HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-03-21_COUNCIL PACKET(REVISED AGENDA - ITEM IV.A. WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA BY STAFF)
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 21, 1994
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to
be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence
of the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of March 7, 1994
II. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATIONS - Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust
- Tobacco Free Youth Day
PRESENTATION OF AWARD - Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Council Meeting of March 7, 1994
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of
all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Commercial District. PCD -4 and Single
Dwelling Unit District. R -1 to Planned Residence District, PRD -4 4101 West
50th Street, 5014, 5016 and 5024 Halifax Avenue, Haymaker Construction, Inc.
B. 1994 Urban Hennepin Countv CDBG Program
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Traffic Marking Paint (Withdrawn from Agenda by staff)
* B. Work Vehicle - Braemar Golf Course
* C. Mini -Cargo Van - Utility Department
Agenda
Edina City Council
March 21, 1994
Page Two
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A.
Permit to Keep Extra Dogs and Cats
- 4737 Hibiscus Av (Contd from 3/7/94)
B.
Permit to Keep Extra Dogs - 4817 Vandervork Av
C.
On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer
License - Great Food, Inc. dba /Original
Pancake House/My Pie
Apr
D.
Wine License Renewals
7:00
E.
Beer License Renewals
Chambers
F.
Tax Forfeit Land (Hennepin County
List 805 NC)
G.
Traffic Signal Agreements - West 54th /France and West 58th /France
H.
Local Government Unit - Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District
I.
Update on Purchasing Policies and
Procedures
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
8:00
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
I%. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 03/17/94 Total: $486,035.10 and for
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 03/11/94 Total: $320,735.95
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
/EVENTS
Mon
Apr
4
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
Wed
Apr
6
Annual Council /Boards /Commissions Dinner
6:00
P.M.
Braemar
Clubhouse
Sat
Apr
9
Council Study Session
8:00
A.M.
Arneson
Acres
Mon
Apr
11
Board of Review
5:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
Mon
Apr
18
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council
Chambers
Wed
Apr
20
Annual Volunteers Reception
5:00
P.M.
Edinborough Park
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARCH 79 1994
ROTTrALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was
seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE BRA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1994, APPROVED Motion was made by
Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the ERA
Minutes of February 22, 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of BRA claims
as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 3, 1994, and consisting
of one page totalling $16,322.75. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
/1NA
O
OR, POw�1tC /
\\ i886 j
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, six million Jews were -systematically murdered by Nazi Germany and their
collaborators from 1933 to 1945, as well as hundreds of thousands of Sinti and
Roma (Gypsies) and the handicapped; millions of Poles, religious and political
dissidents, and those deemed by the Nazis to be "unworthy of life" were swept
into this abyss; and
WHEREAS, all citizens of the United States should remember the atrocities committed by
Nazi Germany and their collaborators and recognize that each of us must
remain vigilant against tyranny; and
WHEREAS, Friday, April 8, 1994, has been designated, pursuant to an Act of Congress,
as a Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust, known
internationally as Yom Hashoah; and
10 WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the citizens of Edina to join in this commemoration with
the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, this nation's center for
learning and remembrance of the Holocaust:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mary H. Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim the week of Sunday April 3, through Sunday, April 10, 1994, as
DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE VICTIMS
OF THE HOLOCAUST
in memory of those victims and in the hope that we will strive, as a nation and
individually, to overcome prejudice and inhumanity through education,
vigilance and tolerance.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
Mayor Pro-Tern
UNITED'- `�_ STATES
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM
Februrary 18, 1994
Honorable Frederick Richards
Mayor of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mayor Richards:
�p1
V S
The United States Holocaust Memorial Council was mandated to lead the
nation in annual commemorations of the victims of the Holocaust, known as
Days of Remembrance [Public Law 96-388,10/7/801. Millions of American
citizens, both at home and abroad will participate in Remembrance
observances from Sunday, April 3, through Sunday, April 10, 1994. The theme
for this year's commemoration is Fifty Years Ago: Darkness Before Dawn. We
recall the events of 1944, a year in which Nazi Germany decimated the Jewish
populations of Hungary, northern Italy, France, the Greek Islands, and the
Netherlands. Thousands of European Gypsies were killed in this year alone.
East European forced laborers, ill with tuberculosis, were murdered in the
so- called euthanasia centers. It was also the year in which the first major war
crimes trial was held, that of the commandant and guards at Majdanek, a
death camp located in the suburb of Lublin, Poland, and liberated by the Soviet
troops in July of 1944.
Now more than ever, your personal leadership in this national commitment
to remember and commemorate is essential. Thus, we respectfully request
that you issue a Days of Remembrance Proclamation (suggestion enclosed)
and forward it, or a copy, to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for
your City's permanent archive. This sends a message to the citizens of your
City that in such trying times, you went on record to keep the promise "Never
Again."
The annual Days of Remembrance provide Americans with an opportunity
to reflect anew upon our history and to contemplate our moral responsibilities
to humankind, values our ancestors held dear. We look forward to receiving
your Proclamation and hope that you will also initiate and participate in
Remembrance ceremonies in your City.
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, which opened to the public
in April, 1993, has had an extremely successful year greeting well over one
million visitors who came to learn what evil can do. We aspire to spread our
message of learning and remembrance to all Americans through the Museum
and the Days of Remembrance. We are deeply grateful for your strong
support.
Sincerely,
J
enram in e r
ed
Chairman, Days of Remembrance
Enclosure
A Project of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council
100 Raoul \Vallenbcrg Place, SW Washington, DC 2002+ -2170, Telephone (202) 488 -0400, Fax (202) 488 -2690
/ A
o,
v
Pot" w�
IflBB
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, more than 400,000 premature deaths occur each year in the United. States
from tobacco - related causes. The epidemic is totally preventable - and the
key opportunities for prevention are during childhood and adolescence.
WHEREAS, at least 3.1 million adolescents are current smokers, and smoking is most
common among 17 and 18 year olds with about 25 percent of these young
people smoking.
WHEREAS, nicotine is often the first drug used by young people who use alcohol,
marijuana and harder drugs.
WHEREAS, for most smokers, nicotine addiction begins during childhood or adolescence.
WHEREAS, cigarette advertising appears to increase young people's risk of smoking by
conveying that smoking has social benefits and that it is more common than
it really is.
WHEREAS, in Minnesota, teenagers were illegally sold over four and a half million packs
of cigarettes in 1991.
WHEREAS, the most effective preventive programs are community wide ones that combine
education and public policy approaches.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mary H. Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of Edina, do hereby declare March
24, 1994, as
TOBACCO FREE YOUTH DAY
and urge all citizens of Edina to take part in this most important day.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
Mayor Pro -Tem
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
350 South Fifth Street - Rm 331
Minneapolis.Minnesota 55415 -1393
(612) 673 -2100
Fax (612) 673 -2305
SHARON SAYLES BELTON
MAYOR
March 9, 1994
The Honorable Frederick S. Richards
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mayor Richards,
inneapolis
city of lakes
On March 24 an important event is taking place nationwide that can have an impact on the health
of young people and families in our community. The event is a national videoconference called "Youth and
Elders Against Tobacco Use ". Surgeon General Dr. Joycelyn Elders will present the results of the 1994
Surgeon General's report — the first report to focus specifically on preventing tobacco use among young
people. Tobacco use continues to be an epidemic in this country, an epidemic that causes more than
420,000 premature deaths each year. This epidemic is totally preventable — and the key opportunities for
prevention are during childhood and adolescence.
I invite you to join me in proclaiming March 24 to be "Tobacco-Free Youth Day" in your community.
In Minneapolis, I will ask all sectors of my community - educators, youth leaders, business people, media
representatives, policy makers, families and young people - to take steps collectively to prevent smoking
among young people. Young people will be involved in this event by presenting me with the first -ever
children's version of the Surgeon General's Report called "SGR 4 Kids ".
3V ii — y
If you are ki/terested in joining me in this effort, please call Gretchen Griffin at the Community Pre-
vention office, 8 -5694, no later than March 14. The Community Prevention Coalition can provide copies
of a sample "Tobacco -Free Youth Day" proclamation, a copy of the Executive Summary of the
1994 Surgeon General's Report, and a copy of "SGR 4 Kids ". They also have information about youth
groups throughout Hennepin County involved in the "Send The Camel Packing" project. These groups
may be interested in participating in a "Tobacco -Free Youth Day" event in your community.
For most smokers, nicotine addiction begins during childhood or adolescence. If young people can
be kept tobacco -free, most will never start using tobacco. Working together, we can accomplish this goal.
Sincerely,
_ Sharon Sayles Belton
Mayor of Minneapolis
TDD (612) 673 -2157 jl II �' _° __ -_ ® Recycled Paper 30/
Post Consumer Fi
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Fit,
El
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 7, 1994
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded
by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY MEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following
proclamation which was unanimously adopted by motion of Member Paulus, seconded
by Member Kelly:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Camp Fire Boys and Girls, the national organization, will celebrate its
84th birthday on March 17, 1994; and
WHEREAS, Camp Fire, Minnesota Rivers Council in the State of Minnesota, teaches
boys and girls self - reliance, good citizenship and leadership; and
WHEREAS, through contemporary programs and by speaking out on issues affecting
youth and their families, Camp Fire helps youth cope with their changing world;
and
WHEREAS, in Camp Fire, the choices and opportunities are inclusive to boys and
girls; and
WHEREAS, Camp Fire is commended for the valuable programs offered to young people
in the City of Edina and throughout the nation and for the many services these
young people perform for their community through Camp Fire.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
officially proclaim March 13 - 19, 1994, to be
CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEEK
in the City of Edina, Minnesota.
ADOPTED this seventh day of March, 1994.
Accepting the Proclamation were Barbara Kerr - Anderson, Leader and Camp Fire
members Karen Rustad, Nickey Kerr - Anderson and Corrine Wilson.
*MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1994, APPROVED Notion was
made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of
the Regular Council Meeting of February 22, 1994.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HOLLY HILL ESTATES (5020 BLAKE ROAD)
CONTINUED TO APRIL 4. 1994 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Holly Hill
Estates located at 5020 Blake Road. He said the subject property is a developed
single dwelling unit lot containing an area of 68,771 square feet. The existing
dwelling is located on the easterly portion of the property and the home is
currently served by two curb cuts on Blake Road.
The subdivision proposal would create one, new buildable lot. The dimensions and
lot sizes as proposed are:
Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area
Lot 1 214 feet 238 feet 30,484 square feet
Lot 2 (existing home) 148 feet 251 feet 38,519 square feet
Lots within the 500 foot neighborhood, as established by the Zoning Ordinance,
yield the following dimensions and sizes:
Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area
115 feet 177 feet 19,250 square feet
Both lots would exceed the neighborhood medians and no variances are required.
The proposed location for the new dwelling would be on a relatively flat area on
the westerly portion of the property. Tree removal to develop the new lot would
be minimal. The proposal also anticipates separating the existing double drive
to serve the new house. The curb cuts on Blake Road would remain as they exist
today.
The Planning Commission heard the proposal on January 5, 1994, and recommended
preliminary plat approval, subject to: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision
dedication, and 3) utility connection charges.
Presentation by Proponent
John Zwicke, 5020 Blake Road, proponent, submitted that the proposed subdivision
meets all the criteria, would be a very nice lot aesthetically, would maintain
the existing setting and would not interfere with any other properties including
the existing home.
Mayor Richards asked Mr. Zwicke when he began the process leading to the proposed
subdivision, and also when the northerly curb cut was put in and the distance
from the bend in Blake Road to Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Zwicke responded that
he began the subdivision planning last fall. Both of the existing curb cuts have
been there for many years and that it was approximately 250 feet from the roadway
bend to Interlachen Boulevard.
Member Rice asked about the existing bituminous turnaround, where the proposed
building pad would be for the new house and trees to be removed. Mr. Zwicke
explained that the asphalt would -be removed, that only two trees would be removed
and additional trees would be added for privacy. He said the preliminary plan
illustrates the approximate area where the new house would go. Continuing,
Member Rice asked the proposed size and height for the new house and if it would
be comply with the height restriction and setback requirements. Mr. Zwicke
indicated that the house would be approximately 5,000 -6,000 square feet and is
proposed to be two stories in height. Planner Larsen said the Zoning Ordinance
restricts dwellings to a maximum height of 30 feet as measured from ground level
at the front of the dwelling. The front yard setback was discussed by the
Planning Commission and it was explained that because of the lot layout, the
front yard setback would take into account only the homes on either side of the
subject property and a setback of 65 feet would be required.
Public Comment
Steven Gilmore, 5025 Scriver Road, said that he lives directly behind the
existing dwelling on the subject property. He asked if the existing woods would
be disturbed and when construction would start. Mr. Zwicke pointed out that a 13
inch oak tree, an old peach tree and pine tree would be removed for the building
site but none of the remaining trees would be disturbed. Regarding commencement
of construction, he said that is unknown at this time.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Richards asked Mr. Zwicke how he proposed to handle the reduction in
special assessment for the Blake Road project that he had requested and been
granted at the assessment hearing held in October, 1993, while anticipating the
proposed subdivision. Mr. Zwicke argued that he would be assessed that
indirectly in terms of added taxes for the new lot. Member Smith interjected .
that the special assessment had nothing to do with property tax or park
dedication and had he known the full circumstances he would not have agreed to
the special assessment reduction.
Regarding the proposed subdivision, Mayor Richards said he had a concern about
traffic safety considering that the northerly curb cut is located on the curve of
the roadway. Further, that it may be premature to act upon this proposal when
the adjacent Boos property to the north may undergo development in the near
future. Member Rice said he concurred and recalled that when the Blake Road
improvement project was discussed there were safety concerns relative to curb
cuts and traffic capacity.
Member Kelly asked if action on the proposed plat could be delayed so that
further engineering opinion could be provided. Planner Larsen said there is an
imposed time limit but staff feels it does not apply in this case because after
the Planning Commission meeting Mr. Zwicke said he would be out of town and asked
that the matter be tabled until his return, in effect waiving the normal time in
which the Council must act. Attorney Gilligan confirmed that the time period is
120 days which has been waived by the proponent. Member Kelly asked Mr. Zwicke
if he had a buyer for the new undeveloped lot and if delaying action would hold
up a potential sale. Mr. Zwicke said no to the question.
Mr. Zwicke said it is obvious that development of the property is not the concern
but whether the Council feels the assessment was unfairly reduced. If there were
a safety issue problem the angle of the road would have been changed when
reconstructed. He said he was willing, upon final approval of the subdivision,
to give back the amount of the assessment reduction. He reiterated that the
proposal meets all the criteria for subdivision required by the Zoning Ordinance,
no objection was raised by City staff previously, and the Planning Commission
approved it.
Mayor Richards made a motion to continue the hearing on preliminary plat for
Holly Hill Estates to April 4, 1994, and to request the Engineering Department to
come back with comments relative to the traffic issues and information on
potential development of the property to the north and vest. Motion was seconded
by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING. MATTER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was
seconded by Member Smith setting March 21, 1994, as hearing date for the
following Plaffiing matter:
1) Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Commercial District, PCD -4 and Single Dwelling
Unit District, R -1 to Planned Residence District, PRD -4 (4101 West 50th Street,
5014, 5016 and 5024 Halifax Avenue)
Motion carried on rollcall °vote - five ayes:
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELEASING AGREEMENT FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION RELATING TO
PARKfi0OD KNOLLS 21ST ADDITION Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded
by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION RELEASING PARKLAND DEDICATION AGREEMENT
PARKWOOD KNOLLS 21ST ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows:
1. Recitals. By Agreement dated July 24, 1972, (the "Agreement ") and filed
November 8, 1972, in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as
Document No. 1052064, Carl M. Hansen, Helen N. Hansen and Parkwood Knolls
Construction Company entered into an agreement with the City of Edina relating to
dedication of parkland or payment of money in lieu thereof. All obligations
under the Agreement as they relate to Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, have been fully performed.
2. Release. The City of Edina hereby fully and absolutely releases said
Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition from the Agreement and all obligations thereunder
and authorizes the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles to remove the memorial of
the Agreement from all Certificates of Title in Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition.
The Mayor and Manager are authorized to execute such instruments and documents as
may be necessary to evidence the release of Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition from
the Agreement and the Clerk is authorized to file a certified copy of this
Resolution in the Hennepin County Real Estate Record.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -4 AMENDING CITY CODE BY REPEALING PARAGRAPH R.4 OF SUBSECTION
1230.02 (AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF PROVISION ALLOYING PUSHCARTS IN THE 50TH &
FRANCE C014KMCIAL AREA AND PROVIDING LIMIT ON NUMBER OF PERMITS) ADOPTED ON
SECOND READING Assistant Manager Hughes recalled that on February 22, 1994, the
Council granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 1994 -4 to repeal the sunset
provision allowing pushcarts in the 50th & France Commercial Area. The Council
asked the 50th & France Business and Professional Association to offer comments
concerning pushcarts in the 50th & France Commercial Area and limitation on
number of permits.
The Association reviewed the proposed ordinance and would recommend that the
total number of pushcarts allowed at any one time be limited to not more than
six. Marty Rud, Association President, was present and encouraged the Council to
adopt the ordinance as recommended.
Member Rice moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1994 -4 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY REPEALING
PARAGRAPH R.4 OF SUBSECTION 1230.02 (AUTOMATIC TERMINATION
OF PROVISION ALLOYING PUSHCARTS IN THE 50TH & FRANCE
COMMERCIAL AREA) AND PROVIDING A NEW PARAGRAPH R.4 OF
SUBSECTION 1230.02 (LIMIT ON NUMBER OF PERMITS)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph R.4 of Subsection 1230.02 of Section 1230 of the City
Code is repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. Subsection 1230.02 of Section 1230 of the City Code is amended
by providing a new paragraph R.4 as follows:
"4. The number of permits which may be in force under this Paragraph R. at
any one time shall not exceed six."
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage
and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
CONCERN VOICED REGARDING GARBAGE REMOVAL AND RENTED COSTS George Topor, 5709
Kemrich Drive, stated that he had asked to be on the Council Agenda to address
the subject of garbage removal in Edina and its costs. He said Edina has an open
hauling system whereby the residents can chose service from four licensed
haulers. Certain other cities have organized hauling whereby bids are solicited
and the bid is awarded to one hauler who provides the service to the entire city.
Mr. Topor said that St. Louis Park residents under the one hauler system pay
approximately $120.00 per year less than residents in Edina due in part to
Edina's requirement for pickup at the garage.
Mr. Topor asked that the Council consider looking at Edina's present system with
the goal of improving the service while lowering the costs, i.e. reducing
garbage, increasing recycling, bi- weekly service, illegal dumping, incentive to
haulers.
Mayor Richards told Mr. Topor that the Council through the years had debated,
discussed and held a number of views on Edina's system for garbage collection.
One issue the Council has shown unanimity on is the open hauling system. There
have been heated public hearings every time the issue of having a one hauler
system has been considered. The Council has also debated the issue of whether
collection should be at curb side or garage side, recognizing that there is added
cost for garage side pickup, and has not had a unanimous opinion on that issue.
Mayor Richards said it is important to continue to review how garbage is
collected in the City which is being done by the Recycling and Solid Waste
Commission on an ongoing basis.
Mr. Topor suggested that the Council consider soliciting responses from Edina
residents on the one hauler system versus open hauling system through a note with
their water bills.
Member Smith commented that he would not support polling the community. He
suggested that the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission discuss these issues
and get input from the haulers. Member Rice observed that many of the questions
raised by Mr. Topor have been studied and the data would still hold as to quotes,
etc. Member Paulus mentioned that about two years ago the issue of one hauler
versus open hauling was studied in depth. The consensus of both the Council and
the general public was not to get involved in a one hauler system as residents
preferred to select their own individual haulers.
Following lengthy discussion, Member Kelly made a motion that the Recycling and
Solid Waste Commission look into the issues that have been raised by Mr. Topor
and bring back recommendations to Council on April 4. 1994, based on facts and
discussions with the licensed garbage haulers /recyler. Motion was seconded by
Mayor Richards. Member Rice said he would support the motion with the proviso
that the Commission first look at the 1991 report to see if there have been any
changes relating to that data.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CONCERN VOICED REGARDING MASSAGE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Mitchell Wherley, owner
of Spalon Montage, 3909 West 49 1/2 Street, said he had asked to be on the
Council Agenda to propose a change to Subsection 1340.02, Subd. 3, C. of the City
Code which stipulates that no more than two persons licensed to perform massage
shall perform such massage at any one time on the business premises. The change
proposed would remove paragraph C. entirely from the ordinance. Mr. Wherley said
that Spalon Montage is a day spa as well as a full service salon and has
experienced consistent growth. They would like to expand their spa services
which includes massage because of the popularity of these services. Mr. Wherley
pointed out even with anticipated expanded sales of massage the company would not
exceed the limitation of 25% gross revenue from massage required by the City's
ordinance.
Member Rice asked Mr. Wherley what number of persons he would suggest could
perform massage at any one time if the Council were inclined to change the
ordinance. Mr. Wherley responded that raising the limitation to three or four
persons would be great.
Member Smith said he would agree to looking at the proposed change but would be
uncomfortable with lifting the limitation entirely.
It was the consensus of the Council that staff should review the request, check
with other cities who issue massage licenses as to their regulations, and bring
recommendations back to Council on April 4, 1994.
*BID AWARDED FOR CARPET FOR BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE LOUNGES Motion was made by Member
Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for carpet for Braemar
Clubhouse lounges to recommended low bidder, Anser's New Carpet Design, at
$6,701.72.
Motion carried on rollcall vote; five ayes.
PUBLIC ErsR7NG HELD ON PERMIT APPLICATION TO KEEP EXTRA DOGS /CATS'AT 4737
HIBISCUS AVENUE Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed
on file. Mayor Richards stated that this is the first public hearing on a permit
application to keep extra dogs and cats following amendment.of the City's
ordinance to establish such permit process.
Presentation by Applicant
William Wright, 4737 Hibiscus Avenue, stated that in order to have more than
three dogs or cats in the aggregate as allowed by City ordinance, he had applied
for a permit to keep three dogs and three cats as identified in the application.
He noted that one dog (cockapoo) ran away and has been missing since November,
1993.
Mayor Richards asked Mr. Wright to characterize the animals and their habits.
Mr. Wright stated that only one of the three cats goes outside and only for brief
periods of time. The dogs are allowed out in the backyard which opens out to the
lake. When out, the golden retrievers will bark if left out for any length of
time or if some strange person or dog comes along.
Public Comment
Charles Hansing, 4741 Hibiscus Avenue, said he has lived at that address for 15
years, is directly north of the Wrights, and that over the years his various
neighbors have had pets. He spoke to an outline which he presented to the
Council which included comments on legal issues, property issues, ordinance
questions, obligations of pet owners to neighbors. He argued that the ordinance
grants special rights at the expense of others and does not provide equal rights
for all property owners. Further, it places the burden of proof on the neighbor
rather than the applicant. Pets are really a nuisance if they are not controlled
by their owner at all times or left unattended inside or out; especially barking
dogs at certain times of the day. Mr. Hansing said that he felt the Council
should set the rules and regulations and enforce compliance whether it be for one
or six animals. Also, that neighbors should not have to -keep calling to report
non - compliance.
Mayor Richards asked Mr. Hansing if he felt the permit to keep extra dogs /cats
should be granted to the Wrights. Mr. Hansing said he felt this is a test case,
that the issues he has raised should be addressed before action is taken on this
permit. As to the permit, he said if granted it would impinge on his property
rights. Member Paulus interjected that the City has a nuisance ordinance that
would deal with barking dogs and other issues such as health. Member Rice said
he agreed that the neighbors should not have to report nuisances; however, that
is how the system works. Someone has to call the City and report ordinance
violations.
George Topor, 5709 Kemrich Drive, said he had not seen the ordinance but in
listening to the testimony he wondered if there is anything in the ordinance
about the number of complaints against a pet owner, over a specified period of
time, that could result in a permit being suspended.
Member Paulus called point of order and said further comment should be limited
specifically to the matter of the permit application under consideration.
Member Paulus made a motion that staff be directed to prepare findings for
consideration by the Council on March 21, 1994, in support of granting the
Wrights a permit to keep the two dogs and three cats at 4737 Hibiscus Avenue as
described in the application. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Member Smith asked what control the Council would have once a permit is issued.
Attorney Gilligan responded that, as provided in the ordinance, the Council could
impose conditions, i.e. if the ordinance were violated the permit could be
pulled.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON SMOKE DETECTORS IN DWELLING UNITS Chief Paulfranz summarized his
report dated March 3, 1994 on the subject of smoke detectors in dwelling units as
follows. He said estimates indicate that 20 percent of the dwellings in
Minnesota do not have detectors, and of the 80 percent that do, only 30 percent
of those detectors are operational. Of special concern is that the elderly are
one of the high -risk groups.
Presently in Edina, smoke detectors are required by the Building Code in all new
and remodeled dwellings. The Fire Department has as inspection program for
existing apartment and condominium buildings. A new project jointly sponsored by
the Edina Rotary, the Local Fire Union, and the Fire Department is development of
a smoke detector "give away" program. This project is designed to assist people
who cannot afford the equipment.
Several areas of concern require more attention:
1. Public awareness and concern - particularly with battery replacement and
testing.
2. Responsibility and authority of condominium associations. These associations
should install, service and maintain all smoke detectors within their
building.
3. Detectors installed in existing R -1 dwellings should be "hard wired" design.
Present State Statute prevents requiring this except in single family homes.
4. Fire protection goals and key issues identified by the Governor's Council on
Fire Prevention and Control should receive support.
Member Smith asked if insurance companies reduce premiums as an incentive if
dwelling units are hard wired. Chief Paulfranz said he was not aware of a
premium break for hard wired detectors versus battery operated, but insurance
companies do give credit for homes with smoke detectors. He noted that retro -fit
to hard wired detectors is difficult but the Fire Department does encourages
property owners to use hard wired detectors. Member Smith asked if this could be
required when a home is being remodeled extensively. Chief Paulfranz said those
are required whenever a remodeling job is over $1,000 in value.
Member Rice said he would support a change in State Statute that would require
hard wired detectors in multi -unit buildings. Chief Paulfranz said that, in
general, owners of rental multi -unit properties go with hard wired smoke
detectors because it reduces maintenance cost. The primary problem lies with
condominiums where the Fire Department has to deal with multiple owners and there
is no association to bring them together. No formal action was taken on the
report.
REPORT PRESENTED ON VATERMAIN BREAKS /SANITARY SEVM BACKUPS: POLICY DISCUSSED
Presentation by Engineer
Engineer Hoffman recalled that at the last meeting the Council was advised of a
recent major watermain break in the area of West 70th Street/Wooddale Avenue with
sanitary sewer backup occurring in a number of the area homes. Staff was asked
to provide background information so a policy could be discussed. A review of
records for the past 14 years indicated that there were 256 watermain breaks and
approximately 167 sanitary system plugs or malfunctions. These incidents were
due to a variety of causes and did result in property damage in some cases
ranging from slight to severe.
The watermain breaks usually occurred in the winter and breaks in the smaller six
inch mains usually caused no damage. Staff could identify five large main breaks
over this period and where damage did occur because of the high volume of water.
Of the 423 water and'sewer events, 47 claims were filed and sent to the City's
insurance carrier;_ 22 claims resulted in some payment. Most of the incidents
caused no damage or only minor sewer backup in utility rooms resulting in no
claim being submitted.
The City carries liability insurance, not property damage insurance. A review of
insurance summaries from July 1980 to July 1990 indicated that all claims
submitted to the City were for either property damage or water-related incidents.
Only 47 claims were identified resulting from sewer or water problems; however,
staff believes some of the other claims listed as property damage may have been
due to sewer /water problems.
When watermain /sanitary sewer incidents occur the procedure is as follows:'
1) Department is notified of incident.
2) Utility staff locates and corrects problem.
3) If property damage occurred, staff advises the property owner to file the
information with the City Administration Department.
4) Administration advises the City's insurance company of the claim.
5) Insurance company adjustor contacts City utility staff to determine what
happened on the specific incident.
6) Insurance company advises property owner as to acceptance or denial of
the claim.
Staff has contacted other suburban communities to ascertain how they dealt with
similar situations. Most followed the same procedure; however, three suburbs
hired a cleaning service for cleanup but did not pay for property replacement.
One suburb paid for replacement property on a case by case basis. This was a
newer suburb with very few incidents and piping system less than 30 years old.
Staff would offer the following possible alternatives in establishing a City
policy for this type of incident:
1) Continue to follow past procedure.
2) Adopt policy of paying for cleanup service for damages of $500 - $1000
without liability indemnification.
3) Adopt policy of paying for cleanup service for damages of $500 - $1000
with liability indemnification.
4) Some other combination.
Staff recommendation: Review issue and develop policy in concert with the City's
insurance company.
Staff also looked at the following two questions:
A. How is the City's liability determined? The City is covered for water
related losses through its general liability policy. The City's liability is
assessed to determine if the City was negligent in either design of the
sewer /water systems or failure to maintain the systems adequately. When a claim
is reviewed, the adjustor looks at design criteria, talks to the claimant and
interviews City staff regarding work that has been done in the area of the system
failure. In 95 percent of the claims the insurance company will pay some portion
up to all of the claim if the City has done any work in the area around the time
the loss occurred. If the City has done no work in the area the claim is usually
denied.
B. Is there an insurance product available for property damage coverage when the
City is not liable? The City's insurance agent found that there is nothing in
the market available for coverage of this type. However, the City could probably
find a company that could design a specific policy to cover property damage
claims. Cost for this type of coverage would be extremely expensive. If the
City were interested in providing such coverage, it would be much more cost
effective to self- insure for this type of claim.
Public Comment
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the subject of the City's policy
relating to private property damage. Specifically, should the City,.without any
question of negligence or liability, adopt a policy that would pay for private
property damage from the City's general fund?
John Straub, 4520 Andover Road, spoke to his claim for property damage resulting
from the recent watermain break on West 70th Street. He asked specific questions
on how the City's insurance company made their decision not to pay the claim. In
answer to the question of City policy, Mr. Straub said the City should not pay -
the insurance company should pay.
Dr. Ralph Boss, 6901 West Shore Drive, said he had sewer backup from the
watermain break on West 70th street. According to the information presented, in
the past the City's insurance company has paid claims up to $1,000. However, in
the recent watermain break there were massive losses of up to $25,000. He said
he felt the City should decide on paying for property damage on a case by case
basis.
Virginia Schaefer, 4521 Andover Road, asked the amount of premium the City pays
to the St. Paul Companies, what type of claims they pay and how many homes were
involved in the recent watermain break. Staff responded that the premium is
approximately $125,000 for general liability /automobile insurance combined, the
type of claims paid in the past has varied, and that approximately 10 -12 homes
were affected by the recent break.
Robert Backes, 4701 Dunberry Lane, told Council that they had significant damage
from the recent break, approximately $25,000, because they were in the process of
remodeling their basement. As to policy, he said at a minimum the City should
pay for cleanup, and payment for damages should be considered on a case by case
basis.
Gayle Anderson, 7000 Wooddale Avenue, said she incurred a cleanup bill of
approximately $1,000. Both the City's insurance company and her homeowners
insurance carrier denied the claim. She said the City should carry insurance
that would cover this type of private property damage, knowing these types of
incidents occur.
Ruby Boss, 6901 West Shore Drive, informed Council that their basement was
inundated by the recent watermain break. She said she felt the City has an
obligation to pay for all damage costs in cases like this and that she would be
willing to pay extra property taxes to.take care of property owners who
experience such losses.
Mark Ettinger, 7007 West Shore Drive, said he was affected by the recent
watermain break and felt the City should assume responsibility on a case by case
basis for the reason that the City may be improperly insured for this type of
occurrence.
Marisue Nibe, 4525 West 70th Street, told Council they had 10 inches of sewage in
their basement from the recent break. The carpeting and most of the furniture
was damaged and their cost just to get the sewage out was $2,095. She questioned
whether the City was adequately maintaining the watermain system..
- George Topor, 5709 Kemrich Drive, suggested that the City consider a policy of
self- insurance for these kinds of losses by spreading the cost of the annual
"premium" among the total households in the City.
Council Action
Member Kelly made a motion that the matter of policy for utility incidents be
continued to April 18, 1994, so that Council could reflect on comments that have
been made and to allow staff to refine policy alternatives in concert with the
City's insurance company. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED• HEARING DATE OF 04/04/94 SET FOR PARKLAWN AVENUE
IMPROVEMENT BA -303 (CENTENNIAL LADS PHASE II) Motion was made by Member Kelly
and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
CENTENNIAL IBS PHASE II - PABKIAWN AVENUE ROADWAY & BRIDGE
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -303
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, April 4, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time.
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not
less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all
affected properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE II - PARKLAWN AVENUE ROADWAY A BRIDGE
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -303
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, April 4. 1994,
at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed
under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429:
Centennial Lakes Phase II - Parklawn Avenue Roadway & Bridge
The approximate cost of said improvements is estimated to be $2,047,616.
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost.of proposed
improvements includes: Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Outlot A, Outlot B. and Outlot C.
The Crescent at Centennial Lakes; and Outlot E, South Edina Development Addition.
The properties are proposed to be assessed at $1.39 per square foot.
Marcella M. Dashn
City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING PARKLAWN AVENUE AS STATE AID STREET Motion was
made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAY
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Edina that the street
hereinafter described shall be designated a Municipal State Aid Street under the
provisions of Minnesota Law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
road described as follows, to -wit:
Parklawn Avenue between France Avenue (CSAH 17) and York Avenue (CSAH 31)
be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State Aid
Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of
Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of
Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the
designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved
and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Edina, to be
numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Street 174.
ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
Mayor
ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Assistant Manager Hughes advised-Council
that staff would recommend renewal of on -sale wine licenses for the following
restaurants: Q. Cumbers, Ruby Tuesday, Szechuan Star, Two Guys from Italy,
Pizzeria Uno, Hawthorn Suites, The Tour Cafe, Ciatti's, Boundary Waters
Restaurant, Good Earth Restaurant, Pantry Restaurant and Empress Restaurant.
Staff would further recommend that action-on the license renewal for Mick's
Southale be continued to March 21, 1994, because of concerns related to a recent
inspection.
Eric Olson, Fred Burstein and Associates, stated that he was local counsel for
Mick's Southdale and had talked with Assistant Manager Hughes regarding the
City's concerns with the recent inspection at which a 17 year old was served wine
without asking age. He said Mick's is a first class organization, wants to be a
good citizen, is extremely concerned about the incident and wants to take any
steps necessary to ensure that it will not be repeated. Mr. Olson said Mick's
has authorized him to meet with City staff to discuss the incident, to work on
any education necessary for Mick's employees to make sure it stays an isolated
incident.
