Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1995 7:00 P.N. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council_ Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of June 5, 1995. II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as pre -list dated 6/16/95 Total: $1,201.60 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: Edina High School "Boys' Tennis" Edina High School "Girls' Golf" Edina High School "Boys' Track" I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Mirror Oaks, 5000 Blake Road II. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council to pass. * A. First Readin¢ - Ordinance No. 1995 -3 - An Ordinance Granting a Two Year Franchise to Northern States Power (Continue to July 3, 1995) B. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1995 -5 - Street Name Change - W. 50th Street between Vernon Avenue and.Arcadia Street III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Fire Department Ambulance * B. Water Tower Painting and Renovation - Gleason Road * C. Insurance Renewals - Property Damage, Workers' Compensation, Boiler Liability and Automobile AGENDA /EDINA CITY COUNCIL June 19, 1995 Page two IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Park Board Recommendation - Lewis Park * B. Traffic Safety Committee Recommendations C. Appointments to Human Relations Commission * D. New 3.2 Beer License - Q. Cumbers E. Metropolitan Livable Communities Act V. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS I%. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 6/16/95 TOTAL: $1,764,463.65 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 6/7/95 TOTAL: $557,346.98 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon July 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Tues July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Mon July 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Aug 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Tues Aug 15 Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M. Council Chambers Mon Aug 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Tues Aug 22 Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M. Council Chambers Poor Quality Document Disclaimer The original or copy of a document or page of a document presented at the time of digital scanning contained within this digital file-may be of substandard quality for viewing, printing or faxing needs. MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JUNE 5, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold to approve the ERA Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF MAY 15, 1995, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold to approve the Joint HRA /Council Minutes of May 15, 1995. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GRANDVIEW AREA IRRIGATION SERVICE Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold for award of bid for the Grandview area irrigation service to recommended low bidder Highview Plumbing, Inc. at $6,074.30. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the BRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 1, 1995, and consisting of one page totaling $14,392.96. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:26:40 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $159.76 HARDRIVES INC CONCRETE BOX 20874 GRANDVIEW UNDERGROUND 1632 012732 $159.76* 06/19/95 $1,041.84 WHEELER LUMBER TIMBERS 12200065 GRANDVIEW STREET IMPROVE 012733 $1,041.84* $1,201.60 O ch O ORPOii3` � f3 08 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1995 BOYS' TENNIS TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1995 Boys' Tennis Team were Tri- Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA Champions and State Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Tyler Anderson Derek Brandt Ian Campbell Ryan Fuller Seth Kaplan Erich Koch • Erich Schellhas Will Schoen Marty Senn Chris Sheffert Mike Underwood Brian Wyatt Coach: Gary Aasen Director: Steve Dove BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1995. MAYOR 0 tit ©ea RESOLUTION OF COMAIENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1995 GIRLS' GOLF TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1995 Girls' Golf Team were Classic Lake Champions, Section 6AA Champions, State Champions and Section 6AA Academic Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Kalen Anderson Katie Bennett Laurie Engelking Anne Faust Hilary Homeyer Emily Reinertsen Coach: Doug Galligher Director: Steve Dove BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1995. MAYOR O e =: to O iae8 RESOLUTION OF COMNIENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1995 BOYS' TRACK TEAM MEMBER WHEREAS, Mike Brockwell was the 1995 State Champion in Pole Vaulting, and his accomplishment of 14'9" set a new Edina High School Record and a new 6AA State Tournament Record; and WHEREAS, success has come to Mike as a member of the Track Team because of his extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of his coaches; and WHEREAS, as a representative of the City of Edina, Mike as a member of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to: Mike Brockwell Coaches: Greg Heinecke, Rob Miller, Blake Hanson, Steve Siegmund & Jon Nickle Director: Steve Dove BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to the Team member and his coaches. ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1995. MAYOR r. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: June 19, 1995 SUBJECT:, Preliminary Plat approval. Mirror Oaks. 5000 Blake Road. Groves Stickney. Recommendation: Agenda Item # Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action I. A. ❑ Consent ❑ To HRA x ❑ To Council ❑ Motion ❑x Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Limiting Lot Coverage to 20% 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Developers Agreement 5. Watershed District Grading Permit 6. Review of Private Deed Restrictions at time of Final Plat approval. Info /Background: Since the Planning Commission meeting the developers have modified the storm water plan as recommended by the City Engineer and have responded to the Planning Commission recommendation that lot coverage be limited to 20 percent rather than our normal 25 percent. Fran Hoffmans memo concerning storm water management is attached. The developer is proposing to use private deed restrictions to respond to the Planning Commission recommendation that lot ' coverage be reduced. The attached full -sized print illustrates a conceptual development of the property with all lots developed at 20 percent lot coverage. Based on this study the developer is willing to limit coverage to 20 percent through a private deed restriction. The attached draft restriction also proposes a minimum building separation (30 feet) and a tree replacement requirement. It should be pointed out that the City would not be party to the restrictions, and therefore, would not have standing to enforce the restrictions. Enforcement would be by the developer or the homeowners association. J DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING MAY 31, 1995 S -95 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval Mirror Oaks, 5000 Blake Rd Groves Stickney Limited Company Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property comprises two lots with total land area of 10.1 acres. Existing improvements include a single dwelling, a log cabin, and a storage building. Most of the site is gently rolling, however, there are areas of steep slopes along Blake Road and near the ponds in the south and southwest portions of the property. The site is heavily wooded with 454 trees having caliper diameter of six inches or greater. Mr. Larsen explained the preliminary plat presented for Commission review would create eleven single dwelling lots. The existing improvements on the property would be removed. The subdivision would be served by a new street coming off Blake Road. Lots range in size from 30,010 to 71,078 square feet in area. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note Lot 5 requires a lot width variance, and lots 1,3,4,8, 9, and 10 require lot depth variances. All lots exceed the neighborhood median lot area. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends preliminary plat approval, including the requested variances subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Developers Agreement which addresses all comments of the City Engineer 4. Watershed District Grading Permits The proponent, Mr. Stickney was present, Mr. Richard Bloom was also present representing the proponents. Interested neighbors were present. Commissioner Hale noted the site lines for this proposal have the potential to be dangerous and questioned Mr. Larsen if anything will be done to improve the site lines onto Blake Road. Mr. Larsen said plans indicate a gradual grade change as you enter /exit the subdivision with a flat landing pad at the Blake Road intersection. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if Fran Hoffman is concerned with clear view. Mr. Larsen responded Mr. Hoffman has reviewed the entrance /exit to the site and feels the proposal addresses the site line issue sufficiently considering the topography. Mr. Larsen noted staff is aware the site line situation is not ideal, but 1 DRAFT everything possible has been executed to enhance the site lines. Commissioner Workinger noted the congestion problem along the Interlachen /Blake intersection, and asked Mr. Larsen if the county has indicated a time frame for the installation of a signal at this intersection. Mr. Larsen acknowledged there is lag time in this area, adding he is not sure if, or when, Interlachen /Blake will be signaled. Commissioner Workinger stated he wants to make sure the proponent understands how important it is to have adequate site lines from the Landing pad for this development. Commissioner Swenson questioned the lot width variance required on Lot 5. Mr. Larsen explained the city zoning ordinance measures lot width 50 feet back from the front property line. This requirement is additional protection against the development of neck lots. Mr. Larsen added in this instance staff believes a variance is warranted because it maintains vegetation, creates an improved plat, and the width at the location of the building pad is adequate. Mr. Richard Bloom addressed the commission explaining the Boos property, in his opinion, is an outstanding piece of property with a vast number of high quality trees. He informed commission members a majority of the trees are mature red and white oak, and it is the goal of the development team to maintain as many mature trees as possible. Continuing, Mr. Bloom informed commission members the site is also comprised of steep slopes and two wetland areas. Mr. Bloom noted another goal of the development team is to minimize impact on adjacent properties with minimal grading, and the use of retaining walls to define the lots and drive. Mr. Bloom added the majority of the grading will occur when the street is cut in. Retaining walls will be pulled back at the intersection to Blake to provide a 2% landing pad area and the entry into the site will be widened to provide the best sight lines possible. Mr. Bloom noted low growing vegetation will be planted at the entry, and the retaining walls will be constructed of either boulder rock or large limestone pieces. Uniform landscaping will be integrated throughout the subdivision. Mr. Bloom addressed the issues concerning drainage, and explained a nurp pond will be constructed to collect and allow for the settlement of water run off from the new road. Mr. Bloom pointed out in the original drawings drainage flowed south, and in speaking with the engineering department they indicated drainage should flow north into Mirror Lakes. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Bloom who will maintain the landscaping plantings once they are in place. Mr. Bloom explained discussions identified the need for a sprinkler system, and the development of a homeowners association which would maintain the grounds. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned how long the association would remain in place. Mr. Bloom said once the plantings have matured the homeowners association can decide how to proceed. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom to explain the 2% landing pad. Mr. 2 Bloom said the site will be graded at entry at 2% with the grade increasing as you travel farther into the site. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom what he thinks the distance is for the landing pad from the street. Mr. Bloom said he believes around 100 - 200 feet. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Bloom why a nurp pond in needed on this site. Mr. Bloom explained water run off from the new road must be contained and allowed to settle before leaving the site. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Bloom the depth of the nurp pond. Mr. Bloom said the nurp pond will be around four feet deep. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom if the development team also designed a scenario with access from Scriver Road. Mr. Bloom explained a design was drafted with Scriver as the access. With Scriver Road as the entrance /exit the 11 lots did a better job of meeting city ordinance requirements, but more trees were lost. The development team felt the Blake Road access had better site lines, and the impact to immediate neighbors would be less. Mr. Bloom concluded the property owners on Scriver Road do not support a Scriver Road access. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Bloom if he considered relocating the nurp pond. Mr. Bloom commented in reviewing the site it appears the best location for the pond is towards Blake Road, but after further study it was found if the pond was placed near Blake Road double lines would have to be constructed to meet code. Commissioner Hale asked who pays for the treatment of the nurp pond. Mr. Bloom said after the pond is constructed the city will manage the pond. He explained there really is no "treatment" the nurp pond is a contained area where the sediments from water run off can settle. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Bloom if a price has been established for the lots. Mr. Bloom responded lots will average around $450,000. Commissioner Swenson asked if any lots have been sold. Mr. Bloom said lots have been sold. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Bloom if any individual has purchased two lots. Mr. Bloom responded an individual has an agreement to purchase two lots. Commissioner Johnson commented in reviewing the plans the footprints appear to depict 4,000 square foot building pads. Continuing, Commissioner Johnson said it has been his experience, that new owners, especially on lots in this price range want homes with building pads larger than 4,000 square feet. Concluding, Commissioner Johnson stated he has a concern with the site being developed with 11 "castles ", and questioned if the development team has considered size requirements. Mr. Stickney addressed the commission and explained the vegetation on this site creates a natural buffer, and it is very important for this development to retain as many trees as possible. Mr. Stickney responded to Commissioner Johnsons questions by explaining at present there are no formal plans that limit the size of future houses. Mr. Stickney reiterated, as indicated previously, the conservation of trees is very important to this development. Continuing, Mr. Stickney pointed out a 4,000 square foot building pad is large when one considers there are upper and lower levels, with the end result being a house approximately 10,000 square feet. Commissioner Johnson agreed a 10,000 square foot house is large, but noted the lots are large, and it is possible to have building pads in excess of 6,000 square feet, and still maintain city setback requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Stickney if he would be willing to consider a reduction in lot coverage. Mr. Stickney responded he has not considered lot coverage reduction, adding he is not sure how he feels about it. Commissioner Johnson reiterated he is concerned with the potential for building at minimal setbacks without additional restrictions. Commissioner McClelland agreed, she pointed out recently on Schaefer Road homes have been constructed that exceed 10,000 square feet and appear very large. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland said it has been indicated an individual wants to purchase two lots, and it is feasible this individual could construct a house over those lots. Mr. Stickney stated the individual has indicated the desire for a house approximately 7,500 square feet in size to be constructed on one lot. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Stickney if he believes the 4,000 square foot building pads depicted on the site plan are too restrictive. Mr. Stickney added he is not sure. He explained we indicated 4,000- square foot building pads because we believe the end result is a home 7,500 to 10,000 square feet which is what the majority of buyers seem to want. Commissioner Johnson reiterated he would like to see a reduction in lot coverage to ensure the property remains as wooded and open as possible. Commissioner Hale suggested a compromise. He explained if the commission recommends limiting lot coverage to 20% and an individual desires more, the request can be heard at the variance level. Commissioner Swenson agreed, she added what the commission appears to want is adequate spacing between the new homes so the development doesn't appear to be houses on top of houses. Mr. Bloom informed commission members a neighborhood meeting was held and everyone within 500 feet of the subject site was informed. The concerns expressed at this meeting focused on the new road, the suggestion that the sidewalk along Blake Road .be extended, and curb and gutter be added to Scriver Road. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Stickney if he intends to build on all lots. Mr. Stickney said his plan is to build on some of the lots. Other builders will be allowed to build if they are approved. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Stickney how many homes he is planning to construct. Mr. Stickney said his plans are to construct two to four homes. LI Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Stickney if he has considered private covenants that could address house placement. Commissioner Hale said he is also concerned with lot coverage and that adequate sideyard setbacks are maintained. Mr. Stickney said private covenants or deed restrictions can address those concerns. Chairman Johnson agreed, adding a review of private deed restrictions can be recommended at the time of final plat as a condition of approval. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if private covenants run with the land who enforces the covenants. Continuing, Commissioner Ingwalson said if he understands covenants correctly they are different from city ordinances, and the city does not have the ability to enforce them. Mr. Stickney said covenants would be enforced through the association. Commissioner Johnson clarified he does not want to cast a negative stance on this proposal, adding it has been his experience that Mr. Stickney does quality work, but he is concerned with overbuilding on large lots. Chairman Johnson concluded he believes this piece of property deserves to be developed with the utmost care. Commissioner Swenson asked who would own the nurp pond. Mr. Larsen said the nurp pond would be maintained by the city, but if the pond becomes something beyond the basic function of a nurp pond, the homeowners association would have to maintain it, or the developer would have to put "money up front" to maintain the pond. Commissioner Faust commented she usually is uncomfortable with granting variances for a new subdivision, but in this instance it makes sense because of the conservation of trees and less grading impact to the site. Mr. R. Jensen, 5125 Blake Road told the commission he has lived in his home for 17 years and wants the commission to ensure that the technical details are correct, and the development is something Edina can be proud of. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said he is pleased with the overall development plan, but has a concern the future home on Lot 4 will have to deal with car headlights within 50 feet of the back door. Mr. Jensen also pointed out Scriver Road now is left with an asphalt turn around which should be finished. Concluding Mr. Jensen asked what the plan is for the log cabin presently located on the site. Mr. Bloom responded someone is interested in conserving the log cabin on the site, but at a different location. Mr. Charles Hanna, 6300 Interlachen Boulevard said he does not have a problem with the proposal, but is concerned with the sidewalk situation, adding he would like to see it extended to intersect with Blake Road. 5 After a brief discussion Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: Subdivision Dedication, Developers Agreement which addresses all comments from the City Engineer, Watershed District grading permits, Parkland Dedication, limiting lot coverage to 20 %, and homeowners association covenants will be incorporated into final plat approval. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Members of the Commission recommended that Council Members consider extending the sidewalk along Blake Road /Interlachen Boulevard, and it was further suggested that the cul -de -sac at the end of Scriver Road be completed with curb and gutter. L CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 1995 TO: Craig Larsen, City Planner FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer -?— SUBJECT: MIRROR OAKS SUBDIVISION After reviewing the revised preliminary concept plans for the subdivision, I would suggest that two additional items be considered by the development team. First, I would suggest that a walking path be constructed on the watermain easement that will connect the cul -de -sac on Scriver Road with the new cul -de -sac. This would allow individuals to be able to walk to Blake Road and then use the Blake Road sidewalk to Bredeson Park. Second, I would suggest that the NURP pond be examined to determine if the size can be developed to maximize water detention from the current development and /or meet current industry water quality standards. As such, I believe the overall concept is satisfactory and the mandatory developer's agreement with the City incorporate the above ideas. Also, the developer needs to submit an application to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for a grading and stormwater management permit. MIRROR OAKS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS This Declaration is made this day of August, 1995,'by the under- signed Developer and fee owner of the land hereafter described lying in Hennepin County. GROVES STICKNEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ( "Developer ") is the fee owner of the real property legally described as follows: A plot plan of the land is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (MIRROR OAKS PLAT) . The Developer desires to impose upon and subject the land to certain conditions, restrictions, reservations and covenants for the benefit of the land and its present and future owners. Accordingly, the Developer hereby declares, imposes upon and makes all of the Lots subject to the following conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements and covenants (the "Covenants "), which shall operate as restrictions passing with the conveyance of each and every Lot and shall apply to and bind each and every successor in interest to the Developer. DRNpT ARTICLE I DRAFT LAND USE Section 1. Land Use.. Each Lot shall be used solely and exclusively for residential purposes. No buildings shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any Lot except a single dwelling house designed for the accommodation of one family only, together with a garage designed to accommodate a minimum of three (3) automobiles, the exterior of which shall be constructed'of the same material used, or to be used, on the exterior of the dwelling house. The finished living area of the main structure, exclusive of open porches, garages, furnace and utility areas and storage areas shall not be the governing issue for approval of any plan. The level of quality finishing and detail and architectural suitability for the neighborhood shall command premium attention. Section 2. No Subdivision. So long as these Covenants are in effect, no subdivision or replatting of any Lots shall be permitted. Section 3. Underground Utilities. All Lots shall be served by underground utility distribution facilities. Poles, wires or other above - ground utility service distribution facilities may be temporarily installed during the initial construction or during any repair of the underground utility cables and facilities. Sec_ tion 4. Ant, ennas. No exterior tower, dish or antenna of any kind shall be constructed, maintained or permitted to remain on any Lot or on any structure on any Lot. New technology of small satelite dishes may be approved. However, site location must be approved by the Architectural Committee. Section 5. Trees. No mature trees shall be cut on any Lot, except dead trees or trees reas onably necessary to facilitate construction pursuant to the plans approved as set forth in Article VI. Section 5A. Tree Preservation Agreement. Any removal or destruction of any of the Four Hundred Fifty Four (454) trees shown on Exhibit A plat of this agreement by means of grading or new home construction processes shall require the new home owner to replace each.tree affected with Two (2) new trees of at least Six (6) inches in diameter each. All trees surveyed and shown on Exhibit A of this Agreement that are located with a Fifteen (15) foot distance of any existing neighboring home abutting this new area of MIRROR OAKS shall also be designated as a tree preservation zone. Any tree removed or destroyed within this area would require the owner to plant Two (.2) new trees of at least Six (6) inches in diameter within the similar Fifteen (15) foot zone. This zone will encircle the entire property except for the Southerly boundary of Lot Five (5) as. it is already governed by the One Hundred (100) foot conservation easement and its' Fifteen (15) foot zone would be almost entirely part of the pond. Section 6. Maintenance. All buildings and the Lot shall be maintained by the Owner thereof in good order and repair in accordance with standards set and maintained from time to time by the owner's association referred to in Article VIII (the Owner's Association). ARTICLE II DRAFT EASEMENTS AND SETBACKS Section 1. Utility and Drainage Easements. Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on the recorded plat of the Land (the "Plat ") . Within these easements, no structure, fence, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction of flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each Lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the Owner of the Lot except for thos improvements for which a public authority or utility company may be responsible and except for those areas maintained by the Owner's Association as set forth herein. The Land is also subject to a Road and Utilities Easement, a Flowage and Conservation Easement, all for the benefit of the City of Edina. Section 2. Setback Requirements. The setback requirements for the building on each Lot shall be approved by the City of Edina and their setback requirements. However, any home or garage foundation in MIRROR OAKS shall be at least Thirty (.30) feet from any neighboring home and garage foundation. Home, .a garage and deck footprints shall not exceed Twenty (20) percent of the total square footage of the Lot site. ARTICLE III NUISA1TCES, LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY Section 1. Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activities shall be carried on upon any Lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. Section 2. Livestock and Poultry. No animals,' livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any Lot, except that dogs, cats or other common household pets may be kept so long as they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purposes and are maintained in accordance with applicable laws and ordinances. ARTICLE CLE IV GARBAGE AUD REFUSE.. DISPOSAL Vo Lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or' other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers out of view from roads, trial easements and adjacent houses. No outside burning or burning apparatus shall be permitted. ARTICLE V OUTDOOR STORAGE, TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, SIGNS Section 1. Temporary Structures and Outdoor Storage. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, garage, boat house, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any Lot at any time as a residence either tempo- rarily or permanently. There. shall be no permanent outside A storage of any tpype of vehicles, watercraft or recreational equipment, including, but not limited to, camping trailers, motor homes, snowmobiles, motorcycles, motorbikes, or boats or canoes. For the purposes of this Section, permanent shall mean storage for more than a two -week period. Section 2. Design Approval. No buildings shall be erected, placed, altered or occupied on any of the Lots nor shall site grading or preparation take place until the building plans and specifications and plat plan showing the location of such building have been approved in writing as to the conformity and harmony of external design with existing structures in the subdivision and as to the location of the building with. respiect to topography and finished ground elevation by the design committee described in this Article. The initial members of the design committee shall be George W. Stickney and Franklin Groves. The initial members of the design committee may designate their replacements at any time from among the then Lot owners. In the event of the death or resign- ation of any member of the design committee, the remaining member or members shall have full authority to approve or disapprove such design and location, or to designate a represenative with like authority. Section 2. Objectives. The objectives of the building design process shall include, among other factors, the following: a) To ensure the construction of only appropriate single - family homes on the Lots; b) To protect and preserve the character and nature of the development of the Land including the natural landscape and woodland charact- eristics of the Land; c) To prevent any commercial, business or industrial use of the Lane; d) To guard against the erection of structures built of unsightly, improper or unsuitable materials; e) To insure adequate and reasonable development of the Land approp- riate to the type of homes to be constructed thereon; f) To encourage the erection of attractive houses and garages approp- riately located to foster a harmonious appearance and function; g) To comply with all terms and use restrictions contained herein and on the Plot Plan and the Plat; h) To ensure compatibility of new construction with existing homes in the Land. Section 3. Review Standards. B uildin -g design and location review by the desi Si committee shall include, but not be li nited to Ca) site grading and land - scapin g plans, (.b) location of all building, (c) height and mass ov buildings in relation to other houses on said land and the general topography of said land, (d) driveway access and (e) exterior finish materials. The plans and specific- ations to be submitted to the design committee hereunder shall include, but not be limited to: (i) site plan, showing finished grades (ii) building elevations, (iii) floor plans, (iv) landscape and roadway access plans, (v) a schedule of exterior materials and finishes and (vi) fences. In the event the design comm- a ittee or its designated representative fails to approve or disapprove such design and location within 20 business days after said plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event in no suit to enjoin the erection of such building or the making of such alterations has been commenced prior to the com- pletion thereof, such approval will not be required and this covenant shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. Section 4. Successor Design Committees. The initial design committee designated in Section 111" shall cease on and after three years from the date hereof at which time all of the powers of such committee shall be transferred to an held by the Owner's Association which shall designate a design committee. Section 5. Subsequent Improvements. After initial occupancy has taken place for the house constructed on the Lot, no exterior improvement or construction which has not previously been approved pursuant to the previous sections shall be commenced and no building shall be altered on the exterior (excluding normal staining or repainting of a similar color) nor any substantial landscape work done on any lot unleas the approvals required by the previous sections shall have been obtained. DRAFT ARTICLE VII OWNER'S ASSOCIATION Section 1. Owner's Association. Each Owner shall be a member of the Owner's Association which shall be the organization to operate and maintain the common areas designated on the Plat Plan and, subject to the rights of the Developer-and the Owners set forth in these Covenants, to enforce the Covenants. 6 0 Section 2. By -laws. The governing procedures and organization aspects of the Owner's Association shall be governed by the by -laws of the Owner's Association as they may exist from time to time. Section 3. Effective Date. Subject to specific exceptions.set forth herein, the Developer shall perform all of the functions of the Owner's Assoc- iation and otherwise serve and be treated as the Owner's Association until the first to occur of the following: (i) the occupancy by Owners of houses on 6 of the 11 Lots and (ii) December 31, 1998. The Developer shall continue to have one vote for each Lot owned by it so long as such ownership shall continue. ARTICLE VIII COMMON AREAS Section 1. Road. The road serving the Land as set forth in the Plat is a publicly dedicated roadway. The City of Edina will maintain or service such and maintenance shall be foverned by the City of Edina. Section 2. Other Common Areas. Entrance monument and the like; and other areas used in common by all Lot Owners shall be considered common areas subject to control and maintenance by the Owner's Association. L)RAFTARTICLE IX ASSESSMENTS Section 1. Creation of the Lien,and Personal Obligation of Assessments. Each owner of any Lot-by acceptance of a deed therefore, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Owner's Association or the Developer, as the case may be: a) General annual assessments or charges, and b) Special assessments for capital improvements; such. assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments, together with interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be a charge on the Land and shall be continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at. the time when the assessment fell due. Each owner of any Lot by the acceptance of a deed therefore, whether or not it be so expressed in the deed, shall be deemed to covenant and agree with each. other and with the Owner's Association thus to pay to the Owner's Association for the purposes provided in the Covenants, for such general and special assessments. Such assessments shall be fixed, established and collected from time to time in the manner provided in this Article and in the by -laws of the Owner's Association. Section 2. Purposes of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Owner's Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Lane, the improvement and maintenance of the Common Areas, and for maintenance, repair and repainting of amenities located within MIRROR OAKS. Section 3. Annual Assessment. The Developer sha -1 pay the assessments with respect to a Lot to the date of closing of the sale of a Lot to an Owner. Thereafter the Owner shall have the responsibility for payment of the assessments. The Developer or the Board of Directors as set forth in Section "3" of Article VII shall fix the annual assessment and the dates and methods of payment. Section 4. Special Assessment for Capital Improvements. Special assessment applicable to a give year only for the purpose of defraying, in who or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstriction, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon the i Common Areas including fixtures and personal property related thereto shall only be levied with the assent of a. two- thirds majority of the votes of the Owner or as otherwise established in accordance with the provisions of the by -laws of the Owner's Association. Section 5. Uniform Rate of Assessment. Both annual and special assessments must be fixed at a uniform rate for all Lots and may be collected on a monthly basis. Section 6. Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments. Any assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at the rate of twelve (12) percent per annum. The Owner's Association may bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the Lot. VP, N-FT t No Owner may waiv-e or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non -use of the common Areas or abandonment of a Lot. A suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid assessments and expenses hereunder shall be maintainable without foreclosing 'or." waiving the lien securing the same. Section 7. Lien for Assessments. All sums assessed to any Lot pursuant to this Artipls together with interest thereon as provided herein, shall. be secured by a lien thereon in favor of the Owner's Association. Such lien shall be superior to all other liens and encumbrances on such Lot except only for: a) Liens of general and special taxes; and b) A lien for all sums unpaid on any first, mortgage. All other persons acquiring liens on any Lot after the Covenants, which liens shall have been recorded in said records,.shall be deemed to consent that such liens shall be inferior to future liens for assessments, as provided;_here- in, whether or not such consent be specifically set forth in the instruments creating such liens. To evidence a lien for sums assessed pursuant to this Article, the Owner's Associa- tion may prepare a written notice of lien setting forth the amount of the assessment, the date due, the amount remaining unpaid, the name of the Owner of the Lot and a description of the Lot and file of record the same. Such lien may be enforced by the judicial•foreclosure, by the Owner's Association or by foreclosure by advertisement in the same manner in which mortgages on real property may be foreclosed in Minnesota. In any such foreclosures, the Owner shall be DRAFT OPPIFV ' d required to pay the costs and expense which also shall be secured by the lien being foreclosed. The Owner shall also 's Association any assess be required to pay to the Owner, ments against the Lot which shall become due during the period of foreclosure sale or other legal saleuse and other - acquire, held, convey, lease, rent, encumber, wise deal with the Lot as the owner thereof. by the A release of notice of lien sh all e of. all sum Owner's Association and recorded, up on payment ssecured by a lien which has been subject of a recorded notice of lien. but shall Any person holding .a lien on a Lot may pay a any amounts secured by the lien not be required to P Y� on such payment such person created by this Article, and up shall be subrogated to,all rights of the Owner's Association with respect to such lien, including priority. The Owner's Association shall upon written request report to any person with a valid lien on a Lot any unpaid assessments remaining unpaid for longer than ninety (9 0) days .after the same shall have become due; provided, How - ever, that such persons first shall have furnished to the Owner's Association written notice of such encumbrance. Section S. Continuing Liability. Sale-or transfer of any Lot shall not affect assessment lien. Nothing herein shall be deemed to extinguish the personal obligation for the delinquent assessments as to the Owner of a Lot at the time such assessments were originally levied unless such obligation is expressly assumed by the subsequent Owner. No sale or transfer shall relieve such Lot from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. DRAFT _ ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Owner. "Owner" shall mean a ^d refer to•the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of the fee simple title to any lot subject to the Covenants, but shall not mean or refer to the mortgagee of any such lot unless and until such mortgagee has acquired title pursuant . to foreclosure of said mortgage and the period within which the fee owner may redeem from such foreclosure has termi- nated. Where any Lot is sold by the Developer or a subse- quent owner by a contract for deed to a vendee, the vendee shall be considered the "Owner". of the Lot upon recording an executed contract for deed. - Section 2. Duration. The conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements and covenants of these Covenants shall run with and bind the land and shall inure to the benefit of an be enforceable by the owner of any Lot subject to these Covenants, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of twenty (20) years from the date these Covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants, restrictions and easements shall be automati: ally renewed for successive periods of ten (10) years each unless an instrument signed by the owners of at least two - thirds of the Lots covered by these Covenants has been recorded, agreeing to change these conditions, restric- tions, reservations easements and covenants, is whole or in part. �r�Fn .e .d l Section 3. Enforcement. The owner of any Lot, inclu- ding the Developer, and the Owner's Association-, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of the Covenants, including the collection of any Owner's pro rata share of maintenance and repairs. In view of the purposes of these Covenants and the unique characteristics of the es to any Owner in Land, it is acknowledged that money damages the event of a violation of any of the terms 'hereof h would d be inadequate due to the irreparable and immeasurable thereby and, accordingly, the Owner of any Lot,-including the Developer, shall have the right, in addition to lnyfor other remedies available at law or in equity, to apply and receive from any court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Minnesota, equitable relief by way of restraining order, injunction or otherwise, prohibitory or mandatory, to prevent and enjoin a breach of the terms of these Covenants, or by means of specific performance to enforce performance of the terms of these Covenants. If successful, the party seeking enforcement of the terms hereof shall be entitled to recover frcm the party violating the terms of this Agreement litigation inclu- reimbursement for all costs and expenses fees, service of ding reasonable attorneys' fees, witness process fees, deposition costs, expert witness fees and any other costs incurred in securing such relief. of the Section 4. Severability. Invalidation of any not provisions herein by judgment or court order shall affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect, until the date of expiration hereunder. 1 .r r Section 5. Amendment. These Covenants may be amended by an instrument signed by Developer during the period Developer performs the function of the Owner's Association as specified in Section IT' of Article VII. Thereafter the Covenants may be amended by a two - thirds majority of the Owners of the Lots. IN WITMESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Declaration to be executed as of the day and year first above written. FRANKLIN N. GROVES GEORGE W. STICKNEY STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1995 by FRANKLIN N. GROVES AND GEORGE W. STICKNEY Notary Public 0R4r;r LOCATION MAP SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -95 -2 L O C A T 10 N 5000 Blake Road REQUEST Create 11 lot subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 i %� w•�oNEr � .: f WIT 4 • I vE WATERMAN ♦v l� 1IRG. 6- IU TEN LAC M •• • • • ■ • .��, 1 • • • • 0 •� '48080, NOLO WOODS .• ..8 ■ •. ■: • :.■■• ••• :.s sc • ■ .I ! :: ■ APP(C • as h I P SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -95 -2 L O C A T 10 N 5000 Blake Road REQUEST Create 11 lot subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 31, 1995 STAFF REPORT S -95 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval Mirror Oaks, 5000 Blake Rd Groves Stickney Limited Company The subject property comprises two lots with total land area of 10.1 acres. Existing improvements include a single dwelling, a log cabin, and a storage building. Most of the site is gently rolling, however, there are areas of steep slopes along Blake Road and near the ponds in the south and southwest portions of the property. The site is heavily wooded with 454 trees having caliper diameter of six inches or greater. The preliminary plat presented for Commission review would create eleven single dwelling lots. The existing improvements on the property would be removed. The subdivision would be served by a new street coming off Blake Road. Lots range in size from 30,010 to 71,078 square feet in area. There are 59 lots within 500 feet of the perimeter of the subject property. The median lot dimensions and lot sizes in the neighborhood are: Lot Width Lot Death Lot Area 125 Feet 210 Feet 24,800 Sq. Ft. Lots within the proposed subdivision have the following area and dimensions: Lot 5 requires a lot width variance, and lots 1,3,4,8, 9, and 10 require lot depth variances. All lots exceed the neighborhood median lot area. Lot Width Lot Death Lot Area Lot 1 247 Feet 204 Feet* 32,026 Sq. Ft. Lot 2 137 252 33,776 Lot 3 279 172* 32,276 Lot 4 153 188* 30,867 Lot 5 76* 448 71,078 Lot 6 193 323 37,171 Lot 7 135 233 38,574 Lot 8 150 187* 30,010 Lot 9 156 183* 30,056 Lot 10 160 175* 30,091 Lot 11 165 243 30,462 Lot 5 requires a lot width variance, and lots 1,3,4,8, 9, and 10 require lot depth variances. All lots exceed the neighborhood median lot area. The proposed public improvements which include the street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water have been reviewed by the City Engineering Department. Fran Hoffman's memo is attached d. The issues raised by Mr. Hoffman are normally addressed between Preliminary and Final plat. As designed the proposed road meets city standards. The maximum grade is seven percent. The developers have estimated the loss of 29 trees because of road construction and utility installation. The pond located at the southerly end of the property requires the granting of a 100 foot conservation easement. The required easement impacts lots 4 and 5, but does not affect the proposed building pads. Recommendation My overall impression of the development is positive. The smallest lot in the subdivision is 5,000 square feet larger than the neighborhood average. All of the lots have over 120 feet of width at the proposed building pad. The required conservation easement does not limit the developability of any lot. The Subdivision Ordinance allows for granting variances if the result is an improved plat. In this case the variances could be eliminated or greatly reduced by a realignment of the road. The result would likely be a less interesting layout with greater tree loss. All of the lots could support a large house while still maintaining adequate separation between homes. The illustrated foot prints are nearly 4,000 square feet. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval, including the requested variances subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Developers Agreement which addresses all comments of the City Engineer 4. Watershed District Grading Permits May 10, 1995 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: Please accept this application for a single - family residential subdivision located at 5000 Blake Road, known as the Boos property. The site contains approximately 10.1 acres and is located south of Mirror Lake, Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard. Neighboring subdivisions include: Taft Addition: Hyland Acres; Interlachen Ridge; Harold Woods: Oak Ponds of Interlachen, as well as Auditors Subdivision No. 325 adjacent to Schaefer Road. We hereby submit the following to support the requested action: 1. Preliminary plat application forms. 2. Preliminary plat for "Mirror Oaks ". 3. Tree inventory. 4. Wetland delineation report prepared by Barr Engineering. 5. Neighborhood analysis. 8. Grading and drainage plan. 7. Utility plan. S. Entrance details, landscape plan. 9. Narrative explaining the development request. This narrative is organized by subheadings to facilitate review. Mirror Oaks is being planned and developed by Stickney /Groves Limited Liability Co. Mr. George Stickney has extensive background In land development, custom- Mr. Craig Larsen May 10, 1995 Page 2 home construction and marketing. He has built large custom estate homes in the Westfield Farms subdivision in Minnetrista; Crystal Bay Farms in Orono; Tuckborough Farms in Medina and Chantey Woods in Minnetonka. Mr. Stickney has also completed numerous custom homes on Lake Minnetonka. His most recent development project is Stable Ridge in Minnetonka. The custom homes range in price from $400,000 to $1,000,000. S.J. Groves, Mr. Stickney's partner, was a worldwide construction company specializing in large, complex projects. They developed the North Ridge Farm project in the City of Medina. Groves has also master planned and developed a 1,130 acre horse farm /home complex in Louisville, Kentucky. This projects' innovative landscape design received a National Landscape Award from Nancy Reagan. S.J. Groves has recently received an Honorable Business Award for 75 years of continued good service. Consulting Team Overall planning and project management services are provided by Richard Bloom. The preliminary plat, tree survey and utility plans have been prepared by Hedlund Engineering and Surveying. The wetland delineation was conducted by Barr Engineering. The entrance plan, boulder wall and landscape plan has been prepared by Mr. Jim Carver. Natural Resource Inventory The 10 plus acre site rises from Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road from elevation 926 up to 950 in the central portion of the site. The northern portion of the site overlooks both Mirror Lake and the Interlachen Country Club. Barr Engineering was retained to delineate two wetland areas on the site. The first is a 4 -5 acre pond located in the southern portion of the site. This pond is shared with Oak Ponds of Interlachen, the Taft Addition and a portion of proposed Lot 5, Mirror Oaks. The water surface elevation was determined to be 936.2 with the wetland edge estimated at elevation 937.5. This pond /wetland is well defined on our site in that a bank falls steeply towards the pond. The second wetland is located in the south - western portion of the site in the rear of proposed Lots 6 and 7, Mirror Oaks. This small wetland appears to be of more recent origin and may be augmented by seeping ground water. The water elevation was surveyed at 936.3 with the wetland edge estimated at elevation 937.3. The irregular boundary of the wetland is due to wetland type vegetation growing uphill which may be indicative of seeping ground water. Mr. Craig Larsen May 10, 1995 Page 3 The site contains approximately 45,680 sq. ft. of steep slopes in excess of 18 %. These slopes are located along Interlachen Boulevard at the north portion of proposed Lots 10 and 11. Steep slopes are also located along the pond bank on Lot 5 and adjacent to the wetland on the rear portion of Lots 6 and 7. An extensive tree identification and survey of all the trees on the property was prepared. White Oak trees are the predominant species with 333 trees found. There are currently 454 trees on the site including: 333 White Oaks 47 Red Oaks 55 Spruce, White Pine and Norway Pines 19 Other (Ash, Butternut, Cherry, Walnut, Locust, Birch & Maple) 454 Total Trees Neighborhood Analysis Fifty -nine properties were identified within the 500 foot neighborhood which encompasses approximately 45 acres. The mean lot area is 33,154 sq. ft., the mean lot width and depth is 141 ft and 255 ft. The median lot area is 24,800 sq. ft. with the median lot width and depth being 125 ft. and 210 ft., respectively. If the median lot area were to be used to determine potential lots, 16 lots would be possible on the subject site. The neighborhood analysis tables are attached. Preliminary Plat A total of 11 single - family lots are proposed for the 10.1 acre site. The average lot size is 36,035 sq. ft., with the minimum lot size being 30,010. The following summarizes the lots proposed: Lot Area (Sq. Ft.) Width Depth Type 1 32,026 247 204 Walkout 2 33,776 137 252 Walkout 3 32,276 270 172 "Corner Walkout 4 30,867 153 188 North Daylight 5 71,078 76 448 Southwest Daylight 6 37,171 193 323 Walkout 7 38,574 135 233 Corner Walkout 8 30,010 150 187 Flat Mr. Craig Larsen May 10, 1995 Page 4 Lot Area (Sq. Ft.) Width Depth Type 9 30,056 156 193 Flat 10 30,091 160 175 Walkout 11 30,462 165 243 Walkout TOTAL: 396,387 1,842 2,618 MEAN: 36,035 167 238 MEDIAN: 32,026 156 233 We believe that the proposed number and sizes of the lots are consistent with the neighborhood. It should be noted that adjustments could be made to certain lots to either increase width or depth which would require shifting of the proposed cul -de- sac. We believe that the proposed street location is superior in that it preserves the most trees on the site. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Extensive efforts have been employed to minimize tree removal. Only 29 of the 454 trees on site will be removed resulting from the development. The following specific measures are proposed to save trees: 1. Retaining walls are proposed along the north end of the street to confine grading. 2. The cul -de -sac was shifted westward to preserve a row of trees located on Lot 2. 3. Retaining walls are proposed on Lot 1 to define the driveway and preserve trees to the north and south. 4. A retaining wall is proposed on Lot 9 to preserve numerous specimen white oaks. It is acknowledged that additional trees will be lost when homes are constructed on each lot. The detailed tree survey will be provided to the architect to assist in the design of each custom home. An extensive entry and landscape plan is being developed to tie into the proposed boulder retaining walls. Entry definition will be comparable to that employed by Groves at their North Ridge Farm project in Medina. Mr. Craig Larsen May 10, 1995 Page 5 A cul -de -sac (White Oak Way) is proposed extending southerly from Blake Road. The street grade has been kept within acceptable limits (6.9 0/6) and will be retained to minimize grading. The retaining walls will range from two to eight feet in height. Two lifts of wall be used where the height is eight feet. The total area to be disturbed by grading amounts to 56,800 sq. ft. or approximately 130 of the site. A storm sewer is proposed in White Oak Way which will empty Into a four foot deep NURP pond at elevation 940.86. An overflow from this NURP pond Is provided at elevation 940.2 which will empty into the southerly pond at elevation 937.5. The water surface of the wetland located on Lots 6 and 7 is 936.3; an overflow is provided at elevation 940.3 which will also be directed to the southerly pond. Sufficient water storage has been provided to retain a 100 -year storm event. Sewer and water utilities will be extended from Blake Road a distance of approximately 620 feet. We believe that the proposed Mirror Oaks Is consistent with the neighborhood, minimizes impacts on neighboring properties and preserves and protects the natural environment. We, therefore, request approval of Mirror Oaks. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Richard H. Bloom Project Manager for Groves /Stickney Limited Liability Co. RHB:kar Enclosure(s) Neighborhood Analysis -- Stickney /Groves App. Sub Division Lot s Block Net Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth 1 Wayne Terrace 1 1 38,690 165 366 2 2 1 45,975 165 366 3 Conn Hts. 1 1 26,660 253 130 4 3 1 16,250 130 125 5 Mirror Lake View 1 1 12,000 100 120 6 2 1 13,200 110 120 7 3 1 12,000 100 120 8 4 1 29,745 125 280 9 5 1 19,765 102 220 10 1 1 18,745 121 170 11 IM Goodwins 2 1 18,600 130 155 12 1 1 19,210 115 175 13 2 1 19,210 104 190 14 Mirror Lake Terr. 1 1 25,910 130 210 15 2 1 15,208 199 180 16 Harold Woods 3 1 52,620 160 387 17 4 1 33,588 168 200 18 5 1 31,085 187 165 19 Harold Woods 1 1 30,925 150 230 20 2nd Addn. 2 1 40,065 150 250 21 Harold Woods 3rd 1 1 45,965 225 225 22 Mark Dahlquist Addn 1 1 86,430 320 668 23 Interlachen Ridge 1 1 82,545 294 264 24 2 1 21,565 100 261 25 3 1 26,190 100 260 26 Part of Lot 27 27 27,315 105 290 27 Aud Sub 325 26 51,480 198 290 28 25 102,750 199 546 29 24 91,450 200 543 30 23 99,836 162 669 31 22 96,010 163 667 32 Oak Ponds 1 1 41,750 163 280 33 Interlachen 2nd 2 1 20,925 47 205 34 3 1 23,700 75. 190 35 4 1 32,100 87 238 Page 1 Neighborhood Analysis -- Stickney /Groves App. Sub Division Lot Block Net Lot Area Lot Width Lot Delth 36 Oak Ponds 1, 2 1 32,710 150 195 37 Interlachen 2, 3 1 24,800 140 233 38 4 1 17,360 90 266 39 5 1 20,770 100 266 40 6 1 15,512 103 148 41 7 1 14,275 75 198 42 1 2 24,800 110 210 43 2 2 16,120 101 150 44 3 2 18,600 102 175 45 4 2 17,240 105 168 46 RLS No. 1404 8 16,720 88 190 47 Aud Sub 325 38 42,230 160 669 48 Taft Addn. 1 1 68,695 360 250 49 2 1 19,250 110 175 50 3 1 19,075 109 175 51 1 2 24,970 128 380 52 2 2 35,493 90 380 53 Hyland Acres 1, 2 1 52,080 170 204 54 3 1 27,900 92 195 55 4 1 18,090 110 135 56 5 1 15,355 115 132 57 1 2 14,880 190 110 58 2 2 14,260 103 155 3 2 15,440 146 140 TOTAL 1,956,087 8,349 15,054 MEAN 33,154 141 255 MEDIAN 24,800 Page 2 I Neighborhood Analysis -- Stickney /Groves App. Median Values Lot Area Width Depth 1 12,000 47 110 2 1,200 75 120 3 13,200 75 120 4 14,260 87 120 5 14,275 88 125 6 14,880 90 130 7 15,208 90 132 8 15,355 92 135 9 15,440 100 140 10 15,512 100 148 11 16,250 100 150 12 16,720 100 155 13 16,120 100 155 14 17,240 101 165 15 17,360 102 168 16 18,090 102 170 17 18,600 103 175 18 18,745 104 175 19 18,600 105 175 20 19,210 105 175 21 19,210 103 180 22 19,765 109 190 23 19,075 110 109 24 19,250 110 190 25 20,925 110 190 26 20,770 110 198 27 21,565 115 200 28 23,700 115 204 29 24,800 121 205 30 24,800 125 210 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM - --DATE:- - -- May -1-5,- 1.995- - - -.. — - — - - - - - - - - TO: Craig Larsen, City Planner FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer SUBJECT: Mirror Oaks After a preliminary review of the plan, listed below are my comments: A. A different stormwater management plan is necessary. The pond to the south is landlocked and not a good solution. B. The watermain needs to'be looped from Scriver Road. C. The project must have an erosion control plan developed according to PCA's best management practices. D. The project also needs a watershed permit from Nine Mile Creek. E. Any use of boulder. retaining "walls must be on private property. Not acceptable on the right- of -way.— 5124 South Blake Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 Roy K. Jenson May 20, 1995 Mr. Craig Larson City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina. MN 55424 Reference: Proposed Subdivision - Mirror Oaks Mirror Oaks Grading & Erosion Control Plan dated 417/95 Dear Mr. Larson, 612 - 935 -1825 All of us that have lived in this relatively secluded area for many years are loathe to see a potential subdivision with it's attendant construction activities, loss of wildlife, and loss of the 'living in the country' feeling. None the less, a property owner has the right to develop his property within the constraints of minimal governmental regulation. This proposal has many good attributes including large, stately lots, minimal tree removal,and minimal mass grading. My general approval of the overall concept is tempered by the following relatively technical but significant comments: Storm Water Control The proposal shows a change of drainage patterns that is completely unacceptable to property owners generally to the south and southeast that have property abuting the pond on the south. The subject pond currently has a total watershed of approximately 5 acres, a water surface area of approximately 2 acres, and no natural outlet. The proposed development will almost triple the this watershed by adding approximately 7 to 9 acres of high runoff watershed to the pond. Since the heavy clay soil has virtually no absorption capability, substantial rains over a period of weeks will cause water level changes of 5 to 6 times the total rainfall and thus flooded back yards around the pond. The existing plot has drainage generally to the north to Mirror Lake and to the pond on the West at 5025 Schafer Road. The existing elevations require water to rise above 945 elevations within approximately 200 feet of the southern pond before drainage will occur to the southern pond. This is clearly higher than runoff points located on Scriver Road, 5025 Schafer Road, or Blake Road/Mirror Lake. Storm Water Pollution The no outlet nature of the pond to the south makes it extremely susceptible to nutrient concentration and excessive vegetation. (Algae, Wolf ia, Bull Rush, and Cattails) Addition of storm water contaminated with lawn fertilizer and herbicides will certainly exacerbate the problem. page 2 Building Setbacks It has been the usual practice in Edina to have relatively equal building setbacks. This plan shows relatively wide variations in setbacks. Through Street Desi It has been the usual design principle in Edina to strongly suggest the use of through streets for safety and maintenance purposes. This proposal shows two cul -de -sacs located within 100 feet of each other, a elevation difference of less than 5 feet, and no major design issues to preclude a through street. Lot Design & Location It is appropriate to design each lot for accessibility, privacy, etc. Lot 4 will have a cul -de- sac located within 50 feet of the back door of this house with automobile headlights sweeping the entire length of the house. While such design is completely within the the developer's domain. I would hate to see a repeat of a similar design at the Evanswood Gui- de -sac. Please forward these comments to the appropriate review board(s) and the city council for their review prior to any approval process. I thank you in advance for your consideration of my concerns. Sincerely yours, L Roy K.Jenson cc: George W. Stickney Stickney & Schwarz Builders, Inc. 30x7 Manitoba Avenue South Wayzata. MN 55391 Barr Engineering Company May 11, 1995 8300 Norman Center Dnve 555 West 27th Street Minneapolis, MN 55437 -1026 Hibbing, MN 55746 Phone: (612) 832 -2600 Phone: (218) 262 -3465 Fax: (612) 832 -2601 Fax: (218) 262 -3460 Mr. Richard Bloom 6020 Chasewood Parkway #201 Minnetonka, MN 55343 RE: 5000 Blake Road Wetland Delineation - Edina, Minnesota (Barr Project #23/27 -743) Dear Mr. Bloom: As requested, Barr Engineering Company (Barr) has completed a wetland delineation project for the Groves/Stickney project site (herein, "the property ") located in T117N, R21W, Section 30. The property is situated on the west side of Blake Road and south of Interlachen Boulevard and is within the boundaries of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The current street address for the property is 5000 Blake Road, Edina Minnesota (see attached site location figure). The purpose of this letter is to present the findings of Ban's wetland delineation project. Two wetland areas have been identified and delineated on the property. Wetland Delineation and Classification Method All wetlands within the defined study area were identified and delineated in a manner consistent with the routine on -site determination method specified in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1989 Edition). The delineations are also consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Edition). The wetland boundaries were delineated with stakes which were placed at intervals between approximately 30 and 200 feet. The field delineation stakes were surveyed and plotted on a topographic map by Hedlund Engineering, Inc., entitled "Edina Site Wetland Delineation Plot" (attached). The identified wetlands were classified using both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39 System (Types 1, 2, 3, etc.) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cowardin System (PEMB, PSSC, PFOB, etc.). Information on soil types on the project site was obtained from the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soils map for Hennepin County. In addition, soil borings were placed in several locations on the project site in areas of wetland and upland. Representative soil samples from each boring were examined for hydric soil indicators. Mr. Richard Bloom May 11, 1995 Page 2 General Setting and Background Data The property is approximately 9 acres in size and currently comprises one residence and a wooded yard. The property is adjoined on the west and east by residential property, on the north by Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard, and on the south by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) protected wetland 781 -W (M )NR Protected Waters and Wetlands Map). The MDNR has not established an ordinary high water level for the MDNR - protected wetland area. The SCS soils map indicated the presence of the Hayden Loam soil series on the property, with a range of 2 -18 percent slopes. Hayden Loam is not listed as hydric soils on the National Hydric Soils List (1992). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map indicated the presence of two wetland areas on the property. One wetland area on the southern edge of the property is identified on the NWI map as a palustrine unconsolidated bottom wetland area with an intermittently exposed water regime (PUBG). The location of this PUBG wetland area coincides with the location of MDNR #781 -M. The second wetland area indicated by the NWI map for the property is a palustrine unconsolidated bottom wetland area with a semipermanently flooded water regime (PUBF). This PUBF wetland area is located in the southwestern portion of the property. The NWI map did not indicate the presence of any other wetland areas on the property. Site Visit During Barr's site visit, two wetland areas were identified and delineated (see attached wetland data forms). One area was a type 4 wetland. The other area was a type 3 wetland with an adjoining type 2 component (type 3/2). Type 4 Wetland The wetland area identified on the southern edge of the property is a type 4 deep freshwater marsh wetland. The location of this type 4 wetland corresponds with the location of the PUBG wetland area presented on the NWI map and the MDNR 781 -W wetland area. Open water was evident at in this type 4 wetland. Topography at the upland edge of this type 4 wetland is steeply sloped. The delineation line determined for this type 4 wetland was generally consistent with topographic contours. Specific stake placement along the delineation line of this type 4 wetland was selected based upon both vegetation criteria and soils indicators. Dominant vegetation on the wetland side of the delineation line was reed canary grass. Dominant vegetation on the upland side of the delineation line was red oak trees. Mr. Richard Bloom May 11, 1995 Page 3 Type 3/2 Wetland The wetland area identified in the southwestern portion of the property is a small type 3 shallow freshwater marsh wetland with a very small type 2 wet meadow wetland component. The location of this type 3/2 wetland corresponds with the location of the PUBF wetland area on the NWI map. Open water was evident at in this type 3/2 wetland. Topography at the upland edge of this type 3/2 wetland is gently to steeply sloped. The delineation line determined for this type 3/2 wetland was generally consistent with topographic contours. One area where the delineation line was as determined is not consistent with the topographic contours is a small land area dominated by reed canary grass which exhibited indicators of hydric soils criteria up the slope to a location as much as 3.1 feet higher in elevation than other wetland delineation boundary stakes. The hydric soils indicators in this small area are apparently the result of groundwater seepage from this steep portion of the hill side. Specific stake placement along the delineation line of this type 3/2 wetland was selected based primarily upon hydric soils indicators. Generally, dominant vegetation on the wetland side of the delineation line was reed canary grass. Dominant vegetation on the upland side of this the delineation line was mixed hardwood forest including red oak trees. Regulatory Requirements The placement of fill material into wetlands and the excavation of wetlands are regulated by the ACOE under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The filling and draining of wetlands are also regulated by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District under the authority of the MWCA. Both the ACOE and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District should be contacted prior to the alteration of wetlands on the site. If you have any questions regarding the results of this wetland delineation, please contact me at (612) 832 -2815. Sincerely, Charley Kubler Environmental Scientist LCKpls Enclosures 10 Q:\DOCS\25780-1 lk J-mr.�7, liv. - W 0 11 ®RIA ME I INS 1,7W Y �. -�sv . -"I- Im- � -9 l ,IILE���11 =Ill _ c1m SITE 3 � � l R OR OAKS'° CITY 00 EDINA LEGAL DESCRIPTION tats 21120 of "I"A's SlDIVISI01 LOT 8LO:R 50. FT, . t - 39.574 - M132E. City Of Eelae . Hseveln comty 2 1 33.716 3 t 30.056 3 1 32.276 elontllots ass fllaslvllq Unlels" of IYCM'6 • t 30. 867 t 1 t 30. •62 5 11.018 5.00 $ fi 37.171 o.. °o x LOCATION NAP / / I I I r , l I I SITE DATA =mo EXISTING 20!11 NO Al f- PROPOSED ZONING Rt °unoea° EXISTING LA USE SINGLE DW[]11NG ID PROPOSED LAD USE : SINGLE DWELLING c n- / e�ia I I I \ \ I SOtIAitE FEET• ACRE"• / TOTAL SITE AREA 439.746 10.10 STRREETLR/W AREA A& 359 1. 00 0 0' I ^ ]J AVERAGE LOT SIZE 38. 033 .83 u TOTAL WO OF LOTS : It W026'28'E 910.00 NET UNIT DENSITY 1.21 LINITS /ACRE m / = �— I �— ---- - - - - -- a 16a4 _ t'YIYAiE 4D �— — BLOCK I I i Ik IE UTILITY EASD6]IEti /r/ \ fIT IIf.TD) I N9EX o 3 & 4 COVER SHEET /PRELIM. PLAT ti4� II II 1 / / d}- GRADING & EROS I'ON CONTROL 2 el_1 f ,60. 0 !. ?,\ X90 °'•'\ — — / �/ / �\ wIE - / `� — — �.• y 3.) PRELIM. UTILITY PLAN , = c tam e e' 4.) EXISTING CONDITIONS EXIST. TREE SURVEY m A5 ►', S/ \ °•+; \ III III N 1A � . ` ! mom: 'f Cd d oo i �� 11 a I LYJ i � I �1 I WI 8 I � 10 I I EO I I I I 1 \ T r-I A + I IV 1 I L= rl1'•St_H31 FI I I � I I I � I . s � 506• I`. 30 6.0 sao'6t'5fi'Y 399.21 f 077Y U �0 !•6.6 L•L2 O,o `bo• • ~ I I OAK 00 6 /) .l'91rt9 /((• /S. S ' 146,0D.o,E BSO R.176.0 6.66'11% Jar�E a I I III 111 I I s s 1b * I I n `t " 11 11 I WETLAN 1 1 1 1111 FIELD OELINu1TED I I , taETIND J L__ 1. 1 an — — — J -1..- — — • — 217 6 I - .: • I ISW 26'28' Y 799.08 I I I I I I I f r3 l L7 L 17 - I I J1 I r I �. L- I I I i I I PAR' OR .. I I I I I I I LOT 7 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I LOT TABULATION LOT 8LO:R 50. FT, . t - 39.574 t 1 32.026 H t 30.010 2 1 33.716 3 t 30.056 3 1 32.276 10 1 30.091 • t 30. 867 t 1 t 30. •62 5 11.018 5.00 $ fi 37.171 e - e o all, 4 �� po CL T m DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS � a J Y o s W ARE SHOWN THUS: Q = 5.00 $ x BelnO 5 feet in :loth and adl01. Ing cc W C, � o lot Ilnes. unless otnsrwl es shorn and Q W� CC t0 feet In width and adlolnlnp street IIn a unless otherwise $noun on this co plat. i.i F a etnr asw 50 0 50 too ISO 94M "em`s i SCALE IN FEET. SCALE: t INCH • 50 FEET DATE: APRIL 24. 1995 -7 -95 OINIIES ran DEO::IES NMI . rrM Ilw•iL 11110" 11 lot L'wO ` IINSm • DEN misE I - - - d u rtlMlr rear n'rnc ,rsf irlm I I ,•YE 1 011111 E/w91 Ilr /0Y• I., ISM, rm•ell o, Wn,NI"o" mum11Ir..c"ULE SE r/ 1 MINIM 01910 claw IM■ Sc S IIt 11.SN _. Moto INLINDIES sr1.c"K nrM form meolr IDIIRD F 101 IS LII(NO (m flllExl ILm 6947.7 I e 4f— I,n ra. RILIr i0 LIVIM AML nrus IEIttIn ' rl1wr11100"1 am. -= '� I -F b OF rrwltlm IIIMIR II LI'laEll ou,rtr u0" - --- �� rrn rc► KTUM MAR 0 OAKS CITY OF N01NA GENERAL GRAU-ING NOTES: " 1.1 rmltlr VErW11O111° . iR IMmii vlr� anue LI 01U rAln 1FV KAr;milI f 9111 o EDIr oniMMO a° u - - y (19E r / \ °i ticakat k n EiO�°uairm —+ a 11 tnr aElwea�or� INV W+ \ ♦ 1 rltDlr 1/r rE roI ML 1010E u i MUM m ik"iLIE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL / / ' / \ L 1 YL rrwM IrAS 011910 OF IE S1r11 NIGHT m pr &At IT 1 — rral {M NIrm IN ISIS lfll11W MINIM I . --- - — — — — — — — T- — �• — — — — — — �''— — — •r — — — — — �" rr an iO1 IN {N SPECIFICATION R to 111t1w NI .rs1 1{Im 1/ / I_ / 1 n11111r ntw a YrNII 1 {II YFM MIN /r0" ur r °SOIa lE�r1➢ ILL SITE MUM Ass ICY n alwl nL / 11110 NLLd rlul t W[r tl ENL rll' r 1 1/1 I0" 0111 im / / // / 1 I I I 1 I i L / / I I S Nero NIIY { ilYlrl, Lt"10 r0" ar IRDI r1t E 6RO iSMALL N1rr /el trLIMKI1r tOEOel {i a 1 ` I Iptl rltlr NIL S ALL {ru Ir 1 Ia11 NIINr NuN rMEt / / /' I - I r • � i / [ I I ®wilNIrouf ° NN A NO IN V= F 1911 ""MN I, IN goo I■ YES rl[Ko ar 1 ram R I I a WAILII YI Y ALSIM ' [ /,' / I 1 r• / / I I IT IT ® r Ft1ES rMEIL —tool or Nooe Oost / I fnur 10Or1■ 111.1111.0 to Post So"Ure �� / / `/� , \�^ I I I I l•;I I `1 I II L.r or Fall In trLMn ,p NIn. Nip .1 /l[ ' I`1 I / I U. 111 rot oll �. �� [•� / [ / % ti I I O V oIa L•■a• tr11nen r na Mwo / I 1• v '''1 I' , I P L._ tII Oar In .� /. 1 E I'ORART RU(:K / / / I I r r r.. ,/ ._ I + 'r .r. ~ 100 er NLrlc and CCIS1Rl1CTION ENTRANCE = �':, - - - -' _ _ — - - - - -- _ 1.5 t.w..t snN Ball pr ' 'r� f1 .935 IB ER`''�I �I �� -r�.0 I rlill i 3��` U ,v ° S ,�--r +� 1,..'L�. 'i, .� /;r�T�}I',1` SILT FENCE TYPICAL r / I I 'h1 ! rl • ':fl '1 4. `I'��(�',It r , vr'• e /. •L , i/� / / '\ r i . }rrp;' rfIELD DELINEATED / 1 I >.Y 1.U1.LD f,.•.( rt' � UTLaO MO Lc.• *.> �' i.1 / I II': r .ti 1 /' l�f' "'1 19, FED• / •'l allD r I ,,• 1 d4� � �� / I gta►p' ,4 •/ .�, �1 /' •\� / 1/ e ' 1i III a` ( I3C \ 190. 9 / I, ) j• -'/ 'k /.i/ ��� 10p ,i•F - /L�.' � r ' . ,�Y k 1 }�.' , .: � �'I t _ . , {fj3.5 Cf �� I ,/ r 1, �•(� �,� � a � \� [ • �' ,� � 1 .��- ' ���t� , a ., .� y, o _ •/ '.;,, �. ,�(� r�l(� � /,� VkT � Ilt v �� r fli •.I - - - - -�- I �. �� rv�' I r TL...,�5 2 m .l 7111 �., ,} ,.f�-•1 `��! -.:�f• ��• 1' '4C /� •R ,/ �..,1 -,'� m h y�/•�' ti I , �' • EAEE9 1 / y '3/ 1 1N !! f i GItDIfV�I� MIT'' / I t 7 1 %/ ` 1111E I II` / f I / I 1 - -- „a J,�/ /�'! ` 11 , [ r,J`.. 'Ir ' [.■` - r / J •' I $I 4 1' (� ''% ' - 1 /' LMttLe TI nt S 5. .� /1 1 j / I \� I / j • 1 I I .I 'i• h D Eu ■o In canter . _ -� _ i � � / ,* _' f'c1. 1• . � .��yy' ,}-/, �' � _•. 1” ! ';/� �,-� r � 1. �. 'o; 1��•' 'H.� ' d i-` �.: • I t'' ,'�..� T,, ;.� , , Ewn M1. I lie 1 / . I''. I ,I I ' y t -�' I i 1 F., 4 !� i )d, I /iii / e • `4' HA BA FjE e • 91i3 S' t ! ' 1 (. ;' 1, 1 j ! "1• / l� / ` I �!,a S I e • - -� � � ,��, � [ /� '. /�` [� y/-;C7 lI'I. \ \DAM it l I• -4-' ,r' I I�I •/ ,i' I � •.�„ il, "y , 1, �' y y �'I j F � 1 � � ? iil ��-� ' 4.� I I I _ ¢q, ./ ; � .r. \ \\ `C—__ I 1 �.� , Ij � � 1� __ u, I `: �I. L .'� ?.1'.•A � .� :` � `, � /I I / c .+ ( / {{a �s '•'r�� �[ �. /A' \` %� � 1 [f' ( ',� I��oT � /'' .w •'' � ' f..' 'T .( / I ,r, ;� �f', •,I` II �I' �.n �,r l�, � I'I ,�` E % `\.:rl �•% I I \ .- Sn11.r.neo for slit FoncN IMn Morane. l 1 LAN 57,,11`:1 .1` 1 t / sumo Lno.nne. la Lnt G ' .1' I. . '� / I l / I I , F.nu Nnw .oNroru. I 1 /' S � 7.?� � ' -�U , [ j..l —I _ _ t x , ,I/J'��� i , / I � , ,��(N/, �,I Ld' �'� +•I i` / / I [ I ,' / � •l... i n l ''# i S• j � 1 / /� �i , \..\ L' , 411 I -.' ��/`` - I [ ! a� I ' 1 1 �1: 1 I I .' � ii /� � •'i \ I,t 1 FL..�..C./ [� 1 / /` utor �- ,QN.. ' at 91111111 @111111 •r� N; Y I•'�I'ai z 0 i u LL a u O G i m eo >• N °\ .m LLO I_ F 1� o ° °a m cc°cn ToFm W e=m " c_ o� a e °D C L C Wro e oe a NOC io n ama W µa n 1 I J:I 1 1 - -.- / by �', •- --= i �.— t- c��111 3. ' "Ti \1 k 9�1 lE./' ;t' - / r• _ ►Y- ('m I ;A�ltn' l;,} �; / ',�� /' //Z. {^ I >l -- ,, '� 4'�'"" 11 1� 95►.° G is E~_I1�' SECTION = 1 HAYBALE CHECK DAM a a 910. ` ,- , \ ' I I rN •NANO _j +� cc 10 I� �I• F \ _n 1 � I I I`'��.. Q ^. r' 11111 1 ir'")r',�f•�,` ,�� li �//4', ,' \` °1..` \ I \ t' L' I Z rW- I , \ o � (r I Y _ I I II 1 F.: I '► f .t I :, ;�) . I 111 1 / I :1► ►' �f I I W£TLA N 011 1 I1 ! :•, ;'�\, 'n{�1. i. V 1 �,.�_ FLA�j _, .l 1 Ili''y� -;r -I•�13 I Ili Its FIELD DELINEATED(, ►�' so- 1_7 -- C W - ((- �I 4 f. r..1 /1 111 .If�.1 C. II �E11i EE7LY0 o Y am. E!l 15 ci I 1 'vl,;.- .Y•/• �_ - � I I'( .�`'� � r j ''I . / - .. � —.r 11 - ✓�•. A'�''pylry` %..r1 {�� ",7}I��•.a'p1 1 , - I � _ _. I, I ' ' �: 1 I 1 .,4, T- 1_.- i -� "r-� �-- r- -IL - -" l"11 �''! L,,�•rt�• -- ___J. " - -__J1 >,. ^I_-- y: "�(y�L��t >.,Y' 'I �,4(n' \'+ .,�� 1 I I X61 Q Q ~$_ t y = �- am 1��1�° cc o Q� I' 1 I I' .I °' \ .• •. a i I r I I ([ '� _- -1 I I / I .� I I I \ I T I ►5 S un Vol o l iIT rli_:, .rii =iv- - - - - -- - - ^- I I r; i iia''.�_ I I / 'I J , I I I I ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE j �t III It 1 ' ,` . .\ _ -- '- I - I I' I �, I I ,. , \• - I , - _ I I I I ; ► I 1j, I I I \ I I -��'�� - QI a1EE1 r llr Er a FsM twar q® c P APT • I a 1 t00 150 50 0 50 " 2 SCALE` IN FEET I I I I I I i I I SCALE . 1 INCH 50 .FEET ilk alt 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I � QAT61 � APA I L� 24,; 1 1 - O I:. r Too. �.. ;.T5 LL- 1 I I 1 1 y I ' } ?`SLOPE DATA 7— \ TOTAL SITE AREA 1.1 746• 'hT I / \ AREA OF SLOPES 162: 45.660•IFi( AND GREATER PERCENT OF SITE iIOIYI} -- M /162 SLOPES PERCENT OF LOT :LOT 5 y2 ` M/182 SLOPES LOT 6 221 } 'T - r, LOT 7 232 LOT 172 LOT 1t 392 \ tip TREE DATA: 'r TOTAL NUMBER OF 459 � TREES ON SITE TOTAL LOST TO 29 \< ' MASS GRADING — _ — — — `�_ PERCENT OF LOSS - .-- _ _ _ - - - - -- I R-R ®R OAKS CITY OF EDINA I i � I I ... - - -� . I \ \ C', I Fn / n sn 120 180 — (p— FEET 1 INCH - !00 FEET APRIL 24, 1995 91111111 nlll� N IYV« e00L A 0« o o z pe97Y c c Cn c o- « L « J �°aNY l _ �aY « ■ Y A N L J J a. c uao Yc a L YLm L 0 v LL Q u 0 t i N AO i� Ym C LLY L ooa � °oN CCG m W o o : m m c.+ a� o n em c .- c . A N�C s n mma m W 6 W a 0 J o O W J � — W W _ cc J ¢ td � 2 g in Z o U •° Y .< O [n - p u) 2 41 o o =W CC N Cr LD S W � W � a WAM IMCKEPIKSIGN B, SHEET N"EN 4 PATE 4 -7 -95 / - - -- ---- - --� -- �I J _ I _ 15' MIN. TREE (% PRESERVATION J I LINE— -� 7VI �1k4 /✓ [/ ,r r � µ �'SS � � ��,; � � r-� { ,. /r'Y°rk ��,,�' �!1 r �' ,,,,° �i - -f' �.Ja -.4-I .✓ r '� (L i... – — _ <.!- �� ..i�..�;y�., -, ` _ 1�11�' L' 1� ��„r�• � °�,, „, ^� a� < ,ter, � "( _ _ -rt'-Tt�.,,� - ` �� -'` ;/- -rx //� -- � %� I �'?�,�% ✓ rx_ r' 'r ' \(✓ J � \c^ — � �~ �.L" ,,ycr`f� —.� .•' ,T�y..;�1 �'y�,,fe7,a'7'•� i '_, I/. '+ ,, 16'��r �'�,. � ,,rfq� S /\ � �” \S � I /N'� .�{ ! '4.'i .v''' r '' -��•r _^��rr..-,+ �-' i <...T" '� S3�"� .�"ir'r' I.�+,_,'[_ -_. /I �Y', +1 it I J li •,� , ,� -" /, � � `h _ j' I Iii/ i �` - .. -',� ) x.._f —� _.,� „ ��.ktyir y1_�' �'�s ♦I ;.: 7t / I //� ..I�;� .r � I I II •` — — /: � � I r ,r 1 ,"f'. ; 1 � �;y \\\�1i, ' .� ; r' .�/'. /� :.'— ^ /'`�. "t '-"' I -'`' : ;'�'° _ . 11,,E '�'�-, �,^� ,�1� {r', - _.. _� _ __ �,• �/ 1 �- � ii'Y R � ' ) _.,�� - [ _ __- ��. ^'t'rrl•,. / 1 1 ! '�' r� � K 4.��� p_ 1 �/. .�J /�r'�' � // - _. _ I I , - 1 ,J I ,,I 1 `♦+v h n 1�-•., - C _.__ ._.,_ _ - _l�-1 L41 III II II I I I I I �I I I II, I I I i I I I I PPOJECT "UMBEP I MIRROR OAKS 95!011 CITY OF EDINA m� Wx LLa a u LL l U e � r 0 oN f O LL� z a" �.. ml � ON Ocol 0 WN O eml G W�oi m `9 000 L mom O a IL m 4 J �I La �I W cn Z y n = o AO cc X_ WTit Q Z --I& 1 Q M r.D d S N � LL O � I � � CL m a 50 0 50 t00 150 SHEET "BEP i SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET o.TE DATE: APRIL 24, 1995 -7 -95 ' � I / J A / I 7 EX SAM EH IM69a. 2. INY•90a. 07. ` I Iy G•921.5 ,/ / / i FES• v-- - - - - -� r - - — — — - -- - - - - -- — 907.0. — — �— f 4 oP /`1'"ti =92&8 BLOCK POND \\�Ul 3 94- FES• / _ 6-916 6 \ 910. a6 940.2 4 / / 0P /1!:. �a EX SAW MN S + 6.917.8 1.1 + Sm I'M" 11 6971.3 / 1.911.3 \ ,� III III / 6.97_15 ` 1 \ \ 11.9113 I �m 0 -------------- 8; T•90i 0 MIRROR OJIKS ��:�� CITY OF ED 111A m a LEGEND: - EXISTING CONTOUR X -910. 7 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION n a —�° 4--- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Ll EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER — X —X —X— EXISTING FENCE E --E —E— OVERHEAD POWER LIWE PROPOSED a• SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER I + ) _ I WA MAIN 0 6.95D. 6 / a v e'o W a a-16 c�o C iaz mU W- 0 000 10 a amp I— — — — — — — / /� T•93S 5 I II M191d 0 { I ( I• III 6.918.8 r- J I I 1.912.0 � m 7 \ 3 FES- I I I 3� I I 9 .. I I 8 7 -91.6 1�1 1' 1.99112 7.7 910.3 U o `` `I I I• 11 \ + Z W I f- 1 Q I io III I 1 N, I J - f! W I III ` III i I WV*LAf4 a J ELEV 3L 0M 11120/95' I - I y J q�� I Y _IL — - - - - - � L - - - - - - cc I: cL � o J i:J o�nc _ W I I I I I I I I I d 0W G I I I A I T f' 11 1 A l f' A I 1 I f. r' I I H I I V I L. F'. L_ r% 1 rl L. I V I I I�� I L I ,: L_ r-- J I I auw ICHECKWIGH11M I ` I I =' 50 0 50 100 15 a SIEET HUMER I .yi I I I I 3 SCALE. IN FEET DATES' 1 I APRIL 24. 1995 1 7 95 i tee �4���I�1I_�I�j. �If1�������1�111I'II�I Nz 7'lr w�- 41. 7�1 A W"% "'fr firr) ,1' y W w w w W w 6wI."fTT__ Povwpezri U,17H, fVLLY -fzgg� 6a--J'7 ­- U, P� i-�A 14 P LA (,TA Foo Eft-) PACVVA Fg& 109 MA4%t- VAIL4-TIe6, 04"" NO*- F4u4f re*JV>. !.r4EA- 8I gzA+ If _ R CH "Ll: J 1 A l 0.OAK 16�IN NF,OVl !2 V1 11AK.. ._ \4 I 8 N OAK 15 A ud}S. ;:ri N SPRQ< ? BIN SPRUCE 14 q\ \OAK I- w nAK 9.R UAKL5.N OAK 17•X OAK 1_ )b w 0, 12 ill SPRLLI E I } N OAK tr 2 \ 0.:W OAK 4 \ P .. .. ;. N ...OAK r I -�11 L r p N \\ fi_LDf,U51 I r 1! fi y' N, � gg `f9-1! PFLR .IdJN SA CF.d4t27".I17 YAW \\ 23 R OAK i.- N OAK N� R OAK II SPRC 1Z'N SPRC ..' 14 N OAK tF l H OAK 16 N OK 8-7 U S PRf 2IN SPRUC tblN. lJ�h 10 -10-11 BIRCH ;� fn w OAK N 0* A OAK I '•2.11 ^. SFRL'G= I7IN N OA #„ - p 16 2D R OAK 2t N OAK 1 61N W OAK ' 141N R fWB 16 N.Ot N OAK It H OAK 7AK f ! N;.i ' ?1 N'LAK �4K I i SPRC 1518 SPRUf, 12114 SPR0I116114 X @AK U , 1 IOIN SPR(Iq," w q`V1N St !4fN SPRUC 121 fc 1`11. W ,.AK � �'lN 5PRUCi_ ,r. Ri; `2L 221N'X OAK 201N N OAK N SPFt'.. 12.16114 CEDAR WW .00AAK t61N N. OAK \ -' .. - _ : ;:c . Po - - — - - -- v W OAK - - T - 161N SPRUC\ v N t r -- IbIN SPRUCE 16114 X. OAK 16114 it OAK 24114 W OAK . ` ,• a „JAIN SPRUCE 14IN WIN W. OAK 141N W'. DAY ` \ '_� : N 11 r 10114 H OAK r 141N W..OAK ,�,r. \ s ld h Pat /;;E 1014 5K'RU,:[ WIN SPRUCE -- JOIN W. OAK '74114:" 161N H. OAK IN M. OAK 14114 W. OAK 112114 W. OAK 161NNd BIN N. OAK 24IN N ner y� 24114 ROAN 161N;12A OAK o ., ,� w. �:... j 1111! r• ,, AF ;\ Y k 15114 R.OAK r'� N. -i 16114 N OAK - X� d 14114 w OAK S l j' " K !h SPNUCEIGIN W K 11�IfM0..*K - 14114 Ft.Mr .hc.'•. x+'' 1 1.f M Y�, "A,iN A Op�UIN N nAK IhIW4RN I1kCAK W f t21N N OAK 12114 N 0 K ))) a t2IN W OAK .IN N. OAK IGIN R.OAK ; * I• J.. N W ')AK - 221N R, OAK' 12114 N, OAK 1514 W ;A• � A - 1ti1 N W.OAK 201N It OAK _. 18114.X. CA` • 1 i n - "iIN.N. OAK NLN N 1 t !M N. UAA' 20114 R. Ahh'� .. --- __ :FIN ,:e. 1.INN O0. t,. IN H. OAR 1 N-i� - - r!% r N OAF 201N•R. OA IGIN BWELI)L i ' �1 � "IUIN N. OAK „ 15IN H "A. IGlrl W OAK q 'rf,F IWN M. OAK 4� - 1d1 61 OAK j 24 IN A:_DAY ,,f IN SARIICE 401N I;Oi L:4NLUC {) ,, 101 I* 121N N OAK up f -- -- 11;!r, N nav 101 'IK.OAK ?�4IN COTTiNI,I {s l,; _I a - I II Y N\. r \... -( Ilr .'fEI+F'N-1Mh;- 114N�1. -0+t1C_— - - ---- -. - - --! 44 4. AK 12114 W 14yy1121N W OAK I � N. OAK 12!14 N DAK W OAK CIN r JAK IIAIIN N AY. WIN N DAMN W. OAK dIN MAPLE 6 N -DAK' N 'AK ,., `'� L61NW:pAK. f51N H r1AK' 10114 R. OAK 16114 X OAK 301N Nt S . n l 28114 le If N. OAK 121N M. OAK' 444R'1W. OAK 12114 W 9AK 24 rl M, OAK 1!rI H 04K � '.1!N,W.OAK 'q -• J v7:i 1l. 1i •�� �A'I��Z 18114 M, OAK I?IN N. OAK IZIN hW. UA S'hl 1.4114 N. f1,PIN W. AK _f'Ci-�a tOIM N. OA JAIN .OAK _. _.' ✓' -:i I ) 1.:.., 16IN W.OAK 141N W.4AV 181N N OAK t61N W.9Y �} A, 2arN N OAK 94 104N SPRUCE 1 Y� WIN W.OAK i - 141N W. OAK -? r -, pFp 1FJJ!i W. i }Ak 44114 N, OAK GIN SPRUCE J61N w.UAK 12114 N OAK SPRUCE 141N W. OAK ? "i N. OAK -161AL -UAX — - - —'- - -- , . -JAN j! .N N r'• 14114 W.., •., ? "! SPRUCE nrN W OAK !4114 X RAK ia:'. N OAK at .OAK. tAIN N OAK 141N N. OAK S �� -IBIN N. OAK 14114,11. OAK ir't �f q 141N W OAK ,r^' \�. x 181 N. GAY 7 18.14 N.OIijC�O J fl ,� } �. ✓ c4tf �i 24IN W OAK ty n Yt 261 ? ti i W q -IN OAK i 14114 W.OAK %<,r / OaK ^�,. ,yIF, N ,� %ill14114 N. UAK 15114 N. OAK • •u!N p;. 161N W.OAK ,ii W OAK �� � •_ 91N'l�r� I I N N. OAS --- -- / 24IN W.OAKi221N H OA! Ii}N2�14AG OAr IONS 16114 Elie 9Q 20!u M x121 1„ A Ak '~ ♦ + �p +'. 30' N DINE BIN t�IFf KN OA, { ` w : A4 {, a� 61111, 114 %ELDER �1t9 I� i U, ?� �,61N BOXELDER x.n,7 It 'Ir � [4114 N OAK 20114 N OA° - t01N ELM / Y � 16114 R. OAK / ^1. I ,.OAK '� 16IIJ W: OAh( ( t4 S N �, i \ A N �OXELOE 1DIN FLM J IGIN XELO IN bD %EIDER •.. 20114 -N.QAK Y tfA,f U ' 111 [1 { \ • i� H t e, r (0o 181NN OAN r[ k ,/ i 1 ' 16114 N. OAK 12114 BUXFLDEI7 7 ?} `) �. ' 16114 R. DAK � ) .OAK i 7r'1(1 BOXELDER 0 OAK 12IN MAP 8114 N.OAY, ON HAPLE NIN +Arid l41 IN XAPLE t IN MAPLE - 10114 MAPLE 81N MAPLti }fi ":.1}pA17 '' 14114 N.OAp. -.. �� WIN MAPLE BIN MA^ F BIN,MAPLF t 1 l�N OA! (? 1'6114 W GAY IGIN X 2 MAPLE pp�g PLE BIN MAPLE SIN MAPLE L ^i i l6i M O'A"�� � "� '141N W.OAK /BIN MAPLE 10It�NAPL IO1N MAPLE BIN MAPLE / ,t \ l.f I51gN 1`1. T IA K161N'W.OAK i f1 181N W OAK 241N A. QA \ 121'{ N. nAB. 16'14 W. OAK - - - 61M N.GAK 1 JOIN N OAK 2 121N W. OAL 741N W. OAK 101N W. OAK 161N B.OAK - 16tN1l.OAe41N X. OAK. BIN W, O K 221N i .OAK •.'1N WALNUT 24IN X. 0 . 181N . N. OAK \\ i6itl N.OAK 121N.11 OAK 16114 kw " 121N N OAK '950 - WNW OAK ^ v \ 161N N.OAK 5114 W OAK \\ 16IN W,DAK !BIN N OAK 16111 N OAK 12ik -W-� i ASH \' ifiiM W. OAK 161N'W, ?'AK E / 1414 W OAw t5 N. OAK \ t6IN N. OAK SOIN N.M. 101N W.OIK 2OIN N�Kt41N N OAK -. -, 16,11 -W.OAK \\2lRXOAK.f`•. 't. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Gordon Hughes DATE: June 19, 1995 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 1995 -3. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A TWO - YEAR FRANCHISE TO NORTHERN STATES POWER Agenda Item # ° II.A. Consent ❑ ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution X❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Continue until July 3, 1995. Info /Background: The City Council considered Ordinance No. 1995 -3 at the May 15, 1995, City Council meeting. The Council directed staff to enter into further negotiations with NSP with respect to the franchise fee provision of the ordinance. Staff has met with representatives of NSP on several occasions since May 15th. At this time, however; we have not reached an agreement which satisfies our mutual interests. We recommend a two -week continuance for further negotiations. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: , Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: June 19, 1995 SUBJECT: Street Name Change: West 50th Street to Interlachen Boulevard. Recommendation: Grant Second Reading to Ordinance. Info /Background: Agenda Item # I I. B. Fl. Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends To HRA x❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution x❑ Ordinance Ej Discussion The City Council granted first reading to the Ordinance on June 5, 1995. ORDINANCE NO. 1995 - 5 STREET NAME ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. The roadway from Arcadia Avenue to Vernon Avenue is hereby named "Interlachen Boulevard." Section 2. The Ordinance shall be in full force and effective upon passage and publication. First Reading: June 5, 1995 Second Reading: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk �41 o � jl2 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000. DATE. June 15, 1995 ITEM DESCRIPTION: AMBULANCE Company 1. McCoy Miller 2. Wheeled Coach 3. Road Rescue '4. Braun 5. Lifeline RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Braun - -- $86,700.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM I I I. A. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $80,034.00 2. $84,996.00 3. $85,998.00 4. $ 86,700.00 5. $87,828.00 This recommendation is the result of a thorough evaluation of each bid proposal by our design committee. A detailed summary of their analysis is attached. This ambulance is a replacement for a 1987 Ford E -350, originally scheduled and budgeted in Equipment Replacement Plan for 1995. In developing specifications for this ambulance, the Ambulance Committee modified and improved our 1994 specification package. Our specifications are unique because our joint fire /ems responsibilities require larger �ay3pads and different equipment storage configurations to meet local needs. � 0 Signa The Recommended bid is within budget not FIRE Department �, Director Kenneth MEMORANDUM DATE: June 2, 1995 1 TO: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief to FROM: Jeff Siems, Ambulance Co ittee Chair SUBJECT: AMBULANCE PURCHASE RECOMMENDATION At your direction, in January of 1995, the Fire Department established an ambulance design (specification) committee . This committee consists of seven paramedics and one shop mechanic, representing a cross- section of EMS experience with a variety of ambulance designs and services. Our committee developed the new 1995 specifications following an assessment of our 1994 ambulance purchase, factoring in several changes to improve the basic design. In the course of this process, we determined the 1994 vehicle to be a good quality /serviceability product. As a result, the 1995 specifications are fundamentally an extension of the 1994 design. The specifications were finaled in April by our committee, and requests for bids went out Wednesday, May 10, 1995. Five bids were received and opened on Thursday, May 25, 1995. Following our analysis (attached) of the five ambulance bid proposals, it is our recommendation to purchase the "BRAUN ", at $86,700.00. While this is not the lowest bid ambulance, it is the lowest bid that complies with all of our specifications with no exceptions. Our committee defined the following six specification areas as fundamental to our design needs. They represent areas /problems that these specifications were designed to correct: 1) PAYLOAD: Specifications call for a minimum payload of 1600 pounds. Our experience has suggested that overloading (exceeding payload) has been a factor in mechanical failures and breakdowns. In our judgement, a lighter weight vehicle will increase available payload and should improve vehicle performance, particularly braking and handling. 2) BODY CONSTRUCTION: This item is inter - related with weight and safety. In order to reduce weight yet maintain strength, it is necessary to use different construction techniques. "BRAUN" has provided a "unitized" design. By using a single folded sheet of metal, they have achieved a lighter weight vehicle, while maintaining structural strength and crash worthiness. 3) REAR DOOR SIZE: A key element to our design is the larger rear doors. This is critical to improve access for rescue equipment stored at the rear of the vehicle and to enable the paramedics to treat multiple patients on back boards. The larger opening makes loading additional patients safer for patients and emergency personnel. 4) ELECTRICAL DESIGN AND LAYOUT: As in our last ambulance purchase, the shop mechanic has recommended a simple, singular electrical "center" design. Our specifications have been written so all major electrical connections are in one area. This provides better access for repairs and servicing electrical controls. This design was included in our specifications to reduce service cost and down time. Memo to Chief Paulfranz June 2, 1995 Page 2 5) SOUND CONTROL AND INSULATION: While this is somewhat subjective, our driving and use of the BRAUN ambulance demonstrated that sprayed urethane insulation method better controlled exterior noise. This sprayed insulation also allows for a air /water tight barrier. This noise reduction is important, as we need to reduce interior noise levels as much as possible to afford improved interior communication. 6) DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LATCHES: Our specifications call for a specific construction of doors, seals, and latches. We have found that exterior doors and cabinets must be carefully constructed to safely protect equipment and personnel from weather and the heavy abuse associated with emergency equipment. In addition to the above, this committee identified a total of sixteen items in its specifications that we believe to be so important to the vehicle that we designated them as "CRITICAL CRITERIA COMPONENTS" in which we would not allow exceptions to in the bidders proposals. They all relate to the above areas of importance in one form or another. The ambulance committee recommends the North Central Ambulance Inc. builders of BRAUN for the award of bids. BRAUN complies with Edina specifications in all areas. ROAD RESCUE, WHEELED COACH, McCOY MILLER, AND LIFELINE ambulance builders took exceptions to our specifications in -areas we judged as critical to our operation. To better understand these concerns, I have included detailed evaluation sheets outlining the exceptions. JWS /ras MODIFICATIONS TO 1994 AMBULANCE SPECIFICATIONS 1) UPDATE TO 1995 MODEL FORD E -350 TURBO DIESEL CHASSIS 2) UPGRADE OUTSIDE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT #4 3) REDESIGN OUTSIDE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT #51s LAYOUT 4) ADD TO MODULE A CAMPER STYLE STEP TO FACILITATE SIDE ENTRY 5) ELIMINATE FOLD UP CABINETS IN MODULE 6) PROVIDE PRIVACY TINTING TO REAR MODULE WINDOWS 7) ADD REMOTE ELECTRIC OXYGEN SWITCH TO FRONT CONTROLS 8) ELIMINATE CITY RADIO SPEAKER TO REAR MODULE AREA 9) ELIMINATE COUNTY RADIO SPEAKER TO FRONT DRIVERS AREA 10) IMPROVE IV RETAINING HANGERS TO PATIENT COMPARTMENT 11) ADD ADDITIONAL 60 INCH GRAB RAIL TO PATIENT COMPARTMENT 12) RELOCATE CAPTAINS CHAIR TO BETTER FACILITATE PATIENT CARE 13) REDESIGN SHELF #5 IN PATIENT COMPARTMENT 14) REDESIGN SHELF #7 IN PATIENT COMPARTMENT 15) REDESIGN SHELF #10 TO PATIENT COMPARTMENT 16) IMPROVED 20 AMP SHORELINE PLUG IN WITH AUTO EJECT SYSTEM 17) UPGRADE TO NEW HIGH IDLE SYSTEM THAT IS FORD OEM 18) UPGRADE 165 AMP LEECE TO 215 AMP MITSUBISHI ALTERNATOR 19) REMOVE STEADY GLOW RED LIGHTS IN LIGHT BAR 20) IMPROVE CENTER ROTATORS IN LIGHT BAR TO "OSCILASER LIGHTS" 21) PROVIDE PUSH BUMPERS TO FRONT AND REAR OF VEHICLE 22) IMPROVE CONTACT POSTS FOR ROOF ANTENNA MOUNTS 23) MODERNIZE GRAPHICS DESIGN FOR AMBULANCE 24) UPDATE AUDIBLE SIREN PACKAGE 25) IMPROVE SIZE OF MAP BOX 26) MODERNIZE FLOOR MATERIAL TO COMPLY WITH OSHA REGULATIONS 27) INCREASE EGRESS ABILITY TO MODULE 28) UPGRADE EMERGENCY SWITCHES 29) IMPROVE STOPPING ABILITY WITH ALL WHEEL ANTI -LOCK BRAKES EVALUATION - AMBULANCE BIDS June 15, 1995 • Drawings Specifications EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS • Chassis • Electrical • Emergency Warning Equipment • Body (Module) • Critical Criteria Total Exceptions: (Note: Some exceptions refer to more than 1 area) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 BRAUN ROAD RESCUE WHEELED COACH MCCOY MILLER LIFELI? PRICE $86,700 $85,998 $84,996 $80,034 87,828 BID INSTRUCTIONS 2 4 0 6 11 • Compliance with 9 0 5 6 5 Specifications Yes No No No No • References Yes Yes Yes Yes No • Drawings Specifications EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS • Chassis • Electrical • Emergency Warning Equipment • Body (Module) • Critical Criteria Total Exceptions: (Note: Some exceptions refer to more than 1 area) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 1 2 1 1 0 5 4 4 4 0 1 2 2 4 0 6 11 14 9 0 5 6 5 3 Comply Not Comply Comply Not 0 22 20 22 13 MAJOR ISSUES • Payload Comply • Sound Control Comply • Electrical Comply • Rear Door Width Comply • Door Construction Comply • Module Construction Comply • Overall Quality 1 (Rated by Committee) TRP2:AMBEVAL.WP Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply Not Comply 2 3 5 4 1 AMBULANCE BID ANALYSIS 1995 MC COY 1VIILLER BIDDER JOE KOUNKEL BID PRICE $80,034.00 CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0300.00 PDQ DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY - 0310.00 MCC DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY - 0370.00 ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS DO NOT COMPLY (USES MULTIPLE AREAS FOR ELECTRICAL PDQ'S) USES INK JET DYED WIRING INSTEAD OF HEAT STAMPED - 0620.00 USES EXTRUDED METAL CONSTRUCTION AND 0.090" ALUMINUM ROOF - 0430.00 USING BIDDERS SPECIFICATIONS SUPPLIED WILL NOT COMPLY WITH FLUORESCENT LIGHTING NON CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0070.00 AIR RIDE ASSIST REAR SUSPENSION - 0470.00 USES WHELEN "LONGHORN" SPEAKERS HAMPERS AIRHORN PLACEMENT - 0630.00 NON SEALING INSULATION (NOISE /WEATHER CONCERN) - 0640.00 USES EXTRUDED DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTER WEIGHT METAL CAUSING SMALLER DOOR OPENINGS. USES ROTARY LATCHES, - 0710.00 USES EXTRUDED DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTER WEIGHT METAL CAUSING SMALLER DOOR OPENINGS - 0730.00 USES DIAMOND PLATE RUB RAILS, NEED REFLECTORIZED TAPE - 0750.00 NON SPECIFIED REAR STEPS - 0790.00 NON SPECIFIED PAINT AND PAINTING PROCESS WITH LESS WARRANTY - 0820.00 USES ALUMINUM FLOOR MATERIAL (INCREASES NOISE DECREASE INSULATION) - 0850.00 USES DIFFERENT CEILING MATERIAL CONDUCIVE TO BBP (ALLOWS TEARING) - 0890.00 HEADLINER UNACCEPTABLE DUE TO BBP POTENTIAL - 0920.00 CAN NOT MAKE STREET SIDE FULL LENGTH SQUAD BENCH WHICH WILL DECREASE PATIENT LOADING AND PATIENT CARE CAPABILITIES - 0940.00 USES PLYWOOD IN CURB SIDE SQUAD BENCH PRODUCTION, POTENTIAL FOR ROT AND BBP SOAKING INTO WOOD - 1010.00 VACUUM ASPIRATOR NOT IN SPECIFIED AREA - 1180.00 PAINT WARRANTY OF (4) FOUR YEARS NOT (5) FIVE YEARS - 1180.00 WILL NOT OFFER LIFETIME (25 YEAR MINIMUM) MODULE WARRANTY, STATES WILL ONLY OFFER (15) FIFTEEN YEAR WARRANTY - 1180.00 WILL ONLY OFFER (12 MONTH /12,000 MILE) WARRANTY FOR AMBULANCE MANUFACTURE AT THIS RATE WE ESTIMATE WARRANTY TO BE SIX MONTHS FOR EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT CURRENT MILAGE DEMAND ON AMBULANCES ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: MR. KOUNKEL SUPPLIED EDINA WITH TWO (2) SEPARATE BIDS ONE FOR MC COY MILLER AND THE OTHER FOR LIFELINE AMBULANCE. THIS REPRESENTS THE LOW BID AND THE HIGH BID RECEIVED BY EDINA FOR THIS AMBULANCE. MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH MC COY MILLER AMBULANCES AND STATE THAT THEY ARE HEAVY, POORLY CONSTRUCTED AND HAVE A LOT OF "RATTLES ". THE COMMITTEE HAS REVIEWED MR. KOUNKELS BID AND NOTED A TOTAL OF AT LEAST (22) TWENTY -TWO EXCEPTIONS WITH (5) FIVE BEING DEEMED CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS. NO TECHNICAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND IT APPEARS THE BIDDER MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE MODULE LAYOUT WE SPECIFY (DOUBLE BENCH LAYOUT WITH SHALLOW CABINETS AND WINDOWS). AMBULANCE BID ANALYSIS 1995 WHEELED COACH • JOHN PEDERSON BIDDER • BID PRICE $84,996.00 CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0300.00 PDQ DOES NOT COMPLY - 0310.00 MCC DOES NOT COMPLY - 0370.00 ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS DO NOT COMPLY - 0430.00 FLUORESCENT LIGHTING DOES NOT COMPLY - 0620.00 EXTRUDED METAL AND 0.090" THICK METAL - 1170.00 PAYLOAD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH OUR TESTING STANDARDS NON CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0070.00 AIR RIDE ASSIST REAR SUSPENSION - 0140.00 WHEEELED COACH EXCLUSIVE GRILL (HAMPERS AIR FLOW) - 0210.00 CONVEX MIRROR EXCEPTION - 0470.00 WILL NOT COMPLY WITH GRILL SPEAKERS (NOISE CONCERN) - 0630.00 NON SEALING INSULATION (NOISE /WEATHER CONCERN) - 0640.00 USES EXTRUDED DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTER WEIGHT METAL - 0650.00 MATTING NOT TO SPECIFICATION - 0710.00 USES EXTRUDED DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTER WEIGHT METAL CAUSING A SMALLER DOOR OPENINGS - 0750.00 NON SPECIFIED REAR STEPS (MAY CAUSE ICE BUILD UP AND BE BE UNSAFE DURING ICE CONDITIONS - 0790.00 NON SPECIFIED PAINT AND PAINTING PROCESS - 0820.00 USES DIFFERENT FLOOR MATERIAL (METAL HONEYCOMB PLATFORM) - 0850.00 CEILING IS NOT USER FRIENDLY AND MAY HARBOR BBP DUE TO RECESSED GRAB RAILS AND FIXTURES - 0890.00 USES NON SPECIFIED HEADLINER (FIBERGLASS CEILING) - 1010.00 VACUUM ASPIRATOR NOT IN SPECIFIED AREA ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NO TECHNICAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND IT APPEARS THAT THEY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MATCH THE MODULE LAYOUT WE SPECIFY (DOUBLE BENCH). ADDITIONALLY THE BIDDER MAKES MANY REFERENCES TO THE EXCEPTION LIST THAT HE REFERS TO "EXCEEDS SPECIFICATIONS ", IN THE COMMITTEES EYES THESE "EXCEEDS SPECIFICATIONS" ARE NOTHING SHORT OF EXCEPTIONS THAT THE BIDDER CAN NOT OR WILL NOT COMPLY WITH. A TOTAL OF AT LEAST (20) TWENTY EXCEPTIONS WITH (6) BEING CRITICAL CRITERIA CONCERNS WERE NOTED BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS. THE COMMITTE ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT THE BIDDER TWICE IN AN ATTEMPT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS CONCERNING HIS BID, BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. AMBULANCE BID ANALYSIS 1995 ROAD RESCUE • BIDDER CRAIG F. SCHAUFFERT • BID PRICE $85,998.00 CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0050.00 BATTERY SYSTEM ALTERED ADDED AND MOVED BATTERIES - 0300.00 NON COMPLIANCE TO ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS - 0310.00 NON COMPLIANCE TO ELECTRICAL SWITCHES - 0430.00 NON COMPLIANCE TO FLORESCENT LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS - 0620.00 NON COMPLIANCE USES EXTRUDED METAL CONSTRUCTION NON CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0140.00 ALLOWED EXCEPTION (CASSETTE STEREO) - 0190.00 ALLOWED EXCEPTION (STANDARD MICHELIN TIRES) - 0220.00 NON COMPLIANCE EXCEPTION (USES COLOR KEYED METERS) - 0240.00 ALLOWED EXCEPTION (DIFFERENT TIRE VALVE STEMS) - 0320.00 NON COMPLIANCE SWITCHING FOR ACP ( "CONTOUR SWITCHING ") - 0420.00 NON COMPLIANCE LIGHTING (UNACCEPTABLE MICROPRISMATIC) - 0600.00 NON COMPLIANCE TAIL LIGHTS (SMALLER SIZE) - 0630.00 NON SEALING INSULATION (NOISE /WEATHER CONCERN) - 0700.00 UNACCEPTABLE WE NEED THIS ROOM FOR SPARE 02 /NITROUS TANKS - 0710.00 USES EXTRUDED DOOR CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTER WEIGHT METAL CAUSING A SMALLER DOOR OPENING - 0770.00 USES DIFFERENT METHOD OF SECURING MODULE TO CHASSIS - 0870.00 SPECIFICATIONS CALL FOR NON RESTOCKING DOORS - 0890.00 USES DIFFERENT HEADLINER - 0900.00 USES ALL ALUMINUM CABINETS (INCREASED NOISE /RATTLES) - 0910.00 USES ALL ALUMINUM CABINETS (INCREASED NOISE /RATTLES) - 0930.00 USES ALL ALUMINUM CABINETS (INCREASED NOISE /RATTLES) - 1180.00 WILL NOT OFFER SPECIFIED PAINT WARRANTY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: FIRE CHIEF VOICED MANY CONCERNS OVER WARRANTY SERVICE AND "CUSTOMER SATISFACTION" AFTER SALE OF AMBULANCE. STATES WE HAVE HAD SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS WITH AFTER SALES SERVICE FOR OUR ROAD RESCUE AMBULANCES WE CURRENTLY OWN (NAVISTAR 393 AND FORD 392). NOTED (22) TWENTY TWO TOTAL EXCEPTIONS WITH (5) FIVE BEING CRITICAL CRITERIA COMPONENTS. MR. SCHAUFFERT, THE BIDDER, HAS SINCE "RETIRED" FROM ROAD RESCUE AND NEW CONTACT PERSON IS MELISSA. AMBULANCE BID ANALYSIS 1995 1 ;l. • FRED PAWELK BIDDER • BID PRICE $86,700.00 CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: NON CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: IT APPEARS THAT BRAUN COMPLIES WITH ALL SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THIS BID. ONE AREA OF CONCERN IS THE SCHEDULED DELIVERY DATE. BRAUN STATES THEY WOULD LIKE 180 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF A SIGNED ORDER FOR DELIVERY OF THIS AMBULANCE. OUR SPECIFICATIONS CALL FOR "THE DELIVERY SCHEDULES THAT ARE SUBMITTED BY THE BIDDERS AND AGREED UPON BY THE PURCHASER SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BECOME BINDING UPON THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER." EDINA FIRE CURRENTLY OPERATES A BRAUN AMBULANCE AND THE PARAMEDICS ARE SATISFIED WITH THE DESIGN AND WORKMANSHIP OF THIS VEHICLE. WARRANTY WORK HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AND /OR COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. PAYLOAD AND DELIVERY ARE THE ONLY AREAS OF CONCERN TO THIS COMMITTEE. AMBULANCE BID ANALYSIS 1995 LIFELINE AMBULANCES • JOE KOUNKEL BIDDER • BID PRICE $87,828.00 CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0050.00 BATTERIES ARE MOVED TO A SIDE COMPARTMENT AND NOT FORD OEM BATTERIES - 0620.00 USES EXTRUDED METAL MODULE CONSTRUCTION - 1170.00 PAYLOAD WELL EXCEEDS 1600 POUNDS NON CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS: - 0470.00 WILL NOT INSTALL TOMAR LIGHTING PRODUCTS - 0560.00 WILL NOT INSTALL TOMAR LIGHTING PRODUCTS - 0570.00 WILL NOT INSTALL TOMAR LIGHTING PRODUCTS - 0630.00 USES STYROFOAM INSULATION (INCREASED NOISE /AIR) - 0640.00 USES EXTRUDED METAL IN DOORS AND WILL NOT USE TRIO -MARK HANDLES - 0710.00 USES EXTRUDED METAL CAUSING SMALLER DOOR OPENINGS - 0730.00 NO REFLECTIVE MATERIAL AT RUB RAIL AREA (SAFETY CONCERN) - 0920.00 USES PLYWOOD FOR SQUAD BENCH CONSTRUCTION (HEAVIER, POTENTIAL FOR BBP) ALSO WILL NOT MAKE STREET SIDE SQUAD BENCH - 0940.00 SEE EXCEPTION 0920.00 - 1180.00 WILL NOT OFFER WARRANTY FOR SPECIFIED TIME (LESS OF A WARRANTY) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: LIFELINE AMBULANCE OFFERED THE HIGHEST BID OF ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS. ADDITIONALLY, THEY FAIL TO MEET A TOTAL OF AT LEAST (13) THIRTEEN SPECIFICATIONS WITH AT LEAST (3) THREE BEING DEEMED CRITICAL CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS. THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH LIFELINE AMBULANCE CONSTRUCTION AND HAVE NEVER OPERATED OUT OF THESE AMBULANCES. THE BIDDER STATES THEY CAN NOT MEET OUR PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS WHICH IS OF PRIMARY CONCERN FOR EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMBERS AS AN OVERLOADED VEHICLE IS NOT ROAD WORTHY. M TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 19 June, 1995 AGENDA ITEM III.B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Cleaning, Repairing & Painting of Gleason Water Tower Company 1. J & W Sandblasting 2. Abhe & Svoboda 3. Odland Protective Coatings 4. Tenyer Coatings, Inc. 5 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J & W Sandblasting GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 320,000.00 2. $ 323,465.00 3. $ 327,050.00 4. $ 477,283.00 5. $ $ 320,000.00 This is the repair and re- coating of the Gleason Water Tower. The work will consist of interior cleaning and coating as needed on the interior and a total removal of exterior paints /coatings and re- coating the tank and painting. The Gleason Water Tower is a one million gallon tank. This project was listed as part of the repairs on utilities presented last fall during the water rate study review. As such, this project is funded by the Utility Fund. -^ /I re The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Public Works - Utilities Dep ment not within bud t J n Wallin, F' ance Director Kenneth Ro and, City Manaber r TO: Mayor & Council Members REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 19 June, 1995 AGENDA ITEM III.