HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-02_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 2, 1992
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items
marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests,
in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its
normal sequence on the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of October 19. 1992
*. II. PAYMENT OF CLAIM
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - Minnesota Chemical Health Week in Edina
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Analysis.of
Assessment by Park Director. Public comment heard. Action of Council by
Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to
pass.
* A. Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -92 - 4231 Oakdale Av (Coutd from 10/19/92)
II. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass.
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass.
A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1992 -1 - Amending City Code by Adding New
Section 1046 - Parking and Storage of Vehicles
B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1992 -3 - Amending Section 815 of City Code
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORT ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
* A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Mark Dalquist Addition - Lot 11, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 325 (Continue to 11/16/92)
* B. meal of Zoning Board of Apyeals Decision - Variance to Install Satellite
Antenna on Roof - 5324 62nd Street Rest (Contd from 10/19/92 - Continue to
10 11/16/92)
Agenda
Edina City Council
November 2, 1992
Page 2 Awd
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
V. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Irrigation for New Nine Hole Golf Course - Braemar
B. Outdoor Warning Siren
VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Park Board Recommendation - Gambling /Fund Raisers
B. Community Health Services Advisory Committee Recommendation - Illegal
Tobacco Sales
C. 1993 Recycling Grant Application
D. Approval of Bylaws - Regional Citizens Advisory Commission
E. Lead /Copper Testing Report
F. Appointment - The Edina Foundation Board
G. Appointments - Heritage Preservation Board
H. Resignation /Appointment - Community Education Services Board
I. Resolution Amending Year %VII CDBG Allocations
VII. COMMUNICATIONS /PETITIONS
A. 10/15/92 Letter Regarding Metered Ramps Hwy 100
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES 04
A. AMM 1993 Proposed Policies and Legislative Proposals
B. The Edina Foundation Audit
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XI. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 11/2/92: Total $577.260.55
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues Nov 3 GENERAL /CITY ELECTION Polls Open 7:00 A.M. - 8 :00 P.M.
Wed Nov 11 VETERANS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Mon Nov 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambel"
Thurs Nov 26 THANKSGIVING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Fri Nov 27 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Mon Nov 30 Truth in Taxation Hearing - 1993 Budget 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
A.
Cn
iaae //
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in the United States has reached
epidemic stages, and the 15 -24 year -old age group is dying at a faster rate
than any other age group; and
WHEREAS, red ribbons have been chosen as a symbol of individual and community
efforts to reduce the demand for drugs in our communities; and
WHEREAS, November 13 -20, 1992, is Minnesota Chemical Health Week; and
WHEREAS, business, government law enforcement, schools, religious
institutions, service organizations, communities, neighborhoods, youth, senior
citizens and individuals will demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and
prevent alcohol and other drug abuse by displaying red ribbons during
Minnesota Chemical Health Week.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 13 -20, 1992, be declared
Minnesota Chemical Health Week throughout the City of Edina.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council Members of the City of
Edina, in recognition of this event, support the activities sponsored by
Minnesota Chemical Health Week and Edina Chemical Awareness and encourage
community participation in drug awareness, education and prevention
activities.
MAYOR
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:41 PM
page
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
12340
11/02/92
$1,432.39
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66588
CENTENNIAL LAK
PRO FEE
ARCH/
11/02/92
$881.21
BRW INC.
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
66587
50TH STREET
PRO FEE
ARCH/
< *>
$2,313.60*
2341
11/02/92
.889
$200
CELLULAR ONE
MISCELLANEOUS
102192/H
GRANDVIEW
MISC
*
9 *
12342
11/02/92
$18.00
DAHLE, JANET M
REFUND PARKING PERMIT
112
50TH STREET
PARKING
PERMI
< *>
$18.00*
12343
11/02/92
$200.00
HARRINGTIN CO
MEETING EXPENSE
102192
GRANDVIEW
MEETING
EXPEN
< *>
$200.00*
12344
11/02/92
$23,500.00
MASTER ELECTRIC CO I
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME
10759
CENTENNIAL LAK
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$23,500.00*
12345
11/02/92
$14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SENIOR
LOAN TO OTHER FUNDS
NOVEMBER
EDINBOROUGH
LOAN TO
0TH F
< *>
$14,166.67*
$40,219.16*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:42 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
FUND 4 01 $40,219.16
$40,219.16"
MINUTES
OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OCTOBER 19, 1992
RO�CAT? Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 5. 1992, APPROVED Motion was made by
Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve ERA
Minutes of October 5, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CIAIM.S PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by
Commissioner Rice to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated October 19, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling
$19,367.06.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
o,
•,✓v. "•
S�
losses //
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL °
From: BOB KOJETIN, DIRECTOR OF
PARKS AND RECREATION
Date: OCTOBER 29, 1992
Subject: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR
TREE REMOVAL
4231 OAKDALE AVENUE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
I.A
Consent
E]
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Cancel pending special assessment for tree removal at 4231 Oakdale Avenue.
Info /Background
Due to confusion between the contracted tree service and the homeowner
regarding the time period for removal of diseased elm as recommended by the
Dutch Elm disease control policy, staff would recommend that the pending
special assessment for tree removal at 4231 Oakdale Avenue be cancelled.
The contracted tree service company has agreed to credit the City for the
amount of the assessment.
f�
A.
e i a �y
O
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1992
Subject:
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -3 -
AMENDING SECTION 815
OF CITY CODE
Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance No. 1992 -3.
Info/ Background:
Agenda Item # I I . B .
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Ordinance No. 1992 -3 amends Section 815, the Antenna Ordinance in
two respects:
1. Section 815.01 has been added which includes purposes
and objectives for the Section.
2. We have amended Subdivision 2 of Subsection 815.05, to
correct the formula with respect to the spacing between certain
towers and antennas and nearby lots in the R -1 and R -2 district.
The Council will recall that the initial draft of Section 815
provided a height limit for antennas and towers in the R -1 and
R -2 district of 50 feet. After receiving.testimony of amateur
radio operators, the Council increased the height limit in the
R -1 and R -2 district to 65 feet. Based on this change,
Subdivision 2 of Subsection 815.05 should have likewise been
changed from 50 feet to 65 feet. The proposed Ordinance effects
this change.
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -3
An Ordinance Amending Section 815 of the City Code by Providing
for a Purpose and Objective and by Correcting the Formula for the
Minimum Distance from Certain Towers and Antennas to Lots in the
R -1 and R -2 District.
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains:
Section 1. Subsections 815.01, 815.02, 815.03, 815.04, 815.05,
815.06, 815.07, 815.08, 815.09, 815.10, and 815.11 of the City
Code are hereby renumbered Subsections 815.02, 815.03, 815.04,
815.05, 815.06, 815.07, 815.08, 815.09 815.10 and 815.11,
815.12, respectively.
Section 2. There is hereby added to the City Code a new
Subsection 815.01 as follows:
11815.01 Purpose and Objectives
The purposes and objectives of this Section are to provide
for the safe installation of antennas, dish antennas and
towers and to minimize the adverse aesthetic impact of
antennas, dish antennas and towers on surrounding
properties, while permitting reasonable reception and
transmission of signals from antennas, dish antennas and
towers without excessive costs on the owners of antenna,
dish antennas and towers. To lessen the adverse aesthetic
impact on surrounding properties because of the unsightly
nature of antennas, dish antennas and towers, and preserve
the high quality residential character of Edina, and to
ensure that antennas, dish antennas, and towers are
installed in a manner that can withstand high winds and
other adverse weather conditions and do not constitute a
nuisance or pose a safety concern, the Council has
determined to impose size, height, location and installation
restrictions and requirements on antennas, dish antennas and
towers. The different size and shapes of antennas, dish
antennas and towers results in different degrees of adverse
aesthetic impact on surrounding properties and different
safety concerns. Because of the different aesthetic impacts
and safety concerns this Section imposes different location,
size, height and installation restrictions and requirements
for antennas, dish antennas and towers. In particular, this
Section imposes different restrictions and requirements for
dish antennas. The size and shape of dish antennas make
them more obtrusive and less likely to blend in with their
surroundings which results in a greater adverse aesthetic
impact on surrounding properties than antennas and towers,
and the shape of dish antennas makes them subject to a high
amount of wind force because the dish shape will trap wind,
with the larger the dish or higher the supporting structure
resulting in greater wind force on the base of the
structure. In determining these differing restrictions and
requirements the Council has considered what size and height
is necessary for an antenna, dish antenna and tower to
provide quality use and afford reasonable reception and
transmittal of signals and believes that the location, size,
height and installation restrictions and requirements of
this Section permit antennas, dish antennas and towers to
reasonably receive and transmit their intended signals and
do not impose excessive costs on owners of antennas, dish
antennas and towers."
Section 3. Subd. 2 of Subsection 815.05 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"Subd. 2. Additional Restrictions for Towers and Antennas
in Excess of 65 Feet in Height. In addition to the requirements
of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, the following minimum distance
shall be provided between (i) ground mounted towers, (ii) ground
mounted antennas, or (iii) ground mounted towers with antennas,
which are in excess of 65 feet in overall height, and the nearest
lot line of a lot in the R -1 District or R -2 District used for
residential purposes:
Minimum Distance in Feet = 20 (h -50) + 50
h = overall height of tower and antenna in feet"
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon
its passage.
Q
J
REF- ORTIREO OMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda item —P.
III '
B .
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
'
Information Only
Date:
NOVEMBER 2, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
1 I.
To HRA
Subject:
VARIANCE B -92 -42
FT
To Council
5325 62nd STREET
WEST FOR SATELLITE
Action
i x
Motion
DISH
Resoiution
Ordinance
-�
Discussion I
Recommendation:
Approve attached findings for denial.
InfoiSackground:
At their October 19, 1992, meeting city council directed staff to
prepare findings of fact for denial of a roof mount satellite dish
antenna located at the aforementioned residence. Attached for
review are said findings.
IN THE MATTER OF VARIANCE
FROM CODE SECTION 815 - FINDINGS OF FACT,
JAMES ERNEST AND REGINA CONCLUSIONS AND
AUFDERHEIDE, DECISION
5325 62nd Avenue West
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On March 4, 1991 the City Council directed City staff to conduct
studies of the applicable plans and ordinances of the City, and to give information
to, and make recommendations to, the City Council relative to the need and
desirability, if any, for adopting new or amending existing plans and ordinances of
the City relating to restricting, regulating or controlling the erection, location and
size of towers, antennas and dish antennas within the City. To allow such studies to
go on and to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the
citizens of the City, the City Council found it necessary and desirable to adopt, and
did adopt, on March 4, 1991, an ordinance imposing a moratorium on the issuance
of any permits for the construction, erection and relocation in the City of any tower,
antenna or dish antenna as defined in Ordinance No. 812 of the City as then in effect
(the "Moratorium ").
2. While the Moratorium was in effect studies were undertaken by
City staff and information was given to, and recommendations were made to the
City Council relating to restricturing, regulating or controlling of towers, antennas
and dish antennas within the City.
3. The City Council considered such information and
recommendations at meetings held on February 18, 1992, March 16, 1992 and April 6,
1992.
4. On April 6, 1992 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 812 -A3,
which ordinance has been codified in the Edina City Code as Section 815 (such
ordinance as so codified is herein called "Section 815 "). Ordinance No. 812 -A
became effective on April 7, 1992 and on such date the Moratorium was lifted.
5. In enacting Section 815 the City Council considered the various
height, size, locations and other requirements necessary for the receipt and
transmission of signals from towers, antennas and dish antennas. The City Council
also considered safety concerns and the aesthetic impact of such towers, antennas
and dish antennas on surrounding property.
6. Section 815 was enacted to regulate the installation, size, location
and height of towers, antennas and dish antennas in a manner which in the view of
the Council at the time of adoption of Ordinance No. 812 -A3 did not impose
unreasonable limitations on, or prevent, the transmission and receipt of signals by
towers, antennas and dish antennas or impose costs on the users of such towers,
antennas and dish antennas that are excessive in light of the purchase and
installation of the cost of the equipment, while at the same time having the least
adverse aesthetic impact on surrounding property and ensuring towers, antennas
and dish antennas are installed in a safe and proper manner and are able to
withstand high winds and other adverse weather conditions.
7. Section 815 imposes differing requirements on various towers,
antennas and satellite dishes. The reason for such differentiation was to permit
transmission and receipt of intended signals with the least adverse impact on
surrounding property and to ensure that installations were undertaken in a safe and
proper manner and that installed towers, dish antennas and antennas are not
hazardous, and was based upon information supplied to the City Council and public
testimony which indicated that such restrictions do not unreasonably limit or
prevent the transmission or receipt of the intended signal from such tower,
antennas or dish antennas.
8. The City has received a request for a variance from the
requirements of Section 815 from James Ernest and Regina Aufderheide (the
"Applicants ") to permit the location of a roof mounted satellite dish antenna on the
Applicants' home at 5325 62nd Street West. Such request was heard by the Zoning
Board of Appeals on October 1, 1992 and the Zoning Board of Appeals denied such
variance request. The Applicants have appealed the decision of the Zoning Board of
Appeals to the City Council. The City Council heard such appeal on October 19, 1992
and at such time heard testimony concerning the variance request.
9. Prior to applying for the requested variance the Applicants had
located a roof mounted satellite dish antenna on the Applicants' home in violation
of Section 815 and without the required permit. After being notified by the City of
such violation the Applicants removed the satellite dish antenna from the roof and
applied for the variance.
10. Mr. James Aufderheide, one of the Applicants, is in the business
of selling and installing satellite dish antennas. Mr. Aufderheide attended the
hearing held on March 16, 1992 on proposed Section 815 and did not object to the
prohibition on roof mounted satellite dish antennas in Section 815.
11. The Applicants' purchased their home in Spring 1992 and were
knowledgeable with the requirements of Section 815 at the time of purchase.
12. At the City Council meeting on October 19, 1992, residents of
neighboring properties testified in opposition to the granting of the variance and as
to the adverse impact of a satellite dish antenna mounted on the Applicants' roof on
their properties.
-2-
13. The Applicants have located the satellite dish antenna in a
nonconforming location and have made no attempt to place such antenna in a
conforming location or in a different nonconforming location which would have a
lesser adverse impact on neighboring properties.
14. Mr. James Aufderheide has testified that a satellite dish antenna
located on the Applicants' property in a conforming location is capable of receiving
satellite signals, and Applicants have submitted no evidence that a satellite dish
antenna is not reasonably capable_ of receiving satellite signals if it were placed on
their property in a nonconforming location other than on the roof.
CONCLUSIONS
1. No undue hardship exists since the Applicants can receive
satellite signals if the satellite dish antenna is located in a conforming location, the
Applicant's were fully aware of the requirements of Section 815 at the time of
purchase of their home and therefore any hardship to the Applicants is self created,
and the variance if granted will have a detrimental effect on neighboring properties.
Further, the Applicants have failed to demonstrate that there are no other locations
where a satellite dish antenna may be located which will have reasonable access to
satellite signals and have a lesser adverse impact on neighboring properties and not
be as obtrusive as a roof mounted satellite dish antenna.
DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions:
The City Council of the City of Edina determines to uphold the
decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying the requested variance.
-3-
Y
COPY
SENT VIA MESSENGER
FAEGRE & BENSON C O P Y
2200 NORWEST CENTER
90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3901
612/336 -3000
October 30, 1992
Winthrop A. Rockwell
612/336 -3183
The Honorable Frederick Richards Mr. Jack Rice
Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Council
City Hall City Hall
4801 West 50th Street 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55424
Mrs. Peggy Kelly
Edina City Council
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Mr. Glenn Smith
Edina City Council
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Mrs. Jane Paulus Mrs. Marcella Daehn
Edina City Council Clerk, Edina City Council
City Hall City Hall
4801 West 50th Street 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55424
RE: Aufderheide vs. City of Edina
Dear Mayor Richards and Edina City Council Members:
We represent Mr. and Mrs. James E. Aufderheide in
connection with their September 15, 1992 application for a
variance to place a satellite receiving antenna on the roof of
their home at 5325 62nd Street West in the City of Edina.
The Federal Standard
Pursuant to the United States Communications Act of
1934 (as amended), 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., the Federal
Communications Commission has adopted regulations' which provide
for the federal preemption of local zoning as follows:
147 C.F.R. § 25.104.
Page 2
October 30, 1992
State and local zoning or other recrulations that
differentiate between satellite receive -only antennas
and other types of antenna facilities are preempted
unless such regulations
a) have a reasonable and clearly defined health
safety or aesthetic objective; and
b) do not operate to impose unreasonable
limitations on, or prevent, reception of
satellite delivered signals by receive -only
antennas or to impose costs on the user of
such antennas that are excessive in light of
the purchase and installation costs of the
equipment. (emphasis added)
The quoted federal regulation specifically preempts local zoning
to the extent that such zoning "prevent(s] reception of satellite
delivered signals by receive -only antennas."
Within the setbacks imposed by Edina zoning ordinances
for ground- mounted satellite receiving antennas, there is no
ground location on the Aufderheide's property where the
Aufderheides can receive unobstructed reception of satellite
television signals. See, Aufderheide variance application, page
2. In short, with a ground- mounted antenna, located on the
Aufderheide property in accordance with the restrictions imposed
by the zoning code, satellite signals which are simply
unavailable.
The only location on the Aufderheide property where a
satellite receiving antenna can be mounted that will receive
unobstructed satellite signals is on the roof of the Aufderheide
home.
The Edina Ordinance and its Effect on the Aufderheides
While § 815 of the Edina city ordinances does permit
rooftop antenna installations, it prohibits installation of
antennas having a cross - sectional area greater than nine feet:
Subd. 3 Additional Restrictions for R -1 and R -2
Districts
A. Dish antennas
(i) Dish antennas greater than 9 square feet in
cross section area shall not be located on
the roof or exterior wall of a principal or
accessory building.
Page 3
October 30, 1992
(ii) Dish antennas shall only be located in rear
yards.
But the minimum size antenna for adequate reception of satellite
signals is a circular dish antenna at least eight feet in
diameter, which translates to a cross - sectional area of slightly
over 50 feet.
The technical conclusion that a minimum dish size of
eight feet is necessary to receive satellite signals is found in
F.C.C. Report and Order, "In the Matter of Preemption of Local
Zoning and Other Regulation of Receive -Only Satellite Earth
Stations," CC Docket No. 85 -87, adopted January 14, 1986, at
footnote 77, which states:
Under current technology, an antenna must be
at least 8 to 12 feet in diameter to
adequately receive video signals transmitted
by satellite. Space Reply Comments at 15 n.