Member Smith made a motion to approve on -sale wine license renewals for the
following restaurants: Q.Cumbers, Ruby Tuesday, Szechuan Star, Two Guys from
Italy, Pizzeria Uno, Hawthorn Suites, The Tour Cafe, Ciatti's, Dayton's Boundary
Waters Restaurant, Good Earth Restaurant, Pantry Restaurant and Empress
Restaurant, and to continue action on the license renewal for Mick's Southdale to
the Council Meeting of March 21, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor Richards
advised that Diane Klein Smith, 5836 Creek Valley Road, had applied for
appointment to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee. She would serve
on the Committee as a provider because-by profession she is a school nurse.
Member Rice made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Diane Klein
Smith to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term to
February 1, 1996. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve club on sale and. - Sunday
liquor license renewals for Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
RICHFIELD INFORMATION MEETING ON AIRPORT 4 -22 EXTENSION SCHEDULED FOR 04/10/94
Assistant Manager Hughes noted that the City of Richfield has scheduled an
informational briefing regarding their review of the Revised Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the 4 -22 airport extension. The meeting will be on March 10
at 8:00 A.M. at Richfield City Hall and staff and elected officials have been
invited to participate. Richfield is pushing for legal action to prevent the
runway extension. He told Council that Planner Craig Larsen would attend and if
Council Members planned to go they should so indicate.
CLAIMS PAID Member Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 3, 1994, and
consisting of 25 pages: General Find $200.565.14; C.D.B.G. $1,035.00;
Communication $21,782.35; Working Capital $4,396.25; Art Center $5,503.86;
Golf Course $48,119.35; Ice Arena $4,341.07; Gun Range $872.30;
Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $16,120.71; Utility Fund $277,793.94; Storm Sewer
$5,198.10; Recycling $39,949.08; Liquor Fund $41,289.29; Construction Fund
$11,541.77; TOTAL $678,508.21. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 11:05 P.M.
City Clerk
t 1N�-eA
>' 0
J• `N�Rd10M'4O/
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosla „u
From: Craig Larsen
Date: March 21, 1994
Subject: Z- 94 --1. Prelimina
Rezoning, PCD--4. _Plabned
Commercial and R-'1. Single
Dw_elling_ Unit District Lo
PRD° _ 4 . Planned Residence Dst_.
5014 501.6. 50__24 Halifax Ave
and _410.1 West_ 50th Screet.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
II_
A .
Consent
C1
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends preliminary rezoning approval with the
following conditions:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Replatting of the Property
3. Amendment of Comprehensive Plan
4. Amendment of 50th and France Plan
5. Vacation of portion of alley
6. Watershed District permit
7. Lot coverage variance (5.3 %) and setback variance (27.5 feet).
8. Landscaping plan, building materials description, drop -off detail, and traffic
analysis at time of final rezoning.
INFO /BACKGROUND
Attached to this cover are:
1. Planning Commission draft minutes, staff report and plans for proposal heard by
Commission on March 2, 1994.
2. Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans from proposal considered
at the February 2, 1994 meting. The initial proposal called for a 24 unit, four story
building on the FINA site plus the adjacent two lots.
3. Correspondence received from neighboring property owners.
LOCATION MAP
1 463;
1 1 -
-_j
-.r--
4904
i 4905
I 4901
4908
=
-�
4903
_J
-�
I 4905
4912 !
4915
4916 -20
-
490%
4916
1 491'
3948 3944 13940 3936 3922 -30 13918
- - -
'
i
1 4909
-
4920
`-
4921
49 1/2 ST w
-
--
-J
3935 i- T j
4624
4911
1 4924 j
4925
1 4915
4928 1
4929
1
I q
�—
�—
j 4917
4932
14945 1
l r-I
1
r-
Iii
4919
4936
14220 14200 1 4120
4100 3948
- - °! 3926 13922 13914 i 39061
--1�
-1 50TH ST M
-� -T T _ T
4215 4211 4- 4121 1 4101 3945 l
j 201 I ol�f III 391! 13901 09
5001
mlml��l� Ali; I
W
! 5003
5000 -1 e j
1 5005 j
{ P 5016 5017 5014
1 5007 5020 I 3943
F 5009 5024 5021 5016 5020
7 5011 1 � z 025 � 5021 I 3926
l2 ` 501 3 \ 15032 1 5028 j 5029 5 I 5022-_ 36 1 LL
114 ,1 1 5015 5036 ST " 1 5050
1 5040 1 5033 5032 1075 �Si \ —
16 1 5017 .-
r- 5101 5100
5019 5014 i 5037 5036 1 j
18 I- 1
�( 51ST ST 1 5105 5104 w
I + I
5101 5100), 1 —~ 1 5101 5100 j 5101
5109 1 51 D8 5101 5f 00
- - i -" -� % 5105 S1D4 5105
5103
- 5104 5113 5112 1 1 5105 5104 i = 1 I 5100
5109 5108 5109
5107 L 5108 1 1 5111 i 5116 j` 5109 5108 1 5115 5112 1 1 5113 j
r5f09 �� 51121 � 1 5121 i 5f 20 I ` i 5113 j 5111 1 i 5111 �5S1B 5 � � 5112 1
r-- - -�- _ - -1
I � � 5121 � 5116
REZONING
NUMBER Z -94 -1
L O C A T 10 N South of West 50th Street and west of Halifax
Avenue
REQUEST PCD -4, Planned Commercial District, R -1,
Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -4,
Planned Residence District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 1994
7:30 P.M., EDINA COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, Nan Faust, Ann
Swenson, Lee Johnson, David Runyan, Charles
Ingwalson
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Commissioner Swenson moved
meeting minutes. Commissioner
voted aye; motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
approval of the February 2, 1994,
Faust seconded the motion. All
Z -94 -1 PCD -4 Planned Commercial District and
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -4, Planned Residence District
Property
Address: 4101 West 50th Street, and 5014, 5016, and, 5024
Halifax Avenue
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission on February 2, 1994, the
Commission reviewed a four story, 24 unit multi - family
redevelopment of the subject properties. The proposal was
continued to allow the developer time to address several issues,
including building height, density, lot coverage, setbacks and
exterior design.
The proponent has submitted revised plans which differ in
several ways from the initial plan. First, additional land has
been added to the site. Adding the third single dwelling lot adds
nearly 10,000 square feet, resulting in a site size of 48,115
square feet. Second, unit count is increased from 24 to 28 units.
Third, the building has been lowered from four to three stories.
Finally, the exterior has been further detailed and more bays have
been added.
Mr. Larsen explained all aspects of the proposal meet
ordinance standards except on lot coverage which requires a 5.3%
variance and building setback.
Mr. Larsen said he continued to believe the proposed land use
1
to be appropriate, and that it is desirable to include the gas
station in the residential redevelopment. Reducing the height of
the building and adding the additional land result in a development
much closer to full zoning compliance than the previous plan. Only
a setback variance from Halifax Avenue and a lot coverage variance
remain. The - three other multifamily buildings in the area required
similar or greater variances. The density of the proposed
development now complies with allowed PRD -4 density, and is at the
high end of the density suggested in the 50th and France Avenue
Plan. The density is now the same as the Regency and significantly
less than White Oaks and the Lanterns.
The revised plan also provides an increased building setback
and green space buffer area along the southerly property line.
Mr. Larsen concluded he recommends Preliminary Rezoning
approval including the requested variances with the following
conditions:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Replatting of the Property
3. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan
4. Amendment of the 50th and France Avenue Plan
5. Vacation of portion of alley
6. Watershed District permit
The proponent, Mr. Mark Haymaker was present. Mr. John
Nissen, Architect was also present.
Commissioner Faust pointed out the plan proposed to vacate the
alley way and questioned what will happen with the rest of the
alley. Mr. Larsen explained the remainder of the alley will remain
as is.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if the remainder of the
alley can be paved up to the proposed visitor parking area. Mr.
Larsen said that is a possibility. Mr. Larsen explained a separate
hearing is required to vacate the alley, and that suggestion can be
brought up'at that time.
Chairman Johnson questioned the increase in units from 24 to
28.
Mr. Larsen explained when the proponent acquired the 10,000
square foot residence at 5024 Halifax that acquisition allowed the
developer (by ordinance requirements) the potential to increase the
amount of units.
Commissioner Faust said she is concerned because there does
not appear to be a drop -off entry /exit depicted anywhere on the
revised plans. Mr. Larsen acknowledged that point and said those
issues are technical and can be addressed at final approval.
2
Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the planning
commission will review the proposal for final. Mr. Larsen
explained this evening the proponents are requesting preliminary
rezoning. The planning commission will re- consider the proposal
for final rezoning, and at that time loose ends are tightened up,
such as landscaping, building materials, entrances /exits, etc.
Mr. Larsen said in response to Commissioner Faust's question
regarding a drop -off area, that it is the obligation of the City to
ensure there is a drop -off location that is legal by ADA standards
and is safe.
Mr. John Nissen introduced himself and explained to commission
members with the acquisition of the property located at 5024
Halifax Avenue the density of the project was reduced and the
height of the building was decreased from four to three stories.
Mr. Nissen explained it is very important to them to construct a
building that has a strong residential quality. He pointed out the
building has been broken into three different masses, more windows
and bay windows have also been added to soften the mass of the
building which was a concern expressed by commission members.
Continuing, Mr. Nissen said this proposal eliminates five existing
curb cuts on Halifax Avenue, and traffic should be reduced with the
elimination of three homes and the gas station. Mr. Nissen told
the commission everything possible will be done to save the
existing trees, and landscaping will be provided as a buffer to the
residential homes and to soften the facade. Mr. Nissen concluded
that the proposal is an attempt to balance the commercial
developments of this neighborhood from the single dwelling homes.
Commissioner Ingwalson asked. Mr. Haymaker what the building
materials will consist off. Mr. Haymaker said at present we are
considering using brick with stucco or decorative concrete.
Commissioner Johnson questioned Mr. Haymaker on entrance to
the underground parking. Mr. Haymaker stated the site has a slight
grade change and the entrance will be located at the south end.
Mr. Nissen interjected the drive will slope down to enter into the
garages.
Commissioner Johnson said one concern of his is to ensure that
the grading plan has been thoroughly reviewed and approved by the
engineering department before construction could begin.
Commissioner Johnson said another point of concern is that the west
elevation of the building should also be aesthetically pleasing.
Continuing, Commissioner Johnson questioned where the main entrance
will be located, and pointed out when visitors park in the visitor
parking area they will not want to walk around to the front of the
building to gain access. Mr. Nissen agreed adding a buzzer
security system could be implemented in the rear entrances as well
as the front entrance to allow visitors access. Mr. Nissen
explained all the technical details have not been solved.
3
Mr. Randy Hassen, 5133 Halifax Avenue told commission members
he is concerned with increased traffic and more vehicular traffic
using Halifax Avenue. Mr. Nissen responded the proposed plan has
all visitor parking entering from West 50th Street which should
prevent visitors from using Halifax Avenue.
Ms. Carol Ryan, 5115 Halifax Avenue questioned if it would be
possible to limit the number of cars per condominium unit. She
said overflow parking from Lunds, and the movie theatre end up on
Halifax Avenue, and- she doesn't want to see overflow from the
condo's ending up on Halifax also. Mr. Haymaker explained the
proposal meets the parking requirements of the city, and he feels
the number of parking spaces allotted for visitors will be
adequate.
Chairman Johnson stated he believes the future occupants of
the condominium will be middle aged or above so there will probably
be less than two cars per unit. Chairman Johnson suggested if
overflow parking continues to be a problem Lunds and the movie
theatre managers should be notified.
Sharon Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue, told members in her
opinion the visitor parking lot will be hard to access and
questioned the change in elevations within the site.
A discussion ensued regarding the grade change of the site
with Mr. Nissen pointing out at the northwest corner the elevation
is 8891, 50th and Halifax 8881, southeast corner 8821, southwest
corner 884' and at street level 8811. In Summary Mr. Nissen
explained the highest elevation is 889' and the lowest point on
site is 8821. Mr. Haymaker interjected that the whole site will be
graded.
Ms. Maetzold stated another concern of hers is the drop -off
area. Usually drop -off areas are in front of the building and the
traffic in this area is difficult at best.
Mr. Nissen said they will work with the city and engineering
department to find the best drop -off point. He mused the best
drop -off point may be on the west elevation.
Mr. Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue stated at the previous
meeting he heard the developer state the proposed condominiums are
to be luxury. Mr. Maetzold added he has a concern that this
project could become low income housing. Mr. Haymaker responded
that it is his intent to construct luxury condominium. Continuing,
Mr. Maetzold said another concern of his is the possibly soil
contamination and he questioned who has the authority to give the
go -ahead to begin construction. Commissioner McClelland said the
site will be reviewed by the PCA, and soil tests will be obtained.
Mr. Larsen added if contamination is found, the site will have to
be "cleaned up" before construction begins. Mr. Haymaker
4
interjected that FINA -is responsible for any cleanup adding the
site may also fall under the "Superfund" which is an agency that
allows money to be used for environmental clean up. Concluding his
comments, Mr. Maetzold said traffic is heavy in this area, the
curve on West 51st street is blind, and dangerous, there is a
safety concern for future residents of the condominium that may
cross the street, and traffic may increase on Halifax as a result
of this proposal.
Ms. Maetzold asked Mr. Haymaker why there are more units in
this proposal. Mr. Haymaker said four units were added to maximize
the site.
In response to concerns expressed by residents in regards to
traffic, and grading, Chairman Johnson said the City Engineer, Fran
Hoffman, along with engineering staff will study the traffic
circulation as it relates to this proposal. The site will also be
carefully reviewed for grade changes and run -off potential.
Mr. Larsen agreed with comments from the Chairman adding, Mr.
Hoffman has reviewed the plans on a preliminary basis, and has
indicated he believes the elimination of the front drop -off (as
originally presented) is positive, with the suggestion that the
western facade of the building be studied for the drop -off point.
Mr. Larsen explained that presently there are no hard numbers on
the amount of traffic generated by the three single family homes
of and the gas station, but typically gas station use has been
calculated as the most intense commercial use, and at present
movement in and out of the existing gas station is not good at
best.
A discussion ensued between commission members, and residents
on how traffic flow will circulate as a result of this proposal.
Commissioner Runyan pointed out many assumptions are being made on
how people will get in and out of the site, and until concrete
final plans have been designed on where the drop -off will be, and
if the alley will be allowed to abut the parking lot, etc. all
comments are speculation.
Commissioner Faust suggested the possibility of a recessed
curb cut in front of the proposed building which will allow a drop -
off area. Mr. Larsen pointed out because of ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) rules for drop -offs have to meet specific
standards.
Mr. Fletcher, 5137 Halifax Avenue stated one concern of his is
the aesthetic quality of the building, and how the building will
relate to the street.
Mr. Smith, 5100 Halifax Avenue, voiced his concern over
traffic congestion and safety.
5
Ms. Smith, 5017 Indianola, asked the height of the building
along the west elevation. Mr. Nissen said the buildings height on
the west elevation is 37 1/2 feet. Ms. Smith asked if the setback
from the sidewalk has been calculated. Mr. Nissen stated the
building is probably 25 feet from the sidewalk. Ms. Smith
explained the reason she is concerned about setbacks, and building
height is because she feels she will be the only residential house
left is a "sea" of multi- housing buildings. She added in her
opinion the building is too tall, it will block off her property,
and her sunlight. She asked if the city could do something with
her property.
Ms. Lynn Griffith, 5124 Halifax Avenue, told the commission
she feels the proposed building is too high, too long, and
suggested that Mr. Haymaker reduce the number of units. Ms.
Griffith stated she has felt threatened by comments made at a
previous meeting that this project could become low income. Mr.
Haymaker explained all he wants to do is construct a good building.
He said the price of the land is high, and if he, or someone else
is not allowed to build a certain amount of units, city financial
assistance may be needed. Continuing, Mr. Haymaker said he
received many positive inquiries regarding this proposal, and
presently has eight potential buyers. Mr. Haymaker said comments
from many Edina residents has been they want to see the- site
cleaned up, pointing out the gas station, and the two homes FINA
owns have not been maintained as well as neighborhood standards.
Ms. Smith said she would like to see the site developed
without any variances, and questioned if Mr. Haymaker has thought
about security of the building.
Mr. Haymaker said at-present all plans are just preliminary,
and the details, such as security, will be ironed out once
preliminary approval is received.
'Chairman Johnson said much discussion has centered around
details, and questioned Mr. Haymaker if a neighborhood meeting has
been called. Mr. Haymaker said to date there no meeting with the
neighbors has occurred, adding he is willing to meet with
neighbors. Chairman Johnson stated it is a good idea to meet with
neighbors, and iron out some concerns.
Mr. John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue stated he feels a
neighborhood meeting is necessary, he said he has a concern with
the loss of trees, and wants some guarantee that the site will be
properly landscaped, and that the building will be aesthetically
pleasing with a strong residential character.
Commissioner Johnson questioned as he understands the rezoning
process what the commission is considering this evening is the
appropriateness of rezoning the site to a PRD district, and the
building density, number of units, variances, etc. Mr. Larsen said
C1
that is correct, entrances, building materials, landscaping, etc.
are considered at final approval.
Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion, this site is a key
location in Edina, and it is our duty to make sure the building
that is being constructed is a credit to the community.
Commissioner Runyan said what we really are being asked to
approve at this stage in the process is appropriateness of land
use. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. If the commission feels
rezoning the site from PCD, and R -I to PRD is appropriate they take
action to reflect that opinion. They must also decide if the site
is to be approved with variances.
Commissioner Ingwalson stated he wants some assurance that the
building that is constructed is a good building that is a credit to
Edina, and the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen explained the commission
can recommend any conditions they deem necessary at final rezoning
approval.
Commissioner Faust stated she has a real concern for Ms.
Smiths property adding she understands her anxiety that her home
will be surrounded by multi - residential buildings if this is
approved. Continuing, Commissioner Faust said in reality granting
the frontyard setback variance for the building is better for Ms.
Smiths property because it pulls the building away from the rear
property line, more toward the street. Commissioner Faust
concluded at final rezoning approval the commission can request
that the rear yard area of the building be appropriately landscaped
with overstory trees, and that a fence be constructed to screen the
building from property owners on Indianola.
Chairman Johnson commented there are times when granting a
variance makes sense.
Commissioner Swenson thanked everyone for participating in the
discussion, and stated the commission wants to be.sensitive to all
parties in the decision making process. Commissioner Swenson moved
to recommend preliminary rezoning approval subject to 1) final
rezoning approval, 2) replatting of the property 3) amendment to
the 50th and France Avenue Plan and Comprehensive Plan 4) Vacation
of alley, 5) watershed district permit, 6) a 5.3% lot coverage
variance, 7) a 27.5 foot east side setback variance, and 8)
landscaping, building materials, drop -off approval and traffic
study approval at final. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion.
All voted aye; motion carried.
7
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MARCH 2, 1994
Z -94 -1 PCD -4 Planned Commercial District and
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -4, Planned Residence District
General
Location: South of West 50th Street and west of Halifax
Avenue
Property
Address: 4101 West 50th Street, and 5014, 5016, and 5024
Halifax Avenue
On February 2, 1994, the Commission reviewed a four story, 24
unit multi - family redevelopment of the subject properties. The
proposal was continued to allow the developer time to address
several issues, including building height, density, lot coverage,
setbacks and exterior design.
The proponent has submitted revised plans which differ in
several ways from the initial plan. First, additional land has
been added to the site. Adding the third single dwelling lot adds
nearly 10,000 square feet, resulting in a site size of 48,115
square feet. Second, unit count is increased from 24 to 28 units.
Third, the building has been lowered from four to three stories.
Finally, the exterior has been further detailed and more bays have
been added.
Listed below is the Zoning Ordinance evaluation for the
revised proposal.
Density
Gross lot area required
per unit is 2,900 square feet
Credits:
Under building parking
500 square feet per space
up to 1.5 spaces per unit
Type I or II Construction
500 square feet per unit
81,200 square feet
- 21,000 square feet
- 14,000 square feet
Required Lot Area 46,200 square feet
Lot Area Provided
Building Coverage
Maximum Coverage Allowed
Proposed Coverage
Lot Coverage Variance
Building Setbacks
Minimum Setbacks
Setbacks Provided
48,115 square feet
30%
35.3%
5.3%
35 feet or building
height if greater
Setback Required
North
45
Feet
35 Feet
East
10
Feet
37.5 Feet
South
49
Feet
36 Feet
West
48
Feet
36 Feet
Variance required from east property line, all other setbacks
conform.
Parking
Required:
Covered Parking
Surface Parking
Total
Proposed:
Covered Parking
Surface
Total
No parking variance required.
50th and France Comprehensive Plans
1.25 per unit
.75 per unit
2.00 per unit
51 spaces or 1.82 per unit
14 spaces or .5 per unit
65 spaces or 2.32 per unit
As before the proposed plan would require amending both plans
to change the designation of the gas station site from Commercial
to High Density Residential. The three single dwelling lots carry
the High Density Residential designation.
Recommendation
I continue to believe the proposed land use to be appropriate,
and that it is desirable to include the gas station in the
residential redevelopment. Reducing the height of the building and
adding the additional land have resulted in a development much
closer to full zoning compliance than the previous plan. Only a
setback variance from Halifax Avenue and a lot coverage variance
remain. The three other multifamily buildings in the area required
similar or greater variances. The density of the proposed
development now complies with allowed PRD -4 density, and is at the
high end of the density suggested in the 50th and France Avenue
Plan. The density is now the same as the Regency and significantly
less than White Oaks and the Lanterns.
The changes in the plan result in a plan for which I would
recommend approval. I support approval of the Halifax setback and
the lot coverage variance. The increased lot coverage as a result
of reducing the building to three stories seems to be a reasonable
tradeoff.
The revised plan also provides an increased building setback
and green space buffer area along the southerly property line.
I recommend Preliminary Rezoning approval including the
requested variances with the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Final Rezoning
Replatting of the Property
Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment of the 50th and France Avenue Plan
Vacation of portion of alley
Watershed District permit
PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY HOUSING AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
EDINA MINNESOTA
V
358'
PROPOSED BUILDING
HALIFAX AVENUE SOUTH
SITE PLAN 0 10 20 40 6 -1 0
W
W
r--
NORTH
DATE 2/16/94
BERNARD HERMAN
ARC HIT EC
TS, INQ
oral ee le ICI if
tI pueal if if Lip" 11
NORTH ELEVATION 0 4t,0
PROJECT DATA
tlnalq - - I� a n n a
� �� tr n n ®'■1 o ee et
uhd
H■■��I
1
■ • ■
DESCRIPTION:
3 STORY CONDOMINIUM BLDG.
AND 1ASEMENT PARKING
BUILDING AREA:
1 FLOOR • 17,000 SF
3 FLOOR 17,000 SF/FLOOR • 51,000 SF
BASEMENT:
51 PARKING SPACES
REQUIRED PARKING:
28 UNITS X 2 SPACESIUNIT • 56 SPACES
1ST FLOOR:
8 UNITS • PARTY ROOM
PARKING PROVIDED:
51 SPACES INSIDE
i SPACES OUTSIDE
65 SPACES
2ND 8 3RD FLOORS: 10 UNITS EACH
TOTAL UNITS:
28
MINIMUM REQUIRED
OUTSIDE PARKING:
28 UNITS X 5 SPACESIl1NIT • 14 SPACES
OCCUPANCY:
R -1
REQUIRED LOT AREA
28 UNITS X 2.900 SFIUNIT • 81.200 SF
28 UNITS X -500 SFNNIT • -14.000 SF
(TYPE II CONSTRUCTION)
42 PK SPACES X .500 SF /SPACE • .21 C00 SF
TOTAL 46,200 SF
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE II 1 HOUR
BUILDING DIMENSIONS: 64' X 260'
BUILDING HEIGHT:
AVERAGE: 35'
HIGH END 36'
LOW END 33'
ENTRY 3T$
ACTUAL LOT AREA:
48.115 S.F.
MAXIMUM BUILDING:
30%
ACTUAL BUILDING:
17.000 SF • 48,115 SF X 100 - 35.3%
�
p :�
tlnalq - - I� a n n a
� �� tr n n ®'■1 o ee et
uhd
H■■��I
1
■ • ■
0 « ee � ez
��1M! n �e ;�� Q a
106�e■■1:11 ■ !&[mil et
I Mf s t e� 1 ■ _
"ASk
■ICI 11 � -- n = m .0-1
��I= te_��•
• ��e�a�■ a ec _ Itffill i- Ieil am I
=
ue>�Rl
::: :�=
PROPOSED MULTI - FAMILY HOUSING AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
EAST ELEVATION 0 4420
DATE: 2/16/94
Q n, BERNA D HEF NC N
aEIlk
I
;R
LOCATION MAP
1903
I -909
4912
'
1905
—
4907
1
49161
4915
�- —r
4917
I
3948 3914 139101
X916 -20
3936
_ 1 3922• -30 �39fB I
4909
4920 I
1 4921
49 1/2 ST r
4911
—
4924 1
4925 1
5935
I X621 I
4915
4917
^ 4928
_
1912
T�
i
I I = 4945
4919
4936
14220 14200 1
4120 4100 na 1
�`
o
13922
—
13914 139061
—
50TH ST V
_ 5001 421S I 4211 1420! L_ 41 21 T 1 . 4101 ` 1 3945lr.1I I V„ �! _ ,� 3 9f1 1390-1-09 , I 1
5003
Wi - I IILI11 �� 11
Soar P � 1 Is000-le I �
t _y 5016 i 5017 -
5D
5007 3943
j"; 5024 1 5021
5011 1 - 5025 5021 I 5926 1 I ,, 1
\ ` —i
5013
50A 5032 150211 I 5029 5028 1 5022 -M
5015_ 5050 1
5017
^ 5040 ST 5033 5032 I 4075
S
`�- -' 5101 51001
5019 5044
I
51ST ST 1 5105 I 5104 1 r —
—17 510! Sf00 I 5!O! I 5100 �-
1 5109 5108 510! 5100 SfOf
5103 —~ �— 1 5105 5101 5105
5104 I 1 5113 5112 5105 5104 11. I 5100
5105 — F-- SL �Og SfOB� 1 5109
5107 5108 1 1 5117 5116 1 5109 5100 I 5!!5 —y
5112 I 5113
5109 1 5112 I 5l
51 `
_ � 5121 1 20 � —1 o SI 113 — 5114 I 5117 5f 16 1 5117 —y 12�
r— 1
5116 1 5125 1 5124 1 : 5117 5!!6 I • 5121 I 5 5121 ^� 5f 16 I
REZONING.
NUMBER Z -94 -1
L O C A T 10 N South of West 50th Street and west of Halifax Avenue
REQUEST PCD -4 , Planned Commercial District, R-1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to PRD -4, Planned Residence
District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,4
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
Z -94 -1 PCD -4, Planned Commercial District
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -4, Planned Residence District
General Location: South of West 50th Street and west of Halifax
Avenue
Property Address: 4101 West 50th Street, 5014 & 5016 Halifax Ave
The City has received a rezoning proposal which anticipates
the redevelopment of the subject properties with a four story, 24
unit apartment building. The building would also contain a 39
space parking garage. The redevelopment includes the Fina Service
Station and the two single dwelling properties immediately south of
the station. The redevelopment site has an area of approximately
38,700 square feet. The proposal also includes a 12 foot wide
public alley which extends from the westerly edge of the properties
to Halifax Avenue. The proposal seeks vacation of this alley for
inclusion in the redeveloped properties.
The proposed rezoning is to PRD -4, Planned Residence District.
This district is suitable for high density market rate apartments
or condominiums. Following is an analysis of the proposal relative
to recruirements of the PRD -4 district.
Density
Gross lot area required
2,900 S.F. per unit
Credits:
Under building parking
500 S.F. per space
up to 1.5 spaces
Type I or II Construction
500 S.F. per unit
Required Lot Area
Lot Area Provided
1
69,600 S.F.
- 18,000 S.F.
- 12,000 S.F.
39,600
38,665 S. F.
Lot Area Variance
Building Coverage
935 S. F.
Maximum coverage allowed = 30%
Proposed building coverage = 33.8%
Lot coverage variance = 3.8%
Setback: 35 feet or building height, if greater, from all
property lines
Building varies in height from 44 feet at the north end to 48
feet at the south end
Setbacks vary from 14 feet (northeast corner) to 50 feet
(along west side)
Variances Required:
North
None
East
30 Feet
South
8 Feet
West
None
Height: No height limit in PRD -4 District although taller
buildings require larger setbacks
Parking
Required:,
Covered Parking 1.25 space per unit
Exterior Parking .75 space per unit
Total 2 spaces per unit
Proposed:
Covered 39 spaces or 1.63 per unit
Exterior 12 spaces or .5 per unit
Total 51 spaces /2.13 per unit
No parking variances required
Parking setbacks: The proposed plan provides the required 10 foot
setbacks.
Building Exterior Materials:
2
A
Preliminary design calls for an exterior of stucco and brick
which would comply with ordinance requirements.
Proximity to R -1 District:
When buildings in the PRD -4 district are four stories or more
and are adjacent to R -1 lots, building setbacks are increased
according to the following formula:
Distance to R -1 Property Line =
10 (height - 40) + 80
or
10 (48 -40) + 80 = 160 feet
variance required is 110 to 120 feet along west and south
property lines. This setback does not apply to buildings less than
four stories in height.
50th and France Redevelopment Plan:
The three subject properties are included within the 50th and
France Redevelopment Plan Area. Also included in the plan area is
the single dwelling lot immediately south of the subject property
(not included in the redevelopment proposal). The Plan designates
the three single dwelling lots as suitable for a multi- housing
redevelopment in the range of 14 to 16 units. The Plan did not
anticipate redevelopment of the station and, thus is illustrated
for Commercial use. The requested amendment of the Plan
"Residential" would be consistent with adjacent properties to the
immediate south.
Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject properties
is the same as in the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. An
amendment to the Plan would be required to change the station site
designation from "Commercial" to "High Density Residential ".
Recommendation:
The Comprehensive Plan and the 50th and France Redevelopment
Plan both encourage redevelopment of this section of Halifax for
multi - family residential use. Also, replacing a commercial use
with residential (station site) would be consistent with city
policies and actions in 50th and France and other commercial
districts. Thus I believe the proposed land use is consistent with
city plans and policies.
Although I believe the use is appropriate, I do have concerns
about the size and intensity of the proposed building. First the
density is at or above what would be allowed by the Zoning
Ordinance or 50th and France Plan. The Plan suggests approximately
2,000 square feet of land area per unit. At that rate the site
would support 19 to 20 units, not 24 as proposed. A zoning
ordinance review finds the site 935 square feet short in lot area
for the number of units proposed. Thus, the proposed building is
close to ordinance compliance. However, the density, should be
balanced against variances required for setback and lot coverage.
In summary, I believe the proposed use is appropriate, but the
proposed building is too dense and large for the site provided. I
would suggest a reduction in the unit count or the addition of more
property to support the development.
Issues and conditions which should be addressed in the
Planning Commission recommendation.
1. Preliminary rezoning including requested variances for
building coverage and building setbacks caused by the height
of the building.
2. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan
3. Amendment of the 50th and France Plan
4. Vacation of Alley right of way
5. Site plan changes to address concerns of
attached memo) and to be incorporated
agreement.
6. Watershed District.grading permit.
7. Final Rezoning.
4
City Engineer (see
into a developers
L-
N
7, 3 � IN 11
MI c UCE I
RE,-\ILM --
�WfFl -IVE
Q.t
9.600 S.F 0
-:;OV::= _-.-SCAPE S;-°FEI- M
7zCv--E LANDSCAPE BUFFEFl-
AV .niOUGH LA'kS"j
jq
m m
77EET
ING 2 Is Is
2EVISE !',-E7;z-ECT',C7l
AREA
,-_-jE-wgky FLOW
-cOIVI BANK
-L ='-QWING—,
71M
-,2
tIDENTIAL
S.F.
IR
man
-I PP.'
RETAIL
65-000 S.F.MP2-*
r
.,00.
RETAIL '4E
44ETAIL 5,000 S.F.
.00
16 UNITS
CREASE
tz a PLA ZA:
Z
44 rZ4AJOR FOCUS
I
,leRSECTION RADII-11
lv;.Q LEF7 -"-,NS
P,
N
7, 3 � IN 11
MI c UCE I
RE,-\ILM --
�WfFl -IVE
Q.t
9.600 S.F 0
-:;OV::= _-.-SCAPE S;-°FEI- M
AV .niOUGH LA'kS"j
jq
m m
ING 2 Is Is
>
71M
-,2
tIDENTIAL
S.F.
<
-
-I PP.'
1: SF
1,FF S
1
.00
16 UNITS
DO 2 -EvELS
'O EAIQTING
PARKING
-PnON:CLO:;E HAI-IFAA
I
'.0 ON ST,-EET PARKING----d
, T FLOOR
=TAIL 15-00OS.F
iD FLOOR
� *..iO/OFF.
-;EAUGN STREET 3
7APER TO IMPROVE SITE LINE
-j -ESIDENTIAL
S.F.
--15 UNITS-0.
s.
PROVDIE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
� 0 M '—I OSED Al.—q
13 mm nP
� I ANOSCAPF
IPIIFe
7-Oth cz romANCZ
'OMMERCIAL AREA !LAN
•0 ON ST,-,EET an
CITY OF EDINA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 26, 1994
TO: Craig Larsen, City Planner /
J �,
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer , i
SUBJECT: Multi - Family Housing - 50th & Halifax
The following observations are given on this proposal.
A. Obviously, the alley must be vacated as a public use. If the vacation is done,
we believe the curb line should be altered between the 50th and Halifax
intersection and Lunds driveway, and appropriate right -of -way for sidewalk and
street be granted.
B. The proposed drop -off is directly across from the main Lunds driveway. That
street location is always very busy and adding a drop -off is not appropriate.
We would suggest that American Disabilities Act and Handicapped Code
requirements be dealt with on the west side of the building in the parking lot.
C. We believe some concern should be expressed for the integration of this
project with the general 50th & France Streetscape System. This is particularly
true as you approach the area from the west.
D. Although, not a required submittal at this point, we believe the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District may require drainage and erosion control practices
that will impact the development. Also, the developer must use MPCA's Best
Management Practices as a guide.
PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
EDINA MINNESOTA
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -
I.
I r- --- --- - -7
r ---------- --------- i
1 T r P L n W
^mcmaEcTs mcommmm
No 1 1 V A 1 -1 2
11 X11 Fill Ill!
1P f it 11� fl 111 11 III 111 IIII II! 1�1 II I 11 11 11 1 � �`� � 11 11
N 0 1 _L Y ^ -J 1 -A W T-i-O N
MINIITES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1994
7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, D. Runyan, L. Bergman, A. Swenson, N.
Faust, H. McClelland, G. Workinger, D. Byron
MEMBERS ABSENT: G. Johnson, R. Hale, C. Ingwalson, L. Johnson
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINIITES:
Commissioner Faust moved approval of the January 5, 1994,
meeting minutes. Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
Z -94 -1 PCD -4, Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to PRD -4, Planned Residence
District for Haymaker Construction Co.
4101 West 50th Street, 5014 &,5016 Halifax Avenue
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City has received a
rezoning proposal which anticipates the redevelopment of the
subject properties with a four story, 24 unit apartment building.