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Property Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Hartford 1. $ 44,223.00 2 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hartford $ 44,223.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Jack Carroll of Rollins Hudig Hall secured this quote from the Hartford (see attached). This premium is less than last year. He attempted to secure other quotes, but only two companies responded. One company at $2,000 over the Hartford quote and the other company indicated that they could not compete. Neither company prepared anything in writing. Mr. Carroll will be at the Council Meeting should you have questions. Av� Administration Sign re Depa nt The Recommended Bid is within budget not within dget n allin, Finance Director Kenneth Ro land, City MaAager Rollins Hudig Hall of Minnesota, Inc. gF i ROLLINS HUDIG HALL 8500 Normandale Lake Boulevard. Saute 1200 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55137 Telephone 612/897 -5800 Far 612/897.5801 June 15, 1995 Ms. Ceil Smith Assistant City Manager CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Property Insurance Renewal Dear Ceil: Enclosed you will find the property renewal proposal for the City of Edina for the policy term July 1, 1995 to July 1, 1996. As usual, we looked at a couple of different companies in addition to the Hartford Insurance Company. Hartford, had the lowest rate /premium. The City of Edina has had an overall loss ratio for the last four years of approximately 37 %. The values for the real property have not been updated within the last several years. Hartford has increased the property values across the board by 3% and reduced the property rate to deliver a lower premium than last year. The statement of values you currently have does not reflect 3% increase. This will be updated upon processing the renewal. Please call me if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this property renewal. Sincerely, �ohn T. Carroll, Jr. Senior Vice President (Direct Telephone #612- 897 -5869) JTC /llf cc: Linda K. Drager - RHH g: \docs \jtcIS.IVUune 15, 1995 AA An T CM Company City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Property Renewal Proposal July 1, 1995 to July 1, 1996 Presented By: John T. Carroll, Jr. Senior Vice President Linda K. Drager Vice President _ Rollins Hudig Hall of Minnesota, Inc. 8500 Normandale Lake Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 (612) 897 -5800 Aijahk ctyedina —June 15, 1995 W ROLL.INS HUDIG HALL • CITY OF EDINA 1995 to 1996 Line of Insurance Coverage Property Buildings Business Personal Property Business Income Stock Reporting Inland Marine Fine Arts Misc. Property - Radio Towers Misc. Property - Voting Machines Crime Premium: Theft Disappearance & Destruction Vernon Avenue York Avenue 50th Street Braemar Arena Braemar Club Limit $47,130,590 $3,388,588 $669,500 $1,010,000 Replacement Cost, 90% Coinsurance $1,000 Deductible $5,000,000 Earthquake w /$25,000 Deductible $500 Deductible Crime - $1,000 Overnight Limit Business Income - 50% Coinsurance Inland Marine - $500 Deductible $44,233 $14,500 $36,000 $246,960 $14,000 $15,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 cryedina —June 15, 1995 W ROLLINS HUDIG HALL CITY OF EDINA 1995 to 1996 Historical Premium Comparison Hartford Hartford Hartford 199311994 199411995 199511996 Building $ 35,060 $ 37,069 $ 36,296 Contents $ 4,248 $ 4,500 $ 4,706 Stock Included Included Included Business Income $ 800 $ 540 $ 536 Inland Marine $ 962 $ 1,138 $ 1,138 Crime $ 2,210 $ 1,547 $ 1,547 $ 43,280 $ 44,774 $ 44,223 Amalk cryedina —June 15, 1995 iW ROLLINS HUDIG HALL I TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Ceil Smith REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 19 June, 1995 AGENDA ITEM III.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Worker's Compensation, Auto Liability, General Liability Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. St. Paul Companies 1. $ 569,009.00 2 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: St. Paul Companies GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 569,009.00 Bill Homeyer of the Harris Homeyer Agency secured this quote from the St. Paul Companies. There is one quote because we are in the third year of a three year period of guaranteed rates for Auto and General, Liability. This premium deposit is $115,372 less than last year. Mr. Homeyer will be present at the City Council meeting should you have questions. Please see attached for details. The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Administration D nt not within bu et ohn Wallin, Fi nce Director Kenneth Rosl nd, City Manager 06/16/95 08:34 0612 922 7547 i1h Ha"% -H0ffW er CORiPW 6161 Wooddale Ave., Suite 101 P.O. Bon 24030 Edina, Minnesota 55424 612 - 922-0301 Fox 612 -922 -7547 June 16, 1995 Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, HN 55424 Re: July 1 Insurance Renewal Dear Ceil, HARRIS HOMEYER N CL William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris. CPCU Douglas H. Crowther David w. Crowther Timothy S. Gonsior Enclosed find the renewal proposal. from the St. Paul Co's. As you know, the program you are on with St. Paul is "loss sensitive". By that I mean the City's final premium is dependent upon the claims the City incurs. Based on the payrolls used, your premium will be between $298,069 and $747,895. As you see the deposit premium is $115,372 less than last year. Also, remember you received a return of $175,873 during the year for policy year 1993. I have also enclosed an exhibit showing the 3 year comparison of the St. Paul Program. As you will recall, St. Paul guaranteed the auto and general liability rates for 3 years. (The only reason the premiums differ from one year to another is an increase in the number of autos and increased receipts due to the extra 9's at Braemar and Normandale). In addition the equipment is being renewed by Fireman's Fund at the same rate per $100 of equipment, with a premium of $9,736 versus $10,053 last year. Thanks, William P. Homeyer WPH /jlb LTR2217 Worker's Compensation Auto General Liability includes Liquor, Pollution and Employee Benefit Total City of Edina 3 Year Comparison St. Paul Coss 1995 1994 380,505 477,650 80,304 78,902 135,200 127,829 569,009 684,381 1995 1994 Minimum 298,069 333,344 Maximum 747,895 855,018 1993 408,700 78,662 121,769 609,131 1993 297,590 767,087 The above are deposit premiums - actual premiums will vary depending upon losses. See the minimums and maximums above. LTR2217 4 1995 -1996 City of Edina Dollar Amount of Losses 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 Final Premium 367,136 431,552 495,969 560,385 624,801 689,217 747,895 (maximum) 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 Actual Incurred Losses 107,399 352,931 195,667 480,200 191,710 167,950 As of 12/31/94 LTR2217 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 19 June, 1995 AGENDA ITEM III.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Boiler & Machinery Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Travelers Insurance Co. 1. $ 7,825.00 2 2. 3. 3• 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Travelers Insurance Co. $ 7,825.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Mr. William Brandow of BHK &R, Inc. received this quote from the Travelers Insurance Company. He secured only one quote because we are in the third year of a three year program. This premium is up less than 4% over last year. re Administration Denadment The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J allin, Kenneth Rosland, City nce Director en, s,iw REPORT /RECOMMENDATION •.v v • br r�R l'OW`�a0 INNN To: PIayor Richards and Council Members From: John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. Date:June 14, 1995 Subject: EDINA SOCCER ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL FOR LEWIS PARK Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV. A. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends I To HRA To Council Action I Motion Resolution Ordinance L! Discussion To accept the Edina Park Board's recommendation to approve the Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop the Lewis Park bandy field into a soccer field as outlined below. Info /Background ESA PROPOSAL On February 13, 1995, the Edina Soccer Association (ESA) Board of Directors passed a proposal for the City of Edina to consider. A copy of this proposal is attached as addendum "A. 11 The ESA proposal requests that the City of Edina not use the bandy rink area for outdoor skating (thus relocating the bandy program) and develop that east field into a playable soccer field. The improvements to the east field would include regrading, "seeding, and irrigation. Improved restroom facilities and additional bleachers are also part of the ESA's proposal. The ESA has offered to donate up to $40,000 to the City of Edina to support these improvements to Lewis Park. It is also ESA's goal to contribute, approximately $10,000 per year to the City of Edina to help finance improvements to Lewis Park and other soccer facilities in Edina. If approved, this proposal would eliminate the large sheet of ice at Lewis Park, however, the general skating area to the north of the warming house and hockey rink to the south would still be maintained during the winter months. The bandy program would have to rely on the John Rose Minnesota Oval bandy rink for their games and practices. -2- STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The Edina Soccer Association has been using Weber Park to schedule their Under 6 soccer program. The field at Weber Park is considered to be unacceptable and unsafe turf for soccer use mainly because it is used as an outdoor skating rink during the winter months. The field is basically weeds and compacted dirt, which is dusty when dry and muddy when wet. This age group in particular needs access to restroom facilities. There are fifteen (15) soccer fields (two of which are owned and maintained by the Edina School District) in Edina that are needed to administer the Edina Soccer Association program: Park Braemar Creek Valley Garden Highlands Lewis Pamela Strachauer Weber Edina High School TOTAL Senior Size Field 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 6 Junior Size Field 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 There are 386 children registered in the ESA Under 6 soccer program, whereas, there are approximately 2,200 youth registered in the total ESA program. The program is expected to grow to approximately 2,300 youth in 1996. The Edina Soccer Association is requesting a reasonable alternative field to replace the Weber Park soccer field. The criteria used to find a reasonable alternative field ideally included adequate restroom facilities, adequate parking and safe and desirable athletic turf. Staff and some Edina Soccer Association board members visited every possible School District owned and City owned alternative site in Edina to develop a soccer field. The field located between the Edina Community Center and South View Middle School, as well as, Kuhlman football /soccer field, (both owned and maintained by the Edina School District) were viewed as reasonable alternatives. The Edina School District staff has denied our requests to gain access to those fields. In addition, the Edina Soccer Association prefers not to have to rely on Edina School District soccer any more than necessary. All other City owned sites that were considered did not meet the pre - determined criteria of adequate restroom facilities, adequate parking, and safe and desirable turf. Therefore, it was decided that the best alternative site that met all of these criteria was Lewis Park. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Edina Soccer Association appeared before the Edina Park Board on April 11, 1995, to present their proposal. Bandy managers and American Bandy Association board members were informed of the April Park Board meeting and several bandy enthusiasts also attended the meeting. On April 17, 1995, staff mailed a letter (addendum "B °) to every resident within approximately 500 feet of Lewis Park (240 letters) to inform them that the ESA proposal was going to be discussed and possibly voted on at the May 9, 1995, Park Board meeting. -3- At the May 9, 1995, Park Board meeting, there were approximately 50 Edina residents in attendance to share their views on the proposal. The residents' main concerns were primarily: 1. Parking The issue of adequate parking was discussed at length. There are a total of 106 parking spaces between the two parking lots. Of the 106 spaces, six of them are handicapped parking only spaces. There are a total of 72 spaces in the east lot and 34 spaces in the southwest lot in Lewis Park. There should be adequate parking spaces for park users for most of the time. In some cases, on street parking may be needed, which is the norm at other soccer field sites, such as, Strachauer Park, Pamela Park, and Weber Park. The residents of Lewis Ridge Condominiums recently informed staff that they are experiencing problems with park users parking unlawfully in the Lewis Ridge private driveway. Lewis Ridge residents were assuming that their private drive is a designated fire lane because there are posted signs that make that claim. According to the Edina Fire Marshall, Mr. Steve Landry, that is not considered to be a fire lane and the signs were actually placed there by the private owner. It has been suggested to the Lewis Ridge residents that they consider consulting their Association's attorney and take steps to legally prohibit and enforce unauthorized parking on their private property. The Edina Soccer Association has agreed to inform all parents who have youth registered in the ESA program that they please not use the Lewis Ridge Condominium private drive for parking. 2 Increased Activity and Noise During the Summer Months If the proposal is approved, there would not be games scheduled on all three fields at the same time. The plan is to only schedule two fields for games on any given evening and, if necessary, allow the third field to be used by one team only for practice. This would result in some increased activity during the summer months. 3 Loss of the Large Sheet of Ice for General Skating The large sheet of ice exists primarily for the purpose of the bandy program. Bandy games are scheduled on that facility seven days each week from the end of December through the third week of February. During times when bandy games or practices are not taking place on the large sheet of ice, the general public has enjoyed the large sheet of ice for general skating. This large sheet of ice has been a very popular and desirable public skating area during the winter months. Next to Centennial Lakes Park, Lewis Park general skating area is the most heavily used general skating facility in Edina. 4. Restroom Facilities There is a concern regarding reasonable access to restroom facilities for young soccer players. The Lewis Park warming house is left open during scheduled games, however, the distance from the west field to the warming house is considered by many to be too great for small children. Therefore, staff has constructed a small cedar fenced area for storage of one portable toilet unit for the summer months. The unit is located on the south end of the park, south of the center soccer field next to the trees that hide it from the site of residents. The facility is easily accessible by soccer and tennis players. In addition, ESA has offered to help make improvements to the existing warming house facility to make restrooms accessible from the outside. N I. 1 11 -4- "It was suggested to consider the possibility of playing soccer and bandy on the same site by planting annual grasses and clover. Mr. Vince Cockriel, Edina Park Foreman, and Mr. John Hopko, Turf Restoration Consultant, attended the May Park Board meeting to address this suggestion. They both stated that it is not feasible to use the bandy field for both soccer and bandy. Soccer fields need to be properly graded and irrigated to maintain a safe and healthy turf. To maintain a bandy rink, the field must be graded flat, which results in improper drainage for a soccer field. In addition, large turf areas that are flooded in the winter for skating purposes result in mainly knotweed because all desirable grasses do not survive. This ultimately leads to a muddy, unsafe and undesirable athletic turf surface. Mr. Hopko explained that newly planted rye grass and clover need approximately 60 days after germination to develop into a safe and playable athletic turf. On May 24, 1995, staff mailed a letter (addendum "C") to all the residents within 500 feet of Lewis Park to inform them that the issue would be on the agenda for the June 19, 1995, Edina City Council meeting. Edina Soccer Association board members were also informed, as well as, Bandy Managers, American Bandy Association board members and Minnesota Bandy Federation board members. MAY 9. 1995, EDINA PARK BOARD MEETING On Tuesday, May 9, 1995, the Edina Park Board voted and passed a recommendation to the Edina City Council to approve the Edina Soccer Association's proposal. The vote was 6 in favor and 5 against. As reflected in the May 9, 1995, Park Board minutes, there was lengthy discussion and debate. Addendum "A" EDINA SOCCER ASSOCIATION- PROPOSAL FOR LEWIS PARK February 13, 1995 One of the long range goals of the Edina Soccer Association is to create a "soccer complex ". With increasing numbers in the soccer program, particularly in the U -6 and U -8 programs, we need additional fields that are in good condition, that have adequate parking, bathroom facilities, and lights. We think that by housing both the U -6 and U -8 programs at the same location, we will make participation in these programs much easier for families with young children. We propose the following improvements to facilitate Lewis Park as a soccer complex: 1. Short term- (1995 season) To use Lewis Park field west for the U -6 program. Existing senior size field would be made into two junior size fields. Existing permanent goal stands will be removed. ESA will help pay for a portable bathroom with wooden surround. 2. Long term - (begin in 1996 season) To regrade, sod, and finish irrigation to make three junior fields at east end of Lewis Park, add bleachers, improve existing bathroom facilities, expand parking lots as necessary. Retain middle field as a senior size field with lighting. Both east and west fields would be junior fields for U -6 and U -8 programs. When not in use for these programs, both fields could be used as senior fields for traveling or in house games and practices. 3. Financial commitment- If City of Edina could guarantee that the bandy program wil be relocated by spring 1996, ESA is willing to contribute up to $30,000. for improvement of Lewis Park. Additional contributions of approximately $10,000. per year will be made for improvements to Lewis Park and other soccer facilities in Edina. f Addendum "A ", page 2 4. Additional information- To keep athletic fields in their best condition, it is recommended that field use be rotated. ESA, along with the cooperation of other athletic associations and the Park and Rec Dept. would help to maintain fields by rotating use and contributing to their maintenance. Since the U -6 and U8 programs run from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, any times both before and after these programs could be used for practices for both in -house and traveling teams. 5. Registered players from 1994 season- House league Traveling U -6 450 U -10 82 U -8 475 U -12 80 U -10 351 U -14 64 U -12 250 U -16 48 U -14/16 242 U -17 17 U -19 30 House league total- 1,768 'Traveling total- 321 rr 1 s� O, April 17, 1995 Addendum "B " City of Edina J SUBJECT: Request for community input regarding Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. Dear Resident: The volunteer advisory board to the Edina City Council, the Edina Park Board, is seeking community input on an important matter concerning your local park. Due to the soccer program's growth, the Edina Soccer Association has recently made a proposal to the Edina Park Board to develop the large bandy /skating rink area, at Lewis Park, into a playable soccer field area. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to donate up to $40,000 (from their association funds) to the City of Edina to pay for development expenses, such as, irrigation, grading, drainage and seeding. If the bandy /skating rink area were to be developed into a playable soccer field, the large area could then no longer be used for skating purposes in the winter. The smaller general skating rink and the hockey rink would still be maintained throughout the winter months, however, the large lighted soccer field would not be flooded for ice skating purposes. The Edina Park Board will be discussing, and possibly voting on, this proposal at their Board meeting on Tuesday, May 9, 1995, 7:30 p.m., Edina Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. Therefore, if you have an opinion that you wish to share with the Edina Park Board, please send your comments in writing and address the envelope to: Edina Park Board Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 As always, you are also welcome to attend the Edina Park Board meeting to share your comments in person. For your information, this notice has been mailed to every Edina resident who resides within approximately 500 feet of Lewis Park. If you have further questions about this matter, feel free to call me at 927 -8861 ext. 230. Many thanks. Si erely, John Kepr rS,Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 Addendum "C" City of Edina May 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. Dear Resident: Please know that the Edina City Council will be addressing the Edina Soccer Association's proposal at the Monday, June 19, 1995, City Council meeting, which begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. On behalf of the Edina Park Board members, I wish to extend a hearty thanks to all those who attended the Edina Park Board meeting on May 9, 1995, to share your views on this important issue. As you may already know, at the May 9, 1995, Park Board meeting, the eleven member Edina Park Board voted 6 to 5 in favor of the Edina Soccer Association's proposal. This recommendation now goes to the Edina City Council on June 19th for final approval or rejection. In spite of the fact that Lewis Park is categorized as a Community Playfield (designed to serve a 16 square mile area), your input is important to those who are charged with the responsibility to make this decision. Therefore, if you have comments that you wish to share with the Edina City Council, I encourage you to please send your comments in writing and address the envelope to: Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 As always, you are also welcome to attend the Edina City Council meeting to share your comments in person. For your information, this notice has been mailed to every Edina resident who resides within approximately 500 feet of Lewis Park. If you have further questions about this matter, feel free to call me at 927 -8861 ext. 230. Many thanks. Sincerely, Jdhn Keprag/, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 Dewey Hill West Harold Teachout, Chairman, Board of Directors 5601 Dewey Hill Road #208 Ph: 612 -944 -3943 Minneapolis, MN 55439 June 8, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina City Council From: Dewey Hill West Subject: Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy/ skating rink into a soccer field After receiving the first letter on the subject, our Board decided to poll all our residents to determine what, if any, action we should take. We have 58 units in our building of which 38 responded by signing the attached sheet. There are two duplications which means 36 units are represented. Everyone, 100 %, is opposed. As suggested in the letter of May 24th, we are calling to your attention the objections of our residents and plan to have a group attend the June 19th Council meeting. Regard , arold Teachout Chairman, Board of Directors, Dewey Hill West 4— —�'. � ... +}. —;,^,j — ley • ` ` —iy... — 7: .. SIGN UP SHEET. , 1 1. . . k� J Additional information that you wish to share; please call the at 942- 7296.). NAME. FOR A AGAINST x, SIGN UP::SHEET additional information that you w� h to shareur Teasel all mae at 9 important. If you.: have any (It is note necessar...to sin your. y . i b r, 42- 7296.) NAME FOR AGAINST J x;, °; . �� G , /995 �� ��� �� �� � � �t �rrn. ��.o�.a� ..� � G�[.e..� Qom, �Yia� � � / — °/T �� . �r �- � � �� � �/��, f jt,� /� 9-6- �.C�ti CG¢iJ a G.lk✓"✓ , Z� 7 _p 4-4, � � - � � � /mac iL 6 /9/'S City of Edina May 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. Dear Resident: Please know that the Edina City Council will be addressing the Edina Soccer Association's proposal at the Monday, June 19, 1995, City Council meeting, which begins at 7:00 p.m- in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. On behalf of the Edina Park Board members, I wish to extend a hearty thanks to all those who attended the Edina Park Board meeting on May 9, 1995, to share your views on this important issue. As you may already know, at the May 9, 1995, Park Board meeting, the eleven member Edina Park Board voted 6 to 5 in favor of the Edina Soccer Association's proposal. This recommendation now goes to the Edina City Council on June 19th for final approval or rejection. In spite of the fact that Lewis Park is categorized as a Community Playfield (designed to serve a 16 square mile area) your input is important to those who are charged with the responsibility to make this decision. Therefore, if you have comments that you wish to share with the Edina City Council, I encourage you to please send your comments in writing and address the envelope to: Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 As always, you are also welcome to attend the Edina City Council meeting to share your comments in person. For your information, this notice has been mailed to every Edina resident who resides within approximately 500 feet of Lewis Park. If you have further questions about this matter, feel free to call me at 927 -8861 ext. 230. Many thanks. Si ely, L J n Kepr s, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department /e City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (6121 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1393 TDD (612) 927 -5461 I � i [I ILLJ �U'a -��� �` .'`` Lu1� ^"a��..� ,oa►xr,� 4-D Loo `it., �1`. �►s s . ,�v, lu,1�'_` C•�.61�v3�.4 •Y.I-Z �L-c.. cywic.. 1 ,td.C.. [1i�� � ;,l.bl.� ,t4'.PLl S J�GSLGa.LL.•i"'1 LuA5 N6 Ac- VLN LuA5 N6 Ac- DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field; contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very y= small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to S. Many people are very upset about losing a year -round, multi-use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! i,tl "/ 14.1 it COoLtj Vor� � 4,11 (J 41 C- A,'�. 6 "T & ti Tv-A S LVL'A 5KL bvv LL PU2 y4v - \.Ot- Vor� � 4,11 DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field,. contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the m s used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very v_„ yr small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year -round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Conned. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring g ftr solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! ILL ,lAA4: - . ILL �lUliL VutC- �� I 6-11 ; v► 111 fl(,JL �/ .t(�Ll -l"�l Ot�cis•� LcYlSli(.". IL C(,J p1'L bi+�,�1 i 4111 ' S 0�4t1� lx Y f 1 6L 14-k Cis ti L u rw` ita • I � h - i �" rULGLI s rf- s c1A... G1.. �lUliL VutC- �� I 6-11 ; v► DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very very small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920 -0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! A k�/ cz a Ys V�L vile C I LCI LO DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very, very small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to S. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or _ write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920 -0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very X= small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City CounciL Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring to her solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! Dear Peggy: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. 1 urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing.(e.g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan eev � / �� f -nA "7-4 r,- � � T v l v' -may � �n rarer �2 - Dear Glenn: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council ,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following : 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 800 of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing. (e. g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan r�cJ Dear Fred: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council ,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April ?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing. (e.g. the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives , which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, I--- / O�k\ F. Thomas Finnegan 7112- 14�-Ile-d, �� o Dear Jane: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park.. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice - skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council ,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing.(e.g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, 7 F. Thomas Finnegan /n ef�✓�,I_1 Dear GI ' I a writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and l live approximately one block from Lewis Park. -My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending _to the#uUZouncil,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major..... part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice . If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing.(e.g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before floodigj the fall, better drainage by, adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building". Do not believe the _9occer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYINC THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we � ... Y should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. -f Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan'- r� LECEGE 7250 Lewis Ridge Parkway • Edina. MN 55435'] Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 To: Mayor Frederick Richards Jane Paulus Peggy Kelly Glenn Smith Dennis Maetzold June 15, 1995 This letter is to inform you of the position of the Lewis Ridge Condominium Association regarding the Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. On May 22, 1995, the Board of Directors of Lewis Ridge passed the following resolution. 'The Board believes that the letter dated April 17, 1995, received by all Lewis Ridge residents concerning the Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy / skating rinks into a soccer field is a concern of all individual residents. The Board further believes that the most effective response to this proposal would be for individual owners to write a letter expressing their views directly to The Edina City Council, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The Council meeting dealing with this proposal is scheduled for June 19, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., therefore your letters should be received by the Council at least one week prior to the June 19 meeting." On June 14, 1995, a special meeting of the Lewis Ridge Condominium Association was held at the request of our residents to discuss the soccer proposal. We were pleased to have as our guests; representatives from the Park Department, the Park Board and the Soccer Association. Their talks and participation in a question and answer period helped us better understand the plans for Lewis Park. After a thorough discussion among our residents, a vote was taken by our Association. We vote on a percentage of ownership basis and 78.9772% of Condominium voting power was voted. The result was as follows: Proposal to develop Lewis Park Bandy /Skating Rink into a soccer field. For............................................... ............................... 3.40% Against......................................... ............................... 75.25% Prefer to express their opinion directly to City Council 21.34% Thank you for giving Lewis Ridge Condominium Association the opportunity to state our position on this important matter. Sincerely yours, Doris F. Clegg President, Lewis Ridge Condominium Association Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate !0e Big Rink at Lewis Praft. Signed �-- Name Address 'w l� r Phone Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the ig ink at Lewis ark. Signed Name L L- 14 o Address 7 Phone Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Tour Families want winter activities available. YThe soccer Field is redundant. Ui/Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 9,Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ I ask Edina City Council to re iect the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name Address 7 e3 OJ Phone Whereas: Ur Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. LU"Our Families want winter activities available. QThe soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ULewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. LI I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name dL, t c Address -70C-5 C VIAL -1 I " r Lie' Phone -1 (4 -1 3 - � - C ,r Whereas: Edina is.known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. J2 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 35 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate V Big RTi k at is Park. Signed ,�/,E Name Address I ' _ — Phone Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. Jdo not wa t increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to r j G ��.•C �' CC-LG� Gch°�o7G� /q' � .�s' �`,� �'% �61�'7�'t� �c Lit 2 Z'`,� - �j.�:Je'- LL��' -C >i �'i07y�yce'� Y lUY CG}ttF' , :z2��� <�s /� ���.2�.�GrX� L n �•�LG'�y / (- CGCa'�.P �C�[ 1Y07- jLVjtG�,� ..�. D� �.; U d /.ice- Z+� /`r�z�-Z`�� —� � �� ..u�ed'� -�y-�� �✓�urc� ��+-�- oz�c- a�o�[u{ ell- i'LS Z�iy _ � rC12GTry �CG/le�� (� GZLJ- �Cd'�Q�L- G, • 'Zl�2t -.% /1 �a- � d�i..92vi� r- fL�� /?_G�j, � �' •�`aZ ��`3 1 ,sec c � � � � (� � �e.`"Z'/ l ZC!/J rC !'C n�` � Qi � .L�i ,�f-�Z C� �,�p /iv,�s,� �-T �d'l-l."G�'t'-C./J.c Dr7'C • ��'� .�7�cr.�i�a�ic � • ��-� �l ����i � !'/✓ �P/h�iie.evi��y IG� JG,a�e,� -.�, - CL'3cGrC�!I,eQscy�' .- ��!!%� �iFj �-c�1%GC.ECL�t��l1 �� •Cc�{.? � `� iC'� C�O`'�jJ,� e e eie6 er / / t ivy — Q eo'hvrrc�G•iu� �= '�-� -� —' /�Pii -t�.� -�.lv �����i'�z�t �n✓- ��1��.��� Q/% ,% 1`vb-,/- �l �f��j � �.c.,..e c�� � �'�� � • Jdl�r : �-c��, -rte �-- eP < <cUcy, i Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Sirs: 7250 Lewis Ridge Pky. #211 Edina, MM. 55439 June 1,1995 re: New Soccer facilities, Lewis Park, Cahill and Dewey Hill Rd. I am aware that the Edina Park Board has recommended to the Edina City Council, by only one vote, that part of the skating rink be replaced by a third soccer field. I have strong reservations about that change. There are a number of tax paying residents in Lewis Ridge Condominiums, Ron Clark's Lewis Ridge Town houses and Le Chataignier Condominiums that have concern about the change. We have had cars park in our driveway for hours blocking fire lanes. We have people coming to our doors asking to use our rest rooms or worse going into the bushes or woods for relief. If there is to be more use of that area in the summer by a third soccer field, we anticipate more intrusion. I dont think people who pay $400,000 for one of Ron Clark's Town houses would like to look out their windows and see a portable toilet near their front yard. In the fall junior football is played here and the football field is "double marked" for a smaller field for younger players. Could not the same be done for soccer and use# tie two fields? The skating rink could then stay as it is. That is quite busy in the winter. If you do decide to pass the recommendation, which I oppose, could you put rest rooms in the warming house already present on the property? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Tgayn� A. Chadbourn Clyde C.Blinn 7250 Lewis Ridge Pky #210 Edina MN 55439 May 31.1995 The Edina City Council Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina,MN 55424 Dear Members of The Council, I oppose the expansion of the Soccer field at Lewis Park as the Park now serves the majority of the community needs with the bandy /skating rinks. I thank the Park Board for the letter to the residents on April 17,1995 and the chance to attend the Park Board meeting.I disagree with their decision. Very truly yours, &e�roee d&� Clyde Blinn, Resident of Lewis Ridge Condo I dh Harms- Homever COI1t -arty 6161 Wooddale Ave.. Suite 101 P.O. Box 24030 Edina. Minnesota 55424 612- 922 -0301 Fax 612 -922 -7547 May 10, 1995 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Lewis Park Proposal Dear Fred, William P. Homeyer, CPCU 'j, John R. Harris, CPCU Douglas H. Crowther David W. Crowther Timothy S. Gonsior As you know, the Park Board, in a close vote, is recommending the acceptance of the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to convert the Bandy rink to a soccer field. I favor this action, Fred, and want to emphasize to you my reasoning: 1. The Bandy rink is unusable, and extremely unsitely, for nine months of the year. Not only would turf beautify the park, it would also make the space usable nine out of twelve months. 2. The resources utilized to maintain the Bandy rink could, and should, be used to reopen two neighborhood ice facilities. This would be seen as an effort by Park & Rec to address the impending hockey rink shortfall that will result from the growth of girls hockey, in addition to improving existing Neighborhood Facilities. 3. There is a perception that Lewis Park will become an ESA "complex ". In reality, Lewis Park will actually become an enhanced Community Facility, providing multiple venues - tennis, soccer, football, hockey, general skating, walking and playground. 4. I view the ESA proposal as a request to form a partnership with the City to enhance and maintain facilities owned by the City and utilized by ESA. I do not see the integrity of this Community Facility being compromised by this effort. Mayor Fred Richards May 10, 1995 Page 2 This issue brought many opinions, pro and con, by our City residents, and it appears unlikely that the Council can please all special interests with their decision. Nonetheless, I believe the vast majority of citizens will benefit from the conversion. Good luck! Best Regards, i David Crowther DWC /jlb cc Bill Jenkins Chairman, Edina Park Board 9 9 s-, ZIP ca-,) [.✓ SCR- /� D"l�e�- Cdr-- � �- w f('�.� � ,gee -•-�- �..�..� �Q� Q.a.�. � �� �- e- ,��c�. . Cam. �-►..� �.�- � �- �- �-�-�� �- �` �� CLUpg Via— OQ � ---f4? 0-7el� ) 01-414, L��, alv, f-k-- � �-sv �.�w; s R;oPyP i��� -� •�3�6 `/3 7 S 3 7 9 Stanley F. Bachman • 7250 Lems Ridge Pkwy #206 • Edina. MN 55439 June 9, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Council Members: Our purpose in writing to you is in response to the proposal to deuelop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. We realize how popular soccer is, and the desire to haue more playing fields, but does it does it need to be at the expense of skaters? There are many people who use the ice and who teach their children to skate and enjoy the Minnesota winters. We feel it would be wrong to eliminate this actiuity at the park. In addition, as residents of Lewis Ridge Condominium, we are also opposed to the change because we are concerned about the traffic, noise and the potential parking problem on Lewis Ridge Parkway, which is a private driue. Sincerely, Stanley D Georgia Bachman 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy. #206 Edina, MN. 55439 tel. 943 -1254 147-1 1;00 - - -_ .. ! _...._ . _ _. ,. �e-� - -����— � - �- fit,...._ -�� ��...._ el ,j DOES F. CLEOO 7250 LEMS RIDGE PARKWAY, = 116 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55430 June 2, 1995 To the City Council of the City of Edina I am writing regarding the upcoming vote on a proposed soccer field at Lewis Park on June 19, 1995. The Lewis Ridge Condominium Association Board of Directors has decided not to take a position on this issue, but has encouraged the residents to write individual letters in answer to the individual letters they received from the Edina Park Board. I believe this issue has been very much misunderstood by the neighbors of Lewis Park. I, for one, believed that there would be no skating rink other than the hockey rink and that the park would lose its diversity with too many soccer fields, if the third soccer field was allowed. I understand from the Parks Department that there will still be a skating rink on the north side of the warming house to provide the park with diverse facilities. As I understand it now, the park would consist of soccer fields for all ages, football for all ages, playground equipment, a hockey rink and a skating rink for winter sport for the children, as well as a walking path and a tennis court for the seniors in the area As a citizen of Edina, I would be proud of such a diverse park. I think it is making the best use of very valuable land. I am assured that Lewis Ridge Condominium Board of Directors will take appropriate action to prohibit parking on our private driveway. It would be much appreciated if the Park Board would help with proper parking by including such information in the packets given to parents and coaches. I would support a child's soccer field at Lewis Park because I am quite aware that they are badly in need of a grassy field in which to play. Tax money was spent to provide exotic new playground equipment in the park while the young soccer players must play elsewhere on a dirt field. The large flooded skating rink is expensive to maintain, and in a warm winter sits as a stagnant body of water much of the time which is unattractive. It is also used by many people who do not live in Edina because it is one of the largest areas around on which to skate. A well kept grassy field would be a welcome addition. c: Mr. John Keprios Director, Edina Park System Sincerely, Doris F. Clegg Whereas: �� dina is known for Winter Sports Excellence Fr Families want winter activities available. he soccer Field is redundant. dina has three other sites which wouldn't call JJor eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility ❑ I do not want increased oise and traffic. ❑ r� 0(/l� I ask Edina City Council to reject the p k board's oposal to eliminate the Bi =Riat i s irk. i Signed- .'Name ? Name I� Address l Phone Whereas: IOur Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence Families want winter activities available. ifd The soccer Field is redundant. 16 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. UI(Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board' proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed G Name Addres Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 10 Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter.Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's;most used winter facility. ased noise and traffic. I ask Edina ouncil a park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name --A!"rO Address '11 Phone J �• r May 7. 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Edina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned residents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large b�kating rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field The park and rink as it exists today is well used, not j hockey players, but by neighborhood families, who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evening% and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, Ma - %,P95. w Cv� E May 7.. 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Edina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned residents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large bandy /skating rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field The park and rink as it exists today is well used not just by hockey players, but by neighborhood families. who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evenings, and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, May 9, 1995. • /. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. May 7.. 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Edina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned residents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large bandy /skating rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field. The park and rink as it exists today is well used not just by hockey players. but by neighborhood families, who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evenings, and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, May 9, 1995. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy. Edina, Mn. 55439 May 5, 1995 Director of Edina Parks & Recreation Dept. Dear Sir: Am writing to you in regards to the letter we received about developing a soccer field at Lewis Park. We do not approve of the development of a soccer field of this magnitude for the following reasons. We have lived at Lewis Ridge for almost five years and enjoy our daily walk for our health as do many older people in all the condos & townhomes from 70th & Cahill to 78th & Cahill. This area is populated with Senior Citizens and taxed heavily. At present we have toddlers in the playground equipment and will have more activity when your new equipment arrives. A few organized games and the ice skating in the winter we do not object too. We have some roller bladers and teen agers on bicycles who could be more careful and need more rules. People at the practice games are using our private driveway, which is a fire lane for parking and watching. Tournaments would bring young people from all areas. The field is only available from two sides. Too much confusion in a Senior area. We would like to see the walking paths improved. They all slope one way or the other. Dangerous to rollerbladers and to walkers. We object to a soccer field and hope you can find a more suitable place which has more parking available, restrooms and police detail. Sincerely, 6avv'� 4� Clarence Gu lld berg X� Gweth Guldberg KARL E. SAMDT, M. D. AL ARTS 17B MEO1 S MINNE I, S TEL PNO "" ArkI 4`17 1,A , "`� / lee � ept Wedphd G• VO4 Ksmnich Dda /Z®G� Edna, MN 55m USA 1 LeCHATAIGNIER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 7200 Cahill Rd, Edina, MN 55439 N L May 3, 1995. John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Your letter of April 17th, 1995 (received April 28th) We,the residents of LeChataignier Condominimums, object to the proposal before the Council to develop Lewis Park bandy/ skating rink to a soccer field. We appreciate the Park and the winter activities of ice skating, bandy /games and use by families with young children during the winter months. Our windows are naturally closed during the winter months when there is no nuisance value, however, the summer months would be a disaster to all resi- dents with the increased traffic and noise levels. We hope the above clearly states oym,. views. Id 3 �v �t d Sincerely Gayle asfo4--d, resident kv�lf V qL '3a� `i 'Z d Z A. C pw r �s A S-7 du� O r' i LE CHATAIGNIER July 1, 1994 Unit # Garage Stall # Name Telephone No. 100 9 & 17 Ken & Majel Miller 941 -6497 101 39 & 40 Ray & Arvis Gustafson 942 -0468 102 23 Evelyn "Gigi" Olsen 829 -0642 Work 831 -1177 103 29 & 30 Glenn & Donna McDonnell 941 -6821 104 28 Les & Lea Nelson 829 -5531 105 21 Jon B. Arnason 944 -1601 106 18 & 20 Al & Amy Woods 944 -8208 107 5 Neil & Jean Lossing 944 -6293 108 1 & 13 Leda Bausman 941 -6498 109 7&8 Don & Mae Rand 944 -0584 110 10 & 44 Glen & Jo Omestad 942 -0327 200 3&4 Eleanor Mass 941 -3019 201 16 Eric & Carol Sundquist 829 -1909 202 24 Bill Yaeger_ 942 -5568 203 22 Stan & Jan Thomas 942 -0297 204 47 Marion Rasmuson 829 -1801 205 19 Ed & Clara Izmirian 941 -3642 206 37 Dick Dahlstrom 941 -6276 207 35 & 36 Audrey Blackbourn 944 -9608 208 41 & 42 Gale & Darlene Basford 944 -7790 209 45 Dan & Florence Liemandt 946 -1469 210 48 Larry & Jinny Payne 941 -4640 300 15 Marian Sorem 944 -0068 301 11 & 12 Doug & Bernice Beach 941 -8528 302 26 Stan & Sharon Chauss 947 -0875 303 31 & 32 Gyda Bailey 941 -4435 304 25 Dick & May Bartley 941 -8270 305 33 Ken & Dorothy Kohn 944 -5308 306 43 Janis Propper 944 -0431 307 38 Melva (Mel) Howard 941 -6318 308 6 Betty (Margaret) Adams 944 -7478 309 34 & 46 Jerry & Joey Gruggen 944 -8200 310 2 & 14 Gilbert & Lois Falk 941 -2240 Pat Sundberg 938 -5549 140 La & 4-V fuh houtc. 1 � S SOc.\sz� Ltvv -� June 12, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council Members, I am writing to you to express my interest in developing the Lewis Park area to facilitate the U -6 Soccer Program. I have recently moved to Edina from Minneapolis, and have been very pleased with my child's participation in this program. I feel that it is important for area parks to become more usable for more members of the community. Developing this park area into soccer fields would accomplish such a goal, and would provide many youngsters an opportunity to participate in a very worthwhile activity. Thank you. Sincerely, Syd Taggart 5017 Windsor Ave. Edina 7250 Lewi4 Paafaury ,#205 fd&za, AJiim"o;ta 55439 a 8, 1995 The Edina Ci;ty CouncU Edina Li;ty #a,U 6di.ns.. A mw4o to 55424 Deal Council d embe u: We aire wAii ng #o expme44 ours view teganding die ok6m o� $40, 000.00 fjorn a p ovate .4outce ;to uppwde a doccem. Ae ld in Lavi -d parch. R 14 oust unde uianding the oget .cnva&ee developing a #1ri rd .doccem. f2.e.ld, u ich avid menlace a .dA%tzng minh nomnv.14 enjoyed 6g young and o. d. Thin appeau #o be a hi.gV# gue4twnaUle plaa u en .docce z 4e.ldo ame Lwady ava ZabApnd c1 ti ea u au d Aemeby be depiti.ved o� a - d/6&ng AiA Theme aite oAert innm i..cx ona. :4ccepiance o� A"e Aunda nz4U open doomw P,% o#fiea veabvw4 ahi.ch uvu ld Aamthe t comrreAciaC p out parch and lw-44 i.et Ltd ude ;to mome omgru.Zpd ac&vi ie4. Ad me"n;t4 o� Ai4 peace aired, rue aite anxious aboat the pvwbab.i ZUy o� iacrtecwed ipec&;b z cr =14; pzo6.lem o� .inewaaed lira Ac and pemorw pamhuug Zm pai,.va#e d%.Lveo; and noZ4e, Zi ttea and Zac o� .dani ;amg AciA- #.iee. -,Ue 4#iivnad y umge counci mem6e)w io me je et Ai4 ,x'40, 000. o�pe u 'fie .loop Pmrce Ad udA .i ,tem .i #v gout conw.idemati on o� #ire mzttem. V #iva[rg go , Dm. and Am. Rwme.0 a a,,,, Z, oa, ,� (�! -) 6941 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 June 12, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Members of the Edina City Council, We are the parents of three soccer players. Our family has been served well by the Edina Soccer Association. The program is in need of more playing facilities. Lewis Park would be a outstanding addition. Please vote to add Lewis Park to the areas used by the Edina Soccer Association. Thank you. Sincerely, y� 4- r /p � Ruth and Bill Gough June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: SOCCER FIELD AT LEWIS PARK Dear Mr. Richards, Please consider a "YES" vote for the Soccer Association. On June 19th you will be discussing the new soccer field at Lewis Park. As a longtime participant in the Edina Soccer Association, I feel the new field will be a great addition. It is a growing sport and it's important that Edina kids continue to have the opportunities in this sport. Thank you, �) , UV Carrie Wikman cw June 14, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council. Recently, I received a letter from the Edina Soccer,,Association asking, for my support of a proposal to'. eliminate the Lewis Park Bandv Rink in favor of another soccer field. in the city: I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL. My family enjoys the Lewis Park Rink all winter long. I do not want to see it replaced by another soccer field. We also enjoy this space in the summer. It is used for kite flying and unorganized sports. It is not in that bad of shape. It can be used in the summer and fall for activities- -even for U -6 soccer. I am concerned that a special interest group is trying to promote their idea with out regard to the communities interests. I look to you, the city council, to thoroughly review this issue and to do what is best for the entire community and the neighborhoods affected by this decision. Sincerl /y, Ann Kramer Parent of U -6 &U -8 Soccer Players JoAnn Kramer 7305 Gleason Road Edina MN 55439` 6916 Cornelia Dr. Edina, MN 55435 June 14, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I am writing to ask your support in approving the upcoming proposal to add an additional soccer field at Lewis Park. Although this action would require a change from the existing use as a bandy rink, an additional soccer field would serve many more residents of Edina. This field would be used to support Edina youth soccer in the spring, summer and fall; not just in the winter as it is currently used. Since Edina has very limited public space to expand to accomodate growing programs such as youth soccer, it is essential that what is available be used most effectively. My daughter has enjoyed playing on Edina traveling soccer teams for the past six years. It is a great program but I am impressed by the soccer facilities that suburban communities such as Eagan, Apple Valley, Eden Prairie, Plymouth, Rosemount, and Minnetonka are able to provide for their children. I appreciate the Council's thoughtful consideration of this matter on June 19, 1995. Sincerely, ?Jon D. Erwin c : Lt f+: s P. ,,4 I%C%eilfir /'I'.l7s 7VII 4104 q,, S s .. Jy /S�t c ►' •%�j /'. tic W d t it rr✓ � <✓ -� - Q- .