Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-11-06_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1995 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. # I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of October 16, 1995. II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as pre -list dated November 2, 1995 $20,796.28. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK, NOVEMBER 13 - 19 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 16, 1995. II. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Analysis of Assessment by Engineer or Manager. Public comment heard. Action of Council by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all member of Council required to pass. A. Street Improvement No. BA- 293/BA -299 - Valley View Road, continued from October 2, 1995. City Council. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing . Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Rezoning from R -1 to POD-1, Especially for Children, 5015 West 70th Street. * B. Lot division, 7115 Tupa Drive and 7020 Kerry Road, Johnson and Eckberg. C. Set hearing dates for November 20, 1995: * 1. Preliminary Plat - Tambornino, 6608 Dakota Trail. * 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Community Facilities Element - Public Water System. * 3. Ordinance Amendment reducing number of member of Planning Commission and increasing number of members of the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals. * 4. Ordinance Amendment allowing day care as a conditional use in R -1 District. D. Set hearing date for December 19, 1995 Preliminary Rezoning, PID, Planned Industrial District to POD-1, Planned Office District 5229 Eden Avenue, Laurant/Parks Development. IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall of majority of all members of Council to pass. A. Set November 20, 1995 as public hearing for Ordinance No. 1995 -11 An ordinance amending Code Section 900.18 Subd. 1 regarding the sale of wine in conjunction with the sale of food. * * * * * * * * * * AGENDA/EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1995 PAGE TWO V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Minnesota Valley Landscape Nursery - purchase, delivery, and planting eighteen trees at Braemar and Normandale Golf Courses B. ACCU Fab Steel Works, Inc. - handrail for path connecting Parklawn to Centennial Lakes Park C. Southdale Hennepin Library - purchase of equipment Edina Art Center Media Lab Project D. Fire Department - purchase of kitchen cabinets, drawers and countertops E. Storm Drains System - Braemar Golf Course VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Set Hearing Date - Proposed Increase in Wine /Beer License Fees (12119195). B. 1996 Council Meeting Dates. C. New Wine /3.2 Beer License - New Hong Kong Kitchen. D. Set Public Hearing Date - Preliminary Plan Approval Improvement BA 309 W. 66th St. and BA-311 York for November 20, 1995. E. Set Public Hearing Date Fairview Hospital Bonds for December 4, 1995. F. Edina Aquatic Center Filter Room Repair. G. Riding Scrubber. H. Set 1996 Dates: 1. Council's Annual Meeting 2. Volunteer Recognition Reception VII. COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS * A. Petition for Street Lighting - Intersection of Brookview, Oaklawn & 52nd Streets. VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS * A. Verne Phelps Letter. * B. Bernadette O'Connor Letter. * C. Amy Nymark Letter. IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency /Family Services Collaborative B. League of Minnesota Cities Policies X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGERS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated November 2, 1995 TOTAL: $899,325.84. C I�E O F >C Mon Nov 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Nov 10 VETERANS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Mon Nov 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thu Nov 23 THANKSGIVING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Fri Nov 24 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Wed Nov 29 Truth In Taxation Public Hearing 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Dec 15 Truth In Taxation Public Hearing Cont. Date 5:00 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4i91N� \lj. o e RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Cn �° FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT o• 'cbRWAP'6 City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the improvements listed below: Valley View Road Street Improvement - No. BA- 273/BA -299 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment asset forth in. the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of eight percent (8.0 %) per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1996, to be payable with the genera_ I taxes for the year 1996. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. INSTALLMENTS Valley View Road Street Improvement 10 years No. BA- 273/BA -299 - Levy No. 13520 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate „ of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. 5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said section. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 6, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of November, 1995. WON / - NOU -06 -1995 15:33 P.01 ` Dean M.Johnson SUPERINTENDENT George E. Klippenes t i tl DIRECTOR OF CHURCH PLANTING Tom Mouw ASSISTANT TO THE SUPERINTENDENT North Central District Association 3131 Fembrook Lane North, Suite 222 (612) 553.1860 Plymouth, MN 55447 -5321 Fax (612) 553 -1324 November 6, 1995 Office of the Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: North Central District Association/Williams Real Estate Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: The North Central District Association of the Evangelical Free Church of America wishes, by this letter, to provide additional background information in support of the application of Steve Williams for the rezoning of property at 5015 West 70th Street in Edina. As you may already be aware, our parcel of land is now only 2.6 acres in size. This is smaller than your present zoning requirements that a church be located on 3.0 acres. Our land, when initially Purchased for a church, was in excess of 5.0 acres. There have been several governmental takings that have reduced this parcel to its present size. The State of Minnesota, by action commenced in condemnation in January 1974, took from this parcel 0.4 acres (40 foot wide strip) for highway widening and took an additional 2.31 acres for construction of the intersection. Prior to this action, the church land use plan was to construct a senior residence home, in addition to the Edina Evangelical Free Church. The land size and this land use plan were consistent with City Zoning and land use regulations prior to this taking. We are not able to determine when your land use zoning to require church operations on parcels of 3.0 acres or more became effective. We do know your Zoning Ordinances were modified in 1992, and this is well after the construction of the Edina Evangelical Free Church (Brookview Church). Your present comprehensive land use plan for this property was adopted in 1980. This plan designates use of this property as "quasi public." Since the size of this parcel was reduced due to a "public needs taking," we urge you to take that into account in considering Mr. Williams, request for rezoning. We strongly support this request for rezoning. Sincerely, Dean M. !Jn Superintendent North Central District Association Evangelical Free Church of America Evangelical Free Church of America TOTAL P.01 o e RESOLUTION �° CITY OF EDINA •- .a��EO• HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA City of Edina WHEREAS, Lot 6, Block 3, BRAEMAR HILLS FIFTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and Lot 9, PROSPECT HILLS, according to the recorded plat thereof,are presently single tracts of land; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into new separate parcels (herein called °Parcels °) described as follows: PARCEL A: Lot 6, Block 3, BRAEMAR HILLS FIFTH ADDITION and the west 100.00 feet of Lot 9, PROSPECT HILLS, according to the recorded plats thereof. PARCEL B: Lot 9, PROSPECT HILLS, according to the recorded plat thereof; EXCEPT the west 100.00 feet of said Lot 9. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Edina Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as.contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate s are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Passed and adopted this 6th day of November, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Edina City Council lat its Regular Meeting of November 6th, 1995, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this November 7, 1995 City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 16, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Richards. CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 1995. APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the HRA Minutes of October 2, 1995. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 12, 1995, and consisting of one page totaling $390.90. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:46 PM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12789 11106195 $24.79 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 101995/H GRANDVIEW MISC < *> $24.79* 12790 11/06/95 $879.82 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL FEES 458030 EDINBOROUGH PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $879.82* 12791 11/06/95 $200.00 HARRINGTON CO SEMINAR 103095 50TH STREET MEETING EXPENS 4478 < *> $200.00* 12792 11/06/95 $14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SENIOR COMM HRA BOND PAYMENT NOV 1995 EDINBOROUGH LOAN TO 0TH FU < *> $14,166.67* 12793 11/06/95 $4,360.00 PREMIER ELECTRICAL CORPO ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 9574 GRANDVIEW UNDERGROUND 495 < *> $4,360.00* 12794 11/06/95 $1,165.00 SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B ARCH FEES 95101740 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $1,165.00* $20,796.28* oe��� Cn eae A PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in the United States has reached epidemic stages, and the 15 -24 year -old age group is dying at a faster rate than any other age group; and WHEREAS, red ribbons have been chosen as a symbol of individual and community efforts to reduce the demand for drugs in our communities; and WHEREAS, November 13-19,1995, is MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK; and WHEREAS, business, government law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, communities, neighborhoods, youth, senior citizens and individuals will demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and prevent alcohol and other drug abuse by displaying red ribbons during MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 13 -19, 1995, be declared MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK throughout the City of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council Members of the city of Edina, in recognition of this event, support the activities sponsored by MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK and EDINA CHEMICAL AWARENESS and encourage community participation in drug awareness, education and prevention activities. S r^_JQ_A1 Frederick S. Richards, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 16, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by 'Member Kelly to adopt the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rolccall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RETIREMENT OF POLICE OFFICERS RECOGNIZED Manager Rosland recognized recent Police Department Retirees, Lieutenant Vince Bongaarts and Lieutenant Jay Brask. Lieutenant Bongaarts, hired in 1967, practiced 'Community Oriented Policing' for 27 years until he retired in January, 1995. He understood the needs and desires of the community and actively worked, both on and off-duty, to make Edina a better place to live. Lieutenant Brask, hired in 1965, was instrumental in bringing about changes in police training and procedures, not only in Edina, but in the entire state. He took the lead in Crime Prevention and helped set -up 'Operation ID' for Edina residents. Manager Rosland presented both Lieutenant Bongaarts and Lieutenant Brask with a token of appreciation for their many years of loyal service. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2. 1995, APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 1995. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON REZONING (SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICT TO POD -1 PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT) FOR "ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN ". 5015 WEST 70TH STREET; HEARING CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 6. 1995 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is located at 5015 West 70th Street. The property is Zoned R -1 and developed as a church. 'Especially for Children', a day care provider acquired the building. Since day care is not a permitted principal use in the R -1 district, they propose rezoning to POD -1 (Planned Office District). The preliminary rezoning was continued from September 18, 1995, allowing the proponent time to formulate hard data on the traffic issue and allow staff to research an ordinance amendment which would include day care as an accessory use in the R -1 zoning district. Planner Larsen indicated as an alternative to the requested PODA' rezoning, staff prepared an ordinance amendment which would allow day care, pre - school, and nurseries as a Conditional Use in the R -1 district. The amendment would also set a minimum lot size of two acres and a minimum setback of 35 feet from all property lines. The proponents have indicated to staff that they continue to request the POD -1 office zoning classification. Two letters from banks were offered, indicating that financing may be problematic if the rezoning to POD -1 is not granted. Planner Larsen explained if the Council decides to amend the Ordinance making day care a Conditional Use in the R -1 zone, the amendment should be referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. Planning Commission action is required prior to adoption of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment by Council. The appropriate Council action would be denial of the request to POD -1. The Planning Commission could consider the matter at their November 1, 1995, meeting. At the September 18, 1995, meeting, staff suggested creating a new intersection, adjustments to West 70th Street and Metro Drive and allowing the site additional entrances off the semaphore. Engineer Hoffman submitted a memorandum from the City's traffic consultant addressing the site specific and general area traffic issues. A memorandum, dated October 13, 1995, from Dennis Eyler, P. E. from the SRF Consulting Group, Inc., was submitted as well. Suggestions for the site were a widening of 70th Street at the site location as well as a free -right within the right -of -way from southbound Metro to west bound 70th be created. A protected (green arrow) left turn into the site as well as a curb cut with entrance and egress point at Rabun Drive would also be eliminated. Architect Comment Ed Kodet, Architect with Kodet Architectural Group, and Architect for the proponents, Priscilla and Ed Williams, told they reviewed the traffic patterns that will solve traffic concerns. Mayor Richards advised that Member Maetzold would be participating in discussions and the final vote, contrary to the September 18, 1995, Council meeting. Resident Comments Betty Kaplan, 7305 Oaklawn Avenue, said she has a three year old in day. care at Especially for Children. They are not a fly -by -night day care and she would be saddened if the facility were not available. Theresa Milbourn, 6912 Antrim Road, stated her support of the proposed rezoning. She has two children to support and Edina is a difficult place to find good day care. Admittedly, traffic is a concern but she believes traffic from the day care will not add to the big picture. Nancy Nordquist, 5108 West 70th Street, said traffic is terrible at all times of the day. She stated any additional traffic would be bad. Peggy Halverson, 5108 Abercrombie, said she had signed a petition against the rezoning and questioned whether there would be a four story office building or just a day care. Margie Peter, 5120 Duggan Plaza, indicated she signed the petition against the rezoning, but would support an ordinance amendment. The trees on the site offer the day care a great buffer but her main concern is traffic in the Rabun/70th Street intersection. Engineer Hoffman commented that the proposed reorientation of the intersection would not be a restriction but a normal reconfiguration. Dennis O'Brien, 5141 Meadow Ridge, stated that the area is getting more and more busy. He asked that the use of the site for a day care in the area be considered carefully. Val Vamo, 5112 Duggan Plaza, said the area has always had traffic problems and adding more traffic does not solve the problem. Tim Clark, 5145 Abercrombie Drive, voiced concern that the character of the area will change and Rabun would be impossible to use. Area residents will use the residential streets to exit the neighborhood and that's where all the children are. Trude Bremner, 5104 Abercrombie Drive, inquired whether any Council Member lived in the 70th Street area and if this is a for profit day care. She voiced concern with destruction of the beautiful oak trees and said if the Council changed the zoning code they would be liable. Tom Clifford, 5105 Meadow Ridge, suggested straightening and rerouting Metro Drive to Highway 100. Martha Carlson, resident of St. Louis Park, has a child in Especially for Children. She questioned just how much traffic will be added with the proposed rezoning. Yvonne LaGrandeur, 5108 Tifton Drive, asked what would happen to the day care center now housed in the Community Center if rezoning of the site were not approved. Ted Canova, 5504 Dever Drive, has a child in the center. Definitively, the site could have day care for 100 children or no day care at all. No one is a proponent of traffic or accidents. Dick Kvanbeck, 5511 Hansen Road, has a daughter in Especially for Children. No one wants more traffic in the area. He asked if a light could be installed at Rabun. Proponent Comment Steve Williams, stated his belief that a day care center is an excellent use of the building. He does not intend to build an office building on the site but banks will not finance the site if its not zoned for multi -use. The site is too small for a school or a church. He suggested lighting the intersection with a left turn arrow, allowing left turns from Rabun. Council Comment Member Maetzold commented there will be traffic no matter what the property use is and day care use would only increase daily trips by approximately 76 in the A.M. and 105 in the P.M. In order for the proponent to acquire financing, the site would require rezoning to POD -1 for multiple use. Member Smith agreed the site should remain zoned R -1 with an amendment allowing conditional use. He does not agree with it becoming a future office site or that it be rezoned to raise the finances of the proponent. Member Kelly emphasized something will be done on the site and recommended it remain zoned R -1 with an amendment for conditional use, realizing the Planning Commission would need to approve the amendment. Mayor Richards pointed out that a day care would be a good use for the property. He recommended 1) staff prepare findings and bring them back to Council to denying the formal request, 2) an amendment be drafted to allow a day care center as an conditional use in the R -1 district and 3) creative solutions be sought for the traffic problem. Member Smith made a motion to continue the public hearing on the rezoning request to POD -1, for 5015 West 70th Street to November 6, 1995, allowing staff to 1) establish proposed findings denying the application for rezoning, 2) draft an ordinance amendment allowing day care centers as a conditional use in the R -1 district and 3) that solutions be sought for traffic in the area. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Maetzold Motion carried. REQUEST GRANTED FOR RELOCATION OF CABIN WITHIN THE CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ON LOT 5. MIRROR OAKS ADDITION Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained that the subject property is located at 5000 Blake Road and comprises two lots with total land area, of 10.1 acres. Existing improvements include a single dwelling, a log cabin and a storage building. The site is gently rolling with areas of steep slopes along Blake Road and near the ponds in the south and southwest portions of the property. At the October 2, 1995, Council meeting, Mirror Lakes Final Plat was approved. Eugene Frey has purchased Lot 5 and wished to move the existing log cabin into the conservation restriction on Lot 5. Planner Larsen inspected the site and recommended allowing the cabin to be moved to the proposed location. Approval of modification of the conservation restriction to accommodate the log cabin was continued to the October 16, 1995, meeting for additional information regarding previous exceptions to conservation restrictions. The Conservation Restriction allows the Council the right to allow the cabin to be placed within the restriction without vacating part of the easement. The Conservation Restriction is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The provision is contained in (1) as follows: 1) No buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising of any kind, and no utilities or other structures of any kind, hereafter shall be erected or placed on or above any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina, and that no building within the Easement Area which is approve by Edina shall be used for residential purposes. Planner Larsen told that in the past, the Council has sometimes granted permission or has sometimes released a portion of the restricted area. Recently, the Council released a portion of a restricted area for a house pad on the Dalquist Addition on Harold Woods Lane. Council also granted permission to locate play equipment on a lot on the south side of the same pond. It was previously believed that a request for an easement for a sport court was in reality over a drainage easement rather than within a conservation restriction. Staff would recommend allowing the placement of the cabin within the conservation restriction area on Lot 5, provided the building not be used as a dwelling unit. Presentation by Proponent Eugene Frey, 6231 Fox Meadow Lane, stated the cabin has a historic background and was built by an American Indian. It was used in the filming of a 1930's movie. The one room cabin has a bar and a fireplace and neighbors would also like it preserved. Mr. Frey distributed pictures of the cabin and location maps. The location was necessitated because of the close proximity to large oak trees and concern that it not impinge on the Lot 5 building site. Council Comments Member Smith inquired if the cabin had utilities. Mr. Frey answered the cabin currently has standard hook -ups. If moving the cabin is approved, hooking up to sewer and water would be very costly until a new home were built on the lot bringing sewer and water much closer to the cabin. Mayor Richards called for public comment. No comments were received. Mayor Richards inquired if the encroachment was granted, what process would control where the cabin could be located. Planner Larsen said at this time the location is not exact but an exact location could be made a part of the conservation restriction approval. Use for the cabin as a dwelling could be prohibited within the document also. After researching the site, no notation of historical value is mentioned. The history, while unique, is special only to the property itself. Member Smith asked if after the cabin were allowed to move could the owners come in and apply for a sewer and water permit. Planner Larsen stated the cabin would be considered an out building and more information regarding use would be needed before a permit were granted. Member Paulus said the cabin is substantial in size and could at some time be used as a house or a cabin. She agreed the cabin should have electricity but not sewer and water. Member Maetzold believes the property should be preserved and the proposed location is good. He agreed with Member Paulus that electricity to the cabin is all right, but no sewer and water. Member Kelly indicated the cabin should be preserved and she supported relocation of the cabin with no restrictions. The agreement should state the cabin could not be used as a residence. Mayor Richards voiced concern that all water bodies should be protected. The location of the cabin on the property adequately protects the public interest. He said he may support hook -ups at some time in the future for the cabin. Member Smith introduced and moved adoption of the following resolution approving an electrical hookup and sewer and water utility hookups permitted only at the discretion of the Council: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute a Declaration of Restrictions on the following described property owned by the City: That certain real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: That part of Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Mirror Oaks, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of a line drawn parallel to and one hundred (100) feet northerly of the northerly line, as shown on said plat, of the pond which extends onto said Lot 5. Motion seconded by Member Paulus. Member Kelly introduced an amendment to the motion allowing all utility hookups to the subject property. Motion died for lack of second. Mayor Richards called for a vote on the first motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KUNZ OIL AND LEWIS ENGINEERING COMPANY (5200 EDEN CIRCLE AND 5229 EDEN AVENUE): AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR KUNZ OIL, 5200 EDEN CIRCLE CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19, 1995 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen said the subject property is generally located south of Eden Avenue and west of the railroad tracks and comprises two buildings and multiple parcels, some previously platted and some never platted. Total land area is 342,283 square feet or 7.86 acres. The proposed subdivision would combine all existing parcels into two new lots. Lot 1 would include the Lewis Engineering Building and lot 2 would include the Parts Plus Warehouse building, owned by the Kunz family. The preliminary plat approval for Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering Company, 5200 Eden Circle and 5229 Eden Avenue was continued at the September 18, 1995, Council meeting. Planner Larsen explained that staff has received no additional information since the September 18, 1995, meeting. Planner Larsen noted that Mr. Lewis has just received a purchase agreement for his property resulting from the proposed rearrangement, but a final development plan has not been applied for. The proper process would be to modify the application, appear before the Planning Commission and ultimately before the Council. Council Comment Mayor Richards said he appreciates the dilemma the Kunz Oil people are in but he is not persuaded the plan, as presented, is the best for the area because of the traffic orientation. A great deal of public money has been spent to enhance the Vernon Avenue development. This is an important piece of property and should not be developed in a piecemeal fashion. He felt the issue should be continued until a formal plan for the whole area comes before the Council for approval. Member Maetzold voiced agreement that the development should orient toward north Eden Avenue. Member Smith stated a more aggressive plan for the whole area would be desirable. Member Kelly wondered why the plan presented plan has not taken into consideration comments from the previous hearing regarding traffic concerns. Proponent Comment Walter Kunz, Kunz Oil, explained that since January, access to the Kunz Oil site has been via Eden Circle. Since August 1992 until now, it has not been economically prudent to do anything to the site until the fixed price option ran out on the property. He asked if they now could proceed as a separate parcel. Mr. Kunz added that Gordon Lewis has graciously allowed them to use his property but he could legally restrict use of their loading docks on the entire east side of the building at any time. Mayor Richards said that Mr. Kunz and Kunz Oil have been good corporate citizens in Edina, and any consideration the Council could give should be given. He suggested the possible condemnation of the property to the north allowing proper access to their building as they see fit. Member Smith stated a window of opportunity exists at this time for the City to look at what can be done on the site as well as allowing comments from the public. Mayor Richards inquired if the Preliminary Plat and Final Development Plan were continued, where do we stand legally with timing. Attorney Gilligan responded that legally a 60 day deadline exists from this date. The issue could be continued for further discussion until November 6, 1995, to see what plans come forward. Member Kelly suggested continuing the issue to the Council meeting of November 20, 1995. Mr. Kunz said the Kunz Oil building is deteriorating and needs major work. He voiced concern that another Rainbow type of proposal could come before the Council which took eighteen months before it was rejected. Mayor Richards interjected that the Council is serious about this site. He suggested consideration of utilizing the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District and he would be amenable for use of these funds for a study of the best lot configuration for the site. He suggested continuing the issue to December 19, 1995. Attorney Gilligan's inquired of Mr. Lewis his response to Council continuing action on his property to which Gordon Lewis concurred with the issue being continued for 120 days. Member Smith made a motion to 1) continue the Preliminary Plat for Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering Company, 5200 Eden Circle and 5229 Eden Avenue and Final Development Plan for Kunz Oil, 5200 Eden Avenue, to December 19, 1995, and 2) authorize staff to consider alternatives for ingress and egress from the site utilizing a consultant funded through Tax Increment Financing funds. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED - TAMBORNINO ADDITION (6608 DAKOTA TRAIL) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject property is a developed R -1 lot with an area of 2.9 acres. The existing home is located in the south - central portion of the property and uses Dakota Trail as its driveway access. The proposed subdivision would create two new lots, both fronting on Mohawk Trail. Mayor Richards asked clarification of the Tambornino's requesting a two lot subdivision. He understood the Planning Commission heard a request for a three lot subdivision. The Planning Commission denied the request and Tambornino's are now asking the Council to approve a two lot subdivision. He believes the Planning Commission should hear the two lot subdivision request before it comes to the Council. Proponent Comment Joe Tambornino, 6608 Dakota Trail, spoke to his letter of October 9, 1995, explained he originally wanted to divide the west portion of his property either into one or two additional lots, whichever would gain approval. The Planning Commission denied approval of the three lot subdivision because of numerous variances. Mr. Tambornino, in an attempt to save time, requested two lots rather than three. Tom Meyers, Edina Realty, realtor for the Tamborninos, explained that information the proponent received from staff indicated the plan could be, revised for a two lot subdivision and brought before Council at this time. Public Comment/Concern Doug Watson, 6620 Mohawk Trail, commented that residents in the area should have the ability to present their views on the proposal. Sandy Cwayna - Halla, 6601 Mohawk Trail, noted that no one suggested a two lot subdivision at the Planning Commission meeting. Lorelei Bergman, Planning Commissioner, commented if a two lot subdivision had been suggested, she would have voted for it. Don Halla, 6601 Mohawk Trail, indicated that residents living on the east side of Mohawk Trail and Dakota have no problem with subdivisions into lots equal to lots on the west side of Mohawk Trail. Neighbors in that block feel that it is fair and just. The area on the west side is comprised of same size lots as those being proposed. No one with larger lots on the east side is opposing the three lot subdivision. The lots should be an appropriate size for the neighborhood. Council Comment/Action Mayor Richards commented the proposal's merits are not being questioned or whether it should or should not be approved. Concern is the that proposal presented is consistent with the one presented at the Planning Commission. Member Kelly reminded the proponent that public business is handled in public. The Planning Commission did deny the three lot subdivision at their meeting, if the proposal is not approved at this time, as per Edina's Code it could not come back for a year. A letter dated October 11, 1995, was submitted by Attorney Gilligan stating the location of his residence is in close proximity to the subject property. While he does not believe this presents a conflict of interest under ethic rules, the Council should be aware in case legal issues arise with respect to the proposed subdivision. Member Smith made a motion to refer the preliminary plat approval, Tambomino Addition, 6608 Dakota Trail to the Planning Commission meeting of November 1, 1995, allowing Dr. Tambomino to present a two lot subdivision, with Council review on November 20, 1995. Motion was seconded by member Kelly. Planner Larsen recommended Dr. Tambomino withdraw the three lot subdivision request. Dr. Tambomino stated he did not mean to confuse anybody, formally withdrew the three lot subdivision request and agreed to seek Planning Commission review of the two lot request at their November 1, 1995. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY - SOUTHDALE LIBRARY (7001 YORK AVENUE) LIBRARY EXPANSION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen reported the Southdale Hennepin Area Library is located at 7001 York Avenue. Libraries and public facilities such as the Court facility are permitted Conditional Uses in the R -1 zoning district. A Conditional Use permit was granted for the current Library-Court facility in March, 1991. The County is proposing to amend the permit to allow the construction of a two story addition measuring 33 feet by 33 feet, and located in the southeasterly corner of the building. The ground floor addition would provide a secure indoor area for the transfer of prisoners to the holding cells and court rooms on the second floor. The second floor would provide space to increase the number of holding cells and interview rooms. According to the project architect's letter, the number of judges or other staff would not be increased. The design and materials would match the existing facility. Planning Commission Members were in agreement that the proposal would have minimal impact on surrounding properties and would afford the court system transfer of prisoners out of public view in a more secure manner. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Proponent Comment Ray Johnson, Property Manager for Hennepin County, stated he hoped the last expansion met with Council approval and hopes the current proposal is also approved. The Sheriffs parking will now be enclosed within the sally port allowing prisoner transfer in a secure manner. Council Comment/Action Mayor Richards commented that the last library expansion seemed to take forever and inquired how long this expansion would take. Mr. Johnson replied that during the last expansion asbestos removal added quite a bit of time to construction. Since the current proposed addition does not include any remodeling it should not have the same constraints. Member Smith moved approval of the Conditional Use Permit, Hennepin County, Southdale Library, 7001 York Avenue, building expansion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR 1996 PARK AND RECREATION ACTMTIES DIRECTORY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for the Park and Recreation Department's 1996 Activities Directory to recommended low bidder, Northwest Printing Company at $13,690.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote -five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FENCING FOR THE EDINA AQUATIC CENTER Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for fencing for the Edina Aquatic Center to recommended low bidder, Keller Fence Company at $14,995.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF OCTOBER 3. 1995, APPROVED Engineer Hoffman pointed out at the October 3, 1995, Traffic Safety Committee meeting, special attention was drawn to Section A. (1), the signalization of Xerxes Avenue at West 60th Street. Staff recommended approval of this project conditionally based on acceptable financial arrangements between the City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County and the City of Edina. Engineer Hoffman withdrew the issue until the next meeting while awaiting final arrangements with the City of Minneapolis. Member Smith made a motion to approve the following actions as recommended in Section A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of October 3, 1995: 1) Staff continue the issue of signalization of West 60th Street at Xerxes Avenue conditionally until financial arrangements between the City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County and the City of Edina can be secured; 2) Staff supports the review of traffic conditions on West 70th Street between Metro Boulevard and T.H. 10; and to acknowledge Section B, 1, and 2 and Section C. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. Member Kelly voiced concern with Section B. 3 which requested STOP signs controlling Division Street traffic at Spur Road. Staff recommended denial of the request based on lack of warrants. Staff further recommended the Police Department respond to the patterned hazardous speeders. Member Kelly said this issue has been before the Traffic Safety Committee before. The intersection is a bus stop and very busy at 8:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. She is always willing to give residents STOP signs and would not support the Committee decision on Section B. 3 denying the request. Member Smith made a motion to approve the following actions as recommended in Section B, 3. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ORDER FOR HOUSE PAINTING APPEAL HEARD: DATE OF JUNE 1. 1996, SET FOR COMPLETION OF ORDER Sanitarian Velde advised that on September 26, 1995, he investigated a complaint at a home at 4245 Alden Drive which was lacking paint. Upon observation, he noted the home had badly deteriorated paint on the south and east sides and the roofing was badly cracked, crumbling and in poor condition. The homeowner, Herbert Knox, was notified that the home was in violation of Edina Ordinance No. 725.08 and he was directed to replace the roof, and scrape, prime and paint the exterior. Mr. Knox asked for an extension of time to make necessary repairs, however, he was unable to give assurance the work would be completed in a timely manner. Several years ago, Mr. Knox explained the condition of the home to Sanitarian Velde that he was researching various paint formulas and the home would be painted as soon as possible. At this time, Mr. Knox claims he is unable to paint the home or replace the roof because of his financial condition. Sanitarian Velde stated that a letter he sent to Mr. Knox directed him to replace the roof and paint the house by October 31, 1995, and that Mr. Knox is exercising his right to appeal the order to the City Council. At this time Council action may affirm Sanitarian Velde's order in whole or in part, or deny the existence of a violation of Ordinance No. 725.08. Further, if Council find that a violation exists, they may either confirm or modify the corrective action to be taken as well as the time allowed to correct the code violation. However, no provision exists for the City to do the repairs and assess the costs against the property. If the Council finds Mr. Knox in non - compliance, a formal complaint may be sought in District Court and or the property condemned as unfit for human habitation. Sanitarian Velde presented slides showing condition of Mr. Knox's home. Sanitarian Velde answered Council inquiry that he does believe the paint on the home is lead based, but it has not been tested. Herbert Knox presented a letter from C. Waldo Emerson, 6528 Humboldt Avenue South, Richfield, a roofer who had recently inspected the roof at 4245 Alden Drive, stating he found no evidence of leaking and deemed the roof fine for the time being. Mr. Knox commented he is trying to resolve the issue in a systematic way, i.e., the more oil -based paint that comes off would make it easier to change the paint to latex. He is unemployed and cannot afford to do the work all at once. Taxes are current on the home even though the valuation does not equate with his neighbors and he has not sought assistance. Responding to Mayor Richard's inquiry whether the City could examine the inside of the home to establish the facts. Mr. Knox responded no due to the hostility of the action by the City. Mayor Richards asked when the home would be painted. After a brief discussion, Mr. Knox said the work would be done one year from the date of the letter (September 26, 1996) or the home would have a new owner. He asked Council consideration. Member Smith made a motion setting July 31, 1996, as the deadline for completion of work at 4245 Alden Drive. After a brief discussion, the motion died for lack of a second. Member Maetzold affirmed the corrective action date of October 31, 1995, as the deadline for completion of work at 4245 Alden Drive. Motion died for lack of a second. Member Kelly commented that Mr. Knox has had adequate time to respond to the discussion he had with the City three years ago and now to the complaint. She informed him that resources exist to help with situations such as these and explained that when neighbors complain the City must act. Member Smith made a motion setting June 1, 1996, as the deadline for completion of work at 4245 Alden Drive. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Member Paulus said if the home were going to be marketed under FHA regulations, all work orders would need to be completed prior to closing. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. WINE LICENSING REVIEWED; PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET OF NOVEMBER 20, 1995 Assistant Manager Hughes reported on September 18, 1995, the Council received correspondence from Wayne Kostroski, with respect to the City's Liquor Ordinances. He particularly requested that the Liquor Ordinances be amended to permit the sale and service of wine or beer to a guest of a restaurant without the requirement that the guest purchase or receive any food. City Ordinances currently prohibit the service of wine and intoxicating malt liquor to a person who does not order a meal (the service of non - intoxicating malt liquor is similarly prohibited if served in a restaurant which possesses a wine license). After considering Mr. Kostroski's comments, staff was instructed by the Council to present information concerning: 1. History of the 1984 Advisory Referendum with respect to wine licensing. 2. Report from the Police Department concerning violations of our Liquor Ordinance. 3. Police Department's assessment of the risk that would be involved if the City were to amend the Liquor Ordinances as requested by Mr. Kostroski. The 1984 Advisory Referendum asked the following question: "Shall the City of Edina issue on -sale licenses to qualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine in conjunction with the sale of food ?" Edina citizens voted yes over no by a three to one margin. If the Council wishes, staff could proceed with preparation of necessary ordinance amendments for consideration at the November 6, 1995, meeting. Deputy Chief Siitari explained that the current Police liquor inspection program has been reviewed during the last four years. Violations fell mainly in the category of violating the Edina - speck regulations on serving wine (i.e. no licensed manager on duty and serving wine prior to the meal order). One instance was detected of underage service. No calls for service related to intoxicated or disorderly patrons at any licensed location have been received. Staff considered an assessment of risk if the ordinance were amended as proposed and sees little or no impact on public safety. The restaurant setting does not provide an atmosphere that promotes alcohol related problems. Member Kelly asked what the cost would be to monitor the restaurants. Deputy Chief Siitari believed the budgeted twice- annual inspection policy would be adequate. Wayne Kostroski, an owner of Tejas, emphasized how important this issue is to the restaurant industry which is based on hospitality. The intent of the change is to improve service and guest satisfaction of restaurant patrons. Mr. Kostroski indicated confrontations occur when patrons request wine or beer previous to being seated and are told they can't be served to be served. Increasing beer or wine consumption is not the intent of this proposal but instead to better serve their patrons. Mr. Kostroski dramatically calculated dollars lost over a year and asked Council consider amending the existing Ordinance. Mayor Richards believes the Council is being asked to be clairvoyant as to the intent of the voters in 1984. He is not concerned with the profit margin or whether patrons are confrontational, the issue is what did the voters in 1984 intend. Member Maetzold said his recollection of the referendum's intent was it referred to serving wine/beer in a restaurant as opposed to wine /beer bar. If voters were polled in 1984 and again today, regarding the appropriateness of serving wine /beer previous to being seated or ordering food they would allow serving prior to seating or ordering. Member Maetzold believes the issue not addressed is whether ordering wine /beer at a non -meal time and leaving should be allowed. It is his opinion this would be a minor occurrence and would be within the referendum's intent. Member Kelly believes the intent of the referendum was that wine/beer be served only with a meal. Amending the ordinance to allow persons to drink wine /beer while waiting is against the ordinance as written. She believes a resolution should be sought from a vote of the citizens. Mayor Richards explained the referendum intent was that no person may go to a restaurant for the sole purpose of drinking. He has changed his mind since 1984, with an enlightened approach that a person could have a glass of wine /beer before attending a movie. Mayor Richards said a modernization of the rules would be appropriate. Member Paulus felt if each voter in 1984 were polled, they would not be able to explain how the referendum was interpreted. It is the-Council's duty to interpret how it best relates to Edina. Police reports have shown the ordinance has little affect if any at all and a referendum would be unnecessary. She would agree to an ordinance amendment. Member Smith stated that in his opinion this now becomes an enforcement issue. He recommended that staff develop an amendment to the ordinance allowing an on -sale wine /beer licensed restaurant to serve wine /beer prior to being seated or ordering food and have it be on the agenda for the November 6, 1995, Council meeting. Mayor Richards took a straw poll of the Council. The consensus was that the ordinance would be modified to say a glass of wine /beer would be allowed before food is ordered. Members Maetzold and Paulus would go a step further and allow a person to order a glass of wine/beer at anytime with no intention of ordering food. Member Paulus pointed out the tremendous difficulty with this being enforced. Member Smith reminded Council that restaurants are in the primary business of selling food. If someone ordered a glass of wine /beer without ordering food he wouldn't care. Member Kelly said enforcement would be impossible. If the amendment is approved, the City might as well have full liquor licensing. In her estimation entering a restaurant with the sole intent of ordering wine /beer is not a reasonable interpretation of the ordinance as it is. Mayor Richards wants persons entering a restaurant to have a primary intention of ordering food, whether it is pastry, dessert, or an hor 'd oeuvre. Member Smith asked if the interpretation would allow persons in the waiting area be served a wine /beer. Mayor Richards answered yes. Member Smith concurred. Mayor Richards if the amendment says no food is necessary at all, a tavern type of setting is established. Licensing should still be of a sit down restaurant with or without a waiting area. People will still leave without ordering food but the intent would be to order food. Member Paulus inquired what the restaurant owner will instruct staff to say to their patrons. Mayor Richards said as part of the ordinance, every on -sale wine licensed establishment could make their sales checks available for inspection/evaluation. Regulations could be structured accordingly through the ordinance amendment.. Member Kelly said Tejas does their notification of patrons very well with a posted sign stating the Ordinance in their entry. Member Smith reminded that the current Ordinance requires either posting of a placard stating the wine service requirement in a public place or as a part of the menu. Member Maetzold voiced concern having an Ordinance that is difficult to enforce. He suggested allowing the sale of wine /beer without food and to revisit the issue in six or twelve months to see if any problems exist. Mayor Richards stated this issue was put to the voters in the 40's or 50's. The logical extension of the argument would be, should the City of Edina issue on -sale wine licenses at all, but that is not what was voted on. If the Council wants to do what Member Maetzold suggested, it should be voted on. Warren Beck, owner of the Galleria, said he does not believe voters in 1984 spent one - millionth of the time focusing on the phrasing of the ordinance referendum than has been spent during this discussion. People do not read posted signs nor do they understand them. His recall was that the wording on the referendum was structured in such a way that it was clear to the voters that wine was going to be added to an existing restaurant base. Ten years have passed since the referendum with virtually no incidents or problems. Further, any incidents of enforcement center around the wine /beer and food issue. The issue has been sliced and diced to the point where we are far beyond the original intent which was a sit -down restaurant with wine /beer. The Council has the power to amend the Ordinance without going to the voters for a referendum. Mayor Richards asked if stopping for a beer on the way home from work is all right. Mr. Beck replied people do not hang -out in these type of restaurants to consume numerous wine /beers. Karen Knudsen, 50th and France Association, spoke on behalf of the Board of Directors, voicing favor of the proposed ordinance amendment. Having quality restaurants is important to the business community. The amendment would allow local restaurants to compete with surrounding businesses. Member Maetzold suggested restaurant patrons could be offered a menu when wine /beer is ordered. He believes this was the intent of the referendum. Member Smith believes juggling a glass of wine /beer and a menu would be even more restrictive. Member Kelly suggested amending the ordinance by adding a sunset provision for a six month period. Mayor Richards concluded the consensus of the Council was that the ordinance include that patrons could, before they were seated, be offered a wine /beer. He offered an additional amendment stating that patrons were free to order a wine /beer without the necessity of ordering food. A public hearing should also be held for public input. Member Paulus asked, 1) what enforcement problems are being created with this amendment and 2) if a wine/beer license allows all types of beers to be sold. Manager Rosland said a wine /beer license would allow the sale of all types of beer Member Smith said he believes Council consensus is that no sunset be added to the amendment. Mayor Richards pointed out each license is open to scrutiny at any time. To assure a full complement of members, he suggested the amendment be on the Council agenda November 20, 1995, and be advertised and posted as a public hearing. Member Smith suggested to staff that the amendment be strengthened regarding wine managers being on site. Member Paulus made a motion setting a public hearing date of November 20, 1995, for review of the wine license ordinance amendment. Member Kelly seconded the motion Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES REPORT PRESENTED Assistant Manager Hughes reported that discussions were held at two previous Council meetings regarding the Metropolitan Livable Communities report. On September 18, staff reported the status of negotiations with the Metropolitan Council with respect to the Act. At that time, staff transmitted a draft Housing Goals Agreement prepared by the Metropolitan Council. The agreement provided the current City index and benchmarks for housing affordability, life cycle opportunities and density. The purpose of the agreement is to establish goals for each of these three categories. The Metropolitan Council prefers the City's goals equate to the "benchmarks" established for each of the categories. Staff prepared a revision to the Housing Goals Agreement. Based upon the agreement, the City would agree to goals for affordability, life cycle opportunities and density which are equal to our current City index. In the case of life cycle opportunities and density, these goals are within the benchmarks established by the Metropolitan Council and therefore are clearly acceptable. In the case of affordability, our proposed goals (equal to our current City index) are substantially less than the benchmarks. The draft agreement prepared by staff provides findings and conclusions supporting such goals. The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed our proposed Housing Goals Agreement. Their staff advises that they would accept, on the staff level, our draft agreement albeit reluctantly. They encourage the City to adopt affordability goals showing an intent to increase, rather than simply preserve our current percentage of affordable housing. Based upon our findings, an increase may be practically impossible to achieve. The City must decide by November 15, 1995, whether or not it desires to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The Council need not conclude a Housing Goals Agreement by this date, however, such an agreement must be successfully negotiated prior to January 15, 1996. Assistant Manager Hughes said the Council has three choices:. 1) Chose not to participate at all. Consequences would be: a) some funding may not be available to us, b) politically - the Metropolitan Council mus issue a ruthless disclosure to the Legislature advising who elected to participate and who has not. 2) Adopt a resolution indicating willingness to participate in the program by November 15, 1995. It would be acceptable to defer the housing goals agreement until January 15, 1996. 3) Adopt a resolution indicating participation in the program and approve draft agreement as submitted for formal submission to the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council staff would be willing to appear at the November 6, 1995, Council meeting if Council wishes. Member Smith made a motion that the City of Edina participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. Motion was seconded by Member Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards inquired whether Council would need additional time or discussion to defer the program until January 6, 1996. Member Maetzold asked if participating with another community has been considered. Assistant Manager Hughes explained the Council would have until June 30, 1996, to adopt a plan. Within that process working with another city in a cluster type arrangement could be discussed. Mayor Richards asked if the City's mission statement makes mention of home ownership. Assistant Manager Hughes recalled that ownership /rental is not mentioned but single family dwellings are part of the statement. Mayor Richards said he believes a community is stronger if property is owned rather than rented. Member Smith elaborated within Edina, programs exist for people to be helped with home ownership. Member Paulus suggested the Metropolitan Council should be made aware of the high proportion of senior citizens in Edina. Cities like Edina need to lower their economic strata to be more inclusive. Mayor Richards said this seems defensive in nature. Member Kelly suggested inclusion of nursing facilities into the study. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (1995 Minnesota Laws Chapter 255) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentives account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup finding from the- Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, by June 30, 1996, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council must adopt, by resolution after a public hearing, the negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each municipality by January 15, 1996; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15, of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1996, a metropolitan area municipality can participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 only if: a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1995; b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality successfully negotiate affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality; and c) by January 15, 1996, the Metropolitan Council adopts by resolution the negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each municipality; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Edina. hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during calendar year 1996. Mayor Clerk Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PARK REFERENDUM TEAM APPOINTED: REFERENDUM DATE TO BE SET BY PARK REFERENDUM TEAM Mayor Richards informed Council that as a follow -up to discussions at the September 18, 1995, Council meeting, a Referendum Team of volunteers, comprised of City staff, members of athletic organizations and active, involved Edina citizens has been assembled. An organizational meeting of the Referendum Team is scheduled for November 13, 1995, at 5:00 P.M. with the first formal meeting to be in January, 1996. The date of the Park Referendum will be set after the Park Referendum Team's organizational meeting. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Mayor Richards recommended Council appointment of Hugh Wooldridge to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1996, and Ardis Wexler to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1997, on the Human Relations Commission. Member Smith made a motion appointing Hugh Wooldridge to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1996, and Ardis Wexler to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1997, on the Human Relations Commission. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION HELD Mayor Richards explained reducing the number of Planning Commissioners to nine from eleven would afford a good cross - section of members and be acceptable. Member Smith inquired whether a formal notice would be needed to modify the ordinance to establish the Planning Commission with nine members. Mayor Richards noted Council consensus was to direct staff to draft a modified ordinance and follow the process necessary to change the number of Commissioners on the Planning Commission from eleven to nine. 2. 1995 Manager Rosland advised that on November 2, 1995, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) will conduct its policies and legislative proposals adoption meeting. Staff has reviewed the policies and proposals and Manager Rosland would represent the City and their wishes. Mayor Richards asked for Council concerns regarding the policies and proposals. Council consensus was that the proposals as presented were supported. CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 12, 1995, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $366,233.58; C.D.B.G. $3,958.00; Communications $26,847.26; Working Capital $139,533.46; Art Center $4,663.27; Swimming Pool Fund $4,583.02; Golf Course Fund $26,188.21; Ice Arena Fund $15,334.14; Gun Range Fund $356.45; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $19,214.79; Utility Fund $258,654.72; Stone Sewer Utility Fund $3,836.57; Recycling Program $35,219.40; Liquor Dispensary Fund $64,825.80; Construction Fund $407,407.81; TOTAL $1,376,856.48; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 5, 1995, and consisting of 6 pages: General Fund $164,337.65; Swimming Pool Fund $135.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $211,913.05; TOTAL $376,385.70. Member Smith seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes:. Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards adjourned the meeting at 11: 18 P.M. City Clerk i 'w91�,1 O e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II.A. FROM: Francis Hoffman' � Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 6 November, 1995 ❑X To Council SUBJECT: Continuation of Action ❑ Motion Special Assessment Hearing Regarding BA- 273/BA -299 0 Resolution Valley View Road ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve special assessment rates of $20.00 per foot for single family property, $30.00 per foot for multiple family property and $40.00 per foot for commercial property, and appropriate adjustments if deemed appropriate by City Council. Info /Background: Attached is the letter sent to Southdale Road property owners after the last discussion at City Council. This letter was attached to the special assessment notice which varied from $459.00 to $935.00 per property. Also attached is a copy of the overhead used at the last meeting. Staff has received only two responses at this point. These responses are attached. The first suggests that no benefit is gained. The second letter (Mr. James Jenewein) also views the assessment as not appropriate due to the belief that this project corrected a deficiency created by the City many years ago. During neighborhood meetings that staff conducted prior to the project, many of the long term residents of Southdale Road expressed similar opinions. Staff would recommend reviewal of the issue and the backyard status which would not allow access in the future. Finally, if changes are made to the original assessment rate or total, the residents would be notified of the new assessment value. oe troll,, s C N''J may/ City of Edina October 20, 1995 Dear Resident: Please review the attached public hearing notice regarding special assessments for the Valley View Road project that occurred behind your property. City staff has reviewed this issue with City Council and will be discussing this matter on November 6th, 1995 at the Edina. City Council Meeting at 7:00 p.m. The reason City staff had asked that the hearing be delayed was for the purpose of discussing what, if any, special assessment should occur regarding your property. The proposed assessment that is listed on the attached notice would be based on the lineal feet of your back yard multiplied by a rate of $6.67 per lineal foot. (This is one -third of the normal front yard rate which is $20 per front yard lineal foot.) An example would be: if your lot had a back yard distance of one hundred feet (100') multiplied by a rate of $6.67, then your property assessment would be $667. However, on two previous projects, City Council has reduced that back yard rate by 50% due to special circumstances. Staff has suggested that such condition may exist in this case. Preliminary City Council review suggests that they believe some benefit was gained by this project relating to your property. This proposed assessment would occur over a 10 year period. In the example cited earlier in this letter, a $667 assessment would result in a $67 per year assessment with interest calculated at 8% on the unpaid balance. Please contact me or send your comments regarding this issue to me by November 1st and I will include them in my staff report to City Council which will be reviewed by City Council on the November 6th, 1995 meeting at 7:00 p.m. My phone number is 927 -8861. Sincerely, �� is J F Ho fman ranc Director of Public Works & City Engineer FJH /dj City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 VALLEY VIEW ROAD • Continue hearing to November 6th meeting • Review past projects where backyard assessment was done A. Dewey Hill Road -1/3 backyard rate became 1/6 backyard rate due to unusual shape of lots /no access B. Oxford Alley - Users paid twice of what the non -users paid • Normal Policy: $40 per front foot - commercial $30 per front foot - multiple $20 per front foot - single family residential Sideyards & backyards at 1/3 the rate of front yards • Current 1/3 rate for backyard of Southdale Road properties ranges from $459.00 to $935.00 • Discuss whether to follow 1/3 rule or special condition as result of berm and no access. Also varying lengths of backyards create value difference. PSW Mr. P. R. Costello 6821 Southdale Rd. Edina, MN 55435 - - - - � - - -- - � -- Alf+-mil - -- - - � - - - - -- - - - �- - - - - - -� -- C. tt - -- Csl4/A—'1_ November 1, 1995 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Attn: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works and City Engineer Subject: City Council Special Assessment Meeting November 6,1995 Dear Mr. Hoffman: This letter is in response to your letter of October 20,1995. I would appreciate if you would pass it on to the City Council. My concern is the special assessment for Southdale Road screening. About 20 years ago the residential properties from 66th Street to 69th Street on Southdale Road had a buffer and dense trees between them and France Avenue. This buffer and screen was in place until Southdale Office Center was developed. The Southdale Office Center was built on land zoned C -2. This project totally destroyed the existing buffer and screening to Southdale Road properties. During design and construction of the Office Center, the project did not address zoning conditions of C -2 next to R -1 which should have included a buffer, screening, and becming of parking lots, etc. For 15 years the residents of Southdale Road endured 5:00 AM trash pick -up, after hour parties in the parking lot, all night snow removal, etc. On August 15, 1988 Rick Hauritz, 6613 Southdale Road and Jim Jenewein, 6905 Southdale Road presented concerns to the City Council regarding the lack of a visual barrier between Southdale Office Center (C -2) and Southdale Road properties (R -1). After discussion the City Council voted unanimously to replace screening that was lost in the Office Center development between Valley View Road and Southdale Road properties. Council member Smith directed Fran Hoffman to proceed with plans and constriction of the screening project. It should be noted that the screening project was approved by the City Council several years before the Valley View improvement project. Now, screening is re- established after a 20 year loss. Why should we have to pay for replacing the screening that we lost with the development of the office project. I would like to re- emphasize that the replacement of screening between Southdale Road properties and Valley View Road was approved several years ago as a separate project before the Valley View improvement project was approved. The Southdale Road properties adjacent and with no access to Valley View Road received no increase in property value from the Valley View improvement project. I want to point out that no special assessment can logically be applied to Southdale Road properties from the Valley View improvement proj ect. I would like to compliment Fran Hoffman and his staff for their outstanding effort with the Valley View improvement project. Sincerely, James E. Jenewein, PE 6905 Southdale Road Edina, NW 55435 1 <` TO: FROM: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Kenneth Rosland Craig Larsen DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: S -95 -5. Preliminary Rezoning, R -1. Single Dwelling Unit District. to POD -1. Planned office District. 5015 West 70th Street. Info /Background: Agenda Item # I I I • A. F1 Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion As directed by Council at their October 16, 1995, meeting, staff has drafted the attached Findings, Decision, and Reason which support denial of the proposed rezoning. The Findings have been reviewed by the City Attorney. CITY OF EDINA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF STEVE WILLIAMS FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 5015 WEST 70TH STREET DRAFT FINDINGS, DECISION, AND REASONS The above entitled matter was heard before the City Council, City of Edina, on September 18, October 16, and November 6, 1995. Steve Williams (the "Proponent ") and his architect Ed Kodet were present. The City Council, having heard all of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, his architect, city staff, and property owners in the vicinity of the subject rezoning and having heard and reviewed the evidence and law addressed by the Proponent, his representative, city staff, and property owners, and being fully advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following: y la-mm-111 1. The Proponent, on August 16, 1996, submitted an application for rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District for a 2.9 acre tract of land located at 5015 West 70th Street. The property is developed with a building and other improvements which were used as a church. According to the application for rezoning and city records, the owner of the property is the North Central Association of the Evangelical Free Church of America. A Mr. Dean M. Johnson signed the application for rezoning for the property owner. Findings, Decisions Steve Williams Page 2 DRAFT 2. The proposed rezoning would transfer the property from R -1 to POD -1, where day care is a permitted principal use. Day care is not a permitted principal use in the R -1 district. The Proponent proposed to operate a day care on the site. In connection with the rezoning the Proponent also presented plans for 5,700 square foot addition to the existing building. The plans called for revised access to the site at the 70th Street and Metro Boulevard intersection. The existing curb cut on West 70th Street, near Rabun Drive, was proposed to remain. The plans also suggested a future phase of development containing a three story office building with a total floor area of about 15,000 square feet. 3. The proposed rezoning was considered by the City of Edina Planning Commission (the "Commission ") at their August 30, 1995, meeting. After considering the report of the Planning Department and testimony by the Proponent, his architect and property owners in the vicinity, the Commission voted 6 -2 to recommend approval of Preliminary Rezoning to the POD -1 district. 4. The proposed rezoning was scheduled for a public hearing before the Council on September 18, 1995. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun - Current and was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. The Council received the recommendation of the Planning Commission and heard testimony by city staff, the Proponent and his architect. Also, testifying were property owners in the DRAFT Findings, Decisions Steve Williams Page 3 vicinity who stated objections to the proposed rezoning and the resultant traffic increases, especially during the morning and evening peak hours. Property owners located in the Brookview Heights neighborhood testified as to the difficulty of entering onto West 70th Street from Rabun Drive during morning and evening peak traffic periods. The only southerly egress for the Brookview Heights neighborhood is from Rabun Drive onto West 70th Street immediately north of the site. After hearing testimony from the Proponent and property owners the Council continued the proposed rezoning to its October 16, 1995, meeting and directed the city staff and Proponent to provide more information on the traffic impact of the proposed rezoning. 5. The Council was advised by city staff, at their October 2, 1995, meeting, that new state law requires that the City approve or deny a rezoning action within 60 days of receiving a complete application. City staff recommended the Council grant the provided 60 day extension to allow adequate time to complete the requested traffic analysis. The Council granted the 60 day extension. The Council also directed city staff to prepare Zoning Ordinance amendments necessary to allow day care as a permitted Conditional use in the R -1 district. 6. The Council again considered the proposed rezoning at its October 16, 1995, meeting. City staff presented the recommendations of the city's traffic consultant, SRF, Inc. The recommendations included changes to the proposed access to the subject property and Findings, Decisions Steve Williams Page 4 DRAFT recommendations to improve access to West 70th Street from Rabun Drive. The Proponent's architect concurred with the recommendations of the traffic consultant. Property owners testified opposing the proposed rezoning and the negative impact of additional office development on traffic congestion. After considering testimony of city staff, the Proponent and his architect, and property owners, the Council continued the public hearing to its November 6, 1995 meeting. The Council also reviewed Zoning Ordinance amendments necessary to allow day care as a permitted conditional use in the R -1 district, and referred such amendments to the Planning Commission for its recommendation. 7. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use map designates this site as "Quasi Public ". This designation includes churches, private schools, private golf courses, and cemeteries. The proposed rezoning would require amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to ensure consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the City's Zoning Ordinance. 8. The City's Comprehensive Plan contains the following general policy: "Require appropriate land use transitions or extensive buffering between low density residential areas and high density residential and non residential areas ". The historic use of the subject property as a church has provided a buffer between the low Findings, Decisions Steve Williams , Page 5 density residential to the north and the high density office development to the-south-of the subject property. DECISION: The proposed rezoning is hereby denied. The above decision is made for the following: 1. The proposed rezoning is in conflict with the land use map and the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The development of the site for office use would remove the buffer recommended by the Plan. 2. The subject property was developed and was used for church purposes which tend to be off -peak traffic generators. Rezoning the property to POD -1, Planned Office District, would allow the development of office use on the property. A significant portion of traffic generated from office use is during the morning and evening peak traffic periods. Existing traffic conditions in the vicinity are currently the worst during the morning and evening peak periods. CITY OF EDINA THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION O STEVE WILLIAMS FOR REZONING OF ROPERTY AT 5015 WEST 70TH STREET DRAFT FINDINGS ' DEC ION, The abov ntitled matter was heard before the City Council ity of Edina, on September 18, October 16, and ember 6, 1995. Steve Williams (the " roponent") and his architect Ed Kodet were present. The ' Council, having heard all of a facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, his architect, city tall, and property and having heard and reviewed a evidence representative, city staff, and property o ers, ay, hereby makes the following: _y 1►I � I► ��7_� 1I:��T1� awn s in the vicinity of the subject rezoning i d law addressed by the Proponent, his being fully advised, after due consideration, 1. The Proponent, on Au st 16, 1996, submitted an pplication for rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Uni District to POD -1, Planned Offi District for a 2.9 acre tract of land located at 50 5 West 70th Street. The property is de eloped with a building and other improve ents which were used as a church. Accordin to the application for rezoning an city records, the owner of the property is the North Ce tral Association of the Evan lical Free Church of America. A Mr. Dean M. Johnson signed he application for re /oning for the property owner. w LOCATIO Consent III.B. N MAP WAN loss lien son MODEM on HE I loss NONE ST. PATRIC4 ��� of �■�i� �: � ,_ 1 � t LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -95 -6 L O C A T 10 N 7115 Tupa Drive and 7020 Kerry Road EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT nte�r mn. LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -95 -6 L O C A T 10 N 7115 Tupa Drive and 7020 Kerry Road EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT w DRAFT P.C. MEETING MINUTES /11/1/95 LD -95 -6 7115 Tupa Drive and 7020 Kerry Road Johnson and Eckberg Mr. Larsen informed Commissioners the subject request involves two developed single dwelling lots. The rear portion of the Kerry lot would split off and attach to the lot on Tupa Drive. The transferred property is about 10,000 square feet in area. Both lots would continue to meet Zoning Ordinance standards. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. Mr. Mark Solstad, #87 Lee Road, Bloomington, was present representing Mr. Johnson, 7115 Tupa Drive. Mr. Solstad pointed out if one views the lots along Tupa Drive, the Johnson lot is not as deep as the majority of lots along Tupa. This acquisition of land brings this lot more into conformance with the immediate properties. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 1995 LD -95-6 7115 Tupa Drive and 7020 Kerry Road Johnson and Eckberg The subject request involves two developed single dwelling lots. The rear portion of the Kerry lot would split off and attach to the lot on Tupa Drive. The transferred property is about 10,000 square feet in area. Both lots would continue to meet Zoning Ordinance standards. Staff recommends approval. i; 1 , Ai)-I Q V a. Y • wlaals 1ua.stN aoonlo■ ar•� ■ r,.r ar / ■d r V l aa.OV[Ci 1■i3..ora ■ a■ rrr /� ar�1 �FRRY 0 1 r Dre I a. ae■Taa LSmrail //fNAmITP1ra -` Immr ■W I rwoa.acr la.a mw ■w.�rar a.r hoall Va.NIOfRCt.a1a.am.�aar rr4ao. --..l, FAU a■dal Immr■rua A m o ■ m r 1. O • n.+.. ■-■tea r■ 1 O •O -idaa r arr P a .,� O�c RDa tea■. ■1alAw A,arr smr,�,wr■.a1mw r.1y► u 3.a1■/a■ILIwIw � rye~ ya�urv.+R w.MLina7aFM.mrFr IPw ago- n• MC{ M 1 ■A01 REVISIONS CERTIFICATION CLIENT LOCATION L N SCNOELL t MADSON. INC. °� ""'� • "'° ° """° SCOTT W. JOHNSON EDINA, MINNESOTA .00 Dwa a.. a...M ,,,1..■.a .fam S.M I. PROJECT h. X497 -001 . � REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: November 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Z -95 -2. Preliminary Rezoning PID, Planned Industrial District to POD -1. Planned Office District. 5229 Eden Avenue. Recommendation: Agenda Item # I I I. D. F] Consent Information Only n Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Rx To Council Action nx Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date for December 19, 1995. Info /Background: The subject rezoning is for Lot 1 of the Kunz -Lewis Plat which is currently under consideration by the Council. The plat as well as the Final Development Plan for Lot 2 (Kunz) are scheduled for the December 19, 1995, meeting. As directed by Council staff has retained a planning consultant to review the plans for the area. The consultant will report his findings to the Council on December 4, 1995. TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM V A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Trees for Normandale and Braemar Golf Courses Company 1. Minnesota Valley Landscape 2. Margois Brothers 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Minnesota Valley Landscape $8,083.35 GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $8,083.35 2. $8,730.00 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ Budget Acct No: 0670 -4558 & 0664 -4558 This is for purchase, delivery and planting of six 14' -16' Colorado Blue Spruce, four 5 " -6" Ash, four 5 " -6" Linden, and four 5 " -6" Maple trees for Braemar and Normandale Golf Courses. The trees are primarily for the purpose of creating safety barriers. All trees have a one year warranty. The Recommended Bid is within budget Park and Recreation not within budoe- n Wallin finance Director Kenneth Rdsland, City Maryager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 6 November, 1995 AGENDA ITEM V . B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Handrail for Path Connecting Parklawn to Centennial Lakes Park Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Accu -Fab Steel Works, Inc. 1. $ 5,832.00 2. Maertens - Brenny Construction Co. 2. $ 10,950.00 3. Lewis Engineering Co. 3. $ 14,280.00 4. Shaw - Lundquist Associates, Inc. 4. $ 16,150.00 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Accu -Fab Steel Works, Inc. $ 5,832.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an additional rail being added to the path connecting Parklawn to Centennial Lakes Park. This purchase will be funded through special asslessment as part of the Parklawn project. The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Public Works - Enaineerino De artment nZKen-4nager et n, Finance Director 0 TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: November 1, 1995 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Media Lab equipment for the Edina Art Center Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Hennepin County 1. $8,000 2. 2. $ 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hennepin County $8,000 (only supplier) GENERAL INFORMATION: As stated in the attached letter from James Van Valkenburg, Chairman of the Edina Art Center Board, the Edina Art Center Board is requesting the Edina City Council's support to purchase the Southdale- Hennepin Area Library's used media equipment. Also, attached is the history and proposal regarding the Edina Art Center Media Lab Project (pink copies). All of the used media equipment proposed for purchase is listed (beige copies). It is recommended that funding come from the Communications The Recommended Bid is ly within budget not withiq bud,it neth Rosland, City Manager Director 4 JAMES VAN VALKENBURG 4204 Philbrook Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 922 -2982 November 1, 1995 Mayor Fred Richards & Members of the Couniil Re: Edina Art Center Media Lab Project Ladies and Gentlemen: On your agenda for Nov 6,1995 is a recommendation from the Edina Art Center Board of Directors urging your suppogt for the proposed media center. Diana Hedgers memo(attached) spells out more detail than I can. Art Dickey has gone over all the equipment and believes that the County is offering to sell at much less than market value/ . This will fill a void in the Art Center program and willfill a void created by the closing of the department by Henn County. It will also be profitable which will help the Art Center on its profit and loss statement. Diana has worked hard on thnis proposal and investigating and research & it looks like a winner to me. When I return we will try and refine the numbers more for all our benefit. We have discussed this with Ken Rosland and he is supportive & can answer any questions. If you need more from me, I'll respond when I return. Thanx for looking at our proposal. Sincerely, j.van v, current chair of Art Center Board Edina Art Center Media Lab Project A. History On September 1, 1995 the 22. year old Southdale- Hennepin Area Library media Laboratory closed its doors to the public due to budget cuts. The lab was spending $150,000 per year paying three audio visual technologists and equipment expenses. The services were free to the public. The lab was in constant use. The staff only allowed patrons to book six weeks in advance and were always booked. The overwhelming response of the public at Library Board Meetings was a plea not to close the lab. The general consensus from the users is that they are willing to pay a user fee to have access to this equipment. B. Edina Art Center Proposal To create a smaller version of the Library Lab; large enough to bring in the necessary revenue and still remain affordable for the public. C. Benefits to the Edina Art Center I know that this project would benefit the Edina Art Center by: _ A. Utilizing a seldom -used classroom. We could reschedule some of the class times and have some classes meet at Arneson Park. B. Raise awareness of other classes, gallery, supply area, and gift shop. _ C. Bring in more revenue to the facility. _ D. Increase the use of the Art Center by the teenage population by offering technical and artistic use of video /film. We seem to "lose" this age group and I know that this would interest them. We already have a group of high school students who are interested in this area. E. Carry out our mission to be a premier Art Center. F. "Get into the nineties" by offering instruction in video /film which is offered at all major art schools. . G. Create the Video/Film division that we have been discussing for the last year. 4 D. Equipment* "See- attached list of items Video Production, Darkroom, Photography, Audio Production, Film Production, Slide Production, and Graphics. The Hennepin County Library Board has proposed a total of $8,000. This is an excellent price for this equipment. Original price is estimated to be at more than $50,000. Art Dickey has looked at the equipment and it appears to be in good working order and believes that the price that they are asking is much less than fair market value. The wiring for the room has been estimated at $1,500. This may be able to be done "in- house" at a reduced rate. E. Proposed Open Lab Hours 30 hours per week to begin with. F. Classes We now offer at least four classes per session in darkroom, camera operation, composition, photo tinting, and other aspects of photography. With the addition of the media lab, our student population would increase. G. Budget* Preliminary total Expenses per month: $1,600 Preliminary total Revenue: $2,500 Profit is $900 per month or $10,800 per year. Note these figures are estimates and subject to change We could have a residendnon- resident fee or a member /non - member fee H. Endorsement On Thursday, October 26, 1995, the Edina Art Center Board overwhelmingly supported this project. I. Accessibility I believe that the only major drawback of the proposal is that the upstairs site is not accessible to people in wheelchairs. I do, however, believe that we can make reasonable accommodations by asking that anyone needing to use equipment or attend classes let us know so that we can set up equipment in an accessible area. Please call me anytime if you need additional information or have any questions. 929 -4555 at the Art Center or 920 -5856 home. Diana Hedges, Director ,Edina Art Center Video Production NCL # Manufacturer Name & Model # 0001 0721 Panasonic AG -180 VHS Camcorder 00010723 Panasonic AG =B3A Battery Charger 00020046 Hitachi V -3100 VHS Camcorder 00020047 RCA CPSO4 Battery Charger 00020225 Panasonic AG -1240 VHS Recorder /Player 00026171 Bogen 3140 Video Tripod 00026172 Bogen 3140 Video Tripod 00032294 Panasonic AG -B3A Battery Charger 00032295 Sony SL -300 Beta Videocassette Recorder 00036473 Panasonic WJ -5600 Effects Generator /Switcher 00043658 Sony VP -5000 U -Matic Player 0.0048103 Sony VP -5000 U -Matic Player 00052587 JVC TM -22 Video Monitor 00052916 Sony SLO -383 Beta Video Recorder 00052964 Videotek RM -15 TV /Monitor 00052977 Bogen 3056 Tripod Dolly 00052979 JVC CX -60US Video Monitor 10040311 Sony SVO -1410 VHS Recorder /Player 10062091 Panasonic AG -W1 MultiFormat VHS Recorder /Player 10062092 Elmo EV -368 Video Presenter Also: Batteries for the Panasonic AG -180 VHS camcorder, 6 ea. Darkroom HCL # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00015740 Nikon Nikkor 135mm Enlarging Lens 00032320 Time- O -Lite M -72 Timer 00036400 Arkay 16x20 Print Washer 00036465 Arkay A -25 Print Dryer 00052966 Omega D5V -XL Enlarger 00078344 Technal Al Print Dryer 00078378 Omega B66 -XL Enlarger 1004J149 Beseler Universal 20 Easel 52501354 Gralab 300 Timer Also: safelights, 2ea; print trays (assorted sizes), 21ea; contact printers, 2ea; Speed Easels (assorted sizes). 6ea; 4x5 developing tanks w/6 film hangers, 3 ea; 11 x14 easels, 3ea; multiformat easel, lea; stainless & plastic processing tanks, 4 ea; stainless & plastic processing reels for 35mm & 2 1/4 film, 10ea; negative washer, 1 ea; graduates, 3 ea; print tongs, 4 ea; Magna- sighl,i ea. Also: SmithViclor scoop lights, 4 ea; Seamless backdrop paper for Cambo shooting table; Polarizing filter for photo lights 2 Photography HCL # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00010724 Nikon F3 35mm Camera 00020253 Mamiya 135mm "4.5 lens 00032103 Nikon Micro - Nikkor 55mm "2.8 Lens 00034294 Mamiya Grip Holder 00034295 Mamiya Prism Viewfinder 00034296 Mamiya 80mm "2.8 lens 00034297 Mamiya C -330S 2 1/4 Twin Lens Camera 00036401 Bogen 3010 Photo Tripod 00036403 Bogen 3010 Photo Tripod 00036433 Bowens Illumitron 3 -C 00052589 Lowell TI -92M Light Kit 00052926 Nikon Nikkor 50mm "1.4 lens 00078308 Prinz 402 Camera Case 00078045 Media Lab 3'x8' Light Table 00078284 Bogen TC -1 Copystand 10040151 Cambo Shooting Table 10041858 Nikon FM -2 35mm Camera Also: SmithViclor scoop lights, 4 ea; Seamless backdrop paper for Cambo shooting table; Polarizing filter for photo lights 2 Also: Bookshelf speakers, 2 ea. Film Production HCL # Audio Production HCL # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00023797 ElectroVoice 635A Microphone 00031873 ElelroVoice 635A Microphone 00034243 Yamaha KX -500 Audiocassette Recorder 00039266 JVC Stereo Turntable 00052713 Teac MB -20 Meter Bridge 00052727 Tascam 2A Audio Mixer 00052955 Harmon Kardon HK 3801 Stereo Receiver 00052957 Omega 55 /EX Speaker 00052958 Omega 55 /EX Speaker 00052985 Allas PB -1X Mic Stand w/ PSC -3 Boom 00052986 Allas PB -1X Mic Stand w/ PSC -3 Boom 0- 0087761 Soundcraftsman RP -2212 Audio Equalizer 00087764 Soundcraftsman RP -2212 Audio Equalizer 00087787 Marantz 1070 Stereo Amplifier 10006540 Sony ECM -44B Microphone 10062004 Tascam 103 Stereo Audiocassette Recorder 52500446 Sony TC -280 Reel /Reel Audio Recorder Also: Bookshelf speakers, 2 ea. Film Production HCL # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00020050 Canon 518 Super 8mm Camera 00026372 Elmo ST -180 Sound Super 8mm Projector 00036261 Elmo ST -180E Sound Super 8mm Projector 00036471 Telex 2210 16mm Projector 00050961 Elmo K -110SM Dual 8mm Projector 00087759 Sankyo XL -60S Sound Super 8mm Camera 00087762 Eiki RT -2 16mm Projector 50001878 Craig 16mm Film Editor Also: Dual 8mm film editors, 2 ea. 3 Slide Production 1 L # Manufacturer Name & Model # 0001 9909 Recordex 2870AV SlideSync Cassette Recorder 00020221 Sharp RD -685AV SlideSync Recorder 00020223 Arlon 2PIus Keyboard /Programmer 00026178 Arion 2PIus Dissolve Unit 00026380 Recordex 2870AV SlideSync Cassette Recorder 00039326 Arion 2PIus Keyboard /Programmer 00039327 Arlon 2PIus Dissolve Unit 00050921 Telex 3120 Slide Projector 00052671 Telex 3120 Slide Projector 00052680 Kodak E -2 Slide Projector 00052681 Kodak E -2 Slide Projector 00087691 Kodak AF -2 Slide Projector 50001133 Kodak AF -2 Slide Projector 50200245 Kodak Af -2 Slide Projector 51700117 Kodak AF -2 Slide Projector 52500004 Kodak AF -2 Slide Projector 52500009 Kodak AF -2 Slide Projector 52500035 Wollensak 2550AV SlideSync Recorder Also: Kodak stack loader, 1 ea; Projector Stackers, 2 ea. Graphics H L # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00020255 Da -Lite 12400 Vu -Lyte Opaque Projector 00052972 Artograph DB300 Projector 50000539 Beseler 12300 Opaque Projector Other H L # Manufacturer Name & Model # 00043660 Dukane 28A81A Filmstrip Projector 00039224 Sportcase Camera Case 00039225 Sportcase Camera Case 50001 130 Biltco Weather Master Camera Case 4 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO; Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: November 2, 1995 AGENDA ITEM v • D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement- of kitchen cabinets, drawers and Company countertops at Fire Station Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Andersen Cabinet 1. $9,566.00 2. Lehmann Woodworks 2. $15,350.00 3. B.C. Kitchen Cabinets 3. $11,885.00 '4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED. QUOTE OR BID: Andersen Cabinet $9,566.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: The original cabinets, drawers and countertops are 25 years old. Cabinets and drawers have been repaired several times. Additional work on current cabinets is not cost effective. City - Capital Plan; Fire Department Facilities Repair Plan would provide the necessary fuv41jng -fad this project. FIRE Signature Department The Recommended bid is within budget not withirybet n Wolin,_Finan4 Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 3, 1995 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Storm drain system for Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Perkins Landscape 1. $7,595 2. Glenn Rehbein 2. $7,600 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Budget Acct No: 0027 -4306 Perkins Landscape $7,595 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the installation of a storm drain system for #1 fairway at Braemar Golf Course. Grading and sodding will take place in the spring. The Recomme d is Y within budget not within Kenneth Park and Recreation Department . nd, City IVF n*ger Director TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DEBRA MANGEN CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1995 SUBJECT: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION PUBLIC HEARING - BEER AND WINE LICENSE FEES Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.I. A Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That Council set a hearing date of December 19, 1995, to consider an increase in wine and beer license fees. Info /Background: Minnesota Statute 340A.408, Subd. 3a provides that no city shall increase the fee for a liquor license except after notice and hearing on the proposed increase. This provision applies to on -sale win and beer license fees. Staff is proposing an increase in the on -sale wine and beer license fees to capture increased staff costs. Affected licensees will be sent notices as required by statute. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DEBRA MANGEN CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1995 SUBJECT: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 1996 COUNCIL MEETING DATES Recommendation: Agenda Item # V I. B. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve the 1996 Council Meeting Schedule as presented. Info /Background: Council meeting dates in January, February and September of 1996 fall on holidays. The following schedule is recommended, and follows previous years' practices. January TUESDAY, JANUARY 2 (Monday, January 1 is New Years Day) TUESDAY, JANUARY 16 (Monday, January 15 is Martin Luther King Day) February TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20 (Monday, February 19 is Presidents' Day) September TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3 (Monday, September 2 is Labor Day) s it REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL I Agenda Item # V I. C. FROM: DEBRA MANGEN CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1995 SUBJECT: NEW WINE/BEER LICENSE - NEW HONG KONG KITCHEN Recommendation: Consent x❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends Action ❑ To HRA x❑ To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Council approve issuance of an on sale Wine and 3.2 Beer License to the New Hong Kong Kitchen. Info /Background: Pursuant to City Code Section 900, wine and beer licenses require approval by the Council before issuance. The Police Department has approved an application for on sale wine and beer for the New Hong Kong Kitchen at 3335 Hazelton Road. This is not a new establishment, however, it is under new ownership so they require a new license. Attached is Deputy Chief Siitari's memo stating the findings of the background investigation along with his recommendation for approval. The applicant has filed all the necessary paperwork and their file is in order. The license is being placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. r CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT �1 ZOZz_,P KI DATE: OCTOBER 24,1995 TO: KENNETH ROSLAND FROM: MICHAEL J. SIITARI SUBJECT: ON SALE WINE LICENSE The on -sale wine license and 3.2 beer license application of the below listed establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: NEW HONG KONG KITCHEN 3335 Hazelton Rd. Edina, MN 55435 The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and issuance of an on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license for the establishment. MICHAEL SIITARI DEPUTY CHIEF OF POLICE MJS:mwn t� CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT �I •z -1.101 I DATE: OCTOBER 24,1995 TO: MICHAEL J. SIITARI FROM: MICHAEL NIBBE SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE The on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license application of the below listed establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: NEW HONG KONG KITCHEN 3335 Hazelton Road Edina, MN 55435 The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Included with this memo is a one page summary of the investigation. Sgt. Michael Nibbe EDINA POLICE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION NEW HONG KONG KITCHEN 3335 HAZELTON RD. EDINA, MN 55435 On October 6, 1995 New Hong Kong Inc. made application to the City of Edina for an on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license. New Hong Kong Inc. submitted the required documents for the application process and paid the license fees. I have reviewed the forms and found them to be satisfactory. New Hong Kong Inc. is incorporated in Minnesota. The date of incorporation was 3/24/95 and its corporate charter number is 8Q- 162. The corporation is entirely owned by Guang Cai Ma and the New Hong Kong Kitchen will be run by him. He currently resides at 2650 Scotland Ct. #102 in Moundsview MN. He has applied to be a wine manager and was found to be in compliance and have no criminal history. Personal and business references were contacted and responded in a positive manner. The following areas were checked: 1) Better Business Bureau 2) Secretary of State 3) BCA criminal histories 4) Hennepin and Ramsey Warrants 5) Moundsview Police Department 6) St. Paul Police Departments Asian Gang /Crime Unit 7) Hennepin County Civil Filings No negative contacts were found with any of these agencies. This is not a franchise but solely owned and operated by Mr. Ma. The Police Department has supportive documents on file with the application should the Council wish to review the information. �� Sgt. Mich el Nibbe Investigative Division REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI.D FROM: Francis Hoffman , I Consent EJ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 6 November, 1995 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Imp. No. BA -309 - W. 66th St. from France to York Imp. No. BA -311 -York from W. 66th St. to W. 69th St. Recommendation: © To Council Action © Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date of November 20, 1995 for public hearing on preliminary plan approval of Hennepin County plans regarding reconstruction of W. 66th Street and York Avenue on the north and east sides of Southdale Shopping Center' respectively. Info /Background: Hennepin County has developed reconstruction plans for W. 66th Street from France to York and on York Avenue from W. 66th to W. 69th Street. Hennepin County has held one open house plan review session in the Southdale Library for interested persons during September. The public hearing at the City Council would be to review the preliminary plans and allow for public input at the City level. Also at this hearing, the Council could act on approving the preliminary plans and approve the projects with intent to special assess a portion of the two projects against abutting properties. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plans and determined the projects to be feasible. AGENDA ITEM: VI.E. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: November 2, 1995 RE: Proposed Revenue Bonds for Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services The City has received a request from Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services ( "Fairview ") that the City issue tax - exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.165, to finance cardiac imaging equipment to be installed at Fairview Southdale Hospital. The City has previously issued revenue bonds under this authority on behalf of Fairview to finance improvements to the Hospital. State and federal law require that prior to issuing the bonds the City hold a public hearing on the proposed financing. The bonds are proposed to be issued in the principal amount not in excess of $2,900,000, and Fairview anticipates that the bonds will be issued in the form of a single note which will be purchased by a bank. The debt service on the bonds will be payable solely from payments to be made by Fairview, and the City will not have any liability with respect to the bonds. Fairview will pay all City expenses with respect to the bonds, and upon issuance of the bonds will pay the City a fee equal to 1/2 of 1% of the principal amount of the bonds in accordance with the City's guidelines for issuance of revenue bonds. If the City Council wishes to proceed with the issuance of the bonds it should adopt a resolution setting a public hearing on the bonds for the December 4th City Council meeting. Following the hearing the terms of the bonds would be presented to the Council for approval. Representatives from Fairview will attend the November 6th City Council meeting to respond to any questions concerning the proposed project and bonds. JPG:cmn DORSEY & WHITNEY P.L.L.P. Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Semices rmj 00 coo October 26, 1995 Mr. Kenneth Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ken: 2450 Riverside Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55454 -1395 612-6672 -6300 Fax 612- 672 -6303 Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services ( "Fairview ") will soon be acquiring $2,826,560 worth of Philips Medical Systems cardiac imaging equipment to expand and upgrade radiological imaging services offered at Fairview Southdale Hospital. Fairview generally finances imaging equipment with taxable leases. However, the size of this transaction and the large variance between taxable and tax exempt interest rates results in significant savings to Fairview Southdale Hospital if the financing is accomplished with tax exempt funds issued through the City of Edina (the "City "). The debt is anticipated to be issued in the form of a Tax Exempt Revenue Note(s) and placed with one of three local banks currently offering proposals to provide the necessary funds. If possible, Fairview would like to be placed on the November 6 City Council agenda to present this proposal. If the City determines to proceed with the request, the next step would be for the City to schedule a public hearing on the proposal. If the City consents to the issuance of the Note(s), Fairview will reimburse the City for all out of pocket expenses and pay the issuance fees as required per the City's tax exempt financing policies. Representatives from Fairview will be in attendance at the November 6 meeting to answer any questions the City Council may have concerning this request. Sincerely, Mark M. Enger Senior Vice President and Administrator Fairview Southdale Hospital MME/sn JUSERAP"IUPMROSUW DATR RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE SERVICES UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals 1.1. Representatives of Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview ") has advised this Council of its desire to undertake a project consisting of the acquisition and installation by Fairview of cardiac imaging equipment in Fairview Southdale Hospital which is located at 6401 France Avenue South in the City and is owned and operated by Fairview. 1.2. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act "), to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue - producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services, including hospitals. Fairview has requested the City to issue its revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a revenue note) in an aggregate total amount not to exceed $2,900,000 (the "Bonds ") to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Project. SECTION 2 Public Hearing 2.1. Section 469.154, Subdivision 4 of the Act requires that prior to submission of an Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development requesting approval of the Project as required by Section 469.154, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to the issuance of the Bonds, this Council approve the Bonds and the Project, after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project is hereby called and shall be held on December 4, 1995, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall. 2.2 The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once not less than fourteen (14) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. The notice to be published shall be in substantially the following form: -2- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE SERVICES AND THE ISSUANCE OF HEALTH SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152- 469.165 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), will meet on December 4, 1995, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, in the City, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue revenue bonds, in one or more series, under the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, in order to finance all or a portion of the costs of a project on behalf of Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Fairview "). The proposed project will consist of the acquisition and installation by Fairview of cardiac imaging equipment in Fairview Southdale Hospital which is located at 6401 France Avenue in the City and is owned and operated by Fairview. The maximum aggregate principal amount of the proposed bond issue is $2,900,000. The bonds will be limited obligations of the City, and the bonds and interest thereon will be payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof. No holder of any bonds will ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except money payable by the Fairview to the City and pledged to the payment of the bonds. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development for approval of the project, together with draft copies of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk during business hours, 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M., on normal business days. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set forth above. Dated: November 6, 1995. -3- BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL By s /Debra Mangen City Clerk 2.3. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, together with draft copies of all attachments and exhibits thereto, are hereby ordered placed on file with the City Clerk and shall be available for public inspection, following publication of the notice of public hearing, between during normal business hours, 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M., on normal business days. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina on this 6th day of November, 1995. Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) -4- Mayor A. o e ItA REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 1 IB B TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # WE FROM: John Keprios ❑x Consent Director Edina Park and Recreation Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: November 1, 1995 Q To Council SUBJECT: Edina Aquatic Center filter Action 0 Motion room repair ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Edina Park Board recommends that the Edina City Council authorize Developer's Fund resources to repair the Edina Aquatic Center filter room. Info /Background: Edina Aquatic Center filter room is in need of major repair. Professionals in the field of pool maintenance recommend that the filtration equipment, which includes filters, chemical controls, piping, pumps, heaters and valves need to be replaced prior to the opening of the 1996 swimming season. According to pool maintenance professionals, due to the age and design of the Edina Aquatic Center filter room, many of the mechanical components of the filtration system may not be operational through the 1996 summer season. The Aquatic Center filter room is currently part of the General Park Improvement, Special Election Bond Issue. However, it is the Edina Paris Board's recommendation that the repairs should be made prior to the beginning of the 1996 outdoor swimming season. The Developer's Fund balance as of November, 1995, is $426,965. It is anticipated that the filter room repairs will cost approximately $207,000. If the Park Improvement Bond issue passes, the Developer's Fund will be reimbursed for the cost of the project. If approved by the Edina City Council, the project will immediately be designed and sent out for bid. This major repair will ensure that the Edina Aquatic Center facility will be operational for the 1996 season. TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland DATE: November 6, 1995 SUBJECT: RIDING SCRUBBER REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VI.G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: PURCHASE OF RIDING SCRUBBER Background: A riding scrubber is needed to maintain park pathways and Centennial Lakes walking areas. This past year, we looked at a riding scrubber to be purchased for maintenance of paths and public walkways at Centennial Lakes. Because of the goose population in the City, it has become quite apparent that we truly need to maintain and scrub walking paths at other parks. Mother Nature does not seem to do a good job of scrubbing these pathways, and people are therefore constantly dodging various animal and bird droppings. A scrubber of this nature costs approximately $18,000. I would recommend that we write specifications and bid a scrubber during this winter so that it would be available to us at the first crack of spring. I would recommend that the scrubber be purchased through Centennial Lakes park funds, equipment replacement funds and contingencies- - one third from each account. If you have the opportunity to walk the park paths or Centennial Lakes walkways, I am sure you will be aware of the situation and that it continues to grow. REPORURECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Susan Wohlrabe DATE: November 6, 1995 SUBJECT: SET 1996 DATES FOR ANNUAL MEETING & VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION Recommendation: Agenda Item VI.H. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That the City Council select either Wednesday, March 13th, or Wednesday, March 20th, as the date for the Council's Annual Meeting with Boards and Commissions to be held at Braemar Clubhouse at 6 PM. Spring break in 1996 is March 29th to April 9th. This event was last held at Centennial Lakes. and That the City Council select either Tuesday, April 23rd, or Wednesday, April 24th, as the date for the Volunteer Recognition Reception at Edinborough Park at 5 PM. National Volunteer Week in 1996 begins on April 21st. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DEBRA MANGEN CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1995 SUBJECT: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION PETITION FOR STREET LIGHTING - INTERSECTION OF BROOKVIEW, OAKLAWN & 52ND ST. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V II. A. Consent ❑x Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion To refer the petition for street lighting of the Brookveiw, Oaklawn and 52nd Street intersection to the Engineering Department for processing. Info /Background: The attached petition requesting street lighting at the Brookview, Oaklawn and 52nd Street intersection was received from the residents in'the 5200 block of Oaklawn. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. (over) ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER OSTREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING W!TH CURB AND GU11712R To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGN,pTURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) NA Nye, l w aMa ry -nq-�r PROPERTY ADDRESS .5-2:5 z �),& ".,/ _5 ,u COX La,,vn A ✓e S S� 2 7' l 2 i�le lev" OWNER'S PHONE lZ 7 -a yid 9q q�L`7 �5CL 9j,o - 5ZZ4 nrZ6 - eo / Z This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1980 ��. rc. U fff'' OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) NA Nye, l w aMa ry -nq-�r PROPERTY ADDRESS .5-2:5 z �),& ".,/ _5 ,u COX La,,vn A ✓e S S� 2 7' l 2 i�le lev" OWNER'S PHONE lZ 7 -a yid 9q q�L`7 �5CL 9j,o - 5ZZ4 nrZ6 - eo / Z This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1980 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 1995 SUBJECT: LETTER FROM VERNE PHELPS Recommendation: Agenda Item # VIH.A. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑X To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A letter was received from Verne Phelps, 3400 Parklawn Avenue #312, dated October 29, 1995, asking consideration from a number of Edina Organizations as well as the Council proposing cooperative tree planting. Staff will review the letter further and bring back a response to the Council at the November 20, 1995, meeting. do .k 3400 P EO1NA�MN 55435 � ►2 (612) a35 -9597 October 29, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn 55424 Good morning! AGENDA ITEM N0. VIII. A. I'd like to ask your approval of the following proposal: On Good FRiday, April 5, 1996, to plant a clump of four Tamrack small trees in two locations in Edina. The one location is on the west side of Metro Boulevard and a block west of 70th Street, where Niiie bile Creek is spread out a bit. I'm proposing that the plantings be around the trees that are in the center of the widened Nine Mile Creek. The second location I propose is near the south edge of the pond that is behind Good Samaritan United Methodist Church, at 5730 Grove Street. I'd like to invite Hennepin County Home School to allow two volunteer residents to actually do the planting, with their Supervisor or Supervisors. It would be great if we could have our girl and one boy to be our volunteer planters. Then, on the following Sunday, Easter Sunday, I'd like to have the volunteer planters and Supervisor to join me in attending Good Samaritan United Methodist Church service. If weather conditions or any reason that the planting date or Church Service should scheduled for later date, we can act with accordingly. The Tamrack is a Conifer which is well adapted to thrive in a wet area or where it may be temporarily flooded. While it is green as evergreens, it's needles change to golden color about November 1st, then regain_ the green color in spring. If this proposal meets your approval, please indicate with your signatureso and return to me in self- addressed envelope. Hennepin County Home School The Edina City Council The Nine Mile Creek District Board Good Samaritan United Methodist Church Ve y incerely yours,, 0 - �� Verne 0. Phelps Flk> r, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND DATE: NOVEMBER 6,1995 SUBJECT: LETTER RECEIVED FROM BERNADETTE O'CONNOR Report: Agenda Item # VIII.B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A letter was received on October 30, 1995, from Bernadette O'Connor, 4145 Parklawn Avenue, #229, and signed by twenty-four neighbors. The letter (attached) asked that the "walk" signal on the intersection lights on France Avenue be extended. Staff directed the letter to the Traffic Safety Committee to be heard at their November 7, 1995, meeting. Additionally, Hennepin County has been notified of the letter. 