HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-06-07_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 7, 1993
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such
items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of May 17, 1993
* II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
III. REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REBATE - Edina School District
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION - Timothy Eickhoff
EMPLOYEE COMMENDATION - Robert Lawson
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Special Council Meeting of April 27, 1993 and Regular
Council Meeting of May 17, 1993
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Final Rezoning - Planned Office District, POD -1 to Automobile Parking
District (APD) - 6400 France Avenue, BTO Development /Fairview Development
Corporation
B. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Planned Industrial District to
PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Plan Designation from Industrial to
Commercial - Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil Property (Contd from 5/17/93)
* C. Appeal of Zoning Board of Appeals Decision - Five Foot Setback Variance to
Allow Living Space Above Garage - 6312 Indian Hills Rd (Contd from 5/17/93)
III. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass.
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass.
A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -8 - To Address Use of Awnings, Canopies &
Marquees and to Change Number of Free Standing Signs in PCD District
B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -9 - To Lift Moratorium on Issuance of
Permits for Signs and Awnings by Repealing Section 461 of the City Code
Agenda
Edina City Council
June 7, 1993
Page Two
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
V. AWARD OF BIDS
* A.
Articulated Sidewalk Plow (Contd from 5/17/93)
* B.
Four -Wheel Drive Utility Tractor With Cab/Detachable Loader (Contd from
5/17/93)
* C.
Unleaded Gasoline - Braemar Golf Course Maintenance
* D.
4th of July Fireworks - Cornelia Park
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A.
Curb Cut Request - 5621 Wood Lane
B.
Country Club Interim Traffic Report
C.
Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges - Mark Dalquist Addition
D.
Report on Edina Senior Center
E.
Appointment - Community Health Services Advisory Committee
* F.
Approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement and Fire Education Display Agreement
* G.
Approval of 1993 Labor Agreement - Operating Engineers Local 49
* H.
Approval of 1993 Labor Agreement - IAFF Local 1275
* I.
Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date (6/21/93) - Post Lane Sanitary Sewer
VII. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter Regarding Dog Ordinance - Irving Cobb, 5817 Ewing Avenue South
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
I%. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
R. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
RI. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 06/03/93 Total: $637,510.45
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon June 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Mon July 5 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues July 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
Mon July 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HAY 17, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was
seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF HAY 3. 1993, APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner
Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Minutes of
May 3, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO BE RETAINED FOR GRANDVIEV AREA (50TH STREET. ARCADIA
AVENUE AND VERNON AVENUE) Executive Director Hughes recalled that on April 19,
1993, the Council granted Final Development Plan approval for the redevelopment
at 50th Street and Arcadia Avenue. At that time, BRA staff recommended that
staff be authorized to prepare estimates and solicit bids for boulevard shade
trees and public sidewalks on 50th Street and Arcadia Avenue. The HRA did not
accept the staff recommendation, preferring to delay authorization of the project
until the private property owners had completed the private landscape plans.
Staff believes that it is important that the landscape plans for the public
right -of -way and the private properties be coordinated at this time although
authorization could be delayed to a future date. Executive Director Hughes asked
that staff be authorized to retain a landscape architect for the purpose of
preparing a public right -of -way landscape plan for the 50th Street /Arcadia area
to be presented to the HRA for project authorization at a future date.
In response to Commissioner Smith as to estimated cost, Executive Director Hughes
said he believed this work would approximate $5,000. Commissioner Smith
commented that he hoped it would not go above that figure.
Commissioner Kelly made a motion authorizing staff to retain a landscape
architect to prepare landscape plans for right -of -way landscaping on 50th Street,
Arcadia Avenue, and Vernon Avenue. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by
Commissioner Kelly to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated May 12, 1993, and consisting of one page totalling
$6,566.84.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the
meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:52 AM
page 1
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12433
06/07/93
$22.28
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
NOTARY STAMP
900256
50TH STREET
MISC
< *>
$22.28"
12434
06/07/93
$2,501.00
BRW INC.
ENGINEER FEES
68136
GRANDVIEW
PRO FEE ARCH/
< *>
$2,501.00"
12435
06/07/93
$22.61
CELLULAR ONE
TELEPHONE
052493/H
GRANDVIEW
MISC
< *>
$22.61*
12436
06/07/93
$30.00
CHRISTY, DEANINE
REFUND PARKING PERMIT
PERMIT #
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
$30.00*
12437
06/07/93
$33.00
ESPING. STEPHANIE
REFUND PARKING PERMIT
PERMIT #
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
$33.00*
12438
06/07/93
$2,966.50
MASTER ELECTRIC CO I
RES AMENITIES
11529.
CENTENNIAL LAK
RESID IMPROVE
06/07/93
$4,198.00
MASTER ELECTRIC CO I
RES AMENITIES
10926
CENTENNIAL LAK
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$7,164.50*
12439
06/07/93
$14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SENIOR
HRA BOND PAYMENT
JUNE 199
EDINBOROUGH
LOAN TO 0TH F
< *>
$14,166.67"
$23,940.06*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, JUN 3, 1993, AM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND # 01 $23,940.06
$23,940.08"
4
=ew
o
�1. ( --
\ NRI.nM•'�
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: ,NNE 7, 1993
Subject:
EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT
REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX
INCREMENT REBATE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item w HRA III
Consent
Information Only jI
Mgr. Recommends I I To HRA
Rebate excess tax increments to the Edina School District from the Grandview Tax
Increment Financing District. Rebate amount for 1993 - $20,000.00.
Info /Background:
The Board of Education for the Edina Public Schools has adopted the attached
resolution which requests that the HRA rebate excess tax increments resulting from the
1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the requested rebate is $20,000.00. This
rebate would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District.
The HRA granted similar rebates to the School District in 1991 and in 1992. In 1991,
the School District used the rebated funds to recondition tennis courts at the
Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the cost of rehabilitating the
track at Kuhlman Field. For 1993, the School District proposes , to use the rebate to
improve handicap accessibility to the seating area in the Kuhlman Field stadium
complex, and to upgrade the press box facility. As an alternative, the rebate would be
applied to replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. The
School District points out that these facilities receive use by the residents of the City.
The requested rebate is for 1993 only. Future rebates will be considered on a year -by-
year basis.
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Rebate excess tax increments to the Edina School District from the Grandview Tax
Increment Financing District. Rebate amount for 1993 - $20,000.00.
Info /Background:
The Board of Education for the Edina Public Schools has adopted the attached
resolution which requests that the HRA rebate excess tax increments resulting from the
1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the requested rebate is $20,000.00. This
rebate would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District.
The HRA granted similar rebates to the School District in 1991 and in 1992. In 1991,
the School District used the rebated funds to recondition tennis courts at the
Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the cost of rehabilitating the
track at Kuhlman Field. For 1993, the School District proposes , to use the rebate to
improve handicap accessibility to the seating area in the Kuhlman Field stadium
complex, and to upgrade the press box facility. As an alternative, the rebate would be
applied to replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. The
School District points out that these facilities receive use by the residents of the City.
The requested rebate is for 1993 only. Future rebates will be considered on a year -by-
year basis.
WE CARE
WE DARE
WE SHARE
4 I
PUBLIC
SCHOOLS May 25, 1993
Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a resolution recently
approved by the Edina Board of Education. The resolution
requests that the Edina City Council consider a rebate of
the excess revenue that is generated for the city's Tax
Increment Finance (TIF) districts because of the 1988 excess
levy referendum.
You may recall that the Board of Education has made a
similar request each of the past two years that has been
approved by the Edina City Council.
Sincerely,
James A. Hamann
Assistant Superintendent
for Business Services
JAH /mef
Enc.
5701
NORMANDALE
ROAD
E D I N A
MINNESOTA
55424
/4
6 1 2- 9 2 0. 2 9 8 0 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
FOR ACTION
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, May 24, 1993
Volume 64, Report 425
SUBJECT: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE FROM THE 1988
REFERENDUM
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Request the Edina City Council to rebate excess
tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988
referendum for the fiscal year 1992 -93 only in an
amount of $20,000.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Edina contains four tax increment financing
districts, two of which (50th and France District and
Grandview District) are inclusive within the school
district. When these TIF districts were established the
base or first year valuation of the districts was captured
for taxing jurisdictions such as the school district or
county, which means that tax revenue for the school district
from the TIF districts remains fixed for a 20 to 25 year
period. Because the TIF districts do increase in value the
city is able to generate incremental tax revenue (difference
between the fixed amount and current or incremental
valuation). These incremental tax revenues are used to
retire the development bonds and other costs of. development.
When the voters of the school district authorized by
referendum an additional levy, the result of applying the
additional levy on the incremental or current value is the
generation of excess revenue to the development (TIF)
district. This phenomenon directs revenue to the TIF
district through no action on the part of the city instead
of producing revenue for the school district for whose
benefit the levy was created.
664
665
The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing
Act include a provision whereby a city with tax increment
financing districts may pay excess tax increment revenue
generated by a referendum levy to the school district
(clause 3 of Subdivision -10 added to M.S. 469.177). Payment
by a city to a school district of the excess tax increment
revenue must be approved by a majority vote of the city
governing body.
This request can be made annually hereafter and considered
by the Edina City Council on a year -to -year basis.
If this request is approved by the Edina City Council, the
funds would be applied to either the cost of renovation work
at the Kuhlman Field Stadium complex for improving
handicapped accessibility to the seating area and to upgrade
the press box facility, or to the cost of replacing the
playing surface in the field house at Edina High School.
These are facilities owned by the school district, but used
by residents throughout the community.
'j
City of Edina
April 12, 1993
Mr. Timothy Eickhoff
5312 Bernard Place
Edina. Minnesota 55436
Dear Mr. Eickhoff,
On be: -alf of the Edina Police Department, I wish to express our most sincere appreciation for the
assistance you provided on Tuesday, April 6, 1993, at the France Avenue bridge over the Crosstown
Highway.
Officer Ron Riegert has advised me that upon seeing a distraught middle -aged female on the bridge,
you stopped and immediately ran to her location. By the time you approached her she had climbed
the bridge rail and was leaning out over the passing traffic below. You calmly reassured her that all
the problems she had could be worked out and as you were a good listener, you wanted her to tell
you about her difficulties.
You asked a passing motorist to call the police on her mobile telephone and continued to encourage
the despondent lady until she agreed to step back over the railing. Numerous motorists passed by
during this period but you were the only person that stopped to assist. Several people asked later if
the lady they had passed on the bridge had actually jumped.
Upon arrival at the scene. Officer Riegert took custody of the woman who informed him she had
walked awav from a Mental Health Unit at a nearby hospital.
I want to thank you for your concern and assistance in this matter. Your intervention most likely
prevented the death of a distressed person and possible additional carnage on the roadway. It is
comforting to note that during a time when it is common to "look the other way and not get
involved," you had the courage to come forward. Please accept our deepest appreciation.
Sincerely,
Leonard Kleven d
Chief of Police
EDNA POLICE DEPART71%MNT
Edina Police Department Administration (612) 925 -2242
4801 NEST 50TH STREET FAX 1612) 92: -3032
EDINA. MINNESOTA 35 42; -1394 INVESTIGATIONS (612) 925 -22 ;0
F-k
Oi
. Q.
leas
1�
Proclamation
Of
Appreciation
The Mayor and City Council,
on Behalf of the Citizens of
the City of Edina, Minnesota,
Hereby Proclaim To All
Their Sincere Appreciation to
Timothy Eickhoff
on April 12, 1993
In Celebration and Recognition of
Extraordinary Judgement and Selfless Effort
While Acting to Preserve Life. `
l
MAYOR FREDERICK RICHARDS
a
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 27, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards.
BID AWARDED FOR $19.580,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS,
SERIES 1993A It was reported that three (3) sealed bids for the General
Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A of the City had been
received at the time and place designated in the Terms of Proposal approved by
resolution of the Council at the meeting held on April 5, 1993, and included in
the Official Statement circulated by the City's financial advisor on behalf of
the City. The bids received were as follows:
Interest
Bidder Rates
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, 4.25% 1997
INC. 4.408 1998 -99
DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 4.608 2000
MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 4.758 2001
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES 4.908 2002
INC. 5.008 2003
SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM 5.108 2004 -06
& COMPANY INCORPORATED
EDWARD D. JONES & COMPANY
Cronin & Company,
Incorporated
Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand
& Bigelow, Incorporated
Miller, Johnson & Kuehn,
Inc.
American National Bank
Saint Paul
Craig - Hallum, Incorporated
Peterson Financial
Corporation
John G. Kinnard & Company
Incorporated
Park Investment Corporation
Isaak Bond Investments, Inc.
CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 4.508 1997 -99
INCORPORATED 4.708 2000
KEMPER SECURITIES, INC. 4.808 2001
GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHENS & =4.908 2002
THOMPSON, INC. 5.008 2003
5.108 2004
5.208 2005
5.258 2006
LEHMAN BROTHERS
PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED
PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC.
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS
INCORPORATED
BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC.
ROBERT W. BAIRD & COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
4.158 1997
4.358 1998
4.558 1999
4.758 2000
4.908 2001
5.008 2002
5.108 2003 -04
5.208 2005
Net True
Interest Interest
Price* Cost Rate
$19,458,450.00 $8,475,330.63 5.0282%
$19,458.450.00 $8,588,618.75 5.09598
$19,458,450.00 $8,635,835.63 5.12148
FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL 5.30% 2006
MARKETS INC.
John Nuveen and Co. Inc.
Nike Securities
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
* Subsequent to bid opening, the issue size was reduced to $19,580,000, and the
purchase prices were reduced to reflect such reduction in principal amount.
Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $19,580,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX
INCREMENT. REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A; AWARDING THE SALE,
FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION THEREOF
AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
Issuer), as follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Sale.
1.01. Authorization. The Issuer has presently outstanding its General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A, initially dated as of August 1,
1986 (the 1986A Bonds), its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series
1986B, initially dated as of August 1, 1986 (the 1986B Bonds), its General
Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989, initially dated as of
November 1, 1989 (the 1989 Bonds) and its General Obligation Tax Increment
Bonds,.Series 1990A, initially dated as of March 1, 1990 (the 1990 Bonds) (the
1986A Bonds, the 1986B Bonds, the 1989 Bonds and the 1990 Bonds are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the Prior Bonds). This Council, by a resolution
adopted on April 5, 1993, authorized the sale of General Obligation Tax
Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (the Bonds), of the Issuer, the proceeds
of which would be used, together with any additional funds of the Issuer which
might be required, to refund in advance of maturity (i) the 1986A Bonds maturing
in the years 1996 through 2006 which aggregate $3,400,000 in principal amount,
(ii) the 1986B Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2003, which aggregate
$1,350,000 in principal amount, (iii) the 1989 Bonds maturing in the years 1997
through 2006, which aggregate $10,710,000 in principal amount and $355,000 of
the 1989 Bonds maturing on January 1, 1996, and (iv) the 1990 Bonds maturing in
the years 2002 through 2005 which aggregate $3,080,000 in principal amount (such
portion of the Prior Bonds to be refunded is hereinafter called the Refunded
Bonds). Said refunding constitutes a "crossover refunding" as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.17, subd. 13.
1.02. Sale of Bonds. The Issuer has retained Springsted Incorporated, as
independent financial advisors in connection with the sale of the Bonds.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2, paragraph (9),
the requirements as to public sale do not apply to the issuance of the Bonds.
Bids have been received in accordance with the Terms of Proposal approved by the
resolution adopted by this Council on April 5, 1993 authorizing the sale of the
Bonds, and the Council has publicly considered all sealed bids presented in
conformity with the Terms of Proposal. The most favorable of such bids is
ascertained to be that of FBS Investment Services, Inc., and associates, of
Minneapolis, Minnesota (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of
$19,384,200 plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and
payment,-on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
1.03 Award of Bonds. The sale of the Bonds is hereby awarded to the
Purchaser and the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed on behalf
of the Issuer to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds in accordance with
the terms of the bid. The good faith deposit of the Purchaser shall be retained
and deposited by the Issuer until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be
deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. The good faith checks of
other bidders shall be returned to them forthwith.
1.04. Savings. It is hereby determined that by issuance of the Bonds the
Issuer will realize a substantial interest rate reduction, a gross savings of
approximately $1,277,877.51 and a present value savings (using the yield on the
Bonds, computed in accordance with Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, as the discount factor) of approximately $944,442.97.
1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are
required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to
exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of
the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed,
it is now necessary for the Council to establish the form and terms of the
Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith.
Section 2. Bond Terms: Registration: Execution and Delivery.
2.01. Issuance of Bonds. The Bonds shall be originally dated May 1,
1993, as the date of original issue and shall be issued forthwith on or after
such date using a Global Book Entry System. One Global Certificate representing
the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year (the Global
Certificates) will be issued and fully registered as to principal and interest
in the name of,Kray & Co. as nominee of the Midwest Securities Trust Company
(the Depository), a Securities and Exchange Commission registered depository, an
Illinois trust company, a member of the Federal Reserve System and a "clearing
corporation" within the meaning of the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code.
2.02. Maturities• Interest Rates* Denominations and Payment. The Bonds
shall be in the'denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof,
of.single maturities, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts stated
below, and shall bear interest from date of original issue until paid or duly
called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such
years and amounts, as follows:
Year Amount Rate
1997 $1,635,000 4.25%
1998 1,625,000 4.40
1999 1,635,000 4.40
2000 1,610,000 4.60
2001 1,680,000 4.75
2002 2,415,000 4.90
2003 2,455,000 5.00
2004 2,230,000 5.10
2005 2,555,000 5.10
2006 1,740,000 5.10
The tax increments pledged and appropriated by Section 5 and amounts from the
escrow account established in Section 3 hereof are estimated to be sufficient to
pay when due the'principal of and interest on the Bonds.
2.03. Dates and Interest Payment Dates. The Bonds shall bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year (an Interest Payment Date),
commencing February 1, 1994, calculated on the basis of a 360 day year of twelve
30 day months. Interest on any Global Certificate shall be paid as provided in
the first paragraph thereof, and interest on any Non - Global Bond shall be paid
on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose
name the Bond is registered (the Holder) on the registration books of the Issuer
maintained by the Bond Registrar, and in each case at the address appearing
thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) calendar day preceding
such Interest Payment Date (the Regular Record Date). Any such interest not so
timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who. is the Holder thereof as
of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder
thereof at the close of business on a date (the Special Record Date) fixed by
the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted
interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by the Bond
Registrar to the Holders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record
Date.
2.04. Form of Bond. The Bonds shall be in the form of Global
Certificates unless and until Replacement Bonds are made available as provided
in Section 2.14, and otherwise shall be in the form of Non - Global Bonds. The
form of Bonds shall be substantially as set forth in Exhibit A for the Global
Certificates or as set forth in Exhibit B for the Non - Global Bonds, but may
contain such additional or different terms and provisions as to the form and
time of payment, record date, notices and other matters as are consistent with a
Supplemental Resolution.
2.05. Redemption. The Issuer may elect on February 1, 2002, and on any
date thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2003. Redemption
may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is
in part, the City shall determine the maturity of the Bonds to be redeemed and
the amount of such maturity to be redeemed. If a maturity is prepaid only in
part, prepayments will be in increments of $5,000 of principal. All such
prepayments shall be at a price of par plus.accrued interest.
The Bond Registrar shall call Bonds for redemption and payment as herein
provided upon receipt by the Bond Registrar at least forty -five (45) days prior
to the redemption date of a request of the Issuer, in written form if the Bond
Registrar is other than a Issuer officer, unless a shorter period of notice is
acceptable to the Bond Registrar. Such request shall specify the principal
amount of Bonds to be called for redemption, the redemption date and the
redemption price.
Published notice of redemption shall in each case be given in accordance
with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent (if
other than a Issuer officer) and to each affected Holder. If and when the
Issuer shall call any of the Bonds for redemption and payment prior to the
stated maturity thereof, the Bond Registrar shall give written notice in the
name of the Issuer of its intention to redeem and pay such Bonds at the office
of the Bond Registrar. Notice of redemption shall be given by first class mail,
postage prepaid, mailed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption
date, to each Holder of Bonds to be redeemed, at the address appearing in the
Bond Register; provided that if a Depository Letter Agreement (hereafter
defined) contains other or different requirements for delivery of such notice to
the Depository, then the provisions of the Depository Letter Agreement shall be
followed for that Holder. All notices of redemption shall state:
(a) The redemption date;
(b) The redemption price;
(c) If less than all outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed, the
identification (and, in the case of partial redemption, the
respective principal amounts) of the Bonds to be redeemed;
(d) the CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed;
(e) That on the redemption date, the redemption price will become due and
payable upon each such Bond, and that interest thereon shall cease to
accrue from and after said date; and
(f) The place where such Bonds are to be surrendered for payment of the
redemption price (which shall be the office of the Bond Registrar).
In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the
Issuer shall also give, or cause to be given notice of redemption of any Bond or
Bonds or portions thereof at least two (2) days prior to the mailing of any
notice of redemption to Holders of Bonds to all registered securities
depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations
of the character of the Bonds such depositories now being The Depository Trust
Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago,
Illinois; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and to one or more information services of national recognition
that disseminate redemption information, such as J.J. Kenney or Financial Card
Services; provided that any defect in or failure to give any notice of
redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the
proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof.
2.06. Bond Registrar. The Finance Director of the Issuer is appointed to
act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (the Bond
Registrar), and shall so act for all Bonds unless and until a successor Bond
Registrar is duly appointed. A successor Bond Registrar shall be an officer of
the Issuer, or a bank or trust company eligible for designation as bond
registrar pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bond Registrar shall
also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor paying agent is duly
appointed. Principal and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the Holders of
the Bonds in the manner set forth in the forms of Bond and Section 3.
2.07. Execution and Delivery. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of
the.Issuer by the signatures of its Mayor and Manager, each with the effect
noted on the forms of the Bonds; provided that any of such signatures may be
printed or photocopied facsimiles. In the event of disability or resignation or
other absence of any such officer, the Bonds may be signed by the manual or
facsimile signature of that officer who may act on behalf of such absent or
disabled officer. In case any such officer whose signature or facsimile of
whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before
the delivery of the Bonds, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be
valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained
in office until delivery.
The Bonds when so prepared and executed_. shall be delivered by the Finance
Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser
shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof.
2.08. Authentication: Date of Registration. No Bond shall be valid or
obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this
resolution unless a Certificate of Authentication on such Bond, substantially in
the form set forth on the form of Bond, shall have been duly executed by the
Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall authenticate the signatures of
officers of the Issuer on each Bond by execution of the Certificate of
Authentication on the Bond and by inserting as the date of registration in the
space provided the date on which the Bond is authenticated. For purposes of
delivering the original Bonds to the Purchaser, the Bond Registrar shall insert
as the date of registration the date of original issue. The Certificate of
Authentication so executed on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has
been authenticated-and delivered under this resolution.
2.09. Registration: Transfer: Exchange. The Issuer will cause to be kept
at the office of the Bond Registrar a bond register in which, subject to such
reasonable regulations as the Bond Registrar may prescribe, the Bond Registrar
shall provide for the registration of Bonds and the registration of transfers of
Bonds entitled to be registered or transferred as herein provided.
All Bonds surrendered upon any exchange or transfer provided for in this
Resolution shall be promptly cancelled by the Bond Registrar and thereafter
disposed of as directed by the Issuer.
All Bonds delivered in exchange for or upon transfer of Bonds shall be
valid general obligations of the Issuer evidencing the same debt, and entitled
to the same benefits under this Resolution, as the Bonds surrendered for such
exchange or transfer.
Every Bond presented or surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly
endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form
satisfactory to the Bond.Registrar, duly executed by the Holder thereof or the
Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing.
The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any
tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or
exchange of any Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost'
Bonds.
Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regulations of the Issuer
contained in any agreement with, or notice to, the Bond Registrar, including
regulations which permit the Bond Registrar to close its transfer books between
record dates and payment dates.
2.10. Rights Upon Transfer or Exchange. Each Bond delivered upon
transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the
rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried.by such
other Bond.
2.11. Holders* Treatment of Registered Owner: Consent of Holders.
(A) For the purposes of all actions, consents and other matters affecting
Holders of Bonds issued under this Resolution, as from time to time
supplemented, other than payments, redemptions, and purchases, the Issuer may
(but shall not be obligated to) treat as the Holder of a Bond the beneficial
owner of the Bond instead of the person in whose name the Bond is registered.
For that purpose, the Issuer may ascertain the identity of the beneficial owner
of the Bond by such means as the Bond Registrar in its sole discretion deems
appropriate, including but not limited to a certificate from the Depository or
other person in whose name the Bond is registered identifying such beneficial
owner.
(B) The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name any
Bond is registered as the owner of such Bond for the. purpose of receiving
payment of. principal of and premium, if any, and interest on, such.Bond and for
all other purposes whatsoever whether or not such Bond shall be overdue, and
neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the
contrary.
(C) Any consent, request, direction, approval, objection or other
instrument required by this Resolution, as supplemented, to be signed and
executed by the Holders may be in any number of ,concurrent writings of similar
tenor and must be signed or executed by such Holders in person or by agent
appointed in writing. Proof of the execution of any such consent, request,
direction, approval, objection or other instrument or of the writing appointing
any such agent and of the ownership of Bonds, if made in the following manner,
shall be sufficient for any of the purposes of this Resolution as supplemented,
and shall be conclusive in favor of the Issuer with regard to any action taken
by it under such request or other instrument, namely:
(1) The fact and date of the execution by any person of any such writing
may be proved by the certificate of any officer in any jurisdiction who by
law has power to take acknowledgments within such jurisdiction that the
person signing such writing acknowledged before him the execution thereof,
or by an affidavit of any witness to such execution.
(2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (A) above, the fact of the
ownership by any person of Bonds and the amounts and numbers of such
Bonds, and the date of the holding of the same, may be proved by reference
to the Bond Register.
2.12. Description of the Global Certificates and Global. Book -Entry
System. Upon their original issuance the Bonds will be issued in the form of a
single Global Certificate for each "maturity, deposited with the Depository by
the Purchaser and immobilized as provided in Section 2.14. No beneficial owners
of interests in the Bonds will receive certificates representing their
respective interests in the Bonds except as provided in Section 2.14. Except as
so provided, during the term of the Bonds, beneficial ownership (and subsequent
transfers of beneficial ownership) of interests in the Global Certificates will
be reflected by book entries made on the records of the Depository and its
Participants and other banks, brokers, and dealers participating in the National
System. The Depository's book entries of beneficial ownership interests are
authorized to be in integral increments of $5,000, despite the larger authorized
denominations of the Global Certificates. Payment of principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Global Certificates will be made to the Bond Registrar
as paying agent, and in turn by the Bond Registrar to the Depository or its
nominee as registered owner of the Global Certificates, and the Depository
according to the laws and rules governing it will receive and forward payments
on behalf of the beneficial owners of the Global Certificates.
2.13. Depository Letter Agreement. There has been submitted to this
Council a form of letter agreement between the Bond Registrar and the
Depository. Such letter agreement (the Depository Letter Agreement) is hereby
approved. The Bond Registrar, the Mayor and the Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to execute the Depository Letter Agreement in substantially the
form submitted, with only such variations therein as may be required to complete
the Depository Letter Agreement, or which are not, in the opinion of the Issuer
Attorney and bond counsel, materially adverse to the interests of the Issuer.
2.14. Immobilization of Global Certificates by the Depository: Successor
Depository and Replacement Bonds. Pursuant to the request of the Purchaser to
the Depository, immediately upon the original delivery of.the Bonds the
Purchaser will deposit the Global Certificates representing all of the Bonds
with the Depository. The Global Certificates shall be in typewritten form or
otherwise as acceptable to the Depository, shall be registered in the name of
the Depository,or its nominee and shall be held immobilized from circulation at
the offices of the Depository. The Depository or its nominee will be the sole
holder of record of the Global Certificates and no investor or other party
purchasing, selling or otherwise transferring ownership of interests in any Bond
is to receive, hold or deliver any Global Certificates so long as the Depository
holds the Global Certificates immobilized from circulation, except as provided
below in this Section.
Global Certificates evidencing the Bonds may not, after their original
delivery, be transferred or exchanged except:
(i) Upon exchange of a Global Certificate after a partial redemption, as
provided in Section 2.15,
(ii) To any successor of the Depository (or its nominee) or any
substitute depository (a "Substitute Depository ") designated pursuant to
clause (iii) of this subparagraph, provided that any successor of the
Depository or any Substitute Depository must be both a "clearing
corporation" as defined in the Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code,
Minnesota Statutes, Section 336.8 -102, and a qualified and registered
"clearing agency" as provided in Section 17A of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended,
(iii) To a Substitute Depository designated by and acceptable to the
Issuer upon (a) the determination by the Depository that the Bonds shall
no longer be eligible for its depository services or (b) a determination
by the Issuer that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its
functions, provided that any Substitute Depository must be qualified to
act as such, as provided in clause (ii) of this subparagraph, or
(iv) In the event that:
(a) the Depository shall resign or discontinue its services for the-,.Bonds
and the Issuer is unable to locate a Substitute Depository within two (2)
months following the resignation or discontinuance, or
(b) the Issuer determines in its sole discretion that (1) the
continuation of the book entry system described herein might adversely
affect the interests of the beneficial owners of the Bonds, or (2) that it
is in the best interest-of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they
obtain certificated Bonds,
in either of which events the Issuer shall notify Holders of its determination
and the Issuer, the Bond Registrar and the Depository shall cooperate in
providing certificates (the "Replacement Bonds ") to Holders and the
registration, transfer and exchange of such Bonds shall thereafter be conducted
as provided in Section 2.09 hereof.
In the event of a replacement of the Depository as may be authorized by
the second paragraph of this Section, the Bond Registrar upon presentation of
Global Certificates shall register their transfer to the substitute or successor
depository, and the substitute or successor depository shall be treated as the
Depository for all purposes and functions under this resolution. The Depository
Letter Agreement shall not apply to a Substitute Depository unless the Issuer
and the Substitute Depository so agree, and a similar agreement may be entered
into.
2.15. Redemption- Global Certificates. Upon a reduction in the aggregate
principal amount of a Global Certificate, the Holder may make a notation of such
redemption on the panel provided on the Global Certificate stating the amount so
redeemed, or may return the Global Certificate to the Bond Registrar in exchange
for a new Global Certificate authenticated by the Bond Registrar, in proper
principal amount. Such notation, if made by the Holder, shall be for reference
only, and may not be relied upon by any other person as being in any way
determinative of the principal amount of such Global Certificate outstanding,-
unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the panel.
For the purposes of giving notice in accordance with Section 2.05, the
"Holder" of Global Certificates shall be the Depository or its nominee.
2.16. Redemption- Non - Global Bonds. To effect a partial redemption of
Non - Global Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar prior to
giving notice of redemption shall assign to each Non - Global Bond having a common
maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of
such Non - Global Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such
method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers
as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such
Non - Global Bonds to be redeemed. The Non - Global Bonds to be redeemed shall be
the Non = Global Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided,
however, that only so much of the principal amount of each such Non - Global Bond
of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 of
principal amount for each number assigned to it and so selected.
If a Non - Global Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be
surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so
requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer
and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or his, her or its
attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary)
and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of such
Non - Global Bond, without service charge, a new Non - Global Bond or Bonds of the
same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any
authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such Holder, in
aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion
of the principal of the Bond so surrendered.
Section 3. Use of Proceeds and Escrow Account. The proceeds of the Bonds
in the amount of $19,387,043.50, and funds in the amount of $41,400 from Merrill
Lynch Capital Services, Inc. (the Provider), pursuant to a Forward Purchase
Agreement (the Forward Purchase Agreement), between the-Provider and American
National Bank and Trust Company, are irrevocably appropriated for the payment of
all of the interest to become due on the Bonds to and including August 1, 1995
and for payment of $424,644.17 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on
February 1, 1996, $79,278.75 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on August
1, 1996, and $79,278.75 of the interest to come due on the Bonds on February 1,
1997, and for the payment of the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds on the
following dates and amounts:
Principal Amount Paid or
Refunded Bonds Crossover Date Redeemed from Escrow Account
1986A Bonds February 1, 1996 $ 3,400,000
1986B Bonds February 1, 1996 1,350,000
1989 Bonds January 1, 1996 11,065,000
1990 Bonds February 1, 1997 3,080,000
The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed, simultaneously with the
delivery of the Bonds, to deposit the proceeds thereof, to the extent described
above, in escrow with American National Bank and Trust Company, in St. Paul,
Minnesota (the Escrow Agent), a banking institution whose deposits are insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and whose combined capital and
surplus is not less than $500,000, and shall invest the funds so deposited in
securities authorized for such purpose by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67,
subdivision 8, maturing on such dates and bearing interest at such rates as are
required to provide funds sufficient, with cash retained in the escrow account,
to make the above - described payments. The Mayor and Manager are hereby
authorized to enter into an Escrow Agreement with the Escrow Agent establishing
the terms and conditions for the escrow account in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.67, and to enter into a Purchase Instruction Agreement
with the Provider in consideration for the amounts payable by the Provider under
the Forward Purchase Agreement. Of the remaining proceeds of the Bonds,
$65,092.16 shall be applied to pay issuance expenses and $ -0- shall be
deposited in the Sinking Fund created pursuant to Section 4 hereof.
Section 4. General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund.
The Bonds shall be payable from a separate Series 1993A General Obligation Tax
Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund (the Sinking Fund) which shall be created
and maintained on the books of the Issuer as a separate debt redemption fund
until the Bonds, and all interest thereon, are fully paid. There shall be
credited to the Sinking Fund the following:
(a) Any amount initially deposited therein pursuant to Section 3
hereof.
(b) All receipts of principal and interest on the investments held
in the escrow account established in Section 3 which are to be applied to pay
interest on the Bonds as provided in Section 3.
(c) All taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be
received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on
the Bonds, including the tax increments herein pledged and appropriated pursuant
to Section 5 to the Sinking Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes
levied for the payment of the Bonds.
(d) Any other funds appropriated by the Council for-the payment of
the Bonds.
Section 5. Pledge of Tax Increment. Bonds maturing in the
following years and amounts are being issued by the City to refund the 1986A
Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2006 and the 1989 Bonds maturing in the
years 1997 through 2006 and $355,000 of the principal amount of the 1989 Bonds
maturing on January 1, 1996 (such portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds):
Year Amount
1997 $1,458,029
1998 1,428,029
1999 1,423,281
2000 1,398,281
2001 1,471,174
2002 1,484,572
2003 1,463,266
2004 1,435,,000
2005 1,730,000
2006 1,740,000
All of the interest to come due on the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds
to and including August 1, 1995, and $345,365.42 of the interest to come due on
February 1, 1996, shall be paid from amounts in the escrow account established
in Section 3.
Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts are being issued by the
City to refund the 1986B Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2003 (such
portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as the Grandview Redevelopment Area
Bonds):
Year Amount
1997 $176,971
1998 176,971
1999 191,719
2000 191,719
2001 193,826
2002 225,428
2003 231,734
All of the interest to come due on the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds to and
including February 1, 1996 shall be paid from amounts in the escrow account
established in Section 3 hereof.
Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts are being issued by the
City to refund the 1990 Bonds maturing in the years 2002 through 2005 (such
portion of the Bonds is herein referred to as the 50th and France Redevelopment
Area Bonds):
Year Amount
1998 $ 20,000
1999 20,000
2000 20,000
2001 15,000
2002 705,000
2003 760,000
2004 795,000
2005 825,000
All of the interest to come due on the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds
to and including February 1, 1997 shall be paid from amounts in the escrow
accounts established in Section 3 hereof.
To pay the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby
irrevocably pledges to the Sinking.Fund tax increments derived from the tax
increment financing districts of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina (the HRA), designated by Hennepin County as Nos. 1203 (Southeast Edina -
Centennial Lakes),,1201 (Southeast Edina- Edinborough) and 1200 (50th and France)
and tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district of the
Issuer designated by Hennepin County as No. 1204 (Southdale), which are either
paid to the Issuer (in the case of the tax increment financing district
established by the Issuer) or received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the
Bonds (in the case of the tax increment financing districts established by the
HRA). Such tax increments shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount
sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Area Bonds, other than interest on the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Area Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on
investments held in the escrow account established in Section 3, as provided in
Section 3 and this Section 5.
To pay the Grandview Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby
irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increment derived from the tax
increment financing district of the HRA designated by Hennepin County as No.
1202 (Grandview) which are received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the Bonds.
Such tax increment shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount
sufficient to pay all principal of and interest on the Grandview Area
Redevelopment Bonds, other than interest on the Grandview Redevelopment Area
Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on investments held in the
escrow account established in Section 3, as provided in Section 3 and this
Section 5..
To pay the 50th and France Redevelopment Area Bonds, the Issuer hereby
irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increment derived from the tax
increment financing district of the HRA designated by Hennepin County as No.
1200 (50th and France) which are received by the Issuer from the HRA to pay the
Bonds. Such tax increment shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount
sufficient to pay all principal of and interest on the 50th and France
Redevelopment Bonds, other than interest on the 50th and France Redevelopment
Area Bonds paid from receipts of principal and interest on investments held in
the escrow account established in Section 3 as provided in Section 3, and this
Section 5.
Tax increment derived from tax increment financing districts identified
above may only be applied to pay principal and interest on the portion of the
Bonds to which such tax increment is pledged and may not be applied to pay any
other portion of the Bonds.
Nothing herein shall preclude the Issuer or the HRA from hereafter making
further pledges and appropriations of the tax increments herein pledged for the
payment of the Bonds for the payment of other obligations of the Issuer or HRA.
Section 6. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of
the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become
due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the Issuer shall be
and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It'is, however, presently estimated that
the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 5 hereof will provide sums not less
than 58 in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore
no tax levy is presently required.
Section 7. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as
provided in this-section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by
this resolution to the registered owners of the Bonds shall cease. The Issuer
may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any
date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient
for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it
may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient
for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the
date of such deposit. The Issue: may also discharge its obligations with
respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are
prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or
before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption
premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has
been duly given as provided herein. The Issuer may also at any time discharge
its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now
or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably
in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose,
cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing
interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the
holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal,
interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said
redemption date.
Section 8. Registration of Bonds. The Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of
Hennepin County and obtain a certificate that the Bonds have been duly entered
upon the Auditor's bond register as required by law.
Section 9. Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the Issuer and
County Auditor of Hennepin County -are hereby authorized and directed to prepare
and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified
copies of all proceedings and records relating to the Bonds and such other
affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts
relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from
the books and records in their custody and control or as otherwise known to
them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any
heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the Issuer as to the
correctness of all statements contained therein.
Section 10. Tax Covenant. The Issuer covenants and agrees with the
holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or.permit to be
taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause
the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all
actions within its powers to ensure that the interest.on the Bonds will not
become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. The Issuer will
cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting
statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code.
The Mayor and Manager, being the officers of the Issuer charged with the
responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized
and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance
with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14
and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances
in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it
reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner
that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code
and Regulations.
Section 11. Arbitrage Rebate. The Issuer acknowledges that the Bonds are
subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The Issuer
covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such
reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under
said Section 148(f) and applicable Treasury-Regulations to preserve the
exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax
purposes. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Finance Director is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Rebate Certificate setting forth the
undertakings of the Issuer to comply with the foregoing requirements, and the
Issuer hereby covenants and agrees to observe and perform the covenants and
agreements contained therein, unless amended or terminated in accordance with
the provisions thereof.
Section 12. No Designation of Qualified Tax - Exempt Obligations. The
Bonds shall not be designated as "qualified-tax-exempt obligations" for purposes
of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code.
Section 13. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this
resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the
invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not
affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution.
Section 14. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for
convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or
define the meaning of any provision hereof.
Section 15. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the
Bonds, dated April 13, 1993, prepared and delivered on behalf of the Issuer by
Springsted Incorporated, is hereby approved, and the officers of the Issuer are
hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be
appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency thereof.
Springsted Incorporated, is hereby authorized on behalf of the Issuer to prepare
and distribute to the Purchaser and a supplement to the Official Statement
listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery
date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required
to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Within seven business days from the date hereof, the Issuer shall deliver to the
'Purchaser 500 copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The
officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such notes as
may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the
Official Statement.
Section 16. Redemption of Prior Bonds. The Issuer hereby calls the
following portions of the Prior Bonds for redemption and prepayment on the
following dates:
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Kelly and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Mayor Richards
Nays: None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Maturities
Refunded Bonds
Redemption Date
to be
Redeemed
1986A Bonds
February 1, 1996
1996
- 2006
1986B Bonds
February 1, 1996
1996
- 2003
1989 Bonds
January 1, 1996
1997
- 2006
1990 Bonds
February 1, 1997
2002
- 2005
The Finance Director shall cause
notice of the redemption of such Prior Bonds to
be given in the manner required
by the resolutions
authorizing
the Prior Bonds.
Adopted this 27th day
of April, 1993.
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Kelly and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Mayor Richards
Nays: None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
R-
EXHIBIT A
(FORM OF GLOBAL CERTIFICATE]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND,
INTEREST MATURITY DATE OF
RATE DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE
May 1, 1993
REGISTERED OWNER:
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:
SERIES 1993A
CUSIP
THE CITY OF EDINA, County of Hennepin,•State of Minnesota (the "Issuer "),
certifies that it is indebted and for value received.promises to pay to the
registered owner specified above or on the certificate of registration attached
hereto, or registered assigns, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the
principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, unless
called for earlier redemption, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on
February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date "),
commencing February 1, 1994, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated
on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months) until the principal sum
is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most .
recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest
has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of and
premium, if any, on this Bond are payable by wire transfer (or other agreed
means of payment), in next day funds or its equivalent, on each payment date no
later than 12:00 noon (Chicago, Illinois time) upon presentation and surrender
hereof at the office of the Finance Director, City of Edina, in Edina, Minnesota
(the "Bond Registrar "), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent
duly appointed by the Issuer; provided, however, that upon a partial redemption
of this Bond which results in the stated amount hereof being reduced, the�Holder
may in its discretion be paid without presentation of this Bond, and may make a
notation on the panel provided herein of such redemption, stating the amount so
redeemed, or may return the Bond to the Bond Registrar in exchange for a new
Bond in the proper principal amount. Such notation, if made by the Holder,
shall be for reference only, and may not be relied upon by any other person as
being in any way determinative of the principal amount of this Bond outstanding,
unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the panel.
Interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date (by 12:00 noon,
Chicago, Illinois time) by wire transfer (or other agreed means of payment) in
next day funds or its equivalent to the person in whose name this Bond is
registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder ") on the registration books of the
Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at
the close of business on the fifteenth calendar day preceding such Interest
Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date "). Any interest not so timely paid shall
cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular
Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof at the
close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date ") fixed by the Bond
Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted
interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not
less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and
premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the
United States of America.
This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be
entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall
have been executed by the Bond Registrar.
Date of Payment Not Business Day. If the date for payment of the
principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be a Saturday,
Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the City of New
York, New York, or the city where the principal office of the Bond Registrar is
located are authorized by law or executive order to close, then the date for
such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday,
legal holiday or a day on which such banking institutions are authorized to
close, and payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made
on the nominal date of payment.
Redemption. All Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2003, are subject
to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2002,
and on any date thereafter, at a price of their principal amount plus accrued
interest.
Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment.
If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the maturity of the Bonds to
be redeemed; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are
called for prepayment, Bonds shall be prepaid in $5,000 increments of principal.
Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the
designated redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and
after the redemption date.
Notice of Redemption. Published notice of redemption shall in each case
be given in accordance with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given
to the paying agent (if other than an officer of the Issuer) and to each
affected Holder of the Bonds. For this purpose, the Depository (hereafter
identified, or any successor thereto) shall be the "Holder" as to Bonds
registered in the name of the Depository or its nominee. In the event any of
the Bonds are called for redemption, written notice thereof will be given by
first class mail mailed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption
date to each Holder of Bonds to be redeemed. In connection with any such
notice, the "CUSIP" numbers assigned to the Bonds shall be used.
Replacement or Notation of Bonds after Partial Redemption. Upon a partial
redemption of this Bond which results in the stated amount hereof being reduced,
the Holder may in its discretion make a notation on the panel provided herein of
such redemption, stating the amount so redeemed. Such notation, if made by the
Holder, shall be for reference only, and may not be relied upon by any other
person as being in any way determinative of the principal amount of the Bond
outstanding, unless the Bond Registrar has signed the appropriate column of the
panel. Otherwise, the Holder may surrender this Bond to the Bond Registrar
(with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of
transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by
the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the
Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate
and deliver to the Holder of such Bond, without service charge, a new Bond of
the same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of the
authorized denomination in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange
for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered.
Issuance: Purpose. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal
amount of $19,580,000, all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as
to number, maturity, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination, which
Bond has been issued.pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution
and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.178 and Chapter 475, and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City
Council on April 27, 1993 (the "Resolution "), to refund certain outstanding
general obligation tax increment bonds of the Issuer. The Bonds are payable
primarily from tax increments from tax increment financing districts established
by the Issuer or the-Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina which have
been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for
the full and prompt payment of the principal,of and interest on the Bonds as the
same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the Issuer have been
and are irrevocably pledged.
Denominations* Exchanee: Resolution. The Bonds are issuable originally
only as Global Certificates in the denomination of the entire principal amount
of the series maturing on a single date. Global Certificates are not
exchangeable for fully registered bonds of smaller denominations except in the
event of a partial redemption as above provided or in exchange for Replacement
Bonds if then available. Replacement Bonds, if made available as provided
below, are issuable solely as fully registered bonds in the denominations of
$5,000 and integral multiples thereof of a.single maturity and are exchangeable
for fully registered Bonds of other authorized denominations in equal aggregate
principal amounts at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the
manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is
hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the
Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of
the Bond Registrar.
Replacement Bonds. Replacement Bonds may be issued by the Issuer:
(a) If Midwest Securities Trust Company (the "Depository ") shall resign
or discontinue its services for the Bonds, and only if the Issuer is
unable to locate a substitute depository within two (2) months following
the resignation or discontinuance, or
(b) upon a determination by the Issuer in its sole discretion that (1)
the continuation of the book -entry system described in the Resolution
might adversely affect the interests of the beneficial owners of the
Bonds, or (2) that it is in the best interest of the beneficial owners of
the Bonds that they obtain certificated Bonds.
Transfer. This Bond shall be registered in the name of the payee on the
books of the Issuer by presenting this Bond for registration to the Bond
Registrar, who will endorse his, her or its name and note the date of
registration opposite the name of the payee in the certificate of registration
attached hereto. Thereafter this Bond may be transferred by delivery with an
assignment duly executed by the Holder or the Holder's legal representatives,
and the Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the Holder as the person exclusively
entitled to exercise all the rights and powers of an owner until this Bond is
presented with such assignment for registration of transfer, accompanied by
assurance of the nature provided by law that the assignment is genuine and
effective, and until such transfer is registered on said books and noted hereon
by the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the,
Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any
agreement with, or notice to, the Bond Registrar.
Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in
connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual
costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds.
Treatment of Registered Owner. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat
the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the
purpose of receiving payment as herein provided and for all other purposes,
whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond
Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary.
Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any
purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication
hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar.
Not Oualified Tax - Exempt Obligations. The Bonds have not been designated
by the Issuer as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purposes of Section
265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts,- conditions and things.
.required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to
happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, in
order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the Issuer according
to its terms, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular
and due form, time and manner as required by law; that prior to the issuance
hereof, the Issuer has pledged and appropriated tax increments to a sinking fund
established for the payment of the Bonds; that if necessary for the payment of
the Bonds ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property of the
Issuer, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this
Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the Issuer to exceed any constitutional
or statutory limitation of indebtedness.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its City Council has
caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the signatures of the Mayor and
City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth
below.
Date of Registration:
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager
BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within.
FINANCE DIRECTOR,
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Bond Registrar
BY
CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
The transfer of ownership of the principal amount of the attached Bond may be
made only by the registered owner or the owner's legal representative last noted
below.
DATE OF SIGNATURE OF
REGISTRATION REGISTERED OWNER BOND REGISTRAR
REGISTER OF PARTIAL PAYMENTS
The principal amount of the attached Bond has been prepaid on the dates and in
the amounts noted below:
Signature of Signature of
Date Amount Bondholder Bond Registrar
If a notation is made on this register, such notation has the effect stated in
the attached Bond. Partial payments do not require the presentation of the
attached Bond to the Bond Registrar, and a Holder could fail to note the partial
payment here.
ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship
and not as tenants in common
UTMA - as custodian for
(Cust) (Minor)
under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
ASSIGNMENT
For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and
transfers unto
the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof,
power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Signature Guaranteed:
attorney to
with full
Notice: The assignor's signature to this
assignment must correspond with the name as
it appears upon the face of the within Bond
in every particular, without alteration or
any change whatever. Signature(s) must be
guaranteed by a national bank or trust
company or by a brokerage firm having a
membership in one of the major stock
exchanges.
Please insert social security or other
identifying number of assignee:
R-
EXHIBIT B
[Form of Non - Global Bond]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF EDINA
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 1993A
INTEREST MATURITY DATE OF
RATE DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE CUSIP
May 1, 1993
REGISTERED OWNER:
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:
THE CITY OF EDINA, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (the
"Issuer "), certifies that it is indebted and for value received promises to pay
to the registered owner specified above or registered assigns, in the manner
hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity
date specified above, unless called for earlier redemption, and to pay interest
thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest
Payment Date "), commencing February 1, 1994, at the rate per annum specified
above (calculated on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months) until
the principal sun is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear
interest from the most recent. Interest Payment Date to which interest has been
paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof.
The principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond are payable upon presentation
and surrender hereof at the office of the Finance Director, City of Edina, in
Edina, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar"), acting as paying agent, or any
successor paying agent duly appointed by the Issuer. Interest on this Bond will
be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in
whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder ") on the
registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the
address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth calendar day
preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date "). Any interest
not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder
hereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is
the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the Special Record Date ")
fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the
defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to
Bondholders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. The
principal of and premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in
lawful money of the United States of America.
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS BOND SET FORTH
ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, WHICH PROVISIONS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME
EFFECT AS IF SET FORTH HERE.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things
required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to
happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in
order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the Issuer according
to its terms, -have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular
and due form, time and manner as required by law; that in and by the Resolution,
the Issuer has covenanted and agreed with the registered owners that the Bonds
are payable from a separate debt redemption fund of the Issuer; that prior to
the issuance hereof, the Issuer has pledged and appropriated tax increments to a
sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that if necessary for the
payment of the Bonds ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property
of the Issuer, without limitation as'to rate or amount; and that the issuance of
this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the Issuer to exceed any
constitutional or statutory limitation of ,indebtedness.
N
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its City
Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile
signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as
of the date set forth below.
Date of Registration:
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager
BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned
within.
FINANCE DIRECTOR,
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Bond Registrar
By
(ON REVERSE OF BOND)
Date of Payment Not Business Day. If the date for payment of the
principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be a Saturday,
Sunday, legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the City of New
York, New York, or the city where the principal office of the Bond Registrar is
located are authorized by law or executive order to close, then the date for
such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday,
legal holiday or a day on which such banking institutions are authorized to
close, and payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made
on the nominal date of payment.
Redemption. All Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2003, are subject
to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2002,
and on any date thereafter, at a price of their principal amount plus accrued
interest.
Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment.
If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the maturity of Bonds to be
redeemed; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called
for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the
Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due
and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue
from and after the redemption date.
Notice of Redemption. Published notice of redemption shall in each. case
be given.in accordance with law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given
to the paying agent (if other than an officer of the Issuer) and to each
affected Holder of the Bonds. In the event any of the Bonds are called for
redemption, written notice thereof will be given by first class mail mailed not
less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date to each Holder of Bonds
to be redeemed. In connection with any such notice, the "CUSIP" numbers
assigned to the Bonds shall be used.
Selection-of Bonds for Redemption. To effect a partial redemption of
Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each
Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the
principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot,
using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from
the numbers assigned to the Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each
number, shall equal the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The
Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so
selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of such
Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal
$5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be
redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if
the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in
form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder
thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer
shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and
deliver to the Holder of such Bond, without service charge, ,a new Bond or Bonds
of the same series having the same 'stated maturity and interest rate and of any
authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such Holder, in
aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion
of the principal of the Bond so surrendered.
Issuance: Purpose. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal
amount of $19,580,000 all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to
number, maturity, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination, which
Bond has been issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution
and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.178 and Chapter 475 and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council
of the Issuer on April 27, 1993 (the "Resolution "), to refund - certain
outstanding general obligation tax increment bonds of the Issuer. The Bonds are,,%
payable primarily from tax increments from tax increment financing districts
established by the Issuer or the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina
which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In
addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal of and interest on
the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the
Issuer have been and are irrevocably pledged.
Denominations: Exchange: Resolution. The Bonds are issuable solely as
fully registered bonds in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples
thereof of a single maturity and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of
other authorized denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the
principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to
the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the
Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar.
Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of the Bond
Registrar.
Transfer. This Bond is transferable by the Holder in person or by the
Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal office of the Bond
_Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, all
subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Resolution and to reasonable
regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar.
Thereupon the Issuer shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and
deliver, in exchange for this Bond, one or more new fully registered Bonds in
the name of the transferee (but not registered in blank or to "bearer" or
similar designation), of an authorized denomination or denominations, in
aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of this Bond, of the
same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate.
Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in
connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual
costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds.
Treatment of Registered Owner. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat
the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the
purpose of receiving payment as herein provided and for all other purposes,
whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond
Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary.
Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any
purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication
•. hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar.
Not Oualified Tax- Exemvt Obligations. The Bonds have not been designated
by the Issuer as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section
265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according
to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by -ae entireties
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship
and not as tenants in common
UTMA - as custodian for
under the
(Cust) (Minor)
Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
ASSIGNMENT
For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers
unto the within
Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
attorney to
transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full
power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Notice: The assignor's signature to this
assignment must correspond with the name as
it appears upon the face of the within Bond
in every particular, without alteration or
any change whatever. Signature(s) must be
guaranteed by a national bank or trust
company or by a brokerage firm having a
membership in one of the major stock
exchanges.
Signature Guaranteed:
Please insert social security or other
identifying number of assignee:
ADJOIIRPIII+.AT Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Rice and carried
unanimously for adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 P.M.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 17, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made,by Member Paulus and was seconded
by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
ARBOR DAY PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following proclamation which
was unanimously adopted:
ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION
APRIL 30, 1993
WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of
Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and
WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of
more than a million trees in Nebraska, and
WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and,the world, and
WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve
our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for
wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and
WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our
trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering
greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and
WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and
public places; and
WHEREAS, Edina has been recognized for the past six years as a Tree City USA by
The National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue the planting of trees
for its future,
WHEREAS, through a cooperative effort with the Edina School District, Cornelia
PTA, and the Edina Park and Recreation Department, Cornelia Elementary has
implemented an educational program called, "Cornelia Continues to Grow",
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota ReLeaf
Community Forest Program has granted $6,000 to "Cornelia Continues to Grow" for
planting of trees for the purpose of enhancing the community, benefiting the
environment and providing educational experiences for the residents of the City
of Edina,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim
April 30th, 1993, to be Arbor Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted
citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future
generations.
Dated this 30th day of April, 1993.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - BOB BURNETT Mayor Richards read the following
resolution of appreciation which was unanimously adopted:
. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Bob Burnett has served Edina School District No. 273 and the Edina
community as Principal since 1968; and
WHEREAS, he has been in education for 37 years, three years as Principal of
Highlands Elementary and 15 years as Principal of Cornelia Elementary; and
WHEREAS, beginning in 1956, Bob spent eight years at Concord Elementary teaching
fifth grade; and
WHEREAS, in 1966, he was in charge of the academic -abled program at both Cahill
C
Elementary and Cornelia Elementary; and
WHEREAS, Bob Burnett has been a moving force in the implementation of a site -
based managed school, cooperative learning and the option of a school within a
school to house both the Neighborhood and Continuous Progress Programs at
Highlands; and
WHEREAS, through his outstanding leadership and sincere dedication in promoting
the Edina Public Schools, Bob has demonstrated total commitment to the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council, the City staff and
the residents of Edina hereby express their thanks and appreciation to
BOB BURNETT
for his dedicated service in helping make the City of Edina an outstanding
community in which to learn, work and live.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Friday, June 4, 1993, be declared BOB BURNETT DAY.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1993.
*MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 3. 1993, APPROVED Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Council Minutes of the
regular meeting of May 3, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*HEARING ON REZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO JUNE 7. 1993
FOR PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND PLAN
DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL - LEWIS ENGINEERING/KUNZ OIL PROPERTY
Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the
hearing to'June 7, 1993; for rezoning to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and
Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Lewis EngineeringAunz Oil Property.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
APPEAL OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION CONTINUED TO JUNE 7. 1993 FOR FIVE
FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW LIVING SPACE ABOVE GARAGE AT 6312 INDIAN HILLS
ROAD Mayor Richards informed Council that directly before the meeting began
Gretchen Holland, 6312 Indian Hills Road, asked that her appeal of the decision
made by the Zoning Board of Appeals be continued to the Council meeting of
June 7, 1993.
Daniel Dunn, 6400 Indian Hills Road, stated that he lived on the adjacent
property and was opposed to the variance. He voiced disapproval with the
request for continuance because he felt it not fair and very inconvenient.
Member Kelly made a motion to continue the hearing to June 7, 1993, on the appeal
of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision regarding a five foot setback variance to
allow living space above the garage at 6312 Indian Hills Road. Motion was
seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
DAVID HETLAND OF REPRESENTATIVE RAMSTAD'S STAFF INTRODUCED Mayor Richards
introduced David Hetland from Representative Jim Ramstad's staff. Mr. Hetland
said he could be reached at the Bloomington office ,(8120 Penn Avenue South) and
encouraged the Council Members and the citizens to contact Representative Ramstad
whenever he could be of assistance, whether it be regarding City matters or
personal matters.
ORDINANCE N0. 1993 -6 ADOPTED - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 220 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES; RESOLUTION FOR REVIEW ADOPTED
Presentation by Assistant Manager
Assistant Manager Hughes explained that on April 19, 1993, Council considered the
subject ordinance amendment to permit amusement devices that dispense prizes or
rewards to the individual who has used the machine. Such automatic pay -off
devices are presently prohibited by the City Code. At that meeting, Council
granted First Reading to the proposed ordinance amendment, subject to the
inclusion of a provision whereby the ordinance would automatically terminate in
one year. Such a sunset provision had been used in several prior ordinances. At
the April 27, 1993, Special Meeting, the Council again briefly discussed the
proposed ordinance and staff was directed to provide the locations of other
Circus Pizza restaurants in the metro area and to provide alternate ordinances
for Council's consideration. These alternatives were to include the ordinance as
originally proposed by staff, an ordinance containing a sunset provision, and
lastly, an ordinance providing a review requirement but not a sunset provision.
Assistant Manager Hughes then presented the three alternatives as directed by the
Council. Alternate No. 1 would simply provide that no machine could discharge
money, checks, tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other thing of value which
would have a value greater than the cost to play the machine. Alternate No. 2
would provide an automatic termination provision aimed at April 1, 1995.
Alternate No. 3 would suggest adoption of a resolution calling for review by the
Council in February 1995 rather than automatic termination. Staff believed that
a sunset or review provision should be consistent with the license term for
amusement devices. At present, licenses are issued from April 1 through March 31
of each year. The date of April 1, 1995, would be a more reasonable time for the
purpose of fairly evaluating the effect of the ordinance.
Staff had contacted the Police Departments of the six metropolitan cities where
Circus Pizza establishments are located. In general, Circus Pizza is
characterized by the other departments as a family- oriented business. Four of
the departments report that congregations of young people during the evening
hours presented a public safety demand where off -duty officers or security
personnel are utilized. Circus Pizza is basically described as clean and well -
run. Staff would recommend adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -6, Alternate No. 3.
Presentation by Proponent
Norman Pink, American Amusement Arcades, stated that he was present to answer any
questions and had brought diagrams showing the layout of the Circus Pizza
proposed for Centennial Lakes.
Member Kelly observed that Circus Pizza has hired off -duty police officers as
security for most of their other locations and that she was concerned about
potential problems because of the location, i.e. near water, large parking area,
public park. She asked Mr. Pink if he would agree, in writing, to provide
security at the Centennial Lakes location. Mr. Pink responded in the affirmative
and added that they had intended to provide security just as a precaution because
of their sizeable investment.
Mr. Pink displayed diagrams of the proposed two level Circus Pizza for Centennial
Lakes. He explained that the lower level would have an entrance and would house
the kitchen, a three stage animated show, restaurant seating for 248, coin -
operated kiddie rides (for children under 60 pounds) and a two -level climb and
slide (for children under 48 inches tall). The upper level diagram illustrated
the entrance, control and redemption counter, additional kiddie rides, redemption
games and traditional video games. In response to Member Rice, he said a
security person would be stationed on the upper level.
Member Smith observed that more than one -half of the premises would be devoted to
games and asked about redemption games, hours of operation, anticipated peak
times and potential loitering. Mr. Pink explained that redemption games are
games like skeeball, basketball toss, etc. requiring some skill. They propose to
be open from 11 :00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Monday through Thursday and from 11:00 A.M.
to 11:00 P.M. on Saturdays and Sundays. Anticipated peak times would be
4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. Mr. Pink said that loitering would not be a problem as
here are no benches or other seating inside except for the dining area but may
occur outside in the parking areas.
Member Kelly asked if the food service would be a fast food type of operation and
how many employees would present at any given time. She reiterated her concern
that 'there be plenty of employees to provide supervision. Mr. Pink answered that
much of their business is birthday parties with a hostess for each party and
where the food is served at the table. At peak times there could be a wait for
seating for the general public but no food orders would be taken until seating is
available. There would be approximately 18 employees on the premises at their
busiest time which usually is Saturday afternoons.
Member Paulus asked if Circus Pizza intended to apply for a on -sale beer or wine
license and if it would be a smoke free environment. Mr. Pink said Circus Pizza
would not be applying for a beer or.wine license and that all their locations
became smoke free on January 1, 1993. He mentioned that Circus Pizza has been
active with the D.A.R.E. program and has been hosting parties for the D.A.R.E.
graduates from various schools. Member Paulus asked what generates the majority
of their'income. Mr. Pink answered that the greatest portion of their income
comes from the food operation with most of the profit coming from video games.
Member Smith asked if Circus Pizza would be willing to limit hours of operation
if problems with kids develop. Mr. Pink commented that their concern is for the
health and safety of their customers and the neighborhood. If there were a
problem and if it could be solved by adjusting the hours they would be willing to
do that.
Warren Beck, Centennial Lakes Partners (owners and managers of Centennial Lakes
Plaza), told Council that he has been the landlord for Circus Pizza in Burnsville
for more than six years. He said Circus Pizza is a very family oriented business
and a cooperative tenant. Further, that Circus Pizza has indicated a willingness
to work with the City to make sure that Circus Pizza operates well. As the
landlord, Centennial Lakes Partners would be prepared to do the same. From past
experience, he said he felt a good working relationship would maintain a positive
environment for Centennial Lakes which would be consistent with and would
compliment other uses there now.
`favor Richards asked, assuming all are in agreement that congregating of groups
would not be desirable, what steps would ensure that this type of activity would
not occur. Mr. Beck.answered those choices may include: 1) providing some
security, 2) reviewing hours of operation, 3) examining how a business is
operating that would result in attracting persons to the area, etc. Mayor
Richards commented he could not support allowing this type of activity if the
introduction of this type of business to the Centennial Lakes area would change
the positive existing environment in any way. Mr. Beck responded that Circus
Pizza has demonstrated a willingness to work with the City to manage those kinds
of situations should they occur.
Public Comment
Mayor'Richards called for public comment on the proposed ordinance amendment that
would permit certain prizes for amusement devices. Kathy Pappas, 6730 Vernon
Avenue, commented that Circus Pizza can control behavior inside their building
but if kids are told to move on it then becomes a problem for the area.
Council Comment /Action
Member Smith commented that because of the public money and commitment invested
in the Centennial Lakes development he had reservations about supporting the
ordinance amendment that would allow this type of activity as it seemed in
conflict with the type of recreation the City is trying to promote in the
adjacent public park. He contended that Circus Pizza really operates as two
businesses because of the clientele - a family- oriented business and a late hours
business. What is at issue is the late hours business and related potential
problems. He suggested that, if the amendment was adopted without a sunset
provision and if problems develop, there be some recourse provision so that it
would not become a public problem, i.e. cost of enforcement or affect the
Centennial Lakes environment.
Member Paulus said she understood that the issue before the Council was whether
or not to allow the type of amusement machine that would permit redemption prizes
and that any other type of amusement device would be allowed under the City's
current ordinance. Further, that young people would go there regardless of
whether or not Circus Pizza had the type of machine that would dispense tickets
for prizes. She said she would support amending the ordinance to allow them.
Assistant City Manager Hughes clarified for Member Rice that the value of the
tickets or coupons returned for a single play could not exceed $.25. If the
amendment ::ere adopted, it would not be location specific but would apply to all
locations licensed for amusement machines.
Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Alternate No. 2 of Ordinance
No. 1993 -6 as presented, except for automatic termination on April 19, 1994.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Mr. Beck submitted that, because Circus Pizza may not open until September, 1993,
there would not be an adequate period of time to evaluate its operation and to
work out solutions if indeed there any problems. He said he would appreciate
adoption of a resolution setting a date certain for the Council to review the
ordinance to allow discussion on the subject with the Council.
Member Rice said he would support the motion as it stands but concurred with the
suggestion of Mr. Beck that there be a reasonable time for evaluation and
discussion prior to the effective date of the sunset provision.
Member Kelly indicated her support for alternate No. 3 without a sunset provision
but.with a resolution for Council review on a specific date.
Mayor Richards said he felt there should be some continuity and would concur with
Member Kelly for a date certain on which to evaluate the effect of the ordinance
amendment.
Member Smith offered an amendment to the motion that Ordinance No. 1993 -6 be
scheduled for review at the second regular meeting of the Council in January,
1994. `lotion to amend was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Smith then moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -6 as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -6
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 220 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PERMIT CERTAIN PRIZES FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 220.11 is amended to read as follows:
11220.11 Automatic Pay -Off. No person shall keep, maintain, sell, or
permit to be operated any machine which has been converted into an
automatic pay -off device which shall discharge coins, checks or other
tokens to the operator or player of such machine. No person shall convert
any machine into an automatic pay -off device. Provided, however, machines
which discharge money, checks, tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other
thing of value which has a value no greater than the cost to play or
operate the machine may be kept, maintained or operated subject to the
provisions of Subsection 220.15."
Section 2. Section 220 is amended by providing a new Subsection 220.15 to
read as follows:
11220.15 Automatic Termination. The provisions contained in the last
sentence of Subsection 220.11 shall terminate automatically at 12:01 A.M.
on May 26, 1994."
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its
passage and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
Member Smith also moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Manager is
hereby directed to place Ordinance No. 1993 -6 on the Council Agenda for January
17, 1994 for the purpose of reaffirming, amending, or repealing said ordinance.
Motion for adoption was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*AWARD OF BID FOR ARTICULATED SIDEWALK PLOW CONTINUED TO 6/7/93 Motion was made
by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the award of bid
for an articulated snowplow to the meeting of June 7, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR BUCK SHOT FOR SEAL COAT PROGRAM Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for FA3 Modified Buck
Shot to sole bidder, Prior Lake Aggregates, at $10.50 per ton, and for Type FA2
to sole bidder, Shiely Company, at $7.24 per ton.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE UTILITY TRACTOR WITH CAB/DETACHABLE LOADER
CONTINUED TO 6/7/93 Motion was made by member Paulus and was seconded by Member
Kelly to continue to award of bid for a four -wheel drive utility tractor with
cab /detachable loader to June 7, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 6111/93 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman briefly
reviewed the discussion that occurred at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting of
May 11, 1993.
Member Smith made a motion to approve the following recommended actions listed in
Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 11, 1993:
1) Establish a policy for use of the following categories of warning sigpage to
be applied to neighborhood traffic safety concerns: (a) INTERNATIONAL PEDESTRIAN;
(b) SPEED ADVISORY; (c) "CURVE "; (d) "PARR" and "PLAYGROUND"; and (e) "SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES ", i.e. "BLIND DRIVEWAY" on collector streets above 30 miles per
hour or "DEAF CHILD ".
2) (a) Installation of "S" curve signage on both ends of Woodcrest Drive and
speed advisories as recommended by City staff; and (b) to suggest to the School
District that the school bus stop be re- located to a more open area.
3) (a) Installation of international pedestrian signage along the entire length
of Ridgeview Drive; (b) installation of appropriate speed advisory signage; (c)
to conduct a traffic study in the area after 5:00 P.M.; and (d) recommend to area
residents that they strongly consider installation of sidewalks.
4) (a) Installation of a "STOP" sign westbound on West 55th Street at Beard
Avenue South; (b) refer the matter to the Traffic Enforcement Unit for
enforcement action; and (c) direct City staff to cooperate with the neighborhood
in preparing an educational letter for distribution in the area.
5) Installation of an international teeter - totter sign with the word "PARK"
below it on Heights Park property facing Limerick Lane.
6) Installation of international teeter- totter signs with the word "PARK" or
"PLAYGROUND" below it on Hansen Road just north and south of Birchcrest Park.
7) Installation of international teeter- totter signs with the word "PLAYGROUND"
below on Cornelia Drive in the area of West 68th Street and on West 66th Street
at the entrance to Cornelia Park, and to refer speed concerns to the Police
Department for possible enforcement action.
8) Installation of a "YIELD" sign on eastbound Navaho Trail at Cherokee Trail.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
(Member Rice left the room temporarily at this point in the meeting.)
Member Kelly made a motion to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety
Committee Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards.
Motion carried.
(Member Rice re- entered the meeting at this point.)
REQUEST DENIED FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM FOR MICK'S RESTAURANT AT
SOUTHDALE Planner Larsen explained that Mick's restaurant is in the process of
renovating the old Swenson's Ice Cream Parlor space at Southdale. Staff has been
working with the architect on signage since March to ensure that the sign plan
would meet ordinance requirements.
Mick's has proposed seven signs totalling 177.68 square feet for the storefront
which would comprise 11.48% of the 1,547 square foot elevation. Sign permit
applications had not been submitted prior to the Council Meeting of May 3, 1993.
Mick's has requested special consideration of their sign permit applications to
allow erection of the signs in time for their opening on June 11, 1993.
John Ryder, Arrow Sign Company, stated that he was employed by Mick's to obtain
their sign permits. He confirmed that they have been working with City staff for
almost a month on various design plans for the restaurant's signage and after
conferring with Southdale management and the restaurant they felt they had agreed
on a sign plan that would meet City requirements. On Tuesday, May 4, he was very
surprised to learn of the moratorium on signs.
Ron Thomas, General Manager of Southdale Center, asked consideration by the
Council in granting Mick's a permit to erect their signage. He said that
although Southdale is a substantial retail attraction for the community, they
have been trying to encourage full - service sit down restaurants into Southdale.
He submitted that, under today's market pressures, for a restaurant to open
without signage would put Mick's at somewhat of a distressed opening. He asked
that Council consider the petition of Mick's for an exemption to the moratorium.
Mayor Richards commented that the Council has grappled with the sign issue many
times and unanimity as to viewpoint may never be reached. He noted that a second
request for exception (Agenda Item VII.A) has been received from Pearle Vision
Express located at 7062 York Avenue. One method to deal with the requests would
be to stop the moratorium altogether and direct staff to come back with
alternatives relative to modification of the sign ordinance.
Member Smith stated that, based upon the discussion at the May 3, 1993 meeting,
he felt the moratorium on signage was appropriate. He added that a case-for
exception could be made for remodeling projects that were nearly completed except
for signage prior to the moratorium.
Member Kelly stated that next on the agenda was the staff report on sign
ordinance issues. She asked if a decision on both Mick's Restaurant and Pearle
Express moratorium exceptions could be delayed until after that discussion. She
added that she felt these businesses could open without signage.
Member Kelly made a motion that Council hear Agenda Item VI.0 - Report on Sign
Ordinance Issues before taking action on the requests for exception from the sign
moratorium. Motion failed for lack of second.
Member Paulus asked if there would be any difference between granting the
exception under a remodeling project versus a new building project. Attorney
answered that the moratorium does not make that type of distinction.
Attorney Gilligan responded to Member Smith that the existing moratorium
ordinance could be amended to except out certain projects that were under way,
i.e. remodeling, when the moratorium was imposed.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the request from Mick's Restaurant for
exception to the sign moratorium to June 7, 1993, and to direct staff to draft an
amendment that would address projects in some stage of completion where signage
was eminent when the moratorium ordinance was adopted. Motion was seconded by
Member Paulus.
Member Rice commented that he could not support the motion because when the
subject of a moratorium was discussed the Council recognized that it could be a
problem for some. Further, that he felt a business about to open could consider
temporary signs. Attorney Gilligan clarified that the moratorium only applies to
signs that require a permit.
Mavor Richards then called for vote on the motion on the floor.
:fives: Paulus, Smith
Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards
Motion failed.
Mayor Richards made a motion to grant an exception to the sign moratorium to
Mick's at Southdale to allow erection of signage that would require no variance
from the existing ordinance requirements. Motion failed for lack of second.
REQUEST DENIED FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM FOR PEARLS VISION EXPRESS
Mayor Richards made a motion'to grant an exception to Pearle Vision Express, 7062
York Avenue, from the sign moratorium to allow erection of signage that would
require no variance from the existing ordinance requirements. Motion failed for
lack of second.
REPORT GIVEN ON SIGN ORDINANCE ISSUES Planner Larsen reported that on May 3,
1993, Council enacted a moratorium on issuance of all new permits for signs.
Following the meeting, staff met to identify the issues raised by the Council
with the intent of bringing those issues back for discussion and direction by the
Council as to possible changes to the existing sign ordinance. The following
'issues were identified:
1. Awnings, canopies and marquees.
2. Sign area (how much allowed in a commercial district).
3. Window /wall area (relationship in determining amount of signage).
4. Freestanding signs (allowable number).
Planner Larsen reviewed the following changes made in 1992 to the sign ordinance
during the ordinance codification process which generally made the ordinance more
restrictive:
1. Subsection 460.03, Subd. 13:
Transparent or translucent awnings, canopies or marquees with signage
=that are backlit will be counted as part of sign area. (Previously
they were not addressed.)
2. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4:
The height of freestanding signs in the PC -1 and PC -2 zones was
reduced from 20 feet to 8 feet. (20 feet for pylon signs; 8 feet for
monument type sign.)
3. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4:
The maximum number of freestanding signs allowed in the PC -1 zone was
reduced from one per building per frontage to one per building.
(Previously, one sign per building per street frontage was allowed in
all Planned Commercial Districts.)
4. Subsection 460.05, Subd. 4A1:
An area identification sign became included in the allowable number
of freestanding signs on a site. (Previously, certain shopping
centers could quality for a freestanding building identification sign
as well as an area identification sign.)
5. Subsection 460.05, Subd. A4:
Permanent window signs are now included in total sign area.
(Previously, such signs were not addressed.)
6. Subsection 460.06, Subd. 3A:
The amount of window area which can be temporarily signed was reduced
from 50% to 25 %.
Planner Larsen showed slides illustrating various existing signs on awnings,
canopies or marquees and sign panels and explained how the following ordinance
requirements applied to each:
A. Such structure shall not be considered as part of the wall area and thus
shall not warrant 'additional sign area.
B. The entire structure shall be considered part of the sign area if
constructed of transparent or translucent material and illuminated so as to
resemble a sign panel.
Graphics were shown to illustrate that sign area is measured in two ways:
1. The smallest single rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the
letters, message, symbol, logo, or figure inscribed into or directly onto a
building or a monument and not affixed to a sign panel.
2. The smallest single rectangle which can be made to circumscribe a sign
panel which bears the letters, message, symbol, logo, or figure.
Additional slides illustrated the following allowable maximums:
PCD -1 District 1.. Sign area - 15% of wall area
2. Freestanding sign - one per building
3. Area for freestanding signs - 80 sq. ft.
4. Height - 8 feet
PCD -2 District 1. Sign area - 158 of wall area
2. Freestanding sign - one per building per
frontage
3. Area for freestanding signs - 80 sq. ft for
first sign, 40 sq. ft. for each additional sign
4. Height - 8 feet
PCD -3 District 1. Sign area - 158 of wall area
2. Freestanding sign - one per building per
frontage
3. Area for freestanding signs - 100 sq. ft. for
first_ sign, 50 sq. ft. for each additional sign
4. Height - 20 feet
Planner Larsen recalled discussion at the May 3, 1993, meeting concerning the
number of freestanding signs that would be allowed for the Biltmore Bowl. and
Blockbuster Video redevelopment. Under the existing ordinance, one freestanding
sign per building per frontage would be allowed. Conceivably, Blockbuster Video
could have three freestanding signs because of the three street frontages and the
Biltmore Bowl building could have two for a potential total of five freestanding
signs on those properties.
Planner Larsen suggested Council may wish to adopt the same language for the
PCD -2 District as was adopted for the PCD -1 District during codification. For
the PCD -3 District it would seem appropriate to keep the maximum number of
freestanding signs at one per building per frontage because the large buildings
are on large tracts of land.
In summary, Planner Larsen stated that the Council might consider the following
options:
Awnings - Any transparent or translucent awning that is illuminated and
appears to be a sign panel be treated as a sign panel even if it does not have a
message on it.
Sign Area Replace or reduce the 158 wall area limitation or place a cap on
the total number of signs that a particular building could have in these
districts. Staff feels the 158 limit has worked well and if reduced or capped it
could lead to many non - conforming situations, i.e. imbalance because of new
tenants coming into a building, desire to keep old signage because of its larger
size resulting in less upgrading and /or maintenance.
Window Area/Wall Area Discount or restrict the amount of window area
counted towards total wall area. This would allow less signage by reducing the
total wall area by discounting windows. This option could drive the architecture
and result in replacing glass with brick.
Freestanding Signs Limit freestanding signs in the PCD -2 to one per
building regardless of the number of street frontages.
In response to Member Kelly's question as to the districts, Planner Larsen
explained that the PCD -3 District is a regional commercial district, i.e. the
greater Southdale area. The PCD -2 District covers two areas: 50th /France and the
Grandview area. The PCD -1 District would include 44th /France, Valley
View/Wooddale and 70th /Cahill. Member Kelly commented that her concern regarding
free standing signs was accomplished by the suggested limitation for the PCD -2
District. Further, that the option to treat illuminated awnings as a sign would
reflect the interpretation of the Council.
Member Rice stated that the report as presented was exactly what he was looking
for. He said he felt that the 158 maximum wall area was reasonable and concurred
that one freestanding sign per building be allowed except for the PCD -3 District.
He suggested that the words "with signage" be stricken from Subsection 460.03,
Subd. 13 so that it would read, "Transparent or translucent awnings, canopies or
marquees that are backlit will be counted as part of sign area ".
Member Smith asked if the issue of an illuminated or neon stripe around a
building had been addressed. Planner Larsen pointed out that Subsection 460.04
prohibits in all districts "Neon or fiberoptic light sources which are not within
the permitted sign area." If such are used, they must be included in computing
the 15% sign area to be in compliance.
Member Paulus reiterated her concern about windows being counted as wall area and
cited the example of Walgreen's on 49 1/2 Street /France Avenue. She said she
felt they should be encouraged to convert the colored glass to windows. Planner
Larsen responded that Walgreen's would have preferred a blank brick wall along
France Avenue because their floor plan does not work with windows. However,
staff felt that any future retailer using that building should have available
window space that could be opened up; the resulting compromise was the colored
glass. He said this did not give Walgreen's additional sign area but made it
more pedestrian friendly. Permanent signage, whether applied to the wall of the
building or to the windows, cannot exceed 15% of the wall area. He pointed out
that allowed temporary window sign area has been reduced from 50% to 25% which
alleviates some of the cluttered look. Member Paulus said she still has a
problem with the fact that, visually, a brick wall can better handle signage
covering 15% whereas a wall with windows and doors with the same 15% sign
coverage appears more crowded.
John Ryder, Arrow Sign Company, submitted that, by counting backlit awnings as
part of the sign area, a hardship would be imposed on small businesses with
small storefronts. He suggested that consideration be given to limiting wattage
or the number of lights allowed in backlit signage. Further, a well -lit store
front also provides a feeling of security for customers.
Member Smith made a motion directing
pursuant to the report presented and
consideration at the meeting on June
Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,
Motion carried.
staff to prepare ordinance amendments
the comments of the Council for
7, 1993. Motion was seconded by Member
Richards
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE PROCESS PRESENTED: SIX MONTHS TRIAL PERIOD TO BEGIN
7/l/93 Manager Rosland presented the draft policy that staff had developed to
enhance the management of the Traffic Safety function in the City. No change in
the current process is recommended until July 1; 1993. After that date, staff
would recommend that the Traffic Safety Committee be reduced in size to include
the City Engineer, the Police Chief and the Assistant City Manager, who would
meet as a technical committee on issues brought forward by a contact person.
A staff contact person, currently Craig Swanson, would work with the public to
clarify concerns and formulate issues. The person(s) requesting signs or other
actions would not discuss such matters with the committee directly but the
contact person would present the public point of view to the committee for
action. After meeting, the technical committee would be permitted to install
warning, informational, and guide signs and stripes without Council approval.
After the technical committee would make its recommendation, the requesting
person(s) would be advised of the outcome and the rationale supporting it. If
there would be disagreement at that point, the process to appeal the
recommendation would be explained to the requestor. The appeal process would be
virtually the same as it is now, i.e. the appeal would be made directly to the
Council during its regularly scheduled meeting. Council could decide to schedule
a public hearing and define the area of notification.
As to staffing, the current committee staff members suggested that the new
process would involve less staff time. The position of staff contact person
could probably be reduced from one -half person time to one - fourth person time.
Any staff changes would be formulated for the budget process. Staff would
recommend a six month trial period to evaluate this process as to its
effectiveness, responsiveness and time commitment by the Council.
Assistant Manager Hughes answered Member Rice that the two citizen members
serving on the current committee had been advised of the possible changes and
were willing to give it a trial .run.
Member Rice made a motion to accept the proposed Traffic Safety process as
presented for a trial period of six months commencing on July 1, 1993. Motion
was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Smith said he had some reservations about not including citizen members as
on other advisory boards and commissions. Manager Rosland responded that after
the trial period the Council may wish to consider an all- citizen review committee
that could make recommendations to the Council.
APPOINTMENT BADE TO PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Richards recommended to Council
the appointment of Lorelei Bergman, 5825 Long Brake Trail, to fill an unexpired
term of on the Planning Commission. Member Smith made a motion for consent of
the Mayor's appointment of Lorelei Bergman to the Planning Commission to fill an
unexpired term to February 1, 1994. Member Rice seconded the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
VACANCY REMAINS ON THE COMMITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor
Richards reminded Council that a vacancy still exists on the Community Health
Services Advisory Committee and asked that names of interested persons be
submitted to him.
REQUESTS FOR EXCEPTION FROM SIGN MORATORIUM RECONSIDERED: MOTION FAILS TO PASS
Member Kelly commented that she felt businesses should be required to obtain a
building permit for either new construction or remodeling before applying for a
sign permit. Further, that because Mick's at Southdale and Pearle Vision Express
had applied for a building permit prior to the moratorium on issuance of permit,
for signs, that their requests for exception from the sign moratorium be
reconsidered.
Member Kelly made a motion to grant exceptions to Mick's at Southdale and Pearle
Vision Express from the sign moratorium.to allow erection of signage provided
such signage would adhere to the proposed ordinance changes approved by the
Council this date. Motion was seconded by Mayor Richards.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards
Nays: Paulus, Rice, Smith
Motion failed to pass.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Belly
to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Register dated May 12, 1993, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund
$276,384.13; CDBG $135.00; Cable $6,630.11; Working Capital Fund $15,993.07; Art
Center $2,300.17; Pool $809.17; Golf Course $401,430.17; Arena $10,509.27; Gun
Range $542.22; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $32,129.43; Utilities $35,083.12;
Storm Sewer $924.29; Recycling $38,237.99; Liquor Dispensary $105,954.06;
Construction Fund $560.00; TOTAL $927,622.20; and for confirmation of payment of
the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 12, 1993
and consisting of 16 pages: General Find $128,479.03; Working Capital $452.00;
Golf Course $137,085.00; Liquor Dispensary $259,656.52; TOTAL $525,672.55.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 10:17 P.M.
City Clerk
A.
ey
O
' • �N�bR10W"�O/
n.a
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: June 7, 1993
Subject: Final Rezoning POD-1,
Planned Office Dist.
to APD:, Automobile
Parking District.
6400 France Avenue S.
Fairview Southdale
Hospital and BTO
Development.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # II- A .
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Grant Final Rezoning approval conditioned on:
1. Continued use of MNDOT property adjacent to Crosstown Highway.
2. Shuttle bus service from lot to hospital.
3. Watershed District grading permit.
Info /Background:
Preliminary rezoning was granted on February 16, 1993. Since then
the zoning ordinance has been amended to make parking structures a
Conditional Use in the APD zone.
The proponents have returned and are now requesting Final Rezoning
approval. The rezoning would allow for redevelopment of the
property as a surface parking lot for use by Fairview Southdale
Hospital staff.
C O U N T 't' H I G I4 W A. Y
r • —r
i
Y
\II
•
.I
I
N
I-
m
��X.3� vv GURS
J
w
4 F
w
I Z -C,
i I I I ' I. .i �� -' I I I I I
s ail j
(:1';, 2
7
t
c
ci ♦'
�7
r
r ! t n I !
Hh ik NG
1 W.o'y 4A:0'
.B Sys c.�y [+ G•5'
= .53.0'
'-' 2i -o�-� -
IE Y.¢,h i 5.5' = i63.o'
iir.=
I
TYP(cA(.. efnGIN4 4 OAY5
��'.
-r P.' y. SlP.LIN4 4 �4`!S
- NG
•
]\
I I 1 I r7
I— i
IIY �: �• I
I I I
i 77 MG
T
tic
c. GL/KRE TFr pRA INAC:;vE
4••6
oSPec.ES ? 8.5'-170.
G' y
jl'
�Tl'
I �-
7'k
E
—
to $
T f;
5 T
_ j
y�T
v I
SITE PLII!:-11-4 L16rwrIN6 SUMM?•RY F- AKKING 5uM4aFRY NUTABE
4 w�= 1"s3o---" AV r4 A0E IuuM I" -n-)N =0.5 Tj '.�>:,. -FU:1. 51;isE sPn.GES ;8. �'. le. o') � =4 =_
At - ulilbe ARE 3iv IZ foNGR� T>: G, 4. LI �+1 T STAN A4iZD5 AR� 3o Fr. 5Q ST_ G �n►�.Gr 3 Pa.:e s 7 5' Iro.o' 1 =-3
PIIALT FAVIW 15 3" 234.1 VJEAi Gu1n�c
Ac O"CrAT'* SA&E IS ed1 44.6&2, t LICRIT Rxe 5A'r6 ARE Z4" r;A. (GNG.
U7r VRAINMsE- y 5l1RPAdE -rtp 4pe;257. LICi}}T fIXTIJRES,ARE 4m WP +- µ� MANDIGAP -
pRoVrM =IV= �5 , �BI.e
A.1 DRIVE :1W ES ARE TNb WFY U.N.C. 7c� <. SPAGL� 77- AIDr -D.
S7D Au.. AKEAS D'7TU7lB� 91 = t7/�M1fi+l. ��`�IY� (tdK' STTa fIXTUIIEb -5£E PLAN �R LY.. �C
:)EVrII.OPMPINT GG7ZP. FAfR�IEW DEVELGPME Ci ?P PP /� �CGh CIA, evINJ „"_11-r
100
OF THE REGMAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
ROLLCAId. Answering rollcall were
CO Motion vas made by Member Rice
Member Paulus to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda
with the exception of removal of VII.D - Recommendation of Hu
Commission - Human Rights Code.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
by Member Rice and was seconded by Member
regular meeting of February 1, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four a
-Tern
ecooded:-by-
presented
O� Motion was made
the minutes of the
ocaugy-n TIM (5533 VEWWAY) ' ._t...
FXNDM= DECISIOW Alim'BEASON Plamme seavracalledvthat. the subject =.-
property, located east of Johnson Dr d south of Vernon Avenue, is a
developed single family lot contai lot area of 20,800 square feet. At its
meeting of January 20, 1993, the it heard a request that proposed the
removal of the existing dwellin creation of two new buildable single family
lots. Variances would be req on both lots for lot width, lot depth and lot
area. Following the hearing Council directed staff to prepare findings of k
fact in support of prelimi plat approval.
Planner Larsen stated indings, decision and reasons have been drafted and
were reviewed by the Attorney. A copy has also been given to the proponent.
Member Smith made ion to adopt the Findings, Decision and Reasons in support
of preliminary pproval to be attached to the Council Minutes and moved
adoption of th loving resolution:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRE1 TMnU2Y PLAT APPROVAL.
FOR GRANGER ADDITION
BE IT REM by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain entitled "GRANGER ADDITION', platted by Winston G. Granger, owner,
and tad at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 16, 1999, be
and ereby granted preliminary plat approval.
M was seconded by Member Rice.
call:
PRXLJIMART REZONING. LBO![ OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) TO AUTOMOBILE PARE=
DISTRICT (APD) APPROVED FOR 6400 FRANCE AVENGE - BTO Develooment/Fairview
Develoament Corsoration Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen informed Council that the subject property, located at 6400 France =
Avenue South, is zoned Planned Office District (POD -1) and is developed witty a
one -story office building containing a floor area of approximately 58,000'sgpara
feet supportssvbyo -&* psrkin&lot... - Thesbuildiaw. vso
ti BTD::
. �._ ---'• _ae•- -r �s??`_yf"'°'so.✓ ,.sue- ca e i�. -~ -- ��.�...w.r - - � ..__ _.
r.r: � .R-- -�c—•� --tea— r �.iaoti
a` .
2/16/93
L01
to rezone the property to Automobile Parking District (APD).
The proposed rezoning would allow the demolition of the existing building and
redevelopment of the site as a surface parking lot with 358 spaces. The surface
parking lot would then become owned by Fairview- Southdale Hospital and used to
support hospital activities. Access - egress would be provided via one curb cut on
West 65th Street. The site plan illustrates existing landscaping as well as some -
new materials (ten eight foot pine trees) which adequately address requirements
for overstory trees. However, the plan does not provide required parking lot
screening along France Avenue and West 65th Street.
The APD requires a setback of 20 feet from streets and 10 feet from side and rear
property lines. The proposed plan complies with setbacks except for the
northerly property line adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. Existing parking
actually encroaches on highway right -of -way. The property owner has an agreement
with the State to use a portion of this right -of -way. Because the redevelopment
plan would continue this encroachment, a variance from the required 10 foot
setback is requested.
The hospital is currently utilizing this site for staff parking. Employees are
shuttled by van to the hospital campus. The utility of the proposed lot for the
hospital would depend on the continued van service or other means to safelyUcrosaw
France- Avenue.'-`
At its meeting of January 27, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of preliminary rezoning and the parking setback variance, conditioned on:
1) Continued use of MnDOT property, 2) Grading permit from Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District, 3) Continuation of shuttle service of other acceptable means
to cross France Avenue, and 4) Landscaping bond to ensure adequate landscaping.
In response to concerns raised by the Planning Commission the proponents prepared
a revised plan illustrating added perimeter landscaping on three sides,
additional landscaping on the France Avenue side to prevent employee crossing in
mid -block and landscaping islands in the center.
Assuming the rezoning is granted, Member Rice asked what the procedure would be
and what control the City would have if in the future the hospital wanted to
build a ramp on the subject property. Planner Larsen explained that under
existing Code provisions the hospital would only have to apply for a permit to
build the structure. He noted that the Planning Commission had raised the ramp
issue more from an aesthetic concern than use and had suggested a review process
that would monitor any proposed change from surface lot parking. He added that
if the property is to be utilized only for parking it should be zoned APD. Staff
response would be to draft an amendment to the Automobile Parking District which
would require a conditional use permit to construct a ramp. Member Smith
suggested that the amendment be considered by the Council for adoption prior to
final rezoning of the property.
Proponent Comment
Allan Hill, BTO Development, said that to expedite the process they would like to
move forward with the rezoning request, but would not object to staff's proposal
to amend the ordinance to make construction of a ramp a conditional use. He
added that he felt they had responded to the landscaping concerns raised by the
Planning Commission.
In response to Member Rice, Mr. Hill said BTO Development would be doing the
demolitionLof the building and reconstruction of the parking lot. Fairview -�
Hospital would-be closing on the property within the next 90 days and be°thaw
102
Member Smith reca
pay parking, ther
66th Street. He
crosswalk, etc.
park on the site
they could not
he pointed out t h
Avenue frontage
intersection at
granting of the
of the shuttle s
hospital utilize
2/16/93
lled that, when the Southdale Medical Building parking lot had
a were many issues and concerns about pedestrians crossing West
asked how the City could be insured from petitions for a
Mr. Hill said that currently 100 Fairview Hospital employees
and the hospital has a shuttle bus service in place. Although
guarantee that some individual will not try to cross the street,
at the design has been laid out with shrubbery along the France
with the intent that any pedestrian would use the controlled
France and 65th Street. Attorney Gilligan interjected that the
parking setback variance could be conditioned upon continuation
ervice. That condition would be in effect so long as the
s the MnDOT right -of -way property.
Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly then asked for public comment on the proposed rezoning
request. No comment or objection was heard.
Council Action
Member Smith made a motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 -A2 as follows
and granting of a parking setback variance for property at 6400 France Avenue
South. conditioned on the following: 1) Amendment to Code Subsection 850.19 -
Automobile Parking District, 2) Continued use of NnDOT property, 3) Grading
permit from Hine =Mils Creek - Watershed District, 4) Continuation of shuttle
service, aad:- 5) Lamdscapingf:bond:.
OBDXUNCM" N0 850-4t,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDII1ANCE (NO. 850)
BY REZONIM PROPERTY FROM PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1)
TO ADTOMOBIIS PARK= DISTRICT (APD)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended
by adding the following thereto:
"The extent of the Automobile Parking District (APD) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
Lot 1, Block 1. SODTHDALE OFFICE PAR[ ADDITION, except that part
thereof which lies Easterly of a line drawn parallel with and 48 feet
westerly of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 30, Township 28, Range-24; thence run Northerly along
Easterly line of said section for a distance of 630.60 feet;
thence deflect left at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of
10 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of 90 degrees for a
distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
line being described; thence deflect left along a tangential
curve having a radius of 5729.58 feet (delta angle 1 degrees 09
minutes 00 seconds) for a distance of 115 feet; thence tangent
to said curve for a distance of 84.30 feet;' thence deflect
right along a tangential curve having a radius of 5729.58 feet
(delta angle 0 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds) for a distance of
84.84 feet to the point of reverse curve; thence Northwesterly
-- — along- said - reverse- curve - having a radius of 123 feet a distance
W
f 140 feet and there terminating, according to the plat
thereof an file or of record in the office of the
Titles in and for Hennepin County.
The extent of the Planned Office District (POD -1) is reduced
the property described above from the POD -1 District."
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
)assage and publication.
lotion was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
First Reading----granted.-
. s.
Registrar of
by removing -.
upon its
1
1-;-,
Registrar of
by removing -.
upon its
1
1-;-,
' 4 g1NA. Arr��
o e `' tA
W
• RMMbi� •
Ines
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: June 7, 1993
Subject: Z -93 -2, and Comp.
Plan Amendment,
Planned Industrial
District to Planned
Commer_c_ial District_
PCD -2, Kunz. /Lewis
Properties by Watso
Centers and Rainbow
Foods.
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # i I . B .
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The subject proposal was first heard by the Council on April 19,
1993. At that time the Council continued the hearing and directed
staff to hire BRW to analyze the traffic impacts of the proposal
relative to other potential reuses of the property.
The traffic study has been completed and is attached for council
review. The study has been made available to the proponents as
well as others who have expressed interest. Representatives of BRW
will attend the hearing.
Notice of the June 7, 1993, hearing was sent to all property owners
within 500 feet of the subject property.