•�•l. .r •,.rT7'•, �1 �= .� ..ail A.f.- .•,w�.� �'�1... �:. ��...V — �w,:.� �°�, ve'll E� sa .ice A4 s's' Ve.a y c : Lt f+: s P. ,,4 I%C%eilfir /'I'.l7s 7VII 4104 q,, S s .. Jy /S�t c ►' •%�j /'. tic W d t it rr✓ � <✓ -� - Q- .•�•l. .r •,.rT7'•, �1 �= .� ..ail A.f.- .•,w�.� �'�1... �:. ��...V — �w,:.� �°�, Rose Gebo 5733 Drew Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 -2349 June 14, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sirs: I understand that you are in the process of making a decision to add a soccer field at Lewis Park. I am in favor of the new field because sports keep kids off the streets and out of trouble. Because the location is currently being used as a park and is a natural spot to further develop keeping city costs down to a minimum. And because the facilities would be used during reasonable hours not causing disruption to the neighbors. I am a fervent believer that Edina has less trouble with youth - generated crime partly because we keep our kids busy with sports and park activities. Let's not stop now. Sincerely, Rose Gebo June 15, 1995 Bruce Baird 5900 Long Brake Trail Edina, Mn 55439 941 -4916 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn 55424 Dear Mayor Richards, I have received the attached information about closing the Lewis Park "open skating" area. MY FAMILY AGREES THIS SKATING AREA SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED FOR MORE SOCCER! It is nice to have a large skating area, not confined to the size of an official rink. Our neighborhood has already lost 2 tennis courts on Gleason Road, not replaced with anything for the neighborhood. In addition, the Lewis Park tennis courts need resurfacing. Regards, Bruce Baird M1lC�. T` tNAS: SM}OK 4 RE 920-0687 ♦n jj 1 VWA 925 -8765 The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a °soccer complex 66 � x . . �, Lewis Park. This would eli min the largeaheet of ice also known:as the;bandy; +1 - y� at 6 •,7Fa4}V�1t The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this. third field, contingent upon of their proposal in its present form; which .precludes other sport usages. N���3L;f 7, passage The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the:city,of Edina where skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks.,; The present plan Mould. leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very ver small recreational rink.: This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year- -round, multi-use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex". :r Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy?. It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the h d ' 1'. that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been reopening of two neighbor oo nn formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 i Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! June 14,1995 Dear City Council Members, We appreciate the opportunity to include information about the history of our proposal and some other facts about soccer related to our proposal for Lewis Park. We look forward to working with the City of Edina to improve not only soccer fields, but other facilities at our Edina parks. Thank you for your consideration. Edina Soccer Association Board Patti Kelly, President 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 HISTORY OF LEWIS PARK PROPOSAL In 1993 Edina Soccer Association began discussions of moving the U -6 program to another site. The principle reason for this is the constant poor condition of the field at Weber Park. Because the field is flooded for skating in winter, there is no grass only weeds and dirt. In dry conditions the field is very dusty. In rainy and wet conditions, it is often muddy and under water. These conditions make it difficult for the young 5 and 6 year olds to run or control a soccer ball. Over these three years the U -6 program has grown from about 360 to 435 participants. In 1994 we began seriously looking at other options for this program, not only because of field conditions but also because of limited parking facilities at Weber Park. In fall 1994 a committee made up of Patti Kelly and Julie Turnbull met with Ed MacHolda from Park and Rec to set up criteria for a new soccer location for U -6 and possibly the U -8 programs. We decided on the following criteria: adequate bathroom facilities, adequate parking facilities, playground equipment (since many in these programs have other young children) and a park large enough to handle these programs. In fall of 1994 and winter of 1995 Patti Kelly, ESA President and Ed MacHolda, Park and Rec toured all of the parks in Edina to look for suitable sites for adding soccer fields. The best choice was Lewis Park, since it had all the criteria and there was an existing large field not in use (the bandy rink). In February 1995, ESA board voted to approve spending up to $30,000. to make improvements to Lewis Park, with the agreement that Park and Rec would move the bandy program. The original proposal was submitted to John Keprios on February 13, 1995. (see attachment #1) In April 1995, ESA presented its proposal to the Edina Park Board. Some of the concerns of the Park Board were as follows: -Added traffic to the area - Losing a sheet of ice (bandy rink) - Number of participants in our program - Feasibility of grading and putting in new irrigation In answer to these concerns, ESA sent a letter to all Park Board members addressing these concerns. (See attachment #2) In April 1995, City of Edina engineer, Don Johnson completed a parking lot study of Lewis Park. His study shows there are a total of 106 parking spaces at Lewis Park. He and his staff also completed an estimate to regrade, add fill and topsoil to the bandy area. His estimate is $23, 280. In May 1995, Edina Park Board voted 6 -5 to accept Edina Soccer Associations proposal for Lewis Park. Important considerations for Lewis Park proposal -The U -6 soccer program runs Monday through Thursday evenings 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. May 22 through July 21. The rest of the summer the one additional field at Lewis could be used for practices for traveling soccer teams. The existing two soccer fields at Lewis Park are currently used by the traveling program for games and practices, mainly in the evening. In fall, the fields at Lewis Park could be used for recreational football. - Edina Soccer Association has committed $30,000. plus an additional approximately $10,000. to make improvements to city soccer fields in Edina. ESA programs depend on both city and school district fields. In 1994, we requested to use the field between Southview School and Edina Community Center for the U -8 program and were turned down by the school district. Instead the U -8 program was located on one of the upper fields at Edina High School and is currently located there. Officials at the high school were reluctant to let ESA use these fields. - Currently there are two full time city employees required to flood the bandy rink (due to its large size). Every other skating facility in Edina requires two employees to flood three sites on a rotational basis. Due to recent budget cuts, the skating facilities at both Todd and Strachauer Parks were dropped. If put on the same rotation as the other 9 skating sites, Strachauer and Todd parks could be reopened. -Both the hockey and general skating rinks will remain at Lewis Park. Larger general skating areas located at Creek Valley School and Centennial Lakes are very convenient to the Lewis Park neighborhood. -The maximum number of cars counted this season at Weber Park for the U -6 program has been 65. The parking lot on the east end of Lewis Park holds 72 cars, which is more than adequate. FAEGRE & BENSON PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 2200 NORWEST CENTER, 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-3901 TELEPHONE 612- 336 -3000 FACSIMILE 612 - 336.3026 June 15, 1995 BY TELECOPY and U.S. MAIL Edina City Council c/o The Honorable Frederick Richards Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mayor Richards and Council Members: KENNETH A. LIEBMAN 612/336 -3499 liebman @aol.com I am writing to you with respect to the proposal to convert the "Big Rink" at Lewis Park into a soccer field. My family lives in Edina-on Stonewood Court, approximately one mile from Lewis Park. We have one child in the U -6 soccer program, who plays his games at Weber Field. We also have two younger children who will also participate in this excellent program. During the winter, we frequently use the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Because of its size, we find it the best available location, indoor or out, for free skating. The Big Rink is an exceptional facility and a unique local asset. I strongly oppose converting the Big Rink into an additional soccer field. Finally, has feasibility and cost of the Big Rink to be used and summer? KAL:jsn MLL28C66.WP5 the Park Board or the ESA studied the providing the drainage which would permit as a soccer field during the late spring very truly yours, Kenneth A. Liebman Minneapolis Denver Des Moines Washington, D.C. London Frankfurt Moscow Almaty June 14, 1995 Dear Council Members: Wouldn't it be too bad to reduce multi -use park land to single use, single season usage? It seems to me that Lewis Park currently serves multiple constituencies - neighborhood, skaters, hockey players, bandy players, community, soccer players, walkers, etc. The proposal eliminates many of these and doesn't add value. Why does this make sense? On what basis can we justify such a dedication? Please don't limit the options on park land that has proven multi- season use. Respectfully, AA7 7b The Youngbloods Z205 Lanham Lane rEdina I � j6 Y7 (i AAA-) Al A-A-� KARL F. DIESSNER Attorney -at -Law Yorktown Office Court, Suite 159 7101 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Tel. (612) 921 -4944 June 16, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Edina Soccer Association's Proposal Dear Mayor and Council Members: FAX (612) 921 -3299 Please be advised that I reside in the Dewey Hill Condominium located at 5601 Dewey Hill Road and hence received the form letter of John Keprios dated May 24, 1995 relative to the proposal to develop Lewis Park Bandy /Skating Rink into a soccer field. I was shocked when I read the letter of the President of our Association addressed to you advising of the large majority of the Condominium owners who were opposed to such a development. This is particularly true that in view of the fact that in all probability, not more than 25% of the Condominium owners can see the Park and any anticipated noise would be negligible. In any event, I cannot think of any greater usage of rarely used property than providing recreational facilities for our youth. Therefore, even though I have no children nor grandchildren who would be using the facilities after the development, I strongly endorse the Edina Soccer Association proposal. Respectfully submitted, Karl F. Diessner KFD : mlf (untitled) JUNE 16, 1995 TO EDINA CITY COUNCIL; WE WOULD LIKE TO EXL'RESS OUR L)iSAL'L'KUVAL OL' THE L'Lf1N TO ELIMINATE THE BANDY ICE RINK AT LOUIS PARK. MARY JANE & IRV LEVINE 7000 ANTRIM ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 Page 1 Where as: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. QV The soccer Field is redundant. C9� Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Uff Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 0' I do not want increased noise and traffic. El I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Riqk at Lewis P k. Signed Name C L Address % o? Do CA t/i L L R 12 . At-go Phone Where as: ZEdina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 0 Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. �I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at ewis Palk. Signed /� � . /��. Name_ / t= N f-s# C Address Xt o o c&,,, ,I t. 4. R n 3 a Phone 9'f — ; 3 o & Where as: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. �I Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Le' Park. Signed w aeti Name It Address '1 a o oC,,A 4 1 L L_ R M o a Phone 3 D 1 9 Where as: 1 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. I� Our Families want winter activities available. �El The soccer Field is redundant. C Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. �] Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big t Lewis Barb!/ ., Magma Jane Adams 7200 CaW ltocd #308 MN 5Sq(3g Whereas: ❑ El LI LI LI I ask Edina Cit y eliminate the B_i y01 I�haO� A U/ DI Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. \. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. (; ` Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility% I do not want increased noise and t affic. •l; r, ,t Council to reject the p I oard's proposal to i Rink at Lewis Pam Ile Where as: 311�, Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 10 Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. )dD Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility.,, Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. }� I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rin� at Lewis PZ,�� Signed i " Name s a 1 Address v 6 Phone Where as: E6 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. I Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call iffor eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Coyncil to reject th park board's proposal to eliminate the Big 9" at Lp- wisc$2 N Where as: CV Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. . � Our Families want winter activities available. 0 The soccer Field is redundant. R`�Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call �r eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Pewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City C755ficitTo reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big at Lewis ark Signed Name Address 2 0 o J Phone Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council talrelect the park board s proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. t d all Sx {1s.11s -F�,.. Whereas: ;. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence I§ Our Families want winter activities available. 0 The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facihty� 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. 1 ask Edina City Coun i to r ject t e p r floar 's proposal to eliminate Big Rink is Park. Signed Name — Address Phone 9:;,,2A EA - -- - -- -- - -- - Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ ur Families want winter activities available. �r.,Y�The soccer Field is redundant. �7 Edina has three other sites which wouldn'± call for elimjnating a Winter Sports Facility. P,ewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do t not wa t increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council o rejec a park board's propo'sa� o elimin W Ike Big Rin kt is Park. Sign Name t-- A S S V Whereas: zk7 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. i �he soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call f r eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic. Ll I ask Edina City Council to reject the park elimina a Big R' k at wis Signe t.e Ldp Name - t! Sf ce- Address CPIs lc d /�� Phone Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. . Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility I do not want increased noise and traffic. ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate t Big Rink at, wis Park. Signed., Name 7 < ©U e�,�_.G /' Q' Address Phone 9°�//- 4 � Whereas: P Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence 151 Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed ems. A &-c,✓ Name,�.,��. Address 7 Phone /�'f -,6 'f 9 % Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellenc Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't cal' for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facilit, I do not want increased noise and traffic. W - ms � I ask Edina ity ouncil to reject the park oard's proposal to eliminate t e Big Rink Lewis rark. , Signed 4 ) Name Address Phone IYIA Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. V, Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call 1 for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. Cake•'; a Ffuf-j -}•�y.� rO� -c. C '� ry r-,o i LG I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name -A tA;;e C o .►• Q Address S701; ew�r Phone i; X1 �3 $ q 0 Whereas: �. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. 1 The soccer Field is redundant. .1 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. a Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name - - -- - Address Phone I' Edina is known for Winter S Whereas: purts Excellence- known Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. dins has three other sites which wouldn't call fur urinating a Winter Sports Facility. �' is Park is Edina's most used winter facility. �do� want increased noise and traffic. ❑ to reject the park board's proposal to I ask Edina City Council eliminate the Big Rink at wi ark Signe Name 4 Address Phone Z Whereas: Edina is known for Wit ter Sports Excellence. a-Our Families want winter activities available. I "The soccer Field is redundant. (9-Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. i'Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. f I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed `en- Name Address ��' ^ �, CA.• �.� i- �D ._- Phone Whereas: ❑ Edir.a is known for Winter Sports Excellence. WOur Families want winter activities available. U"T'he soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used vl facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate t e Big Rink �l, -twis Par . Signed '�'t'' Name Address - Phone —'- Y-1- / 3 E' 3 m Whereas: [A Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Whereas: U Our Families want winter activities available. Q .l The soccer Field is redundant. Q 16 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call 0 for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate e-�ig Rink at Lewis Egk. Signe '=r a✓ -E" Name -- .k!J Z Whereas: jai Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. Or The soccer Field is redundant. 5d Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. 0 I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Lew' Signed L�� -•'° Name Address e o ° Phone ,J, // — G Z 76 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 0 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. El I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Pa • . SignedC201,I Name Address 00 Phone 9441— 2 Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. 1 f� Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. J2( I do not want increased noise and traffic. LI I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Ri t Pa L� Signed Name Address %ZOD CAw, L L Rof Phone 2 9 7 Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Umne 1, —c boda' Coon cif , to voice- your opinion. MAYOR mr- or RICHARDS PEGGY _KELLY -- -; DENNIS__ nETZOL,D JANE. muLus - GLENN SMITH w s vi , //� .. . of '�.s S'• �., ,��.� � fY ,:•� 'Z sW BY: 6-is-55 : 1:17PM OA 1 N BOSWORTH• 927 76434 2/ 3 EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION June 16, 1995 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposal to Convert Lewis Park Dear Mayor Richards, Growing up in the 60's was Qe driving on a four lane highway. We grew up without fear of violence. Drugs and alcohol were adult problems and most people left their can and homes unlocked. Today's kids walk through a comparative minefield of serious risks on the way to adulthood. Many don't make it---- crimes committed by young people are at record levels. As concerned and compassionate citizens we can and should react proactively to this problem. If there is any truth to the maxim idle handc are tools of the devil, then we should be doing everything within our means to encourage wholesome recreational activities for our young people. The cost of providing these opportunities, in this case improving the utilization of an existing community park, is small compared to the cost of reacting to crimes after the fact. Lewis Park was in place long before the present neighborhood was developed_ The original plan for Lewis Park called for expanding the number of soccer /football fields. Today more than ever we need the increased utilization of this facility that our city forefathers had wisely foreseen. On behalf of the Edina Football Association, representing nearly 500 youth football players frum grades two through eight and their parents, I strongly urge you to approve the proposed conversion of the Lewis Park bandy rink to a soccer/multi-purpose field. Such a facility would provide much needed play Cmr of EDINA 4801 WkST SM STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 SENT BY: 6-13 -55 : 1 :17PN : DA 1 N BOSWORTH- 927 7645:* 3/ 3 area for our program and more than 2,040 young Edina soccer players. To spare a handful of neighbors a relatively trivial inconvenience at the expense of much needed youth recreation programs is simply not acting in the best interest of the community of Edina. Respectfully, y Diley President, Edina Football Association cc Bill Jenkins Chairman, Edina Park Board ' cmr or EDINA 401 %M1 50tH SUCEM EDINA, MINNE.S01A ri$41' 'If It A. oy e y J• `��RPORwTF'O IB09 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # 1Y.B. FROM: Craig G. Swanson Consent Q Traffic Safety Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 15 June, 1995 0 TO Council SUBJECT: Traffic Safety Staff Review Action ❑x Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend adoption of the report. Info /Background: Section A outlines approved requests and recommended actions. J TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW JUNE 13. 1995 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 13, 1995. Staff present included the Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer, the Chief of Police, the Traffic Safety Coordinator, and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 19, 1995, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. (1) Request to reestablish a "No Parking Bus Stop" zone at eastbound W. 54th Street at France Avenue South. The requestor contends that a "Bus Stop" existed at the location prior to construction activity at Tires Plus (5400 France Avenue). Records within the City do not reveal the establishment of such a zone but it may have occurred prior to the current record system. Parking does occur near the intersection and bus riders are forced to board the bus by walking between parked cars. The staff recommends the establishment of a bus stop at the above location and appropriate "No Parking" signs be erected. (2) Request for a limited time parking zone in the area of the commercial property at 3907 W. 54th Street. The requestor states that all day long term parking occurs on both sides of W. 54th Street in conjunction with the auto service businesses located on France Avenue South. This parking prohibits her customers from parking near her store and occasionally infringes on her driveway and the driveway for the residence to her west. Staff observations confirm the full utilization of on street parking in the area. The staff recommends the establishment of two spaces of one -hour timed parking adjacent to 3907 W. 54th Street. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 13, 1995 Page 2 (3) Request to change the crosswalk on W. 44th Street at Brookside Avenue to the north line of the intersection. Also request to improve sidewalks in the area. The requestor cited visibility problems including shrubs, a railroad bridge, and parked busses as reason to move the crosswalk. Additionally, neither the northeast nor southeast curbs and walkways meet ADA compliance standards. A current east -west sidewalk is in place on the north side of W. 44th Street however, it ends prior to reaching Brookside Avenue. The requestor suggests completing this sidewalk to Brookside Avenue and moving the crosswalk to the north line of the intersection. This would be a preferred crossing for children and other pedestrians. The staff discussed the request. Four accidents have occurred during the last three years. All were typical intersection accidents caused by yielding violations. No pedestrians were involved. Short term observations were made of bicyclists, joggers, walkers, and etc. None used the current crosswalk. An ADA compliance upgrade is planned for the intersection and connecting the north side of W. 44th Street sidewalk to an improved curb and crosswalk provides the greatest neighborhood accessibility. The staff recommends the requested changes. (4) Request for "Entering Edina - Speed 30 MPH" on W. 76th Street near the border with the City of Richfield. The requestor states that more prominent display of speed zone signs accompanied by identifying the City would slow traffic along W. 76th Street. The City has not used that type of signage in the past. The staff recommends the installation of an 'oversized" 30 MPH sign on W. 76th Street near the Richfield border. (5) Stop sign installations - Interlachen at Green Farms & Schaefer, and Park Terrace at Malibu Drive - Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition (from Council minutes of December 5, 1994. During the development plans of Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition which extend Interlachen Boulevard, a consultant, Dennis Eyler of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. recommended the above traffic controls. This action would create travel time TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 13, 1995 Page 3 delays and discourage traffic flow along Interlachen Boulevard. The staff concurs and recommends the installation of the "Stop" signs. (6) Request for speed abatement on Wateman Avenue near Interlachen Country Club. This request has been reviewed many times previously. Speed surveys do not reveal significant violations but rapid westbound acceleration provides the perception of speed. The traffic complained about is generated by Interlachen Country Club. No accident history exists along the roadway and signage is adequate. The rapid acceleration is identified as members, service workers, and service vehicles related to the country club. The staff concluded that the only possible solution might be voluntary reductions in speed by country club traffic. It is recommended a letter be sent to the Country Club by the manager requesting educational measures be taken to solve the neighborhood problem. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. (1) Request for speed control and "Stop" sign on Ewing Avenue at W. 61st Street (continued from April discussion). The request was reviewed extensively in 1994. The request was made again due to perceived speeding in the area. A review of current conditions found no changes in the traffic patterns. An extensive traffic count survey was conducted in the adjoining neighborhood and Ewing Avenue was found to carry less than 600 vehicles daily. No additional information was developed to warrant "Stop" signs. (2) Request for warning signs in the 6000 block of York Avenue (continued from April discussion). The request is predicated on the existence of a home -based daycare. An extensive traffic count was conducted on streets south of W. 60th between France Avenue South and Xerxes Avenue South. York Avenue was found to TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 13, 1995 Page 4 have fewer than 250 trips daily and no unusual or compelling circumstances exist to warrant signs. The requestor will be contacted and urged to educate her customers on safety practices when picking up and /or discharging children for the daycare. The staff discussed the request and was unable to identify neighborhood conditions that would warrant the installation of warning signs. (3) Request for "No Parking Anytime" signs on the bridge in the 5000 block of Wooddale Avenue (continued from April discussion). The request was continued from the April, 1995 meeting in order for the Police Department to make Sunday morning observations. Traffic is able to traverse Wooddale Avenue is 36 feet wide overall and narrows to a traveled portion of 32 feet at the bridge. West side Wooddale Avenue parking is prohibited. On a normal 32 foot state aid roadway (the bridge area) parking would be permitted on one side. In lieu of these facts, the parking restriction is not recommended. (4) Request for "Stop" signs on W. 55th Street at Oaklawn Avenue. The request was made due to a May, 1995 injury accident at the intersection. The requestor states that certain neighborhood generated traffic travels too fast along W. 55th Street. No other accidents were reported during a three year search period. W. 55th Street is a typical low- volume residential street with neighborhood traffic. Warrants to support the installation of a "Stop" sign were not found. The staff recommends that an educational letter be sent to neighborhood residents drawing their attention to safe driving in the neighborhood. (5) Request for "Children at Play" signs in the 300 block of Van Buren Avenue. The request was made due to a number of neighborhood children living in the area and the proximity to Alden Park. Van Buren is a very low volume residential street. It is not bordering the park. No accidents or other problems were noted in the area. The park is signed appropriately. Given no unusual circumstances the staff does not recommend additional signage. (6) Request for "Stop" sign on W. 64th Street at Holborn Avenue. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 13, 1995 Page 5 The request is based on perceived speeding and safety concerns as traffic negotiates the W. 64th Street, Holborn Avenue and Whiting Avenue intersection. The area is a very low volume traffic area with virtually all neighborhood generated traffic. No accidents or other apparent warrants exist for a "Stop" sign justification. The staff recommends a letter be distributed to the neighborhood effort to solve the problem. (7) Request for child warning signs in the area of 5700 Code Avenue. The request is based on the recent addition of two children to a Code Avenue residence. The area was reviewed in 1994 for a similar request and signage was upgraded near a local park. Conditions have not changed markedly since 1994 and no new hazards or supporting facts for additional signage could not be found. The staff does not recommend the addition of child warning signs in the neighborhood. (8) Request for child warning signs on Edenmoor Street. Edenmoor Street has very low volume traffic generated in a neighborhood that has only one outlet. Less than 10 homes are located on Edenmoor Street. Virtually all the traffic is neighborhood- based. No facts could be identified justifying warning signs. The staff recommends a letter be prepared and distributed to the greater neighborhood identifying the concerns of traffic safety as it relates to children and suggesting safe driving practices. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Request for speed abatement on Chapel Drive. Requests to reduce speed on Chapel Drive have been reviewed frequently. Perceived speeding and careless driving is related to school traffic especially at discharge times. Stop signs, speed bumps and other measures are not warranted. The staff discussed traffic diversion during discharge times as a longer term solution. This may entail temporary barricades for short periods of time as school lets out. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 13, 1995 Page 6 The staff recommends continuing this request until the fall of 1995. In the interim, research and neighborhood input can be sought on the diversion solution. Also, it is recommended that the Police Department continue efforts with enforcement actions. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # INT. D. FROM: Gordon Hughes © Consent Acting City Clerk Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: June 19, 1995 ❑ To Council SUBJECT: 3.2 Beer License Action X❑ Motion Issuance ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council approval of 3.2 beer license for Q Cumbers Restaurant. Info /Background: Pursuant to City Code 900, beer licenses require approval by the Council before they can be issued. The application of Michael and Sheila McCabe, new owners of the Q Cumbers Restaurant at 7465 France Avenue, has been approved by the Police and Health Departments and is submitted for Council consideration. Off -Sale 3.2 Beer License Q Cumbers Restaurant REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES DATE: JUNE 19, 1995 SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT InfoBackground: Agenda Item # IV.E. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ElDiscussion Governor Carlson recently signed into law Minnesota Laws 1995, Chapter 255, (the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act). This act has been viewed as a more moderate approach to the so called Orfield Legislation which was also passed by the Legislature but was vetoed by Governor Carlson. The attached summary outlines the basic elements of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. It is important to note that participation in the Act is voluntary, although if the City doesn't participate certain pollution cleanup funds administered by the State are not available. If the City wishes to participate, it must indicate this willingness by November 15, 1995. In January, 1996, the Metropolitan Council will negotiate "affordable lifecycle housing goals" with the City. By July, 1996, the City must develop an action plan. LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVE ACCOUNT The "local housing incentive account" will be of most interest to the City. If the City chooses to participate, the local housing incentive account will be levied for the first time in 1997. The amount of this levy is based upon the homesteaded value of the City which exceeds twice the average home value. The exact amount of this levy is not available at this time, however, we believe the 1997 levy will approximate $80,000.00. It should be noted that this amount will be levied against all property in the City, not just homesteaded REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT June 19, 1995 Page two property. If the City chooses to participate, it is eligible to receive incentive grants from the Metropolitan Council for the purpose of providing lifecycle housing opportunities. Presumably, these grants can be combined with the local incentive account as well as other programs to provide affordable housing. The Act also provides that if most of the local housing incentive account is not spent on a year -by -year basis, it is distributed to other jurisdictions for the purpose of providing affordable and lifecycle housing opportunities. I trust that this memo is responsive to your request. I recommend that the Council place this matter on a future agenda to discuss whether the City should participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. .. 7 I Met Council I Metr000litan Livable Communities Fund. I Tax Base Revitalization A Revenue Source • Right of Way Acquisition Fund • Mega Mall fiscal disparities surcharge Purpose: Livable Communities Demonstration Account Revenue Source • Sale of, • Mosquito Control District Levy (50% of the levy) Purpose: Local Housing Incentive Account Revenue Source • Local tax levy based on portion of homestead base • Council bond proceeds • Expand affordable housing in municipality • Municipality negotiates with Council for housing goals Participation in the act is voluntary. If a city does not participate, however, it is not eligible for funds from any of the accounts or the pollution cleanup fund administered by the Department of Trade and Economic Development. If a city participates in the act the following actions will occur. City and Met Council to: 1) Negotiate affordable and life cycle housing goals. Oanuary 15, 1996) 2) City to develop an action plan. auly 1, 1996) • Polluted land Develop incentives clean -up for C -T to implement the Redevelopment Council's policies and the purpose of • Eligible Applicants the act • County • City Participating cities participating in incentive account Local Housing Incentive Account Revenue Source • Local tax levy based on portion of homestead base • Council bond proceeds • Expand affordable housing in municipality • Municipality negotiates with Council for housing goals Participation in the act is voluntary. If a city does not participate, however, it is not eligible for funds from any of the accounts or the pollution cleanup fund administered by the Department of Trade and Economic Development. If a city participates in the act the following actions will occur. City and Met Council to: 1) Negotiate affordable and life cycle housing goals. Oanuary 15, 1996) 2) City to develop an action plan. auly 1, 1996) �1 3) County to calculate municipality market value base amount and funds available for the local housing incentives account Quly 1 of each year) 4) Met Council notify city of its affordable and life- cycle.housing opportunities amount The amount is the lesser of the following lines. 4% of the residential homestead value X local tax rate or 1995 residential homestead value in excess of the market value base amount (2 times average) X local tax rate. 5) City to use local funds and available Metro Council funds to meet its goals. 6) if by 1998 a city has not met its goal and not spent 85% of its affordable and life cycle housing opportunities amount in the previous year, it may; - distribute the funds to the Council to put in the local initiatives account or - distribute the funds to the city of county HRA to create housing opportunities in the city. The Council funds must be matched dollar for dollar by a city. In distributing its funds, the Council must give priority to cities that; - receive less from fiscal disparities than it contributes by more than $200 per household, - demonstrate that the project will link jobs to housing, and - provide matching funds from sources other than the affordable and life -cycle housing opportunities amount The legislation requires annual reports and a report card that records the progress of each city in meeting its goals. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $94.80 3M CO SIGNS & POSTS TP04510 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 1421 06/19/95 $142.20 3M CO LETTERS /NUMBERS TP04511 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 1421 156168 $237.00* 06/19/95 $183.37 A -1 PRINTERS INC LOGO SHIRTS 32455 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 156169 .$183.37* 06/19/95 $41.57 A.M. LEONARD GENERAL SUPPLIES 11388530 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1641 156170 $41.57* 06/19/95 $875.11 AAA LICENSES & PERMITS 060895 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 06/19/95 $9.00 AAA LICENSES & PERMITS 060195 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 156171 $884.11* 06/19/95 $118.11 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $482.33 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $237.40 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $62.10 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $111.62 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $244.94 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $98.62 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S .RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $241.79 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $167.11 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $67.87 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 PATHS & HARD S RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $241.80 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $55.50 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 GUN RANGE RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $78.28 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $50.02 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $657.19 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $137.18 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $196.52 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $241.80 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL S RUBBISH REMOVAL 060195 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 156173 $3,490.18* 06/19/95 $12.60 ACTION MESSENGER SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 00163661 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI 156174 $12.60* 06/19/95 $701.25 AL'S LANDSCAPING & NUR GENERAL SUPPLIES 060195 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 9694 156175 $701.25* 06/19/95 $136.00 ALBINSON BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTI 414036 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 1758 156176 $136.00* 06/19/95 $16.45 ALL ABOUT BEER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1371642 LIQUOR 50TH ST DUES & SUBSCRI 156177 $16.45* 06/19/95 $562.89 ALL FIRE TEST INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5848 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 1784 06/19/95 $107.40 ALL FIRE TEST INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5852 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 1785 156178 $670.29* r I Page 2 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM ----- OBJECT PO NUM. 06/19/95 --------------------------------- $90.00 ALOE UP SUNCARE PRODUC COST OF GOODS - PRO 5784 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST F COST OF GDS -PR 2022 2035 06/19/95 $106.25 ALOE UP SUNCARE PRODUC COST OF GOODS - PRO 5797 PRO SHOP 156179 $196.25* 06/19/95 $338.67 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 26061 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 1818 156180 $338.67* 06/19/95 $160.43 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 24333 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1771 156181 $160.43* 06/19/95 $59.00 AMERICAN DEMOGRAPHICS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 052395 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI 156182 $59.00* 06/19/95 $103.27 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDR)f 053195 053195 GRILL CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 06/19/95 06/19/95 $216.67 $60.08 AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 053195 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $71.98 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 053195 053195 YORK OCCUPANCY LABORATORY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 06/19/95 06/19/95 $12.47 $343.10 AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 053195 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $50.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 053195 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 156183 $857.67* 06/19/95 $408.00 AMERICAN PHOTO COPY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 028370 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI 156184 $408.00* 06/19/95 $774.67 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS I REPAIR PARTS 12100 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 9552 156185 $774.67* 06/19/95 $40.00 ANDERSON, LIZ REFUND SWIMMING 053195 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156186 $40.00* 06/19/95 $132.45 ANDERSON, TODD GENERAL SUPPLIES 060795 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 156187 $132.45* 06/19/95 $30.00 ANDRES, LAVONNE REFUND TENNIS 060295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156188 $30.00* 06/19/95 $58.65 ANDY'S PORTABLES RUBBISH REMOVAL 3399 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 1999 156189 $58.65* 06/19/95 $90.00 ANFINSON, GINA CLEANING 19 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 1893 156190 $90.00* 06/19/95 $90.00 APWA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 105742 SUPERV. & OVRH DUES & SUBSCRI 1919 156191 $90.00* 06/19/95 $93.51 AQUA ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 13080 SNOW & ICE REM ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 1509 1551 06/19/95 $96.28 AQUA ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 13209 SNOW & 156192 $189.79* I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $64.48 ARROYO TIRE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 63813 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 9406 06/19/95 $151.53 ARROYO TIRE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 63598 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 1995 156193 $216.01* 06/19/95 $86.00 ASHWORTH INC COST OF GOODS - PRO 55962 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9030 156194 $86.00* 06/19/95 $125.00 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD F 70184 POOL TRACK GRE CST OF GD FOOD 156195 $125.00* 06/19/95 $75.00 ASSOCIATION OF METROPO MEETING EXPENSE 053195 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS 156196 $75.00* 06/19/95 $10.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 FINANCE EQUIP RENTAL 06/19/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $30.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $190.80 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 06/19/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES BEEPER DISPLAY 4621969 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR REPAIRS 156197 $250.80* 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.61 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.00 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $16.85 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $7.03 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $10.34 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 CENTENNIAL LAK TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 051895 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 156199 $103.13* 06/19/95 $21.48 156200 $21.48* 06/19/95 06/19/95 06/19/95 156201 06/19/95 156202 $100.35 $498.77 $250.25 $849.37* $100.00 $100.00* AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CA BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLE BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLE BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLE BARNHART, NORM COST OF GOODS SOLD F 22679 NORMANDALE GC CST OF CD FOOD 8195 GENERAL SUPPLIES 76288001 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 1194 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 78940 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 1380 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 79317 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 1812 SERVICES CL /EB 062495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER t COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 4 CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. CHECK NO DATE ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $890.00 BARRY SIEWERT CREATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 6000 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 156203 $890.00* 06/19/95 $50.00 BAYER, JEAN REFUND TENNIS LESSON 060895 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156204 $50.00* 06/19/95 $50,000.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT MET BOARD SYSTEM 020384 ICE ARENA PROG BUILDINGS 8002 156205 $50,000.00* 06/19/95 $85.00 BELL, BRUCE MENIER SERVICES CL /EB 070195 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156206 $85.00* 06/19/95 $91.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M M 215571 215978 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $106.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 215976 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 06/19/95 $4.58 $39.05 BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD W 215062 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $71.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD B COST OF GOODS SOLD M 74838 215974 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $142.46 BELLBOY CORPORATION CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 215921 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $133.30 $172.25 BELLBOY BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD M 216375 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 156207 $760.49* 06/19/95 $310.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY PRO SHOP CABINETS 060995 060995 GOLF PROG CLUB HOUSE MACH. & EQUIP SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/95 $340.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY GENERAL REPAIR GRILL CABINET 060995 GOLF PROG CIP 06/19/95 $37Q.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY 156208 $1,020.00* 06/19/95 $219.71 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2603640 R043410 LIQUOR 50TH ST CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $12.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2623500 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 06/19/95 $57.55 $139.20 BERTELSON BROS. BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2623500 CENT SVC GENER 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $57.55 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2623500 2610170 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 2092 06/19/95 $17.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2623500 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 06/19/95 $57.55 $6.58 BERTELSON BROS. BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2623500 PARK ADMIN. BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $5.99 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 2623500 2589060 PW GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 06/19/95 $21.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2603630 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 1762 06/19/95 06/19/95 $37.47 $216.94 BERTELSON BROS. BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2603700 ANIMAL CONTROL CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 1762 2003 06/19/95 $38.30 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2602790 2603600 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 2003 06/19/95 $466.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. 156209 $1,354.47* 06/19/95 $228.36 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS 0 REPAIR PARTS 18168 018781 CITY HALL GENE ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 1416 1756 06/19/95 $81.37 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS O GENERAL SUPPLIES 156210 $309.73* 06/19/95 $118.00 BEST MAID COOKIE COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 1367 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 156211 $118.00* L COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Wi9�95 06/19/95 $5, 8:73 . 4 9 $5,873.49 BPE 9P HN lile BFI OF MN INC Rspuss REFUSE 05si95 053195 50TH STREET RU 50TH STREET RU PROF stltvTCE�__ PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $24.80 BFI OF MN INC RUBBISH REMOVAL 0531 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 06/19/95 $60.00 BFI OF MN INC RUBBISH REMOVAL 053195 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 156212 $? 1- �;- ---�'_ , 690036 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 156215 $5'9$65.26 06/19/95 BIFFS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS BI048833 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $65.26 BIFFS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS BI048832 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $130.52 BIFFS INC RUBBISH REMOVAL 131048831 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 156213 $261.04* CONT ED /POLICE 060895 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $40.00 BIGHAM, DONNA REFUND SWIMMING 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156214 $40.00* 06/19/95 $51.03 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 690036 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 156215 $51.03* 06/19/95 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156216 $100.00* 06/19/95 $27.00 BOLKS, JEFFREY CONT ED /POLICE 060895 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156217 $27.00* 06/19/95 $181.08 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 407172 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1665 06/19/95 $45.54 BOYER TRUCKS CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 303733. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $43.84 BOYER TRUCKS CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 378649. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 8476 06/19/95 $51.89 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 406363 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1642 06/19/95 $146.15 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 406624 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1649 06/19/95 $82.15 BOYER TRUCKS REPAIR PARTS 405940 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1624 156218 $550.65* 06/19/95 - $25.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE MEETING REFUND 060995 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $31.02 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS SOLD F 060995 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $15.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE REFUND HANDICAP FEES 060995 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 06/19/95 $30.08 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 060995 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 06/19/95 $50.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE REFUND BANQUET ROOM 060995 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PROP 06/19/95 $53.23 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS SOLD F 060995 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $40.45 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE LUMBER 060995 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 06/19/95 $179.95 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 060995 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $33.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SERVICE CHARGE 060995 GOLF PROG CASH OVER AND 156219 $407.73* 06/19/95 $45.00 BRAUN INTERTEC PROF ENG SERVICES 060575 UTILITIES -GRAN CIP 06/19/95 $450.00 BRAUN INTERTEC PROF ENG SERVICES 060561 SIDEWALK CIP 156220 $495.00* 06/19/95 $170.40 BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 12061 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 1045 156221 $170.40* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -------- PO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $775.70 BRINDAR DESIGN COST OF GOODS - PRO 46179 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8409 06/19/95 $854.88 BRINDAR DESIGN COST OF GOODS - PRO 46903 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8409 1.56222 $1,630.58* 06/19/95 $8.58 BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 3763037 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 1780 156223 $8.58* 06/19/95 $237.40 BROCK WHITE TRAINING AIDS 76964901 FIRE DEPT. GEN TRAINING AIDS 1245 06/19/95 $182.58 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 76697101 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 1433 156224 $419.98* 06/19/95 $40.00 BRUMFIELD, ADRIANE SERVICES CL /EB 062495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156225 $40.00* 06/19/95 $15.00 BUD OLSEN AWARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 060395 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $9.75 BUD OLSEN AWARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 050295 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 156226 $24.75* 06/19/95 $158.75 BUD OLSON AWARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 061095 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 1388 156227 $158.75* 06/19/95 $30.74 BUIE, BARBARA TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 060695 ED BUILDING & TREES.FLWR SHR 06/19/95 $18.07 BUIE, BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 060695 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 06/19/95 $10.03 BUIE, BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 060695 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $68.62 BUIE, BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES SOLD F 060695 060695 ED BUILDING & POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 06/19/95 $36.69 $5.38 BUIE, BARBARA BUIE, BARBARA COST.OF GOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 061295 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $33.45 BUIE, BARBARA COST OF GOODS SOLD F 061295 POOL TRACK GRE CST OF GD FOOD 156228 $202.98* 06/19/95 $51.34 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451307 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 1991 06/19/95 $81.33 BUILDERS SQUARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 14451308 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 2093 156229 $132.67* 06/19/95 $16.07 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPOR BOOKS 754421 CENT SVC GENER BOOKS & PAMPHL 156230 $16.07* 06/19/95 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156231 $100.00* 06/19/95 $69.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY GLASSES 3962028 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 8624 06/19/95 $76.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY GLASSES 3961296 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 8624 156232 $145.00* 06/19/95 $517.71 CADY COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 124394 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 9583 156233 $517.71* 06/19/95 $222.90 CALLAHAN, FRAN MILEAGE MAY 1995 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE 156234 $222.90* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 7 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 06/19/95 $1,076.28 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO 341959 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9032 06/19/95 $1,627.89 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO 334673 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9032 06/19/95 $1,269.70 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO 299316 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9032 156235 $3,973.87* 06/19/95 $50.00 CANTON; JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 061395 FINANCE MILEAGE 156236 $50.00* 06/19/95 $705.30 CARLSON PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 62690 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI P2089 156237 $705.30* 06/19/95 $100.00 CARLSON, CRAIG SERVICES CL /EB 070195 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156238 $100.00* 06/19/95 $294.90 CATCO PARTS & SERVICE CYLINDER 376904 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1553 156239 $294.90* 06/19/95 $28.72 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 377779 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1914 156240 $28.72* 06/19/95 $82.80 CDP GENERAL SUPPLIES 2142237 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 156241 $82.80* 06/19/95 $12.00 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 567631 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $52.50 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS 567734 CONTINGENCIES POSTAGE 156242 $64.50* 06/19/95 $146.00 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 051595/P GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $92.13 CELLULAR ONE PHONE RENTAL 051995/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 06/19/95 $117.99 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 05 30 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $145.42 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 060995/B INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $55.89 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 5 30 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $26.33 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHONE 0530 95 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1805 06/19/95 $64.33 CELLULAR ONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 0519 /FIR FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 156243 $648.09* 06/19/95 $79.88 CELLULAR ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 64685 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1254 156244 $79.88* 06/19/95 $3,278.00 CENTERLINE IND INC PAINT 6250 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 9554 156245 $3,278.00* 06/19/95 $27.20 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIE COST OF GOODS SOLD 21238 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 1969 156246 $27.20* 06/19/95 $115.82 CERES WOOD PRODUCTS TREE MULCH 012734 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 1455 156247 $115.82* 06/19/95 $227.33 CERTIFIED POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 148278 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1800 Page 8 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT -------- PO -NUM�- ------------------------------------------------------------- 156248 $227.33* 06/19/95 $138.00 CHOICEWOODS BLDG PERMIT CANCELLE 053195 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI Ir5249 $138.00* 06/19/95 $24.32 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 0505 ED BUILDING & SEWER & WATER 156250 $24.32* 06/19/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI WINDOW CLEANING 70790 70791 YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVI WINDOW SERVI WINDOW CLEANING WINDOW CLEANING 70792 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE :!56251 $47.13* 06/19/95 $33.71 CLAPP, ROBERT OVERPAYMENT WATER BI 060995 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. 156252 $33.71* 06/19/95 $75.00 CLELAND, BRUCE SERVICES CL /EB 062295 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156253 $75.00* 06/19/95 $375.34 CLEVELAND GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO 44191RI PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1021 156254 $375.34* 06/19/95 $456.71 COBRA GOLF INC COST OF GOODS - PRO 12153711 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9029 9029 06/19/95 $534.47 COBRA GOLF INC COST OF GOODS - PRO 204949 PRO SHOP 156255 $991.18* 06/19/95 $133.85 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 04265871 50TH ST SELLIN SELLING CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $289.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M GOODS SOLD M 04160478 04063938 YORK YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $146.10 COCA COLA BOTTLING COM BOTTLING COM COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD M 04220447 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 06/19/95 $130.35 $384.55 COCA COLA COCA COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD M 04277751 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156256 $1,084.60* 06/19/95 $222.70 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP PROF ENG SERVICES 129470 STREET IMPROVE IMPROV BA CIP CIP 06/19/95 $149.48 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP PROF ENG SERVICES 129470 ST. 156257 $372.18* 06/19/95 $500.55 CONCRETE SAWING INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1069 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 1423 156258 $500.55* 06/19/95 $85.31 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 50903200 5028 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME GENERAL SUPPLI 1452 1419 06/19/95 $305.90 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID KIT 156259 $391.21* 06/19/95 $160.90 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO CRAFT SUPPLIES 017354 ART CENTER ADM ART SUPPLY GIF CRAFT SUPPLIES CST OF GD FOOD 9711 9711 06/19/95 $118.75 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 017354 156260 $279.65* 06/19/95 $60.19 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. BLUELINE PAPER 415533 ENGINEERING GE ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING BLUE PRINTING 1890 1753 06/19/95 $12.46 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. MYLAR REPRODUCTION 0415045 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $62.65 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. BLUELINE PAPER & PRI 0414751 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 1722 06/19/95 $35.31 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. PRINTING REPRODUCTIO 0414689 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 1721 156261 $170.61* 06/19/95 $115.00 COSTELLO, TOM REFUND TENNIS 053195 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 06/19/95 -$30.00 COSTELLO, TOM REFUND TENNIS 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156262 $145.00* 06/19/95 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J PROFESSIONAL SERVICE JUNE 199 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 156263 $1,386.67* 06/19/95 $29.30 CULLIGAN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 053195 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES 156264 $29.30* 06/19/95 $430.83 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 5879517 LABORATORY EQUIP REPLACEM 1545 156265 $430.83* 06/19/95 $500.70 CURTIS 1000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21657010 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE P2018 156266 $500.70* 06/19/95 $58.55 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. ,REPAIR PARTS 72791 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1735 156267 $58.55* 06/19/95 $32.00 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 508731 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI 156268 $32.00* 06/19/95 $346.60 DAN G JOHNSON PLBG CONTRACTED REPAIRS 052395 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 156269 $346.60* 06/19/95 $60.00 DANS REGISTER SERVICE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 060195 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 156270 $60.00* 06/19/95 $412.79 DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY COST OF GOODS SOLD F 060195 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 156271 $412.79* 06/19/95 $89.22 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 9035 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1512 06/19/95 $141.73 DAYSTARTER REPAIR PARTS 11082 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1772 156272 $230.95* 06/19/95 $249.21 DE- SIGNER SIGNS & POSTS 31610 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 1539 156273 $249.21* 06/19/95 $38.62 DEXTER COST OF GOODS - PRO 284494 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8405 156274 $38.62* 06/19/95 $254.28 DMJ CORPORATION CONSTRUCTION 94 -7 #1 ALLEY IMPROVE CIP 156275 $254.28* 06/19/95 $46.48 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3051 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8410 06/19/95 $621.71 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3083 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8410 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT --------PO-NUM_- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156276 $668.19* 06/19/95 $87.50 DONAGHUE DOORS DOOR REPAIR 10029 50TH ST OCCUPA EQUIP MAINT 156277 $87.50* 06/19/95 $106.56 DORNSEIF, DAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 061395 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE 156278 $106.56* 06/19/95 $920.88 DPC INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS 01101266 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 9817 156279 $920.88* 06/19/95 $328.69 DUCKSTER COST OF GOODS - PRO 5002354 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8415 156280 $328.69* 06/19/95 $499.50 EARL F. ANDERSON PLAYGROUND REPAIRS 00141167 PATHS & HARD S REPAIR PARTS LINE MARK POWD 1190 1454 06/19/95 $156.55 EARL F. ANDERSON FIELD PAINT 00141008 FIELD MAINTENA 06/19/95 $44,949.00 EARL F. ANDERSON PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 00141247 PARK CIP CIP 156281 $45,605.05* 06/19/95 $182.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 527367 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX BEE 06/19/95 $1,975.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 527366 YORK SELLING ST SELLIN CST OF GDS CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,856.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD GOODS SOLD B M 527365 527365 50TH 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 06/19/95 $15.90 $1,367.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD B 527402 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,679.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 525078 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE GDS BEE 06/19/95 $323.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD B B 524739 525079 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST OF CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,834.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS 156282 $9,235.05* 06/19/95 $106.50 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATIO SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 3335112 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/95 $90.53 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATIO SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 3335116 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 156283 $197.03* 06/19/95 $137.50 EDINA ART FAIR FEE FOR GREEN KEY IN 060195 HUMAN RELATION PRO SVC OTHER 156284 $137.50* 06/19/95 $1,745.00 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCAT CONT ED 04007940 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156285 $1,745.00* 06/19/95 $132.71 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB YEAR END MEETING 053195 LIQUOR 50TH ST MEETING EXPENS 06/19/95 $132.71 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB YEAR END MEETING 053195 LIQUOR YORK GE MEETING EXPENS EXPENS 06/19/95 $132.71 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB YEAR END MEETING 053195 VERNON LIQUOR MEETING 156286 $398.13* 06/19/95 $41.28 EDINA FIVE 0 FLORIST GENERAL SUPPLIES 051895 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 156287 $41.28* 06/19/95 $272,538.56 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS CONSTRUCTION 95 -1 #3 STREET IMPROVE CIP 156288 $272,538.56* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $680.23 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 55631 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 1182 156289 $680.23* 06/19/95 $96.65 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE SOFTWARE 19556356 PARK CIP CIP 1901 156290 $96.65* 06/19/95 $51.00 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MA E -83 REPAIRS 8066 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $448.50 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MA PUMP REPAIR E -83 8061 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 156291 $499.50* 06/19/95 $284.63 ESS BROS & SONS CASTINGS 1345 GENERAL STORM CASTINGS 1402 156292 $284.63* If 06/19/95 $42.12 ETONIC - TRETORN COST OF GOODS - PRO 1786604 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1489 156293 $42.12* 06/19/95 $22.37 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES C23810 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 1958 156294 $22.37* 06/19/95 $152.44 FASTSIGN LIQUOR & WINE SIGNS 3388 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 1605 06/19/95 $346.52 FASTSIGN „GENERAL SUPPLIES 3441 ED BUILDING,& GENERAL SUPPLI 1688 156295 $498.96* 06/19/95 $554.19 FEED RITE CONTROL CHEMICALS 61210 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 06/19/95 $3,173.56 FEED RITE CONTROL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 60780 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS P1493 156296 $3,727.75* 06/19/95 $181.42 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN UFC 1994 28127 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL 1249 156297 $181.42* 06/19/95 $395,806.25 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST EDINBO 051595 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 06/19/95 $19,802.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 051595 GOLF ADMINISTR INTEREST BONDS 06/19/95 $27,450.00 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 051595 GOLF ADMINISTR INTEREST BONDS 06/19/95 $65,271.25 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 051595 GOLF ADMINISTR INTEREST BONDS 06/19/95 $65,185.50 FIRST TRUST BOND INTEREST 051595 ARENA ADMINIST INTEREST BONDS 156298 $573,515.00* 06/19/95 $30.00 FLAHERTY, LYNN REFUND TENNIS 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156299 $30.00* 06/19/95 $266.46 FLEET PRODUCTS TICKET HOLDER 905 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1015 156300 $266.46* 06/19/95 $356.94 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 232164 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 156301 $356.94* 06/19/95 $51.75 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3936903 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 06/19/95 $51.44 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3931723 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 06/19/95 $45.79 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3915603 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 06/19/95 $106.59 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO 3934650 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 Page 12 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION-- - - - - -- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM ------- OBJECT --- - - - -PO - - - - -- -NUM. _________ ________ 06/19/95 $425.25 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO 392161 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 156302 $680.82* 06/19/95 $87.47 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 75350 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1823 156303 $87.47* 06/19/95 $71.36 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST SUPPL 13475031 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 1683 156304 $71.36* 06/19/95 $99.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 2941401 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 156305 $99.00* 06/19/95 $136.32 FRICKE & SONS SON INC SOD & BLACK DIRT 053195 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 1734 156306 $136.32* 06/19/95 $73.32 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 6508 6766 BUILDING MAINT BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $73.07 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING LAUNDRY 6978 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $95.84 G & 156307 $242.23* 06/19/95 $367.64 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 052695/P 052695/P EQUIPMENT OPER ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $134.62 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 052695/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $178.90 G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 052695/P GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 06/19/95 06/19/95 $661.08 $302.31 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 052695/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPL 06/19/95 $259.59 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 052695/P 052695 PW BUILDING ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $52.32 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 156308 $1,956.46* 06/19/95 $42,428.89 G.L. CONTRACTING INC CONSTRUCTION 95 -3 /FNL WATERMAIN CIP 156309 $42,428.89* 06/19/95 $675.00 G.V. LARSEN & ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 060995 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 156310 $675.00* 06/19/95 $192.60 GENERAL SPORTS SOCCER NETS 040796 040801 ATHLETIC ACTIV POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $105.00 GENERAL SPORTS LIFEGUARD SUITS GENERAL SUPPLIES 040893 SKATING & HOCK GENERAL SUPPLI 1911 06/19/95 $467.00 GENERAL SPORTS 156311 $764.60* 06/19/95 $21.36 GLASS SERVICE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 1550647 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 1609 156312 $21.36* 06/19/95 $100.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVIC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 950606 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 1959 156313 $100.00* 06/19/95 $101,766.47 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTR CONSTRUCTION 95 -1 / #1 UTILITIES -GRAN CIP 156314 $101,766.47* 06/19/95 $226.50 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO 9249 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9028 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 13 CHECK NO =-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM'"- - ,k 06/19/95 $8.09.00 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO 9255 PR(l':SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 90028 06/19/95 $108.00 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO 9253 PRO :SHOP COST'OF GDS -PR 9028 06/19/95 $120.00 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO 9251 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9028 - 156315 $1,263.50* 06/19/95 $291.03 GOODIN CO. IRRIGATION PARTS 5496761 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 8915 156316 $291.03* 06/19/95 $271.58. GRAFIX SHOPPE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 12347 -, ANIMAL . :CONTROL . EQUIP REPLACEM 1376- 156317 $271.58* 06/19/95 $185.15 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49529912 - BUILDINGS REPAIR PARTS 1518 06/19/95 $29.95. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49864576 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 1790 156318 $215.10* 06/19/95 $833.61 GREER, PAT SERVICES CL/E13 061395.- ;- ED' ~ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 156319 $833.61* 06/19/95 $7,188.00 GREUPNER, JOSE GOLF LESSONS 661395 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF 156320 $7,188.00* 06/19/95 $18,746.69 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSPITALIZATION 3597146.-'CENT SVC GENER;,HOSPITALIZATIO 156321 $18,746.69* i 06/19/95 $220.29 H.L. MOORE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 8134605 FIRE DEPT. GEN:FIRST AID SUPP 1260 156322 $220.29* 06/19/95 $375.00 HANSON, LOUISE AMBULANCE FEES 060695 GENERAL?FD PRO.AMBULANCE FEES 156323 $375.00* 06/19/95 $40.00 HAPPY FACES SERVICES CL /EB 062495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156324 $401.00* 06/19/95 $48.06 HARDEN, DENISE CLASS REFUND 053095' ART_CNTR PROG 'REGISTRATION F 156325 $48.00* 06/19/95 $37,503.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. - INSURANCE 060195 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 06/19/95 $17,186.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 060195 CENT -SVC GENER INSURANCE 156326 $54,689.00* 06/19/95 $420.00 HARTLEIB, CECEILE AC INSTRUCTOR 061395 ART CENTER ADM'PROF SERVICES 156327 $420.00* 06/19/95 $91.50 HEDBERG AGGREGATES GENERAL SUPPLIES 40085 AARENA:BLDG /GRO:GENERAL SUPPLI 1620 156328 $91.50* - 06/19/95 $65.19 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT - SUPPLIES 061395 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 156329 $65.19* i 06/19/95 $379.95 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD F 053195 GRILL 1 CST OF GD FOOD 8142 i Page 14 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ----- -- ---- CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- 156330 $379.95* 06/19/95 $1,111.42 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF BOARD & ROOM PRISONE APRIL 19 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO 156331 $1,111.42* 06/19/95 $79.97 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC JT22539 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 156332 $79.97* 06/19/95 $372.75 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG LINE MARKING POWDER 033099 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1066 156333 $372.75* 06/19/95 $40.00 HOCH, ED REFUND SWIMMING 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156334 $40.00* 06/19/95 $100.00 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156335 $100.00* 06/19/95 $37.18 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 44266 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156336 $37.18* 06/19/95 $74.97 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO IN CHEMICALS 3516 3254 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS CHEMICALS 1814 1577 06/19/95 $121.94 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO IN CHEMICALS 156337 $196.91* 06/19/95 $247.80 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 060995 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE 156338 $247.80* 06/19/95 $495.23 HOSPITALITY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 12894 8019577 GRILL GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 9942 1391 06/19/95 $126.20 HOSPITALITY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8018069 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 1384 06/19/95 $125.67 HOSPITALITY SUPPLY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 8018069 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 1384 06/19/95 $125.67 HOSPITALITY 156339 2 $87$5412 HUEBSCH SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 810392 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/95 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 806670 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/95 $12.42 HUEBSCH 156340 $66.54* 06/19/95 $225.00 I.A.C.C.I. CONT ED /POLICE 060195 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156341 $225.00* 06/19/95 $135.00 I.A.C.P. CONT ED /POLICE 060295 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156342 $135.00* BOOKS A81578 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 06/19/95 $53.45 ICMA 156343 $53.45* 06/19/95 $195.00 INTERNATIONAL CONFEREN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS M87683 INSPECTIONS DUES & SUBSCRI 156344 $195.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 15 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 06/19/95 $351.19 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIE HEATER 126772 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1327 156345 $351.19* 06/19/95 $64.79 IOS FAX CARTRIDGE 44732A CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 156346 $64.79* 06/19/95 $82.50 ITE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 0608 PLANNING DUES & SUBSCRI 06/19/95 $82.50 ITE ITE PUBLICATION 165. ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI 156347 $165.00* 06/19/95 $44.46 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 52550177 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1639 06/19/95 $118.67 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 51759919 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1441 06/19/95 $224.49 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51859944 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 1449 06/19/95 $285.03 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 51059700 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1335 06/19/95 $174.40 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL 05195999 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 1516 156348 $847.05* 06/19/95 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156349 $100.00* 06/19/95 $23.97 JEMS SUBSCRIPTION - FIRE 053095 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI 156350 $23.97* 06/19/95 $1,657.16 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING F969 POOL ADMIN PRINTING 1261 06/19/95 $284.35 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 1546 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 1460 06/19/95 $48.50 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING F1665 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 1591 156351 $1,990.01* 06/19/95 $304.48 JIM HATCH SALES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5633 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1550 06/19/95 $103.96 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 5627 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 1529 156352 $408.44* 06/19/95 $114.22 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 061395 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 06/19/95 $26.17 JOHNSON, NAOMI OFFICE SUPPLIES 061395 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 06/19/95 $8.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI PRINTING 061395 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 156353 $148.39* 06/19/95 $39.84 JOHNSON, RALPH CONT ED /ASSESSING 053195 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 156354 $39.84* 06/19/95 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156355 $100.00* 06/19/95 $26.09 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERV REPAIR PARTS E313733 50TH ST OCCUPA REPAIR PARTS 1677 156356 $26.09* 06/19/95 $349.10 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 053195 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 06/19/95 $4.60 JP FOODSERVICES INC COURSE BEAUTIFICATIO 053195 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 06/19/95 $502.65 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 053195 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI t Page 16 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE ------------------------------- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 06/19/95 ___ __ $3,847.59 _ _ JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 053195 232838 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD GRILL CIP 9793 06/19/95 $693.66 JP FOODSERVICES INC HOT DOGGER COST OF GOODS SOLD F 0531 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $60.20 JP FOODSERVICES INC 156357 $5,457.80* 06/19/95 $338.55 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY TREES, FLOWERS, SHRU 85220 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 1760 156358 $338.55* 06/19/95 $292.73 JUSTUS LUMBER MACHINERY & EQUIPMEN 31018 35127 GOLF PROG CLUB HOUSE & MACH. EQUIP LUMBER 9703 1157 06/19/95 $25.30 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER PAINT 40564 ED BUILDING & PAINT 1 06/19/95 $102.07 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT 40189 ED BUILDING & PAINT 15558 58 06/19/95 $51.03 JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER MACHINERY & EQUIPMEN 33619 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 9876 06/19/95 $336.59 156359 $807.72* 06/19/95 $150.00 KAHN, DEBORAH MORSE MAGAZINE EXPENSES 053195 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 156360 $150.00* 06/19/95 $28.88 KANE, KENNETH CONT ED /POLICE 060895 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156361 $28.88* 06/19/95 $140.46 KAR PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 103805 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1826 156362 $140.46* 06/19/95 $30.60 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING COST OF GOODS - PRO PRO 2346787 2347553 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9335 9335 06/19/95 $119.60 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING COST OF GOODS - 156363 $150.20* 06/19/95 $31.39 KEHOE, TERRENCE MEETING EXPENSE 061395 INSPECTIONS MEETING EXPENS 156364 $31.39* 06/19/95 $58.82 KELLY DESIGN POOL SIGNS 95835 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES 156365 $58.82* 06/19/95 $40.00 KLEIN, DEBBIE REFUND SWIMMING 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156366 $40.00* 06/19/95 $29.81 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS SUPPLIES 157114 FIELD MAINTENA TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI 1637 06/19/95 $91.37 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL LUMBER 156400 BUILDING MAINT 1445 06/19/95 $160.51 KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 155993 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 1451 06/19/95 06/19/95 $70.97 $15.84 KNOX COMM KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 154779 GENERAL STORM ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 1398 1506 06/19/95 $144.53 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 155528 155265 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1412 06/19/95 $107.66 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER LUMBER 155897 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1442 06/19/95 $40.43 KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 157416 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1731 06/19/95 06/19/95 $17.89 $128.48 KNOX COMM KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 157097 ARENA BLDG /GRO PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI REPAIR PARTS 1727 1426 06/19/95 $37.89 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS LUMBER 155488 155423 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1422 06/19/95 $5.27 KNOX COMM CREDIT COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 155538 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1431 06/19/95 $21.47 KNOX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156367 $872.12* 06/19/95 $30.00 KOESTER, MARCIA REFUND TENNIS 060695 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156368 $30.00* 06/19/95 $40.00 KOMAR, KAREN REFUND SWIMMING 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156369 $40.00* 06/19/95 $523.05 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 133476 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $34.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 132932 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $1,261.85 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 132910 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $336.85 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 132932 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,083.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD B 133460 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 156370 $3,239.45* 06/19/95 $90.24 KULAK, AILEEN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 061395 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE 156371 $90.24* 06/19/95 $520.92 KUNDE CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 053195 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS 156372 $520.92* 06/19/95 $335.00 KUNKEL, JERRY TEMP HELP GOLF COURS 060195 RANGE SALARIES TEMP 156373 $335.00* 06/19/95 $30.00 KUYPER, SCOTT CONT ED /POLICE 060595 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156374 $30.00* 06/19/95 $30.00 KVASNICK, BARB SERVICES CL /EB 062995 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156375 $30.00* 06/19/95 $991.60 LA LOVING GENERAL SUPPLIES 253193 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 9052 156376 $991.60* 06/19/95 $158.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC POND TREATMENT 4772 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQUI 1389 06/19/95 $620.31 LAKE RESTORATION INC WATER TREATMENT SERV 393/1ST ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 1262 156377 $778.31* 06/19/95 $89.10 LANCRETE, LAURA MILEAGE MAY 1995 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 156378 $89.10* 06/19/95 $1,444.50 LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 996069 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 9555 156379 $1,444.50* 06/19/95 $30.00 LAVENTURE, MARTIN REFUND SWIMMING 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156380 $30.00* 06/19/95 $22.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT NEWS DUES /POLICE 060595 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI 156381 $22.00* 06/19/95 $288.96 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1266034 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1648 Page 18 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ---_- OBJECT ------- _PO -NUM_- 06/19/95 $135.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 1265126 1267130 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 1644 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1645 06/19/95 $57.14 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 1267131 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1645 06/19/95 $362.16 LAWSON PRODUCTS 156382 $844.01* 06/19/95 $28.64 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 053195 /G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY 053195 /A ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY 06/19/95 $42.47 LEEF BROS: INC. LAUNDRY 156383 $71.11* 06/19/95 $30.00 LEER, MAUREEN REFUND TENNIS 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156384 $30.00* 06/19/95 $131.40 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 43186 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156385 $131.40* 06/19/95 $1,462.40 LEITNER COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 060195 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 156386 $1,462.40* 06/19/95 $141.28 LESSMAN, GREG COST OF GOODS - PRO 7425 7377 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 90031 COST OF GDS -PR 9031 06/19/95 $222.21 LESSMAN, GREG COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS - PRO 7391 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9031 06/19/95 $72.00 LESSMAN, GREG 156387 $435.49* 06/19/95 $30.00 LEWIS, BARB REFUND COACH PITCH 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156388 $30.00* 06/19/95 $209.54 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 0601 CLUB HOUSE GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQUI CLEANING SUPPL 8144 06/19/95 $97.38 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL CLEANING SUPPLIES 060195 156389 $306.92* 06/19/95 $205.07 LIGHTS RIGHT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 123 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 1913 156390 $205.07* 06/19/95 $6.18 LINHOFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 281 252482 ADAPTIVE RECRE ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $23.00 LINHOFF GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 252113 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $10.75 LINHOFF 156391 $39.93* 06/19/95 $696.16 LOGIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AR0595 AR0595 ED ADMINISTRAT ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $42.88 LOGIS GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING AR0595 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN 06/19/95 $1,221.13 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0595 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN 06/19/95 $5,218.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0595 ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN 06/19/95 $2,121.95 LOGIS 156392 $9,301.02* 06/19/95 $272.32 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37745 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $408.48 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37793 37749 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $170.20 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37551 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $663.78 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37528 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $340.40 M AMUNDSON COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ----------------------------------------------=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $680.80 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD M 37646 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156393 $2,535.98* 06/19/95 $810.45 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOMS 2954517 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS P1013 156394 $810.45* 06/19/95 $30.00 MALONEY, JOHN CONT ED /FIRE 060895 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $6.00 MALONEY, JOHN MILEAGE /FIRE 060895 FIRE DEPT. GEN MILEAGE 156395 $36.00* 06/19/95 $34.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 391545 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $120.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 391548 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $32.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 390491 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $2,529.77 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391546 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $713.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 389229 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $20.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391550 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $10.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 383596. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $63.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 391592 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $2,107.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391593 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $51.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 391055 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $213.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391056 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $657.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 389891 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $18.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 389892 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $19.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 389893 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $2,696.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 389232 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $48.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 389233 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $57.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 389231 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,097.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 388725 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $13.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 389230 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $199.91 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391549 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $6.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391551 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $7.95 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 391547 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $18.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 394426 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 -$1.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 391546. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $22.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD M 394428 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $1,014.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 394427 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $80.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 053195/N NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 8145 06/19/95 $1,953.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD B 053195 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 8145 156397 $13,807.38* 06/19/95 $426.60 MARLIN INDUSTRIAL DIVI CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 060195 SUPERV. & OVRH CONF & SCHOOLS 2065 156398 $426.60* 06/19/95 $142.50 MCCARTHY, LOWELL MILEAGE 061295 WEED MOWING MILEAGE 156399 $142.50* 06/19/95 $132.18 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY CONTRACTED REPAIRS 053195 /G ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $1,500.61 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 053195/P EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $297.49 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 053195/P EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $10.32 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 053195/P FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI Page 20 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- -- - - - - -- INVOICE _ - PROGRAM - - -- ' OBJECT PO NUM. 06/19/95 ------------------------------ $42.55 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 053195/P 053195/P EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS ACCESSORIES 06/19/95 $591.45 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY- ACCESSORIES 156400 $2,574.60* 06/19/95 $23.75 MCKENZIE, TOM CONT ED /POLICE 060595 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156401 $23.75* 06/19/95 $305.15 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 116946 ED BUILDING & CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 1547 1548 06/19/95 $421.11 MCNEILUS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 117057 156402 $726.26* 06/19/95 $48.18 MECO REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 67596 67185 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS EQUIP REPLACEM 1684 1009 06/19/95 $592.85 MECO 156403 $641.03* 06/19/95 $100.65 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN HOSPITALIZATION 1361971 CENT SVC GENER SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO HOSPITALIZATIO 06/19/95 $26,870.76 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN HOSPITALIZATION 1358342 CENT 156404 $26,971.41* 06/19/95 $100.00 MERFELD, BURT POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156405 $100.00* 06/19/95 $497.88 MERIT SUPPLY ACCESSORIES 39208 39197 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLI 1655 1635 06/19/95 $404.43 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 39229 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 1813 06/19/95 06/19/95 $383.77 $392.18 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 39184 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 1686 1520 06/19/95 $111.45 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 39153 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI REPAIR PARTS 1835 06/19/95 $158.68 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS CLEANING SUPPLIES 39236 39227 ED BUILDING & ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 1820 06/19/95 $282.65 MERIT SUPPLY 156406 $2,231.04* 06/19/95 $257.19 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE FEES 052595 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 156407 $257.19* 06/19/95 $466.90 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 7479 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1333 156408 $466.90* 06/19/95 $35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES TRACT SEARCH 502791 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES 1765 156409 $35.00* 06/19/95 $460.00 MGA HANDICAP SERVICES 060295 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 156410 $460.00* 06/19/95 $3,940.00 MGA HANDICAPS PATRONS 060295 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 156411 $3,940.00* 06/19/95 $47.93 MGA RULE BOOKS 060795 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 156412 $47.93* 06/19/95 $240.00 MGCSA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 060895 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156413 $240.00* 06/19/95 $124.56 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPP GENERAL SUPPLIES 203427 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 1450 156414 $124.56* 06/19/95 $133.97 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 870MB DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $144.37 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 728MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 06/19/95 $36.05 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 728MB DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $71.03 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 870MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 06/19/95 $42.17 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 557MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 06/19/95 $3,266.82 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 1074MB DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $234.01 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 558MB DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $1,430.99 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 558MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $370.16 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 558MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $220.46 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 1011MB DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $98.12 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 1136MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 06/19/95 $44.82 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1136MB DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $858.22 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 1011MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $97.97 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 60019MB SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $961.30 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 60019MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $403.92 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 60019MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $68.56 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 60019MB DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 06/19/95 $502.14 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 1074MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 156416 $8,985.08* 06/19/95 $2,825.