Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994-07-18_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 18, 1994 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of July 5, 1994 II. EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REBATE III. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 07/15/94 Total: $20,755.98 IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION.- Libraries Change Lives Week I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Council Meeting of June 20, 1994 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Avproval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition - Outlot A, Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition (Cont'd from 05/16/94) B.: Request to Amend Comprehensive Plan III. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF STORM SEWER EASEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk._ Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Storm Sewer Easement - Lot 15, Block 1, Southdale First Addition (6900 Cornelia Drive) IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pass. A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1994 -6 - An Ordinance Amending Code Sections 1200 and 1230 to Permit Sidewalk Cafes B. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1994 -7 - An Ordinance Amending Code Section 460 to Provide New Requirements for Projecting Signs Agenda Edina City Council July 18, 1994 Page 2 V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Braemar Tennis Courts - Harvey Dow, 6212 Loch Moor Drive VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. (One) 1.75 4 -Wheel Drive Articulated Loader (Continue to 08/15/94) ' B. (One) 3.5 4 -Wheel Drive Articulated Loader (Continue to 08/15/94) * C. Arrowhead Lake Aeration System * D. Manhole Puller/Extractor VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Staff Report of July 12, 1994 B. Herbicide Spraying - Advisory Board of Health C. Appointment to Human Relations Commission * D. Permit to Discharge Firearm at Braemar Park for Beaver Control * E. Approval of Polling Location - Precinct 19 * F. Set Hearing Date - Partial Release. of Conservation Restriction on Lot 4 and Lot 5 - Mark Dalquist Addition (08/15/94) * G. Set Hearing Date - Vacation of Utility Easement - Lot 5, Block 7, Woodbury Park Near Lake Harriet - 3617 West 55th Street (08/15/94) VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Food License - Edina Morningside Rotary XI. FINANCE A. Response to Auditor Management Letter B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 07/15/94 Total: $2,720,870.19 and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 07/13/94 Total: $399,341.00 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Aug 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Aug 15 Regular Council Meeting Thurs Aug 18 1995 Budget Hearing 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers Thurs Aug 25 1995 Budget Hearing 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: HRA I Agenda Item # HRA II I. FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES I Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ DATE: JULY 18, 1994 I Mgr. Recommends ❑x To HRA SUBJECT: EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REBATE Recommendation: ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Rebate excess tax increments to the Edina School District from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. Rebate amount for 1994 - $20,000.00. Info/Background: The Board of Education for the Edina Public Schools has adopted the attached resolution which requests that the HRA rebate excess tax increments resulting from the 1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the requested rebate is $20,000.00 and would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. The HRA has granted similar rebates to the School District since 1991. Rebated funds have been used for a variety of projects which benefit both the School District and the City. In 1991, the funds were used to recondition tennis courts at the Community Center. In 1992, the rebate was applied to the cost of rehabilitating the track at Kuhlman Field. In 1993, rebated funds were used for replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. . The School District's Resolution suggests that the rebated funds again be applied to the cost of replacing the playing surface at the field house. This project costs approximately $200,000.00. Therefore, the HRA rebate could be applied for a number of years towards this project. As an alternative, the rebate could be applied towards the cost of improving handicap accessibility to the seating area and to REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR EXCESS TAX REBATE July 18, 1994 Page two upgrade the press box facility at Kuhlman Field. Based upon our past policies, staff would recommend that the rebate be directed towards replacement of the playing surface in the field house. The requested rebate is for 1994, only. Future rebates will be considered on a year - by -year basis. FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, July 18, 1994 Volume 66, Report SUBJECT: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE FROM THE 1988 REFERENDUM Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Request the Edina City Council to rebate excess tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988 referendum for the fiscal year 1993 -94 only in an amount of $20,000. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Edina contains four tax increment financing districts, two of which (50th and France District and Grandview District) are inclusive within the school district. When these TIF districts were established the base or first year valuation of the districts was captured for taxing jurisdictions such as the school district or county, which means that tax revenue for the school district from the TIF districts remains fixed for a 20,to 25 year period. Because the TIF districts do increase in value the city is able to generate incremental tax revenue (difference between the fixed amount and current or incremental valuation). These incremental tax revenues are used to retire the development bonds and other costs of development. When the voters of the school district authorized by referendum an additional levy, the result of applying the additional levy on the incremental or current value is the generation of excess revenue to the development (TIF) district. This phenomenon directs revenue to the TIF district through no action on the part of the city instead of producing revenue for the school district for whose benefit the levy was created. The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act include a provision whereby a city with tax increment financing districts may pay excess tax increment revenue_ generated by a referendum levy to the school district (clause 3 of Subdivision 10 added to M.S. 469.177). Payment by a city to a school district of the excess tax increment revenue must be approved by a majority vote of the city governing. body. This request can be made annually hereafter and considered by the Edina City Council on a year -to -year basis. If this request is approved by the Edina City Council, the funds would be applied to either the cost of renovation work at the Kuhlman Field Stadium complex for improving handicapped accessibility to the seating area and to upgrade the press box facility, or to the cost of replacing the playing surface in the field house at Edina High School. These are facilities owned by the school district, but used by residents throughout the community. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:06:31 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $20,000.00 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TIF REBATE 063094 GRANDVIEW MISC 012597 $20,000.00* 07/18/94 $187.50 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 5101 GRANDVIEW EQUIPMENT 07/18/94 $568.48 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 5047. GRANDVIEW EQUIPMENT 012598 $755.98* $20,755.98 /1NA �t\ oe =tt o �r�aa i PROCLAMATION WHEREAS America's libraries empower people of all ages and backgrounds to learn and grow and achieve their dreams; WHEREAS in school, college, public and special libraries, librarians play a unique role in ensuring the public's right to know information they need to live successfully in the Information Age; WHEREAS libraries provide equal access to knowledge and information for all people; WHEREAS libraries are vital to a literate, productive and democratic nation; WHEREAS many millions of people depend on library services and resources to learn and grow, to prosper and achieve their dreams; WHEREAS the American Library Association is sponsoring a national touring exhibit entitled "LIBRARIES CHANGE LIVES'; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim "LIBRARIES CHANGE LIVES WEEK" beginning July 25, 1994, and encourage all people to use their library for the purpose of improving their lives and to join me in thanking our librarians for the valuable services that they provide to our community. Mayor Frederick S. Richards HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY EDINA COMMUNITY LIBRARY HENNEPIN 4701 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 July 15, 1994 Mayor Fred Richards Edina City Hall 4801 -West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear.Mayor Richards, On Monday July 25th, at 7:00, the Edina Library is hosting a reception to kick off the American Libraries Exhibit "Libraries Change Lives." The national exhibit is coming to the Edina Library from July 25 to August 12. The Valley View Middle School PTSO and the Friends of the Edina are local sponsors for the exhibit. The exhibit features photographs and comments from 36 well -known people in support of public libraries. Among these people are broadcaster Ed Bradley, and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. We have also asked members of the Edina community to participate in the exhibit by sending a brief letter about a personal experience with a library. Would you be able to join us at the kick off reception to issue a proclamation acknowledging the exhibit and saluting how Libraries Change Lives. I am enclosing a sample proclamation. It would be a real boost to the exhibit and for libraries if you could join us. If you are unable to attend, perhaps Peggy Kelly could fill in and make the proclamation since she is very familiar with the Hennepin County Library. I look forward to hearing from you. I will be out of town July 18 through July 21, returning to work on July 22. Could someone from your office leave a message at the Edina Library, letting me know if you or someone from, your office can join in making the proclamation at the reception on July 25, at 7:00. Thanks very much for your consideration. 'Cordially, 1 - Mafy son Swatosh Princip Librarian Edina Community Library OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 20; 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION ADOPTED - EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1994 GIRLS' GOLF TEAM Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Kelly and carried unanimously for adoption of a Resolution of Commendation for the Edina High School 1994 Girls' Golf Team. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 6. 1994, APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 6, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall -vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66 ORDERED (COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman stated that staff is reviewing all sidewalks in the City for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance and compliance to City Ordinance 1200 regarding sidewalk maintenance. Staff has completed the ADA requirements relating to curb ramps in the Country Club District. The intention is to repair curb and-gutters in the Country Club District next spring prior to sealcoating the streets. Therefore, it would seem prudent to do any needed sidewalk repair this season. The sidewalk panels proposed for replacement were marked earlier and obviously this is a subjective process. Staff believes that at least eighty percent of the marked panels should be replaced, with the remaining twenty percent being replaced for overall appearance of the District. The City conducts these replacement projects about once per decade so some panels were judged.not to be adequate to last the next ten years. This project would be similar to projects completed in 1967, 1973 and 1985 in the Country Club District. Upon examination the condition of the sidewalks were broken into three categories: - 1. Mark panels for replacement in violation of Ordinance 1200 (greater than 1/2 inch vertical separation); approximately 40 percent of the panels. 2. Mark panels for replacement which have less than 1/2 inch vertical separation but not even with adjoining panels (approximately 35 - 40 percent). 3. Mark panels for replacement which are cracked, spalled surface or uneven (approximately 20 percent). Most comments by residents have been about these panels. Staff believes that the project should be done for the following reasons: A. Liability - pedestrians tripping on the sidewalks. B. Maintain Edina as a premier community according to the City's Mission Statement. C. Repairs should be completed prior to curb /street renovation in 1995. The estimated cost per lot is $365.59 proposed to be assessed over a three year period. In 1985, the assessment was $321.00. Several callers suggested that each lot be assessed individually as opposed to spreading the cost over the District. Normally, lots are assessed individually for improvements in all other areas of the City. However, in the 1960's the Country Club Association,suggested that the City assess all projects over the entire District and that process has been followed for the Country Club District. Council Comment Member Paulus stated that although she lives in the Country Club District, she did not believe this issue to be a conflict of interest and she intended to participate in the discussion and vote on the proposed sidewalk project. No objection to Member Paulus' statement was heard. Member Rice asked if residents in the Country Club District could do their own sidewalk replacement and if they would be given credit for that. Engineer Hoffman said they would be given credit if they could document the work that was done. Public Comment Duncan Burns, 4523 Arden Avenue, commented that some of the panels dated 1985 appeared perfect yet were marked for replacement. He questioned the criteria used by staff in marking the panels and therefore was against the project in total. Bob McLane, 4527 Arden Avenue, submitted that this is a project without need except for those sidewalk panels that are hazardous to pedestrians. He proposed that such expenditure of energy and resources is environmentally damaging, and that more potential.for public life safety would be achieved if such expenditure were dedicated to laying sidewalk in areas not so served today. Greg Bruns, 4612 Bruce Avenue, stated that panels should be replaced if there is a safety issue or they are a real trip hazard and not because of a few cracks. He also objected to homeowners asking that certain additional panels be replaced because this would add to the amount of cost assessed against all properties in the District. Engineer Hoffman explained that although some marked panels may have less than 1/2 inch vertical separation there is the potential that they will become a tripping hazard within the next few years because of freezing and thawing during winter months. It was noted that letters in objection to the project were received from Barbara Vlaming, 4525 Bruce Avenue; Robert C. McLane, 4527 Arden Avenue; David and Sally Delahanty, 4624 Bruce Avenue; Joseph Klugman, 4601 Browndale. Letters from Michael G. Burnett, 4514 Wooddale Avenue, and R. Duncan Sinclair, 4200 Sunnyside Road, requested that only panels that are a hazard be replaced. Jeffrey N. Saunders, 4614 Bruce Avenue, objected to the proposed assessment method and suggested that costs be assessed based on lineal feet of sidewalk. Thomas J. Hogan, 4908 Bruce Avenue, wrote in support of the project. Donald Geesaman, 4606 Drexel Avenue, wrote that they replaced sunken sidewalks on their property in October, 1992, and asked for concession for that contribution. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66, and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include all of the Country Club District, Fairway and Brown Sections. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION FOR MARK DALOUIST ADDITION DENIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen reminded Council that on February 1, 1993, the Mark Dalquist addition received final plat approval for a four lot subdivision located west of Schafer Road and south of Interlachen Boulevard. At that time the Council imposed a conservation restriction on the plat covering an area 100 feet up from the ordinary high water mark of the two ponds located on the north and south of this property that affected the lots within the subdivision. The City has received a petition requesting a partial release of the conservation restriction, i.e. the upper 50 feet on both sides of the new street designated as open space area, to create more buildable area for each lot. The first 25 feet of the residual 50 foot restriction for each lot would remain as a natural condition area in which nothing could be altered. The second 25 feet for each lot would remain designated as open space area (yard with no buildings). Presentation by Proponent Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, Inc., presented a graphic depicting proposed building pads for homes on the four lots in the allowable building area and the difficulty he has experienced in attempting to build on the lots. The partial release of 50 feet of the conservation restriction would allow these lots to become buildable. He explained that the proposed homes (ramblers on the lots off the street and two story homes on the rear lots) are homes they have built over and over again in the last five years and represent the type of homes customers are looking for, but do not fit on these lots. Mr. Clark said that since the plat was approved, they have'met with 20 - 23 people, of these they have attempted to design homes for nine. When plans are laid out to scale on the buildable area the homes end up undesirable because the rooms are small. He said if these had been four pre- existing lots not subject to the subdivision process a conservation restriction of only 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark would have been required. He observed that in the general vicinity, many homes are sited within 25 to 50 feet of wetland areas. Mr. Clark concluded by stating that all lots in the subdivision exceed the median lot area and run in size from 1.25 to 1.5 acres and in looking at the ratio of building coverage to land there is a lot of room on these lots. Member Rice informed Council that he had inquired of Mr. Clark at a social event how building was going on the Mark Dalquist Subdivision and Mr. Clark had said not well because the buildable areas were too restrictive. Member Rice said he had encouraged Mr. Clark to bring this back to Council as he felt it was not the Council's intent to design a subdivision that was unbuildable. Member Rice said he had anticipated some minor adjustments and was astounded that the conservation restriction release request was for 50 feet which he would not support. Public Comment Ed Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, asked Mr. Clark what has changed in the last 16 months. Mr. Clark responded that it was his experience in meeting with approximately 22 potential customers. That area of Edina has a certain "air" about it and to try to sell an 1800 to 2000 square foot home is not what people are looking for there. He said he had made a mistake in,thinking he could work with the imposed conservation restriction. Continuing, Mr. Glickman stated he would speak to two issues regarding this petition: procedural and substantive. Procedural -l) The law for vacation of easements requires that a petition be brought by the majority of the property owners affected by this requested change. The petition was signed by R.E. Clark, Inc. At least five other homeowners who abut the property did not sign the petition.. 2) The law also requires 14 days posted and published notice and the notice was posted on June 10, 1994, four days short of the required time. The notice was published on June 1, 1994 (14 days before the hearing). However, Council met on June 6, to set the public hearing for June 20, 1994. Neighbors who attended the June 6, 1994 meeting gave numerous reasons to not hold the hearing on June 20, but the Council did set the hearing date for June 20, 1994. He alleged that staff had not followed proper procedure to hear this petition. Substantive - Mr. Glickman quoted from the minutes of the Council meeting of November 16, 1992, "Ron Clark interjected that he understood the Council would not approve the five lot subdivision with variances and would not consider the alternate two lot subdivision at this meeting. He asked if the Council would consider approving the five lot subdivision with no variances as he would be prepared to move forward on that basis." In February, 1993, Council approved the subdivision, subject to a conservation easement. Mr. Glickman said nothing has changed, Mr. Clark has made a bad business decision and it is not the City's place to maximize the developer's profit. The release of this easement does not fall within the purview of the statutes. According to City Attorney Gilligan, conservation easements are governed by the procedure for vacation of streets and alleys_. Mr. Glickman submitted that this is not a street or alley that is not being used and the property owner is burdened by it. The conservation easement does not run from Mr. Clark to the City of Edina, it runs to the people of the State of Minnesota. It is to preserve water quality and wildlife; it is not the City's to give away. He argued that it could not conceivably be in the public interest to do so and urged Council to deny the request. Regarding procedure, Mayor Richards said that if staff proceeded to publish notice of hearing in anticipation of a date the Council may set they did so at their own risk; he clarified that only the Council sets hearing dates. Council has communicated as best they can to give those who would be affected or impacted by a decision ample opportunity to be heard. Mayor Richards said this Council and town has done a good job in that they: 1) do not rush to judgement, 2) do not get hung up on technicalities, and 3) give everyone, regardless of their views, an opportunity to be heard. Patrick Manthei, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, said a decision must be made, but the issue is the still the same. On June 6, 1994, he had asked to have the public hearing delayed to allow more affected neighbors a chance to attend. He submitted that it was not fair to ask the neighbors to come back to re -hear the same issue. Mr. Manthei recalled that when the plat was being considered Mr. Clark was asked on repeated occasions if he could build in the allotted area and his answer was yes. By allowing this 50 foot conservation vacation a precedent would be set so that everyone who wanted to encroach on a conservation easement would have a right to do so. He concluded that the developer only wants to maximize his profit. Ted Pier, 5021 Ridge Road, said he had great respect for the Council's uniform application of law for all citizens of Edina. There have been many prior meetings of the Planning Commission and the Council on exactly the same subject which led up to approval of the subdivision. During the hearings by the Planning Commission there was extensive discussion on how to arrange the lots so there would be no need for variances. Mr. Clark agreed to no. variances and to follow the same set of laws the rest of the citizens of Edina follow. Mr. Pier said there is no legitimate reason for granting the petition and it should be denied. Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, said the proposal Mr. Clark is now presenting is nearly 100 percent bigger than what was originally agreed upon. She said-the neighbors should not have to bear the burden of the mistake made by Mr. Clark that this would be highly valuable and profitable property. Ms..Robinson asked the Council to deny the petition and suggested that Mr. Clark consider building fewer homes on the property. Council Action Member Paulus stated she would support the subdivision as previously approved and not grant the partial release of the conservation easement. She said that as a Council Member she represented both residents and proponents and was disturbed by some of the comments that had been made, i.e. procedure, legality, fairness, vulnerability. She said that it took restraint to stay with her original opinion rather than to vote in favor of Mr. Clark because of citizen response. While the established process sometimes takes long hours, she believed in this case it would be a win situation for Edina. Member Paulus said the Council is serious about wetland and natural area protection and has denied requests to encroach on such areas. Although this particular subdivision is difficult it may be telling us that not every parcel of land in Edina is a buildable situation. She reiterated that she would stand by the position taken when the subdivision was approved and would vote for denial of the petition. Member Rice commented that he did not intend for this matter to become this controversial; it was an attempt to talk about the issue. He said he would not support the proposal because he felt it was excessive. Member Rice made a motion to deny the request for partial release of the conservation restriction for the Mark Dalquist Addition. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Mayor Richards stated he would not support the total relinquishment of the 100 foot conservation restriction. As to the comment that you can't take this away from the public, he submitted that were it not for the action of the Council the conservation restriction would not have been imposed in the first place and what you take you can give. He pointed out that Mr. Clark's product on other developments has benefitted the City well and the City would end up on the short end if Mr. Clark was forced to build something that would not be similar to what exists in that neighborhood today. A more reasoned approach may be to look at this on a lot by lot basis where some deviation of the 100 foot conversation restriction may result in an end product all can live with. Member Kelly said she believed the property should be developed in some reasonable fashion, but a 50 foot variance is too much. She said she would support the motion but would not preclude giving Mr. Clark the opportunity to come back with a reasonable development for the property. Mayor Richards then called for vote on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR LEVIS RIDGE TOWWOMES (LOT 2. BLOCK 1 AND OUTLOT B. LEWIS RIDGE) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen presented the request for Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for the Lewis Ridge Townhomes located on Lot 2, Block 1 and Outlot B, Lewis Ridge Parkway. The subject property is zoned Planned Residence District (PRD -3). The approved zoning anticipated a three story, 54 unit condominium building which would be the mirror image of the existing Lewis Ridge which has not been developed. A proposal has been submitted by a new property owner which would replace the 54 unit condo building with a 15 unit townhouse development. As a result, the overall density would be reduced to approximately six units per acre with a net of approximately 5.2 units per acre. Access to the development would be by Lewis Ridge Drive, a private street. It is staff's understanding that necessary easements to utilize this access to service the 15 unit project are in place. The proposed development requests two setback variances. First, unit 12 along the north property line maintains a 30 foot setback where 35 feet is required. All other building setbacks comply with ordinance standards. Second, along the easterly property line, the drive aisle comes within six feet of the property line; ten feet is the required setback. Thus, a five foot building setback variance and a four foot parking setback variance are requested. The proposed exterior materials and landscaping plan meet or exceed ordinance minimums. The buildings will be primarily stucco with brick fronts and wood shake roofs. Two unit types will be constructed, one with 2,720 square feet and the other with 2,880 square feet of floor area. The proposed use would be consistent with PRD -3 zoning which makes no distinction between townhouses and apartment style condominiums except that townhouses are required to have two enclosed parking spaces. The switch to townhouses would reduce density and would lower the expected trip generation from the site. Staff would support granting the two requested variances. The combination of grade change and landscaping should eliminate any negative impact on adjacent properties. In both cases, the grade on adjacent properties is significantly above the grade on this site., At its meeting on June 1, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, subject to: 1) Final Plat Approval, 2) Developers Agreement, 3) Watershed District Grading Permit, and (4) Permanent easement for access to Lewis Ridge Parkway. Presentation by Developer Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, commented that on the north side of the parcel a finger of land comes out to Cahill Road which is the access point for the development which they close not to use because of the terrain. Also, La Chataignier condominiums are immediately to the south and have a permanent monument there. Mr. Clark said he had met numerous times with the Lewis Ridge Condominium owners and has negotiated and purchased from them an easement to use their current driveway off of Cahill Road into where the private drive for the townhomes would begin. Mr. Clark explained that 11 lower profile, rambler walkout units would be oriented to the park and would be bermed and heavily landscaped to provide maximum privacy for the Lewis Ridge Condominiums and the new townhomes. The four units to the north would be two story homes with a double tiered, 12 foot high retaining wall because of the steep grade and the five foot building setback variance is requested for this area. Public Comment Glen McDonald, 7200 Cahill Road, stated he was a member of the La Chataignier Board. He told Council that the Board is in full accord with the proposal and would hope that the development would proceed. Mr. McDonald said the Board's only concern is that they want assurance that access to the townhomes will be from Lewis Ridge Drive as proposed. Joanne Gruggen, La Chataignier, 7200 Cahill Road, asked for clarification of the variance request on the east for the driveway. Planner Larsen explained that this variance is requested because the driveway off Lewis Ridge Drive near the first two units only would come within six feet of the easterly property line' that abuts La Chataignier Condominiums. Ms. Gruggen said her concern was that the entire length of the driveway would be too close. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LEWIS RIDGE TOWNHOMES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Lewis Ridge Townhomes, Lot 2, Block 1, and Outlot B. Lewis Ridge, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 20, 1994, be and is hereby approved. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) final plat approval, 2) developers agreement, 3) watershed district grading permit and 4) permanent easement for access to Lewis Ridge Parkway RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LEWIS RIDGE TOWNHOMES BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled "L.EVIS RIDGE TOWNHOMES" platted by Ron Clark Construction and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 20, 1994, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. SEWER BACKUP CONCERN OF BRAD TESL.OW, 4128 WEST 62ND STREET, REFERRED TO STAFF Brad Teslow, 4128 West 62nd Street, spoke to the questions in his letter presented to Council regarding a recent sewer backup at his residence because of a lift station failure. He said that at least four times since 1958 the lift station has failed. Mayor Richards suggested that because his questions were of a technical nature they would best be answered by Dick Pelinka, Utility Supervisor. Mr. Teslow commented that he wanted assurance that the mechanism being installed at the lift station would prevent re- occurrence. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Teslow to work with staff regarding his concerns. CONCERNS REGARDING HERBICIDE SPRAYING ON CITY PARKS REFERRED TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Park and Recreation Director Keprios informed Council that he had received a copy of Kristine McKeon - Rohman's recent letter to Mayor Richards voicing her concerns about the use of herbicides in City parks. In the June 8, 1994, edition of the Edina Sun - Current a letter to the editor from Ms. McKeon - Rohman was published in which she stated, "Herbicide applications should be banned from public lands designated as play areas for children ". The editorial concluded with, "I urge any citizen concerned about herbicides applied to Edina parks to call the mayor's office at 927 - 8861 ". A total of 36 calls had been received at the time the staff report was prepared; subsequently eight additional calls have been received. It was noted that a letter in opposition to the use of herbicides in City parks was also received from Betty Kent, 4075 W. 51st Street #107, who included numerous articles to support her conviction. Director Keprios explained that in order to inform himself and the Council about herbicides from reliable sources he had phoned Wayne Daily, Licensing and Certification Consultant, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and asked for documentation on the use of herbicides. Mr. Daily referred him to Donald Page, Industry Task Force on 2,4 -D, Belhaven, NC who submitted documentation and numerous articles. In addition, Gregory Senst, Agricultural Inspector for the Conservation Environmental Management Division of Hennepin County was contacted. Director Keprios said these sources were very helpful in that he is not a toxicologist and could not tell anyone that the herbicides are safe nor could he say they are unsafe. City purchase of herbicides, which are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are through the county bid process. The chemical 2,4 -D is the most researched chemical in history and studies have been on -going for 40 years. The experts say that 2,4 -D is not a carcinogen. Various communities and organizations have dealt with the issue in different ways; the Edina School District has banned use of herbicides on all school property and the Minneapolis Park Board has done so also. There is a strong concern by the public that this is not a safe herbicide. The City of Plymouth hired the Minnesota Center for Survey Research to survey residents on this subject. Results were that 77 percent of those surveyed said to continue to use chemicals on a carefully controlled basis to control weeds in the parks. Director Keprios told Council that Park and Recreation's current practice is to not spray herbicide in the following areas: 1) around playground equipment, 2) around picnic tables and cooking grills, and 3) around or near ponds or lakes. In addition, staff would recommend the following: 1) no spraying on any Edina School District property, 2) treat only athletic field and hockey rinks at Cornelia School Park and Creek Valley School Park (general use areas for children will not be treated), 3) staff will coordinate spraying dates and times with Edina schools so as to minimize children's exposure to freshly treated areas, and 4) areas to be treated will be posted with signs prior to spraying as opposed to after treatment as in the past. Lastly, Director Keprios because this is a chemical health issue, staff would recommend that the Edina City Council refer the matter to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for further review and recommendation to the Council. Kris McKeon - Rohman, 7301 Oaklawn Avenue, asked Council to peruse the reputable studies she submitted, noting specifically the bibliographies of the research scientists who say that children are at a greater risk for cancer if they are exposed to pesticides. She explained that the term 'pesticides' means anything that kills, and includes herbicides and insecticides. When a child's health is at risk, decisions should err on the side of a child's health. She asked that herbicide spraying be eliminated from all areas where children play. Ms. McKeon - Rohman said she contacted City of Minneapolis staff and learned that they have not sprayed since 1991, but are creative with aeration and fertilization to get acceptable turf. Jim Sloss, School District Grounds Superintendent told her that the District will save $4,000 annually with nine sites by not spraying. She submitted that a significant amount would be saved by the City if spraying would be eliminated at the City's 40 sites. Ms. McKeon - Rohman said both the kids and their parents could care less if they play on weeds versus nice turf. She concluded by reiterating her request to not spray play areas, including soccer and ball fields. Member Paulus made a motion that the matter of herbicide spraying on City property be referred to the Community,Health Services Advisory Committee for review and recommendation to be brought back to Council on the July 18, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL FOR OAR WILT ONLY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for shade tree disease control for oak wilt only to sole bidder,. Runde Company, Inc., not to exceed $15,000.00 for 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL AND STUMP GRINDING Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for diseased tree removal and stump grinding to recommended low bidder, Outside Services, Inc., for tree removal of 0 -29 inch DBH at $9.75; 30" and up at $13.00; and stump grinding DBH $2.25. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR INDEPENDENCE DAY FIREWORKS DISPIAY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Independence Day fireworks display to recommended bidder, Remote Effect Systems, Inc., at $7,000.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PROPERTY INSURANCE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for City property insurance to recommended low bidder, Hartford, at $44,794.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. BID AWARDED FOR GENERAL LIABILITY. LIQUOR LIABILITY. BUSINESS AUTO AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Assistant to Manager Smith advised that the premium for workers' compensation insurance has increased 15 percent due primarily to changes in the experience modification factor and increases in payroll (2 %). Bill Homeyer, Harris - Homeyer Company, explained the rate structure and quotes obtained. There will be no change in the business automobile rates (only variable is number of units), no change in general liability rates (only variables are liquor receipts and golf course receipts). The work comp experience modification has changed from .74 to .86 and rates have increased four percent; the workers' compensation premium will increase accordingly. He then presented a graphic comparing quotations received from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), Home Insurance and St. Paul Fire and Marine. He explained that with the best loss levels, the premium with St. Paul would be $50,000 less than LMC and at the worst loss levels would be at $23,000 less than LMC. Premiums for the year will vary over $500,000 - $600,000 depending on the claims, with the actual premium determined after all the claims are closed for the year. Member Rice made a motion to approve award of bid for General Liability, Liquor Liability, Business Auto and Workers' Compensation Liability Insurance to St. Paul Companies at $706,288.00. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT OF JUNE 14, 1994 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman explained that under Section A(4) of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of June 14, 1994, the staff discussed the traffic patterns and speeds in the area. The driveway to the office complex at 5555 W. 78th Street is of concern due to the geometrics of the roadway and the 40 MPH traffic flow. Staff would recommend the Council pass a resolution requesting the Office of the Commissioner of Public Safety to reduce the speed limit on West 78th Street to 30 MPH westerly to Cecilia Circle. Member Kelly made a motion, seconded by Member Rice, to approve the following actions as recommended in Section_A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of June 7, 1994: 1) Police Department address the issue of pedestrian safety at the crosswalks on Hazelton Road between France Avenue South and York Avenue South through enforcement; 2) 'Erect "Private -Road - No Turnaround" signs at the intersection of Londonderry Road at Lincoln Drive; 3) Police Department address the issue of speed control on Malibu Drive through enforcement; 4) Council pass a resolution requesting the Office of the Commissioner of Transportation to reduce the speed limit on W. 78th Street to 30 MPH westerly to Cecilia Circle; and to acknowledge Section B except (2), (5), (6) and Section C of the report as presented. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Smith then moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION REGARDING SPEED STUDY W. 78TH STREET - FROM EAST BUSH LAKE TO CECILIA CIRCLE Whereas, West 70th Street between East Bush Lake Road and Cecilia Circle is a busy thoroughfare; Whereas, a significant number of accidents have occurred along this stretch of roadway; Whereas, the roadway geometrics tend to be curvilinear and has grades which result in excessive speeds of motorists. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Edina City Council requests that the Minnesota Department of Transportation undertake a speed study to determine if a lower speed limit can be established on said route. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion.carried. Section B (2) - Request to install multi -way "Stop" signs at the intersection of West 56th Street at St. Johns Avenue. Traffic Safety Coordinator Swanson reported that staff discussed the facts of traffic volume and speed at the above intersection. The 85th percentile speed was 25 MPH and volume was less than 150 vehicles daily. No accidents were reported over a three year search period. Staff recommended denial of the request due to lack of warrants. Lisa Finsness, 4536 Tower Street, presented a petition with over 60 signatures requesting STOP signs north and south on St. Johns Avenue between Woodland Road and Oak Street. The residents' recommendation was to place a STOP on Woodland and St. Johns and at Oak and St. Johns. Speaking in support of the request were Barb Hodne, 4532 Tower Street; Max Hintz 4517 Oak Drive; Maureen Robinson, 4521 Tower Street; and Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place. Member Smith made a motion that the Traffic Safety Committee study traffic concerns in the St. Johns Drive neighborhood and -come back to Council at the regular meeting July 18, 1994, with a recommendation to slow traffic down in the area. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Section B (5) - Request for multi -way "Stop" sign at the intersection of Brookside Avenue at West 44th Street to enhance pedestrian and vehicle safety. Traffic Safety Coordinator Swanson explained that staff discussed the safety and volumes of traffic at that location. Both roadways are collector roadways carrying over 2800 vehicles daily. No accidents have been reported over a three year search period. MTC users and other pedestrians cross Brookside with no enhanced signage. Staff recommended denial of the request and recommended installation of a painted crosswalk and crosswalk signage on Brookside Avenue at the intersection. Alex Russell, 4517 Drexel, asked what it takes to get a "Stop" sign installed. Jim Welna, 5139 W. 44th Street, and Sharon Gregoire, 5101 W. 44th Street, said the intersection has major problems with clearview because of the bus stop /turnaround when entering 44th Street. They asked for a STOP sign north and south at Brookside /44th and crosswalks on Brookside on both sides and across 44th Street on Brookside. The slope and alignment of temporary sidewalks on both sides need to be corrected. Engineer Hoffman said the Engineering Department would check the sidewalks. If there was a problem with the slope it would be considered a maintenance function to correct them. Member Rice made a motion upholding the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Committee for denial of the multi -way STOP sign at the intersection of Brookside Avenue at V. 44th Street and for installation of a painted crosswalk and crosswalk signage on Brookside Avenue at the intersection, and directed the Engineering Department to examine the alignment of the sidewalks. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. Section B (6) - Request for multi -way "Stop" signs at the intersection of West 62nd Street at Peacedale Avenue to reduce speed and improve safety. Staff recommended denial of the request and that the matter be transferred to the Police Department to be addressed through enforcement. Mayor Richards answered Bruce Teslow that enforcement by the Police Department would mean that citations would be issued to violators of set speed limits. Motion was made by Member Rice to uphold the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Committee to deny the request and that the matter be transferred to the Police Department to be addressed through enforcement. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. (Member Kelly was temporarily absent during the vote.) ORDINANCE UPHELD - CLF.ARVIEW VIOLATION /SPRUCE TREE - 6200 CHOWEN AVENUE Police Chief Bernhjelm recalled that at the Council meeting of June 6, 1994, Tim Davis, 6200 Chowen Avenue South, asked Council for relief from the requirements of the Clearview Ordinance (Code Section 1405). Staff had advised him that a citizen complaint had been received that a spruce tree in his front yard was blocking view of the intersection of 62nd and Chowen. He was asked to arrange for trimming of the tree but decided to appeal the request to the Council. Council had asked for input from public safety staff regarding the situation. Chief Bernhjelm reported he had visited the site and confirmed the violation. He presented slides showing illustrating the violation. No accidents have been reported within the last three years at this location and both streets are low volume residential streets. From a safety perspective, staff would oppose any dilution or variance in application of the Code. The Code is important to provide a standard for intersection visibility throughout the community. The clearview zone is relatively small and imposes minimal requirements on owners of corner lots. The visibility issue is.important because even though stop signs are present on Chowen, it is an unsafe practice to assume all drivers will stop. Attorney Gilligan informed Council that the City has an obligation to maintain streets in a safe condition. This maintenance would include obstructions off the street that would affect the travelled portion of the street. In his opinion, failure to enforce these standards may place the City in the position of being liable were an accident or injury to occur. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Davis for comment on the staff recommendation. In response, Mr. Davis said he had no further comments. Mayor Richards made a motion to uphold the clearview ordinance regarding the spruce tree at 6200 Chowen Avenue. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *RAGERS TEEN DANCE ORGANIZATION PROPOSAL WITHDRAWN AT SPONSOR'S REOUEST Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to accept the withdrawal of the proposal for the Ragers Teen Dance Organization as requested by President, Dawn Kerrison. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO THE COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD Mayor Richards advised that the following individuals have expressed interest in serving on the Community Education Services Board in the following capacities: Charlotte H. Burrell Member at Large Jean Rydell Park Board Representative Peggy Kelly Council Representative Member Smith made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Charlotte H. Burrell, as member at large, Jean Rydell as Park Board representative and Peggy Kelly as Council representative, to the Community Education Services Board for a one year term to July 1, 1995. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED: HEARING DATE OF JULY 5. 1994, SET FOR VALLEY LANE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VALLEY LANE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -67 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed Sidewalk Improvement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Tuesday, July 5, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING VALLEY LANE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 -67 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, July 5, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvement is' estimated as set forth below: ..Valley-Lane Sidewalk Estimated Cost SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -67 $20,488.14 The project is proposed to be funded by State Aid funds. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. (Member Kelly re- entered the meeting at this point on the agenda.) OUTDOOR DINING PROPOSAL PRESENTED - 50TH & FRANCE Assistant Manager Hughes reported that staff received a request from prospective tenants of 3910 West 50th Street concerning their use of the public sidewalk for, restaurant purposes. Materials were submitted by the prospective tenants for reviewal by the Council. Assistant Manager Hughes informed Council that Section 1230 of the City Code contains two provisions which prohibit private restaurant usage on public sidewalks. The first provision states that no person may park or occupy a street or sidewalk to sell farm produce or any other product or property. (The City now permits food carts in the 50th & France area by special permit). The Code also provides that no person shall consume intoxicating or non - intoxicating wine on public sidewalks. It is staff's understanding that the proposed tenant would intend to apply for wine and beer licenses for this establishment. According to the proposal, it appears that the proposed signage for the establishment does not comply with the sign ordinance. Projecting signs (i.e. signs which project over a sidewalk),.are permitted within the commercial district, but are limited to 10 square feet in area. Although it is difficult to measure the proposed sign, it appears to approximate 20 square feet in area. The proponents have asked that the City Council consider amending the ordinances in question to permit their proposed use of the sidewalk area. If the Council wishes, staff can prepare ordinance amendments for consideration at the Council meeting of July 5, 1994. Based upon staff's initial review, such ordinance amendments could provide _for an annual encroachment permit for such sidewalk restaurants. The proposal concerning the exterior signage is more problematic; however, staff could prepare sign ordinance amendments for Council consideration if desired. Presentation by Proponent Wayne Kostroski, 4815 Maple Road, said he was managing partner of Goodfellow's, Tejas, and Pronto Ristorante all in downtown Minneapolis, Muffaletta in Wayzata and Figlio's in Uptown. He presented his proposal for the restaurant at 3910 West 50th Street as follows: CONCEPT: A neighborhood restaurant designed to present a dining experience that is fun, inexpensive and suited to families as well as singles and couples, with the objective of having this restaurant feel established, and encourage frequent usage by the immediate and extended neighborhood. COST OFhXEffffeelA11fineha meamsiprP1adnbdlCw $pOaDOtobayoadualeaptiya¢Catedd $ mgn, DESIGN: - Area would include a visible cooking area, counter seating, an established feeling decor and an outdoor seating area. - One of the most important elements necessary to speak to a "pedestrian friendly" need in the area is the design and usage of the facade on the south side (50th). The plan includes a "patio" feel with a cut back area inward to folding glass doors, an extension of the front line to accommodate tables onto the sidewalk (4 feet 2 inches) and privately'controlled. Awnings would be above the sidewalk seating areas with a railing separation below. SIGNAGE: It is important to capture the energy of the restaurant space because of the high level of vehicular traffic by having a sign that is a projection from the building. It would serve as a means of identification but by design would provide another level of excitement to the streetscape. Public Comment Sally Robson, speaking on behalf of the Board of Directors and Past President of the 50th & France Association, commented that the Board voted unanimously in favor of the plan. The restaurant will only enhance the pedestrian character of the area. The updated facade will fit nicely with the existing buildings and be a welcome addition to the vacant space. The developers seem mindful of the maintenance needs and will be an attractive addition in any season. Marty Rud, 5709 France Avenue, representing the Lund organization property owners said they are very excited about the proposal. Other businesses had considered opening in the location but a restaurant was the most desirable use and would add excitement and uniqueness. He asked Council approval of the concept. Council Comment/ Action Assistant Manager Hughes answered Council concerns that he has less concern with the sidewalk use than with the signage. From an urban design standard, many things would compete with the signage, e.g. banners, lighting system, etc., and could set a new standard and change the aesthetics in the area. Perpendicular signs are limited according to City Code to 10 square feet; the request is for 20 square feet. Mr. Kostroski'explained that the outdoor seating area would be dismantled in the winter, i.e., fencing, tables /chairs would be removed and the sidewalk would be left flush for ease in snow removal. The location of the sign over the door is very important for visibility. Both lunch and dinner would be served at the restaurant. Mark Meyer, Shea Architects, clarified that while the restaurant would have awnings, they would not be backlit. The proposed sign would be lit one way during daytime and would change during the evening. The name of the restaurant would be outlined in neon with a softer background. Attorney Gilligan answered Member Paulus that Ordinance No. 1230 would need to be amended to allow the service of food or selling of products on the sidewalk if the proposal were approved. She voiced disapproval with a neon projected sign as proposed. Mayor Richards made a motion directing staff to draft an amendment to Code Section 1230 to provide for an annual encroachment permit for sidewalk restaurants and for consideration by the Council on July 5, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards made a motion directing staff to draft a modification of Code Section 1230 (Sign Ordinance) to permit square footage of 20 square feet or less, and for consideration by the Council on July 5, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Smith offered an amendment to the motion to direct staff to research options to reducing the total amount of wall signage to 15 percent if a projecting sign were to be allowed at 20 percent. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Mayor then called for vote on the motion as amended. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Rice Motion carried. *HEARING DATE OF JULY 18, 1994 SET FOR PETITION TO VACATE STORM SEWER EASEMENT - LOT 15. BLOCK 1. SOUTHDALE FIRST ADDITION Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF STORM SEWER EASEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined after receipt of the petition of the owner of the land affected thereby that the following described storm sewer easement should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: The northeasterly 3.5 feet of the northwesterly 32 feet of the southeasterly 65 feet of the southwesterly 10 feet (said 10 foot strip being parallel to and adjacent to the southwesterly lot line) of Lot 15, Block 1, Southdale First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412,851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF STORM SEWER EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th street on July 18, 1994, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easement for storm sewer purposes: The northeasterly 3.5 feet of the northwesterly 32 feet of the southeasterly 65 feet of the southwesterly 10 feet (said 10 foot strip being parallel to and adjacent to the southwesterly lot line) of Lot 15, Block 1, Southdale First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. REQUEST FROM CITY OF AFTON DENIED REGARDING OPEN MEETING LAW LITIGATION Mayor Richards reported receipt of a letter from the City of Afton requesting support in their request to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust ( LMCIT) for compliance with the Court of Appeals decision regarding the open meeting law affecting Afton city officials. In November 1991, action was brought regarding an emergency discussion in June regarding a well repair in the Afton City Park prior to a Fourth of July celebration. The original complaint alleged that the Mayor violated the open meeting law with two Council Members on three separate and unrelated occasions. The complaint asked that the statutory penalty be imposed ($100), and that the Mayor and two Council Members be removed from office. An elected official can be removed from office for three violations of the open meeting law. The courts have found only one unintentional violation and no. evidence of any other open meeting law violations. The three Afton City Council Members have incurred over $60,000 in legal expenses. The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled March 8, 1994, that the LMCIT has a duty tc defend and ordered them to do so. LMCIT attorneys have chosen to Appeal the charge to the Minnesota Supreme Court. All Minnesota communities believed that in joining the LMCIT they would receive legal defense coverage and the Court of Appeals concurs. The City of Afton has requested that the Edina City Council pass a resolution directing the LMCIT to comply with the Appeals Court decision. Member Smith made a motion to take no action on the request from the City of Afton. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Member Rice made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as.shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 17, 1994, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $891,333.68; Communication $9,482.84; Working Capital $6,344.37; Art Center $7,188.77; Swimming Pool $7,016.75; Golf Course $177,335.30; Ice Arena $70,361.62; Gun Range $2,019.77; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $18,392.91; Utility Fund $42,122.67; Storm Sewer $6,114.06; Recycling $39,779.77; Liquor Fund $63,710.69; Construction Fund $200,254.11; TOTAL $1,541,457.31; and for confirmation of payment and the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 8, 1994, and consisting of 8 pages: General Fund $106,245.36; Working Capital $104.00; Swimming Pool $160.00; Liquor Fund $220,674.24; TOTAL $327,183.60. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:40 P.M. City Clerk c; ft N ,OW VtW � II REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # II. B. FROM: Craig Larsen Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: July 18, 1994 0 To Council SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Action Motion Approval Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Resolution F] Ordinance Discussion Information /Background: The City Council considered and continued the proposed plat at its May 16, 1994, meeting. At that time the development included 16 townhouse units and a number of zero lot line single dwelling lots. The attached revised preliminary plat eliminates the townhouses and zero lot line lots. The revised plat illustrates 91 single dwelling unit lots. The overall plan, approved in 1978 also contained 91 single dwelling lots. In addition to the land use changes there are a number of other changes to the street system and lots within the plat. 1. Interlachen Boulevard continues to connect to Malibu Drive, but with a revised alignment. The revised plan contains two sharp curves one of which approaches 90 degrees. In order to provide a 90 degree turn a small land trade between the City and the proponent is requested. 2. The revised plan does not illustrate townhouses or zero lot line lots, but does contain some smaller single dwelling lots along the Interlachen frontage. Most of these lots are 85 to 95 feet wide, which compares to a 75 foot lot width for zero lot line lots on Malibu Drive. 3. The revised plan provides direct access to Van Valkenburg Park from Interlachen Boulevard. 4. The revised plan eliminates the thru lots (double street frontage) along Malibu Drive which were on the earlier plan. 5. The proposed phasing of the development has changed from the earlier proposal. Phase I would now include the construction of Interlachen Boulevard and the development of lots fronting on the new street. Phase II would involve the westerly portion of the site including the streets labeled Cougar Court and Cougar Trail. Recommendation: The revised plan provides a connection to the existing road system to the southeast, the northeast and the northwest. The total number of lots is the same as in the 1978 plan. The proposed road system is similar to the 1978 plan. The proposed preliminary plat does not require a rezoning or an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the revised overall development plan and preliminary plat approval for Phase I of the development subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement 3. Watershed District Grading Permit 4. Wetlands Alteration Permit, as required I A OMIOMEWT DATA 1110.1 TOww.Ouw la uwrs a 0 ACRES ZERO OT t LIVE 7 UNTO 2.5 ACRIS somEPM&T 73 tXlT8 42 1 Cal I.. ACIA f TOTAL tXWT5 tore AREA N UANTS $3.1 ACRES ce imm I. PHASING LIMITS -1994 GRADING LIMITS PIMINANARY PLAN cRo Roger Associates ARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1vjjgE 1� Anderson & As tes eering I EDINA. MINNESOTA S� Land Developmont 5 Wayzata vad 0 107 M"apoks. UN 55426 ey:.PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONST. Co. O"F "4 i BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT, PRD -4 FROM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, PCD -4 AND FROM SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, R -1 THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residence District, PRD -4 is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Parcel 1: The west 24.62 feet of Lot 1 and the East 20 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, STEVENS' 1ST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 2: Lot 6, Block 1, STEVENS' 1ST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, together with the East 1/2 of the vacated alley adjacent thereto lying between the extension Westerly of the North and South lines of said Lot according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 1, STEVENS' 1ST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, except the East 5 feet thereof, together with the East 1/2 of the vacated alley adjacent thereto lying between the extension Westerly of the North and South lines of said Lot 7, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 4: The East 96 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, STEVENS' FIRST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, excepting therefrom the Easterly 5 feet thereof conveyed to the Village of Edina for Highway purposes by Deed dated May 19, 1922, and recorded in Book No. 956 of Deeds on page 334. Also, excepting therefrom that part of Lot 1, Block 1, STEVENS' FIRST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, lying South of the North 7 feet of said Lot 1, West of East 5 feet of said Lot 1, Easterly of a curved line concave to the East line, radius 353.33 feet drawn from a point in South line of North 7 feet of said Lot 1, distance 15 feet West of East line of said Lot 1 to point in West line of East 5 feet of said Lot 1, distance 90.66 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1. Also excepting therefrom that part of Lot 1, Block 1, STEVENS' FIRST ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS, lying South of the North 7 feet of said Lot 1, Westerly of the following described line: A curved line which is concave to the East and has a radius of 353.33 feet and is drawn from a point in the South line of the North 7 feet of said Lot 1, distance 15 feet West of the East line of said Lot 1 to a point in the West line of the East 5 feet of said Lot 1, distant 90.66 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1 (Line "A "): AND Northeasterly of a curved line, concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 30.00 feet, and which is tangential with the South line of the North 7 feet of said Lot 1 and with said Line "A ". Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 5: Lot 1, Block 1, GLENVIEW ADDITION. The extent of the Planned Commercial District, PCD -4 is reduced by removing the property described above as Parcel 1 and Parcel 4 from the PCD -4 District." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for preliminary rezoning was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. ;\\\, 6APUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PARKWOOD DOLLS 24TH ADDITION CONTINUED TO JULY 18, 1994 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition generally located north of Parkwood Road, west of Green Farms Road and east of Malibu Drive. He told Council the subject property (Hansen property) comprises the 53 acres of undeveloped land in greater Parkwood.Knolls. In 1978, at the request of the City the Hansens provided an overall preliminary plat for all remaining vacant property. The preliminary plat was approved by the Council in September 1978. The 1978 plan illustrated 91 single dwelling lots remaining in the tract. Development since that time has been consistent with the approved preliminary plat. In 1991, the Minnesota Legislature passed the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) to protect and preserve untouched the state's wetland.areas. The revised preliminary plat under consideration is in response to the WCA. As shown in the grading plan, several small wetland areas are proposed to be filled. Under the provisions of the WCA the responsible local governmental unit must approve a wetland alteration plan for the development. The development proposal has three principal components. First, is revision to the overall development plan for the entire 53 acre tract. Second, is a rezoning along Interlachen Boulevard extended to allow for the proposed townhouses and the zero lot line single dwelling lots and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Third, is preliminary plat approval of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition for the 22 lots in Phase I. The proposed overall plan revision illustrates 73 single dwelling lots, 7 zero lot line single dwelling lots and 16 townhouse lots for a total of 96 units versus 91 units shown in the 1978 plan. The 73 single family lots range in size from 12,946 square feet to 24,816 square feet in lot area. The lots have a median width of 134 feet, median depth of 144 feet and median area of 18,486 square feet and are similar in size to the lots in the recent Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition on Green Farms Road. The entire tract is currently zoned Single Dwelling Unit District, R -1. The development.proposal would require a rezoning to Planned Residence District, PRD -2 to allow seven zero lot line lots and a 16 unit townhouse development along Interlachen Boulevard extended, proposed to be shifted to the south from Van Valkenburg Park to allow private frontage on both sides of the street. For PRD -2 zoning, the Zoning Ordinance requires that each individual unit have a minimum lot area of 7,200 square feet per unit. The proposed development (townhouses and zero lot line lots) have a lot area of 10,900 square feet per unit. The proponent has presented a 22 lot preliminary plat as Phase I of the development (Packwood Knolls 24th Addition) which would occur on the westerly portion of the tract generally parallel with Malibu Drive. The proposed lots average 127 feet in width, 157 feet in depth and 19,675 feet in lot area. The lots would be served by a new street, Cougar Trail, connecting to Malibu Drive. Although above minimum standards, Lots 2'through 7, Block 1, are significantly smaller than other lots in the plat and are through lots, having frontage on both Malibu Drive and Cougar Trail. The proponent is requesting the following actions: 1) Approval of revised overall development plan for the entire tract of vacant land, 2) Preliminary rezoning, including amendment of the Comprehensive Plan, for the zero lot line lots and townhouses on Interlachen Boulevard frontage, and 3) Preliminary plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. The Planning Commission considered the development proposal at two meetings: March 30 and April 27, 1994. On April 27, 1994, the Commission took three separate actions. First, the Commission voted 6 -4 in favor of recommending that Interlachen Boulevard be extended to Malibu Drive. Second, the Commission voted 8 -2 in favor of recommending denial of the proposed rezoning to allow townhouses and zero lot line single dwelling lots. Third, the Commission voted 10 -0 with one abstention recommending denial of the proposed rezoning and subdivision request. Presentation for Proponent Carl Hansen, Vice - President of Parkwood Knolls Construction, recalled that Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition was given preliminary approval in 1978, which included what is now Parkwood Knolls 23rd Addition and the proposed Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. The overall development plan, based on the 1978 version, has been revised to accommodate 1994 concerns as follows: 1) Mitigation of wetlands. New regulations direct that wetlands be preserved if possible. After a wetland delineation study was done, certain revisions were made to meet the new regulations. 