PUBLIC HURIaG CONTINUED TO 5/17193 FOR REZONING (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DIS
PCD -2 PIANNED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (INDUSTRIAL
TO COM[MCIAL)
FOR LEfiI&=Z OIL PROPERTY: TRAFFIC STUDY AUTHORIZED Affidavits
of Notice were presented, approved and ordered
P resentation by Planner
placed on file.
lanner Larsen
advised Council that a proposal
has been received to rezone the
subject property
from Industrial to Commercial
(PCD -2) and to amend the
Comprehensive
Plan designation from Industrial
to Commercial to be consistent
with the proposed rezoning. The subject property contains approximately 8.2
acres and is developed with a manufacturing facility which currently is vacant
(former site of Lewis Engineering) and a warehouse building (Kunz Oil). The
proposed redevelopment would replace the existing buildings with a 66,000 square
foot Rainbow Foods store and a 4,800 square foot restaurant. The development
would be supported by a 427 space parking lot.
In support of their proposal the developers have submitted preliminary
development plans, written support of the request and a traffic study to support
the intensity of the proposal. The recommendation from the Planning Commission
does not include specific zoning or traffic issues but is limited to addressing
the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Planner Larsen recalled that since adoption of the plan in 1980 there have been
several actions and proposals considered which would have affected the use
designation:
July 1984
Land use alternative plan for Grandview Area presented to
Council. Subject site illustrated as suitable for
redevelopment for multi - family housing or office /office
showroom.
September 1986
Council heard multi - family housing proposal for property.
Proposal referred to staff, but never pursued further by
developer.
July 1987
Council voted to accept multi - family housing as an
acceptable reuse of the property.
May 1988
Planning Commission considered retail office
redevelopment of the site and school bus garage north of
Eden Avenue.
September 1990
Council considered retail redevelopment of subject
property and school garage property. No action taken.
August 1991
Council acted to leave Industrial designation in place.
Staff would recommend denial of the proposed rezoning based on inconsistency with
the Comprehensive Plan. Further, staff would not support amending the
Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons:
1) Retail development should only be allowed south of Eden Avenue with a
concurrent redevelopment of the-north frontage of Eden Avenue (bus garage).
2) The retail and office retail uses considered in 1988 and 1990 included
redevelopment of the bus garage.
3) The only reuse of the property the City Council has supported, other
than industrial, is a multi - family residential use.
The Planning Commission only took action on amending the Comprehensive Plan and
recommended it be amended from Industrial to Commercial to allow commercial
development.
In conclusion, Planner Larsen said there are a number of actions the Council
could take on the proposal:
1) The Council could vote to deny the rezoning based on inconsistency with
the Comprehensive Plan.
2) If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation it
could refer the Comprehensive Plan amendment back to the Planning
Commission for public hearing. State Statute requires a public hearing
before the Planning Commission for all Plan amendments. The Commission
could then consider the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment at the-
same time.
3) The Council could grant preliminary rezoning and order the
Comprehensive Plan amendment hearing prior to Final Rezoning approval.
This is not recommended since the Planning Commission has not made a
recommendation on the proposed rezoning.
If Council chooses to consider the merits of the proposal and to amend the Plan,
staff would recommend hiring BRW to review the traffic study submitted by the
proponents.
Presentation by Proponents
Steve Watson, Watson Centers, Inc., stated he was before Council to seek approval
to amend the Comprehensive Plan and to rezone the Lewis/Kunz Oil site to allow
for the development of a Rainbow Foods store and a free standing restaurant on
the site. In an effort to understand the issues most important to the community
as they relate to the redevelopment of the site, they met with City staff,
members of the Council, the present landowners and many of the neighbors.
Four major issues concerning the proposed redevelopment were identified: traffic,
planning /land use, economic viability, and economic impact on the community as a
whole. Mr. Watson said members of the development team would speak to these
issues.
Economic Viability - Dennis Crow, Rainbow Foods Vice ,President /Store Development,
informed Council that Rainbow Foods was a concept developed 10 years ago and
evolved from the former Applebaum Food Market Stores, a family run organization
with a number of stores in the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. Today, there are 27
Rainbow stores'serving this market area, of which 17 are less than 10 years old.
The Rainbow chain has evolved into an up- scale, service oriented warehouse format
that emphasizes quality, variety and 'low, low prices on the good stuff'. The
proposed Edina store will be a Rainbow flagship store with an even greater,level
of service by the addition of a food court seating area adjacent to the deli
department, a customer service counter, typical departments, i.e. meats, fish,
McGlynn's Bakeries, and an in -store branch bank facility.
As part of the site evaluation process, a market study was conducted for this
location. The study evaluated location, site conditions, site network and
access, market conditions, competition, population /demographic characteristics.
The study "indicated that the trade area for this site would basically serve
Edina except for a small fringe of the southern portion of St. Louis Park because
of the location of surrounding stores. The road network will allow access from
the entire City. Currently, there are four supermarkets in the City, with three
being up -scale conventional stores not known for their price image. A
significant number of Edina residents are currently leaving the City to shop at a
discount grocery store outside the City boundaries. With the addition of this
Rainbow store this business can stay within the City.
Mr. Crow pointed out that over the years they conducted their site search they
have had a number of contacts from Edina residents requesting a Rainbow store.
This is the only developable site in the City that is centrally located, provides
access to the entire community, and is the only site that can support a
commercial development like that proposed. He said that there is no doubt that
the Rainbow store will create a competitive climate greater than what exists
today. Although not the most ideal location from a retailer standpoint, it is
the most ideal situation for the City and its residents.
The store will be operated on a 24 -hour basis, closing only for the four major
holidays. It will comply with all the required standards set forth by the City
and will have many architectural amenities that will be a compliment to the City.
19
Planning /Land Use - Mr. John Sharlow, principal with Dahlgren, Sharlow and Uban,
advised Council that his firm had been retained by Watson Centers /Rainbow Foods
to look at planning and land use issues. With graphics he pointed out that the
subject site and a few immediately adjacent sites are the only properties in the
area shown as industrial use on the City's Comprehensive Plan with the subject
property zoned Planned Industrial District (PID). As the past history of the
property indicated, although there have been a number of ideas generated for the
area it remains designated as Industrial and zoned Planned Industrial District.
As land planning consultants for Watson/Rainbow, Mr. Sharlow said as they
analyzed the site they identified the fact that there is a great deal of buffer
around the subject property, in particular the railroad tracks and steep slopes
which block the view of the site from adjacent properties. As to drainage, the
property generally drains to the'north and east. Located immediately to the
south is the Eden Circle office warehouse building, which serves as transition
for the residential properties to the south. In summary, Mr. Sharlow said the
site does offer some constraints from a development perspective in that the
narrow southerly portion makes it difficult to.use it efficiently and tie it into
the northern portion of the site.
Using graphics, Mr. Sharlow presented seven surrounding views from the subject
property and pointed out various features. During the process of analyzing the
site they refined various alternatives for proper access onto Eden Avenue. They
also wanted to orient the building to provide that the vast majority of the
active part of the use, i.e. parking, be located with the building itself serving
as a substantial buffer between it'and the residential area. He pointed out that
the building.is over 200 feet in depth with approximately 360 feet from the rear
of the building to the nearest single family lot. The nearest homes on Edenmoor
Street are separated by a playground and substantial vegetation and the principal
loading area is separated by the location of the Eden Center office /warehouse
building.
In response 'to a letter from the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association which
suggested that the loading areas be next to the railroad tracks, Mr. Sharlow
explained that is a very narrow area and it would be difficult to provide for
appropriate turning movements. The main loading bays are proposed to be located
at the rear of the building and would be screened from the residential area by
the Eden Circle office /warehouse building. A single loading bay for produce will
be located at the southeasterly corner of the building with three produce
deliveries per week anticipated. As a condition for approval, Rainbow Foods are
willing to consider limiting the hours of operation for that loading bay to
mitigate the concerns about late night activity.
Mr. Sharlow noted that the ordinance calls for a parking setback of 10 feet along
an interior or rear lot line and a 10 foot wide setback between a principal use
building and parking or drives. The proposal includes 17 parking spaces along
the interior lot line between the Rainbow Foods store and the rear of the TSC
office building that are setback four feet from the property line. Placing the
parking closer to the interior lot line along the blank side of the TSC building
would provide a 10 foot wide strip for trees to be placed along the building
facade for more effective buffering of both the building and loading areas. The
proposal also includes a 25 foot wide service drive along the eastern property
boundary next to the railroad. This drive is closer than 10.feet along a portion
of the boundary which coincides with the industrial area to the east and is
within three feet at the closest point. The railroad forms a six to eight feet
high berm along this property line that will effectively screen the drive from
the properties to the east. Placing this drive closer to the permanent berm
allows for a larger buffer space along the eastern side of the Rainbow Foods
building for increased landscaping along the building facade. The concept
landscape plan as presented exceeds the City's ordinance requirements and shows
73 understory trees, 17 evergreen trees and 57 overstory trees.
A concern about lighting was also raised by the Richmond Hills Neighborhood.. He
explained that the vast majority of the activity will occur in the parking area.
Although a specific lighting plan has not been developed, Rainbow will commit to
the City that it will look at poles of reasonable height with shoebox type
fixtures providing downcast lighting to make sure that only the parking lot areas
are lighted. Lighting in the rear will be security lighting only using fixtures
that will not produce off -site glare.
In summary, Mr. Sharlow said the developers have worked out a concept plan that
would fit nicely on the subject property. A great deal of time has been spent in
refining the plan to try to deal with the site in such a manner that the activity
is located along Eden Avenue thereby utilizing the building as a barrier and
taking advantage of the fact that the Eden Circle office /warehouse building is an
existing substantial building which presents a transition between the subject
property and the area to the south. They feel it will work well from a
functional standpoint and that their request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and
to rezone to Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) is in order.
Traffic Impact Analysis - Mike Gorman, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc., said his
firm was retained by Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods to conduct a traffic
impact study for the proposed development. The study took a traditional approach
to determine the traffic impact of the proposed development and included:
1) analysis of existing conditions, 2) trip generation of the proposed
development, 3) post - development forecasts of traffic volumes on the surrounding
street system, 4) capacity analysis at key driveways and intersections
surrounding the site, 5) recommendations for street improvements if necessary,
and 6) conclusion as to whether the site is suitable for the proposed
development.
Existing Conditions - The area surrounding the proposed Rainbow Foods store is
well served by the existing street system. Major streets are Vernon Avenue to
the west and Interlachen Boulevard to the north. T.H. 100 to the east provides
regional access with limited movement interchanges at Eden and Vernon Avenues.
Traffic counts taken at the intersection of Vernon Avenue /Link Road on December
9, 1992, between 4:00 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. showed that traffic is able to circulate
within and around the area with little difficulty.
Trip Generation - The study concentrated on trip generation of the site during
the period between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M. on a typical weekday because this is the
time when adjacent street traffic volumes are greatest. Trip generation data was
obtained directly from Rainbow Foods for grocery store generated traffic by
averaging customer transactions from three stores in the metro area. For traffic
generated by the fast food restaurant, data was used from ITE Trip Generation, a
nationally recognized source. Based on this information, Rainbow Foods is
expected to generate daily 4,323 trips and the restaurant 3,034 trips. During
the P.M. peak hour the grocery store will generate 319 trips and the restaurant
will generate 175 trips. Not reflected in these counts are estimated shared
trips, i.e. people who go to the grocery store that also patronize the restaurant
and vice versa, which would reduce the number of total trips to the site.
Information for P.M. peak hour directional distribution of traffic came from the
comprehensive market analysis that was completed by Rainbow Foods. Expectations
are that 208 of the traffic would come from the south on Vernon Avenue, 158 from
Interlachen Boulevard, 108 from southbound T.H. 100 (38 using Vernon Avenue and
78 using Arcadia Avenue), 558 from a mixture of westbound Eden Avenue and
northbound T.H. 100. In addition to new trips, there will also be pass -by trips
(trips on the surrounding_s_treet system that visit the site as part of another
trip) that enter and exit the site. Typically, 40 to 608 of all traffic are
pass -by trips. For this study, it was assumed that the number of pass -by trips
was limited to 258. While pass -by trips do not reduce the driveway volumes into
and out of the site, it does effect the directional distribution.
Capacity Analysis - A capacity analysis was conducted to determine the level of
service (IDS) rating of the driveways onto Eden Avenue from the development as_,
well as the Vernon Avenue /Link Road intersection. The data indicated that the
existing P.M. peak -hour level of service at the Vernon Avenue /Link Road
intersection is good, with an overall LOV of C (acceptable with delays of 15 to
25 seconds per vehicle), with average vehicle delay of 16.7 seconds per vehicle.
In the post - development scenario, the LOV at this intersection will remain C with
an average delay of 18.2 seconds per vehicle. Both indicate an intersection that
currently works well and will continue to work well if the proposed development
is constructed. The same can be said of the two site drives. Both show a Level
of Service A (ideal with delays between 0 and 5 seconds per vehicle) for the
northbound right turns and westbound left turns. The northbound left turn at the
west driveway is LOV D (delays in the 25 to 40 second range) which is considered
acceptable for a non - signalized intersection. Traffic experiencing this level of
service will not affect public street operations as delays will be within the
Rainbow Foods parking lot.
Recommendations - Recommended modifications to the proposed site plan and
surrounding street system include the following:
1. Eden Avenue should be striped to a three -lane section between Arcadia Avenue
and Sherwood Road to provide for westbound left turns into the development.
2. An eastbound right -turn lane should be installed on Eden Avenue for the
westernmost driveway.
3. Adjust traffic signal timing at Vernon Avenue /Link Road to accommodate new
traffic patterns.
4. Signs and markings at the western driveway into SuperAmerica on the north
side of Link Road should be installed indicating "Do Not Block Driveway" to
facilitate westbound left turn into SuperAmerica and southbound movement out
of SuperAmerica onto eastbound Eden Avenue.
Conclusions The following statements summarize the conclusions of the report:
1. The existing street system surrounding the proposed development functions
adequately.
2. Key intersections will continue to function adequately after the development
with no significant decrease in the level of service.
In summary, Mr. Watson concluded that based on the findings of the traffic and
market studies for the site and the information presented, Watson Centers, Inc.
and Rainbow Foods are convinced that the proposed development will satisfy a
community need and be an appropriate and valuable reuse of the site. Further,
the developers are prepared to pay for the off -site modifications to the
surrounding street system as recommended by Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc.
Public Comment
Mayor Richards acknowledged receipt of the following correspondence:
1. April 15, 1993 - Letter from SuperAmerica expressing concern about traffic
generated by the.development.
2. April 16, 1993 - Letter from Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. expressing concerns
about the proposed high intensity use and its impact upon the area.
3. Undated letter from Karen Roach, 5048 Richmond Drive, in favor of a
Rainbow Foods store in this location but expressing concerns mainly about
lighting, noise, and traffic from the proposed development.
Karen Roach, 5048 Richmond Drive, commented that although the lighting.issue -has..
been addressed she still has concerns about noise, trespassing and traffic.
John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, said he was the newly elected president of the
Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association, and on behalf of the Association asked
that the Council not amend the Comprehensive Plan and not grant rezoning.
Concerns of the neighborhood included safety, noise from the loading docks, odor
from the restaurant, lighting and traffic congestion on Eden Avenue.
Vernal LeVoir, 5401 Richmond Lane, objected to the lights from the development
and noise that would be generated from the restaurant.
Jane Stresnak, 5400 Richmond Lane, said the existing road system is confusing and
she has directed many people on how to get onto T.H. 100. The increased traffic
will only add to the number of confused drivers in their neighborhood.
Dan Shebuski, owner of Edina Pet Hospital, said he was thinking of expanding his
building and was concerned that the proposed restaurant would block exposure of
his business. Also, he said he needed to' maintain access to the rear of his
building which he now has by agreement with Lewis Engineering.
Jack Abrahamson, 5209 Richwood Drive, said he was opposed because he did not feel
that a fast food restaurant and a supermarket store belong on that site because
of the traffic problems that will be created.
Dorothy Lodahl, 5201 Richwood Drive, said she does not have a car and walks to
get her groceries. She said added traffic would only make this more difficult.
Steve Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, commented that there is only one way out of his
neighborhood and there are existing traffic problems because the street angle is
too sharp on the downgrade.
Ted Giannobile, said he was the owner of the TSC Office building and was the
closest property owner to the proposed development. He said the existing site is
an eyesore and he would like to see the Rainbow project work because nothing has
happened with previous proposals. He acknowledged that concerns of the
neighborhood have to be addressed.
Dick Stresnak, 5400 Richwood Lane, said in addition to the traffic generated by
the store's customers he questioned how the truck traffic would approach the site
and the number of trucks per week making deliveries.
Susan Leuthold, 5440 Richmond Drive, said the proposed development is over
zealous and not feasible for the area because of the traffic it would generate.
Dick Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street, commented that the noise from trucks backing
to loading docks would impact the residents in his neighborhood as well as the
congestion at Link /Sherwood /Eden as there is only one way in /out of their
neighborhood.
Presentation for Jerry's Enterprises. Inc.
Tim Keene, Larkin- Hoffman, said he. represented Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and that
he and others would address the concerns of Jerry's Enterprises related to the
development proposed by Watson Construction/Rainbow Foods. Key to the proposal
are traffic and land use issues.
Jerry's Enterprises has made significant investments in both commercial and
office facilities to serve this area and these were made in reliance on the
Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Redevelopment Plan. Jerry's Enterprises will
undertake a multi - million dollar make -over of its existing food store this
summer. From 1988 through 1990, Jerry's Enterprises in partnership with Opus
Corporation worked with the City in developing various redevelopment plans for
the Kunz /Lewis site. At that time the rational of the City was that commercial .
uses should not jump past the school district bus facility to the south side of
Eden Avenue without first providing an orderly land use transition. Attempts
were made to work with the school district to redevelop the school district bus
site.but nothing emerged and the development plans were dropped.
Mr. Keene said the primary concern is that the proposed development is "too much"
and would impose a high velocity, high volume 24 -hour per day operation into an
existing neighborhood with surrounding businesses that serve that neighborhood.
He submitted that the Final Development Plan for 5.113 West 50th Street approved
by Council this date will generate new traffic to the area and the Watson/Rainbow
proposal should be considered with that in mind. The land use issue is one of
compatibility with the existing land use patterns and the City should consider
more appropriate, non - intensive commercial uses or alternative uses such as have
been proposed over the last decade. Mr. Keene requested that the proposed
development not receive encouragement from the Council and that the Council
continue to pursue other compatible redevelopment proposals which address the
entire area.
Blair Tremair, planning consultant, said he was asked to look at the basic issue
of comprehensive planning. He submitted the following objections to the proposed
development project:
1) It would negatively impact the neighborhood character because of the traffic,
significant public subsidy, i.e. traffic control, street re- arrangements,
intrusion by high intensity use, intense asphalt, and odors and trespassing
related to the fast food restaurant.
2) The Rainbow Foods store will become a regional store and shopped by people
outside of Edina.
3) The Comprehensive Plan says that spot zoning to allow the introduction of a
particular use should be avoided where possible.
4) This site is not the only location where a Rainbow Foods store could go.
5) The current property owner is not being denied a reasonable use of the
property under the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. Eventually, the
owner will connect with a developer who can introduce a lower intensity use.
6) Proposal does not meet the Rainbow Foods criteria in that it is not located
on arterial road and does not have visibility.
Mr. Tremair concluded that there are better uses for this property and depending
on the policy of the City he suggested that the City consider clearing the site
to resolve the aesthetic issue. He said redevelopment will find its way for this
property with a less intensive use.
Glen Van Wormer, traffic engineer with Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, said his firm
was asked to review the area and the traffic analysis prepared by Barton - Aschman
and give an opinion as to will the development fit and what will be some of the
traffic problems and transportation concerns. He said there is no question that
traffic volumes will increase significantly and that the numbers used by Barton -
Aschman are conservative as presented. More importantly, the levels of service
have been calculated based on development traffic and existing traffic. Not
addressed is what will be there 10 years from now. In the metropolitan area
traffic grows on streets at the rate of 2 -4% per year. With only a one percent
growth, traffic on Vernon Avenue would go from 13,000 to 16,500.
Mr. Van Wormer said that Eden Avenue is not a major street, has a number of
driveways and also school bus traffic four times a day. The Link /Sherwood
intersection has some sight restrictions and is the only way out of the adjacent
residential neighborhood. Traffic coming off Vernon desiring to make a left turn
into SuperAmerica,will have difficulty. There is also the potential that the
school bus site will redevelop generating additional traffic. With regard to
restriping Eden Avenue so that the center lane would function as a two way turn
lane, he submitted that although such lanes work well there are potential
problems when there are heavy uses, numerous driveways and curves. The site
itself has potential operational problems., i.e.,only 50 feet from the street to
the point where the vehicles have to turn either right or left and trucks will
have.a lengthy on -site trip to the rear loading bays. In conclusion, Mr. Van
Wormer said the development would create some operational concerns that the City
should carefully evaluate.
Finally, Mr. Keene submitted that ample testimony has been given in support of
the proposition that the proposed development is not compatible with the area and
requested that the application be denied in favor of a redevelopment scheme that
would be more appropriate to the neighborhood and to the existing transportation
network.
Gordon Lewis, owner of Lewis Engineering, commented that, while he understood the
opposition of Jerry's Enterprises to the proposed development, he felt he was
being held hostage by the situation as previous proposals for the site had not
proceeded and he is paying $58,000 in real estate taxes each year. He said there
will be redevelopment here and although people do not like change something will
happen. He submitted that the proposed development would be a quality project
but that the decision as to the best use of the land was up to the Council.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards commented that the Council has spent a considerable amount of time
on this site and other sites in the Grandview Redevelopment District. The issue
is not necessarily one of the proposed land use as on various occasions the
Council has considered proposals for multi - residential, industrial or commercial.
Any number of land uses may well work and be consistent with surrounding
neighborhood and adjacent uses. The question is how much development is
appropriate for the site and the existing infrastructure for the area.
Before considering an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, he recommended that
the Council hire a consultant to sift and sort through all the information that
has been presented and to advise the Council, from a neutral position and with
the public's interest in mind, on exactly what are the major issues relating to
the proposed development. Mayor Richards submitted that Jerry's Enterprises,
Inc. has been one of the best corporate citizens of Edina and that public money
has been invested in the Grandview District for public improvements to the
infrastructure. The Council must assure that whatever is done on the Lewis/Kunz
sites will not jeopardize what has,been done in the District since it was
created.
Member Smith said he agreed that the Council needs to have the advice of an
independent consultant to support whatever decision is ultimately made.
Member Rice stated that, while he was not inclined to support the proposed
development, he concurred that in view of the number of residents who had
expressed concern about the traffic, the recommendations of a consultant would be
enlighting. He suggested that the analysis include the reasonable projection of
the projects approved for the Regis properties earlier in order to ascertain the
overall impact of traffic for whatever proposal might come before the Council in
the future.
Member Paulus commented that development on the subject property would be as
dense a use as allowed by ordinance because the land value is too high. Other
proposals have failed because the land cost made those projects not feasible
under the City's restrictions. She concurred that traffic is the core issue and
suggested that any independent study include all potential land uses for the
site.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing and to authorize staff to
retain BRW, Inc. as consultant for the City to analyze the traffic impact of the
proposed Watson/Rainbow Foods development for the Lewis/Kunz sites, to include
impact of potential land uses for the sites, and to also include traffic impact
from the Regis site projects and report back to the Council at the May 17, 1993,
meeting. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO 1993 -5 ADOPTED (AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND 1230 TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS
ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS): SECOND READING WAIVED Assistant Manager Hughes reminded
Council that at the meeting of April 5, 1993, draft Ordinance No. 1993 -5
(Amending Section 1200 and.Section 1230 of the City Code to Permit Pushcarts on
Public sidewalks) was considered by Council and several revisions were
recommended which have now been incorporated into the amendment. Council also
discussed charging a fee for the issuance of a permit. The Health Department
already charges a fee of $120.00 per year for a push cart license. Staff felt
that the fee should adequately cover the cost incurred by the City in issuing a
permit and therefore no additional fee is recommended.
Mayor Richards recommended that a sunset provision be included so that Council
could review the ordinance before the,next licensing year.
Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -5 as follows, with waiver of
second reading:
ORDINANCE 30. 1993 -5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND SECTION 1230
OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT PUSHCARTS ON
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS IN THE 50TH AND FRANCE COMMERCIAL AREA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 1200.02 is amended by adding a new
paragraph as follows:
"P. Pushcarts as defined in Section 720 of this Code placed on sidewalks
and public walkways within the area included in the plan prepared by the
ERA entitled 050th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974,
subject to a permit issued pursuant to Subsection 1230.02 of this Code."
Section 2. Paragraph R. of Subsection 1230.02 is amended as follows:
"R. Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy astreet to sell any farm produce
or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling
of services. The prohibition in this paragraph shall not apply to the sale
of food and beverages from pushcarts, as defined by Section 720 of this
Code, located on sidewalks and other public walkways within the area
Included in the plan prepared by the BRA entitled, "50th and France
Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued
pursuant to this paragraph.
1. In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no
permit shall be issued for a pushcart unless the following
requirements are met:
a. The pushcart must be licensed in accordance with Section 720
of this Code.
b. The applicant for a permit must possess a valid food
establishment license or take -out food license, pursuant to
Section 720 of this Code, for a food establishment located in
the 50th and France commercial area.
Grandview Area
Traffic Study Update
City of Edina
Grandview Area
Traffic Study Update ( #2)
Prepared for:
City of Edina .
Housing and Redevelopment Agency
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Prepared by:
BRW, Inc.
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
May 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY ...... ...............................
INTRODUCTION . ............................... .
EXISTING CONDITIONS ...........................
Existing Land. Uses ...........................
Existing Transportation System. .................. .
f Existing Traffic Volumes ........................
PLANNED ROADWAY SYSTEM .................. .
PROPOSED/EXPECTED CONDITIONS ..................
TRIP GENERATION ...............................
TRIP DISTRIBUTION ..............................
SITE- GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS ......
POST - REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC FORECASTS .........
TRAFFIC ANALYSES .............................
Capacity Analysis ............................
Sunday Morning Capacity Analysis ................
Signal Warrant Analysis ........................
Queuing Analysis ............................
Accident Analysis ............................
GEOMETRIC ALTERNATIVES FOR EDEN AVENUE ......
SECONDARY ACCESS FOR AREA SOUTH OF
EDEN AVENUE ... ...............................
CONCLUSIONS ... ...............................
RECOMMENDATIONS .............................
APPENDIX ...... ...............................
Al2$!I
i
1
5
5
5
10
13
14
17
22
25
28
31
31
39
39
42
44
45
49
52
56
57
LIST OF FIGURES
1
Site Location Map ............................
2
2
Location of Proposed/Expected Redevelopment
Sites ... .. .._ ...............
. 3
3
Existing Site Conditions ........................
6
4
Existing Roadway System .......................
7
5
Key Intersection Locations ......................
9
6
Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions at
Key Intersections .............................
11
7
Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ............
12
8
Proposed Post - Redevelopment Conditions ............
15
9
Expected Directional Distribution of Retail
Traffic Within Grandview Area ...................
26
10
Site - Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts
at Key Intersections ...........................
27
11
Post Rainbow Foods Development PM Peak Hour
Traffic Forecasts at Key Intersections ...............
29
12
Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour Traffic
Forecasts at Key Intersections ....................
30
13
Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods South Access
Warrant #11 Analysis ..........................
40
14
Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North Access
Wan-ant #11 Analysis ..........................
41
15
Average Weekday Traffic Demand on Eden Avenue
Between Sherwood Road and Arcadia Avenue ........
46
#12931
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
16 Eden Avenue Recommended Roadway Improvements ... 47
17 Conceptual Illustration of Secondary Roadway
Connection ... ............................... 50
IA Post - Redevelopment Sunday Morning
(10:00 -11:00 AM) Traffic Forecasts . _ _ . .... Appendix
Simi
LIST OF TABLES
1
Existing Transportation System ...................
8
2
Expected Trip Generation of Proposed
Development ............................ ..
18
3
Expected Trip Generation of Proposed
Development South of Eden Avenue .................
20
4
Directional Distribution Analysis ..................
23
5
Existing Levels of Service ......................
33
6
Levels of Service with only Rainbow Foods
Development and with Market Study Distribution ......
34
7
Levels of Service with only Rainbow Foods
Development and with Trace Study Distribution .......
35
8
Levels of Service with All Redevelopment Including
Rainbow Foods and with Market Study Distribution ....
36
9
Levels of Service with All Redevelopment Including
Rainbow Foods and with Trace Study Distribution .....
37
10
Required Storage Lengths of Turn Lanes at
Vernon Avenue/Link Road Intersection .............
43
01MI
SUMMARY
The original Grandview Area Traffic Study was completed by BRW, .Inc.
- _ for the City of Edina in April -of 1984:- The original study assumed future
office developments in the areas southeast of the existing Eden Avenue/
Sherwood Road intersection, southwest of the existing Vernon Avenue/
TH 100 southbound ramps intersection and between Eden Avenue and the
existing Jerry's Foods store.
The traffic study was updated in 1990 by BRW, Inc. -to determine the
impacts resulting from retail/office/Jerry's Foods expansion in the area
between Eden Avenue and existing Jerry's Foods and retail/bus garage
land uses in the area southeast of the existing Eden Avenue /Sherwood
Road intersection.
The area southeast of the existing Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road inter-
section is currently proposed to be redeveloped to provide a Rainbow
Foods Supermarket and a fast -food restaurant. The area southwest of the
existing Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramps intersection is also
proposed to be redeveloped to include a Blockbuster Video store, a
Davanni's restaurant, a Snyder Drug store, a funeral home and a Great
Clips hair salon. In addition, other minor redevelopments have recently
occurred within the Grandview area that were not accounted for in the
previous analysis.
As a result of these proposed land use changes and potential traffic
implications, the City of Edina retained BRW, Inc. to conduct a second
update of the Grandview Area Traffic Study in order to address the
potential traffic related issues. The conclusions and recommendations of
this traffic analysis are listed below.
CONCLUSIONS
• The proposed Rainbow Foods/fast -food development south of Eden
Avenue is expected to generate approximately 8,270 daily vehicle
trips, including 297 inbound and 285 outbound trips during the PM
peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no
internal or passerby trips and TTE "supermarket" trips rates, which
are likely high for this type of grocery store.
.EMI
i
• The proposed and expected redevelopment of the four sites within
the Grandview area: 1) Rainbow Foods, 2) Regis Corporation,
3) Jerry's expansion (assumed), and 4) Murphy Automotive is
expected to generate approximately 15,860 daily vehicle trips,
including 573 inbound and 645 outbound vehicle trips during the PM
peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no
internal or passerby trips.
• A comparison of the three possible development scenarios for the
area sou_ t_h of.Eden Avenue (Rainbow Foods development, medium
density residential development or office /office- showroom
development) indicate that the proposed Rainbow Foods development
would be expected to generate significantly more traffic than the
other two development alternatives.
• The expected directional distribution of site - generated traffic to and
from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other proposed/
expected retail development was based on a vehicle trace study
conducted by BRW, Inc. The trace study was conducted by
following vehicles from the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store to
determine their travel routes to /from the area. The trace study
distribution estimates that the major approach roadways to the
redevelopment sites will be Vernon Avenue to /from the southwest
(47 percent), Interlachen Boulevard (15 percent), TH 100 (16
percent) and Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east (13 percent).
A market study conducted by the developers of the Rainbow Foods
site estimated the directional distribution as; 20 percent to /from
Vernon Avenue to the southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen
Boulevard, 28 percent via TH 100 and 37 percent via Vernon and
Eden Avenues to the east. This market study distribution was also
analyzed in this report.
• Capacity analyses indicate that the existing key intersections within
the Grandview area currently operate at acceptable levels of traffic
operations (LOS D or better) during the PM peak hour, with the
exception of the left- turning movements from the two Jerry's Foods
access drives onto southbound Vernon Avenue, which operate at
LOS E and LOS F. However, field observations of these
intersections indicate that the existing traffic signals at Interlachen
Boulevard and Link Road create enough gaps in the Vernon Avenue
traffic stream to allow these movements to occur with only moderate
delays, and, accident analysis indicate that there have not been
accident problems at these locations.
812831 ii
r
In addition, the capacity analyses of the existing conditions also
indicate that the southbound to eastbound left- turning movement at
the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently
operates at capacity.
• Capacity analyses of the post - redevelopment PM peak hour traffic
conditions, with either the trace study or market study distributions,
indicate 'that each of the key intersection locations should continue
to operate at an acceptable level of service, with the exception of the
three movements noted above as being deficient in the existing
conditions.__ These movements are likely to continue to operate at
unacceptable levels and to decline in the post - redevelopment
conditions.
• A capacity analysis was also conducted for the expected post -
redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) Sunday morning traffic
conditions to determine if patrons of the Our Lady of Grace Church
would be expected to encounter difficulties in exiting onto Eden
Avenue during the Sunday morning grocery shopping period. The
analysis indicated that the exiting movements from the church access
onto Eden Avenue should operate at an acceptable level (LOS C)
during the Sunday morning period.
• Queuing analyses indicate that the 200 feet of available storage
distance on the east approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road
intersection is :expected to be exceeded during the post - Rainbow
Foods development conditions with either the trace study or market
study distributions. The expected traffic queues from the east
approach left turn lane may block left - turning traffic to and from
Sherwood Road, which would provide the area south of Eden
Avenue with only right in/right out access during the PM peak
period.
Queuing analyses also indicate that the right turning movements on
the east and south approaches and the left- turning movement on the
north approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection may be
deficient in the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period.
• The forecasted post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) traffic
demand on Eden Avenue is expected to exceed the capacity of a two -
lane roadway. However, a three -lane roadway with a two -way left
turn lane (TWLTL) should adequately accommodate the expected
traffic demand.
• The construction of a second access roadway to and from the
Sherwood neighborhood, south of Eden Avenue, would be desirable
for public safety reasons (emergencies) and because the existing
access roadway (Sherwood Road) may be blocked during a large
portion of the PM peak hour. The construction of this roadway will
require cooperation from Rainbow Foods as it will likely impact their
development plans.
This traffic study concluded that the future traffic operation within the
Grandview area of the City of Edina will be acceptable, with or without
the proposed redevelopment within this area (including the Rainbow Foods
development), if the recommendations within this report are implemented.
RECON O ENDATIONS
• Widen Eden Avenue from Sherwood Road to the TH 100 South-
bound on -ramp to a 44 -foot urban section (three 12 -foot lanes and
4-foot shoulders) with a center two -way, left -turn lane.
• Provide a secondary access to the Sherwood neighborhood via a new
road that would be located between the existing Soo Line Railroad
right -of -way and the proposed Rainbow Foods store. The right -of-
way for this access roadway would need to be negotiated with
Rainbow Foods.
• Provide an exclusive right turning lane into the proposed Rainbow
Foods site off of Eden Avenue.
_ • Monitor the traffic demands at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road
intersection following the Rainbow Foods development and adjust the
' traffic signal timing if necessary.
• Install signage near the existing Super - America access drives onto
Link Road instructing motorists queued on Link Road not to
physically block left -turn access in/out of Super - America.
• Monitor the accident conditions at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen
Boulevard intersection, particularly the westbound to southbound left -
turning movement, and construct an exclusive left turn lane with
protective signal phasing, if necessary.
•1MI iv
INTRODUCTION
Watson Centers, Inc. and Rainbow Foods propose to redevelop 8.2 acres
within- the City-of Edina -to- include a 65;900- square - foot- grocery store -and-
a 4,800 - square -foot fast -food restaurant. The proposed redevelopment: site
is located southeast of. the Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road intersection
within the Grandview area of the City of Edina. The property is currently
zoned Planned Industrial District (PID) and contains two buildings that are
or have been consistent with this designation. The proposed redevelop -
ment would raze the two existing industrial -type buildings and construct
'the two proposed retail buildings. This would require a rezoning of the
property to Planned Commercial District (PCD).
The Grandview area of the City of Edina is bounded on the east by Trunk
Highway 100 (TH 100), on the west by. Grandview Avenue, on the north
by Interlachen Boulevard and on the south by Richwood Drive (Figure 1).
In addition to the proposed Rainbow Foods development, there are other
areas within the Grandview_ area that are currently planned or expected to
redevelop. These "other" sites include the future redevelopment of the
Regis Corporation site, located southwest of the Vernon Avenue/TH 100
Southbound Ramps intersection, the future redevelopment of the area
immediately north of Eden Avenue and south of existing Jerry's Foods and
the current construction of an automotive store one block west of the
Vernon AvenuetInterlachen Boulevard intersection on the north side of
Vernon Avenue (Figure 2).
As a result of concerns by City staff regarding traffic - related issues within
the Grandview area, BRW, Inc., was retained to evaluate the traffic
impacts of the proposed and expected redevelopments and to compare
these impacts with those documented in the 1984 Grandview Area Traffic
Study (BRW, Inc.), the 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Study Update (BRW,
Inc.) and the 1993 Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study (Barton -
Aschman). This report would then serve as an updated version of the
Grandview Area Traffic Study.
This study documents the existing traffic conditions within the Grandview
area, estimates the traffic generated by the proposed Rainbow Foods
redevelopment and the other expected redevelopments, distributes and
assigns these traffic volumes to roadways adjacent to the developments,
and evaluates key intersections and access points related to the sites. The
UJPT -M]
Site
"T"OF Location Map
4"
May 1993'
- NZ-f-
ST.
Y
ga
cc J WOOD
�Z
LA.
Q- W_ Q
> W
w
w o .
a Y 4 Q > Vy O, •.
� 5T. vQ
o > W ►- m X13.
J Cr Cr o o _.,
R o a cr, W. 48th" S T:. Y
Z. HOLLYW000 > a RD. o°
14. Cr
ORCHARD �-
L A. 8L VD. a uj
20 W; ' 49th
f ST,
> >
L
z pss W 5 s t N .58
-• o
r Cr Cr a a
Y Cr J z "
`�' o o a_ a
X m U
52nd.
PROPOSED 3
ST.
_
AUTOMOTIVE 100
STORE SITE E
z az C
2 .
�` 4 Cr
o_ 21: EDE R ST.
Cf 'Cr.
cf� .►o�� ly ,..,
a
VER MONT
H
.
- NZ-f-
ST.
Y
ga
cc J WOOD
�Z
LA.
Q- W_ Q
> W
w
w o .
a Y 4 Q > Vy O, •.
� 5T. vQ
o > W ►- m X13.
J Cr Cr o o _.,
R o a cr, W. 48th" S T:. Y
Z. HOLLYW000 > a RD. o°
14. Cr
ORCHARD �-
L A. 8L VD. a uj
20 W; ' 49th
f ST,
> >
L
z pss W 5 s t N .58
-• o
r Cr Cr a a
Y Cr J z "
`�' o o a_ a
X m U
52nd.
PROPOSED 3
ST.
_
AUTOMOTIVE 100
STORE SITE E
z az C
2 .
�` 4 Cr
o_ 21: EDE R ST.
Cf 'Cr.
cf� .►o�� ly ,..,
May 1993
WINDSOR��
; Rll v- w z)ur
158
AVE.
Woo
KENT '
•
W.
o
90
0 22. 56th ST.
a
>
a
0
8R A
23. YVONNE
9��
>
Z
>
Melody TER.
f -P4RK�
a
N
a
24
RD,
W.
[7tj
�,
T. 23. Lake >
_
SITE
°
W
PROPOSED
gAth
Location of.
CM OF
EDIN A
Proposed /Expected
a
�'
Redevelopment Sites
TER.
May 1993
W > >1.
• ' >
o,
GRID GE
- i
o o W
z -�
Q a a J
.� O X o kj
z wOO`0 a1p�( a `o'' ; o
N o a 16. �` P
� C
Q' o� n17
W � 18.
_ Q
\
Woo
OA
•
MORNINGSIDE
o
90
>
a
>
a
0
8R A
4
/2
ST.
Z
s,
SITE
N
EXPECTED
W
Y
REDEVELOPMENT
SUNNY
SITE
a
W
PROPOSED
gAth
Lake RAINBOW FOODS '
SITE
a
W > >1.
• ' >
o,
GRID GE
- i
o o W
z -�
Q a a J
.� O X o kj
z wOO`0 a1p�( a `o'' ; o
N o a 16. �` P
� C
Q' o� n17
W � 18.
_ Q
29. AvrL..
Woo
OA
PROPOSED
LA•
BF
.REGIS
WOO
DALE
F
REDEVELOPMENT
0*
SITE
N
EXPECTED
REDEVELOPMENT
w
SITE
a
W
PROPOSED
Lake RAINBOW FOODS '
SITE
a
W.
Harvey GOLF
TER.
LAKEViEW
DR.
i
uJ
OAK
O
DR.
"
c
W.
55
LEX INGTON
wIN D
ST.
z
IVE
W.
0 56
th
�° a
'
-)
PL
a
a
TOWER
r ST.
S0. VIEW LA.
WOODLAND
s
a�
conclusions of the traffic analyses are then used to develop appropriate
roadway and/or traffic control improvement recommendations which will
ensure adequate access and minimize traffic impacts and congestion within
the Grandview area.
RIMI 4
EXISTING CONDITIONS
EXISTING LAND USES
The Grandview area is currently anchored by the existing Jerry's Foods
grocery store and some ancillary retail shops, which are oriented towards
Vernon Avenue (Figure 3). The other main traffic generators within the
area include the Super - America and Amoco service stations/stores located
in the northeastern and southeastern quadrants of the Vernon Avenue/Link
Road intersection, respectively.
The existing land uses on the proposed and expected redevelopment
parcels are also shown in Figure 3. The data indicate that:
• The proposed Rainbow Foods development site currently contains
two industrial -type buildings, Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil. The
Lewis Engineering Building is currently occupied by a Unocal store.
• The Regis redevelopment area currently contains two buildings
owned and operated by the Regis Corporation, an office building and
a building used for shipping and receiving.
• The area between the existing Jerry's Foods store and Eden Avenue
currently contains the Edina schools bus garage, a. car wash and a
medical clinic.
• The future automotive store site is currently vacant. However, the
site was recently occupied by a gas station, which has since been
razed.
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
The existing transportation system in the Grandview area is shown in
Figure 4. The roadways which provide primary access to the area are
listed in Table 1, below, along with the functional classification,
responsible governmental agency, and current design features.
#IMI 5
Intmachm OIVA
a Jtfry
5
J
P
Jert�/s
Foods
i
0
Car
Inlc wa!
L
SA
Amoco
e dins Lewis
tnla En9•
e�eelc
Design Tsc
7 a Kunr
J 0°
I
CMOF
EDINA
May 1993
Eden
Cl
Whoa 0�'
V �
Oi
i
i,
i
y
V u u . j
mr-In
al�
Existing
Site Conditions
Interlachen Blvd. 1__i ,� u
nr�n
a1
❑ Jl�y '' O
9 5hlpping
Receiving
C
J �
No. cease
' �y
JRemy
�. ✓
City of Bldg
Edins
FUMIC
J 'S EF= Wort
Acce88 Nbrkri
Car ;
Ink
Wash Edins i
❑
Due GA ;
Due nage i
Amoco ;
t'y Lewis ❑
o mkMTC Eng.
Bumm
Oie` Only ;
J ern T5C
Office Kunz �
on
Eden
Arcle � Aur �
ORice � Greca
yyti� ; Church
Legend:
EDINA
May 1 993
Existing
Roadway
System.
Traffic Signal
® '\ %'V
off.
Aw
®�
TABLE 1
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
Functional Roadway Current Design
Roadway Classification Jurisdiction Features
TH 100
Vern Avenue
Eden Avenue
Link Road
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Collector
Mn/DOT
Hennepin County
City of Edina/
MSA-- -- - -
City of Edina/
MSA.
4-Lane Freeway
4-Lane Divided
2 -Lane
2 -Lane
Interlachen Blvd. Minor Arterial
Hennepin County
2 -Lane
Arcadia Avenue Collector
City of Edina
2 -Lane .
Grange Road/
City of Edina
2 -Lane
Wilson Road
Sherwood Road
City of Edina
2 -Lane
Regional access is .provided by TH 100. Subregional access is provided
via Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. Local access is provided
via. Eden Avenue, Link Road, Arcadia Avenue, Grange Road/Wilson Road
and Sherwood Road.
The major or "key" intersections within the Grandview area are shown in
Figure 5 and listed below.
• Vernon Avenue/Link Road
• Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods South Access
• Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North Access
• Vernon AvenuelInterlachen Boulevard
• Vernon AvenuefM 100 Southbound Ramps
• 50th Street/Grange Road
• Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road
• Eden Avenue/Arcadia Avenue
• Eden Avenue/Wilson Road
The existing approach geometrics and traffic control at each of these nine
key intersections is shown in Figure 6. The data indicate that four of these
key intersection locations (the Vernon Avenue intersections with Link
Road, Interlachen Boulevard, the TH 100 Southbound Ramps and Grange
Road) are currently controlled by traffic signals and two locations are
currently four -way stop - controlled (the Eden Avenue intersections with
Arcadia Avenue and Grange/Wilson Road). The remaining "key"
intersections are controlled by stop signs on the minor street approaches.
01MI 8
►rrterladm Blvd. u u U
;
;
-
5hlpping l a
� Recdving
J c
;
J
' Y
imp Q
u City of ce
Jere
Edina ��'
f
Fwds r e J
; Wbrke
m
� O
tnk
Wash .
a co.
1 Edlna
SholGarage ;
SA '
Elt' dlna Lewte ;
,�Or /`Olnw Ems'
C
Mr.J fkeyn
TSC
Offi OFR ,
ce Kunz �
1 OA i
J
Eden �
Arch Our Lacb
' of Grace
�M i Church
till"
4
Via►A,m
e
v
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BRW, Inc., conducted turning movement traffic counts at each of the nine
"key" intersection locations from 4 :00 to 6:30 p.m. during April of 1993.
The data indicated that the PM peak hour at most of these intersections
currently occurs from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m.. The PM peak hour turning
movement traffic volumes at each of the nine key intersection locations are
shown in Figure 6.
The existing - average daily traffic -(ADT) volumes on the primary roadways
within the Grandview area are shown in Figure 7. The data indicate that
the existing ADT volumes on Vernon Avenue south of Link Road and on
Eden Avenue west of Arcadia Avenue are approximately 14,500 vehicles
per day (vpd) and 6,500 vpd, respectively.
11MI 10
_.. A—._ .
b
11
r
#1
�7
l�
Fy' �!� � v E
419 NAV
.S 4'j9
moo-.
r O �
Nm�
#4
!1
#7
Legend:
O Traffic Signal
,: Stop Sign
Source: Traffic =rft and field A-
obsmations, April 1993, BRW, Inc
1993.
i
i
lie
#2
o �
r r � .-
e0o 610
190
480
24
W �
D
a } \
N b m
Jt� vo
A�!*
20
29
#8
Existing PM Peak Hour
°""°� Traffic Conditions at
E D I NA -Key Intersections
65
A�, North
#3 Access
R VERNON AVE
•— ie0
78
ns 0
100
o s
0j
#6
�' S5
EVEN AVE V
c
#9
Irlt'erfachen Blvd.
j
O '
a
5
J
JRamp
Jen�le '
Foods
i
0
Car
Ink Edina
0
�JGt'Ipol6
BIM Gan�ge
5A
`A
.. poi.
I
Amoco
e� dine LaNe '
Ooffice �eM ;
J �
�C6 Kurtz I
on ;
boo
�a
U
;
atite
orflce ;
u
Whee. 4k,- ;
N °r6
A '
Source. MIy/Dot 1990 Traffic Flow Maps &
April 1993 Hose Counts by City of Edina.
cm OF
EDINA
AAay 1993
L-j u u
r-1 7-1 r-1
;
; CltyoF
� Edtna
; FLWfr.
; Nbrke
IL
Existing
Average Daily
Traffic Volumes
4�
d
PLANNED ROADWAY SYSTEM
Discussions with the City of Edina, Hennepin County and Mn/DOT _
indicate that [here are no major roadway or traffic control improvements
currently planned for the Grandview area. The Vernon Avenue/Interlachen
Boulevard intersection is currently under construction to replace the traffic
signal equipment. However, there will be no geometric or traffic control
changes.
ras» 13
PROPOSED/EXPECTED CONDITIONS
Site plans have been submitted to the City of Edina for three of the four
previously identified redevelopment sites within - the- Grandview area.
These proposed redevelopments are shown in Figure 8 and summarized in
the following paragraphs.
Area Southeast of the Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road Intersection
• Raze the two existing on -site buildings.