7.
All of this means that the practical effect of the
regulatory scheme imposed by § 815 of the Edina zoning ordinances
is to deprive the Aufderheides of the ability to use the minimum
sized antenna dish necessary to receive the satellite television
signals specifically protected by federal regulation. The Edina
ordinance is therefore preempted by the Communications Act of
1934 and § 25.104 of the regulations promulgated under it.
The Edina Staff Report Does Not Support the Denial of the
Variance
The Staff Report of the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals
recognized the force of federal regulation, stating that the
federal "rules were intended to preempt local regulations." The
Staff Report states:
"staff acknowledges that local ordinance
cannot unreasonably interfere or restrict
access to satellite signals. In addition, it
would appear that the hardship of obstruction
caused by trees may satisfy the variance
requirements. The applicant has claimed the
proposed location is the best location [among
those] areas permitted by the code. In that
Page 4
October 30, 1992
regard-staff cannot recommend denial of the
request.Z
The clear implication, if not the express conclusion, of Edina's
own Staff Report is that federal law overrides Edina's zoning
regulations in this case.
Mr. Aufderheide has had a good and constructive working
relationship with the officials of the City of Edina. He is
concerned that the Edina City Council is headed in the direction
of denial of his requested variance based on a zoning ordinance
which directly violates the United States Communications Act of
1934 and its regulations.
Mr. Aufderheide has asked us-to convey to the City
Council that he very much hopes that this issue can be resolved
by the granting of his requested variance. However, Mr.
Aufderheide feels strongly enough about this issue that if the
variance is denied or delayed, he has asked Faegre & Benson to
proceed in federal court to set aside the pertinent parts of
§ 815 of the Edina zoning ordinance under the doctrine of federal
preemption. Preemption of local ordinances by federal law arises
under Article IV of the United States Constitution (the Supremacy
Clause) which is held by the United States Supreme Court to mean
that where Congress has expressly or impliedly preempted an area
of regulation, local ordinances and regulations are of no force
or effect. As you-can see from-the language of the federal
regulation, this is a case of express preemption.
Supporting Federal Authority
Edina's ordinance fails to comply with 47 U.S.C.
§ 25.104 because it unreasonably restricts the use of satellite
dishes to receive satellite signals. Federal and state courts,
since the F.C.C. adopted § 25.104, have consistently struck down
ordinances which unreasonably restrict the ability of a citizen
using a satellite dish to receive satellite signals. For
example, in Kipchak v. Vecchio, No. 86 CV 1492 (McL) (E.D. N.Y:
September 24, 1990), a New York federal court preempted a
Smithtown, New York, Ordinance restricting the placement of
satellite dish antennas on rooftops. The court stated:
The Aufderheides actually did not contend that the roof
was the "best location" but rather suggested that it was the only
location. The "proposed antenna will not receive satellite signals
from any other location on the property including locations
permitted by City Codes." See, Aufderheide Variance Application,
page 2.
Page 5
October 30, 1992
The Ordinance provides that satellite antenna four
feet or less in diameter may be mounted on a pole or
roof without a variance. The erection of a larger dish
requires a variance from the Zoning Board. . . . The
FCC Report and Order explicitly states that "an
ordinance which discriminates cannot impose size
restrictions only on receive -only antennas which could
effectively preclude reception." 51 Fed. Reg. 5524,
¶ 36. The FCC recognized that the smallest size
antenna capable of adequately receiving signals
transmitted by satellite is eight to twelve feet in
diameter. See 51 Fed. Reg. at 5524, Fn. 77; Van Meter,
616 F. Supp. at 1030; Alsar Tech, 563 A.2d at 89.
In addition, plaintiff has presented evidence to
establish that no manufacturer of satellite dishes
makes an antenna as small as four feet in diameter.
See Affidavit of Barry S. Altman, dated November 4,
1985 (Annexed to plaintiff's "Notice of Cross Motion ",
as Exhibit "B "). Mr. Altman, a manufacturer of dish
antenna avers that the smallest antenna made is six
feet in diameter, capable of receiving five percent of
the available satellite signals. Id. Therefore, a
Smithtown resident seeking to install a roof or pole
mounted satellite antenna is effectively relegated to
either applying for a variance or ground mounting the
antenna in order to receive significant satellite
transmission signals.
Id. at 10 -11. Since the Edina Ordinance is nearly identical to
the Smithtown Ordinance in that it restricts placing satellite
dish antennas on rooftops, the Edina Ordinance is similarly
preempted. See also Van Meter v. Township of Maplewood, 696 F.
Supp. 1024 (D. N.J. 1988) (federal court voided Maplewood, New
Jersey, ordinance that imposed a 6 foot height and rear yard only
siting limitation on satellite dish antennas); Village of Elm
Grove v. Pv, 724 F. Supp. 612 (E.D. Wis. 1989) (federal court
held that enforcement of Elm Grove, Wisconsin, ordinance violated
a dish owner's federally protected rights); Cawley v. City of
Port Jervis, 753 F. Supp. 128 (S.D. N.Y. 1990) (federal court
invalidated Port Jervis' ordinance which mandated "screened rear
yard installations without compliance with and successful
completion of a cumbersome variance process); Hunter v. City of
Whittier, 209 Cal.App.3d 588, 257 Cal. Rptr. 559 (Cal. App. 2d
Dist. 1989) (California court held that Whittier's ordinance,
requiring prospective dish owners to obtain a "conditional use
permit" violated F.C.C.'s rule); Alsar Technology. Inc. v. Zoning
Board of Adjustment of the Town of Nutley, 563 A.2d 83 (N.J.
Super. L. 1989) (New Jersey court held that Nutley's ordinance
that imposed rear yard only and screening requirements as well as
Page 6
October 30, 1992
7 foot height and 10 foot set back requirements upon satellite
dish antennas was preempted).
Edina's Ordinance also fails to comply with 47 U.S.C.
§ 25.104 because it does not have a reasonable and clearly
defined health, safety, or aesthetic objective. In a similar
situation, a New York federal court struck down a city ordinance,
restricting the installation and maintenance of satellite dishes
on rooftops, because of the lack of a reasonable and clearly -
defined objective. Kessler, 774 F. Supp. 711 (N.D. N.Y. 1991).
The court stated in its opinion:
Niskayuna's ordinance is preempted by the FCC
Order to the extent that it restricts use of
TVROs, because it does not state a clearly
defined permissible objective for its
disparate treatment of satellite dishes. In
its only statement of objective, the
ordinance provides generally that its purpose
is, inter alia, "to promote the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the
community." See Niskayuna Building Code
§ 1.2 (Purposes), quoted in full supra n. 3.
The ordinance is undeniably devoid of any
justification for the distinction between
satellite dishes and other antenna
facilities. Hence, under the FCC Order, the
Niskayuna Building Code is preempted as it
relates to satellite dish limitations.
Id. at 716. Similarly, the Edina Ordinance lacks a reasonable
and clearly defined purpose and, therefore, it is preempted.
Entitlement to Attorneys' Fees
The Aufderheides would be entitled to recover their
attorneys' fees from the City of Edina if they prevail in an
action to set aside all or part of § 815. Federal and state
courts have awarded attorneys' fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
and § 1988, to existing or prospective satellite dish antenna
owners adversely affected by unreasonable (and therefore
preempted) local zoning ordinances. See Cawley v. City of Port
Jervis, 753 F. Supp. 128, 131 (S.D. N.Y. 1990) ( "any person whose
rights under F.C.C. regulations have been denied by a local
governmental body has a cause of action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983.11); Van Meter v. Township of Maplewood, 696 F. Supp. 1024,
1032 (D. N.J. 1988) (court ordered municipality to pay satellite
dish owner's attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988);
Village of Elm Grove v. Py, 724 F. Supp. 612,.618 (E.D. Wis.
1989) (court allowed plaintiff to amend complaint to include
Page 7
October 30, 1992
claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1988); Alsar Technology. Inc.
v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Town of Nutley, 563 A.2d 83
(N.J. Super. L. 1989) (court ordered municipality to pay
satellite dish owner's attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 and § 1988).
We hope that the Edina City Council will take immediate
action to grant the variance requested by Mr. and
Mrs. Aufderheide. There is no benefit to either the City or its
citizens in ehgaging in unnecessary litigation to defend a zoning
ordinance which is so clearly defective.
Very truly yours,
Winthrop A. Rockwell
WAR /pjg
MGGIIDFO.WP5
cc: Edina Zoning Board of Appeals - SENT VIA MESSENGER
Mr. and Mrs. James E. Aufderheide - SENT VIA FAX AND U.S.
MAIL
--
5012 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN 55436
November 2, 1992
City of Edina
Edina, Minnesota
The events which we will attempt to elucidate began in
1971, when the Edina Village (now city) manager, the late Mr.
Warren Hyde wrote to the M.P.C.A. regarding possible pollution
in the two ponds on the subject property, caused by effluent
from the septic tanks -soil absorption systems from the houses
around the ponds.
The reply from the Executive Director of the M.P.C.A.,
Mr. Grant Merritt, strongly urges construction of municipal
sewer systems and regards individual systems as only a temporary
expedient. His reply also expressed sympathy for the residents
because all the lots are large, thus yielding fewer connections
and a much higher assessment for each house, and said "We are
sympathetic to the per lot cost, but it is not unlike the costs
being encountered in other suburban areas for sewer service
where large lot sizes are involved." He also said "As pointed
out by the Metro Council, if the village is going to require
large lot sizes, the cost of sewer service will be
proportionately larger."
Thus, in early 1972, the Edina Village Council was faced
with the double problem of providing sewer service to Ridge
Road at a cost the residents could afford, as they were not
nearly as affluent as are the current residents. There were
only two ways available to reduce the connection cost: reduce
the total cost of the project and increase the number of
connections. The city did both. The only way this could be
accomplished was to route the sewer across property owned by
Mrs. Harold Schaefer, AKA Ruth Schaefer, now deceased. By using
the Schaefer land the sewer could be installed at minimal depth
on Ridge Road to serve only the houses on the West side of Ridge
Road. The East side houses are considerably below the Ridge
Road elevation and to service them from Ridge Road would have
entailed a very deep trench, and deep digging is very expensive.
The sewer as installed runs South on Ridge Road from
Interlachen Boulevard to the cul -de -sac (now removed), East
to the Schaefer property, North 575 feet, and East to Schaefer -
Road. Also, extensions were installed to serve all the houses
on the East side of Ridge Road from the rear. This saved the
owners considerable money as all the septic tanks were located
in the rear and made connecting much easier and also avoided
the necessity of changing their internal plumbing around to
exit to Ridge Road.
In order to do this, they needed an easement from Ruth
Schaefer, an astute business person, who previously had sold
a number of lots off the perimeter of her property. The result
was that the sewer was designed and installed with six connecting
stubs serving six proposed lots and cul -de -sac on the Schaefer
property. This all appears on the city's sewer map. This also
was beneficial because it increased by six the number of
connections, thus lowering the cost of each connection.
The Village Council adopted a resolution on March 6, 1972,
ordering the sanitary sewer improvement SS -303 and this
improvement was subsequently installed.
At the public hearing, Mr. Warren Hyde, the village manager
now deceased, explained to the Council that the estimated cost
of $117,038.41 would be assessed against 29 lots at a cost of
$4,035.80 each. He added that six lots are deferred and the
connection charge would be paid if and when the property is
subdivided. The notice of public hearing states that the
proposed sanitary sewer system will involve properties not
directly abutting Ridge Road and it is proposed that these
assessments would be deferred until connections are made. From
the above it is obvious that the deferred six lots are the lots
they provided for on land owned by Mrs. Harold Schaefer in
designing this sewer improvement and the six lots are shown
on the sewer map of the City of Edina.
We claim that when the Village of Edina
the VERY valuable easement (at no charge) an
owner six building sites as described by Mr.
indicated by the six service stubs installed
to the city, that this constituted a binding
approving a 6 -lot subdivision that cannot be
the City of Edina. This prior approval also
any necessary variances.
Council accepted
3 assured the land -
Hyde, and as
at extra expense
legal agreement
abrogated now by
would include
For this reason and in view of the fact that six sites
along the sewer line which bisects the North portion of our
property were approved by the Council for the Village of Edina
on March 6, 1972, with no termination date, we ask that this
present Council fulfill the obligation of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, by approving the details of this subdivision as shown
on the accompanying drawings. We also ask the Council to adopt
a resolution at once, as subdivision of this property has been
under consideration far too long.
rk Da '` ist
�Guq
ee al uist
a
MINNESOTA, POLi'�9TIO,�9 CO�VT ROL AGENCY '
717 Delaware' Streot'S:E:/ �Minne'spoliA, Minnesota 55440 is
:. I Tele hone: ,(G_12`)`378 1320
Jam
��. 24; 197 ; ,; •.` �'.r,l. �f. .' -
• Mr. Warren C. HyT yl ..� �: ! ::.; .' ' r. , ' , , ; , ` f , �• ';
Village Manager I• r. ,.,:
Village of Edina 1 I .• a ; .: •I :: �, ;
4801 West 50th Street I• 1 r 'I .I; ; ;
Edina, Minnesota '
!' 551+x• -• •. :.,.. 1 • ' ' ; � .
Dear Mr. Hyde:
Reference is made to your letter of October 6 relative to providing
sewer service on Ridge, Road in Edina and the request for detailed-water `
quality surveys of these ponds and several private sewage.disposal
-' systems. I
As you will recall we referred your original request to the Metropolitan
Council and Sewer. Board, since they have the responsibility for providing
sewer service in-the Metropolitan area. They subsequently indicated to
' you that they considered septic tank —soil absorption systems in developed
areas unsatisfactory and not in keeping with their Metropolitan. Development
Guide. i
We agree with the Metropolitan Council's letter that sewer service . should y
be provided and although we are sympathetic to the '!peg lot" cost, it is
not unlike the costs being encountered in other suburban areas for sewer
service where large lot sizes are involved.
This Agency does not have adequate staff to conduct survyes . on individual
disposal systems; that, is a local problem. Certainly if the village is
regulating lot size issuing building permits and otherwise controlling
}. ' •. the construction''of individual sewage systems they have an - obligation to
�• insure satisfactory operation which should'include•inspection of those
,units suspected of malfunction.
.if We take serious issue with your inference that the only criteria upon
which to judge the adequacy of individual sewage disposal systems or their
' applicability in - developed areas, is whether or not they. are creating a
health hazard.
We view individual sewage djaposal systems particularly in the Metro area
as interim systems to be...used until such time as a,dequata'development permits
,•� j; installation of sewer systems. As pointed out by the'Mstro Council if the
' f village is going�to require large lot sizes the -coat fof,-sewer service will
.
I
44 .I , �
ba proportionate�,y highor.
,.. rr .
' 7f the village still feels it is desirable to conduct testin of he � '.1
g t ponds
t' . ; in the.area, we suggest again that it be arranged through the village staff
• • , : with sam le testin b our- .laborato ..I .•I
P ! 6 Y . wry if needed for validation of the data. , :. ,,%
.: : . ... . ''i ; Y drs very t . , .. !'�.
i' . . .. j I ,1 a, Y� . 24-'X�-7 - � 7. .; - , . 7
. 1 Grant J. rri t , j L,.' I
. 'i: - Executi ire I
r.' ctor. I.
' ;•; ..1 Ire ii..' '' 'I 1 1' ,' .
1 i 1.
'1
';' 1
:` y 1 .11
I. ;:
!:
,I.
11.,
t.... Ii.''.:
ii'
e
r
I..,!..
i
i
;,
I ' . 1, I 11, t ; ; y ,
1. t F { ! t 1 •1;:'r 1 ri ' ,,rr i.i' Ii;•I `1 :I..
1 , 1' :1 '' :, :r l' 'I ,' 'i. l °- i I,, ' ! I 1 i.t ' r , I.
:I. i i ,. ..I ,•.l. , 1, •',� t.. ".I 7' . ;'111 ,I r 1 ,, l.t t t ' ,: .
t . , ! I ., , 1 't
: '} `.'I ;r' IS;, r ! .1• .Ir: ( II _I„ l i ' '•' !1' I,1 t :,
' I 5..:,'.I•I ; t.. . , i, Il1;' i •.I. +.r.�', L ".,. ;.i:;.'
' 1 1 ) : 'I." . ` , , '•I .. 1. * !. - 1 • i. , 1 .i'r' t t I ' 1. - 'I: a ''' ':I• - ,
. �.�'I r - d'��i. - y..LI •'t> ;ic',.` :. rl. �.;` ..t 1. ,t �'
' 1' .'i. i•-..
.i. .i., :r. _ _
'• `,
. a'
y
:':.:,
. . ., ;. i 1 t '1 1 .1 ", , II ' i t I , i I' t' I ; ' ;1•. ( t t .. 'I
r lr• 'I 'I, r. 'r �. Y� ,•: 1'[L;.� i ,l ,1I'• ' .t. ,1..'I• 'I �i li ' ly a t'- i ? '•1, •,�^ '
' '•1• I' I• ' 'I ;II'i .i I „ 1 1 i I .1 l 1.
;L ( .i. •�� ..'.: ' 1.'1:.' �r r 1�, 1 � ' , -h. I 'I �, I I 1 '1. :•I r I Ii, !. : •-
>. %. •,
• _ t i r ' 1 Ij �, 11. '- 't.'' .b .I !'i.''I,'•' .i 11L. I;i / ! r ',•`,.1 1.
' .i . '1, •'r' `•I .l. :iii I•i �;. 1. '� i.- <! '� .'i• .f 1 (: Ili _ , 'i ..
t I I'I I I. � �' 'r I I ;. ..... . r ' ' 1' 4.
," ' , •I tl� r { d 1 1 f I 1 1 ..'...4%. . ' r l 1 I•.''. 1•: �.I i'•' ,r i, • -
•. t' .1 z i, , �� i 1. 1, r :t Cllr ..1. ,' .,1.Ii , ,.
