216 09/21/92 $14.38 BLACK & DECKER REPAIR PARTS 020 -4718 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3630 < *> $14.38* 130217 09/21/92 $75.00 BLAIN, JUDY SERVICES /ART CENTER 091192 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 130218 09/21/92 $100.00 BLOOD DAVID PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES <*> $100.00* 130219 09/21/92 $21.70 BOWLER, WILLIAM MEETING EXPENSE 090992 FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPEN < *> $21.70* 130220 09/21/92 $45.79 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 159245 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR'PARTS 3609 < *> $45.79* 130221 09/21/92 $535.78 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 251756 . CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE 09/21/92 - $248.19 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES CM252431 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 4 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # =- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130221 09/21/92 $1.08 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 252555 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE - - - - 09/21/92 $14.59 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 251756 -1 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE 09/21/92 $5.38 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 253853 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE < *> $308.64* 130222 09/21/92 $229.64 BROWNELLS INC AMMUNITION A281569 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3449 < *> $229.64* 130223 09/21/92 $1,586.25 BRW INC. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 66122 STREET IMPROV. CIP < *> $1,586.25* 130224 09/21/92 $85.91 BUSINESS RECD CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 8792310 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPL < *> $85.91* 130225 09/21/92 $100.00 BUTLER GEORGE PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130226 09/21/92 $247.68 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 140988 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOO 3080 09/21/92 $402.85 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 140989 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 3373 09/21/92 $326.87 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 141084 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 3509 09/21/92 $380.92 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 141096 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GO F00 3507 < *> $1,358.32* 130227 09/21/92 $2,518.00 C.O. CARLSON AIR CON CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT 4085 GOLF PROG CLUB HOUSE EQ 1286 09/21/92 $3,440.00 C.O. CARLSON AIR CON CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT 4173, GOLF PROG CLUB HOUSE EQ 1286 < *> $5,958.00* 130228 09/21/92 $112,587.19 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONST CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -8 STREET IMPROV. CIP < *> $112,587.19* 130229 09/21/92 $50.00 CALGREN, MEGAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 083192 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00* 130230 09/21/92 $149.80 CALLAHAN,FRAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 080292 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $149.80* 130231 09/21/92 $258.05 CARLSON PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 55396 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL < *> $258.05* 130232 09/21/92 $121.45 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 082192/P DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL < *> $121.45* 130233 09/21/92 $249.78 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPL CRAFT SUPPLIES 14446 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 2816 < *> $249.78* 130234 09/21/92 $383.80 CITY BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $120.30 CITY BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $504.10* 130235 09/21/92 $368.00 CITY OF ROBBINSDALE MEETING EXPENSE 091492 CONTINGENCIES MEETIN9 EXPEN < *> $368.00* 130236 09/21/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CONTRACTED REPAIRS 35151 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 09/21/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CONTRACTED REPAIRS 35152 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 09/21/92 $13.50 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV CONTRACTED REPAIRS 35153 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 5 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # <*> $40.50* 130237 09/21/92 $677.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 083192 VANVALKENBURG CST OF GD F00 09/21/92 $68.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 083192 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD F00 09/21/92 $514.77 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $329.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $817.33 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $2,407.35* 130238 09/21/92 $142.00 COCKRIEL, VINCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 081192 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $142.00* 130239 09/21/92 $250.00 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6469 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACE 3781 < *> $250.00* 130240 09/21/92 $36.91 COMTECH INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 021076 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $36.91* 130241 09/21/92 3233.00 CRAGUNS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 091492 CIVIL DEFENSE PROF SERVICES < *> $233.00* 130242 09/21/92 $65.00 CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 090392 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCR < *> 1 $65.00* 130243 09/21/92 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS TIMOTHY J M PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OCTOPER FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $1,386.67* 130244 09/21/92 $491.25 CURTIS 1000 FIRE PREVENTION 7050101 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTI 2385 < *> 5491.25* 130245 09/21/92 $64.90 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 55800 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 3677 < *> $64.90* 130246 09/21/92 $179.85 DANIEL SMITH COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 63980 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 3508 < *> $179.85* 130247 09/21/92 $496.89 DAVIES WATER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 30445 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 3625 < *> $496.89* 130248 09/21/92 $842.40 DCA INC HOSPITALIZATION 51124 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $842.40* 130249 09/21/92 $50.00 DIECKHAUS, KIP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 090292 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOL < *> $50.00* 130250 09/21/92 $46.90 DPC INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS 00927704 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS < *> $46.90* 130251 09/21/92 $257.65 E -Z SHARP INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 3354 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3853 < *> $257.65* f 130252 09/21/92 $128.29 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0322867 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3516 09/21/92 $242.22 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0326700 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3572 < *> $370.51* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 6 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # - - - --- -------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--- 130253 09/21/92 $91.94 E.A. SWEEN COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 10725508 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD F00 3897 < *> $91.94* 130254 09/21/92 $113.09 E.J. BROOKS COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 35425 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPL 3504 < *> $113.09* 130255 09/21/92 $112.12 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 603504 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $345.31 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 603410 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $16.76 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 606015 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $110.68 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 606011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $584.87* 130256 09/21/92 $84.88 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 117753 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 3456 < *> $84.88* 130257 09/21/92 $10,502.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $141.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $62.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $2,626.98 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $374.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $7,316.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $21,024.88* 130258 09/21/92 $85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 1936994 BUILDING & GRO SVC CONTR EQU < *> $85.00* 130259 09/21/92 $71.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 30920 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $23.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30945 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $94.60* 130260 09/21/92 $12.00 EDINA SOUTHDALE PHYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 082592 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $12.00* 130261 09/21/92 $37.82 EGGE, EVELYN J AMBULANCE FEES 090992 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $37.82* 130262 09/21/92 $58.96 ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. REPAIR PARTS 111912 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3458 < *> $58.96* 130263 09/21/92 $64.58 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 540700 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3487 < *> $64.58* 130264 09/21/92 $223.65 ENGLAND PRESS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 52729 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 3587 < *> $223.65* 130265 09/21/92 $181.05 ENVIORMATIC CORP OF SERVICE CONT -RACTS EQU 41844 GRILL SVC CONTR EQU 3621 < *> $181.05* 130266 09/21/92 $109.50 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 15003 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 2961 < *> $109.50* 130267 09/21/92 $30,400.00 FAIRWAY ARCHITECTS I CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 090992 GC CIP CIP < *> $30,400.00* 130268 09/21/92 $31.36 FAST i HOUR PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 06658 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 7 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # -- < *> $31.36* - - - - 130269 09/21/92 $29.25 FEDERAL EXPRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4- 756 -71 GC CIP CIP < "> $29.25* 130270 09/21/92 $1,484.50 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPPL 185105 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT S < *> $1,484.50* 130271 09/21/92 $25.56 FERRELLGAS CRAFT SUPPLIES 100668 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 3380 < "> $25.56* 130272 09/21/92 $304.20 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100111 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $304.20* 130273 09/21/92 $111.83 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO ALARM SERVICE 87499 ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE < *> $111.83* 130274 09/21/92 $3,358.00 FRANK B HALL & CO INSURANCE 087558 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < "> $3,358.00* 130275 09/21/92 $116.62 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 2266 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTH 3299 < *> $116.62* 130276 09/21/92 $98.84 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082192 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $382.32 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082112 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $779.49 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082192 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $285.62 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082192 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $486.48 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082192 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 09/21/92 $242.06 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 082192 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 09/21/92 $43.08 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 082192 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY < *> $2,317.89* 130277 09/21/92 $2,090.71 G & T TRUCKING COMPA SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 70258 STREET RENOVAT SAND,GRVL & R 09/21/92 $415.79 G & T TRUCKING COMPA SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 70259 STREET RENOVAT SAND,GRVL & R 3813 09/21/92 $2,504.70 G & T TRUCKING COMPA SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 70260 STREET RENOVAT SAND,GRVL & R 5146 < *> $5,011.20* 130278 09/21/92 $4,505.77 G.L. CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 29274 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3690 < *> $4,505.77* 130279 09/21/92 $405.38 GENERAL BINDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 12541016 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $405.38* 130280 09/21/92 $7.85 GLIMSDAHL, CINDY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 090492 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. < "> $7.85* 130281 09/21/92 $497.56 GOPHER OIL CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 466255 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3649 < *> $497.56* 130282 09/21/92 $25.00* GOVERNMENT TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 091492 INSPECTIONS CONF &SCHOOL 130283 09/21/92 $480.00 GRAPP, JEAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 091592 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $480.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 8 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130284 09/21/92 $46.34 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 104 -5147 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3533 09/21/92 $45.99 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 104 -5170 BUILDING & GRO REPAIR PARTS 3309 09/21/92 $93.46 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 104 -3651 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3784 < *> $185.79* 130285 09/21/92 $2,359.55 GUNDERSON BROTHERS C CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -6 SIDEWALKS CIP <*> $2,359.55* 130286 09/21/92 $280.00 GUST, MARGARET AC INSTRUCTOR 091592 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $280.00* 130287 09/21/92 $105.00 GUY SPEAKER CO REPAIR PARTS 9165 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS < *> $105.00* 130288 09/21/92 $299.12 H &L MESABI ACCESSORIES 021020 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3628 < *> $299.12* 130289 09/21/92 $127.80 HACH CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 843389 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPL 34.79 < *> $127.80* 130290 09/21/92 $51.40 HALLMAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 135058 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 3400 < *> $51.40* 130291 09/21/92 $61,391.60 HARDRIVES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -7 STREET IMPROV. CIP < *> $61,391.60* 130292 09/21/92 $3,530.00 HARMON CONTRACT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3212516 BUILDING & GRO CIP <■> $3,530.00* 130293 09/21/92 $26.88 HARMON GLASS REPAIR PARTS 72001602 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3716 <r.- $26.88* 130294 09/21/92 $450,000.00 HARRIS BANK DUE FROM HRA 080392 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 09/21/92 $49,050.00 HARRIS BANK DUE FROM HRA 080392 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 09/21/92 $360.00 HARRIS BANK DUE FROM HRA 080392 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $499,410.00* 130295 09/21/92 $100.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 080692 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 09/21/92 $2,681.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 083192 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 09/21/92 $4,394.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 083192 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 09/21/92 $54,855.70 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 083192 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $62,030.70* 130296 09/21/92 $32.40 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE 091592 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 09/21/92 $68.98* HEDGES, DIANA OFFICE SUPPLIES /ART C 091592 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLI < *> 130297 09/21/92 $42.06 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 083192 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 09/21/92 $355.