HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-06-21_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 21, 1993
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such
items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the
Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of June 7, 1993
II. GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT - Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil Property
* III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - Larry Fuglesten
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of June 7, 1993
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion -to close hearing. If Council wishes to
proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass if improvement petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required
if no petition.
A. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -383 - Post Lane
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Re -Roof On -Half of Public Works Building
* B. Maintenance Contract Renewal - Vote Tabulators
* C. Emergency Repair - Well No. 11
* D. Change Order - Normandale Golf Course
E. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -383
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Report of Study Committee for Sexually'Oriented Businesses
B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 8, 1993
C. Traffic Safety Policies
D. Report on In /Out Traffic - The Spaghetti Shop, 4933 France Av So
E. Honeywell Energy Savings Program
F. Appointments - Community Education Services Board
G. Appointment - Community Health Services Advisory Committee (Provider)
H. Open Meeting Law
I. Joint Power Agreements - Bloomington and Eden Prairie
Agenda
Edina City Council
June 21, 1993
Page Two
VI. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter Regarding Rainbow Store - Fred Kraft, 4604 France Av So
B. Letter Regarding Accessibility at Kuhlman Field - Gary C. Reiter, 5316
Birchcrest Dr
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
X. FINANCE
* A. Resolution Providing Execution and Delivery of First Supplemental Indenture,
First Amendment to Loan Agreement and Authorizing Other Matters Relating to
Multi- Family Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project), Series
1990
* B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 06/16/93 Total: $1,371,330.38 and, for
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 06/10/93 Total: $335,630.77
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
/EVENTS
Mon
July
5
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues
July
6
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
Mon
July
19
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
Mon
Aug
2
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambe.
Mon
Aug
16
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JUNE 7, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF HRA ]MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993, APPROVED Notion was made by
Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the BRA
Minutes of May 17, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
REBATE OF EXCESS TAB INCREMENTS TO EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVED Executive
Director Hughes explained that a letter had been received from the Board of
Education for the Edina Public Schools requesting that the HRA rebate the
excess tax increments resulting from the 1988 excess levy referendum. The
rebate for 1993 would be $20,000.00. The proposed rebate would be collected
only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District.
A similar rebate to the School District has been granted previously in 1991
and 1992. In 1991, the School District used the rebated funds to recondition
tennis courts at the Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the
cost of rehabilitating the track at Kuhlman Field. The School District
proposes to use the 1993 rebate to improve handicap accessibility to the
seating area of Kuhlman field stadium complex and to upgrade the press box
facility. An alternative use would be using the rebate to replace the playing
surface in the field house at Edina High School. The School District pointed
out that these facilities receive use by residents of the City.
The requested rebate is for 1993 only. Future rebates would be considered on
a year -by -year basis.
After a brief discussion, Commissioner Kelly introduced the following
Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina,
Minnesota, does hereby approve payment of rebate of excess tax increments in
the amount of $20,000.00 from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District
for the year 1993 to Independent School District No. 273 to be used'for
replacement of the playing surface in the Edina High School Field House.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*CIAIMS PAID Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by
Commissioner Rice to approve payment of BRA claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated June 3. 1993, and consisting of one page totalling.
$23.940.06.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
r.
Oe1 `'r
�rJtl L REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
�RMM'
tl /
To: HRA
Agenda Item #
' "-
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: JUNE 21, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
0
To HRA
Subject:
❑
To Council
KUNZ OIL/LEWIS ENGINEERING
Action
❑
Motion
REDEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
In accordance with your request, we have placed the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering matter
on the HRA Agenda for discussion purposes. The following background information is
provided to assist the HRA in its discussions.
Info /Background:
Tax Increment Financing District
The Kunz Oil/Lewis Engineering properties are located within the Grandview Tax
Increment Financing District. This district was established in 1984 and will terminate in
2010 (the district may be terminated earlier if all outstanding public indebtedness is repaid
prior to 2010). The present bonded indebtedness of the Grandview Tax Increment District
is approximately $1,700,000.00. The annual debt service required to retire outstanding
bonds is approximately $220,000.00. The HRA anticipates receiving approximately
$700,000.00 in tax increment in calendar year 1993. Therefore, the Grandview Tax
Increment Financing District is currently generating approximately $480,000.00 per year
in excess of that needed to service the outstanding bonds.
Grandview Projects Completed
Since the ' establishment of the Tax Increment Financing District in 1984, a number of
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - KUNZ OIL/LEWIS ENGINEERING
June 21, 1993
Page two
projects envisioned by the redevelopment plan have been undertaken. These projects
include the redevelopment of the Jerry's Shopping Area, the construction of the Grandview
Public Parking Ramp and Public Works Facility, the Summit Point Senior Citizen Residence,
the redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel, and the reconstruction of Link Road and the
closure of the Vernon and Eden intersection.
Remaining Projects
Projects envisioned by the redevelopment plan that have not as yet been completed, include
redevelopment of the Regis site, redevelopment of the Kunz Oil/Lewis Engineering site,
redevelopment of the Edina Public School bus garage and changes to the cross - section of
Vernon Avenue between Highway 100 and Interlachen Boulevard.
HRA Involvement in the Kunz Oil /Lewis En 'nom eering Site
For discussion purposes, the HRA could consider involvement in the following ways:
1. Acquire properties without immediate resale opportunity and issue a request for
proposals to the development community.
Advantages:
- Maximum control of development options
- Creates a competitive environment for developer proposals
Disadvantages:
- Risky given tax increment financing and property tax law uncertainties
- Unprecedented in Edina
- HRA may be liable for relocation expenses of existing owners
- HRA assumes some responsibility for environmental problems that may exist on
the site
2. Acquire land for immediate resale to a known developer for development pursuant
to a previously negotiated redevelopment agreement (this method is similar to what
was done at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes).
Advantages:
- Less risky than No. 1.
- HRA is certain as to the developer, the development and the financial
obligations prior to acquire to acquiring land `
- Developer and property owner negotiate price of land (this may also be a
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - KUNZ OIL/LEWIS ENGINEERING
June' 21, 1993
Page three
disadvantage)
Disadvantages:
- Some risk depending upon the structure of a redevelopment contract
3. HRA prepares an illustrative development plan for the property (an illustrative
development plan would schematically show a hypothetical development on the
property)
Advantages:
Solidifies the City's land use goals for the property
- Provides guidance and motivation for the property owner
Disadvantages:
- May infer that the cities will provide financial assistance
- May be difficult to deny a development consistent with the illustrative
development plan
4. Unilateral rezoning of property (the City rezones the property without receiving a
petition from the property owners)
Advantages:
- Uses regulatory tools rather than fiscal tools to affect change
Disadvantages:
- Legal issues (property owners may object to the rezoning)
Estimated Market Value of Property
The HRA obtained an estimate of value in 1990 from an independent real estate
consultant. At that time, our consultant estimated the value of the Lewis Engineering
property to be $1,500,000.00 and the value of Kunz Oil property to be $900,000.00. .
The 1993 assessor's estimated market value of the Lewis Engineering property is
$975,000.00. This value was established by the Board of Review in 1992, after receiving
testimony from the property owner who argued for a valuation of $800,000.00. The
assessor's market value prior to adjustment by the Board of Review was $1,200,000.00.
The assessor's estimated market value of the Kunz Oil property is $688,000.00.
The HRA should obtain an update of the 1990 independent appraisal if it wishes to
pursue more active involvement in this property.
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN
16, 1993, 11:11 PM
11RA
COUNCIL DATE 6/21/93 page 1
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12443
06/21/93
$30.00
AHO, CHRISTINE
REFUND PARKING PERMIT
190
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
$30.00*
12444
06/21/93
$34,235.25
ARTEKA CORP
RES IMPROV
21035 -6
CENTENNIAL LAK
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$34,235.25*
12445
06/21/93
$1,034.95
BANNER CREATIONS
BANNERS
71596
50TH STREET
STREET IMPROV
< *>
$1,034.95*
12446
06/21/93
$30.00
FALKENBORG, CINDY
REFUND PARKING PERMIT
456
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMI
< *>
530.00*
12447
06/21/93
$2,758.35
HOIGAARD'S
TABLE & CHAIRS
96029
50TH STREET
STREET IMPROV 480
< *>
$2,758.35*
12448
06/21/93
$8,800.00
MASTER ASPHALT COMPA
RES IMPROV
6792
CENTENNIAL LAK
RESID IMPROVE
< *>
$8,800.00*
$46,888.55*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, JUN 16, 1993, 11:10 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
FUND # 01 $46,888.55
$46.888.55"
o e (i tit
O
a.
'`cnR POFiA�/
1RR8
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Larry Fugleston, Principal of Cornelia School, assisted the Edina Human
Relations Commission in a strategic planning process; and
WHEREAS, throughout this process, Larry donated his time during three lengthy sessions
in February, March and June of 1993, as he guided the Commissioners
through the development of a mission statement, objectives and action items;
and
WHEREAS, he willingly shared his expertise as the Coordinator of Strategic Planning for
Edina Schools with the City of Edina, benefiting the Human Relations
Commission in its first effort in comprehensive planning; and
WHEREAS, serving as the Principal of Cornelia Elementary School for the last three years
and leading that school successfully forward with a productive and active PTA
parent group, a cooperative planting of trees with the City and a sister - school
partnership with a school in Wyoming, Larry has demonstrated the ability to
step in and get the job done - -and then even go beyond that with his generous
volunteering of time and talent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council expresses its thanks
and appreciation on behalf of the Human Relations Commission to
LARRY FUGLESTEN
for his dedication in working with people in order to help them be productive in their service
to the City of Edina and the Schools.
ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 1993.
MAYOR
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 7, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION PRESENTED TO TIMOTHY EICKHOFF Manager Rosland
presented a Proclamation of Appreciation plaque to citizen Timothy Eickhoff for
his efforts on April 6, 1993 in stopping to reassure a distraught female who was
on the France Avenue bridge over the Crosstown Highway that her problems could be
worked out. Mr. Eickhoff asked a passing motorist to call the police by mobile
telephone and continued to encourage her until she agreed to step back over the
railing and was taken into custody upon arrival of Officer Riegert. The Council
Members extended their appreciation and thanks to Mr. Eickhoff for his concern,
courage and involvement.
EMPLOYEE ROBERT LAWSON COMMENDED Manager Rosland commended Robert Lawson, lead
paramedic, for his part in the extraordinary efforts made in responding to the
9 -1 -1 call on March 1, 1993 to an Edina residence which developed into a double
cardiac arrest. He explained that Mr. Lawson was not available when
commendations were presented earlier to the other public safety employees who
were involved in the case.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded
by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
FINAL REZONING FROM POD -1 PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT
GRANTED FOR PROPERTY AT 6400 FRANCE AVENUE (BTO DEVELOPMENT"AIRVIEW DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen reminded Council that the subject property is located at 6400
France Avenue South. He recalled that at the meeting of February 16, 1993,
preliminary rezoning from Planned Office District, POD -1 to Automobile Parking
District (APD) was granted to allow for redevelopment of the property as a
surface parking lot for use by employees of Fairview Southdale Hospital. The
proponents are now seeking final rezoning approval.
At the hearing for preliminary rezoning, the Council was concerned that the City
would have no control if in the future the hospital desired to construct a ramp
on the property. In response, staff proposed an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance to make parking structures a Conditional Use in the APD zone, which
amendment was subsequently adopted. Staff would recommend final rezoning
approval conditioned on: 1) Continued use. of MNDOT property adjacent to the
Crosstown Highway as a condition to the variance from the required 10 foot
setback from the northerly property line, 2) Continuation of the shuttle bus
service from the lot to the hospital, 3) Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
grading permit.
Public Comment
Mayor Richards called for public comment on the request for final rezoning
approval from Planned Office District, POD -1 to Automobile Parking District
(APD). No objection or comment was heard.
Council Action
Member Rice made a motion for Second Reading and adoption of the following
ordinance, subject to: 1) Continued use of ENDOT property adjacent to the
Crosstown Highway, 2) Shuttle bus service from lot to the hospital, and
3) Nine Mile Watershed District grading permit:
ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT (APD)
FROM PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is
amended by adding the following thereto:
"The extent of the Automobile Parking District (APD) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
Lot 1, Block 1, Southdale Office Park Addition, except that part
thereof which lies Easterly of a line drawn parallel with and 48 feet
Westerly of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 30, Township.28, Range 24; thence ram Northerly along
Easterly line of said section for a distance of 630.60 feet; thence
deflect left at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of 10 feet;
thence deflect right at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of 100
feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described;
thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of
5729.58 feet (delta angle 1 degrees 09 minutes 00 seconds) for a
distance of 115 feet; thence tangent to said curve for a distance of
84.30 feet; thence deflect right along a tangential curve having a
radius of 5729.58 feet (delta angle 0 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds)
for a distance of 84.84 feet to the point of reverse curve; thence
Northwesterly along said reverse curve having a radius of 123 feet a
distance of 140 feet and there terminating, according to the plat
thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles
in and for Hennepin County."
The extent of the POD -1 Planned Office District is reduced by removing the
property described above from the POD -1 District." ,
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its
passage and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,,Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
REQUEST OF WATSON CENTERS/RAINBOW FOODS DENIED FOR REZONING (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT TO PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
(INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL) FOR LEWIS ENGINEERING/KM OIL PROPERTY)
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen recalled that the proposal of Watson Centers /Rainbow Foods to
rezone the Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil property from Industrial to Commercial
(PCD -2) and to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation from Industrial to
Commercial was first heard by the Council on April 19, 1993. Council continued
the hearing and directed staff to hire BRW to analyze the traffic impacts of the
proposal relative to other potential reuses of the property and relative to what
had recently been approved or planned for the Grandview area.
Planner Larsen advised that the traffic study has been completed and is presented
for Council review. It has been made available to the proponents as well as to
other property owners in the area who have expressed interest. Notice of the
June 7, 1993, hearing has been sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the
subject property.
Presentation by BRW Howard Preston, BRW, explained that the original Grandview
Area Traffic Study was completed by BRW for the City of Edina in April of 1984.
The study was updated in 1990 to determine the impacts resulting from the
retail /office /Jerry's Foods expansion between Eden Avenue and existing Jerry's
Foods -and retail/bus garage land uses southeast of the existing Eden
Avenue /Sherwood Road intersection.
The area southeast of the existing Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road intersection is
currently proposed to be redeveloped to provide a Rainbow Foods supermarket and a
fast -food restaurant. The area southwest of the existing Vernon Avenue /TH 100
southbound ramps intersection is also proposed to be redeveloped to include a
video store, a restaurant, a drug store, a funeral home and a hair salon. In
addition, other minor redevelopments have recently occurred within the Grandview
area that were not accounted for in the previous analysis.
As a result of these proposed land use changes and potential traffic
implications, the City retained BRW to conduct a second update of the Grandview
Area Traffic Study in order to address the potential traffic related issues.
In summary, Mr. Preston's presentation of the updated traffic study covered the
following components:
A. Grandview Area Existing Conditions
1. Existing Land Uses (including proposed and expected redevelopment
parcels)
2. Existing Transportation System (including key intersections)
3. Existing Traffic Volumes (ADT volumes on Vernon south of Link
Road and on Eden west of Arcadia are approximately 14,500
vehicles and 6,500 vehicles, respectively.
B. Planned Roadway System (no major roadway or traffic control
improvements currently planned)
C. Proposed /Expected Conditions (including area southeast of Eden
Avenue /Sherwood Road intersection; area southwest of Vernon Avenue /TH
100 southbound ramp intersection; automotive service store; school
bus garage site as proposed in the 1990 Traffic Study Update for.
expansion of Jerry's Foods and office space)
D. Trip Generation (estimated by using ITE rates for proposed land use
but not accounting for internal /linked trips or passerby trips)
E. Trip Distribution (comparison of market study estimates versus
vehicle trace study estimates)
F. Site - Generated Traffic Volume Forecasts (expected PM peak hour trips
assigned to surrounding roadway system at key intersections)
G. Post - Development Traffic Forecasts (based on existing traffic volumes
plus expected traffic generation at PM peak hours)
H. Traffic Analyses
1. Capacity Analysis (quality of traffic flow at key intersections
and along roadways)
2. Sunday Morning Capacity Analysis (possible traffic conflicts
between vehicles existing Our Lady of Grace Church and vehicles
oriented towards Rainbow Foods or Jerry's Foods)
3. Signal Warrant Analysis (potential for congestion mitigation)
4. Queuing Analysis (required vehicle storage distances at traffic
control devices)
5. Accident Analysis (Vernon Avenue at key intersection /accesses)
I. Geometric Alternatives for Eden Avenue (three -lane roadway with
center two -way left turn lane)
J. Secondary Access for Area South of Eden Avenue (Sherwood Road)
Conclusions of the Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2) were as follows:
1. Three alternative land use scenarios are being considered for the
redevelopment of the area south of Eden Avenue. The expected trip
generation from each scenario is as follows:
Rainbow /Fast -Food - 11,300 VPD
- Medium Density Residential - 1,180 VPD
Office /Office Showroom - 1,280 VPD
2. Other redevelopment in the area would ultimately add another 4,560 VPD
for a total of as much as 15,860 net new trips in the Grandview Area.
3. Existing traffic operations at all key public street intersections are
considered acceptable.
4. A "worst case" analysis of post redevelopment conditions indicates that
the level of congestion at all key public street intersections is expected
to increase but remain at acceptable levels.
5. The additional new trips generated by a grocery /fast food development
south of Eden Avenue will increase volumes and congestion on Eden to the
point where the roadway would need to be three lanes in order to provide an
acceptable level of traffic operations.
6. A "worst case" analysis of the total redevelopment being considered in
the Grandview Area indicates that Eden Avenue would have to be widened to
four lanes in order to provide acceptable levels of traffic operations.
7. A "worst case" analysis of the post redevelopment traffic volumes
indicates that queuing along Link Road (from the traffic signal at Vernon
Avenue) is likely to extend past Sherwood Road during peak traffic periods.
Recommendations of the Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2) were as follows:
A. Widen Eden Avenue from Sherwood Road to the TH 100 Southbound on -ramp
to a 44- foot.urban section (three 12 -foot lanes and 4 -foot shoulders) with
a center two -way, left -turn lane.
B. Provide a secondary access to the Sherwood neighborhood via a new road
that would be located between the existing Soo Line Railroad right -of -way
and the proposed Rainbow Foods store. The right -of -way for this access
roadway would need to be negotiated with Rainbow Foods.
C. Provide an exclusive right turning lane into the proposed Rainbow Foods
site off of Eden Avenue.
D. Monitor the traffic demands at the Vernon Avenue /Line Road intersection
following the Rainbow Foods development and adjust the traffic signal
timing if necessary.
E. Install.signage near the existing Super - America access drives onto Link
Road instructing motorists queued on Link Road not to physically block
left -turn access in /out of SuperAmerica.
D. Monitor the accident conditions at the Vernon Avenue /Interlachen
Boulevard intersection, particularly the westbound to southbound left -
turning movement, and construct an exclusive left turn lane with protective
signal phasing, if necessary.
Following the traffic study presentation, Mayor Richards called for public
comment on the redevelopment proposal by Watson Centers /Rainbow Foods for the
Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil site.
Public Comment
John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, said he was president of the Richmond Hills
Homeowners Association and that the members oppose the proposed Rainbow /Fast Food
Restaurant development because the traffic it would create would be ten times the
volume of any other development that has been proposed. He also questioned
widening Eden Avenue and what that would do to existing sidewalks. He asked
that the Council not rezone the property for this high volume use.
Rich Rosch, 5248 Richwood Drive, objected to the proposed development because it
would greatly increase traffic on Eden Avenue. He cited concerns about speeding,
the sharp turn uphill toward SuperAmerica, retaining wall blocking view for
drivers, and ice from cars exiting car wash in winter as existing problems. He
said Eden Avenue cannot handle more traffic.
Al Hoye, 5100 Richmond Circle, commented that in the last two years there has
been an increase of 21 children in the neighborhood. He voiced the following
objections: 1) traffic congestion on Eden will spill into the neighborhood making
the streets unsafe for the children, 2) Richmond/Windsor /56th will become
speedways during peak hours, and 3) impact of lights and noise level from the
Rainbow store.
Karen Roach, 5048 Richmond Drive, reiterated her concern for the safety of the
neighborhood children. She questioned whether the traffic counters had been in
place long enough to get an accurate count of the traffic volumes. Further, that
the increased traffic on Eden will make exiting SuperAmerica more difficult.
She asked the Council to vote against the Rainbow proposal for this site.
Dick Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street, urged the Council to not approve the
proposal. His concerns included inability to get in /out of their area and the
noise and pollution because of the number of trucks that would come to the
Rainbow site.
Dawn Kerrison, 6517 Willow Wood Road, voiced her support for the development
because of the increased tax dollars from the tax increment district that could
flow to the schools.
George Fischer, 7000 Tupa Drive, said he supported the development. He observed
that traffic and noise has increased in all of Edina, and that while he did not
live in the immediate neighborhood, he felt some competition may be needed.
Also, that the issue of the redevelopment of the property, which has been ongoing
since 1986 when multi - family was proposed, should be resolved.
Bill Raymond, 5104 Richmond Circle, raised the issue of police /security services
because of the increased traffic that would result if the Rainbow Store and
restaurant are approved.
Art Heiam, 5205 Richwood Drive, questioned the need for another supermarket in
and fast food restaurant in the area. He mentioned that the school buses would
have a problem in existing the bus garage as the traffic backs up now at times.
Also, he asked how the road could be widened because of the railroad bridge.
Cliff Thompson, 5252 Richwood Drive, said that at peak hours now he has to wait
to get onto Eden Avenue - adding the Rainbow Foods traffic will make it much
worse and questioned the advisability of the secondary road into the neighborhood
as it would be impossible to turn around to use the alternate street. He
concurred that the school buses will also be impacted as well as vehicles exiting
the church property. He asked the Council to vote against the proposal.
Denise McNaught, 5902 Olinger Road, commented that she has four adolescents and
does not shop at stores like Jerry's, Lunds or Byerlys. She said the Rainbow
Foods store would give her an alternative she could afford.
Laurie LoPesio, 5044 Oxford Avenue, said she was against the proposal for the
following reasons: 1) extra traffic and resulting air /noise /light pollution,
2) will attract drive -by traffic from TH 100, 3) safety for pedestrians, 4) a
mega store should not be adjacent to a residential area, 5) odor from fast food
restaurant, 6) potential for increased property taxes to pay for road
improvements, 7) should show support for existing businesses in area who have
been supportive of the community and not bring in competition, and 8) would
prefer multi - family housing as a land use for the site.
John Hatch, 5044 Richmond Drive, asked the Council to vote against the
development because it would mean more traffic, noise and lights and less safety
and quality of life for the people who live in the area.
Elaine Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street, commented that if the second roadway to
connect with Sherwood Road were constructed traffic would.find its-way into the .
neighborhood. Also, that the adjacent park area,would attract young people as a
place to smoke /drink and leave their fast food leftovers. She added that their
bedroom faces the parking lot and the 40 foot lights would be invasive.
Steve Altman, 5225 Richwood Drive, said that over the years the Richmond Hills
Homeowners Association has supported redevelopment of this site but are concerned
about the impact the proposed development would have on the neighborhood. He
commended the Council for its thoughtful deliberation of past proposals but
cautioned that rezoning would impact the neighborhood forever.
Presentation by Developer
Steve Watson, Watson Centers, Inc., said he would not repeat items covered in
their April 19, 1993, presentation but would only address new issues as follows:
1. Taxes Generated - Subject land is in the Grandview Tax Increment
District which today pays annual property taxes approximating $100,000.00. It is
anticipated that taxes would be at least $200,000 per year after construction.
2. Traffic Study.- Barton Ashman traffic assumptions were based on existing
volumes at four Rainbow Foods stores in the area, whereas BRW used national rates
from the ITE to project traffic volumes. BRW's conclusion was that the plan
would work.
3. Plan Changes - In response to neighborhood concerns the following
changes have been made: 1) produce loading dock was moved to the westerly side of
building away from nearby homes 2) rear loading docks were reoriented more
directly to the railroad and fast food restaurant was moved next to the railroad
berm, 3) easement to be granted allowing residents from the Richmond Hills
neighborhood access to Eden Avenue along the westerly property line.
In conclusion, Mr. Watson said if the proposal is approved this is merely the
first step in a long series of events to get the site approved in terms of exact
layout and configuration. They believe this is a good project, will add
competition to the grocery market, will increase the tax base and provide a
service that is needed and wanted in the City of Edina.
Dennis Crow, Rainbow Foods, said it is important to understand some of the issues
relative to the operation of the store that could influence a decision as to
whether this is a proper use for this location. He submitted the following
regarding some of the objections that have been raised:
A. Delivery of produce would be restricted so as to not occur during
nighttime hours.
B. Trace numbers used in the study by BRW were based on lack of additional
competition which will adversely affect trip generation direction.
C. Parking lot lighting can be designed to serve both the needs of the
community and Rainbow Foods.
He concluded by saying that Rainbow Foods is willing to work with the City and
the neighbors regarding any concerns and would encourage support of the project.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards asked for comment on the following three issues: 1) Proposed
second roadway along railroad right -of -way, 2) Expansion of Eden Avenue and
impact on the railway bridge, and 3) Who pays for the improvements to the road
system.
Mr. Preston answered that, from a transportation planning standpoint, the
Sherwood neighborhood is isolated in that there is only one way in /out. The
situation would be- potentially worse with the current proposal because of the
queuing that would extend back from the intersection of Vernon /Link. If an
alternative were available, residents might change their driving patterns to take
advantage of an access to Eden Avenue that they know would not be blocked. He
pointed out that the secondary access was recommended in the earlier BRW traffic
study when previous developments were considered. Mr. Watson commented that they
had offered the easement along the westerly side of the site for access to Eden
because they wanted to keep traffic away from the truck docking area.
Engineer Hoffman said the BRW traffic study shows that the proposed three -lane
36 -foot roadway could be accommodated under the bridge as it exists today.
However, there would be no four foot shoulder under the bridge for vehicular
stalls and break - downs. He added that, if the subject property were rezoned, the
secondary neighborhood access would be essential.
Planner Larsen replied that the cost of road improvements have not been discussed
with the proponents. Generally, improvements would be constructed in the public
right -of -way so cost could be covered by: 1) the City, 2) the HRA since it is a
tax increment district, 3) the developer, or 4) a negotiated combination.
'Member Paulus asked about the accident ratio for the site. Chief Bernhjelm
answered that there have been few reported accidents in the area, however, minor
fender - benders are normally unreported.
Member Rice stated he would not support amending the Comprehensive Plan or
rezoning to PCD -2 because he did not believe that retail /commercial development
is consistent with the intensity of land use appropriate for this site. Eden
Avenue has served historically as an access road to industrial property adjacent
to the railroad right -of -way. After the reconstruction of Highway 100, Eden
became more important as a direct link to the church, and in conjunction with the
west frontage road the main access to the residential neighborhood south of the
'church and east of the railroad tracks. Intensity of any retail /commercial full
density development is not consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan
and would change the character of the Grandview area from a neighborhood
shopping, service and convenience area to that of a major shopping center that
was never anticipated or planned for. Member Rice said he concurred with the
judgement of those who reviewed the land use of the site in 1980, 1984 and 1987
and did not believe it should be changed.
Mayor Richards commented that in an urban environment the City should not
necessarily control or dictate the results such as odor, lighting and noise as
such operational issues can usually be mitigated. These types of developments
are usually done in areas that are not yet fully developed and do not butt up
against residential areas. He said he did not share Member Rice's view that no
retail or commercial development should occur south of Eden /Link Road. However,
he was persuaded that what is presently proposed with the current roadway
configuration is too much for the site and would not be in the best interest of
the community. He felt government should not dictate land use as to whether
there -is or is not competition - that is best left to the marketplace. He said
he is flexible and would support redevelopment of the site, whether it be
commercial or retail, industrial or some type office /warehouse use other than
what is there presently. He mentioned that in the past he- 'had supported a
residential component for the site. Mayor Richards stated that he did not intend
to support the present proposal because the use is too intensive in light of what
is occurring in the Grandview redevelopment area and would err on the side of
caution to preserve the existing public and private infrastructure in the area.
Member Paulus commented that only a small percentage of the City's residents have
testified on the proposal and the Council is obligated to represent the whole
City and not a particular neighborhood even though it is impacted. Any vote must
be for the City as a whole and not for individual need. Numerous residents have
spoken to the children in the area which has always been an issue with change of
any sort. She said we must educate ourselves that Edina is not a countryside
suburban neighborhood - we are an urban city community with an exchange
population.. Though the site is currently zoned industrial, it is not unlike
other areas where Rainbow Foods stores have been built. As to comments that
another supermarket is not needed, she said that in an American capital society
she does not believe government has a right to decide what is necessary or not
the market will determine that issue. She said the realization is that there
will be no utopia for the redevelopment of that land because is extremely costly.
Whatever happens in the future will affect the neighborhood and also possibly the
City through use of public monies. Member Paulus said her greatest concern would
be the number of dollars the City would have to invest to correct the road
system's capacity and therefore she would not vote in favor of the rezoning.
Member Smith observed that much has been said about both the positive and
negative impacts of a development like Rainbow Foods. He said the turning point
comes when you look at the BRW Traffic Study ordered by the City and the
multitude of conclusions and recommendations to make this work. While the
recommendations were surprising, upon driving or walking through the area they
make sense. His major concern was that both the developer and the traffic
engineer say that a second access for the Sherwood neighborhood is needed if the
proposal is approved. He said he could not support the proposed redevelopment
because of the estimated volumes of traffic and the recognition of the need for a
second access. Member Smith told the affected residents that they must continue
to discuss what may go there in the future but must also acknowledge that the
property owner is a taxpayer with a right to redevelop his land instead just
paying taxes on vacant land.
Member Kelly said she wanted this proposed redevelopment to work yet after
hearing all the data in the traffic study she could not support it because of the
traffic issues. She suggested that Council have the Planning Commission go back
and look at this site, look at the Comprehensive Plan, and find a way to make
this area developable. Whatever happens there, she concurred that there will be
a need for a second access to the neighborhood and how it will be funded is an
issue. Member Kelly concluded by saying that the property should not be left
unoccupied much longer and the City may have to become aggressive in looking for
something that will be acceptable to all the citizens.
Mayor Richards then called for action by the Council on the redevelopment as
proposed for the Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil property.
Member Paulus made a motion to deny the request for rezoning from Planned
Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and Comprehensive Plan
designation from Industrial to Commercial for Levis Engineering/Kunz Oil
Property:
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
It was the consensus of the Council that the matter be placed on the Council
agenda for June 21, 1993, for discussion as to whether the HRA should become
proactive in redevelopment of the subject property.
*APPEAL OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION FOR SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR
6312 INDIAN HILLS ROAD WITHDRAWN Motion was made by Member Kelly and was
seconded by Member Rice to accept the written request of Gretchen Holland dated
June 4, 1993, withdrawing the appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision on
her request for a five foot sideyard setback variance at 6312 Indian Hills Road.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -8 ADOPTED (AMENDING CITY CODE TO ADDRESS USE OF AWNINGS,
CANOPIES AND MARQUEES AND TO CHANGE NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS PERMITTED IN THE
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT): SECOND READING WAIVED Planner Larsen informed the
Council that, following their direction, staff had prepared amendments to two
sections of the sign ordinance as follows:
1) Freestanding Signs. The ordinance was revised to allow one sign per
building in the PCD -2 District. Presently, the Code allows one
freestanding sign for each street frontage..
2) Awnings. The ordinance was revised to treat transparent or translucent
awnings as signs, whether illuminated or not.
If the Council adopts the amendments, waiver of Second Reading is recommended.
Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed ordinance amendment.
No comment or objection was heard.
Member Kelly moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -8 with waiver of Second Reading
as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO ADDRESS THE
USE OF AWNINGS, CANOPIES, AND MARQUEES AND TO CHANGE THE
NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS PERMITTED IN THE
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subd. 13 of Subsection 460.03 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Subd. 13 Awnings, Canopies, or Marquees.
A. Awnings, canopies or marquees shall be considered as part of the
wall area and thus shall not warrant additional sign area.
B. Awnings, canopies or marquees constructed of transparent or
translucent material shall be deemed to be a sign panel for purposes
of determining sign area."
Section 2. Subd. 4 of Subsection 460.05 is hereby amended to provide that
the maximum number of freestanding signs
one per building.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be
upon its adoption.
ATTEST:
allowed in the PCD -2 District shall be
in full force and effect immediately
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion was for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,
Ordinance adopted.
Rice, Smith, Richards
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -9 ADOPTED (LIFTING MORATORIUM ON ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS
AND AWNINGS BY REPEALING SECTION 461 OF THE CITY CODE): SECOND READING WAIVED
Planner Larsen reported that, following adoption of the sign ordinance
amendments, staff would recommend lifting the moratorium on the issuance of sign
permits.
Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -9 with waiver of Second
Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -9
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO
LIFT THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR
SIGNS AND AWNINGS BY REPEALING SECTION 461
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 461 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its adoption.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
CITY AND RESIDENTS THANKED PUBLICLY FOR COOPERATION WITH THE EDINA ART FAIR
Karen Knudsen, Executive Director of the Edina 50th and France Association,
publicly thanked the City and the residents for their cooperation in making the
Annual Edina Art Fair, held on June 4, 5, and 6, a huge success. She especially
thanked the Public Works Department, the Police Department (both officers and
reserves), the Park and Recreation Department, Health and Licensing for their
assistance and the surrounding neighbors who had to cope with the vehicular and
pedestrian traffic.
*BID AWARDED FOR ARTICULATED SIDEWALK PLOW Motion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for an articulated sidewalk plow to
recommended second low bidder, MacQueen Equipment, at $59,734.00. (Low bidder
did not meet specifications).
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FOUR -WHEEL DRIVE UTILITY TRACTOR WITH CAB/DETACHABLE LOADER
Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid
for a four -wheel drive utility tractor with cab /detachable loader to recommended
low bidder, Scharber & Sons, at $22,500.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR UNLEADED GASOLINE FOR MAINTENANCE AT BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion
was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for
unleaded gasoline for maintenance at Braemar .Golf Course to Rollins Oil Company,
not to exceed $13,000.00, per Hennepin County contract #26403 -232.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS Motion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for 4th of July fireworks to sole
bidder. Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc., at $7,300.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
CURB COT REQUEST ON THIELEN AVENUE DENIED FOR 5621 WOOD LANE, ST. LOUIS PARK
Engineer Hoffman reminded Council that, under a new ordinance, residents must
apply for a curb cut permit onto City streets when replacing or adding new curb
openings. Property owners at 5621 Wood Lane, St. Louis Park, have applied to
access Thielen Avenue for a garage installation on the backside of their Wood
Lane property. The applicant has submitted a request and had appropriate
surveying completed to determine if access is possible. Also, staff has
discussed this issue with the applicant and had requested a letter describing the
conditions that the applicant would be agreeing to if a curb cut was granted.
Engineer Hoffman noted that a letter dated June 3, 1993, had been received from
Stephanie J. Leckband, 5621 Wood Lane, confirming their understanding of the
specific conditions suggested by staff.
Engineer Hoffman advised that there are residents on Thielen Avenue would not
like to see an additional curb cut granted. The ordinance does not provide for
public hearings on requests for curb cuts. However, because this matter is
controversial it has been referred to the Council for review and decision.
Proponent Comment
Proponent Robin Pinck, 5621 Wood Lane, pointed out that St. Louis Park had
granted them a 15 foot setback variance to construct a new garage. A survey
report indicated that their property does abut Thielen Avenue. They plan to
construct a hammerhead turnaround on their property for safety reasons. They are
also concerned about aesthetics and plan on adding vegetation and decorative
fencing. The garage would be low profile with a hip roof and the curb cut would
be 12 feet wide located as far to the easterly property line as possible so that
Thielen Avenue would still be viewed as a dead end street. Ms.-Pinck said they,
too, are concerned with the appearance of the neighborhood and would do nothing
that would detract, become a safety issue or affect property values but would
like to use their property to its utmost potential.
Public Comment
Tim Egan, 4369 Thielen Avenue, the residents on Thielen Avenue had no problem
with the variance for construction of a two car garage on the property but
objected to proposed access off Thielen. He explained that there is an existing
driveway from Wood Lane in St. Louis Park that could provide access the new
garage. He noted that the proponents pay property taxes to St. Louis Park and
submitted that none of the residents on Thielen could build a garage within 35
feet of the street. He argued that a 12 foot driveway will lead to additional
confusion for drivers who will think it is a through street. Because of the
confusion resulting from the variance from granted by St. Louis Park and the
request for curb cut from Edina, the residents hired an attorney to represent
them on this matter.
Attorney Bill Egan, 2000 Lincoln Center, Minneapolis, spoke to the memorandum he
had submitted to the Council to assist the Thielen Avenue residents in opposing
the curb cut from Thielen. The question was raised as to whether Edina had legal
authority to deny the application to use Thielen Avenue for access to the lot
from the rear. Based upon his research, the answer is "yes" because the
proponents do not have a right of access to Thielen Avenue because they are not
owners of property "abutting" Thielen Avenue in the legal sense of the word.
Thielen is an Edina street and the applicants are residents of St. Louis Park.
Neither they or their predecessors in interest have ever paid property taxes for
the support of the street, have not paid special assessments for construction or
repaving of the street, curbs or sidewalks and have not paid for snow removal or
other maintenance of the street.
Although. the City of St. Louis Park granted the variance, it deferred to the City
of Edina the issue of whether access to the property would be permitted from
Thielen Avenue. Mr. Egan said that given the objections of the Thielen Avenue
residents and the clear showing that the proposed driveway will alter the
character of the surrounding property on Thielen Avenue and also for health and
safety reasons the Council should deny the application.
Also speaking in opposition to access from Thielen Avenue were Peter Worthington,
4381 Thielen Avenue; Les Kraus and Susan Rosenthal- Kraus, 4375 Thielen Avenue;
and Elaine Bonn, 4385 Thielen Avenue.
Proponent Stephanie Lenck, 5621 Wood Lane, spoke to the issue of aesthetics and
argued that because they have requested access from Thielen the garage could be
placed further back from Thielen and the residents would see less of the garage.
She pointed out that the existing vegetation is on their property and not on the
street right of way and that they intend to replace as much of the vegetation as
possible.