The building would also contain a 39 space parking garage. The
redevelopment includes the Fina Service Station and the two single
dwelling properties immediately south of the station. The
redevelopment site has an area of approximately 38,700 square feet.
The proposal also includes a 12 foot wide public alley which
extends from the westerly edge of the properties to Halifax Avenue.
The proposal seeks vacation of this alley for inclusion in the
redeveloped properties.
Mr. Larsen explained the proposed rezoning is to PRD -4,
Planned Residence District. This district is suitable for high
density market rate apartments or condominiums.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the Comprehensive Plan and the 50th and
France Redevelopment Plan both encourage redevelopment of this
section of Halifax for multi - family residential use. Also,
replacing a commercial use with residential (station site) would be
consistent with city policies and actions in 50th and France and
other commercial districts. Thus he believed the proposed land use
was consistent with city plans and policies.
1
Mr. Larsen indicated that although he believed the use is
appropriate, he had concerns about the size and intensity of the
proposed building. First the density is at or above what would be
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance or 50th and France Plan. The Plan
suggests approximately 2,000 square feet of land area per unit. At
that rate the site would support 19 to 20 units, not 24 as
proposed. A zoning ordinance review finds the site 935 square feet
short in lot area for the number of units proposed. Thus, the
proposed building is close to ordinance compliance. However, the
density should be balanced against variances required for setback
and lot coverage.
Mr. Larsen concluded in summary, he believed the proposed use
was appropriate, but the proposed building was too dense and large
for the site provided. Mr. Larsen suggested a reduction in the
unit count or the addition of more property to support the
development.
Issues and conditions which should be addressed in the
Planning Commission recommendation.
1. Preliminary rezoning including requested. variances for
building coverage and building setbacks caused by the height
of the building.
2. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan
3. Amendment of the 50th and France Plan
4. Vacation of Alley right of way
5. Site plan changes to address concerns of City Engineer (see
attached memo) and to be incorporated into a developers
agreement.
6. Watershed District grading permit.
7. Final Rezoning.
The proponent, Mr. Mark Haymaker of Haymaker Construction Inc
was present and Mr. John Nissen, architect was present to respond
to questions.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if the Watershed
District had reviewed the proposal, and if there was any
possibility that the proposed building may be elevated due to
drainage. Mr. Larsen told Commissioner McClelland he does not know
if the building will have to be elevated to accommodate drainage.
He added he has encouraged the developer to meet with the Watershed
District to discuss the proposal.
Chairman Runyan noted the proposed building would have
underground parking, and questioned if the garage will be
mechanically ventilated. Mr. Larsen said mechanical ventilation
would be required in the building.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen the height of the Regency
Condominiums on France. Mr. Larsen responded the Regency is a
2
three story building with underground parking.
Commissioner Byron questioned if the Commission is being asked
to only amend the Comprehensive Plan and 50th and France Avenue
Plan for the PCD portion of this proposal, since the balance of the
land is consistent with those plans. Mr. Larsen responded that is
correct. The Comprehensive Plan and the 50th and France Avenue
Plan have this area designated for multi - residential along with the
PCD zoning of the service station. Mr. Larsen said if the proposal
before the Commission this evening is approved the plan needs to be
amended for the service station portion of the site.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen the height of the
Lanterns condominiums. Mr. Larsen said the Lanterns is a four
story building with underground parking, probably around 40 feet in
height.
Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Larsen if the engineering
department expressed concern with regard to traffic flow and safety
as a result of the additional residential units in the area. Mr.
Larsen said on a preliminary basis it has been determined that
traffic should not be a problem as a result of this proposal. Mr.
Larsen pointed out at present this site encompasses two residential
dwellings, and one commercial, and it has been concluded that
service stations are a more intense use than residential. The
removal of the service station should reduce traffic flow.
Commissioner Workinger said he is. not clear on the variances
required for this proposal. Mr. Larsen said the building is over
on lot coverage, and also. requires larger setbacks due to the
height of the proposal building. Expanding on this Mr. Larsen
explained setback for buildings that exceed three stories in height
are increased.
Mr. John Nissen introduced himself, and explained to members
of the Commission when studying this site the feeling was this site
has a strong transitional character, and would provide a buffer
between commercial, and residential properties. Mr. Nissen
expanded his comments to include the site will be adequately
landscaped, noting additional landscaping will also be incorporated
along the visitor parking area to screen the visitor lot from
residential properties. Continuing, Mr. Nissen said he believed
the design of the building lends itself well to the residential
character of the neighborhood. The facade has been broken up to
lessen the mass by incorporating bay windows and balconies where
appropriate. Mr. Nissen explained the units will be luxury in
style, and approximately 1600 + square feet containing fireplaces,
two bathrooms, and skylights for top floor residents.
Mr. Haymaker, told the Commission he believes the proposal
will be an enhancement to the area, and is in keeping with the
Comprehensive Plan and the 50th and France Avenue Plan., He pointed
3
out the Regency and Lantern condominiums, noting the Regency is a
three story 18 .unit brick building, and the Lanterns is a four
story 36 unit brick building. Mr. Haymaker also pointed out that
a smaller two story apartment building is located to the west of
the site.. Mr. Haymaker stated he believes the close proximity to
shopping, and other commercial amenities will be a benefit to the
residents of this project. He said he feels "empty nesters"
currently residing in Edina will be attracted to this type of
housing which will free up single family homes for purchase.
Concluding Mr. Haymaker stated in his opinion this project will
benefit the City of Edina.
Ms. Margaret Ryan, resident of the Lanterns asked the
proponent how many quest parking spaces will be supplied. Mr.
Haymaker said the quest parking lot will contain 12 parking slots.
Ms. Sharon Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue, told Commission
members in her opinion traffic is already stressed along this
stretch of road. She pointed out getting out of the area onto West
51st and West 50th Streets is difficult due to the speed of
traffic, and the curve. Adding an additional 24 units in the area
with the potential of at least 10 trips to and from creates more
traffic, and safety problems. Ms. Maetzold said the residents of
the neighborhood presently use the gas station, and if the gas
station leaves it will be missed. Ms. Maetzold stated she also is
concerned with the height of the proposed building, four stories is
too tall for the neighborhood, especially on the corner.
Continuing, Ms. Maetzold said another aspect to consider will be
the additional foot traffic resulting from this proposal. Many
persons may want to cross the street to Lunds to pick up some
groceries, and if they choose to dart across the street, instead of
crossing at the light, an accident will occur. Ms. Maetzold said
she believes the neighborhood is not totally adverse to change, but
added a four story building on this corner, the "entrance" into
downtown Edina seems to drastic. A smaller less massive building
would be preferable for the area and Edina.
Mr. Haymaker added he can understand the concerns of
neighbors, and clarified that while they have referred to the
proposed units as apartments, they are condominiums. The residents
of this building will own their units, and more than likely are
current Edina residents. Some may even be familiar with the
neighborhood and traffic patterns.
Ms. Connie Brockway told Commission members she represents her
mother -in -law Mrs. Brockway, property owner to the immediate south
(5024 Halifax Avenue) of the proposal, and stated she believes the
proposed plan isolates this house, will create traffic problems,
and is too tall. She explained her mother -in -laws house has been
on the market for a number of months, and at present no firm offers
have materialized due to the proposal. Ms. Brockway also informed
the Commission all offers to purchase the home have been for below
4
the assessed market value. She added she feels her mother -in -laws
home should not subsidize the proposed four story condominium
development. Concluding Ms. Brockway pointed out the site may have
some groundwater contamination, and questioned if the proponent has
considered this possibility.
Mr. Haymaker responded the PCA will look into the possibility
of contamination, and a decision will be made on how the clean -up
will be handled.
Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Haymaker the price of the
proposed units. Mr. Haymaker stated the units will be around
$165,000.00 plus. Commissioner Faust questioned Mr. Haymaker if he
considered purchasing the Brockway house south of this proposal.
Mr. Haymaker said at one time he considered purchasing this house,
but the price was too high.
Ms. Maetzold pointed out if Mr. Haymaker acquires the Brockway
home, the house next door will become a "Brockway" home. The
current problem the Brockways have will pass to the next property
owner, and continue down the line if more homes are allowed to be
taken. Continuing, Ms. Maetzold said in her opinion the proposal
is too large, too tall, problems will occur with parking, and
safety of pedestrians is a concern.
Mr. Haymaker pointed out the Lanterns off West 51st and
Halifax is four stories, and contains more units.
Ms. Maetzold stated, regardless of the Lanterns, in her
opinion the proposed building is too tall, too large, and is the
entrance into downtown Edina. Ms. Maetzold suggested constructing
a small townhouse development, or a smaller condominium building of
no more than three stories.
Mr. Haymaker explained the price of the land is high, and a
small number of townhomes would not support the purchase price.
Commissioner Faust questioned Mr. Larsen if variances would be
required if the building were reduced to three stories. Mr. Larsen
said the only variance that would be required if the building were
reduced would be for lot coverage.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if the building remains at
four stories how large are the variances. Mr. Larsen said a 50
foot setback variance is needed on the west, and a 40 foot setback
variance is needed on the south. These setback variances would not
be needed as indicated previously if the building were reduced to
three stories.
Mr. David Brockway, 5024 Halifax, told the Commission he has
a concern regarding drainage problems that may occur as a result of
this proposal.
5
Mr. Larsen explained that part of the City process requires
the Watershed District to review the plans, and issue or deny a
permit. The City also has criteria the development has to meet.
Mr. Larsen said drainage patterns cannot be altered, and your
property should remain unchanged.
Commissioner Workinger stated he believes the concept of the
proposal makes sense, and was contemplated by the city as indicated
in the Comprehensive Plan and the. 50th and France Avenue Plan.
Continuing, Commissioner Workinger said he has a concern regarding
the height of the building. Commissioner Workinger indicated in
his opinion the proposed building is too tall, and will not blend
in well with the character of the neighborhood. Commissioner
Workinger added that while he believes change is not necessarily
bad, the integrity of Edina's residential neighborhoods must be
preserved. Commissioner Workinger remarked another concern of his
is vehicular traffic safety, and pedestrian safety. Concluding
Commissioner Workinger pointed out as a result of this proposal
traffic patterns will change. Commissioner Workinger said that
while he supports the concept he has a problem supporting a
proposal that requires so many variances.
Commissioner Faust informed Commission members she wants to
prevent another Vernon Terrace from being constructed in the City
and believes the proposal before them will have the same impact on
this neighborhood as Vernon Terrace did. Commissioner Faust
pointed out the proposed building needs to be "dressed up ", and
softened. It is too plain, and too big. Commissioner Faust
declared aesthetics are very important on such a high profile
corner. Commissioner Faust concluded she cannot support any
variances, and in her opinion a hardship does not exist.
Commissioner McClelland said she agrees with Commissioner
Faust's observation that the proposed building is too plain, adding
in her opinion it creates a blocky bulky appearance. Commissioner
McClelland pointed out this is a lovely quaint residential
neighborhood with older homes, and at present it is surrounded by
too many large buildings. The character and symmetry must be
maintained. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland stated all setback
variances that are required are extreme, lot coverage is a big
problem. Commissioner McClelland pointed out in the past the
Commission has been very careful on approving anything that
requires a lot coverage variance. Commissioner McClelland also
noted a 24 unit building will produce a large volume of traffic.
She pointed out the site lines are difficult at best, and the
proposal should be carefully reviewed from a traffic standpoint.
Commissioner McClelland remarked the proposed vacation of the alley
gives the developer more space, but cuts off the neighbors.
Commissioner McClelland concluded in her opinion, the building
doesn't fit, and the developer is asking for too much.
Commissioner Bergman asked the proponent his reasoning behind
2
the size of the proposed building, and questioned if the proponent
would be willing to reduce the building size.
Mr. Haymaker responded the number of units reflect the high
price of the land.
Commissioner Faust reiterated in her opinion the proposed
building resembles Vernon Terrace, which is not a building most of
Edina finds aesthetically pleasing. Commissioner Faust stated she
hopes when the final plans are sketched the building will have more
character, and not.be as offensive.
Chairman Runyan pointed out usually the sketches presented at
this point in the process are preliminary. Chairman Runyan told
the proponent he hopes there will be additions to the building to
make it more aesthetically pleasing since it will is located in a
very visible location.
Commissioner Byron said he has a number of concerns regarding
this proposal, but cautioned we should not "throw away" something
that may be positive because at present it contains some negative
features. Commissioner Byron stated he believes this location is
transitional, pointing out plans have designated a portion of this
site as multi - residential. Continuing, Commissioner Byron said he
feels it is very important to protect Edina's single dwelling
neighborhoods, but this location needs to be addressed, and is
transitional. Commissioner Byron said he has a number of concerns,
one is vacating the alley, and he questioned if the alley is
important. Commissioner Byron commented he feels sympathy for the
property owners of the house directly south, but pointed out there
will always be a "house next door ". Commissioner Byron said the
proposed upscale residential condominiums provide a good
transitional land use, noting in our position as commissioners we
are consistently dealing with "too much ", but in this situation
what we must determine is if this is too much, how can we arrive at
something workable for this site. Commissioner Byron remarked he
feels the .setback variances requested for this proposal are too
high which indicates the project should be scaled back to eliminate
those variances. Commissioner Byron commented something should
also be worked out to either eliminate the lot coverage variance or
reduce it. Commissioner Byron concluded another concern is the
drop -off location in front of the building. The city engineer
expressed a concern regarding this location. This proposal is a
good start, but redesign is needed.
Commissioner McClelland acknowledged the city's Comprehensive
Plan and the 50th and France Avenue Plan, but said in her opinion
the site does not have to be developed as the plans indicate. She
pointed out it is not necessary to redevelop every site.
Commissioner Byron agreed with Commissioner McClellands point
about redevelopment, but expressed he would have a concern if the
7
gas station ceases to operate, and the site remains empty.
Commissioner Byron pointed out Fina has already indicated this site
does not suit their current method of operation.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if the lot coverage
variance results from the buildings footprint. Mr. Larsen said
that is correct, lot coverage is for the footprint. If the height
is reduced the setbacks change, but if the footprint remains the
same a variance for lot coverage is still required.
Commissioner Faust commented that the proponent may have to
reduce the size of the proposed units, thereby reducing the
buildings footprint.
Commissioner Bergman questioned Mr. Larsen on who is the
property owner of record for the two residential houses, and
secondly does Fina really want to discontinue service at this
location as indicated. -
Mr. Larsen said the residential houses are owned by Fina, and
Fina has expressed desire to vacate the site and cease operation.
Chairman Runyan said in his opinion the proposed use of the
site is reasonable, and while the site does not have to be
redeveloped we must consider this proposal because someone has
requested redevelopment. Continuing, Chairman Runyan said he also
believes the building is too high, and suggested that the proponent
consider a three story building.
Commissioner McClelland asked Chairman Runyan if a "straw"
vote could be taken concerning the commissioners height preference.
On an informal vote commission members recommended that
the proposed building be reduced to three stories.
Chairman Runyan indicated to the proponent that the discussion
this evening indicates redesign is recommended and asked Mr.
Haymaker if he is willing to continue his request to the next
meeting to respond to concerns expressed by the commission this
evening.
Mr. Haymaker said he is willing to continue his request to the
next commission meeting.
Commissioner McClelland moved to continue the request until
the March 2, 1993, meeting. Commissioner Bergman seconded the
motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
8
r
NOTE REGARDING THE PETITIONS:
The petitions, for many sections of the streets, are
incomplete because of:
(1) Two people have not turned in their petitions yet. You will
get them Monday before the meeting.
(2) MANY people were not home, even after to attempts.
(3) Most residents (Indianola, Maple, Gorgas) didn't know
ANYTHING about the project, and the Sun Current article had not
come out yet.
(4) The illness of the person doing Indianola.
You will get the additional petitons. Monday before the
meeting.
Thank you.....
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
AME
mist t-'s
ADDRESS
_54-4-5 C�kL
..r
_370SIt Lc{C - - - --
-- ------------ -rt' -- ----- - - - - --
`----------- - - - - --
�� ---- - - -S-1 ? -- ---- - - - - --
5 1 z9 1-{u LA - - - --
--- - -5 //Y ---- - - - - --
57 -¢
0
fw
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION
CONCERNING
THE
PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
COMPLEX AT
50TH
AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on -the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
9
_____________________ _____________ ____ _______ _ ______
NAME ADDRESS
--- - - - - --
Z
__________��o� _1- _I�1�►�____
-- ..... 1.E -� - - -- -
- -- - -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- -
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having al multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
6
---------------------------------------------------- -
NAME ADDRESS
= — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - -
I?
----- - - - - -- - ►_'�i_'_P �? ----- - - - - --
------ 4li - ----- - - - - --
/A07aZ -- - - - - --
1�11_5111'1'_Yl 1471 C71 7
lie
w
I;
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG, CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
NAME ADDRESS
------------
----------
---------- ------------
----------------------- -----------------
ot
---------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
NAME ADDRESS
I. _
ORIGINAL
1 0 t]
QUALITY
DOCUMENT
" _*":�7 8 1
0(a40V1..4 41
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROP St
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
NAME ADDRESS
�6 memo"
��.\ — ------------------------------
yl
--------------
�� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7
-----------------------
_,L_j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---=- ---- -- -------7----------------------
------------------
---------------------
----------------- - - - - -- - '----- - - - - --
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
28 UNIT, 256 FT. LONG CONDO COMPLEX AT 50TH AND HALIFAX
We, the undersigned, are in acceptance of having a multi-
family complex on this site. However, we OBJECT to the overall
length of the building at 256 feet long, as well as, the impact it
would have on the already overloaded traffic patterns in our
neighborhood.
We would like the building decreased in length by
approximately 50 feet.
---- ------------------------------------- - - - - -- J
.NAME ADDRESS '
--, r - -- i ✓ ---------- - - - - -- ----- -2-� -� ----- - - - - --
- - -- r7
-
- - ----------------------------------------- - - - - --
jq ism
-���.. i- ��'��► Ott' 1�.+� '�x.11,o+►.� tA
All
&AA. ?A# a J�h
t �
cou
JAMES H. ILLIES, CPM"
STEPHEN F. NOHAVA. CPM'v
LEON HEINEN, CPM®
MICHAEL STOEBE, CPMv
ILLIES NOHAVA HEINEN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
18 North Ninth Avenue St. Cloud Minn. 56303
Phone (612) 252 -2000
Fax(612)252 -2752
March 17, 1994
Mr. Craig Larsen
Director of Planning
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Re: Proposed Multi Family Housing
50th & Halifax
Dear Mr. Larsen:
Thank you for visiting with me concerning the above
referenced development. We manage the 9 plex at 4121 West
50th Street and have the following concerns with the
proposal as presented.
By closing (vacating) the alleyway you would significantly
restrict the ability of our residents to ingress and egress
the property. °
The traffic count on West 50th is significant which makes it
virtually impossible to go West on 50th off of Indianola.
(Our only access if the alleyway is vacated.) Indianola is
the next street West of Halifax. If the City, in its
attempts to deal with the congestion, (in the future) should
widen 50th and /or install a median back to Indianola our
ingress and egress would be further hampered.
If our residents go South on Indianola the neighborhood may
object to an increase in traffic.
Our most commonly travelled pattern is for our residents to
travel East through the alley to Halifax, turn North, and
utilize the traffic lights to go East and West, or, go South
on Halifax to France Avenue.
In the event of a natural disaster, medical emergency, or
fire, access to the most restricted areas would be difficult
to reach.
Mr. Craig Larsen
March 17, 1994
Page 2
With what priority will the City maintain the remaining
alleyway with regard to snow removal and repairs?
Granting us an easement through the parking lot of the
proposed development would allow our residents proper egress
as well as allow emergency vehicles, snowplows and repair
vehicles the ability to carry out their jobs.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
INH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Stephen F. Nohava, CPM@
CERTIFIED PROPERTY MANAGER®
SFN:cmp
8
Dear Neighbors,
It was suggested by City Hall that it would be most effective if we
each write a letter to: The City Council voicing our concerns about the
proposed 28 unit, 256 foot long condominium complex at 50th and Halifax.
It doesn't need to be very long. The number of PEOPLE RESPONDING
is important, not the number of sentences in our letter. The .comments in
the neighborhood seem to be cent=d on these key-issues:
(1) It's tog_ hng at 236 feet. Can't-ir be shortened by 50 ft?
The traffic patterns in the area are already overloaded.
We need to keep the existing trees and guarantee that the new
landscaping will enhance the neighborhood.
Your letters need to reach "Jackie" in the the City Planner's
Office by late Thursday afternoon, March 17. (If mailing? Edina
City Hall; c/o Jackie, City Planner's Office; 4801 W. 50th St.; Edina, MN
55424): She will include these letters in the information packets sent to
each City Council member in preparation for the City Council meeting on
Monday, March 21 at 7:00. (Hope to see you at the meeting, also!)
P.S. Write the letter to the CITY COUNCIL, not the City Planner.
Thank you for your support. We're counting on you!
!G c1 �ha Ot fl IUV,IG.
j h qVG I i ved o� l�ul; i'utc l�v�nue
-"-e 3o `1 ea►,s.
1 h a oc s «n -i loss S� nq lr -Fa m e
homes -4 ho-1- hull roarlt o� -Ih is vne
de5it -a6lc
4 fhe �. v rl d s. --?a r kj i nI Jot 4 he_ �
•3'1 S.T.5-�Iee4 % y Pu ss ecwd ihe, 44" feYds
Col,�latT�n�0Is%I 14ad 4,1zese eyts+ed
,&,� LleI vs cwo 1 w� cj , d n�ocY
P"t",AaSe4 -Ji¢. bovS e "4 b o 3 e
ljat".�Ux . (ti 14 4"�s nom; cievC Iu(�rrMr>f I
�nC Inc.4 -A, %►, sldee mC)u ad aw
c>` r ,��, rh,•� . J S -f Ly gill
4a-c (-� I �- (��
s �
t'
cy
AA C_ c4,
VO
Ell
, �QC4
Zj�r
St
6`7 &YC C- Y7 C,/
At
co
J _
J J ��
CIL
be�
C Cry
Ck-
"C-L
(-Cp tr-Cwelk-
_k_4
-401
eut—j
21
zeZ
1
XabL-gins vV. !gfrawm
4073 CW&.sf ClifirfiUL Jh9cf.
'Edina. :Alantscia 35424
wt
ri
till
a
s
i 3,✓q-,5;y
DR. CHARLES JOSEPH BALOGH
5204 BA -,TFAS AVNNDN SOUWH. MINNEAPOZLTS. MINNFAOTA 66424
March 15, 1994
Dean City Council Members,
My husband and I purchased our home thinking of the future,
that we would be near stores and a bank as we grew older.
We enjoy this residential area, and plan to continue living
in these pleasant surroundings as senior citizens*
After several years of City Meetings, we were given the
present diagonal street at Fiftieth and France to direct
business traffic away from the residential streets. Now a
condominium will not only bring the tenants traffic, but
all their services and deliveries.
Finoethis is a residential area, consideration of the
building's size to the available space, and its appearance
is essential. Trees, shrubs, and lawns are automatically
included in the architectural..-plans, necessitating ample
space to resemble the residences of the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Charles J. Balogh
Mary R. Balogh
�yo
jai
7-o',
Edina City Hall
c/o Jackie
City Planner's Office
4801 West 50th st.
Edina, MN 55424
Ben and Mary Porter
5120 Halifax Ave. S.
Edina, MN 55424
922 -4138
March 14, 1994
Dear City Council:
We have concerns about the proposed 28 unit, 256 foot condominium
complex at 50th and Halifax.
1) A 256 -foot building seems much too long. Why must such a
large building be placed on these lots? A better "transitional"
structure would be only two stories and allow for improving the
landscaping.
2) This building should have a brick exterior to blend with the
other business structures in 50th and France area. Brick implies
quality workmanship, stucco implies cost savings. If this complex
is to be built, it should be a positive icon to OUR neighborhood.
3) The traffic patterns and traffic congestion in this area
will continue to be dangerous for cars and pedestrians. We need
to hear from the city council that a comprehensive approach to
these problems is needed.
S'nc ly,
Bennett Porter
Mary P4ter
1
K r iS- ho,
��z� S�dla-►�c��a + \�
Z iJ n -I- C a m i ►� v u l d i a-�-
�� o ��� I d.► S� n � c Y,�-1
our- 1 A o rvw \AIDLA d
yy-) r-0 n Cet ✓Z
�l X17 l i l f7 Vl �--rr�✓v� Ve- h 1 CAD n-kr
how se.ho L oc�- a"�,.�a wilt o
N e� off' � a-�- i ►-, a -�� � a1►�t a+ �a-�-� a+� �
4-C a ►' c-, -+u r n I Y--) r I c h+ -C) V-) 21 y,—
�X P/1 i P-jlx 5 1 n
ry-)
- a d +-
C �., s,e, D v�e cQ —
I�o�d vv-&
-� c) ry-\� Z s a
Y1 O 1nJ �r✓1 -� I-, �- At � � �✓
C
�,di►na dc)
i / . L.
5100 Halifax Avenue South
Edina, MN 55424
March 14, 1994
Edina City Counsel
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th - Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Proposed Condominium Project at 50th and Halifax
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
As owner of the above listed property, I am writing to
express some concerns with the proposed condominium complex at
50th and Halifax. Specifically, the proposed building is too
long, it will produce excess traffic on an already overburdened
system of streets, and runs the risk of damaging the character of
the neighborhood.
Initially, the proposed condominium complex, at 256
feet,,is too long. This length is simply untenable. It is
completely out of character with the structures in the
neighborhood, which include single family houses and small
commercial units. The condominium complex will extend too far
down on the 50- hundred block of Halifax Avenue. As a result, the
proposed green space between it and the houses is insufficient to
properly blend the complex in with the rest of the neighborhood.
It is respectfully submitted that Mr. Haymaker, the project's
developer, can make sufficient profit without adding the four
extra units at the expense of necessary green space.
If the length could be shortened by approximately 50
feet, so as to be of a proper size with respect to the structures
in the neighborhood, there would be sufficient green space
between the condominium complex and the houses on the 50- hundred
block of Halifax. This way, there would be an equitable balance
between the interests of the neighborhood and the developer, as
the condominium complex would properly fit with the character of
the neighborhood.
Second, this condominium complex, at its present
length, is going to add extra traffic and the hazards associated
therewith, to an already overburdened system, specifically, 50th
Street, 51st Street and the 50- hundred portion of Halifax Ave.
The 51st Street and Halifax Avenue segment is already a dangerous
section of street, as vehicles travel on it at high speeds.
There is additional vehicular traffic, as motorists use these
streets as a shortcut to France Avenue, in heading south to
Southdale. In addition to this extra traffic, vehicles entering
this.stretch of streets from the southwest at Halifax Avenue,
along with traffic entering and leaving the condominium complex,
will occupy and congest Halifax at nearly the same point, as a
direct result of the condominium complex being so long.
Motorists from Halifax and the condominium would have
insufficient sight lines to enter Halifax or 51st Street, making
this location "an accident waiting to happen." Again, a shorter
complex would place the entry onto Halifax at a safer point,
closer to 50th Street.
Finally, as proposed, the condominium complex must fit
within the character of the neighborhood. This can only be done
by,mazntaining all of the existing trees as well as the addition
of large amounts of green space through proper landscaping.. At
all costs, the quaintness of the neighborhood must be maintained,
for Edina to remain one of the premiere communities in the Twin
Cities.
In summary, I respectfully request your sensitivity to
our neighborhood, by limiting the length of the proposed
condominium complex. To insure proper construction of this
condominium complex would maintain Edina's commitment to its
residents, of a high quality of life for living and raising
families.
Very truly yours,
Jerome R. Smith, Jr.
C!
t� ;,U4%
-�521
�d.�r Gam. a lztwX6& e� ;r� ��
/vlal� / tc �xa�u�g������ �`�`�
91.
4z d v�aQa�
,� � �t,;� fie°'.
a?z� dkiz
NN
40 bk
ciz
\-NJ
NI'a
'19
ROBERT A LARSEN
5037 INDIANOLA AVENUE
EDINA MN 55424
March 14,1994
City Council
c/o Jackie
City Planner' Office
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina MN 55424
Dear Council Members:
I am writing you about the proposed 28 unit, 256 foot long
condominium at 50th and France.
I am not opposed to the construction of a condominium at the site
under consideration. It would make good use of the gas station and
the two adjoining houses to the gas station. These properties have
deteriorated awaiting other use.
I am opposed, however, to the taking of the Smith home at 5016
Halifax which is a well tended home and is, as I understand it, not
yet zoned for a multiple dwelling. With the use of the Smith house
it is possible to create a condominium 256 feet in length but this
would simply be out of place with the other multiple dwelling on
50th street and with the general character of the neighborhood,
small shops, small homes. I would think that a condominin of 200
feet or less would be much more appropiate.
If I were on the City Council, I would not allow the rezoning of
the property at 5016 Halifax, the Smith home.
Sincere ,
J�- irtn
Robert A.
lql0 P OL j ,
4 2
9�� NCO
UH IVti
Dear Council "- "erbers :
Minneapolis Center
1020 Marquette Ave.
Minneapolis MN 55403
612/338 -1317
'arch 17, 1994
Last week I received a notice of a meeting that evening
on a or000sed development. It was rather short notice. E was
unable to atterd. It was my first knowledge about condominiums
at 50th and Halifax.
Today, a neighbor alerted me that you wanted comments
by close of business today, " ".arch 17th and that your meeting on
the proposal would be :larch 21.
I do wish to voice concern. I moved to 5308 Halifax
last year. I knew the neighborhood was quiet and had a certain
residential ambiance. I,did know that a lot of people in the
neighborhood drive through here to avoid travel an France and on
50th Street. To allow condominium use at the corner of Halifax
and 50th St. seems totally inappropriate. The traffic at that
corner with Lunds parking and the other commercial parking for
movies and businesses is already very heavy. :Many people cut
through on. Halifax to avoid the 50th and France intersection.
Increased vehi� e traffic cutting down this street,
added to increased airplane traffic of late, and congestion.on
50th street at the corner do not suggest that a 28 unit condo
is the way to go. More appropriate use would suggest commercial
building in keeping with the neighborhood needs. Such congestion
will also bring down property values.
respectfully.
A41 Ls.
Ja ueline S. liffithun
J
founded 1971
q a member of the
State University
\ System.
J252uy J &.,A. 5.54,2ls
March 17, 1994
Dear City Council members,
Please do not approve the proposed
condominium plan as presented at the planning
commission meetings and the neighborhood
meeting.
It is too big and it is out of character
for the surrounding residences. We want to
keep our neighborhood quiet and neighborly- -
we resent more brick and concrete, more traffic,
more noise.
A 28 unit building means more than 50 cars
(most residents in homes of the proposed price
range have two cars) coming and going across the
street from an already nightmarish entry and
exit from Lunds.
We want a buffer that looks as if it belongs
to us, not to 1st Bank, Clancy's and Lunds.
1
Q•`�qG
Sincerely,
-7-
Edina City Council Sub: Proposed condominium
#21dg at 50th St. & Halifax
Ave.
March 16, 1994
I have attended two meetings on the above
subject and seenthe preliminary architectural
elevation of the front of the building.
With a proposed length of 256", the building,
in my opinion, appears awkwardly long. Shortening the
project 40' or 50' would greatly improve the appear-
ance and provide a better buffer to the private
residence at 5028 Halifax.
Sincerely,
Robert H. Griffiths
5033 Indianola Ave.
Edina, Mn. 55424
g.��qa
March 16, 1994
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
cto Jackie, City Planning Office
4801 W 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Edina City Council Members:
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed zoning change to allow a three story, 28
unit condominium to be built on 51st and Halifax. I feel that the current zoning should be
maintained. Edina already has four other apartment or condominium buildings and a number of
duplexes in close proximity to the 50th & France intersection.
One of the most attractive things about the downtown area of Edina is it's charm, and almost
small town appeal. That feeling is already being encroached upon by increased levels of traffic.
Adding a condominium there would only exacerbate the problem. Downtown Edina's charm is a
valuable asset to all residents and something that has been lovingly maintained and preserved
for many years. I am depending on you to continue that tradition. Please vote against this
development.
Sincerely,
ma4 4� iZt�ma4--,
Mary Kay Rickman
4917 Maple Road
Edina, MN 55424
Tom Rickman
4917 Maple Road
Edina, MN 55424
Jackie
City Planner's Office
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Jackie,
3-16-94
I am writing this letter to voice my protest over the proposed rezoning and building of a
condominium complex on 50th and Halifax. The traffic in the area is terrible already. I do not
support changing the zoning in any way, but if this developer wins I would want the building to be
as small and unobtrusive as possible. From what I can gather, the proposed building is too long
and too tall.
Sincerely,
Tom Rickman
I� 'I
March 16, 1994
City of Edina, MN
City Council
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Councilmembers:
I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed condominium project at West 50th
Street and Halifax.
The building must be designed to compliment the existing residential community. I hope that
high quality construction materials are chosen and that the grounds will be landscaped to soften
the view of the building and fit in with the established residential quality of the neighborhood.
It is essential that the project not appear massive.
I suggest that the south side of the building be designed and landscaping planned so that there
will neither be a looming three -story wall nor a concrete slab of driveway adjacent to the single
family home immediately to the south of the project.
I prefer an architecturally pleasing, well landscaped, high priced condominium project to the
rundown gas station and shabby two houses to the south. I am not in favor of including the third
house south of the gas station in the project.
Sincerely,
Lynda K. Carlson
5105 Halifax
Edina
4aU i V. ''.all S[reet
To Whom it Mav Concern:
i aln wnune ui regard to the proposed condomiuuln btWdute at 50th ann iiairfdx Ave. i have Sorile
concerns tear l would like to address-
,..:� buddiiie ii)J lorig iu: 1.a. ,' lien : ', I: U:ulc''.; Lui ColnC;,lit Li L'i1[ 1[
iioi ht In Ihla newhbornood. , nnedwie more on the order of tow- rhornes or a butldln2
mth some design that would appear more residential instead of a large nnsnnition
1VOUld ber*.er ht in that location.
the traffic pi: toms down Halifax at this tune are iuready overloaded. 1 feel that this will Just
- crease an a!readv d'anserous situation. 1 have three small children who at nsk of
11�! na hit by a car as have no sidewalks and our street seems to be the shortcut ground
iOdi and Frmnce. llwse Pius ily dovv a our street oblivious to uir, fact that uiis 1s a r sid- -i.dal
area. 1 know that another iaree residenial tacruty will atiect our traffic. So please before
,vervone reports that this vvqll have no impact 1 would like a study done to substantiate what
aff ct this project nU have on our traffic.
3.
We boueht m the old area of Edina because of the trees and charm. 1 would like to see thus
charm and the trees not at %cted by this huge long building. Please keep in mind the look
of downtown Edina and only : alow a bud&ig to go in that «611 keep the churn wid the
trees. Relnetnber how long it takes to for a inature Oak to develop and phase dent lust
allow thein to be removed without anv thought.