0 A �. TI Police and rescue squads were called to the scene at about 11:50 a.m. Thursday. The person who drove the car is Edina City Council cooperating with investigators. Edina, MN. Drevlowsaid. Dear Council People: Some time aao citizens of Parklawn Avenue asked for more time on the "walk" signal on the intersection lights on France Ave. Thev were told that France Avenue was not made for pedestrians. The current "walk" si rnal can barely Fret us to the center island. Many of us on this avenue no longer drive and use the services provided at Centennial Park. We need more time to cross France Avenue on foot. Will it take another accident such as the above before we Fret it ? ? ? ? ? ?? l ' Sincerely, , Bernadette O'Connor 4145 Parklawn Ave #229 Edina, MN 55435 >7 Q- Q,L -/_ Richfield woman:! hit by car dies 1... . South on We kept on walking ,.- A Richfield woman died Thursday after being struck by a car while true y a France, where a guy driving a red BMW nearly clipped us. crossing an intersection in Edina, "We should have let him hit police said. us," said Zahradnik. "Guy driving Lorraine Stokes. 41, died at Fair - a car like that must have some . view Southdale Hospital in Edina a money. He hits us, we'd have - short time after the accident at money, too." France and Parklawn Avs.. Edina I - ' " ' - police Sgt. Jerry Drevlow said. Police and rescue squads were called to the scene at about 11:50 a.m. Thursday. The person who drove the car is Edina City Council cooperating with investigators. Edina, MN. Drevlowsaid. Dear Council People: Some time aao citizens of Parklawn Avenue asked for more time on the "walk" signal on the intersection lights on France Ave. Thev were told that France Avenue was not made for pedestrians. The current "walk" si rnal can barely Fret us to the center island. Many of us on this avenue no longer drive and use the services provided at Centennial Park. We need more time to cross France Avenue on foot. Will it take another accident such as the above before we Fret it ? ? ? ? ? ?? l ' Sincerely, , Bernadette O'Connor 4145 Parklawn Ave #229 Edina, MN 55435 >7 Q- Q,L -/_ L Cc>w i 1 - Co LAI . V 1 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DEB MANGEN, CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 1995 SUBJECT: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FROM AMY.NYMARK Report: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VIII.C. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A letter was directed to the Council from Amy Nymark, 5604 Sherwood Avenue, dated October 24, 1995, (copy attached). She represents her neighbors from Sherwood Avenue. The concerns were the amount as well as the speed of traffic to and from the Community Center and their request for signage in various areas of the neighborhood. The request was given to Craig Swanson Traffic Safety Coordinator and will be on the Traffic Safety Committee agenda November 7, 1995. October 24, 1995 City Council of Edina 4801West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council, I'm representing neighbors from Sherwood Avenue. We are concerned about the amount as well as the speed of traffic to and from the community center. Our avenue has become an artery for people entering and exiting nearby parking areas, football festivities and community center functions. On our short Sherwood stretch from Southview Road to Lakeview Drive we have eighteen children under the age of twelve. We have mature foliage around each corner area on Lakeview as well as Wind Road. The neighborhood has endured high speed traffic and avoided near misses from each access, but feels the current conditions pose a hazard. We are requesting yellow children yield signs posted at all accesses to Sherwood as well as stop signs on the corners of Wind and Sherwood facing east, and the Lakeview site heading south towards the community center. A signed petition from our neighborhood will be available to you upon your request. Please inform me of what measures will or will not be instituted. Thank You, U UU Amy Nymark 5604 Sherwood Avenue Edina, MN 55424 929 -8986 /4L TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland DATE: November 6, 1995 SUBJECT: SHeRPA'S FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IX.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑X Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Background: Attached please find summary sheets regarding the Family Services Collaborative (FSC) as well as the grant for the FSC that has been forwarded to the State and approved. I will be able to answer questions regarding this material at the November 6th Council Meeting. SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA The services systems — be it health care, human services, employment and training, corrections or welfare — are undergoing significant change and restructuring, resulting in integrated service systems. Underlying some of these changes is the reduction in public funding for services that is forcing increased responsibilities on more local levels of government — county, city and school. These trends have made collaboration between organizations and communities more important than ever. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative began in March' of 1994 as part of a statewide effort to promote collaboration and integrated service systems. The Collaborative was created through a partnership between South Hennepin families, schools, cities, public health, Hennepin County, private human service providers, funders, and other community organizations serving families and children. The South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency is the lead coordinating agency for the collaborative effort. The collaborative effort in South Hennepin began with the tasks of studying the needs of families and children and developing a blueprint for an integrated service system that is: • family focused and empowering for families; • comprehensive and provides a continuum of services; • community - based; • culturally relevant; • focused on prevention and early intervention; and • built on the strengths and resources of families and communities. The studying of the issues and development of a blueprint took a little over a year to complete (from March, 1994 to June, 1995). This planning process was guided by a Steering Committee comprised of representatives from all of the partner organizations and involved over 300 people, who contributed a combined total of over 1600 volunteer hours to the collaborative planning process. There are an estimated 24,300 families with children in the four South Hennepin school districts, with a total of over 43,700 children. Teachers and other front -line staff in schools estimate that a quarter to a third (or 6,000 - 8,000) of their students are dealing with family South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 problems and may need some kind of assistance. Most, however, are not getting needed supports. All families raising children need support; it is simply too difficult for families to rear children alone. Sometimes this support comes from a natural support network of friends, relatives, or neighbors; and sometimes it comes from more formal supports such as social services. Our families are in the process of rapid change. Lifestyle choices, work place and household structure and family norms all are undergoing transformation. There has also been a corresponding transformation in the community- and family -based social support systems and institutions. Supports for families are fragmented and the lack of a natural support network can be harmful for parents who are isolated and overrun by a multitude of stresses. There are four fundamental problems limiting or preventing families from getting the supports they need. ❑ First, families and providers or other people who are trying to help families often face tremendous difficulties in finding and connecting with needed services. ❑ Second, because potential problems are more difficult to recognize in the early stages of development than in the later stages, those which could have been averted or alleviated by early intervention often go unnoticed until they escalate in seriousness. ❑ Third , once families and children do get connected to the services they need, these services are often fragmented and inflexible and, therefore, not able to meet the needs of families and children in a holistic manner. Families must often go to several different service providers each of which attempts to treat one piece of the family's problems. While many good services are in place, fragmentation makes them less effective and efficient than they could be — this is why service collaboration is so important. ❑ Finally, services are often provided in isolation from families' natural support network, limiting the strength of support a family might need. The inherent nature of the problems identified require solutions that address the fundamental design of the service system and that are collaborative in nature. Because services are fragmented and families receive support from more than one organization, collaboration must occur between all organizations serving families — schools, public health, county, city and community -based services. Because families live, work, go to school and socialize in more than one community, collaboration must also occur between communities. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is proposing a model for improving how services are delivered. The model is called the "South Hennepin Family Support Network ", which is a family- focused system for integrated service delivery in South Hennepin. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 2 The startup phase of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative will focus on three priorities 1) the development of the proposed South Hennepin Family Support Network, 2) the collaborative governance model of the Family Services Collaborative and 3) the localization and integration of Hennepin County services in South Hennepin. The proposed Family Support Network for South Hennepin families and children is designed to: 1. systematically identify and deal with family problems as they emerge; 2. increase access and simplify the process of linking families and children to needed supports; 3. integrate these supports into a continuum of care that will result in a more holistic and successful resolution of these problems; and 4. help families strengthen their natural support networks (e.g. relatives, friends, -neighbors,-religious- organizations); — - - - - - -- -- -- - - 5. provide a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of integrated family services. The Family Support Network will be formed as a collaborative between cities, schools, Hennepin County, and private providers serving South Hennepin. It has two main components: ► a Resource Center Network, and ► a provider affiliation formed by a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU). Refer to diagram on next page) The Resource Center Network. The Resource Center Network will be an interconnected group of up to. four local Resource Centers, where families can go or call to get connected to needed supports, and which offers a coordinated approach to addressing family issues. The local Resource Centers will be responsible for. 1) being the access point for a full range of information about available community and metropolitan resources, 2) simplifying access to services, 3) providing broad -based family assessment, 4) making referrals to a full range of supports within the community, not only traditional family services, and 5) initiating service coordination among family service providers and community supports when needed. The four centers will be linked and supported through a Support Hub, which provides the coordination of services that are more cost - efficient when done on a regional basis. These components include the service and clients information systems, common intake processes, training, specialty services such as crisis hotlines, evaluation design, and seeking funding. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 0 �a A n� N O_ O A x s, b s G7 A b A x a. SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK Affiliation of Providers Organized Through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) The MOU is an interagency agreement in which family service providers would participate. The agreement would specify guidelines and procedures for: 1. Identifying and responding to potential family problems early. 2. Taking a lead role in coordinating services for a limited number of families, including ongoing assessment, referral, and follow -up. 3. Cooperating in service teams coordinated by other organizations. 4. Forming a working partnership with the Resource Center Network for assistance with information, intake, assessment, referrals, and follow -up. 10 , , 1 Eden Prairie Edina Resource Bloomingto Center Resource Center Resource Center Richfield Resource Center Resource Center Support Hub The Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU). A Memorandum Of Understanding will be established among the local Resource Centers and community organizations, and would be an agreement to work collaboratively to 1) systematically identify and respond to family problems early, 2) integrate services for families in need of multiple supports and 3) strengthen families' natural support systems, and 4) evaluate service effectiveness. The anticipated benefits and outcomes of the Family Support Network are the following: Save families and providers time in finding appropriate services and increase access to services. 2. Increase the likelihood that problems are addressed as they emerge, with the goal of reducing the long -term need for later intervention. 3. Improve the integration of services for families in need of multiple supports. 4. Reduce the number of times a family has to tell its story and the amount of time providers spend repeating similar intake processes. 5. Reduce the number of families who are unable to connect with the supports they need. 6. Strengthen family supports. 7. Increase the ability to evaluate the success of serving families. -- - - -- 8. Provide the ability to identify gaps in services. 9. Save costs in the service system. 10. Increase the availability and accessibility of county and other services presently not easily accessible to South Hennepin residents. 2) The Governance Model of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative The Family Support Network and other components of the Family Services Collaborative will require the ongoing support and leadership of the South Hennepin communities, at both the local and regional levels. The Family Services Collaborative has proposed that: One, Community Councils be established in each South Hennepin community, comprised of representatives of the schools, cities, public health service providers, human service providers, residents, customers of services, local foundations, civic and religious organizations, local businesses and other key stakeholders. The function of the Community Councils will be to bring together all of the organizations serving families and children to jointly facilitate the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative at the local level. Where possible, the Community Councils would be established through expanding existing community -based advisory and citizen groups. Each South Hennepin community will decide how its Community Council would be formed and structured. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 5 Two, a South Hennepin Family Services Council be established to support local activities and to provide a vehicle to work together. The South Hennepin Family Services Council would allow representatives of local communities to work with their counterparts in the other South Hennepin communities and with Hennepin County to determine the common priorities which can be more efficiently addressed on a regional or subregional basis. It is proposed that the Family Services Council be formed by expanding the existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities (i.e. South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency) to include the ongoing participation of the schools and Hennepin County, rather than by creating a new entity. The anticipated benefits and outcomes of the collaborative governance structure and process include the following: 1. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of collaborative efforts at the local and regional (South Hennepin) levels. 2. Help ensure the successful implementation of the Family Support Network and other recommendations. 3. Improve communication and build relationships across family serving institutions and communities. 4. Develop a stronger and ongoing partnership between the South Hennepin communities and Hennepin County. 5. Provide a local decision making structure for the delivery of family services. A third primary area of focus of the collaborative effort during the first year of implementation is to work with Hennepin County to make its services more accessible locally and integrated with South Hennepin service providers. The proposed South Family Support Network would serve as a central vehicle for the four South Hennepin communities to work with Hennepin County and other providers in their efforts to decentralize and integrate services in South Hennepin. Ongoing evaluation will be the primary means of continuously assessing the effectiveness of the Family Support Network system. Three key areas of the collaborative effort will be evaluated:. 1) effectiveness and quality, 2) customer satisfaction, and 3) collaborative service delivery. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 6 Roles and responsibilities are outlined for the primary partner organizations of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative: the South Hennepin school districts and city governments, the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency, Hennepin County, and community -based health and human service providers. Each partner organization is asked to become a member of the Family Support Network, . assisting in its development and, upon agreement among the partners, reallocate staff and /or other existing resources to support its activities. Participation in the Memorandum Of Understanding will require reorientation of some staff hours to lead and/or participate in family support teams. In addition to participation in the Family Support Network, each partner organization is asked to participate in and support its respective Community Council and the South Hennepin Family Services Council. An underlying assumption of the Family Services Collaborative model is that there will not be significant ongoing new dollars to support it or other service redesign models. Moreover, the Family Services Collaborative considers implementation grants from the State of Minnesota to be a resource for startup costs and short-term funding. Efforts to redesign how services are provided will be accomplished primarily through reallocating and pooling existing resources among partner organizations. As such, the partners of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative are committing significant resources from their existing operations for the short- and long -term success of the Collaborative. The initial resource commitments of the collaborative partners for implementation of the Family Services Collaborative blueprint total $645,744. (The full implementation proposal includes a breakdown of the inkind resources from the various partner organizations.) The Family Services Collaborative is requesting $187,000 from the State of Minnesota for first -year implementation to supplement the resources of the collaborative partners. The implementation funds from the State of Minnesota represent approximately a third of the total potential resources of the Collaborative during the upcoming work plan period. (Refer to attached budget.) While the initial resource contributions of the collaborative partners are significant, we also recognize the need to develop creative funding strategies to sustain the Collaborative in the long term. For this reason, the first year work plan includes the development of long -term funding strategies. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 7 The following is a breakdown of projected revenues and expenses for the first year work plan period. It shows the grant and inkind resources anticipated from both the State of Minnesota and the partner organizations. As stated previously, the actual resource contributions made by the partner organizations during the first year work plan period may differ from the projected contributions depending on the actual progress made in the development of the Family Support Network. EXPENSES Staff PARTNER RESOURCES $530,236 $655,036 FSC GRANT GRANTS INKIND TOTAL REVENUES Benefits /taxes $24,960 State of MN $187,500 $187,500 School districts $117,790 $117,790 Cities $112,318 $112,318 Public Health $17,460 $17,460 SHeRPA $42,458 $42,458 Hennepin County $246,596 $246,596 Private providers $25,000 $84,122 $109,122 TOTAL INCOME $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 EXPENSES Staff $124,800 $530,236 $655,036 Salaries $99,840 Benefits /taxes $24,960 Contracted services $30,000 $2,950 $32,950 Employee in -state travel $864 $864 Computers, phone, fax equipment $16,100 $10,350 $26,450 Space and furniture $31,942 $31,942 Materials, supplies, copying, postage $11,386 $2,466 $13,852 Resource library $41,500 $41,500 Other $4,350 $25,000 $1,300 $30,650 TOTAL EXPENSES $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 INCOME - EXPENSES $0 $0 $0 $0 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implemenation Grant Proposal Submitted 9115195 8 "S South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services Bloomington o Eden Prairie o Edina o Richfield September 15, 1995 Grants Administration Team, Family Services Collaborative 550 Cedar Street, 923 Capital Square St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Grants Administration Team: Enclosed please find the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative grant proposal for the work plan period October 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. The proposal has been tentatively approved by the Interim Advisory Committee and Board and will be presented for final approval by the end of the month. Because this is the first time the South Hennepin Collaborative is seeking implementation funding, the proposal includes all of the necessary components required for a first time grant proposal. Enclosed with the proposal are a series of reports resulting from the research completed during the planning phase of the Family Services Collaborative. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is requesting a total of $187,500 for the work plan period October, 1995 through June, 1996. The requested amount is the maximum amount the South Hennepin Collaborative is eligible to receive according to your funding criteria ($250,000 prorated for 9 months). We are seeking the maximum eligible amount during the initial startup phase to cover the large upfront costs of developing the Family Services Collaborative model. We consider implementation grants from the State of Minnesota to be a resource for startup costs and short-term funding. For this reason, the partners of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative will begin to realign existing resources from the very beginning of the implementation process. The implementation funds from the State of Minnesota represent approximately a third of the total potential resources of the Collaborative during the upcoming work plan period. The partner organizations of the Collaborative have committed to a total contribution of up to $645,744 in grant and inkind resources, which will be pooled and realigned to implement the vision and goals of the Collaborative. While the initial resource contributions of the collaborative partners are significant, we also recognize the need to develop creative funding strategies to sustain the Collaborative in the long term. For this reason, the first year work plan includes the development of long -term funding strategies. Thank you for your consideration of our proposal. We appreciate the efforts of the State in supporting and providing assistance to the collaboratives and we look forward to continue working with you as the we begin implementation. Please call me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, Jeanne Massey Director, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency 5701 Normandale Road, Room 302, Edina, MN 55424 o Tel: (612) 922 -5999 Fax: (612) 922 -3081 PREVENTION & INTERVENTION INITIATIVE APPLICATION COVER SHEET FORM 1 SERVICE AREA: Use your legal name and full address. CONTACT ADDRESS: This is the fiscal agent with whom the grant agreement will be Cow Cities School district names executed. Federal employer ID #: South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human 5701 Normandale Road, Rm 302 Services Edina, MN 55424 Director or superintendent's name: Jeanne Massey Contact name: Jeanne Massey Telephone number: 612 - 922 -5999 Telephone number: 612 - 922 -5999 Male responsibility and fathering grant Fax number: 612 - 922 -3081 SERVICE AREA Project state date: October 1, 995 Project end date: June 30, 1995 Cow Cities School district names MN Tax ID # Federal employer ID #: Hennepin Bloomington Bloomington, Distict 281 136 -2778 41- 1271455 Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, District 272 Grassroots collaboration grants Edina Edina, District 273 $187,500 Male responsibility and fathering grant Richfield Richfield, District 280 FUND CATEGORY AMOUNT OF FUNDING REQUESTED Community crime and drug prevention Date: September 15, 1995 Community -based truancy action projects Community violence prevention councils Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE K -6) Grassroots collaboration grants Implementation grants for family service collaboratives $187,500 Male responsibility and fathering grant I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Director's signature: Date: September 15, 1995 Superintendent's signiture (if school district is applying) TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Summary .................................... ............................... 1 Planning Process .................................... ............................... 2 Summary of Key Issues .............................. ............................... 4 Family Services Collaborative Blueprint ............. ............................... 5 Preliminary Evaluation Plan ....................... ............................... 17 General Roles and Responsibilities of Partners ..... ............................... 23 Work Plan Narrative ............................... ............................... 27 Form 2: Work Plan ................................ ............................... 29 Form 3: Collaboration Chart ...................... ............................... 35 Integrated Fund .................................... ............................... 38 Budget Narrative ................................... ............................... 39 Form 4: Budget Request ............................ ............................... 41 Form 5: Budget Justification ........................ ............................... 42 BudgetSupplement ................................. ............................... 43 Participation Agreements ........................... ............................... 44 A - List of Steering Committee members B - List of Working Group Participants C - Participation Agreements of Partner Organizations South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal i The Family Services Collaborative Interim Advisory Committee Bloomington Karyn Arazi, Bloomington School Board Ann Boerth, resident and parent Carol Huttner, Director, Bloomington /Richfield Family Center Lorinda Pearson, Manager, Bloomington Human Services Division Eden Prairie Ada Alden, Director, Eden Prairie Family Services Peg DuBord, Eden Prairie Housing, Transportation and Human Services Commission Gretchen Durkot, Director of Special Services, Eden Prairie Public Schools Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., City Council member Fdim Nancy Atchison, resident and grandparent Nancy Delin, Coordinator, Edina Family Center Rick Beresford, resident and parent Betsy Flaten, Edina Human Relations Commission Richfield Jay Craidon, resident and parent Camillo DeSantis, Richfield Human Services Planning Council Lynda Gault, Director, Richfield Special Education Nancy Rowley, Chair, Richfield School Board Public Heallth Gayle Hallin, Director, Bloomington Public Health, also serving Edina and Richfield Other Service Providers Ronald Barnes, Storefront Youth Action Roger Grusznski, Director, South Hennepin Family and Children's Services spin County Rex Holzemer, Hennepin County Community Initiatives Margaret Lonergan, Division Manager, Children & Family Services Dept. Nathalie Pyle, United Way of the Minneapolis Area City Staff Liaisons Dennis Johnson, City of Richfield Dave Lindahl, City of Eden Prairie Barb Kleist, City of Bloomington Susan Wohlrabe, City of Edina South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal ii The Family Services Collaborative Interim Board of Directors Timothy Connors, Superintendent, Bloomington School District Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent, Edina School District Barbara Devlin, Superintendent, Richfield School District Gerald McCoy, Superintendent, Eden Prairie School District Mark Barnhardson, City Manager, Bloomington City Carl Jullie, City Manager, Eden Prairie City James Prosser, City Manager, Richfield City Kenneth Rosland, City Manager, Edina City South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal iii PROJECT SUMMARY The services systems — be it health care, human services, employment and training, corrections or welfare — are undergoing significant change and restructuring, resulting in integrated service systems. Underlying some of these changes is the reduction in public funding for services that is forcing increased responsibilities on more local levels of government — county, city and school. These trends have made collaboration between organizations and communities more important than ever. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative began in March of 1994 as part of a statewide effort to promote collaboration and integrated service systems. The Collaborative was created through a partnership between South Hennepin families, schools, cities, public health, Hennepin County, private human service providers, funders, and other community organizations serving families and children. The South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency is the lead coordinating agency for the collaborative effort. The collaborative effort in South Hennepin began with the tasks of studying the needs of families and children and developing a blueprint for an integrated service system that is: • family focused and empowering for families; • comprehensive and provides a continuum of services; • community - based; • culturally relevant; • focused on prevention and early intervention; and • built on the strengths and resources of families and communities. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative blueprint is a family- focused model for integrated service delivery in South Hennepin. Underlying the model is the belief that there will not be significant ongoing new dollars to support it or other service redesign models. Efforts to redesign how services are provided will be accomplished primarily through reallocating and pooling existing resources among partner organizations. As such, the partners of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative are committing significant resources from their existing operations for the short- and long -term success of the Collaborative. The initial resource commitments of the collaborative partners for implementation of the Family Services Collaborative blueprint total $645,744. The Family Services Collaborative is requesting $187,000 from the State of Minnesota for first -year implementation to supplement the resources of the collaborative partners. The following proposal includes an overview of the planning process, a description of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative blueprint, a first year (9 month) work plan and a projected first year budget. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal f , PLANNING PROCESS The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative began with a planning effort in March of 1994. The planning effort was designed to be a collaborative and inclusive process, with the active participation of parents, representatives from diverse organizations from all of the four South Hennepin communities and Hennepin County. The community organizations included municipal governments, school districts, public health, private human service providers, funding organizations, businesses, and religious and civic organizations. The planning process also aimed to include the involvement of people from diverse ethnic groups. All together, over 300 people contributed a minimum of 1600 volunteer hours to the collaborative planning process. The following diagram shows the stages and timeline of planning process. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative Planning Process Create Defined goals Conduct The blueprint The blueprint Steering to identify Develop Steering resulted from Research Committee to needs and the action plans Committee guide the resources. Collaborative. developed 7Define school and overall Apr `94 action plans to Apr - Sep `94 county staff and Oct `94 Nov `94 - the working policy boards planning effort. and strategies. . groups. Feb `95 Prepare the FSC blueprint Mar - May `95 Present blueprint for feedback & approval Jun - Jul `95 Created a Gathered data Defined goals Working The blueprint The blueprint Steering to identify and strategies of groups were resulted from was presented Committee to needs and the formed and the combined to key city, guide the resources. Collaborative. developed action plans school and overall action plans to developed by county staff and collaborative meet the goals the working policy boards planning effort. and strategies. . groups. for feedback and concept approval. The first step in the planning process was to develop a Steering Committee, which was responsible for guiding the overall planning process. The Steering Committee was comprised of representatives from parents, the four South Hennepin cities and schools, public health, private providers, Hennepin County and the foundation and businesses communities. Refer to Attachment A for a list of the Steering Committee members. Once the Steering Committee was established, the planning process began. The next step was to collect information about the needs of families and children in South Hennepin. The research included three main activities: South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 2 0 Focus groups (over 40 in total) held with parents, school professionals, service providers, policy makers, funders, police, religious organizations, youth, and employers from the four communities of South Hennepin. 0 A review of data and studies on trends and programs in the social service system that impact families. 0 A review of literature available on collaboration and service integration and an inventory of collaborative efforts across the nation. The findings of the research are summarized in the enclosed series of reports. The findings of the research were used to help determine the priority issues that the Family Services Collaborative would need to address. Once the priorities were set, five working groups were convened to develop strategies for addressing the priority issues. These working groups, which involved over 65 people from social services, schools, cities, and religious organizations met from December, 1994 through March, 1995. (Refer to Attachment B for a list of the working groups and their members.) Based on the strategies developed by the working groups, priority strategies were selected for phase 1 of the implementation process of the Family Services Collaborative. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 3 SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES Changing Families, Changing Communities There are an estimated 24,300 families with children in the four South Hennepin school districts, with a total of over 43,700 children. Teachers and other front -line staff in schools estimate that a quarter to a third (or 6,000 - 8,000) of their students are dealing with family problems and may need some kind of assistance. Most, however, are not getting needed supports. All families raising children need support; it is simply too difficult for families to rear children alone. Sometimes this support comes from a natural support network of friends, relatives, or neighbors; and sometimes it comes from more formal supports such as social services. Our families are in the process of rapid change. Lifestyle choices, work place and household structure and family norms all are undergoing transformation. There has also been a corresponding transformation in the community- and family -based social support systems and institutions. Not only are the number of adults in households with children declining, but a majority of parents, both single and married, are working outside of the home. The fact that most parents now work outside of the home has had a large impact on neighborhoods and communities. There are simply fewer parents at home to support each other and to help care for each other's children. The lack of a natural support network can be harmful for parents who are isolated and overrun by a multitude of stresses. In addition to the growth in the number of parents working outside of the home, a greater number and share of families with children are single parent families, either as a result of divorce or never marrying. In South Hennepin, the share of families with children headed by a single parent (1990 figures) was: Richfield, 27 %; Bloomington, 20 %; Eden Prairie, 14 %; and Edina, 14 %. The share of low- income families with children is growing in South Hennepin. Families of color and single parent families experience poverty at a higher rate than do two parent and white families. The following figures are based on census data from 1989, the latest year for which figures are available. • An average of 4.2% of families with children were living in poverty. This is up from 1979, when the average poverty rate among families with children among the four communities was less than 3 %. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 4 While 3.2% of the White population of South Hennepin were living in poverty in 1989, the numbers for people of color were much.higher with 19% of Blacks and 8.7% of Asians living below the poverty line. Children of color are especially hard hit by poverty. In Richfield, for example, 48% of the Black population and 42% of the Asian population living in poverty were children under the age of 18. Single parents and their children are disproportionately affected by poverty. Most of the families living in poverty were single parent families, resulting in an average poverty rate of 18% among single parent families living in South Hennepin. In the same year, 4.7% of all South Hennepin children lived in poverty, and 74% of these children lived in single parent homes. More families appear to have multiple problems that seem intractable, especially by the time families are dealing with a severely emotionally and behaviorally disturbed teenager. Family separation and divorce seem to underlie many of the families' problems, regardless of family income. ❑ Special Education statistics show that the number of children with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) have grown rapidly over the past decade. In the 1993/94 school year, a total of 2,906 children were in special education programs in the South Hennepin school districts. Fourteen percent of these were assessed with EBD in Edina and Eden Prairie, 24 percent in Bloomington, and 30 percent in Richfield. Teachers, social workers and religious organizations are finding that many parents do not have the skill or capacity to deal with their children and seemingly do not know where to turn for help and guidance. ❑ Along with the growth in the number of low- income families, there has been a growth in the number of families who are transient, which in turn frequently results in a lack of stability in school and in weakened community supports in general, all of which are vital to healthy family development. ❑ At the end of 1994, there were a total of nearly 1,200 South Hennepin children and adults actively receiving services from Hennepin County's Children and Family Services Department, with 550 new clients opened during the first quarter of this year. ❑ Family abuse and distress sometimes results in children running away from home. The 1993 police reports show 529 runaway youth in South Hennepin. Yet South Hennepin has only one program available for runaway and throwaway children. This program is Teens Alone, and serves only Eden Prairie. Most children are taken outside of their community to a shelter, which limits the opportunity for communities to provide appropriate supports for these children and families. In addition, there is no place for parents or children to go to "cool off" when dealing with an explosive family situation. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 5 ❑ Low - income families also face barriers of inadequate transportation, affordable child care, affordable housing, emergency financial assistance, and health care services. A 1993 report by the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency estimated that 9 percent or approximately 1,800 children aged birth to 11 in South Hennepin were in need of and eligible for child care subsidies, of which 60 percent did not have access to child care assistance. ❑ These problems are compounded for immigrant families by cultural and language barriers. The need for interpreters and informational materials in foreign languages as well as culturally appropriate services is growing and has been largely unmet in South Hennepin. Over the next decade, the teenage population will grow rapidly as the children of the baby boomers move into their adolescent years. While the rate of teenage pregnancy overall has declined over the past decade, the number of teenagers having babies has not and, thus, with the anticipated growth in the teenage population, there is likely to be an increase in the number of teenage parents in South Hennepin. Growth in the number of teenage parents will increase the need for intervention services dealing with the issue of teenage pregnancy, including the public health system, the schools, economic assistance, child care providers and peer and family support networks. Teenage pregnancy and parenthood are costly problems for communities to deal with and they require responses and services from a continuum of providers and institutions in the community. Strong and concerted efforts should be made to reduce teenage pregnancy and parenting. The South Hennepin Communities are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. This demographic change poses new challenges and opportunities for educational and human services. From 1980 to 1990, each of the four communities experienced rapid growth in populations of color. This growth will continue because populations of color are younger on average and, therefore, consist of more families with children than the White population. Their numbers should also increase due to continued in- migration. In 1990, the share of families with children comprised of families of color was as follows: Bloomington: 6.6% Eden Prairie: 3.6% Edina: 3.1% Richfield: 9.0% South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 6 Because populations of color are younger, their numbers are more highly represented in schools and other environments serving families and children than in the community as a whole. The share of students of color in the 1993/94 school year was as follows: Bloomington: 14% Eden Prairie: 5% Edina: 5% Richfield: 19% People of color in South Hennepin differ by race, ethnicity and income. According to the 1990 Census, the Asian population is larger than all other populations of color in the four communities. Language barriers are a large problem for Asian and other non native English speaking populations. Few agencies in South Hennepin have bilingual staff or staff of color. Few also have readily available translators or translated materials. Furthermore, finding professionals trained in the necessary qualifications and who speak a language other than English is difficult. In general, culturally relevant human services are extremely limited in South Hennepin, severely limiting adequate services for a growing number of families in the region. Most of the services available for immigrant populations and people of color are located in Minneapolis. The Minneapolis -based agencies providing services to people of color express the difficulties of reaching out to and serving people in suburban communities. At the same time, the share of people of color without a car is higher than that of the White population, making access to services in Minneapolis difficult. Family services are not as effective as they could be due to fundamental flaws in their design. These flaws can be grouped into four interrelated categories: 1. the difficulty of connecting people to needed and appropriate services, 2. insufficient recognition of and response to problems in their early stages, 3. fragmented services, and 4. lack of coordination between formal services and families' natural support network. Some of the biggest gaps encountered in the family services system are encountered at the entry point, or front door, to services — families and providers or other people who are trying to help families often face tremendous difficulties in finding and connecting with needed services. As a result, it is common for families, especially those in crisis and in the greatest need of help, to stop looking for the help they need and fall through the cracks in the service system. Families who are new to the service system may not even know what questions to ask when looking for assistance. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal Potential problems are more difficult to recognize in the early stages of development than in the later stages. As a result, problems which could have been averted or alleviated by early intervention often go unnoticed until they escalate in seriousness. The difficulty in attaining early intervention is compounded by the difficulty families have in connecting to appropriate services. Once families and children do get connected to the services they need, these services are often fragmented and, therefore, not able to meet the needs of families and children in a holistic manner. Families must often go to several different service providers each of which attempts to treat one piece of the family's. problems. While some very good services are in place, fragmentation makes them less effective and efficient than they could be — this is why service collaboration is so important. A fragmented system is often inflexible in meeting the individualized needs of families. Over time, providers have been asked to do more with less, and have become overwhelmed. This often results in the "It's not my job" syndrome, which is a serious barrier to meeting families' needs. In these situations, organizational needs often prevail over family needs. In addition to lack of time, front -line providers often do not have the flexibility to meet the individualized needs of families because they are restricted from doing so by eligibility requirements, rules and regulations and paperwork. Data privacy laws also limit a provider's ability to understand the full range of a family's problems and to come together with other providers to work with a family in a more holistic way. Finally, services are often provided in isolation from families' natural support network. The inherent nature of the problems identified require solutions that address the fundamental design of the service system and that are collaborative in nature. Because services are fragmented and families receive support from more than one organization, collaboration must occur between all organizations serving families — schools, public health, county, city and community-based services. Because families live, work, go to school and socialize in more than one community, collaboration must also occur between communities. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 8 THE SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE BLUEPRINT The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is proposing a model for improving how services are delivered. The startup phase of the South Hennepin Family Services ,Collaborative will -focus on the-development of the proposed South Hennepin Family Support Network and the governance model of the Family Services Collaborative. Below is a description of the proposed Family Support Network and governance model. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative has proposed the development of a Family Support Network, which is a family- focused model for integrated service delivery. The proposed Family Support Network for South Hennepin families and children is designed to: 1. systematically identify and deal with family problems as they emerge; 2. increase access and simplify the process of linking families and children to needed supports; 3. integrate these supports into a continuum of care that will result in a more holistic and successful resolution of these problems; and 4. help families strengthen their natural support networks (e.g. relatives, friends, neighbors, religious organizations); 5. provide a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of integrated family services. The Family Support Network will be formed as a collaborative between cities, schools, Hennepin County, and private providers serving South Hennepin. It has two main components: ► the Resource Center Network, and ► a provider affiliation formed by a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOL>). The Resource Center Network. The Resource Center Network will be an interconnected group of up to four local Resource Centers, where families can go or call to get connected to needed supports, and which offers a coordinated approach to addressing family issues. The local Resource Centers will be responsible for 1) being the access point for a full range of information about available community and metropolitan resources, 2) simplifying access to services, 3) providing broad -based family assessment, 4) making referrals to a full range of supports within the community, not only traditional family services, and 5) initiating service South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 9 coordination among family service providers and community supports when needed. The four centers will be linked and supported through a Support Hub, which provides the coordination of services that are more cost - efficient when done on a regional basis. (Refer to Diagram A) The Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU). The Memorandum Of Understanding will be established among the local Resource Centers and community organizations, and would be an agreement to work collaboratively to 1) systematically identify and respond to family problems early, 2) integrate services for families in need of multiple supports and 3) strengthen families' natural support systems, and 4) evaluate service effectiveness. (Refer to Diagram B) The Family Support Network and other recommendations of the Family Services Collaborative will require the ongoing support and leadership of the South Hennepin communities, at both the local and regional levels. The Family Services Collaborative has proposed that: One, Community Councils be established in each South Hennepin community, comprised of representatives of the schools, cities, public health service providers, human service providers, residents, customers of services, local foundations, civic and religious organizations, local businesses and other key stakeholders. Proposed responsibilities of the Community Councils: • Help facilitate the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative Blueprint at the local level. • Serve as advisory bodies to the local resource centers. • Assess community strengths and needs, set community goals and evaluate progress toward these goals. • Advise city councils, school boards and other bodies as appropriate on how to meet family needs. • Coordinate community building efforts that support the strengths of families. • Develop service evaluation guidelines and incorporate evaluation requirements into local Request for Proposal (RFP) processes • Provide ongoing support to local collaborative efforts. Where possible, the. Community Councils would be established through expanding existing community -based advisory and citizen groups. Each South Hennepin community will decide how its Community Council would be formed and structured. (Refer to Diagram C) South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 10 Two, a South Hennepin Family Services Council be established to support local activities and to provide a vehicle to work together. The South Hennepin Family Services Council would allow representatives of local communities to work with their counterparts in the other South Hennepin communities and with Hennepin County to determine the common priorities which can be more efficiently addressed on a regional or subregional basis. It is proposed that the Family Services Council be formed by expanding the existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities (i.e. South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency) to include the ongoing participation of the schools and Hennepin County, rather than by creating a new entity. Proposed responsibilities of the South Hennepin Family Services Council: • Facilitate the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative Blueprint at the regional level. • Serve as the policy board of the Resource Center Support Hub. • Coordinate the development of the Memorandum of Understanding. • Coordinate a process for the Community Councils to work together to determine where their goals are similar and can be implemented and assessed on a regional or subregional basis. • Serve as a vehicle for the South Hennepin communities to coordinate with Hennepin County, especially in the decentralization and integration of County services in South Hennepin. • Assist the South Hennepin communities in seeking and coordinating funding opportunities. • Coordinate the standardization of local evaluation and Request for Proposal (RFP) processes among the South Hennepin communities. • Coordinate the evaluation, research and training efforts of the Family Services Collaborative Blueprint. • Work with emerging collaborative and human service initiatives and provide inter - collaborative coordination. • Promote the interests of the four South Hennepin communities in seeking resources to meet the needs of their families. (Refer to Diagram C) Diagram D shows the relationship between the Family Support Network and the governance structure. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 11 0- 1 N SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Local Resource Center Responsibilities Satellite sites are the "front door' to the system for families. Responsibilities include: 1. provide resource information 2. provide initial intake and make referrals 3. provide follow -up 4. initiate service coordination Diagram A: Resource Center Network Bloomington Resource Center , Eden Prairie Resource Center Edina Resource Center Resource Center Support Hub Richfield Resource Center Support Hub Responsibilities The Support Hub serves the Resource Centers by providing services more efficiently when done on a regional basis. Responsibilities include: 1. coordinate regional operations of the resource center network 2. develop and maintain service and client information databases 3. coordinate training of the resource center network staff 4. coordinate access to specialty services 5. coordinate and provide support for local intake and assessment activities 6. seek funding for resource center network 7. develop and coordinate the evaluation program for the resource center network SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Diagram B: Family Support Network Together, the Resource Center Network and the Provider Affiliation established through a Memorandum of Understanding form the Family Support Network Affiliation of Providers Organized Through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) The MOU is an interagency agreement in which family service providers would participate. The agreement would specify guidelines and procedures for: 1. Identifying and responding to potential family problems early. 