Council Comment /Action
Responding to Member Paulus, Engineer Hoffman said the proponents could still
build the garage with access from Wood Lane in St. Louis Park.
Member Rice asked whether the proponents intended to build the garage with or
without the requested curb cut. The proponents responded that if the curb cut
was denied the location of the garage would change. They would need to ask
St. Louis Park for a variance for a rear yard setback from their ordinance
standards.
Member Smith made a motion to deny the request for a curb cut from Thielen Avenue
for property at 5621 good Lane, St. Louis Park. Motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.
Member Kelly commented that the Council's charge is to protect the integrity of
Edina neighborhoods. This is a special neighborhood and .Thielen Avenue was not
designed to have a house with a curb cut the end. There is also a safety issue
not only for the residents on Thielen but also for the proponents, i.e. emergency
vehicles, snow plowing, etc. and the proponents do not support the neighborhood
through property taxes.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
INTERIR TRAFFIC REPORT GIVEN FOR COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT Engineer Hoffman
explained that City staff has been working with Dennis Eyler, Strgar- Roscoe-
Fausch, Inc., consulting engineers, on the Country Club District Traffic Study.
Actions completed include: 1) Options for reconstruction of Browndale Bridge were
identified and explored. 2) At a public meeting with the neighborhood the
options were presented for widening Browndale Bridge. There was little support
for bridge widening. The residents became aware that any option to reduce the
bridge capacity would create traffic impacts on other streets in the
neighborhood. 3) A committee was formed, with representation throughout the
neighborhood, to identify issues and propose and evaluate solutions to traffic
problems with a goal to develop a list of possible actions that would be accepted
throughout the neighborhood and acceptable to the Council. 4) Problems
identified included: large volumes of through traffic, speeding, poor stop sign
compliance, poorly defined intersection controls at triangular intersections and
pedestrian safety issues. 5) The City collected traffic volume and speed data
and the consultant prepared a traffic flow computer model of the neighborhood to
test the effect of any proposed solutions. 6) At a-second committee meeting
possible solutions were discussed for further refinement by the consultant.
7) Currently, the consultant is refining the alternatives and beginning to run
the computer model to determine the effects. The alternatives consist of options
at Browndale Bridge coupled with traffic control measures in and around the
neighborhood along with measures to improve operations on surrounding arterial
roadways to encourage through- traffic to use those routes.
Engineer Hoffman explained that people travel through the area clearly for travel
time and speed. City streets are signed for 30 mph in Edina and a suggestion was
that if speed limits were raised on through streets, persons may choose not to
drive through neighborhoods. Other suggestions were one -way northbound, one -way
southbound, two -way (one direction at a time) operation with traffic signal, two -
way (one direction at a time) operation with stop sign for southbound traffic,
minor widening of the Browndale Bridge, and closing the bridge to vehicular
traffic.
Intersections where additional traffic control might be necessary:
1. Triangular intersections with Wooddale /Country Club Road of
particular concern
2. Browndale- Edgebrook Place north intersection
3. Wooddale - Sunnyside area
Negative impacts of solutions:
A. Increased travel time and distance for residents
B. Traffic diversion from one street to the other
C. Enforcement requirements given current resources
D. Emergency vehicle response times
E. Set negative precedent for future neighborhood dealings
F. Cost
Considered alternatives:
1. Closing three northern connecting streets - 1) Browndale between 44th
and Sunnyside, 2) Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside and 3)
Sunnyside between Arden and Grimes
2. Selected one -way roadways - 1) Browndale between-44th and Sunnyside --
one way northbound, 2) Wooddale between 44th and Sunnyside - -one way
northbound, 3) Browndale Bridge - -one way southbound
3. Restrict left -turns - Ban all left turns into the neighborhood during
peak hours, 2) Revise eastbound left turn signal at 50th and Wooddale
to allow turns on arrow only.
4. Increase number of stops for all possible route combinations through
neighborhoods to increase travel times and to be closer to those on
arterial roadways.
Engineer Hoffman told that the committee would be meeting again on June 15, and
that the complete study would be before Council on July 6, 1993. Residents of
the area will receive information about the Council meeting and an update of the
study.
Ray Schipani, 4517 Wooddale, said neighbors have felt there is a lot of traffic
in the area and the data says there should be 8,000 vehicle trips per day where
actually there are 24,000.
CITY POLICY ON SEWER CONNECTION AFFIRMED FOR DALQUIST ADDITION Engineer Hoffman
recalled that with the approval of the Dalquist addition, four new lots were
created to access the existing sanitary sewer crossing over the existing Dalquist
property. The new plat required a new road, new watermain, storm sewer and
relocating a portion of the sanitary sewer which costs are borne by the
developer. The City had not assessed the property for any sanitary sewer when
constructed 20 years ago. The property was owned by Ruth Schaefer at the time.
All others in the area paid an assessment of $1,838.57 per lot for sanitary
sewer. City policy is to charge the cost of the assessment plus five percent
interest on the assessment to the date of hook -up. This is standard for any
location throughout the City.
In the Dalquist addition four new lots hook up to the sewer line and therefore
need to pay the principal of $7,354.28 for four hook -ups, plus interest at five
percent until the date of hook -up. This would result in an estimated sewer hook-
up charge of $19,000.00 for the four lots as the interest has accrued over the 20
years since the original assessment.
Mark Dalquist, has submitted two letters dated March 12 and April 23, 1993,
indicating that he feels the price is too high in light of the fact that Ruth
Schaefer gave the City an easement to cross the property which resulted in less
construction cost. Both Mr. Dalquist and staff have research the Council minutes
and project documents and there is no clear indication as to what final
disposition should be in this matter. Staff would follow normal procedure and
policy unless directly differently by the Council. Engineer Hoffman noted that
Mr. Dalquist had been at the meeting earlier but had already left.
Member Smith made a motion to reaffirm City policy that connection charges on
sanitary serer or water hook -ups continue to be the cost of the assessment plus
interest on the assessment cost from date of assessment to date of sewer and
water connection. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON EDINA SENIOR CENTER Park and Recreation Director Kojetin said
that at a past Council meeting the question of the relationship of the programs
that are that are being held.at the Senior Center with those of the Community
Center was raised. Director Kojetin submitted a report of cooperative
programming at the Edina Senior Center and Edina Community Education. He
concluded that the relationship between the Senior Center and Community Education
is cooperative rather than competitive. The mutual respect has enabled both
facilities to provide a comprehensive array of programs and classes to best serve
Edina's senior population. No formal action was taken.
VACANCY ON COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor Richards reminded
Council Members that a vacancy for a provider exists on the Community Health
Services Advisory Committee and requested that Council to submit names of
interested persons willing to serve on the Committee.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING FIRE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT AND FIRE EDUCATION
DISPIAY JOINT SERVICES AGREElSENT Motion of Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a member of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association;
WHEREAS, the Association has purchased a fire education display in the form of a
small house on a movable trailer ( "the display");
WHEREAS, additional insurance is not required if the display is owned by one of
the members rather than by the Association; and
WHEREAS, an agreement providing for the ownership, use, scheduling, maintenance,
and storage of the display is in the best interests of all Association members.
NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, that the Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint Services Agreement for
Use of Fire. Education Display, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved
and that the proper City officials are directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of the City as a participating member of the Association.
Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes.
*LABOR CONTRACT FOR 1993 LOCAL 49 OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS REPRESENTING PUBLIC
WORKS -AND PARK MAINTENANCE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve the Labor Contract for 1993 between the City and Local 49
of the Operating Engineers as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*1993 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS (IAFF) #1275 CONTRACT APPROVED
Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to authorize
execution of the 1993 contract with the International Association of Firefighters
Local #1275 as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED: HEARING DATE OF 6/21/93 SET FOR SANITARY SEWER ON
POST LANE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for
adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
SANITARY SEWER IMPR0VE1ENT SS -383
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said
report is hereby approved and directed. to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Nonday. June 21, 1993, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not
less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all
affected properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
POST LANE
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -383
The Edina city Council will meet at the.Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 21,
1993, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvement to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The
approximate cost of said improvement is estimated as set forth below:
Estimated Cost
SANITARY SEWER INg80VEMENT NO. SS -383 $ 18,913.71
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvements includes:
Lots B and C, A.K.A. Parts of Lots 4, 5,' and 6, Block 2, Naas Lake Side Addition,
These properties are proposed to be assessed at $9,456.86 per lot.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
COBB LETTER REGARDING DOG ORDINANCE DISCUSSED In reference to a letter dated
May 11, 1993 from Irving Cobb, 5817 Ewing Avenue South, expressing concern with a
Rottweiler dog chained in his neighbor's yard, Chief Bernhjelm said Jeff Elasky,
Animal Control Officer, has - spoken with Mr. Cobb, the dog owner and other
neighbor regarding this situation. The dog owner was cooperative and sensitive
to the concerns of Mr. Cobb and the dog is currently undergoing obedience
training and is being kept indoors unless attended by the owner. The other
neighbor had no problem with the dog and no other complaints have been received.
Chief Bernhjelm concluded that at this time there appears to be no basis to
proceed under the dangerous dog provisions of the City Code.
*CL&M PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated June 3, 1993, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $211,529.74; CDBG
$5,206.00; Cable $754.59;'Working Capital $673.24; Art Center $12,819.07; Pool
$6,848.70; Golf Coarse $40,930.29; Arena $9,421.53; Gum Range $1,298.01;
Edinboroagh /Centennial Lakes $30,057.61; Utilities $279,572.57; Storm Sever
$1,095.32; Recycling $120.56; Liquor Dispensary $31,572.27; Construction Fund
$5,610.95; TOTAL $63.7,510.45.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 10:14 P.M.
City Clerk
4'QRv,
e`' 1A C.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Agenda Item #
Li.A-
From:
Mayor & City Council
Consent
❑
Francis Hoffman,/
City Engineer !
Information Only
❑
Date:
21 June, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
KI
To Council
public Hearing
Sanitary Sewer
Action
0
Motion
Improvement SS -383
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Approve Improvement project Sanitary Sewer No. 383 to serve
properties on the east side of Post Lane.
Info /Background:
Property owner on the east side of Post Lane has realigned the
property, thus creating new lots needing sanitary sewer service.
The owner has petitioned for the project. Attached is the public
hearing notice, petition, and location map for the project.
Staff recommends approval of project Sanitary Sewer No. 383.
es
�o
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CiLy of Edina
POST LANE - SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -383
SANITARY SEWER
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 21,
1993 at 7:00 PM, to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvement is estimated as set forth below:
POST LANE - East Side
ESTIMATED COST
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -383 $ 18,913.71
The proposed project is proposed to be build in 1993.
The project is a sanitary sewer extension. The special assessment for each
lot is estimated to be $9,456.85.
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvement includes: Lots B and C, a.k.a. Parts of Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block
2, Naas Lake Side Addition.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership
is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be bene-
fited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire ad-
ditional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 AM and 4:30
PM, Monday through Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the
close of the hearing.
Thank you.
Francis J. offi�an, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH /clf
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 937 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927-5461
❑ SIDEWALK
❑ STORM SEWER
❑ ALLEY PAVING
19 SANITARY SEWER
❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STREET LIGHTING
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER:
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above
to the locations listed below.
,",4j
6300 P 0,S T 1_14A f between 13L 0 C r ,? ,( -e and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between VAS 1_07,5 6 1J" and
ADDRESS ADDRESS
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
SIGNATURE
This petition was circulated by:
OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
(PRINTED) PHONE
151oB,6f T L. /!/. -F 2511r_72_ 9G
k NAME ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.
SEPTEMBER 1880
SURVEY FOR: ROBERT L. NAAS
PROPOSED LOT SPLIT
\ 16�< (o / �r
C. S. A. H . N 0. ,� 6 2
r
i p
I =2523'52' % O�y�
L - 232.96 O y�
���•. "'- L- 236.25 h -'
7720.10 a� �- '
O LC- 234.32 J a lP c^�
.s CB-N 61'46'03' E 4 / VV �• UN <.,
?P, 21.631 50. FT. `6 O
10
f)
.Q ~ �I , \ _ •
/a1
O y Sn F`
O� "5a6 /?'= -LINE / "A„ �0 5
PARCEL
/ 18,196 FT. Z
1'0 v U
/.4v
� ' r of
NEW SANITARI(�
SEWER SERVICES o��� ��" `� - == PARCEL A''
17,336 SO. FT. O
W m O
p 15.436 50. FT.
v 2r
_: 3EARi`GS SHOWN ARE ASSUM._
DENZ IRON PROP E4 l CORN ?. <,
7 /
�+ DENO'L CAST IRON MONUMEN 1
/ C
- =R7 CET?F r r THAT TN!S SURD PLAN -v
=GRT v' 5 PREPARCD B Y M= OR UNDE ��j
C!R-L^7 SUFERVISION AND iriAT I AM A I =62'30'00'
RCGISTFRE, L V;—D SURVEYOR UNDcn R =108.08
\ \ ' A'S G= Tr,L STATE Or MINNESGT,: L =117.90 As.43•
-1�J L e-lk �1iC,ia
T 65.58
LC-1l.;.14
CB -N 571 ,!N
3; K 90 i•v..
R :G 137S' —
C. E. COULTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. SCALE: '' o
JOB NO. 11,350A
PROFESSIONAL REGISTERED SURVEYORS BK./PG.910/124
REG. IN MINN., WISC. & IOWA FILE NO. 3- 5- 16Cr,.
-.;. BOX 8901,
WM A .QC_5. MINNESOTA 55408 -090C
T _Eph;,N: 612- 824 -0370
i Al_ 6'.2- 953 -3074 SHEET 5 or 5
E_
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works ✓�
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 21 June, 1993
AGENDA ITEM Iy . a
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Re -Roof Portion of Public Works Building
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. M & S Roofing, Inc. 1. $ 113,940.00
2. B & B Sheetmetal & Roofing 2. $ 121,400.00
3. Commercial Roofing 3. $ 121,600.00
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
M & S Roofing, Inc. $ 113,94.0.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is to re -roof the south half of the Public Works Building.
We have been reserving funds in the capital plan for re- roofing.
Too many leaks are occurring on the south half to wait for full
funding in two years. Thus, the project will be split into this
year and then 1995 for the second half.
Public Works
i -
Signature.
The Recommended bid is ----
within budget not
Kenneth Roslandd
allin, Finance Director
Manager
aa.
u . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE June 18, 1993
AGENDA ITEM IV. B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: maintenance Contract for Vote Tabulators
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
I 1. Business Records Corporation $9,430.00
2. (sole provider)
2'.
3. 3.
.4• 4.
5.. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Business Records Corporation
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The current maintenance contract for the City's vote tabulators
and prom packs is up for renewal as of 7/1/93. This is a two year
contract thru 6 /30/95 and covers on -site maintenance and repair.
Service under this contract has been excellent and ensures that
the election process will go smoothly. There is no increase in
contract price from two years ago.
Funding: 1/2 to be paid'from 1993 Election Budget
1/2 billed to Edina School District
(This is a continuation. of past policy on shared contract costs.)
1;�7d ` ?�, Administration
Signature De
The Recommended bid is
Within budget not within budget ohs Wallin / Inane Director
Kenneth Rosland City
9S. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: _ Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: 21 Tune, 1993 AGENDA ITEM IV. C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Emergency Well Repair - Well 411
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Layne Minnesota Company $ 8,675.00
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Layne Minnesota Company $ 8,675.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for the emergency repair of Well 411 which had a break in
the pump. This repair needed immediate attention as it is a
primary well for the City. This repair is funded from the Utility
Fund.
Public Works - Utilities
S gn u
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withigdbuode
K
allin, Finance Director
Rosland. (My Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engine
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 21 June, 1993
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
1 Change Order 5
2.
3.
4.
5.
AGENDA ITEM Iv. D.
Change Order 5 - Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc.
Amount of Quote or &d
1. $ 22,108.41
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Change Order 5
$ 22,108.41
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The City Policy requires any change order which causes the total
contract to exceed an additional ten percent limit be brought
before Council for approval separate from normal finance approval.
See attached memorandum.
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Public Works - Engineering
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
Director
CITY OF EDINA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 21, 1993
TO: Mayor.& City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Change Order. No. 5
Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc
The City has a prime contractor doing the Normandale Golf Course project, Glenn
Rehbein Excavating. -Inc. In the fall of 1992, the City bid a separate project to
construct a new driveway into the course from Parklawn Avenue. The bids for the
driveway were rejected at low bid of $17,749.00, compared to an estimate of
$90,443.50.
The golf course prime contractor was requested to provide unit price estimates for
some of the driveway work. The prices were acceptable and have been used as
needed to continue work on the course and driveway.
However, by adding additional work of the driveway to the contractor base contract,
the change orders are now totaling to exceed ten percent of the contract. Thus,
separate approval is required for Change Order 5. All change orders, including
Change Order 5, now bring the total cost to 11.8% over the base. contract.
Staff recommends approval of .Change Order 5 which included the paving for the
driveway entrance to the parking lot for the new course.
eii. )C) �a
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Work���'
VIA : - - Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 21 June, 1993
AGENDA ITEM IV. E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sewer Service
for Two Lots of Post
Lane - SS -383
Company
Amount of Quote or &d
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.
$
14,940.00
2 G.L. . Contracting, Inca
2
$
21,077.00
3 W.B. Miller, Inc.
3.
$
26,287.50
j 4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.
$.14,940.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the quote for the installation of sanitary sewer for the
two lots on Post Lane. This improvement will be funded thru
special.assessment.
Si natu 4
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Public Works - Engineering
Department 0 1
Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland, C* Manager
1
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 21, 1993
AGENDA ITEM V.A.
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Virginia Shaw and Mike Lewis -
Co- Chairs of the Sexually- Oriented Business Committee
SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT
On behalf of the Sexually- Oriented Business Committee, we are pleased to submit our
findings and recommendations concerning the regulation of sexually- oriented businesses
in Edina. Our Committee comprised fourteen residents of the community. Our Committee
had equal numbers of men and women and represented a broad age range. We therefore
believe the members of the Committee reflected a reasonably representative viewpoint of
our Community. We are pleased to report that attendance at our meetings was excellent
and alit Committee members participated in our process.
The Committee's assignment, as articulated by Mayor Richards, was to determine if the
presence of sexually- oriented businesses leads to potentially adverse secondary effects such
as crime, diminution of property values, and the loss of a nurturing environment for
children. If a linkage was found to exist, the Committee was directed to offer findings for
consideration by the City Council concerning the regulation of such businesses. In addition
to making such findings, the Committee also elected to prepare a draft of an ordinance for
the Council's consideration. This draft presents the Committee's recommendations as to
how sexually- oriented businesses should be regulated in Edina.
Process:
The Committee met on five occasions since April 20, 1993. At all meetings, members of
the City staff were present as well as the City's legal counsel. The Committee pursued its
assignment as follows:
1. Reviewed studies of other cities with respect to the secondary effects of
sexually- oriented businesses.
2. Reviewed ordinances from other cities regulating sexually- oriented
businesses.
I Reviewed court cases with respect to the challenges of ordinances in other
cities.
4. Obtained advice from the City's legal counsel and staff.
5. Considered and adopted findings concerning the relationship between
sexually- oriented businesses and adverse secondary effects.
FINAL REPORT /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
JUNE 2111993
Page two
6. Considered alternatives for the regulation of sexually- oriented businesses.
7. Selected the preferred alternative for regulation.
Findings:
The Committee adopted the following findings as to the relationship between sexually -
oriented businesses and adverse secondary effects. The Committee recommends the City
Council adopt these findings.
IaO.W:1ui:10
On March 15, 1993, the City Council established the Study Committee on Sexually
Oriented Businesses (the "Study Committee "). The Study Committee has reviewed studies
and ordinances of other cities as well as court decisions with respect to litigation involving
the ordinances of other cities. Members of the Study Committee also visited businesses in
Edina and other cities to familiarize themselves with merchandise and services that could
be described as sexually oriented by nature. After reviewing and deliberating on the
aforementioned studies, ordinances, court cases, and site visits, and being fully advised by
the City of Edina staff and City Attorneys, the Study Committee hereby makes the
following
FINDINGS
Sexually- oriented businesses have adverse secondary characteristics particularly when they
may be accessible to minors or are located near residential properties or schools, day care
centers, libraries and parks, and such businesses can exert a dehumanizing influence on
persons attending or using such residential properties, schools, day -care centers, libraries
and parks.
Sexually- oriented businesses can contribute to an increase in criminal activity in the area
in which such businesses are located, taxing city crime - prevention programs and law -
enforcement services.
Sexually- oriented businesses can significantly contribute to the deterioration of residential
neighborhoods and can impair the character and quality of the residential housing in the
area in which such businesses are located.
The concentration of sexually- oriented businesses can have a substantially detrimental
effect on the area in which such businesses are concentrated and on the overall quality of
urban life. A cycle of decay can result from the influx and concentration of sexually -
oriented businesses. The presence of such businesses is perceived by others as an
FINAL REPORT /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
JUNE 21, 1993
Page three
indication that the area is deteriorating and the result can be devastating -- other
businesses move out of the vicinity and residents flee from the area. Declining real estate
values, which can result from the concentration of such businesses, erode the City's tax
base and contribute to overall urban blight.
The adoption of ordinances regulating the location and operation of sexually oriented
businesses is warranted to prevent the adverse secondary effects of such businesses on
Edina's crime rate, its retail trade, its property values, and in general the quality of Edina's
neighborhoods, commercial and industrial districts, and urban life.
Ordinance Issues:
The Committee debated several issues relative to the regulation of sexually- oriented
businesses. Among these issues were:
1. The licensing of sexually- oriented businesses.
2. The distance between sexually- oriented businesses and uses which 'could be
impacted by adverse secondary effects.
3. The distinction between principal businesses and accessory businesses.
4. Methods to distinguish sexually- oriented businesses from businesses not subject to
regulation.
S. The eligibility for licenses for sexually- oriented businesses.
6. The restrictions and regulations concerning the operation of sexually- oriented
businesses.
We would recommend that the Council review the minutes of our meetings to obtain a
better understanding of the discussions held on these issues.
Recommended Ordinance:
The Committee reached a consensus recommendation with respect to an ordinance the City
should consider for the regulation of sexually- oriented businesses. The proposed ordinance
amends the City's Zoning Ordinance to restrict sexually- oriented businesses to the PC -3
Commercial District. The Ordinance also provides that no sexually- oriented business can
be located within 500 feet of any other sexually- oriented business or licensed day -care
facility or properties within residential zoning districts including the R -1, R -2, PRD, PSR,
or MDD Zoning Districts. The proposed Ordinance also provides for a licensing mechanism
for persons wishing to operate a sexually- oriented business. We are hopeful that the
proposed ordinance provides protection from the adverse secondary effects of sexually -
oriented businesses while at the same time preserving the constitutional rights of those
persons wishing to operate such businesses.
MEMBERS /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
JUNE 21, 1993
Page four
Members of the Committee wish to thank the City Council for this opportunity to be of
service to our community. We appreciate your consideration of our recommendations and
stand ready to answer any questions which you may have concerning our findings and
recommendations.
Attachments:
- Charge to the Committee
- Minutes of Meetings
- Correspondence from City Attorneys and City Staff
- Recommended Ordinance
- Background Information
cc: Alan Ackerberg
Jim Fee
David Hays
Sydney Johnson
Mike Lewis
John Lonsbury
Helen McClelland
Laura McWethy
Cappy Moore
Janet Nelson
Rob Rydman
Virginia Shaw
Ted Stark
Lois Wilder
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 1993
TO: Study Committee
FROM: Fred Richards
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE CHARGE
The City Council is considering the advisability of enacting ordinances regulating businesses
offering sexually explicit merchandise or entertainment. As you might imagine, the
regulation of such businesses is very complex. Regulations may be closely scrutinized by the
courts to determine if First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and expression are
being violated. As such, any ordinance that may be enacted must walk the fine line of
responding to the interests of our residents while preserving the constitutional rights of
existing or future businesses.
Our City Attorney has advised the Council that an ordinance regulating sexually oriented
businesses may not be enacted for the sole purpose and intent of restricting sexually explicit
speech. Therefore, the absolute prohibition of such businesses in the community may not
be possible. However, the location and manner of conducting sales may be regulated if the
ordinance's intent is to control the adverse secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses
on the community -- e.g. crime, property values, and protection and preservation of a
nurturing environment for children. It is this relationship between such secondary effects
and the presence of sexually oriented businesses that must be demonstrated prior to enacting
an ordinance. The committee's assignment is to determine if such a link exists, and if so,
to offer findings for consideration by the Council in drafting an ordinance. The Committee
need not undertake its own research to establish the relationship between sexually oriented
businesses and their secondary effects. The courts have ruled that the City can rely on the
experiences of other cities who have conducted extensive research.
The Council asks that you complete your work no later than June 1, and present your
findings at the June 7, 1993, City Council meeting. Ken Rosland, our City Manager, has
assigned his assistant, Gordon Hughes, to serve as your staff. You will also be assisted by
our City Attorneys, Jerry Gilligan, of Dorsey & Whitney and Marsh Hallberg of Thomsen
Nybeck. Thanks again for your willingness to serve on this important committee.
MINUTES
OF THE SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1993
5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: MIKE LEWIS - CO -CHAIR
VIRGINIA SHAW - CO -CHAIR
ROB RYDMAN
DAVID HAYS
ALAN ACKERBERG
JOHN LONSBURY
HELEN MCCLELLAND
LAURA MCWETHY
TED STARK
CAPPY MOORS
LOIS WILDER
JANET NELSON
SYDNEY JOHNSON
MEMBERS ABSENT: AMY JOHNSON
JIM FEE
OTHERS PRESENT: MAYOR FRED RICHARDS
GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
JERRY GILLIGAN, CITY ATTORNEY
MARSH HALBERG, CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Lewis called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. at the Edina City Hall Council
Chambers. Mr. Lewis introduced Mayor Fred Richards who reviewed the Council's Charge
to the Committee as contained in his memo of April 5, 1993. Mayor Richards thanked the
members of the Committee for their willingness to serve in this important capacity. The
Mayor urged each individual Committee member to speak his or her views concerning the
topic of sexually- oriented businesses, even if those views are contrary to the views of other
members of the Committee. The Mayor explained that the Council which ultimately would
be responsible for enacting an ordinance, if warranted, would rely heavily upon the
recommendations and findings of the Committee. He also explained that the City Staff and
City Attorneys were at the disposal of the Committee and that if additional staff expertise
was required, the City Manager was prepared to assign other individuals to assist the
Committee. Mayor Richards closed by requesting that if any segment of the City's residents
were not represented on the Committee, he would arrange for other individuals to be
appointed so as to provide the best cross- sectional representation possible. Mayor Richards
Minutes /Sexually - Oriented Business Committee
April 20, 1993
Page two
thanked the members of the Committee for their service and excused himself from the
meeting.
Mr. Lewis called upon Mr. Gilligan and Mr. Halberg to brief the Committee on legal issues
with respect to sexually- oriented businesses. Mr. Gilligan reviewed with the Committee
his memo of March 12, 1993. He explained that any ordinance that the City may adopt
will be closely scrutinized with respect to First Amendment rights. He explained that most
sexually- oriented businesses are regulated in other cities through zoning restrictions and/or
licensing requirements. Mr. Gilligan explained that such restrictions have been upheld if
their intent is to control the adverse effects associated with sexually- oriented businesses.
Mr. Gilligan noted that the City must demonstrate a link between the presence of such
businesses and the interests that the City is seeking to protect. Those interests could
include the prevention of crime, the protection of the City's retail trade, the maintenance
of property values and the preservation of the quality of the City's neighborhoods and
commercial districts.
Mr. Halberg briefed the Committee on criminal issues with respect to pornography and
obscenity. He identified those circumstances which he and other attorneys in Hennepin
County have or would proceed to prosecute. He also urged members of the Committee to
individually visit establishments which are or could be classified as sexually- oriented
businesses in order to get a better understanding of the products which are sold and the
method in which sales are conducted.
Mr. Ackerberg expressed concern that a sexually- oriented business ordinance in the City
may inadvertently serve as a blueprint for individuals who wish to locate such a business
in the City. Mr. Gilligan commented that this could be a risk of the ordinance, however,
under the present provisions of the City Code, it would now be very difficult for the City
to prevent the establishment of adult uses in the City's commercial district. Mr. Halberg
commented that he was convinced it was not a questions of, "IF" such businesses would
locate in the City, but rather "WHEN" such business would locate within the City.
Therefore, he felt the City was well advised to proceed with Ordinances even in light of the
risk that Mr. Ackerberg correctly identified.
Mr. Lonsbury inquired if nude dancing could be a subject of regulation. Mr. Gilligan and
Mr. Halberg answered affirmatively. , Mrs._ McClelland inquired if the regulation of
prostitution would be included. Mr. Halberg commented that adequate statutes existed
with respect to prostitution and therefore no further ordinances were necessary in this
regard.
Minutes /Sexually- Oriented Business Committee
April 20, 1993
Page three
Mr. Hughes had previously distributed an information packet to all Committee members.
The information packet included studies concerning sexually - oriented businesses from other
cities, ordinances of other cities and court decisions with respect to sexually- oriented
businesses in other cities. The staff briefly explained the contents of the information
package and identified those studies, ordinances and court cases that were most relevant
to Edina's situation. The committee generally discussed certain elements of the information
package.
Mr. Hughes distributed a preliminary agenda for Committee meetings. It was agreed that
the Committee would meet again at 5:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 4, 1993, in the City Hall
Council Chambers for the purpose of discussing the information packet and considering
draft findings that would be prepared by staff for the Committee's consideration.
Additional meetings were tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, May 11; Tuesday, May 25;
and Tuesday, June 1, at 5:00 P.M.
There being no further business, Mrs. Shaw and Mr. Lewis adjourned the meeting at 6:00
P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City Manager
GLH /dr
-MINUTES
OF THE SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
TUESDAY, MAY 4, 1993
5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL MANAGERS CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: MIKE LEWIS - CO -CHAIR
VIRGINIA SHAW - CO -CHAIR
DAVID HAYS
TED STARK
ROB RYDMAN
SYDNEY JOHNSON
JOHN LONSBURY
CAPPY MOORE
LOIS WILDER
ALAN ACKERBERG
JANET NELSON
LOIS MCWETHY
JIM FEE
MEMBERS ABSENT: AMY JOHNSON
HELEN MCCLELLAND
OTHERS PRESENT: GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
JERRY GILLIGAN, CITY ATTORNEY
MARSH HALBERG, CITY ATTORNEY
Mrs. Shaw called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Conference Room of Edina City
Hall. She advised that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the information packet
that had been distributed at the April 20, 1993, Committee meeting. She noted that the
information packet included studies conducted by other cities, ordinances of other cities,
and court cases involving ordinances regulating sexually- oriented businesses. Mrs. Shaw
also referred to Draft Findings that have been prepared by the staff for the Committee's
consideration.
Mrs. Shaw called upon the staff to make a presentation concerning the information packet.
Mr. Halberg briefed the Committee with respect to the criminal statutes regulating sexually -
oriented businesses and activities in Minnesota. He provided a summary of the statutes
relating to prostitution, solicitation, disorderly house, fornication, indecent exposure,
obscene materials, indecent literature, use of minors in sexual performances, possession of
pictorial representations of minors, mailing of obscene matter, sexually explicit material,
dissemination and display of harmful materials to minors, exhibition of materials, penalties
and public nuisance aspects of sexually- oriented activities. Mr. Halberg also reviewed with
the Committee, three cases in the City of Edina involving sexually- oriented activities. He
described, in particular, the de- humanizing aspects of several of the individuals who had
Minutes /Sexually- Oriented Business Committee
May 6, 1993
Page two
participated in such activities.
Mr. Lewis described to the Committee a video of an interview with Ted Bundy, in which
he described the influence of pornography on his life of crime. Mrs. McWethy noted that
several of the studies contained in the information packet established a correlation between
sexually- oriented businesses and the prevalence of criminal activity.
Mr. Ackerberg questioned the applicability of the study from the St. Paul on the basis of
relatively low property values in the study area compared to high property values in Edina.
He inquired as to the characteristics of Edina, which apparently have discouraged or
prevented the establishment of sexually- oriented businesses within the City. The
Committee discussed, in general, those characteristics of Edina that may discourage
sexually- oriented businesses. Among the characteristics discussed were the lack of on -sale
liquor licenses, high property values of commercial areas, the perception that Edina may
have ordinances preventing such uses today, the fact that many commercial properties are
owned or managed by residents of the community and in general, the lack of attendant
factors that would contribute to such uses. Mr. Lewis noted that an establishment called
Fantasy House was located within the City of St. Louis Park. In his opinion, such a
enterprise could just as easily have been located within Edina.
Mr. Hughes presented draft Findings for the Committee's consideration. Mr. Ackerberg
recommended that the last paragraph of the Findings include a reference to industrial
districts as well as commercial districts. He also questioned the third paragraph of the
Findings, which referenced the shortage of affordable and habitable housing in the City.
The Committee generally agreed to delete a portion of the third paragraph relating to
affordable and habitable housing. Mr. Lonsbury questioned the first paragraph of the
Findings which referred to the, "dehumanizing influence ", of individuals associated with
sexually- oriented businesses. Mr. Halberg commented to the Committee, that based upon
his experience with certain cases in Edina, participants in certain pornographic activity
indeed were dehumanized by their participation. Mr. Lonsbury recommended modifications
to the language of the first paragraph which was generally agreed to by the Committee.
Following further discussion, Mr. Lonsbury moved adoption of the following Findings:
Preamble
On March 15, 1993, the City Council established the Study Committee on Sexually
Oriented Businesses (the "Study Committee "). The Study Committee has reviewed studies
and ordinances of other cities as well as court decisions with respect to litigation involving
the ordinances of other cities. Members of the Study Committee also visited businesses in
Edina and other cities to familiarize themselves with merchandise and services that could
be described as sexually oriented by nature. After reviewing and deliberating on the
IL
Minutes /Sexually- Oriented Businesses
May 6, 1993
Page three
aforementioned studies, ordinances, court cases, and site visits, and being fully advised by
the City of Edina staff and City Attorneys, the Study Committee hereby makes the
following
FINDINGS
Sexually - oriented businesses have adverse secondary characteristics particularly when they
may be accessible to minors or are located near residential properties or schools, day care
centers, libraries and parks, and such businesses can exert a dehumanizing influence on
persons attending or using such residential properties, schools, day -care centers, libraries
and parks.
Sexually- oriented businesses can contribute to an increase in criminal activity in the area
in which such businesses are located, taxing city crime- prevention programs and law -
enforcement services.
Sexually- oriented businesses can significantly contribute to the deterioration of residential
neighborhoods and can impair the character and quality of the residential housing in the
area in which such businesses are located.
The concentration of sexually- oriented businesses can have a substantially detrimental
effect on the area in which such businesses are concentrated and on the overall quality of
urban life. A cycle of decay can result from the influx and concentration of sexually -
oriented businesses. The presence of such businesses is perceived by others as an
indication that the area is deteriorating and the result can be devastating -- other
businesses move out of the vicinity and residents flee from the area. Declining real estate
values, which can result from the concentration of such businesses, erode the City's tax
base and contribute to overall urban blight.
The adoption of ordinances regulating the location and operation of sexually oriented
businesses is warranted to prevent the adverse secondary effects of such businesses on
Edina's crime rate, its retail trade, its property values, and in general the quality of Edina's
neighborhoods, commercial and industrial districts, and urban life.
Mrs. Wilder seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Mrs. Shaw reminded the Committee that the next meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, May
11, 1993, at 5:00 P.M. Mr. Hughes commented that he would mail a draft ordinance for
the Committee's consideration at that meeting.
jo
Minutes /Sexually- Oriented Businesses
May 6, 1993
Page four
There being no further business, Mrs. Shaw and Mr. Lewis adjourned the meeting at 6:10
P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City Manager
GLH /dr
MINUTES
OF THE SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
TUESDAY - MAY 11, 1993
5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: MIKE LEWIS - CO -CHAIR
VIRGINIA SHAW - CO -CHAIR
DAVID HAYS
TED STARK
ROB RYDMAN
SYDNEY JOHNSON
JOHN LONSBURY
CAPPY MOORE
LOIS WILDER
ALAN ACKERBERG
JANET NELSON
LOIS MCWETHY
JIM FEE
HELEN MCCLELLAND
MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE
OTHERS PRESENT: GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
CRAIG LARSEN, CITY PLANNER
JERRY GILLIGAN, CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Lewis called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of Edina City
Hall. Mr. Hays moved approval of the Minutes of the May 4, 1993, meeting. Ms. Johnson
seconded the motion. All voted Aye. Motion carried.
Mr. Lewis advised that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the draft ordinance that
had been distributed to the committee by the staff. He asked Mr. Hughes to provide an
overview of the draft ordinance. Mr. Hughes advised that the draft ordinance was in the
form of an amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance and an amendment to the City's
Ordinance with respect to crimes and forbidden conduct. With respect to the Zoning
Ordinance amendment, Mr. Hughes referred to the definitions provided, in particular the
definition of sexually- oriented business principal and sexually- oriented business accessory.
He explained that the draft ordinance proposes that sexually- oriented businesses be limited
to Planned Commercial District -3. However, he noted that the Committee could consider
other zoning districts instead of or in addition to the PCD -3 District. Mr. Hughes used a
zoning map to illustrate those portions of the City which are zoned commercial and
industrial.
Mr. Hughes also explained that many ordinances require a minimum spacing between
MINUTES /SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
May 11, 1993
Page two
sexually- oriented businesses and other uses such as residential properties, churches, parks
and day care centers. He noted that such a provision had been provided in the draft
ordinance but that the exact spacing should be discussed by the committee. He also noted
that the draft includes an amendment to the City's ordinance concerning crime and
forbidden conduct. This amendment prohibits a person under the age of 18 from entering
a sexually- oriented business. Mr. Hughes concluded by noting the draft ordinance does not
include a licensing provision. He explained that the City typically does not issue business
licenses, except for food establishments, tobacco sales and liquor. Mr. Gilligan commented
that a licensing provision may be of little value, in that it would be difficult to deny a
license based upon the applicant's background. He noted, however, that a license could
potentially be revoked for non - compliance with Ordinance requirements. Such a revocation
feature may add to the remedies available to the City to control a sexually- oriented
business that failed to comply with ordinance requirements.
