HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 4, 1994
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made. by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked
with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to
be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence
of the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of March 21, 1994
II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 03/31/94 Total: $15,881.77
II. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Council Meeting of March 21, 1994-
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of Council required to pass if improvement petitioned for; 4/5
favorable rollcall vote required if no petition.
A. Street and Bridge Improvement No BA 303 - Centennial Lakes Phase II -
Parklawn Avenue
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of
all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of
Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Prel�y Plat Approval - Holly Hill Estates, 5020 Blake Rd (Continued
from 03/07/94
B. PreliminaKX Rezonin - Planned Commercial District PCD -4 and Sin le
Dwelling Unit District R -1 to Planned Residence District PRD 4 4101 Wiest
50th Street, 5014, 5016 and 5024 Halifax Avenue, Haymaker Construction, Inc.
(Continued from 03/21/94 - Continue to 04/18/94)
C. Set Hearin Date (04/18/94)
1. Final Development Plan - Part of Lot 18, Block'l, Edina Interchange
Center Third Addition - 7171 Ohms Lane, Honeywell, Inc.
Agenda
Edina City Council
April 4, 1994
Page Two
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. . Letter Regarding Massage Ordinance - Helen Bair, The Nail Techs of Edina
V. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Improvements BA -293, BA -299 and STS -219 (Valley'Viev Road b West 66th
Street Project)
* B. Sand, Bituminous, Rock, Concrete, Propane and Engine Oil
* C. Water Treatment Chemicals
* D. Art Center Class Schedule Brochures
* E. Change Order - Power Assisted Door Openers - City Hall
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Massage Ordinance Requirements
B. Permit to Keep Extra Dogs - 4817 Vandervork Av
C. Report on Application for 3.2 Beer License - American Legion
* D. Report on "Race for the Cure" - May 8, 1994
* E. Approval of Local 320 Contract for Non - Essential Employees
F. Report on Garbage Collection Options
G. Purchasing Policies and Procedures (Continued from 03/21/94)
H. Hopkins Arts Facility
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
X. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 04/31/94 Total: $633,324.82
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Wed
Apr
6
Annual Council /Boards /Commissions Dinner
6:00
P.M.
Braemar Clubhouse
Sat
Apr
9
Council Study Session
8:00
A.M.
Centennial Lakes
Mon
Apr
11
Board of Review
5:00
P.M.
Council Chambers
Mon
Apr
18
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council Chambers
Wed
Apr
20
Annual Volunteers Reception
5:00
P.M.
Edinborough Park
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARCH 21, 1994
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion vas made by Commissioner Smith and was
seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the BRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF MARCH 7. 1994, APPROVED Motion vas made by
Commissioner Smith and vas seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the HRA
Mi�autes of March 7, 1994.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Kelly declared the
meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
a
i
HRA
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:06:35
Page 1
CHECK NO
----- - - -
DATE
- -- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
s
04/04/94
$24.50
CELLULAR ONE
TELPHONE
- -
032194/H
-
- - -- - ---------------------------------
GRANDVIEW
MISC
012551
$24.50*
04/04/94
$1,690.60
DORSEY & WHITNEY
PROFESSIONAL FEES
AU 356809
CENTENNIAL LAK
PRO FEES AUDIT
012552
$1,690.60*
04/04/94
$14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SENIOR CO
HRA BOND PAYMENT
APRIL 19
EDINBOROUGH
LOAN TO 0TH FU
012553
$14,166.67*
$15,881.77
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 21, 1994
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem
Kelly.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded
by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
DAY OF REMEMBRANCE OF VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST PROCLAIMED Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly
presented the following proclamation which was unanimously adopted by motion of
Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice:
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, six million Jews were systematically murdered by Nazi Germany and their
collaborators from 1933 to 1945, as well as hundreds of thousands of Sinti and
Roma (Gypsies) and the handicapped; millions of Poles, religious and political
dissidents, and those deemed by the Nazis to be "unworthy of life" were swept
into this abyss; and
WHEREAS, all citizens of the United States should remember the atrocities
committed by Nazi Germany and their collaborators and recognize that each of us
must remain vigilant against tyranny; and
WHEREAS, Friday, April 8, 1994, has been designated, pursuant to au -Act of
Congress, as a Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust, known
internationally as Yom Hashoah; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the citizens of Edina to join in this
commemoration with the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, this nation's
center for learning and remembrance of the Holocaust:
NOW, THEREFORE, I. Mary H. Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of the City.of Edina, do hereby
proclaim the week of Sunday April 3, through Sunday, April 10, 1994, as
DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE VICTIMS
OF THE HOLOCAUST
in memory of those victims and in the hope that we will strive, as a nation and
individually, to overcome prejudice and InIn*+anity through education, vigilance
and tolerance.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
TOBACCO FREE YOUTH DAY PROCLAIMED Mayor Pro-Tea Kelly read the following
proclamation which was unanimously adopted by motion of Member Paulus and
seconded by Member Rice:
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, more than 400,000 premature deaths occur each year in the United States
from tobacco - related causes. The epidemic is totally preventable '- and the key
opportunities for prevention are during childhood and adolescence.
WHEREAS, at least 3.1 million adolescents are current smokers, and smoking is
most common among 17 and 18 year olds with about 25 percent of these young people
smoking.
WHEREAS, nicotine is often the first drug used by young people who use alcohol,
marijuana and'harder drugs.
WHEREAS, for most smokers, nicotine addiction begins during childhood or
adolescence.
WHEREAS, cigarette advertising appears to increase young people's risk of smoking
by conveying that smoking has social benefits and that it is more common than it
WHEREAS, in Minnesota, teenagers were illegally sold over four and a half million
packs of cigarettes in 1991.
WHEREAS, the most effective preventive programs are community wide ones that
combine education and public policy approaches.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Nary H. Kelly, Mayor Pro -Tem of Edina, do hereby declare March
24, 1994, as
TOBACCO FREE YOUTH DAY
and urge all citizens of Edina to take part in this most important day.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
PRESENTATION OF AWARD TO CITY FROM MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF.PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
Manager Rosland advised the Council that the City of Edina is the recipient of
the "Seven Wonders of Engineering in Minnesota Award for Distinguished
Engineering Achievement" presented annually by the Minnesota Society of
Professional Engineers. The award recognized the "Chia" Wall constructed on
Blake Road along the southwest shore of Mirror Lake. The wall is a mechanically -
stabilized earth (MSE) wall with a vegetated face and is the first of this type
to be constructed.in the state of Minnesota. Manager Rosland presented the award
to City Engineer Hoffman and congratulated the Engineering staff on the project.
*MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 7. 1994, APPROVED Motion was made
by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting of March 7, 1994.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PRELIMINARY REZONING (PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
PCD -4 AND SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT. R -1 TO PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT
PRD -4) FOR 4101 WEST 50TH STREET 5014. 5016 AND 5024 HALIFAX AVENUE: HEARING
CONTINUED TO 4/4/94 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered
placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is generally located West of
Halifax Avenue and south of 50th Street and includes the Fina service station and
the three single family properties immediately to the - south. The proponent is
requesting rezoning from Planned Commercial District, PCD -4 and Single Dwelling
Unit District, .R -1 to Planned Residence District, PRD -4.
On February 2, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed a four story, 24 unit
multi - family redevelopment with underground parking for the service station and
the first two single family properties. The hearing was continued to allow the
developer time to address several issues, i.e. building height, density, lot
coverage, setbacks and exterior design.
On March 2, 1994, the Planning Commission considered revised plans submitted by
the proponent. First, the third single family, lot of nearly 10,000 square feet
(5024 Halifax) has been added resulting in a total site size of 48,115 square
feet. Second, unit count has been increased from 24 to 28 units. Third, the
building has been lowered from four to three stories. Finally, the exterior has
been.further detailed and more bays have been added.
Zoning Ordinance evaluation for the revised proposal is as follows:
Density
Gross lot area required per unit is 81,200 square feet
2,900 square feet
Credits:
Under building parking 500 square feet - 21,000 square feet
per space up to 1.5 spaces per unit
Type I or II Construction
500 square feet per unit
Required lot area
Lot area provided
No variance required.
Building Coverage
Maximum coverage allowed
Proposed coverage
Lot coverage variance required
Building Setback
Minimum setback
Setback Provided
North 45 feet
East 10 feet
South 49 feet
West 48 feet
Variance of 27.5 feet required from east property
Parking
Required:
Covered parking
Surface parking
Total
No parking variance
1.25 per unit
.75 per unit
2.00 per unit
required.
- 14,000 square feet
46,200 square feet
48,115 square feet
30.0%
35.3%
5.3%
35 feet or building
height if greater
Setback Required
35
feet
37.5
feet
36
feet
36
feet
line.
Proposed:
51 spaces or 1.82 per unit
14 spaces or .5 per unit
65 spaces or 2.32 per unit
The 50th and France Commercial Area Redevelopment Plan, adopted by the HRA and
the Council in 1974, shows the three single family dwelling lots, comprising
30,000 square feet, as potential residential redevelopment for 14 -16 units. The
Comprehensive Plan illustrates the subject lots as suitable for high density
residential. Both plans show the service station site as Commercial use.
The proposed redevelopment would require that both plans be amended.
Planner Larsen pointed out that, although not part of this hearing, the vacation
of a portion of the alley from Halifax Avenue to Indianola Avenue is critical to
the proposed redevelopment. The alley is proposed to be vacated from the
westerly property line of the site out to Halifax Avenue. The primary users of
the alley are the residents of the nine unit apartment building immediately west
of the service station. By letter dated March 17, 1994, the property management
company for the apartment building has expressed concern that the closing of the
alley would significantly restrict the ingress /egress ability of the residents
who currently use the alley to access the traffic light at Halifax /50th Street to
turn east or west. They have requested that the residents, by means of a private
easement, be able to cut though the development's parking lot to access Halifax
Avenue and the traffic signal.
Another concern that has been raised is the existing traffic and the traffic that
would be generated by the residents of the proposed building. It is anticipated
that for a 28 unit building approximately eight trips per unit per day would be
generated, i.e. 220 trips per day. A recent survey conducted for an hour and
one -half period in both the morning and the afternoon indicated that the service
station generated 140 trips for a total of up to 300 trips per day. The trip
generation from the three existing single family dwellings is estimated at 36
trips per day. Staff has concluded that the trips generated from the. proposed
building would be equal to or less than from the existing uses. It should be
noted that the current two curb cuts into the service station which are close to
the signalized intersection would be eliminated. Two new curb cuts are proposed
for the building. One ingress only would be located at the westerly property
line on 50th Street and a two -way primary entrance for the residents would be at
the southerly property line on Halifax Avenue leading directly to the underground
garage entrance.
At its meeting of March 2, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended preliminary
rezoning approval with the following conditions:
1) Final rezoning.
2) Replatting of the property.
3) Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan.
4) Amendment of the 50th and France Plan.
5) Vacation of portion of the alley.
6) Watershed District permit.
7) Lot coverage variance (5..3%) and setback variance
8) Landscaping plan, building materials description,
analysis at time of final rezoning.
(27.5 feet).
drop -off detail and traffic
Presentation by Proponent
Mark Haymaker, Haymaker Construction, Inc., presented a graphic illustrating the
proposed development. He explained that, in response to concerns of the Planning
Commission, they have incorporated the third single family property into the
site, have reduced the building from four to three stories and have added more
window bays and notches to architecturally reduce its massive appearance. He
said their goal is to design a building that will fit in with the characteristics
of downtown Edina. He pointed out that the adjacent commercial buildings have
long, continuous store fronts and that both the multi -unit Regency and The
Lanterns are five story buildings.
Mr. Haymaker elaborated that they will try to keep as many of the existing trees
as possible, will incorporate additional landscaping, and will use high quality
materials to construct an upscale condominium building. The building will be
three stories in height, will have underground parking, and some type of vaulted
ceiling is- proposed for the top floor.. To avoid the potential for a cluttered,
tacky look, no outside porches are proposed. The exterior material will mainly
be brick and will compliment the downtown area of Edina.
Member Smith. asked for the proposed building height at its tallest point and how
it related to The Lanterns. Mr. Haymaker responded that it would be 38 feet at
the highest point and that The Lanterns is at 58 feet.
Member Rice asked if Haymaker Construction had done similar projects and what the
anticipated price range would be for the units. Mr. Haymaker answered that in
Edina they had constructed the five story Jerry's Foods building and the
townhouse project at Interlachen/Vernon. He also mentioned other apartment
projects in Bloomington, Apple Valley and Blaine. Price range for the units
would be $180,000 to $250,000 with the average unit comprising 1400 square feet.
Member Paulus asked if the proposed development would be tied more to the
commercial area or the residential area, who would be the prospective buyers and
if there would be any controls placed on the unit owners regarding traffic flow
through the neighborhood. Mr. Haymaker said the development would be tied
aesthetically and architecturally to both the commercial and residential areas.
Interested buyers include younger professional couples as well as Edina empty
nesters. Concerning traffic, Mr. Haymaker said he would be willing to work with
the City regarding concerns of the neighborhood.
Public Comment
Lynn Griffith, 5124 Halifax Avenue, expressed concern about the length of the
building, noting that it would be out of character for the area.
Penny Van Kampen, 5117 Halifax Avenue, raised questions about the 50th and France
Commercial Area Plan, the exterior materials for the proposed building, and said
she was concerned about the loss of the large trees on the site, whether
sidewalks were proposed for the development and the traffic in and out of the
site.
Jerome Smith, 5100 Halifax Avenue, said he felt the proposed building was too
long and high, would take away the quaintness of the area and was not sensitive
to the residents of the neighborhood. He observed that the project would only
add to the existing traffic problems. In conclusion, he said Mr. Haymaker is
more concerned with the commercial interests of the City than that of the
residents.
Mike Dumond, 5032 Halifax Avenue, commented that at three stories the building
would look more like a commercial structure than residential and because of the
grade change would be even more imposing on the south end. He expressed concern
that the project would increase traffic backup at peak times and would result in
more traffic through the neighborhood.
Marna McPhail, 5109 Indianola Avenue, said she was concerned about where
residents of the building would be picked up or dropped because of the traffic
going in and out of Lund's.
Sara Van Winkel, 5121 Halifax Avenue, expressed concern for the safety of the 16
children in the first block on Halifax because there are no sidewalks. Because
50th and France is such a congested area, drivers tend to cut through the
neighborhood. She also questioned whether the landscaping would be adequate and
said she was concerned about losing the large oak trees on the back of the site,
and the size and appearance of the building.
Jill Methune, 5308 Halifax Avenue, said she moved to Halifax Avenue a year and a
half ago and would not have purchased that home if she had known what the 50th
and France Commercial Area Plan envisioned for the site. She suggested a better
project would be row houses similar to those in Georgetown, D.C.
Scott Borene, 5117 Halifax Avenue, commented that he felt the proposed
development was too ugly, too big, out of scale and not appropriate for the
neighborhood. He concurred that something smaller scale like townhouses would be
more appropriate. He also expressed concern for loss of the large trees and
added traffic. He asked the Council not to rush to a decision.
Sharon Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue, said the petitions that were circulated in
the neighborhood objected to the proposed building at 256'feet in length and
would like to see it decreased by 50 feet to better fit in with the neighborhood.
David Jacobson, 5021 Indianola Avenue, asked if a fence or retaining wall would
go behind the proposed building. Further, he asked what it would take to get a
variance for his property if he were to propose constructing an 8 -10 unit
building.
Andy Castellano, 5108 Gorgas Avenue, said he was concerned that this project
would be another "Regency" all over again which he considered to be an ugly
building that lacked character. The other issue is lot coverage which under 'the
revised proposal in reality is actually 17% above the normal maximum allowed. He
concluded by saying he was not opposed to a multi -unit building there but was
concerned with lot coverage, losing trees and the design of the building.
Tom Fletcher, 5137 Halifax Avenue, commented that the 50th and France Plan showed
the site as.suitable for 14 -16 residential units. He said he would not have a
problem with that size development but objected to something as big as what is
proposed. He observed that all the neighbors are objecting to the length�of the
building and feel it should be shortened.
Carol Ryan, 5115 Halifax Avenue, said her big concern was the traffic on Halifax
and asked that there be an extensive traffic survey before the Council votes on
the proposal. Without sidewalks, she expressed concern for the safety of the 16
children living on her block.
Eileen McCauley, 5025 Indianola Avenue, said she lives directly behind the third
house recently purchased for inclusion in the site. She told Council she just
purchased the house in September and would not have done so if she knew something
like this was going up in the neighborhood. She said that the length of the,
proposed building will cut down on the personal enjoyment of her home-and will
decrease the value of her property.
Dan Sundt, 5024 Indianola Avenue, said his concern was with the traffic and that
adding 28 more cars coming and going in the area is ridiculous.
Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue, said members of her family live in the
neighborhood. Her concerns and issues included the increase in the.number of
units, question of demonstrated hardship, sidewalks, traffic pattern at 50th
Street /Halifax, building length, building setback from Halifax, and traffic
safety.
Marty Rud, President, 50th /France Business and Professional Association, said the
concern of the association members was that the development would fit in the
master plan for the area. Their.objections concern the length and type of
building that goes up.
Response by Proponent
Mark Haymaker, Haymaker Construction, said there would be sidewalk along the
building sides. He said he has observed the traffic on Halifax and understands
the concerns of the neighbors. He said he would support whatever improvements
could be made to Halifax Avenue to reduce traffic. He argued that the type of
use proposed would lower the traffic counts from that generated by the existing
service station.
Regarding the number of units proposed, Mr. Haymaker said the 50th /France Plan
showing 14 -16 units for the residential properties did not take into account the
Fina property. By incorporating the Fina square footage it would make the
argument for the 28 units now proposed. He explained that the third house was
added to.the site to appease the neighbors by lowering the building height.
Mr. Haymaker said at final approval they will represent to the Council the plans
for materials, elevations, dropoff area, landscaping, etc. He noted that the
ingress /egress will be reduced in number from the existing five to two. The
entrance on Halifax has been moved further south to improve the sight line for
vehicles coming around the curve at Lund's.
Regarding the concern for the trees, Mr. Haymaker pointed out that there are 12
mature trees on the site, three of which lie within the footprint of the building
and will be lost. He said they plan to add landscaping to compensate.
In terms of the "neighborhood ", Mr. Haymaker said it includes a parking ramp, a
brick wall ( Lund's) facing the residential area, a parking lot, retail stores,
and a service station.
As to impact on the City, he said the development would, provide the opportunity
for residents of the City to stay in Edina and would release their homes for
younger families. It would serve handicapped residents because the project will
meet ADA requirements. It would also build the City's tax base.
Mr. Haymaker concluded by asking the Council to support the development which he
believed to be in keeping with the integrity of the City. Further, that they are
willing to make whatever changes the City feels necessary to make this a viable
and top quality project.
° John Nissen, Bernard Herman Architects, said he was the architect for the project
and wished to clarify the proposed building design. He pointed out that the
height at the middle entrance point is 37.5 feet; at the south end the height is
35 feet. He explained that the mansard roof gives the building better
proportion, a residential character, and breaks the roof line into three
segments. The two recesses in essence creates the appearance of three buildings.
Were the mansard roof to be eliminated it would reduce the building height but
would not be of benefit for building aesthetics. With reference to the building
setback, he explained that the setback is measured from the entrance canopy which
projects out from the building approximately 10 feet. Mr. Nissen indicated that
the rendering being shown does not represent the building in three dimensions.
He said, in their opinion, the building design is sensitive to-both the
commercial and residential surroundings and that the proposed use and design is
appropriate. As to density, he observed that the increased number of. units is in
compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the site. Also, with the
addition of the third residential property, more green space is provided than
shown on the original plan.
Council Comment /Action
Mayor Pro -Tem then asked for comment and action on the preliminary rezoning as
requested.
Member Rice commented that this is the first time the Council has seen the
proposed development, and while the Council has the report of the Planning
Commission many questions remain and he was not in a position to make a decision
on anything at this time. As to the citizens who question the planning process,
Member Rice said the Council does take these matters seriously and constantly
have in mind and review the Comprehensive Plan.
Member Rice said that traffic per se is not the issue; the question is traffic
circulation. He suggested that staff review the 1988 traffic study of Halifax
Avenue to determine if there are any significant changes -that would impact the
conclusion made then. He submitted that in his judgement a multi -unit building
in that area would not materially impact the area's traffic. Questions as to
circulation, guest parking, drop -off area should certainly be addressed by staff
and the proponent before the Council seriously considers the proposal.
Member Rice said this hearing is about land use and that he would support the
proposed use but maybe not at this density. Regarding the question of use of the
alleyway, he said he would want staff's opinion on that question. As to specific
questions that have been raised, Member Rice said he would want to see a
development agreement that would detail specifically what the community is going
to get.
Concerning the question of building height, Member Rice said he would like to
know the height in feet of the larger surrounding buildings. Regarding building
length, he agreed that it appears too long in everyone's judgement. As to the
issue of trees, he said they should be saved if possible but he did not think a
_.project of this size should be gerrymandered around existing trees. As to lot
coverage, Member Rice said he concurred that the variance being requested is
actually a 17% variance, and felt that was excessive although some percent of
variance may be warranted in this case.
Continuing, Member Rice said he would like to look at other projects that have
been designed by Mr. Nissen. Concerning the setback variance, he said it was
significant even if calculated from the building instead of from the canopy.
He said he would also like to see building elevations from the south and west
which are oriented to the residential neighborhood.
As to the comment that the density was in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Member Rice observed that the density will be what the Council concludes it
should be. Other comments relative to the site plan, trees, green space,
parking, etc. will be addressed later in the process if the project proceeds.
He concluded that the more complete the plans are when presented the easier it is
for the Council to consider and make its decision, but that is at the discretion
of the proponent.
Member Smith complimented Member Rice in identifying the type of issues the
Council is concerned with and said he concurred with most of his comments.
He said he felt the land use is appropriate but that he was not impressed with
the project as presented.
Member Paulus commented that this is not a popular vote because the Council must
look at the proposal for everyone in the City, not only those immediately
impacted but also those of future generations. She said the Council has to
consider the rights of the proponent as well as the rights of the individual
homeowner. The issue of trees and green space is the right of the individual
property owner. As to the impact on the City, Member Paulus said she is not
influenced by the dollars to the City but considers all impact categories. With
regard to the request for a traffic study, she said all studies that have been
done in the City are always inconclusive. Further, that the City cannot cut off
public use of the streets.
Member Paulus said the issue of greatest concern to her was that of variance.
State Statute clearly states that variance must be based on hardship that is not
self - imposed. In this case, she believed the variances were self- imposed, i.e.
the size of the project is tied to the financial aspect, and therefore she could
not vote in favor of the proposal. Member concluded that she had great concern
that this proposed building would severely alter the look of the neighborhood.
Mayor Pro -Tem suggested that, because of the number of questions raised by the
Council, the matter should be continued to the next meeting when the full Council
could address the rezoning request. Specifically, review of the 1988 traffic
study as related to area circulation, issue of vacation of the alley, height of
surrounding buildings and hardship basis to support the requested variances.
Member Rice made a motion to continue the public hearing on the rezoning request
to FRD -4 for 4101 Nest 50th Street, 5014, 5016 and 5024 Halifax Avenue to the
meeting of April 4, 1994, to allow staff to present further information on the
issues raised. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Member Smith suggested that the proponent work with staff in an effort to resolve
the issues that have been raised. Mr. Haymaker responded that they may be able
to redesign the building but would need the front setback variance in order to
build on the site.
PUBLIC NEARING CONDUCTED: 1994 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM APPROVED
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Pursuant to due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted on the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Year 1994.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen advised Council that Edina's 1994 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) entitlement is $197,821 out of Hennepin County's $3,688,000 budget.
This reflects a 10.8% increase over the 1993 allocation and is attributed to the
10.88 increase Hennepin County received from HUD.
The proposed 1994 program was presented to the Human Relations Commission on
March 15, 1994. The Commission recommended approval but voted to amend the
public service funding portion to reflect no increase for the H.O.M.E. program
over 1993 ($24,074) and that the additional $490.00 proposed for H.O.M.E. be
redirected toward the Child Day Care program. As a result, H.O.M.E. would
utilize 618 of the public services funding; Child Day Care would utilize 348 and
C.A.S.H. Homeline would utilize the remaining 58. The proposed budget was
presented as follows:
PROJECT BUDGET
C.A.S.H. HOMEline $ 2,000
Child Day Care Subsidy 13,490
Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) 24,074
Adaptive Recreation 1,500
Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers 116.757
TOTAL $197,821
Member Rice moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR 1994
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCS GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement
with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin
County CDBG funds made available to it, and held a public hearing on March 21,
1994 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing
and community development needs and the City's proposed use of $197,821 from the
1994 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Edina approves the following projects for
funding from the 1994 Urban Hennepin County Community Block Grant program and
authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion
in the 1994 Urban Hennepin County Community Block Grant Program Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds:
PROJECT BUDGET
C.A.S.H. HOMEline $ 2,000
Child Day Care Subsidy 13,490
Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) 24,074
Adaptive Recreation 1,500
Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers 116.757
TOTAL $197,821
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR BRAEMAR COLF COURSE WORK VEHICLE. Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a work vehicle for
Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Co., at
$10,863.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR UTILITY DEPARTMENT VAN Motion was made by Member Smith and was
seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one mini -cargo van for the Utility
Department to Thane Hawkins Chevrolet at $13,066.49, through Hennepin County
contract #2843A3.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
FINDINGS ADOPTED: PERMIT GRANTED TO KEEP EXTRA PETS AT _4737 HIBISCUS AVENUE
Sanitarian Velde recalled that William Wright, 4737 Hibiscus Avenue, had
submitted a permit application to keep extra dogs and cats following amendment of
the City's ordinance to establish such process. On March 7,1994, the Council
held a public hearing on the request and staff was directed to prepare findings
for consideration by Council on March 21, 1994, in support of granting a permit
to keep the two dogs and three cats specified in the application at 4737 Hibiscus
Avenue.