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPOR CONSTRUCTION 94 -8FNL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIP 156417 $2,825.00* 06/19/95 $48,896.98 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPOR CONSTRUCTION 94 -2 #9 ST. IMPROV BA CIP 156418 $48,896.98* 06/19/95 $481.55 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPL PAPER SUPPLIES 12371 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 1811 156419 $481.55* 06/19/95 $148.80 MIDWEST VENDING INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 272 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8147 06/19/95 $24.00 MIDWEST VENDING INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 294 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 156420 $172.80* 06/19/95 $536.76 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 115986 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 7275 156421 $536.76* 06/19/95 $135.55 MING -FEN NI CULTURAL EXPO DINNER 053195 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM 156422 $135.55* 06/19/95 $33.00 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER RENTAL 53761506 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 06/19/95 $75.06 MINN COMM PAGING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 22509606 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 156423 $108.06* 06/19/95 $350.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30650 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1950 156424 $350.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT ---- - - - -PO -NUM. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $823.73 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 061995 BUILDING MAINT ART CENTER BLD HEAT HEAT 06/19/95 $230.59 MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT 061995 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 06/19/95 $302.17 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 06/19/95 $408..64 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 06/19/95 $22.59 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 POOL OPERATION HEAT 06/19/95 $32.68 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 06/19/95 $288.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 06/19/95 $29.44 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 PW BUILDING HEAT 06/19/95 $2,005.04 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 06/19/95 $1,452.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 ED BUILDING & HEAT 06/19/95 $189.74 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 06/19/95 $85.46 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 GOLF DOME HEAT 06/19/95 $1,207.75 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 06/19/95 $53.97 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 ED BUILDING & HEAT 06/19/95 $558.29 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 06/19/95 $233.83 MINNEGASCO HEAT 061995 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 06/19/95 $2,073.27 MINNEGASCO 156426 $9,997.55* 06/19/95 $124.50 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 216374 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156427 $124.50* 06/19/95 $270.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 061295 ASSESSING PROF SERVICES 156428 $270.00* 06/19/95 $65.00 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 50347 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/95 $153.24 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQ 326635 156429 $218.24* GENERAL SUPPLIES 22841 DISTRIBUTIONM PIPE GENERAL SUPPLI 1778 06/19/95 $958.50 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP 156430 $1,082.15* 06/19/95 $360.00 MINNESOTA STATE BAR AS CONFERENCE 22553940 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS 156431 $360.00* 06/19/95 $614.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT ADVERTISING OTHER 0602950 COMMUNICATIONS L MI ADVERT OTHER SERVICES 06/19/95 $35.70 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT PROFESSIONAL ICE OTHER61472 0 EDADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 06/19/95 $249.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICAT ADVERTISING 156432 $898.70* 06/19/95 $132.67 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I23336 I29328 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 1458 1678 06/19/95 $35.57 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO DIST CO GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS I29072 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1657 06/19/95 $69.42 $151.20 MINNESOTA MINNESOTA TORO TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I25446 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1406 1863 06/19/95 06/19/95 $392.92 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I32010 I21062 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1359 06/19/95 $40.42 MINNESOTA MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES I21575 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 06/19/95 $15.85 $760.36 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I3801 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS. 9437 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $130.40 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS T23228 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS - - - -�` 1406 06/19/95 $408.96 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO FERTILIZER I28399 MAINT OF COURS FERTILIZER 1573' 06/19/95 - $91.13 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 03040 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $43.35 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO IRRIGATION PARTS 129116 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1732 _ 06/19/95 $429.30 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO IRRIGATION PARTS 124563 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1470 06/19/95 $151.04 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS I26409 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1406 06/19/95 - $260.90 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS C3179 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $242.61 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 131985 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1831 06/19/95 $285.80 MINNESOTA TORO DIST CO REPAIR PARTS 131785 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1831 156434 $2,937.84* 06/19/95 $42.75 MINNESOTA WANNER GENERAL SUPPLIES 25662 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1794 156435 $42.75* 06/19/95 $76.00 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL DATA PROCESSING 1456868 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 156436 $76.00* 06/19/95 $281.00 MN CROWN DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD W 003064 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 156437 $281.00* 06/19/95 $3,523.14 MN STATE TREA /BLG IN SURTAX 060795 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX 06/19/95 $152.35 MN STATE TREA /BLG IN BALANCE DUE 0607 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX 156438 $3,675.49* 06/19/95 $10.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNLIMI REPAIR PARTS 19275420 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1424 156439 $10.00* 06/19/95 $397.75 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 7642 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 8284 06/19/95 $365.22 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 8638 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 8741 06/19/95 $235.09 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 8199 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 8433 06/19/95 $115.65 MODEL STONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 11044 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9463 156440 $1,113.71* 06/19/95 $34.00 MOEN, ROSS CLASS REFUND 060795 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 156441 $34.00* 06/19/95 $11.18 MOPED WORLD REPAIR PARTS 82227 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1656 156442 $11.18* 06/19/95 $6,939.24 MPLS FINANCE DEPARTMEN WATER PURCHASED 060995 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE 156443 $6,939.24* 06/19/95 $60.00 MRS. BYRON RICHARDS REFUND TENNIS 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156444 $60.00* 06/19/95 $90.67 MUELLER SALES CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 01010993 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1244 156445 $90.67* 06/19/95 $867.00 MULTISCAPES INCORPORAT REPAIR PARTS 591 STREET REVOLVI REPAIR PARTS 1010 156446 $867.00* t Page 24 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT --------PO- NUM. - CHECK NO DATE -------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $350.39 MUNICILITE CO ACCESSORIES 6536 6559 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1525 1773 06/19/95 $432.39 MUNICILITE CO ACCESSORIES 156447 $782.78* 06/19/95 $50.00 NALEZNY, NANCY REFUND TENNIS 061395 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156448 $50.00* CRAFT SUPPLIES 754308 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 1590 06/19/95 $203.23 NASCO 156449 $203.23* 06/19/95 $56.87 NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 977920 VERNON OCCUPAN ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE ALARM SERVICE 06/19/95 $638.13 NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 1019280 156450 $695.00* 06/19/95 $326.11 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F 396637 399163 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $61.90 NERCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD F COST OF GOODS SOLD F 401703 POOL.CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $14.00 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB 156451 $402.01* 06/19/95 $867.98 NEDOROSKI, DAN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 060995 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 156452 $867.98* 06/19/95 $579.96 NELSON, DAVID CONT ED /POLICE 060695 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156453 $579.96* 06/19/95 $350.88 NELSON, MIKE WATER REFUND 060695 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. 156454 $350.88* 06/19/95 $265.93 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN SIGNS & POSTS 2032731 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 1432 156455 $265.93* RADIO SERVICE 777234 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 3773 06/19/95 $103.50 NEXTEL 156456 $103.50* 06/19/95 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156457 $100.00* 06/19/95 $31.03 NOOLEEN, DONALD AMBULANCE FEES 060695 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 156458 $31.03* 06/19/95 $162.98 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 107196 106943 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1730 1474 06/19/95 $8.52 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 107119 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1474 06/19/95 $24.52 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 107004 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1474 06/19/95 $22.68 NORTH STAR TURF TURF CONTRACTED REPAIRS 105466 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 19001 06/19/95 $876.51 NORTH STAR NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 107623 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1824 06/19/95 $193.19 156459 $1,288.40* 06/19/95 $515.50 NORTHEAST METRO INTERM TUITION WOODCOCK 15981 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $100.43 NORTHEAST METRO INTERM CONFERENCES & SCHOOL 16204 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $282.00 NORTHEAST METRO INTERM TUITION - FORSETH 15957 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 156460 $897.93* 06/19/95 $25.91 NORTHERN AIRE GENERAL SUPPLIES 12481 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 156461 $25.91* 06/19/95 $54.73 NORTHERN AIRGAS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 20854 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 8125 156462 $54.73* 06/19/95 $35.94 NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 44420532 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1179 156463 $35.94* 06/19/95 $.90 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 68950. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $54.00 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 71083 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $36.00 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 66457 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $74.40 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 68713 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $36.30 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 68950 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $37.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 69335 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $148.40 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 70474 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $60.48 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 69824 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $47.10 NORTHSTAR ICE 'COST OF GOODS SOLD M 70476 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $83.16 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 68715 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 156464 $577.94* 06/19/95 $225.28 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD 231674 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 1594 06/19/95 $450.15 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPP COST OF GOODS SOLD 231707 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 1598 156465 $675.43* 06/19/95 $218.80 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW20639 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1161 06/19/95 $404.23 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW20720 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1161 06/19/95 $80.24 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW20757 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1161 156466 $703.27* 06/19/95 $6,612.41 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $614.10 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $604.41 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $362.19 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $1,084.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $61.50 NSP POWER & LIGHT 061995 AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $59.29 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $6,906.56 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $4,699.09 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $671.16 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $19,925.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $1,086.43 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $2,466.15 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $263.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $44.79 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $7.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER Page 26 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------ INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------- PO -NUM_- --------------------------------------------------------------- __ ________ 06/19/95 _ $122.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 061995 ST LIGHTING RE GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & LIGHT & POWER POWER 06/19/95 $339.85 NSP LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 061995 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $1,587.43 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $2,426.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $575.82 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $494.94 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $2,530.12 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $62.17 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $7.83 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $267.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER 061995 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 06/19/95 $3,295.97 NSP 156468 $57,232.38* 06/19/95 $192.00 ODLAND, DOROTHY AC INSTRUCTOR 061395 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 156469 $192.00* 06/19/95 $413.37 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 99331 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1979 156470 $413.37* 06/19/95 $2,375.05 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPUTER 486 260285 259834 ICE ARENA PROG GOLF PROG MACH. & MACH. & EQUIP EQUIP 1490 1723 06/19/95 $210.11 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM PRINTER MEMORY 156471 $2,585.16* 06/19/95 $105.64 ORDER UP CONT ED /POLICE 10909 10870 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. G CONF & CONF & SCHOOLS SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $116.83 ORDER UP CONT ED /POLICE CONT ED /POLICE 10938 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 06/19/95 $111.23 ORDER UP 156472 $333.70* 06/19/95 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 3770060 GRILL CST OF CST OF GD FOOD GD FOOD 8155 8155 06/19/95 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SOLD F 3770260 GRILL 156473 $148.00* 06/19/95 $46.84 P.F.M. CONT ED 96665 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156474 $46.84* 06/19/95 $43.51 PAGING NETWORK OF MINN TELEPHONE A014788 A013191 COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. G TELEPHONE EQUIP RENTAL 06/19/95 $37.91 PAGING NETWORK OF MINN EQUIPMENT RENTAL 156475 $81.42* 06/19/95 $142.70 PAMECO CORPORATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 4106914 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI 1407 156476 $142.70* 06/19/95 $95.80 PAPERDIRECT INC MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER 76125800 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 1907 156477 $95.80* 06/19/95 $99.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSI 062795 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 156478 $99.00* 06/19/95 $38.56 PARK VACUUM CENTER REPAIR PARTS 060295 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156479 $38.56* 06/19/95 $168.16 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1010275 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $309.34 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1004812 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $40.77 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1009948 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 •$44.00 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1011161 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $4.77 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1009851 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 156480 $567.04* 06/19/95 $40.00 PATTIWORKS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 1045 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 156481 $40.00* 06/19/95 $123.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51753 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $295.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51751 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $432.25 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 57732 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $27.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 51989 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $274.90 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51992 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $27.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 51988 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $253.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51991 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $305.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51990 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 156482 $1,741.65* 06/19/95 $41.74 PEDERSON, EDWARD CONT ED /ASSESSING 053095 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 156483 $41.74* 06/19/95 $426.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 24608008 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 06/19/95 $115.85 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 27093413 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $1,879.20 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD F 053195 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 156484 $2,421.05* 06/19/95 $2,500.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS FEE FOR SERVICE JI48403 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES 156485 $2,500.00* 06/19/95 $159.90 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD M 01349 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $264.85 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD B 01344 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 156486 $424.75* 06/19/95 $368.26 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 1600857 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1069 06/19/95 $159.91 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 1604375 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1767 06/19/95 - $49.43 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 1604667 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 06/19/95 $49.43 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 1604376 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1664 156487 $528.17* 06/19/95 $472.75 PIP PRINTING GREEN KEY INN 14015993 COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING 1906 06/19/95 $191.27 PIP PRINTING GREEN KEY INN 14016061 COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING 1905 156488 $664.02* 06/19/95 $34.08 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 897589 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 156489 $34.08* Page 28 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ------------------------------ INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -------- PO -NUM. ___ 06/19/95 __ $14,989.00 _ POLAR CHEVROLET EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN S9313802 POLICE DEPT. G FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 7928 EQUIP REPLACEM 9278 06/19/95 $185.00 POLAR CHEVROLET TINT GLASS -TAHOE SJ389432 156490 $15,174.00* 06/19/95 $167.74 POLLY NORMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 060495 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 1994 156491 $167.74* 06/19/95 $26.89 POMMER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 038883 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 1.56492 $26.89* 06/19/95 $225.00 POSTMASTER SENIOR NEWSLETTER PO 060995 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 156493 $225.00* 06/19/95 $3,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE /WATER DEPART 053095 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 156494 $3,000.00* 06/19/95 $292.88 PRAIRIE RESTORATION IN RESTORATION 052285 GC CIP CIP 156495 $292.88* 06/19/95 $439.59 PRECISION TURF /CHEM CHEMICALS 6033 005987 MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS 1737 REPAIR PARTS 1567 06/19/95 $81.58 PRECISION TURF /CHEM REPAIR PARTS 156496 $521.17* 06/19/95 $132.94 PRIMESCAPE TOOLS 66045 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 1673 156497 $132.94* 06/19/95 $29.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 11275 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT 156498 $29.00* 06/19/95 $108.08 PRO GROUP, INC COST OF GOODS - PRO PRO 1403127 1402319 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8415 COST OF GDS -PR 8415 06/19/95 $86.58 PRO GROUP, INC COST OF GOODS - 156499 $194.66* 06/19/95 $60.83 PROFESSIONAL METRO TEM GRILL HELP 3493 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 156500 $60.83* 06/19/95 $355.50 RAFIKI & ASSOCIATES IN COST OF GOODS SOLD W 1091 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 156501 $355.50* 06/19/95 $261.55 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 00533 00533 CLUB HOUSE CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $129.20 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 00533 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 06/19/95 $144.50 RED WING SHOES 156502 $535.25* 06/19/95 $484.69 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6018 6021 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 1685 GENERAL SUPPLI 1960 06/19/95 $467.41 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 156503 $952.10* IN CST OF GDS BEE Y RK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1$ 923.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 134759 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $1,181.05 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 134067 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,471.86 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 133973 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,925.29 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 133894 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $32.45 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD M 134760 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $2,257.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 134769 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $576.10 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 134767 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 - $67.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 64537 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 156504 $9,566.63* 06/19/95 $27.00 RIEGERT, RON CONT ED /POLICE 060795 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156505 $27.00* 06/19/95 $68.00 RIFFENACH, ROSEMARY CLASS REFUND 053195 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 156506 $68.00* 06/19/95 $15.73 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR PARTS 154049 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1920 06/19/95 $277.97 ROAD RESCUE ACCESSORIES 154004 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1536 156507 $293.70* 06/19/95 $41.27 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 48000 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 8127 156508 $41.27* 06/19/95 $1,047.82 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 46716 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 156509 $1,047.82* 06/19/95 $368.00 ROTO ROOTER SERV. REPAIR PARTS 9522087 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1546 156510 $368.00* 06/19/95 $1,298.61 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ C REPAIR PARTS 80360 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9781 06/19/95 $40,553.07 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ C OIL DIST TRUCK 80633 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 7718 156511 $41,851.68* 06/19/95 $120.00 RUSSELL, DEBLYN AC INSTRUCTOR 061395 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 156512 $120.00* 06/19/95 $92.73 SAFETY WEAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 256410 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1827 156513 $92.73* 06/19/95 $56.58 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMM GENERAL SUPPLIES 060795 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 156514 $56.58* 06/19/95 $425.98 SANIFILL INC RUBBISH REMOVAL 0047843 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 156515 $425.98* 06/19/95 $56.24 SANKEY, MOREAU J CONT ED /ASSESSING 0601950 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 156516 $56.24* 06/19/95 $830.70 SCENIC AERIAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 8771 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 1136 156517 $830.70* z ' s Page 30 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT --- -- - - - - ------- -NUM_- 06/19/95 __ $130.74 SCHAFER EQUIP CO ----------------------------------------- TOOLS 176778 PUMP LIFT ST TOOLS 1515 156518 $130.74* 06/19/95 $57.80 SCHENCK, LAURA MILEAGE 0515 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE 156519 $57.80* 06/19/95 $1,259.00 SCHLOSSER, KAY SHARKEY AC INSTRUCTOR 061395 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 156520 $1,259.00* 06/19/95 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156521 $100.00* 06/19/95 $387.90 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES 58977 58241 ARENA BLDG /GRO STREET NAME SI PAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1808 1400 06/19/95 $260.91 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 49455 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 1314 06/19/95 $228.86 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 156522 $877.67* 06/19/95 $33.91 SHUR -TOOL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 20573 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1643 156523 $33.91* 06/19/95 $50.00 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTE REPAIR SURVEY EQUIPM 638RI ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 1834 156524 $50.00* 06/19/95 $60.00 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMU ADVERTISING LEGAL CPC03634 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 156525 $60.00* 06/19/95 $745.65 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 51000 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $1,688.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B SOLD B 50883 50998 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $3,650.95 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 50999 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $145.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 51000 SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 06/19/95 $23.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS DISTRIBUTORS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 50885 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $593.00 SOUTHSIDE 156526 $6,847.45* 06/19/95 $180.00 SPALDING COST OF GOODS - PRO 156513 JK7193 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9023 9023 06/19/95 $191.70 SPALDING COST OF GOODS - PRO 156527 $371.70* 06/19/95 $200.00 SPORTMART GIFT CERTIFICATES 061295 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 156528 $200.00* REPAIR PARTS 2372498 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 1658 06/19/95 $39.95 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2367948 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1448 06/19/95 $92.38 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2367272 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1440 06/19/95 $$92.55 SPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2368765 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 1513 06/19/95 $86.24 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2367271 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 1793 06/19/95 $26.94 SPS 156529 $450.06* 06/19/95 $499.49 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN SM02336 EQUIPMENT REPL GENERAL MAINT EQUIP REPLACEM TOOLS 1324 .1106 06/19/95 $692.25 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT TOOLS 2337 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 31 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156530 $1,191.74* 06/19/95 $943.52 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 0531 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $1,583.64 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 053195 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 06/19/95 $121.80 STAR TRIBUNE AUCTION 053195 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPER 156531 $2;648.96* 06/19/95 $350.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA CPV PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 060159 EQUIPMENT OPER PROF SERVICES 156532 $350.00* 06/19/95 $201.00 STITCH -IT INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 0122195 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 1748 156533 $201.00* 06/19/95 $825.90 STREICHERS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 245711 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 9928 156534 $825.90* 06/19/95 $1,231.60 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 9/092165 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $292.50 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 1- 091020 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $115.00 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 4- 094206 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $126.80 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 3- 094206 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $195.00 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH ,PROF ENG SERVICES 4- 094214 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $165.00 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 13 -08709 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 156535 $2,125.90* 06/19/95 $11.18 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 225553 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1867 06/19/95 $22.37 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 225359 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1841 06/19/95 $15.86 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 225411 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1951 06/19/95 $178.63 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 205555 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1783 06/19/95 $20.97 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES 225257 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1807 06/19/95 $112.62 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES 225384 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1853 06/19/95 $56.32 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES 225075 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1662 06/19/95 $316.31 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES 225031 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1654 06/19/95 $85.26 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES 225265 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1662 06/19/95 $15.23 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 224670 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1629 06/19/95 $617.26 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 205669 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1429 06/19/95 $24.53 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 224233 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1420 06/19/95 $11.27 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 224760 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1782 156536 $1,487.81* 06/19/95 $256.07 SUBURBAN PROPANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 70519 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3774 156537 $256.07* 06/19/95 $1,488.50 SULLIVAN, DAVID COST OF GOODS - PRO 10540 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8400 06/19/95 $652.52 SULLIVAN, DAVID COST OF GOODS - PRO 1035 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8400 156538 $2,141.02* 06/19/95 $196.00 SULLIVAN, MONICA AC INSTRUCTOR 061395 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 156539 $196.00* 06/19/95 $132.90 SUPERAMERICA GASOLINE APRIL EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE Page 32 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------------ VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT --------PO- NUM. - -------------------- 156540 $132.90* 06/19/95 $16,363.73 SUPERIOR FORD 1/2 TON FORD PICK -UP 7176 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 8384 156541•. $16,363.73* 06/19/95 $876.95 SURGE WATER COND CONTRACTED REPAIRS R031798 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 1725 156542 $876.95* 06/19/95 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156543 $100.00* 06/19/95 $24.44 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 005209 ART CENTER ADM CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 1761 1761 06/19/95 $12.83 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 005209 005209 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1761 06/19/95 $6.62 SYSTEM SUPPLY 156544 $43.89* 06/19/95 $31.93 TARGET CLEANING SUPPLIES 42535 38184 POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION CLEANING SUPPL CLEANING SUPPL 06/19/95 $2.18 TARGET CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 54088 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $17.02 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 38184 POOL CONCESSIO GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $5.99 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 70242 POOL CONCESSIO GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $7.60 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 42535 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $32.60 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 70242 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $2.79 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 48681 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $$2.91 TARGET 156545 $165.02* 06/19/95 $170.39 TARGET REPAIR PARTS 765992 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1046 156546 $170.39* 06/19/95 $193.64 TAYLOR MADE COST OF GOODS - PRO 01291139 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9431 156547 $193.64* 06/19/95 $5.00 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CE GENERAL SUPPLIES 051695. GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 156548 $5.00* 06/19/95 $70.44 TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 4272 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 1888 156549 $70.44* 06/19/95 $648.99 THE CIT GROUP /COMMERCI COST OF GOODS - PRO 24157 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8403 156550 $648.99* 06/19/95 $59.11 THE KANE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 6359527 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 156551 $59.11* 06/19/95 $486.17 THE PRINT SHOP MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 26595 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1382 156552 $486.17* 06/19/95 $158.70 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 4672 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $190.05 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W GOODS SOLD B 4671 4670 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $76.20 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 33 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 06/19/95 $215.70 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 4669 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $243.05 THE WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 4941 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 156553 $883.70* 06/19/95 $33,351.18 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUC CONSTRUCTION 94 -6 #3 SIDEWALK CIP 156554 $33;351.18* 06/19/95 $43,324.72 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUC CONSTRUCTION 94 -10 #2 SIDEWALK CIP 156555 $43,324.72* 06/19/95 $11,837.05 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 94279 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES 156556 $11,837.05* 06/19/95 $4,520.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 58212 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 - $12.35 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 58212. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $267.80 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 58555 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $866.10 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD B 58768 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 156557 $5,641.55* 06/19/95 $69.00 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 319953 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1640 06/19/95 $38.57 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP WELDING SUPPLIES 319518 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1570 156558 $107.57* 06/19/95 $150.72 TOMBSTONE PIZZA CORPAR COST OF GOODS SOLD F 38707297 POOL CONCESSIO CST OF GD FOOD 156559 $150.72* 06/19/95 $9.00 TRANSWORLD SYSTEM INC AMBULANCE FEES 060195 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 156560 $9.00* 06/19/95 $315.20 TREADWAY GRAPHICS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN A1784 RESERVE PROGRA EQUIP REPLACEM 1992 156561 $315.20* 06/19/95 $14.73 TRETTEL, KATHY REIMBURSEMENT /CL /EB 060995 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 156562 $14.73* 06/19/95 $40.00 TURCO, BETH REFUND SESSION II 0602950 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156563 $40.00* 06/19/95 $148.14 TURF SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 054158 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1733 156564 $148.14* 06/19/95 $244.37 TWIN CITY TRUCK EQ INC REPAIR PARTS 53345 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 8974 156565 $244.37* 06/19/95 $675.00 UHL CO REPAIR PARTS 71293 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 9466 156566 $675.00* 06/19/95 $35.88 UNDIS, PAT CRAFT SUPPLIES 061395 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 156567 $35.88* r Page 34 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION -- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO -NUM_ - ______ 06/19/95 $390.77 --------------------------- UNISTRUT NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 93194 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 1543 156568 $390.77* 06/19/95 $75.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT CONT ED /POLICE 627477 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 156569 $75..00* 06/19/95 $45.00 UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA CONT ED /POLICE 060895 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 156570 $45.00* 06/19/95 $19.30 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 0520950 052095 INSPECTIONS ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $27.98 US WEST-CELLULAR TELEPHONE 156571 $47.28* 06/19/95 $250.65 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 ARENA BLDG /GRO GUNBRANGE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $40.67 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 061995 & TELEPHONE 06/19/95 06/19/95 $53.79 $55.66 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 061995 PUMP & LIFT ST VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $153.92 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 061995 DARE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $55.66 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/19/95 06/19/95 $3,572.22 $181.02 US US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 ART CENTER BLD SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $55.66 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 061995 061995 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $73.50 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSCOURS TELEPHONE 06/19/95 06/19/95 $750.27 $60.55 US WEST US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 POOL OPERATION TELEPH ON TELEPHONE 06/19/95 $117.54 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 061995 156572 $5,421.11* 06/19/95 $109.27 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE D0860860 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 156573 $109.27* 06/19/95 $267.26 USAQUATICS CHEMICALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 10277 10277 POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $1,075.00 USAQUATICS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10277 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 06/19/95 $2,325.00 USAQUATICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10277 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 06/19/95 $519.19 USAQUATICS 156574 $4,186.45* 06/19/95 $52.97 VAN O LITE INC ACCESSORIES 91599 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1659 156575 $52.97* 06/19/95 $1,513.90 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 068046 068073 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 1716 1716 06/19/95 $840.66 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS PAPER SUPPLIES 068050 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 06/19/95 $967.77 VAN PAPER CO. 156576 $3,322.33* 06/19/95 $55.00 VANDERMOLEN, TOM REFUND TENNIS 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156577 $55.00* 06/19/95 $375.20 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 13434 13445 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES CONTR REPAIRS 1961 06/19/95 $45.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONTRACTED REPAIRS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 Page 35 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 156578 $420.20* 06/19/95 $43.93 VIDEO DUPLICATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 10150 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 156579 $43.93* 06/19/95 $70.24 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 509671 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 1611 156580 $70.24* 06/19/95 $285.95 VOSS LIGHTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 257569 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1526 156581 $285.95* 06/19/95 $1,717.76 W.B. MILLER INC CONSTRUCTION 93 -3FNL STORM SEWER CIP 156582 $1,717.76* 06/19/95 $2,023.50 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 34186 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 1844 06/19/95 - $94.68 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIR PARTS C11845 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 156583 $1,928.82* 06/19/95 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 156584 $100.00* 06/19/95 $414.42 WATER PRO "PIPE 689634 GENERAL STORM PIPE 1667 06/19/95 $210.14 WATER PRO PIPE 688995 GENERAL STORM PIPE 1667 156585 $624.56* 06/19/95 $60.36 WEEKEND FREEDOM REPAIR PARTS 75913 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 1759 156586 $60.36* 06/19/95 $40.00 WERNESS, MARY REFUND SWIMMING 061295 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 156587 $40.00* 06/19/95 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 18 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 1892 06/19/95 $90.00 WERT, CAPRICE CLEANING 17 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 1891 156588 $180.00* 06/19/95 $428.25 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 95254145 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1670 06/19/95 $283.43 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 95252943 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1671 06/19/95 $443.59 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. TOOLS 95252943 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1627 06/19/95 $281.45 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ACCESSORIES 95252642 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1628 06/19/95 $347.39 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 95252240 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 1102 156589 $1,784.11* 06/19/95 $12.80 WESTLINK PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 050195 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 1661 156590 $12.80* 06/19/95 $4,666.00 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEN 47708 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIP REPLACEM 9482 156591 $4,666.00* 06/19/95 $50.51 WILLIAMS STEEL PAINT 62199101 PUMP & LIFT ST PAINT 1527 06/19/95 $34.74 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 62077901 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1418 Page 36 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 16 1995 00:23:19 VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -- NUM. -- CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT - -------- -------------- ---- ------ -- ---- - 1111 ------ ---------19-95----- --------- - --- $34.21 - ----------- - ------ - ----- WILLIAMS STEEL ---- --- GENERAL SUPPLIES 61985603 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 132 06/19/95 06/ 156592 $119.46* 06/19/95 $196.51 WILSON SPORTING GO ODS COST OF GOODS - PRO 95379500 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9036 156593 $196..51* 06/19/95 $13,342.75 WILSON'S NORTH WEST NU CONSTRUCTION 94 -5FNL STREET IMPROVE CIP 156594 $13,342.75* 06/19/95 $80.85 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD B W 1079 10696 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $161.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD W 10634 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $225.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 1080 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $53.90 WINE MERCHANTS 156595 $520.75* 06/19/95 $173.10 WINEBERG, DON MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 060595 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE 156596 $173.10* $75.00 WONDER WEAVERS SERVICES CL /EB 070195 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 06/19/95 156597 $75.00* MAGAZINE SUBCRIPTION 1951536 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES 06/19/95 $24.00 WORDPERFECT 156598 $24.00* $448.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44938 17263 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 06/19/95 $210.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W GOODS SOLD W 44937 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $637.75 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44871 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $71.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 17267 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $140.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 44936 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $126.60 WORLD CLASS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45079 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $680.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD W 45078 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 06/19/95 $347.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD B 45080 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 06/19/95 $159.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 156599 $2,822.30* WROBLESKI, HENRY POLICE SERVICES JUNE 199 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 06/19/95 $100.00 156600 $100.00* COST OF GOODS - PRO 118299 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1290 06/19/95 $234.45 YONEX CORPORATION 156601 $234.45* 06/19/95 $54.32 ZACK'S INCORPORATED GENERAL SUPPLIES 1133 1824 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1833 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1822 06/19/95 $79.50 ZACK'S INCORPORATED GENERAL SUPPLIES 156602 $133.82* GENERAL SUPPLIES 54181638 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 1887 06/19/95 $78.66 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 156603 $78.66* 06/19/95 $75.00 ZUHRAH TEMPLE GERMAN B SERVICES CL /EB 062895 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 156604 $75.00* $1,764,463.65* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Fri Jun 16 1995 00:25:55 Page 1 FUND # ----------------------------------------------- 10 GENERAL FUND $690,675.10 FUND # 11 C.D.B.G. $35.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATION $1,655.33 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL- $12,918.33 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $5,233.20 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL $12,738.37 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE $1732484.49 , FUND # 28 ICE ARENA $128,442.47 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE $101.47 FUND # 30 EDINB /CENT LAKES $21,453.46 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $42,505.98 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER $2,566.78' FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $66,294.25 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCT FUND $606,359.42 $1,764,463.65 ' COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 05/04/95 $15,000.00 PERA SETTLEMENT 05104145 CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS 154018 $15,000.00* 05/05/95 $297,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 050595. LIQUOR PROG CASH 05/05/95 - $297,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 0505 95 LIQUOR PROG CASH 154019 $.00* 05/08/95 $23,440.22 FIDELITY BANK FEDERAL PAYROLL TAXE 050595 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 154020 $23,440.22* 05/08/95 $476.20 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURA MAY PREMIUM 050595 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 154021 $476.20* 05/10/95 $29,930.64 PERA PERA 0505 95 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 154022 $29,930.64* 05/10/95 $19.62 PERA PERA 05 0595 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 154023 $19.62* 05/16/95 $200,000.00 HRA ADVANCE FUNDS 051595 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 154024 $200,000.00* 05/16/95 $6,013.88 UNISOURCE PAPER ABOUT TOWN 066992 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 154025 $6,013.88* 05/19/95 $170,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 051995 LIQUOR PROG CASH 05/19/95 - $170,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 0519 95 LIQUOR PROG CASH 154026 $.00* 05/22/95 $23,722.24 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 051995 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 154027 $23,722.24* 05/22/95 $30,222.50 PERA PERA 051995 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 154028 $30,222.50* 05/22/95 $19.62 PERA PERA 0522 95 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL 154029 $19.62* 05/22/95 $445.40 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURA BASIC LIFE 0519 95 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 154030 $445.40* 05/22/95 $16,961.24 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 052295 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 154031 $16,961.24* 05/08/95 $130.68 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 49535 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $130.68 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 49534 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $706.01 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50295 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $544.45 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50298 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $115.33 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50296 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $430.82 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 50297 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM OBJECT PO -NUM_- -------------------------------------------------------------- 155255 $2,057.97* 05/08/95 - $61.