�1 . 1 , , I li .. . - 1
... ! i 't - � I 1� f 11 1 `•, , 1 A rt It .VI t- 1 '1 , 'i:
'•. .. r 1 1 (} r e. t 1 •+ .. 1 r 1 h , P, - 1 :{ I
1 i . , ,•1 .1i !, 1 1. . . r !,: i 7' i' 1 , L 1 ,., ,
t '• `1.1; r. ; I , i. .1. .:' 1 h.` �' , .'.�.•..• ::I {.-y.. �:{:::. 1 •r" I 1 t . Lr r
I : i1 I.I; f h '�.. .. p A. �, # Y I r 1 4 '- . 1 I .1. :'I `' . I, .. ;r_ '
'.) 1 4'•. •'I•"AI 'I'. 1�I'•11 :Ii.1 l ;!�' rl .,I ..,• �,I I I , 1 , , 'r, .'.
r I 1 : ' I• 'r 11 1 I '; I r ii •I I ,.•' I •, I'
. ;• I. ' .'1- !1, • !. 1 ` .r • w' .1 I i ' ;. :I %; 1 ; ' 1 I t I .1 , , ,
;'f 4 I , I r t I: . 1
;' •I' - I'1 1'I _; ' ;1,•.11.1 • ,1•.":r(' •i i'r I illll 11 :: f,•::•'1;
' `, .i. ' 1'. ' 1.' ti', al ':1 !,. li'f '; I',: ii' I . I; s'!' r I ,I.I' ..r 7•I.' , \•''"'',1•
/ i I ; ; I 1 • ; r • 1 : I'll !, .1 , / I . , I I I, 1 i . ' ; I I
I ,''' ' :I '': .,'�• "' I•;� .�h' .:' 1`' 1'.'`I•,'ii li ^'1 I r .r �''i 1. �' 1 I.i ,
i . +I i' rJi ,,I ;: 11 i a.l I'', (. I it �r... r• l.:t
I 1 1 I; �I° I.I( :1 ,j _,I 1 ,7 ` 11: j' 1 ' {:
I 'I i r 1 .I I. :-i 'I 'F ! t•. _ ff' ' :,•'1• -• .. �. .i �1,.' .r:' '1
•1 I ' 1: .I I .�i i•I'.1 ''1' j: ', 1. 'I'.J: ".l •11: ,. •.I !• .
' I 'i I' •1' I .1 II . I. '4• .I "'1` •� 'l•.1. l. L: "I ' '6,,,.:'
1. • 1 .• C.
%II .ry:
i
'I
1 -I.1 I :r .L,'. is r.;• I`!r i:'li'' ''` i"
1 •ri 11 -. I I �i. •,..I,•(' .I .il .1.' . I .r !. s. �. .r. . .
li �rI, , 1 I': .II'i 11 )'''' i ` I, ` -' 1 rl.+.
i, . .• 1 ,,. I 1 t '
I ! .j . Dill. I �r' I. -t I ! 1
1 .. L .�.' ti. ,I. i�. II .ti•It1, , ' ' I ' { Y•. 1 I H ,.
. I ... I . �.' ' .i, il; '�I I ' I,) ' 111 .. 1 1• j - .t'
I I .I t• I; . Ir t•1 •
- ! / 7`
- +` '�1'� • 1 '
• • .' i X11 11111 I i ., ,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC KMIRING
PROJECT P -SS
�1{ -303
SANITARY SEIaER
PROJECT P -WIM -2_75
WATER f IF M
RIDGE ROIAD FROMI INTERT ACHEM ROAD
TO CUL -DE -SAC 1400 FEET SOUTH
The Edina Village Council will on Monday, March 6, 1972, at 7:00 p.m.,
at the Edina Village Mall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Fear -
ing on the necessity and feasibility of constructing sanitary se e' r.
and water rain on Ridge Road from interlache-'a Road to cul -de -sac
1400 feet South. A hearing was held on these improvements for the
same area on July 12, 1971. After considerable discussion the hearing
was continued "so that the Pollution Control Agency can make an
in depth study of cesspools and drainfields in the area and test the
lake to see if any contamination exists ..." Correspondence with the
Pollution Control Agency and the D'Ietropoli tan Sewer Board was initiated
and has been continuing since that time. The net result of this
correspondence is summed up in the enclosed January 24, 1972, letter
from bar. Grant J. Merritt. -
Later main is proposed along with the sanitary sewer to avoid the
necessity of dual disturbance of the street. Construction of the
sanitary sewer would require the complete removal of existing street
surfacing and base. Replacement of this base and surfacing is in-
cluded in the estimated cost of the project. Your receipt of this
notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to
you is among -chose properties which are considered to be benefited.
Estimated total costs and costs per connection of these improvements
are as follows:
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED COST
TOTAL COST PER COMJECTION
P -SS -303 Sanitary Sewer $117,038.41 $4,035.80 =Z`i
P -MM -275 Water -Na-in $ 37, 053.72 $1 :950:20 1 1
The sanitary seiner system proposed as shown on the enclosed sketch will
involve properties not directly abutting Ridge Road and it is proposed
that these assessments would be deferred until connections are made.
P� _
Page 2
Notice of Public Hearing
Project P -SS -303
Project P -UIX -275
It is hoped that the necessary easements can be obtained so these
projects can be constructed during the 1972 construction season.
Completion, however, would probably not be in time for assessment
until 1973 with the initial installment due in 1974. This improve-
ment is proposed to be assessed over a ten (10) year period. The
present condition of the Municipal Bond market makes it difficult
to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged on
the unpaid balance, but it will not exceed seven (7) percent.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the Tillage Council or Engineering
Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself.
If you desire additional information please call me at 927 -8861
between 8 :00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through.'Friday.
Thank you.
Robert C. Dunn, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and Village Engineer
RCD : rh
February 25, 1972
Enclosures
a
0J
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON
MONDAY, MARCH 6, 1972
'Hembers answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw, Van Valken-
burg and Mayor Bredesen.
MINUTES of the meeting of February 7, 1972, ;were approved as submitted by
motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried.
HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were pre-
sented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to
due notice given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter
recorded:
A. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING (P -SS -303):
Easement line over proposed road in Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 325
(Harold Woods Lane) from Schaefer Road to the East line of Lot 1, A. 14.
Hendrickson's 1st Addition, South along the East line of A. I.I. Hendrickson's
1st Addition to the Southeast corner thereof; West along the South line of
A. 14. Hendrickson's lst Addition to Ridge Road;
Ridge Road from Interlachen Road South to the North line of Lot 6, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 325;
Easement line North along East line of A. W. Hendrickson's lst Addition from
proposed main on Harold Woods Lane to Northeast corner of said addition;
=s.3 thence West along North line of said addition 140 feet;
Easement line from Interlachen Road and Ridge Road North, South in a South-
Easterly, Southerly and Southwesterly direction to the North line of Lot 3,
Margaret Cosgrove's Addition.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING (P -WM -275):
Ridge Road.from Interlachen Road to cul -de -sac 1400 Feet South
Items A and B above affecting the.same.property.owners, public hearings were
conducted concurrently. Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost
for Sanitary Sewer Improvement P -SS -303 at $117,038.41,'proposed to be assesse
29 assessable lots at an estimated cost per assessable lot of $4,035.80. lie
added that six lots are deferred and that those lots will pay the connection
charge if and when the property is subdivided. Total estimated construction
cost for Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -275 was given at $37,053.72, proposed
to be assessed against 19 assessable lots at an estimated cost of $1,950.20
per assessable lot. Mr. Hyde recalled that a hearing was held on these.im-
provements for the same area on July 12, 1971, and that after considerable
discussion the matter had been continued "so that the Pollution Control Agency
can make an in depth study of cesspools and drainfields in the area and test the
lake to see if any contamination exists." Correspondence with the Pollution
Control Agency and the Metropolitan Sewer Board was initiated and has been
continuing since that time. Mr. Hyde referred to a letter from Mr. Grant Merritt
of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency which advised that its staff is not
adequate-to conduct surveys on individual disposal systems and that if the Vil-
lage feels it is desirable to conduct.testing of the ponds in the area it
should be done by the Village staff, with sample testing by their laboratory if
needed for validation of the data. reference was made to a letter from Mr. C.
11. Carneal, 5117 Ridge Road, expressing opposition to the projects and asking
that the hearing be postponed until he returned home, and a letter from Mr.
Roy B. Burns, Jr:, 5108 Ridge Road, asking for further analysis of the project.
Mrs. C. M. Towle, 5013 Ridge Road, was told by Mr. Hyde that the there would
be no change in the character or physical appearance of the road after the
improvements are installed. Mr. Wayne Bergren said that he will be building on
his property this summer and urged the installation of the improvement, as did
Mrs. C. M. Towle, 5013 Ridge Road and Miss Ann L. Rutledge, 5116 Ridge. Road.
LexIsting ing that he believed that the improvements offer a long range solution to
problems, Councilman Johnson moved approval of the projects. Motion
seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improve -
later in Minutes.) Possibility of a 20 year assessment was mentioned.
C. CONSTRUCTION OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING IN THE FOLLOWING
P- E -27):
North -South alley between Zenith :Avenue and Abbott Avenue and between West
58th Street and West 59th Street
Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost of $13,789.33, noting that
of this amount the Village will pay 25% of the cost because maintenance costs
will be reduced over the cost of less permanent surfacings. He advised that
the estimated amount to be assessed is $10,342.00, proposed to be assessed
against 1,193.76 assessable feet at $8.66 per foot, or against 24 assessable
lots at $430.92 per lot. Mr. Hyde added that the improvement was .brought to
hearing in response to a petition signed by owners of fifteen properties. Mr.
Thomas C. Aulik, 5825 Abbott Ave. S., objected to the proposal on the grounds
3/6/72
Ir
that he would have no access to the alley by car and also said that the
alley should be oiled rather than paved. Speaking in favor of the project
were Mr. E. R. Nelson, 5801 Abbott Ave., the property owner at 5804 Zenith
Ave. and Mrs. S. J. Robson. No further comments were heard, whereupon
Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SE1•7ER IMPROVEMENT SS -303, WATEPSIAIN IMPROVEMENT WM -275
AND PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT E -27
LZ IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of,Edina, Minnesota, that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed
to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the fol-
lowing proposed improvements:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SZWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -303 IN THE FOLL014ING: `
Easement line over proposed road in Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No.
325 (Harold Woods Lane) from Schaefer Road to the East line of Lot 1,
A. I.7. Hendrickson's 1st Addition, South along the East line of A. W.
hendrickson;s 1st Addition to the Southeast corner thereof; blest along
the South line of A. W. Hendrickson's 1st Addition to Ridge Road;
j Ridge Road from Interlachen Road South to the North line of Lot 6,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 325;
Easement line North along East line of A. Td. Hendrickson`s 1st Addition
from proposed main on Harold Woods lane to Northeast corner of said
addition; thence Nest along North line of said addition 140 feet ;
Easement line from Interlahcen Road and Ridge Road North, South in a
Southeasterly, Southerly and Southwesterly direction to the North linJof
Lot 3, Margaret Cosgrove's Addition.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF I4ATER1IAIN IMPROVEMCNT NO. 1 *1 -275 IN TIME FOLLOWING:
Ridge Road from Interlachen Road to cul -de -sac 1400 feet South
3. CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE PAVING IN THE FOLLOWING ALLEY: (E -27)
North -South Alley between Zenith Avenue and Abbott Avenue and between
West 58th .street and West 59th Street
.and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being
fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with
the construction of said improvements, including all proceedings which may be
necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and
rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said
improvements are hereby designated and ahall be refarred to in all subsequent
proceedings as follows:
No. 1 Above SANITARY SEI4ER IMPROVEMENT SS -303
No. 2 Above WATER&JAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 47M -275
No. 3 Above ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT NO. E -27
.and the area to be specially assessed for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No.
SS -303 shall include Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Margaret Cosgrove's Addition,
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, A. W. Hendrickson's 1st Addition, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4; 5,
7, 9 and 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 325; the area to be specially assessed
for Watermain Improvement No. WM -275 shall include Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1,
Margaret Cosgrove's Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, A. W. Hendrickson's lst
Addition, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 325; the area
to be specially assessed for Alley Improvement No. E -27 shall include Lots 1
thru 24, inclusive, Block 3, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on
rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted.
(Senator Alf Bergerud, 5100 Ridge Road, was told that the assessment for his
vacant lot can be deferred at the Assessment Hearing, provided the lot is still
vacant. It was also reiterated that a request for a twenty year assessment will
be considered at the Assessment Hearing.)
YORKTO14N 'ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED. Mr. Luce recalled that at the meeting of
February 28, 1972, the zoning request of Mr. George Ablah had been given First
Reading and reviewed the variety of land uses within the proposed plat. Mr.
Lawrence Jolliffe, 5.517 Warden Ave., said that is is an attorney representing
three homeowners' associations which are also members of the Homeowners' Coal -
lition and requested that Second Reading be continued for 60 or 90 days to
give residents more time to assess the impact of the proposal. Mr. Jolliffe
said that the.main objection is concern about the high traffic volume on
France Avenue. Mayor Bredesen advised that, at the meeting of February 28,
1972, Mrs. William Scott's statements on the number of accidents which had
occurred on France Avenue were misleading, since less than half of the France
Avenue accidents were in the area of 14. 66th Street. (Mrs. Scott later said
that she was not trying to mislead anyone, but that Chief Bennett had said that
4 91N��1�'L
o In, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM:Bob Kojetin Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: October 29, 1992
AGENDA ITEM V. A .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Irrigation system for new 9 -hole golf course, Braemar.
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1Northern Irrigation Systems, Inc. 1. $173,150
2. Albrecht Company 2. $192.820
3•Arteka Natural Green Corp 3. $246,300
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Northern Irrigation Systems, Inc. $173.150
Includes both base bid Dlus alternate.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Bids are for the irrigation system for the Braemar Golf Course
new 9- holes. The low bid for the system is within the budget
for this project. This irrigation system will be compatible with
the existing systems at Braemar's other courses.
The attached bid tabulation indicates base bid plus the alternate
bid which is for the aeration of hole #25.
The Recommended bid is
r
Dgpatment
within budget not within
Kenneth Rosland City
Wallin. Finance Director
w
BID TABULATION - 10/28/92
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT 92 -13
Irrigation for New
Nine Hole Golf Course
Braemar Park
Improvement No. 92 -13
Northern Irrigation Systems,
Inc.
Albrecht Company
Arteka Natural Green Corp.
BASE
$163,400.00 1 $9,750.00 1 $173,150.00
$183,000.00 1 $9,820.00 1 $192,820.00
$236,742.00 1 $9,558.00 1 $246,300.00
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Craig G.Swanson
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: October 29,. 1992
AGENDA ITEM y. b.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Companv Amount of Quote or laid
1. Federal Signal Corporation 1. $10,825.75
2. Electric Service Company of Minneapolis, Inc. 2. $11,340.00
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5..
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Federal Signal Corporation
GENERAL INFORMATION: Siren will provide warning capability for
the Centennial Lakes Area.. The area is a high population.area that
does not have adequate coverage with the existing sirens. Siren.will
be funded by Civil Defense and HRA funds.
_S
Signature
Police
The Recommended bid is XX
within budget not within
Kenneth
City
Director-
C
4q%l lib ,
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Richards and City Council
Agenda Item #VI. A
From: Bob Kojetin
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: October 30, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Gambling /Fund Raisers
[E
To Council
Action
E
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Mr. Montgomery RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE EDINA ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATIONS BE ALLOWED TO ACCEPT FUNDS FROM CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
THAT RAISE FUNDS THROUGH LEGALIZED GAMBLING PURSUANT TO GRANT REOUESTS.
Mr.. Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. 7 in favor and 4 opposed. MOTION CARRIED.
Info /Background:
Enclosed are the minutes from the October 13, 1992 Park Board meeting.
There was at least one member present from 10 of the Athletic Associations
to give their recommendation on the gambling issue.
After the final recommendation was made by the Park Board to the City
Council, it was noted that this recommendation would be on the agenda
for the November 2, 1992 City Council meeting. The.Park Board .then
indicated that the.Athletic Associations could attend the City Council
meeting if they would like to hear what the City Council's recommendation
is.
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:30 p.m.
October 13, 1992
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Jim Fee, Bill Jenkins.,.
Bob Christianson, Beth Hall, Jean Rydell,.Mac.Thayer,
Paul O'Connor,-- Andrew Herring, Pat Vagnoni
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS PRESENT: David Paulin - Edina Girls Fastpitch Softball Assoc.
John Basgen., - Edina Hockey Association .-
Tami Halverson - Edina Girls Traveling Basketball
Carol`Mulheran.- Edina Swim Club
Gregg Nelson - Edina Soccer Association
Hollie List - Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club
Russ Fortner Edina Basketball Association
John Lettmann - Edina Baseball Association
Trish Brown/ - Edina Girls Athletic Association
Kaethe Anderson
Steve Cook, Mike Bolen, Keith VanLiere, Miriam Mitchell,
Scharlie Wikman Remele, Ed Hetland, Bette Hetland, Joy
Persons, Grace Mulcahy, Nancy Garnaas, Kevin McTigue
I. APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 8. 1992 MINUTES
Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 MINUTES. Paul O'Connor
SECOND THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. .
II. ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS
a. Fundraisers
Mr. Christianson stated that this topic was brought to the Park Board's
attention not quite a year ago when one of the athletic associations was
contemplating the use of charitable gambling proceeds to assist in running
their program. He also noted that the Park Board had a couple of meetings
on the issue and it then went on to the City Council. The City Council
made a determination concerning the propriety or lack thereof in using
gambling proceeds to help athletic associations run their programs. The
City Council referred the issue back to the Park Board for further review
and discussion. The Park Board then received input from the various
associations and recommendations from the staff. In the meantime the City
Council did additional work on charitable gambling in the city.
Mr. Christianson noted that he felt it is correct in saying that the City
Council's perspective on the use of charitable gambling proceeds was not
appropriate and that's were we are at this point in time.
Mr. Kojetin noted that the issue now is can the athletic associations
receive money from an organization outside of the community that is
actually running a pull -tab operation and putting it into their budget. An
example was when the American Legion in Hopkins area wanted to donate some
money to the Girls Athletic Association.. The American Legion has a lot of
different fundraisers and one of them is pull -tabs. Mr. Kojetin noted that
this association wanted to know if it was possible for them to receive this
type of funding.
AT THIS TIME, DISCUSSION WAS OPENED TO THE AUDIENCE.
Steve Cook indicated to the Park Board that he is not representing a
specific athletic association, but is a resident of the community who
believes the athletic associations should be able to accept charitable
contributions that have been generated from lawful gambling operations
outside the community. Mr. Cook stated that his understanding is that the
City Council passed the policy which does not allow athletic associations
to accept these funds because.the Park Board recommended this. Mr. Cook
also,stated that his understanding is that if an association were to accept
funds they would be denied the use of park and recreation facilities. He
noted that in a nutshell this is what he is trying to change.
