Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 5, 1994 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items -and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of November 21, 1994 II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 12/01/94 Total: $16,393.75 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Council Meetings of September 19, November 7 and November 21, 1994, and Closed Meeting of November 21, 1994 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Comprehensive Plan Review - Northwest Edina B. Final Plat Approval - Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition - Outlot A. Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition C. Reconsideration of Partial Release of'Conservation Restriction - Lot 4, Mark Dalquist Addition - Set Hearing Date (01/03/95) * D. Lot Division - Lot 9, Block 1, Sioux Trail Fourth Addition (6917 -19 McCauley Trail) III. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Utility and Drainage Easement - Lot 6, Block 9, South Garden Estates 3rd Addition IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council to pass. A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1994 -12 - An Ordinance Amending Code Section 300 to Allow Animal Control Officer to Declare a Dog Potentially Dangerous Agenda Edina City Council December 5, 1994 Page Two V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Bituminous Distributor with Hydrostatic Drive (Contd from 11/21/94) B. Skid Steer Loader (Continue to 12/19/94) C. Collection of Garbage and Refuse - City Properties VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Report - Golden Valley Microwave Foods B. Set Date for 1995 Board of Review (04/10/95) VII. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition for STOP sign at Benton Avenue /Johnson Drive - Rick Danmeier, 5600 Benton Avenue B. Petition for Street Lighting - Opposite 5716 Creek Valley Road VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. FINANCE A. Adoption of 1995 City Budget and 1995 Tax Levy B. Ordinance No. 1994 -11 - Amending Code Section 185 to Increase Certain Fees C. Resolution - Park and Recreation Fees D. Resolution - Ambulance Fees E. Resolution - Miscellaneous Fees F. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 12/01/94 Total $657,172.48 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Sat Dec 10 Council Study Session - Edina Fire 8:30 A.M. -12 Noon Arneson Acres Department 1992 -94 Study Mon Dec 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Thurs Dec 29 Year End Council Meeting 5:00 P.M. Mgrs. Conf. Room Mon Jan 2 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Jan 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Jan 16 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Jan 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers NINOTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT ADTHORITY NOVEMBER 21, 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Notion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the ERA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *IIIPOTES OF ERA MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7. 1994, APPROVED Notion was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the ERA Ninutes of November 7, 1994, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the ERA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 17, 1994, and consisting of one page totaling $1,125.00. Commissioner Rice seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:43:41 Page 1 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 12/05/94 $24.37 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 112194/H GRANDVIEW MISC 012657 $24.37* 12/05/94 $14.09 DEPENDABLE COURIER COURIER SERVICE 271601 EDINBOROUGH MISC 012658 $14.09* 12/05/94 $877.62 DORSEY & WHITNEY ATTY FEES 389105 EDINBOROUGH PRO FEES LEG /S 012659 $877.62* 12/05/94 $15.00 FLEMING, JUDY REFUND PARKING PERMI 041 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT 012660 $15.00* 12/05/94 $14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR CO HRA BOND PAYMENT DEC 1994 EDINBOROUGH LOAN TO OTH FU 012661 $14,166.67* 12/05/94 $1,296.00 SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN ARCH FEES 94111634 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E 012662 $1,296.00* $16,393.75 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 19, 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards Member Kelly arrived after adoption of the Consent Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT AND AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously for adoption of a Proclamation proclaiming the month of October, 1994, as Disability Employment and Awareness Month in the City of Edina. Paula Carlson and Rich Forslund, parents of Marie Forslund, accepted the proclamation on behalf of all persons with disabilities. FINAL REZONING GRANTED - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,_PCD -4 TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PCD -3 AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR 3500 WEST 69TH STREET Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen presented the request for final rezoning from Planned Commercia District, PCD -4 to Planned Commercial District PCD -3 and final development plan approval for property located at 3500 West 69th Street. The site was formerly developed as a service station and is now vacant. At its meeting of September 7, 1994, the Council granted preliminary rezoning for development of this property as a commercial banking facility. A condition of preliminary approval was execution of an agreement by the property owner which would require corrective measures if the bank caused traffic to stack on West 69th Street or the existing Southdale Center ring road system. The agreement has been prepared, reviewed by representatives of Southdale, and found acceptable with one change. They have asked that the words "reasonably" and "reasonable" be inserted in paragraph 1, i.e. "... to construct improvements to the Improvements as are reasonably acceptable to the City Manager and City Planner, in their sole reasonable discretion.... ". Staff has agreed to those two changes and would recommend final rezoning for the property, subject to execution and recording of the traffic management agreement. Presentation by Proponent Representatives of Southdale Center were present and indicated they had nothing further to add to the presentation by Planner Larsen. Public Comment Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed rezoning for the subject property. No comment or objection was heard. Council Action Member Smith moved second reading and adoption of the following ordinance, subject to an executed and recorded traffic management agreement: ORDINANCE NO. 850 -5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (PCD -3) FROM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (PCD -4) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Commercial District (PCD -3) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. 0629, Files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County. The extent of the Planned Commercial district (PCD -4) is reduced by removing the property described above from the PCD -4 District ". Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full fuaPe and effect upon its passage and publication. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. Member Smith then moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER PROPERTY AT 3500 WEST 69TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Southdale Center property at 3500 West 69th Street, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 19, 1994, be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. FINAL FIAT APPROVED FOR HENLEY ADDITION (50TH STREET AND HALIFAX AVENUE) Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen recalled that on August 15, 1994, the Council granted final. rezoning and preliminary plat approval for this 24 unit condominium development of four properties located at West 50th Street and Halifax Avenue. The proponent. has submitted a final plat and are requesting approval. The purpose of the plat is to consolidate the numerous parcels of property included in the development under one new lot and block legal description. Since the site comprises parcels which were previously platted, no subdivision dedication is required. At its meeting of September 8, 1994, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approved the grading plan for this development. Staff would recommend final plat approval, subject to a landscaping bond for the project. Member Smith asked if the concerns of the single family property owner next to the alley and immediately west of the project regarding water drainage have been addressed. Engineer Hoffman explained that the grading plan provides for a retaining wall so that there will be less water going to the west. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adopL,on: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR HENLEY ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "HENLEY ADDITION ", platted by Henley Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City council of September 19, 1994, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO 1994 -8 (AMENDING CODE SECTION 150 TO CLARIFY VACATION ACCRUAL AND PROVIDE POLICIES CONCERNING DRUG FREE WORKPLACE AND FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Assistant to Manager Smith informed Council that staff is requesting second reading of Ordinance No. 1994 -8 (Amending Code Section 150 to Clarify Vacation Accrual and Provide Policies Concerning Drug Free Workplace and Family and Medical Leave). Staff has made the suggested correction and modifications. Mayor Richards called for public comment on Ordinance No. 1994 -8. No comment or objection was heard. Member Rice moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1994 -8 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 150 OF THE CITY CODE TO CLARIFY VACATION ACCRUAL AND PROVIDE FOR POLICIES CONCERNING DRUG FREE WORKPLACE AND FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 5 of Subsection 150.09 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 5. Maximum Annual Carry Forward. All regular full -time employees with five continuous years of employment or less may carry forward from one calendar year to the next all vacation leave earned during the calendar year. All regular full -time employees with more than five continuous years of employment may carry forward not more than 40 hours of vacation earned during a calendar year. Vacation leave earned but not taken which exceeds 40 hours per calendar year shall be deducted from each employee's vacation balance at the end of each calendar year. The maximum amount of vacation that may be taken during a calendar year is 25 days except that additional days may be taken in accordance with the family and medical leave policy adopted pursuant to Subsection 150.13." Section 2. Section 150 of the City Code is amended by providing a new Subsection 150.22 as follows: "150.22 Drug Free Workplace. The City is committed to providing.a healthy and efficient work force free from the effects of drug abuse. In keeping with this commitment, the City maintains a policy in compliance with the Federal Drug =Free Workplace Act of 1988 and applicable State law." Section 3. Subsection 150.13 of the City Code is amended to-read as follows: "150.13 Family and Medical Leave. The City will grant leave to eligible employees due to a variety of family and medical circumstances. The City maintains a policy concerning the eligibility for and the use of such leave in accordance with the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993." Section 4. Subdivision 3 of Subsection 150.10 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subdivision 3. Purpose. Sick leave with pay maybe granted to employees entitled thereto when the employee is unable to perform scheduled work duties due to illness /disability, the necessity for medical, dental, or chiropractic care, childbirth or pregnancy disability, exposure to contagious disease where such exposure may endanger the health of others with whom the employee would come in contact in the course of performing work duties. Sick leave with pay may also be granted for a variety of other family and medical circumstances. The amount and conditions under which sick leave with pay may be used for such circumstances is provided in the family and medical leave policy adopted pursuant to subsection 150.13 of this Code. Sick leave with pay may be granted for a maximum of five days in the event of the death of an employee's spouse, father, mother, spouse's father or mother or child and a maximum of three days in the event of the death of an employee's grandparent, grandchild, brother or sister." Section 5. Subsections 150.22, 150.23 and 150.24 of the City Code are renumbered 150.23, 150.24 and 150.25 respectively. Section 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -10 - AMENDING CITY CODE BY REPEALING SUBSECTION 900.26 (AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF PROVISION TO CHANGE HOUPS OF SALE FOR LIQUOR AND WINE) GRANTED FIRST READING Assistant Manger Hughes reminded Council that on October 18, 1993, the Council amended the City Code to permit the sale of wine or intoxicating liquor commencing at 10:00 A.M. on Sundays. Prior to that enactment, Sunday sales could not commence until noon. As adopted, the ordinance contained a sunset provision whereby the ordinance would terminate on October 27, 1994. The proposed Ordinance No. 1994 -10 would eliminate the sunset provision and incorporate the 10:00 A.M. Sunday sale language as a permanent part of the City Code. Chief Bernhjelm reports no incidents with respect to the Sunday morning sales during the past year. Staff would recommend adoption of Ordinance,No. 1994 -10. Member Smith moved First Reading of Ordinance Ncyy 994 -10 - An Ordinance Amending the City Code by Repealing - Subsection 900.26 (,c:,owatic Termination of Provision Allowing the Sale of Wine or Intoxicating Commencing at 10:00 A.M. on Sundays) as presented and on file in the of-fice of the City Clerk. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *BID AWARDED FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD LANDSCAPING Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Valley View Road Landscaping to recommended low bidder, Vilson's Nursery, Inc., at $35,177.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66 - SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IN COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENT NO. S -67 - VALLEY LANE SIDEWALK Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Improvement a No. S -66 - Sidewalk Replacement in Country Club District and Improvement No. S -67 - Valley Lane Sidewalk to recommended low bidder, Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc., at $160,943.75. Motion carried on rollca1L vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REROOFING AND DECK REPAIR AT FOUR PARK BUILDINGS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for reroofing and deck repair.for park buildings at Pamela, Arden, Highlands and Normandale Parks to recommended low bidder, McPhillips Bros. Roofing Company, at $51,370.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ROAD SALT FOR 1994 -95 WINTER SEASON Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for road salt for the 1994 -95 winter season to North American Salt at $27.46/ton, through State of Minnesota Contract M -8762. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 8 1994 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the following actions as recommended.in Section A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of September 8, 1994: 1) Installation of "Winding Road Curve Signs" with a 25 MPH advisory on Long Brake Trail and Police Department consideration of the area for enforcement emphasis; 2) Installation of "No Parking Here to Corner" sign on northbound Wooddale Avenue south of Wooddale Glenn; 3) Installation of "Watch for Pedestrians" signs with a 25 MPH advisory speed placard along Grove Street and that a neighborhood letter informing residents of the needs for safety for school children be sent to the affected area; , and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the report as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. TREATMENT OF CATTAILS APPROVED FOR POND AT WOODDALE AVENUE/VALLEY VIEW ROAD Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman recalled that at the Council meeting of September 7, 1994, property owners adjacent to the pond, generally located at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, expressed concern over the expanding cattail growth and general health of the pond. Staff has learned from the Minnesota Department of Natural' Resources (DNR) that efforts can be made to control cattail growth to existing areas. However, dredging cannot be done for aesthetic reasons, only for navigation or stormwater clean -up around stormwater pipes. The Council had asked for information concerning projects on other City ponds and lakes. On the Millpond the City's contribution is approximately $1,500 to an approximate $8,000 assessment project. On Indianhead Lake the adjacent property owners are assessed for the entire project cost. On Arrowhead Lake the City's contribution is approximately $5,000 towards a larger project budget of $20,000. The smaller ponds in the City are maintained on a job by job basis with the City's contractor, Lake Restoration, Inc., per DNR permits. In summary, Engineer Hoffman said the DNR would not permit dredging for aesthetic purposes, would allow treatment of a portion of the cattails, and would encourage treatment of purple loosestrife which is a noxious weed. He then introduced Bob Salonek, of Lake Restoration, Inc. to explain the herbicide treatment. Mr. Salonek said the cattails and loosestrife would be treated with the herbicide "Rodeo" which has a toxicity level the same as table salt. It breaks down the ability of the plant to process sunlight thus eliminating its source of food. The product will break down very rapidly in the environment; the only place it can be found within 24 hours after treatment is within the tissues of the plant. It cannot accumulate in fish, wildlife or humans. Treatments will normally be effective for from three to five years before there is regrowth from adjacent untreated areas. Member Rice asked how much treatment would be required to get the pond back to the condition in the 1971 aerial photo. Mr. Salonek answered that one treatment would do it if the DNR would allow that by permit. Engineer Hoffman interjected that the DNR would not allow that rapid a reduction of the cattail bog. Staff would recommend treatment of the cattails to contain the expanding growth area with a goal of gradually reducing the cattail bog to the 1971 status.. Public Comment Speaking in support of treatment of the pond were Marge.Bergquist, 4515 Garrison Lane; Constance Baarsch, 4500 Garrison Lane; Rosemary Booth, 6109 St. Johns Avenue; Karen Gutterman, Paul Hanson, 4520 Garrison Lane; Frank Barnard, 4504 Garrison Lane; and Douglas Polich, 6113 St. Johns Avenue, who commented that the pond needs dredging also. Paul Gutterman,, 4520 Garrison Lane, said that it is clear that the residents who live on the pond are in support of treatment of the pond to control the cattails. He added that there should be general maintenance to clear the stormwater drains of debris. Regarding dredging, he asked that the Public Works staff work with the DNR on this issue and suggested that the residents maybe could bear part of that cost. Mayor Richards asked about costs for treatment and some dredging. Engineer Hoffman said the herbicide treatment is estimated to be under $500.00. The DNR may permit some maintenance dredging at the northwest corner where the stormwater outlet is located, with the cost funded by the stormwater utility fund. As to general dredging of the lake, the DNR has said the answer is no. Staff can continue to work with the neighbors and DNR on this issue. Mayor Richards raised the issue of who should bear the cost because of lack of public access to the pond. He suggested that.those private property owners who benefit could be expected to bear 50 percent of the cost. Engineer Hoffman explained that the cost to treat these small ponds has come from the stormwater utility fund in the past and that approximately $10,000 has been spent annually on the City's small ponds. If the Council desired to change that policy, notices could be sent this winter to all property owners abutting ponds saying if they wanted to stay in the treatment program it may cost a certain amount per lot. Member Rice made a motion to: 1) authorize herbicide treatment of the pond at Vooddale Avenue/Valley View Lane to contain the growth of cattails /loosestrife to be funded by the stormwater utility fund, 2) authorize maintenance dredging at the stormwater outlet to be funded by the stormwater utility fund, and 3) direct staff to bring back a proposed policy for future funding of City pond treatment. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *HEARING DATE OF 11/07/94 SET FOR PROPOSED INCREASE IN WINE AND BEER LICENSE FEES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith setting November 7, 1994, as hearing date for proposed increase in wine and beer license fees. Motion carried on rollcall'vote, four ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPOINTING GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPOINT GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on the list as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as election judges for the State General /City Election to be conducted on November 8, 1994; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *REPORT ACKNOWLEDGED ON 1995 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES SEWER RATES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to acknowledge the report on the 1995 Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services Sewer Rates indicating an increase of 13.5 %. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. WATER RATE STUDY PRESENTED• RECOMMENDED WATER RATES FOR 1995 APPROVED Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman presented a Water Rate Study for the City of Edina completed by the City's consultant, Progressive Consulting Engineers, Inc. He,said the study has projected and analyzed revenue requirements of the City's public utilities water division for the next 10 years. A primary goal was to evaluate the current water rate structure and the adequacy of the revenue generated. New water rates were developed to cover the projected water division costs. Also, the effects of new and pending government legislation on wellhead protection, conservation and emergency planning were considered in developing the recommended new rates. In summary, Engineer Hoffman said the study contains recommendations in Chapter Four which would change the billing method to include a fixed rate meter charge and then the customer pays a rate for all water used as opposed to the current minimum charge. Additionally, the proposed rate for residential lawn sprinkling will go up to a higher rate when more than 100 units of water per quarter is used in the summer. Commercial /industrial rate would not go up with use because the water is used to operate their businesses. The use above the 100 unit limit rate would apply to about 20 percent of.the summer utility users. This proposal is in line with the intent of the new water conservation act. The City will need to provide a response and plan to Metropolitan Council regarding emergency water planning and conservation. The other primary issues that would affect the proposed rate structure involve capital funds for ongoing infrastructure updates and repairs, and continuing government legislation. A utility capital improvement schedule for the next eight years was presented showing an expected expenditure of approximately $750,000 per year. Government legislation pertains to the Water Conservation Act (higher rate for lawn sprinkling), the 1986 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (testing for additional contaminants), the 1992 Energy Policy Act (retrofitting of plumbing fixtures to reduce water consumption), the Well Head Protection Plan (required as part of the SDWA), Environmental Protection Agency rules on radon, and the Emergency Preparedness and Conservation Plan. Engineer Hoffman showed overheads of the current and projected water rates and their affects. He noted that the projected rates consist of a fixed rate meter charge plus a commodity charge for actual water used. Fixed or service charges cover those costs that are fairly constant and are not generally affected by temporal variations in -cater use by customers. Allocation of these costs to individual customers would be according to meter'size expressed in terms of meter "equivalents ", where larger meters are considered "equivalent" to a specified number of standard 5/8 inch meters (size of majority of meters in Edina). This means that customers with larger meters will pay a larger fixed charge. The following chart was presented indicating the recommended water rates: Quarterly Quarterly Year Fixed Charge Commodity Charge 1995 $6.60 per 5/8" meter Residential use <100 units /qtr and all equivalent commercial /industrial use = $0.56 /unit* Residential use >100 units /qtr and all irrigation meters use —$0.74 /unit 1996 Annual increase to Annual increase to match inflation match inflation ( *l unit = 100 cubic feet of water) In conclusion, Engineer Hoffman said the recommended rates would allow the water cash balance to increase which is undesirably low at present, being only a fraction of the annual operation and maintenance costs, and would allow for needed infrastructure improvements . Member Smith asked how the system was paid for initially. Engineer Hoffman said the original system for most homes was paid by the developer doing the building. The last City project was the addition of a water tower and well paid with a bond which is expected to be retired in 1999. The proposed water rates approach would be based on water use and would not involve selling bonds. He observed that water sales over the past three years have been flat due to the cool summers. In addition, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has increased its rates much of which is attributable to a $154,000 carry over from the wet summer of 1993 when a substantially higher volume of waste water was treated. Member Rice asked why a commercial user such as a car wash should pay less than someone using water in the home. Engineer Hoffman said the difference is that, in the example of a car wash, water is needed to operate the business. However, if a large increase in water consumption in the home is uses such as lawn watering that is considered aesthetics and not perceived as a needed use. Member Kelly made a motion to accept the Water Rate Study and approve the recommended water rates for 1995 as presented in the report. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. 1995 RECYCLING CONTRACT AND RECYCLING UTILITY FEE DISCUSSED• RATES TO BE NEGOTIATED Recycling Coordinator Chandler presented the report of the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission on the 1995 Recycling Contract and Recycling Utility Fee. The report identified the following two factors affecting Edina's recycling program for 1995: Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy The County Board of Commissioners has 'adopted a policy for 1995 through 1999 which reduces the recycling funding from $1.75 per household per month to approximately $.80. This amounts to an annual reduction of $161,000 for Edina. Because the County's solid waste enterprise fund is shrinking due to recent court rulings against waste designation they have determined they tan no longer allocate money for recycling grants to cities. Instead, the County will simply pass through recycling funds received from the State of Minnesota. Since recycling program costs are now paid through the utility bill, it is anticipated that the funding reduction will necessitate a recycling utility rate increase. Edina- Woodlake Recycling Contract Edina's three -year recycling contract with Woodlake extends through 1995. The per household cost for 1995 is set at $1.96 for single family homes and $2.41 for townhomes, an 11 cent increase from 1994. Woodlake has submitted proposals which would allow the 1995 rate to .remain at the 1994 level or be reduced further if a contract extension is approved: The City also has the option to change to curbside pickup at a lower cost. Recycling Contract Options: #1. Retain the 1994 rate at $2.85 /month single family for garage service, contract thru December 1995. #2. Would involve a contract extension thru 1997: 1995 1996 1997 Single Family 2.55 2.85 3.01 Multi - family 2.13 2.43 2.59 #3. Would involve a contract extension thru 1997: 1995 1996 1997 Single Family, curbside 2.15 2.50 2.61 Multi- family, curbside 2.00 2.35 2.46 With contract extension a clause could be included that the rate for materials return would be reviewed on a yearly basis. Assuming Hennepin County funding of $.80 per household per month, the utility billing increase over 1994 for single family would be as follows: Option 41 - $2.70 per quarter; Option m2 - $1.80 per quarter; and Option #3 - $.60 per quarter. The Recycling and Solid Waste Commission agreed that each of the options would be less costly than the current contract terms. The Commission prioritized the options as•follows: First Choice: Option #3, curbside service Second Choice: Option #2, contract extension thru 1997 Third Choice: Option' #1, service at 1994 rate for 1995, contract thru December 31, 1995 Discussion followed by the Council Members on curbside versus garage side pickup with the majority not in support of curbside pickup. Member Smith made a motion that staff negotiate with Woodlake on.Option #2 to attempt to retain the 1996 rate of $2.85 single family and $2.43 for multi - family for year 1997 and report back to Council. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION HOUSING PROGRAMS ENDORSED Assistant Manager Hughes reviewed the history of the East Edina Housing Foundation (EEHF) created in 1984 in connection with the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes projects. The EEHF may operate in that portion of the City located east of Hansen Road and north of Interlachen Boulevard. Within this area, the EEHF is authorized to undertake a number of activities related to the provision of modest cost housing for persons of low and moderate income. The Foundation's assets total $5,426,105 as of December 30, 1993. Approximately $3,550,000 of these assets are in the form of second mortgage notes and accrued interest with respect to the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Development. Approximately $1,700,000 is in the ford of liquid investments which has. been used to fund second mortgage loans for new condominium buyers at Centennial Lakes and Edinborough. On April 9, 1994, the City Council met with the Board of Directors of. the EEHF for the purpose of reviewing a number of conceptual alternatives for future housing programs. At that meeting, the Council identified several objectives: 1. The program should focus on loans rather than grants. 2. The program should consider multi - family housing as well as single - family housing. 3. Partnering with a local lender would be desirable. 4. Programs involving down payment loans and down payment loans coupled with renovation loans would be desirable. 5. The program should not be limited to properties of less than $110,000 but a limit of $110,000 may be desirable. Based upon the direction received from the Council, the EEHF has developed and given approval to two programs: 1) Edina Community Home Buyer Program and, 2) Edina Home Partners. These programs are proposed to be offered in cooperation with Richfield Bank and Trust Company. If approved, staff would suggest that the relationship between the EEHF and Richfield Bank extend for a minimum of one year. Assistant Manager summarized the programs as follows: Edina Community Home Buyer Program Program Description - Down payment loans in tandem with FNMA first mortgages. Loan Terms - Deferred repayment, five points below first mortgage, secured with second mortgage. Eligible Properties - Owner occupied single family homes. Eligible Borrowers - Income at or below regional median. Asset limit may not exceed equivalent of six months in principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI). Maximum income regardless of family size is $51,000. Maximum Loan Amount - Two percent of purchase price plus closing costs. Processing - First mortgage lender processes EEHF loan and performs all servicing - functions. Edina Home Partners Progran Description - Home improvement loans in tandem with home purchase. Loan Terms - Deferred repayment, five points below first mortgage, secured with second mortgage. Eligible Properties - Owner occupied R -1 and R -2 homes. Eligible Borrowers - Income at or below 110% of regional median income. Asset limit may not exceed equivalent of six months PITI. Maximum Loan Amount — Lesser of 15 percent of first mortgage or $20,000. Eligible Costs - Basic repairs, i.e. energy efficiency improvements, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural exterior improvements, code compliance and accessibility or specialized improvements for persons with disabilities. Processing- Borrower must first qualify for maximum first mortgage loan. EEHF loan fills gap between first mortgage loan and total cost of purchase plus improvements. First mortgage lender processes EEHF loan and performs all servicing functions. Buyer Training - First time homeowners must receive training. Assistant Manager presented overheads illustrating examples of typical loans under each of the two programs. He pointed out that the second mortgage would be deferred while the owner lived in the home. If approved, Richfield Bank and Trust's role would be to service the second mortgage portfolio except the applications for these loans and do the processing. The City's role will be to. furnish the second mortgage funding and to lend the City's name in the promotion of the programs. Member Smith asked for clarification on the second mortgage interest and why there were no Edina banks offering the program. Assistant Manager Hughes explained that the interest rate of the EEHF loan will be calculated on a simple interest basis and not compounded. He said Richfield Bank and Trust does have an Edina office and the programs will be serviced out of that office. He added that he had contacted all other lenders in the City and Richfield Bank and Trust was the one that came forward to do the program. Member Paulus said she had a concern under the Edina Home Partners program about what would happen if the loan was refinanced. Assistant Manager Hughes explained that in the case of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes the EEHF will subordinate only to achieve, a lower interest rate and will not allow any cash to be taken out in connection with refinancing. He said he expected that the EEHF would apply that same policy to these programs. Member Rice asked how much has been written off since the inception of the EEHF. Assistant Manager Hughes said there have been five loans totaling approximately $50,000 with two loans in the state of foreclosure. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards commented that he felt the assets limitation of six months PITI is too severe but otherwise it was a good program. Member Smith said he concurred. Member Rice asked what other limitation could be applied. Mayor Richards said the programs have an income and monthly debt limitation which he felt would be sufficient. Further, he believed individuals should be encouraged to save money. He added that the programs will regenerate and create more money for first time home buyers or those wanting to do home improvements in conjunction with a home purchase. Member Smith made a motion to endorse the East Edina Housing Foundation housing programs as presented with the exception of possible modification of the asset limitation. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. I -494 COMMISSION RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AGREEMENT APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMMISSION MEMBERS WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission consists of the cities of Bloomington, Richfield, Edina, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Maple grove and Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has been chosen as the signatory on the Agency Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the I -494 Corridor Commission; WHEREAS, the Agency Agreement requires the City of Eden Prairie to indemnify and hold harmless Mn /DOT from and against certain claims or demands as set forth - therein; WHEREAS, the member cities of the Commission agree to share in any indemnification or liability under the Agency Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute the Agency Agreement on behalf of the City of Edina. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PROPOSED ANNEXATION BY MINNETONKA OF LAND PARCEL AT HIGHWAYS 62 AND 169 DISCUSSED: NO ACTION TAKEN Planner Larsen advised Council that Cellular One has applied for a variance to construct a 100 foot antenna tower near the northwest quadrant of Highways 62 and 1.69. The subject property is vacant but is part of the Data 100 development which is in the City of Minnetonka. The tower location, however, would be located on a parcel in Edina which was severed from mainline Edina when the highway was constructed some time ago. The applicant has applied for a variance from the 65 foot height restriction to construct this tower. Planner Larsen said if the applicant were to move the tower location further up the hill they could accept the height restriction and no variance would be required. Such proposed relocation would require removal of a lot of the existing trees on that hillside to provide a clear path for the signal. Staff has met with and discussed the proposed installation with Minnetonka officials. They have expressed their opposition to the proposal. The City of Minnetonka has asked that we consider a land trade or annexation so that they may control any development on this parcel. A logical land exchange between the two cities is not available, but an annexation of this parcel may make sense. The parcel is west of the freeway, is part of an existing development in Minnetonka and there is no access to the site from the City of Edina. Minnetonka staff has suggested the possibility of paying Edina its tax share on the parcel for 25 years. The property tax on the parcel is approximately $2,000 per year and Minnetonka has suggested a payment of $50,000 for the proposed annexation. There is a concern as to liability for the City of Edina relating to certain property rights that may disappear if the parse_ ,•ere annexed by Minnetonka. Edina would be discussing with Minnetonka tha: liability issue as to indemnifying Edina against any action that may result from this. If the Council is willing to consider the proposal staff would negotiate a package to bring back for Council consideration. Member Paulus asked who in Edina would be affected if control of this parcel were given up. Planner Larsen said in his opinion he did not believe there would be a negative impact on the City. Notwithstanding Minnetonka's position, if a tower were erected as proposed, it would be a pretty good location from Edina's point of view and would be less aesthetically displeasing than a prior tower proposal further to the north off of Lincoln Drive. Mayor Richards commented that the proposed annexation would be intrusive of government by taking away private property rights and he would not support such a a proposal. Member Kelly said she concurred with Mayor Richards. No formal action was taken on the proposed annexation. CONCERN EXPRESSED REGARDING COMPOST PILES AND ARCHERY TO CONTROL DEER POPUTATION William Basill, 5045 Windsor Avenue, said he was concerned about compost piles that are not turned over and in effect become nesting sites for rodents. He told Council his cat has been bringing home a lot of mice this summer and he had traced the source back to a compost pile that was not managed. He said before there are complaints about cats coming into yards the residents should be told to turn over their compost piles. In addition, he suggested a hold harmless area of 25/30 feet around compost piles. A second issue concerned the City's deer control program. He said he had appeared previously before Council when the program was discussed and approved. He had suggested the program be opened up to archers with a DNR permit limited to the Braemar Park Area. This has been done successfully in Blaine, Red Wing and a number of other cities. He suggested the Council think about this for next year. TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICE DISCUSSED The'Council discussed the form of notice that would be sent to property owners advising of proposed property taxes for 1995. Mayor Richards commented that it is misleading and does not tell the -real story. Staff was asked to research whether the form of notice could be reworded, if the City could include an information sheet with the notice and also the cost for placing a separate advertisement in the newspaper. CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 14, 1994 and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $367,659.12, C.D.B.G. $3,360.00, Communication $9,957.62, Working Capital $7,790.30, Art Center $7,160.39, Swimming Pool $1,087.02, Golf Course $40,026.06, Ice Arena $9,169.39, Gun Range $410.99, Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $25,586.16, Utility Fund $77,135.11, Storm Sewer $16,720.47, Recycling $39,841.19, Liquor Fund $76,425.32, Construction Fund $324,594.98, TOTAL $1,006,924.12; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 8, 1994 and consisting of 10 pages: General Fund $167,962.91, Golf Course $8,962.08, Ice Arena $16,706.00, Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $8,221.45, Liquor Fund $280,552.95, TOTAL $482,405.39. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. City Clerk A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL - NOVEMBER 7, 1994 RO Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. MINNESOTA D -DAY PROCLAIMED Notion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously for adoption of a Proclamation naming Thursday, November 17, 1994, as Minnesota D -Day (no smoking) in the City of Edina. Matthew Peterson and Douglas Lambert, Chair and Member respectively of the Community Health Services Advisory Committee, accepted the proclamation along with sixth grade students, Elizabeth Youngblood (Southview School) and Andy Bertram (Valley View School). Thanks were extended. to Tom Winn of FastFrame, Diana Hedges, Edina Art Center Director, and Pam Hermanson of the Edina Middle School for their efforts with the anti - tobacco poster project. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION Notion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously recognizing the Fairview Foundation as benefactor and expressing appreciation for its interest and contribution in sponsoring and promoting a healthier lifestyle for both students and adults whose lives are touched by the Anti - Tobacco. Poster Project. Mark Enger, accepted the resolution on behalf of the Fairview Foundation. MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCIAIMEID Notion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously for adoption of a Proclamation declaring November 10 - 18, 1994, as Minnesota Chemical Health Week in Minnesota. Kathy Iverson, Edina Chemical Awareness Committee Coordinator, accepted the Proclamation on behalf of the Committee and presented each Council Member with a red ribbon as a symbol of individual and community efforts to reduce the demand for drugs in the Edina community. *MINUTES OF REGUL&K MEETING OF OCTOBER 17 1994, APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 17, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 4 BLOCK 1 MARK DATnUIST ADDITION DENIED Presentation by Planner. Planner Larsen recalled that at its meeting of September 7, 1994, the Council continued the public hearing on the application for partial release of'the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition to allow the .proponent time to come back with a redesigned proposed home. He advised that Ron Clark, proponent, has returned with a proposal reflecting the exact footprint of a home proposed for Lot 4. The release would affect only those areas under the footprint of the dwelling. The proposed conservation restriction release for Lot 5 has been withdrawn by the proponent. Planner Larsen explained that the Findings have been revised to reflect comments by the Council at the September 7, 1994, Council hearing. The draft Findings contain two Decisions. The first F Decision would deny the application for release of 19 feet of the Conservation Restriction on Lot 4, and 23 feet of the Conservation Restriction on Lot 5. The second Decision would grant the release of' portions of the Conservation Restriction within the footprint area of the dwelling on Lot 4 as legally described in Exhibit A of the Findings. Presentation by Developer Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, introduced the proposed homeowner, Diane Dolginow and Michael Sharratt, the project architect. _,He presented a graphic illustrating the footprint presented on September 7, 1994, with an overlay of the new revised home footprint drawn to exact scale. Mr. Clark pointed out that on the revised footprint the home has been pulled back to 90 feet from the ordinary high water and the deck areas have been recessed into the home. He presented the following comparative of the previous home versus the new proposed home: Previous Proposed Interior heated space to within 81' of wetlands 450 SF Interior heated space to within 92' of wetlands 185 SF Elevated wood deck to within 81' of wetlands 240 SF Elevated wood deck to within 90' of wetlands 320 SF On grade patio (none shown on previous proposal) 0 SF On grade patio to within 90' of wetlands 185 SF Mr. Clark noted that most of the construction in the easement area constitutes on -grade patio and open deck. In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Clark answered that the proposed home would have 3,045 square feet on the first floor and would be a rambler with a full basement level walkout. The elevation from street level would be approximately 23 feet. Member Smith asked for clarification on the enclosed areas that would encroach on the conservation restriction. Mr. Clark pointed out that only about half of the two enclosed bays would encroach on the easement. Public Comment Ed Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, said he was opposed to the proposed plan and procedure. He said the Council is faced with a simple decision - should the City give away a valuable conservation easement, required by City ordinances, solely because the buyer of a one million dollar 6,000 square foot home wants two separate decks, a patio and an additional 185 square feet. He submitted that both the developer and buyer knew the lot restrictions before the proposed home was designed. Mr. Glickman said that the Findings state that construction of a home consistent with the neighborhood is not possible without the release of the conservation easement. Also, the conservation easement presents a functional building which would be in keeping with the size and scale of existing dwellings in the neighborhood. Further, denial of the release will adversely impact the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. He stated that none of these reasons stands the test of logic. The developer and architect have just shown that a 6,000 square foot functional home could be built on this lot that does not encroach on the conservation easement. As alternatives, Mr. Glickman submitted: 1) that the home be decreased in size by three percent which would not require release of the conservation easement, or 2) consideration be given to side deck placement, or 3) why not consider placing this home on one of the three remaining lots which are substantially larger. Failing all this, he suggested that Mr. Clark carve the subdivision into three lots rather than four. Finally, the Findings also include a statement that the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan are served by releasing this conservation easement. He noted that in the Comprehensive Plan it states that the City must protect and manage wetlands for stormwater retention areas, wildlife areas, amenities and lessen the impacts of nutrients and sediment input. Mr. Glickman reminded Council of the letter from the DNR two years ago in which it was stated that the property in question lies in an environmentally sensitive area and involves significant wetland and floodplain encroachment issues. The DNR was concerned about the effect of stormwater runoff on water quality of the wetlands. He presented recent photos showing a historic high water level on Mirror Lakes with 20" trees under water. He attributed this to an extraordinary amount of development which has gone on in the surrounding area. Mr. Glickman urged the Council not to give away an important conservation easement. Ted Pier, 5021 Ridge Road, asked the Council to provide and enforce a single, consistent law to all residents and citizens of Edina. He said that when Mr. Clark submitted his plan for subdivision of this property a stipulation of the Council was that there be no variances from the City's own regulations. Mr. Pier said the wording has been changed to make it appear that this is not a variance but a release of a conservation easement. Records leading to the decision to grant approval of the subdivision indicate that the issues raised dealt specifically with. the conservation easement. It was the Council's judgement at that time that no alterations should be allowed for this developer or for any of the other neighbors. He said that the Council should give the same consideration to this request for variance as was given to area neighbors when they applied for variances in the past and were denied. Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, stated she opposed granting a variance for any building in this subdivision. She said when they proposed to add a screen porch they were told that they could not ask for a variance and therefore redesigned it to comply with City regulations. She referred to the history of this subdivision and the agreement that there would be no. variances. Ms. Robinson said she believed Mr. Clark should be held responsible for his mistake and stay within the guidelines of the City instead of hoping to break the code and use this possibly as a precedent for future lot development in the area. If Council wants to look at the option of a 50 feet conservation easement, she suggested that the Council call a moratorium and set a public hearing on the issue, but as the law stands now, it is 100 feet. Helen McClelland, 5717 Continental Drive, explained the rationale used by the Planning Commission in considering variances by relating briefly three previous similar variance proposals that were denied. Because Mr. Clark is a professional developer and is aware of the laws regarding the development process, both the state and local rules, a plea of hardship would clearly be self- imposed. A comment following a Planning Commission meeting that the•Dalquist Addition was again before the Council raised some concern and three Commission members attended the Council meeting of September 19, 1994. Ms. McClelland said their concern was that issues are presented to the Planning Commission in one way and to Council in another. She recalled that from May to December 1992, Mr. Clark was closely'questioned by members of the Planning Commission about his plans for this site. He answered that any construction would have to maintain whatever conservation easement was granted to the lot and would have to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. At the meeting of October 29, 1992, a straw vote of the Planning Commission indicated that a one plus three lot subdivision was favored (5 to 2 vote). A subsequent poll by the Planning Commission for a four lot subdivision with no variances was seven to zero. When Mr. Clark returned at the December, 1992, Planning Commission meeting he presented a one plus four lot subdivision that was accomplished by moving the storm sewer line. At that meeting Mr. Clark was questioned extensively about whether there would be the need for variances and it was made clear that the Commission was giAring consideration' to the proposed subdivision without variances. The vote by the Planning Commission was eight to three for the one plus four lot subdivision with no variances. Ms. McClelland concluded that the Planning Commission does have concern that Mr. Clark is now asking for a variance to the conservation restriction. Patrick Mantyh, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, said he would like to reiterate what his neighbors and the Planning Commission member have just said. He stated that the neighbors have significant mistrust of what Mr. Clark says as he gave his word when the subdivision was approved that there would be no variances and everyone thought the matter was resolved. This issue is like a moving target as Mr. Clark has come back repeatedly with variance requests. Mr. Mantyh submitted that the land is not worthless without the variances as the lot is adequate to build a very large home. He asked that the laws be applied equally and fairly to all citizens of Edina and that the variance be denied. Corky Carlson,5025 Ridge Road, said she was a new resident to Edina and urged that the rules and laws be followed. John MacNeil, 5017 Schaefer Road, told Council he was also speaking for his children that live at 5125 Schaefer Road. He said he wished the Council would make the decision to stay with the City standards so that the residents not need keep coming back for the three additional lots that remain. Secondly, he questioned why the developer has never considered moving the home closer to the street. Thirdly, he voiced concern regarding the current level of the area lakes. He said something is wrong in that area as over the past several months the water is rising higher every week. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked Engineer Hoffman to comment on the lake level. He agreed that the water level in Mirror Lakes and the.two ponds to the northwest is much higher than two years ago. They are landlocked so the water level cannot be pumped down. Staff has looked at them and the DNR has come out and said the water is two feet higher than normal even though nothing new has happened in that immediate area. Mr. Clark responded that they have worked very hard to reduce the size of the dwelling and as now proposed it would be 200 SF smaller than the previously proposed home. He told Council that the problem is that 64 percent of the buildable lot area is within the conservation easement. He reminded Council that the Department of Natural Resources guideline for pond.. setback is 50. feet - the proposed dwelling footprint would be at 90 feet. Mr. Clark said the development has been thoroughly engineered with the basement floors proposed at 942 feet above sea level to provide a safety factor from high water. In addition, they have paid for installation of an equalizing pipe between the two ponds with any overflow to drain into a catch basin by Schaefer Road. For emergency situations, a line has been installed over the hill towards Interlachen whereby water can be pumped into Mirror Lakes. Engineer Hoffman clarified that Mr. Clark was required to install a forced main as opposed to a gravity pipe. Further, that the two ponds within the proposed development have no bearing on the water level of Mirror Lakes. Lisa Finsness, 4530 Tower Street, said it is her understanding that lakes are connected, maybe not by human means, but are fed from underground. Council Comment /Action Member Paulus recalled difficult decisions on minute footages when she sat on the Planning Commission and served on the Board of Appeals. Variances may establish precedents and it is important that they not be granted easily. Variances are granted for a true hardship that is not self- induced. During the whole process with the Mark Dalquist Addition, she remembered the proponent stating that he could live with the terms. In her opinion, this is a question of economic feasibility as she'felt a house can go on that lot without any variances. With regard to the DNR guideline for setback from ponds, the City does have the privilege of being more restrictive. Member Paulus said she could not support the requested release of the conservation restriction because she could see no hardship that was not self imposed. Member Smith said when he visited the site his understanding was that the proposed protrusion into the conservation restriction would be deck areas and not enclosed living space. He added that 185 SF interior space against a 6,000 SF home does not make the case for the requested release. Decks would be more malleable than concrete patios or living space. Member Smith said in looking at the building footprint available he felt it.could.be done without any release. He said he did not recall voting on a square footage variance previously but on a request to release a band of the restriction which he did not support and had suggested if the developer needed a variance for a smaller part of the footprint to come back with it. Now, in addition to decks, the request is for part of the house with roof and foundation and,he would have to say no to the proposal as presented. Member Rice said this is a situation that cries out for common sense and he would support the proposal. He asked what would be the infringement percentage of the footprint as proposed. Planner Larsen answered that the, conservation easement is approximately 21,000 SF and this would be an encroachment of approximately three percent. Member Rice then made general comments as follows. Over the past many months while this subdivision was being considered a line has been drawn in the sand between the neighbors and the developer. Threats of going to court have been suggested. People have said there ought to be a book and whatever the book says should be done, with no exceptions. If that were the case, there would be no need for a Council and a Planning Commission. The Council is elected to exercise reasonable judgement and many have differences of opinion as is evident. Member Rice said he believed the home as proposed would not be a detriment to the community, the environment or to any naturally sensitive areas. To hold Mr. Clark,to 100 percent compliance, in his opinion, is not reasonable. What Mr. Clark is asking for is a release of portions of the conservation restriction that has been placed on the subdivision by the Council and is within the jurisdiction of the Council to release. Member Rice concluded that common sense says, this is a reasonable proposal and he would support the request. Ron Clark commented that he was at a total loss as to the Council's intent when the previous request for release of the conservation restriction was denied. He believed his marching orders were to go back and finalize the plan, in keeping with the percentage of encroachment into the easement area by the previous footprint. Mr. Clark argued that the footprint now presented has much less encroachment. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly interjected that it was her understanding as well that Mr. Clark come back with a design footprint that would not encroach on the conservation easement except for decks and not heated areas. Member Smith said he thought it was made clear that the Council would look at some intrusion if it were for decks. Member Paulus made a motion to deny the request for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4 Block 1, Dalquist Addition as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Nays: Rice Motion carried. *APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION FOR 35 FOOT ANTENNA HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN NORTHQEST OUADRANT OF HIGHVAYS 169 AND 62 INTERSECTION RESOLVED BY WITHDRAVAL OF VARIANCE REQUEST Motion vas made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to accept the withdrawal of the request for a 35 foot antenna height variance for property generally located in the northwest quadrant of highways 169 and 62 intersection by the City of Minnetonka, thereby resolving the appeal of Board of Appeals Decision. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD: ONE AND ONE -HALF FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE GRANTED FOR 4223 GRILLES AVEN[TE Presentation by Associate Planner Associate Planner Aaker reported that the subject property is located on the east side of Grimes Avenue, south of West 42nd Street and north of Morningside Road. The property consists of a one story rambler built in 1913, according to residential property assessing records, with a detached two car garage on a 50 by 199 foot lot. The homeowner is proposing to expand the house into the rear yard area to allow for a larger bathroom and expanded kitchen and dining area. The expansion would conform to all ordinance requiremhnts with the exception of the north side yard setback of 3.5 feet. The applicant is hoping to match the existing non- conforming 3.4 foot sideyard setback. The home has experienced few improvements since its construction. In 1979, a 22 by 24 foot detached garage was constructed and in 1982 an addition to the front of the house was accomplished. On October 6, 1994, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and approved Peter V. Hall's request for a 1.5 foot sideyard setback variance to allow expansion of the north building wall of the home at 4223 Grimes Avenue to. accomplish an expanded bathroom. The proponent had reduced his original request and is now hoping to fill in the back, northeast corner of the home as approved by the Board. The most affected property is to the north and consists of a two story home that is located in front of the subject home. The north adjacent property also includes a driveway to access a detached garage in the rear yard. The area located between the neighboring house and the subject home is generous at roughly 20 feet and it will probably remain unchanged. The new addition would extend to be within 6.5 feet of the neighbor's garage and would only allow limited maneuverability between structures. The Board's decision is being appealed by Joseph R. Chisler and Deborah Mangham, 4219 Grimes Avenue, and Lucille E. Chisler, 4221 Grimes Avenue. Public Comment Joseph Chisler, 4219 Grimes Avenue, stated he was also representing his mother who lives at 4221 Grimes Avenue. He showed slides in support of his opposition to the granting of the variance and raised the following issues: 1) does not understand the hardship aspect when there is 24 buildable feet on the south side, 2) the subject home is perhaps the longest and narrowest in Edina, runs nearly the length of the property, and provides them with very little privacy, 4) concern that a mature tamarack tree will be seriously affected by the proposed construction, 5) the existing home offers no architectural relief. Dr. Deborah Mangham, 4219 Grimes Avenue, told Council that the owner of 4221 Grimes Avenue is 84 years old, in failing health, lives in a nursing home and will not be returning. They intend to buy her home and improve the property including a new garage. The addition proposed by Mr. Hall will affect their plan and they are opposing the Board's decision for basically three reasons: 1) there is room to expand to the south, 2) the house is aesthetically unpleasing, and 3) the closeness of the expansion will decrease their property value. Peter V. Hall, 4223 Grimes Avenue. -;fated he owned the subject property. He S pointed out that the requested expansion requiring the 1.5 foot sideyard variance would not extend beyond the existing north wall of the house. Mr. Hall said he would do what he reasonably could to protect the neighbor's tamarack tree and intended to only construct a four foot frost foundation. Concerning expanding the house to the south, he explained that would not be economical for a house that is 80 years old with its current internal design.. Also, the plumbing core wall would have to be moved. He stated that he intended to replace the shed/hip roof with a gable roof to provide some architectural relief, would install a window on the north side so it would appear more unified than the house presently does and would use matching materials. Also speaking in support of the requested variance were Helen Stafford, 4226 Grimes Avenue, and Ray Hall, 4230 Grimes Avenue. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly noted that Council had received copies'of previous correspondence regarding the variance request in addition to a letter dated November 7, 1994, from Charles Wm. James, 2715 Maplewood Circle West, Wayzata, former owner of the subject property. Council Comment /Action Member Paulus observed that the Zoning Board of Appeals had placed a great deal of value in the fact that this is an older, non - conforming home with a bathroom that does not meet code. She commented that when the owner purchased the property he must have understood it did not have a conforming bathroom. In listening to comments of the owner, he mentioned that it would be more economical to expand the bathroom on the north side. Member Paulus said for that reason she would be swayed to deny the variance. Member Rice said that upon inspecting the property it evidenced great pride of ownership now. He observed that•non- conforming properties like this one are unique and always difficult and may require more forbearance. In his opinion, the requested variance is minimal and would have little effect on the adjacent property or that of Mr. Chisler's. Member Bice made a motion to uphold the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to approve a 1.5 foot sideyard setback variance. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Smith commented that he could support the variance request because there is no house located immediately adjacent to the proposed addition. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she viewed the. owner's comment regarding economics as more of a hardship because the design of the house warrants the bathroom's location on the north. Also, the house is proposed to be extended only along the existing plane of the structure. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she felt owners should be encouraged to bring homes up to code and would support the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Rice, Smith, Kelly Nays: Paulus Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AMENDING YEAR %VIII CDBG ALLOCATIONS Planner Larsen explained that Hennepin County requires all Year RVIII CDBG funds to be expended by December 31, 1994. Currently, $1,398.63 remains uncommitted in the Adaptive Recreation budget. Funds not expended revert back to the County. Staff would recommend reprogramming the funds for Adaptive Recreation into the Handicap Accessibility Project where the funds will be expended by the end of the year. Member Smith made a motion for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING REpROGRANKrNG OF YEAR %VIII FUNDS URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has determined the necessity to reprogram Year %VIII Funds from the Adaptive Recreation Program to the Handicap Accessibility Program, and held a public hearing on November 7, 1994, to obtain the views of citizens on the reprogramming of said funds. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Edina approved the following reprogramming of funding from the Year %VIII Urban Hennepin County Community Block Grant program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the Year %VIII Urban Hennepin County Block Grant Program: $1,398.63 from ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM #53044 to HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAM #53046, ADOPTED this 7th day of November, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. *AMENDEp ':AL PLAT RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR MUIR WOODS FOURTH ADDITION (LOT 5 BLOCK 1 k4UJER WOODS) PREVIOUSLY NAMED CUNNINGHAM ADDITION Motion was made by Member Smith and.vas seconded by Member Rice to for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT, FOR MUIR WOODS FOURTH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "MUIR WOODS FOURTH ADDITION ", platted by Robert T. Griffith, a single individual, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 7, 1994, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. 1L vluilvua rlaCl'. VVLr..7 asma�aaaa. r - - -- — Presentation by Fire Chief Fire Chief Paulfranz advised that the purpose of amending Code Section 605 is to update the current fire code ordinance. At the Council meeting of September 7, 1994, staff was requested to provide additional information on the content and detail of the actual code changes. Three documents outline and define the changes between the current code (1988) and (1991) proposed code: 1. 1991 Minnesota.Uniform Fire Code 2. Statement of Need and Reasonableness - Adoption of State Fire Code 3. Analysis of Code changes - Uniform Fire Code 1988 to 1991 Why a New Fire Code? 1. To maintain current standards and regulations for fire equipment, building hazards and processes. 2. Clarify local authority for enforcement of State Fire Code. 3. Preserve ability to amend State Code in areas of local concern. .4. Maintain continuity with enforcement of previously adopted local regulations. Why All the Changes in the New Code? The majority of changes between 1988 and 1991 are editorial and format changes, necessary to provide code enforcement officials with a model code that: 1. Provides a consistent format from one article to the next. 2. Provides better correlation with companion Uniform Building Code. 3. Clarifies troublesome language and provides more consistent r interpretation /application. Inconsistencies become a source of complaint on a local, state and national level. What Are the Options If We Choose Not to Adopt the New Code? If we do not adopt a new Fire Code, we have the following options: 1. Withdrawing local inspection program and supporting State Fire Marshal's efforts in enforcement of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. Absent State inspection resources would result in no inspection /code enforcement program. 2. Write own code producing a document equal to or.better than 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code and State Amendments. This option would be subject to challenge any time objections were heard to a specific requirement as well as its relationship to the State - adopted code. 3. Enforce State Code as the minimum Fire Code, without local adoption. This clouds the issue of local authority and interpretation. What Might Be the Major Issues For the City of Edina? The new code primarily impacts the areas of flammable liquids and hazardous materials storage and handling. From a local perspective, historic issues of concern are as follows: 1. Automatic Sprinklers - The Fire Code does not regulate sprinkler installations... The Building code with local amendments requires sprinklers in new, remodeled and improved properties. 2. Barbecue /Apartment Buildings - Would not change provisions adopted in 1988 Fire Code. Barbecue requirements have been moved from the body of the State Code to an appendix chapter which is recommended for adoption. 3. Fire Lanes - On private property the proposed language would be less restrictive in placement of signs and should reduce adverse impact on property owners. 4. Open Burning - State requirements have been modified. This is the result of recent DNR requirements regulating and permitting open burning under statutory authority. Language has been written restricting open burning except for specific circumstances allowed under permit. The proposed process has been reviewed by the City Attorney and the State Department of Natural Resources. 5. Existing Buildings - The Fire Code provides regulation of existing buildings when such buildings become a fire hazard. Appendix 1 -A (MUFC -1991 Edition) outlines these regulations. Staff recommends re- adoption of this Appendix Chapter with provisions currently under City Ordinance. Member Rice moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 1994 -9 - An Ordinance Amending Code Section 605 to Provide Updates to Various Fire Codes, as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly First Reading Granted. *BID AWARDED FOR BITUMINOUS ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. E -34 Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for bituminous.alley' improvement No. E -34 to recommended low bidder, DMJ Corporation, at $21,179.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. - *BID AWARDED FOR EDMA AQUATIC CENTER CONCRETE DECK E%PANSION Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for concrete deck expansion for the Edina Aquatic Center to recommended low bidder, USAquatics, at $14,888.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PARTIAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM - VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND WEST 66TH STREET Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for partial traffic signal system at valley View Road and West 66th Street to recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation, at $56,500.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1 1994 APPROVED_ Traffic Coordinator Swanson reported that under Section A(1) of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of November 1, 1994, - Request for STOP signs on Townes Road at Townes Circle - staff discussed the-volume, accident history and geometries of Townes Road and several suggestions offered by area residents. David Nelson, 4701 Townes Road, spoke to his letter of October 1, 1994, which included photos of the accident site on his property and the signatures of approximately 42 area residents. Charlie Lamb, 4700 Townes Road,, and Ron Rasley, 4701 Townes Road, spoke of the necessity of slowing speeds and installation of STOP signs rather than curve signs. After a brief discussion, staff was directed to examine vegetation on the northeast quadrant of Townes Road and Townes Circle for compliance with the clear -view ordinance of both private and public property owners. Member Paulus made a motion, seconded by Member Smith, to approve the following actions as recommended in Section A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of November 1, 1994: 1. a) Installation of curve signs at appropriate locations along Townes Road. b) An advisory 15 MPH sign added to the curve sign. c) Enforcement of "Clear View" ordinance at-northeast quadrant of Townes Road and Townes Circle. d) Neighborhood be advised of the petition process for additional street lighting. e) Review of issue in three months. f) Enforcement of "Clear View" ordinance immediately on City property in area. 2. Installation of a Reverse Curve sign with an attached 20 MPH advisory sign at 5717 Melody Lane; 3. Add additional signage.to highlight to drivers that the traveled portion of the roadway narrows for eastbound R. 70th Street east of TH 100; 4. Relocate the pedestrian crosswalk at W. 49 1/2 Street at Halifax Avenue when weather permits during Spring 1995. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. Section B.4 Request for STOP signs on Benton Avenue at Johnson Drive. Coordinator Swanson said that this request has been made several times in the past and has been denied. The request cites the potential for vehicles to leave the roadway west of Johnson Drive and conflict with pedestrians that use the sidewalk. This sidewalk is a route by school children to Countryside School. Bollards and chains have been installed in the past to protect the sidewalk area. Benton Avenue is a collector roadway with a very low volume of traffic intersecting it at the "T" intersection with Johnson Drive. Stopping a collector roadway at such an intersection would lead to many vehicles ignoring the sign and potentially creating a false sense of security. STOP signs may also create accidents due to a curving down grade that may create a difficult stopping condition during inclement weather. The area is well marked with warning signs and advisory speed signs. West of the bollards and chains, the roadway has a "roll -up" curb. The City Engineer recommends a 10 inch curb could be installed that would stop vehicles if they leave the roadway, endangering pedestrians on the sidewalk, similar to Browndale Avenue at Bridge area. Staff recommended denial of the STOP sign request. Staff further recommended that s 10 -inch curb be installed on Benton Avenue west of Johnson Drive. Rick Danmeier, 5600 Benton Avenue, spoke to his letter and requezted further review of the STOP sign request on Benton Avenue at Johnson Drive. Concerns listed in his letter were: 1) Cars drive wrong way down a one -way street. 2) Although speed is posted at 20 MPH, few cars drive this area at that speed. 3) School area - Kids ride bikes and wear roller blades and have no protection from speeding cars. 4) Bollards and chains protect the corner of Johnson and Benton only. 5) Many cars roll up onto sidewalk due to excessive speed. 6) Mail box has been knocked over, cars have been towed out of yards, all from too much speed for area. 7) When doing yard work or talking to neighbors, people have to step off sidewalk over safety concerns with cars going too fast or rolling onto walk or yard. Mr. Danmeier said he and his neighbors concur with installation of the 10 -inch curb but would like more protection for the children in the neighborhood by slowing the traffic down. Member Paulus said that a false sense of security is given with the installation of STOP signs because the compliance rate is low and she would have to rely on staff's recommendation because they have the technical knowledge. Coordinator Swanson interjected that when Officer Tom Johnson brought this issue to the attention of Traffic Safety staff last May, he cited it was difficult to drive the subject road at 30 MPH. The Police cannot tag drivers for driving under 30 MPH in a 30 MPH zone unless there are existing special conditions that would warrant a lower speed, whereas a tag could be issued for violation of a STOP sign. If a Police squad were positioned at Johnson Drive there would be speed compliance for the short term period the squad was there. Some discussion followed concerning inability of cities to designate special areas at speeds lower than the statutory 30 MPH. Also speaking in support of reducing speeds were Brad Teslow, 4128 West 62nd Street, and Barb Hodne, 4532 Tower Street. Member Rice made a motion for installation of a 10 -inch curb on Benton Avenue west of Johnson Drive and a STOP sign on Benton Avenue at Johnson Drive. Mayor Pro -tem Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Rice, Kelly Nays: Paulus, Smith Motion failed. Member Paulus made a motion to acknowledge and accept Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 1, 1994. Member Rice seconded the motion. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Nays: Smith Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON VEHICLE DAMAGE AT PENTAGON PARK SEPTEMBER 7. 1994 Assistant to the City Manager Smith recalled that when the issue of vehicle damage was brought to the Council on October 3, 1994, staff was instructed to contact an independent testing agency to determine if the substance on the vehicles was the result of the City's street milling process. Braun Intertec Corporation was contacted to conduct the testing. By letters dated November 4, 1994, from Steven Talafous, Senior Engineer, and October 24, 1994, from Thomas Hallquist, Chemistry Supervisor., both at Braun Intertec, they advised that the results of the testing indicated that the milling process was not the source of the gluing agent for the stain on the vehicles. Therefore, staff would make the following recommendations: 1. That Council take no action regarding this matter. 2. That staff should refer this issue back to the City's insurer, the St. Paul Companies. 3. That all claims of damage should be referred back to the St. Paul Companies for further analysis. John Noren, 4640 West 77th Street, asked for a copy of the report and stated his objection to the opinion of Braun Intertec that the milling process was not the source of the substance that adhered to his vehicle. He also indicated his displeasure with the treatment he received from the St. Paul Companies. Member Rice made a motion that this issue of vehicle damage be referred back to the City's insurer, the St. Paul Companies. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus., Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. PUBLIC EFARTNG HELD• INCREASE IN BEER AND WIPE LICENSE FEES FOR 1995 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted to consider increasing the fees for beer and wine licenses in accordance with M.S. 340A.408u, Subd. 3A. Manager Rosland reported that a copy of the notice was mailed to all licensees on October 3, 1994.. The increase is proposed to recover the additional cost for staff time in the issuance of inspections by the Police Department and the issuance of licenses. No comment or correspondence has been received from holders of beer or wine licenses. Mayor Pro -tem called for public comment on the proposed license fee increase. No public comment or objection was heard. Member Rice made a motion to approve the following beer and wine license fees, effective January 1995, to be adopted by ordinance: On -Sale Wine: Restaurants with 50 or fever seats $720. 51 - 100 seats (inclusive) 785 100 - 150 seats (inclusive) 850 Over 150 seats 905 Manager's License 65 On -Sale 3.2 Beer: $220 (renewal) 280 (new) Off -Sale 3.2 Beer $220 (renewal) 280 (new) Temporary 3.2 Beer License $ 45 Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS ODOR REDUCTION. Building Coordinator Kehoe reminded Council that at the meeting of October 17, 1994, staff was instructed to have Golden Valley Microwave Foods, 7450 Metro Boulevard, submit a report on actions taken to resolve the odor from their food plant. Lisa Thompson, stated that she was the attorney for Golden Valley Microwave Foods, and introduced Maintenance Manager Mike Wallis, Operations Manager Mike Bley and Carl Braun of Rust Environmental. Carl Braun, Senior Air Quality.Engineer with Rust Environmental, explained his background in design of dust and ventilation equipment and application of air pollution control equipment. He said.the odor problem is being approached as follows: Phase 1 (nearly completed) The source of the odor has been identified, and they are progressing towards application of control technology. Phase 2 Development of detailed engineering to implement that technology. Some preliminary work remains to evaluate more precisely that technology. Phase 3 Installation of the technology and final evaluation. Member Paulus asked what time period it will take to accomplish all this. Mr. Braun answered that March, 1995 seems realistic for a completion date of all three phases. Success with a system like this will take fine - tuning but should show an appreciable change right away. Taking the time to do the job completely is a goal of Golden Valley Microwave Foods. Member Smith voiced concern that the installation will take as long as indicated. He said he was.an advocate of letting Golden Valley solve their own problem before calling in outside troops and had thought his home was far enough distance that the odor would not be a concern of his. However, the odor prohibits him from enjoying his home and yard. Member Smith said a schedule to correct the problem must be set and submitted to the Council, adhered to and the problem resolved as soon as possible. Member Rice commented that the operative words here are: serious odor problem, public nuisance, uncomfortable to persons of ordinary sensibilities, and that he felt 12 months from the time this problem was identified is not-an appropriate timeframe to correct the problem. If it smells and is a problem for residents, it needs resolving here or in a court of law. Mayor Pro -tem Kelly said the timetable is too open and reminded them they..had received a citation in June and it is now November. She reiterated that Council wants an exact timetable in writing and periodic reports back to Council as to progress. Mike Bley, Operations Manager, said a specific timetable would be submitted in writing. When the custom made equipment can be acquired it would be installed immediately. Member Rice made a motion directing Golden Valley Microwave Foods to present an exact timetable for eliminating the odor at 7450 Metro Boulevard on'November 21, 1994, and upon Council approval to notify residents in the area. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED RECOIGU LADING SALE OF TAX FORFEIT LAND TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ONLY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said maaicipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non- payment of property taxes, which said list was dated October 27, 1994, Non- Conservation List 844 -NC: and WHEREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PINS No. 04- 116 -21 -32 -0023 has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin ., County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof and has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners: WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no existing or pending special assessments on said parcel; WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that said parcel need not be withheld from sale pursuant to H.S. 85.012; M.S. 92.461; H.S. 282.01, Subd 8.; H.S. 282.018, Subd. 1; or H.S. 282.018, Subd. 2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said classification is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282.01, Subd. 7a, it has determined that said parcel of land is not buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance and that sale of said parcel be limited to the adjacent property owner (6624 Naomi Drive) for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 7th day of November, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *1995 COUNCIL MEETING DATES SET Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice setting 1995 Council Meeting Dates as follows because of observed holidays: January Tuesday, January 3 Tuesday, January 17 February Monday, February 6 Tuesday, February 21 September Tuesday, September 5 Monday, September 18 December Monday, December 4 Tuesday, December 19 Motion carried on tollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE SET OF DECEMBER 5 0 1994 FOR VACATION OF UTILITY/DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON LOT 6 BLOCK 9 SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES 3RD ADDITION (7120 WEST SHORE DRIVE) Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT UTILITY/DRAINAGE PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined after receipt of the petition of the owner of the land affected thereby that the following described easement for utility and drainage purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: The southern 5 feet of Lot 6, Block 9, SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first lrablication at least 14 days prior'to the date of such hearing, and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following fora: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING op ON VACATION OF UTILITY/DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 hest 50th Street on December 5, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following utility and drainage easement: The southern 5 feet of Lot 6, Block 9, SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time.and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone, or cable poles and lines, gas and sever lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 21 1994 SET FOR POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG AT 5239 WEST HIGHWOOD DRIVE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice setting a hearing date of November 21, 1994, for determination of a potentially dangerous dog at 5239 West Highwood Drive. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. 1995 RECYCLING CONTRACT APPROVED Manager Rosland reminded Council that at the meeting of October 17, 1994, Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. was asked to consider a rate for 1997 in keeping with the proposed 1996 price. Tom Moline, of Woodlake Sanitary, said to keep the rates the same for 1997 they would need to work with a benchmark of commodity values. Recycling Coordinator Chandler explained that the proposal from Woodlake Sanitary Service offers a 1997 monthly household rate of $2.85, contingent upon the market value of recyclables reaching an average of $25.00 per ton. If the market value is less than $25.00 per ton, the rate would increase by a pro -rated amount, not to exceed $3.01 per month - the rate proposed for 1997 in the Woodlake letter of - September 14, 1994. The 1995 and 1996 rates are the same as the previous proposal. In comparison, the City is currently paying $1.85 per month for recycling service. Member Paulus made a motion approving the Recycling Contract extension Option #2 with Woodlake Sanitary Service through 1997, with the new rate structure as follows: 1995 1996 1997 Single Family $2.55 $2.85 $2.85 Multi- Family 2.13 2.43 2.43 Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING NOTICE APPROVED Assistant Manager Hughes reminded Council that at the meeting of October 3, 1994, Council reviewed a draft advertisement which was intended to accompany the required Truth in Taxation advertisement. He presented a revision of that advertisement in accordance with the Council's direction. Staff would recommend publishing the advertisement and the-Notice on.November 16 and November 23, 1994, in the Edina Sun - Current. Member.Rice made a motion approving the Truth in Taxation notice and advertisement as presented to be published in the Edina Sun - Current on November 16 and November 23, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. *PETITION FOR SIDEWALK AT 4701 TO 4711 WEST 70TH STREET REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member. Rice to refer the petition for sidewalk from 4701 to 4711 West 70th Street to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PETITION FOR 4-WAY STOP INTERSECTION AT BIRCHCREST DRIVE /CODE AVENUE REFERRED TO TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF FOR RECOMKENDATION Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to refer the petition for a 4 -Way STOP Intersection at Birchcrest Drive and Code Avenue to the Traffic Safety staff for recommendation. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN VOICED REGARDING ST JOHNS AVENUE/WEST WOODLAND ROAD INTERSECTION: PUBLIC HE RImG SET FOR NOVEMBER 21 1994 TO CONSIDER 4 -WAY STOP AT ST. JOHNS AVENUE AND WOODLAND ROAD Barb Hodne, 4532 Tower Street and Lisa Finsness, 4536 Tower Street, said that they were representing their neighborhood and stated that the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and West Woodland Road is unsafe for.the neighborhood and the community when driving through. Ms. Hodne said the concern is not speed but the design which provides poor visibility at the intersection and makes it especially dangerous for children riding bicycles. She pointed out the proximity to Southview Middle School, Concord Elementary, the Normandale School, the Community Center and the athletic fields.and said the uncontrolled intersection is the main avenue to those locations. Initially, their request was for STOP signs on St. Johns Avenue, but the Traffic Safety Committee informed them that installation of STOP signs on St. Johns would make West Woodland a thoroughfare. Ms. Hodne said they are now requesting a 4 -way STOP at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue /West Woodland Road. In addition, three driveways back out into that intersection. She urged the Council to make this intersection safe. Lisa Finsness commented that the traffic now has actually doubled from earlier, traffic counts.which they believe is because of the new entrance to Southview Middle School from Woodland Road. She'said Traffic Safety Coordinator Swanson had told her that he had observed cars driving at speeds too fast for that area because of the road alignment. Ms. Finsness noted that visibility is also poor because of shrubbery at the intersection. Manager Rosland interjected that Council is concerned that everyone that would be affected by the proposed 4 -way STOP knows what is happening and suggested that a public hearing be scheduled. Member Smith made a motion setting November 21, 1994, as hearing date to consider the proposed 4 -way STOP at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and West Woodland Road. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly. Motion carried. CLAIM PAID Member Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 3, 1994, and consisting of 36 pages: General Find $366,261.53; C.D.B.G. $19.50; Communication $8,823.73; Working Capital $10,110.46; Art Center $13,348.06; Swimming Pool $3,506.22; Golf Course $31,886.87; Ice Arena $11,512.41; Gun Range $518.55; Edinborough /Centennial Ickes $13,765.12; Utility Fund $298,092.75; Storm Sewer $5,245.92; Liquor Fund $105,710.29; Construction Fund $7,722.24; TOTAL $876,523.65. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Pro -tem Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 11:50 P.M. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGUI&R MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 21, 1994 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:02 P.M. after adoption of the Consent Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC BEARING CONDUCTED: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -95 APPROVED FOR SOUTEF.AST AREA OF CITY Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Park Director Director Keprios advised that, basically, the City is on a six year trimming plan for the approximately 11,000 boulevard trees in Edina. He explained that the tree trimming project would propose to trim boulevard trees in the southeast part of Edina comprising an area bounded by Highway 100 on the west, Golf Terrace and West 54th Street on the north, the eastern City boundary line on the east and the southern City boundary line on the south. In this area there are approximately 1,122 trees to be trimmed with size and cost as follows: 607 trees 12 inches and under in diameter at breast height (dhb) $ 5,390.16 515 trees over 12 inches in diameter at breast height (dhb) 24:916.00 Total Tree Trimming Contract _ $30,316.16 Plus clerical /administrative fees (12% of total) �� 3.637.94 TOTAL PROJECT COST $33,954.10 Recommended assessment for clerical /administrative costs on a per tree basis (assuming 1,122 trees) is $3.24 per tree. Examples of costs per tree: Size Tree Cost /Inch Trimming Cost Admin. Fee Total 10" tree $1.11 $11.10 $3.24 $14.34 14" tree 2.42 33.88 3.24 37.12 Public Comment Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, asked if trees due for trimming would be on a master list again as in the past. Director Keprios responded that residents could inquire with the Park and Recreation Department if their tree(s) were listed for trimming. If residents were intending to do the trimming themselves or if it had already been done, the Park Department should be given that information and no assessment would be done. Ruth Plotnicky, 5525 Kellogg Avenue, objected to the assessment cost and stated she felt this cost should be paid for by general taxation because everyone in the area benefits. Mayor Richards commented that the City's tree trimming program has been in existence since 1983, based upon this format. Councils in the past have believed this to be an honest way of handling the costs, i.e. assessing those who have boulevard trees on their property rather than funding this through the City's General Fund. No further comment or objection was heard. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING TREE TR EaNG.PROJECT TT -95 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed project: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -95 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with said project including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for the project; that said, project is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -95, and the area to be specifically assessed therefore shall include an area bounded by Highway 100 on the west, Golf Terrace and 54th Street on the north, eastern City boundary line on the east, and the southern City boundary line on the south. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -9 - AMENDING SECTION 605 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE UPDATES TO VARIOUS FIRE CODES. - ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Fire Chief Paulfranz reminded Council that at its meeting of November 7, 1994, the Council gave First Reading to Ordinance No. 1994 -9 - an Ordinance Amending Section 605 of the City Code to Provide Updates to Various Fire Codes. Staff would recommend adoption of the ordinance. No public comment or objections were heard. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 605 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE UPDATES TO VARIOUS FIRE CODES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subdivision 1 of Subsection 605.01 of Section 605 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1 Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code promulgated by the State Department of Public Safety as published in Minnesota Rules, Minnesota Statutes 1993 (299F.011) Parts 7510.3290 through 7510.3480 with the changes and omissions as set forth in this Section." Section 2. Subd. 2 of Subsection 605.01 of Section 605 of the-City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 2 Uniform Fire Code. The 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code promulgated by the International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire Chiefs Association (the "UFC "), with the changes and omissions as set forth in this Section and in the,MUFC." Section 3. Subd. 605.01 of Section 605 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 3 as follows: "Subd. 3 Appendices. The following appendices of the UFC are adopted as part of this Code: II -D, II -E, II -G, IV -B and VI -A." Section 4. Subd. 1 of Subsection 605.02 of Section 605 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1 Article 4. Article 4 "Permits" of UFC is included in its entirety with the following change: Section 4.108, 1.1 is amended by changing the last sentence to read as follows: Where a single container or the aggregate of interconnected containers is 500 or more gallons water capacity, the installer shall obtain a permit and plan approval from the Fire Chief . 11 - Section 5. Subd. 2 of Subsection 605.02 of Section 605 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 2 Article 10. Article 10 "Fire Protection of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended as follows: Section 10.501 is amended by adding to it a new subsection reading as follows: (d) Permits. Permits for installation of fire protection systems shall be obtained as provided for in Section 625 of this Code." Section 6. Subd. 3 of Subsection 605.02 of Section 605 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Subd..3 Article 11. Article 11 "General Precautions 'Against Fire" of the UFC as adopted by the MUFC is amended as follows: A. Section 11.203 is amended by adding to it new subsections (b) and (c) as follows: Section 11.203(b) Open Fires Prohibited. No person shall ignite, cause to be ignited, or maintain an open fire except as permitted in Section 11.203. Section 11.203(c) Certain Open Fires Permitted. An open burning permit in accordance with Section 11.103 may be issued for the following purposes: 1. Instruction and training of firefighting personnel. 2. Abatement of hazards, that, in the opinion of the fire chief, cannot be abated by another reasonable means. 3. Management of vegetation by the jurisdiction, other governmental agencies, or other individual that, in the opinion of the Fire Chief, show a valid need, and under direction of the Fire Department. 4. Special events or ceremonies by recognized organizations, not conforming to Section 11.204 of Appendix II -G, and under the direction of the Fire Department. B. Subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of Section 11.203 are re- lettered (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j) respectively." i Section 7. Subd. 3 of Subsection 605.08 of Section 605 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 3 Sign Specifications. Fire lanes established after the effective date of this Code, or existing fire lanes changed after the effective date of this Code, shall be marked by signs, not more than 100 feet apart, bearing the words, "NO PARKING, FIRE LANE, BY ORDER OF THE FIRE CHIEF ", with the first and last sign marking the limits of the fire lane. The signs shall have red letters and a red border on a white background, shall be 12 inches by 18 inches in size, and shall otherwise comply with the standards from time to time established by the Fire Chief for such signs." Section 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. BID AWARDED FOR TR33EMG OF BOULEVARD TREES ( Proiect No. TT -95) IN SOUTHEAST AREA OF CITY Member Rice made a motion for award of bid for Tree Trimming Project No. TT -95 in the southeast area of the City to recommended low bidder, Precision Tree Company, at $1.11 /dbh per inch for trees 12 inches and under in diameter and $2.42 /dbh per inch for trees over 12 inches in diameter for an approximate total of $30,316.16. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID FOR BITUICENOUS DISTRIBUTOR WITH HYDROSTATIC DRIVE CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 5. 1994 Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to continue the award of bid for a bituminous distributor with hydrostatic drive to the Council Meeting of December 5, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 11 FOOT TRACTOR ROTARY MOVER Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for 11 foot.tractor rotary mower to low bidder, North Star Turf, at $28,411.00 plus sales tax. _Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR RENTAL OF TRACTOR BACKHOE WITH HYDRAULIC HAMMER Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for rental of a tractor backhoe with hydraulic hammer to recommended low bidder, Ziegler, Inc., at $12,660.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ENGINEERING COMPUTER WORKSTATION Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a computer workstation for the Engineering Department to recommended low bidder, Office Products of Minnesota, at $5,816.06, per Logis contract. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR BATTING CAGE AT PAMELA PARR Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a batting cage at Pamela Park to recommended low bidder, Tennis West/Finley Brothers Enterprises, at $6,673.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. ODOR CONTROL PROJECT SCHEDULE PRESENTED BY GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS Michael Bley, President of Golden Valley Microwave Foods, said that following the directive of the Council at its November 7, 1994, meeting they have developed a project schedule for odor control at their facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. He explained the following stages of the schematic for the odor control system developed by Rust Environment & Infrastructure: 1) manufacturing process 2) dry collector (primary function function - odor control) 3) wet collector (primary function 4) outlet. - particulate removal; secondary odor control) Mr. Bley then presented and explained the components of a project schedule beginning November 21, 1994, (week 1) and extending to March 20, 1995 (week 18) with a March 9, 1995 equipment start -up target. Cost for the odor control project would be approximately $180,000.00. Installation cannot be accomplished sooner because the equipment must be custom made. Mr. Bley said that the last thing he intended was to make promises that cannot be fulfilled. Mayor Richards commented that he believed the residents east and west of Highway 100 have been extremely patient with Golden Valley Microwave Foods. The intrusion upon the peace and tranquility of these long established neighborhoods needs to be resolved and it is time for action, not words. Mr. Bley said he is part of a new management team who are trying to resolve this issue. Member Smith asked why Golden Valley Microwave Foods could not cease operations on this new process until the equipment was installed. Mr. Bley responded that this process represents a new product which has taken a portion of the company's product line and the process cannot be stopped as the company's livelihood must be protected. Member Paulus said she had a concern that an objectionable odor like this would be a real financial hardship on homeowners who may want to market their houses in that neighborhood during this timeframe. Also, spring will soon be here when everyone wants to enjoy the outdoors. In addition, Member Paulus mentioned the City's investment in the golf course which could be affected. Mayor Richards asked what recourse the City might have if the proposed equipment did not solve the odor problem and suggested that Golden Valley Microwave Foods then consider ceasing operation of this process. He asked Golden Valley Microwave Foods to come back at the December 5, 1994, Council meeting with possible alternatives if the equipment does not adequately control the odor. REPORT PRESENTED ON PROPOSED 4 -WAY STOP - INTERSECTION OF ST. JOHNS AVENUEAMST WOODLAND ROAD Traffic Safety Coordinator Swanson reported that staff and the Council have discussed STOP signs along St. Johns Avenue several times over the past several years. In June and July, 1994, staff recommended against the installation of signage due to lack of warrant and inconsistency with Edina Residential STOP Sign Policy and the Multiway STOP Sign Policy. Facts leading to the recommendation were: 1) St. Johns Avenue is a very low volume residential street (less than 150 vehicles /day). 2) The 85 percentile speed on St. Johns Avenue is between 21 -25 MPH which is lower than the typical residential street. 3) One accident was reported in a three -year search period - June, 1994 at W. Woodland Road. (June, 1994 at W. Woodland Road.) 4) Streets crossing St. Johns Avenue have low volumes (300 -500 vehicles /day) which are well within residential street categories of under 1000 vehicles /day. 5) W. Woodland Road carries up to 550 vehicles daily during school year. During summer months as many as 200 less on a daily basis. 6) The 85 percentile speed on W. Woodland Road is in the lower 30 MPH range which is more typical of a collector than a residential street. In a 48 -hour period, three of 670 vehicles were noted driving over 40 MPH. 7) Due to angular nature of the intersection, sightlines are not normal or conventional. "Clear view" violations do not exist and visibility is present. 8) Stopping St. Johns Avenue at W. Woodland Road would effectively make W. Woodland a through street between Wooddale Avenue and Concord Avenue. 9) School busses from the northeastern portion of Edina traveling to and from Concord /Southview use W. Woodland Road. Recommend removal of busses with the intent they use W. 58th Street (collector street). Given these, facts in light of the Residential and Multiway STOP sign policies, staff would stay with its position of July, 1994 and would not recommend the installation of signs. Public Comment Barb Hodne, 4532 Tower Street, and Lisa Finsness, 4536 Tower Street, asked the Council to vote in favor of the 4 -way STOP at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue/West Woodland Road. Ms. Hodne presented letters from Dr. Susan Davis, Principal at Concord Elementary School, and David W. Peterson, Principal at South View Middle School, in support of the proposed 4 -way STOP. The letters cited speeds of over 30 MPH, poor visibility, curve on St. Johns Avenue, closeness to schools, athletic fields, parks and the Community Center, safety for student pedestrians, and risk of vehicle accidents as reasons for controlling the intersection. Ms. Hodne emphasized that a 4 -way STOP would be the only way to provide safety for both pedestrians and vehicles at the intersection and concluded by thanking the Council for hearing their concerns on this issue again. Ms. Finsness presented a letter from James A. Hamann, Edina Public Schools, which stated that the children in this area do not qualify for school bus transportation. In the morning there is a concentration of school children in grades six through nine walking to South View Middle School at the same time as many residents are driving to work. Also, the absence of sidewalks and the piling of snow in the winter months exacerbates the risk to walkers. Ms. Finsness urged the Council to look at more than statistics and to view this with common sense. George Lee, 5700 Fairfax Avenue, said this intersection is like an accident waiting to happen. He said he has seen vehicles coming from both streets, slamming on brakes and blowing horns because they feel the other is in the wrong. Mary Schuller, 4609 Tower Street, commented that this is a turnover neighborhood with many children. She pointed out that the intersection does not look like a normal intersection because drivers are confused as to who has the right of way. Jim Tucker, 4620 Tower Street, said he concurred with the comments made by the neighbors. He asked the Council to look beyond the statistics and consider the safety of the children in the neighborhood. Member Kelly commented that she had driven the area several times and felt the residents have made a good case for the need for STOP signs at the intersection. She said it is the Council's job to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens. Member Kelly made a motion to hold a public hearing to consider installing a 4 -Way STOP at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and West Woodland Road. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ms. Finsness interjected that this meeting was scheduled as a public hearing on the issue. Member Kelly asked if the neighborhood was notified. Coordinator Swanson answered that residents on West Woodland Road and St. Johns Avenue were notified about this meeting; residents on Tower Street and contributory streets were not notified. Member Kelly responded that a 4 -way STOP would impact a larger area than just neighbors on West Woodland and St. Johns and that Council should not take action until the greater area had been notified. Mayor Richards said he could not support the motion because of common sense, i.e. here we are talking about less than 300 cars per day and adopting policies to provide a semblance of orderly regulation in the City. If this intersection is made a 4 -Way STOP, every intersection in Edina would qualify for a 4 -Way STOP. Mayor Richards then called for vote on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Smith Nays: Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion failed. Member Paulus asked if there is any way the intersection could be changed to make it more like a normal intersection. Engineer Hoffman answered that, because of the layout of the streets, it would be impossible to reorient the intersection to make it into a perfect square or T- intersection. She added that she did not support the motion because from the testimony presented the intersection is confusing to drivers and adding STOP signs would only add to that. Member Rice commented that he did not support the motion because the intersection is almost a disincentive by its design. He said he had spent time in the area and in a thirty minute period around 4:45 P.M. had observed 16 vehicles using the intersection, 11 of which were through vehicles, four went into adjacent driveways and one he sensed to be speeding somewhat. Member Rice said his impression of the intersection was (after repeated interruptions from the audience Member Rice declined further comment). TRAFFIC.SAFETY STAFF REPORT PRESENTED As directed by the Council, Engineer Hoffman presented a report on the history of STOP signs, speed limits and staff's understanding of enforcement. He said the majority of the requests for STOP signs have resulted from the issue of speed. In 1994 to date there have been 29 requests for STOP signs. Staff believes a portion of those requests resulted from the traffic management plan in the Country Club District where the effort was to reduce the total through traffic by increasing the travel time by means of STOP signs, and not for the purpose of reducing speed. Engineer Hoffman explained that the State Statute established maximum speed limits in Minnesota for normal driving conditions and the limits are in effect with or without posted signs. It is important to remember that a speed limit sign is a regulatory traffic control device and it must not be over used or used arbitrarily if its effectiveness is to be maintained. Minnesota law, therefore, provides for speed limits to be based on the results of an engineering and traffic investigation. Specific data is collected and evaluated during such an investigation. One of the most critical data is speed patterns because they are determined by driver reaction to many of the other factors. Contrary to popular belief, speed limits do not generally determine the speed of traffic, but are determined by driver reaction to perceived conditions. Only an extraordinary and continuous enforcement effort can coerce everyone to drive at speeds below what they consider reasonable. Considering the functions of a speed limit, it is apparent that a speed limit is of the most use on a through street where non -local traffic can be expected, traffic volumes are high enough to make smooth traffic flow a consideration, and enforcement activity is likely. Speed limits are of little benefit on strictly local residential streets where virtually all traffic consists of local residents who drive the road daily and are familiar with conditions and where enforcement activity is infrequent at best. Another factor that discourages use of posted speed limits for local residential streets is the cost of signing which can be very high and the benefit low. Thee may be locations within the City should be reviewed for speed limit reduction. The City Council in the past has adopted resolutions to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) requesting speed limit reviews. Normally, a request to lower a limit below 30 MPH will not receive favorable response within a residential street area. A geometric condition in a specific area might warrant a lowez regulatory limit but the normal practice is to install warning advisory speed signs in response to the basic speed law (drive at a speed safe for the conditions). The other approach of late is to change the urban residential speed limit to 25 MPH (not intended for collection or arterial streets which are usually zoned at 30 to 45 MPH). The City Council may wish to discuss supporting this idea because of the general method in which the enforcement must operate. Tolerances are required for equipment errors or misadjustments, general tolerance that most are driving at a safe limit slightly above the posted or urban speed limit. As an example, by posting a legal limit at 25 MPH, one can enforce at a lower MPH than one could at a posted limit of 30 MPH. In speaking to the City Prosecutor about the court considerations related to a change in speed limit in residential areas in Edina, his main concern was how the change would be posted. He feels judges would be very stringent about adequate signing since 25 MPH would be lower than the statewide norm. Defendants' claims of inadequate notice would be taken into account with a greater burden of proof placed on the City since we would be operating outside of u-­'­-.1 speed limits. A second concern is that the citations be written with suffi.:: '''Prance over the posted limit to allow for the variety of challenges the detenu:ints Firing up in court. The tolerance would give the judge a margin for error when justifying guilty verdicts. Regarding enforcement, Engineer Hoffman pointed out that the City of Edina writes as many tags for speeding as other suburbs in the metropolitan area. Member Smith commented that there are areas in the City where there are special circumstances or geography that do not fit into the 30 MPH category. He suggested that staff look at those intersections for consideration as to lowering the speed limits in those areas. Member Rice said he felt cities should be able to designate certain areas for lower speed limits. Engineer Hoffman observed that the issue may be whether the Statc nt Minnesota should lower its speed limit from the existing 30 MPH. He noted t:,..` other adjacent states are at 25 MPH. Mayor Richards suggested that the Council may want to reflect on the report and formulate some judgement at a subsequent meeting as to whether or not this issue of a lower statewide speed limit should be communicated to Edina's legislators. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: DOG DECLARED POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS (5239 WEST HIGHWOOD DRIVE ) Chief Bernhjelm advised Council that the Animal Control Officer has received reports of three bites on other dogs by the back lab owned by Dr. James Zavoral, 5239 West Highwood Drive. He noted that the dog's owner has taken some preventative steps and has been cooperative in attempting to resolve this situation. However, the owners of one of the other dogs has requested the declaration of Potentially Dangerous Dog. The dog meets the definition of Potentially Dangerous Dog and this declaration would put the owner on notice that further attacks would result in a dangerous dog hearing which could result in strict penalties. The Potentially Dangerous Dog designation would carry no immediate penalties. Public Comment Dr. James Zavoral, 5239 West Highwood Drive, said his dog has never attacked another person. He said they have installed an invisible fence which has been in place for six weeks and the dog can get out no door without meeting this fence. So far the dog has not left the yard. The dog had been chained before when left out and the dog got away one time when he was out of town. He said he knew the owners of the dog that was bitten and felt sorry that it had happened. He asked what his right$ were regarding a declaration of Potentially Dangerous Dog. Dr. Tim Diegel, 6224 Pine Grove Road, said he would support having the black lab declared a Potentially Dangerous Dog. He referred to the documentation of the Animal Control Officer which described the three separate occasions when the black lab (Maggie) attacked two different dogs. He presented a statement describing the severity of the first attack on the Diegel's Westie. The report of the veterinarian stated that over 50 stitches were required to close the wound. He said the attacks have affected their daughters who have had dreams about a black dog. Dr. Diegel said that according to state law these attacks meet the requirements for declaring the black lab a Potentially Dangerous Dog. Council Comment /Action Mayor Richards advised Dr. Zavoral that a finding by the Council that the dog is a potentially dangerous dog does not impose any additional restrictions on the dog or its owner. However, if a dog which has been found to be potentially dangerous thereafter bites or attacks a persons or domestic animal, the Council could then declare the dog to be a "dangerous dog" as defined in M.S. 347.50, Subd. 2. A new hearing by the Council would be required to declare a potentially dangerous dog a dangerous dog and such declaration would result in strict penalties. Dr. Zavoral said he understood some of the ramifications if his dog were declared a Potentially Dangerous Dog or a Dangerous Dog. He observed that there are other back labs in the neighborhood and there is a remote question of doubt that his dog was involved. Member Rice commended the neighbors for talking with each other on this matter. He stated that he felt the black lab owned by Dr. Zavoral meets the criteria (3) been found to be potentially dangerous and, after the owner has received notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: DECLARATION OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore caused notice of hearing to be mailed pursuant to Edina City Code 300.17, Subd. 5.B and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice has considered the views of all persons interested and has been fully advised of the pertinent facts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Council does hereby declare the black lab named Maggie at 5239 West Highwood Drive to be a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 347. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *YEAR END COUNCIL MEETING DATE SET FOR DECEMBER 29, 1994 Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith setting December 29, 1994, at 5:00 P.M. as the Year End Council Meeting date. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER REQUEST (BETUEEN 4608 AND 4500 LAREVIEQ DRIVE) REFERRED TO ENGINEERING FOR PROCESSING Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition for permanent street surfacing with curb and gutter between 4608 and 4500 Lakeview Drive to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 4. MARS DALQUIST ADDITION Mayor Richards stated that the request to reconsider the partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Mark Dalquist Addition is before the Council because of information since the last meeting. Attorney Gilligan has advised that prior Council practice has been to not reconsider a decision unless a Council Member who voted with the prevailing side moves for the reconsideration and this motion is approved by the Council. Member Smith made a motion to reconsider the request for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Mark Dalquist Addition, and that the matter be placed on the December 4, 1994, Council Agenda to set a hearing date. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Smith stated that at the meeting of November 7, 1994, just prior to the vote on this request, it was indicated that the percentage of the proposed protrusion into the conservation restriction was approximately three percent. Not having thought that through, and on further investigation by asking Mr. Clark directly, Member Smith said he learned that the hard wall release Mr. Clark was looking for was .89 percent of the entire 21,500 square feet of the conservation easement. Member Smith explained that he thought he was dealing with three percent of a building and on that basis he suggested that the Council review this in light of the other three undeveloped lots in the subdivision. Mayor Richards then called for vote on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Richards CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Mayor Richards noted that Howard Thompson had requested to be on the Council Agenda to voice a concern. Because Mr. Thompson was not present no concern was heard. Rudy Christianson, 7500 York Avenue South, asked if consideration has been given to resurfacing Xerxes Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street on the east side of Southdale. VACANCIES NOTED ON VARIOUS AMH BOARDS AND COMMITTEES Assistant Manager Hughes advised the Council that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) has announced vacancies on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Board of Directors and that any Council Members interested in serving should let him know. CLAIMS PAID Member Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 17, 1994, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $280,088.99; Commnmication'$1,518.65; Working Capital $5,610.05; Art Center $4,683.95; Swimming Pool $863.27; Golf Course $27,429.39; Ice Arena $4,579.18; Gum Range $102.77; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $16,063.58; Utility Fund $18,899.13; Storm Sewer $1,912.18; Liquor Fund $66,166.20; Construction Fund $370,977.41; TOTAL $798,894.75; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown on detail on the Check Register dated November 11, 1994, and consisting of 7 pages: General Fund $101,618.60; and Liquor Fund $229,993.43; TOTAL $331,612.03. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 8:40 P.M. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CLOSED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 21, 1994 AT 2:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Smith. Mayor Richards entered the meeting at 3:15 P.M. Staff present were Assistant Manager Hughes, Assistant to Manager Smith, and Clerk Daehn. Attorney Tom Harder, retained by the City's insurance company in the matter of Music Cafes v. City of Edina, was also present. The Council was advised that the purpose of this special closed meeting was to prepare the Council Members for their depositions scheduled on November 22, 1994 concerning the Music Cafes litigation. Attorney Harder informed the Council Members of the basics of the deposition process, the purpose of the depositions and the general principles that would apply and then responded to questions of individual Members. No formal action was taken by the Council and no other business was discussed. Mayor Richards declared the closed meeting adjourned at 3:47 P.M. City Clerk A o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # ll. FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent City Planner Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: December 5, 1994 ® To Council SUBJECT: S -94 -1, Final Plat Approval - Action ❑ Motion Parkwood Knolls 24th Addn. Parkwood Knolls Constr. Co. 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Final plat approval subject to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District grading permit. Info /Background: The Council granted preliminary plat approval for this 91 lot development on July 18, 1994. The entire property will be developed incrementally. Phase I is a 33 lot plat which includes the completion of Interlachen Boulevard to connect with Malibu Drive. Phase I includes both Phases I and II illustrated on the attached overall development plan. The Developers Agreement for Phase I, public improvements, has been executed.. No wetlands alteration permit is required for Phase I development. The subject development has not yet received a grading permit from the Watershed District. The permit hearing is scheduled for December 21, 1994. The permit was a condition of preliminary plat approval. However, the Council is allowed by Ordinance to grant final approval conditioned on receipt of the permit by the Watershed District. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PIAT FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION ", platted by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 5, 1994, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 1994. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 5, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of December, 1994. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk PARKWOOD-- KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION N GRAPHIC SCALE ( Eff 7nT t !mh - 100 tL FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT A. PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF NORTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST. -DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED LICENSE NO. 20281. p = 21 °49'17" R = 385.02 L = 146.64 N 78°29'14" E ; - 64.35 - - � 2 rr• s, L = 18°15'33" gN NPR ado R = 850.85 L = 271.15 oo `�36 G�04'02'30• R� \• 46 L -60.02 im G�3 48)6661 o P-330.00- ,l 1 i.f,.63 8 0 � ` 2�23633 f to w N 04 °43'33" E �J�'�� 6 78.00 93 N 69'28'33' E� 0 1ITOC p = 04°54'52 " 19.8 _ _ - � a,, R = 1135.00 4 l `a'.7e• a L = 97.35 &- 76-39'27'�s J?•� ,e.L 20.07 e DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 1 N68R8'33'E 134.26 �� 1 Z 150.01 COYJIW CT. N O / - N88'28'33'E 198.67 - 159.23 5.00 -S 1 �'I 139.. oI 5.00 V p n o g n 10.00 10.00 � L , L 156.70 -- S F BEING 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. p = 43 °30'28" lt.al S 230.52 6 E Q R = 144.56 3.2 .05'E -'1 91 28' 6653 St S26'OOS'E� -1 6005 '1 C = 107.15 _ , N13'26'05•W . 35.03 L = 109.77 - -' ` S13128'05'E</ Cb = N28 °31'03 "E D3'W 92.07 1 • 1+ N 06 °45'49" �1 ST `OMaS /° , 48.27 - - -- 1tl J 1�- 8 1 \9 \6 S t3R8.05' E 66.41 _�� N7671'55'E 55.00 6o p = 49 °54'08" Z R = 292.39 8 g L.= 254.66 Z. dJ Lu x / • 4 {Wy 9� v 0 •� O '1� / 'IN33' 10 9 ? ?O• _ - ! N5679'57E 10 6�� (\ y� 94.74 s o �gS Ao� S yva - N 56'39'57' E /\ 60.02 N 87 °51'16" E 448.37 �y43•�p• F r lt.al S 230.52 6 E Q a10'16't3�' 21 3.2 .05'E -'1 91 28' 6653 St S26'OOS'E� -1 6005 '1 -4i1 38 - ,52 ' la , N13'26'05•W . 35.03 N715.01�•E S13128'05'E</ L V� D3'W 92.07 1 • 1+ �z ° ) n N 1 �1 ST `OMaS /° LIR' F fJ�t EN �O Yq� 1tl J 1�- 8 1 \9 \6 S t3R8.05' E 66.41 _�� N7671'55'E 55.00 R. T. DOC. NO. EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC. SURVEYORS PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION R. T. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation, owner of the following described property situate in the County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, to wit: Outlet A, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat on file or record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. N 8731'16' E 448.37 Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to *�J' •� A ° 43.30'28' ` the public for public use forever the Boulevard, Terrace, and the Court and the easements as shown on the plat for drainage and R 144.56 utility purposes. C 107.15 L 109.77 m �.�,-• - Cb N2871'03'E g In witness whereof said Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its vJ , AN 08.45'49' E �� proper partner this day of 1993. �- A ° 49.54'08',' 48.27 J•`J R ° 29239"' 8 _ - V L 254.66, - m Parkwood Knolls Construction Company - - - .�J S 29'14'56' E BY F 128.94 Harvey C. Hanson. President C. }4235 �^.}_1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN A ° 21.49'17' V The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 199_ , by Harvey C. Hansen, ) R °783.02 ,� _ I I President of Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation. on behalf of the corporation. Cj L° 146.64 D P M178h9'14'E ,S9g C . 64.35 A 1815'33', S ` ,c.J g19' &8 R ° 850.85 ' , � 7 0 L ° 271.15 �X( a T cc C3 li - - S 331750' - " I - Notary Public, County, Minnesota \� I "�� - - - , 162.60 E m I N I My Commission Expires: r:.� 074;43W3* E I I I I l7 L� I hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and lotted the property p 04'54'52' � I Cj Y Y Yw D pro erl described on thin lot as PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION: that R ° 1135.00 N , J I to this plot is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shorn in feet antl hundredths of o foot; that L 97.75 APPLE :.A;:: 3 all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local govemmental unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated as shown on the plat; and that there are no wet lands as defined L r+ a k "') in MS505.02 Subdivision 1 to be dedicated. L i •S 0472 21' W C i , 2;6.08 I . 588'28'33'W 502.78 i _ ' \ C3 Jack 8dke. Land Surveyor A ° 09.2724" �3 \ Minnesota License No. 20281 'C _R 272.25 - I L °44.93 k L °04.703' L - R ° 637.38 �� .�S 89.46'00' W STATE OF MINNESOTA L 104.70 ♦ 150.00 '�`� ,rn COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ' J bS 207'11' E The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 199_ , by 01r, Jack Bolke, Minnesota License No. 20281. z + 107.56 6 ` -V - Notary Public, County, Minnesota O♦,• ro0 L )- EDINA, MINNESOTA My Commission Expires: 1 7� �• �� This plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Edina. Minnesota, at a J ut O regular meeting thereof held this of 199_ . If applicable, the written comments 55.45'09' W •: �) and recommendations of the Commissioner of Trop l ' , 5 }_7} O Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by lC �4 7 the City or the prescribed' 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as 1 u,N provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. '^ CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Z rL1 • �L7 J �`•�� N by ,Mayor by. Manager I TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION ,x'a Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify Na ears ave been t taxes payable in and rior h { this da of 199 p Y paid for land described on this plat. Dated S 8918'00' W - 1 ia`'P. C) y 760.00 , ♦ .0. W 5 8S'S1- �.- I S787236'E �' h 6* 178;40 S 0710's7' E Patrick H. O'Connor, Hennepin County Auditor by Deputy ' 167.86 3p� I'p0. - r 54.08 SURVEY SECTION " N52'252 oWc - Hennepin County. Minnesota ^�+a",/�� �. 6`i ♦ 1 �VV' Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 3838, 565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of - 199_ GRAPHIC SCALE ��a�{ ft am coos Awe / P 7°0 4 re0 am 'm m CP4 • Gary F. Caswell, Hennepin County Surveyor by :. 10 IN FM REGISTRAR OF TITLES 1 heoh ° 208 R Hennepin County, Minnesota DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I hereby certify that the within plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION was filed in this office this day of FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE EAST LINE _ OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6 IS 199_ at _ o'clock _ . M. ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 - R. Dan Carlson, Registrar of Titles by Deputy DEGREES 24 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST. BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES *DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. SET AND MARKED LICENSE NO. 20281. . EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC. SURVEYORS SCALE+ I'-FCC' UJI ZN CC CC W < I .. . m I 103 / k --777 — I I I IF \ - _ , �. % .icei L Ito W z X GREEN N lilt n cc LU T 103 216 Ce .012v 0 IL 21 El E, 4 K-E UG 3- 10 0 1c, 0 1� U 16 20 34 0 0 37 .7 k t 3 '� �� w / 40. -. ? _._ : i - �� �� _ I ( DEVELOPMENT DATA: 91 LOTS 53.1 ACRES !�A 25,417 SF'/ LOT 4 C. Cd A/ < 19 I I i uj -j LL) 0 DRIVE _sac' .�. /, � f� .�\ •T b '_ _ �" �_ ,C > j I Lim rj. Fivu pi A r 3 j.-T r FAZ Roger A. Anderson & Associates PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION Civil Engineering Land Development EDINA, MINNESOTA ,12, 7-* 15 1.*-'a,za:a6,--L;'-?.1-.! BY: PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONST. CO. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASING PLAN Co.. SS,04 N- 9110 12/02/1994 16:15 6129336558 STEVE DONDLINGER PAGE 02 November 30, 1994 Mayor Fred Richards 7225 Fleetwood Dr Edina MN 55431) Dear Mayor Richards AGENDA ITEM II.B. Because of late hours at work and heavy growing family commitments it has been impossible for us to make it to planning commission meetings and/or city council meetings. With regard to the Interlachen Road issue, we feel that the desire to change from the original plan of the area is voiced primarily by those in the very near vicinity. We only ask that you make your dec:c;on laud on how it affects the whole Parkwood Knolls arra as a fair distribution of traits Please do not bend to the oressttres of a minority wanting special treatment, thus :au si ng the rest of the area to be exposed to more of their share of the traffic. Please call i f you have any questions for us. A. o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 0 ja a TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent City Planner Only ❑ Information Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: December 5, 1994 D To Council SUBJECT: Review of comprehensive Action F-xl Motion Plan - Northwest Edina ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the Comprehensive Plan not be amended. Info /Background: Refer to attached minutes and materials: (1) Synopsis of Planning Commission meeting of November 30, 1994. (2) Hoisington Koegler Group Land Use Study. (3) Strgar Roscoe Fausch Traffic Study. (4) Past Council minutes including July 18, when Preliminary Plat approval for Parkwood Road 24th Addition was granted. (5) Correspondence received since Land Use Study was commissioned by Council. Synopsis of Planning Commission Action November 30,1994 Rewiew of Comprehensive Plan Northwest Edina Mr. Fred Hoisington of Hoisington Koegler Group presented the study to the Commmission with the recommendation that the Comprehensive Plan not be amended, and that Interlachen Boulevard should connect to Malibu Drive. The following list of residents addressed the Commission: Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road; Tish Reynolds, 6224 Parkwood Road; Alan Hirsch 6420 Willow Wood Road; Bob Hasleow, 6408 Interlachen Boulevard; Kevin Grahm, 6512 Parkwood Road; and Dawn Kerrison, 6517 Willow Wood Road. Commissioner Hale moved that the Comprehensive Plan not be amended. Commissioner McCelland seconded the motion. Ayes Hale, Faust, L. Johnson, McCelland, Workinger, Swenson, Bergman, G. Johnson. Byron absained. Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend the Council consider the issues in connection with the development: 1. Critically look at site distance problems along existing Interlachen Boulevard. 2. Consider placing median in Interlachen near future tot lot park for safer pedestrian access to the park. 3. Consider renaming new section of Interlachen Boulevard. Commissioner Workinger Seconded the motion. All voted Aye. Commissioner McCelland moved to recommend consideration of an all way stop at the Intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen. Hale Seconded motion. Ayes Hale, McCelland, Workinger, Bergman, G. Johnson. Nayes Faust, L.Johnson, Byron, Swenson. Motion acrried 5 to 4. . PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24th ADDITION LAND USE STUDY DY November 23, 1994 Prepared For: City of Edina Prepared By: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. H K �, 1 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. H It MEMORANDUM To: Craig Larsen, Planning Director City of Edina From: Fred Hoisington, Planning Consultant Subject: Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Land Use Study Date: 11 -23 -94 Per your request, we transmit the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Land Use Study for distribution to the City Council and Planning Commission. INTRODUCTION The Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKG) /Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch Inc. (SRF) Team was commissioned by the City of Edina to do a land use study to determine whether or not Interlachen Road should be extended to Malibu Drive in accordance with the City's 1978 Comprehensive Plan. The catalyst for the study was an application by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company for final plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. The plat calls for the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive per the Comprehensive Plan. The extension has been an element of the Comprehensive Plan since 1978. Residents in the vicinity of Interlachen Road expressed concerns about the Interlachen Road extension feeling that it would inordinately and perhaps unfairly burden the street and neighborhood with . traffic. The study was authorized by the City Council to provide an objective evaluation upon which to base the approval or denial of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Land Use /Environmental ■ Planning/Design 7300 Metro Boulevard /Suite 525 a Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ■ (612) 835 -9960 ■ Fax: (612) 835 -3160 SCOPE OF STUDY The study area is generally bounded by Blake Road, Highway 169, the Nine Mile Creek and Waterman Avenue. Within this study area, a smaller area was defined for the purpose of traffic analysis which has 483 existing residential units and the potential for 60 infill units (see Figure 1). This area was able to be cordoned off and studied in detail to determine the number of internal trips generated by the study area and external trips passing through it. The traffic study focused on the impact of the proposed 91 lot Parkwood Knolls subdivision and the extent to which additional through trips might be attracted attributable to the connection of Interlachen Road with Malibu Drive. A copy of the SRF traffic study memo is included with this report. In addition to , traffic, the study included the evaluation of land use, including an assessment of the future use of the Hennepin County garage site which is located just west of Highway 169 in Hopkins. The study did not address the issue of lot size other than as it relates to the original preliminary plat which was approved in 1978. The proposed average lot size (considering all 91 lots) is slightly larger than was proposed in 1978 in large part attributable to the 1990 Wetlands Conservation Act which requires the preservation and /or mitigation of the loss of wetlands. STUDY PROCESS The process included an evaluation of existing conditions, site and area analysis, three meetings with representatives of the neighborhood, traffic forecasting/ assignment, report preparation and presentation to the City Planning Commission and City Council. Minutes of the neighborhood meetings plus attendance lists are attached. PARKWOOD KNOLLS PROPOSAL Parkwood Knolls Construction Company is requesting final plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition consisting of 33 lots and one large outlot which will be subdivided at a future date into 58 additional lots. Phase 1 includes the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive in accordance with City plans. The preliminary plat was approved by the City in July 1994. Denial of the final plat will require a companion amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 2 _ — I I " i T • • • .m • • • • • • i • PARKWOOD KNOLLS m� /�,,�. v • � • Imp • \ • �S • 5 v = �o W e U \ s i a i •���� • • • • • 9�• •'�. Use I• • : �• • • • • • • • • a0-v: I % � r8 • �•1, . , - • • • m • • _ • • m® • • •� • • m �I Z %1,• �•fi Figure 1 LEGEND Q 1 PARKWOOD KNOLLS LAND USE STUDY Hoiaington Koegler Group Inc. EDINA MINNESOTA ©m Study Area ®® City of Edina Lad use / gar8em•antal • Planning / Design 7900 Metre Boulevard, Salta 686 Ylaneapolt■, 111anMots. 65459 619/856 -996o • Total Existing: 483 units ® Total Infill: ,• ` 60 units • .� The Lincoln: 210 units Interlachen Hills: 67 units Q 1 PARKWOOD KNOLLS LAND USE STUDY Hoiaington Koegler Group Inc. EDINA MINNESOTA ©m Study Area ®® City of Edina Lad use / gar8em•antal • Planning / Design 7900 Metre Boulevard, Salta 686 Ylaneapolt■, 111anMots. 65459 619/856 -996o FACTORS CONSIDERED Based on comments received from and concerns expressed by neighborhood residents, City Staff and the developer of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition, the following criteria were established as the measures for evaluating alternatives. • Traffic Distribution - preference is for the equitable distribution of trafic to /from neighborhood. 1) • Accessibility - preference is for acceptable/ organized access "for neighborhood residents" based on the natural directional distribution of traffic. Also, to provide access to the park. • Traffic Volume Impact - preference is for acceptable marginal increases in traffic over acceptable base levels. 2) • Pedestrian Safety - preference is for maximum child/ pedestrian safety. • Emergency Access - preference is for acceptable emergency vehicle accessibility to all areas within neighborhood without employing artificial barriers. • Traffic Safety - preference is to put traffic where it can be accommodated safely with the minimum potential for conflict (considering driveways, streets, sight lines, etc.). • Congestion - preference is to correct, if possible, existing traffic congestion affecting the neighborhood. • Cost - preference is to accommodate neighborhood traffic with minimal public improvement cost. • Consensus - preference is for all parties to agree to a solution. • Property Values - preference is for a solution which has the least adverse effect on property values. 1 For the purpose of this study, neighborhood is defined as the area generally bordered by Blake Road on the east, the Nine Mile Creek on the south, Highway 169 on the west, and Waterman Avenue on the north. 2) Base levels are volumes that will likely exist under any rational option based on the location of the street in the system. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Two basic alternatives were evaluated by the Consultant Team (Figures 2 and 3). A third option (not illustrated) was applied to the two original alternatives in an effort to "tune" the neighborhood's traffic flow. Option 1 extends Interlachen Road only to Kelsey Terrace. It includes no direct connection to Malibu Drive except for circuitous routing to the south and west. Option 2 connects Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive in accordance with the current Comprehensive Plan. Option 3 creates a less direct connection of Malibu Drive to Highway 169 and employs stop signs as means to further discourage through traffic. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 5 PARKWOOD KNOLLS LAND USE STUDY Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. EDINA MINNESOTA City of Edina mm ®® land Use / Em bummental • Planning / Design 7900 Metre Boulevard, Suite 626 Mtnaup011 Mlnneeeta 66498 612/696 -g660 PARKWOOD KNOLLS LAND USE STUDY EDINA MINNESOTA City of Edina Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ®m ®® land Use / gnv6wmantal • Planning / Dedga 7900 Metre Boulevard. Sate 686 lllnaaapolla/ 960 66489 Gig EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES * CRITERIA OPTIONS COMMENTS 1 2 3 Traffic Distribution - + - Option 1 distributes traffic everywhere but to Interlachen. Option 3 puts more traffic on interior neighborhood streets. Accessibility - + + Option 1 circuitous routing of traffic creates continuation of disorganized pattern for neighborhood residents. Traffic Volume Impact - + - Option 1 gives strong preference to Interlachen. Option 3 gives no relief to residential streets south of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. Pedestrian Safety + - + Options 1 and 3 put less traffic at park site than Option 2. Emergency Access - + + Option 1 slows emergency vehicle reaction time to Malibu Drive. Traffic Safety - + + Horizontal alignment is better than interior streets. There are less driveway and street accesses along Interlachen to interfere with traffic. Congestion (existing) + - - Could be corrected with traffic control at Blake and Interlachen. Cost + + - Option 2 may require limited im- provements to Interlachen. Option 3 requires more significant costs. Property Values - + + Option 1 externalizes value impacts of traffic to the remaining neighborhood. Consensus ? ? ? * See Appendix A for rationale Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 8 RECOMMENDATION - DON'T AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Based on our evaluation, Option 2 provides a more equitable distribution of traffic to, from, and within the neighborhood. It organizes traffic patterns for neighborhood residents and better balances the impact of new traffic on the primary access streets within the neighborhood. While Option 1, (the only option requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment) has a lesser impact on the Interlachen Road access, it pushes virtually all new traffic to the opposite corners of the neighborhood. If we assume there will be value impacts attributable to increased traffic, Option 1 pushes all of the impact elsewhere. Assuming the expected traffic pattern with heaviest volumes at the entrances to the neighborhood and lowest volumes at the center, Interlachen must be expected to carry a volume similar to Schaefer Road and Parkwood Lane. It will carry much less than its fair share of traffic if the extension to Malibu Drive is not developed. While the volume of traffic on Interlachen Road will remain relatively low as contrasted with other similarly positioned streets in the neighborhood, it will still be desirable to minimize the number of through trips. It is recommended that limited use of stop signs and, perhaps, a change in the name of the street between Kelsey Terrace and Malibu Drive be considered. Option 3 tends to over - correct, putting excessive traffic on Parkwood Lane and other interior residential streets south of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. RATIONALE There are several streets in the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood that are already carrying 1,500 ADT (average daily trips) or more. They include the following: Schaefer Road - 1,450 to 1,600, Interlachen Road east of Schaefer Road - 2,030, Dovre Drive 2,070, Telemark Trail 1,660. These higher volumes correlate with the entrances to the neighborhood. Several internal .streets carry in excess of 1,000 ADT. The following streets fall in that category: Parkwood Road 1,170 to 1,550, Stauder Circle 1,240, Parkwood Lane 1,460. These streets tend to serve as collector streets because of the lack of collector alternatives. These internal neighborhood streets carry more traffic than their alignment and intended function would suggest is appropriate. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 9 While Malibu Drive is approaching 1,000 ADT, it is the least developed access to the neighborhood. Because of the direct proximity of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition, the volume of traffic on Malibu Drive north of Telemark Trail can be expected to grow rapidly. Post development, it will surpass the volume of the other neighborhood entrance streets. Option 1 accommodates almost no traffic increase on Interlachen Road though the natural traffic directional flow is to the north /northeast (see Figure 4). Options 2 and 3 provide for volume increases of 18 and 31% (over existing volumes) which is slightly higher than Schaefer Road and Dovre Drive but is consistent with the natural direction of traffic flow to /from the neighborhood. Not only does Option 1 not provide an organized traffic or street system to accommodate neighborhood residents, it pushes traffic to several other streets that already exceed acceptable residential street traffic standards. Traffic Volume Impact Streets that are generally at the corners of and provide access to the neighborhood should anticipate carrying the most traffic in the neighborhood, averaging over 2,000 ADT. Streets that are at the perimeter of the neighborhood - Schaefer Road, Malibu Drive, Parkwood Lane and Interlachen Road should be expected to carry approximately equal volumes of traffic since these lead directly to the corner accesses where volumes are highest. The average existing volume on Schaefer Road and Parkwood Lane is 1,530 ADT. This, therefore, is the volume that is considered acceptable for Interlachen Road and Malibu Drive as base traffic levels. Interior streets should generally carry less than 1;000 ADT. Even with Options 2 and 3, Interlachen Road will continue to be the least traveled of the four primary entrances to the neighborhood (see Figure 5). Option 2 benefits internal neighborhood streets which should be expected to carry less traffic. Pedestrian Safety_ Pedestrian safety is a significant concern throughout the neighborhood. The reasons for scoring Option 1 slightly higher than Option 2 is because there may be a concentration of children near the Park site. Option 3 virtually brings Interlachen Road to a local street volume. Emergency Access Option 1 provides for only limited accessibility to Malibu Drive from within the City. Alternative accesses include those at the two Highway 169 interchanges. The connection of Interlachen Road provides yet another emergency access route and provides more certain access without slowing emergency vehicle reaction time. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 10 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Option 1 - No Connection Option 2 - Connection Option 3 - "Tuned" Connection +1170 (126 %) f 6 +1940 (209 %) +1580 (170 %) +810(129%) +680(108%) +370(18%) +60(3%) I �61 601 A. Parkwood Road 630 (1440) [1310] 310 1 �cL�ryh01 +180 (9 %) try�i✓ +400 (19 %) +630 (310/6) +370 (18%) +190(12%) +190 12% +190 (1296) 0, J xxxx Existing Volume (ADT) (xxxx) Option 1 [xxxx] Option 2 xxxx Option 3 Figure 4 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. CONNECTING STREETS TRAFFIC VOLUME IMPACT Option 1 - No Connection Option 2 - Connection Option 3 - "Tuned" Connection 8> v �P xy�2o 9 o O O\O \ �1 2 \` 6 2 "� 0 °1 X x),O x J jo�r°rj,95�0 ° �� fJ xxxx Acceptable Base Level Traffic (xxxx) Option 1 [xxxx] Option 2 xxxx Option 3 * % Traffic Over Acceptable Base Level Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Figure 5 ft Traffic Safety The horizontal alignment of Interlachen Road is more conducive to carrying traffic than are the neighborhood's interior residential streets which. are curvilinear in nature. While sightlines may be of some concern, warranting future improvements, there are generally less driveway and street accesses along existing Interlachen to interfere with projected traffic volumes. Accidents on neighborhood streets do not suggest that a problem exists. Since 1989, Interlachen Road has experienced two property damage accidents while Parkwood Lane has had one property damage and one personal injury accident. During the same timeframe, Parkwood Road experienced two accidents as did Malibu Drive. The primary point of congestion within the neighborhood is the intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard. Options 2 and 3 will put more traffic at that intersection, however, even with the extension of Interlachen Road and the increase in traffic, the intersection will continue to function at Level of Service D which is considered to be an acceptable level of service. Interlachen Road will operate at a Level of Service B or better with Options 2 and 3. Option 2 may require improvements to correct sightlines along Interlachen Road especially those in close proximity to Schaefer Road. Sight lines are of primary concern though traffic control and the enforcement of clear zones at intersection_ s could be employed to minimize potential conflicts. Proper Values If one assumes that home values will be negatively impacted by traffic volume increases (though debatable given the magnitude of volume increases in this case), one must also assume that no matter where those volumes occur there will be an impact. If one street must carry the entire increase in traffic, the impact will be concentrated. If volumes can be distributed to other streets, the same value impact will be spread over a larger number of homes, resulting in minimal impacts. With Option 1, Interlachen Road operates at considerably below its acceptable base level of traffic considering its location within the neighborhood. With Option 2, its volume only slightly exceeds the acceptable base level. It remains, however, the lowest volume of the four entrances to the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. Options 2 and 3 best distribute whatever property value impact may be attributable to traffic increases. Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition /Land Use Study Page 13 SRFSTRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCI-I, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS' TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL s STRUCTURAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ PARKING SRF No. 0942142 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. FROM_ : Dennis R. Eyler, P.E., Principal Jeff Bednar, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist DATE: - November 23, 1994 SUBJECT: PARKWOOD KNOLLS /INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD TRAFFIC STUDY As you requested, we have completed a traffic study of the above referenced project/study area. Based on this traffic study, we offer the following summary of findings, conclusions and recommendations for your consideration: EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic operations within the study area are generally acceptable. However, the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard/Blake Road/County Road 20. and Blake Road South, currently operates near capacity levels during the peak periods. Background traffic volume growth alone will require the city and county to continue to monitor conditions at this intersection. It should be expected that future traffic control improvements including four -way stop control or traffic control signals will be required. These future traffic control improvements will most likely be required regardless of the issues pertaining to the subject development and the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 -4443 (612) 475-0010 FAX (612) 475 -2429 i Fred Hoisington -2- November 23, 1994 PROPOSED /FUTURE LAND USE ' Traffic generation estimates were made for the proposed/future land use within the study area. They are listed as follows: 91 new homes proposed as part of the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition development 60 new homes (infill) within the existing neighborhoods on lots currently vacant • 400,000 square feet of business park type land use on a redeveloped Hennepin County Public Works site northwest of the Highway 169 and Lincoln Drive interchange. Access from this site to the Lincoln Drive interchange was assumed. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Based on these traffic generation estimates, computer model traffic forecasts were developed for the study area. Three options relative to the extension or connection of Interlachen Boulevard through the Parkwood Knolls development between Malibu Drive and the Green Farms Road area were considered (see Figures 5, 6, and 7). These options include: Option 1 No connection of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive west of Kelsey Lane. Option 2 With a connection of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive through the subject development. Option 3 Same as Option 2 but would include a realignment of Malibu Drive at Lincoln Drive to "disconnect° Malibu Drive from the interchange area, plus improvements on Maloney Avenue to encourage use of that collector street. The results of these traffic forecasts are summarized as follows: Option 1, . Results in the lowest post development volume on Interlachen Boulevard east of the subject development. • Results in the highest diversion of traffic to Maloney Avenue. • Results in a high level of diversion of traffic through the neighborhoods south of the subject development. • Also results in higher "overall" volumes on the other streets through the proposed Parkwood Knolls development. Fred Hoisington - 3 - November 23, 1994 Option 2 • Results in the highest post development volumes on Interlachen Boulevard east of the Parkwood Knolls development. • Results in the lowest diversion of traffic to Maloney Avenue. • Results in generally more evenly distributed traffic volume impacts within.the study area. Option 3 • Does somewhat reduce the volume on Interlachen Boulevard with the connection. • Also diverts slightly more traffic to Maloney Avenue. • Results in generally higher levels of traffic through the neighborhood south of the subject development compared to Option 2. • Would require significant costs to construct with marginal benefit. TRAFFIC ANALYSES Based on an analysis and review of the data collected and developed for this traffic study, the following issues are addressed: 1. A peak hour capacity analysis of a worst case scenario on Interlachen Boulevard between Malibu Drive and Schaefer Road indicates that the existing narrow roadway through the rolling terrain could accommodate the highest forecast traffic volumes at acceptable levels of service. 2. It was assumed for all forecasts and analyses that all -way stop control would be installed on Interlachen Boulevard at Schaefer Road and Green Farms Road. This traffic control would mitigate the sight distance problems in those intersection areas. 3. A concem was raised relative to activity at the Van Valkenburg Play Field and possible impacts to the neighborhoods to the south if an Interlachen Boulevard connection is made. Based on a parking capacity at the park of 210 vehicles and the directional trip distribution assumed for the other land uses within the study area, it is estimated that up to 35 vehicles may use various neighborhood streets to get to the park during the p.m. peak hour. Many of these 35 vehicles may already be using the neighborhood streets to some degree. Fred Hoisington - 4 - November 23, 1994 When this play field traffic is distributed throughout the neighborhood, it should be expected that less than 20 additional vehicles per hour would be added to any specific roadway during the peak hour period from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 4. The only significant safety issues related to the Interlachen Boulevard extension issue involves emergency vehicle response times. If the Interlachen Boulevard connection is not made, some parts of the neighborhood could have emergency response times about two minutes longer than emergency response times would be with a connection. 5. Overall, there were no significant traffic operations problems identified in any of the three options reviewed concerning the Interlachen Boulevard extension issue. Acceptable operational levels of service could be maintained under any of the three options identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this traffic study, the following conclusions and recommendations are offered: 1. Option 2 to include a connection of Interlachen Boulevard between Mailbu Drive and Kelsey Lane provides the. most balanced distribution of traffic impacts throughout the study area. 2. All -way stop control should be considered at the intersections of Interlachen Boulevard at Schaefer Road and Green Farms Road to mitigate the sight distance problems in these areas. This recommendation is made regardless of what Interlachen Boulevard connection option is chosen. 3. Review of other sight distance obstructions along Interlachen Boulevard should include intersection sight distance triangle areas where plant materials and other landscaping features should not obstruct vision between 2.5 and 10 foot heights. Vegetation or foliage causing sight distance obstructions should be trimmed or removed. 4. The city should monitor conditions within the study area, and should traffic operations problems become apparent that appropriate mitigative actions be taken. Complete files containing all the data and analysis used in this traffic study are available for review upon request. Should you have any questions or comments concerning this traffic study, please contact us. IS. .a � ,.,1; •,( ,: :.,ir �P ,,1 , �,. � � E: � ,,;;• 3 ' ` J, =IJ_ ' .L.��,:'�'11;,'��::; ._(;:',� _ t1. r b4. ;•, HOPKINS ° Z :) V R d` i• ` •':'.�, z \a''S ' („ : `j,9 / ` g ` -- .� ei 1990 POP. 16.529 jq Dili% IS- 7 20) W. vu sr, ILIL It. 1.\ J to 7 4 ;: ..a..- — - \_(s!.LoUIS zz PARK 1990 POP. (91';0.•J26' it 11 43 [ 6 4 2100-- C3 34 T 11 io A Q it r Boop U90 01 0 L 2 ZA n­. A"& Al " v I WON 4 C4 J 9 . 10. Kra I-al I • 6i L 9" Y -n 2460 �kJ970 "t vo (S 3 00 CD owl� iE ir �i hwmi, 'am, Y3 aria a- At4900 74400,. 5q5:-- .1K Q. a 16 14 la. MIN 9TONKA CD i. all. leD 14! C) - ! ji 1990 POP. 4 to NETON 111� op. 48.3 10 7 rX f,-M N00 2q \q ;J *0 IM. M. g) IS 06 011A 09 '!,� 2 WC. I -117 z CD 'A i I i. L..1 So 614; O4()T 1. 621 10 7,1 32000 EDINAL A 46.07 a-- =a. -�,8700 r: CA at a,. T. 'k C*l 140 ols WW 4,300, 1 - as. -N 00 ac� S AZN U\� 460. a.— J SaaamaS CK Aj. U. 9 y �ol at v� 42 J? COBS \ ..two .1 IV. a. 366 G..t— a a ('4000 67. , 0 Irp 38 1,: 1c". —s 4300 �A01 140W 1r1... a. .0. 5e ctlotall 5 0 - 19.1LIC ­V, 'a, lar� �"' m. c« i•> �� 1 U1141 - ni civ VOWN S RF T bDY N LOCNT 10Q I WXV"12 V110ULS, / WMAO-IAN 91UP0. -TV_AJWr_ E11UP"? 0 CITY Oe Cd11.1A , mWeWIA S R F LUALYIQ& ALL Mt VNY VMC PA KWOOD KWCJ.Ls / IWIMLACwtl 4 6Wb. "f we S -rwy, 0 V L kNA 7. 0 - - -- ` �y�.,.�GIq�' V gy ♦y,.yi -_/,�5 AV Elf MALONF-Y b 8Oa ���yypppy,,,uN���ppp W y E Rk`R N AVE. visc MT ERLACHEN lc S4�S..lIJ A PLC y L A, � TELE MARK T `. �K � I t A tA A I ERMAN 19( Z43) INT ERLM r�� �o0mmoeeooacw0000�w R c.B s OX W A LA. ,x N aCZO�! FIELD WAY s LA Ov PARKW 00 tLVD. LON0() ER ?R F CItV OF I✓D1111A , MINNel5O.TA SRF X PAP.lCVWt? "S.LS, / 111?F, LACIAtV4 610410, - tWf'IC STUDY 0 . ......... MALONEY AV 6 M50 �'` C��� � 10.1 0 VP d 13....... .....®e. 9.i0 a 2600 ISO 400 _ .� 930 o 0 150£ pgy� w { i�f i £ A PLC 870 LZ ." cr a� LA. wi Ira , S ��8 � pd-890 � 490 a L��. � IX 870 0 0 7q0� u v Ilo(o0 1170. 1 gab ,%Z( 1090 570 . w 11, ' V � y T P wlaow wo:'€3 A 12 0 a 710 700 730 VD P 820 191, �� 0 �A° IDYL' t550 4 oiP76 � DP,- SAX 1210 Io80- �a a 1440 Fl. 1 WAY a 14+00 � P � 190 Rd PARKWOOD LONDONDERRY C11Y OF X1241 A, MINN�•°�D'cP� SRF MbDELM ?1-11541 NU TWr)C PAlexwwD KWOLLS / ►1l1MLAC14tW 5WID. TW*C STUDY E9"P 8a < :D as1 z; cc (n -tk 5x. C) Eby ,.r 3 V1 MALONEY ;ca ova - is }.� �+..� 0 1ti}B r1r. 00 z: M „� 70 TNTERLA( ix3 � � -�IO r�° IflT �:R�..�€ C 2090 ZI00 x r, �-- 100; 240 ,� R..D wows lt, ...s -4 w f A P1, E 1 LA, 1220 �•� FOX MEA LA. 290 g � �'� Ix N 1140 1144 a a.j .... w 1810 131.0,; Ir T LAI ELE -1050 370. q {� > Y ^ 156 1020 740 ) � �... IDYL' 1530 (ow Dpla SAW b � 1040 1i5�- IG r kHA 2010 1470 ° � 7n5) -- Fig.. WAY -� 40 24 �= 4 180 �b f 119 f LA.e e LO QNDERRY 1420 --- u C►TV ap wluA , MIUNtSolo' S� F bi1101J 1 f6mkS PkIN TWIC MSKVOOD 1WOLLS / jVAlM A,04eW SWO. 7KAFr-►C STUDY ly- Ss. ids �. �� • 1t1.1 8-•- fu.. 6s8 Cl A �NEY AV ° a � 2600 9Cio �,( p wpy-(� QQQ sx3 �u/ <0 S3Ja ' L WATFRMAM VP�...w... .. °. ®o. o A- 2bll 570 x ;� � V►11'1�1 COI�I�J�G'f ION � �� {� ���A Ca C3 � V" INTERLM Oo RLACH 1� I(o30 27a r� I30 - 220 S RI.. D s 540 I.A. p F()X MEA all ra O a (oq0 W 6 -2(00 a( 119640 g 5 O M L w TELL M i IZ ' 590 340 °. cj> ' VLSI L T ° 1316 IZ40 a 585 1040 ID 71 O, ,� D yU kHA 1 1790 3p1 WAY Y LA a LA- 7 PARKWOOD � w 1450 .� sA all? OF KQw#, . MIUNem-TA SRF 6FTIW Z FKD3T PNU TWIC rkfx oot? V wd-Ls / 1WIMLAC14ew E'WD. ?Kwlc STUDY VP 8s� L %HA 77 ER. VI CA MALONEY AVIIVn ke 2CM tVATERMAN AVE. $ � • ATERMA N a,....... .....�... �.... Ulm commmilog �� � � � �, 1350 �� x TNTERLA( �T_ • "LACH 2400 �" � 2510 �� � �• o RI30 340+x.. o5. . 4 w' A PLC U.76 LA, 590 '�.� FOX WA LA. c-I - • 710 :51 w Rr, — 7 • I� � • IZ p 1190 5$5 � 750 95 � � DR- SAXOt � � � • IuoO I � ,� 5b5 _ I1gq4��4gg 0 �y�' a ria WAY 3 2410 180 119 ` " � ° 04D K PARKWOOD a " �; 210 �.a � �',� � ,�'��° ,� �•��„�� LO NVERRY a CITY Of, F-OwA , SRF � 6FT16Q 3 fg,,,.tfLq WIC rA,MWwj? K.{ oLLS / jQjMLkCV4tW 61-W. 7KAFr-IC STORY a 1985 HCM:TWO -LANE FACILITY LOCATION.... INTERLACHEN BLVD ANALYST .............. SRF /J.BEDNAR TIME OF ANALYSIS..... PM PEAK HOUR DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 11/22/94 OTHER INFORMATION.... WORST CASE ANALYSIS A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .9 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP /DOWN) .......... 60 / 40 LANE WIDTH ( FT ) ............................. 11 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT:)... 0 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------7------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f, LOS T B R w d - HV - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- A- 4 3 3.2 .65 .94 1 B 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .94 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .94 1 D 5 2.9 3.3 .65 .94 1 .E 5 2.9 3.3 .82 .94 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 160 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 178 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- A 51 .03 B 222 .13 C 479 .28 D 736 .43 E 1942 .9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: B R v \ PROPOSAL FOR RLIVIEtiT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR NORTHVEST EDINA APPROVED P.resentar -= by Planner Planner Larsen indicated that at its meeting of October 3, 1994, the Council \v\ directed staff to interview private consultants and get proposals relative co a review of t` .e Comprehensive Plan for the northwest section of Edina concerning impacts attributable to Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. Proposals were received from c:.o c :nsuicancs. Hoisington Koegier Croup. Inc. and BRW. Inc. Staff would recommend :firing the Hoisington Koeeier Group for the following reasons: i) The _roposai is general:-: more comprehensive in scope and includes meetings with �ail aarcies interested in the proposed development. 2) Strzar Roscoe Fausch ,(SRF) will do the traffic analysis for Hoisington Koeeier. SRF i- a well - respected traffic engineering firm which has no prior experience .n the development of Parkwood Knolls. BRW worked on Parkwood Knolls c:_ffic issues in the 1970's. :Member Pauius asked if Lhe proposed fee of $11,000 from Hoisington Koegler is considered normal for a review of a comprehensive plan and if meetings with the neighborhood prior to presentation to the Planning Commission and City Council was tvpical'. Planner Larsen responded that, based on other studies, the proposed `ee is about t"e going, rate. Further. that meetings with neighborhood represencaz :Ivcs on a comprehensive plan review Jould not be unusual. Public ,:o", ..enc Harvev Hansen. President of Parkwood Knolls Construction, said he was present to clear up a misunderstanding which occurred at the last meeting which he did.noc attend because the development of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition was not on the agenda. ::e said chat approximately three months ago he received a call asking chat he meet with Dale Renner, Ken Durr and Lisa Fish to discuss che.developmenc. At that t: =e he made it clear that he would not discuss having the collector road run through the middle of the property. The misunderstanding occurred when' immediately prior to the Council meeting of October 3, 1994, he was faxed a picture from Jim Ronning and shortly thereafter received a call from Mr. Renner to which he had responded that it looked okay to him. Mr. Hansen.said the problem was he assumed that they remembered what he had said previously about not wanting c!:e road (i.e. Interlachen Boulevard) to run through the middle of the development and assuming there was a cul -de -sac in the west and in the east. :fir. Hansen stated he was not interested in the Ronning proposal Znd that from the beginning he had presented a development proposal which was in conformity with the City's 1978 Comprehensive Plan for this area. He commenced that the people who have objected to exccn7:ng Interlachen Boulevard through would be in the minority when people from earkwood Road and other adjacent areas come forth in support of putting Interlachen through. fie added that spending $11.000 on a new Comprehensive Plan and thereby creating a delay does not make sense. He asked that the property which has received preliminary plat approval be placed on the Council's agenda for final plat approval ac the earliest convenience. Patrick Mantvh. 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, suggested the Comprehensive Plan be reviewed for the same reasons Mr. Hansen did not want it reviewed. i.e. did not want the collector road running through his subdivision because is would devalue the houses to be constructed on his property. Likewise, the neighbors in the area are concerned about the through traffic this road would bring and its dramatic impact on the area. Mr. Mantyh said the only way Co allay the fears of the residents in the neighborhood is to do a comprehensive study and get a firm idea from experts as to the impact of this development and the road on the area. He urged the Council to go ahead with the study. Also speaking in support of the Comprehensive_ Plan review were: Lisa Fish. 5408 f �_arada Lane. Tom Seitz. 0320 Incerlachen Boulevard, Setsv Robinson. 3021 Ridge Road. Ed Glickman. 3217 Schaerer Road. and Mary Seitz. 5320 Interiacaen Boulevard. Roger Anderson, stated. that he was the engineer for the proposed development, and recalled that when the preliminary piat.was approved the Council ordered Mr. Hansen to cc:nDlece a traffic studv for this area to evaluate the impact that the oroiect would have on the neighboring screecs: He told Council that the study :,as been ccmoieced by an independent. competent firm. was done in a professior.�- canner and ias been submitted and reviewed by City staff. he study will be included when the final plat is presented for approval on November 1, 1994. Also included will be a thorough review of the engineering plans by City engineering staff. Council CommenciActi ".ember r :e11•r said she was concerned about the Citv's involvement in the proposed development. e.g. need to widen Incerlachen Boulevard, sewer system. ece., and felt the Council should have ail the facts before them. Member Kelly made a motion to approve the proposal of the Hoisington Koegler Croup. as presented, to complete a reviev of the Comprehensive Plan for the se and infrastructure necessary to northvest Edina area, relative to land u support the proposed Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. :'.otion was seconded by :!ember smith. Member Rice suggested that Mr. Hansen make certain chat a representative of his company be present whenever the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition is discussed so that comments can be verified. Member Rice then asked how this would affect the timing for the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. Planner Larsen pointed out that final engineering data has been submitted and is under review. 1.7hen a determination is made chat all information is complete, the t he `ner has the right to come before Council and request final plat app would then have 60 days in which to act. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus. Rice, Smith. Richards Motion carried. In response co questions of Ms. Robinson. :savor Richards clarified that the Hoisington Koegier Group would be the, one co schedule neighborhood meetings. When the report is finished. is would be presented to the Planning Commission on November 16, 1994, and could be before the Council at the meeting of December 5, 1994. He added that Mr. Hansen may have everything ready to request final plat approval by the Council at its meeting of November 7, 1994: It was noted that a letter dated October 13. 1994, from Carole H. McMorrow, 6504 '.Ji116w Wood Road, was received expreOn concern on the other adjacent streets never have been heard *HF,ARIPC DATE SET FOR PLANATE NATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rica sett ovember 7, 1994, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) Appeal of Board of Appeals ision - 35 foot antenna height variance - generally located in northwe uadrant of Highways 169 and 62. 2) Appeal of Board of Appeals Dec on - .4223 Crimes, one and one -half foot sideyard setback variance. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four es. *AQARD OF BID coATIEi1ED TO NovHMBEtt 7, 1994 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the award of bid for a traffic signal to A Council that on September 7, 1994, the City of Edina was performing a lling operation along West 77th Street and several tenants who had parke ro Pentagon's parking lot had damage to their vehicles. Simultaneously, bull, of work was being done at Pentagon's 4930 building located approximately arter mile away from the area of the milling operation. She said the City Edina is alleging that the substance on the vehicles is from the roofing o tion and not from the milling operation. Ms. Mickelson said that an employe f the roofing company was present to explain the substance they were usin d that several employees of Pentagon Park would also like to make comment. The following individuals spoke regarding thedffmage to their vehicles from'the sticky substance: Thomas Manthei read a st ent of John Noren, Noren Financial Corp, 4640 West 70th Street; Jim Hemann, fice at 4510 Pentagon Park (14399 Bedford Drive, Eden Prairie); and Rust ays, office at 4530 West 77th. Dale Swenson, 9933 Portland Avenue loomington, representing the J.A. Dalsin Roofing Company, stated they wer he roofers working on the building. Weather conditions were mild winds fro he southwest at 10 m.p.h. The damaged cars were due east. He said it would a an act of God for the roofing materials to travel that far at 10 m.p. winds. Mayor Ri/that ed many claims have been filed and if an analysis of the substanc a by an independent laboratory. Assistant to City Manager Smith sai have been received to date and that a professional analysis of the sthe vehicles has not been made. Mayor Richards suggested that in esolve this factual dispute a chemical analysis should be run on one oected vehicles by a testing laboratory. Member Smith said he concurret the City should proceed to get this done even though staff is still to h the insurance company regarding the liability issue. Klelly made a motion directing staff to obtain a chemical analysis of the se on the affected vehicles from an iadependent'testiag laboratory and r ack the results to the Council on October 17, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PETITION TO CUL -DE -SAC INTERLACHEN BOUILr9ARD PRESENTED* CONSIDERATION OF PETITION CONTINUED TO 10/17/94 Dale Renner, 6321 Interlachen Boulevard, presented a (� v petition signed by approximately 100 individuals asking the Council to cul -de -ac \J Interlachen Boulevard, thereby eliminating any direct through traffic from Highway 169 to the Blake /Interlachen interchange. Mr. Renner said he would:' 1) review the key points of the petition, 2) present an alternative plan, and 3) conclude with seven reasons why this would serve the best interest of both the community and the business objectives of the developer. He told Council that he had been in contact with the developer. Harvey Hansen, and the plan is acceptable to Mr. Hansen in concept. Mr. Renner called attention to the following key points in the petition: 1. The direct connection westward of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive and thence to four lane Highway 169 will cause traffic volume beyond the capacity of the present width of Interlachen west of Blake Road. 2. Concern that the road will eventually be widened to accommodate the increased traffic flow by using portions of the City's 60 foot roadway easement (up to 17.5 feet on both the north and south sides of Interlachen and put a burden on residences on both sides of Interlachen west of Blake Road and place a grossly inequitable burden on the long established Interlachen properties west of Blake Road to accommodate the new r. development and potential development in Hopkins. 2. The developer, Ilarvev Hansen, has publicly stated many times that he does not care whether or not Interlachen connects directly to Malibu Drive. 4. In all of the Council meetings concerning this issue the many residents and neighbors have been very vocal in their opposition to a direct connection between Interlachen and Malibu. 5. Because Malibu was granted a cul -de -sac at its southern end, Lincoln Drive was successfully cul -de -sated at the north end of the southern section and at the south end of the northern section, consistent planning calls. for the cul -de- sating of Interlachen. Mr. Renner said that in the current plan Interlachen Boulevard would be extended westerly from the Interlachen /Blake area past Kelsey Terrace and then take a 90 degree southerly turn before connecting to Malibu Drive. The alternative plan suggested by the petition would cul -de -sac Interlachen Boulevard at two points, i.e. the area before the 90 degree turn on the current plan and a short section off of Malibu Drive to service the lots affected by cul- de- sating the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. As a result, westbound through traffic on Interlachen would need to proceed down Kelsey Terrace to Woodsage Drive and then turn west to connect to Malibu Drive. Mr. Renner said the petitioners believe this alternative plan would be in keeping with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and would meet the best interests of the community and of the developer for these reasons: A. It minimizes traffic impact of the immediate area of Interlachen Boulevard and Parkwood Knolls. B. It supports traffic associated with the development. C. It eliminates need for Interlachen Boulevard widening. D.. It provides. ingress and egress in all directions (southeast, northeast and northwest). E. It supports notion of equitable distribution of traffic in community. F. It supports delivery of all services to residents (plowing, street maintenance, emergency vehicles, etc.). G. It creates no double frontage lots. In addition, . the developer has said he believes that the value of his land will actually increase because he will noc have to deal with increased traffic on Interlachen Boulevard. Kr. Hansen has said he will consider this type of plan ort. On behalf of the change if, in fact, the Council states their supp petitioners, Mr. Renner asked the Council to approve the alternative plan. In conclusion, Mr. Renner said the community is more than willing to accept an equitable share of the traffic associated with the new development but are vehemently opposed to the additional traffic associated with Highway 169 that no one wants or needs. The alternative plan does not preclude persons from coming through if, they chose, but does not invite them to come through. Speaking in support of the petition and alternative plan were Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road; Tom Seitz, 6320 Interlachen Boulevard; Patrick Mantyh, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard; Mike Allen, 6404 Willow Wood Road; Charles Bohlig, 5200 Ridge Road; Lisa Fish, 5408 Larada Lane; Chuck Webster, 6645 Interlachen Boulevard; Jim Ronning, 6416 Inter.lachen Boulevard; Ed Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road; David Sapila, 5205 Ridge Road; Mike Miller, 6328 Interlachen Boulevard; Bernie Nelson, 5008 Schaefer Road; and Wayne Packard, 4909 Prescott Circle. Mayor Richards asked Manager Rosland to explain the City's procedure on petitions. Manager Rosland explained that the normal procedure is for the Council - -to refer the petition to staff for review and recommendation and then decision or action by the Council. Member Smith stated that, while he was sympathetic to the concerns about through traffic, he was not ready to tell Mr. Hansen or any other developer that he would support a proposal that has not been presented to the Council by the developer. Mayor Richards commented that, while he believed the City has done a good job of planning, a lot of information has come to the Council since 1978. This may be an opportune time to stop and look at the City's Comprehensive Plan. The one issue on which there is consensus is that this area be developed as a single - family neighborhood. He observed that the issue of how the traffic will flow into and out of this area and the impact on the surrounding neighborhood and the greater community may need to be looked at by a consultant so that the Council has the full picture. Member Rice recalled that Mr. Hansen was asked to do a traffic study on the area at the time of preliminary approval. Manager Rosland said it would not include tonight's proposal. Member Rice said he would. not object to including the alternative plan presented in any traffic study of the area and to then look at that, but that he was not prepared to go on record at this time as supporting the specifics of the petition. Member Kelly said she agreed with the suggestion made by Mayor Richards for staff to rethink the Comprehensive Plan and have the traffic issue examined by an outside consultant. Beyond the traffic issue, she said there are enough other issues, i.e. potential Hopkins development, safety, emergency vehicle access, and the City's involvement in widening of Interlachen as it comes out to Blake Road that need to be considered as this land is developed. Member Smith asked if, by stopping the process to look at the Comprehensive. Plan for this area, we would be creating a problem. Planner Larsen explained that once preliminary plat approval has been granted it is the property owner's call when he is ready to seek final plat approval. Specifically, Mayor Richards asked if perchance Mr. Hansen came in for final plat approval at the next meeting and the Council voted to continue the action for approval for, say, nine months because the Council was in the process of looking at the Comprehensive Plan would the Council have created a problem. Planner Larsen said the developer has waived the normal 120 day period for the Council to act but he could not respond as to the duration the Council may legally delay action. Member Smith made a motion to continue this matter and refer the petition to cul- de -sac Interlachen Boulevard to staff with the directive to come back on October 17, 1994, with information on hiring an outside planning consultant to assist City staff in reviewing the Comprehensive Plan relative to land use and infrastructure necessary to support the proposed Parkwood Knolls development.. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPAR FOR PROCESSING Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member a to refer the petition for street lighting on the south side of Maloney.Avenue ross from the yard at 6938 to the Engineering Department for processin Motion carried on rollcall vote ft yes TEE EDINA FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEPUMS OQLEDGED The Council acknowledged receipt of The Edina Foundation Financial St ments for Years Ended June 30, 1994 and 1993. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 18, 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Membe th and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the Council Cons Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PROCLAMATION ADOPTED - LIBRARIES CHANGAMEMS VEEK Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member PaulZT1NC nimously for adoption of a Proclamation announcing July 25, 199es Change Lives Week in Edina. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF TILE REGULAR UNE 20 1994 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was nded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the regular Council Meet of June 20, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - Eive ayes. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR PARK`TOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION - (OUTLOT A. PARK`TOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner.Larsen clarified that under agenda item II.A the request is for preliminary plat approval only with no rezoning requested for the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition plat. Agenda item II.B - Request to Amend Comprehensive Land Use Plan, is directly related to the plat proposal. However, this request is different from the plat proposal and is not being requested by the proponent but by InterlachenjParkwood Knolls Coalition, ,a group of residents in the subject area. Planner Larsen reminded Council that this is a 53 acre plat of undeveloped land in greater Parkwood Knolls bounded on the west by Malibu Drive, on the south by Parkwood Road, on the east by Green Farms Road and by Van Valkenburg Park on the north. At its meeting of May 16, 1994, the Council considered and continued the proposed plat for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition to allow the developer to address the concerns and comments made. At that time the proposed development included 16 townhouse units, seven zero lot line single dwelling units and 72 single dwelling lots. A revised preliminary plat has been presented eliminating the townhouses and zero lot line lots. The revised plat now illustrates 91 single dwelling unit lots which is consistent with the overall plan approved in 1978 for this tract of land. In addition to the land use changes there are a number of other changes to the street system and lots within the plat: 1) Interlachen Boulevard continues westerly to connect to Malibu Drive, but with a revised alignment. The revised plan contains two sharp curves, one of which approaches 90 degrees. In order to provide a 90 degree turn, a small land trade between the City and the proponent would be needed. 2) The revised plan does not.illustrate townhouses or zero lot line lots, but contains some smaller single dwelling lots along the Interlachen frontage. , / i0/ J� 4 Host of these lots are 85 to 95 feet wide, which compares to a 75 foot lot width for zero lot line dots on Malibu Drive. 3) The revised plan provides direct access to Van Valkenourg Park from Interlachen Boulevard. 4) The revised plan eliminates the through lots (double street frontage) along Malibu Drive which were on the earlier plan. 5) The proposed phasing of the development has changed from the earlier plan. Phase I woui d now include the construction of Interlachen Boulevard and the development of lots fronting on the street. Phase II would involve the westerly portion of the site ircludi: -e streets labeled Cougar Court and Cougar Trail. In staff's opinion, the revised plan provides -•nection to the existing road -rstem to the southeast, the northeast and the : :est. The total number of :s the same as in the 1978 plan. The proposed -Dad system is similar to the •n. The proposed preliminary plat does not require a rezoning or an art',._ the Comprehensive Plan. Planner _ said staff would recommend approval of the' revised overall development plan and preliminary plat approval for Phase I of the development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat approval. 2. Developer's Agreement covering publi- imppovements. 3. Watershed district grading permit. 4. Wetlands alteration permit, as required. Planner Larsen concluded by referring to a memorandum dated July 15, 1994, from City En: -man stating that the revised plan had been reviewed by the Engineer: and commenting on concerns relative to the extension and design of Interi -cnen Boulevard. Roger Anderson, Roger A. Anderson & Associates, stated he was the civil engineer for the proponent, Harvey Hansen, and they had nothing further to add at this time. He said the Planning staff has worked with them over the past two months to refine the plan and the City Planner has done a good job in explaining the changes and ti:e rational for those changes. He said they are essentially.back to the 1978 plan that was. approved for this parcel. Member Rice asked about the phasing for the proposal. Mr. Anderson responded that the revised plat depicts each phase as a concept. It is the developer's intention to resolve the Interlachen Road issue and to proceed with Phase I according to the four conditions recommended by the Planning Department. Phase II may be extended to the summer of 1995. Development of the remaining parcel has not been -� termined at this time but the intent is to develop the remaining portion as illustrated. Public C, t George .r, 4917 Ridge Road, told Council that there is an 18 foot drop in grade f_evation between his property ar.^ the Fink property (9 percent grade) which reduces visibility for drivers. said he was concerned about the pocential for an accident from the addi. -ial traffic that could shortcut through the r._�ighborhood from Highway 169. He L since Maloney Avenue, located two blocks north of Interlachen Boulevard, al=_=dy functions as a collector street making Interlachen a through street dges noc make sense. Dale Renner, 6321 Interlachen Boulevard, said he was co -chair of the Interlachen /Parkwood Knolls Coalition. He said the current plan does not support the best interests of the established neighborhood. No one wants the increased traffic resulting from connecting Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. The i / 10/ `i4 neighborhood is not concerned about the traffic generated by the new homes in the development but is concerned about the current number of vehicles on Highway 169 that could easily connect over via Interlachen and Blake Road if Interlachen is made a collector street. The established neighborhood should not have to carry an inordinate amount of traffic burden for a development that has no residents today. The plan also represents a totally avoidable increase danger to their homes and families: studies have shown the impact of traffic in relation to crime. It is unclear how this particular plan benefits the developer and /or the City over some other more acceptable configuration. The coalition would recommend to Council: 1) do not approve the current plan, 2) require a meeting between the neighborhood and the developer to discuss options that all can live with, and 3) change the Comprehensive Plan to provide a circuitous route for Interlachen Boulevard and not connect directly to Malibu.Drive. He suggested a number of alternatives to connecting Interlachen directly with Malibu Drive. Lisa Fish, 5408 Larada Lane, agreed that development will occur on this parcel and the densitv is not the issue. She said the concern for all is the roads and the increased outside traffic that will be brought into the area. The quality of, homes in the established neighborhood is high, there is very little crime and it is safe. She urged the Council not to change that and said neither the new homes or the established neighborhood will benefit with the proposed connection of Interlachen thru to Malibu Drive. Cindy Witkin, 5112 Ridge Road, said she witnessed a car nearly hit a child who was rollerblading at the intersection of Interlachen /Blake Road. The trees, narrowness of the road, and speed all were contributors to the near accident. This potential will only increase if Interlachen Boulevard is put thru. She said she had not heard one compelling reason to put Interlachen through to Malibu Drive but has heard many reasons to not put it thru. Ms. Witkin said a poll of her neighborhood indicated that if the road is put thru they will all use it to get to Highway 169. She concluded that this discussion could end if another way was found to route traffic through the neighborhood. Peter Simpson, 509 Blake Road, commented that Interlachen and Blake Road is a terrible intersection. The concern is if Interlachen is put thru it will be a short cut to Highway 169 and the increased traffic will eventually result in widening of the road by the county. If Interlachen is put thru, he said funds should be allocated to build a safer intersection at Blake and Interlachen. He suggested that the development maintain short, serpentine streets much like the surrounding area. Bob Froemming, 4930 Interlachen Court, said he agreed with everything that has been said about traffic congestion. He questioned whether anyone present does not consider Interlachen now as a main thoroughfare from Highway 100 to Hopkins. 