2) Buffer zone between the park and the residential area. Long time residents have indicated certain unmet housing needs such as zero lot line lots and the demand has been overwhelming. A later concern was the City's request for park access on the northeast corner of the subject parcel which has been provided by an alternate plan. He noted that the overall plan was developed after several meetings with various City departments and meets the City's comprehensive guidelines. Mr. Hansen stated that at the Planning Commission meetings a number of residents objected to the extension of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive because of increase in vehicular traffic and they wanted to cul -de -sac Interlachen Boulevard. This would increase traffic in other areas and would impact more people. Mr. Hansen emphasized that the extension has been a given in the design of the proposed development. As to complaints about grading and dirt storage on the property, he- explained that any such activities -have been in connection with development on the west side of Malibu Drive or as requested by the City for silt ponds and seeding. Regarding concerns about devaluation of existing homes, he said that was not a reasonable argument because the proposed zero lot line homes and the townhomes would be priced from $300,000 to $500,000 and the single family homes are projected at $500,000 and up. Concerning wetland mitigation studies, Mr. Hansen said they are up to date and waiting for preliminary approval of the development so that the process can continue. He urged the Council to grant preliminary approval or make recommendations for revisions deemed necessary to gain approval. Roger Anderson, Roger A. Anderson & Associates, told Council he was the engineer for the proposed development and would be involved with the sewer, water and grading aspects. For this project he said they had a good idea of what the expectations were with the approval of Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition in 1978. Those were brought forward to 1994 with some modifications, primarily because of the recent wetland legislation for preserving wetland areas. In the southern portion of the parcel some modifications were substantial in order to re- locate the building pads and streets away from the wetlands. From the developer's standpoint, the extension of Interlachen Boulevard was a given as proposed in 1978, although now an issue raised by the neighbors. Mr. Anderson said that although there is no specific park development plan at this time the developer is willing to provide park access. Public Comment Dale Renner, 6321 Interlachen Boulevard, told Council he was co -chair of the Interlachen / Parkwood Knolls Coalition whose objective was to voice their primary concerns and issues regarding the proposed subdivision. He said other members of the coalition would speak to their main issues of concern. Issue #1 - Extension of Interlachen Boulevard west to Malibu Drive and making it a collector street. Patrick Mantyh, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, described the street as being 23 -24 feet wide with sharp grades. He said the road as it stands would not be able to take the projected additional traffic if extended to Malibu Drive. The street is used by 23 children in the area who use and play in the street. He commented that_the neighborhood is willing to accommodate a reasonable share of traffic from the new subdivision but does not want Interlachen Boulevard to become a collector street that would see a dramatic increase in traffic because it would connect to Highway 169. Mr. Mantyh said their main concerns are safety for the children, resident security, preserving the character and symmetry of the neighborhood, maintaining property values and neighborhood cohesiveness. He noted that ultimately the street would have to be widened and urged the Council to allow Interlachen Boulevard to remain in its present state. Edward Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, said he objected to the proposal because the road is too narrow, too weak, grades are too steep and there is not enough right of way. He referenced various transportation agency guidelines and related those standards to the existing roadway. If Interlachen Boulevard is put through in any fashion,. as a low density or high density road, it will have to be widened and the grades stripped down. He estimated that it would cost the City a minimum of $320,000 to put the roadway through and cautioned the Council about turning Interlachen Boulevard into a dangerous collector road. Issue #2 - No plan for the neighborhood park has been fully developed. James Fee, 5204 Ridge Road, said he was speaking as an 11 year resident and a Park Board member but that his comments were his own because this issue has not been before the Park Board. He noted an amazing growth of children who are playing on Interlachen Boulevard and said the tendency seems to be that younger families are moving into the area. Mr. Fee said, although development of a neighborhood park would be a nice addition, the location of Interlachen Boulevard would be a major concern as it relates to child safety. He opined that because of the adult softball fields in the park extending Interlachen Boulevard would create a reverse flow of traffic into the eastern part of Edina. Issue #3 - The proposed housing density threatens the fragile ecosystem and wetlands. Tom Seitz, 6320 Interlachen Boulevard, said the coalition recognizes that certain permits must be approved for the development and they would like to offer insight into the planning for the wetland areas. Per the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, the definition of wetland has changed dramatically since 1978 and a determination must be made as to whether the current development plan complies. The full extent of the environmental impact of the proposed development cannot be determined until a comprehensive plan has been prepared. Mr. Seitz said that to their knowledge the following plans have not been submitted to the appropriate agencies for review and approval: (a) grading and drainage plan, (b) wetlands definition map, and (c) storm water holding plan. He added that it appears some wetlands will be eliminated and under the WCA there must be mitigation; it is unclear if that process has been completed. The impact of this activity and the development in general on the wildlife in the area will have a negative impact on the neighborhood. In lieu of the presentation of Issue #4 concerning density and rezoning, Mr. Renner presented the coalition's recommendations on each of the four issues summarized as follows. Issue #1 - 1) Detailed plans of complete subdivision be prepared to ensure total long -term impact on neighborhood is specified and understood, 2) Table plat until review of Comprehensive Land Use Plan is conducted to evaluate viability of turning Interlachen Boulevard into collector street, 3) Redesign roadways in development to access Malibu Drive, County Road 169 and routes other than Interlachen Boulevard. Issue #2 - 1) Incorporate involvement of neighborhood pertaining to park accessibility, suitability and demographic needs, 2) Avoid putting through traffic roads_ by park, 3) Maintain access to /from Van Valkenburg Park in current state, 4) Develop neighborhood park in timeframe consistent with rest of subdivision development. Issue #3 - 1) To ensure preservation of wetlands and compliance with WCA, all required plans for entire subdivision should be reviewed and approved by appropriate agencies before any development begins. Issue #4 - 1) No change in zoning granted on the basis that a clear and compelling reason for change has not been established, 2) New plan be prepared that is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, with the exception of Interlachen Boulevard being extended, requiring developments to be in keeping with topography and neighborhood characteristics. Lisa Fish, 5408 Larado Lane, said her main concern was the road system for the development. Although sympathetic with the residents on Interlachen Boulevard and their concern about its extension, she said to be fair they should bear some of the traffic burden from the development as her neighborhood already has a lot of through traffic from Green Farms Road. Bill Jardine, 5400 Malibu Drive, reminded Council that the Planning Commission had recommended that the proposed development be denied. He pointed out that by opening up Malibu Drive to Highway 169 it has increased traffic on Malibu Drive. He said there is an increase in burglaries whenever a neighborhood is opened up to a major highway. He agreed that there should be an overall detailed plan that would show what the neighborhood would look like in the future. Robert Shober, 6805 Telemark Trail, said his neighbors are truly concerned with the proposed development. He said their lifestyle has been greatly altered since the start of construction of the six houses up on Malibu Drive. They are concerned about the congestion that would greatly increase with the construction of these additional homes and also the impact on the environment. Wayne Packard, 4909 Prescott Circle, said the real problem with extending Interlachen Boulevard is the existing grade, which is especially difficult to drive in winter. He commented that this parcel cannot be developed at the highest use for maximum revenue to the developer without greatly impacting the residents who are already living in the neighborhood. Janie Hayes, 5224 Larado Lane, said she shared the concerns about extending Interlachen Boulevard because of the safety factor for children and adults who walk and bike the roadway. She said what happens with this last undeveloped parcel will determine what will happen to existing homes in the area as many younger families are looking for new properties in less congested areas. She urged that Interlachen Boulevard not be extended through. Jeff Anderson, 6205 Parkwood Road, said he had no objection to development of this property and was also sensitive to the residents who live on Interlachen Boulevard as to how the traffic pattern would change if connected to Malibu Drive. He pointed out that to the east there would only be two routes out of old Parkwood and this new development if Interlachen is not extended. He said there is no question that if Interlachen is not extended all that traffic will have to flow south on Parkwood Road or South Knoll Drive. He asked consideration for the existing neighborhood to the south. Bill Hatch, 6405 Parkwood Road, asked the Council to consider serious the recommendation by the Planning Commission for denial which was based on the inappropriateness of: 1) the multi - family houses, 2) the zero lot line houses, and 3) the plan for Interlachen Boulevard. He added that he had heard nothing presented by the developer that would override the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. Ken Durr, 4830 West Cate Road, Minnetonka,'said he was a developer and builder and owns a dozen properties in Edina, five of which are vacant residential lots in Interlachen Heights which abuts the proposed development. He told Council that prior to purchasing these lots he had several concerns. First, the zoning and improved use of the subject parcel. In checking with the City he was told it was zoned single family and was shown the 1978 overall development plan that showed single family, no zero lot lines, no townhouses. Secondly, the future of Interlachen Boulevard - extended or cul- de- saced. If it were extended what would be the traffic volume and speed. He was told if extended it would be aligned with a sharp turn to the south which would control vehicular speed and 'discourage through traffic. Subsequently, he has shared this information with prospective homeowners. Mr. Durr offered that the proposed development has placed a "hardship on him as well as the new homeowners for whom he has built. He explained that a month ago a prospective client decided not to build in the area after the rezoning sign was posted for the subdivision. He urged the Council to consider cul- de- sacing Interlachen Boulevard or if extended, to reconfigure the roadway so that it would discourage outside through traffic but yet serve the neighborhood. Daniel Jurgens, 4906 Bruce Avenue, said he was the prospective homeowner referred to by Mr. Durr and had decided not to build in the area as soon as they found out that Interlachen Boulevard may be extended. He said if extended the traffic would be just like on West 50th Street. Dawn Kerrison, 6517 Willow Wood Road, commented that she lives just across from the subject property and told Council there are a lot of children in her area who play in the street because there are no sidewalks. She saw as the only solution having the top priority be that the existing neighborhood not be diminished by the proposed development. `If someone has to make a concession, it should be the new home buyers who will know what they are getting when they buy. Jeri Lou Lukaska, 6645 Parkwood Road, said she is a realtor and works with upper income bracket people who are relocating. Her experience has been that people keep coming back.to Edina because it has maintained its planned neighborhoods. She urged the Council to look to the future and preserve the large lots that are a part of the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. Floyd Kuehnis, 4916 Interlachen Court, said he endorsed what has been said by the Interlachen / Parkwood Knolls Coalition. He said he had attended the Planning Commission meeting when this matter was heard and found that the various motions made were very confusing. He suggested that the votes not be interpreted as presented because the premises were unclear. Bob Hollaway, 6644 Parkwood Road, said he also had concerns about the safety of the children but felt.the impact of the added traffic from this development should be shared by all rather than a few. The Council should look at the homes, both on Interlachen and Parkwood, that will be impacted by the increased traffic. He said his understanding was since Interlachen Boulevard was built in the 1950's that it would eventually go through to Highway 169. James Ronning, 6416 Interlachen Boulevard, commented that we have not heard from a group of people because they do not exist - those who will eventually live in the proposed subdivision. He said he felt they would be opposed to the extension of Interlachen Boulevard through their neighborhood. Jean Mooty _5320 Kelsey Terrace, said that if Interlachen Boulevard -is not extended, much of the traffic from the new development will pass her home. She asked the Council to not put all the traffic burden on the existing homes to the south. Catherine Peterson, 6513 Stauder Circle, said she shared the concerns of the homes to the south and told Council that traffic has increased tremendously since Malibu Drive was opened. She urged the Council to listen carefully and not move too fast in making a decision. Mattie Greif, 6629 Parkwood Road, suggested that if Interlachen Boulevard is extended it should follow a very circuitous route so that it does not become a straight shot through. Mary Seitz, 6320 Interlachen Boulevard, said everyone in the greater neighborhood has the same concerns and many have said all should share the brunt of the traffic. She suggested that the developer also share in the burden and questioned if the area could handle the traffic from a development of that size. She suggested that the developer consider something less than 96 units. Bob Kaatz, 6505 Parkwood Road, told Council he had lived at his address for 25 years. He said the comments about property values and the developer's stake in this project were interesting. He pointed out that when he bought his home he paid one sixth of what it is worth now and that any one of the lots in the new area would experience the same. He said the Council has a responsibility to work with the developer to urge for consistency in maintaining that quality of homes in Edina. Response for Proponent Roger Anderson, Project Engineer, said the developer has indicated an effort to develop the subject parcel in a manner consistent with the existing general area and feels the proposal does that. He mentioned that the Planning Commission did not make any suggestions that could be incorporated into.the plat to improve it except eliminating the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. He asked the Council for suggestions and direction for the proposed plat. Council Comment /Action Member Kelly observed that this is 53 acres of the most valuable vacant land in Edina and a decision should not be made quickly. Although the proponent has a right to develop the land, it should be done well and in a manner that would maintain the character of Edina. She offered the following: 1) need for an engineering study, at the expense of the developer, to determine if Interlachen Boulevard extended could support the increase in traffic, 2) environmental issues need to be addressed, 3) 1978 overall plan showed Interlachen Boulevard extended but design is important so that it does not become a through street to Highway 169, 4) not convinced that town houses should be a part of development or that the zero lot line lots should be in that location, 5) developer should meet with the neighborhood residents to address concerns. Member Kelly concluded that she was not willing to go forward on the proposal until these things are done. Member Rice acknowledged that, although many concerns have been expressed, the proponent has been one of the premier developers in Edina and has made a lot of Edina what it is today. As to asking for direction from the Council concerning the development, it is the responsibility of the developer to come up with a better overall plan thar. has been presented. Concerning extension of Interlachen Boulevard, Member Rice said the neighbors have suggested that it have a circuitous design and that all should share the burden of the increased traffic from this development. In conclusion, Member Rice said in his judgement the plan that has been presented is not workable. Member Paulus that this is the largest parcel of land proposed for development since her years on the Planning Commission and the Council. The concerns of this neighborhood as also the concerns of the established neighborhoods in Edina - impact of increased traffic. Regardless of how this parcel is developed, there will always be traffic in neighborhoods because of the ring of highways around Edina. Drivers will always attempt to cut through neighborhoods; the issue is how best to accommodate this traffic for the well being of everyone. Member Paulus said Interlachen Boulevard needs to be looked at carefully and that extending it to Highway 169 is not the answer. The second issue is going forward with the development without knowing the plans for the future park playground. She agreed that there -needs to be a better relationship between the developer and the neighborhoods. Member Paulus said she concurred that the plan must go back to the developer. Further, that the developer present an overall long range plan for the entire parcel taking into account all the comments that have been made at this hearing. Mayor Richards commented that good planning has been done in this area of the City over the years and he felt the area should continue to be developed as single family homes. In summary, he said the Council has indicated they are not ready to act on the proposal as presented and asked the City Planner what time constraints if any need to be met. Planner Larsen answered that because of the size of the development and in order to comply with the Wetland Conservation Act the developer has agreed in writing to waive the requirement for action by the Council within 120 days of application. Mayor Richards noted that there would only be four Council Members present at the meetings of June 20 and July 5. Member Kelly made a motion to continue the public hearing for preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition to July 18, 1994, to allow the developer and staff to address the concerns and comments that have been heard. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDED TO CHANGE ROAD DESIGNATION FOR PARKLAWN AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen advised that Parklawn Avenue is shown as a "Local Street" on the City Land Use Map. The proposed amendment would change its designation to that of "Collector Street ". This change in designation would be consistent with traffic projections contained in the Centennial Lakes master plan and in the Centennial Lakes Indirect Source Permit. The change would also allow the street to be put on the state aid system. The state aid funding is necessary to construct the street and bridge. Staff would recommend approval of the amendment. Member Rice moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY DESIGNATING PARKLAWN AVENUE AS COLLECTOR STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended to change the designation of Parklawn Avenue from Local Street to Collector Street on the 1980 City Land Use Map. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR CHEVROLET 5 -10 PICKUP TRUCK Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for one Chevrolet S -10 Pickup To: Members of the Edina City Council From: James & Carol Ladner July 11,1994 Subject: Proposed Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Subdivision and Re- Zoning presented by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company. We have attended the meetings of the Planning Commission and the City Council meeting concerning the 24th Addition Subdivision. The proposal presented has created a great deal of interest among the residents in the area, and rightly so. We have presented our thoughts to the planning commission, both verbally and in written form. (copy enclosed.) The development of the area to date has created a very nice neighborhood of single family homes which is enhancing to the entire City of Edina. The addition of lot line homes and town houses in this area would be a negative to this single family home concept. We are very much opposed to opening Interlachen to the west joining Malibu Drive. The area will be degraded if it is opened to through traffic as there would be a tremendous influx of non - residential traffic seeking ways to avoid a freeway system. As it presently laid out, we already have non - neighborhood traffic passing through. It is imperative that a study be made of the traffic flowing through the Interlachen Boulevard -Blake Road area. It is a bottleneck at this location and could not stand an increase of traffic if the boulevard were to become a through street. Several weeks ago at the stop sign on Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard, I observed 44 cars lined headed North at 5:55 PM. It has been pointed out the West Interlachen is a very narrow street and that presently the grade at Ridge Road is a hazard. You will note in the letter to the Planning Commission, the late Carl Hansen had told us that the plan submitted in the 1978 was his concept at that time, and that the routing showing West Interlachen Boulevard as a through street would be revised. We are aware that with the construction of additional housing in the area, that access needs to be provided. We suggest that the Parkwood Knolls Construction Company engineers can come up with a plan that will divide the access for future residents equally between North, South, East and West. This would split the traffic flow to North 169 access via Malibu Drive, South 169 access via , South and East to Gleason via Parkwood and East on Interlachen to Blake Road and East Interlachen Boulevard to Vernon Ave. We see no rational to provide for those not residing in the area to use local roads through residential areas as an easy access to the freeways. We also have observed that the park land that has been set aside appears to be for the benefit of Edina residents and non -Edina residents that do not reside in the area. Most of the park area is set up in ball fields and enclosed by a fence that restricts area residents access. We also submit that in complying with the Wetlands Provisions, that approximately five acres, (10% of the total addition,) is restricted. This should allow for 10% fewer single family homes reducing the proposal to 82 housing sites. The engineers should make provision for this adjustment. Mr. Harvey Hansen has publicly stated that he did not care whether or not Interlachen Boulevard passed through to Malibu Drive, nor was he adamant regarding the town houses. Therefore, we are at a loss as to who is the driving force that desires to include these provisions. We urge you to turn down the provision to convert Interlachen Boulevard as a through street to Malibu Drive and to turn down the rezoning request to allow zero lot line and townhouses. WE support a plan that allows for the development of 82 single family housing units with traffic flow serving those units divided equally North, South, East and West. Sincerely, Carol K. Ladner James W. Ladner CC; PArkwood Knolls Construction Company 4 JAMES W. LADNER 4931 GREEN FARMS ROAD EDINA, MN. 55436 April 23, 1994 MEMBERS OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION I have been a resident of Edina since 197 and have lived in three homes constructed by the senior Carl Hansen. I was in attendance at the March 30th meeting of the Edina Planning Commission, and would like to comment on several of the points discussed at that meeting. It is obvious that the neighborhood is against the idea of extending Interlachen Boulevard thru to Malibu Drive. Prior to building my present home, I had a number of meetings with the deceased Carl M. Hansen. He advised me that the idea of extending Interlachen to the west was only a conceptual idea of his, and that prior to re- platting the remaining land that he owned, it was his plan to alter the plat to eliminate a thru route to the west. At the recent planning meeting, we were led to believe that the idea of a thru street was sponsored in the long range development plan by the City. Interlachen Boulevard west of Blake Road is a neighborhood street, not in anyway upgraded as is Interlachen Boulevard between Vernon Avenue and the junction with Blake Road, ( which is a county road). The street is in no way capable of handling volumes of thru traffic, which would result in the extension to Malibu Drive. It has been my experience for the past four years, that the much of the present traffic on West Interlachen Boulevard currently travels in speeds in excess of 30 mph. A thru street would be an additional hazard to the children and the many neighborhood walkers. On a recent l riciay evening at 5:10 PNI there were 15 cars headed North, backed up on Blake Road at the lnterlachen Boulevard stop sign. My observation was that few, if any consisted of local traffic. Rather they were people passing thru from outside the neighborhood with destinations outside the area. We do not approve the plan to connect Interlachen with Malibu Drive. At the meeting, it was described that the 1978 plat allowed for 91 single family lots. The proposed plat requests altering to allow for 96 units, which includes town house units and zero lot line units. This is allocation is to be.on about 10% (approximately S acres,) less area because of the wetland regulations. Logic tells me that the development should be restricted to 10% fewer single family building .units rather than increasing the density. This would be more consistent with the original plans as envisioned by the senior Mr. Hansen. All developers are faced with meeting the wetland regulations and many are doing so by reducing the density. We do not want a higher density, nor town houses. The senior Mr. Hansen executed a great addition to the City, and his vision was to create a quality neighborhood without crowding housing units onto every available parcel of land. I would propose that a plan should be developed to funnel the additional automobile traffic serving the neighborhood half to the south and east, and half to the north and west, with no allocation for thru traffic. The plan as presented benefits only the developer, at the expense of the present and future residents of the area. I urge the Edina Planning Commission to deny the plan as proposed, and to consider the wishes of the neighborhood tax paying Citizens, present and future. Thank you. Sincerely, es W. Ladner CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 1994 TO: Craig Larsen, City Planner FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer - SUBJECT: Parkwood Knolls Development The Engineering staff has reviewed the new plan and your staff report. We would concur with your report. We would also comment that the issue of Interlachen Boulevard is being listed as a collector street. Certainly this is not mandatory. The pant of the designation was more to indicate that the street would tend to operate more like a collector than a strictly local residential street. If design and traffic control issues are reviewed on Interlachen Boulevard, a few notes are appropriate. First, a couple of locations on Interlachen could be selected for STOP signs to not give the street the appearance of a thru street. Second, the new development shows a 90 degree turn as the road approaches the park area which will cause slower speeds in that immediate area. Also, different geometrics and traffic control at Malibu Drive. Lincoln Drive and W. 7th Street intersection could be developed to encourage traffic towards Maloney Avenue which is the current street connecting Lincoln Drive and Blake Road. The Engineering staff supports as many roadway connections as possible to spread the traffic load without directing it onto one street. S! REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # II. c. FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: July 18, 1994 Q To Council SUBJECT: Request for Action ❑ Motion Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑x Discussion Info /Background: A group of neighbors in the vicinity of the proposed Parkwood Knolls area ( Parkwood Knolls Coalition) have submitted the attached request or council consideration. The request would change existing Comprehensive Plan language addressing the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. Consideration of this request would be appropriate once the council has decided on the street system for the proposed development. Comprehensive Plan Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. 1 June 29, 1994 City Council Members Attn: Craig Larsen City Hall of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed Change to Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dear Council Members, The Interlachen /Parkwood Knolls Coalition would like to request a hearing on the following section of the C.L.U.P.: Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Land Use Element, P.22, Item IV., Area Consideration, Northwest Edina, Policies Require the extension of Interlachen Blvd. westerly to Malibu Drive and ultimately CSAH 18 in conjunction with further subdivisions. A request is being made for a change to read as follows: Require a means of ingress and egress for new residents of Parkwood Knolls 24th Subdivision, connecting the newly constructed roads of said subdivision, in a circuitous manner, westerly to Malibu Drive and ultimately CSAH 169 and easterly to the existing Interlachen Blvd. The following rationale is offered for this proposed change. • Provides an easterly exit for the subdivision which accommodates a reasonable share of new traffic, yet discourages use as a high traffic collector street. • Provides a safer, more secure neighborhood. - Minimizes unwanted traffic from outside of neighborhood. - Uses stop signs and turns at intersections to control traffic speed. - Uses new road names that are not easily recognized as a direct east -west thoroughfare through Edina. • Reduces potential traffic congestion at Interlachen/ Blake intersection thereby eliminating need for expensive future road improvements. • Better preserves original character and symmetry of existing neighborhoods by minimizing collector street traffic. • Promotes and protects a safer environment for future playground. We have provided several alternative road configurations for your consideration. We do not profess to be city planners, but think these concepts illustrate possible solutions to the neighborhood's concerns with the C.L.U.P.'s connection of Interlachen Blvd to Malibu Drive. Thank you for your consideration regarding this important matter. We look forward to discussing this proposal with you at the Edina City Council meeting on July 18, 1994. Sincerely, Interlachen /Parkwood Knolls Coalition Dale Renner - Interlachen Lisa Fish - Parkwood Knolls f- . _ . - _ . 2f�'.•. li.�y n�Wl w••;1 if �J;9 ±q,�5)er��cr� t 9T' ` �^ r 1 _ _ - - -_ LA ':w :�uaai.t4ity.warw+l�rc►Wr�''I- _ �' �rH'r'{Fk' \ � 5 - - - _'��-'' -- - \ - �y�r�i'�w�•Y —t �'' a' ,� � � �.J � Ott' } S: %!C *r r — . r _ � _— �, �_- � \ I ✓ �� '. ..fir —� .. _ , . 1— __ �t. .. � {. '�.� tij l.�i% -- _ �-1 � . _'tom:__. - -_�_" _— 1� '� � _... , f`;. —• _ �'a'K.I...J.e �.•. _ ._ T - . r 1� ••ter ' I - 3 I __ - ` � —' - 'mot' '' _ � ` • / /) ' — :r- '�•. -�. -_ •, .. �'r r ,,• i _ — _— 1` . _ • •" � )� a'� }fir `' SIP e� - __� j ~ _l•�qt .. 1rM1It" R..�lt.! iy' x 1.. �„rl "S ` .� 7 �- � ,r `` ,rte _ -!• _Y S _ �•. f�}• -�-- - _ - i ` - � . E f —___: '. � i `� _ , . ,I 4rcrvvyCSr ,Tn'rv�'rr... +� .. p, _ _ - - ,_I _ - _ _ -_ _ - i`�a,4� �rSh`/ tliie�• isrFltbi 'frrff�IYr�'taMa4Y,ci:.:4'�` ,-" — _ • �; , 1 - 4�ykv(ddit'q`f%Gi •K r..l•dW>, - loz �. I- - --- - c w= � •�� J /K� "ti-~ /rte • \.� . - \ C. ..o n iderson A Assoclafes p11 RKW000 KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION Ing • Land Dirvelopment 11-NA. MINNESOTA .rC 5v . IC7 u.".M•., UN 5�;ti r. ..w nu.-1 BY PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONST CO ELUINARY PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 70F. o e 4 REPORT RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III.A. FROM: Francis Hoffman.----'---' ❑ Consent City Engineer =�� ,% Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 18 July, 1994 ❑ To Council SUBJECT: Easement Vacation Action Q Motion Lot 15, Block 1, Southdale First Addition ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize encroachment on the easement via a document that would meet legal requirements. Info /Background: During a real estate transaction, it was discovered that a portion of a home at 6900 Cornelia Drive was situated on a portion of a storm sewer easement. This easement has a large storm pipe going into Lake Cornelia and is situated very close to the wall of the home. The pipe is located a few feet below the house and has not been a problem. Staff would recommend that a document be developed with the assistance of the City Attorney which would allow both pipe and house coexist but clear up the title issue for the property. Ar ui/15/94 13:28 F:I 612 340 2644 DORSEY WHITNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: July 15, 1994 RE: Proposed Partial Vacation of Storm Sewer Easement - 6900 Cornelia Drive The City has received a request for a partial vacation of a 10 foot wide storm sewer easement located at 6900 Cornelia Drive. In connection with a recent sale of this property it was discovered that a portion of the garage on the property is encroaching over the easement area. Attached is a drawing which shows the location of the garage and of the easement. I understand from Fran Hoffman that a 54 -inch storm sewer pipe is located in the easement area. Because of the close proximity of the storm sewer pipe to the garage I would recommend that the City not vacate any portion of the easement. In lieu of vacating the easement the City Council could consent to the encroachment of the garage on the easement area and grant the homeowner the right to maintain and use the garage provided that W no work will be done to the garage that would damage the City's storm sewer pipe or further encroach on the City's easement; (ii) the homeowner would indemnify and hold the City harmless from any additional costs as a result of the encroachment which the City may incur in connection with any repair or reconstruction of the storm sewer pipe; and (iii) if the garage is ever destroyed or removed, no further encroachment :over the easement area is permitted. This consent would be contained in an agreement that would be recorded in the real estate records and run with the land. I have asked Mr. Hugh Bishop at Bishop Title, Inc., the title company being used by the homeowner, whether this type of City consent clears up the title problems caused by the encroachment. I hope to have a response from Mr. Bishop prior to Monday's City Council meeting. JPG:cmn DORSEY & WHITNEY A P—T—A wr Immvowc Peonmunw. Co,,,,W m ( OVER) Lei 002 \� PORCH 180 r , A . S REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L HUGHES DATE: JULY 18, 1994 ORDINANCE 1994 -6 AND ORDINANCE 1994 -7 Recommendation: Grant Second Reading. Info/Background: Agenda Item # IV. A . & B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution © Ordinance ❑ Discussion On July 5, 1994, the City Council granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 1994 -6 and Ordinance No. 1994 -7. Ordinance No. 1994 -6 provides a permit process for sidewalk cafes. Ordinance No. 1994 -7 amends the sign ordinance to permit larger projecting signs in the commercial district. The Council directed staff to include certain revisions to both ordinances. These revisions have now been made and have been underlined on the attached copies. Staff recommends Second Reading of both ordinances, as amended. ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT SIDEWALK CAFES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 1200.02 of Section 1200 of the City Code is amended by adding a new paragraph Q as follows: "Q. Sidewalk cafes as defined by Section 1230.01 of this Code subject to a permit issued pursuant to Subsection 1230.07 of this Code." Section 2. Subsection 1230.01 of Section 1230 of the City Code is amended by adding a new definition as follows: "Sidewalk Cafe. Tables, chairs, benches and appurtenant equipment located on a sidewalk (i) for the exclusive use by patrons of an abutting food establishment as defined by Section 720 of this Code or ii) where the service of food or beverages is offered to persons using such tables, chairs, and benches." Section 3. Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 of Section 1230 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "O. Consume intoxicating or non - intoxicating malt liquor, wine, or intoxicating liquor, as defined in Section 900 of this Code, except that: 1. Non - intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the City or by an authorized agent of the City may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 in the following places; a. Inside the clubhouse of a golf course. b. Inside a programmed park or indoor recreational facility located in a park, except picnic shelters, warming houses, ice arenas or maintenance buildings. c. Within the ballfield complex of Van Valkenburg Park. 2. Non- intoxicating malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, and wine may be consumed at sidewalk cafes which are licensed in accordance with Section 900 of this code and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to Subsection 1230.07 of this Code." Section 4. Paragraph R of Subsection 1230.02 of Section 1230 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "R. Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy a street or sidewalk to sell any farm produce or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling of services except as provided in Subsection 1230.07 of this Code." Section 5. Section 1230 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subsection 1230.07 as follows: "1230.07. Special Permits for Pushcarts and Sidewalk Cafes. Notwithstanding the requirements of this Section 1230, certain pushcarts and sidewalk cafes are permitted on sidewalks subject to the requirements of this Subsection. Subd. 1 Pushcarts. Pushcarts, as defined by Section 720 of this Code, may be located on sidewalks within the area included in the plan prepared by the HRA entitled, "50th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to this Subdivision. A.: In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued for a pushcart unless the following requirements are met: 1. The pushcart must be licensed in accordance with Section 720 of this Code. 'b 2. The applicant for a permit must possess a valid food establishment license or take -out food license, pursuant to Section 720 of this Code, for a food establishment located in the 50th and France commercial area. 3. The pushcart shall not exceed 8 feet in length, 4 feet in width, and 8 feet in height. 4. The pushcart shall be equipped with casters or wheels to permit ease of movement. 5. The pushcart shall be equipped with facilities for the disposal of trash generated by the pushcart. B. In addition to the requirements of Section 720 of this Code, the following requirements shall apply to the operation of pushcarts: 1. Pushcarts shall be parked on public sidewalks and walkways only in those locations specified in the permit. 2. Pushcarts shall be stored indoors following the close of business each day. 3. Only food or beverages for immediate consumption may be offered from the pushcart. 2 4. Cleaning, servicing, and maintenance of the pushcart shall be undertaken only in an area approved by the Sanitarian. C. Permits issued pursuant to this Subdivision shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. D. The number of permits which may be in force under this Subd. 1. at any one time shall not exceed six. Subd. 2 Sidewalk Cafes. Sidewalk cafes may be located on sidewalks subject to a permit issued by the City Manager pursuant to this Subdivision. Applications for a sidewalk cafe permit shall be made on forms supplied by the Clerk and shall include a plan drawn to scale which illustrates the exact location of the proposed sidewalk cafe together with distances and dimensions of the adjoining buildings, the sidewalk, the distance to and location of the travelled portion of the street and distances to all obstructions in the vicinity. The application shall be accompanied Iby the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. If the application is denied, the application fee less $100 shall be returned to the applicant. A. In addition to the requirements of Section _160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued or renewed for a sidewalk cafe unless the following requirements are met: 1. The applicant must possess a valid food establishment license pursuant to Section 720 of this Code. 2. A distance of at least 200 feet shall be maintained between the nearest point of the sidewalk cafe to the nearest point of property used for residential purposes. 3. The applicant must furnish to the Clerk, evidence that public liability insurance has been procured for any death or personal injury arising from the ownership, maintenance, or operation of the sidewalk cafe in amounts not less than $100,000 for injury to or death of one person, or $300,000 for any one incident, and not less than $50,000 for damage to property arising from any one incident. The applicant shall maintain such insurance in effect at all times during the term of the permit. The City shall be named as an additional named insured in the policy providing such insurance. 