Sanitarian Velde presented the findings'of fact that the proposed permit would:
A. Not be a nuisance.
B. Not be detrimental to the public health and safety of the applicant or
other persons in the vicinity.
Conclusion:
A., The procedural requirements of the Ordinance have been met.
B. The permit should be granted as requested.
C. Conditions or restrictions applicable to this permit:
The two dogs will be kept in the fenced area, the three cats will be kept
indoors with one cat having limited freedom outdoors. Observe all
regulations relative to Animal Control Ordinance.
D. This permit shall be effective March 21, 1994, however, this permit shall
lapse and be of no effect unless all conditions and restrictions are
observed and the applicant observes all City Ordinances applicable to the
keeping of dogs and cats.
Member Paulus made a motion to adopt the findings as presented and.to grant a
permit to William and Sandra Wright to keep the two dogs and three cats at 4737
Hibiscus Avenue as specified in the permit application. Motion was seconded by
Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
PUBLIC EEARING EELD ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO KEEP EXTRA PETS AT 4817
VANDERVORK AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered
placed on file..
Sanitarian Velde advised Council that George Tate, 4817 Vandervork Avenue, has
submitted an application to keep four English Springer Spaniel dogs and two
English Cocker Spaniel dogs at his address. Notice of public hearing on the
application has been sent to all properties within 200 feet of the subject
property.
Presentation by Applicant
George Tate, 4817 Vandervork Avenue, told Council that his dogs are AKC
registered field -bred dogs which he and his son train and run in field trials.
He explained that his son has moved back from Colorado and at some point in time
will move out and take two of the dogs with him. Mr. Tate said although they may
breed a dog, they do not intend to whelp dogs at their home as that would be done
under more professional circumstances. He mentioned that the value of these dogs
range from $1500 to $3000 and they take good care of them, i.e. dogs are fed
strict diets, the yard is kept absolutely clean as is the one outside kennel.
Mr. Tate added that the yard is fenced and that he has talked with all his
neighbors who do not object to having the six dogs on the property.
Member Paulus asked if the dogs are outside for extended periods and if Mr. Tate
understood that the permit would apply only to the specific dogs listed thereon.
Mr. Tate responded that the dogs are only out for short periods of time and if
they begin to bark are brought in. He said he understood that if he wished to
replace one or more dogs he would have to apply again for a permit for any
replacement dog.
Member Smith suggested that any findings in this case indicate that two of the
dogs will leave when Mr. Tate's son moves out.
Public Comment
Gordon Bauman, 5233 Hollywood Road, explained that the corner of his lot abuts
the corner of Mr. Tate's lot and that Mr. Tate has not spoken with him regarding
this matter. Mr. Bauman mentioned that he is fond of dogs, has owned them in the
past and thought the Tates only had two dogs, which have never been a problem.
He said he would have concern about barking dogs because an adjacent property has
three dogs and would report such barking because he was aware that the City had
an ordinance regarding this. Member Smith interjected that the permit would be
conditioned on observing all regulations relative to the Animal Control
Ordinance. Member Paulus explained that the permit process for extra pets was
established to allow residents who already owned extra pets to be allowed to keep
them if they were not a problem.
Charlotte Gregory, 4821'Vandervork Avenue, testified that the Tate's dogs are
never out unless an adult is around, the dogs are a joy to watch, the yard is
cleaned twice a day and there is no odor. She said that the Tates have had dogs
for the 20 years they have lived there and the dogs have never been a problem.
Mrs. Gregory said other dogs at an adjacent property bark whenever they raise
their garage door.
Council Comment /Action
Member Rice made a motion that staff be directed to prepare findings for
consideration by the Council on April 4, 1994, in support of granting the Tates a
permit to keep the six dogs at 4817 Vandervork Avenue as described in the
application. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
ON -SALE WINE LICENSE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR GREAT FOOD. dba /ORIGINAL
PANCAKE HOUSEZE PIE Manager Rosland advised Council the City has received
applications for an On -Sale Wine License and 3.2 Beer License from Great Food,
Inc. who are the new owners for the Original Pancake House /My Pie restaurant at
3501 West 70th Street. The Police and Health Departments have reviewed the
applications and conducted the necessary investigations and would support
issuance of the requested licenses. Upon Council approval, necessary documents
would be submitted to Minnesota Liquor Control for their approval of the On -Sale
Wine License.
Member Rice made a motion to approve the On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Licenses for
Great Food, Inc.,, dba Original Pancake House/My Pie. Motion was seconded by
Member Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
OP -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Assistant Manager Hughes reported that
since the Council Meeting of March 7, 1994, Chief Bernhjelm and he had met with
Eric Olson, legal counsel for Mick's at Southdale. As a result of that meeting,
Mick's has submitted a letter dated March 18, 1994, from its General Manager,
Joseph F. Gainor. The letter outlines the plan which Mick's will implement to
ensure compliance with the requirements of the Edina City Code.
In staff's opinion, Mick's Southdale has demonstrated willingness to improve
their compliance with the requirements of their wine license and the plan
outlined represents a reasonable approach to improving their situation.
Staff would recommend renewal of Mick's wine license, subject to the following
conditions:
1). Implementation by Mick's on the in -house training and inspection program as
outlined in their letter.
2) Increase in the number of City inspections during the license term
(normally "three inspections are conducted). In this case, staff would
recommend that six inspections be conducted with the cost of these additional
inspections borne by Mick's.
3) Violations discovered during the license term will be presented to the City
Council for the purpose of considering the revocation, suspension or other
sanctions with respect to Mick's license.
Joseph Gainor, General Manager for Mick's, said that he has emphasized to the
wait staff that wine and beer may be served only after a meal has been ordered
and assured Council that compliance is being taken very seriously.
Member Rice made a motion to approve issuance of renewal of an On -Sale Vine
License to Mick's at Southdale, 1127 Southdale Center, subject to the conditions
as presented by staff. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Manager Rosland advised Council that staff would recommend approval of On -Sale
Wine License renewals for Rossini's Restaurant, 7373 France Avenue, and Original
Pancake House /My Pie, 3501 West 70th Street.
Member Paulus made a motion to approve issuance of On -Sale Vine License renewals
to Rossini's Restaurant and the Original Pancake House/My Pie. Motion was
seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF 3.2 BEER LICENSE FOR AMERICAN LEGION DISCUSSED:
HEARING DATE FOR NON- RENEWAL OF LICENSE SET FOR 4/4/94; BEER LICENSE RENEWALS
APPROVED FOR VARIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS Chief Bernhjelm informed Council that the
American Legion, 7070 Amundson Avenue, has applied for renewal of their 3.2 On-
Sale Beer License. Staff would recommend non - renewal of the license because
following a search of the premises all evidence supported the conclusion that the
American Legion has been serving and selling intoxicating liquor in violation of
State law and Edina Ordinances. In addition, Minnesota Liquor Control have,begun
revocation proceedings against the 3.2 Beer License held by the Legion. Attorney
Gilligan has advised that if Council wishes to proceed with the non - renewal, a
hearing must be scheduled.
Member Smith made a motion setting April 4, 1994, as hearing date for non - renewal
of the 3.2 Beer License to American Legion, 7070 Amundson Avenue. Motion was
seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Member Smith then made a motion to approve 3.2 Beer License renewals for the
following establishments: On -Sale - Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Golf Dome,
Ciatti's Italian Restaurant, Correlli's Pizza & Pasta, Dayton Food Service,
Empress Restaurant, Good Earth Restaurant, Two Guys from Italy, Hawthorn Suites
Hotel, Original Pancake House/My Pie, Pantry Restaurant, Pizzeria Uno, Q.Cumbers,
Rossini's, Ruby Tuesday, Szechuan Star Restaurant, T J's Family Restaurant, The
Lotus III, Tour Cafe; Off -Sale - Country Store, Edina Superette, Holiday
Stations, Jerry's Foods, Kenny's Market, and SuperAmerica. Motion was seconded.
by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF OUTLOT A. INDIAN HILLS VEST TO CITY
FOR VETLAND AND FLOOD CONTROL USE Engineer.Hoffman presented information and
recommendation concerning the following parcel on Hennepin County Non -
Conservation Classification List 805 -NC submitted to the City on March 7, 1994:
Indian Hills West - Outlot A (06- 116 -21 -32 -0074) The subject parcel was
declared forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non - payment of taxes on
October 7, 1993. Outlot A is a part of the development of Indian Hills West and
contains a stormwater detention pond. This pond serves as a stormwater holding
area. Staff would recommend that the City acquire the property for public
wetland and flood control purposes.
Member Rice introduced the. following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION FOR ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEIT LAND
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Clerk be
authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision for
Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property
contained in Hennepin County Non - Conservation Classification List 805 -NC, said
property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth:
Outlot A, Indian Hills Vest ( PID 06- 116 -21 -32 -0074)
Public wetland and flood control purposes.
ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1994.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING PLANS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS
RECONSTRUCTION AT VEST 58TH /FRANCE AND VEST 54TH /FRANCE Engineer Hoffman
informed the Council that Hennepin County will be reconstructing the traffic
signals at West 54th Street /France Avenue and West 58th Street /France Avenue.
Hennepin County has requested that the City approve the plans and to authorize
participation in construction of these new signals. The project agreements
specify cost sharing based on the number of entering legs into the intersection.
At the West 54th /France intersection the cost split would be 25% Minneapolis, 25%
Edina and 50% Hennepin County. The share for Edina is estimated at $20,099.00.
At the West 58th /France intersection the cost split would be 50% Edina and 50%
Hennepin County. The share for Edina is estimated at $40,710.00. These cost
splits are the standard Hennepin County policy for traffic signals.
Member Paulus introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 9008 AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND MANAGER
TO SIGN AGREEMENT NO. PV 36 -11 -92 THEREFOR
WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 9008 for reconstruction of the
traffic control signal system at the intersection of West 58th Street with County
State Aid Highway No. 17 (France Avenue) have been prepared and presented to the
City Council of Edina, Minnesota;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said plans for Hennepin County Project
No. 9008 be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and
directed to execute. Agreement No. PW 36- 11 -92, by and between the County of
Hennepin and the City of Edina, for participation in the reconstruction and
operation of said traffic control signal system.
ATTEST: Mayor Pro -Tem
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 9009 AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND MANAGER
TO SIGN AGREEMENT NO. PW 37 -11 -92 THEREFOR
WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 9009 for reconstruction of the
traffic control signal system at the intersection of West 54th Street with County
State Aid Highway No. 17 (France Avenue) have been prepared and presented to the
City Council of Edina, Minnesota;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said plans for Hennepin County Project
No. 9009 be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor Pro -Tem and Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to execute Agreement No. PW 37- 11 -92, by and between the Colnty.of
Hennepin, the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina, for participation in the
reconstruction and operation of said traffic control signal system.
ATTEST:
Mayor Pro -Tem
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolutions adopted.
CITY OF EDINA DESIGNATED LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF WETLAND
CONSERVATION ACT Engineer Hoffman reported that the Nine Mile Watershed District
has been reviewing the new permanent rules for implementation of the 1991 Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA). Their current position is that they are unable to
financially manage all the requirements of the WCA. After talking with staff at
the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources, staff would recommend that the
City of Edina act as the responsible local government Unit (LGU) under the WCA
for only that portion of the Nine Mile Creek District within the City of Edina.
The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would continue to act as the LGU for the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District within the City.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District would like to establish a joint powers
agreement with the City of Edina to work with the City on implementing the WCA
and the rules established by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil-Resources.
Member Smith asked how the additional costs to the City would be covered.
Engineer Hoffman responded that staff believes that under M.S. 462.353, Subd. 4,
the City may prescribe fees sufficient to defray the costs incurred in reviewing,
investigating and administering an application.
Member Smith made a motion that the City of Edina act as the local governmental
unit (LGU) for implementation of the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for the
portion of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District located within the City.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
UPDATE PRESENTED ON CITY'S PURCHASING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Finance Director
Wallin presented the following proposed changes in the City's purchasing
procedures:
1. Sales Tax Exemption - The sales tax exemption was lost during 1992. Section
1.14 entitled "Sales Tax Exemption" should be deleted from the policies document.
2. Records Retention - Current policy requires that written quotations be kept
for one year. The State retention schedule requires retention of claims and
purchase orders for 10 years. Proposed change would be that written quotations
be attached to the claim when submitted for payment and be retained for 10 years.
3. Authorization of Payment - City's auditors have advised that the City is not
in compliance with State law requiring Council approval of all payments prior to
checks being released. In order to receive discounts, liquor invoices must be
paid on a weekly basis. The 1993 legislature gave the City Manager authority to
approve payment of claims which would subsequently be approved by Council.
Section 1.0 "Payment Prior to Council Approval" should be amended accordingly.
4. Open Purchase Orders - City buys many products on a recurring basis during
the year. Although the exact quantity cannot be predicted accurately, experience
allows us to approximate the quantities required during a typical year. Current
policies require that if expected annual purchases exceed $15,000 a formal bid
process must be used. Due to the nature of the products being purchased, formal
bidding becomes cumbersome and has the undesirable effect of encouraging split
purchase orders. Section 1.10 a(v) should be deleted from the policies (would
eliminate the $15,000 cap) and Section 1.10 a(vii) should be amended so that once
the aggregate cost of purchase made under the open purchase order totals the "not
to exceed" amount a new open purchase order must be prepared and used. New
sections 1.10 a(ix) and 1.10 b(vii) would require at least two written quotations
on at least an annual basis for a representative cross section of products to be
purchased under the open purchase order. Each open purchase order would be used
for similar items and would be awarded to the lowest bidder.
Member Smith said, as background, it would be helpful to see the comments in the
auditor's management letter relating to purchasing. Member Rice suggested that
payment of invoices prior to Council approval for liquor inventory be capped at
some reasonable amount and that all other purchases be capped at $1,000.
Manager Rosland said staff would bring back further information and
recommendations on the purchasing policies and procedures for consideration and
action by the.Council on April 4, 1994.
REPORT GIVEN ON RICHFIELD INFORMATION MEETING CONCERNING AIRPORT 4 -22 E%TENSION
Member Smith reported that Mayor Richards and he had attended the April 10, 1994
meeting at Richfield City Hall regarding the airport 4 -22 extension. He said the
City of Richfield is in somewhat of a quandary because on one hand they do not
want the extension and on the other hand the airport is an economic entity for
Richfield. Mayor Richards had indicted that Edina's position is that the airport
is a vital asset to this area and needs to stay where it is. Member Smith said
he had suggested to the City Manager of Richfield that together with the
Metropolitan Airports Commission they look at other grant monies related to home
energy savings that may be available to help with the noise abatement program.
CLAIMS PAID Member Bice made a motion to approve payment of the following claims
as shown on the Check Register dated March 17, 1994, and consisting of 29 pages:
General Fund $185,534.80; C.D.B.B. $830.00; Communications $14,951.81; Working
Capital $9,250.57; Art Center $9,695.18; Swimming Pool $2,824.45; Golf Course
$84,423.95; Ice Arena $32,310.64; Gun Range $654.31; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes
$22,063.31; Utility Fund $31,441.58; Storm Sewer $3,064.81; Recycling $39,839.29;
Liquor Find $47,494.31; Construction Fund $1,646.09; TOTAL. $486,035.10; and for
confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown on the Check Register
dated March 11, 1994, and consisting of 14 pages: General Fund $108,281,80; Golf
Course $24,508.44; Liquor Fund $187,945.71; TOTAL $320,735.95. Motion was
seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the meeting was adjourned
by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously.
Adjournment at 11:20 P.M.
City Clerk
iy
fr/
A.
e o
• �NMNfUM'bv�
Ada•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item
II. A.
Francis Hoffma
From:
consent
C
City Engineer,
Information Only
L-1
Date: 4 April, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject: Public Hearing
To Council
Parklawn Avenue I
Roadway & Bridge
Action
g^
Motion
Improvement No.
x
Resolution
BA -303
j
Ordinance
o
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize Improvement No. BA -303, authorize plans and specifica-
tions, and approve a NO PARKING resolution for Parklawn Avenue
per state aid and design requirements.
Info /Background:
This project is the second phase of the Centennial Lakes public -
improvements. This project is triggered by the development of
the Coventry Townhomes north of Parklawn Avenue. Attached is the
public hearing notice sent to the affected property owners. You
will note that the area to be assessed for the improvements is
the Phase II development area. The project is detailed 'in the
attached report submitted by BRW, our primary consultants on
Centennial Lakes.
The funding for this project ultimately will be via assessment to
all Phase II property via an agreement. However, the initial
funding will be a combination of state aid and special assess-
ment. City Council has requested that Mn /DOT agree to place
Parklawn Avenue on the municipal state aid system. Mn /DOT has
agreed with this and as such, funding from the state would be
available for a portion of the project. The proposed special
assessment area south of W. 76th Street will be deferred until
development. At that time, the properties will pay for the
assessments and the City internally will reimburse the City state
aid construction fund.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
AGENDA ITEM II.A.
Page Two
The details of cost and schedule are within the BRW report. As
such, staff would recommend that the improvement be authorized,
plan and specifications be authorized, and a NO PARKING resolu-
tion be approved banning parking on Parklawn per state aid
requirements. -
t.,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina
CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE II - PARKLAWN AVE. ROADWAY & BRIDGE
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -303
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, April 4, 1994 at 7:00 PM,
to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority
granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements
are estimated as set forth below:
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -303 ESTIMATED COST
Parklawn Ave. Roadway $ Bridge $ 2,047,616.00
Attached Exhibit 1 is the project map showing the proposed project area and Exhibit 2 shows
the proposed assessment area.
The properties are proposed to be assessed at an estimated cost of $1.39 per square foot.
These' proposed assessments would be divided over a ten year period with interest
accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvements includes: Lots
thru 4, Block 1; Outlot A, Outlot B, and Outlot C, The Crescent at Centennial Lakes; and
Outlot E, South Edina Development Addition.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is
among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
The proposed project would be constructed in 1994/95.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may
be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented
at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between
8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the
hearing.
Thank you.
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH /clf
City Hall . (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55423 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5161
I
r
V
CENTENNIAL LAKES
MEDICAL CENTER
'°�a----- --. - ---�- TES
LEGEND
r
PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS
- - - - - --
EXISTING BACK OF CURB
PROPOSED BACK OF CURB
- - -• - --
EXISTING WATERMAIN
- - --
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
-
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
h `
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
CENTENNIAL
LAKES PLAZA
CENTENNIAL LAKES
NORTH PARK
r
NORTH �.
Paco
a � f
CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE II
PROJECT MAP
EXHIBIT I
l
1J
•f
- - -- N i ---- - - - - --
VILLAGE HOMES OF
CENTENNIAL WOES
AREA TABULATION
PARCEL A
411,596
SQ.
FT.
PARCEL E
731.499
SQ.
FT.
SOUTH PARK
330.620
SQ.
FT.
TOTAL
1,473.715
SQ.
FT.
IW
I�
U
ICI
J3L
EDINBOROUGH WAY
0
�I0
W
Z
Z_
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
- - - - -1 I
CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE lI
ASSESSMENT AREAS
EXHIRI T //
RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
S.A.P. 120 - 174 -01 FROM EDINBOROUGH WAY TO FRANCE AVENUE
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
THIS RESOLUTION, passed the 4th day of April, 1994, by the City of Edina in
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City has planned the improvement of MSAS 174 (Parklawn Avenue)
from Edinborough Way to France Avenue.
WHEREAS, the City, will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the
improvement of this Street, and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both
sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal
State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking
restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED:
That the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS
174 (Parklawn Avenue) at all times.
Dated this 4th day of April, 1994.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of April 4, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 27th day of October, 1994.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina, Minnesota
Feasibility Study and Report
for
Parklawn Avenue and Bridge
Centennial Lakes Project Phase II
City Improvement Project No. BA 303
MSA Project No. 120 -174-01
March 1994
Prepared by:
BRW, Inc.
BRW Project No. 2220A.00
#14013
I hereby certify that this report was
prepared by me or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a dul
Registered Professional En ' r der the
laws of Sta e f Minne
Date: 3/21/94 No. 8138
March 21, 1994
B R W INC. City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Attn: Mr. Fran Hoffman, PE, City Engineer
Planning
RE: Parklawn AvenuelCentennial Lakes Phase II
Transportation
City Improvement Project No. BA 303
Engineering
Urban Design
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So.
Transmitted herewith is the Feasibility Study/Report for the completion of Parklawn
Minneapolis,
Avenue in the Centennial Lakes development. This study and report has been
MN 55415
prepared in response to your request and our agreement of December 1993.
612/370 -0700
Fax 612/370 -1378
This project is a continuation of the Centennial Lakes project initiated in 1988 and
constructed in 1989. The design concepts as well as the financial/payment program
Denver
are consistent with the prior project (Phase I) and the proposals presented at that time.
Milwaukee
Minneapolis
It is our opinion that the project is feasible. It can be constructed with normal
Orlando
methods and materials at a reasonable cost. The benefits that result to adjacent
Phoenix
properties will warrant special assessments in the amount proposed herein and those
Portland
amounts are consistent with prior proposals and development agreements.
San Diego
Seattle
We will be present at the required public hearing on April 4th to assist the Council
and City staff in presenting the proposed project and to address questions regarding the
Donald W. Ringrose
project.
Richard P. Wolsfeld
Thomas F. Carroll
Sincerely,
Craig A. Amundsen
Donald E. Hunt
BRW, INC.
John B. McNamara
Richard D. Pilgrim
Dale N. Beckmann
Jeffery L. Benson
Donald W. Ringrose, PE
Ralph C. Blum
Principal
Gary J. Erickson
John C. Lynch
DWR/dc
Paul N. Bay
#14013
Sabri Ayaz
Gary A. Ehret
Anthony Heppelmann
Arijs Pakalns
Martha McPhee
Howard P. Preston
Dennis P. Probst
PARKLAWN AVENUE, CENTENNIAL LAKES (PHASE II)
I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
The Centennial Lakes Development, located between France Avenue and Edinborough Way,
north of Minnesota Street, was initiated in 1988. The 100 -acre mixed -use development was
planned to be developed in a series of phases, in response to the changes in the real estate
market. Phase I, which comprised about 50 percent of the site, included the retail, medical
office and theater development along France Avenue north of 76th Street; and the residential
component adjacent to Edinborough Way between 76th Street and Parklawn. Also included
in Phase I was the development of the Central and North ponds and the City park west of
the Central Pond. In conjunction with Phase I, the City of Edina and the Edina HRA
installed the street and utility systems required to service the Phase I development area.
These improvements included Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to the Central Pond,
76th Street and the 76th Street Bridge, Edinborough Way, major storm sewer facilities, the
North and Central Pond, sanitary sewer, water system, and the park improvements.
The infrastructure system required to serve the entire 100 -acre development was planned and
organized into logical phases that satisfied the needs for utility service and access as the
development occurred. The plan also addressed the financial aspects, funding sources, and
special assessments to the benefitting properties within the project area. Phase I was
implemented and assessed consistent with the overall plan prepared at that time.
The current expansion of the residential development north of Parklawn is in effect the
initiation of Phase II of the Centennial Lakes improvement program.
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE II)
The scope of the improvements proposed and evaluated herein is limited in comparison to
the Phase I project of 1988 /89. The current project consists of the completion of Parklawn
Avenue, beginning at its current ending point (on the west side of the pond, approximately
500 feet east of France Avenue) and extending along the curved alignment over the existing
pond to its intersection with Edinborough Way a distance of about 850 feet (see Exhibit I).
The original preliminary design for Centennial Lakes proposed that Parklawn Avenue and
76th Street both have the same basic design features, and similar if not identical details and
alignment, in general creating a symmetry in the overall design. Therefore the best way to
describe the proposed design for Parklawn Avenue is to say it will be a mirror image of 76th
Street. The components of the proposed project are:
Parklawn Avenue Roadway Improvements
• Roadway - Four -lane divided parkway (9 -ton design) (MSA standards)
• Bridge - Bridge over the pond channel utilizing the architectural details developed for
the 76th Street bridge
• Storm Sewer - Extension of existing storm sewers to the pond
• Lighting - Street and pedestrian lighting
• Landscaping - Median and boulevard landscaping with irrigation
• Walkways - Concrete sidewalk on both sides of roadway
014013 1
CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE it
PROJECT MAP
w
z
Q
W
U
z
LA-
Q
tY
LEGEN D
•
EXHIBIT I
CENTENNIAL LAKES
MEDICAL CENTER
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
WALK - --
CENTENNIAL LAKES
NORTH PARK
. y
NORTH
POND
PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING BACK OF CURB
PROPOSED BACK OF CURB
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED
BITUMINOUS
PEDESTRIAN
PATH
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
't\ WALK -..
UI4
PARKLAWN
COVENTRY
TOWNHOMES
T43 2 1
PHASE I
9�
0
0
� yo
EXISTING
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE- --
/ \
CENTENNIAL LAKES
\ CENTRAL\BARK
BITUMINOUS
PEDESTRIAN
PATH - - --
II
N
� It""--EXISTING
ii PEDESTRIAN
u PATH
0 25 e0 100
SCALE IN FEET
i
/ CONCRETE
WALK
2
O
m
i
Lol
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
WALK
1, 0 11, PrOr, 5, 01, 02,08420918Tew
VILLAGE HOMES OF
CENTENNIAL LAKES
PARK— E7770A0207C 2220A0.
Fl
1 Y
1 1
1 1
1 1
r
L�
I
I
o_ 1
I
I
I I
I � I
0 1
1 O j
1 Z I
I � I
I
I W
i•ro.0 tpu.. 700 Third 71r..1 l..u, rrt.. Iq 65411
PUNNING . TRANSPORTA710N . ENGINEERING . URBAN DESIGN
_
"
\\It
/ `
----- T-- -� - - -- �--^- =� �S t --EXISTING
`CONCRETE
A`r
"i
------- - - - - -- �, "� ,
f'
WALK
EXISTING
TRAMWAY
Ln
�G
<Q
EXISTING BUILDING
%
CENTENNIAL
LAKES PLAZA
PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING BACK OF CURB
PROPOSED BACK OF CURB
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED
BITUMINOUS
PEDESTRIAN
PATH
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
't\ WALK -..