Thwik ".0a for your tun;:. "Ve have ondy been were nvo v ears but vie cllose Edina because it had iliz, feel
of a chamune nice netgttborhood. Don't lust go in and bulidoze for the sake of progress. Mink about tine
aesthetic-,and the feel of this neighborhood.
Sunc env.
a �1
Fick :rind Sarah Van %Vili de
�121 Hi:i::ax Ave. South
I
Ct'�l Cpc.�Cl i
E0) K-)N
ED d.4. MYU - SSq Z1/
TZ E . Plate ucd G po,4rne• 4 cc "p ler loc-,�d c j- Lilo 1
Gvesr Sv TH 501 q) SU Ito a A-)d a)Z �l {- �c►I.�u x
45 my Mme is PO
said A4' SlOq t-IGI I Ave sar� 7Z
-h a ue 4he C4C4V A jS _ off- -hie Glxve fe Cini - - -
- - - - -- bovN ad e� ua ly
Gd d ✓,used _ -- b y ci � o � Eci ,.�
_ T?h�u�►� _ Cam, m• ss�c.� -� _. - --
1 -T"ZA FFIG
-fie developer 5 �ovl d be req a �rcd 6 ha,,4c
a WGAo_ shy Frefood by a Pro ss 1
I�rQ tt1G envy i„uce� . the ;,r AC- s h.)dy sh�Id i de+u� l
44le exis h _ levcl 0-� Service c4j Nal►-�x
51 T' 5frea-I- aAjd- 50In4 �5V=+ a5 l6ew4e-d
�1%e exiS�► leve I o -� -'- �V t cr- Shod (d be
C.cvn lO�red w �-i'h i'hz �weca5kd level o-i- se�rv�ce
resu l�,'u 4cm -khe -PCo Pond (J e.Ae-lCf)me.L--+,
9
5
kw 1� 4 -e P�s d develgo m e. 4 decrcase
+h e- l eve t 04-. Ser V i ce, )� e deve l cPer shcvld
be regvivcd 4o m b90,Ir-o 4te- imprc� by
iuee� �c
J e I .;c-t . L t- r(no d I fn prcvcm'Aj-'s Ccvv 'jc+
be -11�e
KJ
-PEVELOr=ME'cu1-S- . H 6-1 H
-T
h �9 her - iharu aou y. -.. bu I d l &u j
a xe Commercial A-rca -PLvu exceP +he.
�►1L° ll%:tr4 iu GA-d
T'c,r�C., S �o ci-vres have k--e'u c0061-110c,�-d
__ I-L) q m a,v A-%-.r -4v4- does_ ►uo4- i m Wirer _
-f'he visu,r l G s4 -hAcs 4he crew
GzAgj -rao 'By TLAkAJiAJ&i co►nmissiaAv
voy'louces RAJ deiusi� ctrud bu►ldiA-� ccvera8c
:5 boL) Id quo- - be 9 rGo �.d v less A e- develop
- Pfcves hGrclship . I1 e- vonaouce5 LAJ ejre 43vau�rd
by s i m P ly becausc
dive I coe,<- requested +hcin
w L q Nab -Gee.. 501,bLe tor-- - -q-
pew-
5 s im, I ca r i ru S me 4-he o-%her -itrec -
c ru a dd, 1 S- v►u �s w ou U be rem 6 Ic
G �olI o+ ZO u& )Js. -r-he-
I's re- gLA*�) ,u9 Z8 u,u+ Is - - - -
i- i u kema) �c,3- bei 6cd Gou r -c b Z, -6-64
rePo��- �o T�IGru�� Canmiss+c�
I o-i burn ma ry, 41\,e o4- +Nf,
f6L,w- -Pro pe ,�C.S 4v M A --gym i ly is corus(slvi'
w r�h -f he- S-0114 aid FaaKXC T�cdev�lcpm �►u�- T14&4
OAjd = would Sop
4-he iedeve l cpmeAj- - t 4 r� me}- 4he Y(qqu)rerw_-#j6
o-- -rr e 'P'R D - `4 'eroj►.u9 ord , &r;ruCE G k-id i'he
cl �werneU�C4&j Plarus _ T7-� do 4jer her .
coo 004- -puss -- _cucr cil 1 -hie ►slues__
duel o -pmc.L4 Ira iSCS a -
_ . _ "P (aruru�,u9 _ Co rn � � ss � av d ► d . 7h e _ d e��l° f�r"e� - -- . -- - - - -. - - - --
Needs }�- e reduced___., N -si e c- c?Ajd -
- - - -- - 4o -- b e. _- Gru _Gcc ep6ble - -add.► how
SIAJc�rly,
i
March 18,1994
Dear Edina City Council,
We are concerned that the proposed condominium at 50th and Halifax may be too large for
the following reasons:
Large trees. This large of a construction project on this site will have a substantial probability
of killing the approximately nine mature trees on the site due to the heavy equipment
compacting the soil and roots and many of the roots being severed by excavation.
The probability could be. reduced somewhat if the developer was willing to have a
qualified arborist alter the plans as needed to help preserve the forty to sixty year old
trees. The developer told us he will plant new trees to replace the mature trees that die in
the construction process, but few if any of us will ever see them grow to the size of the
present trees. A large proportion of newly planted trees die before maturity for a variety
of reasons, two of which are the recently popular use of broad leaf plant killers (Nveed
killers "), and the use of petroleum based fertilizers.
Scale and Aesthetics. The proposed size we feel will most likely appear out of scale with our
neighborhood, be inappropriate in style and design, and not have adequate architectural
detail. We also feel that it could be made to appear to be in scale with appropriate
architecture. Judging from the fact that the neighbors have had to tell the developer how
to improve the appearance of the building, we have no faith that the developer has
selected an architect who can accomplish a pleasing design or sense of scale.
Traffic. We expel that all the residents and visitors to the proposed condominium will use
Halifax Avenue for virtually all of their trips to the south and Crosstown Highway 62. We
,continue to have a high volume of traffic driving down our street, much of it at very
dangerous speeds at all times of day and night. The speeders are not exclusively young ,
either. We continue to avoid walking on our own street if possible to avoid the present
traffic. The additional load of this proposed project will make it worse. We feel the
present Fina station does not draw people to the 50th and France area, it mearly draws
business from those already passing through.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
S' cerely,
John Crist
Anne Bishop
5324 Halifax Ave. So.
Edina MN 55424 929 -4047
A!6iw top
Dear Edina City Council Members, „J
WE WANT TO GIVE YOU THE COMPLETE BACKGROUND (SOAP
OPERA ?) OF WHAT HAS TAKEN PLACE INVOLVING THE PROPOSED
CONDOMINIUM WITH HOPES THAT CHANGES CAN BE MADE TO AVOID
THIS KIND OF "DISPUTE" IN THE FUTURE.
The comments and information is based on personal
experience, input from the involved neighbors, and notes from
the pertinent meetings. I know this is long, but it tells the
story of our -frustration. It is our hope that the City Council
will ' look at making it mandatory that the developer notify the
neighborhood at the ONSET and then hold a meeting with them to
see the proposed plans.
It should be understood that- the neighborhood is NOT
objecting to putting in a multi - family building, but we want it
reduced by 50 feet and have a guarantee of the outside
materials and sufficient landscaping.
Mr. Haymaker's original plan for the site was FIVE STORIES and 36
UNITS. (How could anyone "caring" about the quaintness of our area think a
building that size would blend in with the existing buildings ?) He was
told to reduce the building to four stories before he could present it to the
Planning Commission. Several variances were needed to get the 4 story
building approved. (Aren't variances mainly used for hardship cases?
This, of course, is not!)
After 2 hours of the neighbors asking questions of Mr. Haymaker at
the 1st Planning Commission meeting, they agreed with us that 4 stories
was too high. In my notes from the meeting it was stated by one of the
men on the P.C. that, " Four stories is too much. You should scale it
down to 3 stories and 18 units, which would eliminate the need
for many of the variances." Another P.C. member said he'd "like to
see no variances, less floors and a SMALLER BUILDING." Direct
quotes from another P.C. member was, "I don't want another
neighborhood ruined with a building like Vernon Terrace....
especially having a large brick wall with small windows facing
50th Street."
-Mr. Haymaker's Ist architectural design was a plain rectangular,
stucco flat- topped building with small sliding windows of similar size. A
male P.C. member said, "I'm sure they haven't finished the drawing.
It looks like a box." Yet, that is what he was presenting to the P.C..
Between the Ist and 2nd P.C. meetings, I talked several times with
Mark Haymaker. Each time he asked me, "Well, what DO you think the
neighborhood would like to see? What should I do to the
building ?" The P.C. chairman told Mr. Haymaker that he and his architect
should be creating the appropriate changes and not have to ask a person in
the neighborhood.
The P.C. said that if he
can work out a
plan for a 3 story building,
they will review it. However,
when the P.C. met in March, Mr.
Haymaker
had picked up the option to buy
the 3rd house for $140,000.
Now, the
new proposal was 56 ft.
LONGER and
had 28 UNITS !!!
It was
now TEN more than the
P.C. member's
suggestion of
18 and
4 more than the original
plan.
By the end of the 2nd P.C. meeting the commission members were
understandably "irritated ". The neighborhood had spent several hours and
two full meetings literally talking to the developer about their concerns.
Mr. Haymaker was "verbally reprimanded" for not having a neighborhood
meeting to answer all of these questions BEFORE reaching the P.C.. He
pushed the blame onto me saying, "Well, Sharon said she was speaking FOR
THE NEIGHBORHOOD!" This, of course, was ridiculous. I had already spent
50 hours over the last month answering the neighbors questions about this
project. In effect, I was fielding all of the "flack" for Mark. In hindsight,
I should have just told them to call Mr. Haymaker and let him explain HIS
project. As the word got around, more people would call and I'd have to,
start all over again.
The overloaded traffic in the area continues to worry us. Mr.
Haymaker stated at the 2nd P.C. meeting that the traffic in the area would
be greatly reduced since "300 cars a day pass through the FINA
station." (At the Edina meeting he reduced it to 200 and then 160.) If
there were 200 -300 cars a day at that station, FINA would not be closing
it. I checked with the station and it was determined to be more like 65
cars a day. It should be noted that many of the FINA customers are
traveling East and West, or are people already shopping the area. The new
residents of this complex would undoubtedly, like many people, use
Halifax as a shortcut down to 5400 on their way to Southdale to avoid two
traffic lights. (At the first P.C. meeting, the transparency map of the area
did not even SHOW the section of Halifax on the map that enters at the
curve.
Mr. Haymaker, after - the -fact and under suggestion from the P.C.,
said he would call a neighborhood meeting the next Thursday. He and
Randa Hahn (realtor for the 3rd house that is for sale) told me that they
would get the mailing list of the neighborhood and send notices out.
However, after contacting City Hall on Tuesday of the next week, he still
hadn't requested the mailing list. Both Lynne Griffith and myself had to
call him because we still hadn't received any information. He told Lynne
that the notices were "at the printers." Yet several hours later a simple
"Xerox" notice was placed in our mailslots. By Tuesday evening, many
people had already made plans. Plus, by scheduling the meeting at 6:00,
many people were barely getting home from work.
Mr. Haymaker told me that notices were sent out to Halifax and
Indianola. He told Lynne that he also did Arden. However, after covering
the neighborhood for the petition to reduce the length by 50 feet, we
discovered that he HAD NOT sent notices to all of those houses . NO ONE on
the 5100 block of Indianola, or the West side of the 5000 block of
Indianola, or anyone on Arden (as well as, the Lanterns) had received a
notice of anykind. Additional notices were hand delivered to the 5200 to
5400 blocks of Halifax. On short notice 38 people showed up for his
meeting. Many people were hearing about this for the first time and
wanted to see the drawings. However, Mr. Haymaker's architect never
showed up with the plans and drawings.
Luckily, the initial presentation and most of the questions at the
Edina Realy neighborhood meeting were covered by Mark's attorney, Tracy
Eichorn - Hicks. It is the overwhelming opinion of the area that Mr.
Haymaker has had a condescending attitude, towards all of us. His
attorney was both open to our comments and willing to further discuss our
questions, even after the March 21 meeting. Mr. Haymaker was not! If
Tracy had handled this issue from the beginning we feel everything would
have run smoother.
When the overall length issue was brought up at the Edina meeting,
Mr. Haymaker stated, and this is a DIRECT QUOTE, "The length of the
building bothers me, too. It looks like a railroad freight house.
I'd like to shrink it in and do the 4 stories." When the traffic
problem was brought up he stated (direct quote), "I didn't even think of
the traffic when I made the proposal. I have no objections to
looking at closing off Halifax." (Since the traffic count was taken
years ago, when we tried unsuccessfully to close Halifax, and it was
determined that the street was TOO BUSY TO CLOSE, this is not even an
option, in my opinion.)
Even after hearing all of our concerns
about the size of the building
and the added "confusion" to the traffic problem, the P.C. voted 6 to 0 to
pass it on to you.
The petitions, for many sections
of the streets, are
incomplete because of:
(1) Two people have not turned in
their petitions yet. You will
get them Monday before the meeting.
(2) MANY people were not home, even
after to attempts.
(3) Most residents (Indianola, Maple,
Gorgas) didn't know
ANYTHING about the project, and the
Sun Current article had not
come out yet.
(4) The illness of the person doing
Indianola.
I'm sorry this got so long. Now, I don't have the time to
write a general letter to all of you about our concerns. I'm sure
you have grasped our feelings after reading some, part, or all of
this episode of neighborhood Soal Opera.
We hope that we can count on you to help us reduce the size
by 50 feet, guarantee the landscaping, and do something to
handle the traffic congestion and cutting down Halifax.
Thank you for your time.
S
Sincerely,
Sharon and Dave Maetzold
5114 Halifax Ave. So.
Edina, MN 55424
-Mon,
c
rl-
�/ 1 -� /,R L)
,x la I il J1 I I f- ALI%—
r-Al belw F-�LtJ t-A ravk
/?A 0
EY-) i it GLi
r\of c s lcv) n4.o -0-A
I A,'L-t 1A n— CEt4:6 J W (It"s
cx YnjnLu
P- ta V x n SIM
tyc-0
aryvu� 'LLvaL
�VUCL
ICA-
V
44,Lk--, v1 vV1-k-7' ✓I C,-, L,(-qll-t
IN
T ll\fJ V-I� V
L
TC)(D
�__._ �2�- e -c-��! r1��,__��c�ZC�� �� j-- Y1LCt�2 r!- ce_.p -5
-1-cis
t--,A az--rno-A
Lo
V
N
uy N \
0 H
m vFi F
� w z
I
1
` � V
�r
N � r
4!
V
.J
DATE: March 14, 1994
TO: City Council
FROM: Lynne Griffith - Res
5124 Halifax Ave.
Edina, MN 55424
SUBJECT: Proposed Condominium Complex at
50th and Halifax Ave.
I am sending you this letter in hopes that I will finally be heard!!!
I have tremendous concerns for the proposed condominium complex at 50th and Halifax
Ave. My major concerns are with the physical size (particularly the length of 256 feet),
the impact on traffic to an already overloaded street, and the overall physical appearance
of the structure.
I DO WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR AT THIS TIME THAT I AM NOT OPPOSED TO
THE IDEA OF A CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AT THIS LOCATION, JUST THE
IDEA OF ANY STRUCTURE THAT DOES NOT ENHANCE THE APPEARANCE
OF THE 50TH & FRANCE DOWNTOWN SHOPPING DISTRICT.
• PHYSICAL SIZE - Right now the proposed 28 unit structure is at 3 stories high and
256 feet (just 44 feet short in the length of an entire football field). The size alone of
this building is out of character with the beautiful charm and style of the downtown
Edina neighborhood shopping district. A shorter more tasteful building would not
only fit in the neighborhood better, but it would also help with some of the other
issues: more room for the cars to get in and out of the underground parking, more
room for the landscaping necessary to buffer the neighborhood, and possibly leave
enough room for a drop off area
• TRAFFIC IMPACT - The 50th and Halifax area is already overloaded. Mr. _
Haymaker claims (without any factual information to back it up) that the proposed
condominium unit will create less traffic than the existing FINA station. Anyone who
truly knows the area can tell you that FINA does not create as much traffic as the 56
tenants who will be occupying the new building. Infact,. a good number of the
FINA customers happen to be people in our neighborhood. Hence, more traffic will
be created with this unit. Please remember that I am not opposed to this dwelling,
just the size of it. I believe that a smaller, building with less tenants will help in two
ways. #1 - Of course you'll have less tenants. What if it went back to Mr.
Haymaker's original plan to have 24 units / 48 tenants. Less people - Less Traffic.
#2 - A smaller building will allow for more room on the property for vehicle drop offs
and pull overs instead of using a lane of Halifax which seems to be Mr. Haymaker's
current plan. It is evident to all the residents that Mr. Haymaker hasn't thought very
much of the the traffic ramifications. In fact at the neighborhood meeting with Mr.
Haymaker he even said, " I didn't think of the traffic when I made the proposal."
• PHYSICAL APPEARANCE - Right now it is hard to know what Mr. Haymaker has
planned for the exterior of the structure, however one of my main concerns is with the
building materials. Mr. Haymaker first said that the building would be made of
concrete and stucco like products. Later Mr. Haymaker mentioned possibly using
brick or brick like products, but would not commit . to anything. Using concrete
products coupled with the enormous size of this building, will make it look like Edina
has a Jail in their downtown area.
I have noted all my-concerns to date in this letter. As a Taxpayer in the immediate
downtown area I urge you not to vote for the proposed structure as presented.
AGENDA ITEM II. A.
L'
Dear Neighbors,
It was suggested by City Hall that it would be most effective if we
each write a letter to: The City Council voicing our concerns about the
proposed 28 unit, 256 foot long condominium complex at 50th and Halifax.
It doesn't need to be very long. The number of PEOPLE RESPONDING
is important, not the number of sentences in our letter. The comments in
the neighborhood seem to be centered on these key issues:
(1) It's too long at 256 feet. Can't it be shortened by 50 ft?
(2) The traffic patterns in the area are already overloaded.
(3) We need to keep the existing trees and guarantee that the new
landscaping will enhance the neighborhood.
Your letters need to reach "Jackie" in the the City Planner's
Office by late Thursday afternoon, March 17. (If mailing? Edina
City Hall; c/o Jackie, City Planner's Office; 4801 W. 50th St.; Edina, MN
55424). She will include these letters in the information packets sent to
each City Council member in preparation for the City Council meeting on
Monday, March 21 at 7:00. (Hope to see you at the meeting, also!)
P.S. Write the letter to the CITY COUNCIL, not the City Planner.
Thank you for your support. We're counting on you!
1
CL IL-4
RICHARD S. STONE.JR. AGENDA ITEM II A
5028 JUANITA AVE. SO.
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55424
18
% 06 J FC7T io i{//S 'PA0,005qL- 8zxc gres4i o,c
i
9,rb D �,��� y 9 Q/G V /i✓C TWAT
On/ 7-1146
Cso r H` E.yp �nf0 uta �F Al- 04 1,ioA,6 s rO,Q /,s
aai r,yi_' 3oclrH c.rte 1 7/V4 9yr9RrlllAp T
A T
1iV,06ANdLi¢
3 04r
J�ovjy 0/— 574
�Ak h�a 1(FR r/rc o r�ie Tf/� �i SrD,e y
MMES /,y %l�I /S
W--,4 /�'{fllN ?e9 /n/EQ
W6lily AssE-ss�
N,E /G y,goQhroo� �MOU�p .t3.E
A /Ar5)'"AA-E
0
:l1
r
w9�1r\
e4 i_i'y cn`
O
HrJ � .� � •ay�
\�URR111N� //
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: Craig Larsen
Date: March 21, 1994
Subject: 1994 Community
Development Block
Grant Proqram
Recommendation:
Agenda Item ,. T T. B
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
Approve recommended budget for submission to Hennepin County.
Info /Background
Edina's 1994 CDBG entitlement is $197,821 out of the County's $3,688.000.00
budget. This allocation reflects a 10.8% increase over the 1993 budget and is attributed
to the 10.8% increase Hennepin County received from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
On Tuesday, March 15, 1994, planning staff presented a proposed budget to the
Human Relations Commission. The Commission recommended approval of the
proposed budget, however, voted to amend the public service funding portion to reflect
no increase for the H.O.M.E. program over 1993 ($24074) and the additional $490.00
which was proposed for H.O.M.E. to be redirected toward the Child Day Care program,
increasing that proposal from $13,000 to $13,490. As a result of the amended proposal,
H.O.M.E. would utilize 61 % of the public services funding; Day care subsidy would utilize
34% and C.A.S.H. Homeline would utilize the remaining 5 %.
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve recommended budget for submission to Hennepin County.
Info /Background
Edina's 1994 CDBG entitlement is $197,821 out of the County's $3,688.000.00
budget. This allocation reflects a 10.8% increase over the 1993 budget and is attributed
to the 10.8% increase Hennepin County received from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
On Tuesday, March 15, 1994, planning staff presented a proposed budget to the
Human Relations Commission. The Commission recommended approval of the
proposed budget, however, voted to amend the public service funding portion to reflect
no increase for the H.O.M.E. program over 1993 ($24074) and the additional $490.00
which was proposed for H.O.M.E. to be redirected toward the Child Day Care program,
increasing that proposal from $13,000 to $13,490. As a result of the amended proposal,
H.O.M.E. would utilize 61 % of the public services funding; Day care subsidy would utilize
34% and C.A.S.H. Homeline would utilize the remaining 5 %.
v
Recommended Budget:
Project
Proposed 1994 Budget
Last Year
C.A.S.H., HOMELine
$ 2,000
$ 1,618
Child Day Care Subsidy
$13,490
$10,000
Housing and Outdoor Maintenance $24,074
.$24,074
for the Elderly H.O. M. E.
Adaptive Recreation
$ 1,500
$ 2,000
Rehabilitation of Private Prop.
$40,000
$40,000
Removal of Arch. Barriers
$116,757
$100,000
$197,821
$178,458
MEMORAONUM
TO:
Human Relations Commission
FROM:
Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Proposed 1994 Community Development Block Grant
C.A.S.H. $ 1,618
Budget (CDBG)
DATE:
March 15, 1994
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has informed
Hennepin County that the Urban Hennepin County CDBG entitlement grant for 1994
is $3,688,000. This represents a 10% increase from the 1993 funding level of
$3,327,000.
As in previous years, the distribution formula for each city is based upon
population, the number of individuals with incomes at or below poverty level, and
the number of overcrowded housing units. Poverty data is a double weighted factor
in the formula. All data is derived from the 1990 U.S. Census.
The City of Edina's 1994 entitlement has been set at $197,821 which
represents a 10% increase over the 1993 entitlement of $178,458.
As in previous years, the funding of public services is limited to no more than
20% of the budget. That being the case, the 1994 public service funding can not
exceed $39,564.
The following data includes the public service budget for 1993, the amounts
requested for 1994, and the proposed public service budget for 1994:
1993
1994
1994
Budget
Request
Awad
C.A.S.H. $ 1,618
$ 4,000
$ 2,000
Daycare Subsidy $10,000
$15,000
$14000
Housing and Outdoor
Maintenance for the
Elderly (H.O.M.E.) $24,074 $26,480 $210"
Total $35,692 $45,480 $39,564
The difference between the funds requested versus the funds available is
$5,916.00. In an effort to equitably distribute the funds to the three agencies an
approximate $2,000 decrease per request has been proposed, still providing each
agency with an increase over the 1993 budget.
The remaining 80% of the 1994 CDBG entitlement, $158,257 is proposed to
be directed toward the following activities:
1993 1994
Budget Proposal
Adaptive Recreation $ 2,000 $ 1,500
Rehabilitation of Private
Property $ 40,000 $ 40,000
Removal of Architectural
Barriers (ADA Compliance) $100,000 $116,757
Total $142,766 $158,257
The Adaptive Recreation program provides interpreters for the hearing
impaired participating in park and recreation programs. The proposed budget
illustrates a $500.00 reduction over 1993 because the total funds spent from the
Year XVIII program were only $1,200. (Last years funds have yet to be spent.) It
is felt that the $1,500 proposed will more closely meet the demand.
The Rehabilitation of Private Property Program provides up to $10,000 for
home improvements to low and moderate income homeowners. Most grants
average from $4,000.00 to $8,000.00 with some utilizing the entire $10,000. In 1993,
nine households were served with no waiting list.
The Removal of Architectural Barriers program will again be directed toward
meeting the goals for ADA compliance as established by the City's consultants.
Currently, the 1993 funds are providing curb cut improvements to city buildings and
park property city -wide. Once accessibility to city structures has been addressed,
accessibility within the facilities will be scheduled.
The City Council hearing on the proposed budget will take place on Monday,
March 21, 1994, in time to submit the approved budget to Hennepin County by the
deadline of April 1, 1994.
Any comments or suggestions the Human Relation Commissions can offer
prior to the proposed budget submittal to the City Council will be greatly
appreciated.
1994 PROPOSED CDBG BUDGET
C.A.S.H. HOMELINE
DAYCARE SUBSIDY
HOUSING AND OUTDOOR MAINTENANCE FOR
THE ELDERLY (H.O.M.E.)
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
(ADA COMPLIANCE)
$ 2,000.00
$ 13,000.00
$ 24,564.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 40,000.00
$116,757.00
$197,821.00
Community Action
for Suburban Hennepin
Mr. Craig Larsen
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
January 31, 1994
Dear Mr. Larsen:
Norwest Bank Building
1011 First Street S., Suite 301
Hopkins, MN 55343
(612) 933 -9180
FAX (612) 933 -6147
This letter is to request funding in the amount of $4,000 from the city's Community
Development Block Grant program for 1994. Funds will be used to support HOME Line, the
housing services program of Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH).
HOME Line was begun by CASH in January 1992. Over the past two years, HOME Line has
developed four housing programs for low and moderate income homeowners and renters:
- 1) a tenant "hotline" to assist tenants with rental housing problems;
- 2) tenant organizing assistance to educate and train low income tenants to work together to
solve common problems in a given complex;
- 3) a mortgage foreclosure prevention program to provide personal, technical, and financial
help to homeowners facing foreclosure due to circumstances beyond their control; and
- 4) free legal help and financial assistance for families with children facing eviction.
These programs are described in more detail in the HOME Line Program Description enclosed. I
have also included a 1994 operating budget for our housing services and a fact sheet that details
HOME Line's tenant advocacy and foreclosure prevention activities in Edina.
Altogether, HOME Line has assisted approximately 10,000 suburban Hennepin County residents
since it began operation in early 1992. Well over 90% of these people have low or moderate
incomes by HUD standards.
We appreciate your willingness to consider our request for support. If you have questions or
need additional information, please feel free to contact Charlie Warner, our Housing Programs
Manager, at 933 -9180. We would also appreciate being informed of any public meetings or
hearings at which your 1994 CDBG program is considered.
Sincerely,
Sharon A. Johnson
Executive Director
Enclosures as noted
Working to eliminate the causes of poverty.
HOME Line Data for Edina
Tenantadvocacy
•
I ROME Line operates a "hotline" (933 -0017) to assist tenants experiencing problems with their rental
rousing situation. The hotline is open from 9am to 6pm weekdays (closes at 3pm on Fridays). We maintain a
computerized database documenting all calls. The following summary information is taken from that database.
Number of calls received from Edina residents since start -up (January 1992)
Number of calls received from Edina residents during 1993
Total number of Edina residents served (= number of calls x average household size)
Percentages of Edina residents served by HOME Line that are:
Low income*
44.7%
Moderate income*
23.7%
Higher income*
31.6%
elow are the problem areas most frequently encountered by callers to HOME Line county -wide. The
numbers show how many times each was mentioned by callers from Edina:
Since During
1992 1993
Eviction
13
8
Repairs
28
14
Security Deposit
29
14
Discrimination
1
1
Harrassmant
1
1
Intrusion
7
2
Heat
1
1
Improper Notice
1
1
Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention
141
78
323
During 1992, HOME Line established a new program to assist homeowners facing the possible loss of their
homes to foreclosure. Assistance provided ranges from budget counselling to securing emergency financial aid
I
o arranging mortgage refinancing. Financial aid has been secured from a variety of public and private
sources, including an emergency loan fund operated by Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH),
-TOME Line's parent agency.
Number of Edina homeowners assisted during 1993
Financial assistance raised on behalf of Edina homeowners
13
$9,832
;;ounty -wide, the Foreclosure Prevention program assisted 287 homeowners of whom 64.1% were low
� icome *, 25.4% were moderate income *, and 10.5% were higher income.* More than $1,460,000 in
nortgage refinances were closed or in process during 1993, resulting in an average monthly savings of
149.24 to the benefitted homeowners. A total of $121,764 in emergency financial aid,was raised on behalf
of eligible homeowners.
According to HUD definitions
HOME Line Housing Services
HOME Line is a program of Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH)
1994 Operating Budget
USES of FUNDS
Salaries
$134,865
Benefits
31,000
Contract Attorney
25,600
Utilities
1,000
Mileage /Parking
3,000
Training
5,000
Consultants
10,000
Rent
17,400
Telephone (incl. LD and FAX)
6,000
Meeting Expenses
1,000
Postage
3,000
Printing & Copying
2,000
Maintenance & Repairs
750
Advertising
1,400
Equipment & Furnishings
5,000
Memberships
1,000
Insurance
475
Supplies
2,000
Subscriptions & Publications
500
TOTAL Uses 250,990
SOURCES of FUNDS
Municipal CDBG
County Homeless Prevention and Assistance
Community Service Block Grant (CSBG)'
TOTAL Sources
50,000
25,600
175,390
$250,990
CSBG is the principle source of funding for Community Action
for Suburban Hennepin. These are federal "anti- poverty" funds
provided to CASH through the MN Department of Jobs and Training.
(January 1994)
HOMEr
d
Introduction
Services for Suburban I Iconcpin Tenants
• Advice • Access to Legal Assistance • Information
933 -0017 1206 Mainstreet, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
HOME Line Program Description
(January 1994)
HOME Line is the name given to CASH's set of housing services that operate in suburban Hennepin County.
These currently include tenant advocacy (started in January 1992), tenant organizing (May 1992), mortgage
foreclosure prevention counselling (August 1992), and legal defense for families facing eviction (September
1993). CASH, standing for Community Action for Suburban Hennepin, is the "anti- poverty agency" serving low
income people throughout Minneapolis' suburbs. It is a private nonprofit corporation with tax - exempt status
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. CASH is funded primarily with federal grants passed to
us through the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training. Additional funding is provided by Hennepin County,
the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), ACTION, and several suburban Hennepin municipalities.
Tenant Advocacy
The advocacy service assists individual tenants and is provided primarily over the phone (the "hotline "),
although tenants do occasionally drop in to the office. Individual advocacy includes identifying the tenant's
problem, providing accurate and timely information on relevant tenant /landlord rights and responsibilities,
helping the tenant understand options they might use to remedy their problem, and, often, mailing out printed
materials provided to us by Legal Aid. As advocates gain experience and expertise, there may be opportunities
to assist individual tenants prepare for court and, in some cases, represent them in court.
More complex cases are often referred to Legal Aid or to volunteer ( pro bono) lawyers through the Hennepin
County Bar Association's Legal Advice Clinic. Frequently, advocates will assist by referring tenants to other
services and programs to help with problems that may be outside the sphere of tenant /landlord issues. Where
advocates discover problems affecting many or all tenants in a complex, they may refer the case to HOME
Line's tenant organizer.
Tenant Organizing
Where circumstances warrant and general problems exist, HOME Line's tenant organizer will work with groups
of tenants to address problems collectively. Collective tenant action has been used in situations involving poor
maintenance and repair throughout a complex, abusive behavior against tenants by management or maintenance
personnel, and violation of regulations governing various housing assistance programs. Often, especially in
cases involving government- assisted housing, HOME Line will secure assistance for the tenant group from Legal
Aid.
The organizing project has helped to form a county -wide tenant organization, the Suburban Association For
Empowering Tenants (SAFE -T), to promote education on tenant /landlord rights and responsibilities and other
housing issues. We are also actively assisting in the formation of a state -wide tenants group, the Minnesota
Tenants Network. The Network is primarily focused on improving tenant /landlord law through legislative
work.
a program sponsored by Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) 933 -9180
HOME Line Program Description
Page 2.
Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention
HOME Line's Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention program helps lower income homeowners who are facing fore-
closure and the possible loss of their homes due to circumstances beyond their control. Often this is caused by
a family break -up (divorce, abandonment, or death of a spouse) or the loss of a job due to economic dis-
location. Intensive individual financial counselling with the homeowner and prompt, knowledgeable negotiations
with the lender can sometimes save the situation.
The foreclosure prevention staff assist homeowners gain access to public and private financial resources to
help solve a delinquency. Where appropriate, a last- resort loan will be made to the homeowner to bring the
loan current. The loan is non - interest bearing and comes due on sale of the property or when it is no longer
owner - occupied. The program's Emergency Loan Fund is capitalized with funds from CASH; additional loan
funds are available to the program through the MHFA's Emergency Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program .
Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance
This is Home Line's newest program, funded by Hennepin County in September 1993. Through this county
assistance, we contract with an attorney in private practice to provide legal advice, help with negotiations,
courtroom representation, and, for income - eligible households, emergency loans for families with children who
are facing eviction from their homes. The program operates primarily in the Brookdale division of Hennepin
County District Court. Most assisted families live in Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, New Hope, Robbinsdale,
and Crystal.
Staffing
HOME Line's storefront office on Mainstreet in downtown Hopkins is staffed by CASH employees, VISTAs
(Volunteers in Service to America, a program of the federal ACTION office) and volunteers from the
community. CASH /HOME Line staff include the director of the tenant advocacy program, a tenant organizer,
the director of the foreclosure prevention program and her assistant, and an overall housing programs
manager. CASH also contracts with an attorney in private practice to provide eviction defense to families with
children. The VISTAs are assigned, one each, to the tenant advocacy program and the tenant organizing
program. Volunteers serve primarily as tenant advocates.
We work closely with the Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis. Legal Aid lawyers train our volunteer advocates in
Minnesota tenant /landlord law and provide back -up advice to advocates. Legal Aid lawyers also provide
representation to tenant groups organized through HOME Line.
Because volunteers are a critical element in HOME Line's success, we place strong emphasis on their
recruitment, training, and recognition.
Volunteer Involvement
Volunteers are a mainstay of much of HOME Line's work. Our tenant hotline is staffed in large part by
volunteers recruited from area law schools and the suburban community. The tenant organizing program works
with groups of volunteer tenants seeking to improve their collective situation. SAFE -T and the Minnesota
Tenants Network are totally volunteer organizations. The Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention program utilizes a
five - person Loan Committee composed of volunteers from the CASH board and from the community. Law
students also volunteer with HOME Line's Family Homelessness Prevention and Assistance program. Law
student volunteers, provided to the project through the Minnesota Justice Foundation, interview clients,
prepare trial documents, and represent eviction defendants in court under the supervision of HOME Line's
contract attorney. Altogether, over 3,000 hours of volunteer time are donated to HOME Line each year.