• Construct a 65,900 -square-foot Rainbow Foods grocery store.
• Construct a 4,800 - square -foot fast -food restaurant.
Area Southwest of the Vernon Avenue/TH 100 Southbound
Ramos Intersections
• Replace Regis Corporation office (approximately 9,000 square feet)
with funeral home land use.
• Renovate the existing Regis Corporation Shipping/Receiving building
(approximately 34,120 square feet) to a 17,150 -square-foot building
with four retail- oriented land uses; a 3,700 -square-foot restaurant, a
8,150 -square-foot drugstore, a 1,600 -square-foot hair salon and
3,700 square feet of other retail.
• Construct a new 6,400 -square-foot building north of the existing
Regis Corporation Shipping/Receiving building to be used as a video
store.
Automotive Service/Store
• Construct an automotive service store of approximately 7,600 square
feet which provides ten service bays.
Recent redevelopment plans have not been received for the area between
the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store and Eden Avenue, which is now
occupied by the school bus garage. However, redevelopment of this site
is envisioned by the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan. For analysis
•1MI 14
t
,
,
Interlachen Blvr1 L u
,
,
iirry y
■-° deo
IStoro
Murplr�'s
Auto �
- - - n
-' Retell Sho e
' S C o
$ L
R e II
o�
J�
u r-
rke
; J
market
,
,
Raul
Fbad
,
goo
iurant I
alnbow ,
=do .
Our LAW
,
L, ofGrea
a,�ti
o;
moo,
purposes, the site plan proposed in the 1990 Grandview Area Traffic Study
Uodate was assumed for this area. This redevelopment proposal would
include razing the existing Edina school bus garage, car wash and medical
clinic buildings and constructing a 15,000- square -foot supermarket
expansion'of Jerry's Foods, 8,620 square feet of other retail and 61,120
square feet of office space.
.IWI 16
TRIP GENERATION
The expected trip generation to and from a site is a function of the size
and- character of the - developments The projected- number of vehicular trips
to /from each of the four redevelopment'sites were calculated by using the
national average trip rates documented in the 1987 and 1991 Trip
Generation Manuals published -by -the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(TTE). A summary of the estimated traffic generation to and from the
proposed and expected redevelopment sites within the Grandview area are
shown in Table 2. The data indicate that the redevelopment of the four
sites, with land uses as identified in Figure 8 and intensities as noted in
Table 2, would be expected to generate approximately 15,860 vehicle trips,
including 1,218 trips during the PM peak hour.
These generation projections provide a worst -case estimate of the actual
number of new trips that would be imparted to the adjacent roadway
system because these projections:
1. Do not account for internal or linked trip - making. Internal trip -
making occurs when trips to two or more land uses within a site are
combined into a single multi- purpose trip.
2. Do not account for passerby trips. Passerby trips are defined as trips
that currently use the street that would have passed by without the
development. The TTE Trip Generation Manual estimates that
passerby trip percentages for smaller retail land uses range from 20
to 50 percent.
3. Assume that the proposed Rainbow Foods store will generate trips at
the same rates as a typical grocery store or supermarket.
The Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact Study prepared by Barton -
Aschman Associates, Inc., in March of 1993, documented expected
trip rates for the proposed Rainbow Foods store of 65.6 ADT, 2.32
PM peak hour inbound and 2.52 PM peak hour outbound. These
rates were based on actual sales information from three other similar
Rainbow Foods stores within the Metropolitan area.
•�� 17
TABLE 2
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2
EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 RATES # TRIPS
iLAND -------------- - - - - -- ----=--------- - - - - -- i
.PARCEL, USE UNIT QUANTITY ADT PM IN. PM OUT ADT PM IN PM OUT
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
INORTH SUPERMARKET S.F. 15,000. 125.5 4.50 4.32 1880 6B 65 i
IOF RETAIL S.F. 8,620. ..40.7' 2.40 2.40 350 21 21
(EDEN AVE. OFFICE S.F. 61,120. 15.5 0.33 1.80 950 20 110
I SUBTOTAL S.F. 84,740. - - 3190 109 196
.SOUTH RAINBOW FOODS S.F. 65,900. 125.5? 4.50 4.32 8270 297 285 i
�1,
.OF FAST -FOOD REST. S.F. 4,800. 632:1 19.00. 17.50 3 30 91 84
IEDEN.AVE. SUBTOTAL S.F. 70,700. - - - 11 300) 388 369
(REGIS VIDEO STORE S.F. 6,400. 40.7 2.40 2.40
!CORPORATION RESTAURANT S.F. 3,700. 40.7 2.40 2.40J
!AREA DRUGSTORE S.F. 8,150. 40.7 2.40 2.40 I
I HAIR STYLING S.F. 1,600. 40.7 2.40 2.40 !
1 OTHER RETAIL S.F. 3,700. 40.7 2.40 2.40 !
1 SUBTOTAL RETAIL S.F. 23,550. 40.7 2.40 2.40 960 57 57 !
! FUNERAL HOME # ## S.F. 9,000. 7.7 0.34 0.30 70 4 3
SUBTOTAL S.F. 32,550. - - - 1030. 61 60 !
'OTHER MURPHY'S SERVICE 10 35 ## 1.46 2.01 350 15 20
!AREAS AUTOMOTIVE BAYS i
i
1-------------------------------------------- - --------------------- ------------------------------------
.
TOTAL -- - - - - - -- -- S- F - - - - -- 235,B 25------------------------- - - - - -- -15860 .. 573 645
# Rates based on ITE (Institute of Transporation Engineers) .\
Trip Generation Manual (1987 & 1991 Editions). �•0LQ�d
Rainbow Foods rates based on March 1993 Barton- Aschman
Traffic Impact Study. �.
# #-Estimated assuming PM peak hour traffic is 10 % of ADT.
# ## Estimated assuming church rates.
In addition, a 1988 TTE Journal article entitled, "Trip Generation
Rates For Different Types of Grocery Stores" indicated that
warehouse -type stores characterized by limited services, 24 -hour
operations and bulk purchasing exhibit lower trip rates (80.0 ADT,
3.4 PM inbound and 3.5 PM outbound) than those published in the
TTE Trio Generation Manual (see Appendix).
BRW, Inc., agrees that the limited services (bag and carry your own
groceries) and interior character (warehouse) of a typical Rainbow
Foods store result in a reduced attraction rate compared to typical
full service- supermarkets, -as patrons- visit- these -type's-of-stores-less-
often but spend more time and money per trip than at a typical
supermarket.
However, although BRW may support the use of reduced rates to
those documented in the 1988 TTE Journal study, there is no
independent data to support the use of the rates used in the Barton -
Aschman report.
4. Assume that the area southeast of the Eden Avenue/Sherwood Road
intersection will develop with the currently proposed Rainbow Foods
and fast -food restaurant land uses.
This area has been analyzed with different land use alternatives in
each of the two previous Grandview Area Traffic Studies. In
addition to the current Rainbow Foods development proposal, this
area is also currently being considered for medium density residential
development or office/ office- showroom development. The
comparative trip generation characteristics of these three land use
alternatives is documented in Table 3. The data indicate that the
development of this area with the proposed Rainbow Foods store and
fast -food restaurant would result in substantially more vehicle trips
than the other land use alternatives.
The trip generation analysis is also conservative in that it does not
account for trips generated by the existing facilities that are to be
razed in order for the redevelopment of these sites to occur.
However, the existing vehicle trip generation to and from these
industrial facilities is assumed to be small.
These factors, when combined, should result in a very conservative
estimate of the vehicular trip generation to and from the
redevelopment areas and the most straightforward method of analysis.
If the traffic analyses indicate that the resulting conservative traffic
forecasts can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway
system, then any reduced forecasts caused by any combination of
internal trips, passerby trips, lower Rainbow Foods trip rates and/or
NIWI 19
TABLE 3
(J�'
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY
UPDATE #2
JJ
EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION OF PROPOSED
----------------------------------- ------------------------------------=------
DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF
EDEN AVENUE
/�
:1
1
RATES
*
-- - -----------------=----
TRIPS
;
f LAND
f
(ALTERNATIVE USE UNIT.
QUANTITY
ADT -
PM IN
PM OUT
AD T
PM IN
PM OUT
1
f---------------------=---=---------------------------------------------------------------------
- -- - --
1
f
1 RAINBOW FOODS S.F.
65,900.
125.5
4.50
4.32
8270
297
285
'
1
e #1 FAST -FOOD REST. S.F.
4,B00.
632.1
19.00
17.50
91
84
f
f SUBTOTAL S.F.
f
70,700.
`3030
` 1.1 0
T
388
369
f
1 #2 MEDIUM DENSITY D.U.
200
5.86
0.36
0.19
1180
72
38
1.
1 RESIDENTIAL
1
f
#3 OFFICE / OFFICE - S.F.
108,000.
11.8
0.25
1.36
1280
27
147
f
f...
1 SHOWROOM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------
;
9 Rates based on ITE (Institute of
Transporation
Engineers)
Trip.Generation Manual (1987.& 1991 Editions).
Rainbow Foods rates based on March 1993 Barton - Aschman
Traffic Impact Study. Office / Office- Showroom
trip rates
based on assuming 50/50 mix of office and industrial.
j
1
012831
the development of the area southeast of the Eden Avenue/Sherwood .
Road intersection with one of the other land use alternatives could
also be adequately accommodated.
21
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The expected directional distribution of site - generated trips to and from the
- proposed Rainbow .- Foods- . store -documented -in -the March _1993_ Rainbow
Foods Traffic Impact Study (prepared by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc.)
was based on a market study of this area. The market study indicated that
37 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive from the east on Eden and
Vernon Avenues, 28 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive via TH
100 and 20 percent of the patrons are expected to arrive from the
southwest on Vernon Avenue (Table 4).
The expected directional orientation of site - generated trips to and from the
Grandview area documented in the 1984 and 1990 Grandview Area Traffic
Studies (prepared by BRW, Inc.) was based on the Metropolitan Council's
Regional Travel Model, which assumed land uses for this area that are
more regional in nature (office, industrial, residential) than a supermarket
land use. This was consistent with the previous Grandview area
redevelopment scenarios as most consisted of office, office/showroom or
residential redevelopments. This distribution assumes that 10 percent of
the patrons arrive from the east via Eden and Vernon Avenues, 50 percent
of the patrons arrive via TH 100 and 25 percent of the patrons arrive from
the southwest on Vernon Avenue (Table 4).
Since most of the proposed redevelopment will consist of retail- oriented
land uses with more localized market areas, it is reasonable to assume that
traffic to and from these redevelopment areas via TH 100 will be less than
the 50 percent previously assumed in the 1984 and 1990 Grandview Area
Traffic Studies. Therefore, a higher percentage of traffic to and from these
sites is expected from the east and/or west.
While the market study estimates a higher percentage of site trips to and
from the east on Eden and Vernon Avenues, the logical reasoning for this
could not be subjectively explained. Therefore, a vehicle trace study was
conducted by BRW, Inc:, in order to estimate the future distribution of
trips to and from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other retail -
oriented redevelopment sites. This study was based on the assumption that
the future directional orientation of trips to and from the proposed
Rainbow Foods store would be similar to the existing distribution to and
from the Jerry's Foods store.
•IMI 22
TABLE 4
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I i ESTIMATED DIRECTIONAL PERCENTAGES I
I1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -1
I I Vernon Ave. Wilson Rd. Arcadia Ave. I
1 (Vernon Ave. Interlachen TH 100 TH 100 & Eden Ave. (E. Fr. Rd.) (W. Fr. Rd.) Sherwood Rd. 1
ISOURCE Ito SW Blvd. to north to south to east to south to south to south TOTAL i
11984 & 1990 Grandview i
iArea Traffic Studies 1 25.0 % 15.0 % 30.0 % 20.0 % 10.0 Y. 0.0 % 0.01% 0.0 % 100.0 % I
I.(BRW Inc.) # I i
2 a 1
iRainbow Foods Traffic i
(Study - March 1993 1 20.0 % 15.0.% 10.0 % 18.0 Y. 37.0 Y. 0.0 Y. 0.0 Y% 0.0 % 100.0 % I
1(Barton- Aschman).
I i
i Jerry' s Foods Exiting i
iTraffic Trace Study 1 47.0 % 15.0 % - 6.0- .-X.,. 10.0 -X- 13.0 / 1.0 % 5.0,% 3.0 % 100.0 % I
Apri l 1993
I(BRW, Inc.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------
# Based on Regional Travel Model for Twin Cities (Mn /DOT & Met Council).
## Based on Market Analysis documented in the March. - 1993 Rainbow Foods:Traffic.Study.
# ## Based on a traffic count conducted by BRW, Inc.
Y
TABLE 4
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I i ESTIMATED DIRECTIONAL PERCENTAGES I
I1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -1
I I Vernon Ave. Wilson Rd. Arcadia Ave. I
1 (Vernon Ave. Interlachen TH 100 TH 100 & Eden Ave. (E. Fr. Rd.) (W. Fr. Rd.) Sherwood Rd. 1
ISOURCE Ito SW Blvd. to north to south to east to south to south to south TOTAL i
11984 & 1990 Grandview i
iArea Traffic Studies 1 25.0 % 15.0 % 30.0 % 20.0 % 10.0 Y. 0.0 % 0.01% 0.0 % 100.0 % I
I.(BRW Inc.) # I i
2 a 1
iRainbow Foods Traffic i
(Study - March 1993 1 20.0 % 15.0.% 10.0 % 18.0 Y. 37.0 Y. 0.0 Y. 0.0 Y% 0.0 % 100.0 % I
1(Barton- Aschman).
I i
i Jerry' s Foods Exiting i
iTraffic Trace Study 1 47.0 % 15.0 % - 6.0- .-X.,. 10.0 -X- 13.0 / 1.0 % 5.0,% 3.0 % 100.0 % I
Apri l 1993
I(BRW, Inc.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------
# Based on Regional Travel Model for Twin Cities (Mn /DOT & Met Council).
## Based on Market Analysis documented in the March. - 1993 Rainbow Foods:Traffic.Study.
# ## Based on a traffic count conducted by BRW, Inc.
I
The vehicle trace study was conducted by following exiting Jerry's Foods
patrons to the outer limits of the study area and denoting which roadway
the patron had used to exit the study area. The trace study was conducted
on April 29 and 30 during the PM peak period and consisted of 147
observations. The results of the vehicle trace study are documented in
Table 4.
The data indicate that the existing. PM peak hour directional orientation of
trips < from Jerry's Foods is significantly higher to the southwest along
Vernon Avenue and significantly lower to the east along Eden and Vernon -
Avenues than -the estimated- market - study - distribution. - If-- the proposed
Rainbow Foods store: exhibits a. distribution similar to the existing Jerry's
Foods store, the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection would be more
heavily utilized than indicated in the Barton- Aschman report.
However, since Jerry's Foods and Rainbow Foods provide different levels
of service (i.e., . price, free- bagging versus self - bagging, carry-out versus
carry your own, etc.), it is difficult to disregard the market study
distribution. Therefore, although the trace study distribution was used to
distribute the site - generated traffic volumes and to prepare the traffic
forecasts, the impact differences of using the market study distribution for
the Rainbow Foods store and the previous studies distribution for the other
land -use alternatives for the area south of Eden Avenue were also
analyzed.
Simi 24
SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME
FORECASTS
The expected PM peak hour trips to and from the four future
redevelopment areas within the Grandview area were assigned to the
surrounding roadway system based on the directional orientation displayed
in Figure 9 and logical and minimum travel time paths. These site-
generated PM peak hour traffic volume forecasts for each of the key
intersection locations are illustrated in Figure 10.
I
I
ri�i 25
.1
6%
►nterfache" Blvd LLu u u
n r-ir -1
15% '
a
jt r y
• Storrs
0
°3u�i .
Au 2 f 1 •
1 ;Befall Sh a . J
C
r
�
Ramp a U
�
u ! Cttyof
4 Edlne 61dg.
Public J
Footle ; Wy*6
ro '
r• --
upsr
market
Retal '
! 5A ( �. •,
i
•'
Amoco I ;
Fines Food E
tnReetaurant I ,
;F
Note: Assumes no passby trips.
Source: Vehicle Trace study of Jerry's
Foods Traffic, BRW,Inc., April 1993.
May 1993
/1
I / ,
/i Our Lacbr
� of Gnxe
•�,
(lurch
S'
n'
5%
Expected Directional Distribution
C"OF of Retail Traffic
E D I NA
within Grandview Area
13%
\ - •�rnarr /{yam iCR 15e
J �
Ave.
10%
r,
i/
e
(®
0
0�
i1
0
0
O�
i
#1 ♦e LPG
c$` yERNO N
r �
0�
W
Ro
m
#4
°ate
J
�c
Coe
#7
1�
f r o
i V
#2,
L)
007/4
Q -•
w
"�1914 �► �
30
w
r Z++
VOW }�► Rw10910 0
0 01,
10910/•010
#8
°Of f
0
�` NoAh
#3
do
�R o
VERNON AVE
r
.0-0/617/2
r �0
0/6/132
0/0/0/1
CP
#6
Jr T �511An'0
0
r ai
2jo '� s
EDENAVE. M o,•o
,o
0
#9
Legend: CL
00 /00 /00 /00 Rainbow & Fast Food Restaurant Redevelopment/ 3W 9 Q
Regis Redevelopment/ E • 0 e n
Car Wash,Bus Garage Redevelopment/ ' I °I
Murphy Automotive < OJ
T
0 Traffic Signal 0/0/24/0
0/9/010
t Stop Sign 0/02410 121/010/0
0/9/0/0
A 26910/0/0 EDEN AVE
Coe
Site-Generated PM Peak Hour
g ma
`m'°� Traffic Forecasts at #'! 0 SIS
E D LNA. Key Intersections
May 1 993
POST- REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC
FORECASTS
Post- redevelopment traffic volume forecasts were prepared - in order- to
analyze the traffic impacts that the proposed redevelopment will have on
the adjacent roadway system. Two sets of forecasts, were prepared;. one
with only the proposed Rainbow Foods development for comparison
purposes with the Barton - Aschman report (Figure 11) and one with all four
sites redeveloped (Figure 12). These forecasts consist of the existing
traffic volumes plus the expected traffic generation to /from the proposed
development(s) and are prepared for use in intersection capacity analyses,
in geometric design or redesign of streets and intersections, and in
establishment of appropriate traffic control devices.
SIMI 28
�?dt
O
6�t
#1 0
N wo
Fy > yEi.Np
+81
r 0 a
Nmb
l � �
#4
9�
�0
�0
Off
#7
#2
b j
�RNON r 810
A �
O ~
48x(81 �.
C, g i
tu
o z l 1 to
#5
e } \
0
C* Vr i
t
EpENT ,+ 941 W1 941
4,
zol8 3106
#8
Legend:
00
Total Traffic
(00)
Rainbow Foods & Fast-Food
Restaurant Development Component
O
Traffic Signal.
Stop Sign
Source: Rainbow Foods Traffic Impact
Study, March 1993, Barton- Aschman.
EDINA
1
Post Rainbow Foods Development
PM Peak HourTraffic Forecasts
at Key Intersections
r�
Jerry's
6 North
#3 Access
Z
_�X, VERNON AVE
10-- 780
'T8
775-1
i
100
N
o � V
#6
r 5+ 1
EpEN AVS M � � w
a �
o
z
A�
#9
CL
�W
ENO
5
,�. o00
0
289
0 121(121)
299
289(289) EDEN AVE
1
m
r,° 3
ar $ �a
CIA
#10 R
0� \
S �
.�' tio1f� d��ser rf
4�
� r
#1
CYF'� s�`► .� 5 �s41
3621 1.
1 a iiiai
m
#4
9�
�o�o
#7
Legend:
00 Total Traffic
(00) Redevelopment
Generated
O Traffic Signal
A Stop Sign
1991
#2
d �' i LL,
�a00 �- 627(174
n
O i
tTtl51�'°
20101'x► Qr �. � g
W j
4 e
pr
ee
f
71-
e vuf P��1�
EOE 337111 x'210 ;1
AvE � 41101
2g(A 33918912'
Soo
se�,cb
#8
_ Post Redevelopment PM
E D I NA Peak HourTraffic Forecasts
at Key Intersections
Oy
,1.Ry�s
6�� North
#3 Access
V4
VERNON AVE
r
j ' 6(0)
796(21)— O -►
101(1) -+
1
�o A, 49 do
c°` l
#6
�- 55101
EDEN AVE r
7r �
L
�o
#9
Em °° �..�
�� Q eta
27W91
24(24 121(121)
269(269 EDEN AVE
Z
m
Nr
161 W
#1O LL1.
TRAFFIC ANALYSES
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
A capacity analysis is an established method of objectively measuring
quality of traffic flow through an intersection or along. a segment of
- roadway. The intersection analysis is based on the fact that there is a
maximum number of vehicles which can be accommodated by each lane
approaching the intersection. This maximum number is then modified to
take into account such limiting factors as the type of traffic signal
operation, the intersection geometry, and the amount of turning traffic.
The calculated capacity is then compared to either the existing or forecast
peak hour volumes. The relationship between these values gives an
indication of the quality of traffic flow. If the existing or forecast volumes
are significantly less than the calculated capacity, the quality of traffic flow
should be very good, with little or no congestion at the intersection.
However, as the volume of traffic through the intersection approaches
capacity, the quality of traffic flow drops and the amount of congestion
and delay increases.
Qualitatively speaking, the various levels of traffic flow through an
intersection can be described as follows:
Level of Service A - Light traffic, short stable queues during red signal
phase, and no delay.
Level of Service B - Moderate traffic, stable queues, little delay.
Level of Service C - Moderate heavy traffic, moderately long but stable
queues during red signal phase, moderate but acceptable delay.
Level of Service D - Heavy traffic, long unstable queues, delays
sometimes' become excessive.
Level of Service E - Heavy flow, long queues, and excessive delays.
Level of Service F - Heavily congested traffic conditions. Traffic demand
greater than capacity.
•12DI 31
In large metropolitan areas such as the Twin Cities, Level of Service D is
usually recommended for urban intersection design as it is considered to
reflect the minimum acceptable : quality of traffic flow; and Level of
Service E is considered to be the actual capacity of the intersection.
Capacity analyses were conducted to determine the existing and post -
redevelopment levels of traffic operations during the PM peak hour at the
key intersection locations. The capacity analyses were conducted by using
the Operations Method outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual
(HCM), the current PM: peak hour traffic signal timing at each of the
existing signalized - locations and the existing geometrics and - control.- The
following listing summarizes the capacity analyses that were conducted:
Table 5 - Existing PM peak. hour
Table 6 - Rainbow Foods Development with market study distribution
Table 7 - Rainbow Foods Development with trace study distribution
Table 8 - All Redevelopment with market study distribution
Table 9 - All Redevelopment with trace study distribution
The data indicate that:
The left - turning movements from the existing Jerry's Foods
driveways onto southbound Vernon Avenue currently operate
unacceptably, level of service (LOS) "E" and "F ", and are expected
to continue to decline further (i.e., increased congestion) in the future
with or without the proposed Rainbow Foods development and with
either the trace study or market study distribution.
However, recent field observations of these intersections during the
PM peak hour indicate that the existing traffic signals along Vernon
Avenue at Link Road and Interlachen Boulevard create enough gaps
in the Vernon Avenue traffic stream to allow left- turning movements
from these driveways to be made without excessive delays.
In addition, the internal circulation within this area allows drivers
who can't get out at the Jerry's Foods access locations the option of
diverting to Interlachen Boulevard or Link Road.
• The Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection currently operates at an
acceptable level (LOS B) and will continue to operate at a high level
following the Rainbow Foods development and the development of
the other three redevelopment sites with either the trace study or
market.study distributions. Although the westbound to southbound
left- turning traffic volume and the northbound to eastbound right
turning traffic volume will be noticeably greater under the trace study
distribution, the level of operations at the intersection will only drop
to LOS C, which is still acceptable.
•EMI 32
TABLE.- 5
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC
STUDY UPDATE #2
EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE
PM
----------------------------
PEAK
HOUR LEVELS OF
- -------------
SERVICE
UNSIGNALIZED
SIGNALIZED
MAJOR
MINOR STREET
INT.
OR
STREET
--------------------
# INTERSECTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTROL
4 -WAY STOP
LEFT
LEFT THRU
RIGHT
1 VERNON AVE. / LINK RD.
SIGNAL
B
2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F -
A
FOODS SOUTH ACCESS
3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
A
E D
A
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4 VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C
-
'. INTERLACHEN BLVD.
5 VERNON AVE. / TH 100
SIGNAL
B
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
b' 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD.
THRU /STOP
-
A
H - .......
A
8 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA.AVE.
4 -WAY STOP
B
-
- -
-
9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 -WAY STOP
B
-
- -
-
& Southbound left turn at.capacity.
TABLE b
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY.UPDATE. #2
LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ONLY
--------------------------------------------------------------
RAINBOW FOODS DEVELOPMENT
& WITH
MARKET STUDY
DISTRIBUTION
PM
---------------------------------
PEAK HOUR
- - - - -- --
LEVELS OF
- - - - - - - --
SERVICE
UNSIGNALIZED
- --
SIGNALIZED
----------------------------
MAJOR
MINOR STREET
INT.
OR
STREET
----------L---------
# INTERSECTION
CONTROL
4 -WAY STOP
LEFT
LEFT THRU
RIGHT
I VERNON AVE. / LINK RD.
SIGNAL
B
2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F -
A
FOODS SOUTH ACCESS
3 VERNON AVE. " / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F E
A
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4 VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C
INTERLACHEN BLVD.
5 VERNON AVE. / TH 100
SIGNAL
B
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD.
THRU /STOP
-
A
C _
A
9 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE.
4 -WAY STOP
C
9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD.
4 -WAY STOP
C
10 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
C C
A
RAINBOW WEST ACCESS
11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
C -
A
RAINBOW EAST ACCESS
#.Southbound left turn at capacity.
TABLE 7
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY. UPDATE #2
LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ONLY RAINBOW FOODS DEVELOPMENT & WITH TRACE STUDY DISTRIBUTION
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------
PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
----------------------------=------- - - - - --
UNSIGNALIZED
SIGNALIZED
MAJOR
MINOR STREET
INT.
OR
STREET
------=-------------
#
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION
CONTROL
4 -WAY STOP
LEFT
LEFT THRU
RIGHT
C)
1
VERNON AVE. / LINK RD.
SIGNAL
I
C
2
VERNON AVE../ JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F -
A
FOODS SOUTH ACCESS
3
VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
A
F E
A
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4
VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C
-
- -
-
INTERLACHEN BLVD.
5
VERNON. -AVE. / TH 100
SIGNAL
B
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS.
6
50TH ST. 1 GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
7
EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD.
THRU/STOP
-
A
D -
A
B
EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE.
4 -WAY STOP
B
9
EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD.
4 -WAY STOP
B
" 10
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
D -
A
RAINBOW WEST ACCESS
11
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
C -
A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAINBOW EAST 'ACCESS
�C Southbound left turn at capacity.
TABLE 8
i
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC
STUDY UPDATE #2
LEVELS OF- SERVICE.WITH ALL REDEV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INC. RAINBOW FOODS
& WITH
MARKET STUDY
DISTRIBUTION
PM
------------------------------------------
PEAK HOUR
LEVELS OF
SERVICE
UNSIGNALIZED
SIGNALIZED
-----------------------
MAJOR
MINOR STREET
- - - - --
INT.
OR
STREET
--------------------
# INTERSECTION
-------------------------------------------=-------------------------------------------
CONTROL
4 -WAY STOP
LEFT
LEFT THRU
RIGHT
i VERNON AVE. / LINK RD.
SIGNAL
C
-
- -
-
2 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
C
F -
A
FOODS SOUTH.ACCESS
3 VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F E
A
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4 VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C
-
INTERLACHEN BLVD.
5 VERNON AVE. / TH 104
SIGNAL
B
-
- -
-
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
6 50TH ST. / GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
7 EDEN AVE. / SHERWOOD RD.
THRU /STOP
-
A
C -
A
8 EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE.
4 -WAY STOP
C
-
- -
-
9 EDEN AVE. / WILSON R.D..
4 7WAY STOP
C
.10 .EDEN AVE.. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
C C
A
RAINBOW WEST ACCESS
11 EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A'
C -
A
RAINBOW EAST ACCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Southbound & eastbound left
turns at capacity.
TABLE 9
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC
STUDY UPDATE #2
LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH ALL REDEV.-INC. RAINBOW FOODS
------------------------------------ --------------------------------
& WITH
TRACE STUDY DISTRIBUTION
PM
-- - - -- ----------------
PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF
SERVICE
-----------------------------
UNSIGNALIZED
SIGNALIZED
MAJOR
MINOR STREET
INT.
OR
STREET
--------------------
#
-----------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------
INTERSECTION
CONTROL
4 -WAY STOP
LEFT
LEFT THRU
RIGHT
1
VERNON AVE.. /LINK RD.
SIGNAL
C
-
- -
-
2
VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
C
F -
A
FOODS SOUTH ACCESS
3
VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
B
F E
A
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4
VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C
-
- -
-
INTERLACHEN BLVD.
5
VERNON AVE. / TH 10.0
SIGNAL
B
-
- -
-
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
6
50TH ST. / GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
-N- AVE. / SHERWOOD RD.
THRU /STOP
-
A
D -
A
8
EDEN AVE. / ARCADIA AVE.
4 -WAY STOP
C
-
- -
-
9
EDEN AVE. / WILSON RD,
4 -WAY STOP.
C
-
- -
-
10
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
D B
A
RAINBOW WEST ACCESS
11
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
A
C -
A
RAINBOW EAST ACCESS
* Southbound & easthniinri left tiirn=
In addition, these post - redevelopment levels of service are consistent with
the levels documented in the Barton - Aschman traffic study for this
intersection.
• The Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently
operates at an acceptable level (LOS Q and is expected to continue
-to operate at this level through the post - redevelopment conditions
with either the trace or market study distribution. However, the
southbound left-turning movement from Interlachen to eastbound
Vernon Avenue currently operates at capacity. Following the
redevelopment of each of the four sites, both the southbound to
eastbound left - turning movement (permissive only) and the eastbound
to northbound left- turning movement (protected only) are expected
to operate at capacity.
• The left - turning movement from northbound Sherwood Road to
westbound Link Road currently operates at level of service "B" and
would be expected to continue -to operate at an acceptable level
through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace
(LOS D) or market study (LOS Q distributions. However, the traffic
queues from the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection will very
likely extend back beyond Sherwood Road. .
The existing four -way stop- controlled intersections along Eden
Avenue at Arcadia Avenue and Wilson Road currently operate with
little congestion (LOS B) during the PM peak hour and are expected
to continue to operate at reasonable levels (LOS Q during the post-
redevelopment. conditions under either the trace or market study
distributions. However, the intersections will operate better if site
traffic is oriented similar to the trace study distribution.
The left- turning movements from the proposed eastern and western
Rainbow Foods access drives off of Eden Avenue will operate
acceptably through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the
trace study or market study distributions. This is consistent with the
levels of operations documented in the Barton - Aschman report.
• The remaining key intersection locations currently operate at
acceptable levels and are expected to continue to operate acceptably
through the post - redevelopment conditions with either the trace or
market study distributions.
The redevelopment of the area south of Eden Avenue with one of the other
land use alternatives (medium density residential or office/office-
showroom) would not result in a significant change in the levels of traffic
operations of the key intersections within the Grandview area. However,
the site access intersections would likely operate at higher levels.
•IMI 38
SUNDAY MORNING CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The City of Edina requested that BRW, Inc., analyze the expected Sunday
morning traffic conditions along Eden Avenue following 'the completion
of the .Rainbow Foods store, particularly the possible traffic conflicts
between vehicles exiting the Our Lady of Grace Church and vehicles
oriented towards Rainbow Foods or Jerry's Foods. This analysis was
completed by preparing future post - redevelopment Sunday morning traffic
forecasts and conducting a capacity analysis of the existing church access
driveway onto Eden Avenue. These Sunday morning forecasts (see
Appendix) were prepared by adding existing Sunday morning volumes
(counted by the City of Edina in April 1993) to expected Rainbow Foods
Sunday morning traffic. The resulting capacity analysis indicates that
vehicles exiting the church access during the Peak Sunday morning exiting
period are expected to experience moderate delays (15 - 25 seconds/
average per vehicle). However, the magnitude of these delays should be
acceptable (LOS Q.
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
Since the installation of a traffic signal is considered as a mitigative
measure for reducing traffic congestion at unsignalized intersection
locations, traffic signal warrant analyses were conducted for both of the
Vernon Avenue intersections with existing Jerry's Foods. Traffic signal
warrant analyses determine if a traffic signal may be installed at an
intersection, although the installation of a traffic signal is not required just
because an intersection meets a signal warrant.
The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD)
specifies eleven traffic signal warrants, which, when met or exceeded,
indicate that traffic signal installation may be appropriate. However,
because of data constraints, only Warrant 11 (the Peak Hour Volume
Warrant) was used in this analysis.
The traffic signal warrant analyses for the Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods
South Access intersection and the Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods North
Access intersection are shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. The data
indicate that both of the intersections currently do' not meet traffic signal
warrants and that both intersections are not expected to meets signal
warrant-6following the proposed Rainbow Foods development. However,
the Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods South Access intersection is expected to
meet the Warrant 11 requirements for traffic signal installation following
the redevelopment of the area between Eden Avenue and existing Jerry 's
Foods, with or without the Rainbow Foods development.
01201 39
700
CM OF
99 EDINA
May 1993
0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods
South Access ( Key I nt. #2)
K
MAJOR STREET
Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
Warrant 11
Peak Hour Volume Warrant
* Note: 150 VPH Applies as the Lower
Threshold Volume for a Minor Street
Approach with two or More Lanes,
Legend:
O Existing PM Peak Hour
0 Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour
with Only Rainbow Development
Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour
with Rainbow Development and
Other Development
600
CL
s
500
LU
w
�
400
O<
300
CZ
G
=3
O
s
200
_47
100
CM OF
99 EDINA
May 1993
0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Vernon Avenue /Jerry's Foods
South Access ( Key I nt. #2)
K
MAJOR STREET
Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
Warrant 11
Peak Hour Volume Warrant
* Note: 150 VPH Applies as the Lower
Threshold Volume for a Minor Street
Approach with two or More Lanes,
Legend:
O Existing PM Peak Hour
0 Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour
with Only Rainbow Development
Post - Redevelopment PM Peak Hour
with Rainbow Development and
Other Development
� O
O <
C,9Y OF
49 EDINA
May 1993
Vernon Avenue/Jerry's Foods
North AGGeSS (Key Int. #3)
700 1
wil
M
Mot
300
200
WarrantNot
im
rpm
N
400 500 6000 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 10600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET
Total of both Approaches (VPH)
Warrant 11
Peak Hour Volume Warrant
Note. 1%rHA lies as the Lower
n ho ,, Volume a Minor Street
Approach wlth Two or More Lance.
Legend:
0
Existing FM Peak Hour
Post-Radevelopment FM Peak Hour
with Only Rainbow Development
Post - Redevelopment FM Peak Hour
Xevelopment;
with Kal6ow and
Other Development.
QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was conducted to determine the required storage
distances needed to adequately and safely accommodate vehicles waiting
during the red portion of the traffic signal cycle at the Vernon
Avenue/Link Road intersection. A summary of this analysis is
documented in Table 10. The data indicates that:
• The 200 feet of available left turn storage on the east approach of the
intersection _(i.e.,_ distance between Vernon_ Avenue and Sherwood
Road along Link Road) is expected to be exceeded during the PM
peak hour following the development of the area south. of Eden
Avenue. If all of the proposed redevelopment occurs (including the
Rainbow Foods store) and if this additional traffic is oriented similar
to the trace study distribution, then the required left - turning storage
for the westbound to southbound movement would be approximately
375 feet. This condition would block left - turning vehicles from
Sherwood Road during a large portion of the PM peak period and
may also block left turns in and out of the Super - America station if
vehicles in the queue do not provide an opening for these
movements.
• The 90 feet of available right turning storage between Vernon
Avenue and the Super - America access is also expected to be
exceeded during the PM peak hour following the development of the
area south of Eden Avenue.
• The 150 feet of available left - turning storage for the north approach
may also be exceeded periodically during the PM peak hour if the
area south of Eden Avenue develops with the proposed Rainbow
Foods store. If the area south of Eden Avenue develops with
officeloff ce- showroom or medium density residential then the
available left- turning storage would likely be adequate.
• The available 150 feet of right turning storage on the south approach
of the intersection is expected to be exceeded during the PM peak
hour if the Rainbow Foods store develops and if traffic to and from
the store is oriented similar to the trace study distribution.
As previously noted, the traffic forecasts used in the analysis are conser-
vative since they do not account for internal trips and passerby trips. If
these factors are considered, the required storage distances documented in
Table 10 could conservatively be reduced by 15 to 20 percent. However,
even with the reduced requirements, the available turn lane storage
distances on the east, north and south approaches will very likely still be
deficient.
MMI 42
TABLE 10
EDINA/GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE #2
REQUIRED STORAGE LENGTHS OF TURN LANES AT VERNON AVENUE/
LINK ROAD INTERSECTION
112831 43
North
South
East Approach
Approach
Approach
Scenario
Left Turn
Right Turn
Left Turn
Right Turn
Available
150'
150' (Est.)
200'
901*
....................................
.......................
All redevelopment (including
.......................
..... .......... ........
........ . . . ...... - ... .......... -
.............
.............
.............. ....... ...
........
. ......
.................... ............................
............ ........
......
.. .
...
........ ....
............... ...
........
Rainbow Foods) with trace study .........................................
................ .......... .
. .
..........
X .... ............
:3 .
... . ....
....... :1.': ............
............ ..... . . ...........
............
............
............ . ............. ......
............ ............
............
............
............. . . . . . . . ...... ......... . . . .
............ .. ... .
............ w...) .. ......
............ %.
...
. . . . ......
...... . . . .
.......... ... .
............. .
. .. .........................
............
.....
distribution
................................
. ....... ..
... . .. ... .. ........ .
.................
... ....
..
. .. . :.:.: ...
............. ......
............ .— . ..........
.............
............ . . . .....
............. :. , ,
. ... ............
............ ... ...........
............. ... . a .........
........... . ........... ....... ..
............. ........
.................... .......
............
...........
...........
- ...............
.................. ........ ......
........... . . . . . . . . . ............. .....
X.N. .... ........ ..
.... .....................
........
...........
.........................................
............................................. ..
.................................
...............
.......
Rainbow Foods with trace stud
...................... ........ ..
.... .
.. .........
... ....... M ...
................ ............................
..................... . .................
.......... : .................. .............
.. ........ ... ...................
.......... :":4
......... .. W. ................
............ .....
............ ............. ...
..............
..................
....... ...............
..................... 1 . ..........
... ........
2
................................................
distribution
. . ..............
................
. .................
- ..
. I. . .. . ... . ..............
. .... .. .
......... ..
..... .... .
...
............... .......
........................ ...............
. . ... .......
... .......
.........................
. . .............
.
. ..... ... . . .
. .. .....
..........
................. .... .... .....
..........
......... . ...........
............
............ .............
.............
............ X ............
... .. ..............
.............. .
Rainbow Foods with market
... .............
. ....
...............
150
......
. . ..........
......... .
........
. . ................
........................................
.......... .
. ........
..... ............ ..........
.... 5.
study distribution .....
.........
....... ..
y . ........
. .. ......
All redevelopment (including
130'
........
..................................................................................
. . ............... ... ...... ....
.... ....
.....
2-10 .... ....
. . .................
........
. .....
.....
................... ..................
.............
........... .......... ......... .... . .....
.... ........ . ... ...
?.. ............
....... . ..... . . .....
... . .. .... ................
........ ...... ...............
.... ........
...............................
officeloffice-showroom south of
(1001)
(80')
................. ... ..... .
..............
............ -:17T.Y.
. .
. ......
Eden Avenue) with previous
..........................................
.......................................
............
............... ........................
W...................... ........................
.................................
...........................................................................
I ...........................
..........................
.... . ........
....... ..... ... . .. ............
... ... ....................... ....
.... % ............... .. ...................
I ........... ............................
. ..... ................................
........
........................................
.... ...
Grandview studies distribution
. ........... . .... . .......... .
. ... .. .
.... .. .........
.....................................................
...............
....... ..................................
... ... .. .........
........... .........................
112831 43
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
Accident data was obtained from Hennepin County for the section of
Vernon Avenue (County Road 158) between Link Road and Arcadia
Avenue for the 1989 through 1991 time period. Analysis of this data
indicated the following:
There appears to be no current accident problems at the Vernon
Avenue intersections with Link Road, the Jerry's Foods access drives
and- Arcadia - Avenue..
There were twenty reported accidents at the Vernon Avenue)
Interlachen Boulevard intersection during this three year time period.
Based on 1990 average daily traffic volumes, this accident total
equates to an accident rate of 1.03 accidents per million vehicles
entering the intersection (Acc./MEV). This compares to a typical
signalized intersection accident rate of approximately 1.5 AccJMEV.
Therefore, the number of accidents at the intersection do not indicate
a problem.
However, further analysis of the type of accidents indicates that there have
been a relatively high percentage of left - turning accidents at the
intersection, particularly with vehicles travelling southwest on Vernon
Avenue turning left in front of oncoming traffic. A review of the
intersection geometrics suggests that the high percentage of left turn
accidents may be the result of the following factors:
The skewed angled of the intersection limits sight distance for
vehicles attempting this left- turning movement. Field observations
of the intersection indicate that drivers making this movement have
from 5 to 7 seconds of sight distance depending on the speed of the
approaching vehicles. This compares with the minimum acceptable
gap value of 5.5 seconds for this movement as documented in the
1985 Highway Caaacity Manual. Therefore, the existing sight
distance is marginal at best.
The approach lane for this movement is a combination left/through
lane. Therefore, left - turning drivers in this lane may be more
aggressive than usual (i.e., using inadequate gaps in the oncoming
traffic stream) because they are fearful of being struck from behind
by a through vehicle.
012931 44
GEOMETRIC ALTERNATIVES FOR
EDEN AVENUE
The existing Eden Avenue currently operates as a -two 36= foot =wide
roadway between Sherwood Road and the southbound TH 100 on -ramp.
Based on the current daily traffic. demand along Eden Avenue of
approximately 6,500 vehicles per day and the roadway segment level of
service guidelines shown in Figure 15, this segment of Eden Avenue
currently operates at LOS B.
However, following the completion of the Rainbow Foods development
and the redevelopment of the other three Grandview area sites, this
segment of Eden Avenue is expected to operate at unacceptable levels if
the current two -lane section is maintained. Therefore, the future
implementation of an alternative roadway section will be necessary.
Figure 15 shows the impacts of three different conservative analysis
scenarios on three and four lane roadways;
• One based on the traffic forecasts documented in this report which
assume no internal or passerby trips and ITE trip rates for the
proposed Rainbow Foods store (very conservative).
• One based the assumption that there will be a 20 percent reduction
in generated trips due to internal and passerby trips (less
conservative).
• One based on the Rainbow Foods trip rates documented in the
Barton- Aschman report and the assumption that there will be a 20
percent reduction in generated trips due to internal and passerby trips
(least conservative).
For the purposes of this analysis, it was considered appropriate to utilize
the "least conservative" numbers. The data indicate that the
implementation of a three -lane Eden Avenue with a center two -way left
turn lane (TWLTL) would result in acceptable levels of operations (LOS
D) through the redevelopment of the Grandview area. and that the
construction of a four lane Eden Avenue would likely result in excess
capacity and overbuilding of the roadway.
112831 45
20,000 .:............
18,000
16,000 ........................... ...............................
14 000 .......................... ...............................
N.....
..........
--
.... - ..... -* ..
- - - - --
12,000
LOS F ........
...........
15000vpd
Is
10,000
F
�• - .1 -� . .
...
(5
.... .
......... All Redevelopments
/13,800
vpd
E..
::........
O....
.:.
Just Rainbow
.........
8,000 ...............X.,
;::::;: <::::;:<::«:::: »:::; ;;;
......
13,300 vpd
Q
U
EDINA
May 1993
...............................
LOS F
...............................
2 -1-ane 3 -1-ane 4 -1-ane
Undivided
Type of Roadway
Average Weekday Traffic Demand
{ on Eden Avenue Between Sherwood
yv`> Road n
a d Arcadia Avenue
........ ...... 6,500 vpd
Existing
Legend:
Assumes No Internal or
Passerby Trips and ITE
Rates for Rainbow Foods.
Assumes 20% Reduction
for Internal and Passerby
Trips.
— — With Barton - Aschman
Trip Rates for Rainbow
and 20% Reduction for
Internal and Passerby
Trips.
;;;;:.;;:.:.;;;::;: ;::::; ......:.:::.:..:.:
15000vpd
LOS
F
(5
.... .
......... All Redevelopments
/13,800
vpd
E..
::........
O....
.:.
Just Rainbow
.........
.:
13,300 vpd
:.;.»
LOTS
D
-
— All Redevelopments
—..
— —
-°
— — — - 12,700 vpd
LOS
......... All Redevelopments
LOS �+
12,300 vpd
Just Rainbow
-
-.
OS
. -_ _'.
S
..
10,300 vpd
......_.
»:<;> >: »:: >:: >:«:
.
»:: »::; >.........
Just Rainbow
2 -1-ane 3 -1-ane 4 -1-ane
Undivided
Type of Roadway
Average Weekday Traffic Demand
{ on Eden Avenue Between Sherwood
yv`> Road n
a d Arcadia Avenue
........ ...... 6,500 vpd
Existing
Legend:
Assumes No Internal or
Passerby Trips and ITE
Rates for Rainbow Foods.
Assumes 20% Reduction
for Internal and Passerby
Trips.
— — With Barton - Aschman
Trip Rates for Rainbow
and 20% Reduction for
Internal and Passerby
Trips.
e
2
2
Super
America
a
0 .
Amoco
Edina R
Pet
OClinic
Classic
Hair
Design
A
w
N
O
m
Supermarket
�
OP:
- L�i
oc:
oz.
at Food ?'
,
staursrit
w;
Rainbow
Foods
e
0
v
� J�
A A'
.41 4'
S Uhl dsr. 12' 12' 12' Shdr.
7—
Cross-Section A -A'
Eden Avenue
C"°F Recommended
ED1NA .
;:. Roadway Improvements
AAay 1993
M
No Scale
The existing 36 -foot section on Eden Avenue is too narrow to adequately
accommodate the forecasted traffic demands on a three -lane roadway. The
12 -foot through lanes would not provide enough width for a vehicle to
pass a disabled vehicle without encroaching into the center lane. This
would result in an undesirable situation.
Therefore, it is suggested that the roadway be widened to a 44 -foot urban
cross - section (3 -12 foot lanes and 4 -foot shoulders) with a painted TWLTL
between Sherwood Road and the TH 100 southbound on -ramp. The
shoulders could be dropped underneath the existing railroad bridge to the
available 36 foot width and an exclusive right turning a could -6e added
into the proposed Rainbow Foods main access (Figure 16).
.EMI 48
SECONDARY ACCESS FOR AREA SOUTH
OF EDEN AVENUE
Access to and-from the area south of Eden Avenue is currently provided
via. Sherwood Road. There is no other access to and from this area for
patrons or employees of the Edina Pet Clinic, Classic Hair Design Salon,
TSC Office Building or Eden Circle Office Warehouse or for residents of
the 45 single family homes in this area.
As indicated in the queuing analysis, the left - turning movement from .
Sherwood Road to westbound Link Road may be blocked during a large
portion of the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period. by
vehicles stacked back from the left - turning lane on the east approach of the
Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection. This condition may also block the
left- turning movement into the area, which could result in the entire area
south of Eden Avenue (excluding the Rainbow Foods development) being
restricted to one right in/right out access during certain hours of the day.
However, the proposed Rainbow Foods development may also offer an
opportunity to provide a second access roadway to and from the area south
of Eden Avenue. This roadway could be provided if an agreement could
be reached between Rainbow Foods and the City of Edina that would
modify the proposed eastern access driveway to /from Rainbow Foods to
connect with existing Eden Circle and operate as a public roadway (Figure
17). The advantages and disadvantages of providing this roadway
connection are listed below.
Advantages
1. Provides another access into and out of this area, such that, if the
Sherwood Road access is blocked during the post- Rainbow develop-
ment PM peak hour time period, patrons will still be able to access
this area.