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 892 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $397.06* 130298 09/21/92 $59.90 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 0175075 BUILDING & GRO PAINT 3578 < *> $59.90* 130299 09/21/92 $63.05 HOBART CORP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 997317 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 9 CHECK* DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $63.05* 130300 09/21/92 $90.10 HOFFERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 189410 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 3654 < *> $90.10* 130301 09/21/92 $100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130302 09/21/92 $4.26 HOOTENS LAUNDRY 082192 POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY < *> $4.26* 130303 09/21/92 $864.00 HORWATH, TOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 090992 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $114.52 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 090992 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE < *> $978.52* 130304 09/21/92 $410.82 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER METER 5025 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WAT 8536 09/21/92 $117.21 HYDRO SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS 5041 METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 8536 < *> $528.03* 130305 09/21/92 $2,303.50 I -494 CORRODOR COMMI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 082592 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $2,303.50* 130306 Ob/21/92 $298.25 IMPULSE CONCEPTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3472 -2 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 3902 < *> $298.25* 130307 09/21/92 $79.45 INTERIOR COM SYS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0392b6 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $79.45* 130308 09/21/92 $79.88 INTOXIMETERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 92009186 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 3679 < *> $79.88* 130309 09/21/92 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130310 09/21/92 $40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 091592 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $40.00* 130312 09/21/92 $34.06 JERRYS HARDWARE PRINTING AUGUST RECYCLING PRINTING 09/21/92 $15.00 'JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT AUGUST CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 09/21/92 $42.15 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS AUGUST BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 09/21/92 $127.68 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS AUGUST CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 09/21/92 $162.43 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS AUGUST EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 09/21/92 $28.52 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $31.09 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST SIDEWALKS & PA GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $13.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $201.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $74.54 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $18.50 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $67.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $207.60 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST PUMP & LIFT ST GENERA4 SUPPL 09/21/92 $283.79 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $165.65 JERRYS HARDWARE DUE FROM HRA AUGUST GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 09/21/92 $35.68 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $28.75 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $32.85 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 10 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130312 09/21/92 $20.23 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $40.45 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $18.32 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $224.37 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $43.86 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $15.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $7.92 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $3.35 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $10.09 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $5.31 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES AUGUST RECYCLING GENERAL SUPPL < *> $1,960.62* 130313 09/21/92 $600.00 JEWISH WORLD ADVERTISING OTHER 083192 ADMINISTRATION ADVERT OTHER 2834 < *> $600.00* 130314 09/21/92 $100.00 JOHNSON WALTER PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130315 09/21/92 $9.80 JOHNSON, NAOMI ART WORK SOLD 081592 ART CNTR PROG RETAIL SALES 09/21/92 $144.22 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE 081592 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 09/21/92 $15.38 JOHNSON, NAOMI PRINTING /ART CENTER 081592 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING <*> $169.40* 130316 09/21/92 $30.00 JOHNSON, RALPH CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 091092 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOL < *> $30.00* 130317 09/21/92 $212.84 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 65052 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPL 3444 < *> $212.84* 130318 09/21/92 $151.27 KAIRIES, WALTER OR D AMBULANCE FEES 090992 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $151.27* 130319 09/21/92 $147.52 KAR PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 707515 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3593 < *> $147.52* 130320 09/21/92 $77.75 KATTREH, ANN OFFICE SUPPLIES 090892 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLI <*> $77.75* 130321 09/21/92 $66.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 024656 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 09/21/92 $10.33 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 02170247 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 2916 09/21/92 $14.89 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 028918 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 3518 09/21/92 $167.92 KNOX COMA CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 029391 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPL 3547 09/21/92 $12.77 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 029727 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3626 09/21/92 $63.67 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 029790 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3632 09/21/92 $125.11 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 029809 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPL 3637 09/21/92 $36.63 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 030107 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3607 09/21/92 $311.93 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 030243 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3705 09/21/92 $7.22 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 030994 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3824 < *> $816.47* 130322 09/21/92 $4,751.12 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 0807593 STREET RENOVAT ROAD Ott 1371 09/21/92 $4,730.27 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 0811273 STREET RENOVAT ROAD OIL 1371 09/21/92 $4,378.29 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 0812469 STREET RENOVAT ROAD OIL 1371 < *> $13,859.68* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 11 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # . - -+ 130323 - rr - - -- rrr--r-rr----rrrrrrrrrr-rr--rr.rrrr-rrrrrrr 09/21/92 $5,036.65 KUETHER DIST. CO. r- rr-- _-- _---- r- ---- rrr- COST OF GOODS SOLD BE r -r -r -r AUGUST Y rrrr r -r rrrrr YORK SELLING - -rte -- --------- CST OF GDS BE ------ 09/21/92 $3,230.00 KUETHER DIST._ CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $33.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI < *> $8,299.65* 130324 09/21/92 $2,366.38 KUNDE CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 092592 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $2,366.38* 130325 09/21/92 $740.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3761 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 3650 09/21/92 5354.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3765 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 3650 < *> $1,094.00* 130326 09/21/92 $126.00 LANCELLO, ED MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 092192 STREET REVOLVI MILEAGE <*> $126.00* 130327 09/21/92 $109.00 LANIER WORLDWIDE INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 02540676 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $109.00* 130328 09/21/92 $372.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1802836 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 3259 09/21/92 $457.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1802837 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 3260 09/21/92 $43.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1806781 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 3416 09/21/92 $43.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1806780 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 3415 OV/21/92 $46.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1807374 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3414 09/21/92 $457.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1807373 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 3414 < *> $1,422.29* 1 130329 09/21/92 $36.51 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 083192 MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $36.51* 130330 09/21/92 $1,547.24 LEITNER COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 090192 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 9292 < *> $1,547.24* 130331 09/21/92 $38.00 LIMBECK, MARC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 091492 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $38.00* 130332 09/21/92 $810.00 LINDENSELSER LANDFL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 082892 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $810.00* 130333 09/21/92 $22.16 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 212137 COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE 09/21/92 $6.75 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 212079 COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE < *> $28.91* 130334 09/21/92 $3,784.09 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 FINANCE DATA PROCESSI 09/21/92 $2,685.06 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 ASSESSING DATA PROCESSI 09/21/92 $2,808.08 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSI 09/21/92 $1.28 LOGIS DUE FROM HRA 89227 89 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 09/21/92 $333.13 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSI 09/21/92 $333.14 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 LIQUOR YORK GE DATA PROCESSI 09/21/92 $333.13 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 89227 89 VERNON LIQUOR DATA PROCESSI < *> $10,277.91* } 130335 09/21/92 $229.56 M & I IND SUPPLY SAFETY EQUIPMENT 08398 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPM 3483 < *> $229.56* 130336 09/21/92 $302.40 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 14899 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 12 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130336 09/21/92 $221.32 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 14979 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI - - - - -- 09/21/92 $410.62 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15062 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $340.76 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15136 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $454.24 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15154 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $417.16 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15199 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $2,146.50* 130337 09/21/92 $72.50 MAHA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 082892 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCR < *> $72.50* 130338 09/21/92 $100.00 MALMBERG, DAVID PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT 083192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 130339 09/21/92 $64.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $3,387.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $7,376.45 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $55.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $22.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $6,234.96 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $17,141.56* 130340 09/21/92 $296.71 MATSUSHITA SERVICE C GENERAL SUPPLIES 51147600 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3728 < *> $296.71* 130341 09/21/92 $89.60 MCCARTHY, LOWELL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 0910P2 WEED MOWING MILEAGE < *> $89.60* 130342 09/21/92 $103.05 MCGRAW HILL INC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS S2139494 PWKS ADMIN GEN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $103.05* 130343 09/21/92 $24.78 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 090192 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS < *> $24.78* 130344 09/21/92 $100.00 MERFELD -BERT PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130345 09/21/92 $474.45 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30839 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 3463 09/21/92 $495.00 MERIT SUPPLY ACCESSORIES 30859 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3486 09/21/92 $299.47 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 30872 PUMP & LIFT ST PAINT 3525 09/21/92 $127.80 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30945 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 3606 09/21/92 $495.22 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30959 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 3727 09/21/92 $267.04 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30955 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 3582 09/21/92 $494.16 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 31056 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPP 3878 < *> $2,653.14* 130346 09/21/92 $2,772.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL BUILDING PERMITS AUGUST GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERM < *> $2,772.00* 130347 09/21/92 $98.00 METZGER AQUATIC ENGI SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 147 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQU < *> $98.00* r 130348 09/21/92 $100.00 METZGER, JUDY RETAIL SALES 091592 ART CNTR PROG RETAIL SALES < *> $100.00* 130349 09/21/92 $329.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 080892 LAKES & PONDS PROF SERVICES 1429 a COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 13 CHECK# DATE -- - - - - -- — CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -- - - - - -------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. N 130349 ------------------------------ 09/21/92 $3,040.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE .................................... CONTRACTED REPAIRS 082792 AQUATIC WEEDS ........... CONTR REPAIRS 4. -- - - - - -- - 1540 < *> $3,369.00* 130350 09/21/92 $267.97 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1726 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $399.72 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1726 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $1,460.20 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 8240 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 09/21/92 $282.74 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 8240 PARKING LOTS BLACKTOP 09/21/92 $1,654.29 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 8240 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP <*> $4,064.92* 130351 09/21/92 $64.11 MIDWEST BADGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 97671 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 2392 < *> $64.11* 130352 09/21/92 $50.40 MIDWEST VENDING WHSL COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 071692 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 2276 09/21/92 $116.40 MIDWEST VENDING WHSL COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 081092 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 2276 < *> $166.80* 130353 09/21/92 $301.04 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQU REPAIR PARTS 2526 PONDS & LAKES REPAIR PARTS 3701 < *> $301.04* 130354 09/21/92 $18,111.00 MN DEPARTMENT OF REV DUE TO OTHER GOVERMEN 090192 UTILITY PROG DUE TO 0TH GO < *> $18,111.00* 130355 09/21/92 $846.00 MN DEPT OF GASOLINE AUGUST EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $846.00* 130356 09/21/92 $95.