Mr. Cook explained that one basic argument he heard was we are sending the
wrong message to our children by saying that we take money generated from
gambling proceeds and that's not the way to solve problems. Mr. Cook
stated that he disagrees with this statement for a couple of reasons.
First of all, he noted that no one encourages their children to drink but
yet money is generated from the liquor stores to help cover expenditures of
the city. He does not feel we are sending our kids a bad message because
it is a lawful activity that adults can partake in if they are of the age
and provided that they do it in acceptable ways. Another point Mr. Cook
asked was how many kids ask their parents where does the money come from so
that we can partake in these programs. He feels there are not any kids
that do this.
Mr. Cook also stated that the state of Minnesota has legalized gambling.
He indicated that he is not going to tell his kids to gamble because he
doesn't think they should. However, Mr. Cook thinks that when they are of
legal age they can make adult decisions relative.to the 'entertainment that
they want to partake in. Therefore, he does not think they are creating an
inappropriate message to the children by allowing the athletic
organizations to accept funds from lawful gambling.
Carol Mulheran, Edina Swim Club, indicated that they opposed charitable
gambling. She noted they are concerned about the legal liability and are
also concerned about the image that the Edina Swim Club portrays to the
young. She did state that the vote was extremely close but publicly they
do not support it.
Gregg Nelson, Edina Soccer Association, indicated that they are opposed to
charitable gambling by athletic associations. He indicated that the margin
of vote was against it by approximately a two to one margin.
John Lettmann, Edina-Baseball Association, indicated that they opposed the
acceptance of charitable gambling. The vote was about 14 to 2. Mr.
Lettmann indicated that registration costs to baseball participants right
now is a reason why the Baseball Board is in favor of the current policy.
However, if financing should become more difficult, the Baseball Board is
in favor of revisiting the issue. Mr. Lettmann also noted that maybe there
are alternative funding options available. Mr. Christianson asked what
alternatives they have discussed. Mr. Lettmann indicated the board is
having a person from Michigan come in and discuss different options. This
is in the forming stages right now.
Tami Halverson, Edina Girls Traveling Basketball, indicated that they are
in favor of accepting charitable gambling and they voted 11 to 1 in
favor. Ms. Halverson indicated that she was on the original girls_
fastpitch board that was offered charitable funds two years ago. She
indicated that contributions like this was the only thing that kept the
program going. She felt it is a whole different ball game if your athletic
2
association generates a lot more kids. Ms. Halverson felt that if it comes
down to a program or not a program.because of funds then each association
will vote differently on the topic.
John Basgen, Edina Hockey Association, indicated that they are in favor of
accepting money from charitable gambling and they voted 9 to 2. Mr. Basgen
indicated, however, that hockey will not ask for money from that type of
fund. The hockey association has been able to raise the money necessary in
most cases from registration fees and from their fundraiser which has
generally been pizza sales.
David.Paulin, Edina Girls Fastpitch Association, indicated that they are in
favor of accepting money from charitable gambling and they voted all in
favor with one abstention. Mr. Paulin personally thinks the board has a
tough job in tackling this issue. He indicated it is good to set a moral
standard but the liquor stores strike him as being very hypocritical.
Greg Nelson commented that he thinks the difference is that the athletic
associations are aimed at the youth and therefore there might be a little
different standard than the liquor stores which are not aimed at youth.
The feeling of the Soccer Board is that certain sources of funding might be
more inappropriate and gambling fell into the category. He stated that
Edina is a community based organization that has youngsters aged 6 to 17.
Russ Fortner, Edina Basketball Association, indicated that basically there
were zero gym costs up until approximately two years ago. Two years ago
they received a bill for approximately $3,000. He then indicated that last
year the bill was up to $9,000 for gym time. When the Basketball Board
found out that they would start being charged for gym time they looked to
where they could generate money and what fat could be cut out. He noted
that what was cut out was team pictures, pants, socks, and they revamped
the jerseys. As much fat as possible was taken out. Mr. Fortner stated
that no one can assure us that it has topped out or stopped. This is going
to be a continuous battle. Mr. Fortner indicated that at this point they
have voted not to vote on the issue because the treasurer stated that there
are ample funds for the foreseeable year. He also noted that this topic
has triggered a lot of discussions and a lot of emotions. Mr. Fortner
stated only so many people can do grant -in -aids and this year has increased
dramatically from last year. Mr. Fortner indicated that it's a hard issue
when we are fighting for survival and the only avenue they might have is •
something that the state and other people have turned to. Mr. Fortner
doesn't think it's right but it's a hard call. When you have a $9,000 bill
how are you supposed to pay the City and will they shut the basketball
program out of the gyms. Mr. Christianson indicated that it's not the city
it's the School Board. The City does not have any control over that. Mr.
Fortner also asked if you pass this issue how do you reopen it? How easy
is it to come back and say lets reopen something that we ruled on. This
would reopen all of the old wounds.
Mr. Christianson noted one thing that he thinks needs to be understood and
that is the Park Board does not pass anything. The Park Board makes
recommendations and he felt that Mr. Cook gave them more credit than they
deserved. This is the City Council's call.
Trish Brown, Edina Girls Athletic Association, indicated they voted in
favor of accepting charitable gambling funds 9 to 1. She noted that the
person who voted against it has resigned from the board due to this fact.
Ms. Brown stated that EGAA has gone through a lot of fee increases and have
also taken a lot of the fat out of their program. There are no longer
trophies, pictures, etc. She also stated that there were 25 kids last year
that required grant -in -aids. She explained that the board is not asking
for this to happen overnight. They realize that something like this takes
3
time to change. However, they are looking at maybe 3 to 4 years down the
road when things are a little bit harder.. She stated that the fees have
jumped and pretty soon kids will not be able to play because parents are
not going to be able to afford it. Ms. Brown also noted that they have the
same problem with paying for gym time as the boys basketball program has.
There is less gym time and higher gym costs.
Holly List, Braemar Figure Skating Club, indicated that are in a little bit
of a different situation. Because the Club's budget is over $100,000 they
are being wiped out by a lot of other clubs that receive funds in the
area. She stated that they are seeing a reduction in the skaters because
they can't afford it. They don't know how bad they are being hit with it,
however, they can really see it in the future.
Mr. Jenkins indicated that the Football Association was not ready to vote
on the issue at this time.
Mr. O'Connor made a couple of comments on the cost of the basketball
courts. His understanding was that a year ago a meeting was held to inform
everyone what they are actually paying for and that is the cost of
custodial services. He felt that Mr. Fortner and Ms. Brown have
communicated that they are paying a fee that is both exorbitant and unfair,
which he does see it that way. Mr. O'Connor also thought that this issue
was resolved a year ago and if that is not the case it should be revisited.
Ms. Brown replied that she thinks the fact that EGAA was not paying for it
at all and now they are paying for it is something that was not taken into
account on registration fees the first time they had to pay it. No one
relayed this fact to them. Therefore, they did not budget for this. Mr.
Fortner noted that the meeting a year ago was handled very well in
explaining were the costs come from. He did not mean to give the wrong
impression, but to note that these are real costs that are not going to
stop but will be an increasing cost. Mr. Fortner noted that they are
charging $65.00 for registration. Mr. Fortner noted that he does have
people who sign up and say $65.00 is becoming a high number and he does not
think they can go much higher but yet the expenses are going to continue to
increase and they cannot cut anything else out other than take away from
the kids.
Mr. Fee asked Mr. Basgen how many grant -in -aids hockey received this year.
Mr. Basgen replied that it was approximately 20 - 25, which is little more
than average from the last couple of years. The number has slowly been
going up. The question was asked what hockey's registration fee is this
year. Mr. Basgen noted that it depends on the level but for the Pee Wee
and Bantam level it is $190.00 and there is an additional surcharge for ice
after you are placed on a team. Ms. Halverson stated that is a lot of
money to be paying for that many grant -in -aids. Mr. Basgen stated that it
is a small percentage out of their whole budget. Ms. Brown noted that she
does not want the Park Board to think that these associations are hurting
so bad that they are all going to be demanding a lot of money. There may
be only one request this year for charitable gambling money. Ms. Brown
indicated that all of the associations are working hard to find other ways
to keep costs down. Ms. Brown knows of other communities that have
pull -tabs and raise a lot of money.
Mr. Christianson indicated that how he understands the situation is the
City Council has articulated a policy where there will be no charitable
gambling funds solicited by or used by Athletic Associations recognized by
the Edina Park Board. Mr. Christianson noted that he sees several courses
open to them. The Park can either do nothing and recommend to the City
Council that we affirm their previously articulated policy or we can make
some other recommendation.
FA
It was asked if someone wants to make a donation to an Edina Athletic
Association and the money came from charitable gambling, they can't take
it? Mr. Christianson indicated that's not true, the associations can take
the donation but they run the risk of losing whatever benefit the park and
recreation provides them such as field access, scheduling, etc. Ms. Brown
asked if they legally can do that. Mr. Christianson noted that the City
does not have to recognize associations that accept these charitable funds,
they can just leave the football fields, etc. open for general play.
Mr. Montgomery noted that he has a problem with accepting these donations.
Does someone have to go in and find out how each organization raises their
funds. Ms. Halverson noted that you fill out an application which
indicates where certain funds come from.
Mr. O'Connor stated that he brought the charitable gambling issue to the
School Board meeting and they unanimously did not want the Park Board to
recommend to the City Council that the athletic associations be able to
accept charitable gambling funds. All of the elected board members of the
school system said that they do not want the Park Board to support the
acceptance of such money.
Mr. Lord suggested becoming a little more creative and possibly having a
golf tournament to raise money. We have to be more creative if the City
Council is not going to allow us to use these funds that are out there
now. Mr. Lord stated that the Park Board has to help these people out
somehow. This way there could be some sort of an application process to
receive funds.
Mr. Christianson noted that he is sort of inclined to allow the
associations to apply for charitable gambling proceeds from outside sources
as long as those proceeds are fueled and divided by the associations on
some sort of an as needed basis. There would need to be an application
process.
Mr. Christianson noted that he is not unsympathetic to the situation that
these associations find themselves in. He is not unsympathetic to the
arguments that everybody else is doing it and it is a legalized activity.
Mr. Montgomery noted that he feels we should not close the door on these
people because who knows what it will be like in 1995. He would like the
associations to be able to take these funds and just say "thank you ".
Mr. Christianson suggested another idea of possibly giving people the
option of adding another dollar to their green fee at the golf courses that
will be given to the Edina Athletic Associations or something to that
effect and maybe people will put in an extra dollar. Mr. Fee indicated
that in the meantime these people need money, they are skimping and cutting
corners and not getting trophies or proper jerseys and pictures. Mr. Fee
felt that is all part of the program that he would hate to see kids missing
out on.
Mr. Christianson noted that the Park Board's job is to make a
recommendation to the City Council.
Mr. Christianson indicated that the athletic association's votes are sort
of an advisory and the Park Board does not necessarily have to be bound by
those. They are, however, very useful and helpful.
5
Mr. O'Connor made the point that he thinks it's interesting that the
association that charges the most to participate in has no problem nor do
they perceive one and they are generous enough to give 20 plus
grant -in -aids. Mr. O'Connor also pointed out that his kids do want to know
where the money comes from since a portion is paid by their lawn money.
Mr. Fee asked John Basgen if he thinks hockey has lost kids due to the
cost. Mr. Basgen indicated that he is sure there are more kids out there
who would like to play hockey but don't because it is too expensive for
their parents. Mr. Fortner noted that he has sat at the basketball
registration table for the last two years and the basketball program has
grown at the expense of hockey.
Mr. Montgomery RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE EDINA ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATIONS BE ALLOWED TO ACCEPT FUNDS FROM CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS THAT
RAISE FUNDS THROUGH LEGALIZED GAMBLING PURSUANT TO GRANT REQUESTS. Bill
Jenkins SECOND THE MOTION. 7 in favor and 4 opposed. MOTION CARRIED.
This recommendation will go to the November 2, 1992 City Council meeting.
b. Resident /Non- Resident
Mr. Christianson noted that there is apparently a question on whether or
not there should be open enrollment in our Park and Recreation athletic
programs similar to those in our school system. Mr. Christianson noted
that he understands that this is not allowed at the moment and the Park
Board wanted to solicit the advise of the athletic associations on this
issue.
Mr. Basgen indicated that hockey is governed by District 6. Only people
that live within the Edina City limits can play hockey for Edina.
Permission may, however, be given to someone in a different community to
play hockey in Edina if both communities agree with the request and
District 6 approves the request. Mr. Basgen stated that people have
attempted many different things to persuade the E.H.A. that they are
residents of Edina in order to play hockey here.
Mr. Christianson asked the associations if they want to change the-policy
to allow non - residents or open enrollment students into their program.
Gregg Nelson of the Soccer Association commented that soccer runs in club
formations drawing people from a number of geographic areas. Mr. Nelson
stated that the soccer association received a request from the traveling
group, to consider forming a team at the highest competitive level under
the Edina Soccer Association. The reasoning for this is that there is a
limited number of individuals who are willing to make a year round type of
commitment that is necessary to be competitive and what happens is there is
not enough players in Edina to field a team. In order to offer the
opportunity to develop themselves to the fullest potential, the traveling
soccer group has requested that this at least be considered. This is still
in the discussion stage, but Mr. Nelson wanted the Park Board to be aware
of it. The Soccer Association is unsure at this time whether they would
endorse this or not. Mr. Nelson pointed out that the obvious detriment
that he sees is a situation where an Edina resident would be denied
participation so that a non - resident with higher skills takes the place.
This topic is something new and controversial.
Mr. Christianson asked what the staff recommends on this issue. Mr.
Kojetin stated that there really are two different types of organizations.
There are team sports and there are individual sports. The individual
2
sports such as figure skating and swimming, Mr. Kojetin feels can have
anybody join. However, the team sports he feels should stay within the
community with Edina residents only.
Mr. Christianson noted that from his perspective the Park Board can either
do nothing, which means that the existing policy stays in effect, or the
policy can be changed. No Motion was made.
C. Increase In Field Maintenance User Fee
Mr. Kojetin noted that the city also has tight funds like athletic
associations. He informed everyone that the $5.00 maintenance usage fee
first started in 1987. Mr. Kojetin stated that this issue needed to be
brought up again because the city is cutting other areas in the park and
recreation budget. The reason that this fee was initiated in the first
place was the City Council had cut $30,000 out of the field maintenance
budget which directly goes to the preparation of baseball and softball
diamonds, fertilizers, and whatever else has to be done in the park
fields. The City Council indicated that if the athletic associations could
raise $30,000 then that money could be put into a portion of the budget
that would continue to give the same level of maintenance. As prices are
always going up, the City needs to raise this field maintenance fee by
$1.00. It is figured this would generate approximately $4,000 and would
bring the budget up to approximately $36,000 or $37,000.
Mr. Basgen asked if the field maintenance user fee includes the ice rinks?
Mr. Kojetin indicated that it does not, it only affects the outdoor
activities.
Mr. Lettmann indicated that baseball has approximately 1,000 participants
so it would be a pretty good increase. He asked if this increase would
maintain the present level of maintenance or would there be an
improvement. He felt that if the same level of maintenance is done with a
20% increase, that is not an improvement. Mr. Christianson noted that he
felt holding your own would be an improvement.
Bill Lord MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THERE BE AN INCREASE
IN THE FIELD MAINTENANCE USER FEE TO $6.00 AS OPPOSED TO THE PREVIOUS
$5.00. Pat Vagnoni SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Christianson expressed an appreciation to the athletic associations for
attending the Park Board meeting.
III. HIGHLAND PARK PROPERTY
Mr. Christianson gave a brief issue on the background of the Highland Park
Property. He noted that it basically boils down to whether or not the Park
Board, as a matter of policy, will make a recommendation to deviate from a
long standing policy of not conveying park property.
Nancy Garnaas, owner of the property at issue, read the ordinance which
specifically addresses land dedication or past contributions. Ms. Garnaas
indicated that what is critical is where it states that the city, as a
general rule, to acquire the dedication of land in the following
instances. If the property to be dedicated is adjacent to an existing
public park or playground and the additional property will beneficially
expand the park or playground.
Ms. Garnaas then pointed out her piece of property on a map and explained
what piece of property they wish to trade and donate to the City.
7
Ms. Garnaas noted that there are several benefits to the Park Department
and to the City through this trade. She stated it will enable the Park
Department to secure the necessary land to complete the acquisition of all
trails within the park. It would also be beneficial to the Park Department
for future development. Ms. Garnaas also pointed out that when the Park
Department wishes to access the meadow, they need to use a particular part
of the trail and this trail cannot be relocated off of the property as it
would necessitate the removal of many trees and would also require fill to
be put into the wetlands, which is against current state and federal law.
Lastly, she indicated that the city will benefit as it would allow Ms.
Garnaas to construct a single family dwelling on their property which would
generate new tax revenues.
Ms. Garnaas stated that the Planning Commission recommends action by the
Park Board and City Council relative to the trade and dedication of
property as well as the path encroachment.
A person in the audience asked Ms. Garnaas why they need a variance. Ms.
Garnaas,replied that they need it for width of the property.
Ms. Garnaas indicated that she was informed by a member of the Planning
Commission that this has been done before on three separate occasions.
Ms. Garnaas indicated that she discussed this proposed trade with the
homeowners on the perimeter of the park and has 23 signatures and 2 letters
in support of the dedication and the trade and /or sale of land.
Ms. Garnaas noted that they reside in the neighborhood surrounding Highland
Park that utilize a path connecting Skyline Drive, Lochloy Drive,
Interlachen Bluff, Interlachen Circle, Highland Ice rink, Soccer field and
Elementary School. She indicated that the signatures she has support the
Park Board to: 1) accept the dedication of the park path, and 2) to trade
or sell the park land to improve their plat. Ms. Garnaas also pointed out
that the property they wish to acquire is virtually useless to anyone
except them because of the cliff.
Ms. Garnaas stressed that it is important that due process be followed for
many reasons. Without each step in the process there is chaos and no
clarity. There are many issues to be raised by a subdivision and each of
those issues is planned and dealt with separately in the city's procedure.
Ms. Garnaas stated they want to go in process with each set of'answers for
each set of questions.
Ms. Garnaas then presented the Park Board with a video of the property.
Mr. Christianson asked who maintains the path, because it looks as though
someone goes through and keeps the brush down. Mr. Kojetin noted that the
City does not maintain the path, it's maintain by the people who use it.