2. The roadway connection would provide another emergency access
route to /from this area, which is desirable for public safety reasons.
#IMI 49
i
` PGQ�is
®f
POSSIBLE
PUSUC
f ROADWAY
r RAINBOW CONNECT 0t+I
FOODS
son 'SITE I
� 1
�t
It
L
y
Conceptual Illustration
CrNOF of Secondary
E D I NA < Roadway Connection
GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE (# 2).
3. The secondary access would provide Rainbow Foods with additional
public roadway frontage, which would increase visibility and
accessibility.
Disadvantages
1. May require Rainbow Foods to dedicate necessary right -of -way for
the roadway, which would decrease the amount of developable land
area for parking and truck maneuvering.
11128!1 51
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Rainbow Foods/fast -food development south of Eden
Avenue is - expected -to generate approximately 8,270 daily vehicle
trips, including 297 inbound and 285 outbound trips during the PM /
peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they assume no (/
internal or passerby trips and TTE "supermarket" trips rates, which
are likely high for this type of grocery store.
• The proposed redevelopment of the four sites within the Grandview
area (.the Rainbow Foods development, the Regis redevelopment, the
assumed Jerry's Foods expansion and the Murphy automotive devel-
opment) is expected to generate approximately 15,860 daily vehicle
trips, including 573 inbound and 645 outbound vehicle trips during ✓
the PM peak hour. These estimates are conservative, since they
assume no internal or passerby trips and no reduction for trips
generated by the existing land uses on these sites.
• A comparison of the three possible development scenarios for the
area south of Eden Avenue (Rainbow Foods development, medium
density residential development or office /office- showroom
development) indicate that the proposed Rainbow Foods development
would be expected to generate significantly more traffic than the
other two development alternatives.
The previous Grandview Area Traffic Studies, prepared by BRW,
Inc., in 1984 and 1990, assumed a directional distribution for trips
to /from the Grandview area of 25 percent via Vernon Avenue to the
southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen Boulevard, 50 percent via TH
100 and 10 percent via Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east. This
distribution was based on the Metropolitan Council's regional travel
model for the Twin Cities Metropolitan area and on regional land use
types (office, industrial, residential) for the Grandview area. Since
the area is now proposed for a much larger percentage of retail
redevelopment, which should draw from a smaller subregional or
local area, the previous traffic studies distribution was not used to
distribute traffic for this report.
Simi 52
• The expected directional distribution of site - generated traffic to and
from the proposed Rainbow Foods store and the other proposed/
expected retail development was based on a vehicle trace study
conducted by BRW, Inc. The trace study was conducted by
following vehicles from the existing Jerry's Foods grocery store to
determine their travel routes to /from the area. The trace study
distribution estimates that the major approach roadways to the
redevelopment sites will be Vernon Avenue to /from the southwest
(47 percent), Interlachen Boulevard -(15 percent), TH 100 (16
percent) and Vernon and Eden Avenues to the east (13 percent).
A market study conducted by the developers of the Rainbow Foods
site estimated the directional distribution as; 20 percent to /from
Vernon. Avenue' to the southwest, 15 percent via Interlachen
Boulevard, 28 percent via TH 100 and 37 percent via Vernon and
Eden Avenues to the east. This .market study distribution was also
analyzed in this report.
• Capacity analyses indicate that the existing key intersections within
the Grandview area currently operate at acceptable levels of traffic
operations (LOS D or better) during the PM peak hour, with the
exception of the left- turning movements from the two Jerry's
access drives onto southbou mon Avenue, which operate at
LOS E and LOS F. However, field observations of these,
intersections indicate that the existing traffic signals at Interlachen
Boulevard and Link Road create enough gaps in the Vernon Avenue
traffic stream to allow these movements to occur with only moderate
delays, and, accident analysis indicate that there have not been
accident problems at these locations.
In addition, the capacity analyses of the existing conditions also
indicate that the southbound to eastbound left - turning movement at
the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection currently
operates at capacity.
• Capacity analyses of the. post - redevelopment PM peak hour traffic
conditions, with either the trace study or, market study distributions,
indicate that each of the key intersection locations should continue
to operate- at an acceptable level, with the exception- of the three
movements noted above as being deficient in the existing conditions.
These movements are likely to continue to operate at unacceptable
levels and to decline in the post - redevelopment conditions.
• A capacity analysis was also conducted for the expected post -
redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) Sunday morning traffic
conditions to determine if patrons of the Our Lady of Grace Church
would be expected to encounter difficulties in exiting onto Eden
Dim1 53
v
J J
Avenue during the Sunday morning grocery shopping period. The
analysis indicated that the exiting movements from the church access
onto Eden Avenue should operate at an acceptable level (LOS C)
during the Sunday morning period.
• Traffic signal warrant analyses for the Vernon Avenue intersections
with the two Jerry's Foods access drives indicates that neither
intersection currently meets the Warrant 11 requirements for the
installation of a traffic signal and that neither intersection is expected
to meet the requirements following the Rainbow Foods development.
However, the -South access intersection is expected -to exceed -the -
Warrant 11 requirements. following the redevelopment of the area
between Eden Avenue and the existing Jerry's Foods.
• Queuing analyses indicate that the 200 feet of available storage
distance on the east approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road
intersection is expected to be exceeded during the post - Rainbow
Foods development conditions with either the trace study or market
study distributions. The expected traffic queues from the east
approach left turn lane may block left - turning traffic to and from
Sherwood Road, which would provide the area south -of Eden
Avenue with only right in/right out access during the PM peak
period. Traffic movements in and out of the existing Super- America
access drive on Link Road may also be blocked by queued vehicles
on the east approach -of -the Vernon- Avenue /Link Road intersection.
Queuing analyses also indicate that the right turning movements on
the east and south approaches and the left- turning movement on the
north approach of the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection may be
deficient in the post - Rainbow Foods development PM peak period.
• The recent accident history (1989 to 1991) of Vernon Avenue
between Arcadia Avenue and Link Road indicate that there ace no
intersections along this segment that exhibited accident rates higher
than the typical average rates of 1.5 accJMEV for signalized
intersections and 0.5 accJMEV for unsignalized intersections.
However, there were an unusually high percentage of left turn
accidents at the Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard intersection.
Most of these left - turning accidents occurred because westbound to
southbound left - turning vehicles did not yield the right -of -way to
oncoming eastbound through vehicles.
Field observations of the intersection indicate that this left- turning
movement is shared (i.e., left and through lane) and that the sight
distance is marginal as the west approach of the intersection is on a
horizontal curve.
81n3l 54
• The forecasted post - redevelopment (including Rainbow Foods) traffic
demand on Eden Avenue is expected to exceed the capacity of a two -
lane roadway. However, a three -lane roadway with a TWLTL should
adequately accommodate the expected traffic demand.
• The construction of a second access roadway to and from the
Sherwood neighborhood south of Eden Avenue would be desirable
for public safety reasons (emergencies) and because the existing
access roadway (Sherwood Road) may be blocked during a large
portion of the PM peak hour. The construction of this roadway will
require cooperation from Rainbow Foods as it will likely impact their
development plans.
This traffic study has concluded that the future traffic operations within the
Grandview Area of the City of Edina will be acceptable, with or without
the proposed and expected redevelopment within the area (including the
Rainbow Foods development), if the recommendations within this report
are implemented.
EIK:1r
55
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Widen Eden Avenue from Sherwood Road to the TH 100 South-
bound. -on- ramp -to a -44 -foot- urban - section- (three 12- foot - lanes and -
4 -foot shoulders) with a center two -way, left -turn lane.
• Provide a secondary access to the Sherwood neighborhood via a new
road that would be located between the existing Soo Line Railroad
right -of -way and the proposed Rainbow Foods store. The right -of-
way for this access roadway would need to be negotiated with
Rainbow- Foods.
• Provide an exclusive right turning lane into the proposed Rainbow
Foods site off of Eden Avenue.
• Monitor the traffic demands at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road
intersection following the Rainbow Foods development and adjust the
traffic signal timing if necessary.
• Install signage near the existing Super - America access drives onto
Link Road instructing motorists queued on Link Road not to
physically block left -turn access in/out of Super - America.
• Monitor the accident conditions at the Vernon Avenue&terlachen
Boulevard intersection, particularly the westbound to southbound left -
turning movement, and construct an exclusive left turn lane with
protective signal phasing, if necessary.
#IMI 56
APPENDIX
Simi 57
Trip Generation Rates for
Different Types of G rocery Stores
BY RONALD J. HENSEN
[)unng a recent traffic impact study
for a commercial development,
traffic counts of two types of existing
grocery stores were needed when local
neighborhood groups objected to the
use of the rates published in ITE's Trip
Generation because of the average na-
ture of the rates. The groups were con-
cerned that a proposed "warehouse" su-
permarket would generate traffic
volumes and neighborhood impacts
greater than projected by the ITE rates.
They preferred that, instead of the re-
gional warehouse supermarket, a gro-
cery "superstore," similar to an existing
facility across town, be built.
The ITE Trip Generation report de-
fines a supermarket as a "retail store
selling a complete assortment of food,
food preparation and wrapping mate-
rials, and household cleaning and serv-
icing items. The supermarkets surveyed
are usually open for business between
9 -00 q _ and 9r00 n_m " Fnr the nur-
• Greater than 60,000 square feet in
size.
• Customers bag their own groceries.
• Open 24 hours a day.
• Advertises discounted prices!
Traffic counts were
performed at a
recently opened
warehouse store
and a successful
superstore.
To satisfy the concerns of the neigh-
borhood and the city planning commis-
sion, traffic counts were performed at a
recently opened warehouse store and a
successful superstore that were similar
to the proposed warehouse and super-
store (stores had same names an&sites
had comparable residential densities and
traffic volumes).
An actual count of trips (i.e., vehicles)
attracted to a grocery store in a devel-
opment with other commercial activities
can be difficult to isolate. However, trips
can be estimated by tabulating exiting
groups of store patrons and employees
and by observing patterns of transit and
walking trips. Using this procedure, the
number of exiting vehicles was esti-
mated. As can be 'seen from Figure 1,
the superstore, even with its smaller size
(47,000 sq. ft. vs. 72,000 sq. ft.), gener-
ated 50% more traffic than the ware-
house store.
Recognizing that the two stores could
have disproportionate sales, and as a
supplement to the count data, sales in-
formation was obtained for both stores
for the same time period. A breakdown
of this sales data ('fable 1) shows that
Table 1. Weekly Sales Data
Superstore Warehouse
Square footage
47,000
72,000
Average weekly
customer
count
31,000
21,000
Average
purchase per
customer
$16.00
$38.00
Average weekly
sales (approx)
$500,000
$800,000
ADT (approxy
1,000 sq. ft.
220
80
Parking stalls
provided/1,000
sq. ft. (approx)
5
8
Observed
parking stall
use (max)
5
5
Table 2. Approximate Trip Rates, per
1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Vehicle Trip Ends
P.IM. Peak
Hour of
Adjacent
Street
System
Land Use Weekday In Out
Supermarket
(ITE rate,) 125.5 4.50 4.32
Superstore°
(study site) 220.0 12A 11.0
Warehouseb
(study site) 80.0 3.4 3.5
° Source: cited reference 1, pages 1236 -1237.
° Design day of Thursday.
22 - ITE JOURNAL - OCTOBER 1988
the warehouse patrons spend almost
two- and -a -half times as much money per
shopping trip than do their superstore
shopping counterparts. This generally
results in a longer shopping time and less
parking turnover. (Warehouse store pol-
icies typically require additional parking
stalls.)
Table 1 also exhibits the weekly sales
transactions (customer counts) for both
stores. Utilizing weekly sales data, an
estimate of the average weekday vehicle
trip ends (AWT) generated from each
site for each day of the week was deter-
mined. Figure 2 shows a daily compari-
son between the two stores based on the
number of customers per 1,000 square
feet. Table 2 summarizes the .rM trip
rate for supermarkets and the approxi-
mate trip rates for each study site.
The results of this study appear to sug-
gest that trip generation rates for super-
store and warehouse grocery stores may
differ significantly from • those reported
for the supermarket land use in Trip
Generation. However, local studies of a
supermarket may -also find rates signifi-
cantly different from the rate reported in
Trip Generation. This is not unusual, as =
the rate reported in Thp Generation is
an average rate, based on a wide range
of values.
Reference
1. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip
Generation, 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: ITE,
1987 1
Ronald J. Hensen
is the principal of
TransPlan Associ-
ates, Inc., in Boul-
der, Colorado. He
holds B.S., M.S.,
and Ph. D. degrees
in engineering and is a Fellow of ITE.
Hensen's experience includes 15 years of
teaching and traffic engineering research
at both Purdue University and the Uni-
versity of Denver and 5 years as traffic
engineer for the City of Lakewood, Col-
orado. Since 1979, he has been a full -time
traffic engineering consultant.
160
140
120
c 100
E 6- 80
o
a 60
U 40 =F]
20
0
SUN. MON. TUES. WED. THUR. FRI. SAT.
Day of Week
Warehouse O Superstore
Figure 2. Grocery store comparison: Customers vs. day of the week.
Public Works Access
OR
390(190)
OR
000
S °o
Our Lady of
Grace Church Access
Legend:
00 Total Traffic
(00) Rainbow foods Site
Generated Component
e
_ Post Redevelopment
;I E D I NA Sunday Morning (10:00 - 11:00 a.m.)
Traffic Forecasts
0(0)
340(160)
0(0)
ACM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transoortation
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE
(N-S) LINK ROAD
Analyst: JGH
File Name: EDINAEX1.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29_93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA /
=======================================================================
GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2
EXISTING TRAFFIC
| Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound |
Southbound
|L
T R |L T
R |L T R |L
T R
|----
---- ----|---- -_--
---- i ---- ---- ----}----
---- ----
No. Lanes 1
2 1 i 1 2 <
| 1 1 <
> 1 <
Volumes 2
697 162| 88 548
101 185 5 771
17 9 11
Lane Width 112.0
12.0 12.0112.0 12.0
|12.0 12.0 |
12.0
RTOR Vols �
���������������������--------------------------------------------------
100l
O| 01
0
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2 3 4
| 5 6
7 8
EB Left
*
|NB Left *
Thru
*
| Thru *
Right
*
| Right *
Peds
| Peds
WB Left
1SB Left *
Thru
* *
| Thru *
Right
* *
i Right *
Peds
| Peds
NB Right
1EB Right
SB Right
JWB Right
Green
5A 10A 40A
!Green 23A
Yellow/A-R
0 4 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0
3.0 3.0
!Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90
_______________________________________________________________________
secs Phase combination
order: #1 #2 #3
#5
Intersection Performance
Summary
Lane Group:
Adj Sat v/c
g/C'
Approachx
Mvmts Cap
_____ ____
Flow Ratio
_______ _____
Ratio Delay LOS
_____ _____
Delay LOS
EB L 38
1693 0.05
___
0.02 32.7 D
_____ ___
11.2 B
T 1624
3564 0.50
0.46 11.3 B
R 690
1515 0.10
0.46 9.0 B
WD L 301
1693 0.33
0.18 24.8 C
7'9 B
TR 2172
3555 - 0.30
0.61 5.4 B
NB L 429
1607 0.48
0.27 21.8 C
20.2 C
TR 409
1532 0'23
0.27 16.7 C
SB LTR 373
1398 0.11
0.27 16.1 C
16.1 C
Intersection
Delay =
11.4 sec/veh Intersection
LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle,
_______________________________________________________________________
L = 9.0 sec Critical
v/c(x) = 0.460
HCM: SIGNALWED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center
=======================================================================
For Microcomputers In Transportation*
� Streets: (E-W) VERNON
AVENUE . (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD.
Analyst: JGH
File Name: EDINAEX4.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW
=====================================================
UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC
| Eastbound
|
=================
Westbound | Northbound | Southbound
L lr
- |R
L L .T -R-- | |-- ]� - -F�---! -L T -R
____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____|____ ____ ____
No. Lanes 1 1 2
< 1
> 2 < | > 1 < | 1 1 <
Volumes ! 239 339
71
64 479 4191 21 161 9| 302 81
60
�-.-Lone-Width 112.0-12,0
(
12.0 | 12.0 |IZLO 12.()
� �
RTOR Vols 1
_______________________________________________________________________
011
011 011
0
Signal Operations
- Phase Combination 1
2
3 4 | 5 6 7
8
ED Left *
*
!NB Left *
Thru *
*
| Thru *
Right *
*
{ Right *
Peds
( Peds
WE Left
*
QB Left *
Thru
*
| Thru *
Right
*
| Right *
Peds
Peds
NB' Right
|EB Right
SB Right
QB Right
Green 17A
38A
}Green 27A
Yellow/A-R 0
' 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0
3.0
|Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs
________________________________________-________-_____________________
Phase
combination order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection
Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat
v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap
_____ ____ _______
Flow
Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
_____
ED L 263
1693
_____ _____ ___ _____
0.75 0.62 16.9 C 9.5
B
TR 2211
3553
0.18 0.62 4.7 A
WE LTR 1382
3190
0.81 0.43 16.7 C 16.7
C
` NB LTR 495
1592
0.43 0.31 16.2 C 16.2
C
' SB L 350
1125
0.96 0.31 50.8 E 39.5
D
� TR 519
1668
0.30 0.31 15.3 C
Intersection
Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS =
C
Lost Time/Cycle, L =
___-_________________-________________________-_________-____________-_
6.0
sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.822
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993 o`
Cehter For Microcomputers In Transportation '
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) TH 100 SB RAMPS
Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX5.HC9
Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC
'
=======================================================================
| Eastbouhd | Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound
|L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R
�---- ---- ---- | ---_ ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ----
No. Lanes i 2 1 | > 2 | | 1 > 1
Volumes 480 1721 190 610 i | 595 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 12.01 12.0 | 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 100| 0| | 0
_______________________________________________________________________
Signal Operations '
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 '
EB Left 1 N Left
Thru * i Thru
Right * | Right
Peds i Peds
WB Left * 1SB Left *
Thru * i Thru *
Right | Right
Peds Peds
NB Right }EB Right
SB Right |uB Right
Green 46A !Green 36A
Yellow/A-R 4 ' !Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
_______________________________________________________________________
intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
_____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____
EB T 1861 3564 0.30 0.52 7.9 B 7.8 B
R 791 1515 0.10 0.52 7.0 B
WR LT 1407 2695 0.66 0.52 10.9 B 10.9 B
SB L 696 1693 0.47 0.41 15.1 C 14.0 B .
LT 698 1698 0.48 0.41 12.9 B
Intersection Delay = 10.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.580
_______________________________________________________________________
' --
;
`. HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
` Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) GRANGE ROAD
Analyst: JGH File Name: EDINAEX6.HC9
/
Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 EXISTING TRAFFIC
| Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound
� | L - T _R _| L __T R | L T- R- | L T -R
- �---- ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No' Lanes | 2 < i > 2 | 1 1 |
Volumes | 775 100| 6 780 ( 278 314|
� Lane -Width-!-- - 12�0���� l����__12._0 |12_.0_ _12�0| —
x
RTOR Vols | 0| 0i 100|
_______________________________________________________________________
Sig/al Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 r 5 6 7 8
.ED Left �NB Left *
Thru * | Thru
Right * | Right *
Peds } Peds
WD Left * |SB Left
Thru Thru
Right ( Right
P e d Peds
NB Right !EB Right
SB Right |WB Right
Green 52A :Green 30A
Yellow/A-R 4 !Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time no Kost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #i 05
_______________________________________________________________________
Intersection Performance Summary
^ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____
EB TR 2063 3503 0.49 0.59 7.1 B 7.1 B
WB LT 2023 3435 0.45 0.59 6.8 B `6.B B
NB L 583 1693 0.53 0.34 18.7 C 17.2 C
R 522 1515 0.46 0.34 15.2 C
— Intersection Delay = 9.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.508
- _______________________________________________________________________
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
05-19-1993
Center
For Microcomputers
In Transportation
�
Streets: (E-W) VERNON
AVENUE
(N-S) LINK ROAD
�
Analyst: JGH
File Name: QWLYRTD1.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29-93 PM Pk,'
�
Comment: EDINA /
GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2
only Rainbow dev. w
trace dist.
�
| Eastbound
1 Westbound
Northbound |
Southbound
1L
T R |L T
R 1L T R |L
T
R '
� ____
____ ____ | ____ ____
____ | -___ ____ -___ |____
____ ____
No. Lanes | 1
2 1 | 1 2
< | 1 1 < |
> 1 <
�
Volumes | 2
697 2771 135 548
101 302 5 1141
17 9
11 �
Lane Width 112.0
12.0 12.0:12.0 12.0
:12.0 12.0 |
12.0
`
RTOR Vols |
_________________________________________________________
100|
0| 0|
0
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2 3
4 | 5
6 7
8 `
EB Left
*
!NB Left *
Thru
*
| Thru *
Right
*
| Right *
'
Peds
'
i Peds
WB Left �
* *
|SB Left *
Thru
Thru *
Right
* *
| Right *
Peds
| Peds
NB Right
|EB Right
BB Right
1WB Right
Green
5A 10A 40A
!Green 23A
Yellow/A-R
0 4 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0
3.0 3.0
!Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90
_______________________________________________________________________
secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3
#5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group:
Adj Sat v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts Cap
_____ ____
Flow Ratio
------- -----
Ratio Delay LOS
Delay
LOS
EB L 38
1693 0.05
_____ _____ ___
0.02 32.7 D
_____
11.1
___
B
T 1624
3564 0.50
0.46 11.3 B
R 690
1515 0.29
0.46 10.0 B
WB L 301
1693 0.50
0.18 26.5 D
9.3
B
TR 2172
3555 0.30
0.61 5.4 B
NB L 428
1606 0.78
0.27 29.6 D
26.1
D
TR 487
1527 0.0
0.27 17.3 C
SB LTR 349
1308 0.12
0.27 16.1 C
16.1
C `
Intersection
Delay =
13.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS =
B
Lost Time/Cycle,
_______________________________________________________________________
L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.584
p�
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE ' (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD.
Analyst: JGH ' File Name: ONLYRTD4.HC9
Area Type: Other ' 4-29-93 PM PK
_ Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 only Rainbow with trace dist.
| Eastbound 1 Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound
1L T R 1L T R |L T R | L T R
(---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- } ---- ---- ---- ---_ ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 2 < > 2 < | > 1 < } 1 1 <
Volumes 1 276 349 7| 64 489 4191 21 161 91 302 81 97
Larrn-Width !12.0-12.0- K 12.0� �� � � -12. 3 � 1112.0 12
' #"l-OR Vols | 0| 0i 0i 0
_______________________________________________________________________
Signal Operations
°
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4! 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * :NB Left *
Thru * * | Thru *
Right Right *
Peds | Peds
WB Left * 1SB Left *
Thru * i Thru *
Right Right *
Peds | Peds
NB Right |EB Right
SB Right QB Right
Green 17A 38A !Green 27A
Yellow/A-R 0 4 !Yellow/A-R 4 '
Lost Time 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase com bination order: #1 #2 #5
----------------------------- I -----------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance S6mmary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
_____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ ___
EB L 263 1693 0.91 0.62 34.0 D 17.1 C
TR 2211 3553 0'19 0.62 4~7 A
WB LTR 1380 3185 0.82 0.43 17.0 C 17.0 C
'- NB LTR 484 1556 0.44 0.31 16.3 C 16.3 C
SE L 349 1123 0.96 0.31 51.2 E 38.1 D
TR 509 1636 0.39 0.31 15.9 C
Intersection Delay = 21.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.853
_______________________________________________________________________
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
^
Streets: (E�W) VERNON AVENUE
(N-S) LINK ROAD
`v
Analyst: JGH
File Name: PDWRTD1.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA /
GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2
POST-DEV. W RAINBOW
& TRACE DIST.
| Eastbound | Westbound
| Northbound |
Southbound �
|L
T R |L T
R |L T R
/
L T R
---- ____
____ _-__ ____ ____|____
No' Lanes | 1
2 1 | 1 2 <
1 < j
> 1 < �
Volumes | 2
749 3011 131 616
101 343 4 1001
17 9 11
Lane Width 112.0
12.0 12.0112.0 12.0
112.0.12.0 |
12.0
RTOR Vols
__ ------ ________________________
100|
___________________________________________
011 0|
�
0 , ^
`
Signal Operations
�
Phase Combination
1 3 4
1 5
6 7 8 �
EB Left
*
|NB Left *
�
Thru
*
| Thru *
Right
*
i Right *
`
Peds
i Peds
WB Left
* *
|SB Left *
Thru
* *
i Thru *
Right
* *
j Right *
Peds
| Peds
NB Right
|EB Right
SB Riqht
XB Right
Green
5A 10A 40A
:Green 23A
Yellow/A-R
0 4 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
�
Lost Time 3.0
3.0 3.0
!Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
secs Phase combination
order: #1 #2 #3
#5
Intersection Performance
Summary
Lane Group:
Adj ,Sat v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts Cap
- _____ ____
Flow Ratio
_______ _____
Ratio Delay LOS
-----
Delay LOS '
EB L 38
1693 0.05
_____ ___
0.02 32.7 D
----- -__
11'4 B
T 1624
3564 0.54
0.46 11.7 B
R 690
1515 0.32
0.46 10.2 B
WB L 301
1693 0.49
0.18 26.3 D
9.0 B
TR 2173
3556 0.34
0.61 5.6 B
�
NB L 428
1606 0.89
0.27 38.2 D
33.3 D
TR 406
1524 0.28
0.27 17.0 C
SB LTR 360
1349 0.11
0.27 16.1 C
16.1 C
Intersection
Delay =
15.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle,
_______________________________________________________________________
L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.632
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
, Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) INTERLACHEN BLVD.
� Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD4.HC9
Area Type: Other, 4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW & TRACE DIST.
=======================================================================
� Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound
|L T R |L T R |L T _R 1L T R
�____ --__ ____|____ ____ -__- ---- ____ ____(____ ____ ____
�No. Lanes 1 1 2 < ( > 2 < | > 1 < 1 1 <
16i Volumes 1 297 357 271 71 500 4191 36 16 91 304 89 110
�
-Lane'-Width |1Z.() 12.0 -| J2.0---- >— - -12.0�� 112-�()-12.0 —
, RTOR Vols 0: 0| 0
______________________-________________________________________________
_ Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * :NB Left *
Thru * * | Thru *
Right * * j Right *
Peds | Peds
WB Left * iSB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right * | Right *
Peds | Peds
NB Right 1EB Right
SD Right :WB Right
Green 17A 38A !Green 27A
Yellow/A-R 0 4 }Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
_____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____ ___
EB L 263 1693 0.99 0.62 54.0 E 25.7 D
TR 2194 3526 0,20 0.62 4.8 A
WB LTR 1363 3145 0.85 0.43 17.9 C 17.9 C
NB LTR 451 1449 0.52 0.31 17.2 C 17.2 C
SB L 341 1097 0.99 0.31 58.4 E 41.8 E
TR 508 1634 0.43 0.31 16.3 C
Intersection Delay = 25.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
` Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.890
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation '
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE (N-S) TH 100 SB RAMPS
Analyst: JGH File Name: PDWRTD5.HC9
Area Type: Other 4-29-93 PM PK
Comment, EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE #2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW& TRACE DIST.
=======================================================================
� Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound
|L T, R 1L T R 1L T R |L T R
�---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----:---- _--- ----
No. Lanes i 2 1 | > 2 1 > 1
Volumes | 498 1771 190 627 | 1 595 17
Lane Width | 12.0 12.0| 11.0 | !12.0 12.O
RTOR Vols | 100| 0| | O
____________________________________________________-__________________
` Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8
EB Left 1NB Left
Thru * | Thru '
Right * | Right
Peds | Peds
WB Left * QB Left *
Thru * | Thru *
Right | Right
Peds | Peds
NO Right |EB Right
SB Right |WB Right
Green 46A !Green 36A
Yellow/A-R 4 !Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
_______________________________________________________________________
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
_____ ____ _______ _____ _____ _____ ___ _____
EB T 1.861 3564 0.31 0.52 8.0 B 7.8 B
R 791 1515 0.11 0.52 7.0 B
WB LT 1391 2664 0.69 0.52 11.2 B 11.2 B
SB L 696 1693 0.47 0.41 15.1 C 14.1 B
LT 700 1702 0.50 0.41 13.1 B
Intersection Delay = 11.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.604
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
^ '
SUMMARY 05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE
(N-S) GRANGE ROAD
' Analyst: JGH
File Name: PDWRTD6.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29-93 PM PK '
Comment: EDINA / GRANDVIEW UPDATE
#2 POST-DEV. W RAINBOW & TRACE DIST.
| Eastbound |
Westbound 1 Northbound | Southbound
�L T R |L
T R '|L T R |L T R
�---- ---- ----|----
---- ---- -_-- ---- ----|---- ---- ----
No. Lanes j 2 <
> 2
Volumes ( 794 1011
6 795 | 280 314}
� Lane-Width 1I!,0 � �
12.0- |12~0 12.0|-
� RTOR Vols | 0�
--------------------------------------------------
0| 100|
Signal
_---------------------------
Operations
' Phase Combination 1 2
3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left
|NB Left *
Thru
Thru
Right *
| Right *
Peds
i Peds
WB Left *
|SB Left
Thru *
| Thru
Right
Right
Peds
| Peds
NB Right
!EB Right
SB Right
|WB Right
Green 52A
|Green 30A '
Yellow/A-R 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time no
!Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase
�������������������������������������������������������������----------
combination order: #1 #5
Intersection
Performance Summary
` Lane Group: Adj Sat
v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow
----- ---- ------- -
Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
-----
EB TR 2063 3504
----- ----- --- ----- ---
0.51 0.59 7.1 B 7.1 B
WB LT 2015 3421
0.46 0.59 6-9 B 6.9 B
NB L 583 1693
0.53 0.34 18.8 C 17.2 C
R 522 1515
0.46 0.34 15.2 C
Intersection Delay = 9.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.516
_______________________________________________________________________
`HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
05-19-1993
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) VERNON AVENUE
(N-S) LINK ROAD
Analyst: JGH
File Name: WORST1.HC9
Area Type: Other
4-29-93 PM PK
Comment: WITH ITE
TRIP RATES FOR RAINBOW
AND TRACE STUDY
DISTRIBUTION
� Eastbound 1 Westbound
| Northbound |
Southbound
� L
T R 1 L T
R | L T` R |
L T R
�____ ____
_-__ ---- ____
____1____ _-__ ____
____ ____ ____
No. Lanes | 1
2 1 | 1 2 <
| 1 1 < |
> 1 <
Volumes i 2
754 3731 164 629
10| 405 5 1331
17 9 11
Lane Width :12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 |
12.0
RTOR Vols |
_____ ---- ___________________-
100|
0| 0:
0
7_______-_____-____________________________
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2 3 4
| 5
6 7 8
EB Left �
*
!NB Left *
Thru
*
( Thru *
Right
*
| Right *
Peds
i Peds
WB Left
}SB Left *
Thru
* *
| Thru *
Right
* *
| Right *
Peds
Peds
NB Right
|EB Right
SB Right
!WB Right
Green
5A 10A 35A
:Green 28A
'
Yellow/A-R
O 4 4
!Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0
3.0 3.0
:Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 90
_______________________________-______________________________________--
secs Phase combination
order: #1 #2 #3
#5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group:
Adj Sat v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts Cap
_____ ____
Flow Ratio
_______ _____
Ratio Delay LOS
_____
Delay LOS
EB L 38
1693 0.05
_____ ___
0.02 32.7 D
_____ ___
14.2 B
T 1426
3564 0.62
0.40 14.4 B
R 606
1515 0.50
0.40 13.6 B
WD L 301
1693 0.60
0.18 28.4 D
11.4 B
TR 1976
3556 0.38
0.56 7.3 B
NB L 505
1567 0.89
0.32 34.6 D
29.6 D
TR 491
1525 0.31
0.32 15.0 B
SB LTR 412
1278 0.10
0.32 13.8 B
13.8 B
Intersection
belay = 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L
_____________________________-________________________________________-
= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.713
JUN 10 '93 08:24 ERW INCo
Telecopy
Date: V N C—I 1 o
8 R w INC. Please deliver the following page(s) to:
Recipient: M!¢2cc =(,�f� b4jC Ii "
Company or Agency: `i Tr cr)= U191 0.14
Address:
Fax #: 5'Z7—
This telecopy is being sent by:
P.1
PIMOMg Name:
7kansportation
Wneering Studio or Department:
Urban Design
If you do not receive y pages, including cover sheet, please contact:
'Iluesha square .
70DThWStreetSo. �f. at bl2 /370 -0700, Ext. y�Z
Mirweapous,
MN SMIS
612/370-0700 Remarks:
Fax 612/37a1378
Mirkmapolis
Phomix
Denver
St. Prtersburg
San Diego
Soattio
MW 0S.Mai-Oh
r
I
JUN 10 '99 09:24 BRW INCo
. ..... ............................................................._....................................................... .,.............................
20,000
LOS F
... 18,000
14,000
m
a
12,000
cv
10,000
O
8,000
T
k.
RCK
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2 -Lane 3 -Lane Undivided 4 -1-a
Type of Roadway
Average Weekday Traffic Demand
91-C-61 A �. ason Eden Avenue Between Sherwood
lN 1F$ Road and Arcadia Avenue
GRAN i) *%/IEW AR F; A TRAFFIC STUDY
P.2
000 vpd
Redevelopments
adud:7
�S sz+4 of
�n i�Yegve
)a "pd
ajavel op'"ents
10FK'ce- VWjrw"
of &C,% AV,-. ,=
'00 vpd'
)sting
Legend:
Assumes NQ Bstemal or
Passerby Trips and RE
Rates for Rainbow Foods.
ft
JUN 10 '93 09:25 DRW INCo
CONCLUSIONS
• Three alternative land uses scenarios are being considered for the
redevelopment of the area south of Eden Avenue. The expected trip
generation from each scenario is as follows:
- Rainbow /Fast Food - 11,300 VPD
- Medium Density Residential -1,180 VPD
- Office /Office Showroom -1,280 VPD
• Other redevelopment in the area would ultimately add another 4,560
VPD for a total of as much as 15,860 net new trips in the Grandview
Area.
• Existing traffic operations at all key public street intersections are
considered acceptable.
P.3
• A "worst case" analysis of post redevelopment conditions indicates
that the level of congestion at all key public street intersections is -
expected to increase but remain at acceptable levels.
• The additional new trips generated by -a grocery/fast food
development south of Eden Avenue will increase volumes and
congestion. on Eden to the point where the roadway would need to
be three lanes in order to provide an acceptable level of traffic
operations.
• A "worst case" analysis of the total redevelopment being considered
in the Grandview Area indicates that Eden Avenue would have to
be widened to four lanes in order to provide acceptable levels of
traffic operations.
• A "worst rase" analysis of the post redevelopment traffic volumes
indicates that queuing along Link Road (from the traffic signal at
Vernon Avenue) is likely to extend past Sherwood Road during peak
traffic periods.
n2M
JUN 10 '93 08 26 DRW INC.
EDINA / GRANDVIEW AREA TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE 02
CAPACITY ANALYSES SUMMARY
P.4
t Southbound left turn at capacity. -
aa Southbound and Eastbound left turns at capacity.
Alt. 1 - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Market Study Distribution.
Alt. 1A - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Trace Study Distribution.
Alt. 2 = All Redevelopment With Market Study Distribut'ion.'
Alt. 2A - All Redevelopment With Trace Study Distribution.
PM PEAK
HOUR LEVELS
OF SERVICE
#
INTERSECTION
CONTROL
EXISTING
Alt.'1
Alt. 1A
Alt. 2
Alta
1
VERNON AVE. / LINK RD.
SIGNAL
B
B
C
C
C.
2
VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
F
F
F
F
FOODS SOUTH ACCESS
3
VERNON AVE. / JERRY'S
THRU /STOP
-
F
F
F
F
FOODS NORTH ACCESS
4
VERNON AVE. /
SIGNAL
C a
C i
C t
C
C 9
INTERLAC EN BLVD.
5
VERNON AVE. J TH 100
SIGNAL.
B
8
B
8
8
SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
6
50TH ST. / GRANGE RD.
SIGNAL
B
B
B
B
3
7
EDEN ANE. / SNERW00D RD.
THRU /STOP
-
C
D
C
D
6-
E DEIi . AM. / AF4rADI A AVE . -
4-,WAY STOP
B
C
B
C
C
9
EWK AVE. / WILSON RD.
4 -WAY STOP
B
C
S,
C
C
10
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
C
D
C
D
RAINBOW WEST'ACCESS
11
EDEN AVE. / PROPOSED
THRU /STOP
-
C
C
C
C
RAINBOW EAST ACCESS
t Southbound left turn at capacity. -
aa Southbound and Eastbound left turns at capacity.
Alt. 1 - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Market Study Distribution.
Alt. 1A - Only Rainbow Foods Development With Trace Study Distribution.
Alt. 2 = All Redevelopment With Market Study Distribut'ion.'
Alt. 2A - All Redevelopment With Trace Study Distribution.
q1� 1l?l
a e `>
�T O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth
Rosland
Agenda Item #
II.
C.
From:
Kris P.
Aaker
Consent
[ 7x
Information Only
❑
Date:
June 7,
1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
B-93 -5,
Variance
0
To Council
Appeal.
6312
Hills Road.
Action
Motion
Indian
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Acknowledge withdrawal of appeal.
Info /Background:
As indicated in the attached letter, the property owners of 6312
Indian Hills Road have decided to withdraw their request for a five
foot sideyard setback variance.
The homeowners have indicated to staff that they wish to pursue a
conforming solution.
HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES 612 9410572 P.01
i
%c` _ �_
fr !L�/K. YO /QiYt d ?xv
2
A.
o e, �.
• , RIO 6-' •
ne•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: June 7, 1993
Subject: Amendments to Sign
Ordinance, Section
460 of City Code &
Moratorium of Sign
Permits.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
I I I . A. & B.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
[]
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt Ordinance Amendments and Repeal Moratorium on Sign Permits.
Info /Background:
As directed by the Council, staff has prepared amendments to two
sections of the sign ordinance.
1. Freestanding Signs. The ordinance is revised to allow one
sign per building in the PCD -2 District. Presently, the code
allows one freestanding sign for each street frontage.
2. Awnings. The ordinance is revised to treat transparent or
translucent awnings as signs, whether illuminated or not.
If the Council adopts the amendments staff would recommend waiver
of second reading. Staff would also recommend lifting the
moratorium if the amendments are adopted.
i
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO ADDRESS THE
USE OF AWNINGS, CANOPIES AND MARQUEES AND TO CHANGE THE
NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS PERNIITTED IN THE
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subd. 13 of Subsection 460.03 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Subd. 13 Awnings, Canopies, or Marquees.
A. Awnings, canopies or marquees shall be considered as part of the wall
area and thus shall not warrant additional sign area.
B. Awnings, canopies or marquees constructed of transparent or translucent
material shall be deemed to be a sign panel for purposes of determining sign
area."
Section 2. Subd. 4 of Subsection 460.05 is hereby amended to provide that the
maximum number of freestanding signs allowed in the PCD -2 District shall be one per
building.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
adoption.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -9
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO
LIFT THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF PERAUTS FOR
SIGNS AND AWNINGS BY REPEALING SECTION 461
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 461 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
adoption.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $51000 ,
DATE: 7 June, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Articulated Sidewalk Plow
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Aspen Equipment 1. $ 49,483.00
2. McQueen Equipment 2. $ 59,734.00
3. Long Lake Tractor 3. $ 68,489.00
4. 4.
5. 5
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
McQueen Equipment $ 59,734.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for a sidewalk plow. The low bid did not meet
specifications. See attached information. The purchase will be
funded from the equipment replacement fund.
Sign ure/";
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within
Kenneth
Public Works - Streets
Department,,
City
Wallin,
Director
r
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 12, 1993
TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer & Director of Public Works
FROM: Steve Johnson, Purchasing
SUBJECT: TRACKLESS BID
Bids were opened on April 1, 1993 for one (1) articulated
sidewalk plow. Bids received were:
Long Lake Tractor $68,489
MacQueen Equipment $59,734
Aspen Equipment $49,483
The bid from Aspen Equipment does not meet specs in'several areas
including horsepower - 105 vs 78. Attachments must be
hydraulically driven, however, the sweeper attachment from Aspen
is mechanically driven. The snow blower from Aspen Equipment is
50" with a machine width of 51 ". MacQueen's snow blower is 51"
(meeting spec) with a machine width of 49 1/2" which would be the
correct measurement for proper snow clearing on a 60" sidewalk.
Therefore, I am recommending award of.the bid to MacQueen
Equipment - the lowest bidder meeting specification.
SJ /dj
A.1�
e N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15,000
DATE: May 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM v. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fqur -wheel Drive Utility Tractor with Cab/
Company Detachable Loader
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Scharber & Sons
1.
$22,500
2. Carlson Tractor & Equipment
2.
$33,426
3• Long Lake Tractor & Equipment
3.
$38,633
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Scharber & Sons $22,500
GENERAL INFORMATION:
TNeptPacemsentyhin the budget and is with a
trade -in
of a 1972 tractor.
Bid was for used tractors, limited to one
years old,
previously leased
tractors.
With the purchase of a used tractor, there is a savings of $5,000 to
$10,000 over a new tractor.
sfiapeor. recommended for purchase has been looked over and is in
L✓
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland
amn, rmance uirector
Manager
N REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Fred Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: May 26, 1993 AGENDA ITEM y.c
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Unleaded gasoline for Braemar Golf Course Maintenance
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
�. Rollins Oil Company not to exceed $13,000
(Hennepin Co. bid #2640A3 -232. Contract
date, May 1, 1993 to April 31, 1996.
Price.based on rack average price)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Rollins Oil Company ( Hennepin County Bid) not to exceed $13,000
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for year long purchase of unleaded gasoline to be delivered to
Braemar Golf Course maintenance.
The Recommended bid is
0
- .Y
within budget not
Kenneth
4,gl�jl,
� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Fred Richards and Council Mmembers
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: May 26, 1993 AGENDA ITEM V.D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fourth of July Fireworks at Cornelia Park
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc. 1. $7,300
2. (ONLY QUOTE RECEIVED) 2.
3. 3.
4. 4,
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc. $7,300
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc..has been doing the fireworks
display for the past 25 years and has been doing an excellant job.
$1,300.00 to be funded from contingencies.
Sign Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within Oudget Jq'bq Wallin, i it ance Director
Kenneth Rosland City
I
k
A.
A.
(e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 7 June, 1993
Subject: Curb Cut Request
on Thielen Avenue
from 5621 Wood Lane
St. Louis Park
Agenda Item #
VI.A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
El
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Review request for curb cut opening onto Thielen Avenue from 5621 Wood Lane
which is in St. Louis Park.
Info /Background:
As part of a new ordinance, residents must apply for curb cuts onto City
streets when replacing or adding new curb openings. A property owner at
5621 Wood Lane is applying to access Thielen Avenue for a garage installation
on the backside of the Wood Lane property. The applicant has submitted a
request and had appropriate surveying completed to determine if access is
possible. Also, staff has discussed this issue with the applicant. Staff
requested a letter from the applicant describing the understanding that the
applicant would be agreeing to if a curb cut was granted.
Certainly, there are residents on Thielen Avenue who would not like to
see an additional curb cut be granted. As such, this matter is being
referred to City Council for review. There is not a public hearing process
for curb cuts and normally are not controversial. The City Attorney and
Thielen neighbors may have additional comments. A location map, applicant's
letter and surveyor's letter are attached.
Mon;
oil
�'� /ICI �1 ' � �
MB
01000=0 BBBB'somm, m M
10000
ST
52ND S'
-:sF
W. •9 TM It
miLLTO• /y
CiT X.
HALL 6 PUBLIC
POLICELIS
ii DEPT
MNA
0 1
10 PUB L I C
a, WORKS
'D CENTER
DI NA COUN-
ry 10 t A MV
(.+
3 June 1993
St. Louis Park, MN 55436
Mr. Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, M - 55424
Mr. Hoffman;
As part of our recent application for a curb cut permit from the
City of Edina, we submit this letter to confirm our understanding of the
specific conditions suggested by staff.
The conditions specified as of 21 September 1992, and reiterated
by yourself during our conversation today, were as follows:
(A) Property irons to be located to ascertain that property abuts public
right-of-way.
The property was surveyed (by Egan, Field & Novak, Inc.)
and a copy of their findings has been submitted. No gap, platted or
surveyed, exists.
(B) The curb cut be on the east portion of the north end of Thielen.
As discussed today, we will restrict the driveway access to a
maximum width of 12 feet rather than 14 feet as was shown on the
contractor's plans, aligned with the east edge of the Thielen
Avenue asphalt.
(C) Landscaping be maintained or improved to continue neighborhood
aesthetics.
Discussion with our contractor revealed that some of the
existing vegetation can, and will be, saved. We will be constructing
decorative and privacy fencing, and will replace as much vegetation
as possible with plants we hope will be be more pleasing to us as
well as Thielen Av.
Also, as we discussed today, we do understand that because we will be
availing ourselves of City of Edina services by using Thielen Av. for
access, we would be subject to Thielen Av. assessments should the street
suffer construction or street improvements in the future.
A l , rie J. L d
r
FIELD
December 11, 1992
Robin Pinck
Stephanie Leckbank
5621 Wood Lane
St. Louis Park, Mn 55416
Re: Property line survey and research
Dear Ms Pinck and Ms Leckbank:
& NOWAK, INC,
FAX: (612) 5466839
As you requested we have surveyed your southerly property line and also
researched our files for any gap possibilities with properties adjacent to your
southerly property line. Your property is described as the east 50.00 feet of Lot 8,
Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside. The south line of Lot 8 is adjacent to the
north line of Thielen's Brookside. Our research indicates that Thielen's Brookside
and the Rearrangement of Block 4, Brookside are platted using a common line and
no platted gap exists. Research of our previous surveys within these two plats
does not reveal a gap existing between any monumentation found in the field. The
survey we recently performed in September, 1992 also found no gap in existing
monumentation between the two plats.
We hope this explanation answers any questions regarding this matter. If we can
assist you further please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Jack Bolke,
Vice President, COO
�y
I
AGENDA ITEM VI.A
%7J�t yo re a�I Gow�d.�.zE-
-�o GL �rnom�ot.Q.e.�.wrzv
j
z
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
TO PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THEILEN AVENUE
INTRODUCTION
Before the Edina City Council is an application from Stephanie
Leckband and Robin Pinck for a permit to install a private driveway
at the northern end of Theilen Avenue, a dead -end street in the
city of Edina. Leckband and Pinck are the owners of 5621 Wood Lane
in St. Louis Park. They have plans to build a new detached two car
garage on the property and wish to run a driveway from the garage
to Theilen Avenue, at the rear of their lot, instead of using their
current driveway accessing wood Lane.
The owners of the houses on Theilen Avenue oppose this
proposed driveway because of the substantial negative impact the,
proposed driveway would have on the character of Theilen Avenue,
the aesthetics of the area, and on property values of homes located
on the street. The garage will be set back only 15 feet from
Theilen Avenue, less than half the distance of the average set back
of all other structures on this street. Opening the end of the
street for this proposed driveway will alter the essential
character of Theilen Avenue, ruin the aesthetics of the street, and
harm the property values of the houses along the street.
The issue was raised before the St. Louis Park Board of Zoning
Appeals which gave preliminary approval to the plan, but expressly
reserved for the' City of Edina consideration of how the proposed
driveway would affect property on Theilen Avenue. Legally, Edina
has the discretion to deny the requested curb cut if the proposal
can be shown to have a negative impact on the surrounding property.
It does and the residents of Theilen Avenue request that the
council deny the requested permit.
FACTS
Theilen Avenue is one - block, dead -end street on the northern
edge of Edina. There are approximately 20 homes on the street.
Theilen Avenue ends at the St. Louis Park /Edina border.
Immediately south of the end of Theilen Avenue dead is 5621 Wood
Lane located in St. Louis Park. The house was bought by Stephanie
Leckband and Robin Pinck in 1985. At the time they purchased the
home and now, the house has had a 1 -1/2 car detached garage located
in what is considered the home's backyard; i.e. on the south side
of the property. The current driveway runs north from the garage
along the west side of the house to Wood Lane.