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36784 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $95.00* 130357 09/21/92 $139.02 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 6541 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 09/21/92 $56.28 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 6540 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 09/21/92 $1,946.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS PRINTING 082992 ADMINISTRATION PRINTING < *> 52,141.30* 130358 09/21/92 $655.54 MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 .598.50. MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 ::$314.46 MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $1,068.50* 130359 09/21/92 - $29.23 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 290608 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 09/21/92 $333.13 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 291155. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3489 09/21/92 $31.37 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 291967 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3568 09/21/92 $146.22 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 291966 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 3568 09/21/92 $15.90 MN. TORO INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 292791 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 3595 09/21/92 $31.48 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 293643 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 3660 09/21/92 $247.20 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 294088 GENERAL TURF C REPAIR PARTS 3703 09/21/92 $84.11 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 294553 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS < *> $860.18* 130361 09/21/92 $296.40 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151789 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $407.08 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151788 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $394.75 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151787 PUMP & LIFT ST CONCRETE 09/21/92 $394.75 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151786 GENERAL STORM CONCRETE 09/21/92 $444.09 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151785 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $296.06 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151784 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 14 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130361 09/21/92 $264.39 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151783 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE - - - - -- 09/21/92 $444.09 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151782 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $168.36 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151794 GENERAL STORM CONCRETE 09/21/92 $567.46 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151792 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $419.23 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151791 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $419.43 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151790 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 09/21/92 $143.69 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 151793 SIDEWALKS & PA CONCRETE 09/21/92 $1 011.55 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 153284 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 09/21/92 $296.06 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 153283 SIDEWALKS & PA CONCRETE 09/21/92 $188.03 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 153282 SIDEWALKS & PA CONCRETE < *> $6,155.42* 130362 09/21/92 $137.49 MOORE MEDICAL CORP FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7113603 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 3292 < *> $137.49* 130363 09/21/92 $45.00 MOTT, LUCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 311584 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 3785 < *> $45.00* 130364 09/21/92 $245.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30380 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3798 09/21/92 $735.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 030379 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $980.00* 130365 08/21/92 $149.10 NAME BRAND SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 5782 METER READING GENERAL SUPPL 3829 < *> $149.10* 130366 09/21/92 $13.93 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 830198 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3617. <*> $13.93* 130367 09/21/92 $516.17 NATIONAL CAR RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 07612622 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $516.17* 130368 09/21/92 $185.37 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 528118 50TH ST OCCUPA ALARM SERVICE 09/21/92 $494.99 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 527891 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $196.79 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 528117 VERNON OCCUPAN ALARM SERVICE < *> $877.15* 130369 09/21/92 $132.26 NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 107462 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD F00 9628 < *> $132.26* 130370 09/21/92 $127.20 NEW PIG CORPORATION BLUE PRINTING 510589 FIRE DEPT. GEN BLUE PRINTING 2376 < *> $127.20* 130371 09/21/92 $100.00 NISSEN DICK PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130372 09/21/92 $341.03 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 489470 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3513 09/21/92 $61.34 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 494790 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3661 < *> $402.37* 130373 09/21/92 $635.00 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC S GENERAL SUPPLIES 764848 METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPL 1348 < *> $635.00* f 130374 09/21/92 $440.52 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUG /YORK YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $310.32 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $489.60 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 15 CHECK* --------------- DATE - CHECK AMOUNT - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. * -1,240 44- - - - - -- -- 130375 09/21/92 $746.21 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES 083192 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES < *> $746.21* 130376 09/21/92 $28.06 NSP LIGHT & POWER 824 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 09/21/92 $60.02 NSP LIGHT & POWER 083192 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 09/21/92 $89.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 082892. DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 09/21/92 $106.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 091092 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 09/21/92 $7.03 NSP LIGHT & POWER 090992 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER < *> $290.57* 130377 09/21/92 $418.08 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 199190 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOO 3506 < *> $418.08' 130378 09/21/92 $45.00 NYSTROM, JUDD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 311587 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 3788 < *> $45.00* 130379 09/21/92 $1,239.01 OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 175591 ASSESSING EQUIP REPLACE 3576 < *> $1,239.01* 130380 09/21/92 $369.56 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 32430 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 3501 09/21/92 $174.69 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 32445 POLICE DEPT. 0 PRINTING 09/21/92 $425.25 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 32458 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 3512 < *> $969.50* 130381 09/21/92 $238.40 OLD DUTCH FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 082892 GRILL CST OF GD FOO < *> $238.40* 130382 09/21/92 $374.63 ORR SCHELEN MAYERON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 081292 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES < *> $374.63* 130383 09/21/92 $111.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 9069 CLUB HOUSE CST OF GD F00 9041 < *> $111.00* 130384 09/21/92 $37.17 PARAGON CABLE MPLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 091492 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCR < *> $37.17* 130385 09/21/92 $5.0.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 080592 POLICE DEPT. G PHYS EXAMS 09/21/92 $50.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 081992 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHYS EXAMS 09/21/92 $50.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 082692 POLICE DEPT. G PHYS EXAMS < *> $150.00* 130386 09/21/92 $21.76 PARTS SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 970 -3257 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 3657 < *> $21.76* 130387 09/21/92 $27.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26144 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $27.50* 130388 09/21/92 $19.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 083192 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD F00 09/21/92 $1,470.30 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 083192 GRILL CST OF GD F00 09/21/92 $194.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $1,683.30* 130389 09/21/92 $1,715.21 PERA PENSIONS 090392 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 16 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $1,715.21* 130390 09/21/92 $19.62 PERA PENSIONS 091692 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS < *> $19.62* 130391 09/21/92 $75.00 PETERSON, DALE SERVICES /ART CENTER 091192 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 130392 09/21/92 $20.00 PETERSON, JENNIFER SERVICES CL /EB 083092 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $20.00* 130393 09/21/92 $477.50 PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA GENERAL SUPPLIES 1198 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 3836 < *> $477.50* 130394 09/21/92 $405.18 PLANT & FLANGED EQU GENERAL SUPPLIES 3214 METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPL 3718 < *> $405.18* 130395 09/21/92 $50.00 PODNIEKS, ERIC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 090292 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOL < *> $50.00* 130396 09/21/92 $215.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 090392 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $215.00* 130397 09/21/92 $2,632.00 POSTMASTER MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E ACCT 393 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET E < *> $2,632.00* 1 130398 09/21/92 $2,396.25 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 112 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 3653 < *> $2,396 25* 130399 09/21/92 $129.00 PRIME LEARNING INTER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 331103 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL 2391 <*> $129.00* 130400 09/21/92 $108.00 PRINTERS SERV INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 76755 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT < *> $108.00* 130401 09/21/92 $194.64 PRIOR LAKE AGG. CONCRETE 15757 -68 GENERAL MAINT CONCRETE < *> $194.64* 130402 09/21/92 $3.63 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 606132 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $3.63* 130403 09/21/92 $33,526.45 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS P -3 PARKING /RAMP CIP < *> $33,526.45* 130404 09/21/92 $113.97 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 045008 ADMINISTRATION PRINTING 3865 < *> $113.97* 130405 09/21/92 $36.90 R &R SPECIALTIES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 016690 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3758 < *> $36.90* 130406 09/21/92 $119.85 RED WING SHOES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 287569 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY'EQUIPM 09/21/92 $182.75 RED WING SHOES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 287569 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 09/21/92 $99.45 RED WING SHOES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 287569 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $402.05* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 17 CHECK# --- - - DATE - - -- ------ CHECK AMOUNT - - - - -- -- --------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # 130407 09/21/92 $29.77 REGAN, JUNE - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL SUPPLIES 091092 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPL < *> $29.77* 130408 09/21/92 $358.10 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 01830 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3839 <*> $358.10* 130409 09/21/92 $5,511.17 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $18.15 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $7,850.06 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $130.30 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $146.40 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $5,436.75 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $19,092.83* 130410 09/21/92 $85.00 RICHARDS, BRIAN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT 083192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 130411 09/21/92 $17.58 RINGS & THINGS COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 108402 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOO < *> $17.58* 130412 09/21/92 $400.00 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 49860 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3770 < *> $400.00* 130413 09/21/92 $925.10 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 1612 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 9379 < *> $925.10* 130414 09/21/92 $75.00 ROZYCKI, NANCY PERFORM 10/29/92 EB 083192 ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 130415 09/21/92 $202.17 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON REPAIR PARTS 70686 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3412 ( *> $202.17* 130416 09/21/92 518.50 SANKEY, DIANE LICENSES & PERMITS 091492 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 09/21/92 $10.28 SANKEY, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 091492 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $7.43 SANKEY, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 091492 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL < *> $36.21* 130417 09/21/92 $30.00 SANKEY, MOREAU J CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 091092 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOL < *> $30.00* 130418 09/21/92 $123.36 SCAN AIR FILTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 36619 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL 3684 < *> $123.36* 130419 09/21/92 $129.00 SCHMITT MUSIC MUSIC SUPPLIES 931224 SPECIAL ACTIVI MUSIC SUPPLIE 3900 < *> $129.00* 130420 09/21/92 $331.88 SEELYE PLASTICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 227807 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 3131 09/21/92 $73.39 SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 229747 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 3612 09/21/92 $23.48 SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 230057 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 3635 < *> $428.75* 130421 09/21/92 $4,617.48 SEH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14785 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $4,617.48* 130422 09/21/92 $100.00 SHEPARD JOHN PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 18 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $100.00* 130423 09/21/92 $28.04 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 0951 -7 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 3240 09/21/92 $44.64 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1064 -8 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPL 3325 09/21/92 $45.09 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 1235 -4 PUMP & LIFT ST PAINT 3340 09/21/92 $79.48 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1472 -3 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 3627 09/21/92 $17.01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1728 -8 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 3477 09/21/92 $104.30 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1881 -5 BRIDGES GUARD GENERAL SUPPL 3528 < *> $318.56* 130424 09/21/92 $275.73 SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 127015 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTH 3289 09/21/92 $114.27 SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 127181 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 3290 < *> $390.00* 130425 09/21/92 $36.00 SMIEJA, GARY CONTRACTED REPAIRS 090992 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $36.00* 130426 09/21/92 $13,310.15 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $164.