'He asked where else in Edina is there a road where cars travel so fast for over two miles without a STOP sign. If Interlachen Boulevard is put thru to Malibu Drive he said it will reroute the cars from the present Interlachen /Blake intersection thru the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. Nancy Webster, 6645 Interlachen Boulevard, voiced two objections to the proposed plat. First, was the number and location of the small lots. They understood when they built five years ago that the development to the west would have homes similar in size and value to those on Green Farms Road, Interlachen Court and Interlachen Circle, i.e. traditional, single family homes on 1/2 to 3/4 acre lots with a corresponding tax structure. She said that the location of the smaller lot homes. (1/4 acre) would not be consistent with the original plan for this area and would considerably change the character of the immediate neighborhood and lower property values. She suggested that a limited number of smaller lot homes be constructed on the westerly portion of the development where there are double C t i / J6/ ;'4 6 bungalows an d zero lot line homes already. Logically: the lots should increase in size as you move east within the proposed subdivision. Second, was to reinforce how dangerous Interlachen Boulevard will be if it is allowed to be a thru street with the increase in traffic that this will bring. She emphasized that Interlachen is particularly dangerous going east in winter when ice builds up at the intersections. She urged the Council to give serious consideration to the plan suggested by the neighborhood coalition whereby Interlachen would not be a thru street and would only handle the traffic from the new homes. Molly Marinovich, 6517 Stauder Circle, said she was part of the Parkwood Knolls group, and they are opposed to any plan that would bring increased traffic to their neighborhood. She urged Council to consider the alternative plan as presented by the coalition. Inerid Mantvh, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, voiced support for the neighborhood plan that was presented. She said there is a question of philosophy here - this country is strewn with neighborhoods developed sloppily and without any effort to preserve the habitat and priorities of the families already living there. She said we should do better and it is time to cake a stand nor it. Joseph Tarry, 3109 Ridge Road, indicated that the area has narrow streets, hills, and no sidewalks and were designed for Light traffic. Connecting Interlachen thru would be a disaster for the new development as well as the existing neighborhoods. Tom Seitz, 6320 Interlachen Boulevard, said he was vehemently opposed to the revised plan regarding Interlachen Boulevard. He said the 90 degree curve would impact the development specifically but would not do much to enhance the existing condition of Interlachen. Also, if the ingress /egress to Van Valkenburg Park is located near the curve, it will be difficult for any activity there. He submitted that if there was opportunity for dialogue between the neighborhood coalition, the developer and the City, to come up with a proper proposal that would affect everyone positively it could be a win /win situation and would take the 'us' versus 'them' out of the formula. Mary Seitz, 6320 Interlachen Boulevard, pointed out that they live on the edge of the pond and are the first house to see the traffic coming west on Interlachen. There is a lot of disrespectful traffic including construction /building trucks whose attitude seems to be 'this is not my neighborhood'. If Interlachen Boulevard is opened up to the west it will invite more of this type of non- - neighborhood traffic. Jim Ladner, 4931 Green Farms Road, spoke to issues in his letters of April 23,. 1994 and July 11, 1994: 1) The deceased Carl Hansen, original developer, had told him that the idea of extending Interlachen'to the west was conceptual and that prior to replatting the remaining land it was his plan to alter the plat to eliminate a thru route to the west. 2) Present traffic on Interlachen Boulevard currently travels in excess of 30 MPH; a thru street would be an additional hazard to children and neighborhood walkers. 3) Logically the density should be reduced to 108 fewer single family units rather than increasing the density. 4) Develop a plan that will divide the access for future residents equally between north, south, east and west. He urged the Council to deny the plan as proposed by the developer. Terry Swanson, 6501 Interlachen Boulevard, observed t`:at although the neighborhood has changed over the 13 years she has lived there, it still has retained some of its original character. She said the traffic pattern will create a significant change in the neighborhood and urged the Council to respect the residents already living in the area. 1/10/94 Wayne Packard, 4909 Prescott Circle, said that with recent development in the area the traffic has increased considerably and will only grow because drivers will try to avoid the meters on the highways. He asked if.the developer is required to estimate the amount of traffic generated by a new development. He said that although he was in favor of the proposed development, he was apprehensive about other traffic that may be generated because of this plan. Floyd Kuehnis, 4926 Interlachen Court, said he echoed everything that has been said in opposition to the proposed plan. In order to resolve the issues, he suggested that the developer meet with the neighborhood to allow for some input in the process as opposed to one way presentations. Robert Rusnak, 6232 Idylwood Lane, made the following points: 1) the residents in attendance care about what happens to their neighborhood, 2) all are opposed to any degradation of their neighborhood (decreasing lot size, increasing population density, increasing traffic in neighborhood), 3) the character of the neighborhood should be maintained, i.e. low traffic pattern, cul -de -sacs. He concluded by saying that any proposal for this parcel should be consistent with the existing neighborhood. Nancy Diele, 5608 Interlachen Boulevard, said she has lived there for 30 years and has seen animals and a child die on Interlachen Boulevard. As a resident on the eastern part of the road, she cautioned against the potential bottleneck at Interlachen /Vernon from the increased traffic and said they have to use it on a daily basis. Bernie Nelson, 5008 Schaefer Road, stated he has not heard any reason why Interlachen Boulevard needs to go thru. He said traffic at Interlachen and Blake backs up at various times during the day now and can only get worse if the road is put thru. He concluded by objecting to putting "Interlachen thru. . Mattie Greif, 6629 Parkwood Road, said that previously she believed the residents on Interlachen were overstating concerns about traffic until she remembered what has happened in her area since Malibu went through and now believed their concerns are valid. Response for Proponent Roger Anderson responded that the comments of the neighborhood have not fallen on deaf ears. He pointed out that the process to this point has taken many months to develop the plat within the guidelines of the City's Comprehensive Plan which shows Interlachen as a collector street going thru. The developer has offered some concessions: 1) a sharp curve in the roadway, 2) grade changes, 3) lower density, and 4) the zoning request was dropped. Harvey Hansen, proponent, said this is the final 53 acres of the 600 acres his father, Carl Hansen, purchased in 1949 -50 and they, have done a good job in developing it. In 1977 -78 the Comprehensive Plan was discussed as it related to this parcel and the City wanted to see three things done: 1) Extension of Malibu Drive (accomplished). 2) Park property (accomplished). 3) Extension of Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Hansen said they were opposed to the extension of Malibu Drive to Lincoln Drive. The City's purpose was to spread the traffic out, hence Malibu Drive went thru and Interlachen Boulevard was 'designated to go thru which was a matter of public record. Council Comment /Action Member Smith asked if there would be a problem with making Interlachen Boulevard circuitous by crossing Cougar Court over to Cougar Trail an alternative. Planner Larsen said there might be some grade changes to consider. Member Kelly asked Planner Larsen to speak to the Comprehensive Plan which showed Interlachen connecting to Malibu Drive. Planner Larsen said this started in 1974 and concluded in 1978 when the plan was adopted showing Interlachen connected to Malibu. At that time the Council looked at the entire neighborhood and decided, on a basis of equity for all, that there should be as many ingressiegress points for the neighborhood as possible. Malibu Drive to Lincoln Drive was one, Interlachen is another and in 1978 Ridge Road was connected to the Parkwood Knolls area. The basis for the decision at that time was equity, although delivery of services, (plowing, street maintenance, emergency vehicle access) probably-was part of the decision. Member Rice asked if ingress /egress to the park was a legitimate concern and if Interlachen is connected to Malibu, what could be done to discourage thru traffic. Planner Larsen said that a plan for a possible park and access has not yet been developed. He referred to suggestions made by the City Engineer that would both slow traffic and increase driving time to discourage thru traffic. Mayor Richards reflected that Edina is a community that includes all people, rather than excluding people. He said he would resist an attempt to exclude people and if. such a philosophy were adopted Edina would be less desirable than it is today. All would agree that neighborhoods should not be adversely impacted, but to develop exclusive neighborhoods has never worked. Credit should be given to prior councils who set the theme of how Edina should be developed. Mayor Richards said he believed the developer did listen to the suggestions at the last meeting, that the revised plan is responsive, that the density of 1.7 units per acre is consistent with much of northwestern Edina and the road configuration as proposed will provide circulation for this area of the City. He concluded by saying he would support the plan as presented. Roger Anderson answered Member Smith that his suggestion of connecting Interlachen Boulevard through Cougar Court to Cougar Trail would not follow the Comprehensive Plan and would create a number of double frontage lots which are not allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Member Rice said he had great confidence in the way Edina has been developed and ~e results.achieved so far. Edina has been recognized as one of the-best planned communities which consistently has held its property values. Most of the residents live here because they are concerned about their biggest investment - their homes. He said some of the comments made have reminded him of a billboard advertising "Minnesota's First Gated Community" and hoped Edina has not come to .that. Concerning Interlachen Boulevard, Member Rice said he believed that thru traffic could be contained by some disincentives. Member Rice said this developer has done a good job in developing the Parkwood Knolls area, but he had some concern about when the subsequent phases of this development would occur. He said he would support the proposal but would ask staff to build in sufficient disincentives on Interlachen if it is extended. Member Smith said he had no problem with the proposal as to lot size but questioned why the Comprehensive Plan has to be followed to put Interlachen thru to Malibu Drive. Mayor Richards responded that this property will develop with a minimum of 91 units and the burden of the additional traffic coming from the development should be distributed equally by providing ingress and egress in all directions. Member Kelly said she was disappointed that the developer has not met with the neighborhood and encouraged that this be done. While eliminating the townhouses from the development is a positive, she felt that all the lots in should be 7/18/94 consistent in size, e.g. 1/2 to 3/4 acre as most of Parkwood Knolls has been developed. Member Kelly said she concurred with the Comprehensive Plan and the extension of Interlachen Boulevard thru to Malibu for public safety reasons and for service reasons as was the intent.- She indicated support for preliminary . plat approval; however, the plan should be completed as to each phase before she could support final approval. Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing so that: l) the developer could present a complete plan-for all 91 lots, and 2) staff and the developer consider. an alternative road configuration for Interlachen with no connection to Malibu, and 3) a study be done on traffic from the proposed development. Motion was seconded by:Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith Nays: Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion defeated. Member Rice moved preliminary plat approval for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition, subject to: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Developer's agreement, 3) Watershed District grading permit, 4) Wetlands alteration permit as required,. 5) Developer submitting a detailed plan for phasing of the development, and 6) A traffic study of traffic generated by the development and alternatives for traffic distribution, cost of which to be the responsibility of the developer. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. Mayor Richards encouraged the developer to meet with neighborhood residents to allow a free exchange of information between all parties concerned. (Member Rice asked to be excused from the meeting at this point on the agenda because of a family death.) NO ACTION TAKER ON REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN In conjunction with the discussion on the preliminary plat for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition, no action was taken on the request from the Parkwood Knolls Coalition to change the existing language in the Comprehensive Plan concerning the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. TI S Affidavits of Noti Member Paulus stated that this matter. Presentation by City Attorney City Attorney Gilligan advised t was discovered that a portion of Addition (6900 Cornelia Drive) The City Engineer has confirme Cornelia and is located "in the the pipe to the garage staff of the easement but authorize continue subject to certain c d, approved and ordered placed on file. articipate in the discussion or vote on u a recent real estate transaction it gara n Lot 15, Block 1, Southdale First ncroachi ver a City storm sewer easement. at a 54 inch rm pipe going into Lake sement area. Be a of the close proximity of recommend that.th ty not vacate any portion agreement that would it the encroachment to tions: 1) No work would be done the garage that would damage the City's storm sewer pipe or further roach on the City's easement, 10 2) The homeowner would indemnify and hold the City harmless trom any additional costs as a result of the encroachment which the-City may incur in connection with any repair or reconstruction of the storm sewer pipe, and 3) If the garage were ever destroyed or removed, no further encroachment over the easement area would be permitted. This agreement that would be recorded in the real estate records and run with_the land. The title company working with the homeowner has agreed that this type of consent would clear up the title. Discussion followed on whether item 3 would prevent the homeowner from rebuilding the garage if destroyed or removed. Attorney Gilligan said that condition could be left out if the other two conditions were in place. Member Kelly made a motion directing the City Attorney to draft an agreement for Council approval, to be recorded and run with the land, whereby the City would consent to the encroachment of the garage on the easement area provided that: (i) no work would be done to the garage that would damage the City's storm sever pipe or further encroach on the City's easement, and (ii) the homeowner vould indemnify and hold the City harmless from any additional costs as a result of the encroachment which the'City may incur in connection with any repair or reconstruction of the storm sever pipe. Ayes:, Kelly, Smith, Richards Abstaining: Paulus Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -6 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTIONS 1200 AND 1230 TO PERMIT SIDEYALR CAFES ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Assistant Manager Hughes recalled that on July 5, 1994, the City Council granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 1994 -6 which provides a permit process for sidewalk cafes. The Council directed staff to include certain revisions to the ordinance. The revisions have now been made and staff would recommend Second Reading and adoption as amended and presented. Mayor Richards called for comment or discussion on the ordinance. No comment or objections was heard. Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1994 -6 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1200 AND 1230 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT SIDPALK CAFES TELE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS-0- Section-1. Subd. 2 of Subsecti 60.02 of Section 1200 of the City Code is amended by adding a new paragraph:. as follows: of this Code subject ^Q. Sidewalk cafes as defined by Subsection 1230.01 to a permit issued pursuant:to,.Subsection 1230.07 of this Code." Section 2. Subsection -1230..01 of Section 1230 of the City Code is amended by adding'a, new definition'as follows: "Sidevaik Cafe. ..Tables, chairs, benches and appurtenant equipment located on a sidevalke(i) for the exclusive use by patrons of an abutting food establishment as defined by Section 720 of this Code, or (ii) where the service cgVfood or beverages is offered to persons using such tables, chairs, and benches." RECEIVED 02210 October 28, 1994 Mr. Craig Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson, I live at 6517 Willow Wood Road in Parkwood Knolls. My home also is bordered on the side by Kelsey Terrace where it deadends into the property proposed for development by Harvey Hanson. In 1988, my husband and I looked at a piece of property owned by Mr. Kenneth Durr on the cul -de -sac near the Fink home just off of and facing Interlachen Boulevard. We had Mr. Durr begin to consider plans for a home and abandoned our interest in the lot as soon as we learned that there was a plan in place with the City of Edina to connect Interlachen through to highway 169. We simply did not wish to live on a collector level street. With this in mind, we chose to build the home at 6517 Willow Wood. I believe that the homeowners now living on Interlachen Boulevard bought their homes with full knowledge, or full accessiblility to knowledge that Interlachen would one day be connected to highway 169. 1 am not a real estate agent, but I think it is common knowledge that a home on a collector street would have less value than the same home on a quiet residential street. I would like to have the following questions answered: 1) Why would the City Council feel justified in improving the home values and neighborhood aesthetics for a small group of homeowners who: a) bought there knowing that the highway would eventually come b) got a "discount" on the purchase price of their homes because of it to begin with, and c) are unhappy now that it is coming to pass and they want to have their cake and eat it too? 2) Why would the City Council feel justified in satisfying the noisiest group by damaging the quiet ones who have been trusting the council to be good for it's word, as given in the 1977 -78 Comprehensive Plan which was the basis for all the surrounding area residents' for selection of property and influential in determining the value of that property. In other words, we paid a premium to live away from Interlachen and now you are going to change the plan, devaluing our home, hurting our resaleability, and destroying the quietness of the neighborhood we have paid such high taxes to live in. (...raise the value and aesthetics of the lesser valued property by destroying the value of the property that cost more to begin with ? ? ? ?) I have trusted the Edina City Council to stick to its plans as stated and I am dismayed that it has even come to the point where I need to write this letter. A home is usually (certainly in our case) a person's most valuable financial asset and to have that threatened is not something one expects in Edina. I am song that the folks on Interlachen are upset with progress going forward as planned, but I do not feel it is right or just for our home to be unnecessarily devalued in order to quell their regrets for living on the planned highway connection. I expect to share_ neighborhood traffic as would be normally generated with the building of new homes in the area and would look forward to seeing the area completed. Mr. Hanson would be wise, to maximize the desireablility of his own new development, by finding a way for the new homes to access the highway as far to the north as possible. I would consider it responsible if. Mr. Hanson were to design Interlachen to curve'enough to discourage "drivethroughs" when the connection to Malibu is made. It is my express hope that the Edina City Council will hold to its commitments of 1977 -78 and connect Interlachen to Malibu as planned so many years ago. Very truly yours, rZt i L. awn Kerrison 6517 Willow Wood Road Parkwood Knolls WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994, AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name (Print) Address Signature /Date Rd VWt - -L LL7=— 1 CC. L4 Y a t d.,t4, z ke Lbf Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON. DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date E 4Lt LC v _jQC� Q �:S I, ,�,'; i Irw; `' is b'I L(Z 2 17 LLI, C L7 A-j LW LA LV l (l/ V� Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON. DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date JLI %I 1 � � I�Ct )►i.)ll E �� '•t�� ICt� ►U 0 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: j Name(Print) r'c� ` ccocc re Address Signature/Date /A/4 U3 ( 71 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO -CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date Liz Ay L�4y �arltwaod Rcl LO 131 /1 j � C I U3 Attachment to Dawn K6rrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature/Date U Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Dale Y / /'G, /Vii? �• �c'c:.: ,'S J'vi,.,` �•�c�.:.c4..., .5 c_s... �/�/ /_.�s�..� L / cL'�`' % ,�y�,�Y U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date fflarrQref ��. of/14 nn a (o (02o 0,- l <u)oo d 4d �. /,� ti v • 3� 9 s z vj e� % Zv M I ' 5 y5 (o2a P4rleLao oc q vkwcv L�; ., �O .S /o -3►-94 U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date i -5 1 i'1112j< (c c & ) A D . U3. Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date V. T � 1 U3 - Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /da� Y�w71L� M,� G;- :,ht�'�'"1 �c b LY' 1 "M'.,KU.:�o ►�?. Cam.^' U3. Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date ?�- �/y� r U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date _ 3 C; li Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: . Name(Print) Address Signature /Date Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Edge Signature /Date 1 .ICU 7 U3 U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print). „ Address, ,; Signature /Date y Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date Cl I If U3 '. U3. Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date t l i . r'' � y _, (.0 t pa v �-\Aja0J /Q 7. LvTttr ' AMU � �Af C2) am dismayed that it has even come to the point where I need to write this letter. A home is usually (certainly in our case) a person's most valuable financial asset and to have that threatened is not something one expects in Edina. I am sorry that the folks on Interlachen are upset with progress going forward as planned, but I do not feel it is right or just for our home to be unnecessarily devalued in order to quell their regrets for living on the planned highway connection. I expect to share neighborhood traffic as would be normally generated with the building of new homes in the area and would look forward to seeing the area completed. Mr. Hanson would be wise, to maximize the desireablility of his own new development, by finding a way for the new homes to access the highway as far to the north as possible. I would consider it responsible if Mr. Hanson were to design Interlachen to curve enough to discourage "drivethroughs" when the connection to Malibu is made. It is my express hope that the Edina City Council will hold to its commitments of 1977 -78 and connect Interlachen to Malibu as planned so many years ago. Very truly yours. Dawn Kerrison 6517 Willow Wood Road Parkwood Knolls WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994, AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name (Print) Address Signature /Date 7bM Lt� F b--Va Lcz� &rL LL h ye S �t�cl r�d� ,may �u �,�r�e. id 1Z Iq CL I. Cl.� vil, , �,7 U Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) . Address Signature /Date I` �w.c� s wssa� sus sue. A�•-r- �% o�t5 �U Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date -;UZMI F— ,� L'tJsN b(c/+D PARKtCOW 0. -94 U ��U3,,. Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date U3 Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name (Print) Address Signature /Date �Wdt4"kg- 6 ,45 P Ed-, a KAsK'4 6i ys Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date 11191101/921.58 Fax from Kathleen D. Brooks M.D. Papa 1 of 1 November 30, 1994 Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen, We understand there is a Planning Commission meeting tonight which will consider amending the Comprehensive Plan as it applies to the Northwest quadrant of the City, to the planned extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive, and to the designation of Interlachen Road as a Collector Street. We live at 6225 Parkwood Road, one house in from the corner of Schaeffer Road and Parkwood Road. Our children, ages 8 and 12, wait for their school busses on this comer. We have always noted a fair amount of morning traffic on this corner and along Parkwood Road. We understand that if the Comprehensive Plan is amended, traffic in the Harvey Hansen Development of 91 homes would not be routed along Interlachen Boulevard as originally planned when we purchased our home. Instead, this traffic would need to come through our neighborhood, and significantly to us, would come through the Schaeffer Road and Parkwood Road intersection. We write to ask the Planning Commission to take our needs into account as they consider this amendment. it appears that to decrease the traffic for residents on Interlachen Road we will have an increased traffic pattern in an already busy enough location. This was not our understanding of what would happen with this new construction when we bought our house here in 1991. We would like to see the Planning Commission vote to keep the Comprehensive Plan unchanged the completion of the planned extension of Interlachcn Road to Malibu Drive and to the designation of Interlachen Road as a Collector Street. Sincerely, Marvin and Kathleen Brooks 6225 Parkwood Road Edina, MN. 55436 931 -0114 November 15, 1994 Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: As residents of Parkwood Knolls, we are very concernced about the traffic and safety of our neighborhood. Since we moved into our home on View Lane two years ago, we have been alarmed at the volume of traffic on our street, as well as the speed of the vehicles. The safety of our school age children and others in the neighborhood is in jeopardy because of this problem. Additional traffic onto View Lane would only increase the problem. As residents, we would like to voice our strong approval and support of the City of Edina in it's preliminary approval of the proposed Hansen development which opens Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu. We are opposed to the Coalition's counter proposal which closes Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu, thus directing all traffic through the south end of Parkwood Knolls. This would impact our lives and the safety of our children greatly. Our street and neighborhood need to remain safe; please help us keep them that way. Sin erely, Katherine Grumstrup and Michael Bing 5717 View Lane Edina, Minnesota 55436 cc: Fred Richards Peggy Kelly Jack Rice Glenn Smith Jane Paulus PARKWOOD KNOLLS PROPOSAL TELEPHONE LOG DATE COMMENTS 10/26/94 Pat Teynor, 5525 Malibu Drive. Extend Interlachen Boulevard. Consider placing Stop signs on both sides Telemark at Malibu. Sand better in the winter on Telemark. 10/26/94 Judy Malvez and Family, 5409 Malibu Drive. In favor of Interlachen Boulevard connecting with Malibu Drive. 10/26/94 James Ewald, 5523 Malibu Drive. No problem with Interlachen Boulevard connecting with Malibu Drive. Irritated with special interest group. Should go through as planned. 10/26/94 Heather Tielrangelo, 5227 Green Farms Road. Safety issue for young kids on bikes, crime will increase due to easy access to 169, increased traffic in her neighborhood. Opposed to extending Malibu Drive. 10/27/94 Robin Nelson, 5180 Malibu Drive. Wants Interlachen connected to Malibu Drive as in present city plans. 10/27/94 Tom Student, 6613 Parkwood Road. Favors connecting Interlachen Boulevard connecting Malibu Drive. 10/27/94 Karen Krinskey, 6423 Willow Wood Road. Wants Interlachen Boulevard connected to Malibu Drive. Does. not want the. traffic directed down Willow Wood Road from Kelsey. Share traffic burden. 10/28/94 Mary Kroon, 6416 Willow Wood Road. In favor of the approved extension of Interlachen Boulevard, want it extended. Thought it was a done deal! 10/28/94 Mrs. Swanstrom, 6412 Willow Wood Road. Interlachen Boulevard was designed and approved to be extended to Malibu Drive. Want it extended to share the flow of traffic evenly. 10/31/94 Dee Wentworth, 5217 Malibu Drive. Favors connecting Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. Entire neighborhood will function much better. The connection was part of the original Comprehensive Plan that she was aware of when she purchased her home. (Remember residents on Interlachen Boulevard knew that too). 10/31/94 Robert Howard, 6421 Willow Wood Road. In favor of extending Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. 10/31/94 Mrs. James Callan, 5234 Green Farms Road. Interlachen Boulevard should be extended as originally approved to Malibu Drive. 10/31/94 Liz Hollway, 6644 Parkwood Road. Supports the connection of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. 11/1/94 Doug Jordahl, 5109 Green Farms Road. Want Interlachen Boulevard extended as originally approved. The way it was originally proposed is the most logical way. 11/1/94 Karen Benson, 6413 Willow Wood Road. Wants Interlachen Boulevard extended as approved. 11/1/94 Don Herzog, 6409 Willow Wood Road. Wants Interlachen Boulevard extended as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan. 11/2/94 Lloyd Pearson, 6511 Willow Wood Road. Favors connection of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive as in Comprehensive Plan. Participated in original Parkwood Knolls traffic study. 11/7/94 Mary and Mike Johnson, 6501 Willow Wood Road. Favors connection of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive was indicated in the Comprehensive Plan. 11/8/94 Nanthan Nelson, 5231 Green Farms Road. In favor of extending Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. 11/8/94 Elizabeth and Marcus Gustafson, 5725 Camelback drive. Concerned with density and traffic if Interlachen Boulevard is not extended as originally approved. 11/8/94 Mary Gozen; 6616 Parkwood Road. Wants Interlachen Boulevard extended to Malibu Drive as proposed. 11/10/94 Martha and Jeffrey Anderson, 6205 Parkwood Road. Want Interlachen Boulevard extended as approved . Disappointed with the city fore re- visiting the Comprehensive Plan. We knew it would go through when we purchased our house. The new " Parkwood Knolls" coalition has dominated this issue thus far. They do not represent everyone. This coalition has been given six months, and all the city information to get. their agenda heard. Resent that we haven't been heard. A majority of us were not even notified because we did not speak up. Everyone should share the traffic burden. 11/10/94 Nancy Stenson, 6216 Parkwood Road. Supports the city in extending Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. Attended last evenings meeting and questioned why the "Interlachen Group" was there. By listening it was evident that Hoisington had meet with this group before .alone! When do we get to be heard alone! Everyone understands traffic will be increased but it should be shared evenly!!!! COMMENTS RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS WERE DELIVERED 11/18 Mrs. Rhoda Vannagenen, 6200 South Knoll Drive - wants Interlachen connected. 11/29 D.H. Wentworth, 52.17 Malibu Drive wants Interlachen connected to Malibu Drive as planned. October 28, 1994 Mr. Craig Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson, I live at 6517 Willow Wood Road in Parkwood Knolls. My home also is bordered on the side by Kelsey Terrace where it deadends into the property proposed development by Harvey Hanson. In 1988, my husband and I looked at a piece of property owned by Mr. Kenneth Durr on the cul -de -sac near the Fink home just off of and facing Interlachen Boulevard. We had Mr. Durr begin to consider plans for a home and abandoned our interest in the lot as soon as we learned that there was a plan in place d with the not wish City l ve on to connect Interlachen through to highway 169. We simply a collector level street. With this in mind, we chose to build the home at 6517 Willow Wood. I believe that the homeowners now living on Interlachen Boulevard bought their homes with full knowledge, or full accessiblility to knowledge that Interlachen would one day be connected to highway 169. 1 am not, a real estate agent, but I think it is common knowledge that a home on a collector street would have less value than the same home on a quiet residential street. I would like to have the following questions answered: 1) Why would the City Council feel justified in improving the home values and neighborhood aesthetics for a small group of homeowners who: a) bought there knowing that the highway would eventually come b) got a "discount" on the purchase price of their homes because of it to begin with, and c) are unhappy now that it is coming to pass and they want to have their cake and eat it too? 2) Why would the City Council feel justified in satisfying the noisiest group by damaging the quiet ones who have been trusting the council to be good for it's word, as given in the 1977 -78 Comprehensive Plan which was the basis for all the surrounding area residents' for selection of property and influential in determining the value of that property. In other words, we paid a premium to live away from Interlachen and now you are going to change the plan, devaluing our home, hurting our resaleability, and destroying the quietness of the neighborhood we have paid such high taxes to live in. (...raise the value and aesthetics of the lesser valued property by destroying the value of the property that cost more to begin with ? ? ? ?) I have trusted the Edina City Council to stick to its plans as stated and I am dismayea that it has even come to the point where I need to write this letter. A home is usually (certainly in our case) a person's most valuable financial asset and to have that threatened is not something one expects -rta in Edina. I am sorry that the folks on Interlachen are upset with progress going forward as planned. but I do not feel it is right or just for our home to be unnecessaniy devalued in order to quell their regrets for living on the planned highway connection. I expect to share neighborhood new homes in the he a ea would be would look ook forward generated with the building to seeing the area completed. Mr. Hanson would be wise, to maximize the desireablility of his own new development-by finding a way for the new homes to access the highway as far to the north as possible. I would consider it responsible if Mr. Hanson were to design Interlachen to curve enough to discourage "drivethroughs" when the connection t4 Malibu is made. It is my express hope that the Edina o Malibu as planned so many years ago City Council its commitments of 1977 -78 and connect Interlachen t Very truly yours Dawn Kemson 6517 Willow Wood Road Parkwood Knolls THE UNDERSIGNED ON DATED OCTOBER ANDRAGREE TO ER CR AIG LAR HE CRAIG POINTS MADE WITHIN: Name (Print) TvM Lc F Address Sigr �A Qt' Zc'yW'L1��t.t L \41 L� ��q d � /Cly � /L,tif,7CA V� � 5710 3fll��� E ce, &.v ' �z- �� f ^�ie12�Wr�c� �� t�►n� — sS`f�6 U Attachment to Dawn Kerrison Letter WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE READ DAWN KERRISON'S LETTER, TO CRAIG LARSON. DATED OCTOBER 28. 1994 AND AGREE TO ALL THE POINTS MADE- WITHIN: Name(Print) Address Signature /Date T14 14 1 XC'111' 1 w t /° 7ze, iq apogee Gerald K. Anderson President enterprises. inc. 4 O � '5 7'0 VL CYLAt L A-It -so� 5wcec- 117�5 (Z"iA-#,j HU" 19�z>-80 NO U, I q T— ,L -n ti coin >� t���s �v� 1�c-�v w�t� Ipc>✓icc�- s�io i �. I�►2o dYL -7- W A-U o h��� ➢b IiU�C 7'ti I ✓� Cc�NCtivt,rV S wtfei� TfK 9LN� W6 T34. ► Ryl Vet U 1L, ATi. 0 +LJ!v t 77ffL P LAi� T1t �ti0 -�U�125�c /l�I r4GT Dl24 hfsi,dfAVTs !ti �?VfK y � A41� 4 S o F twf{o ,%i 1�71 D I vA ` uv1c 1�95�w4 ��4n. /5 Gt�/ZUllJfv liyVD e. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South • Suite 1944 • Min;A-O� Minnesota 55431 -1159 • (612) 835 -1874 � o � LU l L. 0 w %' ".no � cl, -4�Lc- CL CL 4, A November 16. 1994 Mr. Crain Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Craig, As a member of the Edina Optimist Club, we want to thank you for your thorough presentation on October 25th entitled "Development of the Edina Mystique since the 1950's ". The purpose of this letter is to ask that you insure all avenues will be reviewed thoroughly with respect to the final decisions to be made on the proposed Harvey Hansen development of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. We are all very concerned about the increase in traffic which will be generated with the proposed 91 new residences in this addition. You will note from our address the concern we have on Telemark Trail if Interlachen Boulevard is not extended, or other roads are not constructed to carry the Northwest Edina traffic to and from Highway 169. When Malibu was recently opened to Highway 169, traffic obviously increased on Telemark Trail. As Telemark Trail is a relatively short street, the six houses with garage entrances on Telemark currently experience, to some degree, driveway conflict. We feel the increase in traffic from Mr. Hansen's new addition could be a definite safety hazard on Telemark - just waiting for an accident to happen, .particularly during adverse driving conditions. With the opening of Malibu to Highway 169, we have experienced several "close calls" when entering our driveway. We recognize it is difficult to work out a satisfactory solution for all residents bordering this new area of development. Parkwood, Telemark and Malibu cannot take major additional traffic flow without creating safety and other logistical problems. Thank you for your consideration during evaluation and decision making processes. ILI David and Marion B. Williams 6801 Telemark Trail Edina, MN 55436 'Aovember 15, 1994 Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: As residents of Parkwood Knolls, we are very concernced about the traffic and safety of our neighborhood. Since we moved into our home on View Lane two years ago, we have been alarmed at the volume of traffic on our street, as well as the speed of the vehicles. The safety of our school age children and others in the neighborhood is in jeopardy because of this problem. Additional traffic onto View Lane would only increase the problem. As residents, we would like to voice our strong approval and support of the City of Edina in it's preliminary approval of the proposed Hansen development which opens Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu. We are opposed to the Coalition's counter proposal which closes Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu, thus directing all traffic through the south end of Parkwood Knolls. This would impact our lives and the safety of our children greatly. Our street and neighborhood need to remain safe; please help us keep them that way. -: m Katherine rumstrup a0d 5717 Vi4dW Lane Edina, Minnesota 55436 cc: Fred Richards Peggy Kelly Jack Rice Glenn Smith Jane Paulus � Michael Bing r . t CLIFFORD L.OLSON 5804 Schaefer Road • Edina, Minnesota 55436 • 612 - 936 -9943 November 16, 1994 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: I have just learned of a proposed change of dropping the extension of Interlachen Blvd. m Malibu which was planned in connection with the 91 homes that will be gang in Parkwood Knolls 24. 1 favor the original plan approved by the City in 1977 that provides for this extension. If this extension is not put in, additional traffic will be forced onto Schaefer Road which is already quite heavy for a side street. Sincerely, CliffoYL so n November 16, 1994 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: We are writing to you in regard to the Harvey Hansen development of 91 homes going in Parkwood Knolls 24 behind Green Farms to Malibu. We would like to go on record supporting the original city plan from 1977 providing for two entry/exits. The north/south entry/exit is the extension of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu; the east/west entry/exit for this development is at Willow Wood and Kelsey Terrace. Having lived in the Parkwood Knolls area since 1983, we are interested in maintaining the integrity of the neighborhood and are very much opposed to the counter proposal to close Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu. Clearly, the traffic through the south end of Parkwood Knolls would increase to levels that will adversely effect our neighborhood. The 1977 Overall City Plan outlines a prudent approach to the development of this new subdivision taking into consideration the interests of all homeowners in the area, not a select few. We ask that you give full consideration to our stance on this issue. We also ask that you support our desire to spread the traffic from the new development equally throughout Parkwood Knolls. Sincerely, 4��qt /42�'Z-11-1 Gene Kujava 6605 Parkwood Road Edina, MN 55436 936 -0082 733 -2700 (W) cc. Fred Richards Peggy Kelly Jack Rice Glenn Smith Jane Paulus .Sties Susan Kujava 6605 Parkwood Rd. Edina, MN 55436 936 -0082 481 -2331 (W) 11/09/1994 14:39 6129336558 STEVE DONDLINGER PAGE 02 November 9, 1994 Mr.Craig Larsen Edina City Hall Dear Mr. Larsen; Undoubtedly the issue of the access to interlachen has been stressful for you. The end results of this issue will probably not affect me as much as others, therefore, I feel my opinion is more unbiased. I feel that those who want to block the access are a very vocal minority. Many 2cople 9gned their petition (I almost did myself until I read it and asked more questions.) under th ty were peti ionkg high ensity ho�us g only. They even had the petition outside a planning 1-�rrmission meeting giving the impression you were signing an attendance list. I've known about the interlachen access since before I moved here in '87. When Malabu opened I worried about more traffic cutting through the area but I did not oppose the opening because I felt the future Interlachen access would provide a fair balance. Please do not allow pressure from a vocal minority to affect your decisions. The Interlachen access can be done in such a fashion as to not encourage more traffic from other areas. Pm sorry 1 cannot attend to tonights meeting but I plan to attend future meetings and to keep in touch. 5513 Knoll Dr. 938 -0213 November 15, 1994 Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 We live at the corner of Stauder and Schaefer, namely 5601 Schaefer Road. We have enjoyed the location and the neighborhood, with one possible exception, the amount of traffic which passes our home. While we have a three way stop, cars rarely stop, particularly those which are from outside our immediate neighborhood. Since we have three young active children, we are constantly concerned about our children running out in the street and being hit by an automobile. Playing in the street is simply not an option due to the existing high traffic level. Now we understand there is a group which seeks to change the City Plan for the Park-wood Knolls 24 Development. The plan was well thought out and provided for a number of entry/exits. This group of residents would like to close off one of the only entry/exits, the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. The extension of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu is a very logical entry point to the new development from the North and is consistent with the desire to spread the new development traffic throughout Parkwood Knolls. The people in the adjacent neighborhoods already speed by our home. The extension of Interlachen to Malibu may not totally deal with our existing or future problems, but it might alleviate some of the potential traffic coming by our home and provide a more equitable sharing of the traffic. The group of residents, The Interlachen/Parkwood Coalition, do not want to share in the traffic generated by the new development. They should have opposed the development and the plan initially, rather than after the fact seeking to place the burden of much of the traffic on residents who already share a significant burden of traffic to that neighborhood. It is unfair and inequitable, and we oppose the change in the city plan offered by this group and will do all within our power to oppose this by whatever political or legal means we have at our disposal. Sincerely, �:.�de� ce and Joe r cc: Mayor Fred Richards All Council Members October 27, 1994 Mr. Craig Larson - City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson: We write this letter as 40 year (Nancy) residents of Parkwood Knolls and as. builders of two Carl Hansen Homes (1979 and 1988). In 1979 when we built our home on Willow Wood Road. we had done our homework and knew that Interlachen Boulevard would eventually be opened up when Carl Hansen opened up the acres "behind" us.' Again, in 1988, we confirmed with Carl and Harvey Hansen that the same plan was still active. We have always thought that the opening of Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive was a plus for this neighborhood. We are puzzled and frustrated by our neighbors who seem to have just learned of this plan and oppose it. Those who purchased their homes on Interlachen Boulevard were apparently ignorant of the City's well thought out Comprehensive Plan and now want to change the integrity of our neighborhood by redirecting the traffic flow. We chose our location in the neighborhood knowing that Interlachen Boulevard would be a connecting street carrying an above average amount of traffic and that Green Farms would not be a connecting street per se. We feel badly that some did not do their homework. However, we do not think that the 1977 -78 Comprehensive Plan approved by the City of Edina should change. A small group of nay- sayers has been more vocal than those of us who support the plan as previously passed. We wish to have our thoughts known as well. We support the City's Comprehensive Plan developed in 1977 -78 which calls for Interlachen Boulevard to be a collector street connecting with Malibu Drive. Thank you for your consideration. Mr. Craia Larson October 27, 1994 Page 2 Sincerely, � CK) �- T� kA t4-zr W ot) Ken and Nancy Woodrow 5112 Green Farms Road Edina, MN 55436 935 -7593 _.� Callan Publishing, Incorporated 6465 Wavzata Boulevard • 1Iinneupolis. NIN 55436 • 613!541 -9000 November 4, 1994 Mr. Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 7300 Metro Blvd., Suite 525 Edina, MN 55439 Dear Sir: I have a letter from Harvey Hansen indicating that the City of Edina has some second - thoughts about, the city's Comprehensive Plan of 1977 -78 which would make Interlachen Boulevard a collector street connecting Malibu Drive. I am writing this letter to indicate the Callan household at 5234 Green Farms Road is interested in having that happen. Interlachen Boulevard is a traffic street, and to block it off for the sake of a few people who think it might inconvenience them is, in our opinion, not in keeping with the best interests of the city. Mr. Hansen* requested that we let our feelings be known to you, and that is what I am doing here. Sincerely yours, James H. Callan 5234 Green Farms Road Edina, MN 55436 cc: Craig Larson Harvey Hansen DAVID C. PLUMB 6508 WILLOW WOOD ROAD EDINA MIN 55436 November I, 1994 Craig Larson, Cit} Planner Citv of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson. We are writing to express our opinion that the city of Edina should NOT amend the Comprehensive Plan which calls for a connection between Interlachen Boulevard and Malibu Drive. We have taken this position for these reasons: • The Interlachen - Malibu connection would minimize increases in traffic for the majority of residents in the community which adjoins the proposed development. • A vocal and organized subgroup of th- community should not be able to alter what we can only assume has been a carefully consiu.; —: .!:rmi ehensive Plan and, in our view, the most logical and efficient of the alternatives for moving traffic in and out of this new development. • The subgroup of Interlachen residents had notice, or could have had notice, of the planned connection in the 1977 -78 plan. • We purchased our home with the expectation that the development of the 53 acres behind it would adhere to the 1977 -78 Comprehensive Plan and that the tranquillity of this location would remain fundamentally unchanged. Thank you for taking account of our interests. Sincerely. ,C David C. Plumb Mary Guilford Plumb cc: Fred Hoisington WILLIAM C. JOAS 6612 PARKWOOD ROAD EDINA, MN SS436 93S -1081 Mr. Crain Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina. MN 55424 November 4, 1994 Dear Mr. Larson, We are writing this letter to express our concerns regarding the proposed development by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company. We understand that -the Interlachen Boulevard neighborhood filed a petition objecting to Interlachen Boulevard being connected to Malibu Drive and that a study is now in progress. We recently signed a neighborhood letter voicing many of the same concerns. Since the letter did not take into account our exact views we felt it necessary to follow up with this letter. We believe that the traffic increase of up to 1,000 cars per day to be very significant and that Parkwood Road and Malibu Drive can not support this traffic increase. We believe that if this development takes place all the neighborhoods will need to take some of the traffic burden. The proposition put forth by the Interlachen group that Interlachen Boulevard not be connected to Malibu is an outrage and is not acceptable. Parkwood Road can not handle the large increase of traffic. We are not thrilled about this development however, the Interlachen Boulevard area can not be "elitist' on this developments traffic burdens. At the city council meeting that we attended on May 16, 1994 a member of the city council strongly suggested that Mr. Carl Hansen form neighborhood meetings in the order to provide information and a forum over the proposed development. As of today, November 4, 1994 there has not been any such communication by Mr. Hansen. While we do not consider this to be a perse act of bad faith, we do feel it is a direct reflection of the type of attention the developer has provided with respect to this matter. we are beginning io yuC .silO i w 1161itr this dcv !opm-cat - ; 1 Iy +n the bast interest of the residents who live in the area. We strongly encourage a well thought out means for dealing with this problem and we strongly urge clear and effective communication to all the residents in the affected neighborhoods by the city council, the city planner, and the developer in respect to this ongoing process. Sincerely, 'A William and Margaret Joas To: Craig Larson -City Planner City of Edina 4801 W.50th Stree? Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Groin 7300 Metro Blvd. Suite 525 Edina. MN 55439 From: James & Carol Ladner November 1,1994 Subject: Proposed Park-wood Knolls 24th Addition Subdivision and Re- Zoning presented by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company. I am enclosing copies of prior correspondence that reflects our position. The recent correspondence from Parkwood Knolls Construction Co. reveals a conflict with the position Harvey Hansen has on several occasions stated at the planning and council meetings: that is, "I do not care if Interlachen Blvd. extends through to Malibu Drive. It is irrelevant to the development of the land parcel." If Mr.. Hansen does not care, I do not believe that his letter would be worded as it is. The tone of the recent letter infers that the burden will be borne by the residents to the south and east. This appears to be a soliciting of support of those residents to shift the traffic back north to Interlachen Blvd. I again state, I believe that the talented engineers, if given the assignment, can come up with a plan that spreads the internal traffic flow four ways. I am firmly against opening Interlachen Blvd. or any other street to direct access #169 and areas to the west, which will encourage pass through traffic from outside the neighborhood. Presently are times when the intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen Blvd. are clogged up. The area between the lakes just is not sufficient to handle high volumes of traffic. To emphasis our position, do not extend Interlachen Blvd. to Malibu Drive or to #169. I also believe that if the wetlands act reduces the land parcel in question by 10%, then the number of lots should also be reduced by the same amount, rather than increasing the. density, as proposed by Parkwood Knolls Construction Co. ::arol K. Ladner �- iames W. Ladner r To: Members of the Edina City Council From: James & Carol Ladner July 11,1994 Subject: Proposed Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Subdivision and Re- Zoning presented by Parkwood Knolls Construction Company. We have attended the meetings of the Planning Commission and the City Council meeting concerning the 24th Addition Subdivision. The proposal presented has created a great deal of interest among the residents in the area, and rightly so. We have presented our thoughts to the planning commission, both verbally and in written form. (copy enclosed.) The development of the area to date has created a very nice neighborhood of single family homes which is enhancing to the entire City of Edina. The addition of lot line homes and town houses in this area would be a negative to this single family home concept. We are very much opposed to opening Interlachen to the west joining Malibu Drive. The area will be degraded if it is opened to through traffic as there would be a tremendous influx of non - residential traffic seeking ways to avoid a freeway system. As it presently laid out, we already have non - neighborhood traffic passing through. It is imperative that a study be made of the traffic flowing through the Interlachen Boulevard -Blake Road area. It is a bottleneck at this location and could not stand an increase of traffic if the boulevard were to become a through street. Several weeks ago at the stop sign on Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard, I observed 44 cars lined headed North at 5:55 PM. It has been pointed out the West Interlachen is a very narrow street and that presently the grade at Ridge Road is a hazard. You will note in the letter to the Planning Commission, the late Carl Hansen had told us that the plan submitted in the 1978 was his concept at that time, and that the routing showing West Interlachen Boulevard as a through street would be revised. We are aware that with the construction of additional housing in the area, that access needs to be provided. We suggest that the Parkwood Knolls Construction Company engineers can come up with a plan that will divide the access for future residents equally between North, South, East and West. This would split the traffic flow to North 169 access via Malibu Drive, South 169 access via, South and East to Gleason via Parkwood and East on Interlachen to Blake Road and East Interlachen Boulevard to Vernon Ave. We see no rational to provide for those not residing in the area to use local roads through residential areas as an easy access to the freeways. We also have observed that the park land that has been set aside appears to be for the benefit of Edina residents and non -Edina residents that do not reside in the area. Most of the park area is set up in ball fields and enclosed by a fence that restricts area residents access. We also submit that in complying with the Wetlands Provisions, that approximately five acres, (10% of the total aacition,) is restricted. This should allow for 1095 fewer single family homes reducing the proposal to 82 housing sites. The engineers should make provision for this adjustment. Mr. Harvey Hansen has publicly stated that he did not care whether or not Interlachen Boulevard passed through to Malibu Drive, nor was he adamant regarding the town houses. Therefore, we are at a loss as to who is the driving force that desires to include these provisions. We urge you to turn down the provision to convert Interlachen Boulevard as a through street to Malibu Drive and to turn down the rezoning request to allow zero lot line and townhouses. WE support a plan that allows for the development of 82 single family housing units with traffic flow serving those units divided equally North, South, East and West. Sincerely, r Carol K. Ladner James W. Ladner CC; Parkwood Knolls Construction Company jAMES IV. LADNER 4931 GREEN FAWS, ROAD EDINA, MN. 55436 April 23, 1994 MEMBERS OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION I have been a resident of Edina since 1957 and have lived in three homes constructed by the senior Carl Hansen. I was in attendance at the March 30th meeting of the Edina Planning Commission, and would like to comment on several of the points discussed at that meeting. It is obvious that the neighborhood is against the idea of extending. Interlachen Boulevard thru to Malibu Drive. Prior to building my present home, I had a number of meetings with the deceased Carl M. Hansen. He advised me that the idea of extending Interlachen to the west was only a conceptual idea of his, and that prior to re- platting the remaining land that he owned, it was his plan to alter the plat to eliminate a thru route to the west. At the recent planning meeting, we were led to believe that the idea of a thru street was sponsored in the long range development plan by the City. Interlachen Boulevard west of Blake Road is a neighborhood street, not in anyway upgraded as is Interlachen Boulevard between Vernon Avenue and the junction with.Blake Road, ( which is a county road). The street is in no way capable of handling volumes of thru traffic, which would result in the extension to Malibu Drive. It has been my experience for the past,four years, that the much of the present traffic on West Interlachen Boulevard currently travels in speeds in excess of 30 mph. A thru street would be an additional hazard to the children and the many neighborhood walkers. on a recent rriday evening at x:10 PNI :here were 15 cars headed North, backed up on Blake Road at the Interlachen Boulevard stop sign. My observation was that few, if any consisted of local traffic. Rather they were people passing thru from outside the neighborhood with destinations outside the area. We do not approve the plan to connect Interlachen with Malibu Drive. At the meeting, it was described that the 1978 plat allowed for 91 single family lots. The proposed plat requests altering to allow for 96 units, which includes town house units and zero lot line units. This is allocation is to be on about 10% (approximately S acres,) less area because of the wetland regulations. Logic tells me that the development should be restricted to 10% fewer single family building units rather than increasing the density. This would be more consistent with the original plans as envisioned by the senior Mr. Hansen. All developers are faced with meeting the wetland regulations and many are doing so by reducing the density. We do not want a higher density-, nor town houses. The senior Mr. Hansen executed a great addition to the City, and his vision was to create a quality neighborhood without crowding housing units onto every available parcel of land. I would propose that a plan should be developed to funnel the additional automobile traffic serving the neighborhood half to the south and east, and half to the north and west, with no allocation for thru traffic. The plan as presented benefits only the developer, at the expense of the present and future residents of the area. I urge the Edina Planning Commission to deny the plan as proposed, and- to consider the wishes of the neighborhood tax paying Citizens, present and future. Thank you. Sincerely, J' es W. Ladner Interlachen Parkwood Knolls Coalition c/o Betsy Robinson 5021 Ridge Road Edina. MN 55436 August 1, 1994 At the July 16th Edina City Council meeting, I believe that I heard Mayor Fred Richards state that in Edina, volumes of traffic, speeds, etc. were controled best by traffic control, (ie: stop signs and sped signs,) rather than by street layout design. The implication was that the trafflic flow on Interlachen Boulevard would be controlled by stop signs and speed signs. If this be the case, the recent article in the Sun reveals a conflicting position. "The staff group cited a city policy that prohibits the installation of stop signs in an effort to reduce speeds or traffic volume, explaining that stop signs are ineffective for those purposes." This is also interesting in light of the expense and inconvience created in the Country Club area. Can you confirm what I thought I heard Mr. Richards say? James W. Ladner 4931 Green Farms Road Edina, MN 55436 I would to "ieveaue areas,:: such cherni�l5 tt9ed –enlY fn report on the issue by March 31. Signs denied St. John's Motion to install fails on 2 -2 vote By Jeffrey Pieters Staff Writer A citizen's effort to have stop signs installed at two intersec- tions in a central Edina neighborhood failed Monday, July 18. l.isa•Finsness, of Edina, peti- tioned the board to install sets of stop signs at two intersections on St. John's Avenue — one set at Woodland Road and the other at Oak Drive. Council member Peggy Kelly moved to install the signs at the Woodland Road intersection, but the motion failed passage on a 2 -2 vote. F5rlsness and a number of her neighbors told the board that because there are no controls on St. John's Avenue from Golf Terrace to 59th Street, traffic is able to reach to pedestrians ar,eats — many of them children — and to Crass-tmffic at one intersection, Woodland Road, with poor visibility. A report, . submitted by a group of staff members charged to investigate traffic safety city. wide, advised the council that no stop signs .. needed on St. John's Av, a residential street that x . on average, less than 15i; .:::ties per day. Residential :.,: ;:,s, the report said, typically arry. up to I.Ow vehicles per day. The staff gt'otrp cited a city Policy that prohibits the installa- tion of stop signs in an effort to reduce speeds or tra ffic volume, explaining that stop signs are in. effective for those purposes Citing -a two -day traffic survey. the report also said that roughly seven -eighths of the traffic on St.. John's Avenue CEDRICS —THE NAME YOU TRUST IN FASHION wil It OFTHISSEASON'S travelled at 25 miles per hour or Slower, with no cars recorded travelling faster than 35 miles per hour. A search of accident reports in the area over the past three Years revealed one accident in June 1994 at the intersection of St. John's Avenue and Woodland Road. Other recommendations in the staff report — all of them ap- proved by the Council — included: 0 Installation of winding road signs with a 25 miles per hour advisory sign to be posted at the north and south ends of Delaney Boulevard. • Denial of speed control signs on Cornelia Drive. • Denial of a request for in- formational signs in the Beard Court area. 0 Denial of a request for signs on the east curve of Amy Drive. Plan would connect neighborhood street Citizens fear likely traffic increase By Jeffrey Pieters Staff Writer A development plan that would connect Interlachen Boulevard v ,11. Malibu Drive received f. Lary plat ap. proval by ; _ a City Council Monday, I A numi. lizens living in the Pine *„ Knolls develop• ment were at the meeting and complained that the connection would bring increased traffic to their neighborhood. The development is in the nor- thwestern part of Edina, bet. ween Interlachen Country Club and Highway 169. Neighbors fear that the connection will make their street a miniature expressway connecting the two Points, allowing drivers a shorter, quicker route to the highway. The city's strategic guidelines PrOPQ:e to make Interlachen Boulevard a collector street. A 1978 Plan shows Interlachen Boul vird ,onnecting to Malibu Sb t ::in.ilar to the current proposal. :le c:1 'rc longstanding goal h.