(1/94)
FROM GMDCA
February 17, 1994
Joyce.Repya
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Stree
Edina,41VIN 554
Dear Joyce,
P. I
On behalf of the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA), I am requesting
that the Edina City Council consider using 15,000 of their Year XX Community
Development Block Grant (CD8G) funds for the child care sliding fee programs. This
amount would help three to five Edina families.
During the 1993 -94 CDBG funding year, the Edina subsidy program has helped four
families move toward self - sufficiency. There are 34 eligible Edina families on the waiting
list. I have enclosed a report showing the balance In your account as of 12- 31 -93.
There are several programs that help families pay for child care while the parent Is In
school or In a low paying lob. When a family calls and Is proven eligible, their name
goes on to the county wafting list, as well as on the waiting list for their city if that city
has a subsidy program. The county list moves very slowly, because once a family is
taken on, they may need help for a long time, with less assistance as their children grow
older. At the present funding of the county program, families have to wait at least one
year for subsidy.
The city waiting lists move more quickly as the list Is only for residents of that city, and
once a resident is getting help and their name comes up on the county list, they are
moved to that source of funding, making way for another city family on that city's
program. This system maximizes the use of city money, but the paperwork and time
moving families from one program to another slows the use of city funds.
As mentioned before, an Edina child care subsidy program benefits your families trying to
move toward self - sufficiency. On their behalf, I hope you can fit the subsidy program
Into your Year XX CDBG funding package.
The stdff at GMDCA also urge the Edina City Council to lobby for county and state
funding for the Phild care sliding fee program. Then City of Edina money could be used
for other programs.
Thank you for your past Involvement In this program. Please call If i can get any,other
Information to you. I will try to attend your public hearing.
Sincerely,
Grace Norris
Community Services Coordinator
GN:wp
Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association
Constance C. Bell, Executive Director , 1628 Elliot Avenue South a Minneapolis, MN 55404 - -
(612) 341 -1177 0 Fax (612) 341 -4356 ■ Voice/T'DD (612) 341 -2066 a An Equal Opportunity Employer
�1Man0e► 'B Fund Qrlw
m
z
v
•
a
a
Brooklyn Park
Crystal
Eden Prairie
Edina
Golden Valley
Hopkins
Maple Grove
Minnetonka
New Hope
Richfield
Robbinsdale
St. Louis Park
St. Louis Park -
Comrnun'rty Ed.
REPORT ON CDBG CHILD CARE FUNDING AS OF 12131/93 1
0 FamMes
Carrengy Served
2
3
4
3
2
2
.1
1
0
1
4
6
X Unduplicated
Fames Served S On
711193 - 12011 W-2109 L)st
3
168
3
65
B
72
4
34
3
27
3
68
2
36
2
40
2
51
1
120
1
38
8
130
26 7
' = includes roll back Year 18 funds.
Year 19
Fund 8atanse
$20,710.74
$ 6,899.19
$11,184.02
$ 6,063.81
$ 8,886.00
$ 5,620.46
$ 1,600.00
S 8,340.90
$ 12,402.92
S 2,299.37
$ 4,58280
$ MIA
Yew 18
fund Ralenoe
N/A
-0-
-a
-a
S 2,249.15
-0-
0$4,014.80
-a
-0-
-0-
-0-
• $ 4,410.86
" $ 688.86
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone 541 -1019 Fax 541 -0841
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Tom Ticen
President
February 8, 1994
Carla Pavone
tst Vice President
Bob Zagaros
Mr. Craig Larson, City Planner
2nd Vice President
City of Edina
Marty Guritz
4801 West 50th Street
Secretary
Edina, MN 55424
John Young
Treasurer
Dear Mr. Larson:
Daraiyn Pelfar
Member -at -Large
John Nelson
Member -at -Large
Robert DeGhetto
Member -at -Large
Mary Anderson
Lucille Crow
Karl Dansky
Alison Fuhr
William H. Gray
Alko Higuchi
Dwight Johnson
Tad Jude
Kevin Krueger
Senator Gen Olson
Ryan Schroeder
William G. Weiler
Benjamin.F Withhart
Executive Director & C.E.O.
PROGRAMS
• Community
Senior Groups
• H.O.M.E.
• Multi- purpose
Senior Centers
• Senior Outreach
• Seniors Serving
Business
A united way
ALSOKY
%41 recycledpaper
Senior Community Services is requesting that the City of Edina
allocate $26,480 for the 1994 -'95 fiscal year from it's share of
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Year XX (July 1,
1994 - June 30, 1995) funds to support the HOME Program. It has
become increasingly difficult, with decreases in funding for the
past three years from the United Way (due to poor campaigns)
and from contributions, for Senior Community Services to fill
the gap between the HOME Program's expenses and revenues.
This is the reason for the larger than average request for an
increase this year.
Edina's CDBG funds will still be leveraged from client fees,
funding from the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches
(GMCC) and from donations. The HOME Program operates on a
sliding fee scale. On average clients cover approximately one
-third of the Programs' cost. GMCC funding, utilizing Federal
Title III monies, helps to subsidize chore services. Friends of
HOME, an organization that solicits private donations, helps to
fill the remaining gap between the City's CDBG funds and the
total Program expense.
I have enclosed a copy of the 1993 Summary of Service report,
including figures for the City of Edina, and the 1993 Survey
Evaluation Results. If you have any questions, or if the Mayor
and City Council would like to have an informational
presentation, please let me know.
Sincerely,
.7 /1
Ron Bloch
Program Administrator
H.O.M.E. (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly)
—f
---------------
Summary of Service 1993
Maintenance
Homemaker
Total
BLOOMINGTON
# of Customers
213
127
340
# of Households-:
167
113
280
# of jobs
913
1804
2717
# of hours
2331
3911
6242
RICHFIELD
# of Customers
113
66
179
# of Households:'
95
57
152
# of jobs
# of hours
533
1198
950
2039
1483
3237
------------
EDINA
# of Customers
881
94
182
--------------------
# of Households!
65
81
146
# of jobs
443
12071
1650
# of hours
1050
28301
3880
EDEN PRAIRIE
# of
23
23[
46
-Customers
# of Households::
18
221
40
# of jobs
40
3771
417
-----------------------
# of hours
124
783
907
ST. LOUIS PARK:
# of Customers
# of Households::
5
31
6
3
# of jobs
3
3
# of hours
119
119
CHANHASSEN
# of Customers
11
1
12
# of Households:,
8T
1
9
# of jobs
12
6
18
# of hours
117
17
134
MINNETONKA
# of Customers i
145
1
121
157
# of Households::
1061
121
118
# of jobs
174
1031
277
# of hours
744
2721
1016
BROOKLYN CENTER
# of Customers
281
28
# of Households::
221
22
# of jobs
32
32
# of hours
629
629
TOTAL
# of Customers
6261
323
949
# of Households
4841
286
770
# of jobs
21501
4447
6597
I # of hours
63121
9852
16164,
Program-HOME (Household and.0utside
Maintenance for Elderly)
Client Survey Response
Please fill in the following blanks with the total. number of clients that responded to that.
particular question. If you conduct a survey twice a year, please combine the totals so that
only one number appears on each line. Due to programs conducting the survey at various
times, please indicate the time period the results cover.
Time period the below information covers.
1. (;#;g Number of surveys sent.
2. 320 Number of surveys returned.
48% of returned surveys.
3. How satisfied are you with the work done?
256 very satisfied
on% of above
January 1, 1993 thru November 1993
62 Satisfied
7n % of above
1 Not satisfied
o % of above
4. Do you feel that the services you receive help you to continue to live in your own home?
269 Very much
85% of above
42 Somewhat
14 % of above
5. 36 Number of people making a contribution.
11 % of people making a contribution.
6. $525 Total contributions made.
9 Do not help
1 % of above
or
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosiand. City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE 21 March, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Marking Paint
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Linear Dynamics, Inc.
i 2. Diamond Vogel Paints
3• Centerline Industries
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Linear Dynamics, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
$ 5,306.90
2. $ 7,036.03
3- NO BID
4.
5.
$ 5,306.90
This purchu._;'e is -for- traffic paint for our City streets for 1994.
The purchase is funded from the general fund in the Public Works
area.
Public Works - Streets
Si natur � Deo Ltj
The Recommenaed bid is — X%
within buaget not within tud�et n Wallin. �• ance Urector
Kenneth Rosiand. City
91�a fir.
4, ��jlti
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and City Council
FROM: John Kepri os
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: March 7, 1994
AGENDA ITEM IV. B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Work Vehicle - Braemar Golf Course
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
MTI Distributinq Co. 1 $10,863.00
2. Cushman Motor Co. 2 $11,061.09
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
MTI Distributing Co. - $10,863.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
!fork Vehicle for Braemar Golf Course.
In budget for new 9 -hole course.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within
1
Finance Director
Rosland Citid Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosiand City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE 21 March, 1994
AGENDA ITEM IV.C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Utility Department Van
i
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
i
1. Thane Hawkins Chevrolet
1. $ 13,066.49
2. (Henn. Co. Contract #2843A3)
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Thane Hawkins Chevrolet
$ 13,066.49
GENERAL INFORMATION:
i This vehicle purchase is from the Hennepin
County contract
i and is a replacement vehicle for a 1985 Astro Van with
100,000 miles (Unit 50 -267). This purchase will be funded
from the equipment replacement fund in the
water and sewer
utility fund.
l
etc Public
Works - Utility
gnat
Department
The Recommenced bid is
'
within budget not within ' d
o . Finan Director
i
enneth Rosi
d City Manager
r
A
0 �1
REPORTIRECOMMENDATION
To:
Agenda Item ,.
v. A.
Kenneth Rosland
Consent
From:
David A. Velde
Information Only
Date:
March 21, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
j I
To HRA
71
To Council
Subject:
Petition to keep
'
extra pets; 4737
Action
F7
Motion
Hibiscus Avenue.
I
I!
Resolution
Ordinance i
I�!
Discussion I
REPORT:
Attached is a finding to permit Mr. and Mrs. Wright to keep two dogs and three cats.
The conditions as directed by the Edina City Council are included in these findings.
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING PETITION OF: William & Sandra Wright, 4737 Hibiscus Avenue
The Edina City Council at a regular meeting has duly
considered the above Petition and after hearing and examining all
of the evidence and the file herein does hereby:
- FIND-AS FACT:
1. Petition filed February 25, 1994
2. Fee paid ,February 25, 1994
3. Notice mailed February 28, 1994
4. The proposed permit would:
A. Not be a nuisance.
B. Not be detrimental to the public health and safety of
the applicant or other persons in the vicinity.
CONCLUSION:
A. The procedural requirements of the Ordinance have
been met.
B. The permit should be granted as requested.
C. Conditions or restrictions applicable to this
permit:
The two dogs will be kept in the fenced area, the
three cats will be kept indoors with one cat having
limited freedom outdoors. Observe all requlations
relative to Animal Control Ordinance.
D. This permit shall be effective March 21, 1994
however, this permit shall lapse and be of no
effect unless all conditions and restrictions are
observed and the applicant observes all City
Ordinances applicable to the keeping of dogs and
cats.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
City Clerk
Dated
J
r \\
o e} 4'
O1
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
I Agenda Item v. B.
From:
David A. Velde
Consent
F-1,
Information Only
Date:
March 21, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject:
Petition to keep
To Council
six dogs; 4817
Vandervork Avenue.
Action
0
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
REPORT:
On March 3, 1994, Mr. George Tate, 4817 Vandervork Avenue submitted an application
to keep six dogs at his address. On March 11, 1994, notice was sent to all properties
within 200 feet of Mr. Tates residence advising them about the request. No comments
have been received.
PET PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICANT NAME: i ��G.�(� L� ALL
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
APPLICANT
TELEPHONE NO.:
H J�14 60 J G
W 5-q - G/G/
NUMBER OF
PETS:
4 DOGS
CATS.
CIRCLE ONE
pOG CAT :
DOG /CAT:
DOG /CAT:
BREED 45V6 COLOR Liv ulrf T SEX %-
BREED t k
BREED it
DOG /CAT: BREED et
DOG /CAT: BREED
DOG /CAT: BREED Lti(s 04exe�51--
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
COLOR L SEX /—
COLOR wrrr Ali SEX �-
COLOR
Rf.K eo-tr
SEX
il't
COLOR
Z<<
SEX
COLOR
% u rY?,fx)
SEX
m
AGE 11 ' I
AGE �//?
AGE C12
AGE Z
AGE Z �L
AGE l
Pursuant to City Code section 300 the undersigned requests
permission from the Edina City Council to keep more than three
pets. The applicant understands that the permit, if granted, is
not transferrable to another address, person or pet. Any change in
this permit application will require applying for a new permit.,
DATE: /5 /-7/ SIGNATURE: Jc
�r
A lass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: MARCH 17, 1994
Subject: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE AND
3.2 BEER LICENSE
GREAT FOOD, INC.
DBA /ORIGINAL PANCAKE HOL'
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -v--c
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
Ex I
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
�--
Ordinance
Discussion
Approval of issuance of an On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer License to
Great Food, Inc. at 3501 [Jest 70th Street, dba /Original Pancake House /My Pie.
Info /Background
The City has received applications for an On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer
License from Great Food, Inc. who are the new owners for the Original Pancake
House /My Pie restaurant.
The applications have been reviewed by the Police and Health Departments
and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Memorandums are
attached in support of issuance of the-requested licenses.
If the Council approves issuance of the licenses, the required documents will
be sent to Minnesota Liquor Control for their approval of the On -Sale Wine
License.
CITY OF EDINA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 16, 1994
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
City Council
FROM: William Bernhjelm, Chief of Police
Sgt. S.A. Schwartz, Jr.
SUBJECT: Wine License Renewals
Renewal applications for the following establishments have been received:
Rossini's Restaurant - 7373 France Ave. S.
No information is available which would preclude the renewal
of this license.
Original Pancake House ft Pie - 3501 W. 70th St.
This restaurant has undergone a change in ownership from
Webb Edina, Inc., to Great Food, Inc., a corporation owned
entirely by William Max McGee of Deephaven, MN. The
investigation of this application revealed no reasons to object to
the issuance of this license.
CHIEF OF POLICE
WCB:nah
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
FROM: ELLIOTT MARSTON, ASSISTANT SANITARIAN
SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION - GREAT FOOD, INC.
DBA /ORIGINAL PANCAKE HOUSE /MY PIE
DATE: MARCH 17, 1994
The application for an on -sale wine license submitted by Great Food, Inc., new
owners of Original Pancake House /My Pie at 3501 West 70th Street, has been
reviewed by the Health Department.
Our investigation of the premises finds that the restaurant will comply with
the requirements of Code Section 900 with respect to seating capacity, food
establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space which
will not be adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine.
I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved.
ri
a_h /
N
O
REi- ORTIREC OMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: MARCH 21, 1994
Subject:
ION SALE WINE LICENSE
;RENEWAL MICK'S - SOUTHDALE
Agenda Item #. v - D
Consent (71
Information Only. "
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
INFO/BACKGROUND
IT I To Council
Action
_C
X
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
On March 7, 1994, the City Council considered the wine license renewal for Mick's
Southdale. Based upon the staff recommendation, the City Council delayed consideration
of the renewal until the March 21,1994, meeting. This continuance was recommended by
the staff as a result of the pre - renewal inspection that was conducted by the Police
Department.
On March 14, 1994, Chief Bernhjelm and I met with representatives of Mick's Southdale.
As a result of that meeting, Mick's has submitted the attached letter from Joseph F. Gainor,
its General Manager. This letter outlines the plan which Mick's will implement to ensure
compliance with the requirements of the Edina City Code.
In our opinion, Mick's Southdale has demonstrated a willingness to improve their
organization's _compliance with the requirements of their wine license. We believe the plan
outlined in their letter represents a reasonable approach to improving their situation.
Therefore, we would recommend renewal of their wine license, subject to the following
conditions:
1) Implementation by Mick's of the in -house training and inspection program as outlined
in their letter
1
i
Report/Recommendation - Wine License Renewal/Mick's Southdale
March 21, 1994
Page two
2) An increase in the number of City inspections during the license term. Normally the
City conducts three inspections during the license term. In this case, we recommend
that six inspections be conducted. The cost of these additional inspections must be
borne by Mick's.
3) Any violations which are discovered during the license term will be presented to the
City Council for the purpose of considering the revocation, suspension or other
sanctions with respect to Mick's license.
Enclosure
03/17/94 20:44 $
3
Mick's at Southdale Center,
1127 Southdale Center
Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612) 920 -1622
March 18, 1994
The Honorable Mayor Frederick S. Richards
and City Councilmembers
City of Edina
c/o City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: !lick's at Sou
Inc.
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers:
I am Writing as general manager of Mick's at Southdale to
address problems that havel,come to light in connection with Mick's
at Southdale's service of 1wine and beer. I am aware that one of
our licensed managers, who lis a shift supervisor and who was acting
as a server, served wine to the 17 year old daughter of an Edina
police officer without asking for identification. My understanding
is that the young woman; in connection with the pre- renewal
inspection being conducted; by her father, ordered the wine at the
request of her father while sitting at a table with her father and
other family members.
We at Mick's are extremely concerned about this serious breach
of state law and city ordinance. I have already reemphasized to my
staff the extreme importance of requiring identification of anyone
who might be underage. Staff is requiring identification of anyone
who looks 30 years old or� younger. We also post on the bulletin
board which lists our daily specials the date of birth of the
youngest individual lawfully permitted to drink alcoholic beverages
on that day.
1.1 , .11T"'j1T'fh
16002
03/17/94 20:44 '8' 1&003
The Honorable Mayor Frederick S. Richards
and City Councilmembers
March 18, 1994
Page 2
I was recently informed by an Edina police officer that, in
response to customer inquiries, a member or members of Mick's wait
staff demonstrated a poor attitude about compliance with the
requirement that patrons order a meal (defined as an entree or an
sandwich) before they can be served wine or beer. Specifically, I
understand that members of our wait staff have given advice to
patrons about how to evade -the requirements, in one case advising
a City of Edina official that they could order wine if they had
some bread or breadsticks.
We apologize for this breach of Edina's ordinance. I - have
reemphasized to my staff that wine and beer may be served only
after the patron has ordered a meal. We have been well aware of
this requirement from the time we first applied for our wine and
beer licenses. We understand the reason for requiring that the
patron have a meal with wine or beer, and we will take the steps
outlined in this letter to reeducate our staff to insure a positive
attitude about, and future compliance with, the meal requirement.
The remainder of this'letter outlines the steps we propose to
take to reeducate our existing staff and to educate newly -hired
staff members.
1. Training Sessions for Existing Staff. We will require
each member of our existing wait staff and licensed managers,
myself included, to attend a training session during the month of
April of 1994 about state laws, Edina ordinances, and how to comply
with them. We will specifically include in the training an item by
item review of which items on Mick's menus qualify as meals,. as
defined in Edina's ordinance. Fred Burstein 6 Associates, P.A.,
Mick's local counsel, also happens to be the City Attorney for the
City of Circle Pines. Eric Olsen of that office, who is
responsible for prosecution of gross misdemeanor and misdemeanor
violations of intoxicating liquor laws and ordinances in Circle
Pines, will lead the training session. Each member will be
provided with copies of Edina's wine and license ordinances prior
to the training session, and will be required to review them. The
training session will also include the screening of an
instructional video regarding the service of alcoholic beverages we
will obtain from the Minnesota Restaurant Association. We would
like to invite a member of the Edina Police Department to
participate at our expense in the training sessions. We want to
develop an attitude of cooperation with the police department and
our staff members.
2. New Staff Training. Each new member of Hick's wait staff
will be required to review Edina's wine and license ordinances
r 03/17/94 20:45 a
The Honorable Mayor Frederick S. Richards
and City Councilmembers
March 18, 1994
Page 3
prior to their first day with Mick's. Before going on duty, each
new staff member will view the Minnesota Restaurant Association
video and -will attend a training session conducted by me or another
licensed manager to review the requirements of state law and Edina
ordinances. The training will also include an item by item review
of which menu items qualify as a meal.
3. Ongoing Training. Mick's periodically has "undercover
customers" visit its various locations. The staff of the location
is unaware of the visits by these in -house investigators, which
occur on a monthly basis. After each visit, the investigator
issues a written report, which is sent to Mick's Atlanta
headquarters, and to the general manager of the restaurant. I will
instruct Mick's headquarters to require the investigators who visit
Mick's at Southdale to test us regarding wine and beer license
compliance issues, and to include their findings in their written
reports.
We will welcome any city council or staff suggestions to
enhance our training programs. Hick's, which is expanding
nationwide, is a first -class organization. A guiding principle
which emanates from Hick's Atlanta headquarters is that strict
compliance with the law is a necessary element of maintaining
Mick's reputation. We will do all we can to practice good
citizenship in the City of Edina.
I look forward to attending the city council meeting on March
21. Please feel free to contact me at the restaurant at 920 -1622
with any questions or comments prior to the meeting.
Very truly yours,
cc: Stephan Mygren, President
MICR' S AT CENTER, INC.
J seph F. Gainor, General Manager
10004
e
Cn
g �°
\ ~�RePe�ibv •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: MARCH 17, 1994
Subject: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE
RENEWALS
Agenda Item # V.D
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approval of on -sale wine license renewals for the following restaurants:
Rossini's Restaurant
Original Pancake House /My Pie
Info /Background:
Attached is a report from Chief Bernhjelm for the above on -sale wine license
renewals. Applications have also been submitted from these restaurants for
Manager's licenses.
CITY OF EDINA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 16, 1994
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
City Council
FROM: William Bernhjelm, Chief of Police
Sgt. S.A. Schwartz, Jr.
SUBJECT: Wine License Renewals
Renewal applications for the following establishments have been received:
Rossini's Restaurant - 7373 France Ave. S.
No information is available which would preclude the renewal
of this license.
Original Pancake House ft Pie - 3501 W. 70th St.
This restaurant has undergone a change in ownership from
Webb Edina, Inc., to Great Food, Inc., a corporation owned
entirely by William Max McGee of Deephaven, MN. The
investigation of this application revealed no reasons to object to
the issuance of this license.
CHIEF OF POLICE
WCB:nah
0
o e
Agenda Item # V • E
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
lass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item # V • E
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: MARCH 17, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS
xI
To Council
Action
71
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
U
Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approval of issuance of 3.2 Beer Licenses as listed.
Info /Background
Pursuant to City Code Section 900, beer licenses require approval by the Council
before they can be issued. The following applications for renewal have been
approved by the Police and Health Departments and are submitted for Council
consideration:
On -Sale 3.2 Beer Licenses
Braemar Golf Course
Braemar Golf Dome
Ciatti's Italian Restaurant
Correlli's Pizza & Pasta
Daytons Food Service
Empress Restaurant
Good Earth Restaurant
Two -Guys from Italy
Hawthorn Suites Hotel
. Off -Sale 3.2 Beer Licenses
Country Store
Edina Superette
Holiday Stations, Inc.
Original Pancake House
Pantry Restaurant
Pizzeria Uno
Q.Cumbers
Rossini's '
Ruby Tuesday
Szechuan Star Restaurant
T J's Family Restaurant
The Lotus III
Tour Cafe
JJerry's Foods
JKenny's Market
J SuperAmerica
w
c!
o Le
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
V . E .
From:
Consent
❑
WILLIAM BERNHJELM
POLICE CHIEF
Information Only
❑
Date:
03/18/94
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
RENEWAL OF 3.2 BEER
x
To Council
LICENSE.
AMERICAN LEGION
Action
ix 1
Motion
�
7070 AMUNDSON AVENUE
F7
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
COUNCIL ACT TO NOT RENEW THE LICENSE OF THE LEGION. A HEARING TO REVOKE/
NOT RENEW THE LICENSE WOULD NEED TO BE SCHEDULED.
Info /Background
SEE ATTACHED MEMO
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
City Council
FROM: William Bernhjelm, Chief of Police
DATE: March 18, 1994
SUBJECT: 3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWAL
AMERICAN LEGION
7070 AMUNDSON AVENUE
The Edina Legion has applied for renewal of their 3.2 On -Sale Beer License. The staff
recommends non - renewal of the license for the following reasons:
* In August of 1993, information was received that the Legion may be serving
intoxicating liquor at their establishment. A warning letter was mailed to the
Legion advising them of the consequences of that activity.
* In January of 1994, information was received by Prosecuting Attorney
Dave McGee from a private attorney who was conducting an investigation
relating to a potential civil claim. Two sales of intoxicating liquor were made
by the Legion to investigators employed by this private attorney. McGee
forwarded the information to the Edina Police Department.
* The Police Department forwarded this information to the Minnesota Liquor
Control Commission who assigned investigators. Two undercover purchases
of intoxicating liquor were made by these investigators.
* Liquor Control investigators requested that the Police Department prepare
a search warrant for this location. This warrant was served on
February 23, 1994. At that time, numerous containers of intoxicating liquor
were observed in and around a bar area. Cash and records were also
observed and seized. All of the evidence supports the conclusion that the
Legion was in the business of serving on -sale intoxicating liquor at a bar in
violation of State law and Edina ordinances.
* On March 17, 1994, I was advised by the Assistant Commissioner for Liquor
Control that they were beginning revocation proceedings against the 3.2
license that the Legion holds. The proposed revocation would begin on
l
MEMORANDUM
RE: 3.2 Beer License Renewal
American Legion
7070 Amundson Avenue
April 17, 1994. The Legion can file for appeal of the revocation up to ten
(10) days prior to the effective date.
On March 17, 1994, Chief Bernhjehn advised Mr. Joseph Schaper of the
Legion that the staff recommendation would be to oppose the renewal of the
3.2 license. He was told also of the pending action by the State. He was told
that the Legion's options would include withdrawing the application and /or
appearing at the Council Meeting on March 21, 1994 to request a hearing on
the proposed non - renewal. Mr. Schaper said that he would contact the
Legion's attorney and inform him of the situation. As of this time, staff has
not been advised of the Legion's intentions.
Mr. Gilligan, City Attorney, has advised that if the Council wished to proceed
with the recommended non - renewal, a hearing would need to be
scheduled.
4i9��r'1r
A.
o e
�fv s=ue a0
\N .des 't
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
21 March, 1994
Date:
Tax Forfeit
Subject: parcel - Outlot A
Indian Hills West
Recommendation:
Agenda Item w V • F
Consent
x
Information Only
L
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
x ! To Council
Action
Motion
x Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Authorize a resolution requesting conveyance of Outlot A, Indian
Hills West to the City for stormwater ponding'purposes.
Info /Background:
Outlot A, Indian Hills West, is a tax forfeit parcel located on
the attached map. Staff has reviewed this parcel and it is a
stormwater detention pond as well as part of the development of
the Indian Hills West Addition. This pond serves as a stormwater
holding area._ As such, staff would recommend a resolution
requesting .conveyance of this property to the City for stormwater
ponding purposes.
32
6c
°INDIAN MILL• 71. 1518
- �ARROWHEAO 1. rJ °•f \i:a +dr I 1
.z94 a� t • I I 2ND •'o wi Js9.4 eF` r \�
b, 08
9t.o. s ' 2 Ann INDIAN76:4"Al 'J#
(�41 e4 24 + —
' 0864 �y.;• .�'�" 6J 'M , � �0 2 �a v i
y2 Y77. ♦ �1 oar / t
ji4 •� S! .{� / 1 �w•^p ?.'wl�'o _ '� '�Yd9'Oiq r _o �� 1
5 �•• `
4[y4 *li, �� N rss v 3 _ °; 'L2a A� �p.o yy ! i7g• ' =IUI �•l7)T z
'INDIAN N� h v, oP 9J4` =�.1 I04 ils,7 0,
!WAY, W. •`I. w O.L.A�► (4�4 $• .5 5i j' :LY °' IYB °e a 5. N 1310E
v ` ,�°"� 1 1
r- v* • . ,Se RD z�b J,,s4 �s fs�; p} _ T4,.� 2
V SdM 4 W I` '!d!!� ti.• . °�:1 TAM oA �.r .. • r� ?�
AM (444
V ,J dfli•194j ' � J � ) �m
•09.94 �osJ - 5 0 7 v �+►,� 2 14�p IJJo l �••;I1 l J ••" . � r• 2. 75 � 19.94 _ �S' W \a f. 5 ae dB 1c O b` c i4 ' i- •, 6 .. (a) It
�APACHE °ROAO o; i9j so APACHE 0 Is — I 9 w�� 'n!��z!► (�3iZy 10 :5! ia4 . 11 . �• `i >*� 11)0
cl :ait . �^LL ti r 4 Q
GC2 VO t Iv •� I ol.. 3 : Si'4 ti�rd,l •� •°- e: � �. ya4• /!'U -W
. X9.81 i,r.oa ifasL r i *.
r � E�lt 1I�+ a •:•7. _ 551 w ° 1d5,y
k7 5 °)�Z aIi0
) � I E R`-- .v �)^
WEST We, TR -�•J vo ° r N
• • ` \ Ia i . \ O °° . o- w ' >(_ ��_ ! c ) T ' t ' a ° mo P I � o eI o - � m �I�V � � _ I �►' I � I (4'^3i � • I� I/' T.Lf i 1 ' _ �!F " _ \ �� r7 i J �/L�d j ,`SI 7 K` J ' \ �C) �.A' 3 O A .!•) uC S oI, t , . °{1 i , ! i�: '•� 4o • • • _ a � . W - !' 4 g• wam ' f ! ~e r.4;W "� 41 1 . l ; :' e1C . Ti I/ l blj � `
° "I 4 _ j (il)z i +0 41
(44
j dd•1`=d T\ .Ld
Its rtot. 'e7o� L
(47)17;
R .- 4 i 40 N_ s
SAMUEL
RD
` ld
'74
i N
L44 .0 _ Sb� � c• ,I \�� `'����., r �`�� �I � 4Y °!! �cfl E e -� (�) - j • ..:. ��).
0
Q 0 .. ye.. J' [li" Sioux cl,I � ,� •J � er C_•i {
1J02 ".
w L
' "L q
4S; 44
•I '\t l) �f-'/ r' I I// . 1_^ lw �' . `•�.,. \rt l �V
RESOLUTION FOR ACQUISITION OF TAR FORFEIT LAND
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Clerk be
authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision for
Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property
contained in Hennepin County Non - Conservation Classification List 805 -NC, said
property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth:
Outlot A, Indian Hills West ( PID 06- 116 -21 -32 -0074)
Public wetland and flood control purposes.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of March 21, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of March, 1994.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
.1
A.
JFei
A ��
H C
"PIhMN�
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
'Francis Hoffman;��
From: City Engineer- j
Date: 21 March, 1994
Subject;rraffic Signal
Agreement with
Hennepin County for
France Ave. at
W. 54th St. &
W. 58th St.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item - ° - c
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
x
To Council
Action
Motion
'X
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Approve agreements and plans authorizing reconstruction of
traffic signals on France Avenue at W. 54th Street and W. 58th
Street. Authorize resolution for Mayor and Manager to sign
agreement.
Info /Background:
Hennepin County is reconstructing the traffic signals at W. 54th
& France and W. 58th & France. Hennepin County has requested
that we participate in construction of these new signals. The
two agreements specify cost sharing based on the number of
entering legs into the intersection.
At W. 54th & France intersection, the cost split would be 25%
Minneapolis, 25% Edina and 50% Hennepin County. The estimated
Edina share is $20,099.00.
At W. 58th & France intersection, the cost split would be 50%
Edina and 50% Hennepin County. The estimated Edina share is
$40,710.00. These cost splits are the standard Hennepin County
policy for traffic signals.
Report /Recommendation
Agenda Item V.G.
Page Two
Attached are the two signal layouts for the new signals. Each
signal will operate with France Avenue remaining on a green cycle
unless a sidestreet demand is made via a vehicle crossing a loop
detector.
The local funds for our Edina share would be from the capital
improvements fund.
Staff has reviewed the agreements and find the agreements are
consistent with previous Hennepin County agreements. Also, the
plans have been reviewed and are satisfactory to our staff.
As such, staff would recommend authorization of the agreements,
approval of the plans and approval of a resolution authorizing
the Mayor and Manager to sign the agreements.
T - /+T2
HL) 2
SOP-A TO NN -4
NN-4 TO CAC -1
1 1/2' RSC
2 - I /C+6
1 - 1 /C#4
CAC HH
1 4
u II
-
f
�— HH
30 N. P. H.
125
= 2 i
(D2 0® D2
2 1 � - 3
.....................
oll
ZII N -2AC -1
31/2, RSC
4 -12/C#12
7 - 2 /C#12(SHLD)
2 - I /C#10
NN -1 TO NN -3
1 1/2' RSC
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
NN -5 TO NN -3 —
3 1/2' RSC
4 - 12/C*12
5 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - I /C#10
MA -2 TO NN -5
3' RSC
I
i-L 20' 3 201 ,
u h ,
II j, HH D4 ij
I'
I I
u D4
II 2
SOP
„ I
I' I
JA li D4 HH
n 3 7
SA IC
r— - f---
MA o
-- 3 ----
6-)To*
ILI
�
f - I" u
I
D8
2
II 1
II I
a
' D8
,1
II 1 I 1
d I
1
I
I
1
1 I
' 1
I
1 I
I '
I �• 1
' a"
LU
1
I
France Avenue & W. 54th Street
- IL /1.•IL
4 - 2kd- 12(SHLD)
MA -4 TO NN -T
3" RSC IN-9 TO NN -T
2 - 12/C +12 1 1/2" RSC
2 - 2 /C#12(SHLD) 2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
SA f
DI
1
1 ,
I � al
v
I
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SA - -�
A
FRANCE An.
0 o ---
- - - -- _---__ -- __� ___- � -_ -__
I �
-- - -- ;---- - - - - -- - - - - -, ------- - - - - -- -------------- - - - - -- - --
a- -6�b�- 1 - I
� I
1 � -
HH � --
II I
8 II
II I
d
,I 1
d
d
d
d
II
II
d
2{. 0, � I
,I I
II 1
II I
I
o I
I 1
I 1
I 1
1 ,
1
I , I
2 1 ,
1
I I
EL:
� � 1
W -1 TO NN -8
3' RSC
2 - 12/C +12
2 - 2 /C+12(SHLD)
2 - 1 /C #10
NN -8 TO, NN-5
3" RSC
2 - 12/C#12
3 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - 1 /C +10
)2 \1
HH F
MA-4 TO NN -4
HH.•
D
3" RSC
{6
2 - 121C +12
D4
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
1
HN -2 TO NN -4
3" RSC
2 12/C +12
2 -
3 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
MA-3 TO NN -2
_HH
2
3" RSC �
2 - 12/C +12
HH
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD) H_H
B
$MA
`C 3
- - -- �� - -- -. -- - --
35 M. P. H. 4
D2 l_ 3-
- -- - - -
F -- ----------=---- -- -----=--=— �_--- _---- - - - -_—
HH-1 TO NN -3
1 1/2" RSC
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
WA-2 TO NN-3
3" RSC
2 - 12/C+12
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
NH-3 TO NN -0 —
3" RSC
2 - 12/C +12
5 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
HH
3
HH_
C
SA_
B /
France Avenue & W. 58th Street
J 1/L �JV
4 - Co
10 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
rR I i 2 I /C+ 10
i
CAC NN -T TO CAC -1
' I i A SOP -1 TO NN-T
I ;i CAC 1 112" RSC
e 2 - 1 /C +6
i 1 I - I /C+4
D5 1 i D S -. NN -0 TO NN -5
i 1 112" RSC
HH HH 2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
1
a q t I HH 1 HH .