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 20360 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/08/95 - $165.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 20417 20358 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 - $15.02 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD W SOLD L 50405 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 05/08/95 $58.76 $2,223.67 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 50418 YORK SELLING CST OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 05/08/95 $1,168.47 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 50406 VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $2,051.46 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L SOLD L 50407 50410 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $801.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD M 50411 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/08/95 05/08/95 $119.10 $2,103.39 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 50412 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 05/08/95 $26.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOD L 50413 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $1,353.23 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOD L SOLD M 50416 50417 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/08/95 $182.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS 155256 $9,846.46* 05/08/95 $23.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3540879 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/08/95 $194.91 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567377 3567385 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $526.36 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 3567393 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $206.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3567401 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 05/08/95 $2,556.62 $319.39 JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567419 VERNON SELLING CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/08/95 $238.12 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567435 50TH ST SELLIN SELLIN CST CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $176.19 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 3567443 3567450 50TH ST 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $240.86 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD L 3567468 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $3,198.08 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567476 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $156.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567492 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 05/08/95 $380.99 $252.21 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3567500 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 05/08/95 -$8.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOD W 3539657 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU 05/08/95 $5,467.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOD L W 3567518 3567526 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $760.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 155258 $14,689.26* 05/08/95 $160.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 708008 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/08/95 $650.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 708016 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $160.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 708024 708032 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $160.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 714881 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 05/08/95 $291.79 $27.00 ED ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 714899 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF OF GDS MIX GD WINE 05/08/95 $339.21 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 714907 50TH ST SELLIN SELLIN CST CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $250.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 714915 714923 50TH ST 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $236.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 714931 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 05/08/95 $337.10 $133.00 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 714949 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE GD WINE 05/08/95 $103.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 714956 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $520.66 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 714964 714972 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $108.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST COST OF F GOODS SOLD W 714980 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $147.58 ED PHILLIPS 1. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT +,PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 05/08/95 - $11.96 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 0016543 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $452.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 714998 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $107.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715086 VERNON SELLING CST:OF GD WINE :••y° 05/08/95 $464.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715003 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $1,550.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 715011 YORK SELLING CST OF-GD -LIQU 05/08/95 $390.23 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715029 VERNON SELLING CST OF' -GD WINE 05/08/95 $378.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715037 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $170.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715045 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $569.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 715052 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD'WINE 05/08/95 $81.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 715060 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS-BEE 05/08/95 $515.44 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 715078 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155260 $8,295.95* 05/08/95 $795.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50408 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $39.30 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 50409 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/08/95 $914.11 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $719.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50414 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $19.87 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 50415 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155261 $2,487.74* 05/08/95 - $93.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 285077 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 - $117.47 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 285889 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $143.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 286893CO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/08/95 $2,180.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 286894 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $78.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 286894CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/08/95 $1,498.53 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 286895 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $2,462.24 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 286893 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/08/95 $152.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 286982 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/08/95 $5,451.78 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 287879 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $3,575.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 287262 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $189.49 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 287278 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $6,443.67 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 287288 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/08/95 $123.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 287614 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 155262 $22,088.97* 05/15/95 $605.98 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 51124 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $234.00 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 51206 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/15/95 $332.49 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 52901 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $974.51 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 52898 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $97.97 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 52899 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/15/95 $529.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 52900 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 155672 $2,774.45* 05/15/95 $85.98 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD M 53124 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/15/95 $1,895.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53125 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $1,755.53 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53123 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $60.47 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53126 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $2,355.09 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53132 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $633.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53127 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $1,284.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53128 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION --- ----- ----- -- --- INVOICE -- - - -- PROGRAM ---- OBJECT - - - - -- -------- PO- NUM. - _________ _ 05/15/95 --=------------------------------------- $80.04 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53131 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155673 $8,151.42* 05/15/95 $700.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3600897 VERNON SELLING CST OF CST OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/15/95 $4,887.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD L SOLD L 3600913 3600921 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $88.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. CO. COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3600939 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 05/15/95 $790.71 $29.46 JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3600947 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $266.48 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3600954 50TH ST SELLIN ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $1,357.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD L SOLD W 3600962 3600889 50TH VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $260.70 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD W 3600970 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $204.80 JOHNSON WINE WINE CO. CO. COST OF GOODS SOD W 3601044 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 05/15/95 $800.12 $288.29 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3600996 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $377.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3601002 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $120.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOD L SOD L 3601010 3601028 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $146.30 JOHNSON WINE WINE CO. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3601036 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $2,168.12 JOHNSON 155674 $12,487.56* 05/15/95 $204.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 710319 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $204.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 710327 736.48 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $273.30 ED PHILLIPS PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 736330 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/15/95 05/15/95 $37.00 $426.50 ED ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOD W 736355 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $105.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736363 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $232.35 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD L 736371 736389 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $566.72 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD W 736397 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $106.35 ED PHILLIPS PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 736405 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/15/95 05/15/95 $57.00 $276.31 ED ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736413 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $707.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736421 626945 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $423.30 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 736439 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $196.90 ED PHILLIPS PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 736546 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/15/95 05/15/95 $19.00 $666.85 ED ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOD W 736447 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/15/95 $149.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 736454 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $302.53 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD L SOLD M 736462 736470 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/15/95 $50.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736488 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 05/15/95 $553.71 $270.80 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736496 VERNON SELLING CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/15/95 $356.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOD W 736504 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $617.10 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOD W SOD W 736512 736520 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $1,063.72 ED PHILLIPS & SONS SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 736538 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $242.35 ED PHILLIPS & 155676 $8,110.39* 05/15/95 $115.63 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOD W 52421 VERNON SELLING CST SELLING OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $801.82 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD W GOODS SOLD W 52422 52423 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $523.76 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 05/15/95 $742.87 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 52425 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $19.87 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD L 52426 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $53.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 52424 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $127.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 53030 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $41.58 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 53129 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 ..$63.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 53031 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $191.71 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 53032 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $127.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 53033 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155677 $2,810.17* 05/15/95 -$5.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 286592 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 - $70.51 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 287421 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $1,182.89 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 288341 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $53.85 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 288341CO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/15/95 $779.37 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 288342 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $170.18 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 286384 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $2,002.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 288501 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $95.81 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 289497 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/15/95 $161.10 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD B 288501CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/15/95 $3,966.28 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 289168 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $5,002.34 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 289170 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/15/95 $1,621.83 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 289171 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 155.678 $14,960.44* 05/22/95 $149.89 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55483 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $538.06 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55484 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $118.80 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55532 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $342.44 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55482 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $102.96 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55533 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $543.01 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55537 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $703.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55534 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $25.79 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55535 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $148.95 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55536 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 155682 $2,673.05* 05/22/95 $192.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 54829 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $1,227.85 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55603 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $1,028.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55604 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $955.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 53130 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $408.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55605 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $1,430.99 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55608 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $667.18 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55606 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $1,949.27 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 55607 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155683 $7,860.97* 05/22/95 $932.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3634045 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $2,758.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3634052 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $770.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3634060 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $850.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3634086 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $1,698.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3434110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- PROGRAM -- - - - OBJECT - -- PO NUM. _ 05/22/95 $120.43 ------------------------------------- JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3634094 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF GD WINE OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $886.73 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 3634177 3634102 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 05/22/95 $57.59 $305.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD W 3634128 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $559.68 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3634136 YORK SELLING SELLING CST CST OF GD OF GD WINE WINE 05/22/95 $469.67 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD L 3634151 3634169 YORK YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $4,277.49 JOHNSON WINE CO. 155684 $13,687.41* 05/22/95 - $42.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 731943 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 -$4.46 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 738302 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 - $38.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 731935 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 -$7.74 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 738328 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $125.10 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 762609 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $299.63 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 748418 YORK SELLING CST OF GD GD LIQU WINE 05/22/95 $183.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757237 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF 05/22/95 $369.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757245 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/22/95 $92.12 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD L SOLD L 757252 757260 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 05/22/95 $416.06 $593.67 ED PHILLIPS & SONS ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD W 757278 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $769.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757286 YORK SELLING CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/22/95 $1,328.44 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L SOLD W 757310 757328 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $382.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS PHILLIPS & SONS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W 757336 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 05/22/95 $484.84 $1,079.20 ED ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757344 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $459.45 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757351 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 05/22/95 $266.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 757369 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD 155686 $6,757.11* 05/22/95 $867.31 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 54941 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $63.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 54942 50TH ST SELLIN SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/22/95 $458.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD M 54943 55486 50TH ST YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/22/95 05/22/95 $94.05 $830.69 PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 55485 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155687 $2,314.41* 05/22/95 - $250.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 289976 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/22/95 -$6.42 QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD W 289987 290545 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 05/22/95 $1,313.13 $32.64 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 290545CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/22/95 $1,222.47 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 290569 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD GD WINE WINE 05/22/95 $48.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD B 290569 290569 -C 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GDS BEE 05/22/95 05/22/95 $233.45 - $58.80 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD L 289960 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $898.85 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD W SOLD L 290809 291588 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/22/95 05/22/95 $550.18 $61.85 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD B 290809CO YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/22/95 - $82.58 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 291142 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/22/95 $1,998.68 QUALITY WINE COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD L SOLD L 291157 291158 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $1,466.97 QUALITY WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 05/22/95 $1,466.97 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 291259 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/22/95 $296.06 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 291579 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155689 $9,191.93* 05/30/95 $570.31 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58169 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $1,464.90 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58165 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $169.55 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD M 58170 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/30/95 $328.68 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58176 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $822.74 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58175 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155693 $3,356.18* 05/30/95 - $13.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 21316 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 -$7.04 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 21325 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 -$9.81 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 21360 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $313.95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 56747 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $156.98 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 56748 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,442.74 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58166 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,894.13 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58168 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 - $20.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 21312 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $689.63 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58171 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $553.11 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58865 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $2,237.74 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58173 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $26.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58174 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,129.85 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58177 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $2,848.58 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 58178 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155694 $11,242.89* 05/30/95 -$7.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3606712 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 -$4.94 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3644705 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $1,745.42 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665577 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $206.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665585 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $4,602.18 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3665593 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $642.06 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665601 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $312.94 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665627 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $120.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665635 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $1,656.06 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3665643 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $374.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665650 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $738.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665676 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $415.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665684 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $120.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665692 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 -$3.03 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3606704 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $77.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665700 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $877.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD W 3665726 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $5,023.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD L 3665718 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 155696 $16,897.56* 05/30/95 -$6.35 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 744094 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 - $60.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 747675 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $18.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD B 753533 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/30/95 $319.28 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 757377 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 Page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM ---- - - OBJECT - - -- -- - - - -PO -NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 05/30/95 - $215.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 744086 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 -$3.68 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 765685 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $267.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780619 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $54.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 777029 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $54.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 777037 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $463.11 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780585 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $689.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780593 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $238.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780601 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $37.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD M 780643 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/30/95 $160.35 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780635 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $367.99 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 780627 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $620.87 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 780700 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $588.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780668 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $193.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780684 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $781.60 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780692 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $415.94 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780650 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $412.65 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780718 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $916.53 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 780726 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $339.21 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780734 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $755.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780748 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $389.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780759 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $826.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780767 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $377.33 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 780775 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $1,003.33 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD L 780783 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $168.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD W 793158 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155698 $10,172.16* 05/30/95 $1,197.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58179 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $63.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58172 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $92.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD M 58180 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/30/95 $127.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 58167 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $32.67 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 57536 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $682.50 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 57537 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $1,078.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD W 57535 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155699 $3,274.85* 05/30/95 $16.16 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 293058 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $3,452.92 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 293166 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,978.74 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 293167 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $131.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 293199 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $5,479.46 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 293203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,962.35 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 292353 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 $899.18 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 292354 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/30/95 - $168.32 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 292501 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 - $204.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD L 292575 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/30/95 $1,357.68 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD W 292866 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 155700 $14,906.12* $557,346.98 `COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:54:43 "r Page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM.' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --,p�.:. ids COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS Wed Jun 7 1995 23:58:48 Page 1 ------------------------- !., ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $340,237.68 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATION $6,013.88 FUND # 50 LIQUOR FUND $211,095.42 $557,346.98 a June 15, 1995 City of Edina Planning Dept. 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Re: June 19, 1995 City Council Meeting Case File: S -95 -2 5000 Blake Road Dear City of Edina Planning Department /Edina City Council: It is the understanding of the undersigned property. owners on Scriver Road that the Groves /Stickney Limited Company has a proposed development at 5000 Blake Road. As a result of meetings with Groves /Stickney Limited Company on May 21, 1995, and with the Edina Planning Commission on May 31, 1995, it is our further under- standing that the proposed development does not include an extension of Scriver Road or to make Scriver Road a through street. Rather, it is our understanding that the proposed development has an ingress and egress at 5000 Blake Road, into a dead end cul -de- sac. Obvious=ly, the fact that this development does not include a proposal to extend Scriver Road or make it a through street, is favorable for the Scriver Road. residents and in our best interests. However, the property owners of Scriver Road would like to make a request on the-City of Edina if this. proposed development is passed. We would request -J that the curbing at the end of the Scriver Road deadend cul= de`sac be finished off, much in the same fashion that the—other nearby deadend cul -de -sacs have been finished off with curbing throughout the cul -de=sac. At present, the curbing is .not completed and"' here is no curbing in front of 5021 Scriver Road or, 5020 Scriver Road. 'Therefore, if this development is approved as proposed and initially approved by City of Edina Planning Dept. June 15, 1995 Page 2 the Edina Planning Commission, we would simply request that the curbing be finished off.and completed on Scriver Road. Very truly yours, uu Roberta a Bess 7oni 5021 Scr o \___- -<--- Steven and BarbarafWlmore 5025 Scriver Road Ronald and Nikki Lewis 5101 Scriver Road 4m4edlsAn�d& Mari n Mahoney 8 Blake Road 19ilte Michael and Susan - 5 -111 Scriver Road A Q Iw bert'tiand Karen Ne 1.7 S river Road Douglas ,And\,Lida inder 5108 Scriver R d"L R y nd Kathy Jensen 5124 Blake Road City of Edina Planning Dept. June 15, 1995 Page 3 49444_1 Nanty J a and Steve_ Bruce -5112 Scriver Road Nancy Jim Bishop 511 Sc iver Road gonald and Lisa Beaupr,�/ 5020 Scriver Road Mr. and Mrs. Philip Smith 5024 Scriver Road DORIS F. CLEGO 7250 LEWIS RIDGE PARKWAY, UM 110 EDIRA, IVRRRESOTA 55430 June 2, 1995 To the City Council of the City of Edina I am writing regarding the upcoming vote on a proposed soccer field at Lewis Park on June 19, 1995. The Lewis Ridge Condominium Association Board of Directors has decided not to take a position on this issue, but has encouraged the residents to write individual letters in answer to the individual letters they received from the Edina Park Board. I believe this issue has been very much misunderstood by the neighbors of Lewis Park. I, for one, believed that there would be no skating rink other than the hockey rink and that the park would lose its diversity with too many soccer fields, if the third soccer field was allowed. I understand from the Parks Department that there will still be a skating rink on the north side of the warming house to provide the park with diverse facilities. As I understand it now, the park would consist of soccer fields for all ages, football for all ages, playground equipment, a hockey rink and a skating rink for winter sport for the children, as well as a walking path and a tennis court for the seniors in the area As a citizen of Edina, I would be proud of such a diverse park. I think it is making the best use of very valuable land. I am assured that Lewis Ridge Condominium Board of Directors will take appropriate action to prohibit parking on our private driveway. It would be much appreciated if the Park Board would help with proper parking by including such information in the packets given to parents and coaches. I would support a child's soccer field at Lewis Park because I am quite aware that they are badly in need of a grassy field in which to play. Tax money was spent to provide exotic new playground equipment in the park while the young soccer players must play elsewhere on a dirt field. The large flooded skating rink is expensive to maintain, and in a warm winter sits as a stagnant body of water much of the time which is unattractive. It is also used by many people who do not live in Edina because it is one of the largest areas around on which to skate. A well kept grassy field would be a welcome addition. c: Mr. John Keprios Director, Edina Park System Sincerely, Doris F. Clegg �r Whereas: �� dina is known for Winter Sports Excellence U"Pur Families want winter activities available. l Y, he soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call Jor eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. W /Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility ❑ I do not want increased oise and traffic. Ll 4LL Jir j I ask Edina City Council to reject the p k board's ptoposal to eliminate the Bi Ri at is k. Signed_ Name Address rvaU Phone _ if 9 39 Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence lour Families want winter activities available. U The soccer Field is redundant. 21 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ �iul� , I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board' proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed G Name Addres Phone Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for - Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter.Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's-,most used winter facility. ased noise and traffic. 1>77 I ask Edina i Founcil a park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed -r 'MO-1 k.0— Name Address 5'11 Phone May 7. 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Mina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned relents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large tang rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field The park and rink as it exists today is well used. Aot j�6v hockey players, but by neighborhood families. who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evening* and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, NW2,P95. May 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Edina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned residents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large bandy /skating rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field The park and rink as it exists today is well used not just by hockey players, but by neighborhood families, who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evenings, and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, May 9, 1995. .� . 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. rJ Mav 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Community input regarding Edina Soccer Association Proposal We the undersigned residents of Edina are opposed to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal to change the large bandy /skating rink at Lewis Park into a soccer field. The park and rink as it exists today is well used not just by hockey players, but by neighborhood families. who are in favor of the park's status quo. We also oppose the large crowds which would be drawn to the soccer fields during summer evenings, and subsequent parking problems and neighborhood disruptions. We ask you to vote NO to the Edina Soccer Association's proposal on Tuesday, May 9, 1995. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. • 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy. Edina, Mn. 55439 May 5, 1995 Director of Edina Parks & Recreation Dept. Dear Sir: Am writing to you in regards to the letter we received about developing a soccer field at Lewis Park. We do not approve of the development of a soccer field of this magnitude for the following reasons. We have lived at Lewis Ridge for almost five years and enjoy our daily walk for our health as do many older people in all the condos & townhomes from 70th & Cahill to 78th & Cahill. This area is populated with Senior Citizens and taxed heavily. At present we have toddlers in the playground equipment and will have more activity when your new equipment arrives. A few organized games and the ice skating in the winter we do not object too. We have some roller bladers and teen agers on bicycles who could be more careful and need more rules. People at the practice games are using our private driveway, which is a fire lane for parking and watching. Tournaments would bring young people from all areas. The field is only available from two sides. Too much confusion in a Senior area. We would like to see the walking paths improved. They all slope one way or the other. Dangerous to rollerbladers and to walkers. We object to a soccer field and hope you can find a more suitable place which has more parking available, restrooms and police detail. Sincerely, 6aw4wo- 'Z� Clarence Guldberg Gweth Guldberg KARL E. SAMDT, M. D. 17a MEI,1 AL ARTS MI NE POLIS. INNESOTN[� TEL PF40NEe X532$ Q��, 6af -,� ' %( /.• 'yam' � �`�� 91-6u,7 t Dr/ • i �/�—G �Gf/ GL.L�I� C.2G�- vl/yLG� ��2G y-��i� G��GZ•fil2. c�� a (� ze G' WestPhe�Ddo Edna. Wd 5"M USA rA 4 LeCHATAIGNIER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 7200 Cahill Rd, Edina, MN 55439 May 3, 1995. John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept. 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Your letter of April 17th, 1995 (received April 28th) We,the residents of LeChataignier Condominimums, object to the proposal before the Council to develop Lewis Park bandy/ skating rink to a soccer field. We appreciate the Park and the winter activities of ice skating, bandy /games and use by families with young children during the winter months. Our windows are naturally closed during the winter months when there is no nuisance value, however, the summer months would be a disaster to all resi- dents with the increased traffic and noise levels. We hope the above clearly states o= ;views. o �fa� �r�n.�x" 3o`I 4� , 1�f W� Sincerely a Gayle asford, President 11_- v j0-�- 9M gl"�. 1&-a- a-K, - -IQ1 p.t , W 0 G.vl�c,��/ o � '3o� loq V; X01 goy zoo s � Ile I� LE CHATAIGNIER July 1, 1994 Unit # Garage Stall # Name Telephone No. 100 9& 17 Ken & Majel Miller 941 -6497 101 39 & 40 Ray & Arvis Gustafson 942 -0468 102 23 Evelyn "Gigi" Olsen 829 -0642 Work 831 -1177 103 29 & 30 Glenn & Donna McDonnell 941 -6821 104 28 Les & Lea Nelson 829 -5531 105 21 Jon B. Arnason 944 -1601 106 18 & 20 Al & Amy Woods 944 -8208 107 5 Neil & Jean Lossing 944 -6293 108 1 & 13 Leda Bausman 941 -6498 109 7&8 Don & Mae Rand 944 -0584 110 10 & 44 Glen & Jo Omestad 942 -0327 200 3&4 Eleanor Mass 941 -3019 201 16 Eric & Carol Sundquist 829 -1909 202 24 Bill Yaeger_ 942 -5568 203 22 Stan & Jan Thomas 942 -0297 204 47 Marion Rasmuson 829 -1801 205 19 Ed & Clara Izmirian 941 -3642 206 37 Dick Dahlstrom 941 -6276 207 35 & 36 Audrey Blackbourn 944 -9608 208 41 & 42 Gale & Darlene Basford 9447790 209 45 Dan & Florence Liemandt 946 -1469 210 48 Larry & Jinny Payne 941 -4640 300 15 Marian Sorem 944 -0068 301 11 & 12 Doug & Bernice Beach 941 -8528 302 26 Stan & Sharon Chauss 947 -0875 303 31 & 32 Gyda Bailey 941 -4435 304 25 Dick & May Bartley 941 -8270 305 33 Ken & Dorothy Kohn 944 -5308 306 43 Janis Propper 944 -0431 307 38 Melva (Mel) Howard 941 -6318 308 6 Betty (Margaret) Adams 944 -7478 309 34 & 46 Jerry & Joey Gruggen 944 -8200 310 2& 14 Gilbert & Lois Falk 941 -2240 Pat Sundberg 938 -5549 Z 14 suc ! 4�9-6-4144, u, °�ssa s713 �h Vr 01` ash MNSf439WL1813 sc)ctz-"\ I /� June 12, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council Members, I am writing to you to express my interest in developing the Lewis Park area to facilitate the U -6 Soccer Program. I have recently moved to Edina from Minneapolis, and have been very pleased with my child's participation in this program. I feel that it is important for area parks to become more usable for more members of the community. Developing this park area into soccer fields would accomplish such a goal, and would provide many youngsters an opportunity to participate in a very worthwhile activity. Thank you. Sincerely, Syd Taggart 5017 Windsor Ave. Edina A - t C-', 7250 Leuiij Rid,,e Paz4my ,#205 Cdina, A'unne4otn 55439 e� 81 1995 The Edina City Council Edina Ci4 #aU C".. minne4o#a 55424 Deal Council P1-,mbe u: iPe aire waning to expAe44 oua view tepading the veer of $40, 000.00 �w- m a p ovate douAce to ufxg,,ade a docceA Ae, d in, Lezvi4 parch. R i4 out unde/t4tanding the oA6eA i.nvo. vee developing a third doccet Ae.ld, uAi.ch wu. d fire p lace a d/w." Link nonmo l lg enjoyed by young and o.ld. ThiA appealw to be a htO4 que otwna6.le p�an u.Jien, im aoccet AZe.ldo acre -,l wady avai labAwzd crr i.ldten avu- d them6 y be depti.ved of a 416ting tinh. Thetis acre other inn a i.ca&ona. Acceptance of these Aind d might open doou Pt other venbmeo uA ch u vu. d Awddeti cvnmetcirr Lp out pa4h and tieetuci i.ta ade to moire oAgani pd ac&vi ti e4. - ,46 Ae4.ident7 of A" peaceAd a zea, use acre anx iorvd about the pw6abiL -icy of .i.n Aeaded .jpec&&,% vroudc; pwUemo of .in.c/reaoed .6=a i.c and pemone pwr/ung in pa i,.vaie d v-ve o; and no 4e, L:i&t and .lack of 4ani oiav Ad-&- tireo. Xe .ditona uVe council mem6eu to ae ject this $40, 000.00 o #" Ne .Goole fomnzd uri th .intete4t tv gout conw.ideAaiion of the mai" V bwi-y coo , D,u and Aura. I?ua oe-U Linadqua a",t, ZU o/1,0, �! (2 .) ,2 o it, 6941 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 June 12, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Members of the Edina City Council, We are the parents of three soccer players. Our family has been served well by the Edina Soccer Association. The program is in need of more playing facilities. Lewis Park would be a outstanding addition. Please vote to add Lewis Park to the areas used by the Edina Soccer Association. Thank you. Sincerely, —¢ `-- Ruth and Bill Gough June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: SOCCER FIELD AT LEWIS PARK Dear Mr. Richards, Please consider a "YES" vote for the Soccer Association. On June 19th you will be discussing the new soccer field at Lewis Park. As a longtime participant in the Edina Soccer Association, I feel -the new field will be a great addition. It is a growing sport and it's important that Edina kids continue to have the opportunities in this sport. Thank you, �) , UV Carrie Wikman cw June 14, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council: Recently, I received a letter from the Edina Soccer Association asking for my support of a proposal to eliminate the Lewis Park Bandy Rink in favor of another soccer field in the city. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL. My family enjoys the Lewis Park Rink all winter long. I do not want to see it replaced by another soccer field. We also enjoy this space in the summer. It is used for kite flying and unorganized sports. It is not in that bad of shape. It can be used in the summer and fall for activities- -even for U -6 soccer. I am concerned that a special interest group is trying to promote their idea with out regard to the communities interests. I look to you, the city council, to thoroughly review this issue and to do what is best for the entire community and the neighborhoods affected by this decision. Sincerl /y, Ann Kramer Parent of U -6 &U -8 Soccer Players JoAnn Kramer 7305 Gleason Road Edina MN 55439 6916 Cornelia Dr. Edina, MN 55435 June 14, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I am writing to ask your support in approving the upcoming proposal to add an additional soccer field at Lewis Park. Although this action would require a change from the existing use as a bandy rink, an additional soccer field would serve many more residents of Edina. This field would be used to support Edina youth soccer in the spring, summer and fall; not just in the winter as it is currently used. Since Edina has very limited public space to expand to accomodate growing programs such as youth soccer, it is essential that what is available be used most effectively. My daughter has enjoyed playing on Edina traveling soccer teams for the past six years. It is a great program but I am impressed by the soccer facilities that suburban communities such as Eagan, Apple Valley, Eden Prairie, Plymouth, Rosemount, and Minnetonka are able to provide for their children. I appreciate the Council's thoughtful consideration of this matter on June 19, 1995. Sincerely, ,?Jon D. Erwin /1,9 171 s et lej S!' c L c ta: s • e o. .c S c .. J, 14-,t 4 r-..i c Itaej"fir : .