HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-12-21_COUNCIL PACKET*
*
*
*
EDnw HOUSING AND REDEVBLOPMBNT'AUTHORITY'"
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER...21, 1992
7:00 P.H.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda. -items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such
items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which.case the
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
- the - Agenda .
EDINA HOU93NO AND REDEVELOPMMT T-AUTHORITY
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of December 7, 1992
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - Kelly McNulty - Edina Hometown Day
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of December 7, 1992; Special - Budget
Meetings of July 6, August 3, September-1. November 30 and December 9, 1992.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by.Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote: of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval,.- Mark Dalquist Addition, Lot 11, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 324
B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Garnass Addition, Lot 15, Skyline. (5128 Skyline
Drive) (Continue to 1/4/93)
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS._.
* A.
* B.
* C.
* D.
* E.
* F.
* G.
5,000 Dozen Range Balls With "Braemar 3" Logo- (Contd from - 12/7/92) -..
1993 Park and Recreation Information Brochure
Fertilizer for Braemar. Golf Course
1993 Public Health. Nursing Service Contract
(6) Full -Size Police Pursuit Vehicles
Wanager's Replacement Vehicle
Production Services - Fall Issue of About Town Magazine.
Agenda._..:
Ediaa._City Cotmcil -
December 21, 1992
Page. Two
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS.
A. Transportation Utility Legislation
B. Staff Report on Tobacco Sales Enforcement
C. Council /Advisory Boards Annual Dinner Meeting
D. Beaver-Removal - Permit to Discharge Fire Arm
E. Indemnity Insurance
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL_
VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Traffic Safety Coordinator
I%. FINANCE
A. Payment -of Claims._as. per pre -list dated 12/16/92: Total $2,319,989.44 and
for- confirmation of payment of Claims dated 12/14/92: Total $351,181.61
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS_
Thurs Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE DAY - CITY HALL CLOSES AT -NOON
Fri Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Wed 'Dec
30
Year -End Council Meeting 5:00 P.M. Mgrs Conf Rm
Thurs
Dec
31
NEW YEAR'S EVE DAY - CITY HALL.. CLOSES AT NOON
Fri
Jan
1
NEW YEAR'S DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Mon
Jan
4
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Ved Jan 20 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Feb 1 Regular Council Meeting
Tam Feb 16 Regular Council Meeting
Sat Feb 27 LW0 - Meet City Officials
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
7:00 P.M. Council.Chambe-
9-11 A.M. Council.-Chambers
MINUTES
OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 7, 1992
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Rice, Smith, and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and vas
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the KRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1992, APPROVED Motion vas made by
Commissioner Kelly and vas seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve BRA
Minutes of November 16, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by
Commissioner Rice to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated December 3, 1992, and consisting of one page totalling,
$159,269.01.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
e
City of Edina
12/11/92
V01i, TYPED & REVERSED A/P
CHECK
REEISTER Pau
FRI, DE: 11, 1992,
10:31 AM --- req: LINDAD ------ ioc:
FINANCE- - - -- -job: 4254 #52305 ---------- proZ: CK2 0, ;1.07 > ---- repert
_k Payee ID.
Payee Name
Date Check-Amount Tyze
Salts Rei 7o Not=
.ED 010630 2102
MILLER & SCHROEDE"' INVESTMENT
11130192 5,031.09 HW
T ^,
hand
critter
SUB TOTALS:
-
Total Void Machine Written
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed:
Total Void Hand Written
0.00
Nueter
of
Checks
Processed:'
Total Machine Written
0.00
Number
cf
rnecks
Processed: is
Total Hand Written
5,037.09
Number
cf
Checks
Processes:
Total Reversals
0.00
Number
of
'necks
rrocessec: i
Tots: ;zr;ceiiet Checne
O.Ov
Number
of
Lnech-e.
- rocesseb:
SUc 7OIr
City of Edina
12/11/92
VOID, TYPED & REVERSED A!P
CHECK
REGISTER Page 2
DEC 11, 1992,
10:31 AM --- req: LINDAD--- --loc:
FINANCE -- --job: 4254 #52305 ---------- prog:
CK200 <1.07 } - - -- report it: G;RE6 - --
Check Payee I0. Payee Name
Date Check Amount Type
Subs Rel
To Note
V
.6RAN TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed: i
Total Void Hard Written
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed: (I
Total Machine Written
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed: i
Totai nand Nritter,
5,0';7.09
Number
of
Checks
Processed:
Total Reversals
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed: i
Total Cancelled Checks
0.00
Number
of
Checks
Processed: i
6 R A N D T0 TAL
5,037.09
WUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Twin Cities Campus
November 15, 1992
Fred Richards
- Mayor
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mayor -Richards:
Women's Intercollegiate Athletics 250 Bierman Field Athletic Building
516 l5th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis. MN 55455
612- 624 -8000
Far: 612 -624 -8018
I am writing to you regarding the University of Minnesota Women's
Intercollegiate Athletic Department, WCCO Radio and Cenex /Land O'Lakes
Hometown Day salute of student - athlete KELLY MCNULTY. We will be saluting
Kelly and the city of Edina Sunday, January 17 at 2:00 p.m. when the Gophers
take on Big Ten rival in basketball at Williams Arena on the U of M campus. I
would like to invite you and other representatives from the city of Edina to be
special guests of the women's athletic department: At this celebration, I am
asking you or a representative of the city to present a proclamation for KELLY
MCNULTY - EDINA HOMETOWN DAY]
This celebration is one of eight HOMETOWN DAYS, a promotion
designed to salute some of Minnesota's finest student - athletes. During its
inaugural year of 1989 -90, Hometown Days honored fifteen student - athletes
from thirteen Minnesota hometowns.
I look forward to meeting you and others from Edina. Please call me at
(612) 624 -4319 if you will be able to join us or if you have any questions or
ideas. I will be in contact with you soon. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Sincerely,
Mamie Slesinger
Promotions Intern
Ake
wCC01-
RADIO 8-3-0
WCCO AM'Radio-8 3'0-
Cenex/Land O'Lakes-
and_
University of Minnesota
Women's Athletics
Present
tY
i
�1
w e , tit
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota is actively concerned and involved in
nurturing and supporting the educational and physical development and achievements
of its natives and residents, and
WHEREAS, the achievements academically and athletically of our native citizen,
KELLY MCNULTY are a source of great community pride and interest as she
represents our hometown in the nation and at the University of Minnesota as an
accomplished athlete and student, and
WHEREAS; she will be especially honored during ceremonies at the University of
Minnesota; and "HOMETOWN DAYS" celebration of her achievements is
representative of the recognition our City supports,
THEREFORE, as Mayor of the City of Edina, Minnesota, I hereby do ordain and
declare the date of January 17, 1993, as
KELLY MCNULTY
EDINA HOMETOWN DAY
in the City of Edina.
Mayor
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TDB
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 7, 1992
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*!MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1992, APPROVED Notion was made
by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 16, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*EWARING DATES FOR PLANNING BATTERS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was
seconded by Member Rice setting the following dates for Planning matters:
1. Preliminary Plat Approval - Dalquist Addition, Lot 11 Auditor's Subdivision
No. 324 - December 21, 1992
2. Preliminary Plat Approval - Garnass Addition, Lot 15, Skyline - December 21,
1992
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Granger Addition, 5533 Vernon Av - January 4,
1993
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID CONTINUED TO 12/21/92 - 5.000 DOZEN RANGE BALLS (BRAEIIAR GOLF
COURSE ) Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to
contim, the award of bid for 5,000 dozen range balls with "Braemar 3" Logo to
December 21, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
MNDOT RAMP METERING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS OVERVIEW GIVEN Engineer Hoffman
introduced Glen Carlson, Manager of Minnesota Department of Transportation
( MNDOT) Traffic Management Center (TMC) and Rich Lau, MNDOT Traffic Systems
Engineer, who were invited by Council to present an overview of the traffic
management program and discuss the T.H. 100 and 77th Street ramp meters.
By letter dated November 30, 1992, William M. Crawford, MNDOT Metro Division
Engineer had responded to citizen petitions forwarded by staff regarding ramp
meters at T.H. 100 and 77th Street. Mr. Crawford had also included a draft
letter to be sent to the petitioners who had raised the issue.
Mr. Carlson indicated that MNDOT had received complaints on ramp metering in
Edina, and specifically at 77th Street and T.H. 100. TMC is analyzing
alternatives to improve traffic flow at the T.H. 100 and 77th Street interchange
and have already made some timing adjustments. A project is being let for July,
1993 to be completed in November, 1993 to improve the weaving area on southbound
T.H. 100 at the exit to I -494.
Mr. Carlson then presented a graphic illustrating the freeways controlled by the
TMC through metered ramps and showed slides to explain how traffic is managed.
He explained that Minneapolis /St. Paul has one of the largest traffic management
systems in the nation and that the entire metro area is controlled from the
control center located in downtown Minneapolis. MNDOT has been motivated to
install more ramp meters because of -the increasing volumes of and congestion on
the urban network at a time when transit ridership and ride sharing is declining.
Traffic management devices assist in unclogging freeways and reduce accidents.
Traffic detectors at one -half mile intervals along the freeway send information
to the computer which selects the metering rate. Most freeways are monitored by
closed circuit television at one mile spacing to watch for queuing problems and
to monitor traffic flow.
Mr. Carlson said the two key purposes of ramp control are: 1) to increase the
peak traffic volumes on the freeway (from 1800 vehicles per hour per lane to an
average of 2400 vehicles), and 2) to reduce accidents (typically by 408). It
also reduces congestion (stop and go traffic) and smooths out the merge by
preventing platoons surging onto the freeway. To promote ride sharing, bypass
ramps have been constructed so that buses and car poolers bypass the ramp queue.
More bypass ramps need to be added to the freeway system to assist emergency
vehicles. Ramp metering has also proven to be cost effective in relation to
personal injuries caused by accidents.
MNDOT has installed 30 motorist information boards in the metro area and also
operates a radio station in partnership with Minneapolis Public Schools (KBEM on
88.5 FM) giving traffic information. MNDOT has also implemented a highway helper
service which is part of the incident management plan to remove stalled vehicles,
has installed 108 TV cameras to monitor traffic, and currently has 300 metered
ramps already in operation.
Mr. Carlson closed his slide presentation by showing graphics illustrating
typical results of a ramp metering system as follows: 1) Average freeway speeds
go up by 358, 2) Accident reduction of 388 (150 to 200 accidents per year), 3)
Reduction in fuel consumption of one million gallons per year, and 4) Road user
benefits of one million dollars per year.
Mr. Carlson observed that, while ramp metering overall has been beneficial, there
are localized problems and complaints which they take seriously by going out in
the field, by monitoring on television, and by working on the timing. As to the
situation at T.H. 100 and 77th Street, Mr. Carlson said he hoped they are nearing
a solution by constant timing adjustments.
Member Rice asked if a fair summarization would be that, although it is an
annoyance to wait to enter a freeway, it is really safer and faster. Mr. Carlson
submitted that short trips on the freeway may take longer because of metering
than using an alternate route on local streets. However, ramp metering lessens
the chance of encountering a traffic jam downstream caused by an accident. MNDOT
has determined that about 808 of the freeway accidents are caused by congestion.
Member Kelly said her concern was whether Edina emergency vehicles could access
the freeway when two lanes of traffic are stacked at the ramp meter awaiting
entrance to the freeway. She asked if a single lane of traffic at that ramp
would help. Mr. Carlson said a single lane has been tried and the queuing got so
bad that traffic spilled back onto the local street. A bypass ramp may be the
answer, or another technique would be that, by a telephone call, radio message or
an electronic signal at the time the emergency vehicle rolls, the meter could be
programmed for rate one (the fastest rate) and after the emergency vehicle passes
the meter could be returned to the normal rate. MNDOT's design engineers could
work with the fire and police officials to determine the best solution.
Mayor Richards asked about the objective to divert traffic onto local streets.
Mr. Carlson commented that part of their program is to extend fiber optic
communications cable into a number of agencies (City of Minneapolis, Hennepin
County building) to coordinate local traffic signal systems with the ramp meters.
If freeway capacity can be increased to higher volumes then it would be
beneficial to local streets. Mayor Richards interjected that local streets are
being sacrificed now to make MNDOT's traffic management on the freeways look
good. Eastbound vehicles on the Crosstown Highway destined for the Radisson
South area are cutting off at Tracy Avenue to avoid the metered ramp at T.H. 100.
During the past year the Council has constantly received complaints from
residents about the traffic going through their neighborhoods. Personally, he
said he avoids the freeway for short trips because it is more expedient to use
the local streets and that many people do the same. Mayor Richards said MNDOT
has not spent enough time analyzing the impact ramp metering is having on local
neighborhoods and whether traffic is truly being diverted. Many Edina residents
would share that viewpoint while still recognizing the need to move traffic and
move it safely. Mr. Carlson answered that, since ramp metering was first started
some 10 -15 years ago, MNDOT continuously studied those kinds of problems. When
they did not occur, a level of confidence was developed over that period of time.
He agreed that they should have communicated with each Council and that they will
work with the City Engineer and other officials to look at the metering rates in
these areas.
Member Smith said he concurred with the comments of Mayor Richards. His own
experience has been, when coming off I -494 at Highway 62 at 5:00 P.M., that.
traffic is stopped when he reaches Highway 169. That is when the vehicles divert
to neighborhood streets. As MNDOT looks at the congestion at 77th Street the
plans should also include 70th Street as vehicles cannot get onto T.H. 100 going
south off of 70th Street because of the exit lane going to the Radisson area.
Member Smith added that nothing irritates him more than seeing the Highway 394
HOV lanes empty when it takes him 45 minutes to make a 12- minute trip. Regarding
access for emergency vehicles, he said this issue needs to be addressed now and
cannot wait for a by -pass ramp.
Member Rice said he felt there is a problem in communicating the benefits of ramp
metering to the public. If the statistics do show that ramp metering moves more
traffic safely and that is communicated to people, they will be less irritated
when waiting at metered ramps to access the freeways.
Mayor Richards reiterated that the ramp metering system is causing an adverse
impact on local municipalities and there needs to be more study and analysis to
see what solutions might exist as only part of the bigger picture is being
addressed. Mr. Carlson responded that MNDOT is not calloused towards the needs
of the local community. Project after project has been successful without
encountering this problem; now that it has appeared he concurred that it needs to
be resolved.
In conclusion, Mayor Richards thanked Mr. Carlson and Mr. Lau for the
presentation and acknowledged that they have a tough job. He urged them to
continue to work with City staff to resolve the problem.
ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AUTHORIZED - 'BROWNDALE /COUNTRY CLUB AREA Engineer
Hoffman reported that the City currently has a bridge feasibility study underway
concerning Browndale Bridge. Council had requested that staff provide
information on the cost to expand the Browndale Bridge feasibility review to
include traffic analysis over the entire Country Club District, including Maple
Road.
The scope of additional services to be provided after City staff has collected
all required field data would include:
1) Review existing conditions of the study area roadways and evaluate traffic
flow on these roadways.
2) Identify alternative actions and improvements.which would improve traffic
flow on the study area roadways including neighborhood input.
3) Review and evaluate the identified alternative actions and improvements,
and select for recommendations those actions best addressing needs within
the study area.
4) Prepare a draft report describing methodology, findings, conclusions and
recommendations and meet with City to review.
5) Finalize the traffic study report based on the review and comments of the
City and neighborhood.
6) Present the final report to City Council.
Engineer Hoffman added that the additional review would include use of a project
advisory committee made up of neighborhood residents with an overview by the
State Historical Society and local Heritage Preservation Board. Total costs for
the complete traffic analysis could reach $7,500 to $8,500. These funds would be
expended from the professional services line item in the 1993 Engineering
Department budget. The estimated costs reflect up to six neighborhood advisory
meetings and would involve State Historical Society individuals as necessary.
Member Rice made a motion to authorize funding up to $8,500.00 for additional
consultant services in conjunction with the Browndale Bridge feasibility study to
include a traffic analysis over the entire Country Club District and Maple Road.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Rice, Smith, Richards
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
CITY TO CO- SPONSOR 1993 CULTURAL EXPO Nancy Atchison, Human Relations Commission
Chair, announced that the 1993 Cultural Expo would be held March 7, 1993, from
3:00 to 7:00 P.M. at Valley View Middle.School. This is the fourth annual
cultural expo. The focus for 1993 will be directed toward more personal
interaction among the participants. She asked Council to support and be a co-
sponsor for the event along with the School District and The Edina Foundation.
Member Kelly made a motion that the City co- sponsor the 1993 Cultural Expo with
the Edina.School District and The Edina Foundation, to be held March 7, 1993.
Motion was seconded by Member Rica.
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
DATES DISCUSSED FOR COUNCIL/ADVISORY BOARDS ANNUAL DINNER MEETING: CONTINUED TO
12/21/92 Mayor Richards advised that for the past four years, the annual dinner
meeting with Advisory Boards and Commission members has been held in mid -March at
Braemar. Proposed dates for the event were March 16 or March 17, 1993. After a
brief discussion and the suggestion to alternate location with Centennial Lakes
Park Centrum, the matter was continued to December 21, 1992, for decision.
VOLUNTEERS RECOGNITION RECEPTION SET FOR 4/12/93 Mayor Richards advised that
dates suggested for the 15th Volunteer Recognition Reception are Tuesday, April
20 or Wednesday,.April 21, 1993, to be held at Edinborough Park.
Member Rice made a motion setting Wednesday, April 21, 1993, at 5:00 P.M. as the
date for the 15th Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception to be held at
Edinborough Park. Member Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
EDINA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS MEET CITY OFFICIALS DAY SET FOR 2127/93 Mayor
Richards recalled that at the.meeting of November 16, 1992, Council agreed to
accept the invitation from the Edina League of Women Voters to participate in a
public open house at which elected officials and City staff would have an
opportunity to talk about their role in providing City services. He asked the
Council Members to note that Saturday, February 27, 1993, has been sot for this
event.
*HEARING DATE OF 114/93 SET FOR VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (LOT 10
AND PART OF LOT 11, BLOCK 1. INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITIONO Notion was made by
Member Belly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined, after receipt of a petition of the owners
of land affected thereby, that the following described easement for utility and
drainage purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
That part of the drainage and utility easement over the southerly 5 feet of
Lot 10, and the northerly 5 feet of Lot 11, as dedicated in the plat of
INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, which lies west of the east 5 feet of Lots 10
and 11, and easterly of a line drawn at right angles from a point on the
south line of said Lot 10, distant 50.25 feet northeasterly of the
southwest corner of said Lot 10, as measured along said line, all in
Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
2. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street on
January 4, 1993 at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easement for drainage and utility purposes:
That part of the drainage and utility easement over the southerly 5 feet of
Lot 10, and the northerly 5 feet of Lot 11, as dedicated in the plat of
,INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, which lies west of the east 5 feet of Lots 10
and 11, and easterly of a line drawn at right angles from a point on the
south line of said Lot 10, distant 50.25 feet northeasterly of the
southwest corner of said Lot 10, as measured along said line, all in
Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area
of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation,
to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend
thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the
extent to which any or all of any such easement, and such authority to maintain,
and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella N. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
CONTINUED TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING TO BE HELD 12/9/92 Mayor Richards reminded
Council of the continued Truth in Taxation hearing scheduled for Wednesday,
December 9, 1992, when the 1993 Budget would be formally adopted.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR POSITION DISCUSSION CONTINUED 12121/92 Mayor Richards
suggested that discussion on -the traffic safety coordinator position be continued
to December 21, 1992, when Manager Rosland and Member Paulus would be in
attendance.
*12/30/92 SET FOR YEAR -END COUNCIL MEETING Motion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Rice setting Wednesday, December 30, 1992, at 5:00 P.M.
for the Year -End Council Meeting.
.Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED CANCELING LEVY FOR 1993 ON $5,400.000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT
BONDS, SERIES 1984, AND ON $2,200,000 G.O. REDEVELOPMENT'BONDS Notion was made
by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following
resolutions:
RESOLUTION CANCELING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1993 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal
and interest of its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984; said ad
valorem tax in the amount of $343,000 being collectible with and as a part of
other general taxes for the year 1993; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said
levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for
said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required
moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted September
10, 1984, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in
said City for the year 1993, be and hereby are canceled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be
authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and
to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1993.
ADOPTED this 7th day of December, 1992.
RESOLUTION CANCELING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1993 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal
and interest of its $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, said ad
valorem tax in the amount of $279,600 being collectible with and as a part of
other general taxes for the year 1993; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said
levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for
said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required
moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted November
3, 1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in
said City for the year 1993, be and hereby are canceled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be
authorised and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and
to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1993.
ADOPTED this 7th day of December, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the check register
dated December 2, 1992, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $338,278.34;
CDBG $3,045.00; Cable $15,232.69; Working Capital Fund $6,730.13; Art Center
$16,327.80; Pool $1,444.68; Golf Course $78,258.88; Arena $21,941.83; Gun Range
$747.75; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $42,423.59; Utilities $291,890.94; Storm
Sewer $1,737.03; Liquor $17,422.52; Construction Fund $9,528.11; TOTAL
$845,009.29.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT -CITY HALL
JULY 6, 1992 - 5:00 P.M.
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Mayor
Richards. Member Smith entered the meeting at 5:55 P.M.
1993 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS PRESENTED Manager Rosland stated that the purpose of
this special meeting was to consider a proposed 1993 Budget for the City of
Edina which must be certified to Hennepin County by September 15, 1993. For
1993 staff has proposed 14 budget assumptions, $228,000 of which is for
programs mandated by the State. In addition, staff estimated that $225,000 of
taxes levied (and budgeted for 1993) will not actually be collected due to
property appraisal abatements and consequences of the recession. It is also
expected that $30,000 in interest income will be lost due to lower interest
rates and the lower level of operating reserves. Finally,. the City will not
receive $20,000 in court fines because overdue parking tickets are
unenforceable and courts are sentencing people who commit large offenses to
community service rather than levying fines. These items combined total
$503,000 which is a 3.648 increase over 1992.
The following expenditure assumptions were presented:
1. Elections - The City will spend about $61,000 less than in 1992 because of
no elections.
2. Sales Tax - A sales tax of 6.58 was imposed upon local governments by the
1992 Legislature. It is estimated that the City will spend an additional
$170,000 in 1993 based upon 1991 actual expenditures that would have been
subject to this new tax if in effect then.
3. LMC /AMM Membership - If the Council decides to discontinue memberships in
the LMC /AMM $27,000 will be saved.
4. Fire Overtime - It is expected that in 1992 the Fire Department will spend
$100,000 more for overtime than has been budgeted. Staff would recommend that
$110,000 be budgeted so that extra overtime will not be spent as an unbudgeted
expense as in the past.
5. Police Overtime - Staff recommends that $35,000 be budgeted in extra
overtime for the Police Department.
6. Police Training (State Mandated) - The State has mandated that police
officers undergo additional training which will cost $30,000 in 1993.
7. Fire Training (State Mandated) - The State has mandated that firefighters
under additional training which will cost $18,000 in 1993.
8. Hazardous Waste Disposal - During 1993 the City will spend $10,000 more to
dispose of hazardous materials because of dumping fees and costs associated
with illegally dumped materials and highway chemical spills.
9. Replacement of Staff Reductions - In 1992 the Council approved a temporary
staff reduction (one street maintenance position, one engineering position,
one police position, two park maintenance positions and a number of parttime
street and park department positions). $175,000 would restore all positions;
$87,500 would restore half.of them.
10. Rebuild Reserve Operating Capital - During the last five years the City
has eroded its operating reserve. If not replenished, the City will have to
secure short -term loans to pay obligations before tax receipts are received.
This financing is estimated to cost $30,000 per.year and lost interest income
adds another $30,000 cost. In addition, bond rating companies will be more
likely to maintain the City's excellent bond rating if reserves are adequate.
Restoring reserves to a level of $1 Million by allocating $500,000 would
provide a prudent cushion. Allocating $320,000 would off -set the amount taken
from the general fund in 1991 to acquire land near Braemar for recycling
storage.
11. Flex Increase - Increasing City's contribution to the flexible benefits
program by $10 per year per fulltime permanent employee would cost $23,040.
12. Recycling Utility - If recycling costs were passed along to users total
general fund savings would be $159,000.
12B. Recycling Curbside - If recyclables were collected curbside savings could
reach $87,000.
14. SHeRPA/Human Relations - Human Relations Commission and the South Hennepin
Regional Planning Agency recommend an increase of $3,200 to cover operations
costs, each agency to receive about half.
The Council then discussed and debated the following issues: tax abatements,
percent of salary increase, philosophy of memberships in LMC /AMM, police /fire
overtime, mandated training programs, replacement of staff, reserve rebuild,
establishment of a recycling utility, and curbside pickup of recyclables.
The Council also requested further information on potential tax collection,
contractual services, mandatory training programs for police /fire and the
recycling budget.
It was the consensus of the Council that staff should prepare a preliminary
1993 Budget based on salary increase of 2.08, tax increase of 2.07% and
expenditures increase of 4.108.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. with no formal action taken.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
AUGUST 3, 1992 - 6:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
1993 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS REVISIONS PRESENTED Manager Rosland advised that data
relating to contractual services, mandatory training for both the Police and
Fire Departments and the recycling budget had been prepared in response to the
Council's request for'additional information at the meeting of July 6, 1992.
He reminded Council that a proposed 1993 Budget must be certified to Hennepin
County by September 15.
The proposed 1993 Budget was then presented assuming tax collection rate of
97.58 as follows: Total Revenues $14,749,488, Total Expenditures $14,749,488
(4.758 Increase), Tax Dollars $11,303,311, HACA Adjusted Levy $10,143,311, Tax
Dollar Increase $821,550 (3.238). Proposed total expenditures were based on
the following: salaries $7,664,259 (38), contractual services $1,930,671
(4.08), commodities $700,378 (4.08), central services $3,057,582 (4.58),
equipment 930,358 (1.08), and budget adjustments of $466,240. Proposed total
revenues were based on the following: taxes $11,328,311, licenses and permits
$801,633 (3.08), fees and charges $2,116,444 (3.08), intergovernmental aid
$503,100.
Three scenarios were presented for proposed budget adjustments, with
Scenario 3 reflecting the proposed budget and the comments of the Council at
the July 6, 1992 meeting:
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Revenue Decreases:
1.
Income on Investments
$ 30,000
$30,000
$30,000
2.
Court Fines
20,000
20,000
20,000
3.
1993 Tax Shortage
225,000
225,000
225,000
Expenditure Adjustments:
1.
Elections
(61,000)
(61,000)
(61,000)
2.
Sales Tax
170,000
170,000
170,000
3.
LMC /AMM Discontinue
(27,000)
(27,000)
0
4.
Fire OT
110,000
55,000
55,000
5.
Police OT
35,000
17,500
17,500
6.
Police Training (Mandate)
30,000
30,000
20,000
7.
Fire Training (Mandate)
18,000
18,000
12,000
8.