2. Taking a lead role in coordinating services for a limited number of families, including ongoing assessment, referral, and follow -up. 3. Cooperating in service teams coordinated by other organizations. 4. Forming a working partnership with the Resource Center Network for assistance with information, intake, assessment, referrals, and follow -up. w - 1 11 1 I 1 - 1 I - - � , 1 I , I -01 1 , 1 - 1 - 1 � � 1 , 1 I I , I , Eden Prairie Edina Resource Bloomingto Center Resource Center Resource Center Richfield Resource Center Resource Center Support Hub 0 >r A 3 0 o' n Q v° 0 SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Diagram C: Community Councils and South Hennepin Family Services Council Community Council Responsibilities 1. Facilitate the implementation of the FSC at the local level. Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Richfield. 2. Advise City and School Boards and other bodies as Community Community ty determined. Council Community Community 3. Serve as advisory bodies to the local resource Council Council Council centers. 4. Assess community needs, set community goals and evaluate progress toward these goals. 5. Develop evaluation guidelines and incorporate 'Pe evaluation requirements into local RFP processes. 'o�A SAO 6. Coordinate community building efforts 7. Provide ongoing support to local collaborative 4°'a \60 . efforts. The Community Councils would be formed through expanding existing community advisory bodies where South Hennepin possible. Community Council represenation should p include customers of services, community residents, Family Services Council schools, cities health and human service providers, local foundations, and civic and religious organizations. South Hennepin Family Services Council Responsibilities 1. Facilitate the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative Blueprint at the regional level. 2. Serve as the policy board of the Resource Center Support Hub 3. Coordinate the development of the Memorandum of Understanding 4. Coordinate a process for the local Community Councils to work together to determine where their goals are similar and can be implemented and assessed on a regional or sub - regional basis. 5. Serve as a vehicle for the South Hennepin communities to coordinate with Hennepin County, especially in the decentralization and integration of County services in South Hennepin. 6. Assist the South Hennepin communities in seeking and coordinating funding opportunities 7. Coordinate the standardization of local evaluation and Request for Proposal (RFP) processes among the South Hennepin communities. 8. Work with emerging collaborative and human service initiatives and provide inter - collaborative coordination. 9. Coordinate the evaluation, research and training efforts of the Family Services Collaborative Blueprint. 10. Promote the interests of the four South Hennepin communities in seeking resources to meet the needs of families. The South Hennepin Family Services Council would be formed through an expansion of the existing joint powers agreement between the South Hennepin cities to include the participation of the South Hennepin School Districts and Hennepin County. Other key participants in the Family Services Council include families and users of services and representatives from the Affiliation of Providers. SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Diagram D: How the Family Support Network and Councils Fit Together ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Richfield Community Community Community Community Council Council Council Council --a ily Support Netwo k- - - N South Hennepin Family Services Council The elements of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative described above are goals for Phase 1 of implementation. Longer term goals include:. 1. Develop and implement strategies to strengthen community assets. 2. Develop and make available peer /mentoring support networks that will help families and children build relationships between themselves and their communities and will empower them to strengthen their own networks of support. 3. Reward service providers for innovative ways to reach out to families and children, such as doing outreach outside of the office and strengthening ties to other supports in the community to more effectively reach families and children in need. 4. All providers for whom it is appropriate should provide flexibility in their intake and hours of services to better serve families who are working or have other commitments during regular business hours. 5. Develop and measure goals for improving the social health of the community, improving the effectiveness of family services, and reducing the fragmentation and duplication of services. The four communities should work together to determine where goals are common and can be assessed on a regional basis. 6. Retool for the future by investing in training and education: • Provide training on how to prevent problems, identify early indications of problems and connect families and children to appropriate services. This training would be for front -line staff in schools, recreational programs, and religious organizations, therapists, family service providers, and others working with families and children. • Provide training to family- serving institutions on how to empower families to become active participants in decisions affecting their lives and in strengthening and developing their natural support networks. • Provide family service providers, schools policy makers, funders and other stakeholders with ongoing learning opportunities about the benefits of collaboration, successful collaborative models, and ways to actively promote collaboration. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 16 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION PLAN The first nine months of the implementation the Family Services Collaborative will focus on the development of the Family Support Network, including the development of an evaluation plan. The preliminary evaluation plan includes the claims or goals of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative and a conceptual plan for how evaluation information would be collected and analyzed. The development of outcome indicators and a final plan for,collecting and-analyzing -data will be developed by the end of the proposed work plan period Uune, 1996). 1. Save families and providers time in finding appropriate services and increase access to services. The Family Support Network will provide one central place of access for families and people helping families, simplifying the process and substantially reducing the amount of time they spend in trying to connect with needed services. The professional intake workers at the local Resource Centers will be well trained in broad -based intake and assessment. They will also be knowledgeable about the availability of and eligibility requirements for a wide range of health and human services, school services, county services and other community supports. The availability of this expertise will allow families to be linked to the appropriate supports more quickly and successfully than presently possible in our fragmented service system. Police and front -line workers in schools, cities, and community-based providers should begin to receive fewer phone calls requesting assistance in finding support services as the communities and providers become aware of the Family Support Network. As a result, front -line workers will gain more time to devote toward their primary responsibilities and become less concerned about making inappropriate or inadequate referrals for families in crisis. 2. Increase the likelihood that problems are addressed as they emerge, with the goal of reducing the long -term need for later intervention. The Memorandum Of Understanding will provide guidelines and procedures for identifying emerging problems and steering families to supports as needed. Training will be provided to front -line staff in schools and community-based organizations participating in the Family Support Network. These measures will increase the likelihood that South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, lmplemenation Grant Proposal 17 problems are addressed as they emerge, reducing stress on both families and the service system. 3. Improve the integration of services for families in need of multiple supports. Through the Memorandum Of Understanding, school -, city -, Hennepin County- and community-based providers will ensure that services are coordinated for families who need multiple supports. Support teams would be established when necessary, with a designated support team coordinator, a responsibility that would rotate among the Family Support Network organizations. Family members, friends or peers may act as the principal coordinator, with the support of a lead organization. Providing such a mechanism for integrating services should result in less duplication of services, less repetition of intake procedures, and a focus on serving the family holistically. The Family Support Network will provide opportunities for providers to come together to share information about situations they are dealing with and to brainstorm solutions. 4. Reduce the number of times a family has to tell its story and the amount of time providers spend repeating similar intake processes. The Family Support Network will reduce the number of phone calls families make and the number of times families have to repeat their stories before they get connected to the appropriate resources. If a family is in need of multiple supports, the Family Support Network will help to ensure that these supports are integrated and that the involved organizations are working together. The Family Support Network will establish a database of information about families it serves to provide front -line workers with quick access to important information about families with whom they are working. The database will provide information relating to families' eligibility for services and a list of other organizations that are working with a family. Any sharing of information about families would be done only with the consent of families and in accordance with data privacy laws. 5. Reduce the number of families who are unable to connect with the supports they need. The Family Support Network will establish a system for following up with families to see if they were adequately connected to services and if any new problems have developed since the intitial contact. Follow -up responsibilities for Family Support Network providers will be clearly defined, establishing accountability for serving families where none existed before. 6. Strengthen family supports. Through the Memorandum Of Understanding, and with local Resource Centers' help in finding resources, families and providers working with them will be encouraged to seek South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 18 and increase the level of support support from the families' natural support networks (e.g. family, friends, neighbors, religious communities, etc.) within each community. 7. Increase the ability to evaluate the success of serving families. The Family Support Network will provide an ongoing mechanism to collect data and evaluate the success of meeting families' needs across multiple agencies and programs working with the same families. 8. Provide the ability to identify gaps in services. The ability to track the success of connecting families to the services they are seeking will help identify gaps in services. 9. Save costs in the service system. The Family Support Network is expected to produce cost savings in the service system by: 1) reducing the amount of time providers spend in intake, assessment and making referrals, 2) linking families to needed supports quicker and at an earlier stage of the problem than is presently done, 3) reducing duplication in services, 4) strengthening the more informal supports of families, reducing the need for more costly social service programs. 10. Increase the availability and accessibility of county and other services presently not easily accessible to South Hennepin residents. Over 80 percent of all providers available to South Hennepin residents are based outside of this region. Included among services not locally available are the basic support and crisis services offered by Hennepin County. The proposed South Hennepin Family Services Council would serve as a central vehicle for the four South Hennepin communities to work with Hennepin County and other providers in their efforts to decentralize services into South Hennepin. 1. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of collaborative efforts at the local and regional (South Hennepin) levels. The Community Councils will provide a vehicle for cities, schools, and other key family serving institutions to come together to jointly assess community needs, set goals, and measure progress toward these goals. Presently, all these bodies identify needs, set goals and evaluate independently, resulting in duplication of effort and fragmented results. The South Hennepin Family Services Council will provide ongoing support for local activities and serve as a vehicle for the South Hennepin communities to work together to accomplish tasks more efficiently and effectively. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 19 2. Help ensure the successful implementation of the Family Support Network and other recommendations. The Community Councils and the South Hennepin Family Services Council will provide the necessary support and accountability structure to ensure the successful implementation of the Family Support Network and long -term recommendations of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. 3. Improve communication and build relationships across family serving institutions and communities. The Community Councils and South Hennepin Family Services Council will be vehicles for sharing ideas and establishing an ongoing collaborative approach to serving families. They will provide forums for seeking collaborative solutions, without expending the tremendous amount of energy that completely new collaborations require. 4. Develop a stronger and ongoing partnership between the South Hennepin communities and Hennepin County. One of the important goals of the Family Services Collaborative is to develop an integrated system of County, School, Public Health and community-based services. An ongoing partnership with Hennepin County is essential to implementing the goals of the Family Services Collaborative. 5. Provide a local decision making structure for the delivery of family services. Current federal and state trends in the funding of human services make it more important than ever that local decision makers determine and regularly assess the human service goals of their communities and evaluate how well these goals are being met. Determining reasonable goals and using effective evaluation will help local government and service providers to maximize the investment of public dollars and better meet the needs of the community. The effectiveness of the Family Support Network will be measured both in the short term and in the long term. In the short term, data about the families being assisted by the Family Support Network will be collected and compiled on a common database as specified by the Memorandums of Understand agreements. In the longer term, questionnaires and other types of follow -up will be done with the families to find out if the services received have not only helped them with the immediate problem, but also provided them with the necessary skills to cope with the problem in the long term. The families will also be asked if they need or would like some additional supports. In addition to evaluating the intended benefits of the proposed Family.Support Network for families and providers, the evaluation will also include an assessment of the effectiveness and South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 20 efficiency of the collaborative service delivery model. This information would be used to continuously improve the collaborative model. The key areas to measure are: 1) the net benefit or loss of time involved in collaborative planning and service delivery; 2) the ability to break down system barriers; 3) the efficiency of the interagency agreements and the collaborative governance structure; and 4) cost savings in providing services. The evaluation will depend on the quality of information collected. The Family Services Collaborative proposes to create a client based information system administered regionally by the Resource Center Support Hub. The database would include information collected 1) during intake at the local Resource Centers or any of the Family Support Network providers, which would be consolidated by the Resource Center Support Hub; 2) at scheduled short- and long -term follow -ups with families; 3) from customer satisfaction questionnaires; and 4) from surveys among providers. Other means of information collection may be identified as the evaluation procedures are implemented. Baseline data will be collected to measure progress toward those goals relating to cost savings. Any sharing of information about families would be done only with the consent of families and in accordance with data privacy laws. The following diagram is a preliminary flowchart showing how the Family Support Network would work and how it builds in a process for evaluating service effectiveness. South Hennepin Family Services CoUaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 21 Diagram E SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK Eft t yet /leaking support Out Identified rd needing help amily mennter or fronUine cognises a fam,ty of individual supports and asw resource information and hoer to e situation. Resource Center Provides information, assessment and/or roerrat, and follow up. No No FW* 90ek Q 1RVpfrt Conga with MW provider Does. D0W MOU organ~ fare* have an heva caps reads that car Id do aaaaw yes be met by the I organirauor � merd? Yes Intake and assessment is e, mpbted with asasunca horn from Resource linter as near No Corded with provider or individual outside of MOU organizations. No assurance of adpuate assessmen, referral, or 000rdwtron of services nytlsss they rater to Resouroa Center or MOU organisation. Provider serves ramuy, pruvmo. ---W. ,..,. — __._. supports as needed, or links to Resource Center c there s a need for further assistance they cannot provide dr link te. Referrals made. Continuum of Supports Resource Center /11er �toq Pow Support YMCA Please Privae Professional bisteulrortat low. up to sahod aavocee appal groups t erapat 600111 service core a, ehaWa nee" an bating mat programs progrerre IrsOriOflts war" agency Resource Center for MOU provider wet O family No n"US servim coordinadan)by degree of A eligible for SHIELD _♦ sang «conveneg a series service word► C or orher eerviee learn, WO tln tW Ws COMent nation s 1p cotlabors- The service team match Ce neetted7 / G bye? family Srldf «Pmd —who p either could or already sor U ptrtvidng G� Yes Ore Of fie pow" or organs -bons Minimal Intensive agrees to be the service coved -lix • far fits family. This service team Varying degrees of coordination will be needed N coordinator could be the parent depending an the lamely or individual. ServL Referral to coordination may range from panache cont existing a fendy rrmnber, s fried. s pas/ te ular service teem meetings to rsdvoasle, «sorteons from any a dk,pnra gm a a e«mrarn t of rare for serviall izUaDoretive the °fga"�bOne � s'� with higher levels of reed. Wild followup de fsrnny. fZ Resource Carter may also O preside blow up with the prove« dtat tle ernYY was Family s ce referred Cent O Resowoe C;sntsr provies � Does to Rswwas Grier G scheduled folkrr up vrth family have to reassessment faintly or Individual (wiN If Mix! provider is Involved now of G4011 —► an for reevaluWron consent) for doss with family. den tl unmet a the need for h" in Ifs Resource is respona" for log term needs? service CSM(S datebese. fdf wjp directly with family. coordination Resource certar follows up with MOU provider te nand« e ofAoortr,e. O J C Service dehnery a evaluated M tie Resoixcs Center n order 1u tract, success and failures. Inlor atan s gathered horn Qproviders. and the ,dsource coma. Evakw ion would Sim to deerlrwe: O - The utlCgiverese and efficiency due felam" and (wage a needed supports Unmet needs and service pops > Other variables. W South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 22 O 1 N U) N Is N tlfors o rtesa for ore Q r00ndife0 Yea No FW* 90ek Q 1RVpfrt Conga with MW provider Does. D0W MOU organ~ fare* have an heva caps reads that car Id do aaaaw yes be met by the I organirauor � merd? Yes Intake and assessment is e, mpbted with asasunca horn from Resource linter as near No Corded with provider or individual outside of MOU organizations. No assurance of adpuate assessmen, referral, or 000rdwtron of services nytlsss they rater to Resouroa Center or MOU organisation. Provider serves ramuy, pruvmo. ---W. ,..,. — __._. supports as needed, or links to Resource Center c there s a need for further assistance they cannot provide dr link te. Referrals made. Continuum of Supports Resource Center /11er �toq Pow Support YMCA Please Privae Professional bisteulrortat low. up to sahod aavocee appal groups t erapat 600111 service core a, ehaWa nee" an bating mat programs progrerre IrsOriOflts war" agency Resource Center for MOU provider wet O family No n"US servim coordinadan)by degree of A eligible for SHIELD _♦ sang «conveneg a series service word► C or orher eerviee learn, WO tln tW Ws COMent nation s 1p cotlabors- The service team match Ce neetted7 / G bye? family Srldf «Pmd —who p either could or already sor U ptrtvidng G� Yes Ore Of fie pow" or organs -bons Minimal Intensive agrees to be the service coved -lix • far fits family. This service team Varying degrees of coordination will be needed N coordinator could be the parent depending an the lamely or individual. ServL Referral to coordination may range from panache cont existing a fendy rrmnber, s fried. s pas/ te ular service teem meetings to rsdvoasle, «sorteons from any a dk,pnra gm a a e«mrarn t of rare for serviall izUaDoretive the °fga"�bOne � s'� with higher levels of reed. Wild followup de fsrnny. fZ Resource Carter may also O preside blow up with the prove« dtat tle ernYY was Family s ce referred Cent O Resowoe C;sntsr provies � Does to Rswwas Grier G scheduled folkrr up vrth family have to reassessment faintly or Individual (wiN If Mix! provider is Involved now of G4011 —► an for reevaluWron consent) for doss with family. den tl unmet a the need for h" in Ifs Resource is respona" for log term needs? service CSM(S datebese. fdf wjp directly with family. coordination Resource certar follows up with MOU provider te nand« e ofAoortr,e. O J C Service dehnery a evaluated M tie Resoixcs Center n order 1u tract, success and failures. Inlor atan s gathered horn Qproviders. and the ,dsource coma. Evakw ion would Sim to deerlrwe: O - The utlCgiverese and efficiency due felam" and (wage a needed supports Unmet needs and service pops > Other variables. W South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 22 GENERAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS The success of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative will depend on the commitment of the partner organizations, whose proposed primary roles and responsibilities are described below. The roles and responsibilities relate to the proposed priority recommendations: 1) the Family Support Network, 2) the Community Councils, 3) the South Hennepin Family Services Council, and 4) the decentralization and integration of county and other services. 1. Become a member organization of the South Hennepin Family Support Network: A. Assist in the development and operation of the district's respective local Resource Center. Where appropriate, and upon agreement with other local collaborative partners, reallocate Family Center or other school staff and/or provide other inkind resources to support the services of the local Resource Center. B. Assist in the development of and become a participant in the Memorandum of Understanding. Participation in the Memorandum of Understanding will require reorientation of some front -line staff hours to lead and/or participate in family support teams. The increase in staff time required for this activity, however, will be balanced by a reduction in the amount of time school staff currently spend in seeking resources and coordinating services for the families with whom they work. 2. Utilize the Resource Center Network when seeking resources to help families and when referring families in need of support from multiple organizations. 3. Partner with the district's respective City, community -based organizations and other identified stakeholders to form a broad -based Community Council. Where appropriate, and upon agreement with the partnering City, share the responsibility of providing staff support to the Community Council. 4. In partnership with the other members of the Community Council, fulfill the proposed responsibilities of the Community Council. 5. Become an ongoing partner in the existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities. The proposed partnership will also include the participation of Hennepin County, community -based providers and families. The new partnership is referred to as the South Hennepin Family Services Council. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 23 1. Become a member organization of the South Hennepin Family Support Network, to the extent that the city provides services to families through Health and Human Service Departments, Information and Referral Services, Police Departments, Housing and Redevelopment Authorities, or other, departments. A. Assist in the development and operation of the city's respective local Resource Center. Where appropriate, and upon agreement with other local collaborative partners, reallocate city staff and /or provide space or other inkind resources to support the local Resource Center. For example, Bloomington Public Health and Bloomington Human Services have staff that currently provide intake, assessment, and information and referral services. Some of these staff may be reallocated to support the Resource Centers. B. Assist in the development of and become a participant in the Memorandum of Understanding. Participation in the Memorandum of Understanding will require reorientation of some staff hours to lead and /or participate in family support teams. The increase in staff time required for this activity, however, will be balanced by a reduction in the amount of time city staff currently spend in seeking resources and coordinating services for families they work with. 2. Utilize the Resource Center Network when seeking resources to help a family and when referring families in need of support from multiple organizations. 3. Partner with the City's respective school district, community-based organizations and other identified stakeholders to form a broad -based Community Council. Where appropriate, and upon agreement with the partnering school district, share the responsibility of providing staff support to the Community Council. 4. In partnership with the other members of the Community Council, fulfill the proposed responsibilities of the Community Council. 5. Remain a partner in the'existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities which is proposed to be broadened to include the participation of the South Hennepin school districts, Hennepin County, community-based providers and families. The new partnership is referred to as the South Hennepin Family Services Council. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 24 1. Become a member organization of the South Hennepin Family Support Network: A. Assist in the development and operation of the Resource Center Network, coordinating and managing the Resource Center Support Hub activities. An interagency agreement among the organizations providing the services of the Support Hub would spell out who has what responsibilities in implementing the Hub's day to day operations. --B. Assist in the development of and become a participant in the Memorandum of Understanding. Through the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, provide the overall coordination of the development of the Memorandum of Understanding. 2. Fulfill the responsibilities of the proposed South Hennepin Family Services Council. 3. Expand its existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities to include the participation of the four South Hennepin schools districts, Hennepin County, community -based providers and families. The new partnership is referred to as the South Hennepin Family Services Council. 1. Become a member organization of the South Hennepin Family Support Network. A. Assist in the development and operation of the Resource Center Network, reallocating County staff and /or other inkind resources (e.g. training) to support the services of the Network. B. Assist in the development of and become a participant in the Memorandum of Understanding. Participation in the Memorandum of Understanding will require reorientation of some staff hours to lead and /or participate in family support teams. The increase in staff time required for this activity, however, will be balanced by a reduction in the amount of time County staff currently spend in seeking resources and coordinating services for the families they work with in South Hennepin. 2. Utilize the Resource Center Network when seeking resources to help a family and when referring families in need of support from multiple organizations. 3. Become an ongoing partner in the existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities. The proposed partnership will also include the participation of the South Hennepin school districts, community -based providers and families. The new partnership is referred to as the South Hennepin Family Services Council. 4. Work with the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative to localize and integrate County services in South Hennepin. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 25 The level of involvement and expectations of community-based providers will vary depending on the size, capacity and ability of providers. It is expected that the number of community-based providers participating in the Family Support Network, Community Councils and Regional Council would increase over time. The general roles and responsibilities include: 1. Become a member organization of the South Hennepin Family Support Network. A. Assist in the development and operation of the Resource Center Network. Not all providers would play a direct role in pooling their resources to provide the services of the Resource Center Network. Organizations that have made some tentative commitments include Fairview Hospital, Storefront/ Youth Action, and Family and Children's Service. Where appropriate, and upon agreement with other local collaborative partners, reallocate staff time to support the operations of the Resource Center Network. For example, Fairview Hospital may provide crisis information and referral services after hours. B. Depending on the capacity of the provider, assist in the development of and participate in the Memorandum of Understanding. Participation in the Memorandum of Understanding will require reorientation of some front -line staff hours to lead and /or participate in family support teams. The increase in staff time required for this activity, however, would be balanced by a reduction in the amount of time front -line staff currently spend in seeking resources and coordinating services for the families with whom they work. 2. Utilize the Resource Center Network when seeking resources to help a family and when referring families in need of support from multiple organizations. 3. Participate in the local Community Councils. 4. Participate in the South Hennepin Family Services Council. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 26 WORK PLAN NARRATIVE The first work plan (Form 2) consists of objectives and activities that would be begun or accomplished during the period of October 1995 through June 1996. The first year work plan is focused on the development of the various components of the proposed Family Support Network and the Family Services Collaborative governance structure. Specifically, the Family Services Collaborative first year work plan (9 months) is guided by four goals: 1. Ensure the long -term support, governance and stability of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative (FSC). 2. Begin the process of establishing a Family Support Network in South Hennepin that will: 1) systematically identify and deal with family problems as they emerge; 2) increase access and simplify the process of linking families and children to needed supports; 3) integrate these supports into a continuum of care that will result in a more holistic and successful resolution of these problems; 4) strengthen families' natural support networks (e.g. relatives, friends, neighbors, religious organizations); and 5) improve the ability to evaluate services to families and children. 3. Increase the accessibility and effectiveness of Hennepin County services by making services more community based and integrated with South Hennepin community providers. 4. Increase awareness about and participation in the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. The objectives outlined in the work plan state what we expect to accomplish in the first year. They are as follows: 1. Establish a governance structure and process for the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. 2. Begin the development of a funding plan for the ongoing operations of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. 3. Begin the process of developing the local Resource Centers in South Hennepin. 4. Begin the process of developing the South Hennepin Resource Center Network Support Hub. A. Begin the process of developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 27 B. Develop an evaluation design to measure the effectiveness of the Family Support Network as agreed upon in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). C. Conduct a feasibility study to determine the type of client information system and common intake process that should be developed as part of the South Hennepin Family Support Network. D. Begin the development of a training program. 5. Increase the availability of county staff in the South Hennepin communities through the Resource Centers and other locations as determined. 6. Hold informational meetings with providers educators, families, elected officials, . businesses, religious organizations and other stakeholders. The strategies in the work plan provide detail about how each objective will be carried out. Some of these strategies are local activities and some are regional, meaning the joint effort of the four South Hennepin communities. The people anticipated to be involved and responsible for coordinating each strategy are indicated in the work plan. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 28 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 10/6195) FORM 2 GOAL 1 Ensure th6 long= term: support;::governance >and stability of the South Hennepin Family Services:: Collaborative {FSC). OBJECTIVE 1.1: Establish a governance structure and process for the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. STRATEGIES Participants Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 1.1.1. Based on the FSC recommendations, develop final Interim Exec. SHeRPA staff Oct '95 - recommendations regarding the structure, composition and Committee will serve staff /General Jan'96 decision making process of the Family Services Council. as a working group. project (Refer to the Recommendations Report for a description of The Adv. Committee coordinator recommended representation and Council responsibilities.) and Board will review and approve. Monthly meetings 1.1.2. Based on the FSC recommendations, develop final To be determined by City managers & Oct '95 - recommendations regarding the structure, composition and each city superintendents Jan'96 decision making process of the Community Councils. (Refer will designate to the Recommendations Report for a description of co- coordinators. recommended representation and Council responsibilities.) 1.1.3. Obtain feedback from the South Hennepin city Interim FSC SHeRPA Feb '96 councils, school boards and Hennepin County. Advisory Committee staff /local city & and Board school staff 1.1.4. Seek necessary approval by the South Hennepin city Interim FSC SHeRPA Feb '96 councils, school boards and Hennepin County. Advisory Committee staff /local city & and Board school staff 1.1.5. Establish the ongoing FSC governance structure. Appointed SHeRPA Mar '96 representatives. staff /local city & school staff OBJECTIVE 1.2: Begin the development of a funding plan for the ongoing operations of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 1.2.1. Identify a working group to develop strategies for the Minimum 5 person SHeRPA By mid Nov ongoing funding of the FSC. (These strategies will focus on working group staff /General '95 securing new and reallocating existing resources, and the short Meet as needed project and long term resource needs of the FSC.) coordinator South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 29 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 1016/95) FORM 2 1.2.2. Develop initial set of ongoing funding strategies for the Funding strategies SHeRPA By the end South Hennepin FSC. working group staff /General of Apr '95 Frame project Coordinating 2.1.1. Identify at least one local Resource Center (RC) coordinator To be determined 1.2.3. Seek necessary approval /agreement for the funding Funding strategies SHeRPA May '96 strategies. working group staff /General community people from the schools, cities, Public Health, private project providers, parents and other stakeholders. coordinator 1.2.4. Begin the implementation of the funding strategies as Funding strategies SHeRPA By the end needed. working group staff /General of Jun '96 Nov '95 project community. 2.1.3. Establish minimum service standards for the local coordinator RC Network GOAL 2: Begin the process of establishing a Family Support :Network in South Hennepin that will A) systematically identify and deal. with. family problems as they.emerge; 2) increase access and simplify the. process of linking families and.children to.needed supports; 3) integrate these:supports:into a continuum of carethat will. . result in amore holistic and:: successful. resolution of .these: problems; 4): strengthen: families': natural support networks (e.g , relatives; friends; neighbors; religious organizations); and 5):: improve the ability to evaluate services ao: famili6 and children., . OBJECTIVE 2.1: Begin the process of developing the local Resource Centers in South Hennepin. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 2.1.1. Identify at least one local Resource Center (RC) Minimum 5 person To be determined By early implementation committee to guide the development of the implementation by each Nov '95 local Resource Center(s). The committee(s) will include committee(s) community people from the schools, cities, Public Health, private Meet as needed providers, parents and other stakeholders. 2.1.2. Determine a lead agency(s) to help coordinate the To be determined by To be determined By early startup of the local Resource Centers each community by each Nov '95 community. 2.1.3. Establish minimum service standards for the local Representatives of RC Network By the end Resource Centers. the local Resource coordinator of Nov '95 Center (RC) implementation committee(s) 1- 2 meetings South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 30 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 1016/95) FORM 2 2.1.4. Develop agreement(s) between local RC partners to RC implementation Local lead Dec '95 - establish the operations of the local RCs. The agreements committees agency(s) /RC Mar '96 will specify 1) the services to be provided per the minimum '95 Network service standards (see objective 2.1.3), 2) the governing and coordinator Meet as needed management structure, 3) the I & R data system (see objective 2.3D objective 2.2), 4) staffing patterns, and 5) the reallocation of 2.2.2. Develop a plan for the Information and Referral Information system resources necessary to begin the RC operations. Nov'95 - database system for the Resource Center Network. working group 2.1.5. Obtain feedback from stakeholders. RC implementation Local lead By the end coordinator committees agency(s)/ RC of Apr '96 Information When the Network working group /Local system first coordinator Resource Center 2.1.6. Seek approval /agreement by the local collaborating RC implementation Local lead By the end organizations. committees agency(s)/ RC of May '96 coordinator/ begins Network local lead operations coordinator 2.1.7. Develop an initial marketing /outreach plan to publicize RC implementation Local lead May - Jun the availability of the local Resource Centers. committees agency(s)/ RC '96 Network coordinator 2.1.8. Begin piloting at least one Resource Center. RC implementation Local lead By the end committees agency(s)/ RC of June '96 Network coordinator OBJECTIVE 2.2: Support Hub activity: Develop the Information and Referral database system for the Resource Center Network. 2.2.1. Identify a working group to guide the development of Minimum 5 person Information By mid Nov the Information and Referral database system for the working group system '95 Resource Center Network. (This same working group will coordinator guide the study of the client information system [see Meet as needed objective 2.3D 2.2.2. Develop a plan for the Information and Referral Information system Information Nov'95 - database system for the Resource Center Network. working group system Apr '96 coordinator 2.2.3. Begin implementing the Information and Referral Information system Information When the database system. working group /Local system first Resource Center coordinator /RC Resource committees Network Center coordinator/ begins local lead operations agency(s) South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 31 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 10/6/95) FORM 2 OBJECTIVE 2.3: Support Hub activity: Conduct a feasibility study to determine the type of client information system and common intake process that should be developed as part of the South Hennepin Family Support Network. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Person(s) Frequency of Responsible for Frame Responsible for Activity Coordinating Activity 2.3.1. Conduct a feasibility study of a client data system, Information system Information By the end including an assessment of existing client information working group (see system of Mar '96 systems. Work with the State's Information Management objective 2.2.1) coordinator Meet as needed Systems Focus Team. 2.4.2. Develop a model MOU. MOU working 2.3.2. Develop recommendations regarding the type of client Information system Information By the end information system that should be incorporated into the working group system of Apr '96 Family Support Network. By the end coordinator group 2.3.3. Seek necessary approval /agreement by the FSC Information system Information By the end Advisory Committee and collaborating organizations. working group system of May '96 Coordinator of May '96 coordinator MOU working OBJECTIVE 2.4: Support Hub activity: Begin the process of developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among school, human service, county and other providers that will provide guidelines and procedures to: 1) identify and respond to family problems as they begin to emerge, 2) integrate services for families in need of multiple supports, 3) strengthen families' natural support networks, and 4) measure the effectiveness of the Family Support Network. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 2.4.1. Identify a working group of people to guide the Minimum 5 person MOU /Evaluation By the end development of the Memorandum of Understanding working group. Coordinator of Nov '95 (MOLD). Meet as needed 2.4.2. Develop a model MOU. MOU working MOU /Evaluation By the end group Coordinator of Apr '96 2.4.3. Obtain feedback from stakeholders. MOU working MOU /Evaluation By the end group Coordinator of May '96 2.4.4 Seek necessary approval /agreement by the FSC MOU working MOU /Evaluation By the end Advisory Committee and collaborating organizations. group Coordinator of May '96 2.4.5. Begin to pilot the MOU. MOU working MOU /Evaluation By the end group Coordinator of June '96 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 32 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 10/6/95) FORM 2 OBJECTIVE 2.5: Support Hub activity: Develop an evaluation design to measure the effectiveness of the Family. Support Network as agreed upon in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOP. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Frame Activity . Coordinating Coordinating 2.5.1. Identify a working group to guide the development of Minimum 5 person MOU /Evaluation By the end the evaluation design. working group. Coordinator of Nov '95 of Jan '96 Meet as needed Meet as needed 2.5.2. Develop the evaluation design based on the guidelines Evaluation working MOU /Evaluation By the end developed by the State of Minnesota. group Coordinator of May '96 2.5.3. Obtain feedback from providers, parents and other Evaluation working MOU /Evaluation Feb - May stakeholders. group Coordinator '96 2.5.4. Seek necessary approval /agreement by the FSC Evaluation working MOU /Evaluation By the end Advisory Committee and collaborating organizations. group Coordinator of May '96 2.5.5. Begin to pilot the evaluation design. Evaluation working MOU /Evaluation 'By the end group Coordinator of June '96 OBJECTIVE 2.6: Support Hub Activity: Begin the development of a training program that includes training for: 1) intake, referral and follow -up procedures, 2) the guidelines and procedures of the Memorandum of Understanding, and 3) the evaluation design. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 2.6.1. Identify a working group to guide the development of Minimum 5 person General project By the end the training program. working group coordinator of Jan '96 Meet as needed 2.6.2. Develop a training program, building from existing Training working General project By mid May training models. group coordinator '96 2.6.3 Seek necessary approval /agreement by the FSC Training working General project By the end Advisory Committee and collaborating organizations. group coordinator of May '96 2.6.4. Begin to provide training to designated Resource Center Training working General project May - Jun staff in intake, referral and follow -up procedures. group coordinator '96 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 33 WORK PLAN, OCT. '95 - JUNE ' 96 (REVISED 10/6/95) FORM 2 GOAL 3 Increase theaccessibility and effectiveness of Hennepin County services by making services more community based and :integrated with South Hennepin:community providers OBJECTIVE 3.1: Increase the availability of county staff in the South Hennepin communities through the Resource Centers and other locations as determined. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 3.1.1. Develop a process for coordinating the integration of Representatives from SHeRPA staff/ By the end county services in South Hennepin within the framework the Interim Adv. General project of Nov '95 of the South Hennepin Family Support Network. Cmte, the RC coordinator Nov '95 - implementation coordinator/ Jun '96 cmte(s) & Henn. Interim FSC Cnty Advisory 3.1.2. Continue the process of integrating county staff with Representatives from SHeRPA staff/ Nov '95 - South Hennepin community providers. the Interim Adv. General project ongoing Cmte, the RC coordinator implementation cmte(s) & Henn. Cnty GOAL,4: Increase: awareness aboutand participation in: the South Hennepin Family Services: Collaborative. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Hold informational meetings with providers, educators, families, elected officials, businesses, religious organizations and other stakeholders. STRATEGIES Participants and Person(s) Time Frequency of Responsible for Frame Activity Coordinating 4.1.1. Begin developing a schedule of informational meetings. Interim FSC General project By the end Advisory Committee coordinator of Oct '95 4.1.2. Hold informational meetings Hold at least 10 General project Nov '95 - informational coordinator/ Jun '96 meetings Interim FSC Advisory Committee South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implementation Grant Proposal 34 COLLABORATION CHART FORM 3 Type of Organization Name of Contact Person Services Organization or and Phone Collaborative Parents Shelley Scharping, - participation in relevant focus groups and 944 -6453 committees Ann Boerth, 941 -6452 School Districts Bloomington School Timothy Connors, The school districts vary in the services and District 885 -8454 resource contributions they have made and/or will make to the Collaborative. The Eden Prairie School Gerald McCoy, contributions include one or more of the District 975 -7000 following: Edina School District Kenneth Dragseth, - staff for the Resource Center Network 928 -2500 - space for the Resource Center Network Richfield School District Barbara Devlin, - participation in the Memorandum of 798 -6010 Understanding ■ supplies, phone, copying, postage, computers - staff /volunteers for planning, coordination, management and training - participation in relevant focus groups and committees Local Units of Bloomington City Mark Bernhardson, The cities vary in the services and resource Government — 948 -8784 contributions they have made and/or will make to the Collaborative. The Human services, police, Eden Prairie City Carl Jullie, contributions include one or more of the housing and health 949 -8410 following: departments Edina City Ken Rosland, - staff for the Resource Center Network 927 -8861 - space for the Resource Center Network Richfield City James Prosser, - participation in the Memorandum of 861 -9700 Understanding - supplies, phone, copying, postage, computers - staff /volunteers for planning, coordination, management and training - participation in relevant focus groups and committees South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 35 COLLABORATION CHART FORM 3 Public Health Bloomington Public Gayle Hallin, • staff for the Resource Center Network Health 948 -8905 • staff /volunteers for planning, coordination and training . participation in the Memorandum of Understanding • participation in relevant focus groups and committees Hennepin County Community Initiatives Rex Holzemer, . staff for the Resource Center Network 348 -4806 • localized staff to work within the FSC Children and Family Charles Hogan, framework to integrate services with Services Department 348 -8067 community and school based services . participation in the Memorandum of Hennepin County Jane Leck, Understanding Libraries 829 -5461 staff /volunteers for planning, coordination and training Vicki Oeljen, . participation in relevant focus groups and 869 -5054 committees Other Government South Hennepin Jeanne Massey, • staff for the Resource Center Network Regional Planning 922 -5999 . participation in the Memorandum of Agency Understanding • staff /volunteers for planning, coordination and training Private Human Service Family & Children's Roger Grusznski, Private providers vary in the services and Providers Service - South Branch 885 -1262 resource contributions they have made Storefront Youth Action Ronald Barnes, and/or will make to the Collaborative. The contributions include one or more of the 830 -1331 following: Community Action for Sharon Johnson, . staff for the Resource Center Network Suburban Hennepin 933 -9639 . space for the Resource Center Network Cornerstone Advocacy Susan Neis, . participation in the Memorandum of Services 8840376 Understanding (refer to list of working . supplies, phone, copying, postage, group members for computers additional organizations ' staff /volunteers for planning, involved in the FSC) coordination, management and training . participation in relevant focus groups and committees South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 36 COLLABORATION CHART FORM 3 Private Health Fairview Hospital Linda Packard, • start up funds 924 -1440 • assistance with developing the Resource Center Client Information System • grant writer for raising funds for the FSC • staff /volunteers for planning, coordination and training • participation in the Memorandum of Understanding • participation in relevant focus groups and committees Religious Organizations House of Prayer Chuck Carlson, • participation in relevant focus groups and 866 -8471 committees Steve Richards, ' participation in the Memorandum of 929 -0049 Understanding Funders Minneapolis Foundation Genie Dixon, • participation in relevant focus groups and 339 -7343 committees United Way Nathalie Pyle, 340 -7400 Other Highland Management Arlene Dixson, • participation in relevant focus groups and Company 925 -1020 committees United Way Nathalie Pyle, 340 -7400 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 37 INTEGRATED FUND Preliminary cost projections of the Family Services Collaborative during startup and on an ongoing basis have been done in an attempt to estimate the short and long -term financial needs of the Collaborative. The startup costs are estimated at $793,000 and the ongoing annual costs are estimated at $656,000. It is anticipated that approximately 60 percent of the startup and 75 percent of the ongoing costs will be met through pooling resources among the partner organizations. While there may be some new dollars contributed by the partner organizations, most of the needed resources will be provided through a collaborative process of realigning and pooling existing resources. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is developing an integrated fund based on the "Holding Company" model to account for the pooled resources of the collaborative partners. The Holding Company model requires each member organization of the Family Services Collaborative to maintain records of its resources contributed to the Collaborative. As fiscal agent, the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency will develop a unified financial statement at the end of each program year. As the Collaborative evolves over the next few years, the nature and functions of the integrated fund may change. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 38 BUDGET NARRATIVE The first year budget request was developed in accordance with the first year work plan objectives. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is requesting $187,500 in start up funds, which will be matched by up to $645,744 in new and reallocated existing resources. Staff: A total of $124,800, or 66 percent, of the implementation budget will be used to cover salaries and related staff costs. A total of four full -time equivalents will be needed to coordinate the activities of the initial startup phase, during which the various components of the Family Support Network will be developed. The staff will be responsible for assisting in the development of the local Resource Centers and for coordinating the development of the Resource Center Support Hub, which includes the Memorandum of Understanding, the client information system, the training program and the evaluation plan. Contracted Services: $30,000 is budgeted for contracted services, which includes a feasibility study of the client information system, training services and evaluation services. If it is determined that some of the responsibilities currently outlined for staff would be more appropriately done through a contractual service, we may request a line item change to move funds from staff to contractual services. Computer, phone and fax equipment: $16,100 is budgeted for computer, phone and fax equipment for the Resource Center Network. The actual amount of these funds used will depend on the total number of Resource Centers developed during the first nine months and the amount of compatible existing equipment allocated by the collaborative partners. Materials /supplies, copying and postage: $11,386 is budgeted for materials /supplies, copying and postage used during the development phase of the Family Support Network. Another $864 is allocated to cover instate employee travel expenses. Other expenses: Other budgeted expenses include reimbursements for participating parents, outreach /advertising and the First Call For Help Database. The following Participation Agreements outline the minimum resources each of the Collaborative partner organizations has projected to allocate to the development of the Family Services Collaborative during the first year work plan period. The value of the inkind resources is significant and reflects the strong commitment of the various partners to the vision and goals of the Family Services Collaborative. Resources are being realigned and pooled in an effort to foster significant improvement in the nature and delivery of family services in South Hennepin. The Participation Agreements (following the Budget South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 39 Supplement) of each of the partner organizations reflect the resources each is able to commit to the Family Services Collaborative. The actual contributions made during the first year work plan period may differ from the projected contributions depending on the actual progress made in the development of the Family Support Network. For example, a significant share of the projected inkind resources are staff for the local Resource Centers. The opening dates of the Centers are not yet fixed and, thus, staff will not be reallocated until the centers are open. Actual contributed resources will be tracked and recorded for the Integrated Fund. Attached is a supplementary budget showing both the cash and inkind resources and expenses projected for the first year work plan period. A total of $645,744 in inkind resources is anticipated to be allocated to the development of the Family Services Collaborative during the first year work plan period. Staff: The bulk ($530,236) of inkind resources is related to personnel costs for continued planning and coordination, management and administration, and direct services at the local Resource Centers. The partners of the Collaborative have made tentative commitments to reallocating and pooling existing personnel to provide intake staff for the local Resource Centers. Hennepin County has made tentative commitments to reassign existing staff to work in South Hennepin at the Resource Centers either as intake staff or as county social workers based at the Resource Centers. Some of the county staff may also be placed at other locations in South Hennepin as determined. Space: Potential inkind space and the related costs of furniture and supplies for the Resource Centers and Support Hub are valued at $31,942. Four preliminary sites have been identified for the local Resource Centers: • Family & Children's Services has proposed space for a Bloom. /Richfield Resource Center. • Storefront Youth Action has proposed space for a Richfield Resource Center if needed. • The Eden Prairie School District has proposed space for an Eden Prairie Resource Center. • The Edina Schools District has proposed space for an Edina Resource Center. Computer, phone, fax and other equipment: Some of the needed equipment for the Resource Center Network will be provided by the partner organizations. A total value of $10,350 in equipment has been tentatively committed. Materials, supplies, copying, postage: A total of $2,466 in inkind supplies, copying, and postage has been tentatively committed by the partner organizations for the first year work plan. Resource Libraries: The partner organizations anticipate integrating their existing resource libraries as part of the Resource Center Network. The libraries are valued at $41,500. Other: Fairview Auxillary and Foundation anticipate contributing a minimum of $25,000 in grants for the startup phase of the Family Support Network. Additional inkind resources include training and computer graphic services. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 40 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 41 BUDGET REQUEST FORM FORM 4 Budget period from October 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996 APPLICANT AGENCY: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. South Hennepin Regional Planning 5701 Normandale Road 612 - 922 -5999 Agency for Human Services Edina, MN 55424 FUND CATEGORY BUDGET CATEGORY FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Salary $99,840 Employee benefits $24,960 Contracted Services $30,000 Employee in -state travel $864 Materials, supplies, phone, postage, print, copy $11,386 Equipment $16,100 Other $4,350 TOTAL $187,500 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 41 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION FORM 5 APPLICANT AGENCY: South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services FUND CATEGORY: Family Services Collaborative BUDGET CATEGORY ITEMIZED EXPENSES TOTAL Salary 4 F.T.E. Resource Center Network coordinators $99,840 @ $16.00 /hour. Prorated for 9 months. Employee taxes and Salary ($99,840) x 25 %. Prorated for 9 months. $24,960 benefits FICA: 6.2 %; PERA: 4.48 %; Unemployment: 3.5 %; Health, Life, Dental: 8 %; Staff Development: 2.82% Contracted services Client information system study and $30,000 development, training services, facilitators and evaluation services: $30,000 Employee in -state travel 3,200 miles x .27 = $2,000 $864 Materials, supplies, Printing /Copying: $3,000 $11,386 phone, postage, print, Postage: $3,000 copy Materials /Supplies: $2,686 Phone: $2,700 Equipment Computers: $14,000 $16,100 Phones: $1,000 FAX machines: $1,100 Other Reimbusements: travel — $750 $4,350 childcare — $1,000 Outreach/Advertising: $2,000 First Call For Help Database: $600 TOTAL $187,500 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 42 BUDGET SUPPLEMENT The following is a breakdown of projected revenues and expenses for the first year work plan period. It shows the grant and inkind resources anticipated from both the State of Minnesota and the partner organizations. As stated previously, the actual resource contributions made by the partner organizations during the first year work plan period may differ from the projected contributions depending on the actual progress made in the development of the Family Support Network. EXPENSES Staff PARTNER RESOURCES $530,236 $655,036 FSC GRANT GRANTS INKIND TOTAL REVENUES Benefits /taxes $24,960 State of MN $187,500 $187,500 School districts $117,790 $117,790 Cities $112,318 $112,318 Public Health $17,460 $17,460 SHeRPA $42,458 $42,458 Hennepin County $246,596 $246,596 Private providers $25,000 $84,122 $109,122 TOTAL INCOME $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 EXPENSES Staff $124,800 $530,236 $655,036 Salaries $99,840 Benefits /taxes $24,960 Contracted services $30,000 $2,950 $32,950 Employee in -state travel $864 S864 Computers, phone, fax equipment $16,100 $10,350 $26,450 Space and furniture $31,942 $31,942 Materials, supplies, copying, postage $11,386 $2,466 $13,852 Resource library $41,500 $41,500 Other $4,350 $25,000 $1,300 $30,650 TOTAL EXPENSES $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 INCOME - EXPENSES $0 $0 $0 $0 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 43 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS (TENTATIVE LIST) Name of organization Minimum resource contributions Value of contributed resources Bloomington School District staff for the Bloomington/Richfield Resource Center • staff for planning, coordination and training • materials, supplies and resource library for the Bloomington /Richfield Resource Center $46,801 Eden Prairie School District Eden Prairie Resource Center office space and furniture • management and training services • office supplies and equipment for the Eden Prairie Resource Center • staff for planning and coordination $21,823 Edina School District • staff for planning and coordination • equipment, materials, supplies and resource library • space for the Edina Resource Center $27,400 Richfield School District • staff for the Bloomington /Richfield Family Center • staff for planning and coordination • materials, supplies and resource library for the $21,766 Bloomington/Richfield Resource Center Bloomington City • staff for the Bloomington/Richfield Resource Center • staff for planning and coordination • materials, supplies and resource library for the Bloomington/Richfield Resource Center $73,716 Eden Prairie City staff for planning and coordination $7,500 Edina City • staff for planning and coordination $2,072 Richfield City • staff for planning and coordination $29,030 South Hennepin Regional staff for planning and coordination Planning Agency space for the Resource Center Support Hub • management support for the Support Hub • copying, postage, supplies $42,458 Bloomington Public Health • staff for the Bloomington/Richfield Resource Center ($29,667 expected for future Resource Centers) • staff for planning, coordination and training $17,460 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 44 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS (TENTATIVE LIST) Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department • staff for the Resource Center Network • staff for planning and coordination • localized staff to work within the FSC framework to integrate services with community and school based services • staff and/or other resources for training Community Initiatives • staff for planning and coordination $246,596 Family & Children's Service - space for the Bloomington /Richfield Resource Center South Hennepin Branch staff for the Resource Center Networkmaterials and supplies for the Bloomington /Richfield Resource Center • materials, postage, supplies and office equipment • staff for planning and coordination $48,000 Storefront Youth Action staff for the Resource Center Network • potential space for a Richfield Resource Center • materials, postage, supplies and office equipment • staff for planning and coordination $27,972 Other human service providers staff for planning and coordination To be • staff for the Resource Center Network determined United Way • staff for planning and coordination To be determined Fairview Hospital minimum $25,000 in start up funds • assistance with developing the Family Support Network Client Information System • grant writing services • staff for planning and coordination $33,150 TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS $645,744 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 45 Attachment A The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative Steering Committee The planning phase of the Collaborative has been guided by a Steering Committee comprised of parents and representatives from Hennepin County and the South Hennepin schools, Public Health, cities, community -based providers, fenders of services, and employers. The following is a list of the Steering Committee members: Ada Alden, Eden Prairie Family Services Karyn Arazi, Bloomington School Board Deb Clark, Bloomington parent Ronald Barnes, Storefront Youth Action Camillo DeSantis, Richfield Human Services Planning Council, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Genie Dixon, Minneapolis Foundation Arlene Dixson, Highland Apartments Sandra Eliason, Edina Schools Mary Endorf, Eden Prairie School Board Betsy Flaten, Edina Human Relations Commission, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Lynda Gault, Richfield Schools, Special Education Roger Grusznski, Family and Children's Service Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Public Health Charles Hogan, Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department Coral Houle, Mayor of Bloomington — Steering Committe Co -chair Carol Huttner, Bloomington/Richfield Family Center Dennis Johnson, Richfield Human Services Coordinator, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Sara Jones, Edina School Board Darwin Miles, YMCA, South Branch Karen Norman, Eden Prairie School Board Dennis Paulson, Eden Prairie Police Lorinda Pearson, Bloomington Human Services, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Nancy Rowley, Richfield School Board Shelley Scharping, Edina parent — Steering Committee Co -chair Kim Thoa Nguyen, social services provider Kathy Wrucke, Richfield parent Attachment B SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Working Group Participants Working Group #1 Task: Develop an implementation plan an evaluation process to measure service effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Ada Alden, Director of Eden Prairie Family Services, Eden Prairie Family Center Bette Anderson, Eden Prairie Nancy Atchison, Edina Karen Beese, Coordinator for Bloomington Senior Program Coral Houle, Mayor of Bloomington Mary Endorf, Eden Prairie School Board Dennis Johnson, Human Services Coordinator City of Richfield Gerald McCoy, Superintendent of Eden Prairie Public Schools Kevin McTigue, Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department Susan Rosenberg, Richfield City Council and Richfield Human Services Planning Council James Stewart, Director of Bloomington Community Education Working Group #2 Task: Develop an implementation plan for a comprehensive referral system to link South Hennepin residents to needed services. Kittie Alexander, Learning Readiness Supervisor for Edina Family Center Ronald Barnes, Storefront/Youth Action Mary Comils, Director Community Relations for Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services Lieutenant Dave Ericson, Bloomington Police Department Karen Flanigan, Fairview Physicians Associates Charles Hogan, Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department Carol Huttner, Coordinator of the Bloomington /Richfield Family Center Dennis Johnson, Human Services Coordinator City of Richfield Karen Norman, Eden Prairie School Board Grace Norris, Executive Director for the Greater Minneapolis Daycare Association Linda Packard, Manager of Community Health for Fairview - Southdale Hospital Lorinda Pearson, Manager of Bloomington Human Services Division Nancy Schuett, Supervisor for Human Services Division, City of Bloomington Audrey Wagner, Bloomington Public Health Division Priscilla Williams, Owner /Operator of Especially For Children, Inc. Working Group #3 Task: Develop strategies for building and sustaining support systems for families in South Hennepin. Cindy Barriga, Social Worker at Jefferson Senior High School, Bloomington Mary Comils, Director of Community Relations at Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services Betsy Flaten, Edina Cathy Iverson, Edina Chemical Awareness Marva Jefferson, Community Action For Suburban Hennepin (CASH Rose Jost, Bloomington Public Health Division Jane Leck, Hennepin County Library, Eden Prairie Branch Dick Merwin, Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department Mary Payne, Executive Director of Take Care: Support Services to Grandparents Raising Grandchildren Nancy Rowley, Richfield School Board Sylvia Stephens, Teacher for Richfield Intermediate School Debbie Wolking, Community Housing Development Corporation Gail Yarbrough, Parent from Bloomington Working Group #4 Task: Develop strategies for closing the gaps in preventions and early intervention services for families and children. Christine Bentley, Louise Whitbeck Fraser School, Inc. Ann Boerth, Vigilance Marilyn Cavara, Hennepin County Children and Family Services Department Lieutenant Dave Ericson, Bloomington Police Department Roger Grusznski, Director of Family & Children's Service South Hennepin Branch Sharon Johnson, Executive Director for Community Action For Suburban Hennepin (CASH) Rose Jost, Bloomington Public Health Division Terri Monk, Spartan Elementary School Yvonne Redmond - Brown, Richfield Public Schools Special Education Gale Reina, Social Worker for the Bloomington Schools Steve Richards, Minister for Children and Youth at Good Samaritan United Methodist Church Michael Sigrin, Side By Side Leo Treadway, Family Service Of Greater St. Paul Attachment B Working Group #5 Task: Develop recommendations to increase collaboration and linkages between agencies and to establish a structure and process to facilitate and implementation of the Family Services Collaborative recommendations. Karyn Arazi, Bloomington School Board Mary Ellen Barrett, Storefront/Youth Action James Bauman, Principal of Westwood Elementary School, Bloomington Timothy Connors, Superintendent of Bloomington Public Schools Nancy Delin, Edina Family Center Camillo DeSantis, Richfield Peg DuBord, REM Susan Freeman, VEAP (Volunteers Enlisted To Assist People) Gayle Hallin, Director of Bloomington Public Health Division Doris Karls, Dean of Students for Central Middle School, Eden Prairie Barb Kliest, Bloomington Human Services Division Donna McDonald, Gerard Treatment Program Vicki Oelj in, Augsburg Park Library Carol Olson, Edina Family Center Holly Weisberg, Side By Side Jeanne Zetah, Director of Eden Prairie Community Education Attachment C Participation Agreements of Partner Organizations South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Implemenation Grant Proposal 6128857604 FAMILY CENTER 820 P02 SEP 13 '95 10:40 Family :Serivices CO1100rative BLOOMINGT ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Proposed Minimum In Kind Resource Commitment'- In Kind Staff Support: .375 F1'E Family Advocate to staff local resource center 15 hours /week x $10.00/hour x 52 weeks 20% benefits .18 FTE School & Community Instructional Leader to staff local resource center 7 hours /week x $21.00 /hour x 52 weeks 20% benefits .6 FTE Youth & Family Coordinators - "link" to schools 12 coordinators x 2 hours /week x $13.00 /hour x 52 weeks 20% benefits 7800.00 1560.00 7644.00 1528.80 16,224.00 3244.80 .125 FTE District Staff F Ed., SHAPE, Social Workers, Counselors, Teachers, Administrators for (planning, coordinating, consulting, advising, training, governance, etc.) 5 hours /week x $30.00/hour (average ind"'I'ne_ benefits) x 52 weeks In Kind Materials, Supplies and Services: Parenting Resource Library (Family Center) Estimated Value of In Kind Support ff l6 0 Eden Prairie Schools Family Service Collaborative In Kind Contribution 85 -86 320 sq ft ® $15.70 = $5,024 Space: 90sgft 0 $15.70 = $1,413 $ 6,437 Phones: 2 ® 250 500 166 Annual charge: 2083 270 2 desks and file cabinet Copy charges up to 20,000 copies 1,000 2,500 Computer Coordination/Mana 2 hrs wk 48 wk ® $25 ® hr 2,400 (includes staff development S inservices) Clerical Support and Coordination 5,000 1,000 Access to IBM Training Lab 19,273 TTY network of education, building supervisior. Includes receptionist access to fax, � . custodian, access to Family Resource Center (toys, books, videos). Child Care for preschoolers when Family Center sibling care is in operation. c / � prL y /�;Y�sa X �O'� � ti' (Y'l��s usf'�a►►� — / %D �% � p•�� ��,�- ,ter - - -Tom = ZI.� 1?7- 3 Edina Family Center To: South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services From: Nancy Delin, Representative from the Edina Public Schools Date: September 14, 1995 Subject: Potential Contributed Resources for the Family Services Collaborative 1995 -96 from the Edina Public Schools Edina School District 273 Community Education • Staff for planning and coordination (10 hours/ mo for 12 months) $4,000 • Phone and computer 4,000 • Resource Center office space and furniture 6,400 (800 sq /ft by $8) • Family Resources library 10,000 Total $24,400 K- 12 • Staff for planning and coordination 3,000 Total $3,000 Thank you! c: Ken Dragseth Doug Johnson Rick Beresford mot` 1 %47L..'�Z ^t"L���J'� li�� � .}, { ^�Is� �':i,• -•� Lid: ;:^••�� - �w.�� ar cl<<Y W t 6.3'1; ►•J - DLit 000 Ct.18 uUY Uu8►.r rd; 2'.;, 1 i,D_ -c •' S3S _ n lal3!.»lN •,••� �. ••,6ttj �q ir.T�2J;.r,• ;itt.� d laF. ut: use • CRS t t FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON - HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION PROPOSED MINIMUM IN KIND RESOURCE COMMITMENT: Ti Kind ,Staff 0-unport F timated Value .38 FTE Information and Referral Support Staff (includes maintaining Resource Library) $15,925.51 (15 hours per week @ $17.01/hour X 52 weeks + $2,657.71 Benefits) .25 FTE Technical Support Staff $12,402.07 (10 hours per week @ $19.21/hour X 52 weeks + $2,412.87 Benefits) .25 FTE Staffing and Coordination $15,088.10 (10 hours per week @ $23.36/hour X 52 weeks + $2,940.90 Benefits) in mind M tcrlals -Surly L1P, , and SemiceS $ 300.00 Graphics Resource Library Total Estimated Value of Proposed Minimum In Kind Support projcord\sherpa \fscsup.doc tKLUENtU Jtr I -+ !UY5 City of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -2230 Phone (612) 949 -8300 • TDD (612) 949 -8399 • Fax (612) 949 -8390 September 13, 1995 Jean Massey 5701 Normandale Road, Room 302 Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Jean: Eden Prairie will contribute about 120 hours of staff time to the Family Services Collaborative project over the next year. The total estimated value of this contribution to be included in the Work Plan Participation Agreement is $7,500. Sincerely Carl Jullie City Mangy 9 Recycled Paper To: Fax: From: Date: Pages: fax From the desk of... Susan Wohlrabe Administrative Assistant Gty of Edina 4ao I West 5Oth Street Edina, MN 55424 612827-8861 Fax 612/927 -7645 James Massey 922 -3081 Susan Wohlrabe September 13, 1995 1, including cover sheet. As you have requested, I am submitting Edina's value of contributed resources for the nine -month Work Plan regarding the Family Services Collaborative: approximately 100 hours which equals $2,072.00. CITY OF RICHFIELD Memorandum DATE: September 11, 1995 TO: Jean Massey, South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency FROM: James D. Prosser, City Manage SUBJECT: Family Services Collaborative In -Kind Contribution 10/1/95- 6/30/96 I. Staff time for planning and coordination of Regional activities of the Family Services $13,515 Collaborative (Human Services Planner /Coordinator) II.Staff time for planning and coordination of local activities of the Family Services $13,515 Collaborative (Human Services Planner /Coordinator) III.Staff time for other department staff (Public Safety, Community Development, $ 2.000 Community Services) TOTAL $29,030 South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services Bloomington o Eden Prairie o Edina o Richfield PROJECTED MINIMUM INKIND CONTRIBUTION FOR THE SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE BY SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY OCTOBER, 1995 - JUNE, 1996 1. Staff for planning, coordination, training, management support for the Support Hub: Total 1.029 FTEs x Average hourly rate of $19.24 = $41,173 2. Space for the Support Hub: $685 3. Materials, supplies, copying, postage: $600 Total minimum contribution: $42,458 09/14/95 5701 Normandale Road, Room 302, Edina, MN 55424 o Tel: (612) 922 -5999 Fax: (612) 922 -3081 COMMUNITY HEALTH SE R V I C E S' Bloomington �.. �� ; 1sore' e • Phone: (612)948 -8900 Edina � �� w�, � r Fax: (612)948 -8997 Richfield l` ATI! , MD: (612)948-8740 P R O T E C T I N G A N D P R O M O T I N G H E A L T H The City of Bloomington, Division of Health, provides public health services for the City of Bloomington as well as Edina and Richfield, through an annual purchase of service agreement. The following commitments of the Bloomington Health Division are dependent on the continuation of those agreements. With an expectation of the continuation of this agreement through 1996, the anticipated base commitment to the Family Services Collaborative is as follows: STAFF FTE's & FINANCIAL EQUIVALENTS for 1995 - 1996 Staff for Planning /Coordinating and Training FSC Collaborative Bloomington Specific Edina Specific Richfield Specific Total Total FTE's 0.075 0.075 0.05 0.05 0.25 Total Financial Equivalent 5,238 5,238 3,492 3,492 17,460 EXPECTED STAFF FTE's & FINANCIAL EQUIVALENTS FOR FUTURE RESOURCE CENTERS Staff for Resource Centers FSC Collaborative Bloomington Specific Edina Specific Richfield Specific Total Total FTE's 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 Total Financial Equivalent 1 0 1 9,889 1 9,889 1 9,889 1 29,667 r Gayle Hallin, RN, MPH Health Administrator 09/14/95 PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER • 1900 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington. MN 55431 -3095 Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer SEP -14 -1995 15 :23 HENN COUNTY ADM emo .I. V . DATE: September 14, 1995 3488228 P.01i01 TO: Jeanne Massey. South Hennepin Regional Planning j FROM: Rex iioltemer, Hennepin County Community Initiatives SUBJECT: Resource Contributions to South Hennepin FSC The Children & Family Services Department (C &FS) has determined that the following staff could be located within the proposed South Hennepin Resource Center Network. The roles and responsibilities of these staff will need to be clearly defined prior to relocation. However. I am confident that we can mutually agree on roles and responsibilities that will effectively address both the needs of Hennepin County and the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. 1.0 FTE Principal Social Worker 1.0 FTE Senior Social Worker 1.0 FTE Social Worker 2.0 FTE Financial Case Aides .5 FTE Social Work Unit Supervisor .1 FTE Planning and Coordination Staffing from C &FS and Community Initiatives The approximate value of these staff is $246,596 per year. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact the at 348 -3456. Thanks. September 7, 1995 TO: Jeanne Massey FROM: Roger Grusmski RE: Family Services Collaborative Integrated Funding As part of Family & Children's Service's efforts to collaborate with the SHeRPA's Family Services Collaborative, we would like to be considered as a possible joint resource center for Richfield and Bloomington. We would contribute an office for the resource center staff and access to a larger interview room (as- needed, but not exclusive to resource center). We also would provide some staff hours for the resource center coverage. Specific hours need to be determined based on need. We also would provide, initially, at least, access to fax, telephone, certain office furniture, equipment and some basic supplies. TOTAL P.02 Fdn- &Chilliei"s Service ot. T Y..,%EA% •.YT -%f4l .. PROPOSAL FOR JOINT RESOURCE CENTER FOR BLOONIINGTON/RICHFIELD Family & Children's Services has responded to the SHeRPA Family Services Collaborative's recommendations by offering to be a joint resource center for Richfield and Bloomington. We are currently planting to make some major changes at the South Hennepin Branch of FCS and hope to include plans for the resource center if both cities agree. We are in the planning stage currently, so this is a tentative proposal at this time. We are now discussing co-locating with Hennepin Faculty Associates (HFA) who wish to open a primary care clinic in Richfield/Bloomington. HFA is the physicians group of Hennepin County Medical Center. We are trying to find a site that is on the Richfield - Bloomington border. (Our lease ends January 31. 1996, so we will need to move from our current location) We are also planning to respond to the need for "after hours" services by providing increased hours of operation, possibly 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If we pursue this course, HFA might also open an urgent care center with extended hours. In addition, there may be an opportunity for some other county services to be located at this site, depending on the actual physical space. We would provide an office for the resource center, access to a larger interview /assessment room, use of fax, telephone, furniture, basic office supplies and some staffing. We also have installed a $300,000 computer system that is a fully - integrated data -based system operating in a UNIX environment. The server is at our downtown office and stand alones can be connected. We are using state-of -the -art software since this computer became operational in July, 1995. This may be helpful in implementing the basic data system. . FCS currently provides considerable information and referral services as well as assessment, intakes and case management. Our South Hennepin Branch serves clients primarily from Richfield and Bloomington. We work cooperatively for both cities, both school districts and with other providers in South Hennepin. We are committed to helping families receive and benefit from the services they need. We are excited about the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative's recommendations and will contribute what we can . to successfully strengthen the families in Richfield and Bloomington. David sanders Chairpe180111 Terrance J Steen Pres.de"t Officers: Be;le Davenport James T. Doudiet Paul D. Grangeard LOROV J. Morgan JeanA Morison Richard A Teske Members Charles S. Anberso Charles E. Brown Eloon Brireuen Brvcc M. Carlson AI Ditir-ch Patti W. Frisch Velma Gilliam Toni D. Green Marlene Whi erabt Heloemo Rooney W. Jordan Kather"tC A. Low Andy MaCPhad Lucy R. McCarthy Lucy C- Mitchell Marlorre J. Petersc Nathaniel G. l'pner Jetlrav J. Rotsch Omar Schmidt Wm. K. Smith Allan H. Spear Eric C Stull David E. Wilbur. Jr ule Members. Chloe D. Acirman Bony M. Benjamin Gordon A Johnso Oran 0. Robbins If there are any questions or concerns about this proposal, please call Roger Grusznski, Family & Children's Service - South Hennepin Branch Director, at 885 -1262. AO�assA anal STFIENGTHENING r :MiLIES FOR C'J—c: 414 South Eighth Street LJke Str"a RrAnc.h Northwest Hennepin Branch South Hennepin Branch MinneADnlra, MN bb4U4 ;! 12b Eu3t Luke: Strcct 6900 7Ath Avenue Nonh 9801 Ouyurit Avenue SDUth ((5111 :l4U -/441 Minneapolis. MN 55406 BrooKlyn Park. MN 55445 Blt!uiiiii yttiii. MN 554.11 Fax 1612) 340-7620 (612) 729.0340 - (A171560 -4417 (6121884-7353 coauRa�na,�i� raA 1612) /'lei -2616 Fax (612) 660 4187 Fay (6t ?) RA4.9684 -Atinirf w — — — — — — — — . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — , 0 81 P. 03 Tri 92) Staffing $34,000 Includes partial F'TE4s for intake and referral work, clerical support and coordination, management services, and administrative committee work. (Exact staffing is difficult to determine at this time, however, we would need to provide the primary coordination of staffing from the other collaborative partners in addition to the direct services we would provide.) Facilities Includes the office for the resource center intake staff, and access to a larger interview room, as well as a copier, telephone, fax, computer, office supplies and furniture. Total resources provided by FCS $48'000 * * *F: \H0ME \21 \SHERPA \INKIN0.WK1 * ** STOREFRONT YOUTH /ACTION IN KIND CONTRIBUTION 1995 -1996 Personnel 520 hours 0 $30 $159600 Space 170 Sq. Ft. 0 $15 2,650 Phone 350 Furniture 600 Copy Charges 200 Computer Systems and software 3,000 Clerical Support 2,500 Administrative expense 1,012 Community Education and planning support 2,160 $27,072 Includes access to fax, SYA staff for consultation assistance, group rooms, and clerical support facilities. United Way of Minneapolis Area 104 South Elohth sum Ww"pM. Mlmbaot4 55404.1084 (812) 310.7400 Fa 340.7675 1995 BOARD OF DIRECTORS E=UnVE COMMrME Jam J. Raftr, thlD. Chu W me goad RonJaew tfioe chm Judo S. Corson Tranam Roaaw Givens Copetend $Me" meal Howard b erMi ie Put CIWr Board CamndtMe Chem Mann Sarmm Davd C Cos Wdwm M. Eft D. E. Murpny Katnryn H. TwA im ANArpe Members Rcben J. Dayton ;a %el A. Maugen Jean e. WNW David A. Koo Ma -Carat LANI&;d Theme R. McSumar Lawo A. Sund.n MEMBERS A,n H. Sal;*** Mary Egan Ourea RCaan L. debntr. CLU. ChFC Snamn sarles Barton Sanwa Petereon Burwell Ame D Carver M Yvonne Chm. FT..D. Rev. Pittard H. Coleman Tmow M. Croeoy. Jr. Eamd N, 'uaAw Dowd P. Early Hach Gros SCOCy c uene FrederrcK M. Orewt Dorn F. Grunrow Cad A. Hoe m'. Earl. David R. I+ubvre Mara J. MuOson Emtmr Re digon imps Da" J. K. KhKa Due D. Lam Kemedi A. Macke R dtard D. McFeriertd Rowed M. McKee Peter Mdmghle Erram S. M=k VNan JwWr& New FcMa Norm Dais R. Otsem Swat M. onourri Rowed D. Pone Lwnerd L. Prewd Sum L. Prat Ja:pirelw M. Re's Summit M. Roma Sts" W. Sarpar —"a SL Genus '+W September 14, 1995 Jeanne Massey South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency 5701 Normandale Road Edina MN 55424 Dear Jeanne: United Way of Minneapolis Area makes the following commitments to the South . Hennepin Family Services Collaborative during 1995 -96: .02 FTE - Representative to the Interim Advisory Council(Nathalie Pyle) Facilitate dialogue with United Way funded agencies that have services which the collaborative has identified as needed but not yet available in the South Hennepin communities. Explore how to expand and localize access to First Call For Help® resources for communities served by the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative. Using learnings from First Call for Help work with school districts, work with the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative to be ready to maximize FirstCallNet, a single source of health and human services information for the seven county metropolitan area which will be a widely accessible, easy to use, fully computerized network available in 1997. Sincerely, Nathalie Pyle Community Affairs Associate Director • -to can do together! Fairview r So>tti Ie HOSpital A Division ojFairrieu- L'J DATE: TO: FROM: 6401 M217ew Acrnrue.lk uth idlni� MN515 -kiS 2199 6!1.924 -RAW F"V 0 ll•Jl4•1012 MEMORANDUM September 11, 1995 Jeanne Massey South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Linda Packard SUBJECT: GRANT PROPOSAL FOR FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS Fairview Southdale Hospital would be able to provide to the Family Services Collaborative Ulu fulluwiug auPpmt: 1. Services of a grant writer to write grants ...................... $ 2,500.00 2. Consultation with the Fairview Information Services ............... $ 450.00 3. Possible funding through the Fairview Auxiliary ................. $20,000.00 4. Possible funding through the Fairview Foundation ................ $ 5,000.00 5. Participation of the Community Health Outreach Manager ........... $ 5.200.00 TOTAL: ........................................... $33,150.00 TOTAL P.02 f League of Minnesota Cities October 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: IX.B. 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 -8044 TO: Managers and Clerks (Please distribute a copy of these materials to your mayor and councilmembers) FROM: James F. Miller �.,.- Executive Direc RE: 1996 Policy Adoption Conference and Legislative Policies Enclosed is a copy of the 1996 City Policies as proposed by the League's policy committees and Board of Directors. These policies address significant city issues such as local government aid, annexation, tax increment financing, and transportation funding. The policy process was revamped last year with the goal of making policies more relevant and focused. As a result, all of the policy committees were given the opportunity to examine their respective subject areas anew, without consideration to previous policies. The revised process is described in more detail in the accompanying policy booklet. The League membership will vote on these policies as part of the LMC Policy Adoption Conference which will be held on Friday, November 17, 1995, at the Ramada Plaza, 12201 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka. (See map enclosed.) The accompanying ballot should be filled out and returned to Mary Diedrich by Monday, November 13, regardless of whether you will be attending the conference. The results will be tabulated and shared with those present on November 17 to help facilitate discussion. In order for League staff to plan properly for the meeting, please register as early as possible. We look forward to seeing all of you on November 17th. OVER AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYIAFFIRMATWE ACTION EMPLOYER i 12) 490 -5600 1-800- 925 -1122 TDD (612) 490 -9038 Fax(612)490-W-,2 K 494 If Carlson ar W pidgeclale � "a Slioppit�g Center N 694 1. 94 Hwy 55 Ramada Plaza Minneapolis West downtown edale a94 wa eta at�� Minneapolis Hwy 12 Iwy 1 C9 To /airport � 4114 35 E a� U o Proposed 1996 � City Policies � for legislative and � administrative action bA cd a League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 (612) 281 -1200 (800) 925 -1122 Fax(612)281 -1299 C 1995 League of Minnesota Cities All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Lqlr League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 (612) 281 -1200 (800) 925 -1122 Fax(612)281 -1299 LAIC League of Minnesota Cities October 25, 1995 Dear League Members: 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 -8044 I am pleased to submit the accompanying draft 1996 Legislative Policies for your consideration. The format is designed to identify the most important concerns of cities and to translate those concerns into legislative priorities. Rather than simply amending previously adopted policies, many of which had been in place for a number of years, the policy committees were asked to start with a clean slate. Their first task was to identify problems within their respective areas that cities face or are likely to face in the near future. Once there was agreement on the problem definitions, solutions, usually in the form of legislative initiatives or policies, were created. Your input is crucial to this process. The League needs your reaction to the definition of problems and the proposed solutions. With that input, along with comments received from the various policy committees, the League Board will be in the best position to make decisions about the content of the 1996 Legislative Action Agenda. On behalf of the Board of Directors and staff, please accept my sincere thank you for your contribution to this most important process. Sincerely, Karen Anderson League President Mayor, City of Minnetonka AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (612)490 -5600 1- 800.925 -1122 TDD (612) 490-9038 Fax(612)490 -0072 CONTENTS Letter from the League President General Policy Statement ................... ............................... iii LeagueStaff ............................. ............................... iv Legislative Policy Committee Members ....... ............................... v Policy Development Process ................ ............................... vii Statement of Intent ........................ ...:........................... viii PART 1­ 1996 POLICY GUIDELINES Improving Community Life CL -1. Livable Communities .............. ............................... 1 PART II -- 1996 CITY POLICIES Improving Fiscal Futures FF -1. Local Government Aid ......... ............................... . . . . 3 FF -2. Transfers of LGA/HACA to Schools .. ............................... 3 FF -3. HACA Growth ................... ............................... 4 FF -4. Levy Limits and Property Tax Freeze .. ............................... 4 FF -5. Circuit Breaker and Targeting on the Property Tax Statement ............. 4 ' FF -6. Constitutional Amendment for School Finance ......................... 5 FF -7. Taxation of Municipal Bond Interest .. ............................... 5 FF -8. City Fiscal Year .................. ............................... 5 FF -9. Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases ............................ 6 FF -10. Delinquent Property Tax Penalties ... ............................... 6 FF -11. Payments for Services to Tax- Exempt Property ......................... 7 FF -12. Basis of Tax Levies ................ ............................... 7 FF -13. Truth -in- Taxation ................. ............................... 7 FF -14. State Deductions from LGA ........ ............................... 8 FF -15. Reporting Requirements ........... ............................... 8 Improving Local Economies LE -1. Adequate Funding for Transportation . ............................... 9 LE -2. City Role in Telecommunications .... ............................... 10 LE -3. Tax Increment Financing ........... ............................... 12 LE -4. Economic Development Programs ... ............................... 12 LE -5. Growth Management and Annexation . ............................... 13 LE -6. Restrictions on Revenue to Pay LGA/HACA Penalties .................. 15 LE -7. Housing ........................ ............................... 15 1995 City Policies i LE -8. State Aid for Urban Road Systems .... ............................... 16 LE -9. City Cooperation With Counties and Schools in Economic Development .... 16 LE -10. State Aid Roads in Cities Under 5,000 ............................... 17 LE -11. Turnbacks of County and State Roads . ............................... 18 LE -12. Cooperation Between Counties and Cities Over County Roads Within Cities . 18 LE -13. Nuclear Waste Management ......... ............................... 19 Improving Service Delivery SD -1. Redesigning and Reinventing Government ............................ 20 SD -2. Unfunded Mandates ............... ............................... 21 SD -3. Civil Liability of Local Governments . ............................... 22 SD -4. Environmental Protection .......... ............................... 23 SD -5. Personnel ....................... ............................... 25 SD -6. Absentee Voting .................. ............................... 26 SD -7. Statewide Voter Registration System: Access and Voter Registration Cards .. 27 SD -8. Write -in Candidates ............... ............................... 28 SD -9. Election Judge Appointments ....... ............................... 28 SD -10. Local Election Authority ........... ............................... 29 SD -11. Restricting Campaign Signs Near Polling Places ....................... 29 ii League of Minnesota Cities General Policy Statement One of the most important purposes of the League of Minnesota Cities is to serve as a vehicle for cities to define common problems and develop policies and proposals to solve those problems. The League of Minnesota Cities represents 811 of Minnesota's 854 cities as well as 11 urban towns and 24 special districts. All sizes of communities are represented among the League's members (the largest nonmember city has a population of 149) and each region of the state is represented. The policies that follow are directed at specific city issues. Two principles guide the development of all League policies. 1. There is a need for a governmental system which allows flexibility and authority for cities to meet challenges of governing and providing citizens with services while at the same time protecting cities from unfunded or underfunded mandates, liability or other financial risk, and restrictions on local control; and 2. The financial and technical requirements for governing and providing services necessitate a continuing and strengthened partnership with federal, state, and local governments. This partnership particularly in the areas of finance, development, housing, environment, and transportation is critical for the successful operation of Minnesota's cities and the well -being of city residents. 1996 City Policies iii LEAGUE STAFF WORKING WITH STATE AND FEDERAL ISSUES Jim Miller, Executive Director Mandates Gary Carlson, Director of Intergovernmental Relations General revenue sources for cities including aid to cities and the property tax system, fiscal administration of cities, economic development and redevelopment, transportation Duke Addicks, Director of Member Services Policy formulation, fiscal issues, government innovation and cooperation Stan Peskar, General Counsel Pensions Joel Jamnik, Senior Intergovernmental Relations Representative Growth management and land use, environmental protection, personnel and labor relations, public safety, general municipal governance, transportation Ann Higgins, Intergovernmental Relations Representative Telecommunications, housing, elections and ethics, utility service districts, transportation Andrea Atherton, Intergovernmental Relations Representative Tax increment financing, land use, ethics, economic development and redevelopment, fiscal issues, housing iv League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policy Committee Members Improving Community Life Robert Benke, Chair, Mayor, New Brighton Greg Sparks, Vice Chair, City Administrator, Worthington Jeanne Andre, Assistant to Manager /HRA Coordinator, Golden Valley Jack Barlow, Councilmember, Lauderdale Jan Callison, Councilmember, Minnetonka Joan Campbell, Councilmember, Minneapolis Kathleen Carmody, Councilmember, Brooklyn Center John Doyle, Councilmember, Marshall Sharon Feess, Councilmember, Brooklyn Park Dorothy Fleming, Councilmember, St. Anthony Sue Gehrz, Councilmember, Falcon Heights Wendy Gorham, Councilmember, Mora Fran Hesch, Councilmember, Hopkins Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley Sandy Masin, Councilmember, Eagan Mac McBride, Finance Director, St. Louis Park Roberta Megard, Councilmember, St. Paul Nancy Mikitta, Council President, Red Wing Mari Moen, Councilmember, Oakdale Deb Moran, Councilmember, Burnsville Larry Nicholson, Councilmember, Moorhead Wayne Oak, Mayor, Sandstone Joy Robb, Mayor, Robbinsdale Jolie Sasseville, Public Information Officer, Fergus Falls Betty Sindt, Councilmember, Lakeville Improving Fiscal Futures Alcuin Ringsmuth, Chair, Mayor, Waite Park Chuck Armstrong, Intergovernmental Relations Director, St. Paul William Bassett, City Manager, Mankato Lynn Becklin, Councilmember, Cambridge Doug Bunkers, City Administrator, Luverne Edward Burrell, Finance Director, Roseville Thomas Burt, City Administrator, Rosemount Gino Businaro, Finance Director, Mound Dave Childs, City Manager, Minnetonka Terry Dussault, Assistant to City Manager, Blaine Dan Faust, Finance Director, Maplewood Steve Froehlich, Councilmember, Lauderdale Mary Gover, Councilmember, St. Peter Alvin Gruis, Councilmember, Rushmore Francis Hagen, City Manager, Robbinsdale Lyle .Hanks, Mayor, St. Louis Park Terri Heaton, Deputy Director Admininistrative Services, Bloomington Patrick Hentges, City Manager, Columbia Heights Blaine Hill, Clerk- Treasurer, Breckenridge Susan Hoyt, City Administrator, Falcon Heights Greg Isaackson, Clerk- Administrator - Treasurer, Cottonwood Barbara Jeanetta, Assistant to City Manager, New Brighton Larry Jerviss, City Administrator, Houston Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor, Burnsville Jim Keinath, City Administrator, Circle Pines Duane Knutson, Mayor, Fertile Sharon Legg, Finance Director, Coon Rapids Millie MacLeod, Councilmember, Moorhead Steven Mielke, City Manager, Hopkins Ed Mlynar, Mayor, Lester Prairie John Moir, City Finance Officer, Minneapolis Gary Neumann, Assistant City Administrator, Rochester Karl Nollenberger, Chief Administrative Officer, Duluth Steve Okins, Finance Director, Willmar Steve Perkins, Council Administrator, Red Wing John Remkus, Finance Director, West St. Paul David Schornack, City Administrator, Fairmont James Smith, Councilmember, Independence Peter Stolley, City Administrator, Northfield David Stutelberg, Finance Director, St. Peter David Urbia, City Administrator, Blue Earth Daniel Urshan, Mayor, Hermantown Gene VanOverbeke, Finance Director -City Clerk, Eagan Dan Vogt, City Administrator, Brainerd Improving Local Economies Kevin Frazell, Chair, City Administrator, Cottage Grove Rosemary Given Amble, Vice Chair, Councilmember, Bemidji Roberta Anderson, City Administrator, Norwood Chuck Armstrong, Intergovernmental Relations Director, St. Paul Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator, Mounds View Jerry Bohnsack, City Administrator /Clerk, New Prague Gerald Brever, City Administrator, Staples Ralph Campbell, Communications Director, Edina Bonnie Carlson, Asstistant City Manager, Prior Lake 1996 City Policies v Romeo Cyr, Mayor, Red Wing James Daniels, Administrator, Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, Excelsior Dan Donahue, City Manager, New Hope Joe Enge, Councilmember, Brooklyn Park JoAnne Foust, Community Development Director, St. Peter Brian Fritsinger, Community Development Director, Arden Hills Jim Froehle, Public Information Specialist, Fridley Matt Fulton, City Manager, New Brighton Tom Hansen, Deputy City Manager, Burnsville Tom Harmening, Community Development Director, Hopkins Duane Hebert, City Administrator, Renville Jon Hohenstein, Assistant to Administrator, Eagan Jim Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk, Shorewood Matthew Hylen, City Administrator, Hector Ron Johnson, Administrator - Clerk- Treasurer, Zumbrota Richard Krier, City Planner, Greenfield Harry Lyon, Jr., Councilmember, North St. Paul Michael Martin, Community Development Director, Caledonia Jean McConnell, Councilmember, Rochester Charles Meyer, City Manager, St. Louis Park Robert Morgan, City Administrator, Young America Jim Norman, City Manager, Montevideo John O'Rourke, Mayor, Austin Bruce Peterson, Community Development Director, Willmar Mike Reardon, Cable Coordinator, Burnsville and Eagan Kent Robbins, Council Aide, Minneapolis Steve Sarkozy, City Manager, Roseville Terry Schneider, Councilmember, Minnetonka Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator, Ramsey Doug Schulze, City Administrator, Sandstone Robert Skillings, Councilmember, New Ulm Marsha Soucheray, Councilmember, Shoreview Ginny Sterling, Councilmember, Apple Valley Terry Stone, Mayor, Madelia Robert Therres, City Administrator-Clerk- Treasurer, Sartell William Thompson, Mayor, Coon Rapids Joy Tierney, Mayor, Plymouth Craig Waldron, City Administrator /Clerk, Oakdale Ron Wasmund, Community Development Director, Rosemount Tom Wenner, City Attorney - -Rice, Richmond, Royalton, Rockville, Pierze Denny Wilde, City Administrator, Paynesville Betty Zachmann, Clerk- Treasurer, Winsted Bob Zagaros, Councilmember, Robbinsdale Improving Service Delivery Joyce Twistol, Chair, Clerk/Personnel Director, Blaine Neill Atkins, Councilmember, Duluth Richard Bradford, Administrative Superintendent, Hoyt Lakes Francene Clark/Leisinger, City Clerk, Mound Patricia Crawford, Clerk- Treasurer, Motley Jerry Dulgar, City Manager, Crystal Thomas Ferber, City Clerk, Richfield Kelly Frawley, Assistant Administrator, Cottage Grove Theresa Goble, Deputy City Clerk, Brainerd Jean Gramling, Administrative Assistant, Savage Mary Helen Guzek, Intergovernmental Relations Assistant, St. Paul Ken Hartung, City Administrator, Bayport Les Heitke, Mayor, Willmar Sue Hess, Councilmember, St. Cloud Marvin Johnson, Mayor, Independence Mike Johnson, City Administrator, Marshall Daniel Jordet, City Administrator, St. Peter Mark Karnowski, City Administrator, Lindstrom Greg Konat, City Manager, Burnsville Laura Kushner, Assistant City Manager, Crystal Sharon Leintz, City Clerk, Maple Lake Ann Lenczewski, Councilmember, Bloomington Joe Lynch, City Administrator, Long Lake Cathy Magnus, Clerk/Administrator, Slayton Myrna Maikkula, City Clerk, Brooklyn Park Mark Nagel, City Manager, Anoka Desyl Peterson, City Attorney, Minnetonka Dawn Postudensek, Administrative Intern, Mounds View Charlotte Samuelson, Councilmember, New Brighton Dan Scott, City Manager, North St. Paul Jeanette Sobania, Personnel Coordinator, Plymouth Glenda Spiotta, Administrator, Carver Joyce Swadner, Director of Elections, Minneapolis Blair Tremere, Mayor, Golden Valley Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator, Champlin Mark Voxland, Councilmember, Moorhead Susan Walsh, Clerk, Rosemount Liz Witt, Deputy Clerk/Admininistrative Assistant, Eagan Krista Witty, MVCOG Executive Director. Mankato Wally Wysopal, Assistant to Manager /Personnel Officer, St. Louis Park vi League of Minnesota Cities League of Minnesota Cities Policy Development Process The League's policy development process has taken place over the past five months. The process began with a member survey of priority issues facing city officials. The process will not end with the policy adoption conference. The committees will schedule additional meetings during the upcoming legislative session to discuss additional issues, develop alternative solutions and to discuss strategies to implement the League's policies. Listed below is a brief chronology of the major events in the policy development process. At each step, members have the opportunity to participate in the development process. April /May The League solicits members for ideas and problems. A survey at the Annual Conference allows members to formally suggest topics. June The League President accepts applications for committees and appoints policy committee members. The policy committees are: Improving Community Life Committee Improving Fiscal Futures Committee Improving Local Economies Improving Service Delivery July Committees meet to discuss issues raised in member survey. Commitees can also form task forces to more thoroughly study specific issues. Task forces can include noncity members with a knowledge of the focus issue. August Committees and task forces meet to discuss issues and problems, accept through testimony and develop policy statements. September October Legislative Committee meets to finalize policies. The Legislative Committee is comprised of the League's Board of Directors and the chairs of the four League policy committees. November Policy Adoption Conference. Members hae the opportunity to discuss the draft policies, propose changes, and suggest additional policies for membership consideration. December The Board adopts the Legislative Action Plan, based on input from the Policy Adoption Conference. January Legislative Session. During the session, the policy committees and task forces through will continue to meet on issues and strategies. Members can assist the League's May legislative efforts by volunteering to contact legislators on the variety of issues of interest to our cities. 1996 City Policies vii STATEMENT OF INTENT There are many problems which limit the effectiveness of city government to improve community life, improve the fiscal future and service delivery of city government, and to improve the local economy. What follows are statements of the problems facing cities and the solutions proposed to help resolve these problems. These statements of problems and proposed solutions form the policy of the League of Minnesota Cities. Additional and alternative solutions to these problems may be proposed after the Policy Adoption Conference and the members of the League authorize its Board of Directors to consider and support additional or alternative solutions, if necessary, to resolve the problems identified in this policy statement. Viii League of Minnesota Cities Part I 1996 Policy Guidelines IMPROVING CommuNITY LIFE CL -1. Liveable Communities To the greatest extent possible, legislation affecting communities at the state and federal level should enhance, not diminish, the ability of citizens, businesses, and local governments to work together in partnership to make every community "livable." PROBLEM. Cities in Minnesota are at various stages in meeting the goal of being "livable communities. " SOLUTION. The definition of a 'livable community" below will be used to evaluate proposed legislation to determine whether or not it advances the goal of enabling all Minnesota cities to become livable communities. It should also be used by cities to evaluate their progress toward the goal of becoming livable communities. A LIVABLE CONi1VIMTY IS: WHERE PEOPLE OF ALL AGES • share a core of common values including valuing diversity, respect for each other, and good citizenship • feel: * safe • a sense of belonging • welcome • engage in life -long learning activities that: * prepare them for responsible citizenship * enhance the enjoyment of life * prepare them for changing job markets • participate in the decision - making process of community leaders • celebrate community • want to make their home • have access to: * good paying jobs * adequate and affordable housing 1996 City Policies 1 • choice of efficient transportation systems including transit, pedestrians, and bicycles • gathering places • desired information • choice of cultural and recreational activities • affordable goods and services, including health care • are involved in the nurturing of children • care about their homes, community, and the environment • get to know each other • have the benefit of strong family support and nurturing adults • WHERE LOCAL GOVERNMENT • is responsive to the needs of its citizens • is actively supported by enthusiastic volunteers • is open and user friendly • encourages and implements cooperation and collaboration • provides and maintains an adequate infrastructure to meet local needs • educates citizens on local, regional, and state issues • informs and communicates with citizens to foster participation in public policy decision - making • participates in youth development 2 League of Minnesota Cities Part II 1996 City Policies Improving Fiscal Futures 1 FF -1. Local Government Aid 2 Problem: Although the LGA inflation index established by the 1994 Legislature will 3 ensure modest growth in the LGA appropriation, it will only maintain the program at a 4 constant dollar level. This will not reverse the trend toward increased city reliance on the 5 property tax and rapid property tax growth. 6 Solution: The implicit price deflator index should continue to be used to maintain 7 LGA at a constant, inflation- adjusted level. In addition, lawmakers should provide 8 additional state resources for further increases in LGA to reverse the rapid growth in 9 the reliance on the property tax. 10 FF -2. Transfers of LGA/HACA to Schools 11 Problem: Past shifts of city LGA and HACA to schools provided only imaginary relief 12 from rapidly rising school property taxes. Any additional shift of city LGA and HACA 13 will likely have a similar impact on future school property taxes. Also, new shifts will 14 increase the tax rate disparities between cities and townships and irreparably damage the 15 equalization benefit of LGA and HACA. 16 Solution: Any increase in the state's share of school revenues should come from 17 sources other than further transfers from city property tax relief programs. 1996 City Policies 3 1 FF -3. HACA Growth 2 Problem: Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid for cities does not increase as the 3 number of benefited properties increases. As a result, property tax relief for new parcels 4 is actually provided by shifting taxes to other property owners. In addition, the property 5 tax relief provided through HACA is not adjusted to keep pace with inflation. 6 Solution: The household growth adjustment should be reinstated and an inflationary 7 adjustment should be established for future city HACA distributions. 