Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-03_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 3, 1995 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL OATH OF OFFICE - Glenn L. Smith (Council Member and HRA Commissioner) Dennis F. Maetzold (Council Member and HRA Commissioner) ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are.Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of ERA Meeting of December 19, 1994 II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 12/28/94 Total: $14,191.31 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO -TEM * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Council Meeting of November 29, 1994 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Reconsideration of Partial Release of Conservation Restriction - Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition * B. Set Hearing Date (02/06/95) 1. Final Development Plan, 5113 W. 50th St., CSM Investments. Generally located vest of Highway 100 and south of Vernon Avenue 2. Final Development Plan, Valvoline Rapid Oil Change, 4530 France Avenue South. Generally located vest of France Avenue and south of Sunnyside Road III. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Bituminous Distributor with Hydrostatic Drive IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Draft Resolution - Dimler Amendment (M.S. 171.12, Subd. 6) B. Policy Statement - Traffic Safety Issues * C. Contract - IAFF #1275 Agenda Edina City Council January 3, 1995 Page tvo V. RESOLUTIONS A. Designation of Director /Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority B. Designation of Director /Alternate Director of LOGIS C. Designation of Official Newspaper D. Signatory Resolution E. Facsimile Signature Resolution F. Official Depositories Resolution G. Official Depositories Resolution - National City Bank VI. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition for Street Lighting - Doncaster Way and Best 56th Street VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 12/28/94 Total: $385,112.80 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Jan 16 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Jan 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Sat Jan 21 Council Study Session - Edina Fire 8:30 A.M. Arneson Acres Pk Department 1992 -94 Study Wed Jan 25 MLC Board Meeting /Legislative Dinner 4:30 P.M. Decathlon Club Mon Feb 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Feb 20 PRESIDENTS' DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Feb 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 19, 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioner Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards. Commissioner Kelly entered the meeting at 7:03 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus to approve the HRA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF BRA MEETING OF DECEMBER 5. 1994, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice to approve the ERA Minutes of December 5, 1994, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the HRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 14, 1994, and consisting of one page totaling $10,044.00. Commissioner Rice seconded the motion. �ollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:43:34 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 01/03/95 $24.64 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 1220 /HRA GRANDVIEW MISC 012672 $24.64* 01/03/95 $14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR CO HRA BOND PAYMENT JAN 1995 EDINBOROUGH LOAN TO OTH FU 012673 $14,166.67* $14,191.31 . MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 29, 1994 AT 7:00 P.M. ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:07 P.M. TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC EFARING HELD FOR PROPOSED 1995 CITY BUDGET Pursuant to published notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the proposed property tax increase in the 1995 Budget for the City of Edina, as mandated by Chapter 375, Laws of Minnesota 1993. Mayor Richards stated that the hearing would focus on the proposed 1995 City of Edina Budget relative to where the monies come from and how they are expended on the various functions of the City. Residents with questions about the market value of their homes should appear at the Board of Review which will meet in the month of April, 1995. Mayor Richards explained that the tax rate structure on residential property is determined by the state legislature. He said that the City's final property tax levy and final budget must be adopted at a subsequent hearing and citizen input is important in that process. _ Mayor Richards explained that the budget process began in the month of July with a series of meetings at which budget assumptions were formulated and then the Council directed staff to ,come back with a detailed draft budget broken down by departments. He told the audience that the proposed 1995 Budget totals $15,723,228 which represents an increase of $660,927 or 4.398 over the Budget for 1994. Mayor Richards then opened the hearing for public comment and discussion. Public Comment Lincoln B. Shea, 4815 Lakeview Drive, said he had received his estimate of proposed tax increase based on the state's estimate of income increase of 4.58 for the year. Therefore, the City has felt justified in increasing its budget accordingly which has nothing to do with the services received as a taxpayer. He asked for justification for the proposed 4.398 increase in expenditures. Mayor Richards responded that in considering the proposed 1995 Budget the Council was not motivated by the state's estimate of income increase. He explained the reasons for the following major increases in expenditures: 1. Wage adjustment of 2.58 2. $10.00 per month increase in employee health insurance package 3. $30,000 additional clerical position - Police Department 4. $35,000 crime prevention specialist 5. $40,000 additional Park maintenance position Concerning revenue sources, Mayor Richards said the major components are 70.38 from real estate taxes, 9.78 from intergovernmental aids, 8.38 from fees and charges, and 5.98 from licenses and permits. Mr. Shea also questioned what the City employees contribute to their benefit package, the line item for Police Department computer contract and the additional clerical position. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that the person on family coverage pays approximately $160.00 per month, single employee coverage is paid entirely by the City. Chief Bernhjelm explained that in 1990 -91 the City entered into a contract with a computer company for computerized dispatch which serves the Police and Fire Departments. The company holding the contract was bought out and due to that renegotiated situation there is an approximately $9,000.00 increase in the contract price. Because of the buyout, the City anticipates a greater level of service because the buyout company will be improving the software for the system. Regarding the additional clerical position, Chief Bernhjelm said he now has police officers and investigators who are typing reports. The more officers put on the road the less the response times. Mayor Richards interjected that the crime prevention specialist position will be fully funded by the Edina Crime Fund and the School District will pay $40,000 of the cost of the Police School Liaison Officer position. Frances Shea, 4815 Lakeview Drive, questioned the $75,000 increase in workers' compensation insurance and asked if the City has a program for preventing injuries. Assistant to Manager Smith responded that the increase is due to some major losses in the area of public safety - one of which was the death of a Police Officer and several heart attacks. Ms. Smith said the City does have a program in which the losses are studied followed by the insurance company working with the various departments. In addition, a wellness program will be instituted in January which is designed to reduce losses. In the past the City has had some outstanding good years with $898,000 in returned premiums. The City receives risk management services through its insurer, the St. Paul Companies. No further public comment being offered, Mayor Richards commented--that, although citizen input at this hearing was minimal, he felt the community is involved and aware of how the City operates. Member Smith made a motion to close the public hearing on the proposed 1995 City Budget and that adoption be on the Council Agenda for December 5, 1994. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 7:40 P.M. City Clerk r� L FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Info /Background: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Kenneth Rosland Craig Larsen January 3, 1995 Partial Release of Conservation Restriction, Lot 4. Block 1. Mark Dalauist Addition, Ron Clark construction , Agenda Item # ILA Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ x1 Action ❑x ❑ El Consent To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion The proposed release area is unchanged ' from the proposal considered by the Council on November 7, 1994. November 16, 1994 Mayor Richards and City Council c/o Mr. Craig Larsen City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 - -- Re: Partial Vacation of Conservation Easement Lot 4, Harold Woods Lane Dear Mayor Richards and City Council Members: sO M CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7500 West 78th Street Edina, Minnesota 55439 (612) 947 -3000 fax(612)947 -3030 This letter is to request reconsideration of the action taken by the City Council on November 7, 1994 pertaining to the subject matter. For your reconsideration and to further support my request, enclosed is a drawing of our client's proposed house on Lot 4 which shows protrusions into the 100 feet conservation easement as follows: On -grade patio area 185 square feet Elevated wood deck area 320 square feet Roofed area 185 square feet Total 690 square feet Please consider the following: 1. The total lot #4 area per the zoning ordinance is 33,501 square feet. 2. I dedicated to the city the conservation easement totaling 21,500 square feet which is 64% of the lot as conservation area. 3. My request to release 690 square feet represents 3.2% of the conservation area. The client, the architect and I have worked hard designing and re- designing " this house incorporating very unusual shapes and angles attempting to fit it within the buildable area. The house elements that are now in the conservation area are very minimal and do not adversely impact or affect the purpose of the conservation easement. Please consider scheduling this matter on the city council agenda as soon as possible. Si cernely/, Ronald E. Clark REC /cw Enclosure Designer/ Builder/ Developer MN Builder License #0001220 facts; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that this Council does hereby declare the blacic lab named Maggie at 5239 West Highwood Drive to be a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 347. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Aves: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith. Richards Resolution adopted. *YEAR END COUNCIL MHETING-DATE SET FOR DECEMBER 29. 1994 Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith setting December 29, 1994, at 5:00 P.M. as the Year End Council Meeting date. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER REQUEST (BETWEEN 4608 AND 4500 LAKEVIEV DRIVE) REFERRED TO ENGINEERING FOR PROCESSING notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition for permanent street -urfacing with curb and gutter between 4608 and 4500 Lakeview Drive to the r-- veering Department for processing. .lotion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 4 NARg DA14UIST ADDITION `"avor Richards stated chat the request to reconsider the partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Mark Dalquisc Addition - ^.fore the Council because of information since the last meeting. Attorney ..:an has advised that prior Council practice has been to not reconsider a :ion unless a Council Member who voted with the prevailing side moves for the reconsideration and this motion is approved by the Council. Member Smith made a motion to reconsider the request for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Mark Dalquist Addition, and that the matter be placed on the December 4, 1994, Council Agenda to set a hearing date. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. W - -ber Smith stated that at the of November 7, 1994, just prior to the to on this request, it was ir:c:_.__... :at the percentage of the proposed protrusion: into the conservation restriction was approximately three percent. Not having thought that through, and on further investigation by asking Mr. Clark directly, Member Smith said he learned that the hard wall release Mr. Clark was looking for was .89 percent of the entire 21.500 square feet of the conservation easement. Member Smith explained that he thought he was dealing with three percent of a building and on that basis he suggested that the Council review this in light of the ocher three undeveloped lots in the subdivision. Mayor Richards then called for voce on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Richards �EBN OF RESIDENTS Mayor Richards noted that Howard Thompson had requested to an the Council Agenda to voice a concern. Because Mr. Thompson was not present no concern was heard. Rudv Christianson, 7500 York Avenue South, asked if consideration has been given to resurfacing Xerxes Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street on the east side of Southdale. VACANC OT= ON VARIOUS ANK BOARDS AND CO WEV-r= Assistant Manager Hughes advised the Council that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AHK) has announced vacancies on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Board of MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 7, 1994 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED ?lotion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes:- Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. RNESOTA D -DAY PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith ~ unanimously animously for adoption of a Proclamation naming Thursday. November 17, _794, as Minnesota D -Day (no smoking) in the City of Edina. Matthew Peterson and Douglas Lambert, Chair and Member respectively of the Community Health Services Advisory Committee, accepted the proclamation along with sixth grade students, Elizabeth Youngblood (Southview School) and Andy Bertram (Valley View School). Thanks were extended to Tom Winn of FastFrame, Diana Hedges, Edina Art Center Director, and Pam Hermanson of the Edina Middle School for their efforts with the anti- tobacco poster project. RP ^ ^'ATION OF APPRECIATION - FAIRVrM FOUNDATION Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously recognizing the Fairview Foundation as benefactor and expressing appreciation for its interest and contribution in sponsoring and promoting a healthier lifestyle for both students and adults whose lives are touched by the Anti- Tobacco Poster Project. Mark. Enger, accepted the resolution on behalf of the Fairview Foundation. MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously for adoption of a Proclamation declaring November 10 - 18, 1994, as Minnesota Chemical Health Week in Minnesota. Kathy "-arson, Edina Chemical Awareness Committee Coordinator, accepted the ::amation on behalf of the Committee and presented each Council Member with a yea ribbon as a symbol of individual and community efforts to reduce the demand for drugs in the Edina community. *MNUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 17 1994 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 17, 1994. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 4 BLOCK lm MARY DAIOUIST ADDITION DENIED Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen recalled that at its meeting of September 7, 1994, the Council continued the public hearing on the application for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition to allow the proponent time to come back with a redesigned proposed home. He advised that Ron Clark, proponent, has returned with a proposal reflecting the exact footprint of a home proposed for Lot 4. The release would affect only those areas under the footprint of the dwelling. The proposed conservation restriction release for Lot 5 has been withdrawn by the proponent. Planner Larsen explained that the Findings have been revised to reflect comments by the Council at the September 7, 1994, Council hearing. The draft Findings contain two Decisions. The first Decision would deny the application for release of 19 feet of the Conservation Restriction on Lot 4, and 23 feet of the Conservation Restriction on Lot 5. The second Decision would grant the release of portions of the Conservation Restriction within the footprint area of the dwelling on Lot 4 as legally described in Exhibit A of the Findings. Presentation by Developer Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, introduced the proposed homeowner, Diane Dolginow and Michael Sharratt, the project architect. He presented a graphic illustrating the footprint presented on September 7, 1994, with an overlay of the new revised home footprint drawn to exact scale. Mr. Clark pointed out that on the revised footprint the home has been pulled back to 90 feet from the ordinary high water and the deck areas have been recessed into the home. He presented the following comparative of the previous home versus the new proposed home: Previous Proposed Interior heated space to within 81' of wetlands 450 SF Interior heated space to within 92' of wetlands 185 SF Elevated wood deck to within 81' of wetlands 240 SF Elevated wood deck to within 90' of wetlands 320 SF On grade patio (none shown on previous proposal) 0 SF On grade patio to within 90' of wetlands 185 SF Mr. Clark noted that most of the construction in the easement area constitutes on -grade patio and open deck. In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Clark answered that the proposed home would have 3,045 square feet on the first floor and would be a rambler with a full basement level walkout. The elevation from street level would be approximately 23 feet. Member Smith asked for clarification on the enclosed areas that would encroach on the conservation restriction. Mr. Clark pointed out that only about half of the two enclosed bays would encroach on the easement. Public Comment Ed Glickman, 5217 Schaefer Road, said he was opposed to the proposed plan and procedure. He said the Council is faced with a simple decision - should the City give away a valuable conservation easement, required by City ordinances, solely because the buyer of a one million dollar 6,000 square foot home wants two separate decks, a patio and an additional 185 square feet. He submitted that both the developer and buyer knew the lot restrictions before the proposed home was designed. Mr. Glickman said that the Findings state that construction of a home consistent with the neighborhood is not possible without the release of the conservation easement. Also, the conservation easement presents a functional building which would be in keeping with the size and scale of existing dwellings in the neighborhood. Further, denial of the release will adversely impact the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. He stated that none of these reasons stands the test of logic. The developer and architect have just shown that a 6,000 square foot functional home could be built on this lot that does not encroach on the conservation easement. As alternatives-, Mr. Glickman submitted: 1) that the home be decreased in size by three percent which would not require release of the conservation easement, or 2) consideration be given to side deck placement, or 3) why not consider placing this home on one of the three remaining lots which are substantially larger. Failing all this, he suggested that Mr. Clark carve the subdivision into three lots rather than four. Finally, the Findings also include a statement that the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan are served by releasing this conservation easement. He noted that in the Comprehensive Plan it states that the City must protect and manage wetlands for stormwater retention areas, wildlife areas, amenities and lessen the impacts of nutrients and sediment input. Mr. Glickman reminded Council of the letter from the DNR two years ago in which it was stated that the property in question lies in an environmentally sensitive area and involves significant wetland and floodplain encroachment issues. The DNR was concerned about the effect of stormwater runoff on water quality of the wetlands. He presented recent photos showing a historic high water level on Mirror Lakes with 20" trees under water. He attributed this to an extraordinary amount of development which has gone on in the surrounding area. Mr. Glickman urged the Council not to give away an important conservation easement. Ted Pier, 5021 Ridge Road, asked the Council to provide and enforce a single, consistent law to all residents and citizens of Edina. He said that when Mr. Clark submitted his plan for subdivision of this property a stipulation of the Council was that there be no variances from the City's own regulations. Mr. Pier said the wording has been changed to make it appear that this is not a variance but a release of a conservation easement. Records leading to the decision to grant approval of the subdivision indicate that the issues raised dealt - ecifically with the conservation easement. It was the Council's judgement at time that no alterations should be allowed for this developer or for any of -her neighbors. He said that the Council should give the same consideration to this request for variance as was given to area neighbors when they applied for variances in the past and were denied. Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, stated she opposed granting a variance for any building in this subdivision. She said when they proposed to add a screen porch they were told that they could not ask for a variance and therefore redesigned it to comply with City regulations. She referred to the history of this subdivision -he agreement that there would be no variances. Ms. Robinson said she •!ed Mr. Clark should be held responsible for his mistake and stay within the guiaeiines of the City instead of hoping to break the code and use this possibly as a precedent for future lot development in the area. If Council wants to look at the option of a 50 feet conservation easement, she suggested that the Council call a moratorium and set a public hearing on the issue, but as the law stands now, it is 100 feet. Helen McClelland, 5717 Continental Drive, explained the rationale used by the Planning Commission in considering variances by relating briefly three previous imilar variance proposals that were denied. Because Mr. Clark is a professional developer and is aware of the laws regarding the development process, both the state and local rules, a plea of hardship would clearly be self- imposed. A comment following a Planning Commission meeting that the Dalquist Addition was again before the Council raised some concern and three Commission members attended the Council meeting of September 19, 1994. Ms. McClelland said their concern was that issues are presented to the Planning Commission in one way and to Council in another. She recalled that from May to December 1992, Mr. Clark was closely questioned by members of the Planning Commission about his plans for this site. He answered that any construction would have to maintain whatever conservation easement was granted to the lot and would have to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. At the meeting of October 29, 1992, a straw vote of the Planning Commission indicated that a one plus three lot subdivision was favored (5 to 2 vote). A subsequent poll by the Planning Commission for a four lot subdivision with no variances was seven to zero. When Mr. Clark returned at the December, 1992, Planning Commission meeting he presented a one plus four lot subdivision that was accomplished by moving the storm sewer line. At that meeting Mr. Clark was questioned extensively about whether there would be the need for variances and it was made clear that the Commission was giving consideration to the proposed subdivision without variances. The vote by the Planning Commission was eight to three for the one plus four lot subdivision with no variances. Ms. McClelland concluded that the Planning Commission does have concern that Mr. Clark is now asking for a variance to the conservation restriction. Patrick Mantvh, 6413 Interlachen Boulevard, said he would like to reiterate what his neighbors and the Planning Commission member have just said. He stated that the neighbors have significant mistrust of what Mr. Clark says as he gave his word when the subdivision was approved that there would be no variances and everyone thought the matter was resolved. This issue is like a moving target as Mr. Clark has come back repeatedly with variance requests. Mr. Mantyh submitted that the land is not worthless without the variances as the lot is adequate to build a very large home. He asked that the laws be applied equally and fairly to all citizens of Edina and that the variance be denied. Corky Carlson, 5025 Ridge Road, said she was a new resident to Edina and urged that the rules and laws be followed. John MacNeil, 5017 Schaefer Road, told Council he was also speaking for his children that live at 5125 Schaefer Road. He said he wished the Council would make the decision,to stay with the City standards so that the residents not need keep coming back for the three additional lots that remain. Secondly, he questioned why the developer has never considered moving the home closer to the street. Thirdly, he voiced concern regarding the current level of the area lakes. He said something is wrong in that area as over the past several months the water is rising higher every week. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked Engineer Hoffman to comment on the lake level. He agreed that the water level in Mirror Lakes and the two ponds to the northwest is much higher than two years ago. They are landlocked so the water level cannot be pumped down. Staff has looked at them and the DNR has come out and said the water is two feet higher than normal even though nothing new has happened in that immediate area. Mr. Clark responded that they have worked very hard to reduce the size of the dwelling and as now proposed it would be 200 SF smaller than the previously proposed home. He told Council that the problem is that 64 percent of the buildable lot area is within the conservation easement. He reminded Council that the Department of Natural Resources guideline for pond setback is 50 feet - the proposed dwelling footprint would be at 90 feet. Mr. Clark said the development has been thoroughly engineered with the basement floors proposed at 942 feet above sea level to provide a safety factor from high water. In addition, they have paid for installation of an equalizing pipe between the two ponds with any overflow to drain into a catch basin by Schaefer Road. For emergency situations, a line has been installed over the hill towards Interlachen whereby water can be pumped into Mirror Lakes. Engineer Hoffman clarified that Mr. Clark was required to install a forced main as opposed to 'a gravity pipe. Further, that the two ponds within the proposed development have no bearing on the water level of Mirror Lakes. Lisa Finsness, 4530 Tower Street, said it is her understanding that lakes are connected, maybe not by human means, but are fed from underground. Council Comment /Action Member Paulus recalled difficult decisions on minute footages when she sat on the Planning Commission and served on the Board of Appeals. Variances may establish precedents and it is important that they not be granted easily. Variances are granted for a true hardship that is not self- induced. During the whole process with the Mark Dalquist Addition, she remembered the proponent stating that he could live with the terms. In her opinion, this is a question of economic c feasibility as she felt a house can go on that lot without any variances. With regard to the DNR guideline for• setback from ponds, the City does have the privilege of being more restrictive. Member Paulus said she could not support the requested release of the conservation