4. The applicant shall indemnify and hold the City and the City's officials and emplovees harmless from anv loss. cost. damage and expenses_ arising 5. The area occupied by the sidewalk cafe shall abut and shall be operated as part of the food establishment operated by the applicant. No part of the sidewalk cafe shall adjoin any premises other than the applicant's food establishment. KI 6. The City Manager shall find that the sidewalk cafe will not unduly restrict the safe usage of the sidewalk by the public after taking into consideration the location of obstructions, vehicular traffic and other impediments to the passage of pedestrians. The City Manager shall renew a permit only upon finding that the operation of the sidewalk cafe complied with all provisions vision and did not constitute a nuisance as B. In addition to the requirements of Section 720 of this Code, the following requirements shall apply to the operation of sidewalk cafes. 1. Only food or beverages for immediate consumption may be offered for sale. 2. Intoxicating or non - intoxicating malt liquor or wine may be consumed only if the sidewalk cafe is licensed pursuant to Section 900 of this Code. 3. No expansion of the area occupied by the sidewalk cafe from that shown on the permit application shall be made. 4. No tables, chairs, furnishings, planters, railings or other obstructions shall be placed or remain on the sidewalk between November 1 and April 1 except on a day to day basis when the sidewalk cafe is open for business. 5. The applicant shall maintain the sidewalk cafe in a clean and sanitary condition as required by Section 720 of this Code. 6. The applicant shall promptly replace or repair any damage to the sidewalk or other public property caused by the applicant's use of the sidewalk as a sidewalk cafe. C. Permits issued pursuant to this subdivision shall expire on March 31, of each, calendar year." Section 6. Section 185 of the City Code is amended by adding a new fee as follows: SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 1230 1230.07, Sidewalk Cafe $500.00 261 Subd. 2 Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. City Clerk 4 Mayor a ORDINANCE NO. 19947 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460 TO PROVIDE NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR PROJECTING SIGNS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 12 of Subsection 460.03 of Section 460 of the City Code is amended as follows: "Subd. 12. Projecting Signs. Projecting signs shall be permitted only in the Planned Commercial District, subject to the following restrictions: A. The maximum sign area shall be 20 square feet per facing. B. Not less than eight feet of clearance shall be provided between the* sidewalk elevation and the lowest point of the projecting sign. C. Signs shall project from the face of the building no more than the lesser of, i) one -third of the sidewalk width or, ii) six feet. Sidewalk width shall be measured perpendicular to the face of the building at the proposed sign location. D. The maximum sign area of wall signs located on the same building of the projecting sign shall not exceed five percent of the wall area. E. Proof of Insurance and indemnification shall be provided in accordance with Subd. 5 of Subsection 460.067 Section 2. Subd. 5 of Subsection 460.06 of Section 460 of the City Code is amended by adding a new last sentence as follows: "The owner shall also indemnifv and hold the Ci 's officials and caused by the AGENDA NO. V.A. July 13, 1994 Mr. Fred Richards, Mayor City of Edina 50th & Hwy 100 Edina MN 55424 BRAEMAR TENNIS COURTS Mayor Richards, Your City Council action of 7 -5 -94 to remove the Braemar tennis courts has not set well with the neighborhood nor many other residents of Edina. No one was aware of any "study ", nor apprized of any results. If they were, they would have advised the Park & Rec. department to fix the surface. Braemar tennis courts from their beginning have not been the best, but the courts were so popular that it was difficult to get on these courts. Often because of the courts' play we would have to go to Creek Valley or the Edina school courts before the Lewis courts were built. Lewis courts relieved the situation a bit, but in spite of this, the courts remained popular. When Park & Rec neglected and allowed the Braemar tennis courts to run down, the usage dwindled. Actually, the Braemar courts were unsafe due to cracks, and loose sand from the ant nests. The weeds began to appear to the point one could loose a ball on the courts in the weeds. This three to four years ago, so it is no wonder the usage fell off. This summer of '94 the weeds have flourished, then the nets were removed some time ago before the council's action on 7 -5 -94 to destroy and remove the courts Since it will likely cost the city more to remove the courts (certainly many times the original cost to replace) than to properly resurface we neighbors, and other, users, who are all taxpayers should have the right to have Braemar tennis courts restored to a playable condition. We have no doubt that Braemar tennis courts will again be one of the most used courts in the city. We ask that you direct Park & Rec to put these courts back in playable condition. Thank you. /) Sincerely, 1 Hary y and Grace ow 621 Loch Moor Drive Edina MN 55439 /, FM? ED LNA CITY Y COUNT' I I, BRAEMAR. TENNIS COURTS The motion passed by the Edict a t. Ltd- (:aunt i.l •)n .Jrt.lv 5 . 1.994 to remove the Braemar tennis courts was riot: aerierai.ly known to the neighborhood residents. tie .ask that. your reconsider the pLan ro remove the courts. 'The -Urtr't:s were riot: tisvd r.'ec enl.l. v because t.11e surface was strewn wi I-.11 cracks and weeds. Pr-ol +curl maint.ainefi. these courts w i L1 have a pos i ti ve Luipact on I1rolrert_'v values. Removing, the courts w i I I Likely have the opposite effect. The res Ldent:s or Lh i s sir. fill iised l.liese c-ourl.s because (.)I" i Ls superior• LocaLion, bul, sLopped imicsurse of the rundown c-ondit.ion. Thp neighborhood children can, and cii.c.i, wa.l.lc or ride Lheir bikes to the Braemar (.7ourt-s. It. Ls Lnfleed a "rle.ighborhood" faciLity. Obviously, the cost I.c) tefir orrt these c-oi.rrLs and remove Lhe fencing; will likely be more than the cost to properly resurface. We asic that. the City Corgnc i..l rescind the order to remove and to see that proper surfacing of Braemar courts is effected as soon as possible. Respectfully submiAt.ed: Name Address Please be at the City Corrrgc-1I. meetings 7 -18 -94 on this issue. RESIDENTS RESPONSE TO REMOVAL OF BRAEMAR TENNIS COURTS 1994 Edina Park and Recreation Department RESPONSE oppose, use courts oppose oppose, only courts with bathroom nearby, wind doesn't whip through oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose, turn over in neighborhood, biking distance oppose oppose oppose, close by, enconomics, turn over oppose oppose oppose oppose - letter oppose 7/18 Frank Smith Gleason Circle support removal, hardly used, Lewis close by RESIDENT ADDRESS PHONE 7/15 Kathy Johnston Hyde Park Circle 941 -5527 7/15 Dr. Pinkus 7/15 Mr. S. Gillman 7120 Gleason 941 -6430 7/15 John & Ann Cronin 944 -3964 7/15 Kris McGrath 6212 Braeburn Cr 941 -5134 7/15 Ann Bryan 5836 Long Brake Tr 829 -5708 7/15 Bruce Shapiro 7128 Mark„Terrace 7/15 Todd Dyste 942 -8385 7/15 John Otterli 7121 Schey 943 -0894 7/15 Mrs. & Mr. Viera 7131 Gleason 944 -6819 7/15 John Trohl Mark Terrace 829 -0924 7/15 Mrs. Lacy 7/18 Elaine Skrenter 7/18 Annette Anderson 7008 Mark Terrace 941 -5169 7/18 Mary Jane Yue 6812 Gleason Rd. 829 -0862 7/18 Dick & Phyllis Connrod 7133 Gleason Rd. 7/18 Millie Carr 7204 Schey Dr. 7/18 Darcy & Mike Dahnert 7318 Claredon Dr. 7/18 Marcia Treno 7/18 Margaret & Wayne Twito 941 -2336 7/18 Bill Greer 7125 Schey Dr. 941 -4086 7/18 Lane Jorgenson 7132 Mark Terrace 829 -9322 RESPONSE oppose, use courts oppose oppose, only courts with bathroom nearby, wind doesn't whip through oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose oppose, turn over in neighborhood, biking distance oppose oppose oppose, close by, enconomics, turn over oppose oppose oppose oppose - letter oppose 7/18 Frank Smith Gleason Circle support removal, hardly used, Lewis close by P13T ''ION FOR 1?.U:I:NA CITY COUNCIL BRAEMAR 'rENNl.ti (70URTS The motion gassed by I. he Edina C.i.Ly (jounc.i.1 Lit .Jiily 5, L994 I: .o remove the Br- aerna,r• Lenn is courts was riot generally known to the nei.ghbor•hood r:•esidenl,s. We. ask L.hal. rout- r-econsider Lite plan to remove the courts. The coutAs. were riot: used recent -ly because Lhe surface was strewn w.i.Lh cracks and weeds. L'r•operly maintained, these, courts will have a positive i.mpa.ct on property values. Reinovi.ng the c:odi•ts will likely have the opposite effect. The residents of this area rrsed Lhese courts because of its super-101" location, b►tl, st.oi)r)e(l bf- t—mtse -of Lite rundown condition. The ne i ghbo r.•hood c-h.i .l d ren L',111, and did, walk or- vide Lhe i r• bikes Lo . the Br-stc mmrr Cimr•I.s. It. is indevd "noighhorhoo'd" I,ac..i I i.ty. Obviously, Lhe c=ost. Lo Lear- ottt. these c;our•t,s and .ve love the fenc=ing wi.L.l. li.ke:Ly - be more Lhan the cost to property r-esuvface. We ask Llli :-IL the C.i. t. }- Cour►c.. i .L r•esc i rid the order to remove s,tncl Lo see Lhat proper- sur- faci.n of 11r.aFrnar• c.our-Ls is effected as soon as possible. Respect.fuli.v submi.tl,ed: Name �lv y �ti1�s.I� IN Address -7u 1 EztLv] a I )\V1 N Please be at the City Council meeting 7-1.8-94 on this issue. AGENDA ITEM V . A Bill Greer 7125 Schey Drive July 16, 1994 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 612/941-4086 To: Fred Richards Jack Rice Peggy Kelly Glenn Smith Jane Paulus John Keprios Bill Jenkins This is in regard to the two tennis courts in Braemar Park. My home is 200 yards from these tennis courts. I had become accustomed to the thunk of tennis balls all day long on summer days. But no more. I have discussed the possible abandonment of these courts over the past year with Bob Kojetin and with Bill Jenkins. These were the arguments for abandonment. 1. It is too costly to resurace the courts, with a cost figure mentioned of about $17,000. 2. The ground under the courts would have to be reconditioned. 3. Usage of these courts had diminished, but there would be a test period which would extend through August of this year. Let me address these arguments: 1. I have played on the Hyland courts off of 94th street in Bloomington which were resurfaced about three years ago. Cost: $4,000. Vendor's name available on request. 2. An Edina resident whose engineering career has been in soils and water control told me the ground under the tennis courts should certainly be stabilized after 20 years. 3. Usage of these courts has diminished because maintenance has been abandoned. The surface has become unplayable and the weeds in the courts are high. I was a member of the Edina Park Board during the acquisition and development of Braemar Park. It was originally intended as a multi -use park. Now,.if the tennis courts are taken out, the entire eastern 7 /8ths of the park is devoted to a single activity: golf. (over) Braemar tennis courts - -2 I understand the golf courses produce revenue, as do the ice arenas. Baseball and softball diamonds and soccer fields don't return revenue. Nor do tennis courts. The Police Department and the Fire Department don't produce revenue, but we certainly have them in place. I pay my share of taxes and I trade at Edina Liquor Stores. But I'm forced to travel to Minnetonka, Hopkins and Bloomington to find open courts in playable shape. Sincerely, Bill Greer -V A Ow AGENDA ITEM: Vi. C. jLe,vt,.A, DATE: JULY 18, 1994 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL 'FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $57000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: AERATION SYSTEM - ARROWHEAD LAKE Company Bid Amount 1. CLEAN FLO LABORATORIES 1. $95,735.27 2. No other bidders 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED BID: Clean Flo Laboratories GENERAL INFORMATION: The City Council authorized a fish stocking and aeration program for Arrowhead Lake on June 6, 1994. The proposed aeration system is identical to the system in Indianhead Lake. The Clean Flo system is the only system which does not create open water conditions in the winter. This is an important consideration for liability purposes. Therefore, no other bids were obtained. i km ture (within budget) Kenneth Department E] (not within budget) John Wallin, Finance Director TO: Mayor & City Council 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 18 July, 1994 AGENDA ITEM VI-D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: one Manhole Puller /Extractor Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. MacQueen Equipment Inc. 1• $ $ 14,286.97 2. 2. $ 3. 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MacQueen Equipment, Inc. $ 14,286.97 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for a special attachment used on a tractor /backhoe to cut out manholes so that the manholes may be repaired and raised to a proper height. This piece is a patented new process developed by a metro - public works person. It is now being used in some of the adjacent suburbs. This should deal with the ever ongoing problem of manholes settling or asphalt or concrete heights being changed due to overlay. This purchase will be from the equipment replacement fund. Signature ;-- The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Utilities De not within bud et Jq Kenneth Rosa d, City ilin, Fjoance Director +; r REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CRAIG SWANSON TRAFFIC SAFETY DATE: JULY 18, 1994 J: ft TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Recommendation: Recommend adoption of the report. Info/Background: Agenda Item # VII . A . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Section A (1) is continued from June 20, 1994, Council meeting. Information and data included on that topic. e' TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW JULY 6, 1994 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 6, 1994. Staff present included the Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer, the Chief of Police, the Traffic Safety Coordinator, and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the July 18, 1994, Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. (1) Request to review intersection controls on St. Johns Avenue between Golf Terrace and W. 58th Street. The staff discussed the Residential Stop Sign Policy and the Multiway Stop Sign Policy as adopted by the Edina City Council in 1993. Attention was brought to a number of statements in those policies. Specifically, the statement of purpose which states stop signs should not be installed inappropriately where they are ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause of needless noise. Additionally, the policy states that stop signs shall not be installed individually in an attempt to control speed or control volume based on the fact that they are ineffective for such purposes. St. Johns Avenue is a very low volume residential street carrying less than 150 vehicles daily. Residential streets typically carry up to 1000 vehicles daily. Speeds along St. Johns Avenue are low as compared to residential streets with an 85 percentile speed in the lower 20 MPH range and an average of 3 vehicles daily traveling over 30 MPH and no vehicles traveling over 35 MPH. Volume and speed surveys were conducted during a weekday, Wednesday and Thursday for a continuous 48 hour period. No accidents for a three year search period were reported at like intersections of St. Johns Avenue with Golf Terrace, Lakeview Drive, Oak Drive, Lexington Avenue, W. 56th Street, or Tower Street. One June, 1994, accident was reported at St. Johns Avenue at W. Woodland Road. I TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 6, 1994 Page 2 Volumes on streets crossing St. Johns Avenue approximate less than 300 vehicles daily. In light of the staff discussions all above intersections then were discussed as related to the Stop Sign policies. The facts do not support the installation of any additional stop signs along St. Johns Avenue with one exception. Westbound Lexington Avenue serves as an outlet to a church parking lot. Customarily, parking lot exits stop upon entering a street and a stop sign should be installed at that location. The staff further discussed stop sign patterns in Edina and southwest Minneapolis. Edina has installed stop signs on a warranted basis in most instances. Current policies reflect those warrants. Southwest Minneapolis has a "grid" pattern of Stop signs. The typical pattern is every-other street a stop sign is posted At the middle intersection the street is a through street with that intersection roadway stopping. The driver has an expectation of the pattern and drives accordingly. Routes avoiding stops are sought. Compliance is generally low. After this pattern was instituted, few, if any, stop sign requests are heard. Edina has many uncontrolled intersections. , In most instances the accident rate is very low at these intersections and if there is a pattern of accidents, controls are installed. The larger question on this matter is the answer to the question, "Are Edina's uncontrolled intersections unsafe ?" And, "Is the current warrant process appropriate or should the City consider a patterned system ?" The staff concluded and recommends the installation of stop sign for westbound Lexington Street at St. Johns Avenue and that a total City computerized map of existing intersection controls be produced and presented to the City Council for review no later than November, 1994. (2) Request for signage on Delaney Boulevard to control speed. The staff reviewed speed and volume data from Delaney Boulevard. An average of 560 vehicles travel Delaney Boulevard daily with an 85 percentile speed approaching 35 MPH. This speed is somewhat greater than most residential roadways. Also, several speeds were recorded that would normally be cited by the Police Department. +r TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 6, 1994 Page 3 Delaney Boulevard has several curves and difficult long -range sight lines. The staff recommends winding road signs with a 25 MPH advisory be posted at the north and south ends of Delaney Boulevard. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. (1) Request for signage on Cornelia Drive (7200 - 7340) to control speed. The staff discussed low volumes and principally neighborhood traffic on Cornelia Drive. Also, the primary offenders in the neighborhood have been identified by the requestor. The staff recommends the denial of signage on Cornelia Drive and the request be referred to the Police Department's attention. (2) Request for informational signage in the area of Beard Court to direct drivers who may be looking for a crossing of Minnehaha Creek away from beard Court. The staff discussed the issue and the fact that no other informational signage of this type has been installed by the City. The facts indicate that a "Dead End" or "No Outlet" signs are not appropriate. The facts also indicate that Beard Court is an open view area that is visible to drivers. No signage is recommended. The staff recommends denial of the signage request. (3) Request for signage on the east curve of Amy Drive. This request is a repeat from June, 1994. At that time the staff recommended and the Council directed a informational letter be sent to the neighborhood educating them as to the speed limit and safety practices. This letter was sent during late June. The staff reaffirms its recommendation of June to deny the request for signage and the requestor should be contacted to determine the effectiveness of the letter. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 6, 1994 Page 4 (4) Request for multiway stop sign at the intersection of Malibu Drive and Telemark Trail to help control speed. The staff reviewed the facts related to the intersection. The same request was made in 1993 and denied. Extensive data was collected then and it is substantially unchanged to date. Speeding does occur on the roadway but it is considerable north of Telemark Trail. The staff recommends denial of the request based on lack of warrants. The staff further recommends the Police Department continue their enforcement efforts in the area. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Request for multiway stop signs on Tracy Avenue at the ramps to TH 62 (Crosstown). The staff recommends that a warrant study be conducted in the area and that MDOT be consulted on the matter. The issue will be brought back for further discussion. RESIDENTIAL STOP SIGN POUCY H PURPOSE: The purpose of the residential stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for stop signs in residential areas. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. Their recommendation will be shared with you and if you disagree with it or can bring forth additional facts you can appear at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting and present your viewpoint. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential intersection should be left uncontrolled. 4. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 5. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 6. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. RESIDENTIAL STOP SIGN POLICY (Continued) 7. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 8. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 9. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY STOP PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs. Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. Their recommendation will be shared with you and if you disagree with it or can bring forth additional facts you can appear at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting and present your viewpoint. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain unchanged. 4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation: a. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED) b. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multiway stop installation in a 12 -month period. Such accidents include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right angle collisions. C. Minimum traffic volumes: 1. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hours, but 3. When the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. 5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. =J z) 3 L-AK E 14AR ✓E,( 41 J Z Q h Cohtrof 1� 13 V, (STO P) OGG V0 "'1 C- (2 qAr.) 0 0 1l() P H / �3 S e % t e, S > p vva.r C KK Volcu,(c LAKEVIEW OR E j 300 vt1.Am. ( 2SU Voi,(/Y( e, OAK f) LEXIN6TOV j33 Vclu�h� 4 WS-6th 5T z!- z.s►tiP�� TOWER r U 3OMPH 30D W. WOODLAIVO � 13.So v° W 5-q T N sr I� TO FRA IVCE A 'I y3 00 1/o, �91riA. �r� Obi C� • '�V�bRPOMti�� Tenn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council From: Date: Subject: David Velde, Director Health Department July 15, 1994 Herbicide use on public lands. RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item # V11. B Consent f❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends j❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution _I Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommend that the Park and Recreation Department work with the Health Department and the Public Works Department in creating a classification of park properties and recommend an application process that would limit and reduce use of herbicides in response to citizens concern. As an alternative to herbicide use, the Community Health Services Advisory Committee recommends investigating Integrated Pest Management (IPM), a program emphasizing fertilizing, seeding, and mowing. This program would be reviewed by the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for implementation on proven effectiveness. INFOBACKGROUND: As directed by the Edina City Council, the Community Health Services Advisory Committee met on July 13, 1994 and discussed the use of herbicides on public lands. Including parkland, open space and facilities. w. Memo To: Mayor Fred Richards and Edina City Council From: Matthew Peterson, Chair Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee Date: July 18, 1994 Subject: Edina CHSAC Recommendation to the City Council Regarding City Use of Pesticides on Park Grounds and other Public Property. The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee ( CHSAC) is appearing at this July 18, 1994 Council meeting to present its recommendation to City officials and Edina residents on the matter of City use of pesticides on Edina park grounds and other public properties in the City. This issue was referred to the CHSAC for our review and a recommendation by the Mayor and Council in late June after members of the Council and City staff received letters and calls from Edina residents and citizen's groups concerned with the City practice of spraying chemicals on park grounds that can pose potentially serious health hazards. Also of serious concern to Edina residents is the fact that this spraying has been carried out with no advance posting or on site warnings that an area may have been recently sprayed. A special meeting of the CHSAC was held on July 13 at city hall where the members of the commission, concerned individual residents, the League of Women Voters, and city staff persons John Keprios - Parks Director and Elliot - City Sanitarian discussed policy options and implementation ideas. To correctly consider our recommendation please recognize the definitions we have given to the following terms: Pesticide This term includes all of the following chemical agents commonly used in the care of park properties: Herbicides Insecticides ) Fungicides Fertilizer Fertilizer -only products are not included in the term pesticide and are not considered part of this recommendation. In its briefest form, the recommendation of the CHSAC on this matter is as follows: The CHSAC recommends to the Edina City Council that it immediately require city departments to place a moratorium on the spraying or application of pesticides. This moratorium involves and applies to the grounds, waters, facilities and equipment at the 38 city parks and at miscellaneous public properties in the City. This moratorium does not, at this time, apply to the revenue facilities in the City parks system including the Braemar and Normandale Golf Courses, Braemar Arena, and Edinborough facilities or to Arneson Gardens, the Courtney fields in the Braemar complex, or the ball fields at Van Valkenberg Park. Also not included in the moratorium are those boulevards, medians, natural areas, and city mowed areas that are not commonly or appropriately used for recreational purposes. This moratorium is to continue in effect until the Parks Department and associated city offices can research and propose an implementation plan intended to achieve the following: 07/18/94 Page 2 The discontinuance of the spraying or application of pesticides by the City or its contractors in as many locations and situations as possible. 2. Management playing fields and open grassy areas of city parks and other public properties for weed, insect and disease control by alternative means involving no or significantly less use of potentially hazardous chemicals. In general use park areas, spraying shall not be conducted for the primary purpose of improving the aesthetic appearance of grassy areas. Only more critical issues of turf management such as surface safety, wind and water erosion control, serious insect infestation, control of water runoff, and the health of trees and related vegetation shall be justification for targeted pesticide application. Inform the residents of the city regarding lower cost - reduced hazard approaches to park and grounds management. Helping citizens to accept a higher "weed tolerance" and slower acting methods of problem control. This implementation plan and new policy proposal to be presented by the Parks Department to the CHSAC for its review by March 31, 1995. A few additional interesting and important facts and concerns were part of the CHSAC considerations on this matter: 1. The Parks Department does not apply herbicides on or near playgrounds or around grills and picnic areas.. CC: 2. It was the procedure of parks employees to promptly post an area after it had been sprayed. This policy will be changed to posting before spraying if pesticides are applied. 3. Pesticides are only applied in a narrow band of weather conditions and are only applied by city employees who have been certified by the State Department of Agriculture as trained sprayer operators. Ak i Edina School District 273 has enacted a ban on all spraying. The University of Minnesota through its academic departments and its Extension division offer many progressive ideas for communities in exactly this area of concern. The State Department of Agriculture is also offering assistance to communities in this field. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: MAYOR RICHARDS DATE: JULY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Appointment of Rev. Erick Strand to the Human Relations commission to fill unexpired term to February 1, 1997, as School Representative. Info/Background: The Edina School Board has recommended appointment of Erick Strand to the Human Relations Commission to fill the unexpired term of Geoffrey McCray who has resigned from the Commission. \J INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, June 270 3.994 Volume 65, Report 412 Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Appoint Erick Strand to the Edina Human Relations Commission effective immediately through January 31, 1997. Erick Strand has indicated a willingness to serve on the Edina human Relations Commission and is one of six School Board appointees to the Commission. He will fill the unexpired term of Mr. Geoffrey McCray who found it necessary to resign from the commission. (5732 Abbott Avenue So.) Paster at Edina Community Luthdran Church, 4113 W. 54th Street Phyllis Kohler 1/31/95 Nancy Atchison 1/31/95 John Gordon 1/31/96 Sharon Ming 1/31196 Betsy Flaten 1/31/97 Edina School District Policy 18140 774 REPORWRECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: JOHN KEPRIOS PARK/RECREATION DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: PERMIT FOR DISCHARGE OF FIREARM AT BRAEMAR PARK FOR BEAVER CONTROL Recommendation: Agenda Item # y T T _ D _ Consent El Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Issue permit allowing discharge of firearm at Braemar Park for beaver control. InfoBackground: A professional pest control company, Critter Control, has been contracted to remove beaver from Nine Mile Creek within Braemar Golf Course because the beaver are causing flowage restriction which can lead to flood damage. Efforts to trap the beavers have been unsuccessful. The next step to remove the beavers, as recommended by Critter Control is to shoot them. In accordance with City Code #1000.03, 'Discharge of Firearms Prohibited Without a Permit;" the Council is asked to approve a permit for Critter Control professionals to discharge 12 gauge shotguns for the purpose of beaver control at Braemar Park from July 19, 1994, through August 15, 1994. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Agenda Item # VH.E. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ DATE: JULY 18, 1994 I Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF POLLING LOCATION - PRECINCT 19 Recommendation: Adoption by the Council of the following: ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion x❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that Calvary Lutheran Church, 6817 Antrim Road, be designated as the polling place for Precinct 19. InfoBackground: Voters in Precinct 19 have been voting at the Brookview Church, 5017 West 70th Street. In contacting the church earlier this year, I was told that the church may cease its ministry at that location. This has now been confirmed and the future of the building is uncertain at this time as it is now under the jurisdiction of the North Central District Office. I am proposing to change the polling location for Precinct 19 to Calvary Lutheran Church on Antrim Road. Calvary Church has offered their facility for elections (see attached). If Council approves, registered voters will be sent notice of the change at least 30 days prior to the Primary Election as required by State Statute. 01 t`.:. L_ T v calvary Lutheran church 6/17/94 Marcella 11. rDaehn City Clerk City of Edina +801 West 50th :street Ed na , "ii-i i23 -1394 Oaar Marcella= At our meeting this week the C;aivary unanimou -ly to offer our building for polling place for future elections. Church Council voted the city's use as a Pastor Jerome F Larson Organist Randy Bourne Choir Director Heather Dick Missionary Debra Jensen Secretary Barb Hartwell Custodian Bob Robinson We appreciate the opportunity to help out in this way and will tr to make our f:-.t. ility as comfo-i table as possible for Y01,11- ' 7 t,faff of . "olurt��r�. wi do have a learning center Isere at Cavary that uses the building du)-iriq L�i <: _;"; but they hav: ay7-eed to yivc� up the Fellowship fall on election days. We would ask that your volunteers use the church library r_.r their lunch room and coffee breaks. There is c, small kitchen ai-ca in this Dolt. 1 "he regular kitchen receives very hard use during the day by the learning center. We hope that our facilities will work out well .:::r t'i•ti_ purpose and feel free to contact us at any time with auEstions or f=urther information. racer- y yours, R v , erome: L<_,i son 6 11 Antrim load • ' dmil, yllinncsota 554-3-9 • gltone 9=11 -1251 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING LOCATION EDINA PRECINCT 19 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that Calvary Lutheran Church, 6817 Antrim Road, Edina, MN 55439, be designated as the polling location for Precinct 19. ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 1994. CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct coy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of July 18, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of July, 1994. City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: JULY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: PETITION FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 4 AND LOT 5 - MARK DALQUIST ADDITION Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA X❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adoption of a resolution setting August 15, 1994, as hearing date on the petition for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4 and Lot 5 of f the MARK DALQUIST ADDITION. InfoBackground: A petition has been received by the City requesting partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4 and Lot 5 of the MARK DALQUIST ADDITION. Staff would recommend that August 15, 1994, be set as hearing date to consider the petition. Copy of petition is attached. Staff would also recommend that notice of the hearing be sent to all property owners who were noticed for the public hearing on the plat. � 1 • � I CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7500 West 78th Street Edina, Minnesota July 6, 1994 55439 (612) 947 -3000 Mr. Craig Larson fax (612) 947 -3030 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Conservation Easement Harold Woods Lane Edina, MN Dear Mr. Larson: Enclosed is a plat of the subject property showing the 100 feet restricted area which was granted to the City of Edina required by the city council upon subdivision of this property. This letter is to request vacation of,a portion of the restricted area on two of the lots as shown by hatch marks on the enclosed plat and described as follows: Lot #4 Request a 19 feet vacation which would reduce the restricted area from 100 feet to 81 feet. Lot #5 Request a 24 feet vacation which would reduce the restricted area from 100 feet to 76 feet. In both cases, the 25 feet Natural Condition Area would remain unchanged and I believe this is the more important restriction to safeguard the ponding areas. I am in the process of redesigning homes for actual clients that I have been working with on the above two lots. Both clients have made additional floor plan concessions to shape each home so it will best conform to the buildable area. We have made significant progress in limiting the additional space needed for these homes. The 2 lots will be staked prior to the public hearing showing the current 100 feet restricted line as well as the requested vacation area. I hope this will be helpful to view the site constraints first hand and to realize the substantial restricted area that would remain after the granting of this application. I will advise you when the lots have been staked. Si ely, o%-^— Ronald E. Clark REC /cw Enclosure Designer/ Builder/ Developer MN Builder License #0001220 PROPOSED VACATION That part of Lot 4, Block 1, MARK DALQUIST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying within a strip of land 19.00 feet in width and the southerly line of said strip is described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 3 said Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degree 28 minutes 37 seconds West, along the west line of said Lot 3, a distance of 148.07 feet; thence North 77 degrees 07 minutes 51 seconds East 26.15 feet; thence South 53 degrees 44 minutes 46 seconds East 47.63 feet; thence South 71 degrees 33 minutes 54 seconds East 41.31 feet; thence on a bearing of East 46.93 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 55 degrees 41 minutes 32 seconds East 74.03 feet; thence North 23 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds East 35.84 feet; thence North 55 degrees 10 minutes 32 seconds East 57.76 feet; thence North 74 degrees 51 minutes 09 seconds East 110.84 feet to the intersection with the east line of said Lot 4 and said line there terminating. #9893 05/23/94 Revised 07/05/94 PROPOSED VACATION That part of Lot 5, Block 1, MARK DALQUIST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying within a strip of land 23.00 feet in width and the northerly line of said strip is described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2 said Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 31 minutes 23 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 2, a distance of 35.17 feet; thence North 14 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East 110.71 feet; thence North 28 degrees 04 minutes 21 seconds East 56.72 feet; thence North 40 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East 92.28 feet; thence North 50 degrees 38 minutes 26 seconds East 66.44 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 79 degrees 41 minutes 43 seconds East 61.91 feet; thence South 71 degrees 33 minutes 54 seconds East 126.17 feet; thence North 74 degrees 03 minutes 17 seconds East 34.18 feet to the intersection with the east line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. #9893 05/23/94 Revised 07/05/94 r 1 . • 0�1 m _ r 1 H M 937.60 CONTOUR LINE---------" - -- ?; ` ° \ 2 N \ Ile LIN SETBRCK LINE ' ------------ 1 • V �p�� 9 �' ` o a O i T Ir rn d x Ln rl I — . 