Mr. Fee indicated that there is also a petition signed by people who are
against doing this and it looks like the majority of them are from Skyline
Drive. Ms. Garnaas noted that the petition Mr. Fee is referring to has to
do with subdivisions and not with the trade or dedication.
Mr. Herring indicated that he wanted to make a clarification that without a
recommendation for the exchange of land, the Planning Commission would not
recommend the subdivision? Ms. Garnaas indicated that she does not think
that is necessarily true, they did not say if the Park Board says no they
will not get a subdivision. Ms. Garnaas indicated that even with the
exchange they still need a width variance.
0
Mr. Kojetin indicated on the map exactly what Ms. Garnaas in asking for in
regards to the land and explained how the-variance would work.
Mr. Montgomery asked.if the Park Board does not trade the land what
jeopardy does that put the path in as far as what legal action could Ms.
Garnaas have against the City for having the path on their property.
Michael Bolen, 5207 Doncaster Way, indicated that he lives.directly west
and slightly south of this premises. He indicated that he just received
notice of this issue and has not had a lot of time to prepare. Mr. Bolen
stated that when he bought his lot the thing that impressed him was the
park area. It was complete and he felt as though he was walking
through the woods in north central Minnesota. There were no structures and
there were no improvements, you could walk around the path and see
pheasants and different animals. There was a complete feeling of
tranquility. Mr. Bolen also explained that when he called the park
commission a number of years ago on the improvement of the baseball fields,
etc., he asked about the wild area and.was assured that the park would be
kept in its wild state. Mr. Bolen also stated that one of the signatures
on the petition that Ms. Garnaas had, changed her mind and is.now opposed.
Mr. Bolen stated that he sees many people come to the park and spend time
in the wooded area, they find it very restful. He pointed out that it is
not just the people in this neighborhood who are using the wildlife area.
He feels that it is very unique. Mr. Bolen asked the Park Board to really
think before they trade this land for something.
Keith Van Liere, 5125 Skyline Drive, indicated that he is in the opponent
category. He indicated that has heard the comments from the staff and Park
Board members and it appears to him that for a trade to happen it needs to
be beneficial to the city. He asked that if there was not a,path that
crossed the area this would be a non - issue, because there would be no
benefit to the park. Mr. Van Liere indicated that he is trying to figure
out what the benefit is. Mr. Van Liere stated that the staff said that the
path could be moved if it became an issue. Mr. Christianson asked Mr. Van
Liere what the detriment is to the people who are opposing this.
Mr. Christianson noted that he walked the property and he noted that the
reason they are objecting to the property.is because of the result of
another house being built there. A woman noted that is correct,'it will
change the character of their neighborhood and this woman noted that she
has lived there for 40 years and has owned the property longer than that.
This woman stated that she doesn't want any park land given'up for anyone.
This woman also stated to the Park Board that if they have not seen the
property she does not want them.to vote for or against giving up the
property. Mr. Christianson asked the woman if Ms. Garnaas was proposing to
trade the land without requesting to build another house would she oppose
that? She indicated that she would not.'
Mr. Montgomery noted that Ms. Garnaas indicated that she heard this has
been done three times in the past. Has the Park Board ever traded property
or would this be the first time that the Park Board, would be in a,position
of having a "trade? Mr. Kojetin indicated that he is not aware of any
previous trades.
Miriam Mitchell, 5124 Skyline Drive, read a letter that her son wrote to
the Park Board. Ms. Mitchell noted that she has lived there for 43 years.
Her son indicated that the possibility of finding solitude and privacy in
the park would be forever lost if this were to happen.
W
Mr. Herring shared some thoughts and questions. He asked Mr. Kojetin if
the path were moved off the property would it be a big and /or expensive
task? Mr. Kojetin noted that it could be moved. However, sometimes in the
spring there may be some water on the path. Mr. Herring noted that he
would also like to have some information as to what rights the city may
have to the path, whether there was an easement or there wasn't an easement
and whether it has been used as adverse possession rights. He does not
know and he would like to have more information because this is being kind
of proposed as a quick quo pro for the grant of this,. Mr. Herring
indicated that it sounds like Ms. Garnaas has kept the lot in a wooded
condition but if this property were sold to a third party there is nothing
to prevent that third party from cutting down trees and building a fence to
.eliminate what'is an existing buffer between the wooded steps and the
existing lot line. Mr. Herring agreed with Mr. Montgomery in that he would
like to know what precedent there is for an exchange or any grant of park
property to an individual. Mr. Herring also pointed out that although the
.Park Board is not being asked to talk about the merit of building this
home, clearly the building of the home and what the Park Board does will
affect the likelihood of whether this home is built and if that impacts the
natural beauty of the park that's an issue with respect to the grant of
.that piece of property to them.
Mr. O'Connor indicated that he doesn't see the issue quite so broadly. He
really doesn't care if there has been precedence before or not. Mr.
O'Connor feels the question is very narrow, whether or not in the minds of
the Park Board this is a good exchange. From his perspective it seems to
him that Ms. Garnaas has kept this natural walkway for the community to use
and it seems like a fair exchange. The bigger issue about whether or not a
house should be built is not a decision for the Park Board to deal with.
Ms. Vagnoni had a question about the stairway. She noted that if the
property is extended and a home is built people might be a little more
hesitant about using that stairway into the park and maybe that would alter
the entry to the park. Mr. Christianson noted that Mrs. Remele told him
that the stairway is not used by a lot of kids because it hard to get their
bikes up and down.
Mr. Christianson noted that he appreciated everyones input from both the
opponents and proponents:' Mr. Christianson then went on to say that Mr.
Herring has raised some good concerns and he also agrees with Mr. O'Connor
to a certain degree. Mr. Christianson stated that the Park Board could
vote on this issue now, but he would prefer to have some investigation.made
as to whether or not similar circumstances have occurred in the past in
terms of exchanges of property, or'if the City can sell this property since
it was donated to the City.
Mr. Christianson urged everyone to walk on the property and check
everything out. He also stated that he is inclined to hold the decision
until the next Park Board meeting when more information is received.
Andy Herring MOVED TO TABLE THIS MOTION UNTIL THE NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING.
Andy Montgomery SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION APPROVED TO TABLE UNTIL NEXT
MEETING.
IV. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
A. Braemar Clubhouse Feasibility Study
Mr. Kojetin brought the Park Board up to date in regards to the feasibility
study that was conducted for the Braemar Clubhouse. He indicated that the
feasibility study was approved a year ago and it shows the different phases
of improvements that could be done to the clubhouse in future years.
10
Overall Mr. Kojetin felt the feasibility study has good merit in how to
improve the facility as well as increase the square footage in some areas
of the building.
Mr. Kojetin stated that the improvement to the new nine holes at Braemar
and the feasibility of increasing the size of the pro shop was part of the
bonds that were sold. There was $350,000 allocated for the expansion of
the pro shop and office facility at the clubhouse. Mr. Kojetin noted that
they opened the bids and awarded the expansion for the clubhouse at the
last City Council meeting. The expansion construction costs came in at
$323,000 and the architect fees were $33,000 so it was within budget. A
time table was not given for the expansion of the other areas of the
facility but the grill area will probably be the next consideration.
B. Braemar New Nine Holes and Normandale Golf Course
Mr. Kojetin indicated that they started grading on Monday at both golf
courses. Construction of both golf courses will be completed August of
1993. Both golf courses will be ready for play sometime in the summer of
1994. The irrigation bid for Braemar will be opened on October 28th.
V. CORNELIA SOFTBALL FIELD
Mr. Kojetin explained that since the softball fields were lost at Lake
Edina they have been building a field at Cornelia School Park where there
used to be a baseball field. A 300 ft. fence is being put up and they are
regrading. The money for this ball field is being taken from the
Normandale Golf budget and it will cost approximately $10,000.
VI. CREEK VALLEY SOCCER FIELDS
There are three soccer fields being put in at Creek Valley to replace the
soccer field that was lost at Braemar. The soccer fields will be side by
side and are 60 yards wide by 100 yds long. The softball field that was
there is being taken down. The money for these soccer fields is being
taken from the Braemar Golf budget and will cost approximately $15,000.
VI. OTHER
VII.
A. Edina Baseball Association Alcohol Policy
Mr. Montgomery noted that he read the Edina Baseball Associations's Board
policy on alcohol and he has a problem with it. It seemed to him that if
he is a non - official, and reports an incident it has to go through the
ethics committee. However, if he is a coach, chaperone, or umpire he can
immediately notify the participant of the behavior and suspend the
participant as well as notify the local law enforcement for any illegal
activity. The intent is everything should go through the ethics
committee. He doesn't think that a coach has the right to go up and tell
somebody that they are suspended and then you go through this other
process. He will call Lee Lippert from the Baseball Association on the
matter.
Mac Thayer MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 10:20 P.M. Bill Jenkins
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
11
r�
J
i 40���ji
�>1r� 11 RETORTIRELOMME�i 1DATION
.,V0•
i
To: KENNETH ROSLAND I Agenda item # vI B .
From: DAVID A VELDE Consent
Information Only
� Y L!
Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1992 Mgr. Recommends i I. To HRA
Subject: ILLEGAL TOBACCO n ' To Council
SALES
Action r lI Motion
Resolution i
Ordinance
i x II Discussion
i
Recommendation:
InfolEackground:
The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee has
discussed the issues surrounding tobacco use and its harmful
effects on people. The committee believes that the best way to
address this problem is by taking steps to prevent young people
from starting tobacco use at an early age. This can be
accomplished by making sure retailers do not sell tobacco to minors
(under 18) . The attached committee resolution suggests a. method to
address illegal tobacco sales using existing ordinances.
The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee hereby
recommends to the City Council that more aggressive enforcement
activity take place on at least a quarterly basis to reduce the
illegal sale of the tobacco products to minors at the licensed
tobacco sales points within the City of Edina and;
That the Edina City Council direct staff to pursue the
revocation of tobacco sales licenses from licensees who are found
to be repeat violators and furthermore;
That the annual fee for a license to sell tobacco products be
increased to $1000 and;
That the reapplication for a tobacco sales license after
revocation be double the original license fee and that the
individual tobacco license holders be notified of these provisions
after adoption by the City Council.
6
A.
w9� ^rte
o
cn
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
\N�b
lose
Ines
To:
Ken Rosl and
Agenda Item # -V-Lc-
From:
Janet Chandler
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date:
November 2, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
1993 Recycl i na Grant
❑]
To Council
Application
El
Action
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Resolution authorizing the 1993 grant application to Hennepin County for recycling
funding.
INFOBACKGROUND:
M in previous years, the application for Hennepin County recycling funding must be
accompanied by a city council resolution authorizing the application.
The funding policy adopted by the County in September is effective for 1993 through
1997, and provides $1.75 per eligible household per month for recycling program
expenses. Eligible housing units are defined as single family through 8 -plex residential
units, or other residential units with separate entry and where the individual residential
unit sets out its own refuse and recycling container, such as townhomes.
Edina's entitlement application is in the amount of $298,431, based on the current 14,161
households served plus an . allowance for a possible 50 new housing units to be added
during the year. The actual amount received will be somewhat less. For example, if no
new housing units are added during 1993, the funding will be $297,381.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.551, by December 31, 1993 each
county in the metropolitan area will have as a goal to recycle a minimum of 35 percent
(35 %) by weight of total solid waste generation, and each county must develop and
implement or require political subdivisions within the county to develop and implement
programs, practices, or methods designed to meet its recycling goal; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.552, counties shall ensure that
residents have an opportunity to recycle; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each city to implement a recycling
program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals; and
WHEREAS, in September, 1992, the County adopted a Hennepin County Residential
Recycling Funding Policy effective January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1997, to
distribute funds to cities for the development and implementation of waste reduction and
recycling programs; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, cities must meet the conditions
set for the in the "Funding Policy;" and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to receive these County funds;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council authorizes the submittal
of the 1993 Municipal Recycling Grant Application, Hennepin County Residential
Recycling Program; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City will use such County funds only for the
limited purpose of implementing the City's waste reduction and recycling program.
Date
Mayor
1993 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION
Hennepin County Residential Recycling Program
January 1 - December 31, 1993
EDINA
City
Part t: DESCRIPTION OF.. >.RECYCUNG, :.PROGRAM
Please provide a brief description of your city's recycling program within the space below. Include information on
promotional activities planned for this period. A resolution passed by your Council/Board/Commission approving
submittal of this application must be attached.
Edina's mandatory recycling ordinance requires all residents to separate their recyclables from other trash.
The City has contracted with Woodlake Sanitary Services for weekly city-wide pickup of recyclables from
all one through 8 -unit dwellings and plans to extend this contract for the period 1993 through 1995. All
other multi-unit dwellings have set up recycling programs for their residents as required. Haulers must
submit quarterly multi -unit recycling tonnage reports to the City.
Materials collected on the weekly route are: newsprint, corrugated, magazines, glass, cans, plastic bottles.
Mixed mail will be added in May, 1993; also, a special dropoff opportunity for telephone books in May for
residents who miss the winter collection.
The Edina Recycling Center continues in operation, accepting newsprint, glass, cans and office paper from
several apartment and condominium buildings. The City markets the materials.
In January 1993, the City intends to begin charging residents for recycling service on the utility bill, rather
than paying the cost from the General Fund. Pickup will continue to be at the garage rather than curbside
for single family homes.
Recycling information reaches the residents primarily through the quarterly city magazine About Town and
an informational flyer available at City Hall and also distributed by the Welcome Wagon program. In
1993, the City and Woodlake will co- sponsor a special flyer on recycling, composting, hazardous waste &
waste reduction, to be included in About Town.
Edina's residents have strongly supported the recycling programs and achieved a 26% waste abatement rate
(special recyclables such as appliances, household goods, tires or yard waste not included.)
:.....
rav: <.:..�.. ::.}:..:..: < tt.:.:...:..; ti... ....,ts..,.e..:...ttri}:::: };`•r t,:. <.,::,.rk'•'c,� -. .: tfi ::u..:':..,,,,- . }:•::.::::;... ..i•:i':::: f.:. :.;;:: ...+ a.
.. },F \ {.v .v3 xt.Y:` =` :. }vv.{.. ?iiJ.`. 'ice .
Part 11 : >EXPENDlTt7RES ............:.....:.... ' ..:.. :. .. .::
A. Program Administration
$ 32,000
B. Promotional Activities
$ 5,000
C. Collection
Curbside Collection Contractor Woodlake (RFT) r -ARAGE -SIDE SERVICE
$ 455,980
Drop -Off
$ 12,000
D. Curbside Collection Containers
$
Total Expenditures ..
.504.". 98'0e -'- .
Anticipated Revenues from Sale of Recyclables .
°° 4,000
...... ........ .
mow 'iii.:J... ��}.; v:4..} h:.�:::.... :•{r
.. - .:ii: w ... -
?i::V...... }:4`:iti2:,, -;; iiF:r • }in \ijw?ririLi:iu }'•ifi�• i •`••ii::: }:� }}�; •. A....
fart :lll ; :.ENTrM ENT:...... . UNT......... .. } v,....... v
..:.. ....... . .. .-.................. ...........................::.. {:.:. :.::::::: ;. v}: ii:}}}:.-:::.: i4' �v\ n: v-..... q};.?l 4? x:::.::.::.::: i:.•:S:l:Q;. }+iK{C' { :.::4iii4i: is
14,211 I x $1.75 per Household x 12 Months = . :: � 298,431
Part IV. ::TONNAGES ;:::
A. Residential Source - Separated Collections
Curbside
Drop -Off
Mulltti-Hoonuasing
Total Tons
PAPER:
Newspaper
Corrugated Cardboard
Office Paper
Mixed Paper/Junk Mail
Magazines
Phone Books
Computer Paper
Other Paper
2800
120
r,.q n
iAnn
130
100
30
80
Rn
140
140
30
METAL:
Alum. Cans & Foil
Steel & Tin Cans
Commingled Cans
Scrao. Metal
300
10
80
390
GLASS:
Food & Beverage
Other Glass
PLASTIC:
PET
HDPE
Commingled Bottles
Polystyrene
Film Plastics
Other Plastics
115
?q
14n
OTHER
RECYCLABLES:
Vehicle Batteries
Textiles
Carpet
Household Goods
Other
Other
Other
Total Tons
4375
240
f 1010
5625
Rec clip % (Total Tons divided by Res. Waste Gen.)
27%
B. Other Materials Collected (Not Recycled)
Tires 1 tire Q 20 lbs.
Oil (1 gallon = 8 lbs.
Other
Other
Total Tdns
Patt.11.:.<SIGNATURES..:.,.:.: .:..::.:...::::..:::. .:::::.:...:::.�..
Mayor or City Manager Date Recyciing Coordinator Date
w9��lAr
o ei
W
O
e ,H�FRfM• `O/
:auu
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Ken Rosland
Date: November 2, 1992
Subject: APPROVAL OF THE BYLAWS
SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMISSION
Agenda Item # VT T1.
Consent
F 7x
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: That the revised Bylaws of the South Hennepin
Regional Citizens Advisory Commission be approved. -
Info /Background: On September 16th, Jim Prosser met with the Bylaws
Committee to revise the document in accordance with suggestions and recommendations
of the Board of Directors. The revisions were subsequently approved by the
Commission on September 24th. I have reviewed this document with the other
three City Managers and feel it is consistent with the policies and procedures
which you have already approved.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
BYLAWS
of the
REGIONAL CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION
SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
FOR HUMAN SERVICES
MISSION STATEMENTS
Citizens Advisory Commission Mission Statement
To work cooperatively with others towards creating an environment in which individuals
are empowered to identify their needs and use the resources of the community to their
benefit.
South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Mission Statement
To assure that the human service needs of South Hennepin County residents are identified
through the use of research and planning, and where possible, met through the
coordination of service providers.
ARTICLE L
Name
1.1) The name of this organization shall be the Regional Citizens Advisory Commission
(referred to herein as "the Commission ") of the South Hennepin Regional Planning
Agency for Human Services (referred to herein as "the Agency ").