UI4
PARKLAWN
COVENTRY
TOWNHOMES
T43 2 1
PHASE I
9�
0
0
� yo
EXISTING
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE- --
/ \
CENTENNIAL LAKES
\ CENTRAL\BARK
BITUMINOUS
PEDESTRIAN
PATH - - --
II
N
� It""--EXISTING
ii PEDESTRIAN
u PATH
0 25 e0 100
SCALE IN FEET
i
/ CONCRETE
WALK
2
O
m
i
Lol
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
WALK
1, 0 11, PrOr, 5, 01, 02,08420918Tew
VILLAGE HOMES OF
CENTENNIAL LAKES
PARK— E7770A0207C 2220A0.
Fl
1 Y
1 1
1 1
1 1
r
L�
I
I
o_ 1
I
I
I I
I � I
0 1
1 O j
1 Z I
I � I
I
I W
i•ro.0 tpu.. 700 Third 71r..1 l..u, rrt.. Iq 65411
PUNNING . TRANSPORTA710N . ENGINEERING . URBAN DESIGN
Pond and Pond Walls - Completion of the pond in the area adjacent to and under the
Parklawn bridge, including liner and walls
In addition to the basic roadway components, it is proposed to construct those elements of
the adjacent park that can be most efficiently constructed as part of the roadway project.
These components are:
Parklawn Avenue Bridge Improvements
• Grading of lawn game area south of Parklawn
• Retaining wall between Parklawn Avenue and lawn game area
• Sodding of game area
• Bituminous pathway beneath and adjacent to bridge
III. PROTECT SCHEDULE
It is proposed to construct the project during the 1994 and 1995 construction seasons. It is
anticipated that the work will be implemented as two construction contracts. The first
project will include the east end of Parklawn to provide access to the new Conventry
townhome project. The proposed schedule for each contract is as follows:
Contract I - East End of Parklawn Avenue
Design 4/15/94 - 5/15/94
Design Review and Bidding 5/15/94 - 7/1/94
Construction 7/15/94 - 9/1/95
Contract II - Bridge, Roadway, Landscape and Park Development
Design 4/15/94 - 7/15/94
Review and Bidding 7/15/94 - 9/15/94
Construction 10/1/94 - 9/1/95
IV. PROTECT COST AND FUNDING
The estimated cost of the proposed improvements is summarized below. (Detailed quantity
and cost schedules are provided in Exhibit III.)
Component
Construction
Cost
Fees /Admin.
Interest (279/6)
Total Estimated
Project Cost
Roadway
$265,498
$71,684
$337,182
Landscape /Lighting /Walks
257,544
69,537
327,081
Bridge
1,048,777
283,170
1,331,947
Park /Pond
62,212
16,797
79,009
Total
$1,634,031
$441,188
$2,075,219
#14013 3
The 27 percent allocation for project overhead includes an estimate of:
171/6 Design and Construction Fees
5% Interest
5% Administrative Fees
270
The estimated costs are based upon the prior cost experience from Phase I for the same type
of work, adjusted to reflect the overall trends of construction costs over the past four years.
The project is proposed to be funded by a combination of special assessments and Municipal
State Aid. The City will designate Parklawn Avenue as a Municipal State Aid street and it
will then be eligible for the use of MSA funds. MSA funds will pay for the basic
transportation components of the project and other components that are required in order to
implement the roadway system. An estimate of the eligible MSA funding is as follows.
(This includes an allocation of 18 percent for engineering fees.)
Element
• Roadway /Drainage
• Sidewalk
• Street Lighting
• Bridge
Total Eligible MSA Funds*
Estimated MSA Funds
* Subject to Mn /DOT review and approval.
$ 313,000
40,000
66,000
1,060,000
$1,479,000
While the project may be eligible for MSA funding to the extent of approximately $1,479,000,
the City may not have that amount available in its MSA account or the City may not choose
to use MSA funding to the maximum extent available. To the extent that MSA funds are
used, it is the intent that the MSA funds would be recovered by future project- generated
funds (tax increment funds).
Special assessments are the primary funding method proposed for this project. As stated
previously, the original planning for Centennial Lakes included a financial program and
agreement which defined which parcels would be assessed with the various project phases.
Based on the agreements for the planning of Centennial Lakes, the parcels that are to be
assessed for the current project (Phase II) are: Parcel A —the total area included in the
residential development (north of Parklawn), parcel E —south of 76th Street on both sides of
the south park, and the south park area. (See Exhibit II for the location and size of the
proposed assessment parcels.)
The assessment parcel areas are as follows:
Parcel
Area ( sq.ft.)
Area (acres)
A
411,596 sq.ft.
9.45 acres
E
731,499 sq.ft.
11.45 acres
South Park
330,620 sq.ft.
7.59 acres
Total
1,473,715 sq.ft.
33.83 acres
#14013 4
AREA TABULATION
PARCEL A
411,596
SQ.
FT.
PARCEL E
731,499
SQ.
FT.
SOUTH PARK
330,620
SQ.
FT.
TOTAL
.1,473,715
SQ.,FT.
IW
I�
f5
I^ I
�; L_ EDINBOROUGH WAY
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
CENTENNIAL LAKES 'PHA SE 11
ASSESSMENT AREAS
EXHIBIT //
1
rI0
�I
z
z
Based on the projected project cost and upon the prior agreements for the Centennial Lakes
funding (at the time of Phase I), it is proposed to assess the full cost of the project to the
properties previously identified. MSA funds are to be used as a financing method and are to
be repaid by assessments and other project - generated funds (tax increment funds).
The resulting estimated assessment rate is:
Total Project Cost: $2,085,219
Total Assessable Area: 1,473,715 sq.ft.
Assessment Rate: $2,075,219 _ 1,473,715 sq.ft. _ $1.4081 /sq.ft.
Based on the estimated assessment rate, an assumed 6 percent interest, and on an assessment
period of 10 years, the total assessment and average annual payment for each of the three
parcels to be assessed is presented in the following table.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT BASED ON $1.4081/SF RATE, 6 %, AND 10 YEARS
#14013 6
Total
Average
Assessment
Assessment
Interest
Period
Annual
Parcel
Area
Rate /sq.ft.
Amount
Rate
(years)
Payment
A
411,596 sf
$1.4081
$579,568
6%
10
P $ 57,957
I 17,387
T $ 75,344
E
731,499 sf
$1.4081
$1,030,023
6%
10
P $103,002
I 30,901
T $133,903
South
330,620 sf
$1.4081
$465,546
6%
10
P $ 46,555
Park
I 13,966
T $ 60,521
#14013 6
EXHIBIT III
Detailed Quantity and Construction Cost Schedule
Roadway Improvements
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Amount
Misc. Removals
1
LS
$10,000
$10,000
Remove Existing Curb and Gutter
100
LF
$5
$500
Sawcut Existing Bituminous Pavement
120
LF
$5
$600
Erosion Control Fence
2000
LF
$3
$6,000
Rock Filter Dike
2
EA
$2,000
$4,000
Common Excavation
1000
CY
$6
$6,000
Finish Grading
2
AC
$2,000
$4,000
Seed
1
AC
$1,000
$1,000
Subgrade Preparation
820
LF
$6
$4,920
"Parkway" Concrete Curb and Gutter
3280
LF
$8
$26,240
8" Aggregate Base CL 5
2550
TON
$8
$20,400
2W' Bituminous Base Course
710
TON
$25
$17,750
1W" Bituminous Wear Course
425
TON
$29
$12,325
Adjust Castings
8
EA
$200
$1,600
Tack Coat
250
GAL
$2
$500
Pedestrian Ramps
4
EA
$500
$2,000
Sod
3800
SY
$2
$7,600
Signage and Striping
1640
LF
$3
$4,920
Remove Bulkhead /Connect to Existing Stub
2
EA
$500
$1,000
24" RCP CL 3
30
LF
$40
$1,200
15" RCP CL 3
70
LF
$30
$2,100
CB
6
EA
$1,000
$6,000
Bedding
100
TON
$12
$1,200
Retaining Wall (8' above grade)
300
LF
$220
$66,000
Safety Railing
300
LF
$150
$45,000
Subtotal $252,855
Contingencies (5 1/6) $12,643
Total Estimated Construction Cost $265,498
#14013
EXHIBIT III
Detailed Quantity and Construction Cost Schedule
(Continued)
IL Landscaping /Lighting /Walkways
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Amount
Green Ash
82
EA
$500
$41,000
Charles Albanel Rose -
1,990
EA
$30
$59,700
Mint Julep Juniper
320
EA
$30
$9,600
Sod
1,600
SY
$3
$4,800
Irrigation
1
LS
$15,000
$15,000
4" Concrete Colored Walls
12,360
SF
$3.50
$43,260
4" Concrete Colored Median Apron
3,120
SF
$3.50
$10,920
Street Lights (single head)
14
EA
$4,000
$56,000
Lighting Controls
1
IS
$5,000
$5,000
Subtotal $245,280
Contingencies (5 %) $12,264
Total Estimated Construction Cost $257,544
#19013
III. Bridge
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Amount
Bridge Structure
8213
SF
$95
$780,235
Bridge Light (decorative quad)
10
EA
$10,000
$100,000
Bridge Light (button for post)
34
EA
$600
$20,400
Pond Dewatering, Pond Liner
Modification
1
IS
$30,000
$30,000
Pond Retaining Wall (Colored)
160
LF
$150
$24,000
Pond Edge Treatment (Rip -Rap)
160
LF
$50
$8,000
Safety Railing
140
LF
$150
$21,000
Bridge Stairs (1 Stair)
400
SF
$30
$12,000
Stairway Railing (1 Stair)
40
LF
$80
$3,200
Subtotal $998,835
Contingencies (5 %) $49,942
Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,048,777
#14013
EXHIBIT III
Detailed Quantity and Construction Cost Schedule
(Continued)
IV.. Park Improvements and Pond Modifications
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Amount
Bituminous Walkway
7,000
SF
$1.75
$12,250
Common Excavation (game area)
5000
CY
$6
$30,000
Irrigation Modification
1
LS
$5,000
$5,000
Sod
8000
SY
$1.50
$12,000
Subtotal $59,250
Contingencies (5 %) $2,962
Total Estimated Construction Cost $62,212
sigma 10
f.
e>
Cn
•
RPM"' O/
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: April 4, 1994
Subject: S-93-6, Preliminary
Plat Approval, Holly
Hill Estates. 5_020
Blake _Road. John
Zwicke . -- ---- -- -
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #=.
A
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Preliminary plat approval conditioned on:
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Subdivision Dedication
3. Supplemental assessment of $2,400 to be paid at Final Plat
approval.
4. Utility connection charges
INFOIBACKGROUND
This item was continued by the Council at their March 7, 1994,
meeting. The hearing was continued to allow the proponent time to
address the safety of the driveways and the Blake Road assessment.
Attached is the proponents letter addressing these issues.
To: Mayor and Edina City Council
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
This letter is in response to issues raised at the initial
meeting addressing the purposed subdivision of 5020 Blake
Road.
1) Driveway Saftey; this issue was originally brought up by
myself when the project to. widen and rebuild Blake Road
was purposed in the fall of 1991. Originally it was
purposed to widen the road from approx 28' to 321. I
pointed out to the city engineer and council that
significant widening of the road would increase the slope
of my driveways and reduce the level stopping space at the
ends of my driveways making them less safe. The road
width finally implemented along my property was retained
at 28 feet and the curve along my north driveway was also
made more gradual improving visibility and actually
resulting in extending the north side of my driveway by 2.
feet. The final result of road reconstruction was to make
my driveways more safe and I do not consider either to be
hazardous.
2) Road assessment reduction; my lot was given a reduction in
its frontage assessment for Blake Road improvements do to
its irregular 3 sided nature causing it to have an
unusually long frontage of 391 feet. The northerly 180
feet were treated as a side frontage reducing the total
assessment from $7800 to $5400. At that time and until
the time this property is subdivided and becomes two
separate homesteads, I feel this is a fair and legitimate
reduction. Although at the time this property becomes two
buildable homesteads, I feel the full value added for road
improvements should b,e recognized and I would agree to pay
the additional $2400 at that time through higher
connection fees or lot dedication tax.
Sincerely,
J2 cke
BURG.
�.I
LOCATION MAP
e
9
C
°s r, � • .eft+
MT f R LAC M
HAIROLD
i a
i
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER
S -94 -1
L O
C
A T 10 N
5020 Blake Road
REQUEST
Create One New Lot
5 1 VOT,
&W a m
J
.._- F-.DINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
\'" �'• T '��• Ye..w.... /ITlJU1NOUS 4o•DWAY/ tti /-.�L/ ' •
�' �r •n•'• � fit•
nt • -
90.0 930
• � ��� t I o�� fir,, �� � �
_,{• NorE. Mow.,. rjftf \ 10 �� �•. {I� .•... �•�• v, .Lt •...
vvc
s
f •�
y r'
wl
r''.�
Aftv _ P,.Ws
, , i ISO
%: • •fie` Qom- • ,•, O Sag SQ FT Ir
�r ,�• i! - (.4 � j ��
rte. � �'oJM � I�,{ ��.tf� =� �• ..•f _.. � i
ko
.•
Agenda Item IV. A.-
(Please refer to Agenda Item VI.A.)
The Nail Techs of Edina
Helen. Bair
7600 Parklawn Avenue,
Suite 1_30
Edina, MN 55435
— March 28,)"1994
City of Edina
4801- West ,50t,h Street
Edina, MN 55424
Edina City Council:
I am a small salon owner in Edina and wish to have an independent
massage therapist rent space from me. As I understand, the
current Edina ordinance prohibits this sort of agreement.
I would like to request that this matter be put on the agenda for
the next City Council meeting.
The purpose would be to allow small business owners, like myself,
to offer an array of services to their clients as well as offer
a massage therapist an opportunity to make a living.
Sincerely,
Helen Bair
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
:�t7t''
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosiand City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE. 4 April, 1994 AGENDA ITEM V.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Improvements to Valley View Road
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
i
1. See Attached Tabulation 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Midwest Asphalt $ 1,370,320.33
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the bid for road and storm sewer improvements
to Valley View Road and W. 66th Street area. This project
will be funded by state aid, special assessment and
stormwater utility funds.
n
Public Works - Engineering
Si atur, . _ Depart nt
r k The Recommended bid is -- --
within budget not withp but ry Waflin. A ance Director
Kenneth Rosland City
BID TABULATION - 3130194
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT 94 -2
Improvement Nos. BA -293, BA -299 & STS -219
Valley View Rd. - France Avenue to W. 65th St. &
W. 66th St. - France Ave. to Southdale Rd.
PLANHOLDER
TOTAL BID
CONTRACT
94 -2
Midwest Asphalt, Inc.
$1,370,320.33
Palda & Sons, Inc.
$1,419,932.53
Hardrives, Inc.
$1,494,328.90
McNamara Contracting, Inc.
$1,511,960.33
Arnt Construction, Inc.
$1,519,204.06
*C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.
$1,547,080.80
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.
$1,552,960.75
G.L. Contracting, Inc.
$1,593,309.04
Valley Paving, Inc.
$1,605,619.64
Engineer's Estimate
$1,669,185.60
*Bid Rejected, Addendum No. 1 Not Acknowledged
e
n a REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 4 April, 1994
AGENDA ITEM V. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete &
Company Engine oil Amount of Quote or Bid
1. See Attached Tabulation 1
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Award to companies as listed on attached sheet.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the bid establishing the prices for certain materials used in
public works projects. The prices are firm-for a period of one year
(April 1, 1994 to April 1, 1995). The funds for the purchases come
from the money allocated to the operating section of the budget (300
& 560 accounts).
Sign ure
The Recommended bid is
Public Works
x
within budget not within,,&go
Kenneth Rosland
Manager
s'
..
SAND, ROCK., BITUMINOUS MATERIALS, CONCRETE, PROPANE .Z... ENGINE O[L
LOW BID .
COMPARATIVE
UNIT
ITEM:
COMPANY
1994
1993:
1993/1994
CHANGE OF °"
- ;..
+ -OR
Ton
Delivered
SA -AG, Inc.
3.35
3.28
+ 2.1%
Sand
Ton
Delivered
Prior Lake Aggregates
10.83
10.40
+ 4.1%
Buck Shot
Ton
Delivered
Edward Kraemer & Son
5.08
5.40
- 5.9%
Cl. 2
Limestone
Ton
Delivered
Recommend No Award
5.86
Not Bid
- --
CI. 5
in 1993
Limestone
Ton
Delivered
On Hold For Test Results
- --
- --
- --
Seal Coat
of Spec. Testing
Chips
Ton*
Picked Up
Midwest Asphalt
17.45
17.20
+ 1.5%
At Plant
Asphalt
2331
Ton*
2331 Fine
Midwest Asphalt
18.25
17.70
+ 3.0%
Asphalt
Ton*
2331 Type
Bituminous Roadways
17.25
18.50
- 6.8%
41 B/42B
Asphalt
Ton*
2331 Fine
Midwest Asphalt
18.25
Not Bid
- --
3/8 Patch
in 1993
Mix Asphalt
Ton
Winter Mix
Midwest Asphalt
45.00
45.00
0
Asphalt
CY
Delivered
AVR, Inc.
54.00
50.50
+ 6.9%
Concrete 1-
3 Yds.
CY
Delivered
AVR, Inc.
75.00
N/A
N/A
Concrete
3+ Yds.
SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS :MATERIALS; CONCRETE, PROPANE & ENGINE:OIL
LOW. BID
COMPARATIVE
-;
UNIT
ITEM
COMPANY
199.4
1993
1993J1994
CHANGE:,: :OF PC
+OR-
Gal.
Cut Back
Koch Refinery
.7748
.7748
0
Asphalt
Delivered
Gal.
Alternate
Koch Refinery
.4928
.4828
+ 2.0%
Cut Back
Asphalt
CRS2
Ton **
Recycling/
Bituminous Roadways/
1.00/
Not Bid
- --
Dumping
Midwest Asphalt
1.50
in 1993
Charges -
Asphalt
Ton
Recycling/
Midwest Asphalt
1.50
Not Bid
- --
Dumping
in 1993
Charges -
Concrete
Propane LP
No Bid
- --
Not Bid
in 1993
Gal.
Engine Oil
Hallman Oil
3.37
Not Bid
--
15/40
in 1993
Gal.
Engine Oil
Hallman Oil
3.69
Not Bid
--
40W
in 1993
Gal.
Engine Oil
Hallman Oil
3.05
Not Bid
---
5W/30
in 1993
Gal.
Engine Oil
Hallman Oil
3.75
Not Bid
---
Hyd. Tellus
in 1993
T46
Gal.
Engine Oil
Hallman Oil
3.79
Not Bid
---
ATF-Donox
in 1993
TG
*These items are awarded on basis of total cost per ton including trucking and labor. Award to
Midwest and Bituminous Roadways on bid items with an alternate award to either firm if low bid
asphalt plant is down when we need asphalt.
* *Award to both locations as we would truck recycling materials to plants when we are picking up
new asphalt at designated low bid plant.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: - Kenneth Rosiand City Manager -
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 4 April, 1994 AGENDA ITEM V. C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Water Treatment
Chemicals
Company
Amount of Quote or &d
I1. See Attached Tabulation
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5. .
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Award to companies as listed on
attached sheet.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid establishes the annual price for
water treatment chemicals used
in wells and swimming pools in the City.
These chemicals are: hydro -
fluosilicic acid, liquid chlorine, caustic
soda, and diatomaceous earth,
and will be purchased as needed. These prices
will be valid until
March 31, 1995.
Public Works - Utilities
Si natde� "
The Recommended bid is —
within budget not
Kenneth Rostarid City
Director
CHEMICALS
LOW;BID >:
COMPARATIVE:
ITEM
COMPANY _
1994
1993
1993/1994>
CHANGE OF %..
+ OR' -
*Water Treatment
Hawkins Chemical
38.53
32.75
+17.6%
Chemicals for City
Wells
Caustic Soda
DPC Industries/
.98
1.80
-45.5%
Hawkins Chemical (Tied Bid)
Diatomaceous Earth
Van Waters & Rogers
9.75
9.50
+ 2.7%
*Includes Super Fund & Sales Tax
U N' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: March 24, 1994
AGENDA ITEM V. D .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Art Center class schedule: brochures
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1• Jerry's Printing 1. $5,450
2• Sir Speedey 2. $6,440
3• American Speedy Printers 3. $5,475
4• Alpha Graphics 4. $6,725
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Jerry's Printing $5,450
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Informationalbrochures for young people and adult classes:
12000 young people schedules, folded
6000 adult schedules, folded
ignature
The Recommended bid is
within budget no
�C� F �2cC pae11�
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members
FROM: Susan k'ohlrabe
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE. April 4, 1994
AGENDA ITEM V. E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Change order /Power Assisted Door openers- City Hall
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Brin Northwestern Glass Company 1.$2,990.00
2. 2.
3. 3
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Brin - $2,990.00
GENERAL INFORMATION: This amount is over ten percent of the contract
which totals $9,890.00; therefore, this additional amount of $2,990.00
warrants your approval. The total amount of the contract will therefore
be $12,880.00 which is reimbursable per the Hennepin.County Community
Development Block Grant Program.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
y —
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland City
Director
ci
'fit
vwv
�I
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda item #
VI. A.
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
Information Only
F7
Date: APRIL 4, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
T
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
MASSAGE ORDINANCE
,
REQUIREMENTS
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Grant first reading to Ordinance No. 1994 -5.
Info / Background
On March 7, 1994, the City Council received a letter from Mitchell Wherley, who is the
owner of Spalon Montage. Mr. Wherley noted that Section 1340 of the City Code provides
that not more than two individuals may perform massage at any one time on a business
premises. Mr. Wherley asked that this provision be repealed noting that the City Code
provides other requirements which limit the size of a massage business. The City Council
directed staff to review the Code and recommend changes if warranted.
Attached is a memorandum from Lieutenant Vince Bongaarts concerning Mr. Wherley's
proposed revision. As directed by the City Council, Lieutenant Bongaarts has surveyed
surrounding communities concerning their massage ordinances. Based upon that survey, and
the police department's experience in enforcing the Code, Lieutenant Bongaarts
recommends that the Code be amended to eliminate the restriction on the maximum
number of individuals that could practice at any one. time.
Report/Recommendation - MASSAGE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
April 4, 1994
Page two
Based upon the police department recommendation, staff has prepared Ordinance No. 1994-
5 (a copy of the entire Code relative to massage is attached for your reference). Section 1
of this Ordinance repeals the provision with respect to the maximum number of individuals
that may perform massage. The other sections of this Ordinance provide corrections and
clarifications to the Code that have been identified since the 1991 recodification. In
particular, Section 4 of the Ordinance Amendment revises the definitions of "massage" and
"sauna parlor ". Under the existing definition, "massage" could be interpreted to include
treatments of chiropractors and other licensed professionals. The revised definition exempts
these professionals from the requirements of the Code. Under the present definition, "sauna
parlor" could be construed to include any establishment which- contained a sauna or a steam
room. Under this definition, establishments such as the YMCA or health clubs could be
deemed "sauna parlors ". The new definition clarifies that such establishments where saunas
or steam rooms are an accessory use are not "sauna parlors" under the definition of the
Code.
The City recently received a letter from Helen Bair, which addresses other issues with
respect to the Code. The current Code provides that. no person may operate a massage
parlor in connection with any other operation or business, unless the massage parlor is
licensed as a business under Section 1340 of the Code. Ms. Bair wishes to contract with an
independent massage therapist who will presumably provide massage within Ms. Bair's
business at 7600 Parklawn Avenue. Under the current Code, this massage therapist would
have to obtain a business license. (If the therapist was an employee of Ms. Bair rather than
an independent contractor, the therapist would be eligible for an individual license and could
practice massage in this location as long as massage revenues 'did not exceed 25 percent of
Ms. Bair's total revenues.) Such a license can only be granted for properties within the
Regional Medical District. In that 7600 Parklawn is not . within the Regional Medical
District, the issuance of a license is not possible. In that the staff has only recently received
this correspondence, we have not addressed this issue in Ordinance No. 1994 -5. If the City
Council wishes to consider a change in this requirement, staff can respond at a future
meeting.
GLH /dr
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 15, 1994
Chief Bernhjelm
Lt. Bongaarts
CITY OF EDINA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Mitchell Wherley is requesting that we eliminate paragraph "C' of Ordinance 1340.02,
Subd. 3. Paragraph C stipulates that no more than two persons can perform massage at
any one time on the business premises. He feels that paragraph D would suffice as the
policing requirement for massage business in Edina.
It would appear that we could indeed eliminate paragraph C. There would be no
conflicts with the rest of the ordinance and there appears to be no conflict or problems
with Ordinance 1345, Sexually- Oriented Businesses. In fact, ,Ordinance 1345.07, subd. 5,
does not allow any business, etc., using those that do massages on their premises to make
application for a sexually- oriented business.
Also, paragraph D of 1340.02, subd. 3, does limit the amount of business that can be
generated by someone performing massage in a business establishment.
In checking with the surrounding communities reference this situation, I found the
following:
Hopkins: Doesn't license persons or businesses in regard to massage.
Bloomington: Has no restrictions as to how many may perform massage.
Minnetonka: Has no restrictions regarding number.
St. Louis Park: Has no restrictions regarding number.
Eden Prairie: Doesn't license in regard to massage.
Richfield: Doesn't restrict numbers, however, their initial application and
investigative fees are so high that no one applies for a license.
In conclusion, I can find no reason we should restrict the number to two at one time as
long as we retain paragraph D (1340.02, subd. 3, paragraph D).