8 FF4. Levy Limits and Property Tax Freeze 9 Problem: In the past, levy limits have proven to be an ineffective and inefficient way to 10 limit property tax growth. Control of property taxes through the local budget process and 11 taxation hearings provides a more effective method of oversight. 12 Solution: Levy limits or a property tax freeze should not be imposed on cities. 13 FF -5. Circuit Breaker and Targeting on the Property Tax Statement 14 Problem: Beginning in 1998, the circuit breaker and targeting payments which are 15 currently made directly to individuals will be converted to a property tax statement credit 16 and payments will be made directly to local units of government. As such, the funding 17 for the program could be reduced without directly impacting the taxpayer but with 18 substantial financial impact on local units of government. 19 Solution: The circuit breaker should remain a direct payment to taxpayers. The 20 1995 law should be repealed. 4 League of Minnesota Cities 1 FF -6. Constitutional Amendment for School Finance 2 Problem: Legislative leaders are discussing a vague constitutional amendment that would 3 allow the voters to decide if K -12 schools should be financed with property taxes. 4 Solution: Any constitutional amendment to define the state's commitment to schools 5 must specifically identify what source of revenue will finance the additional 6 commitment to schools. In addition, the amendment must guarantee that any 7 additional state resources for schools will translate into an actual overall reduced 8 reliance on the property tax and not adversely affect the quality of education in 9 Minnesota. 10 FF -7. Taxation of Municipal Bond Interest 11 Problem: The state law that grants a tax exemption for municipal bond interest is being 12 reviewed and could be repealed. A repeal of this exemption will raise borrowing costs for 13 cities at a time when budgets are extremely tight and property tax increases are 14 unacceptable to the taxpayer. 15 Solution: The state should maintain the tax exemption for municipal bond interest 16 income. 17 FF -8. City Fiscal Year 18 Problem: The fiscal years for the state and cities are offset by 6 months. The state fiscal 19 year begins on July 1 while the city fiscal year begins on January 1. Lawmakers have 20 proposed changing the city fiscal year to coincide with the state. Such a change, while 1996 City Policies 5 1 providing questionable benefits for cities, would no longer correspond with the current 2 property tax cycle, impair historical comparisons of data, force cities to retool accounting 3 systems, and could result in state funding gaps. 4 Solution: The state should not change the city fiscal year to coincide with the state 5 fiscal year. 6 FF -9. Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases 7 Problem: In 1992, the Legislature repealed the sales tax exemption for local government 8 purchases. This action increased the costs for local governments and local property taxes 9 by nearly $70 million. This repeal has effectively increased local property taxes to 10 finance state operations. 11 Solution: The state should reinstate the sales tax exemption for all local government 12 purchases. 13 FF -10. Delinquent Property Tax Penalties 14 Problem: Although city finances are affected by property tax delinquencies, cities do not 15 receive any associated penalties and interest on these delinquencies. Penalties and interest 16 are split evenly between counties and schools. 17 Solution: Cities should receive their pro -rata share of all penalties and interest 18 collected on delinquent property taxes. 6 League of Minnesota Cities 1 FF -11. Payments for Services to Tax - Exempt Property 2 Problem: Taxable property in many cities is being acquired by nonprofit and government 3 entities. Converting the property to tax- exempt status can lead to a serious tax base 4 erosion without any corresponding reduction in the service needs created by the property. 5 Solution: Cities should be allowed to collect payments in -lieu of property taxes or 6 special assessments from nonconstitutionally exempt property owners. 7 FF -12. Basis of Tax Levies (NOTE: At the October 19 meeting, the Legislative 8 Committee authorized staff to draft language consistent with committee discussion to 9 clarify the policy. The draft language will be presented to the November 16 meeting of 10 the Board of Directors for their approval and submitted to the membership for 11 consideration at the Policy Adoption Conference on November 17.) 12 Problem: Applying any levies to market value, adds complexity to the property tax 13 system and confuses taxpayers. 14 Solution: All property taxes should be based on the same tax base. 15 FF -13. Truth -in- Taxation 16 Problem: The Legislature has mandated how property tax relief is calculated on tax 17 statements. These calculations have no relationship to actual local receipts for Homestead 18 and Agricultural Credit Aid. 19 Solution: In the spirit of real truth -in- taxation, property tax statements should 20 accurately reflect the actual amount of HACA benefiting each individual property 21 owner. 1996 City Policies 7 I FF -14. State Deductions from LGA 2 Problem: State administrative costs are deducted from the LGA appropriation. This 3 reduces the property tax relief provided by LGA and creates hidden appropriations for 4 state agencies. 5 Solution: All appropriations that fund state operations from LGA resources should 6 be repealed. 7 FF -15. Reporting Requirements 8 Problem: Budget and financial reporting requirements imposed on cities by the state often 9 result in duplication and additional costs. Solution: Additional requirements for reporting and advertising financial and budget information should be carefully weighed to balance the validity of the state's need for additional information with the costs and burdens of compiling and submitting this information. In addition, all state agencies should be aware of the information already required by others to avoid duplication of reporting requirements. 8 League of Minnesota Cities Improving Local Economies 1 LE -1. Adequate Funding for Transportation 2 Problem: Current funding for roads and for transit systems across all government levels 3 in the state is not adequate. 4 Solution: Minnesota should value, and adequately fund, all transportation systems in 5 the state. The state needs to provide an objective basis to determine the complete 6 needs of the road and transit systems, their present condition, and their impact on the 7 economic health of the state. This should include acknowledgement that delaying 8 current expenditures will increase costs in the future. Cities support an increase in 9 the gas tax and urge the Legislature to institute additional revenue sources that can 10 be dedicated to transportation programs. Cities should receive revenues necessary to 11 meet present and future transportation needs. If funding does not come from the 12 state, cities should have funding options available to them to raise the dollars 13 necessary to adequately fund roads and transit. 14 With the exception of funding for the state patrol, all nontransportation programs 15 should be funded from a source other than the highway user distribution fund. The 16 revenues of the highway user distribution fund are collected from transportation 17 users and should be dedicated to transportation- related services. 1996 City Policies 9 1 LE -2. City Role in Telecommunications 2 Problem: State and local response to federal and state telecommunications deregulation 3 and the convergence of information technologies has been largely unfocused. 4 Policymakers, regulators, telecommunications providers, and users have not given 5 sufficient attention to the importance of involving cities in designing local infrastructure to 6 provide universal access and services to create a community- based, interconnected 7 information infrastructure. 8 Solution: Cities must play a direct role in partnership with state and local 9 government entities, schools, libraries, higher educational institutions, 10 telecommunications service providers, and community residents to design local, 11 regional, and statewide information infrastructure. The goal of such endeavors 12 should be to assure that the public and communities throughout the state can improve 13 delivery of services, enlarge educational and economic opportunities, and assure that 14 public access and public space is available to connect citizens with their government. 15 The League recommends that the following actions be taken to implement these 16 objectives: 17 • include representatives of rural areas and small businesses in the development 18 of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) rules on competitive entry 19 of local and long - distance telecommunications services; 20 • work with the Federal Communications Commission and the Minnesota Public 21 Utilities Commission to urge adoption of uniform technical and service 22 standards for information infrastructure construction and operation; 23 • work with the Minnesota Department of Public Service to assure that the 10 League of Minnesota Cities 1 studies of municipal franchise fees and public access conducted by the 2 department are thorough and accurate and that cities are kept informed of the 3 analysis as well as the timely reporting of results to the Legislature; 4 • urge Congress and the Legislature to uphold local authority to require 5 telecommunications service providers to obtain permits; follow standards for 6 installation, replacement, and removal of facilities and equipment; and to 7 obtain from those providers a fair and just and appropriate level of 8 compensation for continued use of the public right -of -way which is 9 competitively neutral and reflects market conditions and actual cost of 10 delivering services at the local level; 11 • broaden the definition of universal service to include interoperability and 12 open architecture for all information and communications services offered by 13 telecommunications companies and service providers; 14 • identify universal access as the state's highest priority for development of a 15 statewide telecommunications plan to assure that community and regional 16 information infrastructure is designed and operated to meet local needs, 17 including maintenance of public access services; and 18 • increase the understanding of city officials, the public, and business owners 19 about the benefits and importance of information technologies and services 20 and to develop leadership and broad community and economic development 21 partnerships at the local level. 1996 City Policies 11 1 LE -3. Tax Increment Financing 2 Problem: The LGA /HACA aid penalty and recent legislative reforms have significantly 3 dampened the use of tax increment financing. Despite changes enacted in 1995 that 4 provided an alternative to the LGA/HACA penalty, many cities remain unable to use tax 5 increment financing to encourage development and redevelopment. Any property tax 6 reform proposals could adversely affect the financial viability of existing tax increment 7 financing districts and the security of outstanding bonds. 8 Solution: 9 The Legislature should not make further restrictive changes to the tax increment 10 statutes until the impacts of past changes can be thoroughly evaluated. The 11 Legislature should also study tax increment financing to see if the restrictions are 12 unfairly impacting certain cities. If inequities or other barriers are discovered, the 13 Legislature should provide limited exceptions or specific waivers to allow for equal 14 access to the tax increment tool. Any property tax reform proposal must include a 15 provision to hold harmless existing tax increment financing districts. 16 LE4. Economic Development Programs 17 Problem: The Economic Recovery Grant program is not adequately funded. The state 18 does not authorize an adequate slate of tools for local governments to assist job creation, 19 redevelop blight and decay, and provide adequate housing choices. Cities are not well 20 equipped to compete nationally and internationally for business development. 12 League of Minnesota Cities I Solutions: 2 • Any LGA/HACA penalty revenues should be contributed to the Economic 3 Recovery Grant Program. These funds would then be available for cities to 4 retain businesses in the state and to attract business looking to relocate from 5 other states. 6 • The Economic Recovery Grant Program should be continued and clear rules 7 established to govern its use. The state and federal funds that fund this 8 program should also be allocated throughout the year to help ensure that 9 projects across the state have access to the grants. 10 • Cities should be given authority for property tax abatements as another 11 economic development tool. 12 • The state should continue its commitment to clean up non- Superfund sites in 13 order to encourage and facilitate economic development. 14 • Congress should remove the caps that have been placed on Industrial 15 Development Bonds and acknowledge that the extensive eligibility 16 requirements now adequately limit their use. 17 LE -5. Growth Management and Annexation 18 Problem: Unplanned and uncontrolled urban growth has a negative environmental, fiscal, 19 and governmental impact for cities, counties, and state governments because it increases 20 the costs of providing government services and results in the loss of natural resource areas 21 and prime agricultural land. 1996 City Policies 13 1 Solutions: The League believes that the existing framework for guiding growth and 2 development primarily through local plans and controls adopted by local governments 3 should form the basis of a statewide planning policy and that the state should not 4 adopt a comprehensive statewide planning process. Rather, the state should: 5 • provide additional financial and technical assistance to local governments for 6 cooperative planning and growth management issues, particularly where new 7 comprehensive plans have been mandated by the Legislature; 8 • clearly establish the public purposes served by existing statewide controls such 9 as shoreland zoning and wetlands conservation; clarify, simplify, and 10 streamline these controls; eliminate duplication in their administration; and 11 fully defend and hold harmless any local government sued for a "taking" as a 12 result of executing state land use policies; 13 • give cities broader authority to extend their zoning, subdivision, and other 14 land use controls up to two miles outside the city's boundaries regardless of 15 the existence of county or township controls, in order to ensure conformance 16 with city facilities and services; 17 • clearly define and differentiate between urban and rural development and 18 restrict urban growth outside city boundaries; 19 • repeal the authority of the pollution control commissioner to require cities to 20 provide city services absent full inclusion of the affected property within the 21 community through annexation; 22 • require the Metropolitan Council to seek cooperation from the State of 23 Wisconsin and counties (both Minnesota and Wisconsin) surrounding the 14 League of Minnesota Cities 1 metropolitan area to ensure responsible and controlled development, study 2 expansion of Metropolitan Council authority in surrounding counties, and 3 examine the positive and negative impacts of mandatory regional or local land 4 use controls and state - imposed development standards; and 5 • facilitate the annexation of urban land to cities by amending state statutes 6 regulating annexation to make it easier for cities to annex developed or 7 developing land within unincorporated areas. 8 LE -6. Restrictions on Revenue to Pay LGA /HACA Penalties 9 Problem: There are many restrictions on the sources of revenue available for cities to 10 use to pay the LGA /HACA penalty that is imposed on most new TIF districts. 11 Solution: If the LGA /HACA penalty is intended to reimburse the state for additional 12 costs for the school aid program, state restrictions on the source of the "penalty" are 13 not appropriate. There should be no limitations on the city's payment of the penalty; 14 tax increments, developer participation, or other sources should be eligible. 15 LE -7. Housing 16 Problem: The availability and affordability of housing remains a problem throughout 17 Minnesota. Further, the condition of some houses negatively affects neighboring 18 properties. 19 Solutions: 20 • Federal and state financial resources should be committed to promote housing 21 opportunities for low- and moderate - income citizens. 1996 City Policies 15 1 • The creation of a statewide housing maintenance code and streamlined 2 enforcement mechanism should be studied and implemented if appropriate. 3 • Mortgage foreclosure and redemption should be streamlined and the 4 redemption period shortened to facilitate the resale, improvement, or removal 5 of abandoned or nuisance properties. 6 LE -8. State Aid for Urban Road Systems 7 Problem: Current rules governing municipal state aid expenditures are restricting the 8 efficient use of these funds and do not adequately acknowledge the constraints of road 9 systems in urban city environments. 10 Solution: Rules affecting the municipal state aid system need to be changed to 11 acknowledge the technical and practical restrictions on construction and 12 reconstruction of urban road systems. New municipal state aid design standards 13 should not apply to reconstruction of existing state aid streets that were originally 14 constructed under different standards. Future changes to state aid rules should 15 improve the balance of elected officials and engineering professionals in the decision- 16 making process. 17 LE -9. City Cooperation With Counties and Schools in Economic 18 Development 19 Problem: Counties and schools frequently want to play a greater role in cities' 20 development decisions. 16 League of Minnesota Cities 1 Solution: The current "review and comment" requirements are an appropriate 2 mechanism to involve schools and counties in city economic development efforts. 3 LE -10. State Aid Roads in Cities Under 5,000 4 Problem: Cities under 5,000 population do not receive any nonproperty tax funds for 5 their collector and arterial streets. 6 Solution: State statute should be modified to encourage cooperation and improved L 7 transportation systems by allowing contiguous cities that jointly represent a combined 8 population of 5,000 or more to be eligible for Municipal State Aid (M.S.A.). 9 Participating cities would enter into a formal joint powers agreement and establish a 10 joint budget that would be governed by a board of elected officials. Cities that 11 participated in this joint entity would not be required to undertake any formal 12 consolidation activities. 13 Cities under 5,000 population that were not eligible for M.S.A. through this 14 cooperative agreement practice should be able to use county municipal accounts and 15 the five percent account of the highway user distribution fund. 16 Uses of county municipal accounts should be statutorily modified so that counties can 17 dedicate these funds for local arterials and collector streets within cities under 5,000 18 population. In addition, the five percent set -aside account in the highway user 19 distribution fund should be used to meet this funding gap. 1996 City Policies 17 I LE -11. Turnbacks of County and State Roads 2 Problem: As road funding becomes increasingly inadequate, more roads are being 3 "turned back" to cities from counties and the state. 4 Solution: Turnbacks should not occur without direct funding or transfer of a 5 funding source. A process of negotiation and mediation should govern the timing, 6 funding, and condition of turned -back roads. City taxpayers should receive the same 7 treatment as township taxpayers. The requirement for a public hearing, standards 8 about the conditions of turnbacks, and temporary maintenance funding should also 9 apply to county turnbacks to cities. At a minimum, proposed roads to be turned 10 back to a lower government level should be brought up to the standards of the 11 receiving government or should be compensated with a direct payment. Direct 12 funding should be provided for smaller cities that are not provided with turnback 13 financing through the municipal state aid system. 14 LE -12. Cooperation Between Counties and Cities Over County Roads 15 Within Cities 16 Problem: Some counties want increased control over county roads that lie within city 17 boundaries. 18 Solution: A formal system of mediation should be implemented to help resolve 19 technical and aesthetic decisions about county and county state -aid roads within 20 cities. A negotiated system of review will offer both governments the opportunity to 21 produce better road projects. Local city and county officials should use available 18 League of Minnesota Cities 1 opportunities for alternate dispute resolution of the issues. Universal arbitration by 2 unaffected parties should not supersede local authority. 3 LE -13. Nuclear Waste Management 4 Problem: Congress enacted the Nuclear Waste Policy Act in 1982 to codify the 5 responsibility of the Department of Energy to provide for the safe and timely acceptance 6 of commercially- generated spent nuclear fuel by 1998 in exchange for payments by 7 electric utility ratepayers into the Federal Nuclear Waste Fund. Since 1983, $10 billion 8 has been committed into the fund, and the federal government is still not prepared to live 9 up to Congress' directive to accept spent nuclear fuel. 10 The Department of Energy believes the earliest date for a permanent repository is the year 11 2010. It is imperative that the federal government fulfill its obligation to begin accepting 12 spent nuclear fuel. 13 Solutions: 14 • Construct and operate a safe national interim spent fuel storage facility 15 capable of allowing the DOE to begin accepting spent fuel in 1998. 16 • Develop multi - purpose canisters for transportation, storage, and disposal of 17 spent nuclear fuel. 18 • Construct and operate a safe, permanent disposal facility. 19 • Create a budget mechanism to allow the Nuclear Waste Fund to be used for 20 the purpose for which the funds were contractually paid for by users of 21 nuclear- generated electricity. 1996 City Policies 19 Improving Service Delivery 1 SD -1. Redesigning and Reinventing Government 2 Problem: Every level of government is reevaluating, reprioritizing, redesigning, and 3 renewing its organizational structure and programs in response to financial realities and 4 citizens' needs and problems. Reforms, however, must be more than simply change for 5 the sake of change or a reshuffling of existing programs to appease the electorate. To be 6 meaningful, reorganization and reassignments of governmental entities and services should 7 save money where feasible, deliver improved services, serve essential needs and be 8 equitably structured. Cities have and will continue to pursue the use of cooperative 9 agreements, the reevaluation of city programs and services, and changes to organizational 10 structures. 11 Solutions: 12 The federal, state, and county governments should: 13 • promote local efforts through incentives rather than mandates; 14 • communicate and establish a process of negotiation before shifting 15 responsibility for delivering services from one level of government to another 16 or seeking to reduce service duplication; 17 • transfer authority for use of revenues dedicated to such programs or provide 18 appropriate and adequate alternatives; 19 • identify and repeal programs or discontinue services which are no longer 20 necessary or which can readily and fairly be provided by the private sector; 21 and 20 League of Minnesota Cities 1 • employ existing government entities in redesign efforts rather than create new 2 agencies or units. 3 The League supports cooperative studies of the following issues: 4 1) whether the enforcement of human rights laws can best be accomplished by 5 a single state system which would allow local governments to discontinue local 6 enforcement programs; 7 2) whether there should be greater use of statewide or consolidated business 8 licensing, including licensing of sign contractors, to eliminate the need for some 9 businesses to obtain a permit in each city or county; 10 3) whether the existing use and structure of Regional Development 11 Commissions can be improved; 12 4) whether greater use can be made of block grants to distribute funds related 13 to transportation, sewage treatment, and public water facilities; 14 5) whether human services and health programs can be improved by further 15 consolidating their administration at the state and county levels of government; and 16 6) whether state and federal environmental and water agencies can be 17 combined or eliminated to avoid inconsistent standards and duplication of 18 responsibilities. 19 SD -2. Unfunded Mandates 20 Problem: The cost of federal and state mandated programs substitute the judgment of 21 Congress and the President and the Legislature and the Governor for local budget 1996 City Policies 21 1 priorities. These mandates force cities to reduce funding for other basic services or to 2 increase taxes and service charges. The passage by Congress of legislation restraining new 3 federal mandates should help address the problem, but other steps are still necessary. 4 Solutions: 5 • Existing unfunded mandates should be reviewed and modified or repealed 6 where possible. 7 • No additional statewide mandates should be enacted unless full funding for the 8 mandate is provided by the level of government imposing it or a permanent 9 stable revenue source is established. 10 • Cities should not be forced to comply with unfunded mandates. 11 • Cities should be given the greatest flexibility possible in implementing 12 mandates to ensure that their cost is minimized. 13 SD -3. Civil Liability of Local Governments 14 Problem: One of the barriers to the delivery of governmental services and programs is 15 the exposure of local governments and their officials to civil damage claims. The state 16 has acted to protect itself and its local governments by enacting exceptions and limitations 17 to liability suits and authorizing self - insurance and other mechanisms to deal with claims 18 allowed by law. 19 Solutions: The League supports: 20 • retaining dollar limitations on governmental liability and periodically 21 reviewing and adjusting them in order to ensure market adequacy (the League 22 supports increasing the tort liability limits for both the state and its political 22 League of Minnesota Cities I subdivisions to $250,000 for any single claimant and $750,000 for all claimants 2 in a single occurrence effective January 1, 1997, and increasing the occurrence 3 limitation to $1,000,000 effective January 1, 2000; 4 • eliminating joint and several liability, or severely restricting its application to 5 situations where private or public tortfeasors are substantially at fault for the 6 damages incurred; 7 • extending the protection of the state and municipal tort claims act to quasi - 8 governmental entities when performing public services such as firefighting; 9 and 10 • existing constitutional safeguards for protecting public and private property 11 interests without any statutory expansion of property rights. 12 SD -4. Environmental Protection 13 Problem: State and federal environmental programs are improperly designed to meet 14 their stated goals, and impose an undue burden on local governments because of a lack of 15 federal or state financial assistance. The refusal to finance these programs by the 16 governments which pass them has eliminated an essential restraining feature in program 17 design and implementation. 18 Specific problems include: 19 • New programs or standards are continually adopted without regard to the 10 existence, attainability, or cost of existing programs and standards. 1996 City Policies 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ME • Fragmented program adoption and implementation does not ensure prioritization of environmental matters or the establishment of comprehensive environmental protection strategies. • "One size fits all" implementation programs force remedial efforts by local governments for nonexistent environmental problems. • Permit fees and other cost transfer elements of federal and state programs do not provide an incentive for environmental agency efficiency, policy prioritization, or risk assessment. Solutions: • A comprehensive effort to consolidate, reorganize, and manage state and federal environmental agencies and programs should be undertaken and a partial or full moratorium on new programs or requirements should be considered. • The state's Wetland Conservation Act should be revised immediately to eliminate burdensome requirements, streamline and simplify the permitting process, and to ensure local administration of the program. • Permit fees should be limited to fifty percent of the agency's direct operating costs in order to promote efficient agency operation and sufficient legislative oversight. • Sufficient state and federal financial assistance should be provided to comply with state and federal infrastructure requirements, particularly with regard to sewer and water facilities. League of Minnesota Cities I SD -5. Personnel 2 Problem: A wide variety of state and federal laws have increased the cost of providing 3 city service to residents by requiring city governments to provide certain levels of 4 compensation, benefits, or working conditions and limiting city governments' ability to 5 effectively manage their personnel resources. 6 Solutions: The federal and state governments should stop passing laws which regulate 7 the private and public sector workplace. Proposals to impose salary limits or to 8 increase public pension benefits for military service are examples of two recent state 9 proposals affecting city personnel systems which should not be passed by the state 10 Legislature. Congressional proposals to adopt a national discipline procedure to 11 insulate police officers from local and state disciplinary action similarly should be 12 dropped. 13 State and federal policymakers should enact reforms which reduce city governments' 14 personnel costs and /or increase their ability to deliver services efficiently. 15 Specifically: 16 • The state should eliminate or modify state mandates such as veterans' 17 preference and civil service which restrict the ability of local governments to 18 effectively discipline public employees. With regard to the state veteran's 19 preference law, the legislature should amend the law to : 20 0 remove the right to multiple, duplicative disciplinary 21 proceedings; 1996 City Policies 25 1 limit any back -pay claims to a maximum of $100,000, and; 2 limit the period in which to request a hearing to 14 days (from 3 the current 60 days). 4 • The state should revise public employee pension laws to facilitate consolidation 5 of local pension plans and the transition to more attractive and fiscally -sound 6 pension programs such as defined contribution plans. 7 • The state should amend the pay equity act to authorize local governments with 8 separate or joint powers hospitals, utilities, or similar services to establish and 9 maintain separate compensation systems. 10 • The state should change public sector bargaining laws to restrain arbitration 11 awards which exceed other internal class comparisons or outside cost of living 12 limitations. 13 • Congress should amend the outdated Fair Labor Standards Act to eliminate its 14 applicability to the public sector or at least recognize unique circumstances in 15 the public sector such as accounting for all hours worked by salaried 16 employees and allowing regular employees to serve as volunteers, paid on -call 17 firefighters, referees, coaches, and other community service - oriented positions. 18 SD -6. Absentee Voting 19 Problem: Absentee voting procedures are too complicated and confusing for many voters, 20 causing rejection of many ballots due to voter error. In addition, restrictive voter 21 eligibility and administrative requirements make it difficult to conduct the process in an 22 efficient and responsive manner. 26 League of Minnesota Cities 1 Solution: Absentee voting procedures should be simplified and made more "user 2 friendly" for both voters and local election officials. Reforms approved by the state 3 Senate during the 1995 session are significant and should be enacted early in 1996 to 4 encourage voter participation in the election process and improve the administration 5 of absentee voting. 6 SD -7. Statewide Voter Registration System: Access and Voter 7 Registration Cards 8 Problem: Lack of direct electronic access to the statewide voter registration system and 9 lack of uniformity in voter registration forms now in use makes it difficult and time 10 consuming for cities to keep local voter registration up -to -date and reduce the number of 11 voter registration cards on file. 12 Solution: Cities will work cooperatively with the secretary of state and the 13 Legislature to make improvements in the statewide voter registration system to: 14 • increase the number of cities with direct access to the statewide voter 15 registration system to enter, obtain, and update voter information; and 16 • make the format, size, and paper weight of voter registration cards and forms 17 uniform and provide a consistent order and content of basic voter information, 18 including precinct, ward, and school district information in the upper right- 19 hand corner of the card and listing of the voter's last name first. 1996 City Policies 27 I SD -8. Write -in Candidates 2 Problem: Requirements for recording and reporting votes for fictional and celebrity 3 write -in candidates are time consuming and do not contribute to voter confidence in the 4 outcome or the integrity of the election process. These requirements serve only to allow 5 some voters to disrespect the balloting process rather than to uphold the value of the right 6 to vote - -to make it possible for citizens to elect actual candidates to represent them in 7 public office. 8 Solution: Eliminate requirements for election judges in the precinct to tabulate or 9 report votes cast for fictional or celebrity write -in candidates. Election judges would 10 be required to list the name of each write -in candidate if votes cast in that precinct 11 for that candidate total more than five percent of votes cast in the precinct for that 12 office. 13 SD -9. Election Judge Appointments 14 Problem: Political party balance requirements for election judge appointments, 15 restrictions on how election judge compensation is paid, and the current ban on assigning 16 parents, children, or spouses to serve as election judges in the same polling place are 17 inflexible and increase the difficulty of recruiting and retaining sufficient numbers of 18 election judges to serve at the polls. 19 Solution: The 1996 session should adopt legislation already approved by the state 20 Senate which allows cities to appoint election judges not affiliated with any political 21 party and to authorize election administrators to reach agreement with community 28 League of Minnesota Cities 1 organizations to recruit election judge volunteers and to remit payment for their 2 services to the organization. The Legislature should also lift restrictions that bar 3 persons from the same family from serving as election judges in the same precinct 4 polling place. 5 SD -10. Local Election Authority 6 Problem: Adoption of uniform election requirements and the introduction of legislation 7 that would intrude on the manner in which home rule charters are amended raise concerns 8 about the importance of upholding the value of and retaining current home rule and 9 statutory city authority to schedule and conduct city elections that meet the needs of local 10 voters. 11 Solution: The Legislature should uphold local home rule authority to choose annual 12 or biennial city election year schedules as well as local authority to conduct city 13 elections as long as the local election process complies with requirements for 14 protecting voters rights, access to the ballot, voter privacy, and other provisions of 15 state election law which assure the integrity of the election process. 16 SD -11. Restricting Campaign Signs Near Polling Places 17 Problem: Voters object to campaign signs and other campaign materials found in close 18 proximity to polling places on election day. Continued objections along with allegations 19 that unfair campaign practices are being permitted raise serious concern that these ZO . occurrences undermine public confidence in the election process. 1996 City Policies 29 Solution: The Legislature should prohibit all campaign signs and other campaign 2 material from being displayed within 100 feet of polling places regardless of when 3 they are installed or put in place. 30 League of Minnesota Cities COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160091 11/06/95 $20.00 911 DISPATCH SERVICES DUES AND SUBSCRIPTION 101895 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI <*> $20.00* 160092 11/06/95 75.00* AAMOTH, BRUCE CREDIT FOR SIDEWALK 103095 PARKING LOTS PROF SERVICES $ 160093 11/06/95 $168.00 ABDELLA, PAUL AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $168.00* 160094 11/06/95 ACTION MAILING SERVICE MAILING SERVICE 92016 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 855.08+ 160095 11/06/95 $1,005.31 ADAMS GROUP INC, THE PROF SERVICES 100595 CITY HALL /BLDG PROF SERVICES <*> $1,005.31* 160096 11/06/95 $244.75 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS NOV ADT 20259609 ED BUILDING & ALARM SERVICE 11/06/95 $110.28 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE 20259607 ED BUILDING & ALARM SERVICE <*> $355.03* 160097 11/06/95 $7,817.39 AEC ENO /DESIGNERS PROF ENG SERVICES 12891 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES <*> $7,817.39* 160098 11/06/95 - $228.70 ALBINSON CREDIT ON STATEMENT OA2894 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $235.49 ALBINSON METRIC MEASUR TAPES 451374 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4319 <*> $6.79* 160099 11/06/95 $69.23 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE IN EQUIPMENT RENTAL 23654129.'ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL <*> $69.23* 160100 11/06/95 8178.90* ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING 'COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 81795 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 160101 11/06/95 $1,184.77 ALPHAGRAPHICS CALENDAR PRINTING 31328 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES <*> $1,184.77* 160102 11/06/95 $1,180.00 ALPINE ASPHALT NEW DRIVEWAY 101995 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES <*> $1,180.00* 160103 11/06/95 $927.00 ALSTAD, MARIAN AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $927.00* 160104 11/06/95 $35.46 AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLI TOOLS 00013027 TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 4078 11/06/95 $64.88 AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLI TOOLS 00013355 TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 4078 <*> $100.34* 160105 11/06/95 $2,396.25 AMERIDATA PORTABLES 704657 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 4328 11/06/95 $2,396.25 AMERIDATA PORTABLES 704657 ADMINISTRATION EQUIP REPLACEM 4328 <*> $4,792.50* 160106 11/06/95 $22.70 AMUNDSON, ERIC CONFERENCES 4 SCHOOLS 103195 POLICE DEPT. C CONE & SCHOOLS <*> $22.70* 160107 11/06/95 $101.50 ANDERSON, TOM MILEAGE 102095 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $101.50* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM Page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ----- --- --- INVOICE ---------------------------------------- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------- 16010H 11/06/95 $240.00 --- --- ----- ARM --- ----- MN /DOT C17RT /(' SMITH 10179r, ENrITNEFRING r7F ('OIJr ti !- ,rHt)oLS < *> $240.00* 160109 11/06/95 $36.28 ARROW APPLIANCE & PARTS MOCROWAVE PARTS 007452 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3867 < *> $36.28* 160110 11/06/95 $255.37 ASAP MAILING SERVICES BULK MAIL 51017 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 9014 < *> $255.37* 160111 11/06/95 $491.75 ASP COMPUTER PRODUCTS IN SJ BOARD 24965 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 4391 < *> $491.75* 160112 11/06/95 $51.56 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. BURNER 17561 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3961 11/06/95 $134.57 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. BEARING 19211 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4054 11/06/95 $276.21 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. MOTOR 17601 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3961 11/06/95 $777.37 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. POWER PACK 16711 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3944 < *> $1,239.71* 160113 11/06/95 $287.55 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP MUD FLAPS T29472 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4270 11/06/95 $71.30 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP RADIO T29503 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 4280 < *> $358.85* 160114 11/06/95 $39.94 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICE BATTERY 85554 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 4092 11/06/95 $75.09 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICE PHONE RENTAL 02357780 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 11/06/95 $103.43 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICE PHONE RENTAL 02497758 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $218.46* 160115 11/06/95 $226.85 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES AT &T WIRELESS 100995 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $50.46 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PARK PHONES 100995/P BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 4116 11/06/95 $206.04 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE CHARGE 101395/E ENGINEERING•GE GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $11.21 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE 101395 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $179.32 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES AIR TIME 101395/P GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $72.71 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR - INVEST 101995/P INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $49.81 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CAR PHONE 101995/K ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $11.86 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR - PATROL 1019 /PD PATROL TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $578.57 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR - PATROL 1019 /PD PATROL TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $69.75 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR -ACO 1019 /PD ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $62.59 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONE 101995 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4467 11/06/95 $73.28 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CAR PHONE 102795/R COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE < *> $1,592.45* 160116 11/06/95 $7.67 AT &T TELEPHONE 092795 CENT SVC GENER. TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $6.52 AT &T TELEPHONE 092795 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $34.69 AT &T TELEPHONE 101295 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $48.88* 160117 11/06/95 $22.37 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 32720 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8139 11/06/95 $22.62 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 141 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8139 < *> $44.99* 160118 11/06/95 $247.50 A1IPDFRIIEIT)E, ISAIIEL CONT REPAIRS 102695 SFWFR TREATMF.N CONT'R REPAIRS < *> $247.50* 160119 11/06/95 $33.00 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CENTE ALIGNMENT 59 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 4464 < *> $33.00* COUNCIL'CH. REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------- PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160120 11/06/95 45.11 145.11* AXT, LYLE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 103195 GUN RANGE CST OF GD FOOD 160121 11/06/95 $143.95 B & B SEAT COVERS REPLACE DAMAGED UPHOL 52722 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4303 <*1 $143.95* 1` 0122 11/06/95 B.E. MEYERS & COMPANY IN EQUIPMENT MAINT 15895 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 4187 265.00* 160123 11106/95 $35.53 BAGLEY, DOUG 6 LUNCHES /ACLS CLASS 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 11/06/95 $3.00 BAGLEY, DOUG PARKING /ACLS CLASS 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN MILEAGE *� $38.53* 160124 11/06/95 32.00 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH POSTAGE 102395 ED ADMINISTRAT POSTAGE 11/06/95 15.94 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES 102395 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 11/06/95 16.18 121.27 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 102395 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS 11/06/95 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 102395 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI *� $85.39* 160125 11/06/95 $990.45 BARNARD ELECTRONICS SERV ALARM SERVICE 0014395 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 4311 <*> $990.45* 0126 1` 11/06/95 $ 458.25 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY BRAEMAR GOLF PATH 23270221 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES * 160127 11/06/95 57.50 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES -LITE BOX D19218 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 2958 11/06/95 186.26* BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES 021480 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4214 < *' 160128 11/06/95 • BEACH'S SPORTS & AWARDS HOLE IN ONE PLAGUE 101795 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 4380 68.14 * 160129 11/06/95 $29.00 BEARMON, DIANA CLASS REFUND 100295 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F <*> $29.00* 160130 11/06/95 $85.00 BELL, BRUCE MENIER SERVICES CL /EB 111695 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 160132 11/06/95 - $21.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 221794 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 - $24.45 BELLBOY CORPORATION CHAMP. GLASSES 222192 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 -$9.78 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 222193 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $41.68 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222613 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $136.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 83051 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 - $41.68 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 222612 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 - $140.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83050 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $165.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 83048 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $27.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222623 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $$81.59 - 16.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222697 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 72.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222601 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 - 39.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222480 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 - 187.70 10.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222688 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06195 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222882 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222886 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *� 448.01* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160133 11/06/95 $1,908.00 BEN HOGAN COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 729790 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9706 < *> $1,908.00* 160134 11/06/95 $141.98 BENDING BRANCHES GENERAL SUPPLIES 17003325 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 4220 < *> $141.98* 160135 11/06/95 $120.90 BENN, BRADLEY ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 11/06/95 $231.00 BENN, BRADLEY AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $57.21 BENN, BRADLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 103195 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $409.11* 160136 11/06/95 $302.40 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 093095/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 $315.80 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 093095/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 $167.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 093095/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 -$2.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING BREAKAGE 093095/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 $170.10 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 101395/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 $260.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 101395/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 $277.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 101395/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $1,490.60* 160137 11/06/95 $195.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY NORMANDALE CLUBHOUSE 101695 NORMAN. MAINT. CONTR REPAIRS 11/06/95 $295.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE 101695 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 11/06/95 $45.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY BRAEMAR GRILL 101695 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 11/06/95 $450.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 101695 MAINT OF COURS CONTR REPAIRS < *> $985.00* 160138 11/06/95 $880.25 BERNHJELM, WILLIAM CONTINUING ED 103095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF k SCHOOLS < *> $880.25* 160140 11/06/95 $12.95 BERTELSON BROS. INC. ORGANIZER /PLANNER 2880031 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3643 11/06/95 $158.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2934200 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 4005 11/06/95 - $20.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES CM291088 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 11/06/95 $140.58 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 2958490 SPEC PROJ DONA GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $11.82 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2956021 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $10.51 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2970830 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4089 11/06/95 $52.98 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES I102883 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 4027 11/06/95 $187.44 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 2969510 SPEC PROJ DONA GENERAL SUPPLI 4318 11/06/95 $127.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2980670 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4334 11/06/95 $2.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2980670 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4334 11/06/95 $21.30 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PAPER CUTTER BLADE R072710 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3868 11/06/95 $40.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2985670 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 4312 11/06/95 $75.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT CARD TAPE I102909 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 4472 11/06/95 $54.44 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2985671 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 4312 11/06/95 $2.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3005910 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4471 11/06/95 $289.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3005910 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4471 11/06/95 $80.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3004510 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 11/06/95 $113.48 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3017910 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 4236 11/06/95 $12.78 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SURGE STRIP 3005911 GENERAW BILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $95.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3026610 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 4237 < *> $1,469.52* 160141 11/06/95 $212.99 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. VCR 00501267 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 3877 < *> $212.99* 160142 11/06/95 $13.05 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF KEYS 024751 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL,CH REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $13.05* 0143 1` 11/06/95 X 102.94* BEST WESTERN HOTEL HOTEL T. JOHNSON 102495 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 160144 11/06/95 $2,,170.74 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 70082 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $4,809.62 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 70083 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $1,167.12 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 70125 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $2,681.36 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 70124 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP < *> $10,828.84* 160145 11/06/95 $105.00 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE LOCK /SAFE REPAIR 093760 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 4615 < *> $105.00* 160146 11/06/95 $375.08 BOAST PRO SHOP MDSE 126204 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3590 < *> $375.08* 160147 11/06/95 $497.35 BOBBY GRACE GOLF DESIGN PRO SHOP MDSE 108778 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4587 < *> $497.35* 160148 11/06/95 497.21 BOOKMEN INC, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 415750 ART SUPPLY GIP CST OF GD FOOD 4335 11/06/95 0 149987.43* BMEN INC, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 415751 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4354 < *> 160149 11/06/95 $28.00 BOSS, DIANE CLASS REFUND 091695 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $28.00* 160150 11/06/95 $69.78 BOYER TRUCKS TUBE /ASSY /VALVE 436868 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4083 < *> $69.78* 160151 11/06/95 $21.25 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE MLC MEETING 101895 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS $ * 160152 11/06/95 $8.50 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 102295 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 11/06/95 $13.60 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OVER /UNDER 102295 GOLF FROG CASH OVER AND 11/06/95 $52.26 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SUPPLIES 102295 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $36.99 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 102295 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 11/06/95 $15.90 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE POSTAGE 102295 GOLF ADMINISTR POSTAGE < *> $127.25* 160153 11/06/95 $137.70 BRAEMAR PRINTING ADVERTISING 45756 PRO SHOP ADVERT OTHER 4381 < *> $137.70* 160154 11/06/95 $114.75 BRAUN INTERTEC TESTING SERVICES 067369 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $114.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CONCRETE TESTING MALO 067368 ST IMPROVEMENT CIP 11/06/95 $38.25 BRAUN INTERTEC TESTING RAMPS 067366 PARKING /PARKIN CIP 11/06/95 $408.00 BRAUN INTERTEC TESTING SERVICE 067180 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $675.75* 160155 11/06/95 $295.42 BRC - ELECTIONS ELECTION SUPPLIES 4129290 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4226 < *> $295.42* 160156 11/06/95 $246.89 BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 390543 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL < *> $246.89* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - -- - -- -- INVOICE - -- PROGRAM-------- --- - - - - -- - OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - -- ----- ----- 160157 --- ----------------- 11/06/95 - - - - $31.20 - -- -- --- --- -- -- - - - - -- BROCKWAY, MAUREEN - ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $31.20* 160158 11/06/95 $362.00 BROWDER STONE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD 955668 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3889 < *> $362.00* 160159 11/06/95 $202.35 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS LOOPER FINDER MODULE 18638 ST LIGHTING OR CONTR REPAIRS 1885 < *> $202.35* 160160 11/06/95 $160.00 BRUMFIELD, ADRIANE ART WORK SOLD 103195 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $160.00* 160161 11/06/95 $25,620.00 BRW INC. CONSULTING SERVICES 07739 STREET IMPROVE CIP 11/06/95 $2,868.70 BRW INC. CONSULTING SERVICES 08518 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $28,488.70* 160162 11/06/95 $525.79 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC FIELD AG LIME 101595 FIELD MAINTENA INFIELD MIX 4252 < *> $525.79* 160163 11/06/95 $33.15 BUELL, KIM ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $33.15* 1.60164 11/06/95 $55.00 BUIE, BARBARA REFUND UNUSED PATRON 102395 GOLF PROG MEMBERSHIPS 11/06/95 $146.07 BUIE, BARBARA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 103095 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < *> $201.07* 160165 11/06/95 $20.14 BUIE, ROBERT CONT ED /DRUG INTERDIC 102395 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $20.14* ' 160166 11/06/95 $23.18 BURKE, PAUV CONT ED /DRUG INTERDIC 102395 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $23.18* 160167 11/06/95 $74.00 BUSCH, MARGE CLASS REFUND 101895 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $74.00* 160168 11/06/95 $107.40 CALLAHAN, FRAN OCTOBER MILEAGE 101395 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $107.40* 160169 11/06/95 $101.88 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S GOODS - PRO S 561020 586292 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9032 9032 11/06/95 11/06/95 $87.18 $1,674.74 CALLAWAY GOLF CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF PRO SHOP MDSE 588189 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9032 < *> $1,863.80* 160170 11/06/95 $75.