Mr. Lewis called upon members of the Committee for their comments concerning the draft
ordinance. • Mr. Lonsbury stated that the spacing requirement from establishments which
sell beer, wine or liquor may not be appropriate for Edina, in that Edina does not provide
traditional liquor licenses. He also expressed concern that the ordinance did not provide
standards with respect to signage of sexually- oriented businesses. Mr. Hughes and Mr.
Larsen briefly explained the requirements of the City's sign ordinance and how they may
apply to sexually- oriented businesses. Mr. Gilligan commented that it may be difficult,
from a constitutional standpoint, to regulate the message contained in the sign. Mr.
Ackerberg also questioned signage for such establishments. He was particularly concerned
about window signs and the possibility of sexually explicit merchandise being displayed in
windows. Mr. Larsen noted that while signs on the exterior of a building are regulated by
the sign ordinance, signs which are visible from the interior of the building, such as from
a mall area, are not regulated. The Committee requested that the staff provide additional
information concerning signage options.
Mrs. McClelland questioned limiting sexually- oriented businesses to the PC -3 District. She
noted that the Industrial District may be more appropriate for such uses. The Committee
thereupon discussed in general the relative merits of limiting sexually- oriented businesses
to the Commercial District versus the Industrial District. Some Committee members noted.
the rent structure of PC -3 properties may provide a certain amount of self - regulation. Mrs.
McClelland inquired if only some portions of the Industrial District, rather than the entire
district, could be made eligible for sexually- oriented businesses. Mr. Gilligan agreed to
research that question for the Committee's consideration at the next meeting.
Mr. Lewis inquired as to the percentage of the City's land area that comprises the PC -3
Commercial District and/or the Planned Industrial District. Mr. Hughes responded that he
did not have that information but it could be provided for the next meeting.
7
MINUTES /SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
May 11, 1993
Page three
The Committee then discussed spacing requirements between sexually- oriented businesses
and other adjoining uses. With the aid of the zoning map, Mr. Hughes displayed the
impact of 500 foot, 1000 foot and 2000 foot spacing requirements. It was shown that the
larger spacing requirements could effectively eliminate the possibility of sexually- oriented
businesses in certain zoning districts. Mr. Gilligan advised the Committee that it was
important that a reasonable percentage of the City remained available for sexually- oriented
businesses. He noted that in the case of Renton vs. Playtime Theaters, five percent of the
City was left available for sexually- oriented businesses and the Court determined that this
was a reasonable percentage. Mrs. McClelland stated that a spacing requirement of 500
feet seemed too small and 1000 feet seemed too large. She believed that a spacing
requirement of 750 feet may be a reasonable compromise. Following discussion, the
Committee requested that Mr. Hughes provide an analysis for the next meeting, as to the
areas that would be available for sexually- oriented businesses after imposing various
spacing requirements.
Mrs. Nelson stated that she strongly believed a spacing requirement should be provided
from establishments licensed to sell beer, wine and liquor. She cited evidence from studies
that the committee had reviewed as to the correlation between liquor establishments,
sexually- oriented businesses and adverse secondary effects.
Mr. Ackerberg stated his opinion that the PC -3 Commercial District was the most
appropriate zoning district for sexually- oriented businesses. He reiterated his concern with
respect to signage and sexually- explicit material visible from the exterior of the business
and hoped that mechanisms could be provided that would regulate such signage and
displays. Mr. Fee also agreed that the most appropriate location in the City was the PC -3
District.
Mrs. McClelland advocated that the City adopt a licensing procedure in that it provides one
additional control that could be exercised for the regulation of sexually- oriented businesses.
The Committee discussed the pros and cons of such a licensing provision. Mr. Gilligan
agreed to supply additional information concerning licensing.
There being no further business, Mr. Lewis adjourned the meeting at 6:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City Manager
GLH /dr
MINUTES
OF THE SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
TUESDAY - MAY 25, 1993
5:00 p.m.
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: MIKE LEWIS - CO -CHAIR
VIRGINIA SHAW - CO -CHAIR
ROB RYDMAN
LAURA MCWETHY
JOHN LONSBURY
SYDNEY JOHNSON
JANET NELSON
JIM FEE
HELEN MCCLELLAND
CAPPY MOORE
LOIS WILDER
ALAN ACKERBERG
MEMBERS ABSENT., DAVID HAYS
TED STARK
OTHERS PRESENT: GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
CRAIG LARSEN, CITY PLANNER
JERRY GILLIGAN, CITY ATTORNEY
MARSH HALBERG, CITY ATTORNEY
Mrs. Shaw called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the conference room of Edina City
Hall. Ms. Moore moved approval of the Minutes of the May 11, 1993, meeting. Ms.
Nelson seconded the motion. All voted Aye. Motion carried.
Mrs. Shaw advised the Committee that six items required discussion at the meeting. These
items included:
1) the advisability of requiring licensing of such businesses
2) whether or not some, but not all, of a certain zoning district could be designated for
sexually- oriented businesses
3) the percentage of the City that would be available to sexually- oriented businesses
if the draft ordinance were adopted
4) signage and display requirements
5) the spacing requirement from various uses which the City desired to protect from
sexually - oriented businesses
6) the distinction between accessory uses and principal uses
LICENSING:
Mrs. Shaw called upon Mr. Gilligan to provide an overview of the legal issues with respect
to licensing. Mr. Gilligan summarized his memorandum of March 21, 1993, concerning
the licensing issue. He advised that while licensing may provide an additional tool for
regulation, it also may provide the opportunity for an additional challenge of the
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
May 25, 1993
Page two
constitutionality of the City Ordinances. He reviewed Court decisions with respect to the
licensing requirements imposed by other cities. Mr. Halberg noted that he did not believe
that the licensing provision added additional strength to the regulation of sexually- oriented
businesses by the City. Mrs. McClelland noted that in her view, licensing was important
for two reasons, 1) it provided an opportunity to investigate the owners and operators of
the business and collect a fee to defray the costs of ongoing monitoring and enforcement
efforts, 2) a licensing provision would provide for the opportunity to revoke a license for
non - compliance with Ordinance requirements. Mr. Fee stated his agreement with Mrs.
McClelland's points, noting that a licensing requirement would provide one more
opportunity for the City to regulate such business. Mr. Ackerberg also favored a licensing
provision. Mr. Rydman commented that the value of a licensing provision depended largely
on drafting well - crafted language to withstand a challenge. Mr. Lonsbury expressed a
concern that a licensing provision may appear to load -up local ordinances and therefore
invite a legal challenge. Ms. Moore stated her agreement with the licensing provision,
noting that the collection of fees to defray the cost of investigation and ongoing
enforcement were important. Ms. Nelson stated that she supported the concept of a
license, but agreed with Mr. Lonsbury's concern concerning potential legal challenges. Mr.
Hughes stated that the staff could prepare draft licensing language for ' the Committee's
consideration. After further discussion concerning the advantages and disadvantages of a
licensing provision, Mr. Ackerberg moved that staff be directed to prepare a draft Licensing
Ordinance for the Committee's consideration. Ms. McClelland seconded the motion. All
voted Aye. Motion carried.
PARTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS:
Mr. Gilligan referred to his memo of March 21, 1993, with respect to whether the City
could restrict sexually- oriented businesses to only a portion of a zoning district. Mr.
Gilligan cited provisions of State Law whereby zoning regulations must be uniform for each
zoning district. He therefore advised that a provision limiting sexually- oriented businesses
to only a portion of a particular zoning district would not comply with State Law.
PERCENTAGE OF CITY AVAILABLE FOR SEXUALLY - ORIENTED BUSINESSES:
Mr. Hughes referred to his memorandum of May 18, 1993, with respect to the land areas
in various zoning districts .in the City. He advised that approximately 2.2 percent of the
City is within the C -3 Commercial District. He also noted that when combined with the
C -1 and C -2 Commercial Districts, less than three percent of the City was available for
retail uses in general. Therefore, approximately 80 percent of the retail areas in the City
are within the C -3 District. Mr. Gilligan reviewed with the Committee, Court cases
involving other cities which were directed in part on the availability of land for sexually -
oriented businesses. He noted that while the C -3 District comprises a relatively small
portion of the City as a whole, it is a relatively large portion of the retail district.
Therefore, he felt that limiting sexually- oriented businesses to the C -3 District represented
a reasonable portion of the City. The Committee generally agreed. No other zoning
districts were recommended as being eligible for sexually- oriented businesses.
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
May 25, 1993
Page three
SIGNAGE'AND DISPLAYS:
Mr. Hughes reviewed with the Committee his May 18, 1993, memo dealing with signs and
displays. He briefed the Committee on provisions of the current sign ordinance which
prohibited roof signs, motion signs, portable signs, search lights or beacons and indecent
signs. He advised that the City's sign regulations already included many of the restrictions
that are found in other cities ordinances with respect to sexually - oriented businesses. He
therefore did not believe that additional sign restrictions were necessary for sexually -
oriented businesses. The Committee generally agreed. Mr. Hughes, however,
recommended that the Ordinance should include language with respect to the display of
products and merchandise of sexually- oriented businesses that could be visible from the
exterior of the business. He recommended a provision whereby no merchandise or
activities of the sexually- oriented business could be visible from any point outside of the
business premises. The Committee agreed that such language should be added to the draft
Ordinance.
SETBACK FROM OTHER USES:
Mr. Hughes used a zoning map to illustrate the location of the C -3 Commercial District and
its proximity to residential districts, the mixed development district and other uses which
may deserve protection from the secondary effects of sexually- oriented businesses. He
showed the effects of 500 foot, 750 foot and 1000 foot spacing requirements. Mr. Gilligan
commented that a spacing requirement from businesses licensed to serve beer and wine
may not be appropriate in that it may unduly restrict the amount of the C -3 District that
would be available for sexually- oriented businesses. The Committee discussed the type of
liquor licenses that are now available in the City, noting that hard liquor licenses are not
available but only licenses for the sale of beer or wine in connection with restaurants. The
Committee generally agreed that the type of liquor establishments that were located within
the City did not contribute to the adverse secondary effects that had .been evidenced in
studies from other cities. Ms. McClelland stated that it may be advisable to provide a
spacing requirement from establishments which serve hard liquor, even though such
establishments are not currently eligible for licensing in the community. She noted that
if such licenses were ever available in the future, it may be desirable to provide a setback
requirement for sexually- oriented businesses at this time. After some discussion, Mr.
Gilligan recommended that provisions relative to the sale of hard liquor may be best stated
in the form of a recommendation to the City Council rather than as a provision in the
current ordinance. The Committee generally agreed with this recommendation. The
Committee thereupon discussed the relative merits of a 500 foot setback requirement and
a 750 foot setback requirement. Mrs. Shaw asked the staff for their recommendation. Mr.
Hughes recommended that a 500 foot requirement appeared to offer the protection that
the City required and was consistent with the requirement imposed in other cities'
ordinances. Ms. McClelland and Ms. Nelson stated that in their view a 750 foot
requirement would be more appropriate. After further discussion, Mrs. Shaw asked for a
show of hands with a respect to the Committee's desire concerning setback requirements.
Eight members of the Committee indicated support for a 500 foot requirement. ' Four
members of the Committee indicated support for a 750 foot requirement. Mr. Hughes
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
May 25, 1993
Page four
stated that he would prepare a re -draft of the Ordinance stating a 500 foot requirement
that could then be reviewed at the Committee at their next meeting.
PRINCIPAL USES AND ACCESSORY USES:
Mr. Hughes advised that the draft of the Ordinance distinguish Sexually- Oriented
Businesses Principal and Sexually- Oriented Businesses Accessory. The Ordinance provided
that both Principal and Accessory uses were limited to the C -3 Commercial District.
However, the setback requirements applied only to principal uses. He explained that the
staff was concerned that limiting accessory uses to the C -3 District may be too restrictive.
He cited the example of a book store or art gallery that carries reproductions of
masterpiece paintings may be deemed a sexually- oriented business - accessory under the
provisions of the draft ordinance. They would thereby be restricted to the C -3 Com.:.ercia
District. He also noted that video stores which rent adults only videos, may likewise be
restricted to the C -3 District. Mr. Akerberg inquired as to the distinction between accessory
uses and principal uses. Mr. Hughes responded that it is proposed to be based on a
percentage of the floor area of the business which is devoted to sexually- oriented activities.
The Committee directed staff to research existing businesses in the City which could be
deemed sexually- oriented businesses accessory and prepare a recommendation as to the
distinction between principal uses and accessory uses for the next meeting.
The Committee discussed, briefly, t_:e proposed schedule for completing the Committee's
work and presenting a recommendation to the Council. Mr. Lonsbury noted that he
preferred to have a longer meeting on June 2, 1993, in hopes of completing the
Committee's work. After discussion, the Committee agreed to schedule the June 2, 1993,
Committee meeting for two hours in order to conduct a more complete review of the
Ordinance at that time.
There being no further business, Mrs. Shaw adjourned the meeting at 6:15 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City Manager
GLH /dr
MINUTES
OF THE SEXUALLY - ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
TUESDAY - JUNE 8, 1993
5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: MIKE LEWIS - CO -CHAIR
VIRGINIA SHAW - CO -CHAIR
JOHN LONSBURY
HELEN MCCLELLAND
JIM FEE
SYDNEY JOHNSON
DAVID HAYS
TED STARK
CAPPY MOORE
LAURA MCWETHY
ALAN AKERBERG
MEMBERS ABSENT: ROB RYDMAN
JANET NELSON
LOIS WILDER
OTHERS PRESENT: GORDON HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
CRAIG LARSEN, CITY PLANNER
JERRY GILLIGAN, CITY ATTORNEY
MARSH HALBERG, CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Lewis called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Conference Room of Edina City
Hall. Mrs. McClelland offered a correction to the Minutes of the May 25, 1993, meeting
with respect to the third full sentence on Page 2. Mrs. McClelland's revision was as
follows, "Mrs. McClelland noted that in her view, licensing was important for two reasons,
1) it provided. an opportunity to investigate the owners and operators of the business and
provide an opportunity. to revoke a license for non - compliance with Ordinance
requirements and 2) not to license such establishments would imply or send a message
denoting a lack of concern about the premises, their ownership or their operators. Other
than health regulations for food establishments, all licenses required by the City, including
alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and vending machines reflect the strong concern of the
community that these activities not be accessible or patronized by minors." Mrs.
McClelland moved approval of the May 25, 1993, Minutes, as amended. Mr. Fee seconded
the Motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Mr. Lewis called upon Mr. Hughes to present the revised draft Ordinance, based upon the
direction that he received at the May 25, 1993, meeting. Mr. Hughes explained that the
revised Ordinance was divided into two parts. The first four sections of the proposed
Ordinance dealt with Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Remaining sections of the
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
June 8, 1993
Page two
Amendment provided for a licensing mechanism for sexually- oriented businesses. He
explained that the definition of sexually- oriented business accessory had been eliminated
from the Ordinance. Mr. Hughes explained that the definitions of Adult Book Store and
Adult Motion Picture Rental sales had been revised such that if more than ten percent.of
the-store area or stock in trade of such businesses were devoted to adult uses, such uses
would be considered as sexually- oriented businesses. He also recommended that the ten.
percent threshold be applied to adult novelty establishments and that the definitions be
further revised such that the aggregate percentage of an establishment which carries adult
books, video tapes or novelties, be limited to not more than ten percent.
The Committee thereupon discussed the ten percent threshold as it applied to bookstores,
motion picture rental or novelty establishments. Mrs. Shaw asked the Staff for their
reasoning, with respect to the ten percent restriction. Mr. Hughes commented that most
studies, with respect to the secondary affects of sexually- oriented businesses were based
upon establishments that had a much higher percentage devoted to adult uses. He and Mr.
Gilligan concurred that it may be difficult to establish the relationship between adverse
secondary affects and businesses with less than ten percent of the floor area or stock in
trade devoted to adult uses. Mrs. McClelland expressed concern that ten percent may be
too low and suggested that a higher percentage may be more appropriate.
Mr. Ackerberg inquired if the gross receipts of the establishment should be considered in
addition to the percentage of floor area or stock in trade. The Committee thereupon
discussed, in detail, the merits of imposing a limitation on gross receipts. Mr. Lonsbury
expressed his opinion that the appearance of an establishment was the most important
characteristic that should be measured and that gross receipts were not as good an
indicator of the appearance of this facility as were stock in trade or floor area. Mrs.
McClelland commented that the adverse secondary effects, with respect to sexually oriented
businesses were tied more closely with the appearance of the facility, rather than the
receipts. Mr. Lewis commented that it may be very difficult for the establishment, or the
City to distinguish those receipts derived from adult uses, as opposed to non -adult uses.
Mr. Ackerberg stated that limiting gross receipts was one more method that could be used
by the City to regulate sexually- oriented businesses. After further discussion, Mrs. Shaw
moved that the Ordinance not distinguish between sexually- oriented businesses principal
and sexually- oriented business accessory, and that a ten percent threshold be established
for the purpose - of defining adult uses within bookstores, motion picture rental
establishments or novelty establishments. Mr. Fee seconded the motion. All vote aye.
Motion carried. No further motions were offered with respect to including gross receipts
as a parameter for defining adult uses.
Mr. Hughes went on to explain that sexually- oriented businesses would be limited to the
PC -3 (Planned Commercial District). He also pointed out that the Amendment provided
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
June 8, 1993
Page three
standards for sexually- oriented businesses that required a 500 foot spacing between
sexually- oriented businesses and other sexually- oriented businesses, licensed day care
facilities, or property with the R -1, R -2, PRD, PSR or MDD District. Mr. Lewis inquired if
residences within the City of Richfield would be protected by the spacing requirement. Mr.
Hughes responded-that the Ordinance should be clarified to provide that the 500 foot
spacing requirement would apply to residences within an adjoining City. The Committee
generally agreed with this revision. Mr. Ackerberg inquired if the Ordinance specifically
defined "business .premises ". Mr. Hughes responded that:, "premises" was defined other
ordinances, but it would be well to include a definition in the ordinance amendment before
the Committee.
Mr. Hughes thereupon outlined the provisions of the licensing portion of the Ordinance
Amendment. 'He pointed out that the licensing provisions follow closely the requirements
for massage parlor licenses, which are now included within the City Code. He pointed out
the provisions relating to the application information, the timing of the approval or the
denial of the license by the City Manager, the appeal of the Manager's decision to the City
Council, the provisions that would cause a license application to be denied, the suspension
or revocation of the license and the restrictions with respect to the operation of a sexually -
oriented business. Mr. Gilligan pointed out that a reason for a denial of an application
included the conviction without sufficient rehabilitation of the applicant of a crime relating
to the operation of a sexually- oriented business. He noted that the Ordinance references
State Law with respect to the language on sufficient rehabilitation. Mrs. McClelland
inquired if multiple convictions for crimes relating to sexually- oriented businesses could be
grounds to deny a license. Mr. Halberg responded that the circumstance would best be
reviewed on a case -by -case basis. Mrs. McClelland inquired as to the hours of operation
for a sexually- oriented business. Mr. Hughes responded that the proposed Ordinance
provided that a sexually- oriented business could not operate between the hours of 10:00
P.M. and 8:00 A.M. Mrs. McClelland expressed concern that this time period may be too
restrictive. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the Bloomington Ordinance restricted the hours
of operation between 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. Mr. Ackerberg noted that the adverse
secondary affects of sexually- oriented businesses typically occur after dark. He therefore
advocated that the 10:00 P.M. to 8: A.M. restrictions should stand. After further
discussion, the Committee generally agreed that the hours of operation should be restricted
between 10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M.
Mr. Lonsbury reminded the Committee that at the last meeting it directed staff to prepare
a licensing provision for consideration by the Committee. He pointed out that the
Committee had not as yet agreed to the concept of the licensing provision. Mrs. Shaw
agreed with Mr. Lonsbury and asked Mr. Gilligan for his opinion concerning the
appropriateness of the licensing provision. Mr. Gilligan responded that the licensing may
provide another tool for regulation but it also may provide an opportunity for an additional
MINUTES /SEXUALLY- ORIENTED BUSINESS COMMITTEE
June 8, 1993
Page four
challenge of the constitutionality of the Ordinance. He explained the Courts have generally
upheld the provisions of zoning ordinance that regulate sexually- oriented businesses but
that the licensing provisions are more frequently challenged. He noted, however, that
Court cases do not provide clear direction on this issue. Mr. Halberg pointed out that the
City must do a balancing test between the desirability of requiring licenses on one hand
with the risk of a challenge on the other hand. After further discussion, Mrs. Shaw moved
that the Committee accept the concept of a licensing provision in the draft Ordinance. Mr.
Fee seconded the motion. All voted aye except Mr. Hays and Mr. Lonsbury who voted No.
After further discussion, Mr. Fee moved that the Committee accept the licensing provision
submitted by staff. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All voted Aye. Motion carried.
The Committee discussed the submission of its report and findings to the City Council. Mr.
Hughes recommended that the Committee's report be submitted to the Couzicil at their
June 21, 1993, meeting. He explained that the draft Ordinance would have to be
considered by the Planning Commission for action prior to adoption of the zoning portion
of the Amendment. Mr. Lonsbury moved that the draft Ordinance and other materials
assembled by the Committee be submitted to the City Council with a recommendation that
the Ordinance be adopted. Mr. Hays seconded the motion. All voted Aye. Motion carried.
There being no further business, Mr. Lewis adjourned the meeting at 6:25 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City Manager
GLH /dr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
FROM: * Jerry Gilligan
DATE: March 12, 1993
RE: Regulation of Sexually- Oriented Businesses
It has been proposed that the City Council consider enacting an
ordinance that would regulate sexually- oriented businesses including adult
bookstores and theaters. Any ordinance regulating such businesses will be closely
scrutinized by a court and needs to be drafted in a manner which does not violate
the First Amendment requirements related to freedom of speech and expression.
An ordinance regulating sexually- oriented businesses may not be enacted for the
sole purpose and intent of restricting sexually - explicit speech, since restrictions based
on the content of speech are unconstitutional per se.
Other municipalities have regulated sexually- oriented businesses
through zoning restrictions and /or licensing requirements, and this type of
regulation have been held constitutional by the courts if properly drafted and
enacted. In determining the constitutionality of any licensing requirements, courts
have balanced the burden on speech imposed by the restriction against the
importance and validity of the municipality's interest in its enforcement. Zoning
restrictions have been upheld if their intent is to control the adverse effects of
sexually- oriented businesses on the surrounding community. The U.S. Supreme
Court has upheld an ordinance regulating adult bookstores and theaters which by its
terms was designed to prevent crime, protect the city's retail trade, maintain
property values and generally protect and preserve the quality of the city's
neighborhoods, commercial districts and urban life. In upholding the ordinance,
the Supreme Court set forth the following requirements for valid zoning
restrictions on adult bookstores and theaters:
1. The predominant intent of the municipality in enacting
the zoning ordinance must not be to suppress or harass adult
establishments;
2. The municipality must show a substantial government
interest in zoning adults uses;
DORSEY & WHITNEY
.\ 11.1N'1'1h.N -...
I The ordinance zoning the adult uses must be narrowly
drawn so as not to exceed the degree of regulation justified by the
government interest;
4. The ordinance must precisely define the adult uses it
regulates; and
5. The ordinance must provide adult establishments with a
reasonable opportunity to locate in the municipality.
Through zoning restrictions the City could limit sexually- oriented
businesses to certain areas of the City so long as there still remain a reasonable
opportunity for such businesses to locate in the City. Zoning restrictions passed by
other municipalities either require sexually- oriented businesses to locate in a
specific area or require dispersal of such businesses throughout the municipality.
The ordinance upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited adult motion picture
theaters from locating within 1,000 feet of any residential zone, single or multiple
family dwelling, church, park or school. In that case over 5% of the city's area
remained available for adult motion picture theaters.
. To enact valid zoning restrictions for sexually- oriented businesses the
City needs to demonstrate a causal link between the presence of such businesses in
the City and the interests the City seeks to protect. The U.S. Supreme Court has held
that a city could rely on experiences of nearby cities which have studied the impact
of sexually- oriented businesses in their communities. This study and evidence of
adverse effects needs to be compiled before enacting any ordinance and
Councilmembers should familiarize themselves with the evidence prior to voting
on the ordinance. Any ordinance must be narrowly drawn so as not to exceed the
degree of regulations justified by the governmental interest intended to be advanced
and must precisely define the businesses to be regulated.
At the present time the City does not have any ordinance which
specifically regulates sexually- oriented businesses. Were an adult bookstore or
theater to attempt to locate in a commercial area in the City, the City would have
difficulty preventing such business from locating in such area. As previously stated,
if the City Council wishes to enact an ordinance regulating sexually- oriented
businesses it is necessary for the City to demonstrate the adverse secondary effects of
sexually- oriented businesses. To accomplish this, it is recommended that a study
committee be appointed to compile and review the studies prepared or reviewed by
other cities on the impact of sexually- oriented businesses on their cities and, if
determined to be necessary, prepare its own study. The committee would present
the studies and its findings to the City Council for its review and consideration prior
to enactment of the ordinance.
JPG:cmn
-2-
DORSEY & WHITNEY
.% 1'.l.." ..l.11 l"'I.1 "i,",; 11.",Y _ ,,,.,,w1.(,.).,- . - """.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sexually -Oriented Business Committee
FROM: Jerry Gilligan
DATE: May 21,1993
RE: Zoning District and Licensing Issues
At the May 11, 1993 Committee meeting, questions were raised
concerning whether the City could restrict sexually -oriented businesses to a portion
of a zoning district, and as to whether the ordinance should contain a licensing
provision.
Restricting to Portions of a Zoning District
The authority for the City to zone is contained in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.357. This section requires that zoning regulations shall be uniform for
each class or kind of buildings, structures or land and for each class or kind or use
throughout the district. Consequently because of this uniformity requirement, the
City may not prohibit certain uses in a portion of a zoning district while permitting
the use in the remaining portion of the district.
Licensing
Requiring a license to operate a sexually- oriented business may be of
some limited additional value. A licensing requirement is more susceptible to
constitutional challenges than a zoning restriction, and the City's ability to deny a
license to an applicant will need to be very limited in order to withstand a
constitutional challenge. Even a very narrowly drawn licensing requirement may
not withstand challenge. In general, the only grounds for denying a license (other
than for the business being in violation of the zoning ordinance) should be based on
the owner or operator having been convicted of a crime directly related to the
operation of a sexually- oriented business, i.e., sale to minors. The grounds for
denying a license must be related and serve the purpose the City is trying to protect
in enacting the ordinance on sexually - related businesses.
Once a license is granted, the grounds for revoking a license must also
be narrow and tied into violation of the zoning ordinance and convictions for a
DORSEY & WHITNEY
.\ 1•. \N'1' \t.Nwll11• I�• "1.1 INw.: 1•H�Ir1.�+HH1 \'.\I. l \�HIY�H.\'1'It) \'N
crime related to operation of a sexually- oriented business. Any revocation will
require a public hearing before the City Council.
In summary, the additional value a licensing requirement may have
over zoning restrictions only is the ability to deny or revoke a license to someone
convicted of crimes related to sexually -oriented business, which would give the City
an additional remedy which it would not have under a zoning ordinance.
However, licensing requirements would be more susceptible to attack on
constitutional grounds than zoning restrictions.
7
DORSEY & WHITNEY
THOI'ISEN&N ECK. U
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ite 600. Edinborough Corporate Center East
) Edinborough Way • Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450 CORDON V JOHNSON DONALD D. SMITH DENNIS %I. PATRICK OF COUNSEL:
JOHN K. BOUQUET MARSH J. HALBERG DAVID J. MCGEE JACK W. CARLSON
JAMES VA -N ALKENBURG WILLIAM E.SJOHOLM BECKY TOEVS ROONEY PHILIPSIEFF
MARK G. OHNSTAD THOMAS R. KELLEY TRACEY L. OLSON HELGE THOMSEN. Retired
MINNESOTA CRIMINAL STATUTES GLENN G. LNYBECK. Reared
STATUTE
609.321 Prostitution; definitions
609.322 Solicitation, inducement and promotion of prostitution
609.33 Disorderly house
609.34 Fornication
617.23 Indecent exposure; penalties
617.241 Obscene materials and performances; distribution and
exhibition prohibited; penalty
617.243 Indecent literature; distribution
617.245 Civil action; use of a minor in a sexual performance
617.246 Use of minors in sexual performance prohibited
617.247 Possession of pictorial representations of minors
617.26 Mailing and carrying obscene matter
617.291 Sexually explicit material and exhibitions;
purpose and policy of the legislature
617.293 Harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors
prohibited
617.294 Exhibition prohibited
617.296 Penalties; injunctive remedies
617.80 PUBLIC NUISANCES- Definitions
617.81 Nuisance; acts constituting; injunction; notice
617.82 Temporary Order
609.321. Prostitution; definitions
Subdivision 1. For the purposes of sections 609.321 to 609.324, the follow-
ing terms have the meanings given.
Subd. 2. "Business of prostitution" means any arrangement between or
organization of two or more persons, acting other than as prostitutes or
patrons, who commit acts punishable under sections 609.321 to 609.324.
Subd. 3. "Force" includes, but is not limited to, assault, as defined in this
chapter, and coercion, as defined in section 609.27.
Subd. 4. • "Patron" means an individual who hires or offers or agrees to
hire another individual to engage in sexual penetration or sexual contact.
Subd. 5. "Place of prostitution" means a house or other place where
prostitution is practiced.
Subd. 6. "Position of authority" means the circumstances under which an
individual is charged, no matter how briefly, whether by delegation or
otherwise, with rights, duties or responsibilities for the health, welfare or
supervision of another individual.
Subd. 7. "Promotes the prostitution of an individual" means any of the
following wherein the person knowingly:
(1) Solicits or procures patrons for a prostitute; or
(2) Provides, leases or otherwise permits premises or facilities owned or
controlled by the person to aid the prostitution of an individual; or
(3) Owns, manages, supervises, controls, keeps or operates, either alone or
with others, a place of prostitution to aid the prostitution of an individual; or
(4) Owns, manages, supervises, controls, operates, institutes, aids or facili-
tates, either alone or with others, a business of prostitution to. aid the
prostitution of an individual; or
(5) Admits a patron to a place of prostitution to aid the prostitution of an
individual; or
(6) Transports an individual from one point within this state to another
point either within or without this state, or brings an individual into this state
to aid the prostitution of the individual.
Subd. 8. "Prostitute" means an individual who engages in prostitution.
Subd. 9. "Prostitution" means engaging or offering or agreeing to engage
for hire in sexual penetration or sexual contact..
Subd. 10. "Sexual contact" means any of the following acts, if the acts can
reasonably be construed as being for the purpose of satisfying the actor's
sexual impulses:
(i) The intentional touching by an individual of a prostitute's intimate parts;
or
(ii) The intentional touching by a prostitute of another individual's intimate
parts.
Subd. 11. "Sexual penetration" means any of the following acts, if for the
purpose of satisfying sexual impulses: sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fella-
tio, anal intercourse, or any intrusion however slight into the genital or anal
openings of an individual's body by any part of another individual's body or
any object used for the purpose of satisfying sexual impulses. Emission of
semen is not necessary._
Subd. 12. A "public place" means a public street or sidewalk, a pedestrian skyway
system as defined in section 469.125, subdivision 4, a hotel, motel, or other place of public
accommodation, or a place licensed to sell intoxicating liquor, wine, nonintoxicating malt
beverages, or food.
Amended by Laws 1987, c. 291, § 242.
609.322. Solicitation, inducement and promotion of prostitution
Subdivision 1. Whoever, while acting other than as a prostitute or patron, intentionally
does either of the following may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 20 years
or to payment of a fine of not more than $40,000, or both:
(1) solicits or induces an individual under the age of 16 years to practice prostitution;'
or
(2) promotes the prostitution of an individual under the age of 16 years. !
Subd. la. Whoever, while acting other than as 'a prostitute or patron, intentionally,
does any of the following may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years
or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both:. _
(1) Solicits or induces an individual at least 16 but less than 18 years of age to practice
prostitution; or
(2) Solicits or induces an individual to practice prostitution by means of force; or:
(3) Uses a position of authority to solicit or induce an individual to practice prostitution;;
or �
(4) Promotes the prostitution of an individual in the following circumstances:
(aj -The individual is at least 16 but less than 18 years of age; or
rvn (b) The actor knows that the individual has been induced or solicited to practice
tv
pros
titution by means of force; or
i ; (c) The actor knows that a position. of authority has been used to induce or solicit the
individual to practice prostitution.
a Subd. 2. Whoever, while acting other than as a prostitute or patron, intentionally does
any of the following may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to
pa),Tnent of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both:
�(1) Solicits or induces an individual to practice prostitution by means of trick, fraud, or
deceit; or
'(21 Being in a position of authority, consents to an individual being taken-or detained
for the purposes of prostitution; or
r(3) Promotes the prostitution of an individual in the following circumstances:
(a) The actor knows that the individual has been induced or solicited to practice
prostitution by means of trick, fraud or deceit; or
(b) The actor knows that an individual in a position of authority has consented to the
individual being taken or detained for the purpose of prostitution.
Subd. 3. Whoever, while acting other than as a prostitute or patron, intentionally does
any of the following may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than three years or
to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both:
_- (1) Solicits or induces an individual 18 years of age or above to practice prostitution; or
(2) Promotes the prostitution of an individual 18 years of age or older. .
Amended by laws 1992, c. 571, art 4, § 9.
609.33. Disorderly house
Subdivision 1. : Definition. For the purpose of this section, "disorderly house" means
a building, dwelling, place,. establishment, or premises in which actions or conduct
habitually occur in violation of laws relating to:
(1) the sale of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor,
(2) gambling;
(3) prostitution as defined in section 609.321, subdivision 9, or acts relating to prostitu-
tion; or
(4) the sale or possession of controlled substances as. defined in section 152.01, subdivi-
sion 4.., ;
Subd. 2. Prohibiting owning or operating a disorderly house. No person
may own, lease, operate, manage, maintain, or conduct a disorderly house, or
invite or attempt to invite others to visit or remain in the disorderly house. A
violation of this subdivision is a gross misdemeanor.
Subd. 3. Mandatory minimum penalties. (a) If a person is convicted of a
first violation of subdivision 2, in addition to any scntcnce of imprisonment
authorized by subdivision 2 which the court may impose, the court shall
impose a fine of not less than $300 nor more than $3,000.
(b) If a person is convicted of a second violation of subdivision 2, in
addition to any sentence of imprisonment authorized by subdivision 2 which
the court may impose, the court shall impose a fine of not less than $500 nor
more than $3,000.
(c) If a person is convicted of a third or subsequent violation of subdivision
2, in addition to any sentence of imprisonment authorized by ' subdivision 2
which the court may impose, the court shall impose a fine of not less than
$1,000 nor more than $3,000.
Subd. .4. Evidence. Evidence of unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent
malt liquor, of unlawful possession or sale of controlled substances, of prostitution or acts -
relating to prostitution, or of gambling or acts relating. to .gambling, is prima facie
evidence of the existence of a disorderly house. Evidence of sales of intoxicating liquor -
or.3.2 percent malt liquor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., while a person is
within a disorderly house, is prima. facie evidence that the person_ knew it- to be a-'
disorderly_ house.
Subd. 5. Local regulation. Subdivisions 1 to 4 do not prohibit or restrict a
local governmental unit from imposing more restrictive provisions.
Laws 1967,c.507,§ 10, eff. May 18, 1967. Amended by Laws 1984, c. 628, art. 3, § 11,
eff. May 3, 1984; Laws 1985, c. 277, § 1.
Subd: 6.- Pretrial release. • When a person is charged under this section with- owning,
or leasing a disorderly house, the court may require as a condition of pretrial release that
the defendant. bring an unlawful detainer action against a lessee who has violated the
covenant not to allow drugs established by section 504.181.
Amended by Laws 1989, c. 77, § 1, eff. Aug. 1, 1989; Laws 1991, c. 193, § 3; Laws 1991, c. 249, § '31.
609.34. Fornication
When any man and single woman have sexual intercourse with each other,
each is guilty of fornication, which is a misdemeanor.
Laws 1967, c. 507, § 11, eff. May 18, 1967. Amended by Laws 1971, c. 23, § 43, eff.
March 5, 1971.
617.23. Indecent exposure; penalties
Every person who shall willfully and lewdly expose the person's body, or
the priv4;e parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where others are
present, or shall procure another to expose private parts, and every person
who shall be guilty "of any open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior, or
any public indecency other than hereinbefore specified, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and punished by a fine of not less than $5, or by imprisonment
in a county jail for not less than ten days.
Every person committing the offense herein set forth, after having once
been convicted of such an offense in this state, shall be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
Amended by Laws 1986, c. 444.
617.241. Obscene materials and performances; distribution and exhibition prohibit-
ed; penalty
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms have the
meanings given them:
(a) "Obscene" means that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest
in sex and depicts or describes in a patently offensive manner sexual conduct and which,
taken as a whole, does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In
order to determine that a work is obscene, the trier of fact must find:
(i) that the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find
that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex;
(ii) that the work depicts sexual conduct specifically defined by clause (b) in a patently
offensive manner; and
(iii) that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific
value.
(b) " Sexual conduct" means any of the following:
(i) An act of sexual intercourse, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including
genital - genital, anal - genital, or oral - genital intercourse, whether between human beings or
between a human being and an animal.
(ii) Sadomasochistic abuse, meaning flagellation or torture by or upon a person who is
nude or clad in undergarments or in a sexually revealing costume or the condition of
being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restricted on the part of one so clothed or
who is nude.
(iii) Masturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibitions of the genitals including any
explicit, close -up representation of'a human genital organ..
(iv) Physical contact or simulated physical contact with the clothed or unclothed pubic
areas or buttocks of a human male or female, or the breasts of the female, whether alone
or between members of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals in an
act of apparent sexual stimulation or gratification.
(c) "Community" means the political subdivision from which persons properly qualified.
to serve as jurors in a criminal proceeding are chosen.
(d) "Work" means "material" or "performance."
(e) "Material" means a book, magazine, pamphlet, paper, writing, card, advertisement,
circular, print, picture, photograph, motion picture film, videotape, script, image, instru-
ment, statue, drawing, or other article.
(f) "Performance" means a play, motion picture, dance, or other exhibition performed
before an audience.
Subd. 2. Crime.. It is unlawful for a person, knowing or with reason to know its
content and character, to:
(a) exhibit,"sell, print, offer to sell, give away, circulate, publish, distribute or attempt
to distribute any obscene material; or
(b) produce, present, participate in, or direct an obscene performance.