VJB:nah
ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1340 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PROVIDE NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR PHYSICAL CULTURE AND
HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS AND INDIVIDUALS
PERFORMING MASSAGE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph C of Subdivision 3 of Subsection 1340.02 of Section 1340 of
the City Code is repealed.
Section 2. Subdivision 5 of Subsection 1340.14 of Section 1340 of the City Code
is amended to read as follows:
"Subd. 5. Services Only Allowed at Business. No person shall perform a massage
for a fee or other consideration at any place other than (i) a physical culture and
health service, physical culture or health club, reducing salon, sauna parlor, or
massage parlor that has been duly licensed pursuant to Subd. 2 of Subsection
1340.02 or, (ii) a. business which is exempt from a business license pursuant to
Subd. 3 of Subsection 1340.02."
Section 3. Subsection 1340.14 of Section 1340 of the City Code is amended by
adding a new Subd. 7 as follows:
"Subd. 7. No Services Allowed'at Sexually Oriented Businesses. No person shall
perform a massage for a fee or other consideration at a Sexually Oriented Business
as defined by Subsection 850.03 of this Code."
Section 4. Subsection 1340.01 of Section 1340 of the City Code is amended by
providing a new definition for the following terms:
"Massage. The rubbing, pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping, rolling, pounding,
vibrating, or stimulating the superficial parts of the human body with hands or any
instrument by a person who is not duly licensed by the State to practice medicine,
surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry.
Sauna Parlor. An establishment or business the principal use of which is the
provision of a room or rooms used by the public for bathing, relaxing, or reducing
purposes utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent."
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.02
Section 1340 - Physical Culture and Health Services and Clubs
1340.01 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise clearly indicates, the following terms
shall have the stated meanings:
Escort Service. Any business which provides male or female accompaniment
services to its customers for a fee or other valuable consideration.
Massage. The rubbing, pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping, rolling, pounding,
vibrating, or stimulating the superficial parts of the human body with the hands or
any instrument.
"Physical Culture and Health Services," "Physical Culture and Health Club,"
"Reducing Club," "Reducing Salon," "Massage Parlor." Any building, room, structure,
place, or establishment used by the public other than a hospital, sanitarium, rest
home, nursing home, boarding home or other institution for the hospitalization or
care of human beings, duly licensed under the provisions of M.S. 144.50 through
144.703, inclusive, where non - medical and non - surgical manipulative exercises or
massages are practiced upon the human body for a fee or other valuable
consideration by anyone not duly licensed by the State to practice medicine, surgery,
osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry, with or without the use of
mechanical, therapeutic, or bathing devices.
Sauna Parlor. Any building, room, structure, place or establishment containing a
room or rooms used by the public for bathing, relaxing or reducing purposes
utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent.
1340.02 Business License Required.
Subd. 1 Limiting Business Licenses. It is found and determined that the type of
business activity subject to being licensed under this Section is particularly subject
to abuse which may take a number of,forms contrary to the morals, health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Further, it is found that control of these
abuses requires intensive efforts of the Police Department as well as other
departments of the City. These efforts exceed those required to control and regulate
other business activities licensed by the City. This concentrated use of City services
tends to detract from and reduce the level of service available to the rest of the
community and thereby diminishes the ability of the City to promote the general
health, welfare, morals and safety of the community. Therefore, the number of
business licenses which may be in force under this Section at any one time shall not
exceed four.
Subd. 2 Requiring License and Defining Businesses Operating within City. No
person, partnership, corporation, or other organization shall operate a physical
1340 - 1
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.04
culture and health service or club, reducing club or salon, sauna parlor, massage
parlor, or escort service within the City, either exclusively or in connection with any
other operation or enterprise, unless such business is currently licensed under this
Section. A business is operating within the City, regardless of whether the business
premises are actually located within the corporate limits of the City, if the business
premises serve as a point of assignment for employees who perform services within
the corporate limits of the City, including, but not limited to, telephone referral
business.
Subd. 3 Restrictions of Business. The preceding provisions of this Section
notwithstanding, no physical culture and health service, physical culture and health
club, reducing club, reducing salon, or massage parlor shall be required to obtain
a business license under this Section if it meets all of the following criteria 'as
evidenced by affidavits and other documents, including that set out at paragraph D.
of this Subd. 3, submitted to and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to
the Clerk:
A. The principal activity of the business shall not be the performance of
massage;
B. The activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business
premises;
C. No more than two persons licensed to perform massage under this Section
shall perform such massage at any one time on the business premises;
D. The annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage is less
than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by
financial statements or certifications of the kind specified in paragraph J. of
Subd. 1 of Subsection 1340.04; and
E. All individuals performing massage or escort services in connection with the
business are duly licensed in accordance with Subsection 1340.03.
1340.03 Individual License Required. No person shall perform massage or escort services
within the City for a fee or other valuable consideration unless currently licensed under this
Section. The licensee shall carry and display on request of any police officer a valid license
while within the City.
1340.04 License Application and Procedures. Every application for a license under this
Section shall be made on a form supplied by the Clerk and shall be filed with the Clerk.
The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this
Section and to the holders of such licenses. In addition to the information required by
Section 160 of this Code, the application for a license under this Section shall contain the
following information. Failure to complete or supply such information may cause a license
1340 -2
City of Edina
to be denied.
Subd. 1 Business License:
Trades and Occupations 1340.04
A. Whether the applicant is a natural person, a partnership, a corporation,
or other form of organization.
B. If the applicant is a natural person:
1. The true name, place and date of birth, current address and
telephone number of the applicant.
2. Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a
name other than the applicant's true name; and if so, such name or
names and information concerning dates and places where used.
3. A specific statement as to the type and nature of the business to
be licensed.
4. The name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a name
other than the full individual name of the applicant, in which case a
certified copy of the certification required by M.S. Chapter 333, shall
be attached to the application.
S. The addresses. at which the applicant has lived during the previous
five years, including a statement of how long the applicant has beer'
continuously a resident of the State during the period as of and
immediately preceding the date of application.
6. The kind, name and location of every business or occupation in
which the applicant has been engaged during the preceding five years.
7. The names and addresses of the applicant's employer(s) and
partner(s), if any, who were such at any time during the preceding
five years.
8. The applicant's educational qualifications, including originals or
certified copies of degrees, diplomas or certificates, if any.
9. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any felony,
crime, or violation of any provisions of this Code or State Law other
than traffic violations and, if so, information as to the time, place and
offense for which convictions were had.
10. A physical description of the applicant and a recent photograph
1340 -3
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.04
of the applicant showing both front and side views.
11. A statement of the training and experience possessed by the
applicant related to the operation and affairs of the business to be
licensed.
C. If the applicant is a partnership:
1. The names and addresses of all partners and all information
concerning each partner as is required of an applicant under
paragraph B. of Subd. 1 of this Subsection.
2. The names(s) of the managing partner(s), and the interest of each
partner in the business.
3. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with
the application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as
to trade name under the provisions of M.S. Chapter 333, a certified
copy of such certification shall also be attached.
D. , If the applicant is a corporation or other organization.
1. The name of the applicant, and if incorporated, the state of
incorporation.
2. A true Certificate of Good Standing, dated as of a current date,
and true copies of the Articles of Incorporation or Association
Agreement and Bylaws shall be attached to the application. If a
foreign corporation, a Certificate of Authority issued pursuant to M.S.
Chapter 303, shall also be attached.
3. The name of the person(s) who is to manage the business and all
information concerning the person(s) as is required of an applicant
under paragraph B. of Subd. 1 of this Subsection.
4. The names of all officers, directors and persons who control or
own an interest in excess of S% in such corporation or organization
and all information concerning the persons as is required of an
applicant under paragraph B. of Subd. 1 of this Subsection.
E. The location of the business premises.
F. Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities or has had a
license revoked, or has been denied a license, to conduct any of the activities
required to be licensed hereunder; and if so, when and where the applicant
1340-4
City of Edina Trades and Occupations 1340.05
is or was so licensed, has had a license revoked or has been denied a license.
G. The names and addresses of those individuals to be licensed and
employed by the applicant and who may work within the City.
H. The names, residences and business addresses of three residents of the
County, not related to the applicant or financially interested in the business
to be licensed, who may be referred to by the City for information as to the
applicant's character. If the applicant is a partnership, three such names
shall be supplied for each partner, and if the applicant is a corporation or
other organization, three such names shall be supplied for each officer of the
applicant and each manager of the business.
I. The amount of capital investment to be made by the applicant in the
premises described in the application to operate the business to be licensed.
Capital investment shall mean the amount of money that the applicant
actually invests to acquire, refurbish, repair, remodel, or furnish the premises,
including moneys invested to comply with Subsection 1340.15. This
paragraph shall not apply to any applicant for a license to operate only an
escort service.
J. A Financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an
independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be
licensed for the last three fiscal years of such business, or shorter period of
time that the applicant may have been in the business to be licensed,
itemized as to each activity of the business including, without limitation, the
gross income from performing massage. In lieu of delivery of the financial
statement, the applicant may deliver a certification by a certified public
accountant, acceptable to the Manager, that the annual gross revenue for the
same period of time as is required for the financial statement of the business
from massage services is less than 25% of its total annual gross revenue for
such period of time, with each year considered separately.
Subd. 2 Individual License. All the information required under paragraphs B., F.
and H. of Subd. 1 of this Subsection together with the name and location of any
business by which the applicant will be employed together with current affidavits
and other documents required by Subd. 3 of Subsection 1340.02 shall be required
of applicants for an individual license.
1340.05 Execution of Application. All applications for any license under this Section
shall be signed and verified by the oath of the applicant. If the application is that of a
natural person, it shall be signed and verified by such person; if by a partnership, by all the
partners; if by a corporation, by two of its officers, and if by an unincorporated association,
by its manager or managing officer. Any falsification of information on any license
application shall result in the denial of the license applied for, and shall constitute adequate
1340 -5
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.08
grounds for the suspension or revocation of any license issued to the applicant.
1340.06 License and Investigation Fees.
Subd. 1 License Fee. Each application for a license or renewal license shall be
accompanied by payment in full of the required license fee. The fee for an
individual license and fee for a business license shall be as set forth in Section 185
of this Code. Upon rejection of any application for a license, the Clerk shall refund
the amount paid.
Subd. 2 Investigation Fee. . At the time of each original application for an
individual license, or for a business license, the applicant shall deposit an
investigation fee as set forth in Section 185 of this Code. The cost of the
investigation will be based on the expense involved. All deposit monies not
expended on the investigation will be refunded to the applicant.
1340.07 Investigation. All applications shall be referred by the Clerk to the Police
Department and to such other City departments for investigation of the applicant's
character and verification of the facts set forth in the application. Within 60 days after the
application date, the Police Chief and any other consultants shall submit a written
recommendation to the Manager as to issuance or non- issuance of the license, setting forth
the facts upon which the recommendation is based.
1340.08 Approval or Denial of Application. Within 90 days after the application date,
the Manager shall either approve or deny the application and shall notify the Clerk in
writing of the decision. If the application is approved, the Clerk shall issue the license.
If the application is denied, the Clerk shall furnish written notice of the denial to the
applicant, together with the reason or reasons for denial. In addition to the reasons set
forth in Subsection 160.04 of this Code a license may also be denied for any of the
following reasons:
Subd. 1 Under Legal Age. If an individual applicant is under the age of 18.
Subd. 2 Convictions. If the applicant, or any officers, managers, directors,
shareholders or owners, 'if a corporation or association, or any partners, if a
partnership, has been convicted of a felony, or has been convicted of any illegal
conduct involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
Subd. 3 Conviction without Sufficient Rehabilitation. If the applicant, or any
principal officers, managers, directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or
association, or any. partners, if a partnership, has been convicted of any crime or
crimes directly relating to the occupation of massage and escort services, as provided
in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not shown competent evidence of sufficient
rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties of the occupation of massage
or escort services, as provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 3.
1340-6
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.09
Subd. 4 Prior Denial of License. If the applicant, or any principal. officers,
managers, directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or association, or any
partners, if a partnership, has within one year prior to the date of application been
denied a license under this Section, or any similar ordinance of any municipality
within the State, or within the period has had revoked any license issued under this
Section, or any similar ordinance of any municipality within the State.
Subd. 5 Zoning Restriction. If the business to be licensed is not permitted by
Section 850 of this Code upon the premises described in the application.
Subd. 6 Failure to Meet Construction Requirements. If the premises described in
the application for a business license fail to comply with the requirements of
Subsection 1340.15.
Subd. 7 Capital Investment Less than $10,000. If the applicant's planned capital
investment in the premises described in the application to operate the business to
be licensed is less than $10,000. This paragraph shall not apply to any license
application to operate only an escort service.
Subd. 8 Training Requirements. If the individual applicant for a license to
practice massage has not (i) had at least two years' actual training and experience
in practicing massage, or (ii) received at least one year of training in practicing
massage from a school classified and conducted as a post secondary vocational
education school by the State Board of Technical Colleges pursuant to M.S. Chapter
136C, or (iii) received at least one year of training in practicing massage from a
school approved by the State Higher Education Coordinating Board pursuant to M.S.
Chapter 136A, or (iv) received at least one year of training in practicing massage
from a school within or without the State' meeting the standards of those schools
approved as provided in (ii) and (iii) in this Subdivision.
Subd. 9 Six -Month Residency Requirement. If the individual applicant has not
been a resident of Minnesota continuously for at 'least the six-month period
immediately preceding the application date.
Subd. 10 Regional Medical District Requirement. If the application is for a
business license to perform massage, and if the business premises location described
in the application is not within a Regional Medical District established pursuant to
Section 850.
1340.09 Renewal Application. Not less than 30 nor more than 60 days before the
expiration of any license issued pursuant to this Section, any license holder desiring to
renew the license shall submit a written application to the Clerk on forms provided by the
City together with payment in full of the license fee as required for the original license.
The renewal application shall be forwarded to the Manager who shall, within 30 days after
the renewal application date, either approve or deny the application and shall notify the
1340 -7
City of Edina . Trades and Occupations 1340.14
Clerk in writing of the decision. The Clerk shall then issue the license or, in case of denial,
notify the applicant in writing of the denial setting forth the reason or reasons therefor.
1340.10 Appeal to Council. Any applicant may appeal the denial of a license or a license
renewal by filing a written notice of appeal to the Council in the Clerk's office within 30
days after the denial. The Council shall hear the appeal within 60 days after the notice is
filed, and opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard in favor of or opposing the
issuance or renewal of the license. The Council may order and conduct such additional
investigation as it deems necessary. Any licensee is authorized to continue to operate until
final action by the Council upon licensee's renewal application, unless. prohibited by
Council resolution made after the denial.
1340.11 License Not Transferable; Duration. Each license shall be issued to the applicant
only and shall not be transferable to another holder. Any change in the persons named as
partners on the application, as required by paragraph CA of Subd. 1 of Subsection 1340.04
and any change in the persons who are named in the application as required by paragraph
D.4 of Subd. 1 of Subsection 1340.04, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes of this
Section. If the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of less
than 25% cumulatively over the license period, shall not be deemed a transfer. The change
in or addition of a vice- president, secretary, or treasurer of a corporate licensee shall not
be deemed a transfer. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be effective from
July 1 through June 30.
1340.12 Suspension or Revocation of License. The Council may suspend for any period
not exceeding 60 days, or revoke, any license issued pursuant to this Section upon finding
a violation of any provision of this Section or upon violation of any other provision of this
Code or State Law or regulation affecting the activities covered by this Section. Any
conviction for prostitution or any other crime or violation involving moral turpitude shall
result in the revocation of any license issued under this .Section. Except in the case of a
suspension pending a hearing on revocation, revocation or suspension by the Council shall
be preceded by written notice to the licensee of a hearing. The notice may be served upon
the licensee personally or by mailing it to the business or residence address set forth in the
application or on file with the Clerk. The notice shall give at least ten days notice of the
time and place of the hearing and shall state the nature of the charges against the licensee.
The Council may, without notice, suspend any license pending a hearing on revocation for
a period not exceeding 30 days.
1340.13 Hours of Operation. No business licensed under this Section shall be open for
business, nor shall any persons or customers be permitted on the premises, between the
hours of 10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M.
1340.14 Restrictions and Regulations.
Subd. 1 Notice of Change in Management. The individual designated by a
partnership or a corporation in its business license application to be manager and
1340 -8
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.15
in responsible charge of the business shall remain responsible for the conduct of the
business until another suitable person has been designated in writing by the license
holder. The license holder shall promptly give the Police Department written notice
of any such change indicating the name and address of the new manager and the
effective date of the change.
Subd. 2 Change of Employment or Location of Employment. Any person
practicing massage within the City shall inform the City of any changes in
employment or location of employment within the City within 30 days of the
change.
Subd. 3 Change in Address. Any person engaging in massage within the City
shall inform the City of any change in residence address within 30 days of the
change.
Subd.4 Clothing Requirements. Employees of all licensed businesses or
individuals licensed to practice massage shall be and shall remain fully clothed.
Subd. S Services Only Allowed at Business. No person shall perform a massage
for a fee or other consideration at any place other than a duly licensed physical
culture and health service, physical culture and health club, reducing salon, sauna
parlor or massage parlor, except as provided by Subd. 3 of Subsection 1340.12.
Subd. 6 No Soliciting in Public. No person shall solicit massage or escort services
in any public place within the City.
1340.15 Construction Requirements. No business license shall be issued under this
Section for other than an escort service unless the premises used for the operation shall
comply with the following requirements:
Subd. 1 Requirements for Steam or Hot Air Rooms. All rooms utilizing steam or
hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent, and all restrooms, changing rooms
and bathrooms used in connection with such rooms, shall be constructed with
materials impervious to moisture, bacteria, mold and fungus growth. Floor -to -wall
and wall -to -wall joints shall be constructed so as to provide a sanitary cove with a
minimum radius of 3/8 inch.
Subd. 2 Public Restroom Requirements. All public restrooms shall be provided
with mechanical ventilation with 2 cfm (cubic feet per minute) per square foot area,
a minimum of 15 foot candles of illumination, a hand washing sink equipped with
hot and cold running water under pressure, sanitary towels with dispensers and
soap with dispensers.
Subd. 3 Requirements for Janitor's Closet. Each such operation shall have a
janitor's closet for the storage of cleaning supplies with a mop sink, mechanical
1340 -9
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1340.18
ventilation with 2 cfm per square foot area and a minimum of 15 footcandles of
illumination.
Subd. 4 Lockers. Individual lockers shall be provided for use by customers and
shall have separate keys for locking.
1340.16 Maintenance; Sanitary Conditions; Communicable Disease.
Subd. 1 Clean and Sanitary Business. All businesses licensed under this Section
at all times shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
Subd. 2 Clean and Sanitary Instruments. All instruments and mechanical,
therapeutic, and bathing devices or parts that come into contact with the human
body at all times shall be kept clean and sanitary.
Subd. 3 Towels and Linens. No towels and linens furnished for use by one patron
shall be furnished for use by another until thoroughly laundered.
Subd. 4 Hand Washing. All individuals who practice massage shall wash their
hands before each massage.
Subd. 5 Communicable Disease. No person suffering from a communicable
disease shall work or be employed in a licensed business. No person suffering from
a communicable disease to the knowledge of the owner, custodian, or employees of
a licensed business shall be accommodated as a patron.
1340.17 Inspection. Each business required to be licensed shall at all times be held open
for inspection by duly authorized representatives of the City.
1340.18 Barber Shops and Beauty Salons Exempted. Barber shops and beauty salons
which do not give, or hold themselves out to give, massages, other than are customarily
given in such shops and salons for the purpose of facial beautification only shall not be
subject to,the provisions of this Section.
History: Ord 1353 adopted 1- 17 -79, amended 1353 -A1 11- 28 -84; 1353 -A2 7- 16 -86; Ord 1352
repealed 11 -28 -84
Reference: M.S. 144.50 through 144.703, 333, 364.03, Subd. 2, 136C
Cross Reference: Sections 160, 850
1340-10
I
p
LZM o
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
j Agenda Item #.
III •
B.
From:
David A. Velde
Consent
Information Only
Date:
April 4, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject:
Petition to keep
71
To Council
extra pets, 4817
Action
Motion
Vand_ervork_Avenue.
C
Resolution
f
Ordinance
Discussion
Rf PORT:
Attached is a finding to permit Mr. George Tate to keep six dogs.
The conditions as directed by the Edina City Council are included
in these findings.
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
IN RE PETITION OF: George Tate, 4817 Vandervork Avenue
The Edina City Council at a regular meeting has duly
considered the above Petition and after hearing and examining all
of the evidence and the file herein does hereby:
FIND AS FACT:
1. Petition filed March 3, 1994
2. Fee paid March 3, 1994
3. Notice mailed March 11, 1994
4. The proposed permit would:
A. Not be a nuisance.
B. Not be detrimental to the public health and safety of
the applicant or other persons in the vicinity.
CONCLUSION:
1. The procedural requirements of the Ordinance have been
met.
2. The permit should be granted as requested.
3. Conditions or restrictions applicable to this permit:
Two of the six dogs kept at 4817 Vandervork Avenue will
remain at this property only until Mr. Tates son. moves
away. All dogs must be licensed pursuant to Edina City
Ordinance No. 300.
4. This permit shall be effective April 4, 1994
however, this permit shall lapse and be of no effect
unless all conditons and restrictions are observed, the
applicant observes all City Ordinances applicable to the
keeping of dogs and cats, and the keeping of the dogs and
cats is not in violation of the Edina Zoning Ordinance.
which prohibits a kennel as a business in the Residential
Zone.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
City Clerk Dated
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
^to�ronwS.
To: CITY COUNCIL
From: WILLIAM BERNHJELM
CHIEF OF POLICE
Date: MARCH 31; 1994
Subject: 3.2 BEER LICENSE
AMERICAN LEGION
7070 AMUNDSON AVENUE
Recommendation:
INFORMATION ONLY
Info /Background
Agenda Item #
Vz_c
Consent,
❑
Information Only
�7u
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
AT THE MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1994, COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO PROVIDE NOTICE
TO THE LEGION OF A HEARING TO NOT RENEW THE 3.2 LICENSE OF THAT CLUB. THIS
WAS DONE ON MARCH 23, 1994. ON MARCH 28, 1994, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM
JOSEPH'SCHAPER OF THE LEGION WHO TOLD ME THAT THE LEGION WAS WITHDRAWING
THEIR REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF THE 3.2 LICENSE. A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION-OF
THAT CONVERSATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HIM ON THE FOLLOWING DAY. (SEE ATTACHED.)
-79
oel le�A
F4; 1 a
0 in
.�0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item # V1-D
From:
WILL BERNHJELM
Consent
❑X
CHIEF OF POLICE
Information Only
0
Date:
MARCH 31, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
RACE FOR THE CURE
❑
To Council
MAY 8, 1994
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
INFORMATION ONLY...
Info /Background
THE RACE FOR THE -CURE IS A 5K RACE, WALK, WHEELCHAIR EVENT THAT WILL BE HELD ON
MOTHER'S DAY, SUNDAY, MAY 8, 1994, FROM 7:30 AM TO 11:00 AM. THIS IS A CHARITY
RACE TO BENEFIT BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. THE ROUTE BEGINS AND ENDS AT SOUTHDALE
AND WILL WIND AROUND LAKE CORNELIA PARK. STREETS WILL BE CLOSED IN THE IMMEDIATE
AREA DURING THE ACTUAL RACES. TRAFFIC CONTROL WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT WITH VOLUNTEERS AND POLICE OFFICERS. BARRICADES AND TRAFFIC CONES ARE
PROVIDED BY PUBLIC WORKS. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CITY INVOLVEMENT ARE PAID
BY THE RACE SPONSOR... DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION. ADVISORY SIGNS ANNOUNCING THE
ROAD CLOSURES AND DETOUR WILL BE POSTED TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. THE
DETOURS POSED A MINIMAL INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC AND NO COMPLAINTS WERE RECEIVED
IN 1993.
HENNEPIN COUNTY HAS APPROVED THE USE OF FRANCE AVENUE FOR THIS EVENT. PROVISIONS
ARE BEING MADE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AT 66TH AND VALLEY VIEW THAT MAY BE
IN PROGRESS BY THIS DATE.
1*3 A-1
1
Cn
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item w
vz . E .
From: CEIL SMITH
Consent
177
i
i
Information Only
Date: APRIL 4, 1994
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject:
[x�]
To Council
LABOR CONTRACT WITH
Action
Motion
LOCAL 320 TEAMSTER -
-PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS
❑
Resolution
AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
rr��
OFFICERS
a
Ordinance
i
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve contract, the settlement is within budget.
Info /Background
The City and Union have come to the following agreement:
1. Increase wages 2%
2. Increase employer's contribution for health benefits at, $40.00
per month:
3. Contract language to define shift, and to clarify holiday and overtime
usage.
r,
� w91�1r'�
O tt�>
e1L
p
na
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
Ken Rosland
From:
Janet Chandler &
the Recycling & Solid
Date:
Waste Commission
April 4, 1994
Subject:
Report on Garbage
Collection Options
Agenda Item # VT . F.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize a survey of Edina residents to determine the extent of their concerns about
the present garbage hauling system and level of interest in making changes in the system.
INFO /BACKGROUND:
This report is in response to Council's March 7 request for a recommendation from the
Recycling & Solid Waste Commission regarding Edina garbage hauling system.
Previously, several concerns were raised by a resident in letters and discussions with the
Commission and with the Council. The resident requested that the city consider the
benefits of organized collection as well as other options, with the goal of reducing the
cost of garbage service for Edina residents.
Previous Study
The Recycling Commission undertook a study of garbage collection systems in 1991. At
the conclusion of their study, extensive reports were prepared for City Council by the
city sanitarian and the recycling coordinator. At the close of discussion, City Council
agreed with the Recycling Commission recommendation that Edina should keep an open
hauling system.
