Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-06-07_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 7, 1993 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of May 17, 1993 * II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS III. REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REBATE - Edina School District III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION - Timothy Eickhoff EMPLOYEE COMMENDATION - Robert Lawson I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Special Council Meeting of April 27, 1993 and Regular Council Meeting of May 17, 1993 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Rezoning - Planned Office District, POD -1 to Automobile Parking District (APD) - 6400 France Avenue, BTO Development /Fairview Development Corporation B. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Plan Designation from Industrial to Commercial - Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil Property (Contd from 5/17/93) * C. Appeal of Zoning Board of Appeals Decision - Five Foot Setback Variance to Allow Living Space Above Garage - 6312 Indian Hills Rd (Contd from 5/17/93) III. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -8 - To Address Use of Awnings, Canopies & Marquees and to Change Number of Free Standing Signs in PCD District B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -9 - To Lift Moratorium on Issuance of Permits for Signs and Awnings by Repealing Section 461 of the City Code Agenda Edina City Council June 7, 1993 Page Two IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Articulated Sidewalk Plow (Contd from 5/17/93) * B. Four -Wheel Drive Utility Tractor With Cab/Detachable Loader (Contd from 5/17/93) * C. Unleaded Gasoline - Braemar Golf Course Maintenance * D. 4th of July Fireworks - Cornelia Park VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Curb Cut Request - 5621 Wood Lane B. Country Club Interim Traffic Report C. Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges - Mark Dalquist Addition D. Report on Edina Senior Center E. Appointment - Community Health Services Advisory Committee * F. Approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement and Fire Education Display Agreement * G. Approval of 1993 Labor Agreement - Operating Engineers Local 49 * H. Approval of 1993 Labor Agreement - IAFF Local 1275 * I. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date (6/21/93) - Post Lane Sanitary Sewer VII. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter Regarding Dog Ordinance - Irving Cobb, 5817 Ewing Avenue South VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES I%. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL R. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS RI. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 06/03/93 Total: $637,510.45 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon June 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon July 5 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues July 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon July 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HAY 17, 1993 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF HAY 3. 1993, APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Minutes of May 3, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO BE RETAINED FOR GRANDVIEV AREA (50TH STREET. ARCADIA AVENUE AND VERNON AVENUE) Executive Director Hughes recalled that on April 19, 1993, the Council granted Final Development Plan approval for the redevelopment at 50th Street and Arcadia Avenue. At that time, BRA staff recommended that staff be authorized to prepare estimates and solicit bids for boulevard shade trees and public sidewalks on 50th Street and Arcadia Avenue. The HRA did not accept the staff recommendation, preferring to delay authorization of the project until the private property owners had completed the private landscape plans. Staff believes that it is important that the landscape plans for the public right -of -way and the private properties be coordinated at this time although authorization could be delayed to a future date. Executive Director Hughes asked that staff be authorized to retain a landscape architect for the purpose of preparing a public right -of -way landscape plan for the 50th Street /Arcadia area to be presented to the HRA for project authorization at a future date. In response to Commissioner Smith as to estimated cost, Executive Director Hughes said he believed this work would approximate $5,000. Commissioner Smith commented that he hoped it would not go above that figure. Commissioner Kelly made a motion authorizing staff to retain a landscape architect to prepare landscape plans for right -of -way landscaping on 50th Street, Arcadia Avenue, and Vernon Avenue. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 12, 1993, and consisting of one page totalling $6,566.84. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:52 AM page 1 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12433 06/07/93 $22.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. NOTARY STAMP 900256 50TH STREET MISC < *> $22.28" 12434 06/07/93 $2,501.00 BRW INC. ENGINEER FEES 68136 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH/ < *> $2,501.00" 12435 06/07/93 $22.61 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 052493/H GRANDVIEW MISC < *> $22.61* 12436 06/07/93 $30.00 CHRISTY, DEANINE REFUND PARKING PERMIT PERMIT # 50TH STREET PARKING PERMI < *> $30.00* 12437 06/07/93 $33.00 ESPING. STEPHANIE REFUND PARKING PERMIT PERMIT # 50TH STREET PARKING PERMI < *> $33.00* 12438 06/07/93 $2,966.50 MASTER ELECTRIC CO I RES AMENITIES 11529. CENTENNIAL LAK RESID IMPROVE 06/07/93 $4,198.00 MASTER ELECTRIC CO I RES AMENITIES 10926 CENTENNIAL LAK RESID IMPROVE < *> $7,164.50* 12439 06/07/93 $14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR HRA BOND PAYMENT JUNE 199 EDINBOROUGH LOAN TO 0TH F < *> $14,166.67" $23,940.06* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, JUN 3, 1993, AM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 $23,940.06 $23,940.08" 4 =ew o �1. ( -- \ NRI.nM•'� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: ,NNE 7, 1993 Subject: EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REBATE Recommendation: Agenda Item w HRA III Consent Information Only jI Mgr. Recommends I I To HRA Rebate excess tax increments to the Edina School District from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. Rebate amount for 1993 - $20,000.00. Info /Background: The Board of Education for the Edina Public Schools has adopted the attached resolution which requests that the HRA rebate excess tax increments resulting from the 1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the requested rebate is $20,000.00. This rebate would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. The HRA granted similar rebates to the School District in 1991 and in 1992. In 1991, the School District used the rebated funds to recondition tennis courts at the Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the cost of rehabilitating the track at Kuhlman Field. For 1993, the School District proposes , to use the rebate to improve handicap accessibility to the seating area in the Kuhlman Field stadium complex, and to upgrade the press box facility. As an alternative, the rebate would be applied to replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. The School District points out that these facilities receive use by the residents of the City. The requested rebate is for 1993 only. Future rebates will be considered on a year -by- year basis. To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Rebate excess tax increments to the Edina School District from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. Rebate amount for 1993 - $20,000.00. Info /Background: The Board of Education for the Edina Public Schools has adopted the attached resolution which requests that the HRA rebate excess tax increments resulting from the 1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the requested rebate is $20,000.00. This rebate would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. The HRA granted similar rebates to the School District in 1991 and in 1992. In 1991, the School District used the rebated funds to recondition tennis courts at the Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the cost of rehabilitating the track at Kuhlman Field. For 1993, the School District proposes , to use the rebate to improve handicap accessibility to the seating area in the Kuhlman Field stadium complex, and to upgrade the press box facility. As an alternative, the rebate would be applied to replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. The School District points out that these facilities receive use by the residents of the City. The requested rebate is for 1993 only. Future rebates will be considered on a year -by- year basis. WE CARE WE DARE WE SHARE 4 I PUBLIC SCHOOLS May 25, 1993 Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a resolution recently approved by the Edina Board of Education. The resolution requests that the Edina City Council consider a rebate of the excess revenue that is generated for the city's Tax Increment Finance (TIF) districts because of the 1988 excess levy referendum. You may recall that the Board of Education has made a similar request each of the past two years that has been approved by the Edina City Council. Sincerely, James A. Hamann Assistant Superintendent for Business Services JAH /mef Enc. 5701 NORMANDALE ROAD E D I N A MINNESOTA 55424 /4 6 1 2- 9 2 0. 2 9 8 0 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, May 24, 1993 Volume 64, Report 425 SUBJECT: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE FROM THE 1988 REFERENDUM Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Request the Edina City Council to rebate excess tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988 referendum for the fiscal year 1992 -93 only in an amount of $20,000. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Edina contains four tax increment financing districts, two of which (50th and France District and Grandview District) are inclusive within the school district. When these TIF districts were established the base or first year valuation of the districts was captured for taxing jurisdictions such as the school district or county, which means that tax revenue for the school district from the TIF districts remains fixed for a 20 to 25 year period. Because the TIF districts do increase in value the city is able to generate incremental tax revenue (difference between the fixed amount and current or incremental valuation). These incremental tax revenues are used to retire the development bonds and other costs of. development. When the voters of the school district authorized by referendum an additional levy, the result of applying the additional levy on the incremental or current value is the generation of excess revenue to the development (TIF) district. This phenomenon directs revenue to the TIF district through no action on the part of the city instead of producing revenue for the school district for whose benefit the levy was created. 664 665 The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act include a provision whereby a city with tax increment financing districts may pay excess tax increment revenue generated by a referendum levy to the school district (clause 3 of Subdivision -10 added to M.S. 469.177). Payment by a city to a school district of the excess tax increment revenue must be approved by a majority vote of the city governing body. This request can be made annually hereafter and considered by the Edina City Council on a year -to -year basis. If this request is approved by the Edina City Council, the funds would be applied to either the cost of renovation work at the Kuhlman Field Stadium complex for improving handicapped accessibility to the seating area and to upgrade the press box facility, or to the cost of replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. These are facilities owned by the school district, but used by residents throughout the community. 'j City of Edina April 12, 1993 Mr. Timothy Eickhoff 5312 Bernard Place Edina. Minnesota 55436 Dear Mr. Eickhoff, On be: -alf of the Edina Police Department, I wish to express our most sincere appreciation for the assistance you provided on Tuesday, April 6, 1993, at the France Avenue bridge over the Crosstown Highway. Officer Ron Riegert has advised me that upon seeing a distraught middle -aged female on the bridge, you stopped and immediately ran to her location. By the time you approached her she had climbed the bridge rail and was leaning out over the passing traffic below. You calmly reassured her that all the problems she had could be worked out and as you were a good listener, you wanted her to tell you about her difficulties. You asked a passing motorist to call the police on her mobile telephone and continued to encourage the despondent lady until she agreed to step back over the railing. Numerous motorists passed by during this period but you were the only person that stopped to assist. Several people asked later if the lady they had passed on the bridge had actually jumped. Upon arrival at the scene. Officer Riegert took custody of the woman who informed him she had walked awav from a Mental Health Unit at a nearby hospital. I want to thank you for your concern and assistance in this matter. Your intervention most likely prevented the death of a distressed person and possible additional carnage on the roadway. It is comforting to note that during a time when it is common to "look the other way and not get involved," you had the courage to come forward. Please accept our deepest appreciation. Sincerely, Leonard Kleven d Chief of Police EDNA POLICE DEPART71%MNT Edina Police Department Administration (612) 925 -2242 4801 NEST 50TH STREET FAX 1612) 92: -3032 EDINA. MINNESOTA 35 42; -1394 INVESTIGATIONS (612) 925 -22 ;0 F-k Oi . Q. leas 1� Proclamation Of Appreciation The Mayor and City Council, on Behalf of the Citizens of the City of Edina, Minnesota, Hereby Proclaim To All Their Sincere Appreciation to Timothy Eickhoff on April 12, 1993 In Celebration and Recognition of Extraordinary Judgement and Selfless Effort While Acting to Preserve Life. ` l MAYOR FREDERICK RICHARDS a MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 27, 1993 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. BID AWARDED FOR $19.580,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A It was reported that three (3) sealed bids for the General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A of the City had been received at the time and place designated in the Terms of Proposal approved by resolution of the Council at the meeting held on April 5, 1993, and included in the Official Statement circulated by the City's financial advisor on behalf of the City. The bids received were as follows: Interest Bidder Rates FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, 4.25% 1997 INC. 4.408 1998 -99 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 4.608 2000 MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 4.758 2001 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES 4.908 2002 INC. 5.008 2003 SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM 5.108 2004 -06 & COMPANY INCORPORATED EDWARD D. JONES & COMPANY Cronin & Company, Incorporated Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Bigelow, Incorporated Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc. American National Bank Saint Paul Craig - Hallum, Incorporated Peterson Financial Corporation John G. Kinnard & Company Incorporated Park Investment Corporation Isaak Bond Investments, Inc. CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 4.508 1997 -99 INCORPORATED 4.708 2000 KEMPER SECURITIES, INC. 4.808 2001 GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHENS & =4.908 2002 THOMPSON, INC. 5.008 2003 5.108 2004 5.208 2005 5.258 2006 LEHMAN BROTHERS PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INCORPORATED BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC. ROBERT W. BAIRD & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 4.158 1997 4.358 1998 4.558 1999 4.758 2000 4.908 2001 5.008 2002 5.108 2003 -04 5.208 2005 Net True Interest Interest Price* Cost Rate $19,458,450.00 $8,475,330.63 5.0282% $19,458.450.00 $8,588,618.75 5.09598 $19,458,450.00 $8,635,835.63 5.12148 FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL 5.30% 2006 MARKETS INC. John Nuveen and Co. Inc. Nike Securities Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. * Subsequent to bid opening, the issue size was reduced to $19,580,000, and the purchase prices were reduced to reflect such reduction in principal amount. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $19,580,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT. REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the Issuer), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. The Issuer has presently outstanding its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A, initially dated as of August 1, 1986 (the 1986A Bonds), its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B, initially dated as of August 1, 1986 (the 1986B Bonds), its General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989, initially dated as of November 1, 1989 (the 1989 Bonds) and its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,.Series 1990A, initially dated as of March 1, 1990 (the 1990 Bonds) (the 1986A Bonds, the 1986B Bonds, the 1989 Bonds and the 1990 Bonds are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Prior Bonds). This Council, by a resolution adopted on April 5, 1993, authorized the sale of General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (the Bonds), of the Issuer, the proceeds of which would be used, together with any additional funds of the Issuer which might be required, to refund in advance of maturity (i) the 1986A Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2006 which aggregate $3,400,000 in principal amount, (ii) the 1986B Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2003, which aggregate $1,350,000 in principal amount, (iii) the 1989 Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2006, which aggregate $10,710,000 in principal amount and $355,000 of the 1989 Bonds maturing on January 1, 1996, and (iv) the 1990 Bonds maturing in the years 2002 through 2005 which aggregate $3,080,000 in principal amount (such portion of the Prior Bonds to be refunded is hereinafter called the Refunded Bonds). Said refunding constitutes a "crossover refunding" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.17, subd. 13. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The Issuer has retained Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisors in connection with the sale of the Bonds. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2, paragraph (9), the requirements as to public sale do not apply to the issuance of the Bonds. Bids have been received in accordance with the Terms of Proposal approved by the resolution adopted by this Council on April 5, 1993 authorizing the sale of the Bonds, and the Council has publicly considered all sealed bids presented in conformity with the Terms of Proposal. The most favorable of such bids is ascertained to be that of FBS Investment Services, Inc., and associates, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $19,384,200 plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and payment,-on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 1.03 Award of Bonds. The sale of the Bonds is hereby awarded to the Purchaser and the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Issuer to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds in accordance with the terms of the bid. The good faith deposit of the Purchaser shall be retained and deposited by the Issuer until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. The good faith checks of other bidders shall be returned to them forthwith. 1.04. Savings. It is hereby determined that by issuance of the Bonds the Issuer will realize a substantial interest rate reduction, a gross savings of approximately $1,277,877.51 and a present value savings (using the yield on the Bonds, computed in accordance with Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as the discount factor) of approximately $944,442.97. 1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for the Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Bond Terms: Registration: Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Issuance of Bonds. The Bonds shall be originally dated May 1, 1993, as the date of original issue and shall be issued forthwith on or after such date using a Global Book Entry System. One Global Certificate representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year (the Global Certificates) will be issued and fully registered as to principal and interest in the name of,Kray & Co. as nominee of the Midwest Securities Trust Company (the Depository), a Securities and Exchange Commission registered depository, an Illinois trust company, a member of the Federal Reserve System and a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code. 2.02. Maturities• Interest Rates* Denominations and Payment. The Bonds shall be in the'denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, of.single maturities, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest from date of original issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate 1997 $1,635,000 4.25% 1998 1,625,000 4.40 1999 1,635,000 4.40 2000 1,610,000 4.60 2001 1,680,000 4.75 2002 2,415,000 4.90 2003 2,455,000 5.00 2004 2,230,000 5.10 2005 2,555,000 5.10 2006 1,740,000 5.10 The tax increments pledged and appropriated by Section 5 and amounts from the escrow account established in Section 3 hereof are estimated to be sufficient to pay when due the'principal of and interest on the Bonds. 2.03. Dates and Interest Payment Dates. The Bonds shall bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year (an Interest Payment Date), commencing February 1, 1994, calculated on the basis of a 360 day year of twelve 30 day months. Interest on any Global Certificate shall be paid as provided in the first paragraph thereof, and interest on any Non - Global Bond shall be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name the Bond is registered (the Holder) on the registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar, and in each case at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) calendar day preceding such Interest Payment Date (the Regular Record Date). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who. is the Holder thereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder thereof at the close of business on a date (the Special Record Date) fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the Holders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. 2.04. Form of Bond. The Bonds shall be in the form of Global Certificates unless and until Replacement Bonds are made available as provided in Section 2.14, and otherwise shall be in the form of Non - Global Bonds. The form of Bonds shall be substantially as set forth in Exhibit A for the Global Certificates or as set forth in Exhibit B for the Non - Global Bonds, but may contain such additional or different terms and provisions as to the form and time of payment, record date, notices and other matters as are consistent with a Supplemental Resolution. 2.05. Redemption. The Issuer may elect on February 1, 2002, and on any date thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the maturity of the Bonds to be redeemed and the amount of such maturity to be redeemed. If a maturity is prepaid only in part, prepayments will be in increments of $5,000 of principal. All such prepayments shall be at a price of par plus.accrued interest. The Bond Registrar shall call Bonds for redemption and payment as herein provided upon receipt by the Bond Registrar at least forty -five (45) days prior to the redemption date of a request of the Issuer, in written form if the Bond Registrar is other than a Issuer officer, unless a shorter period of notice is acceptable to the Bond Registrar. Such request shall specify the principal amount of Bonds to be called for redemption, the redemption date and the redemption price. Published notice of redemption shall in each case be given in accordance with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent (if other than a Issuer officer) and to each affected Holder. If and when the Issuer shall call any of the Bonds for redemption and payment prior to the stated maturity thereof, the Bond Registrar shall give written notice in the name of the Issuer of its intention to redeem and pay such Bonds at the office of the Bond Registrar. Notice of redemption shall be given by first class mail, postage prepaid, mailed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date, to each Holder of Bonds to be redeemed, at the address appearing in the Bond Register; provided that if a Depository Letter Agreement (hereafter defined) contains other or different requirements for delivery of such notice to the Depository, then the provisions of the Depository Letter Agreement shall be followed for that Holder. All notices of redemption shall state: (a) The redemption date; (b) The redemption price; (c) If less than all outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed, the identification (and, in the case of partial redemption, the respective principal amounts) of the Bonds to be redeemed; (d) the CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed; (e) That on the redemption date, the redemption price will become due and payable upon each such Bond, and that interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after said date; and (f) The place where such Bonds are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price (which shall be the office of the Bond Registrar). In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the Issuer shall also give, or cause to be given notice of redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least two (2) days prior to the mailing of any notice of redemption to Holders of Bonds to all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and to one or more information services of national recognition that disseminate redemption information, such as J.J. Kenney or Financial Card Services; provided that any defect in or failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. 2.06. Bond Registrar. The Finance Director of the Issuer is appointed to act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (the Bond Registrar), and shall so act for all Bonds unless and until a successor Bond Registrar is duly appointed. A successor Bond Registrar shall be an officer of the Issuer, or a bank or trust company eligible for designation as bond registrar pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bond Registrar shall also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor paying agent is duly appointed. Principal and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the Holders of the Bonds in the manner set forth in the forms of Bond and Section 3. 2.07. Execution and Delivery. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the.Issuer by the signatures of its Mayor and Manager, each with the effect noted on the forms of the Bonds; provided that any of such signatures may be printed or photocopied facsimiles. In the event of disability or resignation or other absence of any such officer, the Bonds may be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of that officer who may act on behalf of such absent or disabled officer. In case any such officer whose signature or facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. The Bonds when so prepared and executed_. shall be delivered by the Finance Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof. 2.08. Authentication: Date of Registration. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless a Certificate of Authentication on such Bond, substantially in the form set forth on the form of Bond, shall have been duly executed by the Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall authenticate the signatures of officers of the Issuer on each Bond by execution of the Certificate of Authentication on the Bond and by inserting as the date of registration in the space provided the date on which the Bond is authenticated. For purposes of delivering the original Bonds to the Purchaser, the Bond Registrar shall insert as the date of registration the date of original issue. The Certificate of Authentication so executed on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated-and delivered under this resolution. 2.09. Registration: Transfer: Exchange. The Issuer will cause to be kept at the office of the Bond Registrar a bond register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as the Bond Registrar may prescribe, the Bond Registrar shall provide for the registration of Bonds and the registration of transfers of Bonds entitled to be registered or transferred as herein provided. All Bonds surrendered upon any exchange or transfer provided for in this Resolution shall be promptly cancelled by the Bond Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the Issuer. All Bonds delivered in exchange for or upon transfer of Bonds shall be valid general obligations of the Issuer evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution, as the Bonds surrendered for such exchange or transfer. Every Bond presented or surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Bond.Registrar, duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of any Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost' Bonds. Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with, or notice to, the Bond Registrar, including regulations which permit the Bond Registrar to close its transfer books between record dates and payment dates. 2.10. Rights Upon Transfer or Exchange. Each Bond delivered upon transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried.by such other Bond. 2.11. Holders* Treatment of Registered Owner: Consent of Holders. (A) For the purposes of all actions, consents and other matters affecting Holders of Bonds issued under this Resolution, as from time to time supplemented, other than payments, redemptions, and purchases, the Issuer may (but shall not be obligated to) treat as the Holder of a Bond the beneficial owner of the Bond instead of the person in whose name the Bond is registered. For that purpose, the Issuer may ascertain the identity of the beneficial owner of the Bond by such means as the Bond Registrar in its sole discretion deems appropriate, including but not limited to a certificate from the Depository or other person in whose name the Bond is registered identifying such beneficial owner. (B) The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the owner of such Bond for the. purpose of receiving payment of. principal of and premium, if any, and interest on, such.Bond and for all other purposes whatsoever whether or not such Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. (C) Any consent, request, direction, approval, objection or other instrument required by this Resolution, as supplemented, to be signed and executed by the Holders may be in any number of ,concurrent writings of similar tenor and must be signed or executed by such Holders in person or by agent appointed in writing. Proof of the execution of any such consent, request, direction, approval, objection or other instrument or of the writing appointing any such agent and of the ownership of Bonds, if made in the following manner, shall be sufficient for any of the purposes of this Resolution as supplemented, and shall be conclusive in favor of the Issuer with regard to any action taken by it under such request or other instrument, namely: (1) The fact and date of the execution by any person of any such writing may be proved by the certificate of any officer in any jurisdiction who by law has power to take acknowledgments within such jurisdiction that the person signing such writing acknowledged before him the execution thereof, or by an affidavit of any witness to such execution. (2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (A) above, the fact of the ownership by any person of Bonds and the amounts and numbers of such Bonds, and the date of the holding of the same, may be proved by reference to the Bond Register. 2.12. Description of the Global Certificates and Global. Book -Entry System. Upon their original issuance the Bonds will be issued in the form of a single Global Certificate for each "maturity, deposited with the Depository by the Purchaser and immobilized as provided in Section 2.14. No beneficial owners of interests in the Bonds will receive certificates representing their respective interests in the Bonds except as provided in Section 2.14. Except as so provided, during the term of the Bonds, beneficial ownership (and subsequent transfers of beneficial ownership) of interests in the Global Certificates will be reflected by book entries made on the records of the Depository and its Participants and other banks, brokers, and dealers participating in the National System. The Depository's book entries of beneficial ownership interests are authorized to be in integral increments of $5,000, despite the larger authorized denominations of the Global Certificates. Payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Global Certificates will be made to the Bond Registrar as paying agent, and in turn by the Bond Registrar to the Depository or its nominee as registered owner of the Global Certificates, and the Depository according to the laws and rules governing it will receive and forward payments on behalf of the beneficial owners of the Global Certificates. 2.13. Depository Letter Agreement. There has been submitted to this Council a form of letter agreement between the Bond Registrar and the Depository. Such letter agreement (the Depository Letter Agreement) is hereby approved. The Bond Registrar, the Mayor and the Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Depository Letter Agreement in substantially the form submitted, with only such variations therein as may be required to complete the Depository Letter Agreement, or which are not, in the opinion of the Issuer Attorney and bond counsel, materially adverse to the interests of the Issuer. 2.14. Immobilization of Global Certificates by the Depository: Successor Depository and Replacement Bonds. Pursuant to the request of the Purchaser to the Depository, immediately upon the original delivery of.the Bonds the Purchaser will deposit the Global Certificates representing all of the Bonds with the Depository. The Global Certificates shall be in typewritten form or otherwise as acceptable to the Depository, shall be registered in the name of the Depository,or its nominee and shall be held immobilized from circulation at the offices of the Depository. The Depository or its nominee will be the sole holder of record of the Global Certificates and no investor or other party purchasing, selling or otherwise transferring ownership of interests in any Bond is to receive, hold or deliver any Global Certificates so long as the Depository holds the Global Certificates immobilized from circulation, except as provided below in this Section. Global Certificates evidencing the Bonds may not, after their original delivery, be transferred or exchanged except: (i) Upon exchange of a Global Certificate after a partial redemption, as provided in Section 2.15, (ii) To any successor of the Depository (or its nominee) or any substitute depository (a "Substitute Depository ") designated pursuant to clause (iii) of this subparagraph, provided that any successor of the Depository or any Substitute Depository must be both a "clearing corporation" as defined in the Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code, Minnesota Statutes, Section 336.8 -102, and a qualified and registered "clearing agency" as provided in Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (iii) To a Substitute Depository designated by and acceptable to the Issuer upon (a) the determination by the Depository that the Bonds shall no longer be eligible for its depository services or (b) a determination by the Issuer that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its functions, provided that any Substitute Depository must be qualified to act as such, as provided in clause (ii) of this subparagraph, or (iv) In the event that: (a) the Depository shall resign or discontinue its services for the-,.Bonds and the Issuer is unable to locate a Substitute Depository within two (2) months following the resignation or discontinuance, or (b) the Issuer determines in its sole discretion that (1) the continuation of the book entry system described herein might adversely affect the interests of the beneficial owners of the Bonds, or (2) that it is in the best interest-of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they obtain certificated Bonds, in either of which events the Issuer shall notify Holders of its determination and the Issuer, the Bond Registrar and the Depository shall cooperate in providing certificates (the "Replacement Bonds ") to Holders and the registration, transfer and exchange of such Bonds shall thereafter be conducted as provided in Section 2.09 hereof. In the event of a replacement of the Depository as may be authorized by the second paragraph of this Section, the Bond Registrar upon presentation of Global Certificates shall register their transfer to the substitute or successor depository, and the substitute or successor depository shall be treated as the Depository for all purposes and functions under this resolution. The Depository Letter Agreement shall not apply to a Substitute Depository unless the Issuer and the Substitute Depository so agree, and a similar agreement may be entered into. 2.15. Redemption- Global Certificates. Upon a reduction in the aggregate principal amount of a Global Certificate, the Holder may make a notation of such redemption on the panel provided on the Global Certificate stating the amount so redeemed, or may return the Global Certificate to the Bond Registrar in exchange for a new Global Certificate authenticated by the Bond Registrar, in proper principal amount. Such notation, if made by the Holder, shall be for reference only, and may not be relied upon by any other person as being in any way determinative of the principal amount of such Global Certificate outstanding,- unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the panel. For the purposes of giving notice in accordance with Section 2.05, the "Holder" of Global Certificates shall be the Depository or its nominee. 2.16. Redemption- Non - Global Bonds. To effect a partial redemption of Non - Global Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar prior to giving notice of redemption shall assign to each Non - Global Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Non - Global Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such Non - Global Bonds to be redeemed. The Non - Global Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Non = Global Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of each such Non - Global Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 of principal amount for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Non - Global Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of such Non - Global Bond, without service charge, a new Non - Global Bond or Bonds of the same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Section 3. Use of Proceeds and Escrow Account. The proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of $19,387,043.50, and funds in the amount of $41,400 from Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. (the Provider), pursuant to a Forward Purchase Agreement (the Forward Purchase Agreement), between the-Provider and American National Bank and Trust Company, are irrevocably appropriated for the payment of all of the interest to become due on the Bonds to and including August 1, 1995 and for payment of $424,644.17 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on February 1, 1996, $79,278.75 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on August 1, 1996, and $79,278.75 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on February 1, 1997, and for the payment of the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds on the following dates and amounts: Principal Amount Paid or Refunded Bonds Crossover Date Redeemed from Escrow Account 1986A Bonds February 1, 1996 $ 3,400,000 1986B Bonds February 1, 1996 1,350,000 1989 Bonds January 1, 1996 11,065,000 1990 Bonds February 1, 1997 3,080,000 The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed, simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds, to deposit the proceeds thereof, to the extent described above, in escrow with American National Bank and Trust Company, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the Escrow Agent), a banking institution whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and whose combined capital and surplus is not less than $500,000, and shall invest the funds so deposited in securities authorized for such purpose by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subdivision 8, maturing on such dates and bearing interest at such rates as are required to provide funds sufficient, with cash retained in the escrow account, to make the above - described payments. The Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized to enter into an Escrow Agreement with the Escrow Agent establishing the terms and conditions for the escrow account in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, and to enter into a Purchase Instruction Agreement with the Provider in consideration for the amounts payable by the Provider under the Forward Purchase Agreement. Of the remaining proceeds of the Bonds, $65,092.16 shall be applied to pay issuance expenses and $ -0- shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund created pursuant to Section 4 hereof. Section 4. General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate Series 1993A General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund (the Sinking Fund) which shall be created and maintained on the books of the Issuer as a separate debt redemption fund until the Bonds, and all interest thereon, are fully paid. There shall be credited to the Sinking Fund the following: (a) Any amount initially deposited therein pursuant to Section 3 hereof. (b) All receipts of principal and interest on the investments held in the escrow account established in Section 3 which are to be applied to pay interest on the Bonds as provided in Section 3. (c) All taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the tax increments herein pledged and appropriated pursuant to Section 5 to the Sinking Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Bonds. (d) Any other funds appropriated by the Council for-the payment of the Bonds. Section 5. Pledge of Tax Increment. Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts are being issued by the City to refund the 1986A Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2006 and the 1989 Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2006 and $355,000 of the principal amount of the 1989 Bonds maturing on January 1, 1996 (such portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds): Year Amount 1997 $1,458,029 1998 1,428,029 1999 1,423,281 2000 1,398,281 2001 1,471,174 2002 1,484,572 2003 1,463,266 2004 1,435,,000 2005 1,730,000 2006 1,740,000 All of the interest to come due on the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds to and including August 1, 1995, and $345,365.42 of the interest to come due on February 1, 1996, shall be paid from amounts in the escrow account established in Section 3. Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts are being issued by the City to refund the 1986B Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2003 (such portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds): Year Amount 1997 $176,971 1998 176,971 1999 191,719 2000 191,719 2001 193,826 2002 225,428 2003 231,734 All of the interest to come due on the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds to and including February 1, 1996 shall be paid from amounts in the escrow account established in Section 3 hereof. Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts are being issued by the City to refund the 1990 Bonds maturing in the years 2002 through 2005 (such portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds): Year Amount 1998 $ 20,000 1999 20,000 2000 20,000 2001 15,000 2002 705,000 2003 760,000 2004 795,000 2005 825,000 All of the interest to come due on the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds to and including February 1, 1997 shall be paid from amounts in the escrow accounts established in Section 3 hereof. To pay the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby irrevocably pledges to the Sinking.Fund tax increments derived from the tax increment financing districts of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the HRA), designated by Hennepin County as Nos. 1203 (Southeast Edina - Centennial Lakes),,1201 (Southeast Edina- Edinborough) and 1200 (50th and France) and tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district of the Issuer designated by Hennepin County as No. 1204 (Southdale), which are either paid to the Issuer (in the case of the tax increment financing district established by the Issuer) or received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the Bonds (in the case of the tax increment financing districts established by the HRA). Such tax increments shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds, other than interest on the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on investments held in the escrow account established in Section 3, as provided in Section 3 and this Section 5. To pay the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increment derived from the tax increment financing district of the HRA designated by Hennepin County as No. 1202 (Grandview) which are received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the Bonds. Such tax increment shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay all principal of and interest on the Grandview Area Redevelopment Bonds, other than interest on the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on investments held in the escrow account established in Section 3, as provided in Section 3 and this Section 5.. To pay the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increment derived from the tax increment financing district of the HRA designated by Hennepin County as No. 1200 (50th and France) which are received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the Bonds. Such tax increment shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay all principal of and interest on the 50th and France Redevelopment Bonds, other than interest on the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on investments held in the escrow account established in Section 3 as provided in Section 3, and this Section 5. Tax increment derived from tax increment financing districts identified above may only be applied to pay principal and interest on the portion of the Bonds to which such tax increment is pledged and may not be applied to pay any other portion of the Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the Issuer or the HRA from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the tax increments herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds for the payment of other obligations of the Issuer or HRA. Section 6. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the Issuer shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It'is, however, presently estimated that the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 5 hereof will provide sums not less than 58 in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore no tax levy is presently required. Section 7. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this-section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the registered owners of the Bonds shall cease. The Issuer may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The Issue: may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The Issuer may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 8. Registration of Bonds. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County and obtain a certificate that the Bonds have been duly entered upon the Auditor's bond register as required by law. Section 9. Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the Issuer and County Auditor of Hennepin County -are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the Bonds and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from the books and records in their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the Issuer as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. Section 10. Tax Covenant. The Issuer covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or.permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest.on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. The Issuer will cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. The Mayor and Manager, being the officers of the Issuer charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. Section 11. Arbitrage Rebate. The Issuer acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The Issuer covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f) and applicable Treasury-Regulations to preserve the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Rebate Certificate setting forth the undertakings of the Issuer to comply with the foregoing requirements, and the Issuer hereby covenants and agrees to observe and perform the covenants and agreements contained therein, unless amended or terminated in accordance with the provisions thereof. Section 12. No Designation of Qualified Tax - Exempt Obligations. The Bonds shall not be designated as "qualified-tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. Section 13. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. Section 14. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. Section 15. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated April 13, 1993, prepared and delivered on behalf of the Issuer by Springsted Incorporated, is hereby approved, and the officers of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency thereof. Springsted Incorporated, is hereby authorized on behalf of the Issuer to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser and a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the Issuer shall deliver to the 'Purchaser 500 copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such notes as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 16. Redemption of Prior Bonds. The Issuer hereby calls the following portions of the Prior Bonds for redemption and prepayment on the following dates: The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Mayor Richards Nays: None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Maturities Refunded Bonds Redemption Date to be Redeemed 1986A Bonds February 1, 1996 1996 - 2006 1986B Bonds February 1, 1996 1996 - 2003 1989 Bonds January 1, 1996 1997 - 2006 1990 Bonds February 1, 1997 2002 - 2005 The Finance Director shall cause notice of the redemption of such Prior Bonds to be given in the manner required by the resolutions authorizing the Prior Bonds. Adopted this 27th day of April, 1993. Mayor Attest: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Mayor Richards Nays: None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. R- EXHIBIT A (FORM OF GLOBAL CERTIFICATE] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, INTEREST MATURITY DATE OF RATE DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE May 1, 1993 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: SERIES 1993A CUSIP THE CITY OF EDINA, County of Hennepin,•State of Minnesota (the "Issuer "), certifies that it is indebted and for value received.promises to pay to the registered owner specified above or on the certificate of registration attached hereto, or registered assigns, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, unless called for earlier redemption, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date "), commencing February 1, 1994, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months) until the principal sum is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most . recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond are payable by wire transfer (or other agreed means of payment), in next day funds or its equivalent, on each payment date no later than 12:00 noon (Chicago, Illinois time) upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the Finance Director, City of Edina, in Edina, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar "), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the Issuer; provided, however, that upon a partial redemption of this Bond which results in the stated amount hereof being reduced, the�Holder may in its discretion be paid without presentation of this Bond, and may make a notation on the panel provided herein of such redemption, stating the amount so redeemed, or may return the Bond to the Bond Registrar in exchange for a new Bond in the proper principal amount. Such notation, if made by the Holder, shall be for reference only, and may not be relied upon by any other person as being in any way determinative of the principal amount of this Bond outstanding, unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the panel. Interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date (by 12:00 noon, Chicago, Illinois time) by wire transfer (or other agreed means of payment) in next day funds or its equivalent to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder ") on the registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth calendar day preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date "). Any interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date ") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. Date of Payment Not Business Day. If the date for payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the City of New York, New York, or the city where the principal office of the Bond Registrar is located are authorized by law or executive order to close, then the date for such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which such banking institutions are authorized to close, and payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made on the nominal date of payment. Redemption. All Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2003, are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2002, and on any date thereafter, at a price of their principal amount plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the maturity of the Bonds to be redeemed; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, Bonds shall be prepaid in $5,000 increments of principal. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the designated redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Notice of Redemption. Published notice of redemption shall in each case be given in accordance with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent (if other than an officer of the Issuer) and to each affected Holder of the Bonds. For this purpose, the Depository (hereafter identified, or any successor thereto) shall be the "Holder" as to Bonds registered in the name of the Depository or its nominee. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, written notice thereof will be given by first class mail mailed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date to each Holder of Bonds to be redeemed. In connection with any such notice, the "CUSIP" numbers assigned to the Bonds shall be used. Replacement or Notation of Bonds after Partial Redemption. Upon a partial redemption of this Bond which results in the stated amount hereof being reduced, the Holder may in its discretion make a notation on the panel provided herein of such redemption, stating the amount so redeemed. Such notation, if made by the Holder, shall be for reference only, and may not be relied upon by any other person as being in any way determinative of the principal amount of the Bond outstanding, unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the panel. Otherwise, the Holder may surrender this Bond to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of such Bond, without service charge, a new Bond of the same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of the authorized denomination in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Issuance: Purpose. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $19,580,000, all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to number, maturity, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination, which Bond has been issued.pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475, and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on April 27, 1993 (the "Resolution "), to refund certain outstanding general obligation tax increment bonds of the Issuer. The Bonds are payable primarily from tax increments from tax increment financing districts established by the Issuer or the-Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal,of and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the Issuer have been and are irrevocably pledged. Denominations* Exchanee: Resolution. The Bonds are issuable originally only as Global Certificates in the denomination of the entire principal amount of the series maturing on a single date. Global Certificates are not exchangeable for fully registered bonds of smaller denominations except in the event of a partial redemption as above provided or in exchange for Replacement Bonds if then available. Replacement Bonds, if made available as provided below, are issuable solely as fully registered bonds in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof of a.single maturity and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other authorized denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Replacement Bonds. Replacement Bonds may be issued by the Issuer: (a) If Midwest Securities Trust Company (the "Depository ") shall resign or discontinue its services for the Bonds, and only if the Issuer is unable to locate a substitute depository within two (2) months following the resignation or discontinuance, or (b) upon a determination by the Issuer in its sole discretion that (1) the continuation of the book -entry system described in the Resolution might adversely affect the interests of the beneficial owners of the Bonds, or (2) that it is in the best interest of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they obtain certificated Bonds. Transfer. This Bond shall be registered in the name of the payee on the books of the Issuer by presenting this Bond for registration to the Bond Registrar, who will endorse his, her or its name and note the date of registration opposite the name of the payee in the certificate of registration attached hereto. Thereafter this Bond may be transferred by delivery with an assignment duly executed by the Holder or the Holder's legal representatives, and the Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the Holder as the person exclusively entitled to exercise all the rights and powers of an owner until this Bond is presented with such assignment for registration of transfer, accompanied by assurance of the nature provided by law that the assignment is genuine and effective, and until such transfer is registered on said books and noted hereon by the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the, Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with, or notice to, the Bond Registrar. Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Treatment of Registered Owner. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. Not Oualified Tax - Exempt Obligations. The Bonds have not been designated by the Issuer as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts,- conditions and things. .required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the Issuer according to its terms, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law; that prior to the issuance hereof, the Issuer has pledged and appropriated tax increments to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that if necessary for the payment of the Bonds ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property of the Issuer, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the Issuer to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Date of Registration: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within. FINANCE DIRECTOR, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Bond Registrar BY CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION The transfer of ownership of the principal amount of the attached Bond may be made only by the registered owner or the owner's legal representative last noted below. DATE OF SIGNATURE OF REGISTRATION REGISTERED OWNER BOND REGISTRAR REGISTER OF PARTIAL PAYMENTS The principal amount of the attached Bond has been prepaid on the dates and in the amounts noted below: Signature of Signature of Date Amount Bondholder Bond Registrar If a notation is made on this register, such notation has the effect stated in the attached Bond. Partial payments do not require the presentation of the attached Bond to the Bond Registrar, and a Holder could fail to note the partial payment here. ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA - as custodian for (Cust) (Minor) under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Signature Guaranteed: attorney to with full Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee: R- EXHIBIT B [Form of Non - Global Bond] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 1993A INTEREST MATURITY DATE OF RATE DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE CUSIP May 1, 1993 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THE CITY OF EDINA, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (the "Issuer "), certifies that it is indebted and for value received promises to pay to the registered owner specified above or registered assigns, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, unless called for earlier redemption, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date "), commencing February 1, 1994, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months) until the principal sun is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most recent. Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond are payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the Finance Director, City of Edina, in Edina, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar"), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the Issuer. Interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder ") on the registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth calendar day preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date "). Any interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the Special Record Date ") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS BOND SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, WHICH PROVISIONS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS IF SET FORTH HERE. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the Issuer according to its terms, -have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law; that in and by the Resolution, the Issuer has covenanted and agreed with the registered owners that the Bonds are payable from a separate debt redemption fund of the Issuer; that prior to the issuance hereof, the Issuer has pledged and appropriated tax increments to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that if necessary for the payment of the Bonds ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property of the Issuer, without limitation as'to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the Issuer to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of ,indebtedness. N IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Date of Registration: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within. FINANCE DIRECTOR, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Bond Registrar By (ON REVERSE OF BOND) Date of Payment Not Business Day. If the date for payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the City of New York, New York, or the city where the principal office of the Bond Registrar is located are authorized by law or executive order to close, then the date for such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which such banking institutions are authorized to close, and payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made on the nominal date of payment. Redemption. All Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2003, are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2002, and on any date thereafter, at a price of their principal amount plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the maturity of Bonds to be redeemed; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Notice of Redemption. Published notice of redemption shall in each. case be given.in accordance with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent (if other than an officer of the Issuer) and to each affected Holder of the Bonds. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, written notice thereof will be given by first class mail mailed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date to each Holder of Bonds to be redeemed. In connection with any such notice, the "CUSIP" numbers assigned to the Bonds shall be used. Selection-of Bonds for Redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers assigned to the Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of such Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of such Bond, without service charge, ,a new Bond or Bonds of the same series having the same 'stated maturity and interest rate and of any authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Issuance: Purpose. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $19,580,000 all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to number, maturity, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination, which Bond has been issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the Issuer on April 27, 1993 (the "Resolution "), to refund - certain outstanding general obligation tax increment bonds of the Issuer. The Bonds are,,% payable primarily from tax increments from tax increment financing districts established by the Issuer or the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the Issuer have been and are irrevocably pledged. Denominations: Exchange: Resolution. The Bonds are issuable solely as fully registered bonds in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof of a single maturity and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other authorized denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Transfer. This Bond is transferable by the Holder in person or by the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal office of the Bond _Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar. Thereupon the Issuer shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in exchange for this Bond, one or more new fully registered Bonds in the name of the transferee (but not registered in blank or to "bearer" or similar designation), of an authorized denomination or denominations, in aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of this Bond, of the same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate. Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Treatment of Registered Owner. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication •. hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. Not Oualified Tax- Exemvt Obligations. The Bonds have not been designated by the Issuer as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by -ae entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA - as custodian for under the (Cust) (Minor) Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. Signature Guaranteed: Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee: ADJOIIRPIII+.AT Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously for adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 P.M. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 17, 1993 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made,by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ARBOR DAY PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following proclamation which was unanimously adopted: ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION APRIL 30, 1993 WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and,the world, and WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and WHEREAS, Edina has been recognized for the past six years as a Tree City USA by The National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue the planting of trees for its future, WHEREAS, through a cooperative effort with the Edina School District, Cornelia PTA, and the Edina Park and Recreation Department, Cornelia Elementary has implemented an educational program called, "Cornelia Continues to Grow", WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota ReLeaf Community Forest Program has granted $6,000 to "Cornelia Continues to Grow" for planting of trees for the purpose of enhancing the community, benefiting the environment and providing educational experiences for the residents of the City of Edina, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim April 30th, 1993, to be Arbor Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 30th day of April, 1993. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - BOB BURNETT Mayor Richards read the following resolution of appreciation which was unanimously adopted: . RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Bob Burnett has served Edina School District No. 273 and the Edina community as Principal since 1968; and WHEREAS, he has been in education for 37 years, three years as Principal of Highlands Elementary and 15 years as Principal of Cornelia Elementary; and WHEREAS, beginning in 1956, Bob spent eight years at Concord Elementary teaching fifth grade; and WHEREAS, in 1966, he was in charge of the academic -abled program at both Cahill C Elementary and Cornelia Elementary; and WHEREAS, Bob Burnett has been a moving force in the implementation of a site - based managed school, cooperative learning and the option of a school within a school to house both the Neighborhood and Continuous Progress Programs at Highlands; and WHEREAS, through his outstanding leadership and sincere dedication in promoting the Edina Public Schools, Bob has demonstrated total commitment to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council, the City staff and the residents of Edina hereby express their thanks and appreciation to BOB BURNETT for his dedicated service in helping make the City of Edina an outstanding community in which to learn, work and live. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Friday, June 4, 1993, be declared BOB BURNETT DAY. ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1993. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 3. 1993, APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Council Minutes of the regular meeting of May 3, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *HEARING ON REZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO JUNE 7. 1993 FOR PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND PLAN DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL - LEWIS ENGINEERING/KUNZ OIL PROPERTY Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the hearing to'June 7, 1993; for rezoning to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Lewis EngineeringAunz Oil Property. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. APPEAL OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION CONTINUED TO JUNE 7. 1993 FOR FIVE FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW LIVING SPACE ABOVE GARAGE AT 6312 INDIAN HILLS ROAD Mayor Richards informed Council that directly before the meeting began Gretchen Holland, 6312 Indian Hills Road, asked that her appeal of the decision made by the Zoning Board of Appeals be continued to the Council meeting of June 7, 1993. Daniel Dunn, 6400 Indian Hills Road, stated that he lived on the adjacent property and was opposed to the variance. He voiced disapproval with the request for continuance because he felt it not fair and very inconvenient. Member Kelly made a motion to continue the hearing to June 7, 1993, on the appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision regarding a five foot setback variance to allow living space above the garage at 6312 Indian Hills Road. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. DAVID HETLAND OF REPRESENTATIVE RAMSTAD'S STAFF INTRODUCED Mayor Richards introduced David Hetland from Representative Jim Ramstad's staff. Mr. Hetland said he could be reached at the Bloomington office ,(8120 Penn Avenue South) and encouraged the Council Members and the citizens to contact Representative Ramstad whenever he could be of assistance, whether it be regarding City matters or personal matters. ORDINANCE N0. 1993 -6 ADOPTED - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 220 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES; RESOLUTION FOR REVIEW ADOPTED Presentation by Assistant Manager Assistant Manager Hughes explained that on April 19, 1993, Council considered the subject ordinance amendment to permit amusement devices that dispense prizes or rewards to the individual who has used the machine. Such automatic pay -off devices are presently prohibited by the City Code. At that meeting, Council granted First Reading to the proposed ordinance amendment, subject to the inclusion of a provision whereby the ordinance would automatically terminate in one year. Such a sunset provision had been used in several prior ordinances. At the April 27, 1993, Special Meeting, the Council again briefly discussed the proposed ordinance and staff was directed to provide the locations of other Circus Pizza restaurants in the metro area and to provide alternate ordinances for Council's consideration. These alternatives were to include the ordinance as originally proposed by staff, an ordinance containing a sunset provision, and lastly, an ordinance providing a review requirement but not a sunset provision. Assistant Manager Hughes then presented the three alternatives as directed by the Council. Alternate No. 1 would simply provide that no machine could discharge money, checks, tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other thing of value which would have a value greater than the cost to play the machine. Alternate No. 2 would provide an automatic termination provision aimed at April 1, 1995. Alternate No. 3 would suggest adoption of a resolution calling for review by the Council in February 1995 rather than automatic termination. Staff believed that a sunset or review provision should be consistent with the license term for amusement devices. At present, licenses are issued from April 1 through March 31 of each year. The date of April 1, 1995, would be a more reasonable time for the purpose of fairly evaluating the effect of the ordinance. Staff had contacted the Police Departments of the six metropolitan cities where Circus Pizza establishments are located. In general, Circus Pizza is characterized by the other departments as a family- oriented business. Four of the departments report that congregations of young people during the evening hours presented a public safety demand where off -duty officers or security personnel are utilized. Circus Pizza is basically described as clean and well - run. Staff would recommend adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -6, Alternate No. 3. Presentation by Proponent Norman Pink, American Amusement Arcades, stated that he was present to answer any questions and had brought diagrams showing the layout of the Circus Pizza proposed for Centennial Lakes. Member Kelly observed that Circus Pizza has hired off -duty police officers as security for most of their other locations and that she was concerned about potential problems because of the location, i.e. near water, large parking area, public park. She asked Mr. Pink if he would agree, in writing, to provide security at the Centennial Lakes location. Mr. Pink responded in the affirmative and added that they had intended to provide security just as a precaution because of their sizeable investment. Mr. Pink displayed diagrams of the proposed two level Circus Pizza for Centennial Lakes. He explained that the lower level would have an entrance and would house the kitchen, a three stage animated show, restaurant seating for 248, coin - operated kiddie rides (for children under 60 pounds) and a two -level climb and slide (for children under 48 inches tall). The upper level diagram illustrated the entrance, control and redemption counter, additional kiddie rides, redemption games and traditional video games. In response to Member Rice, he said a security person would be stationed on the upper level. Member Smith observed that more than one -half of the premises would be devoted to games and asked about redemption games, hours of operation, anticipated peak times and potential loitering. Mr. Pink explained that redemption games are games like skeeball, basketball toss, etc. requiring some skill. They propose to be open from 11 :00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Monday through Thursday and from 11:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. on Saturdays and Sundays. Anticipated peak times would be 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. Mr. Pink said that loitering would not be a problem as here are no benches or other seating inside except for the dining area but may occur outside in the parking areas. Member Kelly asked if the food service would be a fast food type of operation and how many employees would present at any given time. She reiterated her concern that 'there be plenty of employees to provide supervision. Mr. Pink answered that much of their business is birthday parties with a hostess for each party and where the food is served at the table. At peak times there could be a wait for seating for the general public but no food orders would be taken until seating is available. There would be approximately 18 employees on the premises at their busiest time which usually is Saturday afternoons. Member Paulus asked if Circus Pizza intended to apply for a on -sale beer or wine license and if it would be a smoke free environment. Mr. Pink said Circus Pizza would not be applying for a beer or.wine license and that all their locations became smoke free on January 1, 1993. He mentioned that Circus Pizza has been active with the D.A.R.E. program and has been hosting parties for the D.A.R.E. graduates from various schools. Member Paulus asked what generates the majority of their'income. Mr. Pink answered that the greatest portion of their income comes from the food operation with most of the profit coming from video games. Member Smith asked if Circus Pizza would be willing to limit hours of operation if problems with kids develop. Mr. Pink commented that their concern is for the health and safety of their customers and the neighborhood. If there were a problem and if it could be solved by adjusting the hours they would be willing to do that. Warren Beck, Centennial Lakes Partners (owners and managers of Centennial Lakes Plaza), told Council that he has been the landlord for Circus Pizza in Burnsville for more than six years. He said Circus Pizza is a very family oriented business and a cooperative tenant. Further, that Circus Pizza has indicated a willingness to work with the City to make sure that Circus Pizza operates well. As the landlord, Centennial Lakes Partners would be prepared to do the same. From past experience, he said he felt a good working relationship would maintain a positive environment for Centennial Lakes which would be consistent with and would compliment other uses there now. `favor Richards asked, assuming all are in agreement that congregating of groups would not be desirable, what steps would ensure that this type of activity would not occur. Mr. Beck.answered those choices may include: 1) providing some security, 2) reviewing hours of operation, 3) examining how a business is operating that would result in attracting persons to the area, etc. Mayor Richards commented he could not support allowing this type of activity if the introduction of this type of business to the Centennial Lakes area would change the positive existing environment in any way. Mr. Beck responded that Circus Pizza has demonstrated a willingness to work with the City to manage those kinds of situations should they occur. Public Comment Mayor'Richards called for public comment on the proposed ordinance amendment that would permit certain prizes for amusement devices. Kathy Pappas, 6730 Vernon Avenue, commented that Circus Pizza can control behavior inside their building but if kids are told to move on it then becomes a problem for the area. Council Comment /Action Member Smith commented that because of the public money and commitment invested in the Centennial Lakes development he had reservations about supporting the ordinance amendment that would allow this type of activity as it seemed in conflict with the type of recreation the City is trying to promote in the adjacent public park. He contended that Circus Pizza really operates as two businesses because of the clientele - a family- oriented business and a late hours business. What is at issue is the late hours business and related potential problems. He suggested that, if the amendment was adopted without a sunset provision and if problems develop, there be some recourse provision so that it would not become a public problem, i.e. cost of enforcement or affect the Centennial Lakes environment. Member Paulus said she understood that the issue before the Council was whether or not to allow the type of amusement machine that would permit redemption prizes and that any other type of amusement device would be allowed under the City's current ordinance. Further, that young people would go there regardless of whether or not Circus Pizza had the type of machine that would dispense tickets for prizes. She said she would support amending the ordinance to allow them. Assistant City Manager Hughes clarified for Member Rice that the value of the tickets or coupons returned for a single play could not exceed $.25. If the amendment ::ere adopted, it would not be location specific but would apply to all locations licensed for amusement machines. Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Alternate No. 2 of Ordinance No. 1993 -6 as presented, except for automatic termination on April 19, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Mr. Beck submitted that, because Circus Pizza may not open until September, 1993, there would not be an adequate period of time to evaluate its operation and to work out solutions if indeed there any problems. He said he would appreciate adoption of a resolution setting a date certain for the Council to review the ordinance to allow discussion on the subject with the Council. Member Rice said he would support the motion as it stands but concurred with the suggestion of Mr. Beck that there be a reasonable time for evaluation and discussion prior to the effective date of the sunset provision. Member Kelly indicated her support for alternate No. 3 without a sunset provision but.with a resolution for Council review on a specific date. Mayor Richards said he felt there should be some continuity and would concur with Member Kelly for a date certain on which to evaluate the effect of the ordinance amendment. Member Smith offered an amendment to the motion that Ordinance No. 1993 -6 be scheduled for review at the second regular meeting of the Council in January, 1994. `lotion to amend was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Smith then moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -6 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 220 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 220.11 is amended to read as follows: 11220.11 Automatic Pay -Off. No person shall keep, maintain, sell, or permit to be operated any machine which has been converted into an automatic pay -off device which shall discharge coins, checks or other tokens to the operator or player of such machine. No person shall convert any machine into an automatic pay -off device. Provided, however, machines which discharge money, checks, tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other thing of value which has a value no greater than the cost to play or operate the machine may be kept, maintained or operated subject to the provisions of Subsection 220.15." Section 2. Section 220 is amended by providing a new Subsection 220.15 to read as follows: 11220.15 Automatic Termination. The provisions contained in the last sentence of Subsection 220.11 shall terminate automatically at 12:01 A.M. on May 26, 1994." Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. Member Smith also moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Manager is hereby directed to place Ordinance No. 1993 -6 on the Council Agenda for January 17, 1994 for the purpose of reaffirming, amending, or repealing said ordinance. Motion for adoption was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *AWARD OF BID FOR ARTICULATED SIDEWALK PLOW CONTINUED TO 6/7/93 Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the award of bid for an articulated snowplow to the meeting of June 7, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR BUCK SHOT FOR SEAL COAT PROGRAM Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for FA3 Modified Buck Shot to sole bidder, Prior Lake Aggregates, at $10.50 per ton, and for Type FA2 to sole bidder, Shiely Company, at $7.24 per ton. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE UTILITY TRACTOR WITH CAB/DETACHABLE LOADER CONTINUED TO 6/7/93 Motion was made by member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue to award of bid for a four -wheel drive utility tractor with cab /detachable loader to June 7, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 6111/93 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman briefly reviewed the discussion that occurred at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting of May 11, 1993. Member Smith made a motion to approve the following recommended actions listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 11, 1993: 1) Establish a policy for use of the following categories of warning sigpage to be applied to neighborhood traffic safety concerns: (a) INTERNATIONAL PEDESTRIAN; (b) SPEED ADVISORY; (c) "CURVE "; (d) "PARR" and "PLAYGROUND"; and (e) "SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES ", i.e. "BLIND DRIVEWAY" on collector streets above 30 miles per hour or "DEAF CHILD ". 2) (a) Installation of "S" curve signage on both ends of Woodcrest Drive and speed advisories as recommended by City staff; and (b) to suggest to the School District that the school bus stop be re- located to a more open area. 3) (a) Installation of international pedestrian signage along the entire length of Ridgeview Drive; (b) installation of appropriate speed advisory signage; (c) to conduct a traffic study in the area after 5:00 P.M.; and (d) recommend to area residents that they strongly consider installation of sidewalks. 4) (a) Installation of a "STOP" sign westbound on West 55th Street at Beard Avenue South; (b) refer the matter to the Traffic Enforcement Unit for enforcement action; and (c) direct City staff to cooperate with the neighborhood in preparing an educational letter for distribution in the area. 5) Installation of an international teeter - totter sign with the word "PARK" below it on Heights Park property facing Limerick Lane. 6) Installation of international teeter- totter signs with the word "PARK" or "PLAYGROUND" below it on Hansen Road just north and south of Birchcrest Park. 7) Installation of international teeter- totter signs with the word "PLAYGROUND" below on Cornelia Drive in the area of West 68th Street and on West 66th Street at the entrance to Cornelia Park, and to refer speed concerns to the Police Department for possible enforcement action. 8) Installation of a "YIELD" sign on eastbound Navaho Trail at Cherokee Trail. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. (Member Rice left the room temporarily at this point in the meeting.) Member Kelly made a motion to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. (Member Rice re- entered the meeting at this point.) REQUEST DENIED FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM FOR MICK'S RESTAURANT AT SOUTHDALE Planner Larsen explained that Mick's restaurant is in the process of renovating the old Swenson's Ice Cream Parlor space at Southdale. Staff has been working with the architect on signage since March to ensure that the sign plan would meet ordinance requirements. Mick's has proposed seven signs totalling 177.68 square feet for the storefront which would comprise 11.48% of the 1,547 square foot elevation. Sign permit applications had not been submitted prior to the Council Meeting of May 3, 1993. Mick's has requested special consideration of their sign permit applications to allow erection of the signs in time for their opening on June 11, 1993. John Ryder, Arrow Sign Company, stated that he was employed by Mick's to obtain their sign permits. He confirmed that they have been working with City staff for almost a month on various design plans for the restaurant's signage and after conferring with Southdale management and the restaurant they felt they had agreed on a sign plan that would meet City requirements. On Tuesday, May 4, he was very surprised to learn of the moratorium on signs. Ron Thomas, General Manager of Southdale Center, asked consideration by the Council in granting Mick's a permit to erect their signage. He said that although Southdale is a substantial retail attraction for the community, they have been trying to encourage full - service sit down restaurants into Southdale. He submitted that, under today's market pressures, for a restaurant to open without signage would put Mick's at somewhat of a distressed opening. He asked that Council consider the petition of Mick's for an exemption to the moratorium. Mayor Richards commented that the Council has grappled with the sign issue many times and unanimity as to viewpoint may never be reached. He noted that a second request for exception (Agenda Item VII.A) has been received from Pearle Vision Express located at 7062 York Avenue. One method to deal with the requests would be to stop the moratorium altogether and direct staff to come back with alternatives relative to modification of the sign ordinance. Member Smith stated that, based upon the discussion at the May 3, 1993 meeting, he felt the moratorium on signage was appropriate. He added that a case-for exception could be made for remodeling projects that were nearly completed except for signage prior to the moratorium. Member Kelly stated that next on the agenda was the staff report on sign ordinance issues. She asked if a decision on both Mick's Restaurant and Pearle Express moratorium exceptions could be delayed until after that discussion. She added that she felt these businesses could open without signage. Member Kelly made a motion that Council hear Agenda Item VI.0 - Report on Sign Ordinance Issues before taking action on the requests for exception from the sign moratorium. Motion failed for lack of second. Member Paulus asked if there would be any difference between granting the exception under a remodeling project versus a new building project. Attorney answered that the moratorium does not make that type of distinction. Attorney Gilligan responded to Member Smith that the existing moratorium ordinance could be amended to except out certain projects that were under way, i.e. remodeling, when the moratorium was imposed. Member Smith made a motion to continue the request from Mick's Restaurant for exception to the sign moratorium to June 7, 1993, and to direct staff to draft an amendment that would address projects in some stage of completion where signage was eminent when the moratorium ordinance was adopted. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Member Rice commented that he could not support the motion because when the subject of a moratorium was discussed the Council recognized that it could be a problem for some. Further, that he felt a business about to open could consider temporary signs. Attorney Gilligan clarified that the moratorium only applies to signs that require a permit. Mavor Richards then called for vote on the motion on the floor. :fives: Paulus, Smith Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards Motion failed. Mayor Richards made a motion to grant an exception to the sign moratorium to Mick's at Southdale to allow erection of signage that would require no variance from the existing ordinance requirements. Motion failed for lack of second. REQUEST DENIED FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM FOR PEARLS VISION EXPRESS Mayor Richards made a motion'to grant an exception to Pearle Vision Express, 7062 York Avenue, from the sign moratorium to allow erection of signage that would require no variance from the existing ordinance requirements. Motion failed for lack of second. REPORT GIVEN ON SIGN ORDINANCE ISSUES Planner Larsen reported that on May 3, 1993, Council enacted a moratorium on issuance of all new permits for signs. Following the meeting, staff met to identify the issues raised by the Council with the intent of bringing those issues back for discussion and direction by the Council as to possible changes to the existing sign ordinance. The following 'issues were identified: 1. Awnings, canopies and marquees. 2. Sign area (how much allowed in a commercial district). 3. Window /wall area (relationship in determining amount of signage). 4. Freestanding signs (allowable number). Planner Larsen reviewed the following changes made in 1992 to the sign ordinance during the ordinance codification process which generally made the ordinance more restrictive: 1. Subsection 460.03, Subd. 13: Transparent or translucent awnings, canopies or marquees with signage =that are backlit will be counted as part of sign area. (Previously they were not addressed.) 2. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4: The height of freestanding signs in the PC -1 and PC -2 zones was reduced from 20 feet to 8 feet. (20 feet for pylon signs; 8 feet for monument type sign.) 3. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4: The maximum number of freestanding signs allowed in the PC -1 zone was reduced from one per building per frontage to one per building. (Previously, one sign per building per street frontage was allowed in all Planned Commercial Districts.) 4. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4A1: An area identification sign became included in the allowable number of freestanding signs on a site. (Previously, certain shopping centers could quality for a freestanding building identification sign as well as an area identification sign.) 5. Subsection 460.05, Subd. A4: Permanent window signs are now included in total sign area. (Previously, such signs were not addressed.) 6. Subsection 460.06, Subd. 3A: The amount of window area which can be temporarily signed was reduced from 50% to 25 %. Planner Larsen showed slides illustrating various existing signs on awnings, canopies or marquees and sign panels and explained how the following ordinance requirements applied to each: A. Such structure shall not be considered as part of the wall area and thus shall not warrant 'additional sign area. B. The entire structure shall be considered part of the sign area if constructed of transparent or translucent material and illuminated so as to resemble a sign panel. Graphics were shown to illustrate that sign area is measured in two ways: 1. The smallest single rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the letters, message, symbol, logo, or figure inscribed into or directly onto a building or a monument and not affixed to a sign panel. 2. The smallest single rectangle which can be made to circumscribe a sign panel which bears the letters, message, symbol, logo, or figure. Additional slides illustrated the following allowable maximums: PCD -1 District 1.. Sign area - 15% of wall area 2. Freestanding sign - one per building 3. Area for freestanding signs - 80 sq. ft. 4. Height - 8 feet PCD -2 District 1. Sign area - 158 of wall area 2. Freestanding sign - one per building per frontage 3. Area for freestanding signs - 80 sq. ft for first sign, 40 sq. ft. for each additional sign 4. Height - 8 feet PCD -3 District 1. Sign area - 158 of wall area 2. Freestanding sign - one per building per frontage 3. Area for freestanding signs - 100 sq. ft. for first_ sign, 50 sq. ft. for each additional sign 4. Height - 20 feet Planner Larsen recalled discussion at the May 3, 1993, meeting concerning the number of freestanding signs that would be allowed for the Biltmore Bowl. and Blockbuster Video redevelopment. Under the existing ordinance, one freestanding sign per building per frontage would be allowed. Conceivably, Blockbuster Video could have three freestanding signs because of the three street frontages and the Biltmore Bowl building could have two for a potential total of five freestanding signs on those properties. Planner Larsen suggested Council may wish to adopt the same language for the PCD -2 District as was adopted for the PCD -1 District during codification. For the PCD -3 District it would seem appropriate to keep the maximum number of freestanding signs at one per building per frontage because the large buildings are on large tracts of land. In summary, Planner Larsen stated that the Council might consider the following options: Awnings - Any transparent or translucent awning that is illuminated and appears to be a sign panel be treated as a sign panel even if it does not have a message on it. Sign Area Replace or reduce the 158 wall area limitation or place a cap on the total number of signs that a particular building could have in these districts. Staff feels the 158 limit has worked well and if reduced or capped it could lead to many non - conforming situations, i.e. imbalance because of new tenants coming into a building, desire to keep old signage because of its larger size resulting in less upgrading and /or maintenance. Window Area/Wall Area Discount or restrict the amount of window area counted towards total wall area. This would allow less signage by reducing the total wall area by discounting windows. This option could drive the architecture and result in replacing glass with brick. Freestanding Signs Limit freestanding signs in the PCD -2 to one per building regardless of the number of street frontages. In response to Member Kelly's question as to the districts, Planner Larsen explained that the PCD -3 District is a regional commercial district, i.e. the greater Southdale area. The PCD -2 District covers two areas: 50th /France and the Grandview area. The PCD -1 District would include 44th /France, Valley View/Wooddale and 70th /Cahill. Member Kelly commented that her concern regarding free standing signs was accomplished by the suggested limitation for the PCD -2 District. Further, that the option to treat illuminated awnings as a sign would reflect the interpretation of the Council. Member Rice stated that the report as presented was exactly what he was looking for. He said he felt that the 158 maximum wall area was reasonable and concurred that one freestanding sign per building be allowed except for the PCD -3 District. He suggested that the words "with signage" be stricken from Subsection 460.03, Subd. 13 so that it would read, "Transparent or translucent awnings, canopies or marquees that are backlit will be counted as part of sign area ". Member Smith asked if the issue of an illuminated or neon stripe around a building had been addressed. Planner Larsen pointed out that Subsection 460.04 prohibits in all districts "Neon or fiberoptic light sources which are not within the permitted sign area." If such are used, they must be included in computing the 15% sign area to be in compliance. Member Paulus reiterated her concern about windows being counted as wall area and cited the example of Walgreen's on 49 1/2 Street /France Avenue. She said she felt they should be encouraged to convert the colored glass to windows. Planner Larsen responded that Walgreen's would have preferred a blank brick wall along France Avenue because their floor plan does not work with windows. However, staff felt that any future retailer using that building should have available window space that could be opened up; the resulting compromise was the colored glass. He said this did not give Walgreen's additional sign area but made it more pedestrian friendly. Permanent signage, whether applied to the wall of the building or to the windows, cannot exceed 15% of the wall area. He pointed out that allowed temporary window sign area has been reduced from 50% to 25% which alleviates some of the cluttered look. Member Paulus said she still has a problem with the fact that, visually, a brick wall can better handle signage covering 15% whereas a wall with windows and doors with the same 15% sign coverage appears more crowded. John Ryder, Arrow Sign Company, submitted that, by counting backlit awnings as part of the sign area, a hardship would be imposed on small businesses with small storefronts. He suggested that consideration be given to limiting wattage or the number of lights allowed in backlit signage. Further, a well -lit store front also provides a feeling of security for customers. Member Smith made a motion directing pursuant to the report presented and consideration at the meeting on June Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Motion carried. staff to prepare ordinance amendments the comments of the Council for 7, 1993. Motion was seconded by Member Richards TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE PROCESS PRESENTED: SIX MONTHS TRIAL PERIOD TO BEGIN 7/l/93 Manager Rosland presented the draft policy that staff had developed to enhance the management of the Traffic Safety function in the City. No change in the current process is recommended until July 1; 1993. After that date, staff would recommend that the Traffic Safety Committee be reduced in size to include the City Engineer, the Police Chief and the Assistant City Manager, who would meet as a technical committee on issues brought forward by a contact person. A staff contact person, currently Craig Swanson, would work with the public to clarify concerns and formulate issues. The person(s) requesting signs or other actions would not discuss such matters with the committee directly but the contact person would present the public point of view to the committee for action. After meeting, the technical committee would be permitted to install warning, informational, and guide signs and stripes without Council approval. After the technical committee would make its recommendation, the requesting person(s) would be advised of the outcome and the rationale supporting it. If there would be disagreement at that point, the process to appeal the recommendation would be explained to the requestor. The appeal process would be virtually the same as it is now, i.e. the appeal would be made directly to the Council during its regularly scheduled meeting. Council could decide to schedule a public hearing and define the area of notification. As to staffing, the current committee staff members suggested that the new process would involve less staff time. The position of staff contact person could probably be reduced from one -half person time to one - fourth person time. Any staff changes would be formulated for the budget process. Staff would recommend a six month trial period to evaluate this process as to its effectiveness, responsiveness and time commitment by the Council. Assistant Manager Hughes answered Member Rice that the two citizen members serving on the current committee had been advised of the possible changes and were willing to give it a trial .run. Member Rice made a motion to accept the proposed Traffic Safety process as presented for a trial period of six months commencing on July 1, 1993. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Smith said he had some reservations about not including citizen members as on other advisory boards and commissions. Manager Rosland responded that after the trial period the Council may wish to consider an all- citizen review committee that could make recommendations to the Council. APPOINTMENT BADE TO PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Richards recommended to Council the appointment of Lorelei Bergman, 5825 Long Brake Trail, to fill an unexpired term of on the Planning Commission. Member Smith made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Lorelei Bergman to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1994. Member Rice seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. VACANCY REMAINS ON THE COMMITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor Richards reminded Council that a vacancy still exists on the Community Health Services Advisory Committee and asked that names of interested persons be submitted to him. REQUESTS FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM RECONSIDERED: MOTION FAILS TO PASS Member Kelly commented that she felt businesses should be required to obtain a building permit for either new construction or remodeling before applying for a sign permit. Further, that because Mick's at Southdale and Pearle Vision Express had applied for a building permit prior to the moratorium on issuance of permit, for signs, that their requests for exception from the sign moratorium be reconsidered. Member Kelly made a motion to grant exceptions to Mick's at Southdale and Pearle Vision Express from the sign moratorium.to allow erection of signage provided such signage would adhere to the proposed ordinance changes approved by the Council this date. Motion was seconded by Mayor Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Richards Nays: Paulus, Rice, Smith Motion failed to pass. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Belly to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 12, 1993, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $276,384.13; CDBG $135.00; Cable $6,630.11; Working Capital Fund $15,993.07; Art Center $2,300.17; Pool $809.17; Golf Course $401,430.17; Arena $10,509.27; Gun Range $542.22; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $32,129.43; Utilities $35,083.12; Storm Sewer $924.29; Recycling $38,237.99; Liquor Dispensary $105,954.06; Construction Fund $560.00; TOTAL $927,622.20; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 12, 1993 and consisting of 16 pages: General Find $128,479.03; Working Capital $452.00; Golf Course $137,085.00; Liquor Dispensary $259,656.52; TOTAL $525,672.55. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:17 P.M. City Clerk A. ey O ' • �N�bR10W"�O/ n.a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: June 7, 1993 Subject: Final Rezoning POD-1, Planned Office Dist. to APD:, Automobile Parking District. 6400 France Avenue S. Fairview Southdale Hospital and BTO Development. Recommendation: Agenda Item # II- A . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant Final Rezoning approval conditioned on: 1. Continued use of MNDOT property adjacent to Crosstown Highway. 2. Shuttle bus service from lot to hospital. 3. Watershed District grading permit. Info /Background: Preliminary rezoning was granted on February 16, 1993. Since then the zoning ordinance has been amended to make parking structures a Conditional Use in the APD zone. The proponents have returned and are now requesting Final Rezoning approval. The rezoning would allow for redevelopment of the property as a surface parking lot for use by Fairview Southdale Hospital staff. C O U N T 't' H I G I4 W A. Y r • —r i Y \II • .I I N I- m ��X.3� vv GURS J w 4 F w I Z -C, i I I I ' I. .i �� -' I I I I I s ail j (:1';, 2 7 t c ci ♦' �7 r r ! t n I ! Hh ik NG 1 W.o'y 4A:0' .B Sys c.�y [+ G•5' = .53.0' '-' 2i -o�-� - IE Y.¢,h i 5.5' = i63.o' iir.= I TYP(cA(.. efnGIN4 4 OAY5 ��'. -r P.' y. SlP.LIN4 4 �4`!S - NG • ]\ I I 1 I r7 I— i IIY �: �• I I I I i 77 MG T tic c. GL/KRE TFr pRA INAC:;vE 4••6 oSPec.ES ? 8.5'-170. G' y jl' �Tl' I �- 7'k E — to $ T f; 5 T _ j y�T v I SITE PLII!:-11-4 L16rwrIN6 SUMM?•RY F- AKKING 5uM4aFRY NUTABE 4 w�= 1"s3o---" AV r4 A0E IuuM I" -n-)N =0.5 Tj '.�>:,. -FU:1. 51;isE sPn.GES ;8. �'. le. o') � =4 =_ At - ulilbe ARE 3iv IZ foNGR� T>: G, 4. LI �+1 T STAN A4iZD5 AR� 3o Fr. 5Q ST_ G �n►�.Gr 3 Pa.:e s 7 5' Iro.o' 1 =-3 PIIALT FAVIW 15 3" 234.1 VJEAi Gu1n�c Ac O"CrAT'* SA&E IS ed1 44.6&2, t LICRIT Rxe 5A'r6 ARE Z4" r;A. (GNG. U7r VRAINMsE- y 5l1RPAdE -rtp 4pe;257. LICi}}T fIXTIJRES,ARE 4m WP +- µ� MANDIGAP - pRoVrM =IV= �5 , �BI.e A.1 DRIVE :1W ES ARE TNb WFY U.N.C. 7c� <. SPAGL� 77- AIDr -D. S7D Au.. AKEAS D'7TU7lB� 91 = t7/�M1fi+l. ��`�IY� (tdK' STTa fIXTUIIEb -5£E PLAN �R LY.. �C :)EVrII.OPMPINT GG7ZP. FAfR�IEW DEVELGPME Ci ?P PP /� �CGh CIA, evINJ „"_11-r 100 OF THE REGMAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 16, 1993 ROLLCAId. Answering rollcall were CO Motion vas made by Member Rice Member Paulus to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of removal of VII.D - Recommendation of Hu Commission - Human Rights Code. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. by Member Rice and was seconded by Member regular meeting of February 1, 1993. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four a -Tern ecooded:-by- presented O� Motion was made the minutes of the ocaugy-n TIM (5533 VEWWAY) ' ._t... FXNDM= DECISIOW Alim'BEASON Plamme seavracalledvthat. the subject =.- property, located east of Johnson Dr d south of Vernon Avenue, is a developed single family lot contai lot area of 20,800 square feet. At its meeting of January 20, 1993, the it heard a request that proposed the removal of the existing dwellin creation of two new buildable single family lots. Variances would be req on both lots for lot width, lot depth and lot area. Following the hearing Council directed staff to prepare findings of k fact in support of prelimi plat approval. Planner Larsen stated indings, decision and reasons have been drafted and were reviewed by the Attorney. A copy has also been given to the proponent. Member Smith made ion to adopt the Findings, Decision and Reasons in support of preliminary pproval to be attached to the Council Minutes and moved adoption of th loving resolution: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRE1 TMnU2Y PLAT APPROVAL. FOR GRANGER ADDITION BE IT REM by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain entitled "GRANGER ADDITION', platted by Winston G. Granger, owner, and tad at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 16, 1999, be and ereby granted preliminary plat approval. M was seconded by Member Rice. call: PRXLJIMART REZONING. LBO![ OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) TO AUTOMOBILE PARE= DISTRICT (APD) APPROVED FOR 6400 FRANCE AVENGE - BTO Develooment/Fairview Develoament Corsoration Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen informed Council that the subject property, located at 6400 France = Avenue South, is zoned Planned Office District (POD -1) and is developed witty a one -story office building containing a floor area of approximately 58,000'sgpara feet supportssvbyo -&* psrkin&lot... - Thesbuildiaw. vso ti BTD:: . �._ ---'• _ae•- -r �s??`_yf"'°'so.✓ ,.sue- ca e i�. -~ -- ��.�...w.r - - � ..__ _. r.r: � .R-- -�c—•� --tea— r �.iaoti a` . 2/16/93 L01 to rezone the property to Automobile Parking District (APD). The proposed rezoning would allow the demolition of the existing building and redevelopment of the site as a surface parking lot with 358 spaces. The surface parking lot would then become owned by Fairview- Southdale Hospital and used to support hospital activities. Access - egress would be provided via one curb cut on West 65th Street. The site plan illustrates existing landscaping as well as some - new materials (ten eight foot pine trees) which adequately address requirements for overstory trees. However, the plan does not provide required parking lot screening along France Avenue and West 65th Street. The APD requires a setback of 20 feet from streets and 10 feet from side and rear property lines. The proposed plan complies with setbacks except for the northerly property line adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. Existing parking actually encroaches on highway right -of -way. The property owner has an agreement with the State to use a portion of this right -of -way. Because the redevelopment plan would continue this encroachment, a variance from the required 10 foot setback is requested. The hospital is currently utilizing this site for staff parking. Employees are shuttled by van to the hospital campus. The utility of the proposed lot for the hospital would depend on the continued van service or other means to safelyUcrosaw France- Avenue.'-` At its meeting of January 27, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended approval of preliminary rezoning and the parking setback variance, conditioned on: 1) Continued use of MnDOT property, 2) Grading permit from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, 3) Continuation of shuttle service of other acceptable means to cross France Avenue, and 4) Landscaping bond to ensure adequate landscaping. In response to concerns raised by the Planning Commission the proponents prepared a revised plan illustrating added perimeter landscaping on three sides, additional landscaping on the France Avenue side to prevent employee crossing in mid -block and landscaping islands in the center. Assuming the rezoning is granted, Member Rice asked what the procedure would be and what control the City would have if in the future the hospital wanted to build a ramp on the subject property. Planner Larsen explained that under existing Code provisions the hospital would only have to apply for a permit to build the structure. He noted that the Planning Commission had raised the ramp issue more from an aesthetic concern than use and had suggested a review process that would monitor any proposed change from surface lot parking. He added that if the property is to be utilized only for parking it should be zoned APD. Staff response would be to draft an amendment to the Automobile Parking District which would require a conditional use permit to construct a ramp. Member Smith suggested that the amendment be considered by the Council for adoption prior to final rezoning of the property. Proponent Comment Allan Hill, BTO Development, said that to expedite the process they would like to move forward with the rezoning request, but would not object to staff's proposal to amend the ordinance to make construction of a ramp a conditional use. He added that he felt they had responded to the landscaping concerns raised by the Planning Commission. In response to Member Rice, Mr. Hill said BTO Development would be doing the demolitionLof the building and reconstruction of the parking lot. Fairview -� Hospital would-be closing on the property within the next 90 days and be°thaw 102 Member Smith reca pay parking, ther 66th Street. He crosswalk, etc. park on the site they could not he pointed out t h Avenue frontage intersection at granting of the of the shuttle s hospital utilize 2/16/93 lled that, when the Southdale Medical Building parking lot had a were many issues and concerns about pedestrians crossing West asked how the City could be insured from petitions for a Mr. Hill said that currently 100 Fairview Hospital employees and the hospital has a shuttle bus service in place. Although guarantee that some individual will not try to cross the street, at the design has been laid out with shrubbery along the France with the intent that any pedestrian would use the controlled France and 65th Street. Attorney Gilligan interjected that the parking setback variance could be conditioned upon continuation ervice. That condition would be in effect so long as the s the MnDOT right -of -way property. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly then asked for public comment on the proposed rezoning request. No comment or objection was heard. Council Action Member Smith made a motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 -A2 as follows and granting of a parking setback variance for property at 6400 France Avenue South. conditioned on the following: 1) Amendment to Code Subsection 850.19 - Automobile Parking District, 2) Continued use of NnDOT property, 3) Grading permit from Hine =Mils Creek - Watershed District, 4) Continuation of shuttle service, aad:- 5) Lamdscapingf:bond:. OBDXUNCM" N0 850-4t, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDII1ANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONIM PROPERTY FROM PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) TO ADTOMOBIIS PARK= DISTRICT (APD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Automobile Parking District (APD) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lot 1, Block 1. SODTHDALE OFFICE PAR[ ADDITION, except that part thereof which lies Easterly of a line drawn parallel with and 48 feet westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 28, Range-24; thence run Northerly along Easterly line of said section for a distance of 630.60 feet; thence deflect left at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of 10 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 5729.58 feet (delta angle 1 degrees 09 minutes 00 seconds) for a distance of 115 feet; thence tangent to said curve for a distance of 84.30 feet;' thence deflect right along a tangential curve having a radius of 5729.58 feet (delta angle 0 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds) for a distance of 84.84 feet to the point of reverse curve; thence Northwesterly -- — along- said - reverse- curve - having a radius of 123 feet a distance W f 140 feet and there terminating, according to the plat thereof an file or of record in the office of the Titles in and for Hennepin County. The extent of the Planned Office District (POD -1) is reduced the property described above from the POD -1 District." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect )assage and publication. lotion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly First Reading----granted.- . s. Registrar of by removing -. upon its 1 1-;-, Registrar of by removing -. upon its 1 1-;-, ' 4 g1NA. Arr�� o e `' tA W • RMMbi� • Ines REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: June 7, 1993 Subject: Z -93 -2, and Comp. Plan Amendment, Planned Industrial District to Planned Commer_c_ial District_ PCD -2, Kunz. /Lewis Properties by Watso Centers and Rainbow Foods. Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # i I . B . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The subject proposal was first heard by the Council on April 19, 1993. At that time the Council continued the hearing and directed staff to hire BRW to analyze the traffic impacts of the proposal relative to other potential reuses of the property. The traffic study has been completed and is attached for council review. The study has been made available to the proponents as well as others who have expressed interest. Representatives of BRW will attend the hearing. Notice of the June 7, 1993, hearing was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. PUBLIC HURIaG CONTINUED TO 5/17193 FOR REZONING (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DIS PCD -2 PIANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (INDUSTRIAL TO COM[MCIAL) FOR LEfiI&=Z OIL PROPERTY: TRAFFIC STUDY AUTHORIZED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered P resentation by Planner placed on file. lanner Larsen advised Council that a proposal has been received to rezone the subject property from Industrial to Commercial (PCD -2) and to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation from Industrial to Commercial to be consistent with the proposed rezoning. The subject property contains approximately 8.2 acres and is developed with a manufacturing facility which currently is vacant (former site of Lewis Engineering) and a warehouse building (Kunz Oil). The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing buildings with a 66,000 square foot Rainbow Foods store and a 4,800 square foot restaurant. The development would be supported by a 427 space parking lot. In support of their proposal the developers have submitted preliminary development plans, written support of the request and a traffic study to support the intensity of the proposal. The recommendation from the Planning Commission does not include specific zoning or traffic issues but is limited to addressing the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. Planner Larsen recalled that since adoption of the plan in 1980 there have been several actions and proposals considered which would have affected the use designation: July 1984 Land use alternative plan for Grandview Area presented to Council. Subject site illustrated as suitable for redevelopment for multi - family housing or office /office showroom. September 1986 Council heard multi - family housing proposal for property. Proposal referred to staff, but never pursued further by developer. July 1987 Council voted to accept multi - family housing as an acceptable reuse of the property. May 1988 Planning Commission considered retail office redevelopment of the site and school bus garage north of Eden Avenue. September 1990 Council considered retail redevelopment of subject property and school garage property. No action taken. August 1991 Council acted to leave Industrial designation in place. Staff would recommend denial of the proposed rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Further, staff would not support amending the Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: 1) Retail development should only be allowed south of Eden Avenue with a concurrent redevelopment of the-north frontage of Eden Avenue (bus garage). 2) The retail and office retail uses considered in 1988 and 1990 included redevelopment of the bus garage. 3) The only reuse of the property the City Council has supported, other than industrial, is a multi - family residential use. The Planning Commission only took action on amending the Comprehensive Plan and recommended it be amended from Industrial to Commercial to allow commercial development. In conclusion, Planner Larsen said there are a number of actions the Council could take on the proposal: 1) The Council could vote to deny the rezoning based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan. 2) If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation it could refer the Comprehensive Plan amendment back to the Planning Commission for public hearing. State Statute requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission for all Plan amendments. The Commission could then consider the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment at the- same time. 3) The Council could grant preliminary rezoning and order the Comprehensive Plan amendment hearing prior to Final Rezoning approval. This is not recommended since the Planning Commission has not made a recommendation on the proposed rezoning. If Council chooses to consider the merits of the proposal and to amend the Plan, staff would recommend hiring BRW to review the traffic study submitted by the proponents. Presentation by Proponents Steve Watson, Watson Centers, Inc., stated he was before Council to seek approval to amend the Comprehensive Plan and to rezone the Lewis/Kunz Oil site to allow for the development of a Rainbow Foods store and a free standing restaurant on the site. In an effort to understand the issues most important to the community as they relate to the redevelopment of the site, they met with City staff, members of the Council, the present landowners and many of the neighbors. Four major issues concerning the proposed redevelopment were identified: traffic, planning /land use, economic viability, and economic impact on the community as a whole. Mr. Watson said members of the development team would speak to these issues. Economic Viability - Dennis Crow, Rainbow Foods Vice ,President /Store Development, informed Council that Rainbow Foods was a concept developed 10 years ago and evolved from the former Applebaum Food Market Stores, a family run organization with a number of stores in the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. Today, there are 27 Rainbow stores'serving this market area, of which 17 are less than 10 years old. The Rainbow chain has evolved into an up- scale, service oriented warehouse format that emphasizes quality, variety and 'low, low prices on the good stuff'. The proposed Edina store will be a Rainbow flagship store with an even greater,level of service by the addition of a food court seating area adjacent to the deli department, a customer service counter, typical departments, i.e. meats, fish, McGlynn's Bakeries, and an in -store branch bank facility. As part of the site evaluation process, a market study was conducted for this location. The study evaluated location, site conditions, site network and access, market conditions, competition, population /demographic characteristics. The study "indicated that the trade area for this site would basically serve Edina except for a small fringe of the southern portion of St. Louis Park because of the location of surrounding stores. The road network will allow access from the entire City. Currently, there are four supermarkets in the City, with three being up -scale conventional stores not known for their price image. A significant number of Edina residents are currently leaving the City to shop at a discount grocery store outside the City boundaries. With the addition of this Rainbow store this business can stay within the City. Mr. Crow pointed out that over the years they conducted their site search they have had a number of contacts from Edina residents requesting a Rainbow store. This is the only developable site in the City that is centrally located, provides access to the entire community, and is the only site that can support a commercial development like that proposed. He said that there is no doubt that the Rainbow store will create a competitive climate greater than what exists today. Although not the most ideal location from a retailer standpoint, it is the most ideal situation for the City and its residents. The store will be operated on a 24 -hour basis, closing only for the four major holidays. It will comply with all the required standards set forth by the City and will have many architectural amenities that will be a compliment to the City. 19 Planning /Land Use - Mr. John Sharlow, principal with Dahlgren, Sharlow and Uban, advised Council that his firm had been retained by Watson Centers /Rainbow Foods to look at planning and land use issues. With graphics he pointed out that the subject site and a few immediately adjacent sites are the only properties in the area shown as industrial use on the City's Comprehensive Plan with the subject property zoned Planned Industrial District (PID). As the past history of the property indicated, although there have been a number of ideas generated for the area it remains designated as Industrial and zoned Planned Industrial District. As land planning consultants for Watson/Rainbow, Mr. Sharlow said as they analyzed the site they identified the fact that there is a great deal of buffer around the subject property, in particular the railroad tracks and steep slopes which block the view of the site from adjacent properties. As to drainage, the property generally drains to the'north and east. Located immediately to the south is the Eden Circle office warehouse building, which serves as transition for the residential properties to the south. In summary, Mr. Sharlow said the site does offer some constraints from a development perspective in that the narrow southerly portion makes it difficult to.use it efficiently and tie it into the northern portion of the site. Using graphics, Mr. Sharlow presented seven surrounding views from the subject property and pointed out various features. During the process of analyzing the site they refined various alternatives for proper access onto Eden Avenue. They also wanted to orient the building to provide that the vast majority of the active part of the use, i.e. parking, be located with the building itself serving as a substantial buffer between it'and the residential area. He pointed out that the building.is over 200 feet in depth with approximately 360 feet from the rear of the building to the nearest single family lot. The nearest homes on Edenmoor Street are separated by a playground and substantial vegetation and the principal loading area is separated by the location of the Eden Center office /warehouse building. In response 'to a letter from the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association which suggested that the loading areas be next to the railroad tracks, Mr. Sharlow explained that is a very narrow area and it would be difficult to provide for appropriate turning movements. The main loading bays are proposed to be located at the rear of the building and would be screened from the residential area by the Eden Circle office /warehouse building. A single loading bay for produce will be located at the southeasterly corner of the building with three produce deliveries per week anticipated. As a condition for approval, Rainbow Foods are willing to consider limiting the hours of operation for that loading bay to mitigate the concerns about late night activity. Mr. Sharlow noted that the ordinance calls for a parking setback of 10 feet along an interior or rear lot line and a 10 foot wide setback between a principal use building and parking or drives. The proposal includes 17 parking spaces along the interior lot line between the Rainbow Foods store and the rear of the TSC office building that are setback four feet from the property line. Placing the parking closer to the interior lot line along the blank side of the TSC building would provide a 10 foot wide strip for trees to be placed along the building facade for more effective buffering of both the building and loading areas. The proposal also includes a 25 foot wide service drive along the eastern property boundary next to the railroad. This drive is closer than 10.feet along a portion of the boundary which coincides with the industrial area to the east and is within three feet at the closest point. The railroad forms a six to eight feet high berm along this property line that will effectively screen the drive from the properties to the east. Placing this drive closer to the permanent berm allows for a larger buffer space along the eastern side of the Rainbow Foods building for increased landscaping along the building facade. The concept landscape plan as presented exceeds the City's ordinance requirements and shows 73 understory trees, 17 evergreen trees and 57 overstory trees. A concern about lighting was also raised by the Richmond Hills Neighborhood.. He explained that the vast majority of the activity will occur in the parking area. Although a specific lighting plan has not been developed, Rainbow will commit to the City that it will look at poles of reasonable height with shoebox type fixtures providing downcast lighting to make sure that only the parking lot areas are lighted. Lighting in the rear will be security lighting only using fixtures that will not produce off -site glare. In summary, Mr. Sharlow said the developers have worked out a concept plan that would fit nicely on the subject property. A great deal of time has been spent in refining the plan to try to deal with the site in such a manner that the activity is located along Eden Avenue thereby utilizing the building as a barrier and taking advantage of the fact that the Eden Circle office /warehouse building is an existing substantial building which presents a transition between the subject property and the area to the south. They feel it will work well from a functional standpoint and that their request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and to rezone to Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) is in order. Traffic Impact Analysis - Mike Gorman, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc., said his firm was retained by Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods to conduct a traffic impact study for the proposed development. The study took a traditional approach to determine the traffic impact of the proposed development and included: 1) analysis of existing conditions, 2) trip generation of the proposed development, 3) post - development forecasts of traffic volumes on the surrounding street system, 4) capacity analysis at key driveways and intersections surrounding the site, 5) recommendations for street improvements if necessary, and 6) conclusion as to whether the site is suitable for the proposed development. Existing Conditions - The area surrounding the proposed Rainbow Foods store is well served by the existing street system. Major streets are Vernon Avenue to the west and Interlachen Boulevard to the north. T.H. 100 to the east provides regional access with limited movement interchanges at Eden and Vernon Avenues. Traffic counts taken at the intersection of Vernon Avenue /Link Road on December 9, 1992, between 4:00 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. showed that traffic is able to circulate within and around the area with little difficulty. Trip Generation - The study concentrated on trip generation of the site during the period between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M. on a typical weekday because this is the time when adjacent street traffic volumes are greatest. Trip generation data was obtained directly from Rainbow Foods for grocery store generated traffic by averaging customer transactions from three stores in the metro area. For traffic generated by the fast food restaurant, data was used from ITE Trip Generation, a nationally recognized source. Based on this information, Rainbow Foods is expected to generate daily 4,323 trips and the restaurant 3,034 trips. During the P.M. peak hour the grocery store will generate 319 trips and the restaurant will generate 175 trips. Not reflected in these counts are estimated shared trips, i.e. people who go to the grocery store that also patronize the restaurant and vice versa, which would reduce the number of total trips to the site. Information for P.M. peak hour directional distribution of traffic came from the comprehensive market analysis that was completed by Rainbow Foods. Expectations are that 208 of the traffic would come from the south on Vernon Avenue, 158 from Interlachen Boulevard, 108 from southbound T.H. 100 (38 using Vernon Avenue and 78 using Arcadia Avenue), 558 from a mixture of westbound Eden Avenue and northbound T.H. 100. In addition to new trips, there will also be pass -by trips (trips on the surrounding_s_treet system that visit the site as part of another trip) that enter and exit the site. Typically, 40 to 608 of all traffic are pass -by trips. For this study, it was assumed that the number of pass -by trips was limited to 258. While pass -by trips do not reduce the driveway volumes into and out of the site, it does effect the directional distribution. Capacity Analysis - A capacity analysis was conducted to determine the level of service (IDS) rating of the driveways onto Eden Avenue from the development as_, well as the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection. The data indicated that the existing P.M. peak -hour level of service at the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection is good, with an overall LOV of C (acceptable with delays of 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle), with average vehicle delay of 16.7 seconds per vehicle. In the post - development scenario, the LOV at this intersection will remain C with an average delay of 18.2 seconds per vehicle. Both indicate an intersection that currently works well and will continue to work well if the proposed development is constructed. The same can be said of the two site drives. Both show a Level of Service A (ideal with delays between 0 and 5 seconds per vehicle) for the northbound right turns and westbound left turns. The northbound left turn at the west driveway is LOV D (delays in the 25 to 40 second range) which is considered acceptable for a non - signalized intersection. Traffic experiencing this level of service will not affect public street operations as delays will be within the Rainbow Foods parking lot. Recommendations - Recommended modifications to the proposed site plan and surrounding street system include the following: 1. Eden Avenue should be striped to a three -lane section between Arcadia Avenue and Sherwood Road to provide for westbound left turns into the development. 2. An eastbound right -turn lane should be installed on Eden Avenue for the westernmost driveway. 3. Adjust traffic signal timing at Vernon Avenue /Link Road to accommodate new traffic patterns. 4. Signs and markings at the western driveway into SuperAmerica on the north side of Link Road should be installed indicating "Do Not Block Driveway" to facilitate westbound left turn into SuperAmerica and southbound movement out of SuperAmerica onto eastbound Eden Avenue. Conclusions The following statements summarize the conclusions of the report: 1. The existing street system surrounding the proposed development functions adequately. 2. Key intersections will continue to function adequately after the development with no significant decrease in the level of service. In summary, Mr. Watson concluded that based on the findings of the traffic and market studies for the site and the information presented, Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods are convinced that the proposed development will satisfy a community need and be an appropriate and valuable reuse of the site. Further, the developers are prepared to pay for the off -site modifications to the surrounding street system as recommended by Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Public Comment Mayor Richards acknowledged receipt of the following correspondence: 1. April 15, 1993 - Letter from SuperAmerica expressing concern about traffic generated by the.development. 2. April 16, 1993 - Letter from Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. expressing concerns about the proposed high intensity use and its impact upon the area. 3. Undated letter from Karen Roach, 5048 Richmond Drive, in favor of a Rainbow Foods store in this location but expressing concerns mainly about lighting, noise, and traffic from the proposed development. Karen Roach, 5048 Richmond Drive, commented that although the lighting.issue -has.. been addressed she still has concerns about noise, trespassing and traffic. John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, said he was the newly elected president of the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association, and on behalf of the Association asked that the Council not amend the Comprehensive Plan and not grant rezoning. Concerns of the neighborhood included safety, noise from the loading docks, odor from the restaurant, lighting and traffic congestion on Eden Avenue. Vernal LeVoir, 5401 Richmond Lane, objected to the lights from the development and noise that would be generated from the restaurant. Jane Stresnak, 5400 Richmond Lane, said the existing road system is confusing and she has directed many people on how to get onto T.H. 100. The increased traffic will only add to the number of confused drivers in their neighborhood. Dan Shebuski, owner of Edina Pet Hospital, said he was thinking of expanding his building and was concerned that the proposed restaurant would block exposure of his business. Also, he said he needed to' maintain access to the rear of his building which he now has by agreement with Lewis Engineering. Jack Abrahamson, 5209 Richwood Drive, said he was opposed because he did not feel that a fast food restaurant and a supermarket store belong on that site because of the traffic problems that will be created. Dorothy Lodahl, 5201 Richwood Drive, said she does not have a car and walks to get her groceries. She said added traffic would only make this more difficult. Steve Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, commented that there is only one way out of his neighborhood and there are existing traffic problems because the street angle is too sharp on the downgrade. Ted Giannobile, said he was the owner of the TSC Office building and was the closest property owner to the proposed development. He said the existing site is an eyesore and he would like to see the Rainbow project work because nothing has happened with previous proposals. He acknowledged that concerns of the neighborhood have to be addressed. Dick Stresnak, 5400 Richwood Lane, said in addition to the traffic generated by the store's customers he questioned how the truck traffic would approach the site and the number of trucks per week making deliveries. Susan Leuthold, 5440 Richmond Drive, said the proposed development is over zealous and not feasible for the area because of the traffic it would generate. Dick Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street, commented that the noise from trucks backing to loading docks would impact the residents in his neighborhood as well as the congestion at Link /Sherwood /Eden as there is only one way in /out of their neighborhood. Presentation for Jerry's Enterprises. Inc. Tim Keene, Larkin- Hoffman, said he. represented Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and that he and others would address the concerns of Jerry's Enterprises related to the development proposed by Watson Construction/Rainbow Foods. Key to the proposal are traffic and land use issues. Jerry's Enterprises has made significant investments in both commercial and office facilities to serve this area and these were made in reliance on the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Redevelopment Plan. Jerry's Enterprises will undertake a multi - million dollar make -over of its existing food store this summer. From 1988 through 1990, Jerry's Enterprises in partnership with Opus Corporation worked with the City in developing various redevelopment plans for the Kunz /Lewis site. At that time the rational of the City was that commercial . uses should not jump past the school district bus facility to the south side of Eden Avenue without first providing an orderly land use transition. Attempts were made to work with the school district to redevelop the school district bus site.but nothing emerged and the development plans were dropped. Mr. Keene said the primary concern is that the proposed development is "too much" and would impose a high velocity, high volume 24 -hour per day operation into an existing neighborhood with surrounding businesses that serve that neighborhood. He submitted that the Final Development Plan for 5.113 West 50th Street approved by Council this date will generate new traffic to the area and the Watson/Rainbow proposal should be considered with that in mind. The land use issue is one of compatibility with the existing land use patterns and the City should consider more appropriate, non - intensive commercial uses or alternative uses such as have been proposed over the last decade. Mr. Keene requested that the proposed development not receive encouragement from the Council and that the Council continue to pursue other compatible redevelopment proposals which address the entire area. Blair Tremair, planning consultant, said he was asked to look at the basic issue of comprehensive planning. He submitted the following objections to the proposed development project: 1) It would negatively impact the neighborhood character because of the traffic, significant public subsidy, i.e. traffic control, street re- arrangements, intrusion by high intensity use, intense asphalt, and odors and trespassing related to the fast food restaurant. 2) The Rainbow Foods store will become a regional store and shopped by people outside of Edina. 3) The Comprehensive Plan says that spot zoning to allow the introduction of a particular use should be avoided where possible. 4) This site is not the only location where a Rainbow Foods store could go. 5) The current property owner is not being denied a reasonable use of the property under the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. Eventually, the owner will connect with a developer who can introduce a lower intensity use. 6) Proposal does not meet the Rainbow Foods criteria in that it is not located on arterial road and does not have visibility. Mr. Tremair concluded that there are better uses for this property and depending on the policy of the City he suggested that the City consider clearing the site to resolve the aesthetic issue. He said redevelopment will find its way for this property with a less intensive use. Glen Van Wormer, traffic engineer with Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, said his firm was asked to review the area and the traffic analysis prepared by Barton - Aschman and give an opinion as to will the development fit and what will be some of the traffic problems and transportation concerns. He said there is no question that traffic volumes will increase significantly and that the numbers used by Barton - Aschman are conservative as presented. More importantly, the levels of service have been calculated based on development traffic and existing traffic. Not addressed is what will be there 10 years from now. In the metropolitan area traffic grows on streets at the rate of 2 -4% per year. With only a one percent growth, traffic on Vernon Avenue would go from 13,000 to 16,500. Mr. Van Wormer said that Eden Avenue is not a major street, has a number of driveways and also school bus traffic four times a day. The Link /Sherwood intersection has some sight restrictions and is the only way out of the adjacent residential neighborhood. Traffic coming off Vernon desiring to make a left turn into SuperAmerica,will have difficulty. There is also the potential that the school bus site will redevelop generating additional traffic. With regard to restriping Eden Avenue so that the center lane would function as a two way turn lane, he submitted that although such lanes work well there are potential problems when there are heavy uses, numerous driveways and curves. The site itself has potential operational problems., i.e.,only 50 feet from the street to the point where the vehicles have to turn either right or left and trucks will have.a lengthy on -site trip to the rear loading bays. In conclusion, Mr. Van Wormer said the development would create some operational concerns that the City should carefully evaluate. Finally, Mr. Keene submitted that ample testimony has been given in support of the proposition that the proposed development is not compatible with the area and requested that the application be denied in favor of a redevelopment scheme that would be more appropriate to the neighborhood and to the existing transportation network. Gordon Lewis, owner of Lewis Engineering, commented that, while he understood the opposition of Jerry's Enterprises to the proposed development, he felt he was being held hostage by the situation as previous proposals for the site had not proceeded and he is paying $58,000 in real estate taxes each year. He said there will be redevelopment here and although people do not like change something will happen. He submitted that the proposed development would be a quality project but that the decision as to the best use of the land was up to the Council. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards commented that the Council has spent a considerable amount of time on this site and other sites in the Grandview Redevelopment District. The issue is not necessarily one of the proposed land use as on various occasions the Council has considered proposals for multi - residential, industrial or commercial. Any number of land uses may well work and be consistent with surrounding neighborhood and adjacent uses. The question is how much development is appropriate for the site and the existing infrastructure for the area. Before considering an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, he recommended that the Council hire a consultant to sift and sort through all the information that has been presented and to advise the Council, from a neutral position and with the public's interest in mind, on exactly what are the major issues relating to the proposed development. Mayor Richards submitted that Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. has been one of the best corporate citizens of Edina and that public money has been invested in the Grandview District for public improvements to the infrastructure. The Council must assure that whatever is done on the Lewis/Kunz sites will not jeopardize what has,been done in the District since it was created. Member Smith said he agreed that the Council needs to have the advice of an independent consultant to support whatever decision is ultimately made. Member Rice stated that, while he was not inclined to support the proposed development, he concurred that in view of the number of residents who had expressed concern about the traffic, the recommendations of a consultant would be enlighting. He suggested that the analysis include the reasonable projection of the projects approved for the Regis properties earlier in order to ascertain the overall impact of traffic for whatever proposal might come before the Council in the future. Member Paulus commented that development on the subject property would be as dense a use as allowed by ordinance because the land value is too high. Other proposals have failed because the land cost made those projects not feasible under the City's restrictions. She concurred that traffic is the core issue and suggested that any independent study include all potential land uses for the site. Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing and to authorize staff to retain BRW, Inc. as consultant for the City to analyze the traffic impact of the proposed Watson/Rainbow Foods development for the Lewis/Kunz sites, to include impact of potential land uses for the sites, and to also include traffic impact from the Regis site projects and report back to the Council at the May 17, 1993, meeting. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO 1993 -5 ADOPTED (AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND 1230 TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS): SECOND READING WAIVED Assistant Manager Hughes reminded Council that at the meeting of April 5, 1993, draft Ordinance No. 1993 -5 (Amending Section 1200 and.Section 1230 of the City Code to Permit Pushcarts on Public sidewalks) was considered by Council and several revisions were recommended which have now been incorporated into the amendment. Council also discussed charging a fee for the issuance of a permit. The Health Department already charges a fee of $120.00 per year for a push cart license. Staff felt that the fee should adequately cover the cost incurred by the City in issuing a permit and therefore no additional fee is recommended. Mayor Richards recommended that a sunset provision be included so that Council could review the ordinance before the,next licensing year. Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -5 as follows, with waiver of second reading: ORDINANCE 30. 1993 -5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND SECTION 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS IN THE 50TH AND FRANCE COMMERCIAL AREA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 1200.02 is amended by adding a new paragraph as follows: "P. Pushcarts as defined in Section 720 of this Code placed on sidewalks and public walkways within the area included in the plan prepared by the ERA entitled 050th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to Subsection 1230.02 of this Code." Section 2. Paragraph R. of Subsection 1230.02 is amended as follows: "R. Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy astreet to sell any farm produce or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling of services. The prohibition in this paragraph shall not apply to the sale of food and beverages from pushcarts, as defined by Section 720 of this Code, located on sidewalks and other public walkways within the area Included in the plan prepared by the BRA entitled, "50th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to this paragraph. 1. In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued for a pushcart unless the following requirements are met: a. The pushcart must be licensed in accordance with Section 720 of this Code. b. The applicant for a permit must possess a valid food establishment license or take -out food license, pursuant to Section 720 of this Code, for a food establishment located in the 50th and France commercial area. Grandview Area Traffic Study Update City of Edina Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2) Prepared for: City of Edina . Housing and Redevelopment Agency 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Prepared by: BRW, Inc. Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...... ............................... INTRODUCTION . ............................... . EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................... Existing Land. Uses ........................... Existing Transportation System. .................. . f Existing Traffic Volumes ........................ PLANNED ROADWAY SYSTEM .................. . PROPOSED/EXPECTED CONDITIONS .................. TRIP GENERATION ............................... TRIP DISTRIBUTION .............................. SITE- GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS ...... POST - REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC FORECASTS ......... TRAFFIC ANALYSES ............................. Capacity Analysis ............................ Sunday Morning Capacity Analysis ................ Signal Warrant Analysis ........................ Queuing Analysis ............................ Accident Analysis ............................ GEOMETRIC ALTERNATIVES FOR EDEN AVENUE ...... SECONDARY ACCESS FOR AREA SOUTH OF EDEN AVENUE ... ............................... CONCLUSIONS ... ............................... RECOMMENDATIONS ............................. APPENDIX ...... ............................... Al2$!I i 1 5 5 5 10 13 14 17 22 25 28 31 31 39 39 42 44 45 49 52 56 57 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Site Location Map ............................ 2 2 Location of Proposed/Expected Redevelopment Sites ... .. .._ ............... . 3 3 Existing Site Conditions ........................ 6 4 Existing Roadway System ....................... 7 5 Key Intersection Locations ...................... 9 6 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions at Key Intersections ............................. 11 7 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ............ 12 8 Proposed Post - Redevelopment Conditions ............ 15 9 Expected Directional Distribution of Retail Traffic Within Grandview Area ................... 26 10 Site - Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts at Key Intersections ........................... 27 11 Post Rainbow Foods Development PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts at Key Intersections ............... 29 12 Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts at Key Intersections .................... 30 13 Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods South Access Warrant #11 Analysis .......................... 40 14 Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North Access Wan-ant #11 Analysis .......................... 41 15 Average Weekday Traffic Demand on Eden Avenue Between Sherwood Road and Arcadia Avenue ........ 46 #12931 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) 16 Eden Avenue Recommended Roadway Improvements ... 47 17 Conceptual Illustration of Secondary Roadway Connection ... ............................... 50 IA Post - Redevelopment Sunday Morning (10:00 -11:00 AM) Traffic Forecasts . _ _ . .... Appendix Simi LIST OF TABLES 1 Existing Transportation System ................... 8 2 Expected Trip Generation of Proposed Development ............................ .. 18 3 Expected Trip Generation of Proposed Development South of Eden Avenue ................. 20 4 Directional Distribution Analysis .................. 23 5 Existing Levels of Service ...................... 33 6 Levels of Service with only Rainbow Foods Development and with Market Study Distribution ...... 34 7 Levels of Service with only Rainbow Foods Development and with Trace Study Distribution ....... 35 8 Levels of Service with All Redevelopment Including Rainbow Foods and with Market Study Distribution .... 36 9 Levels of Service with All Redevelopment Including Rainbow Foods and with Trace Study Distribution ..... 37 10 Required Storage Lengths of Turn Lanes at Vernon Avenue/Link Road Intersection ............. 43 01MI SUMMARY The original Grandview Area Traffic Study was completed by BRW, .Inc. - _ for the City of Edina in April -of 1984:- The original study assumed future office developments in the areas southeast of the existing Eden Avenue/ Sherwood Road intersection, southwest of the existing Vernon Avenue/ TH 100 southbound ramps intersection and between Eden Avenue and the existing Jerry's Foods store. The traffic study was updated in 1990 by BRW, Inc. -to determine the impacts resulting from retail/office/Jerry's Foods expansion in the area between Eden Avenue and existing Jerry's Foods and retail/bus garage land uses in the area southeast of the existing Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road intersection. The area southeast of the existing Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road inter- section is currently proposed to be redeveloped to provide a Rainbow Foods Supermarket and a fast -food restaurant. The area southwest of the existing Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramps intersection is also proposed to be redeveloped to include a Blockbuster Video store, a Davanni's restaurant, a Snyder Drug store, a funeral home and a Great Clips hair salon. In addition, other minor redevelopments have recently occurred within the Grandview area that were not accounted for in the previous analysis. As a result of these proposed land use changes and potential traffic implications, the City of Edina retained BRW, Inc. to conduct a second update of the Grandview Area Traffic Study in order to address the potential traffic related issues. The conclusions and recommendations of this traffic analysis are listed below. CONCLUSIONS • The proposed Rainbow Foods/fast -food development south of Eden Avenue is expected to generate approximately 8,270 daily vehicle trips, including 297 inbound and 285 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no internal or passerby trips and TTE "supermarket" trips rates, which are likely high for this type of grocery store. .EMI i • The proposed and expected redevelopment of the four sites within the Grandview area: 1) Rainbow Foods, 2) Regis Corporation, 3) Jerry's expansion (assumed), and 4) Murphy Automotive is expected to generate approximately 15,860 daily vehicle trips, including 573 inbound and 645 outbound vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no internal or passerby trips. • A comparison of the three possible development scenarios for the area sou_ t_h of.Eden Avenue (Rainbow Foods development, medium density residential development or office /office- showroom development) indicate that the proposed Rainbow Foods development would be expected to generate significantly more traffic than the other two development alternatives. • The expected directional distribution of site - generated traffic to and from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other proposed/ expected retail development was based on a vehicle trace study conducted by BRW, Inc. The trace study was conducted by following vehicles from the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store to determine their travel routes to /from the area. The trace study distribution estimates that the major approach roadways to the redevelopment sites will be Vernon Avenue to /from the southwest (47 percent), Interlachen Boulevard (15 percent), TH 100 (16 percent) and Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east (13 percent). A market study conducted by the developers of the Rainbow Foods site estimated the directional distribution as; 20 percent to /from Vernon Avenue to the southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen Boulevard, 28 percent via TH 100 and 37 percent via Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east. This market study distribution was also analyzed in this report. • Capacity analyses indicate that the existing key intersections within the Grandview area currently operate at acceptable levels of traffic operations (LOS D or better) during the PM peak hour, with the exception of the left- turning movements from the two Jerry's Foods access drives onto southbound Vernon Avenue, which operate at LOS E and LOS F. However, field observations of these intersections indicate that the existing traffic signals at Interlachen Boulevard and Link Road create enough gaps in the Vernon Avenue traffic stream to allow these movements to occur with only moderate delays, and, accident analysis indicate that there have not been accident problems at these locations. 812831 ii r In addition, the capacity analyses of the existing conditions also indicate that the southbound to eastbound left- turning movement at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently operates at capacity. • Capacity analyses of the post - redevelopment PM peak hour traffic conditions, with either the trace study or market study distributions, indicate 'that each of the key intersection locations should continue to operate at an acceptable level of service, with the exception of the three movements noted above as being deficient in the existing conditions.__ These movements are likely to continue to operate at unacceptable levels and to decline in the post - redevelopment conditions. • A capacity analysis was also conducted for the expected post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) Sunday morning traffic conditions to determine if patrons of the Our Lady of Grace Church would be expected to encounter difficulties in exiting onto Eden Avenue during the Sunday morning grocery shopping period. The analysis indicated that the exiting movements from the church access onto Eden Avenue should operate at an acceptable level (LOS C) during the Sunday morning period. • Queuing analyses indicate that the 200 feet of available storage distance on the east approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection is :expected to be exceeded during the post - Rainbow Foods development conditions with either the trace study or market study distributions. The expected traffic queues from the east approach left turn lane may block left - turning traffic to and from Sherwood Road, which would provide the area south of Eden Avenue with only right in/right out access during the PM peak period. Queuing analyses also indicate that the right turning movements on the east and south approaches and the left- turning movement on the north approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection may be deficient in the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period. • The forecasted post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) traffic demand on Eden Avenue is expected to exceed the capacity of a two - lane roadway. However, a three -lane roadway with a two -way left turn lane (TWLTL) should adequately accommodate the expected traffic demand. • The construction of a second access roadway to and from the Sherwood neighborhood, south of Eden Avenue, would be desirable for public safety reasons (emergencies) and because the existing access roadway (Sherwood Road) may be blocked during a large portion of the PM peak hour. The construction of this roadway will require cooperation from Rainbow Foods as it will likely impact their development plans. This traffic study concluded that the future traffic operation within the Grandview area of the City of Edina will be acceptable, with or without the proposed redevelopment within this area (including the Rainbow Foods development), if the recommendations within this report are implemented. RECON O ENDATIONS • Widen Eden Avenue from Sherwood Road to the TH 100 South- bound on -ramp to a 44 -foot urban section (three 12 -foot lanes and 4-foot shoulders) with a center two -way, left -turn lane. • Provide a secondary access to the Sherwood neighborhood via a new road that would be located between the existing Soo Line Railroad right -of -way and the proposed Rainbow Foods store. The right -of- way for this access roadway would need to be negotiated with Rainbow Foods. • Provide an exclusive right turning lane into the proposed Rainbow Foods site off of Eden Avenue. _ • Monitor the traffic demands at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection following the Rainbow Foods development and adjust the ' traffic signal timing if necessary. • Install signage near the existing Super - America access drives onto Link Road instructing motorists queued on Link Road not to physically block left -turn access in/out of Super - America. • Monitor the accident conditions at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection, particularly the westbound to southbound left - turning movement, and construct an exclusive left turn lane with protective signal phasing, if necessary. •1MI iv INTRODUCTION Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods propose to redevelop 8.2 acres within- the City-of Edina -to- include a 65;900- square - foot- grocery store -and- a 4,800 - square -foot fast -food restaurant. The proposed redevelopment: site is located southeast of. the Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road intersection within the Grandview area of the City of Edina. The property is currently zoned Planned Industrial District (PID) and contains two buildings that are or have been consistent with this designation. The proposed redevelop - ment would raze the two existing industrial -type buildings and construct 'the two proposed retail buildings. This would require a rezoning of the property to Planned Commercial District (PCD). The Grandview area of the City of Edina is bounded on the east by Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100), on the west by. Grandview Avenue, on the north by Interlachen Boulevard and on the south by Richwood Drive (Figure 1). In addition to the proposed Rainbow Foods development, there are other areas within the Grandview_ area that are currently planned or expected to redevelop. These "other" sites include the future redevelopment of the Regis Corporation site, located southwest of the Vernon Avenue/TH 100 Southbound Ramps intersection, the future redevelopment of the area immediately north of Eden Avenue and south of existing Jerry's Foods and the current construction of an automotive store one block west of the Vernon AvenuetInterlachen Boulevard intersection on the north side of Vernon Avenue (Figure 2). As a result of concerns by City staff regarding traffic - related issues within the Grandview area, BRW, Inc., was retained to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed and expected redevelopments and to compare these impacts with those documented in the 1984 Grandview Area Traffic Study (BRW, Inc.), the 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Study Update (BRW, Inc.) and the 1993 Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study (Barton - Aschman). This report would then serve as an updated version of the Grandview Area Traffic Study. This study documents the existing traffic conditions within the Grandview area, estimates the traffic generated by the proposed Rainbow Foods redevelopment and the other expected redevelopments, distributes and assigns these traffic volumes to roadways adjacent to the developments, and evaluates key intersections and access points related to the sites. The UJPT -M] Site "T"OF Location Map 4" May 1993' - NZ-f- ST. Y ga cc J WOOD �Z LA. Q- W_ Q > W w w o . a Y 4 Q > Vy O, •. � 5T. vQ o > W ►- m X13. J Cr Cr o o _., R o a cr, W. 48th" S T:. Y Z. HOLLYW000 > a RD. o° 14. Cr ORCHARD �- L A. 8L VD. a uj 20 W; ' 49th f ST, > > L z pss W 5 s t N .58 -• o r Cr Cr a a Y Cr J z " `�' o o a_ a X m U 52nd. PROPOSED 3 ST. _ AUTOMOTIVE 100 STORE SITE E z az C 2 . �` 4 Cr o_ 21: EDE R ST. Cf 'Cr. cf� .►o�� ly ,.., a VER MONT H . - NZ-f- ST. Y ga cc J WOOD �Z LA. Q- W_ Q > W w w o . a Y 4 Q > Vy O, •. � 5T. vQ o > W ►- m X13. J Cr Cr o o _., R o a cr, W. 48th" S T:. Y Z. HOLLYW000 > a RD. o° 14. Cr ORCHARD �- L A. 8L VD. a uj 20 W; ' 49th f ST, > > L z pss W 5 s t N .58 -• o r Cr Cr a a Y Cr J z " `�' o o a_ a X m U 52nd. PROPOSED 3 ST. _ AUTOMOTIVE 100 STORE SITE E z az C 2 . �` 4 Cr o_ 21: EDE R ST. Cf 'Cr. cf� .►o�� ly ,.., May 1993 WINDSOR�� ; Rll v- w z)ur 158 AVE. Woo KENT ' • W. o 90 0 22. 56th ST. a > a 0 8R A 23. YVONNE 9�� > Z > Melody TER. f -P4RK� a N a 24 RD, W. [7tj �, T. 23. Lake > _ SITE ° W PROPOSED gAth Location of. CM OF EDIN A Proposed /Expected a �' Redevelopment Sites TER. May 1993 W > >1. • ' > o, GRID GE - i o o W z -� Q a a J .� O X o kj z wOO`0 a1p�( a `o'' ; o N o a 16. �` P � C Q' o� n17 W � 18. _ Q \ Woo OA • MORNINGSIDE o 90 > a > a 0 8R A 4 /2 ST. Z s, SITE N EXPECTED W Y REDEVELOPMENT SUNNY SITE a W PROPOSED gAth Lake RAINBOW FOODS ' SITE a W > >1. • ' > o, GRID GE - i o o W z -� Q a a J .� O X o kj z wOO`0 a1p�( a `o'' ; o N o a 16. �` P � C Q' o� n17 W � 18. _ Q 29. AvrL.. Woo OA PROPOSED LA• BF .REGIS WOO DALE F REDEVELOPMENT 0* SITE N EXPECTED REDEVELOPMENT w SITE a W PROPOSED Lake RAINBOW FOODS ' SITE a W. Harvey GOLF TER. LAKEViEW DR. i uJ OAK O DR. " c W. 55 LEX INGTON wIN D ST. z IVE W. 0 56 th �° a ' -) PL a a TOWER r ST. S0. VIEW LA. WOODLAND s a� conclusions of the traffic analyses are then used to develop appropriate roadway and/or traffic control improvement recommendations which will ensure adequate access and minimize traffic impacts and congestion within the Grandview area. RIMI 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING LAND USES The Grandview area is currently anchored by the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store and some ancillary retail shops, which are oriented towards Vernon Avenue (Figure 3). The other main traffic generators within the area include the Super - America and Amoco service stations/stores located in the northeastern and southeastern quadrants of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection, respectively. The existing land uses on the proposed and expected redevelopment parcels are also shown in Figure 3. The data indicate that: • The proposed Rainbow Foods development site currently contains two industrial -type buildings, Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil. The Lewis Engineering Building is currently occupied by a Unocal store. • The Regis redevelopment area currently contains two buildings owned and operated by the Regis Corporation, an office building and a building used for shipping and receiving. • The area between the existing Jerry's Foods store and Eden Avenue currently contains the Edina schools bus garage, a. car wash and a medical clinic. • The future automotive store site is currently vacant. However, the site was recently occupied by a gas station, which has since been razed. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The existing transportation system in the Grandview area is shown in Figure 4. The roadways which provide primary access to the area are listed in Table 1, below, along with the functional classification, responsible governmental agency, and current design features. #IMI 5 Intmachm OIVA a Jtfry 5 J P Jert�/s Foods i 0 Car Inlc wa! L SA Amoco e dins Lewis tnla En9• e�eelc Design Tsc 7 a Kunr J 0° I CMOF EDINA May 1993 Eden Cl Whoa 0�' V � Oi i i, i y V u u . j mr-In al� Existing Site Conditions Interlachen Blvd. 1__i ,� u nr�n a1 ❑ Jl�y '' O 9 5hlpping Receiving C J � No. cease ' �y JRemy �. ✓ City of Bldg Edins FUMIC J 'S EF= Wort Acce88 Nbrkri Car ; Ink Wash Edins i ❑ Due GA ; Due nage i Amoco ; t'y Lewis ❑ o mkMTC Eng. Bumm Oie` Only ; J ern T5C Office Kunz � on Eden Arcle � Aur � ORice � Greca yyti� ; Church Legend: EDINA May 1 993 Existing Roadway System. Traffic Signal ® '\ %'V off. Aw ®� TABLE 1 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Functional Roadway Current Design Roadway Classification Jurisdiction Features TH 100 Vern Avenue Eden Avenue Link Road Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Collector Mn/DOT Hennepin County City of Edina/ MSA-- -- - - City of Edina/ MSA. 4-Lane Freeway 4-Lane Divided 2 -Lane 2 -Lane Interlachen Blvd. Minor Arterial Hennepin County 2 -Lane Arcadia Avenue Collector City of Edina 2 -Lane . Grange Road/ City of Edina 2 -Lane Wilson Road Sherwood Road City of Edina 2 -Lane Regional access is .provided by TH 100. Subregional access is provided via Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. Local access is provided via. Eden Avenue, Link Road, Arcadia Avenue, Grange Road/Wilson Road and Sherwood Road. The major or "key" intersections within the Grandview area are shown in Figure 5 and listed below. • Vernon Avenue/Link Road • Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods South Access • Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North Access • Vernon AvenuelInterlachen Boulevard • Vernon AvenuefM 100 Southbound Ramps • 50th Street/Grange Road • Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road • Eden Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Eden Avenue/Wilson Road The existing approach geometrics and traffic control at each of these nine key intersections is shown in Figure 6. The data indicate that four of these key intersection locations (the Vernon Avenue intersections with Link Road, Interlachen Boulevard, the TH 100 Southbound Ramps and Grange Road) are currently controlled by traffic signals and two locations are currently four -way stop - controlled (the Eden Avenue intersections with Arcadia Avenue and Grange/Wilson Road). The remaining "key" intersections are controlled by stop signs on the minor street approaches. 01MI 8 ►rrterladm Blvd. u u U ; ; - 5hlpping l a � Recdving J c ; J ' Y imp Q u City of ce Jere Edina ��' f Fwds r e J ; Wbrke m � O tnk Wash . a co. 1 Edlna SholGarage ; SA ' Elt' dlna Lewte ; ,�Or /`Olnw Ems' C Mr.J fkeyn TSC Offi OFR , ce Kunz � 1 OA i J Eden � Arch Our Lacb ' of Grace �M i Church till" 4 Via►A,m e v EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BRW, Inc., conducted turning movement traffic counts at each of the nine "key" intersection locations from 4 :00 to 6:30 p.m. during April of 1993. The data indicated that the PM peak hour at most of these intersections currently occurs from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m.. The PM peak hour turning movement traffic volumes at each of the nine key intersection locations are shown in Figure 6. The existing - average daily traffic -(ADT) volumes on the primary roadways within the Grandview area are shown in Figure 7. The data indicate that the existing ADT volumes on Vernon Avenue south of Link Road and on Eden Avenue west of Arcadia Avenue are approximately 14,500 vehicles per day (vpd) and 6,500 vpd, respectively. 11MI 10 _.. A—._ . b 11 r #1 �7 l� Fy' �!