References to the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency
Joint and Cooperative Agreement
1.2) Sections 1.2 - 1.12, 2.1 - 2.8, 3.1, 3.5, 4.2, 5.1, 5.7, 6.1 and 6.3 of the bylaws are
stipulated in the Joint Powers Agreement of the South Hennepin Regional Planning
Agency. They shall be amended in accordance with amendments in the Joint
Powers Agreement. They cannot be amended through the powers of the bylaws of
the Commission. Each section includes a reference to the article and section
number in the Joint Powers Agreement (e.g. JPA V.1)
9/24/92 1
1 Definitions
2 1.3) For the purposes of these bylaws, the terms defined in this article shall have the
3 meanings given to them. (JPA II)
4 1.4) The participating Parties (Cities) are Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, and
5 Richfield; and are collectively known as the South Hennepin Area.
6 1.5) The "South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Joint and Cooperative
7 Agreement" is referred to herein as the "Joint Powers Agreement" or "JPA."
8 1.6) "South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency," or "Agency," means the organization
9 created pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement, which is formally known as the
10 "South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services."
11 1.7) "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Agency, and consists of the City
12 Managers of each Parry.
13 1.8) "City Council" means the governing body of a Party.
14 1.9) "Party" (hereafter referred to as City) means a governmental unit which enters into
15 the Joint Powers Agreement.
16 1.10) "Human Services" includes but is not limited to services and facilities to deal with
17 and serve human needs.
18 1.11) "Regional Citizen Advisory Commission" means an advisory Commission which
19 consists of two representatives from a local advisory group for each City, one City
20 Council member from each City, and one human services staff person from each
21 City.
9124192 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1.12) "Local Advisory Group" means the Commissions, committees or other
organizations which advise individual Cities on issues relating to human services.
ARTICLE H.
Membership and Composition
2.1) Voting members of the Commission shall consist of three representatives of each
participating City appointed by that City's Council, consisting of two
representatives from local advisory groups and a City council member. (JPA V.2)
2.2) . Non - voting (advisory-only) Commission members include one human services staff
person (the City Liaison) from each participating City as designated by the City
Manager. (JPA V.2)
2.3) The Commission shall annually notify the Cities of the names and occupations of
each of its members and make recommendations as to representation needs based
on the following criteria: (JPA VA)
a.) Representation from the racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds of
residents of the South Hennepin area.
b.) Representation from health professionals, administrative officials,
senior citizens, young adults of voting age, law enforcement
personnel, members of the clergy, representatives of business and
labor, persons with a disability, and others with special concerns
related to human service activities.
2.4) Insurance (JPA VII,11).
Appointment and Duration of Term
2.5) Appointments of voting members by City Councils shall be made in January of
each year and are encouraged to be made within 30 days of the occurrence of a
vacancy. (JPA V.2)
9/24/92
3
1 2.6) Appointments of voting members shall be for a term of two years commencing on
2 February 1, or until their successor is named. (JPA V.2)
3 2.7) Voting Commission members shall serve no more than three consecutive terms.
4 The term of the Commission member removed from the Commission by the
5 appointing city council shall terminate immediately upon such action by the
6 Council. (JPA, V.2 and VA)
7 2.8) Each City council shall adjust terms upon initial appointments and upon
8 subsequent appointments from time to time, as necessary, so that terms shall be
9 staggered to the extent possible. (JPA V.2)
10 2.9) Commission members who choose to resign shall tender letters of resignation to
11 their City council with a copy to the Senior Planner.
12 2.10) In the event any Commission member has three consecutive unexcused absences,
13 the City Council that appointed him/her will be notified.
14 ARTICLE IIL
15 Meetings
16 3.1) The Commission shall hold its organizational meeting in February of each year,
17 and meet at least quarterly thereafter. A schedule of regular meetings shall be
18 approved at the organizational meeting. (JPA V.5)
19 3.2) The Commission will meet at least once annually with the Board of Directors.
20 3.3) Additional meetings of the Commission may be scheduled as necessary. Meetings
21 may be called by the Commission chair, or two members of the executive
22 committee, or by petition of three or more members of the Commission.
9t24M 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3.4) Unless otherwise provided, regular meetings of the Commission shall be
determined by the Commission. All meetings of the Commission shall be
preceded by proper public notification and shall be conducted in accordance with
the state open meeting law, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.705.
3.5) Each voting member of the Commission shall have one vote, and there is no proxy
voting. A quorum of the Commission shall consist of fifty percent (50 %) plus one
of the eligible voting members, so long as there is at least one voting
representative of each City present at .any regular or special meeting of the
Commission. A majority of the quorum is necessary to decide any matters that
come to a vote. One representative for each City must be present for each vote to
decide matters that come to a vote. (JPA V.2)
3.6) Meetings of committees may be called at any time by the chair, or the lead
member of the committee. All meetings of the committees shall be preceded by
proper public notification and shall be conducted in accordance with the state open
meeting law, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.705.
3.7) Notice of special meetings shall be given to each member at least three (3) days in
advance of the day of the meeting.
3.8) Agendas shall go out before each Commission meeting.
ARTICLE IV.
The Advisory Process
4.1) The Commission may prepare statements of policy which shall serve to provide the
framework for its advisory responsibility on all matters.
4.2) The Commission shall identify matters of common concern of the member Cities,
and make recommendations regarding the annual work plan and goals and
objectives of the Agency. (JPA V.1)
9/21/92
5
1 4.3) The Commission may prepare and recommend processes and procedures in
2 addition to the bylaws, which shall serve to guide the Commission and Agency in
3 the pursuance of its duties.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ARTICLE V.
Officers
5.1) 'At the organizational meeting of each year, members of the Commission shall elect
from its membership a chair, a first vice chair, a second vice chair, and a secretary
In addition, it shall elect such other officers as it deems necessary. (JPA V.5)
5.2) The term of office of all elected officers of the Commission shall be for one (1)
year, or until their successors have been elected.. Such terms shall begin
immediately in the event of a vacancy, or at the organizational meeting.
5.3) The chair of the Commission shall preside at all meetings of the executive
committee and Commission and perform all duties incident to this office. The
chair shall, subject to the approval of the Commission, appoint all Commission
committees and task forces and their chairs, and shall be an ex- officio member of
all committees. The chair shall be the chief spokesperson for the Commission.
5.4) The first vice chair shall be given such duties as may be assigned by the chair of
the Commission.
5.5) In the event of the absence of the chair, the first vice chair shall act as the chair;
or, in the event of the absence-of both the chair and the first vice chair, the second
vice chair shall act as the chair, or, in the absence of the chair and both vice
chairs, the secretary shall act as the chair, or in the absence of the four named
officers, a voting member of the Commission shall be chosen to temporarily act as
chair.
9/24192
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
5.6) The Secretary of the Commission shall ensure that an accurate record of all the
proceedings of the Commission is maintained.
5.7) The Senior Planner and other staff of the Agency will provide staff services to the
Commission. The Senior Planner is hired by and reports to the Board of Directors.
(JPA VII.7)
ARTICLE VI.
Executive Committee
6.1) The executive committee shall consist of the chair, two vice - chairs, a secretary,
and others as designated by the Commission. (JPA V.7)
6.2) The executive committee shall meet as needed.
6.3) In the interim between meetings of the Commission, the executive committee shall
exercise those powers conferred upon it from time to time by authorization of the
Commission. The executive committee may refer matters brought before it to any
committee. (JPA V.7)
ARTICLE VII
Nomination and Election of Officers
7.1) The chair shall appoint a nominating committee, which shall consist of no fewer
than four (4) persons (to represent each of the four Cities) and shall be subject to
confirmation by the Commission. The nominating committee shall meet no later
than twenty -one (21) days prior to the organizational meeting in February.
7.2) It shall be the duty of the nominating committee to place in nomination the office
of chair, first and second vice chairs, secretary and such other officers as
designated by the Commission.
984192
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
7.3) The names of the nominees placed in nomination by the nominating committee
shall be sent to Commission members ten (10) days prior to the organizational
meeting. Nominations also will be accepted from the floor at the organizational
meeting.
7.4) The election of officers requires a majority vote of the quorum. One representative
from each City must be present for the vote.
7.5) The names of the newly elected officers shall be communicated to the Board of
Directors and City Councils of each participating City.
ARTICLE VIIL
Committees
8.1) The Commission shall authorize and define the powers and duties of all
committees that it creates.
8.2) The chair, with the approval of the Commission at the organizational meeting after
the annual election, shall appoint the members of all commission committees and
their chairs, and shall be an ex officio member of all committees. Special
committees may be appointed at any time by the chair with the advice of the
executive committee.
8.3) Committees should include representation from each of the participating Cities.
9.1)
9/ AM
ARTICLE IX.
Amendments
These bylaws may be amended, added to, or repealed by the Commission, subject
to review by the Board of Directors and approval by the City Councils.
8
114A.
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Fro Francis Hoffman, Dir. of
Public Works & Dick
Pelinka, Utility Supt.
Date. 2 November, 1992
Subject. Copper & Lead Testing
per EPA Rules
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # yT _ F.
Consent ❑
Information Only Fx-�
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ - Resolution
o ❑ Ordinance
Information only unless Council wishes to discuss issue.
Info /Background:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has new federal guidelines
requiring copper and lead testing. Attached is a memorandum outlining
our activities to date. The results indicate that we do not at this
point need to modify our water treatment system. We believe both
Minneapolis and St. Paul ,water systems are being modified as a result
of their testing. This testing is paid for from.the new charge required
by the Board of Health and it appears separately on our water bills under
Code MS. Each water connection pays $1.35 per. quarter to fund these
activities. Attached is a sample letter we plan to send to those who
participated.
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 23, 1992
TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
FROM: Dick Pelinka, Utility Superintendent
SUBJECT: COPPER & LEAD TESTING
The first round of sampling for the E.P.A. Copper and Lead
Testing Program began on August 3, 1992 and was completed on
August 31, 1992. Sixty samples were taken from sites targeted as
high risk using E.P.A. guidelines. The sixty sites were
structures that were built after 1982, having copper pipes with
lead solder.
The action level for the City of Edina is the 90th percentile of
60 samples for both lead and copper (60 samples x .90 = 54).
Fifty four of the 60 site samples must not exceed the copper and
lead action levels which are 0.015 MG /L lead and 1.3 MG /L copper.
The results of the first round of testing identified 4 sites that
exceeded lead limits and 0 sites exceeding copper limits.
The second round of sampling begins on January 1, 1993 using the
same sites. If the copper and lead action levels are not
exceeded during the two consecutive six month monitoring periods,
testing frequency may be reduced to yearly, and sampling.sites to
30, with State approval.
If after 3 consecutive years of testing and not exceeding action
levels, testing frequency may be reduced to once every three
years, with State approval.
SAMPLE
Dear Resident:
Thank you for your cooperation and participation in the first round of the
lead and copper testing program as mandated by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
Your test results were PPB (parts per billion lead), and
PPM (parts per million copper.
These results are below the EPA limits for copper and lead content in
drinking water which are 15 PPB lead and 1.3 PPM copper. The second
round of sampling is scheduled to begin on January 1, 1993. We will
again ask for your participation in the sampling program.
If you have any questions regarding the testing program or results,
please contact:
The Edina Health Department - 927 -8861
Minnesota Department of Health - 627 -5170 (General Information)
EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline - 1- 800 - 426 -4791
'1
A.
0 e �` 1 ch
0
• ,N�RPOW`tbv •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: COUNCIL MEMBERS
From: FRED R I CHARDS , MAYOR
Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1992
Subject: APPOINTMENT TO ED I NA
FOUNDATION BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VI . F
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Appointment of Kevin Ries.to The Edina Foundation Board of Directors as
Council Appointee for unexpired term to June, 1993.
Info /Background
I would recommend appointment of Kevin Ries, 5012 Nob Hill Drive, to The
Edina Foundation to fill the unexpired term of Warren Beck who had moved
out of the City.
rj It u _ - _ 1 i /•.LY 11 Y fa�Gr fTLn l %�t.
Y
Ti r -
gw! �-;1
IIEUELM a 927 -1196 * 4015 W. 65th St. Edina, MN 55439
November 2. 1992
Ta: Fred Richards
Kevin Ries' telephone # 829 -7000 (home)
# 829 -7100 (home)
# 927 =9196 (office)
Home Add: 5012 Mob HIll Drive
Kevin has been an Edina resident since 1965.
®0610
,k
O
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: COUNCIL MEMBERS
Agenda Item #
VI•G
From: FRED RICHARDS, MAYOR
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: OCTOBER 30, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: APPOINTMENT TO HERITAGE
❑
To Council
PRESERVATION BOARD
i
Action
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Consent of the Mayor's appointment of John F. Cooney, 5033 Kent Avenue, to
the Heritage Preservation Board to fill an un- expired term to 2/1/94.
Info /Background:
With the concurrence of the Council, I intend to appoint John F. Cooney to
the Heritage Preservation Board to fill the un- expired term of Lynn Barrett
who has resigned from the Board.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item -P.
VI.
I.
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
,
Information Oniy
Date:
NOVEMBER 2, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
L-�
To HRA
Subject
AMEND YEAR XVII CDB
[:xl
To Council
ALLOCATIONS
Action
17
Motion
I1
Resolution i
Ordinance
I�
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt attached resolution
InfolBackground:
Adoption of the Resolution will allow us to use CDBG funds to cover
the cost of an accessibility survey of City owned properties.
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request an
amendment to the project description for the funds in YEAR XVII,
Program #52042 Removal of Architectural Barriers to include the
following:
Accessibility Survey -City Properties $9,525.00
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Properties Accessibility be added
to the Removal of Architectural Barriers project in year XVII of
the Program.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of November 1992.
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request an amendment to
the project description for the CDBG funds in Year %VII, Program #52042 - Removal
of Architectural Barriers to include the following:
Accessibility Survey - City Properties $9,525.00
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Properties Accessibility be added to the Removal
of Architectural Barriers project in year %VII of the Program.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 1992.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 2, 1992, and as recorded in
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this November 3, 1992.
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM: VII.A.
October 15, 1992
Edina City Council
Dept. of Transportation
Edina Police Dept.
We are writing in regards to the meters on the entrance ramps
going north /south on Hwy 100 from 77th St /Industrial Blvd.
The traffic has increased substantially and we don't feel the
meters have accomplished what they.originally were intended for
which we believe was to reduce the traffic on Hwy 100.
We ask that you shorten the time between each light or remove
them all together.
�.�Vi:;
-� If you agree, please sign below.
lzu
Yt, -L:
1 `�.�.W^:r /`ice "i i v ✓.� // __
�Y 4 4.
���'� (over)
curL EiuL
'AL
AGENDA ITEM VIII.A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland
SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE POLICIES OF THE AMM
DATE: October 26, 1992
At the previous Council Meeting, I mentioned that I would list five policy
priorities that I thought would also be your priorities. In reviewing the
seven sections, I felt there was one theme that you as a City Council would
insist on. That was in the area of self government. I did not include any of
the fiscal considerations, as I felt that although it was a certain priority,
it is an area that we seem to have very little control or input.
The policies I am recommending to you for consideration at the November 2nd
Meeting are as follows:
II -A. Oppose Reduction of Authority or Local Control. Found on page 9.
II -I. Cooperation, Collaboration and Consolidation. Found on page 16.
III -A -3. Mandatory Land Use Standards. Found on page 18.
IV -C-1. Policy Planning -- Policy Implementation. Found on page 36.
VII -A -1. Election of Metropolitan Council. Found on page 1 of supplement.
We can discuss these policies further on November 2nd, and I will carry them
with me to the meeting on November 5th.
KR /sw
10
Ir
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER - WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page l
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131161
11/02/92
$3,958.90
AAA
LICENSES & PERMITS
102392
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$3,958.90*
131162
11/02/92
$434.53
ACTION MAILING SERV
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
003714
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
< *>
$434.53*
131163
11/02/92
$9.70
ACTION MESSENGER
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
346317
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$9.70*
131164
11/02/92
$88.18
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
06129841
CENTENNIAL LAK
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$88.18*
131165
11/02/92
$869.46
ADVANCED STATE SECUR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9787
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PROF SERVICES
4222
< *>
$869.46*
131166
11/02/92
$184.70
AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
REPAIR PARTS
8911 -00
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4181
< *>
$184.70*
131167
11/02/92
$13.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3004320
PW BUILDING
CONTR REPAIRS
11/02/92
$32.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3004320
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
/02/92
$6.50
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3004320
COMMUNICATIONS
CONTR REPAIRS
1 /02/92
$6.50
AIRSIGNAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3004320
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
11/02/92
$153.51
AIRSIGNAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
3004320
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
8211.51*
131168
11/02/92
$160.18
ALLIED PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
30589
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4201
< *>
$160.18*
131169
11/02/92
$25.00
ALPHAGRAPHICS
PRINTING
14799
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
<•>
$25.00*
131170
11/02/92
$25.00
ALSTAD, MARIAN
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
072392.