Subd. 3. Penalty. A person violating subdivision 2 is guilty of a gross misdemeanor
and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year, or to payment of a
fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
Subd. 4. Second or subsequent violations. Whoever violates the provisions of subdi-
vision 2 within five years of a previous conviction under that subdivision is guilty of a
felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than two years, or to payment
of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
Amended by Laws 1988, c. 406, § 1, eff. June 1. 1988.
671.243. Indecent literature, distribution
Subdivision 1. Prohibited activity. No person, copartnership or corpora-
tion shall, as a condition to a sale or delivery for resale of any paper,
magazine, book, comic, periodical or publication, require that the purchaser
or consignee receive for resale any other article, book, comic or other
publication reasonably believed by the purchaser or consignee to be obscene
as defined in section 617.241.
Subd. 2. Penalty. A violation of subdivision 1 is a gross misdemeanor.
Laws 1957, c. 323, § 1. Amended by Laws 1983, c. 204, § 10, eff. May 21, 1983.
617.245. Civil action; use of a minor in a sexual performance
Subdivision .1." � Definitions. (a) The definitions in this subdivision apply to . this
section.
(b) "Minor" means any person who, at the time of use in a sexual performance, is under
the age of 16.
(c) "Promote" -means to produce, direct, publish, manufacture, issue, or advertise.
(d) "Sexual performance" means any play, dance, or other exhibition presented before
an audience or for purposes of visual or mechanical reproduction which depicts sexual
conduct as defined by paragraph (e).
(e) "Sexual conduct" means any of the following if the depiction involves a minor.
(1) an act of sexual intercourse, actual or simulated, including genital - genital, anal -
genital, or oral- genital intercourse, whether between human beings or between a human
being and an animal;
(2) sadomasochistic abuse, meaning flagellation, torture, or similar demeaning acts
inflicted by or upon a minor who is nude, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or
otherwise physically restrained on the part of one so unclothed;
(3) masturbation or lewd exhibitions of the genitals; and
(4) physical contact or simulated physical contact with the unclothed pubic areas:oc
buttocks of a human male or female, or the breasts of the female, whether aloine-::or
between members of .the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals in an act
of apparent.sexual stimulation or gratification.
Subd.-2. - Cause of action.' A cause'of action .exists for injury caused by the use .of -a
minor in a. sexual performance.. The cause of action exists against a person-'.who
promotes,.,;employs, uses,: or, permits a minor to..engage or assist others to engage,,inz
posing or modeling alone or with others in a sexual performance; if th e person knows oc:•
has reason to know that the conduct intended is a sexual performance.
A person found liable for injuries under this section is liable to the minor for damages: -
Neither consent to sexual performance by the minor or by the minors parent, guardian,-
or custodian,. or mistake as to the minor's age is a defense to the action. - • �_u:
Subd. 3. "Limitation' period. -An action for damages under this section must be
commenced withiri six years of the time the plaintiff knew or had reason to know injury=
was caused by plaintiff's use as .a minor in a sexual performance. The knowledge'of a
parent, guardian,'or custodian may not be imputed to the. minor.'; This section does not
affect the suspension of the statute of limitations during a period of disability under:
section 541.15.
Laws 1992, c. 571, art 12, § 1. —
617.246. Use of minors in sexual performance prohibited . 4
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purpose of this section, the terms
defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(b) "Minor" means any person under the age of 18.
(c) "Promote" means to produce, direct, publish, manufacture, issue, or
advertise.
(d) "Sexual performance" means any play, dance or other exhibition
presented before an audience or for purposes of visual or mechanical repro-
duction which depicts sexual conduct as defined by clause (e).
(e) "Sexual conduct" means any of the following if the depiction involves a
minor:
(i) An act of sexual intercourse, normal or perverted, actual or simulated,
including genital - genital, anal - genital, or oral - genital intercourse, whether
between human beings or between a human being and an animal.
(ii) Sadomasochistic abuse, meaning flagellation, torture, or similar de-
meaning acts inflicted by or upon a person who is nude or clad in undergar-
ments or in a revealing costume, or the condition of being fettered, bound or
otherwise physically restrained on the part of one so clothed.
___ . (iii) Masturbation or lewd exhibitions of the genitals.
(iv) Physical contact or simulated physical contact with the clothed or
unclothed pubic areas or buttocks of a human male or female, or the breasts
of the female, whether alone or between members of the same or opposite sex
or between humans and animals in an act of apparent sexual stimulation or
gratification.
(f) "Work" means an original or reproduction of a picture, film, photo-
graph, negative, slide, videotape, videodisc, or drawing.
Subd. 2. Use of minor. It is unlawful for a person to promote, employ,
use or permit a minor to engage in or assist others to engage in posing or
modeling alone or with others in any sexual performance if the person knows
or has reason to know that the conduct intended is a sexual performance.
Any person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a felony and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a
fine of not more than $ 10,000 for the first offense and $20,000 for a second or
subsequent offense, or both.
Subd. 3. Operation or ownership of business. A person who owns or
operates a business in which a work depicting a minor in a sexual perform-
ance, as defined in this section, is disseminated, and who knows the content
and character of the work disseminated, is guilty of a felony and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years, or to payment of a
fine of not more than $10,000 for the first offense and $20,000 for a second or
subsequent offense, or both.
Subd. 4. Dissemination. A person who, knowing or with reason to know
its content and character, disseminates for profit a work depicting a minor in
sexual performance, as defined in this section, is guilty of a felony and may
be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years, or to payment of
a fine of not more than $10,000 for the first offense and $20,000 for a second
or subsequent offense, or both.
Subd. 5. Consent; mistake. Neither consent to sexual performance by a
minor or the minor's parent, guardian, or custodian nor mistake as to the
minor's age is a defense to a charge of violation of this section.
Laws 1977, c. 371, § 1, eff. July 1, 1977. Amended by Laws 1982, c. 604, § 2, eff. May
1, 1982; Laws 1983, c. 204, § 11, eff. May 21, 1983; Laws 1984, c. 628, art. 3, §§ 7 to 9,
eff. May 3, 1984; Laws 1986, c. 444.
617.247. Possession of pictorial representations of minors
Subdivision 1. Policy; purpose. It is the policy of the legislature in
enacting this section to protect minors from the physical and psychological
damage caused by their being used in photographic representations of sexual
conduct which involves minors. It is therefore the intent of the legislature to
penalize possession of photographic representations of sexual conduct which
involve minors in order to protect the identity of minors who are victimized
by involvement in the photographic representations, and to protect minors
from future involvement in photographic representations of sexual conduct.
Subd. 2. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms
have the meanings given them:
(a) "Photographic representation" means an original or reproduction of a
film, videotape, videodisc, photograph, negative, or slide.
(b) "Sexual conduct" has the meaning given to it in section 617.246.
Subd. 3. Dissemination prohibited. A person who disseminates a photo-
graphic representation of sexual conduct which involves a minor, knowing or
with reason to know its content and character and that an actual minor is an
actor or photographic subject in it, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Subd. 4. Possession prohibited. A person who has in possession a photo-
graphic representation of sexual conduct which involves a minor, knowing or
with reason to know its content and character and that an actual minor is an
actor or photographic subject in it, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Subd. 5. Exception. This section does not apply to the performance of
official duties by peace officers, court personnel, or attorneys, nor to licensed
physicians, psychologists, or social workers or persons acting at the direction
of a licensed physician, psychologist, or social worker in the course of a bona
fide treatment or professional education program.
Subd. 6. Consent. Consent to sexual' performance by a minor or the
minor's parent, guardian, or custodian is not a defense to a charge of
violation of this section.
Subd. 7. Second offense. If a person is convicted of a second or subse-
quent violation of this section within 15 years of the prior conviction, the
court shall order a mental examination of the person. The examiner shall
report to the court whether treatment of the person is necessary.
Laws 1982, c. 604, § 3, eff. May 1, 1982. Amended by Laws 1983, c. 204; § 12, eff.
May 21, 1983; Laws 1986, c. 444.
617.26. Mailing and carrying obscene matter
Every person who shall deposit or cause to be deposited in any post office
in the state, or place in charge of any express company or other common
carrier or person for transportation, any of the articles or things specified in
section 617.241 or 617.25, or any circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement or
notice-relating thereto, with the intent of having the same conveyed by mail,
express, or in any other manner; or who shall knowingly or willfully receive
the same with intent to carry or convey it, or shall knowingly carry or convey
the same by express, or in any other manner except by United States mail,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The provisions of this section and section
617.25 shall not be construed to apply to an article or instrument used by
physicians lawfully practicing, or by their direction or prescription, for the
cure or prevention of disease.
Amended by Laws 1965, c. 51, § 85.
617.291. Sexually explicit material and exhibitions: purpose and policy of the legisla-
ture
Subdivision 1. The legislature finds that sexually explicit materials and exhibitions
presented before an audience are harmful to minors.
Subd. 2. It is in the best interest of the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of
this state, and especially of minors within the state, that commercial dissemination, and
dissemination without monetary consideration in a place of public accommodation, of
sexually explicit written, photographic, printed, sound or published materials, and of
plays, dances, or other exhibitions presented before an audience, that are deemed harmful
to minors, be restricted to persons over the age of 17 years; or, if available to minors
under the age of 18 years, that the availability of the materials be restricted to sources
within established and recognized schools, churches, museums, medical clinics and physi-
cians, hospitals, public libraries, or government sponsored organizations.
Amended by Laws 1987, c. 215, § 1, eff. Aug. 1, 1987.
617.293. . Harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors prohibited
Subdivision L. Dissemination. It is unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or loan
-for monetary consideration to a minor.
(a) Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film; or similar visual
representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts nudity,
sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors, or..:.:.
(b) Any book, pamphlet, .magazine, printed matter however- or sound .
recording which contains any matter enumerated in clause (a),-or which contains explicit
and detailed verbal descriptions or .narrative accounts -of sexual excitement, sexual
conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse which, taken as.'a whole, is harmful to minors:
Subd. 2. Display. (a) It is unlawful for any person commercially and knowingly to
exhibit or display any material which is harmful to minors in its content in anyplace of
public accommodation where minors are or may be present and where. minors are a_ ble to
view the material unless each item is kept in a sealed wrapper at all times:. "...
(b) It is unlawful for any person commercially and knowingly to exhibit or* display any
material the cover or packaging of which, standing alone, is harmful to minors in any.
place of public. accommodation where minors are or - -may be present-or allowed to be
present and where minors are able to view the material unless each. item is blocked from
view by an opaque cover.' The opaque cover requirement is satisfied if those portions of
the cover or packaging containing the material harmful - to minors are blocked from view
by an opaque cover. . .__ _ . _ . .. - -
(c) The provisions of this subdivision do not apply to the exhibition or display_ of
materials harmful to" minors under circumstances where minors are not present or are not
able to view the material or the material's cover or packaging. A person may comply
with the requirements of this paragraph by (1) physically segregating the material in a
manner that physically prohibits access : to and view of the material by minors, (2)
prominently posting at the entrance to the restricted area: "Adults only —you must be 18
to enter," and (3) enforcing the restriction.'
Amended by Laws 1988, c. 452, § 1, eff. Aug. 1; 1988:
617.294.-` Exhibition prohibited',. _
..It is unlawful for any person knowingly to exhibit for a monetary consideration to a.
minor or knowingly to sell to a. minor an admission ticket.or pass or knowingly to admit a
minor, whether or not for a monetary consideration- to a place of public accommodation
where there is exhibited a motion picture,'show or other - presentation or a play, dance, or
other exhibition presented before an audience which, in.whole or in' part, depicts nudity,.
sexual conduct, or, sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors.-..=
Amended by Laws 1987, c. 215, § 2, eff. Aug: 1; 1987. _ . _
617.296. Penalties; injunctive remedies
Subdivision 1.. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision la, a violation of any
provision of sections 617.291 to 617.297 is a gross misdemeanor.
Subd. Ia. Penalty . for display of harmful materials. A violation of section 617.293,
isubdivision 2, is a misdemeanor.
Subd. 2. Whenever any county attorney, or the attorney general of this
state, has reasonable cause to believe that any person within this state is
violating sections 617.291 to 617.297, the prosecuting attorney may by verified
petition seek a temporary restraining order or temporary injunction in the
district court in the county in which the alleged violation occurred. No
temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction shall be issued without
a prior show cause notice of hearing to the respondents named in the petition,
and an opportunity for the respondents to be heard. Personal service of the
show cause order and of the petition made as in civil actions on the named
respondents, or upon any of their employees or agents found within the state,
shall constitute sufficient notice. Such show cause order for hearing may be
returnable on the third day from the date of service as to a respondent who is
present in this state, and on the fifth day as to a person not a resident or not
found within this state.
Laws 1969, c. 1071, § 6, eff. June 7, 1969. Amended by Laws 1986, c. 444.
- - PUBLIC NUISANCES
617.80.- Definitions
Subdivision 1. Generally. The definitions in this section apply to sections 617.80 to
617.87.,
Subd. 2. - Building. 'Building" means a structure suitable for human shelter, a com-
mercial structure that is maintained for business activities that involve human occupation,
or any portion of such structures.
:..Subd. 3. Movable property. "Movable property" means furniture and fixtures. "
Subd. 4. Prostitution.. "Prostitution" or "prostitution related offenses" means the
conduct defined in sections 609.321 to 609.324. ,..
Subd. 5. Gambling. "Gambling" or "gambling related offenses" means the conduct
described in sections 609.75 to 609.762.
Subd. 6. Disorderly house. "Disorderly house" has the meaning assigned to it in
section 609.33.
Subd. 7. Owner. "Owner" for purposes of sections 617.80 to 617.87 means the person
in whose name the building or affected portion is recorded with the .county auditor for
taxation purposes. -
Subd.' 8. Interested party. "Interested party" for- purposes of sections 617.80 to
617.87 means any known lessee or tenant of a building or affected portion of a building
and any known agent of an ow_ ner,. lessee or tenant.`
Laws 1987, c. 283, § 1. Amended by laws. 1991, -c.. 193, § 5.
617.81. Nuisance; acts constituting; injunction; notice
Subdivision 1. Injunction. In order.to obtain a temporary injunction under section
617.82 or- a permanent injunction or order of abatement under section ' 617.83, the
provisions of sections 617.80 to 617.87 must be followed.
Subd. 2. Acts constituting a nuisance. (a) For purposes of sections 617.80 to 617.87 a
public nuisance exists upon proof of three or more misdemeanor - convictions or two or
more convictions, of which at least one is a gross misdemeanor or felony, within the
previous two years for:
(1) acts of prostitution or prostitution - related offenses committed within the building;
(2) acts of gambling or gambling - related offenses ,committed within the building;
(3) -keeping or permitting a disorderly house within the building;
(4) unlawful sale or possession of controlled substances committed within the building;
i (5) unlicensed sales of alcoholic beverages committed within the building in violation of
section 340A.401;
(6) unlawful sales or gifts of alcoholic beverages by an unlicensed person committed
within the building in violation of section 340A.503, subdivision 2, clause (1); or
(7) unlawful use or possession of a firearm in violation of section 609.66, subdivision la,
609.67, or 624.713, committed within the building'.
(b) A second or subsequent conviction under paragraph (a) may be used to prove the
existence of a nuisance if the conduct on which the second or subsequent conviction is
based occurred within two years following the first conviction, regardless of the date of
the conviction for the second or subsequent offense. "
Subd. 2a. Seizures and arrests constituting a nuisance. For purposes of sections
617.80 to 617.87, a public nuisance. exists upon proof of three qualifying events that
occurred on different days within the previous two months. ' For purposes of this section,
"qualifying event" means a lawful seizure of controlled substances within the building or
a lawful arrest within the building for the possession or sale of controlled substances
within the building or on the building's curtilage.
Subd..3.... Notice.. -Notice of a conviction described in subdivision 2, or of a qualifying
event described in subdivision 2a-,'must be mailed by the court administrator to the owner
of the building where the offense was committed and all other interested parties and must
be filed with the county recorder's office. 'This notice is considered sufficient to inform
all - interested parties that the building or: a portion of it is being used for purposes
constituting a public nuisance.
Laws 1987, - c.� 283, § 2.•.: Amended - by Law's 1989, 'c-':.112,: § 1; - Laws 1991, c. ` 193, §§ 6' tu' 8.
617.82. Temporary order
Whenever a city attorney, county attorney, or the attorney general has cause to believe
that a nuisance described in section 617.81, subdivision 2, exists within the jurisdiction the
attorney serves,. that attorney may by verified petition seek. a temporary injunction in
district court in the county in which the alleged public nuisance exists. No temporary
injunction may be issued without a prior show cause notice of hearing to the respondents
named in the petition and an opportunity for the respondents to be heard. Upon proof of
a nuisance described in section 617.81, subdivision 2, the court shall issue a temporary
injunction. Any temporary injunction issued must describe- the conduct to be enjoined.
Laws 1987, c. 283, § 3.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 18, 1993
TO: Sexually- Oriented Business Committee
FROM: -Gordon L. Hughes
SUBJECT: LAND AREAS IN VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS
At the May 11, 1993, Committee meeting, staff was asked to provide a breakdown of
the acreages contained in various zoning districts. The following table summarizes our
findings.
SUMMARY OF LAND AREAS
TOTAL AREA OF CITY - 10,240 ACRES
TOTAL
OF: CITY
C -1
19 ACRES
.18%
C -2
37 ACRES
.36%
C -3
225 ACRES
2.19%
PID
476 ACRES
4.64%
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 18, 1993
TO: Sexually- Oriented Business Committee
FROM: Gordon L. Hughes
SUBJECT: SIGN AND DISPLAY ISSUES
At the May 11, 1993, Committee meeting, members expressed concern with respect to the
signage and display of merchandise by sexually- oriented businesses. With respect to
display, the Committee was concerned about materials or activities that could be visible
from the exterior of the business.
Signs: The City currently has a restrictive sign ordinance. Prohibited signs include the
following:
Indecent Signs - signs containing offensive or indecent symbols, pictures or written
material
Roof Signs
Motion Signs
Portable Signs
Search Lights or Beacons
In all Planned Commercial Districts, 15 percent of the exterior wall area may be covered
with signage. In addition, each building is entitled to one free standing sign (in the PC -3
District, additional signs are allowed for multiple street frontages). In addition, the sign
ordinance, a) restricts temporary signs, b) limits projecting signs to 10 square feet, c)
prohibits banners and pennants, and d) prohibits illuminated signs which change in color
or intensity.
After discussing additional signage restrictions with the City Attorneys, we have concluded
that additional signage regulations may not be appropriate for sexually- oriented businesses.
In our opinion, holding such businesses to a greater signage standard than other businesses
may be viewed as discriminatory. We believe that our Ordinances already contain
sufficient safeguards which should protect the City from the signage which is typically
associated with such uses.
Memorandum/Sexually- Oriented Businesses Committee
May 18, 1993
Page two
Dis la : Mr. Halberg pointed out at the May 4, 1993, meeting, that State Statutes
currently restrict the display of certain materials. However, Mr. Halberg has pointed out
that while this Statute restricts the display of certain sexually explicit items, other items
which are not by themselves sexually explicit, may not be regulated. Such items could
include certain novelties or other devices. Therefore, it would be appropriate to include
additional restrictions in the proposed ordinance concerning displays. The Committee
should consider inserting the following paragraph for both Sexually- Oriented Businesses
Accessory and Sexually- Oriented Businesses Principal.
"No merchandise or activities of the sexually- oriented business
shall be visible from any point outside the business premises."
GLH /dr
Ordinance No. 1993 - an Ordinance
Amending the City Code to Provide Standards
For Sexually - Oriented Businesses
The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Subsection 850 -01 of the City Code is amended by adding the following
paragraphs=
"The Council also finds that sexually- oriented businesses have adverse secondary
characteristics particularly when they may be accessible to minors or are located
near residential properties or schools, day care centers, libraries and parks, and such
businesses can exert a dehumanizing influence on persons attending or using such
residential properties or schools, day care centers, libraries and parks.
Sexually- oriented businesses can contribute to an increase in criminal activity in the
area in which such businesses are located.
Sexually- oriented businesses can significantly contribute to the deterioration of
residential neighborhoods and can impair the character and quality of the residential
housing in the area in which such businesses are located, thereby exacerbating the
shortage of affordable and habitable housing for City residents.
The concentration of sexually- oriented businesses in one area can have a
substantially detrimental effect on the area in which such businesses are
concentrated and on the overall quality of urban life. A cycle of decay can result
from the influx and coricentration of sexually- oriented businesses. The presence of
such businesses is perceived by others as an indication that the area is deteriorating
and the result can be devastating -- other businesses move out of the vicinity and
residents flee from the area. Declining real estate values, which can result from the
concentration of such businesses, erode the City's tax base and contribute to overall
urban blight."
The regulation of the location and operation of sexually- oriented businesses is
warranted to prevent the adverse secondary effects of such businesses on the City's
crime rate, its retail trade, its property values, and in general the quality of the-
City's neighborhoods, commercial and industrial districts, and urban life.
Sec. 2. Subd. 3 of Subsection 850.03 of the City Code is amended by adding the following
definitions:
"Sexually- Oriented Business
Adult bookstores, adult motion picture theaters, adult motion picture rental, adult
mini -motion picture theaters, adult massage parlors, . adult steam
room/bathhouse /sauna facilities, adult companionship establishments, adult
rap /conversation parlors, adult health/sport clubs, adult cabarets, adult novelty
businesses, adult motion picture arcades, adult modeling studios, adult
hotels /motels, and adult body painting studios as herein defined. In addition, all
other premises, enterprises, establishments, businesses or places at or in which there
is an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description of "specified
sexual activities' or "specified anatomical areas" which are capable of being seen by
members of the public. The term "sexually- oriented business" shall not be construed
to include, i) professional offices of licensed physicians, chiropractors, psychologists,
physical therapists or similar licensed professionals performing functions authorized
under the licenses held, ii) establishments or businesses operated by or employing
licensed cosmetologists or barbers, performing functions authorized under licenses
held, iii) businesses or individuals licensed in accordance with Section 1340 of this
Code, and iv) the sale of clothing.
Specified Anatomical Areas: (i) Less than completely and opaquely covered human
genitals, pubic region, buttock, anus, or female breast(s) below a point immediately
above the top of the areola; or (ii) Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid
state, even if completely and opaquely covered.
Specified Sexual Activities: (i) Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral
copulation, anal intercourse, oral -anal copulation, bestiality, direct physical
stimulation of unclothed genitals, flagellation or torture in the context of a sexual
relationship, or the use of excretory functions in the context of a sexual relationship,
and any of the following sexually- oriented acts or conduct: anilingus, buggery,
coprophagy, coprophilia, cunnilingus, fellatio, necrophilia, pederasty, pedophilia,
piquerism, sapphism, zooerasty, or; (ii) Clearly depicted human genitals in the state
of sexual stimulation, arousal or tumescence, or; (iii) Use of human or animal
ejaculation, sodomy, oral copulation, coitus, or masturbation, or; (iv) Fondling or
touching of nude human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, or female breast or; (v)
Situations involving a person or persons, any of whom are nude, clad in
undergarments or in sexually revealing costumes, and who are engaged in activities
involving the flagellation, torture, fettering, binding or other physical restraint of
any such persons, or; (vi) Erotic or lewd touching, fondling or other sexually -
oriented contact with an animal by a human being, or; Human excretion, urination,
menstruation, vaginal or anal irrigation.
Adult Body Painting Studio. An establishment or business which provides the
service of applying paint or other substance, whether transparent or non -
transparent, to or on the body of a patron when such body is wholly or partially
nude in terms of "specified anatomical areas ".
2
Adult Bookstore. An establishment or business which barters, rents or sells items
consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tape, videotape, or
motion picture film and either alone or combined with Adult Motion Picture Rental
or Sales and Adult Novelty Sales within the same business premises has either 10
percent or more of its stock in trade or 10 percent or more of its floor area
containing items which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the
depiction or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas ".
Adult Cabaret. An establishment or business which provides dancing or other live
entertainment, if such dancing or other live entertainment is distinguished or
characterized by an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description
of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Companionship Establishment. An establishment or business or which
provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk or discussion
between an employee of the establishment and a customer, if such service is
distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Conversation/Rap Parlor. An establishment or business which provides the
service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion, if such service
is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Health/Sport Club. An establishment or business which excludes minors by
reason of age and is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified
sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Hotel or Motel. A hotel or motel from which minors are specifically excluded
from patronage and wherein material is presented which is distinguished or
characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to
"specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Massage Parlor, Health Club. An establishment or business which excludes
minors by reason of age, and which provides the services of massage, if such service
is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Mini -Motion Picture Theater. A building or portion of a building with a
capacity for less than 50 persons used for presenting material distinguished or
characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas" for observation by patrons therein.
3
Adult Motion Picture Rental or Sales. An establishment or business which barters,
rents or sells videotapes or motion picture film and either alone or in combination
with Adult Bookstore or Adult Novelty Sales within the same business premises has
either 10 percent or more of its stock in trade or 10 percent or more of its floor
area containing items which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
the depiction or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical
areas."
Adult Modeling Studio. An establishment or business which provides to customers,
figure models who engage in "specified sexual activities" or display "specified
anatomical areas" while being observed, painted, painted upon, sketched, drawn,
sculptured, photographed, or otherwise depicted by such customers.
Adult Motion Picture Arcade. Any place to which the public is permitted or invited
wherein coin or slug - operated or electronically, electrically or mechanically
controlled or operated still or motor picture machines, projectors or other image -
producing devices are maintained to show images to five or fewer persons per
machine at any one time, and where the images so displayed are distinguished or
characterized by an emphasis on depicting of describing "specified sexual activities"
or "specified anatomical areas ".
Adult Motion Picture Theater. A building or portion of a building with a capacity
of 50 or more persons used for presenting material distinguished or characterized
by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" for
observation by patrons therein.
Adult Novelty Sales. An establishment or business which sells devices which
stimulate human genitals or devices which are designed for sexual stimulation and
either alone or in combination with Adult Bookstore and Adult Motion Picture
Rental or Sales has either 10 percent or more of its stock and trade or 10 percent
or more of its floor area containing such items.
Adult Sauna/Bathhouse,/Steam Room. An establishment or business which excludes
minors by reason of age and which provides a steam bath or heat bathing room if
the service provided by the sauna is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis
on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas ".
Premises. The building or rooms under exclusive control or use by the owner or
operator of a sexually- oriented business.
Sec. 3. Subd. 4. of Subsection 850.16, Planned Commercial District, of the City Code is
amended by adding a principal use as follows:
"Sexually- Oriented Businesses"
4
Sec. 4. Subd. 11. of Subsection 850.16, Planned Commercial District, of the City Code is
hereby amended by adding a new paragraph N as follows:
"N. Standards for Sexually- Oriented Businesses.
1. No sexually- oriented business shall be located closer than 500 feet from any
other sexually- oriented business or licensed day -care facility. Measurements
shall be made in a straight line, without regard to intervening structures or
objects, from the nearest point of the actual business premises of the
sexually- oriented business to the nearest point of the.. actual business
premises of any other sexually- oriented business or licensed day -care facility.
2. No sexually- oriented business shall be located closer than 500 feet from any
property in the R -1, R -2, PRD, PSR or MDD District, or any residentially
zoned property in an adjoining city. Measurements shall be made in a
straight line, without regard to intervening structures or objects, from the
nearest point of the actual business premises of the sexually- oriented
business to the nearest boundary of the R -1, R -2, PRD, PSR, or MDD District.
Sec. S. The City Code is hereby amended to provide a new Section 1345 as follows:
"SECTION 1345 - SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES
1345.01 Findings. Purpose and Objectives. The Council finds that sexually- oriented
businesses have adverse secondary characteristics particularly when they may be accessible
to minors or are located near residential properties or schools, day care centers, libraries
and parks, and can exert a dehumanizing influence on persons attending or using such
places or facilities.
Sexually- oriented businesses can contribute to an increase in criminal activity in the area
in which such businesses are located, taxing city crime- prevention programs and law -
enforcement services.
Sexually- oriented businesses can significantly contribute to the deterioration of residential
neighborhoods and can impair the character and quality of the residential housing in the
area in which such businesses are located, thereby exacerbating the shortage of affordable
and habitable housing for City residents.
The concentration of sexually- oriented businesses in one area can have a substantially
detrimental effect on the area in which such businesses are concentrated and on the overall
quality of urban life. A cycle of decay can result from the influx and concentration of
sexually- oriented businesses. The presence of such businesses is perceived by others as an
indication that the area is deteriorating and the result can be devastating -- other
businesses move out of the vicinity and residents flee from the area. Declining real estate
5
values, which can result from the concentration of such businesses, erode the Cites tax
base and contribute to overall urban blight.
The regulation of sexually- oriented businesses by prescribing licensing requirements is
warranted to prevent .criminal activity and promote public health. Further, the prevention
of criminal activity and the promotion of public health requires intensive efforts with
respect to sexually- oriented businesses which exceed those required to control and regulate
other business activities in the City.
1345.02 Terms. The'following terms have the meanings provided by Section 850 of
this Code:
A. Sexually- Oriented Business
B. Specified Anatomical Areas
C. Specified Sexual Activities
D. Adult Body Painting Studio
E. Adult Bookstore
F. Adult Cabaret
G. Adult Companionship Establishment
H. Adult Conversation/Rap Parlor
I. Adult Health/Sport Club
J. Adult Hotel or Motel
K. Adult Massage Parlor, Health Club
L. Adult Mini- Motion Picture Theatre
M. Adult Motion Picture Rental 'or Sales
N. Adult Modeling Studio
O. Adult Motion Picture Arcade
P. Adult Motion Picture Theatre
Q. Adult Novelty Business
R. Adult Sauna/Bathhouse /Steam Room
1345.03 License Required. No person shall operate a sexually- oriented business within
the City unless such business is currently licensed under this Section.
1345.04. License Application. Every application for a license under this Section shall
be made on a form supplied by the Clerk and shall be filed with the Clerk. The provisions
of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the
holders of such licenses. In addition to the information required by Section 160 of this
Code, the application for a license under this Section shall contain the following
information. Failure to complete or supply such information may cause a license to be
denied.
A. If the applicant is a natural person:
T
1. The true name, place and date of birth, current address and telephone
number of the applicant.
2. Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other
than the applicant's true name; and if so, such name or names and
information concerning dates and places where used.
3. A specific statement as to the type and nature of the business to be
licensed.
4. The name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a name other than
the full individual name of the applicant, in which case a certified copy of the
certification required by M.S. Chapter 333, shall be attached to the
application.
S. The addresses at which the applicant has lived during the previous five
years, including a statement of how long the applicant has been continuously
a resident of the State during the period as of and immediately preceding the
date of application.
6. The kind, name and location of every business or occupation in which the
applicant has been engaged during the preceding five years.
7. The names and addresses of the applicant's employer(s) and partner(s),
if any, who were such at any time during the preceding five years.
8. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime, or
violation of any provisions of this Code or State Law other than traffic
violations and, if so, information as to the time, place and offense for which
convictions were had.
9. A physical description of the applicant.
B. If the applicant is a partnership:
1. The names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning
each partner as is required of an applicant under paragraph A of this
Subsection.
2. The name(s) of the managing partner(s), and the interest of each partner
in the business.
3. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the
application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to trade
7
name under the provisions of M.S. Chapter 333, a certified copy of such
certification shall also be attached. -
C. If the applicant is a corporation or other organization.
1. The name of the applicant, and if incorporated, the state of incorporation.
2. A true Certificate of Good Standing, dated as of a current date, and true
copies of the Articles of Incorporation or Association Agreement and Bylaws
shall be attached to the application. If a foreign corporation, a Certificate of
Authority issued pursuant to M.S. Chapter 303, shall also be attached.
3. The name of the person(s) who
information concerning the person(s)
paragraph A of this Subsection.
is to manage the business and all
as is required of an applicant under
4. The names of all officers, directors and persons who control or own an
interest in excess of 5% in such corporation or organization and all
information concerning the persons as is required of an applicant under
paragraph A. of this Subsection.
D. The location of the premises to license and a floor plan of the premises.
E. Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities or has had a license
revoked, or has been denied a license, to conduct any of the activities
required to be licensed hereunder; and if so, when and where the applicant
is or was so licensed, has had a license revoked or has been denied a license.
1345.05 License and Investigation Fees.
Subd. 1 License Fee. Each application for a license or renewal license shall be
accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Upon rejection of any
application for a license, the Clerk shall refund the amount paid.
Subd. 2 Investigation Fee. At the time of each original application for a
license, the applicant shall deposit an investigation fee as set forth in Section 185
of this Code. The cost of the investigation will be based on the expense involved.
All deposit monies not expended on the investigation will be refunded to the
applicant.
1345.06 Investigation. All applications shall be referred by the Clerk to the Police
Chief and to such other City departments for investigation of facts set forth in the
application. Within 45 days after the application date, the Police Chief and any other
consultants shall submit a written recommendation to the Manager as to issuance or non-
E
issuance of the license, setting forth the facts upon which the recommendation is based.
1345.07 Approval or Denial of Application Within 60 days after the application date,
the Manager shall either approve or deny the application and shall notify the Clerk in
writing of the decision. If the application is approved, the Clerk shall issue the license.
If the application is denied, the Clerk shall furnish written notice of the denial to the
applicant, together with the reason or reasons for denial. In addition to the reasons set
forth in Subsection 160.04 of this Code a license may also be denied for any of the
following reasons:
Subd. 1. Under Legal Age. If an individual applicant is under the age of 18.
Subd. 2. Conviction without Sufficient Rehabilitation. If the applicant, or any
principal officers, managers, directors, shareholders, or owners, if a corporation or
association, or any partners, if a partnership, has been convicted of any crime or
crimes directly relating to the operator of a sexually- oriented business, as provided
in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not shown competent evidence of sufficient
rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties and responsibilities, as
provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 3.
Subd. 3. Prior Denial of License. If the applicant, or any principal officers,
manager, directors, shareholders, or owners, if a corporation or association, or any
partners, if a partnership, has within two years prior to the date of application been
denied a license under this Section or within the period has had revoked any license
issued under this Section.
Subd. 4. Zoning Restriction. If the premises to be licensed does not meet all
of the requirements of Section 850 of this Code with respect to sexually- oriented
businesses.
Subd. ,5. . Ineligible Premises. If the premises to be licensed is currently licensed
as an escort service, physical culture and health service, physical culture and health
club, reducing club, reducing salon or massage parlor in accordance with Section
1340 of this Code or is currently licensed to sell beer, wine or liquor in accordance
with Section 900 of this Code.
1345.08. Renewal Application. Not less than 30 nor more than 60 days before the
expiration of any license issued pursuant to this Section, any license holder desiring to
renew the license shall submit a written application to the Clerk on forms provided by the
Clerk together with payment in full of the license fee as required for the original license.
The renewal application shall be forwarded to the Manager who shall, within 30 days after
the renewal application date, either approve or deny the application and shall notify the
Clerk in writing of this decision. The Clerk shall then issue the license or, in case of denial,
notify the applicant in writing of the denial setting forth the reason or reasons therefor.
E
1345.09. Appeal to Council. Any applicant may appeal the denial of a license or a
license renewal by filing a written notice of appeal to the Council in the Clerk's office
within 30 days after the denial. The Council shall hear the appeal within 30 days after the
notice is filed, and opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard in.favor of or
opposing the issuance or renewal of the license. The Council may order and conduct such
additional investigation as it deems necessary. Any licensee is authorized to continue to
operate until final action by the- Council upon licensee's renewal application, unless
prohibited by Council resolution made after the denial.
1345.10. license Not Transferable; Duration. Each license shall be issued to the
applicant only and shall not be transferable to another holder. Any change in the persons
named as partners on the application, as required by paragraph B. 1, of Subd. 1 of
Subsection 1345.04 and any change in the persons who are named °in the application as
required by paragraph C. 4, of Subd. 1, of Subsection 1345.04, shall be deemed a transfer
for purposes of this Section. If the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited
partners of ,less than 25% cumulatively over the license period, shall not be deemed a
transfer. The change in or addition of a vice- president, . secretary, or treasurer of a
corporation licensee shall not be deemed a transfer. All licenses issued pursuant to this
Section shall be effective from July 1 through June 30.
1345.11. Suspension or Revocation of license. The Council may suspend for any
period not exceeding 60 days, or revoke, any license issued pursuant to this Section upon
finding a violation of any provision of this Section or upon violation of any other provision
of this Code or State Law or regulation affecting the activities covered by this Section.
Except in the case of a suspension pending a hearing on revocation, revocation or
suspension by the Council shall be preceded by written notice to the licensee of a hearing
in accordance with Subsection 160.16 of this Code. The notice may be served upon the
licensee personally or by mailing it to the business or residence address set forth in the
application or on file with the Clerk. The notice shall give at least ten days notice of the
time and place of the hearing and shall state the nature of the charges against the licensee.
The Council may, without notice, suspend any license pending a hearing on revocation for
a period not exceeding 30 days.
1345.12. Restrictions and Regulations.
Subd. 1. Hours of Operation. No business licensed under this Section shall be
open for business, nor shall any customers be permitted on the premises, between
the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M.
Subd. 2. Minors. No licensee shall permit or allow any person under the age
of 18 years to enter the licensed premises. The licensee shall request proof of age
of all persons the licensee believes to be under the age of 18 years.
Subd. 3. Health and Sanitation. A licensee shall not allow:
10
A. Any partition between a subdivision, portion, or part of the licensed premises
having an aperture which is designed or constructed to facilitate sexual intercourse,
sodomy, or fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region or
pubic hair, buttocks, or female breast between persons on either side of the
partition.
B. A licensee shall not allow or have on the licensed premises or adjoining areas
any booths, stalls, or partitions used for the viewing of motion pictures or other
forms of entertainment that have doors, curtains, or portal partitions, unless such
booths, stalls, or partitions have at least one side open to an adjacent public room
so that the area inside is visible to persons in the adjacent public room. Such areas
shall be lighted in a manner that the persons in the area used for viewing motion
pictures or other forms of entertainment are visible from the adjacent public rooms.
C. The Sanitarian shall have the authority to inspect or cause to be inspected
the licensed premises and adjoining areas in order to ascertain the source of
infection or reduce the spread of communicable diseases. The Sanitarian shall have
the authority to issue orders to the licensee regarding health and sanitation."