� � v E 419 NAV .S 4'j9 moo-. r O � Nm� #4 !1 #7 Legend: O Traffic Signal ,: Stop Sign Source: Traffic =rft and field A- obsmations, April 1993, BRW, Inc 1993. i i lie #2 o � r r � .- e0o 610 190 480 24 W � D a } \ N b m Jt� vo A�!* 20 29 #8 Existing PM Peak Hour °""°� Traffic Conditions at E D I NA -Key Intersections 65 A�, North #3 Access R VERNON AVE •— ie0 78 ns 0 100 o s 0j #6 �' S5 EVEN AVE V c #9 Irlt'erfachen Blvd. j O ' a 5 J JRamp Jen�le ' Foods i 0 Car Ink Edina 0 �JGt'Ipol6 BIM Gan�ge 5A `A .. poi. I Amoco e� dine LaNe ' Ooffice �eM ; J � �C6 Kurtz I on ; boo �a U ; atite orflce ; u Whee. 4k,- ; N °r6 A ' Source. MIy/Dot 1990 Traffic Flow Maps & April 1993 Hose Counts by City of Edina. cm OF EDINA AAay 1993 L-j u u r-1 7-1 r-1 ; ; CltyoF � Edtna ; FLWfr. ; Nbrke IL Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 4� d PLANNED ROADWAY SYSTEM Discussions with the City of Edina, Hennepin County and Mn/DOT _ indicate that [here are no major roadway or traffic control improvements currently planned for the Grandview area. The Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection is currently under construction to replace the traffic signal equipment. However, there will be no geometric or traffic control changes. ras» 13 PROPOSED/EXPECTED CONDITIONS Site plans have been submitted to the City of Edina for three of the four previously identified redevelopment sites within - the- Grandview area. These proposed redevelopments are shown in Figure 8 and summarized in the following paragraphs. Area Southeast of the Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road Intersection • Raze the two existing on -site buildings. • Construct a 65,900 -square-foot Rainbow Foods grocery store. • Construct a 4,800 - square -foot fast -food restaurant. Area Southwest of the Vernon Avenue/TH 100 Southbound Ramos Intersections • Replace Regis Corporation office (approximately 9,000 square feet) with funeral home land use. • Renovate the existing Regis Corporation Shipping/Receiving building (approximately 34,120 square feet) to a 17,150 -square-foot building with four retail- oriented land uses; a 3,700 -square-foot restaurant, a 8,150 -square-foot drugstore, a 1,600 -square-foot hair salon and 3,700 square feet of other retail. • Construct a new 6,400 -square-foot building north of the existing Regis Corporation Shipping/Receiving building to be used as a video store. Automotive Service/Store • Construct an automotive service store of approximately 7,600 square feet which provides ten service bays. Recent redevelopment plans have not been received for the area between the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store and Eden Avenue, which is now occupied by the school bus garage. However, redevelopment of this site is envisioned by the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan. For analysis •1MI 14 t , , Interlachen Blvr1 L u , , iirry y ■-° deo IStoro Murplr�'s Auto � - - - n -' Retell Sho e ' S C o $ L R e II o� J� u r- rke ; J market , , Raul Fbad , goo iurant I alnbow , =do . Our LAW , L, ofGrea a,�ti o; moo, purposes, the site plan proposed in the 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Study Uodate was assumed for this area. This redevelopment proposal would include razing the existing Edina school bus garage, car wash and medical clinic buildings and constructing a 15,000- square -foot supermarket expansion'of Jerry's Foods, 8,620 square feet of other retail and 61,120 square feet of office space. .IWI 16 TRIP GENERATION The expected trip generation to and from a site is a function of the size and- character of the - developments The projected- number of vehicular trips to /from each of the four redevelopment'sites were calculated by using the national average trip rates documented in the 1987 and 1991 Trip Generation Manuals published -by -the Institute of Transportation Engineers (TTE). A summary of the estimated traffic generation to and from the proposed and expected redevelopment sites within the Grandview area are shown in Table 2. The data indicate that the redevelopment of the four sites, with land uses as identified in Figure 8 and intensities as noted in Table 2, would be expected to generate approximately 15,860 vehicle trips, including 1,218 trips during the PM peak hour. These generation projections provide a worst -case estimate of the actual number of new trips that would be imparted to the adjacent roadway system because these projections: 1. Do not account for internal or linked trip - making. Internal trip - making occurs when trips to two or more land uses within a site are combined into a single multi- purpose trip. 2. Do not account for passerby trips. Passerby trips are defined as trips that currently use the street that would have passed by without the development. The TTE Trip Generation Manual estimates that passerby trip percentages for smaller retail land uses range from 20 to 50 percent. 3. Assume that the proposed Rainbow Foods store will generate trips at the same rates as a typical grocery store or supermarket. The Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study prepared by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc., in March of 1993, documented expected trip rates for the proposed Rainbow Foods store of 65.6 ADT, 2.32 PM peak hour inbound and 2.52 PM peak hour outbound. These rates were based on actual sales information from three other similar Rainbow Foods stores within the Metropolitan area. •�� 17 TABLE 2 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 RATES # TRIPS iLAND -------------- - - - - -- ----=--------- - - - - -- i .PARCEL, USE UNIT QUANTITY ADT PM IN. PM OUT ADT PM IN PM OUT .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . INORTH SUPERMARKET S.F. 15,000. 125.5 4.50 4.32 1880 6B 65 i IOF RETAIL S.F. 8,620. ..40.7' 2.40 2.40 350 21 21 (EDEN AVE. OFFICE S.F. 61,120. 15.5 0.33 1.80 950 20 110 I SUBTOTAL S.F. 84,740. - - 3190 109 196 .SOUTH RAINBOW FOODS S.F. 65,900. 125.5? 4.50 4.32 8270 297 285 i �1, .OF FAST -FOOD REST. S.F. 4,800. 632:1 19.00. 17.50 3 30 91 84 IEDEN.AVE. SUBTOTAL S.F. 70,700. - - - 11 300) 388 369 (REGIS VIDEO STORE S.F. 6,400. 40.7 2.40 2.40 !CORPORATION RESTAURANT S.F. 3,700. 40.7 2.40 2.40J !AREA DRUGSTORE S.F. 8,150. 40.7 2.40 2.40 I I HAIR STYLING S.F. 1,600. 40.7 2.40 2.40 ! 1 OTHER RETAIL S.F. 3,700. 40.7 2.40 2.40 ! 1 SUBTOTAL RETAIL S.F. 23,550. 40.7 2.40 2.40 960 57 57 ! ! FUNERAL HOME # ## S.F. 9,000. 7.7 0.34 0.30 70 4 3 SUBTOTAL S.F. 32,550. - - - 1030. 61 60 ! 'OTHER MURPHY'S SERVICE 10 35 ## 1.46 2.01 350 15 20 !AREAS AUTOMOTIVE BAYS i i 1-------------------------------------------- - --------------------- ------------------------------------ . TOTAL -- - - - - - -- -- S- F - - - - -- 235,B 25------------------------- - - - - -- -15860 .. 573 645 # Rates based on ITE (Institute of Transporation Engineers) .\ Trip Generation Manual (1987 & 1991 Editions). �•0LQ�d Rainbow Foods rates based on March 1993 Barton- Aschman Traffic Impact Study. �. # #-Estimated assuming PM peak hour traffic is 10 % of ADT. # ## Estimated assuming church rates. In addition, a 1988 TTE Journal article entitled, "Trip Generation Rates For Different Types of Grocery Stores" indicated that warehouse -type stores characterized by limited services, 24 -hour operations and bulk purchasing exhibit lower trip rates (80.0 ADT, 3.4 PM inbound and 3.5 PM outbound) than those published in the TTE Trio Generation Manual (see Appendix). BRW, Inc., agrees that the limited services (bag and carry your own groceries) and interior character (warehouse) of a typical Rainbow Foods store result in a reduced attraction rate compared to typical full service- supermarkets, -as patrons- visit- these -type's-of-stores-less- often but spend more time and money per trip than at a typical supermarket. However, although BRW may support the use of reduced rates to those documented in the 1988 TTE Journal study, there is no independent data to support the use of the rates used in the Barton - Aschman report. 4. Assume that the area southeast of the Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road intersection will develop with the currently proposed Rainbow Foods and fast -food restaurant land uses. This area has been analyzed with different land use alternatives in each of the two previous Grandview Area Traffic Studies. In addition to the current Rainbow Foods development proposal, this area is also currently being considered for medium density residential development or office/ office- showroom development. The comparative trip generation characteristics of these three land use alternatives is documented in Table 3. The data indicate that the development of this area with the proposed Rainbow Foods store and fast -food restaurant would result in substantially more vehicle trips than the other land use alternatives. The trip generation analysis is also conservative in that it does not account for trips generated by the existing facilities that are to be razed in order for the redevelopment of these sites to occur. However, the existing vehicle trip generation to and from these industrial facilities is assumed to be small. These factors, when combined, should result in a very conservative estimate of the vehicular trip generation to and from the redevelopment areas and the most straightforward method of analysis. If the traffic analyses indicate that the resulting conservative traffic forecasts can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway system, then any reduced forecasts caused by any combination of internal trips, passerby trips, lower Rainbow Foods trip rates and/or NIWI 19 TABLE 3 (J�' EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 JJ EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION OF PROPOSED ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------=------ DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF EDEN AVENUE /� :1 1 RATES * -- - -----------------=---- TRIPS ; f LAND f (ALTERNATIVE USE UNIT. QUANTITY ADT - PM IN PM OUT AD T PM IN PM OUT 1 f---------------------=---=--------------------------------------------------------------------- - -- - -- 1 f 1 RAINBOW FOODS S.F. 65,900. 125.5 4.50 4.32 8270 297 285 ' 1 e #1 FAST -FOOD REST. S.F. 4,B00. 632.1 19.00 17.50 91 84 f f SUBTOTAL S.F. f 70,700. `3030 ` 1.1 0 T 388 369 f 1 #2 MEDIUM DENSITY D.U. 200 5.86 0.36 0.19 1180 72 38 1. 1 RESIDENTIAL 1 f #3 OFFICE / OFFICE - S.F. 108,000. 11.8 0.25 1.36 1280 27 147 f f... 1 SHOWROOM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------- ; 9 Rates based on ITE (Institute of Transporation Engineers) Trip.Generation Manual (1987.& 1991 Editions). Rainbow Foods rates based on March 1993 Barton - Aschman Traffic Impact Study. Office / Office- Showroom trip rates based on assuming 50/50 mix of office and industrial. j 1 012831 the development of the area southeast of the Eden Avenue/Sherwood . Road intersection with one of the other land use alternatives could also be adequately accommodated. 21 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The expected directional distribution of site - generated trips to and from the - proposed Rainbow .- Foods- . store -documented -in -the March _1993_ Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study (prepared by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc.) was based on a market study of this area. The market study indicated that 37 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive from the east on Eden and Vernon Avenues, 28 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive via TH 100 and 20 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive from the southwest on Vernon Avenue (Table 4). The expected directional orientation of site - generated trips to and from the Grandview area documented in the 1984 and 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Studies (prepared by BRW, Inc.) was based on the Metropolitan Council's Regional Travel Model, which assumed land uses for this area that are more regional in nature (office, industrial, residential) than a supermarket land use. This was consistent with the previous Grandview area redevelopment scenarios as most consisted of office, office/showroom or residential redevelopments. This distribution assumes that 10 percent of the patrons arrive from the east via Eden and Vernon Avenues, 50 percent of the patrons arrive via TH 100 and 25 percent of the patrons arrive from the southwest on Vernon Avenue (Table 4). Since most of the proposed redevelopment will consist of retail- oriented land uses with more localized market areas, it is reasonable to assume that traffic to and from these redevelopment areas via TH 100 will be less than the 50 percent previously assumed in the 1984 and 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Studies. Therefore, a higher percentage of traffic to and from these sites is expected from the east and/or west. While the market study estimates a higher percentage of site trips to and from the east on Eden and Vernon Avenues, the logical reasoning for this could not be subjectively explained. Therefore, a vehicle trace study was conducted by BRW, Inc:, in order to estimate the future distribution of trips to and from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other retail - oriented redevelopment sites. This study was based on the assumption that the future directional orientation of trips to and from the proposed Rainbow Foods store would be similar to the existing distribution to and from the Jerry's Foods store. •IMI 22 TABLE 4 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I i ESTIMATED DIRECTIONAL PERCENTAGES I I1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -1 I I Vernon Ave. Wilson Rd. Arcadia Ave. I 1 (Vernon Ave. Interlachen TH 100 TH 100 & Eden Ave. (E. Fr. Rd.) (W. Fr. Rd.) Sherwood Rd. 1 ISOURCE Ito SW Blvd. to north to south to east to south to south to south TOTAL i 11984 & 1990 Grandview i iArea Traffic Studies 1 25.0 % 15.0 % 30.0 % 20.0 % 10.0 Y. 0.0 % 0.01% 0.0 % 100.0 % I I.(BRW Inc.) # I i 2 a 1 iRainbow Foods Traffic i (Study - March 1993 1 20.0 % 15.0.% 10.0 % 18.0 Y. 37.0 Y. 0.0 Y. 0.0 Y% 0.0 % 100.0 % I 1(Barton- Aschman). I i i Jerry' s Foods Exiting i iTraffic Trace Study 1 47.0 % 15.0 % - 6.0- .-X.,. 10.0 -X- 13.0 / 1.0 % 5.0,% 3.0 % 100.0 % I Apri l 1993 I(BRW, Inc.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------ # Based on Regional Travel Model for Twin Cities (Mn /DOT & Met Council). ## Based on Market Analysis documented in the March. - 1993 Rainbow Foods:Traffic.Study. # ## Based on a traffic count conducted by BRW, Inc. Y TABLE 4 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I i ESTIMATED DIRECTIONAL PERCENTAGES I I1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -1 I I Vernon Ave. Wilson Rd. Arcadia Ave. I 1 (Vernon Ave. Interlachen TH 100 TH 100 & Eden Ave. (E. Fr. Rd.) (W. Fr. Rd.) Sherwood Rd. 1 ISOURCE Ito SW Blvd. to north to south to east to south to south to south TOTAL i 11984 & 1990 Grandview i iArea Traffic Studies 1 25.0 % 15.0 % 30.0 % 20.0 % 10.0 Y. 0.0 % 0.01% 0.0 % 100.0 % I I.(BRW Inc.) # I i 2 a 1 iRainbow Foods Traffic i (Study - March 1993 1 20.0 % 15.0.% 10.0 % 18.0 Y. 37.0 Y. 0.0 Y. 0.0 Y% 0.0 % 100.0 % I 1(Barton- Aschman). I i i Jerry' s Foods Exiting i iTraffic Trace Study 1 47.0 % 15.0 % - 6.0- .-X.,. 10.0 -X- 13.0 / 1.0 % 5.0,% 3.0 % 100.0 % I Apri l 1993 I(BRW, Inc.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------ # Based on Regional Travel Model for Twin Cities (Mn /DOT & Met Council). ## Based on Market Analysis documented in the March. - 1993 Rainbow Foods:Traffic.Study. # ## Based on a traffic count conducted by BRW, Inc. I The vehicle trace study was conducted by following exiting Jerry's Foods patrons to the outer limits of the study area and denoting which roadway the patron had used to exit the study area. The trace study was conducted on April 29 and 30 during the PM peak period and consisted of 147 observations. The results of the vehicle trace study are documented in Table 4. The data indicate that the existing. PM peak hour directional orientation of trips < from Jerry's Foods is significantly higher to the southwest along Vernon Avenue and significantly lower to the east along Eden and Vernon - Avenues than -the estimated- market - study - distribution. - If-- the proposed Rainbow Foods store: exhibits a. distribution similar to the existing Jerry's Foods store, the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection would be more heavily utilized than indicated in the Barton- Aschman report. However, since Jerry's Foods and Rainbow Foods provide different levels of service (i.e., . price, free- bagging versus self - bagging, carry-out versus carry your own, etc.), it is difficult to disregard the market study distribution. Therefore, although the trace study distribution was used to distribute the site - generated traffic volumes and to prepare the traffic forecasts, the impact differences of using the market study distribution for the Rainbow Foods store and the previous studies distribution for the other land -use alternatives for the area south of Eden Avenue were also analyzed. Simi 24 SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS The expected PM peak hour trips to and from the four future redevelopment areas within the Grandview area were assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the directional orientation displayed in Figure 9 and logical and minimum travel time paths. These site- generated PM peak hour traffic volume forecasts for each of the key intersection locations are illustrated in Figure 10. I I ri�i 25 .1 6% ►nterfache" Blvd LLu u u n r-ir -1 15% ' a jt r y • Storrs 0 °3u�i . Au 2 f 1 • 1 ;Befall Sh a . J C r � Ramp a U � u ! Cttyof 4 Edlne 61dg. Public J Footle ; Wy*6 ro ' r• -- upsr market Retal ' ! 5A ( �. •, i •' Amoco I ; Fines Food E tnReetaurant I , ;F Note: Assumes no passby trips. Source: Vehicle Trace study of Jerry's Foods Traffic, BRW,Inc., April 1993. May 1993 /1 I / , /i Our Lacbr � of Gnxe •�, (lurch S' n' 5% Expected Directional Distribution C"OF of Retail Traffic E D I NA within Grandview Area 13% \ - •�rnarr /{yam iCR 15e J � Ave. 10% r, i/ e (® 0 0� i1 0 0 O� i #1 ♦e LPG c$` yERNO N r � 0� W Ro m #4 °ate J �c Coe #7 1� f r o i V #2, L) 007/4 Q -• w "�1914 �► � 30 w r Z++ VOW }�► Rw10910 0 0 01, 10910/•010 #8 °Of f 0 �` NoAh #3 do �R o VERNON AVE r .0-0/617/2 r �0 0/6/132 0/0/0/1 CP #6 Jr T �511An'0 0 r ai 2jo '� s EDENAVE. M o,•o ,o 0 #9 Legend: CL 00 /00 /00 /00 Rainbow & Fast Food Restaurant Redevelopment/ 3W 9 Q Regis Redevelopment/ E • 0 e n Car Wash,Bus Garage Redevelopment/ ' I °I Murphy Automotive < OJ T 0 Traffic Signal 0/0/24/0 0/9/010 t Stop Sign 0/02410 121/010/0 0/9/0/0 A 26910/0/0 EDEN AVE Coe Site-Generated PM Peak Hour g ma `m'°� Traffic Forecasts at #'! 0 SIS E D LNA. Key Intersections May 1 993 POST- REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC FORECASTS Post- redevelopment traffic volume forecasts were prepared - in order- to analyze the traffic impacts that the proposed redevelopment will have on the adjacent roadway system. Two sets of forecasts, were prepared;. one with only the proposed Rainbow Foods development for comparison purposes with the Barton - Aschman report (Figure 11) and one with all four sites redeveloped (Figure 12). These forecasts consist of the existing traffic volumes plus the expected traffic generation to /from the proposed development(s) and are prepared for use in intersection capacity analyses, in geometric design or redesign of streets and intersections, and in establishment of appropriate traffic control devices. SIMI 28 �?dt O 6�t #1 0 N wo Fy > yEi.Np +81 r 0 a Nmb l � � #4 9� �0 �0 Off #7 #2 b j �RNON r 810 A � O ~ 48x(81 �. C, g i tu o z l 1 to #5 e } \ 0 C* Vr i t EpENT ,+ 941 W1 941 4, zol8 3106 #8 Legend: 00 Total Traffic (00) Rainbow Foods & Fast-Food Restaurant Development Component O Traffic Signal. Stop Sign Source: Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study, March 1993, Barton- Aschman. EDINA 1 Post Rainbow Foods Development PM Peak HourTraffic Forecasts at Key Intersections r� Jerry's 6 North #3 Access Z _�X, VERNON AVE 10-- 780 'T8 775-1 i 100 N o � V #6 r 5+ 1 EpEN AVS M � � w a � o z A� #9 CL �W ENO 5 ,�. o00 0 289 0 121(121) 299 289(289) EDEN AVE 1 m r,° 3 ar $ �a CIA #10 R 0� \ S � .�' tio1f� d��ser rf 4� � r #1 CYF'� s�`► .� 5 �s41 3621 1. 1 a iiiai m #4 9� �o�o #7 Legend: 00 Total Traffic (00) Redevelopment Generated O Traffic Signal A Stop Sign 1991 #2 d �' i LL, �a00 �- 627(174 n O i tTtl51�'° 20101'x► Qr �. � g W j 4 e pr ee f 71- e vuf P��1� EOE 337111 x'210 ;1 AvE � 41101 2g(A 33918912' Soo se�,cb #8 _ Post Redevelopment PM E D I NA Peak HourTraffic Forecasts at Key Intersections Oy ,1.Ry�s 6�� North #3 Access V4 VERNON AVE r j ' 6(0) 796(21)— O -► 101(1) -+ 1 �o A, 49 do c°` l #6 �- 55101 EDEN AVE r 7r � L �o #9 Em °° �..� �� Q eta 27W91 24(24 121(121) 269(269 EDEN AVE Z m Nr 161 W #1O LL1. TRAFFIC ANALYSES CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis is an established method of objectively measuring quality of traffic flow through an intersection or along. a segment of - roadway. The intersection analysis is based on the fact that there is a maximum number of vehicles which can be accommodated by each lane approaching the intersection. This maximum number is then modified to take into account such limiting factors as the type of traffic signal operation, the intersection geometry, and the amount of turning traffic. The calculated capacity is then compared to either the existing or forecast peak hour volumes. The relationship between these values gives an indication of the quality of traffic flow. If the existing or forecast volumes are significantly less than the calculated capacity, the quality of traffic flow should be very good, with little or no congestion at the intersection. However, as the volume of traffic through the intersection approaches capacity, the quality of traffic flow drops and the amount of congestion and delay increases. Qualitatively speaking, the various levels of traffic flow through an intersection can be described as follows: Level of Service A - Light traffic, short stable queues during red signal phase, and no delay. Level of Service B - Moderate traffic, stable queues, little delay. Level of Service C - Moderate heavy traffic, moderately long but stable queues during red signal phase, moderate but acceptable delay. Level of Service D - Heavy traffic, long unstable queues, delays sometimes' become excessive. Level of Service E - Heavy flow, long queues, and excessive delays. Level of Service F - Heavily congested traffic conditions. Traffic demand greater than capacity. •12DI 31 In large metropolitan areas such as the Twin Cities, Level of Service D is usually recommended for urban intersection design as it is considered to reflect the minimum acceptable : quality of traffic flow; and Level of Service E is considered to be the actual capacity of the intersection. Capacity analyses were conducted to determine the existing and post - redevelopment levels of traffic operations during the PM peak hour at the key intersection locations. The capacity analyses were conducted by using the Operations Method outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), the current PM: peak hour traffic signal timing at each of the existing signalized - locations and the existing geometrics and - control.- The following listing summarizes the capacity analyses that were conducted: Table 5 - Existing PM peak. hour Table 6 - Rainbow Foods Development with market study distribution Table 7 - Rainbow Foods Development with trace study distribution Table 8 - All Redevelopment with market study distribution Table 9 - All Redevelopment with trace study distribution The data indicate that: The left - turning movements from the existing Jerry's Foods driveways onto southbound Vernon Avenue currently operate unacceptably, level of service (LOS) "E" and "F ", and are expected to continue to decline further (i.e., increased congestion) in the future with or without the proposed Rainbow Foods development and with either the trace study or market study distribution. However, recent field observations of these intersections during the PM peak hour indicate that the existing traffic signals along Vernon Avenue at Link Road and Interlachen Boulevard create enough gaps in the Vernon Avenue traffic stream to allow left- turning movements from these driveways to be made without excessive delays. In addition, the internal circulation within this area allows drivers who can't get out at the Jerry's Foods access locations the option of diverting to Interlachen Boulevard or Link Road. • The Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection currently operates at an acceptable level (LOS B) and will continue to operate at a high level following the Rainbow Foods development and the development of the other three redevelopment sites with either the trace study or market.study distributions. Although the westbound to southbound left- turning traffic volume and the northbound to eastbound right turning traffic volume will be noticeably greater under the trace study distribution, the level of operations at the intersection will only drop to LOS C, which is still acceptable. •EMI 32 TABLE.- 5 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE PM ---------------------------- PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF - ------------- SERVICE UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED MAJOR MINOR STREET INT. OR STREET -------------------- # INTERSECTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTROL 4 -WAY STOP LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 VERNON AVE. / LINK RD. SIGNAL B 2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F - A FOODS SOUTH ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - A E D A FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C - '. INTERLACHEN BLVD. 5 VERNON AVE. / TH 100 SIGNAL B SOUTHBOUND RAMPS b' 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B 7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD. THRU /STOP - A H - ....... A 8 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA.AVE. 4 -WAY STOP B - - - - 9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 -WAY STOP B - - - - & Southbound left turn at.capacity. TABLE b EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY.UPDATE. #2 LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ONLY -------------------------------------------------------------- RAINBOW FOODS DEVELOPMENT & WITH MARKET STUDY DISTRIBUTION PM --------------------------------- PEAK HOUR - - - - -- -- LEVELS OF - - - - - - - -- SERVICE UNSIGNALIZED - -- SIGNALIZED ---------------------------- MAJOR MINOR STREET INT. OR STREET ----------L--------- # INTERSECTION CONTROL 4 -WAY STOP LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT I VERNON AVE. / LINK RD. SIGNAL B 2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F - A FOODS SOUTH ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. " / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F E A FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C INTERLACHEN BLVD. 5 VERNON AVE. / TH 100 SIGNAL B SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B 7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD. THRU /STOP - A C _ A 9 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE. 4 -WAY STOP C 9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD. 4 -WAY STOP C 10 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A C C A RAINBOW WEST ACCESS 11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A C - A RAINBOW EAST ACCESS #.Southbound left turn at capacity. TABLE 7 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY. UPDATE #2 LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ONLY RAINBOW FOODS DEVELOPMENT & WITH TRACE STUDY DISTRIBUTION --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------- PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE ----------------------------=------- - - - - -- UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED MAJOR MINOR STREET INT. OR STREET ------=------------- # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION CONTROL 4 -WAY STOP LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT C) 1 VERNON AVE. / LINK RD. SIGNAL I C 2 VERNON AVE../ JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F - A FOODS SOUTH ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - A F E A FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C - - - - INTERLACHEN BLVD. 5 VERNON. -AVE. / TH 100 SIGNAL B SOUTHBOUND RAMPS. 6 50TH ST. 1 GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B 7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD. THRU/STOP - A D - A B EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE. 4 -WAY STOP B 9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD. 4 -WAY STOP B " 10 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A D - A RAINBOW WEST ACCESS 11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A C - A --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RAINBOW EAST 'ACCESS �C Southbound left turn at capacity. TABLE 8 i EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 LEVELS OF- SERVICE.WITH ALL REDEV. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INC. RAINBOW FOODS & WITH MARKET STUDY DISTRIBUTION PM ------------------------------------------ PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ----------------------- MAJOR MINOR STREET - - - - -- INT. OR STREET -------------------- # INTERSECTION -------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------- CONTROL 4 -WAY STOP LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT i VERNON AVE. / LINK RD. SIGNAL C - - - - 2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - C F - A FOODS SOUTH.ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F E A FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C - INTERLACHEN BLVD. 5 VERNON AVE. / TH 104 SIGNAL B - - - - SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B 7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD. THRU /STOP - A C - A 8 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE. 4 -WAY STOP C - - - - 9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON R.D.. 4 7WAY STOP C .10 .EDEN AVE.. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A C C A RAINBOW WEST ACCESS 11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A' C - A RAINBOW EAST ACCESS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Southbound & eastbound left turns at capacity. TABLE 9 EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ALL REDEV.-INC. RAINBOW FOODS ------------------------------------ -------------------------------- & WITH TRACE STUDY DISTRIBUTION PM -- - - -- ---------------- PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE ----------------------------- UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED MAJOR MINOR STREET INT. OR STREET -------------------- # -----------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------- INTERSECTION CONTROL 4 -WAY STOP LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 VERNON AVE.. /LINK RD. SIGNAL C - - - - 2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - C F - A FOODS SOUTH ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - B F E A FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C - - - - INTERLACHEN BLVD. 5 VERNON AVE. / TH 10.0 SIGNAL B - - - - SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B -N- AVE. / SHERWOOD RD. THRU /STOP - A D - A 8 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE. 4 -WAY STOP C - - - - 9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD, 4 -WAY STOP. C - - - - 10 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A D B A RAINBOW WEST ACCESS 11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - A C - A RAINBOW EAST ACCESS * Southbound & easthniinri left tiirn= In addition, these post - redevelopment levels of service are consistent with the levels documented in the Barton - Aschman traffic study for this intersection. • The Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently operates at an acceptable level (LOS Q and is expected to continue -to operate at this level through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace or market study distribution. However, the southbound left-turning movement from Interlachen to eastbound Vernon Avenue currently operates at capacity. Following the redevelopment of each of the four sites, both the southbound to eastbound left - turning movement (permissive only) and the eastbound to northbound left- turning movement (protected only) are expected to operate at capacity. • The left - turning movement from northbound Sherwood Road to westbound Link Road currently operates at level of service "B" and would be expected to continue -to operate at an acceptable level through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace (LOS D) or market study (LOS Q distributions. However, the traffic queues from the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection will very likely extend back beyond Sherwood Road. . The existing four -way stop- controlled intersections along Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue and Wilson Road currently operate with little congestion (LOS B) during the PM peak hour and are expected to continue to operate at reasonable levels (LOS Q during the post- redevelopment. conditions under either the trace or market study distributions. However, the intersections will operate better if site traffic is oriented similar to the trace study distribution. The left- turning movements from the proposed eastern and western Rainbow Foods access drives off of Eden Avenue will operate acceptably through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace study or market study distributions. This is consistent with the levels of operations documented in the Barton - Aschman report. • The remaining key intersection locations currently operate at acceptable levels and are expected to continue to operate acceptably through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace or market study distributions. The redevelopment of the area south of Eden Avenue with one of the other land use alternatives (medium density residential or office/office- showroom) would not result in a significant change in the levels of traffic operations of the key intersections within the Grandview area. However, the site access intersections would likely operate at higher levels. •IMI 38 SUNDAY MORNING CAPACITY ANALYSIS The City of Edina requested that BRW, Inc., analyze the expected Sunday morning traffic conditions along Eden Avenue following 'the completion of the .Rainbow Foods store, particularly the possible traffic conflicts between vehicles exiting the Our Lady of Grace Church and vehicles oriented towards Rainbow Foods or Jerry's Foods. This analysis was completed by preparing future post - redevelopment Sunday morning traffic forecasts and conducting a capacity analysis of the existing church access driveway onto Eden Avenue. These Sunday morning forecasts (see Appendix) were prepared by adding existing Sunday morning volumes (counted by the City of Edina in April 1993) to expected Rainbow Foods Sunday morning traffic. The resulting capacity analysis indicates that vehicles exiting the church access during the Peak Sunday morning exiting period are expected to experience moderate delays (15 - 25 seconds/ average per vehicle). However, the magnitude of these delays should be acceptable (LOS Q. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Since the installation of a traffic signal is considered as a mitigative measure for reducing traffic congestion at unsignalized intersection locations, traffic signal warrant analyses were conducted for both of the Vernon Avenue intersections with existing Jerry's Foods. Traffic signal warrant analyses determine if a traffic signal may be installed at an intersection, although the installation of a traffic signal is not required just because an intersection meets a signal warrant. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) specifies eleven traffic signal warrants, which, when met or exceeded, indicate that traffic signal installation may be appropriate. However, because of data constraints, only Warrant 11 (the Peak Hour Volume Warrant) was used in this analysis. The traffic signal warrant analyses for the Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods South Access intersection and the Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North Access intersection are shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. The data indicate that both of the intersections currently do' not meet traffic signal warrants and that both intersections are not expected to meets signal warrant-6following the proposed Rainbow Foods development. However, the Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods South Access intersection is expected to meet the Warrant 11 requirements for traffic signal installation following the redevelopment of the area between Eden Avenue and existing Jerry 's Foods, with or without the Rainbow Foods development. 01201 39 700 CM OF 99 EDINA May 1993 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods South Access ( Key I nt. #2) K MAJOR STREET Total of Both Approaches (VPH) Warrant 11 Peak Hour Volume Warrant * Note: 150 VPH Applies as the Lower Threshold Volume for a Minor Street Approach with two or More Lanes, Legend: O Existing PM Peak Hour 0 Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour with Only Rainbow Development Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour with Rainbow Development and Other Development 600 CL s 500 LU w � 400 O< 300 CZ G =3 O s 200 _47 100 CM OF 99 EDINA May 1993 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods South Access ( Key I nt. #2) K MAJOR STREET Total of Both Approaches (VPH) Warrant 11 Peak Hour Volume Warrant * Note: 150 VPH Applies as the Lower Threshold Volume for a Minor Street Approach with two or More Lanes, Legend: O Existing PM Peak Hour 0 Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour with Only Rainbow Development Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour with Rainbow Development and Other Development � O O < C,9Y OF 49 EDINA May 1993 Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North AGGeSS (Key Int. #3) 700 1 wil M Mot 300 200 WarrantNot im rpm N 400 500 6000 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 10600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET Total of both Approaches (VPH) Warrant 11 Peak Hour Volume Warrant Note. 1%rHA lies as the Lower n ho ,, Volume a Minor Street Approach wlth Two or More Lance. Legend: 0 Existing FM Peak Hour Post-Radevelopment FM Peak Hour with Only Rainbow Development Post - Redevelopment FM Peak Hour Xevelopment; with Kal6ow and Other Development. QUEUING ANALYSIS A queuing analysis was conducted to determine the required storage distances needed to adequately and safely accommodate vehicles waiting during the red portion of the traffic signal cycle at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection. A summary of this analysis is documented in Table 10. The data indicates that: • The 200 feet of available left turn storage on the east approach of the intersection _(i.e.,_ distance between Vernon_ Avenue and Sherwood Road along Link Road) is expected to be exceeded during the PM peak hour following the development of the area south. of Eden Avenue. If all of the proposed redevelopment occurs (including the Rainbow Foods store) and if this additional traffic is oriented similar to the trace study distribution, then the required left - turning storage for the westbound to southbound movement would be approximately 375 feet. This condition would block left - turning vehicles from Sherwood Road during a large portion of the PM peak period and may also block left turns in and out of the Super - America station if vehicles in the queue do not provide an opening for these movements. • The 90 feet of available right turning storage between Vernon Avenue and the Super - America access is also expected to be exceeded during the PM peak hour following the development of the area south of Eden Avenue. • The 150 feet of available left - turning storage for the north approach may also be exceeded periodically during the PM peak hour if the area south of Eden Avenue develops with the proposed Rainbow Foods store. If the area south of Eden Avenue develops with officeloff ce- showroom or medium density residential then the available left- turning storage would likely be adequate. • The available 150 feet of right turning storage on the south approach of the intersection is expected to be exceeded during the PM peak hour if the Rainbow Foods store develops and if traffic to and from the store is oriented similar to the trace study distribution. As previously noted, the traffic forecasts used in the analysis are conser- vative since they do not account for internal trips and passerby trips. If these factors are considered, the required storage distances documented in Table 10 could conservatively be reduced by 15 to 20 percent. However, even with the reduced requirements, the available turn lane storage distances on the east, north and south approaches will very likely still be deficient. MMI 42 TABLE 10 EDINA/GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2 REQUIRED STORAGE LENGTHS OF TURN LANES AT VERNON AVENUE/ LINK ROAD INTERSECTION 112831 43 North South East Approach Approach Approach Scenario Left Turn Right Turn Left Turn Right Turn Available 150' 150' (Est.) 200' 901* .................................... ....................... All redevelopment (including ....................... ..... .......... ........ ........ . . . ...... - ... .......... - ............. ............. .............. ....... ... ........ . ...... .................... ............................ ............ ........ ...... .. . ... ........ .... ............... ... ........ Rainbow Foods) with trace study ......................................... ................ .......... . . . .......... X .... ............ :3 . ... . .... ....... :1.': ............ ............ ..... . . ........... ............ ............ ............ . ............. ...... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. . . . . . . . ...... ......... . . . . ............ .. ... . ............ w...) .. ...... ............ %. ... . . . . ...... ...... . . . . .......... ... . ............. . . .. ......................... ............ ..... distribution ................................ . ....... .. ... . .. ... .. ........ . ................. ... .... .. . .. . :.:.: ... ............. ...... ............ .— . .......... ............. ............ . . . ..... ............. :. , , . ... ............ ............ ... ........... ............. ... . a ......... ........... . ........... ....... .. ............. ........ .................... ....... ............ ........... ........... - ............... .................. ........ ...... ........... . . . . . . . . . ............. ..... X.N. .... ........ .. .... ..................... ........ ........... ......................................... ............................................. .. ................................. ............... ....... Rainbow Foods with trace stud ...................... ........ .. .... . .. ......... ... ....... M ... ................ ............................ ..................... . ................. .......... : .................. ............. .. ........ ... ................... .......... :":4 ......... .. W. ................ ............ ..... ............ ............. ... .............. .................. ....... ............... ..................... 1 . .......... ... ........ 2 ................................................ distribution . . .............. ................ . ................. - .. . I. . .. . ... . .............. . .... .. . ......... .. ..... .... . ... ............... ....... ........................ ............... . . ... ....... ... ....... ......................... . . ............. . . ..... ... . . . . .. ..... .......... ................. .... .... ..... .......... ......... . ........... ............ ............ ............. ............. ............ X ............ ... .. .............. .............. . Rainbow Foods with market ... ............. . .... ............... 150 ...... . . .......... ......... . ........ . . ................ ........................................ .......... . . ........ ..... ............ .......... .... 5. study distribution ..... ......... ....... .. y . ........ . .. ...... All redevelopment (including 130' ........ .................................................................................. . . ............... ... ...... .... .... .... ..... 2-10 .... .... . . ................. ........ . ..... ..... ................... .................. ............. ........... .......... ......... .... . ..... .... ........ . ... ... ?.. ............ ....... . ..... . . ..... ... . .. .... ................ ........ ...... ............... .... ........ ............................... officeloffice-showroom south of (1001) (80') ................. ... ..... . .............. ............ -:17T.Y. . . . ...... Eden Avenue) with previous .......................................... ....................................... ............ ............... ........................ W...................... ........................ ................................. ........................................................................... I ........................... .......................... .... . ........ ....... ..... ... . .. ............ ... ... ....................... .... .... % ............... .. ................... I ........... ............................ . ..... ................................ ........ ........................................ .... ... Grandview studies distribution . ........... . .... . .......... . . ... .. . .... .. ......... ..................................................... ............... ....... .................................. ... ... .. ......... ........... ......................... 112831 43 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Accident data was obtained from Hennepin County for the section of Vernon Avenue (County Road 158) between Link Road and Arcadia Avenue for the 1989 through 1991 time period. Analysis of this data indicated the following: There appears to be no current accident problems at the Vernon Avenue intersections with Link Road, the Jerry's Foods access drives and- Arcadia - Avenue.. There were twenty reported accidents at the Vernon Avenue) Interlachen Boulevard intersection during this three year time period. Based on 1990 average daily traffic volumes, this accident total equates to an accident rate of 1.03 accidents per million vehicles entering the intersection (Acc./MEV). This compares to a typical signalized intersection accident rate of approximately 1.5 AccJMEV. Therefore, the number of accidents at the intersection do not indicate a problem. However, further analysis of the type of accidents indicates that there have been a relatively high percentage of left - turning accidents at the intersection, particularly with vehicles travelling southwest on Vernon Avenue turning left in front of oncoming traffic. A review of the intersection geometrics suggests that the high percentage of left turn accidents may be the result of the following factors: The skewed angled of the intersection limits sight distance for vehicles attempting this left- turning movement. Field observations of the intersection indicate that drivers making this movement have from 5 to 7 seconds of sight distance depending on the speed of the approaching vehicles. This compares with the minimum acceptable gap value of 5.5 seconds for this movement as documented in the 1985 Highway Caaacity Manual. Therefore, the existing sight distance is marginal at best. The approach lane for this movement is a combination left/through lane. Therefore, left - turning drivers in this lane may be more aggressive than usual (i.e., using inadequate gaps in the oncoming traffic stream) because they are fearful of being struck from behind by a through vehicle. 012931 44 GEOMETRIC ALTERNATIVES FOR EDEN AVENUE The existing Eden Avenue currently operates as a -two 36= foot =wide roadway between Sherwood Road and the southbound TH 100 on -ramp. Based on the current daily traffic. demand along Eden Avenue of approximately 6,500 vehicles per day and the roadway segment level of service guidelines shown in Figure 15, this segment of Eden Avenue currently operates at LOS B. However, following the completion of the Rainbow Foods development and the redevelopment of the other three Grandview area sites, this segment of Eden Avenue is expected to operate at unacceptable levels if the current two -lane section is maintained. Therefore, the future implementation of an alternative roadway section will be necessary. Figure 15 shows the impacts of three different conservative analysis scenarios on three and four lane roadways; • One based on the traffic forecasts documented in this report which assume no internal or passerby trips and ITE trip rates for the proposed Rainbow Foods store (very conservative). • One based the assumption that there will be a 20 percent reduction in generated trips due to internal and passerby trips (less conservative). • One based on the Rainbow Foods trip rates documented in the Barton- Aschman report and the assumption that there will be a 20 percent reduction in generated trips due to internal and passerby trips (least conservative). For the purposes of this analysis, it was considered appropriate to utilize the "least conservative" numbers. The data indicate that the implementation of a three -lane Eden Avenue with a center two -way left turn lane (TWLTL) would result in acceptable levels of operations (LOS D) through the redevelopment of the Grandview area. and that the construction of a four lane Eden Avenue would likely result in excess capacity and overbuilding of the roadway. 112831 45 20,000 .:............ 18,000 16,000 ........................... ............................... 14 000 .......................... ............................... N..... .......... -- .... - ..... -* .. - - - - -- 12,000 LOS F ........ ........... 15000vpd Is 10,000 F �• - .1 -� . . ... (5 .... . ......... All Redevelopments /13,800 vpd E.. ::........ O.... .:. Just Rainbow ......... 8,000 ...............X., ;::::;: <::::;:<::«:::: »:::; ;;; ...... 13,300 vpd Q U EDINA May 1993 ............................... LOS F ............................... 2 -1-ane 3 -1-ane 4 -1-ane Undivided Type of Roadway Average Weekday Traffic Demand { on Eden Avenue Between Sherwood yv`> Road n a d Arcadia Avenue ........ ...... 6,500 vpd Existing Legend: Assumes No Internal or Passerby Trips and ITE Rates for Rainbow Foods. Assumes 20% Reduction for Internal and Passerby Trips. — — With Barton - Aschman Trip Rates for Rainbow and 20% Reduction for Internal and Passerby Trips. ;;;;:.;;:.:.;;;::;: ;::::; ......:.:::.:..:.: 15000vpd LOS F (5 .... . ......... All Redevelopments /13,800 vpd E.. ::........ O.... .:. Just Rainbow ......... .: 13,300 vpd :.;.» LOTS D - — All Redevelopments —.. — — -° — — — - 12,700 vpd LOS ......... All Redevelopments LOS �+ 12,300 vpd Just Rainbow - -. OS . -_ _'. S .. 10,300 vpd ......_. »:<;> >: »:: >:: >:«: . »:: »::; >......... Just Rainbow 2 -1-ane 3 -1-ane 4 -1-ane Undivided Type of Roadway Average Weekday Traffic Demand { on Eden Avenue Between Sherwood yv`> Road n a d Arcadia Avenue ........ ...... 6,500 vpd Existing Legend: Assumes No Internal or Passerby Trips and ITE Rates for Rainbow Foods. Assumes 20% Reduction for Internal and Passerby Trips. — — With Barton - Aschman Trip Rates for Rainbow and 20% Reduction for Internal and Passerby Trips. e 2 2 Super America a 0 . Amoco Edina R Pet OClinic Classic Hair Design A w N O m Supermarket � OP: - L�i oc: oz. at Food ?' , staursrit w; Rainbow Foods e 0 v � J� A A' .41 4' S Uhl dsr. 12' 12' 12' Shdr. 7— Cross-Section A -A' Eden Avenue C"°F Recommended ED1NA . ;:. Roadway Improvements AAay 1993 M No Scale The existing 36 -foot section on Eden Avenue is too narrow to adequately accommodate the forecasted traffic demands on a three -lane roadway. The 12 -foot through lanes would not provide enough width for a vehicle to pass a disabled vehicle without encroaching into the center lane. This would result in an undesirable situation. Therefore, it is suggested that the roadway be widened to a 44 -foot urban cross - section (3 -12 foot lanes and 4 -foot shoulders) with a painted TWLTL between Sherwood Road and the TH 100 southbound on -ramp. The shoulders could be dropped underneath the existing railroad bridge to the available 36 foot width and an exclusive right turning a could -6e added into the proposed Rainbow Foods main access (Figure 16). .EMI 48 SECONDARY ACCESS FOR AREA SOUTH OF EDEN AVENUE Access to and-from the area south of Eden Avenue is currently provided via. Sherwood Road. There is no other access to and from this area for patrons or employees of the Edina Pet Clinic, Classic Hair Design Salon, TSC Office Building or Eden Circle Office Warehouse or for residents of the 45 single family homes in this area. As indicated in the queuing analysis, the left - turning movement from . Sherwood Road to westbound Link Road may be blocked during a large portion of the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period. by vehicles stacked back from the left - turning lane on the east approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection. This condition may also block the left- turning movement into the area, which could result in the entire area south of Eden Avenue (excluding the Rainbow Foods development) being restricted to one right in/right out access during certain hours of the day. However, the proposed Rainbow Foods development may also offer an opportunity to provide a second access roadway to and from the area south of Eden Avenue. This roadway could be provided if an agreement could be reached between Rainbow Foods and the City of Edina that would modify the proposed eastern access driveway to /from Rainbow Foods to connect with existing Eden Circle and operate as a public roadway (Figure 17). The advantages and disadvantages of providing this roadway connection are listed below. Advantages 1. Provides another access into and out of this area, such that, if the Sherwood Road access is blocked during the post- Rainbow develop- ment PM peak hour time period, patrons will still be able to access this area. 2. The roadway connection would provide another emergency access route to /from this area, which is desirable for public safety reasons. #IMI 49 i ` PGQ�is ®f POSSIBLE PUSUC f ROADWAY r RAINBOW CONNECT 0t+I FOODS son 'SITE I � 1 �t It L y Conceptual Illustration CrNOF of Secondary E D I NA < Roadway Connection GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE (# 2). 3. The secondary access would provide Rainbow Foods with additional public roadway frontage, which would increase visibility and accessibility. Disadvantages 1. May require Rainbow Foods to dedicate necessary right -of -way for the roadway, which would decrease the amount of developable land area for parking and truck maneuvering. 