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $96.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $3,964.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST 5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE < *> $17,536.35* 130427 09/21/92 $59.02 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1925695 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 3613 09/21/92 $49.12 SPS REPAIR PARTS 1927614 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3646 < *> $108.14* 130428 09/21/92 $194.60 ST CROIX RECREATION REPAIR PARTS 8465 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3909 < *> $194.60* 130429 09/21/92 $1,145.70 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 083192 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSON < *> $1,145.70* 130430 09/21/92 $94.60 STATE OF MINNESOTA PROFESS SERVICES -ENGI 69 -3100- ADMINISTRATION PRO SVC ENGIN < *> $94.60* 130431 09/21/92 $14.02 STERLING DRUG STORES GENERAL SUPPLIES 083192 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $14.02* 130432 09/21/92 $1,238.99 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 09/21/92 $837.39 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 6 ST. IMPROV BA CIP < *> $2,076.38* 130433 09/21/92 $359.32 STS CONSULTANT LTD CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 06 -24944 STREET IMPROV. CIP < *> $359.32* 130434 09/21/92 $28.36 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 172516 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $28.36* 130435 09/21/92 $1,875.00 SUBURBAN RATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 083192 SUB.RATE AUTH. PROF SERVICES <*> $1,875.00* 130436 09/21/92 $34.37 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 0144318 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $34.37* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 38 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P:.O. A - -- - - - - -- -=--------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- 4.....--- _ - = - - - =. 130437 09/21/92 $102.00 SUSAN FRAME PT OFFICE //ART CENTER 091592 ADMINISTRATION SALARIES TEMP 09/21/92 $200.00 SUSAN FRAME COST OF COMM/ART CENT 091592 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 < *> $302.00* 130438 09/21/92 $100.00 SWANSON HAROLD PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130439 09/21/92 $75.00 SWEENEY, VIRGINIA RENTAL INCOME 082892 EDINB /CL PROG RENTAL INCOME < *> $75.00* 130440 09/21/92 $217.77 SYSCO MN CLEANING SUPPLIES 090192 GRILL CLEANING SUPP 09/21/92 $3,089.51 SYSCO MN COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 090192 GRILL CST OF GD F00 09/21/92 $320.24 SYSCO MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 090192 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL <*> $3,627.52* 130441 09/21/92 $6.76 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 083092 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $29.05 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 090292 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPL < *> $35.81* 130442 09/21/92 $479.25 TERRY ANN SALES CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 090992 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 3588 < "> $479.25* 130443 09/21/92 $155.40 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4237275 BUILDING & GRO PROF SERVICES 3842 < *> $155.40* 130444 09/21/92 $245.96 THE MATHISON CO 07414588 7375b6 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 3774 < "> $245.96* 130445 09/21/92 $484.00 THE PRINT SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19707 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 3447 < *> $484.00* 130446 09/21/92 $283.50 THERMAL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 2081774 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPL 3608 < *> $283.50* 130447 09/21/92 $13,176.63 THOMSEN- NYBECK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64050 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $13,176.63* 130448 09/21/92 $9,956.70 THORPE DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 09/21/92 $272.50 THORPE DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $10,229.20* 130449 09/21/92 $1,232.00 TMI COATING INC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS JUNE POOL CIP CIP < *> $1,232.00* 130450 09/21/92 $190.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 090192 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS < *> $190.00* 130451 09/21/92 $42.48 TOLL COMPANY TOOLS 191369 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 3326 < *> $42.48* 130452 09/21/92 $123.54 TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 46155 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL' SUPPL 3665 < *> $123.54* 130453 09/21/92 $224.00 TOWER TEE PRODUCTS RANGE BALLS 3742 RANGE RANGE BALLS 3867 <*> $224.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 20 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130454 09/21/92 $230.05 TRAPSKIN, JAMES M PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 080892 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $230.05* 130455 09/21/92 $89.46 TURF SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 038649 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 2131 < *> $89.46* 130456 09/21/92 $13.98 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 09/21/92 $28.94 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI AUGUST /V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $42.92* 130457 09/21/92 $70.00 TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY CONTRACTED REPAIRS 09137 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 3846 < *> $70.00* 130458 09/21/92 $100.00 ULTAN, ROSLYE SERVICES /ART CENTER 091192 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130459 09/21/92 $65.62 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 14874400 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 3464 09/21/92 $59.21 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19043300 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 3527 09/21/92 $255.92 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19644500 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 3583 < *> $380.75* 130460 09/21/92 $10.70 UNITED WAY MINNEAPOL GENERAL SUPPLIES S4686 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $10.70* 130461 09/21/92 $26.04 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 0901 2 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $66.46 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 0901 2 BUILDING & GRO TELEPHONE < *> $92.50* 130463 09/21/92 $235.00 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE SEPT GENERAL STORM TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $52.43 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 DARE TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $118.49 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $3,801.96 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $170.73 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $110.71 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $17.30 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $533.03 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $61.60 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $114.75 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $274.99 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $54.60 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $226.65 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $587.53 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $16.06 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $17.18 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 09/21/92 $134.96 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 092192 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $6,527.97* 130464 09/21/92 $114.88 VAN NOSTRAND REINHOL BLUE PRINTING 5770193 FIRE DEPT. GEN BLUE PRINTING 3302 < *> $114.88* 130465 09/21/92 $492.78 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 426773 CITY HALL GENE PAPER 6UPPLIE 3855 < *> $492.78* 130466 09/21/92 $660.18 VANTAGE ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1111 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 3651 < *> 5660.18* t COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 21 CHECKS DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR r DESCRIPTION INVOICE i...............• PROGRAM OBJECT. P.O. • 130467 --- rrrr r...... 09/21/92 .$65 32 .... r........r... ....................... VENDOR'S SUPPLY & SE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 361372 rr. rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ARENA CONCESSI .rrrrr��rr�urr.rrrrr�r CONTR REPAIRS 3778 < *> $65.32* 130468 09/21/92 $288.88 VOTER REG /ELEC SECT POSTAGE 5/5 -9/1 ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE < *> $288.88* 130469 09/21/92 $469.96 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 495 -2613 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3425 09/21/92 $13.76 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 495 -2654 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3540 09/21/92 $57.58 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6546 PUMP & LIFT:ST GENERAL SUPPL 3455 09/21/92 $10.21 W.W. GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 270051 -8 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $551.51* 130470 09/21/92 $29.50 WAKNITZ, CINDY GENERAL SUPPLIES 090492 BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $29.50* 130471 09/21/92 $304.50 WALKER PARKING CONSU CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 66884 PARKING /RAMP CIP < *> $304.50* 130472 09/21/92 $100.00 WALSH WILLIAM PIRSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130473 09/21/92 $335.76 WARNER IND SUPPLY TOOLS 1010054- PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 3544 < *> $335.76* 130474 09/21/92 $8.82 WENDELL'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 6450,1 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPL 09/21/92 $21.19 WENDELL'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 64824 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPL < *> 530.01* 130475 09/21/92 $237.50 WENDY ANDERSON ENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 083192 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES 09/21/92 $285.00 WENDY ANDERSON ENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 090992 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $522.50* 130476 09/21/92 $45.00 WERT, CAPRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 311583 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 3011 09/21/92 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 311588 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 3786 09/21/92 $135.00 WERT, CAPRICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 311586 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 3787 < *> $270.00* 130477 09/21/92 $108.90 WEST PHOTO PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 78195 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIE 3771 < *> $108.90* 130478 09/21/92 $991.56 WHEELER LUMBER SHARED MAINTENANCE 000384 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 3183 < *> $991.56* 130479 09/21/92 $480.00 WICKER, CYD AC INSTRUCTOR 091592 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $480.00* 130480 09/21/92 $262.67 WILLIAMS STEEL ACCESSORIES 434263 -0 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3410 < *> $262.67* 130481 09/21/92 $62.00 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 66063 RANGE REPAIR,PARTS 3280 < *> $62.00* 130482 09/21/92 $168.00 WORLD CLASS WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 11689 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $168.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:28 PM page 22 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 130483 09/21/92 $45.82* WRIGHT LINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 3062973 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPL 130484 09/21/92 $100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY PERSONAL SERVICES OCTOBER RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 130485 09/21/92 $174.48* XEROX CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 14766681 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL 3499 130486 09/21/92 $3,025.00 ZAHNER CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R -92 -2 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $3,025.00* 130487 09/21/92 $75.65 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 54260871 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 3073 < *> $75.65* $1,163,767.91* 0 0 I` • COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, SEP 16, 1992, 9:42 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 $706,012.96 FUND # 11 $3,025.00 FUND # 12 $2,949.79 FUND # 15 $3,932.60 FUND # 23 $4,778.40 FUND # 26 $1,932.70 FUND # 27 $53,579.80 FUND # 28 $3,846.06 FUND # 29 $136.33 FUND # 30 $11,675.95 FUND # 40 $45,268.29 FUND # 41 $3,113.87 FUND # 50 $108,789.12 FUND # 60 $214,191.24 FUND # 66 $535.80 $1,163,767.91- COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM AUGUST HANDWRITTEN CHECKS page 1 CHECKS DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123192 08/03/92 $36.21 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR FERTILIZER 502310 MAINT OF COURS PLANT & TREES 08/03/92 $72.42 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR MULCH FOR PLANT 502843 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT < ■> $108.63" 123197 08/03/92 $2,824.20 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE 080392 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI <�> $2,824.20- 123198 08/03/92 $1,807.19 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 080392 CENT SVC GENER LNG TRM DISAB <•> $1,807.19" 123199 08/03/92 $19,180.60 FIDELITY BANK FICA 080392 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB 08/03/92 $5;053.33 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 080392 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB < -> $24,233.93- 123200 08/03/92 $28,892.93 PERA PERA 080392 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS <�> $28,892.93* 123201 08/03/92 $19.62 PERA PERA 080392 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS <•> $19.62" 123210 09/03/92 $342.27 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 593687 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 /03/92 -$3.42 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 593687 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 0 /03/92 $645.69 EAGLE WINE L119920817 594075 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.46 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 594075 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,222.17 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 594077 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $12.22 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 594077 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $100.45 EAGLE WINE L119920817 594109 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.00 EAGLE WINE L119920817 594109 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $63.55 EAGLE WINE L119920817 594110 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.64 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 594110 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LID903 09/03/92 $63.55 EAGLE WINE. LI19920817 594111 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92. -$0.64 EAGLE WINE L119920817 594111 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $76.38 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 66245 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.53 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 65245 YORK SELLING. CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $12.00 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 66349 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUN LI0903 09/03/92 - $47.00 EAGLE WINE L119920817 66349 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $0.47 EAGLE WINE LI19920817 66506 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <•> $2,279.92- 123211 09/03/92 $84.30 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 20626 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $212.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 22004 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LIC903 09/03/92 -$4.26 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920817 22004 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT L10903. 