Hazardous Waste Disposal
10,000
10,000
10,000
9.
Staff Reduction
175,000
50,000
0
10.
Rebuild Reserve
500,000
250,000
100,000
11.
Flex Increase
23.040
23.040
23.040
Subtotal
$756,040
$381;040
$165,040
12A.Recycling
Utility
(159,000)
12B.Recycling
Curbside
(69,000)
12C.Recycling
Status Quo
20,000
0
13.
SHHS/Human Relations
3.700
3.700
3.700
Total Adjustments
$1,281,740
$745,240
$466,240
Considerable discussion followed on establishment of the recycling utility and
on the recycling budget in general. Discontinuing memberships in the 1,MC /AMM
was also considered.
Member Smith then made a motion directing staff to proceed to draft the 1993
Budget document as proposed for a total of $14,749,488, representing a 3.2%
tax dollar increase and a 4.75% increase in expenditures. Motion was seconded
by Member Kelly:
Rollcall•
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards adjourned the meeting at 7:55 P.M.
City Clerk
HIlQUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 - 5:00 P.H.
ROLLCAL . Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Mayor
Richards.
DRAFT 1993 BUDGET PRESENTED AND REVIEWED Manager Rosland presented the draft
1993 Budget for the City of Edina for review by the Council. As to process,
Mayor Richards suggested that formal action on the proposed 1993 Budget be
taken at the regular meeting on September' 8, 1992 so that the tax levy can be
certified to Hennepin County -by September 15, 1992. He further suggested that
the review focus on proposed expenditures with comment by advisory board and
commission members who were present.
Human Relations Commission - Nancy Atchison, HRC Chair, explained that the
Human Relations Commission budget process began when it received seven
requests for 1993 funding. Work groups studied and investigated the proposals
in preparation for a hearing on July 14 at which the agencies presented their
proposals. Following the hearing, the Commission met to deliberate the
funding requests and would recommend that the City Council fund the following:
Storefront/Youth Action $36,300, Senior Community Services $6,700, Cornerstone
Advocacy Service $4000, Share -A -Home $2350, United Battered Families Network
$2550, VEAP $3950, West Suburban Mediation Center $1150, Projects /Planning
$2000, Continuing Education /Dues & Subscriptions /Chemical Health /Education
Program $1400, and South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency $12,900.
Mrs. Atchison pointed out that the.$2,000 for Projects /Planning is a set -aside
fund for special projects which may come up during the year. Mayor Richards
suggested that the $2,000 be moved to the contingencies budget so that the
Council may review any projects not in the HRC budget.
Recycling and Solid Waste Commission - Ardythe Buerosse, RSWC Chair, said the
Commission would recommend the following:
- Retain Woodlake as the residential recycling hauler
- Obtain a three year contract
- Add mixed mail to the collection in May of 1993
- Go with curbside placement of recyclables
- Put the net recycling cost on the utility bill
In response to Mayor Richards, Coordinator Chandler said the difference in
cost between garage pickup versus curbside would be $59,154. Manager Rosland
reminded the Council that the key issue is the proposal to remove the
recycling budget from the general fund budget and to place those costs on the
utility bills effective January 1, 1993.
Review of Proposed 1993 Budget - Following testimony by commissions members
the Council began review and discussion of the proposed 1993 Budget by area
and function including the following: Central Services - Includes general and
administrative expenses for the City which are allocated to operating
departments and other funds according to usage; General Government - Mayor 6
Council, Administration, Planning, Finance, Election, Assessing, Legal b Court
Services; Public Works - Administration, Engineering, Supervision, Street
Maintenance, Street Lighting, Traffic & Street Name Signs, Traffic Control,
Bridges /Guard Rails, Retaining Walls, Sidewalks/Ramps /Parking Lots; Public
Safety Police Protection, Civilian Defense, Animal Control, Fire Protection,
Public Health, Inspections; Park & Recreation - Administration, Recreation,
Park Maintenance.
The meeting was declared adjourned at 6:32 p.m. with no formal action taken.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 30, 1992 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING HELD FOR PROPOSED 1993 CITY BUDGET Pursuant
to published notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the proposed
property tax increase in the 1993 Budget for the City of Edina, as mandated by
truth in taxation legislation.
Mayor Richards- stated that the focus of the hearing would be on the proposed
City Budget for 1993 and the expenditures Council has determined necessary to
run local government. Residents with questions or objections to the market
value of their homes should appear before the Board of Review which will meet
on April 12, 1993.
Presentation of 1993 Budget Summary
Mayor Richards stated that the 1993 Budget proposes total expenditures of
$14,471,815 with an increase in spending from 1992 of 4.78 and an increase in
tax revenues of 2.978. Expenditures by type: salaries 53.7 %, central services
21.28, contractual services 12.48, equipment 7.08, commodities 5.08 and
reserve 0.78. Expenditures by area: public safety 47.18, public works 23.88,
general government 13.98, parks 12.48 and non departmental 2.88.
Major changes since 1992 Budget include: 38 wage increase plus $10 /month
increase in health insurance; $72,500 increase in overtime budgets for Police
Department and Fire Department; $100,000 increase in reserves; no new
programs; seven staff positions vacated in 1992 will not be filled in 1993.
Major sources of City revenues: taxes 76.88, fees and charges 14.38, licenses
and permits 5.48 and intergovernmental'aid 3.58. For 1993, $212,000 will be
spent on programs mandated by the State of Minnesota coupled with the loss of
sales tax exemptions by all cities. Mayor Richards then called for public
comment on the proposed 1993 Budget.
Public Comment
Edward Kaisler, 6216 Rolf Avenue, asked about the impact of the class rate on
home value. Mayor Richards explained that the State Legislature is phasing
out the 38 class rate for higher valued homes. The current class rates for
owner- occupied housing are 18 for the first $72,000 of market value and 28 for
market value in excess of $72,000. As a consequence lower valued homes will
assume a larger share of the tax burden in 1993. Homes valued at more than
$260,000 may receive a tax reduction in 1993 due to the reduction in class
rates. With regard to the proposed $10 /month increase in health benefits,
Mr. Kaisler suggested that City employees pick up a greater proportion of the
cost just as is being done in private industry.
Frederick Koehn, 5428 Brookview Avenue, commented that, although the proposed
1993 Budget is an increase of 4.78 his taxes are going up 17.98 and on a fixed
income that is unreal and unjust.
rw
Will Merrill, 4905 West 66th Street, asked: 1) what controls will be placed on
expenditure of the reserve fund, and 2) why the large increases in the Police
Department budget. Mayor Richards responded that the Council controls the
reserve and makes the final decision on all spending.. Four expenditure items
comprise the majority of the increase in police services: $17,500 for overtime
to more accurately, reflect costs, $20,000 for mandated training, $110,000 for
sales tax liability in commodities and equipment replacement, and $20,000
added above the normal central services increase.
Douglas Miller, 6436 Red Fox Court, suggested that in the future all State
mandated program costs be listed separately so that some of those could be
preempted.
John Maloney, 4400 Curve Avenue, asked why expenditures and profits for
Braemar Golf Course, the new golf course, Edinborough Park and Centennial
Lakes do not show in the budget. Mayor Richards said that those are
proprietary enterprises which are run like a private business and are not part
of the general fund budget. He then explained in some detail how those are
operated. Mr. Maloney recalled that two years ago at a similar hearing he had
mentioned that there was waste in the Fire Department of which he is an
employee. Specifically, he challenged the salary paid to the Fire Chief when
compared to the salary paid to the Minneapolis Fire Chief. He said that a
group of citizens have made a study of the Fire Department and have made a
number of recommendations concerning the Fire Chief. Member Smith interjected
that this is a Truth in Taxation hearing and that the Council is not here to
receibe a report from the citizens' task force.
Paul Green, 6945 Southdale Road, commented that.he felt the Council has done
an exception job in running the City. He added that he would like to be
assured that the entire City is assessed equally at 100% value. He then
would like to see the City compared to the rest of the county to make sure
Edina is not contributing more than its fair share to Hennepin County and to
the State of Minnesota.
Hans Kuhlman, 5104 Halifax Avenue, mentioned he had just entered the meeting
and said his notice indicated his property tax would go up 108 for the City
portion. The budget facts sheet stated that taxes need to increase by 2.978
to support the 1993 City Budget. He asked what makes up the difference.
Mayor Richards responded that, as explained earlier, the property tax has
increased because of the different tax capacity rate established by the State
Legislature.
Marjorie Ruedy, 5048 Edinbrook Lane, observed that revenues from false alarm
calls and ambulance services go into the general fund. She felt the same
should apply to profits from the enterprises (Braemar, Edinborough, Centennial
Lakes, etc.).
Kate Donnelly Schneider, 6505 Biscayne Boulevard, spoke to her concern that
the Park Department had recommended suspending the bus service for the
swimming program because there are not enough riders. She said many families
need this service and urged the Council to continue the bus transportation.
Park and Recreation Director Kojetin explained that the total cost for the
swim program was $28,987 and that the revenue was only $20,000. He added that
bus service for the swim program is included in the 1993 Budget but that the
service is being analyzed because the average usage is 8 -10 students per bus
per session.
Dan Peterson, 5616 Sherwood Avenue, said that each year the budget shows that
expenditures exceed revenues.. He asked how that gets reflected in the next
year's budget and if the amount budgeted for 1993 is enough. Mayor Richards
responded that this is reflected in the annual audit as uncommitted surplus
which currently is approximately $500,000.
Richard Dahlstrom said he is president of the LeChataignier Condominiums
Board, 7200 Cahill Road, and represented 52 people, 808 of which are retired.
Interest on their investments has gone down in the last four years, social
security does not pick the difference, expenses are going.up and they are
biting the bullet. He said.he wanted to make sure that the Council and City
employees are biting the bullet like they are.
Thomas Brennan, 7013 Mark Terrace Drive, asked what the cumulative reserve
is at currently. Finance Director Wallin responded that it is a little over
$500,000; historically it has been a little over one Million. Mr. Brennan
also asked if the example extension rate of 123.3308 in the budget facts sheet
would apply to all homes. Assistant Manager Hughes the 123.3308 rate is an
average but it would vary somewhat depending upon which school district the
home was located in. Mr. Brennan said they have lived here for 24 years,
having moved from Pennsylvania and cannot think of a better place to live.
Although he concurred with some of the comments that have been made, he
commended the City for the outstanding services, i.e. police, fire, parks.
No further public comment being heard, Mayor Richards declared the hearing
concluded. He suggested that, in order to reflect on the comments made, that
final action on adoption of the 1993 Budget be continued to December 9, 1992.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the matter of adoption of the 1993
Budget to December 9, 1992, 7:00 P.M. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards asked that staff bring back additional information on the
following issues: increases in police and fire budgets, expanded hearing
notices, Park and Recreation swim program and Fire Department salaries.
Mayor Richards then declared the meeting adjourned at 8:35 P.M.
City Clerk
i
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:00 P.H.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING CONCLUDED Mayor Richards stated that this was a
reconvened meeting of the Truth in Taxation hearing to solicit further public
comment on the proposed 1993 Budget following which the 1993 Budget would be
adopted.
It was noted that written comments had been received from Amy Lake, 5713 Ewing
Avenue South; Carl and Monica Schmitt, 5737 Zenith Avenue South; Celest
Phillips, 6008 Zenith Avenue South; Lorraine Cunningham, 6305 Maloney Avenue;
Holly Johnson, 6805 Oaklawn Avenue; C. R. Larson, 4116 West 62nd Street;
Clarence and Gwethalyn Guldberg, 7250 Lewis Ridge; Ann Struthers, 4604 West
56th Street; Michael Gottsacker, 6400 Wilryan Avenue; Josephine Hornung, 6309
York Avenue South; Jeffrey Upin, 5317 Ayrshire Boulevard; Robert Jepson, 6208
Parkwood Road; Elaine and Roger Sampson, 7751 Shaughnessy Road; Georgia
Shannon, 4101 Parklawn Avenue; Celeste Lorimer, 6109 Ryan Avenue; James Dow,
6125 Birchcrest Drive; Eleanor McIntosh, 5044 Kent Avenue South; and Daniel
Peterson, 5616 Sherwood Avenue.
In response to issues raised at the November 30, 1992, Truth in Taxation
hearing, staff had prepared a memorandum with further information on the
following: Increases in Police and Fire budgets, Truth in Taxation Notices,
Park and Recreation Swim Program and Fire Department salaries. Mayor Richards
then called for further public comment.
Public Comment
David Turk, 5500 Park Place, stated that his property taxes have increased 70%
since 1989, his house valuation has gone up 27 %, each year the budget has been
increased 3 -48 and he asked when it would stop. Mayor Richards responded that
the City portion increase has been within one or two percent of inflation.
The proposed increase for 1993 includes $212,000 on programs mandated by the
State of Minnesota, which includes sales tax now imposed on all cities. As to
the market value of his home, Mayor Richards encouraged Mr. Turk to contact
the City Assessor or appear at the Board of Review Meeting on April 12, 1993.
No further public comment being heard, Mayor Richards declared the Truth in
Taxation hearing on the proposed 1993 Budget closed.
1993 CITY OF EDINA BUDGET ADOPTED Member Paulus then introduced the following
resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1993, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1993 PAYABLE IN 1993
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1993 is
hereby adopted as hereinafter set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated
therefor.
4
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$ (200,000)
Licenses and Permits
Mayor and Council
$ 61,270
475,000
Administration
600,464
Other
Planning
228,349
380,000
Finance
359,260
Aid - Other Agencies
Election
31,049
220,000
Assessing
390,940
Legal and Court Services
343,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$ '2,014,332
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration
$ 123,344
-Engineering
444,061
Highways
2,882,968
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$ 3,450,373
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
Police
$3,837,519
Civilian Defense
28,894
Animal Control
54,466
Fire
2,274,682
Public Health
337,925
Inspection
278,841
TOTAL PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
$ 6,812,327
PARR DEPARTMENT
Administration
$ 406,922
Recreation
124,630
Maintenance
1,258,181
TOTAL PARR DEPARTMENT
$ 1,789,733
NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
Reserve Rebuild
$ 100,000
Contingencies
62,000
Special Assessments on City Property
45,000
Capital Plan Appropriation
117,000
Commissions and Special Projects
81,050
TOTAL NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
$ 405,050
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
,$ 14,471,815.
Section 2. Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby proposed
as hereinafter set forth:
GENERAL FUND
Other Taxes
$ (200,000)
Licenses and Permits
777,100
Municipal Court Fines
475,000
Department Service Charges
969,000
Other
192,500
Transfer from Liquor Fund
380,000
Income on Investments
50,000
Aid - Other Agencies
283,100
Police Aid
220,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS
$ 3,146,700
r
Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and
personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the
amounts hereinafter set forth:
FOR GENERAL FUND $11.325.115
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
-1993 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES APPROVED Member Smith moved approval of the
Schedule of Proposed 1993 Fees and Charges, dated November 30, 1992, as
presented and on file in the office of the Finance Director. Motion was
seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -2 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING (AMENDING CITY CODE BY ADDING A
NEV SECTION 716 - RECYCLING SERVICE CHARGES Member Smith moved adoption of
Ordinance No. 1992 -2 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY
ADDING A NEW SECTION 716
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended to provide anew Section 716
as follows:
"SECTION 716 - RECYCLING SERVICE CHARGES
716.01. Purpose. The rates and charges established by this Section are for
the purpose of paying costs for the operation and administration of recycling
services provided by the City.
716.02. Recycling Charges.
Subd. 1. Classifications. The Council may classify recycling charges
according to land use and density. All classifications shall be as set
forth in Section 185 of this Code.
716.03. Billing and Payment. Recycling charges shall be payable by the
owner, lessee, or occupant of each property to which recycling services are
made available by the City pursuant to'Subd. 1, of Subsection 715.04 of this
Code. Recycling charges shall be computed every three months and included as
a charge on bills issued by the City for water or sever services pursuant to
Section 1100 of this Code. If the property subject to recycling charge is not
served by City water or sewer, a separate bill shall be issued to the owner of
the property every three months for the recycling charge. All provisions for
the billing, payment, notice, and collection of delinquent accounts pursuant
to Subsections 1100.04 and 1100.05 of this Code shall apply to charges made
pursuant to this Section."
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and shall take effect
on January 1, 1993.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall•
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -4 ADOPTED (AMENDING EDINA CODE SECTION 185 SCHEDULE A TO
INCREASE CERTAIN FEES AND TO ADD CERTAIN FEES): SECOND READING VAIVED
Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 1992 -4 and moved its adoption as
follows, with waiver of Second Reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 1992 -4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CODE SECTION 185 SCHEDULE A
TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES AND TO ADD CERTAIN FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section
185 are amended to read as follows:
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
410 410.02 Reinspection fee assessed $31.00 per hr or the total 38
Subd.l under provisions of UBC, hourly cost to City,
Section 305 (g) whichever is greatest.
410 410.02 Building Code compliance $ 78.00 per hr Residential 39
Subd.l inspection $155.00 per hr Commercial 40
415 415.02 Permit for moving building $206.00
415 415.02 Indemnity deposit for $515.00, unless licensed by
Subd.3 damages sustained by Commissioner of Transpor-
moving of building tation
430 430.03 Oil burner installer's $52.00
Subd.8 license, stoker installer's
license, steam or hot water
heating installer's license,
mechanical warm air heating
and air conditioning-
installer's license,
refrigeration installer's
license
430 430.03 Gas piping installer's
Subd.8 license
435 435.05 Gas piping permit
$ 0 - $ 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 25,000
25,001 - 50,000
50,001 and over
* plus
435 435.07 Oil burner, stoker, steam
or hot water heating,
$52.00
Fee Calculations:
*$ 14.00 +2.80%> $ 500.00
* 28.00+2.30%> 1,000.00
* 120.00 +2.05%> 5,000.00
* 223.00 +1.80%> 10,000.00
* 493.00 +1.60%> 25,000.00 .
* 892.00 +1.25%> 50,000.00
surcharge pursuant to H.S. 16B.
45
46
55
56
62
63
64
65
66
67
70
mechanical warm air heating
and air conditioning or
refrigeration permit
All fees for above permits based on contract price as follows:
$ 0 - $ 1,000.00 *$ 14.00 +2.80% of anything over $ 500.00
1,001.00 - 5,000.00 * 28.00 +2.30% of anything over 1,000.00
5,001.00 - 10,000.00 * 120.00 +2.05% of anything over 5,000.00
10,001.00 - 25,000.00 * 223.00 +1.80% of anything over 10,000.00
25,001.00 - 50,000.00 * 493.00 +1.60% of anything over 25,000.00
50,001.00 and over * 892.00 +1.25% of anything over 50,000.00
* plus surcharge pursuant to H.S. 163.70
450 450.27 Public or semi - public $280.00 per annum for each
Subd.4 swimming pool license pool enclosed part or all of
the year
$150.00 per annum for each
outdoor pool
450 450.27 Public or semi - public
Subd.4 whirlpool bath or
therapeutic swimming
pool license
620 620.04
625 625.04
Permit fee for cleaning
of commercial cooking
ventilation system
Sprinkler permit fees:
Number of Heads
$ 70.00 per annum for each
bath or pool
$50.00 for each permit
70
71
72
73
74
75
81
82
83
105
110
1
- 5
*$ 40.00 (minimum fee)
6
- 10
* 65.00
11
- 20
* 85.00
21
- 30
* 105.00
31
- 40
* 125.00
41
- 50
* 145.00
51
- 60
* 160.00
61
- 70
* 175.00
71
- 80
* 190.00
81
- 90
* 205.00
91
- 100
* 215.00
101
- 110
* 225.00
111
- 120
* 235.00
121
- 130
* 245.00
131
- 140
* 254.00
141
- 150
* 263.00
151
- 160
* 272.00
161
- 170
* 281.00
171
- 180
* 289.00
181
- 190
* 297.00
191
- 200
* 305.00
201
plus
* 305.00 for first 200 plus $6.00
for each additional head
* plus surcharge pursuant to H.S.16B.70
625 625.03 Fire pump installation $78.00 118
and associated hardware
Standpipe installation $78.00 119
Each additional standpipe $ 6.00 120
635 635.02 False fire alarm $200.00 for the third and 125
each subsequent.response
within one calendar year
720 720.04 Food establishment
Subd.3 license
Day care, limited
food establishment
license
Take -out food facility
license
Packaged food sales
license
Food warehouse license
Catering food
establishment license
Itinerant food
establishment license
Potentially hazardous
food vehicle license
Fleet of 5-or more
potentially hazardous
food vehicles license
720 720.04 Catering food vehicle
Subd.3 license
Food vehicle license
Fleet of 5 or more
food vehicles license
810 810.09 Plat and subdivision
filing fee
$390.00 per affium, $340.00 if 135
certified pursuant to
Subsection 720.04; Subd. 3C of
this Code, plus $105.00 per
annum for each additional
facility
$120.00 per annum 136
$260.00 per annum, $210.00 if 137 -
certified pursuant to
Subsection 720.04, Subd. 3C of
this Code
$125.00 per annum 138
$65.00 per annum 139
$390.00 per annum, $340.00 if 140
certified pursuant to
Subsection 720.04, Subd.3C of
this Code, plus $105.00 per
annum for each additional
facility
$65.00 per event 141
$75.00 per annum 143
$350.00 per annum 144
$145.00 per annum, plus 145
$25.00 per annum for each
additional vehicle
$70.00 per annum 146
$350.00 per annum 147
For all other plats and 162
subdivisions (new buildable
lots):
$350.00 plus $50.00 per lot
850 850.04
Fee for transfer of land
$350.00 for (one) 8 -2 lot
192
Subd.2A2
to another zoning
$500.00 for (two) 8 -2 lots
193
district
$650.00 for all other
194
transfers
900 900.06
Non - intoxicating malt..
Subd.l
liquor licenset
On -sale
$200.00 per annum (renewal)
207
$255.00 per annum (new) 208
900 900.04 Off -sale $200.00 per annum (renewal) 209
Subd.2 $255.00 per annum (new) 210
900 900.16 On -sale wine license Per year - restaurants with:
Subd.l 50 or fewer seats - $660.00 212
51 - 100 seats. inclusive $715.00 213
101 - 150 seats. inclusive $770.00 214
Over 150 seats $825.00 215
1100 1100.03 Water service: 1. $0.50 per 100 cubic feet for 242
Subd.2 areas of City, except areas
described in 2. and 3.
2. $1.20 per 100 cubic feet for 243
Morningside area
3. $1.20 per 100 cubic feet for 244.
east side of Beard Av from West
54th St to Fuller St and both
sides of Abbott P1 from West 54th
St to Beard Av
Minimum charge of $8.00 per quarter 245
where water consumption amounts to
less than 1600 cubic feet
1105 1105.01 Service $750.00 per SAC unit x umber of 250
Subd.l Availability SAC units computed pursuant to
Charge (SAC) Subsection 1105.01, Subd. 1 of
this Code
1300 1300.02 Refuse or recycling $115.00 per annum for first vehicle 270
Subd.l hauler license $45.00 for each additional vehicle
Section 2. Schedule A to Section 185 is hereby amended by adding the
following fees thereto:
410 410.02 Residential building $5.00 surcharge pursuant to 41
Subd.3 contractor, remodeler M.S. 326.86
or specialty
contractor license
verification
716 716.02 Recycling:
Single Family $3.85 per quarter 131
Double Bungalow $3.85 per quarter 132
Apartments /Condos $1.95 per quarter 133
(2 -8 units)
Section 3. Following publication, the effective date of this Ordinance
shall be January 1, 1993.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED SETTING PARR & RECREATION FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1993 Member
Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption,.
RESOLUTION SETTING PARK & RECREATION DEPASTMERT
FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1993
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following Fees and Charges for
the year 1993, as submitted by the Park Board, be approved:
PARR & RECREATION:
Playground $10.00
Tennis Instruction $27.00
Aquatic Instruction $35.00
Pee Wes Tennis $17.00
Coach Pitch $25.00
Team Tennis $33.00
ART CENTER:
Memberships
Family
$35.00
Individual
$25.00
Class Fees (based on number of hrs in
class)
Non- Mem/Mem
24 hrs
$3.35 / 3.10
21 hrs
$3.60 / 3.35
20 hrs
$3.60 / 3.35
18 hrs
$3.60 / 3.35
16 hrs
$3.60 / 3.35
14 hrs
$3.85 / 3.60
12 hrs
$4.10 /,3.67
10 hrs
$4.10 / 3.70
9 hrs
$4.10 / 3.67
8 hrs
$4.35 / 3.87
6 hrs
$4.35 / 3.83
(all clay and children's classes add
$5)
Parent /Child Workshops
(includes 1 child & 1 adult)
Pon- Mem/Mem
90 min.
$15 / $13
2 hours
$17 / $15
3 hours
$21 / $19
4 hours
$27 / $25
.5 hours
$31 / $28
6 hours
$34 / $31
7 hours
$39 / $35
8 hours
$42 / $38
(all pottery workshops add $5)
ARENA:
Single Hour Rate (as of Sept.)