11128!1 51 CONCLUSIONS The proposed Rainbow Foods/fast -food development south of Eden Avenue is - expected -to generate approximately 8,270 daily vehicle trips, including 297 inbound and 285 outbound trips during the PM / peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no (/ internal or passerby trips and TTE "supermarket" trips rates, which are likely high for this type of grocery store. • The proposed redevelopment of the four sites within the Grandview area (.the Rainbow Foods development, the Regis redevelopment, the assumed Jerry's Foods expansion and the Murphy automotive devel- opment) is expected to generate approximately 15,860 daily vehicle trips, including 573 inbound and 645 outbound vehicle trips during ✓ the PM peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no internal or passerby trips and no reduction for trips generated by the existing land uses on these sites. • A comparison of the three possible development scenarios for the area south of Eden Avenue (Rainbow Foods development, medium density residential development or office /office- showroom development) indicate that the proposed Rainbow Foods development would be expected to generate significantly more traffic than the other two development alternatives. The previous Grandview Area Traffic Studies, prepared by BRW, Inc., in 1984 and 1990, assumed a directional distribution for trips to /from the Grandview area of 25 percent via Vernon Avenue to the southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen Boulevard, 50 percent via TH 100 and 10 percent via Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east. This distribution was based on the Metropolitan Council's regional travel model for the Twin Cities Metropolitan area and on regional land use types (office, industrial, residential) for the Grandview area. Since the area is now proposed for a much larger percentage of retail redevelopment, which should draw from a smaller subregional or local area, the previous traffic studies distribution was not used to distribute traffic for this report. Simi 52 • The expected directional distribution of site - generated traffic to and from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other proposed/ expected retail development was based on a vehicle trace study conducted by BRW, Inc. The trace study was conducted by following vehicles from the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store to determine their travel routes to /from the area. The trace study distribution estimates that the major approach roadways to the redevelopment sites will be Vernon Avenue to /from the southwest (47 percent), Interlachen Boulevard -(15 percent), TH 100 (16 percent) and Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east (13 percent). A market study conducted by the developers of the Rainbow Foods site estimated the directional distribution as; 20 percent to /from Vernon. Avenue' to the southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen Boulevard, 28 percent via TH 100 and 37 percent via Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east. This .market study distribution was also analyzed in this report. • Capacity analyses indicate that the existing key intersections within the Grandview area currently operate at acceptable levels of traffic operations (LOS D or better) during the PM peak hour, with the exception of the left- turning movements from the two Jerry's access drives onto southbou mon Avenue, which operate at LOS E and LOS F. However, field observations of these, intersections indicate that the existing traffic signals at Interlachen Boulevard and Link Road create enough gaps in the Vernon Avenue traffic stream to allow these movements to occur with only moderate delays, and, accident analysis indicate that there have not been accident problems at these locations. In addition, the capacity analyses of the existing conditions also indicate that the southbound to eastbound left - turning movement at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently operates at capacity. • Capacity analyses of the. post - redevelopment PM peak hour traffic conditions, with either the trace study or, market study distributions, indicate that each of the key intersection locations should continue to operate- at an acceptable level, with the exception- of the three movements noted above as being deficient in the existing conditions. These movements are likely to continue to operate at unacceptable levels and to decline in the post - redevelopment conditions. • A capacity analysis was also conducted for the expected post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) Sunday morning traffic conditions to determine if patrons of the Our Lady of Grace Church would be expected to encounter difficulties in exiting onto Eden Dim1 53 v J J Avenue during the Sunday morning grocery shopping period. The analysis indicated that the exiting movements from the church access onto Eden Avenue should operate at an acceptable level (LOS C) during the Sunday morning period. • Traffic signal warrant analyses for the Vernon Avenue intersections with the two Jerry's Foods access drives indicates that neither intersection currently meets the Warrant 11 requirements for the installation of a traffic signal and that neither intersection is expected to meet the requirements following the Rainbow Foods development. However, the -South access intersection is expected -to exceed -the - Warrant 11 requirements. following the redevelopment of the area between Eden Avenue and the existing Jerry's Foods. • Queuing analyses indicate that the 200 feet of available storage distance on the east approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection is expected to be exceeded during the post - Rainbow Foods development conditions with either the trace study or market study distributions. The expected traffic queues from the east approach left turn lane may block left - turning traffic to and from Sherwood Road, which would provide the area south -of Eden Avenue with only right in/right out access during the PM peak period. Traffic movements in and out of the existing Super- America access drive on Link Road may also be blocked by queued vehicles on the east approach -of -the Vernon- Avenue /Link Road intersection. Queuing analyses also indicate that the right turning movements on the east and south approaches and the left- turning movement on the north approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection may be deficient in the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period. • The recent accident history (1989 to 1991) of Vernon Avenue between Arcadia Avenue and Link Road indicate that there ace no intersections along this segment that exhibited accident rates higher than the typical average rates of 1.5 accJMEV for signalized intersections and 0.5 accJMEV for unsignalized intersections. However, there were an unusually high percentage of left turn accidents at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection. Most of these left - turning accidents occurred because westbound to southbound left - turning vehicles did not yield the right -of -way to oncoming eastbound through vehicles. Field observations of the intersection indicate that this left- turning movement is shared (i.e., left and through lane) and that the sight distance is marginal as the west approach of the intersection is on a horizontal curve. 81n3l 54 • The forecasted post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) traffic demand on Eden Avenue is expected to exceed the capacity of a two - lane roadway. However, a three -lane roadway with a TWLTL should adequately accommodate the expected traffic demand. • The construction of a second access roadway to and from the Sherwood neighborhood south of Eden Avenue would be desirable for public safety reasons (emergencies) and because the existing access roadway (Sherwood Road) may be blocked during a large portion of the PM peak hour. The construction of this roadway will require cooperation from Rainbow Foods as it will likely impact their development plans. This traffic study has concluded that the future traffic operations within the Grandview Area of the City of Edina will be acceptable, with or without the proposed and expected redevelopment within the area (including the Rainbow Foods development), if the recommendations within this report are implemented. EIK:1r 55 RECOMMENDATIONS • Widen Eden Avenue from Sherwood Road to the TH 100 South- bound. -on- ramp -to a -44 -foot- urban - section- (three 12- foot - lanes and - 4 -foot shoulders) with a center two -way, left -turn lane. • Provide a secondary access to the Sherwood neighborhood via a new road that would be located between the existing Soo Line Railroad right -of -way and the proposed Rainbow Foods store. The right -of- way for this access roadway would need to be negotiated with Rainbow- Foods. • Provide an exclusive right turning lane into the proposed Rainbow Foods site off of Eden Avenue. • Monitor the traffic demands at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection following the Rainbow Foods development and adjust the traffic signal timing if necessary. • Install signage near the existing Super - America access drives onto Link Road instructing motorists queued on Link Road not to physically block left -turn access in/out of Super - America. • Monitor the accident conditions at the Vernon Avenue&terlachen Boulevard intersection, particularly the westbound to southbound left - turning movement, and construct an exclusive left turn lane with protective signal phasing, if necessary. #IMI 56 APPENDIX Simi 57 Trip Generation Rates for Different Types of G rocery Stores BY RONALD J. HENSEN [)unng a recent traffic impact study for a commercial development, traffic counts of two types of existing grocery stores were needed when local neighborhood groups objected to the use of the rates published in ITE's Trip Generation because of the average na- ture of the rates. The groups were con- cerned that a proposed "warehouse" su- permarket would generate traffic volumes and neighborhood impacts greater than projected by the ITE rates. They preferred that, instead of the re- gional warehouse supermarket, a gro- cery "superstore," similar to an existing facility across town, be built. The ITE Trip Generation report de- fines a supermarket as a "retail store selling a complete assortment of food, food preparation and wrapping mate- rials, and household cleaning and serv- icing items. The supermarkets surveyed are usually open for business between 9 -00 q _ and 9r00 n_m " Fnr the nur- • Greater than 60,000 square feet in size. • Customers bag their own groceries. • Open 24 hours a day. • Advertises discounted prices! Traffic counts were performed at a recently opened warehouse store and a successful superstore. To satisfy the concerns of the neigh- borhood and the city planning commis- sion, traffic counts were performed at a recently opened warehouse store and a successful superstore that were similar to the proposed warehouse and super- store (stores had same names an&sites had comparable residential densities and traffic volumes). An actual count of trips (i.e., vehicles) attracted to a grocery store in a devel- opment with other commercial activities can be difficult to isolate. However, trips can be estimated by tabulating exiting groups of store patrons and employees and by observing patterns of transit and walking trips. Using this procedure, the number of exiting vehicles was esti- mated. As can be 'seen from Figure 1, the superstore, even with its smaller size (47,000 sq. ft. vs. 72,000 sq. ft.), gener- ated 50% more traffic than the ware- house store. Recognizing that the two stores could have disproportionate sales, and as a supplement to the count data, sales in- formation was obtained for both stores for the same time period. A breakdown of this sales data ('fable 1) shows that Table 1. Weekly Sales Data Superstore Warehouse Square footage 47,000 72,000 Average weekly customer count 31,000 21,000 Average purchase per customer $16.00 $38.00 Average weekly sales (approx) $500,000 $800,000 ADT (approxy 1,000 sq. ft. 220 80 Parking stalls provided/1,000 sq. ft. (approx) 5 8 Observed parking stall use (max) 5 5 Table 2. Approximate Trip Rates, per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Average Vehicle Trip Ends P.IM. Peak Hour of Adjacent Street System Land Use Weekday In Out Supermarket (ITE rate,) 125.5 4.50 4.32 Superstore° (study site) 220.0 12A 11.0 Warehouseb (study site) 80.0 3.4 3.5 ° Source: cited reference 1, pages 1236 -1237. ° Design day of Thursday. 22 - ITE JOURNAL - OCTOBER 1988 the warehouse patrons spend almost two- and -a -half times as much money per shopping trip than do their superstore shopping counterparts. This generally results in a longer shopping time and less parking turnover. (Warehouse store pol- icies typically require additional parking stalls.) Table 1 also exhibits the weekly sales transactions (customer counts) for both stores. Utilizing weekly sales data, an estimate of the average weekday vehicle trip ends (AWT) generated from each site for each day of the week was deter- mined. Figure 2 shows a daily compari- son between the two stores based on the number of customers per 1,000 square feet. Table 2 summarizes the .rM trip rate for supermarkets and the approxi- mate trip rates for each study site. The results of this study appear to sug- gest that trip generation rates for super- store and warehouse grocery stores may differ significantly from • those reported for the supermarket land use in Trip Generation. However, local studies of a supermarket may -also find rates signifi- cantly different from the rate reported in Trip Generation. This is not unusual, as = the rate reported in Thp Generation is an average rate, based on a wide range of values. Reference 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: ITE, 1987 1 Ronald J. Hensen is the principal of TransPlan Associ- ates, Inc., in Boul- der, Colorado. He holds B.S., M.S., and Ph. D. degrees in engineering and is a Fellow of ITE. Hensen's experience includes 15 years of teaching and traffic engineering research at both Purdue University and the Uni- versity of Denver and 5 years as traffic engineer for the City of Lakewood, Col- orado. Since 1979, he has been a full -time traffic engineering consultant. 160 140 120 c 100 E 6- 80 o a 60 U 40 =F] 20 0 SUN. MON. TUES. WED. THUR. FRI. SAT. Day of Week Warehouse O Superstore Figure 2. Grocery store comparison: Customers vs. day of the week. Public Works Access OR 390(190) OR 000 S °o Our Lady of Grace Church Access Legend: 00 Total Traffic (00) Rainbow foods Site Generated Component e _ Post Redevelopment ;I E D I NA Sunday Morning (10:00 - 11:00 a.m.) Traffic Forecasts 0(0) 340(160) 0(0) ACM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transoortation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) LINK ROAD Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX1.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29_93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / ======================================================================= GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R |---- ---- ----|---- -_-- ---- i ---- ---- ----}---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 1 i 1 2 < | 1 1 < > 1 < Volumes 2 697 162| 88 548 101 185 5 771 17 9 11 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 |12.0 12.0 | 12.0 RTOR Vols � ���������������������-------------------------------------------------- 100l O| 01 0 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds WB Left 1SB Left * Thru * * | Thru * Right * * i Right * Peds | Peds NB Right 1EB Right SB Right JWB Right Green 5A 10A 40A !Green 23A Yellow/A-R 0 4 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 _______________________________________________________________________ secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C' Approachx Mvmts Cap _____ ____ Flow Ratio _______ _____ Ratio Delay LOS _____ _____ Delay LOS EB L 38 1693 0.05 ___ 0.02 32.7 D _____ ___ 11.2 B T 1624 3564 0.50 0.46 11.3 B R 690 1515 0.10 0.46 9.0 B WD L 301 1693 0.33 0.18 24.8 C 7'9 B TR 2172 3555 - 0.30 0.61 5.4 B NB L 429 1607 0.48 0.27 21.8 C 20.2 C TR 409 1532 0'23 0.27 16.7 C SB LTR 373 1398 0.11 0.27 16.1 C 16.1 C Intersection Delay = 11.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, _______________________________________________________________________ L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.460 HCM: SIGNALWED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center ======================================================================= For Microcomputers In Transportation* � Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE . (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD. Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX4.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW ===================================================== UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC | Eastbound | ================= Westbound | Northbound | Southbound L lr - |R L L .T -R-- | |-- ]� - -F�---! -L T -R ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____|____ ____ ____ No. Lanes 1 1 2 < 1 > 2 < | > 1 < | 1 1 < Volumes ! 239 339 71 64 479 4191 21 161 9| 302 81 60 �-.-Lone-Width 112.0-12,0 ( 12.0 | 12.0 |IZLO 12.() � � RTOR Vols 1 _______________________________________________________________________ 011 011 011 0 Signal Operations - Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 ED Left * * !NB Left * Thru * * | Thru * Right * * { Right * Peds ( Peds WE Left * QB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds Peds NB' Right |EB Right SB Right QB Right Green 17A 38A }Green 27A Yellow/A-R 0 ' 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 |Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs ________________________________________-________-_____________________ Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap _____ ____ _______ Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ED L 263 1693 _____ _____ ___ _____ 0.75 0.62 16.9 C 9.5 B TR 2211 3553 0.18 0.62 4.7 A WE LTR 1382 3190 0.81 0.43 16.7 C 16.7 C ` NB LTR 495 1592 0.43 0.31 16.2 C 16.2 C ' SB L 350 1125 0.96 0.31 50.8 E 39.5 D � TR 519 1668 0.30 0.31 15.3 C Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = ___-_________________-________________________-_________-____________-_ 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.822 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 o` Cehter For Microcomputers In Transportation ' ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) TH 100 SB RAMPS Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX5.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC ' ======================================================================= | Eastbouhd | Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R �---- ---- ---- | ---_ ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- No. Lanes i 2 1 | > 2 | | 1 > 1 Volumes 480 1721 190 610 i | 595 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.01 12.0 | 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 100| 0| | 0 _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations ' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left 1 N Left Thru * i Thru Right * | Right Peds i Peds WB Left * 1SB Left * Thru * i Thru * Right | Right Peds Peds NB Right }EB Right SB Right |uB Right Green 46A !Green 36A Yellow/A-R 4 ' !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 _______________________________________________________________________ intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ EB T 1861 3564 0.30 0.52 7.9 B 7.8 B R 791 1515 0.10 0.52 7.0 B WR LT 1407 2695 0.66 0.52 10.9 B 10.9 B SB L 696 1693 0.47 0.41 15.1 C 14.0 B . LT 698 1698 0.48 0.41 12.9 B Intersection Delay = 10.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.580 _______________________________________________________________________ ' -- ; `. HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= ` Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) GRANGE ROAD Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX6.HC9 / Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound � | L - T _R _| L __T R | L T- R- | L T -R - �---- ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No' Lanes | 2 < i > 2 | 1 1 | Volumes | 775 100| 6 780 ( 278 314| � Lane -Width-!-- - 12�0���� l����__12._0 |12_.0_ _12�0| — x RTOR Vols | 0| 0i 100| _______________________________________________________________________ Sig/al Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 r 5 6 7 8 .ED Left �NB Left * Thru * | Thru Right * | Right * Peds } Peds WD Left * |SB Left Thru Thru Right ( Right P e d Peds NB Right !EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 52A :Green 30A Yellow/A-R 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time no Kost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #i 05 _______________________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary ^ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ EB TR 2063 3503 0.49 0.59 7.1 B 7.1 B WB LT 2023 3435 0.45 0.59 6.8 B `6.B B NB L 583 1693 0.53 0.34 18.7 C 17.2 C R 522 1515 0.46 0.34 15.2 C — Intersection Delay = 9.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.508 - _______________________________________________________________________ HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation � Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) LINK ROAD � Analyst: JGH File Name: QWLYRTD1.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM Pk,' � Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 only Rainbow dev. w trace dist. � | Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound | Southbound 1L T R |L T R 1L T R |L T R ' � ____ ____ ____ | ____ ____ ____ | -___ ____ -___ |____ ____ ____ No. Lanes | 1 2 1 | 1 2 < | 1 1 < | > 1 < � Volumes | 2 697 2771 135 548 101 302 5 1141 17 9 11 � Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0:12.0 12.0 :12.0 12.0 | 12.0 ` RTOR Vols | _________________________________________________________ 100| 0| 0| 0 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 ` EB Left * !NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * ' Peds ' i Peds WB Left � * * |SB Left * Thru Thru * Right * * | Right * Peds | Peds NB Right |EB Right BB Right 1WB Right Green 5A 10A 40A !Green 23A Yellow/A-R 0 4 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 _______________________________________________________________________ secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap _____ ____ Flow Ratio ------- ----- Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 38 1693 0.05 _____ _____ ___ 0.02 32.7 D _____ 11.1 ___ B T 1624 3564 0.50 0.46 11.3 B R 690 1515 0.29 0.46 10.0 B WB L 301 1693 0.50 0.18 26.5 D 9.3 B TR 2172 3555 0.30 0.61 5.4 B NB L 428 1606 0.78 0.27 29.6 D 26.1 D TR 487 1527 0.0 0.27 17.3 C SB LTR 349 1308 0.12 0.27 16.1 C 16.1 C ` Intersection Delay = 13.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, _______________________________________________________________________ L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.584 p� HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE ' (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD. Analyst: JGH ' File Name: ONLYRTD4.HC9 Area Type: Other ' 4-29-93 PM PK _ Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 only Rainbow with trace dist. | Eastbound 1 Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound 1L T R 1L T R |L T R | L T R (---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- } ---- ---- ---- ---_ ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 2 < > 2 < | > 1 < } 1 1 < Volumes 1 276 349 7| 64 489 4191 21 161 91 302 81 97 Larrn-Width !12.0-12.0- K 12.0� �� � � -12. 3 � 1112.0 12 ' #"l-OR Vols | 0| 0i 0i 0 _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations ° Phase Combination 1 2 3 4! 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * :NB Left * Thru * * | Thru * Right Right * Peds | Peds WB Left * 1SB Left * Thru * i Thru * Right Right * Peds | Peds NB Right |EB Right SB Right QB Right Green 17A 38A !Green 27A Yellow/A-R 0 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 ' Lost Time 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase com bination order: #1 #2 #5 ----------------------------- I ----------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance S6mmary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ ___ EB L 263 1693 0.91 0.62 34.0 D 17.1 C TR 2211 3553 0'19 0.62 4~7 A WB LTR 1380 3185 0.82 0.43 17.0 C 17.0 C '- NB LTR 484 1556 0.44 0.31 16.3 C 16.3 C SE L 349 1123 0.96 0.31 51.2 E 38.1 D TR 509 1636 0.39 0.31 15.9 C Intersection Delay = 21.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.853 _______________________________________________________________________ HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= ^ Streets: (E�W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) LINK ROAD `v Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD1.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW & TRACE DIST. | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound � |L T R |L T R |L T R / L T R ---- ____ ____ _-__ ____ ____|____ No' Lanes | 1 2 1 | 1 2 < 1 < j > 1 < � Volumes | 2 749 3011 131 616 101 343 4 1001 17 9 11 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 112.0.12.0 | 12.0 RTOR Vols __ ------ ________________________ 100| ___________________________________________ 011 0| � 0 , ^ ` Signal Operations � Phase Combination 1 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 � EB Left * |NB Left * � Thru * | Thru * Right * i Right * ` Peds i Peds WB Left * * |SB Left * Thru * * i Thru * Right * * j Right * Peds | Peds NB Right |EB Right SB Riqht XB Right Green 5A 10A 40A :Green 23A Yellow/A-R 0 4 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 � Lost Time 3.0 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj ,Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap - _____ ____ Flow Ratio _______ _____ Ratio Delay LOS ----- Delay LOS ' EB L 38 1693 0.05 _____ ___ 0.02 32.7 D ----- -__ 11'4 B T 1624 3564 0.54 0.46 11.7 B R 690 1515 0.32 0.46 10.2 B WB L 301 1693 0.49 0.18 26.3 D 9.0 B TR 2173 3556 0.34 0.61 5.6 B � NB L 428 1606 0.89 0.27 38.2 D 33.3 D TR 406 1524 0.28 0.27 17.0 C SB LTR 360 1349 0.11 0.27 16.1 C 16.1 C Intersection Delay = 15.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, _______________________________________________________________________ L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.632 - HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= , Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD. � Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD4.HC9 Area Type: Other, 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW & TRACE DIST. ======================================================================= � Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T _R 1L T R �____ --__ ____|____ ____ -__- ---- ____ ____(____ ____ ____ �No. Lanes 1 1 2 < ( > 2 < | > 1 < 1 1 < 16i Volumes 1 297 357 271 71 500 4191 36 16 91 304 89 110 � -Lane'-Width |1Z.() 12.0 -| J2.0---- >— - -12.0�� 112-�()-12.0 — , RTOR Vols 0: 0| 0 ______________________-________________________________________________ _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * :NB Left * Thru * * | Thru * Right * * j Right * Peds | Peds WB Left * iSB Left * Thru Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds NB Right 1EB Right SD Right :WB Right Green 17A 38A !Green 27A Yellow/A-R 0 4 }Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 ----------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ ___ EB L 263 1693 0.99 0.62 54.0 E 25.7 D TR 2194 3526 0,20 0.62 4.8 A WB LTR 1363 3145 0.85 0.43 17.9 C 17.9 C NB LTR 451 1449 0.52 0.31 17.2 C 17.2 C SB L 341 1097 0.99 0.31 58.4 E 41.8 E TR 508 1634 0.43 0.31 16.3 C Intersection Delay = 25.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C ` Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.890 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ' ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) TH 100 SB RAMPS Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD5.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment, EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW& TRACE DIST. ======================================================================= � Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T, R 1L T R 1L T R |L T R �---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----:---- _--- ---- No. Lanes i 2 1 | > 2 1 > 1 Volumes | 498 1771 190 627 | 1 595 17 Lane Width | 12.0 12.0| 11.0 | !12.0 12.O RTOR Vols | 100| 0| | O ____________________________________________________-__________________ ` Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left 1NB Left Thru * | Thru ' Right * | Right Peds | Peds WB Left * QB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right | Right Peds | Peds NO Right |EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 46A !Green 36A Yellow/A-R 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 _______________________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ EB T 1.861 3564 0.31 0.52 8.0 B 7.8 B R 791 1515 0.11 0.52 7.0 B WB LT 1391 2664 0.69 0.52 11.2 B 11.2 B SB L 696 1693 0.47 0.41 15.1 C 14.1 B LT 700 1702 0.50 0.41 13.1 B Intersection Delay = 11.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.604 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ^ ' SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) GRANGE ROAD ' Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD6.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK ' Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW & TRACE DIST. | Eastbound | Westbound 1 Northbound | Southbound �L T R |L T R '|L T R |L T R �---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- -_-- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- No. Lanes j 2 < > 2 Volumes ( 794 1011 6 795 | 280 314} � Lane-Width 1I!,0 � � 12.0- |12~0 12.0|- � RTOR Vols | 0� -------------------------------------------------- 0| 100| Signal _--------------------------- Operations ' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left |NB Left * Thru Thru Right * | Right * Peds i Peds WB Left * |SB Left Thru * | Thru Right Right Peds | Peds NB Right !EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 52A |Green 30A ' Yellow/A-R 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time no !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase �������������������������������������������������������������---------- combination order: #1 #5 Intersection Performance Summary ` Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ---- ------- - Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- EB TR 2063 3504 ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.51 0.59 7.1 B 7.1 B WB LT 2015 3421 0.46 0.59 6-9 B 6.9 B NB L 583 1693 0.53 0.34 18.8 C 17.2 C R 522 1515 0.46 0.34 15.2 C Intersection Delay = 9.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.516 _______________________________________________________________________ `HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) LINK ROAD Analyst: JGH File Name: WORST1.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK Comment: WITH ITE TRIP RATES FOR RAINBOW AND TRACE STUDY DISTRIBUTION � Eastbound 1 Westbound | Northbound | Southbound � L T R 1 L T R | L T` R | L T R �____ ____ _-__ ---- ____ ____1____ _-__ ____ ____ ____ ____ No. Lanes | 1 2 1 | 1 2 < | 1 1 < | > 1 < Volumes i 2 754 3731 164 629 10| 405 5 1331 17 9 11 Lane Width :12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 | 12.0 RTOR Vols | _____ ---- ___________________- 100| 0| 0: 0 7_______-_____-____________________________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left � * !NB Left * Thru * ( Thru * Right * | Right * Peds i Peds WB Left }SB Left * Thru * * | Thru * Right * * | Right * Peds Peds NB Right |EB Right SB Right !WB Right Green 5A 10A 35A :Green 28A ' Yellow/A-R O 4 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 3.0 :Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 _______________________________-______________________________________-- secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap _____ ____ Flow Ratio _______ _____ Ratio Delay LOS _____ Delay LOS EB L 38 1693 0.05 _____ ___ 0.02 32.7 D _____ ___ 14.2 B T 1426 3564 0.62 0.40 14.4 B R 606 1515 0.50 0.40 13.6 B WD L 301 1693 0.60 0.18 28.4 D 11.4 B TR 1976 3556 0.38 0.56 7.3 B NB L 505 1567 0.89 0.32 34.6 D 29.6 D TR 491 1525 0.31 0.32 15.0 B SB LTR 412 1278 0.10 0.32 13.8 B 13.8 B Intersection belay = 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L _____________________________-________________________________________- = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.713 JUN 10 '93 08:24 ERW INCo Telecopy Date: V N C—I 1 o 8 R w INC. Please deliver the following page(s) to: Recipient: M!¢2cc =(,�f� b4jC Ii " Company or Agency: `i Tr cr)= U191 0.14 Address: Fax #: 5'Z7— This telecopy is being sent by: P.1 PIMOMg Name: 7kansportation Wneering Studio or Department: Urban Design If you do not receive y pages, including cover sheet, please contact: 'Iluesha square . 70DThWStreetSo. �f. at bl2 /370 -0700, Ext. y�Z Mirweapous, MN SMIS 612/370-0700 Remarks: Fax 612/37a1378 Mirkmapolis Phomix Denver St. Prtersburg San Diego Soattio MW 0S.Mai-Oh r I JUN 10 '99 09:24 BRW INCo . ..... ............................................................._....................................................... .,............................. 20,000 LOS F ... 18,000 14,000 m a 12,000 cv 10,000 O 8,000 T k. RCK 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2 -Lane 3 -Lane Undivided 4 -1-a Type of Roadway Average Weekday Traffic Demand 91-C-61 A �. ason Eden Avenue Between Sherwood lN 1F$ Road and Arcadia Avenue GRAN i) *%/IEW AR F; A TRAFFIC STUDY P.2 000 vpd Redevelopments adud:7 �S sz+4 of �n i�Yegve )a "pd ajavel op'"ents 10FK'ce- VWjrw" of &C,% AV,-. ,= '00 vpd' )sting Legend: Assumes NQ Bstemal or Passerby Trips and RE Rates for Rainbow Foods. ft JUN 10 '93 09:25 DRW INCo CONCLUSIONS • Three alternative land uses scenarios are being considered for the redevelopment of the area south of Eden Avenue. The expected trip generation from each scenario is as follows: - Rainbow /Fast Food - 11,300 VPD - Medium Density Residential -1,180 VPD - Office /Office Showroom -1,280 VPD • Other redevelopment in the area would ultimately add another 4,560 VPD for a total of as much as 15,860 net new trips in the Grandview Area. • Existing traffic operations at all key public street intersections are considered acceptable. P.3 • A "worst case" analysis of post redevelopment conditions indicates that the level of congestion at all key public street intersections is - expected to increase but remain at acceptable levels. • The additional new trips generated by -a grocery/fast food development south of Eden Avenue will increase volumes and congestion. on Eden to the point where the roadway would need to be three lanes in order to provide an acceptable level of traffic operations. • A "worst case" analysis of the total redevelopment being considered in the Grandview Area indicates that Eden Avenue would have to be widened to four lanes in order to provide acceptable levels of traffic operations. • A "worst rase" analysis of the post redevelopment traffic volumes indicates that queuing along Link Road (from the traffic signal at Vernon Avenue) is likely to extend past Sherwood Road during peak traffic periods. n2M JUN 10 '93 08 26 DRW INC. EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02 CAPACITY ANALYSES SUMMARY P.4 t Southbound left turn at capacity. - aa Southbound and Eastbound left turns at capacity. Alt. 1 - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Market Study Distribution. Alt. 1A - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Trace Study Distribution. Alt. 2 = All Redevelopment With Market Study Distribut'ion.' Alt. 2A - All Redevelopment With Trace Study Distribution. PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE # INTERSECTION CONTROL EXISTING Alt.'1 Alt. 1A Alt. 2 Alta 1 VERNON AVE. / LINK RD. SIGNAL B B C C C. 2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - F F F F FOODS SOUTH ACCESS 3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S THRU /STOP - F F F F FOODS NORTH ACCESS 4 VERNON AVE. / SIGNAL C a C i C t C C 9 INTERLAC EN BLVD. 5 VERNON AVE. J TH 100 SIGNAL. B 8 B 8 8 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD. SIGNAL B B B B 3 7 EDEN ANE. / SNERW00D RD. THRU /STOP - C D C D 6- E DEIi . AM. / AF4rADI A AVE . - 4-,WAY STOP B C B C C 9 EWK AVE. / WILSON RD. 4 -WAY STOP B C S, C C 10 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - C D C D RAINBOW WEST'ACCESS 11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED THRU /STOP - C C C C RAINBOW EAST ACCESS t Southbound left turn at capacity. - aa Southbound and Eastbound left turns at capacity. Alt. 1 - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Market Study Distribution. Alt. 1A - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Trace Study Distribution. Alt. 2 = All Redevelopment With Market Study Distribut'ion.' Alt. 2A - All Redevelopment With Trace Study Distribution. q1� 1l?l a e `> �T O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # II. C. From: Kris P. Aaker Consent [ 7x Information Only ❑ Date: June 7, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: B-93 -5, Variance 0 To Council Appeal. 6312 Hills Road. Action Motion Indian ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Acknowledge withdrawal of appeal. Info /Background: As indicated in the attached letter, the property owners of 6312 Indian Hills Road have decided to withdraw their request for a five foot sideyard setback variance. The homeowners have indicated to staff that they wish to pursue a conforming solution. HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES 612 9410572 P.01 i %c` _ �_ fr !L�/K. YO /QiYt d ?xv 2 A. o e, �. • , RIO 6-' • ne• REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: June 7, 1993 Subject: Amendments to Sign Ordinance, Section 460 of City Code & Moratorium of Sign Permits. Recommendation: Agenda Item # I I I . A. & B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution [] Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt Ordinance Amendments and Repeal Moratorium on Sign Permits. Info /Background: As directed by the Council, staff has prepared amendments to two sections of the sign ordinance. 1. Freestanding Signs. The ordinance is revised to allow one sign per building in the PCD -2 District. Presently, the code allows one freestanding sign for each street frontage. 2. Awnings. The ordinance is revised to treat transparent or translucent awnings as signs, whether illuminated or not. If the Council adopts the amendments staff would recommend waiver of second reading. Staff would also recommend lifting the moratorium if the amendments are adopted. i ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO ADDRESS THE USE OF AWNINGS, CANOPIES AND MARQUEES AND TO CHANGE THE NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS PERNIITTED IN THE PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 13 of Subsection 460.03 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Subd. 13 Awnings, Canopies, or Marquees. A. Awnings, canopies or marquees shall be considered as part of the wall area and thus shall not warrant additional sign area. B. Awnings, canopies or marquees constructed of transparent or translucent material shall be deemed to be a sign panel for purposes of determining sign area." Section 2. Subd. 4 of Subsection 460.05 is hereby amended to provide that the maximum number of freestanding signs allowed in the PCD -2 District shall be one per building. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO LIFT THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF PERAUTS FOR SIGNS AND AWNINGS BY REPEALING SECTION 461 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 461 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $51000 , DATE: 7 June, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Articulated Sidewalk Plow Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Aspen Equipment 1. $ 49,483.00 2. McQueen Equipment 2. $ 59,734.00 3. Long Lake Tractor 3. $ 68,489.00 4. 4. 5. 5 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: McQueen Equipment $ 59,734.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for a sidewalk plow. The low bid did not meet specifications. See attached information. The purchase will be funded from the equipment replacement fund. Sign ure/"; The Recommended bid is within budget not within Kenneth Public Works - Streets Department,, City Wallin, Director r CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: May 12, 1993 TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer & Director of Public Works FROM: Steve Johnson, Purchasing SUBJECT: TRACKLESS BID Bids were opened on April 1, 1993 for one (1) articulated sidewalk plow. Bids received were: Long Lake Tractor $68,489 MacQueen Equipment $59,734 Aspen Equipment $49,483 The bid from Aspen Equipment does not meet specs in'several areas including horsepower - 105 vs 78. Attachments must be hydraulically driven, however, the sweeper attachment from Aspen is mechanically driven. The snow blower from Aspen Equipment is 50" with a machine width of 51 ". MacQueen's snow blower is 51" (meeting spec) with a machine width of 49 1/2" which would be the correct measurement for proper snow clearing on a 60" sidewalk. Therefore, I am recommending award of.the bid to MacQueen Equipment - the lowest bidder meeting specification. SJ /dj A.1� e N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15,000 DATE: May 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM v. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fqur -wheel Drive Utility Tractor with Cab/ Company Detachable Loader Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Scharber & Sons 1. $22,500 2. Carlson Tractor & Equipment 2. $33,426 3• Long Lake Tractor & Equipment 3. $38,633 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Scharber & Sons $22,500 GENERAL INFORMATION: TNeptPacemsentyhin the budget and is with a trade -in of a 1972 tractor. Bid was for used tractors, limited to one years old, previously leased tractors. With the purchase of a used tractor, there is a savings of $5,000 to $10,000 over a new tractor. sfiapeor. recommended for purchase has been looked over and is in L✓ The Recommended bid is within budget not Kenneth Rosland amn, rmance uirector Manager N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Fred Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: May 26, 1993 AGENDA ITEM y.c ITEM DESCRIPTION: Unleaded gasoline for Braemar Golf Course Maintenance Company Amount of Quote or Bid �. Rollins Oil Company not to exceed $13,000 (Hennepin Co. bid #2640A3 -232. Contract date, May 1, 1993 to April 31, 1996. Price.based on rack average price) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Rollins Oil Company ( Hennepin County Bid) not to exceed $13,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for year long purchase of unleaded gasoline to be delivered to Braemar Golf Course maintenance. The Recommended bid is 0 - .Y within budget not Kenneth 4,gl�jl, � REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Fred Richards and Council Mmembers FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: May 26, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fourth of July Fireworks at Cornelia Park Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc. 1. $7,300 2. (ONLY QUOTE RECEIVED) 2. 3. 3. 4. 4, 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc. $7,300 GENERAL INFORMATION: Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc..has been doing the fireworks display for the past 25 years and has been doing an excellant job. $1,300.00 to be funded from contingencies. Sign Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within Oudget Jq'bq Wallin, i it ance Director Kenneth Rosland City I k A. A. (e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 7 June, 1993 Subject: Curb Cut Request on Thielen Avenue from 5621 Wood Lane St. Louis Park Agenda Item # VI.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Review request for curb cut opening onto Thielen Avenue from 5621 Wood Lane which is in St. Louis Park. Info /Background: As part of a new ordinance, residents must apply for curb cuts onto City streets when replacing or adding new curb openings. A property owner at 5621 Wood Lane is applying to access Thielen Avenue for a garage installation on the backside of the Wood Lane property. The applicant has submitted a request and had appropriate surveying completed to determine if access is possible. Also, staff has discussed this issue with the applicant. Staff requested a letter from the applicant describing the understanding that the applicant would be agreeing to if a curb cut was granted. Certainly, there are residents on Thielen Avenue who would not like to see an additional curb cut be granted. As such, this matter is being referred to City Council for review. There is not a public hearing process for curb cuts and normally are not controversial. The City Attorney and Thielen neighbors may have additional comments. A location map, applicant's letter and surveyor's letter are attached. Mon; oil �'� /ICI �1 ' � � MB 01000=0 BBBB'somm, m M 10000 ST 52ND S' -:sF W. •9 TM It miLLTO• /y CiT X. HALL 6 PUBLIC POLICELIS ii DEPT MNA 0 1 10 PUB L I C a, WORKS 'D CENTER DI NA COUN- ry 10 t A MV (.+ 3 June 1993 St. Louis Park, MN 55436 Mr. Francis Hoffman, City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, M - 55424 Mr. Hoffman; As part of our recent application for a curb cut permit from the City of Edina, we submit this letter to confirm our understanding of the specific conditions suggested by staff. The conditions specified as of 21 September 1992, and reiterated by yourself during our conversation today, were as follows: (A) Property irons to be located to ascertain that property abuts public right-of-way. The property was surveyed (by Egan, Field & Novak, Inc.) and a copy of their findings has been submitted. No gap, platted or surveyed, exists. (B) The curb cut be on the east portion of the north end of Thielen. As discussed today, we will restrict the driveway access to a maximum width of 12 feet rather than 14 feet as was shown on the contractor's plans, aligned with the east edge of the Thielen Avenue asphalt. (C) Landscaping be maintained or improved to continue neighborhood aesthetics. Discussion with our contractor revealed that some of the existing vegetation can, and will be, saved. We will be constructing decorative and privacy fencing, and will replace as much vegetation as possible with plants we hope will be be more pleasing to us as well as Thielen Av. Also, as we discussed today, we do understand that because we will be availing ourselves of City of Edina services by using Thielen Av. for access, we would be subject to Thielen Av. assessments should the street suffer construction or street improvements in the future. A l , rie J. L d r FIELD December 11, 1992 Robin Pinck Stephanie Leckbank 5621 Wood Lane St. Louis Park, Mn 55416 Re: Property line survey and research Dear Ms Pinck and Ms Leckbank: & NOWAK, INC, FAX: (612) 5466839 As you requested we have surveyed your southerly property line and also researched our files for any gap possibilities with properties adjacent to your southerly property line. Your property is described as the east 50.00 feet of Lot 8, Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside. The south line of Lot 8 is adjacent to the north line of Thielen's Brookside. Our research indicates that Thielen's Brookside and the Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside are platted using a common line and no platted gap exists. Research of our previous surveys within these two plats does not reveal a gap existing between any monumentation found in the field. The survey we recently performed in September, 1992 also found no gap in existing monumentation between the two plats. We hope this explanation answers any questions regarding this matter. If we can assist you further please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jack Bolke, Vice President, COO �y I AGENDA ITEM VI.A %7J�t yo re a�I Gow�d.�.zE- -�o GL �rnom�ot.Q.e.�.wrzv j z MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THEILEN AVENUE INTRODUCTION Before the Edina City Council is an application from Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck for a permit to install a private driveway at the northern end of Theilen Avenue, a dead -end street in the city of Edina. Leckband and Pinck are the owners of 5621 Wood Lane in St. Louis Park. They have plans to build a new detached two car garage on the property and wish to run a driveway from the garage to Theilen Avenue, at the rear of their lot, instead of using their current driveway accessing wood Lane. The owners of the houses on Theilen Avenue oppose this proposed driveway because of the substantial negative impact the, proposed driveway would have on the character of Theilen Avenue, the aesthetics of the area, and on property values of homes located on the street. The garage will be set back only 15 feet from Theilen Avenue, less than half the distance of the average set back of all other structures on this street. Opening the end of the street for this proposed driveway will alter the essential character of Theilen Avenue, ruin the aesthetics of the street, and harm the property values of the houses along the street. The issue was raised before the St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals which gave preliminary approval to the plan, but expressly reserved for the' City of Edina consideration of how the proposed driveway would affect property on Theilen Avenue. Legally, Edina has the discretion to deny the requested curb cut if the proposal can be shown to have a negative impact on the surrounding property. It does and the residents of Theilen Avenue request that the council deny the requested permit. FACTS Theilen Avenue is one - block, dead -end street on the northern edge of Edina. There are approximately 20 homes on the street. Theilen Avenue ends at the St. Louis Park /Edina border. Immediately south of the end of Theilen Avenue dead is 5621 Wood Lane located in St. Louis Park. The house was bought by Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck in 1985. At the time they purchased the home and now, the house has had a 1 -1/2 car detached garage located in what is considered the home's backyard; i.e. on the south side of the property. The current driveway runs north from the garage along the west side of the house to Wood Lane. Two years ago, Leckband and Pinck decided to replace the garage with a new, two car garage. They were told, however, because the lot was adjacent to two streets, Wood Lane and Theilen, it had "two front yards" and any new garage on the property would require a variance because of the 35 foot front set back requirements of St. Louis Park. Leckband and Pinck proposed to build the garage with a 15 foot set back from Theilen Avenue. They '4 also proposed,to access the garage from Theilen Avenue, abandoning half of their old driveway and instead using as a side lot parking area. Leckband and Pinck obtained a variance to construct the proposed garage. (See attached) In granting the variance, however, the City of St. Louis Park clearly recognized the .possible negative impact of the proposed new driveway into Theilen Avenue. The City was presented with a petition signed by every resident of Theilen Avenue opposing the proposed garage access from Theilen Avenue for aesthetic and safety reasons. (Attached) Theilen Avenue residents were present at the public hearing held on the variance request, and their complaints about the proposal were heard. Although the St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals granted the variance, it deferring to the City of Edina the issue of whether access to the property would' be permitted from. Theilen Avenue. As stated in the formal Report and Recommendation of the City's Community Development Staff: Edina officials are awaiting the outcome of the variance request before making final decision. In either event, whether the garage access is from Wood Lane or Theilen Avenue is not directly related to the variance. Access to the proposed garage can be provided from either road. The City of St. Louis Park does not have any preference to either access. The Citv of Edina must review the proposal to determine if access from Theilen Avenue would negatively impact the street. If so determined the anplicants would still have access to Wood Lane and the aaraae could still be constructed as proposed. (Attached) (emphasis added). The variance itself makes no mention of access to the .garage. The St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals thus elected to defer to the City of Edina consideration of the negative impact on Theilen Avenue properties of the proposed access from Theilen Avenue to 5621 Wood Lane, thereby leaving Edina with the option of deciding whether to accept the application of Leckband and Pinck for a permit to build the proposed driveway. That is the issue now before the Council. JUIV 04 `Z43 09: 20 RBE H ri FT'i'S LHW ISSUES I. DOES THE CITY OF EDINA HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DENY THE, REQUESTED PERMIT FOR A CURB CUT AT THE NORTHERLY END OF THEILEN AVENUE? II. WOULD THE PROPOSED ACCESS FROM THEILEN AVENUE TO 5621 WOOD LANE ALTER THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE PROPERTY OR ITS SURROUNDINGS? DISCUSSION I. THE CITY OF EDINA HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT FOR A CURB CUT AT THE NORTHERLY END OP THEILEN AVENUE. P. 4/8 Concerns have been raised as to whether the City of'Edina has the authority to deny the requested permit for a curb cut onto Theilen Avenue. The answer to that question is unequivocally "yes" for two reasons. First, Leckband and Pinck do not have a right of access to Theilen Avenue because they are not owners of property "abutting" Theilen Avenue in the legal sense of the word "abut." Second, as a matter of comity, the City of St. Louis Park deferred to the City of Edina the issue of the effect of the proposed driveway on the neighboring property on Theilen Avenue, leaving Edina with the discretion to deny the curb cut. A. Leckband and Pinck, as St. Louis Park Residents, Do Not Own Property That Abuts Theilen Avenue in the Legal Sense Of the Term. Generally, owners of property that abuts a public right of way have a right of access to that right of way, subject to the police and regulatory powers of the local government. The term "abutting property" is a term of art in property law and means more than property that is merely adjacent to a public right of way. To be an "abutting" owner of property, one's ownership of the property must somehow support or sustain travel on the street in issue. See _Voss v. City Of Middleton, 470 N.W.2d 625, 631 (Wis. 1991). In a remarkably similar case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a landowner in the City of Madison.did not own property "abutting" a street in the City of Middleton, even though that property was physically adjacent to the Middleton street. The Court stated, "where a landowner is not somehow supporting or sustaining travel on the street, he is not an 'abutting, landowner" within the meaning of the relevant statute. Id. The Court continued: A landowner's supporting or sustaining of travel on a municipal street can be considered to involve financial considerations. For one thing, landowners in any given municipality 1 are financially responsible for maintenance of and improvements to the municipality's streets; a landowner within a given municipality whose land is deemed to "abut" a municipal street can be charged a special assessment by the municipality for local improvements to the street. Id. at 631 -32. Similarly, in Good Deal of Ivy Hill, Inc. v. City of Newar)�, 32 N.J. 263, 160 A.2d 630 (1960), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that "the test to be applied * * * in deciding if plaintiff is an abutting owner, is whether the property would be subject to an assessment for construction or improvement of the street." 32 N.J. at 269, 160 A.2d at 633. The precise issue has never been squarely addressed in any reported court case in this state. Courts from other jurisdictions, however, overwhelmingly hold that the owner of property at the end of a cul -de -sac is not an abutter. See, e.a., Friscoville Realty Co. v. Police Jury, 127 La. 318, 53 So. 578 (Sup. Ct. 1910) ; Kinashiahway Stpply Co. v. Banner Iron Works, 266 Mo. 138, 181 S.W. 30 (Sup. Ct. 1915); Goldrich v. Franklin Gardens Corp., 282 App. Div. 698, 122 N.Y.S.2d 56 (1953); Thomas v. Julek,. 68 Wyo. 198, 231 P.2d 974 (Sup. Ct. 1951). It is only in cases in which there was shown a past and regular use of the dead -end street as a means of access to property that courts have determined that such property abutted the street. see Messinger v. City of Cincinnati, 36 Ohio App. 337, 173 N.E. 260 (Ct. App. 1930). The clear weight of legal authority on the issue is that a property owner in one municipality will not be deemed an abutting property owner to a roadway located in and controlled by a neighboring municipality, even if the property at issue -is physically adjacent to the street. In the present case, Leckband and Pinck do not have a right to the requested permit for a curb cut on Theilen Avenue. Neither they nor their predecessors in interest have ever paid property taxes or special assessments for construction or repaving of the street, curbs, or sidewalks on Theilen. They have paid no support for snow removal or other maintenance on the street. Leckband and Pinck have no claim of right to access to Theilen Avenue because they have never used Theilen Avenue for motor vehicle access to their property and have never provided financial support for maintenance of the street. Given the objections of the residents of Theilen Avenue and the clear showing that the proposed driveway will alter the essential character of the surrounding property on Theilen Avenue, the Council should deny Leckband and Pinck's permit application. B. The City of St. Louis Park Has Invited The City of Edina Into The variance Application Process By Expressly Deferring To The City of Edina How The Proposed Driveway Would Affect Property Fronting Theilen Avenue, And Leaving Edina With the Option Of Denying The Curb Cut Application. As explained above, the City of St. Louis Park granted Leckband and Pinck's request for a variance, leaving open to Edina the option of denying the requested curb cut. The St. Louis Park City Staff expressly reserved that issue for determination by the appropriate authorities in the city of Edina. In essence, St. Louis Park has invited Edina into its determination as to the nature and extent of the variance. Clearly, Edina has the authority to decide whether to grant the curb cut request under the unique circumstances in this case. II. THE PROPOSED ACCESS FROM THEILEN AVENUE TO 5621 WOOD LANE WILL ALTER THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF TEE PROPERTY AND ITS SURROUNDINGS. St. Louis Park granted the requested variance, but reserved for Edina officials the discretion to deny the applicants the proposed curb cut. Minnesota law is clear that a variance from a zoning ordinance is to be granted only upon a showing that compliance with an ordinance would cause undue hardship to the property owner. See Krmtiotich v. City of Duluth, 474 N.W.2d 392 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). Three factors determine whether there is "undue hardship ": (1) "the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, (2) the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and (3) variance, if granted. will not alter the essential character of the locality." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 (1992); see also Edina City Ord. § 850.04, subd. 1(F). The City of St. Louis Park granted the variance requested by Leckband and Pinck, but expressly left for consideration by the City of Edina how access from the garage to Theilen Avenue would affect the third element of the "undue hardship" test - -the effect of the proposed driveway on the essential character of the locality. It is self - evident that the proposed driveway will negatively impact the essential character of the locality. Theilen Avenue is a quiet, dead -end street in northeastern Edina. All of the roughly 20 homes along the street are single family homes with an average setback of at least 30 -35 feet. Not a single lot is fronted by a garage. Some homes have single attached garages, others have rear yard garages. Looking north down the street, one sees the. back of 5621 Wood Lane and its current garage, which are screened by trees and by the break created by the end of the street. There is no connection between Theilen Avenue and 5621 Wood Lane; it is clear that the house located at 5621 Wood Lane is part of the neighborhood immediately to the north of Theilen. The addition of a driveway for 5621 Wood Lane onto Theilen will completely change the character of the street. 