Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-20_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 20, 1996 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of February 5, 1996 PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 02/14/96 Total $3,380.25 Rollcall required III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF DORAN WALTZER, RETIRING PARK DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE WORKER PRESENTATION OF AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATORS. TO POLICE DEPARTMENT BY FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 5, 1996 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1995 -9, An ordinance amending Code Section 850.11 Subd (A) allowing day care as a conditional use in an R -1 Single Dwelling District B. Public Hearing Request for Conditional Use Permit, Steve and Priscilla Williams, Especially For Children, 5015 West 70th Street. (Contd. from 02/05/96). C. Public Hearing Request for Conditional Use Permit, City of Edina, Paramedic (EMS) /Fire Station, Yorktown Park. D. Public Hearing Appeal of Variance Request, Dale and Barb Kelash, 5104 Gorgas Avenue. III. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Utility and Drainage Easement - Outlots A & B, THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADDITION. IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council to pass. A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1995 -13. An Ordinance creating new Code Section 740 requiring licensing and annual inspections of underground parking garages of multiple residential buildings. (Contd. from 01/02/96) Agenda /Edina City Council February 20, 1996 Page Two AA VI VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. Mon Mon Mon Tues Mon Mon Mon Tues Mon Tues Wed Mon AWARD OF BIDS A. Purchase of 1996'/ ton Pick -up Truck, Engineering Department. B. Purchase of 1996 % ton Pick -up Truck, Street Department. C. Purchase of 1996 % ton Pick -up Truck, Utility Department. D. Purchase of 1996 314 ton 4 x 4 Pick -up Truck, Utility Department. E. Purchase of 1996 one ton Cab and Chassis Pick -up Truck, Utility Department. F. Purchase of 1996 one ton Cab and Chassis Pick -up Truck, Street Department. G. Purchase of 1996 % ton Extended Cab Pick -up Truck, Utility Department. H. Purchase of annual street sweeper broom stock, Street Department. I. Purchase of one Toro gas greensmaower for Braemar Golf Course. J. Purchase of two 5 gang fairway mowers for Braemar Golf Course. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Request for Traffic Signal, 60th & Xerxes. B. Boards /Commissions /Committee Appointments. C: Park Referenda Resolution. D. Request from the City of Bloomington for watermain extension behind the National Car Rental Building. E. Hennepin County Preliminary Bikeway Plan Discussion. F. Report Annual Bridge Certification. G. 1995 Annual Recycling Report. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MANAGERS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/14/96 TOTAL: $564,032.61 and for confirmation of Payment of Claims dated 02/09/96 TOTAL: $480,851.63 Rollcall required Mar 4 Mar 18 Mar 18 Mar 19 Apr 1 Apr 15 Apr 22 Apr 23 May 6 May 7 May 8 May 20 UP .. 9MINGMEETIRP Regular Council Meeting Joint Meeting with School Board Regular Council Meeting Boards /Commissions /Council Annual Meeting Regular Council Meeting Regular Council Meeting Board of Review Volunteer Award Reception Regular Council Meeting Special Election Park Referenda Special Council Meeting Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY CENTER 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00 P.M. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH PARK 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS (Polls Open 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.) 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS w�lr��r'L - Cn C City of Edina RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Steve and Priscilla Williams, 5015 West 70th Street for operation as a day care facility with the following conditions: Developers dedicate appropriate right -of -way to allow construction of the new signalized intersection at West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard; and 2. Developers agree to a special assessment in the amount of $25,000.00 spread over ten years for the improvements to West 70th Street. Developers waive any right of appeal to aforementioned special assessment; and 3. Developers construct and pay for the north .site driveway configuration as part of their development plan. Adopted this 20th day of February 1996. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of February, 1996. Debra A. Mang, n, CRytlerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 5, 1996 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider the Redevelopment Agreement for Kunz Parts Plus and Laurent/Park Development. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Richards. Commissioner /Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:04 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Maetzold and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards "MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1996, APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Maetzold and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the HRA Minutes of January 16, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. JOINT REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED FOR KUNZ PARTS PLUS AND LAURENT /PARK DEVELOPMENT Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file, a public hearing was conducted. Presentation by Staff /Consultant Planner Larsen reviewed the two requested actions: the Preliminary Rezoning to POD -1 for the property at 5229 Eden Avenue and Final Development Plan of Kunz Oil at 5200 Eden Circle. Laurent/Park Development requested rezoning the northerly five plus acre parcel called the "Lewis" property from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Planned Office District (POD -1). This rezoning would allow redevelopment of the property with a 94,500 sq. ft. office development. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning with four conditions: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 3) Roadway /access easement, and 4) Watershed District permits. Kunz Parts Plus Warehouse requested approval of Final Development Plan allowing expansion of their existing warehouse to approximately 37,800 sq. ft. The building and. loading docks have been redesigned to accommodate truck traffic entering and exiting the site from Eden Avenue via an easement through the office development. Eden Circle has been redesigned on the easterly end to discourage cut - through traffic while maintaining a second means of egress for the Richmond Hills neighborhood and providing full access for public safety vehicles. The storm water retention pond in the southeasterly portion of the site provides most of the required storage for the Kunz site, the office development, and for the existing warehouse south of the Kunz property. The pond is a requirement of the National Urban Run-Off Program (NURP). In addition, twenty parking stalls have been eliminated from the south parking lot to increase the amount of green area on the site. The Kunz's proposed plan requires three variances: one for parking quantity, a drive aisle setback variance along the railroad property, and a building setback variance at the northerly property line. Planner Larsen concluded that Staff recommended approval of Final Development Plan subject to: 1) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 2) Roadway /access easement, 3) Proof of Parking Agreement, 4) Watershed District permits, and 5) Redevelopment Agreement. Planner Larsen introduced Fred Hoisington of Hoisington Koegler Inc., the City's Planning Consultant for the Grandview Redevelopment Area. Mr. Hoisington reviewed the original proposal received for the Kunz and Lewis properties, then showed its evolution to the plan presently before the HRA/Council. Problems existing in the area included the Eden Avenue access was essentially a driveway through a parking lot and not a public right of way, and parking distribution. Mr. Hoisington stressed that all interested parties cooperated to achieve the plan as proposed this evening. Commissioner Maetzold expressed concern with trucks still using Eden Circle and asked if the City could sign the area restricting truck traffic. Planner Larsen replied that he believed the City could sign the area to prevent trucks from using Eden Circle. Engineer Hoffman added that Eden Circle is a local street and the City may be as restrictive as they choose. Proponent Comment Walter Kunz, Kunz Parts Plus Warehouse, 5200 Eden Circle, stated he agreed that trucks use the new access. Mr. Kunz said that once truckers become familiar with the Kunz warehouse location, keeping trucks off Eden Circle should be no problem. However, Mr. Kunz voiced concern regarding signs limiting access from Eden Circle since Kunz Parts Warehouse's address is Eden Circle. He observed the potential for problems if forty foot semis enter the Richmond Hills neighborhood and have to back out because of limited access onto Eden Circle. Public Comment John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, representing the Richmond Hills neighborhood, stated the proposed plans seem reasonable. He. expressed the neighborhood's concern with the height of one building and their desire for a sit down restaurant vs. a fast food restaurant. Chairman Richards requested the Laurent/Park Developers elaborate about the restaurant proposed for the site. Chris Moran, of Laurent/Park Development, explained that the developers envisioned a restaurant on the site serving the business park. This would lessen the traffic load on local streets from employees leaving the area for lunch. Mr. Moran reported the developer has not spoken to any particular restaurant. He stated the assumption is that the restaurant will be small and not a "major" restaurant. Planner Larsen noted that Edina Code permits restaurants in the Planned Office District. He G stated the ordinance is structured so that the restaurant would serve the development, but not the general public. Planner Larsen reported that Laurent/Park would like to serve the public plus the business park in this case. When the Developer makes the request for Final Rezoning, HRA/Council may see a variance request concerning direct access to the exterior and signage. These items are the two things a restaurant serving the general public would need. Planner Larsen pointed out the developer needs to refine this request before Final Rezoning. Chairman Richards asked whether the HRA/Council would have further opportunity to review the proposed development? At the time of a future review could the HRA/Council stipulate the type of restaurant allowed in the development? Planner Larsen responded that Council could condition approval upon the type of restaurant allowed. Ed Noonan, representing the building at 5244 Eden Circle requested that consideration be given to their situation. He stated the existing 11,214 sq. ft. building has only eleven parking stalls. The building has been grandfathered to allow on street parking. Mr. Noonan also expressed concern as a parent of a child using the TAGs building with safety of the parking lot. Director Hughes informed the HRA/Council that changes from the original redevelopment plan added expense to Kunz Oil. These added costs relate to the reorientation of the site plan to improve parking distribution and access, and the location of the NURP pond on the Kunz site. The accommodation of public access and stormwater ponding on the Kunz property significantly enhances the overall redevelopment plan. The preliminary estimate for these added costs is $150,000.00. Staff considers it appropriate for the HRA to enter into agreements with Kunz Oil for reducing these additional costs. The structure of the agreement would provide for "pay as you go" tax increment financing assistance for this development. Under this method, the HRA rebates tax increments received from the development annually each year until the HRA's obligation has been repaid. If the HRA/Council agrees with this approach a redevelopment agreement and note would be provided for review at a later date. Director Hughes noted that Kunz Oil agreed to a redevelopment plan adding considerable expense to their redevelopment. He concluded that Kunz.Oil would choose not to participate in the redevelopment as proposed without assistance. Chairman Richards clarified that the Tax Increment Assistance would be funding the storm water holding pond and additional public access, but not the actual Kunz Warehouse reconstruction. Director Hughes replied affirmatively, but reminded that changes to the proposed building addition also increased the Kunz Oil redevelopment costs. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KUNZ OIL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development plan dated January 26, 1996, for Kunz Oil at 5200 Eden Circle presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 5, 1996, be and Is hereby approved subject to: 1. Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 2. Roadway /access easement, 3. Proof of Parking Agreement, 4. Watershed District Permits, and 5. Redevelopment Agreement. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall:. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Commissioner Smith Introduced the First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 -A6 as follows subject to: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 3) Roadway /access easement, 4) Watershed District Permits, and 5) Acceptable Redevelopment Agreement: ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT, POD -1 FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Office District (POD -1), is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That portion of Lot One, Block One, WANNER ADDITION, also known as 5229 Eden Circle. The extent of the Planned Industrial District (PID) is reduced by removing the property described above as the PID District." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion seconded by Commissioner Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. _ CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 31, 1996, and consisting of one page totaling $12,200.16. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director ' 44,91N�'�1�2� �o e r RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City of Edina WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to the City of Edina allowing the construction of an EMS /Fire Station at 7301 York Avenue. Adopted this 20th day of February, 1996. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, mny hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of February, 1996. %C' 0. L Debra A. Mang n, C4 Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:32 AM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------- 12838 02/20/96 $3,347.75 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP ARCH FEES 020896 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $3,347.75* 12839 02/20/96 $32.50 SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B ARCH FEES 96020743 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $32.50* $3,380.25* MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 5, 1996 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Mayor Richards. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:04 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith adopting the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOGNIZES HEROISM Chief Bemhjelm introduced Sean Hams of Minneapolis, who helped the Edina Police Department in locating and arresting a suspect in a serious assault case at the Edina Target store. Mr. Hams' actions went beyond our expectation of a normal "good citizen." In recognition of his heroic efforts Mayor Richards thanked Mr. Harris speaking for all Edina citizens and presented a plaque commending him. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1996, APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 16, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. JOINT HRA/COUNCIL REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ORDERED, PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD: PRELIMINARY REZONING PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PID TO PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT, POD -1 FIRST READING GRANTED FOR 5229 EDEN AVENUE, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRANTED, KUNZ PART PLUS WAREHOUSE, 5200 EDEN CIRCLE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file, a public hearing was conducted. Presentation by Staff /Consultant Planner Larsen reviewed the two requested actions: the Preliminary Rezoning to POD -1 for the property at 5229 Eden Avenue and Final Development Plan of Kunz Oil at 5200 Eden Circle. Laurent/Park Development requested rezoning the northerly five plus acre parcel called the "Lewis" property from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Planned Office District (POD -1). This rezoning would allow redevelopment of the property with a 94,500 sq. ft. office development. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning with four conditions: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 3) Roadway /access easement, and 4) Watershed District permits. Kunz Parts Plus Warehouse requested approval of Final Development Plan allowing expansion of their existing warehouse to approximately 37,800 sq. ft. The building and loading docks have been redesigned to accommodate truck traffic entering and exiting the site from Eden Avenue via an easement through the office development. Eden Circle has been redesigned on the easterly end to discourage cut - through traffic while maintaining a second means of egress for the Richmond Hills neighborhood and providing full access for public safety vehicles. The storm water retention pond in the southeasterly portion of the site provides most of the required storage for the Kunz site, the office development, and for the existing warehouse south of the Kunz property. The pond is a requirement of the National Urban Run -Off Program.(NURP). In addition, twenty parking stalls have been eliminated from the south parking lot to increase the amount of green area on the site. The Kunz's proposed plan requires three variances: one for parking quantity, a drive aisle setback variance along the railroad property, and a building setback variance at the northerly property line. Planner Larsen concluded that Staff recommended approval of Final Development Plan subject to: 1) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 2) Roadway /access easement, 3) Proof of Parking Agreement, 4) Watershed District permits, and 5) Redevelopment Agreement. Planner Larsen introduced Fred Hoisington of Hoisington Koegler Inc., the City's Planning Consultant for the Grandview Redevelopment Area. Mr. Hoisington reviewed the original proposal received for the Kunz and Lewis properties, then showed its evolution to the plan presently before the HRA/Council. Problems existing in the area included the Eden Avenue access was essentially a driveway through a parking lot and not a public right of way, and parking distribution. Mr. Hoisington stressed that all interested parties cooperated to achieve the plan as proposed this evening. Member Maetzold expressed concern with trucks still using Eden Circle and asked if the City could sign the area restricting truck traffic. Planner Larsen replied that he believed the City could sign the area to prevent trucks from using Eden Circle. Engineer Hoffman added that Eden Circle is a local street and the City may be as restrictive as they choose. Proponent Comment Walter Kunz, Kunz Parts Plus Warehouse, 5200 Eden Circle, stated he agreed that trucks use the new access. Mr. Kunz said that once truckers become familiar with the Kunz warehouse location, keeping trucks off Eden Circle should be no problem. However, Mr. Kunz voiced concern regarding signs limiting access from Eden Circle since Kunz Parts Warehouse's address is Eden Circle. He observed the potential for problems if forty foot semis enter the Richmond Hills neighborhood and have to back out because of limited `access onto Eden Circle. Public Comment John Menke; 5301 Pinewood Trail, representing the Richmond Hills neighborhood, stated the proposed plans seem reasonable. He expressed the neighborhood's concern with the height of one building and their desire for a sit down restaurant vs. a fast food restaurant. Mayor Richards requested the Laurent/Park Developers elaborate about the restaurant proposed for the site. Chris Moran, of Laurent/Park Development, explained that the developers envisioned a restaurant on the .site serving the business park. This would lessen the traffic load on local streets from employees leaving the area for lunch. Mr. Moran reported the developer has not spoken to any particular restaurant. He stated the assumption is that the restaurant will be small and not a "major' restaurant. Planner Larsen noted that Edina Code permits restaurants in the Planned Office District. He stated the ordinance is structured so that the restaurant would serve the development, but not the general public. Planner Larsen reported that Laurent/Park would like to serve the public plus the business park in this case. When the Developer makes the request for Final Rezoning, HRA/Council may see a variance request concerning direct access to the exterior and signage. These items are the two things a restaurant serving the general public would need. Planner Larsen pointed out the developer needs to refine this request before Final Rezoning. Mayor Richards asked whether the HRA/Council would have further opportunity to review the proposed development? At the time of a future review could the HRA/Council stipulate the type of restaurant allowed in the development? Planner Larsen responded that Council could condition approval upon the type of restaurant allowed. Ed Noonan, representing the building at 5244 Eden Circle requested that consideration be given to their situation. He stated the existing 11,214 sq. ft. building has only eleven parking stalls. The building has been grandfathered to allow on street parking. Mr. Noonan also expressed concern as a parent of a child using the TAGs building with safety of the parking lot. Assistant Manager Hughes informed the HRA/Council that changes from the original redevelopment plan added expense to Kunz Oil. These added costs relate to the reorientation of the site plan to improve parking distribution and access, and the location of the NURP pond on the Kunz site. The accommodation of public access and stomiwater ponding on the Kunz property significantly enhances the overall redevelopment plan. The preliminary estimate for these added costs is $150,000.00. Staff considers it appropriate for the HRA to enter into agreements with Kunz Oil reducing these additional costs. The structure of the agreement would provide for "pay as you go" tax increment financing assistance for this development. Under this method, the HRA rebates tax increments received from the development annually each year until the HRA's obligation has been repaid. If the HRA/Council agrees with.. this approach a redevelopment agreement and note would be provided for review at a later date. Assistant Manager Hughes noted that Kunz Oil agreed to a redevelopment plan.adding considerable expense to their. redevelopment. He_ concluded that Kunz Oil would choose not to participate in the redevelopment as proposed without assistance. Mayor Richards clarified that the Tax Increment Assistance would be funding the storm water holding pond and additional public access, but not the actual Kunz Warehouse reconstruction. Assistant Manager Hughes replied affirmatively, but reminded that changes to the proposed building addition also increased the Kunz Oil redevelopment costs., Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KUNZ OIL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development plan dated January 26, 1996 for Kunz Oil at 5200 Eden Circle presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 5, 1996, be and is hereby approved subject to: 1. Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 2. Roadway /access easement, 3. Proof of Parking Agreement, 4. Watershed District Permits, 5. Redevelopment Agreement. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly; Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced the First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 -A6 as follows subject to: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat approval of Kunz Lewis Addition, 3) Roadway /access easement, 4) Watershed District Permits, and 5) Acceptable Redevelopment Agreement: ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT, POD -1 FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: - "The extent of the Planned Office District (POD -1), is enlarged by.the addition of the following property: That portion of Lot One, Block One, WANNER ADDITION, also known as 5229 Eden Circle. The extent of the Planned Industrial District (PID) is reduced by removing the property described above from the PID District." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion seconded by Member Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD: ORDINANCE NO. 1995 -9 AMENDING CODE SECTION 850.11 SUBD. 3W ALLOWING DAY CARE AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN R -1 SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICTS: FIRST ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN, 5015 WEST 70TH STREET CONTINUED TO 2/20/96 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file, a public hearing was conducted. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated that Council first considered the amendment adding day cares, preschools and nursery schools as conditional uses in R -1 Districts at the November 20, 1995 meeting. On January 16, 1996, Council heard testimony and reviewed the required findings necessary when granting conditional use permits but continued the hearing until tonight to allow a full Council to be present. Planner Larsen reviewed the proposed amendment that would require a minimum of two acres of land. The required setbacks would be thirty feet from the front street and thirty -five feet from all other property lines. Planner Larsen .pointed out that zoning ordinance amendments require a favorable four fifths vote of the Council for passage. He mentioned that the next agenda item, Steve and Priscilla Williams request for conditional use assumes adoption of the amendment, therefore Council may want to consider waiving Second Reading of the amendment. Member Maetzold asked if the Council approved the proposed amendment, would precedent be set allowing an accessory use to become a conditional use. Planner Larsen responded that he thinks approving the amendment would not set precedent. Public Comment Bruce Markovich, 1517 Tifton Drive, expressed concern with proposed development of the streets. Mr. Markovich asked who. would pay for the street improvement, and would this development affect their neighborhood's home values. Mayor Richards observed this would be a good time to review the proposed renovation for W. 70th Street and asked Staff to respond to Mr. Markovich's questions. Mayor, Richards noted that the W. 70th Street renovation is on the agenda for action later in the meeting. Planner Larsen replied that any street improvements proposed to accommodate the day care will be the responsibility of the developer. He briefly reviewed the proposed redesign of the W. 70th Street and Metro Boulevard semaphore to provide a protected left turn access into the Especially For Children site. The existing church site's full access driveway at W. 70th Street and Rabun Drive would be eliminated and access would be imited to a right turn in, right turn out, only from the site. Engineer Hoffman explained that the W. 70th Street renovation has been broken into the following three segments: Section A. The area of W. 70th Street from the railroad track tunnel area to Metro Boulevard. This area will be remilled and overlaid with a new asphalt surface in the summer of 1996. The estimated cost is approximately $35,000.00. Section B. The Metro Boulevard and W. 70th Street intersection area including the approach lanes from the Highway 100 direction. Renovation would include updating the existing W. 70th Street/Metro Boulevard traffic signal and intersection adding a fourth leg to the intersection. The fourth leg would be the driveway from Especially for Children. Also, this section would include an additional right turn lane for westbound W. 70th Street and an additional left turn lane for access to the Especially for Children site. The City of Edina would allocate part of the cost to the Especially for Children site. Staff recommended $25,000.00 as a special assessment spread over ten years. These additions would also require right -of -way dedication by the developer. Section C. Would change the eastbound approach to the West Frontage Road and W. 70th Street intersection. The change would improve capacity and shorten the queue lengths backing up behind the signal. In addition, a traffic signal loop detector would be placed on Rabun Drive and tied to the signal controller so that traffic on Rabun Drive could call up a signal change allowing them entrance onto W. 70th Street. Minnesota Department of Transportation approval is necessary for this control scenario. Engineer Hoffman indicated that staff and the City's traffic consultant are working on this issue with Mn/DOT. This segment of work would be estimated to cost approximately $50,000 if a new controller is not required at the Frontage Road signal. Engineer Hoffman stated that W. 70th Street was last constructed in 1974 and therefore, is eligible for Minnesota State Aid funds for construction because twenty years have passed. Twenty years is the criteria for,making the street eligible for reconstruction funds. Engineer Hoffman recommend the reconstruction be authorized with the portions not paid for by the developer to be funded through Minnesota State Aid (MSA) funds for streets. Member Paulus asked if the City Engineering Department would have developed the redesign if the conditional use permit had not been requested. Engineer Hoffman stated the remilling and the overlay would have taken place. However, the rest of the redesign resulted from traffic counts and comments garnered from Council meetings where citizens voiced traffic concerns. Member Paulus asked how long before the City receives Mn /DOT approval. Engineer Hoffman replied that additional traffic counts are required for Mn /DOT, but Staff should have an answer in approximately two or three weeks regarding the signal controller. Sara Norsted, 5124 Abercrombie Drive, requested clarification of the Williams request. Ms. Norsted asked if the zoning of the site would change if the City grants the conditional use permit and if there are other approved conditional uses for this property. Mayor Richards explained that if the Williams' request for a conditional use permit is granted the property remains zoned R -1. Mayor Richards asked Planner Larsen to explain the other potential -uses in an R -1 District. Planner Larsen responded that besides single family homes and parks permitted in R -1 Districts there are a number of conditional uses that maybe granted. Those conditional uses are: schools, churches or private golf course clubhouses. The key is when the City approves conditional use only the specific use requested is approved. Any change to the development would require a new request. In addition, a private golf course would not be realistic at this location. Alan Hohenstein, 5104 W. 70th Street voiced concern with routing traffic on W. 70th Street as proposed. Left turns going onto W. 70th Street were prohibited by a 1974 law and with the proposed changes U turns would no longer be allowed at Rabun. Mr. Hohenstein stated he believes he would be required to drive a long distance because of the prohibited turning movements if he were traveling east on W. 70th and wanted to reach his home. Roy Earl, 5161 Abercrombie Drive, requested the median not be installed at Rabun Drive because he thinks it would cause problems for the residential neighborhood. Mr. Earl also agreed with Mr. Hoehenstein's comments. Member Kelly moved granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending Code Section 850.11 to permit day care facilities, pre- schools and nurseries as a conditional use in the R -1 Districts. Member Smith asked Staff to respond to the Alan Hohenstein letter regarding his concern that Edina will have numerous single family homes purchased and demolished so day care facilities can be built. In addition, Member Smith asked if hours of operation and signage on the site had been addressed. Planner Larsen replied Staff believes the amendment, the limited availability of appropriate parcels, and the findings required when granting a conditional use permit offer adequate safeguards. The economics of purchasing several single family lots, demolishing the homes and putting up a day care facility seems marginal, given the high value of Edina's single family homes. The request before Council at this time is for an operation that is open during day time hours. The site would be allowed the same signage as a church with a maximum of twenty -four square feet. Mayor Richards commented that he thought the amendment was appropriate because day care facilities, pre - schools and nurseries seem reasonable uses in an R -1 District. Mayor Richards supports the availability of day care near the child's home. He expressed his confidence in whoever sits on future Councils making valid determinations concerning conditional use requests. Member Smith expressed his agreement with Mayor Richards regarding the review process necessary when granting conditional uses. It is the responsibility of the Council to make the necessary review in conditional uses. Member Smith seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards First Reading Granted. Motion by Member Kelly to waive Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending the Zoning Ordinance allowing day care, pre- schools and nurseries as Conditional Uses in the R -1 District. Mayor Richards stated he did not support waiving Second Reading of the amendment. He recommended Council review the amendment and take action at their next meeting, February 20, 1996. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion defeated. Member Smith moved continued consideration of the Conditional Use Permit request from Steve and Priscilla Williams, Especially For Children, 5015 W. 70th Street to February 20, 1996. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 20 1996 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CITY OF EDINA PARAMEDIC /FIRE STATION (YORKTOWN PARK) Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith setting February 20, 1996, as the date for the public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit Request of the City allowing construction of the Edina Paramedic /Fire Station at Yorktown Park. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 4TH ADDITION (CENTENNIAL LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) Member Maetzold stated he would abstain from the discussion and voting .on this item because of a potential conflict of interest. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen briefly reviewed the proposed Final Plat of the Coventry at Centennial Lakes 4th Addition. This nine -unit building will be the fifth building in the Coventry townhouse project. With this plat the City will have approved for construction 37 out of the 90 total units. Planner Larsen informed Council that in this addition, the Developer is introducing some units sixteen feet wide. The proposed plat is consistent with the approved development plan. Member Kelly asked the proponent Lary Laukka to explain why some units appear to have been sold as three separate pieces. Mr. Laukka explained that occasionally the separate pieces consist of the living unit, garage and part of the "common" area owned by each unit, but are deeded separately when sold. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 4TH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 4th ADDITION ", platted by Centennial Land Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, an undivided 91.43% interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% interest, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February.5, 1996, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Member Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards Abstaining: Maetzold Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR 1996 HALF -TON 4 x 4 DODGE PICK -UP TRUCK Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for a 1996 half -ton 4 x 4 Dodge pick -up truck for the park department to McKay's Fleet Sales through Hennepin County bid #3579A5 #C at $18,783.88. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 1996 GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for 1996 gasoline and diesel fuel for Braemar Golf Course to Rollins Oil Company at $11,000.00 through Hennepin County Bid #2559135- 131,221,201. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR THREE REVERSIBLE SNOW PLOWS Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for three reversible snow plows to recommended low bidder, MacQueen Equipment at $14,035.63. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PURCHASE OF VARIOUS TRAFFIC SIGNS Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for various traffic signs held in .inventory to Lyle Signs, Inc., at $5,809.93 through Hennepin County Contract #2793A5 -232. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FERTILIZER PURCHASE FOR BRAEMAR AND NORMANDALE GOLF COURSES Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for fertilizer purchase for Braemar and Normandale Golf Courses to Turf Supply Company at $21,138.12 through Hennepin County bid. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PURCHASE OF POLICE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for purchase of police uniforms and equipment to sole bidder, Uniforms Unlimited with the amount not to exceed $25,000.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DRIVING RANGE GOLF BALLS Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith awarding the bid for purchase of driving range golf balls for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder Spalding at $14,550.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RENOVATION OF 70TH STREET FROM SOO RAILROAD TO HIGHWAY 100 PROPOSAL AUTHORIZED Mayor Richards reminded that this item had been reviewed earlier in the meeting with the Conditional Use Request of Especially For Children. Motion by Member Smith approving the proposed renovation of 70th Street as outlined by Engineer Hoffman- for Segments A, B, and C. The approval of Segment B conditioned upon favorable consideration of the conditional use permit and developer participation. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD, REQUEST TO KEEP FOUR PETS, VIVIAN YARWOOD, 4111 WEST 62ND STREET FINDINGS ADOPTED, PERMIT GRANTED Sanitarian Velde informed Council that Vivian Yarwood, 4111 West 62nd Street, submitted an application to keep four dogs at her residence. On January 26, 1996, the City sent notice to. all properties within 200 feet of the subject property advising them that the Council would consider the request at a public hearing this date. It was noted that a written objection was received from Arnold Twedt, 4246 Valley View Road, and letters in support were received from Laura and Earl Rickheim, 4112 West 62nd Street, and Robert, Becky, Joe and Jay Kidd, of 4125 West 62nd Street. Sanitarian Velde presented the Council findings of fact that the proposed permit would: 1. Not be a nuisance, and 2. Not be detrimental to the public health and safety of the applicant or other persons in the vicinity. Conclusion: 1. The procedural requirements of the Ordinance have. been met, 2. The permit may be granted as requested, 3. Conditions or restrictions applicable to this permit: All dogs must be licensed pursuant to Edina City Code Section 300. The barking of the dogs must be controlled to prevent a neighborhood nuisance. The applicant shall not replace any pets and eventually attain the limit of no more than three dogs and /or cats through attrition. 4. This permit shall be effective February 5, 1996, however, this permit shall lapse and be of no effect unless, all conditions and restrictions are observed, the applicant observes all City Ordinances applicable to the keeping of dogs and cats, and the keeping of the dogs and cats is not in violation of the Edina Zoning Ordinance which prohibits a kennel as a business in the Residential Zone. Diane Yarwood, 4111 West 62nd Street, representing her mother Vivian Yarwood the applicant, stated the dogs are well cared for. The dogs are trained, walked, and brought inside when they bark. Ms. Yarwood told Council the pets are good therapy for her mother. Mayor Richards asked for public comment on the finding to grant the permit. No comments or objections were heard. Member Paulus made a motion adopting the findings as presented and granting a permit to Vivian Yarwood to keep four dogs at 4111 West 62nd Street with conditions as stated in the findings. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA GRANT PROPOSAL UPDATE GIVEN Park Director Keprios informed the Council that the 18 member Turf/Plant Management Committee, chaired by Matt Peterson asked the University of Minnesota requesting assistance achieving their mission by means of a grant. The University responded that the opportunity exists to obtain a grant in collaboration with the Community Health Services Advisory Committee, Park Board, League of Women Voters, Board of Education, and the University of Minnesota Colleges of Education, Agriculture, Natural Resources and Landscape Arboretum, and 'the University of Minnesota Extension Service for Hennepin County. The "Collegiate Collaborative Grants Proposal" entitled, °Sustainable Urban Landscape Education Program" is designed to °provide education and explain plant health care practices, improving and enhancing the overall community's environmental quality, and landscape sustainability.0 Director Keprios noted the proposal would help accomplish the Park Department's Turf Management Plan goal of promoting and educating the public of responsible effective private lawn care practices. Also, the program encourages public use of integrated pest management practices on private properties. The grant would come as a 3/8 time graduate student intern paid by the University for one year to develop and produce educational materials and coordinate public landscape practice demonstration sites for a public education program with other University of Minnesota Colleges. In addition the City would receive in -kind support of approximately $15,000.00 from professional staff from the various University Colleges. The total grant proposal including the City of Edina's in -kind support is approximately $43,500.00. The City of Edina commitments to this Collaborative Proposal includes the following: 1) Provide printing and distribution of educational materials. (Already budgeted for 1996 as part of Turf Management Plan) 2) Provide demonstration sites within public areas and labor to help cant' -out implementation of demonstration sites. (Several appropriate sites exist in Edina with no additional staff required to set up the sites) 3) Provide office space and support staff for the 3/8 time Intem /Program Assistant. (Existing space available within Paris Department and no additional staff required) 4) Provide facilities for public educational meetings regarding effort. (Adequate space at no cost exists for public educational meetings) Staff recommends Council accept the grant proposal from the University of Minnesota as presented. Member Smith made a motion to accept the University of Minnesota Collegiate Collaborative Grants Proposal, valued at $13,500 plus an additional $15,000 through in -kind support from other University of Minnesota Colleges for further enhancing goals and objectives of Edina's Turf Management Plan entitled "Sustainable Urban Landscape Education Program." Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. UPDATE GIVEN ON PARK REFERENDA Director Keprios presented an update on the Park Bond Referenda and Senior Citizen Activities Center as directed by the Council. Director Keprios informed Council that three scenarios were developed and used to gather citizen input through several community meetings. Staff asked Council direction setting the amount of the Park Improvement Bond Issue and recommended Council approval of the $2,500,000 amount for the third sheet of. ice at Braemar. In addition, Director Keprios asked direction on the proposal received from the Senior Citizen Advisory Committee requesting an Activities Center. AMOUNT OF PARK IMPROVEMENT BOND ISSUE: On January 2, 1996, Council discussed two park- related bond referenda. The Park Board polled the community and results incorporated within the three scenarios as follows: SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 TOTAL $4,900,000 TOTAL $5,670,000 TOTAL 6,036,000 (Scenario 1 was the initial amount proposed by the Council) Park improvements and park amenities included in Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 included: multi - purpose shelter buildings, miscellaneous park amenities, restroom /picnic shelter buildings, formal gardens /amenities, park identification signs, picnic shelters, pathways, landscaping (trees - shrubs, etc.), ballfield safety fencing, parking lots /curbing and security systems. In addition to the above, Scenario 2 would include a regrading of ballfields and open areas, outdoor basketball courts, regulation size outdoor basketball courts, regulation size outdoor hockey rink and fire protection systems. Scenario 3 would include everything listed above plus adult exercise stations, batting cages, miniature outdoor hockey rinks for toddlers, skateboarding facility, tennis bangboards, wading pool in local park, and a winter tube sliding hill. Director Keprios explained that with the improvements park maintenance operating costs per year would increase for Scenario 1, $30,000 or 2.2 %; Scenario 2, $52,500 or 3.8 %; or Scenario 3, $79,500 or 5.7 %. He indicated that no additional full -time staff would be required. Comments from the Council discussion were: the wish list continues to grow with good ideas, but the budget must be kept in line with regards to annual maintenance; perceptions are reality; initially the reason for the bond issue was to bring parks into code compliance; favorable financing exists now that may not be available for twenty years; the City does not spend for the sake of spending; residents have not intimated these are wild and crazy schemes - this is an investment in our community to keep pace with the times; the public input has been taken, how can we not take their suggestions; recollection of a fighting airplane "making" a park; selling the proposal on programming could kill it; and, historically, people vote their pocketbook. Member Kelly made a motion setting the final bond principal at $5,500,000 for the Park Improvement Bond Referenda. Member Smith seconded the motion. Mayor Richards amended the motion setting the final bond principal at $5,670,000 for the Park Improvement Bond Referenda as suggested by Scenario 2. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Maetzold, Richards Nays: Kelly, Paulus, Smith Motion defeated. Member Maetzold reminded Council the $4,900,000 was a starting point. After canvassing constituents, additional improvements suggested brought the figure to $5,670,000 (Scenario 2). Member Kelly amended the first motion setting the Park'Improvement Bond Referenda at $5,500,000 With language added of not to exceed $5,500,000. Member Smith seconded the amended motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Maetzold Motion carried. INDOOR ICE SHEET - BRAEMAR ARENA: Staff recommended the proposed indoor ice sheet for Braemar Arena at $2,500,000, be a separate issue on the ballot May 7, 1996. Member Smith made a motion setting the limit on the ballot not to exceed $2,500,000 for the third indoor ice sheet at Braemar Arena on the May 7, 1996, Park Board Referenda. Motion seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. SENIOR CITIZEN ACTIVITY CENTER: City staff and Southdale YMCA staff met recently to consider the feasibility of a joint venture adding a Senior Activity Center to the proposed Southdale YMCA's expansion. Manager Rosland said the proposal has real merit. Transportation remains an issue in Edina but it is possible an option exists within the Regional Transit Board to opt out, thereby freeing up funds for interior transportation. Manager Rosland explained Staff would research opting out. Lila Larson, Senior Advisory Council, said a joint venture with the "Y" could have many uses with Edina's aging population. She voiced concern about the loss of control if private money were to be used for the Center. Member Smith commented the proposed joint venture between the "Y° and City for the Senior Activity Center has merit and Ms. Larson's comments should be considered. Member Maetzold believes this proposal is on the right track but critical issues remain with both staying an independent entity, and transportation to the site. Member Paulus reiterated that the Senior Advisory Council should be kept apprised of the date(s) the issue would be back before the Council. Member Smith made a motion directing Staff to continue talks with the Southdale YMCA investigating the feasibility of a Senior Activities. Center being incorporated into the YMCA's proposed building expansion. Motion seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. 1996 BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES ROSTER DISCUSSED Mayor Richards noted that many boardstcommissions and committee members with expiring terms have agreed to be reappointed. However, some vacancies exist on the boards / commissions /committees. Mayor Richards encouraged the Council to submit names to him of persons interested in serving. No formal action was required. "SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING DATE SET - MAY 8,1996.5:00 P.M. TO CANVASS ELECTION RETURNS FROM PARK REFERENDA SPECIAL ELECTION MAY 7, 1996 Motion made by Member.Maetzold and was seconded by Member Smith setting May 8,1996,5:00 P.M. for Special Council Meeting to canvass election returns of Park Referenda Special Election of May 7, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. "HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 20, 1996, FOR VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith setting February 20, 1996, as hearing date for vacation of utility and drainage easement for the Coventry at Centennial Lakes Second Addition. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith appointing Lowell McCarthy as Assistant Weed Inspector for the City of Edina for 1996. Motion carved on rollcall vote - four ayes. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Manager Rosland informed Council he received information from the Minnesota Coalition for a Smoke Free Society 2000 regarding a youth access tobacco bill authored by Representative Loren Jennings. Representative Jennings' bill limits the ability of cities to pass ordinances more restrictive than statutes. Any comments on the bill must be to legislators by February 6, 1996. After a brief discussion, Council consensus was that legislators be encouraged to support a tobacco licensing bill yet still preserve the strong tradition of local control. Member Paulus made a motion supporting the "No Preemption" bill that preserves local power and to notify legislators of this support. Motion seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. SALE OF G O TAXABLE TIP REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1996A APPROVED Manager Rosland informed Council the City received nine bids on the $11,175,000 Taxable General Obligation Bonds today. Bids were stronger than previously estimated. The bid of Cronin and Company and Smith Barney was the most favorable at 6.22% for bonds maturing from 1997 through 2009. The low bidders' proposals will allow the City to realize savings of $1,778,377 in debt service. Springsted, the City's Public Financial Advisor, recommended the City award the bonds to the banking syndicate of Cronin and Company and Smith Barney. Moody's Investors Services and Standard and Poors Inc., awarded bond ratings of A4-1 and AA respectively. Moody's considered upgrading the bonds to AAA, their highest rating, but the committee decided to withhold any upgrade at this time, subject to further development within the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and the stabilization of commercial property values. Springsted further recommended the City consider the following: 1) Both Moody's and Standard and Poors be scheduled for an on -site visit in the spring, and 2) Periodic or quarterly communications should be-made with both agencies to increase the flow of information related to city operations and new development. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $11,250,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1996A; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. The City has presently outstanding its General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988, initially dated as of October 1, 1988 (the 1988 Bonds), and its General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989, initially dated as of April 1, 1989 (the 1989 Bonds). This Council hereby authorizes the sale of $11,250,000 Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1996A (the Bonds), of the City, the proceeds of which would be used, together with any additional funds of the City which might be required, to refund in advance of maturity the 1988 Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2009, which aggregate $4,925,000 in principal amount (the 1988 Refunded Bonds), and to refund in advance of maturity the 1989 Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2009, which aggregate $5,125,000 in principal amount (the 1989 Refunded Bonds) (the 1988 Refunded Bonds and the 1989 Refunded Bonds are herein collectively referred to as the Refunded Bonds). . 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The interest on the Bonds will not be excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2, paragraph (6), the requirements as to public sale do not apply to the issuance of the Bonds. Proposals- have been received for the sale of the Bonds, and the Council has publicly considered all proposals presented in conformity with the terms and conditions distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The most favorable of such proposals is ascertained to be that of Cronin & Company, and associates, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $11,137,500 plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and payment, on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 1.03 Award of Bonds. The sale of the Bonds is hereby awarded to the Purchaser and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds in accordance with the terms of the bid. The good faith deposit of the Purchaser shall be retained and deposited by the City until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. The good faith checks of other persons who submitted proposals to purchase the Bonds shall be returned to them forthwith. 1.04. Savings. It is hereby determined that by issuance of the Bonds the City will realize a substantial interest rate reduction, a gross savings of approximately. $1,778,377 and a present value savings (using the yield on the Bonds, computed in accordance with Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as the discount factor) of approximately $1,515,918. 1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts; conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for the Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 1996A Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP March 1, 1996 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above computed on the basis of the number of days elapsed in a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1996, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the Finance Director in Edina, Minnesota, as Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the "Bond Registrar"), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of the City or the Bond Registrar if a successor to the City Finance Director as Bond Registrar has been designated under the Resolution described herein. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $11,250,000 (the "Bonds "), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution adopted ,by the City Council on February 5, 1996 (the "Resolution ") to refund certain of the City's outstanding tax increment bonds, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are payable primarily from tax increments to be derived from a tax increment financing district established by the City and from tax increment financing districts established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the "Districts;') which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have not been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2005 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 2006 through 2009 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and by lot, assigned in proportion to their principal amount, within any maturity, on February 1, 2005 and on any date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial. redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, _COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts; conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to.make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has pledged and appropriated to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds tax increments to be derived by the City from the Districts; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. by manual signature of the Bond Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no longer acting as Bond Registrar, by one of the authorized representatives of the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Date of Authentication: CITY OF EDINA City Manager Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. By City Finance Director, as Bond Registrar The-following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM — as tenants UNIF TRANS MIN ACT .......... Custodian .......... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to JT TEN — as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act .................... ............................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medallion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the faceof the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1996A". The Bonds shall be in the aggregate principal amount of $11,250,000 and shall be, issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest computed on the basis of the number of days elapsed in a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -lays months from date of original issue until paid or duly'called for redemption at the rates per annum.shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1999 $500,000 5.85% 2005 a 900,000 6.10% 2000 625,000 5.85 2006 1,000,000 6.10 2001 650,000 5:85 2007 1,475,000 6.15 2002 700,000 5.85 2008 1,800,000 6.20 2003 800,000 5.85 2009 1,900,000 6.25 2004 900,000 6.00 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 3.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall bear a date of original issue of March 1, 1996, and shall be dated as of the date of authentication. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1996, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. . (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner.thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints the City Finance Director, as the initial Registrar. In the event that the City determines to discontinue the book entry-only system for the Bonds as described in paragraph (c) of Section 3.07, or DTC, as defined in Section 3.07, determines to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds and a new securities depository is not appointed for the Bonds, the City will designate a suitable bank or trust company to act as successor Registrar if the City Finance Director is then acting as Registrar. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. 3.05. -Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2005 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2006 through 2009 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 2005 and on any date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption., At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Clerk shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect'the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The. Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of the Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no longer acting as Registrar, an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds, need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Finance Director to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 3.07. Securities Depository. (a) For purposes of this Section the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person's subrogee. "Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds. "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, New York. "Participant' shall mean any broker - dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository. "Representation Letter" shall mean the Representation Letter from the City and the Registrar to DTC with respect to the Bonds, substantially in the form presented to the Council with the Resolution. (b) The Bonds shall be initially issued as separately authenticated fully registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds shall be registered in the bond register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Registrar and the City may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, if any, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owners of Bonds under this resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and for all other purposes whatsoever; and neither the Registrar nor the City shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Neither the Registrar nor the City shall have any responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or any Participant, or any other person which is not shown on the bond register as being a registered owner of any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant, with respect to the payment by DTC or any Participant of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this resolution, with respect to the selection by DTC or any Participant of any person to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with respect to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. So long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on such Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to such Bond, only to Cede & Co. in accordance with the Representation Letter, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity evidencing the obligation of the City to make payments of principal and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to such new nominee in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof. (c) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds in the form of bond certificates, the City may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Bonds in the form of certificates. In such event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and the Registrar and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof. (d) The execution and delivery of the Representation Letter to DTC by the Mayor, is hereby authorized, and execution of the Representation Letter by the Mayor shall be conclusive evidence of approval by the Mayor of the form and terms thereof. The Representation Letter shall set forth certain matters with respect to, among other things, notices, consents and approvals by registered owners of the Bonds and Beneficial Owners and payments on the Bonds. The Registrar shall have the same rights with respect to its actions thereunder as it has with respect to its actions under this resolution. . (e) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted under paragraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. In the event Bonds in the form of certificates are issued to owners other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as owner of all the Bonds, or another securities depository as owner of all the Bonds, the provisions of this resolution shall also apply to all matters relating thereto, including, without limitation, the printing of such Bonds in the form of bond certificates and the method of payment of principal of and interest on such Bonds in the form of bond certificates. Section 4. Use of Proceeds and Security Provisions. 4.01. Use of Proceeds and Escrow Account. The proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of $11,035,889.09, are irrevocably appropriated for the payment of the principal and interest due on the Refunded Bonds to and including February 1, 1998 and to pay and redeem on February 1, 1998 the Refunded Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 1999. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed, simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds, to deposit the proceeds thereof, to the extent described above, in escrow with First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the Escrow Agent), a banking institution whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and whose combined capital and surplus is not less than $500,000, and shall invest the funds so deposited in securities authorized for such purpose by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subdivision 8, maturing on such dates and bearing interest at such rates as are required to provide funds sufficient, with cash retained in the escrow account, to make the above - described payments. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to enter into an Escrow Agreement with the Escrow Agent establishing the terms and conditions for the escrow account in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67. Of the remaining proceeds of the Bonds, $63,132.06 shall be applied to pay issuance expenses, and $38,478.85, together with any accrued interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund created pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. 4.02. Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate Series 1996A Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bond Sinking Fund (the Sinking Fund) which shall be created and maintained on the books of the City as a separate debt redemption fund until the Bonds, and all interest thereon, are fully paid. There shall be credited to the Sinking Fund the following: (a) Any amount initially deposited therein pursuant to Section 4.01 hereof. (b) All taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the tax increments herein pledged and appropriated to the Sinking Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Bonds. (c) Any other funds appropriated by the Council for the payment of the Bonds. 4.03. Tax Increment Financing District. The City hereby irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increments derived from the tax increment financing districts of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the HRA), designated by Hennepin County as Nos. 1203 (Centennial Lakes and Southeast Edina-Edin borough Tax Increment Financing Districts) and 1200 (50th and France Redevelopment) and tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district of the City designated by Hennepin County as No. 1204 (Southdale Tax Increment Financing District), which are either paid to the City (in the case of the tax increment financing district established by the City) or received by the Issuer from the HRA to. pay the Bonds (in the case of the tax increment financing districts established by the HRA). Such tax increments shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City or the HRA from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the tax increments herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds for the payment of other obligations of the City or HRA or to pay costs eligible to be paid from the tax increments herein pledged. 4.04. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the. Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds and all other obligations of the City payable from tax increments from the Districts as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. 4.05. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Sinking Fund. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond called for redemption on any date when it is prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; provided that notice of the redemption thereof has been duly given as provided in Section 3.05. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 6. Registration Certification of Proceedings and Official Statement. 6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on upon the Auditor's register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney P.L.L.P., Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated January 22, 1996 (the Official Statement), prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Springsted Incorporated, is hereby approved. Springsted Incorporated, is hereby authorized of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby. authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 7. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The City calls for redemption on February l,"1998 all of the Refunded Bonds which mature on or after February 1, 1999. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized to take all steps necessary to redeem the Refunded Bonds on such dates. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 8, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce .performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 8, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent penrnitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 8, "Owner" or "Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any "Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, `Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (1) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding ".means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (1) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been canceled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 5 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 1996 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Most recent population.estimate; City Property Values; City Indebtedness; City Tax Rates; Levies and Collections; Funds on Hand; Major Employers in the City; City Issued Building Permits; Labor Force Data; and Current General Fund Budget. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 8 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (H) Bond calls; (1) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property_securing repayment of the securities; and .(K) Rating changes. As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is also an event that would be deemed "material' for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any "explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any.change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) to the following entities by telecopy, overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate: (1) the information described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b), to each then nationally recognized municipal securities information repository under the Rule and to any state information depository then designated or operated by the State of Minnesota as contemplated by the Rule (the "State Depository"), if any; (2) the information described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b), to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to the State Depository, if any; and (3) the information described in subsection (b), to any rating agency then maintaining .a rating of the Bonds and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of transmission under paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection (c), as the case may be, or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information is to be released. (d) Term: Amendments: Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 8 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 8 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 8 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 8 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (1) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (1)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of'financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 8 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 9. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. Section 10. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Member Kelly second the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID Member Smith made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 31, 1996 and consisting of 42 pages: General Fund $487,299.69; C.D.B.G. $9,119.50; Communications $36,290.40; Working Capital $12,461.29; Art Center $9,085.39; Golf Course Fund $45,048.38; Ice Arena Fund $12,229.76; Gun Range Fund $484.71; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $24,474.27; Utility Fund $347,975.42; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $355.91; Recycling Program $11.66; Liquor Dispensary Fund $97,439.60; Construction Fund $614.94; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $24,736.67; TOTAL $1,107,627.59. Motion seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards adjourned the meeting at 9:55 P.M. City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # II_A. FROM: Kris Aaker ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: February 20, 1996 Q To Council SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1995 -9 Action ❑ Motion Amendment to Zoning Ordinance to allow day ❑ Resolution care, preschools, and nurseries as ❑x Ordinance Conditional Uses in the R -1 District. ❑ Discussion Recommendation: At the February 5, 1996, Council meeting, the Council heard and approved first reading of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 to allow day care, preschools, and nurseries as Conditional Uses in the R -1 District. Information /Background: See attached City Council minutes and proposed amendments. note would be provided for review at a later date. Assistant Manager Hughes noted that Kunz Oil agreed to a redevelopment plan adding considerable expense to their redevelopment. He concluded that Kunz Oil would choose not to participate in the redevelopment as proposed without assistance. Mayor Ri rds clarified that the Tax Increment Assistance would be funding the storm wat holding pond and addition I public access, but not the actual Kunz Warehouse reconstruction. Assistan anager Hughes replied affirm *vely, but reminded that changes to the proposed building addition als creased the Kunz Oil redevelopm t costs. Member Smith int duced the following resolution and moved its adop ' SOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPME PLAN FOR THE KUNZ OIL REDEVELOPMENT N BE IT RESOLVED by the ity Council of the City of Edina, Minnesot , that the Final Development plan dated January 26, 1996 for unz Oil at 520/aed d at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 5, 1996, a and is h to: 1. Final Plat approval Kunz Le 2. Roadway /access easement, 3. Proof of Parking Agreement, 4. Watershed District Permits 5. Redevelopment Agreemeni�. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, R Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced the First R94ding of O Rezoning, 2) Final Plat approval of K z Lewis Add District Permits, and 5) Acceptabl Redevelopme ice No. 850 -A6 as follows subject to: 1) Final 3) Roadway /access easement, 4) Watershed ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A6 A/RDNA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY OPERTY TO PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT, POD -1 M PLAN NED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCI OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sub of Section 850 of_the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of ffice District (POD -1), is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That p The ex above froi Motion of Lot One, Block One, WANNER ADDITION, also known as 5229 Eden Circle. f the Planned Industrial District (PID) is reduced by removing the property described PID District." This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its.passage and publication. :d by Member Maetzold. all: : Kelly, Maetzold, Reading granted. Paulus, Smith, Richards (�^ `,,PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD: ORDINANCE NO 1995 -9 AMENDING CODE SECTION 850.11 SUED. 3(A) v *ALLOWING DAY CARE AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN R -1 SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICTS, FIRST READING GRANTED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST STEVEN & PATRICIA WILLIAMS, ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN, 5015 WEST 70TH STREET CONTINUED TO 2/20196 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file, a public hearing was conducted. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated that Council first considered the amendment adding day cares, preschools and nursery schools as conditional uses in R -1 Districts at the November 20, 1995 meeting. On January 16, 1996, Council heard testimony and reviewed the required findings necessary when granting conditional use permits but continued the hearing until tonight to allow a full Council to be present. Planner Larsen reviewed the proposed amendment that would require a minimum of two acres of land. The required setbacks would be thirty feet from the front street and thirty-five feet from all other property lines. Planner Larsen pointed out that zoning ordinance amendments require a favorable four fifths vote of the Council for passage. He mentioned that the next agenda item, Steve and Priscilla Williams request for conditional use assumes adoption of the amendment, therefore Council may want to consider waiving Second Reading of the amendment. Member Maetzold asked if the Council approved the proposed amendment, would precedent be set allowing an accessory use to become a conditional use. Planner Larsen responded that he thinks approving the amendment would not set precedent. Public Comment Bruce Markovich, 1517 Tifton Drive, expressed concern with proposed development of the streets. Mr. Markovich asked who would pay for the street improvement, and would this development affect their neighborhood's home values. Mayor Richards observed this would be a good time to review the proposed renovation for W. 70th Street and asked Staff to respond to Mr. Markovich's questions. Mayor Richards noted that the W. 70th Street renovation is on the agenda for action later in the meeting. Planner Larsen replied that any street improvements proposed to accommodate the day care will be the responsibility of the developer. He briefly reviewed the proposed redesign of the W. 70th Street and Metro Boulevard semaphore to provide a protected left turn access into the Especially For Children site. The existing church site's full access driveway at W. 70th Street and Rabun Drive would be eliminated and access would be imited to a right turn in, right turn out, only from the site. Engineer Hoffman explained that the W. 70th Street renovation has been broken into the following three segments: Section A. The area'of W. 70th Street from the railroad track tunnel area to Metro Boulevard. This area will be remilled and overlaid with a new asphalt surface in the summer of 1996. The estimated cost is approximately $35,000.00. Section B. The Metro Boulevard and W. 70th Street intersection area including the approach lanes from the Highway 100 direction. Renovation would include updating the existing W. 70th Street/Metro Boulevard traffic signal and intersection adding a fourth leg to the intersection. The fourth leg would be the driveway from Especially for Children. Also, this section would include an additional right turn lane for westbound W. 70th Street and an additional left turn lane for access to the Especially for Children site. The City of Edina would allocate part of the cost to the Especially for Children site. Staff recommended $25,000.00 as a special assessment spread over ten years. These additions would also require right -of -way dedication by the developer. Section C. Would change the eastbound approach to the West Frontage Road and W. 70th Street intersection. The change would improve capacity and shorten the queue lengths backing up behind the signal. In addition, a traffic signal loop detector would be placed on Rabun Drive and tied to the signal controller so that traffic on Rabun Drive could call up a signal change allowing them entrance onto W. 70th Street. Minnesota Department of Transportation approval is necessary for this control scenario. Engineer Hoffman indicated that staff and the City's traffic consultant are working on this issue with MNDOT. This segment of work would be estimated to cost approximately $50,000 if a new controller is not required at the Frontage Road signal. Engineer Hoffman stated that W. 70th Street was last constructed in 1974 and therefore, is eligible for Minnesota State Aid funds for construction because twenty years have passed. Twenty years is the criteria for making the street eligible for reconstruction funds. Engineer Hoffman recommend the reconstruction be authorized with the portions not paid for by the developer to be funded through Minnesota State Aid (MSA) funds for streets. Member Paulus asked if the City Engineering Department would have developed the redesign if the conditional use permit had not been requested. Engineer Hoffman stated the remilling and the overlay would have taken place. However, the rest of the redesign resulted from traffic counts and comments garnered from Council meetings where citizens voiced traffic concerns. Member Paulus asked how long before the City receives Mn /DOT approval. Engineer Hoffman replied that additional traffic counts are required for Mn /DOT, but Staff should have an answer in approximately two or three weeks regarding the signal controller. Sara Norsted, 5124 Abercrombie Drive, requested clarification of the Williams request. Ms. Norsted asked if the zoning of the site would change if the City grants the conditional use permit and if there are other approved conditional uses for this property. Mayor Richards explained that if the Williams' request for a conditional use permit is granted the property remains zoned R -1. Mayor Richards asked Planner Larsen to explain the other potential uses in an R -1 District. Planner Larsen responded that besides single family homes and parks permitted in R -1 Districts there are a number of conditional uses that may be granted. Those conditional uses are: schools, churches or private golf course clubhouses. The key is when the City approves conditional use only the specific use requested 'is approved. Any change to the development would require a new request. In addition, a private golf course would not be realistic at this location. Alan Hohenstein, 5104 W. 70th Street voiced concern with routing traffic on W. 70th Street as proposed. Left turns going onto W. 70th Street were prohibited by a 1974 law and with the proposed changes U tums would no longer be allowed at Rabun. Mr. Hohenstein stated he believes he would be required to drive a long distance because of the prohibited turning movements if he were traveling east on W. 70th and wanted to reach his home. Roy Earl, 5161 Abercrombie Drive, requested the median not be installed at Rabun Drive because he thinks it would cause problems for the residential neighborhood. Mr. Earl also agreed with Mr. Hoehenstein's comments. Member Kelly moved granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending Code Section 850.11 to permit day care facilities, pre- schools and nurseries as a conditional use in the R -1 Districts. Member Smith asked Staff to respond to the Alan Hohenstein letter regarding his concern that Edina will have numerous single family homes purchased and demolished so day care facilities can be built. In addition, Member Smith asked if hours of operation and signage on the site had been addressed. Planner Larsen replied Staff believes the amendment, the limited availability of appropriate parcels, and the findings required when granting a conditional use permit offer adequate safeguards. The economics of purchasing several single family lots, demolishing the homes and putting up a day care facility seems marginal, given the high value of Edina's single family homes. The request before Council at this time is for an operation that is open during day time hours. The site would be allowed the same signage as a church with a maximum of twenty -four square feet. Mayor Richards commented that he thought the amendment was appropriate because day care facilities, pre - schools and nurseries seem reasonable uses in an R -1 District. Mayor Richards supports the availability of day care near the child's home. He expressed his confidence in whoever sits on future Councils making valid determinations concerning conditional use requests. Member Smith expressed his agreement with Mayor Richards regarding the review process necessary when granting conditional uses. It is the responsibility of the Council to make the necessary review in conditional uses. Member Smith seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards First Reading Granted. Motion by Member.Kelly to waive Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending the Zoning Ordinance allowing day care, pre- schools and nurseries as Conditional Uses in the R -1 District. . Mayor Richards stated he did not support waiving Second Reading of the amendment. He recommended Council review the amendment and take action at their next meeting, February 20, 1996. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion defeated. Member Smith moved continued consideration of the Conditional Use Permit request from Steve and Priscilla Williams, Especially For Children, 5015 W. 70th Street to February 20, 1996. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 20 1996 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CITY OF EDINA PA MEDIC /FIRE STATION YORKTOWN PARK Motion made by Member Maetzoid and seconded by Me ber Smith setting February 20, 1996, as the d to for the public hearing for the Conditional Use Pe Request of the City allowing construction 9f the Edina Paramedic /Fire Station at Yorktown Park. Motion carried on roll II vote - four ayes. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FO HE COVENTRY AT CENTE LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) ember Maetzold stated he on this item because of a potentia onflict of interest. Id abstain from the discussion and voting Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen briefly reviewed the prop sed Final PI of the Coventry at Centennial Lakes 4th Addition. This nine -unit building will be the fifth buildin in the CWentry townhouse project. With this plat the City will have approved for construction 37 out of th 90 to I units. Planner Larsen informed Council that in this addition, the Developer is introducing some its ixteen feet wide. The proposed plat is consistent with the approved development plan. Member Kelly asked the proponent Lary La kka t explain why some units'appear to have been sold as three separate pieces. Mr. Laukka explained at occa 'onally the separate pieces consist of the living unit, garage and part of the "common" area ow ed by each nit, but are deeded separately when sold. Member Smith intr/Councii-on the follow' g resolution an moved its adoption: RES UTION APPROVIN FINAL PLAT FE CO TRY AT CENTENNIA LAKES 4TH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED bCity C ncil of the City of Edina, innesota, that that certain plat entitled, "THE COVENTRY NTE IAL LAKES 4th ADDITIO ", platted by Centennial Land Limited Partnership, a Minlim' ed partnership, an undivided .43% interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% st and the Housing and Redevelop nt Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corpo politic under the laws of the State Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of tCouncii-on February 5, 1996, be and is ereby granted final plat approval. Member Smith secohe motion. Ayes: Kelly, Pamith, Richards Abstaining: MaeResolution adop *BID AWARDEDIFOR 1996 HALF -TON 4 x 4 DODGE PICK -UP TRUCK Motion made by Member Maetzold ands conded by Member Smith awarding the bid for a 1996 half -ton 4 x 4 Dodge pick -up truck for the park department to McKay's Fleet Sales through Hennepin County bid 93579A5 #C at $18,783.88. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Motion carved. DISTRIC 9 EDEN AVENUE CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 5.A%6 Affidavits of Notice were presented, appro. and ordered placed on file. Mayor Pro Tem. Kell plained that Laurent Development requested continuan of this item to the FebruX56 meeting. Member Maetzold moved Member Smith n continuing the public hearing for the Preliminary Rezoning fro ID, Planned I POD -1, Planned Office District, for 5229 Eden Avenue until the Feb 5, 1996 Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Ke Motion carried. TO FEBRUARY 5. 1996 Affidavits of No ,lore were pre ted, approved and ordered placed on file. Mayor Pro Tern Kelly reported that Walter Ku quested contin ce of this item to the February 5, 1996 Council meeting. Member Maetzold moved an ember Smith seconded the mot continuing the public hearing for the Final Development PI unz Parts Plus Warehouse, 5200 Eden . cle until the February 5, 1996 Council meeting. Ayes: Maetzold, P us, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON ORDINANCE NO. 1995 -9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION 850.11 SUBD (A) ALLOWING DAY CARE AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN AN R -1 SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICT: CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 5, 1996 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen noted the Council first considered the amendment adding day cares, preschools and nursery schools as Conditional Uses in the R -1 Districts at its November 20, 1995 meeting. The Council continued the hearing to this date allowing Staff time to provide information on the impact of the proposal and deliver Ordinance Findings as required by Edina's Code when approving Conditional Use Permits. Planner Larsen reviewed a map depicting properties zoned R -1 of two or more acres. Two acres is the proposed lot size minimum for day care as the principal use. The map also identified existing churches with lots of two or more acres. Planner Larsen pointed out many existing churches currently contain day care facilities as an accessory use. The City permits this accessory use under the present Edina Code. Planner Larsen reviewed Edina Code's Section 850.04 Subd 4. E. seven requirements for findings when granting a conditional use permit. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a three - fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the seven requirements even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. Planner Larsen recommended Council consider approving the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Staff believes because of -the limited number of properties available for this purpose, the economics of the business, and findings necessary for a particular proposal, adequate safeguards exist to prevent this type of business from occurring where it does not belong. Planner Larsen mentioned Steve and Priscilla Williams submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow day care at 5015 West 70th Street. In addition, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit dependent on adoption of the amendment by the City Council. Member Smith questioned what would prevent someone from buying at least two acres of land and constructing a day care facility. Planner Larsen responded that while nothing would prevent the acquisition of the property the Council can judge each particular circumstance and decide whether the requested conditional use was appropriate within the neighborhood. Member Smith expressed concern that the amendment did not contain language preventing residential demolition for rebuilding as a day care facility. Planner Larsen replied that he did not believe we could contrive language to obtain the necessary guarantee in an ordinance amendment unless the Council created a separate day care zoning district. Planner Larsen stated his belief that the findings necessary in granting a conditional use would offer the protection necessary to protect the residential integrity of neighborhoods. Attorney Gilligan stated that zoning requires uniformity throughout the City and without creating a separate zoning district there appears no way to guarantee that uniformity. He continued that he has not looked into adding language to the amendment creating a separate district or prohibiting acquisition and demolition with the intent to create a day care facility. Member Maetzold asked if adopting the ordinance amendment and resultant conditional use permits, sets precedent for future problems. For example, a for profit pediatric clinic seeking relocation within an R -1 District approaches the City. Could we deny their request? Attorney Gilligan replied that Edina's Code allows churches and schools in R -1 Districts. The Zoning Ordinance looks at what type of uses are permitted in a zoning district. Day cares would be consistent with uses allowed in R -1 Districts, but a medical facility would be inconsistent with allowed uses in R -1 Districts. Public Comment Alan Hohenstein, 5104 West 70th Street. Mr. Hohenstein stated he addressed this issue at previous meetings and in his January 11, 1996 letter. Mr. Hohenstein repeated his objections to the proposed ordinance amendments. He commented this amendment was a major change in the zoning ordinance affecting everyone in the City and that he thinks the City has no compelling reason to change the zoning. In addition, the former church had its opportunity for compensation when the State of Minnesota took part of the property to expand Highway 100. Mary Johanson, Director of Especially For Children Day Care Center. Ms. Johanson stated that in her understanding if the subject property were still a church there would be no issue since day cares are a permitted accessory use for church sites. Ms. Johanson added that the center is currently full and they have a long waiting list of Edina residents. She explained that many laws and regulations exist to prevent day cares from operating in an inappropriate area. Ms. Johanson urged the Council to adopt the ordinance amendment and subsequent conditional use permit. Member Smith asked for clarification regarding condemnation of whether or not the compensation paid is for the property taken. The property remaining does in fact have value for which the entity taking property did not compensate the owner. In addition, Member Smith asked if Staff knew with certainty what regulations exist to control the location of day care facilities. Attorney Gilligan responded affirmatively that compensation in condemnation is for the land taken. He replied that he was not familiar enough with day care regulations to be certain of the ability to deny placing a facility in a residential neighborhood. Member Paulus advised that discussion focus on the ordinance amendment and not the request for a conditional use permit. on 70th Street. After reviewing the seven required findings for conditional use permits, Member Paulus believes they offer safeguards. In addition, Member Paulus pointed out that the economic feasibility of a day care facility acquiring enough property, taking down the homes and constructing a day care offers another safeguard. She thinks enough safeguards exist when viewing the overall Ordinance and the required findings necessary for granting a conditional use. Member Maetzold stated he had some reservations of the potential for interjecting a business into an R -1 neighborhood, but supports the amendment. He believes there are enough safeguards in the Code to control the location of day care facilities. Mayor Pro Tern Kelly reminded Council that Edina's Code currently allows home day care facilities in residential neighborhoods. Mr. Hohenstein submitted that if the Council adopts the proposed amendment, an applicant could tear down property and construct a facility that would differ greatly from churches where day cares are allowed as accessory uses. Also regarding condemnation awards in his experience compensation covers future use or loss of future use. Member Smith moved to continue consideration of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending Code Section 850.11 Subd 3(a) allowing day care as a conditional use in an R -1 Single Dwelling District until February 5,'i996 and directing staff to revise the proposed amendment. Motion - defeated for lack of a second. Member Paulus moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending Code Section 850.11 Subd 3(a) allowing day care as a conditional use in an R -1 Single Dwelling District until February 5, 1996. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Assistant Manager Hughes stated that since this is a final reading of a zoning ordinance state law requires that the ordinance receive four affirmative votes. Member Paulus withdrew her previous motion because of the need for the four fifths vote. Mayor Pro Tern Kelly stated support of continuing action until February 5, 1996 Member Paulus moved to continue consideration of Ordinance No. 1995 -9 amending Code Section 850.11 Subd 3(a) allowing day care as a conditional use in an R -1 Single Dwelling District until February 5, 1996. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. 'LOT DIVISION GRANTED - 1 OVERHOLT PASS AND 6725 IROQUOIS CIRCLA Motion made by Member. Smith and seconded by Member Mpdtzold adopting the following re lution: RESOLUTIO PPROVING LOT DIVISION WHEREAS, the following described perties are two separate tracts ;f land: DASBURG PROPERTY: All of Outlot B, OVERHOLT HI GEORGIA 2ND ADDITION, E ept that part thereof lying easterly of the following desc ' d line: Commencing at the so east comer of Lot 1, Block 2, said Addition; thence north y along the easterly line of s Lot 1 to the northeast comer of said Lot 1; thence northe along the northerly prolongat' n of the easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 100.00 fe , thence northeasterly to the st westerly corner of Lot 4, Block 1, OVERHOLT HILLS S LY ADDITION, and there to ating; and HITCHCOC/PRER R That past northerly 60 feet of Lot 1 Auditors Subdivision No. 196, Hennepin Countylying easterly of the sout rly extension of the westerly line of East Iroquois shown on the plat of IROQ SHILL, AND That pa, Auditors Subdivision No. 6, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the plHOLT HILLS SALLY A TION and lying northerly of a line drawn parallel with and outherly from the nor ine of said Lot 13, according to the plat thereof on file or o n the office of the R istrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEOEAS, the owners have requegod the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as folio . DASBURG PROPERTY: Draft minutes P.C. meeting of November 1, 1995 Amendment to Steve and Priscilla Williams Zoning Ordinance Especially for Children 5015 West 70th Street Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council heard the rezoning request by Mr. Steve Williams/ Especially for Children at their October 16, 1995, meeting, and recommended that day care be considered as a Conditional Use- in the R- 1 zoning district. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would provide standards for day care as a Conditional Use. Mr. Larsen reported that Mr. Williams has not applied for a Conditional Use Permit at this time. Mr. Larsen informed Commission members the discussion this evening will only focus on the proposed amendment to the ordinance allowing day care as a Conditional Use in the R -1 zoning district. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if he is aware of any day care facilities operating out of the R -1 district. Mr. Larsen explained day care is permitted as an accessory use in churches, and schools, and presently there are day care facilities operating out of many of them, but not as the principal use. Mr. Larsen reported day care is allowed as an home occupation in residential dwelling units, and city ordinance limits the number of children to 12. A brief discussion ensued with the Commission in agreement that the proposed amendment to the ordinance should be adopted to allow day care as a Conditional Use. Commissioner Faust moved to recommend adoption of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow day care as a Conditional Use in the R -1 district. Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1995 -9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT DAY CARE FACILITIES, PRE - SCHOOLS AND NURSERIES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE R -1 DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended by adding a new paragraph G as follows: "G. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools" Section 2. Paragraph A of Subd. 5 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subparagraph 5 as follows: 115. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools 2 acres" Section 3. Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph A of Subd. 5 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "2. Elementary schools 5 acres" Section 4. Subparagraph 4 of Paragraph B of Subd. 6 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended as follows: 114. Other Uses a. All conditional use buildings or structures including buildings or structures accessory thereto except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools b. Driving ranges, tennis courts, maintenance buildings and swimming pools accessory to a golf course C. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools 50' S0' 50' 50' " 50' 50' 50' 50' 30' 35' 35' 35' " Section 5. Subparagraph 7 of Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended as follows: 117. Day care facilities, licensed by the State, located within the single dwelling unit building" Section 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. JON J. JOHNSON MARK J. CONDON GREGORY A. MCCLENAHAN+ TIMOTHY J. LEERS MARY E. CHRISTENSON CHRISTOPHER E. CELICHOWSKI MARK A. WAGNER ROBERT E. KUDERER .ALSO LICENSED IN IOWA IALSO LICENSED IN WISCONSIN TALSO LICENSED IN NEBRASKA February 15, 1996 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55435 Dear Mayor Richards: AGENDA ITEM: II.A. JOHNSON & CONDON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW FINANCIAL PLAZA 7235 OHMS LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55439 -2152 TELEPHONE (612) 831 -6544 FAX (612) 831 -1869 PAMELA B. DODDS CAROLE LOFNESS BAAB MARY E. KOHL ELIZABETH BENSON POWELL B. JON LILLEBERG JAMES P. ASHLEY JAY A. TENTINGER*t DAVID R. DRISCOLL GREGORY R. BROOS TERESA M. CROKE DIANA L. BRENNAN MICHAEL MOBLEY RUDY V. ILLGEN OF COUNSEL MARCIA A. MILLICAN OFFICE MANAGER I am writing this letter to support the proposed rezoning or variance requested by Steven Williams and his company Especially for Children. I am an Edina resident and also own a building at 7235 Ohms Lane, Edina, Minnesota which is a few blocks from the proposed rezoned property. As you know, the property is currently not being used as a church and has not been on the tax rolls for the City of Edina. The property is bordered on the North by office buildings, on the East and Northeast by Highway 100 and on the West by an apartment building. Obviously to call this area residential is a stretch for the rezoning opponents. To allow its use as a daycare center will significantly assist those people who need quality daycare, provide jobs for city and state residents, add to the city tax rolls and promote use of a currently abandoned building. I read with interest Alan Hohenstein's letter in the February 14, 1996 Edina Sun Current. As sophisticated and knowledgeable elected officials, I am sure that you and the City Council can look beyond his untruths, half -truths and scare tactics. How residents who live at the intersection of Highway 100, 70th Street and Metro Boulevard can complain about cars coming and going at all hours is beyond me. My wife Janet and I strongly support use of this abandoned church as a daycare center and the proposed rezoning. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, JOHNSON & CONDON, P.A. Mark J. Con MJC: kmw 92586 —FEB 19 96 18:30 MN ACTU Richard & Jayne Robins 5406 Creek View Lane Edina, MN 55439 February 19, 1996 Mayor Richards City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: I am an Edina resident. AGENDA ITEM: II.A. I am inn so of the Edina City Council approving the amendment to change the ordinance to add Child Care as a conditional use under R -1 zoning. P.1 /1 I live in the neighborhood of the proposed site and drive through the West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard intersection daily. I do not think that adding a Child Care facility will adversely effect the traffic flow. I think that the Edina City Council should do all they can to keep quality Child Care facilities conveniently located within Edina. My children currently attend Especially for Children. Our plan is for them to continue to attend Especially for Children until they are old enough to attend Edina Public Schools. Please pass the amendment so that Especially for Children can remain within Edina. Sincerely, 6di ' Richard & Jayne Robins & Family ALAN R. HOHENSTEIN 5104 WEST 70- STREET AGENDA ITEM: I I .A. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 (612) 941 -5665 . �ebruar 1�. il?96 Dear Mayor and Council Members: If the Council transfers Day Care to R -1, Edina will be the only metropolitan city permitting day care facilities to be built on residential properties. Because home buyers do not expect Day Care or for - profit facilities to be build on residential property, every seller of a house will be required to disclose the unique nature of Edina's zoning. I am confident that the value of homes will decline and homes will be difficult to sell. The February 15 issue of the Star Tribune contained a notice that the House committee has approved all -day kindergarten in 50 schools in Minneapolis and St. Paul. With kindergarten children in school all day there will less of a need for child day care centers and if the school day is extended to the other grades there will be even less of a need for child day care. With more children in school there is no need for day care facilities on residentiai property. The council stated that construction of day care facilities on the thirty plus parcels with the requisite two acre minimum or the purchase of houses for day care is remote and in any event would be controlled by the Council. It tnis is the case then the Amendment is for the explicit purpose of facilitating the sale of the church at 5015 W. 70th Street. The church at 5015 W. 70th Street was unable to remain viable and with a diminished need for child day care it is ,just a matter of time before the williams project goes bankrupt as well. The church is unsalable as a church and with an additional 6,000 square foot education wing it definitely will be unsalable to another church. Who is going to buy a converted church which has been denuded of all trees and shrubs and completely enclosed by a chain link fence? The answer to me is obvious. A developer of a five story office building which gets us back tuii circle to Steven Williams' original intent. Expanding a four lane city street to a seven lane highway is unthinkable. Tne Amendment is bad law and the Conditional Use Permit violates existing law and both should be turned down. The market value of my house was reduced in a valuation prepared by Jane rauius. therefore. she should abstain from voting on the Amendment and the Conditional Use Permit due to a conflict of interest. Very truly ° aurs, /7=:z riIan r'. hohenstein FILE No. 477 0220 '95 12.25 IMORPORATE COITIUNICIATION AGENDA ITEM: ]February 20, 1996 City Clerk's Office City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 fax: WY-764.5 II.A. We are writing to express our support for adding child care to the conditional use seWan of F -1 zoning in the City of Edina. Dy making such a change to Edina's zoning code, you will be enabling a valuable community resource -- Especially For Children child care center — to stay in Edina. Although we are not residents of Edina, we would certainly support such a measure within the City of St. Louis Park. As homeowners, we would not fear that property values or the quality of life woWd decline if there wprP a child care canter in our neiglhhnrhond. As working parents who are also homeowners, we can say with confidence that the presence of a child care center in a neighborhood would only inake it a More attractive place to live. IIigh quality child care, like that provided by Especially for Children, is extremely hard to find. After our daughter was born last spring, we spent countless hours over more than a month's time calling and visiting home -based day care providers and day care centers across the western suburbs in order to find the excellent care our daughter now receives at Especially for Children. Please don't force us to endure that search process again by disallowing the conditional use proposal made by the Williams'. Sincerely, j g Kwon Pak and Amy K. Pak 713 Lynn Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416 4? , P-,� PAGE 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: kris Aaker DATE: February 20, 1996 SUBJECT: C -96 -1, Conditional Use Permit. Steve Williams. 5015 West 70th Street. Recommendation: Agenda Item # I I. B. ❑ Consent Information Only n Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion x] Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of the permit subject to: 1. Cost sharing by proponent of intersection and semaphore improvements including dedication of necessary right -of -way. 2. Developers modify existing 70th Street exit-to function with a right -in and right -out exit from the site as part of their development plan. Information /Background See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and correspondence. CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 15, 1996 TO: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineerx� SUBJECT: Especially for Children Proposal at W. 70th and Metro Blvd. If the project is granted approval, three conditions should be applied in the form of an agreement with the developers. The three items are: A. Dedicate appropriate amount of right -of -way to allow for construction of the new signalized intersection at 70th & Metro Blvd. B. Developers agree to a special assessment of $25,000.00 spread over ten years and waive any right of appeal. C. Developers construct and pay for north site driveway configuration as part of their development plan. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 1996 7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon . Johnson, Chuck Ingwalson, Geof Workinger, David Runyan, Helen McClelland, David Byron, Nan Faust MEMBERS ABSENT: Ann Swenson, Lorelei Bergman STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the November 29, 1995. II. NEW BUSINESS: C -96 -1 Conditional Use Permit 5015 West 70th Street Steve Williams . Mr. Larsen informed the Commission at their November 1, 1995, meeting, they voted to recommend approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment which would allow day care as a Conditional Use in the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. The Amendment is currently scheduled for City Council action on January 16, 1996. Since the Amendment is not .yet adopted, Planning Commission action must be contingent on the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen explained the Conditional Use Permit proposal would allow day care as the principal use of the property. The proposal includes remodeling the existing facility and the construction of a 5,700 square foot classroom addition to the building. These improvements are consistent with prior proposals the Commission has reviewed. Mr. Larsen pointed out the exdsting parking lot would remain under the proposal and would be the primary parking area. A few new short term spaces would be added near the new addition. Access to the center would be from a revised intersection at Metro and West 70th Street. The revised intersection has been designed by SRF the City's traffic consultant. The design also recommends closing the existing West 70th Street curb cut. The existing building and the proposed improvements comply with Zoning Ordinance standards contained in the proposed Ordinance Amendment. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit subject to City Council action on the Amendment and the following conditions: Payment by proponent of cost of modifying intersection and semaphore Closing existing curb cut on West 70th Street The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Williams were present to respond to questions. Their architect, Mr. Ed Kodet was also present. Commissioner McClelland asked if it makes more sense to leave the existing access on West 70th Street open, and become right in and right out only. Mr. Kodet responded right in and out is desirable, but is not essential. Mr. Williams interjected the capacity of the day care center is 140 children, and past experience has indicated that arrival and departure times are spread throughout the day so closure-of that curb cut should not be a problem. Commissioner Workinger and Commissioner McClelland expressed concern with the drop-of situation within the campus. Commissioner McClelland asked if drop -of times are staggered. Mr. Williams reiterated that arrival and departure times are staggered. He added typically you only have five to seven cars arriving /departing at the same time. Commissioner Ingwalson pointed out in his experience drop off locations usually reflect the nearest location to the childs class. Commissioner McClelland suggested internal signage on the campus to direct traffic flow, and drop off, and questioned if the proponents believe there could be potential safety issues with dropping off children, parking, and backing out into the internal flow of traffic. Commissioner McClelland concluded by reiterating she believes a right turn in and out only on West 70th Street is appropriate. In response to Commissioner McClellands inquiry regarding potential safety concerns with dropping off children, Mrs. Williams clarified it is the policy of Especially for Children that no children are "dropped off", all children must be signed in and out by their parent or guardian. Mrs. Williams said she is having trouble understanding the concern expressed regarding drop off and parking by Commission members. Commissioner McClelland said her concern is because the site is "tight" and. near a busy intersection. Mr. Kodet interjected the width of the "flow lane" is 32 feet, plus -the 20 foot parking stall, concluding he believes the flow lane at 32 feet is adequate to accommodate the backing out of vehicles. Commissioner Byron said he is concerned with staffs recommendation to eliminate the curb cut on West 70th Street, commenting that he agrees with Commissioner McClelland that right turn only onto West 70th Street should be allowed. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval subject to action by City Council on the Amendment, and payment by proponent for the cost of modifying the intersection and semaphore, and the additional condition that modifications are to be made to ensure that the curb cut on West 70th Street be kept open for purposes of right turn egress only. Commissioner Workinger interjected he would like to see modifications made in the curb cut that would physically keep it open (right in /right out), but would prevent crossover for vehicles wishing to travel west on 70th Street and that any modifications be paid by the proponent. Commissioner Byron agreed to the suggestion that modifications be made to prevent crossover,, adding he does not have an opinion on if the proponents should pay for that modification. Commissioner McClelland interjected the proponents have indicated they would pay for any improvements, and believes they should be financial responsible. A majority of Commissioners expressed agreement that the proponents should be responsible for the modification(s). Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. 3 LOCATION MAP CONDITIONAL USE NUMBER C -96 -1 L O C A T 10 N 5015 West 70th Street REQUEST To allow day care as a Conditional Use in the RO1 Single Dwelling Unit District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CH Rfs RES 1��j,1 ■1 ONE Oil CONDITIONAL USE NUMBER C -96 -1 L O C A T 10 N 5015 West 70th Street REQUEST To allow day care as a Conditional Use in the RO1 Single Dwelling Unit District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, JANUARY 3, 1996 C -96 -1 Conditional Use Permit 5015 West 70th Street Steve Williams The Commission, at its November 1, 1995, meeting, voted to recommend approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment which would allow day care as a Conditional Use in the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. The Amendment is currently scheduled for City Council action on January 16, 1996. Since the Amendment is not yet adopted, Planning Commission action must be contingent on the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. The Conditional Use Permit proposal would allow day care as the principal use of the property. The proposal includes remodeling the existing facility and the construction of a 5,700 square foot classroom addition to the building. These improvements are consistent with prior proposals the Commission has reviewed. The existing parking lot would remain under the proposal and would be the primary parking area. A few new short term spaces would be added near the new addition. Access to the center would be from a revised intersection at Metro and West 70th Street. The revised intersection has been designed by SRF the City's traffic consultant. The design also recommends closing the existing West 70th Street curb cut. The existing building and the proposed improvements comply with Zoning Ordinance standards contained in the proposed Ordinance Amendment. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit subject to City Council action on the Amendment and the following conditions: Payment by proponent of cost of modifying intersection and semaphore Closing existing curb cut on West 70th Street � J AO January 1 , 1996 De�.r rJavor and Counc i 1 Members: Nonnay, February 5 will be a landmark day for the residents of Edina. the Council w I I I vote on changing the zoning to permit day care tac;littes to be built and operated on residentially zoned properties ana also viDte on a request for a Condition Use Permit (CUP) to convert a aeiunct church into a child day care center. Day care facilities are not defined in the Ordinance Amendment, therefore, Day Care could include not only child day care but also adult day care, respite care and perhaps even animal day care. The r;menament does not define "day" in day care. What constitutes a day:' Is it the typical work day of 8 am to 5 pm, is it similar to the hours of a for profit day care center, 6 am to 10 pm, or is anything less than 24 hours? These and other problems result from mixing POD -1 uses with the R -1 residential zoning, if the Council transfers day care to R -1, Edina will be the only metropolitan city permitting day care facilities to be built on resident.iai properties. Because a day care facility, however defined, has a higher market value and generates more income than houses, real estate developers will descend on Edina like a sworn of locusts buying and removing our homes in a manic feeding frenzy. No home, regardless or :slue. cJill be safe. A multi - million dollar home could one day find a ua; .are center as its neighbor. lather r ypee. of care facilities may also request to built on residentiai property. With the changes under consideration in Wasnington and in the Minnesota Department of Human Services greater emphasis will be placed on limited care facilities for seniors instead of nursing homes. Limited care facilities include assistive care, alternative care, residential care and custodial care facilities none of which have on duty medical, staff and, therefore, are not classified as nursing homes. If one type of property use is transferred from POD -1 to R -1, what defense does the City have against a request for a twenty -four hour care facility? After all, during the hours of 10 pm and 6 am the facility residents are sleeping or otherwise inactive and cars will not be drive to or from the facility. Ii: the Aoienclment. and CUP are approved, as a fellow resident of Edina, do you want to wake up to the sounds of hundreds of cars dropping a couple hundred loud, Joyous, screaming, crying children to a building on the lot next to or down the street from our home? That is what will happen if the Council approves the amendment and the request for a conditional use permit. Twenty -four hours a day, seven days a week our lives will be disrupted by the coming and going of cars, parents and children. 'There are almost thirty residential sites that meet the proposed minimum two acre requirement. However, nothing would prevent a developer from purchasing and removing our homes to construct a day care center. Pay particular attention to child day care centers as you drive around the metro area. You will notice that their architecture is designed to attract attention and appeal to children. Trees and shrubs are replaced by fences for the protection of the children. Bright well lit signs are erected as advertising to working parents with children. Do you want a sign, of who knows what exotic design, sitting or standing on the ,curb on the lot next to your house or across the street. The sign could be lit from 6 am to 10 pm. It could be the object you view from the living room window or the light shining in the bedroom window at night.. The Edina City Gode is designed to prevent such a travesty caused by mixing commercial and residential zoning yet the Code has been ignored by both the City Planning Department and the Planning Commission. The Council is the last vestige of reason and should reject both the Amendment and the request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) because they violate the basis upon which this great city was founded, they are not for the general welfare of the residents and because the ramifications of there approval cannot be redetermined with certainty. ahown below are excerpts from the relevant sections of the Code that applies to both the Amendment and the CUP: 850.01 ... to maintain an attractive living and working environment, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of Edina and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. Maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use. Control the use,. development and expansion of certain non - residential uses in the Single Dwelling Unit District in order to reduce or eliminate undesirable impacts of such non- residential uses. Reduce employment- related automobile trips. Estaoiish standards for landscaping and screening to contcibute to the beauty of the community, add to the urban forest and buffer incompatible uses.from one another. Both requests should be rejected because they do not, Preserve and enhance the residential character of Edina, Naintain single family dwellings are the dominant land use, ("ontroi rion- .resi dent ial use in single dwelling districts to reou:re oc eliminate undesirable impacts, Pedtace employment related automobile trips, Estaw isn screenings to buffer incompatible uses from one another. The (,ode sections that apply specifically to the CUP are as follows: 850 Review of the Overall Development Plan by the Planning Commission. Recommend approval by the Council upon finding that the proposed Development: a. c. Wi;l not t-ie detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. d. e. 1 not result In undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. r. Curiiorms to the, provision of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. 850 - -�5 Conditional Use Permits The Council shall not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use, I. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare. �. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion. :a. wlll not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the va -lue of other property in the vicinity. I� _�nsist.rnt :1ih the i_'omprehenslve Plan. it the Ordinance Amendment is approved, the Request for a Conditional Use permit should be rejected because the CUP, Causes undue traffic hazards, Is injurious to the use and enjoyment of property in the vicinity, Will decrease the value of other property in the vicinity and, Is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The market value of my house was reduced in a valuation prepared by Jane Paulus,. therefore, she should abstain due to a conflict of interest it the request for a Conditional Use Permit is put to a vote. 'chat is the impact on the church. Has the church been compensated or c:outd it have been. compensated as part of the final taking through condemnation? The following is gleaned from the files covering all of the several takings of the church property. 'The .documents state that it was agreed by the State and the City appcaisers mat the highest value of the property was not as a church but as an office development even though approval for such development was never requested or received. The earlier "takings" used the higher orfice cieveiopment value in reimbursing the church assuming a change in zoning would be granted. After several "takings" by the State and 'the City of Edina, the property dropped below the three (3) acre minimum for use as R -1 property, however, the State and the City continued to value the property at its higher office development value. 'The following is a quote from the February 22, 1974 Condemnation Court Order: "By treating the property as having a best and highest use for office buildings the appraiser need not go into questions of severance to the church building." That is, assign a value to the building. The Shenehon July 1, 1974 appraisal states, , "The land value for a suitable Edina church site should be at most $40,000 per acre... The Jana value for the subject was previously estimated at ... $392,040 or x272,000 greater than that value level for a suitable Edina church site. .. it would be appropriate and consistent with this valuation analysis to project a - zero -value for the church improvements with the existing church... The current estimated land value based on highest and best use considerations for the site is great enough to render the building 100% obsolete ... The appraiser concludes that the building has no value and the land as valued for its highest and best use is 3.25 times its value as church property. 