$96.00
Open Skating (Youth & Adult)
$ 2.50
Skate Rental
$ 1.25
Skate Sharpening
$ 2.50
Season.Tickets (Effective 10/1/93)
Resident Family:
First 2 members
$50.00
Each additional member
$ 5.00
Maximum
$75.00
Resident Individual
$40.00
Pon- Resident Family
First 2 members $65.00
Each additional member $ 5.00
MA:im"M $90.00
Non- Resident Individual $50.00
Classes $50.00
GUN RANGE:
Pistol 1/2 hour $ 5.00
25 rounds trap $ 4.75
Building/hr $45.00
Firearm Safety $ 6.00
POOL:
Daily Admission
$ 5.00
Resident Family:
Non- Resident Family:
First 2 members
$45.00
First 2 members
$ 65.00
Each additional member
$10.00
Each additional member
$ 10.00
Maximum
$95.00
Maximum
$105.00
Resident Individual:
$40.00
Non - Resident Individual:
$ 60.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
Patron Cards:
Lockers:
Individual
$55.00
Men's 72"
$35.00
Executive Course
$25.00
Men's 42"
$25.00
Computerized Handicaps:
Ladies' 72"
$15.00
Resident
$14.00
Club Rental
$ 6.00
Non - Resident
$19.00
Pull Carts
$ 2.00
Golf Cars:
Golf Range:
18 holes
$20.00
Large Bucket
$ 4.50
9 holes
$11.00
Small Bucket
$ 3.00
Group Golf Lessons:
Warm -up Bucket
$ 1.50
Adult
$53.00
Junior
$26.00
BRAEMAR GREEN FEES:
Green Fees:
Green Fees - Seniors:
18 hole /non - patron
$16.50
18 hole /patron
$13.00
18 hole /patron
$13.50
9 hole /patron
$ 7.75
9 hole /non- patron
$ 9.75
Group Golf Lessons:
9 hole /patron
$ 8.25
Adult
$53.00
Group Fees
$22.00
Junior
$26.00
Group Fees - 9 hole
$13.00
Group Car Fees
$26.00
BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE GREEN FEES:
Adult /non - patron
$ 7.00
Golf Cars /all
$ 9.00
Adult /patron
$ 6.00
Pull Carts
$ 1.75
Jr non- patron
$ 6.00
Group Fees
$ 9.00
Sr & Jr patron $ 5.00
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE:
Braemar Boom
Night Rate /rest. $600.00
Non -resi. $650.00
Other events $250 - $650
Concession Fees Variable prices
(Concession is an annual increase of 5 %, as a general rule)
GOLF DOME:
Large Bucket $ 5.00 Soccer rental/hour $ 95.00
Sr. Bucket $ 4.75 League $525.00
Time Golf 1/2 hoar $ 7.50
EDINBOROUGH•
Daily Passes $ 3.00
Season Passes:
Edina Family
First 2 members $195.00
Each additional member $ 15.00
Maximum $270.00
Edina Individual $180.00
Non -Edina Family
First 2 members $215.00
Each additional member $ 20.00
Maximum $315.00
Non -Edina Individual $195.00
Towel Fee $ .75
Skate Rental Fee $ 1.50
Domestic Photography by Professionals.(per
hoar)
Any park area requiring barricades
$ 50.00
Grotto
$ 50.00
Theater
$ 75.00
Great Hall
$ 75.00,-,_
Ice.Rink
$100.00
Commercial Photography by Professional
(per hour)
Any park area requiring barricades
$150.00
Grotto
$150.00
Theater
$200.00
Great Hall
$300.00
Ice Rink
$300.00
Mixed Use
$500.00
Commercial Use, i.e.(Trade Shows) $2,500.00
Building Rentals
Category 1: City of Edina b Boards /Associations
$150 /day+$12 /man - set -up /down
Category 2: Edina Civic Organizations
& Edina Schools (M -Th)
Great Hall
$ 125.00
Theatre
$ 50.00
Grotto
$ 25.00
Category 3: Edina Residents & Businesses (per hoar)
Great Hall
$ 300.00
Grotto
$ 75.00
Theatre
$ 125.00
Category 4: Non -Edina Residents & Business
(per hoar)
Great Hall
$ 350.00
Grotto
$ 125.00
Theatre
$ 150.00
Category 5: Exclusive Rentals
Friday Nights
$1300.00
Saturday Nights
$1500.00
Rental Amenities:
Banners
$ 75.00
Cover over ice rink
$ 125.00
CENTENNIAL LAKES:
Rentals:
Radio Control Boats $3.00/half hr Paddle Boat $3.00/half hr
Winter Sled $3.00/hour
Ice Skate $1.25 /per pair
Centrum Building Rental:
Monday thru Thursday & *Sunday (day)
Half Day Rental - Half Room
$ 100.00
Half Day - Full Room
$ 200.00
Full Day Rental - Half Room
$ 200.00
Full Day Rental - Full Room
$ 400.00
Friday'- Day Rental Only
Half Day Rental - Half Room $ 100.00
Half Day Rental - Full Room $ 200.00
Veakend Banquet Rental Fees (6:00 P.M. - 1:00 A.M.)
Friday Evening $ 500.00
Saturday Evening $ 500.00
Sunday Evening $ 500.00
*Sum. afternoon rental not available if there is a Sun. evening rental
PARR DEPARTMENT RENTALS:
General Park Areas: $ 50/hr - commercial use (i.e. TV Commercials)
Picnic Shelters:
Showmobile:
Athletic Field Rental:
Associations
Residents/Non- Residents:
Arneson Acres Terrace Room
Tupa Park, Cahill School,
Grange Hall
$100/hr with lights
$ 70 /group at Lake Cornelia Park
$700 /day
(Baseball, Softball, Football, Soccer)
Cost — Expenses (includes overhead)
Per Day - $100 /per field /per day plus expenses
Per Hour - $ 35 /per field /per hour
$ 55 /per field /per hour with lights
$125 /day ($50 1st hour minimum, $25/hr after)
$125 /day ($50 1st hour minimum, $25/hr after)
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1993 Member Kelly introduced the
following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1993
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the
following ambulance service fees for 1993:
AMBULANCE FEES
Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or
transportation to a medical facility:
Level I - On Scene Treatment
Specialized medical services
with no transport involved
Level II - Minor Care (BLS)
Vital Signs
Splinting
Bandaging, etc.
Level III - Moderate Care (ALS)
I.V. Setups
ERG Monitoring
Spine Immobilization
Level IV - Maior Care
performed at scene
Level III plus any: Medications
MAST (inflated)
Additional Manpower
Mechanical Extrication
Level V - Cardiac Arrest
Level IV plus any: Cardio Pulmonary
Resuscitation (CPR)
Defibrillation
Additional Charge for Transportation
to Downtown Hospitals
Abbott / Northwestern, Minneapolis Children's
Medical Center, Metropolitan Mt. Sinai,
Fairview Riverside, Fairview Ridges Medical
$ 100.00
$ 330.00
$ 400.00
$ 460.00
$ 525.00
$ 80.00
Center, Hennepin County Medical Center,
University of Minnesota, North Memorial Medical
Center, Veterans' Administration
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,_Richards
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 1993 Member Smith introduced
the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 1993
BE IT RESOLVED that.the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the
following miscellaneous fees for 1993:
HAZARDOUS MATERTA7S /SPILLS RESPONSE
Engine/Fire Company $150.00 per hour /2 hour minimum
HazMat Unit $330.00 per hour.
Specialized Personnel $ 50.00 per hour /2 hour minimum
Specialized Equipment Cost + 10% administrative charge
Supplies Cost + 10% administrative charge
Disposal Cost + 10% administrative charge
Other City Resources Cost + 10% administrative charge
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 7:40 P.M.
City Clerk
A.
o e
Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: December 21, 1992
Subject: S-92-1, Preliminar
Plat Approval -
Dalauist Addition
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -1J..
A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends [❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Plat Approval
subject to the following conditions:
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Developers Agreement
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Executed and Recorded Conservation Easement
5. Installation of coniferous landscaping along southerly
property line to screen new driveway from Golub house.
INFO /BACKGROUND
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans.
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 2, 1992
5 -92 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Dalquist Addition
Lot 11, Auditorls Subdivision No. 325
CDS Partners, Inc.
The Commission will recall considering the proposed
subdivision at its October 28, 1992, meeting. The Commission voted
to recommend denial of the preliminary plat that proposed a
variance to the required conservation easement for Lot 3. The City
Council denied the preliminary plat at their November 16, 1992,
meeting.
The proponents have returned with a revised preliminary plat
for Commission review. The revised plat continues to show five
lots, four new lots are located on the northerly portion of the
property between the two ponds. Lot sizes and dimensions remain
unchanged, as does the new street serving the lots. The only
change is an adjustment of the conservation easement on Lot 3.
That easement has been increased to 100 feet as required by the
subdivision ordinance. All four new lots now provide a 100 foot
conservation easement.
Recommendation:
The revised preliminary plat is now presented with no
variances. Thus, staff recommends approval with the following
conditions.
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Developers Agreement
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Executed and recorded conservation easement
5. Installation of coniferous landscaping material adjacent
to driveway on Lot 5 to provide screening for adjacent
property (Golub House).
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21 1992
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, R. Hale, N. Faust, L.
Johnson, H. McClelland, D. Runyan, J. Palmer,
V. Shaw, G. Workinger, C. Ingwalson, D. Byron
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Commissioner McClelland moved approval of the minutes.
Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion
carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
S -92 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Dalquist Addition
Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 325
CDS Partners, Inc.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall at the October 28,
1992, meeting, the Commission voted to recommend denial of the
preliminary plat that proposed a variance to the required
conservation easement for Lot 3. The City Council denied the
preliminary plat at their November 16, 1992, meeting.
Mr. Larsen explained the proponents have returned with a
revised preliminary plat for Commission review. The revised plat
continues to show five lots, four new lots are located on the
northerly portion of the property between the two ponds. Lot sizes
and dimensions remain almost unchanged, as does the new street
serving the lots. The only change is an adjustment of the
conservation easement on Lot 3. That easement has been increased
to 100 feet as required by the subdivision ordinance. All four new
lots now provide a 100 foot conservation easement.
Mr. Larsen concluded the revised preliminary plat is now
presented with no variances. Thus, staff recommends approval with
1
the following conditions.
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Developers Agreement
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Executed and recorded conservation easement
5. Installation of coniferous landscaping material adjacent
to driveway on Lot 5 to provide screening for adjacent
property (Golub House).
The proponents, Mr. Ron Clark, Mr. David Schall, Mr. Mark
Dalquist, and their planner Mr. Mike Gair were present. Interested
neighbors were present.
Mr. Clark addressed the commission informing them the plan
before them this evening is different from the plans previously
submitted. Mr. Clark pointed out at past meetings CDS Partners
requested variances from the conservation easement. The plat
presented this evening requests no variances, and is in full
compliance with all city subdivision requirements.
Mr. Gair with graphics pointed out the changes in the plat.
Lot 3 now meets the 100 foot conservation easement stipulated by
the subdivision ordinance, and the sanitary sewer line has been
shifted south to provide more spacing between houses.
Commissioner Hale interjected that he still has a concern that-
adequate spacing must be provided between the proposed houses. He
asked Mr. Clark if he thought it was possible to provide more
spacing between these houses, possibly 30 feet. He said the
minimum setback of 10 feet is too small for the size of houses that
will be constructed on this site.
Mr. Clark said houses proposed for this site will be custom,
and every effort to provide maximum spacing will be implemented.
Mr. Clark pointed out on Lots 4 and 5 the spacing between the
existing houses (on Schaefer) and the proposed houses will be 100
and 45 + feet. Mr. Clark said his aim is to maintain maximum
spacing between all houses. He added as he understands the
ordinance, 10 feet is the required sideyard setback, and he
reiterated he will make every effort to provide sideyard setbacks
in excess of 10 feet. Mr. Clark concluded that without individual
house plans it is hard to pinpoint exactly what the setback will be
on each house.
Commissioner Runyan said he would be concerned if the proposed
houses were depicted to be constructed 10 feet from the existing
houses on Schaefer Road but these houses are between 45 and 100
feet away, which is adequate. Commissioner Runyan pointed out on
Ridge Road the houses are 10 feet apart, and are quite substantial
is size. He concluded in this instance he is not concerned with
0
setbacks because the spacing between houses will be more than 10
feet.
Commissioner Palmer said his concern is whether it is fair to
request that this developer must maintain larger setbacks than
stipulated by city ordinance. Commissioner Palmer added if the
commission feels there is something wrong with our ordinance
setbacks that is where the change should occur,, not imposing it on
one certain developer. Massing has been a concern, but we have not
been directed to ensure that larger spacing must be required on a
no variance plat.
Chairman Johnson said that while legally we cannot require
larger setbacks, we can recommend that the developer make every
effort to place each house in the most appropriate space, and
provide adequate spacing for houses of the size that will be
constructed on these lots.
Commissioner L. Johnson pointed out it has been this board's
insistence to develop this site with no variances that has caused
the concern and much discussion on "over building the site" and
"massing ". He pointed out if the developer would have been allowed
to develop this site with creativity, and place houses in the most
advantageous places, this site would have had more design
flexibility, more spacing, instead of imposing artificial
standards. Commissioner Johnson' said in his opinion variances
should have been thoughtfully discussed and should have been given
more consideration. Variances can create more desirable lots.
Commissioner McClelland questioned the size of the building
pads on Lots 4, and 5. Mr. Gair said on Lot 5 the east /west
building pad dimension is 90 feet, north /south dimension is 50
feet. On Lot 4 the east /west building pad dimension is 90 feet,
the north /south dimension is 45 feet.
Chairman Johnson clarified for the commission and audience
that what is depicted on the preliminary plat is the maximum
building pad. The proposed houses will not necessarily be
constructed as depicted.
Commissioner McClelland said she has a concern that a two
story house could be constructed within this natural area, adding
she would prefer to see low profiles homes constructed on this
site. Continuing, she pointed out the proposed road /cul -de -sac
will cut a scar into the area, and there will be much blacktop.
Commissioner McClelland explained that she is disappointed in the
amount of disturbance that will occur within this natural setting.
Commissioner McClelland noted that while she agrees that there has
been a lot of concentration and discussion on maintaining the 100
foot conservation easement there has not been enough discussion on
the density of four houses within this area. She stated she
3
believes three houses better suit this site from environmental
standpoints.
Commissioner Ingwalson said the flip side of four lots versus
three lots is it appears when you have less lots you get larger
homes. Commissioner Ingwalson pointed out in a way four lots limit
the size of the new houses, and these houses may be less
conspicuous than three massive homes.
Mr. Schall asked to address the commission and informed them
in response to the attorney for the Golub property he will be
planting along his driveway (abutting Golub house) a minimum of 25
trees. These trees will provide a buffer as requested for the
Golub house. Mr. Schall said he has contacted a representative for
the Golub.house requesting that they plant some of these trees on
the Golub property which would provide denser screening.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen how the shift of the
sewer line will be implemented and inspected. Mr. Larsen said it
will be implemented through the.developers agreement. It will be
covered by the same documentation that covers all public
improvements for subdivision.
Ms. Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road told the commission she
wants this meeting postponed because she was not officially
notified of this meeting in advance. Ms. Robinson pointed out she
has been fighting this proposal for the past six months, and has
attended all past meetings. Ms. Robinson said, in her opinion, the
plan is initially the same, and has only been changed by moving the
sewer line south, and maintaining the city's 100 foot conservation
easement requirement from waterbodies, thus the proponent now has
a plat that requires no variances. Ms. Robinson expressed, in her
opinion, five houses (including the Schall house) within this area
does not maintain the character, and integrity of this
neighborhood.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if there is a requirement to
notify neighbors of this meeting. Mr. Larsen explained that state
law requires official public notice of meetings only before the
City Council, not the Planning Commission. Our subdivision
ordinance took this requirement a step further and now requires
that the proponent(s) inform residents within the 11500 foot
neighborhood" when an issue first comes before the Planning
Commission. Our ordinance also requires that a sign is to be posted
within view of all street fronts informing residents that an
application has been received by the planning department to
subdivide, and to contact city hall, planning department if there
are any questions. Items that are continued from the council
meeting back to the planning commission for review typically are
followed up through phone calls to the city from interested
neighbors, and on occasion the planning office has contacted
residents by phone. The neighbors within this neighborhood have
4
always kept abreast of the situation and the hearings.
Ms. Robinson said she believes it is unfair this evening to
hear a one sided opinion, and tonight the developer is the only
voice that is prepared. Chairman Johnson said the neighbors within
this neighborhood have been very involved, and continue to be
involved at every meeting that has occurred regarding this
proposal. The Planning Commission has made every effort to ensure
that all voices are heard.
Continuing, Ms. Robinson pointed out at past meetings it
appears that all the commission and council have discussed are the
variances concerning this proposal, with nothing mentioned about
the EAW the neighbors have filed, or the importance of protecting
the character and symmetry of this neighborhood. Ms. Robinson
declared at present the Schall house is becoming densely developed
with a swimming pool, and a pool house /gazebo, which adds more hard
surfaces, more disruption of a sensitive area. Ms. Robinson
inquired where the water run off is supposed to go when all this is
developed. She stressed she does not want her rear yard flooded as
a result of this development. Chairman Johnson interjected that
the issue of water run off will be carefully studied by our City
Engineer to ensure.that adjoining properties are not altered as a
result of this subdivision
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen to clarify the EAW. Mr.
Larsen said the Council carefully studied the EAW and recommended
that the EAW be dismissed. Chairman Johnson advised Ms. Robinson
that the Council has acted on the EAW, and it is now not an issue
for this body to discuss or pursue. Ms. Robinson concluded by
stressing the neighbors have worked very hard to cultivate the
wildlife in this area, and any development will have a negative
impact on existing wildlife habitats. She pointed out she will not
have the same view she purchased, and her property values will be
impacted.
Ed Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, objected to no official
notice of this meeting, and indicated he has not had enough time to
respond to the proposal as submitted. He asserted the proponents
keep switched their tactics, and now have come up with a plat that
does not seek variances. Mr. Glickman said, in his opinion, just
because this plat no longer contains a variance it should not mean
it is automatically approved.
Chairman Johnson reiterated that questions regarding notice or
lack of notice are beyond the scope of this body, notice is
required from the proponents for the first Planning Commission
meeting, and from city staff for the first public hearing before
the City Council. Residents within the 500 foot neighborhood will
be formally notified of the upcoming council meeting. Chairman
Johnson suggested if you have any questions regarding the way the
City has handled public hearing notices raise that issue with the
5
City Council or City Attorney.
Mr. Glickman continued his presentation, and stated he does
not believe the present proposal meets the character and symmetry
of the immediate Schaefer Road neighborhood. He pointed out his
figures have been assembled to reflect only the Schaefer Road lots,
and this subdivision falls flat when you compare it to the lots on
Schaefer Road, and is not in character with the Schaefer Road
neighborhood. Mr. Glickman pointed out the 500 foot neighborhood
and took issue with our ordinance including the 500 foot
neighborhood. Mr. Glickman contended he is very frustrated and
without the benefit of more research on the definition.of what a
"neighborhood" is, he cannot adequately proceed. He pointed out
the proponents indicated the proposed houses may be two story which
is out of character with the more low profile homes within this
neighborhood. Mr. Glickman referred to the subdivision ordinance
810.13 Subd. 2, and the dedication of land for public use, or as an
easement for the city to 'maintain the conservation easement, and
also referred to Subd. 3, noting the ordinances require a
dedication of property for public use on any parcel over 6 acres,
or money is to be donated. Mr. Glickman observed it would be
agreeable if this proposed would provide a land allowance creating
trailways around the waterbodies that could be used by the public.
Mr. Glickman also questioned how the underground utilities would be
handled. Mr. Glickman concluded by reminding the Commission at
their October 28, meeting this body indicated three lots would be
favorable, and larger sideyard setbacks were also recommended. Mr.
Glickman reiterated that just because there are four lots without
variances it should not be "slam dunk" approved.
Mr. Larsen responded to Mr. Glickmans comments on using
private property for public use. Mr. Larsen explained the City
Council in considering subdivision dedication for this proposal,
and in almost all instances, recommends a cash dedication. Mr.
Larsen said cash is recommended in lieu of land if the property
does not abut a city park, which in this instance the subject site
does not abut a park, so therefore a cash settlement is warranted.
Mr. Larsen clarified if this site abutted a public park land would
be a reasonable trade.
Patrick Manthy, 6013 Interlachen Boulevard, told the
Commission Mr. Larsen spoke with him a number of years ago and
indicated that only three lots would work well on this site. Mr.
Manthy pointed out the developer has now requested four lots, plus
the Schall lot in this area, which will destroy the character and
symmetry of the neighborhood. Mr. Manthy stressed the character
and symmetry of the neighborhood must be maintained. Two story
massive houses will make this site look like a subdivision within
the middle of a neighborhood.
Mr. Ted Pier, 5021 Ridge Road, told the Commission he wants
this site to contain less than the proposed five houses. Mr. Pier
referred to the Sun - Current which indicated that members of the
City Council indicated they desire fewer lots, which is what the
neighbors desire. Mr. Pier concluded that all of us also desire a
plat that contains no variances.
Mr. Dalquist 5012 Schaefer addressed the Commission and
responded to Ms. Robinson's concern that her rear yard could flood
as a result of this development. Mr. Dalquist said Ms. Robinson
referred to Mr. Schall's house which will drain into the south
pond, and he pointed out there is no connection between the north
and south ponds. Continuing, Mr. Dalquist explained that the
proposed two houses on the north of the cul -de -sac will drain into
the north pond, which should not make any difference to Ms.
Robinson's property. Mr. Dalquist reported that all water run -off
for this area has always been directed this way. Mr. Dalquist
questioned why it has been acceptable in the recent past to
construct new houses along Ridge Road, and have them drain into the
ponds, but when we propose to locate houses on this property
abutting theses ponds, these houses should not be able to drain
into these ponds, and the neighbors believe the new houses will
create problems. Mr. Dalquist pointed out that while wildlife is
worthwhile to maintain we should not have to provide sanctuary for
wildlife when all of .Edina, including the new houses on Ridge Road
have been developed, with some impact on wildlife areas. Mr.
Dalquist said it is fair to assume human beings are going to reside
in houses, and all houses will take away land from wildlife. Mr.
Dalquist declared that we have, and we will in the future do the
best we can to cause as little disruption to the wildlife habitats.
Mr. Dalquist pointed out some people actually believe the deer
within this area cause problems for them and their gardens. Mr.
Dalquist stressed what we are planning to do is to construct four
houses on a 6 + acre site. When the Schall site is included, it is
five houses on 10.4 acres, which is roughly 2 acres for each site.
The north portion provides one and 1/2 acre -lots. Mr. Dalquist
pointed out his lot is only a 3/4 acre lot, and many other sites
within the immediate area are less then one acre. Mr. Dalquist
reiterated what we are proposing to do is in keeping with the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood. He said his house is
two stories, and many houses along Ridge Road are also two story,
so there should be no objection to two story homes, or any
reference that two story homes are out of character for this
neighborhood. This development should not be disruptive to the
neighborhood, and should blend into what has been previously
developed. Mr. Dalquist referred to an aerial and pointed out that
visually the lots are in keeping with the size, and character of
the neighborhood, and are actually larger -than most.
Commissioner McClelland said
of the neighbors regarding this
advance notice, and indicated she
this item for one month to allow
adequately for this hearing.
7
she can understand the confusion
hearing because of the lack of
has no objection if we continue
the neighbors time to prepare
Commissioner Runyan said with all due respect that he
recommends approval of the subdivision, subject to staff conditions
noting with all respect to all persons who have spoke to this issue
this evening, that we have met a number of, times, and have heard
arguments and discussion concerning all aspects of this proposal,
and in his opinion all troublesome and bothersome facts have been
heard and addressed. Commissioner Runyan said the concern over the
possibility of two story houses being constructed on this site
should not be an issue, because we do not know what will be
constructed, and that is not in our authority to dictate. Four
houses on over six acres of land is not a dense situation, which
has been indicated by neighbors a number of times. Commissioner
Runyan said he also does not understand the comments that property
values will be reduced, because the proposed houses will be very
expensive and in all likelihood will increase the property values
in the neighborhood, not decrease them. Commissioner Runyan
pointed out this site is also visually separated from Ridge Road
with dense vegetation, and the proposed houses will be constructed
over 100 feet off Schaefer Road, which makes any impact minimal.
Commissioner Runyan pointed out the developer has now met the 100
foot conservation easement setback, has developed the lot with no
variances, the lot size is adequate, and the proposal meets the
standards of the neighborhood and requirements of our ordinance.
Commissioner Runyan concluded that the developer will be able to
construct four very nice homes. Commissioner Palmer seconded the
motion and responded with respect to character and symmetry of the
neighborhood, that he agrees with recent comments from Mr.
Dalquist. Commissioner Palmer said regarding the notice issue, he
is satisfied that staff have acted properly, and has been reassured
that residents will be formally notified of the City Council
meeting, and will have the benefit of a full public hearing.
Commissioner Byron pointed out that Mr. Larsen indicated in
his previous staff report if this site is developed with variances
it would be preferable to a site developed without variances, due
to proper spacing. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if he has
changed his opinion from those comments. Mr. Larsen said the
proposed shifting of the sewer line better affords farther
separation of the proposed homes, which is acceptable. Ayes; Hale,
L. Johnson, Runyan, Palmer, Shaw, Ingwalson, Workinger, G.
Johnson. Nays, Byron, Faust, McClelland. Motion for approval
carried 8 -3
8 -92 -3 Preliminary Plat Approval
Garnaas Addition
Nancy Garnaas and Kevin McTigue,
Lot 15, Skyline
8
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Telephone Engineers
612/476 -6010 Planners
612/476 -8532 FAX Surveyors
December 17, 1992
Mr. Craig Larsen, City Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55435
SUBJECT: CDS Partners
Mark Dalquist Addition
MFRA #9893
Dear Mr. Larsen:
With this letter, we are forwarding an aerial photograph and a lot
tabulation which we believe will be of value to the Mayor and City Council
members. More specifically, this information may assist in addressing the
issue of neighborhood character and symmetry.
Please forward copies of this to the Mayor and each Council member. We
look forward to the review of this project on December 21, 1992•
Kindest regards,
McCO S FRANK ROOS V OCIATES, INC.
1:
Michael J. it
MG:jmk
Enclosures
cc: Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction Co.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
1
SUMMARY of A0JA«WT L_oTs
�(P 50)
Lot wll)th
Ltrr
'
ja+_ Vz41:1eUIs -"gyp:
A� ��
s WlbiFl t.r'
b�
1-dr1
192-13`1Z•
1-1 j<,'57 ,f, 320'
plot
L-Or z
Co 11 750
531 oo0.1E ISO,
7l80'
Lora
. 6:1611 Z5o
391450;, Z55'
7, 7CP'
Lo1"4
511942
331 50l 'r, 195'
27 (1+
[.,0r5
&51170
351 2,15'
Flo '
SUMMARY of A0JA«WT L_oTs
Lot wll)th
'
1,01. Allen
50' SetbneIt
Lot Depth 1 -a a
J. q,vo
Address No. Ml-.)
�I.. P.)
L. F. O,pu• r
V pit. Ulf
Schwonte's Addition
1Z�`a•e� A jl,w.l -j
t11,(IOo
!!lock 1, Lot If
119281&-17- (2•P 17, 100
120
1110
(�ewr^ad a Il)�.1y0
�jq'tlo•
Lot 5
119292 _j1.114 16,000
115
150
E1 Ilancho Addition
Illock 1, Lot 1
611211M4A/n, /.••15,000
125
120 V +L Qn.dnt��
tlq,q o0
11$jloo
1.0t 9
119091rrel••+4c`12800
165
78 F. wnv✓e P0.l,neo
Lot 9
611161N+••10"I'Al2 :800
70
165 'TA-al %o'O. -We
441g0o
Wny)te 'Terrace
!)lock 1, Lot 2
611o8tvTt;teln,aOJb0,1100
165
1�o2CRr j.lAstte,J
66
t 40 0
I
Lot 1
6lloosNletkn•• '72,1150
190
366 m>aRe,AtdT )aRcA,er� b'Itue
lnterinchell Heights
--
Block 1, Lot 11
- - -- 25,300
150
173
916'00
Lot 5
50(10 R, o. ¢ "' 23.700
130
100 c rj c R o u ,r
I'nrhwnod Knolls 21st AddiLlo,l
KFeIQCe"t!