Subd. 4. Display. No products or merchandise, or any activities which occur
inside the licensed premises shall be visible from any point outside the licensed
premises.
11
f
A
M B.
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JUNE S. 1993
10:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Gordon Hughes
William Bernhjelm
Alison Fuhr
MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Sherman
OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Robin Hansen, 4716 Townes Road
Ms. Susan Wahman, 4715 Meadow Road
Ms. Karol Schneider, 6905 West Shore Drive
Mr. & Mrs. James Kakalios, 6825 West Shore Drive
Ms. Carolyn Kohrs, 6517 Sherwood Avenue
Ms. Teena Hatch, 6405 Parkwood Road
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Craig Swanson, City of Edina
Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department
SECTION A:
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified and
the Council's authorization of recommended action.
(1) Request for "STOP" signs on West 48th Street at either Townes Road or
Meadow Road for speed and volume control.
Request made by Lynne Morishita, 4001 West 48th Street.
ACTION TAKEN:
Ms. Wahman and Ms. Hansen, representing the area to be addressed,
expressed concern for the volumes and speed in the area due to an influx of
more children to the neighborhood. They stated that besides having a bus
stop at 48th and Townes Road where children congregate, there are also
several children that play in the meadow -like area. Also, they felt traffic and
volumes had increased due to persons using West 48th and Townes Road
as a pass through area to reach the intersection at Sunnyside Road and
France Avenue.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
Mr. Swanson said that three speed surveys had been conducted, along with
studies on turning motions and review of accident history. The accident
history showed no accidents in the past three years except for three directly
at the intersection of West 48th Street and France Avenue. The speed survey
during the morning hours of 7:40 AM to 8:20 AM showed 32 vehicles passing
through this area with the 85 percentile speed being 32 MPH for eastbound
traffic and 30 MPH for westbound traffic. The afternoon survey, conducted
from 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM, showed 61 vehicles passing through this area with
the 85 percentile speed being 33 MPH for eastbound traffic and 30 MPH for
westbound. No citations would have been warranted during the morning
hours and possibly one during the afternoon, which was a vehicle registered
to a Minneapolis location. At the time of the surveys, Mr. Swanson also
stated that the eastbound West 50th Street traffic was stacking to the
proximity of Wooddale Avenue. He also
offered that he had been advised by a resident of the area, who recently
relocated from Chicago, that private signs drawn up by the residents might
be an option.
Mr. Hoffman, in consideration of the statistics, stated that the Committee
would see no need to modify or legislate for volumes under 1,000 vehicles
per day on this classification of roadway. He approximated the volumes to
be 600 vehicles per day. In response to a question, he also stated that the
City has gotten away from "SLOW - CHILDREN AT PLAY` signs in lieu of more
current pedestrian/ child signs. Mrs. Fuhr also offered that 25 MPH advisories
could be added to this type of signing. Mrs. Fuhr asked Mr. Swanson if
sidewalks had been discussed with the concerned parties, as well as if a
license plate survey had been conducted. Mr. Swanson responded that a
license plate survey had not been compiled and that he had, in - fact,
discussed the possibility of sidewalks and had yet to reply to Ms. Morishita
regarding some cost concerns.
Mrs. Fuhr moved installation of "PEDESTRIAN" signs along with the 25
MPH advisory sign attachment for each side of West 48th Street between
Townes Road and Meadow Road. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion.
Motion carried
3 -1.
(2) Request for speed control on West Shore Drive (6600 to 7000) with consider-
ation given to a multi -way "STOP" sign at Dunberry Lane at West Shore Drive.
Request made by Karol Schneider, 6905 West Shore Drive.
E
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson began by presenting the survey results and past statistics for
this area. In the past three years, there have been no reportable accidents
on West Shore Drive and three have been reported at the intersection of West
70th Street and West Shore. Mr. Swanson had also conducted two speed
surveys. In the survey conducted between 7:35 AM and 8:35 AM, 71 vehicles
were observed with a 2 -to -1 ratio traveling southbound. The 85 percentile
speed of the vehicles was 34 MPH for southbound and 31 MPH for
northbound traffic. During the afternoon survey, conducted between 3:45 PM
and 4:45 PM, 114 vehicles were observed with northbound travel exceeding
southbound by approximately 10 %. The 85 percentile speed during this
survey was 32 MPH for northbound traffic and 32 MPH for southbound. Mr.
Swanson stated that it would have been marginal for enforcement purposes.
He also stated that he paid particular attention to pedestrian counts, school
children and bikers in the area and stated that the range of 12 to 15 during
the period would possibly meet criteria for pedestrian signing. Mr. Swanson
also observed that the maximum speeds were normally reached just north of
Dunberry Lane. Dunberry Lane is presently stopped at West Shore Drive.
Ms. Schneider presented the area concerns of high vehicle and bus traffic
daily, and also commented that there are several commercial vehicles, such
as lawn maintenance vehicles, that use West Shore Drive. Ms. Kakalios
echoed the concern that commercial vehicles do not have a vested interest
in the neighbor -hood or in the safety issues of the citizens. She also felt that
she would like to see a crosswalk; however, she did feel that driver's do not
comply with crosswalk right of way and therefore it might make the situation
more dangerous. Mr. Kakalios further stated that there are no sidewalks on
this section of West Shore Drive and that he felt traffic should somehow be
diverted from West 66th Street to West 70th Street.
Mr. Hughes wondered if the situation was not unlike Cornelia Drive, which
had been discussed recently as a Traffic Safety agenda item. Mr. Swanson
said that it was, in fact, similar. Residents had originally requested "STOP"
signs at the intersection of West 68th and Cornelia Drive and the Committee
had not recommended the signs, but instead recommended pedestrian and
park signing.
Mr. Hoffman summarized the issues as speed and volume. The service
vehicles in the area were not unlike elsewhere in the City. He felt that the
southbound, downhill traffic might be the main concern, and surveying had
thus far revealed that these were not citable speeds. Mr. Hoffman further
stated that the highest percentage of "STOP" sign compliance happens when
3
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
the signing makes practical sense. He stated that the Committee advocates
sidewalks as the ultimate solution, but realizes that cost is an issue with most
residents. He also commented that the City Council does have policies on
4 -way "STOP" signs and the current signs would probably not be updated to
4 -way unless volumes warranted.
The residents asked if switching the current "STOP" signs from Dunberry to
West Shore Drive might help or also possibly a 3 -way "STOP ". Mr. Hoffman
again stated that in order to achieve compliance the signing would have to
make sense to the driver. Mr. Bernhjelm offered that in some scenarios this
can have a negative effect as the driver would try to make up his time after
stopping, thus creating further speed and safety concerns. Mr. Hoffman
stated that pedestrian signs might ,be a good first step toward making the
public aware of the need for caution on West Shore.
Mr. Hughes moved to install "PEDESTRIAN" signs on northbound and
southbound West Shore Drive in the proximity of Wilford Way. Mrs. Fuhr
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Mrs. Fuhr at this time asked to briefly discuss possible crosswalk solutions.
Mr. Hughes felt compliance would be a major concern and Mr. Swanson also
noted that the criteria for a crosswalk would not be met, based on the drafted
copy of warrants.
(3) Request for "PEDESTRIAN" sign with 25- mile - per -hour advisory in lieu of
"DEAF CHILD" sign in the area of 6405 Parkwood Road.
Request made by Mrs. T. Hatch, 6405 Parkwood Road.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mrs. Hatch began by stating that she is concerned, especially during the
morning and evening rush hours periods, at the speed of vehicles on
Parkwood Road which is quite curved. She has. a hearing impaired child but
does not want to specifically mark the roadway for her child as much as
caution all drivers of this area to slow their speeds due to the nature of the
roadway: She had discussed with Mr. Swanson the "PEDESTRIAN" sign with
the 25 MPH advisory or a "CURVE" sign and thought that either of these
might be possible solutions.
Mr. Swanson stated that he had observed the area but had not conducted a
formal speed survey as the volumes were particularly low. All vehicles he had
covered in a radar survey were within compliance. He felt that either a "DEAF
4
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
CHILD" or "PEDESTRIAN" sign or "CURVE" would be appropriate for the
concerns raised.
Mr. Hoffman cautioned Ms. Hatch that the "PEDESTRIAN" signs would
probably have a lesser impact than the "DEAF CHILD" signs. The "CURVE"
sign might have more impact than the "PEDESTRIAN" sign. Ms. Hatch stated
her preference for the "CURVE" sign.
Mrs. Fuhr moved installation of a "CURVE" sign accompanied by 25 MPH
advisory sign for Parkwood Road. Mr. Bernhjelm seconded the motion.
Motion carried 4 -0.
(4) Request for "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs eastbound and westbound on the
link road between Braemar Boulevard and Valley View Road.
Request made by Robert Perkins, 6009 Dakota Trail.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson stated that vehicles were beginning to use the link road between
Braemar Boulevard and Valley View Road as an overflow parking area
causing a hazardous situation. This happens frequently in the summer
months due to the crowded attendance at the ball fields. He suggested "NO
PARKING" signs in this area.
Mr. Hughes moved to install "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs eastbound
and westbound on the link road between Braemar Boulevard and Valley
View Road. Mr. Bernhjelm seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(5) Request for child warning signs on Mendelssohn Lane.
Request made by Jody Laughlin, 6420 Mendelssohn Lane.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson reviewed the layout of the area. He stated that there is a 90-
degree turn on Mendelssohn and grown foliage somewhat hampers sight
distance through the curve, especially during the spring and summer months.
He suggested curve signage to reduce the speed of vehicles.
Mrs. Fuhr moved installation of a 90- degree "CURVE" sign with a 15 MPH
advisory posted. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
5
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE'8, 1993
(6) Request for an informational neighborhood letter to increase safety and
reduce speed in the area of Biscayne Boulevard and Londonderry Road.
Request made by Bobbi Arnold, 6515 Biscayne Boulevard.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson advised the Committee that the original verbal request of the
residents was for a "STOP" sign. He had surveyed the area and found no
apparent speed or volume problem and also stated that the majority of traffic
was from the immediate area. He had suggested to the requestor that a letter
to the neighborhood advising good traffic safety practices might be
appropriate.
Mr. Hoffman moved that Mr. Swanson work with the requestor to
compose a traffic safety advisory letter for circulation in the area. Mr.
Bernhjelm seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(7) Request for signage for speed control on West 66th Street between Wilryan
Avenue and Ridgeview Drive.
Request made by Caroline Gottsacker, 6540 Tingdale Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson reviewed his surveying of this section of West 66th Street. He
stated that there was, in fact, a speed problem. The 85 percentile speed
proved to be 40 MPH for both eastbound and westbound traffic.
Mr. Hoffman moved to forward this location to the Edina Police
Department's Traffic Enforcement Unit for active enforcement. Mrs. Fuhr
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(8) Request for "STOP" sign at exit of Normandale Golf Course and Parklawn.
Unscheduled agenda request by Mr: Fran Hoffman, City of Edina Engineering
Department.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mrs. Fuhr moved installation of a "STOP" sign at the exit driveway of
Normandale Golf Course and Parklawn. Mr. Bernhjelm seconded the
motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
0
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
(9) Request to review concerns relating to commercial truck traffic on Washington
Avenue in the northwest quadrant of City.
Unscheduled agenda request by Mr. Wade Hemming, 307 Washington
Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hemming had called Mr. Swanson expressing concern regarding the
number of large commercial trucks using Washington Avenue near his
residence. He had asked if there might be some way to ban such traffic.
Mr. Hoffman stated that the majority of truck traffic was from Super Valu and
that the principals of the company had always been willing to work with local
officials regarding any problems resulting from their commercial vehicles.
He suggested to Mr. Swanson that he might contact them to relay Mr.
Hemming's concerns.
Mr. Hughes moved that Mr. Swanson contact Super Valu representatives
to express Mr. Hemming's concerns. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion.
Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
(1) Request for "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign for westbound traffic on Braemar
Boulevard at the link with Valley View Road.
Request made by Robert Perkins, 6009 Dakota Trail.
ACTION TAKEN:
This item was requested along with the "NO PARKING" signs on the link road
by Mr. Perkins. He stated eastbound traffic must wait an extended length of
time before turning left onto Braemar Boulevard for westbound traffic at this
intersection, only to have westbound vehicles turn right onto the link road.
By requiring vehicles to signal a right turn onto the link road, the left turning
vehicles could turn much sooner without fear of being struck by the
occasional vehicle which continues a through pattern on Braemar Boulevard
past the link road intersection. .
7
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
Mr. Bernhjelm stated that he was not in favor of this sign. His concern was
that there was no guarantee that, in fact, drivers would follow this advisory
and it might cause a more hazardous situation. He felt that those making left
turns on Braemar Boulevard to proceed eastbound should do so only when
they were satisfied that they had a clear right -of -way.
Mr. Hughes moved to deny the "SIGNALYOUR TURN' sign for westbound
traffic on Braemar Boulevard at the link with Valley View Road. Mr.
Bernhjelm seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(2) Request for lane striping on the west frontage road of T.H. 100 (Normandale
Road) south of West -66th Street due to parking overflow from Nob Hill Drive.
Continued from May, 1993 meeting. Original request made by Barry Willmert,
6630 Normandale Road.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reviewed this area and what was discussed at the previous
meeting. The City had striped the east side of the east frontage road to
create a bicycle /walkway area because there is not a sidewalk. Mr. Wllmert
thought this was a parking area and, had requested the same striping on the
west frontage road. The matter was continued pending preparation of a
striping layout.
Mr. Hoffman stated that the west frontage road at present had a sidewalk and
two southbound lanes. He suggested the possibility of striping for a turn lane
at Nob Hill Drive thereby forcing traffic to the left and eventually funneling to
one lane. Mr. Hughes questioned if parking was a legitimate problem on the
west side. Mr. Swanson did not feel it was, but asked if there might be any
traffic safety advantages to funneling to one lane. Mr. Bernhjelm also felt that
there was not a defined parking problem.
Mr. Bernhjelm moved to deny lane striping on the west side frontage road
to T.H. 100 based on inconclusive evidence of any parking problem. Mrs.
Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(3) Request to restrict commercial truck traffic from using West 66th Street.
Unscheduled agenda request received from Murray Laub, 6613 Cornelia
Drive.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson stated that Mr. Laub had recently contacted him expressing
concern about the volume of commercial vehicle traffic using West 66th
Street. He had followed such a vehicle from West 66th Street to Metro
Boulevard. When he questioned the driver as to this route, the driver
responded that his dispatcher had advised him to use West 66th Street to
France Avenue to Metro. Mr. Laub advised that he thought West 70th Street
or some other route might be more appropriate for these vehicles.
Mr. Hoffman responded that West 66th Street is a State aid road and
commercial vehicles, therefore, cannot be restricted from using it unless the
weight allowance of the vehicle exceeds the restriction of the roadway. Mr.
Hughes further stated that he would respectfully disagree with the requestor,
as this is the appropriate road classification for this type of vehicle and, in
addition, the impact on West 66th Street would be less than that felt on West
70th Street.
Mr. Hughes moved no action due to the appropriate intra -City usage by
commercial traffic. Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -1.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Request to remove the "NO PARKING ON SUNDAY" signs from West 56th
Street relating to Colony Park Baptist Church, 5532 Wooddale Avenue.
Unscheduled agenda request made by Mrs. Calvin Anderson, 4539 West 56th
Street.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mrs. Anderson had contacted Mr. Swanson asking for removal of these signs.
It was her opinion that the signs were no longer necessary from the Church's
standpoint; therefore the residents would like to again be able to park in the
area. Mr. Swanson stated that a petition had been signed, but only included
approximately 50% of the residents affected. The four property owners who
were directly affected by these signs, however, had all signed the petition for
removal.
0
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1993
Mr. Hughes moved that the matter be continued for one month so that
Mr. Swanson could correspond with the petitioner to ask that all affected
by these signs be contacted before removal. Mr. Hoffman seconded the
motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
10
ch
>' _ O
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Date: JUNE 18, 1993
Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY POLICIES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # ° • c
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
'❑ Resolution
�! Ordinance
Discussion
Recommend adoption of Traffic Safety Policies.
Info /Background:
Traffic Safety policies adopted by the City Council will improve the Traffic
Safety process by clearly communicating standards and expectations to the
citizens as well as providing a reference for the staff and Council.
CITY OF EDINA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 18, 1993
TO: City Council
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
Craig Swanson, Traffic Safety Coordinator
SUBJECT: Traffic Safety Policies
The Traffic Safety Policies before you for review are integral to changes in the
process in handling traffic safety matters. The policies have a two -fold function of
communication and reference. In the traffic safety process, the policies can be used
to communicate with the public on traffic and safety matters with the objective of
more clearly defining issues and seeking solutions. Secondly, the policies become
the reference or standard by which the staff can make recommendations and the
Council can make decisions.
A review of the process with the integration of the policies may be in order:
o Request made by petition, letter, or verbally through a contact person.
Requestor is assisted in clearly formulating the issues, explained the process,
provided the policy, and alternatives are discussed.
o The request then undergoes a traffic safety staff review. The contact person
collects the appropriate data and information and presents it, along with the
information obtained from the requestor. The traffic safety staff review
entertains this information, evaluates it in lieu of adopted policies, and makes a
recommendation to the Council. The contact person communicates the staff
recommendation to the requestor and explains the appeals process which
would take place before the Council or its designated review body.
o The Council, or its designated review body, receives the recommendation and
hears citizen testimony similar to the planning variance process. The Council
can decide the issue based ron its policy at that time or on issues of
widespread interest may want to define an area of notification and schedule a
public hearing. Ultimately, the issue would be decided at a public. meeting.
City Council
June 18, 1993
Page Two
The reasons for the modification of the former Traffic Safety Committee process is the
return of staff persons to a technical review process rather than conducting hearings.
The staff would be permitted to act independently on warning, guide, and
informational signs, however, by statute, regulatory signs must be approved by the
Council.
It is recommended that the policies be adopted and the Council become the appeals
body for a period of six months. Then, Council time and other factors could be
evaluated with the option of forming or assigning the appeals hearing to a different
review body comprised of citizens.
Please review this process and the various Traffic Safety Policies for an agenda item
at the June 21 st meeting.
r;
A. I' =;,
rr C,
;
• ��= bI1,OM'�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
"
From:
Francis HoffmaU
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date:
21 June, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Private Driveway
To Council
Entrance -
The Spaghetti Shop
Action
❑
Motion
4933 France Ave. So.
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Review Issue.
Info /Background:
At the last City Council meeting, a traffic problem was identi-
fied on France Avenue. The problem was traffic stopping to turn
left into a private driveway on southbound France just past West
49� Street. Attached are two pages from the 50th & France Area
Plan in 1974. The circled asterisk indicates problem area. The
second page is a drawing which indicates that parking on France
Avenue should not be allowed. Edina did implement the plan but
later allowed parking on the street to resume.
Staff has talked to the Minneapolis Traffic Engineer and the
Hennepin County Transportation Engineer about the left turn
problem. All parties agree that banning a left turn-into the lot
would not be an appropriate solution. Also, installing signing
not to block street would be hard to expect much enforcement and
therefore, not very effective.
We believe eliminating a couple of parking spaces in front of Art
Dickey and Associates on the west side of France would be the
most effective. City Council may wish to discuss this further
and /or refer to the 50th & France Association for its comments.
no LILJ
C01"WERC1AL AREA PLAN
o Control signage in both Minneapolis and
Edina.
e Screen loading and service facilities.
• Encourage improved maintenance activities.
o Unify area through use of planting, street
and sidewalk improvements, pedestrian
amenities, lighting.
Provide a general improvement to the utility and roadWay
system which will reduce congestion and improve circula-
tion in the business district.
o Vehicular exits and entrances to parking lots
should be eliminated or combined to improve
traffic flow.
® Vehicular and pedestrian movement; should be
separated.
o Loading and service areas should be separated
from traffic and pedest -Hun areas where fe6;i
ble.
0 L'liciir.ate traffic conflicts at 49'? and ;1a1•ifax.
o traffic flow on 50t1r Street and France
Av . nu e.
6 Improve ramp visibility.
o Expand off - street parking facilities on
Hinnaapolis side.
Finance thie redEvelopment of the Project area by use of
tax increment financing methcd and other means available
to the Hous-inq and RedetiF�loprrent .`��.rtho; ity, acting by
itself or in cooperation with do City of Edina so that
the public radevelopn!ent cost of tine project will be paid
within 20 years and so that a long term physical and fiscal
benefit will result.
Implement the plan so that the least disruption to busin`sses,
consumers, and residents occurs tdir-ile purseinq as rapidly
as possible the physical co!!;r,i�tion of fire project.
The above stated goals were develop-2d by the Edina !lousing
and P.edevelupii;ent Authority . -iith participation from ;;I,e
50th and France busir;cssmpn and the Citizens Advisory
Committee avid are cr :nsistar,t with t�-;use adopted by the
Planning Commission or Narch 6, 1968, frrrn the Barton,
Aschman Study of April 14, 1966.
>0
k ac
7'
PROVIDE LANDSCAPE"WAQWR�'
INCREASE INTERSECTION RADII
NO ON STREET PARKING
� Man Man
PARKING
RETAIL 11.90DS.F.
PRO/OFF 1 1,900 S.F.
f . 2XG
LEVE
E IS�I-
T
PARKING
;RETAIL i REDUCE TO
.606S.FR 2 DRIVE
- - _a THROUGH LAI
49 112TH ST.
EVISE INTERSECTION
0 0
OLIMPROVE
■ ENCLOSED
� t ONE-WAYFLOW'
FROM BANK
'7..
IN
PC, ON STREETS T, PARK G ST
0
2 LEVEL; PARKJ
■ A
"sf
Z.
:INCRTSE
INTERSEC ON-
m m
7,
■
m m
V1.1PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER---\
5.000 S.F.
RESIDENTIAL
29,000
. _. _
RESIDENTIAL
Ld
Lo
,.�
x0
,
X
30.00lkS.F.
MAJOR FOCUS
''z
7�P
4iiL
PE BUFFER—O'
. q�-- ' � -` .:Psi; �
®...
®�
PARKING
RETAIL 11.90DS.F.
PRO/OFF 1 1,900 S.F.
f . 2XG
LEVE
E IS�I-
T
PARKING
;RETAIL i REDUCE TO
.606S.FR 2 DRIVE
- - _a THROUGH LAI
49 112TH ST.
1ST FLOOR
RETAIL 15.000
0 0
OLIMPROVE
■ ENCLOSED
-40AFFIC°FLOW
'7..
IN
PC, ON STREETS T, PARK G ST
0
2 LEVEL; PARKJ
■ A
mmmmmun a
■
WIN a man In
■
man
■
RETAIL ■
6-000 S F
5.000 S.F.
RESIDENTIAL
29,000
S.F.
_y
x
MAJOR FOCUS
PARKING
RETAIL 11.90DS.F.
PRO/OFF 1 1,900 S.F.
f . 2XG
LEVE
E IS�I-
T
PARKING
;RETAIL i REDUCE TO
.606S.FR 2 DRIVE
- - _a THROUGH LAI
a OPEN WALKWAYS
Man -ANDSCAPE
FMAN DESIGN
H:l 50th & FRANCE 'DESTRIAN SPACES
COMMERCIAL AREA PLAN
I- S�
Mal
. �tr
z
YN09 LEFT TURNS
1ST FLOOR
RETAIL 15.000
2ND FLOOR
PR OFF. 15.000,S.F.
OPTION:CLOSE
HAUFA
'417
'7..
IN
PC, ON STREETS T, PARK G ST
REALIGN. STREET &
TAPER TO IMPROVE SITE LINE-
uj
RESIDENTIAL
29,000
S.F.
x
13 -15 UNITS
''z
7�P
4iiL
PE BUFFER—O'
ENCLOSED WALKWAYS
a OPEN WALKWAYS
Man -ANDSCAPE
FMAN DESIGN
H:l 50th & FRANCE 'DESTRIAN SPACES
COMMERCIAL AREA PLAN
I- S�
Mal
. �tr
z
YN09 LEFT TURNS
'73
. 4
7
L
NO OW STREET PA I I'?
-zi -
will -72 Y. 1 is
I Lily
1ST FLOOR
RETAIL 15.000
2ND FLOOR
PR OFF. 15.000,S.F.
'73
. 4
7
L
NO OW STREET PA I I'?
-zi -
will -72 Y. 1 is
I Lily
e4 �
• ,V�bRPOMt�v •
iBeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
I
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item ##
V.E
From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
. Consent
E
j
Information Only
U
Date: JUNE 18, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject: HONEYWELL ENERGY SAVINGS
E
To Council
PROGRAM
Action
ZI
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
ix
Discussion
Recommendation:
Council authorization for signing a Letter of Intent with Honeywell, Inc. to
proceed with the next step in the process.
Info /Background:
Attached is information submitted by Honeywell, Inc. relating to their energy
savings program for the City's buildings following the Council's authorization
by resolution on October 19, 1992 to proceed with the first step of evaluating
the City's facilities as to feasibility.
The next step in the process is for the Council to determine if it wishes -to
proceed after discussing and reviewing the cost estimates submitted by Honeywell.
If the Council decides to proceed with the program it.should authorize
execution of a Letter of Intent.
I feel the concept and the savings to be realized are good and would recommend
moving ahead with the program. The Council will have one more opportunity to
make a final judgement before a contract is authorized and signed.
Honeywell
Honeywell Inc.
7171 Ohms Ln
Edina N-IN 55.139
612951 -1000
June 17, 1993
Ken Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
Enclosed you will find the items we discussed for the council meeting on June 21.
• Current Cost Analysis
• Retrofit Descriptors
• Background Paper
• Letter of Intent
• Questions and Answers Regarding Program
We are looking forward to a continued successful partnership.
Best regards,
Susan 'Nelson Alex Bisbee
Account Representative Account Representative
Home & Building Control Home & Building Control
(612) 830 -3766 (612) 830 -7596
Cost of Operations
for
All Three Funds
91 -92
Utilities $869,092
Administrative $139420
Repairs, Supplies & Materials $19,749
Expected Capital Projects $359394
TOTAL 154 655
Cost of Operations
for
Edinborough Park &Centennial Lakes
91 -92
Utilities
Administrative
Repairs, Supplies & Materials
Expected Capital Projects
TOTAL
$21,154
$3,180
$7,425
$5,183
36 42
Fund 30 - Edinborough Park
* Install Pool Cover
Natural gas, electrical, water and chemical savings from installation of
pool cover to be used during unoccupied hours.
* Ozone Generator
Purification of pool water using ozone generator results in reduced
chemical costs, reduced chemical smells and effects, and reduced water
staining of pool surface.
* Heat Reclaim on Rink Chiller
Recapture heat generated by ice refrigeration system for electrical and
natural gas energy savings.
* Variable Frequency Drives
Substantial electrical savings resulting from variable speed control of
pool pump motor and AHU fan motors.
* Lighting Retrofit
Reduction of electrical usage and energy costs through installation of
high eficiency fluorescent lamps and ballasts.
Cost of Operations
for
Golf Course
91 -92
Utilities
Administrative
Repairs, Supplies & Materials
Expected Capital Projects
TOTAL
$24,951
$4,100
$2,738
$4,815
36 604
CITY OF EDINA - ENERGY RETROFIT PACKAGE
Fund 27 - Braemar Club House /Golf Dome
Club House
* Energy Management System
Automate all club house heating, ventilating and air conditioning,
temperature and humidity controls; resulting in substantial energy and
operational savings.
* Lighting Retrofit
Reduction of electrical usage and energy costs through installation of
high efficiency fluorescent lamps and ballasts.
* Variable Frequency Drives
Substantial electrical savings resulting from variable speed control of air
handler motors.
* Mechanical Retrofits
Additional natural gas and electrical savings from high efficiency
retrofits to existing HVAC equipment. Retrofits include:
- Outside air control
* Power Factor Correction
Restore power factor to 90% or above, avoid substantial NSP billing
penalties.
Fund 27 - Braemar Club House /Golf Dome
Golf Dome
* Energy Management System
Automate all dome heating and ventilation, temperature and dome
pressurization controls; resulting in substantial energy and operational
savings.
* Ductwork
Install heating ductwork to better distribute heated air throughout tee
area, resulting in lowered heating energy bills.
* Variable Frequency Drive
Substantial electrical savings resulting from variable speed control of air
handler motor.
* Power Factor Correction
Restore power factor to 90% or above, avoid substantial NSP billing
penalties.
Cost of Operations
for
Ice Arena
91 -92
Utilities
Administrative
Repairs, Supplies & Materials
Expected Capital Projects
TOTAL
$39,987
$6,140
$9,586
$25,397
81 110
Fund 28 - Braemar Ice Arena
* Energy Management System
Automate all arena heating, ventilating and air conditioning, temperature
and humidity and ice refrigeration controls; resulting in substantial
energy and operational savings.
* Aluma -zorb Ceiling
Substantial reduction of radiated heat load to ice results in refrigeration
energy savings. Enhanced rink aesthetics and light levels on ice.
* Replace Boiler
Replace over - sized, aged boiler with high efficiency new gas -fired unit,
gaining natural gas savings.
* Insulate West Arena Attic Space
Upgrade attic insulation from R4 to R38, results in both gas and
electrical energy savings.
* Variable Frequency Drives
Substantial electrical savings resulting from variable speed control of
primary electrical motors.
* Lighting Retrofit
Reduction of electrical usage and energy costs through installation of
high efficiency fluorescent lamps and ballasts.
* Low Flow Shower Heads
Realize natural gas and water savings by replacing exising shower heads
with low flow fixtures.
* Insulate Hot Water Piping
Replace missing and damaged insulation on hot water pipes to minimize
heat loss and realize natural gas savings.
* Install Draft T on Water Heater
Reduce natural gas usage with high efficiency retrofit to existing water
heating system.
Honeywell
Honeywell Inc.
7171 Ohms Ln
Edina MN 55139
612 951 -1000
BACKGROUND
TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBJECT: HONEYWELL MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROPOSAL
DATE: JUNE 17, 1993
On September 30, 1992, the City department heads had a presentation by
representatives from Honeywell on their Municipal Services Program. The proposal, at
that time, was that Honeywell would conduct a preliminary study of the City buildings'
HVAC, structural and lighting systems, and make recommendations to reduce the
consumption of energy and operational costs.
On October 19, 1992, the City Council passed a resolution authorizing the City
Manager to sign a letter authorizing Honeywell as the vendor of choice to negotiate a
Municipal Services Contract. The results of Honeywell's evaluation and
recommendations are proprietary and cannot be used for other purposes.
On November 16, 1992, Honeywell, in conjunction with the City Manager, held a
kick -off meeting for all individuals assisting in the Honeywell Energy Program.
Subsequently, the City and Honeywell chose three funds, 27, 28, and 29, as the initial
area of investigation.
Upon completion of these three funds, Honeywell will enter into the second study
phase of the Honeywell Municipal Program encompassing the City's remaining
facilities and parks.
Comprehensive surveys of the three funds have been completed along with an extensive
analysis of the cost and savings associated with the program. These costs and savings
have been thoroughly documented and validated from the City's ledgers and finance
department.
Honeywell's preliminary proposal concentrates on the highest energy and operational
payback retrofits along with a comprehensive ongoing maintenance component. The
retrofit portion of the program will be completed in a six month construction period.
All savings will be guaranteed for the life of the program validated by Honeywell's
energy audit. The retrofits and maintenance not only address savings, but also address
extensive comfort and environmental issues, which have high priority in the enterprise
funds.
PAGE 2
The next step in the process is for the City Council to determine if the material
presented in the preliminary report justifies further action. If the answer to that
question is "yes ", then there needs to be a Letter of Intent from the City to Honeywell
indicating that the City wishes to have a final in -depth analysis done along with the
preparation of contract documents.
Enclosed is a Letter of Intent. This letter indicates that if the final in -depth analysis
produces costs and savings within a five percent deviation that the City intends to
follow through with a contract.
LETTER OF INTENT
Susan Nelson
Honeywell, Inc.
7171 Ohms Lane
Edina, MN 55439
Dear Susan:
The City of Edina has reviewed the Honeywell Municipal Services Program. We
would like to have Honeywell perform the program outlined in the attached proposal
and achieve the savings in the manner proposed therein.
The City Council authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement
with Honeywell for the Honeywell Municipal Services Program Phase One based upon
the following criteria:
Honeywell to perform an in -depth survey and engineering study and arrange the
contractual and financial documentation.
The in -depth survey and engineering study determines that the final cost will
represent the findings in the preliminary proposal within a 5 % deviation.
Contracts to be presented to the City Manager by with his
approval no later than
The City Council also authorizes the City Manager to enter into the second study phase
of the Honeywell Municipal Program encompassing the City's remaining facilities and
parks:. The goal is to determine the feasibility and cost of the program as outlined in
Phase One and enter into an agreement, if the Second Phase meets the requirements of
the legislation and the City.
Sincerely,
City of Edina
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
ABOUT
THE HONEYWELL PARTNERSHIP
1. What are the objectives of this partnership?
The City and Honeywell have spent a great deal of time determining
mutual objectives that serve as a framework for this partnership
agreement. The City Administration involved in the first phase of
this project believes that there are real benefits for the city. Some
key benefits include:
• Cost Avoidance programs for ongoing operations and energy
budgets
• Infrastructure Renovation. Helping us provide a
comfortable environment
• Added funding and alternative funding for renovations.
Honeywell Capital through a lease purchase agreement
for the improvements
• Guarantees of performance for cost avoidance
Honeywell Corp. backing of a 100% guarantee of all cost
avoidance dollars
• Staff training and maintenance of infrastructure
technology
2. Why choose Honeywell?
Honeywell has the best track record.
Honeywell is a locally based company who is committed to the local
economy. Annually, Honeywell, through its foundations, contributes
millions of dollars to local non - profit socially beneficial
organizations.
• Nationally Honeywell has
Guarantees annually.
• Professional Organization
municipalities.
over $350 million in Cost Avoidance
of over 154 people dedicated only to
• Professional project management and TQM processes to be used for
the City of Edina
e Use of best and most current technology to minimize ongoing costs.
• Professional engineering staff dedicated to the cities objectives
3. Why are we doing this?
Due to the financial constraints and our limited resources, there is
no feasible way that we can accomplish these goals by ourselves. A
business /municipal partnership represents additional resources we
will have available to help our staff to be efficient as possible. A
business /municipal partnership will leverage our resources. It is a
widely recognized way to help us implement our programs given the
tight budgetary and funding constraints. We are constantly being
asked to provide more services to our community without means or
incentives to meet these needs. Being able to provide a self- funding,
guaranteed program that will significantly upgrade our facilities and
saving money makes good sense. We as a City have a civic
responsibility to be as resource conscious and energy efficient as
possible; a partnership with Honeywell will help.
4. Why is this a good deal?
Capital Improvements
We will be receiving $650,000 of desired capital improvements.without
having to provide up -front capital and $65,000 per year of service
assistance. We are funding this with a combination of Utility
Savings, Operational Savings, Future Capital dollars that we had
planned on spending on such renovations, all of which is 100%
financially guaranteed by Honeywell.
Expertise & Resources
We will have the ongoing services and expertise of Honeywell to draw
from in order to assist our own efforts. This expertise will provide
assurance that key equipment efficiencies and operation will be
maximized throughout the term of our partnership. We will be able to
use Honeywell resources on a consultative basis in addition to their
active support in implementing the objectives of the partnership we
feel are so important.
Perception as Leaders Focused on Outcome
The public perception of the City as a leader focused on Quality will
be enhanced by having a business partner with Honeywell's stature,
reputation and resources. Any one of the partnership objects clearly
shows the City's commitment to sound fiscal management. The fact
that our buildings will be assured for ten years to use as little
energy as possible and maintain comfort is only one example of sound
fiscal management.
5. Have we checked references?
Yes we have, and we found excellent satisfaction from each reference.
We have incorporated their comments into our partnership agreement to
assure ourselves of having the best possible level of service.
6. How is it the contract funded?
The agreement is a self- funding program totaling $154,655 annually.
Our sources of this self- funding program include dollars reallocated
from:
Utility
$86,092
Repairs, Supplies &
$19,749
Materials
Administrative
$13,420
Expected Capital
$35,394
Projects
Total $154,655
7. What is the cost?
Keeping in mind that this is a self- funded program our costs are
covered by the cost avoidance generated by the improvements, and the
cost is guaranteed by Honeywell. Our annual payments are as follows:
Lease Purchase $89,325
Service Agreement $65,330
Total $154,655
r
10. What is the effect on our future budgets?
This amount represents items included in the capital improvements for
this program that we have a history of having to expend and would
have been forced to implement anyway. We will benefit from these
items immediately rather than deferring the benefit into the future.
We also avoid the risk of not doing these important improvements due
to future uncertainties. We get them done now—Additionally, we will
avoid paying a higher price by doing them now rather than paying
higher future costs due to inflation on these capital items. We also
will receive a guarantee for the energy and operational costs these
items will-save.
11. What is in this for Honeywell?
Honeywell has a Corporate responsibility to society implied in its
corporate mission. By forming partnerships such as this, Honeywell
increases its shareholder value by better achieving its mission.
Honeywell will also receive profit from the portion of the products
and services that they supply to the City of Edina. It is a
reasonable approach given that all of the products and service we
receive from our sources have profit in them. But none have the
commitment and benefit of this mutual partnership.
12. Why now?
The City and Honeywell have worked together on this partnership since
last November. Hundreds of hours of planning, analyzing and
negotiating the best partnership possible have been mutually
contributed by the City and Honeywell. The administration is
committed to this exciting opportunity for our City. The City Council
has voted to negotiate a partnership with Honeywell. The
administration supports the implementation of the partnership and its
objectives. Given the current low cost of money and the
comprehensive program content, this partnership makes good financial
and business sense to begin now.
13. What is the risk or down side?
There is no down side to this partnership. It is an excellent example
of local business and local govnerment teaming together. We are both
committed to making this successful. We have a financial guarantee,
auditing procedures, and the ongoing expertise of Honeywell to assist
us. Honeywell has a down side if the guarantee is not made.
14. Will there be lay -offs as a result of this?
There will be no lay -offs as result of this Honeywell partnership.