1 A z T3 WOODS LANE H a NO C) °.m N Im O ru y p I I \ ' 493' 79' 4 l . .SETBRCK LINE 61. I / S 33- I / ro �14 I N -- .ti�`` ul -,l s OP I A- 0� fN SP19c f TJ' ON R Eq ' r 19 I I C) \ cn ' c.n z I ; r, I r UR 0.9 60 CpN .o I 'O IU � 5 - O •tit. .. 35.17 N 89631'23" E I SOUTH LINE OF L 0 t, 2 � } I ,: N ,�'. rN REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: JULY 18, 1994 1:_ 1 O1 PETITION FOR VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT - LOT 5, BLACK 7 WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET (3617 W. 55TH STREET) Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Re. esolution ❑ Ordinance ' ❑ Discussion Adoption of a resolution setting August 15, 1994, as hearing date on the petition for vacation of a utility easement on Lot 5, Block 7, WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET. Info/Background: A petition has been received with the City requesting vacation of a utility easement on Lot 5, Block 7, WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET, located at 3617 West 55th Street. Staff would recommend that August 15, 1994, be set as hearing date to consider the petition. Copy of petition is attached. e CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION Date Initiated 099LA I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all'Df the following described public right of way: Street ( Drainage Easement. Alley Other (describe) Utility Easement Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? nn Legal description of area proposed to be vacated: Re Wliff-01MMM W-1*�ftWERWO PW'= — WWWAMPRE G . Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail.the proposed vacation area. Applicant (p //Tint e) ' Signature (" Address Eck ►nom , M� ssy io Telephone q 2.q - S IO y S Fee: $100.00 3800 M.S. 412.851 s July 5, 1994 City of Edina City Council Edina, MN Dear Sir or Madam: We are requesting the City of Edina to vacate 5 feet of a 10 foot drainage easement, which runs down the westerly side of our lot. The 5 feet we are requesting would allow us to construct a double attached garage to our home. We are asking for only one half of the the existing drainage easement to be vacated, which would allow us to accomplish our building project and leave a substantial drainage easement for the City of Edina. Our home currently has a very bad situation with the driveway at a severe downward slope to a tuckunder garage. For many years there has been serious water related problems including constant flooding of the garage due to spring melting, and heavy rains. In the winter ice build up, and snow gifts make the use of our garage extremely difficult. There currently exist a culvert drainage system which runs from the street directly under the current driveway and house, and expels water on ground level in the backyard of our home. This culvert system has not alleviated any of the problem. By allowing this vacation we could move forward with our building plan of a street grade double attached garage. This would eliminate the deluge of water and ice on the driveway and into the garage. Our analysis of the water run off situation is that by raising the grade of our driveway we would solve our problem by containing the street runoff by the new driveway apron which will have an elevation sufficient enough to direct the water down the Street. Any excess water runoff effecting our house and or the neighbors house would be handled by a natural surface drainage passageway between the houses created by landscaping. As to the existing culvert, we would suggest the total removal of the system, that has been proven not to work. In conversation with the city engineer we have discussed putting in a new drainage system. Should this be necessary it could be relocated on the remaining easement and done simultaneously with our building project. We feel there is no need for a new culvert system. The drainage problems would be solved by our building plan. Therefore we are requesting the vacation of 5 feet of the city's easement. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, AGENDA ITEM X.A 0 EDINA MORNINGSIDE ROTARY CLUB 12 July 1994 Mr. Ken Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Food license for Edina Morningside Rotary Dear Ken: This is just a note to ask your assistance in waiving the Food License required by the city. Last Fall our Rotary Club was approached Karen Knutson of the 50th and France Merchant's Association to support three events hosted by this group: Spring Fling, Edina Art Fair, and Crazy Days. We purchased a refrigerator and built a food tent to the Health Department specifications. The Merchant's Association wanted concessions sold at all three affairs. The club thought it might be a positive way to support the community as all "profits" are turned back through are ongoing local projects. As a matter of fact; we promote the Edina Chemical Awareness program during the art fair by distributing literature for the ECA organization. However, the "profits" have not quite exceeded the projections. The Spring Fling was a break even project and the three day Edina Art Fair generated $500.00 - we had 37 Edina residents as volunteers for this event. Our Board of Directors is looking at these projects and wondering if it is even worth our effort. I believe that they give our club and ECA great exposure and I want to continue supporting these events. Is it possible for our club to purchase just one food license per season? We have already spent $140.00 on licenses for the first two events and now we will be required to purchase yet a third license for Crazy Days. Ken, I would appreciate your looking in to this matter and seeing if you can help us out. Thanks in advance for your help. erely, Bruce Bahneman P.O. Box 24742 Edina, Minnesota 55424 P TA ,p NATO EDINA MORNINGSIDE ROTARY CLUB EDINA MORNINGSIDE ROTARY July 12, 1994 Ongoing projects in Edina 1. Edina Chemical Awareness: $6,000.00 donation 2. Edina Junior Police program for all third grade students: $1,900.00 donation 3. Student scholarships for Edina High School Seniors: $1,000.00 donation 4. ABC ( A Better Chance): $500.00 donation 5. Camp Enterprise scholarships and tuition for three Edina High Seniors: $1,400.00 donation 6. Student Leadership Conference for two Edina High School Sophomores: $400.00 donation 7. Edina Senior Citizen Smoke Detector Program: $900.00 donation P.O. Box 24742 Edina, Minnesota 55424 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # XI.A. FROM: JOHN WALLIN Consent El Information Only ❑ DATE: JULY 18, 1994 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: © To Council RESPONSE TO AUDITOR'S Action ❑ Motion MANAGEMENT LETTER ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info/Background: Attached are: 1. Auditor's Management Letter 2. Finance Director's Response 3. Independent Auditor's Report on Legal Compliance KPPeat Marwick 4200 Norwest Center Telephone 612 341 2222 Telefax 612 341 0202 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 April 22, 1994 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota: We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 1993, and have issued our report thereon dated April 22, 1994. In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City, we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. We have not considered the internal control structure since the date of our report. During our audit we noted certain matters involving the internal control structure and other operational matters that are presented for your consideration. These comments and recommendations, all of which have been discussed with the appropriate members of management, are intended to improve the internal control structure or result in other operating efficiencies and are presented in the attached exhibit. It should be noted that this letter, by its nature, is critical in that it contains only our comments and recommendations on deficiencies. It does not include our observations on the many strong features of the City's operations. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, management and others within the City of Edina. Member Firm of Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Exhibit CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Comments and Recommendations COMPLIANCE WITH SINGLE AUDIT REQUIREMENTS All grantees receiving federal funds must certify that they will provide a drug -free workplace. This single audit requirement includes development, approval, publication, and institution of a drug -free workplace policy. Noncompliance with single audit requirements may put the City at risk of losing future federal funding. We recognize that the City currently has an approved drug -free workplace policy, but has not yet communicated this policy to its employees. Therefore, we recommend that the City publish and implement their drug -free workplace policy in 1994. APPROPRIATENESS OF ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS During the course of the audit, it was noted that the City's recording of certain transactions is not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The following items were noted: • The City is currently recording the liability for construction work performed through year end, but not paid, as an accounts payable. We recommend that the City reclassify the liability to contracts payable for appropriate presentation in the financial statements. • The City is currently recording receipts for donations and funds held in trust for others as a liability in the General Fund. Donations should be recorded as revenue when received. Funds held in trust for others should be recorded as an asset and a liability in an Agency Fund. CHANGE ORDERS FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS During the course of the audit, it was noted that a change order for an HRA contract, which was greater than 10% of the original contract amount, was not approved by the City Council. Currently, the 10% guideline is only applicable to projects which are overseen by the Engineering Department. Approval of change orders helps to maintain the fiscal and operational integrity of construction projects. We recommend that all change order requests (inclusive of HRA, Parks & Recreation, and Engineering projects), which are greater than 10% of the original contract amount be approved by the City Council before implementation. UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM During the course of the audit, recurring errors were noted in the utility billing system. These errors were related to incorrect meter readings, inaccurate data entry of readings for billing purposes, and inappropriate estimated billings. In general, these errors caused unadjusted utility revenue and customer billing statements to be misstated. This resulted in an increase in the manual accounting changes which were necessary to properly record utility revenue, in addition to an increase in customer service time spent dealing with billing statement questions. We understand that the City is planning to implement a new utility billing system in 1994, and recommend that stronger controls in these areas be included in the new system to reduce these types of errors. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: John Wallin, Finance Director DATE: July 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Response to Auditor's Letter As with any accounting system, there is always improvements that can be made. In response to this year's auditor's comments, the following procedures and directions are being taken: COMPLIANCE WITH SINGLE AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The City currently has Policies and Procedures on Drug and Alcohol Use and Testing. The publication and institution of the policy will be done shortly. APPROPRIATENESS OF ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS Construction liabilities will be reported as contracts and not accounts payable for next year's audit. These are actually recorded in the Revolving Fund and not the General Fund. They are donations earmarked for specific purchases such as park benches and other park equipment and donated funds to purchase fire equipment by the Masonic Lodge. Revenues and expenditures are closed into fund balance at the end of each year. Since some of the donations received in one year may not be expended until the next year these mini projects were set up as an asset /liability in the Revolving Fund to account for each until the funds were spent. We hope to utilize, with the new LOGIS financial system, a job ledger which will be able to track these projects and record them as the auditors recommended. CHANGE ORDERS FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS The City has a policy which states that if a change order for a contract that the City Council has approved exceeds 10% of the original contract,that the Council must approve the change order. The policy is part of the purchasing policies approved by the City Council and is being followed by all the departments. In all of their tests the auditors only reference one exception to the policy which was on an HRA contract. The policy has been and will continue to be followed by all departments within the City. J UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM The current utility billing system is one of the original LOGIS programs and is over twenty years old. The system is expected to do more than it is capable and some problems occur which need to be manually adjusted. The system of meter reading into books and data entering from the book requires two manual functions for the entry of about 5,000 accounts per month. Errors are more possible the more manual functions are performed. The City will be converting to a new LOGIS utility billing system hopefully within the next year. The new system will do a better job of tracking the complexities of the utility billing process. we are also currently investigating hand -held readers which would reduce the errors in the field and radio -read readers which would eliminate the manual process of reading. Both systems would load the information directly into the computer. � � 1 Peat Marwick Certified Public Accountants 4200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Independent Auditors' Report on Legal Compliance Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota: We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1993, and have issued our report thereon dated April 22, 1994. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government, promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statute §6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government covers five main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements. Our study included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested the City complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions. Further, for the items not tested, based on our audit and the procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City had not complied with such legal provisions. This report is intended solely for the use of the City and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record. April 22, 1994 �F Member Firm of Kivm,oih Pont Mnrivick roorri- r COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $1,544.96 AAA LICENSES & PERMITS 070894 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 07/18/94 $45.00 AAA LICENSES & PERMITS 070594 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 147314 $1,589.96* 07/18/94 $43.00 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 7941425 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/94 $43.00 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 7941423 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/94 $43.00 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 7941424 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA 147315 $129.00* 07/18/94 $246.22 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 9405834 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 147316 $246.22* 07/18/94 $124.61 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 25567 -00 SEWER CLEANING GENERAL SUPPLI 147317 $124.61* 07/18/94 $12.95 ACTION MESSENGER MESSENGER SERVICE 139498 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 147318 $12.95* 07/18/94 $154.50 AGGRESSIVE INDUSTRIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 022089 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 147319 $154.50* 07/18/94 $329.26 AIM ELECTRONICS SCOREBOARD REPAIRS 12629 ATHLETIC ACTIV PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $360.66 AIM ELECTRONICS SCOREBOARD REPAIR 12671 ATHLETIC ACTIV PROF SERVICES 147320 $689.92* 07/18/94 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 FINANCE EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $10.00 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 PW BUILDING CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $176.44 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $5.00 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $30.00 AIRSIGNAL AIR TIME 9537471 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 147321 $231.44* 07/18/94 $787.92 AL'S LANDSCAPING & NUR SOD GRASS 063094 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 147322 $787.92* 07/18/94 $74.23 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 22255689 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 147323 $74.23* 07/18/94 $100.95 ALL FIRE TEST INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 001778 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 07/18/94 $12.00 ALL FIRE TEST INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 001778 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 147324 $112.95* 07/18/94 $51.12 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 21574 POOL TRACK GRE PRINTING 147325 $51.12* 07/18/94 $351.45 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 22581 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 - $45.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 21690 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $52.19 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 22590 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $148.04 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 19646 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 2 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -PO -NUM_ - - - - -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -- ----------------------------- 147326 $506.68* 07/18/94 $26.32 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $135.77 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 GRILL LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $158.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $41.83 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $102.06 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $148.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $32.97 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $153.95 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 063094 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 147327 $799.92* 07/18/94 $99.86 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 001421 50TH ST OCCUPA EQUIP MAINT 147328 $99.86* 07/18/94 $56.86 APOLLO PIPING SUPPLY I GENERAL SUPPLIES 0060407 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 147329 $56.86* 07/18/94 $40.00 ARENSON, STEVE REFUND SWIMMING 070594 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147330 $40.00* 07/18/94 $42,318.09 ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO I CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92 -IOFIN GC CIP CIP 147331 $42,318.09* 07/18/94 $37.57 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS T8517 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147332 $37.57* 07/18/94 $44.10 AT T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 52126831 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $28.89 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 52125313 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 147333 $72.99* 07/18/94 $19.01 AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS TELEPHONE 070294 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $14.62 AT &T CONSUMER PRODUCTS TELEPHONE 062694 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 147334 $33.63* 07/18/94 $28.24 AT &T TELEPHONE 061894 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 147335 $28.24* 07/18/94 $13.77 AT &T TELEPHONE 061894 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 147336 $13.77* 07/18/94 $109.39 AU BON PAIN INC COUNCIL DINNER MEETI 62994036 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS 147337 $109.39* 07/18/94 $102.66 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 28490 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $25.08 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 28169 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $137.91 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CA GENERAL SUPPLIES 062994 NORMANDALE GC 147338 $265.65* 07/18/94 $35.00 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 24352 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS a i COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147339 $35.00* 07/18/94 $311.30 AVR INC CONCRETE 12123 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 07/18/94 $283.00 AVR INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 12253 TODD PARK GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $228.10 AVR INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10617 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $282.70 AVR INC CONCRETE 11550 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 07/18/94 $268.90 AVR INC CONCRETE 10928 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 07/18/94 $268.90 AVR INC CONCRETE 10488 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 147340 $1,642.90* 07/18/94 $469.75 BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLE TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 67227 CENTENNIAL LAK TREES FLWR SHR 147341 $469.75* 07/18/94 $14.66 BAKER POOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 37834 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 147342 $14.66* 07/18/94 $80.00 BALDINGER, WENDY SERVICES CL /EB 051994 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 147343 $80.00* 07/18/94 $285.00 BARR ENGINEERING COMPA PROF ENG SERVICES 2327354- GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES 147344 $285.00* 07/18/94 $1,775.00 BARRY SIEWERT CREATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 071094 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 147345 $1,775.00* 07/18/94 $82.13 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 314621 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $122.96 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 320627 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $34.03 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 319171 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $45.74 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 312109 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $27.29 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 314065 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147346 $312.15* 07/18/94 $100.00 BENNETT, WAYNE POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147347 $100.00* 07/18/94 $7.61 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1506161 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $12.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1528011 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $8.09 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1528011 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $45.45 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1543010 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $25.09 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 1514770 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 07/18/94 $98.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1528010 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 147348 $196.76* 07/18/94 $50.28 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS O GENERAL SUPPLIES 4267. RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $7.68 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS O GENERAL SUPPLIES 5305. GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $6.39 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS O REPAIR PARTS 5317 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 147349 $64.35* 07/18/94 $118.00 BEST MAID COOKIE COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 009394 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 147350 $118.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 4 CHECK NO ----------------------------------.------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE ---------------------------------- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 07/18/94 $48.64 BFI OF MN INC RECYCLING 940600/1 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/94 $5,356.55 BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 940600 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES 147351 $5,405.19* 07/18/94 $39,779.77 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING SERVICE 70000078 RECYCLING EQUIP RENTAL 147352 $39,779.77* 07/18/94 $130.52 BIFFS INC RUBBISH REMOVAL B1028743 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 147353 $130.52* 07/18/94 $250.00 BINGHAM, DORAINE SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147354 $250.00* 07/18/94 $132.45 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 67255 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 147355 $132.45* 07/18/94 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147356 $100.00* 07/18/94 $471.56 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL 01091282 GENERAL MAINT EQUIP RENTAL 147357 $471.56* 07/18/94 $217.20 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM IN COST OF GOODS SOLD F 053194 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $478.50 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM IN COST.OF GOODS SOLD F 062894 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 147358 $695.70* 07/18/94 $40.00 BOLTON; JULIE REFUND /EM WATER SAFE 070594 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147359 $40.00* 07/18/94 $29.95 BOTTOW LINE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 062194 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 147360 $29.95* 07/18/94 $390.56 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MF GENERAL SUPPLIES 379865 CIVIL DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLI 147361 $390.56* 07/18/94 $150.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CONCRETE TESTING -VV 024164 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 147362 $150.00* 07/18/94 $17.00 BRIGGS, BECKY REFUND TENNIS 071194 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147363 $17.00* 07/18/94 $23.17 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 332029 -1 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 147364 $23.17* 07/18/94 $75.00 BROM, BECKY PERFORM CL /EB 051994 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 147365 $75.00* 07/18/94 $96.74 BUIE, BARBARA MILEAGE 070694 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE 147366 $96.74* * COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 5 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 07/18/94 $74.71 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 00106675 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 147367 $74.71* 07/18/94 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147368 $100.00* 07/18/94 $16.72 CADY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 105777 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 147369 $16.72* 07/18/94 $170.80 CALLAHAN, FRAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE JUNE PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE 147370 $170.80* 07/18/94 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071294 FINANCE MILEAGE 147371 $50.00* 07/18/94 $313.86 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 60156 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 147372 $313.86* 07/18/94 $85.61 CDP GENERAL SUPPLIES 1952236 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $109.29 CDP GENERAL SUPPLIES 1947170 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 147373 $194.90* 07/18/94 $50.10 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS 561306 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 147374 $50.10* 07/18/94 $10.92 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 062894 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $17.23 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 062894 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $12.76 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 062894 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $36.86 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062094/P DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $59.33 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 062094 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $267.21 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062894/P SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $72.63 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 062094 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 147375 $476.94* 07/18/94 $228.96 CHEROKEE POWER EQUIPME TOOLS 90856 CENTENNIAL LAK TOOLS 147376 $228.96* 07/18/94 $64.00 CITY BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD B 76875 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 147377 $64.00* 07/18/94 $34,252.50 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SECOND QUARTER 196 PUBLIC HEALTH PROF SERVICES 147378 $34,252.50* 07/18/94 $75.00 CLELAND, BRUCE PERFORM CL /EB 072394 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 147379 $75.00* 07/18/94 $832.67 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 01665222 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $380.10 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 01872590 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $55.80 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 0161980 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - PROGRAM - - -- - - - - OBJECT PO NUM_ -- - -- - -- ------------------------------ 07/18/94 - - - - $196.49 -- -- - -- - - COCA COLA BOTTLING COM - -- - - -- - COST OF GOODS SOLD M 01745586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 147380 $1,465.06* 07/18/94 $387.00 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 459192 CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS 147381 $387.00* 07/18/94 $495.00 COMPUTER CREATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 84980 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 147382 $495.00* 07/18/94 $800.00 CONLON, MARK SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147383 $800.00* 07/18/94 $45.00 CONNOLLY, BOB PERFORM CL /EB 0730 -31 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147384 $45.00* 07/18/94 $107.67 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WATER PROOFING M016028 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 147385 $107.67* 07/18/94 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J MEDICAL SERVICES JULY 199 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 147386 $1,386.67* 07/18/94 $213.00 CRITTER CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 236868 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 147387 $213.00* 07/18/94 $2,100.00 CROSBIE, SCOTT SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147388 $2,100.00* 07/18/94 $20.00 CSC CREDIT SERVICES IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 1615264 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 147389 $20.00* 07/18/94 $78.82 CULLIGAN WATER 063094 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 147390 $78.82* 07/18/94 $45.00 CUTSHALL, CAROL SKATING REFUND 070194 ICE ARENA PROG REGISTRATION F 147391 $45.00* 07/18/94 $263.95 D.C. HEY CO. RENTAL EQUIPMENT 408544 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $31.50 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 4095911 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI 147392 $295.45* 07/18/94 $521.00 D.E. WEITZEL AMBULANCE FEES 070894 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 147393 $521.00* 07/18/94 $500.00 DAHL, TIM SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147394 $500.00* 07/18/94 $50,754.70 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTI CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 94 -3 /PYM STORM SEWER CIP 147395 $50,754.70* 07/18/94 $281.10 DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147396 $281.10* . 07/18/94 $181.59 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 071294 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 147397 $181.59* 07/18/94 $17.00 DEBERG, GLORIA REFUND TENNIS 070694 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147398 $17.00* 07/18/94 $400.00 DELCOL, IDILLIO SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147399 $400.00* 07/18/94 $300.00 DEMUTH, DAN JR GOLF 071194 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 147400 $300.00* 07/18/94 $8.95 DEPENDABLE COURIER COURIER 261657 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 147401 $8.95* 07/18/94 $400.00 DESERT KNIGHT QUARTET SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147402 $400.00* 07/18/94 $2,265.00 DICTAPHONE CORP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ P778732 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI 147403 $2,265.00* 07/18/94 $120.49 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 14261 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 07/18/94 $102.35 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 14835 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 147404 $222.84* 07/18/94 $858.00 DORADUS CORP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 0940717 CIVIL DEFENSE SVC CONTR EQUI 147405 $858.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 DORRIAN, KAREN REFUND SWIMMING 063094 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147406 $40.00* 07/18/94 $301.61 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0740446 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $42.19 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0740447 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 147407 $343.80* 07/18/94 $991.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 070194/G GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $39.75 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 386294 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $916.65 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 386297 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $3,106.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 386294 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $1,838.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 386374 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $3,597.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 304456 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $890.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 382871 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $79.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 384458 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $23.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 382871 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $1,891.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 382870 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 147408 $13,374.30* 07/18/94 $40.00 EATON, LAURA REFUND SWIMMING 070594 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147409 $40.00* 07/18/94 $106.50 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATIO SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 2811829 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI 07/18/94 $90.53 ECOLAB,PEST ELIMINATIO SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 2811834 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 147410 $197.03* 07/18/94 $27.00 EDINA HRA PARKING PERMIT 071294 LIQUOR 50TH ST LIC & PERMITS 147411 $27.00* 07/18/94 $34.59 EDINA LIQUOR STORE OPENING REFRESHMENTS 060294 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 147412 $34.59* 07/18/94 $363.00 EDINA POLICE EXPLORERS 12e BIKE AUCTION 070894 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPER 147413 $363.00* 07/18/94 $565.85 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 46726 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $564.37 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS FILL MATERIALS 46996 DISTRIBUTION FILL MATERIALS 7i7414 $1,130.22* 07/18/94 $133.74 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE INTEL FAX 10732356 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 147415 $133.74* 07/18/94 $700.00 ERICKSON, RICHARD SPLASH- 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147416 $700.00* 07/18/94 $530.02 EVANS LARSON COMMUNICA PROF SERVICES SPLASH00 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 147417 $530.02* 07/18/94 $350.00 EXCELLENCE IN ENTERTAI SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147418 $350.00* 07/18/94 $1,200.00 EXCELLENCE IN ENTERTAI SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147419 $1,200.00* 07/18/94 $29.50 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 5102 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 07/18/94 $55.25 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 5097 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 07/18/94 $568.49 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 5047 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 147420 $653.24* 07/18/94 $20.17 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES C11809 ED,ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 147421 $20.17* 07/18/94 $33.