restriction because she could see no hardship that was not self imposed. Member Smith said when he visited the site his understanding was that the proposed protrusion into the conservation restriction would be deck areas and not enclosed living space. He added that 185 SF interior space against a 6,000 SF" home does not make the case for the requested release. Decks would be more malleable than concrete patios or living space. Member Smith said in looking at the building footprint available he felt it could be done without any release. He said he did not recall voting on a square footage variance previously but on a request to release a band of the restriction which he did not support and had suggested if the developer needed a variance for a smaller part of the footprint to come back with it. Now, in addition to decks, the request is for part of the house with roof and foundation and he would have to say no to the proposal as r. se.nted. Member Rice said this is a situation that cries out for common sense and he would support the proposal. He asked what would be the infringement percentage of the footprint as proposed. Planner Larsen answered that the conservation easement is approximately 21,000 SF and this would be an encroachment of approximately three percent. Member Rice then made general comments as follows. Over the past many months while this subdivision was being considered a line has been drawn in the sand between the neighbors and the developer. Threats of going to court have been suggested. People have said there ought to be a book and whatever the book says should be done, with no exceptions. If that were the case, there would be no need for a Council and a Planning Commission. The Council is elected to ?xercise reasonable judgement and many have differences of opinion as is evident. t`. ^abet Rice said he believed the home as proposed would not be a detriment to the s. To hold Mr. community, the environment or to any naturally sensitive area Clark to 100 percent compliance, in his opinion, is not reasonable. What Mr. Clark is asking for is a release of portions of the conservation restriction that has been placed on the subdivision by the Council and is within the jurisdiction of the Council to release. Member Rice concluded that common sense says this is a reasonable proposal and he would support the request. Ron Clark commented that he was at a total loss as to the Council's intent when the previous request for release of the conservation restriction was denied. He believed his marching orders were to go back and finalize the plan, in keeping with the percentage of encroachment into the easement area by the previous footprint. Mr. Clark argued that the footprint now presented has much less encroachment. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly interjected that it was her understanding as well that Mr. Clark come back with a design footprint that would not encroach on the conservation easement except for decks and not heated areas. Member Smith said he thought it was made clear that the Council would look at some intrusion if it were for decks. Member Paulus made a motion to deny the request for partial release of the conservation restriction on Lot 4. Block 1, Dalquist Addition as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Nays: Rice Motion carried. *APPEAL OF BOARD OF "PEALS DECISION FOR 35 FOOT ANTENNA HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN NORTER —M-1 OIIADRANT OF HICHiAYS 169 AND 62 INTERSECTION RESOLVED By oITHDRAVAL OF VARIANCE REOVEST Motion vas made by Nembar Smith and 0000 '000e /000 1=1> 1-Z T -A� DATE: -� l< REVISION& (D CONSTRUCTION, INC I An F7-1 F7-1 FT k HAROSLD W OD L.E. KOLLMEYER, ARCHITECT, ID 4101 WASHBU- 11 AVENUE l,fT-KTVt' A D. I FKT r CITY OF EDINA In the Matter of the Application of Ron Clark Construction, Inc., to release a portion of a Conservation Restriction covering a portion of Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition 11RAPt FINDINGS, DECISION, AND REASONS The above entitled matter was heard before the Edina City Council on June 20, 1994, August 15, 1994, September 7, 1994, November 7, 1994, and January 3, 1995. Mr. Ron Clark, the President of Ron Clark Construction, Inc. ( "Proponent ") was present at all hearings. Mr. Tim Keane, attorney representing the Proponent, was present at the August hearing. Property owners in the vicinity of the request were also present at all hearings. The City Council having heard and reviewed all of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, his representative, property owners in the vicinity of the request and having heard and reviewed evidence and law adduced by the Proponent, his representative, City Staff, and property owners and 1 r being fully advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The subject Conservation Restriction was required by the City pursuant to Section 810.13, Subd. 2. of the City Code, (the "Subdivision Ordinance "). The Conservation Restriction, dated May 14, 1993, was placed of record with the Hennepin County Recorder as document number 6167713. The Conservation Restriction was acquired by the City pursuant to the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 2. Section 810.13, Subd. 2. of the City Code provides as follows: Subd. 2 Lands Adjoining Lakes, Ponds or Streams. Where any plat or subdivision adjoins a natural lake, pond, or stream, including streams which flow only intermittently, a strip of land running along all sides which are contiguous to such lake, pond or stream, which strip shall extend from a line 100 feet upland from the lake or pond, as measured from the ordinary high water mark, and 100 feet from the centerline of the stream, shall be either (i) dedicated to the City for public use, or (ii) subjected to a perpetual easement in favor of the City over and in said 2 land and the bed and water body of such lake, pond or stream, for the purpose of protecting the hydraulic efficiency and the natural character and beauty of such lake, pond or stream. The Commission shall determine which of these options. is more appropriate and shall recommend to the Council one of said options. In either case there shall also then be granted to the City the right of ingress and egress from the said strip of land with workers, equipment, and material. Also, where the easement is determined to be in the best interest of the City, said easement shall also provide that the owners of the areas as to which such easement is granted shall not make, do or place any fill, grading, improvement or development of any kind on or to such easement area, or raise the level of the easement area in any way, but all such right to fill, grade, improve and develop, and to raise the level of the easement area, shall be granted by said easement to the City. 3. The Conservation Restriction does not allow buildings or other structures within the area proposed to be released from the Conservation Restriction without "the express prior written approval" of the City. The Conservation Restriction provides that it may be released at any time or from time to time by the sole act of the City. 4. The subject properties have the following dimensions and area, measured 3 Lot 4 pursuant to Section 850 of the City Code (the "Zoning Ordinance "). Lot Width 195 Feet Lot Depth 170 Feet Lot Area 33,501 S.F. 5. The Zoning Ordinance requires a �ont street setback of 30 feet. The buildable area between the aback line and the Conservation Restriction line establishes the buildable depth for a lot. On Lot 4, the depth varies from approximately 25 feet on the westerly side to 60 feet on the easterly side of the lot. 6. The proponent, on May 18, 1994, submitted a request to release 50 feet of the Conservation Restriction affecting Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition. A public hearing date of June 20, 1994, was set for the City Council to consider . tiiquest. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun - Current on June 1, and June 8, 1994. A mailed notice of the public hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the property on June 9, 1994. Notice of the public hearing was posted at the three (3) official City bulletin boards on June 10, 1994. The Proponent was present at the hearing. Interested residents were also present at the hearing. The City Council, after hearing the testimony of the Proponent and residents, voted to deny the al 0 requested release. 7. The Proponent on July 13, 1994, submitted a new request to release lesser portions of the Conservation Restriction, this time affecting only Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition. The proposed release would remove the most upland 19 feet of the Conservation Restriction affecting Lot 4, and the most upland 23 feet of the Conservation Restriction affecting Lot 5. 8. On August 15, 1994, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the July 13 request to release portions of the Conservation Restriction. Notice of the hearing was published in the Edina Sun Current on July 27, 1994, and on August 3, 1994. Notice of the public hearing was also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. On July 28, 1994, notice of the public hearing was also posted at each of the three (3) official City bulletin boards. The Proponent, and his attorney testified, using presentation boards, that the requested releases were necessary to construct homes that were consistent with the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Several property owners in the vicinity of the subject property testified in opposition to the requested releases. The property owners also submitted documents indicating their intent to challenge City approval of 67 the requested release in District Court. The Proponent agreed after questions and comments by the Council, that the requested release was in excess of the area necessary to construct dwellings in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. The meeting was continued to September 7, 1994, and staff was ordered to prepare Findings and Reasons to support a decision to approve a partial release of the Conservation Restriction. 9. On September 7, 1994, the City Council again considered the request to release a portion of the Conservation Restriction. After receiving the draft Findings, Decision, and Reasons prepared by staff, and after hearing testimony by the Proponent and residents, continued the hearing to the November 7, 1994, City Council meeting. 10. On November 7, 1994, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider a request to release a portion of the Conservation Restriction affecting only Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition. The Proponent, using a presentation board, described a request which would release approximately 690 square feet of the total area subject to the Conservation Restriction. Property owners in the vicinity of the request were present and testified in opposition to the proposed release. The City Council, after hearing the testimony of the Proponent and residents, [. voted to deny the requested release. 11. At the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of November 21, 1994, Councilmember Smith, moved to reconsider the action taken at the November 7, 1994, Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Kelly and was passed four votes to one. 12. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ( "DNR ") has established guidelines for building setbacks for various waterbodies. The recommended setback for the subject ponds is 50 feet for all buildings and structures. 13. The Environmental Protection Element of the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan contains the following objective and policies: Objective: Protect and manage lakes, ponds and wetlands for storm water retention areas, wildlife areas, and amenity areas, and lessen impacts from nutrient and sediment input. Policies: Utilize waterbodies and man -made ponding areas for the retention and detention of storm water to reduce flooding potentials and stabilize lake and pond levels. 7 Restrict encroachments below the ordinary high water marks of Type 3,4, and 5 wetlands. Require the dedication of or the grant of a scenic and open space easement over all land adjacent to and 100 feet upland of naturally occurring lakes and ponds in conjunction with the subdivision or development of the property. Require the dedication of or the grant of a scenic easement over Type 3, 4, and 5 wetlands in conjunction with the subdivision or dedication of property. Encourage owners of property riparian to lakes and ponds to maintain emergent aquatic vegetation and shoreline vegetation for filtering and wildlife benefits. 14. The City is authorized by the terms of the Conservation Restriction and Minnesota Statutes, Section 84.65, to release portions of the Conservation Restriction. The Conservation Restriction does not grant to the City any right to use or improve the area subject to the Conservation Restriction or permit the public to use or improve the area subject to the Conservation Restriction. The City is only authorized to enter onto the area subject to the Conservation Restriction to enforce the terms of the Conservation Restriction. The release of the Conservation Restriction is not governed by the provision of Minnesota law dealing E:3 with the vacation of publicly owned easements and rights of way. The release of the Conservation Restriction does not constitute a variance under the Subdivision Ordinance or the Zoning Ordinance. THEREFORE, based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the City Council does hereby make the following DECISION: The application for release of portions of the Conservation Restriction within the footprint area of the dwelling as legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto on Lot 4, Block 1, Mark Dalquist Addition is hereby granted. The decision is made for the following REASONS: A. The area subject to the Conservation Restriction following the release is of a sufficient size and subject to the restrictions necessary to meet the objective of the Environmental Protection Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The 25 foot "Natural Condition" Conservation Restriction area will not be altered by 9 the proposed release and will continue to provide wildlife habitat and filtering of storm water run off. The areas released from the Conservation Restriction have not been maintained in a natural condition, but have been maintained and mowed as open lawn /yard area by the previous property owner. B. The remaining area subject to the Conservation Restriction will provide for building setbacks from the pond which will exceed setbacks recommended by the DNR. C. The proposed release will not adversely impact the existing character and symmetry of the neighborhood but promotes good planning and orderly development of the subject lots. The proposed release will allow the construction of a new dwelling that will be consistent with the size and scale of the existing dwellings in the neighborhood, which would not be possible without the proposed release. The present area subject to the Conservation Restriction provides a buildable area which is too shallow to design and build a functional dwelling which would be in keeping with the size and scale of existing dwellings in the neighborhood. 