Recommendation for a Survey
Following discussion at their last two meetings, the Commission concluded that the
factors and issues have not changed substantially since the 1991 report. The
Commission also agreed that, since the last public hearing on this topic was many years
ago, it would be appropriate and helpful to have input from the residents at this time.
4K,
They voted unanimously to recommend a survey of residents to determine their level of
satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the present garbage hauling system.
A sampling of information which could be gathered would include- -
-the resident's level of satisfaction with current garbage service,
-the amount of support for - -or opposition to - -a change from the current system
and the reasons for support or opposition,
-the awareness of volume -based fees, and extent to which residents have signed
up for various levels of service,
-the extent of concern about the cost of garbage service,
-how much of a savings would be needed for residents to support a change in the
system,
- environmental concerns- -the number of service trucks on the street, noise, safety,
litter, emissions and street wear, and
- aesthetic concerns, including garbage and recycling at the curb
Recent Metro Area Waste Disposal Surveys
The cities of Chanhassen and Hopkins have recently completed surveys of their residents
and a metro area study has been completed for the Metropolitan Council. A few of the
results are pertinent to Edina's current discussions.
From the Chanhassen Survey When asked if they would support organized collection,
with the understanding that they may lose their right to choose haulers; 25% of the
respondents were very supportive of organized collection, 48 %' were neutral, and 27%
were not at all supportive of organized collection.
Forty percent were interested in single day collection zones, open to different haulers.
Nearly two-thirds of the residents felt that volume -based fees were very important.
From the GBB Consultant Study for Met Council Residents of cities with open hauling
paid more per household than residents of cities with organized collection at all levels of
service. The average cost difference was $1.82 per household per month.
The lack of choice for the residents and the negative impact on business opportunities
for small haulers were judged to be the primary disadvantages of changing to organized
collection. These considerations, coupled with the public's general resistance to change,
have offset the advantages claimed by proponents of organized collection in many cities.
From the Hopkins Survey The city wished to motivate residents to change from the 90
gallon garbage container currently in use to a 60 or 30 gallon size. The average Hopkins
resident would make a change only if the monthly savings were at least $180. Nearly
one -third said they would not change unless the savings would be at least $7 a month.
t
Survey Method
The Commission discussed various ways to conduct a survey: an insert in the utility bill,
an insert in About Town or a telephone survey. It was felt that a telephone survey would
have the highest percentage of response. A mail -in survey will bring responses from
those who have strong opinions one way or another, but those who are not concerned
may not bother to respond. For the purposes of this survey, it could be very important
to lmow how many residents feel that garbage collection is not an issue of concern.
Further research would be needed to determine how to obtain a representative sampling
of residents and other details of the survey process.
Recommendation
The Recycling & Solid Waste Commission and staff recommend that City Council
approve a survey of Edina residents on garbage collection issues. If approved, the
survey details would be developed further and brought for final Council approval at a
later date.
Attachment:
The . staff report portion of the July 1, 1991 report to City Council. (The resident letters,
hauler response, newspaper clipping and League of Women Voters report have not been
included.)
M
�g1;3a.
71
O ' W.
. , ,doll /
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Ken Ros 1 and
Agenda Item #
.
From:
Janet Chandler
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
July 1, 1 991
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Solid Waste Collection
®
To Council
- Review
of March 4.Staff Report,
Action
Motion
Janet Chandler
& Dave Velde
- Recyclinq
Commission Recommendation
❑
Resolution
- Leaque
of Women Voters Report
❑
Ordinance
EE
Discussion
Rg �ATiON
The Recycling Commission considered these options for garbage collection:
1. organized collection, 2. open hauling (present system,) 3. districting.
The majority voted to keep the open hauling system. There also was support
for the districted system, a variation of open hauling, whereby the City
designates collection days, thereby assuring that all residents have
recycling and garbage service on the same day. Two commissioners recommend
organized collection as being the better choice from an environmental
standpoint.
The staff recommendation is to keep the present system.
INFO /BACKGROUND
The enclosed staff report was briefly discussed by Council on March 4. At
that time, the Edina League of Women Voters also reported that they were
undertaking a study of garbage collection. Their study has been completed
and the consensus report is included for Council consideration.
Contents:
-Staff report, pg 2 -6
- Letters from residents, pg 7 -8
- Response from haulers, pg 9 -15
- Newspaper clipping, pg 16
- League of Women Voters of Edina Report, pg 17 -18
2
DEFINITIONS
open Hauling: city licensed haulers can service any area of the city;
property owners contract privately with the hauler of their choice.
Districting: same as open hauling except the city requires that all solid
waste be picked up on a certain day within each designated district.
Organized Collection: the city contracts with a hauler or group of haulers
to provide service for the entire city or section /s of the city.
Organized Collection Legal Process:'The Minnesota Waste Management Act
requires the following 180 -day procedure prior to implementing organized
collection. It is not required for districting.
1. Two week advance public notice, and mailed notice to all haulers
of a public hearing to consider organized collection.
2. Following the public hearing, Council may adopt a resolution of
intent to organize garbage collection.
3. A 90 -day planning period shall be spent working with the licensed
haulers of the city to develop a collection. plan agreeable to the
city and the haulers.
4. If the city is unable to agree on a plan with the haulers within
this 90 days, it may then propose an alternate plan.
5. The second 90 -day period shall be spent in evaluating the plan ( #3
or #4) according to these standards:
- achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city,
- minimizing displacement of collectors,
- ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision
making process, and
- maximizing efficiency in solid waste collection.
EDINA GARBAGE SERVICES
Currently, there are four garbage haulers serving Edina residents: Admiral
Waste Management, Quality Waste Control, Vierkant Disposal and Woodlake
Sanitary Service (BFI) . These haulers all offer volume -based garbage fees
for their customers. The increase in garbage rates in the past few years,
reflects the tip fee increase from $25 a ton to $95 a ton. Rates remained
quite stable for the past several months.
Yard waste fees varied a great deal in 1990, often tied to the level of
service. Full service customers usually paid less for yard waste pickup
than customers on a one -can or two -can garbage rate. A rate of $1 per bag
was common for low volume customers.
Major appliance disposal is now governed by state law which requires
recycling of appliances and special handling of PCB's, mercury switches and
CFCs. Garbage haulers will usually make the arrangements for a customer,
or residents can deal directly with an appliance recycler for pickup or
delivery. A charge of $20 to $25 is common for pickup service.
3
GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON - -OPEN HAULING SYSTEMS
The chart below compares the range of Edina rates and services with four
other Hennepin County cities with open hauling systems.
NUMBER OF SINGLE ONE CAN RATE TWO CAN RATE THREE OR MORE
CITY SYSTEM HAULERS RATE LOW -HIGH LOW-HIGH LOW-HIGH
EDINA Open 4 $16.00 - $18.25 $19.00 - $20.75 $23.75 - $25.25
BLOOMINGTON District 6 $21 $14.50 - $17.00 517.75419.50 $21.75-$23.75
(one hauler)
EDEN PRAIRIE Open 3 $14.00 - $17.00 $17.00 - $19.50 $21.75 - 522.50
MINNETONKA Open 10 $15.00 - $18.00 518.00420.00 $21.00424.00
RICHFIELD Open 5 $21 $14.00417.00 $17.00419.50 $23.00- $22.75
(one hauler)
The following observations can be made:
- Edina's rates are $1.25 to $2 higher per month than the other cities
listed. Since the other cities have curbside pickup, this difference
is presumed to be for garage service. Otherwise, rates are similar,
city to city.
- Districting does not appear to affect garbage rates.
-With one exception, all haulers in these cities offer volume based
rates.
- Volume based rates 'offer residents the opportunity to save money on
garbage service. For example; the difference between the lowest
one -can rate and the highest full service rate in Edina is $9.25 per
month.
GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON -- ORGANIZED HAULING SYSTEMS
30 GALLON 60 GALLON 90 GALLON YARD WASTE APPLIANCES RECYCLING
EXCELSIOR $15.16 $17.90 +51.10 per bag Extra chg Separate contract, $1.80 /hh
HOPKINS $19.04 No extra chg Extra chg Separate contract, $2.30 /hh
(City Crew)
ROBBINSDALE $12 Recycler $14 Recy $16.50 +$1 per bag Extra chg Cost included in
$14.Non-recy $18 Non -rec $20.50 contract.
ST.LOUIS PK $16.74 Recy No extra chg No extra chg Additional $2.02 /hh /mo,
$19.07 Nan -Recy Same contract.
Comments on this chart:
-The rates are for curb or alley pickup.
-At all levels of service, the organized garbage.rates are somewhat
lower than open hauling rates in the cities surveyed. Many factors
such as smaller lot size and efficiency of alley pickup may account
for the lower rates. The cities which more closely resemble Edina
have open hauling systems, making comparison difficult.
4
-Yard waste pickup is included with the higher, single -rate service,
but.an add -on with low- volume service. This is similar to the open
hauling rate structure.
- Garbage and recycling service can be included in the same contract,
but not all cities have chosen to do so.
- Recycling has been encouraged by lower recycling rates or low- volume
rates.
FUTURE TRENDS
The latest design is a high -tech computerized garbage truck which lifts,
records the weight, and empties a standardized garbage can automatically.
Garbage bills are then computed on the basis of weight. Farmington,
Minnesota plans to install the system this year. (See attachment)
Trash now goes in many directions: recycling systems for paper, glass,
metals, plastics, appliances, batteries, motor oil etc. -- compost sites for
yard waste -- incineration for most garbage. This trend toward separate
handling of waste materials shows no sign of stopping.
The trend in rate structure seems to be going.toward user -fees, with
separate charges for garbage, yard waste, recyclables, appliances etc.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
Why should a city consider organized garbage collection? Or a districted
system? What are the policy concerns? The following factors are presented
for consideration in answering these questions.
1. Cost Savings for Residents
From the comparison charts, it appears that rates would be 'lower with
organized collection. The haulers disagree, stating in their responses,
that there would not be a savings for residents. (See attachments)
In organized systems, cities can set the rate structure, and thereby
promote recycling and waste reduction with volume -based fees or other
incentives.
There are, however, some unknowns. Factors such as lot size and distance
from disposal sites also enter into the rate setting process.
Other costs need to be considered in organized collection. City staffing
would need to be increased, perhaps by one full time equivalent position,
to deal with the additional utility billing and service problems. Also, we
should expect some delinquencies in payment of bills by residents, which
would increase costs.
2. Efficiency and Environmental Concerns
Organized collection, with one garbage truck serving a neighborhood, is the
most efficient system. It follows that there would also be a reduction in
wear on streets and in the amount of truck exhaust.
Because of separate pickups for garbage, recycling and yard waste, Edina
neighborhoods under the present system may possibly have 10 or more trucks
providing trash collection services. With an organized system, three
trucks would get the job done in any given neighborhood.
5
3. Esthetics: Neighborhood Appearance
With districted or organized systems each neighborhood can be served on one
day with pickup of garbage, recycling and yard waste. The benefit to the
neighborhood is a quieter, neater environment for the remainder of the
week.
4. Freedom of Choice
With an open system, residents can shop around for the hauling service that
best suits their needs. For some, yard waste disposal is very important;
for others, a low- volume garbage rate is most important. In the past,
Edina residents expressed a strong preference to preserve their choice of
garbage haulers.. In an organized collection process, residents would have
the opportunity to express their wishes on this issue at a public hearing.
5. Illegal Garbage Disposal
Edina ordinance #711 requires that garbage be collected weekly by a
licensed hauler. Contrary to this ordinance, an unknown number of
residents dispose of their garbage by other means. Some examples are:
-A resident may collect the trash of an elderly parent and dispose of
it at his /her own residence.
-Two neighbors may arrange joint garbage service, putting their
garbage in a common container and sharing the cost.
- Garbage may be taken to a dumpster at the residents' place of
business.
- Garbage may be dropped in public places, such as the Recycling
Center, Public Works Building or City Parks.
- Garbage may be allowed to accumulate on the premises:
In some cases, the rising cost of garbage collection was the motivating
factor. On the other hand, some of these practices occurred when garbage
rates were very low.
Public dumping of garbage doesn't seem to be as serious a problem for Edina
as for many other cities. Gene Bartz, Public Works Superintendant, has not
observed any significant increase in garbage dumping in the past few
years. He feels it is a minor problem which they are able to handle.
Organized garbage collection would assure that all residents have garbage
service. The expectation would be that practices like those listed above
would greatly diminish. One remaining question- -what happens when a bill
isn't paid? If garbage service were then discontinued, the problems would
return.
7. Response from Edina Garbage Haulers
Edina residential haulers were notified of this meeting and asked to
complete a questionnaire. Their written responses are attached to this
report.
In follow -up phone calls, the haulers all expressed their serious concern
with organized hauling systems even if they were sure to be included in the
contract. They view this type of system as limiting their opportunities to
expand, since the pickup area and number of customers is set for the length
of the contract.
6
Likewise, a districting system is seen as interfering with their ability to
plan routes for maximum efficiency. One hauler who provides twice a week
pickup would not be able to offer this service under a districting system
unless an exception were made.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION'
Many residents feel that their garbage rates are too high. They are
putting more into the recycling container, less in the garbage can, and
feel they should see a savings on the garbage bill. This may not be a
realistic expectation, due to the high tip fee for garbage disposal, but it
is a very understandable reaction. Perhaps new technology, such as paying
for garbage by weight, will bring more fairness into rate structures.
Each of the garbage systems has its advantages. There is not a clear -cut
easy answer. The questions comes down to: what amount of savings
justifies a changeover to a new system? $10 a year? $25 a year? or?
And, what would the public prefer?
If Council wishes to test public opinion on the issues, a public hearing
can be set as the beginning of the organized collection process. This
process can be concluded at that point if the weight of opinion so
dictates.
A districted system could be instituted with or without a public hearing.
Council could direct staff to work with the haulers to develop such a
system for Council approval.
Lastly, if Council believes that the current system serves the residents
well, no action need be taken at this time.
ri,
0.
tA
Cn
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: April 4, 1994
Subject:
Updates of Purchasing
Policies and Procedures
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # vz c
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve resolution approving the amended City's Purchasing Policies
and Requirements as discussed at the Council meeting of March 21,
1994
Info/Background-
Attached is the full purchasing policies as updated for the four
changes as discussed at the last council meeting:
- Remove sales tax exemption.
- Written quotations should be retained for ten years instead
of one year as now required.
-Make changes in the ongoing purchases section for the
expanded us of open purchase orders.
- Authorize the City Manager to approve payment of claims he
determines to be,in the best interest of the City up to
$1,000.00, and liquor payments according to recently passed
State Statute, Section 412.271.
As requested the Auditor's comment concerning the City's non-
compliance with prior State Statute when paying liquor
purchases is attached.
Certified Public Accountants
4200 Norwest Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Independent Auditors' Report
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Edina, Minnesota:
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Edina,
Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 1991, and have issued our report
thereon dated April 24, 1992.
Our audit was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the
standards for compliance audits contained in the Legal Compliance Audit Guide, issued
by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 6.6.5 and,
accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing
procedures as we considered necessary in the- circumstances. The Legal Compliance
Audit Guide covers five main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and
bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, and claims
and disbursements. Our audit included all of the categories listed above.
The management of the City is responsible for the City's compliance with laws and
regulations. In - connection with the audit referred to above, we selected and tested
transactions and . records to determine the City's compliance with those laws and
regulations for which noncompliance could have a material effect on the City's general
purpose financial statements.
The results of our tests indicate that for the transactions and records tested, the City
compiled with those laws and regulations referred to above, except as described in the
following paragraph. With respect to the transactions and records that were not tested
by us, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City had not complied with
laws and regulations.
We noted that claims paid prior to a council meeting (manual checks) are not signed by a
majority of the council (M.S. 412.271, subd. 4). This relates primarily to payment of
liquor store obligations, but also includes other miscellaneous manual payments. We
note, however, that anticipated purchases in excess of $5,000 are approved by council
prior to placement of the purchase orders. In addition, manual checks, exclusive of pay-
ments of liquor store obligations, are approved by the Finance Director before payment.
in Member Firm of
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
Peat Marwick
2
This report is intended solely for the use of management, City Council and federal and
state agencies, and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is not
intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
April 24, 1992
n,.� hck.. 3994-M: ........ 4$
(Revised ;act �!) ... ...
(Approved by City Council
1 l is «>` >
November 18, 99 > >«<« > > »_ €< <'«`
.::.;::.;::...... ::.:.
CITY OF EDINA
PURCHASING POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS
PART I: Policies and Requirements Applicable to All Purchases and Contracts
1.1. Budget — Before any commitment for purchase of an item or service is made,
money needs to be budgeted, either directly for the item or service or by means of a
budgeted fund into which the purchase can be categorized. Purchases not within a
budget require Finance Director and City Council approval for availability and
transfer of funds. It is up to each Department to insure that it has not made
commitments for more money than has been budgeted.
1.2. Expenditure Requirements — All expenditures of funds require Council
approval before actual disbursement. (Minn. Stat. § 412.271). For the most part, this
is done at the end of each Council meeting. Before funds can be disbursed for any
purchase, the purchase must meet three criteria:
a. First, statutory authority must exist for the City to make the particular
purchase. While not a problem in most cases, certain purchases may
require research;
b. Second, it must be purchased for a public purpose; and
C. Third, the Council must have properly approved the expenditure.
Generally, an expenditure will be for a public purpose if it benefits the
inhabitants of the community as a whole and if it is directly connected
with the government of the City.
All of these tests must be met prior to any commitment. If in doubt, check with the
Finance Director. If City money is spent for unauthorized purchases, the members
of the City Council could be personally liable.
1.3. Required Authorization for Purchase — In addition to the requirement that the
Council approve of each expenditure of funds, the following Council authorizations
are required prior to ordering or obtaining any item or service:
a. Over $5,000 — All purchases over $5,000 need City Manager and
Council approval RELor to ordering or purchasing. (Minn. Stat.
r
§ 412.271, Chapter 36, 1981 Laws of Minnesota, and Council resolution
of October 5, 1981). All such purchases will use the Request For
Purchase form. (APPENDIX A)
b. $5,000 and Under — All purchases $5,000 and under require City
Manager and Finance Director approval prior to ordering and
purchasing. (Chapter 36, 1981 Laws of Minnesota and Council minutes
of October 5,1981).
NOTE: In both a. and b. above, the Council must approve the expenditures
before payment is made.
1.4. Statutorily Mandated Processes for Selected Purchases and Rentals — The
purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or rental of same, or the construction,
alteration, repair or maintenance of real or personal property, in addition to the
procedures at 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 above, require the following procedures (Minn. Stat.
t.
§ 471.345 and Minn. Stat. § 412.311):
a. Over $15,000 — If the expenditure is estimated to exceed $15,000, then
the following is required:
(i) Sealed bids with appropriate public notice (See PART B below);
(ii) Purchase Order properly filled out or contract (subject to Council
Approval);
(iii) A performance and payment bond in the amount of the contract
if the contract is for the doing of any public work (Minn. Stat.
§ 574.26);
(iv) Finance Director approval;
(v) City Manager approval;
(vi) Council approval; and
(vii) Award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
b. Over $10,000 to $15,000 — If the expenditure is estimated to be over
$10,000 but not over $15,000, then the following is required:
(i) Either sealed bids with appropriate public notice the same as for
expenditures over $15,000 can be obtained, or direct negotiation
-2-
I
can be used, by obtaining two or more written quotations, when
possible;
(ii) A Purchase Order properly filled out or contract (subject to
Council approval);
(iii) A performance and payment bond in the amount of the contract
if the contract is for the doing of any public work (Minn. Stat.
§ 574.26);
(iv) Finance Director approval;
(v) City Manager approval;
(vi) Council approval; and
(vii) Award of contract to lowest responsible bidder.
-4-1-1 vH-4-t4en quetatiefflAS be kept en file i9r. a pe-r-i-od of at least ene
C. Over $5,000 to $10,000 — If the expenditure is estimated to be over
$5,000 but not over $10,000, then the following is required:
(i) At least two written quotations shall be received unless there is
only one supplier or. vendor (Note: if the cost is to be specially
assessed under Minn. Stat. § 429, and if the estimated cost
exceeds $5,000, advertising for bids must be done. See Part 11
hereof);
(ii) Purchase Order properly filled out or contract (subject to Council
approval);
(iii) Performance and payment bond in the amount of the contract if
the contract is $10,000 or more and is for the doing of any public
work;
(iv) Finance Director approval;
(v) City Manager approval;
NO Council approval; and
(vii) Award of contract to lowest responsible bidder.
-3-
d. Over $1,000 to $5,000 — If the expenditure is estimated to be over $1,000
but not over $5,000, then the following is required:
(i) At least two written quotations shall be received unless there is
only one supplier or vendor;
(ii) Purchase Order properly filled out;
(iii) Finance Director approval;
(iv) City Manager approval; and
(v) Council approval prior to actual disbursement of funds.
e. Over $500 - $1,000 — -If the expenditure is estimated, to be over $500 but
not over $1,000, the following is required:
(i) Purchases at this level makes written quotations impracticable,
therefore, such purchases shall be made on the open market and
written quotations shall not be required;
(ii) Purchase order properly filled out;
(iii) Finance Director approval;
(iv) City Manager approval; and
(v) Council approval prior to actual disbursement of funds.
All Z • r etatio shall be kept on file for. a r ^
nd e f ..t least ane
f. $500 or less — If the expenditure is estimated to be $500 or less, the
. following is required:
-4-
(i) Purchases at this level makes written quotations impracticable,
therefore, such purchases shall be made on the open market and
written quotations shall not be required;
(ii) A purchase order number must be obtained verbally or in
writing from the Finance Department unless such purchase is
being made pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 1.10 or 1.21
hereof;
(iii) City Manager approval, or approval by the head of the
Department for which the purchase is being made, or approval
by one of the persons named on the then current list of persons
approved by the City Manager and kept on file with the Finance
Director; and
(iv) Council approval prior to actual disbursement of funds.
Among purchases not requiring the above procedures are purchases of such as
insurance, real estate, and services (see paragraph 2.13 "When Bidding Is
Unnecessary" below). Even when not required, it is desired, if a purchase is in a
competitive area, that quotations be obtained for comparison purposes. If the public
bidding process is used, even if not required, all aspects of that process must be
complied with.
1.5. Purchase Order Processing
a. The responsible Department must prepare a requisition form
(APPENDIX B) with all pertinent information included and submit to
Finance Department. The pertinent information must include a
description of the product, quantity, price, account codes, applicable
specifications, and any similar information. NOTE: Purchase Order
numbers must be obtained prior to any purchase commitment.
b. The Finance Department will prepare the Purchase Order and obtain
the Finance Director's signature.
-5-
C. Approval as provided in paragraph 1.4 and applicable to the total
amount of the purchase order, must be obtained prior to submission to
the vendor.
d. Copies of the Purchase Order will be distributed by the Finance
Department as follows:
(i) Original to vendor;
(ii) Buff to Finance Department retained file; and
(iii) Pink to ordering department to await receipt of items ordered
and then to be returned to Finance Department along with
approved invoice.
e. Upon Council approval, payment may be sent to vendor.
1.6. Central Purchasing — Similar items that are purchased by many Departments,
in particular general office supplies, should be purchased centrally by either Finance
and /or Administration and if not charged to central services, will be allocated or
charged back to each recipient department.
1.7. Cooperative Purchasing — Certain items may be obtained by utilizing either the
County or State cooperative purchasing- contracts. While this eliminates the need
for separate bidding on an item, it is yet necessary to get Council authorization when
purchases over $5,000 are to be made, or City Manager approval for purchases up to
$5,000, and also Council approval of payment before payment is made.
1.8. Emergency Purchases — Occasions may arise where purchases over $5,000 must
be made before the Council can approve them and where the required public
bidding cannot be done. Where such a purchase is made, Council approval must yet
be obtained before payment is made. An emergency must be a situation arising
suddenly and unexpectedly which requires speedy action essential to health, safety
and welfare of the community, and not just an inconvenience (Layne Minnesota
Co. v. Town of Stuntz, 257 N.W.2d. 295 [Minn., 1977]).
1.9. Payment Prior to Council Approval — There are limited exceptions to the
general rule that the Council must approve all claims before they are paid. Those
exceptions are listed in Minn. Stat. § 412.271, as follows:
a. Judgments;
b. Salaries and wages previously fixed by the Council or statute;
M
C. Principal and interest on obligations in amounts previously
determined by contract authorized by the Council;
d. Rent and other fixed charges in amounts previously determined by
contract authorized by the Council;
e. When payment of a claim based on a contract cannot be deferred
without loss to the City by forfeiture of discount privileges or
otherwise, the claim may be paid immediately if the itemized claim is
endorsed for payment by at least a majority of the Council members
(such earlier payment does not affect the right of the City or any
taxpayer to challenge the validity of the claim).
f. Payment from an imprest fund established pursuant to Minn. Stat.
§ 412.271, subd. 5. (See paragraph 1.12 below).