'The church was compensated for the building and the remaining 2.6 acres by virtue of accepting the 325% higher office district value over several condemnation proceedings even though the property was not zoned as office district. Does the property qualify for a variance due to its smaller size and the building is less than the 50 foot offset? The rollowing are the relevant Code citations: 850 -11 Non-Conforming Land i . . lot :4nicn c_ioes not meet the requirement o.f the zoning district in wnicn it is locared or of Section 810. of the Code due to the en= Rctmenr. :,f r,he Section or Sections 810 of the Code or any arrienaments. but which met al l of such requirements as of the date the l of :•ras estaoi i snea oc created of record. 810 -4 Variances ucanr.ea only upon finding that an unusual hardship exists. The hardship is cause by this Section and not by applicant. 850 -18 Findings for Variances ... which were not created by the petitioner. The property is non - conforming and a variance cannot be granted. C014CLUS I ONS : 1. The AmenLunent should be rejected but if approved, the Conditional Use Permit should be rejected. The City is not hindering the sale of the property. 3. The church as been compensated for all of the property that was taken as well as that which remains. 4. The request for 'a Condi '°aUthe unjust enrichment to twice the owner by virtue of allowing 5. The property has been reduced to the point that it is undevelopable. b. The church snoulu donate the property to the City. SffEK SCALE r - 300 g i 1 i� a • a O • a V • V t i =E i A4 SMERM SCALE 1"= 3D4D' CL 2 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # i i . c . FROM: Kris Aaker Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends To HRA DATE: February 20, 1996 © To Council SUBJECT: C -96 -2, Conditional Use Action E] Motion Permit. City of Edina Paramedic (EMS) /Fire © Resolution Station. ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the permit. Information /Background See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and correspondence. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 1996 7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman David Runyan, Lorelei Bergman, Geof Workinger, Helen McClelland, Nan Faust, David Byron MEMBERS ABSENT: Ann Swenson, Charles Ingwalson, Gordon Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Ten Paulfranz, Jackie Hoogenakker. . I. _APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Byron moved approval of the January 3, 1996, meeting minutes. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: C -96 -2 Conditional Use Permit City of Edina Paramedic (EMS) /Fire Station Location: Yorktown Park 73rd and York Avenue Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City of Edina is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a Paramedic/Fire Station in Yorktown Park.. Yorktown Park is classified as a neighborhood park and has an area of about 3 '/ acres. The park contains a softball field, tennis courts and a city pumping station. The tennis courts would be removed when the new station is constructed. Yorktown Park and all City parks are zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The Zoning Ordinance allows governmental buildings in all zoning districts subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Larsen explained the proposed station would have a first floor area of 4000 square feet with a mezzanine level containing an additional 825 square feet. The building contains three garage stalls and facilities for paramedics. The building exterior would be a combination of brick and stucco (drivet) with a standing seam metal. roof. Mr. Larsen included staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The new fire station meets Zoning Ordinance requirements fora governmental Conditional Use. The location of the new station will improve service in a high demand area of the City. Mr. Ted Paulfranz, Edina Fire Chief was present to respond to questions. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Paulfranz if there are plans to landscape the new station. She pointed out the frontstreet setback is deep enough to accommodate plantings. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland questioned if a majority of the emergency calls come from our senior population. Mr. Paulfranz responded there is a landscaping plan that will be incorporated on the site. Continuing, Mr. Paulfranz told -the Commission a majority of the emergency,calls do come from Edina's senior population. We have a number of calls regarding falls and possible heart attacks /strokes. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Paulfranz to outline a typical day at the fire hall, and how a new EMS station will be incorporated into the system. Mr. Paulfranz explained the Tracy Avenue fire station. is a 24 hour manned operation, and the proposed EMS station will be manned daily for an 8 to 12 hour shift. Continuing, Mr. Paulfranz reported a majority of the emergency calls that come into the Tracy station are placed during peak traffic hours 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 to 8:00 p.m., with a significant drop in calls after 8:00 p.m. Mr. Paulfranz noted a number of these calls originate from east Edina. Mr. Paulfranz told Commission Members it is difficult for emergency vehicles leaving the Tracy station to access cross -town highway traveling east during peak hours, resulting in the use of local streets, which adds time to a run. The proposed EMS station will better serve the residents of east Edina during these crucial peak hours, and will reduce response time for those calls where minutes can make a difference. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Paulfranz if he has any safety concerns during the hours the building is unmanned. Mr. Paulfranz noted a majority of fire stations are unmanned during parts of the day and evening. Many communities have volunteer fire departments so activity is sporadic in those buildings, and they are unmanned a majority of the time. He concluded by saying he is confident the building will be secure when if,is unmanned. Commissioner Runyan asked if they feel there will be walk -in traffic at the new station. Mr. Paulfranz said he does not think this station will have as much walk -in activity as the Tracy station. Continuing, Mr. Paulfranz said Tracy Avenue is manned 24 hours a day, and certain walk -in services are offered to the community. Blood pressure checks are common, and on occasion this walk -in service has saved lives. Continuing, Mr. Paulfranz added because of the pro)amity to the freeway many people pull off the freeway with medical emergencies, or are lost and need directions. Concluding Mr. Paulfranz said Tracy is a very busy operation, and staff does not believe the location of the proposed EMS station will create the number of walk -ins similar to those received at Tracy. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Paulfranz if he anticipates longer shifts at the new station in the future. Mr. Paulfranz said he does not see that happening. He stated the proposed EMS station is not going to be constructed to accommodate a 24 hour, seven day per week operation. It is not needed, and a change in operation is not anticipated. Concluding Mr. Paulfranz pointed out east Edina is completely developed, and staff does not visualize population changes in this area in the future. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Paulfranz if he believes more staff will be required to man the new station. Mr. Paulfranz said at this time it is felt that no new staff will be required. Crews will report to both stations. Commissioner Runyan noted the storage area located in the building, and questioned what will be stored in that space. Mr. Paulfranz said a majority of storage is dead storage for record keeping. All runs have to retain their records, which ends up to be a lot of paper. Commissioner Runyan questioned if the proposed facility is required to meet ADA standards. Mr. Paulfranz said the facility needs to meet all ADA requirements. Commissioner McClelland questioned if a need arises for more paramedics at the new station, can more be hired. Mr. Paulfranz-said that is an issue the Council would address. Commissioner McClelland asked if trouble responding to calls is anticipated during evening hours if the new station is unmanned. Mr. Paulfranz reiterated after 8:00 p.m. emergency calls drop significantly, and after midnight almost no calls are received. Mr. Paulfranz concluded staff is confident the Tracy station can handle calls received after 8:00 p.m.. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Paulfranz how many ambulances are in operation at one time. Mr. Paulfranz said the City has three ambulances, which can be operating at the same time. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. I CONDITIONAL USE NUMBER C -96 -2 L O C A T 10 N Yorktown Park REQUEST Construct a Paramedic (EMSyFire Station EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 31, 1996 C -96 -2 Conditional Use Permit City of Edina Paramedic (EMS) /Fire Station Location: Yorktown Park 73rd and York Avenue The City of Edina is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a Paramedic/Fire Station in Yorktown Park. Yorktown Park is classified as a neighborhood park and has an area of about 3'/z acres. The park contains a softball field, tennis courts and a city pumping station. The tennis courts would be removed when the new station is constructed. Yorktown Park and all City parks are zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The Zoning Ordinance allows governmental buildings in all zoning districts subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed station would have a first floor area of 4000 square feet with a mezzanine level containing an additional 825 square feet. The building contains three garage stalls and facilities for paramedics. The building exterior would be a combination of brick and stucco (drivet) with a standing seam metal roof. The site plan provides for 12 parking spaces for employees and visitors. An additional 10 spaces could be added north, of the building if needed. The building meets the 50 foot setback requirement for Conditional Use buildings in the R -1 district. The proposed station provides bays for an ambulance, a fire pumper and a utility vehicle. An EMS crew would be stationed at the site for an eight hour shift during the period between 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. The fire pumper would not be manned on a regular shift, but would be used on -call by firefighters. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The new fire station meets Zoning Ordinance requirements for a governmental Conditional Use. The location of the new station will - improve service in a high demand area of the City. CITY OF EDINA Application for: [ ] LOT DIVISION [ ] REZONING [ ] VARIANCE [ ] PLAT Proposed Name PLANNING DEPA TMENT Case Number - 0 In -� Date Fee Paid 4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET . EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 (61 2) 927 -8861 [ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [ ] FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN [ ] PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Name � ��f�GU1Jc' 0, L49W -T Address (,iry 4yt juA Phone (6 � t PROPERTY Name el OF E;M f � OW ER: Address � �IV-S 7 (If Different / from Above) Phone Legal Description of Property Property Address 1 so l l O2k , `l (J oak -1o,c» P4 !'I Present Zoning P.I.D.# Explanation of Request: 0,44tkAe- IN U-se pl�Dvv\� COIN" 1% 1-0 (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: Name 1L��S��) - �i� \C� �-�� Phone /_ (15 12) 222' I Z44 SURVEYOR: Name e ) c.. Property Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature Date Date 1/85 RRK� 0 ig% r•-- -f \ - =AIV 1. -IV t- .V.(�. r-VM_r_ MAIN ' I I BITUMINOUS PATH 3D' STORM SEWER ��� EASEMENT EXIST. IO CONC. STAIR • I •�- ..................... t_ .�.....�...- ...�....� F'AR4ING: 41 30' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT R. - FIRESTATION F, E- I EDINA, MINNESOTA E'15 F RIDING FIRE EMS PARKIW -z : 0 R 71 / EXIST. • I AS METER _:_ -- 71 / �G ..- •---- ..... _ ..____._..___� — .................... -- MON—- ....... ............................ ................. . 0 15 30 +s 60 r EXIST. - -.. - - -- —_ 0 ELECT. TRANS. Z I I EXIST. PUMP H0U5E TROSSEN WRIGHT 10' UTILITY ___ - "—EX15T. ARCHITECTS P.A. 45 T cv EASEMENT — ' ENNi5 COURTS EXIST. S I T1= FLAN BASEBALL BACKSTOP SCALE: 1' = 30' -0' 40' -0' R 0 EXIST. LIGHT POLE I EXIST. ELECT. " IETE EXIST. ELECT. JCT. B XES (3) EXIST. :ONC. 3 T AIR �— EXIST. ELECT. JCT. 5:)X EXIST. JCT. BOX TEL. 0 20' EASEMENT EXIST. -IRE HtrDFRANT 0 ig% r•-- -f \ - =AIV 1. -IV t- .V.(�. r-VM_r_ MAIN ' I I BITUMINOUS PATH 3D' STORM SEWER ��� EASEMENT EXIST. IO CONC. STAIR • I •�- ..................... t_ .�.....�...- ...�....� F'AR4ING: 41 30' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT R. - FIRESTATION F, E- I EDINA, MINNESOTA E'15 F RIDING FIRE EMS PARKIW -z : 0 R 71 / EXIST. • I AS METER _:_ -- 71 / �G ..- •---- ..... _ ..____._..___� — .................... -- MON—- ....... ............................ ................. . 0 15 30 +s 60 r EXIST. - -.. - - -- —_ 0 ELECT. TRANS. Z I I EXIST. PUMP H0U5E TROSSEN WRIGHT 10' UTILITY ___ - "—EX15T. ARCHITECTS P.A. 45 T cv EASEMENT — ' ENNi5 COURTS EXIST. S I T1= FLAN BASEBALL BACKSTOP SCALE: 1' = 30' -0' 40' -0' R 0 EXIST. LIGHT POLE I MEZZANINE SCALE: 1/8' a I'-V 54 FIRESTATION EDINA9 MINNESOTA REFERENCE NORT14 WW%P= mmmm� 0 5 10 20 TROSSEN WRIGHT ARCHITECTS P.A. I6' -0' - L 50' -0. UP I .... ............................... " -------- MEN'S SWOUJER KITCWr--N El 01 ......... ..•••••... ..- --•--•• ... ...... C)AYRCCrl BEST FkADIO/OFFICES .....•. ....................... I .................... ................................ 1&,-0* 12*-0' el FIRST FLOOR FLAN (4,000 5a, FT.) SCALE: 1/8' I EMS SUPPLIT L 9 -q4ofo/j CLEAN/ 00001 �, / I I m L -4 I/e;'- I . . . . | ' | Illp LIALL-1- r9_ H I M ILH wumm -- ---- ----------- go 11 1 URI 11 ` � � � ^ .� ^ . II.C. ZZLI, 7L zp ZC-ez February 15, 1996 II.C. City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE:. Case File # C -96 -2 I am in receipt of your Notice of Public Hearing for a new fire station at Yorktown Park. That location is the most ridiculous place for a fire station for several reasons. The main reason is York Avenue is a very, very busy street. Most of the time you have to wait to get on to York Avenue because of the traffic. And, we just don't need any more sirens in the area. We have enough sirens with police and ambulances going to the Walker Elderly Suites and surrounding streets. A better location for the fire station would be across the street from Fudruckers and the Mexican food place or 76th & France where you don't have all the condominiums. Please reconsider. Sincerely, Jean Koopman f' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # I I . D . FROM: Kris Aaker ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: February 20, 1996 x❑ To Council SUBJECT: B- 956 -2. Variance for Action ® Motion Dale Kelash, 5104 Gorgas Avenue. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny a 164 square foot lot coverage variance for the above mentioned property. Information /Background: On January 18, 1996, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and denied the applicant's request for a lot coverage variance. The property owner is appealing the decision to the City Council. Attached for reference are the following materials: * Minutes of the January 18, 1996, Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. * Staff report * Correspondence regarding the plans presented. 0 City of Edina, Minnesota City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 January 24, 1996 At the request of the Zoning Board of Appeals, January 18, 1996, we wish to appeal the Boards' denial of a variance for 164 square feet over the 2250 limit. Sincerely, Dale an Barb Kelash 5104 Gorgas Av. Edina, MN 55424 (612)- 922 -7846 tiN1r-- . o e tl January 19, 1996 Mr. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina Re: B -96 -2, A 164 square foot lot coverage variance to provide for existing garage structures Dear Mr. Kelash: In connection with your recent request for a 164 square foot lot coverage variance, which was heard by the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals on January 18, 1996, may we advise you that same has been denied. If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than January 28, 1996. If you have further questions on this matter, please contact either Kris Aaker or me at 927 -8861. Sincerely, Jackie Hoogenakker Zoning Board of Appeals h City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612)927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HELD ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 18, 1996 5:30 P.M., MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Don Patton, Geof Workinger MEMBERS ABSENT: Helen McClelland, Mike Lewis STAFF PRESENT: I Kris Aaker, Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Workinger moved approval of the November 16, 1995, meeting minutes. Mr. Patton seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: B -96 -2 Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue South 66th Feet of East 165 Feet of West 300 Feet of Lot 56, Aud. Subd. 172 Request: A 164 square foot lot coverage variance to accommodate existing garage area Ms. Aaker explained the subject property is located along the west side of Gorgas Avenue just north of West 52nd Street. The property consists of a rambler with an attached one car garage built in 1950 and a detached two car garage located in the rearyard built in 1994. Just prior to October of 1994, the homeowner had inquired at City Hall about the Zoning regulations regarding the addition of a two car garage on his property. Staff indicated that maximum lot coverage of 2,250 square feet would be allowed per Ordinance. Shortly after the homeowner's inquiry, a building inspector noticed that a 22' X 28' concrete slab had been poured in the rearyard area of the subject site. The homeowner was notified that a concrete slab is included in lot coverage calculations and that the property violated the lot coverage Ordinance. Ms. Aaker explained on October 21, 1994, 1994, the property owner applied for a building /demolition permit to construct a 22'X 28' garage in the rearyard of the property and to remove a 12'X 14' section of the attached one car garage. The partial demolition of the existing one car garage was required to conform to lot coverage requirements. On November 15, 1995, the property owner was notified, by the building official that the permit obtained for construction and demolition of garage area had expired. It was evident upon inspection by the building department that the new garage had been completed without any alteration to the single stall garage. Ms. Aaker concluded it has generally not been the policy of the Zoning Board to be supportive of lot coverage variances. Staff cannot identify a hardship on the property that would support a variance and therefore cannot recommend approval. The proponent, Mr. Kelash was present to respond to questions. Mr. Kelash addressed the Board and explained in his opinion in order to obtain a two car garage, this was the only solution. Continuing, Mr. Kelash pointed out the width of the lot, and existing house placement forced the rearyard placement of the new garage. Mr. Kelash said a major consideration was maintaining the character of the existing house. He pointed out demolishing a portion of the existing attached garage, and rebuilding the garage wall not only is a major expense, but is not aesthetically pleasing. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Kelash what he believes is his hardship. Mr. Kelash commented their desire was to achieve a two stall garage, and the only way they felt it could be accomplished was constructing a freestanding two stall garage in the rearyard. Concluding Mr. Kelash said his hardship is the width of the lot, and the existing minimal sideyard setback. Mr. Johnson pointed out it is not uncommon to find tandem garages in Edina on lots this size, and a tandem garage is a viable solution in achieving a two stall garage. Mr. Kelash agreed with Mr. Johnsons observation that a tandem garage can be accomplished, but it is not the result they desired. Mrs. Kelash interjected that they have a teenage daughter who will be getting her license in the near future, which creates the potential for the addition of another car to the family, so the two car garage is needed, and a driveway large enough to accommodate parking demand. Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Kelash if the cement slab was poured without a permit. Mr. Kelash responded he checked with the City and was informed a permit is not required for a driveway. Mr. Johnson agreed a permit is not required for a driveway, but a permit is required for a slab poured to support garage. Ms. Aaker interjected explaining Mr. Kelash approached the City regarding construction of a freestanding garage, and was informed if he constructed the garage as indicated, his property would not comply with City lot coverage requirements and he would need to apply for a variance or modify his plans to eliminate the excess coverage. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Greg Bomsta, a City building official, was made aware the slab had been poured without Mr. Kelash obtaining the required permit. Mr. Bomsta informed Mr. Kelash a permit is. required for construction of a garage slab, and before further construction can commence permits must be applied for and issued: Mr. Workinger asked Mr. Kelash what alterations have been made to the existing attached garage structure. Mr. Kelash explained a hole was cut in the rear of the attached garage to accommodate drive through access to the freestanding garage. Mr. Workinger asked Mr. Kelash in his opinion, what needs to -be. completed. Mr. Kelash said the new garage needs hardware, paint and electricity. If the attached existing garage is allowed to remain intact, the rear of the garage needs to be finished. Mr. Workinger questioned the time frame for completion of the renovations. Mr. Kelash said he wants the structure(s) completed by Spring. Mr. Coleman, 5113 Gorgas Avenue told the Board he feels what was promised to take place should occur, and in this instance Mr. Kelash pulled a permit to construct a new garage, and demolish a portion of the existing garage, and that is what should be done. Mr. Workinger asked Mr. Coleman in his opinion, if the existing garage were ordered to be removed, how would it look to you from an aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Coleman said he would not have a problem with removal of the existing garage, and reiterated a demolition permit has been applied for, and the conditions of the permit should be honored. Mr. Costellano, 5108 Gorgas Avenue said he would rather have had a single stall garage constructed in the rear, instead of the large two car garage. Continuing, Mr. Costellano said the permitting process in this case didn't appear to work, promises were made, and not kept, with the end result impacting the entire neighborhood. Mr. Patton said he is trying to be logical in his decision making, and understands and supports the rights of property owners to improve their property, but in this instance has a problem. He acknowledged the house will probably look better with the attached garage intact, but the circumstances getting to this point are not ideal. Mr. Kelash reiterated their goal was to achieve a two stall garage, but because of the required sideyard setbacks it was impossible to expand the existing attached garage to achieve the desired two stall garage. Mr. Kelash stressed the only way they could accomplish a two car garage was to construct it in the rearyard, and drive through the existing garage. Mr. Patton asked if variances are required for the new freestanding garage. Ms. Aaker explained the freestanding garage meets rear and sideyard setback requirements, and reiterated as a result of construction of the new garage the property is over on lot coverage. Ms. Aaker stated typically how the lot coverage is reduced to comply with ordinance standards is left up to the property owner, however, in this instance the property owners indicated they would remove a portion of the existing attached garage to comply with requirements. Ms. Aaker concluded removal of a portion of the existing garage was never accomplished as part of the permit. The property owner has now applied for a variance to allow him to keep the attached garage intact. Mr. Workinger remarked he likes the appearance of the house from the street, but does not want to speculate on the options presented by the property owner. Mr. Workinger concluded he feels comfortable denying the variance request. Mr. Workinger moved to deny the lot coverage variance request. Mr. Patton seconded the motion. Ayes, Patton, Workinger, Johnson. Motion to deny carried 3 -0. Chairman Johnson informed Mr. Kelash of his right to appeal this decision to the City Council within 10 days •:. = =� w� w� wvmr��- r. r.PT I A •. 