09/03/92 $249.30 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21913 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $80.10 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21914 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $114.74 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21915 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.29 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920817 21915 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $919.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 22005 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $510.19 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21922 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ L10903 09/03/92 - $10.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21922 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $67.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21718 YORK SELLING CST OF'.GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $487.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21630 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $1,518.71 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21940 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $30.37 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21940 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $603.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 22009 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $768.10 _ ED.PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21921 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 2 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT. P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123211 09/03./92 $210.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 20679 VERNON SELLING CST OF-GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $809.40 ED PHILLIPS'& SONS LI19920817 22045 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$16.19 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 22045 VERNON. SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $719.10 ED PHILLIPS .& SONS LI19920817 21644 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 .$781.48 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 22010, VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $85.79 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21951 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.72 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21951 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $872.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920817 21950 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 <*> $9,030.93" 123212 09/03/92 $5,315.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591793 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $106.31 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591793 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,386.74 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591794 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $67.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591794 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/9,2 $4,162.98 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591795 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $83.26 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 591795 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $79.53 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 592356 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.59_ GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 592356 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,814.29 GRIGGS COOPER.& CO. LI19920817 594255 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $56.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594255 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,560.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594256 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ.LI0903 0 -$31.21 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594256 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 0/03/92 /03/92 $7;188.35 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594257 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $143.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594257 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,441.23 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594258 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $68.82 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1I19920817 594258 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $97.46 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594276 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 594276 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $235.90 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 66337 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUN LI0903 09/03/92 - $117.95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 66338 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUN LI0903 09/03/92 - $235.90 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920817 66339 YORK SELLING TRADE.DISCOUN LI0903 . < ■> $26,895.71" 123213 09/03/92 $265.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566276 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $5.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566276 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $2.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566276 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $325.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566243 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566243 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN 'I0903 09/03/92 -$3.27 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566243 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $92.26 JOHNSON WINE CO : LI19920818 7566268 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566268 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 -$0.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566268 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,366.92 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566250 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $8.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566250 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $27.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566250 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $43.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7536543 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903. 09/03/92 - $10.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7535552 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LID903 09/03/92 - $120.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7536550 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $7,513.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566680 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $41.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566680 YORK SELLING CST OF,GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $150.27 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566680 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $709.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566698 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $12.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566698 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$7.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566698 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $420.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566672 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 3 CHECK# -----=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. N 123213 09/03/92 $13.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566672 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566672 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $149.65. JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566656 YORK SELLING - CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566656 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566656 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $850.15 JOHNSON WINE CO.. LI19920818 756664 YORK:SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 756664 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 756664 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $515.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566227 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $10.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566227 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$5.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566227 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $278.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566185 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566185 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566185 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $443.84 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566193 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566193 VERNON SELLING CST OF-GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566193 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $123.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566219 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566219 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LID903 09/03/92 -$1.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566219 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,097.68 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566201 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 Q9/03/92 $16.56 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566201 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $61.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7566201 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $61.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 1451848 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.84 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920818 7521.115 VERNON SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 < *> $15,765.69* 123214 09/03/92 $119.80 PAUSTIS & SONS LI10920818 25333 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920818 25333 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $135.90 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920818 25455 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920818 25455 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $102.95 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920818 25457 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920818 25457 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < *> $368.65* 123215 09/03/92 $180.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 592438 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY L119920818 592438 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $345..04 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818. 593643 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.45 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 593643 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $495.95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 593645 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.96 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 593645 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $40.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 594196 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 594196 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $900.80 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 594251 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$9.01 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920818 594251 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <•> $1,943.01* 123216 09/03/92 $532.43 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015426 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $10.65 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015426 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,556.12 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015427 YORK SELLING CST OF,,GD LIQ L10903 09/03/92 -$71.12 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015427 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,112.17 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015429 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $62.24 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015429 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $64.75 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015431 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.65 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015431 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 4 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT . VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - -- OBJECT- ----------------- P.O. # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 123216 09/03/92 $1,166.04 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015538 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN.LI0903 09/03/92 - $11.66 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015538 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,008.18 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015557 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $20.08 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015557 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,311.37 QUALITY WINE L119920818 015569 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$13.11 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015569 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $277.10 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 015866 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.77 QUALITY WINE LI19920818_ 015866 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $120.00 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 012732 VERNON SELLING.CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.20 QUALITY WINE LI19920818 012732 VERNON.SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $11,717.08* 123217 08/17/92 $380.00 COURTNEY, C WAYNE SERVICES AUGUST ADMINISTRATION PROF.SERVICES <*> $380.00* 123218 08/17/92 $250.00 MADSON,JOHN SERVICES AUGUST ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $250.00" 123219 08/14/92 - $94,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 081492 LIQUOR PROG CASH 08/14/92 $94,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 081492 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00" 123220 0*8/17/92 $18,480.12 FIDELITY BANK FICA 081792 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB 08/17/92 $4,847.69 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 081792 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB < *> $23,327.81* 123221 08/17/92 $19.62 PERA PERA 081792 CENT SVC GENER.PENSIONS < *> $19.62* 123222 08/17/92 $28,641.36 PERA PERA 081792 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS < *> $28,641.36* 123223 09/03/92 $63.55 EAGLE WINE L119920821 596096 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.64 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 596096 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $333.10 EAGLE WINE L119920821 5960697 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.33 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 5960697 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $677.40 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 596175 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.77 EAGLE WINE L119920821 596175 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $407.40 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 596177 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 -$4.07 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 596177 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $291.65 EAGLE WINE L119920821 596178 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LID903. 09/03/92 -$2.92 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 596178 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $86.00 EAGLE WINE L11.9920821 597335 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92' =$0.86 EAGLE.WINE LI19920821 597335 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $214.00 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 597336 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LIC903 09/03/92 -$2.14 EAGLE WINE LI19920821 597336 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $2,052.37* 123.224 09/03/92 $319.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 19164 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $93.