1.10. Ongoing Purchases — Some items, or categories of items, are purchased
several times during each year or season, and each purchase is normally a small
amount. To require a purchase order or purchase order number for each such
purchase creates an unnecessary and wasteful burden. Therefore, to simplify such
purchases and avoid such unnecessary and wasteful burden, and yet retain controls
over such purchases, the following is required:
a. Items for which amounts needed during a year or season can be
estimated (such as office supplies):
(i) An open purchase order must be used for the period over which
such purchases are to be made, usually a year or a season, instead
of individual purchase order or purchase order number for each
purchase;
(ii) An open purchase order shall be used for each supplier or
vendor from whom such ongoing purchasers will be made;
(iii) The total amount estimated to be expended over the purchasing
period shall be inserted in the purchase order by the statement
"not to exceed $x ", also the words "Open Purchase Order for
199_" shall be inserted in the Description column, and "Open
Purchase Order" shall be inserted in the Amount column;
-7-
(iv) The procedure in paragraph 1.4 applicable to the estimated total
amount to be expended over the purchasing period shall be
complied with, except that the provisions of this paragraph
relating to purchase orders shall apply and control;
i's` AM •1 • /^hnC/, AYI7AY C�711__•_,At 10 • /, — 4�0
ACi.,1Y\n�(L�_
m r,
(v4.) Open purchase orders under this subparagraph a. shall not be
used to purchase any single item costing more than $500.00, but
for such purchases the applicable procedures at paragraph 1.4
must be used;
(vii) Once the aggregate cost of purchases made under the open
purchase order totals the "not to exceed" amount stated in the
open purchase order a new open
purchase order must be prepared and used in compliance with
this paragraph;
(vii4-) The Council shall approve each purchase prior to disbursement
of funds fi
b. Items for which amounts needed during a year or season cannot be
estimated (such as repair parts for trucks autos and equipment):
(i) An open purchase order must be used for the period over which
such purchases are to be made, usually a year or a season, instead
of individual purchase order or purchase order number for each
purchase;
(ii) An open purchase order shall be used for each supplier or
vendor from whom such ongoing purchasers will be made;
(iii) The total amount estimated to be expended over the purchasing
period may be left blank;
(iv) Each purchase shall be approved by the City Manager, or by the
head of the Department for which the purchase is being made, or
by one of the persons named on the then current list of persons
approved by the City Manager and kept on file with the Finance
Director;
(v) Open purchase orders under this subparagraph b. shall not be
used to purchase any single item costing more than $500.00, but
for such purchases the applicable procedures at paragraph 1.4
must be used;
(vi) The Council shall approve each purchase prior to disbursement
of funds:
1.11. Splitting Purchases — Do not split purchases in an attempt to circumvent any
purchasing requirements.
1.12. Imprest Fund /Petty Cash — Certain purchases can be more economically
handled through use of petty cash funds to reimburse for purchases. The maximum
allowable purchase through any such fund is $25. The cashier/ custodian of each
such fund is solely responsible for accounting for expenditures from the fund under
his or her control. No salaries or personal employee expenses shall be paid from
such fund. Any payment from any such fund not approved by the Council is the
personal obligation of the cashier/ custodian of that fund. (Minn. Stat. § 412.271,
Subd. 5).
1.13. Prompt Payment — The City must pay bills within 35 days of receipt unless a
good faith dispute exists. The date of receipt is the date of completed delivery of the
goods or services, of satisfactory installation or assembly, or of the receipt of the
invoice for the delivery of goods, whichever is latest. If bills are not paid within the
standard payment period, interest at one and one —half percent per month must be
calculated and paid. The minimum monthly interest penalty on the unpaid balance
of any overdue bill of $100 or more is $10. For unpaid balances less than $100 the
actual interest should be calculated and paid. Vendors must be notified of invoice
errors within 10 days of receiving the invoice. In cases of delayed payments due to
good faith disputes with vendors, no interest penalties accrue. If payments are
0
delayed but not in good faith, the vendor may recover costs and attorneys' fees.
(Minn. Stat. § 471.425).
1.14. Sales Tax And fl.thr Alicable'Taxes The City of Edina is
exempt from paying sales ox exa taxes on =eta purchases. Most vendors have
forms that can be filled out to certify tax exemption, or a letter can be sent to the
..
vendor `the vUrc a ls,. :6 e
p ... .......:::::::::::::::::::.::::
1.15. Non Discrimination — All contracts for materials, supplies or construction
must contain a contractor's agreement not to discriminate against prospective
employees because of race, creed or color (Minn. Stat. § 181.59).
1.16. Worker's Compensation Insurance — A contract for the doing of "public
work" may not be entered into before receiving, from all contracting parties,
acceptable evidence of compliance with the worker's compensation insurance
coverage requirements of state law (Minn. Stat. § 176.182).
1.17. Progress Payments; Retainage — A progress payment is not an acceptance or
approval of any work or waiver of any defects. An amount may be reserved as
retainage from any progress payment on a public contract for a public improvement.
The amount of retainage may not exceed five percent of the payment. (Minn. Stat.
§ 15.71 and § 429.041, Subd. 6). At the contractor's option, the retainage shall be paid
to the contractor, and the contractor may deposit bonds or securities in lieu of the
retainage. If the City incurs additional costs as a result of this option, the City may
recover the costs by reducing the final'contract payment. (See Minn. Stat. § 15.73)
1.18. Withholding — Before final payment is made, the Contractor, as required by
Minn. Stat. § 290.97, must make a satisfactory showing of compliance with the
provisions of Minn. Stat. § 290.92 regarding withholding of state income taxes for
wages paid employees on the project. A certificate from the Minnesota
Commissioner of Revenue will satisfy this requirement.
1.19. Prevailing Wage Rates — If the project or work is funded in whole or in part
with State Aid funds, the contract must require the Contractor to pay the prevailing
wages. Also, the Contractor's bid proposal must contain a letter or certificate so
agreeing to pay prevailing wages. Prevailing wage information can be obtained
from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, 443 Lafayette Road, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55155 -4306 (phone: 612/296 - 2282).
1.20. Change Orders — Change orders to contracts and purchase orders approved by
the Council or City Manager shall be made pursuant to the following policies and
procedures and the use of any one of the methods set out at c. through g. following:
-10-
a. Authorized Persons — The only persons authorized to sign and
approve change orders on behalf of the City are the City Manager, the
Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer and the Finance Director (the
"Authorized Persons ").
b. Council A1212roval — All change orders shall be approved by the
Council prior to signing by any Authorized Person except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph 1.20. No payment of any change order shall
be made without prior Council approval, except as allowed by
paragraph 1.9.
C. Decreasing Cost — Change orders decreasing the cost of any contract
made by the City may be signed and approved on behalf of the City by
any Authorized Person without prior Council approval.
d. Increases Up To $5,000 — Any change order which increases the
contract price by $5,000 or less may be signed and approved on behalf of
the City by any Authorized Person with prior approval of the City
Manager.
e. Emergencies — Any change order which, due to an emergency, cannot
be deferred until the Council can approve it, may be signed and
approved by any Authorized Person without prior Council approval.
(See paragraph 1.8 for additional comments.)
Avoidance of Loss — Any change order which cannot be deferred until
the Council can approve it without loss to the City may be signed and
approved by any Authorized Person if the change order is endorsed for
payment by at least three members of the Council.
g. Up to 10% — Any change order which does not exceed 10% of the
original contract price, by itself or in the aggregate with all then prior
change orders relating to that same contract, may be signed and
approved by any Authorized Person without prior Council approval,
provided the contract provides for change orders.
Note: change orders that materially change the terms of a contract may be deemed ,a
new contract and may have to be rebid and receive prior Council approval. If in
doubt, check with the City Manager and City Attorney.
1.21. Unit Price Contracts — Some contracts for the purchase of goods or for
construction are based on the unit price times the estimated number of units
without a maximum dollar cost stated. At times the estimate is too low and
Sol
additional units are added and must be paid for. The following policies apply to
such contracts:
a. The estimate of units should be carefully made, and should be on the
high end of any estimated range of units needed;
b. The contract shall be presented to the Council as a "unit price basis"
contract with an estimated maximum dollar cost;
C. The procedure in paragraph 1.4 applicable to the estimated maximum
cost shall be complied with; and
d. Any increase in units purchased necessary to fulfill and perform the
purpose of the contract, and, therefore, in contract cost, beyond the
estimated maximum shall be deemed a part of the approved contract,
and shall not be deemed a change order, but no payment for any units
in excess of the estimated maximum shall be made without prior
Council approval.
PART 11: Policies and Requirements Avvlicable to Competitive Bidding Process.
2.1. When Useable — While mandated for certain purchases, the use of competitive
bidding is not limited to the mandated areas and can be used more extensively, but
should not be used for amounts under $5,000 as the cost of the process is significant.
If the City fails to advertise for bids when the law requires competitive bidding, the
contract is void, but the City must pay for any benefits it received.
2.2. When Bidding is Required — All contracts for the purchase or rental of
supplies, materials or equipment, or for the construction, alteration, repair or
maintenance of real or personal property, when the estimated amount of the
contract exceeds $15,000, require competitive bids. (Minn. Stat. § 471.345). Also, if
the cost is estimated to exceed $5,000, the contract must be let to the lowest
responsible bidder. (Minn. Stat. § 412.311). If the cost of a project is to be specially
-12-
assessed under Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes, and if the estimated cost exceeds
$5,000, advertising for bids must be done. (Minn. Stat. § 429.041, Subd.1).
2.3. Specifications — For the purposes of informing potential bidders, specifications
should outline precisely and in detail what is to be purchased or constructed. These
need to be reasonably specific, but not to the point of eliminating competing types
and qualities. (Minn. Stat. § 471.35). Violation of this restriction is a gross
misdemeanor. (Minn. Stat. § 471.37). A brand name may be specified, but potential
bidders must be able to bid an equal product. In addition to the specifications for the
purchase, instructions to bidders and general conditions (See APPENDICES C AND
D OR APPENDIX E for examples) should be updated, modified as needed and _
included in the bid package so that all contractual obligations of both parties are
known. Competitive bids must be re–let when there is a material change in the
terms or specifications, even if you believe that the change would have no effect on
the rank order of the bids received. Caution should be taken before determining
whether the term or specification change is material or not. The proposals and
specifications must allow free and full competition. They may not give a
prospective bidder an unfair. advantage over any other. Specifications must be
sufficiently definite and precise to afford a basis for comparable bids. If the number
of units needed cannot be determined, bids should be requested on a unit basis. .(See
paragraph 1.21 for additional comments on unit price contracts)..
2.4. Bid Bonds — While not required by statute, the City of Edina may require a bid
bond, certified check or cashier's check in lieu to insure that the bid will be honored
and not withdrawn for up to a specifiers number of days. The bond or check is
usually set at 10% of the purchase price.
2.5. Performance Bonds — Unless the amount of the contract is $10,000 or less, any
contract for the doing of any "public work" is not valid unless a performance and
payment bond is given as required by Minn. Stat. § 574.26. The City form should be
used. The City form is available from the City Clerk.
2.6. Notice — For all contracts requiring advertising for bids, legal notice must be
published in the City's official - newspaper at least once 10 days before the last day for
submission of bids. (Minn. Stat. § 412.311). If the project is to be specially assessed
under Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes, and the estimated cost exceeds $100,000,
publication must be made at least once in the official newspaper, and at least once in
a newspaper published in the City of Minneapolis or a trade paper (as defined in
Minn. Stat. § 429.041, Subd. 1), not less than three weeks before the last date for
submission of bids. For construction contracts and heavy equipment purchases,
notices should also be published in the Construction Bulletin (APPENDIX F).
Non –legal notices may be included in such publications as the League of Minnesota
Cities magazine for wider coverage.
-13-
2.7. Notice Information — The published notice (APPENDIX F) should, contain the
following information (Minn. Stat. § 429.041, Subd. 1):
a. A description of the project or purchase;
b. The availability of specifications in the office of the City Clerk;
C. The last day for submission of bids and the place where they are due;
d. The time and the place for the opening of bids;
e. That no bid will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk,
and accompanied by the check or bid bond as required by the City; and
That the City reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and any or all
alternative bids.
2.8. Bid Opening and Award — On the date and at the time for opening of bids, all
bids should be opened and read for interested parties. The opening should be
scheduled at least three (3) working days before the Council meeting (typically the
Thursday before) for inclusion in Council packets. Bids should be tabulated on the
over $5,000 Request for Purchase form (APPENDIX A). It is important that all bid
proposals be studied carefully prior to making recommendations to the Council for
the award of bid. Recommendation on award of bid should be made not only on
price, but on quality and quantity as specified and also on responsibility (See "Lowest
Responsible Bidder" below). The award should go to the lowest responsible bidder
meeting specifications. Once the bid is awarded by the Council, all bid results should
be available to anyone requesting them. Construction Bulletin should be informed
on items advertised in that publication. Once the Council accepts the lowest
responsible bidder and awards the contract, a contract exists even if the written
contract is not formally signed.
2.9. S lip tting Contracts — You must not attempt to avoid the bidding requirements
by splitting a contract into several contracts, each of which is below the minimum
amount requiring bids. If materials or work logically fall into two separate contracts
because they involve separate transactions, as for the service of contractors
specializing in different kinds of work, there is no reason why the contracts cannot
be separated and dealt with separately. If splitting the purchase into separate
contracts serves no specific purpose except to reduce the amount of the contract to
less than the applicable minimum, the contract could be considered invalid.
2.10. Rejecting Bids — The City may and should reserve the right to reject any or all
bids, or to waive immaterial informalities or irregularities. Unless the bid responds
-14-
to the specifications in all material respects, it is not a bid, but a new proposition that
should be rejected.
2.11. Lowest Responsible Bidder — "Responsible" in bid statutes, means not only
financial responsibility but also integrity, skill, and the likelihood of the bidder's
doing faithful and satisfactory work. Value does not always depend on price alone.
Where plans and specifications demand consideration of several factors and no
single bid is lowest in all these factors, weight should be given to the various factors,
and, considering all of them, accept what is deemed to be the lowest responsible bid.
2.12. Opening and Tabulating Bids — The bidding process should be kept open until
the time and date deadline has expired. The process of opening and tabulating bids
must be open to the public.
2.13. When Bidding is Unnecessary — It is not necessary for the City to advertise for
bids for:
a. Professional services such as engineers, lawyers, architects, accountants,
and other services requiring technical, scientific, or professional
training;
b. The purchase or lease of real estate;
C. Non - competitive products which are patented or obtainable from only
one source. (Minn. Stat. § 471.36);
d. For insurance generally (except that group insurance requires
published notice seeking competitive proposals). (Minn. Stat.
§ 471.6161);
e. The purchase, lease, sale, or other acquisition or disposition of
equipment, supplies, materials, or other property, including real
property from or to the United States of America, or any agency
thereof, or any agency of the State of Minnesota, or any political
subdivision of Minnesota. (Minn. Stat. § 471.64);
f. Contracts for "guaranteed energy savings" where the contractor
guarantees the energy cost savings of insulation, or efficient heating or
cooling systems, will be greater than the cost of the product. (Minn.
Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 13); and
g. If Edina establishes a set aside program for buying goods and services
from economically disadvantaged persons or from rehabilitation
-15-
facilities, contracts can be. made to such supplier without bidding,
subject to some limitations. (Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 8 and 12).
2.14. Other Provisions — The provisions of paragraphs 1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.16, 1.17,
1.18,1.19,1.20 and 1.21 also apply to this Part H.
-16-
(Revised October 1991)
(Approved by City Council,.
,.1991)
CITY OF EDINA
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR
DISPOSITION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
Requirements — The sale or disposal of property that has lawfully come into the possession of
the City, and all City property in need of disposal, shall be disposed of via the, following means.
The sale of real estate is not included in these requirements. Property for disposal is divided into
categories by method of receipt as follows:
1) If purchased by the City, the material can be disposed of by any means the City
determines, including the auctions below set out; and
2) Property obtained incident to law enforcement actions, abandoned or turned
over to the City as lost and remaining unclaimed for over 60 days may be
disposed of after that time period at public auction. (Ordinance No. 131).
3) In the case of abandoned vehicles, the City shall comply with the provisions
of Minn. Stat. Chapter 168B in selling such vehicles.
4) In the case of property forfeited to the City pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.531
through § 609.5317, the City shall comply with the provisions of said statutes
in disposing of such property.
suction — The City may hold an auction, as: needed, to dispose of all material not disposed of in
dny other manner.
Police Bike Auction — A bike auction will be held in late spring and, if necessary, again in late
September. At the September auction all other material should be disposed of also.
Cooperative County Auction — A vehicle no longer needed by the City should be disposed of at
the Cooperative County Auction(s) during the May -October time frame. Participation may hinge
on participation in city vehicle purchases.
Purchase by Employee Auction — Property may be disposed of by employee bids if the following
conditions are met:
1) Notice stating the property to be auctioned, minimum bid if any, who to send
the bids to, and deadline for receipt of bids should be posted at the employee
bulletin boards at City Hall, Public Works building and Fire Department, at
least five business days prior to the opening of the bids;
2) The bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope; and
3) Bids must be kept sealed until after the deadline.
APPENDIX E
TERMS, CONDITIONS
AND INSTRUCTIONS
TO THE SPECIFICATIONS
(Revised r:�e�er 1 )
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL: The bidder shall submit his bid or
proposal (both words have the same meaning herein and are used
interchangeably) on the form furnished by the City of Edina (hereinafter
referred to as the City).
a. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids or any part
as it deems best for the public interest.
b. The proposed bid shall be printed in ink or typed.
C. Prices submitted in the proposal by the bidder for a particular identified
City department shall be construed as prices submitted for all City
departments using like items.
d. In case of difference between written words and figures in a proposal,
the amount stated in written words shall govern.
e. In case the unit price times the number of units differs from the
resulting product amount, the unit price shall govern.
Alterations or erasures must be crossed out and the corrections thereof
printed in ink or typewritten adjacent thereto. The corrections must be
initialed in ink by each person signing the proposal.
g. All bids must comply with and not deviate from the provisions of the
specifications to which this document is attached and as they may be
revised or interpreted by addendums issued by the City (such
specifications, as revised and interpreted by addendums issued by the
City, are herein called the "Specifications "). The Contract, the
Specifications and this document are complementary, and what is
required or provided in any shall be as binding as if required by or
provided in all.
h. Revisions to or interpretations of the Specifications made by the City
shall be by addendum issued prior to the date set for bid opening.
Changes to the proposal once submitted to the City may be cause for
rejection of said proposal.
APPENDIX E (cont.)
2. TIME FOR RECEIVING BIDS: Bids received prior to the time of opening will
be securely kept unopened. The officer whose duty it is to open them will
decide when the specified time has arrived and no bid received thereafter will
be considered. Bids received after the time set for opening will be returned to
the bidder unopened. Such officer shall have no liability for the premature
opening of a bid not properly addressed and identified.
a. Bidders are cautioned that, while telegraphic modifications of bids may
be received as hereinafter provided, such modifications, if not explicit
and if in any sense subject to misinterpretation, shall make the bid so
modified or amended subject to rejection. Bidders should secure
correct information relative to the probable time of arrival and
distribution of mail at the place where the bids are to be opened.
3. WITHDRAWAL OF BIDS: The City shall not be required to physically release
or return to the bidder any bid for the purpose of modification, withdrawal or
any other purpose whatsoever until after the bids are officially opened and no
bid may be withdrawn for a period of forty -five (45) days after the official
opening thereof, and then only by written notification directed to the Director
of Finance of the City, and no notification given prior to bid opening shall be
construed as complying with this requirement.
a. Delivered bids may be modified or withdrawn by written or telegraphic
request dispatched by the bidder in time for delivery in the normal
course of business prior to the time fixed for opening; provided, that
written confirmation of any telegraphic modification or withdrawal
over the signature of the bidder is placed in the mail and postmarked
and acknowledged by the City by signed receipt thereof, prior to the
time set for bid opening; provided further, that any telegraphic requests
shall not reveal the amount of the original or revised bid; provided
further, any written request or written confirmation must be signed in
the same manner by the same person who signed the proposal.
b. All bids shall be held firm until the Contract has been awarded by the
City Council.
4. BIDDER'S EXPERIENCE: Prior to the award of the Contract, the apparent low
bidder, if requested by the Director of Finance shall furnish within five (5)
working days of such request, then current information and data regarding
the bidder's financial resources and organization. The City shall have the
right to take such steps as it deems necessary to determine the ability of the
bidder to perform the work and the bidder shall furnish to the City all such
E -2
APPENDIX E (cont.)
information and data for this purpose as the City may request. The right is
reserved to reject the bid where the available evidence or information does
not satisfy the City that the bidder is qualified to carry out properly the terms
of the proposed Contract. The expertise of the bidder in the particular field of
endeavor must be demonstrated and documented to the full satisfaction of
the City.
5. BID GUARANTEE: The bid must be accompanied by a bid guarantee which
will not be less than ten percent (10 %) of the amount of the bid. The bid
guarantee, at the option of the bidder, may be a certified check, cashier's check
or a bid bond secured by a corporation authorized to contract as a surety in the
State of Minnesota. The bid guarantee shall be made payable to the order of
the City, or, as to a bond, name the City as the benefitted party. Cash deposits
and personal checks will not be accepted. The bid guarantee shall insure the
execution of the Contract and the furnishing of a performance bond by the
successful bidder. No bid will be considered unless it is so guaranteed.
Revised bids, whether forwarded by mail or telegram, if representing an
increase of the original bid, must have the bid guarantee adjusted accordingly,
and in the case of a revision by telegram the envelope containing the adjusted
bid deposit must be postmarked prior to the time set for the opening of bids;
otherwise the revision of the bid will not be considered and the original bid
shall remain in force. The bid guarantee, except those of the two lowest
bidders, will be returned after the required performance bond has been finally
approved by the City and has been delivered to the City fully executed.
6. COLLUSION OF BIDDERS: Collusion between bidders is cause for rejection
of all bids of bidders thus involved.
7. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT; BOND: The successful bidder shall be required
to execute a contract (the "Contract ") and furnish a performance bond in the
full contract price, conditioned as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
574.26, with sureties satisfactory to the City. Said Contract and said bond must
be executed on forms furnished by the City. The City shall send a written
notice of award. The Contract shall be signed by the successful bidder and
returned, together with any required performance bond, within ten (10) days
after the forms have been mailed to the bidder. Upon failure of the successful
bidder, within the time allotted, to execute the Contract, furnish an acceptable
bond, or comply with any other requirements imposed precedent to approval
of the Contract, the bid guarantee requested in the call for bids shall be
forfeited to the City, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages.
a. By submitting a bid, bidder agrees that said liquidated damages shall
cover only the damages sustained by the City from additional
E -3
APPENDIX E (cont.)
administrative costs, expenses of readvertising and rebidding, and
other damages sustained by the City as a result of failure of the
successful bidder to execute the written Contract and furnish a
performance bond when so required, but shall not cover, nor preclude
the City from claiming damages on account of, delay, price changes,
loss of other contracts, loss of income, inability of the City to fulfill
other contracts, loss of other benefits of the Contract, or other damages
directly or consequently arising out of failure of bidder to furnish a
bond or execute and deliver the Contract when required.
8. EXCISE TAXES: Instrumentalities of the State of Minnesota are not subject to
Federal Excise Taxes. Individual certificates will be furnished on request if
needed by the successful bidder to reclaim for himself such charges.
9. MINNESOTA STATE SALES TAX 1RXFA4d12T,1 ka };:• • ^' ^R tia l k' ^s. of }i'^
04 aFe H"-T7h6s:Ci:Jttv is subject to the State of Minnesota sales
tax, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 297A.
10. GUARANTEE: The successful bidder further agrees to guarantee all materials
and parts bid and supplies against inferiority as to specifications, such
guarantee to be unconditional. Failure or neglect of the City to require
compliance with any terms or condition of the Contract or Specifications shall
not be deemed a waiver of such term or condition.
11. DELIVERY: Cost of delivery of materials and supplies to the location
designated by the City is included in said prices. Delivery shall be made only
as called for on duly signed Purchase Orders or Releases referring to the
Contract and issued by the City. It is understood that the City shall be under
no obligation for payment for any supplies or material except on the basis of
said Orders or Releases duly signed and issued. The successful bidder shall
not be responsible for damages caused by delay or failure to perform or
defaults caused by public carriers, or, acts or demands of the government in
time of war or national emergency. Deliveries shall be made inside where
applicable and when so directed.
12. LEGAL RIGHTS TO MATERIAL: The successful bidder hereby guarantees
that it will have full legal right to material delivered under the Contract and
Specifications, and agrees to pay all rents and royalties of every description on
any and all patents or patent rights covering _said material, or covering any
process, machinery or material used in its construction and agrees to
indemnify and save the City entirely harmless from any and all claims,
demands, damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees),
actions, or causes of action, resulting or arising against the City by reason of
E-4
APPENDIX E (cont.)
the construction or delivery of said material or the use of any process,
machinery or material in the construction of same.
13. WITHHOLDING: If the Contract requires the employment of employees for
wages by the bidder, final settlement shall not be made until satisfactory
showing is made of a certificate completed by the Commissioner of Taxation
(State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation, Form 134) indicating
compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 290.92.
14. PAYMENT:
a. The City hereby agrees, in consideration of the covenants and
agreements specified to be kept and performed by the successful bidder,
to pay to the successful bidder when the terms and conditions of the
Contract and Specifications and this document have been fully
completed and fulfilled on the part of the bidder to the satisfaction of
the City, the sum of the contract price.
b. If the contract price is an estimate, no representation as to quantity
shall be construed therefrom, and no guarantee of minimum or
maximum quantity or amount shall be either made or implied. The
City shall neither be compelled to order any quantity of any item nor
limited in the total quantity ordered on any item unless expressly
specified in the Contract.
C. In addition, if the successful bidder shall proceed properly to perform
and complete the terms and conditions of the Specifications, the
Contract and this document, the City, at its discretion, from time to
time as deliveries are made, may grant to the successful bidder an
estimate of the amount then earned, which shall entitle the holder
thereof to receive the amount then due thereon, when the conditions,
if any, annexed to such estimate shall have been complied with. The
granting of such estimate shall not be construed as an acceptance of the
materials or any portion thereof.
d. No increase above said bid price will be allowed to the successful bidder
during the term of the Contract unless and except as provided by the
Specifications.
e. Payment under the Contract will be made in the manner provided by
law for payment of claims against the City.
E -5
APPENDIX E (cont.)
f. In any event, final payment shall not be made until the provisions of
paragraph 13 hereof relative to withholding are complied with, and
until the successful bidder has filed with the City a fully and duly
executed affidavit, general waiver and indemnity agreement in a form
prescribed by the City, together with other evidence as the City may
request, that all labor, materials or services expended and used in
connection with fulfilling the Contract have been paid for in full and
that no liens or other claims can be made or claimed against the City or
its property.
15. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY: In accordance with the City Affirmative
Action Policy and the City Council's policies against discrimination,
Contractor agrees that no person who is a citizen of the United States or a
resident alien, shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, national
origin, age, sex, disability, marital status or public assistance status, be
excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program,
service or activity under the provisions of any and all applicable Federal and
State laws against discrimination. The Contractor will furnish all
information and reports required by the City or by Executive Order No. 11246
and Revised Order No. 4, and by the rules and regulations and order of the
Secretary of Labor for purposes: of investigation to ascertain compliance with
such laws. The violation of this paragraph shall be a misdemeanor. The
successful bidder agrees that the Contract may be cancelled or terminated by
the City, and all money due or to become due under such Contract may be
forfeited, for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions
of this paragraph.
16. INTERPRETATION: The use herein of one gender shall include all genders.
The use herein of the singular shall include the plural. If there be more than
successful bidder which sign the Contract, their liability thereunder and
hereunder and under the Specifications shall be joint and several. If any
section, article, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of the
Contract, the Specifications or this document, is for any reason held to be
invalid or unenforceable as to any person -or circumstance, the application of
such section, article, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase to
persons or circumstances other than those as to which it shall be invalid or
unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and all other provisions of the
Contract, the Specifications and this document, in all other respects, shall be
and remain valid and enforceable.
E-6
Xawrw 4:wl-L
City of gdjfkj�
7
G1
10
I
Z� a. At
o e} 1,
Cn
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Ken Rosland
Date: April 4, 1994
Subject: HOPKINS ARTS FACILITY
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VT_ii.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Attached is a letter from the City of Hopkins which I believe is self — explanatory._
It has been placed on the agenda for your discussion and your action if you deem
it appropriate.
Info /Background
C I T Y O F H O P K I N S
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
March 29, 1994
Dear Mayor
I am writing to you with the hope that you will help us realize our dream of building a
community center for the arts in Hopkins.
For the past two years, the City of Hopkins has facilitated the formation of a coalition of
residents, business, non - profits, arts professionals, nonresidents and members of the
Hopkins School Board who .have contributed to the planning and design of this multi-
use arts and educational facility.
Representative Steve Kelley and Senator Ted Mondale have brought forth requests for
funding from the State as part of the Bonding Bill. We now believe it is important to
show the regional nature of this facility. Enclosed you will find our case statement
which we believe helps explain the necessity of this project to Hopkins and the sur-
rounding communities.
I am writing to ask your support for our project in the form of either or both of the
following:
o A letter of support from you to your legislators or,
o A City Council resolution in support of the arts facility.
Should you choose to assist us, I would appreciate receiving a copy of the letter and/or
resolution which we will use in our lobbing efforts.
As you look through the case statement, I believe you will find that this facility would
provide benefits to the entire western suburban area in that a facility like this does not
exist. Hopkins has shown its commitment to the facility by committing $1.5 million dol-
lars to the project. The major tenant is Childs Play Theater which serves audiences
and youth throughout the western suburbs. Hopkins, in its redevelopment efforts,
1010 First Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 612/935 -8474
An Equal Opportunity Employer
preserve the quality of life in Hopkins, thus, helping to preserve the integrity of the sur-
rounding suburbs.
Please review the enclosed information and let me know as soon as possible what fur-
ther documentation you may need in order to support this effort.
Sincerely,
Charles D. Redepenning
Mayor
arts2
SA TLE
RegolUti032 in Support of Hopkins Arts Facility
whereas, the City of Hopkins wishes to build a Center for the Arts
to encourage economic development and further the education of
children in the arts, and
whereas, the City of Hopkins has shown a need for a regional multipurpose
arts facility, and
Whereas, the strength and vitality of our neighboring communities, includ-
ing Hopkins, is important to the quality of life of the region,
and
Whereas, the City of Hopkins has built a coalition of support from neigh-
borhood groups, businesses, school board members, nonresidents,
and
Whereas, the City of Hopkins has committed $1.5 million towards this proj-
ect, and
Whereas, the City of Hopkins has requested $750,000 of funding from the
State of Minnesota.
Now be it resolved by the City of supports the efforts of the
state of Minnesota to provide funding all or a portion of the city
of 'Hopkins' request.
sample Letter of support For Regional Arts Facility
Charles Redepenning, Mayor
City of Hopkins
1010 First Street South
Hopkins, HN 55343
Dear Mayor Redepenning,
1 am writing to state my support for Hopkins' proposal to build a Center for
the Arts.
It has been shown that this center will serve purpose by responding to the
needs of artists going public as well as by providing a unique opportunity for
economic development.
I understand Hopkins has requested financial assistance in the construction of
this facility. I would support efforts by the State of Minnesota to provide
assistance to Hopkins.
sincerely,
Mayor
=nPIGNIS AREA ARTS FACILITY
NEEDS STATEMENT
The Hopkins City Council has committed S1.5 million towards the construction, of a S2.5 to S3 million
publicly owned arts facility. This commitment is supported by the following urgent needs:
o Redevelop Blighted Prn erty
The site in question is located in downtown Hopkins and represents the former Suburban
Chevrolet site. This site is currently vacant and underutilized.
o Stimulate Ptiv to Development
The arts facility wM act as an incentive to redevelop the remainder of the Suburban; Chevrolet
property. Uses which have been discussed include a movie theater, restaurant, office complex and
a mixed use residential/retail project. The private redevelopment of this site is expected to double
property taxes which are currently paid by this site.
o Reverse Decline in Market Values
vfaricet values in downtown Hopkins have decreased by approximately 3% to 5% over the past
three years. The construction of the arts facility and the private redevelopment of the Suburban
Chevrolet property are expected to reverse this decline.
o Reverse Decline in Jobs
The -Mmesota Department of Jobs and Training statistics show a steady decrease in jobs in the
Ciry from 13,351 in 1980 to 12,250 in 1990. The construction of the arts facility and the private
redevelopment of the property will produce new jobs.
o Produce Economic Spin -o
It is estimated the tenants and patrons of the arts facility would help to produce an estimated
3900,000 in economic spin -off for Hopkins and the region per year.
o Sere Remonal and Local Arts Needs
Based upon an arts nerds assessment conduced by the City, the facIry will serve arts needs
regionally as well as locally. Two local theatrical organizations - Cbild's Play Theatre and
14=etonkca Dance Theater and School - are anticipated to be tenants of the fatality. Also,
Hopkins School District ,4017270 may participate in the use of the facility for various school related
functions and general arcs educasioa. It is esti a =ed the use of the arts fataiiry will attract 30,000
to 100,000 people annually.
o Sup ort For the Arts Facdito
Locally, there is broad base support for the construction of the arts facility. This parallels
'L 6=sota as a whole which strongly supports the arts. For example, more dollars are spent on
the arts in vlinaesom than professional sports.
Im
n
1!4
All"
1.7
Fj
i3l
7i
. - 1� .
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$335.48
ACME WINDOW CLEAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
008549
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
144570
$335.48*
04/04/94
$199.42
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
3815
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
144571
$199.42*
04/04/94
$460.53
ADIRONDACK DIRECT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
356611
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3017
144572
$460.53*
04/04/94
$206.47
ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
ALARM SERVICE
11292665
ED BUILDING &
ALARM SERVICE
3379
04/04/94
593.03
ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
ALARM SERVICE
11292663
CENTENNIAL LAK
ALARM SERVICE
144573
$299.50*
04/04/94
$159.03
ALARM PRODUCTS DISTRIB
REPAIR PARTS
56689'
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94
$26.63
ALARM PRODUCTS DISTRIB
DIALER PARTS
56794
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3041
04/04/94
$244.51
ALARM PRODUCTS DISTRIB
DIALER
56407_
PUMP & LIFT ST.REPAIR
PARTS
144574
$430.17*
04/04/94
$248.79
ALLIED PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
40695
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
144575
$248.79*
04/04/94
$394.05
ALPHAGRAPHICS
PRINTING
20378
POOL TRACK GRE
PRINTING
144576
$394.05*
04/04/94
$159.17
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
031594
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
144577
$159.17*
04/04/94
$739.66
AMERIDATA
LASERPRINTER
446763
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIP REPLACEM
3310
04/04/94
$564.19
AMERIDATA
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
446762
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
2930
144578
$1,303.85*
04/04/94
$280.00
ANDERSON, ERIC
GFOA CONFERENCE
032494
FINANCE
CONF & SCHOOLS
144579
$280.00*
04/04/94
$202.35
ANN'S TOOL SUPPLY
TOOLS
8761
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
3.152
04/04/94
.$52.83
ANN'S TOOL SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8753
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
2976
144580
$255.18*
04/04/94
$66.42
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
REPAIR PARTS
L50237A
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3145
144581
$66.42*
04/04/94
$131.94
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
03159910
ARENA CONCESSI
CST'OF GD FOOD
8370
144582
$131.94*
04/04/94
$19.06
AXT, LYLE
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
032294
GUN RANGE
CST OF GD FOOD
14,4583
$19.06*
04/04/94
$1,450.00
BARRY SIEWERT CREATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
7000N
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
144584
$1,450.00*
04/04/94
$583.41
-
BAUER BUILT INC
REPAIR PARTS
297984
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2563
144585
$583.41*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$102.00
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
53381
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144586
$102.00*
04/04/94
$57.20
BENN, BRADLEY
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144587
$57.20*
04/04/94
$168.75
BENZINGER, KELLY
SKATING INSTRUCTOR E
032394
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
144588
$168.75*
04/04/94
$944.85
BERG BAG COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27124
PONDS & LAKES
GENERAL SUPPLI
2889
144589
-
$944.85*
04/04/94
$222.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD L
031503
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GO LIQU
04/04/94
$205.90
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD L
031502
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
04/04/94
$130.89
BERGFORD TRUCKING
COST OF GOODS SOLD L
031501
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GO LIQU
144590
$559.29*
04/04/94
$472.31
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1177740
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$141.82
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1177750
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$123.88
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1177770
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$7.92
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1179090
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$38.87
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1178650
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$6.16
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
PLOTTER PEN
1157060
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$132.79
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1185470
FIRE.DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3080
04/04/94
$70.84
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
answering machine
1177741
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$40.17
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1187970
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
04/04/94
$42.69
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1207110
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
144591
$1,077.45*
04/04/94
$47.50
BLAKE, - ROLLAND
REFUND DISCOUNT CARD
032294
GOLF PROG
GOLF DOME RECP
144592
$47.50*
04/04/94
$10.00
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
BANK SERVICE CHARGE
032194
GOLF PROG
MISCELLANOUS
04/04/94
$4.25
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
032194
CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPPL
04/04/94
$5.79
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
COURSE BEAUTIFICATION
032194
GRILL
COURSE BEAUTIF
04/04/94
$6.38
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
REPAIR PARTS
032194
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94_
$174.43
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
032194
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
144593
$200.85*
04/04/94
$422.88
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS IN
FIELD LINE
08251
FIELD MAINTENA
INFIELD MIX
3204
144594
$422.88*
04/04/94
$15.00
BURTIS, ROBERT
PERFORMANCE EB 4/21
0421
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144595
$75.00*
04/04/94
$53.23
CABIN FEVER SPORTING G
GENERAL SUPPLIES
032894
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
144596
$53.23*
04/04/94
$50.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
032994
FINANCE
MILEAGE
144597
$50.00*
04/04/94
$363.17
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
59.515
POOL TRACK GRE
PRINTING
144598
$363.17*
. L .
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 3
CHECK NO
=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
04/04/94
$171.57
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
338857
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94
$59.26
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
338230
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3121
144599
$230.83*
04/04/94
$47.00
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
031094
SKATING RINK M
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$18.00
CELLULAR ONE
TELEPHONE
032194
ADMINISTRATION
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$79.43
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$24.50
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$33.42
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
PATROL
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$54.64
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$24.50
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
PATROL
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$10.60
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
PATROL
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$10.60
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONE
032194/P
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$59.60
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
032194/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
04/04/94
$92.35
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
032194/F
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
144600
$454.64*
04/04/94
$568.72
CELLULAR ONE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
008552
INSPECTIONS
EQUIP REPLACEM
04/04/94,
$1,137.42
CELLULAR ONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
007997.
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
144601
$1,706.14*
04/04/94
$29.72
CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIE
CRAFT SUPPLIES
18705
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
3232
144602
$29.72*
04/04/94
$139.20
CHEM CONCEPTS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
0625
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
3489
04/04/94
$161.03
CHEM CONCEPTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0622
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
144603
$300.23*
04/04/94
$64.00
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
76218
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$25.50
CITY BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B
76184
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144604
$89.50*
04/04/94
$151.00
CITY OF RICHFIELD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
032394
SPECIAL ACTIVI
PROF SERVICES
144605
$151.00*
04/04/94
$45.84
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
12949
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2755
144606
$45.84*
04/04/94
$74.25
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
926534
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$100.30
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
00855568
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$181.65
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
00860105
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$101.20
COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
COST OF GOODS SOLD
M
00908763
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144607
$457.40*
04/04/94
$161.00
COCKRIEL, VINCE
CONT ED
021094
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
144608
$161.00*
04/04/94
$2,856.78
COEP, REGIS
REFUND OVERPAYMENT
W
032494
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
144609
$2,856.78*
04/04/94
$650.00
COMPUTER TRAINING INTE
COMPUTER PROGRAM
030994
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
144610
$650.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 4
CHECK NO
-- DATE
- - - - --
CHECK - AMOUNT
--
- - - - -- VENDOR
---------- -
- - - -- DESCRIPTION
-- - - - - --
INVOICE
- -
- - -- PROGRAM
- - - --
OBJECT
---- - - - -PO
-NUM.
04/04/94
$30.00
CONNOLLY, BOB
PERFORMANCE EB 4/17
0210
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144611
$30.00*
04/04/94
$718.88
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
22876
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
144612
$718.88*
04/04/94
$50.19
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0374744
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3313
04/04/94
$24.07
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0374687
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3307
144613
$74.26*
04/04/94
$179.50
COURSEKEEPERS
CART INFO SIGNS
1031
GOLF CARS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3363
144614
$179.50*
04/04/94
$3.75
COX, JEFF
INSPECTION EXPENSES
031694
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
144615
$3.75*
04/04/94
$289.37
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT
LAB SUPPLIES
3173269
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
3148
144616
$289.37*
04/04/94
$31.68
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
63551
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94
$63.07
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
63428
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3117
04/04/94
$30.64
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
63382
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
144617
$125.39*
04/04/94
$105.55
D.C. HEY CO..
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
384630
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
04/04/94
$31.50
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
3856191
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQUI
144618
$137.05*
04/04/94
$72.33
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
TOOLS
46646
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
3153
144619
$72.33*
04/04/94
$4,715.82
DAYSTARTER
BATTERIES
03590
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
2828
144620
$4,715.82*
04/04/94
$141.65
DE- SIGN ER
PAINT
000107
STREET NAME SI
PAINT
2961
144621
$141.65*
04/04/94
$3,554.50
DELTA DENTAL
HOSPITALIZATION
701
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
144622
$3,554.50*
04/04/94
$49.20
DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DI
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
119050
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
3228
144623
$49.20*
04/04/94
$111.36
DON'S APPLIANCE & TELE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
23140
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
3089
04/04/94
$394.00
DON'S APPLIANCE & TELE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
23084
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
3087
144624
$505.36*
04/04/94
$6,834.97
DORSEY & WHITNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERV -
356808
LEGAL SERVICES
PRO SVC - LEGA
144625
$6,834.97*
04/04/94
$1,539.63
DPC INDUSTRIES
WATER TREATMENT SUPP
01027343
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU
6915
144626
$1,539.63*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 5
CHECK NO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
04/04/94
$233.73
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
0664314
RANGE �
REPAIR
PARTS
3251
04/04/94
$185.78
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
667875
GOLF CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
3431
144627
$419.51*
04/04/94
$649.00
E.A.H. SCHMIDT & ASSOC
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN
16365
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
144628
$649.00*
04/04/94
$306.62
E.J. WINTERS INC
REPAIR PARTS
5612
SEWER CLEANING
REPAIR
PARTS
3218
144629
$306.62*
04/04/94
$1,974.60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
336994
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
04/04/94
$58.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
336944
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
04/04/94
$559.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
336942
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,945.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
336944
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
04/04/94
$21.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
339870
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
04/04/94
$2,477.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
339923
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
04/04/94
.$2,421.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
339870
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,278.65
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
339868
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS BEE
144630
$10,736.50*
04/04/94
$106.50
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
2302512
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
144631
$106.50*
04/04/94
$1,655.41
ED KRAEMER & SONS INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
43571
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
144632
$1,655.41*
04/04/94
$68.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
WP5.1 CLASS
031794
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF &
SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$68.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
031794
INSPECTIONS
CONF &
SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$136.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
031794
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$68.00
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
031794
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF &
SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$11,201.05
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
BUS RENTAL SWIM PROG
032494
SWIMMING INSTR
BUS RENTAL
144633
$11,541.05*
-
04/04/94
$98.80
EILERS, JOYCE
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144634
$98.80*
04/04/94
$300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL SUPPLIES
040494
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL
SUPPLI
144635
5300.00*
04/04/94
$63.75
ENGER, DON
CONT ED /POLICE
032194
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF &
SCHOOLS
144636
$63.75*
04/04/94
$60.00
ENGSTROM, ROBIN
CLASS REFUND EB
0316
EDINB/CL PROG
LESSON
PRGM IN
144637
-
$60.00*
04/04/94
$475.00
EXPLORERS POST 925
CAR WASH
032994
EQUIPMENT OPER
CAR WASH
144638
$475.00*
04/04/94
$595.21
FADDEN PUMP COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
62260
SEWER CLEANING
REPAIR
PARTS
3124
144639
$595.21*
04/04/94
$18.10
FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO
ADVERTISING OTHER
14608
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT
OTHER
COUNCIL.CHECK
REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- - - - -- DESCRIPTION
------ - - - - --
- INVOICE
- -
-- -- PROGRAM - - --
OBJECT
-----------------------
PO NUM.
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
04j04/94
-
$28.73
---
- - - - --
FAST 1 HOUR
----------
PHOTO
ADVERTISING
14695
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
144640
$46.83"
04/04/94
$93.75
FELINSKI, JENNIFER
SKATING INSRUCTION E
032394
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
144641
$93.75*
04/04/94
$30.00
FIALA, DEBORAH
CLASS REFUND EB
031894
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
144642
$30.00*
04/04/94
$25.00
FINE, AGNES
ART PROGRAM EB 4/12
0210
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144643
-
$25.00*
04/04/94
$400.00
FIRST TRUST
ADMIN FEE
032194
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PROF SERVICES
144644
$400.00*
04/04/94
$105.00
FLOYD LOCK &
SAFE CO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
136903
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
04/04/94
$111.83
FLOYD LOCK &
SAFE CO
ALARM SERVICE
135549
ARENA BLDG /GRO
ALARM SERVICE
144645
$216.83*
04/04/94
$30.00
FOREMAN, DENNIS
REFUND COACH PITCH
032894
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F.
144646
$30.00*
04/04/94
$62.23
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
804050
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3254
144647
$62.23*
04/04/94
$25.36
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
188069
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
144648
$25.36*
04/04/94
$1,985.00
G.L. CONTRACTING INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
30368
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
3202
144649
$1,985.00*
04/04/94
$760.00
G.V. LARSEN
& ASSOC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
032594
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
144650
$760.00*
04/04/94
$120.00
GADEN, MELANIE
PT OFFICE ADM ART CE
032994
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144651
-
$120.00*
04/04/94
$874.55
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
19
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH REMOVA
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
$134.94
$425.84
GALLAGHER'S
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
APRIL
19
19
GUN RANGE
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
04/04/94
$50.59
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
19
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
$70.74
GALLAGHER'S
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
APRIL
19
19
GOLF DOME
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH REMOVA
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
04/04/94
$25.56
$228.89
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
APRIL
19
19
CLUB HOUSE
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH REMOVA
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
04/04/94
$70.26
$292.36
GALLAGHER'S
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
19
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
$135.79
GALLAGHER'S
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
APRIL
19
19
CITY HALL GENE
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOVA
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
04/04/94
$50.04
$103.14
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
19
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH REMOVA
04/04/94
$292.37
GALLAGHER'S
SERVICES
I RUBBISH REMOVAL
APRIL
19
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH REMOVA
144652
$2,755.07*
1
04/04/94
$367.00
GANZER DIST
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD 6
178041
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 7
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------r-------------------------------
04/04/94
$1,821.50
GANZER DIST INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
178043
50TH ST.SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144653
$2,188.50*
04/04/94
$122.40
GARDER,.DOUG
PROF SERV ART CENTER
032994
ART CENTER ADM'PROF
SERVICES
144654
$122.40*
04/04/94
$44.95
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO -97
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
149999
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
144655
$44.95*
04/04/94
$710.75
GEREBI, LIZ
SKATING INSTRUCTION
030394
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
144656
$710 ".75*
04/04/94
$75.00
GLEN HELGESON
EB MUSIC PROGRAM 4/1
0202
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144657
$75.00*
04/04/94
$50.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVIC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
940323
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
144658
$50.00*
04/04/94
$907.38
GOLFCRAFT
REPAIR PARTS
2853
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94
$360.00
GOLFCRAFT
REPAIR PARTS
2856
RANGE
REPAIR PARTS
3367
144659
$1,267.38*
04/04/94
$71.00
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
REGISTER MAINT
14700
RANGE
CONTR REPAIRS
3011
144660
$71.00*
04/04/94
$269.80
GRAB -IT ENTERPRIZES
TOOLS
02051
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
3359
144661
$269.80*
04/04/94
$245.00
GRAPP, JEAN
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144662
$245.00*
04/04/94
$83.79
GREENLEAF INC
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144663
$83.79*
04/04/94
$207.68
GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMEN
TOOLS
18904
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
3322
04/04/94
$144.73
GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18855
MOWING
GENERAL SUPPLI
2424
144664
$352.41*
04/04/94
$1,000.00
GTA INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
EPCL94 -0
CENTENNIAL LAK
PROF SERVICES
144665
$1,000.00*
04/04/94
$773.10
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
LUBRICANTS
263348
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
2877
144666
$773.10*
04/04/94
$38.00
HAMSTRA, RENEE
CLASS REFUND
031694
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
144667
$38.00*
04/04/94
$750.00
HANSON, MICHAEL
PROGRAMMING
94001
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
144668
$750.00*
04/04/94
$25.00
HAPPY FACES
EB ART PROGRAM 4/7
0210
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144669
$25.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 8
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
-- DESCRIPTION --
-- --- - - - - --
INVOICE -
- - - -- PROGRAM
-----------
OBJECT - -PO
- - - - --
NUM.
- - - - --
-------------------------------
04/04/94
$108.79
- - -
- -- --------
- - --
HEDGES, DIANA
- - - -
CRAFT SUPPLIES ART C
032994
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
04/04/94
$77.70
HEDGES, DIANA.
CRAFT SUPPLIES
032994
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
144670
$186.49*
04/04/94
$224.05
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
8784
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GO FOOD
3378
144671
$224.05*
04/04/94
$624.72
HENNEPIN COUNTY
SHERIF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
032494
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
144672
$624.72*
- 04/04/94
$143.14
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASU
TREASU
MICRO FICHE
MICRO FICHE
030794
030794
ASSESSING
ASSESSING
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$71.59
144673
$214.73*
04/04/94
$2,149.12
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASU
POSTAGE
030794
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
144674
$2,149.12*
04/04/94
$5,446.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASU
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
002375
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
144675
$5,446.00*
04/04/94
$78.01
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT
0351380
50th LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLI
0823
144676
$78.01*
04/04/94
$16.45
HOME JUICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
GOODS SOLD M
64224
64225
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$44.41
HOME JUICE
COST OF
144677
$60.86*
04/04/94
$139.19
HORIZON CHEMICAL
CO IN
CHEMICALS
40621
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
3463
144678
$139.19*
04/04/94
$2,926.83
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METE
000676.6
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3186
04/04/94
$2,785.56
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METERS
INVENTORY WATER METE
0006764
0006765
UTILITY PROG
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
INVENTORY WATE
2109
3165
04/04/94
$2,603.34
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
144679
$8,315.73*
04/04/94
$60.00
HYTJAN, STEVE
REFUND COACH PITCH
032994
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
144680
$60.00*
04/04/94
$30.00
I.A.F.C.
FLSA RESOURCE GUIDE
0315
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PAMPHL
144681
$30.00*
04/04/94
$115.00
IAAO
DUES PEDERSON
777900
ASSESSING
PROF SERVICES
144682
$115.00*
04/04/94
$950.95
JAFFEE, JAY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
032194
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
144683
$950.95*
04/04/94
$116.10
JERRYS PRINTING
PERMITS
D6312
PARK ADMIN.
PRINTING .
144684
$116.10*
04/04/94
$104.16
JOHNSON, NAOMI
NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
032994
032994
ART CENTER ADM
ART CENTER.ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$67.55
JOHNSON,
144685
$171.71*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 9
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.'