Two years ago, Leckband and Pinck decided to replace the
garage with a new, two car garage. They were told, however,
because the lot was adjacent to two streets, Wood Lane and Theilen,
it had "two front yards" and any new garage on the property would
require a variance because of the 35 foot front set back
requirements of St. Louis Park. Leckband and Pinck proposed to
build the garage with a 15 foot set back from Theilen Avenue. They
'4
also proposed,to access the garage from Theilen Avenue, abandoning
half of their old driveway and instead using as a side lot parking
area.
Leckband and Pinck obtained a variance to construct the
proposed garage. (See attached) In granting the variance,
however, the City of St. Louis Park clearly recognized the .possible
negative impact of the proposed new driveway into Theilen Avenue.
The City was presented with a petition signed by every resident of
Theilen Avenue opposing the proposed garage access from Theilen
Avenue for aesthetic and safety reasons. (Attached) Theilen
Avenue residents were present at the public hearing held on the
variance request, and their complaints about the proposal were
heard.
Although the St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals granted
the variance, it deferring to the City of Edina the issue of
whether access to the property would' be permitted from. Theilen
Avenue. As stated in the formal Report and Recommendation of the
City's Community Development Staff:
Edina officials are awaiting the outcome of
the variance request before making final
decision. In either event, whether the garage
access is from Wood Lane or Theilen Avenue is
not directly related to the variance. Access
to the proposed garage can be provided from
either road. The City of St. Louis Park does
not have any preference to either access.
The Citv of Edina must review the proposal to
determine if access from Theilen Avenue would
negatively impact the street. If so
determined the anplicants would still have
access to Wood Lane and the aaraae could still
be constructed as proposed.
(Attached) (emphasis added). The variance itself makes no mention
of access to the .garage. The St. Louis Park Board of Zoning
Appeals thus elected to defer to the City of Edina consideration of
the negative impact on Theilen Avenue properties of the proposed
access from Theilen Avenue to 5621 Wood Lane, thereby leaving Edina
with the option of deciding whether to accept the application of
Leckband and Pinck for a permit to build the proposed driveway.
That is the issue now before the Council.
JUIV 04 `Z43 09: 20 RBE H ri FT'i'S LHW
ISSUES
I. DOES THE CITY OF EDINA HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DENY
THE, REQUESTED PERMIT FOR A CURB CUT AT THE
NORTHERLY END OF THEILEN AVENUE?
II. WOULD THE PROPOSED ACCESS FROM THEILEN AVENUE TO
5621 WOOD LANE ALTER THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE
PROPERTY OR ITS SURROUNDINGS?
DISCUSSION
I. THE CITY OF EDINA HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DENY THE
REQUESTED PERMIT FOR A CURB CUT AT THE NORTHERLY
END OP THEILEN AVENUE.
P. 4/8
Concerns have been raised as to whether the City of'Edina has
the authority to deny the requested permit for a curb cut onto
Theilen Avenue. The answer to that question is unequivocally "yes"
for two reasons. First, Leckband and Pinck do not have a right of
access to Theilen Avenue because they are not owners of property
"abutting" Theilen Avenue in the legal sense of the word "abut."
Second, as a matter of comity, the City of St. Louis Park deferred
to the City of Edina the issue of the effect of the proposed
driveway on the neighboring property on Theilen Avenue, leaving
Edina with the discretion to deny the curb cut.
A. Leckband and Pinck, as St. Louis Park
Residents, Do Not Own Property That Abuts
Theilen Avenue in the Legal Sense Of the Term.
Generally, owners of property that abuts a public right of way
have a right of access to that right of way, subject to the police
and regulatory powers of the local government. The term "abutting
property" is a term of art in property law and means more than
property that is merely adjacent to a public right of way.
To be an "abutting" owner of property, one's ownership of the
property must somehow support or sustain travel on the street in
issue. See _Voss v. City Of Middleton, 470 N.W.2d 625, 631 (Wis.
1991). In a remarkably similar case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court
held that a landowner in the City of Madison.did not own property
"abutting" a street in the City of Middleton, even though that
property was physically adjacent to the Middleton street. The
Court stated, "where a landowner is not somehow supporting or
sustaining travel on the street, he is not an 'abutting, landowner"
within the meaning of the relevant statute. Id. The Court
continued:
A landowner's supporting or sustaining of
travel on a municipal street can be considered
to involve financial considerations. For one
thing, landowners in any given municipality
1
are financially responsible for maintenance of
and improvements to the municipality's
streets; a landowner within a given
municipality whose land is deemed to "abut" a
municipal street can be charged a special
assessment by the municipality for local
improvements to the street.
Id. at 631 -32.
Similarly, in Good Deal of Ivy Hill, Inc. v. City of Newar)�,
32 N.J. 263, 160 A.2d 630 (1960), the New Jersey Supreme Court held
that "the test to be applied * * * in deciding if plaintiff is an
abutting owner, is whether the property would be subject to an
assessment for construction or improvement of the street." 32 N.J.
at 269, 160 A.2d at 633.
The precise issue has never been squarely addressed in any
reported court case in this state. Courts from other
jurisdictions, however, overwhelmingly hold that the owner of
property at the end of a cul -de -sac is not an abutter. See, e.a.,
Friscoville Realty Co. v. Police Jury, 127 La. 318, 53 So. 578
(Sup. Ct. 1910) ; Kinashiahway Stpply Co. v. Banner Iron Works, 266
Mo. 138, 181 S.W. 30 (Sup. Ct. 1915); Goldrich v. Franklin Gardens
Corp., 282 App. Div. 698, 122 N.Y.S.2d 56 (1953); Thomas v. Julek,.
68 Wyo. 198, 231 P.2d 974 (Sup. Ct. 1951). It is only in cases in
which there was shown a past and regular use of the dead -end street
as a means of access to property that courts have determined that
such property abutted the street. see Messinger v. City of
Cincinnati, 36 Ohio App. 337, 173 N.E. 260 (Ct. App. 1930).
The clear weight of legal authority on the issue is that a
property owner in one municipality will not be deemed an abutting
property owner to a roadway located in and controlled by a
neighboring municipality, even if the property at issue -is
physically adjacent to the street. In the present case, Leckband
and Pinck do not have a right to the requested permit for a curb
cut on Theilen Avenue. Neither they nor their predecessors in
interest have ever paid property taxes or special assessments for
construction or repaving of the street, curbs, or sidewalks on
Theilen. They have paid no support for snow removal or other
maintenance on the street.
Leckband and Pinck have no claim of right to access to Theilen
Avenue because they have never used Theilen Avenue for motor
vehicle access to their property and have never provided financial
support for maintenance of the street. Given the objections of the
residents of Theilen Avenue and the clear showing that the proposed
driveway will alter the essential character of the surrounding
property on Theilen Avenue, the Council should deny Leckband and
Pinck's permit application.
B. The City of St. Louis Park Has Invited The
City of Edina Into The variance Application
Process By Expressly Deferring To The City of
Edina How The Proposed Driveway Would Affect
Property Fronting Theilen Avenue, And Leaving
Edina With the Option Of Denying The Curb Cut
Application.
As explained above, the City of St. Louis Park granted
Leckband and Pinck's request for a variance, leaving open to Edina
the option of denying the requested curb cut. The St. Louis Park
City Staff expressly reserved that issue for determination by the
appropriate authorities in the city of Edina. In essence, St.
Louis Park has invited Edina into its determination as to the
nature and extent of the variance. Clearly, Edina has the
authority to decide whether to grant the curb cut request under the
unique circumstances in this case.
II. THE PROPOSED ACCESS FROM THEILEN AVENUE TO 5621
WOOD LANE WILL ALTER THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF TEE
PROPERTY AND ITS SURROUNDINGS.
St. Louis Park granted the requested variance, but reserved
for Edina officials the discretion to deny the applicants the
proposed curb cut. Minnesota law is clear that a variance from a
zoning ordinance is to be granted only upon a showing that
compliance with an ordinance would cause undue hardship to the
property owner. See Krmtiotich v. City of Duluth, 474 N.W.2d 392
(Minn. Ct. App. 1991). Three factors determine whether there is
"undue hardship ": (1) "the property in question cannot be put to
a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls, (2) the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to the property not created by the landowner, and (3)
variance, if granted. will not alter the essential character of the
locality." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 (1992); see also Edina
City Ord. § 850.04, subd. 1(F).
The City of St. Louis Park granted the variance requested by
Leckband and Pinck, but expressly left for consideration by the
City of Edina how access from the garage to Theilen Avenue would
affect the third element of the "undue hardship" test - -the effect
of the proposed driveway on the essential character of the
locality.
It is self - evident that the proposed driveway will negatively
impact the essential character of the locality. Theilen Avenue is
a quiet, dead -end street in northeastern Edina. All of the roughly
20 homes along the street are single family homes with an average
setback of at least 30 -35 feet. Not a single lot is fronted by a
garage. Some homes have single attached garages, others have rear
yard garages.
Looking north down the street, one sees the. back of 5621 Wood
Lane and its current garage, which are screened by trees and by the
break created by the end of the street. There is no connection
between Theilen Avenue and 5621 Wood Lane; it is clear that the
house located at 5621 Wood Lane is part of the neighborhood
immediately to the north of Theilen.
The addition of a driveway for 5621 Wood Lane onto Theilen
will completely change the character of the street. 5621 Wood Lane
would necessarily become part of the Theilen Avenue neighborhood,
as are all other houses on the street with driveways to Theilen.
The problem is that unlike all the other houses on Theilen, 5621
Wood Lane does not face Theilen, it faces north. The part of the
lot closest to Theilen Avenue is unmistakably the home's backyard.
If the proposed driveway were installed, every time someone
drove north on Theilen, he or she would have to look directly in
the backyard or garage of' 5621 Wood Lane. Due to its unique
location, the most conspicuous house on the street would have its
backyard and garage facing the street. The present arrangement at
least provides foliage which screens•5621 from view; at.present the
home is hardly noticeable. Granting the requested curb cut would
change all of that.
Clearly, if a landowner proposed to raze a house on the east
side of Theilen and build a new home facing the creek instead of
the street, with a detached garage 15 feet from the street, such a
request would be summarily denied by the City. For the same
reasons, the requested curb cut should be denied to 5621 Wood Lane.
Zoning ordinances are enacted for aesthetic reasons as well as for
the health and welfare of an area. VanLandschoot v. City of
Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 503, 509 (Minn. 1983).
Edina should treat Leckband and Pinck's request as it would a
request for a variance, especially since St. Louis Park officials
expressly reserved for Edina the discretion to deny the requested
curb cut if the proposed driveway would negatively impact Theilen
Avenue properties. The proponent of a variance has a heavy burden
of showing that approval is appropriate, since a variance allows
property to be used in a manner forbidden by zoning ordinances.
Castle Design v. City of Lake Elmo, 395 N.W.2d 578, 581 (Minn. Ct.
App. 1986) ; Luger v. City of Burnsville, 295 N.W.2d 609, 612 (Minn.
1980).
Leckband and Pinck have not met their burden here. They
desire access to Theilen Avenue merely for their own convenience
and enjoyment. There is no evidence of undue hardship if the
request is denied. Significantly, denying Leckband and Pinck the
curb cut does not in any way deprive them of the use of their
property. They will continue to have access to Wood Lane, as they
and all their predecessors in interest have always had. In
contrast, granting the request would result in irreparable harm to
the property owners on Theilen Avenue. The Edina. City Council
should deny the request fora permit.
1-11 V_ JJ Vi' - __ 111 . . - . 1 -1.. i . V. '�J
CONCLUSION
The residents of Theilen Avenue do not object to the proposed
construction of the two car garage at 5621 Wood Lane. They do not
object to the variance allowing a 15 foot set back from Theilen
Avenue. Their only objection is to the.proposed 15 foot driveway
to the garage directly from the end of Theilen Avenue into the
garage. If allowed, such an arrangement would clearly have a
negative impact on the essential character of the street. The home
would stick out like a sore thumb on the most conspicuous lot on
the street. It would have a negative impact on property values
along the street, particularly at the north end of Theilen, harming
not only the economic interests of the residents of the street, but
upon the city in the form of decreased property tax revenues.
There clearly exists a rational, good faith basis to deny the
requested permit for the proposed driveway. Moreover, the law is
clear that the City has the authority, the right, and under the
unique and compelling circumstances of this case, the obligation to
deny the request for a curb cut permit given the great opposition
to the proposed driveway. Therefore, the residents of Theilen
Avenue respectfully request that the Edina City Council deny the
application of Stephanie Leckband and Robin Pinck for a permit to
install a driveway at the northerly and of Theilen Avenue.
49l'3j�f❑
o e T,`
C:
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council)
Agenda Item #
vi • B
From:
Francis Hoffman . i.
Consent
❑
City Engineer ' /
Information Only
❑
Date:
7 June, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Country Club District
❑
To Council
Traffic Study Update
Action
❑Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Review interim report. No action requested.
Info /Background:
City staff and consultant have been working with the neighbors and will
make a presentation at the Council meeting Monday evrfeing. Attached is
a status report which we well review at the meeting.
SRFSTRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ PARKING
SRF No. 0931752.1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fran Hoffman, P.E.
City of Edina
FROM: Dennis Eyler, P.E.
DATE: June 4, 1993
SUBJECT: EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY
STATUS REPORT AND OUTLINE OF PROJECT REPORT
Actions Completed:
The options for the reconstruction of Browndale Bridge were identified and
explored by the consultant.
2. A public meeting with the neighborhood presented the bridge options and served
as a forum for the residents to raise their concerns regarding traffic problems in
the neighborhood. A product of that meeting was realization that there was very
little support for widening the bridge to meet current standards for two -way traffic
flow. The Browndale Road residents also became aware that any option that
simply reduced the capacity of the bridge would create traffic impacts for other
streets in the neighborhood.
3. As a result of that meeting a committee was established, with representation
throughout the neighborhood, to identify the issues and to propose and evaluate
solutions to the traffic problems by working with City staff and the consultant.
The goal of the committee was to develop a list of possible actions that would be
widely accepted throughout the neighborhood and acceptable to the Edina City
Council.
4. An initial committee meeting produced a more detailed understanding of the
traffic problems. The traffic problems include: large volumes of through traffic,
speeding, poor stop sign compliance, poorly defined intersection controls at the
triangular intersections and pedestrian safety issues. The committee members
also stated what they thought were possible solutions to be investigated by staff
and the consultant.
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 -4443
(612) 475 -0010 FAX (612) 475 -2429
Fran Hoffman, P.E. - 2 - June 4, 1993
5. The City continued to collect traffic volume and speed data and the consultant
prepared a traffic flow computer model of the neighborhood in order to test the
effects of any proposed solutions.
6. A second committee meeting was held where there were discussions concerning
some of the possible solutions. Several alternative strategies were developed
and others suggested that would require further refinement by the consultant.
7. Current activity the consultant is refining the alternatives and beginning to run
the computer model to determine the effects of those alternatives. The
alternatives consist of options at Browndale Bridge coupled with traffic control
measures in and around the neighborhood along with measures to improve the
operations of the surrounding arterial roadways in order to encourage through-
traffic to remain on those routes where it belongs.
Future Activities
8. Complete testing of alternatives.
9. Meet with the committee to review the results of the testing. Refine current
alternatives or propose others for testing if results are not satisfactory.
10. Meet with the committee again if necessary.
11. Prepare final report with the proposed traffic control strategies and present those
items to the Council for their consideration. The plan of implementation will
reflect the difference between those measures that can be quickly implemented
versus those requiring construction.
COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY
REPORT OUTLINE
I. BACKGROUND OF STUDY AND TRAFFIC ISSUES
Through Traffic in Neighborhood
Speeding of Traffic
Controls of Intersection and Pedestrian Crossings
Operation of Browndale Bridge given Reconstruction Options
II. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES
A. Through Traffic
1. Total ins and outs 23,500
a. Local generated 8,000
b. Collector function of Wooddale 4,000
C. Frontage Road function of Browndale 2,000
d. Resultant "through" traffic 9,500
e. "Through" component on Browndale 1,325
2. Efforts to divert through- traffic
a. Close north access points
b. Ban Peak period left turns
C. One -way links
d. Increase number of stop signs
e. Reconfigure triangle intersections, i.e., at Browndale
and Country Club Road to require southbound traffic to
curve left and stop
f. Each of the above paired with each Browndale Bridge
option
3. Efforts to attract through- traffic back to 50th Street/France Avenue
a. Improved signal timing
b. Right turn improvement southbound at 49-1/2 & France
Avenue
C. Intersecting geometrics /right turn at 50th Street and Halifax
Avenue
d. Consider raising the speed limits on preferred routes
1
4. Browndale Bridge Options
a. One -way northbound
b. One -way southbound
C. Two -way (one direction at -a -time) operation with traffic
signal
d. Two -way (one direction at -a -time) operation with stop sign
for southbound traffic
e. Minor widening of the bridge to provide the minimum width
required to provide typical two -way operation.
f. Close the bridge to vehicular traffic (this option received
little support)
B. Speeding of Traffic
1. Speed Studies -- Ongoing but results to date show 85 percentile
speed is 31 mph, speed limit is 30.
2. Can character of streets and neighborhood justify consideration
of an area wide 25 mph zone -- legislation? Special dispensation
from Mn /DOT.
3. Issue of "speeding" may go away, if through - traffic is reduced.
4. Controlling speeds through roadway features may still be
required. Possible methods include converting triangular
intersection to standard "T" intersections, choker islands in mid
block to narrow the roadways. Speed humps and increased
enforcement.
C. Traffic Operations /Control
Several intersections were identified where additional traffic control may be
needed to improve pedestrian movements as well as create more orderly traffic
flows.
1. The triangular intersections with the Wooddale Country Club Road area
being of particular concern.
2. The Browndale - Edgebrook Place north intersection.
3. The Wooddale- Sunnyside area.
r.
III. DISCUSSION OF SOLUTIONS
A. Negative Impacts of Solutions
1. Increased travel time and distance to neighborhood residents.
2. Diversion of traffic from one neighborhood street to another.
3. Enforcement requirements given current resources.
4. Emergency vehicle response times.
5. Negative precident set for the Council to consider in dealing with
other neighborhoods in the future.
6. Costs.
B. Improvements to Arterials to Attract "Through" Traffic Back to Those
Roadways
C. Alternatives being Considered
1. Closing the three northern connecting streets.
a. Browndale between 44th and Sunnyside
b. Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside
C. Sunnyside between Arden and Grimes
2. Selected one -way roadways
a. Browndale between 44th and Sunnyside -- one -way
northbound
b. Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside one -way
northbound
C. Browndale Bridge -- one -way southbound
3. Left turn restrictions
a. Ban all left turns into the neighborhood during the peak
hours
b. Revise eastbound left turn signal at 50th and Wooddale to
allow turns on arrow only
K
4. Increase the number of stops for all possible route combinations
through the neighborhood in order to increase travel times to be
closer to those on the arterial roadways.
D. Results of the testing of alternatives
IV. RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
A. Items that can be quickly implemented
B. Mid term improvements requiring construction but possible to complete
this year
C. Long range improvements
V. CONCLUSIONS
4
as
e�
�r c
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
Director of Public [dories
Date: 7 June, 1993
Subject: Sewer Connection Charges
Dahlquist Addition
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # vI . c
Consent CI
Information Only [-j
Mgr. Recommends F7
To HRA
C
To Council
Action 7 !!
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Reaffirm City policy that connection charges on sanitary sewer or water
hook -ups continue to be the cost of the assessment plus interest on the
assessment cost from date of assessment to date of sewer and water
connection.
Info /Background:
With the approval of the Dahlquist Addition, four new lots were created to
access the existing sanitary sewer crossing over the existing Dahlquist
property. The new plat required a new road, new watermain, storm sewer and
relocating a portion of the sanitary sewer. As such, the above construction
costs are borne by the developer. Additionally, the City had not assessed
the Dahlquist property for any sanitary sewer when constructed twenty years
ago. The property was owned by Ruth Schaefer at the time. All others paid
an assessment of $1,838.57 per lot for sanitary sewer. Our policy is to
charge the cost of the assessment plus five percent interest on the assessment
to the date of hook -up. This is the standard used throughout the City for
any location.
In the Dahlquist Addition, four new lots hooked -up to the sewer line and
therefore, need to pay the principal of $7,354.28 for four hook -ups plus
5% interest until the date of hook -up. This results in an estimated sewer
hook -up charge of $19,000.00 for the four lots. The interest accrued over
twenty years since the original assessment.
(OVER)
Report /Recommendation
Agenda Item VI.C.
Page Two
Mr. Dahlquist feels that the price is too high, particularly with the fact
that Ruth Schaefer gave the City an easement to cross the property. This
easement allowed a shorter distance, thus less total construction cost. The
staff attaches two letters from Mr. Dahlquist which indicate his concern
that the interest charge should not go on forever or not be charged because
the existing property owner provided a service to the City.
Both Mr. Dahlquist and staff have researched Council minutes and project
documents, and we do not find any clear indication to what final disposition
should occur in this matter. Obviously, staff would follow normal procedure
and policy unless directed differently.
Staff is referring this to City Council for review of existing policy and
any change that Council may wish to consider on this issue.
5012 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN 55436
April 23, 1993
Mr. Fran Hoffman
City of Edina.
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a letter dated March
12, 1993, addressed to you.
Since the time I wrote that letter, I have given additional
thought to the matter of interest for some 20 years being added
to the sanitary sewer connection charges for our subdivision.
I hope the Edina City Council will give serious consideration
to this problem.
In order to reach an equitable solution, I believe it would
be helpful to go back again to the March 6, 1972 Edina Village
Council meeting at which the P -SS -303 project was adopted.
The sewer was urgently needed to eliminate severe pollution,
but there was a big problem, namely cost. The sewer line on
Ridge Road needed to be very deep to serve houses on the East
side and this is very costly. In addition, I suspect that this
would have been too deep to flow into the line on Interlachen
Boulevard without a lift station (expensive initially and
constantly.)
This situation made it necessary for the Edina Village
Engineer to design an alternate route serving the East side
houses from the rear, but this required running the line across
the land owned by Ruth Schaefer. Thus, she was drawn into the
project which was much more expensive than average. This is
because it meant putting in twice the length to serve the same
number of houses on Ridge Road, plus extending to Schaefer Road
(which part, incidentally, was the least expensive.) A look
at the map shows the double distance and also how the line
zig -zags through the back yards and every zig required a manhole,
a total of 21, while only 5 would have been required on Ridge
Road alone.
Under these circumstances, the Edina Village manager, Mr.
Warren Hyde, negotiated with Ruth Schaefer. Since both have
passed away, also Village Engineer, Mr. Robert Dunn, we have
only the records of the council meeting to rely on. Mr. Hyde's
statement, quoted from the minutes, follows: "Six lots are
deferred and those lots will pay the connection charge if and
when the property is subdivided."
It is clear that "if and when" gives complete freedom to
the land owner to decide about subdivision. However, adding
the burden of a constantly increasing interest charge takes
away from that freedom and actually makes "if and when" almost
meaningless.
It is most significant that Mr. Hyde made no mention of
interest. In agreements where interest is to be charged, it
always is carefully specified. Since this was not done, we
can only assume that they agreed there would be no interest.
My dictionary defines "defer" as to put off to a future
time. How can interest be charged on an assessment that hasn't
yet been made?
In the notice of public hearing signed by Mr. Robert C.
Dunn, mailed to residents prior to the hearing of March 6, 1972,
it also states it is proposed that assessments against properties
not directly abutting Ridge Road would be deferred until
connections are made. It also states that interest charged
on the unpaid balance will not exceed 7 %. This indicates two
things:
1. He was well aware that interest is an important factor.
2. He would have stated PAYMENTS would be deferred if
it was intended to charge interest. The fact that he wrote
ASSESSMENTS would be deferred has a totally different connotation
regarding when the charges would be effective.
What did the land owner get from this agreement? The
figures are in the first letter mentioned above. Suffice it
to say the total costs are about double what the cost would
be, even at today's prices, to install a simple system connected
to the sewer main in Schaefer Road. We did agree to relocate
a portion of the existing line at our expense and will do so,
but it still is an expense that would not occur if the present
line never had been built.
The Village of Edina, acting for the residents of Ridge
Road, saved them a bundle of money, and this is commendable.
However, I relieve it is very unfair to the present owners of
the Schaefer property to be required now to pay $9222 per
connection as a result of a favor done by Ruth Schaefer 21 years
ago. This compares to the charge of $4036 per connection to
the lots on Ridge Road. Please find a way to save the present
owners of the former Schaefer property from being treated so
unfairly.
Please give this matter your immediate attention.
Very truly y urs,
Mark S. Dalqu /st
5012 Schaefer Road
Edina, MN 55436
March 12, 1993
Mr. Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
We have spoken of this matter in the oast and you're
familiar with the details. I have decided it might be helpful
if I put in a letter some thoughts I have on the charges the
City of Edina is contemplating for sewer connections in the
Dalquist subdivision.
First, I believe we can reasonably assume that Edina Manager
Mr. Warren Hyde and the then -owner of the property, Mrs. Harold
(Ruth) Schaefer, reached an agreement regarding the sewer line
easement that would be beneficial to both parties. Edina
benefited by realizing substantial savings for the benefited
property owners and Ruth Schaefer benefited by being assured
of sewer connections at a fixed price, not subject to inflation
and interest, whenever she decided to subdivide. It was a win -
win situation. The minutes of the Edina Village Council meeting
on Monday, March 6, 1972 stipulated: The total estimated
construction costs $117,038.41, proposed to be assessed against
29 assessable lots at an estimated per cost of $4,035.80. To
quote Mr. Warren Hyde, "Six lots are deferred and those lots
will pay the connection charge if and when the property is
subdivided." Nothing was said about interest.
However, we are presently being asked to pay over twice
as much as the original agreement provided. I believe it would
be totally unfair to charge us a greater amount than it would
cost us (assuming the present sewer line had never been
installed) to install our own line, even at present -day prices.
I have ball -park figures that come to about $27,000 for
such an installation, including the Schall house. The information
I have now indicates that we would have to pay over $55,000
broken down as follows:
5 connections, $20,000.
Relocate a section of the present line, 18,000.
Interest 17,331.
For the present owners to have to pay an extra $28,000 plus,
for a favor done for Edina 20 years ago seems patently unfair
to me. I hope you will make every possible effort to rectify
this situation.
Sincerely,
Mark S. Dalquist
Tel..938 -4402, home
927 -7996, ext. 315, office
Copy to Mr. Ken Rosland
�gZr1A.
o e
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Richards and City Council
Agenda Item #
VI.
D
From: Bob Kojetin
Consent
❑
Information Only
Fx]
Date: June 3, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Senior Center
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
At one of the past city council meetings the question of the relationship
and the programs that are being held at the Senior Center in the Community
Center was discussed. At this time I am enclosing a copy of the program
and the operation that has occurred over the past 12 months when we
officially moved into the new location at the Community Center.
EDINA SENIOR CENTER AND
EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION COOPERATIVE PROGRAMING
The Edina Senior Center and Edina Community Education programs have enjoyed a mutually beneficial
relationship in the development of classes and programs designed for senior citizens.
One of the earliest cooperative programs was the evening travelogue series, which was well attended for
several years. In 1982 the woodshop was made available for seniors' use. The Director of Community Education
and Director of the Senior Center collaborated in designing and implementing this program that has served
seniors for the last decade. In 1986 the same directors shared ideas and facilities in making the popular
Defensive Driving program available to seniors.
The Edina Senior Center moved to the Community Center in January of 1989. One of our first tasks was
to reach an agreement with Community Education with regard to classes held at our previous location (7151
York). The city and the school district reached a verbal agreement which follows:
*The city will not offer any classes on a permanant basis, only experimental
•Community Education will not offer trips and tours
As a result of this agreement:
*The Senior Center turned over:
•Beginning and Intermediate Bridge with Louise Rossini
•Whittling with Bill Jaglo,
*Swedish Exercise with Margret Nelson
*All 55+ classes would be co- sponsored by Community Education and the Senior Center. (see enclosed
sheet #1)
*Community Education would take care of registration, costs and advertising. All monies would go to
them.
•The Senior Center would advertise in its monthly brochure and would provide space in the Senior
Center when needed and available. (see enclosed sheet #2A & 2B)
•Experimental classes may be started by the Senior Center and, if found successful, are turned over to
Community Education, examples:
*Line Dancing
•Gems
e Upon request Community Education will set up classes for the Senior Center, examples:
•Tai Chi
•Creative Writing
•Clogging
In June of 1992 the Senior Center was moved to -its present location. The new facility accommodates a
number of varied activities because of optimal use of overall space. We now have five smaller rooms compared
to the one large room available earlier. Fourteen new programs have been initiated in the past ten months. (see
enclosed sheet #3)
The relationship between the Senior Center and Commmunity Education is cooperative rather that
competitive. Our mutual respect has enabled both facilities to provide a comprehesive array of programs and
classes to best serve our senior population in Edina.
Beauty For the Mature Woman
Come and learn the special secrets of
skin care and makeup artistry for women
who are "fifty to eighty- something ".
We'll talk about shape of glasses,
hairstyles, and other unique concerns.
#9047A Friday January 29
10:00 -11:30 a.m. Connie Larson
1 session. $12 Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
Bridge with Louise - Beginning
Let our Life Master and bridge teacher
extraordina!re teach you the basics of
this fascinating card game. Learn to bid
and to play modern bridge in ten easy
lessons - the FUN WAY.
#9001A Thursdays Jan. 21-Mar. 25
10:00 a.m. -Noon Louise Rossini
10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
Bridge with Louise -
Intermediate
Put more fun and skill Into your bridge
game. This course includes review of the
basics followed by some advanced
techniques In play and defense.
#9041A Tuesdays Jan. 19 -Mar. 23
1:00 -3:00 p.m. Louise Rossini
10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
#90416 Thursdays Jan. 21 -Mar. 25
1:00 -3:00 p.m. Louise Rossini
10 sessions - $20 Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
Coping With Change
Everything changes and usually takes us
by surprise even when we think we're
prepared for It. Discover why change is
so hard and how you can help yourself.
By exploring some predictable patterns,
you can better chart your coursr
through the unfamiliar terrain of
change. Come for a lively discussion
with your contemporaries. The Instruc-
tor is on the faculty of the College of St.
Catherine and Is the director of "Aging
Well," a wellness consulting service.
#9093A Mondays March 1 & 8
9:30.11:00 a.m. Carol Walker
2 sessions - $8 Edina Comm. Center
Door 4, Room 341
Creative Writing
Get started on the "write" way to
remember. Memories and old times will
come alive through the writing process.
Your friends and family will enjoy
seeing and hearing your stories. Write
nowl
#9083A Thursdays February 4-25
1:00 -3:00 p.m. Shirley Whiting
4 sessions - $18 Edina Comm. Center
Boor 2, Room 306
Exercise for 55f
Exercise is so important for good health!
Relax, stretch, and build your strength
and stamina in a pleasant environment
with your contemporaries. You will
work at your own pace. Please bring a
mat or large towel. Carol Walker is 55+
herself and is director of "Aging Well," a
wellness consulting service.
#9017A Fridays Feb. 12 -Mar. 26
8:30.9:30 a.m. Carol Walker '
7 sessions - $12 Edina Comm. Center
Door 9, Room 235
Line Dancing
Get on the Line Dancing bandwagon!
Dapce without a partner. Eastern and
copntry western line dancing Is fun, and
good exercise. Easy, step -by -step instruc-
tion will have you doing the hottest
trend in dancing. Wear tennis shoes.
Section A at 11:30 is for advanced
students, Sections B and C are for
continuing students. We will review and
learn new dances. Beginners are wel-
come in Section B. Written Instruction
and music Is available so you can
practice at home.
#9079A Thursdays Jan. 28-Mar. 18
11:30am- 12:30pmFran DeWell
(Advanced) Edina Comm. Center
8 sessions - $20 ) Door 2, Room 301
#90796 Thursdays
Jan. 28-Mar. 18
12:45 -1:45 p.m.
Fran DeWell
(Cont. & Beg.)
Edina Comm. Center
8 sessions - $20
Door 2, Room 301
#9079C Thursdays
Jan. 28-Mar. 18
2:00.3:00 p.m.
Fran DeWell
(Continuing)
Edina Comm. Center
8 sessions - S20
Door 2, Room 301
Defensive Driving 55t
Minnesota State law requires insurance
companies to offer a 10% discount for
three years to drivers over 55 who
complete this course. It has no connec-
tion with your driving record and does
not involve any driving or testing.
Developed by the National Safety
Council, the Defensive Driving course
has a proven record of accident and
traffic violation reduction. You will
receive a certificntle of completion to
provide to your insurance company.
Please indicate your driver's license
number on your registration form.
'Tuition covers course materials and
lunch. Co- sponsored by the MN Safety
Council.
#9005A Mon. & Tues. Jan. 25 & 26
10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions • $22'
#9005B Thurs. & Fri. Feb. 18 & 19
10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22'
09005C Mon. &Tues. March 8 & 9
10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22'
#9005D Mon. & Tues. March 29 & 30
10:00 am -3:00 pm 2 sessions - $22'
All Defensive Driving claasses meet at the Edina
Community Center room 350 with instructor Bob
Vandenberg.
Dad Had Skinny Legs...
And Other Family Tales
Discover easy, creative ways to capture
your favorite family stories now, before
they're lost. Geared for nonwriters of all
ages, this class shows you how to jog
memories (yours and others), gather
stories and package them in attractive
ways. 'A "Do- It- Yourself Family Histories
Book" ($11) Is Included in the tuition.
Nancy Pengra Is the owner and founder
of Family Histories, a business that helps
people preserve their life stories.
#8016A Friday February 5
9:00 -11:30 a.m. Nancy Pengra
1 session - $18' Edina Comm. Center
Door 4, Room 341
18016M Thursday February 18
6:30.9:00 p.m. Nancy Pengra
1 session - $18' Edina Comm. Center
Door 4, Room 341
* See the back of this flyer for more classes and registration Information
Modeling + Acting for the
Mature Talent
The Twin Cities market Is in need of the
"mature talent" - both men and women.
If you've ever thought about getting
involved in the commercial, film, or
odeling Industry, now is the time to
pursue your dreams. Find out more from
a model who runs her own model
management company in the area.
#9073A Friday February 5
10:00.11:30 a.m. Sheryl Sigfridson
1 session - $8 Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
m-_ri `,,red Not Tired!
ii °r =.z` =e retired, about to retire, or just
thinking about re!;:j� rent, you'll want
to make the best uz& of your new -found
time and I;! -.,standing talent In ways
that are il-1ying for you. Check out
your .- % : °fives for a possible new
car;, 3rri how to slow down or shift
Re- c stay productive. Discover
D best use career and volunteer
z-se. Don't wonder what it would
.i:e to "do something" again! Do Itl
.-.;t of handouts ($2) is Included in the
ion. Sharon Sundre isn't retired yet,
i,::t she enjoys thinking about it! She is a
career consultant and former English
teacher.
99095A Monday March 15
9:30 -11:30 a.m. Sharon Sundre
1 session - S9' Edina Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
Soft Aerobics For 55+ IGHq
Gentle on your Jointsl This class in-
cludes a warm -up, strengthening phase,
20 -25 minutes of low Impact (no
bounce) aerobics and a cool down/
relaxation phase. Please bring a small
mat and wear tennis or aerobic shoes.
#9029A Mon. & Wed. Jan. 25 -Mar. 24
9:00.10:00 a.m. Grace Wagnild
(No Class Feb. 15) Edina Comm. Center
17 sessions - $29 Door 2, Room 301
#90296 Tuesdays Jan. 2&Mar.16
8:15.9:15 a.m. Bette Hostad
8 sessions - $14 Edina Comm. Center
Door 9, Room 235
Should I Sell My House?
The decision to sell your home can seem
overwhelming, especially when you
have been out of the real estate market
for some time. Learn about the "process"
of selling your home, Including inspec-
tions, purchase agreements and more.
Come and get your questions answered.
19081A Monday January 2S
10:00 -1130 a.m. Sue Corson
1 session - $4 Edina_ Comm. Center
Door 2, Room 311
Whittling Group
Join fellow wood carvers on Tuesday
afternoons to share ideas and learn from
each other. Everyone is welcome - from
beginner to advanced whittlers. (During
spring quarter we will have whittling
class with an instructor.)
#9037A Tuesdays Jan. 12 -Mar. 23
1:00.3:00 p.m. Volunteers
11 ses. - $5 dues Edina Comm. Center
Door 6, Room 159
Swedish Fitness II
Come for the fun and health benefits of
this low intensity class for men and
women. Work at your own pace on
flexibility, light aerobics, strength and
relaxation activities set to music. Bring a
mat and wear loose fitting clothes and
tennis shoes.
#9033A Mondays Jan. 25 -Mar. 22
8:00.9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson
(No Class Feb. 15) Edina Comm. Center
8 sessions - $16 Door 9, Room 235
#9033M Tuesdays Jan. 26 -Mar. 23
6:00.1:00 p.m. Margret S. Nelson
9 sessions - $16 Edina Comm. Center
Door 9, Room 235
#9033B Wednesdays Jan. 27 -Mar. 24
8:00.9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson
(No Class Feb. 10) Edina Comm. Center
8 sessions - $16 Door 9, Room 235
09033C Thursdays Jan. 28 -Mar. 25
8:00 -9:00 a.m. Margret S. Nelson
9 sessions - $16 Edina Comm..Centet -..,
Door 9, Room 235°
Tennis for 55+
Brush up on your tennis skills. For
senior players of any level. Our pro will
give you an ability rating and help you
find places to continue to play tennis
this winter. Bring your racquet and a
new can of balls.
#9049M Tuesdays Jan. 26 -Feb. 23
SAS -6:45 p.m. Nick Pappas
5 sessions - $20 Edina High School
Door 7, Field House
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
24 Hour Registration Hotline
Call 220 -4644 anytime with your touch tone
phone. Have your VISA /Mastercard and course
information ready.
By Mail
Just fill out the form and mall It with your check or
charge card number to:
Edina Community Education Services
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
By Phone
Have your VISA or Mastercard number ready when
you call us at 927-9725. Office hours are Monday
through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
In Person
Visit our office at the Edina Community Center.
Park at the north entrance and enter:door K,
Make your check payable to: Edina Public Schools.
-----------------------
REGISTRATION FORM FOR ADULT CLASSES
I I
Name I
I Address - --
I
CRY zip I
I Home Phone Work Phone I
I Age Group: _ 19 -54 years 55 years & over
I COURSE # COURSE TITLE BEG. DATE TIME FEE i
I $ I
I �
I
TOTAL........ ..............................5 —
Charge to my 0 Mastercard Visa Account
Charge Card Number -
I Ems. Date — — Sgna— — — — —
RO
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WED AY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
URDAY
311
*Great Book
*Swedish
*Open bridge
*Beginning Bridge
*Beauty for the
JADE
Discussion
*Intermediate
*Intermediate
Mature woman
•U of M visit to
Bridge
Bridge
0500
Sr. Center
303
*Taxes
•Blood Pressure
*Taxes
•Spelling /Scrabble
•Chorus extra
*Showtime /Charac
PLATINUM
*Chorus
•Softball
rehearsals
ters for Stage
*Meaningful
Registration
*Book Club
Media
+MRPA meetings
*Harmonikers
+ARLE meetings
*Newsletter
*In Depth
assembly
Relaxation
"TCPC
306
•Caregivers
*Western - Jewerly
*Grandmothers
*Computer
•Podiatrist
ROSE
*Applique
for Peace
*Creative Writing
*Slide
*Hearing test
presentation
N
D
304
work room
work room
work room
work room
work room
PEACH
coffeelvisiting
coffee /visiting
coffee /visiting
coffee /visiting
coffee /visiting
area/small
area/small
area
area
area
meetings
meeting
*Sr. Advisory
*Sr. Golf Board
*Softball Planning
Council
meeting
meeting
*Bowling Banquet
meeting
308
sopen pool
*open pool
*open pool
•open pool
•open pool
EMERALD
KEY
• Senior Activities
+ Adaptive Recreation Programs
* Community Education Class
The above diagram indicates usage of Senior Center rooms by Senior Programs, Adaptive
" Independent Group
Programs, Community Education and Independent Programs during the month of April 1993
COORDINATION OF PROGRAMS BETWEEN SENIOR CENTER AND
COMMUNITY EDUCATION
In addition to the regular Senior Program schedule, the following spring Community
Education Classes were offered in the Senior Center.
JADE - 311
Beginning Bridge
Intermediate Bridge
Swedish
Beauty for the Mature Woman
Acting for the Mature Woman
PLATINUM - 303
In Depth Relaxation
Showtime /Characters for Stage
Meaningful Media
ROSE - 306
Creative Writing
How to Sell Book Ideas
Western Jewelry Making
Applique
Classes that have transferred from the Senior Program to Community Education.
1. Bridge with Louise
Beginning
Intermediate
2. Whittling
3. Swedish Exercise
Active
Less Active
4. Line Dancing
Beginning
Intermediate
5. Gems /Tap Group
6. Informational meetings regarding Wills, Estate
Planning, Investments, etc.
Classes requested by Senior Program but given through Community Education.
1. Defensive Driving
2. Tai Chi
3. Craft Classes
Punch Embroidery
Sweatshirt Decorating
Beading
4. Relaxation
5. Creative Writing
6. Social Dance #2B
EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Edina Senior Center - Recreation Program
Membership: 1460 seniors
CURRENT SENIOR PROGRAMS
Regional Chapter of Metropolitan Senior Federation
C. ROGRAMMED WITH PLATINUM ROOM - 303
COMMUNITY EDUCATION Performing Senior Band
Tap Dancing Instructions Senior Singing Group
Whittling Instructions Monthly Newsletter assembly
Wood Shop Various Volunteer work
Bridge Instructions . Piano Duets -NEW
Exercise Instructions Free income tax service
Craftmaking Instructions Annual Spelling Bee
Defensive Driving Instructions Intergenerational Spelling Bee
Creative Writing Class -NEW Advisory Council -NEW
Line Dancing -NEW Volunteer .Recognition
Motivational /Informational Speakers
EDINBOROUGH PARK Senior Workshops
Trips and Tours Scrabble -NEW
Men's Volleyball Group Spelling Skills Group
Birthday Celebration(4 times) Community Ed. 55+ Classes
Line Dancing Party(4 times) -NEW
VAN VALKENBURG PARK
Men's Softball League
C 'HTOWN BOWL
b. _ag League
Open Bowling
COMMUNITY CENTER AUDITORIUM
Performing Senior Tap Group
Men's Tap Dancing Group -NEW
Beginning Tap for Performing -NEW
Gems
Annual Variety Show
Speakers
RICH ACRES GOLF COURSE
Golf League
1994 at Normandale -NEW
COMMUNITY CENTER ENTRYWAY
Flu Shot Clinic
Commodities Distribution
Annual Holiday Bazaar
VARIETY OF PLACES
V " ig Group
Knitting for Childrens Home
7151 York
Senior Luncheon
ROSE ROOM -306
Computer Interest Group
Problem solving with on -site computer -NEW
Caregivers Support Group -NEW
Photo Group /Slide Presentations
Blood Pressure Checks
Hearing Tests
Podiatrist
Grandmothers for Peace -NEW
Book Club -NEW
Community Ed. 55+ Classes
JADE ROOM - 311
Great Book Discussion Group -NEW
Bridge
500
Community Ed. 55+ Classes
EMERALD ROOM - 308
Billiards
FUTURE PROGRAMS
Full Time Secretary
Current Affairs Discussion Groups
Library
Quilt Instruction and Assembly
Billiard Instructions
Open Card Day
Clogging
Senior Community Sing -in
#3 Amateur Performing night or day
oe"
0
• ,N�bRPOMtit'V •
age
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: TED PAULFRANZ, FIRE CHIEF
Date: 14AY 10, 1993
i
Subject: FIRE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
AND FIRE EDUCATION DISPLAI
JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VI . F
Consent Ii
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends j17 To HRA
!I To Council
Action `! Motion
x Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Adoption of attached resolution and approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement and
Fire Education Display Joint Services Agreement.
Info /Background:
The attached agreements are the result of the combined efforts of numerous
individuals, including fire chiefs, city manager, city attorneys and others.
(See attached memorandum.)
J.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 10, 1993
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: MAJOR OBJECTIVES INVOLVED IN RE -WRITE
OF MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
The following items represent the primary issues causing us to re -write the
existing Mutual Aid document:
1. This new document is a restructuring of an existing agreement. This
re -write is prepared in terms understandable to the users, Fire Chiefs. We
are not creating a new public policy or association. The original document
dates from 1949. What is developed is a new system to make sharing
resources easier. The agreement itself is designed to give general legal
authority for mutual aid.
2. This Agreement is a framework document which is specifically written to be
broad based and flexible. The details will be contained in the Association
rules; currently our by -laws.
3. The Agreement was written to reflect the changing roles and
responsibilities of our fire departments. It allows us to share resources
and cooperate in emergency, non - emergency, specialized and extraordinary
activities, as defined.
4. There are provisions in the agreement for the billing of costs involved
with specialized and extraordinary activities. Our intent is that this
charge would only be for those specialized activities, not traditional
mutual aid.
S. This is a Joint Powers Agreement but it does not create a joint powers
organization. The Association will own no property nor will it dispense
funds, other than nominal amounts for administration.
6. The name of the organization was changed from the Southwest Fire League to
the Southwest Mutual Aid Association.
7. Appendix "A" for the new agreement includes the City of Excelsior.
8. Under Section VI, provision has been made to provide for reciprocal defense
and indemnification of the parties to this agreement. Our purpose and
intent is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating
conflict between the parties.
9. The purpose of the second agreement enclosed is to allow Minnetonka to own
the Fire Safety House. It is not appropriate for the Association to own
property.
TRP /ras
PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City of has previously approved
and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the southwest
suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire
personnel and equipment;
WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have
been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; and
WHEREAS, the participating agencies have determined that it is
advisable to clarify and simplify the language of that agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of , Minnesota, that the revised Southwest
Mutual Aid Association Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of
Fire Personnel and Equipment, a copy of which is attached, is
hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating
member of the Association.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association
Personnel And Equipment Agreement EXHIBIT A
City of Bloomington:
City of Minnetonka:
Bloomington Fire Dept.
Minnetonka Fire Dept.
2215 Old Shakopee Rd.
14550 Minnetonka Blvd.
Bloomington, MN 55431
Minnetonka, MN 55345
City of Chanhassen:
City of Plymouth:
Chanhassen Fire Dept.
Plymouth Fire Dept.
7610 Laredo Dr., Box 97
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Plymouth, MN 55447
City of Eden Prairie:
City of Richfield:
Eden Prairie Fire Dept...
Richfield Dept. of Pub. Safety
7801 Mitchell Rd.
6700 Portland Ave.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Richfield, MN 55423
City of Edina:
City of St. Louis Park:
Edina Fire Dept.
St. Louis Park Fire Dept.
6250 Tracy Ave.
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
Edina, MN 55436
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
City of Excelsior:
City of Wayzata:
Excelsior Fire Dept.
Wayzata Fire Dept.
339 3rd Street
600 Rice St.
Excelsior, MN 55331
Wayzata, MN 55391
City of Golden Valley:
Metropolitan Airport Commission:
Golden Valley Fire Dept.
Airport Fire Dept.
7800 Golden Valley Rd.
6307 34th Ave. S.
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Minneapolis, MN 55440
City of Hopkins:
V.A. Fort Snelling
Hopkins Fire Dept.
Fire Dept. /138 Bldg. 70
1010 1st St. S.
One Veterans Drive
Hopkins, MN 55343
Minneapolis, MN 55417
3 -4-93
Southwest Mutual Aid Association
joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of
Fire Personnel And Equipment
I. PURPOSE
This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, which authorizes
the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to contracting Parties. The Parties to this
Agreement wish to create a regional Mutual Aid Association, hereafter called the Southwest
Mutual Aid Association, for the purpose of making equipment, personnel and facilities available to
each other upon request. This Agreement is intended to give each Party the authority to send its
equipment and personnel into the other communities and to provide for an Operating Committee
to administer this Agreement.
II. DEFINITION OF TERMS
For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the
meanings given them below.
Subd. 1. "Assistance" means the providing of fire personnel and equipment, fire
investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training personal and
associated equipment and facilities.
Subd. 2. "Emergency" means a sudden and unforeseen situation requiring immediate action.
Subd. 3. "Party" means a governmental unit which is a Party to this Agreement.
Subd. 4. "Requesting Official" means the person designated by a Party who is responsible
for requesting Assistance from other Parties.