10 4 Edward W. Glickman 5217 Schaefer Road Edina, MN 55436.1145 *Telephone: 612.935.0625 • Modem: 612.935.0210 •E -Mail: Glickman @MR.Net December 30,1994 The Edina City Council Edina City Council Offices 480150th Street West Edina, MN 55424 Re: Dalquist Subdivision Dear City Council: I oppose release of the conservation easement to Mr. Clark because it sets a bad precedent, is unfair, has no public purpose or reason and is offered in bad faith. Release of the conservation easement sets a public, permanent and dangerous precedent for future variance requests on all land adjoining water. If this proposal passes, Edina will go on public record as favoring the release of conservation easements solely for economic reasons to speed the sale of undeveloped property. This release will become a large green light to all future developers who own slowly selling lots to request variances to increase their profits by making their lots more attractive and marketable. At the same time, this release will diminish the city's natural assets in water with all of its benefits of flood control, water purification, wildlife and scenery. It also hurts surrounding home owner's property values and the city itself because of the loss of these benefits. Edina is blessed with many water resources that require the mandatory minimum conservation restriction. Therefore, the question is not if similar situations will present themselves in the future; but, when these problems will arise. First, there are 3 more lots in the Dalquist subdivision. If the Council grants this proposal it will be hard pressed to say no to future requests for variances within this subdivision. What will the Council do in 6 months when Mr. Clark comes back and asks for yet another 700 sq. ' release from Lot 3, ... and later on Lot 5,... and later on Lot 2? How can the Council say no to a variance on these other lots within the same subdivisions after it granted this one for this reason? 5 City Council December 30, 1994 Page 2 Next, there will be at least 10 lots on the soon to be subdivided Boos property that also has ponds on it less than 500' feet East of the lot in question. What will the Council do in 12 months when the developer of this property asks for a small 680 sq. ' release from each of these lots next to the pond? How can the city release the easement on the Dalquist Subdivision and not release it on the Boos Subdivision that is so close and so similar? There will also be at least 5 more lots on the Weiner property that is also less than 500' South of the lot in question and has water requiring the mandatory conservation easement. What will the Council do in 24 months when the developer asks for a small release on each of these lots? Therefore, a vote to release this particular conservation easement is effectively a vote to release all easements on water whenever development stalls. Release of the conservation easement for this developer and for these reasons is both unfair and a classic example of selective enforcement of the rules. Many other neighbors have lived by the variance rules and accepted them when they were enforced. Ted Pier and Betsy Robinson of 5021 Ridge Road wanted to build a screened in porch and were denied a variance of 5 ". Peggy Carlisle of 5013 Ridge Road wanted to enlarge her home and was denied a variance of a couple of feet. Patrick and Ingrid Mantyh of 6413 Interlachen wanted to add. another stall to their garage and were denied under similar circumstances. What is different between these situations and Mr. Clarks? How do you explain why individual homeowners got no relief for their property improvements and a commercial developer is rewarded handsomely? Does the City want to encourage new home building over homeowner improvements on existing homes? Unequal enforcement of the city's own ordinances causes public distrust and a lack of respect for authority from residents outside looking in and conflict within the city government itself. If this proposal is granted, it will cast a shadow on all of your prior decisions and complicate future deliberations. The Planning Commission opposes the release so strongly that it sent three of its members to the August 17, 1994; November 7, 1994 and presumably January 3, 1995 hearings on this matter. For example, Planning Commissioner, Helen McClelland, at the November 7, 1994 hearing on this matter testified that the Planning Commission unanimously voted on,two different occasions that the development go through without any exceptions to the existing ordinances. If the Council releases the easement at this point it will undermine its own advisory board and make coherent rule enforcement difficult. How can the council over rule two prior unanimous decisions of the Planning Commission? What has changed since the Council unanimously imposed the easement without comment or debate in January, 1993? 4. I* City Council December 30, 1994 Page 3 Setting up reasonable, known boundary's and carrying out the consequences of crossing them is the primary function of government. As such, a vote to release the easement violates this function and belittles the Council because it unnecessarily invites costly negative public response and insults its own advisory board. There is no reason whatsoever to grant the release and no possible public purpose served by reducing the conservation easement. Edina Codes, law on this subject and common sense all dictate that there must be a reason that serves a public purpose for the release of a valuable easement without consideration. The Council does not meet to maximize Mr. Clark's profit or speed his sales. Neither does it meet to cater to the Doglinow's design plans. Mr. Clark's reason for requesting the variance does not stand under examination. Self imposed economic hardship is not an excuse for a variance and should not be a precedent for release of an easement. The city code on this subject under the interpretation's section says the standards are minimums not to be tampered with. Mr. Clark's failure to sell may have to do with many things other than the size of the lots. For example, he may have mismarketed the lots by setting the price too high. He may be flying into the face of higher mortgage rates causing a bad market in general. Unlike the neighbors he has alternatives to encroaching on the easement. He could either lower his price or wait for more favorable market conditions. The Doglinow's reasons for wanting the release are equally thin. They also have alternatives. They could build a smaller home or build on a different lot that can accommodate their plan. In spite of this, they offer no justification for the release other than they "want" the 6,000 sq. foot home and two decks and a patio and part of the public easement. The citizens of Edina "need" the conservation easements specifically mandated in their Codes as minimums upheld as well. They need to know that the rules of the city will be applied equally and without preferential treatment. They also need to believe that their elected official represesentatives are. looking after the best interests of the community at large. If these opposing desires are put to test as they are here, the common good must be above the individual citizen. All one has to do is ask who will benefit from the release and it becomes quite evident that there is no possible justification for the request. Mr. Clark does not qualify for a favor and the city does not qualify to give him one because both Mr. Clark and Mr. Smith are acting in bad faith. December 30, 1994 City Council Page 4 There is a long standing axiom that those who seek equity must do equity. Sometimes this is called the "clean hands" doctrine. Mr. Clark is not innocently seeking relief. He is a seasoned and sophisticated commercial developer who was fully aware of the restrictions on the land long before he bought. Mr. Clark started his path of misdirection even before seeking relief from the rules. He brought a straw man into the development to buy an outlot first so this first lot would not be subject to the set back rules. In the next step of his plan, Mr. Clark misled the Planning Commission when seeking a variance from the set back rule when he said that he could build 4 houses on these lots. He misstated the facts several times at these meetings in October and December of 1992 when he told them that the lot sizes would be sufficient to build and sell. This was the issue all along in the seven Planning Commission meetings on the variance subject during the summer and fall of 1992. Mr. Clark misguided the City Council when he stated that he could build and sell 4 houses on these lots. This is the issue that the council has faced in 4 prior meetings during 1994. He told the Council that the homes would be 4,500 sq. feet now they are 6,000 sq. feet. First, Mr. Clark stated he needed a band of 50 foot release,... then 25 feet, ... then a foot print with a 1,200 sq. foot encroachment and finally now 680 sq. feet. A person is entitled to one mistake; however, a series of mistakes can lead to a different conclusion. Council Member Smith has equally questionable actions. Mr. Smith heard more than 1 hour of discussion and debate on this exact same matter with full opportunity for questions from all the parties that were present and voted to deny this proposal on the day before his election for Council and changed his vote less than 12 days after his reelection. His request for rehearing was approved even though his changed his vote on the measure would not have affected its passage. To pass this measure based upon the double "mistakes" of Mr. Clark and Mr. Smith defies logic and equitable principals. The proposal must fail because it is flawed, inequitable, baseless, contrary to city policy and ordinances, open ended and without qualification or restrictions to provide guidance in future situations. Res !tlly submitted, Edwarb4 lickman REQUEST FOR PURCHASE °".", TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA:- Kenneth - Rolland City Manager -- SUBJECT-:- REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000 DATE: 3 January, 1995 AGENDA ITEM I I I . A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Bituminous Oil Distributor Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Ruffridge Johnson, Inc. 1. $38,078.00. 2. Stepp Manufacturina 2. $52,145.00 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ruffridge Johnson, Inc. $38,078.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is to replace unit number 25.316, a 1969 Bituminous Oil Distributor. This unit is used to apply seal coat oil prior to placing the seal coat chips. This equipment purchase was re -bid as earlier bid was in the $52,000.00 area. This purchase will be funded thru the equipment replacement program. iZag qpl 9 e The Recommended bid is . Y within budget not Kenneth Ro /,F 1�����s- sf -rqr Wallin, Fiance Director d.- City A M REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council I Agenda Item # Iv A & B From: Francis Hoffman / Consent F7 City Engineer 59/ Information Only ❑ Date: 3 January, 1995 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Dimler Amendment ❑ To Council Repeal & Re- hearing Traffic Safety Items Action _I Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance Discussion RECOMMMMATION: Approve a resolution seeking repeal-of Dimler Amendment (MS 171.12 subd. 6) and discuss "Process" portion of each traffic safety request. BACKGROUND: The City Council directed staff to develop a resolution supporting repeal of the Dimler Amendment. (See attached proposed resolution.) Additionally, Council directed staff to develop additional policy language as it relates to the traffic safety process. The current process reads as follows: PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contracted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. Their recommendation will be shared with you and if you disagree with it or can bring forth additional facts you can appear at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting and present your viewpoint. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. This process was developed with the idea that staff would meet the day after the first council meeting of the month. The proposed language change would be to the last two sentences (in bold type) and add two additional sentences. A PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contracted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. "The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you and if you disagree with it or can bring forth additional facts, you can appear at the second council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interest parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the discretion of the City Council." RESOLUTION REPEALING DEMLER AMENDMENT WHEREAS, M.S. 171.12 Subd. 6, the Dimler Amendment, exempts a citation from a driver's record if the speeding offense is less than 10 MPH above the 55 MPH limit set by M.S. 169.14; and WHEREAS, although the Dimler Amendment does not apply to local streets, it may promote an attitude that speeding is condoned on all streets and roadways "within reasonable limits"; and WHEREAS, the mixture of vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists on local streets contributes to potentially dangerous conflicts involving speeding vehicles and WHEREAS, a uniform enforcement and penalty pattern is more likely to improve compliance on all roads ways including local streets; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The City of Edina supports legislation to repeal the Dimler Amendment. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES Agenda Item # N.C. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ DATE: JANUARY 3, 1995 I Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: CONTRACT' - IAFF #1275 Recommendation: 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve arbitration award and authorize execution of 1994 contract. hdo/Background: On September 30, 1994, representatives of the City and the International Association of Firefighters Local #1275 appeared before arbitrator Sharon Imes for the purpose of conducting a binding arbitration with respect to the 1994 contract. On December 22, 1994, the arbitration award was delivered to the City and the bargaining unit. The following are the elements of the award: WAGES The arbitrator awarded a 2 1/2 percent wage increase for all bargaining unit employees for 1994. SHIFT BIDDING The arbitrator amended our current contract as follows: "Senior Qualified Shift Employees shall be given shift preference after eighteen months of continuous full-time employment with this department." Based on this language, bargaining unit employees may select their preferred workshift on a seniority basis. This is similar to contract provisions which have existed for several years in the Police Department. HOLIDAYS Bargaining unit employees working a 24 hour shift presently receive five shifts off as floating holidays. The arbitrator awarded an additional floating holiday bringing the total to six. VACATION The arbitrator awarded an additional 1/2 day per year of vacation leave for bargaining unit employees working 24 hour shifts. Five additional issues were also the subject of the arbitration. These issues included; call back time, compensation for unused sick leave, longevity pay, compounding of overtime, and working out of classification. No changes to existing contract language were awarded by the arbitrator for any of these five issues. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the award and authorize execution of the 1994 contract with IAFF Local #1275. f� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS DESIGNATING DIRECTOR/ALTERNATE FOR SRA AND LOGIS AND DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Recommendation: Agenda Item # V • A • B • & C. Consent 11 Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1:1 To HRA nTo Council Action Motion aResolution Ordinance Discussion Adoption of resolutions designating Director /Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority and LOGIS, and designating official newspaper for 1995. Info/Background: Attached are copies of resolutions which the Council should approve at the first meeting in January each year. There have been no changes from the previous year. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: John C. Wallin is hereby designated to serve as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and Eric R. Anderson is hereby designated to serve as Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1995 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk w. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: John C. Wallin is hereby designated as a Director of LOGIS and Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated as Alternate Director of LOGIS, for the year 1995 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the City of Edina for the year 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk MINNESOTA SUN SUN PUBLICATIONS Sun•Current Sun•Post Sun•Sailor December 9, 1994 City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members: Please consider the Sun - Current as the city of Edina's official newspaper for the year 1995 at your January organizational meeting. The rate structure for legals effective January 1, 1995 will be: 1 column width: $1.02 per line - first insertion ($11.22 per inch) $0.51 per line - subsequent insertions ($5.61 per inch) 2 column width: $2.04 per line - first insertion ($22.44 per inch) $1.02 per line - subsequent insertions ($11.22 per inch) Notarized affidavits on each of your publications will be provided. Minnesota Sun Publications will accept legal notices on diskettes. We can translate files produced in a wide range of IBM- compatible PC and Macintosh word processing formats. (Please call Dianne Tomczik at 896 -4743 for more information.)As this represents as cost - effective and efficient method for us to produce the copy for publication, we will offer a 15% rate discount on all notices submitted on diskettes. We recommend that other municipal departments coordinate their legal notice publishing needs with the city clerk's office as well. All legal ads should be sent to our Bloomington office by Thursday noon preceding our Wednesday publications. In order to expedite our service to you, please direct your legals to the attention of Mendel Hedblom, Minnesota Sun Publications, 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN 55439. For your convenience our fax number is 896 -4754. Thank you for considering the Sun - Current as your official newspaper for the ensuing year. We are honored and pleased to serve you and look forward to a mutually beneficial working relationship with the city of Edina. Sin erely, Dona d W. Thurlow Publisher Bloomington Office: 7831 East Bush Lake Road .• Bloomington, MN 55439 • Ph: (612) 896 -4700 . TO: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: SIGNATORY RESOLUTION Recommendation: REPORPRECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # v . D . Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion M'Resolution ® Ordinance ® Discussion Adoption of signatory resolution authorizing the Mayor, Manager, and Treasurer of the City to act in the transaction of banking business. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year the Council should adopt a signatory resolution which authorizes persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City to act for the City in transaction of any banking business with the named banks. A copy of the recommended resolution is attached. SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First Bank National Association, Americana State Bank of Edina, Fidelity Bank, Norwest Bank Minnesota NA, Richfield Bank and Trust, Co. and National City Bank/Southdale Office (hereinafter referred to as the 'Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account if signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer or officers of the City, including the signer or signers of the check. ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk TO: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: FACSIMILE SIGNATURES RESOLUTION Recommendation: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V. E. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action ❑ ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 1:1 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adoption of resolution authorizing the use of facsimile signatures by public officials of the City of Edina. Info/Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year the Council should authorize the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager, and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders of public funds deposited with the City's banks. A copy of the recommended resolution is attached. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: FREDERICK S. RICHARDS - Mayor KENNETH E. ROSLAND - City Manager JOHN WALLIN - Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders -of public funds deposited in First Bank National Association, Americana State Bank of Edina, Fidelity Bank, Norwest Bank Minnesota NA, Richfield Bank and Trust, Co., and National City Bank/Southdale Office, be and hereby is approved, and that each of said persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, Marcella M. Daehn, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Edina, Hennepin County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of 'Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials" with the original thereof as recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council held on January 3, 1995, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original record, and that said Resolution was adopted by said City Council at said meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk TO: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: DEPOSITORIES FOR CITY FUNDS Recommendation: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V. F. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA F1 To Council Action F] Motion Resolution E] Ordinance 11 Discussion. Adoption of a resolution designating depositories for public funds of the City of Edina. Info/Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year the Council should designate official depositories for public funds of the City. A copy of the resolution is attached indicating the recommended depositories. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED that the First Bank National Association, Minneapolis, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, MN, Fidelity Bank, Edina, MN, Richfield Bank and Trust, Co., and Norwest Bank Minnesota NA, Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1996. ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk C i REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: KEN ROSLAND, Agenda Item # V. G. MANAGER Consent FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, Information Only CLERK Mgr. Recommends To HRA DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 M To Council SUBJECT: Action Motion DEPOSITORY RESOLUTION FOR NATIONAL CITY BANK El Resolution Ordinance E] Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of a resolution designating National City Bank as a depository for public funds of the City of Edina. Info /Backgr' ound: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year the Council should designate official depositories for public funds of the City. National City Bank is recommended as an additional depository. A copy of the resolution is attached indicating the recommended depository. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORY rr BE IT RESOLVED that the National City Bank /Southdale Office, Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as an Official Depository for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1996. ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of January, 1995. City Clerk /` . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: December 21, 1994 RE: Designation of National City Bank as Depository of City Funds At its meeting on January 3, 1995 the City Council will be requested to designate banks to act as the depositories of City funds for 1995. Councilmember Elect Maetzold is an officer of National City Bank /Southdale, which is one of the banks proposed for designation as a depository. The City is presently using National City Bank as a depository. Minnesota law contains an exception for the designation of banks as depository of public funds from the conflict of interest prohibition contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.87. This exception is contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.88, subdivisions 1 and 2, and permits the City to designate a bank in which a Councilmember is interested as a depository of City funds if the following conditions are met: 1. The interested Councilmember makes a disclosure that he is a director or employee of the bank and this disclosure is entered on the minutes of the Council meeting; 2. The disclosure is made when the bank is first designated as depository or when the Councilmember is elected, whichever is later; and 3. The designation of the bank as a depository is approved by unanimous vote. As noted above, the designation of the depository is required to be by unanimous vote. Since the language in the statute requiring a unanimous vote does not contain the additional phrase "by all members of the council" as is used in certain other instances in Minnesota law when referencing a vote by the Council (i.e. two - thirds vote of all members is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355 for approval of comprehensive plan amendments and is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.357 to approve a rezoning), I would interpret this provision to require a unanimous vote by all members voting on the question. DORSEY & WHITNEY A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESMONAu. ConmrtnnONS Therefore, I would recommend that when the question of designation of National City Bank as a depository is considered Councilmember Maetzold make a statement at that time disclosing his relationship with National City Bank then abstain from voting on the question. Because of the special requirements required to be followed in considering the designation of National City Bank as a depository, the City Council should consider this designation separately from the designation of other banks as depositories. JPG:cmn -2- DORSEY & WHITNEY A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ft REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MANAGER ROSLAND FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: PETITION FOR STREET LIGHTING - DONCASTER WAY AND WEST 56TH STREET Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.A Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends❑ To HRA To refer the petition for street lighting at Doncaster Way and West 56th Street to the Engineering Department for processing. Info/Background: The attached petition requesting street lighting at the corner of Doncaster Way and West 56th Street was received from residents at 5520 and 5521 Doncaster Way. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. To Council Action M Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion To refer the petition for street lighting at Doncaster Way and West 56th Street to the Engineering Department for processing. Info/Background: The attached petition requesting street lighting at the corner of Doncaster Way and West 56th Street was received from residents at 5520 and 5521 Doncaster Way. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. f� o( e City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: �f\ )o CITY COUNCIL o .a 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • (612) 927 -8861 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE C�� Zo a kj,�JA� 6-5-A) 9.:?-7 grJ474�-- NAME ADDRESS C&4, `sv j6 PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER ION d COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01/03/95 $479.25 A -1 PRINTERS INC PRINTING 00030523 COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING 151789 $479.25* 01/03/95 $45.50 AARRESTAD, DRU ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151790 $45.50* 01/03/95 $455.70 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27530 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7623 01/03/95 $99.02 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 2761800 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7818 151791 $554.72* 01/03/95 $15.15 ACTION MESSENGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 00151527 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 151792 $15.15* 01/03/95 $98.15 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 15045759 CENTENNIAL LAK ALARM SERVICE 01/03/95 $217.83 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 15045760 ED BUILDING & ALARM SERVICE 151793 $315.98* 01/03/95 $106.50 ALL FIRE TEST INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 003845 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 7734 01/03/95 $113.07 ALL FIRE TEST INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 3657 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 151794 $219.57* 01/03/95 $1,070.33 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 23809 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 01/03/95 $100.11 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 23785 POOL TRACK GRE PRINTING 7745 151795 $1,170.44* 01/03/95 $27.63 ALSTAD, MARIAN ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151796 $27.63* 01/03/95 '$94.66 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTE GENERAL SUPPLIES 35507810 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7090 151797 $94.66* 01/03/95 $15.61 AT &T TELEPHONE 112794 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 151798 $15.61* 01/03/95 $390.00 BAGLEY, DOUG UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151799 $3.90.00* 01/03/95 $65.70 BARNARD ELECTRONICS SE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 0013549 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 6539 151800 $65.70* 01/03/95 $32.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 66600 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $71.72 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 66585 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $131.06 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 208432 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $133.45 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 208436 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $33.48 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 208438 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $102.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 66599 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $37.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B 62439 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 151801 $542.21* 01/03/95 $35.10 BENN, BRADLEY ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER ;:.sr� 44 Page 2 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION --- - - - - - ------- -------- -�:- -------------------------- 151802 $35.10* S 2128971 2125550 FIRE DEPT. GEN G OFFICE SUPPLIE 772 01/03/95 $34.04 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 2130510 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE SUPPLIE 7725 7725 01/03/95 $6.11 $$6.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2128970 2131610 FIRE DEPT. GEN ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIE 7833 01/03/95 01/03/95 $72.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2127920 CENT SVC GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 01/03/95 $13.04 10.44 - BERTELSON BROS�. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2125540 PARK ADMIN. 01/03/95 $7.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2125540 PWNBUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 01/03/95 $95.36 BERTELSON BROS. BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2125540 CM206783 CENT SVC GENER CENT SVC GENER GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI 01/03/95 01/03/95 39329* BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 151803 $34793.28 * GENERAL SUPPLIES 012459 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 783 01/03/95 $12.94 BEST L OCKING SYSTEMS O 151804 $12.94* SERVICES CL /EB 011995 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $ BETSWORTH, JACKI 151805 80.00* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OT .01/03/95 $61.65 BRATTLAND, CYNTHIA 151806 $61.65* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $58.50 BRIGHT, CAROL 151807 $58.50* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $ BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 151808 111.gp* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $269.10 BUEHLL, KIM 151809 $269.10* GENERAL SUPPLIES 010195 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI MEETING EXPENS 01/03/95 $62.29 $11 .66 BUIE, BARBARA BUIE, BARBARA MEETING EXPENSE 010195 010195 CENTENNIAL LAK CENTENNIAL LAK MEETING EXPENS 01/03/95 01/03/95 $$11 .95 BUIE, BARBARA MEETING EXPENSE 151810 $213.90* GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451199 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7842 01/03/95 $88.45 BUILDERS SQUARE 151811 $88.45* SERVICES CL /EB 121594 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $75.00 BUNN, DEAN 151812 $75.00* SERVICES CL /EB 013195 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $100.00 CARLSON, CRAIG 151813 $100.00* CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5458 ART CENTER BLD CONTR REPAIRS 7020 01/03/95 $2 CASH REGISTER SE RVICE 151814 00.00* ;:.sr� 44 r oil �T COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------------------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01/03/95 $293.55 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 363545 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7798 151815 $293.55* 01/03/95 $60.40 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 122094 /K ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $10.74 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 122094/P INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $83.33 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 122094 /P ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 01/03/95 $654.92 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 122094/P PATROL TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $24.37 CELLULAR Ofl CELLULAR PHONE 122094/P PATROL TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $133.34 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 122094/P INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 151816 $967..10* 01/03/95 $87.78 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON INTEGRATION COST FOR 122394 SPECIAL ACTIVI SALARIES TEMP 151817 $87.78* 01/03/95 $402.97 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 1209 CLUB HOUSE SEWER & WATER 151818 $402.97* 01/03/95 $75.00 CLELAND, BRUCE SERVICES CL /EB 011695 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151819 $75.00* 01/03/95 $129.65 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 02995453 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 151820 $129.65* 01/03/95 $46.15 COLE, SALLIE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151821 $46.15* 01/03/95 $1,741.09 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE B USED OFFICE FURNITUR 2618 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACEM 6705 01/03/95 1 $15.00 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE B REMODELING 00044150 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 151822 $1,756.09* 01/03/95 $128.00 COMMUNICATION BRIEFING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 122994 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI 151823 $128.00* 01/03/95 $17.36 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPME REPAIR PARTS 39270 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 7735 151824 $17.36* 01/03/95 $50.29 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 0399494 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7848 151825 $50.29* 01/03/95 $213.00 CRITTER CONTROL BEAVERS TRAPPING 24442 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 7852 01/03/95 $175.73 CRITTER CONTROL SAFETY EQUIPMENT 24459 BUILDINGS SAFETY EQUIPME 7890 151826 $388.73* 01/03/95 $150.00 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 170201 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 7736 151827 $150.00* 01/03/95 $315.92 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 57148 . DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 7876 151828 $315.92* 01/03/95 $450.00 DENN, ED SERVICES CL /EB 121594 ED-ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER Page 4 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT Po CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ---------------- ------------------------- 151829 450.00* $ DI COST OF GOODS SOLD 129473 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 74 01/03/95 $68.65 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT 151.830 $68.65* 121394 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 01/03/95 $32.70 - DISTINCTIVE LAUNDRY PR LAUNDRY 151831 $32.70* 122794 GENERAL FD PRO CIGARETTE LICE 01/03/95 $60.00 DONAGHUE, N'EL�E SERVICES 151832 $60.00* SERVICES CL/ EB 011995 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $100.00 DUSSL, CONNIE 151833 $100.00* GE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 457813 SOTH VERNON CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $2$ 198.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLTSELLING D B OF GOODS SOLD B 457818 457817 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $2,521.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST 151834 $5,538.05* MEETING EXPENSE /POLI 122794 RESERVE PROGRA MEETING EXPENS 01/03/95 $25.00 EIDEM, KRIS 151835 $25.00* GENERAL SUPPLIES JAN 3, 1 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 01/03/95 $300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB 151836 $300.00* CLASS REFUND 122194 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 01/03/95 $46.00 ERHARDT, JACKIE 151837 $46.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 FASULO, WALTER 151838 $195.00* - WATER TREATMENT SUPP 51046 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 3516 01/03/95 $1,303.08 FEED RITE CONTROL 151839 $1,303.08* FIRE TRAINING MANUAL 07692 FIRE DEPT. GEN TRAINING AIDS 7433 01/03/95 $784.11 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN 151840 $784.11* COST OF GOODS SOLD M 2670 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $60.00 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME 151841 $60.00* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $81.25 FRAME, SUSAN 151842 $81.25* CRAFT SUPPLIES 122694 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 01/03/95 $125,00* FRANSSELL, CATHERINE 151843 $71.00 GADEN, MELANIE ART WORK SOLD 122694 122694 ART CNTR PROG ART SUPPLY GIF SALES OTHER I RI S 01/03/95 01/03/95 PART GENERAL 122694 ART SUPPLY GIF SALARIES TEMP 01 / 0395 $240.00 GADEN, ME LANIE 151844 $369.99* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 5 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 01/03/95 $195.00 GARFIN, JEFF UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151845 $195.00* 01/03/95 $144.07 GARVEN GREETINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD M 102110 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 151846 $144.07* 01/03/95 $500.00 GEREBI, LIZ, SERVICES CL /EB 010195 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 151847 $500.00* 01/03/95 $50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVIC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 941219 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 151848 $50.00* 01/03/95 $35.17 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLI HIDE AWAY MOUSE DRAW 34255251 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7846 151849 $35.17* 01/03/95 $29.25 GOLBERG, CAROL ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151850 $29.25* 01/03/95 $58.84 GRAINGER SAFETY EQUIPMENT 11238259 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 7678 01/03/95 $151.26 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49868739 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7648 01/03/95 $15.40 GRAINGER SAFETY EQUIPMENT 28083117 DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPME 7678 01/03/95 $53.70 GRAINGER SAFETY EQUIPMENT 49869095 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7678 01/03/95 $326..37 GRAINGER TOOLS 49527729 METER REPAIR TOOLS 7693 01/03/95 $133.85 GRAINGER TOOLS 97391252 METER REPAIR TOOLS 7693 01/03/95 $11.54 GRAINGER TOOLS 49527730 METER REPAIR TOOLS 7693 01/03/95 $370.76 GRAINGER TOOLS 49868953 METER REPAIR TOOLS 7675 01/03/95 $50.80 GRAINGER TOOLS 49868954 METER REPAIR TOOLS 7675 151851 $1,172.52* 01/03/95 $120.58 GRIMSBEY, NANCY AC INSTRUCTOR 122694 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151852 $120.58* 01/03/95 $76.50 GROTH MUSIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 334974 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 151853 $76.50* 01/03/95 $89.05 HAMMER, NANCY ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151854 $89.05* 01/03/95 $390.00 HANSEN, WILLIAM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151855 $390.00* 01/03/95 $990.00 HARMON CONTRACT GLAZIN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3215986 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 6680 151856 $990.00* 01/03/95 $32.50 HARTLEY, KAREN ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151857 $32.50* 01/03/95 $285.65 HEDGES, DIANA ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151858 $285.65* Page 6 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM----- OBJECT---------- CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR --------- ------ DESCRIPTION ----- - ______ _______ HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 120694 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 2252 01/03/95 $89.40 151859 $89.40* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 HELMER, RICHARD 151860 $195.00* COL CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 044351 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 01/03/95 $462.00* HENNEPIN TECHNICAL 151861 COST OF GOODS SOLD M 35120 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX SU 01/03/95 $11.60 HOME JUICE WATER TREATMENT SUPP 35113 VERNON SELLING WATER TRTMT 01/03/95 $25.58 HOME JUICE 151862 $37.18* 1735 POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 7834 01/03/95 $111.87 HORIZON CHEMICAL C O IN CHEMICALS 151863 + AC INSTRUCTOR 122694 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 01/03/95 $225.00 HOYT, TRISHA 151864 $225.00* CONTRACTED REPAIRS 149622 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7611 01/03/95 $151.00 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE 151865 $151.00* E2797 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 5493 01/03/95 $1,190.