HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-20_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 20, 1993
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *)-and.in_ bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to
be routine and will be enacted by one - motion. There will be no separate discussion of
such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its_ normal sequence
of the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of December 6, 1993
I. *..._ - -iI:- PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 12/16/93 Total: $15,772.54
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Council Meeting of December 6, 1993 and Special Council
Meeting of December 8, 1993
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of
all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
* A. Aneal of Zoning Board of Appeals Decision - Variance from Code Section
850.17, Subd. 11 to Allow Development of Platted Lot Without Required 30
Feet of Frontage (Continue to 01/03/94)
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Pubic comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Easement for Street Right of Way - Lot 1, Block 1, Davies First Addition
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass.
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass. -
A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -12 - To Name Roadway from Braemar
Boulevard to the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse "John Harris Drive"
B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -13 - Amending Edina Code Section 185
Schedule A to Increase Certain Fees and to Add Certain Fees
C. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1993 -14 - Amending Edina Code Section_ 1000 to
-Prohibit Intentional Feeding of Deer
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 20, 1993
Page Two
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. One Ton, Four Wheel Drive Pick -Up
* B. 5,000 Dozen Range Balls
* C. Golf Course Fertilizer
* D. Computer Upgrade - Engineering Department
* E. 1994 Public Health Nursing .Services Contract
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Public Hearing - Deer Population Management Plan
* B. -Approval of Traffic Safety Staff Report
* C. Feasibility Report - Lighting Improvement L -37 - Virginia Av/Virginia Ln
Set Hearing Date (01/18/93)
D. Appointments to Human Relations. Commission and Recycling & Solid Waste
Commission
E. Council /Advisory Boards & Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting
F. Volunteers' Annual Recognition
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XI. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 12/16/93 Total: $1,850,624.41 and
for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 12/09/93 Total: $579,262.09
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED
Wed Dec 29 Year End Council Meeting 5:00 P.M. Manager's Conf Rm
Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S DAY OBSERVED - CITY HALL CLOSED
Mon Jan 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
Mon Jan 17 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues Jan 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
Mon Feb 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues Feb 22 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
Sat Feb 26 LWV Family Field Trip to City Hall 2 -4 P.M. Council Room
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 6, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,
and Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Rice and was
seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1993, APPROVED Notion was made by
Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA
Minutes of November 15, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by
Commissioner Kelly to approve payment of HRA claims as shorn in detail on the
Check Register dated December 2, 1993, and consisting of one page totalling
$21,299.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16 1993 01:52:07 Page 1
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93_ 512.00 BORN, CAROL PARKING REFUND 385 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT
012517 $12.00"
12/20/93 $15,760.54 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY T COUNTY ADM FEE 112993 GRANDVIEW MISC
012518 $15,760.54"
$15,772.54
It
c
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 6, 1993
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented,
with the exception of removal of item W.A. - Collection of Garbage Refuse - City
Properties.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15. 1993 AND SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 1.
1993 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve the minutes of the regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1993, and the
minutes of the Special Council Meeting of December 1, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD: STORM SERER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -226 (MCCAULEY TRAIL POND)
ORDERED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Presentation by Engineer
Engineer Hoffman recalled that on November 1, 1993, the Council heard a staff
presentation on neighbors' concerns regarding flooding potential along McCauley
Trail Pond. Staff and neighbors had discussed the proposed project which would
result in a lower normal water level and reduction in inflow during high -
intensity rainfall events. After reviewing the issue on November 1, 1993, the
Council set a public hearing for December 6, 1993, to receive input from all
abutting property owners.
The proposed STS -226 storm sewer improvement would:
1. Lower normal pond elevation
2. Isolate the park area east of Gleason Road
3. Control pond bounce by pump system
Engineer Hoffman said that the estimated project cost would be $6,000.00 and
staff would recommend a financing split as follows:
50% stormwater utility
50% special assessment against 12 benefitted properties
The project would also require approval of the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR). DNR staff has indicated that the proposed project could receive a
favorable review if the intent was to lower flood potential, and was not done for
aesthetics. Other side issues are water quality and lowering the pond to a level
that would encourage growth of cattails. The DNR has been told that some
dredging of silt on the east end would be needed.
The 12 property owners who would be benefitted were noticed of the public
hearing. Two high ground properties on Timber Ridge were also noticed for
information purposes only but would not be viewed as benefitted properties for
assessment purposes. The 12 properties are proposed to be assessed on a range of
$250.00 to $375.00 per dwelling unit. Staff has received one favorable response.
If approved by Council, the project would be done in late winter or early spring,
subject to the DNR permit.
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the following issues: 1) should
the project be undertaken or not, and 2) if ordered, how should the project be
financed.
Public Comment
Arley Bjella, 6543 McCauley Trail, said that on behalf of ten of the 12 affected
property owners, they felt the proposed project would help solve what they
consider to be a very serious problem.
Ed Noonan, 6400 Timber Ridge, stated that even though his property does not abut
the pond, he has use of a 15 foot stretch of land.to access the pond from Jeff
Gustafson who owns the abutting property. Mr. Noonan agreed that the problem is
serious and he would like to see it resolved. He suggested that all property
owners in Timber Ridge would benefit because they have view of the pond. His
concern would be water quality if the pond level were lowered, but he agreed that
isolating the park area east of Gleason Road would be good. Mr. Noonan observed
that, while, that area is not the total water source for the pond, it should be
estimated what such control would do to lower the flood potential without the
pump system.
Mayor Richards commented that, although aesthetics are important, the focus is on
the pond hydraulics as it relates to flood capacity. As to other options, staff
and the watershed district have looked at the project and recommend it as
proposed. He added that the time is ripe for this to proceed before further
flooding occurs.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. subject
to Department of Natural Resources approval, with intent to assess 50% of project
cost to benefitted properties and fund 50% from the Stormwater Utility Fund:
RESOLUTION ORDERING STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -226 '
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to
owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following
proposed improvement:
STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -226
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the
construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary
in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessay easements and rights for
construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as:
STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -226
and the area to be specially assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvement shall include: Lot 1 thr 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition and
Lot 1, Block 1, The Timbers.
Motion called for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
HEARING ON APPEAL OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION FOR VARIANCE FOR SATELLITE
ANTENNA AT 5712 DEVILLE DRIVE CONTINUED TO 01103/94
Presentation by Planner
Associate Planner Aaker explained that the subject property is located on the
west side of DeVille Drive, south of Stauder Circle and north of Biscayne
Boulevard. The homeowner is proposing to install a 10 foot diameter black mesh
satellite dish antenna near the south side of the house on an extended pole mount
to obtain an overall height of 17 feet. According to the antenna installer,
trees along the rear and south sideyard property boundaries block access to
satellite reception with the exception of the proposed south sideyard extended
pole mount location. There are a number of trees on neighboring properties to
the south, southwest and west which apparently block signals. Ms. Aaker
presented graphics illustrating front and side elevations of the proposed dish
antenna, proximity to sideyard property boundary and the mature trees.
Edina Code Section 815, which addresses radio and television antennas and towers
states the following: Dish antennas shall only be located in the rearyard area
(815.06, Subd. 7, A.2.), and Dish antennas shall not be in excess of 12 feet in
height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the dish (815.07,
Subd. 1, C).
At its meeting of November 18, 1993, the Zoning Board of Appeals denied the
variance request to locate a satellite dish antenna in the sideyard area of the
residential lot with the proposed height of 17 feet. The Board indicated they
were sympathetic to the applicant, however, they were unclear whether adequate
signals could be received in a conforming location. Also, that they found it
difficult to approve a variance that would create a hardship for immediate
neighbors due to the negative visual impact created.
Mayor Richards asked if the property owner was present, who had applied for the
variance and who had appealed the decision. Attorney Gilligan stated that the
applicant for the variance was James E. Aufderheide and that the letter of appeal
was signed by Jim Aufderheide, Aufderworld Corporation. Jim Aufderheide said he
was representing Mike Yurecko, the owner of the subject property. The question
was raised by Council as to whether the matter was properly before the Council
and if Mr. Aufderheide could speak for the property owner who was not in
attendance.
Mayor Richards called for comment on the issue of procedure. Mr. Aufderheide
affirmed that he was operating as agent for the property owner in this matter.
Michael Lansky, 5717 DeVille Drive, stated that he lived directly across from the
subject property. He said he did not believe the property owner needed to be
present and that the owner had not appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals
either. Mr. Lansky said he and another neighbor were prepared to have the appeal
heard and decided, that the hearing should be proceed as if the property owner
chose not to appear and that the Council hear testimony from affected parties.
Wayne Salita, 5713 Continental Drive, told Council that four neighbors were
present who wanted to speak to the appeal. He suggested that the Council should
take the issue of proper procedure under advisement but hear the comments of the
neighbors. Subsequently, if the Council finds that the matter does not have
standing, it should then be dismissed.
Following discussion by the Council on the issue of procedure, Mayor Richards
then ruled that public testimony would be heard on the matter of the appeal.
Presentation by Permit Applicant
Jim Aufderheide, 5325 W. 62nd Street, stated he was appearing on behalf of the
property owner, Mike Yurecko, 5712 DeVille Drive. Mr. Aufderheide said he did
not encourage the homeowner to attend the meeting as he did not feel it was
necessary. He told Council that at the Board of Review meeting there was some
question as to whether the satellites could be viewed from other locations in the
yard or whether the spot selected would get all of the satellites. To better
illustrate the -case, he submitted photos depicting various views -from the -
proposed satellite dish location and signal obstruction due to mature trees. He
said all backyard locations that conform to the City Code are prevented from
l
receiving the majority of programs.
Mayor Richards asked what the maximum number of channels would be if the dish
were placed within Code requirements. Mr. Aufderheide-responded that there are
22 satellites producing 200 channels. If the antenna were placed to conform to
Code, because of the variables, the maximum number of channels that could be
received would be approximately 20.
Member Kelly asked why the owner feels the need for receiving most of the 200
channels. Mr. Aufderheide.explained the proponent had the dish antenna at his
previous home and brought it with when his family moved to Deville Drive. His
interests are hockey which is on about six satellites and also the entertainment
channels.
Member Paulus asked Mr. Aufderheide if he had ever approached a homeowner to
remove trees so that the dish antenna could be located within the Code and if
this had been discussed with the property owner in this case. In response,
Mr. Aufderheide pointed out that the two largest trees that would block most of
the signals are not on the owner's property. Continuing, Member Paulus asked, if
in interpreting the FCC rules, homeowners are told it is their right to receive
the signals. Mr. Aufderheide said as an installer they look for the best
location in each case and if the homeowner concurs and there are obstructions the
homeowner is told that a variance will be needed. Mayor Richards interjected
that it is unrealistic to expect to receive all available channels.
Member Paulus commented that, as a previous dish owner, the homeowner knew
something about satellite dishes and that trees are a major obstacle in receiving
signals. She asked Mr. Aufderheide if, in a case like this where there are
obstacles such as trees, he informs the homeowner that there will be problems or
does he say let's go for a variance because we can push the FCC rules.
Responding, Mr. Aufderheide said his company was asked to move the dish from the
previous home to the subject property. Member Paulus stated she would like the
record to show that, one of the problems in not having the proponent present, was
that she would have questioned the proponent that they must have known before
they purchased the subject property that the trees would be a problem when
installing the satellite dish.
Member Rice asked what.the criteria was for granting variances. Associate
Planner quoted from the City Code as follows: "The Board shall not grant a
petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this
Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
petitioner's property and that grant of said variances is in keeping with the
spirit and intent of this Section. 'Undue hardship' means that: (i) the property
in question cannot be put to reasonable use as allowed by this Section, (ii) the
plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's
property which were not created by the petitioner, and (iii) the variance, if
granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its
surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue
hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms
of this Section."
Public Comment
Matt Pfohl, 5716 DeVille Drive, told Council that his home is next door to where
the satellite dish will be located. He presented photos illustrating the
magnitude of the satellite dish size and a view of the property line and existing
trees. He said the trees will continue to grow in height and the property owner
may be back in future years asking to extend the dish height to 20 or 23 feet.
Mr. Pfohl said the ordinance requirements are there for two reasons: 1) aesthetic
purposes (to hide the dish from the street), and 2) by limiting the antenna
location to a small envelope in the backyard it will eliminate repeated requests
for variances because of future tree growth. Mr. Pfohl said that if the variance
is granted his parents may plant a large tree in front of the dish. In
conclusion, he said the applicant's word is being used to determine whether this
is the single and only location for placement of the satellite dish. Mr. Pfohl
said he viewed this as a conflict of interest and the Council should not rely
solely upon the applicant's opinion.
Wayne Salita, 5713 Continental Drive, explained that the three trees bordering
the proponent's backyard are his. He told Council that the subject homeowners
bought the property on Memorial Day and a few days thereafter the large antenna
dish was laid on the ground between the subject home and that of the Pfohls. He
said he did not want to see the dish even if it were legal, for sure if it needs
a variance, and particularly if it is just to watch hockey games. Mr. Salita
elaborated that the satellite dish would not be in keeping with the neighborhood
or Edina as a whole, would affect the value of homes in the area and is ungodly.
Mr. Salita said the proponent is not denied free speech, he has approximately 14
channels on cable, radio, and the newspaper so he is being denied nothing. No
good will.come from the variance - only economic hardship for all the neighboring
property owners. He submitted that Mr. Aufderheide has a vested interest for
granting of the variance. In conclusion, Mr. Salita asked the Council to deny
the requested variance.
Michael Lansky, 5717 DeVille Drive, said that while he is sympathetic to persons
who want to receive satellite signals, in this case two variances are requested:
1) height relief, and 2) location relief. He pointed out the location variance
creates the most onerous situation for the neighbors. The issue here is
aesthetic degradation and whether the burden of that degradation should lie
primarily on the neighbors or on the homeowner. The chosen location chosen for
the dish antenna would move the degradation as much as possible on the residents
surrounding the homeowner. Mr. Lansky said the FCC rules state that a homeowner
is entitled to receive a signal. FCC rules are not applicable to this Council
until such time as the courts say that they are. Assuming the courts say the
rules apply, the issue becomes 'reasonableness' i.e. the burden on the homeowner
has to be greater than on everyone else if all things are equal. He suggested
that perhaps this issue may have been resolved if the homeowner had talked with
the neighbors. Further, no homeowner can receive all channels from all 22
satellites. In conclusion, Mr. Lansky said this is a question of balancing the
burden; the burden on the homeowner or the burden on the surrounding neighbors.
He suggested that the homeowner look at what is the best location within the
permitted area and if a variance is still needed it should be for height not
location because the backyard is still the least onerous to the majority of
neighbors.
Mayor Richards noted that written objections to granting of the variance have
been received from Robert, Janet, David and Shannon Sullivan, 6409 Biscayne
Boulevard and James D. Leary, 5716 Camelback Drive.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards said that any decision on the variance request would be premature
without hearing from the proponent. He suggested the matter be continued so that
further information could be provided in response to issues raised by the
Council. Further, that specific findings should be drafted for consideration by
the Council.
Member Smith commented that he had heard nothing that said the qualifying
location is unreasonable, that this does not fall within the FCC rules and that
he would support denying the variance.
Attorney Gilligan interjected that draft findings should be prepared for review
and consideration by the Council before any action is taken.
Member Smith made a motion to close the public hearing and to direct staff to
prepare draft findings for denial of the variance request for review and
consideration by the Council on January 3, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.
Member Rice said he would not support the motion because, although testimony was
taken as a courtesy from the affected neighbors present, he felt the hearing
should be continued so that the homeowner could be present. Mayor Richards said
he concurred and asked that the City Attorney give an opinion as to whether the
appeal was properly before the Council.
Ayes: Kelly, Smith
Nays: Paulus, Rice, Richards
Motion failed.
Mayor Richards then made a motion to continue the public hearing on the variance
request to January 3, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Smith
Motion carried.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 7023 AND 7029 DOWN ROAD Motion was made by Member.Rice
and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
PARCEL 1:
Lot 2, Block 1, TUCKERS PROSPECT HILLS, according to the plat thereof on
file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL 2:
That part of Lot 15, PROSPECT HILLS, described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 15; thence East along the South
line of Lot 15, a distance of 140.93 feet; thence North to the Southeast
corner of Lot 14; thence West 140.93 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot
12; thence South along the most Westerly line of Lot 15 to the point of
beginning, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels:
PARCEL 1:
Lot 2, Block 1, TUCKERS PROSPECT HILLS, according to the plat thereof on
file or of record in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
The Northerly 15 feet of that part of Lot 15, PROSPECT HILLS, described as
follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 15; thence East along the South
line of Lot 15 a distance of 140.93 feet; thence North to the Southeast
corner of Lot 14; thence West 140.93 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot
12; thence South along the most Westerly line of Lot 15 to the point of
.beginning, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL 2:
That part of Lot 15, PROSPECT HILLS, described as follows;
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot-15; thence East along the South
line of Lot 15 a distance of 140.93 feet; thence North to the Southeast
corner of Lot 14; thence hest 140.93 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot
12; thence South along the most Westerly line of Lot 15 to the point of
beginning, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
EXCEPT, the Northerly 15 feet thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code
Sections 810 and 850.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code
Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as
separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD: VACATION OF DRAINAGE/UTILITY AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
GRANTED FOR LOT 1. BLOCK 2 TAFT ADDITION (5020 SCRIVER ROAD) Affidavits of
Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen reminded Council that the proposed easement vacation for 5020
Scriver Road (Lot 1, Block 2, Taft Addition) was first heard by the Council on
November 1, 1993. At that time, the neighbors (Burkholders) immediately to the
east objected and the Council voted to continue the matter to allow the
petitioner to work out a plan for proposed use of the property if the easement
were vacated.
Since then, the proponent appears to have reached an agreeable compromise with
the neighbors. The agreement would request the following actions by Council:
1. Vacate utility easement as originally proposed.
2. Replace existing natural condition easement with open space easement except
for 20 feet along east property line, which would remain covered by a
natural condition easement.
Petitioner Comment
Robert Holl, 5020 Scriver Road, commented that since November 1, 1993, he had met
on two occasions with Dave and Audrey Burkholder, 5024 Scriver Road, to address
their concerns. Mr. Holl said that by letter dated December 2, 1993, Dave
Burkholder indicated that their concerns were satisfied. He said the requested
action would protect the interests of the City and the adjoining neighbors and
would allow his family more use of the backyard.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards asked if the proposed open space /natural condition easement would
run with the land. Planner Larsen said the intent is to create a permanent
change in the easement that would be recorded and would run with the land.
Member Rice told Council that he had spoken with Mr. Burkholder and had told him
that although his letter had indicated acceptance of the restrictions proposed by
Robert Holl, the decision on the easement vacation would be made by the Council.
Member Paulus asked if a precedent would be set if this easement vacation is
granted. Planner Larsen answered that what is important is that the 100 foot
conservation easement would be maintained up from the pond as required,by Code
Subsection 810.13 for any lots contiguous to a lake or pond.
Member Rice moved adoption of the following resolution, subject to the condition
that the existing natural condition easement be replaced with an open space
easement except for 20 feet along the east property line which would remain
covered by a natural condition easement:
RESOLUTION VACATING
EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND CONSERVATION PURPOSES
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 4th day of October, 1993,
fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easements for
drainage, utility and conservation purposes; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the
hearing was held on the 1st day of November, 1993, at which time all persons
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said easement vacations be made; and
WHEREAS the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning
or controlling electric, telephone or cable television, poles or lines, gas and
sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the
proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such
easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or
otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the drainage, utility
and conservation easements be and are vacated effective upon receipt of a new
open space easement, except for 20 feet along the east property line, which would
remain covered by a natural condition easement, in recordable form, duly executed
and delivered without cost to the City of Edina:
That part of Lot 1,,Block 2, TAFT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the west 5.00
feet of said Lot 1, southerly of "Line 1" described below, and northerly of
"Line 2" described below.
"Line 1":
A line which intersects the west line of said Lot 1; distant 108.00 feet
southerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 1 and intersects the east
line of Lot 2, said Block 2, distant 228.00 feet southerly of the northeast
corner of said Lot 2.
"Line 211: _
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed
bearing of South along the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 168.00
feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 86
degrees 47 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 100.00 feet and there
terminating.
The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of
proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor,
and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.851.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Resolution adopted.
(Member Smith was temporarily absent when vote was taken.)
BID AWARDED FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE/REFUSE FOR CITY PROPERTIES Mayor Richards
said he had asked that this item to be removed from the Consent Agenda to discuss
the bids for the collection of garbage /refuse for City properties. He asked if
the recommended bid by Gallagher Service, Inc. was the low bid. Sanitarian Velde
explained that since the bid opening, Hennepin County has reduced its tipping fee
but added a surcharge on the customer's bill. The Gallagher bid does include the
14.5 percent Hennepin County surcharge while the other bids do not.
Mayor Richards made a motion for award of bid for collection of garbage /refuse
for City properties to recommended bidder, Gallagher Service, Inc., at
$32,773.70.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly was temporarily absent when vote was taken.)
*BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM Motion was made by
Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for emergency
response traffic control system to recommended low bidder, Brown Traffic
Products, at $13,390.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SIX TEE OASIS - BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion was
made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for
construction of six tee oasis at Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder,
Perkins Landscape, at $13,985.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR NO. 10 WELL REPAIR Motion was made by Member Rice and was
seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for No. 10 well repair to recommended
low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company, at $8,787.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
REPORT PRESENTED ON DEER POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Assistant Manager Hughes
recalled that two months ago he was directed by the Council to prepare a report
and recommendations concerning deer population management in the City. He said a
that a detailed report with recommendations has now been provided to the Council
Members, summarized as follows:
Problem Identification
Public Health /Lyme Disease - rarely contracted within metropolitan area;
Department of Health confirms the risk as less than one per 100,000
population annually. Control of Edina's deer population as a Lyme disease
preventative not warranted.
Plant /Landscape Damage - public survey poll indicated many complaints concerning
plant and landscape damage within the City. Even with an aggressive
control program, some predation will continue. City should work with
property owners in high deer population areas regarding improvements in
fencing and repellent technology.
Traffic Safety /Personal Safety - automobile /deer collision problem seems
increasing, particularly on the Crosstown, Highway 169 and Highway 100.
Although deer are becomming very tame, there is no evidence that deer
present a personal safety risk.
Population Growth /Carrvine Capacity
Aerial surveys have been conducted yearly
1993 population - 100 plus deer.
1994 population forecast - 130 -140 deer.
Available habitat - about 2 square miles
space property as well as relatively
DNR- Recommended Density - 15 -25 deer per
Recommended Population - 40 -50 deer
since 1984 and indicate the following:
(identified as public parks and open
large tracts of land west of Hwy. 100.
square mile
Population Reduction Alternatives
Hunting - would not work in Edina.
Reintroduction of predators - would not be feasible in Edina.
Trapping and translocating - though advocated by residents, studies show high
mortality rate. Because all of Minnesota is overpopulated with deer, it
would be moving deer from Edina's problem areas to somewhere else.
Birth control - still in experimental form; nothing developed for free roaming
deer.
Allow nature to take its course - results in animal death mainly due to
automobile deer collision. Overpopulation could result in animal death due
to disease or lack of food supply.
Sharpshooting - most appropriate method, has been used successfully in
Bloomington for the past three years by using off -duty law enforcement
.officers at baited sites. Method could probably be used safely in parts of
Braemar Park.
Trap and kill - used successfully in North Oaks; would be appropriate in Edina.
Recommendations
Embark on a three year population reduction program with the following
objectives:
1. Population objective - 40 -50 deer.
2. 60 plus deer removed each winter.
3. Initial goal - 50 deer removed this winter (number of deer in
Edina has stayed static last two years and because'of late start).
4. Reduction be done by sharpshooting and trap /kill.
Additional recommendations include: (i) prohibiting deer feeding, (ii) improve
reporting of deer /vehicular accidents, (iii) participate with Hennepin Parks in
aerial surveys this winter, and (iv) improve reporting system for deer
complaints.
Assistant Manager Hughes introduced Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager with the
Department of Natural Resources, who was present to answer questions.
Member Paulus asked what kind of budget would be required to accomplish the
recommendations. Assistant Manager Hughes said the main expenditure would be for
deer population reduction. Cost for the 1991/92 program in the City of
Bloomington was $70.00 per deer removed, although real cost was closer to $100.00
per animal. In the North Oaks program of trap /kill, the cost was approximately
$130.00 per deer. No budget has been established for this program but the
estimate would be approximately $7,500.00 to come from contingencies.
Member Rice asked for more detail on the deer control methods. Jon Parker
explained that the meat can be used if the deer are trapped and shot without
drugging. Carcasses are handled under a DNR permit that requires that the meat
be turned over to the DNR Conservation Officer who donates the meat to
individuals /civic organizations and /or food shelves. Member Rice then asked if
the proposed control program was reasonable. Mr. Parker affirmed that it would
be but the City would have to come to a consensus on the deer population as a
control program is both a social and political issue.
Member Smith commented that the report was very comprehensive and asked if
interested citizens had been provided with a copy. Assistant Manager Hughes said
he felt the report should be presented to the Council initially. Member Smith
suggested that the report be made available to the public and that an ordinance
be drafted regarding feeding of deer.
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the report as presented.
Public Comment
Vic Kreuziger,-6705 Cheyenne Trail, reminded Council that he had appeared
previously before Council to speak to the serious deer problem on his property.
He said he was ecstatic with the report that has been presented: It presents the
problem as to numbers, is easy to understand and recommends a logical solution.
He urged the Council to act on the recommendations presented.
By consensus, the Council directed staff to publish notice of a public hearing on
December 20, 1993, on the deer population control program and proposed ordinance
to prohibit feeding of deer, and to also mail notices to residents that had
responded to the deer survey.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING MINNESOTA LAWS 1993 REGARDING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS (I -494 TDM ORDINANCE) Planner Larsen recalled that during
the 1993 session special legislation was passed to allow cities in the I -494
corridor to adopt ordinances relating to Traffic Demand Management measures.
Because this was special legislation, a resolution accepting the authority to
adopt TDM measures must be adopted by each city prior to considering any
ordinance. Planner Larsen pointed out that this resolution would not obligate
the City to adopt any TDM measures; it would merely accept such authority from
the state. The Joint Powers Organization (JPO) is presently reviewing a final
draft of a model TDM ordinance. The ordinance should be ready for review by the
Council in January.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved approval:
RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA LAWS 1993,
CHAPTER 230 REGARDING TRANSPORTATION
DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The Minnesota Legislature adopted Minnesota Laws
1993, Chapter 230 granting the City of Edina authority to establish by ordinance
transportation demand management programs. Minnesota Laws 1993, Chapter 230, is
a special law as defined in Article %II, Section 2 of the Constitution of the
State of Minnesota, and is not effective with respect to the City of Edina until
approved by a majority vote of all members of the City Council of the City of
Edina.
Section 2. Acceptance and Approval. Minnesota Laws 1993, Chapter 230 is
hereby approved as required by Article %II, Section 2 of the Constitution of the
State of Minnesota and Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision 2.
Section 3. Filing with Secretary of State. The Clerk is hereby, authorized
and directed to file a copy of this resolution with the Minnesota Secretary of
State together with the certificate of approval and such other information
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision 3 with respect to
the approval of Minnesota Laws 1993, Chapter 230. Such filing shall be made by
the Clerk before the first day of the neat regular session of the,Minnesota
Legislature.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
Mayor
*HEARING DATE OF APRIL 11, 1994, SET FOR BOARD OF REVIEW Motion was made by
Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly setting April 11, 1994, at 5:00 P.M.
as hearing date for the 1994 Board of Review.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION APPROVED THAT WOODDALE PARK BALLFIELD NOT BE RENAMED
Mayor Richards recalled that on September 14, 1993, the Park Board had
recommended to the Council that, because several plaques already memorialized
Philip Wesely, the Wooddale Park Ballfield not be renamed Philip Wesely Field.
He said that he has talked about this matter with family members, the Park Board
Chair and Park Director and the conclusion was that actions taken to date were
adequate.
Member Kelly made a motion to approve and accept the Park Board recommendation of
September 14, 1993, that the Wooddale Park Ballfield not be renamed. Motion was
seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*DECEMBER 29. 1993, SET FOR YEAR END MEETING Motion was made by Member Rice and
was seconded by Member Kelly setting December 29, 1993, at 5:00 P.M. for the Year
End Council Meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESIGNATIONS FROM HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION AND RECYCLING COMMISSION NOTED
Mayor Richards reported that he had received letters of resignation from John
Lonsbury (Human Relations Commission) and William Brauer (Recycling and Solid
Waste Commission). He asked the Council to submit names of interested
candidates.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated December 2, 1993, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $388,876.30;
C.D.B.G. $35.00; Communication $456.09; Working Capital $1,992.47; Art Center
$13,120.48; Golf Course $75,676.17; Ice Arena $22,144.12; Gun Range $422.55;
Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $30,508.25; Utility Fund $276,458.53; Storm Sewer
$1,987.65; Liquor Fund $100,837.04; Construction Fund $1,669.64; IBR #2 Fund
$2,175.50; TOTAL $916,359.79.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 9:03 P.M.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 8, 1993 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
Mayor Richards announced that the purpose of the meeting was consideration and
adoption of the 1994 Budget for the City of Edina and final tax levy for 1994.
PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS DISCUSSED Finance Director Wallin informed the Council
that $225,000 was budgeted in 1993 for losses due to tax abatements and for 1994
the amount proposed is $325,000. The City of Edina has recently received checks
for 1993 property tax settlements from Hennepin County which in total are
approximately $600,000 short of what was expected. An additional settlement
payment approximating $50,000 is expected in January, 1994, resulting in a
projected shortfall in tax revenues of $550,000 of which only $225,000 was
budgeted. He explained that in 1992 there was a backlog of tax court cases which
have now been settled. However, there are still many cases pending and it is
difficult to project the 1994 loss resulting from abatements. Finance Director
said he believed the $325,000 budgeted for 1994 is a conservative number and that
the City's exposure would be over that figure.
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND FEES /CHARGES FOR 1994
APPROVED Council reviewed the proposed 1994 capital improvements budget for the
Park and Recreation Department totaling $200,000 and proposed fees and charges
for 1994 as recommended by the Park Board.
Member Smith made a motion to approve and adopt the following resolutions:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PARK & RECREATION CAPITAL PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves
and adopts the 1994 Capital Improvements Program totaling $200,000.00 as
presented and on file in the offiee of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION SETTING PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following Fees and Charges for
the year 1994, as submitted by the Park Board, be approved:
PARK & RECREATION:
Playground
$10.00
Tennis Instruction $27.00
Coach Pitch
$30.00
Pee Wee Tennis $17.00
Team Tennis
$33.00
ART CENTER:
Memberships
Family
$35.00
Individual
$25.00
Class Fees (based
on number of hrs
in class)
Pon- Mem/Mem
24 hrs
$3.50 / 3.25
21 hrs
$3.75 / 3.50
20 hrs
$3.75 / 3.50
18 hrs
$3.75 / 3.50
16 hrs
$3.75 / 3.50
14 hrs
$4.00 / 3.75
12 hrs
$4.25 / 3.82
10 hrs
$4.25 / 3.85
9 hrs
$4.25 / 3.82
8 hrs
$4.50 / 4.02
6 hrs $4.50 / 4.02
(all clay and children's classes add $5)
Parent /Child Aokkshops
(includes 1 child b 1 adult)
90 min.
2 hours
3 hours
4 hours
5 hours
6 hours
7 hours
8 hours
(all pottery workshops add $5)
ARENA:
Single Hour Rate (as of Sept.)
Open Skating (Youth & Adult)
Skate Rental
Skate Sharpening
Season Tickets (Effective 10/1/94)
Resident Family:
First 2 members
Each additional member
Maximum (7 persons)
Resident Individual
Non- Resident Family:
First 2 members
Each additional member
Maximum (7 persons)
Non- Resident Individual
Classes
CUM RANGE:
Pistol 1/2 hour
25 rounds trap
Firearm Safety
Building/hr
Daily Building Rental
AOUATIC CENTER:
Daily Admission $ 5.00
Twilight Adm.(after 6 PM) $ 3.00
Resident Family: $65.00
First 2 members $45.00
Each additional member $10.00
Maximum (7 persons) $95.00
Resident Individual: $40.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE:
Patron Cards:
Individual $55.00
Executive Course $25.00
Computerized Handicaps:
Resident $14.00
Non- Resident $19.00
Golf Cars:
18 holes $20.00
9 holes $11.00
BRAEMAR GREEN FEES:
Green Fees:
18 hole /non - patron $18.00
18 hole /patron $15.00
9 hole /non- patron $10.50
Non -Memf Mem
$15 / $13
$17 / $15
$21 / $19
$27 / $25
$31 / $28
$34 / $31
$39 / $35
$42 / $38
$100.00
$ 2.50
$ 1.25
$ 2.50
$ 60.00
$ 55.00
$ 5.00
$ 80.00
$ 40.00
$ 75.00
$ 70.00
$ 5.00
$ 95.00
$ 50.00
$ 55.00
$ 5.00
$ 4.75
$ 6.00
$ 50.00
$150.00
Aquatic Instruction $ 40.00
Non - Resident Family: $ 75.00
First 2 members $ 65.00
Each additional member $ 10.00
Maximum (7 persons) $115.00
Non - Resident Individual: $ 60.00
Lockers:
Men's 72"
$35.00
Men's 42"
$25.00
Ladies' 72"
$15.00
Club Rental
$,6.00
Pull Carts
$ 2.00
Golf Range:
Large Bucket
$ 4.75
Small Bucket
$ 3.00
Warm -up Bucket
$ 1.50
Group Car Fees $28.00
Group Golf Lessons:
9 hole /patron
$ 9.00
Adult
$55.00
Group Fees - 18-holes
$24.00
Junior
$28.00
Group Fees - 9 hole
$14.00
BRAEMtAR EXECUTIVE COURSE GREEN FEES:
Adult /non- patron
$ 7.00
Golf Cars
$ 9.00
Adult /patron
$ 6.00
Pull Carts
$ 1.75
Junior patron
$ 5.00
Group Fees
$ 9.00
BRAEMfAR CLUBHOUSE:
Braemar Room
Night Rate /resi.
$600.00
Non -resi.
$650.00
Other events
$250 - $650
Concession Fees
Variable prices
(Concession is an annual increase of
5 %, as a general rule)
NORMANDALE EXECUTIVE COURSE:
Adult /non - patron
$ 8.00
Golf Cars
$ 9.00
Adult /patron
$ 7.00
Pull Carts
$ 1.75
Junior /non- patron
$ 6.00
Group Fees
$ 9.00
Junior /patron
$ 5.00
GOLF DOME:
Large Bucket
$ 5.00
Soccer rental/hour
$ 95.00
Sr. Bucket
$ 4.75
League
$535.00
Time Golf 1/2 hour
$ 7.50
EDINBOROUGH•
Daily Passes
$ 3.00
Season Passes:
Edina Family
First 2 members
$195.00
Each additional member
$ 15.00
Maximum (7 persons)
$270.00
Edina Individual
$180.00
Non -Edina Family
First 2 members
$215.00
Each additional member
$ 20.00
Maximum (7 persons)
$315.00
Non -Edina Individual
$195.00
Towel Fee
$ .75
Skate Rental Fee
$ 1.50
Domestic Photography by Professionals
(per hour)
Any park area requiring
barricades
$ 50.00
Grotto
$ 50.00
Theater
$ 75.00
Great Hall
$ 75.00
Ice Rink
$ 100.00
Commercial Photography by
Professional
(per hour)
Any park area requiring
barricades
$ 200.00
Grotto
$ 200.00
Theater
$ 200.00
Great Hall
$ 300.00
Ice Rink
$ 300.00
Nixed Use
$1,000.00
Commercial Use, i.e.(Trade
Shows)
$2,500.00
Building Rentals
Category 1: City of Edina & Boards /Associations
$175 /day +$12 /man -
set -up /down
Category 2: Edina Civic
Organizations
b Edina Schools (N -Th)
Great Hall
$ 150.00
Theatre
$ 75.00
Grotto
$ 50.00
Category 3: Edina Residents & Businesses
(per hour)
Great Hall $ 300.00
Grotto $ 75.00
Theatre $ 125.00
Category 4: Non -Edina Residents & Business (per hour)
Great Hall $ 350.00
Grotto $ 125.00
Theatre $ 150.00
Category 5: Exclusive Rentals
Friday Nights $1,300.00
Saturday Nights $1,500.00
Rental Amenities:
Banners $
Cover over ice rink $
CENTENNIAL IAKES•
Rentals:
Radio Control Boats $3.00/half hr
Winter Sled $3.00/hour
Centrum Building Rental:
Monday thru Thursday & *Sunday (day)
Half Day Rental - Half Room
Half Day - Full Room
Full Day Rental - Half Room
Full Day Rental - Full Room
Friday - Day Rental Only
Half Day Rental - Half Room
Half Day Rental - Full Room
Weekend Banquet Rental Fees (6:00
Friday Evening
Saturday Evening
Sunday Evening
75.00
125.00
Paddle Boat
Ice Skate
$ 125.00
$ 200.00
$ 250.00
$ 400.00
$ 150.00
$ 300.00
P.M. - 1:00 A.M.)
*Sunday afternoon rental not available
PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS:
$3.00/half hr
$1.50 /per pair
$ 600.00
$ 600.00
$ 600.00
if there is a Sunday evening rental
General Park Areas: $ 50/hr - commercial use (i.e. TV Commercials)
Picnic Shelters:
Showmobile:
Athletic Field Rental:
Associations
Residents/Non- Residents:
Arneson Acres Terrace Room
Tupa Park, Cahill School,
Grange Hall
VanValkenburg and
Courtney Fields,
Edina Athletic Assn.
Edina Organizations
Motion for adoption of
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,
Resolutions adopted.
the
$100/hr with lights
$ 70 /group at Lake Cornelia Park
$700 /day
(Baseball, Softball, Football, Soccer)
$100 /field /day (includes overhead)
Per Day - $100 /per field /per day plus expenses
Per Hour - $ 35 /per field /per hour
$ 55 /per field /per hour with lights
$125 /day ($50 1st hour minimum, $25/hr after)
$125 /day ($50 1st hour minimum, $25/hr after)
$100 /day includes labor and materials
(no charge for building rental)
$100 /day plus labor and materials plus
$100 /day for building rental
resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rice, Smith, Richards
1994 PROPOSED GENERAL FEES AND CHARGES APPROVED The Council reviewed the
proposed general 1994 Fees and Charges as recommended by the Finance Department.
Finance Director Wallin explained that an increase of 4.8% is proposed for sewer
a
service and an increase of 6.0% is proposed for water service. The Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission has proposed an increase of 4.2% for sewer maintenance.
Member Paulus made a motion to approve the Schedule of Proposed 1994 Fees and
Charges as presented and on file in the office of the Finance Director. Motion
was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1994: AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR
1994 Member Paulus also moved adoption of the following resolutions:
RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the
following ambulance service fees for 1994:
AMBULANCE FEES
Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or
transportation to a medical facility:
Level
I - On Scene Treatment
$
155.00
following miscellaneous fees for 1994:
Specialized medical services performed at scene
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS /SPILLS RESPONSE
Engine/Fire Company
$165.00 per hour /2 hour minimum
with no transport involved
$330.00 per hour
Specialized Personnel
Level
II - Minor Care (BLS)
$
345.00
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Vital Signs
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Other City Resources
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Splinting
was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall: -
-
Bandaging, etc.
Resolutions adopted.