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23664 YORK SELLING. CST OF.GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $443.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23890 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1,191.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23841 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $173.21 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23663 YORK SELLING CST OF GD'LIQ L10903 09/03/92 -$3.46 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920821 23663 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 4508.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920821 23840 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # page 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123224 09/03/92 - 510.18 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23840 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $782.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23725 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1,030.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920821 23728 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $580.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23726 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1,253.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23939 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $58.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23940 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.16 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23940 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LIC903 09/03/92 $710.87 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23938 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $14.22 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821. 23938 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $676.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23829 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903. 09/03/92 $176.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23660 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $58.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 24498 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $190.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23659 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $468.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23828 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$9.38 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920821 23828 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $8,678.68* 123225 09/03/92 $4,282.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920821 596758 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $85.65 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 596758 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $88.26 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 596759 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 596759 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 0q/03/92 $3,988.01 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 596761 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $79.76 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920821 596761 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $474.64 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 597432 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD L10903 09/03/92 -$9.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920821 597432 VERNON SELLING CASH .LIQ DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $64.94 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 597940 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -51.30 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 597940 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $745.23 GRIGGS COOPER & C0: L119920821 596760 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $14.90 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 596760 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $829.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920821 598024 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $16.59 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 598024 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < ■> $10,263.37* 123226 09/03/92 $466.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594468 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $5.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594468 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.68 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594468 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $214.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594500 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $6.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594500 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.13 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594500 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $137.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594450 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594450 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.38 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594450 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $59.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594476 50TH ST SELLIN CST-OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $1.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594476 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594476 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $582.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594484 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $2.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594484 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $11.65 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594484 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $190.00 - JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594518 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594518 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF',GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594518 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $34.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594492 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $0.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594492 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594492 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 .$772.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594583 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 6 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123226.09/03/92 $15.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594583 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$7.73 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594583 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,715.28 JOHNSON WINE CO.. LI19920821 7594559 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $8.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594559 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $34.31 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594559 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $189.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594542 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594542 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594542 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $95.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594534 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $1.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594534 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LIC903 09/03/92 -50:96 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594534 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,227.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594526 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92. $10.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594526 YORK SELLING CST OF.GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $24.53 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594526 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 , 09/03/92 $444:99 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594575 YORK SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $12.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594575 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.46 JOHNSON WINE. CO. LI19920821 7594575 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,195.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594567 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $10.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594567 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 - $11.96 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594567 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $4,811.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594419 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 0$/03/92 $24.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594419 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $96.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594419 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $459.72 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594385 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594385 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.61 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594385 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $416.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594393 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92- $4.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 75943.93 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 -$4.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594393 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $409.06 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594443 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594443 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. LIIS920821 7594443 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT.LID903 09/03/92 $210.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594435 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 . 09/03/92 $5.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594435 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.10 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920821 7594435 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,123.24 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594401 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $13.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594401 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $42.47 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7594401 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.24 JOHNSON WINE CO: LI19920821 7564297 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $64.28 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7605405 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920821 7605405 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $15,690.20* 123227 09/03/92 $753.84 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595980 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$7.54 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595980 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $721.64 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595981 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$7.22 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595981 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $40.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595994 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595994 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $40.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595995 VERNON SELLING CST OF10D WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 595995 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $683.59 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 596058 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$7.11 PRIOR WINE COMPANY L119920821 596058 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 66798 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ L10903 09/03/92 $0.08 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 66799 YORK SELLIN G CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 7 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123227 09/03/92 -$8.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 66800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $0.08 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920821 66800 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <*> $2,200.44* 123228 09/03/92 $634.45 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016597 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ L20903 09/03/92 - $12.69 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016597 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,154.87 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016598 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $23.10 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016598 YORK SELLING CASH,DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $686.85 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016815 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -56.87 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016815 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,622.05 QUALITY LI19920821 016825 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - 416.22 .WINE QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016825 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92' $32.64 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016953 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.33 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016953 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $777.20 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017082 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $15.54 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017082 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $310.88 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017083 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.22 QUALITY WINE L•I19920821 037083 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,464.98 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017274 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $29.30 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017274 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,147.14 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017339 YORK SELLING CST OF GO LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $42.94 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017339 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $3,914.82 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017343 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $78.30 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017343 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,497.09 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016799 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $14.97 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016799 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 51,165.80 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017081 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $23.32 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017081 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $93.90 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017344 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.94 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017344 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $5,055.85 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016599 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $101.12 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 016599 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,092.48 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017762 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $21.85 QUALITY WINE LI19920821 017762 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $36.00. QUALITY WINE CREDIT 2333 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT 09/03/92. $0.36 QUALITY WINE 016482 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN <*> $21,221.65* 123229 09/03/92 $304.00 SALUD AMERICA LI19920821 2916 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.55 SALUD AMERICA LI19920821 2916 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 <*> $306.55* 123230 09/03/92 $547.00 THE WINE COMPANY LI19920821 1920 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.50 THE WINE COMPANY LI19920821 1920 VERNON SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 < *> $551.50* 123231 09/03/92 $70.00 WINE MERCHANTS LI19920821 3041 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 WINE, MERCHANTS LI19920821 3041 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < *> $73.00* 123233 09/03/92 $67.80 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598537 50TH ST SELLIN S CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.68 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598537 50TH.ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $166.55 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598538 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.67 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598538 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $404.04 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598579 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 8 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123233 09/03/92 -$4.04 EAGLE WINE L119920826 ----------------------------------------------- 598579 .50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $675.84 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598581 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.76 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 598581 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $33.90 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 599229 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.34 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 599229 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $689.67 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 599329 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.90 EAGLE WINE L119920826 599329 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $188.00 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 67122 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.88 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 67122 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.33 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 66788 50TH ST SELLIN CST.OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $0.04 EAGLE WINE LI19920826 66788 50TH ST SELLIN-CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <•> $1,827.00" 123234 09/03/92 $535.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25945 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $718.41 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25944 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$14.37 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25944 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $325.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26012 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $213.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS. LI19920826 25870 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $.737.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25875 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $180.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26013 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 0Q/03/92 -$3.61 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26013 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $110.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920826 25908 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25908 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $737.96 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920826 2595Q YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ L10903 09/03/92 - $14.76 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25950 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $908.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920826 25732 YORK SELLING CST. OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $286.76 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $5.66 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $286.76 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $5._66 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $282.96 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $3.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$5.66 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26586 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $312.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 26014 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $31.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25976 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LID903 09/03/92 $899.32 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25975 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $17.99 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25975 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $527:80 ED PHILLIPS& SONS LI19920826 25911 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $99.7.70 ED PHILLIPS& SONS 1119920826 25819 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $728.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920826 25622 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < ■> $8,193.21" 123235 09/03/92 $111.70 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 597941 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ L10903 09/03/92 -$2.23 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 597941 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $156.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920821 598347 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.13 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 598347 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $39.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 598348 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LID903 09/03/92 -$0.78 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 59.8348 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $156.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920827 598349 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.13 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920827 598349 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $3,167.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920827. 599305 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LID903 09/03/92 -$63.35 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599305 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $4,031.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599306 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $80.63 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599306 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $4,587.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920827 599307 YORK.SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 9 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123235 09/03/92 - $91.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599307 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT - - - - -- LI0903 09/03/92 $460.35 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599963 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$9.21 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599963 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $305.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 600415 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -56.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 600415 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $4,587.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599307 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $91.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599307. YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $4,587.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599307 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $91.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920827 599307 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <�> $12,755.41• 123236 09/03/92 $177.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621659 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621659 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -51.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621659 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $248.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621618. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621618 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.49 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621618 50TH ST SELLIN CASH .DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $101.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621642 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621642 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621.642 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,638.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621634 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 0,9/03/92 $9.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621634 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $32.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621634 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,603.28 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621626 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $11.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621626 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $32.06 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621626 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $435.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7630957 VERNON SELLING CST OF GO LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.71 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7630957 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 4273.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621592 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621592. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LID903 09/03/92 -$2.72 JOHNSON WINE.CO. LI19920827 7621592 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $438.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621600 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621600 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621600 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $211.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621568 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621568 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621568 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LID903 09/03/92 $107.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621550 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621550 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621550 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,333.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621576 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $10.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621576 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $26.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621576 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,873.27 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621584 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $15.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621584 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $57.48 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621584 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903. 09/03/92 $5.,316.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621709 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $25.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621709 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $106.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621709 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $272.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621725 YORK SELLING CST OF',GD WIN LI0903. 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621725 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.72 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621725 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $337.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621741 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $7.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 .7821741 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 =33.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621741 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 . COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 10 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123236 09/03/92 $1,527.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621691 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621691 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $30.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621691 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $457.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621683 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $5.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621683 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621683 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $30.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7593148 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $196.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621667 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $0.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI1992082.7 7621667 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621687 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $47.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621675 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $0.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621675 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.48 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621675 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $147.95 - JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920827 7621717 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $2.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621717 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.96 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621717 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $80.04 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621733 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.00 JOHNSON WINE CO.. L119920827 7621733 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 7621733 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT.LI0903 09/03/92 - $12.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920827 X7454289 50TH .ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < *> $17,587.76* 123237 09/03/92 $127.00 PAUSTIS & SONS L119920827 25712 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920827 25712 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $316.90 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920827 25733 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920827 25733 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $181.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920827 25735 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 $3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS LI19920827 25735 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < *> $635.90* 123238 09/03/92 $40.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 598527 YORK.SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $0.40. PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 598527 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $509.86 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 598563 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$5.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 598563 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903. 09/03/92 $574.59 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 599315 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$5.75 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 599315 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $176.