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 151866 $1,190.00* 4197 PUMP LIFT ST P TOOLS 7784 01/03/95 $169.23 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 151867 $169.23* CLASS REFUND 121794 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 01/03/95 $30.00 JOHNSON, MARTHA 151868 $30.00* $82.03 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 122694 122694 ART CENTER ADM ART CENTER BLD CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLI 01/03/95 01/03/95 $78.44 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES GIFT SHOP SUPPLIES 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $14.50 JOHNSON, NAOMI 151869 $174.97* GENERAL SUPPLIES 254567 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7016 01/03/95 $61.16 JPM STORE FIXTURE & DI 151870 $61.16* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 JULKOWSKI, JAMES 151871 $195.00* KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 133858 ARTECENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7126 01/03/95 $208.03 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 133524 1333369 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7126 01/03/95 $198.04 KNOX COMM,CREDIT 151872 $425.08* COST OF GOODS SOLD B 121728 YORK 50TH STLSELLIN CST OF GDS BEE $1$296.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 121823 01/03/95 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151873 $2,122.60* 01/03/95 $30.00 KVASNICK, BARB SERVICES CL /EB 011795 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151874 $30.00* 01/03/95 $33.88 LANDIS & GYR POWER INC REPAIR PARTS 559758 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7383 151875 $33.88* 01/03/95 $390.00 LANDRY, STEPHEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151876 $390.00* 01/03_/95 $195.00 LAWSON, ROBERT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151877 $195.00* 01/03/95 $51.35 LINDSKOOG, JACQUE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151878 $51.35* 01/03/95 $195.00 LISK, LEROY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151879 $195.00* 01/03/95 $195.00 LUTTS, WILLIAM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151880 $195.00* 01/03/95 $328.90 LYMAN, MARTHA ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151881 $328.90* 01/03/95 $233.94 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33944 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $334.20 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33975 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $284.07 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 33886 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 151882 $852.21* 01/03/95 $155.00 M.I.L.E. CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 010195 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 151883 $155.00* 01/03/95 $2,654.09 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 2950332 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 6986 151884 $2,654,.09* 01/03/95 $75.00 MALLICK, INDRINI SERVICES CL /EB 011295 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151885 $75.00* 01/03/95 $195.00 MALONEY, JOHN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151886 $195.00* 01/03/95 $4,625.00 MAMA -LMC LABOR RELATIO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 010195 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 151887 $4,625.00* 01/03/95 $98.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 334953 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $13.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 332719 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $870.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 332717 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $470.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 334954 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE Page 8 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT NUM. CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION M 332720 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX -- 01/03/95 $107.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD M 332722 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 $64.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 332718 50TH T SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX GDS BEE $11.55 COST OF GOODS SOLD B 332721 VERNON SELLING CST OF 01/03/95 $2,95 MARK VII SALES 151888 $4,487.95* SERVICES CL /EB 011695 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $1 MCAFEE, BARBARA 151889 50.00* ' GENERAL SUPPLIES 98087 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 7464 01/03/95 $181.60 MCC /MIDWEST 151890 $181.60* 7584652 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 7998 01/03/95 $97.60 MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFF COFFEE 151891 $97.60* REPAIR PARTS 65693 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7703 7821 01/03/95 $216.36 MECO REPAIR PARTS 65694 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 01/03/95 $447.29 MECO 151892 $663.65* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $ MEDZIS, ANDREW 151893 195.00* BUILDING MATERIALS 494338 GOLF PROG GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE 721 '7485 01/03/95 $97.38 $$97.42 MENARDS MENARDS STARTER BUILDINGS 6429 6330 GOLF PROG GOLF PROG GOLF COURSE 7211 01/03/95 01/03/95 $38.37 MENARDS STARTER BUILDING MAT REPAIR PARTS 493505 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 7208 01/03/95 $14.48 MENARDS 151894 $316.65* MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 37840 CLUB HOUSE BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 7658 7865 01/03/95 01/03/95 $336.80 $266.14 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 37850 37803 ED ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7772 01/03/95 $449.32 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 37775 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7724 01/03/95 $440.75 MERIT SUPPLY 151895 $1,493.01* CONTRACTED REPAIRS 17342 LIFT STATION M CONTR REPAIRS 7887 01/03/95 $278.63 METRO ELECTRIC 151896 $278.63* SEWER SERVICE METRO 50500195 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR 01/03/95 $289 612.00 , METRO WASTE CONTROL 151897 $289,612.00* PAGER RENTAL 22509612 FIRE DEPT..GEN EQUIP RENTAL 01/03/95 $47.91 MINN COMM PAGING 151898 $47.91* ADVERTISING 120994 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 01/03/95 $20:00 MINNESOTA A RTS DIRECTO 151899 * NE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $72.15 MINNESOTA D ESIGNERS 151900 * ELEVATOR INC SERVICE CONTRACTS-EQ 120396 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 01/03/95 $65.00 MINNESOTA • 4' fLL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151901 $65.00* 01/03/95 $385.21 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 102252 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7679 01/03/95 $40.12 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 102379 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7705 151902 $425.33* 01/03/95 $77.50 MINNESOTA JAYCEES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 121594 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES 151903 $77.50* 01/03/95 $308.00 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I2313 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7850 01/03/95 $19.20 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 11880 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7563 01/03/95 $77.11 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I2062 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 7849 01/03/95 $106.50 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO GENERAL SUPPLIES I1925 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7843 01/03/95 $42.45 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO GENERAL SUPPLIES I2013 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7480 01/03/95 $26.67 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I1969 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 7849 151904 $579.93* 01/03/95 $120.85 MINNETONKA IRON WORKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 00001002 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7390 151905 $120.85* 01/03/95 $20.00 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE LICENSES & PERMITS 010195 GENERAL TURF C LIC & PERMITS 151906 $20.00* 01/03/95 $10.00 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 122194 ED.ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 151907 $10.00* 01/03/95 $600.00 MPCA CONT ED 122394 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 151908 $600.00* 01/03/95 $50.00 MPLS COMMODORES BARBER SERVICES CL /EB 010595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 151909 $50.00* 01/03/95 $14.15 MTS NW SOUND REPAIR PARTS 311038 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 7007 151910 $14.15* 01/03/95 $115.02 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR PARTS 6126 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7790 151911 $115.02* 01/03/95 $43.00 MUZAK ADVERTISING OTHER 121594/5 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 01/03/95 $57.48 MUZAK DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 121594/C ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 151912 $100.48* 01/03/95 $255.02 NEBCO EVAN$ DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F 348573 CENTENNIAL LAK CST OF GD FOOD 151913 $255.02* 01/03/95 $126.54 NORTH STAR,TURF COST OF GOODS SOLD 226113 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7471 01/03/95 $11.99 NORTH STAR TURF COST OF GOODS SOLD 226075 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7467 01/03/95 $93.45 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 101380 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7562 01/03/95 - $11.99 NORTH STAR TURF COST OF GOODS SOLD 226193 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 01/03/95 $108.12 NORTH STAR TURF COST OF GOODS SOLD 226139 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7018 Page 10 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT NUM. CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ---------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION ---------------------------- ------------------------- ART SUPPLY GIF -- CST OF GD FOOD 7467 __ ____ 01/03/95 __ $160.79 NORTH STAR TURF COST OF GOODS SOLD 225894 151914 $488.90* FIRST AID SUPPLIES 86330 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 2617 2617 01/03/95 $61.83 NORTHERN AIRGAS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 870520 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 01/03/95 NORTHERN AIRGAS 151915 $$61.05* SUP REPAIR PARTS 465827 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 7656 01/03/95 $57.88 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC 151916 $57'88* $106.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 51080 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 01/03/95 01/03/95 $18.60 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 50467 151917 $124.80* NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL NW16922 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 7871 BDIS 01/03/95 $211.00 $227.31 RN TIRE CO NW16624 SIIPERVEN& OVRH HAZESWASTE 7671 01/03/95 / / $72.00 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO HAZESWASTEBDISPOSAL 151918 $510.31* GENERAL SUPPLIES 66713 SKATING RINK M GENERAL SUPPLI 7776 01/03/95 $169.34* OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE 151919 122094 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $76.00 OLSEN, MIKE BEER LINES 151920 $76.00* OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 245768 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 7420 01/03/95 01/03/95 $648.07 $4,583.25 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPUTER 151921 $5,231.32* PEST CONTROL 121494 CITY HALL ,GENE CONTR REPAIRS 7926 01/03/95 $58.58 ORKIN 151922 $58.58* OUTSIDE SERVICES INC TREE REMOVAL 122194 TREE REMOVAL CIP 01/03/95 $511.20 151923 $511.20* TREE REMOVAL 121594 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS 4973 01/03/95 $928.50* OUTSIDE SERVICES INC 151924 PATTIWORKS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 1027 ED ADMINISTRAT ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES PROF SERVICES 01/03/95 $80.00 PATTIWORKS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 1026 01/03/95 $$80.00* 151925 SELLIN CST OF GD WINE TSELLING OF GD WINE $19 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 46669 VERNON CST 01/03/95 216.00 $565.50 OF GOODS SOLD W 46700 YORKOSELLINGNG CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $98.