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
131171
11/02/92
$320.17
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
TOOLS
008507
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
4179
< *>
$320.17*
131172
11/02/92
$93.93
AMER. PHOTO COPY
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
11544A
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
4310
< * >,
$93.93*
131173
11/02/92
$119.71
AMERICAN EXCELSIOR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
173168
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$119.71*
131174
11/02/92
$222.46
AMERICAN SERVICES CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
000610
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$222.46*
131175
11/02/92
$74.56
AMSTERDAM PRINTING &
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92263 -92
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$74.56*
131176
11/02/92
$70.00
APWA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
9320
PWKS ADMIN GEN
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$70.00*
131177
11/02/92
$131.60
ASCAP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
102392
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$131.60*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 2
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131178
11/02/92
$11,237.72
ASSOCIATED POOL BUIL
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
100992
POOL CIP
CIP
< *>
$11,237.72*
131179
11/02/92
$145.54
ASTLEFORD INTL
REPAIR PARTS
A -90455
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4182
11/02/92
$90.53
ASTLEFORD INTL
ACCESSORIES
A -90479
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4272
< *>
$236.07*
131180
11/02/92
$6.02
AT &T
TELEPHONE
100392
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$18.82
AT &T
TELEPHONE
OCT 3, 1
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
<*>
$24.84*
131181
11/02/92
$35.00
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
15173
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
4199
11/02/92
$35.00
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
15218
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
4328
< *>
$70.00*
131182
11/02/92
$13.46
AXT -LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
102192
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$13.46*
131183
11/02/92
$163.06
BARCO PRODUCTS COMPA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0992235
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4013
< *>
$163.06*
131184
11/02/92
- $25.85
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
212020
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
11/02/92
$52.83
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
212341
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4196
11/02/92
$173.81
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
214586
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3914
*
< >
*
131185
11/02/92
$83.78
BENHAM, LINDA
CANCEL PERMIT /4200
50
101492
GENERAL FD PRO
MECHAN PERMIT
< *>
$83.78*
131186
11/02/92
$178.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
OCT 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
11/02/92
$312.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
OCT YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
11/02/92
$354.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
OCT VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
< *>
$845.50*
131187
11/02/92
$5.67
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
823851
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
11/02/92
$25.56
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
823851BI
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
11/02/92
$100.98
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
827890
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLI
11/02/92
$31.44
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
826333
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$181.18
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
830403
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$121.28
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
831369
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLI
3748
11/02/92
$3.54
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
831371
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$82.17
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
831371
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$551.82*
131188
11/02/92
$246.87
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
REPAIR PARTS
031081
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4048
< *>
$246.87*
131189
11/02/92
$34.15
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
MEETING EXPENSE
1410
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$34.15*
131190
11/02/92
$56.11
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102292
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
11/02/92
$50.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
MEMBERSHIPS
102292
GOLF PROG
MEMBERSHIPS
11/02/92
$23.40
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
102292
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
11/02/92
$12.78
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
PRINTING
102292
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
< *>
5142.29*
t
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
psye 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131191
11/02/92
$249.35
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
008062
BA- STREETS
CIP
11/02/92
$44.50
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
008003
PARKING /RAMP
CIP
11/02/92
$221.00
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
008015
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
11/02/92
$123.75
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
008004
BA- STREETS
CIP
11/02/92
$95.75
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
008182
IMPROVEMENT BA
CIP
< *>
$734.35*
131192
11/02/92
$100.55
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
236492
ART CENTER BLD
CLEANING SUPP
4072
11/02/92
$178.03
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
257723
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
4293
< *>
$278.58*
131193
11/02/92
$75.00
BURTIS, ROBERT
SERVICES 11/5 EDINBOR
092292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
131194
11/02/92
$171.23
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
142753
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
4300
< *>
$171.23*
131195
11/02/92
$24.40
CARLANDER, ANNE
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$24.40*
131196
11/02/92
$521.85
CARLSON PRINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
55612
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
4286
11/02/92
$990.45
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
55746
POOL TRACK GRE
PRINTING
4292
11/02/92
$383.40
CARLSON PRINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
55778
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
4534
< *>
$1,895.70*
131197
11/02/92
$264.11
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
302666
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4251
< *>
$264.11*
131198
11/02/92
$97.19
CDP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01606713
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$109.29
CDP
REPAIR PARTS
1609815
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$206.48*
131199
11/02/92
$38.70
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$10.60
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$10.60
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$49.83
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$55.97
CELLULAR ONE
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
102192/K
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
11/02/92
$83.29
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$67.62
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1021
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$77.88
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102192/P
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$229.54
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$114.48
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
11/02/92
$872.48
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
102192/P
DARE
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$1,610.99*
131200
11/02/92
$53.55
CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPL
CRAFT SUPPLIES
15100
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
4305
< *>
$53.55*
131201
11/02/92
$96.75
CERTIFIED HYDRAULIC
REPAIR PARTS
109835
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3951
11/02/92
$88.97
CERTIFIED HYDRAULIC
REPAIR PARTS
109834
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4195
11/02/92
$320.78
CERTIFIED HYDRAULIC
REPAIR PARTS
110022
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4202
< *>
$506.50*
131202
11/02/92
$5.21
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
SEWER & WATER
100192
CLUB HOUSE
SEWER & WATER
< *>
$5.21*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
131203
11/02/92
$32.38
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
VERNON OCCUPAN
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$32.38
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
PW BUILDING
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$32.38
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$32.38
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
50TH ST OCCUPA
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$208.91
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
PW BUILDING
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$759.85
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
CITY HALL GENE
SEWER & WATER
11/02/92
$32.39
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
100992
GENERAL MAINT
SEWER & WATER
< *>
$1,130.67*
131204
11/02/92
$75.00
CLELAND, BRUCE
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH 1
100192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
131205
11/02/92
$600.42
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$17.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
SEPT /PAR
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$617.92*
131206
11/02/92
$275.00
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
6656
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
4373
<*>
$275.00*
131207
11/02/92
$26.00
CONKEY, SARAH
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
<*>
$26.00*
131208
11/02/92
$90.48
COUGAR SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
109089
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL SUPPL
4404
< *>
$90.48*
131209
11/02/92
$213.00
CRITTER CONTROL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7592
PONDS & LAKES
CONTR REPAIRS
4425
< *>
$213.00*
131210
11/02/92
$575.10
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18688
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8893
< *>
$575.10*
131211
11/02/92
$144.65
CUSTOM FIRE APP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4219
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
4170
< *>
$144.65*
13 212
11/02/92
$209.00* D.
C. ANNIS SEWER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10105
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
4365
131213
11/02/92
$96.77
D.C. HEY CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
290401
ART CENTER BLD
CONTR REPAIRS
11/02/92
$31.50
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
292944
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$128.27*
131214
11/02/92
$50.00
DANEK, LEONARD
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
092292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
131215
11/02/92
$52.40*
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
SEPT YOR
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
131216
11/02/92
$29.49
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
30896
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
4101
11/02/92
$425.15
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
31736
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3908
11/02/92
$89.27
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
31758
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4037
11/02/92
$135.06
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
31863
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
4054
11/02/92
$359.78
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
31936
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
4106
< *>
$1,038.75*
131217
11/02/92
$2,807.60
DELTA DENTAL
HOSPITALIZATION
1026
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 5
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$2,807.60*
131218
11/02/92
$1,892.53
DEXTER
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
101692
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
< *>
$1,892.53*
131219
11/02/92
$576.14
DISPATCH COMM /MN
RADIO SERVICE
22609
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
11/02/92
- $25.77
DISPATCH COMM /MN
RADIO SERVICE
22609CM
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
c *>
$550.37*
131220
11/02/92
$63.44
DIST LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
090192
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
4529
11/02/92.
$17.51
DIST LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
090992
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
4529
11/02/92
$115.44
DIST LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
092292
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
4529
< *>
$196.39*
131221
11/02/92
$100.00
DUSSEAU, CONNIE
PROFESSIONAL SVC -
OT
102292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
<*>
$100.00*
131222
11/02/92
$1,104.40
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30314
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
3397
11/02/92
$431.73
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30313
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$1,536.13*
131223
11/02/92
$170.34
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
305596
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
3364
11/02/92
$99.32
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
306511
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
3215
< *>
$269.66*
131224
11/02/92
$156.66
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
617855
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$156.66*
131225
11/02/92
$770.00
EARL F. ANDERSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
119502
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
3807
11/02/92
$143.78
EARL F. ANDERSON
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
119569
GC CIP
CIP
4565
< *>
$913.78*
131226
11/02/92
$147.90.
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
43498
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
11/02/92
$11.50
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
43497
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$117.20
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
43492
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
11/02/92
$23.95
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
46178
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$300.55*
131227
11/02/92
$40.00
EDSTAM, JESSICA
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
131228
11/02/92
$105.02
ELECTRIC MOTOR REP.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
161947
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
4367
< *>
$105.02*
131229
11/02/92
$38.76
ELECTRONIC CENTER
REPAIR PARTS
550090
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
4040
< *>
$38.76*
131230
11/02/92
$217.38
EMER MED. PRODUCTS
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
116209
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
3736
< *>
$217.38*
131231
11/02/92
$300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$300.00*
131232
11/02/92
$6.10
ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
117704
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4329
< *>
$6.10*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT
28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131233
11/02/92
$1,189.89
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL
1847
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
1169
< *>
$1,189.89*
131234
11/02/92
$2,000.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
TC -92 -15
GC CIP
CIP
4213
< *>
$2,000.00*
131235
11/02/92
$16.00
FLECK, TERRY
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
816.00*
131236
11/02/92
$252.50
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
41549
50TH ST OCCUPA
EQUIP MAINT
4372
< *>
$252.50*
131237
11/02/92
$3,988.00
FOOT -JOY
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
093092
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
< *>
$3,988.00*
131238
11/02/92
$1,786.44
FORTIS BENEFITS
HOSPITALIZATION
102792
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$1,786.44*
131239
11/02/92
$50.00
FOWLS, DIANA
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH 1
092992
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
131240
11/02/92
$65.32
FRIDEN ALCATEL
POSTAGE
P1175191
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
11/02/92
$214.67
FRIDEN ALCATEL
POSTAGE
P1176424
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
4525
< *>
$279.99*
131241
11/02/92
$1,140.67
G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
101692
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,140.67*
131242
11/02/92
$90.25
GARTNER REFRIG INC.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
009122
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
4386
11/02/92
$359.74
GARTNER REFRIG INC.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
009140
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$449.99*
131243
11/02/92
$47.00
GEM TAP SERV
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
083192
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
9031
11/02/92
$28.00
GEM TAP SERV
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
093092
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
9031
< *>
$75.00*
131244
11/02/92
$388.73
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
307765
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4231
< *>
$388.73*
131245
11/02/92
$91.80
GET /GO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
7017
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
4325
< *>
$91.80*
131246
11/02/92
$77.75
GRAFFIX SHOPPE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6020
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
4186
< *>
$77.75*
131247
11/02/92
$180.00
GREAT WORKS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
101592
GENERAL TURF C
PROF SERVICES
4568
< *>
$180.00*
131248
11/02/92
$25.00
GUST, MARGARET
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
072392.
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
131249
11/02/92
$40.00
HADFIELD, BRADIE
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
131250
11/02/92
$61.19
HALLMAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
140609
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
4180
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 7
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
561.19*
131251
11/02/92
$30.00
HARMON GLASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
72001627
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4034
11/02/92
$252.39
HARMON GLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
72001632
EQUIPMENT'OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
4145
11/02/92
$79.34
HARMON GLASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
72001638
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4190
< *>
$361.73*
131252
11/02/92
$364.55
HEIMARK FOODS -
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
101592.
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$364.55*
131253
11/02/92
$54.99
HELENA CHEMICAL COMP
FERTILIZER
049274
CENTENNIAL LAK
FERTILIZER
< *>
$54.99*
131254
11/02/92
$745.65
HENN CTY MED CENTER
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
1990
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
8897
< *>
$745.65*
131255
11/02/92
595.76
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
102092
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRIS
< *>
$95.76*
131256
11/02/92
$6,127.98
HENSEL, DEDE
SERVICES /ARENA
101392
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$6,127.98*
131257
11/02/92
$89.88
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M
LINE MARKING POWDER
24947
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POW
2611-,
11/02/92
5105.17
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M
LINE MARKING POWDER
,24945
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POW
2611
< *>
$195.05 *"
131258
11/02/92
$880.00
HORWATH, TOM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
102092
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$880.00*
131259
11/02/92
$49.98
HOSE INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0015775
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4111
11/02/92
$50.15
HOSE INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0015876
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4111
< *>
$100.13*
131260
11/02/92
- $35.00
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
00811
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
11/02/92
$184.31
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5138
METER REPAIR
GENERAL SUPPL
3357
11/02/92
$401.61
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
101592
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
11/02/92
$171.68-
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
REPAIR PARTS
5147
METER REPAIR
REPAIR PARTS
8536
< *>
$722.60*
131261
11/02/92
$80.00
IIMC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
101992
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL.
< *>
$80.00*
131262
11/02/92
$90.00
IUEO LOCAL 49
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102392
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$90.00*
131263
11/02/92
$7,333.21
J PATRICK MOORE CO
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
9900
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
4377
< *>
$7,333.21*
131264
11/02/92
$52.00
JACOBSON, JILL
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$52.00 *.
131265
11/02/92
$933.66
JAFFEE.JAY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
102092
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$933.66*
131266
11/02/92
$1,010.30
JAMIESON AND ASSOCIA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
92992
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT
28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page.8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM - - -
- -- OBJECT-
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$1,010.30"
131267
11/02/92
$40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
102792
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$40.00*
131268
11/02%92
$53.37
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
C13251
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
4073
< *>
$53.37*
131269
11/02/92
$6.00
JOHNSON, ISAAC'
REGISTRATION FEES
102392
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$6.00*
131270
11/02/92
$100.00
JOHNSON, KEITH
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH 1
102292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
131211
11/02/92
$282.33
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
65051
70237
BUILDING MAINT
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL SUPPL
CST OF GD F00
3443
3796
11/02/92
11/02/92
$41.02
$71.31
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONCRETE
72692
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
3566
< *>
$394.66*
131272
11/02/92
$59.64
K &V LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
5709
6019
ARENA BLDG /GRO
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
CONTR REPAIRS
4012
4012
11/02/92
$278.20
K &V LIGHTING
< *>
$.337.84*
131273
11/02/92
$4,752.34
KARSTEN MANUFACTURIN
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
093.092
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
<*>
$4,752.34*
131274
11/02/92
$268.06
KEHOE,TERRENCE
_MEETING EXPENSE
1092
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$268.06*
131275
11/02/92
$211.20
KELLY SERVICES INC
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
40382921
41375171
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
4385
4528
11/02/92
11/02/92
$126.72
$412.00
KELLY SERVICES
KELLY SERVICES INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42390633
ELECTION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$749.92*
131276
11/02/92
$135.64
KLEVEN, LEONARD
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
102192
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$135.64*
131278
11/02/92
$24.99
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
021798
025803
PUMP & LIFT ST
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
2514
11/02/92
11/02/92
$30.85
$295.86
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
025819
032318
GENERAL MAINT
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS.
3049
3968
11/02/92
11/02/92
$22.88
$20.45
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
CONCRETE
032461
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
4030
11/02/92
$24.48
$81.95
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
033029
033277
BUILDING MAINT
CLUB HOUSE
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPL
4109
4083
11/02/92
11/02/92
$156.51
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
033478
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
4009
4176
11/02/92
$10.64.
$73.06
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
033693
033692
BUILDING MAINT
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
4176
11/02/92
11/02/92
$362.10
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
033682
033658
SKATING RINK M
SNOW & ICE REM
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPL
4173
4174
11/02/92
11/02/92
$95.37
$66.01
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
034013
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
4217
11/02/92
$22.48
KNOX COMM CREDIT
COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
LUMBER
034052
034094
BUILDING MAINT
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
LUMBER
9238
4243
11/02/92
11/02/92
$43.28
$19.16
KNOX
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
031505
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPL
3866
4268
11/02/92
$33.96
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
034555
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
< *>
$1,384.03*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 18, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. $
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131279
11/02/92
$15.00
KUCHEMAN, ANNIKA
REGISTRATION FEES
102092
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$15.00*
131280
11/02/92
$660.58
KUNDE CO INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
092692
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
( *>
$660.58*
131281
11/02/92
$315.83
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
1657500
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
7657
11/02/92
$222.34
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1827238
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3939
11/02/92
$43.39
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1830343
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4028
< *>
$581.56*
131282
11/02/92
$607.50
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18323
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
4247
( *>
$607.50*
131283
11/02/92
$28.99
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
953369
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
< *>
$28.99*
131284
11/02/92
$95.82
LEMCO HYDRAULICS
REPAIR PARTS
090492
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3725
( *>
$95.82*
131285
11/02/92
$19.00
LEONARD, MARTHA
REGISTRATION FEES
101792
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$19.00*
131286
11/02/92
$388.00
LETN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
89359
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
( *>
$388.00*
131287
11/02/92
$1,744.75
LILY'S OF BEVERLY HI
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
093092
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
( *>
$1,744.75*
131288
11/02/92
$115.53
LUHMAN, GLADYS
AMBULANCE FEES
102092
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
( *>
$115.53*
131289
11/02/92
$296.20
LUTZ, RICHARD M
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
102692
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$296.20*
131290
11/02/92
$292.12
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
15800
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$474.06
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
15885
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$363.64
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
15936
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$380.40
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
16017
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,510.22*
131291
11/02/92
$205.69
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27890
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4245
( *>
$205.69*
131292
11/02/92
$49.70
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$10,228.75
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
11/02/92
$164.85
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$10,443.30*
131293
11/02/92
$51.08
MCC /MIDWEST
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
73229
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
4301
11/02/92
$24.10
MCC /MIDWEST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
73229
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
< *>
$75.18*
131294
11/02/92
$100.00
MCCORMICK, CAROL
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH 1
081492
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
( *>
$100.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
- PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------!-----------------------------------------------------------------
131295
11/02/92
$88.00
MCGUIRE MECHANICAL
REFUND PERMIT 8920025
101592
GENERAL FD PRO
MECHAN PERMIT
< *>
$88.00*
131296
11/02/92
$20,559.65
MED CTR HEALTH PLAN
HOSPITALIZATION
101692
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$20,559.65*
131297
11/02/92
$26,551.50
MEDICA CHOICE
HOSPITALIZATION
102692
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$26,551.50*
131298
11/02/92
$375.00
MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
092292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$375.00*
131299
11/02/92
$36.08
MENARDS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
194674
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4567
< *>
$36.08*
131300
11/02/92
$1,036.03
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31177
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
4022
11/02/92
$315.93
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
31207
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4055
11/02/92
$451.29
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
31228
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
4123
11/02/92
$414.49
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
31265
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4177
11/02/92
$375.46
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31318
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
4239
11/02/92
$497.14
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
31352
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPP
4321
11/02/92
$497.88
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
31358
CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPP
4314
11/02/92
$476.26
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31371
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4371
< *>
$4,064.48*
131301
11/02/92
$643.50
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BUILDING PERMITS
JUNE
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$643.50*
131302
11/02/92
$1,386.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BUILDING PERMITS
SEPT
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$1,386.00*
131303
11/02/92
$244,847.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE METRO
50501192
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC MET
< *>
$244,847.00*
131304
11/02/92
$117.78
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
101092
101792
GRILL
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
CST OF GD F00
9037
9037
11/02/92
$21.59
METZ BAKING CO
< *>
$139.37*
131305
11/02/92
$240.00
MGCSA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102092
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$240.00*
131306
11/02/92
$52.53
MIDFORMATION INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7207
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
4407
< *>
$52.53*
131307
11/02/92
$100.04
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
DUMPING CHARGES
2095
STREET RENOVAT
DUMPING CHARG
11/02/92
$169.45
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8592
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
11/02/92
$1,790.99
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8592
PATHS & HARD S
BLACKTOP
< *>
$2,060.48*
131308
11/02/92
$36.20
MIDWEST BADGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
97907
ART SUPI,LY GIF
GENERAL SUPPL
3889
< *>
$36.20*
131309
11/02/92
$109.40
$471.13
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUP
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
7068
7112
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
PAPER SUPPLIE
3742
4374
11/02/92
< *>
$580.53*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1982, 9:36 PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131310
11/02/92
$192.10
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
12143
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
6342
<*>
$192.10*
131311
11/02/92
$91.15
MIDWEST SPORTS MKTG
GENERAL SUPPLIES
107728
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4405
<*>
$91.15*
131312
11/02/92
$31.00
MIHALCHUK, CASANDRA
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$31.00*
131313
11/02/92
$15.16
MINN COMM PAGING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100192/P
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$15.16*
131314
11/02/92
$326.05
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
11/02/92
$2,982.28
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
PW BUILDING
HEAT
11/02/92
$481.33
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
11/02/92
$102.76
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
11/02/92
$9,521.15
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
POOL OPERATION
HEAT
11/02/92
$326.74
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
11/02/92
$1.10
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
11/02/92
$906.17
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
11/02/92
$476.27
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
11/02/92
$1,595.12
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
11/02/92
$3.44
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
11/02/92
$50.73
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
11/02/92
$22.89
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
11/02/92
$68.19
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
110292
CENTENNIAL LAK
HEAT
< *>
$16,864.22*
131315
11/02/92
$459.42
MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
024108
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4021
< *>
$459.42*
131316
11/02/92
$33.00
MINNESOTA VETERINARY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
330155
ANIMAL CONTROL
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$33.00*
131317
11/02/92
$1,270.78
MN STATE TREA /BLG IN
BUILDING PERMITS
SEPT
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$1,270.78*
131318
11/02/92
$155.10
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PRINTING
88868
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
4080
11/02/92
$32.83
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
6860
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
11/02/92
$52.26
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
7027
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$240.19*
131319
11/02/92
$3,124.91
MN UC FUND
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA
3 QYR 92
CENT SVC GENER
UNEMP COMP
< *>
$3,124.91*
131320
11/02/92
$173.75
MN. BAR
MISSING JULY INVOICES
JULY SOT
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$173.75*
131321
11/02/92
$84.14
MN. CONWAY
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
23000
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
3749
11/02/92
$87.33
MN. CONWAY
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
23007
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
3750
< *>
$171.47*
131322
11/02/92
$115.48
MN. TORO INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
300542
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
4225
< *>
$115.48*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT
28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
----------------------
131323
11/02/92
-------- - - -
$427.34
- -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - --
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
175198
157197
STREET RENOVAT
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
11/02/92
11/02/92
$678.72
$603.31
MODEL STONE
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
157565
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
11/02/92
$628.45
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
157566
157567
STREET RENOVAT
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
11/02/92
11/02/92
$603.31
$147.41
MODEL STONE
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
157568
GENERAL MAINT
CONCRETE
< *>
$3,088.54*
131324
11/02/92
$45.00
MOTT, LUCY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311592
311595
CLUB HOUSE
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
3793
4389
11/02/92
$45.00
MOTT, LUCY
c *>
$90.00*
131325
11/02/92
$1,050.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030406
030405
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
CONTR REPAIRS
4375
4346
11/02/92
11/02/92
5588.00
$280.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030411
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
4430
< *>
$1,918.00*
131326
11/02/92
$503.00
MRPA ANNUAL CONFEREN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102792
PARK ADMIN.