This program will also free up some of our personnel to do more of
the tasks for which they were hired.
e" W
R 0
� �NCbHet10MSSV •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To. COUNCIL MEMBERS
Agenda Item ##
v.G
From: FRED RICHARDS, MAYOR
Consent
Information Only
L
Date: JUNE 18, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject: APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY
❑
To Council
HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
Action
;J
Motion
Resolution
'-
Ordinance
C
Discussion
Recommendation:
Appointment of Dr. Sharon Marx to the Community Health Services Advisory
Committee, with the consent of the Council, to fill an unexpired term to
February 1, 1994.
Info /Background
I am recommend appointment of Dr. Sharon Marx, 5525 Mirror Lakes Drive, to
fill the un- expired term of Dr. Bryan Colwell who has resigned from the
Committee.
Dr. 11arx practices in the field of geriatrics and should be a good addition
to the Committee.
{ AGENDA ITEM V.H
y
350 PARE AVENUE
."W YORE. NEW YORE 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202)857 -0700
3 GRACECHURCH STREET
LONDON RC3V OAT, ENGLAND
44 -71- 929 -3334
36. RUE THONCHET
78009 PARIS, PRANCE
33. 1-42-66-59 -49
35 SQUARE DE MEE69
R -1040 BRUSSELS, BBLOIUM
32- 2- 504 -46-11
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
DOIRSEY & WHITNEY
A Pia ...=P 1—L... PsoP6s .— CoaPO—t —
220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -1498
( 612) 340-2600
TELEX 29-0605
FAX (612) 340-2868
Re: Open Meeting Law
Dear Mr. Rosland:
JMWMZ P. GIUMAN
(6= 340-2962
April 13, 1993
201 FIRST AVENUE. S. W.. SUITE 340
ROCHBSTBR.MD:NBSOTA 55902
(507) 288 -3156
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS. MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
507 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS. MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406)721-6025
801 GRAND. SUITE 3900
DES MOINES, IOWA 50309
(515) 263 -1000
You have asked for our opinion concerning when gatherings of
members of the City Council constitute a meeting under the Minnesota Open
Meeting Law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.705).
The Open Meeting Law provides that, subject to certain exceptions, all
meetings, including executive sessions, of any state agency, board, commission or
department when required or permitted by law to transact public business in a
meeting, and the governing body of any school district however organized,
unorganized territory, county, city, town or other public body, and of any committee,
subcommittee, board, department or commission thereof, shall be open to the
public. The Open Meeting Law requires that notice of any meeting be given as
provided in the Law, and that any agenda material which is distributed to, or made
available to the members of the governing body at the meeting, be available in the
meeting room for inspection by the public.
Any person who violates the Open Meeting Law is subject to personal
liability in the form of a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $100 per
occurrence, and upon a third violation a violator is subject to loss of office.
The Open Meeting Law does not contain a definition of what
constitutes a "meeting." In Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, 336 NW
2d 510 (Minn. 1983), the Minnesota Supreme Court formulated a comprehensive.
P
1
DoBSEY & WHITNEY
Page -2-
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
April 13, 1993
definition of what constitutes a meeting under the Open Meeting Law. In Moberg,
the Minnesota Supreme Court held that "meetings" subject to the requirements of
the Open Meeting Law are those gatherings of at least a quorum or more of
members of the governing body, or quorum of a committee, subcommittee, board,
department, or commission thereof, at which members discuss, decide or receive
information as a group on issues relating to official business of that governing body.
The Court went on to say that although "chance or social gatherings" are exempt
from the requirements of the Open Meeting Law, a quorum may not, as a group,
discuss or receive information on official business in any setting under the guise of
a private social gathering. The Court also stated that the Open Meeting Law does
not apply to letters or telephone conversations between fewer than a quorum.
While the interpretation of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Moberg
of what constitutes a "meeting" focused on the gathering of a quorum, the Court
went on to state that "serial meetings in groups of less than a quorum for the
purposes of avoiding public hearings or fashioning agreement on an issue may also
be found to be a violation of the statute depending upon the facts of the individual
case."
In summary, based on the Moberg case, a meeting of a quorum or more
of members of the City Council, or any board or commission thereof, at which
members discuss, decide or receive information as a group on issues relating to the
official business of the City is subject to the requirements of the Open Meeting Law.
The following are not meetings subject to the Open Meeting Law:
(a) gathering of less than a quorum if not for the purpose of
avoiding puuiic bearings or fashioning agreement on
issues to be decided at a public hearing; .
(b) chance or social gatherings (even if a quorum is present),
so long as not a guise for members to discuss, decide or
receive information as a group on issues related to official
business; and
(c) letters or telephone conversations between fewer than a
quorum.
In Moberg, the Minnesota Supreme Court left open the possibility that
meetings of less than a quorum may be subject to the Open Meeting Law if for the
purpose of avoiding public hearings or fashioning agreement on issues to be decided
r�
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Page -3-
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
April 13, 1993
at a public hearing. Such a finding would depend on the facts of the case and
whether there was a pattern of actions intended to evade the purposes of the Open
Meeting Law. In its discussion in Moberg of when meetings of less than a quorum
may constitute a meeting subject to the Open Meeting Law, the Minnesota Supreme
Court seemed to distinguish between meetings of less than a quorum "to persuade
each other in an attempt to resolve issues," which meetings would not be subject to
the Open Meeting Law, and meetings of less than a quorum "to forge a majority in
advance of public.hearing on an issue, which meetings may be subject to the Open
Meeting Law. How a court would apply this distinction in a given factual situation
is difficult to predict.
Should you have any further questions concerning this matter, please
advise me.
Yours truly,
%; Jero a P. Gilli$a
JPG:cmn _
e
v /�'ke.�ow.•'
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman,4,4�v/
Dir. of Public Works
Date: 21 June, 1993
Agenda Item # v',,
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: Joint Powers a To Council
Agreements
with Bloomington and Action x❑ Motion
Eden Prairie
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Recommendation:
Concept approval for the joint powers agreements with Eden
Prairie and Bloomington.
Info /Background:
City staff has been working with Bloomington and Eden Prairie on
two joint power agreements involving public facilities on border
streets with each city.
The first agreement is with Eden Prairie involving Washington
Avenue west of Highway 169 (old County Road 18). Currently, Eden
Prairie maintains the street and storm sewer with appropriate
cross sharing of construction costs, if construction is required.
The traffic signal at Valley View Road and Washington is main-
tained by Eden Prairie and Edina pays the electrical costs. The
other two utilities, water and sewer, are currently maintained by
Edina serving both Edina, Eden Prairie and one parcel in
Bloomington.
The proposed change would be to have Eden Prairie take over all
maintenance of public systems on Washington Avenue, except for
sewer service to the Braun Intertec building on the east side of
Washington. The staff believes the reasons for the change are
all positive for Edina. The water provided to the small industry
along Washington would be provided softened water thus causing
Report /Recommendation
Agenda Item V.I.
21 June, 1993
Page Two
less aggressive water problems in the plumbing system. Edina
would have one less sanitary sewer lift station to maintain and
lose a current customer (on the Eden Prairie side) who has caused
discharge problems in the system. Also, our sewer discharge into
the metro sewer interceptor into Richfield would be less. This
capacity concern was a very large issue during the Centennial
Lakes development. Finally, on Washington Avenue, the question
of which City maintains the system would be resolved for mainte-
nance personnel.
The second agreement being worked on is with Bloomington involv-
ing Minnesota Drive from Edinborough Way east of France Avenue to
Johnson Drive west of France Avenue. The agreement has the
following elements as it relates to the street, storm sewer and
utilities.
Minnesota Drive (east of France) would be maintained by Edina
with Edina serving as the water and sewer utility to the parcel
on the south side of Minnesota Drive just west of Edinborough
Way.
Minnesota Drive (west of France) would be maintained by
Bloomington to include small lateral storm sewers intercepting
the main storm sewer line. Edina would maintain the large pipe
servicing primarily the Centennial Lakes project and the souther-
ly area of Southdale which drains to Centennial Lakes.
The third element of the agreement would be to assess National
Car Rental for a portion of the Minnesota Drive road work west of
France thru common agreement with National Car Rental. Addition-
ally, also pay to Bloomington, a portion of the cost of the main
storm sewer constructed to service the Centennial Lakes site and
the southerly Southdale area. The proposal is to split the cost
approximately 50 -50 for just the main pipe cost under Minnesota
Drive. Staff would anticipate that the cost would be approxi-
mately $60,000.00 which would be financed from our utility fund.
This agreement would then finalize all different elements
involving Minnesota Drive. Some of these issues relate back to
the development of the Homart site.
Staff will present a series of overhead charts to depict the
proposed changes on both Washington Avenue and Minnesota Drive at
the Council Meeting Monday evening.
AGENDA"ITEM VI.A
- 17-93
�c�? ��' � �cKyc•; I
f �5kz
z �V it i
411 j -
6 4.1 t- /VC j <-C-4Y C t
Q(k T� iv r4'77�— C.
Cc, v� ti��Y rr
s t � �
/0 `t 7-P, `r-� f r �C� I �i �0 1r r j r 4—Y
r
--2- Tc(S o �e-� t k t yC tc �— �/ O� e
C -r
Ll
2`tel
/Y
L
�c✓iLl 2 % 5
Z V-,-�7 C'�� .�� 7� ��v�
r V r cJ
4
5
r
;r.,
V �' i 1F� ��'
r i S ✓vc z{
vl ?v ���
J
�- (^ 1 r �✓
C'�' uI r Ir l / c�-�
u r is r trr
7
y r, w
r-.z -sc-YS
J
Cc--4 S
c 4 v—
y
Lv-
rcNil
Fy -q-,� F4.
A V,
AGENDA ITEM VI.B
June 17, 1993
Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Edina School Board
c/o District Administration
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Handicap Accessibility at Kuhlman Field
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Excess tax increment monies should have been used to remove
barriers at the Kuhlman Field bleachers. I was surprised by the
Sun Newspaper report of your vote. Federal standards and
regulations pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
require removal of barriers to a common seating area in the
bleachers.
Presently, there is access to the field, but no access to
the bleachers. Anyone in a wheelchair or unable to climb stairs
must sit apart because there is no ramp or lift.
Let me be clear. Pursuant to the ADA and the Accessibility
Gu Weii.nes for Facilities an "accessible route" is a continuous
unobstructed path connecting all accessible elements and spaces
of a building or facility . . . Exterior accessible routes may
include . . . ramps and lifts."
The ADA requires a public accommodation to take whatever
affirmative steps are necessary to ensure that no individual with
a disability is segregated or otherwise treated differently
unless the burden is undue or the nature of the facility is
fundamentally altered. The ADA is violated if there is failure
to remove barriers structural in nature, in existing facilities.
Ramps are an example of compliance that is presumed achievable
pursuant to the ADA. (See ADA Accessibility Guidelines, Federal
Register, Vol. 56, No. 144 7/26/91).
June 17, 1993
Page 2
Satisfying the ADA and its regulations for removing barriers
is not casual elective, simply good politics or comparable to
need for resurfacing a gym floor or improving a press box.
Compliance with the Accessibility Guidelines is Federal law.
Kuhlman bleachers are a public accommodation and are not in
compliance with Federal law.
If this issue is subject to serious dispute, I would be
pleased to make a presentation upon request. However, the
likelihood is that your attorneys and engineers are well versed
on the requirements and perhaps, you are too, but need a
reminder. This is not a new or unfamiliar standard of Federal
policy.
The gate allowing wheelchair bound or persons of limited
ambulation to enter the facility does not comply with the
requirement to remove barriers to the bleachers. Eden Prairie's
and Hopkin's facilities should be compared to Kuhlman's facility.
Eden Prairie and Hopkins are in compliance; Kuhlman is not.
If you can or will reconsider use of excess tax increment
monies or have some other plan to correct the problem, I applaud
the effort. Obviously, I would appreciate a short letter in the
next sixty days summarizing your plan and timetable for removal
of barriers at Kuhlman Field bleachers.
A plan that allows grandparents, wheelchair bound and others
of impaired ambulation to be "part of the group" in the stands is
Edina's community spirit and Federal law. As you might suspect,
I have mentioned my concern about this casually and informally to
administrators in the past. This letter is a more formal
approach to what appears to be a confusion or misunderstanding or
forgetfulness of our real priorities.
Thank you very much.
GCR:las
Since ,
C
ary C. Reiter
5316 Birchcrest Drive
Edina, MN 55436
Tel. No. 929 -6230
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM X.A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Jerry Gilligan
DATE: June 16, 1993
RE: Vernon Terrace Revenue Bonds
In 1990, the City issued its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990 (the "1990 Bonds ") to refund bonds issued by
the City in 1986 to finance the construction of Vernon Terrace Apartments. The
1990 Bonds are limited obligations of the City and are payable from loan repayments
to be made by the owner of Vernon Terrace Apartments. The documents for the
1990 Bonds provide that on July 1, 1993 all of the 1990 Bonds are to be tendered by
the holders thereof for purchase (subject to the right of such holders to elect to
return such bonds). On July 1, 1993, the tendered 1990 Bonds are to be remarketed
and the interest rate on the 1990 Bonds adjusted to an interest rate established by
Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., the remarketing agent for the 1990 Bonds.
Vernon Terrace Apartments is presently owned by Ohmega Building
Corporation, a corporation wholly owned by Electrical Workers Local No. 292
Annuity Plan and Electrical Workers Local 292 Pension Plan. I have been informed
that Ohmega Building Corporation has agreed to sell Vernon Terrace Apartments to
a Mr. Ted Bigos, or an entity formed by Mr. Bigos.
Ohmega Building Corporation and Mr. Bigos have requested that in
conjunction with the remarketing of the 1990 Bonds on July 1st, the City approve
certain amendments to the Loan Agreement and Indenture of Trust for the 1990
Bonds. The proposed amendments will (i) adjust the principal' repayment schedule
for the 1990 Bonds, (ii) permit the owner to make semiannual loan repayments,
instead of monthly payments, and (iii) authorize a sale of Vernon Terrace
Apartments, subject to the mortgage securing the 1990 Bonds.
I have reviewed drafts of the proposed First Amendment to Loan Agreement
and First Supplemental Indenture of Trust and they appear to be in order, and do
not affect the limited obligation of the City with respect to the 1990 Bonds. Attached
for consideration by the City Council is a form of resolution approving the
execution and delivery of the First Amendment to Loan Agreement and First
Supplemental Indenture of Trust, together with drafts of such documents and
information submitted by representatives of Vernon Terrace Apartments.
JG:mev
Attachments
DORSEY & WHITNEY
.\ 1'.�K'1'N F:K.illll• INI'1.1'l II NII I'NIIt't_YYIIIN. \I. l'11Hi•UN,.•1'lllNH
VERNON TERRACE BACKGROUND
In December, 1986 the City of Edina issued its
Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace
Project) in the principal amount of $12,600,000 to refund
previously issued bonds of the City, the proceeds of which were
escrowed. Upon issuance of the 1986 Bonds transferred proceeds
of the original bond issue were loaned to Grandview Development
Company Limited Partnership for the purpose of financing the
acquisition and construction of Vernon Terrace Apartments.
As a result of slower than expected lease -up, lower
than expected occupancy, and other factors, the original borrower
defaulted with respect to the 1986 Bonds.
With court approval, a settlement was reached with the
original borrower for partial payment. Such settlement was
funded by proceeds of a loan to a subsequent purchaser of the
apartment project, Ohmega Building Corporation. This loan was
funded by proceeds from the sale in 1990 of the City's
Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace
Project) Series 1990. This loan (and the 1990 bonds) are secured
by a mortgage on the project.
The subsequent owner, Ohmega Building Corporation, is
wholly owned by Electrical Workers Local No. 292 Annuity Plan and
Electrical Workers Local No. 292 Pension Plan. The Pension Plan
originally guaranteed through July 1, 1993, 7516 of the payments
due on the Bonds and the Annuity Plan guaranteed the remaining
2516.
All 1990 Bonds are required to be tendered by
bondholders on July 1, 1993 (subject to the right of holders to
elect to retain such bonds). On such date the bonds will.be
remarketed and the interest rate on the bonds will be adjusted to
a market price established by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc.
as Remarketing Agent. Such new interest rate is expected to be
in effect for three years, with the bonds being subject to a
mandatory tender requirement on July 1, 1996.
Ohmega Building Corporation has agreed to sell the
apartment project to Mr. Ted Bigos. Upon such sale, Ohmega
Building Corporation will continue to be obligated to pay the
bonds until July 1, 2008 or earlier payment in full. The.new
owner will purchase the project, subject to the Bond mortgage.
Additionally, the Pension Plan and Annuity Plan will extend their
guarantee with respect to the Bonds through at least the next
mandatory tender date.
Ohmega Building Corporationis requesting the City to
approve certain amendments to the bond - related documents to (i)
eliminate principal payments otherwise due on or before July 1,
1996, (ii) adjust sinking fund redemption payments or principal
maturities scheduled to occur on or after July 1, 1996, (iii)
permit Bonds to be called for redemption without a deposit of
funds (so long as the Plan's guaranty is in effect); (iv) permit
the borrower to make semi - annual loan repayments, instead of
monthly repayments; and (v) authorize the sale of the project,
subject to the Bond mortgage.
MFF(7E14. WP5
CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
The undersigned, as City Clerk of the City of Edina,
Minnesota (the "City ") hereby certifies as follows:
Attached hereto is •a true and correct copy of a
resolution of the City Council of the City, on file and of record
in the offices of the City, which resolution was adopted by the
City Council on June 7, 1993, at a meeting open to the public duly
called and held in accordance with applicable law at which a quorum
was present throughout. Council member moved the
adoption of the attached resolution and council member
seconded the motion. A vote being taken on the motion, the
following council members voted in favor of the resolution:
and the following council members voted against the resolution:
The following council members were absent from the meeting:
DATED: June , 1993.
City Clerk
MFF07D88. WP5
RESOLUTION
APPROVING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF FIRST
SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT
AND AUTHORIZING OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO MULTIFAMILY
MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (VERNON TERRACE PROJECT)
SERIES 1990.
Whereas, pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of
July 1, 1990 ( "Indenture ") between the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the "City ") and First Trust National Association, as trustee (the
"Trustee"), the City issued its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990 (the "Bonds ") ,
which were secured by a certain Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and
Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement dated as
of July 1, 1990 (the "Mortgage "); and
Whereas, proceeds from the sale of the Bonds were loaned
to Ohmega Building Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Prior
Company ") , pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of July 1, 1990
(the "Loan Agreement") for the purpose of refunding prior bonds of
the City issued to finance the acquisition and construction of a
multifamily rental housing facility located in the City and known
as Vernon Terrace Apartments (the "Project "); and
Whereas, the Bonds are subject to mandatory tender and
purchase on July 1, 1993 (the "Mandatory Tender Date "); and
Whereas, the Company contemplates the sale of the Project
to Ted Bigos, who proposes to acquire the Project subject to the
Mortgage;
Whereas, in connection with the proposed sale of the
Project and the Mandatory Tender Date the Company has requested
amendments to the Indenture and Loan Agreement pursuant to a
proposed First Supplemental Indenture of Trust (the "Supplemental
Indenture ") and a proposed First Amendment to Loan Agreement (the
"Loan Agreement Amendment ") , respectively, each proposed agreement
being dated as of July 1, 1993 and on file with the City Clerk; and
Whereas, the City has. been advised that the foregoing
amendments are permitted by the Indenture;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. The form of each of the Supplemental Indenture and
Loan Agreement Amendment on file are hereby approved. The Mayor
and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute in
the name of and on behalf of the City the Supplemental Indenture
and Loan Agreement, as such documents may be completed, amended or
modified and approved by such officials, which approval shall be
deemed conclusively given upon execution of such documents by the
officials; provided however, that on the date of such execution
Bond Counsel shall have delivered all opinions in connection
therewith that are required by the Indenture to be delivered on or
before such date.
MFF07D88. WP5
2. In the absence of
the documents authorized by this
those persons who are permitted
such officials.
the foregoing officials, any of
Resolution shall be executed by
by law to act in the absence of
3. Upon the request of the Company, and subject to the
approval of legal counsel to the City, the Supplemental Indenture
shall be modified (a) to cause the Mandatory Tender Date (as
defined in the Indenture) next occurring after July 1, 1993 to be
that interest payment date for the Bonds which shall be designated
by the Company, but no later than July 1, 1996, and (b) to
establish the interest rate to. be borne by the Bonds on July 1,
1993 as the rate designated by the Company, but not to exceed 501
per annum.
4. The Mayor, City Manager and other officers of the
City are authorized to approve and furnish, execute or deliver such
other certifications, documents or instruments as Mackall, Crounse
& Moore, as bond counsel, shall require, including such instruments
as may be required for federal tax law purposes.
5. This resolution shall become effective as of the
date and time of its adoption.
Adopted: June , 1993.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
MFFO'7D88.WP5 - 2 -
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT dated July 1, 1993
between the City of Edina, Minnesota, a political subdivision of
the State of Minnesota (the "City ") and Ohmega Building
Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, (the "Company ")..
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Loan Agreement dated as of
July 1, 1990 (the "Loan Agreement ") between the Company and the
City of Edina, Minnesota (the "Issuer "), the Issuer loaned to the
Company sale proceeds of the Issuer's Mortgage Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990 in the original
aggregate principal amount of $6,735,000 (the "Bonds "); and
. WHEREAS, the Company has requested amendments to the Loan
Agreement as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the Loan Agreement is permitted to be amended
pursuant to Article IX of the Indenture of Trust securing the Bonds
(the "Indenture "); and
WHEREAS, the Company has requested the Issuer to enter
into a First Supplemental Indenture of Trust (the "Supplemental
Indenture ") amending the terms of the Indenture, and the
Supplemental Indenture is permitted pursuant to Article VIII of the
Indenture; and
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Representations of the Issuer. The Issuer
hereby represents that:
(a) The Issuer is a municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota, duly organized and existing
under the Constitution and laws of the State. The Issuer has full
power to enter into this Agreement and the Supplemental Indenture
and to carry out the terms thereof and hereof.
(b) To the best knowledge of the Issuer no member of the
governing body or other officer or employee of the Issuer is
directly or indirectly interested in this Agreement, the Loan
Agreement, the Indenture or the Supplemental Indenture.
(c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
Supplemental Indenture have been duly authorized by resolution of
the governing body duly adopted in accordance with applicable law
on June 7, 1993, which resolution is in full force and effect
without amendment or modification.
(d) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and the Supplemental Indenture will not conflict with, or
MFF(7D9D. WP5
cause a breach or default or acceleration of performance or
creation of a lien under, any agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease
or other instrument to which the Issuer is subject or is a party or
by which it or its property is bound.
(e) Assuming due authorization, execution and delivery
thereof by the other parties thereto, this Agreement and the
Supplemental Indenture are valid and legally binding agreements of
the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to
the extent limited by laws affecting remedies and by bankruptcy,
reorganization, moratorium, insolvency or other similar laws or
principles of equity of general application affecting the
enforcement of creditors' rights.
(f) To the best knowledge of the Issuer, there is no
litigation or other legal proceedings of any nature, either pending
or threatened, to restrain or enjoin the execution, delivery or
performance of this Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Indenture or
the Supplemental Indenture or which could materially adversely
affect the validity or security of the Bonds or the remarketing
thereof on the date hereof.
Section 2. Representations and Warranties By the
Company. The Company hereby represents that:
(a) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement have been duly authorized by all appropriate action of
the Company and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery
hereof by the Issuer, this Agreement is a valid and legally binding
agreement of the Company, enforceable in accordance with its terms,
except to the extent limited by laws affecting remedies and by
bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium, insolvency or other similar
laws or principles of equity of general application affecting the
enforcement of creditors' rights.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and the Loan Agreement (as amended hereby) by the Company
will not conflict with, or cause a breach or default or
acceleration of performance or creation of any lien under, any
agreement, evidence of indebtedness, indenture, mortgage, lease or
other instrument to which the Company is subject or is a party or
by which it or its property is bound.
(c) To the best knowledge of the Company, no member of
the governing body or other officer or employee of the Issuer is
directly or indirectly interested in this Agreement, the Loan
Agreement, the Indenture or the Supplemental Indenture.
(d) To the best knowledge of the Company, there is no
litigation or other legal proceedings of any nature, either pending
or threatened, to restrain or enjoin the execution, delivery or
performance of this Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Supplemental
Indenture or the Indenture or which could materially adversely
affect the validity or security of the Bonds or the remarketing of
the Bonds on the date hereof.
MFF07D9D. WP5 - 2 -
r
Section 3. Amendment to Section 1.1. Clause (h) of the
definition of "Permitted Encumbrances." in Section 1.1 of the Loan
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"(h) Any purchase agreement, purchase money
mortgage or contract for deed entered into by the Company
in connection with a sale of the Project permitted
herein, and any Reimbursement Mortgage or any other
mortgage lien or security interest securing the Initial
Guarantor so long as the Initial Guaranty shall be in
effect; and"
Section 4. Amendment to Section 5.2. Section 5.2(a) of
the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
"(a) Until the principal and interest on all Bonds
shall have been fully paid or provision therefor shall
have been made in accordance with the Indenture, as and
for Loan Repayments the Company shall pay in immediately
available funds at the principal office of the Trustee
for the account of the Issuer for deposit in the Bond
Fund amounts sufficient to pay when due all principal and
Redemption Price of and interest on all Outstanding
Bonds.
To effect the foregoing, on or before the last
Business Day prior to each Stated Interest Payment Date
which occurs on or after January 1, 1994, a sum equal to
all principal of and interest due on the Bonds on the
Stated Interest Payment Date (whether principal is due by
maturity or Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption).
Any above payment by the Company which would
otherwise be due and payable on a date which is not a
Business Day shall be due and payable on the first
Business Day immediately preceding such date. Any
payment due above shall be reduced by giving credit for
moneys then on deposit in the Bond Fund and available for
payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds which do
not consist of prior Loan Repayments (or amounts which
credited against such payments) , including any accrued
Bond interest deposited on the Date of Issue.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the amount held by
the Trustee in the Bond Fund and available under the
terms of the Indenture for such purpose should be
sufficient to timely pay the principal or Redemption
Price of and interest on all Outstanding Bonds, the
Company shall not be obligated to make any further
payment of Loan Repayments."
Section 5. Amendment to Section 7.3. The first sentence
of Section 7.3 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:
MFF07D9D. WP5
1911
"The Company agrees and warrants that during the
Term the Company' shall maintain its existence as a
corporation duly organized and in good standing under
laws of the State and shall not dissolve and wind up,
dispose of all or substantially all of its assets (except
in accordance with Section 8.2 hereof) or consolidate
with or merge into another entity, unless the resultant
or transferee entity is a party subject to personal
jurisdiction in the State who shall assume in writing all
of the obligations of the Company under this Agreement,
the Mortgage and the Declaration."
Section 6. Amendment to Section 8.2. The first sentence
of Section 8.2 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Except as otherwise provided herein, the Project
and any portion thereof may not be sold or transferred
unless the Company shall remain fully liable for all its
obligations hereunder or unless (a) the purchaser or
transferee thereof shall receive an assignment of this
Agreement in accordance with Section 8.1 and (b) the
Credit Provider shall consent in writing thereto;
provided, however, that the Company shall furnish the
Trustee and the Credit Provider an Opinion of Bond
Counsel stating in effect, that such sale or transfer
shall not result in interest on the Bonds becoming
included in the gross income of the Holders for federal
income tax purposes."
Section 7. Amendment to Section 9.1. Paragraph (a) of
Section 9.1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
"(a) the Company shall fail to pay in full any
installment of Loan Repayment on the date on which such
repayment is due;"
Section 8. Consent. to Supplemental Indenture. The
Company hereby consents to the amendment of the Indenture in
accordance with the terms of the Supplemental.Indenture.
Section 9. Other Provisions in Effect. Except as above
provided, the provisions of the Loan Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect, and all amendments thereof pursuant hereto shall
be effective as of the date hereof.
Section 10. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Minnesota; may be executed in one or more counterparts, with
each counterpart constituting a single and original instrument; may
not be amended except in accordance with the terms of the
Indenture; shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
successors and assigns of the parties hereto; may not be assigned
except as the Loan Agreement may be assigned in accordance with its
MFFO7D9D.WP5 - 4 -
terms; and shall take effect as of the date first above written
without further notice to or consent from any person.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]
MFF07D9D.WP5 - 5 -
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned parties have executed
this instrument the day and year first above written.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
By
City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was executed before me on
1993 by and
the Mayor and City Manager, respectively,
of the City of Edina, Minnesota, a political subdivision of the
State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
(notarial seal)
[Signature Page to First Amendment to Loan Agreement]
MFF07D9D.WP5 - 6 -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Minnesota
By
Its
The foregoing instrument was executed before me on
1993 by the
of a
on behalf of said
Notary Public
(notarial seal)
[Signature Page to First Amendment to Loan Agreement]
MFF07D9D. WP5
-7-
i.
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST
THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST ( "Supplemental
Indenture ") dated July 1, 1993 between the City of Edina,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of
the State of Minnesota (the "Issuer ") and First Trust National
Association, a national banking association (the "Trustee ").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Issuer issued its Mortgage Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990 in the original
aggregate principal amount of $6,735,000 (the "Bonds ") pursuant to
an Indenture of Trust dated as of July 1, 1990 (the "Indenture ")
between the Issuer and the Trustee, and the Issuer loaned the sale
proceeds of the Bonds to Ohmega Building Corporation (the
"Company ") pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of July 1, 1990
between the Issuer and the Company (the "Loan Agreement ");
WHEREAS, the Company has requested amendments to the
Indenture as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, this Supplemental Indenture is authorized
pursuant to Article VIII of the Indenture; and
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the
parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used but
not defined herein are used with the meanings ascribed thereto in
the Indenture.
Section 2. Amendment to Section 301. The Mandatory
Sinking Fund Redemption Date schedule in Section 301(d) of the
Indenture is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Mandatory
Mandatory
Sinking Fund
Sinking Fund
Redemption Date
Principal
Redemption Date
Principal
(July 1)
Amount
(July 1)
Amount
1993
$ 60,000
2008
$220,000
1994
-0-
2009
230,000
1995
-0-
2010
240,000
1996
120,000
2011
255,000
1997
125,000
2012
265,000
1998
135,000
2013
280,000
1999
140.,000
2014
295,000
2000
150,000
2015
310,000
2001
155,000
2016
325,000
2002
165,000
2017
340,000
2003
170,000
2018
355,000
2004
180,000
2019
375,000
2005
190,000
2020
395,000
2006
200,000
2021
415,000
2007
210,000
2022*
435,000
MFF07DBC. WP5
Section 3. Amendment to Section 301. Paragraph (a) of
Section 301 of the Indenture is hereby amended by deleting
therefrom the following:
"(other than the Initial Guaranty)"
Section 4. New Bond Forms. The form of the Bonds set
forth in Appendix A to the Indenture is hereby amended to reflect
the foregoing changes in Sinking Fund redemption schedule. At the
expense of the Company, new forms of the Bonds shall be forthwith
prepared with a prefix designation of "RA ", and thereupon executed
and authenticated as required for purposes of the Indenture as
amended hereby.
Section 5. Other Provisions In Effect. Except as above
provided, the provisions of the Indenture shall remain in full
force and effect, and all amendments thereof pursuant hereto shall
be effective as of the date hereof.
Section 6. Miscellaneous. This Supplemental Indenture
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Minnesota; may be executed in one or more
counterparts, with each counterpart constituting a single and
original instrument; may not be amended except in accordance with
the terms of the Indenture; shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto; may
not be assigned except as the Indenture may be assigned in
accordance with its terms; and shall take effect as of the date
first above written without further notice to or consent from any
person.
[Remainder.of Page Intentionally Blank]
MFF07DBC.WP5 - 2 -
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned parties have executed
this instrument the day and year first above written.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
By
City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was executed before me on
1993 by and
the Mayor and City Manager, respectively,
of the City of Edina, Minnesota, a political subdivision of the
State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
(notarial seal)
[Signature Page to First Supplemental Indenture of Trust]
MFFFU7DBC.WP5 -3-
FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By
Its
and
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrumen
1993 by
respectively
Association, a national banking
banking association.
(notarial seal)
t was acknowledged before me on
and
the and
of First Trust National
association on behalf of said
Notary Public
[Signature Page to First Supplemental Indenture of Trust]
MFF(7DSCA'P5 -4-
f
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU. JUN 10. 1993. 8:46 PM
page 1
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
135911
05/03/93
$867.98
NEDOROSKI, DAN
CPNTRACTED REPAIRS
5923.
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$867.98*
135912
05/03/93
$423.30
COMMERCIAL LIFE INSU
LIFE INSURANCE
050493
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$423.30*
135913
05/07/93
$92,000'.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
050793.
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
05/07/93
- $92,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
050793,
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
135914
05/10/93
$20,630.28
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE /FICA
051093
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< *>
$20,630.28*
135915
06/08/93
$83.25
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688691
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.83
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688691
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$362.57
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688692
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.63
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688692
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LID608
06/08/93
$178.65
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688695
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.79
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688695
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$88.85
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688696
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.89
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688696
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$166.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688698
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688698
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$583.32
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688699
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.83
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688699
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$132.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688701
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.32
EAGLE WINE
LI19930517
688701
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$1,579.48*
135916
06/08/93
$463.45
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8630
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$560.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8504
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$54.49
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8594
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.09
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8594
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$537.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8592
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$508.77
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8765
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.18
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8765
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$43.91
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8766
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI060B
06/08/93
-$0.88
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8766
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$980.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8636
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,697.42
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8742
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $33.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8742
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$613.10
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8429
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$636.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8551
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$229.48
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8553
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.59
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8553
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$861.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8556
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,336.13
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8743
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $26.72
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8743
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,316.05
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8637
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$457.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930517
8430
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$10,220.04*
135917
06/08/93
$1,199.30
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930517
688067
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $23.99
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930517
688067
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
- $15.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930517
786694
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
2,731.86
GRIGGS COOPER
& Co
688792
VI:ItNI)N SELLING
06/08/93
1,215.37
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
688793
50th ST SELLING
06/08/93
3,995.94
GRIGGS COOPER
�: GO
088794
YORK SELLING,
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU,
JUN
10,
1993, 8:46 PM
page 2
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR,
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
--------------------------------------------
135917
06/08/93
$0.16
--
GRIGGS COOFLii
-
&
---------...------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO.
LI19930517
786694
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.50
GRIGGS COOPER
&
CO.'
LI19930517
78714
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.02
GRIGGS COOPER
&
CO.
LI19930517
78714
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
135918
06/08/93
$1,521.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381467
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381467
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $30.43
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381467
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$167.53
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381459
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381459
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.35
JOHNSON
WINE
CO
LI19930517
381459
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$495.93
JOHNSON
WINE
CO
LI19930517
381483
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$10.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381483
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
L10608
06/08/93
-$4.99
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381483
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$121.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381434
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381434
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381434
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$205.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381426
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381426
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.06
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381426
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$143.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381475
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381475
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.43
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381475
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$198.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381442
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381442
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381442
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$275.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381418
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381418
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381418
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$686.66
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381517
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381517
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $13.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381517
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$520.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381541
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930517
381541
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.23
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381541
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
1122.05
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381533
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
L10608.
06/08/93
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381533
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381533
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$454.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381491
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930517
381491
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381491
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$152.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381509
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381509
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381509
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,570.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381525
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$20.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381525
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $71.42
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381525
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $14.94
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
LI19930517
376327
381376
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WIN
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
LI0608
06/08/93
06/08/93
$4,070.56
$26.00
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19930517
381376
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $81.43
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381376
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$656.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930517
381368
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$5.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381368
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $13.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381368
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$523.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930517
381392
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
i
j � •
r
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU,_JUN 10,
1993, 8:46 PM
page 3
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
135918
06/08/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381392
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.26
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381392
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$186.16
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381335
VERNON
SELLING
CST,OF
GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381335
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.86
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381335
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$440.85
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381327
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381327
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.41
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381327
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$129.80
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381350
VERNON
SELLING
CST-OF
GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381350
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.30
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381350
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$79.15
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI199305-17
381384
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381384_
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-50.80
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
381384
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,836.26
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
324442
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$8.45
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
324442
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $36.73
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
324442
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $174.77
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
386573
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $136.72
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19930517
X377507
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
<*>
$16,078.79*
135919
06/08/93
$150.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31402
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31402
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$131.90
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31405
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$6.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31405
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$106.90
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31406
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930517
31406
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$400.80*
135920
06/08/93
$60.00
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688169
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LID608
06/08/93
-$0.60
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688169
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$593.80
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688170
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.94
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688170
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$508.79
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688171
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.09
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688171
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$974.96
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688172
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$9.75
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930517
688172
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$2,116.17*
135921
06/08/93
$1,071.60
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
084938
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.72
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
084938
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,293.41
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
084996
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $12.93
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
084996
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$746.24
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
084998
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.46
QUALITY.WINE
LI19930517
084998
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,767.46
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085165
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $35.35
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085165
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,771.54
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085167
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $55.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085167
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$296.94
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085234
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.94
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085234
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$42.80
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085530
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085530
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,035.49
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085169
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $60.71
QUALITY
WINE
LI19930517
085169
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU, JUN 10, 19!'
8:46 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
----------------------------------
<*>
$10,836.51•
135922
06/08/93
$145.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19930517
1106
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.00
SALUD AMERICA
LI19930517
1106
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$147.00*
135923
06/08/93
$106.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4304
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4304
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$112.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4303
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4303
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$80.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4311
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19930517
4311
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$305.00*
135924
06/08/93
$151.67
WORLD CLASS WINES IN
LI19930517
14272
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$66.00
WORLD CLASS WINES IN
LI19930517
14281
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$217.67*
135925
05/11/93
$19.62
PERA
PERA
051093
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYA
< *>
$19.62*
135926
05/11/93
$30,122.02
-PERA
PERA
051093
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYA
< *>
$30,122.02*
135927
05/12/93
$6,825.43
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
NORMANDALE 1ST HALF
T 051293
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$6,825.43*
135928
05/17/93
$64.84
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
ASPHALT /DUMP
1027.
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
05/17/93
$180.21
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLAKTOP
9073.
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
05/17/93
$792.49
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
9073.