• ,i0� l 8 / H
I . 4) I I \
CA I ttI
•1' J= TLr-r--r ..rr------rrrrr-•--ry -----rri
" 3 j HH SOP, SOP
HH 2
� 5 A I -- - -- -
1 �0, E - - -
D8 NH 5A MA —►
r 2 l C -3 -1' 0 A -- 7 —� 35 M. P. H.
l I ll- 11
D8 1+
NN-6 TO HN-6
3 1/2" RSC
4 - 12/C +12
8 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - I /C +10
MA -1 TO NN -0
3" RSC
2 - 12/C +12
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - I /C +10
__
zI
{6
D8
HH
I
j
D--I ,
t3
-
�.:
9
NN-6 TO HN-6
3 1/2" RSC
4 - 12/C +12
8 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - I /C +10
MA -1 TO NN -0
3" RSC
2 - 12/C +12
2 - 2 /C +12(SHLD)
2 - I /C +10
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 9008 AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND MANAGER
TO SIGN AGREEMENT NO. PW 36 -11 -92 THEREFOR
WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 9008 for reconstruction of the
traffic control signal system at the intersection of West 58th Street with
County State Aid Highway No. 17 (France Avenue) have been prepared and
presented to the City Council of Edina, Minnesota;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said plans for Hennepin County Project
No. 9008 be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and
directed to execute Agreement No. PW 36- 11 -92, by and between the County of
Hennepin and the City of Edina, for participation in the reconstruction and
operation of said traffic control signal system.
Mayor Pro -Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of March 21, 1994 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of March, 1994.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 9009 AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND MANAGER
TO SIGN AGREEMENT NO. PW 37 -11 -92 THEREFOR
WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 9009 for reconstruction of the
traffic control signal system at the intersection of West 54th Street with
County State Aid Highway No. 17 (France Avenue) have been prepared and
presented to the City Council of Edina, Minnesota;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said plans for Hennepin County Project
No. 9009 be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor Pro -Tem and Manager are hereby
authorized and directed to execute Agreement No. PW 37- 11 -92, by and between
the County of Hennepin, the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina, for
participation in the reconstruction and operation of said traffic control
signal system.
Mayor Pro -Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of March 21, 1994 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of March, 1994.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
1�
r4k
4 A` \
0 7M
?1 p
To:
From:
REPORTIRECOMMENDATION
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman,
City Engineer '�iV
Date: 21 March, 1994
Subject: Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District
Wetland Conservation
Act Update - LGU
Authority
Recommendation:
Agenda Item .—,F. V - H-
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
Adopt a resolution that the City of Edina will act as the local
governmental unit for implementation of permanent rules of the
1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed portion of Edina.
Info /Background:
The Nine Mile Watershed District has been reviewing the new
permanent rules for the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA).
Their current position is that they are unable to financially
manage all the requirements of the Act. As such, after
conversation with staff at the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water
Resources, City staff is recommending that the City of Edina act
as the responsible Local Government Unit (LGU) for the WCA. The
City would take on the LGU responsibilities for only the Nine
Mile Creek portion in the City of Edina. The Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District would remain the LGU for the Minnehaha portion
of Edina.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District would like'to establish a
joint powers agreement with the City to work with the City on
implementing the Wetland Act and Rules.
To HRA
E
To Council
!
Motion
Resoiution
Ordinance
J
Discussion
Adopt a resolution that the City of Edina will act as the local
governmental unit for implementation of permanent rules of the
1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed portion of Edina.
Info /Background:
The Nine Mile Watershed District has been reviewing the new
permanent rules for the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA).
Their current position is that they are unable to financially
manage all the requirements of the Act. As such, after
conversation with staff at the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water
Resources, City staff is recommending that the City of Edina act
as the responsible Local Government Unit (LGU) for the WCA. The
City would take on the LGU responsibilities for only the Nine
Mile Creek portion in the City of Edina. The Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District would remain the LGU for the Minnehaha portion
of Edina.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District would like'to establish a
joint powers agreement with the City to work with the City on
implementing the Wetland Act and Rules.
r
Report /Recommendation
Agenda Item V.H.
Page Two
Staff has attached a map showing the general boundaries of the
Nine Mile Creek Watershed in Edina and several exhibits depicting
flow charts, sample of a wetland act process, state seamless
coverage scenario for the Act, and administrative funding options
for the LGU's. This is understandably a complex process and
staff will try to -cover this in a summary fashion at the City
Council meeting.
Staff has conferred with both the engineer and Board Chairperson
for Nine Mile Creek District and both concur with the recommended
action.
The City of Edina can rescind this action upon approval of a new
joint powers agreement with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Dis-
trict and report same to the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water
Resources at the appropriate time.
r
�� -_ - - - � % -_c, = �- _=r��"n ._ —_ � __ "yam— '• - _ _ . 'i� =r'
C �cl�• � 1 1— �— Tom- _ .Y.e Y.w 11e6 �yt S' _
maim
_V
1`� YYC ar J.,_
�..
IJ
EEL
w...we
—..per L y' -, _ --..- _ ' �..I S!• ,!
rl
43HS83iVM it
i' TO �' E _ - ` ' >13380 TIM 3NIN
Rt �_
Iff
PF
Yarn.: .. • I ., ,,., r � � .. — _. 1� � _ ..._ s
000__
TMJi
ti
EXHIBIT 1
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991
Administrative Funding Options For LGUs
1) Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991: M.S. 103G.2242. subdivision 5.
The local government unit (LGU) may charge a processing fee of up to $75.00.
2) Local Water Planning: M.S. 10313.331, Subdivision 3, item 3.
A county may charge users for services provided by the county necessary to implement
the comprehensive water plan. This fee would only be appropriate if the county's
comprehensive local water plan has included, or has been amended to include, wetland
protection as an implementation item.
3) SWCDs: M.S. 103C.331, Subdivision 14.
As a condition for extending benefits for the performance of work upon lands not owned
or administered by a state agency or the district, the supervisors may require compensation
or contributions in money, services, materials, or otherwise, commensurate with the cost
or reasonable value of the operations or work conferring the benefits.
4) Watershed Districts: M.S. 103D.345. Subdivisions 1 and 2.
Subdivision 1. Application fee. A person applying for a permit required by the
managers under a rule controlling the use and development of land in the floodplain,
greenbelt, and open space areas of the watershed district must accompany the application
with a permit application fee to defray the cost of recording and processing the
application. The managers may set the fee not to exceed $10.
Subdivision 2. Field inspection fee. The managers may charge, in addition, a field
inspection fee of at least $35. The inspection fee must be used to cover actual costs
related to a field inspection. Inspection costs include investigation of the area affected
by the proposed activity, analysis of the proposed activity, services of a consultant, and
any required subsequent monitoring of the proposed activity. Cost of monitoring an
activity authorized by permit may be charged and collected as necessary after issuance of
the permit.
5) Watershed Management Organizations: M.S. 103B.211. Subdivision 1. item S.
Any agreement ... to jointly or cooperatively manage or plan for the management of surface
water in a watershed... may provide ... for a joint board having ... the power to enter into
contracts for the performance of functions with governmental units or persons.
6a) County Planning. Development and Zoning: M.S. 373.41.
The county may charge a fee to record, file, certify, or provide copies of any instrument,
document, or paper that is required by law to be filed or which may be filed in any
county office. The county may charge fees for service provided by any county office,
official, department, court, or employee. The county board may, after a public hearing,
establish the amounts of fees to be charged for the services, unless a statute has specified
the amount. There must be a reasonable relation between the fee and the cost of
providing the service.
6b) Municipal Planning and Zoning: M.S. 462.353, Subdivision 4.
A municipality may prescribe fees sufficient to defray the costs incurred by it in
reviewing, investigating, and administering an application for an amendment to an official
control ... or an application for a permit or other approval required under an official
control ... Fees as prescribed shall be by ordinance.
BWSR (A 8193)
Wetland Conservation Act EXHIBIT 2
LGU PROCEDURES FORSEAMLESS COVERAGE
The county (or lead Interim/Permanent LGU in the county) should meet with all other potential LGU's within their
respective county to coordinate administration of permanent program. This should be accomplished before Jan. 1,
1994 to avoid a moratorium on wetland drain and fill activities. This coordination meeting should cover the following
topics of discussion:
A. Inform cities and townships (if applicable) of WCA if they are not already aware of the program. Be sure
they are aware of how cities were involved in the statute/rule development and that they should have received
information and correspondence through the League of MN Cities or the MN Association of Townships.
B. Do they wish to retain oversight of the program, or delegate all or parts of the program to the county?
If they wish to retain responsibility, they need to pass a resolution by Jan. 1, 1994 to accept responsibility for
WCA and send a copy to BWSR for documentation. A model adoption resolution will be provided by BWSR.
If they do not want responsibility, they should pass a resolution to delegate authority to the county. This does
NOT require a joint powers agreement. The county board representative will need to sign the resolution
accepting the responsibility. If the county has several of these to deal with they may wish to combine them
into a single resolution which includes all cities opting for county administration.
Cities should be made aware of the responsibilities involved and staff commitments required for training and
implementation of the WCA. Be aware that a city LGU can contract with the county, SWCD or private firm
for administrative and technical services. This can range from full administration of the program by the
county with the city having final sign -off authority, to the city contracting for technical services only. The
SWCD is required to serve as a technical representative to all LGU's in the county. Financial arrangements
will vary. Documentation of agreements between LGUs need not be submitted to BWSR as long as the
resolutions adopting the program are clear about responsibilities so as to satisfy the seamless coverage
mandate.
The bottom line is if cities don't have existing or future capability to administer the administrative and
technical aspects of the WCA they should delegate the program to the county.
C. How will the WCA grant funds be divided between LGU's within the county?
However the county has agreed to according to the grant application submitted on behalf of all LGUs.
Remember, any amount received must be matched 50% cash and 50% in -kind in 1994. As grants will be
different from year to year, financial arrangements should be stated in an annual agreement between the county
and other LGUs. This process will reduce the need to modify adoption resolutions and /or joint powers
agreements in the future as funding arrangements change.
D. What happens if a city refuses to deal with WCA?
The county is only required to put forth its best effort in obtaining seamless coverage. Should a city refuse
to accept the program, or delegate to the county, they are in a moratorium on all projects affecting a drain/fill
of a wetland the prescribed penalty procedures will be initiated by the BWSR. The county's block grant will
not be jeopardized.
BWSR advice to small cities would be to delegate authority to the county. Should they be hesitant in doing so,
perhaps trying it on a trial basis would be an option. Either party can cancel or revise the adoption resolution at any
time and assume authority if they don't like how things are being handled. If the county demonstrates the ability to
fairly administer the program, most small cities will be glad they delegated the program.
The county should also adopt a resolution accepting responsibility before Jan. 1, 1994 to avoid the moratorium. If
the county is delegating authority to a SWCD they will need to complete a joint powers agreement by that date
between the county and the SWCD.
■:wm{w (BWSR/JJ IM12Sl97)
RESOLUTION OF
FOR ADOPTING THE PERMANENT RULES OF THE
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) requires local government
units (LGUs) implement this law by adopting the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Water
and Soil Resources (BWSR) pertaining to wetland draining and filling; and
WHEREAS, the BWSR is requesting LGUs adopting the permanent rules of the WCA to notify them
of the LGU decision regarding adoption; and
WHEREAS, the LGU is responsible for making WCA determinations for landowners; and
< < OPTIONAL > >
WHEREAS, the board of previously assumed responsibilities
of LGU for wetland alterations within under the interim rules; and
< < OPTIONAL > >
WHEREAS, the (delegated LGU) is a technical sub -unit of
government capable of making determinations and developing replacement plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF that it hereby
accepts the responsibility as the LGU for the WCA within the legal boundaries of
as of (date) , within the guidelines as set forth by the WCA and rules.
ADOPTED (date)
ATTEST: BY:
Auditor /Clerk of the Board
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS /SUPERVISORS OF
(LGU) , MINNESOTA
Chairman of the Board
< < OPTIONAL > >
By signature below, LGU accepting delegation accepts responsibility for administration of the WCA in (LGU delegatina authority).
ACCEPT:
Auditor /Clerk of the Board
BY:
Chairman of the Board
Y
Minnesota
State and Federal Jurisdiction over "WATERS"
Public Waters.- Water Basin
Corps /EPA — CWA Section 404 Corps /EPA
CWA Section 404
PCA — CWA Section 401 PCA — CWA
Section 401
DNR (OHWL)* LGU /BWSR
LGU
Non —
LGU /BWSR BWSR WCA
Weiland
WCA WCA
_ Non— Wetlond
Public Waters
Waters of the U.S. Waters of the U.S.
��YETG4NOSJ �/YETLANOSj
Ordinary High Water Level
The OHWL is an elevation delineating the highest water level
that has benn maintained for a sufficient period of time
to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly the point
where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly
aquatic to predominantly terrestrial.
le
Most local government units (LGUS) have adopted stale shoreland
and floodplain zoning requirements into their zoning ordinances
Check with your local zoning office for requirements related
to building sites, sewage treatment, grading and filling and
vegetative removal.
Non —
Wetland
JJ /jj -OOW 6/93
�I
I�
H
ba
H
H
W
Minnesota
State and Federal Jurisdiction over "WATERS"
Public Waters: Water Course
Corps /EPA Corps /EPA - CWA Section 404
CWA Section 404
PCA - CWA PCA - CWA Section 401
Section 401
LGU /BWSR LGU /BWSR Corps
WCA WCA RHA - Section 10
--- I--------- 4-- 4- FLOODPLAIN- 1----- - - - - --
Non -`
Wetland
Waters of the
U.S.
�
�YETG4NOSj
* Ordi f v
The OHWL for refer courses) Is the elevation of the lop
of the bank of the channel.
DNR (OHWL)*
Waters of the Waters of the
U.S. U.S.
I{yETL.4NOSJ Public Waters
�lY01e1c0u7sej
DNR (OHWL)*
� —.,001/
U21L
Most local government units (LGUS) have adopted slate shoreland
and floodplain zoning requirements into their zoning ordinances.
Check with your local zoning office for requirements related
to building sites, sewage treatment. grading and filling and
vegetative removal
ji/11 -DOW --193
Landowncr (LO): any wetland drain
or fill activity
Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Flow Chart
Local government unit (LGU) or SWCD con-
tacted; combined project notification form com-
pleted and mailed to,agencies
The wetland is identified on the DNR
protected waters map
Ae
Wetland does
NOT exist
above the
OHWL; DNR
regulations
apply, WCA
does not apply
Exempt activity
Certification
of exemption
may be is-
sued by
LGU to LO
for specific
site activity
Noticees
may appeal
decision to
BWSR LO prohibited
commencing
LO
proceeds if commences, enforce
wi th activit ment action possible
Welland Act
does not apply
F
IF NO LOSS, project can com-
mence without replacement after
LGU determination
If commenced, en-
=001. forcement action
possible
ioM BWSR/JJ
Y
H
00
H
H
xM,oe W12193 (Bwsttm)
EXHIBIT 5
WCA EXAMPLE: IMPACT >.1 ACRE WAPPEAL
APRIL 1, 1994 Landowner (L.O.) visits LGU office
APRIL 5. 1994 L.O. & LGU staff visit site
APRIL 20, 1994 LGU receives replacement plan application and
tuails to:
1) members of the public who have requested a copy
2) SWCD
3) watershed district or WMO (if any)
4) county board
5) mayors of cities in watershed
6) commissioners of Agriculture & DNR
7) BWSR
8) EQB Monitor for publication
9) Notice of application published in local
newspaper
MAY 25, 1994 LGU makes decision on replacement plan application
MAY 26, 1994 LGU mails decision to:
1) the applicant (registered mail)
-must advise that decision is not effective
for 30 days, and is stayed if appealed.
2) BWSR
3) EQB Monitor
4) same list receiving copies of notice of
application
MAY 27 - JUNE 20, 1994 Applicant pursues local administrative
appeal options
JUNE 25, 1994 • BWSR receives notice of appeal from applicant
and affidavit that notice of appeal has also been
mailed to LGU by applicant
• LGU receives notice and mails copies to all those
receiving copies of the original application
• LGU forwards the official record to BWSR
JUNE 30, 1994 • BWSR gives notice of hearing to parties
-the appellant
-LGU
-those receiving notice of LGU decision
AUG 15, 1994 • BWSR holds hearing and finds:
-LGU's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous
-LGU correctly applied the law to the facts
-LGU made no procedural errors
• Therefore, the BWSR affirms the LGU decision
• Applicants next recourse is to District Court
MOTION BY COUNCIL
Member Smith made a motion that the City of Edina act as the local
government unit (LGU) for implementation of the 1991 Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA) for the portion of the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District located within the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
motion is a true and correct copy of the motion duly passed by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 21, 1994, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of May, 1994.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
r�
o e 71
Cn
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: JOHN WALLIN,
FINANCE' DIRECTOR
i Date: MARCH 21, 1994
Subject:
UPDATES OF PURCHASING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Y -I
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve amendments to the City's Purchasing Policies and
Procedures as specified in the attached memorandum.
Info /Background
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: John Wallin, Finance Director
DATE: March 17,, 1994
SUBJECT: Update Purchase Procedures
I would like to propose some changes in the City's purchasing
procedures. These changes would delete the sales tax exemption
section, increase the written quotation retention from 1 to 10
years, and authorize the City Manager to authorize certain payments
before Council approval, and amend the policy on open purchase
orders.
Sales Tax Exemption
The sales tax exemption was lost during 1992 but has not yet been
taken out of the policies. Section 1.14 entitled "Sales Tax
Exemption" should be deleted from the City's purchasing policies as
well as the related APPENDIX G.
Records Retention
The current policy requires that written quotations be kept for one
year after receipt. The state retention schedule requires
retention of claims and purchase orders for 10 years. I would
propose that the written quotations be attached to the claim when
submitted for payment and as a result be retained for 10 years.
Authorization of Payments
The City's auditors have advised that the City is not in compliance
with State law requiring that the City Council must approve all
payments prior to checks being released. We have discussed this
issue with respect to the issuance of liquor checks on a weekly
basis in order to receive discounts. The 1993 legislature gave the
City Manager the authorization to approve payment of claims which
would be confirmed at a later meeting. I propose that the City's
purchasing policy, section 1.9 "Payment Prior to Council Approval"
be amended as follows:
e. When payment of a claim based on a contract cannot be deferred
without loss to the City by forfeiture of discount privileges
or otherwise, the claim may be paid immediately and confirmed
by the City Council at a later Council meeting. (such earlier
payment does not affect the right of the City or any taxpayer
to challenge the validity of the claim.
I recommend a new section 1.9 g. as follows:
g. The City Manager may approve payment prior to Council approval
if he has determined that it is an appropriate payment a n d
that the City is better served by payment prior to the next
Council meeting.
Open Purchase Orders
The City buys many products on a recurring basis during the year.
Examples include automobile parts, police uniforms, cleaning
supplies and office supplies. We cannot predict accurately the
exact quantity or total cost of such items. However, experience
allows us to approximate the quantities that will be required
during a typical year. Our current purchasing policies require
that if expected annual purchases exceed $15,000, then a formal bid
process must be used. Due to the nature of the products being
purchased, formal bidding becomes very cumbersome and has the
undesirable effect of encouraging employees to split purchase
orders and thereby avoid a competitive process. This of course, is
contrary to the spirit and intent of our process.
In order to improve our process with respect to ongoing purchases,
I recommend the following:
Section 1.10 a (v) should be deleted.
Section 1.10 a(vii) should be amended as follows:
Once the aggregate cost of purchases made under the open
purchase order totals the "not to exceed" amount stated
in the open purchase order, a new open purchase order
must be prepared and used in compliance with this
paragraph.
A new section 1.10 a (ix) should be added as follows:
(ix) At least two written quotations shall be obtained on at
least an annual basis for a representative cross section
of products proposed to be purchased by the way of the
open purchase order. The cross section of products
selected shall be those items comprising the bulk of the
annual expenditures. The open purchase order shall be
awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
A new section 1.10 b (vii) should be added as follows:
(vii)At least two written quotations shall be obtained on at
least an annual basis for a representative cross section
of products proposed to be purchased by the way of the
open purchase order. The cross section of products
selected shall be those items comprising the bulk of the
annual expenditures. The open purchase order shall be
awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar
11 1994
02.06:42
Page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
02/07/94
$22.00
DeMOSS,
JOANNE
SERVICES ADAPTIVE RE
012494
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PROF SERVICES
141315
522.00*
02/0.7/94
$608.44
WITTEK GOLF
SUPPLY
NETTING FOR NORMANDA
41354.
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
141316
$608.44*
02/07/94
$23,900.00
SPALDING
RANGE BALLS
020194
RANGE
RANGE BALLS
141317
$23,900.00*
03/07/94
$902.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1412303
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
-
03/07/94
$739.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489319
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489319
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.40
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489319
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$236.31
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940216
1489350
50TH ST SELLIN•CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489350
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489350
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$15.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489327
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489327
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$678.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489343
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD.tIQU
LI0307,
03/07/94
$2.60
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489343
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $13.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489343
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$698.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489335
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
14.89335
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $13.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489335
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$388.57
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489400
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489400
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LIC307
03/07/94
-$3.89
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489400
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,987.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489384
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$14.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489384
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $39.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489384
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489376
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489376
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$722.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489368
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489368
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-57.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489368
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$66.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1500669
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.33
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1500669
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$701.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489301
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$13.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489301
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.01
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489301
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LIC307
03/07/94
$769.79
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489277
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489277
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$2,357.49
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1459528
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE-
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.70
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489277
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489285
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,888.18
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489285
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $37.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489285
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $45.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489293
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$2,276.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489293
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
L10307
03/07/94
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1489293
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
141318
$14,344.43*
03/07/94
$311.20
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
91923
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994 02:06:42
Page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT-
- VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
------ ------
- - - --- --
03/07/94
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-52.82
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
L119940216
91281
91281
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GO WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$282.15
-$3.11
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
91923
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
=52.06
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
91182
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$8.32
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
91181
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$205.70
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
LI19940216
91182
91179
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GDS MIX
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$2.93
$293.10
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
91179
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$832.30
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
'
91181
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141319
$1,905.21"
03/07/94
-$6.35
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
160406
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$269.25
QUALITY WINE
L119940216
160339
160297
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CST
OF GDS BEE
OF GO LIQU
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$1,736.16
$34.72
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
L119940216
LI19940216
160297
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
.-
$1,310.93
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
LI19940216
160338
160299
YORK
50TH
SELLING
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GO WINE
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$1,360.95
- $13.11
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
160338
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $27.22
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
160299
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$2,723.47
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
L119940216
160298
160298
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI0307 .
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- 454.47
$179.50
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
160405
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS BEE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,892.42
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
LI19940216
160403
160403
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE,
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $18.92
- $51.75
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
158266
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI0307
03/07/94
$634.61
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
160406
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0,307
141320
$9,900.75"
03/07/94
$716.33
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
LI19940215
91180
91183
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD ;WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$6.58
-$7.16
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
91180
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$657.70
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
91183
91921
YORK
50TH
SELLING
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$344.52
-$.26
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
LI19940215
91184
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$25.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
91184
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.45
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
91921
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.55
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
91922
91922
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$55.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
141321
$1,781.05*
03/07/94
$1,394.69
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99447
99448
50TH
YORK
ST SELLIN
SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$197.55
$292.50
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
LI19940215
98810
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$203.20
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99371
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$313.90
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
LI19940215
99449
99365
YORK
50TH
SELLING
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$263.00
$357.65
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99443
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$45.10
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99444
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.22
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
L119940215
99445
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $27.89
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99447
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$61..10
ED PHILLIPS ,& SONS
PHILLIPS& SONS
LI19940215
LI19940215
99445
99451
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GO LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
5765:99
-$7.63
ED
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
LI19940215
99442
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
•
r • T
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994
02:06:42
Page 3
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
$381.27
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99442
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$241.91
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
98802
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$87.40
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99823
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/0.7/94
$524.55
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99453
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$103.75
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99454
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$170.69
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
98816
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$671.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99374
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- $15.32
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99451
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$91.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99450
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.82
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99450
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$146.95
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99452
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$75.00
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99455
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.50
ED PHILLIPS &
SONS
LI19940215
99455
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
141322
$6,333.77*
03/07/94
$1 387.90
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91920
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LID307
03/07/94
1887.19
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91873
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $27.76
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91920
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $17.74
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91873
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $148.55
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
90551
YORK SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT- LI0307
03/07/94
- $15.33
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
90535
YORK SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LID307
03/07/94
$119.80
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
92644
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.40
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
92644
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $2,986.02
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91919
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $59.72
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91919
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,963.86
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91875
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $39.28
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91875
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$2,849.36
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91924
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $56.99
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91924
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$128.79
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91874
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.58
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940215
91874
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
141323
$9,952.57*
03/07/94
$72.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
4807
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$5.40
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
4765
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$676.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940215
4765
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141324
$753.40*
03/07/94
$191.20
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940215
38409
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940215
38408
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$5.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940215
38409
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$48.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940215
38408
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141325
$245.70*
02/11/94
$461.80
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INSURA
LIFE INSURANCE
020994
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
1%1326
$461.80*
02/11/94
$5,185.49
POSTMASTER
ASSESSING MAIL'
021194
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
141327
$5,185.49*
02/11/94
$293,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
021194
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
02/11/94
- $293,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
021194
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
141328
.$.00*
0
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994 02:06:42 ;,.` Pag��,;4
,.
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT --- - - - - -- VENDOR ---------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - .- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT - - -PO NGM,.
-------- - - ---- - - -- - -- - - -- --- - - - - --
02/11/94
$195.50
MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN
HOSPITALIZATION
021194
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
141329
$195.50*
02/14/94
$21,893.94
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE /FICA
021494
GENERAL FD PRO
PAYROLL
PAYABL
141330
$21,893.94*
02/15/94
$29,322.49
PERA
PERA
021194
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
141331
$29,322.49*
02/15/94
$19.62
PERA
PERA
021194
GENERAL FD'PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
141332
$19.62*
03/07/94
$23.03
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
LI19940216
94140
94139
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GDS MIX
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $10.89
$1,089.43
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94139
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.87
EAGLE WINE
L119940216
LI19940216
94138
94140
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CASH
CASH
DISCOUNTS
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$.23
$187.20
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94138
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.63
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94135
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$8.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
LI19940216
94137
94134
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CASH
CASH
DISCOUNTS
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$7.51
$750.90
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94134
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$62.62
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94135
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
$864.10
EAGLE WINE
LI19940216
94137
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141333
$2,947.51*
03/07/94
$37.10
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1628
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
$34.50
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1489
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
$533.10
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1477
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$427.55
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1624
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,159.50
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1661
1478
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD WINE
L10307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$22.35
$270.50
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940216
LI19940216
1623
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$5.41
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1623
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$150.59
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1479
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.01
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1479
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$56.30
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
2272
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$31.50
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
LI19940216
1626
1485
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF GDS MIX
OF GD LIQU
L10307
L10307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$253.30
-$5.07
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940216
1485
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,059.17
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1625
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
L10307
03/07/94
- $21.18
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1625
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,286.95
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
L119940216
1627
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,700.00
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1675
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$944.15
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1630
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$18.15
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS.
LI19940216
1488
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307'.
03/07/94
$945.95
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
1487
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,710.95
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940216
LI19940216
1676
1629
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$257.02
-$5.14
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940216
1629
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
141334
$10,858: "82*
COUNCIL CHECK
REGISTER FOR
HAND CHECKS
Fri Mar 11 1994
02:06:42
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
141335
Page 5
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM.
03/07/94
- $101.72
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
90662
03/07/94
-$4.04
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94950
03/07/94
- $84.65
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
90833
03/0.7/94
$201.98
GRIGGS
COOPER -&
CO.
LI19940216
94950
03/07/94
- $70.28
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94323
03/07/94
-$1.80
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94885
03/07/94
$89.82
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94885
03/07/94
$2,042.40
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94319
03/07/94
-$40.85
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94319
03/07/94
$734.38
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94320
03/07/94
-$14.69
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94320
03/07/94
- $42.79
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94318
03/07/94
$1,551.22
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI199402.16
94321
03/07/94
-$2.20
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
93664
03/07/94
- $31.02
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94321
03/07/94
$2,139.34
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94318
03/07/94
$3,514.02
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
94323
03/07/94
$110.22
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
LI19940216
93664
$9,989.34*
03/07/94
- $23.12
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1496413
03/07/94
$62.30
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1525906
03/07/94
- $14.20
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520386
03/07/94
$19.76
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520386
03/07/94
$1,420.05
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520386
03/07/94
-$6.05
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520444
03/07/94
$11.96
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520444
03/07/94
$605.48
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1520444
03/07/94
-$.62
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1525906
03/07/94
-$4.85
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1496405
03/07/94
-$2.78
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1488444
03/07/94
$13.78
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $54.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$2,486.19
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$13.78
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $49.72
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $2,486.19
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $13.78
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$49.72
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
L119940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $2,445.97
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$2,486.19
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$13.78
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
- $49.72
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518299
03/07/94
$1,089.26
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518281
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518281
03/07/94
- $21.79
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518281
03/07/94
$373.91
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518307
03/07/94
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518307
03/07/94
-$3.74
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518307
03/07/94
$73.48
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518265
03/07/94
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216.
1518265
03/07/94
-$:.73
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518265
03/07/94
$486.88
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940216
1518257
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GO WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GO WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GO LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri
Mar
11 1994
02:06:42
Page 6
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1518257
1518257
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF
DISCOUNTS
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$4.87
$1,592.21
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1518240
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$20.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1518240
1518299
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$2,486.19
- $15.92
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1518240
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520402
1518273
YORK
VERNON
SELLING
SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF
GDS MIX
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$68.22
-$.68
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1518273
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LIC307
03/07/94
$340.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520485
1520485
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GO WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$1.56
-$3.41
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520485
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$91.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1520469
1520469
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$.52
-$.92
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520469
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$368.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520451
1520451
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$7.28
-$3.69
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520451
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,288.81
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1520477
1520477
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$15.60
- $12.89
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520477
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$595.27
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1520501
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LID307
03/07/94
$3.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520501
1520501
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $11.91
$872.36
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520493
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$5.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520493
1520493
50TH
50TH
ST SELLIN
ST SELLIN
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $17.45
$1,282.84
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520428
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520428
1520428
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GO LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $25.66
$1,284.17
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520410
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$8.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520410
1520410
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD LIQU
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $25.68
$15.16
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
1520436
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1520436
1520394
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$568.20
$2.60
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
CO.
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520394
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$5.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
1520394
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$173.73
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940216
LI19940216
1520402
1520402
YORK
YORK
SELLING
SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
141336
$15,018.48"
03/07/94
$5.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19940216
LI19940216
38631
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GDS MIX
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$47.45
$209.60
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940216
.38632
38631
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19940216
«.
38630
38629
50TH
YORK
ST SELLIN
SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD WINE
GDS BEE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$39.45
$68.80
PAUSTIS
PAUSTIS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940216
LI19940216
38630
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
141337
5373.30"
03/07/94
-$.65
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
LI19940216
93749
04417
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$23:25
$1,306.99
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93750
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994
02:06:42
Page 7
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
-S.23
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
04417
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $13.07
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93750
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,101.12
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93751
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$11.01
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119940216
93751
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$753.30
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
94322
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.53
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
94322
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,178.89
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93748
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- $11.79
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93748
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$64.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
93749
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141338
$4,383.77*
03/07/94
$62.88
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162155
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.63
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162155
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$4,236.17
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162391
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$42.36
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162391
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$573.21
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162172
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$11.46
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162172
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$156.45
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162230
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.13
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162230
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,495.43
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162154
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU'-LI0307
03/07/94
$1,972.86
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162396
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$29.91
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162154
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $19.73
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162396
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$2,743.13
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162162
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $54.86
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162162
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$3,704.24
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162393
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- 537.04.
QUALITY WINE
LI19940216
162393
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L -IO307
141339
$14,745.25*
03/07/94
$3.75
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
5077
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$456.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940216
5077
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141340
$459.75*
03/07/94
$80.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19940216
06181
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19940216
06180
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19940216
06181
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$56.00
WINE MERCHANTS
LI19940216
06180
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141341
$138.00*
03/07/94
- $950.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36261
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$9.75
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36261
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
59.75
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36261
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$169.50
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36222
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$950.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36261
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940216
36222
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141342
$172.50*
03/07/94
-$.78
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
94994
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$413.20
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
96171
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$4.13
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
96171
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$263.55
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
96172
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- $2'.64
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
96172
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$840.95
EAGLE WINE
LI19940223
96173
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994 02:06:42 Page 8
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT _ VENDOR---------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM PO NUM.
-- OBJECT --- - - - -
141343
141344
03/07/94
03/07/94
-48.41
$77.94
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
COOPER
LI19940223
LI19940223
96173
94994
03/07/94
03/07/94
$96.00
-$.96
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
03/07/94
03/07/94
LI19940223
LI19940223
96174
96174
COOPER
COOPER
$1,674.72*
CO.
CO.