- bre .:o have as many ac. c points as passible in the area, and the city's Comprehen- sive Land Use Plan, discussed at Monday night's meeting, foretells of the eventual exten. sion of Interlachen Boulevard to Highway 169. The preliminary plat approv- ed by the Council is the second submission of the development plan by Harvey Hansen, owner of the property. David P. White 5211 Green Farms Court Edina, Minnesota 55436 November 2, 1994 Mr. Craig Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson, I would like to express my support for Parkwood Knolls Constructions plan to connect Interlachen Boulevard directly to Malibu Drive. I believe the Interlachen Boulevard extension will provide a safer neighborhood for the residents of the area as well as more efficient traffic flow. I strongly recommend you approve the Parkwood Knolls proposal. S' cerely, o 1 �/j David P. White 5537 Malibu Drive Edina, MN 55436 October 31, 1994 Mr. Craig Larson City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson: As a resident on Malibu Drive south of proposed connection of Interlachen Blvd and Malibu Drive, I am in support of the City's Comprehensive Plan developed in 1977 -78 which calls for Interlachen Blvd to be a collector street connecting with Malibu Drive. Todav, Interlachen Blvd is already being used as a primary thoroughfare in Northwest Edina between Hwy 100 and Hwy 169 (via either Maloney Ave or local neighborhood streets south of Interlachen Blvd). The result is increased traffic already at unsafe speeds on our local neighborhood streets south of Interlachen. To not connect Interlachen Blvd to Malibu Drive would continue to force all that traffic on our local neighborhood streets endangering local residents. Thank you For allowing me to comment on this study. Sincerely, VhAJ. Andrychowicz BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564 October 27, 1994 REFER TO FILE: 94 "31 Mr. Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 7300 Metro Boulevard, Suite 525 Edina, MN 55439 RE: Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Dear Mr. Hoisington: It is my understanding you have been hired by the City of Edina to review the Comprehensive Plan in northwest Edina as it relates to connecting Interlachen Boulevard to Malibu Drive. Enclosed is a copy of our traffic study for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition and Interlachen Boulevard, which the Benshoof firm prepared for Parkwood Knolls Construction in response to a request by the City of Edina. The traffic study supports the City's earlier determination, as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, that connecting Interlachen Boulevard through the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition development to Malibu Drive is an appropriate solution for routing traffic through the northwest area of the City. Based on our traffic study, we have concluded that Interlachen Boulevard, as a collector roadway, will function adequately and safely. Sincerely, BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. d Jon Micheal Wertjes, E. Enclosure: Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Traffic Study Memorandum to Harvey Hansen, September 14, 1994. cc letter only: Harvey Hansen, Parkwood Knolls Construction Francis Hoffman, City of Edina Craig Larsen, City of Edina November 21, 1994 To: Craig Larsen, Edina City Planner From: Linda Hays Witzel 5700 View Lane Edina, MN 55436 In the past few weeks it has c. . •c my attention that the corner of View Lane and Schaefer Road where I live will very : stave an increase in traffic due to the new development of Parkwood Knolls 24. Attu - -atching a traffic counter by my house and then getting late information that indeed our neighborhood would be affected, I decided to attend the meetings. I had been aware of the increasing traffic over the past nine years, but to realize that 1570 cars pass our corner daily was a dreadful shock. To say that this number will increase to over 1900, whether or not Interlachen Road is opened to Malibu, is simply not acceptable. It is urgent that the City Council recognize the continuing traffic problems of this fine neighborhood. Measures must be taken to correct the current build up of traffic at View and Schaefer. The city also must make sure that the future development is ,arefully planned so that we need not be burdened with continually increasing traffic. Thank you for your time. cc: Fred Richards Ken Rosland Peggy Kelly Jack Rice Glenn Smith Jane Paulus (Z)nj aG, I qc� q -1� tL �J % Lr, C�- Willb-4-j- LA� AL,Lk-� I4b NEW qD- t-L Ct-4 4o_u� I j -�Q� .� w-j,-x-L- 11 qLl� (-.64LS-X-� (00� &+ ti:ro yI r Ir l - - i 1 flinutes Interlachen Road Neighborhood Meeting Date: October 26,1994 at 7:00 PM Present: Denny Eilers (SRF) Jeff Bednar (SRF) Fred Hoisington (HKG) Residents: Chuck and Nancy Webster 6645 Interlachen Blvd. Lisa Fish 5408 Larada Lane Edward W. Glickman 5217 Schaefer Road Ted Pier and Betsy Robinson 5021 Ridge Road Ken Durr 4830 Westgate Road (Minnetonka) Tom Sietz 6320 Interlachen Blvd. Dale Renner 6321 Interlachen Blvd. Patrick Mantyh 6413 Interlachen Blvd. Fred Hoisington began the meeting by identifying the consulting firms to be involved in the study. He explained that consultants are to take an objective third party view of the issue generated by Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition which calls for the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. He explained that the purpose of the meeting with neighborhood representatives is to identify issues and concerns. He explained that the consultant team will be meeting with Harvey Hanson on Friday, October 28,1994 and that the draft report is intended to be completed by November 11 in anticipation of a November 16 Planning Commission public hearing. It is anticipated that the preliminary plat will be considered by the City Council on December 5,1994. Questions and concerns raised by neighborhood representatives were as follows: • Neighborhood is interested in an equitable distribution of traffic J= the new development. • If Interlachen Road is connected to Malibu Drive, the neighborhood is concerned that it might serve cut - through, or non - neighborhood, traffic. Hoisington Koegier Group Inc. Page 1 • The neighborhood feels lots of changes have occurred since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1978 including additionai development, extension of the Crosstown, development of Opus, etc. • A traffic problem already exists at the intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen Blvd. The neighborhood is concerned that this problem may be exacerbated by the connection of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. • The neighborhood looks at this as a fairness issue and wishes not to bear the brunt of increased traffic, especially traffic that is not neighborhood related. • Harvey Hanson is proposing to put his lowest cost housing on the proposed Interlachen extension. • Can existing Interlachen Road handle the anticipated traffic volume given its present design? • Will the consultant team consider the cost of construction to bring to existing Interlachen Road up to code? • Will sight lines be a problem? • The consultant team should consider the future development of the Hennepin County Garage site. • Will property value impacts be considered? Will the undeveloped Boos, Weiner and the Durr properties be considered? • The neighborhood feels. the proposed Hanson development violates the 1992 ordinance which encourages gradual changes. in lot size. The 1978 preliminary plat proposed larger lots. (We will check.) • Will access to Van Valkenburg Park be considered? • Twenty -five children now reside on Interlachen Road west of Blake Road. • Could Interlachen Road be designated by the.County as a County road? • How would the roadway extension and improvements to existing Interlachen Road be funded? • Would Interlachen Road serve as a short -cut during periods of highway congestion? The Benshoof study was done during a significant rain storm which may have affected traffic volumes. • What are the objectives of the City in wanting to extend Interlachen to Malibu? • The neighborhood is willing to put up with the existing traffic problem at Blake Road and Interlachen Blvd. It was generally agreed that three alternatives would be evaluated by the consultant team as follows: 1. The extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. 2. No connection of Interlachen Blvd. to Malibu Drive. 3. A circuitous or tuned access which diminishes or discourages non - neighborhood traffic but does provide a connection to Malibu. A second meeting with the neighborhood was scheduled for November 10 at 8:00 PM. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 PM. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Page 2 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. m K November 1, 1994 Re: Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Land Use Study Dear Resident: Hoisington Koegler Group has been hired by the City of Edina to do an overall land use /traffic study for Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition to determine whether Interlachen Road should be extended to Malibu Drive as a neighborhood collector street. The proposer of the new subdivision is Harvey Hansen who has communicated with many of you in writing. Because we have received many comments, it seems appropriate to communicate the study's status. This week we will be counting existing traffic entering and leaving the area surrounding Parkwood Knolls 24th. Traffic counters will be installed on Tuesday (Nov. 1) and counting will continue for one week. We will add the traffic generated by Parkwood Knolls 24th, and other infill developments, to the existing street network to determine how traffic patterns may be altered in the surrounding neighborhood with and without the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. The study has a relatively short timeline in that virtually all of our analysis must be completed by November 18. This matter is tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission Meeting of November 30 and the City Council Meeting of December 5, 1994. These will both be public hearings providing the public with opportunities to comment on the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. The results of our study will be presented at these two public meetings. Obviously, the City is concerned about the impact of each of these alternatives on the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood in general. It wants to be certain that all areas of the neighborhood are considered before an alternative is selected. For this reason we are scheduling a meeting for surrounding neighbors on November 9 at 7:00 p.m. at City. Hall to present the status of the study and listen to concerns. Please come if you can. If you have questions or concerns but cannot attend, please feel free to call me or Craig Larsen at City Hall (927- 8861). You may also submit your comments in writing. Perhaps the best time for written comments will be after November 30 but before the December 5 City Council public hearing. Sincerely, Fr Hoisington, AI Planning Consultant Land Use / Environmental ■ Planning i Design 7300 Metro Boulevard i Suite 525 a Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 6 (612) 835 -9960 0 Fax: (612) 835 -3160 Ilk ,"P>. k .'fi t, IfV%.RA* t t-4 -Q4- fA G, cW4 Vi/ 1. 1W, Lwi ssb I ?3 ; X114 o 2397 X35 -oz cS i?o z�S� 5tiC% Lo-c,-� -�gso G�esf� f ?d, ot�— q�7s�.ij ,?53 - 7- R 7777 �53rs q -7 i 3 51 `x . 0-/7 7 w -r-��- 5y67� �37 - Gaze 531- o �) c/ 7L fro/ 7— 71, y3 /— 9sw J caul "ol l PARKWOOD KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES 11 -9 -94 Approximately 50 residents attended the neighborhood meeting (list attached). Consultants present included Fred Hoisington of HKG and Dennis Eilers of SRF. Fred Hoisington opened the meeting by explaining that this is a public information meeting to inform residents of Parkwood Knolls about the current land use /traffic study being conducted at the request of the City Council by HKG and SRF. He explained that the objective of the study is to take an objective third -party view of traffic conditions within the neighborhood, both with and without the connection of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. He further indicated that the purpose of the meeting is to-have Parkwood Knolls residents air issues, concerns, suggestions and discuss factors that may be considered in deciding on an alternative. Fred Hoisington defined the neighborhood as extending from Blake Road on the east to Highway 169 on the west and from Waterman on the north to the Nine Mile Creek on the south. He identified the alternatives to be evaluated, one with the extension of Interlachen Road, the other without. He also described Harvey Hansen's proposal for the platting of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition and then turned the meeting over to Denny Eilers of SRF to present the existing traffic volumes within the neighborhood. Betsy Robinson, a resident of Ridge Road and representing the Interlachen Road residents, explained the Interlachen Road resident's concerns, especially if existing Interlachen needs to be widened to accommodate more traffic. Another comment was issued indicating that Walnut Drive was originally intended to be extended across the Nine Mile Creek. In lieu of that happening, Carl Hansen promised the Western Edina Task Force that Interlachen would be extended to Highway 169. This tradeoff may be noted in the Task Force's minutes or those of the City Council or Planning Commission. A concern was expressed over mailing lists deficiencies and Fred Hoisington responded by indicating that the mailing list will be expanded. Another concern was expressed that Minnetonka residents would cut through the Interlachen Road neighborhood if the extension is made to Malibu Drive. Several residents expressed support for the extension of Interlachen feeling that their streets are carrying more traffic than necessary attributable to the existing access deficiencies. A strong opinion was expressed that the problem is much greater than whether Interlachen Road is extended or not; that the larger issue should be addressed as part of the study. Fred Hoisington explained the tight timeline to respond to Harvey Hansen's final plat application but indicated that the minutes would reflect a concern that the larger picture issue of too much -traffic through the neighborhood be addressed by the City. A suggestion was made that all external or through trips be precluded from coming into the neighborhood. Another indicated that the property should be split into east and west: halves to preclude through traffic. Carl Hansen responded that his father Harvey Hansen would be willing to consider that option. There was a considerable expression of concern over the speed of traffic on Schaeffer Road and other neighborhood streets and the need for additional traffic control measures to control speeders. There was also a concern expressed that the City's police department does not supply adequate surveillance in the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. Fred Hoisington responded by indicating that no City-has sufficient personnel any longer to provide such surveillance. A comment was expressed regarding the length of Kelsey Terrace which may encourage speeding. A question was asked whether State Aid Funds are available for use to improve Interlachen Road or other neighborhood streets? Denny Eilers explained that Interlachen is not on the Municipal State Aid Street System nor are other neighborhood streets. A suggestion was made that note should be taken of how any new street improvements would be funded and Denny Eilers responded that the developer would be responsible for all streets within the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition and that the only area yet undefined would be that stretch of Interlachen Road from Blake Road west to the new subdivision. Because there was considerable speculation about the impact of the new subdivision on neighborhood street traffic, Denny Eilers explained that an alternative may be tested which would address the larger issue of traffic in the neighborhood. A suggestion was made that SRF test a cut in Kelsey Terrace and Denny indicated that that may be one option that will be considered but that numerous alternatives cannot be studied given the limitations of our agreement with the City of Edina. A question was asked as to whether specific traffic destinations are considered such as restaurants and Denny Eilers responded that generally the transportation model takes those factors into consideration but that the work trip is the easiest to model because of its predictability. Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood Meeting Minutes - 11 -9 -94 Page 2 A strong concern was expressed regarding "the enormous amount of traffic" attributable to the recent connection of Malibu with Parkwood Road. Substantial traffic is alleged to be attributable to that connection and the neighborhood wishes not to see that problem further exacerbated. Generally, there was concern that any increase in traffic would devalue homes. Fred Hoisington explained the schedule indicating that the study is intended to be completed by November 23rd in anticipation of a November 30 Planning Commission Public Hearing on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment if such amendment should be necessary. The final plat is scheduled for the December 5, 1994 City Council Agenda and the Council will make the ultimate decision. Fred Hoisington presented a list of criteria (attached) that may be considered in evaluating alternatives for the extension of Interlachen Road. He asked for comments, changes and suggestions and received two additional criteria one being consensus - the preference that a consensus be reached and house value, the preference being that home values not be adversely effected. The subject of a second neighborhood meeting was discussed and it was agreed that such meeting should be held on November 16th preferably in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. Whether or not this meeting should include all areas of the neighborhood or be divided into two subareas was discussed. It was agreed that all should meet at one time if there is any hope for a consensus to be reached. Fred Hoisington indicated that residents would be notified in writing of the November 16 meeting. Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood Meeting Minutes - 11 -9 -94 Page 3 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. V K November 11, 1994 Re: Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition Land Use Study Dear Resident: Just a note to let you know that there will be a second Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood"meeting to be held at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on November 16, 1994 in the Council Chambers. The purpose of this meeting will be to look at the traffic forecasts both with and without the extension of Interlachen Road to Malibu Drive. Since representatives of the Interlachen Road and the surrounding Parkwood Knolls neighborhood were present at the November 9 session, it was agreed that all should meet at the same time rather than break the neighborhood into separate groups. It was felt that a consensus was more likely to be found if the discussion involved the entire neighborhood. I truly appreciate the cooperation we have received in setting meeting dates and generating attendance. It has and will continue to be most helpful to us in framing the issues and understanding the concerns that must be addressed while seeking a solution. If you have questions or concerns prior to the November 16 meeting, please give me a call. Sincerely, i Fre Hoisington, Planning Consultant Land Use/ Environmental 0 Planning/Design 7300 Metro Boulevard /Suite 525 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ■ (612) 835 -9960 N Fax: (6! 2) 835 -3160 � I -ito-44 y. .q 30 --------- -.. - -- - �ilA�l►�',� --- __f.� /f� >rvT��- �R`���- -,Bcrd _- __ %�3`�'__1r6�0•� R.P A L sba 9e - -- n 11 404CL - U405 hOAkwo a:j �uod n i TAe ne. C04 - (0517- PAt1 woac[- col _- - - -- 9 3 3 - 3 o! weJ - -- eft,,l Sl!-�G ree�0.dw�s -- - - - - -� -OZo� Z zo 60d low CJvod l -- - -- 9% -- -3 -_(�Taoy 'itA SUN KF- -- _.5520_. �90LL-DZ s�enson CQ-1 �_PQ.r,�cc 66th &If 4 Pkaw 9 31 - S sz 0� 1-7 - f G • l GZ'� 6C '7""�G1M�3 �v � l / �Li � � f..: n c' c` �Ll - - -- � � ® - - -`/-- ��,, rC�- LVVoco 37 L. 1 PARKWOOD KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES 11 -16-94 Approximately 50 residents of the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood attended the neighborhood meeting (list attached). Consultants present included Fred Hoisington of HKG and Dennis Eilers and Jeff Bednar of SRF. Fred Hoisington opened the meeting by giving the purpose of the planning process, a definition of the neighborhood, alternatives being considered and the status of the fiinal plat - approval -for Parkwood- Knolls 24tl Addition: -- He then twined -the meeting over to Denny Eilers of SRF to present the first runs of traffic forecasts for the two alternatives one with Interlachen Road connected to Malibu Drive and the other absent that connection. The following comments were registered by residents in attendance: • Are the traffic forecasts accurate? Denny Eilers indicated that they are accurate to within a tolerance of 10 -15 %. • Are recreation trips to /from VanValkenburg Park included, in the forecasts? Denny Eilers explained that they are not. • Is it realistic to think that all through traffic will use Interlachen Road if the connection is made? • Concern was expressed for the large volume increases on Interlachen as forecasted for both alternatives. • A question was asked whether the model calculated the effect of traffic on Blake Road particularly at its intersection with Interlachen Boulevard? • Why do we need easy access for 91 homes? • Would Harvey Hansen be willing to split his subdivision east and west to better distribute traffic? If was generally agreed that this. would not provide a solution since the volume of traffic would not be diminished but would simply redistribute within the neighborhood. • Consideration should be given to those who live on Malibu Drive. Traffic has increased tremendously due to the connection of Malibu to 169. Interlachen could solve part of that problem. • One resident expressed concern for safety. • Would the proposed or suggested realignment of Malibu at the 169 interchange (Option 3) apply to one or both of the alternatives being considered? Denny Eilers explained that it would apply to both. • A concern for speed was expressed with an admonishment to residents that they are responsible. • Truck drivers to /from SuperValu use Malibu Drive. Concern was expressed that the quality of traffic should be considered as well as quantity. • A suggestion was made that the forecasts be made for ten years hence with anticipated growth in traffic particularly since 169 may reach capacity and cause overflow traffic to use neighborhood streets. Denny Eilers explained that I-494 is the more likely improvement to correct overload traffic on Highway 169. • A question was asked about dividing the neighborhood into quadrants and what that might mean? Denny Eilers explained that this would require that Edina residents virtually leave the community before they can return to Edina destinations. • A question was asked about the relative widths of Interlachen and Schaefer Roads? Tom Seitz indicated that Interlachen is 28 feet wide and Schaefer 40 feet wide including the roll curb and sidewalk. • A final question was asked regarding the process and where it goes from here. Fred Hoisington explained that the next meeting will be at the Planning Commission on November 30, 1994. That meeting will deal with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment., • Another question was asked about whether a specific plan would be prepared for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council? Fred Hoisington indicated that the process does not include the redesign of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. The issue is whether or not Interlachen should be extended to Malibu Drive and. that is what the Planning Commission and City Council must consider. If the Comprehensive Plan is amended, Harvey Hansen will need to take an appropriate course of action. This may mean the redesign of the subdivision. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood Meeting Minutes -11 -16-94 Page 2 Dear City Hall. pleas do not make 100 Howsis in the woods from ALEX GRAHAM 93 -33322 PARK WOOD ROD PETITION The Undersigned support maintaining the 1977 -1978 Comprehensive Plan stipulating that Interlachen Boulevard be connected to Malibu Drive providing optimal access to residents of the new Harvey Hansen Parkwood Knolls development. # Name (Please Print) Address Phone e rk 3 o I (_c,) --Aj � L 2. 6 e. 6 �2-0 S 35 f- wl Leon -6 UO& 3 y 3 � 4. 5. r 6. o� 7. g3 8. "T 31- 9. lo. / .� L-11 9 12.7 V 13' PE. itFION The Undersigned support maintaining the 1977 -1978 Comprehensive Plan stipulating that Interlachen Boulevard be connected to Malibu Drive providing optimal access to residents of the new Harvey Hansen Parkwood Knolls development. # Name (Please Print) Address Phone j",- - 0 - F, -,, is .� N FAIII lL %e1 MENEM / OR • Won c , MOSPIPff 1 � ® 1 , • I I 1 , 'War, PET _ _ON The Undersigned support maintaining the 1977 -1978 Comprehensive Plan stipulating that Interlachen Boulevard be connected to Malibu Drive providing optimal access to residents of the new Harvey Hansen Parkwood Knolls development. # Name (Please Print) Address Phone 28. (040q Wit ovj WOO& 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. Furlong, Stuart 8z Dasher October 27, 1994 Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 7300 Metro Blvd. Suite #525 Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Hoisington: As a resident of Parkwood Knolls, I am writing to express the feelings of myself and my husband as well, as a number of my neighbors regarding the potential traffic increase as a result of the Hansen development in Parkwood Knolls. We are very concerned about how the traffic will be routed from the new development particularly because of safety concerns for children. About a month ago, my 7 -year old son and his 2 neighbor friends were crossing the street at our driveway which happens to be near a blind curve and were almost hit by a car that was travelling in my opinion much too fast around the bend. The opening of Malibu Drive to 169 has greatly increased the traffic in our neighborhood and has created trememdous safety concerns for all of us. In fact, I no longer feel comfortable letting my son ride his bike to his neighbor friend's house. I also am concerned as my son needs to cross the street every afternoon when he gets off the bus. On several occasions the bus driver has had to honk and wave at cars coming around the bend to get them to stop so that the children may cross the street. More traffic means a greater probability of an accident. In general, we are not opposed to the development itself but feel that the traffic flow should be shared as equitably as possible throughout the neighborhood. Specifically, we see no reason why Interlachen Blvd. should not be extended through to Malibu Drive. The City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan called for this extension and therefore the residents of Interlachen Blvd. should have been aware of the possibility of the extension for almost 20 years. They have enjoyed limited traffic and it is now time for them as well as us to share this new traffic. Of course, we would all prefer to minimize traffic but we cannot expect to be favored on such a matter. Thank you for your attention to our comments. Sincerely, lie and Thom Dasher 6641 Parkwood Road Edina, MN 55436 935 -6836 430 Oak Grove Street Suite 201 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612 - 870 -9744 Fax 612- 870 -9749 F. Gerald Nilles Monica M. Nilles 5104 Green Farms Road Edina, MN 55436 October 26,1994 Dear Mr. Hoisington, We believe Interlachen Boulevard should be connected to Malibu Drive. We think it would be unfair to shift this traffic to south Malibu Drive, Willowwood Lane, and Parkwood Road. It is inconvenient for us now to drive 6 or 8 extra blocks to exit to Highway 169. We moved into our present house in early 1988. At that time, the information that Interlachen Boulevard would be extended was readily available, and we assume it has been at any time since 1978. The routing should not be changed at this late date. However, we sympathize with anyone who has to live on a busy street. Whatever can be done in the design of Interlachen Boulevard, the use of stop signs, etc. to prevent attracting through. traffic should be done. Sincerely, Jeu & Monica Mlles 5104 Green Farms Road Edina, Mn 55436 _.� Callan Publishing, Incorporated 6465 Wayzata Boulevard • Minneapolis. NIN 55426 • 612 /541 -9000 November 4, 1994 Mr. Fred Hoisington Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 7300 Metro Blvd., Suite 525 Edina, MN 55439 Dear Sir: I have a letter from Harvey Hansen indicating that the City of Edina has some second - thoughts about the city's Comprehensive Plan of 1977 -78 which would make Interlachen Boulevard a collector street connecting Malibu Drive. I am writing this letter to indicate the Callan household at 5234 Green Farms Road is interested in having that happen. Interlachen Boulevard is a traffic street, and to block it off for the sake of a few people who think it might inconvenience them is, in our opinion, not in keeping with the best interests of the city. Mr. Hansen requested that we let our feelings be known to you, and that is what I am doing here. Sincerely yours,, James H. Callan 5234 Green Farms Road Edina, MN 55436 cc: Craig Larson Harvey Hansen U PWIM ale— n 4v lTi 5 s,v 3� J Hennepin County Medical Center HCMC Minnesota's Level 1 Trauma Center Department Chairman Medical Director. Blomechanlcs Lab 'RIChara F. Kvle. M.D. Assistant Chairman Director. Hand Trauma .Thomas F. varecka. M.D. Total Joint Replacement & Trauma •Richaro F. Kvle. M.D. Hand & Upper Extremity Trauma Mlcrovascular Surgery •Thomas F, YareCKa. M.D. Foot & Ankle Trauma Spine Trauma Diseases of Lumbar Spine 'Leo J. oeSouza. M.D. Acetabulum & Pelvic Trauma •David C. TCMDieman. M.D. Diseases & Trauma of the Cervical. Thoracic & Lumbar Spine William j. Mane. M.D.. Ph.D. Director. MUSCU109keletal Sepsis Unit Director. Orthopaedic Learning Center •Ramon d. Gusmo. M.D. Director. Musculoskeletal Sepsis Unit 'Dean ISUKdvama. M.D. Director. Slomechanlcs • loan E, 9ecntola. Ph.D Director. Podlatrlc Surgical Residency Elective & Reconstructive Foot Surgery 'Stephen H. Pomess. D.P.M. Orthopaedic Surgery Department November- 8, 1994 Mr. Fred Hoisington, AICP Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 7300 Metro Boulevard, Suite 525 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Hoisington: 701 Park Avenue South Minneapolis. MN 55415 Telephone (612) 347 -2812 Telefax (612) 337 -7163 Thank you for the information contained in your communication of November 1, 1994, relative to the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition. I am a property owner whose rear lot line abuts the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition and I am fully aware of the implications of the development of the area directly behind my home. With that development _taken as a given, I also recognize that there will be an increase in the amount of traffic through our neighborhood and the approaches to our neighborhood even absent a connection between Interlachen Road and Malibu Drive. I accept and realize that with the; cr:;aticn of 90 new dweliinbs diele probably will be somewhere in the range of 180 cars that will be coming and going via the various approaches to the Addition. That I can live with. What I fear, however, is that if Interlachen Road is connected to Malibu Drive there will be an extraordinary increase in traffic of people completely unassociated with the Addition or this neighborhood. I refer to individuals who will find it attractive to move eastward or westward along Interlachen between Vernon Avenue and Route 169. Just before my daughter graduated from the University of Michigan this past spring from the Masters, Program in Urban Planning these matters were being discussed before the Edina Planning Commission and I asked her if she would discuss with the faculty the relationship of accessibility An equal opportunity employer and safety with regard to neighborhoods. The matter was raised with one of her professors and his response was that the inverse relationship between accessibility and safety was "self- evident " - This viewpoint coincides with mine and it is my opinion that the "Tangletown" character of the streets surrounding the Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition provides a significant degree of security from outsiders. Broaching this security by means of connecting Interlachen Road and Malibu Drive would, in my opinion, be a grievous error. Let me also state that providing the access I recommend to the Addition from .four entrances - let us say, for example, northeast, northwest, southeast and southwest without a direct Interlachen Road - Malibu Drive connection. would work to my personal disadvantage as I would then expect more traffic to traverse Green Farms Road rather than using the Interlachen - Malibu connection as the entry-port. I would accept that since these vehicles would be part of the neighborhood and the Addition, and I would expect no undue threat to my safety from them. I cannot say the same for vehicles simply traversing the neighborhood. In addition, Interlachen Road, west of where it is co- terminal with Blake Road by Mirror Lake, would require extensive widening and; if the information I have received is correct, much regrading in order to meet the state standards required of a "collector" road. Thank you for the opportunity of presenting these concerns to you. I look forward to your recommendations anxiously. Yours sinceMly, William L Kane WJK/jwh a s- AGENDA ITEM II.A. Mario & Margaret Bognanno 6620 Parkwood Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 November 30,1994 Fred Richards Mayor of Edina 7225 Fleetwood Drive Edina, MN. 55329 Dear Mr. Richards: I am aware of the Parkwood Knolls Construction Co.'s plan to develop 53 acres in Parkwood Knolls. Like the majority of residents, I am not supportive of this development, but feel that it is inevitable as land in the area becomes more scarce and more expensive. However,I do adamantly support the opening of Interlachen Boulevard to connect with Malibu Drive as an .access to the new development. This is the only logical access to the new development and has been planned for several years as all residents of the area have known. Other planned accesses to 169 have been opened the past few years, our property at 6620 Parkwood Road has suffered the burden of tremendously increased traffic since County Road 18 became Hwy. 169 and the subsequent Londonderry Road access into the Parkwood area was opened. If the Interlachen access from Malibu is blocked by the Interlachen citizens, we will suffer an even greater traffic load in our area. I feel the Interlachen- Malibu connection should be made to distribute traffic more equally in the area, if it is not, it is a tremendous injustice to residents on Parkwood Lane, Parkwood Road and Telemark Trail. Please keep me informed on the development project. Sincerely, ZJ Mario F. Bognanno & Margaret Bognanno 4b. John Pluhar RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land• Lot 9, Block 1, Sioux Trail Fourth Addition WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A• That part of Lot 9, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, which lies northerly of a line drawn between a point on the easterly line of said Lot 9, distant 55.96 feet northwesterly of the southeast corner of said Lot 9 as measured along the easterly line of said Lot 9, and a point on the westerly line of said Lot 9 distant 53.11 feet northwesterly of the southwest corner of said Lot 9 as measured along the westerly line of said Lot 9. PARCEL B• That part of Lot 9, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, which lies southerly of a line drawn between a point on the easterly line of said Lot 9, distant 55.96 feet northwesterly of the southeast corner of said Lot 9 as measured along the easterly line of said Lot 9, and a point on the westerly line of said Lot 9 distant 53.11 feet northwesterly of the southwest corner of said Lot 9 as measured along the westerly line of said Lot 9. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that they conveyance and ownership of the above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved - 1 - and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 and subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as made be provided for by ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 1994. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 5th, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of December, 1994. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk - 2 - LOCATION Agenda MAP item II.D. Consent LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -94 -4 LOCATION 6917 -19 McCauley Trail E:DINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT -es Planning Commission meeting of November 30,1994 LD -94 -4 Lot Division 6917 -19 McCauley Trail,David 0. Hansen Commissioner Workinger moved approval subject to action by Construction Board of Appeals regarding separate utility connections. Byron second, all voted Aye. to EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 30, 1994 LD -94 -4 Lot 9, Block 1, Sioux Trail Fourth Addition 6917 -6919 McCauley Trail. David O. Hansen The subject property is developed with a double dwelling unit building. The requested lot division would allow for separate sale of the two units. The building does not have separate utility services. Recommendation Approval conditioned on waiver from Construction Board of Appeals. f /-5 -5hrtte duUP4 1W arh''Od y 5l.B th I _ ! t ,..• r� �T/V8 °24'/7" /B9.2B— • -. lel. P .J � .7qY•-) z - 3 Cr +- i.9.419ti 1 3 m dirk .dart m E tent. peA:. be /,,,• I � d „ -� Co W 9 ° ♦w -C, - N Z tY N t^j 39 tnnr. R.Y6 64, 1 N m t►' to e N 6911 : O bilu..irew �� 0 O d 10 zz.° 1 la-' .9 -ewu, /, 4W JSe f/I ��PI /! �LY/P1i�.ODd /r :_teYr -1- r,y ... 51.77... 1 7 ---L— N 99° ?4'17' W r 54.1 Proposed Legal Descriptions: Parcel A: Parcel B: That part of Lot 9, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, which Iles northerly of a One That part d Lot 9, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, which We southerly of a Im drawn between a pojrt an the easterly Pro of said Lot 9. dbtat 55.96 feet northwesterly of drawn between a point on the easterly One of sold Lot % distort 56.99 feet northwestailly of an southeast comer of said Lot 9 as measured along the easterly One of said Lot 9. and a the souN>east carrier of sold Lot 9 as measured along the easterly lice of said Lot 9. and a point on the westerly One of said Lot 9 distant 53.11 feet northwesterly of the sotnhweot post on the westerly life of said Lot 9 distant 53.11 feet nordwesitery of the sotltltsrast comer of said Lot 9 as measured along the westerly We of said Lot 9. cornier d said Lot 9 as nmsured along the westerly Ins of said Lot 9. 1 hereby Certify thal Oft in • true artd Correct representation of a savoy of A No. - �5 -e PREPARED FOR DEMARS - GABRIEL tn. boundaries of e1e above described lane and a the location of al tai - a. 8 LAND SURVEYORS, INC. If any, thereon, and at viable encroachments, if any, Irom a on said laird. Book Paps - As svrsyd by me this /9th y of 01i -der 19 R4 31e -19 aoso Harbor Lerr No. DAVID HANSON f+fymweti fw1 55e17 ,�� %���y�'� --• scale Phan: (812) 559-0908 .w. flop No. r.� 1 mss, 4 9tN,�'� o e �, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION M1 IBBB TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III.A. FROM: Francis Hoffman , fj ❑ Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 5 December, 1994 El To Council SUBJECT: Vacation of Utility and Action Q Motion Drainage Easement - Lot 6, Block 9, South Garden ❑ Resolution Estates 3rd Addition ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate the easement as requested except for the westerly five feet, and property owner /builder relocates street per NSP request. Info /Background: The property owner has requested a sideyard utility and drainage easement be vacated for the purposes of constructing a garage addition. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends vacation of the easement excgo for the westerly five feet (back lot line easement as shown as cross - hatching on attached drawing). Also, staff recommends that the street light be moved per NSP request so that the power line will not be over the new garage addition. l ti'.ie kinion. r ,rO1/410 . 00 O O W U Z O O 3 3 i :47 o O G o 0 d Q I r1 T ..ANT fRUN "/1 I '- ^ � I `39 ' E OF OtJNH �� OR � � 5 1,40 � � .. ChA/ly HK F 4 f ,. Denotes powerpole . Denotes powerpole /lightpole Denotes distance per plat of SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES 3RD ADDITION. Denotes distance as measured. 3.5 ROOT HIGH FENCE 0 E E I . F OvNO \RON %% i S001 8 o/ 0 We hereby certify that this is a true and corr, representatiorq of a survey of the boundaries c. the land above described and of the location all buildings, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 27th day of October , 1994 3 jz-�= � Ww jr vg =nCe SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway (35W) By. — %4. Bloomin ton, AIN' 53420 -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- • (s12� ae1 -2455 Edward H. Sunde, R.L.S. Minn. Reg. No. f U ^ It DBP 942590OZOWO A, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES Agenda Item # IV.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1994 I Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION 300 TO ALLOW THE ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER TO DECLARE A DOG TO BE POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS Recommendation: Grant First Reading. Info/Background: 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution x❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The City Council has conducted public hearings concerning potentially dangerous dogs on two occasions during the past year. A finding by the Council that a dog is "potentially dangerous" does not impose any restrictions on the dog or its owner. However, if such a dog thereafter bites or attacks a person or domestic animal, the Council, after conducting a public hearing, could then declare the dog to be a "dangerous dog ". If the dog is found to be "dangerous ", State Law requires that the dog be registered, confined indoors or in a pen. A warning sign must be posted on the premises and the owner must obtain a surety bond or liability insurance coverage. After reviewing the requirements of State Law, and the practices of other cities, we recommend adoption of Ordinance No. 1994 -11. This- ordinance amendment would allow the Animal Control Officer to designate a dog as "potentially dangerous ". In that this designation carries with it no sanctions or penalties, we believe an administrative process, rather than a formal Council hearing, is more appropriate. The ordinance amendment requires Council hearing and action in order to upgrade the designation from "potentially dangerous" to "dangerous ". A copy of the proposed Ordinance No. 1994 -11, as well as the present code language is attached for your reference. A City of Edina Animals 300.19 or possessor of the property. It shall be the duty of each owner of a dog to remove any feces left by such dog and to dispose of such feces in a sanitary manner. It shall also be the duty of each owner of a dog when such dog is off the owner's premises to have in possession a device or equipment for the picking up and removal of dog feces; at a minimum this equipment must include at least two bags. The provisions of this Subsection shall not apply to a guide dog accompanying a blind person or to a dog when used in police or rescue activities by or with the permission of the City. This Subsection shall not be construed, by implication or otherwise, to allow dogs to be where they are otherwise prohibited by this Code. Subd. 3 Picketing. No dog shall be picketed in such a manner as to create a nuisance by reason of odor or unreasonably disturbing the peace and quiet as defined in Subsection 300.16 or which allows it to occupy any area within 20 feet of a property line. Subd. 4 Clean Yard and Enclosure. A dog owner shall regularly clean any yard occupied by the dog, or dog enclosure occupied by the dog, whether now existing or hereafter constructed, and any area in which the dog has been picketed, and shall not permit feces or food scraps to remain for more than 24 hours. Subd. 5 Dangerous Dogs. A. The provisions of M.S. 347 and M.S. 343.20 through M.S. 343.40 are hereby incorporated by reference and adopted as part of this Section. The persons authorized to enforce this Section shall also enforce the provisions of M.S. 347 and M.S. 343.20 through 343.40. A violation of the provisions of M.S. 347 and M.S. 343.20 through 343.40 shall also be a violation of this Section. Incorporation of said Statutes shall not be a release by the City of any powers or authority which it has without such incorporation. B.-No-dozshall be declared a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog under M.S. 347 except by'the Council after a public hearing. Mailed. notice of, such-hearing, shall be given at least ten days prior to the date of .the hearing-to the owner of the dog and to the owners of all property within 250 feet` of. the property where such dog is usually kept. The Council shall make its decision at such hearing or at any continuation thereof. 300.18 Breaking Pound or City Vehicle. No person except an officer duly authorized by law shall break open or aid or assist in, counsel or advise, the breaking open of a pound or City vehicle used in the enforcement of this Section, or take or let out or attempt to take or let out, any animal placed therein. 300.19 Interference with Officer. No person shall (i) take or attempt to take from any officer referred to in Subsection 300.02, any animal seized by the officer in compliance with this Section; or (ii) interfere in any manner with such officer in the discharge of the ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION 300 TO ALLOW THE ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER TO DECLARE A DOG TO BE POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph B of Subd. 5 of Subsection 300.17 of Section 300 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "B. The Animal Control Officer may_ declare -a- dog -to -be a- potentially- dangerous dog - as- defined by M.S. 347.50. A notice declaring a dog to be potentially dangerous shall be served upon the owner of the dog either personally or by certified mail. The Animal Control Officer may require that a potentially dangerous dog be confined or restrained when on the owner's property and restrained and muzzled when off the owner's property." Section 2. Subd. 5 of Subsection 300.17 of Section 300 of the City Code is amended by adding a new paragraph C as follows: "C, No dog shall be declared a dangerous dog under M.S. 347 except by the Council after a public hearing. Mailed notice of such hearing shall be given at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing to the owner of the dog and to the owners of all property within 250 feet of the property where such dog is usually kept. The Council shall make its decision at such hearing or at any continuation thereof." Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. . TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 5 December, 1994 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Bituminous Distributor with Hydrostatic Drive Company 1. Stepp Manufacturing 2. Long Lake Tractor & Equipment 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 52,145.00 2. $ NO BID 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ Reject Bid GENERAL INFORMATION: Staff recommends rejecting bid as the only bid did not reflect the specifications written but an alternative piece of equipment. Also, the bid was higher than it should have been and as such, a re -bid of this equipment is appropriate. / /tom �, �Z� ; -rr- -✓ Public Works - Streets l Signatyr - Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J allin, Finance Director Kenneth RosMand, City Ma TO: AGENDA ITEM- V. C. DATE: necembsr 5, 1994 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor and City Council FROM: David A. Velde VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: City Properties Refuse Collection Bids Compm Bid Amount 1. Aagard Environmental Services 1. $23,771.77 2. Waste Management, Inc. 2. $25,347.85 3. Gallaghers 3. $30,162.16 4. Browning Ferris Industries 4. $30,916.86 5. Quality waste 5. $33,093.85 RECOMMENDED BID: Aagard Environmental Services at $23,771.77 for calender year 1995. GENERAL INFORMATION: The City has contracted with Aagard Environmental Services for refuse collection in the past and found their service to be acceptable. The present contract is with Gallaghers and the contract was awarded at $32,773.70. The lower bid for 1995 probably reflects the reduced tipping fee being imposed by Hennepin County. However, I expect there will be an increased County tax to offset the tipping fee reduction so our overall 1995 cost may be very similar to 1994. ✓`�'Gi!1 1i/k 111 l U (eAL Health Signature Department The Recommended bid is r (within budget) ® (not within budget) Kenneth Rosland, City Mana er J6fin Wallin, Finance Director f REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: TERRY KEHOE DATE: DECEMBER 51 1994 SUBJECT: GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS InfoBackground: Agenda Item # VI.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Response from Golden Valley Microwave Foods to questions raised at the November 21, 1994, Council meeting. Rust Environment and Infrastructure has provided us with their Statement of Qualifications of Air Quality Services. A copy of that statement will be available for your review at the Council meeting. 67 City of Edina ?November 22, 1 "4 Mr. Michael Bley Golden Valley Microwave Foods, Inc. 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 5543`9 Dear Mike, After last nights Edina C.''_tl' Council meeting, the Council is asking for some additional safeguards. They aYe asking that the following issueC be COnsid°_Yed; 1. A list from Rust Environmental of other locations that have had "scrubbers" installed. It is understood they do not exactly meet the same criteria as the one(s) you are looking to use, but we would still like to get this information. 2. Are there any other companies (competitors) that would be using similar products? How have they dealt with the odor problems? The "option" that the City -- *ouncil posed as far as your company closing down operation of that product "if" the scrubber system does not eliminate the offensive odors. ?lease respond, in writing, by Tuesday, November 29, 1994. We would like information by then to allow us time to prepare for the December 5, 1994 council meeting. If you have any questions, please call me at'(612) 927 -6861. 5i rcere�� -� Terrence K. Kehoe B,Ui lC''i ng Department Coordinator City Hall (612) 927 -8861 3801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 December 1, 1994 GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS, INC. 7450 METRO BOULEVARD, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439, TELEPHONE 612 -835- 6900 - 800 -328 -6286 A CONAGRA COMPANY Mr. Terrence K. Kehoe Building Dept. Coordinator City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Terry: RECEIVED DEC -1 M4 CITY OF EDINA BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT I am writing in response to your letter dated November 22, 1994.. In response to your first question regarding Rust Environmental and Infrastructure, enclosed are two statement of qualifications booklets and a list of some of the locations where Rust has installed pollution control equipment. As you noted, the problems being addressed and the technology employed are not identical to those at Golden Valley's Edina facility. Rather, this information is provided to give you a sense of Rust's experience in addressing similar issues.. In response to your second inquiry regarding others using this process, our fat free product is a new one and the process for making it is a new patent pending process developed by Golden Valley. It is not, to our knowledge, being used by any of our competitors. The odor is being generated by an ingredient in one of the flavors. On November 10 representatives from Golden Valley and Rust went to look at the odor control system used by the ingredient manufacturer. The odor control process used by the ingredient manufacturer is a wet scrubbing system. Finally, with respect to the City's proposal that Golden Valley shut down the fat free process if the scrubbing system doesn't solve the odor problem, we reiterate our firm belief that this will not be necessary and that by March 9, 1995, we will have reduced the odor from the fat free process to an undetectable level. However, once the new equipment is installed, operating properly, and, according to objective test data, reducing the odor to an undetectable level, we would not be inclined to shut down the fat free process. If the city council still receives some complaints from area residents about odor, our proposal would be to personally meet with those residents and the-city council, if desired, to discuss the odor and to promptly investigate the source. we are concerned that since we have been identified as I Mr. Terrence K. Kehoe December 1, 1994 Page 2 an odor source by the city and in the local Edina newspaper, any odors in the area will automatically.be attributed to Golden Valley. In addition, there are significant adverse consequences to shutting down the fat free process. The fat free product is a new one'in which Golden Valley has involved significant R &D, resources'. It is beginning to gain acceptance with national retailers. We are having a difficult time keeping up with current demand for the product. Our major customers have told us that they will not stock and promote the new product unless a continuous supply of the product is maintained. If supply of this product is disrupted during the initial phase of market development, the product will be rejected by our major customers and will most likely fail entirely. This would adversely effect both Golden Valley and Edina. Not only would Golden Valley lose an anticipated revenue stream, but employees in the fat free process would probably lose their jobs, resulting in lost income taxes and payroll taxes. Since the November 21, Edina City council meeting, we have reviewed our process and are testing changes that should significantly reduce the amount of the ingredient that is vented to the outside. We have located a vendor and placed an order for the scrubbing equipment. Additionally, the vendor we found has available a portable test unit which is being installed at our Edina facility this week. Next week we will conduct tests of the effectiveness of the equipment. Rather than waiting until March 9, 1995, we will be'able to confirm that the equipment will perform as expected at the December 19 city council meeting. In the unlikely event the results of the tests indicate the scrubbing equipment will not be effective, we would hope to present to the council at the December 19 meeting an alternative pollution control technology that we would work to install in the same March 1995 time frame. Golden.Valley is working diligently to address-the concerns raised by the council and we believe we will have a satisfactory resolution by March 1995. Sincerely ichael Bley Director of Operations MEB /ETT /jag `/ ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE December 1, 1994 Ms. Elisa Thompson Golden Valley -Microwave Foods, Inc. 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 Re: Project List Rust E &I Project No.: 43091.100 Dear Ms. Thompson: RUST Environment & Infrastructure Inc. 3033 Campus Drive, Suite 175 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Tel. (612) 551 -1001 • FAX (612) 551 -2499 RECEIVED i I DEC -11994 CITY OF EDINA BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT Enclosed please find a partial list of Rust E &I industrial ventilation/pollution control projects. The list includes several which deal with odor control and some which deal with wet scrubbers. Client contacts are confidential; however, a local firm and contact person for which we have permission to reference is noted below. This firm was involved with Item No.s 1 & 3 on the attached project list. Mr. Bill Gertz Hitchcock Industries, Inc. 8701 Harriet Avenue South Bloomington, MN 612/887 -7800 If we can be of further help, please call. Since el eD arl . Braun, P.E., CIH Senior Air Quality Engineer Enclosure W A4309I\LETTERMTHOMPSON.KOB Quality through teamwork n 40 I Rtffr,NF ENVIRONMEN & RE Industrial Ventilation Design ITEM INDUSTRY NO. TYPE PROJECT DESCRIPTION REMARKS I Light metals Neighborhood odor control. Quantified odor sources, supervised pilot Ambient odor (one o.u. state standard). Very few complaints from foundry tests on venturi scrubber /packed bed absorber, designed 200,000 cfm neighbors (as close as 600 ft.). Plant on edge of residential area stack dispersion system and bldg. containment ventilation. extending for miles. 2 Chemical Mfg. Control of dust & vapor from herbicide mfg. operation. Bldg. Meets goal of 100 ughn' with margin of safety. modifications, 3 exhaust systems, make -up air system, vacuum cleaning & pneumatic conveying system. Activiated carbon absorber for odor control. 3 Light Metals Core making odor control wet scrubber system Reported success. Foundry 4 Herbicide Container packaging. Odor control with activated carbon. Odor reduction achieved. Manufacturer 5 Wood Products Wood smoke odor control. Wet scrubber /catalytic incineration control. Catalytic incineration evolved as preferred solution. Manufacturer Feasibility study. 6 Wastewater Waste water process. Odor control. Treated activated carbon. Final design completed. Treatment Facility 7 Soft Drink Carbon monoxide/carbon dioxide control. Building partition walls, Less than TLV of 50 ppm. Bottling ventilation, fork truck maintenance, bottling machine hoods. "Sanitary" design. 8 Plastics Mfg. Air pollution control m- phenylenc diamine (turns black on exposure to No applicable standards. moisture, discolors bldgs.). Plastics development lab, mixing, extruders. d l r �' na•,ry ,d:. r, sk #,: .i x t i 4 .n, w•s v4. t,.% f. „ ,, s r 4t .. s na^; ; Y ?. i .. t.l - ...3 ,,. , } #1 , # ! 4 t . '� E �t nr, sn °n ° ,nmr?t ,! iqq f , (!t f f hf l , Y > _..4 al §t, n 4` ua „ rttal # � Kn f r }) {jY4t s � i 4 � newt" t ; r:wYSr,, .,, *n .fYrt „, rnnrali :;nnr a, ,3 S, d_ -,. . d, .. , , t {{, 3 X€ , .f'4i.3,b �{ . # i t t a .i„, ,.,,,4 �fd fYrn.s . °n'< r :.• ,.,s„ w a•i�r;r�Yr- r••YS•rrbrx ^r^ r +Yrsrs• -i ,f p ,�•- ± ••' '+ , t_.. ,,, ,;!, •:. , ...... _ f , 5 { q !1 f#. a. r � s# ,T i , .,3.,:{: , . , ,. °, >-,r.f nntrWrr it i" k4t ,a ,; i,.;t s . - , , . � k4 •E , 4 �r �l j {)tfgS.o., n r } . 4, . k f , n f � nr stf • S i .} ts, r , S • , s r } �t i i1 t � lt f� . � t } t . f �{i jj� t ,,t,,. J t r f .4 k . f. cd.,• k4., , #.R a v ;,+.:�< . 3f_ < q - , a s-4s . rr . }r � • f�k4 E R F i, " J J ' f;¢i i, {�t#t i!,r "�1f i 1. fe t , �,? t} E . � �f, Y • f ��� 4 ! r F tt q 4 j E } - ' : t �t l � . ' i E I � 4 �' � {f }Iprpy t 7 } � t � Ej1 i k tt I{ r I 1 � F 1 tift fd,t.b 4 t 4ils, �jT��jy4 S ; { ti � jS4 d NI l„ �'! ,d # # • � f..d 1,t f E . {E a } ! rik�dt; •: ; } i : t iI 11,,t,; # ;t r k i j�w�j¢t} }, tf � ;'<, • � }## r : f 4sl ! , s � . t 'f 4k;}} �! 3 , S} i/ g (9 1 a { l } } sitr R „, lF . 7S{ $ ft� }mt�� S}7t;jgif' 1r'' £r d,!._ IS#�} 4 d # : d, � l l }iY's �St� � t 1 t„r{F 7! ' it i t 5 . � l$ i ; ' ; ! I S , :} , � 4 ! � i � : ,E 4 t .j ,.�t S ,E f( ,t .s ,� , . ,, , f , vE� . { f f. dr +f1 } . „ � ,^, � , 4 k } • } • # ii 4t�� � � ' Y •kl3 � � { 1 t f R# t E3 E ±''•tt 4 , f ! ,r F X R.,<z�i ki • } 4 ``4 , t f i f, Ef"� 'ir t � k !f� � S r �• �. ;4 f, ds zf '} r `sr t ; ;.i ; 1�. %7' �, ,s (4 •:, i { i. } d i4. F #. �rI #!. ..e r. �f f Ft it ".34,, •.t 4 I S t . � lo. .eeos.,.R.... -f t .... _..._ , ... ,.._ ,. F. ..t�.... ... 1. Ek .., S .. �.; e. ,,... f. Iqq f !. ty d ...... <_e. .. �.. z.:.... .... _... - _ ...., .. _. .. .._. .. �k, �3 e I 4t� ACTIVITY Nov Nov Dec Dec Dec Dec Jnn Jon Jna Jun ,tan Feb Feb Feb Feb Mar Mar Mar s DESCRIPTION 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 06 3 20 27 06 13 20 R } j Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4 Wk 5 Wk 6 Wk 7 Wk 8 Wk 9 Nvk 10 Wk Wk 11 12 Wk 13 Wk 14 Wk 15 Wk 16 %Vk 17 Wit 18 ' Size and Select ' , 3l ii Equipment t' Order Equipment and Delivery Lead Time 1 System Engineering Plant Pre-Preparation k, for Equipment i Installation k f P Equipment Installation tEt R. EF7 3 a,lpp>k Equipment Start-up Mar 9 , Equipment and f f Troubleshooting and erformance p I ¢ Evaluation ; s ' ,. .4 �. 1t�'•' .. .... i ., ..,. t s.,.. ,.. 1 a• ?._'.,,.. � �i.1 � � t! l4 [3. itt�L. }{, di., f ? 71113 d3 ?:;s` }t :: iff f �i �tS193 L'3,...,.,. ?:, „'. -. 3r a,- ,,,.<,, ,,,;,, , ,,,,i. �>': :.':!'. -a.. [ii r. 1;,. "t f °3° "- �1�;f ;3 k, 'SF13 i! #�dR d,a.i. -..s. .:5,... >,.u,, a.. ..,.... ,.,i:.,aau,... - ..u.fx,..,iitaL.,,S„dit,r, ii43,3i1�'i'Y�lti9lll� }� i ,'j�. ENVIRONMENT& §� INFRASTRUCTURE �J,1' Sr 1134tt �4�F } ,kS�4 e ibf: ,:ii 1 �C4, • i �� � ['s M. >s .,6...... ,,ts : ,s #frif I t .l .5, ' d�f t ':{d''� 4 S ,f #� 'f1 sf3 tt> ?.,,:.. .i,l.. i .. r..[ t,. ; #„ Pro ject No. 43091.100 .!.# .L% ,. : ,,,. 