Subd. 5. "Requesting Party" means a Party which requests Assistance from other Parties.
Subd. 6. "Responding Official" means the person designated by a Party who is responsible
to determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a
Requesting Party.
Subd. 7. "Responding Party" means a Party which provides Assistance to a Requesting
Party.
Subd. 8. . "Specialized Activities" means non - emergency Assistance to include but not be
limited to: fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training
personal and associated equipment and facilities.
Subd. 9. "Extraordinary Services" means emergency Assistance that includes activities
beyond the normal scope of fire fighting, such as hazardous materials incidents,
high level rescue, or dive rescue.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493
Page 2
III. PARTIES
The Parties to this Agreement are listed on attached Exhibit A and constitute the
membership the Southwest Mutual Aid Association.
Other entities may become a Party to this Agreement by complying with the conditions
provided in the Association rules and by applying to and receiving approval of all member Parties.
Any Party may withdraw from membership at any time upon thirty days written notice to the other
members. Action by any Party which is required or. permitted under this Agreement will be
evidenced by:
• for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or
• for a non - municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that
party which recites the basis of that authority.
IV. PROCEDURE
Subd. 1. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for Assistance
from other Parties, such Requesting Official may, at his /her discretion, call upon the Responding
Official of any other Party to furnish Assistance to and within the boundaries of the Requesting
Party. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, it is the intention of the Parties to this Agreement
to cooperate in the event of an emergency by making the necessary Assistance available to a
Requesting Party without undue delay.
Subd. 2. Upon the receipt of a request for Assistance from a Party, the Responding Official
may authorize and direct the Fire Department personnel under his /her control to provide
Assistance to the Requesting, Party. Whether the Responding Party provides such Assistance to
the Requesting Party and, if so, to what extent such Assistance is provided shall be determined
solely by the Responding Official (subject to such supervision and direction as may be applicable
to him /her within the governmental structure of the Party by which he /she is employed). Failure to
provide Assistance will not result in liability to a Party.
Subd. 3. When a Responding Party provides Assistance under the terms of this
Agreement, it may in turn request Assistance from other Parties as "backup" during the time that it
is providing Assistance outside its boundaries.
Subd. 4. Whenever a Responding Party has provided Assistance to a Requesting Party, the
Responding Official may at any time recall such Assistance or any part thereof if the Responding
Official in his /her best judgment deems such recall necessary to provide for the best interests of
his /her own community. Such action will not result in liability to any Party.
Subd. 5. The Requesting Party shall be in command of the emergency scene. The
personnel and equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be under the direction and
control of the Requesting Party until the Responding Official withdraws Assistance.
Subd. 6. A Responding Party shall be responsible for its own personnel, equipment, and for
injuries or death to any such personnel or damage to any such equipment, except that unused
equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be returned to the Responding Party by the
Requesting Party when circumstances permit this to be done. Responding personnel shall be
deemed to be performing their regular duties for the Responding Party. Insurance coverage and
any financial compensation shall be the responsibility of the Responding Party. Each Party waives
the right to sue any other Party for any workers compensation benefits paid to its own employee or
volunteer even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party,
its officers, employees, or volunteers.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493
Page 3
Subd. 7. Specialized activities of a non- emergency nature may be requested and/ or
provided by the Parties to this Agreement.
Subd. 8. No charge shall be made to a Party for Assistance rendered under this Agreement
except that a Party providing Assistance shall be paid for the cost of supplies. A Party providing
Assistance may charge for time and materials for Specialized Activities and Extraordinary Service
as provided for in the association rules.
V. OPERATING COMMITTEE
The association shall have an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement.
Subd. 1. The Chief of each Party's Fire Department, or designee, shall be the Party's
representative to the Association Operating Committee.
Subd. 2. It is the responsibility of the Operating Committee to establish rules, policies, and
standards and to take other necessary or prudent action to administer this Agreement.
Subd. 3. The Operating Committee shall meet periodically, but not less than quarterly to
conduct the business of the Association.
Subd. 4. The Association is not a separate legal entity. The Operating Committee shall
have no authority to own property, enter into contracts, or to receive and expend funds except for
routine administrative expenses.
VI. RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION
The Requesting Party agrees to indemnify and defend against any claims brought or
actions filed against the Responding Party or any officers, employees, or volunteers of the
Responding Party for injury or death to any third person or persons, or damage to the property of
third persons, arising out of the performance and provision of Assistance in responding to a
request for Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement.
The intent of the indemnification requirement of this section is to impose on each
Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify any Responding Party for claims arising
within the Requesting Party's jurisdiction subject to the liability limits under Chapter 466,
Minnesota Statutes. The purpose of creating these reciprocal duties to defend and indemnify is to
simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit
liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single
attorney.
Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay, on behalf of itself and
other Parties, any amounts in excess of the liability limits established in Chapter 466, Minnesota
Statutes, applicable to only one Party. The limits of liability for some or all Parties may not be
added together to increase the maximum statutory liability limits for any Party.
VII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all of the Parties listed on the attached
Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein. Each Party shall execute a separate
signature page and forward that page to the Association Secretary, along with a resolution or letter
as provided in Section III. Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a
copy of the fully executed agreement to each .member.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3 -493
Page 7
Date: CITY OF EDINA
By
Its
And
Its
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 3-4-93
Southwest Allutual Aid Association
Joint Services Agreement For Use Of
Fire Education Display
1. Parties. The Parties to this Agreement are the members of the Southwest Mutual
Aid Association (the "Association "), as may be now constituted or hereafter revised.
Any Party which joins.the Association after the execution of the Joint And Cooperative
Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment shall automatically be a Party to
this Agreement.
2. Background. The Association has obtained a fire education display in the form of a
small house on a movable trailer (the "display "). This Agreement is intended to clarify
ownership and use of the display and responsibility for scheduling, maintaining, and
storing the display.
3. Ownership. The City of Minnetonka shall own the display and be responsible for
obtaining property damage insurance covering the value of the display.
4. Use. All members of the Association shall have the opportunity to use the display
without charge, in accordance with reasonable scheduling requirements to be
determined by the Operating Committee of the Association ( "Operating Committee
5. Operations. The Operating Committee shall be responsible for all decisions
regarding the use and operation of the display, including its disposition. The Operating
Committee shall designate which members have the responsibility for scheduling,
maintaining and storing the display.
6. Costs. If a Party incurs costs for performing a responsibility under paragraphs 3 or 5
of this Agreement which are beyond the costs that the Party would otherwise incur, the
Party may submit an invoice to the Association Secretary for reimbursement of those
costs. The costs may be paid out of normal Association dues or the Secretary may
separately invoice each member for an equal share of those costs. Each Association
member shall pay the invoice within 35 days after the invoice date.
7. Disposition. If the Operating Committee votes to dispose of the display, any funds
received shall be placed in the Association's general fund or disbursed equally to all
Association members, as determined by the Operating Committee. The City of
Minnetonka agrees to relinquish ownership of the display if the Operating Committee
votes to dispose of the display.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display, 3 -4 -93
Page 2
8. Indemnification. Each Party agrees to defend and indemnify all other Parties for any
claims resulting from incidents which occurred while the display was in the Party's
possession, subject to the liability limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
Under no circumstances shall a Party be required to pay, on behalf of itself and other
Parties, any amounts in excess of the liability limits for that Party under Chapter 466.
The liability limits for some or all of the Parties may not be added together to increase
the maximum statutory liability for any Party.
9. Waiver of Subrogation. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any
worker's compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer even if the
injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party, its officer,
employees, or volunteers.
10. Termination. Any Party which terminates its membership in the Association shall
automatically be terminated as a Party to this Agreement effective the same date. In
addition, any Party may terminate its participation in this Agreement, without
terminating its membership in the Association, by giving 90 days advance written notice
to the Association Secretary.
11. Change in Ownership. If the City of Minnetonka or a subsequent owner wishes to
divest itself of ownership, it may give 90 days advance written notice to the Association
Secretary that its ownership will cease. The Association Operating Committee may
seek another member to assume ownership. The City of Minnetonka, or a subsequent
owner, may transfer ownership of the display to any other member without approval
from the other Association members or an amendment to this Agreement. Any Party
which assumes ownership shall also assume the rights and obligations of the City of
Minnetonka pursuant to paragraphs 3, 6, and 7. If no other Party wishes to assume
ownership, the Operating Committee shall either dispose of the display or make other
arrangements satisfactory to the Association.
12. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all of the
Parties listed on the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein. Each
Party shall execute a separate signature page and forward that page to the Association
Secretary, along with the following:
• for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or
• for a non - municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to
bind that party which recites the basis of that authority.
Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a copy of the
fully executed agreement to each member.
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display, 3 -493
Page 6
Date: CITY OF EDINA
Its
And
Its
Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Education Display 3 -4-93
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has previously approved
and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the southwest
suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire
personnel.and equipment;
WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have
been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; and
WHEREAS, the participating agencies have determined that it is
advisable to clarify and simplify the language of that agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina , Minnesota, that the revised Southwest
Mutual Aid Association Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of
Fire Personnel and Equipment, a copy of which is attached, is
hereby approved and that the proper City officials are directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the City as a participating
member of the Association.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 7, 1993,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of June, 1993.
Marcella M. Dae n
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a member of the
Southwest Mutual Aid Association;
WHEREAS, the Association has purchased a fire education
display in the form of a small house on a movable trailer ( "the
display ");
WHEREAS, additional insurance is not required if the display
is owned by one of the members rather than by the Association; and
WHEREAS, an agreement providing for the ownership, use,
scheduling, maintenance, and storage of the display is in the best
interests of all Association members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina , Minnesota, that the Southwest Mutual Aid
Association Joint Services Agreement for Use of Fire Education
Display, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved and that
the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLEF&
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 7, 1993,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of June, 1993.
Marcella M. Dae n
City Clerk
e
o N
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
-ii—.G
From:
Ceil Smith
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
June 3, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject
:Approval of Labor
R❑
To Council
Agreement Between the
Action
❑
Motion
City and Local 49 of the
Operating Engineers
El
Resolution
Representing Public Works
and Park Maintenance
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Approve the Labor Contract for 1993 between the City and Local 49.
Info /Background:
The following items were agreed to for the 1993 contract period:
1. Wages - 3% increase.
2. Employer Contribution to Flex Plan (Insurance) - Increase $10.00 Per Month.
3. Overtime - Contract Language Change.
4. Work Schedule - Language Change.
S. Supplemental Uniform Allowance of $100.00.
This agreement is within budget.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
tl //
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item I.. vz . x -
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
% X
Information Only
�I
Date: NNE 7; 1993
Mgr. Recommends
F-1
To HRA
Subject:
C
To Council
CONTRACT - IAFF #1275
Action
Ex
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
C
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize execution of 1993 contract with firefighters.
Info /Background:
Staff and representatives of the International Association of Firefighters Local #1275 have
concluded negotiations concerning the 1993 contract. The proposed contract provides for
a 1993 wage adjustment of 3 percent, a $10.00 per month increase in the City's
contribution toward City provided benefits and a $15 per year increase in the uniform
allowance for each firefighter. In addition, the proposed contract clarifies that firefighters
which are assigned to work on July 4th are eligible for an additional one -half time pay.
The proposed contract also provides an incentive for members of the bargaining unit to
participate in fitness activities during off -duty times. This incentive provides for a
maximum $20.00 per month contribution towards memberships in clubs providing aerobic
activities. Payment is conditioned upon evidence that the participating firefighter
participated in health club. activities at least twice weekly. In consideration of this
incentive, the bargaining unit has agreed to a 50 percent reduction in the educational
incentive program for newly hired employees.
Staff believes that the proposed contract is within the budget guidelines of the Council and
therefore recommends approval of the 1993 contract.
A.
r o;
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor &" City Council
Agenda Item #
VI.I•
From:
Francis Hoffman /
Consent
0
City Engineer j
Information Only
❑
Date:
7 June, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Public Hearing -
El
To Council
Feasibility Report and
Set Hearing Date
Action
0
Motion
Sanitary Sewer
Improvement No. SS -383
❑
Resolution
Post Lane
Ordinance
❑
Recommendation:
Set hearing date of June 21, 1993.
Info /Background:
The following proposed project has been reviewed and is considered feasible:
Location: Post Lane
Improvement: SS -383 Sanitary Sewer
Estimated Cost - $ 18,913.71
Staff would suggest possible hearing date of June 21, 1993. Funding for
SS -383 would be from proposed assessment.
( 'Am AGENDA ITEM VII.A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Bill Bernhjelm, Police Chief
DATE: June 4, 1993
SUBJECT: Letter from Irving Cobb regarding animal complaint
I spoke with Jeff Elasky regarding Mr. Cobb's letter. There apparently is a mis-
communication, as Jeff stated that he would not discuss a Minneapolis ordinance with a
resident in this type of case. He did say that he spoke with Mr. Cobb, the dog owner, and
another neighbor regarding this situation. The dog owner was cooperative and sensitive
to Mr. Cobb's concerns. The dog is currently undergoing obedience training and is being
kept indoors unless attended by the owner. The other neighbor didn't have a problem with
the dog. No other complaints have been received.
The Minneapolis ordinance was checked on by Cell Smith. She said that the only time
permission of neighbors would be needed is in a case where an owner wished to keep more
than two dogs.
At this time there appears to be no basis to proceed under the Dangerous Dog Provisions
of City Code or any other sections of the Code.
WB /nk
,!�
Iz
Li
I,A
Lip,
awl"
J �v
v
.. � / �: "lam. .�- /�'� r j ' ' -• � .. .. .,: '
... : - •.�(.;'S- '.J.::w:sit"::: .- ,- t- e,•zfw� v. •. .. ..:...;,. yn'_ .- '.:.s."rc__':�- ���,c�'__..�. �:.'.r'.�- i±.x',r3G_1°'�
. .. ._c: -+r •: _. i'j'.�.,'�O_ -_'`, •.,•,;,.;� - :rr.sxxd.:s,r.,w;tt -� y.c:'r: •'-= '�`ii4i"�. �°-1- �:,,zs�: r, e'.��..- ::.sS. v' .., �'..., py :- °- 4���°..�"- .- �-- .- .,��.. ---.
->i -{rw - .J,. - n.91Y:.•�.r:. ,L.,.....-K. y "�f- °Y�..i.M_oi ,J _ ,- 4.:.4'•'f�.:"`.�Tn•
IK
Ov
LO
- - - '•'t.' _ _ mod_ _.:.:i;� ° ^ ?... 7 S':!.
`;,;c: J-.- '�:�,=s to �'= -��-�- :s's -':�:.``J _"";%ate z�' -:�: r:+�..:=: •*s :z-r :.'�•+"�;'�''.-- ;.v.'-�:5•:' - ,— .+>r�t:: -: �`=a= t =ra�"� ..a;..
r.- "cr'y'il:.: �.r;_rs. �:'c'_��.s` .�sh'f; r: - y'> �vT`-:...• �:, r�-. i- +,r'..+.::: ^,..- r.:.,.C:C�'_ - ;:�.�'a5.••: e."'� ors -! =_ - {-- :eta:- .- }�_- r - ----- �. - ...'�i�',n:e�: =�:: -*�.:• -
�; :.i.: »sr:;•�:.r^.-wi.. �L"�= jr,�.,�.,,�+,,..V. _ _�.�.,';,`,�`::>�:`: -,. ..i;,; - .."*,!sl., te: -v} �tc�',c..t�� ice,,. _.r�-.;t:�•.:y. _ _ 4
_ `':}. 7F�.F ..^�� _ ''.�� -td.. .�`.'' ._.ai' _ r`t-`',i:''° l'iY�,-•"�. -t.._G._= : -._:: -_r. ��_'_'�I.:;. ra+- �a�Y•.. _..._Jr�rd..�_a
At
4.4
-7
17 cl(
A .4
C-
A.0
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU.
JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page i
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR-
- -
- - -- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
INVOICE
------
PROGRAM
- - - - -- -- - -
- - -- OBJECT
---- -
-P_O. i
--- - - - - --
-----------------------------------
136477
06/07/93
$1,570.00
- - - -- -------
ABC SEAMLESS OF HOPK
NEW GUTTERS /DOWNSPOUT
052093
CDBG PROP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,570.00*
136478
06/07/93
$68.03
ABP MIDWEST
LUNCH MEETING PLANNIN
538754
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
7703
< *>
$68.03*
136479
06/07/93
$476.45
ACTION MAILING SERVI
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
3842
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
< *>
$476.45*
136480
06/07/93
$25.00
ADATH JESHURUN USY
ADERTISING
1993
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
136481
06/07/93
$195.71
ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
ALARM SERVICE
08008102
ED BUILDING &
ALARM SERVICE
06/07/93
$93.03
ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
ALARM SERVICE
08008101
CENTENNIAL LAK
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$288.74*
136482
06/07/93
$88.01
ADVANCE LIGHTING INC
REPAIR
45247
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
7086
< *>
$88.01*
136483
06/07/93
$192.00
ADVANCED STATE SECUR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12108
POOL OPERATION
PROF SERVICES
6487
06/07/93
$1,024.23
ADVANCED STATE SECUR
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
12108
SWIM PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
< *>
$1,216.23*
136484
06/07/93
$190.80
ADVANTAGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
917495
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$190.80*
136485
06/07/93
$10.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
4926305
PW BUILDING
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$30.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
4926305
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
4926305
COMMUNICATIONS
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4926305
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$135.28
AIRSIGNAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
4926305
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
4926305
FINANCE
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$190.28*
136486
06/07/93
$610.09
ALBINSON
SERVICE OZALID
216729
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
5107
< *>
$610.09*
136487
06/07/93
$44.10
ALEXANDER, FIRMIN
CLASS REFUND
051893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
<*>
$44.10*
136488
06/07/93
$137.20
ALPHAGRAPHICS
PRINTING
17091
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
< *>
$137.20*
136489
06/07/93
$615.00
ALSTAD, MARIAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
<*>
S615.00*
136490
06/07/93
$89.60
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
19949
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7422
06/07/93
$200.75
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
TOOLS
009413
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7211
06/07/93
$129.47
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
CROSSOVER BOX FOR TRU
9436
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7211
06/07/93
$172.26
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REBUILT ALT
18377
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7724
< *>
$592.08*
136491
06/07/93
$93.75
AMBERGATE GARDENS
PLANTS
051393
CENTENNIAL LAK
TREES FLWR SH
7520
< *>
$93.75*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 2
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. •
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136492
06/07/93
$140.00
AMERICAN PLANNING AS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
050193
PLANNING
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$140.00*
136493
06/07/93
$208.06
AMERICAN SERVICES CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
000821
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
5208.06*
136494
06/07/93
$144.60
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
051593
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$144.60*
136495
06/07/93
$13.33
AMVETS CONVENTION YE
ADVERTISING
NA16806
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$13.33
AMVETS CONVENTION YE
ADVERTISING
NA16806
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$13.34
AMVETS CONVENTION YE
ADVERTISING
NA16806
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< ■>
$40.00*
136496
06/07/93
$60.00
ANDERSON, CHERI
PERFORM CL
JUNE 5
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$60.00*
136497
06/07/93.
$148.74
ANDERSON, ROSAMOND
AMBULANCE FEES
052593
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$148.74*
136498
06/07/93
$443.39
ANDROC PRODUCTS INC
WEED KILLER
9075
GENERAL TURF C
WEED SPRAY
7389
< *>
$443.39*
136499
06/07/93
$447.30
ANIXTER BROS INC
UNDERGROUND
669 -0691
MAINT OF COURS
SHARED MAINT
7465
< *>
$447.30*
136500
06/07/93
$66.46
ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING
MATERIALS
36495
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7190
< *>
$66.46*
136501
06/07/93
$35.95
ARTISTIC FLORAL
MEMORIAL /J FISCHER
5411
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$35.95*
136502
06;07/93
$86.80
ASCAP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
051193
ED ADMINISTRAT
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$86.80*
136503
06/07/93
.$63.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
60221
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$63.00*
136504
06/07/93
$25.00
ASSOCIATION OF METRO
ANNUAL MEETING
052693
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
<*>
$25.00*
136505
06/07/93
$63.17
ASTLEFORD INTL
KIT
A -97053
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7380
< *>
$63.17*
136506
06/07/93
$12.95
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUC
TELEPHONE
052593
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$14.62
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUC
TELEPHONE
052593
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$27.57*
136507
.ti/07/93
$44.79
AT &T
TELEPHONE
043093
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$17.65
AT &T
TELEPHONE
050393
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$62.44*
136508
06/07/93
$220.00
ATOM
CONT EDUCATION
002722
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$220.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- ----
- - - - -- DESCRIPTION
---------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM - -
- - - - --
- -- OBJECT
----------------
P.O. #
- - - - --
-----------------------------
136509
06/07/93
$139.43
-- - - - --
AUSTIN HARDWARE
HINGE
61567
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7328
< *>
$139.43*
136510
06/07/93
$120.50
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
REPAIR WORK
18866
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
7734
< *>
$120.50*
136511
06/07/93
$701.15
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84020
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
6913
06/07/93
$620.24
AVR INC
CONCRETE
83913
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
6913
06/07/93
$636.03
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84093
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
6913
06/07/93
$848.04
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84794
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
06/07/93
$493.80
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84467
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
< *>
$3,299.26*
136512
06/07/93
$25.55
AXT, LYLE
VENDING PRODUCT
052793
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$25.55*
136513
06/07/93
$129.70
B & S INDUSTRIES INC
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
77917
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
7243
< *>
$129.70*
136514
06/07/93
$254.81
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
PLANTS
52476
PENDING TRANSF
CIP
7348
06/07/93
$415.88
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
SOIL
52822
CENTENNIAL LAK
FERTILIZER
7489
06/07/93
$313.64
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
PLANTS
53219
PENDING TRANSF
CIP
7532
< *>
$984.33*
136515
06/07/93
$126.74
BAILEY NURSERIES
TREES
24891
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
7043
06/07/93
$272.11
BAILEY NURSERIES
PLANT TREES
20147
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
6030
06/07/93
$59.11
BAILEY NURSERIES
TREES
19286
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
6030
< *>
$457.96*
136516
06/07/93
$120.00
BAILEY, CHARLES
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
*
*
136517 -
06/07/93
$65.00
BALDINGER, WENDY
PERFORM CL 6/5/93
051393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$65.00*
136518
06/07/93
$92.92
BANKSYSTEMS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
013343
LIQUOR 50TH ST
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$92.92*
136519
06/07/93
$4,995.00
BARBER CONSTRUCTION
PAVING CART PATH
051493
GC CIP
CIP
7678
< *>
$4,995.00*
136520
06/07/93
$1,042.63
BARR ENG
PROF ENG SERVICES
18734 -18
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,042.63*
136521
06/07/93
$1,500.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATI
SERVICES /MN SPLASH
052493
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,500.00*
136522
06/07/93
26
BATTERY & TIRE WAREH
BRAKE SHOE
253754
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7567
$101..26*
136523
06/07/93
$6,280.81
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
029689
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
6101
< *>
$6,280.81*
136524
06/07/93
$32.47
BECKER ARENA PRODUCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
015271
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7691
06/07/93
$1,110.78
BECKER ARENA PRODUCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
015294
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
7412
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN
3, 1993,
2:49
AN
e
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM -
- -- OBJECT
P.O. i
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$1,143.25*
136525
06/07/93
$170.00
BELL, BRUCE MENIER
CONT SERV CL 6/20
051093
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$170.00*
136526
06/07/93
$18.20
BENN, BRADLEY
'_EY
ART WORK SOLD
POTTERY CONFERENCE
060193
060193
ART CNTR PROG
ART CENTER ADM
SALES OTHER
CONF & SCHOOL
06/07/93
$37.00
BENN, BI'
< *>
$55.20*
136527
06/07/93
$172.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
051593/5
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
CST OF GD LIQ
06/07/93
$262.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
051593/Y
051593/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
06/07/93
$234.50
< *>
$668.50*
136529
06/07/93
$28.38
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
894965
900982
CITY HALL GENE
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
OFFICE SUPPLI
7588
7241
06/07/93
06/07/93
542.97
-$17.89
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CM900982
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
$152.72
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
901448
901537
CITY HALL
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACE
OFFICE SUPPLI
7600
7241
06/07/93
$23.43
$54.53
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CM96165
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
06/07/93
-
$28.93
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
902530
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$88.66
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
902530
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$48.56
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
902557
897806
POOL OPERATION
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPL
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
06/07/93
$138.02
$364.23
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
TONER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
902596
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$50.04
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
903908
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
7606
06/07/93
$5.37
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
904638
904638
POLICE DEPT. G
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
06/07/93
$250.11
$238.68
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
2 STAPLERS
904719
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$3.38
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
904719
904646
POOL OPERATION
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
06/07/93
$36.16
$21.73
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
POOL MANUAL COVERS
906243
POOL ADMIN
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
$108.31
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
906433
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
7778
06/07/93
$28.97
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
907405
907405
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
06/07/93
$9.40
$1.29
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
907405
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$20.74
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
907441
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$1,617.66*
136530
06/07/93
$339.19
BEST BUY CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5012 033
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7492
< *>
$339.19*
136531
06/07/93
$59.69
BEST LOCK
OF MPLS
PARTS
KEYS
39242
39319
CLUB HOUSE
GOLF ADMINISTR
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPL
7917
7707
06/07/93
$9.74
BEST LOCK
OF MPLS
< *>
$69.43*
136532
06/07/93
$271.83
BILL OLSON
BLACK DIRT
052593
GENERAL TURF C
SOD & DIRT
6919
< *>
$271.83*
136533
06/07/97
$194.45
BLEVINS CONCESSION S
PIZZA
4217181-
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GO FOO
6719
< *>
$194.45*
136534
06/07/93
$1,991.55
BORDER STATES INDUST
INDUST
LOCATOR
METROCLAMO /LOCATOR
05053 -56
05113 -59
EQUIPMENT REPL
ST LIGHTING OR
EQUIP REPLACE
REPAIR PARTS
7224
7224
06/07/93
$249.21
BORDER STATES
< *>
$2,240.76*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 5
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136535
06/07/93
$26.76
BOYER TRUCKS
CAP
219641X1
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7405
06/07/93
$112.36
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
221488
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7587
06/07/93
$65.39
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
222962
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7575
06/07/93
$88.09
BOYER TRUCKS
SEAT /BELT
223207
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7727
< *>
$292.60*
136536
06/07/93
$119.93
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
SUPPLIES
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$72.62
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
SUPPLIES
052193
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$80.76
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
$75.25
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
PRINTING
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
06/07/93
$10.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
DUES
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOL
06/07/93
$97.43
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
FOOD FOR RESALE
052193
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
06/07/93
$29.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
POSTAGE
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
POSTAGE
06/07/93
$35.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
LAUNDRY
052193
GRILL
LAUNDRY
06/07/93
-$5.15
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
OVER /UNDER
052193
GOLF PROG
CASH OVER AND
< *>
$514.84*
136537
06/07/93
$144.84
BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLA
SIGN
10246
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
7913
< *>
$144.84*
136538
06/07/93
$310.12
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
282066
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPP
7458
< *>
$310.12*
136539
06/07/93
$285.60
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
61081601
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
7392
< *>
$285.60*
136540
06/07/93
$75.00
BROM, BECKY
SERVICES CL
JUNE 24
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
136541
06/07/93
$239.63
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUC
POWER SUPPLY
10983
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
6288
06/07/93
$6,177.00
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUC
TRAFFIC TESTER
11081
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
EQUIP MAINT
6302
< *>
$6,416.63*
136542
06/07/93
$35.00
BRUMFIELD, ADRIANE
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$35.00*
136543
06/07/93
$360.00
BRYANT, BETSY
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$28.00
BRYANT, BETSY
ART WORK SOLD
060193
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$388.00*
136544
06/07/93
$157.24
BSN SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8423200
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7456
< *>
$157.24*
136545
06/07/93
$75.00
BUDAS, STEVE
PERFORM CL 6/5/93
051393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
,
136546
06/07/93
$57.63
BUIE, BARBARA
MEETING EXPENSE
051493
CENTENNIAL LAK
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$59.70
BUIE, BARBARA
MEETING EXPENSES
052993
CENTENNIAL LAK
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$16.82
BUIE. BARBARA
OFFICE EXPENSES
052993
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/07/93
$3.49
BUIE, BARBARA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
052993
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$137.64*
136547
06/07/93
$65.08
BUILDERS SQUARE
TOOLS
14450858
ED BUILDING &
TOOLS
06/07/93
$34.51
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14450861
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$99.59*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AN
page 0
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM - - -
- -- OBJECT
---------------
P.O. #
- - --
----------------------------------------------------=-------------------------------------------------
136548
06/07/93
$250.00
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA
LICENSES & PERMITS
051793
LIQUOR 50TH ST
LIC & PERMITS
06/07/93
$250.00
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA
LICENSES & PERMITS
051793
LIQUOR YORK GE
LIC & PERMITS
06/07/93
$250.00
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TA
LICENSES & PERMITS
051793
VERNON LIQUOR
LIC & PERMITS
< *�
$750.00"
136549
06/07/93
$169.34
BURGER BROTHERS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES /ANIM
44473
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
7237
< *>
$169.34*
136550
06/07/93
$108.00
BURNS, MARY
REPLACE AC REFUND CHE
051793
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$108.00*
136551
06/07/93
$75.00
BURTIS, ROBERT
SERVICES CL
JUNE 19
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00"
136552
06/07/93
$2,130.00
BUSCH VIDEO PRODUCTI
EDIT VIDEO /MN SPLASH
050193
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,130.00*
136553
06/07/93
$146.14
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
150143
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7668
< *>
$146.14*
136554
06/07/93
$233.24
CADY COMMUNICATIONS
PHONE SYSTEM
81102
GC CIP
CIP
7096
06/07/93
$421.74
CADY COMMUNICATIONS
MAINT CONT
82414
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQU
06/07/93
$253.48
CADY COMMUNICATIONS
PHONE PARTS
82424
GC CIP
CIP
7544
< *>
$908.46*
136555
06/07/93
$161.00
CALLAHAN, FRAN
MAY MILEAGE
060193
PUBLIC HEALTH
MILEAGE
< *>
$161.00*
136556
06/07/93
$60.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE /LOGIS
060193
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$60.00*
136557
06/07/93
$255.23
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
57320
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
7687
06/07/93
$1,915.51
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
57358
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
< *>
$2,170.74*
136558
06/07/93
$54.34
CARLSON STORE FIX CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
65528
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
7344
< *>
$54.34*
136559
06/07/93
$100.00
CARLSON, CRAIG
PERFORM CL
JUNE 20
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
136560
06/07/93
$60.00
CARMICHAEL- RODRIGUEZ
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$60.00*
136561
06/07/93
- $83.34
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
313547
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$8.33
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
315371
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7414
06/07/93
$88.63
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
315556
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7383
06/07/93
$143.13
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
315904
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$156.75*
136562
06/07/93
$79.74
CDP
COPY MACHINE RENTAL
01718029
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$79.74*
136563
06/07/93
$42.25
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052493
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$10.60
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052.493
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 7
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136563
06/07/93
$62.55
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052493
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$34.63
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052493
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$66.73
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
052493.
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$78.29
CELLULAR ONE
CAR PHONE
052493/K
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
06/07/93
$966.61
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR AIRTIME
052493/P
DARE
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$177.39
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052493/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
06/07/93
$170.79
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
052493/P
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$1,609.84*
136564
06/07/93
$355.60
CHEM CONCEPTS
GREASE /CLEANER
0590
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
7453
< *>
$355.60*
136565
06/07/93
$96.07
CHEM -CAL COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
21298 -42
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
7299
< *>
$96.07*
136566
06/07/93
$503.00
CHILD'S PLAY
PROCEEDS FROM /KINETIC
052693
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM I
< *>
$503.00*
136567
06/07/93
$16.15
CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECH
CONT EDUCATION
33488
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$16.15*
136568
06/07/93
$25.52
CITY OF EDINA
WATER & SEWER
050793
CENTENNIAL LAK
SEWER & WATER
06/07/93
$9.35
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
050793.
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
06/07/93
$213.90
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
050793.
FIRE DEPT. GEN
SEWER & WATER
06/07/93
$36.40.
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
050793.
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
06/07/93
$294.17
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
MAY 7
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$579.34*
136569
06/07/93
$30.00
CITY OF EDINA
MEETING EXP
1250
COMMUNICATIONS
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$?O.CO*
136570
06/07/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING
43281
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING
43279
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING
43280
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$40.50*
136571
06/07/93
$487.00
CLASSIC SPORTING ARM
AMMO FOR GUN RANGE
1114
GUN RANGE
AMMUNITION
7509
< *>
$487.00*
136572
06/07/93
$75.00
CLELAND, BRUCE
SERVICES CL 6/12
051393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
136573
06/07/93
$19.14
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
RIBBINS LQ
227710
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$47.89
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
3M DC2120 DATA CART
227710
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$89.40
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
WINDOWS 3.1
227710
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$58.55
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
PAPER & DC TAPES
227710
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$214.98*
136574
06/07/93
$233.18
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUC
MISC SUPP
761886
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
7424
< *>
$233.18*
136575
06/07/93
$30.00
CONNOLLY, BOB
SERVICES CL
JUNE 6
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
136576
06/07/93
$47.84
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
PARTS
18624
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7430
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT-----------
VFNDOR
-- ------ - - - - --
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
INVOICE
--------
PROGRAM - - -
- - - - --
- -- OBJECT---- -
-P_0_ #
-- - - - - --
-----------------------------------------
----------------------
<*>
- - - - --
$47.84*
136577
06/07/93
$94.79
CONSTRUCTION MATERIA
CLEANER /RELEASE AGREE
009725
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
7729
< *>
$94.79*
136578
06/07/93
$885.57
CONVEYORS
BELTING
0018261
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7219
06/07/93
$21.20
CONVEYORS
BELT LACING
0018458
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
7437
< *>
$906.77*
136579
06/07/93
$30.00
COX, LESLIE
REFUBD /SWIMMING
052793
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
136580
06/07/93
$337
12
CREATIVE Pkvi-.fIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
70126
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$337.42*
136581
06/07/93
$213.00
CRITTER CONTROL
BEAVER CONTROL
21308
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
06/07/93
$213 -00
CRITTER CONTROL
BEAVER CONTROL
21312
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
06/07/93
$426.00
CRITTER CONTROL
BEAVER CONTROL
21350
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOV
< *>
$852.00*
136582
06/07/93
$50.00
CROSS VIEW LUTHERAN
REFUND /DEPOSIT
051993
GOLF PROG
RENTAL OF PRO
< *>
$50.00*
136583
06/07/93
$32.00
CSI-
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
20724
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
5761
06/07/93
$40.00
CSI
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
20723
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
5761
06/07/93
$175.00
CSI
EQUIPMENT MAINT
21100
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
7385
< *>
$247.00*
136584
06/07/93
$403.49
CURTIN MATHESON SCIE
LAB SUPPLIES
1429204
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
7450
< *>
$403.49*
136585
06/07/93
$19.40
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
58881
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7521
06/07/93
$67.47
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
FILTER
59011
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7597
< *>
$86.87*
136586
06/07/93
$209.00
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
PUMP TANK /ARNESON
963
BUILDINn MAINT
PROF. SERVICES
7604
< *>
$209.00*
136587
06/07/93
$75.00
DAMAIN, DEXTER
SERVICES CL
JUNE 19
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
(*>
$75.00*
136588
06/07/93
$77.46
DANS REGISTER SERVIC
CASH REGISTER REPAIR/
051993
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *)
$77.46*
136589
06/07/93
$30.36
DARNELL, EILEEN
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
<*>
$30.36*
136590
06/07/93
$300.00
DATAMAP INC
PROF SERVICES
5254
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
7688
< *>
$300.00*
136591
06/07/93
$529.84
DAVIES WATER EQUIPME
GENERAL SUPPLIES
36774
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7628
< *>
$529.84*
136592
06/07/93
$40.00
DAVIS, IDA
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
:k
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136593
06/07/93
$69.75
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
01654
MAINT OF COORS
REPAIR PARTS
7477
06/07/93
$281.18
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
01655
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$129.95
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
01670
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7426
06/07/93
$42.69
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
01683
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7611
06/07/93
$100.84
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
01686
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7629
< *>
$624.41*
136594
06/07/93
$187.44
DE- SIGN ER
SIGN
022449
OFF DUTY EMPLO
GENERAL SUPPL
7222
< *>
$187.44*
136595
06/07/93
$30.90
DEKO FACTORY SERVICE
REPAIR WORK
57249
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7594
<*>
$30.90*
136596
06/07/93
$157.23
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
TOOLS
40402
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
7428
< *>
$157.23*
136597
06/07/93
$3,392.20
DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL PREMIUM
169049
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$3,392.20*
136598
06/07/93
$18.41
DEPENDABLE COURIER
CARF DELIVERY
230332
FINANCE
PRO SVC AUDIT
06/07/93
$8.18
DEPENDABLE COURIER
CAFR DELIVERY
231561
FINANCE
PRO SVC AUDIT
< *>
$26.59*
136599
06/07/93
$874.00
DICKER, TOBIE
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$994.00*
DICKER, TOBIE
PT MAINT ART CENTER
060193
ART CENTER BLD
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
136600
06/07/93
$88.55
DIESEL SERVICE CO
CIRCUIT BREAKER
DS1 -2100
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7305
<*>
$88.55*
136601
06/07/93
$207.00
DIETRICHSON, BILL
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$207.00*
136602
06/07/93
$5.81
DISPATCH COMM /MN
FREQ KNOB
106237
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$283.94
DISPATCH COMM /MN
MAINT CONTRACT
27235
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
< *>
$289.75*
136603
06/07/93
$365.44
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
GOLF PENCILS
1159
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
7708
< *>
5365.44*
136604
06/07/93
$80.00
DORNSEIF, DAN
COMPUTER CLASS
052193
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$80.00*
136605
06/07/93
$3,288.90
DPC INDUSTRIES
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL
00969474
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
6915
06/07/93
$993.67
DPC INDUSTRIES
POOL CHEMICALS
00973767
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
<*>
$4,282.57*
136606
06/07/93
E.J. WINTERS INC
AIR TUBE FOR INDUCTOR
584
SEWER CLEANING
GENERAL SUPPL
7431
$155.49*
136607
06/07/93
$389.91
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
90735
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$149.74
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
90749
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$134.33
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
93275
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$66.80
EAGLE WINE
MIX
94467
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$88.01
EAGLE WINE
MIX
95142
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------------------
<•>
$828.79"
136608
06/07/93
$312.58
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS & POSTS
123281
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
7306
06/07/93
$202.14
EARL F. ANDERSON
PAINT
123498
PAVEMENI MARKI
PAINT
7367
< +>
$514.72"
136609
06/07/93
$162.49
ED KRAEMER & SONS IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33951
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$191.48
ED KRAEMER & SONS IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33950
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$278.43
ED KRAEMER & SONS IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34125
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$279.54
ED KRAEMER & SONS IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34125
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$565.80
ED KRAEMER & SONS IN
FILL MATERIAL
34557
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIAL
<�>
$1,477.74"
136610
06/07/93
$60.75
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF 'GOODS SOLD MI
13208
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$27.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
13256.
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$119.70
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
MISC
15434
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$142.90
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
BEER
15337
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/07/93
$51.25
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
MIX
15338
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$38.70
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
MIX
15429
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$64.20
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
BEER
15325
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/07/93
- $240.00
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
CREDIT
9009401
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
<�>
$264.50"
136611
06/07/93
$137.50
EDINA ART FAIR
CONCESSION AGREEMENT
052593
HUMAN RELATION
EDUCATION PRG
< +>
$137.50•
136612
06/07/93
$25.00
EDINA MODEL YACHT CL
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PER
051993
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< +>
$25.00"
136613
06/07/93
$15.70
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
050593
HUMAN RELATION
EDUCATION PRG
06/07/93
$264.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
REIMBURSEMFtIT /IMMUNIZ
052793
GENERAL FD PRO
CNTY HEALTH A
< +>
$279.70"
136614.06/07/93
$120.00
EHALT, HEIDI
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< ">
$120.00"
136615
06/07/93
$21.80
ELASKY, JEFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051793
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
< +>
$21.80"
136616
06/07/93
$173.99
ELDREDGE, JOY H
AMBULANCE REFUND
051493
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
<">
$173.99"
136617
06/07/93
$146.97
ELVIN SAFETY
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
93191 -06
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
7441
< ">
$146.97"
136618
06/07/93
$42.70
EMPIE, JOHN
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< ">
$42.70"
136619
06/07/93
$110.00
EMPIREHOUSE INC
REPAIRS
51101
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
7517
< +>
$110.00"
136620
06/07/93
$300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB_
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JUNE 199
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
<+>
$300.00"
-
136621
06/07/93
$54.60
ERNIE'S CATERING SER
CONT EDUCATION
1298
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page it
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. i
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$54.60*
136622
06/07/93
$148.34
ETHEL BOYD OR LAVONA
AMBULANCE FEES
051193
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
<*>
$148.34*
136623
06/07/93
$30.00
EVANS, FRANK
SERVICES CL
JUNE 12
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
136624
06/07/93
$37.00
FARBER, DIANE
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$37.00*
136625
06/07/93
$40.19
FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO
ADVERTISING
09478
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
7848
< *>
$40.19*
136626
06/07/93
$887.52
FEED RITE CONTROL
REPAIR VACUUM REGULAT
13685
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$887.52*
136627
06/07/93
$39.91
FERRELLGAS
CRAFT SUPPLIES
22062
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
7671
< *>
$39.91*
136628
06/07/93
$388.00
FETN
VIDEO TRAINING
145230
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
5770
< *>
$388.00*
136629
06/07/93
$245.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI
UTLEY PARK TENNIS COU
93 -00137
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
7360
06/07/93
$998.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI
REPAIRS /HIGHLAND TENN
93 -00135
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
7411
< *>
$1,243.00*
136630
06/07/93
$18.00
FOOTE, JOANNA
MEETING EXPENSES
052093
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
< *>
$18.00*
136631
06/07/93
$1,795.16
FORTIS BENEFITS
HOSPITALIZATION
052893
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *.>
$1,795.16*
136632
06/07/93
$131.00
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
619260
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7681
06/07/93
$170.87
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
627110
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7851
< *>
$301.87*
136633
06/07/93
$230.63
FRAME, SUSAN
COST OF GOODS SOLD
051193
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
06/07/93
$384.00
FRAME, SUSAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$614.63*
136634
06/07/93
$6.39
FRED G ANDERSON INC
PAINT
131276
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7051
< *>
$6.39*
136635
06/07/93
$14.00
FUHRMAN, CHIP
REFUND
053093
GOLF PROG
COMPUTR HANDI
< *>
$14.00*
136636
06/07/93
$82.00
GADEN, MELANIE
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$82.00*
136637
06/07/93
$456.00
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
-
$456.00*
136638
06/07/93
$38.00
GEM TAP SERVICE
BEER LINES
043093
GRILL
CST OF GO F00
< *>
838.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 12
CHECK4
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
-------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
- - - - --
-- OBJECT
------------------
P.O.
---------------------------------------------------
136639.06/07/93
$228.98
GENERAL OFFICE PRODU
OFFICE CHAIRS
338850
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
7706
< *>
5228.98*
136640
06/07/93
$240.00
GILLIS. LOUISE
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
5240.00*
136641
06/07/93
$13.17
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
REPLACEMENT KEYS
931050
GOLF CARS
GENERAL SUPPL
7525
< *>
$13.17*
136642
06/07/93
$4,218.25
GOLFCRAFT
PURCHASES FOR PRO SHO
060193
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOL
< *>
$4,218.25*
136643
06/07/93
$542.25
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
3040221
SUPERV. & OVRH
GOPHER STATE
< *>
$542.25*
136644
06/07/93
$95.00
GOVERNMENT FINANCE 0
GFOA ANNUAL DUES
0356553
FINANCE
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$95.00*
136645
06/07/93
$192.00
GRAPP, JEAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$192.00*
136646
06/07/93
$73.91
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
104 -6694
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
7369
06/07/93
$67.52
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
500 -5748
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
7420
< *>
$141.43*
136647
06/07/93
$78.55
GREER, PAT
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER.
< *>
$78.55*
136648
06/07/93
$265.00
GRENDAHL MECHANICAL
GRILL CONNECTION
1323
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
7914
< *>
$265.00*
136649
06/07/93
$1,740.00
GREUPNER, JOE
GOLF LESSONS
060193
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOL
< *>
$1,740.00*
136650
06/07/93
$27.95
GRIDLEY, CATHY
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$27.95*
136651
06/07/93
$22.27
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
MLX
95661
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$22.27*
136652
06/07/93
$104.97
GS DIRECT
CREDIT MEMO TAKEN TWI
052593
ENGINEERING OE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$104.97*
136653
06/07/93
$25.00
GUST, MARGARET
VISUAL ARTS CL 6/10
AC INSTRUCTOR
050693,
060193
ED ADMINISTRAT
ART CENTER ADM
PRO SVC OTHER
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
06/07/93
$394.00
$103.00
GUST, MARGARET
GUST, MARGARET
CRAFT SUPPLIES
060193
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
< *>
$522.00*
136654
06/07/93
$237.23
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
154793
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
7480
< *>
$237.23*
136655
06/07/93
$60.00
HANLON, NORMA
AC INSTRUCTOR
CRAFT SUPPLIES
060193
060193
ART CENTER ADM
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
CRAFT SUPPLIE
06/07/93
06/07/93
$12.00
$57.16
HANLON, NORMA
HANLON, NORMA
ART WORK,SOLD
060193
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$129.16*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
%S
page 13
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136656
06/07/93
$74.75
HANNA, JUNE
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
<•>
$74.75*
136657
06/07/93
$255.00
HANS ROSACKER CO
PLANTS
7590
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SH
7781
< *>
$255.00*
136658
06/07/93
$30.00
HAPPY FACES
VISUAL ARTS 6/12 CL
050693
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
136659
06/07/93
$30.00
HAPPY FACES
VISUAL ART 6/19 CL
MAY 6
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
136660
06/07/93
$85.41
HAROLD CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
624441
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7560
< *>
$85.41*
136661
06/07/93
$180.00
HEIM, HARRY
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$180.00*
136662
06/07/93
$690.51
HEIMARK FOODS
MEAT
051393
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
c *>
$690.51*
136663
06/07/93
$231.71
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINT
APRIL 19
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
06/07/93
$41.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
EQUIPMENT MAINT
MAY 1993
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$272.71*
136664
06/07/93
$166.74
HIAWATHA REDDY RENTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
01 -06739
WATER TREATMEN
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$166.74*
136665
06/07/93
$399.38
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M
LINE MARKING PAINT
26431
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POW
6443
< *>
$399.38*
136666
06/07/93
$16.72
HOFFMAN, FRANCIS
REIMBURSEMENT /RETIREM
052093
LIQUOR YORK GE
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$16.72*
136667
06/07/93
.$400.00
HOMER ENGDAHL TRUST
AMBULANCE FEES
051993
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$400.00*
136668
06/07/93
$63.85
HOPKINS CAR CARE CEN
INTERIOR CAR SHAMPOO
051393
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
7581
< *>
$63.85*
136669
06/07/93
$1,139.83
HORIZON CHEMICAL CO
PRINTING
15350
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
7473
< *>
$1,139.83*
136670
06/07/93
$891.00
HORWATH, TOM
FORESTRY
051893
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$16.50
HORWATH, TOM
TREE TRIMMING
060193
TREE TRIMMING
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$924.00
HORWATH, TOM
CONTRACT FORESTRY
060193
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$101.36
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE
060193
TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$1,932.86*
136671
06/07/93
$29.04
HOUSER, BEVERLY
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$29.04*
136672
06/07/93
$.HOWARD,
DARCY
REFUND TENNIS
051493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
*
$2500*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE - -
- -- PROGRAM-- - - -
- -- OBJECT
---------------
P.O. #
- --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136673
06/07/93
$60.00
HWY 101 AUTO SALVAGE
REPAIR PARTS
1488
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7365
< *>
560.00*
136674
06/07/93
$232.80
HYDRAULIC SERVICE
ENGINE HYD REBUILT
34443
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
7710
<*>
$232.80*
136675
06/07/93
$828.14
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5799
0005834
UTILITY PROG
METER REPAIR
INVENTORY WAT
GENERAL SUPPL
5382
5382
06/07/93
5296.60
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
< *>
$1,124.74*
136676
06/07/93
$29.72
INDELCO PLASTIC CORP
MISC POOL SUPPLIES
90436
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7371
< *>
$29.72*
136677
06/07/93
$81.45
INTERIOR COMMUNICATI
PHONE
3762
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
7793
<* >.