Level
III - Moderate Care (ALS)
$
420.00
I.V. Setups
ERG Monitoring
Spine Immobilization
Level
IV - Major Care
$
485.00
Level III plus any: Medications
MAST (inflated)
Additional Manpower
Mechanical Extrication
Level V - Cardiac Arrest $ 590.00
Level IV plus any: Cardio Pulmonary
Resuscitation (CPR)
Defibrillation
Oxygen Administration $ 24.00
Mileage From Scene to Hospital
$ 6.00 /mile
RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the
following miscellaneous fees for 1994:
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS /SPILLS RESPONSE
Engine/Fire Company
$165.00 per hour /2 hour minimum
HazMat Unit
$330.00 per hour
Specialized Personnel
$ 55.00 per hour /2 hour minimum
Specialized Equipment
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Supplies
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Disposal
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Other City Resources
Cost + 15% administrative charge
Motion for adoption of the resolutions
was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall: -
-
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolutions adopted.
1994 CITY OF EDINA BUDGET ADOPTED The Council Members then focused their
discussion on the proposed 1994 City Budget totaling $15,182,301 and reflecting
an increase of 4.91% in expenditures. Items discussed and debated to be cut from
the proposed budget amounts included contingencies, reserve rebuild, special
assessments, memberships in governmental lobbying organizations (LMC, AMM, MLQ ,
and departmental budgets for Public Works, Public Safety, Parks and Recreation,
Planning /Health and Central Services. There was consensus among the Council to
support the 2% wage increase and the $40 /month additional employee benefits.
Following considerable debate, the Council Members compromised on a total cut of
$120,000 from the proposed 1994 Budget, and in specific the following:
Contingencies $ 77,000
Equipment 15,000
Special 'Assessments 12,000
Reserve Rebuild 16.000
$120,000
resulting in a 1994 Budget totaling $15,062,301, reflecting an increase in
expenditures of 4.08% and a tax increase of 4.42 %.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1994, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1994 PAYABLE IN 1994
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1994 is hereby
adopted as hereinafter set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefor.
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council
$ 62,326
Administration
630,826
Planning
238,178
Finance
375,715
Election
75,303
Assessing
399,825
Legal and Court Services
351,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$ 2,133,173
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration
$ 128,748
Engineering
467,817
Highways
2,964,980
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$ 3,561,545
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
Police
$4,028,487
Civilian Defense
30,180
Animal Control
60,029
Fire
2,372,748
Public Health
347,101
Inspection
293,111
TOTAL PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND
PROPERTY
$ 7,131,656
PARK DEPARTMENT
Administration
$ 431,306
Recreation
115,800
Maintenance
1,307,921
TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT
$ 1,855,027
NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
Reserve Rebuild $ 84,000
Contingencies 60,000
Special Assessments on City Property 33,000
Capital Plan Appropriation 117,000
Commissions and Special Projects 86.900
TOTAL NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES $ 380.900
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 15.062.301
Section 2. Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby proposed as
hereinafter set forth:
GENERAL FUND
HACA
$ 994,020
Other Taxes
(305,000)
Licenses and Permits
861,130
Municipal Court Fines
470,000
Department Service Charges
1,060,500
Other
181,500
Transfer from Liquor Fund
380,000
Income on Investments
45,000
Aid - Other Agencies
263,100
Police Aid
230.000
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS
$ 4.134.750
Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and
personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the
amounts hereinafter set forth:
FOR GENERAL FUND
$10.927.551
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 8:12 P.M.
City Clerk
(j r
A.
o e A
t04 Cn
• ��bRlOM sV
leer
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Counci
Agenda Item ##
III. A.
From:
Francis Hoffman
Consent
LJ
City Engineer / 1
Information Only
Date:
20 December, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
T
To Council
Street Vacation
�—.
Arthur Street
Action
;!
Motion
'x
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Vacate portion of Arthur Street as petitioned.
Info /Background:
The property owner at 413 Arthur Street requests the vacation of
the street portion of an old cul -de -sac resulting after the
extension of Arthur Street. The attached diagram depicts the
requested area of street vacation. The staff and utility compa-
nies have reviewed this and find no reservation to the request.
As such, the recommendation is to vacate this street easement
with reservation.
)! 6528
i
i
4 I
4
8
12 I
I
M
- - - -- I I -- 6512 L— � L 6424
J1 -J -- w!l
ly
r 6511 6509 6501 ,
401 6525 6521 6517 400 I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
1405 _� —�
I � � —�— 404 1
- --�
404 405 I - - -- I
I � I �� . ��� - - --
1 409 I — -
- — I 408 409 408 I
I
I
uj 141i I — - --
I
w
>1 413 1 412
415 412
419 417 416
I I —
cn
1 I I I= 1 I I ✓1 I Fl
~' I I I
421 6528 I 6512 I Q 421 6420 I
� � -- �-�- -- i -- -50-1
. . . ..............
� C
y O
CL C
a >Q
0
i
= ,
Lo .
i
I
L
MI
4,;-i� N�.r'l�
e vt
ch
l.ee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: DECEMBER 16, 1993
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
TO NAME ROADWAY FROM
BRAEMAR BOULEVARD TO
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE "JOHN
HARRIS DRIVE"
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IV . A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12 to name roadway from Braemar Boulevard to
Braemar Clubhouse "JOHN HARRIS DRIVE ".
Info /Background:
As directed by Council, Ordinance No. 1993 -12 has been drafted which would
name the roadway from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar Clubhouse "JOHN HARRIS
DRIVE."
Notice of the proposed ordinance was published in the Edina Sun - Current on
December 8, 1993, and was posted on December 3, 1993. A copy of the notice
was mailed to the Normandale Post Office at 5108 W. 74th Street, the Edina
Post Office at 3948 1/2 Street and the Main Post Office, Minneapolis. In
contacting the Postmaster at the Normandale Branch -(who handles the mail
for the Braemar Clubhouse) there is no objection to using the address of
6364 John Harris Drive, Edina MN 55439 for the Braemar Clubhouse.
Two written objections have been received to date and are attached. If adopted
by Council as drafted, staff would recommend waiving Second Reading so that
the ordinance can be published prior to January 1, 1994 when the ordinance
would be in effect.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
STREET NAME ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The roadway from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar Golf Course
Clubhouse is hereby named "John Harris Drive ".
Section. 2 Following publication, the effective date of this Ordinance shall be
January 1, 1994.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
will meet on Monday, December 20, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 4801 West
50th Street to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12. If adopted,
this Ordinance would name the roadway from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar
Golf Course Clubhouse "John Harris Drive" and the address for the Braemar Golf
Course Clubhouse would then become 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, MN 55439.
It is proposed that this ordinance would be effective as of January 1, 1994.
No other properties would be affected by this ordinance.
All comments and recommendations will be heard by the Council at the public
hearing. Written comments may be submitted on or prior to December 20, 1994.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
gqc,- l y R 3— r -i-
✓(ill �' � ✓U r` �/ ^.�U% '�Yt/��j � /� i
G'
(�. �
. ��..�
��-
l � �
� �
���
/i%% i
� � � � -� ,�
�.�
-�
,�� � ^
��
FROM ABRAMS AND SPECTOR 12.15.1993 12:07 P. 1
RICHARD a. ABRAMS
SUITE 600 . 6800 FRANCE AvFNUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435
December 15, 1993
Mayor Fred Richards Via Fax: 927 -7645
c/o City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 53424 -1394
Re: Door Ordinance and Braemar Boulevard .name change
My wife and I would be in favor of eliminating LU the
deer in Edina. They eat our flowers, ruin our trees,
and in general constitute a nuisance. Reducing the
herd is appropriate but elimination of the herd would
be better as far as we are concerned.
The Braemar golf facility is used by large numbers of
citizens from outside as well as inside our city. To
change the name of the road leading to the Clubhouse
to John Harris Drive would in my opinion be confusing
to those who are not familiar with the location of the
Clubhouse. Certainly Mr. Harris' golfing ability is
to be commanded but I would think the City could find
other ways to honor him.
Sinoaiely yours,
,17
Richard B. Abrams
DATE: 12/2/93
TO: Meridel Hedblom
Edina Sun - Current
FROM: Marcella Daehn
RE: Official Publication
ITEM(S): NO. DESCRIPTION
1 Notice of Hearing - Adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12
PURPOSE:
As you requested
For your information
For your approval
REMARKS: 2 pages including cover
Review and return
Reply to sender
Other (see remarks)
(OFFICIAL PUBLICATION)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
will meet on Monday, December 20, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 4801 West
50th Street to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12. If adopted,
this Ordinance would name the roadway from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar
Golf Course Clubhouse "John Harris Drive" and the address for the Braemar Golf
Course Clubhouse would then become 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, MN 55439.
It is proposed that this ordinance would be effective as of January 1, 1994.
No other properties would be affected by this ordinance.
All comments and recommendations will be heard by the Council at the public
hearing. Written comments may be submitted on or prior to December 20, 1994.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Publish in the Edina Sun - Current on December 8, 1993
Send two Affidavits of Publication
Bill to City of Edina
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING NOTICE
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Police Officer for the City of
Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have on
this date posted copies of the attached notice of:
PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12 (NAPIING ROADWAY TO BRAE14AR
CLUBHOUSE)
at each of the official City bulletin boards, located at conspicuous places
within the City as follows:
1) City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
2) Municipal Liquor Store, 50th and France Business Area
3) Centennial Lakes Park Centrum, 7499 France Avenue South
Dated �Z _'t;S' 95 Signed l 4 t+;
Signed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public
in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, this
rd day of 19�?
✓-'ila�zc;(. "lam
8/91
e
0
City of Edina
CITY OF EDINA
4801 VEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
will meet on Mondav, December 20, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 4801 West
50th Street to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12. If adopted,
this Ordinance would name the roadwav from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar
Golf Course Clubhouse "John Harris Drive" and the address for the Braemar Golf
Course Clubhouse would then become 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, MN 55439.
It is proposed that this ordinance would be effective as of January 1, 1994.
No other properties would be affected by this ordinance.
All comments and recommendations will be heard by the Council at the public
hearing. Written comments may be submitted on or prior to December 20, 1994.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927-7643
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55324 -1394 TDD (612) 927.5461
1/1/.74
STATE OF MINNESOTA ).
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk
of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following
date December 6 , 1993 acting on behalf of said
City I deposited in the United States mail co ies of the attached
Notice of Public hearing on Ordinance No. 1993 -12
(Exhibit A) , enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly
prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing
list (Exhibit B) attached to the original hereof, which list is on file
in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the
County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective
names, as of a date at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing;
and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the
indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore
not carried on the records of said County Auditor.
Name Address
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of
December , 19 93
Edina City Clerk
0
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, KINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12
City of Edina
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
will meet on Monday, December 20, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 4801 West
50th Street to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -12. If adopted,
this Ordinance would name the roadway from Braemar Boulevard to the Braemar
Golf Course Clubhouse "John Harris Drive" and the address for the Braemar Golf
Course Clubhouse would then become 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, MN 55439.
It is proposed that this ordinance would be effective as of January 1, 1994.
No other properties would be affected by this ordinance.
All comments and recommendations will be heard by the Council at the public
hearing. Written comments may be submitted on or prior to December 20, 1994.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 NEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
MAILING LIST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -12 (NAMING ROADWAY TO
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE "JOHN HARRIS DRIVE ":
Postmaster
Normandale Post Office
5108 W. 74th Street
Edina MN 55439
Postmaster
Main Post Office
1st Street & Marquette Av
Minneapolis MN 55401
Postmaster -
Edina Post Office
3948 W. 49 1/2 Street
Edina MN 55424
Braemar Clubhouse
Braemar Golf Course
6364 Dewey Hill Rd
Edina MN 55439
.z
e`
ch
0
H�J .�y
• �N�aPOeMS�V •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date. DECEMBER 16, 1993
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -13
AMENDING CODE SECTION 185
SCHEDULE A TO INCREASE
CERTAIN FEES AND TO ADD
CERTAIN FEES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
IV. B
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
7
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1993 -13 with waiver of Second Reading to allow for
publication prior to 01/01/94.
Info /Background:
At the December 8, 1993 Special Meeting for Adoption of the 1994 Budget, the
Council approved the fees and charges for 1994, as presented.
Since that meeting the City has been informed by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission that the SAC charge will be raised from $750 (1993 rate) to $800 for
1994. John Wallin recommends that the City raise its fee for SAC charges to
$800 for 1994 also in order to pass through this additional cost. The proposed
ordinance reflects the $800 fee.for 1994.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -13
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CODE SECTION 185 SCHEDULE A
TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES AND TO ADD CERTAIN FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are
amended to read as follows:
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
410 410.02, Building permit:
Subd. 1 Total valuation of work:
$1.00 to $500.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
*$20.00
*$20.00 for first $500.00 plus
$2.50 for each additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof to
and including $2,000.00
*$57.50 for first $2,000.00
plus $9.50 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
to and including $25,000.00
*$276.00 for first $25,000.00
plus $7.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
to and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 *$451.00 for first $50,000.00
plus $5.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
to and including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 *$701.00 for the first
$100,000.00 plus $4.00 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof to and including
$500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 *$2301.00 for the first
$500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof to and including
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up *$3801.00 for the first
$1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof
*plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 168.70
-1-
30
31
Wj
33
34
35
M
37
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
435 435.07
435 435.07
Gas piping permit
Minimum Fee:
Residential - *$21.00
Commercial - *$26.00
FEE NO.
60
61
Fee Calculations:
$ 0- $1,000 *$15.00 plus 3.00% > $ 500.00
$ 1,001 - $5,000 *$30.00 plus 2.50% > $ 1,000.00
$ 5,001 - $10,000 *$130.00 plus 2.10% > $ 5,000.00
$10,001 - $25,000 *$235.00 plus 1.80% > $10,000.00
$25,001- $50,000 *$505.00 plus 1.60% > $25,000.00
$50,001 & over *$905.00 plus 1.25% > $50,000.00
*plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70
Oil burner, stoker,
steam or hot water
heating, mechanical
warm air heating and
air conditioning or
refrigeration permit
62
63
64
65
66
67
Minimum Fee: 68
Single Family - *$21.00 69
Commercial - *$26.00
*plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70
All fees for above permits based on contract price as
follows:
$ 0- 1,000.00
*$ 15.00 +
3.00% of anything over
$ 500.00
1,001.00- 5,000.00
*$ 30.00 +
2.508 of anything over
1,000.00
5,001.00- 10,000.00
*$130.00 +
2.108 of anything over
5,000.00
10,001.00- 25,000.00
*$235.00 +
1.808 of anything over
10,000.00
25,001.00 - 50,000.00
*$505.00 +
1.608 of anything over
25,000.00
50,001.00 and over
*$905.00 +
1.258 of anything over
50,000.00
*plus surcharge
pursuant to M.S.
16B.70
440 440.04 Plumbing or water
Fees same as
for gas piping permit
conditioning permit
450 450.05 Swimming pool
Same as amount
of the fee for a building
construction
permit
450 450.27, Public or semi-
$295.00 per
annum for each pool enclosed
Subd. 4 public swimming
part or all
of the year
license
$155.00 per
annum for each outdoor
pool
450 450.27, Public or semi-
$75.00 per
annum for each bath or
pool
Subd. 4 public whirlpool
bath or therapeutic
swimming pool
license
-2-
70
71
72
73
74
75
75a
80
81
82
83
Y
SEC. SUBSEC, PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT
605 605.07 Permits required
by UFC
Special hazard
permit:
Minimum fee: $35.00
Class I: General hazard and fire $35.00
safety inspections requiring a
special hazard permit
Class III: Special hazard $125.00
inspection primarily directed at,
but not limited to, buildings or
occupancies 3000 sq ft or larger
where any of the following are
present:
A. Multiple hazards
B. Storage handling, and /or processes
involving dangerous or toxic
materials, substances and /or
processes
C. Occupancies in which evaluation
or high valuation presents
unique circumstances
625 625.04 Sprinkler permit fees:
Number of heads
1 - 5 *$ 40.00 (minimum fee)
6 - 10 *$ 65.00
11 - 20 *$ 90.00
21 - 30 *$110.00
31 - 40 *$130.00
41 - 50 *$150.00
51 - 60 *$165.00
61 - 70 *$180.00
71 - 80 *$195.00
81 - 90 *$210.00
91 - 100 *$220.00
101 - 110 *$230.00
111 - 120 *$240.00
121 - 130 *$249.00
131 - 140 *$258.00
141 - 150 *$267.00
151 - 160 *$275.00
161 - 170 *$283.00
171 - 180 *$291.00
181 - 190 *$298.00
191 - 200 *$305.00
201 plus *$305.00 for first 200 plus $6.00 for
each additional head
*plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 168.70
-3-
FEE NO.
95
96
98
110
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
625 625.03 Fire pump installation
and associated hardware
Standpipe installation
Each additional
standpipe
625 625.03 Fire alarm system
permit
635 635.02 False fire alarm
720 720.04 , Food establishment
Subd. 3 license
Day care, limited
food establishment
license
Take -out food facility
license
Packaged food sales
license
Food warehouse license
Catering food
establishment license
Itinerant food
establishment license
Retail candy shop
license
Potentially hazardous
food vehicle license
Fleet of 5 or more
potentially hazardous
food vehicles license
Catering food vehicle
license
Food vehicle license
Fleet of 5 or more
food vehicles license
AMOUNT FEE N0.
$80.00 118
$80.00 119
$ 8.00 120
Same as the amount of fee for a 121
building permit
$225.00 for the third and each 125
subsequent response within one
calendar year
$410.00 per annum, $360.00 if 135
certified pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code,
plus $110.00 per annum for each
additional facility
$125.00 per annum 136
$275.00 per annum, $225.00 if
137
certified pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code
$130.00 per annum
138
$70.00 per annum
139
$410.00 per annum, $360.00 if
140
certified pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code,
plus $110.00 per annum for each
additional facility
$70.00 per event
141
$50.00 per annum, plus $5.00 per annum
142
for each additional facility
$80.00 per annum
143
$400.00 per annum 144
$150.00 per annum, plus $25.00 per 145
annum for each additional vehicle
$ 80.00 per annum 146
$400.00 per annum 147
-4-
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
735 735.03 Hotel, lodging or Hotels - $200.00 for 1 -50 rooms and 155
boarding house license $1.00 per each room over 50
Lodging and boarding houses - $60.00 156
per location
815 815.03
Permit fee for
Same as amount of the fee for a 165
212
antennas, dish antennas
building permit
213
and towers
$210.00
830 830.05,
Permit fee for tree
Same as amount of the fee for a 175
Subd. 1
removal or grading
building permit
830 830.05,
Permit fee for open
Same as amount of the fee for a 176
Subd. 1
pit or excavation of
building permit
1
100 cubic feet or more
209
900 900.06, Non - intoxicating malt
Subd. 1
liquor license:
fewer seats - $690.00
212
51 - 100 seats, inclusive - $750.00
213
On -sale
$210.00
per
annum (renewal)
207
- $865.00
215
$270.00
per
annum (new)
208
900 900.04,
Off -sale
$210.00
per
annum (renewal)
209
Subd. 2
$270.00
per
annum (new)
900 900.16,
Temporary on -sale
$40.00
211
Subd. 3
non - intoxicating malt
buildings containing
liquor license
units:
900 900.16, On -sale wine license (per year):
Subd. 1
Restaurants with 50 or
fewer seats - $690.00
212
51 - 100 seats, inclusive - $750.00
213
101 - 150 seats, inclusive - $810.00
214
Over 150 seats
- $865.00
215
900 900.17,
Manager's license
$60.00 per year
216
Subd. 6A
1100 1100.03,
Sewer service charge:
Subd. 2
Single family dwellings,
Based upon water usage during winter
town houses, two - family
quarter (Three month period falling
dwellings, apartment
between November 1 and March 1)
buildings containing
four or less dwelling
units:
To and including 1600
$24.32 quarter
235
cubic feet
From 1601 cubic feet
$1.52 per 100 cubic feet
236
and over
Apartment buildings with
$117.00 plus $21.75 for each unit over
237
more than four dwelling
four, or $1.52 per 100 cubic feet of
units
water during the quarter, whichever
is greater
-5-
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
1100 1100.03, Sewer service charge:
Subd. 2 Commercial and
industrial buildings,
including shools
and churches
1100 1100.03, Water service:
Subd. 2
1105 1105.01, Service Availability
Subd. 1 Charge (SAC)
1300 1300.02, Refuse or recycling
Subd. 1 hauler license
AMOUNT FEE NO.
$30.00 per water meter or approved 238
sewage metering device on premises, or
$1.52 per 100 cubic feet of water used
during the quarter, whichever is
greater
1. $0.53 per 100 cubic feet for all
areas of City, except areas
described below in 2.
Minimum charge of $8.48 per quarter
will be made where water consumption
amounts to less than 1600 cubic feet
2. $1.30 per 100 cubic feet for
Morningside area and for east side
of Beard Av. from West 54th St. to
Fuller St. and both sides of
Abbott P1. from West 54th St. to
Beard Av.
Minimum charge of $15.60 per quarter
will be made where water consumption
amounts to less than 1600 cubic feet
for areas described in 2. above.
242
243
244
245
$800.00 per SAC unit x number of SAC 250
units computed pursuant to Subsection
1105.01, Subd. 1 of this Code
$120.00 per annum for first vehicle, 270
$50.00 for each additional vehicle
Section 2. Schedule A to Section 185 is hereby amended by adding the
following fees thereto:
SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
420 420.02 Monitoring well permit $50.00 per well 50a
720 720.04, Pushcart license $120.00 per annum 147a
1345 1345.05, License for sexually- $200.00 per annum 289
Subd. 1 oriented businesses
1345 1345.05, Investigation fee at $1,500.00 289a
Subd. 2 time of original
application for license
-v
Section 3. Following publication, the effective date of this Ordinance shall
be January 1, 1994.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-7-
Mayor
/91N�11\
o e 'y
O
J• ���DRR1M•ti�
inatl
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item # Iv. c . & vI I . A .
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent,
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: DECEMBER 20, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN
❑
Resolution
®
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt the recommendations of the proposed deer population management plan. Grant
First Reading to Ordinance No. 1993 -14, An Ordinance Prohibiting the Intentional Feeding
of Deer.
Info /Background:
On December 20, 1993, the City Council will again consider the proposed Deer Population
Management Plan. In accordance with your direction, mailed notice has been sent to all
individuals who provided their name and address on their response to last summers' deer
survey. Notice has also been published in the Edina Sun - Current. Also, in accordance with
your request, Ordinance No. 1993 -14 has been prepared for your consideration. This
Ordinance would prohibit the intentional feeding of deer within the City limits.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -14
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PROHIBIT THE INTENTIONAL FEEDING OF DEER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended to provide a new subsection 1000.12
as follows:
"1000.12. Intentional Feeding of Deer.
Subd. 1. Feeding Prohibited. No person shall feed deer within the City. For
purposes of this subdivision, feeding shall mean the provision of one half cubic foot
or more of grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay or other edible material either on the
ground or at a height of less than five feet above the ground, in a manner that
attracts deer. Living food sources such as trees and other live vegetation shall not
be considered as deer feeding.
Subd. 2. Exception. The provisions of Subd. 1 of this subsection shall not apply to
the employees or agents of the City, the County, the State, the Federal government
or veterinarians who in the course of their official duties have deer in their custody
or under their management."
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
PROPOSED DEER POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
BACKGROUND
The City Council has discussed the concept of deer population control on several
occasions during the past five years. In 1988, representatives of the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources and Hennepin Parks discussed deer population dynamics and
movements with the City Council. These representatives noted that Edina's deer population
is part of a larger herd which occupies Bloomington and Eden Prairie. They noted that
population reduction efforts in Edina alone would probably be unsuccessful due to deer
immigration for the other cities.
In the winter of 1991 -1992, the City of Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, the DNR, and
the Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a deer control program within Bloomington. In 1991-
1992, 335 deer were killed by sharpshooters and sport hunters. In the winter of 1992 -1993,
369 deer were killed. For this coming winter, a goal of 370 deer kills has been established.
In future years, lower numbers of deer kills will be required in order to maintain a deer
population density of approximately 22 deer per square mile of habitat.
The City of Eden Prairie has established a committee for the purpose of
recommending population control alternatives to the City Council. At present, the
Committee has not completed its work. Due to Bloomington's program and Eden Prairie's
possible program, a control program in Edina may now be more feasible.
On September 20, 1993, the Edina City Council received the results of a survey
concerning Edina's deer population that was included in the Spring issue of About Town.
On October 4, 1993, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report and
recommendation concerning deer population management in Edina.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
White- tailed deer are the most abundant and best -known large herbivore in the
United States. Deer are extremely adaptable for co- existence with the human population
and enjoy a high -rate of reproductive success even within major metropolitan areas.
Edina's deer herd has increased significantly during the past 10 years. Winter aerial
surveys flown by Hennepin Parks show the deer population in the Braemar Park area
increased from six animals in 1984 to 52 animals in 1993. Hennepin Parks reported similar
increases in neighboring cities.
Increases in Edina's deer population coupled with the development of remaining
lands have led to more and more contacts between deer and residents. Many of these
encounters are welcomed by residents. However, as the deer and human populations have
1
grown, more and more of the encounters have become unwelcome. The following concerns
have been expressed by residents:
o Public Health Issues - Especially Lyme Disease
o ,Plant/Landscaping Damage
o Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
A. Public Health/Lyme Disease
Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria which can be carried by deer ticks. The
disease is not usually fatal but can cause a variety of symptoms including
fever, chills, headache, dizziness, muscle aches, joint pain and chronic fatigue.
The disease also affects the cardiac and nervous system and can lead to
arthritic conditions and /or heart arrhythmia. Early diagnosis of the disease
aids in successful treatment using antibiotics.
The deer tick is carried by a variety of warm blooded animals. Not only white -
tailed deer but also mice, birds, woodchucks, dogs, cattle, and other animals
are hosts for the deer tick. It is now believed that the adult deer tick will
feed on a larger host such as a dog or deer before dropping off and laying
eggs on the ground. The nymph stage is believed to feed on smaller animals
such as rodents and birds. The nymph stage of the tick is very small, about
the size of a pin head and is extremely difficult to detect. Birds may play a
major role in dissemination of the deer tick.
The mere presence of deer ticks in the environment does not mean the risk
for Lyme disease is present. The tick must harbor the bacteria which cause
Lyme disease and not all ticks have the bacteria. Some areas of the country
have a very low incidence of the bacteria in the ticks (less than 10 %) and
other areas have as high as 90% of the ticks positive for the bacteria.
The Minnesota Department of Health has conducted investigations of Lyme
disease since 1982. During 1991 and 1992, 161 cases of Lyme disease were
reported in the Twin Cities area. Only 22% of these cases had likely exposure
within the metro area and most of these exposures occurred in Anoka and
Washington counties which adjoin those portions of Minnesota and Wisconsin
with the major concentration of Lyme disease harboring ticks. The results of
the Department of Health surveillance confirm that the risk for acquiring
Lyme disease in most of the metro area is less than one per 100,000
population annually. The risk is particularly low in the southern and western
suburbs. Although Lyme disease must be continually studied, based upon the
above data, the control of Edina's deer population as a Lyme disease
preventative is not warranted.
2
Some residents have expressed concern regarding excessive feces produced by
deer. Although this may present an occasional nuisance, no significant public
health risks are associated with deer feces.
B. Plant and Landscape Damage
Deer predation of landscaping, especially ornamentals, is the most commonly
received complaint with respect to deer. Although deer are not the only
wildlife species contributing to such damage, they probably are responsible for
most large scale predation. City staff provides written materials as well as a
video to interested residents who wish to discourage predation. Preventative
techniques such as fencing and repellents have been shown to be effective in
reducing damage. However, these techniques, especially the use of repellents,
require a serious commitment by affected residents. Normal residential
fencing is not effective as a deterrent unless it is very tall. Other fence
designs or electric fencing may be effective but might not be compatible with
uses of adjacent properties.
Some repellents are effective in reducing predation. However, constant
vigilance is necessary to maintain effectiveness. Repellents must be reapplied
periodically based upon weather conditions and the growth rate of vegetation.
Given the cost, repellents are most effective for relatively small landscaped
areas.
If the City's deer population is reduced, will predation of landscaping be
eliminated? Probably not, although the frequency and magnitude of predation
should be reduced. Even if the City were to attempt to eliminate all deer
from Edina, it is virtually impossible to effect this level of control. Therefore,
even with an aggressive population control program, some predation will
continue. Residents living in high deer population areas are best advised to
design or modify landscape areas to reduce the potential for predation. For
its part, the City should make known to residents any advancements or
improvements in fencing and repellent technology.
C. Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
Automobile /deer collisions are an on -going concern and the risk of such
collisions increases as deer populations and traffic volumes increase. The area
of greatest concern is Highway 169 and the Crosstown Highway west of
Highway 100 where the ,speed and volume of traffic contributes to more
serious, deer collisions, or collisions with other vehicles while drivers attempt
to avoid deer. Although collisions also occur on City streets, the speed of
vehicles in such settings reduces the chance of serious injury. Significant
vehicle damage, however, can occur at even reduced speeds.
Some residents have reported that deer have become extremely tame and no
longer flee at the sight of people. Some residents are concerned that such
3
deer may become hostile and present a risk to personal safety. Although deer
may occasionally startle a homeowner, reports of attacks by wild deer are
almost non - existent. (Attacks by captive deer seem more common.)
POPULATION GROWTH AND CARRYING CAPACITY
Deer are very successful reproducers. A mature doe typically produces twins annually
and may produce triplets. The University of Minnesota reports an average of 1.33 fetuses
per mature doe in a study of North Oaks, Minnesota. In the absence of natural predators
and sport hunting, and with proper habitat, an area's deer population can increase rapidly.
Hyland Park Reserve's population was estimated to have doubled in seven years immediately
preceding commencement of a control program. The North Oaks population increased from
240 deer in 1976 to about 800 deer in 1993 even though population control programs were
implemented in seven of those years.
Deer populations eventually reach an upper limit based on the quality and amount
of food sources as well as the availability of winter habitat. The upper limit at which deer
remain in good physical condition is referred to as the Biological Carrying Capacity. As the
Carrying Capacity is exceeded, the physical condition of the population and its habitat
deteriorate.
Although biological carrying capacity provides a proper measure of deer population
and habitat health, it may not be an appropriate measure of deer populations in urban
areas. As such, some have suggested the term "Cultural Carrying Capacity" as a better
standard for urban areas. Cultural Carrying Capacity, or the maximum number of deer that
can co -exist compatibly with local human populations, is a function of the sensitivity of
people to the presence of deer. Cultural Carrying Capacity is understandably much more
difficult to measure than Biological Carrying Capacity in that different individuals have
different sensitivities to the deer population.
RECOMMENDED POPULATION OBJECTIVES
The Minnesota DNR recommended to the Minnesota River Valley Deer
Management Task Force a deer population density goal of 15 - 25 animals per square mile
of habitat. The Cities of Bloomington and North Oaks have established population goals
of 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat. Based upon the experience of the DNR and
other cities practicing deer management programs, staff believes that a goal of 15 - 25 per
square mile of habitat is reasonable for Edina.
For purposes of establishing population objectives, we have attempted to identify deer
habitat within Edina. Habitat comprises adequate food, water, protective cover, and living
space in a suitable arrangement to promote a healthy population. For population purposes,
we believe that only those lands set aside as parks or open space, or large tracts of
undeveloped private land should constitute deer habitat. Although deer roam widely and
4
utilize many areas such as residential lots, we believe that such areas do not provide all of
the necessary components of deer habitat and, therefore, should not be relied upon for
population purposes. Similarly, not all parks or open space land should be viewed as deer
habitat. This is especially true of land lying east of Highway 100 which is isolated from the
primary habitat afforded by the Nine Mile Creek corridor and Braemar Park. In our
opinion, that portion of Edina lying east of Highway 100 is highly urbanized and not well
suited to support a deer population. Therefore, no habitat has been delineated in this area.
The attached map illustrates Edina deer habitat. The area of this habitat is
approximately 1250 acres or two square miles. Based upon a recommended density of 15 -
25 deer per square mile, this habitat is capable of supporting 30 - 50 deer.
Based upon the 1992 and 1993 aerial population surveys, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources estimates that our Spring 1993 deer population was approximately 100
animals. The DNR has developed a model which is used to predict population growth.
(See attached letter from John Parker, Area Wildlife Manager.) Based upon this model,
the Edina deer population is projected to grow to 130 - 140 animals by Spring 1994. It
should be noted, however, that the model would have predicted a similar increase in the
population from 1992 to 1993. The aerial survey, however, indicates that the population
remained stable during this time. This stability could be due to a number of reasons
including: 1) higher mortality (e.g. deertvehicle collisions), 2) deer movement out of the
area, and /or 3) imprecise aerial surveys. Even if Edina's deer population has reached an
upper limit of 100 animals due to high annual mortality, this population is approximately
double what should be supported by our habitat.
In order to restore a better balance between the deer population and habitat, the
DNR estimates that 60 - 80 deer may have to be removed each year for two to three years
in order to reach a density of 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat. Given the uncertainty
concerning the current growth rate of our deer population, a more conservative removal rate
during the first year of a program is warranted. The DNR recommends, however, that no
fewer than 50 animals should be removed in the first year to effect a population reduction.
The population dynamics and removal recommendations could then be re- evaluated after
the 1994 aerial survey.
DEER POPULATION REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
Population reduction can be accomplished in a variety of ways:
o Regulated Hunting
o Trapping and transferring deer to other locations
o Trapping and Killing
o Sharpshooters
o Birth Control
o Allow nature to take its course
5
o Re- introduce Predators
Some of these alternatives are probably not feasible for Edina's situation. Regulated
hunting is clearly the most economical and effective method, but it simply is not feasible
given our level of development. Likewise, the re- introduction of natural predators such as
timber wolves or mountain lions is not possible in our area. Other techniques deserve
individual discussion.
A. Trapping and Transferring to Other Locations
Trapping and translocating deer is often viewed as our acceptable alternative
to control programs such as hunting or sharpshooting. However, a recent
study of a translocation program in Wisconsin concludes that translocation is
difficult to justify as a humane alternative to other methods. Of the 12
translocated deer in the Wisconsin study that were equipped with radio -
telemetry collars, 10 were dead within 231 days of relocation. Although
relocation may be viable for reducing Edina's deer population, one should not
assume that translocated deer live idealized lives in other locations.
Translocated deer may also simply contribute to an overpopulation in their
new locations. The DNR believes that deer are at their biological carrying
capacity in all parts of Minnesota except the extreme northeasterly portion of
the state. Therefore, there is virtually nowhere to which deer could be
relocated that would contribute to the overall well -being of the population.
B. Birth Control
Birth control for deer may be a viable solution in the future. However, birth
control is not currently available for free roaming populations. Although
some contraceptives may be effective, none have been developed for deer
population control.
C. Allow Nature to Take Its Course
In the absence of a population control program, the deer population will
eventually reach the upper limit sustainable by Edina's habitat. It is difficult
to predict what this upper limit will be or what will happen when it's reached.
It is known that at such levels, populations are prone to disease or starvation
and a general diminution of population health. Prior to reaching this point,
it is likely that complaints concerning predation of plants will increase
markedly as will deer/vehicular collisions.
D. Sharpshooting
Sharpshooting has been used within the City of Bloomington since 1991.
Sharpshooting has been conducted by law enforcement officers who attended
training sessions prior to the start of the program. During the winter of 1992-
1993, sharpshooters killed 319 deer in Bloomington. The cost of
21
sharpshooting in 1991 -1992 averaged $68.23 per deer although the DNR
estimates a total cost including disposal of carcasses to exceed $100 /deer.
Carcasses are turned over to the DNR which distribute meat to food shelves
and other organizations.
Sharpshooting is an effective method of population control in areas where
hunting is not feasible. Safety is a primary consideration. In Edina, we
believe sharpshooting over baited locations would be feasible within parts of
Braemar Park. Other locations in Edina may be too intensely developed to
sharpshoot due to safety considerations. These locations would have to be
researched more carefully prior to sharpshooting.
D. Trap and Kill
The University of Minnesota oversees deer population control efforts in North
Oaks. Live traps were utilized on 32 sites in North Oaks in the winter of
1992 -1993. A total of 171 deer were captured using this technique. Deer
were destroyed following capture. The cost per deer was $131.00.
Trapping and killing deer appears to be an effective method of population
control, especially in a fully- developed area. However, it may not be as
effective as sharpshooting and is clearly more expensive. The University has
recommended that the North Oaks trapping program be augmented with
sharpshooting in that sufficient numbers of deer cannot be eliminated through
trapping alone to achieve population goals.
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our review of the population data, the public opinion survey, review of
the literature, discussions with wildlife managers, and discussions with representatives of
other cities, staff concludes the following:
o Edina's deer population is part of a larger heard which populates principally
Bloomington and Eden Prairie.
o The deer population in Edina is increasing relatively rapidly and appears to
have exceeded the population density standards used by the DNR and other
cities. It is impossible to predict if and when the deer population will reach
levels which will result in severe deterioration of the health of the population.
o The deer population in parts of Edina may have exceeded the cultural
carrying capacity based upon the responses to our public opinion survey.
However, residents have differing opinions as to the desirability of deer in
their neighborhoods and methods which should be used for deer population
control.
7
o Staff estimates approximately two square miles of suitable habitat in Edina.
Based upon a population density of 15 - 25 deer per square mile, 30 - 50 deer
can be supported by our habitat. Our current deer population based upon the
1993 aerial survey is approximately 100 animals. Based upon the potential
growth rate of the population, a significant number of animals have to be
removed over the course of two to three years if the City wishes to reduce the
population to a level more commensurate with its habitat.
o Unfortunately, techniques for reducing deer populations without killing
individual animals are not currently available. The most feasible techniques
for deer population reduction are the removal of a predetermined number of
animals by trained sharpshooters or live trapping animals and destroying them
humanely.
o Staff believes that trained sharp shooters could be employed in a safe manner
in the westerly portion of Braemar Park during the winter months. (The City
already maintains a gun range in this area.) No other areas of the City
appear to be feasible for sharp shooting due to the proximity of the human
population. In such areas, trapping followed by killing of animals may be
feasible. The most likely locations for a trapping program would be Bredesen
Park, Van Valkenburg Park, and Todd Park.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon our investigations, we recommend the following:
o The Council should authorize a three year program with an objective of
reducing Edina's deer population to 40 - 50 animals. If the program is
authorized to start this winter, an initial goal of removing 50 animals should
be established. Staff notes that it may be very difficult to reach this initial
goal due to a late start for the program. (As the winter progresses, it will be
increasingly difficult to attract deer to baited sites for sharpshooting or
trapping.) As an alternative, the program could commence next winter with
revised removal objectives based upon the 1994 aerial survey. If the Council
authorizes a three year program, staff would proceed to develop specific
sharpshooting and /or trapping strategies for implementation.
o Staff recommends passage of an ordinance amendment prohibiting the
artificial feeding of deer. Although feeding probably has little effect on the
health or population level of the deer herd, it may attract deer into residential
areas where they may then prey on landscaping or become more susceptible
to vehicular mishaps.
o The City and State should devise a better system of documenting vehicular
8
accidents involving deer. It is possible that many accidents occurring on the
Crosstown, Highway 100 and Highway 169 may not be reported to us. This
information is necessary to evaluate the relationship between our deer
population and the risk of vehicular accidents.
o The City should continue to cooperate with Hennepin Parks and other
jurisdictions in the annual aerial survey of the deer population. This
information is essential to measure the dynamics of the deer population and
effects of population control efforts.
o The ideal deer population for Edina is more a function of the cultural
carrying capacity than its biological carrying capacity. As such, we must
improve our methods of recording complaints /concerns that are received at
City Hall regarding deer. As with the annual aerial survey, this would provide
a method of measuring the effects of changes in the deer population.