CONF & SCHOOL
c *>
$503.00*
131327
11/02/92
$47.80
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
109211 5
109211 V
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
ADVERT OTHER
11/02/92
11/02/92
$47.80
$55.00
MUZAK
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
101692
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$150.60*
131328
11/02/92
$171.60
NAME BRAND SPORTS
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
102692
102692
BUILDING & GRO
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
4533
11/02/92
$250.60
NAME BRAND SPORTS
< *>
$422.20*
131329
11/02/92
— $110.01
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
815061
831445
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
3704
11/02/92
11/02/92
$12.46
$20.92
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
833726
EQUIPMENT OPER
OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
3826
3937
11/02/92
$38.55
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
ACCESSORIES
835158
835180
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3937
11/02/92
11/02/92
$8.83
$171.57
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
840868
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4240
< *>
$142.32*
131330
11/02/92
$70.00
NATIONAL ENV. HEALTH
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
102692
102792
PUBLIC HEALTH
LABORATORY
DUES & SUBSCR
DUES & SUBSCR
11/02/92
$70.00
NATIONAL ENV. HEALTH
< *>
$140.00*
131331
11/02/92
$901.39
NIKE INC
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
083192
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
c *>
$901.39*
131332
11/02/92
$69.87
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
506030
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
4312
c *>
$69.87*
131333
11/02/92
$251.48
NORTH COUNTRY FLAGS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8635
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
3743
c *>
$251.46*
131334
11/02/92
$183.35
NORTHWESTERN TENNIS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100192
TENNIS INSTRUC
GENERAL SUPPL
c *>
$183.35*
131335
11/02/92
$1,663.39
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
SEPT
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
c *>
$1,663.39*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 13
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131337
11/02/92
$7.03
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
100992
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$216.30
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
101092
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$545.35
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
101692
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$20,887.62
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
101792
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$3,059.23
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
101792
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$1,259.45
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
102092
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&.POWER
11/02/92
$8.84
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
102092
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$357.18
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
102092
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$1,622.22
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
102092
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$142.67
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$7.03
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$2,795.92
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$46.24
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$2,554.26
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$21.02
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$1,721.82
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$2,447.20
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$103.40
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$337.52
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$120.74
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$6,282.05
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$1,371.57
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$5,058.37
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$804.69
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$1,127.05
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$6,413.00
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
BUILDING & GRO
LIGHT
&
POWER
11/02/92
$84.10
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
110292
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT
&
POWER
< *>
$59,401.87*
131338
11/02/92
$79.46
NTCC
REPAIR
PARTS
4101006
PW BUILDING
REPAIR
PARTS
4122
( *>
$79.46*
131339
11/02/92
$68.11
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST
OF
GOODS SOLD FO
200503
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD F00
4076
11/02/92
$358.25
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST
OF
GOODS SOLD FO
200598
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD F00
4304
< *>
$426.36*
131340
11/02/92
$198.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERVICE
CONTRACTS EQU
178909
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR
EQU
4531
< *>
$198.00*
131341
11/02/92
$346.13
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32523
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
4226
< *>
$346.13*
131342
11/02/92
$160.67
OLD DUTCH FOODS
COST
OF
GOODS SOLD FO
100292
GRILL
CST OF
GD F00
9038
( *>
$160.67*
.
131343
11/02/92
$49.79
OLSON GRAPHIC PRODUC
LAUNDRY
130559
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
3888
< *>
$49.79*
131344
11/02/92
$426.29
OLYMPIC POOLS
SERVICE
CONTRACTS EQU
2769
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
4532
( *>
$426.29*
131345
11/02/92
$208.13
ORR SCHELEN MAYERON
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
101392
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF
SERVICES
( *>
$208.13*
131346
11/02/92
$47.91
ORVIS, JOAN
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
102192
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR
REPAIRS.
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT
28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$47.91*
131347
11/02/92
$19.00
OSTLIE, BRENDA BUZIC
REGISTRATION FEES
101792
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$19.00*
131348
11/02/92
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
0049
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9041
< *>
$74.00*
131349
11/02/92
$92.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
092692
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
11/02/92
$262.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
101092
CENT SVC GENER
PHYS EXAMS
< *>
$354.00*
131350
11/02/92
$30.00
PEARSON, SWANEE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
101692
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$30.00*
131351
11/02/92
$3,580.00
PERKINS LSCAPE CONST
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
102592
GC CIP
CIP
4212
11/02/92
$8,675.20
PERKINS LSCAPE CONST
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
1025
GC CIP
CIP
4232
< *>
$12,255.20*
131352
11/02/92
$62.66
PETERSON, BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
102692
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
11/02/92
$8.44
PETERSON, BARBARA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102692
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$71.10*
131 53
11/02/92
$48800
PHYSIO CONTROL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
D35979
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
8895
*
. *
131354
11/02/92
$420.00
PIONEER MIDWEST INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
45200
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
4215
*
*
131355
11/02/92
$3,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
102292
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$3,000.00*
131356
11/02/92
$150.00
PRECISION BUS SYSTEM
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
039192
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$150.00*
131357
11/02/92
$27.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
617794
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
< *>
$27.40*
131358
11/02/92
$1,725.24
PRO GROUP INC
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
092692
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
< *>
$1,725.24*
131359
11/02/92
$17.00
PROHNIAK, PAMELA
REGISTRATION FEES
101992
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$17.00*
131360
11/02/92
$55.78
QUICK SERV BATTERY
ACCESSORIES
89945
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3020
11/02/92
$295.98
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
24908
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4105
11/02/92
$135.53
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
90655
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3724
11/02/92
$67.99
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
26569
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4244
< *>
$555.28*
131361
11/02/92
5287.55
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
045504
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
4406
< *>
$287.55*
131362
11/02/92
$1,989.30
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
016948
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
4376
< *>
$1,989.30*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 15
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131363
11/02/92
$27.31
RADJENOVICH, JOEL
MEETING EXPENSE
102092
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$27.31*
131364
11/02/92
$138.96
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01872
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4530
11/02/92
$479.25
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01875
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
4478
11/02/92
$107.78.
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01874
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
4527
< *>
$725.99*
131365
11/02/92
$28.75
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
SEPT VER.VERNON
SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
11/02/92
$8,284.77
REX DISTR.
-COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$8,313.52*
131366
11/02/92
$3,328.87
RICHARD ELLES INC
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
102392
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
< *>
$3,328.87*
131367
11/02/92
$145.52
RITEWAY
REPAIR PARTS
132155
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4135
< *>
$145.52*
131368
11/02/92
$0.20
RITZ CAMERA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3750160.
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
4127
< *>
$0.20*
131369
11/02/92
$100.00
ROGERS PAINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
100892
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
131370
11/02/92
$4,958.00
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
2480
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
4265
1 "1/02/92
$2,788.50
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
2481
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
4265
< *>
$7,746.50*
131371
11/02/92
$116.83
ROSE BURNS CATERING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5646
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL SUPPL
4075
<*>
$116.83*
131372
11/02/92
$43.00
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
9244823
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR-EQU
<*>
$43.00*
-
131373
11/02/92
$95.75
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
230682
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
4481
< *>
$95.75*
131374
11/02/92
$294.69
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
REPAIR PARTS
0071193
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4194
< *>
$294.69*
131375
11/02/92
$14,487.18
RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
2
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$14,487.18*
131376
11/02/92
.$19.16
SANKEY. DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102692
SEWER CLEANING
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$12.50
SANKEY,-DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102692
GENERAL TURF C
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$63.95
SANKEY,.DIANE
REPAIR PARTS
102692
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$95.61*
131377
11/02/92
$90.77
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7767 -7
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
3961
.11/02/92
$100.80
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4195 -7
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPL
4084
< *>
$191.57*
131378
11/02/92
$60.00
SHIRLEY, TOM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102692
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$60.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
WED; OCT
28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 16
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
-- DESCRIPTION
- - - - -- -----------------------------------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. .#
- - - - -- -
- --------
131379
---------------------
11/02/92
- - -
$40.00
--
- -- --------
- - --
SIMMONS BROOKE
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
131380
11/02/92
$129.80
SNELL MECHANICAL
REPAIR PARTS
001451
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
4271
< *>
$129.80*-
131381
11/02/92
$16.09
SOCCER EXPRESS USA
POSTAGE
100592
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
<*>
$16.09*
131382
11/02/92
$36.81
SOKKIA MEASURING SYS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
104140
104138
MAINT OF COURS
MAINT OF COORS
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
2997
2997
11/02/92
$296.07
SOKKIA MEASURING SYS
< *>
$332.88*
131383
11/02/92
$116.60
SOUTHHAM BUSINESS CO
ADVERTISING LEGAL
CPCO2224
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$116.60*
131384
11/02/92
$121.45
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
1910379
1942407
EQUIPMENT OPER
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
4138
11/02/92
11/02/92
$67.68
$34.08
SPS
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
1944505
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4193
11/02/92
$35.33
$21.13
SPS
SPS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1945360
1946283
CENTENNIAL LAK
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
3988
4282
11/02/92
< *>
$279.67*
131385
11/02/92
$40.00
ST ANTHONY CIVIC ORC
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
092292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
<*>
$40.00*
131386
11/02/92
$8.81
ST. PAUL BOOK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
166776
GC CIP
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
58.81*
131387
11/02/92
$7.19
STERLING FENCE INC
REPAIR PARTS
11778
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
4121
< *>
$7.19*
131388
11/02/92
$602.79
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
54861.1
54364.1
POLICE DEPT. G
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
4093
11/02/92
11/02/92
$16.99
$101.12
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56099.1
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
4476
11/02/92
$34.08
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
56167.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
< *>
$754.98*
131389
11/02/92
$68.10
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET-
REPAIR PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
174234
9265
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
CONTR REPAIRS
4197
11/02/92
11/02/92
$190.00
$12.87
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
174316
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
11/02/92
$101.87
$10.48
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
174570
174630
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
11/02/92
11/02/92
$46.82
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
174706
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
11/02/92
$121.93
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
174808
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$552.07*
131390
11/02/92
$286.47
SUBURBAN PROPANE
GASOLINE
101792
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
< *>
$286.47*
131391
11/02/92
$29.99
TARGET
FIRST AID_SUPPLIES
093092/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
3734
< *>
$29.99*
131392
11/02/92
$35.12
TARGET
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
385520
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
< *>
$35.12*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 17
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131393
11/02/92
$50.00
TEGNER, ELEANOR
PERFORM EDINBOROUGH 1
102292
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
131394
11/02/92
$18.28
TESSMAN SEED INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
551
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4149
< *>
$18.28*
131395
11/02/92
$55.50
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4317525
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
11/02/92
$55.50
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4329799
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$111.00*
131396
11/02/92
$402.86
THE PRINT SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19909
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
3856
< *>
$402.86*
131397
11/02/92
$200.00
THE PUBLISHONG GROUP
ADVERTISING OTHER
101992
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERT OTHER
4479
< *>
$200.00*
131398
11/02/92
$11,462.45
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
11/02/92
$182.10
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
SEPT VER
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$11,644.55*
131399
11/02/92
$3,072.42
TITLEIST
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
093092
GOLF PROG
INVENTORY SUP
< *>
$3,072.42*
131400
11/02/92
$980.00
TOIVONEN PAINTING
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
100992
PAINT CAHILL S
CIP
4368
< *>
$980.00*
131401
11/02/92
$137.70
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
450299
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
11/02/92
$37.67
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
197360
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
4130
11/02/92
$7.34
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
197386
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
4171
< *>
$182.71*
131402
11/02/92
$31.38
TOOLS BY OLSEN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
43961
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
4220
11/02/92
$8.00
TOOLS BY OLSEN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17049
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
3859
< *>
$39.38*
131403
11/02/92
$159.75
TREEMENDOUS INC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
1197 -92
ST. IMPROV BA
CIP
4369
< *>
$159.75*
131404
11/02/92
-$91.68
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CREDIT
35692CM
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
2983
11/02/92
$175.54
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
46331
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
4071
*
< >
*
131405
11/02/92
$96.00
UNIQUE AIR INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7120
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
4088
< *>
$96.00*
131406
11/02/92
$167.08
US WEST CELLULAR
ROAD OIL
100192EB
BUILDING & GRO
ROAD OIL
< *>
$167.08*
131407
11/02/92
$50.40
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$405.55
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$206.74
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$112.18
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$163.47
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$59.92
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$139.55
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
GOLF DOME
TELEPHONE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:36 PM
page 18
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131407
11/02/92
$1,378.32
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
BUILDING & GRO
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
5217.39
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$154.17
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
11/02/92
$170.35
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
110292
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
< *>
$3,058.04*
131408
11/02/92
$178.00
VALLIERE, JOHN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
102092
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$178.00*
131409
11/02/92
$170.40
VENT -A -HOOD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3802
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4566
< *>
$170.40*
131410
11/02/92
$16.66
VETERAN
ADVERTISING OTHER
V101445
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
11/02/92
$16.66
VETERAN
ADVERTISING OTHER
V101445
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
11/02/92
$16.68
VETERAN
ADVERTISING OTHER
V101445
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
131411
11/02/92
$274.77
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
212251
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4059
< *>
$274.77*
131412
11/02/92
$1,541.92
VOTER REG /ELEC
SECT
POSTAGE
AUGUST
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
< *>
$1,541.92*
131413
11/02/92
$20.90
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
498 -6776
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
4204
< *>
$20.90*
131414
11/02/92
$41.22
WAKNITZ, CINDY
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
102692
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
< *>
$41.22*
131415
11/02/92
$232.90
WALKER PARKING
CONSU
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
66932
PARKING /RAMP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$232.90*
131416
11/02/92
$8.04
WALSER FORD
REPAIR PARTS
180020
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4133
< *>
$8.04*
131417
11/02/92
$185.31
WATER PRO
REPAIR PARTS
392881
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4183
< *>
$185.31*
131418
11/02/92
$475.00
WENDY ANDERSON
ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
101492
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
11/02/92
$737.50
WENDY ANDERSON
ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
102192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,212.50*
131419
11/02/92
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311593
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
3794
11/02/92
$45.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311594
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
4388
< *>
$135.00*
131420
11/02/92
$37.28
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
82397
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
< *>
$37.28*
131421
11/02/92
$225.05
WILLIAMS STEEL
ACCESSORIES
443314 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4056
< *>
$225.05*
131422
11/02/92
$17.00
WITZEL, ERIK
REGISTRATION FEES
101492
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
817.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9 :36 PM page 18
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131423 11/02/92 $17.04 WM H MCCOY GENERAL SUPPLIES 182708 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 3821
<•�
$17.04"
131424 11/02/92 $343.31 WORLD -WIDE SIGN COMP REPAIR PARTS 92 -14928 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3930
< *> $343.31"
131425 11/02/92 $52.39 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 54186443 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL 4480
< ■> $52.39"
$577,260.55"
COUNCIL
CHECK SUMMARY
WED, OCT 28, 1992, 9:41 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND #
10
$147,012.48
FUND #
12
$8,803.65
FUND #
15
$1,497.20
FUND #
23
$1,784.54
FUND #
26
$20,879.61
FUND #
27
$52,364.64
FUND #
28
$17,698.05
FUND #
29
$13.46
FUND #
30
$18,965.90
FUND #
40
$268,129.01
FUND #
41
$1,222.49
FUND #
50
$38,231.37
FUND #
60
$498.40
FUND #
66
$159.75
$577,260.55*