4. . Golden Valley Microwave Foods Next Steps ♦ Have Tested Alternate Process to Help Alleviate Odor Problem - Preliminary Results of Trial look Promising - Secondary Testing to Begin the Week of 12/19 ♦ Have Ordered and Installed Trial Unit of Wet Scrubber System - Unit was Installed 12/5/94 - Will Prove out Technology Prior to Installation - Analytical Testing of Trial Unit to be Done Weeks of 12/5 - 12/12. Hope to Have Results Back by 12/19 Will Not Have to Wait Until 3/9 to Make Sure System Works ♦ Have Back Up Plans IF Wet Scrubber Technology, as Specified, Does Not Work - Dual Stack Scrubber Incineration Golden Valley Microwave Foods Progress Since Last Meeting ♦ Ordered Air Scrubbing Unit from Forest Air on 11/26/94 - Meets Timetable Detai I i ♦ Submitted List from Rust Environmental of Other Locations that have had Scrubbers Installed - List of References Included ♦ Investigated Odor Control Process Used at Supplier of Ingredient - Uses Wet Scrubbing Technology 11 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MANAGER ROSLAND FROM: RALPH JOHNSON, ASSESSOR DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1994 SUBJECT: HEARING DATE FOR 1995 BOARD OF REVIEW Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.B Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends[] To HRA x❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date of Monday, April 10, 1995, for 1995 Board of Review. Info/Background: Pursuant to M.S. 274.01, the City Council acts as the local Board of Review and must meet between April 1 and May 31 of each year. The function of the Board of Review is to review the valuation, classification and assessment of all taxable property in the City. The Board must complete its work within 20 days after convening the hearing. In A. � 9t�11,�'l1 o e tA REPO RVRECOM MEN DATION ,^'[btt'pgP1' Iv 18BB TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # FROM: Francis Hoffman ; J ❑ Consent City Engineer For Craig Swanson, Information Only ❑ Traffic Safety Coordinator Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 5 December, 1994 0 To Council SUBJECT: Attached Petition Action El Motion Regarding Benton Avenue & Johnson Drive - Stop Sign ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Review if Council so desires. Info /Background: The issue of stopping westbound Benton at Johnson Drive was before the Edina City Council on November 7, 1994. The Traffic Safety staff review indicated that Benton not be stopped at Johnson Drive, but a physical change be made to the street to better protect walkers on the sidewalk by changing the curb style from a drive over curb as currently exists, to a bridge crossing style which is ten inches high and provides better curb protection. Engineering staff reviewed the site and concurred with earlier comments that speed was not the major issue but drivers could easily drive on the sidewalk due to the style of curbing. Public Works installed two additional bollards at the second curve in the road (west of Johnson Drive) where people were driving on the sidewalk. Additionally, evergreen trees were trimmed to improve sight distances. However, the petitioner has submitted a new petition (see attached information). Petitioners believe that a Stop sign westbound is still an appropriate alternative. November 30, 1994 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members: Attached please find the following: A) Petition To The City Council requesting a stop sign at the corner of Benton Avenue and Johnson Drive. B) Survey by Edina's City Engineer's Office of Benton Ave. westbound at Johnson on November 9th, 1994 at 7:00- 9:00am. C)Letter from Mr. Kenneth R. Hatch (Principal, Countryside Elementary School) to Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor, dated November 26, 1994. D) Letter from Mrs. Cindy Larson (USPS letter carrier) to the Edina City Council Members dated November 29,1994. E) Map showing the overhead view of the Benton Avenue and Johnson Drive area. In addition to myself. numerous concerned neighbors and parents will be attending the December 5th, 1994 meeting to further discuss this issue. Sincerely, Rick Danmeier 5600 Benton Avenue Edina, MN 55436 925 -0463 F �A R- A I VIA tt� Cl) O The City Council City of Edina Petition Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the s following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition form if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: 1. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, etc. 2. Precise location(s) of the requested improvements 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the properties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the council 4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone num- ber, and property address 5. Signature of person circulating the petition If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 927 -8861 between 8:OOAM and 4:30PM. -*uu4 A4�-- MARCELLA DAEHN CITY CLERK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE: I //a g'� ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: a5-10) 5-D-P 51GA1 To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. C ('-vit(Z. 04� -304+NSc h.) Z P-5" - Mf--'j between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and OCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE j' VJ- _��,6� _. This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) r ,- PROPERTY ADDRESS SszS Psi -ro►J ��= Jig 61 Afa -1 OWNER'S PHONE 5 �- 316-71 9ZO -01791 —4:Dao r3C�r�i gZS - 04.3 tiAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1990 IIAFA PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE t -ly oo" I. OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) 2.a4L' L i k4 -14 V-C- Y) -5C,U.lci PROPERTY ADDRESS J c I OWNER'S PHONE cz- 6 -- / q-1 r72 d 7/ ra C, 4;- C- W* 7 - ,97/ (v tf, le- 6, � /I Cf V, Sr qA -7 u C, z;" /f AL' ) Q i Y J A rts c,# DAL Z7 Z;a2m? Ayi, �:� I - LAI �6oL4 �e�v\fzu Vfr-7 Z2 Z-' jL -3 1 q'I 2- - -3o --7.2 -3CC Tt; � l 6 L/AA e P C), Z;a2m? Ayi, �:� I - LAI �6oL4 �e�v\fzu Vfr-7 Z2 Z-' jL -3 1 q'I 2- - -3o --7.2 Owt4� (> QX--- -7 - - ---------- �Ao -4-c>--7(, , � 36 Y? ,d,r5ZY_7_ 'I Z). - sx_l_"_;. at 1)) -j53q owNer�_s wAmC-- p Rw PETV, F ?ajt .Ta��) TI 4 r J-4) 5�0�� st � ►s, )1 ��1 i.Sl�n Air D rl IAN/ _!t T AD 0 IWSS --I ..... �V__c 59 GIR C_ _cx--t- L65__&,,2y4f -,-e- P-\ 2�/,7 Civ 6 � -7 4? ..... �V__c 59 GIR C_ _cx--t- L65__&,,2y4f -,-e- P-\ 2�/,7 Civ 6 � � � �i�'l ��i�- 5�P S i �c►.i o W? jclm�' P2e;PGJZr ' �77� �'-`'� /L �_ w�_.- - � '.vim• n %'rte - �3. � :3 !t���•�- ?`� ��:� 1rG �.-� '••r T TI ,. , I n 0 JE J-37 13 ease l Lv��s �c s�L J��s�� -All WC-0-1711Y /� ti• .J -�e�n S&(sa4u n aA d,3 ar�- A 0 D 2.E51S c_ S7 J SSZv �2vL� S77 55o Y (Sro vrL . rove. -r1' SHog Sti�zsa.� jr 14 ��r13 alWvLoi�k'Q. CoRijefL oc - A 0 D P-,G$S �Z°(- 61�Z'(or� 1� `o„�r+- �C�a�.�r�` JC 33 - ------- ---- bentpn Ave o f Tohn-son p, o L) q -i± 19 9 7.00 -q-00 A w\ Nuvybt.r �� alsv lrr�lU�cd IYl "�o�a\ Nun . ►� CQrs Cvur�� 1 `IS - ch.� 3' Ire,- 6' 3c�- 8 'i5 - Zc,Icx► l' X15 S ov z3 i &30 nlvmhcr 3S 3a 39 53 COrS �E NurY i1�er _- c�rs v ►, �.aal K pedestr Ian h. Kes Nuvybt.r �� alsv lrr�lU�cd IYl "�o�a\ Nun . ►� CQrs Cvur�� November 26, 1994 t -ucnng ine rugure Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: I'm writing to you concerning the safety of students in the neighborhood surrounding Countryside Elementary School. The specific concerns are: 1. Going east from the school walking down Benton Avenue. We are fortunate that we have sidewalks going down that street. The major danger area expressed by many parents and students is by the pond. A solution posed has been to place a stop sign at the bottom of the hill at the corner of Benton and Johnson. If that is done, I believe it would also be necessary to place another sign at the top of the hill warning about the stop sign. The petition shows a large number of cars through that area during the hours students are walking to school. Because of the multiple stops at Tracy and Benton, we have school patrol students posted in the morning, noon and after school. 2. Going north on Stuart Avenue and then east and west on Grove Street. There are no sidewalks available for students so walking is potentially dangerous, especially in the winter when the snow banks are high. I know that you have safety and engineering specialists that are aware of these concerns, but please let me know if I can help in any way. Sincerely, 4- A. enneth R. Hatch Countryside Principal Countryside Elementary School, 5701 Benton Avenue, Edina, MN 55436 (612)929 -7549 November 29, 1994 Edina City Council 4801 West 50t Street Edina. MN 55424 Dear Council Members: I am writing in regards to your meeting of November 7. 1994 subject being the excessive speed of traffic around the Johnson Drive. Benton Avenue neighborhood. I am very concerned! I have worked as a USPS letter carrier in this area for 9 -1/2 years. I cannot tell you how many times I have come close to being hit in this area. Lucky for me the other cars have ended up in the grass by the pond or I have been able to get into the driveways of my customers. You know this has been a problem area. Just a few years ago the big posts and chains were put up on the south side. 5601 Benton Avenue through 5523 Benton Avenue, because of property damage. Now it's time to take a look at the north side. There is so much at stake here. This is the way many children go to school and come home at night and we want them to come home. I want to make it home too! Accidents happen in a matter of seconds. We need to slow these people down. This is why I am writing asking you to please discuss this situation further in hopes that you will come to the decision to place a stop sign on Benton Avenue at the Johnson Drive intersection. There is no comparison to the price of a stop sign and the price of a life. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Cindy Larson .� t 1al►iad .era, - r � i9L� t�'>I� Nb _• ,�r••FIw� r 1 .i�� .- "Yt I • � i REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MANAGER ROSLAND FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1994 SUBJECT: PETITION FOR STREET LIGHTING - CREEK VALLEY ROAD Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.B Consent Information Only F-1 Mgr. Recommends[] To HRA ElTo Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion To refer the petition for street lighting on Creek Valley Road to the Engineering Department for processing. InfoBackground: The attached petition requesting street lighting opposite 5716 Creek Valley Road was received from the residents immediately adjacent. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ WATERMAIN 0 STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: CURB AND�GWMR ntiz� v awti �Ab� To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements lied above to the locations listed below. r"�Z �° `'`� s� °� °� �►, La t�� V w -� �Z, e� \ Cam." ` ` e -roc LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. -a'- PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) wit/ PROPERTY ADDRESSU OWNER'S PHONE Z C --,X l/n 1� ev f`h4/ t% 5-1 \(, g725�-S -OO�J sl C c V,4,Ey Q, 94-4 - `l Sg0 - I ff�� 3y93 This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. —�C`L._,,, CPrEMBER IM i Co 'a 4 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL I FROM: JOHN WALLIN FINANCE DIRECTOR I DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1994 I SUBJECT: FEES AND CHARGES Recommendation: Agenda Item # XI.B.C.D.E Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion © Resolution © Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt Ordinance No. 1994 -12 (waive second reading) and the fee resolutions as presented. InfoBackground: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges proposed for 1995: 1) Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund and for the Utility Fund. The fees preceded by an " *' were added, deleted or increased from 1994 to 1995. 2) Ordinance No. 1994 -12 - Amending Code Section 185 3) Resolution - Park and Recreation Fees 4) Resolution - Ambulance Fees 5) Resolution - Hazmat Fees CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES NO. OF FEE NO. FEES NO. OF 1995 FIRE PERMITS FEE REVENUE SPRINKLER PERMIT: • 110 -117 SPRINKLER PERMIT • 118 FIRE PUMP INSTALL • 119 STANDPIPE INSTAL ONLY • 120 EACH ADDITIONAL 350-650 4 TOTAL SPRINKLER 1 500 GAS PUMP, TANK & BURN: 400 95 -98 SPECIAL HAZARD • 105 GREASE VENT 6.5% TOTAL COST 121 FIRE ALARM SYST 25,000 100 FIRE EXT SERV 20,000 35 TOTAL PUMP TANK 125 FALSE ALARMS 65 AMBULANCE: • RESOLUTION LEVEL I • RESOLUTION LEVEL II • RESOLUTION LEVEL III • RESOLUTION LEVEL IV. • RESOLUTION LEVEL V • RESOLUTION OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION • RESOLUTION MILEAGE FROM SCENE 10,000 11 TOTAL AMBULANCE 2,500 11 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2,500 RESOLUTION ENGIN CO • RESOLUTION HAZMAT UNIT RESOLUTION PERSONNEL RESOLUTION EQUIP & SUPPLIES TOTAL HAZARDOUS ASSESSING MANAGER SPEC. ASSESSMENT SEARCH PLANNING 85 SIGN PERMIT 86 BENCH COURTESY 87 SIGN VARIANCE -RES 88 SIGN VARIANCE -COMM TOTAL SIGN PLANNING FEES: 160 NBR PROPERTY OWNER 560,000 180 RESTRICTED PARKING 577,000 181 0 -50 SPACES 182 5 1 -100 SPACES 183 100 -200 SPACES 184 OVER 200 SPACES • 192 -194 REZONING. 195 RETAIL SALE IN PID 196 COND USE PERMIT 199 FINAL DEVL PLAN 161 LOT DIVISION • 162 SUBDIVISION 3,000 163 DEVELOPER FEE/PLAN A VARIANCE 190 RESIDENTIAL 191 COMMERCIAL CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF 1995 100 PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE 300 40-305 1 300 40-304 150 80 400 82 350-650 4 80 1 500 82 400 7 6 7 350 + $50/LOT 7 6.5% TOTAL COST 40 100 25,000 200 10 20,000 35 35-125 35 35-125 65 50 65 52 30 STATE CODE 30 STATE CODE 20' 15 20 15 6,000 10,000 11 225 2,500 11 230 2,500 1,500 155 2,200 160 345 355 420 435 485 500 590 610 24 25 6.501MILE 7/MILE 560,000 577,000 165/HR 170/HR 330 340 PAY RATE PAY RATE AT COST + 15% AT COST + 15% 3,000 3,000 200 10 110 60 12 100 200 500 $1 /OWNER 1 500 1 100 150 250 400 3 350-650 4 300 1 500 5 400 7 50 7 350 + $50/LOT 7 6.5% TOTAL COST 40 100 10 200 2,000 60 10 2,000 110 60 12 100 200 8,000 8,000 500 $1 /OWNER 1 500 100 150 250 400 3 400-700 4 300 1 500 5 500 7 50 7 400 + $50/LOT 6.5% TOTAL COST 40 100 10 200. • • • • • FEE NO. FEES 25,198 LANDSCAPING 197 TEMPORARY COND USE 170 VACATION APPLICATIONS 230 VARIANCE FOR RV STORAGE RESOLUTION COMPLIANCE LETTERS NA TOTAL PLANNING 7 POLICE 18 MASSAGE & AMUSEMENT 1 PUBLIC DANCE 5 LAWFUL GAMBLING 10 MECH AMUSE DEVICE LOCAT I I EACH MACHINE 225 LOUDSPEAKER PERMIT 265 PARKING PERMIT 266 REFUND ON STICKER MANAGER HANDGUN CARRY PERMIT 285 BUSINESS MASSAGE LICENSE 286 INDIV. MASSAGE LICENSE 286a ADDITIONAL LOCATION 281 INVEST FEE -INDIV. LIC. 288 INVEST FEE - BUSINESS LIC. 289 SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUISINESS 289a INVEST FEE - SEXUALLY ORIENTED 291 IMPOUNDED VEVICLE 0 TOTAL MASSAGE & AMUSEMENT 220 FALSE ALARM 0 DOG & IMPOUNDING FEES: 0 IMPOUNDING: 15 DAILY CARE 16 FIRST OFFENSE/YR 17 SECOND OFFENS/YR 18 THIRD OFFENSE/YR 19 DISPOSAL 20 DOG LICENSE 20 NEUTERED LICENSE 22 DUPLICATE LICENSE 23 KENNEL LICENSE 24 EXTRA DOG OR CAT 21 DOG LICENSE RENEWAL 21 DOG LICENSE RENEW S/N NEW LATE CHARGE NEW LATE CHARGE/SPAYED 1 TOTAL DOG & IMPOUNDING 8 CITY CLERK 8 BEER & LIQUOR: 205 SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE 206 ON -SALE LIQUOR 207 ON -SALE BEER RENWL 208 ON -SALE BEER NEW 209 OFF -SALE BEER RENW 210 OFF -SALE BEER NEW 211 TEMP 3.2 BEER LICENSE 0 ON -SALE WINE: 212 50 OR < SEATS 213 51 - 100 SEATS 214 101 - 150 SEATS 215 OVER 150 SEATS 216 MANAGERS LICENSE CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS 10 100 10 5 75 5 6 100 6 3 50 3 50 50 50 12,500 A.- 1995 FEE REVENUE 100 75 100 50 50 12,500 4 35 0 35 5 10 3 10 32 40 224 40 NA 5 7 5 18 6 20 10 NA 3/MONTH NA 3/MONTH NA 3/MONTH NA 3/MONTH I 690 0 10 0 200 0 200 6 55 25 65 6 865 6 25 24 55 5 65 10 1,500 0 1,500 0 200 0 200 0 1,500 0 1,500 NA AS POSTED NA AS POSTED 2,000 480 95 40,000 480 95 100 12 100 12 140 30 140 30 4 55 4 55 1 105 1 105 8 15 8 15 100 25 100 25 300 12 300 12 10 6 10 6 0 55 0 55 1 100 50 11 50 11 150 8 150 8 NA 25 NA 25 NA 12 NA 12 13,000 2 200 2 200 2 650 2 650 21 210 22 220 NA 270 NA 280 6 210 5 220 NA 270 NA 280 2 40 1 45 I 690 0 720 3 750 4 785 5 810 3 850 6 865 8 905 54 60 52 65 2,000 45; 15,000 CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES FEE NO. FEES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF 1995 PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE • 261 SIDEWALK CAFE PERMIT 1 500 TOTAL BEER & LIQUOR 23,000 26,000 • 290 RESTRICTIVE ROAD PERMIT 400 5 2,000 HEALTH POOL & SPA: __. • 81 INDOOR SWIM POOL 25 295 25 310 • 82 OUTDOOR SWIM POOL 31 155 31 160 • 83 WHIRLPOOL 13 75 13 80 TOTAL POOL & SPA 13,000 13,500 FOOD & SOFT DRINKS: 130 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYS. 0 25 0 25 135 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT 80 410 80 450 • 135 MANAGER CERTIFIED NA 360 NA 400 • 135 ADDED FACILITY 20 110 20 120 • 136 DAY CARE LMTED FOOD 2 125 2 140 • 137 TAKE OUT FOOD 30 275 30 300 • 137 MANAGER CERTIFIED 1 225 1 250 138 PACKAGED FOOD 1 130 1 135 139 FOOD WAREHOUSE 0 70 0 70 • 140 CATERING FOOD EST 0 410 0 450 • 140 MANAGER CERTIFIED NA 360 NA 400 140 ADDED FACILITY 0 110 0 120 141 ITINERANT FOOD EST 30 70 30 80 142 RETAIL CANDY SHOP 0 50 0 55 ADDITIONAL FACILITY 10 • 143 POTENTIALLY HAZARDS VEHICLE 5 80 5, 90 • 144 FLEET OF 5 OR MORE 0 400 0, 450 • 145 CATERING VEHICLE 0 150 0 165 • 145 ADDED VEHICLE 0 25 0 30 • 146 FOOD VEHICLE 0 80 0 90 • 147 FLEET OF 5 OR MORE 0 400 0 450 • 147a PUSHCART NA 120 NA 130 148 FOOD VENDING MACH 300 15 300 15 149 FOOD EST PLAN 0 100% LICNS FEE 0 100% LICNS FEE 150 MINIMUM FEE 25 25 151 FOOD EST PLAN REMO 10 50% LICNS FEE 10 50% LICNS FEE HOTEL LICENSE 155 50 OR < ROOMS 1 200 1 200 155 OVER 50 ROOMS 0 $1/ ADDED ROOM 0 $1/ ADDED ROOM 156 LODGING LICENSE 0 60 0 60 TOTAL FOOD & SOFTDRINK 50,930 51,710 SCAVENGER & GARBAGE COLLECTORS: • 270 GARBAGE HAULER 10 120 17 200 270 ADDED VEHICLE 20 50 64 50 • 275 SCAVENGER LIC 0 30 0 150 • 275 RENEWAL 3 20 3. 100 276 SCAVENGER PERMIT 0 20 5 20 TOTAL SCAVENGER & GARBAGE 2,200 7,000 280 TOBACCO 30 250 7,500 30 250 7,500 BUILDING BUILDING PERMITS BUILDING PERMITS 1,000 1,000 FEE CALCULATION: • 30 $0-$500 $20.00 $20.50 CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES FEE NO. FEES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF 1995 PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE 31 $501 - $2,000 $20.00+ S20.50+ $2.50 /added $100 $3.00 /added $100 > $500 > $500 32 $2,001 - $25,000 $57.50+ $65.50+ $9.50 /added $1000 $9.80 /added $1000 > $2,000 > $2,000 • 33 $25,001 - $50,000 $276.00+ S290.90+ $7.00 /added $1000 $7.25 /added $1000 > $25,000 > $25,000 34 $50,001 - $100,000 $451.00+ $472.15+ $5.00 /added $1000 $5.20 /added $1000 > $50,000 > $50,000 • 35 $100,001 - $500,000 S701.00+ $732.15+ $4.00 /added $1000 $4.15 /added $1000 > $100,000 > $100,000 • 36 $500,001 - $1,000,000 S2,301.00+ S2,392.15+ $3.00 /added $1000 $3.10 /added $1000 > $500,000 > $500,000 • 37 $1,000,000 & OVER S3,801.00+ $3,942.15+ $2.00 /added $1000 $2.05 /added $1000 - > $1,000,000 > $1,000,000 • 38 REINSPECTION 0 31 0 32 CODE COMPLIANCE INSP • 39 RESIDENTIAL 6 78 6 80 • 40 COMMERCIAL 3 155 3 160 41 LICENSE SURCHARGE 5 5 45 MOVING OF BLDGS. 0 206 0 212 46 INDEMNITY FOR DAMAGES 0 515 0 530 50 STREET EXCAVATION 0 $10 /100 FEET 0 $10 /100 FEET 50a MONITORING WELL NA $50/WELL NA $50/WELL STREET SURFACE REPAIR 20 20 51 UNDER 10 SQ FEET $15 /SQ FOOT $15 /SQ FOOT 52 10 - 25 SQ FEET $10 /SQ FOOT $10 /SQ FOOT • 53 OVER 25 SQ FEET $5 /SQ FOOT $7 /SQ.FOOT • 55 INSTALLER'S LICENSE 0 52 0 55 • 56 GASFITTING LICENSE 0 52 0 55 76 WATER COND. INSTAL. 0 25 0 25 165 RADIO & TV ANTENNAS 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 175 TREE REMOVE/GRADING 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 176 EXCAVATION /OPEN PIT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 80 POOL CONSTRUCTION 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 90 PARKING RAMP LICENSE 100 100 260 CURB CUT 25 35 TOTAL BUILDING PERMITS 500,000 575,000 PLUMBING: MINIMUM FEE: 3,600 3,600 60 RESIDENTIAL 21.00 22.00 61 COMMERCIAL 26.00 27.00 FEE CALCULATION: • 62 $0- $1,000 $15.00+ $16.00+ - 3.00 %> $500 3.10 %> $500 • 63 $1,001 - $5,000 $30.00+ $31.50+ 2.50 %> $1,000 2.60 %> $1,000 • 64 $5,001 - $10,000 $130.00+ $135.50+ 2.10 %> $5,000 2.15 %> $5,000 • 65 $10,001 - $25,000 $235.00 + 1.80% $243.00 + 1.85% > $10,000 > $10,000 • 66 $25,001 - $50,000 $505.00 + 1.60% $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 > $25,000 67 $50,001 & OVER $905.00 + 1.25% $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 > $50,000 TOTAL PLUMBING PERMITS 67,000 70,000 HEATING, VENTILATION & FEE NO. FEES MECHANICAL: MINIMUM FEE: • 68 RESIDENTIAL • 69 COMMERCIAL 21.00 22.00 FEE CALCULATION: • 70 $0 - $1,000 • 71 $1,001 - $5,000 • 72 $5,001 - $10,000 • 73 $10,000 - $25,000 • 74 $25,001 - $50,000 • 75 $50,001 & OVER $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 TOTAL HEATING & VENT $905.00 + 1.25% $933.00 + 1.30% PARK AND RECREATION > $50,000 95,000 REGISTRATION FEE: RESOLUTION PLAYGROUND RESOLUTION AQUATIC INSTR RESOLUTION COACH PITCH RESOLUTION TENNIS INSTR RESOLUTION FIELD USE FEE RESOLUTION RINK FEE RESOLUTION ATHLETIC ASSN FEE RESOLUTION PEEWEE TENNIS RESOLUTION TEAM TENNIS TOTAL PARK REGISTRATION OTHER CHARGES ENGINEERING & CLERICAL • MUNICIPAL COURT FINES • CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS • POLICE SERVICES CONTRIBUTION FROM LIQUOR FUND SALES & RENTAL PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE • INCOME ON INVESTMENTS LABORATORY FEES DONATIONS • SERVICES HRA MAINT ASSMT -50TH HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT OTHER TOTAL FEES & CHARGES UTILITIES SEWER RENTAL CHARGE: 235 SGL FAM. < 1600 CU FT 236 > 1600 CU FT • 237 4 -UNIT APTS • 238 COMM & IND BLDGS 239 IND USER SEWER STRENGTH CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF 1995 PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE 2,200 2,200 0 21.00 22.00 26.00 27.00 $15.00+ $16.00+ 3.00 %> $500 3.10 %> $500 $30.00+ $31.50+ 2.50 %> $1,000 2.60 %> $1,000 $130.00+ $135.50+ 2.10 %> $5,000 2.15 %> $5,000 $235.00 + 1.80% $243.00 + 1.85% > $10,000 > $10,000 $505.00 + 1.60% $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 > $25,000 $905.00 + 1.25% $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 > $50,000 95,000 110,000 400 10 400 10 0 0 0 0 350 26 350 26 300 27 300 27 5,500 6 5,500 7 175,000 180,000 1,000 7 77 17 77 17 17 37 17 37 75,000 91,000 140,000 140,000 470,000 425,000 131,000 135,000 0 75,000 380,000 383,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 45,000 35,000 10,000 12,000 500 500 175,000 180,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 3,500 4,000 2,952,630 3,130,210 24.32/QTR 1.52/100 CU FT 117.00+21.75 > 4 OR 1.52/100 CU FT 301WATER METER OR 1.52/100 CU FT 25.60 /QTR 1.60/100 CU FT 123.50+23.00 > 4 OR 1.60/100 CU FT 321WATER METER OR 1.60/100 CU FT CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES FEE NO. FEES NO. OF 1994 NO. OF 1995 PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE * 250 SAC 800 850 WATER SERVICE: * 244 EAST OF BEARD AV 1.30 /100 CU FT 1.30/100 CU FT * 244 MORNINGSIDE AREA 1.30/100 CU FT 1.30/100 CU FT * 245 LESS THAN 1600 CU FT 15.60 /QTR DELETE * 242 ALL OTHER AREAS .53/100 CU FT .56/100 CU FT ■ 245 LESS THAN 1600 CU FT 8.48 /QTR DELETE * NEW METER CHARGE * NEW 1/2" AND 5/8" METER 6.60 /QTR * NEW 3/4" METER 7.26 /QTR * NEW 1" METER 9.24 /QTR * NEW 1 1/4" METER 10.56 /QTR * NEW 1 1/2" METER - 11.88 /QTR * NEW 2" METER 19.14 /QTR * NEW 3" METER 72.60 /QTR * NEW 4" METER 92.40 /QTR FLAT WATER CHARGE: 246 PARK DEPT /SPRINK/SKATE 2,500 2,500 247 ST DEPT/FLUSH 1,000 1,000 240 CURB WATER STOPS 12.50/EA 12.50/EA 241 ISSUE WATER METER COST + COST + 251 CONNECTION CHARGE COST COST 255 STORM WATER DRAINAGE 5.00 1QTR 5.00 /QTR RECYCLING * 131 SINGLE FAMILY 4.20 /QTR 6.06 /QTR * 132 DOUBLE BUNGALOW 4.20 /QTR 6.06 /QTR * 133 APTS CONDOS 2 - 8 UNITS 2.30 /QTR 4.80 /QTR ORDINANCE NO. 1994 -12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SCHEDULE A OF EDINA CODE SECTION 185 TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES AND TO ADD OR DELETE CERTAIN FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 410 410.02, Building permit: Subd. 1 Total valuation of work: $1.00 to $500.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 *$20.50 *$20.50 for first $500.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 *$65.50 for first $2,000.00 plus $9.80 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 *$290.90 for first $25,000.00 plus $7.25 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 *$472.15 for first $50,000.00 FEE NO. 30 31 32 33 34 plus $5.20 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 *$732.15 for the first 35 $100,000.00 plus $4.15 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 *$2392.15 for the first 36 $500,000.00 plus $3.10 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up *$3942.15 for the first 37 $1,000,000.00 plus $2.05 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof *plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 168.70 410 410.02, Reinspection fee assessed $32.00 per hour or the total 38 Subd. 1 under provisions of UBC, hourly cost to city, whichever is Section 305 (g) greatest. (Includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 1 SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT V FEE NO. > $ 1,000.00 410 410.02, Building Code $ 80.00 residential 39 plus 1.85% Subd. 1 compliance inspection $160.00 commercial 40 415 415.02 Permit for moving of building $212.00 67 45 415 415.02, Indeminity deposit for $530.00, unless licensed by 46 Subd. 3 damages substained by moving Commissioner of Transportation - *$27.00 69 warm air heating and *plus surcharge of building, r to air conditioning or M.S. 16B.70 420 420.07, Street surface repair: Over 25 sq. ft. - $7.00 /sq. ft. 53 Subd.2.J contract price as follows: $ 0- 1,000.00 *$ 16.00 + 3.108 of anything 430 430.07, Oil burner installer's $ 55.00 over 1,000.00 55 5,001.00- 10,000.00 *$135.50 + 2.158 Subd. 8 license, stoker installer's 72 10,001.00- 25,000.00 *$243.00 + 1.858 of anything over 10,000.00 73 license, steam or hot water of anything over 25,000.00 74 50,001.00 and over *$933.00 + 1.308 of anything heating installer's license, 75 *plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 mechanical warm air heating and air conditioning installer's license, refrigeration installer's license 430 430.03, Gas piping installer's $ 55.00 56 license 435 435.07 Gas piping permit Minimum Fee: Residential - *$22.00 60 Commercial - *$27.00 61 Fee Calculations: $ 0 -$ 1,000 *$ 16.00 plus 3.10% > $ 500.00 62 $ 1,001 -$ 5,000 *$ 31.50 plus 2.60% > $ 1,000.00 63 $ 5,001- $10,000 *$135.50 plus 2.;_.': > $ 5,000.00 64 $10,001 - $25,000 *$243.00 plus 1.85% > $10,000.00 65 $25,001- $50,000 *$520.50 plus 1.65 -!)5,000.00 66 $50,001 & over *$933.00 plus 1.30% ._ .1000.00 67 *plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 435 435.07 Oil burner, stoker, Minimum Fee: steam or hot water Single Family - *$22.00 68 heating, mechanical Commercial - *$27.00 69 warm air heating and *plus surcharge p'7 *~ r to air conditioning or M.S. 16B.70 refrigeration permit All fees for above permits based on contract price as follows: $ 0- 1,000.00 *$ 16.00 + 3.108 of anything over $ 500.00 70 1,001.00- 5,000.00 *$ 31.50 + 2.608 of anything over 1,000.00 71 5,001.00- 10,000.00 *$135.50 + 2.158 of anything over 5,000.00 72 10,001.00- 25,000.00 *$243.00 + 1.858 of anything over 10,000.00 73 25,001.00 - 50,000.00 *$520.50 + 1.658 of anything over 25,000.00 74 50,001.00 and over *$933.00 + 1.308 of anything over 50,000.00 75 *plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 OA SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0, 450 450.27, Public or semi- $310.00 per annum for each pool enclosed 81 Subd. 4 public swimming part or all of the year pool license $160.00 per annum for each outdoor pool 82 450 450.27, Public or semi- $80.00 per.annum for each bath or pool 83 Subd. 4 public whirlpool bath or therapeutic swimming pool license 620 620.04 Permit fee for $52.00 for each permit 105 cleaning of commercial cooking ventilation system 625 625.04 Sprinkler permit fees: 110 Number of heads 1 - 5 *$ 40.00 (minimum fee) 6 - 10 *$ 65.00 11 - 20 *$ 90.00 21 - 30 *$115.00 31 - 40 *$135.00 41 - 50 *$155.00 51 - 60 *$175.00 61 - 70 *$189.00 71 - 80 *$203.00 81 - 90 *$217.00 91 - 100 *$226.00 101 - 110 *$235.00 111 - 120 *$244.00 121 - 130 *$252.00 131 - 140 *$260.00 141 - 150 *$268.00 151 - 160 *$276.00 161 - 170 *$283.00 171 - 180 *$290.00 181 - 190 *$297.00 191 - 200 *$304.00 201 plus *$304.00 for first 200 plus $7.00 for each additional head *plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 168.70 625 625.03 Fire pump installation $82.00 118 and associated hardware Standpipe installation $82.00 119 Each additional $ 9.00 120 standpipe 635 635.02 False fire alarm $230.00 for the third and each 125 subsequent response within one calendar year 3 SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0, 716 716.02 Recyling service: Single family $ 6.06 per quarter 131 Double bungalow 6.06 per quarter 132 Apartments /condos 4.80 per quarter 133 (2 -8 units) 720 720.04, Food establishment $450.00 per annum, $400.00 if 135 Subd. 3 license certified pursuant to Subsection 720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code, plus $120.00 per annum for each additional facility Day care, limited $140.00 per annum 136 food establishment license Take -out food facility $300.00 per annum, $250.00 if 137 license certified pursuant to Subsection. 720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code Packaged food sales $135.00 per annum 138 license Catering food $450.00 per annum, $400.00 if 140 establishment license certified pursuant to Subsection 720.04, Subd. 3C of this Code, plus $120.00 per annum for each additional facility Itinerant food $80.00 per event 141 establishment license Retail candy shop $55.00 per annum, plus $10.00 per 142 license annum for each additional facility Potentially hazardous $90.00 per annum 143 food vehicle license Fleet of 5 or more $450.00 per annum 144 potentially hazardous food vehicles license Catering food vehicle $165.00 per annum, plus $30.00 per 145 license annum for each additional vehicle Food vehicle license $ 90.00 per annum 146 Fleet of 5 or more $450.00 per annum 147 food vehicles license Pushcart license $130.00 per annum 147a 810 810.09 Plat and subdivision For division of one or more lots where filing fee no new buildable lots are created: $50.00 per lot 161 For all other plats and subdivisions: $400.00 plus $50.00 per lot 162 850 850.04, Fee for transfer of $400.00 for (one) R -2 lot 192 Subd. 2, land to another $500.00 for (two) R -2 lots 193 A.2 zoning district $700.00 for all other transfers 194 850 850.04, Application fee for $500.00 199 Subd. 6 final development plan 4 SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF 'FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0, 900 900.06, Non- intoxicating malt Subd. 1 liquor license: On -sale $220.00 per annum (renewal) 207 $280.00 per annum (new) 208 900 900.04, Off -sale $220.00 per annum (renewal) 209 Subd. 2 $280.00 per annum (new) 900 900.16, Temporary on -sale $45.00 211 Subd. 3 non - intoxicating malt liquor license 900 900.16, On -sale wine license (per year): Subd. 1 Restaurants with 50 or fewer seats - ..$720.00 212 51 - 100 seats, inclusive - $785.00 213 101 - 150'seats, inclusive.- $850.00 214 Over 150 seats - $905.00 215 900 900.17, Manager's license $65.00 per year 216 Subd. 6A 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker permit $10.00 per permit 225 1100 1100.03, Sewer service charge: Subd. 2 Single family dwellings, Based upon water usage during winter town houses, two - family quarter (Three month period falling dwellings, apartment between November 1 and March 1) buildings containing four or less dwelling units: To and including 1600 $25.60 quarter 235 cubic feet From 1601 cubic feet $1.60 per 100 cubic feet 236 and over Apartment buildings with $123.50 plus $23.00 for each unit over 237 more than four dwelling four, or $1.60 per 100 cubic feet of units water during the quarter, whichever is greater 1100 1100.03, Sewer service charge: $32.00 per water meter or approved 238 Subd. 2 Commercial and sewage metering device on premises, or industrial buildings, $1.60 per 100 cubic feet of water used including shools during the quarter, whichever is and churches greater 1100 1100.03, Water service: 1. $0.56 per 100 cubic feet for all 242 Subd. 2 areas of City, except areas described below in 2. 2. $1.30 per 100 cubic feet for 244 Morningside area and for east side of Beard Av. from West 54th St. to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott P1. from West 54th St. to Beard Av. 5 SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 1100 1100.03, Meter charge: 1/2 inch and 5/8 inch meter $ 6.60 /quarter 245 Subd. 2 3/4 inch meter 7.26 /quarter 1 inch meter 9.24 /quarter 1 1/4 inch meter 10.56 /quarter 1 1/2 inch meter 11.88 /quarter 2 inch meter 19.14 /quarter 3 inch meter 72.60 /quarter 4 inch meter 92.40 /quarter 1105 1105.01, Service Availability $850.00 per SAC unit x number of SAC 250 Subd. 1 Charge (SAC) units computed pursuant to Subsection 1105.01, Subd. 1 of this Code 1205 1205.01 Curb cut permit $35.00 260 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk cafe permit $500.00 261 1300 1300.02, Refuse or recycling. $200.00 per annum for first vehicle, 270 Subd. 1 hauler license $50.00 for each additional vehicle 1305 1305.03 Scavenger license $150.00 for first license, $100.00 175 for each annual renewal thereof. 1340 1340.06, License for individual $65.00 for individual license 286 Subd. 1 performing massage or escort services 1340 1340.06, Investigation fee at $65.00 287 Subd. 2 time of original application for an individual license Section 2. Schedule A to Section 185 is hereby amended by adding the following fees thereto: SEC. SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0, 300 300.03, Dog license renewal $25.00 per dog or 21a Subd.3 (late charge after $12.00 per neutered dog March 1) 1340 1340.06, Individual massage $25.00 286a . Subd. 1 license (additional location) 1400 1400.01, Truck restrictive road $5.00 290 Subd.2C permit Section 3. Schedule A to Section 185 is hereby amended by renumbering Fee No. 290 as Fee No. 291 (Redemption of impounded vehicle). Section 4. Following publication, the effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 1995. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on ATTEST: City Clerk F Mayor cv9tN��j o e 1 v REPORWRECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM= John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation DATE: December 2, 1994 SUBJECT: Park and Recreation Dept. fees and charges for 1995 Agenda Item # XI . C Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Edina Park Board recommends that the Edina City Council approve the proposed 1995 Park and Recreation fees and charges that are attached as an addendum. Info/Background: On Tuesday, November 8, 1994, the Edina Park Board reviewed and discussed the 1995 Park and Recreation fees and charges as proposed by staff. Changes made by the Edina Park Board were to increase the staff proposed Braemar Executive Course patron greens fees from $6.50 to $7.00 and non - patron greens fees from $7.50 to $8.00. In addition, the Edina Park Board recommended not to charge the proposed $1.00 per participant administrative fee to the youth athletic associations at this time. The Edina Park Board has asked staff to further research the services provided to the youth athletic associations and re- evaluate and re- define the role that staff plays.in relationship to the 13 Edina youth athletic associations. 1995 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES DESCRIPTION 1995 1994 1993 Family Bold, indicates an increase $35.00 $35.00 PARK & RECREATION $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Playground $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Coach Pitch $30.00 $30.00 $25.00 Tennis Instruction $30.00 $27.00 $27.00 Pee Wee Tennis $20.00 $17.00 $17.00 Team Tennis $55.00 $33.00 $33.00 ART CENTER Memberships $105.00 $100.00 $96.00 Family $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Individual $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Class Fees* Non -Mem /Mem Non - Mem /Mem Non - Mem /Mem based on # of hrs 25 hrs $3.50/3.25 $3.2513.00 $3.10/2.90 24 hrs $4.00/3.58 $3.50/3.25 $3.35/3.10 21 hrs $4.25/3.81 $3.75/3.50 $3.60/3.35 14 hrs $4.50/4.07 $4.00/3.75 $3.85/3.60 12 hrs $4.7514.25 $4.25 /3.82 $4.10/3.67 8 hrs $5.00/4.50 $4.50 /4.02 $4.35/3.87 5 hrs $5.2514.60 $4.75 /4.25 $4.35/3.87 4 hrs $5.65/5.25 $5.15/4.65 $4.35 /3.87 *all clay and children's classes add $5 $100.00 $95.00 $90.0 Parent/Child Workshops* $60.00 $50.00 $501 (includes 1 child & 1 adult) Non- Mem/Mem Non - Mem /Mem Non- Mem /Mer- 90 min $15/13 $15/13 $15/ 2 hrs $17/15 $17/15 $17/1, 3 hrs $21/19 $21/19 $21/19 4 hrs $27/25 $27/25 $27/25 5 hrs $31/28 $31/28 $31/28 6 hrs $34/31 $34/31 $34/31 7 hrs $39/35 $39/35 $39/35 8 hrs $42/38 $42/38 $42/38 *all clay classes add $5 ARENA Hourly Rate (as of Sept., 1995) $105.00 $100.00 $96.00 Open skating (Youth & Adult) $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 Skate Rental $1.50 $1.25 $1.25 Skate Sharpening $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 Season Tickets (eff. 10/1/95) Resident Family: first 2 members $60.00 $55.00 $50.00 each additional member $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 maximum (7 persons) $85.00 $80.00 $75.00 Resident Individual $50.00 $40.00 $40.00 Non - Resident Family: first 2 members $75.00 $70.00 $65.00 each additional member $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 maximum (7 persons) $100.00 $95.00 $90.0 Non - Resident Individual $60.00 $50.00 $501 Classes $55.00 $55.00 $50.OU 1995 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES 7ESCRIPTION 1995 1994 1993 Resident Family Bold, indicates an increase $18.00 $16.50 GUN RANGE $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 Pistol 1/2 hour $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 25 rounds trap $5.00 $4.75 $4.75 Building /hr $50.00 $50.00 $45.00 Daily rental $160.00 $154.50 $13.00 Firearm Safety $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 AQUATIC CENTER Season Tickets Resident Family $20.00 $18.00 $16.50 first 2 members $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 each additional member $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 maximum (8 members) $105.00 $105.00 $105.00 Resident Individual $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Non - Resident Family $15.00 $14.00 $13.00 first 2 members $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 each additional member $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 maximum (8 members) $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 Non - Resident Individual $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 Daily Admission $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Admission after 6 p.m. $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Aquatic Instruction $40.00 $40.00 $35.00 3OLF COURSE - Braemar Green Fees 18 hole - non patron $20.00 $18.00 $16.50 18 hole - patron $16.00 $15.00 $13.50 9 hole - non patron $11.00 $10.50 $9.75 9 hole - patron $9.00 $9.00 $8.25 Group Fees - 18 holes $27.00 $24.00 $22.00 Group Fees - 9 holes $15.00 $14.00 $13.00 Patron Cards Individual $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 Executive Course $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Computerized Handicaps Resident $15.00 $14.00 $14.00 Non - Resident $20.00 $19.00 $19.00 Lockers Men's 72" $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Men's 42" $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Ladies' 72" $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Club Storage $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Club Rental $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 Pull Carts $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Golf Cars 18 holes $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 9 holes $12.00 $11.00 $11.00 Group Car Fees $28.00 $28.00 $26.00 Group Golf Lessons Adult $56.00 $55.00 $53.00 Junior $28.00 $28.00 $26.00 DESCRIPTION EXECUTIVE COURSE - Braemar Adult - non -patron Adult - patron Junior - non patron Junior - patron Golf Cars - everyone Pull Carts Group Fees BRAEMAR ROOM Resident - wedding related Non - resident - wedding related Other events Concession Fees (an annual increase of 5 %, as a general rule) EXECUTIVE COURSE - Normandale Adult - non - patron Adult - patron Junior - non -patron Junior - patron Golf Cars - everyone Pull Carts Group Fees GOLF RANGE Large Bucket Small Bucket Warm -up Bucket GOLF DOME Large Bucket Senior Bucket Time Golf 1/2 hour Hourly field rental League EDINBOROUGH Daily Passes Season Passes Edina Family first 2 members each additional member maximum (7 members) Edina Individual 1995 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES 1995 Bold, indicates an increase 1994 1993 $8.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $4.00 $10.00 $9.00 $9.00 $1.75 $1.75 $1.75 $10.00 $9.00 $9.00 $600.00 $650.00 $250 -$650 $600.00 $600.00 $650.00 $650.00 $2504650 $2504650 $9.00 $8.00 not open $8.00 $7.00 not open $6.00 $6.00 not open $5.00 $5.00 not op $10.00 $9.00 not op. $1.75 $1.75 not open $10.00 $9.00 not open $5.00 $4.75 $4.50 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $5.25 $5.00 $5.00 $4.75 $4.75 $4.75 $7.75 $7.50 $7.50 $100.00 $95.00 $95.00 $675.00 ;,535.00 $525.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $195.00 $195.00 $195.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $270.00 $270.00 $270! $180.00 $180.00 $1801 1995 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES ')ESCRIPTION 1995 1994 1993 Category #1 Bold, indicates an increase Non Edina Family $17 /day +$12 1man setup/down $17 /day +$12 1man setup/down $17 /day +a12/man setup/dow first 2 members $215.00 $215.00 $215.00 each additional member $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 maximum n members) $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 Non Edina Individual $195.00 $195.00 $195.00 Towel Fee $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 Skate Rental $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 Building Rentals Commercial Use (Trade Shows) $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Category #1 City of Edina & Boards/Assoc. May -Oct $17 /day +$12 1man setup/down $17 /day +$12 1man setup/down $17 /day +a12/man setup/dow Category #2 (per hour) $5.00 na na Edina Civic & Edina Schools (M -Th) $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Great Hall $150.00 $150.00 $125.00 Theatre $75.00 $75.00 $50.00 Grotto $50.00 $50.00 $25.00 Category #3- General Fees(per hour) $125.00 $125.00 $100.00 Great Hall $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 Grotto $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 Theatre $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 Category #4 Non -Edina Residents and Business (per hour) Eliminate Category #5- Exclusive Rentals Friday Evening $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 Saturday Evening $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Rental Amenities banners $100.00 $75.00 $75.00 use of rink area $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 cover ice area $325.00 Domestic Photo Shoot (hourly) any park area blocked off $50.00 $50.00 na Grotto $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Theatre $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 Great Hall $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 Ice Rink $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Commercial Photo Shoot (hourly) any park area blocked off $200.00 $200.00 $150.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 $150.00 Theatre $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 Ice Rink $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES Rental Concession items Paddle Boats 2 -person boat/ 1/2 hr $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 4- person boat/ 1/2 hr $5.00 na na Winter sled/ 1/2 hr $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Ice Skates $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 Building Rental Monday - Thursday 112 day - 1/2 room $125.00 $125.00 $100.00 1995 PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES DESCRIPTION 1995 1994 1993 Bold, indicates an increase $100.00 $100.00 1/2 day - full room $250.00 $250.00 $200.0 full day - 1/2 room $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 full day - full room $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 Friday Evening (6pm -10pm) associations/field/day (incl. overhead) $150.00 $100.00 1/2 evening - 1/2 room $200.00 na na 1/2 evening - full room $400.00 na na Weekend Rental Full Evening (6pm - lam) per hour /field $35.00 $35.00 Friday Evening $600.00 $600.00 $500.00 Saturday Evening $600.00 $600.00 $500.00 Sunday Rentals per day; incl. formal gardenstgazebo $125.00 $125.00 1/2 room - 4hr increments after 2pm $200.00 na na full room - 4hr increments after 2pm $400.00 na na PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS General Park Areas: commerical use (i.e. T.V.) /hour $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 commerical use with lights/hour $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Picnic Shelter /dav - Cornelia $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 Showmobile /day $700.00 $700.00 $700.00 Athletic Fields: baseball, soccer, football associations/field/day (incl. overhead) $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 residents & non - residents per day /field plus expenses $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 per hour /field $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 per hour /field with lights $55.00 $55.00 $55.0P Arenson Acres Terrace Room per day; incl. formal gardenstgazebo $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 per hour, first hour $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 each additional hour up to 4 hrs $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Tupa Park: Cahill School & Grange Hall per day $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 per hour, first hour $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 each additional hour, up to 4 hrs $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 VanValkenburg & Courtney Fields Edina Athletic Associations per day, includes building $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Edina Based Organizations per-day, plus labor & materials $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 per day for building rental $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Edina Athletic Associations field user fee /participant $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 Edina Hockey Association outdoor hockey rink fee /participant $6.00 na na RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1995 BE IT RESOLVED that the.Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service fees for 1995: AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facility: Level I - On Scene Treatment Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved Level II - Minor Care (BLS) Vital Signs Splinting Bandaging, etc. Level III - Moderate Care (ALS) I.V. Setups EKG. Monitoring Spine Immobilization $ 160.00 $ 355.00 $ 435.00 Level IV - Major Care $ 500.00 Level III plus any: Medications MAST (inflated) Additional Manpower Mechanical Extrication Level V - Cardiac Arrest Level IV plus any: Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Defibrillation Oxygen Administration $ 610.00 $ 25.00 Mileage From Scene to Hospital $ 7.00 /mile RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 1995 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following miscellaneous fees for 1995: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/SPHI S RESPONSE Engine/Fire Company HazMat Unit Specialized Personnel Specialized Equipment Supplies Disposal Other City Resources $170.00 per hour/2 hour minimum $340.00 per hour $ 55.00 per hour/2 hour minimum Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge t COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $367.44 A LAPOINTE SIGN INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 005873 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 7483 150893 $367.44* 12/05/94 $600.00 ABCO PORTABLE SANDBLAS PAINT POLES 111194 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 6919 150894 $600.00* 12/05/94 $217.83 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 14586445 ED BUILDING & ALARM SERVICE 12/05/94 $98.15 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 14586442 CENTENNIAL LAK ALARM SERVICE 150895 $315.98* 12/05/94 $317.93 ADVANCE LIGHTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 62610 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 6475 150896 $317.93* 12/05/94 $60.00. AFEM FINANCIAL OFFICE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 9403555 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI 150897 $60.00* 12/05/94 $110.61 AIM ELECTRONICS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 13071 ATHLETIC ACTIV PROF SERVICES 7361 150898 $110.61* 12/05/94 $69.23 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE RENTAL EQUIPMENT 22641494 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 150899 $69.23* 12/05/94 $277.97 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 23359 POOL TRACK GRE PRINTING 7191 150900 $277.97* 12/05/94 $1,225.00 ALSTAD, MARIAN AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150901 $1,225.00* 12/05/94 $213.00 AME GROUP BLACKTOP 166768 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 4843 150902 $213.00* 12/05/94 $57.73 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4140485 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7090 15.0903 $57.73* 12/05/94 $197.69 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 111594 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 150904 $197.69* 12/05/94 $1,139.72 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER 83507801 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 7355 .150905 $1,139.72* 12/05/94 $145.70 ANN'S TOOL SUPPLY TOOLS 9316 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 6719 150906 $145.70* 12/05/94 $96.25 APPOLLO COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40739 .FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 150907 $96.25* 12/05/94 $362.07 AQUA ENGINEERING SPRINKLER REPAIR 011444 SIDEWALK CIP 7236 150908 $362.07* 12/05/94 $75.00 ARMENIAN DANCE ENSEMBL SERVICES CL /EB 120494 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - -- INVOICE - - - - - - PROGRAM OBJECT ---- - - - -PO -NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 150909 $75.00* 12/05/94 $416.50 ARTISTIC FLOORS NEW KITCHEN FLOOR 111894 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES 150910 $416.50* 12/05/94 $206.79 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. TOOLS REPAIR PARTS B98633A B99297 TREES & MAINTE EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS REPAIR PARTS 6905 7063 12/05/94 12/05/94 $109.98 $146.28 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. ACCESSORIES B99297A EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7063 150911 $463.05* 12/05/94 $201.00 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD F 72758 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 6114 150912 $201.00* 12/05/94 $9.81 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS T16198 T16294 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 7266 7335 12/05/94 12/05/94 $103.77 $78.63 ASTLEFORD INTL ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS T15996 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7318 150913 $192.21* 12/05/94 $724.20 AVR INC FILL MATERIALS 24704 24704 GENERAL STORM PW BUILDING FILL MATERIALS REPAIR PARTS 12/05/94 $232.21 AVR INC REPAIR PARTS 150914 $956.41* 12/05/94 $72.00 AWWA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 112194 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI 150915 $72.00* 12/05/94 $72.00 AWWA DUES /PUBLIC WORKS 112194 DISTRIBUTION DUES & SUBSCRI 15093 -6 $72.00* 12/05/94 $13.66 AXT, LYLE COST OF GOODS SOLD F 111594 GUN RANGE CST OF GD FOOD 150917 $13.66* 12/05/94 $120.00 BAKER, MARY ANN REIMBURSEMENT 112994 ATHLETIC ACTIV PROP SERVICES 150918 $120.00* 12/05/94 $576.10 BARR-ENGINEERING COMPA PROF ENG SERVICES 23273541 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES 150919 $576.10* 12/05/94 $2,046.00 BARRETT MOVING AND STO DELIVERING VOTING EQ 23084 ELECTION PROF SERVICES 150920 $2,046.00* 12/05/94 $2.85 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 340129. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6565 6565 12/05/94 $2.47 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 340157. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7068 12/05/94 $108.89 BAUER BUILT INC REPAIR PARTS 341642 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 12/05/94 $701.14 BAUER BUILT INC ACCESSORIES 341714 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 6660 6660 12/05/94 $467.43 BAUER BUILT INC ACCESSORIES 338946 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 150921 $1,282.78* 12/05/94 $410.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION PAPER SUPPLIES GOODS SOLD M 206360 206360 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 12/05/94 $48.18 $539.77 BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD M 206375 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX I F COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $76.21 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 64552 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $249.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 206376 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $67.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 64555 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $38.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 64553 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $94.80 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 1024 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $144.95 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 206617 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $71.21 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 64802 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 150922 $1,740.67* 12/05/94 $771.00 BENN, BRADLEY AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150923 $77,1.00* 12/05/94 $553.90 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/05/94 $686.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/05/94 $30.60 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/05/94 $10.20 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/05/94 $401.60 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/05/94 $61.80 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 112594/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 150924 $1,744.40* 12/05/94 $35.78 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2056680 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 7354 12/05/94 $5.45 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2056681 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 7354 12/05/94 $19.37 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2041730 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 7234 12/05/94 $19.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2045880 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 7288 150925 $79.77* 12/05/94 $234.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS 0 REPAIR PARTS 10729 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 7054 12/05/94 $285.42 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS 0 REPAIR PARTS 10865 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 7131 150926 $519.42* 12/05/94 $128.40 BEST MAID COOKIE COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 0658 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 6113 150927 $128.40* 12/05/94 $333.00 BEST WEDDINGS MAGAZINE ADVERTISING /CL /EB 112994 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 150928 $333.00* 12/05/94 $38,711.24 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING L 94100700 RECYCLING EQUIP RENTAL 150929 $38,711.24* 12/05/94 $14.88 BIG RIVER BAKERY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 21348 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 5741 150930 $14.88* 12/05/94 $50.00 BINGHAM, DORAINE SERVICES CL /EB 122994 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150931 $50.00* 12/05/94 $75.00 BLOOMINGTON•MEDALIST B SERVICES CL /EB 121194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150932 $75.00* 12/05/94 $15.00 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 120733 . POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI 150933 $15.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT - -- - - - - -- - - - -- VENDOR-- - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT --------PO-NUM_- -------------------- 12/05/94 $12.00 BOB STEIN BEER SYSTEMS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 1261 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 7226 150934 $12.00* 12/05/94 $9.27 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 360984 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7237 12/05/94 $761.46 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 354483 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6889 150935 $770.73* 12/05/94 $37.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CONCRETE TESTING 053903 SIDEWALK CIP 12/05/94 $187.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CONCRETE TESTING 053879 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 150936 $225.00* 12/05/94 $75.00 BROM, BECKY SERVICES CL /EB 121194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150937 $75.00* 12/05/94 $231.00 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 16292 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR PARTS 7324 150938 $231.00* 12/05/94 $51,784.88 BRW INC. PROF ENG SERVICES 04073 STREET IMPROVE CIP 150939 $51,784.88* 12/05/94 $65.94 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451180 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 - $15.47 BUILDERS SQUARE CREDIT ON ACCOUNT CREDIT CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $116.46 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451180 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $39.62 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451181 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7301 150940 $206.55* 12/05/94 $31.37 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRA SAFETY CALENDAR 68810158 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7431 150941 $31.37* 12/05/94 $43.32 C.F. ANDERSON CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 39299400 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 7425 150942 $43.32* 12/05/94 $253.13 CADY COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 114821 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 7446 12/05/94 $440.91 CADY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 114569 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 150943 $694.04* 12/05/94 $76.73 CAMPION CATERING ECA MEETING 27850 COMMUNICATIONS MEETING EXPENS 7297 150944 $76.73* 12/05/94 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112994 FINANCE MILEAGE 150945 $50.00* 12/05/94 $79.00 CAREER TRACK PUBLICATI CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 00605318 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS 150946 $79.00* 12/05/94 $244.11 CASWELL INTERNL CORP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30396 GUN RANGE CONTR REPAIRS 7444 150947 $244.11* 12/05/94 $71.01 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 361261 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7269 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $26.84 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 361351 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7273 150948 $97.85* 12/05/94 $129.69 CELLULAR ONE PHONE CHARGES 111494/P GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7326 12/05/94 $86.69 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 111494/E ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $141.55 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 110994 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $88.32 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 112194/W SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7373 12/05/94 $7.64 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 112194/P INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $10.74 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 1121 PATROL TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $617.60 CELLULAR ONE CELLUALR PHONE 112194/P PATROL TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $77.27 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 1121 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $103.96 CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 112194/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 12/05/94 $39.29 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 1121 PATROL TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $207.11 CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 112194/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 150949 $1,509.86* 12/05/94 $297.14 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30666 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7176 150950 $297.14* 12/05/94 $91.93 CITY OF EDINA WATER 1104 GC CIP CIP 12/05/94 $222.75 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 110494 FIRE DEPT. GEN SEWER & WATER 12/05/94 $24.32 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 110494 CENTENNIAL LAK SEWER & WATER 12/05/94 $9.83 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 110494 BUILDING MAINT SEWER & WATER 12/05/94 $38.35 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 110494 BUILDING MAINT SEWER & WATER 150951 $387.18* 12/05/94 $50.00 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ELECTION TRAINING VI 112994 ELECTION PRINTING 150952 $50.00* 12/05/94 $35.38 CLARK, KELLY MILEAGE /WATER DEPART 111794 METER READING MILEAGE 150953 $35.38* 12/05/94 $75.00 CLELAND, BRUCE SERVIES CL /EB 121194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150954 $75.00* 12/05/94 $83.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 02752813 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $265.10 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 02763745 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $306.95 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 02764503 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $74.20. COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 02824455 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 150955 $730.00* 12/05/94 $1,118.76 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP PROF ENG SERVICES 125859 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 150956 $1,118.76* 12/05/94 $187.43 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVI AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT 111594 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 7426 150957 $187.43* 12/05/94 $152.61 CONSTRUCTION FASTENING GENERAL SUPPLIES 21281 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6828 150958 $152.61* . COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTIONINVOICE ---- - - -- - - - - -- PROGRAM - - - -- OBJECT -- ------ PO -NUM_- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 12/05/94 $143.50 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO COST OF GOODS SOLD F 015242 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 6456 150959 $143.50* 12/05/94 $38.75 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 0397490 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 6689 i 12/05/94 $58.49 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 0397208 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7296 150960 $97.24* 12/05/94 $450.00 CUMMINS DIESEL SALES I SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 1127112 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 150961 $450.00* 12/05/94 $411.59 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 4704702 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 7165 12/05/94 $54.29 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 4626709 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7005 150962 $465.88* 12/05/94 $12.43 DAEHN, MARCELLA GENERAL SUPPLIES 112894 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $67.86 DAEHN, MARCELLA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112894 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE 12/05/94 $7.00 DAEHN, MARCELLA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112894 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE 150963 $87.29* 12/05/94 $190.00 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPM HOSE 168827 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 7430 150964 $190.00* 12/05/94 $266.85 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 9827 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7069 12/05/94 $116.64 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 9834 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7132 150965 $383.49* 12/05/94 $300.00 DEANS, DOUG EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 111794 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 6706 150966 $300.00* 12/05/94 $3,153.05 DELTA DENTAL HOSPITALIZATION 32350 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 150967 $3,153.05* 12/05/94 $1,080.00 DICKER, TOBIE AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/05/94 $108.00 DICKER, TOBIE PART TIME MAINT /ART 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150968 $1,188.00* 12/05/94 $256.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150969 $256.00* 12/05/94 $872.07 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 17621 EQUIPMENT OPER-RADIO SERVICE 12/05/94 $46.28 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 17748 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 7331 12/05/94 $108.00 DISPATCH COMM /MN RADIO SERVICE 17680 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 7320 150970 $1,026.35* 12/05/94 $16,898.61 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 389106 LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA 150971 $16,898.61* 12/05/94 $35.14 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 137614 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 6963 150972 $35.14* I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $3,433.