$81.45*
136678
06/07/93
$175.00
INTERNATIONAL CONFER
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
051493
INSPECTIONS
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$175.00*
136679
06/07/93
$2.96
INTERSTATE DETROIT D
ACCESSORIES
198387
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7399
< *>
$2.96*
136680
06/07/93
$425.00
JAMES CONSTRUCTION C
CABINET
052593
GC CIP
CIP
7715
< *>
$425.00*
136681
06/07/93
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
REPLACE CHECK FROM MA
1993 MAY
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
136682
06/07/93
$1.,100.80
JAMIESON AND ASSOCIA
EVALUATION /SOUND SYST
93542
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
<*>.
$1 , 100.8"
136683
06/07/93
$490.61
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
D2010
D2108
ART CENTER ADM
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
PRINTING
7261
7263
06/07/93
06/07/93
$496.64
$149.63
JERRYS PRINTING
JERRYS PRINTING
POOL MANUAL
D2362
POOL ADMIN
PRINTING
< *>
$1,136.88*
136684
06/07/93
$252.00
JEUB, PATTI
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$252.00*
136685
06/07/93
$217.34
JIM HATCH SALES
HATCH SALES
TOOLS
SAFETY VESTS
2475
2493
GENERAL MAINT
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
SAFETY EQUIPM
7397
6804
06/07/93
$472.80
JIM
< *>
$690.14*
136686
06/07/93
$7.50
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
410696
410605
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
06/07/93
$78.06
$57.58
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
439711
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$46.02
JOHNSON WINE CO.
MISC
MIX
467902
466862
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
06/07/93
$30.02
$39.54
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
MISC
467829
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$258.72*
136687
06/07/93
$50.00
JOHNSON NAOMI
,
CLASS REFUND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
060193
ART CNTR PROG
ART CENTER BLD
REGISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
06/07/93
$31.87
$92.34
JOHNSON, NAOMI
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
060193
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
< *>
$174.21*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 15
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136688
06/07/93
$76.09
JR JOHNSON SUPPLY
FERILIZER
105990
ED BUILDING &
FERTILIZER
7557
k
136689
06/07/93
$13.44
JULIEN, DIANE
REIMBURSE 12 TRIPS TO
052493
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$13.44*
136690
06/07/93
$18.50
JULIEN, DIANE
PLATES
052593
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
06/07/93
$7.44
JULIEN, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
052593
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$20.04
JULIEN, DIANE
SAFETY GLASSES
052593
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
< *>
$45.98*
136691
06/07/93
$69.25
JUSTUS LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
3488
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7065
< *>
$69.25*
136.692
06/07/93
$4,145.51
KARSTEN MANUFACTURIN
CLUBS /EQUIPMENT /PRO S
060193
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOL
< *>
$4,145.51*
136693
06/07/93
$42.50
KEHOE, TERRENCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
052593
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$42.50*
136695
06/07/93
$70.90
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PANEL MOLD /LUMBER
053787
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7185
06/07/93
$6.88
KNOX COMM CREDIT
SHELF CLIP
053872
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7196
06/07/93
$27.13
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
054207
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7212
06/07/93
$70.02
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
054898
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7459
06/07/93
$80.35
KNOX.COMM CREDIT
SUPPLIES
055620
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
7468
06/07/93
$36.17
KNOX COMM CREDIT
MISC BLDG MATERIALS
055829
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7429
06/07/93
$7.01
KNOX COMM CREDIT
SUPPLIES
055936
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
7468
06/07/93
$48.97
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER /SHED AT BRAEMA
056186
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
7571
06/07/93
$160.74
KNOX COMM CREDIT
BUILDING SUPPLIES
056286
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7578
06/07/93
$23.55
KNOX COMM CREDIT
SUPPLIES
056265
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
7543
06/07/93
$226.14
KNOX COMM CREDIT
MISC HARDWARE
056825
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7634
06/07/93
$55.00
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
035949
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
7665
06/07/93
$71.09
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
057044
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
7646
06/07/93
$168.26
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
057205
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
7654
06/07/93
$135.20
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
057386
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7618
06/07/93
$56.96
KNOX COMM CREDIT
SUPPLIES
057507
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
7774
< *>
$1,254.37*
136696
06/07/93
$310.00
KNUTSON, KAREN
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$310.00*
136697
06/07/93
$78.00
KOCHENASH, RICK
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
( *>
$78.00*
136698
06/07/93
$398.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
72458
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
7777
< *>
$398.00*
136699
06/07/93
$30.00
KRENTZ, PAT
REFUND /SWIMMING LESSO
052193
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
136700
06/07/93
$2,577.49
KUNDE CO INC
OAK WILT CONTROL
051093
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$2.577.49*
136701
06/07/93
$30.00
KVASNICK, BARB
VISUAL ART 6/19 CL
050693
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
'< *>
$30.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU. JUN
3, 1993, 2:49
AN
page 16
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM-- - - -
- -- OBJECT
---------------
P.O.
- --
--------------------------------------------------
136702
06/07/93
$230.00
LAKE RESTORATION
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
728
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
7597
06/07/93
$193.00
LAKE RESTORATION
INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2824
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
7582
06/07/93
$435.00
LAKE RESTORATION
INC
LAKE WEED TREATMENT
4158
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
7877
< *>
$858.00*
136703
06/07/93
$59.36
LANCRETE, LAURA
MILEAGE
052793
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
< *>
$59.36*
136704
06/07/93
$500.00
LANCRETE, LAURA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051793
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$500.00*
136705
06/07/93
$425.89
LASER QUIPT
EXTRA TONER CARTRIDGE
052493
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQU
<*>
$425.89*
136707
06/07/93
$443.89
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1939061
1939060
CENTENNIAL LAK
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
7106
7335
06/07/93
06/07/93
$431.07
$152.74
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1942783
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
'
7191
06/07/93
$325.97
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
1942780
1942779
EQUIPMENT OPER
ED BUILDING &
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
7193
7192
06/07/93
06/07/93
$96.54
$485.63
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1942782
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7191
06/07/93
$438.13
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ROTARY FILE SET
REPAIR PARTS
1942781
1946025
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
REPAIR PARTS
7197
7210
06/07/93
06/07/93
$475.42
$142.40
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1947454
PARKING LOTS
GENERAL SUPPL
7322
06/07/93
$138.19
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1947456
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7330
06/07/93
$468.99
$222.92
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TAPS & DIES
TERMINALS /SCREWS /SUPP
1947544
1954588
EQUIPMENT OPER
STREET NAME SI
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPL
7324
7564
06/07/93
-06/07/93
$358.66
LAWSON PRODUCTS
SCREWS -TY RAPS
1954587
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
7563
06/07/93
$83.75
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ELECTRICAL
WING & PLASTIC NUTS
1954586
1954585
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPL
7465
7465
06/07/93
06/07/93
$421.03
$260.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS
L!.': /SON PRODUCTS
TY NET RAPS
1954584
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7444
<•>
$4,946.18*
136708
06/07/93
$537.00
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18549
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
7391
< *>
$537.00*
136709
06/07/93
$25.00
LEMEL, BETSY
REFUND TENNIS
051493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
( *>
$25.00*
136710
06/07/93
$6.92
LIEN INFECTION CON
CLEAN SUPPLIES
001768
GOLF DOME
CLEANING SUPP
7713
( *>
$6.92*
136711
06/07/93
$180.00
LINDENSELSER LANDFIL
RUBBISH REMOVAL
043093
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOV
7301
< *>
.$180.00*
136712
06/07/93
$20.79
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
226823
COMMUNICATIONS
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/07/93
$7.19
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
227104
PLANNING
PHOTO SUPPLIE
( *)
$27.98*
136713
06/07/93
$6,123.12
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
DATA PROCESSING
AR0493
AR0493
FINANCE
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSI
DATA PROCESSI
-
06/07/93
06/07/93
$3,048.58
$1,605.49
LOGIS
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0493
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSI
06/07/93
$294.15
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0493
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSI
06/07/93
$458.51
LOGIS.
DATA PROCESSING
AR0493
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSI
06/07/93
$294.14
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0493
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$11,823:99*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 17
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. •
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136714
06/07/93
$1,063.14
LUND, RON
AUCTIONEERS FEE
052493
GENERAL FD PRO
SALE OF PROPE
• < *>
$1,063.14*
136715
06/07/93
$182.06
LUTZ, RICHARD M
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /RE
051193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$182.06*
136716
06/07/93
$202.08
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
20374
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$281.76
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
20361
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$397.17
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
20398
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$443.68
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20476
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$182.32
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20546
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$438.71
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20572
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$322.88
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20748
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$233.92
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20735
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$403.84
M AMUNDSON
MIX
20765
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$2,906.36*
136717
06/07/93
$15.00
M.G.I.A.
DUES
052193
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$15.00*
136718
06/07/93
$103.09
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
WATER TANK GAUGE
33768
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7027
06/07/93
$66.81
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC:
REPAIR PARTS
33976
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7586
06/07/93
$39.70
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
CABLE
34313
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7423
< *>
$209.60*
136719
06/07/93
$225.00
MACKERMAN, DANNY
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$225.00*
136720
06/07/93
$47.00
MAKELA, BARB
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$47.00*
136721
06/07/93
$36.00
MCCABE, SHIRE
CLASS REFUND
051893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$36.00*
136722
06/07/93
$992.89
MCCAREN DESIGN
PLANTS
8892
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SH
7178
06/07/93
$992.88
MCCAREN DESIGN
PLANTS
9024
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SH
7698
06/07/93
$112.80
MCCAREN DESIGN
SOIL
9036
ED BUILDING &
FERTILIZER
7619
< *>
$2,098.57*
136723
06/07/93
$120.40
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
MILEAGE
052793
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$124.32
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
MILEAGE
060193
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
< *>
$244.72*
136724
06/07/93
$327.50
MCDOWELL, MARGARET
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$327.50*
136725
06/07/93
$50.00
MCELROY, KIMBERLY
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH
051893
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$50.00*
136726
06/07/93
.$198.88
MCGARVEY COFFEE
COFFEE
1594001
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
5572
< *>
$198.88*
136727
06/07/93
$7.93
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
050193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
06/07/93
$293.29
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
050193/P
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
06/07/93
$436.20
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS.
050193/P
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 18
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136727
06/07/93
$986.10
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
ACCESSOPIES
050193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
06/07/93
$58.52
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
050193/P
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$3,027.59
MCGUIRE.AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
050193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$4,809.63*
136728
06/07/93
$154.04
MCNEILUS STEEL
ALUMINUM
0105068
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7403
< *>
$154.04*
136729
06/07/93
$23,530.15
MED CENTER HEALTH PL
HOSPITALIZATION PREM
1067831
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$23,530.15*
136730
06/07/93
$29,276.16
MEDIC" ''HOICE
HOSP PREMIUM
19314510
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$29,276.16*
136731
06/07/93
$313.85
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33062
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7325
06/07/93
$265.71
MERIT SUPPLY
LPS'
33069
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
7416
06/07/93
$488.65
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33088
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPL
7374
06/07/93
$260.28
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
33151
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPP
7535
06/07/93
$268.80
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33153
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
7526
06/07/93
$260.92
MERIT SUPPLY
DISPENSER /SPA BATH
33171
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
7561
06/07/93
$498.24
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
33216
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7635
06/07/93
$112.89
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
33217
ART CENTER BLD
CLEANING SUPP
7269
06/07/93
$249.21
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
33266
GRILL -
CLEANING SUPP
1:92
06/07/93
$460.46
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33267
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7189
06/07/93
$388.46
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33273
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7840
< *>
$3,567.47*
136732
06/07/93
$15.00
METHODIST HOSPITAL
PROF SERVICES
241571
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$15.00*
136733
06/07/93
$290.00
METRO AREA PROMOTION
ADVERTISING /BUSDIR
3063
LIQUOR 50TH ST
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$300.00
METRO AREA PROMOTION
ADVERTISING /BUSDIR
3063
LIQUOR YORK GE
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$300.00
METRO.AREA PROMOTION
ADVERTISING /BUSDIR
3063
VERNON LIQUOR
ADVERT OTHER
<*>
$890.00*
136734
06/07/93
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
ABSTRACT TRACT SEARCH
367391
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
7558
06/07/93
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
ABSTRACT TRACT SEARCH
369275
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
7853
< *>
$70.00*
136735
06/07/93
$225,940.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE METRO
50500693
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC MET
< *>
$225,940.00*
136736
06/07/93
$28.16
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
051593
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
06/07/93
$9.52
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
052293
GRILL
CST OF OD F00
06/07/93
$28.16
METZ BAKING CO
HOT DOG BUNS
052293/P
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GO FOO
<*>
$65.84*
136737
06/07/93
$80.00
MGCSA
ASSN DUES
JUNE
MAINT OF COURS
DUES & SUBSCR
06/07/93
$80.00
MGCSA
DUES
JUNE
MAINT OF COURS
DUES & SUBSCR
06/07/93
$200.00
MGCSA
SCHOOL
060193
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOL
7918
< *>
$360.00*
136738
06/07/93
$81.94
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
PAINT
1080
DISTRIBUTION
PAINT
06/07/93
$63.50
MIDWEST - ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1067
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$57.86
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1049
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 19
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O.
---------------------------------------------
- - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136738
06/07/93
$213.27
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
9107
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
06/07/93
$1,260.36
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
9107
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
06/07/93
$378.18
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1109.
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$2,055.11*
136739
06/07/93
$575.00
MIDWEST AUDITING SER
PRO SERVICES
041493
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$575.00*
136740
06/07/93
$43.58
MIDWEST MACHINERY IN
REPAIR PARTS
18279
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7373
< *>
$43.58*
136741
06/07/93
$91.53
MIDWEST SPORTS MKTG
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110151
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7676
< *>
$91.53*
136742
06/07/93
$134.00
MIDWEST VENDING WHOL
FOOD
052793
GRILL
CST OF GO F00
< *>
$134.00*
136743
06/07/93
$440.00
MILLERBERND
•REPAIR PARTS
54146
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
6832
< *>
$440.00*
136744
06/07/93
$374.97
MILLIPORE
LAB SUPPLIES
747252
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
7451
< *>
$374.97*
136745
06/07/93
$105.86
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC T
SHANK BIT
25 -49 -24
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7194
< *>
$105.86*
136746
06/07/93
$226.20
MINE SAFETY APPLIANC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
05/20319
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7617
< *>
$226.20*
136747
06/07/93
512.24
MINN COMM PAGING
PAGER CENTRAL
050193
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$12.24*
136748
06/07/93
$748.50
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030007
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
7527
06/07/93
$280.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB
REPAIR STOP BOX
030018
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
7742
< *>
51,028.50*
136750
06/07/93
$294.96
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
06/07/93
$260.02
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
06/07/93
$1,803.68
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
PW BUILDING
HEAT
06/07/93
$671.83
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
06/07/93
$98.84
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
06/07/93
$6.56
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
POOL OPERATION
HEAT
06/07/93
$152.21
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
06/07/93
$46.11
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
06/07/93
$62.14
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
GOLF DOME
HEAT
06/07/93
$1,520.98
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
06/07/93
$217.08
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
ED BUILDING &
HEAT
06/07/93
$300.23
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
06/07/93
$2,298.42
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
06/07/93
$9.54
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
06/07/93
$17.70
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
06/07/93
$56.49
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
06/07/93
$118.44
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
JUNE 7,
CENTENNIAL LAK
HEAT
< *>
$7,935.23*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 20
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. i
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136751
06/07/93
$37.41
MINNESOTA CERAMIC SU
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
145959
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
6874
< *>
$37.41*
136752
06/07/93
$28.84
MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00073
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
<*>
$28.84*
136753
06/07/93
$100.00
MINNESOTA CRAFTS COU
AC ADVERTISING
060193
ART CENTER ADM
AD" "'T OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
136754
06/07/93
$161.67
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
MMBA DUES
MAY 1993
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$161.67
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
MMBA DUES
MAY 1993
LIQUOR YORK GE
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$161.66
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
MMBA DUES
MAY 1993
VERNON LIQUOR
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$485.00*
136755
06/07/93
$232.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
SALE OF PROPERTY
051093
GENERAL FD PRO
SALE OF PROPE
06/07/93
$59.76
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
ORD 1993 -8
9001
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$291.76*
136756
06/07/93
$335.48
MINNESOTA TRUCKING A
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
004733
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOL
7404
< *>
5335.48*
136757
06/07/93
$405.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS
PRINTING
23749
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
6018
< *>
$405.00*
136758
06/07/93
$90.00
MITCHELL, RAY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051793
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$90.00*
136759
06/07/93
$120.00
MN CHIEFS OF POLICE
DUES
052193
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$120.00*
136760
06/07/93
$47.48
MN DEPT REVENUE
PENALTY
022893
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$47.48*
136761
06/07/93
$77.94
MN. BEARING CO.
CHEM KIT
115284
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
7580
< *>
$77.94*
136762
06/07/93
$65.00
MN. ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR SERVICE
050367
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$65.00*
136763
06/07/93
$197.62
MN. GLOVE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
79024
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
7425
06/07/93
$42.30
MN. GLOVE
RAIN JACKET /PVC
79977
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
7425
< *>
$239.92*
136764
06/07/93
$4.90
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
328921
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7357
06/07/93
$461.42
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
330187
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7357
06/07/93
$70.58
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
330173
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
.7507
06/07/93
$66.08
MN. TORO INC.
BALL JOINTS
331385
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7446
06/07/93
$22.24
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
331957
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
7559
06/07/93
$103.20
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
332354
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7608
06/07/93
$55.69
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
332370
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
7614
< *>
$784.11*
136765
06/07/93
$425.15
MN. WANNER
GEAR /DRILL
18004
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
400.77
MN. WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
18109
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
7630
< *>
$485.92*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
THU,
JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 21
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. !
--------------------------------------------------
ii - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
136766
06/07/93
$55.00
MOBILE CELLULAR UNL.
EQUIPMENT MAINT
178675
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
06/07/93
$120.00
MOBILE CELLULAR UNL.
EQUIPMENT MAINT
178965
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
7569
< *>
S175.00*
136767
06/07/93
$5.62
MODEL STONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2038797
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
2235
< *>
$5.62*
136768
06/07/93
$9,294.08
MPLS FINANCE DEPARTM
WATER PURCHASED
051593
DISTRIBUTION
WATER PURCHAS
< *>
$9,294.08*
136769
06/07/93
$111.20
MPLS HEALTH DEPT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1274
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$111.20*
136770
06/07/93
$95.47
MTS NW SOUND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
114272
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7351
< *>
$95.47*
136771
06/07/93
$23.96
MUNICILITE CO
REPAIR PARTS
4644
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7393
06/07/93
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO
REPAIR WORK
4687
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7642
06/07/93
$479.36
MUNICILITE CO
EMERGENCY LIGHTING
4697
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7723
< *>
$556.82*
136772
06/07/93
$100.00
MUSICAL IMAGININGS
SERVICES CL 6/7
051093
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
136773
06/07/93
$55.00
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACT
060193/C
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
06/07/93
$43.00
MUZAK
MUSIC ADVERTISING
060193/L
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$43.00
MUZAK
MUSIC ADVERTISING
060193/L
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$141.00*
136774
06/07/93
$30.00
N.T.O.A.
DUES
051993
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$30.00*
136775
06/07/93
$418.80
NAME BRAND SPORTS
EP UNIFORMS
6249
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
7690
06/07/93
$350.10
NAME BRAND SPORTS
UNIFORMS CL
6248
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
7689
< *>
$768.90*
136776
06/07/93
$19.14
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
894823
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7590
06/07/93
$25.52
NAPA AUTO PARTS
OUT BOX
895746
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7728
06/07/93
$38.28
NAPA AUTO PARTS
OUT BOX
895581
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7591
< *>
$82.94*
136777
06/07/93
$421.01
NASCO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
248509
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
7449
< *>
$421.01*
136778
06/07/93
$20.62
NATIONAL CUSTOM ENTE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25304
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7375
< *>
$20.62*
136779
06/07/93
$94.56
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
CONCESSION PRODUCT
172328
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF OD F00
6718
06/07/93
$53.98
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
172416
VANVALKENBURG
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$62.29
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
172360
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
06/07/93
$226.95
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
CONCESSION PRODUCT
174358
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD FOO
06/07/93
$121.08
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD
174363
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
7928
< *>
$558.86*
136780
06/07/93
$294.21
NEDOROSKI, DAN
CARPET CLEANING
6033
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 22
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. •
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$294.21*
136781
06/07/93
$180.00
NELSON, J THOMAS
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
06/07/93
$19.50
NELSON, J THOMAS
ART -WORK SOLD
060193
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
<*>
$199.50*
136782
06/07/93
$191.06
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGNS & POSTS
2003551
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
7316
< *>
$191.06*
136783
06/07/93
$225.00
NICHOLAS LEGEROS
INC
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$225.00*
136784
06/07/93
$301.75
NORTH SECOND STREET
PIPE
048362
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7645
<*>
$301.75*
136785
06/07/93
$498:42
NORTH STAR TURF
GRASS SEED
545660
FIELD MAINTENA
SEED
7398
< *>
$498.42*
136786
06/07/93
$102.22
NORTHERN AIRE
TEST TABS
6600
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
7733
< *>
$102.22*
136787
06/07/93
$43.79
NORTHERN AIRGAS
4 NITROUS OXIDE
19396
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
5500
<*>
$43.79*
-
136788
06/07/93
$70.23
NORTHERN
REPAIR PARTS
620881B1
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7682
< *>
$70.23*
136789
06/07/93
$181.71
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SU
COST OF GOODS SOLD
206777
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7266
06/07/93
$24.48
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SU
COST OF GOODS SOLD
207150
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7667
06/07/93
$99.03
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SU
COST OF GOODS SOLD
207142
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7270
06/07/93
$143.40
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SU
COST OF GOODS SOLD
207385
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7672
< *>
$448.62*
136790
06/07/93
$202.84
NORTHWESTERN SERVICE
REPAIRS'
31538
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
7776
< *>
$202.84*
136792
06/07/93
$123.50
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
NW -119
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
06/07/93
$92.66
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -118
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$81.49
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -130
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$111.07
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -134
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$93.46
NORTHWESTERN TIRE.CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
NW -149
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$287.96
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
NW -284
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
06/07/93
$87.33
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -301
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$83.78
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
REPAIR PARTS
NW -317
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$213.00
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
NW -304
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$166.89
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -482
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$98.47
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -501
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$182.22
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -525
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$222.93
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -617
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$783.46
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
NW -618
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7177
06/07/93
$364.44
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
NW -720
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
06/07/93
$77.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -723
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
06/07/93
$212.79.
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -722
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
<*>
$3,282.77*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 23
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136793
06/07/93
$31.00
NOSEK, ANN
REPLACE
AC REFUND
CHE 051793
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$31.00*
136794
06/07/93
$462.58
NOVAK'S GARAGE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
4435
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPL
7605
06/07/93
$409.85
NOVAK'S GARAGE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
4436
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPL
6794
< *>
$872.43*
136796
06/07/93
$7.40
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
051293
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$648.65
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
051293
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$69.35
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
051293
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$269.85
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
052693
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$24.19
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
GENERAL MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$22,198.50
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$3,133.23
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$3,059.53
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$236.03
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$1.29
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$2,804.45
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$1,486.32
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07'/93
$28.43
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$1,615.16
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$2,294.61
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
PW BUILDING
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$4,372.92
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$2,876.02
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$264.32
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$161.53
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$5,541.37
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$1,681.01
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$20,076..15
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$7 09.59
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$1,183.72
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$524.97
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$578.54
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
GOLF DOME
LIGHT
&
POWER
06/07/93
$727.64
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
JUNE 7,
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT
&
POWER
< *>
$76,574.77*
136797
06/07/93
$384.00
ODLAND, DOROTHY
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF
SERVICES
< *>
$384.00*
136798
06/07/93
$85.19
OFFICE MAX INC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
051393
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL
SUPPL
< *>
$85.19*
136799
06/07/93
$352.52
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
31807
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
7272
< *>
$352.52*
136800
06/07/93
$25.77
OLLMAN, DOROTHY
ART WORK
SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES
OTHER
< *>
$25.77*
136801
06/07/93
$39.90
OLWIN, ROGER
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
052893
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPL
<*>
$39.90*
136802
06/07/93
$134.50
OPM INFORMATION SYST
2MB MEMORY
VPT
198071
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL
SUPPL
7607
< *>
$134.50*
136803
06/07/93
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
4H79 ? ? ??
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF
GD F00
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 24
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. t
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136803
06/07/93
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
254942
GRILL
CST OF GO F00
06/07/93
5171.50
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
255156
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GO F00
06/07/93
$37.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
4H8690
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$362.50*
136804
06/07/93
$1,215.40
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE CONTRACT
73930
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQU
<*>
$1,215.40*
136805
06/07/93
$59.50
PANCAKE, CHAR
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$59.50*
136806
06/07/93
$89.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
051593
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$89.00*
136807
06/07/93
51,666.00
PARSONS ELECTRIC COM
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
123312B
PARKS
CIP
7697
06/07/93
$3,360.00
PARSONS ELECTRIC COM
ALARM REVISIONS SR CT
123312A
PARKS
CIP
5993
< *>
$5,026.00*
136808
06/07/93
$20.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
31542
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/07/93
$46.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
BEER
31997.
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$66.00*
136809
06/07/93
$30.00
PELINKA, DICK
LICENSE RENEWAL /CLASS
052793
TRAINING
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$30.00*
136810
06/07/93
$290.75
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
APRIL /VE
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$290.75*
136811
06/07/93
$2,000.00
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CO
CREEK VALLEY SOCCER F
052493
GC CIP
CIP
4232
< *>
$2,000.00*
136812
06/07/93
$20.00
PETERSON, DAVID
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH
052793
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$20.00*
136813
06/07/93
$25.74
PETT, BARBARA
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$25.74*
136815
06/07/93
$68.94
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /ADM
060193
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$20.00
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /FINANCE
060193
FINANCE
DUES & SUBSCR
06/07/93
$2.75
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /FINANCE
060193
FINANCE
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$9.76
PETTY CASH
MILEAGE /FINANCE
060193
FINANCE
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$40.87
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /ASSESSING
060193
ASSESSING
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$28.00
PETTY CASH
PARKING /ASSESSING
060193
ASSESSING
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$9.54
PETTY CASH
PHOTO PROCESSING /ASSE
060193
ASSESSING
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$1.00
PETTY CASH
PARKING /ENGINEERING
060193
ENGINEERING GE
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$20.99
PETTY CASH
PHOTO SUPPLIES /HEALTH
060193
PUBLIC HEALTH
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/07/93
$3.82
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES /BUILDING
060193
INSPECTIONS
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/07/93
$3.75
PETTY CASH
CONT ED /COMMUNICATION
060193
COMMUNICATIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
06/07/93
$24.17
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /COMMUNICATION
060193
COMMUNICATIONS
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$24.99
PETTY CASH
MTG EXP /COMMUNICATION
060193
COMMUNICATIONS
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$0.23
PETTY CASH
POSTAGE /FINANCE
060193
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
.06/07/93
$4.88
PFTTY CASH
KITCHEN SUPPLIES /MAIN
060193
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
06/07/93
$2.50
Pt'TY CASH
PARKING /PARK & REC
060193
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$9.71
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES /ADAPTIVE REC
060193
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$8.19
PETTY CASH
FILM DEV /ADAPTIVE REC
060193
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PHOTO SUPPLIE
COUNCIL.CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 25
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136815
06/07/93
$18.90
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES /PARK & REC
060193
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$18.46
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES /GUN RANGE
060193
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
06/07/93
$14.89
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES /WATER DEPART
060193
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$336.34*
136816
06/07/93
$24.53
PFEIFFER, POLLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
052593
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$24.53*
136817
06/07/93
$411.33
PHYSIO CONTROL
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
A69851
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
6555
< *>
5411.33*
136818
06/07/93
$2,574.91
PIONEER MIDWEST INC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
47290 -91
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7350
< *>
$2,574.91*
136819
06/07/93
$.90
POMMER CO
VOL RECEPTION
032307
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
7702
36 *
136820
06/07/93
$210.00
POSTMASTER
MONTHLY NEWSLETTER MA
052793
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *)
$210.00*
136821
06/07/93
$598.53
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO
TOOLS
51093
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
6744
06/07/93
$175.72
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
51293
SEWER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7568
<*>
$774.25*
136822
06/07/93
$79736
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
STUMP REMOVAL
051493
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOV
. *
136823
06/07/93
$384.47
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
002725
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
7523
< *>
$384.47*
136824
06/07/93
$40.00
PRICE, JENNIFER
CLASS REFUND
051893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
136825
06/07/93
$27.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SPECIAL ORDER
92819
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
06/07/93
$21.78
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
MIX
95146
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$49.18*
136826
06/07/93
$2,268.45
PRO PRINT & GRAPHICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4500
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7072
< *>
$2,268.45*
136827
06/07/93
$145.00
QUALITY REFRIG
MAINT REF
113751
GRILL
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$145.00*
136828
06/07/93
$78.11
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
086886
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
06/07/93
$24.95
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
088368
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$103.06*
136829
06/07/93
$99.43
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
56336
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7452
<*>
$99.43*
136830
06/07/93
$15.92
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
HEAD PHONE
093196
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7598
< *>
$15.92*
136831
06/07/93
$50.00
RAINS, DIANE
PERFORM CL
JUNE 12
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 26
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR-
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-------------------------------------
136832
06/07/93
$441.06
- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REM SUPPLIES
GLOVES /BUG KILLER
3105
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7730
06/07/93
$122.27
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3110
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
5563.33*
136833
06/07/93
$164.35
RICHFIELD PLUMBING C
REPAIRS
9948
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
7714
< *>
5164.35*
136834
06/07/93
S4.25
RITZ CAMERA
CAMERA
LENS CLEANING SET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3758755
3758895
PUMP & LIFT ST
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
7448
7603
06/07/93
S21.28
RITZ
< *>
525.53*
136835
06/07/93
546.50
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
38705
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
5499
< *>
$46.50*
136836
06/07/93
55,439.00
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
913003
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
7584
06/07/93
51,251.13
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
13096
MAINT OF COURS
GASOLINE
9379
< *>
$6,690.13*
136837
06/07/93
519.15
ROSE BURNS CATERING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1459
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$19.15*
136838
06/07/93
$60.00
ROSLAND, KENNETH
MEETING EXPENSE
052693
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$178.08
ROSLAND, KENNETH
MEETING EXPENSE
052893
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
< *)
$238.08*
136839
06/07/93
$240.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
(*>
$240.00*
136840
06/07/93
$153.35
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
SEAL
0072981
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7731
< *>
$153 35*
136841
06/07/93
$70.69
S &S ARTS & CRAFTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1062694
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7457
< *>
$70.69*
136842
06/07/93
$151.23
SAFETY KLEEN
► ",Z. WASTE DISPOSAL
910675
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
06/07/93
$96.38
SAFETY KLEEN
BASKET CLEANER
M68494
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
< *>
$247.61*
136843
06/07/93
$110.17
SCHAFER EQUIP CO
TOOLS
166349
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7213
< *)
$110.17*
136844
06/07/93
$830.00
SCHLOSSER, KAY SHARK
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$830.00*
136845
06/07/93
$767.00
SCHMIDT, MICHAEL
TARGETS FOR GUN RANGE
102475
GUN RANGE
AMMUNITION
7775
< *>
S767.00*
136846
06/07/93
$59.00
SCHUMACHER. SANDRA
CLASS REFUND
051893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$59.00*
136841
06/07/93
$454.37
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
BREAD /ROLLS
052493
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$454.37*
e
136848
06/07/93
$75.00
SHASKIN, COLLEEN
SERVICES CL
JUNE 19
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
575.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 27
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. •
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136849
06/07/93
$244.45
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SIGNS & POSTS
3284
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
7368
06/07/93
$247.70
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
4222 -9
.ARENA BLDG /GRO
PAINT
7790
< *>
$492.15*
136850006/07/93
$257.50
SIGN SERVICE INC
AWNING CLEANING
00517708
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
4536
06/07/93
$175.00
SIGN SERVICE INC
AWNING CLEANING
00517708
VERNON OCCUPAN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$432.50*
136851
06/07/93
$24.72
SIITARI, MICHAEL
CONT EDUCATION
051793
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$24.72*
136852
06/07/93
$1,198.13
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
32398825
GOLF ADMINISTR
CST OF GD F00
6857
06/07/93
$1,198.13
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
32398825
GC CIP
CIP
06/07/93
- $1,198.13
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDE
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
32398825
GOLF ADMINISTR
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$1,198.13*
136853
06/07/93
$85.00
SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS
ADVERTISING
9980
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
06/07/93
$290.00
SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS
ADVERTISING
24925
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$375.00*
136854
06/07/93
$35.00
SOHNS, JOYCE A
REIMBURSEMENT /SEMINAR
052493
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$35.00*
136855
06/07/93
$90.53
SOKKIA MEASURING SYS
SURVEY SUPPLIES
106183
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
5108
< *>
$90.53*
136856
06/07/93
$52.00
SOUND PRODUCTS INC
REPAIRS
11397
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
7919
< *>
$52.00*
136857
06/07/93
$104.13
SOUTHCO INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
138193
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
7927
< *>
$104.13*
136858
06/07/93
$385.00
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
FLUSHING TAGS
2762
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7638
< *>
S385.00*
136859
06/07/93
$650.00
SPECTRUM SAFETY
LIFEGUARD SAFETY TRAI
EPK100 -1
POOL OPERATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$650.00*
136860
06/07/93
$65.90
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2031328
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7585
06/07/93
$16.41
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2038364
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
7592
06/07/93
$39.15
SPS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2038363
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7614
< *>
$121.46*
136861
06/07/93
$3,566.00
STANDARD HEATING & A
FURNACE /AC AIR CLEAN,
052593
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,566.00*
136862
06/07/93
$101.44
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
051993
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSON
<*>
$101.44*
136863
06/07/93
$315.00
STATE LAB OF HYGIENE
STDS FOR CERTIFICATIO
28934
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICE
< *>
$315.00*
136864
06/07/93
$15.00
STATE TREASURER
RENEWAL FEE /WASTE WAT
051993
TRAINING
LIC & PERMITS
06/07/93
$15.00
STATE TREASURER
CERTIFICATION RENEWAL
060193
TRAINING
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
530.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 28
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
- - - - --
----------------------------
136865
06/07/93
$25.00
-----------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEMPEL, MARJORIE
REFUND TENNIS LESSON
060193
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00*
136866
06/07/93
$130.73
STRETCHERS
ACCESSORIF :
65509.1
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7304
06/07/93
$138.13
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
65857.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
7487
06/07/93
$343.87
STREICHERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
65509.2
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
7304
< *>
$612.73*
13686706/07/93
$36.85
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
185239
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$28.54
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
185297
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$324.09
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
158530
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$281.91
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10103
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$290.71
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
159073
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS.
06/07/93
$0.36
SUBURBAN 'IEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
185920
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$125.80
SUBURBAN •ilEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
186034
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$46.73
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
HOSE
186191
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
BRAKE REPAIRS
159636
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
06/07/93
$7.83
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
BRACKETS
186344
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$40.02.
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CABLE
186417
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$1,282.84*
136868
06/07/93
$254.63
SUBURBAN PROPANE
LP FUEL
051793
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
<*>
$254.63*
136869
06/07/93
$90.00
SULLIVAN, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$90.00*
136870
06/07/93
$70.82
SYMANTEC
NORTIN UPGRADE 7.0
052493
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$70.82*
136871
06/07/93
$91.17
SYSTEMS SERVICE COMP
METER CHARTS
7345
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7809
< *>
$91.17*
136872
06/07/93
$29.18
TAPE DIST OF MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25777
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.18*
136873
06/07/93
$59.98
TARGET
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
451426
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
6551
06/07/93
¢59.60
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
450245
CITY COUNCIL
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
1151.44
TARGET
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
451425
COMMUNICATIONS
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/07/93
- 5231.52
TARGET
CREDIT
25350
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$39.50*
136874
06/07/93
$156.04
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
ACCESSORIES
53379
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7318
06/07/93
$32.17
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
REPAIR PARTS
0053802
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7318
< *>
$188.21*
136875
06/07/93
$498.47
TERRY ANN SALES CO
PLASTIC BAGS
1294
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
7916
< *>
$498.47*
136876
06/07/93
$341.87
TESSMAN SEED INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6999
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPL
7189
06/07/93
$29.30
TESSMAN SEED INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7000
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
7189
< *>
$371.17*
136877
06/07/93
$230.00
THE GREAT MINNESOTA
SEMINAR FESS 447 & A5
042393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
7247
< *>
$230.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 29
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. �
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136878
06/07/93
$510.05
THE HOWE COMPANY
FERTILIZER
050493
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
7700
< *>
$510.05*
136879
06/07/93
$2,008.63
THE PIRKL ASSOC.
NEW 9 HOLE BRAEMAR
052893
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$2,008.63*
136880
06/07/93
$120.56
THE PRINT SHOP
RECYCLING FLYERS
9436
RECYCLING
PRINTING
7283
06/07/93
$483.00
THE PRINT SHOP
MONTHLY NEWSLETTER
21481
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7601
< *>
$603.56*
136881
06/07/93
$31.31
THERMAL CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2065729
CIVIL DEFENSE
GENERAL SUPPL
7372
< *>
$31.31*
136882
06/07/93
$25.20
THOMPSON, BETTY
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$25.20*
136883
06/07/93
$14,588.01
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROSECUTING
74117
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
< ■>
$14,588.01*
136884
06/07/93
$9,412.45
THORPE DISTR.
BEER
MAY VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/07/93
$130.85
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
MAY VERN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$9,543.30*
136885
06/07/93
$1,269.00
TOIVONEN PAINTING
CONTRACTED PAINTING
051293
POOL OPERATION
PAINT
7692
< *>
$1,269.00*
136886
06/07/93
$130.90
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
462400
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPL
06/07/93
$55.08
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
221847
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7579
06/07/93
$21.27
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
222743
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
7683
< *>
$207.25*
136887
06/07/93
$1,837.13
TONKA WOODWORKS
1/2 PAYMENT -RACKS
040393
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
< *>
$1,837.13*
136888
06/07/93
$274.77
TOOLS BY OLSEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
51074
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7516
06/07/93
$74.56
TOOLS BY OLSEN
REPAIR PARTS
51267.
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7524
< *>
$349.33*
136889
06/07/93
$6,867.80
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTE
15% DOWNPAYMENT /CONTR
060193
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
< *>
$6,867.80*
136890
06/07/93
$2,500.00
TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
CONT EDUCATION
034028
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$2,500.00*
136891
06/07/93
$383.40
TRANSPORT WHITEGMC I
ALARM
104693
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7649
< *>
$383.40*
136892
06/07/93
$6.00
TRANSWORLD SYSTEM IN
AMBULANCE FEES
052093
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$6.00*
136893
06/07/93
$428.69-
TRI- COUNTY DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
296890
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7265
06/07/93
$47.70
TRI - COUNTY DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
296900
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7265
06/07/93
$66.92
TRI - COUNTY DISTRIBUT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
299330
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD F00
7666
< *>
$543.31*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 30
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM - -
- - - - --
- -- OBJECT
---------------
P.-O. #
- --
-------------------------------
136894
06/07/93
$9.45
- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------
TRIARCO A :.rs & CRAFT
FRF!''HT /ART SUPPLIES
71377
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7409
06/07/93
$114.89
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CI ?:''.IS /PLAYGROUND
72243
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7602
< *>
$124.34*
136895
06/07/93
$34.13
TROPHY WORLD
TROPHY
9978
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
7545
<*>
$34.13*
136896
06/07/93
$47:25
TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN -MT-
CUIJfRACTED REPAIRS
12193
GENERAL TURF C
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$47.25*
136897
06/07/93
$358.05
TURF SUPPLY
WEED SPRAY
043050
GENERAL TURF C
WEED SPRAY
7583
< *>
$358.05*
136898
06/07/93
$329.94
TWIN CI7: ''OSE INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
093338
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7311
<*>
$329.94*
-
136899
06/07/93
$185.75
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
404025
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$185.75*
136900
06/07/93
$183.75
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
67SI 235
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
7221
06/07/93
$82.95
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
70SI 695
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7209
06/07/93
$120.89
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 236
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
7333
06/07/93
$5.78
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
67SI 232
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
6905
06/07/93
$353.27
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 236
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
7338
06/07/93
$36.16
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67DI 937
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
6805
06/07/93
$255.84
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
67SI 238
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
7589
06/07/93
$127.93
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
L'' ""
67SI 239
CLUB HOUSL
REPAIR PARTS
7675
< *>
$1,166.57*
136901
06/07/93
$225.00
UNIVERSITY OF ST THO
SEMINAR
060193
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$225:00*
136902
06/07/93
$235.53
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
-050193/E
ED BUILDING &
TELEPHONE
<*>
$235.53*
136903
06/07/93
$388.29
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$60.07
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$188.58
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$349.59
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$168.94
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
GOLF DOME
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$668.35
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
ED BUILDING &
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$608.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
POOL TRACK GRE
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$266.99
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$53.78
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
JUNE 7,
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$733.30
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TEI.rr'IIONE
JUNE 7,
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
06/07/93
$194.72
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELL BONE
JUNE 7,
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
< *>
$3,680.61*
136904
06/07/93
$22.90
US WEST PAGING
PAGER FOR VINCE
052093
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
7888
<*>
$22.90*
136905
06/07/93
$432.22
USAQUATICS
STAINLESS STEEL BASKE
10033
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$432.22*
136906
06/07/93
$84.60
VALLIERE, JOHN
REPLACE CHECK # 12886
051793
GOLF ADMINISTR
MEETING EXPEN
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
THU, JUN
3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 31
CHECK#
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*>
$84.60*
136907
06/07/93
$77.60
VAN 0 LITE INC
12V BOLTS
55873
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
7225
( *>
$77.60*
136908
06/07/93
$495.00
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
INSTALL LITES
12521
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
7463
06/07/93
$322.06
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
0/S LITE MAINT
12522
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQU
7712
< *>
$817.06*
136909
06/07/93
$26.07
VEITH, MICHELLE
PRINTING
052793
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PRINTING
( *>
$26.07*
136910
06/07/93
$81.45
VETERAN ELECTRONICS
EQUIPMENT MAINT
52812
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
( *>
$81.45*
136911
06/07/93
$75.00
VICE, GARY
PERFORM CL 6/3/93
051393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
( *>
$75.00*
136912
06/07/93
$364.23
VIKING SAFETY PRODUC
SAFETY GLASSES
489656
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
7063
(*>
$364.23*
136913
06/07/93
$40.50
VOILES, ANNA
ART WORK SOLD
052593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
( *>
$40.50*
136914
06/07/93
$194.53
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
223544
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
7386
06/07/93
$322.98
VOSS LIGHTING
ELEC REPAIR
224242
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7643
< *>
$517.51*
136915
06/07/93
$84.41
W W GRAINGER
TOOLS
498 -6204
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7388
06/07/93
- 327.20
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
498 -6208
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
06/07/93
$50.40
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
498 -6208
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
7380
06/07/93
$175.53
W W GRAINGER
TOOLS
498 -6204
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7388
06/07/93
$57.21
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
498 -6218
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
7388
06/07/93
$185.10
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
498 -6218
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7427
< *>
$525.45*
136916
06/07/93
$100.00
WALBRIDGE, DAVID
PERFORM CL
JUNE 12
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
( *>
$100.00*
136917
06/07/93
$79.24
WALKER, MERWYN
MILEAGE
060793
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
< *>
$79.24*
136918
06/07/93
$141.10
WATERSTREET, JOAN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
06/07/93
$30.57
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MEETING EXPENSE
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$11.25
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
06/07/93
$196.32
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$21.79
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/07/93
$21.38
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MEETING EXPENSE
051893
RESERVE PROGRA
MEETING EXPEN
06/07/93
$18.00
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051893
RESERVE PROGRA
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$6.02
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051893
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$446.43*
136919
06/07/93
$224.79
WEEKEND FREEDOM
SERVICE CONTRACT
071273
ED BUILDING &
FERTILIZER
< *>
$224.79*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM
page 32
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR-
DESCRIPTION
- - - - --
INVOICE
- -
- -- PROGRAM
--------
OB3ECT------
P_0_- * ------
------------------------------------
136920
06/07/93
$90.00
- - -- ---------------
WERT, CAPRICE
--
CLEANING
016310
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
4394
06/07/93
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
CLEANING
016311
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
4395
< *>
$180.00*
136921
06/07/93
$334.98
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELD SUPPLY CO.
DRILL BIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
97733
97938
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPL
GENERAL SUPPL
7208
7115
06/07/93
$367.56
WEST
< *>
$702.54*
136922
06/07/93
$471.29
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
VALVE SEAL /GASKET
38616
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
7134
< *>
$471.29*
136923
06/07/93
$313.84
WHEELER LUMBER
TIMBERS
1220 -087
MAINT OF COURS
LUMBER
7609
< *>
$313.84*
136924
06/07/93
$288.00
WICKER,.CYD
AC INSTRUCTOR
060193
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$288.00*
136925
06/07/93
$470.00
WILLIAM B MONTAGUE C
PRINTING
050593.
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
< *>
-
$470.00*
136926
06/07/93
$284.71
WILLIAMS STEEL
WILLIAMS STEEL
TOOLS
CUTTING OIL
485274 -0
488405 -0
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPL
7321
7596
06/07/93
$68.83
< *>
$353.54*
136927
06/07/93
$35.00
WILLMAR SECTIONAL FI
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032793
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$35.00*
136928
06/07/93
$60.00
WINE SPECTATOR
WINE SPECTATOR
WINE SPECTATOR
042893
042893.
LIQUOR 50TH ST
VERNON SELLING
DUES & SUBSCR
CST OF GDS MI
06/07/93
$37.50
WINE-SPECTATOR
< *>
$97.50*
136929
06/07/93
$1,490.00
WIRING PLUS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
060193
GOLF ADMINISTR
SAFETY EQUIPM
6858
< *>
$1,490.00*
136930
06/07/93
$300.30
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
SALES TAX
83542
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$300.30*
136931
06/07/93
$420.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
PLANT TREES
PLANT TREES
2381
2380
TREES & MAINTE
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
PLANT & TREES
7790
7758
06/07/93
$480.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
< *>
$900.00*
136932
06/07/93
$42.93
WOLD, MIKE
REIMBURSE CHANGE FUND
052493
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$42.93*
136933
06/07/93
$537.72
WRIGHT LINE
POCKET FOLDERS /FILE S
052493
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$68.07
WRIGHT LINE
FILE SUPPORTS /LEGAL &
052493
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$605.79*
136934
06/07/93
$41.62
XEROX CORP
CARF COVERS
14969216
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL
7494
136935
06/07/93
- $123.97
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
54187266
ED ADMINISTRAT
SAFETY EQUIPM
06/07/93
$24.65
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE.
DRUGS .
54187357
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/07/93
$112.23
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
54187262
ED ADMINISTRAT
SAFETY EQUIPM
< *>
512.91*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:49 AM page 32
CHECK• DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
136936 06/07/93 $4.19 ZIEGLER INC ELEMENT 8C87514 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7378
06/07/93 $60.29 ZIEGLER INC REGULATOR /GASKET 8C92267 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7631
< *> 564.48*
136937 06/07/93 $40.00 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 060193 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIE
06/07/93 $210.00 ZINN, BOBO AC INSTRUCTOR 060193 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
< *>
$250.00*
$637,510.45*
COUNCIL
CHECK SUMMARY
THU, JUN 3, 1993, 2:52 AM page 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND #
10
- - - - -- -
$211,529.74
FUND #
11
$5,206.00
FUND #
12
$754.59
FUND #
15
$673.24
FUND #
23
$12,819.07
FUND #
26
$6,848.70
FUND #
27
$40,930.29
FUND #
28
$9,421.53
FUND #
29
$1,298.01
FUND #
30
$30,057.81
FUND #
40
$279,572.57
FUND #
41
$1,095.32
FUND #
42
$120.56
FUND #
50
$31,572.27
FUND #
60
$5,610.95
$637,510.45"