(geaeo
Illock 1, Lot 1
5200R,1sa 1'7,000
130
175 VnRae<,•eo
89 500
Lot 2
52011RIJ -cd 16,200
120
150 3 V -t 53 �
'"
gy qpv
,
I)}ock 3, Lot 1
5201 R.dc+ 20,500
160
110 rift + r, 11)�1ru,r•Nnt1
k
Lot 2
5207, Red a •e 19.050
150
125 P A R w 000
111 Cte,r
90,000
Lot 3
r) ;!W)P,Ia6 a 211,800
130
1'10 PAR I( to
t.. 1. ,A a, •N
89
I.ot 111
521(d.Arnee Ld 19.800
)110
139 R,t , r..
Rat s
goo
Q1t
1.Ot 15
A'
�i211tRanant"' 17,150
110
125 AG , inG
P,,+.,.Ar.
90 900
Lot 16
tetttAO't t r
5200 1),2950
r
135
135 MO • n t-
6 I llI Ce.i+►
CID, 960
Lot 17
A46 LAW, 250
52011tWill U
120
160 P(I we•• -,Je
IC.0111-i C-Arl
9y 9oo
Illock 11, Lot t
521I'Lnnw0n 10,600
100
105 o19RK Wet b
Lot 2
5215c.AtlAOa 17,050
131-
130 uc . on ensr3evauc
IRS ,9so
Ilendrlckson•s First Addition
t ,"i0 s eR `
F l,1ee
Black 1, Lot 1
5101 R -Aa a 63.350
1911
326 1- -1 r^
I've.) Ti.r
'1 3 �'L.'
Lot 2
5109 11.J&-,, 112,1100 '
129
m k n.
326 T 1
Flognret Cosgrove's AtldIboil
6
r "- t � �
6 9oo
Illock 1 , Lot 1
5f109 aca ..( 32,550
1011
313 1.1.
LOS .ti
!09900
Lot 2
5013 12-0- 32,550
loll
313 rn. CAR
G. (700S." ;b.
,9aou
Lot 3
5021 P :J e. 38, 150
130
312 T a Pty r .
C.11. Strotz Flust Atldll.itrn
Jae°.,
Illock 1, Lot 1
(15191.,et.i...1- 11,U�iU
175
lyU �neca 1t�n�,n+-
I, u,jso
Lot 2
61iol i-Pr M -- ,26,600
1110
190 T. 6. 1.1• 1 swAUC.�•
Ilnrold Woods
7a Fo u
Iliot:k 1, Lo (
6111; ;1 ✓1r't�e•►•7,1,200
16O .
307 P, t r,�t1U'tYN
1a 900
Lot 2
61109.1 Ail I; it 1118,000 •It
160
307 r ,t e o r n1.K
(.ot 3
61105 r,11 ex "I''�i9,200*
160
307 si e,,, t3N FRUC),4 n.wJ
j7, f0a
I.OL 11
61101 7.,1.t+Ce••31,600
160
200 Vtrr.,•.j n,1NtA,
-jS'l00
I.0L 5
5ooll$r1.0•r•r 31 , 100
187
167 PO GGt X701, ., +o.J
191100
Ilnrold Wootln 2nd AtltlllAms
10,100
Illock 1, I -vL I
filloASC- 1.010(,:,-' ;),11(1()
1!il)
229 13,3. Rlelt+.,
Lot 2
',7,(1123.LNCP,- lit).�oo K
150
250 01,9. _inlgO,sl
/na4oa
11111.0 l (I WOnlls 31'(1 A(Itl.l t I oil
10 5100
Mack 1, Let 1
5016' 9(l-i" 118,300
275
225 Evel•i�l '1000.'6'
Oak I'tntlls of lnterlachen 2nd Atldltltnt
I11ock 1, Lot 1 5209SAA -l'"L It 6.650
1613
209 DO, lc Post?
IOU 300
Lot 2
62311-01mer6It.,23,050
80
210 Ed - mP F-00
Iltl ab✓
Lo 5
5217S�I,A.re,•- 6'00700
163
1121 Eowott0 CL.ckn•AJ
Ioftoo
Auditor's Sub(1(vlslon No. 325
Lot 2
5012 9--dal 35,050
112
313 , -.Toep It d rR.v +011"•0
a 1300
Lot 3
5016 A0%s 31,300
100
313 Lt) nyA)13 UO lit) GOO A)
GP,9ou
Lot 3. 11
5100 9 'J 0 31.200
loo
312. A) 0 � • ° °'t °
Lot h
510orr.6t- 53,OUo
1 13.
311 171.E 13EKG11ttd.1
68,900
I.ot 11
51"09',66 -. 37,200
120
310 flair- (at:,t G J �
0eea. D' krL
-11, 500
Lot 5
5112R,A0A 1111,650
11111
310 j
7 e, 000
Lot 5
5116 R; 6 a• 5t 1, 000
165
309 f) ✓ a J ., 1 l e" a c
Lot 5
512oR',dt4 115.750
1110
309 .7'Op�J 5c • 1+
1'''p0
baD
Lot 7
5117 R.da • 120,1150
365
325 c.1.1. Crid 0001(
1(13,
Lot' 9
5025R;da-c 119,050
125
327 ],t1 m,R, 6tteo�r
79,�eo
Lot 12
520OW,Ae••^ 131,600-
200
630 110001 -Y ° "i6
Lot t;
Lot: 22
- - -- 11G.�i5o
5201 .4cl.Aefe- 101.950
305
163
636 _
I( •l�
630 1 c l 0
Lot Lot 23
512541.e0relc loll - 15(1
163
639 PA" it"'^ S n�ov.e 1,
tee
Ia,, le+
I.M. 211
5117 S1 I.ottct:102,700
200
513 lit 6 + Cs Il ✓.JA
Ii 4, 400
Lot 25
5113SO -1-ct 51,75()
199
260 i • e K.rs - T,.' Jltei
Pit, Ito
Lot 26
5113se"c rte 102,150
190
516 • ..
Lot 27
502197,1'0'•"" 2'%.3()0
105
260 rif 110 J n,a 1 e s[tt
Bs-,ee,
Lot 28
)0000tove 20(.),1100
265
798 911 Boo s
11 It 100
Inl.crinchen 111dg1I
Illock 1. Lot I
it, ;211., .w.1w112 ()()()
2611
It
2911 VA•IZ C,lt('
1.11;7,))
Lo.V 2
5ollSt.l.atcert 21,650
100
260 Pi vi + Jr 5,1,n.iIL
iis,900
LoL 3
!701'! S.x., ter rt•- 26. 100
100
261 ti-T r 1 0• 1
" TOTAL
- -- 018 , 500 +
GO f.ots 2 ,
60 9 378 r 60
17.2116 + 60, ti y, C, U. o
;- 51 a
HCAN AVERAGE
116,975
156
287
HEu k7,
33.325
150
276 96,o�s
e 1 Aren ingn Pt.n,l Area
g Id 6
113, 100
1551600
I -1'I, 7 00
111130° .
440 b al a - -... .
183,700
sJ)J► 00
'9111Pp0
31t1 too 0
37,9, 600
3a�1 Feu
17,600
jae�l0e
3pc1� je0.
»p, too
367, 90•
0,7, yee
3 ,13; 0 0
aia,joo
199,reu
36 s, bp°
330, Vou
1.11 You
�•ff, Tuu
,7 e3,1. .
79'1,'100
I6l,let
aob,aIto
711,6 i1
960,100
I
ljd0, 6ou
all. 0 0
337, 5-00'
IYl,�loa
167,,0
1
11►, �0u
46'9, 80✓
739.•••
17lseo
31-1,000
331,400
A'3 7,�•e Cs Is +i%
J`
.$e0, Poo
P71, toe
., 1-?, roe
tfaF,ls✓
375,6 °O
rP76,791- ...-
W
0
jrj-.A
Mr. Frederick S. Richards
Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards,
December 21, 1992
Since I will be unable to attend this evenings City
Council Meeting, I am writing to voice my concerns regarding
the subdivision of the Dalquist property on Schaefer Road. I
have attended five of the numerous meetings regarding this
situation over the past six months, and feel that one last
effort must be made to convince you of the sensitivity of
this area with regard to the flood plain and watershed
issues before the final vote is made.
First, let me thank you for your stand on the 100 foot
setback from both ponds in this area. As we said during the
November hearings, those of us who already live on the pond
are strickly adhereing to this setback, both for aesthetic
considerations, and for the fact that the shoreline is
extremely volatile and will react to extremes of both drought
and heavy rains. Our biggest fear is that if the natural
flood plain of the area between Ridge Road and Schaefer is
filled with hard surfaces (roofs, asphalt, pools or other
non - draining areas), the reaction of the shorelines will be
intensified and will adversely impact the entire area.
For this reason, I ask you to please consider again
allowing only three homesites in addition to the Schall
residence for that area, not four as requested by the
developers.
Thank you kindly for your consideration of this letter.
Sincerely,
Peggy Carlisle
5013 Ridge Road
CC: City Council Members
5013 Ridge Road, Edina, Minnesota 55436 612- 935 -1668
4 12/21/92 09:03 a 612 925 7693 GOPCO P.02
1
iLGEN t7A- M a
Edward W. Glickman
5217 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN 55436
December 12, 1992
Fredrick S. Richards
7225 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, MN 55439
Re;: Proposed Dahl qui st Plat
u -
Dear Council Per- son Richards:
As you know, I oppose the proposed Dahl qui st subdivision
along with virtually every other neighbor who abuts the
subject property. We continue our opposition to the
proposed five lot subdivision in spite of the recent
December 2, 1992, Planning Commission recommendation
for approval.
We are at a critical crossroads in the plat approval
process. Prior hearings, at both the Commission and
Council levels, have focused on the request by the
developers for a variance on the conservation easement. On
December 2, 1992, without notice to the opponents by the
Planning Commission, in a stunning about face the
developers asked for and received by a split vote a
recommendation for preliminary plat approval of a five
lot plat with all building pads outside the 100 foot
conservation easement.
While I renew all the issues previously raised by other
opponents and myself, i wi 1 1 stand on the record and not
reiterate them in detail in this letter. There Is one more
remaining issue that has riot been raised previously which
requires your attention.
Apparently, it has been the prior practice and procedure of
Planning Staff to interpret the lot size requirements of
12/21/92 09:03 a 612 925 7693 GOPCO P.03
Subdivision Ordinance No. 804 by the definitions of the
Zoning Ordinance No. 825 on Lot Depth to exclude water.
This exclusionary definition was followed since these
Ordinances passed in all plats Involving water up to and
Including the Wooddal a Lakes and Dahl qui st Subdivisions.
As you know, the Planning 5taf f excluded water and the
developer included water In their respective initial
calculations on the lot size requirements of Plat
Ordinance No. 804. Apparently, Staff held firm to the past
practice and pol 1 cy ,of the Planning Commission to exclude
water from Lot depth in its discussions 'with the developer
in preparation for the first Planning Comm i ssi on meeting
on May 27, 199:`. At that meeting, Staff continued to hold
Its position and alerted the Commission to the conflict
between Staff and developer. In response to a question by a
Commissioner to Staff as to the rationale behind the water
per ground issue, the minutes reflect "Mr. Larsen
explained what the our [ sic) ordinance wants to preserve
is the ratio of ground to the ratt o of the house (emphasis
added). " This Is one of the reasons that It Is also Staff's
position that Lot Coverage Is defined, by them and even the
developer in its present application, to exclude water, 'I he
requests by the developer for variances on Lot Depth and
conservation easement were denied.
Between that meeting and the July 7, 1992, City Council
meeting that was continued, until July 20, 1992 the City
Attorney at the request of the developer and the cost of the
City issued his opinion on Lot Depth on July 15, 1992. He
opined that water, should be Included 1 n Lot Depth. He based
this opinion on the fact that because water was
specifically excluded from the companion definition of Lot
Area and riot from Lot Depth the drafters must have
intended to include water. On July 20, 1992, Staff advised
the Council of the opinion and the minute's state he said
that "if it is accepted by the Council that lot depth
includes ponding areas, no lot depth variances would be
required." After much discussion none of which - included
adopting or rejecting the opinion letter, the Council
decided to refer the matter to the Commission for its
recommendation because they had not had the benefit of
this "new" circumstance.
12/21/92 09:04 a 612 925 7693 GOPCO P.04
On July 29, 1992, Staff similarly adv I 'sed the
Commission of the City Attorney's opinion and said that
" 1 f adopted" by the Commission the requested Lot Depth
variance would f al 1. Fortunately, this time the Lot Depth
issue was not totally ignored. The minutes of that meeting
reflect, "Commissioner McClelland noted the letter from
_the city attorney, and his conclusion that water should be
included when calculating lot depth. She stated that she
does not agree .with that interpretation. Commissioner
McClelland added that she agrees with the staff
interpretation of the ordinance that water is not included
in calculations for lot depth (emphasis added)." Also at
the same time arfd meeting, "( Commissioner Byron) stated
the inclusion of the letter from Mr. Gilligan does not
alter his feelings. He said he was not confused nor did lie
feel the Commi ssi on was confused regarding the lot depth
question (emphasis added)." Unfortunately, in retrospect,
the Commission then became focused on the conservation
easement and there was no formal motion or vote on the lot
depth issue.
The September 8, 1992, and October 5, 1992, meetings
quickly became side tracked on the CAW Petition Issues. By
the time of the October, 28, 1992, and November 16,
1992, Commission and Council meetings, the only
remaining item on the Dahl qui st agenda was consideration
of the requested variance from the 100 foot conservation
easement.
The problem with the forgoing procedural history is that
neither the Planning Commission, nor. the City Council has
formally ratified the City Attorney's opinion on Lot
Depth.
The opponents of the Dahl qui st Sub di vi si on bel 1 eve there Is
amps a author 1 ty to al l ow an i ndependent party to come up
with a conclusion opposite to that of the City Attorney.
Without going Into technical citations, the authorities
who write on statutory construction generally take a
common sense approach and rely arnorigst other things on
prior administrative practice and drafter's intent In
order to determine what is meant by an ordinance
12/21/92 09:04 S 612 925 7695 GOPCO P.05
Clearly and unquestionably, prior administrative
interpretation of Lot Depth has been to exclude water. This
was the approach taken in Lhe Wooddale Lakes Subdivision
arid, at least 1 n1 ti al 1 y, in the Dahl 'qui st Subdivision. This
makes perfect sense. No one Is better qualified to say what
an Ordinance means than Individuals within the agency
charged to deal with the day to day problems of
administering an Act. No one has more experience in
resolving the many practical issues such as watered plats,
unforeseen even by those who drafted the Act. This also
provides the practical result of consistency. Applicants
for subdivisions have a right to operate "on a level fiela."
F or exampl e, the` app i cants of Wooddal a Lakes are bet ng
put to a dif.ferent standard than CDS Partners and future
appl 1 cants merely because of the opinion of one person who
was neither directly Involved i n the drafting process; nor,
the actual day to day application of the Ordinance.
The issue of intent is more difficult to address
substantively. Most of the City Council was present at
most of the hearings and discussions on at least the new
Zoning and Subdi.v i si on Ordinances. All the Council holds
their own idea of what It intends for new development In
the City. This also makes sense. Interpretative authorities
put great weight on legislative intent. If it is the intent
of the City to avoid overcrowded subdivisions as Mr.
Larsen stated on May 27, 1992 ( "ground to house ratio")
then water must be excluded from the definition of Lot
Depth as it Is specifically in the more encompassing
concept of Lot Area and implicitly by prior practice In
Lot Coverage. I can not tel 1 you what was 1 n your minds
when those of you who where there drafted the Ordinance
any more than Mr. Gilligan can. You are the only ones who
know these facts.
In summary, authorities who write on this subject make it
clear that what controls in statutory construction Is prior
pr act i ce and 1 egi sl ative i ntent. These factors are gi ven
greater weight than outside opinions. The Council should be
very careful .about its next action because If it accepts
the opinion of the City Attorney It is radically changing
the prior practice and policy of the City. It is also, it"
12/21/92 09:05 a 612 925 7693 GOPCO P.06
my suspions are correct, frustrating the intent of the
drafters of the ordinance. Even if the Council disagrees
with my interpretation of the law on construction and the
Intent of the drafters It must specifically address the
opinion and accept or reject it by formal motion and vote.
1 write this letter before the December 21, 1992, meeting
both to allow each of you enough time to search your
memories on the Council's intent on future development and
to allow me enough time to talk personally with each one
of you to find out what happened when the Ordinance was
drafted.
4
Respe f ul 1 y Submitted,
Edward W. Glickman
Robinson Enfierprisec Inc
�C=i A I'E• i I I . A.
�- ;:Thank youi.r r' + o f4. t. "+ rr ...,,. 1..,`' ..d.�•' ,-taf N. ,+ of --
x
t L �f..
�n .�_ 'L�'`I��, LH'Hi� Y��'i�9 �•ji`-~I•`l•y Y' l' � efN.• �u 4' .r1 y'.',� yr. -�it•
etsy R'bh usOn'" , +Ya ..F'..Y .. 4 W'° `y� :£K� y' .k?� .r
' r,• [ d r
y' ''•*n1�°�Tk�i{. '�7 � }��,4 _ 7� T�iY{�, q�t, g�.i� '� , {+ �.,, �a w •z 'y -� a `r'i ^�• "_,_.:�� - .
F.
a �: -tr, i7t�c'e' rl�N� ,j• .." _ r
",P�lu��y,�L rah r � _ -;:.; ` '+- - �'F�'�•�' � .• i Yt v ..
. •� � __- .Sf�,„ tf Yr : �r ��� A4�`�i- w. t♦ � � r„S it --
r .y r l.�h.7r, y,'! \°f i. i..! �r• .h Slr �7f: i
�
- .. t 7''��$-�'�'�?i F-' -r arn�w 1�` �� J;i� � � � •' y Ff„ �`"sY� -. `K t ;i��,� -.i � � ..
WI
•,. .� _ ..i{r ��''11- T�_._,f„�_ � r � s i. , r,i[� {• r t I s �� r �i' if {"`K.i;�.�.M; c��, d:� _sue 1 :b
,�r,•1�:;,t-
r -. �) N��s. $-'�: KyN,. ; - r .'_•. '!r i,��r.:l� !r 1 I(:�_ -= _ _ 1 t 1' .r l � � L- 4"h„$'. '�1FV l��- 7 c
a- � � .nfk ,:�!' iA -ctr; `te �. Esc b':- Wa.. 'iR �.•vl ' p6 rf '•,;, , S,..e� :' - t r - .:.::i;'r� a .'>: .' -
':sy L�''� -_'�. .�F scii, i- #�..��•. r �l �`' � {:�,5i i • -..' a+ CAS tKT'�` F7'+ � -%i .�i"�J+B r � ,1,• .. t.
. '.r '.c7i- ."'ST -� ' :"Y i. "+1 � � F r L � i "'L' ,ia -� _ - °' .. y��- e� ('''lt •t•:_T`f�,` a �ti•;
, �.. 1 ti '� � i�•a.d� --• Fo_S• y�,,.i�n �,.,,tR•� �1 ;'i5 .,ria- C ' �eK4Y�r �. r� `wr��� �. �,. L �;.,..
. y:u L4;
y ;.U1�ii �x�'�e; �Y -
�r jJ ..a • -rk'�r � 1. ..r - q�a�.t .St - -r-i 'p�1 7��h'��,��tf�i I�"�.'t`' �`�, ,�7 }l
.:'W+ w.�ft_G,' >•� =, i•�pr;r'?.1 ay.'i y Sf Y�':i � , t` .!• �, w ���Mri�- Z• {�}1 r�•�`� ;�;:� �.I '•f..� -.�. �,c- }' �"
.=P^�?� 'f ���r ,Sy. {( '�£��y + fCiLa1` f� i .tiy -' ^�>`•-'ixl.. �,f %- tom.,,`'P7 -.
-
�Y7 6t �6i:e f K Z r t • �� �'iF { v �- i "�7 f; - +' � `� =�, .i:4°' • • '_
�ji'
a:4-I`. y .`11. 4 b r:. ' {• t' 6 ' 'R.. 'a�•• JarY ''Ly; ,� '-Y' `; y:� �" YR!y+
J. •
Betsy Robinson, Presiaent
f-
December M 1992
Dear Council.Member: ~,
Enclosed. isi. a . letter of_' concern- from an independent . engineering., fii'`.�
that the--neighborhood hired to . review, the. preliminary plan. submitted:..tai
,
the- City - Planning Dept . by. the Dahlquist- proposers. This was. done - 60204I.
assuage our--concerns over the water.-runoff problems that might occur with-:
the new subdivision going..into:an :,already -sensitive ecosystem.
AfteL-- axconversatiou -_with:.Bob- Obermeir.;.. jt%, of= the;, Nine. Mile- Wete =shed'
district:,, these- concerns-- of--'this firm are•- stated. in- the attached..lette I
tried to_ get thia.. into the: council. packet :. but: missed. it: by_ minutes:._. Mrimi..: -
Daehne- recommended. that_ I`de liver- it,ta- your- homes this -weekend.. Slie9wd11T"
have a copy.-for--the city records on: Monday.
�- ;:Thank youi.r r' + o f4. t. "+ rr ...,,. 1..,`' ..d.�•' ,-taf N. ,+ of --
x
t L �f..
�n .�_ 'L�'`I��, LH'Hi� Y��'i�9 �•ji`-~I•`l•y Y' l' � efN.• �u 4' .r1 y'.',� yr. -�it•
etsy R'bh usOn'" , +Ya ..F'..Y .. 4 W'° `y� :£K� y' .k?� .r
' r,• [ d r
y' ''•*n1�°�Tk�i{. '�7 � }��,4 _ 7� T�iY{�, q�t, g�.i� '� , {+ �.,, �a w •z 'y -� a `r'i ^�• "_,_.:�� - .
F.
a �: -tr, i7t�c'e' rl�N� ,j• .." _ r
",P�lu��y,�L rah r � _ -;:.; ` '+- - �'F�'�•�' � .• i Yt v ..
. •� � __- .Sf�,„ tf Yr : �r ��� A4�`�i- w. t♦ � � r„S it --
r .y r l.�h.7r, y,'! \°f i. i..! �r• .h Slr �7f: i
�
- .. t 7''��$-�'�'�?i F-' -r arn�w 1�` �� J;i� � � � •' y Ff„ �`"sY� -. `K t ;i��,� -.i � � ..
WI
•,. .� _ ..i{r ��''11- T�_._,f„�_ � r � s i. , r,i[� {• r t I s �� r �i' if {"`K.i;�.�.M; c��, d:� _sue 1 :b
,�r,•1�:;,t-
r -. �) N��s. $-'�: KyN,. ; - r .'_•. '!r i,��r.:l� !r 1 I(:�_ -= _ _ 1 t 1' .r l � � L- 4"h„$'. '�1FV l��- 7 c
a- � � .nfk ,:�!' iA -ctr; `te �. Esc b':- Wa.. 'iR �.•vl ' p6 rf '•,;, , S,..e� :' - t r - .:.::i;'r� a .'>: .' -
':sy L�''� -_'�. .�F scii, i- #�..��•. r �l �`' � {:�,5i i • -..' a+ CAS tKT'�` F7'+ � -%i .�i"�J+B r � ,1,• .. t.
. '.r '.c7i- ."'ST -� ' :"Y i. "+1 � � F r L � i "'L' ,ia -� _ - °' .. y��- e� ('''lt •t•:_T`f�,` a �ti•;
, �.. 1 ti '� � i�•a.d� --• Fo_S• y�,,.i�n �,.,,tR•� �1 ;'i5 .,ria- C ' �eK4Y�r �. r� `wr��� �. �,. L �;.,..
. y:u L4;
y ;.U1�ii �x�'�e; �Y -
�r jJ ..a • -rk'�r � 1. ..r - q�a�.t .St - -r-i 'p�1 7��h'��,��tf�i I�"�.'t`' �`�, ,�7 }l
.:'W+ w.�ft_G,' >•� =, i•�pr;r'?.1 ay.'i y Sf Y�':i � , t` .!• �, w ���Mri�- Z• {�}1 r�•�`� ;�;:� �.I '•f..� -.�. �,c- }' �"
.=P^�?� 'f ���r ,Sy. {( '�£��y + fCiLa1` f� i .tiy -' ^�>`•-'ixl.. �,f %- tom.,,`'P7 -.
-
�Y7 6t �6i:e f K Z r t • �� �'iF { v �- i "�7 f; - +' � `� =�, .i:4°' • • '_
�ji'
a:4-I`. y .`11. 4 b r:. ' {• t' 6 ' 'R.. 'a�•• JarY ''Ly; ,� '-Y' `; y:� �" YR!y+
SONDE ENGINEERING, INC.
GERALD M. SUNDE, Consulting Engineer
9001 East Bloomington Frwy. • Bloomington. MN 55420 • (612) 881 -3344
December 18, 1992
Ms. Betsy Robinson
5021 Ridae Road
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Re: Mark Dalquist Addition
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Ms. Robinson,
We have received the following information related to the above referenced project:
A. Grading and Drainage Plan for the proposed Mark Dalquist Addition dated 11/20/92.
The Grading and Drainage Plan was prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates,
Inc. I-
B. Response to Petition for EAW involving the Mark Dalquist Addition prepared by
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated October 1, 1992.
C. Hydrologic Calculations involving the Mark Dalquist Addition prepared by McCombs }
Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated September 9, 1992.
D. Excerpt from National Wetland Inventory Map and US Army Corps of Engineers
estimated wetland location on east side of the Mark Dalquist Addition dated September
10, 1992.
As you requested, we have reviewed the information that you provided. Our
recommendations regarding the proposed Mark Dalquist Addition are as follows:
The National Wetland Inventory Maps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicate
that there are wetlands on the Mark Dalquist Addition property. Currently there exists
a moratorium on alteration of wetlands in the State of Minnesota. Alteration of
wetlands requires a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers, a waiver from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and a permit from the local government unit
responsible for approving wetland alteration - -Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will require the developer to mitigate altered
wetland areas. One acre of wetland must be created by the developer for everyone
acre of wetland tilled.
Apparently Barr Engineering has field located and staked the perimeters of the existing
wetland areas on the Mark Dalquist Addition site. Barr Engineering is the consultant
for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. However, the existing wetland limits are
not indicated on the Grading and Drainage Plan. The developer should
• r`
,is. Betsy Robinson
December 18, 1992
Page 2
have the staked wetland limits field located by a registered land surveyor and the
developer should show the wetland limits on the Grading and Drainage Plan. Barr
Engineering should review and approve the wetland locations shown on the developer's
plan. Approvals should be granted only after the developer shows that the proposed
buildings and site grading work will not encroach on the existing wetlands.
If wetland fill is necessary for the proposed construction (which may be the case in
Lots 2 and 5), then the developer should be required to prepare a Wetland Replacement
Plan identifying the areas of wetland impact and how the replacement wetiand shall be
constructed.
The Grading and Drainage Plan does not indicate a surface overflow route and
elevation from the existing ponds. In order to protect the proposed buildings from
flooding, the lowest floor elevation of the proposed buildings should not be constructed
lower than 2 feet above the surface overflow elevation. The developer should have the
surface overflow location and elevation from the ponds field verified by a registered
land surveyor and the location and elevation should be shown on the Grading and
Drainage Plan.