December 1993
0
;612; 772 - 7981 12/02/93
?iie:GHLETTER,ltr
Area wildlife Office
Metro Region Headquarters
1200 warner Road
Saint ?au- MN 55106
Gordon uc: :es
Edina Assistant City Manager
4801 w 50th: Street
Edina SIN 55424
Dear 111.r. -Hughes:
At your request, y have examined Edina's aerial deer survey data
fro- 1992 and ;993. T_ have uses :his data Jr. our deer population
:ode- to get a rough indication of :he number of deer which would
have to be removed if the City decides that population control is
needed.
T estimated the pre -fawn 1993 (April -May) population to be 100.
This is based on survey courts of 95 in 1992 and 84 in 1993. 'These
counts seem to indicate a stable oopulation. Our model would
predict an increasing population. Starting with- a population of
100, and assumJ ng relat ve -y -ow reproduction, a population of 100
in 1993 should grow to about 130 to 140 by April 1994. The
stability could be due to nigher thar. expected mortality (deer -
vehicle collisions), deer movement out of the area, or imprecision
in the survey.
You have identified the Dotentia- deer habitat in Edina to consist
of about 2 square miles. The population density would be at least
50 per square mi -e of habitat. 1 would consider this to be a high
density and I would expect problems such as damage to commercial,
residential, and natural vegetation, and high rates or vehicle
col- isions. The DNR and US Fish^ & wildlife Service have
established a deer population density goal of 15 to 25 deer per
square ..._le in the Fort Snelling State _Iari: ^:innesota Valley
Refuge a= ea .
DEER REytOVAL. Modeiiing results indicate that your population
could be reduced to about 40 tc 5O by removing 100 deer this
winter. iin der a Low reproduction assu otion., a removal of 50 deer
per year for two years would reduce t: ^e herd to 60 to 70. under a
normal reproduction assumt) -lion, -_-.is -eveL of removal wouid Lead to
no c_ ^_a_nge _n t_ ^.e Dopu'atio_n or e ,en a sIigght increase. you
dec -de to remove deer, y would recommend that you start with no
fewer than 50 Der year. Actually, 60 to 80 per year would probably
resu -t in a gradual decrease - a c range from 50 - 60 per square
mile to 15 - 25 deer per square mile in 2 to 3 years. These goals
should be set after an aeria-1 survey this January. They should be
modified based on subsecuer_t aerial surveys. Two or more surveys
0
ugaes
Page 2
12/02/93
may even be made is the same year during control to check on
progress.
wiii do some more modelling before the council meeting. will
ire avaiiab_e zo assist wit^ goal- setting _a your decis4on is to
control deer.
Sincere. - -
n Parker, area wildlife Manager
cc: Roger io ^rson
REFERENCES
The following sources were used as a basis for this report and recommendations:
1. Mark R. Ellingwood and Suzanne L. Caturano, An Evaluation of Deer
Management Options. 1988.
2. Jay B. McAninch and Jon M. Parker, Urban Deer Management Programs: A
Facilitated Approach. Transactions of the Fifty -sixth North American and
Natural Resources Conference. 1991.
3. Jay B. McAninch. Contraception in White- Tailed Deer, Status of Current
Activities. Minnesota D.N.R. Memo, March 10, 1993.
4. Greg Ingraham. 1993 -94 Program Summary and Deer Control Results 1991 -
933, City of Bloomington Memo. August 12, 1993.
5. City of Edina, Deer Survey. Results. September, 1993.
6. Peter A. Jordan, Ronald A. Moen, and Dale L-. Krueger. Management of a
Suburban Deer Population in the City of North Oaks, Minnesota. Memo.
May 28, 1993.
7. Beverly K. Bryant and William Ishmael. Movement and Mortality Patterns
of Resident and Translocated Suburban White- Tailed Deer. Wildlife
Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. 1991.
8. Excerpt From Disease Control Newsletter. Minnesota Department of Health.
June, 1993.
L
PROPOSED DEER POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
BACKGROUND
The City Council has discussed the concept of deer population control on several
occasions during the past five years. In 1988, representatives of the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources and Hennepin Parks discussed deer population dynamics and
movements with the City Council. These representatives noted that Edina's deer population
is part of a larger herd which occupies Bloomington and Eden Prairie. They noted that
population reduction efforts in Edina alone would probably be unsuccessful due to deer
immigration for the other cities.
In the winter of 1991 -1992, the City of Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, the DNR, and
the Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a deer control program within Bloomington. In 1991-
1992, 335 deer were killed by sharpshooters and sport hunters. In the winter of 1992 -1993,
369 deer were killed. For this coming winter, a goal of 370 deer kills has been established.
In future years, lower numbers of deer kills will be required in order to maintain a deer
population density of approximately 22 deer per square mile of habitat.
The City of Eden Prairie has established a committee for the purpose of
recommending population control alternatives to the City Council. At present, the
Committee has not completed its work. Due to Bloomington's program and Eden Prairie's
possible program, a control program in Edina may now be more feasible.
1
f
On September 20, 1993, the Edina City Council received the results of a survey
concerning Edina's deer population that was included in the Spring issue of About Town.
On October 4, 1993, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation
concerning deer population management in Edina.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
White- tailed deer are the most abundant and best -known large herbivore in the
United States. Deer are extremely adaptable for co- existence with the human population
and enjoy a high -rate of reproductive success even within major metropolitan areas.
Edina's deer herd has increased significantly during the past 10 years. Winter aerial
surveys flown by Hennepin Parks show the deer population in the Braemar Park area
increased from six animals in 1984 to 52 animals in 1993. Hennepin Parks reported similar
increases in neighboring cities.
Increases in Edina's deer population coupled with the development of remaining
lands have led to more and more contacts between deer and residents. Many of these
encounters are welcomed by residents. However, as the deer and human populations have
grown, more and more of the encounters have become unwelcome. The following concerns
have been expressed by residents:
2
1.
J
A
o Public Health Issues - Especially Lyme Disease
o Plant/Landscaping Damage
o Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
A. Public Health/Lyme Disease
Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria which can be carried by deer ticks. The
disease is not usually fatal but can cause a variety of symptoms including fever,
chills, headache, dizziness, muscle aches, joint pain and chronic fatigue. The
disease also affects the cardiac and nervous system and can lead to arthritic
conditions and /or heart arrhythmia. Early diagnosis of the disease aids in
successful treatment using antibiotics.
The deer tick is carried by a variety of warm blooded animals. Not only white-
tailed deer but also mice, birds, woodchucks, dogs, cattle, and other animals
are hosts for the deer tick. It is now believed that the adult deer tick will feed
on a larger host such as a dog or deer before dropping off and laying eggs on
the ground. The nymph stage is believed to feed on smaller animals such as
rodents and birds. The nymph stage of the tick is very small, about the size
of a pin head and is extremely difficult to detect. Birds may play a major role
in dissemination of the deer tick.
The mere presence of deer ticks in the environment does not mean the risk
3
for Lyme disease is present. The tick must harbor the bacteria which cause
Lyme disease and not all ticks have the bacteria. Some areas of the country
have a very low incidence of the bacteria in the ticks (less than 10 %) and
other areas have as high as 90% of the ticks positive for the bacteria.
The Minnesota Department of Health has conducted investigations of Lyme
disease since 1982. During 1991 and 1992, 161 cases of Lyme disease were
reported in the Twin Cities area. Only 22% of these cases had likely exposure
within the metro area and most of these exposures occurred in Anoka and
Washington counties which adjoin those portions of Minnesota and Wisconsin
with the major concentration of Lyme disease harboring ticks. The results of
the Department of Health surveillance confirm that the risk for acquiring
Lyme disease in most of the metro area is less than one per 100,000
population annually. The risk is particularly low in the southern and western
suburbs. Although Lyme disease must be continually studied, based upon the
above data, the control of Edina's deer population as a Lyme disease
preventative is not warranted.
Some residents have expressed concern regarding excessive feces produced by
deer. Although this may present an occasional nuisance, no significant public
health risks are associated with deer feces.
4
B. Plant and Landscape Damage
Deer predation of landscaping, especially ornamentals, is the most commonly
received complaint with respect to deer. Although deer are not the only
wildlife species contributing to such damage, they probably are responsible for
most large scale predation. City staff provides written materials as well as a
video to interested residents who wish to discourage predation. Preventative
techniques such as fencing and repellents have been shown to be effective in
reducing damage. However, these techniques, especially the use of repellents,
require a serious commitment by affected residents. Normal residential
fencing is not effective as a deterrent unless it is very tall. Other fence designs
or electric fencing may be effective but might not be compatible with uses of
adjacent properties.
Some repellents are effective in reducing predation. However, constant
vigilance is necessary to maintain effectiveness. Repellents must be reapplied
periodically based upon weather conditions and the growth rate of vegetation.
Given the cost, repellents are most effective for relatively small landscaped
areas.
If the City's deer population is reduced, will predation of landscaping be
eliminated? Probably not, although the frequency and magnitude of predation
should be reduced. Even if the City were to attempt to eliminate all deer
9
Y
from Edina, it is virtually impossible to effect this level of control. Therefore,
even with an aggressive population control program, some predation will
continue. Residents living in high deer population areas are best advised to
design or modify landscape areas to reduce the potential for predation. For
its part, the City should make known to residents any advancements or
improvements in fencing and repellent technology.
C. Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
Automobile /deer collisions are an on -going concern and the risk of such
collisions increases as deer populations and traffic volumes increase. The area
of greatest concern is Highway 169 and the Crosstown Highway west of
Highway 100 where the speed and volume of traffic contributes to more
serious deer collisions, or collisions with other vehicles while drivers attempt
to avoid deer. Although collisions also occur on City streets, the speed of
vehicles in such settings reduces the chance of serious injury. Significant
vehicle damage, however, can occur at even reduced speeds.
Some residents have reported that deer have become extremely tame and no
longer flee at the sight of people. Some residents are concerned that such
deer may become hostile and present a risk to personal safety. Although deer
may occasionally startle a homeowner, reports of attacks by wild deer are
almost non - existent. (Attacks by captive deer seem more common.)
POPULATION GROWTH AND CARRYING CAPACITY
Deer are very successful reproducers. A mature doe typically produces twins annually
and may produce triplets. The University of Minnesota reports an average of 1.33 fetuses
per mature doe in a study of North Oaks, Minnesota. In the absence of natural predators
and sport hunting, and with proper habitat, an area's deer population can increase rapidly.
Hyland Park Reserve's population was estimated to have doubled in seven years immediately
preceding commencement of a control program. The North Oaks population increased from
240 deer in 1976 to about 800 deer in 1993 even though population control programs were
implemented in seven of those years.
Deer populations eventually reach an upper limit based on the quality and amount
of food sources as well as the availability of winter habitat. The upper limit at which deer
remain in good physical condition is referred to as the Biological Carrying Capacity. As the
Carrying Capacity is exceeded, the physical condition of the population and its habitat
deteriorate. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources estimates the biological
carrying capacity for deer habitat in this area is 15 - 25 animals per square mile.
Although biological carrying capacity provides a proper measure of deer population
and habitat health, it may not be an appropriate measure of deer populations in urban
areas. As such, some have suggested the term "Cultural Carrying Capacity" as a better
standard for urban areas. Cultural Carrying Capacity, or the maximum number of deer that
can co -exist compatibly with local human populations, is a function of the sensitivity of
7
people to the presence of deer. Cultural Carrying Capacity is understandably much more
difficult to measure than Biological Carrying Capacity in that different individuals have
different sensitivities to the deer population.
RECON04ENDED POPULATION OBJECTIVES
As noted earlier, the Minnesota DNR estimates the biological carrying capacity for
deer to be 15 -25 animals per square mile. Such estimates, however, are reflective of the
quality of available habitat. Such estimates, likewise, do not reflect the cultural carrying
capacity desired by Edina residents. Therefore, establishing population objectives for Edina
is clearly more of an art than a science.
For purposes of establishing population objectives, we have attempted to identify deer
habitat within Edina. Habitat comprises adequate food, water, protective cover, and living
space in a suitable arrangement to promote a healthy population. For population purposes,
we believe that only those lands set aside as parks or open space, or large tracts of
undeveloped private land should constitute deer habitat. Although deer roam widely and
utilize many areas such as residential lots, we believe that such areas do not provide all of
the necessary components of deer habitat and, therefore, should not be relied upon for
population purposes. Similarly, not all parks or open space land should be viewed as deer
habitat. This is especially true of land lying east of Highway 100 which is isolated from the
primary habitat afforded by the Nine Mile Creek corridor and Braemar Park. In our
opinion, that portion of Edina lying east of Highway 100 is highly urbanized and not well
suited to support a deer population. Therefore, no habitat has been delineated in this area.
The attached map illustrates Edina deer habitat. The area of this habitat is
approximately 1250 acres or two square miles. Based upon DNR carrying capacity
estimates, this habitat is capable of supporting 30 - 50 deer.
Based upon the 1992 and 1993 aerial population surveys, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources estimates that our Spring 1993 deer population was approximately 100
animals. The DNR has developed a model which is used to predict population growth. (See
attached letter from John Parker, Area Wildlife Manager.) Based upon this model, the
Edina deer population is projected to grow to 130 - 140 animals by Spring 1994. It should
be noted, however, that the model would have predicted a similar increase in the population
from 1992 to 1993. The aerial survey, however, indicates that the population remained
stable during this time. This stability could be due to a number of reasons including: 1)
higher mortality (e.g. deer/vehicle collisions), 2) deer movement out of the area, and /or 3)
imprecise aerial surveys. Even if Edina's deer population has reached an upper limit of 100
animals due to high annual mortality, this population is approximately double what should
be supported by our habitat.
In order to restore a better balance between the deer population and habitat, the
DNR estimates that 60 - 80 deer may have to be removed each year for two to three years
in order to reach a density of 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat. Given the uncertainty
E
concerning the current growth rate of our deer population; a more conservative removal rate
during the first year of a program is warranted. The DNR recommends, however, that no
fewer than 50 animals should be removed in the first year to effect a population reduction.
The population dynamics and removal recommendations could then be re- evaluated after
the 1994 aerial survey.
DEER POPULATION REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
Population reduction can be accomplished in a variety of ways:
• Regulated Hunting
• . Trapping and transferring deer to other locations
• Trapping and Killing
0 Sharpshooters
• Birth Control
• Allow nature to take its course
• Re- introduce Predators
Some of these alternatives are probably not feasible for Edina's situation. Regulated
hunting is clearly the most economical and effective method, but it simply is not feasible
given our level of development. Likewise, the re- introduction of natural predators such as
timber wolves or mountain lions is not possible in our area. Other techniques deserve
individual discussion.
10
A. Trapping and Transferring to Other Locations
Trapping and translocating deer is often viewed as our acceptable alternative
to. control programs such as hunting or sharpshooting. However, a recent
study of a translocation program in Wisconsin concludes that translocation is
difficult to justify as a humane alternative to other methods. Of the 12
translocated deer in the Wisconsin study that were equipped with radio-
telemetry collars, 10 were dead within 231 days of relocation. Although
relocation may be viable for reducing Edina's deer population, one should not
assume that translocated deer live idealized lives in other locations.
Translocated deer may also simply contribute to an overpopulation in their
new locations. The DNR believes that deer are at their biological carrying
capacity in all parts of Minnesota except the extreme northeasterly portion of
the state. Therefore, there is virtually nowhere to which deer could be
relocated that would contribute to the overall well -being of the population.
B. Birth Control
Birth control for deer may be a viable solution in the future. However, birth
control is not currently available for free roaming populations. Although some
contraceptives may be effective, none have been developed for deer
population control.
11
C. Allow Nature to Take Its Course
In the absence of a population control program, the deer population will
eventually reach the upper limit sustainable by Edina's habitat. It is difficult
to predict what this upper limit will be or what will happen when it's reached.
It is known that at such levels, populations are prone to disease or starvation
and a general diminution of population health. Prior to reaching this point,
it is likely that complaints concerning predation of plants will increase
markedly as will deer/vehicular collisions.
D. Sharpshooting
Sharpshooting has been used within the City of Bloomington since 1991.
Sharpshooting has been conducted by law enforcement officers who attended
training sessions prior to the start of the program. During the winter of 1992-
1993, sharpshooters killed 319 deer in Bloomington. The cost of
sharpshooting in 1991 -1992 averaged $68.23 per deer although the DNR
estimates a total cost including disposal of carcasses to exceed $100 /deer.
Carcasses are turned over to the DNR which distribute meat to food shelves
and other organizations.
Sharpshooting is an effective method of population control in areas where
hunting is not feasible. Safety is a primary consideration. In Edina, we
believe sharpshooting over baited locations would be feasible within parts of
12
Braemar Park. Other locations in Edina may be too intensely developed to
sharpshoot due to safety considerations. These locations would have to be
researched more carefully prior to sharpshooting.
D. Trap and Kill
The University of Minnesota oversees deer population control efforts in North
Oaks. Live traps were utilized on 32 sites in North Oaks in the winter of
1992 -1993. A total of 171 deer were captured using this technique. Deer
were destroyed following capture. The cost per deer was $131.00.
Trapping and killing deer appears to be an effective method of population
control, especially in a fully- developed area. However, it may not be as
effective as sharpshooting and is clearly more expensive. The University has
recommended that the North Oaks trapping program be augmented with
sharpshooting in that sufficient numbers of deer cannot be eliminated through
trapping alone to achieve population goals.
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our review of the population data, the public opinion survey, review of
the literature, discussions with wildlife managers, and discussions with representatives of
other cities, staff concludes the following:
13
® Edina's deer population is part of a larger heard which populates principally
Bloomington and Eden Prairie.
• The deer population in Edina is increasing relatively rapidly and appears to
have exceeded the carrying capacity of available habitat based upon standards
recommended by the DNR. It is impossible to predict if and when the deer
population will reach levels which will result in severe deterioration of the
health of the population.
® The deer population in parts of Edina may have exceeded the cultural
carrying capacity based upon the responses to our public opinion survey.
However, residents have differing opinions as to the desirability of deer in
their neighborhoods and methods which should be used for deer population
control.
® Staff estimates approximately two square miles of suitable habitat in Edina.
Based upon a recommended carrying capacity of 15 - 25 deer per square mile,
30 - 50 deer can be supported by our habitat. Our current deer population
based upon the 1993 aerial survey is approximately 100 animals. Based upon
the potential growth rate of the population, a significant number of animals
have to be removed over the course of two to three years if the City wishes
to reduce the population to a level more commensurate with its habitat.
• Unfortunately, techniques for reducing deer populations without killing
individual animals are not currently available. The most feasible techniques
for deer population reduction are the removal of a predetermined number of
14
animals by trained sharpshooters or live trapping animals and destroying them
humanely.
• Staff believes that trained sharp shooters could be employed in a safe manner
in the westerly portion of Braemar Park during the winter months. (The City
already maintains a gun range in this area.) No other areas of the City
appear to be feasible for sharp shooting due to the proximity of the human
population. In such areas, trapping followed by killing of animals may be
feasible. The most likely locations for a trapping program would be Bredesen
Park, Van Valkenburg Park, and Todd Park.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon our investigations, we recommend the following:
• The Council should authorize a three year program with an objective of
reducing Edina's deer population to 40 - 50 animals. , If the program is
authorized to start this winter, an initial goal of removing 50 animals should
be established. Staff notes that it may be very difficult to reach this initial
goal due to a late start for the program. (As the winter progresses, it will be
increasingly difficult to attract deer to baited sites for sharpshooting or
trapping.) As an alternative, the program could commence next winter with
revised removal objectives based upon the 1994 aerial survey. If the Council
authorizes a three year program, staff would proceed to develop specific
sharpshooting and /or trapping strategies for implementation.
15
• Staff recommends passage of an ordinance amendment prohibiting the
artificial feeding of deer. Although feeding probably has little effect on the
health or population level of the deer herd, it may attract deer into residential
areas where they may then prey on landscaping or become more susceptible
to vehicular mishaps.
e The City and State should devise a better system of documenting vehicular
accidents involving deer. It is possible that many accidents occurring on the
Crosstown, Highway 100 and Highway 169 may not be reported to us. This
information is necessary to evaluate the relationship between our deer
population and the risk of vehicular accidents.
• The City should continue to cooperate with Hennepin Parks and other
jurisdictions in the annual aerial survey of the deer population. This
information is essential to measure the dynamics of the deer population and
effects of population control efforts.
The ideal deer population for Edina is more a function of the cultural carrying
capacity than its biological carrying capacity. As such, we must improve our
methods of recording complaints /concerns that are received at City Hall
regarding deer. As with the annual aerial survey, this would provide a method
of measuring the effects of changes in the deer population.
December, 1993
16
DMR CARLOS AVERY WMA TEL :612 -296 -5202 Dec 02.93 10,22 No.003 P.01
(612) 772 -79R1
12/02/93
Fi .le: GHLETTER. ltr
Area Wildlife Office
Metro Region Headquarters
1200 Warner Road
Saint Paul MN 55106
Gordon Hughes
Edina Assistant City Manager
4001 W 50th Street
F..dina MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hiighes
At your request, I have examined ELiiiia Is aerial deer survey data
from 1991 and 1993. T have used this data in our deer population
model to get a rouyli indication of the number of deer which would
have to be removed if the City decides that population control is
needed.
I estimated the pre -fawn 1993 (April -May) population to be 100.
This is Lased on survev counts or 95 in 1942 and 84 in 1993. These
counts seem to indicate a stable population. Our mode! Would
predict an increasing Population. Starting with a population of
100, and assuming relatively low reproduction, a population of 100
in .1993 should grow to about 130 to 140 by April 1994. The
alability could be due to higher than expected mortality (deer.-
vehicle collisions), deer movement out of the area, or imprecision
In the survey.
You have identified the potential deer laablla.t in Edina to consist
Of about 2 square miles. The population density would be at least
60 per square mile ur liabitat. I would consider this to be a high
density and I would expect problems such as damage to commercial,
residential, and natural vegetation, and high rates of vehicle
collisiono. The DNR acid US Fish & Wildlite Service have
established a deer population density goal of 15 to 25 deer per
oquare wile in the Fort Snelling State Park / Minnesota valley
Refuge area.
DEER REMOVAL. Modelliiiy results Indicate that your pnpulation
could be reduced to about 40 to 60 by removing 100 deer this
winter. Under a low reproduction assumption, a removal of 60 deer
per year for two years would reduce the herd to 60 to 70. Under a
normal reproduction assumption, this level of removal would lead cu
no change in the population or even a slight increase. If you
deride to remove deer, I would recommend that you start with no
fewer than 50 per year. Actually, 60 to 80 per year would probably
result in a gradual decrease - a change from bU - 60 per square
mile to 15 25 dyer per square mile in 2 to 3 years. These goals
should be set after an aerial survey this January. They should be
mndifiee% based on subsequent aerial surveys. Two or more surveys
DPIP CAPLOS AUERY WMA TEL:612 -29.6 -5202 Dec 02.93 10:23 NIo.003 P.02
Hughes
Page 2
12/02/93
may eve:i be made in the same year during control to check on
progress..
I will do some more modelling before the counril-mPeting. I wil?,
be avokilable to assiet with goai-- setting if yuur decision is to
cuuLrol deer.
Sincere
O#n Parker, Area Wildlife Manager
cc: Roger Johnson
September 1993
CITY OF EDINA
DEER SURVEY RESULTS
Since 1984, the City of Edina has participated with Hennepin Parks in an aerial
survey of deer populations. Aerial surveys were conducted in 1984, 1985, 1986,
1988, 1991, 1992, and 1993. Although different parts of Edina were surveyed from
year to year, the Braemar Park area was surveyed each year. In 1984, six deer were
counted in the Braemar Park area. By 1993, the Braemar Park count had reached 52
deer. During the same time period, the number of deer related calls received by City
Hall increased markedly. Most calls concerned deer predation of landscaping.
In November 1992, City staff participated in a meeting with representatives of
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Hennepin Parks, and the Cities of
Bloomington and Eden Prairie. On that occasion, City staff received a briefing
concerning deer population control activities in Bloomington and Hennepin Parks.
Based upon the Bloomington experience, staff elected to supplement the annual aerial
survey data concerning deer populations with a survey of our residents. The City of
Eden Prairie also agreed to conduct such a survey.
The questionnaire that was used for the Edina survey was nearly identical to
that used by Bloomington. The Bloomington survey had been developed with the
input of area wildlife and natural resources managers.
Our survey was included in the Spring 1993 edition of About Town which was
delivered to all dwelling units in the City on about the first of May. Survey responses
were accepted for tabulation until July 1. Only six surveys were returned after July
1.
About Town is received by approximately 21,000 households in the City. 294
surveys were returned and tabulated for an overall response rate of 1.4 %. The
response rate for that portion, of the City, located west of Highway 100, was
approximately 3 percent and the rate for the southwest quadrant was approximately
4 percent. This response rate was disappointing and falls far short of the 22%
response rate achieved in Bloomington which distributed their questionnaires with
quarterly water billings. Based upon our response rate it may be difficult to assume
that this survey is statistically representative of all City residents. A more
representative sample would require more sophisticated survey techniques such as an
individual mailing or a telephone survey.
Many responders to the survey expressed appreciation to the City for making
an effort to solicit citizen input. Some responders, however, were critical of the
survey noting that, in their opinion, it was biased to elicit a response from residents
who favored deer population control. Although residents who favored no population
control were well represented in survey responses, the Council should consider this
criticism when reviewing the survey results.
This survey represents only one factor which should be considered with respect
to deer population control. Other factors include the population data which have been
collected over the years, the advice of wildlife managers and other experts, and the
public safety implications of any population control program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A ten question survey concerning Edina's deer population was included in the
Spring issue of About Town. Responses were accepted for tabulation until July 1,
1993. 294 surveys were returned for a response rate of 1.4% of all households.
Thirteen percent of the surveys returned were from households located east of
Highway 100. The remainder of the responses came from west of Highway 100 with
the southwest quadrant of the City having the highest response rate.
FINDINGS
o Long -term residents over 50 years of age composed a disproportionately high
percentage of survey responders. This response may be due to the age
characteristics of single - family homeowners in the western part of the City
which had the highest response rate.
0 52% of all responders felt that there was a deer overpopulation problem in their
area. 70% of the responders from the southwest quadrant indicated an
overpopulation problem.
0 59% of all responders felt that deer were an asset to the community although
most who thought they were an asset also felt they should be controlled in
some fashion. 36% of all responders viewed the deer population only as a
liability.
0 15% of all responders did not support any form of population control. 18%
supported only the issuance of variances to allow fences that would permit
homeowners to protect their property. Therefore, 33% of all responders did not
favor any method of deer control that resulted in the death of individual
animals.
0 53% of the total supported population control that would clearly result in the
death of animals.
0 12% of the total favored either fence variances or deer relocation efforts even
if the loss of animals in the process of relocation was very likely.
0 59% of all responders favored the use of tax dollars for deer management.
QUESTION #1. WHAT IS YOUR AGE RANGE?
Most survey responses came from individuals over 50 years of age. This group
represented a disproportionately high percentage of responders (61.2 %)
compared with their representation in the total population (39.0% based on
1990.Census).
Age Range of People Responding
to the Survey
No Response (1.7% 20 -30 (2.7%)
- 30.40 (11.6%)
Over 60 (35.7%) — —
(22.8%)
60-60 (26.6 0/6)
QUESTION #2. HOW MANY YEARS HAVE YOU BEEN AN EDINA RESIDENT?
Most responders were long -time Edina residents. Nearly 70% of all responders
have been residents for over 10 years and nearly one -half (44.2 %) have been
residents over 20 years.
No R
Over 20 years (44.2%)
How many years have you been
a resident of Edina?
10 years (27.6%)
1 years (26.6 %)
QUESTION #3. WHAT STREET INTERSECTION IS CLOSEST TO YOUR HOME?
Of the 294 responses received, only 37 responses came from east of Highway
100. 107 responses came from the northwest quadrant (north of Crosstown
and west of Highway 100) and 150 responses came from the southwest
quadrant (south of Crosstown and west of Highway 100).
QUESTION #4A. DO YOU BELIEVE THERE IS A DEER OVER - POPULATION
PROBLEM IN YOUR AREA?
52% of all responders indicated that there was an over - population problem and
approximately 45% indicated no problem. However, in the southwest quadrant
of the City, 70% of the responders indicated an over - population problem.
Is There a Deer Overpopulation Problem
In Your Area?
No Respo1_&Yes
No (44.9%) (62.00/6)
QUESTION #46. HAVE YOU TRIED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
31.3% of all responders noted that they have attempted to solve the
overpopulation problem with respect to damage to vegetation. 15% stated that
special fencing was tried and 26.2% reported that they had used repellents in
an attempt to reduce damage.
QUESTION #5. HAVE YOU EVER LIVED NEAR A WILDLIFE AREA BEFORE?
42% of all responders stated that they now or had previously lived by a wildlife
area.
QUESTION #6. IS THERE INTENTIONAL FEEDING OF DEER IN YOUR IMMEDIATE
NEIGHBORHOOD?
Intentional feeding may encourage deer to move from more natural habitat to
neighborhoods. 17.7% of all responders noted that feeding was occurring in
their neighborhood.
Is there Intentional Feeding of Deer
In your Neighborhood?
No Respoi
Do not know (14.61/6)
7.7%)
It is difficult to determine if artificial feeding is a problem
based on this response. Many responders may know of the
same one or two individuals who feed deer in a particular
neighborhood.
QUESTION #7. HOW MANY DEER DO YOU BELIEVE ARE WITHIN FOUR SQUARE
BLOCKS OF YOUR HOME?
This question was very difficult for most responders to answer. A very large
range of responses were given which proved nearly impossible to tabulate.
QUESTION #8. DO YOU SEE DEER AS...?
Responders were asked to express their viewpoint as to whether deer were:
a positive community asset
a health hazard
an asset, if controlled
a financial /economic issue
a traffic safety hazard
a nuisance but not a health hazard
Many responders had multiple viewpoints. The 294 responders to the survey
checked a total of 598 blanks. For example, an individual responder may have
indicated that deer were a "positive community asset" but also indicated that
deer were a "traffic safety hazard."
The following chart shows the breakdown of all 598 responses to the question
Total Views on Deer Problem
In Edina
Other(4.3%)
Nuisance But Not HeM ProtL (10.7%) — /—Communriy Asset (19.4 %)
Tra1Hc Safety Hazard (22.1 %) t
Hazard (152%)
Flrtaatdat Qttestlon (9A %) J —"aMM==W"tAsset tf Controued (792 %)
Survey responses were further analyzed to determine the number of responders
who checked the blank indicating "positive community asset ". Of the 294
surveys returned, 48 or 16% of the responders offered this viewpoint only. 40
responders, or 14% of the total indicated "positive community asset" but also
indicated "an asset, if controlled." 24 responders, or 8% of the total indicated
"positive community asset" but also noted that deer were a health hazard, a
financial /economic issue, a traffic safety hazard, or a nuisance.
63 responders or 21 % of the total indicated that deer were "an asset, if
controlled." Many of these responders checked one or more of the blanks
noting "a health hazard," "a financial /economic issue," "a traffic safety issue"
or "a nuisance but not health hazard."
107 responders or 36% of the total checked one or more of the blanks other
than "a positive community asset" or "an asset, if controlled." These
responders apparently viewed deer only as a health hazard, traffic safety
hazard, financial /economic issue, or a nuisance. All of these responders also
supported some method of deer population control.
Based upon the response to question #8, 59% of all responders indicated that
deer were an asset to the community (most of these responders also felt that
some control was needed), 71 % of all responders indicated a need for some
type of population control (many of these responders also felt that deer were
an asset to the community). The type of control was the subject of the next
question.
QUESTION #9. CAN YOU SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING SUGGESTED DEER HERD
CONTROL METHODS? (Check all that apply)
Responders were asked to express their support of the following control
methods:
o Grant fence variances to individual property owners
o Move deer to other locations (high rate of animal loss should be
expected)
o Trap and kill deer, DNR monitored
o Allow private sharp- shooting of deer where feasible
o None of the above
As with Question #8, many responders had multiple viewpoints. The 294
responders to the survey checked a total of 495 blanks. For example, an
individual responder may have indicated support for fence variances as well as
private sharp- shooting.
The following chart shows the breakdown of all 495 responses to this question.
Prlrate Sharp Shooters (20.9 %)
Trap and Idll with DN
Total Suggested Methods
of Deer Management
d Fence Variances (20.7 %)
Deer to New Location (23.0%
Surveys were analyzed further as to the individual response of survey
participants. 43 responders or 15% of the total indicated no support for any
control measures. 53 responders or 18% of the total indicated support for
fence variances only. Therefore, 33% of the total supported no control efforts
or control efforts that did not result in the death of deer.
36 responders, or 12% or the total indicated support for either fence variances
or moving deer to other locations even if a high rate of animal loss should be
expected.
157 responders or 53% of the total supported control efforts that would result
in the death of deer.
As noted in question 4A., 44.9 percent of the responders indicated that they
did not believe there was a deer overpopulation problem in their area. Of this
group of responders, 27 percent indicated no support of any of the control
methods. 32 percent supported fence variances only. 12 percent supported
either fence variances or deer relocation even if a high rate of animal loss
should be expected. 29 percent supported methods that would result in animal
death.
52 percent of all responders indicated in question 4A., that they did believe
there was a deer over - population problem in their area. Of this group of
responders, 4 percent indicated no support of any of the control methods. 5
percent supported fence variances only. 13 percent supported either fence
variances or deer relocation even if a high rate of animal loss should be
expected. 78 percent supported methods that would result in animal death.
QUESTION #10. DO YOU SUPPORT THE USE OF CITY TAX DOLLARS FOR A
DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?
Do you support tax dollars
for Deer Control?
No Respor-
No (29.9 %)
(5920/0)
REFERENCES
The following sources were used as a basis for this report and recommendations:
1. Mark R. Ellingwood and Suzanne L. Caturano, An Evaluation of Deer
Management Options. 1988.
2. Jay B. McAninch and Jon M. Parker, Urban Deer Management Programs: A
Facilitated Approach. Transactions of the Fifty -sixth North American and
Natural Resources Conference. 1991.
3. Jay B. McAninch. Contraception in White - Tailed Deer. Status of Current
Activities. Minnesota D.N.R. Memo, March 10, 1993.
4. Greg Ingraham. 1993 -94 Program Summary and Deer Control Results 1991-
23, City of Bloomington Memo. August 12, 1993.
S. City of Edina, Deer Survey Results. September, 1993.
6. Peter A. Jordan, Ronald A. Moen, and Dale L. Krueger. Management of a
Suburban Deer Population in the City of North Oaks, Minnesota. Memo.
May 28, 1993.
7. Beverly K. Bryant and William Ishmael. Movement and Mortality Patterns
of Resident and Translocated Suburban White - Tailed Deer. Wildlife
Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. 1991.
8. Excerpt From Disease Control Newsletter. Minnesota Department of Health.
June, 1993.
��fn7�SV nTAATE OF
IH U IE S O UL%
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO. _ 1 2, — 8 l - 8 FILE NO.
,qr-L, Qox t e , /T tj 5"6O6 Z
MARCH 10, 1993
CONTRACEPTION IN WHITE- TAILED DEER
STATUS OF CURRENT ACTIVITIES
Jay McAninch
No registration of a wildlife contraceptive (vaccine or otherwise) either as
a pesticide (with the Environmental Protection Agency) or a drug (with the
United States Department of Agriculture or the Food and Drug Administration)
has been applied for or approved.
A remotely (close range) delivered immunocontraceptive (a non- species-
specific antigen) effective in controlling reproductive output in female
white - tailed deer has been developed and tested with success on confined
groups of deer.
No contraceptive research on free - ranging white - tailed deer has been
conducted or has been approved for initiation.
No species- specific, orally deliverable, immunocontraceptive technology
exists.
No model for evaluating the population impacts of any contraceptive system
has been developed.
Current research includes investigations of a species- specific epitope
(antigenic determinant) (USDA, Denver Wildlife Research Center), a non -
species- specific, zona pellucida antigen system (Smithsonian Institute and
National Park Service), a non - species- specific, control of the gonadotropin
releasing hormone (Rutgers University and Colorado State University) , and
species- specific immunity to the sperm plasma membrane (University of
Georgia).
The Animal Control Committee of the International Association of Fish and
Wildlife Agencies has been investigating issues associated with the
development and use of wildlife contraceptives. Important concerns are:
There is uncertainty concerning which Federal agency has authority over
fertility control materials in wildlife, especially as it relates to
their application for free - ranging populations.
Currently, state regulations and authorities are not precise enough to
control when, where, how, if and by whom contraceptive materials will be
used.
State wildlife agencies may have the authority to promulgate
administrative rules relating to the licensing of contraceptives if
these materials are proven to be effective for wildlife management.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
J
FACT SHEET
IMHUNOCONTRACEPTION AS A POPULATION MANAGEMENT
OPTION FOR
WHITE - TAILED DEER
The white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virainianus) population has grown to a level
beyond the carrying capacity of the habitat availablb in many areas in the
Minnesoti River Valley and adjacent areas. Cbntrol of the deer on the
Minnesota Valley NWR has been accomplished through the Alternative Deer
Control Program and sharpshooting since 1989 based on recommendations made by
the Deer Management Task Foreal. Immunocontracdptiort is a relatively new
technique for suppressing fertility which his been tested on a limited bAsid
for controlling deer population growth. This fhct sheet examines the
alternative of controlling the deer population through reproductive
suppression.
A variety of anti - fertility agents have been tested on female white- tailed
doer over the past 20 years+ including the steroids diethylstilbestrol (DES)
and melangestrolacetate (MGA)i synthetic progestins, and porcine zonae
pellucidab (PZP). The use of the anti - growth stimulant; DES, was discontinued
because it is harmful to human hbalth. In Addition+ oral administration of
antifertility agents has not been h reliable technique for several reasons.
• It has been difficult to assure that the treated bait is eaten at
leveld necessary to suppress reprodubtion. Deer have to be sufficiently
interested in supplemental feeding and should be monitored to assure
that the treated bait is consumed. Thib is logistically difficult to
achibve.
6 Deer develop an aversion to the oral treatment (Harder and Peterle
1974, as referenced in Bell and Peterle 1975) and, therefore, do not
receive a sufficient dose of the hormone to suppress reproduction.
• Non - target species may eat the bait (Kirkpatrick and Turner 1991),
causing a variety of unwanted defects including suppression of
reproduction, birth defects and death of those non - target species. In
addition, non - target species may assimilate the anti - fertility agents
through consumption of species or carrion that have been intentionally
or unintentionally treated.
• It is difficult to account for the feeding habits and range of
individual deer, adding to the logistical headache referred to above.
lA group of individuals from the Federal, State, County, and Local
governments as well as private organizations interested in deer population
control in the Minnesota River Valley.
1
ti
Several types of implants have been tested with mixed results. Steroid
implants suppressed fertility for only two breeding seasons and required
trapping and surgical implantation (Matschke 1979). Plotka and Seal 1989
suggest that these steroid implants may last several more years, but no
studies have been done to test this theory. Bell and Peterle 1975 tested
hormone implants and concluded that this may be an effective technique to use
where deer can be trappedi.sedated and implanted. An additional study of
chemosterilant implantation in captive deer on Angel Island in San Francisco
Bay demonstrated that reproduction could be suppressed for several breeding
a
seasons.