1�� w�- MUM 9 I 911 l EMU A O10111[N1I =J_\: I'm 0 EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT JANUARY 8, 1996 B -96 -2 Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue South 66th Feet of East 165 Feet of West 300 Feet of Lot 56, Aud. Subd. 172 Zoning: R -1 Request: A 164 square foot lot coverage variance to accommodate existing garage area Background The subject property is located along the west side of Gorgas Avenue just north of West 52nd Street. The property consists of a rambler with an attached one car garage built in 1950 and a detached two car garage located in the rearyard built in 1994. Just prior to October of 1994, the homeowner had inquired at City Hall about the Zoning regulations regarding the addition of a two car garage on his property. Staff indicated that maximum lot coverage of 2,250 square feet would be allowed per Ordinance. Shortly after the homeowner's inquiry, a building inspector noticed that a 22' X 28' concrete slab had been poured in the rearyard area of the subject site. The homeowner was notified that a concrete slab is included in lot coverage calculations and that the property violated the lot coverage Ordinance. On October 21, 1994, the property owner applied for a building/demolition permit to construct a 22' X 28' garage in the rearyard of the property and to remove a 12' X 14' section of the attached one car garage. The partial demolition of the existing one car garage was required to conform to lot coverage requirements. On November 15, 1995, the property owner was notified, (see attached letter), by the building official that the permit obtained for construction and demolition of garage area had expired. It was evident upon inspection by the building department that the new garage had been completed without any alteration to the single stall garage. Issues /Analysis The property owner has applied for a variance from the lot coverage requirements to allow the existing one car garage to remain. The property owner has, indicated the following with regard to his request. • The lot is only 66 feet wide and does not allow for addition of a 2nd garage stall to the existing garage • Removing the original garage would be detrimental to the look of the neighborhood. It has generally not been the policy of the Zoning Board to be supportive of lot coverage vanances. Conclusion/Recommendation Staff cannot identify a hardship on the property that would support a variance and therefore cannot recommend approval. CITY OF EDINA Application for: ( ] LOT DIVISION [ ] REZONING [� VARIANCE [ ] PLAT Proposed Name PLANNING DEPARTMENT Case Number Z Date Fee Paid 4801 VVEST FIFTIETH STREET . EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 (61 2) 927.8861 [ ] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [ ] FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN [ ] PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Name Joe, /E? Aa 41 Sh Address Ave Phone ( )�1.�� -7gy&�' PROPERTY Name OWNER: Address (If Different from Above) Phone ( ) Legal Description of Property The s-lza to /�' 11: 214 /'h 2 4Zas1" Lr- J T rA0- 0/,2 s r 3Gd 12T �� f /� T ti �,,_� ��I► 10� -� sub �-1 t;au �`7Z Property Address Present Zoning P.I .D. # Explanation of Request: Ti, -- re4_s�!f�TD t1 a r 4�/ra 9 e d ,? 92 t 64 VP ter+ P 121.,2 v /-? r I (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: Name Phone ( ) SURVV/ DR:,, Name„ n Phone ( ) rty Q4vner's Signature Applicant's Signature Date Date 1/8S Application .... page 2 Minnesota statutes and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: (If yes, please explain. Use additional sheets if necessary.) YES NO a) Relieve an undue hardship which was / not self - imposed or a mere in onvenience. iti e- <, p s etz %.- rhP b) correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. C) Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. d) Not be materially detrimental to the public v welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. h � DATE: January 11, 1996 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 FROM: Dale and Barb Kelash 5104 Gorgas Av. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Case File B -96 -2 The following are reasons we are requesting a variance to provide for existing garage structures: ➢ Our lot is too narrow to widen the existing garage. ➢ The available coverage left was not enough for a 2 -car garage. ➢ The only access to a new 2 -car garage is through the existing structure. ➢ We estimate the cost of removing the existing structure would be $12,000. The demolition would include the removal of the entire roof structure over the kitchen, dining room and part of the living room, plus the expense of the time and materials to replace I it. We are presenting 3 designs: ➢ Leave as is including the door. This would preserve the historical integrity of the design. ➢ When the door is open, there is a view of a flower garden in the back yard. ➢ The new garage is not visible from the street. 2. ➢ Remove garage door. ➢ Finish inside walls. 3. ➢ Remove part or all of he walls of existing garage ➢ Support the roof with posts. In summary, we believe or desire for a 2 -car garage without destroying the'house is not unreasonable. The coverage limitations for our specific lot creates an unnecessary hardship. It does not allow us to have a 2 -car garage and maintain the historical integrity of our home. The expenses we would incur is out of proportion when compared to the benefit. Thanks for your time, and please consider our request. Sin rely 1 Dale and arb Kelash . tn�A.tw, ° 2 *P �^ City of Edina. Minnesota ADJUSTMENTS ZONIlVG BOARD OF APPEALS AND A.DJ 4801 West 50th Street • Edina. Minnesota 55424 • (612) 927 -8861 ............................................................................................ ............................... N.0:T:t.C,� FTUBL1C�H RiI�L -- B -96 -2 Property Owners.Within 200 Feet CASE FILE: TO: APPL.IC,-%.NT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PURPOSE. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue The South 66 feet of the East 165 Feet of the West 300 Feet of Lot 56, Auditors Subdivision 172 A 164 square foot lot coverage variance to provide for existing garage structures DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING. PLACE OF HEARING: HOW TO PARTICIPATE: January 18, 1996 S30 Phi Edlna City Hall 4801 West 50th Street 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and/or 2. Attend the bearing and give testimony for or against the proposal FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 (612) 9274MI DATE OF NOTICE: January 8, 1996 ,Oynda % Carlson 5105 %lrfax 8&7a, 94% 55424 612 -926 -7378 January 18,1996 Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Planning Board: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to respond to Dale Kelash's request for a variance (Case file B- 96 -2). My home is directly behind the Kalesh property. I understand Mr. Kelash's rationale for keeping the attached garage is that its removal would render his house aesthetically unappealing to the neighborhood. The attached garage with its back wall removed now serves merely as a structure through which his vehicles pass on the way to the backyard garage. Mr. Kelash's concern for his neighbors is highly suspect and unfortunately belated in view of the following circumstances. Mr. Kelash's garage /driveway project is an eyesore. The project has been under construction intermittently for about two years, with building materials and equipment lying about. In fact, the garage still is not completly painted. Neither the roofing material nor the paint matches that of his house. A dirt pile abandoned from the construction was eventually overtaken by weeds. The headlights from his vehicles shine into the rear of our house whenever he arrives and departs. We eventually built a fence in our backyard to screen Mr. Kelash's unsightly property and vehicular activity. The fencing and subsequent landscaping cost us thousands of dollars. I hope that Mr. Kelash can be persuaded to honor his original commitment to abide by Edina's ordinance. Perhaps he can choose which of his two garages he would prefer to remove. If Mr. Kelash has genuine concern for the appearance of the neighborhood, good will of his neighbors, and his own property value, he will remove the monstrous mess he created in his backyard. I am opposed to granting Mr. Kelash a variance. Respectfully, Lynda K. Carlson 11;�MAL December 4, 1995 Mr. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Kelash; I am in receipt of your letter of November 30, 1995 stating your intention to apply for a variance to the lot coverage requirement. While I might be able to appreciate the position you find yourself in, opportunities to address the issue are not being taken in a timely fashion. Your desire to be in compliance may be more convincingly portrayed by applying for a variance now. The permit which you signed for accepting conditions of issuance is now over one year old. Waiting .until May for conclusion on a variance request will cause the matter to have aged over eighteen months. To demonstrate your good intentions and solicit support of the necessary bodies having control you would be better served to promptly apply for the variance, get on the planning commission schedule as soon as possible and have a time schedule for a contingency plan should the variance be denied. I have enclosed an application for a variance for your convenience. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 927 -8861 Ext. 333. Sincerely, Ron Wasmund Chief Building Official cc Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Greg Bomsta Building Inspector November 30, 1995 Mr. Ron Wasmund Chief Building Official City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Wasmund: 'his is to inform you that I will be applying for a variance to increase my lot coverage by approximately 150 square feet. I intend to use the winter months to aquire the necessary drawings and documents in order to make a presentation to the planning department. I hope to have the variance I need before May 1, 1996. Please feel free to contact me either in writing or by calling me at 922 -7846. Sincerely, ■ F Oi J City of Edina November 20, 1995 Mr. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgus Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Kelash: Thank you for the phone call today in response to my letter. An inspection has been scheduled for 11:00 am on Tuesday November 21, 1995. It was my understanding from our telephone conversation that you preferred that we schedule and proceed with the inspection irrespective of your schedule. During our telephone conversation you indicated that you could not start the demolition of the existing garage until spring because of the extensive amount of roof on the house that needs to be rebuilt to facilitate the removal of a portion of the existing garage. Whether you agree with the ordinance or not the fact remains that by virtue of the conditions of issuance you agreed to remove a portion of the existing garage with the construction of the second one. You also asked about the possibility of a variance to lot coverage requirements. Variance are generally applied for and considered at the conception of a project. We are now one year into the project. Never the less,if you desire a variance you must make your request to the planning department and document the hardship the variance would be based on. Financial hardship is not considered by law to be a reason for variances. You may contact Kris Raker Assistant Planner for details on a variance application. Whether by demolition or variance you must comply with lot coverage requirements identified at permit issuance before you may occupy the new garage. Please let me know at your earliest convenience which direction you are going to proceed with. I will not turn this over to the City Attorney if I get a written response from you stating your intentions by December 4, 1995. I may be contacted by phone at 927 -8861 extension 333. Sincerely, Id.- it Ron Wasmund Chief Building Official City Hall cc Kris Aaker Assistant Planner (612)927.8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREEGreg Bomsta Building Inspector FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 ptA A. jif OI City of Edina November 15, 1995 Mr. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Kelash: Our records indicate that building permit 94003147 was issued to you on October 27, 1994 for the construction of a 22' x 28' detached garage at 5104 Gorgas Ave. The issuance of the permit was conditioned on the removal of 12 lineal feet of the existing attached garage for compliance with lot coverage limits set by City Code. In review of the file we find that the permit has expired and there is no history of inspection. So that we may verify that the permitted and required work has been completed in compliance with applicable codes please contact the Inspections Department no later than November 22, 1995 to arrange for the required inspections. Failure to do so is a misdemeanor offense. You may be subject to court penalties if prosecuted. You may arrange an inspection by calling the Building Inspection Department at 927 -8861 between the hours of 8:00am and 4:30pm Monday through Friday. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Ron Wasmund Chief Building Official cc Kris Aaker Associate Planner Greg Bomsta Building Inspector City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 e,i Lily of Edina June 26, 1995 Mr. Dale Kelash 5104 Gorgas Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Kelash: cords indicate that you hold an active building permit Review of our building permit re to construct a detached garage in the rearyard chedoone ocapgarage. aAs of June lt26, permit to remove 12 feet of your existing attached 1995, a garage has been constructed in your rearyard area. Demolition of the existing garage has yet to be accomplished. Please note expires Please also7no5e All conditions of the permit must be completed prior to exp that the city has received a complaint regarding the unfinished nature of the garage (no. siding). he pr The purpose of this letter is to inform you that a final with c�ytcode oject will be conducted on October 30, to confirm complia nce w Sincerely, Kris P. Aaker Assistant Planner KPA /jh ddg- 0 0 0.10 (612) 927.8861 City Hall FAX 16121 927 -7635 TDD (6121927-5461 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55423 -139.3 :ITT OP'EDIYI 1801 TEST :OTI STISIT 30IY1. IN 5:124 511- 927 -3361 RISIDENTIAL 3UILOIXG111C1YATION PERMIT APPLICI' - ea stsa ssaa sa s: sssss s: sassas sassssassassssssssssttssat )ATE: f �2 - 2 / - !2,q `1T9 ADDRESS. 4-10 'Y F N911 COHSTIL'C : :3. ; .T 9LOCI ALU9 OF PROPOSED PROJECT :E'.=SIY1 OF LAND COSTSI S nP t�r. — OCT % 1 1994 ' CITY OF EDINA BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT ?ROPOSIO STILT .ATE: OtOPOSID COIPLITICN DATE: ASCRIPTION OF 11011 TC H 0019: ACANT CiiG.i wig: /:]ILD9YlCJITIAC I OY�MBI�i TEIINT OTIY1 9UILDEZICCNTIACTC:.:':'t Of 41NMESOTI LICSNSE NUMBER: I01191'S NAAKI IAOOR9SSI ICITTI ISTITEI (LIP CODER (PIOR9 1u1RRl (TUUT -S NA011 (A001LSS1 (CITT1 (STITEI (LIP COOYI IP1011 101111',1 (BOILDRI'S NAI11 (AD011SS1 (CITT1 (STITYI ILIP COOYI IP9011 1011111 itttsassaassasssssasssassaassassssssssstasasaasaaatssaassaas asssasssssnasassa w asset aasssssassssaasaasassssa uaasssasaasmtaasasssssc MOTe: S6CTIOI Il0 Of TIE 0111 0001 -TER 1110TAL. GRADIIG 110 LICITITIIC. 1E00I1YS TIIT 1PFLICITIOIS It 1CC01P11I10 IT 1 FLU 01111 TO SC1: AT 1 SC1LY Of MOT LESS TIU 011 INC1 SOOILS IO FEET. AND RUST COITIII TRY FOLLOIIRG INFORIATI01: �. LOCITION Of T8E TIIQ TO 19 1U0VK0 a. EIISTIIG 110 FROPOSIO IOILDIIGS 110 STIOCMU C. EIISTIIG 110 PIOPOSIO'COTTOOIS ). PROVISIONS OF TETPOUIT 110 P913I111RT EROSION COITROL -IF SOIL IS TO BE STOIYO T91F. ON SITY-TR911. SOT IUCI 110 FO1 1RIT LEIGTI Of TIT K. PROPOSIO 114EGIT1TI01 OF OISTMED A19A 7. PROVISIONS 101 TEIP01111 110 F9RIIIRT OuluG1 If T09 RATE ANY OOISTIDIS 111=116 "t'18OV1 LISTE0 1900I11111TS. PLUS&.COITICT CIYG 101STA O1 1019 SCIIWIG. CITY Of 90111. i s••• sassssasatssssssatasaa ssssssss�fsssss ms samsss asas sfso3yemsa�s a�asss ss aasesss: mssssssaassommmmstsosassmmasasm w r ROOF: GABLE REVERSE GABLE H_IP EAVE OVERHANG: RAKE OVERHANG: _ SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. FELT Roof Sheathing Manufactured Trusses 2" x 4" Double Top Plate Seal Down Shingles .OTE: 1) Roof approved by Minn. State Building Dept. as meeting Minn. State Code Requirements of 30# snow load. 2) Hip roofs consist of 2" x 6" rafters. 2" x 6" cross ties 48" O.C.. 2" x 8" hip rafters and no plywood gussets are used. RAFTERS: Trusses ® 24" O c: STUDS: 1;7 4 . >�� 24" O.C. WALL SHEATHING: SIDING. - OVERHEAD DOOR HEADE; double 2" x 12" or 2 - Micro Lams x Slab on grade construction approved per Minnesota State Code. Refer to State Building Code Letter Number 11 SLAB: 4" WITH MESH 6" x 6" 010 Gauge Trim 1 "x4" Sub Fascia \ Fascia `— Soffit — 3i4' Cove 2" x 4" Studs Siding C I A- Gt L "m 1.2" x 7" Anchor Bolt 2 'x 4" Treated Bottom Plate Q j Grade 45 4" C. 4, �I i _eynda CX Carlson I I . D . 5105 glalifax Cdina, 9V% 55424 612 - 9267378 February 20, 1996 Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Planning Board: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Case File # B -96 -2, Dale Kalesh's appeal to the denied variance at 5104 Gorgas. I support the Zoning Board of Appeals' decision to deny the variance. Attached is my original letter opposing the request. I hope that Mr. Kalesh will understand that Edina ordinances were not drafted frivolously. The ordinances protect all property owners equally. In this case, Mr. Kalesh and his neighbors are protected from residential property owners paving over and/or constructing buildings on a disproportionate area of their lots. I remain opposed to the variance request. Resp lly, Lynda K. Carlson ,Qynda 'X. Carlson 5105 91alifax Edina, 9V9Y 55424 612 - 926-7378 January 18,1996 Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Planning Board: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to respond to Dale Kelash's request for a variance (Case file B- 96 -2). My home is directly behind the Kalesh property. I understand Mr. Kelash's rationale for keeping the attached garage is that its removal would render his house aesthetically unappealing to the neighborhood. The attached garage with its back wall removed now serves merely as a structure through which his vehicles pass on the way to the backyard garage. Mr. Kelash's concern for his neighbors is highly suspect and unfortunately belated in view of the following circumstances. Mr. Kelash's garage /driveway project is an eyesore. The project has been under construction intermittently for about two years, with building materials and equipment lying about. In fact, the garage still is not completly painted. Neither the roofing material nor the paint matches that of his house. A dirt pile abandoned from the construction was eventually overtaken by weeds. The headlights from his vehicles shine into the rear of our house whenever he arrives and departs. We eventually built a fence in our backyard to screen Mr. Kelash's unsightly property and vehicular activity. The fencing and subsequent landscaping cost us thousands of dollars. I hope that Mr. Kelash can be persuaded to honor his original commitment to abide by Edina's ordinance. Perhaps he can choose which of his two garages he would prefer to remove. If Mr. Kelash has genuine concern for the appearance of the neighborhood, good will of his neighbors, and his own property value, he will remove the monstrous mess he created in his backyard. I am opposed to granting Mr. Kelash a variance. Respectfully, Lynda K. Carlson REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III . A. FROM: Francis Hoffman'�6,[1- ❑ Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 February, 1996 Fx-1 To Council SUBJECT: Utility and Drainage Action ❑ Motion Easement Vacation in the Coventry at Centennial Lakes Resolution Project ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate utility and drainage easements per the attached graphic. Also, developer must relocate Paragon Cable TV junction box and line if necessary to construct Building 5. Info /Background: The developer of the Coventry at Centennial Lakes has requested that the City vacate certain utility and drainage easements granted on earlier plats. Current construction plans and plats result in different locations for utility and drainage easements. NSP, Minnegasco and US West have no objections to the request. Paragon Cable does object, but only to the extent necessary to protect a junction box on one of the easements. Staff has spoken to the developer and the developer will work with Paragon Cable to relocate cables if necessary in the Building 5 area. This condition would be part of the building permit process. Staff would recommend approval of the vacation request. I: - ) 10 0 oRA mAcE AND ura i ry cAsruEmr z: OUTLO T B .EXHIBIT B EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT 7 DRAINAGE AND urlL i rr EASEMENT PER rtfc PLAT — THE COVEN iRY Ai CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADD i ri ON rO BE VACA rEO OT- 1 2 J 4 5...6: 6 7 8 BLOCK 80 I I - 0 'K 5 8 aOX 2 L OUTLOT A 7— 7 11% I / / 2 4 L5 5 6 BL OCK ORA INACE AND uriL ry EASEMENT SEE DETAIL B PER ME PL A r OF THE CRESCEN T A r CENTENNIAL LAKES TO BE VACArED - DRAINACE AlVb urafry EASEMENT ' SEE DETAIL A PER W PLAT or rmE CRESCEmr Ar CENTENNIAL LAKES ro Be VA CA rro DATE OF PREPARATION: JANUARY 16, 1996 DETAIL A NO SCALE OUTLOr A PLAT PER ME PEA r OF rHf CqESCEV r A r III CENTENNIAL LAKES rO BE VACA !LID OUrLO=TA DETAIL B A EDENOTES EASEMENT AREA l TO BE VACATED NORTH 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET UR9AN DESIGN 181 IA03 C4-ESMEX-DWG BJY REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # Iv -A. FROM: David velde ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: February 20, 1996 Q To Council SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1995 -13. Action ❑ Motion An Ordinance Requiring the ❑ Resolution Licensing and Inspection of Parking x❑ Ordinance Garages adjacent to Multiply Residential ❑ Discussion Ruildinnc Recommendation: Grant second reading to Ordinance 1995 -13 requiring the licensing and inspection of parking garages adjacent to multiple residential buildings and amending Section 185 of the City Code by adding a $35.00 license fee for the parking garages and a $65.00 inspection fee for the garages. Information /Background: On December 4, 1995, the City Council granted first reading to this Ordinance. A hearing was held on January 2, 1996, at which time staff was directed to meet with the property owners for the purpose of receiving their input into this Ordinance. On February 8, 1996, staff met with ten property owners, managers, and interested parties. The items discussed at this meeting included: 1)There should be no fee for these inspections; 2)ln lieu of inspections by the city, the owners and managers asked that the City allow them to provide proof that the building and parking garage comply with this Ordinance; 3)That the City allow the use of carbon monoxide sensors in the garage to activate the exhaust fans and that the sensors be connected to sound an alarm if the carbon monoxide were too high; and 4)That this Ordinance not become effective until September 1996 to allow them time to explore their options for licensing the garages. Ordinance 1995 -13 has been amended by including language which allows the licensee to provide an affidavit certifying the garage and building is in compliance with this Ordinance. A copy of the proposed affidavit is attached to Ordinance 1995 -13. This Ordinance would become effective July 1, 1996, with an annual expiration of June 30th of each year. Licensing is handled through the Clerks office and if the Ordinance were to become effective in September, the workload would conflict with elections. Staff does not believe that using carbon monoxide sensors in lieu of inspections is a feasible alternative at this time. We do not have enough data on sensor operated systems to accept this alternative. Sensors may be used in these buildings and will be accepted by the Department as long as the licensed premises comply with this Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 1995 - 13 AN ORDINANCE ADDING NEW CODE SECTION 740 REQUIRING THE LICENSING AND INSPECTION OF PARKING GARAGES ADJACENT TO MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended to provide a new' Section 740 as follows: "Section 740 - Ventilation of Parking Garages for Multiple Dwellings 740.01 Purpose and Objectives. Subd. 1 Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to protect the public from - unacceptable levels of carbon monoxide in dwelling units. Subd. 2 Objectives. The general objectives of this Section include the following: A. Prevent carbon monoxide from exceeding the maximum level in dwelling units. B. Monitor carbon monoxide levels periodically. C. Correct and prevent conditions that may allow unacceptable carbon monoxide levels. 740.02 Terms and Definitions. Multiple Dwelling. Any building with three or more dwelling units as defined by Section 850 of the Code. Parking Garage. An enclosure used for vehicle parking measuring over 1000 square feet in area and capable of being closed off from ambient -air. Ventilation System. An air exchange system operated by an electric exhaust fan and inlet opening designed to ventilate a parking garage. 740.03 Scope. This section shall be applicable to all multiple dwellings with a wall, floor, or ceiling adjacent to a parking garage. 