3. The developer should prepare an Erosion Control and Restoration Plan for the proposed
construction for review and approval by the City and Watershed District.
4. Equalizer pipes in order to combine the north and south ponds are mentioned in the
Hydrologic Calculations for the proposed development project. However, equalizer
pipes are not shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan. If equalizer pipes are to be
constructed, they should be indicated on the Grading and Drainage Plan. .also, the size
and type of the proposed storm sewer should be indicated. Riprap and a Filter blanket
should be installed at the storm sewer outlets in accordance with MNDOT Standard
Specification 3601 and MNDOT Standard Plate 3133B.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shows an OHW elevation, but does not indicate
existing water surface elevations for the ponds. The developer should have the existing
pond elevations held verified by a registered land surveyor and the elevations should be
shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan. A determination of the actual levels of the
existing ponds is important since a water surface elevation of 937.5 is assumed in the
developer's hydrologic calculations for the project. Water surface elevations other than
the assumed 937.5 will invalidate the developer's conclusions regarding pond high
water levels.
6. A stormwater management plan should be prepared which details the means by which
the developer and /or the City will maintain the water surface elevations in the ponds at
or below their current elevations over the long term. The Watershed District has
indicated that this may require some form of pumped outlet from the ponds.
7. The source of the existing topographic information shown on the Grading and Drainage
Plan is not indicated. The developer should verify that the existing topographic
information is up -to -date.
Ms. Betsy Robinson
December 18, 1992
Page 3
8. The Grading and Drainage Plan has not been signed and certified by a registered
professional engineer. The plan should be signed by a registered engineer prior to
granting any formal approvals.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC.
Gerald M. Sunde, P.E.
GMS /bhm
December 19, 1992
City of Edina Planning Department
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424
To the Planning Department and City Council Members,
As a neighbor of the property being proposed for subdivision by CDS. Partnership, I am
very concerned about the impact of this development on the wildlife in the area, the water
level in the ponds, and the general environmental impact of the project.
My home is adjoining and immediately to the east of the proposed lot subdivision. On the
western boundary of my lot there is a low area ( a ravine of sorts) that throughout the past
summer has been full of water. I believe that with this development that area would be
filled because of the construction of the home that is proposed to be 10 feet from that
boundary line. The area is now the habitat for wildlife of all forms. I would hate to see
the whole character of this neighborhood change with the destruction of all the wetland
areas.
The pond behind my home has historically had a water level about 10 feet from my
flagpole. We have mowed the grass below this pole since we built our home in 1971P.
This past year the water level of this pond has been dramatically different. The low
ponding area on the east side of Schaefer Road which was on the former Rice property
was filled, and I believe the water now drains into the pond behind my home. We have
also had water pumped down the street from the backyards of other homes up Schaefer
Road. This run-off also drains into this pond. The pond water level during the spring,
summer, and fall of 1992 has been at the base of my flagpole. A rise in the level of several
feet. This level has continued to be high with the ice that is on the pond now. My
concern for what will happen to this pond and its impact on my property with the
proposed subdivision and building of so many new homes is very real. During the great
storm of 1987 we all had problems with the water, the pond level was high, and my whole
driveway in from Schaefer Road was under water. The pond level has not been as high
for an extended period of time as it was this year since 1987.
I have loved the character and charm of this neighborhood for the many years I have lived
here. I believed that the city was trying to preserve the integrity of the neighborhoods
with its new subdivision laws and the conservation easements. Please consider the impact
of the density of this subdivision on the water level in the ponds and the destruction of the
wildlife habitat.
Sincerely,
Evelyn Yo g
5016 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN. 55436
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
o:,
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
_SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 16, 1992
AGENDA ITEM IV -A .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 5000 dozen range balls for Braemar Golf Course
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1,
Spalding Sports Worldwide
1,
$25,150.00
2.
Tock, Ltd.
2,
$26,500.00
3.
Tower Tee Products
3.
$29,750.00
4.
Wilson Sporting Goods
4.
$31,250.00
5.
Ram :Golf ;)Corp. _
5.
$32,500.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Spalding Sports Worldwide $25,150.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
5000 dozen range balls of two piece construction for the Braemar
Golf Course driving range.
Sig�atur,,e
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Kenneth
Depart n
iget ohn Wallin,
losl nd, City Man ,
Director
° In: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE.
TO: Mayor Richards and-Council Members
FROM Bob Kojetin, Director .Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: December 16,. 1992
AGENDA ITEM IV.B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1993 Park and Recreation
Information Brochure
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Sexton Printing, Inc.
1.
$10,047.35
2. Bolger Publications
2.
$10,620.00
3. Northwest Printing
3.
$10,710.00
4. Graphic Design
4.
$11,025.00
5. Metro Printing
5.
$12,200.00
6. Saxton Printing
6.
$13,397.00
7. Color roof Printing
RECOMUENDED QUOTE OR BID:
.
$15.290.00
Sexton Printing, Inc. $10,047.35
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Annual activity brochure for the Park and Recreation Department.
g ure Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within.bu t ;Cfty lin, Fin ce Director
Kenneth Rosland ana ger
° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
g
TO: Mayor Richards and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
__SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE:. December 15, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV . C .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fertilizer for Braemar Golf Course
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Precision Turf 1. $11,850.62
2. Turf Supply Co. 2. $11,934.40
3 3.
4. 4.
5• 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Precision Turf $11,850.62
GENERAL INFORMATION: The following types of fertilizer are included
The Recommended bid is
ojr
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland. City
�t
Ilin, Fina ce Director
in the cost.
Per Ton
Total
ParEx 24 -4 -12 (12
tons)
$641.60 /ton
$
7,699.20
ParEx 21 -3 -16 (1
ton)
$939.20/ton
$
939.20
Leb 18 -4 -10 Naiad
(3 tons)
$716.00 /ton
$
2,148.00 .
Leb 8 -4 -24 Naiad
(2 tons)
$574.00 /ton
$
1,148.00
GRAND TOTAL.
$11,934.40
The Recommended bid is
ojr
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland. City
�t
Ilin, Fina ce Director
�o} REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: David A. Velde
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE December 21, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1993 Public Health Nursing service Contract
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Bloomington Division of Public Health 1• $133,020
2..
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
GENERAL INFORMATION: This contract is at the approved budget
expenditure level for 1993. This contract covers the costs
of sliding fee scale services delivered to Edina residents and
other cost for service which are not reimbursed by private
pay, insurance, medicare, and medicaid. Historically, the
city cost has been about 45 -490 of the total cost of
services delivered to Edina residents.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
._
within budget not
Kenneth
Department
d city
Director
9- "A. �tl\
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
72,
-4
Ham,
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
_SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE December 9, 1992
AGENDA NO. - W.E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Six (6) full -size police pursuit vehicles
Company Amount of Quote or i Nd
1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
2. Highway 61 and County Road F
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
3.
4.
5..
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
1. $77,138.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
Low bidder - Thane Hawkins
Polar Chevrolet
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Replacement vehicles (per State of Minnesota Purchasing Cooperative).
Acceptable replacement vehicles to be acquired through Cooperative
Purchasing process. Actual cost is the same as 1992 units and
approximately 1.3% less than 1991 purchases. Units will be used as f.izst=
line patrol vehicles for a minimum of two (2) years.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
X
within budget not
Police
Kenneth
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members
FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
_VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE . December 21, 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. F.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1993 BUICK LESABRE MANAGER REPLACEMENT VEHICLE
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Walser Buick 1. $18,290
2. Win Stephens 2. $18,330
3. Lenzen Buick 3. $18,396
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: Walser Buick at $18,290
GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement vehicle is. needed due to the
rear -end accident which totaled the Manager's car. The vehicle to be
replaced was a 1989 Buick LeSabre, and its insurance replacement value
is $7,975. Therefore, the net cost to the City is $10,315 with the
Walser Buick quote.
Sigrt4t6re
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Kenneth
REQUEST•FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR RICHARDS AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RALPH CAMPBELL, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE 21 DECEMBER 1992 AGENDA ITEM IV. G.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PRODUCTION SERVICES - ABOUT TOWN MAGAZINE
Company Amount of Quote or &d
�• J. PATRICK MOORE & COMPANY, INC. �• $11,500.00
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5r
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
J. PATRICK MOORE & COMPANY, INC.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Production services for Fall 1992 issue of "About Town" city
news magazine
%rIOP05WWA
The Recommended bid is
C�,1 Iti�
Department i
X
within budget not within budee-
491��r1;
4e��o N
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 21 December, 1992
Subject: Transportation Utility
Legislation
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # y-A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Review information for further discussion.
Info /Background:
The attached is information for your review. The issue is to
develop enabling legislation for a local transportation utility
similar to water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utilities. This
structure is meant to be used exclusively for transportation
issues. Staff will provide a short presentation on the issue
at the meeting.
13
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION
of MINNESOTA
November ••
Dear Colleague:
On November 20, 1992 Larry Read, Ron Rudrud, John Maczko and I presented the
Transportation Utility to the Minnesota Public Works Association (MPWA)
membership at its fall conference. Enclosed is a copy of the draft of
Transportation Utility position paper which will be presented to legislative
aides for development into legislation. Please review the draft and submit
proposed changes to me by December 4. Comments offered by Transportation
Committee members and MPWA members will be reviewed by Committee members at
its next meeting (tentatively scheduled for 9:00 a.m. December 16).
Also enclosed are copies of City Council resolutions of support for the
Transportation Utility adopted by the Cities of Brooklyn Center and
Minnetonka. It is requested you present the issue to your City Council or
organization for consideration and support. Please forward copies of your
City Council's or organization's resolution of support to me by January 7,
1993 so we can report the level of support at the City Engineers Association
winter conference on January 13 -15.
As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or
comments in regard to the information provided.
Sincerely,
C��
James N. Grube
Director of Public Works
JNG /sjk
ENCL
circulation: Sarah Hackett
Larry Anderson
Bill Barnhart
Dave Jessup
Mike Eastling
Dan Edwards
Julian Empson
Roger Peterson
Chuck Siggerud
Fran Hoffman
William Hansen
John Flora
Charlie Honchell
Mary Hoshaw
Ron Rudrud
Ken Larson
Steve Gatlin
Dale Swanson
John Maczko
James Schrantz
John Dolentz
Bill Sayre
Bill Ottensmann
Larry Read
Bruce Bullert
Tom Drake
Ken Saffert
Dave Sonnenberg
Tom Colbert
Sy Knapp
Keith Nelson
Richard Victor
DRAFT 11/92
ELEMENTS OF A TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the term "municipality" means a home rule charter
or statutory city. The term "governing body" means the city council.
Authorization. Authority for a municipality to impose a transportation utility fee is enabling
only. No municipality is required to use the fee. Only municipalities which follow the
procedures for adoption may impose the fee.
Procedures for adoption. The governing body of a municipality may impose a transportation
utility fee coterminous with its territorial limits, by ordinance adopted by a two- thirds vote of all
its members. No such fee shall be adopted until after a public hearing has been held on the
question. A notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be published for two
successive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality (or in a qualified newspaper of
general circulation in the municipality, and the last notice be at least seven days prior to the day
of the hearing. The ordinance, when adopted, shall be filed with the county, auditor and county
recorder.
Collection. An ordinance adopted under this authority shall provide for collection of the
transportation utility fee on a monthly, quarterly, or other basis as the municipality determines.
The municipality may use regular utility billings, for such services as water, sewer or
stormsewer, to implement the transportation utility charges. A municipality may provide for
certifying unpaid transportation utility fees to the county auditor against the property on which
the fee is imposed for collection.
The fee may be collected from all properties within the municipality. Properties which are
exempt from property taxes still be subject to the fee.
Master plan requirement. A municipality shall be allowed to use the transportation utility
only after preparation and adoption of a "master plan." A capital improvement plan (CIP),
public facilities plan, or comparable information and planning document providing a five year
program will qualify. The plan shall include information on proposed reconstruction, facility
upgrade, and maintenance expenditures. The plan must include information on the proposed
funding sources for all projects.
The governing body of a municipality may, by resolution of its members, adopt or revise the
master plan. The plan shall be annually updated to reflect a five year planning program: No
transportation utility fee be authorized without adoption of a master plan. A notice of the time,
place, and purpose of the hearing to adopt the master plan shall be published for two successive
i•
weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality, or in a qualified newspaper of general
circulation in the municipality, and the last notice be at least seven days prior to the day of the
hearing.
Use of fee proceeds. The proceeds of all transportation utility fees must be placed in a separate
fund and only used for the following eligible purposes which have been specified in the master
plan:
Reconstruction -- paving, grading, curb and gutter, bridge repair, overlays, drainage structures,
base work, subgrade correction and boulevard restoration.
Facility upgrade -- traffic signals, turn lanes, medians, street approaches, alleys, rights of way,
sidewalks, retaining walls, fence installation, additional traffic lanes.
Maintenance -- striping, seal coating, crack sealing, sidewalk maintenance, signal maintenance,
street light maintenance, signage.
The revenues generated by the fee may not be transferred to the general fund of the
municipality.
Trip generation data. Fees will be calculated based on the relationship of the revenues the
municipality proposed to generate and the trip generation rates by type of land use.
Land use category Unit Daily trip generation range
1. Residential
• single family
d.u.
7.5- 12.5
• apartment, townhouse
d.u.
4.5 - 7.5
highrise, mobile home
park, low rise condo
• retirement community,
d.u.
2.5-3.5.
congregate care,
recreational home
2. Lodging
* hotel/motel
rooms
7.0- 11.0
3. Schools
• elementary
students
0.5- 1.5
• secondary
students
1.0-2.0
• college /university students
2.0-3.0
2
It
Land use category Unit Daily jjp generation range
4. Services
• church/synagogue 1000 sq ft 7- 11
• library 34- 56
• day care center 50- 84
• government offices 50- 84
• post office 65-109
• state motor vehicle dept 125-207
• banks (walk/drive in) 188-312
5. Office
• hospital 1000 sq ft
13-21
• clinic (medical/dental) it
25-41
• general office bldg
535-891
0 - 50,000 sq ft
17-27
50-200,000
11 - 17
200 - 400,000
8-14
over 400,000
7-11
6. Retail
• low intensity 1000 sq ft
27- 45
• medium intensity
73- 121
• high intensity
535-891
• shopping center
10 - 50,000 sq ft
94-156
50- 100,000
60-100
100 - 200,000
47-77
200 - 600,000
32-52
over 600,000
24-40
7. Industrial
• general light/ ind pk
1000 sq st
5 - 9
• manufacturing/warehousing
3 - 5
8. Recreational
• city /county park
acres
2- 4
• golf course
of
6- 10
• beach/regional park
of
13-21
• other recreational
1000 sq ft
varies
9. Terminals
• commercial airport
pass. orig.
4- 6
• general aviation
3
Land use categ=
airport
• waterport/marine
terminal
• transit terminals
10. vacant
Unit Daily trip generation range
based craft 5 - 6
acres 9- 15
# of buses varies
0
Review. A municipality may also petition this committee to develop or review trip generation
data for land uses which are not included in the existing land use categories. The committee
may also annual review all ranges. The committee review and update trip generation data,
when necessary, whenever the Institute of Traffic Engineers issues a new edition of their traffic
generation manual.
Pass -by reduction. Reductions based on data from the Institute of Traffic Engineers for pass -by
trips have been made to the trip rate ranges calculated for the following property uses: services
(15 percent), low intensity retail (20 percent), shopping centers (40 percent), and high intensity
retail (50 percent). (Pass -by trips are made as intermediatestops on the way from a point of
origin to a primary destination. These trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an
adjacent street and do not require diversion from another roadway.)
TDM credit. A credit would be available for employers and building owners who implement
traffic demand strategies (TDM). Where lower traffic generation rates can be proven for two
consecutive years, the city will calculate an adjustment to the trip generation factor on which the
fee is based. Annual proof of reduced vehicle traffic would be required to maintain the credit.
Accrual of fee revenues. Revenues from the utility fee shall only be used for the specific
reconstruction, facility upgrade, and maintenance projects listed in master plan, and are therefore
limited to the projected costs of the needs approved in the master plan.. The dedicated fund may
not accumulate revenues from the utility fee beyond the fee revenues generated over a period of
five years.
Appeal process.
Property owner. An owner of property within the municipality may appeal the amount of the
fee or the trip generation rate which is used for that property. An administrative appeal may be
made to the administrative officer of the municipality. The decision of the administrative officer
may be appealed to the city council. The property owner may appeal the decision of the city
council to the district court.
Municipality. A municipality may appeal ranges of trip generation to the Municipal State Aid
Screening Committee appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation.
►, i
Special assessments, bonds, property tax levies. Use of the transportation utility fee does not
restrict the municipality from imposing special assessments, issuing bonded debt, or levying
property taxes to pay the costs of local street reconstruction, facility upgrade, or maintenance
projects. Revenue bonds may be issued in conjunction with the utility and may be retired with
utility fee revenues.
5
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -9358
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ENABLING LEGISLATION ALLOWING
MUNICIPALITIES TO ESTABLISH TRANSPORTATION UTILITIES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Minnetonka, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01. The cities of Minnesota are currently
experiencing large scale deterioration of the
local street systems.
1.02. Funding provided from the State Gasoline Tax
in the form of the Municipal State Aid Street
system is applicable to no more than 20
percent of any city's local street system.
1.03. Property taxes at the rates typically being
levied do not take into consideration the need
to rehabilitate and reconstruct city streets.
1.04. Under strict interpretation of Minnesota law
pertaining to special assessments, recent
court rulings have found that no benefit
accrues to fronting property when a
deteriorated street is reconstructed and have
struck down or significantly reduced special
assessment levies.
1.05. The streets under the jurisdiction of
Minnesota cities comprise an integral and
necessary component of the overall State
transportation network, reducing dependency on
the State and County systems.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01. Deteriorating city streets is a problem that
is occurring now and will continue to occur as
long as streets exist.
2.02. The funding sources currently available to
cities are totally inadequate to fund the
needed reconstruction and rehabilitation of
city streets.
H1 - A4
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 9358
Page two i
2.03. Funding provided by a Transportation Utility
would be based on a "user fee" concept, by
charging different categories of properties
different rates corresponding to the traffic
they generate.
2.04. Funding street reconstruction and
rehabilitation on a "user fee" basis is
consistent with the State of Minnesota's "user
fee" funding of transportation improvements
utilizing the Gasoline Tax.
Section 3. Council Action.
3.01. The City-Council of the City of Minnetonka
urges the members of the House of
Representatives and the Senate to support and
adopt legislation that would allow the cities
of Minnesota to establish Transportation
Utilities as the needs of their local streets
demand.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Minnetonka, Minnesota on
this "23rd day of March, 1992.
ATTEST:
Elizabe L. Norton, Cit Clerk
Action on this resolution
Motion for adoption:_ Hise
Seconded by: Anderson
voted in favor of:
Uias. Anderson Schneider, Berastedt
voted against: Burke Allendorf- Hanus
Abstained:
Absent:
Resolution adopted.
H - H=1
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -9358
Page three
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of
a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Minnetonka,
Minnesota at a duly authorized meeting held on the 23rd day of
March, 1992.
Elizabeth L. Morton, �Ity Clerk
A4 -'11
Member Philip Cohen introduced the follo,.:ing resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION i10. 92 -67
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LEGISLATION TO AUTHORIZE CITIES TO ESTABLISH
A TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
WHEREAS, the Minnesota legislature is considering legislation
which would authorize cities to create "Transportation Utilities "; and
WHEREAS, the Laague of Minnesota Cities (LKC) and the City
Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) have prepared and submitted concept
guidelines and information to the legislature in support of such legislation;
and
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Brooklyn Center City Council
that this City will be unable to meet its needs for reconstruction of local
streets unless a new funding source is made available; and
'WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Brooklyn Center City Council
that improvements must also be made to mass transit systems which will
facilitate the use of mass transit facilities for local transportation, and
that it would be proper to support such improvements with funding from a
0 transit utility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
I. this City endorses and supports proposed legislation which would
authorize cities to establish transportation utilities.
2, this City supports the concept and guidelines for establishment of
Transportation Utilities as developed and presented by the LMC and
the CEAM.
3, this City recommends that legislation which would authorize cities
to establish Transportation Utilities include authorization to
utilize funds from that source for improvements to the mass
transit system which are of direct benefit to city residents.
April 13, 1992
Date
?.TTc.ST.
Deputy ;.lerk
Todd Paulson, Mayor
2
•
RESOLUTION! NO. 92 -87
The notion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was dull seconded by
member Dave Rosene and upon voce being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
'Todd Paulson, Dave Rosene, and Philip Cohen;
and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
r!L �ql'Z4A. r�r
o e�
>4� � o
.0
•'N�bRPXM •
iaae
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
V* B*
From: David A. velde
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: December 21, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Tobacco Sales
0
To Council
Enforcement Report
Action
El
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
See Attached.
The purpose of this report is to explore the feasibility of
reducing access to tobacco products by minors. The ultimate goal
is to reduce the number of smokers by taking measures to discourage
people from starting to use tobacco products when they are young.
Background
The use of tobacco products is a risk taking behavior and lifestyle
choice which can cause premature death, disease, and disability.
The use of tobacco products usually begins at an early age prior to
ones eighteenth birthday. Tobacco use is a strong habit forming
activity, a habit which is very difficult to break.
About 24 percent of the state population smoke cigarettes. One of
the statewide public health goals is to reduce this percentage to
19 percent by the year 1996. One of the methods to accomplish this
goal will be to reduce the number of teenagers who begin smoking as
minors.
The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee recommended
that the city take a more aggressive role in enforcing the
prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors. The Committee
recommended that the city utilize a minor and a police officer to
attempt to purchase tobacco products in an inspection operation.
The committee also recommended that the tobacco sale license fee be
increased to $1,000 per year; that violations of the tobacco sale
to minors be punished by revocation of the license and that the
license fee be double for reapplication after the license has been
revoked.
Staff has been directed by the City Council to research the cost to
the city for more aggressive enforcement, research the proposed
annual license fee and consider other alternative mechanisms for
preventing tobacco sales to minors.
Discussion
Enforcement Cost
The cost of performing the inspection operation utilizing a minor
and an off duty police officer is as follows:
Off Duty Police Officer $35.00 per hour
Minor $10.00 per hour
Staff estimates that each inspection operation will take about two
hours to complete. This includes set up time, the actual contact .
and documentation after the operation. If this was done two times
a year for each licensee the cost would be:
4 hours total time
4 X 35.00 = $140.00 police officer
4 X 10.00 = $ 40.00 minor
Total Inspection Cost = $180.00
The cost of issuing the license is about $30.00 including postage,
forms and staff time. The total cost at a minimum_ would be $210.00
per year.
At the present time, the City issues 32 licenses per year and the
fee is $12.00 per annum.
Annual License Fee
The fee proposed by the Committee was $1000.00 per annum. Legal
counsel believes that the Court would find this fee to be excessive
and that the city would be held accountable at our cost for issuing
the license and other related costs incurred by routine inspection.
At a minimum, the license fee for tobacco sales should be $30.00.
However, if the City were to proceed with the enforcement
activities recommended by the committee, the license fee should be
increased to $250.00 per year. This fee would include the cost of
issuing the license, the. costs of the inspection operation, and
additional administrative costs associated with taking action on
the licensee when the licensee repeatedly sells tobacco products to
minors.
Other Methods
Consideration was given to the idea of operating the inspection
operation using residents as witnesses instead of Police Officers.
Legal counsel was uncomfortable with this method because of legal
issues surrounding the possible license revocation process and the
potential for problems if the city were to charge the licensee for
violation of state law.
Legal Counsel emphasized the fact that the underage purchaser used
in the inspection operation appear to be no older than 16 years to
avoid accusations of entrapment.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Susan Wohlrabe
Date: December 21, 1992
Subject: ANNUAL DINNER MEETING
OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
v • c
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
That the City Council select one of the following dates for the Annual Dinner
Meeting to be held at Centennial Lakes Centrum Building at 6:00 PM:
TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1993
OR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1993
A.
o e„
En
BOB
."te9 •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To; Mayor Richards and City Council.
y y
Agenda Item #
v . D .
From: Bob Kojetin
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: December 15, 1992
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Beaver Removal
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Recommend authorization for discharging a firearm in the City of Edina for
removal of beavers by the Critter Control Company.
Info/Background-
The three areas to control are the Weber Park area, Bredesen Park area and
Arden Park area.
We have contacted Critter Control, who are authorized by the DNR, to remove the
beavers from these three problem areas. At this time, I am asking for
permission from the City Council to give Critter Control a permit from the City
of Edina authorizing them to discharge a firearm in the City of Edina to remove
beavers from these three sites. Critter Control has also been working on
removing the beavers by trapping and the last resort is discharging a firearm.
For your information, this fall we have taken 10 beavers out of Edina. Seven
at Braemar, two at Weber and one on Sally Lane.
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT IT IS FITTING
AND PROPER TO DEFEND MAYOR RICHARDS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE AUFDERHEIDE LITIGATION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
"City "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The City and Mayor Richards, individually, have been
named as defendants in connection with an action brought in Federal District
Court (the "Action ") by James and Regina Aufderheide (the "Plaintiffs ")
alleging that Section 815 of the City Code impermissably bars the Plaintiffs
from placing an eight foot diameter satellite dish antenna on the roof of
their home, and seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, damages and costs
and attorneys' fees. Minnesota Statutes Section 466.07 provides that the City
shall defend and indemnify any of its officers and employees, whether elective
or appointive, for damages, including punitive damages, claimed or levied
against the officer or employee, provided that the officer or employee (i) was
acting in the performance of the duties of the position, and (ii) was not
guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith. The
City and Mayor Richards have submitted a claim with respect to the Action
under the public officials liability insurance policy of the City and the
insurer has agreed to defend the City and Mayor Richards in the Action,
subject to a reservation of rights. Such insurance policy contains a $15,000
deductible. A copy of the Summons and Complaint commenting the Action and all
correspondence received by the City from the Plaintiffs and their attorneys
has been submitted to and reviewed by this Council.
2. Findings and Determinations. Based upon review of the Summons and
Complaint commencing the Action and other information available to the City,
and based upon the best interest of the City, it is hereby found and
determined by the Council that:
(a) the naming of Mayor Richards as a defendant in the Action arose out
of the performance of his duties and position as Mayor of the City and
there has been no malfeasance in office or wilful or wanton neglect of
duties by Mayor Richards; and
(b) it is fitting and proper for the City to defend Mayor Richards in
the Action and for the City to pay all costs of the defense of Mayor
Richards not covered by the public officials liability insurance policy.