The cost of a project to capture deer and insert steroid implants is
prohibitive. The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals (SFSPCA)i. which funded the Angel Island study,.realized h cost of
approximately $1j000 per implanted doe (Botti 1985), Hunting efficiency data
indicate that the difficulty of finding target animals increases as the number
of animals one is searching for decreases. In addition, 50% - 70% of the does
in a population of deer must be rendered infertile to produce a stabilizing
effect on the population (Rice and Harder 1974, based on pens. comm. with Jay
McAninch): The problems associated with capturing does for implantation,
limited efficacy of the implants developed td date# high cost involved with
implementing this type of population control technique on a free - roaming
population, and lack of ability to effectively monitor results prohibits use
of this tool for management.
In an effort to develop additional control methods, researchers have tested
the use of remotely delivered immunocontraception as a potential population
control alternative,. Kirkpatrick et al. 1990 studied this technique on free -
roaming feral horses (Eauus aba us). They remotely delivered PZP injections
to suppress fertility. The PZP formula has several advantages over the
various chemosterilant formulas discussed above:
• PZP injected into pregnant females did not adversely affect the
pregnancy but subsequently inhibited fertility.
• A small volume' of the aqueous PZP vaccine is needed so it is easily
administered using a dart.
a The PZP is a protein ando as a result, should not be passed through
the food chain.
Several questions remain to be answered.before this technique could be
considered an option availabld to wildlife managers.
• Studies should be conducted to assure that treated meat consumed by
humans would be safe.
• The PZP vaccine currently requires at least two inoculations to
inhibit fertility. A single -dose vaccine must be developed. Research
is underway to formulate a single -dose vaccine through
microencapsulation and test the formula on a captive population.
91
• Research on white - tailed deer has only been conducted on a captive
population (Turner at al. 1992). Can this technique can be applied to a
free - roaming population? Remote delivery can be difficult where animals
gtb Mary and delivery idethods used to date are at close rdngd, less than
30 meters from the target aniddl (Jay HcAnindh. pens. cbmd.) What is
the definition of "remote ". It ,
• A standger needs to knout what porcentdge of thb females in a
population need to be infertile to stabilize the population. The
pioblbmd of administering this type of tbchniqub and monitoritig rdsults
bbbodd more edmplex #andh the population'ib impacted by dnimdls moving
into and out of an area.
Before thib technique could be used by wildlife managers, research should bb
conducted on feed- rodming populations of white - tailed debt. questiond remain
as to the effectiveness of this technique in reducing overall population
levels. Research must also address the effect of administering the vaccine to
pregnant lobs, which is inevitable when inoculating thdm remotely. In
addition, a method for identifying treated animals AdAds to be developed.
Immunbconttaception had prbiren to be d technique capable of suppressing
fertility. However, many logistical questions must be dnswbred before it'can
be considered a management option for free - roaming white - tailed deer.
0
4
Bibliography
tell, it. L. and T. J. Peterle. 1975. Hormone implants control reproduction
in white - tailed deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 3:152 -156_.
Botti, Fred L. 1985. Chemosterilants as a management option for deer on
Angel Island: lessons learned. Cal -Neva Wildl. Trans. p. 61 -65.
Ellingwood,
Nark k., and Suzanne L. Caturano. 1999. An evaluation bf deer
management options. New England Chapter/Thd Wildlife Society and the
Northeast beer Technical Committee.
Kirkpatrick, Jay F., Irwin K. M. Liu, and John W. Turner, Jr. 1990.
Remotely- delivered immunocontraception in feral horses. Wildl. Soc. Bull.
18:326 -330.
Matschke, George H. 1980. Efficacy of steroid implants in preventing
pregnancy in white - tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 44(3) :756 -758.
Plotka, E. D. and U. S. Seal. 1989. Fertility,control in female white-
tailed deer. J. Wild1. Dis. 25(4):643 -646..
a
Turner, John W., Irwin K. M. Liu, and Jay F. Kirkpatrick. 1992. Immuno-
contraception in white - tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 56(1):154 -157.
Minnesota Valley Deer Management Task Force. 1990. Final report and
„recommendations.
Item 3a
Aug. 17, 1993
NHRC Agenda
DATE: August 12, 1993
Inter-Off ice
CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Natural and Historical Resources Commission
FROM: Greg Ingraham, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: 1993 -94 Program Summary and Deer Control Results 1991 -93
Attached is the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) recommendation for
the 1993 -94 Deer Control Program. The memo summarizes the Alternative Deer Control
Program for the three city area of the Minnesota River valley and contains the deer survey
results /recommendations for Bloomington. The 1993 -4 Bloomington Deer Control
Program is summarized below and on the attached City map.
Bloomington Summary
The 1993 -94 Deer Control Program is the third year of a three year program approved in
1991. This year's goal is to remove approximately 370 deer in Bloomington by a
combination of sharpshooting and limited public hunting (Alternative Deer Control
Program). Last year's program removed 369 animals.
If the participating agencies (City of Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, DNR and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service) achieve their 1993 -94 removal goals, the Bloomington deer population
will be at the density level recommended by the DNR, Minnesota Valley Deer Task Force
and the City Comprehensive Plan.
1993 -94 Program Notes
Spring, 1993, aerial surveys showed a very high concentration of deer (103 deer per
square mile of habitat) in the Bloomington Ferry Unit of the Mn. Valley Wildlife Refuge.
Cooperative sharpshooting efforts between the City, DNR and USFWS should concentrate
on this area and the USFWS should assume 'a greater role in the program.
Hennepin County Parks had some difficulty reaching their 1992 -3 removal goal due to a
large number of deer leaving the public park areas during the sharpshooting periods.
Wildlife managers from the County and the DNR think many of the deer were attracted to
illegal private feeding sites near the park. The wildlife managers would like strict
enforcement of the feeding ban provisions this year. An increased education effort would
probably help encourage greater compliance.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the 1993 794 Deer Control Program and adoption of a deer
feeding ban similar to the 1992 -3 ordinance, but with a clear definition of deer feeding,
more enforcement efforts and-a pre- ban - education /notification - effort.
1
1991 -94 PROGRAM SUMMARY
In 1991, the City Council approved a, number of elements of a comprehensive deer
management program.
- A Wildlife Management Plan section of the Bloomington Comprehensive Plan.
A three year (1992 - 94) deer control program.
A goal of having 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat (approximately
300 deer).
- A commitment to review and re- evaluate the program after the three years of
control actions are completed (Summer, 1994).
- Annual helicopter census of deer population.
- Ordinance revisions to allow police officers and wildlife. officers to sharpshoot
deer as a control method.
- Ordinances banning intentional feeding of deer in areas of deer control actions
(November - March)
- Approval of City, Hennepin'County, MnDNR and USFWS sharpshooting and
alternative deer control (limited public hunting).
- Funding of overtime for police officers and park maintenance personnel to
conduct the deer removal program (approximately $ 10,000 /year).
- Commitment to conduct another community survey to determine the success
and attitudes regarding the deer control program (Summer, 1994).
. t
1
FALL 1991 BLOOMINGTON DEER POPULATION ESTIMATE 1050 Deer
1991-.92 Deer Control Program - Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, DNR and USFWS
Program Program Goal Deer Killed
Bloomington Sharpshooting 150 135
DNR Alternative Deer Control Program 20 14
DNR /USFWS Sharpshooting 30 36
Hennepin County Sharpshooting 150 150
350 TOTAL 335 TOTAL
FALL 1992 BLOOMINGTON DEER POPULATION ESTIMATE 970 Deer
1992 -93 Deer Control Program - Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, DNR and USFWS
Program Program Goal Deer Killed
Bloomington Sharpshooting 175 169
DNR Alternative Deer Control Program 50 -60 50
DNR /USFWS Sharpshooting 25 -30 39
Hennepin County Sharpshooting 150 111
+ 380 TOTAL 369 TOTAL
FALL 1993 BLOOMINGTON DEER POPULATION ESTIMATE 740 Deer
1993 -94 Deer Control Program - Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, DNR and USFWS
Program Program Goal
Bloomington /DNR /USFWS Sharpshooting 150 -200
DNR Alternative Deer Control Program 70 -90
Hennepin County Sharpshooting 125 -150
+ 370 TOTAL
If approximately 175 deer are removed from City owned land in 1993 -94 it is estimated
that removing only 30 -40 per year thereafter would result in a recommended stable
population of approximately 22 deer per square mile of habitat.
Planning \N HR C \Corr \Dee r2.mem
Figure 3
Bloomington Comprehensive Plan
DEER DENSITY TABLE
I RwbadPrcoabmb BbmriVmPWrrtgONWm 7•2-91 I Proposed Deer total to remain In primary and I
Fah. 1991 Wtr_ 1991 Wtr_ 91 -92 Wtr- 91 -92 secondary habitat using cross s.f. land totals
Zone
Notations
aenal deer
estimates
deer
estimate
potential
removal
requesteif:
ieMOVAI :: :: ::
Deer at 40 Deer at 3o Deer at 25
per sq ml per sq mi per sq ml
148
Deer at 20
per sq ml
Deer per long
tarn density
#
(JLV18.1091) (Mg"zOr tq
la
Pifrl ii .:habHit.;ot :Mri:i/.allov :;3etU § �:
126
189
97
90
-
74
lb
Area Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1b
AddiUviial :$9GOt1C1a: •Hafallel :::: :: :: :: :: :: :':::
36
54
18
0
: :G:
18
22
2a
fcjiiiatai�jtAt 'off :frt :tilal�dj : & :bl�i�to:
160
240
168
100
:72 ::
36
45
2b
Area Total
0
0
0
0
0
127
0
0
0
2b
Additidnl :Secoiidi : • :Habifat ::: '' ' ' ' ' ' '
S2
76
so
o
:a::
s
3
Remainder of Urban Area
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4a
eE :of:BlrYjgtori= LiiVJet :9:Mi;:;C 6K.::
50
75
50
40
:..b:.
12
15
4a
Area Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ab
tdaij :Haliitet :iJppar. I: :Creek
0
0
0
0
47
35
2724
23
4b .
......
Area Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
5a
tiabltat :vt :ti len :d= l3usti�aiid; :�: {tQS : : : : : : ::
297
380
269
150
::1:Zi ::
83
69
5b
Area Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6b
i4c (tifGoi'iel :$6o�itl6ty:Hlitiitai: ': : :: ''' : ::
30
45
9
0
48
504 378 315
36
Total
751
1061
671
380
252
297
0 1991 Aerial estimates are based on survey counting 75% of the deer (DNR Standard) ll
0 1991 winter estimate based on 60% of aerial estimate being female with one fawn surviving
to winter. The estimate then subtracts projected car kills, other death source of 10 %.
0 1991 potential removal based on deer estimate minus Interim habitat density selected.
o 1991 requested removal Is proposed goal by City or Agency.
: Shading denotes 1991 -1992 proposed Interim deer density goals by Bloomington Planning.
Dark box denotes proposed long term deer density goal (1994 and beyond)
** Hyland estimate (Zone 5a) Includes an additional out migration for 30% of yearlings.
Deer population density recommendations are shown in black
i
-- d
rr .
1993 -94 Deer Control Program
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! l i i l � I I I i I I i l I I H I I 111111!lIIIIiH IliIIIfillIIII1 1. 111Iitlil[ 1ltilllitlliltlil111111111IfifIfIIIIIIll11 11111IfifI
lIf11111jIi Itl( IIfIpI1lIlii(1111 IIII 1111111 Ilfi[ ti[ II111IIt1 IIlilillllllilliilililllf(Iliil 1 i Iilltl j li I IIIIIIIititittii111fit11IIIIIIIii
1 1 1 ! i t i f 1y 1 ( { 1r t 11 lil !t {,7'i ilil� !II IIIIti III 1 ii
'''� {11 {!I�lI {I {ilil�li {i!l 611!!6!1 {T1ill! { {�1111111111[1� {. I{ 1li���� ,o11E1!il {A111!1!l.:1 {l��i 11[i1D11�1111 {I1t1�111{il{ { I1 1171��117111 ' {11i1771111r1
lliil111111
O
N
CITY OF
BLOOMINGTON
MINNESOTA
x 11, P- --
0[..,,.T Of KftlC MOFM
—S1 D-
-- ..—I
ruDtK Dw Y.D
POOR r.p(.rr
cou[.ou .tt.[ua r.nan
E
i3psr Pnnuiatec
:1 reTsl I-ml I iTi i T:
i N ; C
aths
POP-
ac
Deer
Population
Goal
� ..�.�-
z
2.95
a
FINAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT
OF A
SUBURBAN
DEER
POPULATION
IN THE
CITY
OF NORTH
OARS,
MINNESOTA
FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Peter A. Jordan
Principal Investigator
Ronald A. Moen
Assistant Investigator
Dale L. Krueger
Field Manager.
28 May 1993
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
Summary
2
Deer removal was resumed for the City of North Oaks during the
' winter of 1992 - 1993., 171 were caught in Clover traps and 19 were shot
in an experimental sharpshooting program on the Hill Farm for a total of
190. We estimate that 87 fetuses were carried by the 115 female deer
removed, so the net herd reduction was 277 deer. . This -is the highest
number of deer removed from North Oaks since the deer management program
began in the early 1980's. More deer.would have been removed if weather
conditions this year had been as severe as last year. The cost per deer
removed this year, $131 , was higher than last year. The deer carcasses
were turned over to the Minn. D.N.R. for distibution to food shelves and
other organizations. The 14,200 pounds of carcasses yielded about
12,500 pounds of edible meat. A population model from data collected
indicates this year's control program, in conjunction with other
mortality factors, will result in a fall 1993 deer population of about
880, close to what was present in fall 1992. If the program had not
been carried out, the fall 1993 population would be about 1,150 deer.
We discuss how a combination of trapping and sharpshooting would allow
us to reduce the herd to a fall level of around 500 deer within 2 to 3
years.
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report 3
We carried out a deer removal program for the City of North Oaks
for the winter of 1992 -1993. The objective of the deer - control program
was to carry out a safe and humane herd reduction consistent with the
objectives of the overall deer management program at North Oaks, and to
collect information relevant to research pursued by the University on
this deer herd over the past 18 years.
Weather conditions in the winter of 1992 -1993 were relatively
mild, as compared with past winters. This year we observed only a few
dead or dying deer, unlike 1991 -1992 when many fawns died due to severe
weather in the fall (Snow storms on 31 October and 29 November 1991).
This year traps were first run on 7 December 1992. We set traps from
Sunday to Friday nights through the week of March 15th. The last day of
trapping was 20 March 1993. Sharpshooting was conducted on the Hill
Farm on 12 March, and 22 -25 March 1993.
Trapping Information
We placed traps at 32 sites this year, most of which were within
the residential area on private property. A few other traps, were on
North Oaks Company land immediately adjacent to residential areas, and
on the Hill Farm. Most deer were caught in or adjacent to residential
neighborhoods.
Table 1. Number of traps and number of deer caught in each location.
Trap Location
Number of
traps
Deer
Caught
Hill Farm
5
26
N. Oaks Co.
5
30
Residential
22
115
171
Total 32
We removed 171 deer in the trapping program and 19 in the
experimental sharpshooting program. This is the largest number of deer
removed in a single season since we began deer removal programs at North
Oaks in 1980, •- There were 83 adults, 25 yearlings, and 82 fawns removed.
1993 Nofth Oaks Deer Management Report 4
About 68% of the, yearlings and adults removed were females.
Because fetuses do not become visible until January, we could not
determine pregnancy on does caught in December. Numbers in the bottom
row of Table 2 include an estimated assignment of fetuses to does taken
in December, based on age- specific pregnancy data from the does take in
later months. By this method a total of 87 fetuses was determined, and,
when added to deer removed, gives a total effective removal of 277
animals from the population. This assumes no later loss of fetuses, and
does not account for losses in newborns. On the other hand, it is
conservative in that if doe fawns are bred, it is usually much later
than in other females, so their fetuses might not be accounted for
during January and February. One pregnant fawn was recorded this year.
Table 2. Number of deer in each sex and age - class and number of fetuses
removed in 1992 -93.
Yearling and adult does carried about as many fetuses in 1993 as
in 1992. In 1992, adult does averaged 1.33 fetuses, while this year
they averaged 1.39 fetuses. The number of fetuses in yearling does was
also similar to last year's -- 0.41 vs. 0.42 fetuses in 1992.
Table 3. Sex of fetus and number of fetuses / female for each female
age - class.
Fetus Sex
Fawn
Yearling
Adult
Total
Male
40
8
27
75
Female
42
17
56
115
Total
82
25
83
190
Fetuses:
l
7
71
79
Estimated
Fetuses:
1
8
78
87
Yearling and adult does carried about as many fetuses in 1993 as
in 1992. In 1992, adult does averaged 1.33 fetuses, while this year
they averaged 1.39 fetuses. The number of fetuses in yearling does was
also similar to last year's -- 0.41 vs. 0.42 fetuses in 1992.
Table 3. Sex of fetus and number of fetuses / female for each female
age - class.
Fetus Sex
Fawn
Yearling
Adult
Total
Male
0
2
29
31
Female
1
4
27
32
Unknown
0
1
15
16
'• Total
1
7
71
79
Fetuses /Female
0.02
0.41
1.39
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report 5
Helicopter Count Results
Dale Krueger, Field Manager, counted deer from a Helicopter on 14
January 1993. The count was made the day after a 3" snowfall. Some
snow remained on tree branches, but this idid not pose a serious
hindrance to viewing. Otherwise, flight conditions were good. Dale was
familiar with the North Oaks area, as he had been working on the program
daily for the entire trapping season. The pilot was experienced in
counting deer at parks in the metropolitan area, and Dale has had much
experience with helicopter flying as well.
Individual deer locations were recorded on a map during the count.
A total of 726 deer were seen within the city boundaries. The number of
deer recorded by sector is shown in Appendix 1. Approximately 508 of
the deer were found within the residential areas. However, deer move
between residential and non - residential areas without restriction, so
this.distribution applies only to the day of the count.
Aerial counting is known to provide an under - estimate of deer
numbers. Because of weather conditions and observer experience, we
estimate that no fewer than 90% of the deer present within North Oaks
were seen this year. Therefore, our estimate of the deer population at
North Oaks was about 800 animals on 14 January 1993.
Since 1976, deer numbers have been estimated in North Oaks with an
aerial count almost every year. The reliability of counts vary with
weather conditions, observer and pilot experience, and snow cover. A
best estimate is made each year from the actual count number. These
numbers are not directly comparable because the date of the count varies
among years. Estimates for each year are given in Table 4.
1993 North Oaks Deer-Management Report
Table 4'. Count results and population estimates for each year.
1 within the roads surrounding the Village. These
figures do not include deer already removed during
those years we were shooting, nor do they include
deer removed after the count was made.
2 Deer were removed during these years.
3 No Aerial count was made due to snow conditions.
6
1933 North Oaks Deer Management Report 7
Population modelling estimate
We have created a population model that projects the number of
deer present in North Oaks for next year (Appendix 2). The model
projects a spring 1994 population of 615 animals, which agrees well with
the results of the aerial count (about 620 deer when removals after the
count are considered). This model projects that the deer population
next fall in North Oaks will be about 889, which is approximately the
same as was present in fall 1992. ' Female deer have 1 or 2 fawns each
spring. If the 190 deer had not been trapped and removed during the
1993 winter, and they had not died from other causes, the model predicts
that there would be 1141 deer in North Oaka in Fall 1993.
Figure 1. Estimate of deer population size at North Oaks for years in
which an aerial count was made. Years in which deer were
removed are indicated by crosses, open circles indicate years
in which no deer were removed.
1000
800
600
0
400
Z
200
Population Estimates from Aerial Count
Deer within the City of North Oaks
I------------------------------------------------
o
----------------------- :P ------------ — ---------------
0 -�--
1975
oo+
1980 1985 1990 1995
0 No Removals + Deer Removed
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report 8
Interactions with Residents and the North Oaks Company .
All interactions reported with individual residents by Dale
Krueger, the Field Manager, were positive. He had discussions with
several residents while he was working during the winter. The people
who he talked to were in favor of the deer management program.
Representative comments included:
"Please place several traps on my property ..."
"I've seen a reduction in the deer population in my area."
"When do you take the deer out of the trap? We never hear you."
"I'm glad to hear the meat goes to food shelves and isn't wasted."
We had problems with trap vandalism this year in the Long Marsh,
Burn Site, and Hawk Lane areas. The netting on the traps at Long Marsh
were slashed; and the traps were moved.. The 2 traps at the Burn Site
had their doors let down repeatedly for approximately two weeks, after
which we moved them. A trap at Hawk Lane had a substance sprayed in
front of the door (possibly a deer repellent), and also had some of the
ropes untied that hold the netting to the frame. These incidents were
reported to the Ramsey County Sherr.if's Office.
Distribution of Carcasses
We field- dressed the deer as per the conditions of the collection
permit from the Minn. D.N.R. The carcasses were then turned over to the
D.N.R. for distribution to food shelves and other organizations. The
average live weight of the deer removed was 101 pounds, 10 pounds
greater than last year. The 14,200 pounds of field- dressed carcasses
would have yielded about 12,500 pounds of edible meat.
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
Suggestions for Next Year
91
More deer were trapped in the 1993 winter than have been removed
in any of the previous winters, despite weather that was less severe
than last year. We began the trapping program about one month earlier
than last year, a fact that contributed to the *increased removal. In
addition, we received permission to sharpshoot deer on the Hill Farm
late in the year, shortly before the cessation of trapping. We suggest
very strongly that a sharpshooting program be implemented for the
duration of the removal program next year, for the reasons outlined
below.
It is probably impossible to remove 300 deer from the North Oaks
area if trapping is the only method used. The trapping season in a
winter could run from December to Mid -March (14 weeks). If 300 deer are
to be removed in those 14 weeks, an average of 22 deer must be removed
each week. In the 1993 winter, we averaged only half that rate, 11.4
deer per week, despite having more traps set than ever before.
Our population model shows that is is necessary to remove at least
200 deer for 2 to 3 years if the North Oaks deer population is to be
decreased to levels close to those recommended by the Minn. D.N.F. Four
different scenarios from the population model are presented below, with
annual removals over the next 3 years of 150, 200, 250, or 300 deer per
year. As with any population model, the numbers are not absolute, but
they are probably within 10 to 158 of what could be expected to occur if
conditions do not change. Relative positions of different removal
regimes would not change, in any case.
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report 10
Figure 2. Fall deer population at North Oaks based on our population
model. Effects of removal scenarios of 150, 200, 250, and 300
deer per year for the next 3 winters are shown on the graph.
Effects of actual removals are shown for 1991 - 1993.
1200
1000
L
Q
0 800
600
� 400
z
200
Fall Deer Population
------------------------------------
------ --------
-------------------------------- - - - - -- t--- 1�z----- - - - - --
0 4-
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995 1996
�- 300
250
-� 200
-� 150
Under the present system of trapping, it should be obvious that
trapping alone will not remove enough deer to reduce, and possibly even
maintain, the North Oaks deer herd. An alternative method, which was
used in North Oaks in the early 1980'5 by University of Minnesota
personnel, is sharpshooting. When done in a responsible manner, this
method is no less safe than the trap and shoot method. North Oaks is
not the only Minnesota urban area in which deer are being controlled.
Bloomington, the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge,
Hennepin County Parks, New Ulm, and the Blaine Airport also have reduced
deer populations in recent years via sharpshooting. In addition,
sharpshooting is the only method of control that has been used at the
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
11
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant. As suburbs become more crowded, and
the importance of hunting as a mortality factor for deer herds
decreases, other methods must be used to maintain the deer population
within guidelines recommended by the Minnesota D.N.R.
Results of the experimental sharpshooting program this year show
how it can be used to augment the trapping program already in place. At
the end of the year, when trapping was not effective, we removed 19 deer
in 4 days. These deer were only taken from the Farm area, we would not
consider sharpshooting in the residential area now. Next year, on days
when few (0, 1, or 2) deer are caught in traps, we would use
sharpshooting to increase the average deer removed per week to 20 or
more. This would be less expensive in terms of man -hours and supplies
as well, because the workers are already at North Oaks to run the trap
line in the morning. They have to set up the laboratory equipment for
processing just one deer, so handling the additional carcasses would
increase cost - efficiency. In addition, we would probably not need to
continue the program into the last week of March, as was done this year.
The sharpshooting program would be used as a controlled method to
maintain an even removal of deer from North Oaks over the course of the
winter, when conditions allowed safe and effective removal of additional
deer. While we will only be using sharpshooting on the Farm area, we
know, based on trail usage and observations, that deer move back and
forth between the residential and farm areas.
In summary, there are five primary reasons for using sharpshooting
to augment the trap and shoot method of deer removal:
1. It is not possible to remove 300 deer by trapping alone in a
single winter.
2. The cost per deer removed will be less when both trapping and
sharpshooting are used.
3. Sharpshooting is no loss safe than the trap and shoot method,
when conducted properly.
4. There is public support for sharpshootinq within the city of
North Oaks -- residents were evenly split between using
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
12
sharpshooting and trapping as the removal means in a survey taken
Fall 1991.
5. Sharpshooting is allowed under the deer removal permit granted
to the city of North Oaks by the Minnesota D.N.R.
We can supply additional details regarding the sharpshooting program as
needed, for example, economics, guidelines used, etc. Basically, we
feel that the sharpshooting is necessary to reduce the herd down to
levels suggested by the Minn. D.N.R., and would like to begin use it as
a removal method throughout the course of the contract next year.
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
Appendix 1. 1993 Aerial Count Results.
Sector
1991
1992
1993
lA
18
48
33
1B
oc
48
65
2
101
114
76
3
132
45
101
4
22
70
109
5
67
28
82
6
63
49
69
7
2
9
9
8
19
7
4
9
53
57
51
10
15
33
17
11
83
25
110
Total
669
533
726
13
199; North Oaks Deer Management Report
Appendix 2. Population model
14
We have generated a population model to predict the number of deer
which will be present in North Oaks in the 1993 -94 winter. We used data
from deer trapped at North Oaks from 1991 to 1993, to estimate sex
ratios, age -class distributions, and fecundity data. Assumptions made
while building the model are listed below.
The spring 1992 pre- partum population was estimated to be 672 deer
(see 1992 report from P.A. Jordan to the City of North Oaks). The sex
ratio was assumed to be 57 :43 female:male, based on the deer trapped in
Winter 1992. The age -class distribution in the population, again based
on deer trapped in Winter 1992, was 44% adults, 388 yearlings, and 188
fawns. The number of fawns per doe, collected from each female deer
trapped, was 1.33 fawns per adult doe, and 0.42 fawns per yearling doe.
Only one fawn was pregnant, so we did not consider fawns produced by
fawns in the model. This may result in a small underestimate (1.or 2
deer) of the fall population. We estimated survivorship during the
summer to be 958 for adults and yearlings, and 858 for fawns.
The estimated deer population in Fall 1992, based on the above
inputs, was 878 animals. The sex and age -class structure of the fall
population is given below:
190 deer were removed by trapping or sharpshooting during the
1992 -1993 winter. The sex and age -class distribution of those deer are
given in the following table:
Female
Male
Total
Adults
316
220
537
Yearlings
54
54
108
Fawns
117
117
233
Total
487
391
878
190 deer were removed by trapping or sharpshooting during the
1992 -1993 winter. The sex and age -class distribution of those deer are
given in the following table:
Some deer died due to other causes, such as starvation, road-
kills, poaching, etc. during the 3992 -1993 winter, although the numbers
that died were undoubtedly less than in the 1991 -1992 winter. We
estimated an overall mortality rate for adults as 5.08, for yearlings as
10.08 (weighted toward male mortality), and for fawns as 158. The sex
and age -class distribution of deer which died during the winter, given
the mortality rates above, are given in the following table:
Female
Male
Total
Adults
56
27
83
Yearlings
17
8
25
Fawns
42
40
82
Some deer died due to other causes, such as starvation, road-
kills, poaching, etc. during the 3992 -1993 winter, although the numbers
that died were undoubtedly less than in the 1991 -1992 winter. We
estimated an overall mortality rate for adults as 5.08, for yearlings as
10.08 (weighted toward male mortality), and for fawns as 158. The sex
and age -class distribution of deer which died during the winter, given
the mortality rates above, are given in the following table:
Female
Male
Total
Adults
13
13
26,
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report 15
Yearlings
3
8
11
Fawns
18
18
36
When the deer removed by trapping and the estimated mortality due
to other causes are subtracted from the fall population, an estimate of
the 1993 pre - partum spring population can be made. The sex and age -
class distribution of those deer are given in the following table:
The pre - partum population, in addition to estimates of fawns per
female from animals trapped during the 1993 winter, allow us to project
the population present in the fall of 1993. In the 1993 winter trapped
adult does carried about 1.39 fetuses per doe, and yearling does that
were trapped had 0.41 fetuses per doe. As in summer 1992, we estimated
summer survivorship at 958 for yearlings and adults, and 854 for fawns.
The projected fall 1993 population, based on the above assumptions, is
889 deer. The sex and age -class distribution of those deer are given in
the following table:
Female
Male
Total
Adults
247
180
428
Yearlings
34
38
72
Fawns
57
59
115
Total
1 338
L 277
615
The pre - partum population, in addition to estimates of fawns per
female from animals trapped during the 1993 winter, allow us to project
the population present in the fall of 1993. In the 1993 winter trapped
adult does carried about 1.39 fetuses per doe, and yearling does that
were trapped had 0.41 fetuses per doe. As in summer 1992, we estimated
summer survivorship at 958 for yearlings and adults, and 854 for fawns.
The projected fall 1993 population, based on the above assumptions, is
889 deer. The sex and age -class distribution of those deer are given in
the following table:
As with any model, there are a number of additional assumptions that
must be made because parameters are not known. If any of these
assumptions are violated, then model predictions will be incorrect. The
degree to which model predictions are incorrect will depend on how
sensitive the model is to the assumption that is violated. Some of
these additional assumptions are:
1. Age -class distribution of trapped animals is representative
of the population.
2. Sex -ratio of trapped animals is representative of the
population.
3. The sex - ratio of fawns born will be 50:50.
4. There is no prenatal mortality of fetuses.
6. No immigration to or emigration from the population will
occur.
Female
Male
Total
Adults
267
208
475
Yearlings
54
56
110
Fawns
152
152
304
Total
473
415
889
As with any model, there are a number of additional assumptions that
must be made because parameters are not known. If any of these
assumptions are violated, then model predictions will be incorrect. The
degree to which model predictions are incorrect will depend on how
sensitive the model is to the assumption that is violated. Some of
these additional assumptions are:
1. Age -class distribution of trapped animals is representative
of the population.
2. Sex -ratio of trapped animals is representative of the
population.
3. The sex - ratio of fawns born will be 50:50.
4. There is no prenatal mortality of fetuses.
6. No immigration to or emigration from the population will
occur.
1993 North Oaks Deer Management Report
Appendix 3. 1990 -1991 Deer Aging
16
Incisor teeth were collected from each deer trapped in 1990 -1991
and 1991 -1992 and sent to Mattson's, Inc. (Box 308, Milltown, MT 59851)
for aging. The 1992 data are given in this year's report because of a
delay in processing time. The actual age class distribution is given
below.. Note that this does not represent the age -class distribution of
deer at North Oaks, we have.not trapped enough animals to give a smooth
age class distribution.
Age
1991
1992
0
61
107
1
22
31
2
3
17
3
7
5
4
3
8
5
0
3
6
0
1
7
2
4
8
1
0
9
1
1
10
1.
0
11
0
2
12
1
1
13
1
0
14+
0
3
Total
1103
183
17 deer could not be aged in 1991
Movement and Mortality Patterns of Resident and Translocated
Suburban White - tailed Deer
BEVERLY K. BRYANT. Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 413, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee,
Milwaukee, VIII 53201
WILLIAM ISHMAEL, Bureau of Wildlife Management, Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison,
WI 53707 -7921
INTRODUCTION
During the past decade, the white- tailed deer (Odo-
coileus virginianus) has become North America's most
delightful and controversial species of urban wildlife.
Expanding human communities and the deer's adaptable
nature have led to urban deer populations in cities through-
out the eastern and midwestern United States (Shoesmith
and Koonz 1977, Ashley 1982, Decker and Gavin 1987,
Sillings 1987, Witham and Jones 1987, Ishmael 1989). Low
to moderate deer densities are viewed positively by residents
because of the white- tail's high aesthetic value (Decker and
Gavin 1987). However, when deer - vehicle collisions and
damage to gardens and natural vegetation increase, residents
turn to wildlife managers to solve the "urban deer problem"
(Ishmael 1989).
Management of an urban deer herd is a complex issue,
often made more difficult by public reaction to proposed
management options (Witham and Jones 1987). Control
techniques are rarely implemented before the herd size has
grown to damaging levels and the controversy that surrounds
urban deer management further delays action (Ishmael
1989). The first management techniques suggested are usu-
ally public hunting or shooting by marksmen, but, because
of safety concerns and public sentiment against killing deer,
these techniques are often not implemented (Diehl 1988).
As an alternative, many communities turn to live capture
and translocation as a humane, publicly acceptable method
of reducing the size of their urban deer herd (O'Bryan and
McCullough 1985, Witham and Jones 1987, Diehl 1988).
White - tailed deer are abundant in the Milwaukee met-
ropolitan area and herd management has become a hotly
debated issue in many local communities. One suburb, the
Village of River Hills, has experienced a steady increase in
deer numbers during the past 10 years and has attracted
considerable media attention—because—of its efforts to control
herd size. Like other communities, River Hills strongly con-
sidered a shooting program but public opinion and legal
concerns led to initiation of a trapping and translocation
program in 1987 -1988. In 1989, a research program was
begun by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, and the Village of
River Hills to evaluate the success of the translocation
.program by monitoring the resident deer population and
following the movements and survival of deer removed from
the Village. This paper presents data collected during 1.5
years of monitoring radio- tagged and ear - tagged deer.
STUDY AREA
The Village of River Hills (43° 10'N; 88° 56' W) is a
14.3 -km2 community of estate size properties located in
northern Milwaukee County. Seventy-five percent of River
Hills is zoned for a 2 -ha minimum lot size and larger lots are
common. Natural vegetation covers at least half of most
properties, offering deer ample cover and food. In addition,
many residents stock deer feeders throughout the year.
Deer were translocated to four different state managed
wildlife areas in southeastern Wisconsin (Fig. 1). These
areas were considered good deer habitat and supported deer
densities of between 5.8 -7.7 deer/km2 prior to release of
translocated animals. Hunting pressure was heavy on all
four of the areas.
METHODS
Trapping and Translocation
Live trapping was conducted by River Hills Depart-
ment of Public Works employees from December —March
1987 -1988, 1988 -1989, and 1989 -1990. Deer were cap-
tured in modified Stephenson traps baited with com and
Wildlife Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. NIUW Svmp. Set. 2, L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedv, eds. Published by Nail. Inst. for Urban Wildl., 10921 Trotting Ridge Way,
Columbia. MD 21044, USA. 1991.
54 Ecology of Urban Wildlife
tCAU
Fig. 1. Map of study area. Numbers refer to distances (in kilometers)
between deer capture andrelease sites. A = Kettle Morraine, B = Theresa
Marsh, C = Allentown Marsh, D = Jackson Marsh. Scale is in kilometers.
apples and transferred to travel crates for transport to a
release site. Sex and approximate age were recorded (Table
1) and each deer was marked with a colored numbered ear -
tag. Data on mortality and movements of ear - tagged deer
were obtained from tag returns.
Radio- Telemetry
To supplement tag return data, 12 of the 121 translo-
cated deer in 1989 (4 male, 8 female) and 13 of the 120
translocated deer in 1990 (6 male, 7 female) were fitted
with solar - powered ear -tag transmitters (Telemetry Sys-
tems, Mequon, Wis.) or battery - powered radio - collars
(Advanced Telemetry Systems, Bethel, Minn.). In addi-
tion, 12 River Hills deer (6 male, 6 female) were tranqua
lized with succinylcholine chloride (Anectine brand) using
a dart gun, radio- tagged, and re- released at the point of
capture. All deer were monitored for at least a year after
tagging to evaluate survival and movements. Deer were
tracked from a vehicle, airplane, or on foot bi- weekly (for
resident deer) or monthly (for translocated deer). Telemetry
locations, were determined by triangulation or by sighting
the animal.
Data Analysis
Travel distances for translocated deer were calculated
as the maximum straight line distance from release site to
Table 1. Live trapped and translocated white: tailed deer in River
Hills, Wisconsin, 1987- 1990.'
Deer captured
Male Female
No. of
Year traps Fawn Adult Fawn Adult Total
1987 -1988 4 9 6 11 18 44
1988 -1989 10 35 6 31 49 121
1989 -1990 20 39 17 26 38 120
Total - 83 29 68 105 285
-Source: K. Fredrickson, 1987 -1990, Unpubl. reports to Wis. Dep. of Nat. Resour.
point of death or location of permanent range. Movements
of resident deer were measured as the maximum observed
distances from the location of capture. Minimum convex
polygon home ranges were calculated for resident deer with
the program MCPAAL (Smithsonian Institution, Washing-
ton, D.C.). A two sample t -test was used to compare the
movements of resident and translocated deer, movements
of males and females, and the numbers of days resident and
translocated deer remained alive. Mortality rates of native
deer were calculated from records of hunter and road kills
for the deer management units encompassing the release
sites. Mortality rates were compared using Chi - square anal-
ysis. Survivorship curves were determined using the methoc
outlined by Pollock et al. (1989).
RESULTS
Movements of Translocated Deer
Translocated deer tended to stay near the release areas
although there was large variation between individual
(x =16.08 km, range = 0.53 -67.0, n = 58). Fifty -six per
cent of the 58 ear- tagged deer that died in 1989 did s
within 8 km of their release points. However, 26% of th
deer traveled over 24 km and as many as five deer travele
as far as 50-60 km. Radioed animals exhibited a simil:
range of movements (0.91 -32.4 km, n =12) (Table 2'
There was no significant difference between males an
females for either the ear - tagged (t =1.32, P >0.19) t
radio- tagged sample (t= 0.552, P >0.59).
Translocated deer showed little tendency to hom,
Only one animal is known to have returned to River Hill
This individual was an adult female that traveled from tl-
Kettle Morraine release site .(44 km) in a maximum of 2,
days.
Movement Patterns of Radio - tagged Deer.- Movemen
of radio- tagged deer showed strong seasonal influence. P
radio- tagged deer (n =12) released in mid - January to ear
March 1989 remained within 3.2 km of their release si
during the first month after release. In fact, these de
remained within 8 km of the release point until April -Mz
By this time, three animals had died, three remained with
Table 2 J . Average distances (km) traveled by translocated and resi en
deer, 1988 -1989.
Distance traveled (km)
Deer
Sex
n
:
SE
Range
Translocated
Radio tagged
8
101.39
_
Female
4.0
0.91 -3:
Combined
12
10.98
3.1
0.91 -3:
Ear- tagged
Male
28
18.80
4.1
0.94 -61
Female
30
12.31
1.9
0.53 -41
Combined
58
16.08
2.4
0.53 -6
Resident
Radio tagged
Male
6
1.93
0.64
0.75 -4.
Female
5
0.62
0.19
0.34 -1.
Combined
11
1.34
1.3
0.34 -4.
8 km of the release site, and six animals had dispersed away
from the area. Five of the dispersing deer had established
stable ranges by June. One adult doe continued to move
throughout the summer, but settled in an area 22.6 km from
her release point by late August. Deer that survived the first
1.5 years after release are still occupying the same range
they established in May 1989.
Location of New Home Ranges. — Of the nine deer
radio- tagged in 1989 that survived over 2 months, six estab-
lished home ranges in or within 1.6 km of a residential or
developed area. Five animals established home ranges in low
density residential -farmland areas adjacent to small towns
( <24,000 pop.). One juvenile doe (B2038) settled within
a resort community along Lake Michigan where she lives in
residents' yards. Of the 1990 sample, two does are known
to have established home ranges within developed areas.
One adult doe occupies a range within the same resort
community as B2038. The other deer was living in a city
park until she was killed by a car.
