The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-04-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGffi®A a� EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 19, 1993 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. — - - - * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HBA Meeting of April 5. 1993 * II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATIONS - Citizens & Staff - Life Safety * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Council Meeting of April 5, 1993 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Development Plan Approval - 5113 West 50th Street, CSM Investors, Inc. (Contd from 3/15/93) B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Zuppkewood 2nd Addition, Lot 3, Block 1, Zuppkewood (5316 Blake Road) C. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Plan Designation from Industrial to Commercial - Lewis /Kunz Oil Property III. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. Ordinance No. 1993 -5 - An Ordinance Amending Section 1200 and Section 1230 of the City Code to Permit Pushcarts on Public Sidewalks (Contd from 4/5/93) B. Ordinance No. 1993 -6 - An Ordinance Amending Section 220 of the City Code to Permit Certain Prizes for Amusement Devices. IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS 1 _ Agenda Edina City Council, April 19, 1993 Page Two V. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing and Painting (Contract 93 -1) (Contd from 4/5/93) * B. Office Furniture for Braemar Golf Course * C. Portable Radios - Fire Department * D. Fire Fighting Turn -Out Gear * E. Mill Pond Weed Harvesting VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes 'of April 13, 1993 B. Approval of On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer License - Nick's at Southdale — 1127 Southdale Center 't! * C. Approval of Joint Cooperation Agreement - CDBG Funds VII. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS * A. Petition for Alley Paving - Xerxes Avenue Between 64th and 65th Streets VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 04/14/93 Total: $847,441.57 and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 04/08/93 Total: $318,791.24 A -. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Wed Apr 21 Annual Volunteers Reception 5:00 P.M. Edinborough Park Tues Apr, 27 Special Meeting - Award of Bond Sale 5:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon May 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon May 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Wed May 26 AMM Annual Meeting 5:30 P.M. Minnetonka Community Center Mon June 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chamberst �\ Mon June 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 5, 1993 ROLLCAL _ Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF BRA MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1993, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve BRA Minutes of March 15, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and vas seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 31, 1993, and consisting of one page totalling, $15,540.06. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL DATE 4/19/93 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED„ APR 14, 1993, 10:08 PM page 1 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12418 04/19/93 $42.81 HUGHES, GORDON MISCELLANEOUS 033193 CENTENNIAL LAK MISC <�> $42.81" 12419 04/19/93 $2,500.00 NORDQUIST SIGN COMPA RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEME 16394 CENTENNIAL LAK RESID IMPROVE <�> $2,500.00" $2,542.81" COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, APR 14, 1993, 10:31 PM page 1 ----------------------------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FUND # 01 $2,542.81 $2,542.81" W 9. Proclamation of Appreciation Recipients Civilians MaryJean Sampson ............ Nurse ..................... Byerly's MargoWatkins ................ Nurse ..................... Byerly's Byerly's Staff KimCameron ............. ............................... Byerly's Mike Maley ............... Store Manager .................. Byerly's Jim Bickford ............. General Manager ................. Byerly's Edina Engine 82 Greg Smegal .............. Fire Lieutenant ........ Double Heart Attack Ron Samuelson .............. Firefighter .......... Double Heart Attack Bill Lutts ...................Fire Inspector ......... Double Heart Attack Pat Running ............ Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Edina Rescue 393 Wally Fasulo ............ Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Edina Communication Center Mike Short ........... Communication Specialist ..... Double Heart Attack Patty Kane ............ Public Safety Dispatcher ..... Double Heart Attack Hennepin County Rescue • Cliff Hill ................... Paramedic ........... Double Heart Attack Jim Sundberg ................ Paramedic ........... Double Heart Attack Edina Rescue 394 Bob Lawson ............. Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Jeff Siems .............. Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Edina Police Phil Larsen .................. Officer ............ Double Heart Attack Brandon Deshler .............. Officer ............ Double Heart Attack Tom Johnson ................. Sergeant ........... Double Heart Attack Mark Limbeck ................ Officer ............ Double Heart Attack Mike Siitari ................. Lieutenant .......... Double Heart Attack Edina Engine 82 Greg Smegal .............. Fire Lieutenant ........ Double Heart Attack Ron Samuelson .............. Firefighter .......... Double Heart Attack Bill Lutts ...................Fire Inspector ......... Double Heart Attack Pat Running ............ Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Edina Rescue 393 Wally Fasulo ............ Paramedic/Firefighter ...... Double Heart Attack Edina Communication Center Mike Short ........... Communication Specialist ..... Double Heart Attack Patty Kane ............ Public Safety Dispatcher ..... Double Heart Attack NO IV Saturday February 20, 1993 Cardiac Arrest at Byerly's Restaurant on France Avenue Katherine Ritchie (Deceased victim) On February 20, 1993, an Edina resident suffered a cardiac arrest at Byerly's Restaurant on France Avenue in Edina. Three store employees immediately responded: Kim Cameron, a restaurant employee, and store manager Mike Maley started CPR. Just one week earlier Kim had been certified in CPR skills at Edina High School. Meanwhile, Byerly's General Manager, Jim Bickford, called 9 -1 -1 and then, over the store's loud speakers, made a plea for additional help. Nurses Mary Jean Sampson and Margo Watkins abandoned their shopping and rushed to the restaurant where they assisted Ms. Cameron until Edina Police and Paramedics arrived seconds later. Here's a quote from Assistant Fire Chief Terry Kehoe that, for me, sums up pretty well what happened at Byerly's: "All of these people went way beyond the normal range of helping their fellow citizen, and while unfortunately the patient did not survive, the idea that people in our community will reach out to help others is comforting for all of us to know and appreciate." is 1* Monday, March 1, 1993 Double Cardiac Arrest While eating dinner at home on Monday, March 1, 1993, Edina resident Earnest Nelson suddenly became quite ill. His wife Virginia called 9 -1 -1 and spoke with Patty Kane, Public Safety Dispatcher. Her partner Mike Short, Communication Specialist, dispatched Officers Phil Larsen and Brandon Deshler as first responders to the scene. He also dispatched Edina Rescue 394, Paramedics Bob Lawson and Jeff Siems. As police arrived, Mr. Nelson collapsed into full cardiac arrest. Thoroughly trained in rescue techniques, Officers Larsen and Deshler began CPR immediately. Paramedics arrived quickly and began to stabilize Mr. Nelson. While they were attending to him, Mrs. Nelson, who was understandably upset and worried about her husband's condition, also collapsed into cardiac arrest. Paramedics Lawson and Siems called for assistance. Officer Mark Limbeck, Sergeant Tom Johnson and Lieutenant Mike Siitari arrived, followed by Edina Fire Engine 82 crew members Fire Lieutenant Greg Smegal, Paramedic /Firefighter Pat Running, Firefighter Ron Samuelson and Fire Inspector Bill Lutts. Dispatchers called for Rescue 393, because two ambulances would now' be needed to transport the Nelsons to the emergency room. To backup Edina's effort and standing ready to assist at this rescue or to respond to another Edina 9 -1 -1 call were Hennepin County Paramedics Cliff Hill and Jim Sundberg. Medics continued to administer CPR, both to Mr. and Mrs. Nelson. The LIFEPAC TEN, rescue equipment that acts as a heart monitor and electronic heart defibrillator, allowed medics to monitor and defibrillate both patients alternately. Fairview Southdale Hospital emergency staff, now in contact with Paramedic Siems, didn't believe the equipment could perform this way and advised the medics to try to save the patient that seemed most likely to survive. But Siems and Lawson continued to try to save both, monitor-- defib -- monitor - -- defib, until the Nelsons could be taken to the hospital. Because of their skill and quick action, Paramedics Lawson and Siems were able to stabilize both patients. The Nelsons are now doing well. Simultaneous cardiac arrests are very rare when not related to a mass emergency of some sort and Edina got a lot of very positive international press coverage as a result of the efforts of the people you see here tonight. What particularly pleases me about both of these incidents is that our public safety system works so well. Cooperation among Edina Police, Fire and Paramedic personnel, not to mention superb coordination among our neighboring cities and Hennepin County, insures that Edina will be able to handle any emergency that comes our way. [END] m MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL IM AT CITY HATS. APRIL 5. 1993 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1993, APPROVED Notion vas made by Member Kelly and vas seconded by Member Smith to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting of March 15, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED - MURPHY AUTOMOTIVE (5100 VERNON AVENUE) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen informed Council that the subject property, 5100 Vernon Avenue, is located on the north side of Vernon Avenue and immediately west of Summit Avenue. It is zoned PCD -4, Planned Commercial District and at present is developed with a automobile service center (Union Oil station). The facility sells gasoline and related products and has four service bays. Tim Murphy, owner of the property has submitted a petition to completely redevelop the site as an automobile service center with no gasoline sales. The redeveloped facility would have eight service bays, two express lube and oil bays, a car wash and a showroom office area. The proposal was considered on two occasions by the Planning Commission. On February 24, 1993, the Commission voted to approve the Final Development Plan subject to a revised landscaping plan. On March 31, 1893, the proponent presented a modified landscaping plan which the Commission approved. Planner Larsen pointed out that the redevelopment proposal is linked to a request to vacate a portion of Summit Avenue adjacent to the site, which vacation request is on the Council agenda this date. The portion of Summit Avenue lying north of the subject north property line was vacated in 1984 to allow development of the Summit Point Apartments and Interlachen Point townhouses. The proponent has stated that the adjacent property owner to the east has agreed to transfer the east one -half of the right of way. Staff would recommend vacation of the street subject to conditions contained in the City Engineer's report: 1) private cross easements for adjacent properties to north and east, and 2) maintenance of public safety and pedestrian access to Summit Point. Currently, by agreement with the City, Summit Point is responsible for maintaining this section of Summit Avenue. Staff would recommend releasing Summit Point from this obligation transferring responsibility to the owner of the subject property who would receive the vacated property. The original plan provided 50 parking spaces around the perimeter of the site. The Commission felt there was inadequate landscaping with too much asphalt, and that the seven parking spaces parallel to Vernon Avenue be eliminated because parking was over code. The revised plan does eliminate the seven parking spaces adjacent to Vernon Avenue and replaces those with landscaping materials. In addition, it eliminates two parking spaces along the westerly side of the property; one would preserve an existing tree while the other would.provide space for new landscape materials. Also, six spaces east of the service bays have been removed to create a landscaped island with a sidewalk along the easterly side of the island to allow pedestrian access from Summit Point and the townhouses to the north. A privacy fence is proposed along the west property line to provide screening for the single family homes to the west. The fence is illustrated as a saw tooth fashion to give some relief to the "long wall" look. Because the landscaping improvements would reduce the number of parking stalls to 33, a 10 space parking quantity variance is required. Planner Larsen advised Council that the modified plan has been reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as to.emergency vehicle access for residents of Summit Point. The Planning Commission would recommend approval of.the proposed Final Development Plan as modified, subject to a Proof of Parking Agreement. Member Rice asked if cars would need to cross the sidewalk to enter the car wash and what the parking requirements were for the car wash. Planner Larsen responded that, if there were a line, cars would have to cross the sidewalk.' He clarified that there are no parking space requirements for a service bay but four stacking spaces are required for the accessory car wash. Member Rice then asked about trash storage and signage. Planner Larsen said that trash storage would be in the northwest corner of the property and that full screening would be required. He said that Tim Murphy, the proponent, was present and could explain the proposed signage. Member Smith asked about noise affecting Summit Point residents when trash is . picked up and who proposed vacating Summit Avenue. Planner Larsen explained that no Summit Point apartments orient to the south and the proposed vacation of Summit Avenue initiated with the proponent. Presentation by Proponent Tim Murphy, proponent, clarified that after consulting with staff he decided to move the free standing sign back along side the building. The one -sided sign will have three panels: 1) Texaco emblem at the top, 2) panel reading 'Express Lube', and 3) a changeable reader board at the bottom. Total square footage for the sign is well within allowed maximum. Regarding cash wash stacking, Mr. Murphy explained the existing Summit Avenue will be utilized accommodating five vehicles. The trash storage area will be concrete brick to match the building and will be relatively large because of tire storage. Projected trash pick -up would be weekly at a maximum. Public Comment Joan Lonsbury, 5904 Drew Avenue South, informed Council that she is on the Board of Directors-for Summit Point Apartments, the HUD project built by the City of Edina and the Edina churches in 1986. She spoke to her letter of February 25, 1993, which expressed concern about removal of the sidewalk and safety of the residents who need to walk down Summit Avenue and-along Vernon Avenue. Ms. Lonsbury said she was unclear how the proposed vacation would affect the agreement with the City dated July 2, 1986, concerning Summit Avenue. Planner Larsen interjected that under the agreement Summit Point was responsible for maintaining the section of Summit Avenue which lay south of their property line. Mayor Richards explained that if the vacation is approved, it would require the transfer of that obligation from Summit Point to the property owner who would acquire the street right of way. Nothing would change concerning the rights of public pedestrian ingress /egress. Ms. Lonsbury pointed out that because of their involvement with HUD she wanted to be sure that this would somehow be in writing. Bob Faloon, member of Board of Directors for Summit Point, expressed thanks for the cooperation of everyone involved with this proposal. He said the Board would like to be involved with aspects of the fence and the landscaping adjacent to Summit Point Apartments. Mr. Murphy said that the current plan shows a six foot fence but that he would be open to any suggestions. Mayor Richards commented that the Board should come to a consensus on the issues of the fence height and the trees. Member Rice made a motion for adoption of the following resolution, subject to a Proof of Parking Agreement incorporating screening requirements for the adjacent property to the north (Summit Point Apartments): RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MURPHY AUTOMOTIVE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Murphy Automotive, 5100 Vernon Avenue, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 5, 1933, be and is hereby approved. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED GRANTING PRELIZIINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR JYL.AND DENNIS ADDITION Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen recalled that on March 1, 1993, the Council granted the vacation of the common lot easement and partial vacation of a conservation easement for Lot 1, Block 1, Jyland Whitney Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Peter Andrea Addition, subject to certain conditions. One of the conditions was that the two lots be combined to make one lot. The purpose of the vacation was to allow the development of the properties with -a single home building site. Although the combination of properties is procedurally treated as a lot division, the result would be a new single lot plat. If at some time in the future the home were removed or destroyed only one home could be rebuilt; it would not revert to two building sites. With the exception that a building permit has not been issued, all other conditions to the vacation imposed by the Council have been met. Staff would recommend approval of the lot division that would result in a single lot plat. Planner Larsen advised that the plat presented is in final plat form. Member Smith asked how the City could be sure that the home is constructed at existing ground levels. Planner Larsen explained that finished grades would not be exactly as they exist now in raw condition. The City would have control over the ultimate grades through the land alteration permit process. Mayor Richards then called for comment by the proponent or the public. No comment or objection was heard. Member Smith made a motion to grant preliminary plat approval for the Jyland Dennis Addition. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Member Kelly offered an amendment to the motion to grant preliminary and final plat approval as follows: RESOLUTION GRANTING PREL73UNARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR JYLAND DENNIS ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "JYIAND DENNIS ADDITION", platted by John Dennis and Maryanne Demnis, husband and wife, and Norrest Bank Minnesota, National Association, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 5, 1993, be and is hereby granted preliminary and final plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Mayor Richards called for vote on the motion to amend. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Mayor Richards then called for vote on the main motion as amended. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC H RING CONDUCTED: YEAR XIX CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted on the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Year XIX. Planner Larsen stated that for Year XIX, Hennepin County has been allotted $3,327,000 of which $178,458 is allocated to Edina. This allocation reflects an 18% increase over Year XVIII attributed to the utilization of 1990 Census data. On March 23, 1993, Planning staff presented a proposed budget to the Human Relations Commission. The Commission recommended approval but asked the Planning staff to research the distribution of the Day Care Subsidy funds for future years. Of particular concern to the Commission was the fact that $12,567 of Years XVII and XVIII day care funds remain unspent, yet 32 Edina residents are on the waiting list to receive day care subsidy. The proposed budget includes: PROJECT BUDGET Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 40,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 100,766 Adaptive Recreation 2,000 Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) 24,074 Day Care Subsidy 10,000 C.A.S.H. HOME Line 1.618 TOTAL $178,458 Rehabilitation of Private Property - Support to single family property owners for rehabilitation projects who qualify on an income basis. Removal of Architectural Barriers - Work is continuing within the City to remove architectural barriers to include: 1) accessible walkways and entrances to public facilities, e.g. the Historic Center, the Vernon Avenue Liquor Store, Golf Dome, and the Fire Station, 2) to remove accessibility barriers by working with play equipment, drinking fountains, existing rest rooms at Highlands Park, Wooddale Park, Lake Edina Park and Normandale Park, and 3) signage to identify rest rooms and public facilities. Work is continuing also on access curb -cuts throughout the City.. Adaptive Recreation - The proposed amount for Adaptive Recreation's sign language interpreter was reduced as the demand was less than previously budgeted. Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) - Proposed budget for H.O.M.E, is at a level less than was requested ($26,700) but reflects a $2,074 increase. Day Care Subsidy - The proposed budget reflects a $1,818 increase for the Day Care allotment which was cut nearly 50 percent (to $8,181) in year XVIII. C.A.S.H. HOME Line - A new program applicant is requesting $1,618 to service Edina's portion of their HOME line program (renter assistance). The proposed.budget for these three service agencies (H.O.M.E., Day Care Subsidy and C.A.S.H. HOME Line) total $35,692. Planner Larsen noted that the Day Care Subsidy program is handled through Greater Minneapolis Day Care. A committee has been appointed through South Hennepin Human Services that will examining this on a multi - community basis within the next year. Planner Larsen responded to Member Kelly that funds allocated to the Rehabilitation of Private Property for Year XVIII will be expended by July 1, 1993. He explained that people learn of the program from the Sun - Current, by word of mouth,'and Scouts have delivered flyers to homeowners targeting a certain area. Grace Norris, Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association, thanked Council for .their continued financial support in helping families move towards self- sufficiency. Currently five Edina families are receiving help and 36 are on a waiting list for funding either by Edina.as an interim -step and then with Hennepin County. Ms. Norris briefly explained how.the system works and the costs for day care. Member Paulus said her concern was that Edina families be moved along at the same rate as families from other communities. Sharon Johnson, Executive Director of C.A.S.H., expressed appreciation for Year XIX funding. She said they are an anti - poverty agency serving all Hennepin suburbs and work closely with SHeRPA and other human service organizations. The focus of C.A.S.H. has been in meeting a growing need for affordable housing in the suburbs, not with funding, but with finding a logical solution to a housing problem. HOME Line was opened in January 1992, and has received over 3,000 calls to date, .74 of which were from Edina residents. In November,.they began a home foreclosure prevention program and have received approximately 100 calls, four from Edina. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR 1993 (YEAS =) OF THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCS GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, and held a public hearing on April 5, 1993, to obtain the views of citizens on local and urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's proposed use of $178,458 from the Year = Urban Hennepin County CDBG. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Edina approves the following projects for funding from the Year = Urban Hennepin County CDBG program related and applicable program income and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the Year = Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds: PROJECT BUDGET Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 40,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 100,766 Adaptive Recreation 2.000 Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) 24,074 Day Care Subsidy 10,000 C.A.S.H. HOME Line 1.618 TOTAL $178.458 ADOPTED this 5th day of April. 1993. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. NOTIFICATION GIVEN OF HOMART DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL IN BLOOMINGTON_ Planner Larsen reminded Council that the 1985 Settlement Agreement with Homart Development Company required that the City be notified of additional development on the Homart site in Bloomington (Minnesota Center). The City has received a site plan which proposes a 136,000 square foot retail center as an interim use for the property. The proposed development is well below the 2,550 P.M. peak trips limit contained in the Agreement. No action required by the Council. *HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith setting April 19, 1993, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1. Preliminary Plat Approval - Zuppkewood 2nd Addition, Lot 3, Block 1, Zuppkewood (5316 Blake Road). 2. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Planned Industrial District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District - Plan Designation from Industrial to Commercial (Levis/Kunz Oil Property). Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. s RESOLUTION ADOPTED VACATING SUMMIT AVENUE (PORTION LYING SOUTH OF NORTH LINE OF LOT 6. BLACK 4. GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the proposed vacation of Summit Avenue (portion lying South of North line of Lot 6, Block 4, Grand View Heights) should be considered in conjunction with the Final Development Plan for Murphy Automotive, 5100 Vernon Avenue. The only remaining public portion of Summit-Avenue extends from the north line of the Murphy Automotive property to its intersection with Vernon Avenue. Staff would recommend vacating this portion of Summit Avenue subject to: 1) private cross easements for adjacent properties to the north and east, and 2) maintenance of public safety and pedestrian access to Summit Point Apartments, and 3) release of Summit Point Apartments from its current responsibility for maintaining this section of Summit Avenue. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption as follows, subject to: 1) private cross - easements for adjacent properties to the north and east, 2) maintenance of public safety and pedestrian access to Summit Point Apartments, and 3) release of Summit Point Apartments from its responsibility for maintaining this section of Summit Avenue: RESOLUTION VACATING SUMMIT AVENUE WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 16th day of February, 1993, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of Summit Avenue: WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 5th day of.April, 1993, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, cable, or telephone poles and lines, gas and sever lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street /easement or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described street is hereby vacated effective as of April 6, 1993: That part of Summit Avenue as dedicated in the plat of GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part of Summit Avenue lying South of the North line of Lot 6, Block 4, GRAND VIEV HEIGHTS and North of County Road No. 158 (Vernon Avenue). The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED VACATING ALLEY SOUTH OF LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 5 AND WEST OF LOTS 3 THRU 11, BLOCK 5. BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council heard the petition to vacate the alley south of Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, and west of Lots 3 thru 11, Block 5, all in Brookside Heights on March 15, 1993. The alley has no public usage and has not been improved. The north /south portion of the platted alley is only half the normal width but has existing power line poles. Northern States Power and Paragon Cable have asked the right to service and maintain their lines located on the north /south alley portion. The request was initiated by the City because the land strip has been subject to dumping of debris. At the March 15, 1993, meeting the Council continued the matter and asked staff to obtain further input from the abutting property owners concerning possible options. On March 30, 1993, a letter was mailed advising that the staff recommendation was to vacate the public alley land and that the Council was seeking opinions on the following options: A) Do not vacate the alley land. Leave as is for possible future construction of an alley. B) Vacate the alley land. Each property owner could file to pick -up the vacated adjacent alley land and attach it to their property. City Assessor does not anticipate a change of property value as a result of such action. C) Construct a public alley. Estimated cost per property of $3,500 to $4,500 would be spread over ten years as a special assessment. The cost is high as little benefit is gained by land west of the alley. Engineer Hoffman reported that there were five responses, property owners at 5020 and 5028 Oxford Avenue did not want the alley vacated, property owners at 5016 and 5044 Oxford thought the alley should be vacated, and Mr. Zachman, 5343 Interlachen Boulevard, deferred to the wishes of the residents on the north /south portion of the alley. Mr. Zachman's main issue was to seek removal of a butternut tree located on the alley land adjacent to his lot. Northern States Power had indicated that they would grant enough land at no cost if the City eventually wanted to put in the alley. Vito LoPesio, 5044 Oxford Avenue, said he felt the alley should not be constructed because of the cost and that the alley should probably be vacated. No further comments or objections were heard. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved approval: .RESOLUTION VACATING ALLEY WHEREAS, .a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 16th day of February, 1993, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of Alley: WHEREAS, two weeks, published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 5th day of April, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said alley vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, cable, or telephone poles and lines, gas and sever lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street /easement or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described alley is hereby vacated effective as of April 6, 1993: That part of public alley as dedicated in the plat of BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part of public alley lying South of Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS, and lying Westerly of Lots 3 through 11, Block 5, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith Nays: Paulus, Richards Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO 1993 -4 (AMENDING SECTION 1050 OF THE CITY CODE TO UPDATE STATUTORY REFERENCES AND REQUIREMENTS) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Assistant Manager Hughes explained that Ordinance No. 1993 -4, updates statutory references to Code Section 1050 - Maintenance of Vegetation. No substantive changes to this Section are made by virtue of the proposed ordinance amendment. Staff would recommend adoption with waiver of Second Reading. Member Rice moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -4 as follows, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -4 AN ORDINANCE SECTION 1050 OF THE CITY CODE TO UPDATE STATUTORY REFERENCES AND REQUIxF.MENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The definition of "Weed" in Subsection 1050.02 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Weed. (i) Any plant which is identified by the State Commissioner of Agriculture as a noxious weed or secondary noxious weed pursuant to M.S. 18.77, Subd. 8, or (ii) any volunteer plant, except trees and other woody vegetation, which is not customarily or intentionally planted." Section 2. Subsection 1050.08 is hereby amended to read as follows: "1050.08 Abatement. Subd. 1 Nuisance. Any vegetation which does not meet the requirements of this Section is declared to be a nuisance. Subd. 2 Conditions Allowing Inspector to Enter Property. The weed inspector or assistant weed inspector of the City, or persons authorised by the weed inspector may enter upon property to cut, remove, destroy and eradicate vegetation declared to be a nuisance under this Section.. Entry by the weed inspector, assistant weed inspector or persons authorized by the weed inspector or assistant reed inspector, for the purpose of cutting, removing, destroying or eradicating vegetation shall be done only after written notice is served upon the owner, and the occupant if other than the owner, of the property to be entered, and failure of the owner or occupant to cut down, remove, destroy or eradicate vegetation declared to be a nuisance, within the time, and in such manner, as the weed inspector or assistant weed inspector shall designate in the notice. The notice shall be given in the meaner prescribed by M.S. 18.83, Subd. 2, and shall allow a minimum of seven days for the property owner or occupant to comply with requirements of the notice. - - Subd. 3 Owner's Responsibility for Costs Incurred. The costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with entering a property pursuant to Subd. 2 of this Subsection and cutting, removing, destroying and eradicating vegetation declared to be a nuisance, shall be paid by the owner or occupant of the property entered pursuant to a notice containing the information and served as prescribed by M.S. 18.83, Subd. 7. If the City is not paid the amount stated in the notice within 30 days or before the following October 1, whichever is later, such amount shall become a lien in favor of the City and a penalty of eight percent shall be added to the amount due as of that date and the total cost, expenses and penalties shall be certified to the auditor of Hennepin County for entry as a tax upon such property for collection as other real estate taxes are collected, all pursuant to the provisions of H.S. 18.83, Subd. 7" Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -5 (AN MING SECTION 1200 AND SECTION 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS) CONTINUED TO 4/19/93 Assistant Manager Hughes advised that a letter dated March 30, 1993, has been received from Pat Asplund, owner of Cuppa Java in the Edina 5 -0 Mall at 50th and France asking permission to operate a beverage cart on the public sidewalk in the 50th and France area on weekends during the summer months. After reviewing the City Code, staff concluded that two sections of the Code would prohibit such use. Section 1200 prohibits the placement of corn - poppers, peanut- roasters, ice cream containers, vending or food carts or islands on public sidewalks. Section 1230 prohibits the sale of any product or property from a public sidewalk. Staff believes that food and beverage carts would be a very desirable amenity for the 50th and France area in that shopping is very pedestrian oriented and the area has generous sidewalks and plazas. Ordinance No. 1993 -5 has been drafted that would permit the placement and operation of food and beverage pushcarts in the 50th and France area, subject to written approval of the City Manager. The amendment would provide that only pushcarts that serve food and beverages would be permitted. Therefore, pushcarts selling merchandise or food products requiring further preparation would not be allowed. All pushcarts would require licensing by the Health Department, in accordance with Section 720, the Food Code. Assistant Manager Hughes noted that Pat Asplund of Cuppa Java and Karen Knudsen, Executive Director of the 50th and France Association, were present and could answer any questions. Pat Asplund, Cuppa Java, showed a graphic of the proposed pushcart and said that it would add European ambience to the 50th and France area. The pushcart would be green with brass accents, would be rolled into place on the plaza near Edina 5 -0 during summer weekend days and returned to storage via a freight elevator during times of non -use. Ms. Asplund said she intended to have the pushcart built for use at the Edina Art Fair and Crazy Days. Ms. Knudsen observed that the matter of pushcarts has not been discussed by the Association but individual members have indicated support, including by letter Sally Robson, Association President. Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that a more definite ordinance needs to be drafted that would address the following issues: 1) limit on number of permits issued, 2) permit tied to tenants at 50th and France, 3) dates use permitted, 4) storage, 5) trash, 6) license fee, and 7) assignment to a specific location. Member Kelly made a motion to continue the matter to April 19, 1993, to allow a more definitive amendment to be drafted . Motion seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR GREENS MOWER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a walk behind greens mower to recommended low bidder, Scharber & Sons, Inc., John Deere,.at $7,221.76. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TESTER Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a traffic signal tester to recommended low bidder, Brown Traffic, Products, Inc., at $6,177.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *AVARD OF BID FOR WATER TOWER CI.F.ANING. REPAIRING AND PAINTING CONTINUED TO 4/19/93 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded.by Member Smith to continue the award of bid for water tower cleaning, repairing and painting to April 19, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SAND ROCK BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CONCRETE AND WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to recommended low bidders as follows: Sand (delivered) to SA- AG, Inc. at $3.28 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock at $14.85 per ton; Class II (delivered) to Ed Braemar at $5.40 per ton; Asphalt #2331* (picked up) to Midwest Asphalt at•$17.20 per ton; Asphalt #2331 Fine* to Midwest Asphalt at $17.70 per ton; Asphalt #2341* to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. at $18.50 per ton; Winter Mix to Midwest Asphalt at $45.00 per ton; Concrete (delivered) to AVR, Inc. at $50.50 per cubic yard; Cut -Back Asphalt (delivered) to Koch Refining at .7748 per gallon; Alternate.Cut -Back Asphalt (CRS2).to Koch Refining at .4828 per gallon; *alternate award on asphalt to either Midwest Asphalt or Bituminous Roadways if low bid plant is down when asphalt needed; Water Treatment Chemicals for City Wells to Dixie Petro -Chem, Inc., at $32.75 per 100 lbs. each of hydrofluosilicic acid and liquid chlorine; Caustic Soda to Dixie Petro Chem, Inc. at $1.80 per gallon; and Diatomaceos Earth to Dixie Petro Chem, Inc. at $9.50 per bag. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TANDEM DUMP TRUCK Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for tandem dump truck to Lakeland Ford Track Sales at $61,848.16, per-State of MN.Contract No. 79- 382 - 02530. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CITIZENS APPOINTED'TO- SEXUALLY ORIENTED STUDY C0IHEITTEE Mayor Richards reminded Council that at the meeting of March 15, 1993, Council authorized establishment of a citizen committee to study the impacts of sexually oriented businesses on the City. -He presented the following named- individuals to fairly represent the interest of the City as a whole: Alan Ackerberg, Jim Fee, David Hays, Amy Johnson, Sydney Johnson, Mike Lewis, John Lonsbury, Helen McClelland, Laura McWethy, Cappy Moore, Janet Nelson, Bob Rydman, Virginia Shaw, Ted Start and Lois Wilder. Mayor Richards recommended Council concurrence with the appointments and the request that the committee file its report to the Council on or before June 7, 1993. He suggested that Virginia Shaw and Mike Lewis be named Co- Chairs of the committee. Mayor Richards then presented a proposed 'Committee Charge' that gave background information, set out the committee's task and timeline for final report back to the Council. Member Smith made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointments of the individuals, as named and presented, to serve on the Sexually Oriented Businesses Study Committee and for approval of the Committee Charge as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REPORT ON VIERKANT DISPOSAL COMPLAINT Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to a memorandum from Sanitarian Velde concerning the complaint made by Gary Vierkant ( Vierkant Disposal) at the March 15, 1993, Council meeting. Mr. Vierkant had claimed that his competitors were offering a lower priced refuse collection service to customers if they brought their refuse to the curb for collection. He further claimed that residents were not abiding by the law, the City was not enforcing the law and that if other haulers were offering curbside pickup of refuse, he would also offer the curbside option. Mr. Vierkant reported 13 residents in Morningside that had refuse at the curb. A letter was sent to each and conversations with five of the 13 revealed a variety of reasons why they brought their refuse to the curb. None of the five were told by their hauler to bring the refuse on the curb for collection. The ordinance is enforced on a complaint only basis. Information is provided to all homeowners on a yearly basis about the regulations addressing curbside refuse storage. Residents are also advised about these requirements in flyers distributed by Welcome Wagon, Newcomers and realtor packets. Gary Vierkant, Vierkant Disposal, thanked the City for the response to his complaint. He said that he had driven other neighborhoods, (Brookview, Hillside, Lee Valley) where he had found that residents in excess of 30 percent had left refuse at curbside for pickup. Mayor Richards observed that from the information presented there seems to be no evidence that haulers are asking their customers to bring refuse to the curb. Mr. Vierkant said residents have told him that the individual driver, not the company, had asked that refuse be placed at the curb. He suggested that City employees who drive the City be designated the responsibility to report areas of violations. Mayor Richards asked Manager Rosland to continue monitoring the issue together with the Recycling Commission according to City policy. No formal action was taken. FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED ON STORM WATER PROJECTS: I? MOVEMENTS ORDERED Engineer Hoffman presented a feasibility report on proposed storm sewer projects and explained that four projects have been reviewed and are feasible and consistent with the stormwater management and watershed district goals. The projects, which are to be funded from the stormwater utility fund, are as follows. Imp. No. Location Estimated Cost STS -221 Easement Line from Back Yard to Tower St. $ 7,953.12 STS -222 Parkwood Rd. from Blake Rd. to Schaefer Rd. $80,830.85 STS -223 Schaefer Rd. - Easement Between Lots 12 & 13, Block 3, Killarney Shores Addition $10,816.96 STS -224 Vernon & Gleason Intersection Overflow $30,083.20 Member Smith made a motion to proceed with the construction of the storm sewer projects as presented and to be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: STS -221 Easement Line from Back Yard to Tower.Street STS -222 Parkwood Road from Blake Road to Schaefer Road STS -223 Schaefer Road - Easement Between Lots 12 & 13, Block 3, Killarney Shores Addition STS -224 Vernon Avenue & Gleason Road Intersection Overflow and moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -221, STS -222, STS -223 & STS -224 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF'EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer, and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sum and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, OTA 55424 HEIOISPIN COUNTY, MMMOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CONTRACT 93 -3 (ERG) IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -221, STS -222. STS -223 & STS -224 BIDS CLOSE APRIL 29, 1993 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, April 29, 1993. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 3, 1993 to consider said bids. The following are approziwate major quantities: 1540 CY Com a Excavation 1061 TOPS Cl. 5A Aggregate Base 584 TONS Bituminous Patching 1945 LF 12" -18" PVC Pipe 4 EA Standard Xanholea 4 EA Catch Basins Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail, or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in the plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and Specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond.or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED TOBACCO LEGISLATION (S.F. 881) Sanitarian Velde informed Council that Senate File 881 proposes to increase the excise tax on cigarette packs by 23 cents. Studies show that this increase would result in a five percent reduction in cigarette consumption. The increased revenue would be used for health promotion activities. Also, it has been found that youth will access tobacco products by shoplifting. The proposed bill would limit access to single pack tobacco products by eliminating customer self- service in less than 10 pack cartons amounts. Sanitarian Velde reported that the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee met on March 31, 1993, and drafted a proposed resolution in support of the legislation and recommended adoption by the Council. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption for forwarding to Edina's legislators: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Edina City Council, as the Community Health Board, has responsibility to protect and promote the health of its residents; and WHEREAS, tobacco is the largest contributor to preventable disease and premature death; and WHEREAS, reduction of tobacco use among youth requires a comprehensive approach such as that recommended by the Minnesota Health Care Commission to the Governor and Legislature; and WHEREAS, the Edina Comity Health Services Advisory Committee supports this resolution and recommends its adoption; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council supports legislative action to reduce tobacco use among youth by increasing the excise tax and restricting youth access to tobacco products as set forth in Senate File 881 and House File 1262. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith Nays: Rice, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Rice commented that he could not lend support to the legislature to increase taxes on anything. Mayor Richards said he concurred with Member Rice. RESIGNATION ON PLANNING COMUSSION NOTED Mayor Richards informed Council that he had received a letter dated April 1, 1993 from John Palmer indicating his resignation from the Planning Commission. -He asked that Council give him names of potential candidates for appointment to fill the unexpired term. HOUSE METROPOLITAN REORGANIZATION BILLS FOR 1993 AND HOUSING LEGISIATION DISCUSSED Manager Rosland referred to information regarding House Metropolitan Reorganization Bills for 1993, together with a letter from Mayor Willis Branning of Apple Valley urging the Council to contact legislators regarding the effects of this legislation on the suburban communities. Mayor Branning had commented that the bills as proposed fall far short of resolving the related problems (urban blight, inner -city poverty, substandard housing) and would penalize suburban communities because of differing socio- economic demographics. Manager Rosland said that of particular concern was H.F. 671, sponsored by Representative Orfield, which is moving out of committee. Under this proposed bill the Metropolitan Council would assign and administer housing goals against which penalties (loss of municipal aid) would be assessed for cities regarding availability affordable housing. H.F. 641 ( Orfield) would create an elected Metropolitan Council, and proposes to eliminate several agencies, i.e. Metropolitan Airports Commission, Regional Transit Board, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and Metropolitan Sports Facilities-Commission. The legislation would transfer ownership, powers and duties of these agencies to the Council and would establish three operating divisions (waste control, airports and sports facilities). It also would abolish the Metropolitan Mosquito Control Commission. Three other bills dealing with the Metropolitan Council have been introduced in the House. Member Smith commented that Representative Orfield is picking up support for his underlying philosophy of promoting metropolitan governance versus local government. Member Rice said he understood that Senator Mondale from St. Louis Park is one of the sponsors of the companion Senate bill and questioned whether the impact on St. Louis Park would be that much different from that on Edina. Member Kelly said she felt the agenda is to try to protect the inner -city and control growth. Each city is competing and this is an attempt to make the Metropolitan Council the overseer. From speaking with elected officials who are opposed to Orfield's legislation, Member Smith emphasized that Representative Orfield's agenda is regional government and that he is picking up suburban support. Member Smith said this is a vital issue and suggested that the City become more proactive instead of being reactive. Mayor Richards asked if Edina's legislators were opposing Orfield's legislation and suggested that they be contacted to be sure this is the case. Member Smith added that he felt opposition support needs to be acquired from other suburban cities in addition in order to make any impact. GRANDVIEV AREA TRAFFIC STUDY DISCUSSED Manager Rosland informed the Council that the Watson Development presented a proposal to the Planning Commission for the Lewis Engineering site that proposed a Rainbow Food store together with a fast - food restaurant. The issue will be on the Council's agenda for Apri1.19, 1993. If approved it would mean an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for change of land usage. Because traffic is a major issue, he asked if Council desired staff to initiate an independent traffic study prior to that meeting. It was the consensus of the Council to hear the proposal before deciding if an independent traffic study should be ordered. REMMER OF MEETING DATES Manager Rosland reminded Council of upcoming meeting dates: April 7, 1993 Richfield City Hall (10 A.M.) - Discussion on High Speed Transit Concept April 17, 1993 Strategic Planning Session, Arneson Acres (8 -12 A.M.) Transportation Issues May 26, 1993 AMM Annual meeting (5:30 P.M.) - Minnetonka Community Center PUBLIC BEARING M.D ON PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS: RESOLUTION ADOPTED CALLING FOR SALE Assistant Manager Hughes presented staff's recommendation that Council authorize receiving bids for the refunding of four existing bond issues. All four issues are General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds. Two of the issues are associated with the Centennial Lakes /Edinborough project, one issue is associated with the 50th and France Redevelopment Project and one is associated with the Grandview Redevelopment Project. Due to the current long -term interest rate environment, staff believes that substantial savings will be realized through the this refunding. If Council authorizes the sale, bids would be accepted on Tuesday, April 27, 1993. This schedule would necessitate a special meeting of the Council at 5:00 P.M. on April 27, 1993, to consider the bids. Due to the current fluctuation of interest rates, staff feels that time is of the essence and therefore would recommend a special meeting in this case. Assistant Manager Hughes referred to a pre -sale report from Springsted, the City's bond advisor, detailing the amount of the refunding and the anticipated savings. The total amount of principal proposed to be refunded is $18,965,000. If the interest rate environment of today held to the end of the month, the City would realize a future savings of $1,207,780 which would translate into a present value of $908,021. In response to Member Smith as to associated costs, Ms. Kathy Aho, Executive Vice President of Springsted, said the savings figure of $1,207,780 is net of all expenses. Total costs associated with the borrowing are estimated at $300,000, of which two- thirds would be underwriter's compensation, calculated as $10.00 per $1,000.00 to be established through the bid process. Additional expenses would be fees for: bond advisor, bond counsel, printing of official statement, establishment of escrow accounts, mathematical information relating to Federal Arbitrage requirements, verification of the sufficiency of the escrow accounts, and rating of the bonds. John Maloney, 4400 Curve Avenue, indicated that after attending the recent Truth in Taxation hearing he had acquired the 1991 Financial Report for the City and had concerns with the figures relating to the enterprise funds and also had questions concerning the four tax increment districts, in particular the Southeast Edina Tax Increment District. His concerns included: selection of the Southeast Edina area as a tax increment district, costs for land acquisition, site preparation and improvement, public utilities improvement and administrative costs for the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes projects. Because Mr. Maloney's comments did appear to pertain to the sale of the refunding bonds, Member Paulus called for point of order to allow a decision on the issue of sale of refunding bonds. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Maloney if he had any objections to the proposed sale which was the purpose of the hearing. Mr. Maloney responded that he felt the bond refunding was a good idea and have no objection. Mayor Richards then called for Council action on the proposed sale of refunding bonds. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAY INCREMENT RE MNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as follows:. Section 1. se.' It is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue its General obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (the Bonds), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to refund all or a portion of the City's (i) General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A of the City, initially dated as of August 1, 1986, (11) General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B, initially dated as of August 1, 1986, (iii) General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989, initially dated as of November 1, 1989, and (iv) General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1990A of the City, initially dated as of March 1, 1990. Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated, financial consultant to the City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for the sale of the Bonds, which is attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Terms of Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the sale thereof. Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisers, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9) is hereby authorized to solicit bids for the Bonds on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis. Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet at the City Hall on Tuesday, April 27, a993, at 5:00 o'clock P.M., for the purpose of considering bids for the purchase of the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City; provided that such bids may be considered at a later regular or special meeting of the City Council if the City Manager determines that market conditions are not favorable for the sale of the Bonds on such date. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Paulus informed Council she could not attend the meeting of April 27, 1993, at 5:00 P.M. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Belly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 31, 1993. and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $322,637.19; Cable $562.10; Working Capital Fund $3,046.37; Art Center $13,869.70; Pool $8,957.70; Golf Course $25,493.71; Arena $18,966.10; Gun Range $72.17; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $43,515.69; Utilities $261,559.77; Storm Sewer $842.54; Recycling $25.28; Liquor Dispensary $61,907.79; Construction Fund $1,518.12; TOTAL $762,974.23. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:05 P.M. City Clerk A. 4 , O REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: HRA From: GORDON HUGHES Date: APRIL 19, 1993 Subject: FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 5113 WEST 50th STREET CSM INVESTORS INC. Recommendation: Agenda Item # II.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize staff to prepare estimates and solicit bids for boulevard shade trees and public sidewalks on 50th Street and Arcadia Avenue. Info /Background I have participated in meetings with CSM Investors, Washburn - McReavy Funeral Homes, Regis Corporation and Peter Jarvis, with respect to the redevelopment at 50th Street /Vernon Avenue/ Arcadia Avenue. In my opinion, it would be appropriate for the HRA to participate in the installation of overstory trees and sidewalk on the public rights -of -way of Arcadia Avenue and 50th Street. My reasons for this recommendation are as follows: 1) It would be desirable to install larger shade trees on these boulevards than would be required by our zoning ordinance. It would be appropriate that the HRA finance costs associated with these larger size trees. (over)- Report /Recommendation /CSM Investors April 19, 1993 Page two 2) Boulevard treatments associated with this development may well establish a standard for other boulevards in the Grandview area. Therefore, our ability to upgrade the boulevard treatment in this area may pay dividends in other areas of Grandview. 3) Our participation with these boulevard treatments is similar to the HRA's participation at 50th & France. At this point, detailed estimates for this work have not been prepared. However, based upon bid prices from other City projects, we would expect the costs for overstory trees and the sidewalk to approximate $40,000.00. This estimate would not include the cost of work west of the railroad tracks. More detailed plans would be necessary prior to providing an estimate for this area. Staff would also recommend that the HRA consider extending public sidewalks and boulevard shade trees along Arcadia Avenue south to Eden Avenue. Staff will prepare estimates for this additional work for the HRA's consideration at a later meeting. o e� tit ,A • �N�bRPOM�e.� tl • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 19, 1993 Subject: P-93 -3, Final Development Plan approval 5113 West 50th Street. CSM Propeties Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # II. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ExI Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Following the March 15, 1993, Council meeting staff retained Peter Jarvis to review the proposals for this property as well as the plans for properties east of Arcadia. Mr. Jarvis' recommendations are attached under a separate cover. Attached to this cover is an alternative to the Jarvis Plan which is supported by the proponents of the redevelopment of the bowling alley. Representatives of Washburn- McReary funeral homes will be present at the Council meeting to discuss their plans in detail. .,1 P. E. Jarvis & Associates tel. (612) 831 -4157 fax. (612) 896 -1192 April 16, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Richards and members of the Edi; FROM: Peter E. Jarvis, AIC RE: Proposed Development T� vtpment in N.E. corner of the Grandview area. �� )) On Tuesday, March 23, 1993, I met with Ken Rosland, Gordon Hughes and Craig Larson and accepted their request to review two projects that are pending before the city -- each requiring different approvals: the Washburn McReavy rehab and the so called Blockbuster building and bowling alley rehab. This memorandum and one exhibit that I have prepared, along with a verbal presentation that I will make at your April 19 Council meeting constitutes my report and recommendations. Subsequent to this initial meeting, I met with staff and the aplicants three times and spent time in the "field" on three separate occasions. I will not detail all of the site planning and design recommendations in this memorandum since the integrated site plan at 1 "= 20' is quite readable -- I will, however highlight my main conclusions: 1. Land use: With respect to the various uses that are contemplated for the three structures, I certainly think that they are in keeping with the overall Grandview area. Moreover, the market has changed dramatically in the last five years and I think any major, high quality office project is simply not going to happen at this location in the foreseeable future. From a public policy standpoint you could "consider" these uses -- all one and two story structures -- as interim uses (such as the 'I" shaped retail structure that was constructed at the east end of the Galleria site in the lote 70's and demolished when the Galleria expanded to the east) but the reality is, I think, that these proposals, if approved, will cast a use and a "look" for at least the next 15 or 20 years. 2. Public rights -of -way: I recommend that the City maintain all of the Arcadia and 50th Street right -of -way. I see no benefit to the City by 3300 Edinborough Way Suite 201, Edina MN 55435 ,1 vacating these areas now. If anything, the City's future options are maintained. 3. Street alignment: I recommend that the street alignment remain essentially as is -- the street segments are too short to allow for any meaningful design changes. 4 Washburn McReavy site: The re -do in terms of exterior architecture will be a substantial improvement for the area. The recommendations per the site plan include the elimination of one curb cut on Arcadia and reconfiguration of the parking lots which, among other things, will provide space for much more landscaping. 5. Renovated "Bowling alley " building: Recommendations include the relocation of the easterly curb cut on 50th Street and a parking lot unit depth of 58 feet for 90° head in parking; and an increased parking lot set back along Arcadia and 50th Street. 6. Blockbuster building: I recommend "flipping" the building pad to the easterly portion of the site along with more of a rectangular shape which will better "fit" the site. The reasons for this are essentially: (a) Provides a building anchor at the intersection of Arcadia and Vernon -- somewhat more closely resembling the design condition on the east side of Arcadia. I believe this to be far preferable from an urban design standpoint than having a parking lot defining an intersection. (b) Minimize the impact of parking lots as one approaches the Arcadia area from the east. (c) Creates a logical entry point to the parking lot considerably west of the Arcadia/50th Street intersection. (d) Creates a backdrop for heavy landscaping along Arcadia which, together with the building, will screen the mortuary use from the glare of parking lot lights and retail signage that would face east. Further recommendations include extensive landscaping along the west edge of the revised parking lot screening the railroad gulch and somewhat reflecting the recommendations for the City owned property west of the tracks. I have re- designed the parking lot to provide at least a 12 feet wide area for landscaping north of 50th street. 7. Area west of the Rail Road tracks: The site plan depicts a reconfigured roadway defined by curb and gutter on the east and a flush 18" wide concrete band on the west side. Two exit lanes and one inbound lane are to line up with Interlachen. Finally -- the present parking (6 spaces) east of this roadway are eliminated. 8. Pedestrian circulation: Sidewalks are recommended as shown along with a possible sidewalk extension from the bus shelter west, along Vernon -- if the 4' wide concrete walk over the bridge is deemed safe for pedestrians. 9. Landscaping concept: I recommend the initiation of a traditional regular interval street tree (overstory shade tree) program along with a heavy emphasis on connifers along Vernon for parking lot screening purposes. Furthermore, the City might consider the preparation of a design plan for overall Grandview area that would address public rights -of -way in terms of plant material, lighting, sidewalks and bus shelters. 10. Parking: I believe the overall parking is more than adequate. S A Cn a.. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 19, 1993 Subject: S -93 -1, Preliminary Plat Approval for Zuppkewood 2nd Addition, 5316 Blake Road. Robert and Kurt Zuppke Agenda Item # II- B . Consent I❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Utility Connection Charges Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes and information. background LOCATION I *;i N[ROIO Y L w MAP I �0,- lim GROVE ma. SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -93 -1 LOCATION 5316 Blake Road REQUEST Create One New Buildable Lot EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 31, 1993 5 -93 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval Zuppkewood 2nd Addition, Lot 3, Lot 1, Zuppkewood. 5316 Blake Road The subject property is a developed single dwelling unit lot located west of Blake Road and south of Evanswood Lane. The property has an area of 58,756 square feet, with the orientation to Blake Road. An application to subdivide the property to create one new lot has been submitted. The two lots would have the following dimensions and areas. Width Depth Area Lot 1 119 feet 186 feet 22,084 square feet Lot 2 186 198 feet 36,672 square feet Lots within the surrounding 500 foot neighborhood have the following median dimensions and areas. Width Depth Area 119 feet 173 feet 20,840 square feet Both lots exceed all size requirements of the neighborhood. The new lot would be relatively flat with a slight grade from north to south. Development would cause only minor tree loss. Recommendation: Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Utility Connection Charges eR Q) B-93-1 Preliminary Plat Approval Zuppkewood 2nd Addition, Lot 3, Block 11 Zuppkewood. 5316 Blake Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed single dwelling unit lot located west of Blake Road and south of Evanswood Lane. The property has an area of 58,756 square feet, oriented to Blake Road. Mr. Larsen said an application to subdivide the property to create one new lot has been submitted. Mr. Larsen pointed out the two lots meet the dimensions and areas of the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Utility Connection Charges The proponent Mr. Robert Zuppke was present to respond to questions. A brief discussion ensued with the commission in, agreement that the lots meet and exceed all ordinance requirements noting the subdivision proposal does not require any variances. Commissioner Hale moved to recommend ..subdivision approval subject to staff conditions.. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. PROPOSED ZUPPKEWOOD 2ND ADDITION :t I t 1 4 l a I`,, (r 1rl p � � I 1 � 1•�ir- Lr : ^• rJ 5 Iris C 17 D I o� o �� d ` I 'r, u " N C v I i )11�Nr O W O OEA! eg l w•r n M rr. urns wp DI4, AaE G!•..[NT••• SQ 100 1 250 SCALE IN FEET r6ereF E D l sn p,rT_ L. O G IswtD,wal I ET4I\ A.u•60. 1� . y „ I vAC I I PE� H ¢Se1R•190 I o C, � L - 6WVEY r011• ROBERT ZUPPKE �. _ ��— �� r ' -1 I ]d/ Fj Ii•e« • I` S' PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6316 BW. 14.6. EEYU. H—Pn C—ly. hffi -- Y � � ��rc.: •j. 7 C': �, I�`Y M• ra''I I `~ DESCRIPTION:Irt.,mehw u.m p1 o , r, I •�• U F' I �' ; f >. rah :5 r \ la 3. Br4 1.2UPPKEW000. m—fto to er r•coraa o n ew•or •ne unou In N•m•ou Cam”. Oft y ( V NYw.ora. .umlrr d1EmRn1�_ \ r. �� jm I q I 1J We Ir .w orwr tn.t tN, r • w .ro wn.cr r.P ...nntw or • .war a ar aau arr. w ur rna .ew. a..neoe. E I'— �n� - -- ��•r O Y!of"b —Mn of Be O,AW Nwq Owsw WYvrIDr aKra.c —u. it wq. f..am wrM. r9fwo ..1 e!•s9's7',V •: i i D•ta oft Gtr e•r pt F.&—,. 1693. lt1 l44 -` 60 = J R «,..d WS IBM, day of Yrcr, 1997 • T tl Q •Ww.ou Manse No. 20201 NOTES: 1' I. iM oMnotbn r p•• a..r`9.rwwn b 0eeM m a.• norN tb• W lnt 3. Bloc. 1. ZUPPKEWOOD..A.cr r r.urwd to n••• • ee.M9 a E-t. M r 4u 2. AM of the .l•on 50.756.w. feet r 1.349 sr•.. e� 3. A=wdN to tM Cry r E4•r Nw pop•rIT r rand R.1 B4Ya•nd n "has the hftwbp .•ro.cr nob requirearati 9.5db9..la•e•: Prom . The •••r•p• eeta.c• of ..rtN9 lrorrw• on ft bloc•. f Rw - 20 feet E aw. - 10 fool ' 1 1.1 nwet•rw wnw. em feet width • 119 1.., _ d.otr - ITS wt w• - 24640.ttrw• Net SURVEYOR: MAN, u Nr FIELD 6r NOWAK. INC. OWNER: J.N. ZUPPKE 74 16; 6avd 6316 RIM. Rea -° Mkmmpo8•. NN 66426 Et1EU. MN 65436 fE.. «...r .I l... ! TELEPHONE 10121646 -6837 TELEPHONE 16121648.6837 NENNE /Ir c tl NOruNENTJ 2530 -II 4752 EGAN. FIELD & NOWAK INC. Y EaYZATA V IMAF� SURVEYORS (612) 346 -6837 1T 7 I I March 19, 1993 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION RE: Zuppkewood Addition, 5316 Blake Road Edina, MN This notice is being sent to all single family property owners within 500 feet of the property proposed for subdivision pursuant to city Ordinance No. 804. The property proposed for subdivision is located at 5316 Blake Rd., Edina, MN 55436. This property is legally described as Lot 3 Block 1 Zuppkewood The proposed subdivision consists of dividing the existing parcel into 2 Lots. The persons proposing this subdivision are Robert F. Zuppke 8870 Tellers Rd. Sw.,443 -2595 and Kurt E. Zuppke, 6925 Abbywood Ln.,443 -2270 (both reside in Chaska, MN 55318 ). The proposal will be considered by the Edina.Planning commission at its meeting time 7:30 p. m., March 31st in the Edina Citv Hall Council Chambers. 4801 West 50th Street. Information pertaining to the public hearing schedule and process is available from the City Planning Department at 927 -8861. Sincerely, Kurt Zuppke and Robert Zuppke Minnesota License No. 2028 2530-11 $310 0*0 Rood Edina, " 5506 jjj� J6121646-OW t a6i• y 9 � ff bt Minnesota License No. 2028 2530-11 $310 0*0 Rood Edina, " 5506 jjj� J6121646-OW A. o e �> O • ,N�RpflpNtitO • innu REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 19, 1993 Subject: Z -93 -2, Preliminar Rezoning PID, Planne Industrial District to.PCD -2, Planned Commercial and Amend ment to Comprehensiv_ Plan, Industiral to Commercial. Recommendation: Agenda Item # TT- c. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action The Planning Commission recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow Commercial Development. Info /Background: The Planning Commission considered this request at their March 31, 1993, meeting. At the request of staff the Commission limited their action to the proposed change in land use. Thus, there is a recommendation to change the land use designation. There is no recommendation on the zoning and traffic implications of the proposed development. There are a number of actions the Council could take on the proposal. 1. The Council could vote to deny the rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation it could refer. the Comprehensive Plan amendment back to the Planning Commission for public hearing. State statute requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission for all plan amendments. The Planning Commission ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow Commercial Development. Info /Background: The Planning Commission considered this request at their March 31, 1993, meeting. At the request of staff the Commission limited their action to the proposed change in land use. Thus, there is a recommendation to change the land use designation. There is no recommendation on the zoning and traffic implications of the proposed development. There are a number of actions the Council could take on the proposal. 1. The Council could vote to deny the rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation it could refer. the Comprehensive Plan amendment back to the Planning Commission for public hearing. State statute requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission for all plan amendments. The Planning Commission t is could then consider the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendments at the same time. 3. The Council could grant preliminary rezoning and order the Comprehensive Plan amendment hearing prior to Final Rezoning approval. This is a possibility even though the Planning Commission has not made a recommendation on the proposed rezoning. If the Council chooses option two or three, staff would recommend hiring BRW to review the traffic study submitted by the proponents. LOCATION MAP _ AL �� ■■ t ■� � ■■ �� - 111111 _ . � ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■■ �� ■: 111111: ■.. ,11 ■il'® ■■ / /�� 111111 = ■ w 4 REZONING OMP PLAN NUMBER Z -93 -3 AMENDMENT L O C A T 10 N South of Eden Avenue and west of right -of -way R E O U E S T PID, Planned Industrial to PCD -2 , Planned Commercial and Comprehensive Plan Amendment EDINA PLANNING DE-PARTM ENT DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 1993 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Lee Johnson, Helen McClelland, John Palmer, Geof Workinger, Robert Hale, Chuck Ingwalson Z -93 -3 Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Comprehensive Plan Change Plan Designation from - Industrial Amendment to Commercial Property Location: Approximately 8.2 acre site south of Eden Avenue and west of Right -of -Way Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting the subject property is zoned PID and is developed with a manufacturing facility (currently vacant) and warehouse facility. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing buildings with a 66,000 square foot Rainbow Foods store and a 4,800 square foot restaurant. The development would be supported by a 427 space parking lot. Mr. Larsen explained the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial for this site does not allow retail commercial development. Thus, the rezoning request is accompanied by a request to amend the plan. Mr. Larsen reminded the Planning Commission that they and the City Council considered amending the designation for the subject properties on several occasions since adopting the 1980 plan. Most recently, the area was reviewed by the Commission and Council in 1991 when it was decided to retain the industrial designation. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends denial of the proposed rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the development team were present to respond to questions. Mr. Watson, Watson Center, Inc., Dennis Crow, Rainbow Foods, Inc., Wally Case, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, Mr. Gorman, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc., and interested neighbors were present. Chairman G. Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the reasoning behind recommending denial of commercial on the south side of Eden Avenue. Mr. Larsen responded that it has been the opinion of the Council to thwart commercial from leap- frogging within the Grandview area. Commercial within this area has been contained north of Eden Avenue. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if any tax increment funds would be used for this proposal. Mr. Larsen said it is his understanding that no tax increment funds are being requested for this proposal. Commissioner Ingwalson said in reviewing the information he received regarding the proposal he noticed at one time this site was considered for a medium density apartment complex. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen what constitutes medium density. Mr. Larsen said our medium density classification is 30 units per acre. Expanding on this Mr. Larsen explained that that specific project was a four story 200+ unit complex. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen who owns the bus garage directly across from the subject site. Mr. Larsen said the Edina School District owns the bus garage. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if the school district wants to move the bus garage from the present site. Mr. Larsen said the school district has indicated they would like to have a new facility, at little or no cost to them, and have also indicated they are not anxious to leave the neighborhood. Commissioner McClelland referred back to the proposal on the apartment building and noted if she remembers correctly the apartment complex was internally directed into the site. Commissioner McClelland asked if the apartment complex proposal was heard by the council. Mr. Larsen responded that it was heard by the council but became "bogged down" due to the proponents requesting some involvement from the City. Commissioner Hale questioned Mr. Larsen if he views this as a "package proposal ", linking the proposed rezoning with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Hale also questioned if the fast food restaurant has to go along with the Rainbow proposal. Mr. Larsen said he is approaching this issue from the standpoint that the Comprehensive Plan should be amended first. If the Commission and Council decide that the Comprehensive Plan is to remain unchanged, reflecting industrial south of Eden Avenue, considering any commercial, whether it be a Rainbow store or fast -food restaurant proposal would be a mute point. Mr. Steve Watson began his presentation by informing the Commission that the development team has met with city staff, Council Members, and a number of residents within the area regarding this development. Mr. Watson acknowledged that this is a major step for the City of Edina and during discussions it became apparent that there are four major concerns regarding this proposal. The first concern expressed is traffic. It is the opinion of this development team if traffic does not function properly, the project will not work. Mr. Watson explained it is our belief that our traffic study indicates that this site is suited for a project such as a Rainbow Foods store. Secondly, land use. Mr. Watson stated in today's market the best use of land has become very important. Mr. Watson pointed out this site has been dormant for a number of years which may demonstrate that it may be time to reconsider the land use designation as portrayed in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Watson noted it is our belief that the Rainbow proposal will be a good use of the land. Third, economic viability. Mr. Watson reported that Rainbow -Foods has received numerous inquiries from Edina residents indicating they desire an different type of grocery store in their City. Mr. Watson reiterated that Rainbow Foods will add to the community as s -a tax base, as a service to-the residents of the entire city, and as an employer. The fourth concern expressed was government and city participation. Mr. Watson clarified that this project is not seeking city participation. Mr. Watson said he realizes this site falls into the tax increment district but stressed this project does not seek any form of city participation. Mr. Watson introduced Mr. Dennis Crow from Rainbow Foods. Mr. Crow informed the Commission that the concept for Rainbow Foods was developed approximately 10 years ago. In the beginning Rainbow was know as Applebaums. At present there are 27 Rainbow Food stores, and 17 stores are less than 10 years old. Continuing, Mr. Crow explained that Rainbow has experienced tremendous growth. Mr. Crow told the Commission Rainbow Stores were developed to compete with the warehouse /store concept. The proposed Rainbow Store for Edina will be a "flagship" upscale Rainbow containing a food court with seating, customer service counter, deli, and McGlynns Bakery. Mr.. Crow told Commission members that a market study was completed for the area and it found that 90% of the sales at the proposed Rainbow Store would come from Edina residents. Mr. Crow pointed out Edina has a population of almost 50,000 residents, and is served by four grocery stores. Three of these grocery stores are in east Edina, one in west. Mr. Crow noted many residents leave the City to grocery shop. Mr. Crow concluded that the subject site is centrally located, and will create lower grocery prices within the City. It will be good competition. Mr. Wally Case, informed Commission Members that his study of the subject site included the Grandview Area Development Plan, the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Land Use map, and Zoning map. Mr. Case pointed out the site is currently zoned PID, Planned Industrial District. With graphics Mr. Case pointed out that the site slopes from west to east, with very little trees, and vegetation. The Soo Line railway tracks run along the east side of the property and form a natural buffer. Mr. Case stated in his opinion the key question is, is this site suited for commercial use. Continuing, Mr. Case noted this site may be viewed as transitional. Mr. Case reported that the present market for office savl%AF and multi- housing is, and has been for some time soft. Mr. Case said his understanding of the Comprehensive Plan is that it is a "living document" and can be changed. Mr. Case pointed out, as mentioned earlier, residents of Edina have indicated they desire a store like this. Mr. Case concluded during the search for a site that could accommodate a Rainbow Store the subject site was found to be the best site available in Edina. Mr. Mike Gorman, traffic consultant, Barton - Aschman Associates explained to the Commission that their traffic study included, trip generations, trip distribution, traffic assignments, capacity analysis, and recommendations and conclusions. Mr. Gorman said they focused their study during peak hours. Mr. Gorman reported after all data was compiled the following recommendations have been suggested to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. 1) Eden Avenue should be striped to a three - lane section between Arcadia Avenue and Sherwood Road. This provides westbound left turns into the development. 2) An eastbound right -turn lane should be installed on Eden Avenue. 3) Adjust traffic signal timing at Vernon and Link to accommodate new traffic patterns. 4) Signs and markings at the western driveway into SuperAmerica on the north side of Link Road should be installed indicating "Do Not Block Driveway ". This will facilitate the westbound left turn into SuperAmerica and southbound movements out of. SuperAmerica onto eastbound Eden Avenue. A raised median should also be constructed prohibiting left -turn movements into or out of this driveway. This could require granting an easement to SuperAmerica allowing them to use driveway to east. Mr. Gorman concluded that the developer has agreed to make the proposed changes in cooperation with the City. Mr. Gorman pointed out that this project will also solve some nonconforming uses within this area. Commissioner Workinger questioned, the development team on the number of employees that would be hired by Rainbow to serve this facility. Mr. Crow said the proposed Rainbow Store will employ approximately 200 -250 persons. Commissioner Palmer questioned the term "leap- frogging ". Mr. Case responded that he believes that term has been applied because the City has indicated through the Comprehensive Plan that they want to contain commercial use, to one side of Eden Avenue. Continuing, Mr. Case said in his opinion the bus garage use is out of date when one considers the market analysis for the area. Mr.. Case pointed out if commercial would be allowed on both sides of Eden Avenue the surrounding properties would benefit from the proposed change, and the value of land would increase. Commissioner Palmer stated if he understands correctly allowing commercial on the south side of Eden would intensity the use of the site beyond what it is currently designated, but may be worth considering. Commissioner Palmer said he is unsure if this body should try to tie the bus garage across the street into any development south of Eden. �� U Commissioner Ingwalson questioned Mr. Larsen on what he views as the best land use for the bus garage site if the Lewis Engineering site secures a viable tenant. Mr. Larsen responded that commercial within the"Grandview area has always been focused along Vernon Avenue and the step to develop commercial along Eden Avenue requires amending the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Larsen said he cannot respond to the best land use for the bus garage until the Council indicates the land use designation for the site. Mr. Larsen concluded time may have to tell what will happen to the bus garage site. - Commissioner L. Johnson said -he is - -in a quandary regarding this proposal. He added he believes he cannot act on amending the Comprehensive Plan until he knows what is proposed for the site. Commissioner Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on what the process is if the Commission acts on amending the Plan. Mr. Larsen explained that this evening he is only asking the Commission to consider amending the Comprehensive Plan to include commercial south of Eden Avenue. Mr. Larsen said this amendment does not necessarily mean that a Rainbow Food store will be constructed on this site. Approval of the Plan would still require the proponents (or any proponent) to come before the Commission and Council for rezoning of the site. They then would still be required to go through the whole rezoning process. After consideration the Commission and Council may find that a Rainbow Food store is too intense south of Eden, but another form of commercial development may be considered positive. Commissioner L. Johnson said in a sense his approval is site specific. 'He indicated that he believes this proposal may work, but there are so many unidentified issues to consider. Commissioner Johnson said he would prefer to have more' input from staff, our engineering department, and city traffic consultants, etc. before making a decision. Commissioner Palmer said all we are required'to do, if I understand this correctly is to either recommend "no" to commercial south of Eden Avenue or recommend to the Council that we, as a body, think they should reconsider the land use designation of the site, and entertain the idea of redesignating the site as commercial. Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion what we are considering is a rezoning. If we recommend that commercial be allowed south of Eden Avenue, anything can go in there. Mr. J. Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail told members of the Commission he does not want the Comprehensive Plan amended. He stated he has a concern regarding traffic and lighting. Mr. Jack Abrahamson, 5209 Richwood Drive said he is opposed to the proposal. He added traffic will be too intense. Mr. Abrahamson-indicated he would like to see both the north and south sides of Eden Avenue developed jointly. DR-ICAF-i" Mr. H. Bastian, 5257 Richwood Drive informed the Commission he has lived in the area for 11 years, and there are at least 50 homes that will be impacted as a result of this development. Mr. Bastian said he does not want to see a fast food restaurant on this site, and he does not want to see a Rainbow Food store on this site. Ms. Pixie Cohen, 5213 Richwood Drive informed the Commission she wants to see this site developed, but wants the Commission and Council to carefully study any proposal and assess the impact it will have on the neighborhood, City, etc. Commissioner Ingwalson stated in his opinion, something has to be done on this site. He pointed out it has been vacant for a number of years, it is not attractive, and it is under utilized. Commissioner Ingwalson stated when one studies the market analysis for the whole metropolitan area one realizes that office space would not work here, the market is over saturated. Commissioner Ingwalson noted a commercial development or an apartment development may work well here, depending on the proposal. Commissioner Ingwalson said what the City needs for this site Is a developer with financial backing. Commissioner Ingwalson concluded as a Planning Commission do we just sit here and hope something good will happen on this site, or do we seriously consider this area, and try to create a viable development that is an asset to the neighborhood, and the community. Commissioner Johnson stated that he generally agrees with Commissioner Ingwalsons' comments but pointed out usually a site designation does not change unless it is site specific, tied to a proposal. Commissioner Johnson expressed he has concerns regarding this site, and wants some assurance that we will have more input on what will be developed on the site if the land use designation is changed. Commissioner McClelland pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan is reconsidered every 10 years, and so far the Council has not changed their position from the Industrial designation. Commissioner Palmer pointed out that when one considers the subject site it is a site that is in trouble, and has been inactive for a number of years. Commissioner McClelland pointed out even if the land use designation is changed the City will still. have to consider the bus garage on the north side of Eden Avenue. Commissioner Workinger stated in his opinion the City cannot hold any development hostage to the bus garage. As Mr. Larsen indicated previously the School District is anxious to see the bus garage renovated, but not at their expense. Commissioner Workinger reiterated do we as a body believe that commercial development south of Eden Avenue is a positive step for the City, and if we do, it is with the understanding that the Rainbow proposal would be required to come before us for rezoning approval. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend that the City Council consider amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect commercial use on the south side of Eden Avenue. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, Johnson, Palmer, Ingwalson, Workinger, Johnson. Nay, McClelland. Motion carried. Commissioner McClelland commented that her nay vote reflects the consistent stance the Council has taken regarding the Comprehensive Plan designation of the subject site, and the recommendation for denial by staff . raft. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 31, 1993 Z -93 -3 Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Comprehensive Plan Change Plan Designation from Industrial Amendment to Commercial Property Location: Approximately 8.2 acre site south of Eden Avenue and west of Right -of -Way The subject property is zoned PID and is developed with a manufacturing facility (currently vacant) and warehouse facility. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing buildings with a 66,000 square foot Rainbow Foods store and a 4,800 square foot restaurant. The development would be supported by a 427 space parking lot. In support of their proposal the developers have submitted preliminary development plans, written support of the request and traffic study. This report does, not address the zoning or traffic issues of the proposal. This report is limited to the Comprehensive Plan amendment requested. The current Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial for this site does not allow retail commercial development. Thus, the rezoning request is accompanied by a request to amend the plan. The Planning Commission and City Council have considered amending the designation for the subject properties on several occasions since ,adopting the 1980 plan. Most recently, the area was reviewed by the Commission and Council in 1991 when it was decided to retain the industrial designation. City Council minutes from that action are attached. Since adopting the plan there have been several actions and proposals considered which would have affected the use designation of this property. July 1984 Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan adopted March 1986 Land use alternative plan for Grandview Area presented to Council. Subject site illustrated as suitable for redevelopment for multi - family housing or office /office showroom (BRW plans attached) September 1986 .Council hears multi - family housing proposal for property. Proposal referred to staff, but never pursued further by developer July 1987 Council votes to accept multi - family housing as an acceptable reuse of the property May 1988 Planning Commission considers retail office redevelopment of this site and school bus garage north of Eden Avenue Proposal not considered by City Council September 1990 Council considers retail redevelopment of subject property and school garage property. No action taken August 1991 Council acts to leave- Industrial designation in place. Recommendation: Staff recommends denial- of the proposed rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff does not support amending the Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: Retail development should only be allowed south of Eden Avenue with a concurrent redevelopment of the north frontage of Eden Avenue (bus garage). The retail and office retail uses considered in 1988 and 1990 included redevelopment of the bus garage. The only reuse of the property, other than industrial, the City Council has supported is a multi - family residential use. • 8/19/91 178 presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 19, 1991, be and is hereby approved. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Paulus, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen recalled that the matter of amending the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan had been considered by the Council at its study session in March, 1991, and had been continued pending hearings relative to development at 44th and France. He explained that this is an attempt to revise the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan, developed in-the late 1970's and adopted in 1980, to make it consistent with the Redevelopment Plan adopted during establishment of tax increment financing districts. The-proposed amendments would affect parcels in three commercial areas: 1) 44th and.France, 2) Wooddale and Valley View Road, and 3) Grandview. No changes are required for the 70th and Cahill area. The tax increment districts for 44th and France and Valley View and Wooddale were decertified in June, 1991. This decertification does not affect the adopted Redevelopment Plan for each district. Tax increment districts remain in effect for Grandview, and 70th and Cahill. The Planning Commission recommended amending the land use map to make it consistent with the adopted Redevelopment Plan with two exceptions: 1. 44th and France, Area 1. The Planning Commission recommended that Area 1 remain designated as Single Family and not be changed to Low to Medium Density Residential as shown on the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Grandview, Area 4. The Planning Commission recommended that Area 4 remain designated as Industrial. The Planning Commission felt the strongest position to take at Grandview, given the variety of redevelopment proposals that have been considered, would be to leave it designated as Industrial. Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. No comment or objections were heard. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTED AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended within the Redevelopment Plan Areas at 44th & France Avenue, Wooddale and Valley View Road, and Grandview, to show the land uses as illustrated on the map for each of said areas attached to and made a part of these Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR STANDBY GENERATOR Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for one standby generator to recommended low bidder, Interstate Detroit Diesel, at $15,200.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes *BID AWARDED FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -295 BITUMINOUS OVERLY AT 50TH A FRANCE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Improvement BA -295, bituminous milling and overlay for 50th A France, to recommended low bidder, Hardrives, Inc., at $19,005.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. 462 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY'HALL JULY 13, 1987 Present were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. The Edina City Council held a Special Meeting on July 13, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Edine City Hall for the purpose of reviewing the Comprehensive Plan as to the,Land Use Element and the Housing Element. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW COMMENCED. Manager Rosland stated that, as directed by Council action taken June 1, 1987, Planner Larsen has prepared copies of the Land Use Element and the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan for the Council to review, together with a Residential Land Use Comparison of neighboring communities. He said the Comprehensive Plan is the key guide for staff when meeting with developers. Planner Larsen presented a map of the City of Edina showing the existing zoning of all properties, the 1980 Land Use Plan map and a map colored to show the existing undeveloped sites. He briefly explained the land use designation for the undeveloped parcels and commented on potential sites for redevelopment. Mr. Larsen also presented the general goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. Considerable discussion followed between the Council Members on the 1980 Land Use Plan as to what was projected in 1980 and whether or not the land use designations for undeveloped land should be changed in some areas. The Council then reviewed each undeveloped site as to the land use designation and made the following conclusions: Carl Hansen Property - Generally located West of Ridge Road and south of Interlachen Boulevard. Single Family Residential (R -1). designated. Conclusion: Appropriate Wallace_ Kenneth Property - Generally located at County Road 18 and 7th Street. Medium Density (PRD -3). Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Shepherd of the Hills Church Property - Generally located at County Road 18 and 7th Street. Mixed Use (Office or Multiple Family Residential). Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Property West of Londonderry Road Extended - Single Family Residential (R -1). Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Robert Hanson Property - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road. Recently rezoned to PRD -2 (Low Density Attached Residential). Conclusion: Appropriate as rezoned. Kunz Oil Service Station - Located at northwest corner of Vernon Avenue and Olinger Boulevard. Medium Density (PRD -3) . Conclusion: Referred to staff for additional information and alternatives for redevelopment. Hawkes Lake Proper - Generally located south of Vernon Avenue and East of Olinger Boulevard. Low Density Attached Residential (PRD -2). Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Kunz Oil Warehouse and Lewis En ineering Pro ert . - Generally located south of Eden Avenue and west of Railroad. Industrial. Conclusion: 411 for some type of multi - residential designation. Referred to staff for additional information and alternatives for redevelopment. Property South of West 49th Street East of Railroad - Mixed Use. Developed with two small apartment buildings. Not likely to redevelop. as designated. Conclusion: Appropriate Naas Property - Generally located north of Post Lane and south of McCauley Trail. Mixture of Low Density Attached Residential and Single Family. Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Naas Lakeside Property - Generally located south of McCauley Trail abutting Arrowhead Lake. Single Family Residential. Developed with one single family dwelling. Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Hume Property - Generally located at end of McCauley Trail and north of West Trail. Park /Public. Conclusion: Re- designate as Single Family Residential (R -1). Parcels on Cahill Road - Generally located on Cahill Road and south of West 70th Street. Zoned PRD -3 (Medium Density). Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. Parcel North of Crosstown Highway = Generally located north .of Crosstown Highway at Pedestrian Overpass. Single Family Residential. Conclusion: Appropriate as designated. o . fit TALT A4 1 Fl| ----'-- y • � � 1 w� � y ,/ 9� / • `• \— —~ — - ./� — •= •``��• ',rte .. , ��\� 3r,,y��r• � a�� s J rr� itV fh •�- I _. _._I —�� I � � �i I _ 9 E;� QUA• '� 8 — - - - -�' � ,� `'' ' !� I r � <�• �! ��\\114 IIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIInIIU � Lr__ —' — � ,� ��s; i; o A /� -- .41 It agN \ \ / � f \\ \\ .. � r. A.F At.. # y LI { p�T,.O. `, '•' ^�`J3, � L I I I I TT I I l� mTTrrnilrrrrrrTn�Tr�Nil��-�I�f� • 4 C I It Ile qu � 35'•"'i14 ro Ilk, T-f JTTTTI . ........ . . ....... •j = a � a^ d All Imn I IL CITY OF EDINA Application for: [ ] LOT DIVISION [ x ] REZONING - [ ] VARIANCE [ ] PLAT Proposed Name PLANNING DEPARTMENT Case Number ! ^. Date Fee Paid 4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET . EDINA_ '.'INNESOTA 55424 !61 2) 9278861 [ ] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [ ] FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN [ ] PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Name Watson Centers, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: (if Different from Above) Address Name Address 3033 Excelsior Blvd., Suite 420 Minneapolis, M14 55416 -4676 Phone ( 612 ) 920 -5034 See Attachment A Legal Description of Property See Attachment B Property Address See Attachment A Present Zoning PID Phone ( ) P. I . D . 4 See Attachment A Explanation of Request: Petition for rezoning from PID to PCD -2 and amendinq the Compre- hensive Plan Land Use Designation from industrial to commercial to allow the development of a 66,000 s.f. Rainbow Foods and a 4,800 s.f. Quick Service es auran wi rive -t roug . 1/85 (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: Name See Attachment C Phone ( ) SURVEYO Name See Attachment C Phone ( ) x Property Owner's Signature Appi ant's Signature Date Date 1/85 Gordon C. & Laverne S. Lewis c% Lewis Co. 4201 Norex Dr. Chaska, MN 55318 (612) 368 -3000 Gordon Lewis Gordon Lewis Gordon Lewis Kunz Oil Co. c/o Walter Kunz P.O. Box 24107 Minneapolis, MN 55424 (612) 920 -9373 Kunz Oil Co. Kunz Oil Co. ATTACHMENT A P.I.D. Number Property Address 28- 117 -21 -34 -0019 5229 Eden Ave. 28- 117 -21 -34 -0022 Unassigned (vacant) 28- 117 -21 -34 -0026 5209 Eden Ave. 28- 117 -21 -33 -0031 5233 Eden Ave. 28- 117 -21 -34 -0011 Unassigned (vacant) 28- 117 -21 -34 -0018 Unassigned (vacant) 28- 117 -21 -34 -0020 5200 Eden Circle ATTACHMENT B Kunz Property Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width being 8 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the West line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the South line of said Lot 8; thence west at right - angles to east line of premises first above described. That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of said Lot 1, thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said. Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest comer of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points: Point One located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet east of the west line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant south 259.4 feet from the Intersection of the center line of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and point two located on the south line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet east of the southwest comer of said Government Lot 8; said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the south line of said Government Lot 8; thence northerly along said drawn line 25 feet; thence easterly and at right angles a distance of 90 feet; thence southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet, thence westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. Lewis Property That part of Lot 1, Block 1, "Edenmoor, Hennepin County Minnesota ", lying North of the South 6 feet of said Lot 1. That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition. lying northerly of a line described as beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 1 distant 23.4 feet northerly from the southeast comer of said Lot 1; thence westerly parallel with the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence southerly parallel with said east line of Lot 1 a distance of 22.4 feet; thence westerly parallel with said south line of Lot 1 to the west line of said Lot 1 and there terminating. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117, Range 21, lying southerly of the southerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue and westerly of the westerly right -of -way line of the Soo Line Railroad Company, formerly the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway, which lies easterly of a line described as beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Government Lot 8 with the east line of Block 1, Wanner Addition: thence northerly and easterly along said east line to the most easterly line of said Block 1; thence northerly along said most easterly line and its northerly extension to a point of 25 feet northerly from the northeast comer of Lot 2, in said Block 1; thence westerly parallel with the northline of said Lot 2 to the east line of Lot 1, in said Block 1; thence northerly along said east line of Lot 1 and its northerly extension to said southerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue and there terminating. ATTACHMENT C Developer Watson Centers, Inc. 3033 Excelsior Blvd., Suite 420 Minneapolis, MN 55416 -4676 Phone: (612) 920 -5034 Rainbow Foods 1515 East Excelsior Blvd. Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: (612) 931 -1100 Planner Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. 300 First Avenue North, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 339 -3300 Traffic Engineer Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Thins Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, .MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group Phone: (612) 332 -042.1 Legal Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, and Kaufman, Ltd. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South 9th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: (612) 333 -4800 12 April 1993 To: Craig Larson, Edina City Planner Edina City Council From: Tom and Carole Kauf, Co- Presidents, Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association As the Edina residents most closely situated to the proposed Rainbow Foods development on the current Lewis Engineering site, we believe it important that the City Planner and Edina City Council take into account the following concerns of the 45 families who are members of the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association. 1. Traffic We are concerned about the increased traffic on Eden Avenue and Link Road which will result from the development. It is difficult for neighborhood residents to turn onto Link Road now, and access to Vernon Avenue is becoming increasingly unsafe. Current congestion is severe at times because of traffic turning into Amoco and SuperAmerica. (When activities are underway at Our Lady Of Grace Church, the situation is impossible.) A median on Link Road would help alleviate that problem, but any increase in traffic through the area is of grave concern. Furthermore, from the way the plan is drawn, it is not clear if access through our neighborhood will be precluded. We are adamantly opposed to any plan which would route traffic into the neighborhood circle. 2. Noise With increased traffic comes increased noise. We currently are hit with bus and automobile noise; the prospect of semi - trailer trucks and increased auto traffic is not very appealing, particularly when it will be a 24 hour issue. Grocery trucks unload late at night, and the current plan has the loading areas adjacent to the neighborhood, rather than next to the railroad tracks. It does not appear that the plan was drawn up with our Neighborhood in mind. 3. Lighting A twenty -four hour store needs around the clock lighting for its parking lot. As you are aware, our neighborhood is adjacent to the planned development, and a number of houses directly abut the Lewis Engineering site. We are concerned that this necessary lighting will seriously intrude upon the neighborhood. 4. Safety .Aside from our concerns about traffic safety, the issue of sidewalks surrounding the planned development has not been adequately addressed. Many people walk along Eden Avenue from our neighborhood; many others from around Edina walk and drive through the area to get to Our Lady of Grace Church. The plan must address this issue. These are just a few of our concerns. While we all wish to see appropriate development in Edina, we do not believe that the proposed Rainbow Development adequately addresses the potential impact the project may have on our residential neighborhood. At the very least, we would hope that all of these issues be completely addressed before the City Council and the Planning Commission take any further action. Please contact us if you require further information. SUPERAMERICA Mayor Frederick S. Richards Councilmembers City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55409 Honorable Mayor and City Council: AGENDA ITEM II.0 Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. 1240 West 98th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 612- 887 -6100 April 15, 1993 We have reviewed the development proposal by Watson Centers Inc., that includes a Rainbow Foods and a fast food restaurant southeast of the intersection of Eden Avenue and Sherwood Road. SuperAmerica is seriously concerned about the ramifications the proposed development would have on the access to our store located at 5205 Vernon Avenue. The traffic study (Study) prepared by Barton- Aschman indicates that the proposed development will generate over 4,000 daily trips. The peak traffic hours of this development is 4 -6PM on weekdays which is the same peak as SuperAmerica. Traffic exiting the proposed development and traveling westerly would stack up at the Vernon Avenue stop light beyond SA's driveway unto Link Road. The Study suggests that signs and markings on Link Road at the western driveway of SuperAmerica be installed indicating "Do Not Block Driveway ". We do not believe that signs and markings will insure the flow and safety of the turning movements to and from our store. The Study further states that a more positive control would be a raised median in Link Road to prohibit left hand turning movements to and from Link Road and SuperAmerica. A full median on Link Road would have severe detrimental effects on our business. The Study stated that a raised median on Link Road may require granting an easement to allow SuperAmerica to utilize the driveway on the abutting property to the east. Because of the severe change in grade between these properties and the fact that a retaining wall exists at the property line, this alternative is not feasible. SuperAmerica is pleased that the City is desirous of redeveloping this area. We would encourage the City to continue its efforts to do so but at a lower intensity use that would not create traffic blockage. Respectfully submitt d, VL Samuel S. VanTassel "' Real Estate Representative TO: City of Edina Planning Department RE: Case File Z -93 -2 Rezoning of 5229 Eden Ave. To whom it may concern: My husband and I live at 5048 Richmond Drive. We received the "Notice of Public Hearing" letter from you and we wish to make record of our concerns regarding this possible rezoning. We are in favor of a Rainbow Foods in this location and possibly a "fast food restaurant." But, we also have concerns regarding both items and have listed them below: 1.) Lighting - We do not want lights from the store shining onto our property. 2.) Noise - Will delivery hours be restricted to daytime thereby eliminating noise from trucks at'night. 3). Trespassing - We are concerned about people (mostly younger ones) going thru our property and OLG to "cut thru" to a fast food restaurant. This has been a minor problem to date but it would get much worse. Perhaps a very, very high fence could be put in, and maintained, to deter trespassers. 4.) Kids hanging out - Let's face it; not every parent knows where their child is. I assume this will not be a problem but we are more concerned about this issue if a fast food restaurant is put in. I would like a fast food restaurant but no hanging out! 5.) TRAFFIC - I would assume that traffic congestion is an area that is being looked into. The corners from Eden /Arcadia to -- Eden /Vernon can be very busy. Will there be more than one entrance into the parking lot? This traffico.area is a concern but of a greater concern is traffic on our street, Richmond Drive.- I, as well as others, over the years have complained about the traffic on Richmond Drive as it seems to have become a thorough- fare for people "cutting thru the neighborhood." As our street does not have a stop sign on it, cars have a tendency to "fly by" since they are not forced to stop anywhere from the Stop sign on W. 56th and Code as it curves around and becomes Richmond Dr. We have requested a sign but have been told that you just can't put one up for no reason at all! We have at least 15 young children under the age of 10 living on our block from the Frontage Rd to Richmond Circle. This does not count visiting grandchildren and friends coming over to play from blocks over. As much as we caution our children on playing and bike - riding, it's just like an accident waiting to happen. Children do not plan to get hurt but, as you well know, it only takes one mistake for a serious injury. This is of great concern to myself and my neighbors. If we cannot get a 4 -way stop sign at Richmond Dr. and Richmond Circle, we do not want this property rezoned. Period. With a grocery store and fast food restaurant, there is sure to be much more traffic on our street with people rushing to get over there. Thank you for asking for our input. Please contact us should you have any questions. �Zg rik Sincerely, l�. April 16, 1993 ENTERPRISES, INC. 5101 VERNON AVE. SO., EOINA, MINN. 55436 PHONE: [612] 929 -2685 FAX: (612] 929 -9261 The Honorable Frederick S. Richards, Mayor Members of the City Council -City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Re: Rainbow /Watson Development Proposal Dear Mayor Richards and Members of the City Council: This letter is submitted on behalf of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), the owner and operator of several businesses serving the residents and the City of Edina the largest of which include Jerry's Hardware, Edina Car Wash, Jerry's Foods, Jerry's Complete Printing and the 5101 Vernon Office Building. The purpose of this letter is to address for the record the following concerns relating to..the request -of Watson Construction and Rainbow .Foods for a Comprehensive'Plan Amendment- ,from- industrial to Commercial and rezoning from Planned Industrial to Planned Commercial to allow the development of a 66,000 square foot Rainbow Foods Store and a 4,800 square foot quick service restaurant with drive -thru (the Project). In the last five years, the Company has invested several million dollars in expanding and upgrading retail and office facilities. Following several years of careful planning and design, the Company is about to undertake a total make -over and remodel of existing food store. requi ring a multi-million dollar investment. Construction is expected to commence May 1993. The construction has been designed to allow the store to remain open to serve the community. Background The Project is proposed as a redevelopment of two industrial sites that are presently occupied.by Kunz Oil Company and Lewis Engineering Company (the Site). The Site was designated on the 1980 Edina Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Industrial.. The Site was designated in 1984 in the Grandview Redevelopment Plan for Multiple Residential Use. In July 1987, the City Council FOOD STORES SERVING THE TWIN CITIES AREA: Jerry's Foods • Jerry's Super Valu • Jerry's Newmarket JERRY'S FOODS OF SANIBEL: Sanibel, Florida MINNESOTA MEAT MASTERS: Annandale, Minnesota SAUSAGE DIVISION: Edina, Minnesota 4 The Honorable Frederick S. Richards, Mayor Members of the City Council April 16, 1993 Page 2 affirmed the Multi- ,famil`y Use-designation . for the Kunz /Lewis site. From 1988 through 1990, 'Jerry's Enterprises worked with the City in developing various redevelopment plans meeting the needs of the community and acceptable to the City. A plan for mixed commer cial use submitted by Opus Corporation and Jerry�s Enterprises came before the City Council in August 1990. Although not formally approved at that time, the City did require that redevelopment of the Kunz /Lewis site should include "a plan to redevelop and relocate the Edina School District bus facility as part of an overall redevelopment plan. The rationale at that time was that commercial `uses should not "leap frog" past the school district bus facility to the south side of Eden Avenue without first providing an orderly land use transition. Land Use The Edina Comprehensive Land Use Plan provides the following goals and policies addressing redevelopment. Goal: The goal of the land use element is to provide for the orderly and logical development and redevelopment of lands and waters, maintain an attractive living and working environment and provide and preserve the high quality residential character of Edina while responding to the changing needs of the population. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 17.) Policies: • Provide adequate buffers around commercial areas. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 21') • Pursue balanced land uses within commercial areas based upon functioning level'o'f the district. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 21.) • Encourage multiple institutional housing, especially elderly housing, on the periphery of commercial areas. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 21.) The Honorable Frederick S. Richards, Mayor Members of the City Council April 16, 1993 Page 3 ° Multiple residential development should be limited to low density attached and medium density residential in all areas except the Grandview area. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 22.) ° Encourage the intensification of residential uses in the Grandview area. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 23.) ° Encourage the re -use of obsolete or underutilized, commercial.and industrial properties for.multiple residential purposes. (Comprehensive Plan, Page 23.) While all parties can agree on the need to redevelop the Kunz /Lewis site, the key land use issue is one of compatibility with existing development patterns. The Kunz /Lewis site is bounded by church /institutional to the east, single - family residential to the south, office and multi - family to the west, and light industrial /retail to the north. The 24 -hour operation and.large parking area will splash off -site glare into the surrounding area. The existing retail complex to the north serves the general neighborhood of northwest Edina. The proposed high volume discount grocery operation will introduce a significant new traffic generator that will draw customers from a substantially broader area beyond the neighborhoods of northwest Edina. The addition of and the intensification of this use with its resulting broader -pull will change the character of the commercial services from one of neighborhood based to a more subregional use. Rainbow is not a neighborhood store. This neighborhood is served now,,:by a variety .of' 'commercial uses, including a supermarket, and there is clearly the potential for more commercial uses in''existing vacant spaces.. The Site °indeed can be redeveloped to serve the neighborhood and the community with uses other than the industrial, uses approved many years ago. The.impact upon existing businesses and residences would be more than just traffic related, though that is the major intrusion. The new identity the Project would bring to the area as a regional center and resulting peripheral commercial uses that often "follow" regional magnets like Rainbow, will not be The Honorable Frederick S. Richards, Mayor Members of the City Council April,,. 16, 1993 Page 4 conducive to the well- established residential character of this part of Edina. The Site is not AT the Highway 100 interchange, nor is it ON an arterial road. All the land uses between the interchange and the Site and along the non - arterial roads — leading to -the site--w-ill experience an identity change. The City has the resources to endorse and even pursue the options that are best suited for the neighborhood and for the City. The proposal by a developer to "build something" on the Property, which admittedly leaves a lot to be desired aesthetically and environmentally, should not subordinate other uses which, by their nature, require more time to be assembled and nurtured. Traffic Traffic Engineer�Glen Van Wormer of Short - Elliott- Hendrickson has reviewed the traffic analysis prepared by Barton - Aschman and identified several areas of concern ranging from the underlying assumptions to design issues. The Project will increase the traffic at Link Road by almost 50% at this critical intersection. The proposed Rainbow introduces a land use generating high volume and high velocity traffic that has peak use characteristics very similar to the retail to the north. The Project will create excessive "negative congestion" adversely affecting accessibility to businesses -- particularly in light of the peaking characteristics of the existing commercial uses. Conclusion The proposed Watson /Rainbow plan is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.. The proposal is not consistent with sound planning. The Project will put stress on the •transportation system far greater than the Edina Comprehensive Plan or Redevelopment Plan envisioned. The applicant has not demonstrated that the use is in the best interest of the neighborhood, or for the City.. The applicant has only demonstrated they believe there is a market for this proposal. The high intensity use would have multiple and extensive negative impacts upon the area which the developer does not address. The City has pursued and should continue pursuing other realistic,"compatible, and more complete redevelopment proposals which address the entire area. The Honorable Frederick S. Richards, Mayor Members of,the City Council April 16, 1993 Page 5 We respectfully request denial of.this, application in favor of a redevelopment scheme more appropriate to the neighborhood and the transportation network. r.. — Respectfully submitted, Robert N. Shadduck Executive Vice President Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. kw Enclosures cc: Craig Larsen, City Planner Marcella Daehn, City Clerk kw:JPOs t V-1) AS OO8 OL vaiv ow minE n N "' ,& O , N 2825 HA RRIEC AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNE OTA 4wi$ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY <- For KiEN t4wwry t r t P I rS 7 7 � .c� M, CRI&ED AS FOLLOWS# I:* ^La. I r WHICH is THE I,3T f EAST CORNER OF SAID OT ; THENCE MJN- NING L ,0144 THE We hireby certify that this is a true and cor'r'ect F�AsT Lsme the boundaries f LOT 1. A Of STANCE OF lard above described and FEET, THCNCI RUN if arty, thereon, NINA Nll if any, from or on said land. rn ' L. IN T NORTH of MAV 1965 OF AND PARALLEL TO °�. THE QT t4 L ` $AJo Loir 1, A 01446, THENCE FWNWING A.. ... ON A LiNE 'CET V WEBT OF ANO PARALLEL ; TO Tme EAST LINE sAio LoT 1. T - t 14T ON THC SOUTA LINE OF SAID LOT 1 ;' . TAENCE AUNNINQ EAST- ` t ERLY ALONG THE H 71 � L 1 4 c t TO THE 4 T' Cir M, I:* ^La. I d BLOCK WANNER We hireby certify that this is a true and cor'r'ect representation of a survey of the boundaries f the lard above described and of the location of all bu i l dl g if arty, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. fated this 44TH day of MAV 1965 EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK i Zevised 4h t.'v 13'-H r to 0 ..it91d. i i s G. Sur v yor°sw,. /' M, x �� ,.k _. � u.: � � Y,,. nom- �,.Y � ;.� �,� ,_�; a � �� , , � .., _. � . t , �, Y . >. 3' .,7. ..x r.. .. . � .r ....r , r .r �... �S. � ,.. �- Y.....r. ,. ., ... s w�. ;ii;:... w m� �. M.. .fix. � ....,.. � ..;�` U. , ,w .., , ... � �. -. ..Y � �...,.. , ' >. � �. xt x � w. � u. ,,. �... , N a � . s ,, s .: y �, x , � r k � x _. .. � � s x �. _ � _ � ,. a .� �, w s, � w x, ... w k x, t. x x � �� x r s �, �. ., w, K � w � w, �. ,� , � ,. ..,.. r -:.: s.. ,. . r � , .. Y. �,. , . .. ro.... , t +, . # . n.,. .... .... . ,... , ... . . . , ... .Y ... . ... . , z . . . .� . .. .... `.... ,. x e:. ... ,.. ,, , , , x , .... ,. ,_. ... ..... ,.., .. .. ,,. ,,. . .:. , _: ,� �. ,.. ,cc ,,:. ,. , ... .., x , . ....,. ,. .. ... ...Y .. .. �.. ., Y ,.� ....... w x r .... � ..w Y. £. _xi Y i .. t' <. ,,... �, .... � a= .. .,..... c ... ., ,... � ,,.. ., .. .. �, ... ,,... a ,. ., ".t .<.. .. �.,� ., xs. 'T d W+ ., .r. i... ,. .... .. ,. r ..... w... u.. ... , .... , i , ..... , ,.r ,�: . f.:r, .i Y ... .. s, ..if ,i:. x .,... "..t .., x , r.,.t, ...., r ..,...,.,,,. r. .w,.. Y' fro .,,.s .dH»n;= . „' ..v. , .. i` ,., x, ,. x ,.. . ,. .:,, ... . , .,.+ .. h , :+ ... �., ... �. x. ,. .a'�... �. x . ,x .... .. ,..,. ,... .. .. ... x ... '::. „r._... v.:..'z .. max.= . v. _ ... .., .., „ .. .... ..:.. .... .,. . ,, .. .:: ., z ::... Eu... � ..., r .. r .... ., :..x.,. v+. r r ... , .y., , , ,..� � ... � .,, ,..,.,., ,. ,. , , ., , ,�,s ...�., .,, S, ..,. ,, r , ... ,. ,.,...., z r .. rF... „'' r kr k 4 k 5 k) k wry, March 1993 gg r TRAFFIC IMPACT. STUDY in-a.inb.ow, 0 Foods Edina, Minnesota :,::.::::;t:::.. :....y.:,..v.:..: I MEN Prepared for -Watson Centers, Inc. Rainbow Foods 3033 Excelsior Boulevard, 1515 Excelsior Avenue East Minneapolis, MN.55416 Hopkins, MN 55343 Submitted by: Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary ................... ............................... i Introduction ......................... ............................... 1 Existing Conditions ................... ............................... 3 Trip Generation ...................... ............................... 7 Trip Distribution .................... ............................... 11 Capacity Analysis .................... ............................... 16 Recommendations ................... ............................... 19 Conclusions........................ ............................... 21 Appendix..................... ............................... Attached A Traffic Impact Analysis Using ITE Trip Generation Rates B Summary of Capacity Analysis C Traffic Count Data D Trip Generation Projections for Alternative Land Uses E ITE Trip Generation Rates F Rainbow Foods Customer Transaction Data G References H Planning Level Capacity Analysis of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Site Location Map ................ ............................... 2 2. Existing Site Conditions ............ ............................... 4 3. Daily Traffic Volumes ............. ............................... 5 4. Existing P.M. Peak -Hour Traffic Volumes ............................. 6 5. Proposed Site Plan ............... ............................... 8 6. P.M. Peak -Hour Directional Distribution .............................. 12 7. Site - Generated P.M. Peak -Hour Pass -By Trips ......................... 13 8. Site - Generated P.M. Peak -Hour New Trips ........................... 14 9. Post - Development P.M. Peak -Hour Traffic Forecasts .................... 15 10. Recommended Roadway Improvements .............................. 20 LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Actual Customer Transaction Summary ............................... 9 2. Trip Generation -- Weekday and Saturday ............................. 10 3. Trip Generation of Alternate Land Uses ............................. 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. has been retained by Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods to conduct a traffic impact study for a proposed retail development southeast of the intersection of Eden Avenue and Sherwood Road in Edina, Minnesota. The project consists of a 66,000 square -foot grocery store and 4,800 square -foot fast food restaurant. The development will generate approximately 7,360 trips per day with 500 trips occurring during the evening peak hour. The key intersections studied include Vernon Avenue and Link Road, Arcadia and Eden Avenues, and the two proposed site driveways on Eden Avenue. The analysis showed that the existing street system is functioning quite well, with above average levels of service. Modifications to the proposed site plan and surrounding street system were recommended as a result of the traffic impact analysis. They include: 1. Reconfigure pavement markings on Eden Avenue to provide three lanes with a center left -turn lane between Arcadia Avenue and Sherwood Road. 2. Construct an eastbound right -turn lane on Eden Avenue for the westernmost site driveway. Locate driveway directly across from the Edina Public Works building driveway. 3. Adjust traffic signal timing at Vernon Avenue and Link Road to accommodate new traffic patterns. 4. Signs and markings at the western driveway into SuperAmerica on the north side of Link Road should be installed, indicating "Do Not Block Driveway." This will facilitate the westbound left turn into SuperAmerica and southbound movements out of SuperAmerica onto eastbound Eden Avenue. The developer has agreed to change the site plan as recommended and will work with the responsible government agencies to accomplish the roadway improvements. With these modifications, the surrounding street system will continue to function well, and the impact of the proposed development will be minimal. INTRODUCTION Proposed Plan Watson Centers, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") and Rainbow Foods propose to develop an 8.2 -acre site located on Eden Avenue east of Sherwood Road in Edina, Minnesota. The site location map is shown on Figure 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Industrial District ( "PID") and includes one vacant office/ manufacturing and one occupied office /warehouse building. The Developer proposes a neighborhood shopping center to include a 66,000 square -foot Rainbow Foods grocery store and 4,800 square feet of fast food restaurant space. To provide for this development, the Developer will request that this property be rezoned to a Planned Commercial District ( "PCD "). Traffic Impact Study The Developer directed Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. to complete a traffic impact study for this proposal. The study takes a traditional approach toward the determination of the traffic impact of the proposed development. Specifically: 1. Analysis of existing conditions. 2. Trip generation of the proposed development. 3. Post - development forecasts of traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. 4. Capacity analysis at key driveways and intersections surrounding the site. To assist in the preparation of this study, Rainbow Foods provided weekly customer transaction counts for the following stores: Plymouth- Rockford Road Woodbury Richfield The stores selected represent Rainbow's newest stores with site and population factors similar to the Edina project. In addition, the projected sales volume of the Edina project is expected to mirror these stores. As part of the study, two previous traffic impact studies were examined. They are the Grandview Area Traffic Study, BRW, 1984, and the 1984 Grandview Area Traffic Study Update and Jerry's /Opus Traffic Impact Study, BRW, 1990. Information from these studies was used where appropriate to supplement information not otherwise available. O T. c C TII1M R21■ t 29 WS" LA. Sor •DE GROVE RD r RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis. MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group SITE LOCATION MAP Figure 1 s EXISTING CONDITIONS The area surrounding the proposed Rainbow Foods store is well served by the existing street system. The property is bounded on the north by Eden Avenue /Link Road, on the east by the Soo Line Railroad, and on the west by Sherwood Road. Major streets in the area are Vernon Avenue to the west and Interlachen Boulevard to the north. On the east, Trunk Highway 100 provides regional access with limited movement interchanges at Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. A description of the existing site conditions is shown in Figure 2. Traffic counts were taken at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Link Road on December 9, 1992, between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. In addition, a directional traffic count was taken for 24 hours between 3:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 8, and 3:00 P.M. on Wednesday, December 9. This information was used to determine existing traffic conditions and update information provided in earlier studies. Figure 3 provides an illustration of the average daily traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. All volumes except for Eden Avenue are from the 1991 Hennepin County Traffic Volume map. The count shown for Eden Avenue is from the recent 24 -hour traffic count conducted by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 4 is an illustration of the P.M. peak -hour traffic at the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection as well as the area on Eden Avenue directly in front of the proposed development. Overall, the existing street system appears to be functioning well. Observations in the morning and evening peak periods show that traffic is able to circulate within and around the area with little difficulty. This observation is verified later in the report as part of the intersection level of service and capacity analysis. The City of Edina and Minnesota Department of Transportation have indicated that there are no planned improvements to the street system surrounding the proposed development in the foreseeable future. Any improvements made would be to address specific safety or congestion problems. No projects of this type have been identified at this time. 3 ON AvE (CR 1C- � BERN (LC e TRAFFIC SIGNAL El SITE USE RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Figure 2 of yeti �O m�`o NON AvE (CR � vER LEGEND e TRAFFIC SIGNAL w SITE Q JERRY'S > © FOODS a W O U) Y cr CLINIC WASH EDH INA SCO �N • BUOLS S GARAGE ac n RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y 01 J'V�� 0 ov�C) 70-to DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Source: 1991 Hennepin County Traffic Flow Map Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S.. Suite 350 Minneapolis. MN 55401 Figure 3 Parsons Transportation Group LEGEND e TRAFFIC SIGNAL SITE co Paco � a CLINIC CAR aWASH EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE n u i LEWIS ENG. FJ 'b RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneopolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Figure 4 TRIP GENERATION The traffic generated by a particular development is a function of the size and type of land use developed. Once these two characteristics are known, trip generation rates are applied for the particular time period of concern. This development will have two land uses. The first is a 66,000 square -foot Rainbow Foods Grocery Store. The second is a 4,800 square -foot fast food restaurant. Figure 5 is an illustration of the proposed site plan. This study concentrates on the trip generation of the site during the period between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M. on a typical weekday. The total traffic generated for a typical weekday and Saturday are also presented for information purposes. The weekday evening peak hour period is analyzed in detail because this is the time when adjacent street traffic volumes are the greatest. A street system that can handle projected traffic volumes during this time period can typically handle traffic volumes during any time period. Trip generation data for this study has been obtained directly from Rainbow Foods for grocery store generated traffic and from ITE Trip Generation, a nationally recognized source, for the fast food restaurant generated traffic. In addition, an analysis based solely on ITE Trip Generation data has been included in Appendix A of this report. Rainbow Foods' customer transaction data was compiled from the actual hourly customer transactions recorded over an entire week during three separate weekly periods in September 1992, December 1992, and January 1993. The week in December prior to Christmas is one of the busiest grocery weeks during the year. It should be noted that the seasonal variations and holiday periods have little effect on the actual number of transactions. This is due to the fact that each store establishes a customer base and the store sales volume changes due to these customers increasing their average purchase per trip. In other words, the customer doesn't change their shopping pattern during a seasonal or holiday period, only their spending habit. Table 1 provides a summary of the customer transactions recorded at the three stores. The raw data is included in Appendix F of this report. Rainbow Foods' trip generation rates were obtained by averaging customer transactions from all three stores, relating them to trip generation estimates, and adjusting for differences in store size. It was assumed that each customer transaction resulted in two trips; one going to the store and one leaving. Any error in this assumption would result in the actual number of trips being less than estimated. This is true because each trip will involve at least one transaction. Multiple - person vehicles could have more than one transaction, which would lower the actual trip generation rate. It is unlikely there would be many trips to the grocery store which didn't result in at least one transaction. 7 Line a i 65, '00 mU2R RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA (8.21 AC) 357,530 5F BUILDING AREA COMMERCIAL 65,900 5F GFA RESTAURANT 4,800 SF GFA TOTAL BUILDING AREA 70,700 SF GFA FLOOR AREA RATO .20 FAR PARKING PROVIDED RAINBOW FOODS 347 SPACES RESTAURANT 80 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 427 SPACES OVERALL PARKING RATIO 6.04 /1000 SF PROPOSED SITE PLAN Figure 5 TABLE 1 ACTUAL CUSTOMER TRANSACTIONS SUMMARY Gross Average Average Average Average Saturday Saturday Average Average Average 1/4- 1/8/93 12/14 - 12/18/92 12/20 - 12/24/92 Weekday 12/19/92 1/9/93 Saturday Weekday Saturday Location Square Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Traffic Traffic Footage 4 -5:00 P.M. 4 -5:00 P.M. 4 -5:00 P.M. 4 -5:00 P.M. 3 -4:00 P.M. 4 -5:00 P.M. 3 -4:00 P.M. Rockford Rd, 65,650 132 120 130 127 160 180 170 Plymouth, MN Woodbury, MN 65,800 142 136 130 136 160 195 178 Richfield, MN 50,950 189 173 175 179 245 230 238 Average All 60,800 154 143 145 147 188 202 195 1,995 2,700 Stores Trip 308 286 290 294 376 404 390 3,990 5,400 Generation (assume two per transaction) Average Trip 5.07 4.70 4.77 4.84 6.18 6.64 6.41 65.6 88.8 Rate (trips per 1,000 sf) TABLE 2 PROPOSED RAINBOW FOODS-- EDINA, MN TRIP GENERATION -- WEEKDAY AND SATURDAY Average Weekday Weekday Trip ITE Size Trip Rate Generation Weekday Saturday Saturday Land Use Code 1000 s P.M. Peak Average Trip Daily P.M. Daily P.M. In /Out Trip Rate Generation Peak Peak Rainbow Foods 854 65.9 65.61 4.841 4,323 319 153/166 88.81 5,852 Grocery Store Fast Food Restaurant 834 4.8 632.12 36.52 3,034 175 91/84 686.02 3,293 w /Drive -Thru TOTAL 7,357 1 494 244/250 99.1 1 9,145 1 Source: Table 1 2 Source: 5th Edition, ITE Trip Generation The trip generation rates listed in Table 2 provide an estimate of the traffic that will be generated by the site. The "Weekday P.M. Peak In /Out" column summarizes the expected traffic into and out of the development during the evening rush hour. Note that it is expected that 244 trips will enter and 250 trips will exit the development during this critical time period. In many studies, it is considered desirable to provide an estimate of the amount of shared trips that would occur between related land uses. In this case, it is expected that there will be people who go to the grocery store that also patronize the fast food restaurant and vice versa. For this reason, it is considered acceptable to reduce the number of trips generated to reflect the fact that some trips are shared. However, in order to present a more conservative approach, we have not reduced the number of trips generated by a shared trip rate. This, in conjunction with earlier assumptions, further supports the expectation that the traffic projections in Table 1 are higher than what is actually anticipated. Trip generation projections for alternative land uses were determined for comparison purposes. The results of the calculations along with a brief discussion is provided in Appendix D. 