5621 Wood Lane would necessarily become part of the Theilen Avenue neighborhood, as are all other houses on the street with driveways to Theilen. The problem is that unlike all the other houses on Theilen, 5621 Wood Lane does not face Theilen, it faces north. The part of the lot closest to Theilen Avenue is unmistakably the home's backyard. If the proposed driveway were installed, every time someone drove north on Theilen, he or she would have to look directly in the backyard or garage of' 5621 Wood Lane. Due to its unique location, the most conspicuous house on the street would have its backyard and garage facing the street. The present arrangement at least provides foliage which screens•5621 from view; at.present the home is hardly noticeable. Granting the requested curb cut would change all of that. Clearly, if a landowner proposed to raze a house on the east side of Theilen and build a new home facing the creek instead of the street, with a detached garage 15 feet from the street, such a request would be summarily denied by the City. For the same reasons, the requested curb cut should be denied to 5621 Wood Lane. Zoning ordinances are enacted for aesthetic reasons as well as for the health and welfare of an area. VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 503, 509 (Minn. 1983). Edina should treat Leckband and Pinck's request as it would a request for a variance, especially since St. Louis Park officials expressly reserved for Edina the discretion to deny the requested curb cut if the proposed driveway would negatively impact Theilen Avenue properties. The proponent of a variance has a heavy burden of showing that approval is appropriate, since a variance allows property to be used in a manner forbidden by zoning ordinances. Castle Design v. City of Lake Elmo, 395 N.W.2d 578, 581 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986) ; Luger v. City of Burnsville, 295 N.W.2d 609, 612 (Minn. 1980). Leckband and Pinck have not met their burden here. They desire access to Theilen Avenue merely for their own convenience and enjoyment. There is no evidence of undue hardship if the request is denied. Significantly, denying Leckband and Pinck the curb cut does not in any way deprive them of the use of their property. They will continue to have access to Wood Lane, as they and all their predecessors in interest have always had. In contrast, granting the request would result in irreparable harm to the property owners on Theilen Avenue. The Edina. City Council should deny the request fora permit. 1-11 V_ JJ Vi' - __ 111 . . - . 1 -1.. i . V. '�J CONCLUSION The residents of Theilen Avenue do not object to the proposed construction of the two car garage at 5621 Wood Lane. They do not object to the variance allowing a 15 foot set back from Theilen Avenue. Their only objection is to the.proposed 15 foot driveway to the garage directly from the end of Theilen Avenue into the garage. If allowed, such an arrangement would clearly have a negative impact on the essential character of the street. The home would stick out like a sore thumb on the most conspicuous lot on the street. It would have a negative impact on property values along the street, particularly at the north end of Theilen, harming not only the economic interests of the residents of the street, but upon the city in the form of decreased property tax revenues. There clearly exists a rational, good faith basis to deny the requested permit for the proposed driveway. Moreover, the law is clear that the City has the authority, the right, and under the unique and compelling circumstances of this case, the obligation to deny the request for a curb cut permit given the great opposition to the proposed driveway. Therefore, the residents of Theilen Avenue respectfully request that the Edina City Council deny the application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck for a permit to install a driveway at the northerly and of Theilen Avenue. 49l'3j�f❑ o e T,` C: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council) Agenda Item # vi • B From: Francis Hoffman . i. Consent ❑ City Engineer ' / Information Only ❑ Date: 7 June, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Country Club District ❑ To Council Traffic Study Update Action ❑Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Review interim report. No action requested. Info /Background: City staff and consultant have been working with the neighbors and will make a presentation at the Council meeting Monday evrfeing. Attached is a status report which we well review at the meeting. SRFSTRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ PARKING SRF No. 0931752.1 MEMORANDUM TO: Fran Hoffman, P.E. City of Edina FROM: Dennis Eyler, P.E. DATE: June 4, 1993 SUBJECT: EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY STATUS REPORT AND OUTLINE OF PROJECT REPORT Actions Completed: The options for the reconstruction of Browndale Bridge were identified and explored by the consultant. 2. A public meeting with the neighborhood presented the bridge options and served as a forum for the residents to raise their concerns regarding traffic problems in the neighborhood. A product of that meeting was realization that there was very little support for widening the bridge to meet current standards for two -way traffic flow. The Browndale Road residents also became aware that any option that simply reduced the capacity of the bridge would create traffic impacts for other streets in the neighborhood. 3. As a result of that meeting a committee was established, with representation throughout the neighborhood, to identify the issues and to propose and evaluate solutions to the traffic problems by working with City staff and the consultant. The goal of the committee was to develop a list of possible actions that would be widely accepted throughout the neighborhood and acceptable to the Edina City Council. 4. An initial committee meeting produced a more detailed understanding of the traffic problems. The traffic problems include: large volumes of through traffic, speeding, poor stop sign compliance, poorly defined intersection controls at the triangular intersections and pedestrian safety issues. The committee members also stated what they thought were possible solutions to be investigated by staff and the consultant. Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 -4443 (612) 475 -0010 FAX (612) 475 -2429 Fran Hoffman, P.E. - 2 - June 4, 1993 5. The City continued to collect traffic volume and speed data and the consultant prepared a traffic flow computer model of the neighborhood in order to test the effects of any proposed solutions. 6. A second committee meeting was held where there were discussions concerning some of the possible solutions. Several alternative strategies were developed and others suggested that would require further refinement by the consultant. 7. Current activity the consultant is refining the alternatives and beginning to run the computer model to determine the effects of those alternatives. The alternatives consist of options at Browndale Bridge coupled with traffic control measures in and around the neighborhood along with measures to improve the operations of the surrounding arterial roadways in order to encourage through- traffic to remain on those routes where it belongs. Future Activities 8. Complete testing of alternatives. 9. Meet with the committee to review the results of the testing. Refine current alternatives or propose others for testing if results are not satisfactory. 10. Meet with the committee again if necessary. 11. Prepare final report with the proposed traffic control strategies and present those items to the Council for their consideration. The plan of implementation will reflect the difference between those measures that can be quickly implemented versus those requiring construction. COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT OUTLINE I. BACKGROUND OF STUDY AND TRAFFIC ISSUES Through Traffic in Neighborhood Speeding of Traffic Controls of Intersection and Pedestrian Crossings Operation of Browndale Bridge given Reconstruction Options II. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES A. Through Traffic 1. Total ins and outs 23,500 a. Local generated 8,000 b. Collector function of Wooddale 4,000 C. Frontage Road function of Browndale 2,000 d. Resultant "through" traffic 9,500 e. "Through" component on Browndale 1,325 2. Efforts to divert through- traffic a. Close north access points b. Ban Peak period left turns C. One -way links d. Increase number of stop signs e. Reconfigure triangle intersections, i.e., at Browndale and Country Club Road to require southbound traffic to curve left and stop f. Each of the above paired with each Browndale Bridge option 3. Efforts to attract through- traffic back to 50th Street/France Avenue a. Improved signal timing b. Right turn improvement southbound at 49-1/2 & France Avenue C. Intersecting geometrics /right turn at 50th Street and Halifax Avenue d. Consider raising the speed limits on preferred routes 1 4. Browndale Bridge Options a. One -way northbound b. One -way southbound C. Two -way (one direction at -a -time) operation with traffic signal d. Two -way (one direction at -a -time) operation with stop sign for southbound traffic e. Minor widening of the bridge to provide the minimum width required to provide typical two -way operation. f. Close the bridge to vehicular traffic (this option received little support) B. Speeding of Traffic 1. Speed Studies -- Ongoing but results to date show 85 percentile speed is 31 mph, speed limit is 30. 2. Can character of streets and neighborhood justify consideration of an area wide 25 mph zone -- legislation? Special dispensation from Mn /DOT. 3. Issue of "speeding" may go away, if through - traffic is reduced. 4. Controlling speeds through roadway features may still be required. Possible methods include converting triangular intersection to standard "T" intersections, choker islands in mid block to narrow the roadways. Speed humps and increased enforcement. C. Traffic Operations /Control Several intersections were identified where additional traffic control may be needed to improve pedestrian movements as well as create more orderly traffic flows. 1. The triangular intersections with the Wooddale Country Club Road area being of particular concern. 2. The Browndale - Edgebrook Place north intersection. 3. The Wooddale- Sunnyside area. r. III. DISCUSSION OF SOLUTIONS A. Negative Impacts of Solutions 1. Increased travel time and distance to neighborhood residents. 2. Diversion of traffic from one neighborhood street to another. 3. Enforcement requirements given current resources. 4. Emergency vehicle response times. 5. Negative precident set for the Council to consider in dealing with other neighborhoods in the future. 6. Costs. B. Improvements to Arterials to Attract "Through" Traffic Back to Those Roadways C. Alternatives being Considered 1. Closing the three northern connecting streets. a. Browndale between 44th and Sunnyside b. Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside C. Sunnyside between Arden and Grimes 2. Selected one -way roadways a. Browndale between 44th and Sunnyside -- one -way northbound b. Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside one -way northbound C. Browndale Bridge -- one -way southbound 3. Left turn restrictions a. Ban all left turns into the neighborhood during the peak hours b. Revise eastbound left turn signal at 50th and Wooddale to allow turns on arrow only K 4. Increase the number of stops for all possible route combinations through the neighborhood in order to increase travel times to be closer to those on the arterial roadways. D. Results of the testing of alternatives IV. RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN A. Items that can be quickly implemented B. Mid term improvements requiring construction but possible to complete this year C. Long range improvements V. CONCLUSIONS 4 as e� �r c REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman Director of Public [dories Date: 7 June, 1993 Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Dahlquist Addition Recommendation: Agenda Item # vI . c Consent CI Information Only [-j Mgr. Recommends F7 To HRA C To Council Action 7 !! Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance Reaffirm City policy that connection charges on sanitary sewer or water hook -ups continue to be the cost of the assessment plus interest on the assessment cost from date of assessment to date of sewer and water connection. Info /Background: With the approval of the Dahlquist Addition, four new lots were created to access the existing sanitary sewer crossing over the existing Dahlquist property. The new plat required a new road, new watermain, storm sewer and relocating a portion of the sanitary sewer. As such, the above construction costs are borne by the developer. Additionally, the City had not assessed the Dahlquist property for any sanitary sewer when constructed twenty years ago. The property was owned by Ruth Schaefer at the time. All others paid an assessment of $1,838.57 per lot for sanitary sewer. Our policy is to charge the cost of the assessment plus five percent interest on the assessment to the date of hook -up. This is the standard used throughout the City for any location. In the Dahlquist Addition, four new lots hooked -up to the sewer line and therefore, need to pay the principal of $7,354.28 for four hook -ups plus 5% interest until the date of hook -up. This results in an estimated sewer hook -up charge of $19,000.00 for the four lots. The interest accrued over twenty years since the original assessment. (OVER) Report /Recommendation Agenda Item VI.C. Page Two Mr. Dahlquist feels that the price is too high, particularly with the fact that Ruth Schaefer gave the City an easement to cross the property. This easement allowed a shorter distance, thus less total construction cost. The staff attaches two letters from Mr. Dahlquist which indicate his concern that the interest charge should not go on forever or not be charged because the existing property owner provided a service to the City. Both Mr. Dahlquist and staff have researched Council minutes and project documents, and we do not find any clear indication to what final disposition should occur in this matter. Obviously, staff would follow normal procedure and policy unless directed differently. Staff is referring this to City Council for review of existing policy and any change that Council may wish to consider on this issue. 5012 Schaefer Road Edina, MN 55436 April 23, 1993 Mr. Fran Hoffman City of Edina. 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman, Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a letter dated March 12, 1993, addressed to you. Since the time I wrote that letter, I have given additional thought to the matter of interest for some 20 years being added to the sanitary sewer connection charges for our subdivision. I hope the Edina City Council will give serious consideration to this problem. In order to reach an equitable solution, I believe it would be helpful to go back again to the March 6, 1972 Edina Village Council meeting at which the P -SS -303 project was adopted. The sewer was urgently needed to eliminate severe pollution, but there was a big problem, namely cost. The sewer line on Ridge Road needed to be very deep to serve houses on the East side and this is very costly. In addition, I suspect that this would have been too deep to flow into the line on Interlachen Boulevard without a lift station (expensive initially and constantly.) This situation made it necessary for the Edina Village Engineer to design an alternate route serving the East side houses from the rear, but this required running the line across the land owned by Ruth Schaefer. Thus, she was drawn into the project which was much more expensive than average. This is because it meant putting in twice the length to serve the same number of houses on Ridge Road, plus extending to Schaefer Road (which part, incidentally, was the least expensive.) A look at the map shows the double distance and also how the line zig -zags through the back yards and every zig required a manhole, a total of 21, while only 5 would have been required on Ridge Road alone. Under these circumstances, the Edina Village manager, Mr. Warren Hyde, negotiated with Ruth Schaefer. Since both have passed away, also Village Engineer, Mr. Robert Dunn, we have only the records of the council meeting to rely on. Mr. Hyde's statement, quoted from the minutes, follows: "Six lots are deferred and those lots will pay the connection charge if and when the property is subdivided." It is clear that "if and when" gives complete freedom to the land owner to decide about subdivision. However, adding the burden of a constantly increasing interest charge takes away from that freedom and actually makes "if and when" almost meaningless. It is most significant that Mr. Hyde made no mention of interest. In agreements where interest is to be charged, it always is carefully specified. Since this was not done, we can only assume that they agreed there would be no interest. My dictionary defines "defer" as to put off to a future time. How can interest be charged on an assessment that hasn't yet been made? In the notice of public hearing signed by Mr. Robert C. Dunn, mailed to residents prior to the hearing of March 6, 1972, it also states it is proposed that assessments against properties not directly abutting Ridge Road would be deferred until connections are made. It also states that interest charged on the unpaid balance will not exceed 7 %. This indicates two things: 1. He was well aware that interest is an important factor. 2. He would have stated PAYMENTS would be deferred if it was intended to charge interest. The fact that he wrote ASSESSMENTS would be deferred has a totally different connotation regarding when the charges would be effective. What did the land owner get from this agreement? The figures are in the first letter mentioned above. Suffice it to say the total costs are about double what the cost would be, even at today's prices, to install a simple system connected to the sewer main in Schaefer Road. We did agree to relocate a portion of the existing line at our expense and will do so, but it still is an expense that would not occur if the present line never had been built. The Village of Edina, acting for the residents of Ridge Road, saved them a bundle of money, and this is commendable. However, I relieve it is very unfair to the present owners of the Schaefer property to be required now to pay $9222 per connection as a result of a favor done by Ruth Schaefer 21 years ago. This compares to the charge of $4036 per connection to the lots on Ridge Road. Please find a way to save the present owners of the former Schaefer property from being treated so unfairly. Please give this matter your immediate attention. Very truly y urs, Mark S. Dalqu /st 5012 Schaefer Road Edina, MN 55436 March 12, 1993 Mr. Fran Hoffman, City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman, We have spoken of this matter in the oast and you're familiar with the details. I have decided it might be helpful if I put in a letter some thoughts I have on the charges the City of Edina is contemplating for sewer connections in the Dalquist subdivision. First, I believe we can reasonably assume that Edina Manager Mr. Warren Hyde and the then -owner of the property, Mrs. Harold (Ruth) Schaefer, reached an agreement regarding the sewer line easement that would be beneficial to both parties. Edina benefited by realizing substantial savings for the benefited property owners and Ruth Schaefer benefited by being assured of sewer connections at a fixed price, not subject to inflation and interest, whenever she decided to subdivide. It was a win - win situation. The minutes of the Edina Village Council meeting on Monday, March 6, 1972 stipulated: The total estimated construction costs $117,038.41, proposed to be assessed against 29 assessable lots at an estimated per cost of $4,035.80. To quote Mr. Warren Hyde, "Six lots are deferred and those lots will pay the connection charge if and when the property is subdivided." Nothing was said about interest. However, we are presently being asked to pay over twice as much as the original agreement provided. I believe it would be totally unfair to charge us a greater amount than it would cost us (assuming the present sewer line had never been installed) to install our own line, even at present -day prices. I have ball -park figures that come to about $27,000 for such an installation, including the Schall house. The information I have now indicates that we would have to pay over $55,000 broken down as follows: 5 connections, $20,000. Relocate a section of the present line, 18,000. Interest 17,331. For the present owners to have to pay an extra $28,000 plus, for a favor done for Edina 20 years ago seems patently unfair to me. I hope you will make every possible effort to rectify this situation. Sincerely, Mark S. Dalquist Tel..938 -4402, home 927 -7996, ext. 315, office Copy to Mr. Ken Rosland �gZr1A. o e 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards and City Council Agenda Item # VI. D From: Bob Kojetin Consent ❑ Information Only Fx] Date: June 3, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Senior Center ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: At one of the past city council meetings the question of the relationship and the programs that are being held at the Senior Center in the Community Center was discussed. At this time I am enclosing a copy of the program and the operation that has occurred over the past 12 months when we officially moved into the new location at the Community Center. EDINA SENIOR CENTER AND EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION COOPERATIVE PROGRAMING The Edina Senior Center and Edina Community Education programs have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship in the development of classes and programs designed for senior citizens. One of the earliest cooperative programs was the evening travelogue series, which was well attended for several years. In 1982 the woodshop was made available for seniors' use. The Director of Community Education and Director of the Senior Center collaborated in designing and implementing this program that has served seniors for the last decade. In 1986 the same directors shared ideas and facilities in making the popular Defensive Driving program available to seniors. The Edina Senior Center moved to the Community Center in January of 1989. One of our first tasks was to reach an agreement with Community Education with regard to classes held at our previous location (7151 York). The city and the school district reached a verbal agreement which follows: *The city will not offer any classes on a permanant basis, only experimental •Community Education will not offer trips and tours As a result of this agreement: *The Senior Center turned over: •Beginning and Intermediate Bridge with Louise Rossini •Whittling with Bill Jaglo, *Swedish Exercise with Margret Nelson *All 55+ classes would be co- sponsored by Community Education and the Senior Center. (see enclosed sheet #1) *Community Education would take care of registration, costs and advertising. All monies would go to them. •The Senior Center would advertise in its monthly brochure and would provide space in the Senior Center when needed and available. (see enclosed sheet #2A & 2B) •Experimental classes may be started by the Senior Center and, if found successful, are turned over to Community Education, examples: *Line Dancing •Gems e Upon request Community Education will set up classes for the Senior Center, examples: •Tai Chi •Creative Writing •Clogging In June of 1992 the Senior Center was moved to -its present location. The new facility accommodates a number of varied activities because of optimal use of overall space. We now have five smaller rooms compared to the one large room available earlier. Fourteen new programs have been initiated in the past ten months. (see enclosed sheet #3) The relationship between the Senior Center and Commmunity Education is cooperative rather that competitive. Our mutual respect has enabled both facilities to provide a comprehesive array of programs and classes to best serve our senior population in Edina. Beauty For the Mature Woman Come and learn the special secrets of skin care and makeup artistry for women who are "fifty to eighty- something ". We'll talk about shape of glasses, hairstyles, and other unique concerns. #9047A Friday January 29 10:00 -11:30 a.m. Connie Larson 1 session. $12 Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 Bridge with Louise - Beginning Let our Life Master and bridge teacher extraordina!re teach you the basics of this fascinating card game. Learn to bid and to play modern bridge in ten easy lessons - the FUN WAY. #9001A Thursdays Jan. 21-Mar. 25 10:00 a.m. -Noon Louise Rossini 10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 Bridge with Louise - Intermediate Put more fun and skill Into your bridge game. This course includes review of the basics followed by some advanced techniques In play and defense. #9041A Tuesdays Jan. 19 -Mar. 23 1:00 -3:00 p.m. Louise Rossini 10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 #90416 Thursdays Jan. 21 -Mar. 25 1:00 -3:00 p.m. Louise Rossini 10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 Coping With Change Everything changes and usually takes us by surprise even when we think we're prepared for It. Discover why change is so hard and how you can help yourself. By exploring some predictable patterns, you can better chart your coursr through the unfamiliar terrain of change. Come for a lively discussion with your contemporaries. The Instruc- tor is on the faculty of the College of St. Catherine and Is the director of "Aging Well," a wellness consulting service. #9093A Mondays March 1 & 8 9:30.11:00 a.m. Carol Walker 2 sessions - $8 Edina Comm. Center Door 4, Room 341 Creative Writing Get started on the "write" way to remember. Memories and old times will come alive through the writing process. Your friends and family will enjoy seeing and hearing your stories. Write nowl #9083A Thursdays February 4-25 1:00 -3:00 p.m. Shirley Whiting 4 sessions - $18 Edina Comm. Center Boor 2, Room 306 Exercise for 55f Exercise is so important for good health! Relax, stretch, and build your strength and stamina in a pleasant environment with your contemporaries. You will work at your own pace. Please bring a mat or large towel. Carol Walker is 55+ herself and is director of "Aging Well," a wellness consulting service. #9017A Fridays Feb. 12 -Mar. 26 8:30.9:30 a.m. Carol Walker ' 7 sessions - $12 Edina Comm. Center Door 9, Room 235 Line Dancing Get on the Line Dancing bandwagon! Dapce without a partner. Eastern and copntry western line dancing Is fun, and good exercise. Easy, step -by -step instruc- tion will have you doing the hottest trend in dancing. Wear tennis shoes. Section A at 11:30 is for advanced students, Sections B and C are for continuing students. We will review and learn new dances. Beginners are wel- come in Section B. Written Instruction and music Is available so you can practice at home. #9079A Thursdays Jan. 28-Mar. 18 11:30am- 12:30pmFran DeWell (Advanced) Edina Comm. Center 8 sessions - $20 ) Door 2, Room 301 #90796 Thursdays Jan. 28-Mar. 18 12:45 -1:45 p.m. Fran DeWell (Cont. & Beg.) Edina Comm. Center 8 sessions - $20 Door 2, Room 301 #9079C Thursdays Jan. 28-Mar. 18 2:00.3:00 p.m. Fran DeWell (Continuing) Edina Comm. Center 8 sessions - S20 Door 2, Room 301 Defensive Driving 55t Minnesota State law requires insurance companies to offer a 10% discount for three years to drivers over 55 who complete this course. It has no connec- tion with your driving record and does not involve any driving or testing. Developed by the National Safety Council, the Defensive Driving course has a proven record of accident and traffic violation reduction. You will receive a certificntle of completion to provide to your insurance company. Please indicate your driver's license number on your registration form. 'Tuition covers course materials and lunch. Co- sponsored by the MN Safety Council. #9005A Mon. & Tues. Jan. 25 & 26 10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions • $22' #9005B Thurs. & Fri. Feb. 18 & 19 10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22' 09005C Mon. &Tues. March 8 & 9 10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22' #9005D Mon. & Tues. March 29 & 30 10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22' All Defensive Driving claasses meet at the Edina Community Center room 350 with instructor Bob Vandenberg. Dad Had Skinny Legs... And Other Family Tales Discover easy, creative ways to capture your favorite family stories now, before they're lost. Geared for nonwriters of all ages, this class shows you how to jog memories (yours and others), gather stories and package them in attractive ways. 'A "Do- It- Yourself Family Histories Book" ($11) Is Included in the tuition. Nancy Pengra Is the owner and founder of Family Histories, a business that helps people preserve their life stories. #8016A Friday February 5 9:00 -11:30 a.m. Nancy Pengra 1 session - $18' Edina Comm. Center Door 4, Room 341 18016M Thursday February 18 6:30.9:00 p.m. Nancy Pengra 1 session - $18' Edina Comm. Center Door 4, Room 341 * See the back of this flyer for more classes and registration Information Modeling + Acting for the Mature Talent The Twin Cities market Is in need of the "mature talent" - both men and women. If you've ever thought about getting involved in the commercial, film, or odeling Industry, now is the time to pursue your dreams. Find out more from a model who runs her own model management company in the area. #9073A Friday February 5 10:00.11:30 a.m. Sheryl Sigfridson 1 session - $8 Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 m-_ri `,,red Not Tired! ii °r =.z` =e retired, about to retire, or just thinking about re!;:j� rent, you'll want to make the best uz& of your new -found time and I;! -.,­standing talent In ways that are il-1ying for you. Check out your .- % : °fives for a possible new car;, 3rri how to slow down or shift Re- c stay productive. Discover D best use career and volunteer z-se. Don't wonder what it would .i:e to "do something" again! Do Itl .-.;t of handouts ($2) is Included in the ion. Sharon Sundre isn't retired yet, i,::t she enjoys thinking about it! She is a career consultant and former English teacher. 99095A Monday March 15 9:30 -11:30 a.m. Sharon Sundre 1 session - S9' Edina Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 Soft Aerobics For 55+ IGHq Gentle on your Jointsl This class in- cludes a warm -up, strengthening phase, 20 -25 minutes of low Impact (no bounce) aerobics and a cool down/ relaxation phase. Please bring a small mat and wear tennis or aerobic shoes. #9029A Mon. & Wed. Jan. 25 -Mar. 24 9:00.10:00 a.m. Grace Wagnild (No Class Feb. 15) Edina Comm. Center 17 sessions - $29 Door 2, Room 301 #90296 Tuesdays Jan. 2&Mar.16 8:15.9:15 a.m. Bette Hostad 8 sessions - $14 Edina Comm. Center Door 9, Room 235 Should I Sell My House? The decision to sell your home can seem overwhelming, especially when you have been out of the real estate market for some time. Learn about the "process" of selling your home, Including inspec- tions, purchase agreements and more. Come and get your questions answered. 19081A Monday January 2S 10:00 -1130 a.m. Sue Corson 1 session - $4 Edina_ Comm. Center Door 2, Room 311 Whittling Group Join fellow wood carvers on Tuesday afternoons to share ideas and learn from each other. Everyone is welcome - from beginner to advanced whittlers. (During spring quarter we will have whittling class with an instructor.) #9037A Tuesdays Jan. 12 -Mar. 23 1:00.3:00 p.m. Volunteers 11 ses. - $5 dues Edina Comm. Center Door 6, Room 159 Swedish Fitness II Come for the fun and health benefits of this low intensity class for men and women. Work at your own pace on flexibility, light aerobics, strength and relaxation activities set to music. Bring a mat and wear loose fitting clothes and tennis shoes. #9033A Mondays Jan. 25 -Mar. 22 8:00.9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson (No Class Feb. 15) Edina Comm. Center 8 sessions - $16 Door 9, Room 235 #9033M Tuesdays Jan. 26 -Mar. 23 6:00.1:00 p.m. Margret S. Nelson 9 sessions - $16 Edina Comm. Center Door 9, Room 235 #9033B Wednesdays Jan. 27 -Mar. 24 8:00.9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson (No Class Feb. 10) Edina Comm. Center 8 sessions - $16 Door 9, Room 235 09033C Thursdays Jan. 28 -Mar. 25 8:00 -9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson 9 sessions - $16 Edina Comm..Centet -.., Door 9, Room 235° Tennis for 55+ Brush up on your tennis skills. For senior players of any level. Our pro will give you an ability rating and help you find places to continue to play tennis this winter. Bring your racquet and a new can of balls. #9049M Tuesdays Jan. 26 -Feb. 23 SAS -6:45 p.m. Nick Pappas 5 sessions - $20 Edina High School Door 7, Field House REGISTRATION INFORMATION 24 Hour Registration Hotline Call 220 -4644 anytime with your touch tone phone. Have your VISA /Mastercard and course information ready. By Mail Just fill out the form and mall It with your check or charge card number to: Edina Community Education Services 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 By Phone Have your VISA or Mastercard number ready when you call us at 927-9725. Office hours are Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. In Person Visit our office at the Edina Community Center. Park at the north entrance and enter:door K, Make your check payable to: Edina Public Schools. ----------------------- REGISTRATION FORM FOR ADULT CLASSES I I Name I I Address - -- I CRY zip I I Home Phone Work Phone I I Age Group: _ 19 -54 years 55 years & over I COURSE # COURSE TITLE BEG. DATE TIME FEE i I $ I I � I TOTAL........ ..............................5 — Charge to my 0 Mastercard Visa Account Charge Card Number - I Ems. Date — — Sgna— — — — — RO MONDAY TUESDAY WED AY THURSDAY FRIDAY URDAY 311 *Great Book *Swedish *Open bridge *Beginning Bridge *Beauty for the JADE Discussion *Intermediate *Intermediate Mature woman •U of M visit to Bridge Bridge 0500 Sr. Center 303 *Taxes •Blood Pressure *Taxes •Spelling /Scrabble •Chorus extra *Showtime /Charac PLATINUM *Chorus •Softball rehearsals ters for Stage *Meaningful Registration *Book Club Media +MRPA meetings *Harmonikers +ARLE meetings *Newsletter *In Depth assembly Relaxation "TCPC 306 •Caregivers *Western - Jewerly *Grandmothers *Computer •Podiatrist ROSE *Applique for Peace *Creative Writing *Slide *Hearing test presentation N D 304 work room work room work room work room work room PEACH coffeelvisiting coffee /visiting coffee /visiting coffee /visiting coffee /visiting area/small area/small area area area meetings meeting *Sr. Advisory *Sr. Golf Board *Softball Planning Council meeting meeting *Bowling Banquet meeting 308 sopen pool *open pool *open pool •open pool •open pool EMERALD KEY • Senior Activities + Adaptive Recreation Programs * Community Education Class The above diagram indicates usage of Senior Center rooms by Senior Programs, Adaptive " Independent Group Programs, Community Education and Independent Programs during the month of April 1993 COORDINATION OF PROGRAMS BETWEEN SENIOR CENTER AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION In addition to the regular Senior Program schedule, the following spring Community Education Classes were offered in the Senior Center. JADE - 311 Beginning Bridge Intermediate Bridge Swedish Beauty for the Mature Woman Acting for the Mature Woman PLATINUM - 303 In Depth Relaxation Showtime /Characters for Stage Meaningful Media ROSE - 306 Creative Writing How to Sell Book Ideas Western Jewelry Making Applique Classes that have transferred from the Senior Program to Community Education. 1. Bridge with Louise Beginning Intermediate 2. Whittling 3. Swedish Exercise Active Less Active 4. Line Dancing Beginning Intermediate 5. Gems /Tap Group 6. Informational meetings regarding Wills, Estate Planning, Investments, etc. Classes requested by Senior Program but given through Community Education. 1. Defensive Driving 2. Tai Chi 3. Craft Classes Punch Embroidery Sweatshirt Decorating Beading 4. Relaxation 5. Creative Writing 6. Social Dance #2B EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Edina Senior Center - Recreation Program Membership: 1460 seniors CURRENT SENIOR PROGRAMS Regional Chapter of Metropolitan Senior Federation C. ROGRAMMED WITH PLATINUM ROOM - 303 COMMUNITY EDUCATION Performing Senior Band Tap Dancing Instructions Senior Singing Group Whittling Instructions Monthly Newsletter assembly Wood Shop Various Volunteer work Bridge Instructions . Piano Duets -NEW Exercise Instructions Free income tax service Craftmaking Instructions Annual Spelling Bee Defensive Driving Instructions Intergenerational Spelling Bee Creative Writing Class -NEW Advisory Council -NEW Line Dancing -NEW Volunteer .Recognition Motivational /Informational Speakers EDINBOROUGH PARK Senior Workshops Trips and Tours Scrabble -NEW Men's Volleyball Group Spelling Skills Group Birthday Celebration(4 times) Community Ed. 55+ Classes Line Dancing Party(4 times) -NEW VAN VALKENBURG PARK Men's Softball League C 'HTOWN BOWL b. _ag League Open Bowling COMMUNITY CENTER AUDITORIUM Performing Senior Tap Group Men's Tap Dancing Group -NEW Beginning Tap for Performing -NEW Gems Annual Variety Show Speakers RICH ACRES GOLF COURSE Golf League 1994 at Normandale -NEW COMMUNITY CENTER ENTRYWAY Flu Shot Clinic Commodities Distribution Annual Holiday Bazaar VARIETY OF PLACES V " ig Group Knitting for Childrens Home 7151 York Senior Luncheon ROSE ROOM -306 Computer Interest Group Problem solving with on -site computer -NEW Caregivers Support Group -NEW Photo Group /Slide Presentations Blood Pressure Checks Hearing Tests Podiatrist Grandmothers for Peace -NEW Book Club -NEW Community Ed. 55+ Classes JADE ROOM - 311 Great Book Discussion Group -NEW Bridge 500 Community Ed. 55+ Classes EMERALD ROOM - 308 Billiards FUTURE PROGRAMS Full Time Secretary Current Affairs Discussion Groups Library Quilt Instruction and Assembly Billiard Instructions Open Card Day Clogging Senior Community Sing -in #3 Amateur Performing night or day oe" 0 • ,N�bRPOMtit'V • age REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: TED PAULFRANZ, FIRE CHIEF Date: 14AY 10, 1993 i Subject: FIRE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT AND FIRE EDUCATION DISPLAI JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI . F Consent Ii Information Only Mgr. Recommends j17 To HRA !I To Council Action `! Motion x Resolution Ordinance Discussion Adoption of attached resolution and approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement and Fire Education Display Joint Services Agreement. Info /Background: The attached agreements are the result of the combined efforts of numerous individuals, including fire chiefs, city manager, city attorneys and others. (See attached memorandum.) J. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 10, 1993 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief SUBJECT: MAJOR OBJECTIVES INVOLVED IN RE -WRITE OF MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT The following items represent the primary issues causing us to re -write the existing Mutual Aid document: 1. This new document is a restructuring of an existing agreement. This re -write is prepared in terms understandable to the users, Fire Chiefs. We are not creating a new public policy or association. The original document dates from 1949. What is developed is a new system to make sharing resources easier. The agreement itself is designed to give general legal authority for mutual aid. 2. This Agreement is a framework document which is specifically written to be broad based and flexible. The details will be contained in the Association rules; currently our by -laws. 3. The Agreement was written to reflect the changing roles and responsibilities of our fire departments. It allows us to share resources and cooperate in emergency, non - emergency, specialized and extraordinary activities, as defined. 4. There are provisions in the agreement for the billing of costs involved with specialized and extraordinary activities. Our intent is that this charge would only be for those specialized activities, not traditional mutual aid. S. This is a Joint Powers Agreement but it does not create a joint powers organization. The Association will own no property nor will it dispense funds, other than nominal amounts for administration. 6. The name of the organization was changed from the Southwest Fire League to the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. 7. Appendix "A" for the new agreement includes the City of Excelsior. 8. Under Section VI, provision has been made to provide for reciprocal defense and indemnification of the parties to this agreement. Our purpose and intent is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflict between the parties. 9. The purpose of the second agreement enclosed is to allow Minnetonka to own the Fire Safety House. It is not appropriate for the Association to own property. TRP /ras PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 1 WHEREAS, the City of has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the southwest suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment; WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; and WHEREAS, the participating agencies have determined that it is advisable to clarify and simplify the language of that agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of , Minnesota, that the revised Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of Fire Personnel and Equipment, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Personnel And Equipment Agreement EXHIBIT A City of Bloomington: City of Minnetonka: Bloomington Fire Dept. Minnetonka Fire Dept. 2215 Old Shakopee Rd. 14550 Minnetonka Blvd. Bloomington, MN 55431 Minnetonka, MN 55345 City of Chanhassen: City of Plymouth: Chanhassen Fire Dept. Plymouth Fire Dept. 7610 Laredo Dr., Box 97 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Plymouth, MN 55447 City of Eden Prairie: City of Richfield: Eden Prairie Fire Dept... Richfield Dept. of Pub. Safety 7801 Mitchell Rd. 6700 Portland Ave. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Richfield, MN 55423 City of Edina: City of St. Louis Park: Edina Fire Dept. St. Louis Park Fire Dept. 6250 Tracy Ave. 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of Excelsior: City of Wayzata: Excelsior Fire Dept. Wayzata Fire Dept. 339 3rd Street 600 Rice St. Excelsior, MN 55331 Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Golden Valley: Metropolitan Airport Commission: Golden Valley Fire Dept. Airport Fire Dept. 7800 Golden Valley Rd. 6307 34th Ave. S. Golden Valley, MN 55427 Minneapolis, MN 55440 City of Hopkins: V.A. Fort Snelling Hopkins Fire Dept. Fire Dept. /138 Bldg. 70 1010 1st St. S. One Veterans Drive Hopkins, MN 55343 Minneapolis, MN 55417 3 -4-93 Southwest Mutual Aid Association joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment I. PURPOSE This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, which authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to contracting Parties. The Parties to this Agreement wish to create a regional Mutual Aid Association, hereafter called the Southwest Mutual Aid Association, for the purpose of making equipment, personnel and facilities available to each other upon request. This Agreement is intended to give each Party the authority to send its equipment and personnel into the other communities and to provide for an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement. II. DEFINITION OF TERMS For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the meanings given them below. Subd. 1. "Assistance" means the providing of fire personnel and equipment, fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training personal and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 2. "Emergency" means a sudden and unforeseen situation requiring immediate action. Subd. 3. "Party" means a governmental unit which is a Party to this Agreement. Subd. 4. "Requesting Official" means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from other Parties. Subd. 5. "Requesting Party" means a Party which requests Assistance from other Parties. Subd. 6. "Responding Official" means the person designated by a Party who is responsible to determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a Requesting Party. Subd. 7. "Responding Party" means a Party which provides Assistance to a Requesting Party. Subd. 8. . "Specialized Activities" means non - emergency Assistance to include but not be limited to: fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training personal and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 9. "Extraordinary Services" means emergency Assistance that includes activities beyond the normal scope of fire fighting, such as hazardous materials incidents, high level rescue, or dive rescue. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493 Page 2 III. PARTIES The Parties to this Agreement are listed on attached Exhibit A and constitute the membership the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. Other entities may become a Party to this Agreement by complying with the conditions provided in the Association rules and by applying to and receiving approval of all member Parties. Any Party may withdraw from membership at any time upon thirty days written notice to the other members. Action by any Party which is required or. permitted under this Agreement will be evidenced by: • for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or • for a non - municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that party which recites the basis of that authority. IV. PROCEDURE Subd. 1. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for Assistance from other Parties, such Requesting Official may, at his /her discretion, call upon the Responding Official of any other Party to furnish Assistance to and within the boundaries of the Requesting Party. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, it is the intention of the Parties to this Agreement to cooperate in the event of an emergency by making the necessary Assistance available to a Requesting Party without undue delay. Subd. 2. Upon the receipt of a request for Assistance from a Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct the Fire Department personnel under his /her control to provide Assistance to the Requesting, Party. Whether the Responding Party provides such Assistance to the Requesting Party and, if so, to what extent such Assistance is provided shall be determined solely by the Responding Official (subject to such supervision and direction as may be applicable to him /her within the governmental structure of the Party by which he /she is employed). Failure to provide Assistance will not result in liability to a Party. Subd. 3. When a Responding Party provides Assistance under the terms of this Agreement, it may in turn request Assistance from other Parties as "backup" during the time that it is providing Assistance outside its boundaries. Subd. 4. Whenever a Responding Party has provided Assistance to a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may at any time recall such Assistance or any part thereof if the Responding Official in his /her best judgment deems such recall necessary to provide for the best interests of his /her own community. Such action will not result in liability to any Party. Subd. 5. The Requesting Party shall be in command of the emergency scene. The personnel and equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be under the direction and control of the Requesting Party until the Responding Official withdraws Assistance. Subd. 6. A Responding Party shall be responsible for its own personnel, equipment, and for injuries or death to any such personnel or damage to any such equipment, except that unused equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be returned to the Responding Party by the Requesting Party when circumstances permit this to be done. Responding personnel shall be deemed to be performing their regular duties for the Responding Party. Insurance coverage and any financial compensation shall be the responsibility of the Responding Party. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any workers compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party, its officers, employees, or volunteers. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493 Page 3 Subd. 7. Specialized activities of a non- emergency nature may be requested and/ or provided by the Parties to this Agreement. Subd. 8. No charge shall be made to a Party for Assistance rendered under this Agreement except that a Party providing Assistance shall be paid for the cost of supplies. A Party providing Assistance may charge for time and materials for Specialized Activities and Extraordinary Service as provided for in the association rules. V. OPERATING COMMITTEE The association shall have an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement. Subd. 1. The Chief of each Party's Fire Department, or designee, shall be the Party's representative to the Association Operating Committee. Subd. 2. It is the responsibility of the Operating Committee to establish rules, policies, and standards and to take other necessary or prudent action to administer this Agreement. Subd. 3. The Operating Committee shall meet periodically, but not less than quarterly to conduct the business of the Association. Subd. 4. The Association is not a separate legal entity. The Operating Committee shall have no authority to own property, enter into contracts, or to receive and expend funds except for routine administrative expenses. VI. RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION The Requesting Party agrees to indemnify and defend against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officers, employees, or volunteers of the Responding Party for injury or death to any third person or persons, or damage to the property of third persons, arising out of the performance and provision of Assistance in responding to a request for Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement. The intent of the indemnification requirement of this section is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify any Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party's jurisdiction subject to the liability limits under Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes. The purpose of creating these reciprocal duties to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay, on behalf of itself and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the liability limits established in Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes, applicable to only one Party. The limits of liability for some or all Parties may not be added together to increase the maximum statutory liability limits for any Party. VII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all of the Parties listed on the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein. Each Party shall execute a separate signature page and forward that page to the Association Secretary, along with a resolution or letter as provided in Section III. Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a copy of the fully executed agreement to each .member. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493 Page 7 Date: CITY OF EDINA By Its And Its Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3-4-93 Southwest Allutual Aid Association Joint Services Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display 1. Parties. The Parties to this Agreement are the members of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association (the "Association "), as may be now constituted or hereafter revised. Any Party which joins.the Association after the execution of the Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment shall automatically be a Party to this Agreement. 2. Background. The Association has obtained a fire education display in the form of a small house on a movable trailer (the "display "). This Agreement is intended to clarify ownership and use of the display and responsibility for scheduling, maintaining, and storing the display. 3. Ownership. The City of Minnetonka shall own the display and be responsible for obtaining property damage insurance covering the value of the display. 4. Use. All members of the Association shall have the opportunity to use the display without charge, in accordance with reasonable scheduling requirements to be determined by the Operating Committee of the Association ( "Operating Committee 5. Operations. The Operating Committee shall be responsible for all decisions regarding the use and operation of the display, including its disposition. The Operating Committee shall designate which members have the responsibility for scheduling, maintaining and storing the display. 6. Costs. If a Party incurs costs for performing a responsibility under paragraphs 3 or 5 of this Agreement which are beyond the costs that the Party would otherwise incur, the Party may submit an invoice to the Association Secretary for reimbursement of those costs. The costs may be paid out of normal Association dues or the Secretary may separately invoice each member for an equal share of those costs. Each Association member shall pay the invoice within 35 days after the invoice date. 7. Disposition. If the Operating Committee votes to dispose of the display, any funds received shall be placed in the Association's general fund or disbursed equally to all Association members, as determined by the Operating Committee. The City of Minnetonka agrees to relinquish ownership of the display if the Operating Committee votes to dispose of the display. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display, 3 -4 -93 Page 2 8. Indemnification. Each Party agrees to defend and indemnify all other Parties for any claims resulting from incidents which occurred while the display was in the Party's possession, subject to the liability limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. Under no circumstances shall a Party be required to pay, on behalf of itself and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the liability limits for that Party under Chapter 466. The liability limits for some or all of the Parties may not be added together to increase the maximum statutory liability for any Party. 9. Waiver of Subrogation. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any worker's compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party, its officer, employees, or volunteers. 10. Termination. Any Party which terminates its membership in the Association shall automatically be terminated as a Party to this Agreement effective the same date. In addition, any Party may terminate its participation in this Agreement, without terminating its membership in the Association, by giving 90 days advance written notice to the Association Secretary. 11. Change in Ownership. If the City of Minnetonka or a subsequent owner wishes to divest itself of ownership, it may give 90 days advance written notice to the Association Secretary that its ownership will cease. The Association Operating Committee may seek another member to assume ownership. The City of Minnetonka, or a subsequent owner, may transfer ownership of the display to any other member without approval from the other Association members or an amendment to this Agreement. Any Party which assumes ownership shall also assume the rights and obligations of the City of Minnetonka pursuant to paragraphs 3, 6, and 7. If no other Party wishes to assume ownership, the Operating Committee shall either dispose of the display or make other arrangements satisfactory to the Association. 12. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all of the Parties listed on the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein. Each Party shall execute a separate signature page and forward that page to the Association Secretary, along with the following: • for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or • for a non - municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that party which recites the basis of that authority. Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a copy of the fully executed agreement to each member. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display, 3 -493 Page 6 Date: CITY OF EDINA Its And Its Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display 3 -4-93 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the southwest suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire personnel.and equipment; WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; and WHEREAS, the participating agencies have determined that it is advisable to clarify and simplify the language of that agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina , Minnesota, that the revised Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of Fire Personnel and Equipment, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 7, 1993, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of June, 1993. Marcella M. Dae n City Clerk RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a member of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; WHEREAS, the Association has purchased a fire education display in the form of a small house on a movable trailer ( "the display "); WHEREAS, additional insurance is not required if the display is owned by one of the members rather than by the Association; and WHEREAS, an agreement providing for the ownership, use, scheduling, maintenance, and storage of the display is in the best interests of all Association members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina , Minnesota, that the Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint Services Agreement for Use of Fire Education Display, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLEF& I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 7, 1993, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of June, 1993. Marcella M. Dae n City Clerk e o N REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # -ii—.G From: Ceil Smith Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: June 3, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject :Approval of Labor R❑ To Council Agreement Between the Action ❑ Motion City and Local 49 of the Operating Engineers El Resolution Representing Public Works and Park Maintenance ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Approve the Labor Contract for 1993 between the City and Local 49. Info /Background: The following items were agreed to for the 1993 contract period: 1. Wages - 3% increase. 2. Employer Contribution to Flex Plan (Insurance) - Increase $10.00 Per Month. 3. Overtime - Contract Language Change. 4. Work Schedule - Language Change. S. Supplemental Uniform Allowance of $100.00. This agreement is within budget. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION tl // To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item I.. vz . x - From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent % X Information Only �I Date: NNE 7; 1993 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA Subject: C To Council CONTRACT - IAFF #1275 Action Ex Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance C Discussion Recommendation: Authorize execution of 1993 contract with firefighters. Info /Background: Staff and representatives of the International Association of Firefighters Local #1275 have concluded negotiations concerning the 1993 contract. The proposed contract provides for a 1993 wage adjustment of 3 percent, a $10.00 per month increase in the City's contribution toward City provided benefits and a $15 per year increase in the uniform allowance for each firefighter. In addition, the proposed contract clarifies that firefighters which are assigned to work on July 4th are eligible for an additional one -half time pay. The proposed contract also provides an incentive for members of the bargaining unit to participate in fitness activities during off -duty times. This incentive provides for a maximum $20.00 per month contribution towards memberships in clubs providing aerobic activities. Payment is conditioned upon evidence that the participating firefighter participated in health club. activities at least twice weekly. In consideration of this incentive, the bargaining unit has agreed to a 50 percent reduction in the educational incentive program for newly hired employees. Staff believes that the proposed contract is within the budget guidelines of the Council and therefore recommends approval of the 1993 contract. A. r o; REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor &" City Council Agenda Item # VI.I• From: Francis Hoffman / Consent 0 City Engineer j Information Only ❑ Date: 7 June, 1993 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Public Hearing - El To Council Feasibility Report and Set Hearing Date Action 0 Motion Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -383 ❑ Resolution Post Lane Ordinance ❑ Recommendation: Set hearing date of June 21, 1993. Info /Background: The following proposed project has been reviewed and is considered feasible: Location: Post Lane Improvement: SS -383 Sanitary Sewer Estimated Cost - $ 18,913.71 Staff would suggest possible hearing date of June 21, 1993. Funding for SS -383 would be from proposed assessment. ( 'Am AGENDA ITEM VII.A MEMORANDUM TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Bill Bernhjelm, Police Chief DATE: June 4, 1993 SUBJECT: Letter from Irving Cobb regarding animal complaint I spoke with Jeff Elasky regarding Mr. Cobb's letter. There apparently is a mis- communication, as Jeff stated that he would not discuss a Minneapolis ordinance with a resident in this type of case. He did say that he spoke with Mr. Cobb, the dog owner, and another neighbor regarding this situation. The dog owner was cooperative and sensitive to Mr. Cobb's concerns. The dog is currently undergoing obedience training and is being kept indoors unless attended by the owner. The other neighbor didn't have a problem with the dog. No other complaints have been received. The Minneapolis ordinance was checked on by Cell Smith. She said that the only time permission of neighbors would be needed is in a case where an owner wished to keep more than two dogs. At this time there appears to be no basis to proceed under the Dangerous Dog Provisions of City Code or any other sections of the Code. WB /nk ,!� Iz Li I,A Lip, awl" J �v v .. � / �: "lam. .�- /�'� r j ' ' -• � .. .. .,: ' ... : - •.�(.;'S- '.J.::w:sit"::: .- ,- t- e,•zfw� v. •. .. ..:...;,. yn'_ .- '.:.s."rc__':�- ���,c�'__..�. �:.'.r'.�- i±.x',r3G_1°'� . .. ._c: -+r •: _. i'j'.�.,'�O_ -_'`, •.,•,;,.;� - :rr.sxxd.:s,r.,w;tt -� y.c:'r: •'-= '�`ii4i"�. �°-1- �:,,zs�: r, e'.��..- ::.sS. v' .., �'..., py :- °- 4���°..�"- .- �-- .- .,��.. ---. ->i -{rw - .J,. - n.91Y:.•�.r:. ,L.,.....-K. y "�f- °Y�..i.M_oi ,J _ ,- 4.:.4'•'f�.:"`.�Tn• IK Ov LO - - - '•'t.' _ _ mod_ _.:.:i;� ° ^ ?... 7 S':!. `;,;c: J-.- '�:�,=s to �'= -��-�- :s's -':�:.``J _"";%ate z�' -:�: r:+�..:=: •*s :z-r :.'�•+"�;'�''.-- ;.v.'-�:5•:' - ,— .+>r�t:: -: �`=a= t =ra�"� ..a;.. r.- "cr'y'il:.: �.r;_rs. �:'c'_��.s` .�sh'f; r: - y'> �vT`-:...• �:, r�-. i- +,r'..+.::: ^,..- r.:.,.C:C�'_ - ;:�.�'a5.••: e."'� ors -! =_ - {-- :eta:- .- }�_- r - ----- �. - ...'�i�',n:e�: =�:: -*�.:• - �; :.i.: »sr:;•�:.r^.-wi.. �L"�= jr,�.,�.,,�+,,..V. _ _�.�.,';,`,�`::>�:`: -,. ..i;,; - .."*,!sl., te: -v} �tc�',c..t�� ice,,. _.r�-.;t:�•.:y. _ _ 4 _ `':}. 7F�.F ..^�� _ ''.�� -td.. .�`.'' ._.ai' _ r`t-`',i:''° l'iY�,-•"�. -t.._G._= : -._:: -_r. ��_'_'�I.:;. ra+- �a�Y•.. _..._Jr�rd..�_a At 4.4 -7 17 cl( A .4 C- A.0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page i CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR- - - - - -- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE ------ PROGRAM - - - - -- -- - - - - -- OBJECT ---- - -P_O. i --- - - - - -- ----------------------------------- 136477 06/07/93 $1,570.00 - - - -- ------- ABC SEAMLESS OF HOPK NEW GUTTERS /DOWNSPOUT 052093 CDBG PROP PROF SERVICES < *> $1,570.00* 136478 06/07/93 $68.03 ABP MIDWEST LUNCH MEETING PLANNIN 538754 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN 7703 < *> $68.03* 136479 06/07/93 $476.45 ACTION MAILING SERVI MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E 3842 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET E < *> $476.45* 136480 06/07/93 $25.00 ADATH JESHURUN USY ADERTISING 1993 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER < *> $25.00* 136481 06/07/93 $195.71 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 08008102 ED BUILDING & ALARM SERVICE 06/07/93 $93.03 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 08008101 CENTENNIAL LAK ALARM SERVICE < *> $288.74* 136482 06/07/93 $88.01 ADVANCE LIGHTING INC REPAIR 45247 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7086 < *> $88.01* 136483 06/07/93 $192.00 ADVANCED STATE SECUR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12108 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES 6487 06/07/93 $1,024.23 ADVANCED STATE SECUR MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 12108 SWIM PROG MACH. & EQUIP < *> $1,216.23* 136484 06/07/93 $190.80 ADVANTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 917495 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL < *> $190.80* 136485 06/07/93 $10.00 AIRSIGNAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4926305 PW BUILDING CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $30.00 AIRSIGNAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4926305 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4926305 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4926305 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $135.28 AIRSIGNAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 4926305 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 4926305 FINANCE EQUIP RENTAL < *> $190.28* 136486 06/07/93 $610.09 ALBINSON SERVICE OZALID 216729 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 5107 < *> $610.09* 136487 06/07/93 $44.10 ALEXANDER, FIRMIN CLASS REFUND 051893 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION <*> $44.10* 136488 06/07/93 $137.20 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 17091 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING < *> $137.20* 136489 06/07/93 $615.00 ALSTAD, MARIAN AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> S615.00* 136490 06/07/93 $89.60 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 19949 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7422 06/07/93 $200.75 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 009413 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7211 06/07/93 $129.47 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CROSSOVER BOX FOR TRU 9436 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7211 06/07/93 $172.26 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REBUILT ALT 18377 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7724 < *> $592.08* 136491 06/07/93 $93.75 AMBERGATE GARDENS PLANTS 051393 CENTENNIAL LAK TREES FLWR SH 7520 < *> $93.75* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 2 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136492 06/07/93 $140.00 AMERICAN PLANNING AS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 050193 PLANNING DUES & SUBSCR < *> $140.00* 136493 06/07/93 $208.06 AMERICAN SERVICES CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 000821 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> 5208.06* 136494 06/07/93 $144.60 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 051593 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $144.60* 136495 06/07/93 $13.33 AMVETS CONVENTION YE ADVERTISING NA16806 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $13.33 AMVETS CONVENTION YE ADVERTISING NA16806 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $13.34 AMVETS CONVENTION YE ADVERTISING NA16806 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < ■> $40.00* 136496 06/07/93 $60.00 ANDERSON, CHERI PERFORM CL JUNE 5 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $60.00* 136497 06/07/93. $148.74 ANDERSON, ROSAMOND AMBULANCE FEES 052593 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $148.74* 136498 06/07/93 $443.39 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC WEED KILLER 9075 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 7389 < *> $443.39* 136499 06/07/93 $447.30 ANIXTER BROS INC UNDERGROUND 669 -0691 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 7465 < *> $447.30* 136500 06/07/93 $66.46 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING MATERIALS 36495 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7190 < *> $66.46* 136501 06/07/93 $35.95 ARTISTIC FLORAL MEMORIAL /J FISCHER 5411 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $35.95* 136502 06;07/93 $86.80 ASCAP DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 051193 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCR < *> $86.80* 136503 06/07/93 .$63.00 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD 60221 CENTENNIAL LAK CST OF GD FOO < *> $63.00* 136504 06/07/93 $25.00 ASSOCIATION OF METRO ANNUAL MEETING 052693 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN <*> $25.00* 136505 06/07/93 $63.17 ASTLEFORD INTL KIT A -97053 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7380 < *> $63.17* 136506 06/07/93 $12.95 AT &T CONSUMER PRODUC TELEPHONE 052593 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $14.62 AT &T CONSUMER PRODUC TELEPHONE 052593 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE < *> $27.57* 136507 .ti/07/93 $44.79 AT &T TELEPHONE 043093 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $17.65 AT &T TELEPHONE 050393 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> $62.44* 136508 06/07/93 $220.00 ATOM CONT EDUCATION 002722 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $220.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 3 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - ---- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION --------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - - - -- - -- OBJECT ---------------- P.O. # - - - - -- ----------------------------- 136509 06/07/93 $139.43 -- - - - -- AUSTIN HARDWARE HINGE 61567 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7328 < *> $139.43* 136510 06/07/93 $120.50 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C REPAIR WORK 18866 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7734 < *> $120.50* 136511 06/07/93 $701.15 AVR INC CONCRETE 84020 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 6913 06/07/93 $620.24 AVR INC CONCRETE 83913 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 6913 06/07/93 $636.03 AVR INC CONCRETE 84093 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 6913 06/07/93 $848.04 AVR INC CONCRETE 84794 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 06/07/93 $493.80 AVR INC CONCRETE 84467 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE < *> $3,299.26* 136512 06/07/93 $25.55 AXT, LYLE VENDING PRODUCT 052793 GUN RANGE CST OF GD F00 < *> $25.55* 136513 06/07/93 $129.70 B & S INDUSTRIES INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 77917 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTH 7243 < *> $129.70* 136514 06/07/93 $254.81 BACHMANS NURSERY WHO PLANTS 52476 PENDING TRANSF CIP 7348 06/07/93 $415.88 BACHMANS NURSERY WHO SOIL 52822 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 7489 06/07/93 $313.64 BACHMANS NURSERY WHO PLANTS 53219 PENDING TRANSF CIP 7532 < *> $984.33* 136515 06/07/93 $126.74 BAILEY NURSERIES TREES 24891 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 7043 06/07/93 $272.11 BAILEY NURSERIES PLANT TREES 20147 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 6030 06/07/93 $59.11 BAILEY NURSERIES TREES 19286 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 6030 < *> $457.96* 136516 06/07/93 $120.00 BAILEY, CHARLES AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES * * 136517 - 06/07/93 $65.00 BALDINGER, WENDY PERFORM CL 6/5/93 051393 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $65.00* 136518 06/07/93 $92.92 BANKSYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 013343 LIQUOR 50TH ST OFFICE SUPPLI < *> $92.92* 136519 06/07/93 $4,995.00 BARBER CONSTRUCTION PAVING CART PATH 051493 GC CIP CIP 7678 < *> $4,995.00* 136520 06/07/93 $1,042.63 BARR ENG PROF ENG SERVICES 18734 -18 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $1,042.63* 136521 06/07/93 $1,500.00 BARRY SIEWERT CREATI SERVICES /MN SPLASH 052493 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < *> $1,500.00* 136522 06/07/93 26 BATTERY & TIRE WAREH BRAKE SHOE 253754 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7567 $101..26* 136523 06/07/93 $6,280.81 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 029689 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACE 6101 < *> $6,280.81* 136524 06/07/93 $32.47 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 015271 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7691 06/07/93 $1,110.78 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 015294 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPL 7412 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AN e page 4 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - -- OBJECT P.O. i --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < *> $1,143.25* 136525 06/07/93 $170.00 BELL, BRUCE MENIER CONT SERV CL 6/20 051093 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $170.00* 136526 06/07/93 $18.20 BENN, BRADLEY '_EY ART WORK SOLD POTTERY CONFERENCE 060193 060193 ART CNTR PROG ART CENTER ADM SALES OTHER CONF & SCHOOL 06/07/93 $37.00 BENN, BI' < *> $55.20* 136527 06/07/93 $172.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 051593/5 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQ CST OF GD LIQ 06/07/93 $262.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY LIQUOR DELIVERY 051593/Y 051593/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 06/07/93 $234.50 < *> $668.50* 136529 06/07/93 $28.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 894965 900982 CITY HALL GENE FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL OFFICE SUPPLI 7588 7241 06/07/93 06/07/93 542.97 -$17.89 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES CM900982 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 $152.72 BERTELSON BROS. INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 901448 901537 CITY HALL FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACE OFFICE SUPPLI 7600 7241 06/07/93 $23.43 $54.53 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CM96165 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 06/07/93 - $28.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 902530 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $88.66 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 902530 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $48.56 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 902557 897806 POOL OPERATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 06/07/93 $138.02 $364.23 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. TONER GENERAL SUPPLIES 902596 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $50.04 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 903908 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLI 7606 06/07/93 $5.37 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 904638 904638 POLICE DEPT. G CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 06/07/93 $250.11 $238.68 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. 2 STAPLERS 904719 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $3.38 BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 904719 904646 POOL OPERATION CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 06/07/93 $36.16 $21.73 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. INC. POOL MANUAL COVERS 906243 POOL ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 $108.31 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 906433 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLI 7778 06/07/93 $28.97 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 907405 907405 FIRE DEPT. GEN PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 06/07/93 $9.40 $1.29 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 907405 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $20.74 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 907441 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL < *> $1,617.66* 136530 06/07/93 $339.19 BEST BUY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 5012 033 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7492 < *> $339.19* 136531 06/07/93 $59.69 BEST LOCK OF MPLS PARTS KEYS 39242 39319 CLUB HOUSE GOLF ADMINISTR REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPL 7917 7707 06/07/93 $9.74 BEST LOCK OF MPLS < *> $69.43* 136532 06/07/93 $271.83 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 052593 GENERAL TURF C SOD & DIRT 6919 < *> $271.83* 136533 06/07/97 $194.45 BLEVINS CONCESSION S PIZZA 4217181- POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GO FOO 6719 < *> $194.45* 136534 06/07/93 $1,991.55 BORDER STATES INDUST INDUST LOCATOR METROCLAMO /LOCATOR 05053 -56 05113 -59 EQUIPMENT REPL ST LIGHTING OR EQUIP REPLACE REPAIR PARTS 7224 7224 06/07/93 $249.21 BORDER STATES < *> $2,240.76* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 5 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136535 06/07/93 $26.76 BOYER TRUCKS CAP 219641X1 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7405 06/07/93 $112.36 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 221488 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7587 06/07/93 $65.39 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 222962 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7575 06/07/93 $88.09 BOYER TRUCKS SEAT /BELT 223207 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7727 < *> $292.60* 136536 06/07/93 $119.93 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SUPPLIES 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $72.62 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SUPPLIES 052193 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $80.76 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 $75.25 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE PRINTING 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 06/07/93 $10.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE DUES 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOL 06/07/93 $97.43 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE FOOD FOR RESALE 052193 GRILL CST OF GD FOO 06/07/93 $29.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE POSTAGE 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR POSTAGE 06/07/93 $35.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE LAUNDRY 052193 GRILL LAUNDRY 06/07/93 -$5.15 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OVER /UNDER 052193 GOLF PROG CASH OVER AND < *> $514.84* 136537 06/07/93 $144.84 BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLA SIGN 10246 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 7913 < *> $144.84* 136538 06/07/93 $310.12 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 282066 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPP 7458 < *> $310.12* 136539 06/07/93 $285.60 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 61081601 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 7392 < *> $285.60* 136540 06/07/93 $75.00 BROM, BECKY SERVICES CL JUNE 24 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 136541 06/07/93 $239.63 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUC POWER SUPPLY 10983 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 6288 06/07/93 $6,177.00 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUC TRAFFIC TESTER 11081 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIP MAINT 6302 < *> $6,416.63* 136542 06/07/93 $35.00 BRUMFIELD, ADRIANE AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* 136543 06/07/93 $360.00 BRYANT, BETSY AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $28.00 BRYANT, BETSY ART WORK SOLD 060193 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $388.00* 136544 06/07/93 $157.24 BSN SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8423200 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL 7456 < *> $157.24* 136545 06/07/93 $75.00 BUDAS, STEVE PERFORM CL 6/5/93 051393 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* , 136546 06/07/93 $57.63 BUIE, BARBARA MEETING EXPENSE 051493 CENTENNIAL LAK MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $59.70 BUIE, BARBARA MEETING EXPENSES 052993 CENTENNIAL LAK MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $16.82 BUIE. BARBARA OFFICE EXPENSES 052993 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLI 06/07/93 $3.49 BUIE, BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 052993 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL < *> $137.64* 136547 06/07/93 $65.08 BUILDERS SQUARE TOOLS 14450858 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 06/07/93 $34.51 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14450861 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL < *> $99.59* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AN page 0 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - -- OBJECT --------------- P.O. # - - -- ----------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------- 136548 06/07/93 $250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA LICENSES & PERMITS 051793 LIQUOR 50TH ST LIC & PERMITS 06/07/93 $250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA LICENSES & PERMITS 051793 LIQUOR YORK GE LIC & PERMITS 06/07/93 $250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA LICENSES & PERMITS 051793 VERNON LIQUOR LIC & PERMITS < *� $750.00" 136549 06/07/93 $169.34 BURGER BROTHERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES /ANIM 44473 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPL 7237 < *> $169.34* 136550 06/07/93 $108.00 BURNS, MARY REPLACE AC REFUND CHE 051793 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $108.00* 136551 06/07/93 $75.00 BURTIS, ROBERT SERVICES CL JUNE 19 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00" 136552 06/07/93 $2,130.00 BUSCH VIDEO PRODUCTI EDIT VIDEO /MN SPLASH 050193 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < *> $2,130.00* 136553 06/07/93 $146.14 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD 150143 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7668 < *> $146.14* 136554 06/07/93 $233.24 CADY COMMUNICATIONS PHONE SYSTEM 81102 GC CIP CIP 7096 06/07/93 $421.74 CADY COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONT 82414 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQU 06/07/93 $253.48 CADY COMMUNICATIONS PHONE PARTS 82424 GC CIP CIP 7544 < *> $908.46* 136555 06/07/93 $161.00 CALLAHAN, FRAN MAY MILEAGE 060193 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $161.00* 136556 06/07/93 $60.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE /LOGIS 060193 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $60.00* 136557 06/07/93 $255.23 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 57320 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 7687 06/07/93 $1,915.51 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 57358 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING < *> $2,170.74* 136558 06/07/93 $54.34 CARLSON STORE FIX CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 65528 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL 7344 < *> $54.34* 136559 06/07/93 $100.00 CARLSON, CRAIG PERFORM CL JUNE 20 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 136560 06/07/93 $60.00 CARMICHAEL- RODRIGUEZ AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $60.00* 136561 06/07/93 - $83.34 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 313547 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $8.33 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 315371 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7414 06/07/93 $88.63 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 315556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7383 06/07/93 $143.13 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 315904 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $156.75* 136562 06/07/93 $79.74 CDP COPY MACHINE RENTAL 01718029 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL < *> $79.74* 136563 06/07/93 $42.25 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052493 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $10.60 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052.493 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 7 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136563 06/07/93 $62.55 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052493 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $34.63 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052493 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $66.73 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 052493. PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $78.29 CELLULAR ONE CAR PHONE 052493/K ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCR 06/07/93 $966.61 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR AIRTIME 052493/P DARE EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $177.39 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052493/P POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/07/93 $170.79 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 052493/P POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL < *> $1,609.84* 136564 06/07/93 $355.60 CHEM CONCEPTS GREASE /CLEANER 0590 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 7453 < *> $355.60* 136565 06/07/93 $96.07 CHEM -CAL COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 21298 -42 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 7299 < *> $96.07* 136566 06/07/93 $503.00 CHILD'S PLAY PROCEEDS FROM /KINETIC 052693 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM I < *> $503.00* 136567 06/07/93 $16.15 CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECH CONT EDUCATION 33488 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $16.15* 136568 06/07/93 $25.52 CITY OF EDINA WATER & SEWER 050793 CENTENNIAL LAK SEWER & WATER 06/07/93 $9.35 CITY OF EDINA WATER 050793. BUILDING MAINT SEWER & WATER 06/07/93 $213.90 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050793. FIRE DEPT. GEN SEWER & WATER 06/07/93 $36.40. CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050793. BUILDING MAINT SEWER & WATER 06/07/93 $294.17 CITY OF EDINA WATER MAY 7 GC CIP CIP < *> $579.34* 136569 06/07/93 $30.00 CITY OF EDINA MEETING EXP 1250 COMMUNICATIONS MEETING EXPEN < *> $?O.CO* 136570 06/07/93 $13.50 CITY WIDE WINDOW SER WINDOW CLEANING 43281 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $13.50 CITY WIDE WINDOW SER WINDOW CLEANING 43279 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $13.50 CITY WIDE WINDOW SER WINDOW CLEANING 43280 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $40.50* 136571 06/07/93 $487.00 CLASSIC SPORTING ARM AMMO FOR GUN RANGE 1114 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 7509 < *> $487.00* 136572 06/07/93 $75.00 CLELAND, BRUCE SERVICES CL 6/12 051393 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 136573 06/07/93 $19.14 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN RIBBINS LQ 227710 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $47.89 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN 3M DC2120 DATA CART 227710 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $89.40 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN WINDOWS 3.1 227710 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $58.55 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN PAPER & DC TAPES 227710 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL < *> $214.98* 136574 06/07/93 $233.18 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUC MISC SUPP 761886 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 7424 < *> $233.18* 136575 06/07/93 $30.00 CONNOLLY, BOB SERVICES CL JUNE 6 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 136576 06/07/93 $47.84 CONSTR FASTENING SYS PARTS 18624 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 7430 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 8 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT----------- VFNDOR -- ------ - - - - -- - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE -------- PROGRAM - - - - - - - -- - -- OBJECT---- - -P_0_ # -- - - - - -- ----------------------------------------- ---------------------- <*> - - - - -- $47.84* 136577 06/07/93 $94.79 CONSTRUCTION MATERIA CLEANER /RELEASE AGREE 009725 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 7729 < *> $94.79* 136578 06/07/93 $885.57 CONVEYORS BELTING 0018261 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7219 06/07/93 $21.20 CONVEYORS BELT LACING 0018458 50TH ST OCCUPA REPAIR PARTS 7437 < *> $906.77* 136579 06/07/93 $30.00 COX, LESLIE REFUBD /SWIMMING 052793 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION < *> $30.00* 136580 06/07/93 $337 12 CREATIVE Pkvi-.fIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 70126 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL < *> $337.42* 136581 06/07/93 $213.00 CRITTER CONTROL BEAVER CONTROL 21308 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV 06/07/93 $213 -00 CRITTER CONTROL BEAVER CONTROL 21312 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV 06/07/93 $426.00 CRITTER CONTROL BEAVER CONTROL 21350 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOV < *> $852.00* 136582 06/07/93 $50.00 CROSS VIEW LUTHERAN REFUND /DEPOSIT 051993 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PRO < *> $50.00* 136583 06/07/93 $32.00 CSI- CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20724 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 5761 06/07/93 $40.00 CSI CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20723 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 5761 06/07/93 $175.00 CSI EQUIPMENT MAINT 21100 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 7385 < *> $247.00* 136584 06/07/93 $403.49 CURTIN MATHESON SCIE LAB SUPPLIES 1429204 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPL 7450 < *> $403.49* 136585 06/07/93 $19.40 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 58881 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7521 06/07/93 $67.47 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. FILTER 59011 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7597 < *> $86.87* 136586 06/07/93 $209.00 D. C. ANNIS SEWER PUMP TANK /ARNESON 963 BUILDINn MAINT PROF. SERVICES 7604 < *> $209.00* 136587 06/07/93 $75.00 DAMAIN, DEXTER SERVICES CL JUNE 19 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER (*> $75.00* 136588 06/07/93 $77.46 DANS REGISTER SERVIC CASH REGISTER REPAIR/ 051993 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *) $77.46* 136589 06/07/93 $30.36 DARNELL, EILEEN ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $30.36* 136590 06/07/93 $300.00 DATAMAP INC PROF SERVICES 5254 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 7688 < *> $300.00* 136591 06/07/93 $529.84 DAVIES WATER EQUIPME GENERAL SUPPLIES 36774 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7628 < *> $529.84* 136592 06/07/93 $40.00 DAVIS, IDA ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $40.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM :k page 9 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136593 06/07/93 $69.75 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01654 MAINT OF COORS REPAIR PARTS 7477 06/07/93 $281.18 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01655 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $129.95 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01670 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7426 06/07/93 $42.69 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 01683 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7611 06/07/93 $100.84 DAYSTARTER BATTERY 01686 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7629 < *> $624.41* 136594 06/07/93 $187.44 DE- SIGN ER SIGN 022449 OFF DUTY EMPLO GENERAL SUPPL 7222 < *> $187.44* 136595 06/07/93 $30.90 DEKO FACTORY SERVICE REPAIR WORK 57249 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7594 <*> $30.90* 136596 06/07/93 $157.23 DELEGARD TOOL CO. TOOLS 40402 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 7428 < *> $157.23* 136597 06/07/93 $3,392.20 DELTA DENTAL DENTAL PREMIUM 169049 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $3,392.20* 136598 06/07/93 $18.41 DEPENDABLE COURIER CARF DELIVERY 230332 FINANCE PRO SVC AUDIT 06/07/93 $8.18 DEPENDABLE COURIER CAFR DELIVERY 231561 FINANCE PRO SVC AUDIT < *> $26.59* 136599 06/07/93 $874.00 DICKER, TOBIE AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $994.00* DICKER, TOBIE PT MAINT ART CENTER 060193 ART CENTER BLD SALARIES TEMP < *> 136600 06/07/93 $88.55 DIESEL SERVICE CO CIRCUIT BREAKER DS1 -2100 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7305 <*> $88.55* 136601 06/07/93 $207.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $207.00* 136602 06/07/93 $5.81 DISPATCH COMM /MN FREQ KNOB 106237 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $283.94 DISPATCH COMM /MN MAINT CONTRACT 27235 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE < *> $289.75* 136603 06/07/93 $365.44 DON BETZEN GOLF CO GOLF PENCILS 1159 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL 7708 < *> 5365.44* 136604 06/07/93 $80.00 DORNSEIF, DAN COMPUTER CLASS 052193 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOL < *> $80.00* 136605 06/07/93 $3,288.90 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER TREATMENT SUPPL 00969474 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT S 6915 06/07/93 $993.67 DPC INDUSTRIES POOL CHEMICALS 00973767 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS <*> $4,282.57* 136606 06/07/93 E.J. WINTERS INC AIR TUBE FOR INDUCTOR 584 SEWER CLEANING GENERAL SUPPL 7431 $155.49* 136607 06/07/93 $389.91 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 90735 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $149.74 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 90749 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $134.33 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 93275 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $66.80 EAGLE WINE MIX 94467 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $88.01 EAGLE WINE MIX 95142 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 10 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 0 -----------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------------------- <•> $828.79" 136608 06/07/93 $312.58 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS & POSTS 123281 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 7306 06/07/93 $202.14 EARL F. ANDERSON PAINT 123498 PAVEMENI MARKI PAINT 7367 < +> $514.72" 136609 06/07/93 $162.49 ED KRAEMER & SONS IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 33951 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $191.48 ED KRAEMER & SONS IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 33950 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $278.43 ED KRAEMER & SONS IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 34125 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $279.54 ED KRAEMER & SONS IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 34125 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $565.80 ED KRAEMER & SONS IN FILL MATERIAL 34557 DISTRIBUTION FILL MATERIAL <�> $1,477.74" 136610 06/07/93 $60.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF 'GOODS SOLD MI 13208 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $27.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13256. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $119.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS MISC 15434 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $142.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 15337 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 06/07/93 $51.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS MIX 15338 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $38.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS MIX 15429 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $64.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS BEER 15325 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 06/07/93 - $240.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CREDIT 9009401 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI <�> $264.50" 136611 06/07/93 $137.50 EDINA ART FAIR CONCESSION AGREEMENT 052593 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRG < +> $137.50• 136612 06/07/93 $25.00 EDINA MODEL YACHT CL REIMBURSEMENT FOR PER 051993 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < +> $25.00" 136613 06/07/93 $15.70 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION PROGRAMS 050593 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRG 06/07/93 $264.00 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS REIMBURSEMFtIT /IMMUNIZ 052793 GENERAL FD PRO CNTY HEALTH A < +> $279.70" 136614.06/07/93 $120.00 EHALT, HEIDI AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < "> $120.00" 136615 06/07/93 $21.80 ELASKY, JEFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 051793 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPL < +> $21.80" 136616 06/07/93 $173.99 ELDREDGE, JOY H AMBULANCE REFUND 051493 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE <"> $173.99" 136617 06/07/93 $146.97 ELVIN SAFETY SAFETY EQUIPMENT 93191 -06 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 7441 < "> $146.97" 136618 06/07/93 $42.70 EMPIE, JOHN ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < "> $42.70" 136619 06/07/93 $110.00 EMPIREHOUSE INC REPAIRS 51101 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7517 < +> $110.00" 136620 06/07/93 $300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB_ GENERAL SUPPLIES JUNE 199 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPL <+> $300.00" - 136621 06/07/93 $54.60 ERNIE'S CATERING SER CONT EDUCATION 1298 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page it CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $54.60* 136622 06/07/93 $148.34 ETHEL BOYD OR LAVONA AMBULANCE FEES 051193 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE <*> $148.34* 136623 06/07/93 $30.00 EVANS, FRANK SERVICES CL JUNE 12 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 136624 06/07/93 $37.00 FARBER, DIANE AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $37.00* 136625 06/07/93 $40.19 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO ADVERTISING 09478 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 7848 < *> $40.19* 136626 06/07/93 $887.52 FEED RITE CONTROL REPAIR VACUUM REGULAT 13685 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $887.52* 136627 06/07/93 $39.91 FERRELLGAS CRAFT SUPPLIES 22062 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 7671 < *> $39.91* 136628 06/07/93 $388.00 FETN VIDEO TRAINING 145230 FIRE DEPT. GEN TRAINING AIDS 5770 < *> $388.00* 136629 06/07/93 $245.00 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI UTLEY PARK TENNIS COU 93 -00137 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 7360 06/07/93 $998.00 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI REPAIRS /HIGHLAND TENN 93 -00135 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 7411 < *> $1,243.00* 136630 06/07/93 $18.00 FOOTE, JOANNA MEETING EXPENSES 052093 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET E < *> $18.00* 136631 06/07/93 $1,795.16 FORTIS BENEFITS HOSPITALIZATION 052893 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *.> $1,795.16* 136632 06/07/93 $131.00 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 619260 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7681 06/07/93 $170.87 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 627110 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7851 < *> $301.87* 136633 06/07/93 $230.63 FRAME, SUSAN COST OF GOODS SOLD 051193 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 06/07/93 $384.00 FRAME, SUSAN AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $614.63* 136634 06/07/93 $6.39 FRED G ANDERSON INC PAINT 131276 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7051 < *> $6.39* 136635 06/07/93 $14.00 FUHRMAN, CHIP REFUND 053093 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDI < *> $14.00* 136636 06/07/93 $82.00 GADEN, MELANIE AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $82.00* 136637 06/07/93 $456.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> - $456.00* 136638 06/07/93 $38.00 GEM TAP SERVICE BEER LINES 043093 GRILL CST OF GO F00 < *> 838.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 12 CHECK4 DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - -- -- OBJECT ------------------ P.O. --------------------------------------------------- 136639.06/07/93 $228.98 GENERAL OFFICE PRODU OFFICE CHAIRS 338850 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 7706 < *> 5228.98* 136640 06/07/93 $240.00 GILLIS. LOUISE AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> 5240.00* 136641 06/07/93 $13.17 GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPLACEMENT KEYS 931050 GOLF CARS GENERAL SUPPL 7525 < *> $13.17* 136642 06/07/93 $4,218.25 GOLFCRAFT PURCHASES FOR PRO SHO 060193 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOL < *> $4,218.25* 136643 06/07/93 $542.25 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 3040221 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE < *> $542.25* 136644 06/07/93 $95.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE 0 GFOA ANNUAL DUES 0356553 FINANCE DUES & SUBSCR < *> $95.00* 136645 06/07/93 $192.00 GRAPP, JEAN AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $192.00* 136646 06/07/93 $73.91 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 104 -6694 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPL 7369 06/07/93 $67.52 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. TELEPHONE 500 -5748 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 7420 < *> $141.43* 136647 06/07/93 $78.55 GREER, PAT ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER. < *> $78.55* 136648 06/07/93 $265.00 GRENDAHL MECHANICAL GRILL CONNECTION 1323 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 7914 < *> $265.00* 136649 06/07/93 $1,740.00 GREUPNER, JOE GOLF LESSONS 060193 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOL < *> $1,740.00* 136650 06/07/93 $27.95 GRIDLEY, CATHY ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $27.95* 136651 06/07/93 $22.27 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. MLX 95661 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $22.27* 136652 06/07/93 $104.97 GS DIRECT CREDIT MEMO TAKEN TWI 052593 ENGINEERING OE GENERAL SUPPL < *> $104.97* 136653 06/07/93 $25.00 GUST, MARGARET VISUAL ARTS CL 6/10 AC INSTRUCTOR 050693, 060193 ED ADMINISTRAT ART CENTER ADM PRO SVC OTHER PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 06/07/93 $394.00 $103.00 GUST, MARGARET GUST, MARGARET CRAFT SUPPLIES 060193 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE < *> $522.00* 136654 06/07/93 $237.23 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 154793 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 7480 < *> $237.23* 136655 06/07/93 $60.00 HANLON, NORMA AC INSTRUCTOR CRAFT SUPPLIES 060193 060193 ART CENTER ADM ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES CRAFT SUPPLIE 06/07/93 06/07/93 $12.00 $57.16 HANLON, NORMA HANLON, NORMA ART WORK,SOLD 060193 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $129.16* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM %S page 13 CHECK* DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136656 06/07/93 $74.75 HANNA, JUNE ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <•> $74.75* 136657 06/07/93 $255.00 HANS ROSACKER CO PLANTS 7590 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SH 7781 < *> $255.00* 136658 06/07/93 $30.00 HAPPY FACES VISUAL ARTS 6/12 CL 050693 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 136659 06/07/93 $30.00 HAPPY FACES VISUAL ART 6/19 CL MAY 6 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 136660 06/07/93 $85.41 HAROLD CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 624441 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7560 < *> $85.41* 136661 06/07/93 $180.00 HEIM, HARRY AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $180.00* 136662 06/07/93 $690.51 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 051393 GRILL CST OF GD FOO c *> $690.51* 136663 06/07/93 $231.71 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER EQUIPMENT MAINT APRIL 19 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 06/07/93 $41.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER EQUIPMENT MAINT MAY 1993 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $272.71* 136664 06/07/93 $166.74 HIAWATHA REDDY RENTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 01 -06739 WATER TREATMEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $166.74* 136665 06/07/93 $399.38 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M LINE MARKING PAINT 26431 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POW 6443 < *> $399.38* 136666 06/07/93 $16.72 HOFFMAN, FRANCIS REIMBURSEMENT /RETIREM 052093 LIQUOR YORK GE CST OF GDS BE < *> $16.72* 136667 06/07/93 .$400.00 HOMER ENGDAHL TRUST AMBULANCE FEES 051993 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $400.00* 136668 06/07/93 $63.85 HOPKINS CAR CARE CEN INTERIOR CAR SHAMPOO 051393 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7581 < *> $63.85* 136669 06/07/93 $1,139.83 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO PRINTING 15350 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 7473 < *> $1,139.83* 136670 06/07/93 $891.00 HORWATH, TOM FORESTRY 051893 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $16.50 HORWATH, TOM TREE TRIMMING 060193 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $924.00 HORWATH, TOM CONTRACT FORESTRY 060193 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $101.36 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE 060193 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE < *> $1,932.86* 136671 06/07/93 $29.04 HOUSER, BEVERLY ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $29.04* 136672 06/07/93 $.HOWARD, DARCY REFUND TENNIS 051493 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION * $2500* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 14 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM-- - - - - -- OBJECT --------------- P.O. # - -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136673 06/07/93 $60.00 HWY 101 AUTO SALVAGE REPAIR PARTS 1488 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7365 < *> 560.00* 136674 06/07/93 $232.80 HYDRAULIC SERVICE ENGINE HYD REBUILT 34443 MAINT OF COURS CONTR REPAIRS 7710 <*> $232.80* 136675 06/07/93 $828.14 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER METER GENERAL SUPPLIES 5799 0005834 UTILITY PROG METER REPAIR INVENTORY WAT GENERAL SUPPL 5382 5382 06/07/93 5296.60 HYDRO SUPPLY CO < *> $1,124.74* 136676 06/07/93 $29.72 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP MISC POOL SUPPLIES 90436 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7371 < *> $29.72* 136677 06/07/93 $81.45 INTERIOR COMMUNICATI PHONE 3762 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 7793 <* >. $81.45* 136678 06/07/93 $175.00 INTERNATIONAL CONFER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 051493 INSPECTIONS DUES & SUBSCR < *> $175.00* 136679 06/07/93 $2.96 INTERSTATE DETROIT D ACCESSORIES 198387 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7399 < *> $2.96* 136680 06/07/93 $425.00 JAMES CONSTRUCTION C CABINET 052593 GC CIP CIP 7715 < *> $425.00* 136681 06/07/93 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F REPLACE CHECK FROM MA 1993 MAY RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 136682 06/07/93 $1.,100.80 JAMIESON AND ASSOCIA EVALUATION /SOUND SYST 93542 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES <*>. $1 , 100.8" 136683 06/07/93 $490.61 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING D2010 D2108 ART CENTER ADM ART CENTER ADM PRINTING PRINTING 7261 7263 06/07/93 06/07/93 $496.64 $149.63 JERRYS PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING POOL MANUAL D2362 POOL ADMIN PRINTING < *> $1,136.88* 136684 06/07/93 $252.00 JEUB, PATTI AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $252.00* 136685 06/07/93 $217.34 JIM HATCH SALES HATCH SALES TOOLS SAFETY VESTS 2475 2493 GENERAL MAINT PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS SAFETY EQUIPM 7397 6804 06/07/93 $472.80 JIM < *> $690.14* 136686 06/07/93 $7.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 410696 410605 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 06/07/93 $78.06 $57.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 439711 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $46.02 JOHNSON WINE CO. MISC MIX 467902 466862 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 06/07/93 $30.02 $39.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. MISC 467829 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $258.72* 136687 06/07/93 $50.00 JOHNSON NAOMI , CLASS REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 060193 060193 ART CNTR PROG ART CENTER BLD REGISTRATION GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 06/07/93 $31.87 $92.34 JOHNSON, NAOMI JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 060193 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE < *> $174.21* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 15 CHECKS DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. S ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136688 06/07/93 $76.09 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY FERILIZER 105990 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER 7557 k 136689 06/07/93 $13.44 JULIEN, DIANE REIMBURSE 12 TRIPS TO 052493 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $13.44* 136690 06/07/93 $18.50 JULIEN, DIANE PLATES 052593 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 06/07/93 $7.44 JULIEN, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 052593 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $20.04 JULIEN, DIANE SAFETY GLASSES 052593 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM < *> $45.98* 136691 06/07/93 $69.25 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 3488 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7065 < *> $69.25* 136.692 06/07/93 $4,145.51 KARSTEN MANUFACTURIN CLUBS /EQUIPMENT /PRO S 060193 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOL < *> $4,145.51* 136693 06/07/93 $42.50 KEHOE, TERRENCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 052593 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $42.50* 136695 06/07/93 $70.90 KNOX COMM CREDIT PANEL MOLD /LUMBER 053787 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7185 06/07/93 $6.88 KNOX COMM CREDIT SHELF CLIP 053872 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7196 06/07/93 $27.13 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 054207 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7212 06/07/93 $70.02 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 054898 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 7459 06/07/93 $80.35 KNOX.COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 055620 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 7468 06/07/93 $36.17 KNOX COMM CREDIT MISC BLDG MATERIALS 055829 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7429 06/07/93 $7.01 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 055936 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 7468 06/07/93 $48.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER /SHED AT BRAEMA 056186 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 7571 06/07/93 $160.74 KNOX COMM CREDIT BUILDING SUPPLIES 056286 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7578 06/07/93 $23.55 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 056265 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPL 7543 06/07/93 $226.14 KNOX COMM CREDIT MISC HARDWARE 056825 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7634 06/07/93 $55.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT CRAFT SUPPLIES 035949 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 7665 06/07/93 $71.09 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 057044 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 7646 06/07/93 $168.26 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 057205 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 7654 06/07/93 $135.20 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 057386 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 7618 06/07/93 $56.96 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 057507 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPL 7774 < *> $1,254.37* 136696 06/07/93 $310.00 KNUTSON, KAREN AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $310.00* 136697 06/07/93 $78.00 KOCHENASH, RICK AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES ( *> $78.00* 136698 06/07/93 $398.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 72458 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD F00 7777 < *> $398.00* 136699 06/07/93 $30.00 KRENTZ, PAT REFUND /SWIMMING LESSO 052193 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION < *> $30.00* 136700 06/07/93 $2,577.49 KUNDE CO INC OAK WILT CONTROL 051093 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $2.577.49* 136701 06/07/93 $30.00 KVASNICK, BARB VISUAL ART 6/19 CL 050693 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER '< *> $30.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AN page 16 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM-- - - - - -- OBJECT --------------- P.O. - -- -------------------------------------------------- 136702 06/07/93 $230.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 728 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 7597 06/07/93 $193.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2824 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 7582 06/07/93 $435.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC LAKE WEED TREATMENT 4158 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 7877 < *> $858.00* 136703 06/07/93 $59.36 LANCRETE, LAURA MILEAGE 052793 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE < *> $59.36* 136704 06/07/93 $500.00 LANCRETE, LAURA GENERAL SUPPLIES 051793 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL < *> $500.00* 136705 06/07/93 $425.89 LASER QUIPT EXTRA TONER CARTRIDGE 052493 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQU <*> $425.89* 136707 06/07/93 $443.89 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1939061 1939060 CENTENNIAL LAK BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 7106 7335 06/07/93 06/07/93 $431.07 $152.74 LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1942783 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPL ' 7191 06/07/93 $325.97 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS REPAIR PARTS 1942780 1942779 EQUIPMENT OPER ED BUILDING & TOOLS REPAIR PARTS 7193 7192 06/07/93 06/07/93 $96.54 $485.63 LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1942782 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 7191 06/07/93 $438.13 LAWSON PRODUCTS ROTARY FILE SET REPAIR PARTS 1942781 1946025 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES REPAIR PARTS 7197 7210 06/07/93 06/07/93 $475.42 $142.40 LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1947454 PARKING LOTS GENERAL SUPPL 7322 06/07/93 $138.19 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1947456 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7330 06/07/93 $468.99 $222.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS TAPS & DIES TERMINALS /SCREWS /SUPP 1947544 1954588 EQUIPMENT OPER STREET NAME SI TOOLS GENERAL SUPPL 7324 7564 06/07/93 -06/07/93 $358.66 LAWSON PRODUCTS SCREWS -TY RAPS 1954587 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPL 7563 06/07/93 $83.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS ELECTRICAL WING & PLASTIC NUTS 1954586 1954585 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPL 7465 7465 06/07/93 06/07/93 $421.03 $260.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS L!.': /SON PRODUCTS TY NET RAPS 1954584 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7444 <•> $4,946.18* 136708 06/07/93 $537.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 18549 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 7391 < *> $537.00* 136709 06/07/93 $25.00 LEMEL, BETSY REFUND TENNIS 051493 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION ( *> $25.00* 136710 06/07/93 $6.92 LIEN INFECTION CON CLEAN SUPPLIES 001768 GOLF DOME CLEANING SUPP 7713 ( *> $6.92* 136711 06/07/93 $180.00 LINDENSELSER LANDFIL RUBBISH REMOVAL 043093 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOV 7301 < *> .