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 103195 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $75.00* 160171 11/06/95 $250.82 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS PAGER REPAIR 10449 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3398 < *> $250.82* 160172 11/06/95 $15.55 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPAN HOCKEY RINK CONSTRUCT 331423 331190 BUILDING MAINT BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLI 4422 4106 11/06/95 $41.54 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPAN AUGER RENTAL < *> $57.09* 160173 11/06/95 $107.59 CARLSON PRINTING LETTERHEAD 62846 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4637 < *> $107.59* COUNCIL'CH. 1 REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160174 11/06/95 $45.50 CASE, JENNY CLASS REFUND 101895 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F <*> $45.50* 160'75 11/06/95 $27 * .18 CATCO COUPLER 390571 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4437 160176 11/06/95 $118.90* CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS TONER 2220785 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 160177 11/06/95 $3.25 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL SALES TAX 569505. CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $3.25* 160178 11/06/95 $63.56 CENTRAL GARDEN & PET GENERAL SUPPLIES 092895 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $158.02 CENTRAL GARDEN & PET TREE WRAP 53279510 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4325 < *> $221.58* 160179 11/06/95 $171.59 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 21834 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3150 < *> $171.59• 160180 11/06/95 $150.48 CERTIFIED POWER TRAIN CLUTCH COVER /DISC 155556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4079 < *> $150.48* 160181 11/06/95 $84.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON GRAPHIC CHGS 1995 FAL 2710 ADAPTIVE RECRE PRINTING < *> $84.00* 160182 11/06/95 $49.21 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $46.22 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 VERNON OCCUPAN SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $600.43 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $967.23 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 CITY HALL GENE 'BUILDING SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $49.80 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 MAINT SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $43.84 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 100695 50TH ST OCCUPA SEWER & WATER 11/06/95 $45.32 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 1006 GENERAL MAINT SEWER & WATER < *> $1,802.05* 160183 11/06/95 $415.95 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 093095 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $415.95* 160184 11/06/95 $500.00 CITY OF SHOREVIEW DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100695 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $500.00* 160185 11/06/95 $196.00 CLASSIC PRO PRO SHOP MDSE 3681 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8407 < *> $196.00* 160186 11/06/95 $163.40 CLEARSNAP COST OF GOODS SOLD 11101 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF CD FOOD 9522 < *> $163.40* 160187 11/06/95 $400.90 COBRA GOLF INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 291121 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9029 < *> $400.90* 160188 11/06/95 $101.35 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05270185 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $196.15 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05333041 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $85.40 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05372684 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $175.55 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05383459 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $558.45* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160189 11/06/95 $375.00 COMMUNITY INTERVENTION SEMINAR CHEMICAL HEAL 102795 SPEC PROD DONA CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $375.00* 160190 11/06/95 $75.59 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE MODEM 710485 PUBLIC HEALTH EQUIP REPLACEM 4211 11/06/95 $215.00 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE PORTABLE SUPPLIES 713242 ADMINISTRATION EQUIP REPLACEM 4639 11/06/95 $136.46 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE PORTABLE SUP 713242 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 4639 < *> $427.05* 160191 11/06/95 $17.00 CONNECT INC ICHIEFS COMPUTER 24608050 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 7421 < *> $17.00* 160192 11/06/95 $71.55 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 70166200 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 4091 11/06/95 $195.57 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS EAR PLUG /RESPIRATORS 71613800 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4281 < *> $267.12* 160193 11/06/95 $60.19 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. BLUELINE PAPER 0427066 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 4221 < *> $60.19* 160194 11/06/95 $904.00 CRAMER BUILDING, SERVICES MCQUAY REPAIR 74297 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 3909 < *> $904.00* 160195 11/06/95 639.00 CRITTER CONTROL RMV 3 BEAVER /MINNEHAH 26238 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES P4309 11/06/95 213.00 1852.00* CRITTER CONTROL CONTRACTED BEAVER REM 26243 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 4308 < *> 160196 11/06/95 $63.80 CRONSTROMS HEATING & AIR JOB CANCEL /6409 WILLO 102095 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERMI < *> $63.80* 160197 11/06/95 $240.00 CROW - HASSAN NURSERY SWAMP WHITE OAK TREE/ 1771 WORK. CAP. PRO ACCTS REC MISC 4001 < *> $240.00* ' 160198 11/06/95 $77.13 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 76028 MAINT OF COORS REPAIR PARTS 3805 11/06/95 $230.46 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 76312 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4165 < *> $307.59* 160199 11/06/95 $3.25 CUSTOM TRUCK ACCESSORIES SALES TAX 89402. EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $3.25* 160200 11/06/95 $559.00 CYLINDER CITY HYD CYL REP 75964 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 4046 < *> $559.00* 160201 11/06/95 $30.71 D.C. HEY CO. CLEANING SUPPLIES 78105A ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL 4013 11/06/95 $32.00 D.C. HEY CO. COPY MACHINE 566901 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $62.71* 160202 11/06/95 $48.99 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN HYDRAULIC FLUID 187653 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4240 < *> $48.99* 160203 11/06/95 $39.85 DAY - TIMERS INC. CALENDAR 20655694 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 4243 11/06/95 $105.80 DAY - TIMERS INC. OFFICE. SUPPLIES 20311692 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE. SUPPLIE 4392 < *> $145.65* 160204 11/06/95 $452.58 DAYSTARTER BATTERIES 12144 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4118 11/06/95 $95.76 DAYSTARTER CART BATTERIES 12381 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 4526 < *> $548.34* COUNCIL-CH. REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160; 05 11/06/95 DELTA DENTAL DENTAL PREMIUM 11/95 78143 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 3 ,799.70 * 160206 11/06/95 $821.58 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY BAKERY 093095 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8154 < *> $821.58* 16 07 11/06/95 22 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RE FIREARM SAFETY COURSE 103195 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 0 0.00* 16 08 11/06/95 2 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF LICENSES & PERMITS 101595 VERNON LIQUOR LIC & PERMITS 0 0.00* 160209 11/06/95 $20.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF LICENSES & PERMITS 101595 LIQUOR 50TH ST LIC & PERMITS < *> $20.00* 160210 11/06/95 $20.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF LICENSES & PERMITS 101595 LIQUOR YORK GE LIC & PERMITS < *> $20.00* 160211 11/06/95 $10.00 DEPT OF LABOR /INDUSTRY LICENSE FEE 192750 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4102 < *> $10.00* 160212 11/06/95 $80.00 DEPT OF LABOR /INDUSTRY LICENSE FEE 192749 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $80.00* 160213 11/06/95 $10.00 DEPT OF LABOR /INDUSTRY LICENSE FEE 192751 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4101 < *> $10.00* 160214 11/06/95 - $55.08 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 212047CM PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8405 11/06/95 $127.19 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 420726 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8405 11/06/95 $66.80 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 421378 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS =PR 8405 11/06/95 $62.48 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 422372 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8405 < *> $201.39* 160215 11/06/95 $89.82 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 139605 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3885 11/06/95 $58.14 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 140436 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4006 11/06/95 $145.57 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 140609 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4341 < *> $293.53* 160216 11/06/95 $912.00 DICKER, TOBIE AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $912.00* 160217 11/06/95 $6.79 DIESEL INJECTION SPEC PLUNGER /SEAL /O -RING 081795 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3225 < *> $6.79* 160218 11/06/95 $256.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $256.00* 160219 11/06/95 $92.59 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY C COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3636 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8410 < *> $92.59* 160220 11/06/95 $4.21 DON'S APPLIANCE & TELEVI DRYER REPAIRS 47061 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 4234 11/06/95 $51.97 DON'S APPLIANCE & TELEVI CONTRACTED REPAIRS 47061 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 4234 < *> $56.18* 160221 11/06/95 $4.03 DONAGHUE DOORS SALES TAX 10215. 50TH ST OCCUPA EQUIP MAINT 0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM - --------------------------------------------------------- <*> $4.03* 160222 11/06/95 $5,471.40 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 458029 LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA < *> $5,471.40* 160223 11/06/95 $24.72 DRAPER, TOM CONT ED /DRUG INTERDIC 102395 . POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $24.72* 160224 11/06/95 $176.00 DUSCHANE, DAVID F. WOOD CLUB 102195 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4379 < *> $176.00* 160225 11/06/95 $4,050.00 DYNEX INDUSTRIES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51779 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 3086 < *> $4,050.00* 160226 11/06/95 $6,134.40 E -Z -GO TEXTRON GOLF CARTS /LEASED 29451 GOLF CARS LEASE LINES 2007 11/06/95 $87.75 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART PARTS 0036646 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3990 < *> $6,222.15* 160227 11/06/95 $43.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER /NORMANDALE GOLF 091895 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 8141 11/06/95 $2,967.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 580519 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $79.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 580520 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $472.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 583346 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $2,721.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 583347 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $933.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 583345 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,877.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 586230 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $130.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 586231 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $663.05 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 586233 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $35.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 589022 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $848.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 589022 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,573.65 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 589023 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,956.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 589021 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,493.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 586232 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $15,796.50* 160228 11/06/95 $16.23 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCT FREIGHT 54813 RANGE RANGE BALLS 4597 < *> $16.23* 160229 11/06/95 $41.54 ECOWATER SYSTEMS WATER TREATMENT 101695 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $41.54* 160230 11/06/95 $15.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERC CHAMBER LUNCH 1950 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $15.00* 160231 11/06/95 $572.77 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN DRAINAGE MATERIAL /ROC 61949 MAINT OF COURS SAND,GRVL & RO 3911 < *> $572.77* 160232 11/06/95 $400.00 EFRA COPIER USE 1995 /FIRE 101795 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $400.00* 160233 11/06/95 $101.97 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE WINDOWS 22544000 PUBLIC HEALTH EQUIP REPLACEM 4248 11/06/95 $41.54 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE CAL CREAT 22579659 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 4248 11/06/95 $318.17 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE REFLECT 5.0 22611653 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 4327 11/06/95 $243.00 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE WP WIN 22685358 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 4387 < *> $704.68* COUNCrL•CH1 REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --- --- - - - --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1` 0234 11/06/95 EICHSTADT, KENDRA SERVICES CL /EB 102595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 140.63* 160235 11/06/95 $49.30 ELASKY, JEFF CONT ED /EMT /PD 101895 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 11/06/95 $45.23 ELASKY, JEFF CONT ED /EMT 102695 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *, $94.53* 160236 11/06/95 $133.13 ELVIN SAFETY EYEGLASS HOLDER 07521301 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4239 < *> $133.13* 1`0237 11/06/95 $2.60* EMPIRE CLOCK INC SALES TAX 67142. PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 160238 11/06/95 $3$00.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES NOV 1995 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $300.00* 160239 11/06/95 $113.50 ENGER, DON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 103095 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $113.50* 160240 11/06/95 $227.12 EQUITY TITLE SPECIAL /5101 WOODDALE 101695 SIDEWALK SP ASSES RE DE < *> $227.12* 160241 11/06/95 $2,009.83 ERICSSON RADIO REPLACEMENT 0235141 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 2588 11/06/95 $2,081.84 ERICSSON RADIO REPLACEMENT 0236841 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 2588 < *> $$$4,091.67* 160242 11/06/95 $200.00 EXPLORERS POST 925 HOURS WORKED CITY AUC 102695 GENERAL FD PRO SALE OF PROPER <*> $200.00* 160243' 11/06/95 $44.85 FAST SERV MEDICAL AMBULANCE STRETCHER S 1242 FIRE DEPT' GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3874 < *> $44.85* 160244 11/06/95 8FASTSIGN 189.46* SIGNS 4346 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4208 160245 11/06/95 $5.00 FIAM DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 103095 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $5.00* 160246 11/06/95 $75.00 FIRE /EMS CENTER SAFETY OFF TRG 100995 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $75.00* 160247 11/06/95 $400.00 FIRST TRUST COP ADMIN FEE 33315370 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES < *> $400.00* 160248 11/06/95 $78$780.00* FLAME METALS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 107167 1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 4389 160249 11/06/95 $418.02 FLANAGAN SALES SIGNS 5111 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 3485 < *> $418.02* 160250 11/06/95 $37.28 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA SEWER RODDER VALVE 3005 SEWER CLEANING GENERAL SUPPLI 4415 < *> $37.28* 160251 11/06/95 $110.50 FLINT, CAROL AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $110.50* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE --- ------ PROGRAM -------- ------- OBJECT-- - - - - - ---- -PO -NUM -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160252 11/06/95 $7.22 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY SALES TAX 264026. 268527 BUILDING MAINT 50TH ST OCCUPA PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLI 4254 11/06/95 $12.14 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY KEY BLANKS < +> $19.36* 160253 11/06/95 $173.91 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4126850 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9035 9035 11/06/95 $84.63 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS - PRO S - PRO S 4130782 6727440 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 11/06/95 11/06/95 - $67.75 $112.43 FOOT -JOY FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4157290 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 11/06/95 $40.46 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4169953 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9035 11/06/95 $85.62 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4172229 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 9035 9035 11/06/95 $41.84 FOOT -JOY PRO MERCH 4179323 < +> $471.14* 160254 11/06/95 $154.88 FORRESTER'S COST OF GOODS - PRO S 22670 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8406 < *> $154.88* 160255 11/06/95 $15.63 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 137820 10137820 MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 4167 4167 11/06/95 $45.84 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS < +> $61.47* 160256 11/06/95 $75.00 FRAGALE, ANNETTE SERVICES CL /EB 110295 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 160257 11/06/95 336.00 FRAME, SUSAN AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 103195 ART CENTER ADM ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES COST OF GDS -PR 11/06/95 362.22 1698.22* FRAME, SUSAN COST OF COMMOD < *> 160258 11/06/95 $99.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS CONT ED 3313068 3320470' POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS CONF & SCHOOLS 11/06/95 $99.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS CONT ED < +> $198.00* ' 160259 11/06/95 $117.41 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 101595 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $117.41* 160260 11/06/95 $29.21 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 092995/E ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY < +> $29.21* 160261 11/06/95 $72.00 GANDRUD, ANN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 101395 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $72.00* 160262 11/06/95 $450.50 GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE SOLD BE 193882 193883 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 11/06195 $772.50 $780.92 GANZER DIST INC GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 193884 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE BEE 11/06/95 $107.00 GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 194137 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS < +> $2,110.92* 160263 11/06/95 $320.00 CARDER, DOUG AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $320.00* 160264 11/06/95 $157.32 GARVEN GREETINGS INC GIFT BAGS 103577 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $157.32* 160265 11/06/95 $200.00 GCSAA GOLF COURSE SUPER MAI 1010895 GOLF ADMINISTR Pro Svc- Aud /Vi < *> $200.00* COUNCIL CHL_., REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT - - - - -- VENDOR- -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - -_- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE --------------- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM ----------------------------------- 160266 11/06/95 $2,596.32 --- GEAR FOR SPORTS COST OF GOODS PRO S 109019 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8412 <*> $2,596.32* 67 1`0' 11/06/95 GEREBI, LIZ SERVICES CL /EB 102595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 455.62* 160268 11/06/95 $58.54 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF PRO MERCH 10481479 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3598 11/06/95 $219.31 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF PRO MERCH 10481476 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3598 11/06/95 $439.70 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF PRO MERCH 10482480 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3598 11/06/95 $143.66 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF SUPPLIES 10484656 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3598 11/06/95 $66.69 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF SUPPLIES 10484507 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3598 < *� $927.90* 160269 11/06/95 2 GIRARD'S BUSINESS MACHIN MAILING SERVICE 060201 GENERAW BILLIN PROF SERVICES 67.30* 160270 11/06/95 $50.00 GLADCHILD, PAT PERFORMANCE AT EDINBO 102495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 160271 11/06/95 $50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE PIANO TUNING 951010 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES <*> $50.00* 160272 11/06/95 2 GLEWWE, LINDA AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 52.00* 160273 11/06/95 $42.00 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9300 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9028 11/06/95 $84.00 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9304 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9028 *� $126.00* 160274 11/06/95 565.88* 1565.88* GOLFER'S GALLERY COST OF GOODS - PRCF S 1963 -PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3592' 160275 11/06/95 $18.59 GOODALL MFG CO PULLEY /GENERATOR 06688900 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3953 <*> $18.59* 160276 11/06/95 460.25 1460.25* OPHER STATE 1 CALL GOPHER ONE SERVICE 5090233 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE 160277 11/06/95 11,500.00* GRAHAM NUNN PAINTING CONTRACT PROPOSAL 101795 PARK CIP CIP P4182 160278 11/06/95 $111.90 GRAINGER WALL FIXTURE 49528403 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3563 11/06/95 $339.31 GRAINGER LIGHT BULBS 49868488 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4131 11/06/95 $47.25 GRAINGER SAFETY SHIELD 49868637 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 4062 11/06/95 $169.43 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 49868732 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $2.20 GRAINGER BUTANE FUEL 49868735 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4086 11/06/95 311.28 GRAINGER DRILL & BITS 690417 -7 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 3976 *� 1981.37* 160279 11/06/95 323.40 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10410 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 110695 542.80 1372.25 GRAPE BEINNIS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10413 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10476 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE *� $1,238.45* 160280 11/06/95 - $14.67 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CREDIT 10433111 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5073 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR--------- -- DESCRIPTION - - - -- - - - -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM - - -- - -------- 160280 ---- ------- 11/06/95 - - - - -- ----- $1,252.44 - - - - -- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. - - - - LIGHT BULBS 10434405 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 3730 11/06/95 $60.91 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. MISC HARDWARE 10436529 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4058 < *> $1,298.68* 160281 11/06/95 $264.04 GREENLEAF INC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 103195 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD < *> $264.04* 160282 11/06/95 $2,145.19 GREUPNER, JOE 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES < *> $2,145.19* 160283 11/06/95 $193.84 GROVE NURSERY CENTER REPLACEMENT TREE 80741 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 4038 < *> $193.84* 160284 11/06/95 $163.90 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT HYDRAULIC & HOSE 2690 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3529 11/06/95 $40.42 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT PARTS 2757 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 3678 < *> $204.32* 160285 11/06/95 $10.00 GUNDLACH, CLAUDIA CLASS REFUND 101895 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $10.00* 160286 11/06/95 $116.66 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY ANTIFREEZE 72768 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 11/06/95 $48.12 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 2 CYCLE OIL 279710 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 3523 11/06/95 $190.55 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY ANTIFREEZE 279808 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 3523 < *> $355.33* 160287 11/06/95 $15.00 HALVORSON, JIM RENEWAL /C WASTE WATER 101795 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $15.00* 160288 11/06/95 $1,319.74 HANSON, MICHAEL ADDITIONAL COMPUTER E 10007 INSPECTIONS EQUIP REPLACEM . < *> $1,319.74* ' 160289 11/06/95 $45.00 HARMON GLASS GLASS INSTALLED 72002786 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3707 < *> $45.00* 160290 11/06/95 $285.00 HARTLEIB, CECEILE AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $285.00* 160291 11/06/95 $2,118.34 HAWKINS CHEMICAL WATER CHEMICALS 72286 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 1091 < *> $2,118.34* 160292 11/06/95 $312.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA ART WORK SOLD 103195 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $312.00* 160293 11/06/95 $129.41 HEATH, JODY CONT ED /EMT /POLICE 103095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $129.41* 160294 11/06/95 $64.20 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CE 103195 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $64.20* 160295 11/06/95 $134.10 HEIMARK FOODS MEATS 101295 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8142 < *> $134.10* 160296 11/06/95 $19.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC R FILING FEE 093095 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $19.50* COUNCIL Cl REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160297 11/06/95 $584.36 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE & JAIL 101795 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $584.36* 160298 11/06/95 $4,413.09 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE ROOM & BOARD PRISONER 000591 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $4,413.09* 160299 11/06/95 $140.58 HERMAN MILLER INC. FURN ASST MGR 373581 GOLF FROG CLUB HOUSE EQU 4202 < *> $140.58* 160300 11/06/95 $186.38 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG FIELD MARKING PAINT 034598 FIELD MAINTENA PAINT 1066 11/06/95 $74.55 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG FIELD PAINT 034666 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1066 < *> $260.93* 160301 11/06/95 $84.08 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT SUPPLIES 388969 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3945 < *> $84.08* 160302 11/06/95 $61.56 HOFFERS INC FIELD PAINT 35547800 FIELD MAINTENA PAINT 4255 < *> $61.56* 160303 11/06/95 $27.96 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 48238 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $37.80 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 48655 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $65.76* 160304 11/06/95 $630.22 HONEYWELL INC PUMP REPAIR 287PT793 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 4498 < *> $630.22* 160305 11/06/95 $20.00 HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT MAILING LIST EDINA RE 102395 ATHLETIC ACTIV PROF SERVICES < *> $20.00* 160306 '11/06/95 $135.46 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 'INC CHLORINE D.E. 5471 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 11/06/95 $79.88 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO INC CHLORINE D.E. 5482 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 4181 < *> $215.34* 160307 11/06/95 $58.27 HUEBSCH TOWELS,MATS 878259 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 11/06/95 $45.18 HUEBSCH TOWELS,RUGS 882076 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 11/06/95 $54.14 HUEBSCH SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 885956 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $157.59* 160308 11/06/95 $1,251.59 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 8821 UTILITY FROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 11/06/95 $11526.08 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 8822 UTILITY FROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 11106/95 x569.03 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 8832 UTILITY FROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 11/06/95 $3,430.90 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 8860 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 < *> $6,777.60* 160309 11/06/95 $125.00 IAAO IAAO SANKEY 800500 ASSESSING PROF SERVICES < *> $125.00* 160310 11/06/95 $705.00 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUES 314842 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $705.00* 160311 11/06/95 $12.22 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTEN SALES TAX 9338. STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 11/06/95 $140.69 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTEN PANEL FILTER 9390 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 4077 < *> $152.91* 160312 11/06/95 $3,252.00 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONTRACT 17848 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHEER REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < +> $3,252.00* 160313 11/06/95 $33.10 IVERSON, KATHY TOBACCO AWARENESS SUP 102795 SPEC PROD DONA GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $24.80 IVERSON, KATHY PHONE SERVICE FOR OFF 1027 SPEC PROJ DONA GENERAL SUPPLI < +> $57.90* 160314 11/06/95 $446.25 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER PR TIME & EXPENSE 12116 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $19.00 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER MISC PRODUCTION EXP 12117 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $290.00 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER BGD /TGV PROMO 12118 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES 11/0695 12119 GOLF DOME PROF $955.08 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISINGLOTHERLICI 12137 GOLF DOME ADVERTEOTHERS < *> $1,770.33* 160315 11/06/95 $984.06 J -CRAFT INC REP DUMP BOX 16786 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 3968 < +> $984.06* 160316 11/06/95 $442.56 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ELEC SUPPLIES 09295422 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 4030 11/06/95 $207.78 J.11. LARSON ELECTRICAL C MISC ELEC 10025428 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4042 11/06/95 $254.95 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ELECTRICAL 10105454 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 4094 11/06/95 $46.46 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ELECTRICAL 10115462 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 4108 11/06/95 $75.05 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C SAFETY SWITCH 10175480 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 4265 < *> $1,026.80* 160317 11/06/95 $564.82 JERRYS PRINTING BUILDING PERMITS AA3154 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 4185 < +> $564.82* 1.60318 11/06/95 $240.00 JEUB, PATTI AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < +> $240.00* 160319 11/06/95 $415.15 JIM LUPIENT'S GM WORLD 0 PARTS 676704 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4284 < *> $415.15* 160320 11/06/95 $60.90 JOHNS, RICHARDS MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT 102495 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < +> $60.90* 160321 11/06/95 $137.32 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CE 103195 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 11/06/95 $36.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 103195 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $173.72* 160322 11/06/95 $55.10 JOHNSON, STEVE LUNCHES FOR SAFETY CO 103095 SUPERV. & OVRH CONF & SCHOOLS < +> $55.10* 160323 11/06/95 $468.75 JONES, JENNIFER SERVICES CL /ES 102595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < +> $468.75* 160324 11/06/95 $38.71 JPM STORE FIXTURE & DISP SUPPLIES 273770 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 4200 < +> $38.71* 160325 11/06/95 $283.97 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 10503 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 4374 < +> $283.97* 160326 11/06/95 $14.22 JULIEN, DIANE TRIPS TO AAA & HOPKIN 101895 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $14.22* 160327 11/06/95 $196.92 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 60202 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3279 COUNCIL-CL REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160327 11/06/95 $66.41 JUSTUS LUMBER HARDWARE 64332 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3661 11/06/95 $73.05 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 66349 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3928 11/06/95 $27.56 JUSTUS LUMBER NAILS 66770 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3935 c *> $363.94* 160328 11/06/95 $59.11 KANE SERVICE, THE 10/7 SIMS 6677712 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $59.11 KANE SERVICE, THE SIMS 10/14 6692119 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $118.22* 160329 11/06/95 $28.61 KANE, KENNETH CONT ED /EMT /PD 101295 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $28.61* 160330 11/06/95 $132.93 KAR PRODUCTS FASTENERS 292397 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 4168 < *> $132.93* 160331 11/06/95 $332.06 KEMP, CHARLOTTE INPUT PATRON CARDS 101895 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES < *> $332.06* 160332 11/06/95 $252.00 KENNEDY, CARLA AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $252.00* 160333 11/06/95 $863.86 KEPRIOS, JOHN REIMB /NRPA CONGRESS E 101995 PARK CIP CIP < *> $863.86* 160334 11/06/95 $336.54 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC JUNCTION BOXES 33140 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4473 < *> $336.54* 160335 11/06/95 $13.48 KLEINBERG, ERIC CONT ED /DRUG INTERDIC 102395 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $13.48* . 160336 11/06/95 $99.53 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 174744 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 3998 11/06/95 $12.99 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 077101 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 3921 11/06/95 $50.69 KNOX COMM CREDIT MISC HARDWARE 175701 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4034 11/06/95 $591.08 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 175537 PARK CIP CIP 3814 11/06/95 $4,488.42 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 175959 PARK CIP CIP 3814 11/06/95 $105.24 KNOX COMM CREDIT RINK BOARDS 175795 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3814 11/06/95 $35.13 KNOX COMM CREDIT HAND TOOLS 175830 BUILDING MAINT CITY HALL 4039 11/06/95 $53.24 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 176168 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3992 11/06/95 $120.29 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER /NAILS 176147 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 4048 11/06/95 $115.20 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 177523 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 4172 < *> $5,671.81* 160337 11/06/95 $90.00 KOCHENASH, RICK AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 160338 11/06/95 $55.00 KOJETIN, BOB REIMBURSMENT /PURCHASE 103095 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $55.00* 160339 11/06/95 $69.00 KOMAREK, GINA SURVIAL SKILLS FOR SU 101095 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS <*> $69.00* 160340 11/06/95 $25.28 KRUGE AIR INC REPAIR PARTS on24763I MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4169 < *> $25.28* 160341 11/06/95 $1,085.20 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142448 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHEt-K REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION --- ---- INVOICE ---------- PROGRAM -- ---- - -- - -- OBJECT - - - - -PO NUM -- - - - --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160341 11/06/95 $245.00 Kl1ETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142469 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $279.00 KUETIIER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142709 YORK SELLING: CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,011.50 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142939 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $486.40 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142969 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $1,065.40 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 143446 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE <*> $4,172.50* 160342 11/06/95 $142.00 KUIPERS, PETER CLASS REFUND 100395 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F .C*> $142.00* 160343 11/06/95 $29.44 KUYPER, SCOTT CONT ED /DRUG INTERDIC 102395 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $29.44* 160344 11/06/95 $45.66 LADY FAIRWAY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 24432 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 2773 <*> $45.66* 160345 11/06/95 $220.00 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE GRADING & BASE I CERT 101895 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS <*> $220.00* 160346 11/06/95 $61.80 LANCRETE, LAURA SEPT & OCT '95 MILEAG 102795 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE <*> $61.80* 160347 11/06/95 $32.50 LASLEY, SUSAN ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $32.50* 160349 11/06/95 $518.72 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. MISC HARDWARE 1328614 1332564 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES 3674 3846 11/06/95 11/06/95 $284.53 $459.19 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE MISC HARDWARE /BRASS V 1332565 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3847 11/06/95 $54.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. TOOLS MISC HARDWARE 1336256 1337014' BUILDING MAINT DISTRIBUTION TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI 3964 3959' 11/06/95 11/06/95 $113.23' $468.55 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. BRASS FITTINGS 1337013 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 3958 11/06/95 - $518.72 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. CREDIT 1328614C EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3674 11/06/95 $319.39 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. WELDING CABLE /TRUCK P 1337240 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3194 11/06/95 $318.90 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. WELD'G CABLE /PWR IVTR 1337241 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3184 11/06/95 $489.35 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 0 RING ASST 1337239 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 3674 11/06/95 $314.02 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. MISC SUPPLIES 1341050 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4066 11/06/95 $265.62 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE 1341051 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 4067 11/06/95 $299.21 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE 1341049 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4069 11/06/95 $463.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. SHOP SUPPLIES FLUORESBNT PAINT -SURV 1341052 1344243 BUILDING MAINT ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 4068 4084 11/06/95 11/06/95 $136.64 $232.91 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE 1345057 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4115 11/06/95 -$7.99 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. PAYMENT ISSUED IN ERR 101895 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER *> $4,212.14* 160350 11/06/95 $25.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI POLICY ADOPTION MTG 103095 COMMUNICATIONS CONF & SCHOOLS e *> $25.00* 160351 11/06/95 $64.04 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION 059117 059131 CLUB HOUSE GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA RUBBISH REMOVA 8144 8144 11/06/95 $97.37 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION *> $161.41* 160352 11/06/95 $6.66 LINHOFF SLIDE PROCESSING 2969 3622 PUBLIC HEALTH PARK ADMIN. PHOTO SUPPLIES PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $7.99 LINHOFF FILM DEVELOPING FILM 3711 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 11/06/95 $15.72 521.47 LINHOFF LINHOFF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3824 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES 1569 COUNCtL•CR REGISTER WED, NOV 1; 1995, 7:43 PM page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $51.84* 160353 11/06/95 $84.08 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4516 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 4599 < *> $84.08* 160354 11/06/95 160355 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 160356 11/06/95 160357 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 160361 11/06/95 e *> 160363 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 $196.38 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES $196.38* 65.24 61.45 $59.10 $1.69 $187.48* $193.32 $193.32* $204.24 $425.50 $306.36 $391.46 $289.34 $221.26 1 204.24 272.32 $2,314.72* LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI HUB ASSY /HUB LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI SHAFT LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI REPAIR PARTS LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI SPRING LONG, JEFF M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON $30.00 M.A.U.M.A. $30.00* $136.85 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. $264.12 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1 89.58 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 31.15 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. $521.70* 1566.01 MACKUBIN GROUP, THE 566.01* 141876 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4024 208570 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3708 208789 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3708 209053 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4173 209090 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4258 CONT ED /POLICE 102095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40719 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27641 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40879 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40884 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40944 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40953 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41044 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41019 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX MAUMA DUES 110195 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI TOW BAR 2958046 BROOM FOR SWEEPER 2958047 SHIM /PINION /OIL SEAL 2958164 INDICATOR CABLE 2958255 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4043 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 4043 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3710 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4273 BAR CODE SCANNER 26102395 UTILITY PROG MACH. & EQUIP 4156 $1,200.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1122 $1,200.00* $89.30 $63.75 $1,161.35 $93.25 $0.06 $1,878.25 $532.00 $14.80 $2,347.23 $49.90 $322.01 $1.75 $657.95 MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439341 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 439339 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441438 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441439 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441789 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441788 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441787 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441760 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441758 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441759 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441757 BALANCE DUE 439342 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 443828 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 160358 11/06/95 160359 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 160360 11/06/95 < *> 160361 11/06/95 e *> 160363 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 $196.38 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES $196.38* 65.24 61.45 $59.10 $1.69 $187.48* $193.32 $193.32* $204.24 $425.50 $306.36 $391.46 $289.34 $221.26 1 204.24 272.32 $2,314.72* LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI HUB ASSY /HUB LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI SHAFT LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI REPAIR PARTS LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI SPRING LONG, JEFF M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON $30.00 M.A.U.M.A. $30.00* $136.85 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. $264.12 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1 89.58 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 31.15 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. $521.70* 1566.01 MACKUBIN GROUP, THE 566.01* 141876 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4024 208570 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3708 208789 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3708 209053 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4173 209090 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4258 CONT ED /POLICE 102095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40719 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27641 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40879 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40884 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40944 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40953 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41044 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41019 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX MAUMA DUES 110195 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI TOW BAR 2958046 BROOM FOR SWEEPER 2958047 SHIM /PINION /OIL SEAL 2958164 INDICATOR CABLE 2958255 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4043 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 4043 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3710 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4273 BAR CODE SCANNER 26102395 UTILITY PROG MACH. & EQUIP 4156 $1,200.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1122 $1,200.00* $89.30 $63.75 $1,161.35 $93.25 $0.06 $1,878.25 $532.00 $14.80 $2,347.23 $49.90 $322.01 $1.75 $657.95 MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439341 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 439339 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441438 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441439 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441789 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441788 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441787 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 441760 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441758 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441759 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 441757 BALANCE DUE 439342 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 443828 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160363 11/06/95 $700.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 443827 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $12.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 444223 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $19.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 444201 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $22.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 444199 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $2,168.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 444198 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $912.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 444224 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $937.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 444197 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $295.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 445880 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $38.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 445881 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $2,314.45 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 446689 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $18.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 446690 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $14,652.40* 160364 11/06/95 $113.35 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 723056 ART SUPPLY GIP CST OF GD FOOD 3886 11/06/95 $76.72 MATHISON CO, THE OFFICE SUPPLIES 723963 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 4010 11/06/95 $28.70 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 724760 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4340 < *> $218.77* 160365 11/06/95 $481.38 MCCAREN DESIGN PLANTS 1002 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 3912 11/06/95 $123.54 MCCAREN DESIGN PLANTS,SOIL 1014 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 4375 < *> $604.92* 160366 11/06/95 $50.00 MCFGA MEMBERSHIP T ZIMMERMA 102095 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $50.00* 160367 11/06/95 $347.51 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL GRATES 0153244 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 3973 < *> $347.51* 160368 11/06/95 $371.95 MECO HOSE 69082 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3709 • 11/06/95 $60.84 MECO ADAPTER 69225 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4292 < *> $432.79* 160369 11/06/95 $26,553.12 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN HOSP PREM FOR 11/95 C 1415946 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 11/06/95 $100.65 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN HOSP PREM /11/95/M JAR 1417225 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $26,653.77* 160370 11/06/95 $32,858.06 MEDICA HOSP PREM 11/95 102095 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $32,858.06* 160371 11/06/95 $99.32 MEDZIS, ANDREW SW FIRE LEAGUE DINNER 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS < *> $99.32* 160372 11/06/95 $7.96 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 REPAIR PARTS 11362 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 4432 < *> $7.96* 160373 11/06/95 $53.89 MENARDS LUMBER 11166 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 4198 11106195 $5.08 MENARDS LUMBER 11168 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 4198 11/06/95 - $11.13 MENARDS LUMBER 11166CM CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 4198 < *> $47.84* 160374 11/06/95 $57.24 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40321 ART CENTER BLD CALCIUM CHLORI 3891 11/06/95 $495.54 MERIT SUPPLY TABLE 40282 PW BUILDING EQUIP REPLACEM 3967 11/06/95 $497.88 MERIT SUPPLY WASH & WAX 40308 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4076 11/06/95 $362.04 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40311 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 4183 11/06/95 $102.24 MERIT SUPPLY TEFLON LUBRICANT 40429 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 4087 COUNCIL-CH. REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160374 11/06/95 $153.04 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40470 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4090 11/06/95 $78.11 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40480 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 4227 11/06/95 $188.23 MERIT SUPPLY TISSUES /GLOVES 40499 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 4121 11/06/95 $31.95 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40502 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 4228 11/06/95 $326.95 MERIT SUPPLY MISC CLEANER 40542 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4282 11/06/95 $486.57 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40553 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 4390 11/06/95 $456.77 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40569 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 4396 11/06/95 $$383.92 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40601 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 4500 < *> $3,620.48* 160375 11/06/95 $100.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER COLLECTION FEES 102495 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $100.00* 160376 11/06/95 $372.30 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 9496 ARENA CONCESSI GENERAL SUPPLI 4154 11/06/95 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 9746 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 4393 < *> $ 344.60* 160377 11/06/95 $35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES TRACT /TAX SEARCH 534718 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* 160378 11/06/95 $4,998.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC SURCHARGE SEPT 199 GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES 11/06/95 $2,524.50 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC SURCHARGE AUGUST 1 GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES < *> $7,522.50* 160379 11/06/95 $289,612.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 100195 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR < *> $289,612.00* 160380 11/06/95 $267.75 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL FURNACE REPAIR 24836 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS < *> $267.75* . 160381 11/06/95 $510.00 MGCSA TURF MGMT CONFERENCE 103195 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $510.00* 160382 11/06/95 $2,362.71 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 6117MB PARK C.I.P. CIP 11/06/95 $4,198.85 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 6117MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $544.83 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 6117MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $52.58 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 2414MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE 11/06/95 $1,701.25 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 61178MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 11/06/95 $73.24 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 61178MB GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 11/06195 $4,010.62 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 61178MB PARK C.I.P. CIP 11/06/95 $26.64 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2482MB PARK C.I.P. CIP 11/06/95 $38.