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
< *>
$1,037.54*
135929
05/17/93
$41.00
MGA
SUPPLIES
041493
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$41.00*
135930
06/08/93
$194.85
BELLBOY CORPORATION
LI19930518
41014
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$194.85*
135931
06/08/93
$277.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90747
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.78
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90747
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$169.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90748
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90748
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$138.75
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90750
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L10608
06/08/93
-$1.39
EAGLE WINE
1119930518
90750
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$609.60
EAGLE WINE
1.119930518
90751
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.10
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90751
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$27.75
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90752
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.28
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90752
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$302.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90754
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.02
EAGLE WINE
LI19930518
90754
YORK SELLING
CASH DT'�(:OUNT
LI0608
< *>
$1,509.83*
135932
06/08/93
$393.60
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19930518
10786
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,339.31
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19930518
LI19930518
11060
11060
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
LI0608
06/08/93
- $46.79
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
THU, JUN 10, 1993, 8:46 PM
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
page 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
135932
06/08/93
$785.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11061
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$411.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10924
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$73.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10789
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.46
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10789
VERNON
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$513.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119930518
10787
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LID608
06/08/93
$464.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10706
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,531.57
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11062
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $30.63
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11062
VERNON
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$854.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11063
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$89.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10780
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$939.51
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11056
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $18.79
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11056
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$108.98
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10781
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.18
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10781
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$668:65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
10916
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,314.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930518
11057
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
< *>
$10,389.27*
135933
06/08/93
$3,676.49
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $73.53
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $3,676.49
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$73.53
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,676.47
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $73.53
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91287
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$770.75
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91288
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $15.42
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91288
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,177.68
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91289
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $43.55
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91289
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$4,275.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91290
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $85.52
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
91290
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $70.37
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
78735
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.70
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930518
78735
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$10,613.11*
135934
06/08/93
$156.26
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410712
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.16
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410712
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GO
WIN
LID608
06/08/93
-$1.57
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410712
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$47.53
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410688
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410688
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.48
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410688
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$140.17
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410720
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.12
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410720
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.42
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410720
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,055.07
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410670
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$12.48
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410670
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.54
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410670
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,096.74
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410704
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$5.72
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410704
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $21.93
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410704
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $30.24
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
1505320
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$30.24
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
1505320
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $30.42
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
1505320
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$125.16
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409813
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409813
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.25
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409813
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU,
JUN 10,
1993, 8:46 PM
Pa9^- 6
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
--------------------------------------------------
135934
06/08/93
$732.23
JOHNSON
WINE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO.
LI19930519
409797
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409797
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409797
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,056.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409821
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409821
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $21.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409821
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$721.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409854
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$13'.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409854
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409854
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$332.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409847
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$8.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409847
YORK.SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409847
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,274.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409839
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LID608
06/08/93
$11.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409839
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $45.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409839
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$47.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409805
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409805
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
409805
YORK SELLING
CASE{ DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,442.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410621
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410621
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $28.85
JOHNSON.WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410621
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$5,483.55
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410639
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$30.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410639
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $109.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410639
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$112.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410647
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410647
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410647
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$601.67
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410613
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410613
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410613
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$634.49
JOHNSON
t11NE
CO.
LI19930519
410597
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410597
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410597
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$394.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410654
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410654
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
410654
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$723.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
388850
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$6
-76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930519
388850
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10608
06/0.8/93
- $14.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
388850
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
1505312
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,359.09
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
369332
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$20.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
369332
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $67.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930519
369332
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
<•>
$20,304.16"
135935
06/08/93
$60.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930518
31541
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930518
31541
50111 ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
<*>
$63.00"
135936
06/08/93
$998.04
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930519
I.I19930519
90652
90652
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
L "10608
06/08/93
06/08/93
-$9.98
$413.06
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
COMPANY
LI19930519
90653
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.13
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930519
90653
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,009.66
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930519
90654
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.10
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19930519
90654
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
e . ! '1 9
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, JUN 10, 1993, 8:46 PM
page 7
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
135936
06/08/93
$136.43
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930519
91995
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.36
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930519
91995
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$2,531.62*
135937
06/08/93
$1,228.80
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086771
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608.
06/08/93
- 812.29
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086771
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,199.30
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086773
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $11.99
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086773
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,550.94
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086791
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $15.51
QUALITY WINE
L119930519
086791
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$4,493.57
QUALITY WINE
L119930519
086872
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $89.87
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086872
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$6,356.81
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086875
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $127.14
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086875
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$5,137.76
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086886
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $104.32
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086886
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$360.78
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086926
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.22
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086926
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$96.92
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086927
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.94
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
086927
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$237.30
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
087304
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
087304
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$65.28
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
087445
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.65
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
087445
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
-$9.52
QUALITY WINE
LI19930519
085966
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$20,342.26*
135938
05/18/93
$100.00
MACHOLDA,ED
POOL PETTY CASH FUND
051893
SWIM PROG
PETTY CASH
05/18/93
$60.00
MACHOLDA,ED
CHANGE FUND
051893
SWIM PROG
CHANGE FUND
< *>
$160.00*
135939
05/20/93
$904.91
SINGLETON, JAMES
EXP REIMBURSE /CISD WO
052093
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$904.91*
135940
05/21/93
$88,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL,TRANSFER
052193
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
05/21/93
- $88,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRNASFER
052193
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
135941
05/24/93
$21,442.71
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE /FICA
052193
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYAB
< *>
$21,442.71*
135942
06/08/93
$83.25
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93271
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.83
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93271
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$273.85
EAGLE WINE
L119930528
93272
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LID608
06/08/93
-$2.74
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93272
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$75.60
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93273
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.76
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93273
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$64.40
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93274
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93274
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$166.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93276
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93276
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$649.25
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93277
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.49
EAGLE WINE
LI19930528
93277
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
<�>
$1.299.72*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER THU, JUN 10,
1993, 8::46,'P.M
Page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------
135943
06/08/93
$1,626.07
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13209
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- 532.52
ED PHILLIPS &
SOUS
LI19930602
13209
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$468.40,
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13135
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$707.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13060
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,009.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
11210
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$196.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13233
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$92.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13295
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$126.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13294
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.53
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13294
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$114.74
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13129
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
L10608
06/08/93
-$2.29
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13129
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$120.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13128
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$429.22
E: PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13134
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.58
EL PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13134
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$455.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119930602
13133
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$965.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13206
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $19.31
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13206
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$79.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13236
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,027.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13207
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$50 -50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
13762
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $30.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
142811
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $67.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930602
142842
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$7,307.90"
135944
06/08/93
$617.56
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93389
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $12.35
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93389
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,013.63
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93390
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $60.27
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93390
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,169.25
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93391
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $21.69
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93391
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$158.65
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93392
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.17
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93392
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$648.97
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93393
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $12.98
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
93393
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$4,569.06
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
933694
YORK
SELLING.
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $91.38
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
933694
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $14.10
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
79340
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $92.69
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930602
79341
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
L10608
<*>
$10,868.49"
135945
06/08/93
$186.20
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439877
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$6.24
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439877
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.87
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439877
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$139.75
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439836
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.60
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439836
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.40
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439836
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,627.91
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439851
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$14
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439851
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $32.55
-04
JOHNSON WINE
CO-
LI19930602
439851
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$492.10
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439885
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.36
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439885
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.94
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439885
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$777.52
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439844
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.80
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439844
439844
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
L10608
06/08/93
-$7.77
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930602
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER
CHECK# DATE CHECK AMOUNT
THU. JUN 10. 1993
VENDOR
8:46 PM
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT P.O. #
135945
06/08/93
$4,035.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439869
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$23.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439869
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $80.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439869
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$773.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439794
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439794
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $15.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439794
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$437.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439786
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439786
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439786
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$103.77
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739778
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739778
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.05
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739778
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$56.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439810
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD'WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439810
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439810
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$27.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439760
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439760
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-80.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439960
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$15.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439802
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439802
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439802
50TH ST
SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.05
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
406983
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$111.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439695
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439695
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439695
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$873.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439703
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439703
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439703
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$207.85
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439745
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$5.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439745
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439745
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$428.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739752
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$8.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739752
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.33
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
739752
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$803.36
.JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439729
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$6.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439729
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $16.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439729
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,674.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439737
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$14.65
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439737
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $53.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
439737
VERNON
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
415190
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.85
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
435669
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $39.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
415950
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $77.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
435651
50TH ST
SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $152.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930602
435677
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
< *>
$13,372.42*
135946
06/08/93
$70.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930602
31350
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$294.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930602
31767
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$5.60
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930602
31767
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$265.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930602
31768
YORK SELLING
-CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19930602
31768
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
< *>
$639.60*
135947
06/08/93
$60.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119930602
92817
VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WIN
LI0608
page 9
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, JUN 10, 1993, 8:46 PM
page 10
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
135947
06/08/93
-$0.60
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92817
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$643.25
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92818
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-86.43
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92818
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$271.02
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92819
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.98
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92819
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$60.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92820
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-50.60
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92820
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$882.23
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92821
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.82
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
92821
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$78.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
93204
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.79
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
93204
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608 .
06/08/93
$93.90
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
94592
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.94
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930602
94592
VERNON SELLJI'f.;
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$2,067.99"
135948
06/08/93
$859.66
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088369
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.60
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088369
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$821.48
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088370
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.21
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088370
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$362.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088371.
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
E3.62
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088371
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
18.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088375
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.18
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088375
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$18.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088376
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.18
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088376
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,966.69
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088773
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $59.33
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088773
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$621.48
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088793
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $12.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088793
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,222.68
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088805
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$24.45
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088805
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$214.37
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088927
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.29
QUALITY WINE
LI19930502
088927
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $237.30
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088163
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$699.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,399.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088849
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $13.99
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088849
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,582.95
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
089134
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $31.66
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
089134
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $699.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.00
QUALITY WINE
L11993.0602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$699.51
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$7.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19930602
088166
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$10,376.08*
135949
06/08/93
$266.00
WORLD CLASS WINES IN
LI19930602
14312
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$266.00*
135950
05/28/93
$19.62
PERA
PERA
052193
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYA
< *>
$19.62*
135951
05/28/93
$30,169.21
PERA
PERA
052193
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYA
< *>
$30,169.21*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU. JUN 10, 1993, 8:46 PM
page 11
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
135952
06/08/93
$1,317.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95143
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $13.17
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95143
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$831.13
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95147
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LID608
06/08/93
- $8..31
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95147
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,526.85
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95150
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $15.27
EAGLE WINE
LI19930603
95150
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
< ">
$3,638.30"
135953
06/08/93
$159.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15334
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.18
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15334
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$439.69
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15427
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$8.79
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15427
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$444.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
- LI19930603
15335
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$660.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15192
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,058.10
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15428
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GO WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $551.76
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
143006
YORK
SELLING,
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$724.73
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15433
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $14.49
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15433
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,590.47
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15064
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$554.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15336
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,262.45
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15435
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$193.98
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15326
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ.LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.88
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15326
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,156.49
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15416
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $23.13
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15416
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$486.35
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15324
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$948.10
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15191
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$913.25
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19930603
15417
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
<x>
$9,986.03"
135954
06/08/93
$2,551.81
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95713
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $51.04
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95713
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,205.98
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95714
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $24.12
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95714
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$103.17
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95715
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.06
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95715
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,635.02
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95716
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $52.70
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95716
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,657.77
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95717
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $33.16
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95717
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,413.02
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95718
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$48.26
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
95718
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$159.40
GRIGGS.COOPER
& CO."
LI19930607
96397
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.38
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
96397
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $19.46
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
79714
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.20
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
79714
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $38.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19930607
79453
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.38
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO..
LI19930607
79453
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LID608
<•>
$10,455.57"
135955
06/08/93
$1,365.00
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467944
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.28
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467944
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $27.30
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467944
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,570.81
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467936
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.88
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467936
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK
NUMBER
THU,
JUN 10,
1993, 8:46 PM
page 12
CHECK# DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
135955 06/08/93
- $31.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467936
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$597.09
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467969
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467969
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$6.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467969
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,335.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467894
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
513.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467894
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
L10608
06/08/93
- b13.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467894
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$128.43
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467951
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467951
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467951
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$224.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467928
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467928
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930603
467928
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$97.12•
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467910
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467910
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF-GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467910
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,448.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466847
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$21.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466847
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $68.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466847
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,718.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466888
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466888
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $34.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466888
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,644.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466896
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466896
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $32.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466896
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$121.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466870
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$0.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466870
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466870
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,002.03
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466854
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$12.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466854
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN•LI0608
06/08/93
- $10.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466854
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$256.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466904
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466904
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$2.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466904
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
'CST
LI0608
06/08/93
$988.33
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466912
YORK SELLING
OF GD WIN
LI0608.
06/08/93
$17.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
466912
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$9.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119930603
466912
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,227.59
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467852
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
$7.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467852
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $24.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467852
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$3,361.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467845
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
L10608
06/08/93
$23.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467845
VERNON SELLING
CST OF.GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $67.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467845
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$508.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467878
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0808
06/08/93
$9.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467878
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$5.10
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467878
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,658.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467811
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$17.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467811
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $16.61
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467811
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$433.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467860
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$10.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467860
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467860
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$409.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467837
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467837
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$4.09
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19930603
467837
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNT
L10608
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER BY CHECK NUMBER THU, JUN 10, 1993, 8:46 PM
page 13
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
135955
06/08/93
$190.00
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19930603
135955
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
L10608
06/08/93
-$1.90
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19930603
135955
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $31.32
JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19930603
1507961
YORK
SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUN
LI0608
< *>
$22,079.85*
135956
06/08/93
$62.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19930607
31994
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19930607
31994
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$62.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19930607
31991
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
$4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19930607
31991
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
< *>
$131.00*
135957
06/08/93
$129.30
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95144
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.29
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95144
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,434.92
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95145
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $14.35
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95145
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$146.20
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95148
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.46
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95148
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,102.87
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95149
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $11.03
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95149
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$129.30
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119930607
95151
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$1.29
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95151
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$389.05
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95152
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$3.89
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19930607
95152
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
< *>
$3,298.33*
135958
06/08/93
$68.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
089059
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.68
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
089059
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$1,723.48
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090137
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $17.23
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090137
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$2,960.35
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090209
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
- $29.60
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090209
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$978.92
QUALITY WINE
L119930607
090517
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $19.58
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090517
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$64.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090518
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.65
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090518
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$2,338.32
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090519
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $46.77
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090519
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
L10608
06/08/93
$2,401.58
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090545
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
06/08/93
- $48.03
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090545
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
$25.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
091020
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WIN
LI0608
06/08/93
-$0.26
QUALITY WINE
L119930607
091020
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNT
LI0608
06/08/93
- $168.80
QUALITY WINE
LI19930607
090944
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQ
LI0608
< *>
$10,230.05*
$335,630.77*
.COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY BY CHECK NUMBER THU, JUN 10, 1993, 9:02 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND # 10 $104,779.86
FUND # 26 $160.00
FUND # 27 $6,866.43
FUND # 40 $857.33
FUND # 50 $222,967.15 52i5'929.
^°
$335,630.77*
•
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
COUNCIL DATE 6/21/93
page 1
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136941
06/21/93
$36.32
A -2 RENTAL
RENTAL
C23933 -0
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
7684
< *>
$36.32*
136943
06/21/93
$362.95
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$107.54
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$134.42
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$362.95
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$167.29
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$390.77
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$167.29
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$53.77
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$161.30
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
POOL OPERATION
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$706.98
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$107.54
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$322.62
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$425.87
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$36.75
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$63.63
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$118.37
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$40.73
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
GUN RANGE
RUBBISH
REMOV
06/21/93
$362.95
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
RUBBISH
REMOVAL
060193
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOV
< *>
$4,093.72*
136944
06/21/93
$41.80
ACTION MESSENGER
SERVICE
CONTRACT
110993
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$41.80*
136945
06/21/93
$930.00
ADVANTAGE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
918227
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
7863
< *>
$930.00*
136946
06/21/93
$8.98
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
5217861
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$8.98*
136947
06/21/93
$69.23
ALCO CAPITAL RESOURC
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
21392027
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$69.23*
136948
06/21/93
$213.87
AMERICAN LASER CUT G
POOL SIGNS
90310
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL
SUPPL
< *>
_
$213.87*
136949
06/21/93
$251.27
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$12.48
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$200.50
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$71.57
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$60.89
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$202.14
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$80.52
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$25.20
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
053193/G
GRILL
LAUNDRY
< *>
$904.55*
136950
06/21/93
$46.21
AQUA ENGINEERING
SADDLE
002047
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL
SUPPL
7632
< *>
$46.21*
136951
06/21/93
$131,445.18
ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
92 -10 PY
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$131,445.18*
136952
06/21/93
$18.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
COFFEE /VAN VALKENBURG
59262
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 2
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
518.00*
136953
06/21/93
$28.89
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
52000020
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.89*
136954
06/21/93
$44.79
AT &T
TELEPHONE
053193
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$44.79*
136955
06/21/93
$225.00
ATOM
CONT ED
2750
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$225.00*
136956
06/21/93
$100.00
AULIK, LAURA
VARIANE APPLICATION R-
060293
GENERAL FD PRO
PLANNING FEES
<*>
$100.00*
136957
06/21/93
$245.74
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84877
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$191.01
AVR INC
CONCRETE
84696
DISTRIBUTION
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$649.29
AVR INC
CONCRETE
85656
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$539.34
AVR INC
CONCRETE
85350
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$371.02
AVR INC
CONCRETE
85211
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$397.52
AVR INC
CONCRETE
85169
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
06/21/93
$344.52
AVR INC
CONCRETE
85588
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
< *>
$2,738.44*
136958
06/21/93
$29.95
AWD COOLERS OF MINNE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55237
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$29.95'*
136959
06/21/93
$17.46
AXT, LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
061593
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$17.46*
136960
06/21/93
$205.08
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
PLANTS
52230
CENTENNIAL LAK
TREES FLWR SH
7229
06/21/93
$831.77
BACHMANS NURSERY WHO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
53220
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7511
< *>
$1,036.85*
136961
06/21/93
$416.61
BACHMANS
SHRUBS
204242 2
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
136962
06/21/93
$433.23
BALLOMATIC INC
BAG RACK
10039
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
7922
< *>
$433.23*
136963
06/21/93
$2,250.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATI
PROF SERVICES
061393
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,250.00*
136964
06/21/93
$21.43
BARTLETT, LIZ
REFUND COACH PITCH
061593
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
<*>
$21.43*
136965
06/21/93
$90.00
BCA /TRAINING & DEVEL
ARSON TRG
7051127
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$90.00*
136966
06/21/93
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS
SABER BATTERY
030877
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7257
(*>
$77.682
136967
06/21/93
$175.00
BEER WHOLESALERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
143955
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/21/93
$495.23 .
BEER WHOLESALERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
144028
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$670.23 *'
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 3
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136968
06/21/93
$28.23
BENN, BRADLEY
ADVERTISING
061593
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$28.23*
136969
06/21/93
$100.00
BENNETT. WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
136970
06/21/93
$136.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
060293/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQ
06/21/93
$208.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
060293/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
06/21/93
$295.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
060293 -V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQ
< *>
$639.00*
136971
06/21/93
$44.73
BERNARD J. MULCAHY C
REPAIR
60032
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
7929
< *>
$44.73*
136972
06/21/93
$49:20
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
RECEPT 20 GAL
908887
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$11.02
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
905938
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$6.77
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
905938
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$81.07
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
909440
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$7.14
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
909470
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$17.89
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CREDIT MEMO TAKEN TWI
060993
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/21/93
$6.62
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
911804
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/21/93
$83.38
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
911827
SWIMMING INSTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$263.09*
136973
06/21/93
$94.16
BEST COPY STORES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051993
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$94.16*
136974
06/21/93
$11.43
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
KEYS
39485
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPL
7709
< *>
$11.43*
136975
06/21/93
$4,537.29
BFI OF MN INC
REFUSE
930500 -1
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,537.29*
136976
06/21/93
$37,998.36
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING SERVICE CON
930500 -7
RECYCLING
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$37,998.36*
136977
06/21/93
$116.52
BIFFS INC
PORTABLE RESTROOM
001955
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$116.52
BIFFS INC
S
001954
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH REMOV
< *>
$233.04*
136978
06/21/93
$353.00
BISHOP TRAVEL CENTER
AIRFARE
013572
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
06/21/93
$336.00
BISHOP TRAVEL CENTER
AIRFARE
014322
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$689.00*
136979
06/21/93
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
<*>
$100.00*
136980
06/21/93
$61.34
BLOOMINGTON LINOLEUM
PANELING
11915
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7390
< *>
$61.34*
136981
06/21/93
$144.00
BOE, KEITH
CLASS REFUND
060193
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$144.00*
136982
06/21/93
$187.50
BOWLER, WILLIAM
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
BOWLER, WILLIAM
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 4
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$202.50*
136983
06/21/93
$17.68
BOYER TRUCKS
HANDLE
226241
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7810
< *>
$17.68*
136984
06/21/93
$124.49
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
FLOWERS
061593
MAINT OF COURS
FERTILIZER
06/21/93
$13.45
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
PRINTING
061593
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
06/21/93
$198.55
BRAEMAR GOLF-COURSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
061593
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/21/93
$34.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
— PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
061593
GOLF ADMINISTR
PROF SERVICES
06/21/93
$6.14
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
061593
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
06/21/93
$15.23-
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
061593
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$391.86*
136985
06/21/93
$42.00
BRANHAM, ELIZABETH
CLASS REFUND
060293
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$42.00*
136986
06/21/93
$358.60
BRAUN INTERTEC
PROF ENG SERVICES
042746
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$358.60*
136987
06/21/93
$89.76
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
2543 CLASSIS -VAC
286239
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPP
8032
< *>
.$89.76*
136988
06/21/93-
$230.00
BROCK ENTERPRISES
LEARN TO SWIM EQUIP
011308
SWIMMING INSTR
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$230.00*
136989
06/21/93
$347.72
BUELL'S INC
PLANTS
5897
CENTENNIAL LAK
TREES FLWR SH
< *>
$347.72*
136990
06/21/93
$4.37
BUIE, BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
060893
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
06/21/93
$19.46
BUIE, BARBARA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
060893
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$29.00
BUIE, BARBARA
POSTAGE
060893
ED ADMINISTRAT
POSTAGE
06/21/93
$10.72
BUIE, BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
061493
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$63.55*
136991
06/21/93
$107.58
BUIE_, BARBARA
MILEAGE
061593.
ED ADMINISTRAT
MILEAGE
< *>
$107.58*
136992
06/21/93
$14.37
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14450860
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$33.65
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14450867
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$48.02*
136993
06/21/93
$25.22
BUR OF BUS PRACTICE
NEWSLETTER
8275182
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCR
7254
< *>
S25.22*
136994
06/21/93
$1,783.00
BUSINESS MACHINES SA
TYPEWRITER CONTRACT
114856
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$1,783.00*
136995
06/21/93
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
1100.00*
136998
06/21/93
$37.31
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
150351
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOO
7673
< *>
$37.31*
136997
06/21/93
$40.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE
061593
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$40.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 5
CHECK*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. •
136998
06/21/93
$757.75
CARLSON PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
57478
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
<*>
$757.75*
136999
06/21/93
$148.83
CASH REGISTER SALES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
544435
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
7921
<*>
$148.83*
137000
06/21/93
$136.32
CELLULAR ONE SERVICE
BATTERIES MOTOROLA
000266
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7250
< *>
5136.32*
137001
06/21/93
$69.34
CELLULAR ONE
AIR TIME
052493/P
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$101.08
CELLULAR ONE
PHONE RENTAL
052493/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
06/21/93
$69.55
CELLULAR ONE
PHONE RENTA;
052493/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$239.97*
137002
06/21/93
$255.60
CHEM CONCEPTS
GREASE /CLEANER
0590.
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
7453
06/21/93
$427.81
CHEM CONCEPTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0593
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
8199
< *>
$683.41*
137003
06/21/93
$15.00
CHRISTIANSON, SANDRA
REFUND TENNIS
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$15.00*
137004
06/21/93
$170.00
CHRISTIE, SUSAN
ART WORK SOLD
061593
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$170.00*
137005
06/21/93
$28.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
053193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$337.65
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
053193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$64.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
053193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$429.65*
137006
06/21/93
$173.31
CITY OF EDINA
BEER
060293
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
5173.31*
137007
06/21/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING CONTR
44294
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING CONTR
44293
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SER
WINDOW CLEANING CONTR
44295
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$40.50*
137008
06/21/93
$177.80
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
1344
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$177.80*
137009
06/21/93
$14.26
CLAUSMAN, RYAN
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
061093
POOL ADMIN
SAFETY EQUIPM
06/21/93
$24.45
CLAUSMAN, RYAN
STAFF TRAINING /FOOD &
061093
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$30.56
CLAUSMAN, RYAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061493
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$69.27*
137010
08/21/93
$830.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING C
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
053193
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$1,178.97
COCA COLA BOTTLING C
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$505.20
COCA COLA BOTTLING C
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$333.45
COCA COLA BOTTLING C
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
<*>
$2,848.12*
137011
06/21/93
$170.39
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
COMPUTER DESK
240496
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$6.00
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
240511
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$176.39*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 6
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137012
06/21/93
$30.00
CONNOLLY, 608
VISUAL ARTS /CL
JUNE 26
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00"
137013
06/21/93
$30.00
COOPER, PAM
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< ">
$30.00"
137014
06/21/93
$380.00
COURTNEY, C WAYNE
SERVICES
JUNE 199
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$380.00"
137015
06/21/93
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
JUNE 199
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
13 016
06/21/93
$213.00"
CRITTER CONTROL
BEAVER REMOVAL
21433
GENERAL TURF C
PROF SERVICES
8132
137017
06/21/93
$98.09
CSI
EQUIP MAINT
20482.
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
6525
06/21/93
$28.00
CSI
RADIO SERVICE
21374
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
5761
< *>
$126.09*
137018
06/21/93
$59.65
CULLIGAN
WATER
053193
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$27.40
CULLIGAN
SOFT WATER
053193
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICE
< ">
$87.05*
137019
06/21/93
$31.66
CW GLASS DESIGN
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
11851.
GC CIP
CIP
06/21/93
$487.00
CW GLASS DESIGN
PRO SHOP GLASS
11851
GC CIP
CIP
6922
< *>
$518.66*
137020
06/21/93
$150.00
DAKOTA COUNTY TECH C
CONT ED
051893
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
06/21/93
$180.00
DAKOTA COUNTY TECH C
CONT ED
001700
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
-
$330.00"
137021
06/21/93
$240.00
DATA LISTING SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12194
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$240.00*
137022
06/21/93
$300.00
DATAMAP INC
PROF SERVICES
5285
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
7623
06/21/93
$300.00
DATAMAP INC
PROF SERVICES
5286
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
7717
< *>
$600.00*
137023
06/21/93
$314.79
DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVER
DAIRY
0593
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$314.79"
137024
06/21/93
$54.80
DAVIDSEN DISTRIBUTIN
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
MAY /YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$65.20
DAVIDSEN DISTRIBUTIN
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
MAY /YORK
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$120.00*
137025
06/21/93
$38.61
DAVIES WATER EQUIPME
RETAINER SLAND 7220 M
36557
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7307
06/21/93
$44.21
DAVIES WATER EQUIPME
RETAINER SLAND 7220 M
36552
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7307
137026
06/21/93
$889.35
DCA INC
FEE FOR SERVICE
55691
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATI
< *>
$889.35*
137027
06/21/93
$256.64
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
JACK
43404
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
7656
< *>
$256.64*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 7
CHECK*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
137028
06/21/93
$40.00
DEMOS, BARBARA
REFUND TENNIS
060993
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
137029
06/21/93
$200.00
DEMUTH. DAN
JV DELOVPT /JR ACHIVMT
061593
GOLF ADMINISTR
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$200.00*
137030
06/21/93
$16.35
DEPENDABLE COURIER
CAFR DELIVERY
232684
FINANCE
PRO SVC AUDIT
< *>
$16.35*
137031
06/21/93
$242.10
DHARMA TRADING CO
CRAFT SUPPLIES
10457
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
7849
< *>
$242.10*
137032
06/21/93
$6,487.05
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
321038
LEGAL SERVICES
PRO SVC - LEG
< *>
$6,487.05*
137033
06/21/93
$1,528.92
DPC INDUSTRIES
WATER CHEMICALS
00975380
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT S
6915
06/21/93
$370.49
DPC INDUSTRIES
CHEMICALS
00977744
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
< *>
$1,899.41*
137034
06/21/93
$265.35
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
GOLF CAR PARTS
0480996
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
7479
<*>
$265.35*
137035
06/21/93
$114.39
EAGLE WINE
MISC
97628
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$87.71
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
97635
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$23.71
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
97632
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$225.81*
137036
06/21/93
$12,347.41
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$210.60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$86.10
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$3,846.64
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$7 984.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
1207.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$795.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
060193
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$25,477.70*
137037
06/21/93
$90.53
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACT
2268311
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQU
8052
06/21/93
$106.50
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACT
2268308
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
8052
< *>
$197.03*
137038
06/21/93
$39.15
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
19635
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$58.10
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
19467
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
<*>
$97.25*
137039
06/21/93
$36.90
EDINA PARK DELI & CO
MEETING EXPENSE
022493
CENTENNIAL LAK
MEETING EXPEN
8197
06/21/93
$59.75
EDINA PARK DELI & CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060293
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$96.65*
137040
06/21/93
$30.00
ERICSON, BRITA
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137041
06/21/93
$49.10
ERNIE'S CATERING SER
CONT ED
1312
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$49.10*
137042
06/21/93
$2,242.89
ESS BROS & SONS
M H EXTENSIONS
006987
SEWER TREATMEN
PIPE
7893
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER, WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 8
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$2,242.89*
137043
06/21/93
$210.00
FAEGRE & BENSON
CANCELLATION /BALL FIE
060793
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$210.00*
137044
06/21/93
$7.35
FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10045
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$27.44
'FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO
FILM
S09394
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
7848
< *>
$34.79*
137045
06/21/93
$187.50
FASULO, WALTER
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
FASULO, WALTER
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137046
06/21/93
$30.00
FEVOLD, DEBORAH
REFUND SWIMMING LESSO
060793
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137047
06/21/93
$997.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI
BACKSTOP FENCING
93 -00136
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
7924
06/21/93
$2,080.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRI
FENCING
93 -00164
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
8056
< *>
$3,077.00*
137048
06/21/93
$13,125.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
041593
IBR 02 PROG
INTEREST BOND
06/21/93
$418,558.75
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST /EDINBOR
051393
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
06/21/93
$35,350.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTERST
0513
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BOND
06/21/93
$70,201.25
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
MAY 13
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BOND
06/21/93
$66,403.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
051393.
ARENA ADMINIST
INTEREST BOND
06/21/93
$20,172.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
051393.
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BOND
< *>
$623,810.00*
137049
06/21/93
$3,717.64
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
SAFE
009093
GOLF PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
< *>
$3,717.64*
137050
06/21/93
$118.82
FRIDEN NEOPOST
INK ROLLER POSTAGE MA
P1226490
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$118.82*
137051
06/21/93
$91.18
FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE
FIRE BOOTS
2817
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTH
7255
< *>
$91.18*
137052
06/21/93
$76.08
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$123.85
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$375.31
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
052893
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
06/21/93
$359.97
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$287.55
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$733.73
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$195.80
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
DISTRIBUTION
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$959.78
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
052893
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
< *>_
$3,112.07*
137053
06/21/93
$1,298.49
G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC
PROF SERVICES
061193
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,298.49*
137054
06/21/93
$1,500.00
GARNASS, NANCY
SURVEY /HIGHLAND PK PR
060793
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,500.00*
137055
06/21/93
$63.02
GARTNER REFRIGERATIO
REPAIR /FAN BLADE
010751
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
7534
< *>
$63.02*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN
16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 9
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137056
06/21/93
$38.00
GEM TAP SERVICE
BEER LINES
053193
GRILL
CST 'OF GDS BE
< *>
$38.00*
137057
06/21/93
$450.47
GENCORP POLYMER PROD
TENNIS BALLS
58896 ,
TENNIS INSTRUC
GENERAL SUPPL
7931
< *>
$450.47*
137058
06/21/93
$1,359.57
GENERAL SPORTS
POOL UNIFORMS
036291
POOL OPERATION
LAUNDRY
7281
06/21/93
$272.70
GENERAL SPORTS
POOL UNIFORMS
036291
POOL CONCESSIO
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$311.94
GENERAL SPORTS
SOCCER NETS
036299
ATHLETIC ACTIV
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$28.15
GENERAL SPORTS
POOL UNIFORMS
036297
POOL OPERATION
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
$2,030.00
GENERAL SPORTS
T -BALL T- SHIRTS
036306
ATHLETIC ACTIV
GENERAL SUPPL
8047
< *>
$4,002.36*
137059
06/21/93
GERSTEN, LINDA
CLASS REFUND
060193
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
*
$32.00 *
137060
06/21/93
$655.00
GILBERT MECHANICAL C
DUCTWORK
013322
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7188
< *>
$655.00*
137061
06/21/93
$100.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
930603
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$100.00*
137062
06/21/93
$159,859.36
GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVA
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
92 -11 PY
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$159,859..36*
137063
06/21/93
$30.00
GLOVER, COLLEEN
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137064
06/21/93
$1,269.00
GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED
LEASE LINES
5019
GOLF CARS
LEASE LINES
< *>
$1,269.00*
137065
06/21/93
$25.00
GREENWALD, CAROL
CLASS REFUND
060293
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00*
137066
06/21/93
$180.77
GREENWAY IRRIGATION
REPAIR IRRIGATION LIN
001929
ATHLETIC ACTIV
PROF SERVICES
.< *>
$180.77*
137067
06/21/93
$804.42
GREER, PAT
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH/
JUNE 199
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$804.42*
137068
06/21/93
$16,084.00
GREUPNER, JOE
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - G
061493
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOL
< *>
$16,084.00*
137069
06/21/93
$217.50
GROVE NURSERY CENTER
SPRUCE
46914
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
7815
06/21/93
$14.14
GROVE NURSERY CENTER
SALES TAX
46914.
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$231.64*
137070
06/21/93
$27.58
GRUBERS POWER EQUIPM
FILTERS
17264
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7820
06/21/93
$171.36*
GRUBERS POWER EQUIPM
BLOWER
17274
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7832
< *>
137071
06/21/93
$76.60
GUST, MARGARET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060993
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$76.60*
137072
06/21/93
$532.77
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
OIL /GREASE
154223
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
7329
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 10
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
------------------------------------------7-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137072
06/21/93
$1,034.71
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
ENGINE OIL
155158
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
7445
06/21/93
$500.32
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
ENGINE OIL
155383
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
7595
< *>
$2,067.80*
137073
06/21/93
$30.00
HAPPY FACES
VISUAL ARTS /CL
JUNE 26
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
137074
06/21/93
$358.50
HARMON GLASS
REPAIR GLASS DOOR
24003360
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
8057
< *>
$358.50*
137075
06/21/93
$116.63
HEDBERG AGGREGATES
GENERAL SUPPLIES /SAND
44675
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7846
< *>
- $116.63*
137076
06/21/93
$425.14
HEIMARK FOODS
MEAT
052893
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
(*>
$425.14*
137077
06/21/93
$187.50
HELMER, RICHARD
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW,
06/21/93
$15.00
HELMER, RICHARD
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT..GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137078
06/21/93
$562.66
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDI
SUPPLIES (APRIL) AMBU
2499
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
5764
< *>
5562.66*
137079
06/21/93
$805.58
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHER
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
APRIL 19
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRIS
< *>
$805.58*
137080
06/21/93
$268.18
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
POSTAGE
10 -16140
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
< *>
$268.18*
137081
06/21/93
$27.90
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
TREE WASTE
22252
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOV
7971
< *>
$27.90*
137082
06/21/93
$3,499.36
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREA
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
1113
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRIS
< *>
$3,499.36*
137083
06/21/93
$100.00
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C
F.F. II TRG SIEMS
038025
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOL
*
■
137084
06/21/93
$399.38
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M
FIELD PAINT
26578
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POW
7886
< *>
$399.38*
137085
06/21/93
$220.00
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPLACEMENT
192778
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$532.86
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPLACEMENT
192778
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$752.86*
137086
06/21/93
$25.00
HOFFMAN, CHRISTINE
REFUND TENNIS_
061593
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00*
137087
06/21/93
$100.00
HOFFMAN. WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137088
06/21/93
$60.00
HOGAN, MURIEL
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$60.00*
137089
06/21/93
$110.79
HORIZON CHEMICAL CO
WATER TREATMENT
031495
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
7860
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 11
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$110.79*
137090
06/21/93
$1,139.83
HORIZON GRAPHICS INC
PRINTING
15350
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
7473
< *>
$1,139.83*
137091
06/21/93
$1,039.50
HORWATH, TOM
FORESTRY
061593
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
06/21/93
$16.50
HORWATH, TOM
TREE TRIMMING
061593
TREE TRIMMING
PROF SERVICES
06/21/93
$129.36
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE
061593
TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$1,185.36*
137092
06/21/93
$4,738.82
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METERS
5876
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WAT
5382
< *>
$4,738.82*
137093
06/21/93
$100.00
I.A.C.P.
DUES
060993
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$100.00*
137094
06/21/93
$9.88
INDELCO PLASTIC CORP
PVC PIPE
91456
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7278
06/21/93
$186.17
INDELCO PLASTIC CORP
REPAIR /WATER PIPE
91863
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
7856
06/21/93
$530.88
INDELCO PLASTIC CORP
CHECK VALVE FOR POOL
92438
POOL CIP
CIP
7754
< *>
$726.93*
137095
06/21/93
$107.01
INTERIOR COMMUNICATI
REPAIR PHONES
4200
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
7716
< *>
$107.01*
131096
06/21/93
$60.00
ISI
TEST GAUGE
91222
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7396
< *>
$60.00*
137097
06/21/93
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137098
06/21/93
$26.36
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$184.08
JERRYS FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
060193
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$18.60
JERRYS FOODS
MEETING EXPENSE
060193
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPEN
06/21/93
$14.65
JERRYS FOODS
SUPPLIES
060193
GENERAL FD PRO
SALE OF PROPE
06/21/93
$21.22
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$41.94
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
060193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CLEANING SUPP
05/21/93
$22.69
JERRYS FOODS
MEETING EXPENSE
060193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPEN
06/21/93
$38.72
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$411.31
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$65.52
JERRYS FOODS
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
060193
HUMAN RELATION
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$845.09*
137100
06/21/93
$15.14
JERRYS HARDWARE
'GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
GUN RANGE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$208.92
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$150.65
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$22.67
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$106.98
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$210.02
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$191.39
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$9.98
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$12.35
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$17.93
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL- SUPPL
06/21/93
$15.77
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$3.82
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$41.49
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN
16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 12
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137100
06/21/93
$84.06
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$17.86
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$20.72
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$4.73
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$117.83
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$36.78
JERRYS HARDWARE'
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$206.30
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$16.19
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$114.23
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$33.27
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAY 1993
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$1,659.08*
137101
06/21/93
$551.74
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
D2606
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
8187
< *>
$551.74*
137102
06/21/93
$160.37
JIM HATCH SALES
SHOVELS
2550
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7759
< *>
$160.37*
137103-06/21/93
$59.59
JOHNSON WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
522904
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$59.59*
137104
06/21/93
$73.00
JOHNSON, JANA
CLASS REFUND
060893
ART CNTR PROG.