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Traffic entering and exiting the site is distributed according to several factors. These factors include the location and size of surrounding land uses, existing street traffic patterns, the existing roadway system and traffic control devices, and the amount and location of competing developments. All were looked at in determining the directional orientation of the site - generated traffic exiting and entering the site. To assist in this analysis, the market share analysis prepared by Rainbow Foods for this site was used to determine the primary directions of approach of new trips to the site. The analysis takes into consideration competing developments, socioeconomic data, location, and number of households and potential sales within each area. With this information, the potential traffic from each sector is assigned to streets using the most logical choice for each area. Once completed, a reasonably accurate projection of the percent of approach on each of the major streets is determined. Figure 6 provides an illustration of the directional orientation of new trips for this development. In addition to new trips, there will also be pass -by trips that enter and exit the site. These trips are those that are on the surrounding street system and are visiting the site as part of another trip. For retail land uses, this represents between 40 and 60 percent of all traffic (see References in Appendix G). In this study, it was assumed that the number of pass -by trips was limited to 25 percent in an effort to remain conservative. This factor does not reduce the number of trips generated by the site. In fact, the actual driveway volumes (number of trips into and out of the site) remain the same. It does have an effect, however, on the directional distribution of these trips. Figures 7 and 8 show the site - generated traffic volumes for pass -by trips and new trips respectively. Note that in some cases the pass -by trips will result in an increase in certain turning movements and a decrease in others. This reflects the situation where a certain amount of traffic is being rerouted and not added to the surrounding street system with this development. New trips, however, are completely new to the surrounding street system and are added directly to the existing turning movements. Figure 9 shows the combined site - generated and existing traffic volumes at both Vernon Avenue and Link Road and the driveways into and out of the proposed development. These traffic volumes represent the post - development traffic volume forecast for the P.M. peak hour of a typical weekday. This information will be used in the Capacity Analysis portion of the report to determine where and if improvements to the roadway system are needed to accommodate the development traffic. 11 iii` 010 �rC,�j t �y 0 ` ( CR 158) �� NON AvE o C � aC � JERRY'S FOODS n CLINIC CAR a WASH EDINA SCHOOLS GARAGE a SUPER _(,,AMERICA O r O AMOCO Q� O� dl C1 RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA EDEN CIRCLE OFFICE E.:: W� AREH USE T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group 0� ml IN �m� 10% i Jar I I: P.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 J18 18) �18 4,2� �O �O C4 PET CLINIC CLASSIC HAIR DESIGN TSC OFF Q!l TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y CLINIC CAR Wo Cl I I EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE 4 SUPER AMERICA IPA o :�% Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group SITE GENERATED P.M. PEAK HOUR PASS -BY TRIPS Figure 7 w _Z J O V) 33 �y 3834 37 CLINIC CAR aWo 0 EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE , E01 IL--j 11--14 1 SUPER AMERICA 5g-' C. KED INA z <� , Co moo w PET y CLINIC S >IJAIR A SIC DESIGN TSC OFFICE e TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. . 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group rainbow ainb / 53 S� i SITE GENERATED P.M. PEAK HOUR NEW TRIPS Figure 8 z J • �8 �oo �o l CLINIC CAR Cl WAS H a EEJI I L--j SUPER �i,I, MERICA z� Z S 0 N� EDINA CLINIC �' c CLASSIC HAIR DESIGN TSC OFFICE Q� TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group 1=j EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE. Fu POST DEVELOPMENT P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FORECASTS ( Background Plus Site Traffic ) Figure 9 U-1 _Z J O O (n CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was conducted to determine the level of service rating of the driveways onto Eden Avenue from the development as well as the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection. The analysis was conducted for the existing condition as well as the post - development condition. Table 3 is a listing of the level of service, average delay, and queue length for each movement of each intersection under study. Note that the driveways from the development are only listed in the post - development case. This is due to the fact that there is little or no traffic being generated from this area currently. In addition, there is no acceptable method at this time for determining the average seconds of delay or queue length for traffic movements at unsignalized intersections. The procedures and methods recommended in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual were used to perform the capacity analysis. The relative congestion of an intersection and other highway facilities are usually expressed in terms of "level of service" (LOS). The LOS of an intersection is directly related to the amount of delay a person experiences as they enter and subsequently leave its area of influence. Level of service is normally expressed in the following terms: Level of Service A - -This represents the ideal situation for traffic flow delays averaging between 0 and 5 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service B - -At this point, traffic is less free flowing but the operation is still quite good with average delays between 5 and 15 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service C-- Traffic operations are still acceptable but delays are longer in the range of 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service D - -At this level, it is still likely each vehicle approaching a signalized intersection will proceed through during one green light. Average delays are in the 25 to 40 second range. Level of Service D is the current Metropolitan Council standard for design of permanent roadway improvements involving 20 -year traffic projections. Level of Service E -- Traffic will begin to break down at this level. It is less likely that a signalized intersection can process vehicles during one cycle and average delays are in the range of 40 to 60 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service F - -This represents a condition whereby traffic demand exceeds the roadway and intersection supply. Traffic must wait for many turns of a traffic signal to proceed through an intersection and the average delay exceeds 60 seconds per vehicle. 16 TABLE 3 CURRENT AND POST - DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Existing Conditions Post - Development Level of Average Queue Length Level of Average Queue Length Location Feet No. of Vehicles Feet No. of Vehicles Service Delay Service Delay Vernon Avenue and Link Road Eastbound Right B 14.9 36 2 B 14.1 35 2 Left B 14.9 36 2 B 14.1 35 2 Through B 14.9 36 2 B 14.1 35 2 Westbound Right C 15.4 81. 3 C 15.3 134 5 Left C 19.4 183 7 C 20.2 231 9 Through C 15.4 81 3 C 15.3 134 5 Southbound Right C 15.6 258 10 C 17.1 262 10 Left C 21.5 95 4 C 21.9 147 6 Through C 15.6 258 10 C 17.1 262 10 Northbound Right B 14.6 150 6 C 17.7 217 9 Left C 20.2 25 1 C 19.6 25 1. Through C 16.9 323 13 C 18.7 327 1 13 East Site Drive Northbound Right * * * A Northbound Left * * * C Westbound Left * * * A West Site Drive Northbound Right * * * A ' Northbound Left * * * D ' Westbound Left * * * A The data indicates that the existing P.M. peak -hour level of service at the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection is good, with an overall Level of Service of C and average vehicle delay of 16.7 seconds per vehicle. In the post - development scenario, the Level of Service of this intersection will remain C with an average vehicular delay of 18.2 seconds per vehicle. Both are indicative of an intersection that currently works well and will continue to work well if the shopping center is constructed. The same can be said of the two site drives. Both show a Level of Service A for the northbound right turns and westbound left turns. The northbound left turn at the west driveway is Level of Service D. This is considered acceptable for a non - signalized intersection. Traffic experiencing this level of service will not affect public street operations. Also shown in Table 3, is the expected queue lengths for the existing and post - development conditions at Vernon Avenue and Link Road. Some increase in backup is expected over the existing condition. Most notably, the westbound left turn movement and the southbound left turn movement. Potentially, the most critical is the westbound through and left -turn storage requirements. At 130 and 230 feet respectively, backups will extend beyond the driveway into the SuperAmerica service station. The proposed development will result in two additional vehicles stacking in the left -turn lane and the through /right -turn lane during each signal cycle in the evening peak period. The backup condition currently exists during peak periods without the development, however. Some improvement may be obtained through better signage, etc. A complete analysis of the proposed development using ITE trip generation factors with a 25 percent pass -by trip rate is presented in Appendix A of this report. Using these figures only slightly increases overall delay at Vernon Avenue and Link Road to 18.4 seconds per vehicle. The Level of Service is C and the critical queue lengths are only slightly increased. Two other intersections will be impacted by this development that are not shown in Table 3. They are the intersection of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue and the intersection of Vernon Avenue and the southbound TH 100 off -ramp. The trip distribution and assignment analysis indicates that each will experience an increase in traffic of approximately 232 vehicles and 26 vehicles respectively during the evening peak hour. Background traffic counts were not taken at either intersection due to their distance from the site. A planning level analysis using traffic counts from previous studies indicates that the level of service at both intersections will remain acceptable. Notes from the analysis are provided in Appendix H of this report. 18 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development: 1. Eden Avenue should be striped to a three -lane section between Arcadia Avenue and Sherwood Road to provide for westbound left turns into the development. 2. An eastbound right -turn lane should be installed on Eden Avenue for the westernmost driveway. 3. Adjust traffic signal timing at Vernon Avenue and Link Road to accommodate new traffic patterns. 4. Signs and markings at the western driveway into SuperAmerica on the north side of Link Road should be installed, indicating 'Do Not Block Driveway." This will facilitate the westbound left turn into SuperAmerica and southbound movements out of SuperAmerica onto eastbound Eden Avenue. If more positive control is desired, a raised median should be constructed prohibiting left -turn movements into or out of this driveway. This may require granting an easement to SuperAmerica allowing them to use driveway to east. Figure 10 provides an illustration of the recommended improvements. The recommendations should adequately address the traffic impacts caused by the proposed development. If implemented, the surrounding street system should continue to operate at an acceptable level of service and no further modifications will be needed. W 11JO / CLINIC Cl CAR WASH U SUPER MERICA Q� AMOCO O� 0: Z QLO Qf LO <0 EDINA '� w� PET CLINIC y CLASSIC HAIR DESIGN RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group LEGEND B TRAFFIC SIGNAL EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE J RESTRIPE EDEN AVE. TO 3 LANES RIGHT TURN LANE rainbow I RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Figure 10 LJ _Z J 0 0 CONCLUSIONS The following statements summarize the conclusions of this report: 1. The existing street system surrounding the proposed development functions at an acceptable level of service. 2. Actual customer transaction counts at similar Rainbow Foods stores indicate the proposed development will generate approximately 7,360 trips per weekday with 500 occurring during the evening peak hour. Approximately 250 of these will be entering the site and 250 will be exiting the site during the evening peak hour. Of these trips, it is conservatively estimated that 75 percent or 5,520 will be new with the remainder being "pass -by" trips. 3. The proposed development traffic operations along Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue will remain at acceptable levels. Additional traffic backups will be min. al and should be able to be addressed through better signage and /or channelization at the driveway into SuperAmerica. 4. The two site driveways onto Eden Avenue will function well with the northbound left turns at the west and east operating at Level of Service C and D, respectively. 5. An analysis of the proposed site using ITE trip generation rates for both the grocery store and fast food restaurant results in little difference compared to the rates developed using actual customer transactions. The projected level of service at key intersections remains at a Level of Service C or better with the exception of the northbound left turns from the parking lot onto Eden Avenue. The movements are projected to be Level of Service D for the east driveway and E for the west driveway. This is considered acceptable for peak periods, especially since all delays and potential backups will occur in the parking lot rather than in the public street. 21 APPENDIX A Traffic Impact Analysis Using ITE Trip Generation Rates TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS USING ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES The trip generation projections prepared for this report used data received from Rainbow Foods showing actual customer transactions at three stores within the metropolitan area that will be similar to the proposed store in Edina. The projections and subsequent analysis indicated that the grocery store and restaurant will not significantly affect traffic operations on the surrounding street system. To verify this conclusion, it was decided to conduct a similar analysis using ITE trip generation rates for the grocery store. ITE rates were already used for the fast food restaurant. The resulting trip generation data is summarized in Table 1A. TABLE 1A PROPOSED RAINBOW FOODS-- EDINA, MN TRIP GENERATION -- WEEKDAY - -ITE TRIP GENERATION Average Weekday Weekday Trip Weekday Land Use ITE Size Trip Rate Generation P.M. Peak Daily P.M. Peak Daily P.M. Peak Code (1,000 sf) In/ Out Rainbow Foods 854 65.9 125.5' 9.76' 8,270 643 308/335 Grocery Store Fast Food Restaurant 834 4.8 632.12 36.52 3,034 175 91/84 w /Drive -Thru TOTAL 111,3041 818 1 399/419 ' Source: 4th Edition, ITE Trip Generation 2 Source: 5th Edition, ITE Trip Generation The trip generation figure shown in Table 1A were distributed and assigned to background traffic on Eden Avenue, Vernon Avenue, and Arcadia Avenue in a manner similar to that conducted for the analysis using Rainbow Foods transaction data. The forecasted traffic volumes for the Eden Avenue /Vernon Avenue intersection as well as the two site driveways are shown on Figure 1A. Table 2A provides a breakdown of the expected level of service and queuing characteristics for each movement using the revised data. The level of service for all movements remain in acceptable ranges. The intersection of Vernon Road and Link Road will continue to operate at LOS C with some increase in A -1 re. y �r lO AMOCO i DO �O C4 PETA CLINIC CAARSSIC i DESIGN TSC -� OFF Q� TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAINBOW FOODS EDINA, MINNESOTA T R A F F I C S T U D Y CLINIC CAR C3Wo 0 Cc]] Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. ■ 111 Third Ave. S., Suite 350 Minneopolis, MN 55401 Parsons Transportation Group SUPER MERICA xv) no W� !=:=j EDINA SCHOOLS BUS GARAGE POST DEVELOPMENT P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FORECASTS l Background Plus Site Traffic Using ITE Rates I Figure 1A U-1 _Z J O O Cn TABLE 2A CURRENT AND POST - DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (ITE ANALYSIS) Existing Conditions Post - Development Level of Average Queue Length Level of Average Queue Length Location Feet No. of Vehicles Feet No. of Vehicles Service Delay Service Delay Vernon Avenue and Link Road Eastbound Right B 14.9 36 2 B 13.8 35 2 Left B 14.9 36 2 B 13.8 35 2 Through B 14.9 36 2 B 13.8 35 2 Westbound Right C 15.4 • 81 3 C 21.1 170 7 Left C 19.4 183 7 C 15.7 265 11 Through C 15.4 81 3 C 21.1 170 7 Southbound Right C 15.6 258 10 C 17.6 260 10 Left C 21.5 95 4 C 22.5 182 7 Through C 15.6 258 10 C 17.6 260 10 Northbound Right B 14.6 150 6 C 20.0 251 10 Left C 20.2 25 1 C 19.5 25 1 Through C 16.9 323 13 C 19.2 324 1 13 East Site Drive Northbound Right * * * A Northbound Left * * * D Westbound Left * * * A West Site Drive Northbound Right * * * A Northbound Left * * * E Westbound Left * * * A overall delay. Northbound left turns from the two site driveways would experience levels of service in the D to E range, but all backup will occur on private property. The actual levels of service will probably be better due to platooning of traffic from the traffic signal at Vernon Avenue and Link Road. Based on the above, it is concluded that the surrounding street system will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service regardless of whether or not Rainbow customer transaction data or ITE data is used in the trip generation forecasts. The recommended street improvements described in the report should be pursued regardless of the analysis method chosen. A -3 APPENDIX B Summary of Capacity Analysis Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 c Intersection at Vernon and Link 11:19:57 `- PM Peak Hour existing volumes SIG4A1B5/TEAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation .50 Vehicular Delay 16.7 Level of Service C+ Sequence 41 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * + + ^ * ++ HH *> <+ + <+++I- v A * * ** ^ +++F v + * + +++i + * + v G /C= .231 G/C== .340 G /C= .295 G= 20.8 " G= 30.6 " G= 26.6 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " r C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Peck .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ G/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Maxim= Group Lanes Reqd Used C (vph) E Volume Delay S Queue N Approach 16.4 C+ TH +RT 24/2 .22 .34 1106 1209 620 15.6 C+ 258 ft LT 12/1 .17 .23 229 390 98 21.5 *C 95 ft S Approach 16.4 C+ RT 12/1 .19 .34 422 501 180 14.6 B 150 ft TH 24/2 .26 .34 1109 1213 774 16.9 *C+ 323 ft IT 12/1 .15 .23 229 390 2 20.2 C 25 ft E Approach 18.5 C+ TH +RT 12/1 .13 .30 354 441 91 15.4 C+ 81 ft IT 12/1 .22 .30 336 471 206 19.9 *C+ 183 ft W Approach 14.9 B LT+ZH +RT 12/1 .09 .30 326 410 41 14.9 B 36 ft Rainbow Edina Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour existing volumes SIGNAIB5/TEAPAC - Evaluation of Intersection Perfornwnoe Sequence 41 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * + + ^ * + + +++F RT TH LT 11 v A * * ** 85 ^ ++++ v <+ * +> 1 2 > + * + +++1 + *+ v G /C= .231 G/C--- .340 G/C* .295 G= 20.8 " G= 30.6 " G= 26.6 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " 03/02/93 11:20:03 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units Voles: vph Wid/In:ft /# G/C Rqd @C:% G/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:IAS Deg Sat:V /C Avg Del:sec Tot Del: min # Stop: vph Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units Volume: vph Svc Lvl:IAS Deg Sat:V /C Avg Del: sec Tat Del: min # Stop: vph Max Que:veh Max Que: ft N Approach E Approach S Approach RT TH IT RT TH LT RT TH LT 11 608 97 85 5 205 179 774 2 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 24/2 12/1 0 22 17 0 13 22 19 26 15 0 34 23 0 30 30 34 34 23 0 1209 390 0 441 471 501 1213 390 C+ C C+ C+ B C+ C .00 .51 .25 .00 .21 .44 .36 .64 .00 .0 24.5 29.4 .0 24.7 27.5 23.9 26.1 26.7 0 253 48 0 37 95 72 337 1 0 496 80 0 68 167 135 652 2 0 20 4 0 3 7 6 26 0 0 259 95 0 81 184 150 323 25 N Approach E Approach S Approach 716 295 955 C+ .37 26.8 132 235 C+ .48 25.2 301 576 24 259 10 184 C+ .59 25.7 410 789 32 323 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 12 9 18 2005 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 9 0 0 30 0 0 410 0 5025 Int. W Approach Total 39 2005 B B .10 C+ .00 .10 .00 .51 .0 23.5 .0 25.7 0 16 0 859 0 30 0 1630 0 1 0 67 0 37 0 323 Int. W Approach Total 39 2005 B C+ .10 .51 24.7 25.7 16 859 30 1630 1 67 37 323 V - Rainbow Edina Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour existing volumes SIGNA185/IEAPAC - Display of Intersection Parameters 03/02/93 11:20:08 Display of: VOIUMESS 10 548 88 WIDTHS 0 24 12 LANES 0 2 1 - ---- -- \ 77 0 0 -- 5 12 1 ^ 17 0 0 / + / 185 12 1 North 9 12 1 -- 11 0 0 \ 2 697 162 Phasing: SEQUENCE 41 12 24 12 PRM N N N N 1 2 1 IDIG ID LD Rainbow Edina Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour w /post - development volumes SIGML85/TEAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation .56 Vehicular Delay 18.2 Sequence 41 C+ RT 12/1 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * + + IT 12/1 ^ * + + +++t *> <+ + <++++ v A * * ** ^ i i-i i v <+ * +> +++F> + * + ++++ + *+ v 03/02/93 11:18:27 Level of Service C+ G /C= .243 G /C= .308 G /C= .316 G= 21.8 " G= 27.7 " G= 28.4 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ G/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Maximum Group Lanes Reqd Used C (vph) E Volume Delay S Queue N Approach 18.1 C+ TH+RT 24/2 .21 .31 977 1094 600 17.1 C+ 262 ft LT 12/1 .20 .24 253 411 154 21.9 *C 147 ft S Approach 18.4 C+ RT 12/1 .23 .31 370 454 248 17.7 C+ 217 ft TH 24/2 .25 .31 981 1098 748 18.7 *C+ 327 ft IT 12/1 .15 .24 253 411 2 19.6 C+ 25 ft E Approach 18.4 C+ TH +RT 12/1 .17 .32 386 469 156 15.3 C+ 134 ft LT 12/1 .26 .32 371 499 268 20.2 *C 231 ft W Approach 14.1 B LT+TH +RT 12/1 .11 .32 322 400 41 14.1 B 35 ft f t Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 Intersection at Vernon and Link 11:18:33 PM Peak Hour w /post - develop T ent volumes SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sequence 41 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * + + ^ * + + 2 v A * * ** ^ + HH v <+ * +> + * + + * + v G/C-- .243 G/C--- .308 G/C--- .316 G== 21.8 " G= 27.7 " G= 28.4 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 " C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec MVMr TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH IT RT TH IT RT TH IT RT TH LT Total Volume: vph 11 588 154 149 5 267 247 747 2 12 9 18 2209 Wid/Ln:ft /# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 G/C Rqd @C:% 0 21 20 0 17 26 23 25 15 0 11 0 G/C Used: % 0 31 24 0 32 32 31 31 24 0 32 0 SV @E: vph 0 1094 411 0 469 499 454 1098 411 0 400 0 4836 Svc Lvl:IAS C+ C C+ C C+ C+ C+ B C+ Deg Sat:V /C .00 .55 .38 .00 .33 .54 .55 .68 .00 .00 .10 .00 .56 Avg Del:sec .0 26.8 30.0 .0 25.0 27.8 28.7 28.7 25.9 .0 22.3 .0 27.9 Tot Del:min 0 268 77 0 65 124 118 357 1 0 15 0 1025 # Stop: vph 0 500 128 0 119 221 206 655 2 0 29 0 1860 Max Que:veh 0 21 6 0 5 9 9 26 0 0 1 0 77 Max Que: ft 0 263 148 0 135 232 217 327 25 0 35 0 327 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total Volume: vph 753 421 996 39 2209 Svc Lvl:IDS C+ C+ C+ B C+ Deg Sat:V /C .51 .47 .65 .11 .56 Avg Del:sec 27.5 27.0 28.8 23.4 27.9 Tot Del:min 345 189 476 15 1025 # Stop: vph 628 340 863 29 1860 Max Que:veh 27 14 35 1 77 Max Que: ft 263 232 327 35 327 Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 Intersection at Vernon and Link 11:18:38 �- PM Peak Hour w /post- developnent volumes SIGNAIBS/TEAPAC - Display of Intersection Parameters I Display of: VOILMS 10 530 139 WIDS 0 24 12 LVES 0 2 1 \ 135 0 0 — 5 12 1 ^ 17 0 0 / + / 241 12 1 North 9 12 1 — 11 0 0 \ 2 673 223 Phasing: SEQUENCE 41 12 24 12 PRM N N N N 1 2 1 IDIG ID LD I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -1 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... AREAPOPULATION ...................... NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET....... NAMEOF THE ANALYST .................. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd /yy) ...... TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - developmen INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST /WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN 30 1 150000 Eden Site #1 MJB 03 -02 -1993 PM Peak Hour t Volumes TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- EB WB NB SB - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- LEFT 0 65 100 -- THRU 297 281 0 -- RIGHT 102 0 66 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- EB WB NB SB - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- LANES 2 2 2 -- ADJUSTMENT �.- --------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTORS 0 0 Page-2 WESTBOUND PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE NORTHBOUND GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS - - - - -- FOR RIGHT TURNS --------------- -- EASTBOUND - - - - - -- 0.00 ---- - - - - -- 90 ---------- 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND - - - -- --- - -- - VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------- -------- - - - - -- - - - - -- % SU TRUCKS $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES $ MOTORCYCLES ----- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND - -- - -- --- CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE -- - - - - -- ADJUSTMENT ----- - - - - -- CRITICAL GAP ------ - - - - -- MINOR RIGHTS -------- - - - - -- NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.... Site #1 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development Volumes F CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF- SERVICE Page -3 --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 72 701 701 701 629 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.... Site #1 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development Volumes POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS - - - - - -- p -- - - - - -- M --- - - - - -- SH ------ - - - - -- R SH ------ - - - - -- - -- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 110 321 301 301 191 D RIGHT 73 891 891 891 818 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 72 701 701 701 629 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.... Site #1 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development Volumes 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -1 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... AREA POPULATION ...................... NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET....... NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm /dd /yy) ...... TIMEPERIOD ANALYZED ................. OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - developmen INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST /WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN 30 1 150000 Eden Site #2 MJB 03 -02 -1993 PM Peak Hour t Volumes TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- EB WB NB SB - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- LEFT 0 57 23 -- THRU 369 259 0 -- RIGHT 20 0 60 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- EB WB NB SB - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- LANES 2 2 2 -- ADJUSTMENT ` --------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTORS 0 0 Page -2 WESTBOUND PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE NORTHBOUND GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS - - - - -- FOR RIGHT TURNS --------------- -- EASTBOUND - - - - - -- 0.00 ---- - - - - -- 90 ---------- 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND - - - -- --- --- - VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- % SU TRUCKS $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND - -- - -- --- CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) -------- - - - - -- VALUE -- - - - - -- ADJUSTMENT ----- - - - - -- CRITICAL GAP ------ - - - - -- MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.... Site #2 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development Volumes CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF- SERVICE Page -3 --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- - -- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 25 320 303 303 278 C RIGHT 66 896 896 896 830 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 63 710 710 710 647 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.... Site #2 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development Volumes Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour 13:25:21 �- Post - development volumes using ITE dis. supermarket rate I *C 1 257 ft I SIGNAL85/ EAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary .25 1 .30 1 939 1 1061 I 731 1 19.2 Intersection Averages: M 1 12/1 I Degree of Saturation .59 Vehicular Delay 19.0 Level of Service C+ Sequence 41 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I * + + ^ I * I ++ I iI 1 *> 1<+ + I <-H f 1 1 I 1 v I * * * *I A +++ V <+ + * >�++++> I + I +* I I i + I +* I v 1 1 G /C= .246 1 G /C= .298 1 G /C= .323 I G= 22.1 " I G= 26.8 " I G= 29.1 " I 1 Y= 4.0 " 1 Y= 4.0 " I Y= 4.0 " I C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Peck .0 sec = .0% 1 Lane IWidth/1 G/C I Service Ratel Adj I HCM I L I Maximuml I pup I Lanes I Regd Used I C (vph) E I Volume I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 18.8 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 1 .21 1 .30'1 936 1 1058 1 587 1 17.6 1 C +I 260 ft I I IT 1 12/1 1 .21 1 .25 1 260 1 417 1 191 1 22.5 I *C 1 182 ft I S Approach 19.4 C+ RT 1 12/1 1 .26 1 .30 1 353 1 439 I 290 1 20.0 I *C 1 257 ft I TH 1 24/2 I .25 1 .30 1 939 1 1061 I 731 1 19.2 1 C +1 324 ft I M 1 12/1 I .15 1 .25 1 260 I 417 1 2 1 19.5 1 C+1 25 ft I E Approach 19.0 C+ I TH+RT1 12/1 1 .20 1 .32 1 397 1 479 1 199 1 15.7 1 C+1 170 ft I I IT 1 12/1 1 .28 1 .32 1 383 1 509 1 310 1 21.1 I *C 1 265 ft I W Approach 13.8 B ILT+Tli +RT1 12/1 1 1 .32 1 307 1 381 1 41 1 13.8 1 B 1 35 ft I Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour 13:25:29 Post - development volumes using ITE dis. supermarket rate SIGNA185/TEAPAC - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sequence 41 Phase 1 phase 2 Phase 3 I * I + + I A I = .0% *> + + <+++ +� E V I A * * ** I Approach I A I ++++ V <+ + *> ++++> TH IT RT TH IT RT G /C= .246 G /C= .298 G/C-- .323 G= 22.1 " G= 26.8 " G= 29.1 " Y= 4.0 " Y= 4.0 Of Y= 4.0 It C= 90 sec �G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int. Param:Units RT TH IT RT TH IT RT TH IT RT TH LT Total Volume: vph 11 575 191 193 5 309 289 731 2 12 9 18 2345 Wiq/Ln:ft /# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 G/C Rqd @C:% 0 21 21 0 20 28 26 25 15 0 12 0 G/C Used: % 0 30 25 0 32 32 30 30 25 0 32 0 SV @E: vph 0 1058 417 0 479 509 439 1061 417 0 381 0 4761 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C+ C C C+ C+ B C+ Deg Sat:V /C .00 .56 .46 .00 .42 .61 .66 .69 .00 .00 .11 .00 .59 Avg Del: sec .0 27.5 30.8 .0 25.7 28.7 32.0 29.4 25.6 .0 21.9 .0 28.9 Tot Del: min 0 269 98 0 85 148 155 358 1 0 15 0 1129 # Stop: vph 0 494 162 0 156 261 254 646 2 0 29 0 2004 Max Que:veh 0 21 7 0 7 10 10 26 0 0 1 0 82 Max Que: ft 0 261 182 0 170 265 258 325 25 0 35 0 325 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total Volume: vph 777 507 1022 39 2345 Svc Lv1:LOS C+ C+ C+ B C+ Deg Sat:V /C .53 .54 .68 .11 .59 Avg Del:sec 28.3 27.6 30.2 23.0 28.9 Tot Del:min 367 233 514 15 1129 # Stop: vph 656 417 902 29 2004 Max Que:veh 28 17 36 1 82 Max Que: ft 261 265 325 35 325 Rainbow Edina 03/02/93 Intersection at Vernon and Link PM Peak Hour 13:25:36 Post- development volumes using ITE dis. supermarket rate SICNAL85/TEAPAC - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Display of: VOLDMES 10 I 518 I 172 I I I WIDTHS 0 1 24 I 12 II I LANES I 0 l 2 1 1 I I I II \ 174 0 0 / I \ -- 5 12 1 ^ 17 0 0 / 9 12 1 -- 11 0 \ I + / 279 12 1 I North I \ I / II I I 2 1 658 I 261 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 41 12 I 24 I 12 I PM N N N N II 1 1 2 1 1 1 LDLG ID ID E 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -1 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** iii • , ry AVERAGE EDNNUNG SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET....... Site #1 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. MJB DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (=Vdd/yy)...... 03 -02 -1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development volumes w /ITE dis. supermarke t rate INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: SHOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 84 152 -- THRU 291 311 0 — RIGHT 162 0 93 -- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 -- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page -2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NOMMOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND --- --- - VEHICLE CCMPOSITION SU TRUCKS $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES $ MOMRCYCTES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTMEOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE AD US MENr CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR IEFIS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH sn=.... Siten DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post- development volumes w /ITE dis. supermarke t rate CAPACITY AND LEVE rOF- SERVICE Page -3 PO►IEN- ACIUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) C=c - v IDS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB IEFT 167 282 256 256 89 E RIGHT 102 864 864 864 761 A MAJOR STREET WB IEFT 92 662 662 662 569 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WE9T STREET'...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUIH STRM.... Site #1 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Post - development volumes w /ITE dis. supermarke t rate 1985 HC M: UNSIGNALIZED IN=EC.TI0NS Page -1 AVERAGE RM4ING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREAPOPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/wEST STRE'ET......... Eden NAME OF THE NORWSOM STREET....... Site #2 NAMEOF ME ANALYST .................. MJB DATE OF ME ANAIXSIS (=Vdd/yy)...... 03 -02 -1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM peak hour 0THER INFORMATION.... Post - development volumes w /ITE dis. supermarke t rate INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORIHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 115 54 -- THRU 395 255 0 — RIGHT 38 0 120 -- NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 -- N ADJUSTMENT FACIOR.S Page -2 PFItCE[U RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGIE FOR RIGHT 'TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND --- -- VEHICLE COMPOSITION $ SU TRUC23 $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHIICLES % MOTORCYCLES EA.SI'BO[JND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NOD 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND -- --- CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR IEFIS MINOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Eden NAME OF THE NOMVSOUTS STREET .... Site#2 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM peak hour OTHER Il1iDRMATION.... Post -development volumes w /ITE dis. supezmarke t rate CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page -3 POTEN- ACIUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY M3VFMENr v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) C=c - v IDS p M SH R SH 1611► • NB IEFT 59 273 238 238 179 D RIGHT 132 874 874 874 742 A MAJOR STREET WB IEFT 127 676 676 676 550 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...... Eden NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUlH STREET'.... Site #2 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 03 -02 -1993 ; PM peak hour anM INFORMATION.... Post - development volumes w /ITE dis. supermarke t rate APPENDIX C Traffic Count Data BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. E a Rainbow Foods Site 111 Third Avenue South Suite 350 Site Code : 11111111 1 on Ave. 8 Link Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Start Date: 12/09/92 Counted By:SAP, RRC File I.D. : EDINA4 Page : 1 Vehicle group 1 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ ° 1500rHoduav lueetbmW I iluG`�F 1N� I I I ObArri otio I I Left Thru Right Other I I Left Thru Right I Other 1 Left Thru Right I Other I Left Thru Right Other I l Total [ e 12/09/92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16:00 3 0 1 0 l 19 93 5 0 l 40 2 19 0 l 1 102 25 0 l 310 — 15 1 3 2 0 l 35 114 6 0 1 35 7 31 0 1 6 125 37 0 l 402 f0 2 4 1 0 1 27 116 5 0 1 39 2 29 0 l 3 141 33 0 l 402 45 0 3 1 0 1 22 121 3 0 1 45 0 18 0 1 0 162 31 0 1 406 Hr Total 6 10 5 0 l 103 444 19 0 1 159 11 97 0 1 10 530 126 0 1 1520 30 5 0 1 0 1 15 144 2 0 1 44 0 20 0 1 0 185 43 0 1 459 17:15 8 1 1 0 1 20 143 3 0( 39 2 17 0 l 1 192 51 0 l 478 30 4 5 8 0 1 31 140 2 0 1 57 3 22 0 l 1 158 37 0 1 468 45 1 0 0 0 L 18 120 2 0 1 36 0 14 0 1 0 127 32 0 1 350 Hr Total 18 6 10 0 1 84 547 9 0 1 176 5 73 0 1 2 662 163 0 1 1755 DO 1 1 0 0 l 9 133 2 0 1 21 0 12 0 l 0 95 32 0 1 306 15 1 1 0 0 1 19 100 1 0 1 25 1 14 0 1 0 77 39 0 1 278 Hr Total 2 2 0 0 1 28 233 3 0 1 46 1 26 0 l 0 172 71 0 1 584 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *TOTAL* 26 18 15 0 1 215 1224 31 0 1 381 17 196 0 1 12 1364 360 0 1 3859 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . -_k Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:30 on 12/09/92 ----------- -- -- ---- ----- - ---- -- Peak start 16:45 l 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 ume 17 9 11 - 1 88 548 10 - 1 185 5 77 - i 2 697 162 - 1 cent 46% 24% 30% - l 14% 85% 2% - 1 69% 2% 29% - 1 0% 81% 19% - 1 Pk total 37 1 646 ( 267 I 861 I hest 17:30 1 17:30 l 17:30 1 17:15 1 ume 4 5 8 - ( 31 140 2 - I 57 3 22 - I 1 192 51 - I Hi total 17 I 173 1 82 1 244 1 .,�� .54 l .93 I .81 I .88 I TRIP GENERATION PROJECTIONS OF ALTERNATIVE LAND USES Alternative land uses were also examined as part of this study. The maximum density of residential and light industrial land uses was determined by applying the appropriate zoning ordinances. Table 3A provides a summary of this information. TABLE 3A PROPOSED RAINBOW FOODS SITE-- EDINA, MN TRIP GENERATION OF ALTERNATE LAND USES ITE Average Trip Rate Trip Generation P.M. peak _T Daily P.M. Peak Daily P.M. Peak Land Use Code Size In / Out Apartments 220 296 units 6.341 /unit 0.591 /unit 1,877 175 112/63 Light Industrial 110 186,220 sf 6.921/1,000 sf 0.561/1,000 sf 1,289 104 12/92 45% Coverage Light Industrial 110 248,290 sf 7.061/1,000 sf 0.771/1,000 sf 1,753 191 23/168 60% Coverage 1 Source: 5th Edition, ITE Trip Generation The traffic projections shown in Table 3A compare favorably with the earlier studies. The difference in expected trip generation between the alternate uses (especially apartments and light industrial - -60 percent coverage) is approximately 300 trips during the evening peak hour and 3,300 trips for a typical weekday. The proposed retail development will generate approximately three times more trips than apartments or industrial uses. While this is a legitimate concern, it should be noted that office, industrial, and residential land uses represent different types of trip purposes. Traffic relating to non - retail land uses are typically new to the adjacent street system and represent the traditional work -to- home /home -to -work trip. Studies (see References in Appendix G) have shown that between 40 and 60 percent of the traffic that patronizes a particular retail land use actually is on the adjacent street system anyway. Therefore, even though a retail land use may generate more trips than other land uses, it can have a less negative impact on the surrounding street system. If the percentage of pass -by trips were expected to be 60 percent, the number of new trips generated by the proposed development would actually be very close to the uses shown in Table 3A. D -1 01/13/93 13:50 DSU. INC. PROPOSM RARMOW FOODS - EDMk IMNUOTA Edina Zoning�Ordinance Section 850.13 Planned Residential Distda - A== PRD-4 Snbd_4A Required Lot Area per Dwelling Unit = 2,900 s.£ Maximum Allowance per Dwelling Unit = (],500 s.£) Required Lot Area 1,400 s.£ Subd.5.A Maeman BmWmg Coverage and Floor Area patio 30 %, FAR = Id/A Apartments 0 1,400 s.f./DU = Land Area (95 ac (43,560))/1,400 s.£ = 296 twits Section 850.17 planned Tndnctriat District SubcL3-D Maximum Bmldmg Coverage 2. Lots of three or nwre acres : 45 percent a. May be increased to 60 per=t if total (WA on lot contained in single building with loading does and berths enclosed wi$da same bu Rding Industual (M 45%: (95 ae (43,560)) .45 = 186,219 G3~A B&Stdal a 605ro: (95 ac (43,560)) .60 = 248,292 CFA ig 001 Post -V b nd fax transmiW memo 7671 a of ► Te e,/n• �/G ip['ihq.t Fawn 1vj L / �/Al�` ii✓ via 33 155; �� 33Z �l5� `=. APPENDIX E ITE Trip Generation Rates Discount- Supermarket (854) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 3 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA:' 106 .Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.76 8.44-10.85 3.30 Data Plot and Equation - -- . Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size 1,400 1,300 1,200 "0 C W 1,100 .0 1,000 M 900 Soo 700 600 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . ....... .................. ............... .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . .......... ........... ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....... ........... ........... .......... ........ ........................ ......... ............. . .......... ..................... .......... ................................... X 60 - .70 so 90 100 110 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Date Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 120 130 ------ Average Rate R2 Pip Generation, January 1991 1428 Institute of Transportation Engineers 'ast Food Restaurant With Drive-Through Window (834) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 8 Average 1. 000 Sq. Feet GFA: 3 Directional Distribution:... 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average. Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation..:-. 632.12 284.00 - 1359.50 266.29 Data Plot and Equation W CL CD 0) 1= 2,800 2,700 2,600 2,500 2,400 2,300 2,200 2,100 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1.400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 -1 ....................................... ................................... ....................................... .............................. ;" ....... X ....................................... .......... ;-: ............ ........... ; ................................. ................... I ..................... ................................................... ........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. .................................. ....... .. ... .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................................................ X Actual Data Points 57 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Equation: Not given -- - - - - Average Rate R2 = •*** 4 Trip Generation, January 1991 1306 Institute of Transportation Engineers Fast Food Restaurant With Drive - Through Window (834) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 59 Average 1000 Sq: Feet GFA: 4 Directional Distribution: :52 %- entering, 48% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area .Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 36.53 8.257- 117.15 " 20.64 Data Plot and Equation N C W CL I- m V M m m <T CD Q 4a .5. 100 0 X X X XX x YN', --- --.....X............ ----- ---- -- . ................... X X X X v X x x X X X x X.. .. ........ ......... X ......... .... .... ........... .XR x X X X X X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: -Not given - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = ** ** Trip Generation, January 1991 1308 Institute of Transportation Engineers Apartme n , Post -1973 20) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, . Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Tral One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 17 Average Number of Dwelling Units: 350 Directional Distribution: 64% entering, 36% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.15-0.83 0.71 Data Plot and Equation y a C W a F- m _U L d c0 d Q 700 600 500 400 300 X49 100 0 X .. -. x;..... .... .... . ... ..... .... ..x -- . .. .... ..._ .... ... .. .... V Juv zVU 3W 400 500 600 700 X = Number of Dwelling Units -X Actual Data Points \ Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.928 Ln(X) - 0.118 f Trip Generation, January 1991 800 900 1000 1100 1200 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.90 322 Institute of Transportation Engineers M Apartmei Post -1 973 0) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 33 Average Number of Dwelling Units: 271 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.28 2.00-11.81 2.81 Data Plot and Equation 7,000 = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points \ Fitted Curve - - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.024 Ln(X) + 1.710 R2 = 0.92 . Trip Generation, January 1991 320 Institute of Transportation ,ngi 3` 4 6,000 ..... ,..--- ----- ------ ------- ----- ..... ..... • CO) 5,000 ' .. . C .... W H 4,000 ..... ... .... ............................... .................... ... _m X: L x: > x CD3.000 ....... • ......:....... ............. - ` ...... -: - ............. . ......:..... . x- ,X Q2.000 ..... . -• . .. ..... - -•- - - -- ==�,x x :......:......: x: x x : x i .<- 1,000 •.... - -... ..... ...... ..... .... -------- -- X x: x X. o 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points \ Fitted Curve - - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.024 Ln(X) + 1.710 R2 = 0.92 . Trip Generation, January 1991 320 Institute of Transportation ,ngi 3` 4 I i I p� ..z. Genet Light Industrial (110) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traf One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies:: 26 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 357 Directional Distribution: 12% entering, 88% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation r 0.98 0.08-4.50 1,16 Data Plot and Equation 5,000 4,0 00 y a c W CL H 3,0 m U L m m 2,000 CD Q 11 F- 1,000 0 X ...................... .. 00 �X � X X X n \ .,-VV 2,000 3,000 'X =_1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 1.433(X) - 163.421 R2 = 0.88 Trip Generation, January 1991 6w"��. :per: 94 Institute of Transportation' Engineers General 1 i( ht Industrial J( 10) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 18 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 203 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trio Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area .Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.97 1.58-16.87 4.24 Data Plot and Eauation 7,000 X 6,000 ........................................... ........ ....... . -- --- ...... 0 X C 5.000 ..... -. ..... _ ....... W m4,000 ................. ............. ......... .......... V X m3.000 ........ : .........:.................... ...._ . .............................. > II2.000 ........ ..... ........ - ....... ....... ; X' 1,000 .....X...•.... .....•..........• .................... .•.........:......... ........... X X , -" X X I X ; 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Date Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.468(X) - 101.921 Trip Generation, January 1991 600 700 800 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.81 92 Institute of Transportation Engineers APPENDIX F Rainbow Foods Customer Transaction Data Sunday 12113192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 200.00 --------' --------'--- 180.00 ------------ ... ----- ....... ... .... '---------�+-- 160.00 i 100.00 --------- ------------ ................ — ......... ... .... ..... ............ ............ ................ .... ........ ' .... —' ... ... ---- Page 1 PACHALS Chart 2 Tuesday 12115192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 160.00 0.00 C14 11 O N C7 mr Ln CD 1- 00 O O ^ N C'7 :t LA CD CD O N N N N Page 1 —m— 58, 59, & 60 ave. PACFIALS Chart 2 Wednesday 1211692 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 Page 1 —'— 58, 59, & 60 ave. PACFIALS Chart 2 Monday 12114192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 0.00 i i T !Tf -i i i 1 1 ' - +- 1 1T -T1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 CD — N M et un M r� W m o .- r N e 2 v ' �! !2 .� " m - rn o N N N R Page 1 —m— 58, 59, & 60 ave. 140.00 120.00 100.00 80.00 40.00 20.00 PACHALS Chart 2 Thursday 12117192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 58, 59, & 60 ave. ..... .... .. ..... .. ... to — .. .................... . I I. -... 11 ■ 0.00 4= — CN m -cr M M r� = m = 7: N C! � l2 C2 :�- !20 O2 cc:'i' N "C4 CM Page 1 P8C1ALS Chart Friday 12118192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 140.00 -r------'-- 120.00 + ------- 100.00 f-------'-'---'---�-' 8000 +-- '--' --------'---- 60.00 + ......... ... Page PACHALS Chart 2 Saurday 12119192 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 Page 1 PACFI.XLS Chart 2 Sunday 113193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 Page 1 PACHALS Chart 2 Monday 114193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 160.00 140.00 _.. _... .._ ..._... 120.00 _ ........................._ _..........._ ............ _..........................._....................................._._......_................... ..........._._................. ■ .... .._. ..... ..... ............... 0.00 i 7-!-T O •- N M of l!9 CO 1� O O O ^ N f� <F ll1 tD h 00 Qf N N N N Page 1 PACFI.XLS Chart 2 Tuesday 115193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 140.00 4 . . . ........ ....... .... ..... . I ...... ......... .. .. ................ ---. 120.00 + 100.00 + 80.00 +- 60.00 1 . ..... .......... .......... .. .. .. I .................... .............. 40.00 ................ . .. ........ 20.00 + . ...... 0.00 i T. Ti cm cli m of M M P� M m O r = ;:� C4 M 7: �2 c4 cli cli " Page 1 58, 59, & 60 ave. PACHALS Chart 2 Wednesday 116193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 160.00 -7 - - - - 0.00 CN M -It LO W r- w M �t to CO — :I- E �2 ccl',Ij CMIJ Page 1 58, 59, & 60 ave. PACHALS Chart 2 Thursday 117193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 140.00 Page 1 PACHALS Chart 2 Friday 118193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 160.00 Page 1 250.00 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 PACFIALS Chart 2 Saturday 19193 ave. for stores 58, 59, & 60 0.00 I I T-TT I I I _1 I 1 1_ 1 _1_ - _1 _ 1 I 1 _lam O N f`9 U7 CD Q1 = 7: N C`7 l7 llJ CD rz m Z Q1 .- .-- � N N N N Page 1 —■— 58, 59, & 60 ave. PACHALS Chart 3 Sunday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 Pape 1 —'— 12113.12119 113.119 PACFI.XLS Chart 3 Monday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 Hour of day Page 1 PACFI.XLS Chart 3 Tuesday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 160.00 140.00 ..................../....`... ... .. . ...... .. ..... .......... .......... _.._..... ...... ..._. _.._. 120.00 100.00 .._ ....................... _.............._ ..... .o .............. .. Ea ❑ ■ ` 80.00 .......... .. ... ... ...._.. o u�' 60.00 _ __._. ..... _ .._ _ _ . _........ _ _........ _ . _. . _ .. ........... _...._ . _.... ....._ _._. 40.00 .. ...._.... ........ _ ._ . _....... ......... ......... _ b ,,.... 20.00 _.....:� ...... _.._.._ 0.00 O N m a7 LO CO P- m C" O N ^ N N N Hour of day Pape 1 ■— 12113 -12119 113. 119 PACFIALS Chart 3 Wednesday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 LU.UU ... .. .... ........ ....... .. I.. ..... .. ... _. ........ ..... ..� i 0.00 ■ O •-- N M Tt LO W e- m M O ^ N !7 et I.L) fD 1� m O2 N N N N Hour of day Page 1 PACF1.XLS Chart 3 100.00 + 80.00 ... ..... . ..... . . . .. .. .. .. ........... . .... .. .......... ... .. . ..... 60.00 40.00 20.00 ...... .. .. .. .. 0.00 i i T i i i i i i i i i i i i i p i cz M r- M M = 7- !2 C2 �t L2 C2 ":: !!! �2 24 ;:� C"4 M" Hour of day Page 1 PACFI.XLS Chart 3 Friday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 160.00 _ ..........._....... _.........__._ ...... ............._..............._. . 140.00 ... ....... ................ ...... ...... ...._....._........._......................... ............................... 120.00 _ ..................................._........._........_............................._......._... _........�\..................... � \...... ........ 100.00 ;............_..o-i ....._ ..................... E i 20.00 . i ...... ............................... 0.00 O - N M --cr M M 1- m M O ^ N f 2 t N N N N Hour of day Page 1 PACFIALS Chart 3 Saturday ave. for 58, 59, & 60 250.00 -r . ...... - 200.00 + .. ..... .. .. 2 150.00 0 E ci *t 100.00 50.00 +-- - --- -- - - - - ......................... 12113 - 12119 113 - 119 . ............... ..... .. .......... ... 0.00 cz — CN M -ct LO W r� W M M N C2 � l2 !2 :- O2 F! C=%j ;74 "" Cm%4 Hour of day Page 1 REFERENCES 1. Slade, L.J. and Gorove, F.E. "Reduction in estimate of Traffic Impacts of Regional Shopping Centers." ITE Journal, January 1981, pp. 16 -18. 2. Kittelson, W.K. and Lawton, T.K. "Evaluation of Shopping Center Trip Types." ITE Journal 1987, pp. 35 -39. 3. Kenig, K.S. et al "Use of Trip Diversion as a means to reduce Site - Generated Volumes." ITE Compendium of Papers, 57th annual meeting, August 1987, pp. 291 -294. 4. "Trip Generation Study for Prince George's County -- Summary Report." JHK & Associates, February 1984. 5. Moussaui, M. and Gorman, M.N. "Refinement of Procedures Used for Estimating Pass -By Trip Percentages." ITE Journal, May 1992, pp. 13 -16. G -1 APPENDIX H Planning Level Capacity Analysis of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue Avurrlru an �� f tf% 23 3 ¢fL Law ��y —hy 75s � r✓ � L 5zo v r/csvrf__&4/..�.�1.�__ --- �+zc a A rte. S -N - J 1 1� I .f I I I 1 WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS EDEN AVENUE SITE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA SUBMITTED BY: WATSON CENTERS, INC. AND RAINBOW FOODS 31 MARCH 1993 WATSON CENTERS INC. / RAINBOW FOODS EDEN AVENUE PROPOSAL PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The following written summary has been prepared, to facilitate the review of the proposed Rainbow Foods Eden Avenue development, This summary includes a brief overview of the project that describes both the existing site conditions and the proposed development. It also identifies past proposals, planning relationships, key issues, and the decisions and actions necessary to determine the ultimate use of the property. This background information includes an assessment of how the proposal relates to the existing comprehensive plan and of the role the project may play in the future redevelopment of the area. It also presents a discussion of why this is an appropriate use of this property, and how the development will benefit both the area and community. The summary includes several photographs of the existing site and adjacent properties both to provide a visual frame of reference for reviewing the proposal and also to illustrate some of the site issues affecting the approval and development of the property. DESCRIPTION OF SUBMISSION CONTENTS The following required and supplemental information have been provided to assist in the review of this proposal. Boundary Surveys: Lewis Engineering Property Demars, Gabriel, Land Surveyors, Inc., 11/11/67, 1 " =40' Kunz Property Egan, Field, & Nowak 7/13/66, 1 " =60' Existing Conditions Plan: This composite map was prepared from the existing site boundary surveys, and includes adjacent roadways, curb cuts and buildings taken from the 1989 Hennepin County aerial photos, contours taken from the 1974 City aerial photo contour map, and the Eden Avenue / Link Road / Sherwood Road layout taken from City Construction Plans dated July 31, 1989. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 2 Preliminary Development Plan: This preliminary site plan illustrates the proposed development concept and includes the layout of the proposed building, parking and loading area as well as summary information about the plan. In addition, this plan also suggests the preliminary placement of the major landscape plantings that will be used to buffer, screen and enhance the property. These plans are provided at a 1"=40' scale approved by City staff. Written Summary With Site Photographs: This summary is provided to describe the site characteristics and relationships with surrounding parcels, and to assist in understanding the proposed site design. Preliminary Traffic Study: The traffic study (prepared by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc.) was commissioned by the project developer Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods to forecast and analyze the affects that the additional traffic generated by the Rainbow Foods store and restaurant would have on the transportation system serving the site and adjacent area. Illustrative Photographs The preliminary photographic examples included in this submission package were prepared by the Rainbow Foods - Store Development Division. The proposed site is an important part of the Grandview Redevelopment Area and the proposed facility must reflect a high level of architectural and development - quality. The developers understand the importance of this site and are fully committed to working with the City to develop a quality facility that will satisfy the aesthetic and functional needs of the community while providing Edina's residents with an attractive and valuable shopping alternative. The store examples included, illustrate the type of facilities that have been recently developed in other communities through similar planning processes. PROJECT OVERVIEW EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS LOCATION The proposed site is located in the City's Grandview Area to the west of Highway 100 and east of Vernon Avenue. The property is bounded on the north by Eden Avenue, on the east by the Soo Line Railroad and on the west by the side and rear yards of a small commercial property and two small office uses. The southern most tip of the property abuts a developed single family lot that is part of a small - forty three home - neighborhood. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 3 SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed site has been assembled from several developed and undeveloped parcels. It includes the old Kunz OR warehouse and Lewis Engineering properties. It also includes a small parcel (approximately 35.12 by 90 feet) that protrudes into the southwestern part of the site, between the Kunz Oil Building and the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building. This parcel is a vacated portion of Eden Circle and is part of the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse property. Watson Centers, Inc. and Brentwood Commercial the owners of the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building have entered into discussions to exchange the vacated Eden Circle property for a strip of land (twenty feet wide) along the west boundary in the southern part of the site as shown on Figure 2. This property exchange will benefit both properties by establishing a new more efficient common boundary and more usable sites. The exchange will eliminate the unusable protruding parcel and will increase the overall usable parcel size and rear yard setback of the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building. This rear yard will be increased from 10 -feet to 30 -feet. The total area of the proposed Watson Centers / Rainbow Foods site including the vacated Eden Circle parcel is approximately 357,530 square feet or 8.21 acres. PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The site slopes from west to east with the highest elevations along the northwest boundary and the lowest point in the northeast corner. The northwest corner of the site is approximately thirty feet higher than the northeast comer. The Edina Pet Hospital and TSC office building along the northwest boundary are approximately ten to fifteen feet above the general level of the site. These adjacent uses reflect the pronounced grade difference with exposed basement levels, significant retaining walls and steep slopes along the common boundary with the site. The east side of the TSC office building that faces the site is an unpainted blank concrete block wall approximately twelve to twenty-four feet high. The east side of the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building - the side facing the southern part of the site - is also a blank concrete block wall. The site is bounded on the east by the Soo Line Rail Line which is approximately eight to ten feet above the site along much of this boundary. VEGETATION The past industrial uses have left very little vegetation remaining on the site. The southwestern comer of the property along the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building includes a small area of mostly young volunteer deciduous trees. Several large spruce trees are located on the west side of the Kunz Oil building and a single large elm is located immediately east of the Lewis Engineering building. The residential area to the south and Our Lady of Grace Catholic School to the southeast are very well buffered by existing heavily wooded areas to the south and east of the site. Murg nd 15' NO— BUILD ACCESS EASEMENT Kunz Oil LAND EXCHANGE NN Deed to Vatson Centers/Rainbow Foods 2 0' LAND EXCHANCf Deed to Eden Circle Office/ Varehouse ----U I WATSON CENTERS, INC. Preliminary NoffH MOLA-61 & RAINBOW FOODS Development 0• 20' 40' 80, I EDINA, MINNESOTA I Land Exchange I March 31, 1993 1 WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 4 EXISTING ZONING The proposed site is currently zoned Planned Industrial District (PID). The properties to the north across Eden Avenue and Link Road and to the northwest across Sherwood Road are zoned for Planned Commercial and Planned Industrial uses. The properties along the east side of the railroad right -of - -way are zoned Planned Industrial District and R -1 Single Family. The properties to the west are zoned for Planned Industrial, Planned Office and Planned Commercial uses. The small residential area to the south is zoned R -1 Single Family. EXISTING LAND USE The site includes two large obsolete and deteriorating industrial buildings and large paved and unpaved parking, loading and outdoor storage areas. Both the Kunz Oil warehouse and Lewis Engineering buildings are one story (high ceiling) concrete block structures. The Kunz Oil Building is currently occupied by an auto parts distributor while the Lewis Engineering Building is vacant. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The properties surrounding the site are developed. However, much of this existing development is aging, under utilized, functionally obsolete, or nonconforming. The properties located immediately to the north across Eden Avenue and Link Road include the Edina School Bus Garages, a commercial center with a Car Wash, a Super America, a medical clinic, and a newly redeveloped commercial center that includes a Jerry's Super Value Store, an office tower and a two level parking deck. The properties located to the west and southwest across Vernon Avenue include four multiple housing developments including Vernon Terrace, Interlachen Court, Highland Villa, and Vernon Oaks. These developments form a strip of multi- residential housing that begins at the Vernon Avenue / Link Road intersection and extends south along Vernon for approximately one -half mile. An Amoco Station is located to the northwest between Sherwood Road and Vernon Avenue and a hair styling salon is located on Sherwood just south of the Edina Pet Hospital. The properties abutting the site along the western boundary include the TSC Office Building, the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building and the Edina Pet Hospital. The properties to the east of the site on the opposite side of the Soo Line rail line include several small and aging industrial buildings and the Our Lady of Grace Catholic School and grounds. The northern two thirds of this area is completely screened from the proposed site by the railway roadbed which forms a berm that is eight. to ten feet high. The southern part of this area is well buffered by the existing landform and wooded area along the eastern side of the track. Clinic Super I li America �oI I I I � ��►I11' 1 v q�l A co lllll 0 ►III. Ill ll / r Lewis r /Ili `\ 1:3 111' 1 %ill // / Eng. o 'III Pe l ullk i 11 1 1J9 II \ 1 'I / is air 1 ignl Kunz O1 1 \ t Ic TSC co(o I1 0ffice�l� I p ♦ �- - - -- i t 0. t `\ —\` I I \ �P�dound — \ \ —\ �t Eden 0 Circle Office/ Warehouse II — I Edenmoor Edina i Schools I I Bus, Gatager — f1 I / jlk J ) '1 FV WATSON CENTERS, INC. Preliminary M NOM & RAINBOW FOODS Development w ", aw law Existing EDINA, MINNESOTA I Conditions March 31, 1993 on I ;� k �r �',7� .,...., ,� .: a^ •.,...,. :ti^ .,s s .r �•::, rr .., .�,.. . . i K'e r'e.: '.'us .: i K ru Z KUNZ OIL WAREHOUSE (View Northwest) 1-44 jr 3 RAILROAD BERM (View East toward Site) -ft 1, , -lr~ LLi�� r. A 'Oki ' li Y is 5 EDEN CIRCLE OFFICE/ (View West) WAREHOUSE LOADING AREA TSC OFFICE BUILDING (View West) Ra '7 VERNON AVE./LINK RD./SHERMAN RD. (View Northwest) WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 5 The southern tip of the property abuts a single family lot that is part of a small residential area. Views to the site from the existing home built on this lot are blocked by the Eden Circle Office / Warehouse Building. Views from the lot itself will continue to be effectively screened by the existing vegetation. EXISTING ACCESS The site fronts on Eden Avenue. Local access from the north, south, east and west will be from Vernon Avenue, to the Link Road intersection, to Eden Avenue and to the site. Access from the north and east will also be from Vernon Avenue to Arcadia to Eden. Avenue. Access from the east will also be provided by Eden Avenue. Access from the small residential area to the south will be via Sherwood Road to Eden Avenue. Freeway access to and from Highway 100 is provided at the Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue interchange. Safe and convenient access is very important to the operation and ultimate success of the proposed Rainbow Foods Store and Restaurant. Customers must be able to visit the store without experiencing significant inconvenience or congestion. From this perspective it is.apparent that avoiding excess traffic congestion is as important to the developers as it is to the community. The developer commissioned Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. to conduct a Traffic Impact Study to address the affects of the proposed uses on the area roadways and intersections. The following is a brief summary of the key conclusions and recommendations from this study. The study which includes a detailed traffic analysis and supporting information is included in the submission. According to the study, the existing street system surrounding the site generally works well and will need only relatively minor alterations to continue to work well after development. The study also indicates that although the proposed commercial uses will generate more trips overall than a high density residential or industrial use, the proposed commercial traffic will peak at different times than the existing surrounding uses which will result in little additional impact. The study indicates that between forty and sixty percent of the peak evening hour retail traffic visiting the site will be "pass -by" trips - basically traffic that would be using the area roads whether or not the proposed facility were present. The study indicates that as "pass -by" trips approach sixty percent, the actual number of "new trips" generated by this commercial proposal would be very similar to either a high density residential or industrial development. The study recommends several relatively minor improvements to the streets serving the area to accommodate the additional traffic that would be generated by the proposed project. The recommended improvements include a striped three lane section on Eden Avenue, an east bound turn lane for the west site entrance, and improved signage near the Super America on Link Road. The developer will pay for these necessary improvements. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 6 GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The 1980 Comprehensive Plan indicated that the Grandview District was showing signs of blight, and inappropriate and nonconforming land uses. The plan established goals to help guide the community and prospective developers in the redevelopment of the area. In July of 1984 the Grandview Redevelopment Plan was adopted and the Grandview Area Tax Increment District was established. The following 1980 comprehensive plan goals were included in the Grand Avenue Redevelopment Plan. Watson Centers Inc. and Rainbow Foods suggest that their proposed project conforms to these goals and that the approval and subsequent development of this project will advance the City's objectives for the property and Grandview Area. Goal 2. Promote and secure development and redevelopment in a manner that allows the most logical and efficient arrangement and intensity of land uses. The unique characteristics of this community scale commercial anchor — size, traffic needs, intensity of use and desired centralized relationship to the market — suggest that it would be a logical and efficient use of this community oriented site. The needs of the community as well as the needs of this proposed business can both be accommodated at this location. -The sites proximity to the Highway 100 interchange and Vernon Avenue, in combination with trip generation characteristics that are compatible with the surrounding residential uses, will accommodate convenient and efficient vehicular access. In addition the site is within comfortable walking distance of the multi - family housing along Vernon Avenue. The development of this- large and popular store will undoubtedly attract additional customers to the area which will increase the overall customer base for the existing businesses. It is also the type of commercial anchor facility that is capable of attracting new community oriented commercial businesses that will add to the diversity and vitality of the area. Goal Z To undertake certain land acquisitions and parcel assembly and parcel disposition to eliminate certain substandard and nonconforming uses and buildings and to assemble logical conforming and more efficient sites. The Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering properties were specifically identified in the Grand Avenue Redevelopment Plan as having nonconforming buildings, parking setbacks, exterior building materials and landscaping. The Watson Centers / Rainbow Foods proposal will eliminate these two blighted, substandard and noncorforming buildings which have hobbled area redevelopment efforts for almost a decade. If approved, the proposal will result in the construction of a high quality commercial facility, designed to reflect contemporary community needs and standards. In addition the proposed development will result in a cooperative assembly and exchange of property that will improve the efficiency and WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 7 function of both the site and the adjacent Eden Circle Office / Warehouse property. Goal 11. To promote and secure increased landscaping on private and public right -of -way to improve the aesthetics, provide identity for the commercial area and improve the transitions along the areas perimeter. Development of this proposal will result in a new facility that will be carefully designed and constructed to satisfy functional needs, reflect community aesthetic values and relate to and strengthen the identity of the Grandview Area. This project will include extensive new landscaping with over seventy overstory deciduous or evergreen trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs. The landscaping will be designed to screen and buffer this facility from any sensitive perimeter uses and to visually integrate the project into its surroundings. The facility will also preserve a large area of open space in the southern part of the property to enhance the transition to the lower intensity residential uses. PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS AND ACTIONS The Kunz Oil Warehouse and Lewis Engineering properties have been the subject of a great deal of study, discussion and several proposals over the past nine years. The following represent the major proposals and actions affecting the redevelopment of these parcels. In February and March of 1986 the City Council held public hearings on land use alternatives for the Grandview Area. The City's planning consultant identified the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties as blighted and under utilized and recommended the parcels be designated for multi - family use. In September of 1986 the City Council was asked to consider a proposal for the Kunz Oil / Lewis Engineering properties. This proposal by the Knutsen Companies called for the HRA to acquire, write down, and make the property available to the developer for the construction of a four story 210 unit apartment project. The project was abandoned by the developer. In July and December of 1986 the City Council approved a redevelopment project including a parking ramp, public works garage and related bond sale for the Jerry's Super Value property north of Eden Avenue. On July 13, 1987 the City Council met to review the Comprehensive Plan. The Council affirmed that the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties should be redeveloped with some type of multi - family housing and referred the matter to staff for the preparation of additional information and alternatives. In May of 1988 the planning commission reviewed preliminary plans submitted by Jerry's Enterprises for the retail redevelopment of the Edina School Bus garage facility and the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties. In July 1989 Link Road / Sherwood Road was reconstructed and signalized at Vernon Avenue. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 8 In October of 1989 the HRA adopted a resolution to acquire the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties by eminent domain if necessary. City staff was authorized to pursue an agreement with Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation for the redevelopment of the property. In September of 1990 the City Council held a public hearing to discuss a petition submitted by Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation for the rezoning of the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties from PID to PCD -2. The matter was referred to staff and the hearing continued. The project was abandoned by the developer. On August 19, 1991 the City Council adopted a resolution that amended the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map within three commercial redevelopment areas. The Planning Commission felt that based on the variety of redevelopment proposals that had been considered, the strongest position to take for the Grandview Area was to leave it designated as Industrial. Based on the Planning Commission recommendation and Council consideration the Grandview Redevelopment Area 4 was to remain designated as Industrial. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan establishes general goals to provide for the orderly and logical development and redevelopment of lands and waters, while responding to the changing needs of the population. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Element also states that effective management requires that the plan be treated as a living document subject to modification and revision during the life of plan. This plan, though thoughtfully and carefully conceived and drafted is almost 13 years old and much has changed during this time period. In the mid - eighties consultant studies and community discussions suggested that the redevelopment of the Kunz Oil / Lewis properties represented a excellent opportunity to add needed multi- family housing to the Grandview Area. Since that time the Vernon Terrace and Vernon Oaks multi- housing projects have been constructed, adding 285 multi- housing units to the area. Vernon Terrace a senior housing development experienced financial difficulties. During that same time period, the Knutsen Companies chose not to invest in developing a four story market rate apartment on the site. Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods suggest that it is time to consider a change in the redevelopment focus of this site to reflect the changing needs of the community and market place. Over the past eighteen years the metropolitan area has experienced periods of overbuilding for virtually every land use including multiple residential, office and strip commercial. The subsequent excess supply of these uses in combination with three recessionary cycles and the associated economic problems since the mid - seventies have resulted in little progress toward creating a viable redevelopment project on this site. If approved, the Watson Centers / Rainbow Foods proposal will help bring this extended period of redevelopment stagnation to an end. NEED FOR PROPOSED FACILITY A location evaluation of this site was prepared for Rainbow Foods by the Scrivner Inc. Market Research Department in August of 1991. This study was conducted to evaluate and forecast the sales volume for a Rainbow Foods facility at this location. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 9 The study evaluated the proposed site, competitive environment, and relevant area economic and demographic data. The primary trade area identified in this evaluation encompasses the entire community of Edina as well as parts of St. Louis Park, Hopkins, and Minneapolis. The study indicates that this location is geographically centralized in a trade area that includes the densely populated northern, central and southwestern parts of Edina. It also points out that there is a lack of direct competition within the area and that a store at this location will serve approximately 84,000 people. A Rainbow Foods store at this location will provide the residents of the community with a convenient, high quality, and aggressively priced alternative to the more typical upscale Jerry's, and Lunds. According to the site evaluation, there are many area residents who will support and benefit from such a shopping alternative. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM The developer of this project is Watson Centers Inc., a Minnesota Corporation located in Minneapolis and Rainbow Foods located in Hopkins, Minnesota. WATSON COMPANIES BACKGROUND The Watson Companies began in 1925 as a general contractor in Minneapolis. The Watson Companies grew to be one of the largest general contractors in the Midwest and was responsible for the construction of many of the major buildings in this region. In 1940, the Watson Companies expanded into the development of office /warehouse combinations, motels and other commercial properties for their own account. In 1969, Watson Centers was formed as the shopping center development arm of the Watson Companies. Since that time, Watson Centers has been involved in the development of nearly 3 million square feet of shopping center space. This shopping center experience includes facilities that range in size from enclosed mall suburban centers such as the $46.0 million, 950,000 square foot Valley West Mall in Des Moines, Iowa to the Rainbow Center, a $5.6 million, 73,000 square foot commercial redevelopment project in Minneapolis, Minnesota. WATSON CENTERS PERSONNEL The three individuals within the Watson Centers organization responsible for new projects are Stephen Watson, Dan Bergeron and Brad Henning. Steve Watson's background includes graduation from both the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science Degree and from the Tuck School at Dartmouth College with an MBA. After holding financial management positions at the 3M Company and the Leisure Group, he joined his family construction and development business in the development of shopping centers and other commercial properties. To date, we have developed 15 shopping centers and continue to own shopping centers. Steve's areas of concentration at Watson Centers are finance and general management. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 10 Dan Bergeron is Vice President in charge of Leasing for Watson Centers. His background includes graduation from the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science Degree and 20 years' experience in commercial real estate development. Dan has personally been involved in the development of 24 shopping centers and holds the CSM designation granted by the International Council of Shopping Centers. Dan has the proven knowledge of real estate and retailers that is essential to a successful leasing program. Brad Henning is Controller for Watson Centers. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Minnesota and is a CPA with seven years of public accounting experience. Brad joined Watson Centers in 1985 and is responsible for financial reporting and controls. REFERENCES We submit the following references which we feel will be most meaningful in your evaluation of Watson Centers' ability to put together a quality retail development: I. Financial: A. Mr. Anthony Pasko (Tony) Norwest Bank Minneapolis Norwest Center Sixth and Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479-0089 (612) 667 -8794 B. Mr. Jeff Jonswold Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard Suite 1490 Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 (612) 921 -2100 C. Mr. Jon Dahlin Eberhardt Companies 81 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 339 -4210 D. Mr. Thomas Crowley Vice President Heitman Financial Services, Ltd. 4408 IDS Tower 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 332 -1603 WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 U III. Governmental: A. Ms. Lorrie Louder or Mr. James White Minneapolis Community Development Corp. 250 South Fourth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 (612) 348 -7121 B. Mr. Jim Mohn City of Duluth Department of Planning & Development 409 City Hall Duluth, MN 55802 (218) 723 -3328 Retail: A. Mr. Dennis Crowe Rainbow Food Stores 1515 Excelsior Avenue East Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 (612) 931 -1100 B. Mr. Fred Hubbell, Chairman of the Board Younkers Department Store PO Box 1495 Des Moines, Iowa 50397 (515) 2441112 C. Mr. Rich Evans ShopKo Stores, Inc. 700 Pilgrim Way Green Bay, Wisconsin 54304 (414) 496 -7113 D. Mr. George Torrey Herberger's Department Store 600 Mall Germain St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 If you have any questions or desire further information, please feel free to call Watson Centers, Inc. at (612) 920 -5034. Page 11 SHOPPING CENTERS OWNED BY WATSON CENTERS Gross Leasable Center Name Location Area Valley West West Des Moines, Iowa 950,000 Sq.Ft. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 12 Park Drive Omaha, Nebraska 100,000 Sq.Ft. Traverse City Traverse City, Michigan 130,000 Sq.Ft. Rainbow Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 75,000 Sq.Ft. St. Croix Mall Stillwater, Minnesota 280,000 Sq.Ft. St. Croix Center Stillwater, Minnesota 20,000 Sq.Ft. Stone Ridge Center Duluth, Minnesota 355,000 Sq.Ft. SHOPPING CENTERS DEVELOPED BY THE WATSON COMPANIES Gross Leasable Center Name Location Area Valley West Glendale, Arizona 600,000 Sq.Ft. College Park Phoenix, Arizona 80,000 Sq.Ft. Kandi Mall Willmar, Minnesota 200,000 Sq.Ft. Minnesota Valley Shakopee, Minnesota 160,000 Sq.Ft. Village Ten Coon Rapids, Minnesota 175,000 Sq.Ft. Valley West West Des Moines, Iowa 950,000 Sq.Ft. Valley North Fargo, North Dakota 100,000 Sq.Ft. Brookings Mall Brookings, South Dakota 150,000 Sq.Ft. Park Drive Omaha, Nebraska 100,000 Sq.Ft. Traverse City Traverse City, Michigan 130,000 Sq.Ft. Valley West Park West Des Moines, Iowa 25,000 Sq.Ft. Rainbow Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 75,000 Sq.Ft. Centrum Plaza Lincoln, Nebraska 60,000 Sq.Ft. St. Croix Mall Stillwater, Minnesota 280,000 Sq.Ft. St. Croix Center Stillwater, Minnesota 20,000 Sq.Ft. Stone Ridge Center Duluth, Minnesota 355,000 Sq.Ft. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 13 RAINBOW FOODS Rainbow Foods is a locally operated group of grocery stores that has developed from the former Applebaum Food stores. The first generation of Rainbow stores opened ten years ago under a typical basic warehouse format. Today's third generation stores have evolved into upscale, service oriented grocery stores that emphasize expanded perishable departments and include a service deli with a sit -down eating area, a service meat and fish department, a McGlynn Bakery, a customer service counter and an in -store branch bank facility. These new stores provide both increased service and a low price structure to compete with the price leaders in this market. The proposed store will be similar to our newest stores in Woodbury and Plymouth, but will include a deli seating area. We currently operate a total of 28 stores in the greater Twin City area. The development team is coordinated by Stephen M. Watson of Watson Centers Inc. and Dennis Crowe, Vice President of store development for Rainbow Foods. The development team consultants include the following: Planner: Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. is responsible for the planning, analysis and site design for this project. Traffic Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. is Engineer responsible for the transportation planning and analysis. Legal Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman, Ltd. is responsible for all legal counsel. Architecture A project architect will be selected upon approval of the preliminary develoment plan. The project architect will be responsible for the final development building design and plans. Landscape Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. is Architecture responsible for the landscape design. Market Scrivner, Inc. - Market Research Analysis Department is responsible for the location evaluation for the Rainbow Foods. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposal calls for the development of a Rainbow Foods Store and a quick service restaurant on the site. The Rainbow Foods is a large warehouse style grocery store that will include 66,000 gross square feet of space. The restaurant will include approximately 4,800 gross square feet for food preparation and seating and will have a drive - through window. Watson Center's / Rainbow Foods are requesting a zoning change from PID to PCD -2. They are also asking that the Comprehensive Plan be amended concurently to reflect this change. The Rainbow Foods Store is a permitted use in PCD -2. The restaurant is a permitted use in PCD -2 and the drive- through facility is an Accessory Use in PCD -2. WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 14 The proposal calls for the development of a total of 70,800 gross square feet of new buildings on the property. The assembled property totals approximately 357,530 square feet or 8.21 acres. The Floor Area Ratio (GFA/GLA) for the proposed project is approximately .20 FAR. The proposed .20 FAR is well under the maximum 1.5 floor area ratio allowed in PCD -2. BUILDING SETBACKS The required building setbacks in the PCD -2 district are: 35 -feet front street 25 -feet side street 25 -feet interior side yard 25 -feet rear yard The proposal meets or exceeds all required building setbacks BUILDING HEIGHT The maximum building height allowed in PCD -2 is four stories or 50 -feet. Depending on the final design, the proposed Rainbow Foods Store may vary in height between 22 and 35 -feet. The proposed quick service restaurant will be approximately 14 -feet high. BUILDING MATERIALS Both buildings will be designed to reflect community aesthetic values and'will be constructed utilizing quality materials including face brick veneers on all four sides. PARKING The Edina Zoning Ordinance requires (under other retail) eight parking spaces for the first 1,000 sf, plus six spaces per 1,000 between 2,000 and 15,000 sf, plus 5 spaces per 1,000 over 15,000 sf. Based on this formula the Rainbow Food Store (66,000 sf) needs 347 parking spaces. The proposal provides this required number of spaces. The Edina Zoning Ordinance also requires that restaurants must have parking spaces equal to one -third of the maximum seating capacity plus one space per employee on the major shift. The Watson Centers / Rainbow Foods proposal provides 80 parking spaces for the restaurant. This number of spaces will accommodate 210 patrons and 10 employees on the major shift. The number of spaces allocated to the restaurant provides 16.7 spaces per 1000 sf. The proposal calls for the construction of a total of 427 parking spaces to be shared by Rainbow Foods and the restaurant. Representative Store Facade R!- � � k I Representative Store Interior WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 15 The ordinance calls for full size spaces spaces to be 8 -1/2 feet by 18 -feet and for driving aisles to be 24 -feet wide. This standard results in a 60 -feet wide double loaded bay and a 42 -feet wide single loaded bay. The parking spaces shown on this proposal meet or exceed these dimensions. The spaces are shown at 9 -feet wide to accommodate the development of cart corrals and handicapped spaces, and to provide for ease of customer parking maneuvers. PARKING SETBACKS The ordinance calls for parking setbacks of twenty feet along a public street right -of -way and ten feet along an interior or rear lot line. The ordinance also calls for a ten feet wide setback between a principal use building and parking or drives. The proposal includes a parking setback that varies in width between a minimum of 20 -feet and a maximum of 28 -feet along the Eden Avenue public right -of -way. This parking setback along Eden Avenue averages approximately 24 -feet in width. The proposal includes 17 spaces along the interior lot line between the Rainbow Foods Store and the rear of the TSC Office Building that are setback four feet from the property line. The rear facade of the TSC Office Building facing this boundary is a one to two story high unfinished concrete block wall. The TSC property along this boundary also includes existing terraced retaining walls and a parking lot that is approximately 10 to 15 -feet above the elevation of the proposed parking lot. Placing the parking closer to the interior lot line along this blank side allows for a ten feet wide buffer strip between the Rainbow Foods building and the parking area. This additional space adjacent to the building will allow trees to be placed along the building facade which will result in more effective buffering of both the building and loading areas. The proposal also includes a 25 -feet wide service drive along the eastern property boundary with the Soo Line Railroad. This drive is closer than 10- feet-aiong a 300 -feet long portion of the boundary which coincides with the industrial area to the east. The drive is within 3 -feet of the boundary at the closest point. The Soo Line Railroad forms a six to eight feet high berm along this property line that will effectively screen the drive from the properties to the east. Placing the drive closer to this permanent berm allows for a larger buffer space along the eastern side of the Rainbow Foods building. This added space will allow increased landscaping along this facade which will greatly enhance the buffering of the building itself. LOADING The ordinance calls for Planned Commercial Districts to have: 0 berths for 0 to 5,000 sf (GFA) 1 small berth for 5,001 to 20,000 sf (GFA) 1 small & 1 large 20,001 to 100,000 sf (GFA) Based on these requirements Rainbow Foods Store requires two small and one large loading berth. The size and operating characteristics of the Rainbow Foods Store require additional loading berths to function efficiently. The 4,800 sf restaurant does not require a loading berth. The proposal shows two separate loading areas — IF o Ginic Edina Va sh Schools evi Bus n Garage erica o e� G�11 A co� . 0 I r' G is I air Edin y sign Pe�� Hospital; r I Eden RAINBOV FOODS 0 66,000 SF. I 0 Of TSC co Office ; v o Playground Eden Circle , I.� Office/ Narehouse I SITE DATA ii I en AR A tan Ac) 357.530 SF cal"RaAL 66,000 SF GFA J - -- RESTAURANT 4.800 SF GFA Eden moor TOTAL BULLING AREA 701 SF CFA - - -- -- FLOOR AREA RATIO .20 FAR PAR19NG PRO\ED RAP60V FOODS 347 SPACES (J) RESTAURANT 80 SPACES r+ TOTAL PAFMG PROI 427 SPACES -- - - - --- OVtRAI.L PARIWG RATIO 6603/1000 SF WATSON CENTERS, INC. Preliminary M NORTH & RAINBOW FOODS Development 40' 188• EDINA, MINNESOTA I Site Plan I March 31, 1993 WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 16 each with one small and two large loading berths — to serve the Rainbow Foods Store. One loading area is located on a rear building wall facing toward the southeast away from the residential neighborhood to the south. This loading area which faces the Our Lady Of Grace Catholic School will be screened by the Soo Line Railroad, existing woods to the east and by landscaping added between the rail line and the loading area. The second loading area is located on the southwest corner of the proposed building. This loading area faces to the south toward the Eden Circle Office Warehouse parking lot and north facing loading docks. This loading area will share a service drive with the Eden Circle loading area. This Rainbow Foods loading area will be screened by the addition of landscaping between Eden Circle and the loading area and along the west side of the loading berths. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING The zoning ordinance requires that all open areas that are not used for parking areas, drives or storage are to be landscaped. The minimum number of trees required is determined by dividing the site perimeter by 40. The site perimeter for this project is approximately 2940 feet long which requires that 74 overstory trees be added to the site — less any credit for the existing trees to be retained in the southern part of the site. The landscape plan will be prepared during the final development plan phase. The trash storage facilities will located along the southeast facade of the building. They will be screened from all lot lines and public roadways by a combination of wall enclosures and landscaping as appropriate. All surface and roof mechanical equipment will be screened from all lot lines and public roadways by appropriate landscaping or architectural enclosures. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. An existing concrete sidewalk extends along Sherwood Road and Eden Avenue to the Lewis Engineering property. The proposed development will include a new concrete sidewalk along the entire northern frontage of the site. SITE DRAINAGE The site grading and drainage will be fully addressed during the final development plan stage. It is anticipated that because of the west to east direction of the existing slopes, the site will be graded to drain toward the railroad right -of -way. The surface runoff will be captured in catch basins at appropriate locations and piped to the 21 -inch RCP storm line in Eden Avenue. .o 0 Oo v 0 a� ' Eden 0 A OF zz 01 co Clinic Edina Wash Schools Bus ,per Garage j nenca ��/r I RR I tj TSC Office �`�'� Playground `.,'' O 4 011110"01 RAINBOW FOODS 66,000 SF. Eden Cycle Office/ Warehouse ;a `r4` LANDSCAPE KEY O UNDERSTORY TREE (73) EVERGREEN TREE (17) ® OVERSTORY TREE (57) WATSON CENTERS, INC. Preliminary O NORTH & RAINBOW FOODS Development 0• 40' 180• EDINA, MINNESOTA Concept March 31, 1993 WATSON CENTERS, INC. / RAINBOW FOODS 31 March 1993 Page 17 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Considering the nature of the industrial uses that operated on the properties for so many years, concerns were raised regarding the possibility of soil / ground water contamination. To address these concerns, Stage I and Stage II environmental audits were conducted by Twin City Testing in March 1990. These audits detected no contamination in any of the eight soil borings. The audits also confirmed the presence of three underground fuel storage tanks and indicated that none were leaking. All underground storage tanks will be removed as part of this development. CONCLUSION Based on the findings of the traffic and market studies prepared for this site and on the information presented in this summary, Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods are convinced that the development of a Rainbow Foods Store and family oriented quick service restaurant on this property will satisfy a community need and be an appropriate and valuable reuse of this site. o ei 7 � H sir O • � ~R)NIOM•vO • a.• REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: APRIL 19, 1993 Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -5 AN ORDINANCE A!•,_ENDING SEC- TION 1200 AND SECTION 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON PUBLIC SIDE- WALKS Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 1993 -5. Info/Background- Agenda Item # ITT. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion The City Council considered this proposed Ordinance Amendment at the April 5, 1993, City Council meeting. After reviewing the draft ordinance, the Council directed several revisions which have now been included in the attached Ordinance Amendment. The City Council also discussed charging a fee for the issuance of a permit. Staff has determined that the Health Department already charges a fee of $120.00 per year for a push cart. Staff believes that this fee should adequately cover the cost incurred by the City, therefore no additional fee is recommended. ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND SECTION 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS IN THE 50TH AND FRANCE COMMERCIAL AREA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 1200.02 is amended by adding a new paragraph as follows: "P. Pushcarts as defined in Section 720 of this Code placed on sidewalks and public walkways within the area included in the plan prepared by the HRA entitled "50th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to Subsection 1230.02 of this Code." Section 2. Paragraph R of Subsection 1230.02 is amended as follows: "R. Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy a street to sell -any farm produce or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling of services. The prohibition in this paragraph shall not apply to the sale of food and beverages from pushcarts, as defined by Section 720 of this Code, located on sidewalks and other public walkways within the area included in the plan prepared by the HRA entitled, "50th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to this paragraph. 1) In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued for a pushcart unless the following requirements are met: a. The pxjshcart must be licensed in accordance with Section 720 of this Code. b. The applicant for a permit must possess a valid food establishment license or take -out food license, pursuant to Section 720 of this Code, for a food establishment located in the 50th and France commercial area. c. The pushcart shall not exceed 8 feet in length, 4 feet in width, and 8 feet in height. d. The pushcart shall be equipped with casters or wheels to permit ease of movement. e. The pushcart shall be equipped with facilities for the disposal of trash generated by the pushcart. 2) In addition to the requirements of Section 720 of this Code, the following requirements shall apply to the operation of pushcarts: a. Pushcarts shall be parked on public sidewalks and walkways only in those locations specified in the permit. b. Pushcarts shall be stored indoors following the close of business each day. c. Only food or beverages for immediate consumption may be offered from the pushcart. d. Cleaning, servicing, and maintenance of the pushcart shall be undertaken only in an area approved by the Sanitarian. 3) Permits issued pursuant to this paragraph shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor /4 4j�/�1�1r o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: APRIL 19, 1993 Subject: ORDINANCE 1993 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTI 220 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 1993 -6. Info /Background: Agenda Item # I I I . B . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Attached is a letter from Mr. Norman Pink of American Amusement Arcades which explains that they are attempting to locate a combination restaurant /amusement arcade in Centennial Lakes Plaza. After reviewing the City Code, Mr. Pink has concluded that some of the amusement machines that would be operated in the arcade do not comply with present Ordinance requirements. In particular, Section 220.11 of the Code states the following: No person shall keep, maintain, sell or permit to be operated in the licensed premises, any machine which has been converted into an automatic pay -off device which shall discharge coins, checks, or other tokens to the operator or player of such machine. No person shall convert any machine into an automatic pay -off device. R Report /Recommendation Ordination NO. 1993 -6 April 19, 1993 Page two This Ordinance provision effectively prohibits machines that dispense coupons or tickets that can later be redeemed for prizes. Ordinance No. 1993 -6, would permit the issuance of coupons or tickets from a machine, subject to certain limitations. In particular, coupons or tickets that are dispensed as a prize or a reward, could not have a value greater than the cost of playing or operating the amusement machine. For example, if the amusement machine cost $.25 to play, then the value of the coupons or tickets that would be dispensed could not exceed $.25 in value. Staff believes that this language would accommodate the use being proposed without compromising past City positions concerning gambling or games of chance. ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 220 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 220.11 is amended to read as follows: "220.11 Automatic Pay -Off. No person shall keep, maintain, sell, or permit to be operated any machine which discharges money, checks, tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other thing of value which has a value greater than the cost to play or operate the machine." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor b4 /lb /y3 1G:3b ••- CITY OF EDINA to 002 "USEMENTARC"ES m9nneap0li$ MN55427 April 16, 1993 Mr. Gordon Hughes Assistant City Manager City of Edina 5801-W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Edina Ordinance No. 1993 -6 Dear Mr. Hughes: (612) 544 -5050 Pursuant to our conversation of this morning, I am sending you a brief background of our company and our hopeful in- volvment in the Centenia.l Lakes business complex. Our company has been in the amusement machines business for over 70 years, we operated the first indoor amusement center in the country, when we placed a few kiddie rides and novelty games in the "zoo" area of the original Southdale'Center. Our concept and operation has expanded from one amusement area in Southdale 27 years ago to 25 regional and strip shopping centers where we operate Piccadilly Circus and Circus Pizza. we plan to open our seventh Circus Pizza in the former Odegard book store. This unit will be a brightly lit two story complex with a state of the art animated stage show and seating for over two hundred patrons. Circus Pizza has been known as the place of choice for birthday parties for 13 years. Although our average birthday party customer is 6.7 years old, we have had surprise 50th. Anniversary parties and several 75th birthday parties, we also host many park and recreational team banquets. Every year D.A.R.E., "Make a Wish" and Courage Center hosts a large party in our Brooklyn Park location. We are extremely excited about our new location and look forward to a long association with the City of Edina and its residents. We have a concern about your ordinance relating to the awarding of prizes through the playing of skill amusement devices. As you may know, one of the features of Circus b4 /!ti /y3 id:30 -•• CITY OF EVINA Lo 003 April 16, 1993 Page 2 Pizza is the ability of our young and old customers to win prizes. They "purchase" these prizes with Li.ckets that they win from your skeeball, basketball, baseball toss and other games of skill . These prizes range from a "3 pack" of crayons to an official size leather soccer ball.. The change in your ordinance 4220.11 allows us to be able to dispense prize tickets based one, one's score on the games of skill . These tickets may not have a value greaten than the cost to Play or operate the machine." MinnesoLa Statue prevents the operations of anything but games of skill. Therefore your ordinance coupled with Minnesota law will prevent the ability of anyone to use these or any games as gambling devices. we support your ordinance and Lbank you for your endeavor to Prevent potential problems with the ticket redemption games of skill. If there is any information that you may need, or if I may be of any help to you whatsoever, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again I want to thank you and your staff for your support. We look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, American Amusement Arcades Norman. Pink NP /wjs A. a I es Cr City of Edina April 22, 1993 Mr. Tim Murphy Murphy Automotive 5100 Vernon Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Re: 5229 Eden Avenue Dear Tim: This letter is written to confirm your appearance before the City Council on April 19, 1993, and to serve as a record of their action. At that meeting you informed the Council that you have signed a lease and were using the subject property as an auto repair facility while your facility was being rebuilt. The Council was informed by City Staff that auto repair is not a permitted use in the Industrial District. After hearing your testimony and that of City Staff the Council voted to order you to vacate the property within 90 days. The 90 day period shall begin on April 20, 1993. Please call me at 927 -8861 if you have any questions concerning this order. Si cere�lly, Craig iar"'sen City Planner CL /jh City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 A. Ail „ s,10) REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO:. Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA:_ Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 16 April, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V. A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing & Painting Company Contract 93 -1 Amount of Quote or &d G & M Painting Ent., Inc. $ 194,360.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR EID: Reject bid. GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid for the cleaning, repairing and painting of the Southdale Water Tower is much higher than the engineer's estimate of $153,875.00. This bid should be rejected because it is not within budget. J Sign'dtu . The Recommended bid is Public Works - Engineering Department i within budget not within;dgq TIM Finance Director Manager 91�A. Arles ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE April 13, 1993 AGENDA ITEM y . B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Office Furniture for Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Facility Systems_, Inc. 1.$5,935.65 2. (State Bid) 2. 3. 3 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Facility Systems, Inc., 5,935.65 GENERAL INFORMATION: Purchase of Herman - Miller Office Furniture for expansion of the Pro Shop at Braemar Golf Course„ Administrative Offices, Assistant. Manager's Office, and Head Golf Pro's Office The Recommended bid is Y within budget not Kenneth Roslanld. City Director X' -4A.. rl 7 N' REQUEST � FOR PURCHASE HrJ.� ry: TO: Mayor and City Council FROM. Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 5 000 DATE April 14, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Portable Radios (6) Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Bear Communications, Inc. 1. $6,280.81 2. Motorola State Fire Consortium Bid 2, $6,728.08 3. 3. 4. 4.. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bear Communications, Inc. $6,280.81 GENERAL INFORMATION: Request for purchase of 6 portable radios. We are presently operating with a shortage of radios. The radios are either worn out, damaged or riot repairable. Replacement is critical at this time for maintaining on -scene emergency communications. Typically Ye replace 3--6 units per year. FIRE Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not within�udge J n W1,, IOA� Finqin"_(c� Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager X-4 A. Al L ° N o ; REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO. Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: April 14, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fire fighting turn -out gear (10 sets) Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Front Line Plus Fire & Rescue 1. $7,891.60 2. Smeal Fire Equipment Company 2. $8,399.60 3. Minnesota Conway Fire and Safety 3, $8,481.66 4. Jefferson Fire & Safety, Inc. 4. $8,434.80 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Front Line P1us.Fire & Rescue $7,891.60 GENERAL INFORMATION: Request for purchase of fire fighting turn -out gear (10 sets). Several firefighters' turn -out gear is not suitable for continued use. Replacement is important at this time before the personal ..protective gear becomes unsafe, as well as to meet minimum safety requirements. Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not FIRE Department , Kenneth Rosland, City Wallin, F�nce Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON . L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: APRIL 19, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: HARVESTING OF MILL POND Company 1 AQUATIC HARVESTERS 2• AQUATIC HARVESTER SPECIALTIES 3• MIDWEST AQUA CARE 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Amount of Quote. or Bid 1 $5,776.00 2• 5,990.00 3. 6,000.00 4. 5. AQUATIC HARVESTERS GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is for the annual harvesting of aquatic weeds in the Mill Pond The Recommended bid is -A within budget not within ADMINISTRATION Finance Director MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE APRIL 13, 1993 9:00 A.M. Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Leonard Kleven Robert Sherman Alison Fuhr VI. (A) OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Shirley Grotting, 5322 Malibu Drive Ms. Karen Owen, 6621 Limerick Lane Ms. Marcelle Triantafyllou, 6620 Limerick Lane Mr. Martin Ciemia, 5613 Hillside Court Mr. Carl H. Johnson, Jr., 5624 West 66th Street STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Craig Swanson, City of Edina Mr. Eric Felton, Edina P.D. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Request for striping, stop lines, and a "STOP" sign for westbound West 66th Street at Tracy Avenue. Request made due to the observed "cutting of the comer' by northbound Tracy Avenue traffic turning to go westbound on West 66th Street. Request made by Mr. Martin Ciemia, 5613 Hillside Court. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson had observed the intersection and noted that the majority of cars do cut the comer at westbound West 66th Street at Tracy Avenue when uninhibited by other traffic. During morning rush hour, 83% of the traffic uses the route as a main line; that figure rises to 90% during evening rush hours. Mr. Swanson reported very few cars using West 66th Street, and EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 2 stated his belief that remedies offered by the requestor were appropriate. Mr. Hoffman clarified those remedies as follows: (1) Install "STOP" sign at westbound West 66th Street and Tracy Avenue; (2) install "STOP" bars on northbound Tracy Avenue; (3) install "STOP" bars on eastbound West 66th Street; and (4) use centerline striping to identify major turn movement on Tracy Avenue. According to Mr. Swanson, only one accident had been reported at the intersection during the past three years. Mr. Martin Ciemia of Hillside Court, who originally contacted the Committee on this issue, noted that there is indeed a problem when vehicles attempt to take the narrow turn at West 66th Street traveling west. He said that while the solutions he proposed wouldn't necessarily erase the problem, he thought they would help. Another area resident, Mr. Carl Johnson, stated that part of the problem is poor compliance with "STOP" signs, particularly for northbound Tracy Avenue traffic. Mr. Hughes moved to recommend installation of the following: (1) 'STOP" sign at westbound West 66th Street and Tracy Avenue; (2) 'STOP" bars on northbound Tracy Avenue: (3) 'STOP" bars on eastbound West 66th Street: and (4) centerline striping to identify major turn movement on Tracy Avenue. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Request to address safety concerns relating to speed and volume on Malibu Drive. Requests made by Ms. Kris Harrison, 5416 Malibu Drive, and Shirley Grotting, 5322 Malibu Drive. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson reported that Ms. Kris Harrison, a Malibu Drive resident, had contacted the Committee because of her concerns that vehicles travelling from the south end of Malibu Drive were using excessive speed at the crest of the hill at Telemark Trail. According to Ms. Harrison, the hours of 4 -6 P.M. were particularly hazardous. Mr. Swanson had visited the area and noted that, while the sight line appears adequate, the combination of the hill, driver reaction time, and the unpredictability of children does present safety concerns. Results of radar surveys indicate an 85% speed level of 27 -29 miles per hour for northbound morning rush hour traffic, and 38 miles per hour during the 3:30- 4:30 P.M. time period. Mr. Swanson reported the Traffic Enforcement Unit had recently logged 5% hours of enforcement on Malibu Drive, resulting in three speeding citations and four speeding warnings. He also noted that 85% of all traffic is local (from Malibu Drive itself and the Parkwood Knolls area). Only one citation had been issued to someone who did not live or work in the area. Regarding accident history, Mr. Swanson stated that no accidents had been reported on Malibu Drive over the past three years. It was Mr. Swanson's recommendation that speed limit advisory signage be posted on Malibu Drive EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 3 near the water tower, and possibly further south of that location. Mr. Hoffman asked if this situation could be characterized as a neighborhood problem, and not an outside issue. Mr. Swanson said yes, and recommended sending a communique to residents in the area, over the signature of the Committee chairman, alerting residents to the speed problem. Mr. Hoffman agreed, noting his belief that the solution at this time was installation of additional speed advisory signs, additional enforcement, and communication with residents. Ms. Shirley Grotting, a Malibu Drive resident, appeared before the Committee. She expressed her surprise that local residents were largely responsible for the speed problem, and noted that traffic on Malibu Drive has doubled since the street was opened into Highway 169. Mr. Kleven moved to recommend: (1) installation of 30 mile - per -hour speed limit advisory signage on both directions of Malibu Drive: (2) distribution of a letter to area residents from the Traffic Safety Committee, signed by the chairman, advising them of traffic safety concems: and (3) continued speed enforcement on Malibu Drive. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (3) Request for "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the north and west side of Sherwood Road from near Link Road to Richwood Drive. Request made by Mr. Ron Cohen, 5213 Richwood Drive and Officer Limbeck of the Edina Police Department. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson reported that temporary "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signage had been installed on Sherwood Road last winter. The signs have since been removed, and no work order exists to have permanent signage installed. Mr. Hughes moved to recommend installation of "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the north and west side of Sherwood Road from near Link Road to Richwood Drive. Mr. Kleven seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. [Mr. Sherman had been called from the meeting previously, thus the discrepancy in the vote total] SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. (1) Request for the installation of a "STOP" sign to control speed on Ridgeview Drive at Duggan Plaza. Request made by neighborhood petition organized by Libby Pastor, 6812 Ridgeview Drive. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 4 ACTION TAKEN: Although Mr. Swanson had spoken with Ms. Pastor the previous Friday to suggest she or a representative attend the Traffic Safety Committee meeting, no one from the neighborhood was in attendance. Regarding accident history in the area, Mr. Swanson noted that three accidents had been reported over the last three years. Only one resulted in a written report; that accident occurred on Meadow Ridge and Ridgeview Drive, and was the result of snowy weather. Mr. Swanson reported the results of three speed surveys undertaken at the intersection: Time of Survey Northbound 85% Southbound 85% 7:00 A.M. -8:00 A.M. 28 27 8:00 A.M. -9:00 A.M. 32 32 3:15 P.M. -4:15 P.M. 33 30 Mr. Swanson noted that the roadway surface on Ridgeview Drive is similar to that on Tracy Avenue; the cars bump and make more noise, giving the impression of higher speed. He stated that a "STOP" sign would not be warranted in terms of accidents and speed, and that the roadway exhibited a lower- than - anticipated volume (less than 1,000 vehicles per day). Mr. Hughes asked whether Ridgeview Drive traffic is stopped at other locations, and whether other streets intersecting with Ridgeview Drive are stopped. Mr. Swanson answered yes to both questions. Mr. Kleven moved to recommend denial of the request for a multi -way "STOP" siqn at Ridgeview Drive and Duggan Plaza, due to lack of warrants. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Request for child warning signs on Hansen Road, 5656 Woodcrest Drive, Limerick Lane, and West 55th Street at Drew Avenue. The Committee will discuss a standard for installation of such signs. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman opened the discussion by noting the question of child warning signs is a general problem often raised at this time of year. Mr. Karen Owen, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 5 of 6621 Limerick Lane, addressed the Committee with her concerns; namely that a number of children have moved into the neighborhood during the past 8- 9 months, and that motorists who don't realize the presence of children are travelling too quickly. She noted that student drivers from the nearby Esse Driving School practice parallel parking on Limerick Lane during the summer, causing an additional hazard for children. Mr. Hoffman asked Mr. Swanson whether any warning signage was present near Heights Park or Birchcrest Park, and Mr. Swanson stated there was not. Mr. Hoffman reminded those in attendance that some 240 "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs had been removed from Edina approximately 18 years ago. At that time, they were deemed ineffective, and so common they almost became "invisible." He wondered if there was a way to identify some type of effective signage, and asked the residents present if they would consider Limerick Lane a typical neighborhood street. Ms. Owen agreed that Limerick Lane could be considered typical. Mr. Hoffman raised the issue of the Driving School. Ms. Triantafyllou, also of Limerick Lane, stated that drivers practice on Limerick Lane at least every other day during the summer, and both residents thought that constituted a hazard. Mr. Kleven asked whether Heights Park contained a play area for toddlers, and Ms. Triantafyllou answered yes. Mr. Kleven stated his belief that the presence of a nearby park separated this request from others, and that because of park activity, he would recommend some sort of warning signage. Mr. Hoffman questioned whether park areas should be looked at separately from other areas when discussing child warning signage. Concerning the request from Hansen Road, Mr. Swanson reported that no advisory signage is in place along the entire length of the street, and that he had been contacted regarding the possibility of speed advisory signs or "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs. Regarding Woodcrest Drive , Mr. Swanson noted that "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs had been requested there also because of 6 -8 new children in the neighborhood and the presence of a bus stop at 5656 Woodcrest Drive. Mr. Hoffman felt the Committee had identified two separate circumstances regarding warning signage; signage approaching a park, and signage in non -park areas. He stated he would not be opposed to developing a park approach policy. Mr. Hughes inquired if child signs that relate to a park should be reserved for collector streets (such as West 56th Street at Pamela Park and Hansen Road at Garden Park). Mr. Kleven noted studies which suggest child warning signs create a false sense of security in children; they read them and begin thinking "the drivers have to watch out for me." He stated that unless a unique situation exists (such as school zone or other large gathering of children) the potential for over - signing exists, and these types of sign request should not be approved. Mr. Sherman moved to defer the issue for an additional month, pending a park review. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. Following the vote, Mr. Hoffman directed Mr. Swanson to meet with Park EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 6 Department staff to solicit their input on systems that they have found to be effective. Mr. Kleven asked that the study indicate whether sidewalks exist in the park area. Mr. Hoffman stated that the City will speak with Esse Driving School concerning student drivers practicing on Limerick Lane. (2) Hennepin County Response to France Avenue signalization at T.H. 62 and at West 58th Street. ACTION TAKEN: This issue had been discussed most recently at the February Traffic Safety Committee meeting. At that time, the Committee voted to once again refer the matter to Hennepin County. The main concern with the intersection relates to an increasing frequency of accidents involving vehicles making left turns in front of on- coming traffic. One option suggested was the installation of "LEFT TURN ON ARROW ONLY" signage. Patrick Murphy, Hennepin County P.E. Director, responding with a letter indicating that unless a new bridge is built incorporating pedestrian facilities on, both sides, the County plans to retain the current signal operation. Mr. Hughes suggested two options remain for the Committee; either accept the letter, or ask the City Council to address a letter of its own to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting improvements to the T.H. 62 /France Avenue intersection. Mr. Hughes moved that the Traffic Safety Committee send a letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting a review of the T.H. 62 /France Avenue intersection. Mr. Kleven seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (3) Discuss the April 17, 1993, Strategic Planning presentation on the function and composition of the Traffic Safety Committee. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson distributed copies of the proposal he planned to present to the City Council at its April 17, 1993, Strategic Planning meeting. His plan concerned reorganization of the methods in which traffic safety issues are handled, and creation of standard policies to aid in the resolution of citizen traffic safety requests. (4) Discuss highway metering at the entrance from Eden Avenue to southbound Highway 100. Unscheduled agenda item requested by Gordon Hughes, Traffic Safety Committee. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Page 7 ACTION TAKEN: This issue had last come before the Committee in September of 1990. At that time, MN DOT had been requested to review the southbound ramp from Eden Avenue to Highway 100 with consideration as to widening the ramp to allow two parallel lanes to merge into one farther down the ramp. Mr. Hughes suggested that metering provides a possible solution to the problem. With metering in place, traffic is now stopped in two lanes at the meter (traffic from Eden Avenue on the right, traffic from West 50th Street on the left), creating a natural meeting point. Mr. Hughes said he would like to see the ramp metering in effect 24 hours a day, with striping and signage that keeps the Eden Avenue traffic to the right. He noted that the. ramp may have to be widened somewhat north of the signal to allow for two striped lanes. Mr. Hoffman requested that Mr. Swanson arrange a meeting between the City, the Traffic Management Center, and Metro District 5 to discuss the issue. Edina Traffic Safety Committee A. Cn O • f "y�bRPOMti�V lees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: APRIL 16, 1993 Subject: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE MICK'S AT SOUTHDALE, INC, i Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.B Consent Information Only L II Mgr. Recommends x To HRA To Council Action I Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Approval of issuance of an On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer License to Mick's at Southdale, Inc., 1656 Southdale Center. Info /Background: The City has received applications for an On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer License from Mick's at Southdale, Inc. This is a new restaurant to be located in Southdale Center opening the latter part of May. The applications have been reveiwed by the Police, Health and Planning Departments and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Memorandums are attached in support of issuance of the requested licenses. If the Council approves issuance of the licenses, the required documents will be sent to Minnesota Liquor Control for their approval of the On -Sale Wine License. CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: April 15, 1993 TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Leonard R. Kleven SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: Mick's at Southdale, Inc. 1127 Southdale Center Edina, MN 55435 The findings of this investigation does not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota, and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval. LEONARD R. KLEVEN CHIEF OF POLICE LRK:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: ELLIOTT MARSTON, ASSISTANT SANITARIAN L%y SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION - MICK'S AT SOUTHDALE DATE: APRIL 15, 1993 The application for an on -sale wine license submitted by Mick's at Southdale, a new restaurant at 1127 Southdale Center, has been reviewed by the Health Department. Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant will comply with the requirements of Code Section 900 with respect to seating capacity, food establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space which will not be adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved. M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER Na"_0000 FROM: C RAIG LARSEN, PLANNER - SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION - MICK'S AT SOUTHDALE DATE: APRIL 15, 1993 The application for an on -sale wine license, submitted by Mick's at Southdale, 1127 Southdale Center, has been reviewed by the Planning Department. The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend approval of the license application. O • r�RJRT(fM1/�•"�• a REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 16, 1993 Subject: Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for CDBG Funds Recommendation: Agenda Item # vI . c . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends (❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 7 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize Mayor and Manager to execute Agreement. Info /Background Our current Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County will expire September 30, 1993. The attached agreement will renew and extend the agreement until September 30, 1996. Minor language changes or clarifications have been made from previous agreements. In addition, new HUD language regarding the HOME Program and CDBG Program requirements are also reflected. Urban Hennepin County Contract No. A07483 Community Development Block Grant Program JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," A -2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55487, and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING UNIT," said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59: WITNESSETH: COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that COOPERATING UNIT share its authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained.in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that it: 1. May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and 2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County. I. DEFINITIONS The definitions contained in 42.USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them: A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.). B. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part 570. C. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. D. "Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County which has entered into a cooperation agreement which is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County which is a party to each Agreement. E. "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community Development Block Grant program. F. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant and HOME appropriations for the Federal Fiscal Years 1994, 1995 and 1996 and from -any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. III. AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 1993, and terminating no sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 1996, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the County for such period. COUNTY shall notify COOPERATING UNIT prior to the end of the Urban County qualification period that the Agreement will automatically be renewed unless it is terminated in writing by either party. Either COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT may exercise the option to terminate the Agreement at the end of the Urban County qualification period. If COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT fail to exercise that option, it will not have the opportunity to exercise that option until the end of a subsequent Urban County qualification period. COUNTY will notify the COOPERATING UNIT in writing of its right to elect to be excluded by the date specified by HUD in the Urban County Qualification Notice for the next qualification period. This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either party to adopt such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end of the program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of COUNTY as an Urban County under the Act. 2 This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the'Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than May 28, 1993. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the applicant's certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; and other applicable laws. IV.' ACTIVITIES COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out within the terms of this Agreement certain projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for funding under the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and /or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds pursuant to 24 CFR §570.300 et seq. COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows: A. COOPERATING UNIT will in accord with a COUNTY- established schedule prepare and provide to COUNTY, in a prescribed form, an annual request for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives. B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b) , it is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and in a'form prescribed by COUNTY. C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in paragraph B. above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to this.Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances a written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY. D. COOPERATING UNIT shall implement all activities funded for each annual program pursuant to this Agreement within Eighteen (18) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the basic grant amount. 3 1. Funds for all activities not implemented within Eighteen (18) months shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set. forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. 2. Implementation period extensions may be granted upon request in cases where the authorized activity has been initiated and /or subject of a binding contract to proceed. E. COOPERATING UNIT shall use funds provided pursuant to Section V. of this Agreement to the extent practicable to undertake no more than Three (3) grant- funded activities administered by the COOPERATING UNIT. Each activity shall have a budget of at least Seventy -five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00), or the total amount of the planning allocation of COOPERATING UNIT if less than Seventy -five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00). A COOPERATING UNIT may assign less than Seventy -five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) to an activity when the activity is one that is programmed by at least one other COOPERATING UNIT and administered by only one COOPERATING UNIT or the COUNTY on behalf of the others, provided that the total activity budget is at least Seventy -five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00). F. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to accomplish the community development program and housing assistance goals as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). G. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all programs and /or activities funded in part or in full by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall in implementing all programs and /or activities funded by the basic grant amount comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY. H. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities. I. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process as established by COUNTY in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. J. COOPERATING UNIT shall comply with all of the administrative guidelines of the COUNTY now in effect or as hereafter promulgated. K. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY. 4 L. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non - violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows: A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies on an annual basis all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the Act. B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of the request for funding. C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and housing assistance goals. D. COUNTY shall upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT agree to administer local housing rehabilitation grant programs funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive Twelve percent (12 %) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity. E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer for a possible fee other programs and /or activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination' of program administration, develop and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY. V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as follows: A. COUNTY shall retain Ten percent (10 %) of the annual basic grant amount for the undertaking of eligible activities. 5 B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be apportioned by COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C of this section for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to make requests for the use of funds so apportioned. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding. C. Each COOPERATING UNIT will use as a target for planning purposes an amount which bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between: 1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS. 2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS. ' 3., The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS. 4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice. D. - It is the intent of this section that said planning allocation utilize the same basic elements for allocation of funds as are set forth in 24 CFR §570.4. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data furnished by HUD. E. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request its planning allocation, or a portion thereof, the amount not requested shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. 1 VI. FINANCIAL MATTERS A. Reimbursement to the COOPERATING UNIT for expenditures for the implementation of activities funded under the Act shall be made upon receipt by the COUNTY of Summary of Project Disbursement form and Hennepin County Warrant Request, and supporting documentation. B. All funds received by COUNTY under the Act as reimbursement for payment to COOPERATING UNITS for expenditure of local funds for activities funded under the Act shall be deposited in the County Treasury. C. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the Act and Regulations. Such records and accounts will be in such form as to permit reports required of the County to be prepared therefrom and to permit the tracing of grant funds and program income to final expenditure. 6 D. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree to make available all records and accounts with respect to matters covered by this Agreement at all reasonable times to their respective personnel and duly authorized federal officials. Such records shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of program income resulting from activity implementation. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall perform all audits as may be required of the basic grant amount and resulting program income as required under the Act and Regulations. E. COOPERATING UNIT shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds it has received and shall pay to COUNTY all program income generated except as derived from activities with an approved revolving account. When program income is generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with CDBG funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the percentage of CDBG funds used. 1. COUNTY will retain Ten percent (10 %) of all program income paid to COUNTY to defray administration expenses. 2. The remaining Ninety percent (90 %) of the program income paid to COUNTY shall be credited to the grant authority of COOPERATING UNIT whose project generated the program income and shall be used for fundable and eligible CDBG activities consistent with this Agreement. 3. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY are authorized to retain program income derived from projects with an approved revolving account provided such income is used only for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements as they may apply. 4. COOPERATING UNIT shall maintain appropriate records and make reports to COUNTY as may be needed to enable COUNTY to monitor and report to HUD on the use of any program income. 5. Any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the closeout or change in status of COOPERATING UNIT shall be paid to COUNTY. F. Should an approved activity be determined 'to represent an ineligible expenditure of grant funds, the COOPERATING UNIT responsible shall reimburse the COUNTY for such ineligible expense. 1. All reimbursements for ineligible expenditures shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. 2. When it is determined by the COUNTY that grant funds have been expended on an eligible activity and through no fault of the COOPERATING UNIT the project fails or is no longer eligible, the 7 return of grant funds shall be reallocated in the same manner as program income in Section VI.E. of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise,by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. VII. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OR IMPROVEMENT The following provisions shall apply to real property acquired or improved in whole'or in part using CDBG funds. A. COOPERATING UNIT shall promptly notify COUNTY of any modification or change in the use of real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement including disposition and comply with 24 CFR §570.505. B. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non -CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations. Said reimbursement shall be provided to COUNTY at the time of sale or transfer of the property. Such reimbursement shall not be required if the conditions of 24 CFR §570.503(b)(8)(i) are met and satisfied. Fair market value shall be established by a current written appraisal by a qualified appraiser. COUNTY will have the option of requiring a second appraisal after review of the initial appraisal. C. Program income generated from the disposition or transfer of property prior to or subsequent to the closeout, change of status or termination of this Agreement shall be treated as stipulated in Section VI. E. of this Agreement. VIII. METROPOLITAN CITIES Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of Urban Hennepin County. I%. OPINION OF COUNSEL The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that the Agreement provides full legal authority for COUNTY to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. Assistant County Attorney 8 X. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Upon proper execution, this Agreement will be legally valid and binding. Assistant County Attorney Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Assistant County Attorney Date: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Chairman of its County Board And: Deputy /Associate County Administrator Attest: 9 Deputy County Auditor KI. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body having duly approved this Agreement on , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement, contract A07483 3/26/93 CITY OF By: Its And: _ Its Date: CITY MUST CHECK ONE: The City is organized pursuant to: Plan A Plan B Charter 10 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT COOPERATION AGREEK ENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina. Ninesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant and HONE Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and the County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to operate as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County by a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 1993, and that the Mayor and the Manager be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 1993. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 19, 1993, and as recorded in the Minutes of the Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this April 20, 1993. City Clerk r; w�1�11'ir 0 �nJRPOM�/ :uee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VII.A From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK I Consent x i Information Only Date: i APRIL 15, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PETITION FOR ALLEY PAVING n To Council XERXES AVENUE BETWEEN 6400 WEST 64TH STREET & Action Lx-1 i Motion i 6500 WEST 65TH STREET I i Resolution Ordinance I_ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition for alley paving between 6400 West 64th Street and 6500 West 65th Street to the Engineering Department for processing. Info /Background: The attached petition for alley paying was received from residents who live on the west side of Xerxes Avenue between 64th Street and 65th Street. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB .A-ND GUTTER DATE: a ,;�1 17 3 ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: <' _ [4 p K )Cy C- P-Li ;1 PV((JAi(- ?� To the Mayor and City Council: ' The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. XE 80(E S UX S I between e—i' Gand _ 6 ? T-N S r' ��C7 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NANIE and ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION MM OF !Nii'KOVENIENT BY STREET NAE ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE I _ This petition was circulated by: l IM iR I Rl�1iRFlC�C�I 6610k XCRXE S Ail(- •So 942a -6 91-7- NAME T— ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER iew ❑ SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ,� OTHER: (- 4P X166 SURFACING WITH P PI C ry\ P IZ I V Tt TO CURB AND GUTTER f'o SL 1, /4 To the Mayor and City Council: ' The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. )6E R X 6 S Sl bC- between C- 6-/ T H -ST- 6cpoand 6 S T-H SF- 6 �-00 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) P ONE �SIGNA This petition was circulated by: l Vh iR 1 A UT- AFIC_OCk 66109 ;E QX6S A0(z •Sa o,2A-6 fl- NA.IIE I ADDRESS ! PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1990 ❑ SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ,MOTHER: C_ 4p/ k G( SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER ,11 R I r A(, (�-v T o the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the + locations listed below. Y6 J� E A X C S U) 6- S T S-,1 tf,- u between G Ll T l T G�Lwand _6 5� T-N S r' 6 C00 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION'UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S T E R� OWNER'S NAME PROPERTYADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE This petition was circulated by: "T l M -1 R (R k) i A F I LQ(.k G� -10'� aCc RIC- _ A i )(, • S o q-21_ G RSl- NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER i9w ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ® OTHER: (' H I)Vc,( SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: F kc, v\ P i t LI A T L O Au( -Y The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. )(E R X E S UUE ST Sl Y,- between C� Ll T H -S • 69Wand G s T-H s r G X00 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAMME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NA,NIE between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE >�� OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS ( PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S PHONE i P 14-) LT e F i i ui,( i 24)- n , P Z lM ?'R 1RU i AF1L0Ck - J(E'�2XES AiX •Sa �7 5` NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMW -R 19W ❑ SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. XE k)(C S W X Sr -S� Y,- between (S g T l T 6 and 65� -rN S r' G �- LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE JAWW /u. IWjgRK 3�iaf- SAM 1 R 1 RUTAF 1 C Q(,k 66108 y6pXE� Ail(-- •Sa NAME T- ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMWR Casandra Mihalchick Litman 4610 Browndale Ave. Edina, Minnessota 55424 929 -2900 April 15, 1993 Re: Speed and Volume of Traffic on Browndale Ave. Safety Issues Dear Edina City Council Member: I have lived on Browndale Avenue with my husband and three small children for approximately seven years. During that time, I have noticed a significant increase in both the volume and speed of traffic on Browndale Avenue. I am concerned about these two issues as they relate to the safety of the area for both my children and other neighborhood children. Immediately in front of my home, on the west side of Browndale, is a school bus stop. A sloping hill running on Browndale near our home blocks the view for children crossing to get to the bus stop and across Browndale. I have personally witnessed many close calls of children almost being hit by cars as they attempt crossing the street. Additionally I refer you to Francis Hoffman who has recently commissioned a study that demonstrates the use of Browndale Avenue as a through -way for traffic. I realize that there is now a committee being formed to consider various alternatives of what to do regarding the Browndale Bridge but I implore you to put that aside and deal with the immediate problem of speed and volume of traffic on Browndale particularly between the hours of 7:30 -9:00 A.M. and 3:30 -6:00 P.M. Mr. Hoffman said it might take until 1995 before anything is done regarding the bridge. We can not wait that long to deal with the issues of speed and volume of traffic on Browndale Avenue. There are two quick and inexpensive methods to alleviate this problem. This should be done now and then further study of the Bridge issue could be continued. 1. Put up two red octagonal stop signs on the northern corners of Edgebrook and Browndale with cross walk lines painted in the street. 2. Immediately post signs prohibiting traffic from turning onto Browndale from 50th and the reverse, onto 50th from Browndale, between the hours of 7:00 -9:00 A.M. and 4:00 -6:00 P.M., Mondays through Fridays. This would stop the through traffic we get for people trying to avoid a bottlneck on Highway 100 or to cut through Country Club going to downtown Minneapolis. Page Two of 4/15/93 Letter to Edina City Council We, as a street and neighborhood, have repeatedly appeared before Traffic Safety Committee, presented signed petitions asking for additional stop signs, and been told it would be studied. This process is now in the second year of "being considered ". Meanwhile, our children are at risk for the nonaction of various people. WON'T SOMEONE HAVE THE COURAGE TO DO SOMETHING NOW? Please consider and immediately authorize the two solutions listed above as they would provide a safer street for the neighborhood children and still would not impair the ability hold hearings and contemplate what to do about the Browndale Bridge. Please call me if you need further information or if need to have testimony given regarding this matter. Sincerely, Casandra Mihalchick Litman Copy sent to Mr. Craig Swanson Traffic and Safety Committee City of Edina for dissemination to members of that Committee as LW you 5 COUNCIL DATE 4/19/93 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 1 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135238 04/19/93 $466.42 -AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $109.15 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $136.44 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $466.42 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $90.79 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $285.42 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $109.70 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $54.75 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $352.30 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOV- 04/19/93 $432.26 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $37.30 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $64.58 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $161.62 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $27.28 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193' GUN RANGE RUBBISH REMOV 04/19/93 $169.80 AAGARD RUBBISH REMOVAL 040193 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV < *> $2,964.23* 135239 04/19/93 $190.89 ACE SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 0232923 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6731 < *> $190.89* 135240 04/19/93 $315.00 ACME WINDOW CLEAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 005991 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPL 6817 < *> $315.00* 135241 04/19/93 $38.85 ACTION MESSENGER SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 106660 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQU < *> $38.85* 135242 04/19/93 $8.98 AIRSIGNAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 4660388 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCR < *> $8.98* 135243 04/19/93 $23.43 ALBINSON PRINTING 201471 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING < *> $23.43* 135244 04/19/93 '$79.22 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 032993 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $79.22* 135245 04/19/93 $88.38 ALLIED PLASTICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 33778 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 6518 < *> $88.38* 135246 04/19/93 $167.80 ALTERNATOR REBUILD SAFETY EQUIPMENT 009259 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 04/19/93 $485.64 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 09275 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $200.75 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 09283 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS < *> $854.19* 135247 04/19/93 $93.93 AMER. PHOTO COPY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 150884 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $93.93* 135248 04/19/93 $185.03 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $76.75 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $219.41 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH FIRE DEPT. .GEN LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $78.79 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH GRILL LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $44.42 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $12.46 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH LABORATORY, LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $60.84 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY MARCH YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY < *> $677.70* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 2 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135249 04/19/93 $261.90 AMERICAN PRESSURE IN REPAIR PARTS 14591 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 6322 135250 04/19/93 $156.38 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 031593 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE <*> $156.38* 135251 04/19/93 $1,111.33 ANCHOR PAPER GENERAL SUPPLIES 709860 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 6934 < *> $1,111.33* 135252 04/19/93 $35.00 ANDERSON, BARBARA KE REGISTRATION FEES 040693 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $35.00* 135253 04/19/93 $64,491.28 ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -IOPYM GC CIP CIP < *> $64,491.28* 135254 04/19/93 $35.00 ASSOCIATED PUBLIC SA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 75037/04 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR <*> $35.00* 135255 04/19/93 $87.62 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -95585 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6626 04/19/93 $106.07 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -95673 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6655 04/19/93 $111.28 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -95665 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 - $87.62 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -8308 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 - $315.19 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -8309 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $237.62 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -95755 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6681 04/19/93 $50.65 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS A -95778 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6729 < *> $190.43* 135256 04/19/93 $28.89 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 51980765 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 04/19/93 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 51982317 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $65.64* 135257 04/19/93 $13.65 AT &T CONS PROD DIV TELEPHONE 032693 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $19.01 AT &T CONS PROD DIV TELEPHONE 040293 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $32.66* 135258 04/19/93 $145.90 AUFDERWORLD CORPORAT GENERAL SUPPLIES 4837 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL 6344 < *> $145.90* 135259 04/19/93 $41.00 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 17810 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $41.00* 135260 04/19/93. $29.95 AWD COOLERS OF MINNE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 54108 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $29.95* 135261 04/19/93 $120.43 B & S INDUSTRIES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 67703 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6816 < *> $120.43* 135262 04/19/93 $102.28 BANKSYSTEMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 012782 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $102.28* 135263 04/19/93 $580.00 BARNARD ELECTRONICS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 0011934 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU 6265 < *> $580.00* 135264 04/19/93 $145.50 BARR ENG CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 16762 -18 GC CIP CIP < *> $145.50* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 3 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135265 04/19/93 $1,500.00 BARRY SIEWERT CREATI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 041193 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 7070 <*> $1,500.00* 135266 04/19/93 $448.66 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 244720 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6661 < *> $448.66* 135267 04/19/93 $399.38 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 015032 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 6854 04/19/93 $42.55 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 015034 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPL 6342 < *> $441.93* 135268 04/19/93 $100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135269 04/19/93 $216.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI MARCH *VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 04/19/93 $104.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI MARCH *50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQ 04/19/93 $230.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD LI MARCH *YO YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ < *> $550.50* 135270 04/19/93 $91.08 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 886946 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLI 6772 04/19/93 $5.44 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 883605 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $39.83 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 887342 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $3.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 88559261 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $17.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 888095 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $125.27 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 888089 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $42.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 888583 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $5.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 888728 ENGINEERING.GE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $465.19 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 889409 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $17.79 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 886215 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $813.89* 135271 04/19/93 $74.76 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 036928 CIVIL DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPL 6369 < *> $74.76* 135272 04/19/93 $4,625.39 BFI OF MN INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 93030010 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES < *> $4,625.39* 135273 04/19/93 $37,998.36 BFI RECYCLING SYS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 93030070 RECYCLING EQUIP RENTAL < *> $37,998.36* 135274 04/19/93 $499.99 BJ DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01181 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 7071 < *> $499.99* 135275 04/19/93 $400.00 BLAIN, JUDY AC INSTRUCTOR 041393 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $400.00* 135276 04/19/93 $100.00 BLOOD DAVID PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135277 04/19/93 $1,070.00 BLOOMINGTON HEATING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3400 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS < *> $1,070.00* 135278 04/19/93 $86.68 BLUMBERG PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES BM99674 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $86.68* 135279 04/19/93 $50.85 BONFE'S PLUMBING SER PLUMBING PERMITS 040693 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERM COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 4 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> , $50.85* 135280 04/19/93 $52.91 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 209842 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $341.68 BOYER TRUCKS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 82239 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6688 04/19/93 $499.55 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 81696 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6687 04/19/93 $12.41 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 211006 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6739 < *> $906.55* 135281 04/19/93 $238.25 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 040993 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPL < *> $238.25* 135282 04/19/93 $61.80 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 040793 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $186.92 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 040793 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLI 04/19/93 $85.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040793 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOL 04/19/93 $7.98 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 040793 GOLF ADMINISTR SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $341.70* 135283 04/19/93 $354.82 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 010047 GC CIP CIP < *> $354.82* 135284 04/19/93 $60.17 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 81135 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $21.35 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 82497 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL < *> $81.52* 135285 04/19/93 $589.92 BUREAU OF BUSINESS P TRAINING AIDS 8754244 TRAINING TRAINING AIDS 6583 < *> $589.92* 135286 04/19/93 $500.00 BURNS, STEVE HIGH SCHOOL SCORER /AR 040693 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER < *> $500.00* 135287 04/19/93 $100.00 BUTLER GEORGE PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135288 04/19/93 $5.33 CADY COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS 78646 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS < *> $5.33* 135289 04/19/93 $113.68 CALLAHAN,FRAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 040293 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $113:68* 135290 04/19/93 $15.08 CARLSON PRINTING SALES TAX 00056782 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $1,852.73 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 56965 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 6996 04/19/93 5246.44 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 57030 PARK ADMIN. PRINTING 7074 < *> $2,114.25* 135291 04/19/93 -$31.95 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 3036282 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6742 04/19/93 $166.67 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 312509 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6742 < *> $134.72* 135292 04/19/93 $31.95 CELLULAR ONE SERVICE ACCESSORIES 006141 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 04/19/93 $34.17 CELLULAR ONE SERVICE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 006668 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 04/19/93 $46.67 CELLULAR ONE SERVICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 007210 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $112.79* 135293 04/19/93 $38.14 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032293/P PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $74.64 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 032293/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL r COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 5 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135293 04/19/93 $103.46 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 032293/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $216.24* 135294 04/19/93 $343.44 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 44972. POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACE 5113 < *> $343.44* 135295 04/19/93 $171.18 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPL COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 16190 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GO FOO < *> $171.18* 135296 04/19/93 $260.00 CITY BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $64.00 CITY BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE < *> $324.00* 135297 04/19/93 $40.00 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040593 PWKS ADMIN GEN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $40.00* 135298 04/19/93 $66.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON PRINTING 041293 SPECIAL ACTIVI PRINTING < *> $66.00* 135299 04/19/93 $166.67 CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER 1052 50TH ST SELLIM ADVERT OTHER 04/19/93 $166.67 CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER 1052 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 04/19/93 $166.66 CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER 1052 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 04/19/93 $20.00 CITY OF EDINA MEETING EXPENSE 1051 COMMUNICATIONS MEETING EXPEN < *> $520.00* 135300 04/19/93 $43.71 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 022893 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $43.71* 135301 04/19/93 $246.20 CITYLINE ADVERTISING OTHER 1318 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER <*> $246.20* 135302 04/19/93 $1,080.00 CLEAN -FLO LAB PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6323 WEED CONTROL PROF SERVICES 04/19/93" $461.00 CLEAN -FLO LAB PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6327 WEED CONTROL PROF SERVICES < *> $1,541.00* 135303 04/19/93 $66.64 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50TH ST/ 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $539.90 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI YORK/ AP YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $268.15 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI VERNON/ VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $874.69* 135304 04/19/93 $150.75 COCKRIEL, VINCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040193 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $150.75* 135305 04/19/93 $67.10 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7495 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACE 6864 < *> $67.10* 135306 04/19/93 $197.32 COMPLETE BEVERAGE SE MEETING EXPENSE 8784 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPEN < *> $197.32* 135307 04/19/93 $340.62 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 698495 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPM 6624 < *> $340.62* 135308 04/19/93 $27.92 CONSTR FASTENING SYS TOOLS 18437 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS < *> $27.92* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 6 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135309 04/19/93 $3881.27* CONSTRUCTION MATERIA GENERAL SUPPLIES 009345 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPL 6502 135310 04/19/93 $147.50 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO COST OF GOODS SOLD F" ',09422 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6255 < *> $147.50* 135311 04/19/93 $33.08 CRAGUNS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040593 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOL 04/19/93 $33.08 CRAGUNS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS APRIL 5 COMMUNICATIONS CONF & SCHOOL < *> $66.16* w 135312 04/19/93 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS TIMOTHY J M PROFESSIONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $1,386.67* 135313 04/19/93 $45.00 CSI CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20482 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6525 04/19/93 $345.00 CSI CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20652 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 5761 < *> $390.00* 135314 04/19/93 $27.40 CULLIGAN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 033193 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICE < *> $27.40* 135315 04/19/93 $606.42 CURTIS 1000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 279001 0 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 7069 < *> $606.42* 135316 04/19/93 $12,441.00 DAVE PERKINS CONTRAC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 8691 GC CIP CIP < *> $12,441.00* 135317 04/19/93 $50.26 DAVE S FOOD WAGON COST OF GOODS SO[.!) FO 393 GRILL CST OF GD F00 < *> $50.26* 135318 04/19/93 $188.00 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. CU'.;! OF GOODS SOLD BE 95236 95 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE * * 135319 04/19/93 $61.20 DAY- TIMERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10309426 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLI < *> $61.20* 135320 04/19/93 $98.47 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01505 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6513 04/19/93 $100.84 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01512 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6005 < *> $199.31* 135321 04/19/93 $141.52 DELEGARD TOOL CO. REPAIR PARTS 25502 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6683 < *> $141.52* 135322 04/19/93 $283.94 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 26559 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 04/19/93 $80.94 DISPATCH.COMM /MN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 26560 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU < *> $364.88* 135323 04/19/93 $60.00 DONLEE INTERIORS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2628 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $60.00* 135324 04/19/93 $720.00* DORADUS CORP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 0930416 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQU 135325 04/19/93 $115.36 DORNSEIF, DAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041393 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $115.36* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 7 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------- 135326 04/19/93 $70.03 EAGLE ELEVATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6733 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $70.03* 135327 04/19/93 $297.52 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 676838 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $89.74 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 676843 YORK SELLING_ CST OF GDS MI < *> $387.26* 135328 04/19/93 $266.02 EARL F. ANDERSON LINE MARKING POWDER 122889 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POW 6963 < *> $266.02* 135329 04/19/93 $62.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $9,587.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $35.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $3,855.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $238.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $8,259.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $102.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /GC GRILL CST OF GDS BE < *> $22,140.50* 135330 04/19/93 $85.00 ECOLAS PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 2185386 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU 04/19/93 $100.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 2185382 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQU < *> $185.00* 135331 04/19/93 $240.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 97012 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $115.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 97002 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $23.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 97013 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $90.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 99538 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $338.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 99559 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $807.95* 135332 04/19/93 $200.00 EDINA ATHLETIC BOOST PRINTING 040693 PARK ADMIN. PRINTING < *> $200.00* 135333 04/19/93 $15.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM. MEETING EXPENSE 040793 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN < *> $15.00* 135334 04/19/93 $300.00 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB G ADVERTISING OTHER 040193 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $300.00* 135335 04/19/93 $608.00 EDINA FOUNDATION /EXP EDUCATION PROGRAMS 040993 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRG < *> $608.00* 135336 04/19/93 $108.00 EDINA HRA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040893 LIQUOR 50TH ST PROF SERVICES < *> $108.00* 135337 04/19/93 $3,123.41 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 041393 CDBG PROF SERVICES < *> $3,123.41* 135338 04/19/93 $23.70 ELECTRONIC DOOR LIFT REPAIR PARTS 69643 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6512 < *> $23.70* 135339 04/19/93 $105.44 ENVIRO -SENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1096 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPL < *> $105.44* 135340 04/19/93 $24.13 EQUITY TITLE OVERPMT /4925 INTERLAC 040893 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. 0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 8 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # . ----------------------------- < *> $24.13* 135341 04/19/93 $12.40 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES C09681 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $14.69 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES C09455 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $27.83 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO ADVERTISING OTHER 09629 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER < *> $54.92* 135342 04/19/93 $1,372.40 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPPL 10706 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT S < *> $1,372.40* 135343 04/19/93 $122.38 FELTON, ERIC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041393 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL 04/19/93 $56.29 FELTON, ERIC MEETING EXPENSE 041393 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPEN 04/19/93 $40.02 FELTON. ERIC MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041393 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 04/19/93 $124.62 FELTON, ERIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 041393 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $11.16 FELTON, ERIC PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 041393 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIE < "> $354.47* 135344 04/19/93 $25.00 FINE,AGNES SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 050293 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < "> 825.00" 135345 04/19/93 $11.41 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 83325 -05 GENERAL FD-PRO DUE FROM HRA 04/19/93 $15.73 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 83325 -05 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA <*> $27.14* 135346 04/19/93 $98.84 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/P ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $1,007.50 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/P GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $625.95 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $196.12 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $353.43 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/P EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $331.93 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 032693/P PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 04/19/93 $49.83 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 032693/C CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY < *> $2,663.60* 135347 04/19/93 $1,575.97 G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040593 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < *> $1,575.97* 135348 04/19/93 $122.13 GARDNER HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 2098 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 6494 < *> $122.13" 135349 04/19/93 $216.73 GARMENT GRAPHICS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 111854 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 6349 <*> $216.73" 135 350 04/19/93 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 040193 MAINT OF COURS DUES & SUBSCR $2 GCSAA 10.00" 135 351 04/19/93 $ GEM TAP SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 033193 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 47.00* 135352 04/19/93 $264.95 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 22790420 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 - $213.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 22683981 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $48.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 22798310 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 6853 < *> $99.95* 135353 04/19/93 $13.48 GENERAL SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 35979 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPL 6904 < *> $13.48* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 9 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135354 04/19/93 $50.00 GEREBI, LIZ SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 11/92 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00" 135355 04/19/93 $320.82 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMUNITION 23248 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 6716 04/19/93 $189.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS 23248 GUN RANGE TARGETS < *> $509.82* 135356 04/19/93 $6,817.20 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVA CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -IIPYM GC CIP CIP < *> $6,817.20* 135357 04/19/93 $155.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040593 COMMUNICATIONS CONF & SCHOOL 04/19/93 $155.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040593 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOL < *> $310.00* 135358 04/19/93 $228.20 GRAB -IT ENTERPRIZES GENERAL SUPPLIES 01590 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6812 < *> $228.20* 135359 04/19/93 $36,139.92 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSPITALIZATION 902223 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $36,139.92* 135360 04/19/93 $6,177.00 GRUBERS POWER EQUIP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16635 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACE 6393 04/19/93 $133.12 GRUBERS POWER EQUIP TOOLS 16747 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 6679 04/19/93 $529.30 GRUBERS POWER EQUIP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16771 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACE 6878 < *> $6,839.42* 135361 04/19/93 $71.25 GS DIRECT GENERAL SUPPLIES 31683 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 6855 < *> $71.25* 135362 04/19/93 $25.00 GUST, MARGARET SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 050693 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $25.00* 135363 04/19/93 $43.67 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 151087 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 6499 < *> $43.67* 135364 04/19/93 $30.00 HALVORSON, JIM LICENSES & PERMITS 040893 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $30.00* 135365 04/19/93 $16.00 HANCOCK, ELLEN DODD CLASS REFUND /ART CENT 041393 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $16.00* 135366 04/19/93 $157.10 HANS ROSACKER CO TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 5663 ED BUILDING & .TREES FLWR SH < *> $157.10* 135367 04/19/93 $60.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES EDINBOROUGH 050993 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $60.00* 135368 04/19/93 $601.00 HAUGEN & NIKOLAI P.A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18101 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 6759 < *> $601.00* 135369 04/19/93 $100.00 HED, CURTIS SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 050693 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 135370 04/19/93 $98.00 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE 041393 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 04/19/93 $17.50 HEDGES, DIANA GENERAL SUPPLIES /ART 041393 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $221.50 HEDGES, DIANA ART WORK SOLD 041393 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 10 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ---------------------------- <*> 5337.00* 135371 04/19/93 $223.50 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 032493 GRILL CST OF GD F00 < *> $223.50* 135372 04/19/93 $267.72 HENN CTY MED CENTER FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2364 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP < *> $267.72* 135373 04119/93 $80.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 040893 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR < *> $80.00" 135374 04/19/93 $34.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY.PUBL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MARCH CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES * * 135375 04/19/93 $138.60 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 22208 GC CIP CIP < *> $133.60* 135376 04/19/93 $4,604.19 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 001040 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRIS < *> $4,604.19* 135377 04/19/93 $107.85 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 035481 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $107.85* 135378 04/19/93 $00HILDRETH, ANN REFUND /PARK & REC 041393 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION 135379 04/19/93 $100.00" HOFFMAN- WILLIAM PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 135380 04/19/93 $190.36 HOLIDAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 350072 TREES & MAINTE GENERAL SUPPL 6446 < *> $190.36" 135381 04/19/93 $4.26 HOOTENS LAUNDRY 032293 POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY * * 135382 04/19/93 $829.75 HOPKINS PET KENNEL SERVICE 031393 ANIMAL CONTROL LEASE LINES < *> $829.75* 135383 04/19/93 $54.88 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS 212552 POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 6789 < *> $54.88* 135384 04/19/93 $643.50 HORWATH, TOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040693 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 04/19/93 $132.00 HORWATH, TOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040693 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES < *> $775.50" 135385 04/19/93 $13.00 HOULDING, DOROTHY REGISTRATION FEES 040893 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $13.00* 135386 04/19/93 $223.69 HYDRO SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 5666 METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPL 5382 04/19/93 $4,913.46 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER-METER 5689 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WAT 5382 04/19/93 $488.84 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER METER 5705 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WAT 5382 < *> $5,625.99* 135387 04/19/93 $105.00 IAAO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 762812 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCR 04/19/93 $60.00 IAAO GENERAL SUPPLIES 761655 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPL, COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 11 CHECK# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # < *> $165.00* 135388 04/19/93 $121.41 INDELCO CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 88827 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 6799 < *> $121.41* 135389 04/19/93 $235.26 INDUSTRIAL ARTS SUPP GENERAL SUPPLIES 022053 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 6725 < *> 5235.26* 135390 04/19/93 $9.62 - INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS 569130 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6651 < *> $9.62* 135391 04/19/93 $300.00 INTEC INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3163 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 7021 <*> $300.00* 135392 04/19/93 $2,530.21 INTERIOR COM SYS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2856 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACE 6708 < *> $2,530.21* 135393 04/19/93 $1,300.00 JAMES CONSTRUCTION C CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 041093 GC CIP CIP 6228 04/19/93 $1,200.00 JAMES CONSTRUCTION C CONSTR. IN PROGRESS APRIL 10 GC CIP CIP < *> $2,500.00" 135394 04/19/93 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135395 04/19/93 $40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE 041393 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $40.00* 135397 04/19/93 $33.11 JERRYS HARDWARE- PAINT 032593 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 04/19/93 $308.56 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $33.85 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $64.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $231.01 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $17.21 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $28.93 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $44.03 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $68.08 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $14.03 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $45.65 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $5.03 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 RECYCLING GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $8.20 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $25.52 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $20.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $1.07 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $22.10 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 032593 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL <*> $971.67* 135398 04/19/93 $17.06 JERRYS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 632593 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL < *> $17.06* 135399 04/19/93 $397.35 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 2309 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 6493 < *> $397.35* 135400 04/19/93 $15.00 JOHN HOPKINS MEDICAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 040893 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCR < *> $15.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 12 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135401 04/19/93 00JOHNSON WALTER PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES $100.00* 135402 04/19/93 $45.03 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 238899 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $17.03 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 238766 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $30.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 269399 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI < *> $92.06* 135403 04/19/93 $59.80 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE 041393 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 04/19/93 $50.