Movements of Deer
Radio- tagged translocated deer moved significantly
greater distances away from the point of release than did
resident deer (t =3.11, P<.01) (Table 2). The mean dis-
tance moved for radioed translocated deer was 10.98 km
(0.91 -32:4) versus 1.34 km (0.34 -4.2) for resident deer.
Only 10 resident deer had sufficient data to calculate home
range size due to mortality (1), and transmitter failure M.
All 10 deer had stable home ranges during the year of
monitoring. Mean home range size for females was 0.413
km- (0.17 -0.75 km') and 2.66 km' (0.90 -4.8 km') for
males.
Mortality Rates
Translocated deer experienced high mortality. Ten of
the radio- tagged deer (83%) were dead within an average
of 185 (2 -321) days after release. Ear -tag returns revealed
42% mortality, significantly (XZ =6.78, P< 0.01) lower
than that estimated by telemetry. It is likely that tag returns
underestimate mortality due to the potentially large number
of unreported hunter kills, and animals that die from capture
stress and vehicle collisions that are never found.
Mortality rates of radio- tagged translocated deer were
greater than those for deer native to the release areas. Based
on car kill reports and hunter harvest, native deer in these
areas were estimated to have 59% mortality in 1989.
Deer that remained in River Hills lived significantly
longer (t = 3.6, P< 0.005) than animals removed from the
Village (Fig.2). Resident deer survived a mean of 448
(81 -513) days after capture, with a 17% mortality rate.
Translocated deer showed significant mortality within the
first 3 months following release.. In addition, survivorship
dropped sharply due to hunting pressure in November (Fig.
2). Resident deer, on the other hand, exhibited a more
uniform curve indicative of the low mortality rate, including
the lack of hunting.
SUBURBAN WHITE - TAILED DEER • B
1.0
0.e
00.(
0
z 0.4
V)
0.;
0.1
nt and Ishmael 55
1 Z J 4 J V � � � �`- •• •�
Month
Fig. 2. Survivorship of resident (A) and translocated (0) suburban white -
tailed deer, southeastern Wisconsin, 1989.
Cause of Death
Sources of mortality for translocated deer were vehicle
collisions, hunters, stress and injury due to trapping, and
unknown causes. The percentage of translocated deer dying
from vehicles and hunters was similar to that of deer native
to the release areas in 1989 (Fig. 3). The higher mortality
rate for translocated deer would therefore appear to be due
to deaths caused by translocation. During the 3 years of
trapping, eight deer died or were euthanized because of
injuries sustained while in the trap. In addition, at least five
died from capture- related stress soon after release. Animals
that died within a week of release and had no other apparent
injuries were classified as victims of capture - related stress.
This figure is undoubtedly an underestimate due to the
number of deer that die within a week of release and are
found months later, when cause of death cannot be deter-
mined, or are never found at all. It is likely, therefore, that
the 20% trap - related mortality reported for radio- tagged
deer is a more accurate estimate than the 4% based on ear -
tag returns.
The only source of mortality for resident deer that
could be assessed was vehicles. In recent years, some 35 deer
have died a year on River Hills roads. Figure 4 shows the
percentage of the annual roadkills that occurred each month
in 1989 for River Hills and translocated deer, based on
Village police records and ear -tag returns. In 1989, the peak
in Village road kills occurred in November. This corres-
ponds to increased deer movements during the seasonal rut.
Translocated deer suffered equal mortality to cars in January
and November, and also had peaks in April and May,
although differences between the two populations were not
significant. These peaks correspond with the peaks in move-
ment noted for radio- tagged deer.
DISCUSSION
. Live - trapping and translocation has been successful in
controlling herd size in River Hills. Annual aerial censuses
made in 4 of the past 5 years (Table 3) indicated that the
56 Ecology of Urban Wildlife
(70
A) RADIO- TAGGED TRANSLOCATED DEER IN-101
HUNTERS (72X)
® TRAP STRESS
VEHICLES
UNKNOWN
(58%x)
8) EAR - TAGGED TRANSLOCATEO BEER IN -501
C) NATIVE DEER IN-52141
Fig. 3. Sources of mortality for translocated and native deer, southeastern Wisconsin, 1989.
40
35
30
D 25
20
v
0 15
Of
ifC 1 c
C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n 'L
Month
Fig. 4. Percent of annual vehicle- caused mortality by month for River
Hills resident (solid bars) and translocated (open bars) deer, southeastem
Wisconsin. 1989.
(28x)
Table 3. Aerial censuses of deer and pre - fawning population sizes, River
Hills, Wisconsin, 1986 -1990.
C
Year
ensus 1989' 1999
technique 1986 1988'
Aerial count 159 227 248 171
Pre- fawnine' 159 216 159 128
'Trapping year.
'Pre- fawning figures represent the population sire in April and were calculated by
subtracting the number of deer translucated and roadkilled from the winter aerial
counts.
deer population has decreased during the 3 years of trapping,
although such counts yield only minimum population figures
(Witham and ]ones 1990a). Despite this success, the popu-
lation remains well above the recommended size of 100 deer
(6 -8 deerfkm') and road kills have increased annually. The
cost of removing deer from River Hills has increased each
year from $17,600 in 19874988 to $32,760 in 1990. The
Ever
1990'
171
128
red by
aerial
,)tng,
gures
,opu-
deer
The
1 each
The
price per deer removed, however, has dropped from $400
to $273.
Live - trapping; and translocation is advocated in many
communities despite its costs because residents feel that
removal is in the best interest of the animals (Diehl 1988).
However, our results, and those of other studies, indicate
that translocated deer do not lead idealized lives (Hawkins
and Montgomery 1969, O'Bryan and McCullough 1985,
Witham and Jones 1990b). Translocated deer have signifi-
cantly lower survival than their resident suburban counter-
parts and it appears that they are more susceptible to mortal-
ity sources than deer bom in a non -urban environment.
Suburban deer are habituated to people and, when trans-
planted to rural areas, fail to react adequately to the threat
of hunting and feral dogs (O'Bryan and McCullough 1985).
The process of capture, transport, and release into an unfam-
ilar area is stressful to deer. Frightened animals occasionally
try to force their way out of the trap and injure themselves
severely. This can be minimized by frequent trap checks and
prompt release, however, little can be done to eliminate the
stress an animal experiences after being introduced into an
unfamiliar landscape.
White - tailed deer are social animals, living in small
family or bachelor groups, and utilizing the same home
range throughout most of their lives (Marchinton and Hirth
1984). Translocating deer removes them from both their
familiar habitat and social groups. Once they are released,
animals must establish a new range and integrate into the
existing herd. This may be particularly difficult for young,
inexperienced animals. The major victims of trap - related
stress in our radio - tagged sample were fawns.
White - tailed deer generally have small home ranges
and most live out their lives within 2.6 km of the area they
were born (Ishmael 1989). In the present study,, movements
and home range sizes of resident deer were typical of south-
eastern Wisconsin deer (Larson et al. 1978). Translocated
deer, on the other hand, moved relatively long distances
from their release areas. It is still unclear why some translo-
cated animals remained within a kilometer of the release
area, while others ranged as far as 67 km. Variability in
movement may be related to an individual's success at estab-
lishing a new range. Radio - tagged deer that moved signifi-
cant distances away from the release sites did so in April
and May. This is a period when juvenile and subordinate
animals are driven away by females that are securing areas
for fawning (Marchinton and Hirth 1984). This increase in
aggression between deer, along with the newly available
forage, probably triggers deer movements and they continue
to travel until they find an acceptable new range.
Although translocated deer did not "home" back to
River Hills (with one exception), some did settle in familiar
suburban habitats, and most retained their urban habits.
We do not know whether these deer preferred this kind of
habitat over less developed areas. It-is clear, however, that
many translocated deer continued the habits that made
them nuisance animals in River Hills. There have been
SUBURBAN WHITE- TAILED DEER • Bryant and Ishmael 57
numerous reports from residents throughout the release areas
of tagged deer browsing shrubs and gardens, eating at bird
feeders, and causing traffic hazards. One radio- collared doe
has caused so much damage to gardens near the Kettle
Morraine release area that the local game warden has
requested to shoot her.
High mortality rates of translocated deer, combined
with the manner in which many of these animals die, make
it difficult to justify translocation as a humane altemative
to harvest methods. Further, our data indicate that, by
translocating suburban deer, nuisance animal problems are
being created in other communities. As the number of
communities with urban herds continues to grow, transloca-
tion will become a less viable option. Many states already
prohibit the release of deer onto public land because deer
populations are currently at desired capacity. Wildlife man-
agers, together with local officials and citizens, must begin
to address the issue of herd control using a multi - faceted
approach, including culling programs as well as education
on damage control techniques.
Acknowledgments. — Funding for telemetry equipment
and radio - tracking time and travel was provided by White-
tails Unlimited, Inc. and the Safari Club International.
Phillip Dom assisted in tagging animals and did the early
telemetry work. Many thanks go to Kurt Fredrickson, the
River Hills Department of Public Works, and the River
Hills Police Department for providing support and sharing
their files. R. Selvakumar prepared the figures and provided
invaluable comments. Charles M. Weise provided key
insights throughout the project.
REFERENCES CITED
Ashley, R.F. 1982. Milwaukee's dear deer. Wis. Nat. Resour.
6:6 -11.
Decker, D.J., and T.A. Gavin. 1987. Public attitudes toward a
suburban deer herd. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 15:173 -180.
Diehl, S.R. 1988. Selective removal as an alternative in deer
management. Pages 1 -10 in L. Nielson and R.D. Brown, eds.
Translocation of wild animals. Wis. Humane Soc., Mil-
waukee.
Hawkins, R.E., and G.G. Montgomery. 1969. Movements of
translocated deer as determined by telemetry. J. Wildl. Man-
age. 33:196 -203.
Ishmael, W. 1989. In a rut. Wis. Nat. Resour. 10:22 -28.
Larson, T.J., O.J. Rongstad, and F.W. Terbilcox. 1978. Move-
ment and habitat use of white - tailed deer in southcentral
Wisconsin. J. Wildl. Manage. 42:113 -117.
Marchinton, R.L., and D.H. Hirth. 1984. Behavior. Pages
129 -168 in L.K. Halls, ed. White - tailed deer: ecology and
management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pa.
O'Bryan, M.K., and D.R. McCullough. 1985. Survival of black-
tailed deer following relocation in California. J. Wildl. Man-
age. 49:115 -119.
Pollock, K.H., S. Winterstein, C.M. Bunick, and P. Curtis. 1989.
Survival analysis in telemetry studies: the staggered entry
design. J. Wildl. Manage. 53:7 =15.
Shoesmith, M. W., and W. H. Koonz. 1977.. The maintenance of
58 Ecology Of-Urban Wildlife
an urban deer herd in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Trans. North
Am. Wildl. and Nat. Resour. Conf. 42:278 -285•
Sillings, J.L. 1987. White- tailed deer studies in a suburban com-
munity: ground counts, impacts on natural vegetation, and
electric fencing to control browsing. M.Sc. Thesis, The
Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul. 84 pp•
Witham, J.H., and J.M. Jones. 1987. Deer-
and research in the Chicago metropolitan area. Pages
155 -159 in L.W.,Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds. Integrating
man and nature in the metropolitan environment. Natl. Inst.
for Urban Wildl., Columbia, Md.
- tailed deer abundance on
and 1990a. White
metropolitan forest preserves during winter in northeastern
Illinois. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:13 -16.
and . 1990b. Post•translocation survival and
movements of metropolitan white - tailed deer. Wildl. Soc.
Bull. 18:434 -44.1.
individuals with a CD4+ T- lymphocyte
count of <200 /µL in the absence of
other AIDS - indicator diseases. Addi-
tionally, pulmonary tuberculosis,
recurrent pneumonia, and cervical
cancer were added as AIDS - indicator
diseases. As of March 15, 1993.237
(16 %) of the 1,521 AIDS cases diag-
nosed and reported through 1992 met
only the 1993 case definition at the time
of the initial AIDS diagnosis (Table 5).
Of the 320 cases for 1992, 117 (37 %)
met the 1993 case definition only.
Additional cases meeting only the 1993
definition are expected to be added in
future months.
Lyme Disease
The MDH has conducted surveillance
for Lyme disease since 1982. Through-
out this period, the surveillance case
definition of Lyme disease has been
based on the diagnosis of erythema
migrans. From 1983 through 1992, 915
cases of Lyme disease were reported in
Minnesota. Of these, 481 (53 %) were
residents of the Twin Cities metropolitan
area; however, most ( >67 %) of these
infections were likely acquired in
Wisconsin or in counties north of the
Twin Cities, including Aitkin, Carlton,
Cass, Chisago, Crow Wing, Isanti,
Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison and Pine
counties. These 10 counties also have
the highest reported incidence of Lyme
disease among their residents and
comprise the primary endemic area for
Lyme disease in Minnesota.
During 1992, 196 cases of Lyme
disease were reported. Most (194) of
the 196 confirmed cases had physician -
diagnosed EM with individual lesions Z
5 cm. The other two cases were
confirmed through antibody testing for
Bonelia burgdorferi at CDC. The 196
Table 4. Cases of AIDS by Race /Ethnicity and
Year of Diagnosis, Minnesota 1982 -1992
Race/
Pre -1991
1991
1992
Ethnicity
No. ( %)
No. ( °k)
No. ( %)
White
769 (85)
231 (78j
256 (80)
Black
94 (10)
41 (14)
39 (12)
Hispanic
32 ( 4)
19 ( 6)
19 ( 6)
Asian
4 ( <1)
0 ( 0)
1 (<I)
American Indian 7 ( 1)
4 ( 1)
5 ( 2)
Total
906 (100)
295 (100)
320 (100)
confirmed cases identified in 1992
represent a 139% increase from 1991.
Approximately two- thirds of this
increase can be attributed to additional
case finding activities conducted by'
MDH.
Of the 196 confirmed cases for 1992,
106 occurred in residents of the Twin
Cities metropolitan area, 72 occurred in
residents of the 10- county endemic
area in East - central Minnesota, and 18
cases resided in 11 other counties
throughout the state. In 1992, the
incidence among residents of the 10
counties in the primary endemic area
ranged from 96.6 cases per 100,000
residents in Aitkin county to 13.5 per
100,000 in Morrison County. One
hundred eighteen (60 %) cases were
males. The median age of cases was
40 years (range, one to 85 years). One
hundred eighty-four (94 %) had onset
from May through September.
During 1991 and 1992, MDH conducted
limited active surveillance for Lyme
disease in the Twin Cities metropolitan
area. During these two years. 161
Table S. Cases of AIDS by Case Definition Status,
Minnesota 1982 -1992
Case Definition
Pre -1987 8 1987 Case Definition
1993 Case Definition Only:
CD4 count 5200
Pulmonary TB
Cervical Cancer
Recurrent Pneumonia
Total
Pre -1991 1991 1992
No. % No. % No. %
851 (94) 230 (78) 203 (63)
54 ( 6) 65 (22) 117 (37)
1 (<1) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0)
0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0)
0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0)
906 (100) 295 (100) 320 (100)
page 42
cases of Lyme disease were reported
among residents of the Twin Cities
area. However, most of these cases
reported tick exposures outside of the
metropolitan area; only 35 (22 %) had
likely exposures locally. Most (63 %) of
these exposures occurred in Anoka and
Washington counties. These counties
are contiguous with the primary
endemic areas for Lyme disease in
Minnesota and Wisconsin. The results
of 10 years of passive surveillance and
two years of limited active surveillance
in the Twin Cities area confirm that the
risk for acquiring Lyme disease in most
areas of the Twin Cities is very low (less
than one per 100,000 population per
year), particularly in the southern and
western suburbs.
This epidemiologic assessment of the
risk of Lyme disease transmission in the
Twin Cities has been supported by
results of tick surveys conducted in the
seven -county metropolitan area by the
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
(MMCD) from 1990 through 1992. In
the MMCD tick survey, 100 sites were
repeatedly sampled during two or three
years. During this period, Ixodes
scapularis (formerly known as 1.
dammini) were collected almost
exclusively in Anoka. Washington and
northern Ramsey counties. Ixodes ticks
were found at only a few scattered sites
in other counties. Ixodes ticks found
south and west of the Mississippi River
appear to indicate the presence of
isolated small populations (Figure 4).
These locations will be sampled by
MMCD in the future to evaluate long-
term changes in the local deer tick
distribution.
continued...
Measles
In 1992,12 confirmed cases of measles
were reported to MDH. Cases ranged
in age from eight months to 41 years.
Six cases (50%) occurred in adults
ages 18 or older. Of the 10 cases who
were age - eligible for vaccination (i.e.,
15 months to 35 years of age), seven
(70 %) reported having been appropri-
ately vaccinated. Six (50 %) of the 1992
cases were imported; migrant workers
recently arriving from Texas accounted
for these cases. The majority of cases
(10, 83 %) occurred in greater Minne-
sota. This is a shift from recent years
during which the majority of cases
occurred in the metropolitan area, and
can be attributed to measles cases in
migrant workers entering Minnesota to
work in rural areas.
Two cases were employed in medical
settings and acquired measles as a
result of occupational exposure. One
was a laboratory technician who did not
have documentation of two doses of
measles vaccine, as is currently
recommended for health -care workers.
This worker transmitted measles to two
other persons. The other case worked
in a medical records department and
was exposed to a case of measles who
was discussing financial matters.
The settings where measles transmis-
sion occurred this year each highlight
populations for which immunization
issues need to be addressed. While
preschool immunization clearly remains
the highest public health priority,
ensuring adequate adult protection
cannot be overlooked, especially for
persons working in health -care- related
fields. The influx of migrant workers
from measles- endemic areas to
previously isolated rural settings has
resulted in an increase in measles
occurrence and transmission in these
page 43
locations. Heightened surveillance for
measles disease and case isolation
during months of increased migrant
travel, as well as immunization of both
rural and migrant populations, will
reduce future disease transmission in
these areas.
Mumps
Twenty -six cases of mumps were
reported during 1992. Seventeen
cases (65 %) were laboratory- confirmed
and nine (35 %) were confirmed based
on an epidemiologic link to another
case. Fourteen cases (54 %) resided in
the Twin Cities metropolitan area; eight
cases (31 %) occurred in Hennepin
county residents. Cases ranged in age
from less than one to 39 years.
Twenty -three (89 %) were age - eligible
for vaccination; 18 of these had
evidence of appropriate immunization.
The five cases without evidence of
appropriate immunization ranged in
age from 22 to 34 years.
Thirteen (50 %) of the cases were
epidemiologically linked to another
case. Twelve of these cases were
college students. Clusters of cases
occurred in association with three
different post- secondary schools.
Seven cases were related to transmis-
sion in one university, three cases
occurred at another, and two cases
were roommates at the University of
Minnesota with no temporal relationship
to the other two clusters. The remain-
ing 13 cases were sporadic, and
without known epidemiologic link.
The majority of mumps cases in 1992
were adults. Sixteen (62 %) were 18
years of age or older. Of the 12 males
who were 18 years or older, two (17 %)
presented with orchitis. Mumps cases
have historically been seen in school -
aged children. This past year reflects a
continuation in the shift in mumps
epidemiology, toward increasing
numbers of cases in adults and
adolescents.
Because of the difficulty in distinguish-
ing infectious parotitis (mumps) from
other forms of parotitis, mumps - specific
serologic testing is recommended for all
sporadic cases.
Pertussis
One hundred forty -one cases of
pertussis were reported in 1992 (either
continued...
PROBLEM 11DENTIRCATION
o PUBLIC HEALTH/LYME DISEASE
o PLANT/LANDSCAPE DAMAGE
o TRAFFIC SAFETY/PERSONAL SAFETY
o DEER POPULATION HEALTH
POPULATION GROWTH/
CARRYING CAPACITY
1993
POPULATION
1994
POPULATION FORECAST
AVAILABLE HABITAT
RECOMMENDED DENSITY
RECOMMENDED
POPULATION
100 + DEER
130 -140 DEER
ABOUT 2
SQUARE MILES
15 - 25 DEER/
SQUARE MILE
40 -50 DEER
POPULATION
REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
o HUNTING
o REINTRODUCTION OF PREDATORS
o TRAPPING AND TRANSLOCATING ,
o BIRTH CONTROL
o ALLOW NATURE TO TAKE ITS COURSE
o SHARPSHOOTING
o TRAP AND KILL
CONCLUSIONS
o EDINA'S DEER POPULATION IS PART OF A
LARGER POPULATION
o APPROXIMATELY TWO SQUARE MILES OF
HABITAT IN EDINA
o EDINA HABITAT CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING
30 - 50 DEER
o CURRENT POPULATION IS 100 + DEER
0 60 + DEER MUST BE REMOVED ANNUALLY
FOR THREE YEARS TO REACH A
POPULATION OF 40 - 50 DEER
o ONLY FEASIBLE METHODS OF POPULATION
REDUCTION INVOLVE DEATH OF
INDIVIDUAL ANIMALS
o POPULATION COULD BE REDUCED
THROUGH SHARPSHOOTING IN BRAEMAR
PARK AND TRAP AND KILL IN OTHER
LOCATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
THREE YEAR POPULATION REDUCTION
PROGRAM:
- POPULATION OBJECTIVE - 40 -50 DEER
- 60 + DEER REMOVED EACH WINTER
- INITIAL GOAL - 50 DEER REMOVED THIS
WINTER
- SHARPSHOOTING AND TRAP/KILL
DEER FEEDING PROHIBITION
DEER/VEHICULAR ACCIDENT REPORTING
AERIAL SURVEYS
DEER COMPLAINT REPORTING
SURVEY RESULTS
o SURVEY INCLUDED IN SPRING 1993
ABOUT TOWN
0 294 SURVEYS RETURNED
1.4% Response Rate
4% in Southwest Quadrant
o 52% REPORT DEER OVERPOPULATION IN
THEIR AREA
- 70% in Southwest Quadrant
o 59% BELIEVED DEER WERE A COMMUNITY
ASSET
o 36% BELIEVED DEER WERE ONLY A
LIABILITY
o 33% OPPOSED DEER POPULATION
CONTROL RESULTING IN DEATH OF
ANIMALS
o 53% SUPPORTED POPULATION CONTROL
RESULTING IN DEATH OF ANIMALS
o 59% SUPPORTED USE OF TAXES FOR DEER
MANAGEMENT
EDINA DEER HABITAT — 1993
- - —. rrcaaccacRic�- rs
1 - W, �
IN SAO; lip M11.9 111; 5
1
♦` I � — \ � I,j+ ulllllli II IIII U "�, 1;
t �
ig
mn
- �� - -= s= = =,_ins �i•�
N
Z�� It 1.01 unL ::. : • _= . %� _— yp 1
I 11�lots
/r ... I /'.y, atria I� H _ ryu
111 ■ 111■ 11-1 11i1 I I' . .. • .� _- 11
"•re
logo 1
__
I Y.12 MIAMI,
411 LN
- :1 �lial - an
It
Is ..sZ..
7= == 11 11 _T 111 1
11113- 1111f1 11111.
mi
• +_ '= �1
oil
City Of
TIP 0 f£1n
mmmUIE
rj
N
alp /l—
I——
iL__ -4
December 20, 1993
Edina City Council:
Regarding the deer population management plan.
My property is adjacent to Braemar Park and I am visited
regularly by deer in groups of three to eight.
I like deer. They are fascinating animals. My son is an
avid deer hunter and I heartily approve.
I do not consider deer to be an asset to the community.
I could be more tolerant of the deer if they were not so
harmful to our shrubs, plants and flowers. They destroy my
tulips in the spring and they eat the hosta all summer long
and the tomatoes as they ripen.
I would be in favor of a plan to control the population.
And I would hope the plan be administered as humanely as possible.
I would also be in favor of a code amendment prohibiting feeding
deer within Edina.
With all the birds, owls, woodchuck, fox, raccoon and squirrels,
we have plenty of other wildlife right outside my windows.
Bill Greer
7125 Schey Drive
Edina MN 55439
FROM ABRAMS AND SPECTOR
12.15.1993 12107
RICHARD B. ABRAMS
SUITE Goo • 6800 FRANCE AVFNUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435
DAOember 15, 1993
Mayor Fred Richards
c/o city Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 33424 -1394
P. 1
AGENDA ITEM; IV.0 & VII.A.
Via Fax: 927 -7645
Res Deer ordinance and Braemar Boulevard name change
My wife and I would be in favor of eliminating AU the
deer in Edina. They eat our flowers, ruin our trees,
and in general constitute a nuisance. Reducing the
herd is appropriate but elimination of the herd would
be better as far as we are concerned.
The Braemar golf facility is used by large numbers of
citizens from outside as well as inside our city. To
change the name of the road leading to the Clubhouse
to John Harris Drive would in my opinion be confusing
to those who are not familiar with the location of the
Clubhouse. Certainly Mr. Harris' golfing ability is-
to be commended but I would think the City could find -
other ways to honor him.
9inoarely yours,
Richard H. Abrams
i g
c.
City of Edina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M-
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population objective management o educing proposed
plan recommends a three year program with
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population with a i in timated a 100 anssued
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken
using
by the Minnesota Department of Natural owed from the population wou d be Redestroyed
approved techniques. Individual animals rem
in western
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities
also �ons place
amendment to
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
ified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
All individuals who ident
summer have been sent this notice. J
•.
-� (612) 927 -8861
FAX (61219-17-76-4-;
City Hall 7DD 16121 927 -546;
-mi NEST 50TH STREET
EDINA. mIN- NESnTA 55424 -1394 e -
DAVID E. WACHAL
6708 Sioux Trail
Edina, Minnesota 55439
(612) 9447892
December 11, 1993
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Deer population; December 20 Council meeting
Deer have destroyed our garden for the past three summers. We have erected fences, but
to no avail.
We suggest that deer do not belong in populated areas such as residential Edina. We further
suggest that all deer be eliminated from Edina. To reduce the deer population to 40 - 50 will
not solve the nuisance problems caused by these animals.
In summary, please eliminate all deer from the Edina city limits.
Sincerely,
David Wachal
City of Edina
J
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
�.LLt, .ECG- »'�..�i ` -t`l� c1,�iL V� -E-r"y �'�'c�✓ L E/L�
ry.► -H L(i�..0 - L Y���L.. �iY V.y` - � `��C"- liG[�- /►i -.L /) .L� j[�Li V �� ��`�
✓ '/ / �L
y/ rfif G I
City Hall
��""' S (612) 927 -8861
L--
4801 WEST 50TH STREET /_ / iJL���"3�1 F.�\ ibl li 9?' -'04;
EDINA. MINNESOTA 554'; -1393 / � �r `7 / TDD 1612 9_' - -54h;
�-qL
City of Edina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA C= COUNCIL
EDINA C= HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
� � �� G.�= t,- (iG "c.— Lei.,- t���• -��(� G.%��,LZ `-C_` ���� 7, �.�� �` �� ��/ J �t�
—L G- -i-/
City Hall - '��`Z��`�? `7 �='�, ����'`y`� `�`` '� '� (612) 927 -8861
48(11 WEST 30TH STREET ,� — � / ✓�L � / � / FAX (h Q') 93' -7645
EDItiA..�tl�`ESCIT� 55424 -1393 G"�V " `G LCG—G" c -' TDD (6 12) 927 -5461
VZR;.1 ticket
Ct
r
� o � �u �l ✓vl�bc�c-s�
ely
� ,ho
—70orC
X f five rf -- Fe_, w,*f'h t c0ecl1-
w� j4rerl / , tNOvlftl be cA- d x
,ce�ti/ac� .-�1i- � 'l woa-�S �(, L. f e✓.Qy. � % '/� / ceast � bo.�.cf e �h/e�,�� ,✓°� }i 1,� v✓/ oe. `rce _ 740
ol f ee&- . ` &i e �
2
Awl
rr�.►�S�
7`5
Jee(- Amd -fAieQ
Lie,iS A,& f' C/"G97L d- p-- 7-,ke- C(ee,02- 0 2 7fhi.el��elVjo +^
?,-5.
o CA
-� � the w•�
ho ✓ /cf yv� be
ft
�5
7. t-4
9- V-�-c
c !1
Zf e.
Gcz' Of�v d'�. e��,,. &x2r--e
71cJ
o�9g
r J,
City of Edina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA CTTY HALL.
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
1"- .7¢_IL, � � P/L c r "�� cxZki
� � �� ; � •rte �
City Hall ✓ (61262 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424-1391 ��-' TDD 1612) 927 -5161
fir`
17
GUY PONTIUS
C 0 N S V 1. r A\ r
;020 MARK TERRACE DRIVE
.MINNEAPOLIS • .MN • -,15
TELEPHONE: 612 9+1 :.
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council members:
December 13,1993
I'd like to register my support for both the:
1. Proposed deer population management program
2. Proposed amendment to the City Code prohibiting the
artificial feeding of deer within Edina
I am unable to attend the December 20,1993 Council meeting. You may
recall I wrote to each of you, and Gordon Hughes in September 1993. A
copy of that letter is attached.
I'd also like to commend the Council and the City for the way in which this
sensitive matter has been handled.
c.c. Gordon Hughes
Sincerely Y
1/ • ���t
Gu V Pontius
(over)
GUY PONTIUS
C U N i l I. 1' A N T
7020 NARK TERRACE DRIVE
MINNEAPOLIS • NN . 55+35
Gordon Hughes
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina NIN. 55424
TELEPHONE: 6i: 9+1 .1 1 +3
Dear Mr Hughes:
September 22, 1993
We have lived at this address for twenty seven years.
During thch of you rove our property by planting over 30 trees,
some are now over 2 feet in diameter, and a wide variety of
shrubs and perennial flowers. The investment in time and
money has been a personally gratifying experience. And in our
and our neighbors opinion it has enhanced the beauty and
environment of this neighborhood.
About five years ago we began to see an occasional deer.
Each succeeding winter their numbers increased. Last winter
several groups of 2 or 3 were a daily occurrence; herds of 8 to 10
animals were common. 1993 is the first summer we have
experienced groups of 3 and 4 deer on an ongoing basis. The
coming winter promises larger numbers again.
Its difficult to describe the magnitude of the damage these
animals have caused. They have destroyed the lower branches of
many of the mature pines and killed most of the second growth
maples, oaks and aspen. Most small deciduous shrubs and
perennials have or are being destroyed. Even annuals planted in
pots on our front porch and patio have been decimated.
We have tried a wide variety of measures to dissuade the
deer. Some work temporarily but none has been an effective
deterrent.
The deer are of course doing what comes naturally. The
problem is there are to many of them; and their habitat is being
destroyed with urbanization. The result is more deer in Edina
than public property can support.
Therefore, I'd like to ask that you and the city council give
serious consideration to culling and downswing the deer herd to
numbers that can be supported on public land. I believe that
both the herd and property owners benefit from it.
Thank you for your consideration.
Guy V. Pontius
o e
O
�'V
\ ~�ONtl�f1M•tiO�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item # I' . C . & VII . A .
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
Information Only
Date: DECEMBER 20, 1993
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN
❑
Resolution
Ordinance i
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt the recommendations of the proposed deer population management plan. Grant
First Reading to Ordinance No. 1993 -14, An Ordinance Prohibiting the Intentional Feeding
of Deer.
Info /Background
On December 20, 1993, the City Council will again consider the proposed Deer Population
Management Plan. In accordance with your direction, mailed notice has been sent to all
individuals who provided their name and address on their response to last summers' deer
survey. Notice has also been published in the Edina Sun - Current. Also, in accordance with
your request, Ordinance No. 1993 -14 has been prepared for your consideration. This
Ordinance would prohibit the intentional feeding of deer within the City limits.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993 -14
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PROHIBIT THE INTENTIONAL FEEDING OF DEER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended to provide a new subsection 1000.12
as follows:
"1000.12. Intentional Feeding of Deer.
Subd. 1. Feeding Prohibited. No person shall feed deer within the City. For
purposes of this subdivision, feeding shall mean the provision of one half cubic foot
or more of grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay or other edible material either on the
ground or at a height of less than five feet above the ground, in a manner that
attracts deer. Living food sources such as trees and other live vegetation shall not
be considered as deer feeding.
Subd. 2. Exception. The provisions of Subd. 1 of this subsection shall not apply to
the employees or agents of the City, the County, the State, the Federal government
or veterinarians who in the course of their official duties have deer in their custody
or under their management."
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
PROPOSED DEER POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
BACKGROUND
The City Council has discussed the concept of deer population control on several
occasions during the past five years. In 1988, representatives of the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources and Hennepin Parks discussed deer population dynamics and
movements with the City Council. These representatives noted that Edina's deer population
is part of a larger herd which occupies Bloomington and Eden Prairie. They noted that
population reduction efforts in Edina alone would probably be unsuccessful due to deer
immigration for the other cities.
In the winter of 1991 -1992, the City of Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, the DNR, and
the Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a deer control program within Bloomington. In 1991-
1992, 335 deer were killed by sharpshooters and sport hunters. In the winter of 1992 -1993,
369 deer were killed. For this coming winter, a goal of 370 deer kills has been established.
In future years, lower numbers of deer kills will be required in order to maintain a deer
population density of approximately 22 deer per square mile of habitat.
The City of Eden Prairie has established a committee for the purpose of
recommending population control alternatives to the City Council. At present, the
Committee has not completed its work. Due to Bloomington's program and Eden Prairie's
possible program, a control program in Edina may now be more feasible.
On September 20, 1993, the Edina City Council received the results of a survey
concerning Edina's deer population that was included in the Spring issue of About Town.
On October 4, 1993, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report and
recommendation concerning deer population management in Edina.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
White- tailed deer are the most abundant and best -known large herbivore in the
United States. Deer are extremely adaptable for co- existence with the human population
and enjoy a high -rate of reproductive success even within major metropolitan areas.
Edina's deer herd has increased significantly during the past 10 years. Winter aerial
surveys flown by Hennepin Parks show the deer population in the Braemar Park area
increased from six animals in 1984 to 52 animals in 1993. Hennepin Parks reported similar
increases in neighboring cities.
Increases in Edina's deer population coupled with the development of remaining
lands have led to more and more contacts between deer and residents. Many of these
encounters are welcomed by residents. However, as the deer and human populations have
1 - -
grown, more and more of the encounters have become unwelcome. The following concerns
have been expressed by residents:
o Public Health Issues - Especially Lyme Disease
o Plant/Landscaping Damage
o Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
A. Public Health/Lyme Disease
Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria which can be carried by deer ticks. The
disease is. not usually fatal but can cause a variety of symptoms including
fever, chills, headache, dizziness, muscle aches, joint pain and chronic fatigue.
The disease also affects the cardiac and nervous system and can lead to
arthritic conditions and /or heart arrhythmia. Early diagnosis of the disease
aids in successful treatment using antibiotics.
The deer tick is carried by a variety of warm blooded animals. Not only white -
tailed deer but also mice, birds, woodchucks, dogs, cattle, and other animals
are hosts for the deer tick. It is now believed that the adult deer tick will
feed on a larger host such as a dog or deer before dropping off and laying
eggs on the ground. The nymph stage is believed to feed on smaller animals
such as rodents and birds. The nymph stage of the tick is very small, about
the size of a pin head and is extremely difficult to detect. Birds may play a
major role in dissemination of the deer tick.
The mere presence of deer ticks in the environment does not mean the risk
for Lyme disease is present. The tick must harbor the bacteria which cause
Lyme disease and not all ticks have the bacteria. Some areas of the country.
have a very low incidence of the bacteria in the ticks (less than 10 %) and
other areas have as high .as 90% of the ticks positive for the bacteria.
The Minnesota Department of Health has conducted investigations of Lyme
disease since 1982. During 1991 and 1992, 161 cases of Lyme disease were
reported in the Twin Cities area. Only 22% of these cases had likely exposure
within the metro area and most of these exposures occurred in Anoka and
Washington counties which adjoin those portions of Minnesota and Wisconsin
with the major concentration of Lyme disease harboring ticks. The results of
the Department of Health surveillance confirm that the risk for acquiring
Lyme disease in most of the metro area is less than one- per 100,000
population annually. The risk is particularly low in the southern and western
suburbs. Although Lyme disease must be continually studied, based upon the
above data, the control of Edina's deer population as a Lyme disease
preventative is not warranted.
2
Some residents have expressed concern regarding excessive feces produced by
deer. Although this may present an occasional nuisance, no significant public
health risks are associated with deer feces.
B. Plant and Landscape Damage
Deer predation of landscaping, especially ornamentals, is the most commonly
received complaint with respect to deer. Although deer are not the only
wildlife species contributing to such damage, they probably are responsible for
most large scale predation. City staff provides written materials as well as a
video to interested residents who wish to discourage predation. Preventative
techniques such as fencing and repellents have been shown to be effective in
reducing damage. However, these techniques, especially the use of repellents,
require a serious commitment by affected residents. Normal residential
fencing is not effective as a deterrent unless it is very tall. Other fence
designs or electric fencing may be effective but might not be compatible with
uses of adjacent properties.
Some repellents are effective in reducing predation. However, constant
vigilance is necessary to maintain effectiveness. Repellents must be reapplied
periodically based upon weather conditions and the growth rate of vegetation.
Given the cost, repellents are most effective for relatively small landscaped
areas.
If the City's deer population is reduced, will predation of landscaping be
eliminated? Probably not, although the frequency and magnitude of predation
should be reduced. Even if the City were to attempt to eliminate all deer
from Edina, it is virtually impossible to effect this level of control. Therefore,
even with an aggressive population control program, some predation will
continue. Residents living in high deer population areas are best advised to
design or modify landscape areas to reduce the potential for predation. For
its part, the City should make known to residents any advancements or
improvements in fencing and repellent technology.
C. Traffic Safety and Personal Safety
Automobile /deer collisions are an on -going concern and the risk of such
collisions increases as deer populations and traffic volumes increase. The area
of greatest concern is Highway 169 and the Crosstown Highway west of
Highway 100 where the speed and volume of traffic contributes to more
serious deer collisions, or collisions with other vehicles while drivers attempt
to avoid deer. Although collisions also occur on City streets, the speed of
vehicles in such settings reduces the chance of serious injury. Significant
vehicle damage, however, can occur at even reduced speeds.
Some residents have reported that deer have become extremely tame and no
longer flee at the sight of people. Some residents are concerned that such
deer may become hostile and present a risk to personal safety. Although deer
may occasionally startle a homeowner, reports of attacks by wild deer are
almost non - existent. (Attacks by captive deer seem more common.)
POPULATION GROWTH AND-CARRYING CAPACITY
Deer are very successful reproducers. A mature doe typically produces twins annually
and may produce triplets. The University of Minnesota reports an average of 1.33 fetuses
per mature doe in a study of North Oaks, Minnesota. In the absence of natural predators
and sport hunting, and with proper habitat, an area's deer population can increase rapidly.
Hyland Park Reserve's population was estimated to have doubled in seven years immediately
preceding commencement of a control program. The North Oaks population increased from
240 deer in 1976 to about 800 deer in 1993 even though population control programs were
implemented in seven of those years.
Deer populations eventually reach an upper limit based on the quality and amount
of food sources as well as the availability of winter habitat. The upper limit at which deer
remain in good physical condition is referred to as the Biological Carrying Capacity. As the
Carrying Capacity is exceeded, the physical condition of the population and its habitat
deteriorate.
Although biological carrying capacity provides a proper measure of deer population
and habitat health, it may not be an appropriate measure of deer populations in urban
areas. As such, some have suggested the term "Cultural Carrying Capacity" as a better
standard for urban areas. Cultural Carrying Capacity, or the maximum number of deer that
can co -exist compatibly with local human populations, is a function of the sensitivity of
people to the presence of deer. Cultural Carrying Capacity is understandably much more
difficult to measure than Biological Carrying Capacity in that different individuals have
different sensitivities to the deer population.