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 443784 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $4;249.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 443223 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $2,703.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 443221 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $39.75 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 443221 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $119.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 434321 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $2,159.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 446356 YORK SELLING CST OF.GDS BEE 12/05/94 $1,524.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 446711 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $218.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 446726 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $395.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 446364 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 150973 $14,841.80* 12/05/94 $20.90 ECONOMIC PRESS DUES & S'UBSCRIPTIONS 42620021 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI 150974 $20.90* 12/05/94 $41.54 ECOWATER SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 111594 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 150975 $41.54* 12/05/94 $54.93 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE QUATTRO PRO 14164251 FINANCE. EQUIP REPLACEM 7103 150976 $54.93* 12/05/94 $300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES DECEMBER CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 150977 $3,00.00* 12/05/94 $280.00 FARBER, DIANE AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/05/94 $86.40 FARBER, DIANE CRAFT SUPPLIES 112894 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 12/05/94 $61.00 FARBER, DIANE PART TIME MAINT/ ART 112894 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES 150978 $427.40* 12/05/94 $222.10 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPP 49267 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 3516 12/05/94 $365.00 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREATMENT SUPP 19799. WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 150979 $587.10* 12/05/94 $30.00 FEMLING, FRANK GENERAL SUPPLIES 44703 GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI .12/05/94 $30.00 FEMLING, FRANK COURSE BEAUTIFICATIO 44703 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 150980 $60.00* 12/05/94 $30.00 FINE, AGNES SERVICES CL /EB 121894 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150981 $30.00* 12/05/94 $843.00 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISE FENCING 940439 GUN RANGE CONTR REPAIRS 7035 150982 $843.00* 12/05/94 $450.00 FOUR SEASON SILK PLANT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 3850 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 150983 $450:00* 12/05/94 $75.00 FRAGALE, ANN$TTE SERVICES CL /EB 121394 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150984 $75.00* 12/05/94 $480.00 FRAME, SUSAN AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/05/94 $39.25 FRAME, SUSAN COST OF COMMODITIES 112894 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT ---- - - - -PO -NUM. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150985 $519.25* 12/05/94 $200.00 FRANSSELL, CATHERINE AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF - SERVICES 12/05/94 $125.00 FRANSSELL, CATHERINE CRAFT SUPPLIES 112894 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 1.50986 $325.00* 12/05/94 $540.00 G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 112594 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 150987 $540.00* 12/05/94 $100.00 GAGLTARDIE, CELESTE PROFESSIONAL SVC - 0 111894 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 150988 $100.00 12/05/94 $285..:'. GALI R'S SERVICFS F RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 PW BUILDING' RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $ ?.i1.Zi GAL' .'S SERVTCl3;=s I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 :' -i0. GAL! S SERI:'.''r. I RUBBISH REMOVAI. 112894 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 ` ?26.56 GALI S SEN " ' ?S I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $255.06 GAL' 3 SI- ``'.'- " -_'.� I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $49.16 GAI 3 SI:: . I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $132.01 t- :S GAI' 3 �" I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $613.57 ..,- GALI 3 �,r., S I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $100.26 GALI S f "=' ;,.:ES I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $68.28 GALI S i. . ". iES I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA 12/05/94 $285.04 GALI S :' CES I RUBBISH REMOVAL 112894 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 150989 $2,882.43* 12/05/94 $562.00 GAN7 ST IN" COST OF GOODS SOLD B 185026 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 150990 $562.00* 12/05/94 $296.00 GARDEl;. - -)UG AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150991 $296.00* 12/05/94 $50.02 GARVEN GREETINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD M 101976 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 150992 $50.02* 12/05/94 $375.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150993 $375.00* 12/05/94 $50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVIC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 941116 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 150994 $50.00* 12/05/94 $168.00 GLEWWE, LINDA AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150995 $168.00* 12/05/94 $210.00 GOLFCRAFT GENERAL SUPPLIES 4038 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 7447 150996 $210.00* 12/05/94 $220.08 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49606942 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7314 12/05/94 $212.37 . GRAINGER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 49525077 METER REPAIR EQUIP MAINT 7085 , 12/05/94 $91.39 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49606759 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6994 12/05/94 $104.75 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49525129 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7089 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150997 $628.59* 12/05/94 $192.00 GRAPP, JEAN AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150998 $192.00* 12/05/94 $161.00 GRAY, CAROL AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 150999 $161.00* 12/05/94 $270.00 GREEN, DICK AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151000 $270.00* 12/05/94 $212.95 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 20582 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 6662 12/05/94 $185.14 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 20497 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 6410 151001 $398.09* 12/05/94 $424.24 H.L. MOORE EMS SUPPLIES 7912325 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 7424 151002 $424.24* 12/05/94 $742.31 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY GASOLINE 270743 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 3523 151003 $742.31* 12/05/94 $25.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES CL /EB 122094 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151004 $25.00* 12/05/94 $60.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES CL /EB 121194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151005 $60.00* 12/05/94 $184.32 HARMON GLASS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 72002457 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7336 151006 $184.32* 12/05/94 $480.00 HAYWA, PHYLLIS AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151007 $480.00* 12/05/94 $624.00 HEIM, HARRY AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151008 $624.00* 12/05/94 $202.21 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 9527 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 5742 151009 $202.21* 12/05/94 $224.39 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICA PERSONAL SERVICES 3746 FIRE DEPT. GEN PERS SERVICES 2151 151010 - $224.39* 12/05/94 $1,126.74 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 112394 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM -PRISO 151011 $1,126.74* 12/05/94 $2,028.83 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU GENERAL ELECTION BAL 112294 ELECTION PRINTING 151012 $2,028.83* 12/05/94 $8,932.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU WORKHOUSE /JAIL 002705 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO 151013 $8,932.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 10 CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -- - - - -PO NUM. 12/05/94 $426.11 HOFFER'S INC REPAIR PARTS 18730700 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR PARTS 6964 151014 $426.11* 12/05/94 $564.97 HOFFMAN, FRANCIS CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 112994 SUPERV. & OVRH CONF & SCHOOLS 711015 $564.97* 12/05/94 $13.98 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33096 SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $67.61 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33094 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 151016 $81.59* 12/05/94 $836.OQ HONEYWELL INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 392PTS15 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 6341 151017 $836• * 12/05/94 $75.n0 HOPKINS HIGH SCHOOL CH SERVICES CL /EB 1: 194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151018 $75.00* 12/05/94 $125.99 HORIZO "' CHEMICAL CO IN CHEMIC%'- 1484 POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 7215 151019 $125.99* 12/05/94 $45.45 ICMA BOOKF MPHLETS A77089 t. "•'fNISTRATION '300 KS & PAMPHL 7098 151020 $45.45* 12/05/94 $296.20 INTERNATIONAL CONFEREN BOOKS MPHLETS C15808 INSPECTIONS BOOKS & PAMPHL 151021 $296.20* 12/05/94 $74.10 INTERSTATE.DETROIT DIE REPA '.TS 193887 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7159 1.51022 $74.10* 12/05/94 $390.00 IUOE LOCAL 49 CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 111594 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 151023 $390.00* 12/05/94 $581.29 JAMES & COMPANY INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 66850 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 5427 151024 $581.29* 12/05/94 $592.32 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING E3326 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 7233 151025 $592.32* 12/05/94 $471.50 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 4081 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 7172 151026 $471.50* 12/05/94 $26.32 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 112894 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $72.52 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 112894 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 12/05/94 $34.14 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 112894 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 151027 $132.98* 12/05/94 $487.02 JORDANO ASSOCIATES LTD REPAIR PARTS 0009386, CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 151028 $487.02* 12/05/94 $76.09 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY FERTILIZER 60456 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER 7111 COUNCTL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151029 $76.09* 12/05/94 $117.13 JULIEN, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 112394 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $12.57 JULIEN, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 112394 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $27.64 JULIEN, DIANE GENERAL SUPPLIES. 112394 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $23.50 JULIEN, DIANE LICENSES & PERMITS 112394 ' EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 12/05/94 $10.75 JULIEN, DIANE REPAIR PARTS. 112394 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 151030 $191.59* 12/05/94 $518.70 KELLY SERVICES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ,45473808 ELECTION PROF SERVICES 151031 $518.70* 12/05/94 $78.14 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 129688 GENERAL STORM TOOLS 6965 12/05/94 $102.67 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 130341 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 6996 12/05/94 $51.23 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 129788 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6970 12/05/94 $128.77 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 131373 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7119 12/05/94 $178.69 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 131156 ART,CENTER-BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7119 12/05/94 $,16.28 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 130686 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7019 12/05/94 -$9.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 130935 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $9.99 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 130936 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7019 12/05/94 - $48.28 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 131372 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7119 12/05/94 $109.56 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 132984 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 6707 12/05/94 $85.10 KNOX COMM CREDIT CONTRACTED- REPAIRS 131078 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7188 151032 $702.18* 12/05/94 $227.95 KOALA BEAR KARE /JBJ IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 53026 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7200 151033 $227.95* 12/05/94 $180.00 KOCHENASH, RICK AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151034 $180.00* 12/05/94 $35.63 KOJETIN, BOB GENERAL SUPPLIES /ART 112894 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 151035 $35.63* 12/05/94 $177.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 153524 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $997.15 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 119389 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $30.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 119272 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $1,119.15 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 119272 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $2,092.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 119162 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $501.40 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 118740 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 151036 $4,918.60* 12/05/94 $58.58 LANCRETE, LAURA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112894 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 151037 $58.58* 12/05/94 $204.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1149278 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 6997 151038 $204.58* 12/05/94 $7.58 LINHOFF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIE 256813 PUBLIC HEALTH PHOTO SUPPLIES 12/05/94 $12.74 'LINHOFF SLIDES & POSTERS 257021 WORK. CAP. PRO ACCTS REC MISC COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT --------PO-NUM_- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151039 $20.32* 12/05/94 $26.40 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR1094 VERNON LIQUOR DATA PROCESSIN 12/05/94 $26.40 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR1094 LIQUOR YORK GE DATA PROCESSIN 12/05/94 $26.40 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR1094 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSIN 12/05/94 $1,050.76 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR1094 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN 12/05/94 $1,894.55 LOGIS DATA DATA PROCESSING PROCESSING AR1094 AR1094 ASSESSING FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN DATA PROCESSIN 12/05/94 12/05/94 $4,501.29 $1,125.40 LOGIS LOGIS FRAME RELAY AR1094 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 151040 $8,651.20* 12/05/94 $35.00 LUGER, ELLEN CLASS REFUND 112294 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 151041 $35.00* 12/05/94 $77.00 LUTZ, RICHARD M GENERAL SUPPLIES /POL 112894 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $24.00 LUTZ, RICHARD M CONT ED /POLICE 112894 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 151042 $101.00* 12/05/94 $264.97 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33150 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $133.68 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33382 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $233.94 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33378 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX MIX 12/05/94 $551.43 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33311 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS 12/05/94 $484.59 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33245 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $267.36 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33225 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 151043 $1,935.97* 12/05/94 $246.86 M.A.B. ENTERPRISES INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 52178 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 7428 151044 $246.86* 12/05/94 $77.50 MAHA ADVERTISING OTHER 093094 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 7222 151045 $77.50* 12/05/94 $45.00 MAKELA, BARB SERVICES CL /EB 121194 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151046 $45.00* 12/05/94 $350.00 MARGOLIS BROTHERS CO TREE MOVING 8220 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 6939 12/05/94 $1,278.00 MARGOLIS BROTHERS CO MOVE TREE 8221 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 7181 151047 $1,628.00* 12/05/94 $75.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 320430 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 - $80.00 MARK VII SALES OVER PAYMENT 111694 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $7.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 320432 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 - $116.45 MARK VII SALES. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 016621. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $3,085.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 320431 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $1,902.95 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 325212 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $8.15 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 324790 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $550.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 324788 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE $72.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 325211 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX ,12/05/94 12/05/94 $438.75 MARK VII SALES COST COST OF GOODS SOLD OF GOODS SOLD B B 324356 323201 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $7.05 MARK VII SALES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $137.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 324787 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $64.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 323195 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $1,212.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 323200 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $1,613.30 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 323196 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $29.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 323199 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $22.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 320130 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $56.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 320044 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $939.30 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 323198 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $63.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 323197 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $6.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 320043 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 - $10.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 315427. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $2,793.95 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 320042 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 151049 $12,879.70* 12/05/94 $144.95 MARSHALL & SWIFT GENERAL SUPPLIES 120594 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI 151050 $144.95* 12/05/94 $468.73 MCC /MIDWEST COST OF GOODS SOLD 97544 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7123 151051 $468.73* 12/05/94 $224.72 MCCAREN DESIGN TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 11735 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 6684 151052 $224.72* 12/05/94 $456.47 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 162844 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7088 151053 $456.47* 12/05/94 $8.07 MECO REPAIR PARTS 65375 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7134 12/05/94 $30.11 MECO REPAIR PARTS 65302 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6992 12/05/94 $372.75 MECO REPAIR PARTS 65442 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7256 151054 $410.93* 12/05/94 $63.35 MEDICAL DISPOSAL SYSTE HAZARDOUS WASTE CONT 8287 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 7427 151055 $63.35* 12/05/94 $80.51 MENARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 494012 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 7445 151056 $80.51* 12/05/94 $123.99 MENARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 447253 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 7209 151057 $123.99* 12/05/94 $267.95 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 37636 CENTENNIAL LAK CLEANING SUPPL 7366 12/05/94 $496.39 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 37609 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 7299 12/05/94 $205.11 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 37587 TANKS TOWERS & GENERAL SUPPLI 7245 12/05/94 $433.77 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 37579 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7292 12/05/94 $398.04 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 37552 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 7179 12/05/94 $436.11 MERIT SUPPLY' CLEANING SUPPLIES 37473 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 7096 151058 $2,237.37* 12/05/94 $438.00 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 4637 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 7039 12/05/94 $219.00 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 4795 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 7287 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK - AMOUNT --- - - - - -- VENDOR - - - -- -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM --------------- OBJECT ------- PO -NUM_- ----------- 151059 - - - - -- $657.00* 12/05/94, $77..50 METRO LEAGUE GIRLS' BA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 112394 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCRI 7481 151060 $77.50* 12/05/94 $255,213.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 110194 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR 151061 $255,213.00* 12/05/94 $1,200.00 MICHALKO, JIM BRIDGE INSPECTION 112994 PWKS ADMIN GEN PROF SERVICES 151062 $1,200.00* 12/05/94 $26.81 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 19840 STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 3515 12/05/94 $311.57 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 19840 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 12/05/94 $18.95 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 19840 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/05/94 $8.73 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 20036 STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 12/05/94 $234.99 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 20036 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 12/05/94 $45.47 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 20036 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3515 12/05/94 $77.55 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 19840 MAINT OF COURS SAND,GRVL & RO 151063 $724.07* 12/05/94 $95.77 MIDWEST SPORTS MARKETI GENERAL SUPPLIES 116802 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 7356 151064 $95.77* 12/05/94 $34.67 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL DEER ABATEMENT 97918 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 6824 12/05/94 $40.23 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL DEER ABATEMENT 98104 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 6980 151065 $74.90* 12/05/94 $373.00 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 1183132 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 7144 12/05/94 $384.73 MILLIPORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1185781 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 7166 151066 $757.73* 12/05/94 $52.47 MINN COMM PAGING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 22509611 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 151067 $52.47* 12/05/94 $26.04 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111594 NORMANDALE-GC HEAT 151068 $26.04* 12/05/94 $19.60 MINNESOTA CONWAY ACCESSORIES 209549 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7050 12/05/94 $257.32 MINNESOTA CONWAY ACCESSORIES 209545 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 6968 151069 $276.92* 12/05/94 $40.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 NOTARY COMMISSION RE 112894 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 151070 $40.00* 12/05/94 $20.00 MINNESOTA PARK & RECRE CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 111694 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS 151071 $20.00* 12/05/94 $73.66 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19412 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 7255 12/05/94 $179.53 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19366 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 7254 12/05/94 $226.65 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 19210 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 7242 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151072 $479.84* 12/05/94 $53.28 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT BID AD DISTRIBUTOR 14106 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/05/94 $48.96 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT BID AD ROTARY MOWER 14104 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/05/94 $43.20 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT AD TREE TRIMMING 14105 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/05/94 $15.36 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT HRG COMP PLAN 14160 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 151073 $160.80* 12/05/94 $499.49 MINNESOTA WANNER GENERAL SUPPLIES 0023784 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7120 151074 $499.49* 12/05/94 $148.04 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY SERVICES 1379329 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 7334 151075 $148.04* 12/05/94 $760.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLIES 47642 TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLI 151076 $760.00* 12/05/94 $4,359.68 MPLS FINANCE DEPARTMEN WATER PURCHASED 111594 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE 151077 $4,359.68* 12/05/94 $6,887.90 MTS NW SOUND PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTE 310232 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 5891 151-078 $6,887.90* 12/05/94 $421.21 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR PARTS 6011 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7180 151079 $421.21* 12/05/94 $43.00 MUZAK ADVERTISING OTHER 120194/5 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 12/05/94 $57.48 MUZAK DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 120194/C ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 151080 $100.48* 12/05/94 $47.00 N.A.D.A. USED CAR GUIDE 37231014 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7315 151081 $47.00* 12/05/94 $476.30 NAME BRAND SPORTS UNIFORM 7352 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 151082 $476.30* 12/05/94 $421.57 NASCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 53251 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 7164 151083 $421.57* 12/05/94 $420.00 NATIONAL BUSINESS FINA ADVERTISING OTHER 11219 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 12/05/94 $4,250.00 NATIONAL BUSINESS FINA ADVERTISING OTHER 11218 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 151084 $4,670.00* 12/05/94 $70.00 NATIONAL ENV. HEALTH A 1995 DUES 112894 PUBLIC HEALTH DUES & SUBSCRI 151085 $70.00* 12/05/94 $202.25 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F 338215 CLUB HOUSE CST OF GD FOOD 7449 12/05/94 $118.16 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 337894 ARENA•CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 6115 151086. $320.41* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - INVOICE - -- PROGRAM ----------------------------------- ------ OBJECT - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12/05/94 12/05/94 $95.59 NELSON RADIO COMMUNICA ACCESSORIES 16905 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7332 151087 $95.59* 12/05/94 $52.90 NELSON, DAVID SUPPLIES /POLICE 111594 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 151088 $52.90* 12/05/94 $336.00 NELSON, J THOMAS AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151089 $336.00* 12/05/94 $2,770.89 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO SALT 839229. SNOW ,& ICE REM SALT 151090 $2,770.89* j 12/05/94 $125.00 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 111494 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 151091 $125.00* 12/05/94 $45.90 NORTHEAST METRO INTERM CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 15363 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 151092 $45.90* 12/05/94 $74.71 NORTHERN AIRGAS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 82054 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 2617 151093 $74.71* 12/05/94 $3,630.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER PROF ENG SERVICES M02809 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $870.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER PROF ENG SERVICES M02808 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 151094 $4,500.00* 12/05/94 $74.40 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 48066 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $126.96 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 48067 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $18.60 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 48061 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $55.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 47907 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $10.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 46502. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $162.60. NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF, GOODS SOLD M 47249 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS. MIX 151095 $449.16* 12/05/94 $231.96 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD 225373 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7121 12/05/94 $31.01 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD 225520 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7124 151096 $262.97* 12/05/94 $131.46 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW15869 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7133 12/05/94 $137.75 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW15922 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 7150 12/05/94 $106.04 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW16063 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7249 12/05/94 $265.63 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW16064 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 7156 12/05/94 $33.04 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW16062 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7248 12/05/94 $94.32 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW15923 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7135 12/05/94 $223.31 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW15752 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 6967 12/05/94 $389.58 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW15858 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES &TUBES 7311 151097 $1,381.13 *. 12/05/94 $75.00 NRA DUES /GUN RANGE, 112394 GUN RANGE ADMI DUES & SUBSCRI , 151098 $75.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $3.14 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $6.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $2,519.35 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $30.49 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $17.14 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $6.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 12/05/94 $6.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 121594 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 151099 $2,588.96* 12/05/94 $497.56 O.B. OF MINNEAPOLIS IN REPAIR PARTS 13980 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 4120 151100 $497.56* 12/05/94 $135.79 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 64639 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 6969 151101 $135.79* 12/05/94 $50.92 OLSEN, RONALD REFUND OVRPYMT WATER 111694 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. 151102 $50.92* 12/05/94 $308.32 ORDER UP CONT ED /POLICE 112894 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 151103 $308.32* 12/05/94 $92.10 OZARK ART AND CRAFT COST OF GOODS SOLD 057357 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7125 151104 $92.10* 12/05/94 $76.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL HEARING TEST 112094 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 12/05/94 $40.40 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL HEPATITIS B SHOT 112094 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 12/05/94 $66.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSI 112094 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 151105 $182.40* 12/05/94 $256.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $61.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45841 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $365.40 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45590 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $152.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45601 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $18.25 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 45602 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $256.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45589 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $60.60 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45699 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 151106 $1,169.75* 12/05/94 $71.92 PBE REPAIR PARTS A717578 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7322 12/05/94 $106.32 PBE ACCESSORIES A718239 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7319 151107 $178.24* 12/05/94 $260.50 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 45301107 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 6112 12/05/94 - $34.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 093094 /A ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 12/05/94 $149.70 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 45493410 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $72.20 PEPSI COLA•BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 45493208 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $70.25 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 44293411 VERNON SELLING CST OF.GDS MIX 151108 $518.65* 12/05/94 $20.00 PETERSON, DAVID SERVICES CL /EB 112994 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 19 "1 -LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI Page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ---------7--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151109 REFRIGERATION $20.00* 095987 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 7448 R.C. IDENTIFICATION IN 12/05/94 $34.08 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 801708 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI REM '1110 GENERAL $34.08* 7208 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7443 REM SUPPLIES 12/05/94 $225.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /SENIOR CENTE 110194 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE RESCUE 1.51111 CONTRACTED REPAIRS $225.00* 5142 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS RESCUE SYSTEMS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 12/05/94 $75.00 POSTMASTER BULK MAILING FEE #00 112894 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE COST OF 151112 B $75.00* YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 12/05/94 $287.55 I' "' "IE ii; "ITIPMENT COMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 17494 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 6i z :.'k. 151113 B $287.55* 50TH ST SELLIN CST.OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 12/05/94 $465.9 -1 IS'::+ +'TURF /CHEM PLANTINGS & TREES 005447 RANGE PLANT & TREES 6942 GOODS SOLD 12/05/94 $1,118 `?URF /CHEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 005461 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 7348 15.1114 B 111351 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 12/05/94 r' PRF;f`:. -' rLEET SERVICE`' CONTRACTED REPAIRS 82A EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7174 GOODS SOLD 12/05/94 $? PRE" fiLEET SERVICE' ,ERV BODY q9 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 6037 151115 ,9* 12/05/94 151116 12/05/94 12/05/94 151117 ].2/05/94 151118 12/05/94 12/05/94 151119 12/05/94 151120 12/05/94 151121 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 12/05/94 i I .48 ,47.48* $60.00 $193.50 $253.50* $5.35 $5.35* $485.64 $472.86 $958.50* $275.00 $275.00* $281.50 $281.50* $186.00 $4,446.31 $638.30 $2,090.50 $1,091.35 $3,141.58 $267.00 $2,658.60 QUP-1 .'Y FLOW SYSTEMS ENERAL SUPPLIES 19 "1 -LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 7340 QUALITY REFRIGERATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 095896 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 7225 QUALITY REFRIGERATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 095987 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 7448 R.C. IDENTIFICATION IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 018240 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7208 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7443 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 80002 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7293 RESCUE ONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5142 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS RESCUE SYSTEMS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 15323 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5187 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 111417 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 111349 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 112158 50TH ST SELLIN CST.OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 112159 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 112157 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE REX DI.S.TRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 111351 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD M 112062 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 111353 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $115.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 110686 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 151122 $14,634.64* 12/05/94 $150.00 RIEKENA, JOE SERVICES /GOLF COURSE 111694 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 151123 $150.00* 12/05/94 $17.33 RITZ CAMERA GENERAL SUPPLIES 3750905 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 7057 151124 $17.33* 12/05/94 $476.00 ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 149365 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 6702 151125 $476.00* 12/05/94 $426.00 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 59394 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 7300 12/05/94 $86.63 ROBERT B. HILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 103194 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7202 151126 $512.63* 12/05/94 $6,575.60 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 32901 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 12/05/94 $74.92 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 32893 RANGE GASOLINE 2497 151127 $6,650.52* 12/05/94 $267.00 RUDQUIST, MONICA AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151128 $267.00* 12/05/94 $147.00 RYTER, TZAPORAH AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151129 $147.00* 12/05/94 $185.00 SALUD AMERICA COST OF GOODS SOLD B 11121 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 151130 $185.00* 12/05/94 $70.44 SAX ARTS & CRAFTS CRAFT SUPPLIES 06555272 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 7021 12/05/94 $133.85 SAX ARTS & CRAFTS COST OF GOODS SOLD 06555272 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF-GD FOOD 151131 $204.29* 12/05/94 $90.00 SCHATTAUER, JIM PROFESSIONAL SVC - O 121594 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151132 $90.00* 12/05/94 $24.00 SCHWARTZ, S.A. CONT ED /POLICE 112894 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 151133 $24.00* 12/05/94 $297.00 SEMINAR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 110494 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 7095 151134 $297.00* 12/05/94 $75.00 SKUDLAREK, MARK AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151135 $75.00* 12/05/94 $170.00 SKYLINE ENGINEERING IN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 13991 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 151136 $170.00* .12/05/94 $200.00 SMITH, CORY y SERVICES GOLF COURSE 111694 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 151137 $200.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 "23:41:38 Page 20 CHECK NO ------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT -- -- VENDOR - -- - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - -- - -- INVOICE- - PROGRAM - - -- - - - - -- OBJECT --------PO-NUM_- 12/05/94 $937.38 SOUND ADVISE CONSULTIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 111994 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7349 151138 $937.38* 12/05/94 $105.80 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU BID AD- LOADER CPC03518 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/05/94 $218.50 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU BID ADS -MOWER & DIST CPC03501 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 151139 $324.30* 12/05/94 $2,577.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 36419 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $1,747.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 41676 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $62.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 41676 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/05/94 $937.45 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 41833 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $3,195.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTP'" TORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 41674 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 151140 $8,521.25'. 12/05/94 $100.00 :,PARKS, JIM SERVICES CL /EB 121594- ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151141 $100.0t; - 12/05/94 $29.`:' =. B=PS TOOLS 2278944 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 6914 12/05/94 $99 "5"-1 "?PS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2215515 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 6933 151142 $129 12/05/94 $11) STATE OF MINNI: PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 182104 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 151143 $1` 12/05/94 $191 " °r STATE OF MINNE:.,FA MINNESOTA STATUTES 112894 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 151144 12/05/94 $393.94 STREICHERS ACCESSORIES 999111 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7267 12/05/94 $84.67 STREICHERS REPAIR PARTS 994831 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7321 12/05/94 $455.29 STREICHERS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 100901 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 7362 151145 $933.90* 12/05/94, $19.41 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 213163 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7307 151146 $19.41* 12/05/94 $381.34 SUBURBAN PROPANE GASOLINE 111794 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 151147 $381.34* 12/05/94 $160.85 SUN ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 41104003 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 6874 12/05/94 $198.79 SUN ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 41104003 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 6874 151148 $359.64* 12/05/94 $24.18 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 111594 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 7333 151149 $24.18* 12/05/94 $145.40 SWEETHEART CUP COST OF GOODS SOLD F 112294 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 151150 $145.40* 12/05/94 $105.91 TARGET PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIE 33993 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES 7479 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/05/94 $22.76 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 86982 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 151151 $128.67* 12/05/94 $5.35 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CE GENERAL SUPPLIES N4143 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 7313 151152 $5.35* 12/05/94 $37.00 TELL, LINDA CLASS REFUND 112294 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 151153 $37.00* 12/05/94 $484.08 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO ACCESSORIES 78885 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 6909 151154 $484.08* 12/05/94 $919.07 THE CAMPBELL GROUP UNIFORMS 9892 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 6948 151155 $919.07* 12/05/94 $59.11 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 5928454 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 151156 $59.11* 12/05/94 $36.39 THE LITTLE BLIND SPOT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4192 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS 7221 151157 $36.39 *. 12/05/94 $216.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1033. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $335.30 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1072 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $172.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1066 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $361.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1070 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $544.80 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 776 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $613.70 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 11452 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $701.20 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 778 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $630.30 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 777 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 151158 $3,574.30* 12/05/94 $75.00 THOMPSON, FREDRIKA SERVICES CL /EB 120894 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151159 $75.00* 12/05/94 $3,127.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 45960 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $4.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 46452 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $2,375.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 46452 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $1,670.70 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 45535. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/05/94 $51.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 45585 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 151160 $7,228.25* 12/05/94 $245.61 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP WELDING SUPPLIES 293805 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 7076 12/05/94 $4.41 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP WELDING SUPPLIES 293425 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 7087 151161 $250.02* 12/05/94 $65.80 TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 86628 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI.6943 12/05/94 $258.80 TOOLS BY OLSEN TOOLS 86629 MAINT OF COURS.TOOLS 7204 151162 $324.60* 12/05/94 $25.00 TRETTEL, KATHY SERVICES CL /EB 122294 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - -- - PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 151163 $25.00* 12/05/94 $49.00 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 43675 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 7429 151164 $49.00* 12/05/94 $288.33 TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY IN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3414 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7478 151165 $288.33* 12/05/94 $4.60 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 9179 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 6589 151166 $4.60* 12/05/94 $85.07 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 31618400 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 6906 6974 12/05/94 $64.92 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 31632500 31668700 CITY HALL GENE CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 7219 12/05/94 $132.23 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 151167 $282.22* 12/05/94 $295.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 112194 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS 151168 $295.00* 12/05/94 $43.50 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES 111494/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 12/05/94 $27..57 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES 111494/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 12/05/94 $27.57 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES 111494/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 12/05/94 $4.95 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 111094/R COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 151169 $103.59* 12/05/94 $3,785.54 US WEST COMMUNICATION CISCO ROUTER 560855 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 5155 151170 $3,785.54* 12/05/94 $287.20 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $397.16 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $188.17 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 120594 120594 GOLF DOME SENIOR•CITIZEN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 12/05/94 12/05/94 $128.11 $617.61 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $139.66 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 12/05/94 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 12/05/94 .$221.70 $211.94 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 12/05/94 $448.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER 120594 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 12/05/94 $182.78 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 120594 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 151171 $2,822.93* 12/05/94 $14,888.00 USAQUATICS CEMENT WORK 10214 SWIM PROG LAND IMPROVEME 7350 151172 $14,888.00* 12/05/94 $150.00 - VANDELAC, MATT SERVICES GOLF COURSE 111.694 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 151173 $150.00* 12/05/94 $335.00 VARSITY PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER 5290 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 7223 151174 $335.00* 12/05/94 $29.82 VIDEO DUPLICATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS r 9553 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 7339 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151175 $29.82* 12/05/94 $276.84 VIKING ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1643820 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7290 12/05/94 - $76.40 VIKING ELECTRIC CONTRACTED REPAIRS CM108515 ART CENTER BLD CONTR REPAIRS 151176 $200.44* 12/05/94 $157.71 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 248641 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7251 151177 $157.71* 12/05/94 $17.84 WATER PRO PIPE 581390 GENERAL STORM PIPE 4848 151178 $17.84* 12/05/94 $218.08 WEIGLE, SUE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112194 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 151179 $218.08* 12/05/94 $208.00 WENDORF, HAROLD AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151180 $208.00* 12/05/94 $235.48 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ACCESSORIES 15322 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7080 12/05/94 $267.69 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 15346 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7256 151181 $503.17* 12/05/94 $96.00 WICKER, CYD AC INSTRUCTOR 112894 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 151182 $96.00* 12/05/94 $226.88 WILLIAMS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 58766801 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 7151 151183 $226.88* 12/05/94 $328.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 8797 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 151184 $328.00* 12/05/94 $13.75 WITTE, LEONE E ELECTION JUDGE TRAIN 112994 ELECTION SALARIES REG 151185 $13.75* 12/05/94 $135.00 WOLFF, RAY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 111794 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACEM 6704 151186 .$135.00* 12/05/94 $105.38 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41312 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $194.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41314 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $475.95 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 40998 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $358.16 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41177 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $448.92 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41180 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $564.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41273 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 $373.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41179 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/05/94 - $14.