LI19940223
LI19940223
90894
96667
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
03/07/94
03/07/94
$474.80
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3953
03/07/94
$20.25
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3453
03/07/94
$802.80
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3452
03/07/94
$490.85
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3767
03/07/94
$1,129.20
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3451
3949
03/07/94
$451.50
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
LI19940223
LI19940223
03/07/94
$32.75
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3952
03/07/94
$44.65
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3595
03/07/94
$55.09
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3757
03/07/94
$691.40
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3765
4674
03/07/94
03/07/94
$61.80
$70.00
ED
ED
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940223
LI19940223
3755
03/07/94
$448.80
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3940
03/07/94
$225.75
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3756
03/07/94
03/07/94
$669.70
$368.83
ED
ED
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
& SONS
& SONS
LI19940223
LI19940223
3449
3590
03/07/94
-$7.38
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3590
03/07/94
$704.54
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3596
03/07/94
- 814.09
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3596
03/07/94
$174.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3764
03/07/94
-$1.10
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3757
03/07/94
-$3.48
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3764
03/07/94
- $49.50
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
148129
03/07/94
$51.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3766
03/07/94
-$1.02
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3766
03/07/94
$495.40
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3597
03/07/94
-$9.91
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
3597
03/07/94
- $76.00
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
148134
03/07/94
$1,325.70
ED
PHILLIPS
& SONS
LI19940223
1486
$8,626.33*
YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS LI0307
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE LI0307
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX LI0307
YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS LI0307
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
03/07/94
$452.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
96667
VERNON SELLING
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $19.29
-$9.04
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
LI19940223
LI19940223
90894
96667
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
03/07/94
$2,006.39
- $40.13
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
LI19940223
LI19940223
96668
96668
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
03/07/94
03/07/94
$368.45
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
96669
50TH ST SELLIN
03/07/94
-$7.37
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
96669
50TH ST SELLIN
03/07/94
$1,530.94
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
96670
50TH ST SELLIN
03/07/94
-$30.62
$718.97
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
LI19940223
LI19940223
96670
k 96671
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $14.38
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
96671
YORK SELLING
03/07/94
03/07/94
$2,055.46
- $41.11
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
LI19940223
LI19940223
96672
96672
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
03/07/94
- $12.09
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
LI19940223
90893
YORK SELLING
141345
$6,958"18*
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD LIQU
CST OF GO WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS BEE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD WINE
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
CST OF GD LIQU
CASH DISCOUNTS
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LID307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar
11 1994
02:06:42
Page .9
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
$186.76
IMPERIAL CROWN IMPORTI
LI19940223
2603
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141346
$186.76'
03/07/94
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546761
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546761
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$644.35
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546753
VERNON SELLING_CST
OF GD WINE
LIG307
03/07/94
$138.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546761
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$13.00
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546753
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$321.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546837
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$6.44
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546753
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$398.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546779
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546779
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546779
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$914.54
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546787
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546787
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $18.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546787
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,072.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546795
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546795
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GO LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $21.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546795
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307,
03/07/94
$878.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546852
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
$17.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546852
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
-$8.79
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546852
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$1,241.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546878
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546878
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$24.82
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546878
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$985.67
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546860
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$10.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546860
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$9.86
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546860
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LID307
03/07/94
$2,691.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546886
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$16.38
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546886
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
L10307
03/07/94
- $53.83
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546886
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$78.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1538305
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
-$.78
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1538305
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$251.47
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1558659
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$5.72
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1558659
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.51
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1558659
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$221.33
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546811
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$2.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546811
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546811
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$410.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546829
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546829
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$4.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546829
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.21
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546837
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$468.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1558642
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.12
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1558642
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$9.36
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1558642
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1.04
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940223
1546837
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$648.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546845
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.22
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
17517
YORK
SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
L10307
03/07/94
$4.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546845
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $12.97
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1546845
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
- $45:98
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
18424
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI0307
03/07/94
- $77.46
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940223
1501303
50TH
ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
LI0307
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994 02:06:42
Page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
- - - - - -- ---
VENDOR
- - - - -- ---------- - - -
DESCRIPTION
- -- - - - -- -- - - - -
INVOICE
-- -
PROGRAM
- - - -- --------------------------
OBJECT
PO NUM.
-
- - --- - ----
141347
- - - --
-
$11,160.22"
03/07/94
$68.80
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940223
LI19940223
38779
38781
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD
GD
WINE
WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$4.00
$3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940223
38779
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$103.20
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940223
LI19940223
38780
38780
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD
GD
WINE
WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$3.00
$192.80
PAUSTIS & SONS
PAUSTIS & SONS
LI19940223
38781
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GO
WINE
LI0307
141348
$374.80"
03/07/94
- $10.37
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
96104
96104
VERNON SELLING
VERNON.SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,037.41
$181.17
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
L119940223
LI19940223
96105
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$4.58
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
96106
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.81
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
96105
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$457.66
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
96106
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
141349
$1,659.48"
03/07/94
- $35.33
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
163875
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307 .
03/07/94
$2,148.86
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
LI19940223
163976
163976
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF
DISCOUNTS
GD LIQU
LI0307
LI0307-
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $42.98
$1,446.16
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164020
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$28.92
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164020
164236
50TH ST SELLIN
VERNON SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF
GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$935.34
-$9.35
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
LI19940223
164236
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$1,471.95
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164238
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- $14.72
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164238
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
OF
GD LIQU
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,766.45
QUALITY WINE
WINE
LI19940223
LI19940223
163875
164263
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$1,467.74
-$1.52
QUALITY
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164576
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $14.68
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164263
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$152.00
QUALITY WINE
LI19940223
164576
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
141350
$9,241.00"
03/07/94
$3.75
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
5076
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$750.00
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
5292
YORK SELLING
CST
OF.GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$8.10
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
5292
5076
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD
GD
WINE
WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$299.00
$232.00
THE WINE COMPANY
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
LI19940223
5321
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$2.50
THE WINE COMPANY
LI19940223
5321
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
141351
$1,295.35*
03/07/94
$950.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940223
36261
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
GD
WINE
WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$9.75
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WINES INC
LI19940223
LI19940223
36261
15298
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$184.00
$141.00
WORLD CLASS
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940223
15297
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LI0307
141352
$1,284.75"
02/25/94
$247,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PAYROLL TRANSFER
022594
022594
LIQUOR PROG
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
CASH
02/25/94
- $247,000.00
CITY OF
141353
$..00"
02/25/94
$22,986.33
PERA
PERA
022594
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar
11 1994
02:06:42
Page 11
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM,
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
141354
$22,986.33*
02/25/94
$19.62
PERA
PERA
022594
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
141355
$19.62*
02/25/94
$21,562.97
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE /FICA
022594
GENERAL FD .PRO
PAYROLL PAYABL
141357
$21,562.97*
02/28/94
$6,612.04
PERA
PERA
022594
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
141358
$6,612.04*
03/07/94
-$1.00
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98703
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$111.57
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98704
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.12
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98704
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$277.53
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98705
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$100.40
EAGLE WINE
L119940302
98703
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$2.78
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98705
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.60
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
99407
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$135.13
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98706
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.35
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98706
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$304.99
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98707
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.05
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98707
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$21.90
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98708
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.22
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
98708
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$60.49
EAGLE WINE
LI19940302
99407
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141359
$1,001.89*
03/07/94
$394.85
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5765
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$242.52
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6016
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$490.65
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5767
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$4.85
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6016
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$316.65
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5697
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$87.00
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6032
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.74
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6032
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$351.80
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5698
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$187.50
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6033
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.75
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6033
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$467.24
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6019
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$9.34
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6019
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$392.35
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5773
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$377.45
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5777
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$463.60
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5772
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$585.35
ED.PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
6020
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$622.25
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5775
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$11.71
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
L119940302
6020
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$580.40
ED PHILLIPS
&
SONS
LI19940302
5699
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LI0307
141360
$5,528.22*
03/07/94
- $18.89
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
L119940302
98880
VERNON SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$944.48
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940302
98880
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,434.21
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940302
98881
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $74:40
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940302
98882
YORK SELLING
CASH DISCOUNTS
LID307
03/07/94
- $28.42
GRIGGS COOPER
& CO.
LI19940302
98881
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH DISCOUNTS
LI0307
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri
Mar 11 1994
02:06:42
Page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT ,
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
$3,787.27
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LI19940302
98882
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LIC307
141361
$6,044.25*
03/07/94
$106.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
L119940302
38981
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19940302
38984
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GDS BEE
LI0307
03/07/94
$3.60
PAUSTIS
& SONS
LI19940302
LI19940302
38981
38984
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF GD WINE
OF GDS BEE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
$24.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
141363
$137.50*
03/07/94
-$9.33
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19940302
98387
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$73.50
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
COMPANY
LI19940302
LI19940302
98390
98387
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF GDS MIX
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$933.24
-$6.31
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
LI19940302
98388
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$630.75
$10.99
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
COMPANY
LI19940302
LI19940302
98388
98389
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-
$1,099.46
-S.74
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
COMPANY
COMPANY
LI19940302
LI19940302
98389
98390
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
141364
$2,709.58*
03/07/94
- $12.76
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
LI19940302
165899
165900
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD LIQU
LI0307' "
LI0307
03/07/94 -
03/07/94
$2,723.38
-854.47
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19940302
165900
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,191.73
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
LI19940302
165901
165901
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $11.92
$9,010.00
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19940302
165902
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$18.02
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
165902
165902
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD WINE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
- $9,010.00
$18.02
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19940302
LI19940302
165902
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$901.00
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
165902
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- 518.02
QUALITY
WINE
L119940302
165902
50TH ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
- $46.33
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
165896
YORK SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.43
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
165936
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$209.60
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
164235
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GDS BEE
L10307
03/07/94
$123.90
QUALITY
WINE
L119940302
LI19940302
165817
165819
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF GDS BEE
OF GDS BEE
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$168.35
$1,433.09
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19940302
165895
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
- $14.33
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
LI19940302
165895
165896
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CASH
CST
DISCOUNTS
OF GD LIQU
L10307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
$2,316.50
$71.37
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
LI19940302
165936
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,275.54
QUALITY
WINE
LI19940302
165899
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141365
$10,255.20*
03/07/94
$66.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940302
15320
50TH ST�SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$94.00
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
LI19940302
15309
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
141366
$160.00*
03/07/94
$432.58
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
L119940302 41
LI19940302
1573922
1573898
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CASH
OF GD WINE
DISCOUNTS
L10307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$.31
$31.34
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940302
1573898
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
L10307
03/07/94
$56.96
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940302
1558543
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $33.47
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
LI19940302
LI19940302
1573914
1573922
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CASH
CASH
DISCOUNTS
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
LI0307
03/07/94
03/07/94
-$4:32
$7.80
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
WINE CO.
LI19940302
1573914
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
FOR HAND
CHECKS Fri Mar
11 1994
02:06:42
Page 13
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/07/94
$1,673.69
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573914
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $21.17
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573906
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573906
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,058.37
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573906
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$9.88
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573922
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573930
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.48
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573930
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$113.64
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573955
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$.52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573955
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.14
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573955
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$523.96
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573948
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573948
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$5.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1573948
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$38.92
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573963
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573963
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$975.06
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573971
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
L10307
03/07/94
$4.68
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1573971
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $19.50
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573971
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,059.26
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573989
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307 .
03/07/94
$47.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573930
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573989
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$1.39
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573880
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
-$21.19
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573989
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94.
$386.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573997
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573997
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$3.87
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1573997
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
L10307
03/07/94
$7.58
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574037
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.08
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574037
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$907.32
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574045
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$6.24
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574045
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LID307
03/07/94
-$18.15
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574045
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$227.62
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574029
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$1.56
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574029
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
L10307
03/07/94
-$2.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574029
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$625.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1574011
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$6.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574011
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$6.25
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574011
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$1,533.11
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574052
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
$7.28
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1574052
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
-$30.66
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574052
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$775.86
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574060
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$17.16
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574060
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.76
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1574060
YORK
SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$30.29
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1586635
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF GO WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1586635
50TH
ST SELLIN
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$4,001.74
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1489392
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
LI0307
03/07/94
- $65.51
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302 ,.
1558543
YORK
SELLING
TRADE
DISCOUNT
LI0307
03/07/94
$719.62
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573864
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
$8.84
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573864
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
-$7.20
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573864
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
03/07/94
$129.80
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1573872
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LI0307
03/07/94
.$:52
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
LI19940302
1573872
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
LID307
03/07/94
-$1.30
JOHNSON
WINE
CO.
L119940302
1573872
VERNON SELLING
CASH
DISCOUNTS
LI0307
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994.
02:06:42
Page 14
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR----------
DESCRIPTION-- - -
- - -- INVOICE - PROGRAM -- OBJECT PO NUM.
- - - -- --------------- --
-------------------------
03/07/94
--- -- -- - - - - -- - --
4138.50 JOHNSON WINE CO.
- - - - --
LI19940302
1573880 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE LI0307
03/07/94
$.52 JOHNSON WINE CO.
LI19940302
1573880 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE LI0307
141367
$15,343.88*
$320,735.95
1
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS Fri Mar 11 1994 02:09:29 Page 1
FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $108,281.80
FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE $24,508.44
FUND # 50 •LIQUOR FUND $187,945.71
$320.735.95
4
J }
1�
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$43.00
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S
RUBBISH REMOVAL
3941425
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOVA
03/21/94
$43.00
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S
RUBBISH REMOVAL
3941424
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH REMOVA
03/21/94
$43.00
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S
RUBBISH REMOVAL
3941423
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOVA
143972
$129.00*
03/21/94
$262.03
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
2344500
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2456
143973
$262.03*
A-
03/21/94
$104.00
ADVANCED ENERGY SERVIC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
005860
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$208.00
ADVANCED ENERGY SERVIC
PROF SERVICES
005861
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
143974-
-
$312.00*
03/21/94
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
COMMUNICATIONS
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$170.71
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
03/21/94
$5.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
FINANCE
EQUIP RENTAL
03/21/94
$10.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
PW BUILDING
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$30.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER RENTAL
030194
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
143975
$225.71*
03/21/94
$67.46
ALBINSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
282708
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3094
143976
$67.46*
03/21/94
$69.23
ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
21968091
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
143977
$69.23*
03/21/94
$705.00
ALPHAGRAPHICS
PRINTING
19894
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
143978
$705.00*
03/21/94
$792.60
ALSTAD, MARIAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
143979
$792.60*
03/21/94
$297.67
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10547
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPP.LI
2937
03/21/94
$198.20
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
19191
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2951
143980
$495.87*
03/21/94
$53.67
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$35.17
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$176.07
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$13.85
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$329.24
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$71.09
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$259.40
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
022894
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$11.36
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
030194
GRILL
LAUNDRY
143981
$949.85*
03/21/94
$2,639.36
AMERIDATA
BILLING COMPUTER
438081
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
2614
143982
$2,639.36*
03/21/94
$1,102.27
ANCHOR PAPER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
78287501
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3183
143983
$1,102.27*
03/21/94
$260.00
ANDERSON, DANIEL
PROF SERVICES
426
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 2
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
143984
$260.00*
03/21/94
$225.34
ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOL
ADA
FEB 1994
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
3097
143985
$225.34"
03/21/94
$63.79
ARROYO TIRE COMPANY
RUBBER TEES
58688
GOLF DOME
RANGE BALLS
143986
$63.79*
03/21/94
$35.95
ARTISTIC FLORAL
FLOWERS
8341
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
143987
$35.95*
03/21/94
$246.14
ASAP MAILING SERVICES
BULK MAILING
02083
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
143988
$246.14*
03/21/94
$197.20
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
REPAIR PARTS
L50173
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$134.57
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
REPAIR PARTS
L50176
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
143989
$331.77*
03/21/94
$31.50
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
67820
CENTENNIAL LAK
CST OF GD FOOD
03/21/94
$134.50
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
67720
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GO FOOD
143990
$166.00*
03/21/94
$51.78
ASTLEFORD INTL
REPAIR PARTS
T6683
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$6.57
ASTLEFORD INTL
REPAIR PARTS
T6739
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2954
143991
$58.35*
03/21/94
$119.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
52089687
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$28.89
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
52087457
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
143992
$147.89*
03/21/94
$14.22
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS
TELEPHONE
022594
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$14.62
AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS
TELEPHONE
022694
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
143993
$28.84*
03/21/94
$14.25
AT &T
TELEPHONE
021894
ED BUILDING &
TELEPHONE
143994
$14.25*
03/21/94
$40.00
ATSSA
TRAFFIC CERTIFICATIO
031494
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
143995
$40.00*
03/21/94
$108.00
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CEN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
21991
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
143996
$108.00*
03/21/94
$31.90
AWD COOLERS OF MINNESO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59948
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI
143997
$31.90*
03/21/94
$44.22
AXT, LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
030994
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD FOOD
143998
$44.22*
03/21/94
$288.36
B & S INDUSTRIES INC
FLARES
10023916
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2633
03/21/94
$134.07
B & S INDUSTRIES INC
(LIGHT) BATTERIES
10023798
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2634
143999
$422.43*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 3
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$20.98
B &K BALLOON DECORATING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6478
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
144000
$20.98*
03/21/94
$580.00
BARNARD ELECTRONICS SE
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
0012730
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR
EQUI
2979
144001
$580.00*
03/21/94
$1,350.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATION
PROF SERVICES
031494
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
.� 144002
$1,350.00*
03/21/94
$389.36
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
296681
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2347
03/21/94
$175.09
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
296774
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2495
03/21/94
$255.39
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
297788
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2587
03/21/94
$218.33
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
294137
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2352
03/21/94
$44.22
BAUER BUILT INC
ACCESSORIES
298940
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2704
03/21/94
$223.42
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
294179
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2346
144003
$1,305.81*
03/21/94
$308.00
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
008031
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2663
144004
$308.00*
03/21/94
$375.00
BECKER ARENA PRODUCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
017328
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3174
144005
$375.00*
03/21/94
$85.00
BELL, BRUCE MENIER
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH
032894
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC
OTHER
144006
$85.00*
03/21/94
$37.50
BENN, BRADLEY
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144007
$37.50*
03/21/94
$100.00
BENNETT, WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144008
$100.00*
03/21/94
$46.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
254438
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT
CLOTHI
144009
$46.50*
03/21/94
$139.30
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
030194/5
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD LIQU
03/21/94
$213.80
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
030194/V
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
03/21/94
$224.30
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
030194/Y
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
144010
$577.40*
03/21/94
$63.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
110193
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
144011
$63.00*
03/21/94
$337.99
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1125070
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3240
03/21/94
$98.25
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1110780
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$58.06
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1155620
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$22.15
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1155620
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$227.47
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1131310
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE
SUPPLIE
03/21/94
$6.77
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1132060
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE
SUPPLIE
3023
144012
$750.69*
03/21/94
$5,105.56
BFI OF MN INC
REFUSE
940200
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
144013
$5,105.56*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 4
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$39,839.29
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING SERVICES
94020070
RECYCLING
EQUIP RENTAL
144014
$39,839.29*
03/21/94
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144015
$100.00*
03/21/94
$129.69
BONGAARTS, VINCENT
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /PO
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
144016
$129.69*
03/21/94
$2,987.23
BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MF
MOTOR REPAIR
372627
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
3068
144017
$2.987_.23*
03/21/94
$43.92
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
29354
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$38.14
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIR PARTS
292453X1
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2818
144018
$82.06*
03/21/94
$262.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
AIR QUALITY TESTING
020626
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
144019
$262.40*
03/21/94
$94.94
BROCK WHITE
REPAIR PARTS
66953301
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2861
144020
$94.94*
03/21/94
$287.55
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13231
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
2866
144021
$287.55*
03/21/94
$58.00
BUIE, BARBARA
POSTAGE
030994
ED ADMINISTRAT
POSTAGE
144022
$58.00*
03/21/94
$98.69
BUIE, BARBARA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
030494
ED ADMINISTRAT
MILEAGE
144023
$98.69*
03/21/94
$150.00
BUIE, ROBERT
CONT ED /POLICE
030894
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
144024
$150.00*
03/21/94
$11.45
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14451010
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$4.58
BUILDERS SQUARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14451010
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
144025
$16.03*
03/21/94
$500.00
BURNS, STEVE
SCORER HIGH SCHOOL G
030394
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
144026
$500.00*
03/21/94
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144027
$100.00*
03/21/94
$34.94
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
160068
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
2921
144028
$34.94*
03/21/94
$55.18
C.E. GOBEIL CO INC
REPAIR PARTS
14046019
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2851
144029
$55.18*
03/21/94
$15.21
CADY COMMUNICATIONS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
97678
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3015
144030
$15.21*
a . I
I
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 5
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$50.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
031594
FINANCE
MILEAGE
144031
$50.00*
03/21/94
$96.09
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
1990
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
.2145
03/21/94
$1,895.99
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
MOBILE RADIO
2359
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
03/21/94
$27.50
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
2528
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
2759
144032
$2,019.58*
03/21/94
$368.73
CARLSON PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59383
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
144033-
-
$368.73*
03/21/94
$109.82
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
338100
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3121
144034
$109.82*
03/21/94
572.96
CDP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1884651
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
144035
$72.96*
03/21/94
$97.76
CELLULAR ONE
TELEPHONE
031094/B
INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$185.27
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE BILL
022894/P
SKATING RINK M
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$13.81
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
022894/P
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$26.59
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
022894/P
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$28.46
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
022894.
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
545.82
CELLULAR ONE
PHONE
022194/P
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
144036
$397.71*
03/21/94
$147.86
CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIE
CRAFT SUPPLIES
18609
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
2922
144037
$147.86*
03/21/94
$137.97
CERTIFIED POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
134106
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$65.74
CERTIFIED POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
122942
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
144038
$203.71*
03/21/94
$315.42
CHATFIELD BRASS BAND M
BAND MUSIC
030794
SPECIAL ACTIVI
MUSIC SUPPLIES
144039
$315.42*
03/21/94
$274.99
CHEM CONCEPTS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
0627
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
3099
144040
$274.99*
03/21/94
$145.76
CHEMSEARCH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
B054478
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
2675
144041
$145.76*
03/21/94
$187.20
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
77581
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$42.50
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
77314
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
144042
$229.70*
03/21/94
$50.00
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18274
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
2413
144043
$50.00*
03/21/94
$12.48
CITY OF RICHFIELD
PROF ENG SERV
022894
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT & POWER
144044
$12.48*
03/21/94
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
53679
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
53680
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$13.50
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI
WINDOW CLEANING
53678
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
144045
$40.50*
03/21/94
$11.90
CLABO, ROBERT
CLOTHING REIMBURSEME
031494
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
03/21/94
$320.15
CLABO, ROBERT
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /PO
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
144046
$332.05*
03/21/94
$182.35
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
743608
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$32.75
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
769736
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$101.30
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
752898
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$92.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
844646
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
144047
$408.40*
03/21/94
$292.88
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE B
CHAIR
8490
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP REPLACEM
3106
03/21/94
$292.88
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE B
CHAIR
8489
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP REPLACEM
3112
144048
$585.76*
03/21/94
$69.35
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPME
REPAIR PARTS
37358
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
2797
03/21/94
$449.50
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPME
COMPRESSOR CONTRACT
37257
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
144049
$518.85*
03/21/94
$30.00
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VERIF
022594/V
VERNON SELLING
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$30.00
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VERIF
022594/5
50TH ST SELLIN
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$30.00
COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MIN
CHECK VERIF
022594/Y
YORK SELLING
SVC CONTR EQUI
144050
$90.00*
03/21/94
$9.98
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
GENDER CHANGER
402851
ENGINEERING GE
PAINT
03/21/94
$5.55
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
GENDER CHANGER
402851
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3171
03/21/94
$43..00
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
SURGE STRIP
402851
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$42.19
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
403949
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$11.00
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
403949
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3184
144051
$111.72*
03/21/94
$192.95
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
517829
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3045
144052
$192.95*
03/21/94
$217.26
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
014661
PATHS & HARD S.PROF
SERVICES
144053
$217.26*
03/21/94
$50.19
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
BLUELINE PAPER
0373621
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3092
03/21/94
$47.69
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
BLUELINE PAPER
0373936
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3169
144054
$97.88*
03/21/94
$33.75
COX, JEFF
TOBACCO PURCHASE INV
030894
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
144055
$33.75*
03/21/94
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J
MEDICAL SERVICES
MARCH 19
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
144056
$1,386
-67*
03/21/94
$64.13
CULLIGAN
WATER
022894
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
144057
$64.13*
t ,
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 7
CHECK NO
=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$307.70
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
LAB SUPPLIES
3116296
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
3034
03/21/94
$67.93
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
Q.A. SAMPLES
3061301
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICES
2574
144058
$375.63*
03/21/94
$82.96
CURTIS 1000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2982508
ART CENTER ADM
OFFICE SUPPLIE
03/21/94
$818.06
CURTIS 1000
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3000608
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3257
144059
$901.02*
�=
03/21/94
$25.85
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
63271
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2978
03/21/94
$3,171.57
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
NEW EQUIPMENT
63277
MAINT OF COURS
VACATION
2915
144060-
-
$3,19.7.42*
03/21/94
$209.00
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2994
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$126.50
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
SEWER SERVICE
3016
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
2754
144061
$335.50*
03/21/94
$31.50
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
377781
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQUI
144062
$31.50*
03/21/94
$5,640.00
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTI
CONTRACT CONSTRUCTIO
9234
GC CIP
CIP
2500
03/21/94
$2,400.00
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTI
DIG OUT SILT
9238
GENERAL STORM
CONTR REPAIRS
3053
03/21/94
$2,075.00
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTI
WATER MAIN REPAIR
9233
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
144063
$10,115.00*
03/21/94
$686.93
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25221
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2963
144064
$686.93*
03/21/94
$98.24
DAY - TIMERS INC,.
DAYTIMER
-14006873
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLIE
144065
$98.24*
03/21/94
$350.70
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
03575
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$46.81
DAYSTARTER
REPAIR PARTS
03577
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
144066
$397.51*
03/21/94
$123.54
DE- SIGN ER
SIGNS & POSTS
026269
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
2702
144067
$123.54*
.03/21/94
$59.50
DICKER, JONAH
PART TIME MAINT ART
031594
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
144068
$59.50*
03/21/94
$1,660.00
DICKER, TOBIE
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144069
$1,660.00*
03/21/94
$40.00
DIE BAVARIAN MUSIKMEIS
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH
040794
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144070
$40.00*
03/21/94
$256.00
DIETRICHSON, BILL
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144071
$256.00*
03/21/94
$28.00
DIRECT IMPRESSIONS
RESERVES GENERAL SUP
.5128
RESERVE PROGRA
GENERAL SUPPLI
144072
$28.00*
03/21/94
$283.94
DISCOM
RADIO SERVICE
456324
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144073
$283.94*
03/21/94
$39.00
DISTINCTIVE LAUNDRY PR
LAUNDRY
021794
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$84.65
DISTINCTIVE LAUNDRY PR
LAUNDRY
021194
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$29.85
DISTINCTIVE LAUNDRY PR
LAUNDRY
022294
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
144074
$153.50*
03/21/94
$399.50
DIVERSIFIED IMPRINTS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
28315
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
144075
$399.50*
03/21/94
$203.50
DONAGHUE DOORS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
09414
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
144076
$203.50*
03/21/94
$89.61
DORNSEIF, DAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
031594
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
144077
$89.61*
03/21/94
$5,593.19
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
354628
LEGAL SERVICES
PRO SVC. - LEGA
144078
$5,593.19*
03/21/94
$19.95
DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
153769
POLICE DEPT. G
CALCIUM CHLORI
144079
$19.95*
03/21/94
$965.00
DYNAMIC LEADERSHIP SER
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
2437
PARK ADMIN.
CONF & SCHOOLS
144080
$965.00*
03/21/94
$154.00
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS FOR PARK EQUIP
131111
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
2738
144081
$154.00*
03/21/94
$48.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 030194
CLUB HOUSE
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$21.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M 333976
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$29.90
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 024396
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,282.10
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 333974
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$3,355.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 334032
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$2,773.65
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 333976
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$794.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 330936
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,409.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 330993
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,610.45
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 330938
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$53.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M 330994
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144082
$11,378.90*
03/21/94
$90.53
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
2636441
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$106.50
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
2636437
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
3180
144083
$197.03*
03/21/94
$281.47
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIALS
43482
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIALS
03/21/94
$577.25
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIALS
43570
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIALS
03/21/94
$1,304.55
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
43312
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
144084
$2,163.27*
03/21/94
$4,233.40
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
% OF HS RECEIPTS
030394
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
144085
$4,233.40*
03/21/94
$484.56
EDINA POLICE EXPLORERS
CAR WASHES
031194
EQUIPMENT OPER
CAR WASH
I
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 9
CHECK NO
=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
144086
$484.56*
03/21/94
$136.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
WORD PERFECT /FIRE DE
031594
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144087
$136.00*
03/21/94
$88.28
EDS /ITP
REFUND DBL PYMT /7617
030294
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
144088
$88.28*
03/21/94
$244.95
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
7599958
PUBLIC HEALTH
EQUIP REPLACEM
03/21/94
$186.38
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
WORDPERF
73,92355
PUBLIC HEALTH
EQUIP REPLACEM
2990
03/21/94
$218.33
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
WORDPERF CS
7400853
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIP REPLACEM
2291
03/21/94
$165.08
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7385952
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
2988
144089
$814.74*
03/21/94
$22.98
EIDEM, KRIS
MEETING EXP /POLICE
031494
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPENS
144090
$22.98*
03/21/94
$277.65
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROD
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
146984
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
7653
144091
$277.65*
03/21/94
$203.41
ENGER, DON
CLOTHING REIMBURSEME
031194
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
144092
$203.41*
03/21/94
$37.50
FARBER, DIANE
PT MAINT ART CENTER
031594
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$158.00
FARBER, DIANE
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$193.00
FARBER, DIANE
PT OFFICE ART CENTER
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144093
$388.50*
03/21/94
$35.38
FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO
ADVERTISING FILM
C14520
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
2926
144094
$35.38*
03/21/94
$192.00
FINE, AGNES
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144095
$192.00*
03/21/94
$1,646.09
FINLEY BROTHERS ENTERP
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
FINAL PY
TENNIS RESUR7A
CIP
144096
$1,646.09*
03/21/94
$384.00
FRAME, SUSAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144097
$384.00*
03/21/94
$21.40
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594/C
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$99.56
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$180.42
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
DISTRIBUTION
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$304.06
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$149.84
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$734.68
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$538.93
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$253.3
1
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022594
PW BUILDING
LAUNDRY
144098
$2,282.20*
03/21/94
$660.00
G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC
SERVICES
031194
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
144099
$660.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$101.00
GANZER DIST INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
177570
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$59.60
GANZER DIST INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
176953
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144100
8160.60*
03/21/94
$300.00
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144101
$300.00*
03/21/94
$78.00
GLEWWE, LINDA
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144102
$78.00*
03/21/94
$292.50
GOPHER STATE 1.CALL
GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
4020226
SUPERV. & OVRH
GOPHER STATE
144103
$292.50*
03/21/94
$230.00
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF
MEMBERSHIP
375474
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
144104
$230.00*
03/21/94
$25.00
GOVERNMENT TRAINING SE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
031194
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOLS
144105
$25.00*
03/21/94
$96.00
GRAPP, JEAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144106
$96.00*
03/21/94
$62.70
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
REPAIR PARTS
50061021
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$62.70
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
50060813
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
144107
$125.40*
03/21/94
$5,007.00
GREUPNER, JOE
LESSONS
031494
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOLF
144108
$5,007.00*
03/21/94
$6,000.00
GREUPNER, JOE
1994 PROFESSIONAL RE
031194
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC - GOLF
144109
$6,000.00*
03/21/94
$16,998.73
GROUP HEALTH INC
HOSPITALIZATION
2015721
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
144110
$16,998.73*
03/21/94
$468.26
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
LUBRICANTS
263406
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
03/21/94
$444.00
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
LUBRICANTS
263298
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
2949
.144111
$912.26*
03/21/94
$124.50
HARMON CONTRACT GLAZIN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3214708
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
3179
144112
$124.50*
03/21/94
$70.61
HARMON GLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
72002150
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3031
144113
$70.61*
03/21/94
$229.41
HARVEST STATES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
022894
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
144114
$229.41*
03/21/94
$75.00
HASSE, ALLEN
PERFORM /EDINBOROUGH
032994
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144115
$75.00*
03/21/94
$192.00
HAYWA, PHYLLIS
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
-144116
$192.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 11
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$134.94
HEDGES, DIANA
CRAFT SUPPLIES
031594
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
144117
$134.94*
03/21/94
$98.09
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
8707
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
3107
144118
$98.09*
03/21/94
$598.90
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICA
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
3161
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
144119
$598.90*
03/21/94
$21.94
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC
FEB 1994
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
144120
$21.94*
03/21/94
$7,645.68
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU
BOARD & ROOM PRISONE
002335
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
144121
$7,645.68*
03/21/94
$121.70
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU
COUNTY CHARGE
#24 EDIN
SPECIAL ASSESS
EQUIP REPLACEM
144122
$121.70*
03/21/94
$13.00
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COL
CONT ED /BAGLEY
041052
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144123
$13.00*
03/21/94
$30.00
HINDS, MARCIA
REFUND SKATING EDINB
030994
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
144124
$30.00*
03/21/94
$100.00
HOFFMAN, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144125
$100.00*
03/21/94
$27.96
HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
62927
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144126
$27.96*
03/21/94
$205.00
HONEYWELL INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
347PT262
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$11,550.00
HONEYWELL INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
899PT904
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$5,502.00
HONEYWELL INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
899PT904
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$5,684.00
HONEYWELL INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
899PT904
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$512.00
HONEYWELL INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
356PT621
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
2934
144127
$23,453.00*
03/21/94
$134.88
HORIZON CHEMICAL CO IN
CHLORINE
40464
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
3108
144128
$134.88*
03/21/94
$35.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
022394
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
2950
03/21/94
$295.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
.020794
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
2707
03/21/94
$125.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
RADIATOR
022894
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
2965
144129
$455.00*
03/21/94
$39,856.00
HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION
NORMANDALE GOLF COUR
030194
NORMANDALE CLU
CIP
144130
$39,856.00*
03/21/94
$284.67
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
METER PARTS
6722
METER REPAIR
REPAIR PARTS
2109
144131
$284.67*
03/21/94
$5,679.30
INTER -CITY PAPER CO
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
060239
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
4333
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994
00:25:30
Page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144132
$5,679.30*
03/21/94
$61.50
INTERIOR COMMUNICATION
EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANC
9064
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
144133
$61.50*
03/21/94
$243.00
INTERNATIONAL CONFEREN
1991 UFC
(DISK)
C77035
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRE PREVENTIO
2742
144134
$243.00*
03/21/94
$76.23
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE
REPAIR PARTS
144329
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2766
03/21/94
$5.53
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE
REPAIR PARTS
146746
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
144135
$81.76*
03/21/94
$166.14
J & F REDDY RENTS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022494
50th LIGHTING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2429
144136
$166.14*
03/21/94
$9,975.75
J PATRICK MOORE LAMAST
DOME ADS
10668
GOLF DOME
ADVERT
OTHER
144137
$9,975.75*
03/21/94
$100.00
JAMES,
WILLIAM F
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144138
$100.00*
03/21/94
$4.01
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$16.44
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$15.96
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$64.62
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$109.99
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$12.93
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$20.65
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$15.34
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$16.08
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$52.40
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$52.36
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$13.57
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$6.57
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$54.88
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$16.39
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$22.75
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$130.16
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
022594
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$83.75
JERRYS
HARDWARE
TOOLS
022594
GENERAL STORM
TOOLS
03/21/94
$3.02
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$63.33
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$35.05
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$7.49
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022594
GUN RANGE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
144140
$817.74*
03/21/94
$382.33
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
D5952
GENERAL(BILLIN
PRINTING
03/21/94
$172.35
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
D6161
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
3308
03/21/94
$145.50
JERRYS
PRINTING
DINNER MEETING
D6274
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
EXPENS
3261
03/21/94
$41.81
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
D4902
PUBLIC HEALTH
PRINTING
144141
$74 "1.99*
03/21/94
$290.45
JIM HATCH SALES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
3304
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2862
144142
$290.45*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 13
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$38.00
JOHNSON, DONALD
REIMBURSEMENT /ENGINE
030494
ENGINEERING GE
CONF &
SCHOOLS
144143
$38.00*
03/21/94
$90.00
JOHNSON, LAURIE
SERVICES /ADAPTIVE RE
030894
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PROF SERVICES
144144
$90.00*
03/21/94
$82.40
JOHNSON, NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
031594
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
03/21/94
$12.60
JOHNSON, NAOMI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
031594
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$20.50
JOHNSON, NAOMI
ART WORK SOLD
031594
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144145-
-
$115.50*
03/21/94
$100.00
JOHNSON, WALTER
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144146
$100.00*
03/21/94
$190.00
JR'S OPTIC INSPECTIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1339
SEWER TREATMEN
CONTR REPAIRS
2681
144147
$190.00*
03/21/94
$46.26
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
58866
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2964
03/21/94
$34.48
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56344
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2693
03/21/94
$4.10
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56519
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
03/21/94
$6.88
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56680
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2794
03/21/94
$19.58
JUSTUS LUMBER
PAINT
55855
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
2600
144148
$111.30*
03/21/94
$64.63
K & K SALES
REPAIR PARTS
78037
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR
PARTS
2870
144149
$64.63*
03/21/94
$590.00
K.C. GROVES TREE EXPER
REMOVAL OF DISEASED
031594
Tree removal 3
CIP
144150
$590.00*
03/21/94
$87.86
KAMAN INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
Z102821
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
2885
03/21/94
$125.08
KAMAN INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
Z102814
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR
PARTS
2880
144151
$212.94*
03/21/94
$218.80
KAR PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
413409
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2902
144152
$218.80*
03/21/94
$75.00
KARAI, JAY
PERFORM /EDINBOROUGH
040594
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC
OTHER
144153
$75.00*
03/21/94
$29.02
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
093405
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3047
03/21/94
$44.71
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
093466
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
3052
03/21/94
$112.99
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
092494
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
03/21/94
$87.18
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
092357
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$24.21
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
092608
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$42.24
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
092555
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
-$9.54
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
093125CM
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$16.98
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
093125
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$26.61
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
093174
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
03/21/94
$27.64
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
092995
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
03/21/94
$8.50
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
092681
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$63.88
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
091027
PW BUILDING
REPAIR
PARTS
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144154
$474.42*
03/21/94
$200.97
KNUTSON, THEODORE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
030394
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
144155
$200.97*
03/21/94
$84.00
KOCHENASH, RICK
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144156
$84.00*
03/21/94
$159.75
KREMER SPRING & ALIGNM
REPAIR PARTS
51555
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2765
03/21/94
$319.50
KREMER SPRING & ALIGNM
REPAIR PARTS
51544
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2706
144157
$479.25*
03/21/94
$21.03
KROHN, HOWARD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
030794
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PROF SERVICES
144158
$21.03*
03/21/94
$425.70
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
101093
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$845.60
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
101506
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$405.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
101602
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,290.50
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
101007
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
144159
$2,966.80*
03/21/94
$25.00
KVASNICK, BARB
PERFORM /EDINBOROUGH
033194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144160
$25.00*
03/21/94
$85.55
LANCELLO, ED
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
031194
STREET REVOLVI
MILEAGE
144161
$85.55*
03/21/94
$113.39
LANCRETE, LAURA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FEB 1994
PARK ADMIN.