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI ADVERTISING /ART CENTE 041393 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 04/19/93 $42.77 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES /ART 041393 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPL- <*> $152.57* 135404 04/19/93 $41.79 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 78870 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $66.17 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 95473 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6150 04/19/93 $350.42 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 97042 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6417 04/19/93 $45.05 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 98314 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6559 04/19/93 $152.51 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 98945 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6572 04/19/93 $80.51 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 99137 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6644 04/19/93 $129.58 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 995454 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6665 04/19/93 $334.84 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 397 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6751 04/19/93 $28.63 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 708 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6852 04/19/93 $132.98 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 99426 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 6702 < *> $1,362.48* 135405 04/19/93 $100.00 KrPRIOS, JOHN COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 040693 VANVALKENBURG CST OF GD FOO < *> $100.00* 135406 04/19/93 $208.69 KITSON, ROY OR GRACE AMBULANCE FEES 040793 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $208.69* 135407 04/19/93 $302.47 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 048994 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6439 04/19/93 $13.51 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 048996 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6439 04/19/93 $35.10 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 049127 CLUB HOUSE REPPTP PARTS 6346 04/19/93 $12.19 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 049110 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6840 04/19/93 $237.45 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 049869 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6522 04/19/93 $12.68 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 050184. BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 04/19/93 $26.08 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 050841 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6732 . < *> $639.48* 135408 04/19/93 $122.00 KNUTSON. KAREN AC INSTRUCTOR 041393 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $122.00* 135409 04/19/93 $139.18 KOKESH ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 70760 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $149.25 KOKESH ATHLETIC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 70999 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOO 6641 < *> $288.43* 135410 04/19/93 $1,000.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 CDBG PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $250.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 ART CENTER ADM PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $200.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK iROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 POOL ADMIN PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $1,050.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $900.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 ARE'7i' ADMINIST PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $200.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 GUN RANGE ADMI PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $1,000.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC AUDIT 04/19/93 $3,400.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 GENERAL(BILLIN PRO SVC AUDIT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 13 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135410 04/19/93 $1,000.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 41100 -11 GENERAL STORM PRO SVC AUDIT <*> $9,000.00* 135411 04/19/93 $43.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $2,628.05 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $3,899.10 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $114.50 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $6,685.60* 135412 04/19/93 $72.42 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR SOD & BLACK DIRT 900934. MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT < *> $72.42* 135413 04/19/93 $421.07 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1717498 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 6376 04/19/93 $287.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1717501 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 6385 04/19/93 $200.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1717501 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 6385 04/19/93 $102.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 1717500 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 6377 04/19/93 $280.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1917503 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 6387 04/19/93 $280.63 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1917499 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 6376 04/19/93 $271.69 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1924643 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 6600 04/19/93 $213.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1924644 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6601 04/19/93 $403.99 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1925324 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL 6599 < *> $2,461.43* 135414 04/19/93 $47.86 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 033193/G MAINT OF COORS LAUNDRY 04/19/93 $36.64 LEEF BROS. INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 033193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $84.50* 135415 04/19/93 $120.26 LIEN INFECTION CON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040193 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 04/19/93 $91.43 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 6339 GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQU < *> $211.69* 135416 04/19/93 $19.64 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 224941 COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE < *> $19.64* 135417 04/19/93 $958.50 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 669 FIELD MAINTENA EQUIP RENTAL 3457 < *> $958.50* 135418 04/19/93 $5,988.92 LYLE SIGNS INC. SIGNS & POSTS 34116 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5526 < *> $5,988.92* 135419 04/19/93 $12.74 LYNDALE HARDWARE PAINT 511659 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT < *> $12.74* 135420 04/19/93 $50.22 M & I IND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 03040 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6461 < *> $50.22* 135421 04/19/93 $160.96 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19335 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $140.88 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19346 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $364.32 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19372 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $511.82 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19510 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $181.04 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19520 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $442.08 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19546 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $1,801.10* 135422 04/19/93 $1,209.09 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 32772 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6649 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 14 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135422 04/19/93 -$6.34 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 32945 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6649 < *> $1,202.75* 135423 04/19/93 $76.72 MARGL, LINDA J MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041293 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $76.72* 135424 04/19/93 $164.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 022693 GRILL CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $168.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $4,623.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $266.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $8,248.34 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $6,327.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $199.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $310.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 033193 GRILL CST OF GDS BE < *> $20,307.49* 135425 04/19/93 $180.00 MASON CUTTERS REPAIR PARTS M2941M CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6815 04/19/93 $180.00 MASON CUTTERS REPAIR PARTS M3015 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6814 < *> $360.00* 13 426 04/19/93 $9 MCCAREN DESIGN TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 8865 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SH 7025 51.10 135427 04/19/93 $250.00 MCDOWELL, MARGARET AC INSTRUCTOR 041393 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $250.00* 135428 04/19/93 $303.91 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES O40193/G MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $121.47 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS O40193/P PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $214.33 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES O40193/P PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $265.19 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS O40193/P EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 04/19/93 $374.77 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY ACCESSORIES O40193/P EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 04/19/93 $318.87 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES O40193/P EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $2,507.61 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS O40193/P EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $4,106.15* 135429 04/19/93 $210.87 MCNEILUS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 0186038 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $168.06 MCNEILUS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 189124 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6528 04/19/93 - $140.74 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 0191936 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 6738 < *> $519.67* 135430 04/19/93 $100.00 MERFELD -BERT PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135431 04/19/93 $166.99 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 32770 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPP 6589 04/19/93 $198.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 32769 50TH ST OCCUPA REPAIR PARTS 6684 04/19/93 $163.58 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 32794 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6680 04/19/93 $947.85 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 32792 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 6489 04/19/93 $315.98 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 32797 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 04/19/93 $477.65 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 32798 SIDEWALKS & PA GENERAL SUPPL 6760 04/19/93 $497.88 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 32829 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPP 6724 04/19/93 $498.68 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 32862 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 6937 < *> $3,266.61* 135432 04/19/93 $73.92 MERWYN WALKER MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041993 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $73.92* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 15 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. & ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135433 04/19/93 $510.00 METRO SALES INC EQUIPMENT OPERATION 353445 GOLF ADMINISTR EQUIPMENT OPE < *> $510.00* 135434 04/19/93 $225,940.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE METRO 50500593 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC MET < *> $225,940.00* 135435 04/19/93 $20.28 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 032093 GRILL CST OF GD F00 04/19/93 $64.00 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 745055 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD F00 < *> $84.28* 135436 04/19/93 $49.00 METZGER AQUATIC ENGI SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU APRIL CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQU <*> $49.00* 135437 04/19/93 $50.00 MFSP FIRE PREVENTION 040793 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTI < *> $50.00* 135438 04/19/93 $185.41 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2540 GC CIP GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $1,036.04 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 2540 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP < *> $1,221.45* 135439 04/19/93 $14.65 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG REPAIR PARTS 062987 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6728 < *> $14.65* 135440 04/19/93 $443.24 MILTONA TURF PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 6012 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 6709 < *> $443.24* 135441 04/19/93 $74.39 MILWAUKEE TOOL CO. TOOLS 25 -47 -95 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS < *> $74.39* 135442 04/19/93 $141.73 MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 040193 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU < *> $141.73* 135443 04/19/93 $1,190.25 MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTI GENERAL SUPPLIES 027013 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6266 04/19/93 $1,106.17 MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTI REPAIR-PARTS 027648 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6467 < *> $2,296.42* 135444 04/19/93 $30.00 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041393 CDBG PROG CONF & SCHOOL < *> $30.00* 135445 04/19/93 $138.88 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQU REPAIR PARTS 5338 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 6808 < *> $138.88* 135446 04/19/93 $1,230.00 MINNESOTA POLLUTION LICENSES & PERMITS 1005960 GENERAL(BILLIN LIC & PERMITS < *> $1,230.00* 135447 04/19/93 $148.04 MITCHELL INTERNATION DATA PROCESSING 001642 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSI < *> $148.04* 135448 04/19/93 $1,803.20 MN DEPT OF GASOLINE MARCH EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $1,803.20* 135449 04/19/93 $35.00 MN RIVERLAND TECH CO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 102609 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $35.00* 135450 04/19/93 $140.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1229 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCR COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 16 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $140.00* 135451 04/19/93 $718.00 MN STATE TREA /BLG IN BUILDING PERMITS MARCH GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERM <*> $718.00* 135452 04/19/93 $55.86 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8398 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 04/19/93 $72.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8400 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 04/19/93 $14.40 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8401 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 04/19/93 $47.88 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8399 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 04/19/93 $79.20 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8402 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L 04/19/93 $18.72 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 8467 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L < *> $288.06* 135453 04/19/93 $499.30 MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $437.63 MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $180.83 MN. BAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH 50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI < *> $1,117.76* 135454 04/19/93 $559.13 MN. CONWAY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 24065 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACE 6537 <•> $559.13* 135455 04/19/93 $88.85 MN. GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 77988 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 6453 04/19/93 $251.83 MN. GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 78129 PU!!P & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL < *> $340.68* 135456 04/19/93 $274.09 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 318361 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $13.51 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 320780 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 - $98.12 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 320866 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $435.40 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 32 ^936 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6741 04/19/93 - $18.79 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 321.:6 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $11.36 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 32198 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6563 < *> $617.45* 135457 04/19/93 $10.33 MN. WANNER REPAIR PARTS 17550 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $10.33* 135458 04/19/93 $630.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 030487 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 6788 <*> $630.00* i 1(5459 04/19/93 $10.00 MRPA BOOKS & PHAMPHLETS 040693 PARK ADMIN BOOKS & PHAMP * * 135460 04/19/93 $3,912.00 MTS NW SOUND MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 108110 EDINB /CL PROG MACH. & EQUIP 1303 04/19/93 $68.89 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 112752 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $287.55 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 112789 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL < *> $4,268.44* 135461 04/19/93 $21.16 MUELLER SALES CORP REPAIR PARTS 01 -00248 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS <*> $21.16* 135462 04/19/93 $52.98 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 882027 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6730 < *> $52.98* 135463.04/19/93 $70.00 NATIONAL ENV. HEALTH DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 040693 PUBLIC HEALTH DUES & SUBSCR < *> $70.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 17 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7---------------- 135464 04/19/93 $232.38 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 581618 GC CIP CIP < *> $232.38* 135465 04/19/93 $102.82 NEBCO /L.L. DISTRIBUT COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 154040 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOO 9628 < *> $102.82* 135466 04/19/93 $100.00 NISSEN DICK PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA.PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135467 04/19/93 $137.03 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 529050 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6711 04/19/93 $112.24 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 527060 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6574 < *> $249.27* 135468 04/19/93 $53.77 NORTHERN AIRGAS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 13622 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP < *> $53.77* 135469 04/19/93 $121.64 NORTHERN REPAIR PARTS 145295TI MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6713 < *> $121.64* 135470 04/19/93 $160.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $124.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $42.96 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH 50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI < *> $327.96* 135472 04/19/93 $24.19 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $1,137.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $333.09 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $45.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $1,247.89 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 � $37.40 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $2,460.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $657.91 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $3,457.55 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $1,449.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $211.82 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $3,680. -41 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $477.51 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 GUN RANGE LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $1,031.06 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 PUMP & -LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $3,329.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER_ 04/19/93 $438.87 NSP LIGHT &'POWER 041993 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 04/19/93 $1,179.48 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041993 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER < *> $21,198.88* 135473 04/19/93 $153.45 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 205310 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6263 < *> $153.45* 135474.04/19/93 $6.57 OFFSET PRINTING SALES TAX 21692. ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPL < *> $6.57* 135475 04/19/93 $42.40 OLD DUTCH FOODS COST OF.GOODS SOLD FO 040293 GRILL CST OF GD FOO < *> $42.40* 135476 04/19/93 $209.27 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 134013 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6517 < *> $209.27* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 18 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # 135477 04/19/93 $250.00 OSSEO SENIOR HIGH SC RENTAL INCOME 041293 EDINB /CL PROG RENTAL INCOME < *> $250.00* 135478 04/19/93 $87.39 PAPER DEPOT COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 2692 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6252 < *> $87.39* 135479 04/19/93 $374.38 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 031393 GENERAL(BILLIN PHYS EXAMS 04/19/93 $404.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0313 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $778.38* 135480 04/19/93 $19.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30698 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $46.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30756 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI < *> $65.95* 135481 04/19/93 $155.40 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $104.45 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $53.95 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $516.47 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD FO MARCH /GC GRILL CST OF GD FOO < *> $830.27* 135482 04/19/93 $2,000.00 PETERSON MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS PR -031 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 6407 < *> $2,000.00* 135483 04/19/93 $488.00 PHYSIO CONTROL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 039770 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 5498 < *> $488.00* 135484 04/19/93 $321.42 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 12466 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 7077 < *> $321.42" 135485 04/19/93 $737.16 PLANT EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 14872 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 6686 * * 135486 04/19/93 $29.90 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 539893 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL < *> $29.90* 135487 04/19/93 $69.00 PMC SCHOOL & CONF /POLICE 040193 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL <!> $69.00* 135488 04/19/93 $34.00 POISSON DESIGN GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040493 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $34.00* 135489 04/19/93 $12,821.00 POLAR CHEVROLET. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PWI30485 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACE 5420 < *> $12,821.00* 135490 04/19/93 $00POSTMASTER POSTAGE 0413 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 135491 04/19/93 $720.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /ART CENTER 041293 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $720.00* 135492 04/19/93 $58.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /ART CENTER 041393 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $58.00* 135493 04/19/93 $1,262.02 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 32293 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 6065 < *> $1,262.02* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 19 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135494 04/19/93 $4,008.00 PRECISION DYNAMICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 220053 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPL 6411 < *> $4,008.00* 135495 04/19/93 $1,011.75 PRECISION LANDSCAPE CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 030393 SIX YR TREES CIP 04/19/93 $1,730.23 PRECISION LANDSCAPE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 030393 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $2,741.98* 135496 04/19/93 $37.18 PRENTICE HALL BOOKS & PHAMPHLETS 24008313 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PHAMP < *> 537.18* 135497 04/19/93 $404.00 PRESTO CLEANING SYST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0240 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 7012 < *> $404.00* 135498 04/19/93 $13.50 PRINTERS SERV INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 82188 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL < *> $13.50* 135499 04/19/93 $2,590.64 PRIOR LAKE AGG. SALT 031793 SNOW & ICE REM SALT < *> $2,590.64* 135500 04/19/93 $21.78 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 678608 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $21.78* 135501 04/19/93 $143.05 PUMP & SPRAY EQUIPME GENERAL SUPPLIES 13345 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL'6622 < *> $143.05* 135502 04/19/93 $90.35 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 47288 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6526 < *> $90.35* 135503 04/19/93 $79.71 QUIK PRINT OFFICE SUPPLIES 047275 GOLF DOME OFFICE SUPPLI 7011 < *> $79.71* 135504 04/19/93 $203.15 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 00244 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $237.80 RED WING SHOES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 00244 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPM 04/19/93 $349.35 RED WING SHOES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 00244 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $790.30* 135505 04/19/93 $276.62 REEDS SALES & SERV REPAIR PARTS 20172 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6634 < *> $276.62* 135506 04/19/93 $244.52 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3144 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL < *> $244.52* 135507 04/19/93 $9,615.40 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $29.00 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $31.30 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $5,791.83 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $202.25 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $8,164.20 REX DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $23,833.98* 135508 04/19/93 $160.68 RITEWAY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 150769 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQU 5803 04/19/93 $20.70 RITEWAY REPAIR PARTS 159504 -M EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6748 < *> $181.38* 135509 04/19/93 $386.98 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR PARTS 135060 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5963 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 20 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # -------------------------------------------------------------"----------------------------------------------------------------------- 135509 04/19/93 $212.45 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR PARTS 135250 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5963 < *> $599.43* 135510 04/19/93 $54.25 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 38116 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $400.00 ROBERT B..HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 52170 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 6851 < *> 132741 $454.25* Hunerberg Construction 04/19/93 $137,085.00 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 032693 GC CIP CIP < *> $137,085.00* 135512 04/19/93 $7.00 SANKEY, DIANE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041293 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOL 04/19/93 $30.00 SANKEY, DIANE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041293 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $37.00* 135513 04/19/93 $115.01 SEARS TOOLS SR -75 -67 ED BUILDING & TOOLS < *> $115.01* 135514 04/19/93 $20.00 SEDGWICK HEATING & A PLUMBING PERMITS 040993 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERM < *> $20.00* 135515 04/19/93 $100.00 SHEPARD JOHN PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135516 04/19/93 $52.74 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 0817 -0 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6614 04/19/93 $120.35 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4772 -0 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 6620 04/19/93 $266.10 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 1121 -6 ARENA BLDG /GRO PAINT 6590 . 04/19/93 $43.87 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 3017 -7 MAINT OF COURS PAINT 6710 04/19/93 530.20 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 3349 -4 MAINT OF COURS PAINT 6796 < *> $513.26* 135517 04/19/93 $151.78 SIGNAL SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 7475 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL 6997 < *> $151.78* 135518 04/19/93 $145.00 SILVER LAKE JACK CO REPAIR PARTS 8573 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $145.00* 135519 04/19/93 $665.18 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLW CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 597314 GC CIP CIP 5756 04/19/93 $665.18 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLW CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 597314 GC CIP CIP 04/19/93 $665.19 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLW LUMBER 597314 ENGINEERING GE LUMBER < *> $1,995.55* 135520 04/19/93 $2,400.00 SMITH, CATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EPMS9301 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 7020 < *> $2,400.00* 135521 04/19/93 $53.25 SOKKIA MEASURING SYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 105463 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $46.33 SOKKIA MEASURING SYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 105517 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 5108 < *> $99.58* 135522 04/19/93 $219.78 SOUTHHAM BUSINESS CO ADVERTISING LEGAL CPCO2424 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L < *> $219.78* 135523 04/19/93 $336.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $11,932.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH YO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $4,389.25 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MARCH 50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 04/19/93 $123.95 1 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MARCH 50 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 21 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $16,781.95* 135524 04/19/93 $463.22 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 121019 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPL 6558 < *> $463.22" 135525 04/19/93 $28.70 SPECTRUM SAFETY SAFETY EQUIPMENT EPK100 -1 POOL ADMIN SAFETY EQUIPM < *> 528.70* 135526 04/19/93 $361.31 SPS TOOLS 2010363 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 6202 04/19/93 $20.67 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2010355 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6457 04/19/93 $35.31 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2012256 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6498 04/19/93 $57.90 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2014014 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 6519 04/19/93 $26.50 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2014991 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6632 04/19/93 $67.01 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2015464 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 6659 04/19/93 $2.80 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2016289 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6685 04/19/93 $130.80 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2016287 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 6678 04/19/93 $120.57 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2018029 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 6745 04/19/93 $6.10 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2020819 BUILDING MAINTT REPAIR PARTS 6977 < *> $828.97* 135527 04/19/93 $78.00 STAR TRIBUNE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 031993 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCR 04/19/93 $651.04 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 033193 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSON 04/19/93 $855.00 STAR TRIBUNE PRINTING 033193 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING < "> $1,584.04* 135528 04/19/93 $124.27 STRETCHERS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 63672.1 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $124.27* 135529 04/19/93 $1,011.69 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0921752/ ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 04/19/93 $525.12 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0931826/ ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 04/19/93 $640.00 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0931817/ ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < "> $2,176.81* 135530 04/19/93 $25.36 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183051 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $629.01 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 155984 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6595 04/19/93 $80.67 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183163 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $6.24 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183450 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $27.16 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183433 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $96.64 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 156545 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $36.35 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183751 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $28.76 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183615 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $214.87 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 183830 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < "> $1,145.06* 135531 04/19/93 $318.30 SUBURBAN PROPANE GASOLINE 031793 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE < *> $318.30* 135532 04/19/93 $22.37 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 0130735 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $22.37* 135533 04/19/93 $94.01 SUPERIOR FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 126652 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $94.01" 135534 04/19/93 $5.99 SUPERIOR FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 126834 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $5.99* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 1 "11 page 22 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ---- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # --------------------------------- 135535 04/19/93 40SUSAN - - - - -- - FRAME -------------------I------------------------------------------- COST OF-GOODS SOLD FO 040293 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6868 $94.40A 135536 04/19/93 $100.00 SWANSON HAROLD PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135537 04/19/93 $1,257.67 SylzCO MN COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 040193 GRILL CST OF GO F00 < *> $1,257.67* 135538 04/19/93 $21.28 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 00437572 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $31.93 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 00437572 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $35.13 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 00437571 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $50.88 TARGET PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 00437573 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIE 6097 < *> $139.22* 135539 04/19/93 $2,309.00 TC MUSICIANS UNION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT 032493 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 6860 04/19/93 -$168.00 TC MUSICIANS UNION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT 041293 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $2,141.00* 135540 04/19/93 $202.93 TERRY ANN SALES. CO RANGE BALLS 1289 GOLF DOME RANGE BALLS 7010 * * 135541 04/19/93 $55.50 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4674626 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $55.50* 135542 04/19/93 $293.76 THE MATHISON CO COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 757451 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6251 < *> $293.76* 135543 04/19/93 $461.15 THE PRINT SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 21084 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 6532 < *> $461.15* 135544 04/19/93 $25.00 THE WINDOW ADVERTISING OTHER 178 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER < *> $25.00* 135545 04/19/93 $153.10 THERMAL CO REPAIR PARTS 2065073 VERNON OCCUPAN REPAIR PARTS 6667 < *> $153.10* 135546 04/19/93 $11,227.00 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 72185 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $11,227.00* 135547 04/19/93 $23.65 THORPE DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 033193 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 04/19/93 $4,563.45 THORPE DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 033193 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $4,587.10* 135548 04/19/93 $80.00 TOENSING, JAMES SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 041593 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $80.00* 135549 04/19/93 $49.00 TRANSPORT CLEARINGS CRAFT SUPPLIES 5385327 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE c *> $49.00* 135550 04/19/93 $448.60 TROY CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES MN5559 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $448.60* 135551 04/19/93 $134.32 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 17016 "PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6612 04/19/93 $343.21 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 17037 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS .,6818 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 23 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $477.53* 135552 04/19/93 $29.93 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 94564 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $29.93* 135553 04/19/93 $682.28 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 041293 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 04/19/93 $17.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 041293 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW < *> $699.28* 135554 04/19/93 $55.76 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67SI 229 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 6623 04/19/93 $296.18 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67SI 229 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6596 < *> $351.94* 135555 04/19/93 $162.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN REGISTRATION /FIRE 040893 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL <*> $162.00* 135557 04/19/93 $53.78 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 DARE TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $2,240.64 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $171.58 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $16.45 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $183.44 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $76.49 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $53.60 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $271.44 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $53.78 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $140.70 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $53.78 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 9278861 DARE TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $65.63 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 9278861 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $2,380.68 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 9278861 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $202.39 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $670.21 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $348.01 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $66.08 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $55.74 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $144.39 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ART CENTER ADM TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $16.06 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ART CENTER ADM TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $80.74 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $218.26 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $1.05 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 ART CENTER ADM TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $1.21 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 . ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $1.06 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 041993 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $181.54 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 0419 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $28.00 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 0419 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $89.96 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 0419 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 04/19/93 $67.38 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 0419 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE < *> $7,934.07* 135558 04/19/93 $414.82 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 453552 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE 6727 04/19/93 $19.17 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 453743 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE < *> $433.99* 135559 04/19/93 $99.30 VIKING SAFETY PRODUC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 488820 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 6831 04/19/93 $327.81 VIKING SAFETY PRODUC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 488901 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 6885 < *> $427.11* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:44 PM page 24 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 135560 04/19/93 $2,758.00 VOGT HEATING & AIR C PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9907 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $2,758.00* 135561 04/19/93 $182.75 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 221218 VERNON OCCUPAN REPAIR PARTS 04/19/93 $55.21 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 221551 YORK OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS 6035 < *> $237.96* 135562 04/19/93 $75.02 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 495 -2697 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 6452 04/19/93 $100.20 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6106 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 - $84.64 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6106 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $196.10 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6105 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 04/19/93 $450.18 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6113 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL * < > * 135563 04/19/93 $222.59 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 24155 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 6682 04/19/93 $1,902.15 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 24258 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 6882 < *> $2,124.74* 135564 04/19/93 $34.59 WALSER FORD REPAIR PARTS 184500 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $34.59* 135565 04/19/93 $100.00 WALSH WILLIAM PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES * * 135566 04/19/93 $292.71 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 3972 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPL 6656 < *> $292.71* 135567 04/19/93 $122.86 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 476410 -0 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 6625 < *> $122.86* 135568 04/19/93 $23.23 WIS -CON TOTAL POWER REPAIR PARTS 305261 FQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6434 < *> $23.23* 135569 04/19/93 $100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY PERSONAL SERVICES APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 135570 04/19/93 $115.27 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54261413 ARENA ADMINIST SAFETY EQUIPM 6861 04/19/93 $42.81 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 54261426 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 6797 04/19/93 $43.93 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54261427 CLUB HOUSE SAFETY EQUIPM 7006 < *> $202.01* 135571 04/19/93 .$53.43 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES /ART CE 041393 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE < *> $53.43* 135572 04/19/93 $191.08 ZUIDEMA, LYNN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 040793 GENERAL(BILLIN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $191.08* $847,441.57* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, APR 14, 1993, 9:55 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 $154,407.23 FUND # 11 $6,945.41 FUND # 12 $305.72 FUND # 15 $7,660.24 FUND # 23 $4,173.24 FUND # 26 $282.30 FUND # 27 $239,130.91 FUND # 28 $8,320.51 FUND # 29 $1,248.46 FUND # 30 $30,775.08 FUND # 40 $251,437.36 FUND # 41 $1,422.03 FUND # 42 $38,003.39 FUND # 50 $103,197.69 FUND # 60 $132.00 $847,441.57"