3. Reasons for Determination. The reasons for the determinations under
Section 2 hereof is that the naming of Mayor Richards as a defendant in the
Action has arisen solely from his position as Mayor, and the Summons and
Complaint and other material submitted to the City by the Plaintiffs or their
attorneys do not contain any allegations or assertions that Mayor Richards has
acted improperly in any fashion.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK '
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 21, 1992, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of December 22, 1992.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
12/18/92 12:13 FAX 612 340 2868 DORSEY . WHITNEY 16002
AGENDA ITEM V.E
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan
DATE: December 17,1992
RE: Aufderheide vs. City of Edina, et al. - Adoption of
Resolution Related to Defense of Mayor Richards
I have prepared for consideration by the City Council at its meeting on
December 21st a form of resolution determining that it is "fitting and proper" for the
City to defend Mayor Richards in the Aufderheide litigation.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.07, subdivision 1, provides as follows:
"Indemnification required. Subject to the limitations in section
466.04, a municipality or an instrumentality of a municipality shall
defend and indemnify any of its officers and employees, whether
elective or appointive, for damages, including punitive damages,
claimed or levied against the officer or employee, provided that the
officer or employee:
(1) was acting in the performance of the duties of the position;
and _
(2) was not guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of
duty, or bad faith."
This section provides that the City shall defend an officer for damages
claimed against the officer if the officer was acting in the performance of the duties
of the position and was not guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty or
bad faith. Case law in Minnesota interpreting this section indicates that the City
should make a determination that it is "fitting and proper" to provide defense and
indemnity to an officer or employee pursuant to this section. In making this
determination the City may consider such factors as may be reasonably relevant and
helpful in reaching a conclusion. In reaching the conclusion the City Council
should state in writing the reasons for its decision.
DoESEY 8C WHITNEY
A �•w�•'ISi 1.Mn1111•l \CLI.'lNTlll 11M1j`yr�.M..1. �1�,1..��111wTi�w.
12/18/92 12:13 FAX 612 340 2868 DORSEY . WHITNEY
lQ 003
or-a
In the Aufderheide litigation there has been no allegation of any
wrongdoing or improper conduct by Mayor Richards and the only reason he has
been named as a defendant is because of his position as Mayor. As you are aware a
claim has been submitted to the City's public officials liability insurance carrier with
respect to the litigation and the City has been notified that the insurer will defend
the City and Mayor Richards entirely in this action. Since the policy has a $15,000
deductible, up to $15,000 of the costs of defense of the City and Mayor Richards will
be paid by the City. It is expected that a motion will be made shortly before Judge
Kyle to dismiss Mayor Richards from the litigation. .
It is recommended that the resolution that it is "fitting and proper" to
defend Mayor Richards be adopted at this time. In Section 2 of the resolution
contains the determination that it is "fitting and proper" for the City to defend
Mayor Richards and the reasons for this determination are set forth in Section 3 of
the resolution.
-2-
DORSEY & WHITNEY
.1 I�w N7'r�YN.•���• 9XC6V4A11i4 �M •v.aN•K.�f. l�OYMlNnly �w�
12/18/92 12:13 FAX 612 340 2868 DORSEY . WHITNEY 1Q 004
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT IT IS FITTING
AND PROPER TO DEFEND MAYOR RICHARDS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE AUFDERHEIDE LITIGATION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the "City"), as follows:
1. Recitals. The City and Mayor Richards, individually, have been
named as defendants in connection with an action brought in Federal District Court
(the "Action ") by James and Regina Aufderheide (the "Plaintiffs ") alleging that .
Section 815 of the City Code impermissably bars the Plaintiffs from placing an eight
foot diameter satellite dish antenna on the roof of their home, and seeking
injunctive and declaratory relief, damages and costs and attorneys' fees. Minnesota
Statutes Section 466.07 provides that the City shall defend and indemnify any of its
officers and employees, whether elective or appointive, for damages, including
punitive damages, claimed or levied against the officer or employee, provided that
the officer or employee (i) was acting in the performance of the duties of the
position, and (ii) was not guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty, or
bad faith. The City and Mayor Richards have submitted a claim with respect to the
Action under the public officials liability insurance policy of the City and the insurer
has agreed to defend the City and Mayor Richards in the Action, subject to a
reservation of rights. Such insurance policy contains a $15,000 deductible. A copy of
the Summons and Complaint commencing the Action and all correspondence
received by the City from the Plaintiffs and their attorneys has been submitted to
and reviewed by this Council.
2. Findings and Determinations. Based upon review of the Summons
and Complaint commencing the Action and other information available to the City,
and based upon the best interests of the City, it is hereby found and determined by
the Council that:
(a) the naming of Mayor Richards as a defendant in the Action
arose out of the performance of his duties and position as Mayor of the
City and there has been no malfeasance in office or willful or wanton
neglect of duties by Mayor Richards; and
(b) it is fitting and proper for the City to defend Mayor Richards
in the Action and for the City to pay all costs of the defense of Mayor
Richards not covered by the public officials liability insurance policy.
3. Reasons for Determination. The reasons for the determinations
under Section 2 hereof is that the naming of Mayor Richards as a defendant in the
Action has arisen solely from his position as Mayor, and the Summons and
Complaint and other material submitted to the City by the Plaintiffs or their
attorneys do not contain any allegations or assertions that Mayor Richards has acted
improperly in any fashion.
November 27, 1992
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424
Dear Sirs,
As an Edina resident who may be forced to stare out at a huge
roof - mounted satellite dish located atop the Aufderheide
residence (5325 West 62nd St.), I would sincerely appreciate an
explanation why the City council has reversed its original
decision on the Aufderheide variance and, preferrably, a copy of
the "findings of fact for denial" report which, obviously, swayed
the council's final decision on this issue.
I understand that the Aufderheide's have filed a federal suit
which cites an FCC preemptive order on satellite reception but,
why has the City given up so easily on this case, before the suit
can be decided. Does the City not think a "defined aesthetic
objection" has been violated against the many neighbors who have
testified either verbally or in writing?
I invite the City to examine my property to see just how large a
structure would be necessary on my roof would I decide to erect
such a dish. I submit, I would need a dish 15 feet above by roof
peak. Is that what the FCC had intended? Is that what the City
of Edina is voluntarily allowing? It would make sense to me that
a party who knowingly moves into a maturely wooded neighborhood,
planning all along to erect a large satellite dish against
established ordinances, that said party would think twice about
such a move and consider the potential friction an unnatural
visual obstruction such as this might cause.
I moved to Edina in 1990 due in part to the City's reputation as
being receptive and responsive to its' residence and for the
natural tranquility of its neighborhoods. I think strongly that
this particular satellite dish severely compromises that natural
tranquility in this neighborhood
As indicated by City attorney, Mr. Jerry Gilligan, the council's
decision to grant this variance would likely not stop this
lawsuit. So, why disregard your sound original principles so
quickly? Do I have enough of the proper information on this
issue? Is my disappointment shared by anyone else? I think I
need some answers and would sincerely appreciate a response!
Regards,
D g�
&ou gyp
M�aiial
5320 Maddox Lane
AGENDA ITEM VIII.A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR
DATE: December 3, 1992
As you are aware, several changes are in the offing within the supervisory
ranks of the Police Department. Both the Deputy Chief, Leonard Kleven, and
Chief Craig Swanson plan to retire in 1993 and 1994 respectively.
With this prospect, I have discussed with them a process to select a new
management team. The intent is to begin early in 1993, make both selections
and move those persons into the positions as.they become vacant.
What you may not know is that Craig Swanson has recently made some changes in
his life style which prompts this memorandum. He has sold both his home and
recreational property and has purchased a home in Wright County and a condo in
Edina. These steps were a part of this pre - retirement plan and occurred
somewhat ahead of his personal schedule.
Given these changes, Craig reports that he finds it increasingly difficult to
devote the necessary time and energy he thinks is necessary for the position
of Chief of Police. He would be more comfortable with a normal 40- hour -a -week
job. Also, he suggests that his stepping -down at this time would permit the
new Chief and Deputy Chief to take office at the same time as Len Kleven's
retirement.
During late October, Craig advised me of his feelings and suggested two
alternatives. Given his tenure as a Police Officer, he could "bump" back into
the rank and file and exercise his seniority for various positions. The
training officer position is open in 1993 and 1994, and he could work in that
position to establish his retirement credits through 1994.
Secondly, Craig responded to several staff conversations that he had been a
part of regarding the function and composition of the Traffic Safety
Committee. Those conversations suggested either a citizen commission hear
traffic safety matters or they be brought directly to the Council. In either
case, a staff person would be necessary to manage this information and perform
the work. Currently, the Police Department performs the Traffic Safety staff
function with the Chief, Deputy Chief, officers, secretaries and CSO's. His
proposal is to consolidate all the duties into a singular coordinator
position. Additionally, he suggests the coordinator become somewhat proactive
-2-
and work with the Council to establish policies, procedures and possibly a
traffic safety section of the City Code. During this period, I also think we
could count on Craig to evaluate the program and make recommendations as to it
remaining a Police function or changed to an engineering or planning matter.
He certainly has the skills and experience to perform the rcle.
Incidental to such a change would be making Len Kleven the Chief until June of
1993 when he retires. During Januar-; through June, the new Chiefs could be
selected and other organizational changes made. Several t-. -usand dollars of
salary savings will be realized by Craig's reduction in salary and not
replacing positions until mid -year.
I did not conceive the plan nor did I expect Craig Swanson's desire to step
down from his Chief's position. However, it i'_oes provide the opportunity to
select and install a management team in the rolice Department that will
Drovide leadership for the next 15 or 20 years. Also, i` will place an
experienced and-capable employee into the tra =fic safet-- _ale which deeds
immediate attention.
I plan to proceed on this matter after receiving your questions and comments.
1
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 1
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132237
12/21/92,
$459.52
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$107.54
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$134.42
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$459.52
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$53.77
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$245.00
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$144.29
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$95.91
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
GOLF DOME
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$322.62
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$425.87
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
BUILDING & GRO
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$36.75
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$63.63
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$159.22
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH
REMOV
12/21/92
$26.88
AAGARD
RUBBISH REMOVAL
DECEMBER
GUN RANGE
RUBBISH
REMOV
< *>
52,734.94*
132238
12/21/92
$100.00
ABBEY MEDICAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0055042
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$85.00
ABBEY MEDICAL
REPAIR PARTS
0054843
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
4162
< *>
$185.00*
132239
12/21/92
$2,475.00
ACCESS ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
111792
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,475.00*
132240
12/21/92
$18.35
ACTION MESSENGER
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
98154
ADMINISTRATION
SVC CONTR EQU
,< *>
$18.35*
132241
12/21/92
$3,051.62
ADVANCED STATE SECUR
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
9908
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. &
EQUIP
4945
< *>
$3,051.62*
132242
12/21/92
$8.98
AIRSIGNAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
3559549
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$8.98*
132243
12/21/92
$9.05
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
171371
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
3757
< *>
$9.05*
132244
12/21/92
$54.00
ALL MINNESOTA SPORTS
ADVERTISING OTHER
NOVEMBER
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
5203
12/21/92
$54.00
ALL MINNESOTA SPORTS
ADVERTISING OTHER
DECEMBER
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
5204
< *>
$108.00*
132245
12/21/92
$121.75
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ACCESSORIES
008703
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4853
< *>
$121.75*
132246
12/21/92
$198.90
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$186.59
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$12.46
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$69.11
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$98.66
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
50TH ST SELLIN
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$60.97
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
NOVEMBER
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$25.19
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113092/0
GRILL
LAUNDRY
<*>
S651.88*
132247
12/21/92
$60.00
ANDERSON, CHERI
PROGRAM /EDINBOROUGH 1
120792
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC
OTHER
< *>
$60.00*
132248
12/21/92
$57.73
ANDERSON, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121592
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL
SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 2
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$57.73*
132249
12/21/92
$495.00
ARNOLD BING PLUMBING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
120792
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$495.00*
132250
12/21/92
$311,959.96
ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -10/ #2
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$311,959.96*
132251
12/21/92
$400.25
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
48125
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOO
5215
12/21/92
$76.85
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
51160
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
5038
12/21/92
$31.50
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
51407
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$508.60*
132252
12/21/92
$81.13
ASTLEFORD INTL
REPAIR PARTS
A -91906
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4789
< *>
$81.13*
132253
12/21/92
$28.89
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
51941409
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.89*
132254
12/21/92
$13.35
AT &T CONS PROD DIV
TELEPHONE
1125
PUMP & L'IFT ST
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$14.68
AT &T CONS PROD DIV
TELEPHONE
112692
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.03*
132255
12/21/92
$5.49
AT &T
TELEPHONE
113092
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
<*>
$5.49*
132256
12/21/92
$133.00
AUDIOVISUAL INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
70460
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
4097
< *>
$133.00*
132257
12/21/92
$29.95
AWD COOLERS OF MINNE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
51341
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.95*
132258
12/21/92
$18.46
AXT -LYLE
'COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
121592
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$18.46*
~ 132259
12/21/92
$50.15
B & B SEAT COVERS
ACCESSORIES
14124
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4892
12/21/92
$35.65
B & B SEAT COVERS
REPAIR PARTS
14142
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4996
< *>
$85.80*
132260
12/21/92
$188.84
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
224082
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL.SUPPL
4817
12/21/92
$113.53
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
ACCESSORIES
224534
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4844
12/21/92
- $40.00
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
225290
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$36.60
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
228173
RANGE
REPAIR PARTS
5082
< *>
$298.97*
132261
12/21/92
$324.50
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
022588
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
4555
< *>
$324.50*
132262
12/21/92
$350.50
BENNETT, KATHRYN
ART WORK SOLD
121092
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$350.50*
132263
12/21/92
$149.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
50TH NOV
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
12/21/92
$324.65
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
YORK NOV
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ.
12/21/92
$378.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
VERNON N
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
< *>
$852.15*
r
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 3
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132264
12/21/92
$59.90
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
845015
ART CENTER ADM
OFFICE SUPPLI
12/21/92
$164.72
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
845015
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLI
12/21/92
$73.21
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
846153
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5037
12/21/92
$17.51
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
846340
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLI
5032
12/21/92
$40.38
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
846677
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5196
12/21/92
- $25.27
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CM846153
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$32.23
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848040
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$6.11
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848040
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$11.14
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848040
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$4.05
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848040
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$11.96
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848055
50TH ST SELLIN
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$11.96
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
848055
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$407.90*
132265
12/21/92
$25.51
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
033303
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$25.51*
132266
12/21/92
$4,545.13
BFI OF MN INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
921100 -1
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,545.13*
132267
12/21/92
$34,233.55
BFI RECYCLING SYS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
721100 -7
RECYCLING
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$34,233.55*
132268
12/21/92
$24.68
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
BLACKTOP
063358
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
< *>
$24.68*
132269
12/21/92
$503.00
BJORKS COUNTRY STONE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
083192
GENERAL MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$503.00*
132270
12/21/92
$250.33
BLUMBERG PHOTO
REPAIR PARTS
BM93336-
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
3989
< *>
$250.33*
132271
12/21/92
$157.52
BOYER TRUCKS
ACCESSORIES
182010
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4891
12/21/92
$108.80
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
183134
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5002
< *>
$266.32*
132272
12/21/92
$112.50
BRADLEY BENN
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
12/21/92
$350.00*
BRADLEY BENN
ART WORK SOLD
121592
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
132273
12/21/92
$66.79
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
264587
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPP
< *>
$66.79*
132274
12/21/92
$33.76
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59157601
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
4758
12/21/92
$435.20
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59175001
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPL
4827
< *>
$468.96*
132275
12/21/92
$45.00
BRUMFIELD ADRIANE
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
12/21/92
$69.30
BRUMFIELD ADRIANE
ART WORK SOLD
121592
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$114.30*
132276
12/21/92
$38.72
BUELL, PAUL
CONT ED /POLICE
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$38.72*
132277
12/21/92
$5.76
BUSINESS RECD CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8794290
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$5.76*
132278
12/21/92
$265.47
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
144377
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
4668
< *>
$265.47*
132279
12/21/92
$170.00
C.E.L. PUBLIC RELATI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
120792
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
<*>
$170.00*
132280
12/21/92
$67,089.00
C.F. HAGLIN & SONS
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -9/ #1
UTILITIES -HRA
CIP
< *>
$67,089.00*
!32281
12/21/92
$18,508.14
C.S. MCCROSSAN CONST
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -9/ #4
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
< *>
$18,508.14*
132282
12/21/92
$364.23
CADY COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
218
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$364.23*
132283
12/21/92
$85.40
CALLAHAN,FRAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121192
PUBLIC HEALTH
MILEAGE
*
*
132284
12/21/92
$2,630.32
CARGILL INC.
SALT
800222
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
12/21/92
$1,314.74
CARGILL INC.
SALT
800223
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
<*>
$3,945.06*
132285
12/21/92
$176.39
CASWELL INTERNL CORP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
027127
GUN RANGE
CONTR REPAIRS
4811
< *>
$176.39*
132286
12/21/92
$306.30
CATCO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
305280
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
4784
12/21/92
$116.10
CATCO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
305541
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4896
< *>
$422.40*
132287
12/21/92
$34.17
CELLULAR ONE SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
001956
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$215.38
CELLULAR ONE SERVICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
002752
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$249.55*
.132288
12/21/92
$71.45
CELLULAR ONE
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
120592/K
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
12/21/92
ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120592/P
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$$74.57* CELLULAR
132289
12/21/92
$343.44
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
44972
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
5113
< *>
$343.44*
132290
12/21/92
$160.97*
CERTIFIED POWER TRAI
ACCESSORIES
099778
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5008
132291
12/21/92
$64.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$383.40
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$447.40*
132292
12/21/92
$295.00
CITY OF ST PAUL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
027859
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$295.00*
132293
12/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
38272
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
12/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
38273
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
12/21/92
$13.50
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
38274
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 5
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$40.50*
132294
12/21/92
$97.63
CLUBKID
ADVERTISING OTHER
120992
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$97.63*
132295
12/21/92
$535.30
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$530.57
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$421.63
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
<*>
$1,487.50*
132296
12/21/92
$105.90
COFFEE INN
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
52062
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
5197
< *>
$105.90*
132297
12/21/92
$532.50
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6463
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
< *>
$532.50*
132298
12/21/92
$25.00
CONNOLLY, BOB
VISUAL ARTS 12 /29 /EDI
111392
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
<*>
$25.00*
132299
12/21/92
$309.79
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17983
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
4824
< *>
$309.79*
132300
12/21/92
$340.80
CONSTRUCTION MATERIA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
009061
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPL
5200
< *>
$340.80*
132301
12/21/92
$420.68
CONTACT MOBILE COMM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25715
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
4411
< *>
$420.68*
132302
12/21/92
$57.88
COUGAR SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110706
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5079
< *>
$57.88*
132303
12/21/92
$380.00
COURTNEY, C WAYNE
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$380.00*
132304
12/21/92
$27.40
CULLIGAN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
113092
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICE
< *>
$27.40*
132305
12/21/92
$439.03
CURTIN MATHESON SCIE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0479141
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
4987
< *>
$439.03*
132306
12/21/92
$38.98
D.C. HEY CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
79009A
ART CENTER BLD
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$38.98*
132307
12/21/92
$59.40
DAEHN, MARCELLA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121192
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
12/21/92
$26.00
DAEHN, MARCELLA
MEETING EXPENSE
121192
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
12/21/92
$4.62
DAEHN, MARCELLA
GUARD RAIL MATERIAL
121192
ELECTION
GUARD RAIL MA
< *>
$90.02*
132308
12/21/92
$110.00
DAKOTA PLUMBING
PLUMBING PERMITS
120892
GENERAL FD PRO
PLUMBING PERM
< *>
$110.00*
132309
12/21/92
$60.80
DANIEL SMITH
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
7096391
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
4669
< *>
$60.80*
132310
12/21/92
$160.00
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$160.00*
132311
12/21/92
$89.27
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
33498
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4591
12/21/92
$89.27
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
34101
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4791
12/21/92
$470.13
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
34265
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4358
12/21/92
$460.08
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34479
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
4785
< *>
$1,108.75*
132312
12/21/92
$88388.88* 00
DCA.INC
HOSPITALIZATION
005131
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
132313
12/21/92
$66.04
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
REPAIR PARTS
98032
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
4960
*
*
132314
12/21/92
$73.00
DISPATCH COMM /MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102360
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$80.94
DISPATCH COMM /MN
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
23913
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$153.94*
132315
12/21/92
$20.00
DISPATCH MONTHLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121092
CIVIL DEFENSE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$20.00*
132316
12/21/92
$7.80
DIST LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
111192
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$70.50
DIST LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
111292
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
< *>
$78.30*
132317
12/21/92
$260.00
DORSEY & WHITNEY
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
299326
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$260.00*
132318
12/21/92
$50.00
DUMBACKER, STEVE
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120892
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$50.00*
132319
12/21/92
$307.12
DUTCH GARDENS
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
92 -43247
BUILDING & GRO
TREES FLWR SH
4161
< *>
$307.12*
-- 132320
12/21/92
$350.50
DVORAK, MARY
ART WORK SOLD
121092
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$350.50*
132321
12/21/92
$395.48
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL. SUPPLIES
31412
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$565.35
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIALS
32265
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIAL
< *>
$960.83*
132322
12/21/92
$49.61
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
0381469
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
4948
< *>
$49.61*
132323
12/21/92
$70.03
EAGLE ELEVATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
5906
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$70.03*
132324
12/21/92
$132.07
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
639262
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
.
12/21/92
$88.60
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
639258
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$220.67*
132325
12/21/92
$196.17
EARL F. ANDERSON
PAINT
120512
PAVEMENT MARKI
PAINT
4828
< *>
$196.17*
132326
12/21/92
$8,313.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE,NOV
YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 7
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132326
12/21/92
$141.90
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$3,867.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$190.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$228.60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$9,147.80
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< ■>
$21,889.80"
132327
12/21/92
$85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
2032688
BUILDING & GRO
SVC CONTR EQU
12/21/92
$100.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
2032683
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
<•>
$185.00"
132328
12/21/92
8.75 ED
E98
PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
62351
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
�
132329
12/21/92
$818.60
ED'S WOOD PRODUCTS
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
003275
GC CIP
CIP 4378
12/21/92
$830.70
ED'S WOOD PRODUCTS
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
003275
GC CIP
CIP 4378
132 330
12/21/92
$
EDINA TRAVEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
121192
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
301.00
132331
12/21/92
$68.75
FAIRVIEW
MYRNA FRANKSAWARZ
103092
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
<•>
$68.75"
132332
12/21/92
$1,750.00
FARRELL, SUSAN
ART WORK SOLD
121092
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
<•>
' $1,750.00"
132333
12/21/92
$48.57
FAST 1.HOUR PHOTO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112992
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$48.57"
132334
12/21/92
$30.00
FAST FRAME
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
947227.