MILEAGE
144162
$113.39*
03/21/94
$105.00
LASER QUIPT
SVC CELL PTR
76893
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
03/21/94
$50.00
LASER QUIPT
LASER SVC EB.
76783
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
144163
$155.00*
03/21/94
$307.07
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1005316
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2781
03/21/94
$335.93
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ACCESSORIES
1003320
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2878
03/21/94
$61.08
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1008846
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2873
03/21/94
$427.18
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1005315
EQUIPMENT OPER.
REPAIR PARTS
2781
03/21/94
$145.70
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100649
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2669
03/21/94
$49.44
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1008318
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2874
03/21/94
$112.98
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1008319
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI.2875
03/21/94
$294.18
LAWSON PRODUCTS
SIGNS & POSTS
1000756
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
2372
144164
$1,733.56*
03/21/94
$195.80
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HU
DUES
0018
HUMAN RELATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
3168
144165
$195.80*
03/21/94
$38.04
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
022894/A
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$28.20
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
022894/G
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
144166
$66.24*
03/21/94
$6.92
LIEN INFECTION CONTROL
CLEANING SUPPLIES
2463
GOLF DOME
CLEANING SUPPL
144167
$6.92*
i
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 15
CHECK NO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$335.00
LINDENFELSER & SONS
EX
RUBBISH REMOVAL
34875
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVA
144168
$335.00*
03/21/94
$4,971.61
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSIN
03/21/94
$2,031.23
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSIN
03/21/94
$29.85
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSIN
03/21/94
$1,213.21
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSIN
03/21/94
$29.85
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSIN
03/21/94
$29.85
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0294
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSIN
144169-
-
$8,305.60*
03/21/94
$51.49
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
182287
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
2995
03/21/94
$4.25
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
182194
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
2994
03/21/94
$173.06
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQ
REPAIR PARTS
182193
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
2994
144170
$228.80*
03/21/94
$100.00
LONGHI, KIM
PERFORM /EDINBOROUGH
033194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144171
$100.00*
03/21/94
$263.59
LUBTECH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120491
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2705
144172
$263.59*
03/21/94
$34.53
LUTZ. RICHARD M
WINE LICENSE INSPECT
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
144173
$34.53*
03/21/94
$26.24
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
533121
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
144174
$26.24*
03/21/94
$116.95
M & I IND SUPPLY
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
48758
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
2686
144175
$116.95*
03/21/94
$334.20
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27266
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$250.65
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27248
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$334.20
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27016
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$334.20
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27087
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$183.81
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27092
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
144176
$1,437.06*
03/21/94
$228.50
M/A PETERSON DESIGNBUI
REFUND PERMIT FEE
030794
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
144177
$228.50*
03/21/94
$142.58
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
ROD END
2941234
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS -2891
144178
$142.58*
03/21/94
$75.00
MACA
GENERAL SUPPLIES /POL
030294
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
144179
$75.00*
03/21/94
$540.00
MACKERMAN, DANNY
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144180
$540.00*
03/21/94
$176.00
MAKELA, BARB
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144181
$176.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17 1994 00:25:30 Page 16
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------ - - - - --
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
144182
03/21/94
144183
03/21/94
144184
03/21/94
144185
03/21/94
144186
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
144187
03/21/94
144188
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
144189
03/21/94
144190
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
144191
03/21/94
03/21/94
03/21/94
$965.90
$1,272.57
$189.00
$1,341.55
$13.60
$3,389.40
$29.75
$98.20
$1,409.35
$34.20
$30.70
$54.75
$8,82.8.97*
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
SALES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD M
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD M
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD M
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD M
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD B
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD M
224609 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
224564 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
224263 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
224565 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
224610 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
222046 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
222047 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
222045 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
222043 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
222044 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
0228 /VER VERNON SELLING CST -OF GDS BEE
222093 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
$426.60 MARLIN INDUSTRIAL DIVI CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 020894 SUPERV. & OVRH CONF & SCHOOLS
$426.60*
$43.00 MAURI JO HERBES
$43.00*
$100.00 MAWP
$100.00*
$69.60 MCGARVEY COFFEE
$69.60*
$184.62 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
$341.36 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
$2,019.50 MCGUIRE.AUTO SUPPLY
$166.41 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
$2,711.89*
$454.96 MCNEILUS STEEL
$454.96*
$284.15
$37.49
$410.03
$40.63
$772.30*
$100.00
$100.00*
$386.48
$278.17
$156.28
$820.93*
$109.00
$40.00
$60.00
MECO
MECO
MECO
MECO
MERFELD, BURT
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MESSERLI & KRAMER
MESSERLI & KRAMER
MESSERLI & KRAMER
BEER LINES
022894
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
CONT ED /POLICE
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
COFFEE
1924964
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3260
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030194/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
ACCESSORIES
030194/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
REPAIR PARTS
030194/P
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
030194/G
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
189474
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
62424
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2868
GENERAL SUPPLIES
62558
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
REPAIR PARTS
62308
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2694
REPAIR PARTS
62319
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2764
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35496
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
2935
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35542
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
CLEANING SUPPLIES
35562
CENTENNIAL. LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
3172
AMBULANCE COLLECTION
518201
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
AMBULANCE COLLECTION
22586
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
AMBULANCE COLLECTION
22587
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
s
I
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 17
CHECK NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
144192
$209.00*
03/21/94
$298.50
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
138
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
2983
144193
$298.50*
03/21/94
$25.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
TITLE /TAX SEARCH
410369
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
3025
144194
$25.00*
�-
03/21/94
$1,732.50
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BUILDING PERMITS
FEB 1994
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
144195
$1,732.50*
03/21/94
$1,665.67
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
14184
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
144196
$1,665.67*
03/21/94
$474.16
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPL
PAPER SUPPLIES
10173
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
3241
144197
$474.16*
03/21/94
$175.21
MIDWEST MACHINERY INC
REPAIR PARTS
27384
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2812
144198
$175.21*
03/21/94
$95.63
MIDWEST SPORTS MARKETI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
113674
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
3176
144199
$95.63*
03/21/94
$7.00
MIDWEST VENDING INC
REFUND LICENSE FEE
031194
GENERAL FD PRO
FOOD VENDING
144200
$7.00*
03/21/94
$269.85
MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS
COURSE SUPPLIES
7788
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
2992
03/21/94
$565.95
MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS
NORMANDALE COURSE SU
7788
GC CIP
GENERAL SUPPLI
144201
$835.80*
03/21/94
$169.65
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOO
TOOLS
25587220
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
03/21/94
$76.68
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOO
TOOLS
25554470
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
1467
144202
$246.33*
03/21/94
$24.48
MINN COMM PAGING
PAGER
10000029
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
03/21/94
$24.48
MINN COMM PAGING
RADIO SERVICE
22509603
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
144203
$48.96*
03/21/94
$647.63
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCH
FIRE SAFETY BROCHURE
49968
JUV FIRE PREV
INTEREST BONDS
144204
$647.63*
03/21/94
$66.43
MINNEAPOLIS SPOKESMAN
WANT ADS
01CCNA
-CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
144205
$66.43*
03/21/94
$3,290.31
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
022494
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
144206
$3,290.31*
03/21/94
$19.17
MINNESOTA CONWAY
REPAIR PARTS
199459
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
2700
144207
$19.17*
03/21/94
$480.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
030794
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
03/21/94
$600.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0
LAB CERTIFICATION
030194
LABORATORY
DUES & SUBSCRI
144208
$1,080.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 18
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$936.00
MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT 0
FUEL TAX
FEB 1994
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
144209
$936.00*
03/21/94
$104.00
MINNESOTA
PETROLEUM SE
REPAIR PARTS
31057
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
144210
$104.00*
03/21/94
$105.85
MINNESOTA
PIPE & EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12087
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2588
03/21/94
$105.44
MINNESOTA
PIPE & EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12088
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2588
03/21/94
$296.96
MINNESOTA
PIPE & EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12096
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2701
03/21/94
$206.46
MINNESOTA
PIPE & EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12089
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2588
144211
$714.71*
03/21/94
$324'.00
MINNESOTA
ROBBY
REPAIR PARTS
046321
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
144212
5324.00*
03/21/94
$57.67
MINNESOTA
SUN PUBLICAT
ORD 1994 -2
11540
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
03/21/94
$30.80
MINNESOTA
SUN PUBLICAT
ORD 1994 -3
11541
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
03/21/94
$23.70
MINNESOTA
SUN PUBLICAT
ORD 850A3
11542
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
03/21/94
$12.64
MINNESOTA
SUN PUBLICAT
HRG -HOLLY HILLS ESTA
11527
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
144213
$124.81*
03/21/94
$5.06
MINNESOTA
TORO DIST CO
REPAIR PARTS
400183
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
2842
03/21/94
$6.36
MINNESOTA
TORO DIST CO
REPAIR PARTS
401324
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
2903
144214
$11.42*
03/21/94
$466.80
MINNESOTA'S
BOOKSTORE
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
36660
POLICE DEPT. G
BOOKS & PAMPHL'2894
144215
$466.80*
03/21/94
$224.31
MINVALCO
WASH PARTS
4021563
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2865
144216
$224.31*
03/21/94
$148.04
MITCHELL
INTERNATIONAL
DATA PROCESSING
1284683
EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROCESSIN
144217
$148.04*
03/21/94
$75.00
MN DARE OFFICERS ASSOC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
030194
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
2608
144218
$75.00*
03/21/94
$6.00
MN EXTENSION
SERVICE -H
BOOKLETS
10668
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
144219
$6.00*
03/21/94
$2,278.00
MN STATE
TREA /BLG IN
BUILDING PERMITS
FEB 1994
GENERAL FD PRO
BUILDING PERMI
144220
$2,278.00*
03/21/94
$38.85
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
147792
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
885.23
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
147445
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$186.10
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
148116
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$105.00
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
.147790
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
144221
$415.18*
03/21/94
$65.00
MN. ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR SERVICE
020396
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
144222
$65.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$6.49
MN. WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
20691
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
144223
$6.49*
03/21/94
4130.00
MN /S.C.I.A.
CONT ED /POLICE
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
144224
$130.00*
03/21/94
$107.85
MOORE MEDICAL CORP
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
7628192
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
144225
$107.85*
03/21/94
$132.80
MOTOROLA INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC
W2765445
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
144226-
-
$132.80*
03/21/94
$160.00
MPCA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
030294
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
144227
$160.00*
03/21/94
$316.12
MPLS FINANCE DEPARTMEN
METER TEST
61234
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
144228
$316.12*
03/21/94
$62.00
MRPA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
031194
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
144229
$62.00*
03/21/94
$17.25
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
5309
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2775
03/21/94
$462.21
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
5319
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2785
03/21/94
$102.88
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
5329
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2815
03/21/94
$53.50
MUNICILITE CO
ACCESSORIES
5365
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2942
144230
$635.84*
03/21/94
$55.00
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
20171/20
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
144231
$55.00*
03/21/94
$391.85
NAME BRAND SPORTS
WINDBREAKERS - VOLUNTE
022394
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
2627
144232
$391.85*
03/21/94
$175.00
NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATI
DUES
031494
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
144233
$175.00*
03/21/94
$196.79
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
729069
VERNON OCCUPAN
ALARM SERVICE
03/21/94
$619.54
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
791999
CLUB HOUSE
ALARM SERVICE
03/21/94
$197.42
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
792070
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
03/21/94
$156.26
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
792068
ART CENTER BLD
ALARM SERVICE
144234
$1,170.01*
03/21/94
$40.00
NCTRC
DUES /ADAPTIVE REC
030794
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
144235
440.00*
03/21/94
$160.00
NELSON, J THOMAS
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144236
$160.00*
03/21/94
$71.34
NICHOLS NET & TWINE IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2748
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
2896
144237
$71.34*
03/21/94
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144238
$100.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 20
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$746.32
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO
SALT
828381
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
03/21/94
$1,462.05
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO
SALT
827089
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
03/21/94
$1,603.06
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO
SALT
826329
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
03/21/94
$1,421.32
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO
SALT
824977
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
144239
$5,232.75*
-
03/21/94
$89.00
NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL
CONFERENCES
& SCHOOL
021794
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
144240
$89.00*
03/21/94
$218.12
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
080824
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$44.90
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
080755
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
2901
03/21/94
$137.54
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
080786
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
2904
144241
$400.56*
03/21/94
$14.72
NORTHERN AIRGAS
OXYGEN
SUPPLIES
47450
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST
AID SUPP
2617
03/21/94
$42.13
NORTHERN AIRGAS
FIRST AID
SUPPLIES
49337
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST
AID SUPP
2617
144242
$56.85*
03/21/94
$153.49
NORTHERN
REPAIR
PLUMBING
202816TI
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR
REPAIRS
3102
03/21/94
$499.49
NORTHERN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
202743
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3095
144243
$652.98*
03/21/94
$180.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
83606
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
03/21/94
$37.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
83002
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS MIX
144244
$217.20*
03/21/94
$17.99
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
215982
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD FOOD
2711
03/21/94
$72.50
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
215997
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD FOOD
2539
03/21/94
$151.53
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
216256
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD FOOD
2920
03/21/94
$200.47
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
216505
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD FOOD
144245
$442.49*
03/21/94
$310.17
NORTHWESTERN SERVICE I
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
32673
GOLF DOME
CONTR
REPAIRS
144246
$310.17*
03/21/94
$420.68
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8499
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$174.45
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8312
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$31.26
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8574
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$166.24
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
HAZ. WASTE
DISPOSAL
NW8500
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
03/21/94
$31.26
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8600
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$253.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8027
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$253.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8209
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$253.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW7744
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
03/21/94
$253.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES &
TUBES
NW8136
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
144247
$1,837.17*
03/21/94
$204.95
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
& POWER
03/21/94
$68.38
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
& POWER
03/21/94
$157.50
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
NORMANDALE GC
LIGHT
& POWER
03/21/94
$7,042.34
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
& POWER
03/21/94
$486.75
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
GUN RANGE
LIGHT
& POWER
03/21/94
$119.25
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
& POWER
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 21
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$2,153.94
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$7.40
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$9,874.60
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$866.53
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$30.49
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$1,268.12
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
GOLF DOME
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$6,489.14
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
ED BUILDING &
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$71.84
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$3,805.41
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$494.30
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$7.40
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$66.88
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
03,2194
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$3,303.48
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$624.67
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$31.12
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$1,438.35
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$4,292.46
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
PW BUILDING
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$709.30
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$4,307.94
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT &
POWER
03/21/94
$1,716.57
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
032194
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT &
POWER
144249
$49,639.11"
03/21/94
$83.26
O.B. OF MINNEAPOLIS IN
REPAIR PARTS
13350
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR
PARTS
03/21/94
$440.49
O.B. OF MINNEAPOLIS IN
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
13355
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2043
144250
$523.75"
03/21/94
$57.51
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
32266
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
2906
144251
$57.51"
03/21/94
$220.65
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
52348
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3038
03/21/94
$250.49
OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE
TOOLS
52535
TREES & MAINTE
TOOLS
2663
144252
$471.14"
03/21/94
$15.98
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM
VGA EXT
CABLE
223397
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
144253
$15.98"
03/21/94
$58.50
ORKIN
PEST CONTROL
826833
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
144254
.$58.50"
03/21/94
$87.28
PAPER DEPOT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
1116
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
2538
144255
$87.28*
03/21/94
$233.00
PARAMOUNT CERAMICS INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
86245
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF
GD FOOD
144256
$233.00"
03/21/94
$189.80
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M
16396310
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
03/21/94
$135.50
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
M
16996110
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
03/21/94
$125.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
F
16804006
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD FOOD
03/21/94
$147.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
F
030194
CLUB HOUSE
CST OF
GD FOOD
03/21/94
$80.00
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
F
16108005
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD FOOD
144257
$677.30"
03/21/94
$20.00
PETERSON, DAVID
SERVICES
/EDINBOROUGH
031194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 22
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144258
$20.00*
03/21/94
$37.28
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3949
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
144259
$37.28*
03/21/94
$247.91
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
REPAIR PARTS
1472184
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2948
144260
$247.91*
03/21/94
533.12
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
687327
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
144261
$33.12*
03/21/94
$17,937.00
POLAR CHEVROLET
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
5177
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
1977
144262
$17,937.00*
03/21/94
$5,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
030894
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
144263
$5,000.00*
03/21/94
$780.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE /ART CENTER
031594
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
144264
$780.00*
03/21/94
$2,711.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE /ABOUT TOWN
031594
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
144265
$2,711.00*
03/21/94
$220.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
030494
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
144266
$220.00*
03/21/94
$1,544.25
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
REMOVAL OF MARKED EL
031594
Six Year Trees
CIP
03/21/94
$1,160.85
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
REMOVAL OF DISEASED
030294
Six Year Trees
CIP
144267
$2,705.10*
03/21/94
$102.22
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
SHOP SUPPLIES
004088
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3116
144268
$102.22*
03/21/94
$98.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
BLADE SHARPENING
94562
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
144269
$98.00*
03/21/94
$1,702.50
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING
PROF ENG SERVICES
030394
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
144270
$1,702.50*
03/21/94
$65.00
PUCKETT, JIM
SOCCER LEAGUE
031594
GOLF PROG
DOME RENTAL
144271
$65.00*
03/21/94
$104.16
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
54012
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2854
03/21/94
$154.06
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
52903
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2767
03/21/94
$56.74
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
54311
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2869
144272
$314.96*
-
03/21/94
$227.00
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
145604
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
144273
$227.00*
03/21/94
$40.99
REACH EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
B90790
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2796
144274
$40.99*
i
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 23
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7----------------------------------
03/21/94
$227.80
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
.00364
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
03/21/94
$245.65
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
00364
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
03/21/94
$504.05
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
00364
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
144275
$977.50*
03/21/94
$1,546.00
REGION 6AA
SPECTATOR FEE %
030894
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
144276
$1,546.00*
03/21/94
$1,234.00
REGION 6A
SPECTATOR FEE %
030894
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
144277
$1,234.00*
03/21/94
$30.00
REINERS, TOMI
REFUND SKATING EDINB
030994
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
144278
$30.00*
03/21/94
$805.00
RESIDENTIAL RESURRECTI
CONSTRUCTION
031594
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
144279
$805.00*
03/21/94
$1,272.15
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 81779
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$41.40
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M 81780
YORK SELLING
CST OF,GDS MIX
03/21/94
$1,254.31
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 81781
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$885.55
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 81782
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,250.65
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 80982
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$2,574.10
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 80986
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$17.90
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M 80986
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$1,854.60
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 80985
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$25.50
REX DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 81279
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144280
$9,176.16*
03/21/94
$93.02
RIEDELL SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
111235
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$274.34
RIEDELL SHOES
SKATES
111495
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
144281
$367.36*
03/21/94
$11.67
ROAD RESCUE
ACCESSORIES
142616
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2682
144282
$11.67*
03/21/94
$224.77
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
9410712
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
144283
$224.77*
03/21/94
$30.00
RUANE, SHARON
REFUND SKATING EDINB
022894
EDINB/CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
144284
$30.00*
03/21/94
$384.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$246.00
RUDQUIST, MONICA
PT MAINT ART CENTER
031594
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
144285
$630.00*
03/21/94
$413.70
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ C
REPAIR PARTS
75707
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2799
144286
$413.70*
03/21/94
$192.31
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
49130
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
03/21/94
$153.57
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
49258
DISTRIBUTION
SAND,GRVL & RO
03/21/94
$667.83
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
49313
DISTRIBUTION
SAND,GRVL & RO
03/21/94
$1,668.71
SA -AG INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
49376
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
144287
$2,682.42*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
J
Page 24
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$151.23
SAFETY KLEEN
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
166256
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
144288
$151.23*
03/21/94
$45.00
SCHMIDT, ERIC
TOBACCO ENF
031194
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
144289
$45.00*
03/21/94
$80.07
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
030194/A
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
144290
$80.07*
03/21/94
$31.00
SCHWARTZ, S.A.
WINE LICENSE INSPECT
030394
POLICE DEPT'. G
INSP. EXP.
144291
$31.00*
03/21/94
$229.42
SEELYE PLASTICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270545
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2678
144292
$229.42*
03/21/94
$150.00
SHANNON'S ROOFING COMP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
022694
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
144293
$150.00*
03/21/94
$112.13
SHANNON, CARL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
031594
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI
144294
$112.13*
03/21/94
$2,350.00
SHARE -A -HOME
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
021094
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
144295
$2,350.00*
03/21/94
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144296
$100.00*
03/21/94
$26.49
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
REPAIR PARTS
90004
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3062
03/21/94
$110.16
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL_ SUPPLIES
89741
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
144297
$136.65*
03/21/94
$18.00
SIRACUSA, WENDY
CLASS REFUND
030294
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
144298
$18.00*
03/21/94
$61.37
SMEGAL, GREGORY
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
030194
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144299
$61.37*
03/21/94
$1,946.30
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36608
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$724.95
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36609
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$566.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36748
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,612.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36747
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$137.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36805
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
144300
84,986.55*
03/21/94
$50.00
SOUTHWEST FIRE LEAGUE
DUES /FIRE 1994
031194
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCRI
144301
$50.00'
03/21/94
$6,566.51
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CAB
SECOND QUARTER
031094
COMMUNICATIONS
PRO SVC OTHER
144302
$6,566.51*
03/21/94
$225.00
SPECIAL OPS TRAINING C
CONT ED /POLICE
031494
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
144303
$225.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17 1994 00:25:30
Page 25
CHECK NO
---------------7-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$410.20
SPS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2169428
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3065
03/21/94
$191.19
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2168812
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3030
144304
$601.39*
03/21/94
$632.00
ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVER
DRIVER TRAINING
LLB80280
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144305
$632.00*
03/21/94
$254.67
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING PERSONNE
022894
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
144306
$254.67*
03/21/94
$916.35
STATE OF MINNESOTA
FILING FEES
031194
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
144307
5916.35*
03/21/94
$1,065.00
STATE OF.MINNESOTA
FILING FEES
0311
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
144308
$1,065.00*
03/21/94
$15.00
STATE TREASURER
LICENSES & PERMITS
030794
.TRAINING
LIC & PERMITS
144309
$15.00*
03/21/94
$30.00
STEEN, SUE
REFUND SKATING EDINB
022894
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
144310
$30.00*
03/21/94
$400.00
STEIN, AMY
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144311
.$400.00*
03/21/94
$97.28
STEINBACH, BRUCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030494
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
144312
$97.28*
03/21/94
$8,700.00
STORE FRONT
PROF SERVICES
1123
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
144313
$8,700.00*
03/21/94
$882.84
STREICHERS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
79001.1
POLICE DEPT. G
SAFETY EQUIPME
2549
144314
$882.84*
03/21/94
$103.16
STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH
PROF ENG SERV
0931832/
PRE - EMPTION
EQUIP REPLACEM
144315
$103.16*
03/21/94
$5.40
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199305
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$219.33
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199102
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$446.02
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
170091
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
03/21/94
$3.56
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199948
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$84.01
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199864
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$21.36
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199842
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$98.67
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
199412
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
144316
$878.35*
03/21/94
$398.00
SUBURBAN PROPANE
GASOLINE
021794
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
144317
$398.00*
.
03/21/94
$1,875.00
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORIT
DUES
1994
SUB.RATE AUTH.
PROF SERVICES
144318
$1,875.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$50.00
SULLIVAN, MONICA
AC INSTRUCTOR
031594
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144319
$50.00*
03/21/94
$43.98
SUPERAMERICA
GASOLINE
031494
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
144320
$43.98*
03/21/94
$76.97
SUPERIOR FORD
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
85375
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
144321
$76.97*
03/21/94
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144322
$100.00*
03/21/94
$61.20
SYMANTEC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030194
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
144323
$61.20*
03/21/94
$270.61
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
030194
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
03/21/94
$28.93
SYSCO- MINNESOTA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030194
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPLI
144324
$299.54*
03/21/94
84.37
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISK
3101
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$6.71
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
003083
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$196.24
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3067
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3175
03/21/94
$29.86
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
003083
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3182
03/21/94
$48.47
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
003034
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3105
03/21/94
$11.07
SYSTEM SUPPLY
BACKUP TAPES
003029
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$49.00
SYSTEM SUPPLY
BACKUP TAPES
003029
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
3100
144325
$345.72*
03/21/94
$50.52
TAMARACK MATERIAL
REPAIR PARTS
363342
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
2871
144326
$50.52*
03/21/94
$40.11
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
85312
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$46.80
TARGET
OFFICE SUPPLIES
021194
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
144327
$86.91*
03/21/94
$58.00
TAUNTON PRESS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
030894
GENERAL FD PRO
DUES & SUBSCRI
144328
$58.00*
03/21/94
$42.40
TECHNICAL ARTS CORPORA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
022694
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPLI
144329
$42.40*
03/21/94
$177.00
THE CONNECTION
ADVERTISING OTHER
16292
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
144330
$177.00*
03/21/94
$118.22
THE KANE SERVICE
SECURITY -PRO SERVIC
5390285
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
144331
$118.22*
03/21/94
$462.74
THE PRINT SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23099
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2821
144332
$462.74*
03/21/94
$385.25
THOMAS MOORE INC
TEMP HELP
00168
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
03/21/94
$368.00
THOMAS MOORE INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
20105
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
144333
$753.25*
A
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 27
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
03/21/94
$13,400.88
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROSECUTING
81415
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
144334
$13,400.88*
03/21/94
$1,187.55
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
29365
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$103.20
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
29365
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
03/21/94
$237.30
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
29658
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$1,917.45
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
28951
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
03/21/94
$21.30
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
28951
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144335
$3,466.80*
03/21/94
$35.92
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP
TIRES & TUBES
257450
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
2879
03/21/94
$17.17
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
258681
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2970
03/21/94
$119.00
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
479971
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
144336
$172.09*
03/21/94
$126.91
TOOLS BY OLSEN
TOOLS
78778
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
3038
144337
$126.91*
03/21/94
$156.74
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
030394
RESERVE PROGRA
UNIF ALLOW
03/21/94
$1,409.52
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
03/21/94
- $61.15
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
03/21/94
$42.04
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030394
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
144338
$1,547.15*
03/21/94
$430.26
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28562500
PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS
2819
03/21/94
$15.98
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28828800
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
3037
03/21/94
$76.23
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28730400
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
- $52.06
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
94724200
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2565
03/21/94
- $58.51
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
94655600
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$18.47
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28049201
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
2412
03/21/94
$27.72
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28352300
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2599
03/21/94
$151.37
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28611600
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
2859
144339
$609.46*
03/21/94
$85.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
030894
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144340
$85.00*
03/21/94
$26.63
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
030194
PARKING MONITO
TELEPHONE
144341
$26.63*
03/21/94
$4,472.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$869.31
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$62.22
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$109.92
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$242.97
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$115.85
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
GUN RANGE
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$106.54
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$54.16
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$151.76
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
'TELEPHONE
032194
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$182.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$449.72
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
03/21/94
$54.16
US WEST.COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
DARE
TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 28
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$208.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
032194
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
144342
$7,079.41*
03/21/94
$2,646.15
USAQUATICS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030494
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
3239
144343
$2,646.15*
03/21/94
$56.00
VAA, KATHLEEN
CLASS REFUND
030194
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
144344
$56.00*
03/21/94
$74.31
VACUUM CENTER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
14957
GOLF DOME
CONTR REPAIRS
144345
$74.31*
03/21/94
$470.73
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
003445
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
03/21/94
$12.25
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
004230
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
03/21/94
$35.15
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
004020
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
03/21/94
- $76.68
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
004019
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
144346
$441.45*
03/21/94
$374.40
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12842
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
3003
03/21/94
$330.62
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12839
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
3003
144347
$705.02*
03/21/94
$108.63
VOSS LIGHTING
ELECTRIC SUPPLY
236178
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
2699
03/21/94
$497.23
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
236580
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
2858
03/21/94
$36.30
VOSS LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
236590
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
144348
$642.16*
03/21/94
$169.96
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
6015644
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2955
03/21/94
$307.22
W W GRAINGER
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
6986562
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
2856
03/21/94
$112.16
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
49528581
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
03/21/94
$72.94
W W GRAINGER
TOOLS
49869938
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
2867
03/21/94
$34.78
W W GRAINGER
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
49869863
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
2856
03/21/94
$257.37
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
49601991
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2883
144349
$954.43*
03/21/94
$100.00
WALBRIDGE, DAVID
PERFORM /EDINBOROUGH
032494
CENTENNIAL LAK
PRO SVC OTHER
144350
$100.00*
03/21/94
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144351
$100.00*
03/21/94
$94.79
WARNING LITES OF MINNE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8959
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
2804
144352
$94.79*
03/21/94
$250.00
WASSMUND, TOM
SNOW PLOW CONTRACT
01016
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
144353
$250.00*
03/21/94
$84.24
WATER PRO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
542655
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
2774
144354
$84.24*
03/21/94
$20.23
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIE
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIES
03/21/94
$43.28
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PRISONER MEALS
031594
POLICE DEPT. 0
PRISONER MEALS
03/21/94
$80.23
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 17
1994 00:25:30
Page 29
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
------------7--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/21/94
$121.98
WATERSTREET, JOAN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
03/21/94
$11.98
WATERSTREET, JOAN
LAUNDRY
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
03/21/94
$20.20
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
03/21/94
$67.96
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MEETING EXPENSE
031594
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPENS
144355
$365.86*
03/21/94
$416.50
WENDY ANDERSON ENTERPR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
030194
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
A 144356
$416.50*
03/21/94
$232.94
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
REPAIR PARTS
9929
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2876
03/21/94
$369.70
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
REPAIR PARTS
7930
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3063
144357
$602.64*
03/21/94
$96.85
WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC -P
REPAIR PARTS
756728
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
2674
03/21/94
$92.50
WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC -P
GENERAL SUPPLIES
767714
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
144358
$189.35*
03/21/94
$372.75
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
42257
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2805
03/21/94
$16.25
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
42180
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
2805
144359
$389.00*
03/21/94
$141.58
WILLIAMS STEEL
TOOLS
538871
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
2882
03/21/94
$51.64
WILLIAMS STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
53375203
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
144360
$193.22*
03/21/94
$31.94
WOLD, MIKE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030294
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
144361
$31.94*
03/21/94
$100.00
WROBLESKI, HENRY
POLICE SERVICES
MARCH 19
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
144362
$100.00*
03/21/94
$665.63
XEROX CORP
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
40923572
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP RENTAL
144363
$665.63*
03/21/94
$85.20
ZACKS IND CLEANING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1804
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
2998
144364
$85.20*
03/21/94
$63.61
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
54188922
ED ADMINISTRAT
SAFETY EQUIPME
03/21/94
$99.16
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
54065274
ARENA ADMINIST
SAFETY EQUIPME
3177
03/21/94
$10.17
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
54065275
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
03/21/94
$40.15
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
54065278
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3115
144365
$213.09*
03/21/94
$319.18
ZIEGLER INC
REPAIR PARTS
MCB5785
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2853
03/21/94
$18.68
ZIEGLER INC
REPAIR PARTS
MC83922
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2784
03/21/94
$485.73
ZIEGLER INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FM34079
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
144366
$823.59*
$486,035.10
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Mar 17 1994 00:27:24
Page 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
GENERAL FUND
$185,534.80
FUND
#
11
C.D.B.G.
$830.00
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATION
$14,961.81
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$9,250.57
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$9,695.18
FUND
#
26
SWIMMING POOL
$2,824.45
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE
$84,423.95
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA
$32,310.64
FUND
#
29
GUN RANGE
$654.31
FUND
#
30
EDINB /CENT LAKES
$22,063.31
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$31,441.58
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER
$3,064.81
FUND
#
42
RECYCLING
$39,839.29
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR FUND
$47,494.31
FUND
#
60
CONSTRUCT FUND
$1,646.09
$486,035.10