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41048 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 151187 $2,505.66* 12/05/94 $37.65 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE DRUGS 54180567 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 7295 12/05/94 $43.26 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54180480 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME 151188 $80.91* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Dec 1 1994 23:41:38 Page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - - - - - -- - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT ---- - - - -PO -NUM. ------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 12/05/94 $54,090.29 ZIEGLER INC 3YD LOADER 1986501 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5796 12/05/94 - $64.56 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS KR35860 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 12/05/94 $164.28 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS FM537829 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7316 151189 $54,190.01* $657,172.48 • COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Dec 1 1994 23:43:03 Page 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $152,246.77 FUND # 11 C.D.B.G. $416.50 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATION $81.68 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $147.74 FUND # 23 ART CENTER . $10,834.93 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL $14,888.00 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE $18,980.94 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA $4,160.18 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE $1,217.31 FUND # 30 EDINB /CENT LAKES $13,540.61 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $267,387.77 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER $2,011.91 FUND # 42 RECYCLING $38,711.24 FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $79,056.19 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCT FUND $53,490.71 $657,172.48 RUST Environment & Infrastructure RECEIVED DEC - 1 1994 CITY OF EDINA BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 0 Statement of Qualifications Industrial Hygiene Services Prepared by: RUST Environment & Infrastructure 3033 Campus Drive Suite 175 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612/551 -1001) QUALITY INTEGRITY ♦ CRE ,T • RE�S'P O N�S'P✓E�NiES S KWENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene and Safety Services * Current Industrial Hygiene and Safety Staff Locations Industrial Hygiene & Safety Contacts California Minnesota Kevin Sturt David Downs, CIH Mark Gigas, CIH 3033 Campus Drive, Suite 175 18401 Von Darman Ave, Suite 550 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Irvine, CA 92715 (612) 551 -1001 (714)251 -6400 Jeff Holcomb, Bus. Dev. Mgr.. Colorado Mike Thomas, CIH 6143 South Willow Drive, Suite 200 Englewood, CO 80111 (303) 694 -6660 Tom Boehnke, Bus. Dev. Mgr. Georgia Dwayne Cheatom 3980 DeKalb Tech. Plwy NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30340 (404) 458 -9309 Dave Priddy, Bus. Dev. Mgr. Florida Timothy Caughey, CIH 370 S. North Lake Blvd, Suite 1028 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 (407) 331 -5967 Robert Prescott 1515 North Federal Hwy, Suite 405 Boca Raton, FL 33432 (407) 393 -0076 Valerie Varan, Bus. Dev. Mgr. Illinois Lois Kimmelman 1240 East Diehl Road Naperville, IL 60563 (708) 955 -6600 Fred Nelson, Bus. Dev. Mgr. New York Joe Brown, CIH 1743 Western Ave. Albany, NY 12203 (518) 456 -1994 Ohio Karen Hendrickson 11785 Highway Drive, Suite 100 Cincinnati, OH 45241 (513) 73.3 -9374 Howard Withrow, Bus. Dev. Mgr. South Carolina Betty Hams, CIH 15 Brendan Way Greenville, SC 29615 (803) 234 -3000 Charles Isham, Bus. Dev. Mgr. Texas Henry Liserio, CIH 100 Glenborough, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77067 (713) 875 -0004 Paul Wibbenmeyer, Bus. Dev. Mgr. Virginia Linda Maillet, CIH 2800 East Parham Road Richmond, VA 23228 (804) 264 -5068 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Consulting Services Industrial Hygiene and Safety Consulting services provided by RUST Environment & Infrastructure span the associated fields of industrial hygiene engineering, indoor air pollution consultation, health risk assessment, safety engineering and occupational health consulting. Our staff of professionals include Registered Professional Engineers, Certified Industrial Hygienists and Certified Safety Professionals. The experience of the staff includes manufacturing industries, mining, construction, governmental agencies and academic appointments. This diverse background enables the staff to provide comprehensive programs in the following areas: Industrial Hygiene Evaluations Worker Exposure Monitoring Environmental Health and Safety Audits Health Risk Assessments Process Safety Evaluations Asbestos Assessment/Management Indoor Air Quality Laboratory Fume Hood Evaluation Noise Measurement/Evaluation Hazardous Waste Site Services Ergonomic Analysis Radiation Safety Design Projects Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Replacement and Make -Up Air Asbestos Abatement Project Design Laboratory Design Hazard Communication and Training MSDS Development and Review HAZWOPER Training Programs Respiratory Protection Programs Employee Right to Know Training Confined Space Entry Programs/Training Chemical Hygiene Plans Lockout/Tagout Programs Community Right -to -Know Research and Development Projects Expert Witness Investigation and Testimony INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE & SAFETY EVALUATIONS Worker Exposure Monitoring Under the direct supervision of a Certified Industrial Hygienist, a project team gathers exposure data for chemical substances and physical agents in the workplace environment. Projects vary from potential exposure to a single chemical to the diverse exposures that may be experienced in an integrated chemical plant. RUST approaches these projects by first evaluating the work operation and the relationship between the exposed worker and that operation. This procedure includes observing the operation, reviewing it with management and operation personnel, and carefully designing the exposure measurement protocol for accurate and meaningful data collection. The goal of the evaluation is to understand how and why the worker is exposed, not just to measure the exposure level. In many industries, routine monitoring of workplace exposures is a regulatory requirement. Many corporations are setting up systems to maintain industrial hygiene monitoring data for purposes of exposure documentation, medical management, and risk notification recordkeeping. RUST has experienced industrial hygienists and technicians who will work with clients to collect monitoring data in a cost effective manner. All data are reviewed by a Certified Industrial Hygienist to ensure integrity of the information. Environmental Health and Safety Audits The Environmental Health and Safety audit process provides local operations management with an assessment of their compliance with governmental regulations and a prioritization of areas which need improvement. In addition, the audit will provide corporate management information regarding environmental safety and health risks that may impact the long -term profitability of the enterprise. The approach emphasizes a "partnership" relationship between local and corporate management. The audits have several characteristics: - Multidisciplinary approach- The issues investigated include aspects of safety, industrial hygiene and environmental risks. All of these risks can have a significant impact on the profitability of the company and careful management of all areas is required. As always, setting priorities for response actions is critical. - Process evaluation- The most effective means of conducting a valid audit of operations and equipment is to review, understand and be able to evaluate the production and maintenance processes being conducted in the facility. The "blind" use of a checklist type approach can result in missing important facts if the survey team is not familiar with the processes being used. Program evaluation - An audit of only the physical facilities and operations does not provide adequate information on the long term management of safety, health and environmental issues. An evaluation of existing programs and procedures to manage these issues are included in the audit. Where programs and procedures are not yet in place, specific recommendations are provided. -Regulatory compliance assessment- As a minimum, an evaluation of compliance with local, State and Federal regulations is included in the audit process. Beyond regulatory compliance, however, the RUST team has the experience, knowledge and judgment to evaluate the risk associated with the materials and operations being evaluated. -Prioritization of recommended actions -The audit team will provide judgment in prioritization of any recommended actions and guidance in completion of the actions. Health Risk Assessments In the complex industrial environment, a multi - discipline approach allows RUST's toxicologists and industrial hygienists to evaluate the workplace conditions, the nature of the operation and the man - machine interface. Our Risk Assessment and Industrial Hygiene staff work together on specific projects to evaluate the health risk of exposures. This allows for complete assessment of potential hazards within the workplace and integrates toxicological information with the exposure data. Asbestos Assessments and Management Planning The evaluation and control of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) has evolved into a specialized process which requires unique training, certifications and experience. RUST staff have these qualifications and employ state -of -the art techniques to each phase of the asbestos project. -Asbestos Assessment- The assessment of a facility for ACM may be the most critical phase in terms of the need for experienced project staff. RUST has developed an inspection and reporting format which provides information and management options. Field data areentered into a computerized data management system for area prioritization. The analysis is based on ACM condition factors, recommended abatement procedures, and remedial budget - level cost data. -Operations and Management Programs- If ACM is discovered in a facility, removal is not the only abatement option. In many cases, proper maintenance of ACM is the best approach from the standpoint of occupant safety. We can design Operation and Maintenance programs to fit the unique needs of our clients. -Management Planning- The task of scheduling abatement actions and maintenance activities can also be handled by our expert. staff. RUST has provided guidance to corporate and facility managers in designing the proper response and long -term planning programs needed for prudent ACM management. Project Monitoring- RUST's abatement monitoring technicians often provide a variety of services during abatement projects. We typically work as a representative of the facility owner, ensuring that the project specifications and state /federal regulations are being met. We document the air quality inside and outside the abatement area, enforce specification requirements as well as record project progress, and confirm final cleaning standards. The result provides the owner with a complete documentation report. Indoor Air Quality Today's higher standards of energy conservation and advanced construction techniques have resulted in a greater incidence of air- quality problems in buildings. The RUST approach emphasizes an understanding of the building systems and operations as the basis for the investigation of these problems. Our engineering experience and background in ventilation system design is beneficial in this project phase. Sophisticated approaches to air quality testing and tracer gas studies are utilized to provide practical solutions to the problem. The general investigative approach is conducted as a series of phases, with the scope of subsequent phases based on the results of the initial investigations: • RUST conducts a physical inspection of the overall facility, including a general review of the Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems and other mechanical areas. The purpose of this inspection is primarily to familiarize the investigator with the types of materials and systems used in the facility and the types of operations and occupancy of the facility. • RUST will often conduct a survey of the occupants of the facility to gain a better understanding of the types of problems and concerns expressed by the occupants. The analysis of the survey responses is used to determine the overall occupant complaint rate, identify any predominant types of complaints and identify particular areas of the building where complains are more frequent. The interviews are conducted in person and the survey responses are held in confidence. • Based on the results of these preliminary activities, an assessment of the building conditions is made. The inspection and survey results will be used to identify the most likely targets for further investigation, if warranted. Further investigation may include specific air quality testing, analysis of building materials or furnishings, detailed inspection of HVAC systems, evaluation of building controls systems and /or evaluation of outside air quality. Laboratory Fume Hood Evaluation Gerhard Knutson, Ph.D., CIH with RUST, developed the methods for laboratory fume hood performance evaluations used in the ASHRAE /ANSI standard 110. Evaluations are conducted for appliance manufacturers prior to installation for purposes of design testing. Testing is also conducted in "As Used" conditions to properly evaluate the impact of the installed ventilation systems and other design parameters. Routine testing can be conducted to test the effectiveness of hoods over time in critical performance operations. Noise Measurement and Evaluation RUST conducts noise surveys to determine employee exposure and compliance with the OSHA noise standard. Where noise levels require the implementation of a Hearing Conservation Program, the details of the program can be developed. More detailed engineering measurements of the noise sources can be made to develop control recommendations. Hazardous Waste Site Services RUST's industrial hygienists work as site safety officers during hazardous waste remediation projects. We provide 40 -hour OSHA training for clients who work on such sites, as well as the 8- hour refresher courses. Our work experience in this area gives us the background to develop detailed site safety and health project plans and specifications. HAZARD COMMUNICATION AND TRAINING SERVICES MSDS Development and Review Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) provide information to safety and health personnel concerning the materials used in the facility. . Our experienced industrial hygienists and toxicologists have established programs for collecting or upgrading Material Safety Data Sheets specific to a manufacturing facility. Our staff review the data sheets for consistency and establish a uniform format and nomenclature to make the MSDS more understandable and accessible to personnel in the workplace. We utilize a custom designed computer software application to manage MSDS and support documentation. Hazardous Waste Operations Training RUST has developed all aspects of the training requirements of CFR 1910.120 for presentation within your operations or at our site. The program utilizes experts who have had responsibility for development of Health and Safety Plans for numerous projects and who have had on -site experience. Our courses can be customized to meet your specific needs, while satisfying the requirements of the standards. Respiratory Protection Programs and Training Whenever respiratory protection is used in the workplace, OSHA regulations require a respiratory protection program and adequate training for all individuals who wear respiratory protection. Our industrial hygiene professionals have developed numerous respiratory protection programs for industries ranging from pharmaceutical laboratories to non - ferrous smelters. Employee training programs for respiratory protection include proper methods for care and use of respiratory protection and respiratory fit testing. Employee Right to Know /Hazard Communication Traininq State Worker Right -to -Know laws and the federal Hazard Communication Regulation require adequate training of workers potentially exposed to industrial hazards within the workplace. RUST staff can provide training directly to the work force; or we can train others to provide the required instruction. Confined Space Entry Programs /Training State requirements for programs in facilities and operations with confined spaces which require entry will soon be adopted by Federal OSHA. RUST has developed such programs and has provided the necessary training for employees and supervisors. Chemical Hygiene Plans RUST has developed and implemented effective Chemical Hygiene Plans for numerous laboratory operations. With this background, as well as our broad experience in laboratory ventilation and design, we can assist in developing an effective plan for your laboratory operations. We provide worker education classes, air quality monitoring, ventilation evaluation /testing and waste disposal consulting to help implement the plan. DESIGN PROJECTS Industrial Exhaust Ventilation We have designed over 50 industrial exhaust systems with construction costs ranging from $3,000 to over $5,000,000. Many of these projects have involved the revision of material handling systems or process changes. Project sizes range from a single hood to a total production facility with an entirely new manufacturing building. In many cases, the projects involved existing facilities where significant effort was required to coordinate system installation with production requirements in order to minimize downtime. Many of these projects have undergone performance evaluations based on worker exposure, alleviation of neighborhood nuisance, and regulatory compliance. Design projects have been completed for a variety of industries including non- ferrous smelters and refineries, polymers, battery manufacturers, research laboratories, steel fabricators, computer component assembly, wood- working, fiberglass manufacturing, flour mills and grain elevators, plating and etching rooms, lead shot towers, ammunition plants, pharmaceutical manufacturing, coal mining, grey iron foundries, can plants, and hospitals. Process and material handling modifications can reduce the cost of environmental controls and often result in better production control. Close attention is paid to energy recovery opportunities, from exhaust air or process heat, when designing such facilities. Special expertise has been developed in the control design for clean air recirculation. This approach safely recovers 100 percent of otherwise wasted heat. Replacement and Make -up Air When an exhaust system is installed, an equal amount of replacement air is required. To ensure optimum operation of the exhaust system and allow for. worker comfort, a design is necessary which ensures that the replacement air system does not challenge the exhaust system. Otherwise, air currents from the replacement air system may reduce the efficiency of the exhaust system. Asbestos Abatement Project Design When it becomes necessary to abate ACM, the development of detailed abatement specifications can help ensure a successful project. RUST's past project design experience has included a wide variety of projects, from routine ACM floor the removal to complex fireproofing removal in occupied high- rises. RUST has the expertise to design asbestos projects which minimize risk and maximize project efficiency. Laboratory Design The experience of RUST in the evaluation of laboratory fume hoods and associated ventilation systems has led to the establishment of criteria for optimal design of laboratory ventilation systems. RUST experts have participated in a multitude of laboratory projects ranging from laboratory hood evaluation to the detailed design and specifications for a laboratory renovation project. In particular, the use of Variable Air Volume (VAV) systems for laboratories has been reviewed in detail in a number of projects. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development work has been performed in the following areas: • Air pollution control equipment - fabric filters and wet scrubbers. • High altitude sampling - compensation of respiratory mass samplers for high altitude by sampling known dust clouds in an altitude chamber. • Laboratory fume hoods - development of a performance test and the investigation of the influence of room air supply on laboratory hood performance. • Respirable mass sampling- a study of errors caused by sampling flow rate, approach velocity, and sampler position. Recirculation dust filters - development of test apparatus for predicting efficiency and life of back -up filters. • Evaporation studies- development of a procedure for determining, under controlled conditions, the evaporation rate of a spilled organic liquid. EXPERT WITNESS INVESTIGATION AND TESTIMONY RUST has experience in providing legal testimony for air pollution equipment warranties, explosions, liability cases, OSHA citations, public hearings, and worker's compensation claims. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Experience Matrix 8!25183 0 - Denotes Discipline Leader 0 - Denotes Project Experience Discipline Area H---rd Communication and Safety Training �� ■ ■MD ■�i00 ■■ OMENMENOM■ ■ENNEN 1000IN ■MME■ ■0 DD ■ ■� ■DO ■��0 DMMO1EDE■ ME ■N■■ 1313130 INEEME1313 OODOi0000�0�0 DOMMOMO■ 1300000 MEMO ■M013MO13 O131013MEDN013■■ ■O13MONOW 1313131301 0000 13MOM■OO 1111111111111111111113MMINEEK313MMINK] ONOOMINE■ ■WEEME O■EO ■OMOMOO D ■ ■ ■■� ■D ■■■■ 0E■■■E■■ ■M ■E■■ NONE MIME■■■■ • •• ■■■■ ■E■■EN13M ■■MOM■■■ ■M ■N■■ ■ ■■M ■M■M■MIE • DD ■oNOO ■0�0E OMIE■DINED MIN■■■■ ■■M■ ■■■OM■■ 1111111111111111111313MEMEME1301ME ■D■■ ■ME■ 131313131313 ■■■■ 01313■DO (*T. FT.T. . 13D����i000�MI013130131313130 ■DEEM■ 13131313 ■ ■■M ■O■ . DD■ ■Moo ■ONMIE ■0000000 MD■■M■ 13M013 M■MD■0M •. 13ODD1313MD1310■■ OE131313a13EI MWMMMM 13M013 ■M■1301313 •. •:: ��■ ■00�DENMIM M■INIOMM■■ MiOMM■M 1310013 NM■■ ■M■ • _ 01300131001000■[ 1300013013E 13OWIEMM M1390M ■1013 M■DD 1313MD13013E00M■ ■W131313M■■ ■■■NN■ 13131313 EE ■■E■■ [3o ■■ ■ ■o ■ ■OMI■ ■o ■a ■NN■ aoMNN■ 1313013 MI■MMMO■ OD ■000�DD�MIM DDOMDaMM MOMMMM 13MMO MID■OM■M • ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■0EM�0 M■MM■MMM M■M■MM MEMO ■■MM■■0 NE ■EN ■�EEMM■ OEM■■■■■ MM■M■M oENO ■■MM■■■ 0000 ■OOOOOMI[3 131313131300E MO■■■■ 0000 0MOKN■13O • D ■■ ■�aaa■OMIE ■MNMOE■o M■■■M■iOMM■ ■MM■■IN■ .. :.. OD ■EEO ■O��OM 1310ONDEIME EMMEME MIMMM ■MMMMOM • IMMENEDEDE ■EM MMMMMMMM MENNEN OMME) ■MMOMMD •� 010■EMONUME■M 130MINMENO MMMEMM MEMO oMEMEO■ ' 11111111111111111113131313131313MIOMMIM 131EMMKOMa■ 131313[3[3[ 13131313 011013■■1013 130MO■ ■0■OtOEM 9000900M■KE ■IN■■■■ MEMO MMM0013M • ■E ■■■OM■MM■M 00IU■ENMN■ ■M■■■■ ■■M■ o■M■W 00�00��00�0� O■EIIE OODE ■0■■■■ [EMKO0 ■OMEMIN■ 00■■ ■0■ ■13■■■ ■1313130EEM ■■MEN■ 900013 ■■■■■010 ' 130000000130013 1313131313O13M ■D■ ■N■ 131313[3 MI■M■ ■1313 ■■■■ ■13■13�MMIa 13013■93130■ ■ ■■■ ■N NOME ■■ME■N■ OMEMMOMOOM■M DMD■OfMM MOMMEM WMEO MIEEMENO _ ��ENNOE� ■OMI■ Do0INKEi0MIM ■M■■■M DD13M ■MMEMIN■ •' DE ■ ■ ■EN�MMMIM ■MDOM■■■ ■M■■MM 0000 0■EE■M■ • WMEEEN■ ■■MM■ ■EEEM■■■ 130001N■ 0000 ■M■MMMD • o■■EE■■oM■oo ■0000■■■ ■M■■M■ 0000 ■■■■EMo D■ ■EEO ■ ■EMMIN ■M013■■■M ■OMMM■ 1300113 oM ■ ■M ■0 130■ ■■00013■■■ ■■1313[313■M ■MEME■ 13000 o■oM■oo ■■ ■a■a�EMNMIE ■■MOM■■M ■■MOM■ 0000 RI■■ ■NN■ • 00IN13KE0130I■0■13 1013D1313MMIN oo ■■E■ [31313[3 010013013■ • 0■■■MIN■O ■0013 LONIE■O■■■ ■■■■■N [D■■■ ■NNM■00 • 0■■■■■■■E■K3O ■■■■■■E■ ■■NOON NEON EM■ ■■N■ OOODNDOOiOOMIN oo■M■EE■ ■o■M■■ oE■■ HI■0 ■■13[3 • OMME ■N■ ■N■oM ■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■N■■ ■ ■E■ EEEEE■■ D ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■D ■ ■ ■■ ■■■OM■■M ■o■ ■N■ KE101313 RU■■ ■■ ■0 • 1313■a0�13���MI■ 9090130113M■■ ■WE■■■ oEM■ o■■■MDO D■■■■ONONNMI■ OM13■O130M ■ENNE■ ■E■■ MM■00MI13 • OOD■■013000MI■ 13■1313131090M ■WM■■M O■■■ W10M0131313 oa ■aMOO ■M�0■ 01300KEEM■ ■0■ ■M■ 0000 EKEMMEO01 Iwo o■■■■■■o■o■M 000■ao■o ■■■■■■ N■■■ ■■■ ■■o■ 8!25183 0 - Denotes Discipline Leader 0 - Denotes Project Experience LISA BARNES Regional Health and Safety Officer EDUCATION B.S. 1986, Chemistry, Drexel University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AHERA Certified Inspector /Management Planner /Project Designer Asbestos Safety Technician - New Jersey Asbestos Removal Worker - New Jersey State Restricted Handler II /III - New York AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluations Noise Evaluation /Control ROGER S. BERKOWITZ, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Parsippany Office Location Minneapolis B.S. 1984 Chemical Engineering - Rose - Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AHERA Certified Asbestos Inspector/ Management Planner /Project Designer Engineer -in- Training - Indiana 40 hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Site Workers 8 hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Site Supervisors AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazard Communication and Safety Training Occupational Safety and Health Audits Asbestos Management Regulatory Assistance Indoor Air Quality Investigations Ionizing /Nonionizing Radiation Lead Assessment Management LEWIS N. BLAIR, CIH Supervisor, Industrial Hygiene Department EDUCATION B.S. 1964, Geological Engineering, University of Missouri Columbia PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION Certified Industrial Hygienist, Engineering Aspects AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Ventilation Air Pollution Assessment /Control Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Noise Evaluation /Control Nonionizing Radiation Hazard Communication and Safety Training Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance KARL O. BRAUN, PE, CIH Project Engineer EDUCATION B.S., 1980, Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota B.S., 1976, Microbiology, University of Minnesota PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer, Minnesota PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION Certified Industrial Hygienist, Engineering Aspects AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Ventilation Industrial Hygiene Surveys Heat Stress Evaluation Noise Evaluation /Control Hazard Communication and Safety Training Lead Assessment /Management Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance Office Location Minneapolis Office Location Minneapolis JOE BROWN, CIH Manager, Environmental Health and Safety EDUCATION M.S. 1978, Environmental Studies, University of Rochester B.A. 1976, Biology, University of Rochester PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Heat Stress Evaluation Nonionizing Radiation Hazard Communication and Safety Training Building Inspection/ Management Planner Process Safety Review Emergency Preparedness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance Office Location Albany JEFFREY W. BUB Office Location Corporate Health and Safety Technician Sheboygan EDUCATION Associate Degree, 1989, Hazardous Materials, Lakeshore Technical College, Cleveland, Wisconsin PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified by the U.S. Department of Energy for Nuclear Material Packaging and Transportation AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services HAZWOPER Training Programs DANIEL BURGESS Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION Office Location Broomfield Quantitative Industrial Hygiene, 1989, American Industrial Hygiene Association U.S. Air Force Environmental Health Service, School of Aerospace Medicine AREAS OF SPECIALTY Ionizing Radiation Occupational Safety and Health Audits DEAN CALHOUN Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.S., Petroleum Engineering PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist -in- Training Engineer -in- Training, Wyoming AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Indoor Air Quality Investigation Heat Stress Evaluation Noise Evaluation /Control Office Location Englewood KNOWLTON J. CAPLAN, CIH, CSP Office Location Senior Industrial Hygiene Consultant Minneapolis EDUCATION M.S., 1942, Chemical Engineering, Washington University B.S., 1940, Chemical Engineering, Washington University PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Professional Engineer: Arizona, Michigan, Texas, California, Minnesota, Utah, Illinois, Missouri, Virginia, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Kansas PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist Certified Safety Professional AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Ventilation Industrial Hygiene Surveys Heat Stress Evaluation /Control Noise Evaluation /Control Process Safety Analysis Expert Witness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance TIMOTHY F. CAUGHEY, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION MPH Degree in Industrial Hygiene, University of South Florida, 1986 B.S. Degree, Pre -Med Biology, St. Francis College, Pennsylvania, 1978 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist Certified Hazardous Materials Manager Certified Audiometric Technician Licensed Asbestos Consultant (Florida) AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management Occupational Safety and Health Audits Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluation Noise Evaluation /Control Nonionizing Radiation Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation DWAYNE CHEATOM Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Orlando Office Location Atlanta M.S. (in progress), Technical Management, Southern College of Technology, Atlanta B.S. 1984, Biology (pre- medicine), Dillard University, New Orleans PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Registered Environmental Manager AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazard Communication and Safety Training Indoor Air Quality Investigations Heat Stress Evaluation Asbestos Management Lead Assessment /Management Emergency Preparedness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance RICHARD K. DORMAN Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Greenville B.S. Business Administration and Industrial Safety, Newberry College, South Carolina, 1986 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Asbestos Abatement Supervisor Licensed Asbestos Consultant, SCDHEC Licensed Asbestos Air Sampling Professional, SCDHEC AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluation Emergency Preparedness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance DOUGLAS H. DORSCHNER Senior Industrial Hygiene Technician EDUCATION St. Paul Vocational Institute - 1981 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA Accredited Building Inspector and Management Planner, AHERA 40 hour Training for Hazardous Waste Operations AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Office Location Minneapolis DAVID E. DOWNS, CIH, CSP Industrial Hygiene Department Manager EDUCATION M.S. 1977, Industrial Hygiene, Texas A & M University B.S. 1972, Industrial Safety, Texas A & M University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist - 1980 Certified Safety Professional - 1978 AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Design and Evaluation Process Safety Review Expert Witness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance LAZARO FERNANDEZ Senior Asbestos Assessment Technician EDUCATION B.S. 1982, Environmental Sciences, University of Florida B.A. 1979, Business Administration, University of Vermont AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Heat Stress Evaluation Office Location Minneapolis Office Location Boca Raton KEVIN M. FLORENCE Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.A. 1984, Natural Sciences, St. John's University AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Noise Evaluation Asbestos Management Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Occupational Safety and Health Audits MARK GIGAS, CIH Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Minneapolis Office Location Irvine /San Pedro M.S. 1980, Public Health, Environmental Sciences, University of California B.S. 1976, Biochemistry, California Polytechnic State University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist Registered Environmental Assessor, California AHERA Trained Building Inspector for ACM AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Asbestos Management Emergency Preparedness Hazard Communication and Safety Training PATRICIA GOODMAN Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION Front Range Community College, 1990 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Asbestos Supervisor and Management Planner Emergency Response - Levels 1, 2, and 3 AREAS OF SPECIALTY Ionizing Radiation Occupational Safety and Health Audits Office Location Broomfield LESLIE GRACZ Office Location Health and Safety Specialist Buffalo EDUCATION B.A. Geology, 1986, State University College at Buffalo PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Asbestos Supervisors Certificate - New York Asbestos Handling Certificate - New York Restricted Asbestos Handler II- Asbestos Project Sampling Technician - New York Restricted Asbbestos Handler III - New York EPA Inspector Training EPA Management Planners Training AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Managment HAZWOPER Training Programs Indoor Air Quality Investigations BETTY S. HARRIS, CIH, CHMM Project Manager EDUCATION Office Location Greenville M.P.H. 1980, Industrial Hygiene, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia B.S. 1975, Biology, University of South Carolina, Columbia PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist, Comprehensive Practice Certified Hazardous Materials Manager Certified Asbestos Abatement Supervisor, AHERA Building Inspector, and AHERA Management Planner AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluation Noise Evaluation /Control Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Lead Assessment /Management Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance KAREN S. HENDRICKSON Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.S. 1985, Environmental Health, Wright State University AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Noise Evaluation /Control Asbestos Building Inspection /Management Planner Occupational Safety and Health Audits Office Location Cincinnati WENDY JOHNSON, CIH, CSP Health and Safety Officer EDUCATION Office Location Broomfield M.S., Mine Health and Safety, Colorado School of Mines, In Progress B.S., 1984, Environmental Health, Minor - Chemistry, Colorado State University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist Certified Safety Professional Active DOE Q Clearance AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Ionizing Radiation Hazard Communication and Safety Training Regulatory Assistance JONATHAN A. KAIBEL Office Location Industrial Hygiene Technician Englewood EDUCATION A.A.S. 1984, Bismarck State College PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AHERA Accredited Building Inspector Management Planner AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Emergency Preparedness Regulatory Assistance LOIS KIMMELMAN, CIH Office Location Senior Environmental Scientist Naperville EDUCATION M.P.H. 1985, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois M.S. 1975, Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania B.A. 1974, Liberal Arts, Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Industrial Hygiene Surveys Lead Assessment /Management Occupational Safety and Health Audits GERHARD W. KNUTSON, Ph.D., CIH Senior Consultant EDUCATION Ph.D., 1968, Math, Michigan State University MPH, 1978, Occupational Health, University of Minnesota M.S., 1967, Math, Michigan State University B.A., 1965, Math and Physics, College of St. Thomas PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist Active "Q" Clearance AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Ventilation Evaluation /Design Laboratory Fume Hood Evaluation Laboratory Ventilation Evaluation Design Asbestos Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazard Communication and Safety Training Expert Witness Regulatory Assistance Office Location Minneapolis DARYL B. KORPELA, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Minneapolis M.S. 1977, Environmental Health- Industrial Hygiene and Air Pollution, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis B.S. 1972, Biology/ Mathematics, Bemidji State University, Minnesota PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigation Noise Evaluations Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Occupational Safety and Health Audits Expert Witness Regulatory Assistance STEPHANIE A. LEDBETTER Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.S. 1988, Environmental Health, Colorado State University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA Accredited Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Lead Assessment /Management Ergonomic Analysis Regulatory Assistance Office Location Englewood HENRY J. LISERIO, CIH Chemical Engineer /Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.S. Chemical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation ELLIS V. LUMPKINS Microanalyst /Asbestos Assessment Technician EDUCATION Valencia Community College - Orlando, Florida - 1978 AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Heat Stress Evaluation Regulatory Assistance Industrial Hygiene Surveys Office Location Houston Office Location Boca Raton LINDA M. MAILLET, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION M.S. 1990,, Industrial Hygiene, Virginia Commonwealth University B.S. 1985, Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Office Location Richmond Certified Industrial Hygienist Asbestos Inspector, Asbestos Management Planner, Project Designer - Virginia Project Designer, Project Monitor - North Carolina AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluation Noise Evaluation /Control Nonionizing Radiation Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Asbestos Management Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance PAMELA MARKELZ Office Location Corporate Health and Safety Manager Sheboygan EDUCATION B.S. 1973, Biology, University of Wisconsin- Oshkosh, Special Emphasis Microbiology /Public Health PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Certified Safety Executive, Certified Safety Manager, and Certified Safety Specialist Certified Environmental Trainer AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services JOHN MECOM Senior Industrial Hygiene Technician EDUCATION Office Location Minneapolis B.A., 1982, Social Science, Chapman College A.A.S., 1980, Environmental Health Technology, Community College of the U.S. Air Force AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Industrial Hygiene Surveys Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Regulatory Assistance HAROLD E. MOORE 11 Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Greenville B.S. 1985, Mining Engineering Technology, Fairmont State College, West Virginia PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified AHERA Building Inspector Certified AHERA Management Planner Licensed AHERA Consultant, SCDHEC Licensed Asbestos Evaluation Specialist Certified Hazardous Waste Site Supervisor AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Asbestos Management Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Hazard Communication and Safety Training SEAN O'LEARY Industrial Hygiene Technician EDUCATION B.S. 1986, Biology, State University of New York at Binghamton PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Asbestos Inspector New York AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Asbestos Management Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services PETER H. OTT Industrial Ventilation Design EDUCATION Architecture - Carnegie - Mellon University - 1974 - 1976 AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Design and Evaluation Industrial Hygiene Surveys SYD PINCOCK Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION A.A.S., 1982, Ricks College, Rexburg, Idaho AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Industrial Hygiene Surveys Ionizing/ Nonionizing Radiation Regulatory Assistance Office Location Albany Office Location Minneapolis Office Location Grand Junction JEFFREY R. PRESCHER Office Location Asbestos Program Manager Minneapolis EDUCATION B.A. 1986, Luther College PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA -AHERA Accredited Building Inspector and Management Planner EPA -AHERA Accredited Asbestos Abatement Contractor /Site Supervisor Minnesota Fire Safety Inspector AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Asbestos Awareness Training Lead Assessment /Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys ROBERT T. PRESCOTT JR. Office Location Asbestos /Industrial Hygiene Manager Boca Raton EDUCATION B.S., Building Construction, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia, 1980 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA Building Inspector/ Management Planner, Georgia Institute of Technology EPA Contractor /Supervisor, Georgia Institute of Technology EPA Advanced Supervisor, Georgia Institute of Technology EPA Project Designer, Georgia Institute of Technology EPA Radon Tester /Mitigator, University of Minnesota AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Hygiene Surveys Heat Stress Evaluation Lead Assessment /Management ROBERT RAFFERTY Environmental Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION B.S. 19B4, Geology, Syracuse University, New York PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AHERA Certified Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner Certified Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner - New York Asbestos Safety Technician - New Jersey AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Asbestos Awareness Training Indoor Air Quality Investigations Lead Assessment /Management MICHAEL E. RAMER, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION B.S., Chemistry PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Indoor Air Quality Investigations Noise Evaluation /Control Nonionizing Radiation Emergency Preparedness Occupational Safety and Health Audits Office Location Albany Office Location Englewood THOMAS R. RICHARDS Senior Health and Safety Manager EDUCATION Medical Technology, Utah State University, Logan PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Occupational Health and Safety Technologist Certified Radiation Protection Technologist Asbestos Certified Certified Respiratory Protection Administrator AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Hazard Communication and Safety Training Ionizing /Nonionizing Radiation Industrial Hygiene Surveys VICKI ROTHMAN Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION Biology Major, Mesa State College Radiation Biology Course, Oklahoma State University AREAS OF EXPERTISE Ionizing/ Nonionizing Radiation Industrial Hygiene Surveys Office Location Grand Junction Office Location Broomfield MICHAEL E. RUSSELL, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION M.S. 1982, Environmental Health, University of Minnesota B.S. 1979, Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Noise Evaluation Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance TODD SAVKO Health and Safety Specialist EDUCATION Office Location Minneapolis Office Location Broomfield B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Pima Community College (In Progress) AREAS OF EXPERTISE Ionizing Radiation Industrial Hygiene Surveys GREGORY D. SCOVILL Asbestos Project Manager /Designer EDUCATION Office Location Minneapolis B.A. in progress, Mankato State University Previous studies at Mankato State University, MN and Butte College, Durham, CA PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA Certified Asbestos Contractor /Supervisor National Asbestos Council EPA Worker Training AHERA Asbestos Abatement Project Designer Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Industrial Hygiene Surveys Industrial Exhaust Ventilation Evaluation Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Lead Assessment /Management Regulatory Assistance RONNEY C. SMITH Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Colorado Springs B.S. 1985, Environmental Engineering, Kennedy - Western University AAS 1983, Environmental Control, Illinois Vocational School PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS EPA Accredited Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Management KEVIN J. STURT Health and Safety Manager EDUCATION B.S. 1989, Behavorial Science, National University, Irvine, California A.A. 1988, National University, Irvine, California AREAS OF SPECIALTY Hazard Communication and Safety Training Handling and Disposal of Hazardous Materials Industrial Hygiene Surveys Emergency Preparedness Regulatory Assistance Occupational Health and Safety Audits Office Location Irvine MICHAEL A. THOMAS, CIH, CHMM . Office Location Senior Industrial Hygienist Englewood EDUCATION MPH 1983, Environmental and Industrial Health, University of Michigan B.S. 1981, Natural Resources, University of Michigan PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Industrial Hygienist - 1988 EPA and State of Colorado Accredited Asbestos Inspector, Management Planner, Designer and Abatement Supervisor Certified Hazardous Materials Manager AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Indoor Air Quality Investigations Hazardous Waste Site Safety Services Heat Stress Evaluation Hazard Communication and Safety Training Asbestos Building Inspection/ Management Planner Ergonomic Analysis Occupational Safety and Health Audits Regulatory Assistance KENNETH VILKAITIS Project Scientist EDUCATION Office Location Naperville B.S., Engineering and Engineering Technology (Occupational Safety emphasis) AREAS OF SPECIALTY Asbestos Management Hazard Communication and Safety Training Industrial Hygiene Surveys Regulatory Assistance SHERMAN WOODSON Industrial Hygienist EDUCATION Office Location Greenville M.P.H. 1986, Industrial Hygiene, University of South Carolina, Columbia B.S. 1983, Biology, Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified AHERA Building Inspector Certified AHERA Management Planner AREAS OF SPECIALTY Industrial Hygiene Surveys Hazard Communication and Safety Training Occupational Health and Safety Audits ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Air Emission Analysis ij Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description $Location Cost 190 000 John Deere Foundry Conducted industrial ventilation evaluation, air emissions inventory , developed a IA computer database to track the data being developed and provide documentation of ventilation system. Conducted emission measurements and stack testing it Blair conjunction with evaluation of process contaminants. Evaluated contaminant control systems and developed improvement options. Project continuing, with emphasis or relation between indoor air quality control and environmental emissions imnart _ , RU�� ENVIRONMENT& y INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type : Asbestos Abatement Monitoring Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Acorn Industries RUST was retained by the asbestos abatement contractor to provide Certified NM Industrial Hygienist (CIH) overske of an abatement project for the US Air Force, which was demolishing buildings containing transite siding, floor file and mastic, and pipe insulation. On -site review of the project was conducted, including review of daily monitoring logs, visual inspection of completed areas and removal plan approval. SUNY Brockport Provided oversite of contractor remediation efforts with respect to project NY specifications and applicable regulatory compliance. Conducted ambient air monitoring inside containment and outside of the work area, as well as personal Gracz sampling. American National Can Served as sitettask manager during the removal of asbestos and lead contamination CA from the interior of an industrial facility. Responsible for oversite of specification development and supervision of contractors. Worked with local air monitoring firm in Rafferty development of air monitoring protocols and supervision of actual work zone perimeter air monitoring. RUSFENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type: Asbestos Inspection/Assessment Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Ampex Corp Client operated a 230,000 square foot manufacturing facility which was constructed CO in three phases in 1964, 1969 and 1984. A full scale survey of the facility was conducted which included categorizing homogeneous asbestos containing material (ACM) and statistically sampling the materials. The condition and assessiblity of the confirmed ACM was evaluated. RUST developed a managementplan which included an operations and maintenance program to help control release;of ACM in the building and protect employees from exposure. Alcoa Aluminum Location & ickentification (sampling) of all asbestos containing materials at the Alcoa CA Aluminum forge plant. After indentification, the condition and quantities were assessed with recommendations. Abatement projects were monitored to ensure Gigas completeness of work proper procedures used and correct disposal of ACM. Control Data Conducted an inspection and assessment of ACM in a 15 story office building, over MN $100,000 1,000,000 square feet of floor space. Data recorded in a computer database for future ACM O &M management. Prescher U.S. Postal Service Abestos consulting services for the USPS facilities service office at the Tampa FL $100,000 general mail facility (approx 500,000 sq ft). Facility survey & assessment; suspect ACM bulk sampling & analysis; survey /assessment report; CIH consultation; O & M Prescott plans; right -to -know meetings; removal plans & specs monitoring; PCM ambient, progress & clearance air sampling & analysis, lasted 19 months (1991- 1992). U.S. Army C of Eng Asbestos & lead paint consulting services for the US COE's Savannah District at 4 GA $90,000 barracks (approx 300,000 sq ft). Pre - inspection walk- throughs; fee negotiations; Prescott suspect ACM & LBP sampling plans; barracks surveys & assessment (PLM, point - counting, TEM & XRF); paint chip analysis on inconclusives; hazard assessments; cost estimates (removal); removal plans & specs (asb & LBP). Done in 2 phases (asb specs have been Ok'd by US COE; LBP is next.) Martin Yale Conducted asbestos survey, developed abatement specifications, coordinated IL $50,000 project staffing /schedules and served as client liason during all phases of project. Vlkaitis R1Ky �� ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Asbestos O &M Program Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Hoechst Celanese Wrote asbestos abatement specifications, conducted audits, conducted asbestos sC inspection and assessment, conducted remediation monitoring. Developed asbestos abatement procedures for contractors. Augmented client asbestos Dorman abatement procedures. ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Asbestos Specification ClienVProj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Confidential A major bank building was being renovated; a survey of ACM was conducted to CO determine the amount and locations of ACM which would be disturbed during the project. Removal specifications were developed and procedures for the renovation contractor were developed. Monitoring was conducted during the abatement operations. Asbestos awareness training for the general contractor employees was conducted. ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene $ Safety Project Experience Profiles Project : HAZWOPER Training Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Schlage Lock Company Operations at the facility involved metal finishing, casting, and pressing operations, CO metal cleaning. Training was provided for the staff who were part of the emergency response team. Initial training and refresher training has been provided, consisting of lecture, hands -on training exercises and simulated field exercises. Daily quizzes were niven to the course participants. Summit Environmental Training was provided for consulting company staff assigned to work at a Superfund CO site. Personnel were trained using visual aids developed specifically for the course, covering toxicology, air monitoring, health and physical hazards, decontamination, site control, personal protective equipment, medical monitoring and emergency response. Waste Management of N.A. Developed and taught 24 hour emergency response course specific to solid waste CA facilities. Formed emergency response team and drilled with L.A. City Hazmat team. Calhoun Bethlehem Steel Duties included providing hazardous waste site workers with toxicological NY information and a discussion of safe work practices for the chemicals that they would potentialy encounter during removal and disposal of contaminated soils. Cheatom Multiple Organize and present 40 hour HAZWOPER training. Revised existing plan of Nationwide $10,000 instruction for 40 hour training. Selected staff based on abilities and needs .for training. Revised individual lesson plans, enhanced organization by developing Mecom "modular training" system to allow parts to be presented /reviewed individually (i.e. confined spaces, respiratory rotection ). Waste Management NA Conduct HAZWOPER training for workers at a solid waste landfill operation. WI $7,000 Mecom ENVIRONMENT& INFRA,,,UCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles F Project Type : HazWaste Site Safety Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Confidential Surveyed facility for ACM to be removed prior to demolition, prepared specs, NJ designed air monitoring for both asbestos and hazardous waste remediation. Barnes Served as on -site H &S officer during seven month remediation, much of which was performed in Level B protection. Responsible for evaluations and worker protection for 40 workers during project. Contaminants included mercury, lead, VOC's and asbestos. Dept of Energy Health and Safety Specialist responsible for the health physics and industrial CO hygiene monitoring for various remedial investigations at Rocky Flats Plant. Includes contamination monitoring of personnel and equipment and general safety oversite. Burgess City of Cincinnati I Rust developed a site- specific Health & Safety Plan for proposed bridge /roadway OH $2,100 improvement project. A Phase I and Phase 11 environmental site evaluation of the Hendrickson project area revealed that soil where excavation for the bridge improvement would take place was contaminated with lead and tetrachloroethane. The Health and Safety plan was developed for contractor and subcontractor personnel and other site workers involved in the project who had the potential to be exposed to the site contaminants. Dept. of Energy Provision of technical support and oversite to health and safety officers for the solar CO ponds RCRA facility investigation at Rock Flats. Involves ensuring the implementation of the health and safety plan during field activities in the radiological Johnson control areas and the buffer zone. Kerr -McKee Supervised preparation of a site health and safety plan covering site radiological, IL chemical, and physical hazards during predesign activities: and conforming to the Kimmelman requirements of Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety and Illinios EPA. Performed site safety audits during field work (1992). Michgan DNR Prepared and implemented Health and Safety Plan for project site contaminated MI with benzidine and dichlorobenzidene. HASP designed to protect health and safety of on -site workers using Level B PPE, IH monitoring and project specific medical Markelz monitoring. Tasks included lagoon sampling, surface water and soil sampling and groundwater well installation and sampling. RtHFENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : HazWaste Site Safety Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost West Hazmat Corp Project involved landfill improvement where there was possible plating waste IN deposition. A site specific safety plan was developed to provide protection of client employees and surrounding public and environment. Plan addressed hazard Thomas characterization and evaluation, personnel responsibilities, accident prevention, site control, personal protection, decontamination, employee exposure and ambient air monitoring and emergency response. West Hazmat Corp. Remedial activities at an Amoco bulk storage facility in Illinois indicated petroeum CO $2,000 contamination, which required installation of a ground water pump and treat system. RUST developed a site specific Health and Safety Plan, which included provisions Thomas for employee training, medical monitoring, confined space entry procedures and safe trenching operations. West Hazmat Corp. Client was retained to investigate a site in which there was evidence of WY $800 contamination from refinery wastes, including aromatic hydrocarbons, metals polynuclear aromatics, and asbestos. RUST developed a site specific Health and Thomas Safety Plan, which addressed employee training and medical monitoring, air monitoring, confined space Entry, action levels for personal protective equipment use, emergency response procedures and decontamination procedures. RUSUENVIRONMENT & NFRASTRU... Project Type: IH Survey Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Golden Aluminum Process involved manufacture of aluminum products, including burnoff processess, CO high temperature furnaces, hot mill processes and use of caustics, acids, solvents and lubricants. Project included training, air monitoring, heat stress evaluation. Em to ee trainina proaram was developed based on data from survey. Apple Computer RUST E &I is providing environmental, health and safety services on a full time basis CO to develop and implenent required programs. Programs include Hazard Communication, Respiratory Protection, Lock- Out/Tag -Out, and Waste Handling. RUST completed SARA Title III and air pollution emission reporting required by the state. Confidential Conducting air monitoring for proprietary compound at eight plants, on a quarterly Nationwide $280,000 basis. Through the 2nd quarter, over 1200 samples will have been collected and analyzed. Project involves very low exposure limits and requires extreme care to Berkowitz prevent positive bias due to sample contamination. Locations nationwide. Waste Management of N.A. Evaluated exposure to hexavalent chromium to welders that service a woodwork tub CA grinder. Implemented engineering controls to reduce exposure to an acceptable level. Calhoun Hoechst Celanese Provided full -time industrial hygiene service on -site. Performed assignments, Sc $100,000 conducted assessment of tasks associated with assignments, assisted with the development of sampling strategy and scheduling of sampling, conducted IH Dorman monitoring, evaluated data, generated reports. Long Beach Naval Shipyard Conducted baseline industrial hygiene study of fully integrated naval shipyard. Over CA $175,000 4000 samples collected and analysed. Data recorded in personal computer database for detailed analysis. Fielded a team of 10 industrial hygienists and Downs technicians for a six month campaign. ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type : IH Survey Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Van Waters and Rogers Provided contract industrial hygiene service on an "on -call" basis for a national Nationwide $30,000 chemical manufacturer/transporter at numerous facilities nationwide. Products sampled involved formalintformaldehyde, various organic solvents and acids. Florence Unique challenges presented during this project were rapid response and sample turnaround requirements. Consulting was also provided regarding the handling of suspected carcinogens and transfer from bulk containers into laboratory size packaging. Cargill/North Star Steel Performed lead and cadmium sample collection on numerous occasions for Nationwide $30,000 national mini -steel mill client. Full shift -all shift samples were collected for evaluation of compliance to OSHA lead and cadmium standards. Florence Confidential Evaluation of employee exposure to organic vapors during degreasing operations at AL a manufacturing facility. Work practice and local exhaust ventilation recommendations resulted in achieving compliance with the OSHA PEL for Harris trichloroethylene. A -Mold, Inc. Collected air samples and quality control blanks which were sent to an accredited OH $6,200 laboratory for analysis. Facility conducted die -cast operations and used a graphite -based lubricant in the dies. Samples for determination of worker exposure Hendrickson were collected during three shift operation and for each job position. RUST presented the client with a report detailing the methods used, laboratory analytical results, and conclusions relating the findings to OSHA requirements. Medtronic, Inc Industrial Hygiene Surveys- Determine initial strategy. Conduct sampling, prepare Nationwide $57,000 report with recommendations re: hazard control, regulatory compliance, long -term sampling strategy. IAQ- Conduct sampling and prepare reports for Korpela investigations;both complaint based and pre- occupancy baseline. Training- Conduct hazard communication, ETO, respirator training. Audit - Compliance and an ETO specific audit. 'L I ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type: IH Survey Industrial Hygiene & Safety Protect Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Apple Computer IH services included: air sampling for lead particulate, methanol, isopropanol, CO ethanol; development and implementation of an Employee RTK program; Hazard Communication and respirator training; internal health and safety training; Ledbetter assistance with the development of a lockouthagout program. Northwest Airlines Provided extensive industrial hygiene monitoring services for various contaminants MN $20,000 throughout aircraft stripping, preparation, priming and painting. Other projects for this client have included an advanced composite shop evaluation, noise surveys and Russell indoor air quality assessments to name a few. Peoples Gas Light Evaluated employee exposure to 3 pipeline products to determine exposure to coal IL $15,000 tar pitch volatiles, Methy Ethyl Ketone (MEK), Methylene bispheryl isocyanate (MDI) Toluene - disocyanate (TDI). Sampling was perfomed in conjuction with NIOSH. The Vlkaitis study findings consisted of modification to work practices, respiratory protection and product substitute. General Electric Directed all plant health and safety activities at 2000 employee plant which SC $275,000 manufacturers gas turbines. Activities included industrial hygiene monitoring, HAZCOM training, safety program development (cranes, confined spaces, lock -out- Woodson tag -out), management/supervisor H & S training, and development of safety observer audit program. Reduced OSHA recordable rate from 18% to 12 %. Recently completed third year on this project. First 2 1/2 years,was on -site 100 °h of the time,now continuing to support G.E. on an as- needed basis (training, OSHA inspections, etc). ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCT[IRE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles E—rojectType: IH &S Audits /Pro .Mgr. Name Description Location Cost FMunicipal spital Managed a facility -wide biosafety assessment at a municipal hospital facility aJs?rftte NY of an infectious waste incineration upgrade project. Actiities included the eval of existing infectious waste handling procedures through document reviews anBrown Inenerated audits and comparison to a number of regulatory agency requirements. A swas developed to measure the amounts of various types of infectious durina various operations. Confidential Conducted IH &S audit of corn milling and refining plant. Identified over 75 potential TN $15,000 violations. Downs Confidential Conducted IH &S audit as part of a larger environmental audit team of medical waste Nationwide $50,000 incinerator operations. Evaluated compliance with bloodborne pathogen standard, Downs ventilation systems, physical safety issues, recordkeeping. Confidential Conducted environmental health and safety audit of electronics manufacturing MN $9,000 operations, 4 locations. Managed team including environmental engineers and Downs industrial hygienists. Confidential OSHA compliance audit, extensive evaluation of employee exposure to airborne VA $30,000 chemicals and health and safety program assistance in a large power transformer Harris manufacturing facility. Work practice review and recommedations resulted in significant reduction in worker exposure. ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type : Indoor Air Quality Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Current, Inc. Employee complaints of exhaust type odors initiated an evaluation of indoor air CO quality. Temperature and humidity measurements were conducted and carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide levels were determined. The ventilation system was evaluated by measurements and inspection for potential contaminant sources. Recommendations for improvements were developed. Unclay Management Corp. Health related problems including respiratory ailments, odors, eye irritation and CO dizziness were experiences by occupants of a downtown office building. RUST conducted an investigation including a through inspection of the building, HVAC system, and ventilation for an underground parking garage under the building. A health questionaire was administered to the building occupants. Air samples were collected to assess formaldehyde exposure. GSA Conducted an indoor air quality survey, including evaluation of the ventilation system GA for effectiveness and contamination, monitoring the air for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds. Relative humidity and temperature were Cheatom measured and evaluated in comparison to ASHRAE guidelines. Confidential Conducted investigation of office building. Interviewed employees, conducted MN $8,000 employee communication meetings, inspected and evaluated HVAC system, collected air samples. Problem related to reorganization of floor space which Downs resulted in higher than recommeded occupancy level for one area. Changes to HVAC solved problem. Real Estate Company Conducted IAQ investigation of office in strip mail. Collected air samples at request MN $5,000 of client; nondetectable results; inspected HVAC, found bypass problem, fixed on site, problem solved. Downs Confidential Conducted an investigation of indoor air quality in a mixed office /manufacturing MN $20,000 building. Investigation included HVAC evaluation, occupant questionaire, medical consultation, air sampling. Documented crossover between office and Downs manufacuring HVAC systems, which was apparent problem Confidential Performed air emissions monitoring at an industrial facility and ambient air NY $50,000 monitoring at an adjacent primary school. Purpose of sampling was to identify chemical constituents and concentrations emitted from the industrial facility and Rafferty determine if those emissions were impacting the school facility. RINUENVIRONMENT & NFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Indoor Air Quality Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost H.B. Fuller & Co. Walkthrough with HVAC technician, examination of HVAC. Employee survey MN $2,500 administration and analysis. Review of construction blueprints, documents. Evaluation of carbon dioxide concentrations. Follow -up surveylndoor air quality Russell audit. Survey required development of written questionaire and development of a standard format for presenting survey results. RtMENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Industrial Ventilation Design Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Chem Waste Management Develop concept level dust control system design. Provide preliminary specifications WI $20,000 for dust control equipment. Complete detailed designs for dust control system. Blair Production Welding Shop Design a state of the art ventilation system for a medium sized job production shop MN $60,000 welding department. Design utilized a general exhaust and supply dilution system Braun coupled with two forms of local exhaust. The system featured a high efficiency filtration system and utilized recirculation. Metals Fabrication Control of dust from productions sanding of beryllium copper alloy. $2,600 Caplan Ceramics Mfg. Control of lead dust form manufacture of lead - titanium- zirconium ceramic products. $17,000 Caplan Metal extrusion Control dust & fume from large (5500 ton) extrusion press. $22,000 Caplan Secondary Copper Smelting Ventilation evaluation and design modifications to existing copper furnace canopy $4,500 hood. Caplan Foundry-Core Mfg. Detailed concept development and preliminary engineering for provision of clean, $12,000 tempered air (using evaporative cooling) to core making work stations for exposure Caplan control (formaldehyde, phenol, dust, silica). ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Project Type : Industrial Ventilation Design Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Munitions Mfg. Control of ethyl lactate and butyl alcohol while wrapping solid packet propellant with $14,498 tape. Knutson Munitions Mfg. Control of DEGDN (like nitro glycerine in extrusion press operations). Special $27,800 precaution for explosive nature of contaminant. Knutson Research Laboratory Design ventilation for laboratory in university. $10,000 Knutson Munitions Mfg. Control ethyl alcohol & ethyl ether vapors during production of smokeless power in a WV $28,155 cutting house. Knutson R�y �tK � ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUC URE Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles ii Project Type : Industrial Ventilation Design Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Cabinet Mfg. Formaldehyde control in production woodworking with particle board. Designed dust $4,600 collection, rework and upgrade existing fabric filter. Caplan Alloy Metals Mfg. Dust & fume collection at mill stands for bar & wire mill, high nickel alloys. Includes $58,800 experimental determination of particle size & water vapor content. Caplan Chemical Mfg. Control of dust from pesticide mfg. operation. Two dust collection systems & make AR $250,000 up air. Utilized & upgraded existing blowers, fabric filters. Caplan Ore crushing - openpit mine Control of dust in 20,000 TPD crushing plant that had been upgraded from 3500 Canada $125,000 TPD. Crowded, high speed heavily loaded belts, poor transfers. Aided in redesign transfers & belt skirts. Revised hoods & ducts for existing dust collector, 64,000 cfm. Caplan Plastics Cmpd. Control of dust in pilot plant operation. Exhaust & recirculation systems. Project Mass. $60,000 involved control of proprietary catalyst containing highly toxic component. Downs Waste Mangement Concept design for drum repackaging operation associated with hazardous waste $10,000 incinerator. Downs Aluminum Polishing Concept design for control of dust from high speed aluminum buffing machines. MN $8,000 Downs Chemical Mfg. Control of dust & vapor from herbicide mfg. operation. Bldg. modifications, 3 CA $80,000 exhaust systems, make -up air system, vacuum cleaning & pneumatic conveying system. Activated carbon absorber for odor control. Downs y �� ENVIRONMENT & �M� INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type: Industrial Ventilation Evaluation Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles Client/Proj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Easton Aluminum Process involved anodizing and coating of aluminum parts. Sampling was UT conducted to evaluate exposure and sources of emissions. Work practices were observed and process operations were evaluated to determine effect on exposures. Exhaust ventilation systems were evaluated to determine effectiveness and recomendations for improved efficiency were documented. Primary Lead Smelter Develop industrial hygiene strategy to evaluate lead exposure routes in a primary MT $175,000 lead sinter plant for the purpose of modification and improvement of existing engineering ventilation controls, modification of work practices and implementation Braun of administrative procedures. Perform engineering evaluation of existing engineering ventilation controls and develop design engineering modifications for im movement. Teflon Extrusion Process Detailed ventilation evaluation of large exhaust and dupply systems serving teflon $6,800 extrusion manufacturing plant. Caplan RUS�y �� ENVIRONMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE Project Type: Ionizing Radiation Industrial Hygiene & Safety Project Experience Profiles ClienUProj.Mgr. Name Description Location Cost Meridian Oil Client wished to survey external gamma and beta radiation exposure rates from TX equipment and soils at nearly 200 facilities in West Texas and New Mexico. RUST was contracted to perform the survey with Ludlum 3A and 97 -3 survey meters with sodium iodide crystals and Geiger - Mueller tubes . Data was recorded on field maps and a data base was developed to mane a over 5000 field readings. Public Service Company -Co Project involved the monitoring of radiation levels during maintance activities at a site CO where uranium mine tailings had been used as road bed and fill material. Radiation levels were monitored using a gamma radiation survey meter and dust levels were measured to evaluate alpha Particle hazard potential. Dept of Energy Responsible for coordination of health and safety activities during drilling a sampling CO operations at Rocky Flats plant. Activities include implementation of the worksite health and safety plan, radiological protection plans, performance of extensive Savko radiological and environmental monitoring to determine levels of protection and extent of contamination. ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE © 1993 RUST Environment d- Infrastructure Inc. Printed with soybean -based ink io