HUMAN RELATION
PRO SVC OTHER
12/21/92
$287.87
FAST FRAME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
947635
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$170.19
FAST FRAME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1114505
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$24.00
FAST FRAME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1114549
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$134.30
FAST FRAME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1114550
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$48.60
FAST FRAME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1114569
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
<+� >
$694.96"
132335
12/21/92
$1,137.40
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL
4779
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
<•>
$1,137.40"
132336
12/21/92
$59.00
FELTON, ERIC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
12/21/92
$48.66
FELTON, ERIC
MEETING EXPENSE
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPEN
12/21/92
$44.28
FELTON, ERIC
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
12/21/92
$121.23
FELTON, ERIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$55.11
FELTON, ERIC
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
12/21/92
$6.58
FELTON. ERIC
AMMUNITION
121592
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
< ■>
$334.86"
132337
12/21/92
$24.00
FINE GARDENING
SUBSCRIPTION /PARK & R
121192
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCR
< ■>
• $24.00"
132338
12/21/92
$26,025.00
FIRST TRUST
INTEREST BONDS
83331 00
IBR 82 PROG
INTEREST BOND
12/21/92
$300,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND PRINCIPLE EXPENS
83331 00
IBR #2 PROG
BOND PRINCIPL
12/21/92
$100,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BONDS PAYABLE
83325 01
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132338
12/21/92
$39,150.00
FIRST TRUST
INTEREST BONDS
83325 01
ADMINISTRATION
INTEREST BOND
12/21/92
S,70,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BONDS PAYABLE
23 83325
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/21/92
$72,563.75
FIRST TRUST
INTEREST BONDS
23 83325
ADMINISTRATION
INTEREST BOND
12/21/92
$5,825.00
FIRST TRUST
BONDS PAYABLE
23 83325
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/21/92
$20,352.55
FIRST TRUST
INTEREST BONDS
23 83325
ADMINISTRATION
INTEREST BOND
12/21/92
$19,175.00
FIRST TRUST
BONDS PAYABLE
23 83325
ICE ARENA PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/21/92
$66,997.45
FIRST TRUST
INTEREST BONDS
23 83325
ARENA ADMINIST
INTEREST BOND
12/21/92
$423,478.75
FIRST TRUST
DUE FROM HRA
23 83325
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
12/21/92
$160,000.00
FIRST TRUST
DUE FROM HRA
23 83325
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$1,303,567.50*
132339
12/21/92
$1,123.00
FLAGLER, JOHN J
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
00265
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
<�>
$1,123.00*
132340
12/21/92
$81.87
FOUR SEASON SILK PLA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
02880
BUILDING,& GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$81.87*
132341
12/21/92
$31.86
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
512430
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
4751
12/21/92
$31.90
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
521430
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
5085
< *>
$63.76*
132342
12/21/92
$3,358.00
FRANK B HALL & CO
INSURANCE
091839
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$3,358.00*
132343
12/21/92
$777.03
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112092 /P
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$507.21
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112092/P
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$94.84
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112092/P
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$307.73
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112092/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$382.32
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112092/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$560.74
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
112092/P
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
12/21/92
$37.73
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
1120
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
< *>
$2,667.60*
132344
12/21/92
$750.20
G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
120792
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
�. < *>
$750.20*
132345
12/21/92
$250.00
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$250.00*
132346
12/21/92
$33.00
GEM TAP SERV
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
113092
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$33.00*
132347
12/21/92
$824.74
GENERAL REPAIR SERV
REPAIR PARTS
28163
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
4855
< *>
$824.74*
132348
12/21/92
$600.00
GEREBI, LIZ
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
132349
12/21/92
$183.60
GET /GO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
7037
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOO
5158
< *>
$183.60*
132350
12/21/92
$183,156.09
GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVA
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -11 /b2
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$183,156.09*
132351
12/21/92
$28.28
GOPHER HEATING & SHE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2718
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
4726
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58
PM
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$28.28*
132352
12/21/92
$750.00
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10457080
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
4794
12/21/92
$19.67
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR PARTS
104 -5802
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
4794
12/21/92
$151.39
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR PARTS
104 -5841
BUILDING & GRO
REPAIR PARTS
4794
12/21/92
$186.73
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10458271
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
- $585.00
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10458741
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$522.79*
132353
12/21/92
$222.00
GUST, MARGARET
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$222.00*
132354
12/21/92
$320.00
GUSTAFSON, KATHY
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$320.00*
132355
12/21/92
$88.65
HALLMAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
143474
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
4764
<*>
$88.65*
132356
12/21/92
$40.00
HALVORSON, JIM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
121592
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$40.00*
132357
12/21/92
$468.55
HARMON GLASS & GLAZE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40027602
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
5092
12/21/92
$117.50
HARMON GLASS & GLAZE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40027985
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
4768
<*>
$586.05*
132358
12/21/92
$346.48
HARMON GLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
72001682
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
4886
< *>
$346.48*
132359
12/21/92
$67.05
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
120292
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$67.05*
132360
12/21/92
$19,564.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY
SHER
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
120292
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACE
12/21/92
$23,506.02
HENNEPIN COUNTY
SHER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
120292
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$43,070.02*
132361
12/21/92
$135.83
HENNEPIN COUNTY
SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
120892
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$135.83*
132362
12/21/92
$274.54
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREA
RUBBISH REMOVAL
22107
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOV
< *>
$274.54*
132363
12/21/92
$1,200.00
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL
C
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
033816
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$1,200.00*
132364
12/21/92
$7,061.37
HENSEL, DEDE
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
121192
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$7,061.37*
132365
12/21/92
$171.00*
HERIMER MOTEL
LODGING RM 208 REG 18
113092
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
132366
12/21/92
$1,680.00
HERNANDEZ, LUIS
PERSONAL SERVICES
121592
GOLF DOME
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$1,680.00*
132367
12/21/92
$58.52
HINTON, LAURA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
120292
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
< *>
$58.52*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132368
12/21/92
$28.76
HOOTENS
LAUNDRY
110692
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
< *>
$28.76*
132369
12/21/92
HUB HOBBY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1051
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL
SUPPL
'k
*
$772.45
132370
12/21/92
15HYDRO
SUPPLY
CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
5315
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
8536
$215.15A
132371
12/21/92
IDELLES
INTER DESN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
35739
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL
SUPPL
5194
*
$499.49 *
132372
12/21/92
$70.00
INGMAN
LAB INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
111792
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICE
4779
< *>
$70.00*
132373
12/21/92
$275.00
INSTITUTE
FOR ATHLET
PROFESSIONAL
SVC - OT
120192
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC
OTHER
< *>
$275.00*
132374
12/21/92
$4,533.42
J PATRICK
MOORE CO
ADVERTISING OTHER
1020
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
5219
< *>
$4,533.42*
132375
12/21/92
$40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE
OR ALLOWANCE
121592
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$40.00*
132377
12/21/92
$27.69
JERRYS
HARDWARE
TOOLS
NOVEMBER
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
12/21/92
$32.11
JERRYS
HARDWARE
TOOLS
NOVEMBER
SEWER CLEANING
TOOLS
12/21/92
$65.19
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR
PARTS
NOVEMBER
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$67.75
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$197.23
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$13.69
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$240.65
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$155.57
JERRYS
HARDWARE
DUE FROM HRA
NOVEMBER
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
12/21/92
$99.20
JERRYS
HARDWARE
DUE FROM HRA
NOVEMBER
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$5.52
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPL
---
12/21/92
$21.75
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$38.74
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$57.01
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$137.71
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$0.84
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$6.75
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$51.49
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
PARK MAINTENAN
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$38.78
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$73.72
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$23.59
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
GOLF DOME
GENERAL
SUPPL
12/21/92
$3.25
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NOVEMBER
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL
SUPPL
< *>
$1,358.23*
132378
12/21/92
$265.99
JERRYS
PRINTING
ADVERTISING
OTHER
12300
COMMUNICATIONS
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$265.99*
132379
12/21/92
$154.12
JIM HATCH SALES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
2025
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPL
4842
< *>
$154.12*
132380
12/21/92
$2,321.00
JOE BREY ROOFING
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
120992
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,321.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132381
12/21/92
$57.63
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
8034712
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$15.33
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
8035842
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$72.96*
132382
12/21/92
$350.50
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART WORK SOLD
121092
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$350.50*
132383
12/21/92
$51.15
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
121592
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
12/21/92
$46.39
JOHNSON, NAOMI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121592
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$39.53
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ADVERT /AC
121592
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$137.07*
132384
12/21/92
$32.79
JOHNSON,STEVE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
121192
SUPERV. & OVRH
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$32.79*
132385
12/21/92
$131.76
K &V LIGHTING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6499
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
5035
12/21/92
19
K &V LIGHTING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6539
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
5091
< *>
.26
$151
132386
12/21/92
$110.90
KAMAN INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
A724497
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
4887
< *>
-
$110.90*
132387
12/21/92
$204.88
KATTREH, ANN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121492
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
< *>
$204.88*
132388
12/21/92
$56.25
KLOCKIT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
902318
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
4665
< *>
$56.25*
132389
12/21/92
$145.29
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
031505
CLUB HOUSE
LUMBER
3868
12/21/92
$38.28
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
037612
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$57.00
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
037655
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4700
12/21/92
$16.62
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
037792
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
4070
12/21/92
$33.82
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
038259
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
4176
12/21/92
$39.28
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
039065
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
4881
12/21/92
$81.66
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
039059
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
4821
12/21/92
$26.59
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
039845
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
4956
12/21/92
$95.64
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
040182
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
5017
12/21/92
$44.71
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
040445
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
5044
12/21/92
- $38.32
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
031505CR
CLUB HOUSE
PAINT
< *>
$540.57*
132390
12/21/92
$28.00
KOCHENASH, RICK
AC INSTRUCTOR
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$28.00*
132391
12/21/92
$199.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
68270
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
5093
12/21/92
$149.25
KOKESH ATHLETIC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
68214
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GO F00
5094
12/21/92
$447.75
KOKESH ATHLETIC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
FO
68737
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOO
5031
< *>
$796.00*
132392
12/21/92
$2,350.70
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$3,791.45
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$6,142.15*
132393
12/21/92
$191.50
KUNDE CO INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
121092
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$191.50*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132394
12/21/92
$25.00
KVAWSNICK, BARBARA
ART- PROGRAM AT EDINBO
121492
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
132395
12/21/92
$50.00
LAHET, TERA
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120892
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$50.00*
132396
12/21/92
$103.28
LANDSCAPE PROD CTR
LUMBER
502699
MAINT OF COURS
LUMBER
2990
< *>
$103.28*
132397
12/21/92
$304.45
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1859406
BUILDING MAINT,
GENERAL SUPPL
4511
12/21/92
$361.56
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1859405
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
4910
12/21/92
$236.99
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1859404
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
4509
12/21/92
$38,6.21
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1859403
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
4509
12/21/92
$194.27
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
1860146
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
4708
12/21/92
$317.38
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1860145
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
4708
<*>
$1,800.86*
132398
12/21/92
$53.25
LEAANNS SEW /DECO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
92095
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$53.25*
132399
12/21/92
$31.47
LEE, MARGE
ART WORK SOLD
121092
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$31.47*
132400
12/21/92
$24.29
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
102504 1
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
12/21/92
$29.99
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
994271
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
< *>
$54.28*
132401
12/21/92
$117.43
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
120192
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$117.43*
132402
12/21/92
$785.00
LINDENSELSER LANDFL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
112792
GC CIP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$785.00*
132403
12/21/92
$3,040.88
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSI
---
12/21/92
$2,632.11
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSI
12/21/92
$2,570.06
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSI
12/21/92
$574.72
LOGIS
DUE FROM HRA
119208 1
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
12/21/92
$316.96
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSI
12/21/92
$316.96
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSI
12/21/92
$316.96
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
119208 1
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$9,768.65*
132404
12/21/92
$4,546.33
LOGIS
HOMESTEAD CARDS
121092
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$4,546.33*
132405
12/21/92
$200.00
LUND, THOMAS F
BUILDING PERMITS
120392
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$200.00*
132406
12/21/92
$334.53
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16753
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$195.02
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16809
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$378.40
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16827
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$214.77
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16888
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$313.52
M AMUNDSON
-COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16949
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$469.35
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
16967
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,905.59*
ft
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 13
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132407
12/21/92
$20.00
M.P.S.A
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
120892
PARK MAINTENAN
DUES & SUBSCR
5053
12/21/92
$20.00
M.P.S.A
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
120892
BUILDING MAINT
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$40.00*
132408
12/21/92
$250.00
MADSON,JOHN
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$250.00*
132409
12/21/92
$11.70
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
113092/G
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$288.40
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$11,356.57
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$11,388.80
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$150.60
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$5,258.30
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$148.90
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$28,603.27*
132410
12/21/92
$256.50
MCC /MIDWEST
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
74605
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
4664
12/21/92
$24.00
MCC /MIDWEST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
74605
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
< *>
$280.50*
132411
12/21/92
$423.02
MCCAREN DESIGN
FERTILIZER
8178
BUILDING & GRO
FERTILIZER
4967
< *>
$423.02*
132412
12/21/92
$66:00
MCGARVEY COFFEE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5122524
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
5185
< *>
$66.00*
13
12/21/92
$203.13*
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
120192 /G
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
*413
132414
12/21/92
$277.18
MEDICAL DISPOSAL SYS
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
23131192
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
4552
< *>
$277.18*
132415
12/21/92
$467.53
MERIT SUPPLY
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
31653
SNOW & ICE REM
CALCIUM CHLOR
4790
12/21/92
$413.22
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31661
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
4838
12/21/92
$453.47
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
31683
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
4851
12/21/92
$198.00
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
31707
VERNON OCCUPAN
REPAIR PARTS
4884
12/21/92
$218.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
31732
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
4903
12/21/92
$475.36
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31764
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$498.31
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31816
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5088
12/21/92
$425.04
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
31824
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPP
5096
< *>
$3,148.93*
132416
12/21/92
$180.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE FEES
17257 58
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
12/21/92
$30.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE FEES
16956 17
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
12/21/92
$20.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE FEES
17528
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$230.00*
132417
12/21/92
$25.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
343618
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
12/21/92
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
344469
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
5095
< *>
$60.00*
132418
12/21/92
$22,176.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BUILDING PERMITS
NOV
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$22,176.00*
132419
12/21/92
$20.63
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
120592
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
---------------------7--------------------------------------------7-----------------------------------------------------------------
132419
12/21/92
- $17.87
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
OVERPAYM
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$2.76*
132420
12/21/92
$49.00
METZGER AQUATIC ENGI
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
8002
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$49.00*
132421
12/21/92
$32.50
METZGER, BETH
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
121592
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$32.50*
132422
12/21/92
$185.00
MGA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120292
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
4793
< *>
$185.00*
132423
12/21/92
$3,787.35
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
2341
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
12/21/92
$57.08
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2341
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$334.19
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8855
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$89.85
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8895
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
12/21/92
$502.46
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
8895
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
12/21/92
$1,531.22
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2419
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$6,302.15*
132424
12/21/92
$28.06
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
13848
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$12.47
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
13849
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$40.53*
132425
12/21/92
$122.48
MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
81435
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPL
4823
< *>
$122.48*
132426
12/21/92
$181.48
MILTONA TURF PRODUCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
005621
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
5086
< *>
$181.48*
132427
12/21/92
$35.88
MINNEAPOLIS SPRING &
ACCESSORIES
74204
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4684
12/21/92
$3.77
MINNEAPOLIS SPRING &
REPAIR PARTS
76009
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$39.65*
-- 132428
12/21/92
$15.00
MINNESOTA CONSERVATI
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
14754
PARK MAINTENAN
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$15.00*
132429
12/21/92
$37.32
MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
024721
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
4021
< *>
$37.32*
132430
12/21/92
$875.00
MINNESOTA ELECTRO CO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1485
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
5111
< *>
$875.00*
132431
12/21/92
$100.00
MINNESOTA POLLUTION
LICENSES & PERMITS
111092
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$100.00*
132432
12/21/92
$10.00
MINNESOTA PREVENTION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
10540
COMMUNICATIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$10.00*
132433
12/21/92
$20.00
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SA
LICENSES & PERMITS
120192
LIQUOR 50TH ST
LIC & PERMITS
12/21/92
$20.00
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SA
LICENSES & PERMITS
120192
VERNON LIQUOR
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$40.00*
132434
12/21/92
$18,111.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
DUE TO OTHER GOVERMEN
120792
UTILITY PROG
DUE TO 0TH GO
< *>
$18,111.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 15
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132435
12/21/92
$1,082.60
MN DEPT OF
GASOLINE
NOV
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$1,082.60*
132436
12/21/92
$85.00
MN STATE BOARD OF EL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10289
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$85.00*
132437
12/21/92
$2,063.00
MN STATE TREA /BLG IN
BUILDING PERMITS
NOVEMBER
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$2,063.00*
132438
12/21/92
$1,946.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PRINTING
112592
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
12/21/92
$30.15
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
7489
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$1,976.15*
132439
12/21/92
$716.13
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$239.55
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$418.13
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,373.81*
132440
12/21/92
$79.88
MN. CONWAY
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
23645
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
12/21/92
$519.19
MN. CONWAY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23057
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
4549
< *>
$599.07*
132441
12/21/92
$58.51
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
307682
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
4850
12/21/92
$1,619.52
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
308355
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
4809
12/21/92
$4,000.00
MN. TORO INC.
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
308538
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$5,678.03*
132442
12/21/92
$411.90
MN. WANNER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
16808
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
5046
< *>
$411.90*
132443
12/21/92
$232.03
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
160057
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
12/21/92
$296.04
MODEL STONE
CONCRETE
160058
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
12/21/92
$248.53
MODEL STONE.
CONCRETE
160056
SIDEWALKS & PA
CONCRETE
12/21/92
$296.67
MODEL STONE
FILL MATERIALS
160811
GENERAL STORM
FILL MATERIAL
< *>
$1,073.27*
132444
12/21/92
$784.50
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030427
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
4891
12/21/92
$945.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030434
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
4919
< *>
$1,729.50*
132445
12/21/92
$120.00
MR H/ SOCCER WORLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31931
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPL
4979
< *>
$120.00*
132446
12/21/92
$514.45
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
4104.
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4588
12/21/92
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO
REPAIR PARTS
4110.
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4605
12/21/92
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
4140.
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4754
< *>
$621.45*
132447
12/21/92
$43.00
N.A.D.A.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
111892
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$43.00*
132448
12/21/92
$85.00
NATIONAL ASSOC OF GO
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
111692
COMMUNICATIONS
DUES & SUBSCR
132449
12/21/92
$185.37
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
559540
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 16
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132449
12/21/92
$196.79
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
559539
VERNON OCCUPAN
ALARM SERVICE
12/21/92
$494.99
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
559444
CLUB HOUSE
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$877.15*
132450
12/21/92
$18.15
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
128575
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GO F00
9628
12/21/92
- $148.20
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
706484
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
12/21/92
$365.51
NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
130232
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GO F00
9628
<*>
$235.46*
-
132451
12/21/92
$105.60
NICKLOW, LIA
PT MAINT
ART CENTER
121592
ART CENTER BLD
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
$105.60*
132452
12/21/92
$84.35
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
511980
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
4961
<*>
$84.35*
132453
12/21/92
$54.46
NORTHERN AIRGAS
FIRST AID
SUPPLIES
810760
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
8899
< *>
$54.46*
132454
12/21/92
$292.82
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40242309
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPL
4776
< *>
$292.82*
132455
12/21/92
$288.00
NORTHERN POWER PROD.
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
264046
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
5043
< *>
$288.00*
132456
12/21/92
$222.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$126.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$72.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$420.00*
132457
12/21/92
$485.30
NOVAK'S GARAGE
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
00098
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
4867
< *>
$485.30*
132458
12/21/92
$365.02
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
1125
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT & POWER
12/21/92
$37.83
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
1202
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
---
12/21/92
$22.95
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
DEC 2
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
12/21/92
$4.,521.00
NSP
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
120892
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$4,946.80*
132459
12/21/92
$236.74
OFFICE PRODUCTS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
181290
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
4721
< *>
$236.74*
132460
12/21/92
$28.29
OLD DUTCH FOODS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
112792
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
9038
< *>
$28.29*
132461
12/21/92
$269.44*
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
130820
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
132462
12/21/92
$31.00
OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTE
REPAIR
PARTS
10449
SKATING RINK M
REPAIR PARTS
5130
<*>
$31.00*
132463
12/21/92
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
0916
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
12/21/92
$81.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
0917
GRILL
CST OF GO F00
9041
12/21/92
5211.00*
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
1060
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
< *>
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 17
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132464
12/21/92
$104.62
OWENS SERVICE CO
REPAIR PARTS
69746
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
4765
< *>
$104.62*
132465
12/21/92
$125.00
PADGETT- THOMPSON
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
121092
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$125.00*
132466
12/21/92
$1,050.00
PALEN /KIMBALL COMPAN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
84122P
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
4408
< *>
$1,050.00*
132467
12/21/92
$208.95
PARAGON CABLE MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SW 92 -11
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
<*>
$208.95*
132468
12/21/92
$804.42
PAT GREER
VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$804.42*
132469
12/21/92
$36.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
27921
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
.$36.00*
132470
12/21/92
$114.85
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
'NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$239.95
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$398.25
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$78.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
113092/0
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$831.05*
132471
12/21/92
$152.87
PETERSON, BARBARA
MEETING EXPENSE
120792
COMMUNICATIONS
MEETING EXPEN
12/21/92
$74.75
PETERSON, BARBARA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121592
ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE
< *>
$227.62*
132472
12/21/92
$5,347.75
PILLSBURY MADISON &
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
112392
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$5,347.75*
132473
12/21/92
$380.00
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1481
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$135.00
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1495
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$90.00
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1503
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
5221
< *>
$605.00*
132474
12/21/92
$189.46
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
11890
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
5102
12/21/92
$122.69
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
11957
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
5114
< *>
$312.15*
132475
12/21/92
$80.00
PIPER PLUMBING
PLUMBING PERMITS
120892
GENERAL FD PRO
PLUMBING PERM
< *>
$80.00*
132476
12/21/92
$29.90
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
490771
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.90*
132477
12/21/92
$170.06
PLYWOOD MINNESOTA
REPAIR PARTS
140513
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
4799,
< *>
$170.06*
132478
12/21/92
$142.50
POISSON DESIGN GROUP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$142.50*
132479
12/21/92
$32.40
PORTER CABLE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6902945
BUILDINGS
CONTR REPAIRS
4773
< *>
$32.40*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED,,DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 18
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132480
12/21/92
$5,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
120892
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$5,000.00*
132481
12/21/92
$2,257.80
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
113092
SEWER TREATMEN
SAFETY EQUIPM
4693
< *>
$2,257.80*
132482
12/21/92
$81.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
79648
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$81.00*
132483
12/21/92
$4,145.42
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
111092
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & R
< *>
$4,145.42*
132484
12/21/92
$50.49
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
636007
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$101.47
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
636009
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$27.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
636124
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
12/21/92
$42.07
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
638784
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$178.20
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
638786
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$399.63*
132485
12/21/92
$2,334.64
PROGRESSIVE CONTRACT
FINAL PAYMENT
92 -5
BRIDGES
CIP
< *>
$2,334.64*
132486
12/21/92
$25.00
PROMOVIDEO TELEVISIO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120392
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$25.00*
132487
12/21/92
$290.47
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
045163
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
12/21/92
$50.44
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
046456
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$340.91*
132488
12/21/92
$117.11
QUICK SERV BATTERY
ACCESSORIES
32016
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4757
12/21/92
$28.12
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
32050
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4757
12/21/92
$147.35
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
33421
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4889
12/21/92
$35.78
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
33434
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
4889
< *>
$328.36*
132489
12/21/92
$75.36
QUIK PRINT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
046129
GOLF DOME
OFFICE SUPPLI
4981
< *>
-
$75.36*
132490
12/21/92
$34.45
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
017262
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
5030
< *>
$34.45*
132491
12/21/92
$48.00
REARDON, PAUL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1.21092
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
5186
< *>
$48.00*
132492
12/21/92
$103.70
RED WING SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
287562
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$324.70
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
287561
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
12/21/92
$328.95
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
287561
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
< *>
$757.35*
132493
12/21/92
$372.86
REM SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
01899
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
4913
12/21/92
$499.70
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01901
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
5081
12/21/92
$133.87
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01915
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5099
12/21/92
$380.84
REM SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
01900
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
4914
12/21/92
$314.43
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01903
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5029
12/21/92
$483.40
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01907
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
5182
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 19
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<•>
$2,185.10"
132494
12/21/92
$69.90
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$4,629.70
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$8,608.75
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$118.20
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$7,302.46
REX DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
<�>
$20,729.01"
132495
12/21/92
$350.50
RIFFEY, JANE
ART WORK SOLD
1210
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< ■>
$350.50"
132496
12/21/92
$106.83
RITEWAY
ACCESSORIES
141321 -M
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4888
< ■>
$106.83"
132497
12/21/92
$26.23
RITZ CAMERA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50 5501
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
5034
12/21/92
$8.51
RITZ CAMERA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50 5481
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
4994
12/21/92
$37.65
RITZ CAMERA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50 5489
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
5157
< ■>
$72.39"
132498
12/21/92
$400.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
51146
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
5156
<R>
$400.00"
132499
12/21/92
$4,749.00
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
5199
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
5123
< *>
$4,749.00"
132500
12/21/92
$270.00
ROXANNE SEIDEL
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
120992
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$270.00•
132501
12/21/92
$3,362.60
RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
4
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$3,362.60'
132502
12/21/92
$138.72
SAFETY KLEEN
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
900256
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
5007
<R>
$138.72"
132503
12/21/92
$162.14
SAXTON PRINTING & GR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
11 -144
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$162.14"
132504
12/21/92
$135.00
SCHMITT MUSIC
MUSIC SUPPLIES
113092
SPECIAL ACTIVI
MUSIC SUPPLIE
5201
< ■>
$135.00"
132505
12/21/92
$42.60
SCHWANEBECK, CLAIRE
ADVERTISING /ART CENTE
121592
ART CENTER ADM
FUEL OIL
<•>
$42.60"
132506
12/21/92
$231.15
SERVICE SALES CORP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
58582
LIQUOR 50TH ST
OFFICE SUPPLI
4944
12/21/92
$231.16
SERVICE SALES CORP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
58582
LIQUOR YORK GE
OFFICE SUPPLI
4944
12/21/92
$231.16
SERVICE SALES CORP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
58582
VERNON LIQUOR
OFFICE SUPPLI
4944
<�>
$693.47"
132507
12/21/92
$2,409.50
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO 0
REPAIR PARTS
7721
SEWER CLEANING
REPAIR PARTS
4792
< ">
$2,409.50"
132508
12/21/92
$22.84
SHIRLEY, TOM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
120892
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOL
12/21/92
$201.95
SHIRLEY, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120892
BUILDING & GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$224.79"
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 20
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
---------------------------------------=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
132509
12/21/92
$145.00
SILVER LAKE JACK CO
ACCESSORIES
8558
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5000
< *>
$145.00*
132510
12/21/92
$50.00
SIPES, GARY
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH
110192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
132511
12/21/92
$150.00
SMITH, CORY
SERVICES /GOLF COURSE
121192
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$150.00*
132512
12/21/92
$37.28
SOKKIA MEASURING SYS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
104677
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
2997
< *>
$37.28*
132513
12/21/92
$11,748.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
12/21/92
$200.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$130.80
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$3,577.65
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV 50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
515,656.45*
132514
12/21/92
$104.07
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
1962841
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
4704
< *>
$104.07 *.
132515
12/21/92
$5.76
ST. PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
166731
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLI
<*>
$5.76*
132516
12/21/92
$452.25
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
113092
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
< *>
$452.25*
132517
12/21/92
$17.20
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
69 -3100-
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$17.20*
132518
12/21/92
$1,357.46
STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
(*>
$1,357.46*
132519
12/21/92
$44.53
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
176944
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
--
12/21/92
$18.73
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
177054
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$15.13
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
177098
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$19.29
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
ACCESSORIES
177134.
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
12/21/92
$18.37
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
ACCESSORIES
177226 )
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
< *>
$116.05*
132520
12/21/92
$20.00
SUPERIOR CONTRACTORS
PLUMBING PERMITS
120192
GENERAL FD PRO
PLUMBING PERM
< *>
$20.00*
132521
12/21/92
$48.84
SUPERIOR FORD
ACCESSORIES
166323
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4900
12/21/92
$28.67
SUPERIOR FORD
ACCESSORIES
166646
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4989
< *>
$77.51*
132522
12/21/92
$57.64
SURE PLUS MANUFACTUR
ACCESSORIES
313072 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4753
< *>
$57.64*
132523
12/21/92
$210.00
SUSAN FRAME
PT OFFICE ART CENTER
121592
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERTISING L
12/21/92
$550.50
SUSAN FRAME
ART WORK SOLD
121592
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
< *>
$760.50*
132524
12/21/92
$75.00
SYMPHOKNOLLS
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH
110192
ADMINISTRATION
PRO SVC OTHER
f
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 21
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$75.00*
132525
12/21/92
$50.10
SYSCO MN
CLEANING SUPPLIES
120192
GRILL
CLEANING SUPP
1285
12/21/92
$92.44
SYSCO MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120192
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$510.19
SYSCO MN
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
120192
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$652.73*
132526
12/21/92
$91.05
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110203
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
4937
12/21/92
$17.83
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110203
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$122.02
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110236
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
4937
< *>
$230.90*
132527
12/21/92
TAMARACK MATERIAL
CASTINGS
266417
CENTENNIAL LAK
CASTINGS
4869
*
$135.66 *
132528
12/21/92
$43.21
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00397551
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$167.57
TARGET
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
00397551
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIE
*
< >
*
132529
12/21/92
$117.53
TEAM MARKETING COMPA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25158
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
5101
< *>
$117.53*
132530
12/21/92
$105.21
TERRY ANN SALES CO
CLEANING SUPPLIES
1277
GOLF DOME
CLEANING SUPP
4980
< *>
$105.21*
132531
12/21/92
$334.21
THE BOOKMEN INC
RETAIL SALES
117182
ART CNTR PROG
RETAIL SALES
4673
<*>
$334.21*
132532
12/21/92
$55.50
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4398019
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$55.50*
132533
12/21/92
$479.25
THE PRINT SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
20160
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
4370
< *>
$479.25*
132534
12/21/92
$41.25
THE WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
4868
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$41.25*
132535
12/21/92
$1,750.00
THOMPSON HINE AND FL
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
120192
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$1,750.00*
132536
12/21/92
$64.00
THOMPSON, DORIS
REGISTRATION FEES
120292
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$64.00*
132537
12/21/92
$10,315.68
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
67152
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$10,315.68*
132538
12/21/92
$177.60
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
12/21/92
$9,616.40
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
NOV VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$9,794.00*
132539
12/21/92
$29.61
TIME LIFE MUSIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120492
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.61*
132540
12/21/92
$14.27*
TOLL COMPANY
TOOLS
201946
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
4963
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC
16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 22
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------
132541
12/21/92
$1,225.00
TONKA SEAMLESS GUTTE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1209
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
<•>
$1,225.00"
132542
12/21/92
$260.00
TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
9400
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
5192
< ■>
$260.00*
132543
12/21/92
$35.43
TWIN CITY SAW SERVIC
ACCESSORIES
4805
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4782
< ■>
$35.43"
132544
12/21/92
$188.00
UHL CO
REPAIR PARTS
64885
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
4829
<�>
$188.00"
132545
12/21/92
$556.67
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
385013
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
12/21/92
$132.25
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
113092
RESERVE PROGRA
UNIF ALLOW
12/21/92
$67.57
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
113092
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
12/21/92
$1,991.25
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
113092
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
<�>
$2,747.74"
132546
12/21/92
$105.57
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 210
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
4826
12/21/92
$86.11
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 210
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3834
12/21/92
$292.79
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 210
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
4832
12/21/92
$84.74
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
67SI 210
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
4841
12/21/92
- $118.00
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SR 933
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$639.57
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 211
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
4954
.