04/04/94
$33.01
JOHNSTONS SALES & SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
K97664
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3368
04/04/94
$29.30
JOHNSTONS SALES & SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
312060
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
3084
144686
$62.31*
04/04/94
$153.00
JONES, JENNY
SKATING INSTRUCTOR
032394
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
144687
$153.00*
04/04/94
$377.75
JR JOHNSON SUPPLY
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
30647
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
3428
04/04/94
$83.46
JR JOHNSON SUPPLY
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
33135
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
3314
04/04/94
$242.86
JR JOHNSON SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
33272
GENERAL TURF C
GENERAL SUPPLI
3300
144688
$704.07*
04/04/94
$712.50
JR'S OPTIC INSPECTIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1383
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3305
144689
$712.50*
04/04/94
$20.00
JULIEN, DIANE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
032494
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$1.25
JULIEN, DIANE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
032494
PARK MAINTENAN
MILEAGE
04/04/94
$15.00
JULIEN, DIANE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOL
032494
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/04/94
$44.50
JULIEN, DIANE
LICENSES & PERMITS
032494
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
144690
$80.75*
04/04/94
$32.00
JULIEN, DIANE
WEARING SHOES
032894
STREET CLEANIN
WEARING SHOES
04/04/94
$2.14
JULIEN, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
032894
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
144691
$34.14*
04/04/94
$31.90
KEPRIOS, JOHN
ADAPTOR
032194
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
144692
$31.90*
04/04/94
$42.64
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
094854
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
3255
04/04/94
$22.27
KNOX COMM CREDIT,
GENERAL SUPPLIES
093716
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$93.18
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
094827
BUILDING MAINT-LUMBER
3151
04/04/94
$50.19
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
093495
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
3042
04/04/94
$14.89
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
093495
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
3057'
144693
$223.17*
04/04/94
$417.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
102003
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$897.85
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
101965
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$939.20
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
102412
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$97.45
KUETHER DIST. CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
102491
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
144694
$2,351.50*
04/04/94
$281.25
LAHET, TARA
SKATING INSTRUCTION
032394
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
144695
$281.25*
04/04/94
$30.00
LARSON, JOHN C
REFUND GIFT CERTIFIC
032194
GOLF PROG
GOLF DOME RECP
144696
$30.00*
04/04/94
$427.89
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1005317
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2782
04/04/94
- $147.44
LAWSON PRODUCTS
OVERPAYMENT 989550
0989548
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$487.18
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
1008845
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2873
144697
$767.63*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$14,949.20
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18910
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
2947
04/04/94
$457.95
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
REPAIR PARTS
18913
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
9272
04/04/94
$450.00
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
18911
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
3223
04/04/94
$133.13
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
REPAIR PARTS
18912
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3222
04/04/94
$303.53
LAYNE MINNESOTA
CO.
PUMP PARTS
18914
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3294
144698
$16,293.81*
04/04/94
$38.04
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
471412
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
144699
$38.04*
- 04/04/94
$447.00
LENKER, JOHN OR
BONNIE
REFUND AMBULANCE CHA
940129
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
144700
$447.00*
04/04/94
$79.96
LENZ, STEVE
CONT ED /ENGINEERING
032994
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
144701
$79.96*
04/04/94
$681.65
LESCO INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
9RA029A
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3170
144702
$681.65*
04/04/94
$134.00
LITMAN, CASANDRA
REFUND SWIMMING & TE
031894
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
144703
$134.00*
04/04/94
$60.00
LONG, JEFF
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
032294
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCRI
144704
$60.00*
04/04/94
$70.00
LUND, KAREN
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144705
$70.00*
04/04/94
$317.49
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27584
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$167.10
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27552
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$334.20
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27513
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$233.94
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27431
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$200.52
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27432
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$300.78
M AMUNDSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
27341
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144706
$1,554.03*
04/04/94
$89.87
M.A.B. ENTERPRISES INC
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
45482
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3075
144707
$89.87*
04/04/94
$282.00
MAIER STEWART &
ASSOCI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
12350
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
144708
$282.00*
04/04/94
$100.00
MALMSERG, DAVID
performance eb 4/26
013194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144709
$100.00*
04/04/94
$969.15
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
227092
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$2,098.05
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
227151
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$574.70
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
227090
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$13.60
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
229611
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$1,757.05
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
229610
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$2,097.50
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
229560
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$21.90
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
229609
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$224.25
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
231830
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 11
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------7-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
5563.35
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 229558
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$18.95
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
B 229631
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
.144710
$8,338.50*
04/04/94
$99.84
MARSTON, ELLIOTT
CONT ED /HEALTH
032994
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF & SCHOOLS
144711
$99.84*
04/04/94
$115.00
MASTER ELECTRIC CO INC
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
14730
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
144712
$115.00*
04/04/94
$300.74
MCC /MIDWEST
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F 89426
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
3231
144713
$300.74*
04/04/94
$974.48
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU
00010649
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
3167
144714
$974.48*
04/04/94
$603.32
MECO
REPAIR PARTS
62309
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2696
144715
$603.32*
04/04/94
$97.75
MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN-
HOSPITALIZATION
1173511
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
04/04/94
$24,318.30
MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN
HOSPITALIZATION
1172690
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
144716
$24,416.05*
04/04/94
$27,880.81
MEDICA CHOICE
HOSPITALIZATION
91102386
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
144717
$27,880.81*
04/04/94
$1,783.88
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
35658
CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPPL
3163
04/04/94
$788.10
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
35658
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
3163
04/04/94
$479.25
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35658
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
3163
04/04/94
$1,959.60
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35658
LITTER REMOVAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
3163
04/04/94
$479.25
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35658
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3163
04/04/94
$947.85
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
35701
SKATING RINK M
REPAIR PARTS
_
04/04/94
$467.10
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
35656
ED BUILDING &
CLEANING SUPPL
3320
04/04/94
$496.61
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
35693
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
3427
144718
$7,401.64*
04/04/94
$298.50
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
F 374
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF GD FOOD
144719
$298.50*
04/04/94
$35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
TITLE FEES
413109
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
3242
144720
$35.00*
04/04/94
$255,213.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
50500494
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC METR
144721
$255,213.00*
04/04/94
$281.16
MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
065151
FIELD MAINTENA
GENERAL SUPPLI
3203
.144722
$281.16*
04/04/94
$12.24
MINN COMM PAGING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
00000394
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
144723
$12.24*
04/04/94
$4,036.26
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
04/04/94
$3,900.81
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$117.05
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
04/04/94
$189.60
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
04/04/94
$257.55
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
04/04/94
$700.60
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
CENTENNIAL LAK
HEAT
04/04/94
$9,227.81
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
GOLF DOME
HEAT
04/04/94
$230.40
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
04/04/94
$574.35
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
04/04/94
$3,830.88
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
04/04/94
$901.09
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
04/04/94
$1,077.90
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
- 04/04/94
$3,434.58
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
ED BUILDING &
HEAT
04/04/94
$643.96
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
04/04/94
$1,333.61
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
04/04/94
$2,158.70
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040494
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
144725
$32,615.15*
04/04/94
$65.00
MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPP
CRAFT SUPPLIES
158668
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
2924
144726
$65.00*
04/04/94
$169.82
MINNESOTA CONWAY
REPAIR PARTS
10011346
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
144727
$169.82*
04/04/94
$20.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0
2 BIKE LICENSES
032894
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
144728
$20.00*
04/04/94
$100.00
MINNESOTA MEETINGS & E
ADVERTISING
6089
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
3362
144729
$100.00*
04/04/94
$44.00
MINNESOTA MINI STORAGE
STORAGE
031794
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
144730
$44.00*
04/04/94
$166.85
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP
repair clamps
12253
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
1255
144731
$166.85*
04/04/94
$17.38
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
ADVERTISING LEGAL
11619
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/04/94
$78.74
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
CDBG PROGRAM
11618
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/04/94
$52.89
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
BIDS CHEMICALS
11681
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/04/94
$88.51
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
BIDS CONTRACT 94 -2
11680
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/04/94
$25.28
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT
ADVERTISING LEGAL
11683
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
144732
$262.80*
04/04/94
$94.32
MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO
REPAIR PARTS
404185
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3430
144733
$94.32*
-
04/04/94
$271.81
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
4030383
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
04/04/94
$103.29
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
4030459
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
144734
$375.10*
04/04%94
$330.00
MITCHELL, MARTIN OR MA
REFUND AMBULANCE CHA
932607
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
144735
$330.00*
04/04/94
$18,253.00
MN DEPARTMENT OF REVEN
WATER CONNECTION FEE
032894
WATER TREATMEN
PRO SVC OTHER
144736
$18,253.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 13
CHECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
04/04/94
-$2.75
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
148868
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
04/04/94
$22.98
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
148800
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
04/04/94
$37.56
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
148452
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GDS MIX
04/04/94
$35.80
MN. BAR
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
148481
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
144737
$93.59*
04/04/94
$65.00
MN. ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
30376
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR
EQUI
144738
$65.00*
04/04/94
$50.10
MN. WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
20850IN
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
144739
$50.10*
04/04/94
$15.00
MN /S.C.I.A.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
032294
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES &
SUBSCRI
144740
$15.00*
04/04/94
$67.00
MORGAN, BRUCE
REFUND OVERPAID SOCC
032294
GOLF PROG
DOME RENTAL
144741
$67.00*
04/04/94
$6,757.12
MPLS FINANCE DEPARTMEN
WATER PURCHASED
44720023
DISTRIBUTION
WATER
PURCHASE
144742
$6,757.12*
04/04/94
$78.00
MRPA
DUES SUE WEIGLE -
032394
PARK ADMIN.
DUES &
SUBSCRI
04/04/94
$78.00
MRPA
DUES ANN KATTREH
032394
ED ADMINISTRAT
DUES &
SUBSCRI
144743
$156.00*
04/04/94
$138.95
MUFFLER CLINIC & BRAKE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
44572
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR
REPAIRS
3206
144744
$138.95*
04/04/94
$210.00
MUNICI -PALS
MEETING EXPENSE
032894
CONTINGENCIES
MEETING EXPENS
144745
$210.00*
04/04/94
$231.11
MUNICILITE CO
REPAIR PARTS
5383
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
3158
144746
$231.11*
04/04/94
$43.00
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
10021331
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT
OTHER
04/04/94
$57.48
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ
10023051
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
144747
$100.48*
04/04/94
$652.07
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
223686
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD FOOD
04/04/94
- $23.16
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
CREDIT
735425
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD FOOD
04/04/94
$404.07
NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
258563
ARENA CONCESSI
CST OF
GD FOOD
8366
144748
$1,032.98*
04/04/94
$245.00
NITE NOTES
ART WORK SOLD
032994
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
144749
$245.00*
04/04/94
$4,400.21
NORTH STAR TURF
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081036
GC CIP
CIP
04/04/94
$8,163.23
NORTH STAR TURF
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081315
GC CIP
CIP
04/04/94
$4,206.93
NORTH STAR TURF
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081035
GC CIP
CIP
04/04/94
$94.68
NORTH STAR TURF
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081307
GC CIP
CIP
04/04/94
$94.68
NORTH STAR TURF
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
081308
GC CIP
CIP
04/04/94
$4,142.85
NORTH STAR TURF
UTILITY CART
081314
MAINT OF COURS
CIP
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
-- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - --
INVOICE -
- - - -- PROGRAM - - - --
OBJECT---- - - - -PO
-NUM.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$1,634.78
- - - - --
NORTH STAR TURF
- -
SEED
081038
GENERAL TURF C
SEED
2370
144750
$22,737.36*
04/04/94
$36.42
NORTHERN AIRE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
8927
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
144751
$36.42*
04/04/94
$21.67
NORTHERN
CLAMP
202753TI
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
2997
144752
$21.67*
04/04/94
$27.90
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
84124
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
- 04/04/94
$73.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
84125
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$72.60
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
84667
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$37.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
84664
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
144753
$210.90*
04/04/94
$163.47
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP
COST OF
GOODS SOLD.F
216780
ART SUPPLY GIF
CST OF GD FOOD
2928
144754
$163.47*
04/04/94
$22,111.67
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER -
0319
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT & POWER
04/04/94
$3,082.85
NSP
LIGHT &
LIGHT &
POWER
POWER
0319
040494
ST LIGHTING OR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
04/04/94
04/04/94
$7.40
$147.82
NSP
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
040494
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
04/04/94
$763.36
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
040494
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT & POWER
04/04/94
$21.02
NSP
LIGHT &
LIGHT &
POWER
POWER
040494
040494
TANKS TOWERS &
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
04/04/94
04/04/94
$22.15
$30.08
NSP
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
040494
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT & POWER
144755
$26,186.35*
04/04/94
$638.45
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
031994
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT & POWER
144756
$638.45*
04/04/94
$277.80
NYSTROM PUBLISHING
A.R.L.E
BROCHURE
11712B
PARK ADMIN.
PRINTING
144757
$277.80*
04/04/94
$80.00
OESTREICH, RICHARD
MPCA WASTE
WATER SCH
031794
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
144758
$80.00*
04/04/94
$78.05
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM
SWITCH
BOX /CABLE
223614
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3187
144759
$78.05*
04/04/94
$377.50
ORVIS, JOAN
SKATING
LESSONS
031694
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC OTHER
144760
$377.50*
04/04/94
$186.20
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL
PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE
SERVICE
031294
031294
FIRE DEPT. GEN
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
04/04/94
04/04/94
$36.00
$216.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE
031294
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
144761
$438.20*
04/04/94
$140.55
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
GOODS SOLD M
GOODS.SOLD M
18296107
17796304
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$72.10
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF
144762
$212.65*
04/04/94
$18.95
PERFORMANCE DIMENSION
MOAB
031594
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PAMPHL
:COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 15
i
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144763
518.95*
04/04/94
$5,093.00
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONT
TEE OASIS LANDSCAPE
032594
MAINT OF COORS
SHARED MAINT
144764
$5,093.00*
04/04/94
$80.00
PHILLIPS, RAY
MPCA WASTE WATER SCH
031794
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
144765
$80.00*
04/04/94
$59.95
PHYSICIANS' DESK REFER
BOOKS /POLICE
032994
POLICE DEPT. G
BOOKS & PAMPHL
144766
$59.95*
04/04/94
$118.22
PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3907
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
3493
144767
$118.22*
04/04/94
$241.54
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1- 473660
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3033
144768
$241.54*
04/04/94
$17.95
POLICE MARKSMAN ASSOCI
DUES /POLICE—
032994
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCRI
144769
$17.95*
04/04/94
$75.00
PONZIO, RICK
PERFORMANCE ES 4/7/9
013194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144770
$75.00*
04/04/94
$2,000.00
POSTMASTER
REPLENISH BUSINESS R
032994
GENERAL(BILLIN
POSTAGE
144771
$2,000.00*
04/04/94
$628.35
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
REMOVAL OF DISEASED
032594
Tree removal 3
CIP
04/04/94
$814.73
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
REMOVAL DISEASED ELM
032994
Tree removal 3
CIP
144772
$1,443.08*
04/04/94
$1,101.21
PRECISION TURF /CHEM
SOD & BLACK DIRT
00004105
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
3316
144773
$1,101.21*
04/04/94
$50.00
PRIN, STEVE
MUSIC PROGRAM EB 411
020294
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144774
$50.00*
04/04/94
$175.00
PROFILE EVALUATION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
12 -3116
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
144775
$175.00*
04/04/94
$94.87
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
57210
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3143
144776
$94.87*
04/04/94
$490.97
REDWOOD SIGNS BY HORNI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
001631
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3014
04/04/94
$133.92
REDWOOD SIGNS BY HORNI
SIGNS
001633
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3252
144777
$624.89*
04/04/94
$492.03
REM SUPPLIES
LIGHT BULBS
4083
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
3491
144,778
$492.03*
04/04/94
$840.56
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
83352
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,766.40
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
82567
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,313.81
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
82568
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,207.05
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
82878
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 16
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO-NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
- $66.25
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
022894
50TH ST ,SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,550.55
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
83355
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$52.35
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
83354
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$1,204.02
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
83356
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$24.35
REX DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
83356
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
144779
$7,892.84*.
04/04/94
$159.80
RICHFIELD'PLUMBING CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
9130
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
3465
144780
$159.80*
-
- 04/04/94
$167.23
RITEWAY MOTOR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
209489 -M
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3140
144781
$167.23*
04/04/94
$426.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56969
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
144782
$426.00*
04/04/94
$6,737.20
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
26171
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
8438
144783
$6,737.20*
04/04/94
$37.50
ROMERA, ANAMARIA
INSPECTION EXPENSES
031694
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP:
144784
$37.50*
04/04/94
$230.00
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
9412917
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3389
04/04/94
$641.25
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
9412794
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3357
144785
$871.25*
04/04/94
$318.04
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
265622
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
144786
$318.04*
04/04/94
$31.00
SCHUMANN'S BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD F
2/94
GRILL
CST OF GD FOOD
2260
144787
$31.00*
04/04/94
$15.33
SCHWIMMER, HOWARD
REFUND WATER OVERPAY
032494
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
144788
$15.33*
04/04/94
$460.00
SHERIDAN SHEET METAL C
GUTTERS
55225
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
144789
$460.00*
04/04/94
$24.79
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
9168 -9
BUILDINGS
PAINT
3134
04/04/94
$169.02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
9138 -2
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3134
04/04/94
- $75.73
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
CREDIT
7240 -0
BUILDINGS
PAINT
144790
$118.08*
04/04/94
$65.50
SIGNAL SYSTEM
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
57467
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
144791
$65.50*
04/04/94
$50.00
SIITARI, MICHAEL
CONT ED /POLICE
032194
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
144792
$50.00*
04/04/94
$11.00
SMEGAL, GREGORY
LICENSES & PERMITS
032394
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIC & PERMITS
144793
$11.00*
04/04/94
$30.00
SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
030694
ED BUILDING &
CONTR.REPAIRS
!COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 17
;CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/04/94
$30.00
SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN'
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
03109401
ED BUILDING &-
CONTR REPAIRS
04/04/94
$75.00
SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN
CONTRACTED- REPAIRS
030994
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
04/04/94
$75.00
SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
031094
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
04/04/94
$100.00
SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
0310
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
3371
04/04/94
$50.00
'SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN
-CONTRACTED REPAIRS
0394
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
144794
$360.00*
04/04/94
$97.50
SOUND SYSTEMS INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
03159402
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
144795
$97.50*
04/04/94
$203.55
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU
BIDS BA 293
CPCO2987
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/04/94
$171.35
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU
BIDS BA- 293 /MATERIAL
CPCO2997
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
144796
$374.90 *.
04/04/94
$931.10'
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
37012
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$1,349.95
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
37011
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$69.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
28082
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/04/94
$927.35
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36887
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$2,374.35
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
36886
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
144797
$5,652.25*
04/04/94
$500.00
SOUTHWEST FIRE LEAGUE
CABLE FIRE SHOWS
032294
COMMUNICATIONS
Pro Svc- Aud /Vi
144798
$500.00*
04/04/94
$84.50
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2173373
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3217
04/04/94
$26.49
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2175108
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3299
144799
$110.99*
04/04/94
$970.22
ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT
ACCESSORIES
SM01198
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
2561 .
144800
$970.22*
04/04/94
$39.00
STAR TRIBUNE
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
032894
CENTENNIAL LAK
DUES & SUBSCRI
144801
$39.00*
04/04/94
$315.00
STATE LAB OF HYGIENE
DUES &'SUBSCRIPTIONS
31287
LABORATORY
DUES & SUBSCRI
3412
144802
$315.00*
04/04/94
$280.00
STEFANIE DUNFEE
GFOA CONFERENCE
031694
FINANCE
CONF & SCHOOLS
144803
$280.00*
04/04/94
$435.80
STREFF INC.
MEETING EXPENSE
035814
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPENS
3471
144804
$435.80*
04/04/94
$973.04
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
175420
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
2803
04/04/94
$20.17
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
200306
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
144805
$993.21*
04/04/94
$336.46
SUBURBAN PROPANE
LP FUEL.
031794
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
144806
$336.46*
04/04/94
$27.80
SYSTEM SUPPLY
BACKUP DISK
3245
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3472
04/04/94
$75.44
SYSTEM SUPPLY
LABELS /RIBBONS
3203
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3373
144807
$103.24*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 18
CHECK NO
---------
DATE
- - - - -- - --
CHECK AMOUNT
- ---
VENDOR
- - - - -- ---------- - -
DESCRIPTION
- - -- -- - - - - --
INVOICE
- -
PROGRAM
- - -- --------------------------
OBJECT
PO NUM.
-
04/04/94
$11.12
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31392
68645
SPECIAL ACTIVI
SPECIAL ACTIVI'GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
SUPPLI
04/04/94
$35.87
TARGET
144808
$46.99*
04/04/94
$959.00
TC MUSICIANS UNION
PROFESSIONAL SVC - 0
3248
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
3248
144809
$959.00*
'^
04/04/94
$1,816.36
TEE SHOT MARKETING
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
2043
GC CIP
CIP
CIP
2113
2113
04/04/94
$1,816.36
TEE SHOT MARKETING
BENCHES
2043
GC CIP
144810
-
$3,632.72*
04/04/94
$50.00
TEGNER, ELEANOR
PERFORMANCE EB 4/21
013194
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144811
$50.00*
04/04/94
$14.02
TESSMAN SEED INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18602
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
144812
$14.02*
04/04/94
$59.11
THE KANE SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
5406313
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
144813
$59.11*
04/04/94
$368.00
THOMAS MOORE INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
20230
20297
INSPECTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
04/04/94
$408.25
THOMAS MOORE INC
144814
$776.25*
04/04/94
$69.20
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
GOODS SOLD B
30193
3560
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
04/04/94
$108.50
$2,629.20
THORPE DISTR.
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
29780
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
MIX
04/04/94
$40.60
THORPE DISTR.
COST OF GOODS SOLD M
COST OF GOODS SOLD B
29780
30120
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS
CST OF GDS BEE
04/04/94
$305.85
THORPE DISTR.
144815
$3,153.35*
04/04/94
$4,637.63
TRACY /TRIPP FUELS
GASOLINE
130386
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
8437
144816
$4,637.63*
04/04/94
$25.00
TRETTEL, KATHY
VISUAL ARTS EB 4/14
021094
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
144817
$25.00*
04/04/94
$30.00
-TWIN CITIES WATERCOLOR
ADVERTISING ART CENT
032994
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
144818
$30.00*
04/04/94
$389.21
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
REPAIR PARTS
33465
PW.BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
144819
$389.21*
04/04/94
$232.63
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
TOOLS
7515
7589
BUILDING MAINT
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3131
3325
04/04/94
$227.54
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
CHAINS
144820,
$460.17*
04/04/94
$25.00
U S TENNIS ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
032394
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
144821
$25.00*
04/04/94
$379.19
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28932400
28828500
PW BUILDING
GC CIP
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3146
3035
04/04/94
$665.63
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144822
$1,044.82*
04/04/94
$64.23
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
031094
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
144823
$64.23*
04/04/94
$186.63
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$410.23
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$205.35
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$180.02
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$421.20
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$215.37
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040'494
CENTENNIAL LAK
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
.$50.88
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$657.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
040494
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
04/04/94
$596.82
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
ED BUILDING&
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$193.06
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040494
GOLF DOME
TELEPHONE
04/04/94
$113.03
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
- 040494
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
144824
33,229.59*
04/04/94
$12.80
US -WEST PAGING
TELEPHONE
008282
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
3409
144825
$12.80*
04/04/94
$900.00
VALLIERE, JOHN
CHANGE FUND
032194
GOLF PROG
CHANGE FUND
144826
$900.00*
04/04/94
$79.61
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
6769
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
04/04/94
$79.61
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
6773
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
04/04/94
$659.18
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
005116
50TH ST SELLIN
PAPER SUPPLIES
3164
04/04/94
$35.68
VAN PAPER CO.
TOWEL DISPENSER
005520
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/04/94
$880.44
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
005117
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
3164
04/04/94
$583.25
VAN PAPER CO.
BAGS
005118
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
3164
144827
$2,317.77*
04/04/94
$350.85
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12804
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
3490
144828
$350.85*
04/04/94
$468.60
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVI
REPAIR PARTS
7376
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1463
144829
$468.60*
04/04/94
$490.00
VIKING MEADOWS GOLF
FERTILIZER SPREADER
46272
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3492
144830
$490.00*
04/04/94
$145.75
VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
498928
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3405
144831
$145.75*
04/04/94
$323.02
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
286737 -4
PW BUILDING
REPAIR.PARTS
3058
04/04/94
$396.95
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
840206 -5
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
3144
04/04/94
$585.09
W W GRAINGER
TOOLS
289615 -9
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS 7
3050
04/04/94
$71.75
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
289040 -0
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2941
04/04/94
$223.59
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
285805 -0
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3149
04/04/94
$74.02
W W GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
604565 -8
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2941
144832
$1,674.42*
04/04/94
$186.38
WAGERS OFFICE SYSTEMS
VERSALINK
830340
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3078
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 31
1994 00:04:33
Page 20
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144833
$186.38*
04/04/94
$236.00
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
28743
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
3334
144834
$236.00*
04/04/94
$79.55
WATER SPECIALTY OF MIN
FILTER
5221
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3024
144835
$79.55*
04/04/94
$285.00
WENDY ANDERSON ENTERPR
CONSULTING FEES
031794
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
144836
$285.00*
04/04/94
$75.00
WESSINGER, LOUISE
PERFORMANCE EB 4/10/
021594
ED ADMINISTRAT_
PRO SVC,OTHER
144837
$75.00*
04/04/94
$3,887.25
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELDER CUTTER
10107
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIP REPLACEM
2811
144838
$3,887.25*
04/04/94
$288.00
WICKER, CYD
AC INSTRUCTOR
032994
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
144839
$288.00*
04/04/94
$182.87
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
HAND PICKERS
45489
RANGE
REPAIR PARTS
3005
144840
$182.87*
04/04/94
$200.00
WOLD, MIKE
REIMBURSE CHANGE FUN
032294
VERNON LIQUOR
CASH OVER AND
144841
$200.00*
04/04/94
$612.64
WRIGHT LINE
FILE CABINET
3122479
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
3093
144842
$612.64*
04/04/94
$898.00
ZAHNER CONSTRUCTION CO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
R -93 -3
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
144843
$898.00*
1
1
04/04/94
$120.73
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
54189115
ED ADMINISTRAT
SAFETY EQUIPME
144844
$120.73*
$633,324.82
COUNCIL
CHECK
SUMMARY Thu Mar 31 1994
00:06:02
Page 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
GENERAL FUND
$167,810.50
FUND
#
11
C.D.B.G.
$1,508.00
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATION
$1,515.18
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$2,391.20
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$3,587.20
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE
$55,298.64
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA
$9,154.07
FUND
#
29
GUN RANGE
$154.00
FUND
#
30
EDINB /CENT LAKES
$20,104.33
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$323,464.02
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER
$944.85
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR FUND
$47,392.83
$633,324.82