� •Q- .•.,ate —r7/ vv --JA A-Z /-U-� -C 4A. •/,C!- �V� I`,' MM G Rose Gebo 5733 Drew Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 -2349 June 14, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall Edina, MN. 5.5424 Dear Sirs: I understand that you are in the process of making a decision to add a soccer field at Lewis Park. I am in favor of the new field because sports keep kids off the streets and out of trouble. Because the location is currently being used as a park and is a natural spot to further develop keeping city costs down to a minimum. And because the facilities would be used during reasonable hours not causing disruption to the neighbors. I am a fervent believer that Edina has less trouble with youth- generated crime partly because we keep our kids busy with sports and park activities. Let's not stop now. Sincerely, Rose Gebo June 15, 1995 Bruce Baird 5900 Long Brake Trail Edina, Mn 55439 941 -4916 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn 55424 Dear Mayor Richards, I have received the attached information about closinq the Lewis Park "open skating" area. MY FAMILY AGREES THIS SKATING AREA SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED FOR MORE SOCCER! It is nice to have a large skating area, not confined to the size of an official rink. Our neighborhood has already lost 2 tennis courts on Gleason Road, not replaced with anything for the neighborhood. In addition, the Lewis Park tennis courts need resurfacing. Regards, Bruce Baird 0 i 1 - ., i, 9dy,, t� � ! :f r nta.i riRi °S: x� c .. �• r4 0 l i The Edina Soccer Association has proposed_ to: create a °,�„poccer complex ", p "� x �. . _-fv..x atj4�,1r,h!Ytii .! aS' at Lewis Park. This would. elimin the large.sheet of ice�also lmowo:as the,bandy ,r, •..i, c; { +n:1 ri `,''^.f'.4NoiC rq :.ia?4�.a•!'.> ��'. _ '•! The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for,this. th .end f eld, contwgent p 0s, S UT �fi upon passage of their proposal in its present form; which precludes, other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the.city %of Edina where the b skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. x. The present plan would. leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very y= small recreational rink. 4 This proposal proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May.and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a•year- round, multi-use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex'.'. {' . Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of . our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? . It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Hyou do not want to seethe creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920 -0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! June 14,1995 Dear City Council Members, We appreciate the opportunity to include information about the history of our proposal and some other facts about soccer related to our proposal for Lewis Park. We look forward to working with the City of Edina to improve not only soccer fields, but other facilities at our Edina parks. Thank you for your consideration. Edina Soccer Association Board Patti Kelly, President 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 HISTORY OF LEWIS PARK PROPOSAL In 1993 Edina Soccer Association began discussions of moving the U -6 program to another site. The principle reason for this is the constant poor condition of the field at Weber Park. Because the field is flooded for skating in winter, there is no grass only weeds and dirt. In dry conditions the field is very dusty. In rainy and wet conditions, it is often muddy and under water. These conditions make it difficult for the young 5 and 6 year olds to run or control a soccer ball. Over these three years the U -6 program has grown from about 360 to 435 participants. In 1994 we began seriously looking at other options for this program, not only because of field conditions but also because of limited parking facilities at Weber Park. In fall 1994 a committee made up of Patti Kelly and Julie Turnbull met with Ed MacHolda from Park and Rec to set up criteria for a new soccer location for U -6 and possibly the U -8 programs. We decided on the following criteria: adequate bathroom facilities, adequate parking facilities, playground equipment (since many in these programs have other young children) and a park large enough to handle these programs. In fall of 1994 and winter of 1995 Patti Kelly, ESA President and Ed MacHolda, Park and Rec toured all of the parks in Edina to look for suitable sites for adding soccer fields. The best choice was Lewis Park, since it had all the criteria and there was an existing large field not in use (the bandy rink). In February 1995, ESA board voted to approve spending up to $30,000. to make improvements to Lewis Park, with the agreement that Park and Rec would move the bandy program. The original proposal was submitted to John Keprios on February 13, 1995. (see attachment #1) In April 1995, ESA presented its proposal to the Edina Park Board. Some of the concerns of the Park Board were as follows: -Added traffic to the area - Losing a sheet of ice (bandy rink) - Number of participants in our program - Feasibility of grading and putting in new irrigation In answer to these concerns, ESA sent a letter to all Park Board members addressing these concerns. (See attachment #2) In April 1995, City of Edina engineer, Don Johnson completed a parking lot study of Lewis Park. His study shows there are a total of 106 parking spaces at Lewis Park. He and his staff also completed an estimate to regrade, add fill and topsoil to the bandy area. His estimate is $23, 280. In May 1995, Edina Park Board voted 6 -5 to accept Edina Soccer Associations proposal for Lewis Park. i Important considerations for Lewis Park proposal -The U -6 soccer program runs Monday through Thursday evenings 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. May 22 through July 21. The rest of the summer the one additional field at Lewis could be used for practices for traveling soccer teams. The existing two soccer fields at Lewis Park are currently used by the traveling program for games and practices, mainly in the evening. In fall, the fields at Lewis Park could be used for recreational football. - Edina Soccer Association has committed $30,000. plus an additional approximately $10,000. to make improvements to city soccer fields in Edina. ESA programs depend on both city and school district fields. In 1994, we requested to use the field between Southview School and Edina Community Center for the U -8 program and were turned down by the school district. Instead the U -8 program was located on one of the upper fields at Edina High School and is currently located there. Officials at the high school were reluctant to let ESA use these fields. - Currently there are two full time city employees required to flood the bandy rink (due to its large size). Every other skating facility in Edina requires two employees to flood three sites on a rotational basis. Due to recent budget cuts, the skating facilities at both Todd and Strachauer Parks were dropped. If put on the same rotation as the other 9 skating sites, Strachauer and Todd parks could be reopened. -Both the hockey and general skating rinks will remain at Lewis Park. Larger general skating areas located at Creek Valley School and Centennial Lakes are very convenient to the Lewis Park neighborhood. -The maximum number of cars counted this season at Weber Park for the U -6 program has been 65. The parking lot on the east end of Lewis Park holds 72 cars, which is more than adequate. FAEGRE & BENSON PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 2200 NORWEST CENTER, 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3901 TELEPHONE 612- 336 -3000 FACSIMILE 612 -336 -3026 KENNETH A. LIEBMAN 612/336 -3499 June 15, 1995 liebman @aol.com BY TELECOPY and U.S. MAIL Edina City Council c/o The Honorable Frederick Richards Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mayor Richards and Council Members: I am writing to you with respect to the proposal to convert the "Big Rink" at Lewis Park into a soccer field. My family lives in Edina-on Stonewood Court, approximately one mile from Lewis Park. We have one child in the U -6 soccer program, who plays his games at Weber Field. We also have two younger children who will also participate in this excellent program. During the winter, we frequently use the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Because of its size, we find it the best available location, indoor or out, for free skating. The Big Rink is an exceptional facility and a unique local asset. I strongly oppose converting the Big Rink into an additional soccer field. Finally, has the Park Board or the ESA studied the feasibility and cost of providing the drainage which would permit the Big Rink to be used as a soccer field during the late spring and summer? Very truly yours, �n Kenneth A. Liebman KAL:jsn MLL28C66.WP5 Minneapolis Denver Des Moines Washington, D.C. London Frankfurt Moscow Abnaty June 14, 1995 Dear Council Members: Wouldn't it be too bad to reduce multi -use park land to single use, single season usage? It seems to me that Lewis Park currently serves multiple constituencies - neighborhood, skaters, hockey players, bandy players, community, soccer players, walkers, etc. The proposal eliminates many of these and doesn't add value. Why does this make sense? On what basis can we justify such a dedication? Please don't limit the options on park land that has proven multi- season use. Respectfully, The Youngbloods 7,205 Lanham Lane -£dins 'Y7 AtAk-1 � k. -tT j 1�47 Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excelle ❑ Our Families want winter activities availabl ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't c for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter faci ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. Li I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. signed Nam Addims . your 7 coup-off. today to voice. your. opinion. i, - =ft fil an Oft cud: .hem!/ _� f�. Y 9r � _ A__'..,t ; 6, _ � _ .T / -. .!. •... ., _ o Ml�sr "wE�'TT!N1k MAYOR EREDEnICK RICH1qR03 923 -7373, - y. PEGGY KELLY � 's -0687 - - - -- a - - DENNI s- �NAETZOLsD --�20, 925 -8765 rf%ULVS e_ 924 -8776 f - SMITH 831 -9400 .GLENN =ft fil an Oft cud: .hem!/ _� f�. Y 9r � _ A__'..,t ; 6, _ � _ .T / -. .!. •... ., _ o Ml�sr "wE�'TT!N1k Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. 1 ask Edina City Council t e ect the ark oar s proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Whereas: J. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence CA Our Families want winter activities available. Jd The soccer Field is redundant. 16 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility, l� 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. t �(t PPS Ph�'Y�N C ask Edina City Coun "ito4r ect tiie p r "boar 's proposa to eliminate Big Rink • is Park. Signed Name Address Phone! - -- - - -- -- - -- Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ ur Families want winter activities available. LY The soccer Field is redundant. YEdina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. � wis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not w t increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council o reje— a park board's sa4 to eliminate Big Rinkat is Park. Name W t l— . 7 A S S Address COO, klx—t WV Phone Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. �he soccer Field is.redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call fi r eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ I ask Edina City Council to reject the park boar sal to elimina • ie Big R' k at wis Park. Signe t� Name Address Phone ` 1�// -&-711 Whereas: —4 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. . 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. �sk Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate t Pj Big Rink at, wis Park. Signed - ���,i Name_ Q.' Address --,-f ��r�s.►� Phone 9'/1- 4 ' Whereas: )1 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence 14 Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. f Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to. reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. . Signed /41V 4; �C -, Q i QQc.✓ Name_ Address -7 a-oo CaA, Phone_ lW --6 If '?7 U Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellenc Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facilit, 1,$ 1 do nqt want increased noise and traffic. IR ms �j�,� a-1-4 I ask Edina ity ouncil to reject the park oard's proposal to eliminate t e Big Rink Lewis ark. , Signed 4 1 A4JU Name Address U Phone �� �l —/3 - -- Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. >� Our families want winter activities available. ri The soccer Field is redundant. . Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call 1 for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. we- C.o,' + 0 Fforc? -Tb 1OSG Gtir'� Y`,C�i� w ice— tn I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed 17 Name ,�,�;.c C o��• Address 5740 �eeanr � IT ,_ 5'7 Phone1.� - Where as: &f Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. VOur Families want winter activities available. UY The soccer Field is redundant. L� Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Off Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. W I do not want increased noise and traffic. El I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Ri0k at Lewis P k. Signed Name o L Address 7 p? Do C A t// 1_ L R ,n Phone r 9! — / 9 c> 9 Where as: Cd Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 0 Our Families want winter activities available. Vf The soccer Field is redundant. f7' Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. UI do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at ewis Palk. Signed � C? . /. . Name K v f-rt# C o ft,v Address _74o a c LL 9 1* 3� a Phone 944 – 6'3p & Where as: 9K Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lew' Park. Signed a-ati Name _ _ I% Address _7 A o 0 CA 41 L L R -D cA 0 o— Phone X l} / – 3 o ) 9 Where as: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. �El The soccer Field is redundant. C Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. 0 I ask Edina City Council to reject the ark board's proposal to eliminate the Big ' t Lewis a Signedr C) Name_ Addref 'Vgr9w WJ=e Adams _ `f Phone 7200 CehX Road 9308 7 7 Edina, MN SS439 �_ } Whereas: ❑ El ❑ I ask Edina Cit y eliminate the Bi tPOP6, Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. \, The soccer Field is redundant. �pp Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call C for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility% I do not want increased noise and t affic. A Council to reject the p,4k fioard's proposal to a Rink at Lewis P Where as: Jiff. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. "'A Our Families want winter activities available. ;W The soccer Field is redundant. ,VD Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. .. +. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis NY. Signed z- Name AL4 s d Address ' v 6 Phone ^ G u Where as: Ef Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. VOur Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call 0�for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City C ncil to reject the ,,,�park board's proposal to eliminate the Big at LowiscFarlU, , N Where as: Rr ,Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ur Families want winter activities available. f The soccer Field is redundant. O"*'Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call ( tr eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. C�' I do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ t1fn r�4, Xo 01,10a I ask Edina City ounciC % reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Bi g at Lewis ark Signed SlagW,.c� Name Address `� *2.0 O 0-04,-U Phone 9 a f- C,25 l$ Whereas: 13 Edina is known for Winter Spurts Excellence. U Our Families want winter activities available. f� The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. a Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed _ Name - - Address Phone Is known for Winter Spurts Excellence. Whereas: Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. /l dina has three other sites which wouldn't call ing a Winter Sports Facility. fur urinat s Park is Edina's most dand traffi citify. �do not want increased noise 1 ask Edina Cit y Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at wr ark. Signe Name L _N er Address �-'� `� Phone - 2 Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. LT-Our Families want winter activities available. LU'The soccer Field is redundant. U -Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ('Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name /V•��G rT� G c_r�.yG Address 7Ta � 4 • ��l �D Phone Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑/Our Families want winter activities available. U"T"he soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used facility. i/,, /Uo' I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject 'he park board's proposal to eliminate t e Big Rink 4- Par . Signed Name Address � - Phone —0 y-I - / 3 4, 11� t Q Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Whereas: U Our Families want winter activities available. ;D . The soccer Field is redundant. O 15 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call 0 for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 0 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. M I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate a 13ig Rink at Lewis P Signe ✓' rE' Name t/ Address L� Phone may/ Where as: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. Wf The soccer Field is redundant. 5d Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. J4 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 6 I do not want increased noise and traffic. LI I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the BTk Lew' Sign Name Address o o o Phone ,ri,�,i/ — 2 76 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. U Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. EI I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lew Pa • . Signed _;, ir�7 Name Address ' 2 0 0 3 i 0 Phone n"/— .2- 2-y o Where as: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. f� Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 0 I do not want increased noise and traffic. LI I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rin t ' -Pa Signed ..�i Name T�-'��vG l� Address 72-00 t Aw , L L ie _-zo 3 Phone 2- 9 7 KARL F. DIESSNER Attorney -at -Law Yorktown Office Court, Suite 159 7101 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Tel. (612) 921 -4944 June 16, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Edina Soccer Association's Proposal Dear Mayor and Council Members: G-) C) � L� -::) � - .. -) FAX (612) 921 -3299 Please be advised that I reside in the Dewey Hill Condominium located at 5601 Dewey Hill Road and hence received the form letter of John Keprios dated May 24, 1995 relative to the proposal to develop Lewis Park Bandy /Skating Rink into a soccer field. I was shocked when I read the letter of the President of our Association addressed to you advising of the large majority of the Condominium owners who were opposed to such a development. This is particularly true that in view of the fact that in all probability, not more than 25% of the Condominium owners can see the Park and any anticipated noise would be negligible. In any event, I cannot think of any greater usage of rarely used property than providing recreational facilities for our youth. Therefore, even though I have no children nor grandchildren who would be using the facilities after the development, I strongly endorse the Edina Soccer Association proposal. Respectfully submitted, Karl F. Diessner /,,� KFD:mlf (Untitled) -- JUNE 16, 1995 TO EDINA CITY COUNCIL; WE WOULD L114E TO EXL)RESS OUR DiSAL'0ROVAL OF THE ULAN TO ELIMINATE THE BANDY ICE RINK AT LOUIS PARK. MARY JANE & IRV LEVINE 7000 ANTRIM ROAD EDiNA, MN 55439 Page 1 SENT BY: 6 -19 -95 : 1 :17PM : DAIN BOSWORTH 927 7645:# 21 3 EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION June 16, 1995 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposal to Convert Lewis Park Dear Mayor Richards, Growing up in the 60's was like driving on a four lane highway. We grew up without fear of violence. Drugs and alcohol were adult problems and most people left their cars and homes unlocked. Today's kids walk through a comparative minefield of serious risks on the way to adulthood. Many don't make it- - -- crimes committed by young people arc at record levels. As concerned and compassionate citizens we can and should react proactively to this problem. Cf there is any truth to the maxim idle handc are tools of the devil, then we should be doing everything within our means to encourage wholesome recreational activities for our young people. The cost of providing these opportunities, in this case improving the utilization of an existing community park, is small compared to the cost of reacting to crimes after the fact. Lewis Park was in place long before the present neighborhood was developed. The original plan for Lewis Park called for expanding the number of soccer /football fields. Today more than ever we need the increased utilization of this facility that our city forefathers had wisely foreseen. On behalf of the Edina Football Association, representing nearly 500 youth football players from grades two through eight and their parents, I strongly urge you to approve the proposed conversion of the Lewis Park bandy rink to a soccer /multi- purpose field. Such a facility would provide much needed play CITY OF W; EDINA 4801 WkST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 SENT BY: 6 -19 -95 : 1 :17PM : DAIN BOSWORTH- 927 7645:# 3/ 3 area for our program and more than 2,000 young Edina soccer players. To spare a handful of neighbors a relatively trivial inconvenience at the expense of much needed youth recreation programs is simply not acting in the best interest of the community of Edina. Respectfully, y Diley President, Edina Football Association cc Bill Jenkins Chairman, Edina Park Board tam CITY or EDINA 4801 WES1 514TH STREET, EDINA. MINNf. OIA 55424 SENT BY: 6 -19 -95 ; 1 :17PM DAIN BOSWORTH- 927 7645;# 2/ 3 EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION June 16, 1995 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposal to Convert Lewis Park Dear Mayor Richards, Growing up in the 60's was like driving on a four lane highway. We grew up without fear of violence. Drugs and alcohol were adult problems and most people left their cars and homes unlocked. Today's kids walk through a comparative minefield of serious risks on the way to adulthood. Many don't make it - - -- crimes committed by young people arc at record levels. As concerned and compassionate citizens we can and should react proactively to this problem. If there is any truth to the maxim idle hands are tools of the devil, then we should be doing everything within our means to encourage wholesome recreational activities for our young people. The cost of providing these opportunities, in this case improving the utilization of an existing community park, is small compared to the cost of reacting to crimes after the fact. Lewis Park was in place long before the present neighborhood was developed. The original plan for Lewis Park called for expanding the number of soccer /football fields. Today more than ever we need the increased utilization of this facility that our city forefathers had wisely foreseen. On behalf of the Edina Football Association, representing nearly 500 youth football players from grades two through eight and their parents, I strongly urge you to approve the proposed conversion of the Lewis Park bandy rink to a soccer /multi- purpose field. Such a facility would provide much needed play #EIIDIONA F 4807 wk5T 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 53424 SENT BY: 6 -19 -95 ; 1:17PM ; DAIN BOSWORTH 927 7645;# 3/ 3 area for our program and more than 2,000 young Edina soccer players. To spare a handful of neighbors a relatively trivial inconvenience at the expense of much needed youth recreation programs is simply not acting in the best interest of the community of Edina. Respectfully, y Diley President, Edina Football Association cc Bill Jenkins Chairman, Edina Park Board ' tam CITY or EDINA 4801 WkSl 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNBO1A 5542.1 Whereas Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. [� Our Families want winter activities available. 0 ❑ I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name Address 7 -. Phone `t`P-t - The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic. i Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. �ur Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. �_U�dina has three other sites which wouldn't call for • 'urinating a Winter Sports Facility. Le is Park is Edina's most used winter facility. dog want increased noise and traffic. Council to reject the park board's proposal to I ask Edina y eliminate the Big Rink at u4wi ar k Signe �, 4�9s Name Address �-'' LAN � t`� �� Phone 2 Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. four Families want winter activities available. 3-The soccer Field is redundant. ❑'Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. U Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed �o Name!v� Address �� � �' Q • �'l �D _- Phone Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑'Our Families want winter activities available. U'**T'he soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used vMt.r facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminat71e ig Rink Lewis Par Signed 2 Name Address - Phone 9`>L/-/34_, 3 _ Whereas: (A Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Whereas: Q Our Families want winter activities available. .�l The soccer Field is redundant. C�1 15 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Co_ uncil to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate a 1,13ig Rink at Lewis P Signe "-�- �✓ Name l' Address c Phone Where as: j$( Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. Ir The soccer Field is redundant. . Rf Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. J4 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 6d I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big ' t Lew' Signed �-" Name Address e o o Phone 2-76 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility., 0 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 0 I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lew' Pa Signed - Name Address !72 0 0 i 3 /,0 Phone 9 / 2 Z SL Where as: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. [i Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 0 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. J2( I do not want increased noise and traffic. El I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rin t .P719, Signed _ YIz Name SYAti� / Address 72-00 OC14, L L R -2-6 3 Phone q 14-72 D 2- 9 7 KARL F. DIESSNER Attorney -at -Law Yorktown Office Court, Suite 159 7101 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Tel. (612) 921 -4944 June 16,, 1995 FAX (612) 921 -3299 Edina;- City- -Courid l Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th' Street Edina, MN­55424 RE: Edina Soccer Association's Proposal Dear Mayor and Council Members: Please be advised that I reside in the Dewey Hill Condominium located at 5601 Dewey Hill Road and hence received the form letter of John Keprios dated May 24, 1995 relative to the proposal to develop Lewis Park Bandy /Skating Rink into a soccer.field. I was shocked when I read the letter of the President'of our Association addressed ..to you advising of the large majority: of the Condominium owners who were oppos,ed..to such a development. This is particularly true that in view of the fact that in all probability, not more than 25% of the Condominium owners can see the Park and any anticipated noise would be negligible. In any event, I cannot think of any greater usage of rarely used property than providing recreational facilities.for our youth. Therefore, even though I have no children nor grandchildren.who would be using the facilities after the development, I strongly endorse the Edina Soccer Association proposal. Respectfully submitted, Karl F. Diessner KFD:mlf (untitled) JUNE 16, 1995 TO EDINA CITY COUNCIL; WE WOULD LIKE TO EXL'KESS OUR DiSAL'L'KUVAL OF THE ULAN TO ELIMINATE THE BANDY ICE RINK AT LOUIS PARK. MARY JANE & IRV LEVINE 7000 ANTRIM ROAD EWNA, MN 55439 Page 1 Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council tqg ect the ark oar s proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Whereas: J. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence GA Our Families want winter activities available. Jd The soccer Field is redundant. 16 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call' for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. U4 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility (A 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. lot W �(N PPS P4 � C, N, I ask Edina City CoVnito r ject t�te p r oar 's proposal o eliminate Big Rink • is Park. Signed Name LP ill — Address -1 W4- Phone �. - - - - - - -- -- Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ ur Families want winter activities available. U The soccer Field is redundant. YEdina has three other sites which wouldn'± call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. wis Park is Edina's most used winter facifity. do not wa t increased noise and traffic. _ s� � I ask Edina City Council o rejec a park board s proposaq to eliminat Big Rinkat is Park. Sign ` Name s* cZV'= l— - A S S Address �1 a i� �. E i. i i ti A.. t Dt,- -e LU - CIA CI r Whereas: J Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. ; �he soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call fir eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. �U Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic. LI I ask Edina City Council to reject the park boar elimina a Big R' k at wis Park. Signe e L�St��O AL Name Phone `fq /' - Whereas: 9 Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. �sk Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate t Big Rink at. wis Park. Signed _ .-sue Name' 9zi,,-7 Address CL���nA� Phone q°�rll,-/ Whereas: P Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. J$1 Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. l Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. . Signed Namur Address I a-no C-4-A, Ze, Phone IA' K --6 111'7 in Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellenc Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't cal' for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facilit I do not want increased noise and trams f�f-ic�. I I ask Edina ity ouncil to reject the park oard's proposal to eliminate toe Big Rink iVt Lewis ark. , Signed -j 1 Name Address 0 Phone ,a Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call f for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. We c,kv,1; gFrorl -tb roge,,Ary i -,0rC— I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name„' G o� ►� ¢" Address Phone -40 -A6 � `A J Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellent ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. • Edina has three other sites which wouldn't cal for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. • Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facilit, ❑ 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. Li I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Nam Addfess Council :e your,,, opinion. MAYOR FREDERICK RICHARDS 925 -7573 �' t =LEGGY KELAsY � DENNIS � mETZOL.D 'o- 925 -8765 ' �. MO�Ti 1 _,. u Jl9NE MUL US r , r . 924 -8776 p GLENN SMITH _ ` L 8Mr 00 k r.'' •y a '; r' v- ._ •. r d....: ° __ ... ui-w. r 3 .. ' x. •§ s - n ...'' ' • � P .: ,� '.. j~ R , {r,",.' � c of uxft V, on, Oft code* ., �i'�{� /_/(�.ff��..... �_�F72' 'r'�' `^1Y/ t��_c ^L`+l/Cr h •47 ,'� ' ]��j� .? i � 5 ��44yt��'� � /�J,y��.'+ 7 ... � e�CJ /. — — • ._�� , a J �� , �/ \= 1 -.1 -• - L- i f ? �.. Q; 'r1 / f+7. I _ / �r 1� S. 'fi, a� in 5,./y/ °T �,i ,,3�^ann': `JY°r''S.� ' J Y: Y ? ..ti, •an., �'`�� %� ..lR,a" AtE .iF. �' • �.. tr. Where as: if Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. i( Our Families want winter activities available. lY The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 06 Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. 0' I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big RiUk at Lewis P k. Signed Name o c. Address 7;Z oo CA a/ L L R J. Pi–.9y I Phone , rJ o,! 9 0 9 Where as: O Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 0 Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. d' Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. UV Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. MI do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at ewis Palk. Signed Name / r nII 0, t-r�+► C' o f� ,y Address_ 7.•Z o o C Arai XD �'� 3:� a Phone 944 – Y3 & Where as: 9K Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name �- Address -1 R r\ Phone y' Y / – .3 D J !q Where as: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. �El The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the eliminate the Big ark board's proposal to g t Lewis �a� Signed 41 Name Ma►gant -r=e Ad `t Phone Ca/riil Rood 1 7 � 7 EXnq MN 55439 Whereas: ❑ LI LI La El LJ I ask Edina Cit y eliminate the Bi ,Pbfl( 1, Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. \. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. {; Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility% I do_ not want increased noise and t affic. • b i i' �t Council to reject the po 66air-dws proposal to Aftk at Lewis P i4;11,4;� i Where as: Jiff. Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. ,VD Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility.. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rin� at Lewis Par . Signed Name s �' Address �' �J°� -2, 6 Phone ^ U 3 Where as: Ef Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. Our Families want winter activities available. I�The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call Iffor eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Co cil to reject the,�park board's proposal to eliminate the Big � at Lgvisc$ar14l. Where as: &r ma is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 0'�Our Families want winter activities available. l The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call �r eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. Rewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. do not want increased noise and traffic. ❑ %_LQr ye.,. I ask Edina City ouncifio 'reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big at Lewis ark Signed Qa,� Name Address -12- O :t o Phone gel ( - (",-:s l $ Stanley- F. Bachman • 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy #206 • Edina. MN 55439 June 9, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Council Members: Our purpose in writing to you is in response to the proposal to deuelop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. We realize how popular soccer is, and the desire to haue more playing fields, but does it does it need to be at the expense of skaters? There are many people who use the ice and who teach their children to skate and enjoy the Minnesota winters. We feel it would be wrong to eliminate this actiuity at the park. In addition, as residents of Lewis Ridge Condominium, we are also opposed to the change because we are concerned about the traffic, noise and the potential parking problem on Lewis Ridge Parkway, which is a private driue. Sincerely, Stanley & Georgia Bachman 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy. #206 Edina, MN. 55439 tel. 943 -1254 1 Dewey Hill West Harold Teachout, Chairman, Board of Directors 5601 Dewey Hill Road #208 Ph: 612 - 944 -3943 Minneapolis, MN 55439 June 8, 1995 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina City Council From: Dewey Hill West Subject: Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy/ skating rink into a soccer field After receiving the first letter on the subject, our Board decided to poll all our residents to determine what, if any, action we should take. We have 58 units in our building of which 38 responded by signing the attached sheet. There are two duplications which means 36 units are represented. Everyone, 100 %, is opposed. As suggested in the letter of May 24th, we are calling to your attention the objections of our residents and plan to have a group attend the June 19th Council meeting. ,6L , arold Teachout Chairman, Board of Directors, Dewey Hill West iii SY.•K?a.a �.c .,. �'> . "n.. i .. ,. •. ,.., :!�.! ,k. •� � �L.,�•.. � �. a._... .e :1 ",.1., .�,.. T�.� r— l.. -•�. _ .. ...:.•1. ..:., .,. .. — cl:^... ._ ,s�t� -L.. .. ... " . SI G 'SHEET -UP ` (It is not necessary to sign your name. It.is your'opimon-that is important. If you have any additional infor. oration that you' wish . o share, :please call me at 942 - 729,6.) _ i. NAME' FOR AGAINST J: r s. I/Cc, iii SY.•K?a.a �.c .,. �'> . "n.. i .. ,. •. ,.., :!�.! ,k. •� � �L.,�•.. � �. a._... .e :1 ",.1., .�,.. T�.� r— l.. -•�. _ .. ...:.•1. ..:., .,. .. — cl:^... ._ ,s�t� -L.. .. ... SI:GNUP :SHEET (It is not necessary to .sign your name. It is,. -opinion p y y ' n thatgis im ortant.If you have an additional information'that you wish to share,_pleas' call me at 942 - 7296.) NAME FOR AGAINST J F,_ L (%I), I ...'. i 4�1� &,,� t 4 � hl� � f /� g-'r i wkel �� 2_4� A7Y-ce, 1�6 OP-e-tl '104 ct_ Sig cz d j, L . /zee aC 6�9�s Nr y i City of Edina May 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. Dear Resident: Please know that the Edina City Council will be addressing the Edina Soccer Association's proposal at the Monday, June 19, 1995, City Council meeting, which begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. On behalf of the Edina Park Board members, I wish to extend a hearty thanks to all those who attended the Edina Park Board meeting on May 9, 1995, to share your views on this important issue. As you may already know, at the May 9, 1995, Park Board meeting, the eleven member Edina Park Board voted 6 to 5 in favor of the Edina Soccer Association's proposal. This recommendation now goes to the Edina City Council on June 19th for final approval or rejection. In spite of the fact that Lewis Park is categorized as a Community Playfield (designed to serve a 16 square mile area) your input is important to those who are charged with the responsibility to make this decision. Therefore, if you have comments that you wish to share with the Edina City Council, I encourage you to please send your comments in writing and address the envelope to: Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 As always, you are also welcome to attend the Edina City Council meeting to share your comments in person. For your information, this notice has been mailed to every Edina resident who resides within approximately 500 feet of Lewis Park. If you have further questions about this matter, feel free to call me at 927 -8861 ext. 230. Many thanks. Si ely, J n Kepr s, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department i City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 (612) 927 -8861 FAX (612) 927 -7645 TDD (612) 927 -5461 �t��►�_ tlt�► . ,3131 1 4t 6 'ia 'C.C.J • v XL c 015 5 . �!� LiG�GI.�I�(l5 CIMSIL An s- L�aac'� 11L4 %b� Lv�- — Loy 4 ,J z DID YOU KNOW ? ?? W The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field,' contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very' X= small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year -round, multi-use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or • write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring Other solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! OEM tz, Ll-'O NI +L) \,\A L-% 41-- Cal L� 4-AT A,,L4L,, I L/ tvL" 6 61-nN-A S LVIJA �Lnst- bu, bww I A&v Yi pia- pLa OEM DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field,' contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very• y= small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi-use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring Qther solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! N: 1 V,a1 �V t',1L u-n6 / yx 61 T I v` tG1Gl l i � a ,- Y �pt� vUl i(: 4 r, �rt�blk,�ts ti�� . S 0,►ul� lktLux U LiU1Zu kacL •u-k P..t.k- juuS bWq rLIVI T � r f - �' � L u,� wl , itc:.• prLZ /��,r, h — i'�" r�LL� s Yt S cr,�.� G1., . u-n6 / DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very, yM small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year- round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring to her solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920 -0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! Wry'. IZA- Z)TL V, t '77 , I I -- !> 7- Ju., �Ucho, T, 4t. (-L-,&, t#7 cam' -1 4-L, FIW $� CIWOZI S/ a'Ait , )tWWL :I DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very, v_„Sr ► small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring to her solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 - -- Peggy Kelly 920 -0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 P.M. We need you. This is the final vote! 412 ��'�tv► (7 �J��..� 1.44 :4 u ✓ �- jsSE z ic.X zti �. tb NW LL. ` ARAS6YI S fO Pt S-1- V :'tk. N �\, I i c.6v l ��"�'� •`�" llC.eLti 5 `fit- �CL�.+.C�L� • NW LL. ` ARAS6YI S fO Pt S-1- V :'tk. N �\, I DID YOU KNOW ? ?? The Edina Soccer Association has proposed to create a "soccer complex" at Lewis Park. This would eliminate the large sheet of ice also known as the bandy rink. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to pay $40,000 for this third field, contingent upon passage of their proposal in its present form, which precludes other sport usages. The large sheet of ice is the most used skating area in the city of Edina where the skaters of all ages can use hockey sticks and pucks. The present plan would leave only the boarded hockey rink and a very, y= small recreational rink. This proposal came before the Edina Park Board in May and was approved with a vote of 6 to 5. Many people are very upset about losing a year - round, multi -use neighborhood park in order to create a "soccer complex ". Do you think it's appropriate that one athletic association can dictate the usage of our park land in a manner that excludes all other uses — skating, hockey, bandy? It's like buying a park for your own sole benefit without paying full market value. A rumor circulating is that the Lewis Park bandy rink closing will mean the reopening of two neighborhood rinks that were closed for lack of usage. This has not been formally proposed to the Park Board, let alone approved by either the Park Board or the City Council. Economics dictated the closing of those rinks in the past and are a compelling reason for not reopening them. This issue is a deflection from the more important issue. The Edina Soccer Association proposal will be voted on by the City Council on Monday, June 19 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. If you do not want to see the creation of a soccer complex to the exclusion of other usages of Lewis Park by the elimination of the large sheet of ice, take action NOW! Call or write the City Council. If you are interested in exploring to her solutions and voicing your opinions attend the City Council meeting. City Council Members Mayor Fred Richards 925 -7573 Peggy Kelly 920-0687 Dennis Maetzold 925 -8765 Jane Paulus 924 -8776 Glenn Smith 831 -9400 Take an hour of your time and come to the City Council meeting June 19th at 7:00 p.m. We need you. This is the final vote! Dear Peggy: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing. (e.g. the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, �ULV� F. Thomas Finnegan / LCJ f-CA fle- &'-0 n4A VLA--P rai S_el� ��/- Dear Glenn: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council ,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April ?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing.(e.g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can in afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan f � 33y -Y�is Dear Fred: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice - skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council ,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April ?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing. (e.g. the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associaton's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan 71/z /k, �e �� /5�� �l Dear Jane: I am writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement. My family and I live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice - skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending to the full Council that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April ?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following: 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing. (e.g. the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before flooding in the fall, better drainage by adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building ". Do not believe the Soccer Associatori s consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYING THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums( many over the age of 50) use this ice as do alot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of parkland to stand useless 6 months.per year when. the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement. Finally, the Soccer Association would-like to paint this as a.hockey vs. soccer issue (or. worse a bandy vs.soccer. issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,l appreciate your consideration of this. matter and.look forward to your support in keeping . Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan ray Dear G1 I a writing to express my concern about a proposed buyout of a portion of Lewis Park for the exclusive use of Soccer. This matter is scheduled to come to a vote before the Council on Monday June 19. I urge you to consider the issues raised in this letter and vote against this exclusive arrangement My family and l live approximately one block from Lewis Park. My wife recently served on a committee designing and selecting new playground equipment for Lewis Park We enjoy recreational opportunities made available at this park including walking ,bike riding, rollerblading,ice- skating etc. It now appears that the ice skating portion of that recreation could be eliminated or severely curtailed. The Edina Soccer Association has proposed, and the Park Board will be recommending _to the#ulLC ouncil,that the city accept $40,000 from the Association and use a major...,. part of the park for soccer while prohibiting the use of this area for skating in the winter. The rationale being that the ice skating area doesn't dry out soon enough to meet their demands(April ?) This proposal comes at a time when the City of Edina needs to be seeking solutions that are inclusive not exclusive. I would ask you to consider the following 0 The area under consideration is the sole area for ice skating recreation for residents of Edina south of crossstown and west of HWY 100. In addition, the warming house serving this rink was built to accomtodate the skaters from a large sheet of ice. If 80% of the ice is eliminated, how long will it be before the warming house is deemed uneconomical for the number of skaters served. 0 Demands on outdoor ice are increasing not decreasing.(e.g.the increased activity of girls hockey.) We can ill afford to be granting certain sports exclusive arrangements to the detriment of others. 0 The alternatives, which would allow the field to be used earlier in the spring for soccer, have not been thoroughly explored. These include plastic sheeting laid down before floodingjn the fall, better drainage by an adding sandy soil, etc. Instead the Soccer Association seems intent on "Empire Building'. Do not believe the _9occer Associatori's consultants who say such solutions are not feasible REMEMBER WHO IS PAYINC THEIR BILL! ............0 If not the legality, I question the advisability of accepting private funds to modify public land for a special interest group in a manner clearly detrimental to the interests of many others. Are other parts of the Edina Parks System for sale to the highest bidder? 0 The sheet of ice proposed for elimination serves Edinans of all ages. The residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums(many over the age of 50) use this ice as do slot of other grandparents and grandchildren. The Park Board has documented that over 5000 people used the ice last year.Iceskating is a sport for life in Minnesota and we should not allow a sizeable piece of park land to stand useless 6 months per year when the needs of all can be addresed if we do not rush to judgement Finally, the Soccer Association would like to paint this as a hockey vs. soccer issue (or worse a bandy vs.soccer issue) IT IS NOT! It is an issue of special interests without regard for the overall welfare of Edina kids and other citizens. Again,I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your support in keeping Edina Parks for the benfit of all and not a well moneyed few. ra., Sincerely, F. Thomas Finnegan - /Dv%j a 6 O�� 1 Jd,rL�% Mj 3 � a,,� LEOUGE 7250 Lewis Ridge Parkway • Edina, MN 55439 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 To: Mayor Frederick Richards Jane Paulus Peggy Kelly Glenn Smith Dennis Maetzold June 15, 1995 This letter is to inform you of the position of the Lewis Ridge Condominium Association regarding the Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy /skating rink into a soccer field. On May 22, 1995, the Board of Directors of Lewis Ridge passed the following resolution. 'The Board believes that the letter dated April 17, 1995, received by all Lewis Ridge residents concerning the Edina Soccer Association proposal to develop Lewis Park bandy / skating rinks into a soccer field is a concern of all individual residents. The Board further believes that the most effective response to this proposal would be for individual owners to write a letter expressing their views directly to The Edina City Council, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The Council meeting dealing with this proposal is scheduled for June 19, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., therefore your letters should be received by the Council at least one week prior to the June 19 meeting." On June 14, 1995, a special meeting of the Lewis Ridge Condominium Association was held at the request of our residents to discuss the soccer proposal. We were pleased to have as our guests; representatives from the Park Department, the Park Board and the Soccer Association. Their talks and participation in a question and answer period helped us better understand the plans for Lewis Park. After a thorough discussion among our residents, a vote was taken by our Association. We vote on a percentage of ownership basis and 78.9772% of Condominium voting power was voted. The result was as follows: Proposal to develop Lewis Park Bandy /Skating Rink into a soccer field. For............................................... ............................... 3.40% Against......................................... ............................... 75.25% Prefer to express their opinion directly to City Council 21.34% Thank you for giving Lewis Ridge Condominium Association the opportunity to state our position on this important matter. Sincerely yours, %1 " e 151�I'GTr Doris F. Clegg President, Lewis Ridge Condominium Association Whereas: ❑ Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate t e Big Rink at Lewis Pr k. -S ) SOIj Signed Name Q Address '' ^ A ^ Cakes! d _ Phone 44 I. - 6 g Whereas: ❑ ° Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. ❑ Our Families want winter activities available. ❑ The soccer Field is redundant. ❑ Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. ❑ Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. ❑ 1 do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the ig jnk at Lewis ark. Signed Name 0 Address 7,200 Phone _Whereas: Edina is known for Winter Sports Excellence. 9(40ur Families want winter activities available. The soccer Field is redundant. Edina has three other sites which wouldn't call for eliminating a Winter Sports Facility. 477 ,Lewis Park is Edina's most used winter facility. I do not want increased noise and traffic. I ask Edina City Council to reject the park board's proposal to eliminate the Big Rink at Lewis Park. Signed Name Address 7e3 0 4 v � one _ yVG -