< >
..
132547
12/21/92
$32.89
UNIVERSITY OF MINNES
OVERPAY FINAL 5229 HO
120492
UTILITY PROG
MISCELLANOUS
<•>
$32.89"
132548
12/21/92
$150.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
120392
COMMUNICATIONS
DUES & SUBSCR
< ■>
$150.00"
132549
12/21/92
$56.02
US WEST CELLULAR
ACCT $ 1003- 694860
OCTOBER
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$26.94
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
110192.
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
---
12/21/92
$113.24
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
111092
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$52.34
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
120192
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$110.99
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
1201
BUILDING & GRO
TELEPHONE
<•>
$359.53"
132551
12/21/92
$54.87
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
DARE
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$118.49
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$4,076.38
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$175.38
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$59.66
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$46.18
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$494.66
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$60.54
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$54.69
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$230.55
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$75.09
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
GUN RANGE
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$94.17
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$660.10
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$16.06
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$17.18
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
12/21/92
$141.04
US WEST COMM.
TELEPHONE
122192
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM
page 23
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$6,375.04"
132552
12/21/92
$100.00
USGA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
R627 -876
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$100.00"
132553
12/21/92
$496.11
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
012335
BUILDING & GRO
PROF SERVICES
5100
12/21/92
$211.73
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
012341
GOLF PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
3599
12/21/92
$185.72
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
012337.
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
5199
<�>
$893.56"
132554
12/21/92
VIKING IDENTIFIATION
PRINTING
165532
ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
$151.53 *
132555
12/21/92
$143.30
VIKING LAB INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
63977
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
4878
< *>
$143.30'
132556
12/21/92
$2,397.10
VOTER REG /ELEC SECT
PRINTING
1192
ELECTION
PRINTING
< *>
$2,397.10*
132557
12/21/92
$273.89
W W GRAINGER
TOOLS
495 -2100
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
4767
12/21/92
$32.16
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
495 -2105
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
4759
12/21/92
$238.49
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
498 -6780
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
4759
< *>
$544.54*
132558
12/21/92
$245.00
WASSMUND, TOM
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
01010
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$245.00*
132559
12/21/92
$85.00
WATCZAK, JEFFREY J
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
111092
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
*
*
132560
12/21/92
$82.966*
WATER PRO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
413054
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
4911
132561
12/21/92
$902.50
WENDY ANDERSON ENTER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
112492
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$902.50*
132562
12/21/92
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
311596
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
4390
< *>
$90.00*
132563
12/21/92
$39.94
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
88363
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
< ■>
$39.94*
132564
12/21/92
$259.89
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1857
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
4882
12/21/92
$322.28
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
ACCESSORIES
1833
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
4771
12/21/92
$12.73
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELDING SUPPLIES
2084
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPL
5011
< *>
$594.90*
132565
12/21/92
$5.42
WILLIAMS STEEL
REPAIR PARTS
451183 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/21/92
$409.13
WILLIAMS STEEL
REPAIR PARTS
453588 -0
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
4818
< *>
$414.55*
132566
12/21/92
$32.01
WORLD CLASS WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
13859
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
< *>
$32.01*
132567
12/21/92
$554.11
XEROX CORP
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
03563053
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP RENTAL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, DEC 16, 1992, 8:58 PM page 24
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *> $554.11*
132568 12/21/92 $135.08 ZANY PRODUCTIONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES EDIN BUILDING & GRO GENERAL SUPPL
<*> $135.08*
132569 12/21/92 $45.00 ZINN, BOBO AC INSTRUCTOR 121592 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
< *> $45.00*
$2,319,989.44*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, DEC 16, 1992, 9:31 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
FUND # 10
FUND # 11
FUND # 12
FUND # 15
FUND # 23
FUND # 26
FUND # 27
FUND # 28
FUND # 29
FUND # 30
FUND # 40
FUND # 41
FUND # 50
FUND # 60
FUND # 66
$773,522.74
$4,101.00
$1,254.35
$4,550.65
$7,182.13
$54.69
$840,918.37
$98,082.78
$296.82
$17,221.21
$39,712.93
$1,026.34
$118,108.65
$87,931.78
$326,025.00
$2,319,989.44•
i
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
page 1
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129657
11/06/92
$170,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
1106
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
11/06/92
- $170,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
1106
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
<">
$0.00"
129658
11/09/92
$19,564.13
FIDELITY BANK
FICA /MEDICARE
110992
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL
PAYAB
< ">
$19,564.13"
129661
12/09/92
51,035.65
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625672
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $10.36
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625672
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$602.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625675
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$6.03
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625675
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$915.65
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625673
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$9.16
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625673
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$102.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625988
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.03
EAGLE WINE
LI19921113
625988
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< ">
$2,630.29"
129662
12/09/92
$369.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50856
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.38
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50856
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$828.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50826
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,128.05
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51029
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$796.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50854
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$41.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51073
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD-WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$913.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51028
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $18.27
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51028
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,386.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51027
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92-
$207.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51110
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$90.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51025
YORK'SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$617.10
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50853_
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$910.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51026
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $18.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51026
YORK SELLING .
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$820.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
48462
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$187.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
49961
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$464.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51104
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
---
12/09/92
$838.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50847
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$225.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50968
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
50968
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$205.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51065
50TH ST.SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,362.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921113
51133
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
< ">
$11,341.10"
129663
12/09/92
$1,040.24
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921113
627157
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $20.54
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921113
627157
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< ■>
$1,019.70"
129664
12/09/92
$848.22
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932890
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$18.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932890
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$8.49
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932890
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$829.82
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932882
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$4.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932882
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $16.59
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932882
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$334.64
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932874
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$8.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932874
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.38
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7932874
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,270.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921113
7923758
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
page 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129664 12/09/92 $16.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19921113 7923758 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI1209
T I1209
12/09/92 - $12.73
12/09/92 $1,139.33
12/09/92 $9.00
12/09/92 - $22.78
12/09/92 $1,747.99
12/09/92 $9.00
12/09/92 -$34.97
12/09/92 $147.08
12/09/92 $1.00
12/09/92 -$1.47
12/09/92 $50.15
12/09/92 $0.50
12/09/92 -$0.50
12/09/92 $27.83
12/09/92 $0.50
12/09/92 -$0.28
12/09/92 $1,300.40
12/09/92 $26.50
12/09/92 - $12.98
12/09/92 $3,702.20
12/09/92 $16.50
12/09/92 -$74.06
12/09/92 $1,645.96
12/09/92 $9.00
12/09/92 -$32.96
12/09/92 $146.38
12/09/92 $1.50
12/09/92 -$1.46
12/09/92 $698.88
12/09/92 $7.50
12/09/92 -$7.00
12/09/92 $220.16
12/09/92 $1.00
12/09/92 -$2.20
12/09/92 $55.66
12/09/92 $1.00
12/09/92 -$0.56
12/09/92 $818.40
12/09/92 $8.50
12/09/92 -$8.19
12/09/92 $2,264.31
12/09/92 $9.50
12/09/92 - $45.28
12/09/92 $2,583.80
12/09/92 $16.00
12/09/92 - $51.68
12/09/92 - $5..32
12/09/92 $27.83
12/09/92 $0.50
12/09/92 -$0.28
12/09/92 $111.08
12/09/92 $0.50
12/09/92 -$1.11
12/09/92 $524.14
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
L119921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
LI19921113
7923758
7923774
7923774
7923774
7923782
7923782
7923782
7923790
7923790
7923790
7923766
7923766
7923766
7923808
7923808
7923808
7932866
7932866
7932866
7923659
7923659
.7923659
7923642
7923642
7923642
7923626
7923626
7923626
7923618
7923618
7923618
7923675
7923675
7923675
7923683
7923683
7923683
7923691
7923691
7923691
7923725
7923725
7923725
7923717
7923717
7923717
7900434
7923741
7923741
7923741
7923733
7923733
7923733
7923709
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUN
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
L
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
L11209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
L11209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
page 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7--------------------------------
129664
12/09/92
$3.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921113
7923709
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$5.24
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921113
7923709
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$20,313.25*
129665
12/09/92
$345.80
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27016
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.60
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27016
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$59.90
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27133
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27133
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.90
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27133
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$299.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27269
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$6.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27269
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$233.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27272
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.60
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921113
27272
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$953.50*
129666
12/09/92
$983.13
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625329
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$9.83
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625329
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$836.41
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625331
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$8.36
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625331
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,011.17
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625333
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $10.11
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921113
625333
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$2,802.41*
129667
12/09/92
$331.25
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
037651
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.31
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
037651
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$331.25
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
037653
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.31
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
037653
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$66.25
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
'037734
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09./92
-$0.66
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
'037734
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$4,013.42
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038569
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $80.27
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038569
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$3,836.91
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038583
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $76.74
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038583
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,714.34
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038722
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $27.14
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038722
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,799.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038779
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $27.99
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
038779
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$98.45,
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
039073
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1:97
QUALITY WINE
LI19921113
039073
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$13,969.91*
129668
12/09/92
$188.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19921113
12573
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$2.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19921113
12573
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$68.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
LI19921113
13777
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$258.00*
129669
12/09/92
$888.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628248
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$8.89
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628248
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,069.99
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628250
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $10.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628250
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,728.92
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628252
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $17.29
EAGLE WINE
LI19921118
628252
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$3,650.67*
129670
12/09/92
$630.70
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19921118
52994
.50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER MON, DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129670
12/09/92
$692.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53115
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,596.45
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
52993
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$937.56
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
52983
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $18.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
52983
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$54.49
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
52996
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.09
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
-52996
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,635.85
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53036
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209-
12/09/92
$67.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
51589
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$28.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53009
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$37.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53250
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$718.99
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53035
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $14.38
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118.
53035
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$391.48
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53038
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.83
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53038
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$500.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
52456
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$569.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53037
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$158.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53042
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.16
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53042
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L11209
12/09/92
$67.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
51590
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$922'.43
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53039
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$18.45
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53039
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$813.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53041
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,146.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53040
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,195.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921118
53195
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
<�>
412,101.79*
129671
12/09/92
$2,273.71
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
628522
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $45.47
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
628522
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$5,163.72
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
625955
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $103.27
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
625955
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$5,151.11
GRIGGS COOPER.
& CO.
LI19921118.
628523
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $103.02
GRIGGS COOPER
;a CO.
LI19921118
628523
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$3,238.22
GRIGGS COOPER.
CO.
LI19921118
628521
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$64.76
GRIGGS COOPER
8:
LI19921118
628521
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$10,580.12
GRIGGS COOPER
& CU.
LI19921118
625956
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $211.60
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
625956
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$6,832.95
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
625954
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $136.66
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
625954
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$173.52
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
629214
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.47
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
629214
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$391.89
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
629753
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.84
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
629753
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
- $44.37
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70775
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.95
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70563
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$0.08
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70563
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
- $146.15
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70778
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $321.37
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70776
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $198.80
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921118
70777
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
<•>
$32,410.59*
129672
12/09/92
$282.43
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953714
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$2.50
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953714
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.82
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953714
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$119.22
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953680
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$1.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953680
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
MON,
DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 5
CHECK# DATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
129672 12/09/92
-82.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953680
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,073.44
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953698
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953698
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- 521.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118.
7953698
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$27.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953722
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$0.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953722
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953722
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$348.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953730
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$7.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953730
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.51
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953730
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$283.27
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953706
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953706
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953706
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$707.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954571
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$6.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954571
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-87.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954571
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$200.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954563
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954563
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954563
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$278.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954589
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954589
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954589
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$868.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954597
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$19.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954597
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$8.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954597
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,700.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954548
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$9.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954548
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $34.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954548
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$3,093.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954555
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$17.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954555
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $61.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7954555
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$3,417.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953623
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$18.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953623
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $68.36
JOHNSON
WIJ�IE
CO.
LI19921118
7953623
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
--- 12/09/92
$456.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953631
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$6.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953631
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953631
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$636.91
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953649
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953649
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $6.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7,953649
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$83.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953656
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953656
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953656
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$607.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953664
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953664
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$6.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953664
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,147.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953615
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$7.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953615
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $22.94
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7953615
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$195.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7942436
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.91
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7942436
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$73.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7961899
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7961899
50TH ST SELLIN
CST.OF
GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921118
7961899
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$15.473.36*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON. DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
page 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129673
12/09/92
$215.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921119
27468
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$6.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921119
27468
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$92.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921119
27468
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119921119
27468
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$339.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921119
27471
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$8.80
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921119
27471
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$664.30*
129674
12/09/92
$49.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627736
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627736
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,228.38
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627812
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
- $12.28
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119921119
627812
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,368.56
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627815
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $13.69
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627815
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$453.21
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627814
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.81
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
627814
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$3,068.62*
129675
12/09/92
$1,628.15
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
038874
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $16.28
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
038874
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,107.33
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040511
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
-
12/09/92
- $22.15
QUALITY
WINE
L119921118
040511
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT'LI1209
12/09/92
$3,508.57
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040577
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $70.17
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040577
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,294.36
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040585
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$45.89
'QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040585
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,306.75
QUALITY
WINE
L119921118
040792
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209.
12/09/92
- $23.07
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040792
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,951.36
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040810
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $29.51
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040810
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,647.66
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040815
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $16.48
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
040815
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$42.95
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041340
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041340
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$47.40
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041088
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.47
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041088
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$47.03
QUALITY
WINE
L119921118
041427
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.47
QUALITY:WINE
LI19921118
041427
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$348.98
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041202
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$6.98
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041202
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$240.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041430
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LIL209
12/09/92
-$2.40
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921118
041430
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$15,936.24*
129676
12/09/92
$63.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19921119
8305
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
$2.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19921119
8305
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$65.00*
129677
12/09/92
$194.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
4078
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.75
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19921119
4078
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$197.75*
129678
11/17/92
$1,377.19
FIDELITY BANK
FICA /MEDICARE
111792
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< *>
$1,377.19*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
page 7
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
-------------------------------------- .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129679 11/20/92 - $196,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 112092 LIQUOR PROG CASH
11/20/92 $196,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 112092 LIQUOR PROG CASH
< *> $0.00*
129680 11/23/92 $950.34 COMM LIFE INS CO. LIFE INSURANCE 112392 CENT SVC GENER LIFE INSURANC
< *> $950.34*
129681 11/23/92 $18,664.40 FIDELITY BANK FICA /MEDICARE 112392 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYAB
< *> $18,664.40*
129682
12/09/92
$748.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630893
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
-37.48
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630893
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$1,390.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630894
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
- $13.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630894
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$527.15
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630897
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
-$5.27
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630897'
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
$779.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630898
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
-$7.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19921124
630898
YORK SELLING
< *>
$3,410.29*
129683
12/09/92
$1,088.05
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55730
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$1,129.25
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55653
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$205.00
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55453
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$966.26
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55910
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
- $19.33
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55910
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$2,151.85
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55952
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$263.52
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
56514
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
-$5.27
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
56514
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$119.10
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
56515
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
-$2.38
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
56515
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$42.15
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
567507
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$1,526.50
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55726
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$408.07
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55728
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
-$8.16
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55728
YORK SELLING
---
12/09/92
$823.15
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55648
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$2,622.95
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55951
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$2,492.20
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55908
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
- $49.84
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55908
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$245.90
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55802
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$41.00
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55801
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$466.15
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55638
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
$1,088.30
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55795
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
$910.20
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19921124
55903
50TH ST SELLIN
< *>
$16,504.62*
129684
12/09/92
$5,731.18
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631176
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
- $114.62
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631176
VERNON SELLING
12/09/92
$1,777.18
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631177
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
- $35.54
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631177
50TH ST SELLIN
12/09/92
$7,679.41
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631178
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
- $153.59
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631178
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$2,945.05
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631179
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
- $58.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631179
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
$224.76
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631960
YORK SELLING
12/09/92
-$2.25
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
631960
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN LI1209
CASH DISCOUNT LI1209
CST OF GD WIN LI1209
CASH DISCOUNT LI1209
CST OF GD WIN LI1209
CASH DISCOUNT LI1209
CST OF GD WIN LI1209
CASH DISCOUNT LI1209
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
MON,
DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129684
12/09/92
- $33.12
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
70945
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$90.34
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
70956
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $138.92
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
70957
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $28.32
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
70958
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $15.99
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
71237
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$0.16
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
71237
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
- $21.28
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19921124
71302
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
< *>
$17,664.87*
129685
12/09/92
$1,218.87.
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983018
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$25.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983018
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $12.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983018
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
1470442
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
$4,069.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982994
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$20.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
•LI19921124
7982994
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $81.42
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982994
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,811.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982986
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L11209
12/09/92
$11.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982986
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $36.23
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982986
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,671.85
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982952
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$18.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119921124
7982952
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $16.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119921124
7982952
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$368.42
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982960
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
$4.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119921124
7982960
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7982960
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209 .
12/09/92
$1,480.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983984
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983984
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $29.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983984
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$471.42
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984008
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$3.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984008
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.71
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984008
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L11209
12/09/92
$2,234.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983950
YORK SELLING
CST.OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$26.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983950
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $22.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983950
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$789.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO..
LI19921124
7983968
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$8.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983968
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983968
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$7,420.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983992
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$41.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983992
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $148.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983992
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,774.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984024
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$42.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984024
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $17.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7984024
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
1470434
YORK.SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI1209
12/09/92
$618.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7993645
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$12.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7993645
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/9.2
$1,350.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983042
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983042
-50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $27.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983042
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$270.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983067
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
$6.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983067
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983067
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$159.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983034
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$2.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983034
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.59
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921124
7983034
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM
page 9
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
129685
12/09/92
$911.41
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7983026
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$7.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119921124
7983026
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
-$9.13
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7983026
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
- $26.51
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7936453
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$83.49
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997331
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$1.50
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997331
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
-$0.83
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997331
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$724.31
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997323
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
$5.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997323
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.25
JOHNSON WINE CO.
L119921124
7997323
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$278.30
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997315
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$5.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997315
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
-$2.78
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19921124
7997315
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$27,472.85*
129686
12/09/92
$228.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921124
27686
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$6.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921124
27686
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$122.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921124
27648
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921124
27648
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $60.80
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19921124
CM1117
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
< *>
$299.70*
129687
12/09/92
$720.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
6249778
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$7.20
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
6249778
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$49.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630396
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630396
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,713.76
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630397
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $17.14
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630397
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$49.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630398
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630398
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$538.26
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630399
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$5.38
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630399
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,537.31
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630400
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $25.37
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630400
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
---
12/09/92
$142.15
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630401
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.42
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
630401
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$160.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
631862
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.60
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
631862
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$400.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
631863
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921124
631863
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
<*>
$6,247.87*
129688
12/09/92
$4,399.80
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042614
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $88.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042614
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$26.20
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.26
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
- $26.20
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$0.26
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$26.23
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.26
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042618
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$800.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042739
VERNON SELLING-CST
OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$8.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042739
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$73.44
QUALITY WINE
LI1992,1124
042867
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.47
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042887-
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$4,154.93
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042246
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER MON, DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR,
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129688
12/09/92
- $41.55
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042246
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L11209
12/09/92
$5,125.82
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042611
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $102.52
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042611
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$6,260.47
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042743
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- 562.60
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042743
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$85.56
QUALITY WINE,
L119921124
043083
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$0.86
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
043083
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$240.00
QUALITY WINE`
LI19921124
041429
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.40
QUALITY WINE
L119921124
041429
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,785.01
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042941
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $27.85
QUALITY WINE
L119921124
042941
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$766.94
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042605
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $15.34
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042605
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$73.44
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042686
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.47
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
042686
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$317.26
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
043211
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$6.35
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
043211
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$235.35
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
043273
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ'LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.71
QUALITY WINE
LI19921124
043273
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< ■>
$24,980.87"
129689
12/09/92
$100.00
WORLD CLASS_WINE
LI19921124
13819
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
<•>
$100.00*
129690
11/25/92
$7,500.00
EAST EDINA HOUSING F
TRANSFER TO EEHF
AACT 112592
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
<11>
$7,500.00"
129691
12/09/92
$120.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634140
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.20
EAGLE WINE
L119921202
634140
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,009.11
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634141
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $20.09
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634141
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$303.95
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634143
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$3.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634143
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$534.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634347
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
-$5.34
EAGLE WINE
LI19921202
634347
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
<•>
$2,937.39"
129692
12/09/92
$293.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57832
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$5.86
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119921202
57832
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$515.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57911
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $10.32
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57911
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,034.84
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57731
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L11209
12/09/92
$58.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
58192
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$60.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
58040
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$65.14
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57445
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$896.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57460
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$949.85
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57510
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$716.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57903
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$314.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57720
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$205.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119921202
57902
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$220.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57790
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$58.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57789
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$448.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57833
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$97.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57509
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
$437.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19921202
57459
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:30 PM page 11
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
< *> $7,356.80*
129693 12/09/92
$637.56
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634142
YORK
SELLING
12109192
- $12.75
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634142
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
$4,616.61
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634437
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
- $93.20
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634437
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
$3,264.45
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634438
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $65.29
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634438
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$1,070.99
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634439
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
- $21.42
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
634439
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
$94.37
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635172
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
-$1.89
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635172
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
$721.65
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635282
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
- $14.43
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635282
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
$94.37
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635170
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
-,$1.89
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635170
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
$94.37
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635171
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
-$1.89
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
635171
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
-$7.60
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71407
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
- $300.06
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71411
YORK
SELLING
12/09/92
- $160.57
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71412
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
- $15.36
'GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71413
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$53.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71414
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $53.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71414
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $53.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71414
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$53.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71414
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $53.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19921202
71414
50TH
ST
SELLIN
< *>
$9,844.22*
129694 12/09/92
$1,424.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002271
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$6.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002271
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $28.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002271
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$87.41
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002255
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002255
50TH
ST
SELLIN
-- 12/09/92
-$0.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002255
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$575.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002263
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$5.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002263
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
- $11.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002263
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$535.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002289
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002289
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
-$5.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002289
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$372.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002248
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002248
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
-$3.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002248
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$292.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002297
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002297
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
-$2.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002297
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$55.66
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
7997380
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
7997380
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
-$0.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
7997380
50TH
ST
SELLIN
12/09/92
$1,418.87
JOHNSON
WINE -CO.
LI19921202
8002222
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
$30.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002222
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
- $14.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002222
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
$138.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002214
VERNON
SELLING
12/09/92
$1.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002214
VERNON
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
-CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
TRADE DISCOUN
TRADE DISCOUN
TRADE DISCOUN
TRADE DISCOUN
CST OF GD WIN
TRADE DISCOUN
CST OF GD WIN
TRADE DISCOUN
TRADE DISCOUN
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
L11209
LI1209
LI1209
LI1209
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
MON,
DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 12
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- DESCRIPTION - - -
- - -- --
- -- INVOICE --
PROGRAM
---- - - - - --
OBJECT
- - - --
- P_O_ - # -- - - --
--------
129694
---------------
12/09/92
- -- - --
-$1.38
JOHNSON
WINE
-----------
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002214
8002206
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$1,748.23
59.25
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002206
VERNON SELLING-
CST OF GO LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $34.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002206
8002198
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$1,139.88
$7.00
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002198
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $22.79
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002198
8002180
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$239.11
$2.50
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002180
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
8002180
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209-
12/09/92
$738.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002172
8002172
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$5.50
-$7.39
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002172
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
51,183.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002339
8002339
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$4.50
- $23.68
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002339
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$234.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002305
8002305
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GO WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$3.50
-$2.36
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002305
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$115.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002313
8002313
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$1.00
-$1.16
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002313
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$1,343.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002321
8002321
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$7.50
- 526.87
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO. -.
CO.
LI19921202
8002321
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$276.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
8002347
8002347
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$5.50
-$2.77
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
8002347
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$241.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19921202
LI19921202
7984016
7984016
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$3.50
-$2.41
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19921202
7984016
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$12,070.64*
129695
12/09/92
$55.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921202
LI19921202
27747
27747
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING-
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$3.00
$103.00
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19921202
27787
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
53.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19921202
LI19921202
27787
27746
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$242.00
$5.00
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19921202
27746
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI1209
< *>
$411..00*
129696
12/09/92
$1,164.73
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921202
LI19921202
634343
634343
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
- $11.65
427.14 $404
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921202
634345
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.47
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19921202
LI19921202
634345
634348
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
$172.70
-$1.73
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
COMPANY
LI19921202
634348
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< >
129697
12/09/92
$73.44
QUALITY
WINE'
LI19921202
LI19921202
042866
042866
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
-$1.47
$959.87
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19921202
044109
044109
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
LI1209
12/09/92
12/09/92
- $19.20
$3,443.23
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19921202
LI19921202
044110
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $68.86
QUALITY
WINE'
LI19921202
044110
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
MON, DEC 14,
1992, 9:30 PM
page 13
CHECK# DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129697 12/09/92
$1,528.15
QUALITY
WINE
L119921202
044111
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
- $30.56
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044111
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$542.62
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044185
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$5.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044185
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$2,777.72
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044186
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
- $27.78
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044186
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$972.71
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044188
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$9.73
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044188
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$169.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044398
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$1.69
QUALITY
WINE
L119921202
044398
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$221.08
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044632
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.42
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044632
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$225.32
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044716
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI1209
12/09/92
-$4.51
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044716
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
12/09/92
$227.62
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044774
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI1209
12/09/92
-$2.28
QUALITY
WINE
LI19921202
044774
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI1209
< *>
$10,964.83"
129698 11/30/92
129699 11/30/92
129700 12/09/92
12/09/92
129701 11/30/92
$19.62 PERA PERA 1130 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYA
$19.62"
$29,140.58 PERA PERA 113092 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYA
$29,140.58*
$74.20
$2.00
$76.20*
$20.00
$20.00*
$356,181.61*
SALUD AMERICA
SALUD AMERICA
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19921202 45 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI1209
LI19921202 45 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WIN LI1209
WINE 634345. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY BY CHECK NUMBER MON, DEC 14, 1992, 9:49 PM page L
FUND # 10 $69,716.26
FUND # 50 $286,465.35 f286- ;495.35
$356,181.61* 1.64"