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS POSTAGE -PMS 17231004 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 147422 $33.00* 07/18/94 $428.98 FEED RITE CONTROL CHEMICALS 38555 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 07/18/94 $42.70 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPP 38716 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 07/18/94 $1,807.60 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPP 38718 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 147423 $2,279.28* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul .15 1994 00:07:34 Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $30.00 FINE, AGNES PERFORM CL /EB 072394 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 147424 $30.00* 07/18/94 $360.00 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 9400921 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES 147425 $360.00* 07/18/94 $363,506.25 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -CL 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $303,918.75 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -CL 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $100,000.00 FIRST TRUST BOND PRINCIPAL -GRAND 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $54,212.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST - GRANDV 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $42,435.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 061394 IBR #2 PROG INTEREST BONDS 07/18/94 $103,597.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -50TH 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $24,000.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 061394 IBR #2 PROG INTEREST BONDS 07/18/94 $244,087.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -CL 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $100,000.00 FIRST TRUST BOND PRINCIPAL -EDINB 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $125,825.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -EDINB 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $269,281.25 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST -CL 061394 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 07/18/94 $250,000.00 FIRST TRUST BOND PRINCIPAL 061394 IBR #2 PROG BOND PRINCIPLE 147426 $1,980,863.75* 07/18/94 $1,146.75 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT -EDINB 062794 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM BRA 147427 $1,146.75* 07/18/94 $111.83 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO ALARM SERVICE 153619 ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE 07/18/94 $29.87 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 154029 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 147428 $141.70* 07/18/94 $35.00 FLUGSTAD, LISA CLASS REFUND 071194 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147429 $35.00* 07/18/94 $55.34 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 861850 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $173.86 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 864800 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $142.52 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10852620 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 147430 $371.72* 07/18/94 $75.00 FRANKFURT, AMY SKATING REFUND 070194 ICE ARENA PROG REGISTRATION F 147431 $75.00* 07/18/94 $846.40 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 3386 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 147432 $846.40* 07/18/94 $26.90 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/C CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $491.17 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $417.87 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/P EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $325.10 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 070194/P PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $662.15 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $127.00 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/P ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $840.37 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 070194/P GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 147433 $2,890.56* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT i VENDOR DESCRIPTION --- INVOICE- - - - - -- - -- PROGRAM - -- - OBJECT - -- PO NUM_ - - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ 07/18/94 $1,200.00 1------------------------- G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC ------------- PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 070894 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 147434 $1,200.00* 07/18/94 $640.00 GAGLIARDIE, CELESTE SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147435 $640.00* 07/18/94 $112.50 GARDER,F DOUG AC INSTRUCTOR 071094 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 147436 $112.50* 07/18/94 $210.00 GCSAA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 070194 MAINT OF LOURS DUES & SUBSCRI` 147437 $210.00* 07/18/94 $411.75 GENERAL SPORTS TENNIS UNIFORMS 038686 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $20:00 GENERAL SPORTS POOL UNIFORMS 038690 POOL OPERATION LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $64.20 GENERAL SPORTS WATER RESCUE BAG 038704 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 147438 $495.95* 07/18/94 $350.64 GEREBI, LIZ SERVICES EDINBOROUGH 071294 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 147439 $350.64* 07/18/94 $54.00 GETTMAN COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 21040 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 147440 $54.00* 07/18/94 $47.39 GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR PARTS 940996 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 147441 $47.39* 07/18/94 $307.83 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49863362 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $56.45 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49863712 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $25.42 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49863605 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $127.13 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49525485 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $144.59 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49526494 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $131.52 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49863802 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 - $28.95 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49863362 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $311.87 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49525673 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $311.87 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49863413 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $206.53 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49525456 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 147442 $1,594.26* 07/18/94 $157.99' GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 50062372 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $287.56 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10492401 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 147443 $445.55* 07/18/94 $694.70 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER FIX LAWN IRRIGATION 7407321 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 147444 $694.70* 07/18/94 $15,812.00 GREUPNER, JOE GOLF LESSONS 071294 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF 147445 $15,812.00* 07/18/94 $18,767.44 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSPITALIZATION 2505565 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 147446 $18,767.44* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 11 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 07/18/94 $125.58 H.L. MOORE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7737510 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 147447 $125.58* 07/18/94 $54.00 HAGEN, KATHRYN REFUND TENNIS 062994 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147448 $54.00* 07/18/94 $500.00 HALLONQUIST, LOREN SPALSH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147449 $500.00* 07/18/94 $30.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES CL /EB 072394 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147450 $30.00* 07/18/94 $225.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES CL /EB 0730 -31 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147451 $225.00* 07/18/94 $27.00 HAYHOE, BARBARA REFUND TENNIS 070694 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147452 $27.00* 07/18/94 $350.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA SERVICES /PLAYGROUND 071294 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI 147453 $350.00* 07/18/94 $281.61 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 147454 $281.61* 07/18/94 $800.00 HEPOLA, RALPH SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147455 $800.00* 07/18/94 $67.00 HOCH, MARILEE REFUND SWIMMING 070694 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147456 $67.00* 07/18/94 $100.00 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147457 $100.00* 07/1.8/94 $39.65 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 23789 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 147458 $39.65* 07/18/94 $152.54 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071194 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 147459 $152.54* 07/18/94 $152.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIR PARTS 062094 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147460 $152.50* 07/18/94 $457.13 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER METE 7170 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 07/18/94 $2,390.34 HYDRO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY WATER METE 7164 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 147461 $2,847.47* 07/18/94 $463.00 IDENTIFICATION SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 0098403 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 147462 $463.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION. INVOICE - -- PROGRAM --------------- OBJECT - -- -- PO NUM_ 07/18/94 $46.07 -'------------------------------------------------ J & W INSTRUMENTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 76053 DISTRIBUTION OFFICE SUPPLIE 147463 $46.07* 07/18/94 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147464 $100.00* 07/18/94 $1,053.50 JAMIESON AND ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 94585 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF. SERVICES 147465 $1,053.50* 07/18/94 $349.67 JERRYS FOODS COST OF GENERAL GOODS SOLD F SUPPLIES 070794 070794 GRILL ART CENTER ADM CST OF GD GENERAL FOOD SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $54.78 $17.72 JERRYS FOODS JERRYS FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 070794 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $99.43 JERRYS FOODS CRAFT SUPPLIES 070794 070794 ART CENTER ADM ART SUPPLY GIF CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $122.72 $77.90 JERRYS FOODS JERRYS FOODS GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 070794 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI 071894 $6.26 JERRYS FOODS MEETING GENERAL EXPENSE SUPPLIES 070794 070794 FIRE DE. GEN SPECIALPACTIVI MEETING GENERAL EXPENS SUPPLI 07/18/94 $20.16 JERRYS FOODS 147466 $748.64* 07/18/94 $277.54 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 062594 BUILDING MAINT PARK MAINTENAN GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $4.73 $172.06 JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 062594 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $48.71 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 07/18/94 $10.68 JERRYS: HARDWARE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 062594 062594 ED BUILDING & POOL OPERATION GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $20.54 $297.81 JERRYS,HARDWARE JERRYS;HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 062594 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 07/18/94 $42.58 JERRYS:HARDWARE JERRYS;HARDWARE TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 062594 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL MAINT TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $53.14 $23.85 JERRYS'- HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $197.24 JERRYSL..HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 062594 GOLF ADMINISTR NORMAN. MAINT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $118.79 $33.69 JERRYS?HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 062594 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $106.97 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 062594 062594 FIRE DEPT. GEN POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $2.49 $4.66 JERRYS - HARDWARE JERRYS'HARDWARE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 062594 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 147468 $1,415.48* 07/18/94 $158.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES E1362 E1451 ART CENTER ADM ATHLETIC ACTIV PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $92.13 JERRYS PRINTING 147469 $250.13* 07/18/94 $213.05 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 3675 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 147470 $213.05* 07/18/94 $1,350.00 JIMMY ALLEN ARTIST MAN SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147471 $1,350.00* 07/18/94 $600.00 JOHNSON, KEITH SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147472 $600.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -----------------------------------------'---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $17.63 JOHNSON, NAOMI OFFICE SUPPLIES 071094 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 07/18/94 $38.95 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 071094 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $116.67 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 071094 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 147473 $173.25* 07/18/94 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147474 $100.00* 07/18/94 $196.86 JONES, JENNIFER SERVICES EDINBOROUGH 071294 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 147475 $196.86* 07/18/94 $93.24 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 070194/N NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD .07/18/94 $312.25 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 063094 CLUB HOUSE CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $767.65 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 063094 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $560.42 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 063094 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $945.56 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $4,420.92 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 CLUB HOUSE CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $55.60 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 063094 NORMANDALE GC CLEANING SUPPL 147476 $7,155.64* 07/18/94 $89.66 K & K SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES 80124 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 147477 $89.66* 07/18/94 $1,300.00 K.I.T.T. INT PRO SERVICES ART CEN 071094 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 147478 $1,300.00* 07/18/94 $1,840.55 K.L. TANNEHILL INC WIRING FOR PRE -EMPTI 95072 PRE- EMPTION EQUIP REPLACEM 147479 $1,840.55* 07/18/94 $14.81 KATTREH, ANN CLEANING SUPPLIES 071194 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $57.86 KATTREH, ANN GENERAL SUPPLIES 071194 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $79.46 KATTREH, ANN GENERAL SUPPLIES 071194 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $8.00 KATTREH, ANN TOOLS 071194 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 07/18/94 $12.27 KATTREH, ANN OFFICE SUPPLIES 071194 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 07/18/94 $29.00 KATTREH, ANN POSTAGE 071194 ED ADMINISTRAT POSTAGE 07/18/94 $17.46 KATTREH, ANN REPAIR PARTS 071194 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $36.03 KATTREH, ANN, TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 071194 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 147480 $254.89* 07/18/94 $153.99 KATTREH, ANN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 0711 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE 147481 $153.99* 07/18/94 $151.07 KEPRIOS, JOHN GENERAL SUPPLIES 070594 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 147482 $151.07* 07/18/94 $7.10 KNOX COMM CREDIT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 107711 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $53.04 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 109878 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 07/18/94 $23.42 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 109097 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $314.90 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 034457 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $57.39 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 108369 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT- - - - - -- PO -NUM_ ------------------------------------------;---------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $140.26 KNOX COMM CREDIT GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 107760 BRIDGES GUARD GUARD RAIL MAT 07/18/94 $45.75 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 108670 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 147483 $641.86* 07/18/94 $70.00 KNOX, JANET CLASS REFUND 062994 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147484 $70.00* 07/18/94 $318.86 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNM REPAIR PARTS 54436 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 - $239.30 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNM REPAIR PARTS 53461 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147485 $79.56* 07/18/94 $710.10 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 109533 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $456.90 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 109813 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $867.30 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 109367 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $1,073.30 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 109259 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 147486 $3,107.60* 07/18/94 $125.00 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER CONT ED /FIRE 070894 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 147487 $125.00* 07/18/94 $377.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC POND TREATMENT 3087 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $796.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC POND WEED TREATMENT 1673 PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 147488 $1,173.00* 07/18/94 $59.16 LANCRETE, LAURA MILEAGE JUNE 199 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 147489 $59.16* 07/18/94 $429.76 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1073185 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $332.60 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1072475 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $81.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1073186 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $220.03 LAWSON PRODUCTS ACCESSORIES 1065416 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 07/18/94 $372.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1070240 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $344.59 LAWSON ;PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1073189 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $368.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1073191 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 147490 $2,148.37* 07/18/94 $39.90. LEE BOOKS BOOKS 381 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL 147491 $39.90* 07/18/94 $76.08 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 063094/A ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY 07/18/94 $25.87 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 063094 MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY 147492 $101.95* 07/18/94 $994.46 LEITNER COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 142304 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 147493 $994.46* 07/18/94 $27.54 LIMBECK, MARC CONT ED /POLICE 070794 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 147494 $27.54* 07/18/94 $75.00 LUTTGEN, JOY LOST CHECK /EB /CL 062994 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION POLICE DEPT. G INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147495 00006742 $75.00* SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL $612.00* 07/18/94 $77.21 LYNDALE HARDWARE CONTRACTED REPAIRS MCC /MIDWEST 0077995 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS SUPPLY GIF 07/18/94 $.95 LYNDALE HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 92542 00070391 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 147496 $56.99 $78.16* GENERAL SUPPLIES 92569 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $304.45 MCC /MIDWEST 07/18/94 $150.39 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30066 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 92760 07/18/94 $417.75 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30110 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX _ 07/18/94 $293.50 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30071 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $350.91 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 29831 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $367.62 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 29932 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $167.10 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 29902 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 147497 $1,747.27* 07/18/94 $75.00 M.I.A.M.A. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 060594 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 147498 $75.00* 07/18/94 $120.00 MACHOLDA,ED GENERAL SUPPLIES 070594 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 147499 $120.00* 147501 147502 147503 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 $762.00 $332.90 $1,678.50 $12.40 $3,692.95 $143.75 -$3.00 $405.60 $13.25 $64.00 $35.30 $32.55 $13.60 $838.90 $2,255.95 $1,807.90 $43.85 $95.40 $12,225.80* MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 063094/G GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 063094/G GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 267344 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 467343 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 267347 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 267348 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 264478. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 269684 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 267345 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 271384 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 271386 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 271381 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 271383 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 271382 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 271385 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 271450 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 271449 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 063094 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $306.00 MARTIN - MCALLISTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 6741 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $306.00 MARTIN- MCALLISTER PRE = EMPLOYMENT SCREE 00006742 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL $612.00* 07/18/94 $253.95 MCC /MIDWEST COST OF GOODS SOLD 92261 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $96.45 MCC /MIDWEST CRAFT SUPPLIES 92542 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 07/18/94 $56.99 MCC /MIDWEST GENERAL SUPPLIES 92569 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $304.45 MCC /MIDWEST COST OF GOODS SOLD 92542 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $38.00 MCC /MIDWEST GENERAL SUPPLIES 92760 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI $749.84* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 16 CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - INVOICE PROGRAM DEJECT - PO NUM_ 07/18/94 $616.64 MCCAREN DESIGN TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 11128 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 147504 $616.64* 07/18/94 $130.65 MCCARTHY, LOWELL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071194 WEED MOWING MILEAGE 147505 $130.65* 07/18/94 $33.24 MCGILL, DAVID SUPPLIES /POOL 070894 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI 147506 $33.24* 07/18/94 $40.43 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 070194/G MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $140.51 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 070194/P DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $3,631.49 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 070194/P 070194/P EQUIPMENT OPER PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $246.18 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 070194P EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL 07/18/94 $486.20 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY ACCESSORIESPLIES 070194/P EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIESPLI 147507 $4,592.50* 07/18/94 $37.70 MECO REPAIR PARTS 63685 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147508 $37.70* 07/18/94 $100.00 MERFELD., BURT POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147509 $100.00* 07/18/94 $78.49 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 36419 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $358.58 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 36453 36473 PW BUILDING ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 07/18/94 $392.87 $485.40 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 36459 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $255.60 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 36368 PUMP & LIFT ST.GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $249.21 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 36420 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 147510 $1,820.15* 07/18/94 $34.00 MESSINGER, ALIDA CLASS REFUND 071194 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147511 $34.00* 07/18/94 $296.66 METROPOLITAN AREA PROM CHAMBER DIRECTORY 4595 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 07/18/94 $296.67 METROPOLITAN AREA PROM CHAMBER DIRECTORY 4595 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 07/18/94 $296.67 METROPOLITAN AREA PROM CHAMBER DIRECTORY 4595 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 147512 $890.00* 07/18/94 $177.18 METROQUIP INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 103096 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 147513 $177.18* 07/18/94 $5,251.98 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 15837 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $145.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 15837 15837 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP BLACKTOP 07/18/94 07/18/94 $408.21 $118.77 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP BLACKTOP 16014 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 07/18/94 $104.72 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 16014 16014 TODD PARK STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI BLACKTOP 07/18/94 07/18/94 $2,448.09 $230.09 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 15672 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $235.39 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 15672 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 07/18/94 $1,729.66 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 15672 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 147514 $10,672.85* 07/18/94 $39,232.79 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPOR CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 94 -4 /PMY STREET IMPROVE CIP 07/18/94 $139,214.80 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPOR CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 94 -2PYMT ST. IMPROV BA CIP 147515 $178,447.59* 07/18/94 $109.40 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPL TRASH BAGS 10745 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 147516 $109.40* 07/18/94 $134.40 MIDWEST VENDING WHOLES COST OF GOODS SOLD F 070194 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $273.60 MIDWEST VENDING WHOLES COST OF GOODS SOLD F 071294 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 147517 $408.00* 07/18/94 $727.00 MILE AWAY ACRES SPLASH 071194 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147518 $727.00* 07/18/94 $1,231.08 MILLIPORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1112364 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 147519 $1,231.08* 07/18/94 $459.98 MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 30343007 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 147520 $459.98* 07/18/94 $852.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30216 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 147521 $852.50* 07/18/94 $350.00 MINNEAPOLIS AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 04089033 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147522 $350.00* 07/18/94 $2,187.30 MINNEGASCO HEAT 062394 POOL OPERATION HEAT 147523 $2,187.30* 07/18/94 $187.97 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 154355 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $207.52 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 154354 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $33.60 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD B 154353 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 -$3.90 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 153988 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $67.00 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 154739 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 147524 $492.19* 07/18/94 $594.20 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 GASOLINE JUNE 199 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 147525 $594.20* 07/18/94 $65.00 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 060396 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 147526 $65.00* 07/18/94 $400.00 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIA COMPUTERIZED HANDICA 060394 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 07/18/94 $3,890.00 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIA COMPUTERIZED HANDICA 0603 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 147527 $4,290.00* Page 18 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM --------------------------- PO -NUM_ _________ 07/18/94 $631.33 --------------------------------- MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP PLASTIC PIPE 14454 GENERAL STORM PIPE 147528 $631.33* 07/18/94 $67.65 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT HRG ALLEY VACATION 12772 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 147529 $67.65* 07/18/94 $298.66 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 433844 CENTENNIAL LAK OF COURS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $213.67 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 432744 MAINT 147530 $512.33* 07/18/94 $10.27 MINNESOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 22466 22368 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $26.63 MINNESOTA WANNER GENERAL SUPPLIES 147531 $36.90* 07/18/94 $148.04 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL DATA PROCESSING 1324115 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 147532 $148.04* 07/18/94 $875.54 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVEN MN CARE TAX 2ND QTR 071294 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 147533 $875.54* 07/18/94 $112.50 MORSTEAD, LEAH SERVICES EDINBOROUGH 071294 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 147534 $112.50* 07/18/94 $484.58 MUNICIL`ITE CO ACCESSORIES 5691 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 147535 $484.58* 07/18/94 $800.00 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCI CAMEO TRG REGISTRATI I8924010 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 147536 $800.00* 07/18/94 $126.21 NEBCO E, VANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F 295651 063094 CENTENNIAL LAK POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $866.11 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F GENERAL SUPPLIES 291080 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $44.54 NEBCO EVANS 147537 $1,036.86* 07/18/94 $75.00 NICKEL,, KATHRYN CLASS REFUND 062994 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147538 $75.00* 07/18/94 $39.00 NIEBUHR, EMILY CLASS REFUND 070694 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147539 $39.00* 07/18/94 $100.00 NISSEN„ DICK POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147540 $100.00* 07/18/94 $31.20 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 085957 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 147541 $31.20* 07/18/94 $340.65 NORTHEAST METRO INTERM CONT ED /FIRE 15032 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 147542 $340.65* 07/18/94 $67.90 NORTHEAST PUBLISHING G DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMI2742 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 ;00:07:34 Page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -----------------------------------------`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147543 $67.90* 147544 147545 147546 147547 147548 147549 07/18/94 $43.60 NORTHERN AIRGAS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 63280 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST.AID SUPP POWER $43.60* FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT 07/18/94 $415.80 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS REPAIR PARTS POWER 42588459 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS PW BUILDING $415.80* & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $37.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 17766 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $74.40 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 17260 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $54.00 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 18379 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $92.88 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 15973 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $202.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 13519 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $115.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 15971 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $46.50 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 15330 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $73.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 14849 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX $696.18* 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 07/18/94 $144.31 $79.50 $61.95 $285.76* $107.50 $340.46 $447.96* $25.00 $25.00* $1,891.15 $656.49 $42.71 $2,527.68 $2,623.29 $607.78 $647.95 $10,033.95 $129.93 $3,534.26 $431.08 $1,951.75 $62.24 $13,461.90 $239.06 $2,479.04 $29,151.69 $1,606.63 $1,188.02 $58.48 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP CRAFT SUPPLIES NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NPPTA NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 220178 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 220178 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 222449 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD NW11876 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES NW11377 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 063094 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCRI LIGHT & POWER 071894 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 GUN RANGE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 071894 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT - -- - PO NUM_ - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07- /18/94 $39.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $8,615.13 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $59.11 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $4,022.16 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $155.78 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $7.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 GENERAL STORM. LIGHT & POWER 07/18/94 $101.07 NSP LIGHT & POWER 071894 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 147551 $86,325.75* 07/18/94 $206.00 OLD DUTCH FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 070194 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 147552 $206.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 OLSON, CYNTHIA REFUND SWIMMING 063094 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147553 $40.