RECOMMENDED POPULATION OBJECTIVES
The Minnesota DNR recommended to the Minnesota River Valley Deer
Management Task Force a deer population density goal of 15 - 25 animals per square mile
of habitat. The Cities of Bloomington and North Oaks have established population goals
of 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat. Based upon the experience of the DNR and
other cities practicing deer management programs, staff believes that a goal of 15 - 25 per
square mile of habitat is reasonable for Edina.
For purposes of establishing population objectives, we have attempted to identify deer
habitat within Edina. Habitat comprises adequate food, water, protective cover, and living
space in a suitable arrangement to promote a healthy population. For population purposes,
we believe that only those lands set aside as parks or open space, or large tracts of
undeveloped private land should constitute deer habitat. Although deer roam widely and
4
utilize many areas such as residential lots, we believe that such areas do not provide all of
the necessary components of deer habitat and, therefore, should not be relied upon for
population purposes. Similarly, not all parks or open space land should be viewed as deer
habitat. This is especially true of land lying east of Highway 100 which is isolated from the
primary ' habitat afforded by the Nine Mile Creek corridor and Braemar Park. In our
opinion, that portion of Edina lying east of Highway 100 is highly urbanized and not well
suited to support a deer population. Therefore, no habitat has been delineated in this area.
The attached map illustrates Edina deer habitat. The area of this habitat is
approximately 1250 acres or two square miles. Based upon a recommended density of 15 -
25 deer per square mile, this habitat is capable of supporting 30 - 50 deer.
Based upon the 1992 and 1993 aerial population surveys, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources estimates that our Spring 1993 deer population was approximately 100
animals. The DNR has developed a model which is used to predict population growth.
(See attached letter from John Parker, Area Wildlife Manager.) Based upon this model,
the Edina deer population is projected to grow to 130 - 140 animals by Spring 1994. It
should be noted, however, that the. model would have predicted a similar increase in the
population from 1992 to 1993. The aerial survey, however, indicates that the population
remained stable during this time. This stability could be due to a number of reasons
including: 1) higher mortality (e.g. deer/vehicle collisions), 2) deer movement out of the
area, and /or 3) imprecise aerial surveys. Even if Edina's deer population has reached an
upper limit of. animals due to high annual mortality, this population is approximately
double what should be supported by our habitat.
In order to restore a better balance between the deer population and habitat, the
DNR estimates that 60 - 80 deer may have to be removed each year for two to three years
in order to reach a density of 15 - 25 deer per square mile of habitat. Given the uncertainty
concerning the current growth rate of our deer population, a more conservative removal rate
during the first year of a program is warranted. The DNR recommends, however, that no
fewer than 50 animals should be removed in the first year to effect a population reduction.
The population dynamics and removal recommendations could then be re- evaluated after
the 1994 aerial survey.
DEER POPULATION REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
Population reduction can be accomplished in a variety of ways:
o Regulated Hunting
o Trapping and transferring deer to other locations
o Trapping and Killing
o Sharpshooters
o Birth Control
o Allow nature to take its course
5
o Re- introduce Predators
Some of these alternatives are probably not feasible for Edina's situation. Regulated
hunting is clearly the most economical and effective method, but it simply is not feasible
given our level of development. Likewise, the re- introduction of natural predators such as
timber wolves or mountain lions is not possible in our area. Other techniques deserve
individual discussion.
A. Trapping and Transferring to Other Locations
Trapping and translocating deer is often viewed as our acceptable alternative
to control programs such as hunting or sharpshooting. However, a recent
study of a translocation program in Wisconsin concludes that translocation is
difficult to justify as a humane alternative to other methods. Of the 12
translocated deer in the Wisconsin study that were equipped with radio-
telemetry collars, 10 were dead within 231 days of relocation. Although
relocation may be viable for reducing Edina's deer population, one should not
assume that translocated deer live idealized lives in other locations.
Translocated deer may also simply contribute to an overpopulation in their
new locations. The DNR believes that deer are at their biological carrying
capacity in all parts of Minnesota except the extreme northeasterly portion of
the state. Therefore, there is virtually nowhere to which deer could be
relocated that would contribute to the overall well -being of the population.
B. Birth Control
Birth control for deer may be a viable solution in the future. However, birth
control is not currently available for free roaming populations. Although
some contraceptives may be effective, none have been developed for deer
population control.
C. Allow Nature to Take Its Course
In the absence of a population control program, the deer population will
eventually reach the upper limit sustainable by Edina's habitat. It is difficult
to predict what this upper limit will be or what will happen when it's reached.
It is known that at such levels, populations are prone to disease or starvation
and a general diminution of population health. Prior to reaching this point,
it is likely that complaints concerning predation of plants will increase
markedly as will deer/vehicular collisions.
D. Sharpshooting
Sharpshooting has been used within the City of Bloomington since 1991.
Sharpshooting has been conducted by law enforcement officers who attended
training sessions prior to the start of the program. During the winter of 1992-
1993, sharpshooters killed 319 deer in Bloomington. The cost of
11
sharpshooting in 1991 -1992 averaged $68.23 per deer although the DNR
estimates a total cost including disposal of carcasses to exceed $100 /deer.
Carcasses are turned over to the DNR which distribute meat to food shelves
and other organizations.
Sharpshooting is an effective method of population control in areas where
hunting is not feasible. Safety is a primary consideration. In Edina, we
believe sharpshooting over baited locations would be feasible within parts of
Braemar Park. Other locations in Edina may be too intensely developed to
sharpshoot due to safety considerations. These locations would have to be
researched more carefully prior to sharpshooting.
D. Trap and Kill
The University of Minnesota oversees deer population control efforts in North
Oaks. Live traps were utilized on 32 sites in North Oaks in the winter of
1992 -1993. A total of 171 deer were captured using this technique. Deer
were destroyed following capture. The cost per deer was $131.00.
Trapping and killing deer appears to be an effective method of population
control, especially in a fully- developed area. However, it may not be as
effective as sharpshooting and is clearly more expensive. The University has
recommended that the North Oaks trapping program be augmented with
sharpshooting in that sufficient numbers of deer cannot be eliminated through
trapping alone to achieve population goals.
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our review of the population data, the public opinion survey, review of
the literature, discussions with wildlife managers, and discussions with representatives of
other cities, staff concludes the following:
0, Edina's deer population is part of a larger heard which populates principally
Bloomington and Eden Prairie.
o The deer population in Edina is increasing relatively rapidly and appears to
have exceeded the population density standards used by the DNR and other
cities. It is impossible to predict if and when the deer population will reach
levels which will result in severe deterioration of the health of the population.
o The deer population in parts of Edina may have exceeded the cultural
carrying capacity based upon the responses to our public opinion survey.
However, residents have differing opinions as to the desirability of deer in
their neighborhoods and methods which should be used for deer population
control.
7
o Staff estimates approximately two square miles of suitable habitat in Edina.
Based upon a population density of 15 - 25 deer per square mile, 30 - 50 deer
can be supported by our habitat. Our current deer population based upon the
1993 aerial survey is approximately 100 animals. Based upon the potential
growth rate of the population, a significant number of animals have to be
removed over the course of two to three years if the City wishes to reduce the
population to a level more commensurate with its habitat.
o Unfortunately, techniques for reducing deer populations without killing
individual animals are not currently available. The most feasible techniques
for deer population reduction are the removal of a predetermined number of
animals by trained sharpshooters or live trapping animals and destroying them
humanely.
o Staff believes that trained sharp shooters could be employed in a safe manner
in the westerly portion of Braemar Park during the winter months. (The City
already maintains a gun range in this area.) No other areas of the City
appear to be feasible for sharp shooting due to the proximity of the human
population. In such areas, trapping followed by killing of animals may be
feasible. The most likely locations for a trapping program would be Bredesen
Park, Van Valkenburg Park, and Todd Park.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon our investigations, we recommend the following:
o The Council should authorize a three year program with an objective of
reducing Edina's deer population to 40 - 50 animals. If the program is
authorized to start this winter, an initial goal of removing 50 animals should
be established. Staff notes that it may be very difficult to reach this initial
goal due to a late start for the, program. (As the winter progresses, it will be
increasingly difficult to attract deer to baited sites for sharpshooting or
trapping.) As an alternative, the program could commence next winter with
revised removal objectives based upon the 1994 aerial survey. If the Council
authorizes a three year program, staff would proceed to develop specific
sharpshooting and /or trapping strategies for implementation.
o Staff recommends passage of an ordinance amendment prohibiting the
artificial feeding of deer. Although feeding probably has little effect on the
health or population level of the deer herd, it may attract deer into residential
areas where they may then prey on landscaping or become -more susceptible
to vehicular mishaps.
o The City and State should devise a better system of documenting vehicular
8
accidents involving deer. It is possible that many accidents occurring on the
Crosstown, Highway 100 and Highway 169 may not be reported to us. This
information is necessary to evaluate the relationship between our deer
population and the risk of vehicular accidents.
o The City should continue to cooperate with Hennepin Parks and other
jurisdictions in the annual aerial survey of the deer population. This
information is essential to measure the dynamics of the deer population and
effects of population control efforts.
o The ideal deer population for Edina is more a function of the cultural
carrying capacity than its biological carrying capacity. As such, we must
improve our methods of recording complaints /concerns that are received at
City Hall regarding deer. As with the annual aerial survey, this would provide
a method of measuring the effects of changes in the deer population.
December 1993
0
:612; 772 -7981 12/02/93
?ile:GHLETTER.Itr
Area Wildlife Office
Metro Region Hleadquarters
1200 Warner Road
Saint Paul MN 55106
Gordon Hughes
3dina Assistant City Manager
4801 W 50th Street
Edina MN 55424
Dear ^:r . -Hughes:
At your request, have examined Edina °s aerial deer survey data
fro:. 1992 and 1993. _ have used this data in our deer population
.ode- to get a rough indication of .he ;umber of deer which would
^ave r.o qe removed is the City decides that population control is
needed.
estimated the pre -fawn 1993 (April -May) population to be 100.
his is based on survey courts of 95 i_n 1992 and 84 in 1993. These
counts seem to indicate a stable oouulation. Our -model would
predict an increasing population. Starting wit:^ a population of
100, and assu.:.ing relatively low reproduction, a population of i00
4- 1993 should grow to about 130 to 140 by April 1994. The
stability could be due to higher Char. expected mortality (deer -
vehicle collisions), deer movement out of the area, or imprecision
in the survey.
You have identified to potential deer habitat in Edina to consist
of about 2 sauare miles. he population density would be at least
50 per square Nile of ::abitat. 1 would consider this to be a high
aensi;y and 1 would expect prooiems such as damage to commercial,
residential, and natural vegetation, and high rates of vehicle
collisions. The JNR and US Fish- & Wildlife Service have
established a deer population density goal of 15 to 25 deer per
scuare ..._le in t::e Fort Snelling State sari: Minnesota Valley
Refuge area.
DEER REIV?OVAL. Modeiiing - esuits ndicate that your population
could•oe reduced to about 40 to 50 by removing 100 deer this
winter. under a low reproduction assumption, a removal of 50 deer
per year for two years would reduce the herd to 60 to 70. Under a
nor�:al reproduction assumption, th is level of removal would lead to
no C_ ^range 1_ ^_ t--.e popu-at_O_^_ or even a sight increase. =f you
dec.-.;.de to remove deer, would recd mena that you start With no
fewer than 50 per year. Actuallv, 60 to 80 per year would probably
result in a gradual decrease - a c:_ange from 50 - 60 per sauare
..._le to 15 - 25 deer per sauare ..._le in 2 to 3 years. These goals
should be set after an aerial survey this January. They should be
modified based on subsecuent aerial surveys. -wo or more surveys
°gig es
?age 2
12/02/93
may even be made in the same year during cont=oi to check on
progress.
will do some more model Iing before the council meeting. 1 wiii
be avaiiabie to assist wi ^_ goal- setting your ^ecis ior. is to
control deer.
Since_ei
dn ?ar:cer, Area wi+dii:e Manager
cc: roger Jo_ ^_'_:son
REFERENCES
The following sources were used as a basis for this report and recommendations:
1. Mark R. Ellingwood and Suzanne L. Caturano, An Evaluation of Deer
Management Options. 1988.
2. Jay B. McAninch and Jon M. Parker, Urban Deer Management Programs: A
Facilitated Approach. Transactions of the Fifty -sixth North American and
Natural Resources Conference. 1991.
3. Jay B. McAninch. Contraception in White- Tailed Deer, Status of Current
Activities. Minnesota D.N.R. Memo, March 10, 1993.
4. Greg Ingraham. 1993 -94 Program Summary and Deer Control Results 1991-
23, City of Bloomington Memo. August 12, 1993.
5. City of Edina, Deer Survey Results. September, 1993.
6. Peter A. Jordan, Ronald A. Moen, and Dale L. Krueger. Management of a
Suburban Deer Population in the City of North Oaks, Minnesota. Memo.
May 28, 1993.
7. Beverly K. Bryant and William Ishmael. Movement and Mortality Patterns
of Resident and Translocated Suburban White- Tailed Deer. Wildlife
Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. 1991.
8. Excerpt From Disease Control Newsletter. Minnesota Department of Health.
June, 1993.
FROM ABRAMS AND SPECTOR
12.15.1993 12:87
RICHARD B. ABRAM$
-SUITE Goo • 8800 FRANCE AvFNUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435
December 15, 1993
Mayor Fred Richards
c/o City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
P. 1
AGENDA ITEM IV.0 & VII.A.
Via Fax: 927 -7645
Ret Doer ordinance and Braemar Boulevard name change
My wife and I would be in favor of eliminating AU the
deer in Edina. They eat our flowers, ruin our tress,
and in general constitute a nuisance. Reducing the
herd is appropriate but elimination of the herd would
be better as far as we are concerned.
The Braemar golf facility is used by large numbers of
citizens from outside as well as inside our city. To
change the name of the road leading to the clubhouse
to John Harris Drive would in my opinion be confusing
to those who are not familiar with the location of the
Clubhouse. Certainly Mr. Harris' golfing ability is
to be commended but I would think the City could find
other ways to honor him.
sincerely yours,
Richard B. Abrams
i e
c,
City of Edina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer h anaob a management gof reducing proposed deer
plan recommends a three year program with a
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population undertaken in accordance a with a permit
ssued
The proposed population reduction would be using
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources from the population wou dpbe destroyed
approved techniques. Individual animals removed
as humanely as possible. All population rreiduCouncil ion wills also would
amendment to
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed
EDINA CM COUNCIL
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
,z i, -- i,- �,
(612) 927 -8861
City Hall (�`"' —�JJr FAX (6121917-7645,
TDD1612192i -53hI
48()1 WEST 50TH nt STREET
EDINA. I�NESC�TA 5523 -139 (
DAVID E. WACHAL
6708 Sioux Trail
Edina, Minnesota 55439
(612) 9447892
December 11, 1993
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Deer population; December 20 Council meeting
Deer have destroyed our garden for the past three summers. We have erected fences, but
to no avail.
We suggest that deer do not belong in populated areas such as residential Edina. We further
suggest that all deer be eliminated from Edina. To reduce the deer population to 40 - 50 will
not solve the nuisance problems caused by these animals.
In summary, please eliminate all deer from the Edina city limits.
Sincerely,
C:�: :a /
David Wachal
�'A r
1 , e • S,. Z `1`
City of Edina
J
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
/.; . / / - -i 3
--r-%w
1 • . �,,- , _�.LL�r G ^�ti.�c i,Ct —.r�.� I,`.C�� �l.��L V I �.�r� L
�/ L -(,a 4.�w
/'A, a ✓ - /�z l�
r
City Hall C�-
`�` 5 5 .3 (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET /- / _ �SC� FAX ((,I'. 9',7-76-4-,
EDINA. NAINNESOTA 55424-1394 ( ` �r / TDD (612- 927-34(,i
=� e ``
J• \JV
City otldina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 P.M.
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4801 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
�r ��/ �ti!''�C �� ° -.— ` , ��_ -��—: � -'i�� w� ✓GAG -GI' �,�- c.E��%�(. -,�.
L L��
i zC 'L
City Hall �`� -���' `7'�. C��t'`7"t�`�`` '� �Ll� (612) 927 -8861
181i1 WEST 30TH STREET �J _ „� "yt�.;.� t; � - /
FAX (h 11) 927 - 7645
EDINA. ',u\ \ES0T-\ 55424 -1394 G— "`� / / TDD 161 _'1 927 -5161
C.
J G `. Llc. -c c --
stdtel
=�.�.,NO
MA,?(,oiZ-
-70ort
FJ"'Y - ^,i/ S5113 y
g : )Dee./Z 1�1G,i+.a17 e,,+..T' /•mac .
b e, d►��e� <<'oJ}'e_, �t/� fh a-+n► !o►O tlL
w ovlo[ be Cam.
�c�ii10► -5 �eC�- d i .7 740 o,�
We_ O /-✓ " �
ecL+l ov(�. ✓eyiWb /es/ b ,/+ her.-
L../.e, we, r e.. o-re- bea✓h)Pv1 .47o7 # rN4S�
deer line �'%lGQ. 7 X�r% fh e-e �y h o ✓ (L Ofc �oAV,
w G o a
B-4-4C:, . /3, 1 -:2s
LOLL
5
1
ell
dla
/i" 4A..1r
r y
City of Edina
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Edina will meet at:
7:00 PAL
Monday, December 20, 1993
City Hall Council Chambers
4501 W. 50th Street
for the purpose of considering a proposed deer population management plan. The proposed
plan recommends a three year program with an objective of reducing Edina's deer
population to 40 - 50 animals. The current population is estimated to exceed 100 animals.
The proposed population reduction would be undertaken in accordance with a permit issued
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and would be accomplished using
approved techniques. Individual animals removed from the population would be destroyed
as humanely as possible. All population reduction activities would take place in western
Edina, principally in Braemar Park. The City Council will also consider an amendment to
the Edina City Code prohibiting the artificial feeding of deer within Edina.
The City Council will consider your comments and suggestions at their December 20, 1993,
meeting. Written comments should be addressed to:
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
All individuals who identified themselves on their response to the City's deer survey last
summer have been sent this notice.
�c-„�, `� � � 2c e,� �a-x. �1��' tit. �v� •�� -c^� -�
I
G1r�Z
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -764;
EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
tl
.YUY PONTIU S
C o N S I: i. r A N-
7020 MARK TERRACE DR:VE
.MINNEAPOLIS . .MN . "lik
TELEPHONE: 612 941 :.
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council members:
December 13,1993
I'd like to register my support for both the:
1. Proposed deer population management program
2. Proposed amendment to the City Code prohibiting the
artificial feeding of deer within Edina
I am unable to attend the December 20,1993 Council meeting. You may
recall I wrote to each of you, and Gordon Hughes in September 1993. A
copy of that letter is attached.
I'd also like to commend the Council and the City for the way in which this
sensitive matter has been handled.
c.c. Gordon Hughes
Sincerely Y
Gu V Pontius
(over)
GUY PONTIUS
C U N S l' 1. r A N T
7020 MARK TERRACE DRIVE
MINNEAPOLIS • M\ . 55+35
TELEPHONE: ai. = - I. 1 1 +5
Gordon Hughes
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina MN. 55424
Dear Mr Hughes:
September 22, 1993
We have lived at this address for twenty seven years.
During thch Of yOU rove our property by planting over 30 trees,
some are now over 2 feet in diameter, and a wide variety of
shrubs and perennial flowers. The investment in time and
money has been a personally gratifying experience. And in our
and our neighbors opinion it has enhanced the beauty and
environment of this neighborhood.
About five years ago we began to see an occasional deer.
Each succeeding winter their numbers increased. Last winter
several groups of 2 or 3 were a daily occurrence; herds of 8 to 10
animals were common. 1993 is the first summer we have
experienced groups of 3 and 4 deer on an ongoing basis. The
coming winter promises larger numbers again.
Its difficult to describe the magnitude of the damage these
animals have caused. They have destroyed the lower branches of
many of the mature pines and killed most of the second growth
maples, oaks and aspen. Most small deciduous shrubs and
perennials have or are being destroyed. Even annuals planted in
pots on our front porch and patio have been decimated.
We have tried a wide variety of measures to dissuade the
deer. Some work temporarily but none has been an effective
deterrent.
The deer are of course doing what comes naturally. The
problem is there are to many of them; and their habitat is being
destroyed with urbanization. The result is more deer in Edina
than public property can support.
Therefore, I'd like to ask that you and the city council give
serious consideration to culling and downswing the deer herd to
numbers that can be supported on public land. I believe that
both the herd and property owners benefit from it.
Thank you for your consideration.
Guy V. Pontius
December 20, 1993
Edina City Council:
Regarding the deer population management plan.
My property is adjacent to Braemar Park and I am visited
regularly by deer in groups of three to eight.
I like deer. They are fascinating animals. My son is an
avid deer hunter and I heartily approve.
I do not consider deer to be an asset to the community.
I could be more tolerant of the deer if they were not so
harmful to our shrubs, plants and flowers. They destroy my
tulips in the spring and they eat the hosta all summer long
and the tomatoes as they ripen.
I would be in favor of a plan to control the population.
And I would hope the plan be administered as humanely as possible.
I would also be in favor of a code amendment prohibiting feeding
deer within Edina.
With all the birds, owls, woodchuck, fox, raccoon and squirrels,
we have plenty of other wildlife right outside my windows.
Bill Greer
7125 Schey Drive
Edina MN 55439
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING
A DEER POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, a proposed Deer Population Management Plan (the Plan) has been
presented to and reviewed by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota;
WHEREAS, the proposed Plan would consist of a three year program with an
objective of reducing Edina's deer population to 40 - 50 animals;
WHEREAS, staff would proceed to develop specific sharpshooting and /or trapping
strategies for implementation;
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby approves and adopts the Deer
Population Management Plan as presented;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is hereby directed to develop specific
strategies for implementation.
ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 1993.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of December 20, 1993, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of December, 1993.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
° cn: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
°.
• �Uw,rnn�J .
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: December 13, 1993 AGENDA ITEM VI.A.
ITEM_ DESCRIPTION: FIRE DEPARTMENT ONE TON, 4 -WHEEL DRIVE
Company PICK-UP Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Thane Hawkins Chevrolet j, $17,937.00
2. Iten Chevrolet 2. $19,316.34•
3. Superior Ford 3. $18,270.00
4. 4.
5. .5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Thane Hawkins $17,937.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
One -ton, four -whee. drive pick -up truck. eplacement for 1980
pick -up truck. 19a--,) 5/_9e C .IV4 /M/S
- Signature
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within
Kenneth
FIRE
° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE.
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT:_ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000
DATE: December 8, 1993 AGENDA ITEM VI . B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Range Balls for Braemar Golf Course
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Spalding Professional Golf 1. $25,150
2. Wilson Golf Sporting Goods 2. $31,250-
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Spalding Professional Golf $25,150
.GENERAL INFORMATION:
REPLACEMENT BALLS:
5000 dozen range balls for the-Braemar Golf Course driving range and
Golf Dome.
(If paid within 15 days then $23,900)
The Recommended bid is
-Y
within budget not
Kenneth
�Qallin, Finance Director
�'6�
Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: December 13, 1993
AGENDA ITEM V=
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fertilizers for the Golf Course
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Precision Turf and Chemical, Inc. 1. $11,482.83
2. Turf Supply Company 2, $13,047.10
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Precision Turf and Chemical $11,482.83
GENERAL INFORMATION:
These products should cover the main fertilizer requirements for all
fairways, tees and greens on all courses for-1994.
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Kenneth
Department
iet Wallin, F ance Direc'
Wand, City Manag r
Mil
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE__
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM :. Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosfand City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE 20 December, 1993 AGENDA ITEM VI.D.
i
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Computer Equipment - Engineering'.
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
j
1 Ameridata $6,494.49
2.
I
3.
1,4.
5.
(State Contract M -2635)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Ameridata
2.
3.
4.
5.
$6,4.94.49
i GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is a computer upgrade -for engineering department.
This purchase will be funded from the equipment replacement
fund.
nature ;
The Recommended bid is
—
within budget no,
Public Works - Engineering
Department
Kenneth Rosfand City Manager
A.
° e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
� o.
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: David A. Velde
VIA: Kenneth Rosiand, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: December 20, 1993
AGENDA ITEM VI.E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1994 Public Health Nursing Service Contract
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Bloomington Division of Public Health 1. 137,010
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This contract is at the approved budget expenditure level for
1994. This contract covers the costs of sliding fee scale
services delivered to Edina residents and other cost for
service which are not reimbursed by private pay, insurance,
medicare, and medicaid. Historically, the city cost has been
about 45 -490 of the total cost of services delivered to Edina
residents.
Lro, AY Health
Signature Department
The Recommended bid is X
within budget not within budg John allin
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
ZNA.
O
• ,N�bRMM•4O�
innn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda item #'II.B.
From: CRAIG G. SWANSON
Consent
U
TRAFFIC SAFETY
Information Only
Date: DECEMBER 20, 19 9 3
Mgr. Recommends
F7
To HRA
Subject:
T
To Council
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT
Action
E
Motion
C
Resolution
i
C
Ordinance
C
Discussion
Recommendation:
Motion to accept and enact Section A and acknowledge
Sections —B—and- C -; -- - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - - - --
Info /Background:
The staff recommends the items included in the attached
Staff Report. Those recommendations have been discussed
with the citizens making the requests and the owners of
property that would be affected.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
DECEMBER 8, 1993
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 8, 1993. Staff present
included the Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer, the Chief of Police, the Traffic
Safety Coordinator, and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
December 20, 1993, Council agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval.
(1) Request to improve driveway accessibility at 4628 Browndale (Edgebrook
Place). Request made by Robert Miller, 4628 Browndale.
The request by Mr. Miller is predicated on the fact that Edgebrook Place was
changed from one way southbound to one way northbound. Mr. Miller's
driveway and the geometrics of the road make entry and egress more difficult
as a result of this change, and nearly impossible when vehicles are parked
opposite his driveway. He requests no parking restrictions be established on
the west side of Edgebrook Place to permit him access.
The staff discussed relative measurements and vehicle movements related to
the request. It was concluded that in the space available (48 feet) in front of
4630 Edgebrook Place could contain a restricted area of 24 feet and a
permitted parking area of 24 feet.
recommendation is contingent upon a favorable response by the property
owner of 4630 Edgebrook Place.
(2) Request to remove the Dead End sign on Parklawn Avenue at York Avenue
and install a directional arrow at Parklawn Avenue at Edinborough Way.
Request made by the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
The staff recommends the above request.
to TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 8, 1993
Page 2
(3) Request to remove the lane reduction sign and replace it with a "Lane
Narrows" sign in the 4900 block of W. 77th Street.
Request made by the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
The staff recommends the above request.
(4) Request to control speed on Olinger Boulevard.
Request made by Maureen Warner (11 -4-93) and Richard Maxwell (12- 1 -93).
The staff reviewed speed surveys which found 85 percentile speeds in the
range of 34 MPH to 36 MPH. The morning rush hour survey identified 7.5% of
the vehicles traveling at a speed at which they would normally be cited. The
85 percentile speeds are similar to other collector roadways in the City.
Olinger Boulevard is a collector roadway connecting to Blake Road and
provides a major north -south route in northwestern Edina. Accidents are at a
low level.
The staff recommends that the speed survey results be provided to the Police
Department and Olinger Boulevard be included as an enforcement area.
(5) Stop line request for Vernon Avenue at Gleason Road.
Request made by Ed Birdsong (citizen) and John Scheerer (City employee).
The staff recommends the installation of a painted "Stop" line as requested.
(6) Request to review safety concerns due to speed and volume on Maple Road.
Request made by John Anderson, 4804 Maple Road.
The staff reviewed two speed surveys which identified speeds similar to other
residential streets in Edina. Two 48 hours counts were conducted which
revealed a 23% reduction in volume between August and November with a
current total of under 500 vehicles per day. No accidents have been reported
during the pat three years. During the speed surveys it was noted that
vehicles traversing the 90 degree turn of Maple Road and W. 48th Street
tended to cut the corner by crossing the center of the roadway.
The staff recommends that a yellow centerline be painted at the turn of Maple
Road at W. 48th Street.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 8, 1993
Page 3
(7) Request to consider parking restrictions on the East Frontage Road to T.H. 100
(Normandale Road) between W. 66th Street and W. 70th Street.
Request made by Ms. Rosemary Wilder, 4905 Payton Court.
The request was predicated on overflow parking from Christ Presbyterian
Church which parks on both sides of Normandale Road and constricts it to the
point of making it difficult for large vehicles such as firetrucks, etc.
The staff discussed the issue. Normandale Road is 24 feet wide and normally,
parking would only be permitted on one side of a road that width.
Additionally, snowbanks would further reduce the roadway width causing other
potential problems.
The staff recommends "No Parking Anytime" signs be posted on the East
Frontage Road (Normandale Road) between W. 66th Street and W. 70th Street.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
(1) Request for Stop sign on Arden Avenue at its intersection with Bruce Place.
Request made by Gayle Groth, 5116 Arden Avenue.
The request is predicated on the grade and curve of Arden Avenue and the
safety of children during periods of adverse road conditions. The requestor
reports vehicles sliding off the roadway during icy conditions.
The staff reviewed the request and the facts related to it. The grade at the
Arden Avenue and Bruce place intersection, southbound, is 7% and unsuitable
for safely placing a Stop sign. Arden Avenue is a low volume residential street
with no accidents at Bruce Place. A short duration speed survey revealed
appropriate residential speeds. The warrants of the Multi -way Stop Sign Policy
are not met with the given facts.
Other possible solutions were discussed including physical barriers, moving
bus stops, walkways, and sanding routes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 8, 1993
Page 4
The staff reached consensus and recommends:
o No stop signs should be installed.
o Sanding routes should be altered to include sanding the Arden Avenue
grade.
o The residents should be encouraged to petition for sidewalks.
o The Park Department should consider installation of physical barriers at
the north end of Arden Park.
(2) Request for Stop signs on Blake Road to control speed.
Request made by Mrs. Miriam Rickert, 5304 Blake Road.
The request was based on concerns about speed and volume. The staff
reviewed the facts and discussed the request. Blake Road is a collector
roadway carrying nearly 4000 trips per day. It connects with Olinger Boulevard
and is an important north -south route in northwest Edina. One accident has
been reported on Blake Road since its reconstruction. Speed surveys revealed
a northbound 85 percentile speed of 40 MPH. Over 14% of the vehicles
surveyed would normally be issued citations for excessive speed. The
warrants of the Multi -way Stop Sign Policy were not met given the facts
presented.
The staff recommends that the Stop sign request be denied and the issue be
referred to the Police Department for enforcement action.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Request for traffic control signs on Zenith Avenue at W. 56th Street (Revisited).
Request made by Mr. Michael Byrne, 5620 Chowen Avenue.
This request is based on Mr. Byrne's impression that W. 56th Street is driven
as a through- street and he reports near miss accidents at Zenith Avenue which
is uncontrolled. Coincidentally, this intersection was studied during October
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 8, 1993 40
Page 5
based on an independent Stop sign request for W. 56th Street. At that time
warrants were not met. W. 56th Street is a low volume, low speed, accident -
free roadway. During surveys, little cross traffic was noted on Zenith Avenue.
The intersection is open with no sight restrictions. A Yield sign was discussed
and based on the experience of the staff it was discounted. The intersection of
W. 40th Street at Lynn Avenue was controlled by Yield signs until mid -1993 .
and it demonstrated a high accident history.
The staff recommends that no action be taken at this time. The request should
be continued until springtime when 24 -hour counts can be conducted and an
update of the facts can be reviewed.
e,,
ch
• �'�YbgelOpwteV
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
T0: _ Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman,
City Engineer /
Date: 20 December, 1993
Subject:
Public Hearing -
Feasibility Report &
Set Hearing Date
Ornamental Street
Lighting
Improvement No. L -37
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VII - c
Consent
0
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
To Council
Action
Motion
—,
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Set Hearing Date of January 1, 1994.
Info /Background:
The following proposed project has been reviewed by staff and NSP
and is considered feasible:
Location: Virginia Avenue and Virginia Lane
Improvement: L -37 Ornamental Street Lighting
Estimated Cost: $ 660.00
Staff would suggest possible hearing date of January 18, 1994.
Funding for Improvement No. L -37 would be from proposed assess-
ment.
A.
0 e �\
0
J • , ~�AnfM�" vO�
tads
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Susan Wohlrabe
Date: December 20, 1993
Subject: ANNUAL DINNER MEETING &
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION
Agenda Item # VTT . E. &. F.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: That dates be selected for the Council's Annual
Dinner Meeting in March and the Annual Volunteer
Recognition Reception in April.
Info /Background: NOTE: 1994 SPRING BREAK IS FROM MARCH 26TH THROUGH
APRIL 3RD, EASTER DAY. NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK
IS APRIL 17TH THROUGH APRIL 23RD.
The Annual Dinner Meeting was held this year on Wednesday, March 24th, 6:00 PM
at Centennial Lakes. It was suggested that we alternate years between Braemar
Clubhouse and Centennial Lakes. Based on availabilities, I would recommend
the following dates for consideration of the 1994 Annual Dinner Meeting,
depending on which site you want to select:
Tuesday, March 15, or Wednesday, March 16, at Braemar OR
Tuesday, March 22, or Wednesday, :larch 23, at Centennial Lakes
The Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception was held this year on Wednesday,
April 21st, 5:00 PM at Edinborough Parr:. I would recommend the following
dates for consideration of the 1994 event:
Tuesday, April 19, at Edinborough Park
or
Wednesday, April 20, at Edinborough Park
r - '
NOVEMBER HANDWRITTEN CHECKS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9
1993
01:21:45
Page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/02/93
$3,378.90
DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL PREMIUM
254059
CENT,SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
138583
$3,378.90*
11/02/93
$27,870.20
MEDICA CHOICE
110193
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
138584
$27,870.20*
11/01/93
$45,800.00
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVI
ARBITRAGE REBATE
100493
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
138585
$45,800.00*
11/01/93
$920'.00
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVI
ARBITRAGE REBATE
100493
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVICES
11/01/93
$3,080.00
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVI
ARBITRAGE REBATE
100493
ARENA ADMINIST.PROF
SERVICES
138586
$4,000.00*
11/01/93
$65,170.00
INTERNAL REVENUE.SERVI
ARBITRAGE REBATE
100493.
GENERAL STORM
PROF SERVICES
11/01/93
$27,930.00
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVI
ARBITRAGE REBATE
100493.
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
138587
$93,100.00*
11/01/93
$240.41
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER /PAINT
076010.
GC CIP
CIP
11/01/93
$63.46
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
075467.
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
11/01/93
- $107.31
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CREDIT
076013.
CLUB HOUSE
LUMBER
11/01/93
$13.83
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
075658.
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER -
11/01/93
$421.31
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
076333.
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
11/01/93
$360.65
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
076506.
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
11/01/93
$66.47
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PAINT
076554.
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
138588
$1,058.82*
11/05/93
- $189,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
NOV 5
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
11/05/93
$189,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
NOV 5
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
138590
S.00*
11/08/93
$19,692.82
FIDELITY BANK
FICA /MEDICARE
110593
GENERAL-FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYABL
138591
$19- ,692.82*
11/08/93
$19.62
PERA
PERA
110593
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
138592
$19.62*
11/08/93
$22,785.61
PERA
PERA
110593
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
138593
$22,785.61*
12/07/93
$205.95
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59405
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.06
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59405
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$504.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59406
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
-59406
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$308.79
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59407
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.09
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59407
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$67.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59408
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.68
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59408
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$54.69
-EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59409
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59409
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$339.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59502
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.39
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59502
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$367.44
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59401
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$151.11
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59503
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
i
Y
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45
Page 2
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
-$3.67
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
59401
59503
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$1.51
$330.85
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59402
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.31
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59402
59403
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$134.29
-$1.34
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
59403
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$531.43
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59404
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.31
EAGLE WINE
LI19931115
59404
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138594
$2,965.30"
12/07/93
$599.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69067
69041
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.20
$208.75
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69040
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$1,082.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69065
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$372.51
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69170
69170
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.45
$79.00
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69100
SOTH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$784.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69074
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
OF GD LIQU
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
$161.50
ED PHILLIPS &
PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69042
69042
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$3.23
$917.15
ED
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69178
69178
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
- $18.34
$402.20
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69043
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$110.18
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69041
69045
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$21.40
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69068
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$770.40
$1,440.24
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69179
VERNON SELLING'CST
OF GO LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,496.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69080
69179
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $28.80
$673.65
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
69081
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$42.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
68983
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$405.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
69044
69046
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$159.12
-$3.18
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931115
69046
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138595
$9,664.05"
12/07/93
- $39.25
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59601
59603
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$4,317.38
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931115
LI19931115
59603
VERNON SELLING,
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$86.35
$134.58
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119931115
59604
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
GD.LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,962.27
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931115
LI19931115
59601
59604
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$2.69
- $16.49
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
60197
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
$3,059.16
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
LI19931115
59605
59605
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $61.18
$85.60
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931115
59606
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI120T
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$.86
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59606
50TH ST, SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,937.74
- $58.75
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931115
LI19931115
59607
59607
50TH
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$184.89
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59608
59608
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$3.70
$4,253.83
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931115
LI19931115
59609
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $85.08
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59609
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
FOR HAND CHECKS Thu
Dec
9 1993
01:21:45
Page 3
CHECK NO DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
$3,827.61
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59610
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $76.55
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
59610
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
-$22.50
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931LIS
86496
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$824.72
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931115
60197
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
138596
$21,134.38"
12/07/93
-$.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1078716
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1078716
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
- $152.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1084144
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,502.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113646
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
5152.93
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113729
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113729
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.53
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113729
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$309.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1113737
50TH ST SELLIN
CST.OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,092.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113711
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$894.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113695
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$2,654.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113703
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$32.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113745
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$30.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112523
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112523
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$990.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112515
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112515
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-59.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112515
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$51.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112507
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112507
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112507
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$300.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112572
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112572
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112572
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$69.27
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112556
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931115
1112556
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112556
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,051.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112531
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112531
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 541.03
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112531
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.393.18
JOHNSON
WINE-CO.
LI19931115
1112549
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93.
$11.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112549
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 547.86
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1112549
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,713.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113653
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$13.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113653
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93
-$54.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113653
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$37.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113638
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113638
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $50.05
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113646
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$788.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113620
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$8.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113620
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113620
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113646
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$31.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113679
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $72.75
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1084151
YORK SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113679
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113679
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$746.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931115
1113661
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45 Page 4
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ' - VENDOR ---------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION -- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM -- OBJECT -- PO-NUM_-
- -- - - - - -- --------- - - - - --
138597
138598
138599
138600
- -------------- - -
- - -- -
12/07/93 $15.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19931115 1113661 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE LI1207
12/07/93 -$7.47 JOHNSON WINE CO. LI19931115 1113661 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS LI1207
$18,508.19*
12/07/93
$4.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931115
35987
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
$27.50
$145.50
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
35988
35987
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$118.00
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
35991
CM1027
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $42.00
$4.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931115
35991
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$300.00
$6.00
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19931115
LI19931115
35992
35992
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
$89.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931115
35993
50TH ST SELLIN
$652.50*
12/07/93
-$7.55
$111.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
-LI19931115
LI19931115
59031
59032
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$1.11
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931115
59032
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$755.47
$852.89
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931115
LI19931115
59031
59033
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
-$7.45
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931115
LI19931115
59035
59033
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$8.53
$60.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931115
59034
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
-$.60
$744.67
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931115
LI19931115
59034
59035
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$2,498.79*
12/07/93
$128.95
$3,360.51
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
135464
135531
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
$109.47
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135348
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
- $45.41
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
132827
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$3,172.24
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135462
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$1,414.77
$28.30
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
130895
130895
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-
$225.32
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
134014
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
-$4.51
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
134014
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
52,682.12
- $53.64
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
L119931115
LI19931115
135299
135299
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$279.24
-$5.58
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
134049
134049
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
$111.70
-$2.23
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
L119931115
135346
135346
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$51.50
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135460
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$.52
$1,924.10
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
135460
135457
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $38.48
$3,022.33
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
135457
135458
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
- $30.22
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135458
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
$1,888.58
$37.77
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931115
LI19931115
133023
133023
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-
$1,999.56
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135454
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
- $20.06
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931115
135454
YORK SELLING
$20,103.67*
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
CST OF GDS MIX LI1207
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
TRADE DISCOUNT LI1207
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
CST OF GD WINE LI1207
CST OF GDS BEE LI1207
CASH.DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS BEE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GO LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GO LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GDS MIX
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
L11207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LIL207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
L11207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec
9 1993
01:21:45
Page 5
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT---
-------- - - - - -- - - - - - --
- - - - -- VENDOR----------
-
- - - -- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - --
INVOICE - -
- - - --
- - -- PROGRAM
-----
OBJECT
- - - - -- ---- - - - -PO
-NUM.