REGISTRATION
< *>
$73.00*
137105
06/21/93
$25.00
JOHNSON, KAREN
REFUND TENNIS
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00*
137106
06/21/93
$18.00
JOHNSON, MARY
CLASS REFUND
060893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$18.00*
137107
06/21/93
$28.90
JOHNSON, NAOMI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061593
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$72.40
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
061593
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$27.00
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CLASS REFUND
061593
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$128.30*
137108
06/21/93
$40.19
JOHNSON, RALPH
SUMMER SEMINAR
060193
ASSESSING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$40.19*
137109
06/21/93
$100.00
JOHNSON, WALTER
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137110
06/21/93
$92.00
JULIEN, DIANE
BROOMS WITH HANDLES
061493
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
< *>
$92.00*
137111
06/21/93
$187.50
JULKOWSKI, JAMES
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
JULKOWSKI, JAMES
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137112
06/21/93
$411.13
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
6669
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
7504
06/21/93
$230.04
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
9351
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
7695
< *>
$641.17*
137113
06/21/93
$12.70
KAMINSEN, TONIA
REFUND PLAYGROUND PRO
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
<e>
$12.70*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 13
CHECK#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
137114
06/21/93
$721.80
KENNY BOILER & MFG C
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
73785
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
7861
< *>
$721.80"
137115
06/21/93
$159.26
KEPRIOS, JOHN
NEW SPEAKERS /PUPPET W
060793
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$159.26"
137116
06/21/93
$125.00
KEYE PRODUCTIVITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
061193
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$125.00"
137117
06/21/93
$25.00
KING, VON
REFUND TENNIS
060793
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00"
137118
06/21/93
$233.24
KNOX COMM CREDIT
MATERIAL TOOL SAW
056933
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7640
06/21/93
$440.30
KNOX COMM CREDIT
FORMS /CONCRTNG WATER
057094
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPL
7652
06/21/93
$24.14
KNOX COMM CREDIT
MATERIAL
057549
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
7745
06/21/93
$129.54
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
057581
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
7756
06/21/93
$39.04
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
057756
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
7845
06/21/93
$79.27
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
057850
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
7812
06/21/93
$63.70
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
057872
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
7816
06/21/93
$82.52
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
058053
CLUB HOUSE
LUMBER
7711
06/21/93
$58.13
KNOX COMM CREDIT
MISC HARDWARE
058256
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7872
06/21/93
$118.10
KNOX COMM CREDIT
SUPPLIES
058456
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPL
7909
06/21/93
$153.36
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
058697
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
7904
06/21/93
$75.26
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER /HARDWARE
058843
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
7954
06/21/93
$69.63
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
058782
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
7949
06/21/93
$140.23
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PAINTING SUPPLIES
059181
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7965
<�>
$1,706.46"
137119
06/21/93
$191.66
KOKESH ATHLETIC
BASKETBALL RIMS
72482
PATHS & HARD S
REPAIR PARTS
7366
06/21/93
$153.36
KOKESH ATHLETIC
BAT RACK
73077
FIELD MAINTENA
GENERAL SUPPL
7744
06/21/93
$110.53
KOKESH ATHLETIC
PLAYGROUND EQUI
73271
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7855
<�>
$455.55'
137120
06/21/93
$61.00
KOTTOM, TAMMY
CLASS REFUND
060293
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$61.00•
137121
06/21/93
$25.00
KRETZMAN, KIM
REFUND TENNIS
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00"
137122
06/21/93
$84.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
053193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$3,030.60
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
053193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$4,352.70
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
053193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$22.40
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
053193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$7,489.70*
137123
06/21/93
$756.75
KUNDE CO INC
OAK WILT PROGRAM
061093
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
<*>
$756.75*
137124
06/21/93
$25.00
KVASNICK, BARB
VISUAL ARTS
JULY 1
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$25.00*
137125
06/21/93
$429.00
LABOR RELATIONS ASN.
FEE FOR SERVICE
050193
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$429.00*
137126
06/21/93
$119.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
POND TREATMENT
3311
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
7948
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 14
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137126
06/21/93
$235.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
LAKE TREATMENT
3860
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
7903
06/21/93
$3,845.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
1993 LAKE TREATMENT
1021
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
6771
< *>
$4,199.00*
137127
06/21/93
$100.00
LAKEWOOD COMMUNITY C
SERVICES CL
JUNE 21
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
137128
06/21/93
$301.33
LAMOTTE CHEMICAL
TEST CHEMICALS
336982
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPL
7836
<*>
$301.33*
137129
06/21/93
$187.50
LANDRY, STEPHEN
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
LANDRY, STEPHEN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE.DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
5202.50*
137130
06/21/93
$25.00
LANNIN, SARA
CLASS REFUND
060293
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
< *>
$25.00*
137131
06/21/93
$230.75
LAWSON PRODUCTS
RIVET TOOL
1955294
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
7562
06/21'/93
$52.53
LAWSON PRODUCTS
BLADES
1956859
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
6130
06/21/93
$446.30
LAWSON PRODUCTS
DECK SCREWS
1956858
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5971
06/21/93
$255.46
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TY RAPS
1955952
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7443
< *>
$985.04*
137132
06/21/93
$187.50
LAWSON, ROBERT
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15 00
LAWSON. ROBERT
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE .061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
*>
T' 50*
137133
06/21/93
J.33
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
053193
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
06/21/93
;36.64
LEEF BROS. INC.
OFFICE FURNISHINGS
244017
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
<*>
$60.97*
137134
06/21/93
$30.00
LEER., MAUREEN
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137135
06/21/93
$355.11
LEITNER COMPANY
BLACK DIRT
053193
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
7939
< *>
$355.11*
137136
06/21/93
$10.00
LEMEL, BETSY
REFUND PLAYGROUND
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
06/21/93
$5.00
LEMEL, BETSY
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$15.00*
137137
06/21/93
$136.62
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
006430
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$136.62*
137138
06/21/93
$105.00
LINDENSELSER LANDFIL
TREE WASTE
053193
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOV
7639
< *>
$105.00*
137139
06/21/93
$7.19
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
226309
PLANNING
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$7.19
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
226800
PLANNING
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$7.19
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
226798
PLANNING
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$7.19
LINHOFF
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
227024
PLANNING
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$6.88
LINHOFF
PHOTO PROCESSING
233253
PUBLIC HEALTH
PHOTO SUPPLIE
06/21/93
$35.75
LINHOFF
PHOTOS
233428
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET E
< *>
$71.39*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 15
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137140
06/21/93
$187.50
LISK, LEROY
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
LISK, LEROY
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137141
06/21/93
$80.00
LONNING, CAROLYN
PERFORM CL
JUNE 26
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$80.00*
137142
06/21/93
$353.00
LUND, ROBERT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
060293
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES 3494
06/21/93
$39.90
LUND, ROBERT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061193
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$392.90*
137143
06/21/93
$187.50
LUTTS, WILLIAM
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
LUTTS, WILLIAM
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137144
06/21/93
$55.72
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
525610
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$55.72*
137145
06/21/93
$265.15
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
20893
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$452.22
M AMUNDSON
MISC
20937
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$121.12
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
20934
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
-
06/21/93
$201.44
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
21062
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$282.72
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
21101
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$316.95
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
21099
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,639.60*
137146
06/21/93
$250.00
MADSON, JOHN
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH/
JUNE 199
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$250.00*
137147
06/21/93
$187.50
MALONEY, JOHN
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
MALONEY, JOHN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.500*
137148
06/21/93
$391.38
MARGOLIS BROTHERS CO
TREES
14555
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES 7577
< *>
$391.38*
137149
06/21/93
$5,701.30
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$85.30
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$63.80
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$4,922.60
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/5.50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$269.90
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$9,874.34
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$726.45
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/G
GRILL
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$21,643.69*
137150
06/21/93
$300.00
MARTIN - MCALLISTER
ADVERTISING LEGAL
5905
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$300.00*
137151
06/21/93
$128.80
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
061593
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
< *>
$128.80*
137152
06/21/93
$94.16
'MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
060193
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
06/21/93
$379.11
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
ACCESSORIES
060193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
06/21/93
$137.26
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
060193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$112.70
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193/P
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 16
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM,
OBJECT
P.O. •
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137152
08/21/93
$459.00
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
060193/P
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
06/21/93
$2,243.99
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
060193/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$3,426.22*
137153
06/21/93
$474.81
MCNEILUS STEEL
STEEL
0115578
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
7648
< *>
$474.81*
137154
06/21/93
$187.50
MEDZIS, ANDREW
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
MEDZIS, ANDREW
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137155
06/21/93
$100.00
MERFELD, BURT
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137156
06/21/93
$776.24
MERIT SUPPLY
MATTING
32964
GOLF PROG
CLUB HOUSE EQ
06/21/93
$485.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES /VAC
33226
PW BUILDING
EQUIP REPLACE
7647
06/21/93
$488.25
MERIT SUPPLY
VEGETATION KILLER
33233
SIDEWALKS & PA
GENERAL SUPPL
7725
06/21/93
$236.00
MERIT SUPPLY
AQUACLEAN RENTAL
33255
YORK OCCUPANCY
REPAIR PARTS
7739
06/21/93
$414.33
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
33282
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPP
7803.
06/21/93
$153.36
MERIT SUPPLY
SOAP
33297
CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPP
7709
06/21/93
$980.86
MERIT SUPPLY
BATHROOM DOORS
33292
PAINT CAHILL S
CIP
7794
06/21/93
$2,034.15
MERIT SUPPLY
ICE MACHINE
33421
EDINB /CL PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
7942
06/21/93
5303.73
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
33429
ED BUILDING &
CLEANING SUPP
< *>
$5,871.92*
137157
06/21/93
$8.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COOLECTION
19267
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
06/21/93
$285.41
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECTION
19631
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEE
< *>
$293.41*
137158
06/21/93
$87.00
METRO APPLIANCE SERV
REPAIR DISWASHER
04772.1
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS
8111
< *>
$87.00*
137159
06/21/93
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
TRACT SEARCH
370321
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
7932
< *>
$35.00*
137160
06/21/93
$3,712.50
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC CHARGE
MAY 1993
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
06/21/93
$2,227.50
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC CHARGE
APRIL 19
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
06/21/93
$9,652.50
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC CHARGE
MARCH 19
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$15,592.50*
137161
06/21/93
$69.12
METZ BAKING CO
HOT DOG BUNS
060593
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
<*>
$69.12*
-
137162
06/21/93
$52.19
METZGER AQUATIC ENGI
SERVICE CONTRACT
BJJ 2968
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$52.19*
137163
06/21/93
$210.87
MIDLAND NURSERY INC
TREE
010866
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
7880
< *>
$210.87*
137164
06/21/93
$30.88
MIDWAY IND SUPPLY
REPAIR KIT
166262
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPL
7749
< *>
$30.88*
137165
06/21/93
$245.62
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
ASPHALT
9267
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
< *>
$245.62*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 17
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137166
06/21/93
$479.93
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUP
KITCHEN /BATHROOM PAPE
8512
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
7990
<*>
$479.93*
137167
06/21/93
$134.40
MIDWEST VENDING WHOL
CANDY
060493
CLUB HOUSE
CST OF GD FOO
06/21/93
$153.60
MIDWEST VENDING WHOL
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
061193
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
5288.00*
137168
06/21/93
$468.60
MILLERBERND
LIGHTING STANDARD
58146
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
6832
< *>
$468.60*
137169
06/21/93
$1,470.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB
SERVICE REPAIR
030019
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
7745
06/21/93
$815.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB
REPLACE SERVICE
030024
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
7889
06/21/93
$496.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURB
SERVICE LINE REPAIR
030027
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
7958.
< *>
$2,781.00*
137170
06/21/93
$206.90
MINNEGASCO
CONSTRUCTION REPAIR
5863
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$206.90*
137171
06/21/93
$300.00
MINNESOTA P.G.A.
SEMINAR
061493
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$300.00*
137172
06/21/93
$493.31
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQU
1" CURB STOPS
6193
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
7650
< *>
$493.31*
137173
06/21/93
$31.68
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
ORD 1993 -6
9092
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
06/21/93
$52.56
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
ORD 1993 -7
9093
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
06/21/93
$215.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
ADVERTISING
108312
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
06/21/93
$57.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLIC
BIDS CONTRACT 93 -4
9214
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$356.24*
137174
06/21/93
$340.17
MINVALCO
AMLIFIER
3060122
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
7885
< *>
$340.17*
137175
06/21/93
$148.04
MITCHELL INTERNATION
DATA PROCESSING
1213842
EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROCESSI
< *>
$148.04*
137176
06/21/93
$40.00
MN CHAPTER IAAI
1993 DUES
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCR
<*>
$40.00*
137177
06/21/93
$60.00
MN CITY /COUNTY MGMT
DUES
060193
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$60.00*
137178
06/21/93
$90.00
MN CITY /COUNTY MGMT
DUES
060993
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$90.00*
137179
06/21/93
$2,719.00
MN STATE TREA /BLG IN
STATE SURCHARGE
MAY 1993
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERM
< *>
$2,719.00*
137180
06/21/93
$539.24
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
060193
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$400.50
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
060193
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$124.80
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
060193
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,064.54*
137181
06/21/93
$460.08
MN. TORO INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
333447
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
8054
06/21/93
$124.81
MN. TORO INC.
POINTS /CONDENSER /PULL
334310
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7651
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 18
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 4
---------------------=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137181
06/21/93
$80.94
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
339805
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7911
< *>
$665.83*
137182
06/21/93
$74.44
MN. WANNER
HOSE FITTINGS
18756
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
8098
06/21/93
$10.65
MN. WANNER
DRINKING FOUNTAIN REP
18757
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
8097
< *>
$85.09*
137183
06/21/93
$30.00
MOON, PEGGY
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
(30.00*
137184
06/21/93
$90.00
MOTT, LUCY
CLEANING
016312
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
4396
< *>
$90.00*
137185
06/21/93
$114.82
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIP MAINT
511500
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
8030
< *>
$114.82*
137186
06/21/93
$5.77
MS READY
REFUND 6105 JEFFREY L
061493
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
< *>
$5.77*
137187
06/21/93
$650.00
MSP COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
M17249
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
8053
< *>
$650.00*
137188
06/21/93
$188.93
MTS NW SOUND
SPEAKERS
114653
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7351
<*>
$188.93*
137189
06/21/93
$63.37
MUNICILITE CO
POWER PAK
4703
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7726
< *>
$63.37*
137190
06/21/93
$187.50
MYRE, RICHARD
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06'/21/93
$15.00
MYRE, RICHARD
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137191
06/21/93
$30.00
NAISTAT, RICHARD
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137 92
06/21/93
$10.07 NAPA
AUTO PARTS
TOOGLE
899144
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7836
*
*
137193
06/21/93
$196.79
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SY
SECURITY CONTRACT
608588
VERNON OCCUPAN
ALARM SERVICE
06/21/93
$185.37
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SY
SECURITY CONTRACT
608589
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
06/21/93
$146.72
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SY
ALARM SERVICE
608587
ART CENTER BLD
ALARM SERVICE
06/21/93
5944.94
-NATIONAL GUARDIAN SY
ALARM SERVICE
608515
CLUB HOUSE
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$1,473.82*
137194
06/21/93
$183.50
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
176662
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GD F00
7531
06/21/93
$161.11
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
179080
VANVALKENBURG
CST OF GO F00
7531
< *>
$344.61*
137195
06/21/93
$50.00
NELSON, BETSY
REFUND TENNIS
061593
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$50.00*
137196
06/21/93
$625.00
NELSON, J THOMAS
AC INSTRUCTOR
061593
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$625.00*
137197
06/21/93
$100:00
NISSEN, DICK
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46
PM
page 19
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. A
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$100.00*
137198
06/21/93
$80.51
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
553690
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7786
06/21/93
$142.62
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
554600
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7849
06/21/93
$127.78
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
556790
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7912
< *>
$350.91*
137199
06/21/93
$30.60
NORTHERN AIRE
SAFETY
ROPE
6676
POOL ADMIN
SAFETY EQUIPM
< *>
$30.60*
137200
06/21/93
$55.52
NORTHERN AIRGAS
OXYGEN
21345
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
5500
< *>
$55.52*
137201
06/21/93
$16,449.25
NORTHERN IRRIGATION
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
PYMT $2
GC CIP
CIP
< *>
$16,449.25*
137202
06/21/93
$1,300.00
NORTHERN LIGHTER
PYR
4TH OF
JULY FIREWORKS
062193
FIREWORKS
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$2,350.00
NORTHERN LIGHTER
PYR
4TH OF
JULY FIREWORKS
062193
FIREWORKS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$3,650.00*
137203
06/21/93
$3,650.00
NORTHERN LIGHTER
PYR
4TH OF
JULY FIREWORKS
JULY 4
FIREWORKS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$3,650.00*
137204
06/21/93
$86.22
NORTHERN
REPAIR
PARTS
622544BI
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7783
< *>
$86.22*
137205
06/21/93
$383.04
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
053193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$248.10
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
053193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$381.60
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
053193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$1,012.74*
137206
06/21/93
$364.44
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES
NW526
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES& TUBES
< *>
$364.44*
137207
06/21/93
$293.87
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$17.37
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$144.34
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$24.84
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$551.38
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$104.13
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$7.16
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$214.36
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$1,213.22
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$192.49
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
GUN RANGE
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$296.58
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$513.80
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$38.25
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
GOLF DOME
LIGHT & POWER
06/21/93
$7,088.38
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
062193
ED BUILDING &
LIGHT & POWER
< *>
$10,700.17*
137208
06/21/93
$10.00
NULTY, MAB
REFUND
TENNIS
061593
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$10.00*
137209
06/21/93
O.M. SCOTT & SONS
CO
FERTILIZER
0439411
MAINT OF COURS
FERTILIZER
8120
0.
$367.43 *
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 20
CHECKS
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137210
06/21/93
$499.49
OFFICE MAX
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
061493
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLI
< *>
$499.49*
137211
06/21/93
$226.20
OLD DUTCH FOODS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
052893
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$226.20*
137212
06/21/93
$343.46
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
RATCHET
PULLER
136596
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
7737
< *>
$343.46*
137213
06/21/93
$244.25
OPM INFORMATION SYST
HARDRIVE
INSTALL
198231
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
$244.25*
137214
06/21/93
5111.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
255473
CLUB HOUSE
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COOKIES
255542
GRILL
CST OF GD FOO
< *>
$185.00*
137215
06/21/93
$432.99
OWENS SERVICE CO
CONT REPAIRS
74282
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
8051
06/21/93
$597.00
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE
CONTRACT
74464
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQU
< *>
!1,029.99*
137216
06/21/93
$50.00
PALOMINO
GIFT CERTIFICATE
060993
HUMAN RELATION
EDUCATION PRG
< *>
$50.00*
137217
06/21/93
$27.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
31993
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$39.90
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
32289
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$27.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
32292
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$94.90*
137218
06/21/93
$52.19
PC EXPRESS /PC TRONIC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
34713
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
7988
< *>
$52.19*
137219
06/21/93
$39.19
PEDERSON, EDWARD
SUMMER
SEMINAR
JUNE
ASSESSING
CONF & SCHOOL
< *>
$39.19*
137220
06/21/93
$479.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
POP
053193
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD FOO
06/21/93
$1,342.50
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
FO
053193/G
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$324.35
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$321.80
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$155.25
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$2,622.90*
137221
06/21/93
$458.70
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CO
DAMAGE
SOD BY CREEK
061493
GENERAL TURF C
SOD & DIRT
06/21/93
53,051.10
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CO
SOD & GRADE
ARNESON
P
061493
PARKS
CIP
7857
06/21/93
$4,600.00
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CO
CONSTR.
IN PROGRESS
061493
PARKS
CIP
< *>
$8,109.80*
137222
06/21/93
$900.00
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
FEE FOR
SERVICE
0111704
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
06/21/93
$2,055.00
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
PROF SERVICES
JI14423
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,955.00*
-
137223
06/21/93
$21.25
PFEIFFER, POLLY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
060793
POOL CONCESSIO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$21.25*
137224
06/21/93
$100.00
PHYSIO CONTROL
LIFEPAK
CABLE
A76683
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
7253
< *>
$100.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 21
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=----------------
137225
06/21/93
$1,011.75
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
PRINTING OF CARDS
19368
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7864
06/21/93
$745.50
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
SIGNS
1936A
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7862
06/21/93
$102.24
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3224
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$101.18
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1828
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$1,960.67*
137226
06/21/93
$138.98
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
12956
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
7945
< *>
$138.98*
137227
06/21/93
$420.00
PIPE SERV CORP
T.V. STORM SEWERS
93 -0018
GENERAL STORM
CONTR REPAIRS
06/21/93
$210.00
PIPE SERV CORP
STORM SEWER INSP
93 -0023
PONDS & LAKES
CONTR REPAIRS
8085
< *>
$630.00*
137228
06/21/93
$345.57
PLANT EQUIPMENT
BUTTERFLY VALVE /WELL
14989
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
7664
< *>
$345.57*
137229
06/21/93
$33.12
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
566591
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$33.12*
137230
06/21/93
$488.30
PONY EXPRESS RELOADE
AMMUNITION
060993
RESERVE PROGRA
MEETING EXPEN
< *>
$488.30*
137231
06/21/93
$5,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
061593
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$5,000.00*
137232
06/21/93
$1,329.63
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO
ASPHALT CUTTER
6493
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACE
7663
<*>
$1,329.63*
.
137233
06/21/93
$338.47
PRAIRIE RESTORATION
WILDFLOWER SEEDS
060493
STREET IMPROV.
CIP
7994
< *>
$338.47*
137234
06/21/93
$27.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
SHARPENING
85602
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$27.00*
137235
06/21/93
$195.33
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LAUNDRY
97731
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
99877
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
*
< >
$220.57*
137236
06/21/93
$6600i.47
PRO PRINT & GRAPHICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4501
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
7073
137237
06/21/93
$71.85
QUALITY WINE
BEER
092344
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$71.85
QUALITY WINE
BEER
092339
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$42.52
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
094486
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$119.75
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
094487
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$71.85
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
094475
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
<*>
$377.82*
137238
06/21/93
$130.48*
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTER
58719
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
7807
137239
06/21/93
$140.58
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
48047
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
8110
< *>
$140.58*
137240
06/21/93
$499.00
RADIO AAHS
ADVERTISING /CL
061193
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN
16, 1993, 10:46
PM
page 22
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. 1!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$499.00*
137241
06/21/93
$40.00
RAKES, PENELOPE
REFUND TENNIS
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$40.00*
137242
06/21/93
$191.90
RECREONICS
ADAPT REC SWIM EQUIP
0013729
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7705
< *>
$191.90*
137243
06/21/93
$251.60
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
00260
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPM
06/21/93
$106.25
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
00260
PUMP &'LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPM
06/21/93
$104.55
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
00260
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPM
06/21/93
$106.25
RED WING SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00260
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$568.65*
137244
06/21/93
$115.66
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3116
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$475.14
REM SUPPLIES
BULBS
3065
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$331.80
REM SUPPLIES
TRASH CAN COVERS
3117
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPL
7930
06/21/93
$297.23
REM SUPPLIES
ICE MOLDS
3123
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPL
8200
< *>
$1,219.83*
137245
06/21/93
$6,545.05
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$91.10
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$45.30
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$5,760.75
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$7,399.15
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$255.00
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
060193/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$20,096.35*
137246
06/21/93
RICHARDS, BRIAN
PERFORM CL
JUNE 26
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
*
$85.00*
137247
06/21/93
$106.45
RITEWAY MOTOR PARTS
JACK
168556
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7804
< *>
5106.45*
137248
06/21/93
$39.05
RITZ CAMERA
FILM PROCESSING
3756934
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPL
7448
06/21/93
$58.39
RITZ CAMERA
PHOTO DEVELOPING
3759398
STORM SEWER
CIP
7621
06/21/93
$6.49
RITZ CAMERA
PHOTO DEVELOPING
3759398
STORM SEWER
CIP
06/21/93
$6.49
RITZ CAMERA
PHOTO DEVELOPING
3759398
STORM SEWER
CIP
06/21/93
$6.48
RITZ CAMERA
PHOTO DEVELOPING
3759398
STORM SEWER
CIP
< *)
$116.90*
137249
06/21/93
$87.30
ROAD RESCUE
GLOVE POUCHES
137113
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUP
7249
< *>
$87.30*
137250
06/21/93
$426.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
53034
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPL
8023
< *>
$426.00*
137251
06/21/93
$6,077.18
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
13697
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
8061
< *>
$6,077.18*
137252
08/21/93
$187.50
ROTHE, ALLEN
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
ROTHE, ALLEN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493.
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137253
06/21/93
$25.00
RULLMAN, RENAE
REFUND TENNIS
060893
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 23
CHECK*
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$25.00*
137254
06/21/93
$187.50
RUNNING, PATRICK
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
RUNNING, PATRICK
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137255
06/21/93
$5.46
S.T. ROBB
BOLTS
004153
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7875
< *>
$5.46*
137256
06/21/93
$445.00
SAFETY KLEEN
ANALYS
P93720
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
6894
06/21/93
$265.00
SAFETY KLEEN
HAZ WASTE DISP
M48433
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DI
6894
< *>
$710.00*
137257
06/21/93
$10.78
SAMMONS, SABRINA
MILEAGE
061493
POOL ADMIN
MILEAGE
< *>
$10.78*
137258
06/21/93
$187.50
SAMUELSON, RONALD
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
SAMUELSON, RONALD
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
601493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$$15.50*
137259
06/21/93
$77.22
SCHARBER & SONS
REPAIR PARTS
75816
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7522
< *>
$77..22*
137260
06/21/93
$30.00
SCHARTON, YOLANDA
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137261
06/21/93
$187.50
SCHEERER, MARTIN
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
SCHEERER, MARTIN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137262
06/21/93
$60.00
SCHULLER, PAULINE
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$60.00*
137263
06/21/93
$188.73
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
BAKERY
060193
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
< *>
$188.73*
137264
06/21/93
$120.00
SEIDEL, ROXANNE
SERVICES EDINBOROUGH/
JUNE 199
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$120.00*
137265
06/21/93
$50.00
SHANNON, JIM
SERVICES CL
JUNE 27
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$50.00*
.PROGRA
137266
06/21/93
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137267
06/21/93
$87.60
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
4939 -8
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PAINT
7992
< *>
$87.60*
137268
06/21/93
$57.85
SHIRLEY, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060893
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$112.07
SHIRLEY, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060893
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$69.95
SHIRLEY, TOM
PLANTS
060893
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SH
06/21/93
$78.46
SHIRLEY, TOM
MILEAGE OR.ALLOWANCE
061493
ED ADMINISTRAT
MILEAGE
< *>
$318.33*
137269
06/21/93
$324.46
SIEMS, JEFFERY
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 24
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$324.46*
137270
06/21/93
$187.50
SINGLETON, JAMES
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
SINGLETON, JAMES
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137271
06/21/93
$444.33*
SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT
SMOKE FLUID GENERATOR
139036
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPL
7256
137272
06/21/93
$187.50
SMEGAL, GREGORY
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
SMEGAL, GREGORY
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
1'37?73
06/21/93
$184.00
SOLBAKKEN
ART CENTER WORKSHOP
061.593
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
1.1>
$184.00*
137274
06/21/93
$122.10
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM
AD FOR BID PW RE -ROOF
CPCO2565
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING L
< *>
$122.10*
137275
06/21/93
$64.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$4,363.35
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$13,594.85
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
06/21/93
$107.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$18,130.20*
137276
06/21/93
$6,648.57
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN C
THIRD QUARTER
060193
COMMUNICATIONS
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$6,648.57*
137277
06/21/93
$55.96
SPS
GASKETS FOR PARNELL L
2031331
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
7415
06/21/93
$12.47
SPS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
2034680
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
7418
06/21/93
SPS
BULB
2040662
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
7658
*
< >
$514.12*
137278
06/21/93
$855.00
STAR TRIBUNE
PRINTING
053193
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
< *>
$855.00*
137279
06/21/93
$89.45
STREICHERS
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
66904.1
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$251.61
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
65857.2
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
7487
< *>
$341.06*
137280
06/21/93
$2,588.02
STRGAR- ROSCOE-FAUSH
PROF ENG SERVICES
7/092175
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,588.02*
137281
06/21/93
$187.50
STRUZYK, JOSEPH
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
STRUZYK, JOSEPH
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
*
< >
$$15.50 *
137282
06/21/93
$13.06
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SHAFT ASM
186582
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/21/93
$7.03
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
PAINT
186637
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/21/93
$14.25
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SWITCH
186721
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
06/21/93
$20.16
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
MODULE
186778
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$54.50*
137283
06/21/93
$100.04*
SUPERAMERICA
GAS
051693
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 25
CHECK#
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. #
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137284
06/21/93
$100.00
SWANSON,.HAROLD
POLICE SERVICE
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137285
06/21/93
$372.28
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
060193
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
06121/93
$2,808.03
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
COST OF GOODS SOLD FO
060193
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
06/21/93
$176.37
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
CLEANING SUPPLIES
060193
GRILL
CLEANING SUPP
< *>
$3,356.68*
137286
06/21/93
$111.72
TAPE DIST OF MN
VIDEO TAPE
25668
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
7486
06/21/93
$21.93
TAPE DIST OF MN
VIDEO TAPE
25725
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$133.65*
137287
06/21/93
$120.08
TARGET
SUPPLIES
060593
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
S120.08*
137288
06/21/93
$61.88
TARGET
FRAMES
00450715
CITY COUNCIL
GENERAL SUPPL
7162
06/21/93
$118.95
TARGET
VIDEO /PHOTO SUPPLIES
00458785
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIE
< *>
$180.83*
137289
06/21/93
$479.25
TERRY ANN SALES CO
PAPER CUPS
1295
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$479.25*
137290
06/21/93
$83.54
TESSMAN SEED INC
TOOLS
9647
TREES & MAINTE
TOOLS
7952
< *>
$83.54*
137291
06/21/93
5300.00
THE BOOMERS
SERVICES CL
JUNE 23
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$300.00*
137292
06/21/93
$350.64
THE HOWE COMPANY
FERTILIZER
I749586
CENTENNIAL LAK
FERTILIZER
7696
. < *>
$350.64*
137293
06/21/93
$59.11
THE KANE SERVICE
PROF SERVICES
4792627
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$59.11*
137294
06/21/93
$110.00
THORNDIKE, KEITH
REFUND /DOME
061493
GOLF PROG
MEMBERSHIPS
< *>
$110.00*
137295
06/21/93
$28.00
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
052893/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
06/21/93
$3,545.30
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
052893/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BE
< *>
$3,573.30*
137298
06/21/93
$187.50
TODD, DARRELL
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
TODD, DARRELL
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061593
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$202.50*
137297
06/21/93
$29.03
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
224339
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
7910
< *>
$29.03*
137298
06/21/93
$38.53
TOOLS BY OLSEN
CUTTER HEAD /ENGINE OI
51340
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7701
06/21/93
$154.85
TOOLS BY OLSEN
REPAIR PARTS
51512
MAINT OF COORS
REPAIR PARTS
7784
06/21/93
$38.87
TOOLS BY OLSEN
REPAIR PARTS
51513
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7685
06/21/93
$41.83
TOOLS BY OLSEN
REPAIR PARTS
51603
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
7848
< *>
5274.08*
137299
06/21/93
$11,446.34
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTE
STORE #1
STORE #1
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN
16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 26
CHECKS
=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. S
<*>
!11,446.34"
137300
06/21/93
$274.39
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
PLAYGROUND ARTS /CRAFT
72639
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPL
7409
< *>
$274.39*
137301
06/21/93
$16.00
TUFTS UNIVERSITY
SUBSCRIPTION
050593
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCR
< *>
$16.00*
137302
06/21/93
$105.22
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOD
REPLACE PARTS
.18308
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
7644
< *>
$105.22*
137303
06/21/93
$63.11
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
050693
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MI
< *>
$63.11*
137304
06/21/93
$188.00
UHL CO
QUARTERLY CALIBRATION
67143
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
7837
< *>
$188.00*
137305
06/21/93
$66.10
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM - PRESTRUD
406925
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
7258
06/21/93
$65.25
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
VESTS
407247
50TH ST OCCUPA
PROF SERVICES
7460
06/21/93
$15.98
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
MOURNING BADGES
104353
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$1,149.92
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.98
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
$639.40
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
RESERVE PROGRA
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$134.74
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061193
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
- $15.98
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED-
GENERAL SUPPLIES
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPL
06/21/93
- $61.15
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$0.90
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
-$209.90
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$1,801.24*
137306
06/21/93
$15.04
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
CORD ELEC
67SI 239
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPL
7637
< *>
$15.04*
137307
06/21/93
$120.00
UNITED STATES TENNIS
JR TEAM TENNIS MEMBER
060793
TENNIS INSTRUC
GENERAL SUPPL
< *>
$120.00*
137308
06/21/93
$25.60
US WEST CELLULAR
PHONE BILL
051093
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCR
06/21/93
$113.73
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
060193
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
< *>
$139.33*
137309
06/21/93
$53.78
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
DARE
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$4,461.83
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$174.72 'US
WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$56.39
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$155.81
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$557.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$65.78
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$137.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$478.57
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$1.05
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
GUN RANGE
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$97.27
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE
06/21/93
$142.06
US WEST COMMUNICATIO
TELEPHONE
062193
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
< *>
$6,382.86*
137310
06/21/93
$2,400.00
USAQUATICS
POOL MAIN. CONTRACT
10034
POOL OPERATION
SALARIES REG
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM
page 27
CHECK*
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
P.O. *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
137310
06/21/93
$300.00
USAQUATICS
POOL FILTER
10035
POOL CIP
CIP
< *>
$2,700.00*
137311
06/21/93
$468.07
VAN PAPER CO.
KITCHEN /BATHRM PAPER
461856
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIE
7843
06/21/93
$1,649.67
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER CUPS
454369
GRILL
CST OF GD F00
6779
06/21/93
.$306.60
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER CUPS
454369
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD F00
6779
06/21/93
$102.20
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER CUPS
454369
POOL CONCESSIO
CST OF GD F00
6779
06/21/93
$125.94
VAN PAPER CO.
MATCHES
462790
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
3498
06/21/93
$125.95
VAN PAPER CO.
ADVERTISING OTHER
462790
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
3498
06/21/93
$125.94
VAN PAPER CO.
ADVERTISING OTHER
462790
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
3498
06/21/93
$461.58
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
462468
50TH ST SELLIN
PAPER SUPPLIE
7796
06/21/93
$1,414.30
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
462489
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIE
7796
06/21/93
$597.47
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
462492
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIE
7796
<*>
$5,377.72*
137312
06/21/93
$60.00
VANKAMPEN, DONNA
PERFORM CL
JUNE 26
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$60.00*
137313
06/21/93
$326.00
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
WIRING FIRE ALARM
12542
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQU
7464
< *>
$326.00*
137314
06/21/93
$3,950.00
VEAP
PROF SERVICES
060293
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,950.00*
137315
06/21/93
$187.50
VERNON. RICHARD
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE /2N
060393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
06/21/93
$15.00
VERNON. RICHARD
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
061493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
<*>
$202.50*
137316
06/21/93
$197.83
VOSS LIGHTING
LIGHT FIXTURE
224265
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
7386
06/21/93
$112.98
VOSS LIGHTING
LIGHTING
224451
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
7755
06/21/93
$203.13
VOSS LIGHTING
LIGHTING PARTS
224646
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPL
7866
<*>
$513.944
137317
06/21/93
$25,159.02
W.B. MILLER INC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
93 -3 PYM
STORM SEWER
CIP
< *>
$25,159.02*
137318
06/21/93
$88.83
W.W. GRAINGER
MIN SUMP PUMP
498 -6254
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPL
7752
<*>
$88.83*
137319
06/21/93
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
<*>
$100.00*
137320
06/21/93
$25.00
WARNER, SUE
REFUND TENNIS
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
<*>
$25.00*
137321
06/21/93
$90.00
WERT, CAPRICE
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
016314
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQU
4397
<*>
$90.00*
137322
06/21/93
$30.00
WILLIAMS, GERARD
REFUND SWIMMING
061493
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
< *>
$30.00*
137323
06/21/93
$100.00
WROBLESKI, HENRY
POLICE SERVICES
JUNE 199
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
137324
06/21/93
$961.53 '
XEROX CORP
MAINT CHARGE
03763575
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP RENTAL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, JUN 16, 1993, 10:46 PM page 28
CHECK* DATE CHECK AMOUNT----- - - - - -- VENDOR------------ - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - -- INVOICE PROGRAM -- OBJECT P.O. 4
----------------------------- -- -- ----- ------ ----- -- - - - - -- ------------------
< *> $961.53"
137325 06/21/93 $123.97 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 54187263 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPM
<�> $123.97'
$1,371,330.38"
COUNCIL
CHECK SUMMARY
WED, JUN 16, 1993, 11:02 PM page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND #
10
$541,774.36
FUND #
11
$35.00
FUND #
12
$6,817.97
FUND #
15
$6,260.20
FUND #
23
$3,382.92
FUND #
26
$6,820.05
FUND #
27
$476,589.62
FUND #
28
$71,068.46
FUND #
29
$266.87
FUND #
30
$31,610.65
FUND #
40
$16,842.01
FUND #
41
$4,990.71
FUND #
42
$37,998.36
FUND #
50
$119,524.40
FUND #
60
$34,223.80
FUND #
66
$13,125.00
$1,371,330.38*