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 OLSON, CYNTHIA REFUND SWIMMING 070594 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147554 $40.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 OLSON, GAYLE REFUND SWIMMING 070794 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147555 $40.00* 07/18/94 $92.00 OLYMPIC POOLS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3269 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 147556 $92.00* 07/18/94 $2,552.50 ORVIS, JOAN SERVICES ARENA 070194 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC OTHER 147557 $2,552.50* 07/18/94 $148.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 998049 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 147558 $148.00* 07/18/94 $174.75 OWENS SERVICE CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 84572 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $212.00 OWENS SERVICE CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 84566 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 147559 $386.75* 07/18/94 $32.12 PAPERDIRECT INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 65120740 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 147560 $32.12* 07/18/94 $380.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41895 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $211.90 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41896 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $62.92 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41179 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $64.90 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42073 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $73.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42072 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147561 $793.22* 07/18/94 $74.10 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 30682518 CENTENNIAL LAK CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $125.80 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30796110 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $204.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CREDIT TAKEN TWICE /P 071294 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $505.80 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094/N NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $356.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $1,893.45 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094/G GRILL CST OF GD FOOD COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/94 $71.60 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 29196308 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $77.35 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 29196307 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 147562 $3,308.10* 07/18/94 $8,790.70 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONT GRADING &•SODDING 060994 GC CIP CIP 07/18/94 $932.50 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 0610 GC CIP CIP 147563 $9,723.20* 07/18/94 $36.66 PHEBE HAUGEN - GAFFNEY REFUND SWIMMING 070694 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147564 $36.66* 07/18/94 $488.00 PHYSIO CONTROL LIFEPAK MAINT AGREEM D49665 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 147565 $488.00* 07/18/94 $24.00 PILLING, JUDY CLASS REFUND 071194 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147566 $24.00* 07/18/94 $115.55 PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH GENERAL SUPPLIES 3086 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 147567 $115.55* 07/18/94 $350.00 PLATTES, JIM FIDDLE FE SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147568 $350.00* 07/18/94 $34.08 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 743059 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 147569 $34.08* 07/18/94 $892.05 POMMER CO PLAQUE 036011 WORK. CAP. PRO ACCTS REC MISC 147570 $892.05* 07/18/94 $225.00 POSTMASTER MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 062994 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 147571 $225.00* 07/18/94 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 071294 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 147572 $5,000.00* 07/18/94 $150.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /ART CENTER 071294 ART CENTER ADM POSTAGE 147573 $150.00* 07/18/94 $77.88 PRECISION TURF /CHEM CHEMICALS 04778 MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS 147574 $77.88* 07/18/94 $3,038.09 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 063094 STREET RENOVAT SAND,GRVL & RO 147575 $3,038.09* 07/18/94 $470.00 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING PROF ENG SERVICES 93022.08 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 147576 $470.00* 07/18/94 $240.09 QUALITY REFRIGERATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 093459 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 147577 $240.09* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 07/18/94 $113.92 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC GENERAL SUPPLIES 122696 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 147578 $113.92* 07/18/94 $34.00 RAGALLER, BETTY CLASS REFUND 062994 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147579 $34.00* 07/18/94 $92.91 RECREONICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 047898 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 147580 $92.91* 07/18/94 $108.80 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 00411 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $446.25 RED WING SHOES SAFETY_ EQUIPMENT 00411 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 147581 $555.05* 07/18/94 $342.14 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 4193 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 147582 $342.14* 07/18/94 $2,130.55 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 95723 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $1,820.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 95724 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $2,677.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 95725 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $18.45 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD M 95725 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/94 $1,559.80 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 94771 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $1,376.65 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 94772 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $2,516.70 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 94769 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 147583 $12,099.45* 07/18/94 $318.35 RICHFIELD PLUMBING CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5709 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 147584 $318.35* 07/18/94 $300.00 1 RIEKENA; JOE JR GOLF 071194 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 147585 $300.00* 07/18/94 $106.85 RINGS &THINGS CRAFT SUPPLIES 004063 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 147586 $106.85* 07/18/94 $33.02 ROBERT B. HILL SALT 43896 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 147587 $33.02* 07/18/94 $1,000.00 ROCKING,SSS FARMS SPLASH 071194 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147588 $1,000.00* 07/18/94 $1,097.97 ROLLINS'OIL CO GASOLINE 29059 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 147589 $1,097.97* 07/18/94 $1,600.00 ROOF SPEC INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 4628 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 147590 $1,600.00* 07/18/94 $400.00 ROWAN, BRUCE & SHARON SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147591 $400.00* 07/18/94 $600.00 RUDOLPH, MIKAEL SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147592 $600.00* 07/18/94 $473.78 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ C REPAIR PARTS 77124 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147593 $473.78* 07/18/94 $50.00 RUNNING, PATRICK GENERAL SUPPLIES FIR 070194 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 147594 $50.00* 07/18/94 $300.00 SANCHELLI, NANCY SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147595 $300.00* 07/18/94 $122.63 SCHAFER EQUIP CO TOOLS 172390 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 147596 $122.63* 07/18/94 $300.00 SCHEU, STEPHANIE SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147597 $300.00* 07/18/94 $11.00 SCHMITZ, TOM LICENSES & PERMITS 070194 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIC & PERMITS 147598 $11.00* 07/18/94 $800.00 SCHOEN, CLETUS SPLASH 073094 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147599 $800.00* 07/18/94 $724.74 SCHUMANN'S BAKERY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 063094 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 147600 $724.74* 07/18/94 $289.80 SCOTT COUNTY NURSERY I MULCH 070194 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 147601 $289.80* 07/18/94 $120.00 SEIDEL, ROXANNE SERVICES CL /EB 071194 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 147602 $120.00* 07/18/94 $2,450.94 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF SEWER RODS 13375 SEWER CLEANING REPAIR PARTS 147603 $2,450.94 *. 07/18/94 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147604 $100.00* 07/18/94 $92.06 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 52509 DISTRIBUTION PAINT 07/18/94 $140.33 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 5487 -7 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $153.99 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 56542 STREET NAME SI PAINT 147605 $386.38* 07/18/94 $108.00 SMITH, LINDA CLASS REFUND 063094 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147606 $108.00* 07/18/94 $35.38 SOHNS, JOYCE A MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 063094 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE 147607 $35.38* 07/18/94 $6,358.53 SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTE REFUND 6600 FRANCE W 070694 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM_ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147608 $6,358.53* 07/18/94 $3,640.55 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 38948 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $1,059.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 38949 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $881.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 39092 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $192.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 30167 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $2,960.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 39086 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 147609 $8,735.05* 07/18/94 $1,695.00 SOUTHSIDE HEATING & AI NEW FURNACE 063094 CDBG FROG PROF SERVICES 147610 $1,695.00* 07/18/94 $800.00 SPPDI CONT ED /POLICE 063094 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 147611 $800.00* 07/18/94 $24.75 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2214036 PONDS & LAKES GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $6.73 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2210036 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $407.39 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2210035 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 14.7612 $438.87* 07/18/94 $31.80 STAR TRIBUNE SALE OF PROPERTY 063094 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPER 07/18/94 $1,409.48 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING PERSONNE 063094 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 07/18/94 $68.00 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING OTHER 061894 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 147613 $1,509.28* 07/18/94 $297.86 STATE OF MINNESOTA CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 122697 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 147614 $297.86* 144450 07/18/94 $727.50 S-Blp;' hq AC INSTRUCTOR 071094 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 14761S $727.50* KAREN KNUTSON 07/18/94 $146.43 STERLING FENCE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 13075 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 147616 $146.43* 07/18/94 $411.73 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 0942062/ PRE - EMPTION EQUIP REPLACEM 147617 $411.73* 07/18/94 $19.17 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 205534 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $2.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 205540 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $263.32 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 205812 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/94 $483.59 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 182021 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 147618 $768.88* 07/18/94 $30.00 SULLIVAN, CHERYL SKATING REFUND 070194 ICE ARENA PROG REGISTRATION F 147619 $30.00* 07/18/94 $144.27 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 71135 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 147620 $144.27* 07/18/94 $52.28 SWANSON, CRAIG MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071294 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147621 $52.28* 07/18/94 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147622 $100.00* 07/18/94 $6.67 SWENSON, SOLVEI MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071194 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 07/18/94 $.29 SWENSON,. SOLVEI OFFICE SUPPLIES 071194 PARK ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLIE 07/18/94 $1.05 SWENSON, SOLVEI OFFICE SUPPLIES 071194 PARK ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLIE 147623 $8.01* 07/18/94 $8.62 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 007018 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $19.07 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 007018 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 147624 $27.69* 07/18/94 $59.28 TARGET CLEANING SUPPLIES 08523 POOL OPERATION CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/94 $31.62 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 97803 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 - $63.89 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 47012727 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 147625 $27.01* 07/18/94 $222.37 TERRY ANN SALES CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 2055 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 147626 $222.37* 07/18/94 $22.00 THE HOUR RECORDING COM NFA CASSETTES 2894 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 147627 $22.00* 07/18/94 $118.22 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 5633781 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $118.22 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 5649151 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 147628 $236.44* 07/18/94 $249.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 5839 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 147629 $249.00* 07/18/94 $10,546.38 THOMSEN- NYBECK PROSECUTION 84870 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES 147630 $10,546.38* 07/18/94 $3,133.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 36579 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/94 $3,019.05 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 36956 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 147631 $6,152.65* 07/38/94 $987.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING PAINT 062194 POOL OPERATION PAINT 147632 $987.00* 07/18/94 $37.68 TOMBSTONE PIZZA CORPAR COST OF GOODS SOLD F 38704286 VANVALKENBURG CST OF GD FOOD 147633 $37.68* 07/18/94 $193.31 TRI- COUNTY DISTRIBUTOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 043818 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 - $11.00 TRI- COUNTY DISTRIBUTOR COST OF GOODS SOLD OA0020 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 07/18/94 $101.07 TRI - COUNTY DISTRIBUTOR COST OF GOODS SOLD 043601 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 147634 $283.38* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT __ PO NUM_ 07/18/94 $141.28 _- TRIARCO )'ARTS & CRAFT _ CRAFT SUPPLIES 125927 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 07/18/94 $159.16 TRIARCQ.ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 125117 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 147635 $300.44* 07/18/94 $596.00 TRUSTEECMPTF SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147636 $596.00* F 07/18/94 $55.86 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30918500 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $87.54 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30537700 CIVIL DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $58.97 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 30602900 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 147637 $202.37* 07/18/94 $80.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT 4 DAY REG FEE 605669 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 147638 $80.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 UNTE, CATHY REFUND SWIMMING 070694 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F i17639 $40.00* 07/18/94 $38.35 US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 062094 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $38.35 US WEST,CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 062094 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $29.79 US WESTt CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 062094 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 07/18/94 $18.44 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 070194 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $26.63 US WEST, CELLULAR TELEPHONE 070194 PARKING MONITO TELEPHONE 147640 $151.56* 07/18/94 $121.88 US WEST; COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $243.18 US WESTCOMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $104.16 US WEST;COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $106.83 US WESTi COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $73.12 US WEST; COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $54.31 US WEST: COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $908.86 US WEST; COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $150.19 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $61.27 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $332.16 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $176.73 US WEST, COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $105.33 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $4,461.15 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 07/18/94 $54.31 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 071894 DARE TELEPHONE 147641 $6,953.48* 07/18/94 $158.35 USAQUATICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10157 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $3,030.00 USAQUATICS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 10159 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES 07/18/94 $336.86 USAQUATICS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10157 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $951.50 USAQUATICS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10158 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 147642 $4,476.71* 07/18/94 $149.10 VAN PAPER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 20030 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $26.83 VAN PAPER CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20906 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/94 $454.76 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 020738 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147643 $630.69* 07/18/94 $207.68 VAN WATERS & ROGERS CHEMICALS ST -24630 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 147644 $207.68* 07/18/94 $140.00 VANDELAC, MATT TREE TRIMMING /GC 070694 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQUI 07/18/94 $300.00 VANDELAC, MATT JR GOLF 071194 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 147645 $440.00* 07/18/94 $40.00 VAUX, JULIE REFUND SWIMMING 070594 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 147646 $40.00* 07/18/94 $476.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE LEASE LINES 1137 GOLF CARS LEASE LINES 07/18/94 $1,232.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 1136 GOLF CARS EQUIP MAINT 147647 $1,708.00* 07/18/94 $600.00 VICE, GARY SPLASH 070694 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147648 $600.00* 07/18/94 $1,100.00 VICTOR CARLSON & SONS CONTRACT REAPIR 05973 STORM SEWER CIP 147649 $1,100.00* 07/18/94 $495.23 VOSS LIGHTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 241773 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 147650 $495.23* 07/18/94 $91.72 WACO SCAFFOLDING & EQU GENERAL SUPPLIES 546415 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 147651 $91.72* 07/18/94 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147652 $100.00* 07/18/94 $382.34 WARNER IND SUPPLY ACCESSORIES 10965220 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 147653 $382.34* 07/18/94 $1.72 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 071294 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $92.98 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 071294 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $18.09 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 071294 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/94 $38.95 WATERSTREET, JOAN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIE 071294 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES 07/18/94 $9.70 WATERSTREET, JOAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 071294 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 07/18/94 $72.05 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 071294 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 07/18/94 $24.49 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 071294 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS 07/18/94 $9.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 071294 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 07/18/94 $9.50 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 071294 CIVIL DEFENSE CONF & SCHOOLS 147654 $276.48* 07/18/94 $45.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 16340 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 147655 $45.00* 07/18/94 $480.14 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 12816 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 147656 $480.14* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 15 1994 00:07:34 Page 28 CHECK NO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -------- PO NUM. 07/18/94 $62.00 WESTLEY`', CAROL CLASS REFUND 071194 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147657 $62.00* 07/18/94 $3,000.00 WHITE OAK SOCIETY SPLASH 071194 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO SVC OTHER 147658 $3,000.00* 07/18/94 $139.46 WILSON'S NORTH WEST NU MULCH 00514 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 07/18/94 $222.92 WILSON'S NORTH WEST NU MULCH 16290 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 147659 $362.38* 07/18/94 $428.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 07404 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 147660 $428.00* 07/18/94 $51.00 WIRTH, RUTH CLASS REFUND 071294 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 147661 $51.00* 07/18/94 $244.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38682 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $522.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38561 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $98.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF.GOODS SOLD W 38562 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $250.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 15782 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $116.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38456 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $250.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 15783 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/94 $180.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 15825 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147662 $1,660.50* 07/18/94 $100.00 WROBLES,KI, HENRY POLICE SERVICES JULY 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 147663 $100.00* 07/18/94 $424.61 XEROX CORP EQUIPMENT RENTAL 42393444 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL 147664 $424.61* $2,720,870.19 4 0 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Fri Jul 15 1994 00:09:21 Page 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $1,820,301.30 FUND # 11 C.D.B.G. $1,695.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATION $156.22 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $10,321.67 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $6,486.70 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL $12,997.04 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE $101,413.31 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA $16,755.49 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE $343.22 FUND # 30 EDINB /CENT LAKES $40,622.60 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $53,617.59 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER $2,378.67 FUND # 42 RECYCLING $39,779.77 FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $66,121.76 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCT FUND $231,444.85 FUND # 66 IBR #2 FUND $316,435.00 $2,720,870.19 e e COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/03/94 $130,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 060394 LIQUOR FROG CASH 06/03/94 - $130,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 060394 LIQUOR PROG CASH 144432 $.00* 06/06/94 $22,836.08 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE /FICA 060694 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 144433 $22,836.08* 06/06/94 $19.62 PERA PERA 060694 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 144434 $19.62* 06/06/94 $26,751.37 PERA PERA 060694 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 144435 $26,751.37* 06/17/94 $137,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 061794 LIQUOR FROG CASH 06/17/94 - $137,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 061794 LIQUOR FROG CASH 06/17/94 - $137,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 061794 LIQUOR PROG CASH 06/17/94 $137,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 061794 LIQUOR PROG CASH 144436 $.00* 06/21/94 $28,560.64 PERA PERA 062194 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 144437 $28,560.64* 06/21/94 $19.62 PERA PERA 062194 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 144438 $19.62* 06/17/94 $516.00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURA LIFE INSURANCE 061794 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 144439 $516.00* 06/21/94 $24,908.04 FIDELITY BANK FICA /MEDICARE 061794 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 144440 $24,908.04* 06/23/94 $3,500.00 REMOTE EFFECT' SYSTEM FIREWORKS 062394 FIREWORKS GENERAL SUPPLI 144441 $3,500.00* 06/28/94 $290.00 KERRISON, DAWN BOUNCER FOR RAGER 062794 teen dance pro EQUIP REPLACEM 144442 $290.00* 06/07/94 $347.29 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30766 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $71.43 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30771 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $210.08 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30776 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146450 $628.80* 06/07/94 $687.65 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37826 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $457.30 ED PHILLIPS 4 SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37831 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $536.80 ED PHILLIPS r. SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37834 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $166.65 ED PHILLIPS t SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37934 50TH ST :SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $477.85 ED PHILLIPS SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37935 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $486.05 ED PHILLIPS SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37975 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $370.84 ED PHILLIPS . SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38077 50TH ST !;ELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $725.25 ED PHILLIPS SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38078 YORK SEL'.ING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTE: FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGE.AM OBJECT PO NIM. - - - - -- - -- --------------- - - - - 06/07/94 -- - ------------------ $1,005.82 - - - - -- .ED PHILLIPS +. ------------------- SONS COST - OF - - - -- GOODS SOLD W 38081 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $110.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 36985 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $185.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 38082 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/07/94 $20.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS.SOLD M 38190 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/07/94 $418.31 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38171 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $70.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 38177 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/07/94 $636.93 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38178 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $613.34 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38189 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 146452 $6,969.84* 06/07/94 $968.51 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30763 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $2,026.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30764 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $54.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 22571 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $618.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30767 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 - $163.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W E0939 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $909.62 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30768 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $4,123.59 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30773 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $580.26 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 32086 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 146453 $9,118.57* 06/07/94 $603.92 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1997790 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $489.94 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1997808 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE - 06/07/94 $7.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 1997816 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/07/94 $799:63 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 1997824 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $1,992.36 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 1997832 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $524.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1997782 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $806.07 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 20001006 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $872.55 JOHNSON WINE -CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2010767 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $705.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000883 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $907.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000891 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $787.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000909 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $1,503.24 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2000917 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $2,903.24 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2000925 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $104.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000941 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $773.32 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000958 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $245.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2000966 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $313.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF-GOODS SOLD W 2000982 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $308.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2000990 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 146455 $14,648.03* 06/07/94 $81.18 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30679 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $27.72 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30680 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $42.52 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 29533 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $907.12 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30765 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $50.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30775 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/07/94 $769.31 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30769 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $25.24 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 30770 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/07/94 $995.86 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 30774 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146456 $2,899.44* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/07/94 $204.19 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 190537 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $237.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 190749 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 - $25.02 QUALITY WINE CASH DISCOUNTS 189284 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS 06/07/94 $995.56 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 190863 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $481.05 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 192121 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/07/94 $1,412.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 191446 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $105.96 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 191508 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $2,453.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 191535 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $2,441.38 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 191536 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/07/94 $347.12 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 191658 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 146457 $8,653.84* 06/13/94 - $19.99 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 04424 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 - $14.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 04378 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $180.32 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33140 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $41.58 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 33142 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $450.30 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 33141 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $296.84 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 33143 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $67.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 33242 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $22.52 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33243 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 146461 $1,024.88* 06/13/94 $387.73 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 33439 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $650.06 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS:SOLD L 40214 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $40.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 40215 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $1,507.39 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40220 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $1,223.05 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40223 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $536.68 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40288 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $450.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40289 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $1,082.87 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40295 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $298.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40296 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $1,576.46 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40299 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $111.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 40300 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/13/94 $1,126.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40301 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 - $20.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 149812 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $510.76 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40487 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $150.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41169 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $774.