- - --
12/07/93
$182.00
WORLD CLASS
WINES INC
LI19931115
34490
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.00
WORLD CLASS
WINES INC
LI19931115
34490
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138601
$184.00"
11/09/93
$6643.33
PERA
BALANCE DUE
110593
GENERAL
FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
138602
$6,,643.33"
11/09/93
$279.04
FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION
REFUND OF SALES TAX
110993
VERNON
LIQUOR
SALES TAX
138603
$279'.04"
11/15/93
$49.24
RETAIL DATA
SYS MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18383.
ARENA
BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
138604
$49.24"
11/15/93
$404.70
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
230769•
CITY
HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
11/15/93
$321.81
VOSS LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
231338*
ART CENTER
BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
138605
$726.51*
11/15/93
$706.00
DONALD SALVERDA
& ASSO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
P8665 -05
POLICE
DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
138606
$706.00*
12/07/93
-$12.49
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62160
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$543.60
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62161
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,248.95
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62160
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.44
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62161
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.33
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62164
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$130.24
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62162
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62162
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$703.94
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62163
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62163
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$532.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62164
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62165
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$728.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62167
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$454.66
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62165
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.29
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62167
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.90
EAGLE WINE
L119931116
62368
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$200.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62168
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.01
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62168
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$90.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19931116
62368
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138607
$4,587.19*
12/07/93
-$29.36
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71685
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$231.00
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71623
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.62
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71623
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$526.00
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71687
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$489.45
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71624
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1 234.87
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71686
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
1175.50
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71079
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$110.18
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71611
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.20
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71611
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$210.00
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71454
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$477.28
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71680
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$733.50
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19931116
71679
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
i
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec
9 1993
01:21:45
Page 6
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/07/93
S265.05
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71678
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.30
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71678
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$420.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116.
71610
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$312.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71070
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$ 1,288.31
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
7.1689
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$910.69
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71688
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $18.21
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119931116
71688
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,216.90
$614,.65
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931116
LI19931116
71690
71626
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$18'.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71627
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$303.59
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931116
LI19931116
71628
71628
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$6.07
$1,467.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71685
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$126.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931116
71458
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138608
$11,066.11•
12/07/93
-$1.11
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
61426
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$654.17
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62365
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD.LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $13.08
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62365"
62366
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$564.50
-$11.29
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931116
LI19931116
62366
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,097.79
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62367
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $41.96
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62367
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$447.61
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
LI19931116
62369
62369
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$8.95
$680.82
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931116
62370
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $13.62
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62370
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,191.15
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
L119931116
LI19931116
62371
62371
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $23.82
$5,783.06
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119931116
62372
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 5115.66
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
62372
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$111.45
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
61426
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
$65.20
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
63209
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.70
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
60881
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.30
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
63209
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $81.04
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931116
86852
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
- $83.40
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
&
LI19931116
LI19931116
86850
60881
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$85.16
GRIGGS COOPER
CO.
138609
$11,283.98'
12/07/93
$1.56
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1133024
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.66
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1133024
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$147.08
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143502
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$659.35
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143510
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.55
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1133016
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.08
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1133016
1133016
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$355.12
- $11.54
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19931117
LI19931117
1143478
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.08
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143478
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,154.16
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143478
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
OF GD LIQU
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
$3,741.97
$17.18
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19931117
LI19931117
1143981
1143981
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $74.84
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143981
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu
Dec
9 1993 01:21:45
Page 7
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
$953.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143411
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143411
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1143502
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU _LI1207
12/07/93
-$9.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143411
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1143502
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$79.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143403
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143403
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.79
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1143403
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1118728
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
L11207
12/07/93
$1,234.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1151489
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$9.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1151489
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $12.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1151489
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,981.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143494
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$7.02
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143494
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $39.63
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143494
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$266.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1133024
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.59
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143510
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$136.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143486
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1143486
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143486
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,276.65
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1151455
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$18.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1151455
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $12.77
JOHNSON
WINE
-CO.
LI19931117
1151455
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,790.82
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143973
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$19.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143973
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93
-$55.82
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143973
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,787.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143965
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE-LI1207
12/07/93
$22.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143965
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $27.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931117
1143965
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$923.06
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1144005
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$20.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1144005
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$9.23
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117.
1144005
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$31.60
'JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143957
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143957
YORK SELLING
CST OF GO WINE
L11207
12/07/93
-$.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143957
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$444.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1091248
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1091248
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
--$4.44
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1091248
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$479.99
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143999
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143999
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143999
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$649.13
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143452
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$12.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143452
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143452
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$21.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1140813
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1140821
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,622.53
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143437
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93
$11.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143437
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143510
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$52.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1143437
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$19.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1140805
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$443.90
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1135608
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931117
1135608
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45
Page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR----------
DESCRIPTION-- - -
- - -- INVOICE -
- - - -- PROGRAM
-- ----
OBJECT --- - - - -PO
- - - ---
NUM.
- - - - --
----------------------------------
12/07/93
-54.44
- - - - -- -
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
- - - - --
LI19931117
1135608
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,779.87
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931117
1143429
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
L119931117
1143429
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93
- $35.60
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931117
1143429
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$445.50
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931117
1143445
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$.26
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
LI19931117
LI19931117
1143445
1143445
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$4.46
$765.61
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
L119931117
1151463
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$11.44
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931117
1151463
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-57.66
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931117
1151463
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138610
$25,926.42"
12/07/93
$4.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931116
36201
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$19.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931116
36202
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$493.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931116
36203
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$10.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119931116
36203
36201
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$193.00
$273.50
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19931116
LI19931116
36204
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931116
36302
36204
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
L11207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$5.00
$58.00
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
L119931116
L119931116
36232
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$116.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931116
36302
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138611
$1,175.90"
12/07/93
$1,132.42
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119931116
61723
61723
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $11.32
-$7.92
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931116
LI19931116
61724
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,477.16
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119931116
LI19931116
61725
61724
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$791.90
- $14.77
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931116
61725
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138612
$3,367.47A
12/07/93
-$17.08
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931116
136710
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
L11207
12/07/93
$171.32
-$3.43
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
LI19931116
129702
129702
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$8.54
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931116
136721
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$5,314.35
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
LI19931116
137372
137372
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $53:14
$250.52
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931116
137618
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.01
QUALITY
WINE
L119931116
137618
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $73.03
QUALITY
WINE
L119931116
LI19931116
137353
136707
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $17.08
$245.75
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
129704
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.92
QUALITY
WINE
L119931116
129704
137330
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$398.05
-$7.96
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
LI19931116
137330
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,213.75
QUALITY
WINE
L119931116
LI19931116
137356
137356
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
L11207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $44.28
$26.20
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
137357
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
L11207
12/07/93
-$.26
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931116
137357
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$264.30
-$5.29
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931116
LI19931116
137329
137329
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$3,359.70
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931116
137401
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993
01:21:45
Page 9
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
- $33.60
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137401
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,904.43
QUALITY WINE
L119931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $19.04
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
- $1,904.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$19.04
QUALITY WINE
L119931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN.CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,904.44
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $19.04
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137398
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$3,651.26
QUALITY WINE
LI19931116
137353
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
138613
$17,506,.98"
12/07/93
$184.00
THE WINE COMPANY
L119931116
2856
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE"
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19931116
2850
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.75
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19931116
2856
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$300.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19931116
2850
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138614
$492.75"
12/07/93
$119.90
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
L119931117
34697
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19931117
34697
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
L11207
138615
$121.901,
11/17/93
$434.00
FIDELITY BANK
ELECTION PAYROLL
111593
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYABL
138616
$434.00"
11/19/93
$312,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
111993
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
11/19/93
- $312,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
111993
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
138617
$.00'
11/23/93
$29,744.13
PERA
PERA
111993
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
138618
$29,744.13"
11/23/93
$19.62
PERA
PERA
111993
GENERAL FD -PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
138619
$19.62"
11/23/93
$19,571.89
FIDELITY BANK
FICA /MEDICARE
111993"
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL PAYABL
138620
$19,571.89"
12/07/93
$725.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64510
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.26
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64510
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
550.46
EAGLE WINE
L119931206
64511
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
L11207
12/07/93
-$.50
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64511
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,208.68
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64512
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$12.09
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64512
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$171.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64514
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.72
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64514
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,333.41
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64515
YORK SELLING
-CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- 513.33
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64515
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$726.90
EAGLE WINE.
LI19931206
64518
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-57.27
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64518
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$54.12
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64519
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.54
EAGLE WINE
L119931206
64519
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$22.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64520
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,834.16
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64508
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.23
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
64520
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
4
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45 Page 10
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -- DESCRIPTION -- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT---- - - - -PO NUM.
----------------------- ----- ----- --- ----------- - - - - -- - - - --
138621
138622
12/07/93 - $18.34 EAGLE WINE
$6,066.75"
LI19931206 64508 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS LI1207
12/07/93
- $10.65
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74131
74131
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
$532.43
-$3.18
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
74011.
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$158.93
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
74011
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$725.00
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74010
74111
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
$1,512.50
$304.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
L119931206
71082
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$1,185.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74132
74014
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$7.97
$398.38
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
74014
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$653.80
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
74114
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$1,363.29
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74137
74013
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$122.40
$382.20
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
74015
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$21.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74016
74136
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$1,169.91
- $23.40
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
74136
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
-$3.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206.
74020
74018
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$122.40
$39.15
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
.74019
VERNON SELLING
12/.07/93
$150.00
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74020
74021
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$1,165.00
$1,878.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
74115
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
$1,563.14
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
74138
74138
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $31.26
$2,005.70
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
74139
VERNON SELLING
$15,373.12"
12/07/93
- $49.53
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
65068
65069
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$3,950.84
- $79.02
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO-
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
65069
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
$407.99
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
CO.
L119931206
LI19931206
65070
65070
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$8.16
$1,430.64
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
&
& CO.
LI19931206
65071
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
- $28.61
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
65071
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$1,422.87
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
65072
65072
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
- $28.46
$15.60
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
65073
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$.31
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
65073
50TH ST SELLIN
12/07/93
$4,937.62
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
L119931206
65074
65074
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $98.75
$154.25
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
65075
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
-$3.09
GRIGGS COOPER
COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
65075
65076
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
$5,082.98
- $101.66
GRIGGS
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
65076
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
$283.35
GRIGGS COOPER
COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
65077
65077
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$5.67
$88.77
GRIGGS
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
64172
64172
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$1.78
$304.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
66732
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS BEE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS MIX
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GO LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GO LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
L11207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45
Page 11
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
. VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
-$6.08
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931200
66732
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2 476.35
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
65068
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
1228.00
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
66733
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.56
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
66733
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138623
$20,367.58"
12/07/93
-$.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175322
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,112.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1177302
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1177302"
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
31.12
$2 0.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1183896
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1183896
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.31
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1183896
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $29.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1117894
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$62.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1117894
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $14.55
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
6189
YORK SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$4,323.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1175348
1175348
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD LIQU
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$23.23
- $86.46
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19931206
1175348
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,498.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175314
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$17.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175314
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $14.99
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175314
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$110.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175306
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175306
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175306
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$295.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175355
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175355
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
-$2.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175355
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,684.45
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175330
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$18.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175330
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $53.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931206
1175330
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$97.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175322
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
$297.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
5355
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
5355
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,165.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175405
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF OD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,851.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175413
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$376.07
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175439
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$32.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175371
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$610.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175389
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$68.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175421
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$23.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175397
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175462
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175462
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$221.27
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175496
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175496
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175496
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
5546.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175504
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,918.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1117894
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175504
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
5355
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175504
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$94.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175447
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175447
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1175447
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45
Page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT-
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
------------------
--
12/07/93
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,456.13
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931206
1175454
1175454
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$20.28
- $14.56
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
L119931206
LI19931206
1175454
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,639.45
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
L119931206
1175470
YORK
SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD LIQU
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.60
- $52.79
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1175470
1175470
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$5,025.96
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931206
1175488
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$29.21
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1175488
1175488
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$100.52
$1,123.70
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
LI19931206
1151471
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$15.60
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1151471
1151471
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
- $11.24
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
138624
$29,637.28"
12/07/93
$39.00
PAUSTIS
.& SONS
LI19931206
36395
36391
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GDS BEE
OF GO WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$10.40
$58.50
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
L119931206
LI19931206
36392
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$438.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119931206
36391
36393
50TH
YORK
ST SELLIN
SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$247.00
$7.20
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19931206
L119931206
36394
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$453.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36394
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36393
YORK
SELLING
138625
$1,258.10"
12/07/93
- $11.12
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
64509
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$501.76
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
64513
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.02
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
64513
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,570.26
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
64516
64516.
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$15.70
$111.00
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER &
COOPER &
CO.
CO.
LI19931206
64517
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
-51.11
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
L119931206
64517
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$750.00
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
L119931206
65890
65890
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$7.50
$1,111.78
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER &
COOPER &
CO.
CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
64509
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
5525.00
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
65891,
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$11.25
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
65892
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.25
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
L119931206
65891
65892
50TH
YORK
ST SELLIN
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,125.00
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19931206
138626
$5,637.85*
12/07/93
$489.90
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
139509
139562
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD LIQU
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$3,935.53
- $78.71
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
139562
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$87.50
QUALITY
WINE
L119931206
139144
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$720.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
139593
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.20
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
139593
137358
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$836.93
-$16.74
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
137358
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,243.34
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
139143
139143
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- 322.43
$1,440.79
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19931206
139145
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF, GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $14.41
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
139145
139508
50TH
YORK
ST SELLIN
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
L11207
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,535.55
QUALITY
WINE
LI19931206
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993
01:21:45
Page 13
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
- $30.71
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139508
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- 536.60
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139042
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.65
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139561
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$172.46
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139588
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
$360.00
-$3.60
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
139592
139592
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$720.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139594
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$7.20
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139594
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,718.21-
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139702
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $54'.36
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139702
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,310.61
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139703
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 826.21
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139703
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$277.10
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139896
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.77
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139896
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $18.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
135623
YORK
SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
- $19.88
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
135629
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
1.2/07/93
-85.70
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
136074
_YORK
SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
- $18.50
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
138630
YORK
SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$270.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140162
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.70
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140162
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$3,659.53
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
139042
139509
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$9.80
$64.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
139561
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
138627
$20,465.96"
12/07/93
$3.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
3032
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$80.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
3032
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138628
$83.00"
12/07/93
$3.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19931206
34846
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $14.01
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19931206
34846
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$441.02
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19931206
34846
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
138629
$430.01"
11/29/93
$133.65
HUBER, GARY
112993
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
138630
$133.65*
12/07/93
-$7.07
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67658
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,079.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67659
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $10.79
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67659
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$39.92
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67660
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU_
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.40
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67660
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$707.12
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67658
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$314.45
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67661
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67664
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
- $3.14
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67661
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$263.25
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67662
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$2.63
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67662
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$503.80
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67663
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.04
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
67663
YORK
SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$179.75
EAGLE WINE
LI19931206
.67664
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138631
$3,056.72"
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec
9 1993
01:21:45
Page 14
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM ----
OBJECT
-
--------
PO NUM.
- -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
$33.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
75615
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
31,482.90
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76193
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
3565.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76308
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-56.31
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76262
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$107.20
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76547
50TH ST•SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$921.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76163
76237
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$583.53
$103.75
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76295
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF-
GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$40.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76294
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$57.15
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76256
76256
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CASH
OF
DISCOUNTS
GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$1.14
$264.15
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
L119931206
76293
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$4.34
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
75503
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
L11207
12/07/93
$168.94
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76010
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$544.70
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76189
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$970.77
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76244
76305
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$75.80
$325.80
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
76304
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$315.43
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76262
76306
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$1.81
$246.74
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76311
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.93
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76311
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$90.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76306
76264
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD LIQU
GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$730.14
$24.00
ED PHILLIPS &
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76310
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
LI1207
12/07/93
- $14.60
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76264
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
31,400.46
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
76245
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
3260.02
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
76011
76309
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GDS MIX
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$21.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
138632
$9,309.73"
12/07/93
-$6.07
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
58080
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$303.40
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
58080
67245
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$155.70
- $21.74
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
67845
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$3.11
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
67245
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,946.68
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
67834
67834
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $38.93
33,561.68
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119931206
67838
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 371.23
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
67838
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$170.70
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
67839
67839
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF
DISCOUNTS
GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$3.41
$547.07
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931-206
67840
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $10.94
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
67840
67842
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$1,222.41
- $24.45
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
& CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
67842
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,086.94
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19931206
67845 '
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI1207
138633
$8,814.70"
12/07/93
$3.64
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194315
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.22
JOHNSON WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194315
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
L11207
12/07/93
$554.42
JOHNSON WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1194323
1194323
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.72
JOHNSON
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec
9 1993
01:21:45
Page 15
CHECK NO DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
-$5.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931206
1194323
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$258.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194331
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$422.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194315
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194331
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$695.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194273
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194331
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,366.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194349
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194349
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- 527.34
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194349
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L11207
12/07/93
$423.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194356
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$8.84
-$4.24
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19931206
LI19931206
1194356
1194356
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$94.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931206
1200559
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1200559
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$901.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194414
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194414
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $18.03
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194414
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$523.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194406
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194406
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $10.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194406
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$522.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194398
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$6.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119931206
1194398
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194398
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$198.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194380
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194380
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$1.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194380
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$655.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194422
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194422
YORK SELLING
CASH
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.55
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194422
YORK SELLING
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,859.63
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194299
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
$14.82
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194299
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $57.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194299
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,083.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194307
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$21.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194307
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $10.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194307
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$431.35
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194265
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194265
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$4.31
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194265
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.95
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194273
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$7..80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194273
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,270.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194281
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
6171
VERNON SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI1207
12/07/93
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194281
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
- $25.41
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19931206
1194281
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI1207
138634
$12,180.88'
12/07/93
$219.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36558
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119931206
36558
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$.80
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36601
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$19.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36559
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS BEE
LI1207
12/07/93
$236.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
36560
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$6.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19931206
LI19931206
36560
36561
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$172.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:21:45
Page 16
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
---- -----
OBJECT
--------
PO NUM.
-
-------•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/07/93
$5.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19931206
36561
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
$21.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19931206
36601
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
138635
3685.70"
12/07/93
-$1.20
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
67835
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,301.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
LI19931206
67836
67836
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $13.02
$503.70
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
LI19931206
67837
67837
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$5.04
$563.99
PRIOR �INE COMPANY
PRIOR INE COMPANY
LI19931206
67841
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.64
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
67841
67843
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$546.72
-$5.47
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
LIL9931206
67843
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$120.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
67835
67844
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$87.00
-$.87
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19931206
LI19931206
67844
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
138636
$3,091.67"
12/07/93
-$5.09
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140833
140834
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$609.25
- $12.19
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140834
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$255.70
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140835
140835
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
-$5.11
$278.84
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140882
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$5.58
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140882
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
GO LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,419.75
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140884
140884
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST OF
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $28.40
$3,019.74
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140888
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
OF GD LIQU
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$254.40
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140833
140888
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
-$60.39
-$6.10
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140955
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
$1,908.15
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140901
140901
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $19.08
$5,371.72
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140925
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
- $53.72
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140925
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
$2,038.94
QUALITY WINE
WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140942
140942
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
- $20.39
$609.62
QUALITY
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140955
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI1207
12/07/93
-$6.10
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140955
140955
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST -OF GD WINE
LI1207
LI1207
12/07/93
- $609.62
$6.10
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
LI19931206
140955
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI1207
12/07/93
12/07/93
$609.64.
QUALITY WINE
LI19931206
140955
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO WINE
LI1207
138637
$15,550.08"
%
$579,262.09
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS Thu Dec 9 1993 01:24:13
Page 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
# 10
GENERAL FUND
$178,063.72
FUND
# 23
ART CENTER
$321.81
FUND
# 27
GOLF COURSE
$1,053.10
FUND
# 28
ICE ARENA
$3,195.71
FUND
# 40
UTILITY FUND
$27,930.00
FUND
# 41
STORM SEWER
$65,170.00
FUND
# 50
LIQUOR FUND
$303,527.75
$579,262.09
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 1
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$341.91
3M CO
LETTERING
TP72519
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
1558
141830
$341.91*
12/20/93
$38.99
A.A. BATTERY COMPANY
BATTERY
51084
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1987
141831
$38.99*
12/20/93
$885.64
AAA
LICENSES
120793
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
12/20/93
$4,042.62
AAA
LICENSES
120793
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
141832
$4,928.26*
12/20/93
$119.31
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$64.15
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$36.75
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$434.47
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$328.86
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$27.40
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
GUN RANGE
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$54.47
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
GOLF DOME
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$465.98
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$12.66
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$285.87
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$54.81
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$465.97
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$137.59
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH REMOVA
12/20/93
$109.62
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL
S RUBBISH REMOVAL
120193
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH REMOVA
141833
$2,597.91*
12/20/93
$29.90
AARRESTAD, DRU
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141834
$29.90*
12/20/93
$621.74
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
SWEEPER PARTS
022806
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
141835
$621.74*
12/20/93
$334.94
ACT ELECTRONICS INC
TRAFFIC COUNTER REPA
2653
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1713
12/20/93
$285.42
ACT ELECTRONICS INC
TRAFFIC COUNTER REPA
2654
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1714
141836
$620.36*
12/20/93
$60.00
AEC ENG /DESIGNERS
PROF ENG SERV
7141
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
141837
$60.00*
12/20/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
12/20/93
$174.04
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
12/20/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
FINANCE
EQUIP RENTAL
12/20/93
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
COMMUNICATIONS
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$10.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
PW BUILDING
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$30.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
6713843
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
141838
$229.04*
12/20/93
$5.20
ALBINSON
BLUEPRINTING
269319
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
8395
141839
$5.20*
12/20/93
$69.23
ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
21761388
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
141840
$69.23*
a
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$134.39
ALLIED PLASTICS
CLEAR PLEXI
38530
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1576
141841
$134.39*
12/20/93
$107.57
ALPHAGRAPHICS
PRINTING
19255
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
2012
141842
$107.57*
12/20/93
$122.48
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
PLOWMOTOR
21152
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1633
12/20/93
$59.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
STARTER
21154
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1640
12/20/93
- 841.54
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
CREDIT
21069
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$97.61
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
SOLENOID /REPAIR KIT
18952
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1480
141843
$238.35*
12/20/93
$105.86
AMERICAN BUSINESS FORM
PRINTING
349325
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
1780
141844
$105.86*
12/20/93
$36.64
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
GRILL
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$11.73
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$265.02
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$47.34
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$69.42
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$198.58.
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$61.17
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
113093
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
141845
$689.90*
12/20/93
$60.00
AMES, FAYETTE
CLASS REFUND
120893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
141846
$60.00*
12/20/93
$1,038.11
ANCHOR PAPER
PAPER
76395101
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI.
141847
$1,038.11*
12/20/93
$130.00
ANDERSON, DANIEL
SNOW REMOVAL
126
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
1910
141848
$130.00*
12/20/93
$16,680.00
ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOL
ADA ARCHITECT
112993
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
141849
$16,680.00*
12/20/93
$63.96
ARROYO TIRE COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
57210
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
1785
141850
$63.96*
12/20/93
$1,450.00
ARTISTIC FLOORS
NEW FLOORS
120793
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
141851
$1,450.00*
12/20/93
$156.00
ASIAN PAGES
HELP WANTED ADS
1219324
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
141852
$156.00*
12/20/93
$10,186.73
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
AIR COMP
E27387
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
141853
$10,186.73*
12/20/93
$28.89
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
52058475
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
141854
$28.89*
12/20/93
$14.22
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS
TELEPHONE
112593
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$14.62
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS
TELEPHONE
112693
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
. 1
y
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 3
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
141855
$28.84*
12/20/93
$36.81
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111893
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
141856
$36.81*
12/20/93
$163.65
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
71273.05
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1577
141857
$163.65*
12/20/93
$53.03
AUTOMOTIVE MACHINE SPE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
48130
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1903
12/20/93
$1,059.67
AUTOMOTIVE MACHINE SPE
REPAIR ZAMBONI
62531
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
141858
$1,112.70*
12/20/93
$249.02
AUTOMOTIVE WHOLESALE I
SPRING /CONVERTER
131789
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1619
141859
$249.02*
12/20/93
$650.39
AVR INC
CONCRETE
99807
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$209.38
AVR INC
CONCRETE
1104
GENERAL STORM
FILL MATERIALS
141860
$859.77*
12/20/93
$31.90
AWD COOLERS OF MINNESO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
58395
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI
141861
$31.90*
12/20/93
$298.94
BAKER POOLS
LANE MARKER ANCHORS
37431
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2010
141862
$298.94*
12/20/93
$68.60
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
REPAIR PARTS
288096
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$47.77
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
LIGHT
287080
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$25.95
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
BATTERY
286466
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$149.37
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
ANTI - FREEZE
284108
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1474
12/20/93
$101.60
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
WIPER BLADES
285792
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1627
12/20/93
$149.10
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
WIPER BLADE
285420
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1574
12/20/93
$106.71
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOU
BEAM
287699
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1752
141863
$649.10*
12/20/93
$700.00
BCA TRAINING
CONT ED /POLICE
120893
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
141864
$700.00*
12/20/93
$22.50
BECKER, JANET
REFUND
121093
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
141865
$22.50*
12/20/93
$281.90
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
49087
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
141866
$281.90*
12/20/93
$100.80
BENN, BRADLEY
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141867
$100.80*
12/20/93
$160.00
BENNETT, KATHRYN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141868
$160.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
BENNETT, WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141869
$100.00*
12/20/93
$64.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
220042
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 15
1993 01:52:40
Page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$59.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
223083
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
141870
$124.00*
12/20/93
$477.80
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
120893/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/20/93
$345.70
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
120893/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/20/93
$223.10
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
120893/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO LIQU
141871
$1,046.60*
12/20/93
$359.97
BERNARD J. MULCAHY CO
BOOSTER /FLANGES
110125
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
1454
141872
$359.97*
12/20/93
$56.15
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
567000
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$59.56
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
566980
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$44.64
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
560760
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$8.50
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
560761
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$253.73
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
566980
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$19.60
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
547731
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$22.50
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
595850
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$75.69
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
595850
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$37.30
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
583240
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
12/20/93
$87.45
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
591640
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$271.79
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
590020
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
141873
$936.91*
12/20/93
$57.78
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
REPAIR DOOR LOCK
47030
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
1781
141874
$57.78*
12/20/93
$4,886.91
BFI OF MN INC
REFUSE
93110010
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
141875
$4,886.91*
12/20/93
$37,998.36
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING SERVICE CO
93110070
RECYCLING
EQUIP RENTAL
141876
$37,998.36*
12/20/93
$3,699.97
BJORKS COUNTRY STONE
LANNON STONE
111993
RETAINING WALL
LUMBER
141877
$3,699.97*
12/20/93
$21.00
BLAINE HEATING & AIR C
REIMBURSEMENT
120893
GENERAL FD PRO
MECHAN PERMITS
141878
$21.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141879
$100.00*
12/20/93
$97.98
BLOOMINGTON LINOLEUM &
REPAIR PARTS
12256
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
141880
$97.98*
12/20/93
$114.50
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
270143
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1624
12/20/93
$90.01
BOYER TRUCKS
LATCH /CONTROL
270954
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1647
12/20/93
$18.45
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
270129
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$59.31
BOYER TRUCKS
REST PARTS
272105
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$127.05
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
270756
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
141881
$409.32*
12/20/93
$199.08
BRAEMAR PRINTING
PRINTING
41597
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
1779
9
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 5
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
141882
$199.08*
12/20/93
$116.35
BROCKWAY, MAUREEN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141883
$116.35*
12/20/93
$2,925.00
BUCKHORN INC
RECYCLING CONTAINERS
155016
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
141884
$2,925.00*
12/20/93
$16.79
BUIE, BARBARA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121393
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$56.00
BUIE, BARBARA
MEETING EXPENSE
121393
CENTENNIAL LAK
MEETING EXPENS
141885
$72.79*
12/20/93
$70.85
BUIE, SUSIE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141886
$70.85*
12/20/93
450.99
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14450969
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
141887
$50.99 *.
12/20/93
$260.00
BURNS, STEVE
SCORER /HOCKEY PREVIE
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
141888
$260.00*
12/20/93
$25.00
BURNSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
PRINTING SCHEDULES
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
141889
$25.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141890
$100.00*
12/20/93
$84.64
CALC TYPE OFFICE EQUIP
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
047084
GOLF ADMINISTR
SVC CONTR EQUI
1780
141891
$84.64*
12/20/93
$40.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121493
FINANCE
MILEAGE
141892
$40.00*
12/20/93
$154.30
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
CAP19373
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8009
12/20/93
$173.41
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
E -82 RADIO SERVICE
CAP18764
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
8009
141893
$327.71*
12/20/93
$153.81
CATCO
HYD CYL
331372
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
12/20/93
$134.28
CATCO
CORE
330052
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1478
12/20/93
$225.52
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
330899
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
141894
$513.61*
12/20/93
$88.25
CELLULAR ONE
CAR PHONE
112293/K
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
12/20/93
$176.93
CELLULAR ONE
CAR PHONE
113093/P
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$58.85
CELLULAR ONE
PHONE AIR TIME
112293/P
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$10.92
CELLULAR ONE
CELL PHONE
113093
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$10.92
CELLULAR ONE
CELL PHONE
113093
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$21.45
CELLULAR ONE
CELL PHONE
113093
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
141895
$367.32*
12/20/93
$70.55
CENTRAIRIE INC
REIMBURSEMENT
120293
GENERAL FD PRO
PLUMBING PERMI
141896
$70.55*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
-----------------------------------------------7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$396.98
CERTIFIED HYDRAULIC SP
HYD VALVES,
152749
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1549
141897
$396.98*
12/20/93
$75.00
CHRISTIANSON, LINDA
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
141898
$75.00*
12/20/93
$96.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
76021
YORK SELLING .
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$64.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
76015
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
141899
$160.00*
12/20/93
$902.63
CITY OF RICHFIELD
POWER & LIGHT
113093
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT & POWER
141900
$902.63*
12/20/93
$195.00
CITY OF ST. PAUL
CONT ED /POLICE
120893
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
141901
$195.00*
12/20/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
50440
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
50438
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
50439
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
141902
$40.50*
12/20/93
$1,328.13
CLASSIC LAKE CONFERENC
CLASSIC LAKE % /PREVI
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
141903
$1,328.13*
12/20/93
$553.45
CLASSIC SPORTING ARMS
AMMO
1380
GUN RANGE
AMMUNITION
141904
$553.45*
12/20/93
$24.72
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
146786
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
141905
$24.72*
12/20/93
$404.70
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE B
REMODELING
9173
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
1985
141906
$404.70*
12/20/93
$319.50
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VER EQ
113093
YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$319.50
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VER EQ
113093
50TH ST SELLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1858
12/20/93
$692.25
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VER EQ
113093
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
141907
$1,331.25*
12/20/93
$104.32
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
COMPUTER PROGRAM
347724
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1209
141908
$104.32*
12/20/93
$79.13
CONTACT MOBILE COMM
RADIO SERVICE
28203
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
141909
$79.13*
12/20/93
$115.00
CONTINENTAL CLAY CO
CRAFT SUPPLIES
011760
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
1148
141910
$115.00*
12/20/93
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J
MEDICAL SERVICES
DECEMBER
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
141911
$1,386.67*
12/20/93
$28.40
CULLIGAN
SOFT WATER SERVICE
113093
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICES
141912
$28.40*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 7
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$82.56
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
LAB SUPPLIES
2610080
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
1797
12/20/93
$55.21
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
LAB SUPPLIES
2600817
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
1797
12/20/93
$314.05
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
LAB SUPPLIES
2595502
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
141913
$451.82*
12/20/93
$49.50
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
URINAL REPAIR
2196
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$209.00
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
PUMP TANK AT ARNESON
2407
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
1723
141914
$258.50*
12/20/93
$10.64
DALEN, LINDA
MILEAGE
121393
FINANCE
MILEAGE
141915
$10.64*
12/20/93
$35.10
DARNELL, EILEEN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141916
$35.10*
12/20/93
$124.29
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
45714
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
1890
141917
$124.29*
12/20/93
$64.65
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
02453
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$179.02
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
02449
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1315
12/20/93
$52.14
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
02471
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1422
12/20/93
$86.45
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
02562
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1410
12/20/93
$98.19
DAYSTARTER
BATTERY
02485
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1538
141918
$480.45*
12/20/93
$300.00
DEMUTH, DAN
SERVICES /JR GOLF
120293
GOLF ADMINISTR
PROF SERVICES
141919
$300.00*
12/20/93
$75.00
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
PERMIT
121393
WEED CONTROL
PROF SERVICES
141920
$75.00*
12/20/93
$240.00
DESHLER, BRANDON
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
120393
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
141921
$240.00*
12/20/93
$21.00
DICKER, TOBIE
CRAFT SUPPLIES
121493
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
12/20/93
$81.25
DICKER, TOBIE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141922
$102.25*
12/20/93
$125.00
DIETRICHSON, BILL
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
141923
$125.00*
12/20/93
$487.77
DISPATCH COMM /MN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
111186
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$487.77
DISPATCH COMM /MN
MOBILE
110875
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
12/20/93
$39.00
DISPATCH COMM /MN
RADIO SERVICE
111061
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
141924
$1,014.54*
12/20/93
$99.76
DORFNER, MARK
SUPPLIES FOR FISH TA
120793
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
141925
$99.76*
12/20/93
$88.76
DORNSEIF, DAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121493
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
141926
$88.76*
12/20/93
$1,489.43
DPC INDUSTRIES
WATER CHEMICALS
01000970
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU
6915
0
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
141927
$1,489.43*
12/20/93
$320.00
DVORAK, MARY
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141928
$320.00*
12/20/93
$70.03
EAGLE ELEVATOR
DECEMBER MAINT
8558
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$70.03
EAGLE ELEVATOR
OCTOBER MAINT
8077
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
141929
$140.06*
12/20/93
$606.80
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
297030
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$60.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
297570
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$225.10
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
296978
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$3,911.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
296979
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$17.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
120193/G
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$2,330.75
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
294045
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$51.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
294045
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$543.85
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
294044
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$137.10
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
294110
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$671.95
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
294109
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
141930
$8,555.05*
12/20/93
$106.50
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
2515468
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
1913
12/20/93
$90.53
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
2515472
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
1913
141931
$197.03*
12/20/93
$288.45
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
41481
BUILDING MAINT
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$560.74
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
42021
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$561.63
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
42523
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$227.52
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
MATERIAL
41779
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$282.04
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIALS
42280
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIALS
141932
$1,920.38*
12/20/93
$26.45
EDINA ART CENTER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121493
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
141933
$26.45*
4
12/20/93
$3,061.88
EDINA CAR WASH
CAR WASH
121493
EQUIPMENT OPER
CAR WASH.
141934
$3,061.88*
12/20/93
$190.00
EDINA SENIORS
POSTAGE
120693
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
141935
$190.00*
12/20/93
$79.88
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
FOUNDATION LEDGER SW
5113051
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIP REPLACEM
1768
12/20/93
$134.20
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
MOUSE & SOFTWARE
5431854
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1984
12/20/93
$286.50
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
SW COST
5125051
PARK ADMIN.
EQUIP REPLACEM
1844
12/20/93
$45.79
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
SW COST
5125051
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1844
12/20/93
$45.80
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
SW COST
5125051
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
1844
12/20/93
$45.79
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
SW COST
5125051
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1844
12/20/93
$244.33
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
UPGRADE SW
4965450
FINANCE
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/20/93
$105.00
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTW
UPGRADE SW
4965450
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIP REPLACEM
141936
$987.29*
12/20/93
$37.04
EIDEM, KRIS
CONT ED /POLICE
121493
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
141937
$37.04*
u
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993
01:52:40
Page 9
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
12/20/93
$95.55
EILERS, JOYCE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141938
$95.55*
12/20/93
$60.00
EMOND,
NANCY
SERVICES /ADAPTIVE RE
121093
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
141939
$60.00*
12/20/93
$75.00
ERICKSON, GARY
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
141940
$75.00*
12/20/93
$16.43
FARBER, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES /EDI
121393
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
141941
$16.43*
12/20/93
$3,883.00
FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISE
FENCING
93 -00453
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
141942
$3,883.00*
12/20/93
$418,558.75
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST /EDINB
23833255
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
12/20/93
$35,350.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST
83325016
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BONDS
12/20/93
$100,000.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
83325016
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/20/93
$19,175.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
23833255
ICE ARENA PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/20/93
$5,825.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
23833255
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/20/93
$300,000.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
101893/1
IBR #2 PROG
BOND PRINCIPLE
12/20/93
$20,172.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST
23833255
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BONDS
12/20/93
$13,125.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST
101893/1
IBR #2 PROG
INTEREST BONDS
12/20/93
$66,403.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST
23833255
ARENA ADMINIST
INTEREST BONDS
12/20/93
$70,201.25
FIRST
TRUST
BOND INTEREST
23833255
GOLF ADMINISTR
INTEREST BONDS
12/20/93
$70,000.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
23833255
GOLF PROG
BONDS PAYABLE
12/20/93
$170,000.00
FIRST
TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL /EDINB
23833255
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
141943
$1,288,810.00*
12/20/93
$275.00
FISCHER,
FRANK
TRAINER /PREVIEW
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
141944
$275.00*
12/20/93
$127.50
FLAHERTY'S
HAPPY TYME
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
2255
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
141945
$127.50*
12/20/93
$34.94
FLANDERS,
PAT
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141946
$34.94*
12/20/93
$13.42
FLASH
FOTO II
PHOTOGRAPHS
19490
PARK ADMIN.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
141947
$13.42*
12/20/93
$412.40
FRAME,
SUSAN
COST OF GOODS SOLD
121493
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
12/20/93
$586.00
FRAME,
SUSAN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141948
$998.40*
12/20/93
$774.26
FRONT
LINE PLUS FIRE &
TURN OUT GEAR
3056
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM 1069
141949
$774.26*
12/20/93
$136.56
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112993
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$271.42
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$735.48
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$294.11
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$528.60
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$99.56
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
12/20/93
$265.15
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
112693/P
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
12/20/93
$90.21
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
112693/P
DISTRIBUTION
LAUNDRY
141950
$2,421.09*
12/20/93
$480.00.