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST 151926 $1,075.50* COST OF GOODS SOLD M 48493409 SOTH ST CST OF GDS MIX IN CST OF GDS MIX SELLING 01/0395 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING C ST OF GOODS SOLD M 48293207 YORK 01 03/95 $156.80 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ----------------------------------------------------------_----------------------------------7------------------------------------ 151927 $324.65* 01/03/95 $97.98 PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPH GENERAL SUPPLIES 4768 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7665 151928 $97.98* 01/03/95 $497.89 PONY EXPRESS RELOADERS AMMUNITION 121594 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 7830 151929 $497.89* 01/03/95 $680.00 POSTMASTER" POSTAGE /ART.CENTER 122694 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 151930 $680.00* 01/03/95 $225.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /SENIOR CENTE 111494 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 151931 $225.00* 01/03/95 $258.37 R &R SPECIALTIES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 0000726 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 7442 151932 $258.37* 01/03/95 $390.00 RADJENOVICH, JOEL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151933 $390.00* 01/03/95 $36.40 RASMUSSEN, JANAAN SKIB ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151934 $36.40* 01/03/95 $155.92 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1021 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7836 151935 $155.92* 01/03/95 $2,487.50 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 115415 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $54.35 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 115512 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $1,902.70 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 115418 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $414.75 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 115417 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 $355.50 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 115969 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 151936 $5,214.80* 01/03/95 $170.95 RICHARDS, SUE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151937 $170.95* 01/03/95 $93.02 RIEDELL SHOES ICE SKATES 125950 EDINB /CL PROG MACH. & EQUIP 7185 01/03/95 $432.40 RIEDELL SHOES ICE SKATES 125782 EDINB /CL PROG MACH. & EQUIP 7185 01/03/95 $943.04 RIEDELL SHOES ICE SKATES 125598 EDINB /CL PROG MACH. & EQUIP 7185, 151938 $1,468.46* 01/03/95 $73.61 RIFFEY, JANE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER . 151939 $73.61* 01/03/95 $390.00 ROBINSON, JAMES E UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151940 $390.00* 01/03/95 116.03 ROFIDAL, SUE ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 151941 116.03* 'i L• 1 Page 12 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT NUM.- CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR _ DESCRIPTION ----------------------------------------------------- CL /EB ------------------------------- 011595 ED ADMINISTRAT -- PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $35.00 ROSEVILLE BIG BAND SERVICES 151942 $35.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 ROTHE, ALLEN 151943 $195.00* AC INSTRUCTOR 122694 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 01/03/95 $ RUDQUIST, MONICA 151944 30.55* I UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 RUNNING, PATRICK 151945 $195.00* SERVICES CL /EB 010895 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $125.00 RUST, ROGER 151946 $125.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 SAMUELSON, RONALD 151947 $195.00* SERVICES CL /EB 011095 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $9 SAWYER, CHERYL 151948 0.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 .$195.00 SCHEERER, MARTIN 151949 $195.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 SCHMITZ, THOMAS 151950 $195.00* REPAIR PARTS 67734 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 7847 01/03/95 $186.69 SECOA 151951 $186.69* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $ SIEMS, JEFFERY 151952 195.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 SINGLETON, JAMES 151953 $195.00* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $ SMEGAL, GREGORY 151954 195.00* B 42392 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 / $1,041.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD 151955 $1,095.25* FIRST QUARTER 010195 COMMUNICATIONS PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $6,401.91 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CAB 151956 $6,401.91* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $285.97 SPECIAL EFFECTS 151957 $285'97* SPECIALIZED GRAP HICS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3274 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 7877 01/03/95 $452.63 'i L• 1 YY• � r - COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 13 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM.' 151958 $452.63* 01/03/95 $42.90 STAR TRIBUNE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 122794 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 151959 $42.90* 01/03/95 $57.83 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 117821 POLICE.DEPT. G AMMUNITION 8004 151960 $57.83* 01/03/95 $19.5.00 STRUZYK, JOSEPH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 151961 $195:00* 01/03/95 $51.74 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE 121594 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 7873 151962 $51.74* 01/03/95 $19.75 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 012175 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 7924 01/03/95 $4.24 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 012175 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 7924 01/03/95 $8.47 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 012175 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 7924 01/03/95 $14.06 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 012175 - ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7924 151963 $46.52* 01/03/95 $28.45 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 38146 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 151964 $28.45* 01/03/95 $5.00 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CE REPAIR PARTS 1216.94 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7803 151965 $5.00* 01/03/95 $124.00 TERRY ANN SALES CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 2078 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 151966 $124.00* 01/03/95 $222.80 THE BOOKMEN -INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 311702 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 7748 151967 $222.80* 01/03/95 $488.38 THE HOWE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES I326655 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7498 151968 $488.38* 01/03/95 $279.20 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2240 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $48.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1980 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $64.20 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2303 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $279.75 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2241 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $84.00 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2395 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 - $17.34 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2093 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 - $11.67 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 2092 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $19.50 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD B 2242 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 151969 $745.64* 01/03/95 $41.00 THOMAS, JANET M CLASS REFUND 121794 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 151970 $41.00* 01/03/95 $105.97 THOMPSON ENTERPRISES REPAIR`PARTS 084949 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 7451 151971 $105.97* ,; Vii; ;.. ,,. Page 14 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION $29.90 THOMPSON, BETTY ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 151972 $29.90* 193.40 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD M SOLD B 4809 9 48099 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS Mix CST OF GDS BEE 01/03/95 01/03/95 $3$299.45 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS 151973 $3,492.85* DARRELL' CONT ED /FIRE 122794 FIRE DEPT. GEN GEN CONF & SCHOOLS UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $115.50 TODD, TODD, DARRELL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. 01/03/95 $390.00 151974 $505.50* 298204 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 7491 01/03/95 $29.93 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP TOOLS 151975 $29.93* ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $37.72 TOURVILLE, SUSAN 151976 $37.72* INC REPAIR PARTS 136118 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7670 01/03/95 $193.83 TRANSPORT WHITEGMC 151977 * SERVICES CL /EB 011295 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $30:00 TRETTEL, KATHY 151978 $30.00* UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 122194 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 01/03/95 $35.00 151979 $35..00* OF MINN UNIVERSITY ESOT CONT ED /PARK & REC 121994 MOWING CONF & SCHOOLS 01/03/95 $ 151980 45.00* TELEPHONE 121094 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $6.19 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 112094/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 01/03/95 $19.08 US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 112094/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 01/03/95 $27.98 US WEST CELLULAR 151981 $81.23* IONS TELEPHONE CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 01/03/95 $1,092.52 US WEST COMMUNICAT 151982 $1,092.52* UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /FI 122194 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $195.00 VERNON, RICHARD 151983 $195.00* SERVICES CL /EB 012695 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 01/03/95 $75.00 VICE, GARY 151984 $75.00* SERVICES CL /EB 010595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC'OTHER 01/03/95 $100.00 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 151985 $100.00* SUPPLIE 122704 94 122794 LIES POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 01/03/95 $12.24 WATERSTREET, JOAN AMMUNITION ,; Vii; ;.. ,,. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:08 Page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01/03/95 $12.19 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 122794 RESERVE PROGRA MEETING EXPENS 01/03/95 $70.67 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 122794 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 01/03/95 $33.25 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 122794 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 01/03/95 $66.35 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 122794 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS 01/03/95 $18.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 122794 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 01/03/95 $48.50 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 122794 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 151986 $287.76* 01/03/95 $28.60 WENDORF, HAROLD ART WORK SOLD 122694 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 01/03/95 $54.00 WENDORF, HAROLD AC INSTRUCTOR 122694 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 151987 $82.60* 01/03/95 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 9 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 6866 01/03/95 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 8 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 6865 151988 $180.00* 01/03/95 $446.78 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 15770 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7706 151989 $446.78* 01/03/95 $34.02 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC -P GENERAL SUPPLIES 1207546 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7700 01/03/95 $59.51 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC -P GENERAL SUPPLIES 1209835 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 7683 151990 $93.53* 01/03/95 $16.94 WINDOWS SOURCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 122994 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI 151991 $16.94* 01/03/95 $201.93 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 41952 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $261.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 16586 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $178.23 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $458.39 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 42001 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $310.14 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 16560 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/03/95 $60.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 16587 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 151992 $1,470.29* 01/03/95 $216.20 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS IN GENERAL SUPPLIES 49456 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 151993 $216.20* 01/03/95 $145.39 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54180687 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME 151994 $145.39* 01/03/95 $14.58 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS PKC01980 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7797 01/03/95 $4,494.30 ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL G2161501 DISTRIBUTION EQUIP RENTAL 7371 151995 $4,508.88* $385,112.80 Page 1 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Wed Dec 28 1994 23:42:56 ---------------- - - - - -- $30,625. FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $7,108.79 FUND V 12 COMMUNICATION $2,267.29 FUND # 15 .WORKING CAPITAL $6,178.51 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $2,368.86 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND # 30 EDINB /CENT LAKES $10,752.71 $298,310.24 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $27,500.70 FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $385,112.80