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40498 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $592.06 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40501 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $20.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40502 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146463 $11,018.46* 06/13/94 $2,387.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 30772 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $174.08 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 32083 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $116.05 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 32084 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $2,184.83 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 33392 VERNCN SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 - $995.82 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 04473 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $4,228.92 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 33393 VERNCN SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $114.64 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 34561 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $520.46 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 33394 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU C12UNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR ; :AND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 19A 08:33:47 CHECK NO DATE CHECK APOUNT JOHNSON VENDOR - - - -- ------------------------- DESCRIPTION - ------------------- 06/13/94 - - -- -- ------------------- $1,640.68 GRIGGS - COOPER & CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 06/13/94 $8 ?4.53 GRIGGS COOPER & CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 06/13/94 $?.3.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 06/13/94 $2,306.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 146464 $13,545.21* SOLD W 0030395 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF INVOICE PROGRAM I. 33395 50TH ST SELLIN L 33397 YORK SELLING M_33398 YORK SELLING - L 33399 YORK SELLING Page 4 OBJECT PO NUM. CST OF GD LIQU CST OF GD LIQU CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $1.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD-W 0030387 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $42.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2043842 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $8.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 0030395 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $8.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 0030403 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $38.92 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2000974 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 - $40.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2006617 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 - $19.53 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2006625 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 -$5.86 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2006633 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $273.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2010858 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $244.68 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2029577 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $366.49 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $942.38 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031029 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $165.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2031037 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $2,685.62 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2031045 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $3,217.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2031058 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $627.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031060 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $208.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031086 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $567.86 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031094 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $69.56 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2031102 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $503.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2031110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $1,317.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2031128 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $155.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031136 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $321.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031151 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $1,385.72 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031169 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $54.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2031177 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $1,240.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD•L 2031185 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $213.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031201 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $596.32 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2031219 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146466 $15,192.03* 06/13/94 $1,054.48 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 32771 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $89.35 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 32772 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $162.36 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 32770 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $321.26 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3277 3 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $25.24 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 32776 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $25.24 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 32774 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/13/94 $926.94 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 32775 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146467 $2,604.87* 06/13/94 $88.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 093680 VERNON SELLING -CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 - $57.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 189838 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $2,090.16 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 190113 YORK SELLING CST OF.GD WINE 06/13/94 $525.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 191939 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 - $45.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 192275 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/13/94 $717.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 192900 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/13/94 $226.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 192902 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/13/94 $835.61 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 192947 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $606.39 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 192948 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $71.80 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 092901 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/13/94 $258.39 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 192951 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/13/94 $3,876.53 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 193579 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $1,214.41 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 193576 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/13/94 $2,049.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 193577 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 146468 $12,458.13* 06/21/94 $113.94 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 35315 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $545.33 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35420 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $593.86 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35314 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $137.07 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 35421 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $112.32 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 36006 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $183.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35422 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $483.75 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 36005 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146870 $2,169.42* 06/21/94 $836.39 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 42304 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $305.84 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 42338 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $476.63 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42340 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $679.89 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS'SOLD W 42346 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $584.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 42347 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $387.66 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42348 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $720.54 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42396 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $245.30 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42401 YORK'SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $571.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42403 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $138.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $935.97 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42479 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 - $30.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CASH DISCOUNTS 149999 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS 06/21/94 $489.74 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 42485 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $1,208.88 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42488 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $37.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 42486 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 146871 $7,587.69* 06/21/94 $114.64 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 34562 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $66.23 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 34802 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $33.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 34803 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 - $26.51 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. CASH DISCOUNTS 05033 VERNON SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS 06/21/94 $2,908.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36124 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $4,232.19 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36129 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $465.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36125 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 S1,885.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36126 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $199.09 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 36128 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 146872 X9,877.47* 06/21/94 $251.90 JOHNSON WINE CC. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062537 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $764.24 JOHNSON WINE CC. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062545 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REG STER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 CHECK NO DATE 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 06/21/94 146873 Page 6 CHECK AMOUNT VEI.DOR PRIOR WINE COMPANY DESCRIPTION OF GOODS INVOICE {ROGRAM --- ------------------- OBJECT - 10 NUM. - - - -- - - - - - -- ------------------ $507.75 - - - - -- JOHNSON ------------------- MINE CO. - - COST - - OF -- ----------------------- GOODS SOLD L 2062560 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU $1,218.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2062578 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU $387.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062586 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE $103.50 JOHNSON WINE CO: COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2053668 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU $376.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062594 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE $176.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2074144 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $299.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062602 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $603.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062610 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $15.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2062628 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $1,521.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2062636 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU $3,057.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2062644 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU $147.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062651 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $1,294.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062669 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $10,726.06* QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 195668 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 146875 $9,031.69* 06/21/94 $854.03 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35561 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $486.29 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35562 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $81..18 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35490 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $89.35 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 35563 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $63.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD -M 35565 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/21/94 $1,415.48 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 35564 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146874 $2,990.18* 06/21/94 $283.70 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 14340 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/21/94 -$6.06 QUALITY WINE CASH DISCOUNTS' 193001 YORK SELLING CASH DISCOUNTS 06/21/94 $982.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 194802 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $1,254.44 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 194808 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $59.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 195180 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/21/94 $4,056.44 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 195441 YORK SELLING . CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $290.15 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 194784 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/21/94 $1,942.32 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 195442 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/21/94 $169.29 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 195668 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 146875 $9,031.69* 06/27/94 $496.29 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38340 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $103.24 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 38341 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $288.24 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38349 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $206.56 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38345 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 146880 $1,094.33* 06/27/94 $1,331.88 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44515 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $707.97 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 707.97 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $18.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 44516 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $1,553.42 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 44517 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $626.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44547 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $592.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44549 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $1,116.02 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44554 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $1,813.74 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 44555 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $883.10 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44556 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $236.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44826 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/27/94 $34.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 44827 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $562.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44845 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $590.51 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44850 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 146881 $10,069.09* 06/27/94 $1,573.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36123 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $2,110.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36127 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $80.33 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 36572 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $2,637.35 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38338 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $5,604.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38339 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $562.24 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38342 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $32.30 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 38343 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $1,527.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38344 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 - $21.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 05267 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $526.59 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 38346 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 - $19.92 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. overpayment A30772 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $2,596.87 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38347 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $213.44 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 38348 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $25.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 38914 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $178.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 39542 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 146882 $17,627.43* 06/27/94 -$5.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 0040147 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 - $15.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS.-SOLD M 2022036 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 - $13.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2022044 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $1,662.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2031193 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $208.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062461 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $662.04 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062479 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $1,204.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2062495 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $2,156.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2062503 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $735.76 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2062511 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 - $14.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2076156 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $195.48 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093664 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $700.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093672 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $37.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2093680 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 - $23.26 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 0039990 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $4,060.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2093698 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $800.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2097707 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $3,369.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2093706 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $293.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093714 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $94.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093722 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $614.40 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093730 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $217.13 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $372.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093755 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $15.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2093763 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $902.81 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2093771 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $716.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2093789 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $20.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 2093789 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $86.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093797 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $285.76 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093805 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISIE'R FOR HAND CHECKS Wed JuL 13 1994 08:33:47 Pa le 8 CHECK NO DATE 'HECK AMOUNT VEND(;2 DESCRIPTI)N INVOICE PRC;RAM OBJECT - -PO 'IUM. ------------- - - - - -- 06/27/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $412.61 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2097699 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $1,560.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2097749 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $578.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2097764 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $2,807.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2097731 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $22.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2097715 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $20.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2097731 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $1,462.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2097723 YORK SELLING . CST OF GD LIQU 146885 $26,207.96* 06/27/94 $81.18 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD ,W 37782 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $25.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37781 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $1,005.41 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD.W 37780 VERNON SELLING. CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $27.72 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37779 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $48.61 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 36852 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $1,076.35 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37785 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $47.52 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37786 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/27/94 $27.72 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37784 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $537.95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 37783 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 146886 $2,877.95* 06/27/94 $599.80 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 196774 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $421.31 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 196775 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $743.15 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 196776 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $6,959.21 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 197469 VERNON SELLING _CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $125.65 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 196667 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $89.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 196666 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $3,199.33 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 195553 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $1,893.04 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 194799 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/27/94 $828.80 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 196668 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $179.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 194783 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/27/94 $211.92 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 197893 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $4,221.54 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 197473 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 06/27/94 $3,058.87 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 197474 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 146887 $22,531.87* 07/06/94 $45.34 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 38350 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 - $29.70 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 05688 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $349.03 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40297 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $68.01 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 40304 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 $201.66 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40300 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $525.10 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40303 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147291 $1,159.44* 07/06/94 - $41.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 150191 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 $132.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 47538 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 -$2.79 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 150286 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $244.26 ED PHILLIPS& SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 46635 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $1,115.97 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 46650 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 07/06/94 $980.21 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD L M 46654 46655 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 $34.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/06/94 $361.01 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46704 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $562.11 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46707 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $1,592.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46708 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $187.03 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46797 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $330.09 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46877 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $575.47 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46891 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $330.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 47065 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $530.34 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 47083 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $1,879.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 47090 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147293 $8,811.40* 07/06/94 - $11.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 05311 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 - $161.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF.GOODS SOLD L 05310 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $50.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 39977 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $1,751.22 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40894 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $165.06 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40833 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $53.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40898 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $467.47 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40899 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $178.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40900 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $262.40 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40895 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $4,571.37 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40901 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $2,744.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40896 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $1,578.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40902 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $55.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS 'SOLD L 41556 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $102.84 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 41557 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $55.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 41558 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $205.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 41559 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $1,664.28 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 40897 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 147295 $13,733.93* 07/06/94 - $55.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2102911 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 - $30.47 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2124758 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $364.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2125615 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $1,519.86 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2125623 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $5,260.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2125631 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $181.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2125649 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $82.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2125656 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 $609.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2125664 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $364.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129690 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $986.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129708 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $(,141.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 2129716 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $106.73 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129724 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $889.26 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129732 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $820.84 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129740 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $37.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD.M 2129757 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 - $63.31 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST of GOODS SOLD W 2076768 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $659.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129765 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $273.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLI) W 2076776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 5773.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLI) W 2129773 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $:,477.42 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOL') L 2129781 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK RE:ISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wei Jul 13 1994 08:33:47 Page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT V=:NDOR DESCRIPTION - - -- ------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ---------- - - - - -- ------------- 07/06/91 ---- $24.31 -- - - - - -- -------- ------ JOHNSON WINE CO. ----- - - COST OF ;OODS SOLD M 2129799 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/91 $545.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2129807 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/91 - $19.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF ,ODDS SOLD W 2076784 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147297 $21,403.56* 07/06/91 $1,268.69 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40298 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $83.16 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40299 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $824.65 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40301 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $108.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40296 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $32.17 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 40302 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 -$7.14 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 05728 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $611.97 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40305 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $63.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40306 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $25.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 40307 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/06/94 - $10.66 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 05727 YORK SELLING' CST OF GD WINE 147298 $3,000.69* 07/06/94 $312.55 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 199167 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/06/94 $2,640.57 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 199239 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $123.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 199168 YORK SELLING CST OF _GDS BEE 07/06/94 $1,589.42 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 199240 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $84.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199470 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $6,814.94 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199537 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $64.10 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 199538 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $2,386.49 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199539 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $64.10 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 199540 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/06/94 $4,645.24 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199564 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $155.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199621 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $454.45 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 199624 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $95.89 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 19.9691 VERNON- SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/06/94 $2,846.32 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 199238 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 147299 $22,277.37* $399,341.00 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jul 13 1994 08:43:50 Page 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $107,111.37 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $290.00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $291,939.63 $399,341.00