G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC
PROF SERV
121093
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
141951
$480.00*
12/20/93
$18.11
GARDNER HARDWARE
HOSE ADAPTER
19659
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
1625
141952
$18.11*
12/20/93
$27.30
GARRISON, JUDY
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141953
$27.30*
12/20/93
$51.10
GARVEN GREETINGS INC
GIFT BAGS
100783
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
141954
$51.10*
12/20/93
$300.00
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
141955
$300.00*
12/20/93
$38.00
GEM TAP SERVICE.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
113093
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
141956
$38.00*
12/20/93
$24.00
GILLE, SHARON
REFUND /ART CENTER
121493
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
141957
$24.00*
12/20/93
$50.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVIC
PIANO TUNING
931208
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
141958
$50.00*
12/20/93
$70.20
GOLDBERG, CAROL
ART CENTER SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141959
$70.20*
12/20/93
$454.50
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
GOPHER ONE SERVICE
3100225
SUPERV. & OVRH
GOPHER STATE
141960
$454.50*
12/20/93
$239.63
GRAFIX SHOPPE
LETTERING
8605
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
141961
$239.63*
12/20/93
$37.31
GRAUSAM, STEVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121193
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$4.99
GRAUSAM, STEVE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
121193
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PROF SERVICES
141962
$42.30*
12/20/93
$245.99
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
MISC ELEC
50059807
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
1621
12/20/93
$308.45
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
LATCH DUCT /COUPLING
50059711
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
1486
12/20/93
$117.00
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
FUSE
10479245
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
1556
141963
$671.44*
12/20/93
$103.22
GRIMSBY, NAN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141964
$103.22*
12/20/93
$41.60-
GRINDELAND, KEN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141965
$41.60*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page it
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$305.37
GROTH MUSIC
MUSIC
083193
SPECIAL ACTIVI
MUSIC SUPPLIES
141966
$305.37*
12/20/93
$66.90
GS DIRECT
BLUEPRINT PAPER
39751
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1907
141967
$66.90*
12/20/93
$830.70
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
LUBRICANTS
257002
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
12/20/93
$71.89
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
OIL
256150
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1451
141968
$902.59*
12/20/93
$31.85
HANLON, NORMA
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141969
$31.85*
12/20/93
$480.76
HANS ROSACKER CO
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
12391
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
1600
141970
5480.76*
12/20/93
$23.83
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMEN
REPAIR PARTS
190550
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1650
12/20/93
$24.76
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMEN
REPAIR PARTS
C11413
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1650
141971
$48.59*
12/20/93
$53.30
HEALY, BONALYN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141972
$53.30*
12/20/93
$1,580.00
HEIDER ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC UPGRADE
113093
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
141973
$1,580.00*
12/20/93
$81.25
HEIKENS, LEE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141974
$81.25*
12/20/93
$217.68
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUN
EQUIP EXCHANGE COST
073093
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
141975
$217.68*
12/20/93
$58.50
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC
FILING FEE
113093
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
141976
$58.50*
12/20/93
$78.50
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF
EQUIPMENT MAINT
NOV 1993
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
12/20/93
$238.67
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
OCT 1993
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
141977
$317.17*
12/20/93
$3,168.94
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
002220
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
141978
$3,168.94*
12/20/93
$2,560.00
HERNANDEZ, LUIS
REFEREE
121393
GOLF DOME
PERS SERVICES
141979
$2,560.00*
12/20/93
$4,900.00
HINTZ CONSTRUCTION CO
RE -SIDE HOUSE
120993
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
141980
$4,900.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
HOFFMAN, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141981
$100.00*
12/20/93
$32.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
REPAIR PARTS
120193
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1818
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$130.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
RADIATOR RECORE
111293
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
1570
12/20/93
$32.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CLEAN & REPAIR RADIA
111993
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
1717
141982
$195.00*
12/20/93
$341.97
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
METER PARTS
0006436
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
5382
141983
$341.97*
12/20/93
$103.60
INTERIM
PROF SERVICES
C083870
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
141984
$103.60*
12/20/93
$204.45
INTERIOR COMMUNICATION
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7416
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$81.45
INTERIOR COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
7383
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
141985
$285.90*
12/20/93
$54.00
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE
SHOP LABOR
00141456
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$9.13
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE
ADAPTOR
127765
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1462
141986
$63.13*
12%20/93
$3,974.97
J -CRAFT INC
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
14255
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
141987
$3,974.97*
12/20/93
$40.13
JAFFEE, JAY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120993
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL
SUPPLI
141988
$40.13*
12/20/93
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141989
$100.00*
12/20/93
$4.23
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$86.32
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$55.66
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$90.13
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
112493
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
12/20/93
$92.58
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$28.24
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
GUN RANGE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$24.96
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$32.89
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$36.27
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$5.63
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$17.41
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
RECYCLING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$57.29
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$249.05
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$126.40
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$69.28
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$42.26
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$10.97
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
12/20/93
$42.11
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112493
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
141991
$1,071.68*
12/20/93
$168.70
JIM HATCH SALES
BATTERY
3045
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
1560
141992
$168.70*
12/20/93
$22.50
JOHNSON, CAROLYN
REFUND
121093
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC
OTHER
141993
$22.50*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 13
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$240.00
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
141994
$240.00*
12/20/93
$50.00
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART CENTER REFUND
121493
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
12/20/93
$58.50
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
12/20/93
$9.21
JOHNSON, NAOMI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121493
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$8.73
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ADVERTISING OTHER
121493
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
12/20/93
$47.01
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
121493
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
141995
$173.45*
12/20/93
$100.00
JOHNSON, WALTER
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
141996
-
$100.00*
12/20/93
$6.00
JULIEN, DIANE
PARKING
21393
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$4.19
JULIEN, DIANE
TOOLS
21393
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
12/20/93
$4.25
JULIEN, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
21393
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$4.48
JULIEN, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
21393
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
141997
$18.92*
12/20/93
$67.04
JUSTUS LUMBER
MISC SUPPLIES
38487
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1029
141998
$67.04*
12/20/93
$9,000.00
JYLAND HOMES
REFUND LANDSCAPE PER
121493
WORK. CAP. PRO
ESCROW DEPOSIT
141999
$9,000.00*
12/20/93
$60.93
KAMAN INDUST TECH
SPROCKET /CHAIN
A735889
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1237
12/20/93
$40.26
KAMAN INDUST TECH
BALL BEARING
A736360
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1547
142000
$101.19*
12/20/93
$228.20
KATTREH, ANN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121393
ED ADMINISTRAT
MILEAGE
142001
$228.20*
12/20/93
$2,429.00
KINGHORN, ROBERT C
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
121393
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
142002
$2,429.00*
12/20/93
$240.00
KLEINBERG, ERIC
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /PO
120893
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
142003
$240.00*
12/20/93
$38.32
KNOX COMM CREDIT
POLY
082290
MAINT OF COURS
CST OF GD FOOD
1685
12/20/93
$123.94
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
080096
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
1545
12/20/93
$43.82
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
081897
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
1720
12/20/93
$71.01
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
081903
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
1724
12/20/93
$48.96
KNOX COMM CREDIT
TOOLS
079614
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
1469
12/20/93
$31.89
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CEMENT
079149
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1448
12/20/93
$53.88
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
081062
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
1620
142004
$411.82*
12/20/93
$58.50
KOENING, KATHRYN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142005
$58.50*
12/20/93
$112.12
KUCERA, MARIT
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142006
$112.12*
T
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
--------------------------------7------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$67.60
KUEHNIS, KAREN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142007
$67.60*
12/20/93
$192.95
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
95614
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$1501.55
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
95607
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$1,,573.35
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
95098
YORK SELLING 1
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$1,021.25
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
95174
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
142008
$4,289.10*
12/20/93
$1,167.13
LAKE CONFERENCE ASSOC
LAKE PREVIEW %
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
142009
$1,167.13*
12/20/93
$61,848.16
LAKELAND FOR TRUCK
TANDEM DUMP
6657
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
6960
142010
$61,848.16*
12/20/93
$25.76
LANCRETE, LAURA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121393
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
12/20/93
$92.68
LANCRETE, LAURA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
NOVEMBER
PARK ADMIN.
- MILEAGE
142011
$118.44*
12/20/93
$383.75
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0948751
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1338
12/20/93
$439.38
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ACCESSORIES
948753
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1341
12/20/93
$191.53
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TAPE /SUPPLIES
948752
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1339
12/20/93
$196.94
LAWSON PRODUCTS
BLADES -BITS
0952698
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1455
12/20/93
$464.00
LAWSON PRODUCTS
BOLTS PARTS
0952697
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR.PARTS
1455
12/20/93
$463.25
LAWSON PRODUCTS
BITS -BOLTS
0949492
STREET_ NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1340
142012
$2,138.85*
12/20/93
$26.16
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
113093/G
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
142013
$26.16*
12/20/93
$97.37
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
161170
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQUI
142014
$97.37*
12/20/93
$268.37
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSIN
12/20/93
$268.38
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSIN
12/20/93
$4,573.97
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSIN
12/20/93
5268.38
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSIN
12/20/93
$1,916.77
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSIN
12/20/93
$1,129.90
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
113093
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSIN
142015
$8,425.77*
12/20/93
$31.50
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
179306
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1755
12/20/93
$133.23
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
179251
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1799
12/20/93
$254.50
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
178211
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
1452
12/20/93
$56.38
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
179304
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1755
12/20/93
$10.68
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
178439
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1764
142016
$486.29*
12/20/93
$485.55
LUGER, JEFFREY
CONT ED /GOLF COURSE
120993
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOLS
142017
$485.55*
12/20/93
$50.00
LUND, E.C.
REFUND /BRAEMAR ROOM
120693
GOLF PROG
RENTAL OF PROP
142018
$50.00*
3
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 15
CHECK NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$80.00
LUND, KAREN
ART
WORK
SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES
OTHER
142019
580.00*
12/20/93
$336.35
LUTZ, MICHAEL
UNIFORM
ALLOWANCE /PO
120793
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
142020
$336.35*
12/20/93
$13.40
M & I IND SUPPLY
TOOLS
11879
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
12/20/93
$107.85
M & I IND SUPPLY
TAPE
MEASURES
11831
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
1323
142021
$121.25*
12/20/93
$442.41
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25145
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$467.88
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25230
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$217.23
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25208
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$33.42
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25353
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$233.94
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25349
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$367.62
M AMUNDSON
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
25375
YORK'SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
142022
$1,762.50*
12/20/93
$25.00
M.A.U.M.A.
DUES
&
SUBSCRIPTIONS
112093
COMMUNICATIONS
DUES &
SUBSCRI
142023
$25.00*
12/20/93
$655.46
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
FILL
HOSE
40207
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
12/20/93
$83.38
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
SPROCKET
40107
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1562
142024
$738.84*
12/20/93
$2.81
MAGNUSON SOD CO.
SOD
110193
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
6958
12/20/93
$452.63
MAGNUSON SOD CO.
SOD
110193
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
142025
$455.44"
12/20/93
$1,111.00
MAIER STEWART & ASSOCI
PROF
ENG SERV
11029
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
142026
$1,111.00*
12/20/93
$14.65
MAILE, MIKE
FLEX
STAKE
111893
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
1648
142027
$14.65*
12/20/93
$10.95
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
197662
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$1,462.80
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
195311
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$3,380.40
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
197661
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$20.40
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
197663
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$98.00
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
113093/G
GRILL
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$63.20
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
195267
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$46.65
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
195268
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$1,386.55
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
195266
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$181.50
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
194256
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$116.20
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
192921
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$122.50
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
192030
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$23.40
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
192917
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$13.25
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
M
192919
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
MIX
12/20/93
$1,840.35
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
192918
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$3,200.15
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
192920
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
12/20/93
$494.55
MARK VII SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
B
195265
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS
BEE
142029
$12,460.85*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 16
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$383.63
MARLIN INDUSTRIAL DIVI
BULLETIN BOARD
120193
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
142030
$383.63*
12/20/93
$136.95
MARSHALL & SWIFT
MARSHALL SWIFT VAL G
122093
ASSESSING
GENERAL SUPPLI
142031
$136.95*
12/20/93
$780.65
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
10117
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
12/20/93
$413.23
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
10118
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
142032
$1,193.88*
12/20/93
$173.22
MCNEILUS STEEL
BEAM /STEEL
0160777
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
1431
142033
$173.22*
12/20/93
$410.03
MECO
ACCESSORIES
61691
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
12/20/93
$101.98
MECO
ACCESSORIES
61668
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1684
12/20/93
$442.02
MECO
ADAPTOR
61463
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1684
- 12/20/93
$.297.10
MECO
ADAPTER
61632
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1572
12/20/93
$183.69
MECO
ADAPTER
61640
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1684
12/20/93
$23.86
MECO
REPAIR PARTS
61610
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1684
142034
$1,458.68*
12/20/93
$25,588.86
MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN
HOSPITALIZATION
1139215
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
142035
$25,588.86*
12/20/93
$110.48
MEDZIS, ANDREW
CONT ED /FIRE
121393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142036
$110.48*
12/20/93
$100.00
MERFELD, BURT
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142037
$100.00*
12/20/93
$494.95
MERIT SUPPLY
WASH & WAX
34637
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1482
12/20/93
$389.23
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
34627
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
1458
12/20/93
$325.99
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
34839
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
1900
12/20/93
$484.68
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34868
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1935
12/20/93
$431.43
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34851
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
1901
12/20/93
$477.65
MERIT SUPPLY
ACCESSORIES
34783
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1731
12/20/93
$138.92
MERIT SUPPLY
ANTI- SCRUB /SOAP
34703
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
1537
12/20/93
$446.12
MERIT SUPPLY
VULKEM /BAGS
34760
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1719
12/20/93
$490.58
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
34824
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
1703
142038
$3,679.55*
12/20/93
$40.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE FEES
121393
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
142039
$40.00*
12/20/93
$6,682.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC REIMBURSEMENT
NOVEMBER
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
142040
$6,682.00*
12/20/93
$1,150.00
MICHALKO, JIM
BRIDGE INSPECTION CE
121293
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
142041
$1,150.00*
12/20/93
$315.00
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
13682
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
12/20/93
$234.80
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13682
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
i
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 17
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$57.87
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
13534
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
12/20/93
$205.31
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13534
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$5,334.49
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13839
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$522.18
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13534
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$48.64
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
13839
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
142042
$6,718.29*
12/20/93
$58.91
MIDWEST MACHINERY INC
PUSH PULL /ARM
24975
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1631
12/20/93
$23.97
MIDWEST MACHINERY INC
REPAIR WORK
103159
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
142043
$82.88*
12/20/93
$16.88
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOO
TOOLS
25559670
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
1727
142044
$16.88*
12/20/93
$10.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
122093
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
12/20/93
$10.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0
PESTICIDE LICENSE
122093
PARK MAINTENAN
LIC & PERMITS
142045
$20.00*
12/20/93
$47.88
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
AD- PICKUP TRUCK
10735
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$30.96
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
BIDS -RANGE BALLS
10732
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$120.96
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
HRG- PROPERTY TAX
10685
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$23.76
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
AD- RECYCLE TRAILER
10734
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$33.06
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
PUBLIC HRG STS -226
10733
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$76.50
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
HELP WANTED ADS
112693
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERTISING LE
142046
$333.12*
12/20/93
$146.96
MINVALCO
OIL PUMP /STRIPPER
3110256
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1430
142047
$146.96*
12/20/93
$148.04
MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL
DATA PROCESSING
1256663
EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROCESSIN
142048
$148.04*
12/20/93
$951.40
MN DEPT REVENUE
FUEL TAX
NOV 1993
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
142049
$951.40*
12/20/93
$190.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
42399
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
1343
142050
$190.00*
12/20/93
$1,769.00
MN STATE TREA /BLG IN
STATE SUR CHARGE REI
NOV 1993
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
142051
$1,769.00*
12/20/93
$182.00
MN WOMENS PRESS INC
HELP WANTED ADS
918
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERTISING LE
142052
$182.00*
12/20/93
$401.65
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
141640
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$142.35
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
142751
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$151.95
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
142752
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$71.28
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
143276
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
- $18.48
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
143277
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
142053
$748.75*
12/20/93
$65.00
MN. ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR SERVICE
110363
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
142054
$65.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 18
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$50.26
MN. GLOVE
TOE BOOT
86737
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
9621
12/20/93
$43.98
MN. GLOVE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
86947
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
142055
$94.24*
12/20/93
$40.65
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
387456
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1610
12/20/93
$49.16
MN. TORO INC.
SPROCKET /PULLEY
386793
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1520
142056
$89.81*
12/20/93
$2,111.42
MN. WANNER
SWEEPER
20369.
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
12/20/93
$57.81
MN. WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
20396
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
-
12/20/93
$8.82
MN. WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
20395
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
142057
$2,178.05*
12/20/93
$356.22
MODERN BIN EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26318 -D
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
1783
142058
$356.22*
12/20/93
$1,612.00
MOTOROLA INC
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
W2700602
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
142059
$1,612.00*
12/20/93
$560.00
MPLS HOCKEY OFFICIALS
REFEREES /PREVIEW
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
142060
$560.00*
12/20/93
$210.00
MR H/ SOCCER WORLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
43678
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
1787
142061
$210.00*
12/20/93
$316.90
MURRAY SANDLER SUP
SKATE GRINDER
14763
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1911
142062
$316.90*
12/20/93
$43.00
N.A.D.A.
USED CAR GUIDE
111993
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
142063
$43.00*
12/20/93
$30.00
N.W. CHAPTER F.B.I.N.A
CONT ED POLICE
121493
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
142064
$30.00*
12/20/93
$99.05
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
950818
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1803
12/20/93
$93.46
NAPA AUTO PARTS
DIST. CAP
022390
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$4.26
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
960161
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1539
142065
$196.77*
12/20/93
$395.00
NATIONAL BUSINESS FINA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
03436
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
142066
$395.00*
12/20/93
$177.12
NATIONAL EMERGENCY TRA
CONT ED /FIRE /STEVE L
120993
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142067
$177.12*
12/20/93
$590.15
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
641643
CLUB HOUSE
ALARM SERVICE
12/20/93
$156.26
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
641810
ART CENTER BLD
ALARM SERVICE
12/20/93
$196.79
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
641813
VERNON OCCUPAN
ALARM SERVICE
12/20/93
$197.42
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
641814
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
142068
$1,140.62*
12/20/93
$335.84
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
234067
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$151.97
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
F 232463
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
142069
$487.81*
12/20/93
$499.27
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGNS
2011597
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
1559
142070
$499.27*
12/20/93
$314.40
NFPA
FIRE PREVENTION
0971918
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRE PREVENTIO
142071
$314.40*
12/20/93
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
POLICE
SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142072
$100.00*
12/20/93
$122.49
NORDIC TRUCK PARTS
REFLECTIVE
TAPE
107199
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9458
142073
$122.49*
12/20/93
$25.00
NORMANDALE COMMUNITY
C
CONT ED
/POLICE
120793
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
142074
$25.00*
12/20/93
$2,524.17
NORTH AMERICAN SALT
CO
SALT
814660
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
142075
$2,524.17*
12/20/93
$85.00
NORTH STAR CHAPTER
DUES &
SUBSCRIPTIONS
121393
INSPECTIONS
DUES & SUBSCRI
142076
$85.00*
12/20/93
$50.59
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
709810
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1766
12/20/93
$47.50
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
707490
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$856.96
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
707510
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$28.76
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
708200
MAINT OF COURS.REPAIR
PARTS
1763
142077
$983.81*
12/20/93
$37.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M 76529
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
-$1.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M 7309SCR
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$68.40
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M 77511
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$111.60
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M 77385
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$73.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M 77550
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
142078
$289.20*
12/20/93
$235.02
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
213641
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
1663
142079
$235.02*
12/20/93
$131.50
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
HAZ. WASTE
DISPOSAL
NW6107
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
12/20/93
$78.40
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6108
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$22.90
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6105
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$170.19
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6106
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$139.83
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6342
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$163.46
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6261
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$41.00
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6578
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$213.00
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
NW6607
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$265.75
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6606
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$332.15
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6101
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$333.22
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6102
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$246.12
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW6103
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
12/20/93
$190.27
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES
NW5881
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 20
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
142080
$2,327.79*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/2
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
142081
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/1
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
142082
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/3
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
142083
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/4
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
142084
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/5
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142085
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/6
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142086
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/8
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142087
$15.00*
12/20/93
$15.00
NREMT
REGISTRATION /FIRE
121393/7
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142088
$15.00*
12/20/93
$4,923.38
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$1 150.71
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
1436.43
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$1,044.62
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
GOLF DOME
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$24.19
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
GENERAL MAINT
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$147.69
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$7.40
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
ST LIGHTING OR•LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$7796.54
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
ED BUILDING &
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$3,,274.84
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$111.97
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$225.85
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$7.40
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$114.88
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$318.94
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$1,514.64
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$8.97
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$2,300.05
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
PW BUILDING
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$576.90
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$984.79
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$1,903.15
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$261.96
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$61.07
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$3,583.75
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$365.08
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
GUN RANGE
LIGHT
& POWER
12/20/93
$2557.01
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
122093
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
& POWER
142090
$33,,702.21*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 21
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$3,450.00
ODLAND PROTECTIVE COAT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
120893
TANKS TOWERS &
CONTR REPAIRS
142091
$3,450.00*
12/20/93
$41.54
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32128
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
1668
12/20/93
$469.67
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32129
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
1514
142092
$511.21*
12/20/93
$115.00
OLSEN FIRE PROTECTION
SPRINKLER SYSTEM INS
13868
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQUI
1993
142093
$115.00*
12/20/93
$77.28
ONISCHUK, JACKIE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
121393
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
142094
$77..28*
12/20/93
$5,291.01
ORVIS, JOAN
SERVICES /ARENA
121093
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC OTHER
142095
$5,291.01*
12/20/93
$378.08
OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10682
SKATING RINK M
CONTR REPAIRS
1814
142096
$378.08*
12/20/93
$77.50
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
4H8778
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
12/20/93
$74.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
4H8663
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
142097
$151.50*
12/20/93
$157.78
OWENS SERVICE CO
CHEMICALS
78551
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1614
142098
$157.78*
12/20/93
$144.00
P Q T COMPANY
CHRISTMAS TREES
52742
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1912
142099
4144.00*
12/20/93
$23.67
PAMECO CORPORATION
ELECTRIC PARTS
2069088
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1457
142100
$23.67*
12/20/93
$233.00
PARAMOUNT CERAMICS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
85912
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
1662
142101
$233.00*
12/20/93
$140.00
PATTIWORKS INC
PRO SERVICES
121393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
142102
4140.00*
12/20/93
$77.79
PBE
ACCESSORIES
A657080
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9066
142103
$77.79*
12/20/93
$125.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
46901506
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
12/20/93
$13.97
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
46996104
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$80.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
45506105
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
142104
$218.97*
12/20/93
$805.05
PHYSIO CONTROL
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
A08780
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
142105
$805.05*
12/20/93
$368.49
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH
SIGNS
3676
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2101/201
12/20/93
$457.95
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH'
SIGNAGE
3674
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
142106
$826.44*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 22
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$345.57
PLANT EQUIP INC
CHECK VALVE PARTS
15345
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
1812
142107
$345.57*
12/20/93
$1,139.09
PLUMBING & HEATING REP
EMERGENCY SEWER REPA
001084
SEWER TREATMEN
CONTR REPAIRS
142108
$1,139.09*
12/20/93
$33.12
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
649230
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
142109
$33.12*
12/20/93
$45.00
POLICE INSTITUTE
CONT ED /POLICE
120893
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
142110
$45.00*
12/20/93
$2,025.00
POSTMASTER
PARK & REC MAILING /C
120793
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
142111
$2,025.00*
12/20/93
$75.00
POSTMASTER
PRESORT FIRST CLASS
122093
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
142112
$75.00*
12/20/93
$195.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE /SR CENTER
120293
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
142113
$195.00*
12/20/93
$1,668.48
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
TREE TRIMMING
120293
TREE TRIMMING
CIP
12/20/93
$665.63
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
REMOVE TREE FROM CRE
120693
TREES & MAINTE
CONTR REPAIRS
142114
$2,334.11*
12/20/93
$54.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
BLADE SHARPENING
91617
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
142115
$54.00*
12/20/93
$570.00
PROFILE EVALUATION INC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
142826
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
142116
$570.00*
12/20/93
$127.50
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING
PRO ENG SERV
93022.02
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
142117
$127.50*
12/20/93
$15.87
PUSH PEDAL & PULL
EXERCISE BIKE BELT
028113
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
142118
$15.87*
12/20/93
$133.17
QUICK SERV BATTERY
OIL FILTER
90844
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1751
12/20/93
$93.44
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTER
88877
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1575
142119
$226.61*
12/20/93
$50.58
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18695
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1932
142120
$50.58*
12/20/93
$1,810.50
RAWLINGS VIDEO
VIDEO EQUIPMENT
111793
EDINB /CL PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
142121
$1,810.50*
12/20/93
$467.01
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4011
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
1909
12/20/93
$202.92
REM SUPPLIES
GLOVES
4005
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1417
12/20/93
$444.75
REM SUPPLIES
SHELVES & LIGHTS
4022
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2007
142122
$1,114.68*
12/20/93
$2,100.00
RESCUE ONE
RESCUE BOARD /SUIT
5076
GENERAL FD PRO
ACCTS REC MISC
y
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 23
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
142123
$2,100.00*
12/20/93
$3,965.55
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
72117
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$1,555.60
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
72407
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$2,006.75
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
71347
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$725.35
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
70562
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$25.40
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
M
72115
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$2,163.00
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
71501
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$1,613.30
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
72116
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$4,260.80
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
B
71346
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
142124
$16,315.75*
12/20/93
$160.00
RIFFEY, JANE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142125
$160.00*
12/20/93
$19.98
RITZ CAMERA
FILM PROCESSING
3751912
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1639
142126
$19.98*
12/20/93
$250.28
ROAD RESCUE
SIREN
140980
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1415
12/20/93
$64.65
ROAD RESCUE
REPAIR PARTS
140722
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
142127
$314.93*
12/20/93
$426.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
54494
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$426.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55287
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
1936
12/20/93
$33.02
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
41198
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
142128
$885.02*
12/20/93
$58.50
ROBINSON, MARGARET
CLASS REFUND
113093
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
142129
$58.50*
12/20/93
$71.69
ROFIDAL, SUE
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142130
$71.69*
12/20/93
$58.36
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
COCO MATS
0075251
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
142131
$58.36*
12/20/93
$809.64
RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP
NORMANDALE GOLF COUR
5
NORMANDALE CLU
CIP
142132
$809.64*
12/20/93
$105.00
RUSSELL, DEBLYN
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
142133
$105.00*
12/20/93
$1,194.23
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47841
DISTRIBUTION
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$1,924.42
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47460
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$1,478.79
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47788
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$971.70
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47368
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$75.59
SA -AG INC
SAND
47427
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$1,130.72
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47180
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
12/20/93
$1,534.11
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL &
ROCK
47412
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
142134
$8,309.56*
12/20/93
$334.21
SCAN AIR FILTER
MISC
40301
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1459
142135
$334.21*
7
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 24
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-----------------------------------7--------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$84.00
SCHUBBE, DAVID
CLASS REFUND
120893
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
142136
$84.00*
12/20/93
$104.35
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
120193
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
12/20/93
$81.18
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F
120193
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
142137
$185.53*
12/20/93
$150.00
SEIDEL, ROXANNE
PROF SERV
121393
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
142138
$150.00*
12/20/93
$46.80
SHANNON, JOAN
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142139
$46.80*
12/20/93
$60.00
SHELP, NANCY
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
142140
$60.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142141
$100.00*
12/20/93
$83.00
SHIGO & TREES ASSOCIAT
BOOK FOR FORESTRY
120193
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
142142
$83.00*
12/20/93
$291.19
SHIRLEY, TOM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
121493
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
142143
$291.19*
12/20/93
$166.30
SMEGAL, GREGORY
CORDLESS DRILL
121393
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TOOLS
142144
$166.30*
12/20/93
$41.83
SMITH & WESSON
AMMUNITION
24191002
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
1267
142145
$41.83*
12/20/93
$99.90
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU
ADVERTISING LEGAL
CPCO2869
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
142146
$99.90*
12/20/93
$1,263.80
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
35094
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$552.40
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
34952
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$3,253.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
35095
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$56.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
24638
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$3,569.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
34949
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
142147
$8,695.65*
12/20/93
$41.08
SPECIAL EFFECTS
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142148
$41.08*
12/20/93
$385.00
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
SHUT OFF TAGS
2910
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
1942
12/20/93
$385.00
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2911
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
1887
142149
$770.00*
.
12/20/93
$275..00
SPECTRUM SAFETY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
EPK10010
SKATING & HOCK
PROF SERVICES
142150
$275.00*
12/20/93
$83.45
SPS
GAS VALVE
2120645
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1544
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 25
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
12/20/93
$28.95
SPS
PLUMBING PARTS
2130895
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1862
12/20/93
$101.52
SPS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2122473
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
1605
12/20/93
$24.28
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2124911
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REPAIR PARTS
1643
12/20/93
$24.43
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2125672
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
1626
12/20/93
$12.59
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2132329
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1880
12/20/93
$74.86
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2132328
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1876
142151
$350.08*
12/20/93
$50.12
ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT
STRUT
SI15001
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1541
142152
$50.12*
12/20/93
$1,313.98
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING LEGAL
86447000
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERTISING LE
12/20/93
$1,560.00
STAR TRIBUNE
PRINTING
86447000
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
142153
$2,873.98*
12/20/93
$120.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PLUMBING LICENSE
120793
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
142154
$120.00*
12/20/93
$60.20
STATE OF MINNESOTA
FEE FOR SERVICE
69 -3100-
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
142155
$60.20*
12/20/93
$167.47
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
71862.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
12/20/93
$30.94
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
67833.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
8130
12/20/93
$90.66
STREICHERS
CLUTH ASSM /ADAPTER A
74894.1
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$33.66
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
69437.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
142156
$322.73*
12/20/93
$178.77
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
PROF ENG SERV
0931940/
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
142157
$178.77*
12/20/93
$791.50
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
168822
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
142158
$791.50*
12/20/93
$120.00
SULLIVAN, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
121493
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
12/20/93
$29.90
SULLIVAN, MONICA
ART WORK SOLD
121493
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
142159
$149.90*
12/20/93
$9.36
SUPERAMERICA
GAS
111693/S
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
142160
$9.36*
12/20/93
$41.50
SURGE WATER COND
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
R024311
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
142161
$41.50*
12/20/93
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142162
$100.00*
12/20/93
$810.20
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
120193
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
12/20/93
$136.57
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120193
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$132.75
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
CLEANING SUPPLIES
120193
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
142163
$1,079.52*
12/20/93
$31.79
SYSTEM SUPPLY
PAPER
012058
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1914
12/20/93
$32.00
SYSTEM SUPPLY
PAPER
012058
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
1914
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$32.00
SYSTEM SUPPLY
PAPER
012058
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1914
142164
$95.79*
12/20/93
$215.93
T.C. MOULDING & SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
96067.1
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
1664
142165
$215.93*
12/20/93
$50.00
TABOR, JIM
REFUND /BRAEMAR ROOM
120193
GOLF PROG
RENTAL OF PROP
142166
$50.00*
12/20/93
$166.00
TARGET
VACUUM CLEANER
60494
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
— $168.26
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112193
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$51.94
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
37980
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$48.23
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
47904
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/20/93
$22.98
TARGET
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
49349
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
12/20/93
$38.78
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13181
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
142167
$159.67*
12/20/93
$91.66
TESSMAN SEED INC
TREE WRAP
16804
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
142168
$91.66*
12/20/93
$260.74
THE BOOKMEN INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
208586
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
1922
12/20/93
$412.59
THE BOOKMEN INC
ART WORK SOLD /BOOKS
209307
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
9026
142169
$673.33*
12/20/93
$293.45
THE HOWE COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
T760653
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1856
142170
$293.45*
12/20/93
$59.11
THE KANE SERVICE
PROF SERVICES
5177215
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
142171
$59.11*
12/20/93
$50.12
THE REGISTRY
DINNERS
2366
MUNICIPALS
PROF SERVICES
142172
$50.12*
12/20/93
$248.00
THE WALL STREET JOURNA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
122093
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
142173
$248.00*
12/20/93
$70.00
THERMEX CORP
REPAIR FURNACE
36409
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
1525
142174
$70.00*
12/20/93
$644.00
THOMAS MOORE INC
TEMP HELP
19179
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
12/20/93
$448.50
THOMAS MOORE INC
TEMP HELP
19256
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
142175
$1,092.50*
12/20/93
$595.60
THOMSEN - NYBECK
MISC LITIGATION
79563
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
12/20/93
$11,469.07
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
79604
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
142176
$12,064.67*
12/20/93
$4,207.40
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
10040
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$160.15
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
10040
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$3 461.70
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
10886.
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
fi17.45
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
23611
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/20/93
$152.00
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
4879
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/20/93
$2,271.60
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
23611
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
a
A •
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 27
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
142177
410,370.30*
12/20/93
$87.98
TOLL COMPANY
PROPANE
246642
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
1598
12/20/93
$21.29
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
244419
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
142178
$109.27*
12/20/93
$1,297.00
TONKA SEAMLESS GUTTERS
NEW GUTTER /DOWNSPOUT
120193
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
142179
$1,297.00*
12/20/93
5184.07
TRANSPORT WHITEGMC INC
DIPSTICK
115504
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1305
142180
$184.07*
12/20/93
$21.36
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
99794
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
1148
142181
$21.36*
12/20/93
496.00
TWIN CITY BEEKEEPING
SALES OTHER
121093
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
1924
142182
$96.00*
12/20/93
$49.00
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
29169
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
12/20/93
$345.86
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
REPLACE SPRING
26249
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
142183
$394.86*
12/20/93
$45.88
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
15537
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
142184
$45.88*
12/20/93
$60.79
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
REPAIR PARTS
6585
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
9536
12/20/93
$43.54
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
SAW PARTS
6821
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
9959
12/20/93
$70.07
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
REPAIR PARTS
7122
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
1652
142185
$174.40*
12/20/93
$70.29
TWIN CITY TRUCK EQ INC
BRACKET KIT
50524
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1484
142186
$70.29*
12/20/93
$188.00
UHL CO
REPAIR PARTS
67337
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
142187
$188.00*
12/20/93
$1,994.88
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
121193
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
12/20/93
$18.04
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
416680
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
142188
$2,012.92*
12/20/93
$336.41
UNISTRUT NORTHERN
MATERIAL
42825
PAVEMENT MARKI
PAINT
142189
$336.41*
12/20/93
$430.01
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
MISC ELECTRIC
27172400
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1651
1¢2190
$430.01*
12/20/93
$520.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
120893
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOLS
142191
$520.00*
12/20/93
$48.99
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
120193/E
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$27.01
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
120193
PARKING MONITO
TELEPHONE
142192
$76.00*
I
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 15
1993 01:52:40
Page 28
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/20/93
$109.96
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$57.17
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$152.23
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$636.95
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$208.90
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$244.65
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$54.18
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$54.18
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
DARE
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$105.62
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$40.66
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
GUN RANGE
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$7.27
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$182.91
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
12/20/93
$4,467.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122093
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
142193
$6,322.48*
12/20/93
$276.90
VAN WATERS & ROGERS
CALCIUM CHLORIDE PAL
ST237972
GENERAL MAINT
CALCIUM CHLORI
1475
142194
$276.90*
12/20/93
$99.44
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12733
ART CENTER BLD
CONTR REPAIRS
1385
12/20/93
$156.61
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12761
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
2008
142195
$256.05*
12/20/93
$575.10
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
SWITCHER
7393
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$467.54
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
REPAIR PARTS
7384
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1646
12/20/93
$463.28
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
REPAIR PARTS
7375
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1453
12/20/93
$437.72
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
CAMERA MOUNT /CAMERA
7378
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1485
12/20/93
$471.80
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
HOUSING UNITS /SUNSHI
7379
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1543
12/20/93
$477.68
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
CABLE CONNECTORS /CAB
7390
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1725
12/20/93
$436.65
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
CAMERA
7383
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1622
12/20/93
$451.56
VIDEO PROTECTI N SERVI
OUTDOOR HOUSING W /HT
7381
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1563
142196
$3,781.33*
12/20/93
$122.84
VIKING ELECTRIC
SPLINE -
1104318
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
142197
$122.84*
12/20/93
$73,868.26
VOLK SEWER & WATER\INC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
93 -7 PYM
SANITARY SEWER
CIP
142198
$73,868.26*
12/20/93
$527.30
VOSS LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
231059
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
142199
$527.30*
12/20/93
$372.33
VOYAGER ELECTRONICS CO
LIFT STATION PARTS
58278
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
1472
142200
$372.33*
12/20/93
$107.02
W W GRAINGER
INDUCER /SCREW DRIVER
49867232
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1607
12/20/93
$61.92
W W GRAINGER
TON PULLER
49867390
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1698
12/20/93
$123.49
W W GRAINGER
TROLLEY
49866858
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
1414
12/20/93
$208.69
W W GRAINGER
WALL FAN /TIMER
49867037
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
12/20/93
$21.60
W W GRAINGER
RELIEF VALVE
49521053
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1461
12/20/93
$60.85
W W GRAINGER
24 HR TIMER
49522015
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1698
142201
$583.57*
12/20/93
$559.13
WAGERS OFFICE SYSTEMS
FAX MACHINE
780260
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1066
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 16
1993 01:52:40
Page 29
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
142202
$559.13*
12/20/93
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142203
$100.00*
12/20/93
$250.00
WASSMUND, TOM
SNOW PLOWING
120193
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
142204
$250.00*
12/20/93
$100.00
WAVERLY CANNON WORKS
GRINDING REELS
120693
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQUI
1915
142205
$100.00*
12/20/93
$25.00
WAYZATA HIGH SCHOOL
PRINTING PROGRAMS
120393
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
142206
$25.00*
12/20/93
$162.60
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
REGULATOR
7789
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1483
12/20/93
$244.83
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
PIPE PARTS
8063
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1638
12/20/93
$281.77
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
ELECTRODE
7541
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
1456
12/20/93
$164.62
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
BUSHING /ELBOW
7829
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1561
142207
$853.82*
12/20/93
$180.62
WHEELER LUMBER
POST
12200094
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1546
12/20/93
$191.70
WHEELER LUMBER
MATERIAL
13400033
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
142208
$372.32*
12/20/93
$247.88
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
MATS
40415
GOLF DOME
RANGE BALLS
1782
142209
$247.88*
12/20/93
$17.04
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
244502
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1406
12/20/93
$17.04
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
242901
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1025
142210
$34.08*
12/20/93
$100.00
WROBLESKI, HENRY
POLICE SERVICES
DEC 1993
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
142211
$100.00*
12/20/93
$585.75
XEROX CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
15130632
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
142212
$585.75*
12/20/93
$235.38
ZIEGLER INC
REPAIR PARTS
MC60855
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
142213
$235.38*
$1,850,624.41
R
COUNCIL
CHECK
SUMMARY Thu Dec 16 1993
01:54:23 Page 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
GENERAL FUND
$849,609.24
FUND
#
11
C.D.B.G.
$9,285.50
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATION
$70.13
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$16,085.21
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$7,638.59
FUND
#
26
SWIMMING POOL
$171.03
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE
$315,173.40
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA
$102,130.01
FUND
#
29
GUN RANGE
$1,014.83
FUND
#
30
EDINB /CENT LAKES
$21,801.52
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$27,808.73
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER
$1,460.14
FUND
#
42
RECYCLING
$40,940.77
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR FUND
$70,442.05
FUND
#
60
CONSTRUCT FUND
$73,868.26
FUND
#
66
IBR #2 FUND
$313,125.00
$1,850,624.41
S