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 599317 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN L10903 09/03/92 -$1.76 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920827 599317 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <A> $1,287.54* 123239 09/03/92 $387.94 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 018783 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.88 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 018783 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,471.56 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019322 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $29.43 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019322 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,349.51 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019323 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 = $46.99 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019323 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,559.90 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019338 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 451.20 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019338 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $268.02 QUALITY WINE LI19.920827 019436 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$5.38 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019436 YORK SELLING, CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $90.98 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019341 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.91 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019341 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,291.87 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019362 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $12.92 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019362 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $2,272..95 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019365 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD.WIN LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 11 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123239 09/03/92 - $22.73 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019365 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LID903 09/03/92 $1,305.97 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019368 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $13.06 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 019368 50TH ST.SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $42.95 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 018095 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $0.43 QUALITY WINE LI19920827 018095 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 <�> $11,769.70' 123240 08/28/92 $55,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 082892 LIQUOR PROG CASH 08/28/92 - $55,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLLTRANSFER 082892 LIQUOR PROG CASH < ■) $0.00 "' 123242 08/28/92 $433 -.50 COMM LIFE INS CO. LIFE INSURANCE 082892 CENT SVC GENER LIFE INSURANC 08/28/92 $433.35 COMM LIFE INS CO. LIFE INSURANCE 082892 CENT SVC GENER LIFE INSURANC 08/28/92 $245.93 COMM LIFE INS CO. ADJUSTMENT 082892 CENT SVC GENER LIFE INSURANC <•> $1,112.78" 123243 08/31/92 $28,495.58 PERA PERA 083192. CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS 08/31/92 $19.62 PERA PERA 083192 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS <�> $28,515.20" 129545 08/31/92 $23,078.31 FIDELITY BANK FICA /MEDICARE 083192 GENERAL-FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB < ■> $23,078.31" 129546 09/03/92 $33.90 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601583 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.34 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601583 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $235.65 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601584 - VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.36 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601584 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LID903 09/03/92 $33.90 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601585 YORK SELLING CST.OF GD WIN 'LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.34 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601585 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $749.05 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601627 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $7.49 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601627 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $677.70 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601645 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$6.78 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601645 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $819.70 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601647 YORK SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.20 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 601647 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $64.94 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 67248 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $1.30 EAGLE WINE LI19920902 67248 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < -k > $2,460.75" 129547 09/03/92 $33.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28191 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $91.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28084 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.82 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28084 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $114.74 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28190 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.29 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28190 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $425.21 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28065 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28065 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $582.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28113 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $189.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 27863 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $656.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28085 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $603.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28004 YORK SELLING CST OF!.GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $720.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 27927 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $947.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28068 YORK SELLING CST OF GO LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $18.96 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28068 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $85.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28115 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28115 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 12 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 129547 09/03/92 $260.05 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28005 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $684.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS L119920902 27886 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $180.36 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28123 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.61 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28123 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $479.31 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28093 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03192 -$9.59 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28093 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,305.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 27961 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $724.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28028 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $112.69 ED PHILLIPS& SONS LI1.9920902 28828, VERNON SELLING CST OF GD.LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $2.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LI19920902 28828 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $8,147.59* 129548 09/03/92 $3,988.57 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601834 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $79.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO: LI19920902 601834 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $643.48 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601835 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $12.87 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601835 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,193.57 GRIGGS COOPER & CO., LI19920902 601836 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $23.87 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601836 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $5,308.19 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601837 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $106.16 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 601837 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $232.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. L119920902 602515 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.65 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. LI19920902 602515 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $11,139.05* 129549 09/03/92 $88.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650286 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650286 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.88 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650286 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $189.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650294 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650294 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LIC903 09/03/92 -$1.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650294 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,844.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650278 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $10.50 JOHNSON.WINE CO. LI19920902 7650278 50TH ST .SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $36.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650278 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $406.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650260 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.00 JOHNSON WINE.CO. LI19920902 7650260 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.07 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650260 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $465.38 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650310 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $4.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650310 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.65 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650310 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $251.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650336 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $8.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650336 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$2.51 JOHNSON'WINE CO. LI19920902 7650336 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,099.86 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650328 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 $6.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650328 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$22.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650328 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $819.25 JOHNSON, WINE CO. LI19920902 7650344 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903. 09/03/92 $15.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650344 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920902 7650344 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $72.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7660772 YORK SELLING CST OF.GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$1.46 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7660772 YORK SELLING" CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $34.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650229 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $0.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650229 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650229 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT L10903 09/03/92 $189.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. L119920902 7650237 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 . 09/03/92 $5.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650237, VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 COUNCIL-CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:31 PM page 13 CHECK* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. t 129549. 09/03/92 -$1.88 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650237 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $357.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650245 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $7.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650245 VERNON SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.56 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650245 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $5,133.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650211 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 $28.96 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650211 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 .09/03/92 09/03/92 - $102.70 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650211• VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $478.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $6.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$4.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19920902 7650203 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $11,339.11* 129550 09/03/92 $339.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601249 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$3.39 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601249 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $833.81 PRIOR WINE.COMPANY LI19920902 601256 YORK SELLING CST OF GO LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.34 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601256 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $825.32 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601257 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$8.25 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601257 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $34.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601687 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$0.34 PRIOR WINE COMPANY LI19920902 601687 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $2,012.21* 129551 09/03/92 $2,274.04 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020736 YORK SELLING CST OF GO WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $22.74 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020736 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92, $1,495.04 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 0207'43 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 - $14.95 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020743 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,029.61 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020969 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $20.59 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020969 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $947.20 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020987 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $18.94 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020987 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 $1,120.88 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 021030 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 -$11.21 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 021030 50TH ST SELLIN CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 09/03/92 - $120.00 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020430 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $2,345.13 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020980 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ LI0903 09/03/92 - $46.90 QUALITY WINE LI19920902 020980 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNT LI0903 < *> $8.956.57* 129552 09/03/92 $88.00 THE WINE COMPANY LI19920902 2333 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 09/03/92 $3.00 THE WINE COMPANY LI19920902 2333 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI0903 < *> $91.00* $390,453.13* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY BY CHECK NUMBER THU, SEP 17, 1992, 2:34 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 $162,472.95 FUND # 27 $108.63 FUND # 30 $630.00 FUND # 50 $227,241.55 $390,453.13" w