$180.00* 136712 06/07/93 $20.79 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 226823 COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $7.19 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 227104 PLANNING PHOTO SUPPLIE ( *) $27.98* 136713 06/07/93 $6,123.12 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING AR0493 AR0493 FINANCE ASSESSING DATA PROCESSI DATA PROCESSI - 06/07/93 06/07/93 $3,048.58 $1,605.49 LOGIS LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0493 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSI 06/07/93 $294.15 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0493 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSI 06/07/93 $458.51 LOGIS. DATA PROCESSING AR0493 LIQUOR YORK GE DATA PROCESSI 06/07/93 $294.14 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0493 VERNON LIQUOR DATA PROCESSI < *> $11,823:99* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 17 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136714 06/07/93 $1,063.14 LUND, RON AUCTIONEERS FEE 052493 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPE • < *> $1,063.14* 136715 06/07/93 $182.06 LUTZ, RICHARD M CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /RE 051193 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $182.06* 136716 06/07/93 $202.08 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 20374 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $281.76 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 20361 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $397.17 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 20398 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $443.68 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 20476 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $182.32 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 20546 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $438.71 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 20572 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $322.88 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 20748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $233.92 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 20735 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $403.84 M AMUNDSON MIX 20765 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $2,906.36* 136717 06/07/93 $15.00 M.G.I.A. DUES 052193 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR < *> $15.00* 136718 06/07/93 $103.09 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. WATER TANK GAUGE 33768 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7027 06/07/93 $66.81 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC: REPAIR PARTS 33976 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7586 06/07/93 $39.70 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. CABLE 34313 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7423 < *> $209.60* 136719 06/07/93 $225.00 MACKERMAN, DANNY AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $225.00* 136720 06/07/93 $47.00 MAKELA, BARB AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $47.00* 136721 06/07/93 $36.00 MCCABE, SHIRE CLASS REFUND 051893 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $36.00* 136722 06/07/93 $992.89 MCCAREN DESIGN PLANTS 8892 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SH 7178 06/07/93 $992.88 MCCAREN DESIGN PLANTS 9024 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SH 7698 06/07/93 $112.80 MCCAREN DESIGN SOIL 9036 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER 7619 < *> $2,098.57* 136723 06/07/93 $120.40 MCCARTHY, LOWELL MILEAGE 052793 WEED MOWING MILEAGE 06/07/93 $124.32 MCCARTHY, LOWELL MILEAGE 060193 WEED MOWING MILEAGE < *> $244.72* 136724 06/07/93 $327.50 MCDOWELL, MARGARET AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $327.50* 136725 06/07/93 $50.00 MCELROY, KIMBERLY SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 051893 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00* 136726 06/07/93 .$198.88 MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE 1594001 GRILL CST OF GD F00 5572 < *> $198.88* 136727 06/07/93 $7.93 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 050193/P EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 06/07/93 $293.29 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 050193/P PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 06/07/93 $436.20 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS. 050193/P DISTRIBUTION TOOLS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 18 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136727 06/07/93 $986.10 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY ACCESSOPIES 050193/P EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 06/07/93 $58.52 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 050193/P CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $3,027.59 MCGUIRE.AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 050193/P EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $4,809.63* 136728 06/07/93 $154.04 MCNEILUS STEEL ALUMINUM 0105068 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7403 < *> $154.04* 136729 06/07/93 $23,530.15 MED CENTER HEALTH PL HOSPITALIZATION PREM 1067831 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $23,530.15* 136730 06/07/93 $29,276.16 MEDIC" ''HOICE HOSP PREMIUM 19314510 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATI < *> $29,276.16* 136731 06/07/93 $313.85 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 33062 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7325 06/07/93 $265.71 MERIT SUPPLY LPS' 33069 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 7416 06/07/93 $488.65 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 33088 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 7374 06/07/93 $260.28 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 33151 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPP 7535 06/07/93 $268.80 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 33153 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL 7526 06/07/93 $260.92 MERIT SUPPLY DISPENSER /SPA BATH 33171 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPP 7561 06/07/93 $498.24 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 33216 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7635 06/07/93 $112.89 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 33217 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPP 7269 06/07/93 $249.21 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 33266 GRILL - CLEANING SUPP 1:92 06/07/93 $460.46 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 33267 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7189 06/07/93 $388.46 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 33273 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7840 < *> $3,567.47* 136732 06/07/93 $15.00 METHODIST HOSPITAL PROF SERVICES 241571 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $15.00* 136733 06/07/93 $290.00 METRO AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING /BUSDIR 3063 LIQUOR 50TH ST ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $300.00 METRO AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING /BUSDIR 3063 LIQUOR YORK GE ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $300.00 METRO.AREA PROMOTION ADVERTISING /BUSDIR 3063 VERNON LIQUOR ADVERT OTHER <*> $890.00* 136734 06/07/93 $35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES ABSTRACT TRACT SEARCH 367391 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES 7558 06/07/93 $35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES ABSTRACT TRACT SEARCH 369275 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES 7853 < *> $70.00* 136735 06/07/93 $225,940.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE METRO 50500693 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC MET < *> $225,940.00* 136736 06/07/93 $28.16 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 051593 VANVALKENBURG CST OF GD F00 06/07/93 $9.52 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 052293 GRILL CST OF OD F00 06/07/93 $28.16 METZ BAKING CO HOT DOG BUNS 052293/P VANVALKENBURG CST OF GO FOO <*> $65.84* 136737 06/07/93 $80.00 MGCSA ASSN DUES JUNE MAINT OF COURS DUES & SUBSCR 06/07/93 $80.00 MGCSA DUES JUNE MAINT OF COURS DUES & SUBSCR 06/07/93 $200.00 MGCSA SCHOOL 060193 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOL 7918 < *> $360.00* 136738 06/07/93 $81.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. PAINT 1080 DISTRIBUTION PAINT 06/07/93 $63.50 MIDWEST - ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1067 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $57.86 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1049 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 19 CHECKS DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. --------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136738 06/07/93 $213.27 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 9107 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 06/07/93 $1,260.36 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 9107 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 06/07/93 $378.18 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1109. DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL < *> $2,055.11* 136739 06/07/93 $575.00 MIDWEST AUDITING SER PRO SERVICES 041493 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $575.00* 136740 06/07/93 $43.58 MIDWEST MACHINERY IN REPAIR PARTS 18279 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7373 < *> $43.58* 136741 06/07/93 $91.53 MIDWEST SPORTS MKTG GENERAL SUPPLIES 110151 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 7676 < *> $91.53* 136742 06/07/93 $134.00 MIDWEST VENDING WHOL FOOD 052793 GRILL CST OF GO F00 < *> $134.00* 136743 06/07/93 $440.00 MILLERBERND •REPAIR PARTS 54146 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 6832 < *> $440.00* 136744 06/07/93 $374.97 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 747252 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPL 7451 < *> $374.97* 136745 06/07/93 $105.86 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC T SHANK BIT 25 -49 -24 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7194 < *> $105.86* 136746 06/07/93 $226.20 MINE SAFETY APPLIANC GENERAL SUPPLIES 05/20319 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 7617 < *> $226.20* 136747 06/07/93 512.24 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER CENTRAL 050193 GENERAL MAINT EQUIP RENTAL < *> $12.24* 136748 06/07/93 $748.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB CONTRACTED REPAIRS 030007 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 7527 06/07/93 $280.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB REPAIR STOP BOX 030018 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 7742 < *> 51,028.50* 136750 06/07/93 $294.96 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 06/07/93 $260.02 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, CITY HALL GENE HEAT 06/07/93 $1,803.68 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, PW BUILDING HEAT 06/07/93 $671.83 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, BUILDING MAINT HEAT 06/07/93 $98.84 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, ART CENTER BLD HEAT 06/07/93 $6.56 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, POOL OPERATION HEAT 06/07/93 $152.21 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, CLUB HOUSE HEAT 06/07/93 $46.11 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, MAINT OF COURS HEAT 06/07/93 $62.14 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, GOLF DOME HEAT 06/07/93 $1,520.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 06/07/93 $217.08 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, ED BUILDING & HEAT 06/07/93 $300.23 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 06/07/93 $2,298.42 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, DISTRIBUTION HEAT 06/07/93 $9.54 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 06/07/93 $17.70 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 06/07/93 $56.49 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 06/07/93 $118.44 MINNEGASCO HEAT JUNE 7, CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT < *> $7,935.23* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 20 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136751 06/07/93 $37.41 MINNESOTA CERAMIC SU COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 145959 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 6874 < *> $37.41* 136752 06/07/93 $28.84 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF GENERAL SUPPLIES 00073 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL <*> $28.84* 136753 06/07/93 $100.00 MINNESOTA CRAFTS COU AC ADVERTISING 060193 ART CENTER ADM AD" "'T OTHER < *> $100.00* 136754 06/07/93 $161.67 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MMBA DUES MAY 1993 LIQUOR 50TH ST PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $161.67 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MMBA DUES MAY 1993 LIQUOR YORK GE PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $161.66 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MMBA DUES MAY 1993 VERNON LIQUOR PROF SERVICES < *> $485.00* 136755 06/07/93 $232.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC SALE OF PROPERTY 051093 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPE 06/07/93 $59.76 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC ORD 1993 -8 9001 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING L < *> $291.76* 136756 06/07/93 $335.48 MINNESOTA TRUCKING A CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 004733 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOL 7404 < *> 5335.48* 136757 06/07/93 $405.00 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING 23749 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 6018 < *> $405.00* 136758 06/07/93 $90.00 MITCHELL, RAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 051793 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL < *> $90.00* 136759 06/07/93 $120.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE DUES 052193 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR < *> $120.00* 136760 06/07/93 $47.48 MN DEPT REVENUE PENALTY 022893 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $47.48* 136761 06/07/93 $77.94 MN. BEARING CO. CHEM KIT 115284 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 7580 < *> $77.94* 136762 06/07/93 $65.00 MN. ELEVATOR ELEVATOR SERVICE 050367 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU < *> $65.00* 136763 06/07/93 $197.62 MN. GLOVE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 79024 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 7425 06/07/93 $42.30 MN. GLOVE RAIN JACKET /PVC 79977 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 7425 < *> $239.92* 136764 06/07/93 $4.90 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 328921 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7357 06/07/93 $461.42 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 330187 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7357 06/07/93 $70.58 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 330173 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS .7507 06/07/93 $66.08 MN. TORO INC. BALL JOINTS 331385 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7446 06/07/93 $22.24 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 331957 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 7559 06/07/93 $103.20 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 332354 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7608 06/07/93 $55.69 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 332370 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 7614 < *> $784.11* 136765 06/07/93 $425.15 MN. WANNER GEAR /DRILL 18004 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 400.77 MN. WANNER REPAIR PARTS 18109 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 7630 < *> $485.92* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 21 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. ! -------------------------------------------------- ii - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 136766 06/07/93 $55.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNL. EQUIPMENT MAINT 178675 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 06/07/93 $120.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNL. EQUIPMENT MAINT 178965 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 7569 < *> S175.00* 136767 06/07/93 $5.62 MODEL STONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 2038797 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 2235 < *> $5.62* 136768 06/07/93 $9,294.08 MPLS FINANCE DEPARTM WATER PURCHASED 051593 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHAS < *> $9,294.08* 136769 06/07/93 $111.20 MPLS HEALTH DEPT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1274 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $111.20* 136770 06/07/93 $95.47 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 114272 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7351 < *> $95.47* 136771 06/07/93 $23.96 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR PARTS 4644 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7393 06/07/93 $53.50 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR WORK 4687 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7642 06/07/93 $479.36 MUNICILITE CO EMERGENCY LIGHTING 4697 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7723 < *> $556.82* 136772 06/07/93 $100.00 MUSICAL IMAGININGS SERVICES CL 6/7 051093 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 136773 06/07/93 $55.00 MUZAK SERVICE CONTRACT 060193/C CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQU 06/07/93 $43.00 MUZAK MUSIC ADVERTISING 060193/L VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $43.00 MUZAK MUSIC ADVERTISING 060193/L 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER < *> $141.00* 136774 06/07/93 $30.00 N.T.O.A. DUES 051993 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCR < *> $30.00* 136775 06/07/93 $418.80 NAME BRAND SPORTS EP UNIFORMS 6249 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 7690 06/07/93 $350.10 NAME BRAND SPORTS UNIFORMS CL 6248 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 7689 < *> $768.90* 136776 06/07/93 $19.14 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 894823 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7590 06/07/93 $25.52 NAPA AUTO PARTS OUT BOX 895746 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7728 06/07/93 $38.28 NAPA AUTO PARTS OUT BOX 895581 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7591 < *> $82.94* 136777 06/07/93 $421.01 NASCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 248509 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPL 7449 < *> $421.01* 136778 06/07/93 $20.62 NATIONAL CUSTOM ENTE GENERAL SUPPLIES 25304 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7375 < *> $20.62* 136779 06/07/93 $94.56 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CONCESSION PRODUCT 172328 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF OD F00 6718 06/07/93 $53.98 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CONTRACTED REPAIRS 172416 VANVALKENBURG CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $62.29 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 172360 VANVALKENBURG CST OF GD F00 06/07/93 $226.95 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CONCESSION PRODUCT 174358 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOO 06/07/93 $121.08 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD 174363 CENTENNIAL LAK CST OF GD F00 7928 < *> $558.86* 136780 06/07/93 $294.21 NEDOROSKI, DAN CARPET CLEANING 6033 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 22 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $294.21* 136781 06/07/93 $180.00 NELSON, J THOMAS AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 06/07/93 $19.50 NELSON, J THOMAS ART -WORK SOLD 060193 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $199.50* 136782 06/07/93 $191.06 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN SIGNS & POSTS 2003551 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 7316 < *> $191.06* 136783 06/07/93 $225.00 NICHOLAS LEGEROS INC AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $225.00* 136784 06/07/93 $301.75 NORTH SECOND STREET PIPE 048362 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 7645 <*> $301.75* 136785 06/07/93 $498:42 NORTH STAR TURF GRASS SEED 545660 FIELD MAINTENA SEED 7398 < *> $498.42* 136786 06/07/93 $102.22 NORTHERN AIRE TEST TABS 6600 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 7733 < *> $102.22* 136787 06/07/93 $43.79 NORTHERN AIRGAS 4 NITROUS OXIDE 19396 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 5500 <*> $43.79* - 136788 06/07/93 $70.23 NORTHERN REPAIR PARTS 620881B1 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7682 < *> $70.23* 136789 06/07/93 $181.71 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SU COST OF GOODS SOLD 206777 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7266 06/07/93 $24.48 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SU COST OF GOODS SOLD 207150 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7667 06/07/93 $99.03 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SU COST OF GOODS SOLD 207142 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7270 06/07/93 $143.40 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SU COST OF GOODS SOLD 207385 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7672 < *> $448.62* 136790 06/07/93 $202.84 NORTHWESTERN SERVICE REPAIRS' 31538 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7776 < *> $202.84* 136792 06/07/93 $123.50 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW -119 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI 06/07/93 $92.66 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -118 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $81.49 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -130 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $111.07 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -134 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $93.46 NORTHWESTERN TIRE.CO GENERAL SUPPLIES NW -149 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $287.96 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW -284 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI 06/07/93 $87.33 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -301 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $83.78 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO REPAIR PARTS NW -317 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $213.00 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES NW -304 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $166.89 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -482 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $98.47 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -501 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $182.22 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -525 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $222.93 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -617 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $783.46 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES NW -618 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7177 06/07/93 $364.44 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW -720 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI 06/07/93 $77.32 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -723 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 06/07/93 $212.79. NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW -722 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES <*> $3,282.77* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 23 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136793 06/07/93 $31.00 NOSEK, ANN REPLACE AC REFUND CHE 051793 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $31.00* 136794 06/07/93 $462.58 NOVAK'S GARAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4435 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7605 06/07/93 $409.85 NOVAK'S GARAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4436 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 6794 < *> $872.43* 136796 06/07/93 $7.40 NSP LIGHT & POWER 051293 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $648.65 NSP LIGHT & POWER 051293 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $69.35 NSP LIGHT & POWER 051293 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $269.85 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052693 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $24.19 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $22,198.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $3,133.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $3,059.53 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $236.03 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $1.29 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $2,804.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $1,486.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 06/07'/93 $28.43 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $1,615.16 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $2,294.61 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $4,372.92 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $2,876.02 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $264.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $161.53 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $5,541.37 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $1,681.01 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $20,076..15 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $7 09.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $1,183.72 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $524.97 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $578.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 06/07/93 $727.64 NSP LIGHT & POWER JUNE 7, CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER < *> $76,574.77* 136797 06/07/93 $384.00 ODLAND, DOROTHY AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $384.00* 136798 06/07/93 $85.19 OFFICE MAX INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 051393 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPL < *> $85.19* 136799 06/07/93 $352.52 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 31807 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 7272 < *> $352.52* 136800 06/07/93 $25.77 OLLMAN, DOROTHY ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $25.77* 136801 06/07/93 $39.90 OLWIN, ROGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 052893 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL <*> $39.90* 136802 06/07/93 $134.50 OPM INFORMATION SYST 2MB MEMORY VPT 198071 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 7607 < *> $134.50* 136803 06/07/93 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 4H79 ? ? ?? POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD F00 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 24 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136803 06/07/93 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 254942 GRILL CST OF GO F00 06/07/93 5171.50 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 255156 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GO F00 06/07/93 $37.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 4H8690 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOO < *> $362.50* 136804 06/07/93 $1,215.40 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONTRACT 73930 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQU <*> $1,215.40* 136805 06/07/93 $59.50 PANCAKE, CHAR ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $59.50* 136806 06/07/93 $89.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 051593 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $89.00* 136807 06/07/93 51,666.00 PARSONS ELECTRIC COM CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 123312B PARKS CIP 7697 06/07/93 $3,360.00 PARSONS ELECTRIC COM ALARM REVISIONS SR CT 123312A PARKS CIP 5993 < *> $5,026.00* 136808 06/07/93 $20.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 31542 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE 06/07/93 $46.00 PAUSTIS & SONS BEER 31997. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BE < *> $66.00* 136809 06/07/93 $30.00 PELINKA, DICK LICENSE RENEWAL /CLASS 052793 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $30.00* 136810 06/07/93 $290.75 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI APRIL /VE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $290.75* 136811 06/07/93 $2,000.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CO CREEK VALLEY SOCCER F 052493 GC CIP CIP 4232 < *> $2,000.00* 136812 06/07/93 $20.00 PETERSON, DAVID SERVICES EDINBOROUGH 052793 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $20.00* 136813 06/07/93 $25.74 PETT, BARBARA ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $25.74* 136815 06/07/93 $68.94 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /ADM 060193 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $20.00 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /FINANCE 060193 FINANCE DUES & SUBSCR 06/07/93 $2.75 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /FINANCE 060193 FINANCE MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $9.76 PETTY CASH MILEAGE /FINANCE 060193 FINANCE MILEAGE 06/07/93 $40.87 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /ASSESSING 060193 ASSESSING MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $28.00 PETTY CASH PARKING /ASSESSING 060193 ASSESSING MILEAGE 06/07/93 $9.54 PETTY CASH PHOTO PROCESSING /ASSE 060193 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $1.00 PETTY CASH PARKING /ENGINEERING 060193 ENGINEERING GE MILEAGE 06/07/93 $20.99 PETTY CASH PHOTO SUPPLIES /HEALTH 060193 PUBLIC HEALTH PHOTO SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $3.82 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /BUILDING 060193 INSPECTIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $3.75 PETTY CASH CONT ED /COMMUNICATION 060193 COMMUNICATIONS CONF & SCHOOL 06/07/93 $24.17 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /COMMUNICATION 060193 COMMUNICATIONS MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $24.99 PETTY CASH MTG EXP /COMMUNICATION 060193 COMMUNICATIONS MILEAGE 06/07/93 $0.23 PETTY CASH POSTAGE /FINANCE 060193 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE .06/07/93 $4.88 PFTTY CASH KITCHEN SUPPLIES /MAIN 060193 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $2.50 Pt'TY CASH PARKING /PARK & REC 060193 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 06/07/93 $9.71 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /ADAPTIVE REC 060193 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $8.19 PETTY CASH FILM DEV /ADAPTIVE REC 060193 SPECIAL ACTIVI PHOTO SUPPLIE COUNCIL.CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 25 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136815 06/07/93 $18.90 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /PARK & REC 060193 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $18.46 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /GUN RANGE 060193 GUN RANGE CST OF GD F00 06/07/93 $14.89 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /WATER DEPART 060193 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $336.34* 136816 06/07/93 $24.53 PFEIFFER, POLLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 052593 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPL < *> $24.53* 136817 06/07/93 $411.33 PHYSIO CONTROL FIRST AID SUPPLIES A69851 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 6555 < *> 5411.33* 136818 06/07/93 $2,574.91 PIONEER MIDWEST INC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 47290 -91 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7350 < *> $2,574.91* 136819 06/07/93 $.90 POMMER CO VOL RECEPTION 032307 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPL 7702 36 * 136820 06/07/93 $210.00 POSTMASTER MONTHLY NEWSLETTER MA 052793 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *) $210.00* 136821 06/07/93 $598.53 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO TOOLS 51093 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 6744 06/07/93 $175.72 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 51293 SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPL 7568 <*> $774.25* 136822 06/07/93 $79736 PRECISION LANDSCAPE STUMP REMOVAL 051493 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOV . * 136823 06/07/93 $384.47 PRECISION TURF /CHEM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 002725 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQU 7523 < *> $384.47* 136824 06/07/93 $40.00 PRICE, JENNIFER CLASS REFUND 051893 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $40.00* 136825 06/07/93 $27.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY SPECIAL ORDER 92819 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WIN 06/07/93 $21.78 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MIX 95146 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $49.18* 136826 06/07/93 $2,268.45 PRO PRINT & GRAPHICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4500 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7072 < *> $2,268.45* 136827 06/07/93 $145.00 QUALITY REFRIG MAINT REF 113751 GRILL SVC CONTR EQU < *> $145.00* 136828 06/07/93 $78.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 086886 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQ 06/07/93 $24.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 088368 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BE < *> $103.06* 136829 06/07/93 $99.43 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 56336 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7452 <*> $99.43* 136830 06/07/93 $15.92 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC HEAD PHONE 093196 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7598 < *> $15.92* 136831 06/07/93 $50.00 RAINS, DIANE PERFORM CL JUNE 12 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 26 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------- 136832 06/07/93 $441.06 - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REM SUPPLIES GLOVES /BUG KILLER 3105 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 7730 06/07/93 $122.27 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3110 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPL < *> 5563.33* 136833 06/07/93 $164.35 RICHFIELD PLUMBING C REPAIRS 9948 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 7714 < *> 5164.35* 136834 06/07/93 S4.25 RITZ CAMERA CAMERA LENS CLEANING SET GENERAL SUPPLIES 3758755 3758895 PUMP & LIFT ST ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 7448 7603 06/07/93 S21.28 RITZ < *> 525.53* 136835 06/07/93 546.50 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 38705 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 5499 < *> $46.50* 136836 06/07/93 55,439.00 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 913003 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 7584 06/07/93 51,251.13 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 13096 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 9379 < *> $6,690.13* 136837 06/07/93 519.15 ROSE BURNS CATERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1459 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPL < *> $19.15* 136838 06/07/93 $60.00 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE 052693 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $178.08 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE 052893 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPEN < *) $238.08* 136839 06/07/93 $240.00 RUDQUIST, MONICA AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES (*> $240.00* 136840 06/07/93 $153.35 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON SEAL 0072981 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7731 < *> $153 35* 136841 06/07/93 $70.69 S &S ARTS & CRAFTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1062694 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL 7457 < *> $70.69* 136842 06/07/93 $151.23 SAFETY KLEEN ► ",Z. WASTE DISPOSAL 910675 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI 06/07/93 $96.38 SAFETY KLEEN BASKET CLEANER M68494 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DI < *> $247.61* 136843 06/07/93 $110.17 SCHAFER EQUIP CO TOOLS 166349 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7213 < *) $110.17* 136844 06/07/93 $830.00 SCHLOSSER, KAY SHARK AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $830.00* 136845 06/07/93 $767.00 SCHMIDT, MICHAEL TARGETS FOR GUN RANGE 102475 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 7775 < *> S767.00* 136846 06/07/93 $59.00 SCHUMACHER. SANDRA CLASS REFUND 051893 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION < *> $59.00* 136841 06/07/93 $454.37 SCHUMANN'S BAKERY BREAD /ROLLS 052493 GRILL CST OF GD FOO < *> $454.37* e 136848 06/07/93 $75.00 SHASKIN, COLLEEN SERVICES CL JUNE 19 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> 575.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 27 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136849 06/07/93 $244.45 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SIGNS & POSTS 3284 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 7368 06/07/93 $247.70 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 4222 -9 .ARENA BLDG /GRO PAINT 7790 < *> $492.15* 136850006/07/93 $257.50 SIGN SERVICE INC AWNING CLEANING 00517708 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES 4536 06/07/93 $175.00 SIGN SERVICE INC AWNING CLEANING 00517708 VERNON OCCUPAN PROF SERVICES < *> $432.50* 136851 06/07/93 $24.72 SIITARI, MICHAEL CONT EDUCATION 051793 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $24.72* 136852 06/07/93 $1,198.13 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 32398825 GOLF ADMINISTR CST OF GD F00 6857 06/07/93 $1,198.13 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 32398825 GC CIP CIP 06/07/93 - $1,198.13 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 32398825 GOLF ADMINISTR CST OF GD F00 < *> $1,198.13* 136853 06/07/93 $85.00 SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING 9980 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 06/07/93 $290.00 SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING 24925 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < *> $375.00* 136854 06/07/93 $35.00 SOHNS, JOYCE A REIMBURSEMENT /SEMINAR 052493 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOL < *> $35.00* 136855 06/07/93 $90.53 SOKKIA MEASURING SYS SURVEY SUPPLIES 106183 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPL 5108 < *> $90.53* 136856 06/07/93 $52.00 SOUND PRODUCTS INC REPAIRS 11397 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 7919 < *> $52.00* 136857 06/07/93 $104.13 SOUTHCO INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 138193 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPL 7927 < *> $104.13* 136858 06/07/93 $385.00 SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS FLUSHING TAGS 2762 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7638 < *> S385.00* 136859 06/07/93 $650.00 SPECTRUM SAFETY LIFEGUARD SAFETY TRAI EPK100 -1 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $650.00* 136860 06/07/93 $65.90 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2031328 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7585 06/07/93 $16.41 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2038364 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 7592 06/07/93 $39.15 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2038363 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPL 7614 < *> $121.46* 136861 06/07/93 $3,566.00 STANDARD HEATING & A FURNACE /AC AIR CLEAN, 052593 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $3,566.00* 136862 06/07/93 $101.44 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 051993 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSON <*> $101.44* 136863 06/07/93 $315.00 STATE LAB OF HYGIENE STDS FOR CERTIFICATIO 28934 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICE < *> $315.00* 136864 06/07/93 $15.00 STATE TREASURER RENEWAL FEE /WASTE WAT 051993 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS 06/07/93 $15.00 STATE TREASURER CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 060193 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> 530.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 28 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # - - - - -- ---------------------------- 136865 06/07/93 $25.00 ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STEMPEL, MARJORIE REFUND TENNIS LESSON 060193 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION < *> $25.00* 136866 06/07/93 $130.73 STRETCHERS ACCESSORIF : 65509.1 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7304 06/07/93 $138.13 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 65857.1 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 7487 06/07/93 $343.87 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 65509.2 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 7304 < *> $612.73* 13686706/07/93 $36.85 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 185239 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $28.54 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 185297 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $324.09 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 158530 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $281.91 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10103 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $290.71 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 159073 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS. 06/07/93 $0.36 SUBURBAN 'IEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 185920 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $125.80 SUBURBAN •ilEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 186034 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $46.73 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HOSE 186191 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BRAKE REPAIRS 159636 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 06/07/93 $7.83 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BRACKETS 186344 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $40.02. SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CABLE 186417 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $1,282.84* 136868 06/07/93 $254.63 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 051793 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE <*> $254.63* 136869 06/07/93 $90.00 SULLIVAN, MONICA AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 136870 06/07/93 $70.82 SYMANTEC NORTIN UPGRADE 7.0 052493 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL < *> $70.82* 136871 06/07/93 $91.17 SYSTEMS SERVICE COMP METER CHARTS 7345 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPL 7809 < *> $91.17* 136872 06/07/93 $29.18 TAPE DIST OF MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 25777 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL < *> $29.18* 136873 06/07/93 $59.98 TARGET FIRST AID SUPPLIES 451426 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUP 6551 06/07/93 ¢59.60 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 450245 CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 1151.44 TARGET PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 451425 COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO SUPPLIE 06/07/93 - 5231.52 TARGET CREDIT 25350 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPL < *> $39.50* 136874 06/07/93 $156.04 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO ACCESSORIES 53379 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7318 06/07/93 $32.17 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS 0053802 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7318 < *> $188.21* 136875 06/07/93 $498.47 TERRY ANN SALES CO PLASTIC BAGS 1294 GRILL GENERAL SUPPL 7916 < *> $498.47* 136876 06/07/93 $341.87 TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 6999 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPL 7189 06/07/93 $29.30 TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 7000 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPL 7189 < *> $371.17* 136877 06/07/93 $230.00 THE GREAT MINNESOTA SEMINAR FESS 447 & A5 042393 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL 7247 < *> $230.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 29 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 136878 06/07/93 $510.05 THE HOWE COMPANY FERTILIZER 050493 CENTENNIAL LAK PAINT 7700 < *> $510.05* 136879 06/07/93 $2,008.63 THE PIRKL ASSOC. NEW 9 HOLE BRAEMAR 052893 GC CIP CIP < *> $2,008.63* 136880 06/07/93 $120.56 THE PRINT SHOP RECYCLING FLYERS 9436 RECYCLING PRINTING 7283 06/07/93 $483.00 THE PRINT SHOP MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 21481 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPL 7601 < *> $603.56* 136881 06/07/93 $31.31 THERMAL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 2065729 CIVIL DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPL 7372 < *> $31.31* 136882 06/07/93 $25.20 THOMPSON, BETTY ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $25.20* 136883 06/07/93 $14,588.01 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 74117 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < ■> $14,588.01* 136884 06/07/93 $9,412.45 THORPE DISTR. BEER MAY VERN VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BE 06/07/93 $130.85 THORPE DISTR. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MAY VERN VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MI < *> $9,543.30* 136885 06/07/93 $1,269.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING CONTRACTED PAINTING 051293 POOL OPERATION PAINT 7692 < *> $1,269.00* 136886 06/07/93 $130.90 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 462400 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPL 06/07/93 $55.08 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 221847 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPL 7579 06/07/93 $21.27 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 222743 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 7683 < *> $207.25* 136887 06/07/93 $1,837.13 TONKA WOODWORKS 1/2 PAYMENT -RACKS 040393 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP < *> $1,837.13* 136888 06/07/93 $274.77 TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 51074 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPL 7516 06/07/93 $74.56 TOOLS BY OLSEN REPAIR PARTS 51267. MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7524 < *> $349.33* 136889 06/07/93 $6,867.80 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTE 15% DOWNPAYMENT /CONTR 060193 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP < *> $6,867.80* 136890 06/07/93 $2,500.00 TRAFFIC INSTITUTE CONT EDUCATION 034028 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL < *> $2,500.00* 136891 06/07/93 $383.40 TRANSPORT WHITEGMC I ALARM 104693 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7649 < *> $383.40* 136892 06/07/93 $6.00 TRANSWORLD SYSTEM IN AMBULANCE FEES 052093 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEE < *> $6.00* 136893 06/07/93 $428.69- TRI- COUNTY DISTRIBUT COST OF GOODS SOLD 296890 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7265 06/07/93 $47.70 TRI - COUNTY DISTRIBUT COST OF GOODS SOLD 296900 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7265 06/07/93 $66.92 TRI - COUNTY DISTRIBUT COST OF GOODS SOLD 299330 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD F00 7666 < *> $543.31* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 30 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - - - -- - -- OBJECT --------------- P.-O. # - -- ------------------------------- 136894 06/07/93 $9.45 - - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------ TRIARCO A :.rs & CRAFT FRF!''HT /ART SUPPLIES 71377 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL 7409 06/07/93 $114.89 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CI ?:''.IS /PLAYGROUND 72243 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPL 7602 < *> $124.34* 136895 06/07/93 $34.13 TROPHY WORLD TROPHY 9978 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 7545 <*> $34.13* 136896 06/07/93 $47:25 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN -MT- CUIJfRACTED REPAIRS 12193 GENERAL TURF C CONTR REPAIRS < *> $47.25* 136897 06/07/93 $358.05 TURF SUPPLY WEED SPRAY 043050 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 7583 < *> $358.05* 136898 06/07/93 $329.94 TWIN CI7: ''OSE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 093338 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7311 <*> $329.94* - 136899 06/07/93 $185.75 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 404025 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPL < *> $185.75* 136900 06/07/93 $183.75 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 67SI 235 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 7221 06/07/93 $82.95 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 70SI 695 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7209 06/07/93 $120.89 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67SI 236 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 7333 06/07/93 $5.78 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 67SI 232 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPL 6905 06/07/93 $353.27 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67SI 236 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 7338 06/07/93 $36.16 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67DI 937 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6805 06/07/93 $255.84 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 67SI 238 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 7589 06/07/93 $127.93 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP L'' "" 67SI 239 CLUB HOUSL REPAIR PARTS 7675 < *> $1,166.57* 136901 06/07/93 $225.00 UNIVERSITY OF ST THO SEMINAR 060193 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOL < *> $225:00* 136902 06/07/93 $235.53 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE -050193/E ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE <*> $235.53* 136903 06/07/93 $388.29 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $60.07 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $188.58 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $349.59 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $168.94 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $668.35 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $608.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, POOL TRACK GRE TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $266.99 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $53.78 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELEPHONE JUNE 7, PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $733.30 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TEI.rr'IIONE JUNE 7, 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 06/07/93 $194.72 US WEST COMMUNICATIO TELL BONE JUNE 7, YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE < *> $3,680.61* 136904 06/07/93 $22.90 US WEST PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 052093 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 7888 <*> $22.90* 136905 06/07/93 $432.22 USAQUATICS STAINLESS STEEL BASKE 10033 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPL < *> $432.22* 136906 06/07/93 $84.60 VALLIERE, JOHN REPLACE CHECK # 12886 051793 GOLF ADMINISTR MEETING EXPEN COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 31 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (*> $84.60* 136907 06/07/93 $77.60 VAN 0 LITE INC 12V BOLTS 55873 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7225 ( *> $77.60* 136908 06/07/93 $495.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC INSTALL LITES 12521 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQU 7463 06/07/93 $322.06 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 0/S LITE MAINT 12522 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQU 7712 < *> $817.06* 136909 06/07/93 $26.07 VEITH, MICHELLE PRINTING 052793 SPECIAL ACTIVI PRINTING ( *> $26.07* 136910 06/07/93 $81.45 VETERAN ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MAINT 52812 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT ( *> $81.45* 136911 06/07/93 $75.00 VICE, GARY PERFORM CL 6/3/93 051393 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER ( *> $75.00* 136912 06/07/93 $364.23 VIKING SAFETY PRODUC SAFETY GLASSES 489656 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPM 7063 (*> $364.23* 136913 06/07/93 $40.50 VOILES, ANNA ART WORK SOLD 052593 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER ( *> $40.50* 136914 06/07/93 $194.53 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 223544 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 7386 06/07/93 $322.98 VOSS LIGHTING ELEC REPAIR 224242 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPL 7643 < *> $517.51* 136915 06/07/93 $84.41 W W GRAINGER TOOLS 498 -6204 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7388 06/07/93 - 327.20 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 498 -6208 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 06/07/93 $50.40 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 498 -6208 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7380 06/07/93 $175.53 W W GRAINGER TOOLS 498 -6204 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7388 06/07/93 $57.21 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6218 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPL 7388 06/07/93 $185.10 W W GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 498 -6218 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPL 7427 < *> $525.45* 136916 06/07/93 $100.00 WALBRIDGE, DAVID PERFORM CL JUNE 12 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER ( *> $100.00* 136917 06/07/93 $79.24 WALKER, MERWYN MILEAGE 060793 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $79.24* 136918 06/07/93 $141.10 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 051893 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOL 06/07/93 $30.57 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 051893 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $11.25 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 051893 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 06/07/93 $196.32 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 051893 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $21.79 WATERSTREET, JOAN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 051893 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $21.38 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 051893 RESERVE PROGRA MEETING EXPEN 06/07/93 $18.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 051893 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $6.02 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 051893 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPL < *> $446.43* 136919 06/07/93 $224.79 WEEKEND FREEDOM SERVICE CONTRACT 071273 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER < *> $224.79* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 32 CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM -------- OB3ECT------ P_0_- * ------ ------------------------------------ 136920 06/07/93 $90.00 - - -- --------------- WERT, CAPRICE -- CLEANING 016310 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 4394 06/07/93 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 016311 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES 4395 < *> $180.00* 136921 06/07/93 $334.98 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILL BIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 97733 97938 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPL GENERAL SUPPL 7208 7115 06/07/93 $367.56 WEST < *> $702.54* 136922 06/07/93 $471.29 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT VALVE SEAL /GASKET 38616 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7134 < *> $471.29* 136923 06/07/93 $313.84 WHEELER LUMBER TIMBERS 1220 -087 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 7609 < *> $313.84* 136924 06/07/93 $288.00 WICKER,.CYD AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $288.00* 136925 06/07/93 $470.00 WILLIAM B MONTAGUE C PRINTING 050593. GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING < *> - $470.00* 136926 06/07/93 $284.71 WILLIAMS STEEL WILLIAMS STEEL TOOLS CUTTING OIL 485274 -0 488405 -0 GENERAL MAINT EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS GENERAL SUPPL 7321 7596 06/07/93 $68.83 < *> $353.54* 136927 06/07/93 $35.00 WILLMAR SECTIONAL FI CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 032793 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOL < *> $35.00* 136928 06/07/93 $60.00 WINE SPECTATOR WINE SPECTATOR WINE SPECTATOR 042893 042893. LIQUOR 50TH ST VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCR CST OF GDS MI 06/07/93 $37.50 WINE-SPECTATOR < *> $97.50* 136929 06/07/93 $1,490.00 WIRING PLUS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 060193 GOLF ADMINISTR SAFETY EQUIPM 6858 < *> $1,490.00* 136930 06/07/93 $300.30 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY SALES TAX 83542 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPL < *> $300.30* 136931 06/07/93 $420.00 WITZEL TREE MOVING PLANT TREES PLANT TREES 2381 2380 TREES & MAINTE MAINT OF COURS PLANT & TREES PLANT & TREES 7790 7758 06/07/93 $480.00 WITZEL TREE MOVING < *> $900.00* 136932 06/07/93 $42.93 WOLD, MIKE REIMBURSE CHANGE FUND 052493 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPL < *> $42.93* 136933 06/07/93 $537.72 WRIGHT LINE POCKET FOLDERS /FILE S 052493 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $68.07 WRIGHT LINE FILE SUPPORTS /LEGAL & 052493 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPL < *> $605.79* 136934 06/07/93 $41.62 XEROX CORP CARF COVERS 14969216 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPL 7494 136935 06/07/93 - $123.97 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54187266 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPM 06/07/93 $24.65 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE. DRUGS . 54187357 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPL 06/07/93 $112.23 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54187262 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPM < *> 512.91* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 32 CHECK• DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 136936 06/07/93 $4.19 ZIEGLER INC ELEMENT 8C87514 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7378 06/07/93 $60.29 ZIEGLER INC REGULATOR /GASKET 8C92267 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7631 < *> 564.48* 136937 06/07/93 $40.00 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 060193 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE 06/07/93 $210.00 ZINN, BOBO AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $250.00* $637,510.45* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:52 AM page 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 - - - - -- - $211,529.74 FUND # 11 $5,206.00 FUND # 12 $754.59 FUND # 15 $673.24 FUND # 23 $12,819.07 FUND # 26 $6,848.70 FUND # 27 $40,930.29 FUND # 28 $9,421.53 FUND # 29 $1,298.01 FUND # 30 $30,057.81 FUND # 40 $279,572.57 FUND # 41 $1,095.32 FUND # 42 $120.56 FUND # 50 $31,572.27 FUND # 60 $5,610.95 $637,510.45"