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. DUMPING CHARGES 2482MB STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE < *> $13,009.66* 160383 11/06/95 $145.65 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC WINDOWPANE 49530 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 4104 11/06/95 - $132.61 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC CREDIT 49532 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $13.04* 160384 11/06/95 $222.82 MIDWEST SPORTS MARKETING GENERAL SUPPLIES 122278 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 4215 < *> $222.82* 160385 11/06/95 $12.24 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER FEE 10000109 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 6581 < *> $12.24* 160386 11/06/95 $350.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S STOP BOX REPAIR 30712 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 4268 ;OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 22 ;HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR--------- -- DESCRIPTION - - - -- --- - - - - -- INVOICE --- PROGRAM--- - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM - --- •----------------------- 160386 11/06/95 ----------- $1,091.00 - - - - -- - -- - MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S - - - REPLACE SEWER LINE 30711 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 4266 11/06/95 $1,244.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE LINE 30720 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS P4417 11/06/95 $560.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE STOP BOX 30721 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS P4416 <*> $3,245.00* 160387 11/06/95 $79.00 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC 0 MLS 235243 .ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI c *> $79.00* 160388 11/06/95 $7,987.32 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA WATER PURCHASED 101395 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE < *> $7,987.32* 160389 11/06/95 $34.47 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA CO2 -POP 450845 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 4383 < *> $34.47* 160391 11/06/95 $30.13 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101695 110695 NORMANDALE GC FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT HEAT 11/06/95 11/06/95 $401.54 $195.69 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT 110695 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 11/06/95 $1,324.60 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 PW BUILDING HEAT 11/06/95 $423.25 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 11/06/95 $99.17 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 11/06/95 $37.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 POOL OPERATION HEAT 11/06/95 $131.35 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 11/06/95 $53.92 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 MAINT OF COURS HEAT HEAT 11/06/95 $190.59 MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT 110695 110695 GOLF DOME ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 11/06/95 11/06/95 $2,100.28 $493.28 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 ED BUILDING & HEAT 11/06/95 $188.54 MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 110695 PUMP & LIFT ST DISTRIBUTION HEAT HEAT 11/06/95 11/06/95 $1,149.90 $10.03 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT . 110695 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT ' 11/06/95 $18.97 MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT 110695 110695. YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT HEAT 11/06/95 11/06/95 $19.79 $125.14 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO HEAT 110695 ED BUILDING & HEAT < *> $6,993.56* 160392 11/06/95 $19.48 MINNEGASCO BARBEQUE REPAIR PARTS 0363961 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 4230 < *> $19.48* 160393 11/06/95 $281.26 MINNESOTA CLAY COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD 07523 ART SUPPLY GIF ART CENTER ADM CST OF GD FOOD CRAFT SUPPLIES 3890 4011 11/06/95 $401.87 MINNESOTA CLAY COMPANY CRAFT SUPPLIES 07946 <*> $683.13* 160394 11/06/95 $25.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL FUEL LICENSE 103095 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS <*> $25.00* 160395 11/06/95 $70.00 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC MONTHLY SERVICE 100372 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $$70.00* 160396 LE 11/06/95 $35.58 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO LEGAL ADVERTISING 17131 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING *> $51.90* 160397 11/06/95 $99.79 MINNESOTA UC FUND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANC 101895 CENT SVC GENER UNEMP COMP <*> $99.79* 160398 11/06/95 $8.56 MINNESOTA WANNER BALL VALVE 27463IN EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4057 COUNCIL CH. . REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -- -- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160398 11/06/95 $90 MINNESOTA WANNER SWING JOINT /GAUGE 27464IN EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4053 $69.90* 0399 1` 11/06/95 $2328 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY I CASSETTE TAPES 64270 CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLI 4333 . * 160400 11/06/95 $290.00 MN /AAPT REG ASPHALT CONF /JOHN 102595 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS .c*> $290.00* 160401 11/06/95 $191.45 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 52502 SIDEWALKS & PA GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $260.55 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 52727 SIDEWALKS & PA GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $280.55 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 54242 SIDEWALKS & PA CONCRETE 1006 11/06/95 $859.79 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 55471 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 11/06/95 $1,246.38 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 56122 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE *> $2,838.72* 160402 11/06/95 $30.15 MOORE MEDICAL EMS SUPPLIES 8209333 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 2606 11/06/95 115.75 MOORE MEDICAL AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 8305635 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3878 11106195 375.81 1521.71* MOORE MEDICAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES 8327295 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4241 <*> 160403 11/06/95 $15.00 MRPA MAILING LABELS /MRPA 002835 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES <*> $15.00* 160404 11/06/95 $21.17 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS I57493 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3367 11/06/95 $297.44 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION REPAIR PAR I57485 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3367 11/06/95 $491.01 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS I57734 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3370 11/06/95 $154.40 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I57737 MAINT OF COORS REPAIR PARTS 3369 11/06/95 $3.20 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO FLAG I67543 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3757 11/06/95 $173.46 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 168479 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4359 < *> $1,140.68* 160405 11/06/95 $292.03 MTS NORTHWEST SOUND INC MTS REPAIRED TRACK DO 322774 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 4320 < *> $292.03* 160406 11/06/95 $357.84 MUNICILITE CO SIREN HOUSING 6868 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3962 11/06/95 $200.54 MUNICILITE CO ROTATING BEACON 6883 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4033 11/06/95 - MUNICILITE CO CREDIT 6882 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 11/06/95 $$329.00 118.10 MUNICILITE CO STROBE LIGHT 6894 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4049 11/06/95 $85.25 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR PARTS - BEACON 6922 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 4093 11/06/95 $52.36 MUNICILITE CO BULBS 6945 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4262 11/06/95 $357.84 MUNICILITE CO SIREN HOUSING 6957 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4304 < *> $842.93* 160407 11/06/95 $43.00 MUZAK MUSIC AP 073112 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER < *> $43.00* 160408 11/06/95 $47.00 N.A.D.A. USED CAR GUIDE 100395 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $47.00* 160409 11/06/95 $487.05 NAME BRAND SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 100595 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 3911 < *> $487.05* 1`0410 11/06/95 1106.05* NAPA AUTO PARTS ENGINE PARTS 199957 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3971 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - -- - - - - INVOICE -- - - PROGRAM - -- -- - - -- OBJECT - -- -- - - - PO NUM --- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------- 160411 11/06/95 $70.00 -- - -- - NEHA DUES- MEICHSNER 101895 LABORATORY DUES DUES & SUHSCRI NATIONAL ENV. HEALTH ASS +� $140.00* 160412 11/06/95 $53.65 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PREV LIT 0230347 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTIO 3875 .C*> $53.65* 160413 11/06/95 $11.90 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB PRETZELS OPEN HOUSE POPCORN 421244 453481 POOL CONCESSIO FIRE DEPT. GEN CST OF GD FOOD FIRE PREVENTIO 3880 11/06/95 11/06/95 $90.93 $326.81 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB VAN VALKENBURG CONC 14135999 VANVALKENSURG CST OF GD FOOD 9507 *� $429.64* 160414 11/06/95 $320.00 NELSON, J THOMAS AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $320.00* 160415 11/06/95 $84.00 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN RADIO REPAIR SERVIC 24940 24943 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE 11/06/95 $20.00 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN LABOR ON RADIO LABOR ON RADIO 24942 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 11/06/95 $20.00 <*> $124.00* 160416 11/06/95 $356.50 NEXTEL MONTHLY CHARGE 875949 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 3773 < *> $356.50* 160417 11/06/95 $75.00 NORMAN, MIKE ART CTR INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES <*> $75.00* 11/06/95 $271.16 NORMED REPLACEMENT B.P.MONIT 09666171 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 3872 160418 <*> $271.16* 11/06/95 $396.18 NORTH STAR CONCRETE COMP CATCH BASIN /6715 IND 6949501 -GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 4085 160419 <*> $396.18* 160420 11/06/95 $53.89 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 114589 114696 MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 4363 4358 11/06/95 $111.59 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 114736 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4360 11/06/95 $21.72 $8.57 NORTH STAR TURF NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 114755 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4358 11/06/95 11/06/95 $23.32 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 114789 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4525 < *> $219.09* 160421 11/06/95 $30.07 NORTHERN AIRGAS OXYGEN 224664 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 8125 <*> $30.07* 160422 11/06/95 $519.49 NORTHERN IMPRINT & EMBRO Sweatshirts 3031 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 4394 <*> $519.49* 160423 11/06/95 $60.44 NORTHERN SUPPLIES 331186TI 33270STI MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI REPAIR PARTS 3985 3991 11/06/95 $372.74 NORTHERN SMALL ENGINE < *> $433.18* 160424 11/06/95 $55.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD MI 21484 MI 21483 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $37.20 NORTHSTAR ICE NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 21765 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 11/06/95 105.18 1327.78* 129.60 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 23338 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> COUNCIL, Cl REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 25 'CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160425 11/06/95 $47.97 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 235321 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4007 11/06/95 $303.61 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 235548 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4008 11/06/95 $149.28 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 235880 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4012 11/06/95 $109.49 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 236003 ART SUPPLY GIP CST OF GD FOOD 4014 11/06/95 $246.93 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 236225 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 4337 < *> $857.28* 160426 11/06/95 $106.63 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRE REPAIR NW24328 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 4052 11/06/95 $35.23 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TUBE NW24359 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 4052 11/06/95 $98.69 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW24399 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 4052 11/06/95 138.25 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO DISPOSE TIRES NW24496 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 4052 11/06/95 265.72 1644.52* NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO FLOOR DRY NW24495 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4052 < *> 160429 11/06/95 $193.73 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $78.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $55.75 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $42.87 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $30.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $1,610.65 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $5.60 NSP LIGHT & POWER 103195 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $25,208.43 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $6,659.99 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $3,223.07 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $247.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $26.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $1,385.60 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $1,721.31 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $35.67 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 PIT BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $591.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $3,553.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $2,665.05 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $301.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $164.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $261.55 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $7,735.86 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $147.84 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 GUN RANGE LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $6,178.05 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $23,938.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $21.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $686.80 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $169.80 NSP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110695 AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES 11/06/95 $1,267.85 NSP LIGHT. & POWER 110695 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $747.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $1,280.44 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 11/06/95 $69.88 NSP LIGHT & POWER 110695 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER < *> $90,359.62* 160430 11/06/95 $150.00 NYHLENS FILTER RECYCLING OIL FILTERS FOR RECYC 7256 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS < *> $150.00* 160431 11/06/95 $221.85 O.B. OF MINNEAPOLIS INC ALUM, CURB ADAP 16863 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3702 < *> $221.85* 4CIL CHEt-K REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 26 :K NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - -- INVOICE ----- PROGRAM -- - -- - ----- - - OBJECT - - -- -- - PO NUM --- - - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3432 11/06/95 $341.57 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE BINDER CHAIN /LOAD BIN 108940 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4098 r> $341.57* 3433 11/06/95 $223.00 OLSON, MIKE BEER LINES 102395 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 8150 *> $223.00* 0434 11/06/95 $334.42 OLWIN, ROGER CONT ED /HTE /ICC USER 101295 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS *> $334.42* 0435 11/06/95 $456.46 OLYMPIC POOLS FOUNTAIN SHUT DOWN 3770 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 4479 *> $456.46* 0436 11/06/95 $198.00 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM TYPEWRITER SERVICE CO 269710 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI 11/06/95 $2,001.36 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM CASHIER COMPUTER 270651 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM *> $2,199.36* 0437 11/06/95 $232.81 ORR SCHELEN MAYERON & AS ELECTRICAL SERVICES 00415632 UTILITIES -GRAN CIP *> $232.81* 0438 11/06/95 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 3913070 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD CST OF GD FOOD 8155 8155 11/06/95 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 3913387 GRILL *> $148.00* 0439 11/06/95 $749.80 OWENS SERVICE CO ICE RINK REPAIR CHEMICAL FOR BOILER 96858 97057 ED BUILDING & CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 4055 11/06/95 11/06/95 $187.21 $87.00 OWENS SERVICE CO OWENS SERVICE CO ICE RINK REPAIR 97283 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 4135 11/06/95 $87.00 OWENS SERVICE CO POOL PAK FAN CHECK 97328 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES *> $1,111.01* 0440 11/06/95 $16.00 P.T.I. PUBLICATIONS LOCAL GOVT GUIDE 103095 COMMUNICATIONS BOOKS P PAMPHL *> $16.00* 0441 11/06/95 $90.00 PACE INCORPORATED WATER ANALYSIS 22976 WATER TREATMEN PROF SERVICES 4268 *> $90.00* 0442 11/06/95 $43.18 PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES PAGER FEE A023654 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5033 *> $43.18* 0443 11/06/95 $16,390.00 PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION ROOF REPAIR 95 -1 PARK CIP CIP *> $16,390.00* 0444 11/06/95 $681.60 PAPER CALMENSON & COMPAN ROLLED STEEL RINK COR 26796801 PARK C.I.P. CIP P3819 *> $681.60* 0445 11/06/95 $350.62 PARADIGM SPORTS INC ELECT CADDY PRO MERCH 23056 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9615 *> $350.62* 0446 11/06/95 $40.40 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE HEP B SHOT EXAM 082695 092395 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES PHYS EXAMS 11/06/95 11/06/95 $155.00 $100.32 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE RETURN TO WORK HEARING TEST 100795 GENERAL MAINT PROF SERVICES : *> $$$295.72* 0447 11/06/95 $85.00 PARKER, ELAINE PERFORMANCE AT EDINBO 110995 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER : *> $85.00* COUNCIL'CH. REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 160; 11/06/95 2 PARSONS, E. DUDLEY MAG EXPENSES 103095 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 00.00* 160449 11/06/95 -$6.00 PARTS PLUS CREDIT /BRAKE SHOE 1074222 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $59.43 PARTS PLUS WIX FILTER /FILTER 1076668 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $4.81 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1078530 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $55.27 PARTS PLUS WIX FILTER /FILTER 1079337 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $45.16 PARTS PLUS SPORT UTILITY SH 1079036 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $367.72 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1080239 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $46.16 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1081455 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $13.74 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1082473 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $25.88 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1082288 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $190.29 PARTS PLUS FILTER /BRAKE SHOE 1083324 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06195 $129.98 PARTS PLUS EXH PIPE /MUFFLER 1082883 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/06/95 $44.97 PARTS PLUS CALIPER 1083806 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS c *� $977.41* 160450 11/06/95 $120.00 PATTIWORKS INC PROF SERVICES 1061 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $120.00* 1`0451 11/06/95 PAUL'S RENTAL & SALES IN EQUIPMENT RENTAL 241545 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 3681 44.94* 160453 11/06/95 - $76.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM1065 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 -$8.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM1009 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $1,477.45 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56000 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $27.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56001 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $789.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56004 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $65.40 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 56003 BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE . 11/06/95 $959.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56002 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $115.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 56005 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $659.65 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56238 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $226.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56239 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $354.20 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56237 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $55.98 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56390 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $110.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56497 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 373.75 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56496 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 527.60 1331.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56499 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56498 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,990.58* 160454 11/06/95 $34.24 PELLA PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 96984 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 4032 < *.> $34.24* 160455 11/06/95 -$0.04 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY CREDIT BALANCE DUE 093095 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 39.00 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 41393410 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 93.10 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41393409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 65.90 151.30 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41893207 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41993209 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *� $249.26* 160456 11/06/95 $20.00 PETERSON, DAVID PRO SERVICES DELIVER 102095 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $20.00* 160457 11/06/95 $474.00 PHYSIO CONTROL MAINT AGREEMENT LIFEP D58720 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 8118 COUNCIL CHEt-K REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 28 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ---PO- NUM - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160457 11/06/95 $264.69 PHYSIO CONTROL AMBULANCE SUPPLIES A41097 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4232 < *> $738.69* 160458 11/06/95 $10.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 49474. YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $51.95 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15124 YORK SELLING CST OF CD WINE 11/06/95 $119.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32951 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $392.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32952 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $63.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 32978 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $141.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32977 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $21.90 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32979 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $58.90 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32981 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $859.45* 160459 11/06/95 $1,552.31 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 6882 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING P2750 11/06/95 $251.65 PIP PRINTING WATER BILL INSERT 14016864 GENERAW BILLIN PRINTING < *> $1,803.96* 160460 11/06/95 $400.00 PIRKL ASSOC, THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $400.00* 160461 11/06/95 $66.00 PITMAN, ANN CLASS REFUND 101895 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $66.00* 160462 11/06/95 12.25 POKORNY COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 15478 15496 CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 3802 3983 11/06/95 26.84 139.09* POKORNY COMPANY REPAIR PARTS < *, 160463 11/06/95 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 103095 -CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $5,000.00* 160464 11/06/95 $32.00 •POTAZEK, BETT AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $32.00* 160465 11/06/95 $3,540.00 PRECISION DYNAMICS WRISTBANDS 344974 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 4132 < *> $3,540.00* 160466 11/06/95 $990.32 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA CHEMICALS COURSE SUPPLIES /DRAIN 006883 006899 MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLI 4332 4364 11/06/95 11/06/95 $479.25 $$330.24 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA CHEMICALS 006936 MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS 4365 < *> $1,799.81* 160467 11/06/95 $1,801.90 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES REP DUMP BODY 10465 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 3965 < *> $1,801.90* 160468 11/06/95 $51.87 PRINT SHOP, THE PRINTING 27421 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 4410 < *> $51.87* 160469 11/06/95 $294.07 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE ROCK -SAND 093095 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $294.07* 160470 11/06/95 $544.50 QUALITY INSULATION INC RE INSULATE ATTIC 102695 CDBG FROG PROF SERVICES < *> $544.50* 160471 11/06/95 $60.00 RAINS, DIANE PERFORMANCE EDINBOROU 112195 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $60.00* COUNCIL CH REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM ART WORK SOLD page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160472 11/06/95 $103.70 RED WING SHOES BOOTS 582 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 4259 < *> 10654 $103.70* CONTR REPAIRS 4630 REPAIR 10986 160473 11/06/95 $424.41 REM SUPPLIES LIGHT BULBS- SHOVEL 6077 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4397 < *> $424.41* 160474 11/06/95 $114.00 RETAIL DATA SYSTEM OF MI CASH REGISTER MAINT 44785 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $114.00* 160476 160477 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 11106/95 160478 11/06/95 c *> 160479 11/06/95 11/06/95 160480 11/06/95 160481 11/06/95 160482 11/06/95 160483 11/06/95 160484 11/06/95 11/06/95 11/06/95 $10.00 3.75 - 1.35 $1,188.50 $32.90 $1,657.85 $752.85 $16.45 $9.00 $2,625.10 $1,417.45 $16.45 $384.00 $8.00 1 2,727.69 1,944.79 1,963.59 $18.00 $14,767.52* 1490.63 490.63* REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 146593, COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 147126, COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148088, COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150555 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 150555 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150552 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150545 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 150546 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150553 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 151261 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 151265 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 151266 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 151705 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 152179 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 152177 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 152185 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 152187 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 152186 RHINO LINING MIDWEST INC LINE BOX IN TRUCK 7815 $84.00 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA URINAL LINE P.D. $84.00* $161.98 RIEDELL SHOES SKATES $241.14 RIEDELL SHOES SKATES $403.12* $2,145.19 RIEKENA, JOE $2,145.19* $75.00 RIFFEY, JANE $75.00* $25.36 RITZ CAMERA $25.36* $57.13 ROAD RESCUE $57.13* $101.25 ROBERT B. HILL $180.91 ROBERT B. HILL $41.27 ROBERT B. HILL $323.43* 7284 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE SOTH ST SELLIN CST of GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 1. EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 1638 5007255 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4133 5008276 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4133 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 103195 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER PHOTO FINISHING 3756659 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 4235 FLASHERS 157419 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3687 REPAIR 10654 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 4630 REPAIR 10986 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 4631 SSALT 49785 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 8127 COUNCIL CHEt-K REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160485 11/06/95 $107.43 ROBERT H. HAM ASSOC LTD GENERAL SUPPLIES 37562 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 3887 < *> $107.43* 160486 11/06/95 $516.26 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 52393 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 8748 11/06/95 $90.58 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 52448 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 8748 11/06/95 $89.59 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 52914 ••MAINT ' OF COURS GASOLINE 8748 11/06/95 $6,277.15 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 53152 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 11/06/95 $52.04 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 53493 NORMAN. MAINT. GASOLINE 8748 11/06/95 $317.16 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 53490 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 8748 < *> $7,342.78* 160487 11/06/95 $60.27 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING 103095 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS < *> $60.27* 160488 11/06/95 $106.27 ROTHE, ALLEN PETTY CASH 101695 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $106.27* 160489 11/06/95 $79.00 RUD, RIC CLASS REFUND 101095 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $79.00* 160490 11/06/95 $29.90 RUDQUIST, MONICA ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $29.90* 160491 11/06/95 $35.34 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO SWITCH 82525 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4064 < *> $35.34* 160492 11/06/95 $1,633.44 RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP ARCHITECT FEES 1 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP < *> $1,633.44* 160493 •11/06/95 $360.00 RUSSELL, JOHN CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CE 103195 ART CENTER 'ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $360.00* 160494 11/06/95 $208.19 RYERSON INC LAWN STRIP 23523140 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4402 < *> $208.19* 160495 11/06/95 $165.08 SAFETY KLEEN HAZ WASTE DISP 253681 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 11/06/95 $365.00 SAFETY KLEEN SAFETY SUPPLIES P24731 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 4362 < *> $530.08* 160496 11/06/95 $145.70 SALUD AMERICA COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 249 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $145.70* 160497 11/06/95 1,217.40 SAMARITAN TIRE CO INC TIRES 5656 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 11/06/95 11,673.70 SAMARITAN TIRE CO INC TIRES 5901 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 < *> $2,891.10* 160498 11/06/95 $50.29 SAMUELSON, RONALD PIZZA FOR WORKERS /OPE 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS 11/06/95 $4.77 SAMUELSON, RONALD LUNCH /ARSON CLASS 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $55.06* 160499 11/06/95 $2,864.45 SCHMIDT. MICHAEL CLAY TARGETS 114045 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 4018 < *> $2,864.45* 160500 11/06/95 $143.05 SCHMITZ, DALE CONT ED /EMT SCHOOL /PO 103095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> 5143.05* COUNCIL.CH REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 31 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160501 11/06/95 $115.50 SCHMITZ, THOMAS FIRE INSTRUCTOR COURS 102595 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 11/06/95 $90.00 SCHMITZ, THOMAS SW MN EMS CORP FEE 102595 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $205.50* 160502 11/06/95 $6,290.00 SELA ROOFING & REMODELIN NEW ROOF /REPAIR SIDIN 102595 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $6,290.00* 160503 11/06/95 $2,145.19 SEVERUD, KEN 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES < *> $2,145.19* 160504 11/06/95 $27.30 SHARKEY, KAY ART WORK SOLD 101895 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $27.30* 160505 11/06/95 $95.46 SHERATON WORLD ROOM CONFIRMATION CON 102495 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $95.46* 160506 11/06/95 - $78.08 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CREDIT 78135 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 8103 11/06/95 $367.78 SHERWIN WILLIAMS MISC PAINT MATERIALS 45123 STREET NAME SI PAINT 3828 11/06/95 $54.30 SHERWIN WILLIAMS BRUSHES 89413 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 4082 11/06/95 $281.96 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 59637 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 3532 < *> $625.96* 160507 11/06/95 $51.12 SIITARI, MICHAEL BOOKS & PAMPHLETS /POL 102095 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> $51.12* 160508 11/06/95 $75.00 SIKORA, LINDA AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 160509 11/06/95 $458.08 HERMAN- HUNTINGTON METALLIZED BAGS YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $458.08* .SILFEN- .102795 . 160510 11/06/95 $397.95 SIMPLY COUNTRY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 200925 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3327 < *> $397.95* 160511 11/06/95 $2,145.19 SMITH, CORY 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES < *> $2,145.19* 160512 11/06/95 $179.03 SNAP -ON -TOOLS HARDWARE 21536352 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 4426 < *> $179.03* 160513 11/06/95 $16.72 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM SURVEY SUPPLIES 8001960R ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4355 < *> $16.72* 160514 11/06/95 $1,077.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55013 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $21.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 55014 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $1,483.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55009 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $3,344.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55271 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $53.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 55272 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/06/95 $2,187.45 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55466 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06195 $911.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55466 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $10.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 55469 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $9,090.70* 160515 11/06/95 $64.88 SPECKMAN, GAIL BOOKS SOLD AT THE EAC 101895 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 11/06/95 $487.50 SPECKMAN, GAIL AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHEL& REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 32 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT -- -------- VENDOR --------------- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- DESCRIPTION - -- INVOICE- PROGRAM -- --- - -- - -- OBJECT - -PO -NUM - - -- ----------------------------- <*> $552.38* 160516 11/06/95 $34.27 SPS BALL VALVE 2435307 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4041 11/06/95 $139.43 SPS IRRIGATION REPAIR PAR 2436738 GENERAL TURF C REPAIR PARTS 4072 11/06/95 $56.93 SPS THERMOSTAT 2436739 BUILDINGS REPAIR PARTS 4073 11106195 $17.08 SPS GLOVES & REPAIR PARTS 2438482 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4095 11/06/95 $29.23 SPS PLUMBING 2438483 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4109 11/06/95 $1.97 SPS UNION /NUT /SLEEVE 2440927 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4122 < *> $278.91* 160517 11/06/95 $23.30 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN SEAL KIT SI34385 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3667 11/06/95 $23.30 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN SEAL KIT SI34385 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3667 11/06/95 $210.35 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN REPAIR WORK SW09990 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 4285 < *> $256.95* 160518 11/06/95 $154.35 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 64139 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3587 11/06/95 $323.36 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 64138 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3587 < *> $477.71* 160519 11/06/95 $323.60 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS PRO MERCH 65039 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3587 < *> $323.60* 160520 11/06/95 $8,787.50 STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION PROF SERVICES 101195 HUMAN RELATION PROF SERVICES < *> $8,787.50* 160521 11/06/95 $964.20 STREICHERS RESERVES EQUIP REPLAC 360081 RESERVE PROGRA EQUIP REPLACEM 4206 < *> $964.20* 160522 11/06/95 $1$775.00• S REPLACEM STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH CONSULTING SVCFAIRVI 0942147 ENGINEERING GE OFSERVICES PROF M < *> $1,890.48* 160523 11/06/95 $53.52 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE 18236 181261 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 4103 4103 11/06/95 11/06/95 $43.13 $172.81 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PIPE ASM BRAKE PAD KITS 18261 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4111 11/06/95 $3.40 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET ARM ASSEMBLY 18557 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4271 11/06/95 $3.40 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET ARM ASSEMBLY 18554 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4272 11/06/95 $8.95 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CABLE ASSM, 19220 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4436 < *> $285.21* 160524 11/06/95 $408.89 SUBURBAN PROPANE L.P. FUELS 101795 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE < *> $408.89* 160525 11/06/95 $159.55 SUPERAMERICA LP GAS /STREET 101395 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 4105 11/06/95 $29.82 SUPERAMERICA LP GAS /PARKS 101395 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE c *> $189.37* 160526 11/06/95 $130.89 SUPERIOR FORD PARTS 254337 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4099 < *> $130.89* 160527 11/06/95 $29.63 SURE PLUS MANUFACTURING MIRROR 202479 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3811 < *> $29.63* 160528 11/06/95 $332.00 SWANSON, KAENA AC INSTRUCTOR 103195 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $332.00* COUNCIL - Cf REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 33 -CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160529 11/06/95 $5 .70 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT ANSWERING SERVICE 101695 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 0* 160530 11/06/95 $39.81 TELEX COMMUNICATIONS MICROPHONE PARTS 815926 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 4408 < *> $39.81* 160531 11/06/95 $139.37 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO ADHESIVE /TAPE 5791200 GENERAL(BILLIN MCQUIRE PARK 4276 11/06/95 $30.56 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO MISC HARDWARE 5791201 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4276 < *> $169.93* 160532 11/06/95 $2,737.05 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 67584 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11106/95 $2,303.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 68071 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 $2,212.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 68459 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $7,252.35* 1`0533 11/06/95 $36.95 THUESON, JAMES BOOKS SOLD AT THE EAC 101895 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER $ * 160534 11/06/95 $141.70 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2884264 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9037 11/06/95 $372.84 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2884265 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9037 11/06/95 $105.43 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2896594 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9037 11/06/95 $912.96 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2899393 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9037 < *> $1,532.93* 160535 11/06/95 $127.50 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL CYLINDER RENTAL 516796 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $35.35 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 337151 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 4071 < *> $162.85* 160536 11/06/95 $137.97 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I REGISTER RECIEPT PAPE 9537 SOTH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 . $413.137.97 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I REGISTER RECIEPT PAPE 9537 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06/95 $$7 9 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I REGISTER RECIEPT PAPE 953 7 VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> 160537 11/06/95 $4,653.22 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GASOLINE 94251 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $4,653.22* 160538 11/06/95 $185.98 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT COST OF GOODS SOLD 199311 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3888 < *> $185.98* 160539 11/06/95 $6.27 TROPHY WORLD PLATES (HOLE IN ONE) 12708 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 4376 11/06/95 $12.51 TROPHY WORLD EXPLORERS- GENERAL SU 12773 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $18.78* 160540 11/06/95 $18.16 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN REPAIRS 365960 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3873 11/06/95 $45.00 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN REPAIRS 365960 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3873 11/06/95 $45.50 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN REPAIRS 365959 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3873 11/06/95 $22.50 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN REPARIS 365959 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3873 11/06/95 $84.00 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN & NITROUS 365899 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3873 11/06/95 $11.18 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 369980 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3873 11/06/95 $44.25 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 369949 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3873 11/06/95 $35.94 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO REGULATOR REPAIR 374499 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3873 < *> $306.53* 160541 11/06/95 $511.20 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO BLOWERS 2554 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4223 < *> $511.20* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 34 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM --- OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - -- ----------------------- 160542 11/06/95 - ------ $8.63 - - - - -- TYCOS TNSTRI►MF.NTS -- ------ INC - - - - -- --------------------------------------- EMS REPAIR PARTS 410361 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3879 < *> $8.63* 160543 11/06/95 $793.70 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 101295 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 11/06/95 $203.94 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 101295 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $997.64* 160544 11/06/95 $371.46 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS FERTILIZER 0010235 ED-BUILDING & FERTILIZER 4635 11/06/95 $924.67 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS FERTILIZER 0010248 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER 4218 < *> $1,296.13* 160545 11/06/95 $20.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OAK WILT LAB TESTING 101795 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES < *> $20.00* 160546 11/06/95 $180.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PROPERTY VALUE SHORT 101695 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $180.00* 160547 11/06/95 $54.26 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 100195 PARKING MONITO TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $5.72 US WEST CELLULAR US WEST CELLULAR 102095 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $27.72 US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1116161 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 11/06/95 $27.72 US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1116205 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 11/06/95 $27.72 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 102095 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $13.40 US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1116108 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $156.54* 160548 11/06/95 $1,147.88 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $108.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $449.40 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695. SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $125.78 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 SENIOR CITIZEN TELFFIIONE • 11/06/95 $396.26 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $761.28 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $191.34 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $614.25 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $277.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER 110695 ED BUILDING & ADVERT OTHER 11/06/95 $399.57 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $113.59 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $186.32 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 11/06/95 $211.80 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 110695 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE < *> $4,983.00* 160549 11/06/95 $5.33 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PHONE A287314M CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> $5.33* 160550 11/06/95 $5,033.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST SERVICES A287034M UTILITIES -GRAN CIP < *> $5,033.53* 160551 11/06/95 $4,435.00 USAQUATICS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10348 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $4,435.00* 160552 11/06/95 $90.00 USGA PINS /DIVOTS A0933870 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 3629 < *> $90.00* 160553 11/06/95 $46.04 VACUUM CENTER VACUUM REPAIR 17463 GOLF ADMINISTR CONTR REPAIRS 4199 < *> $46.04* COUNCIL-Cl REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 35 'CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160554 11/06/95 $1,700.00 VALLEY PAVING INC ST RECLAIM 950682 STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS 3105 < *> $1,700.00* 160555 11/06/95 - $452.20 VAN PAPER CO. credit 0076189 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 11/06/95 $245.22 VAN PAPER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 80817 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 11/06195 $1,438.16 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 086312 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 4160 11/06/95 $2 657.28 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 085543 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 4160 11/06/95 539.32 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 086096 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 4160 11/06/95 $2,007.63 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 085605 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 4160 11/06/95 $1,778.39 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 085824 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 4160 11/06/95 $267.80 VAN PAPER CO. T.P. /TOWELS 086523 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $8,481.62* 160556 11/06/95 $2,145.19 VANDELAC, MATT 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES < *> $2,145.19* 160557 11/06/95 $496.50 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 13658 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 4608 < *> $496.50* 160558 11/06/95 $111.60 VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAGS 013597 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 4315 < *> $111.60* 160559 11/06/95 $76.00 VENDORS SUPPLY & SERVICE REPAIR 385907 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 4629 < *> $76.00* 160560 11/06/95 $25.00 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC SOFTWARE DEMO 313936 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $25.00* 160561 11/06/95 $25.72 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 2776 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 4366 < *> $25.72* 160562 11/06/95 $200.46 VESSCO C/2 PARTS 8413 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1188 < *> $200.46* 160563 11/06/95 $61.66 VFW POST #5555 8 MON AD 101295 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 11/06/95 $61.66 VFW POST #5555 8 MON AD 101295 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 11/06/95 $61.68 VFW POST #5555 8 MON AD 101295 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $185.00* 160564 11/06/95 $83.50 VOGT HEATING & AIR CONDT JOB CANCELLED 5629 IN 95002027 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $83.50* 160565 11/06/95 $79.83 WALSER FORD LAMP ASM 35794 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4293 11/06/95 $28.81 WALSER FORD HANDLE ASY /CONTROL AS 35851 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4462 < *> $108.64* 160566 11/06/95 $463.28 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO PLASTIC A -FRAME 5572 RETAINING WALL CONTR REPAIRS 4081 < *> $463.28* 160567 11/06/95 $385.21 WATER PRO CURB STOPS 742718 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4294 < *> $385.21* 160568 11/06/95 $286.14 WEBER & TROSETH INC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 6475 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 4499 < *> $286.14* NCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 36 CK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - - -- OBJECT PO NUM - - --------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0569 11/06/95 $2,145.19 WERRE, JIM 1995 PRO COMMISSION 102495 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES *> $2,145.19* 0570 11/06/95 290.53 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. CO. DRILL BITS NOZZLE /BIT /TAP 95302072 95302774 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 4107 4279 11/06/95 224.69 1515.22* WEST WELD SUPPLY *> 0571 11/06/95 $12.80 WESTLINK PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 100195 PARK MAINTENAN RUBBISH REMOVA 4446 *> $12.80* 0572 11/06/95 $213.89 WICK, FLORENCE DUPLICATE PAYMENT 942 101095 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES *> $213.89* 0573 11/06/95 $34.74 WILLIAMS STEEL RUST SPRAY OLEUM SPRAY PAINT PAIN 64314101 64646501 BUILDINGS PARKING LOTS GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI 3951 SUPPLI 4269 11/06/95 $27.15 WILLIAMS STEEL *> $61.89* 0574 11/06/95 $440.64 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 10568630 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9036 *> $440.64* 0575 11/06/95 $900.00 WILSON'S NURSERY SUMAC PLANTING -VV RD 019952 GENERAL MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 4129 *> $900.00* 0576 11/06/95 $162.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 9078 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF CST OF GD WINE GD WINE 11/06/95 $280.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 9077 9079 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 11/06/95 $234.70 $279.80 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 9335 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE BEE 11/06/95 $104.15 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 9336 50TH ST SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST OF CST OF GDS GD WINE 11/06/95 $178.85 WINE COMPANY, THE COMPANY, THE COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI BE 9338 9339 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/06/95 11/06/95 $4.4.90 $461.70 WINE WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 9639 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE WINE 11/06/95 $192.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 9643 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD : *> $1,939.25* 0577 11/06/95 $163.52 WINEBERG, DON MILEAGE 101295 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE : *> $163.52* 0578 11/06/95 $600.00 WISCONSIN CLEARINGHOUSE PAMPHLETS 15879 SPEC PROJ DONA BOOKS & PAMPHL 4612 *> $600.00* 0579 11/06/95 $28.00 WOLFF, RAY RECERT /FEE EMT REFRES 102395 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS : *> $28.00* ;0580 11/06/95 $60.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47197 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE WINE 11/06/95 -$3.40 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 47219 47307 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF CST OF GD GD WINE 11/06/95 325.25 WORLD CLASS WINES CLASS WINES INC INC COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD LI 47304 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/06/95 11/06/95 731.95 588.25 1217.00 WORLD WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47306 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47429 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF CST OF GD WINE GD WINE 11/06/95 $461.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC INC COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 47432 47431 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 11/06/95 $865.20 - $276.00 WORLD CLASS WINES WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47402 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $57.10 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47602 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF CST OF GD WINE GD WINE 11/06/95 $121.70 WORLD CLASS WINES WINES INC INC COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 47603 47604 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/06/95 $72.85 WORLD CLASS COUNCrIL•C1 REGISTER WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:43 PM page 37 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $3,221.15* 160581 11/06/95 WUTCHIETT, SUSAN CLASS REFUND 091695 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 126.00* 160582 11/06/95 $70.24• ZACK'S INCORPORATED SHOP SUPPLIES 2031 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 4171 $899,$325.84* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, NOV 1, 1995, 7:45 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $246,655.87 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $8,069.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $1,307.89 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $4,256.57 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $13,870.66 SWIMMING FUND # 27 GOLF $57,115.02 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $12,880.35 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE FUND $3,098.94 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $24,806.34 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $355,183.32 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $1,509.07 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $100,912.48 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $65,011.84 $89.9,325.84* I