740.04 License Required. No person shall own or operate a parking garage with a wall, floor or ceiling which is adjacent to any multiple dwelling without first obtaining a license from the City. Subd. 1. License Application. The application for a license under this Section shall be submitted on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall be accompanied by the fee in the amount set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Subd. 2. License Procedure and Control. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and the holders of such licenses. Subd. 3. Term. Licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall expire on June 30th of each calendar year. Subd. 4. Inspection Fee. An inspection fee, as set forth in Section 185 of this Code shall accompany the license application. In lieu of an inspection fee, the applicant may submit an affidavit, on forms provided by the Clerk, demonstrating proof that the licensed premises are in compliance with this Section, such affidavit shall be completed by a person or persons acceptable to the Sanitarian. The submission of the affidavit shall not prohibit the Sanitarian from entering and inspecting the licensed premises as set forth in Section 740.06. 740.05 Standards. Subd. 1. Maximum level of Carbon Monoxide. At no time shall the level of carbon monoxide exceed 9.0 parts per million (ppm) within any dwelling unit, or other area located in a multiple dwelling which is designed or used for residential occupancy. Subd. 2. Ventilation. All components of ventilation systems shall comply with the requirements of the Uniform Mechanical Code and shall at all times be fully operable for the purpose of ventilating the parking garage. 740.06 Inspections and Right of Entry. For the purpose of determining compliance with the provisions of this Section, the Sanitarian is authorized to make inspections at such times as the Sanitarian deems necessary, to determine the condition of the property and the carbon monoxide level. For the purpose of making such inspections, the Sanitarian is authorized to enter, examine and survey all dwellings, dwelling units, rooms, garages, and premises upon which the same are located at all reasonable times including peak traffic periods. The owner, operator and occupant of every dwelling, dwelling unit, and rooms, shall give the Sanitarian free access to such dwelling, dwelling unit or room and its premises including parking garages for the purpose of such inspection, examination, and survey. Every occupant of a dwelling unit or rooms shall give the owner of it, or the owner's agent or employee, access to any part of the dwelling unit or its premises, including parking garages, at all reasonable times, for the purpose of making the repairs or alterations as are necessary to effect compliance with the provisions of this Section. Section 740.07 Enforcement Subd. 1. Notice of Violation. Whenever the Sanitarian determines that there has been a violation of any one or more provisions of this Section, the Sanitarian shall give notice of such alleged violation to the license holder in person or by registered mail. The notice shall: A. Specify the violation or violations alleged to exist or to have been committed and the repairs or improvements required to bring the dwelling, dwelling unit or rooms into compliance with the provisions of this Section. B. Provide a time limit for the correction of the violation or violations specified. If the license holder cannot be found or served after diligent effort, service may be made upon such person-or persons by posting a notice in a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling affected by the notice, in which event the Sanitarian shall include in the record a statement as to why such posting was necessary. Subd. 2. Imminent Hazard; Temporary Condemnation. Whenever the Sanitarian finds any dwelling, dwelling unit or rooms in a multiple dwelling in violation of the standards established by this Section, and further finds (i) that by reason of such violation it presents an imminent and serious hazard to public health, or to the physical or mental health of the occupAnts in it, and (ii) that the repairs or improvements required to correct the violation do not appear reasonably possible within a time which will be adequate to eliminate such imminent hazard, then the written notice of violation provided for in Subd. I of this Subsection shall also state that the premises are unfit for human habitation and shall order that the dwelling, dwelling unit or rooms be vacated either, immediately or after such period of time as the Sanitarian shall find reasonable in view of the circumstances, pending the completion of action to eliminate the violation. In such case the notice shall be served by delivering a copy to the person in real or apparent charge and control of the multiple dwelling and by posting the same at a conspicuous place upon the structure. ' In the case of a hazard which affects more than one dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling, service shall be made upon an occupant of each dwelling unit, except that the failure to make service upon an occupant of one unit, shall not affect the validity or effect of service of notice upon an occupant of other units. Subd. 3. Failure to Correct Deficiencies. Whenever notice has been given in accordance with Subd. 1 of this Subsection and the license holder has failed to correct the deficiencies specified in Subd. 1 of this Section within the time allowed, the Sanitarian may either: A. Extend the time for correction of the deficiencies, or B. Serve upon the license holder a written notice requiring that the dwelling, dwelling unit, or rooms be vacated because it is unfit for human habitation. Subd. 4. Contents of Notice. The notice shall (i) state the violation or violations which remain uncorrected, and (ii) provide a time limit, within which to vacate the premises. The written extension of time or notice to vacate may be served personally or by registered mail in accordance with the procedures set forth in Subd.I of this Subsection. Subd. 5. Correction of Violation by City; Assessment of Cost.. If the license holder fails to comply, the Sanitarian may proceed to abate or remove the violation and have costs assessed against the property according to procedures set forth in Section 1070 of the City Code. Subd. 6. Unlawful to Resume Occupancy. No dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit which has been designated as unfit for human habitation and placarded as such shall again be used for human habitation until written approval is secured from, and such placarding is removed by, the Sanitarian. The Sanitarian shall remove such placard whenever the defect or defects upon which the designation and placarding action were based have been eliminated and the dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit has been made to conform to the standards established by this Section. Subd. 7. Unlawful to Deface Placard. It shall be unlawful for any person to deface, remove or obscure any placard posted under the provisions of this Section. Section 2. Schedule A of Section 185 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following fees: Purpose Sec Subsec of Fee /Charge Amount Fee No. 740 740.04 Parking Garage License $35.00 158a 740 740.04 Parking Garage Inspection Fee $65.00 158b Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective July 1. 1996. First Reading: December 4, 1995 Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current: Attest: City Clerk Mayor CARBON MONOXIDE MONITORING AFFIDAVIT FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING GARAGES Date of Report Name of multiple dwelling or complex Address of building Property Manager or Owner receiving report Name of Monitoring Company Address of Monitoring Company Telephone Number Qualifications of Evaluator Name of Evaluator Make and Model of Carbon Monoxide Meter Date of Calibration I certify that the information and statements contained in the attached report are true and accurate and that all data collected was obtained using equipment and methods acceptable to the Sanitarian. Signed Signed and sworn before me, a Notary Public On this day of 19 Date Page 1 of 3 CARBON MONOXIDE MONITORING RESULTS Date Time Address All Carbon Monoxide measurements must be recorded in parts per million (ppm). Ambient air pm Outdoor Temperature F/C Parking Garage: High pm Low_ppm Hallways: Main Floor /Common area: High pm Low _ppm Second Floor: High _ppm Low pm Third Floor: High _ppm Low_ppm Fourth Floor: High _ppm Low ppm Additional Floors: Dwelling Units (where applicable) High___ppm Low pm Building Address Date Evaluators Name Page 2 of 3 Describe the garage ventilation frequency including length of time the fans are on and off, if the fans are operating continuously for specific periods during the day and if the fans are operated by a carbon monoxide sensor, at what level do they activate and deactivate the exhaust fans. Provide the make and model of the garage exhaust timer or carbon monoxide senor used to operate the exhaust ventilation system. If the exhaust system is operated by a carbon monoxide sensor, at what concentration are the fans activated and at what concentration are the fans turned off. On Off Date(s) and frequency that the sensor is calibrated. Are all ducts in good condition and free of obstructions? (where applicable) _Yes No If unacceptable, submit a report indicating what corrections are needed to repair the system. Are all penetrations through the garage ceiling sealed? _Yes No If unacceptable, include a copy of the report indicating what corrections are needed to properly seal the area between the garage and living spaces and provide documentation showing the date that the corrections were completed. ********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Are the halls ventilated? Yes No Does the air flow from the garage into the living spaces? _Yes No Do the door(s) separating the garage from the dwelling spaces effectively keep the garage air from entering the living spaces? _Yes No Building Address Evaluators Name Date Page 3 of 3 TO: , Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 1/2 Ton Pick Up Company 1. McKays Fleet Sales (Henn. Co. Contract #3579A5 -232) 2 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: AGENDA ITEM V. A. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 14,687.57 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ McKays Fleet Sales $ 14,687.57 GENERAL INFORMATION: This puchase is a one -half ton pick up for use by the Engineering Department. This purchase replaces existing unit No. 25 -218, a 1985 vehicle, and will be financed through the Equipment Replacement fund. Signat re ' The Recommended Bid is within budget :_✓ Public Works - Engineering Department , not Ilin, Finance Director Ke6heth Rosland,(Pity Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 1/2 Ton Pick Up Company 1. McKays Fleet Sales (Henn. Co. Contract #3579A5 -232) 2 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: AGENDA ITEM v" B _ Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 14,687.57 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ McKays Fleet Sales $ 14,687.57 GENERAL INFORMATION: This puchase is a one -half ton pick up for use by the Street Department. This purchase replaces existing unit No. 25 -702, a 1985 Chevrolet, and will be financed through the Equipment Replacement fund. Sign ure The Recommended Bid is within budget not with Public Works - Streets get_, ,.b lin, Finance Director Rosland, Dit#j Manager tN�1l e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 1/2 Ton Pick Up Company 1. McKays Fleet Sales (Henn. Co. Contract #3579A5 -232) 2 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: AGENDA ITEM v _ r _ Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 14,687.57 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ McKays Fleet Sales $ 14,687.57 GENERAL INFORMATION: This puchase is a one -half ton pick up for use by the Utility Department. This purchase replaces an existing unit No. 70 -263, a 1987 pickup, and will be financed through the Public Works Utility Department budget. Signature The Recommended Bid is X within budget not withi Public Works - Utilities Department Ilin, Finance Director Kenneth Rosland, Ckty Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 JA I t: 1u renruary, l aab ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 3/4 Ton 44 Pick Up Company 1. Superior Ford, Inc. (Henn. Co. Contract #3579A5 -232) 2 3 4. 5. M%jr-Num 11Myi V.L. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 19,455.42 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Superior Ford, Inc. $ 19,455.42 GENERAL INFORMATION: This puchase is a three - quarter ton 44 pick up for use by the Utility Department. This purchase replaces existing unit No. 70 -268, a 1989 vehicle, and will be financed through the Public Works Utility Department budget. Sign ure The Recommended Bid is X _ within budget not Public Works - Utilities k�J in, Finance Director Rosland, City Manager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR, PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: One One -Ton Pick Up Cab & Chassis, 84" Wheelbase Company 1. Erickson Chevrolet, Inc. (Henn. Co. Contract #3579D5 -232) 2 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Erickson Chevrolet, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 21,032.67 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ $ 21,032.67 This purchase is for an 84" wheelbase one -ton pick up cab and chassis. This unit will be primarily used in the Utility Department for the catch basin and manhole repair crew during the construction season. A flat bed box will be added to this unit to support the appropriate tools on this unit. This purchase will be funded through the Utility Department Equipment Replacement funds. This replaces Unit No. 70 -114. -,e /,!/ ✓7��/ Public Works - Utilities Signatu Dep ent The Recommended Bid is within budget not withV by0get �IVallin, Finance Director Kenneth Roslanif,CZity Manager Iz 1 '� o e tA TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Francis Hoffman, Director.of Public Works Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: One One -Ton Pick Up Cab & Chassis, 60" Wheelbase Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Erickson Chevrolet, Inc. (Henn. Co. Contract #3579D5 -232) 1. $ 20,831.22 2 2. $ 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Erickson Chevrolet, Inc. $ 20,831.22 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for the replacement of existing Unit 25 -203, 1987 model. This unit is a one -ton pick up cab & chassis to which a small dump box will be added for use by the concrete repair and sod damage repair crews primarily. This unit is funded through the Equipment Replacement fund. Signat re . The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works - Streets Department n, Finance Director Kenneth Rosland, Ci"anager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1996 AGENDA ITEM v.c;_ ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 1/2 Ton Extended Cab Pick Up Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. McKays Fleet Sales (Henn. Co. Contract #357965 -232) .1. $ 18,715.62 2 2. $ 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: McKays Fleet Sales $ 18,715.62 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is a one -half ton extended cab pick up for use by the Utility Department. This purchase replaces existing unit No. 70 -269, a 1990 pick up, and will be financed through the Public Works Utility Department budget. This vehicle is being removed from the fleet one year early due to the extensive repair costs for maintenance of this vehicle. The Recommended Bid is X within budget Public Works - Utilities Department C not within bvj get, allin, Finance Director Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 February, 1995 AGENDA ITEM v.H. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Annual Street Sweeper Broom Stock Purchase Company 1. Jim Hatch Sales Co. 2. MacQueen Equipment, Inc. 3 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 13,198.33 2. $ 14,207.10 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ Jim Hatch Sales Co. $ 13,198.33 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the annual purchase of street sweeper broom stock. This purchase amount is budgeted annually under the street sweeping portion of the Public Works budget. The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Public Works - Streets Department not within budget Johp WAlin, Finance Director Rosland,LCita Manager M •,v v R REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: February 13, 1996 AGENDA ITEM V.I. ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Toro gas greensmower. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. MTI Distributing Company 1. $ 17,328.63 2. 2. $ 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Budget Acct No: 0646 -4901 MTI Distributing Company $17,328.63 GENERAL INFORMATION: This new Toro greensmower is part of the equipment replacement budget for Braemar Golf Course. Park and Recreation Si# ture ent The Recommended 13id is lX within budget budget not withi,6, bt4get _ Ohn yVallin, Finance Director Rosland,((;ity Manager CITY OF EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 14, 1996 TO: Mayor Richards and members bVf the Edina City Council. FROM: John Keprios, Directo SUBJECT: Toro Greensmaster purcha e.. As you will note, there is only one bid that was submitted for purchase of an air cooled, gas powered, three -wheel drive greensmower. Other vendors were informed of the advertised bids and still only one vendor submitted a sealed bid. We feel confident that the bid of $17,328.63 is a good price because in 1995 we purchased the exact same model with grooming reels at a cost of $17,943.12. Our price this year is $614.49 better than last year. I called a competing vendor, North Star Turf, to ask why they chose not to bid and was told that they chose not to bid because they cannot compete in price with their comparable Jacobson model greensmower. TO: . ' Mayor 8 City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: February 8, 1996 AGENDA ITEM v. j, ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2 five gang fairway mowers with trade -in of two mowers. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Star Turf, Inc 1. $45,092.10 2. ONLY BIDDER 2. $ 3 3. $ 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Budget Acct No: NORTH STAR TURF, INC. GENERAL INFORMATION: The two new fairway mowers will replace two fairway mowers at Braemar Golf Course. This purchase is part of the budgeted equipment replacement schedule. i / Signatur'e The Recommended Bid is X within budget nt not Finance Director Kenri6th Rosland, Ci CITY OF EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 14, 1996 TO: Mayor Richards and member of the Edina City Council. FROM: John Keprios, Directo SUBJECT: Purchase of two (2) Jaco sen LF -128 Fairway Mowers. As you will note, there is only one bid that was submitted for purchase of two (2) lightweight 2 -wheel drive five gang fairway mowers. Each fairway mower has a 3 cylinder, 4 cycle, liquid cooled 28 horse power engine. These mowers have hydrostatic power steering five (5) 22 inch wide cutting units (gangs). Even though bids were advertised, only one vendor submitted a sealed bid. To be sure that the only bid is an acceptable price, I researched other award of bid results in other municipal agencies in Minnesota who have very recently (1996) purchased the exact same equipment. The following award of bid results are after -trade numbers (including sales tax): Municipal Agency Amount Vendor Hennepin Parks (2 units) $48,071 North Star Turf City of Owatonna (2- units) 47,459 North Star Turf City of Golden Valley (1 unit) 34,352 MTI Distributing_ Similar to'the agencies listed above; this bid includes trade -in of two (2) 1991 LF -100 lightweight fairway mowers. Based on the above research, I feel confident that the bid of $45,092.10, which includes sales tax, is a very good price. REPO RVRECOM MEN DATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # v I, A FROM: Francis Hoffman � El Consent City Engineer ''�� Y 9 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 February, 1996 0 TO Council SUBJECT: City of Minneapolis Request Action Q Motion for Traffic Signal at W. 60th Street and Xerxes Avenue ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion, Recommendation: Review information provided and if Council concurs, authorize staff to complete discussions with Minneapolis involving traffic signal construction agreement. Info /Background: During 1994, City of Minneapolis reviewed the intersection of W. 60th Street and Xerxes Avenue. This is an intersection which borders Edina and Minneapolis. Xerxes Avenue is County State Aid Highway 31. The conclusion Minneapolis reached was that traffic signal warrants were met for (1) peak hour conditions and (2) interruption of continuous traffic. Currently, a four way stop exists at this intersection. Hennepin County reviewed the request and initially the proposed signal request was not in the County priority list. After further review, Hennepin County's priority factor system placed the signal location in 34th position on the priority list. Hennepin County maintains a top 35 list and generally will not approve a signal below that point. Attached is the Hennepin County response to Minneapolis. Edina staff has reviewed the signal justification report and agree that the signal warrants are met. Also, staff sent surveys out to 17 residents on Xerxes Avenue and W. 60th Street on the Edina side. The response to the survey was 8 opposed to a new signal, 6 favor installation and 3 did not respond. Traffic Safety staff review concluded that support should be given if acceptable financial arrangements can be accomplished between Edina, Minneapolis and Hennepin County. Report/Recommendation City of Minneapolis Request for Traffic Signal at W. 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue Page Two It is fair to say that although the intersection technically meets warrants, strong support does not exist from the Edina neighbors, Hennepin County staff or Edina staff. However, in a cooperative effort to bring this issue to a close, staff would recommend that if the signal installation is approved, the following conditions should apply: A. That the Edina share be no more than 25% of the signal construction as only one street leg (W. 60th Street) of four is an Edina street. B. That all maintenance costs in the future be shared in any fashion that Hennepin County and Minneapolis agree to. This would include the NSP costs to provide electricity to the signal system. C. That the Edina share if approved, be only costs that are eligible for state aid funding. Thus no local fund costs are incurred. Precedent exists as Edina and Minneapolis agree to a non - standard signal cost split when Edina developed and constructed the 50th & France project for the signals on France Avenue. 4 SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION REPORT LOCAL MAP a.w—E J DRIVE a 5TH SIT W N H ti N 0TH N ST N N z � � 5 > ST S > W W t W a W a N W N > CA x r d 0 iR J W vi N XERXES AVENUE SOUTH & 1.► a Z < 52 D w ►- W N W Z J W O CL x W FOREST WIE RUSSELL WEST 60TH STREET o LA W W x RD • ADJACENT SIGNALS 53 D S w RED ao�R��� x a.w—E J DRIVE a 5TH SIT W v - z� z � � N 56T ST ix v 57TH ST W � W LA W 58Ti ST rW x oe W z < x 59TH ST = 4n W N W i z W � z W d 0TH ST Wl a' 61ST ST HWT.62 CROSSTOWN x ES AVENUE SOUTH & FIGURE 2 WEST 60TH STREET INTERSECTION LOCATION 4: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 203 Citv Hall 350 Soum 5th Street Minneapolis MN 55415 -1390 (612) 673 -2352 Fax(612)673 -3565 DAVID J. SONNENBERG CITY ENGINEER - DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BRIAN J. LOKKESMOE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /DIRECTOR ENGINEERING OPERATIONS 203 CITY HALL 673 -3316 FAX 673 -3565 MICHAEL J. MONAHAN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /DIRECTOR TRANSPORTATION 233 CITY HALL 673.2411 FAX 673 -2149 J.E. EDMUNDS, DiRECTCR EQUIPMENT SERVICES 1300 CURRIE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS. MIN 55403 673.5737 FAX 348-9380 J M. GARBER. DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION 203 CITY HALL 673 -2410 FAX 673 3565 J.F HAYEK. DIRECTOR WATER WORKS 250 S. 4TH ST. =206 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55415 6732418 FAX 673 -2555 R. KANNANKUTTY DIRECTOR ENGINEERING DESIGN 309 2ND AVE. S. =300 MINNEAPOLIS. MIN 55401 673 -2456 FAX 673 -2048 A.E. MADISON. MANAGER FINANCE 219 CITY HALL 673 -2437 FAX 673,3565 R.L. PLETAN_ DIRECTOR GENERAL SERVICES 223 CITY HALL 673 -2706 FAX 673 -3565 R H. SMITH. DIRECTOR MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 203 CITY HALL 673 -2241 FAX 673.3565 S.A. YOUNG. DIRECTOR SOLID WASTE 8 RECYCLING 309 2ND AVE. S-1210 MINNEAPOUE. :'N 55.101 673.2433 FAX 673.2250 TDD (612) 673 -2157 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER June 19, 1995 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works & Engr. 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Re: Signal Agreement - New Traffic Signal Xerxes Avenue S & W 60th St Dear Mr. Hoffman, �nneapolis city of lakes The City of Minneapolis has completed the design of a new traffic signal system for the intersection of Xerxes Avenue S and W 60th Street. We are finalizing the plan and beginning the preparation of an agreement for participation in the cost of construction. We are estimating the cost of construction in 1995 to be approximately $60,000 including preliminary and construction engineering. This estimate assumes the installation will be done by City of Minneapolis forces. The intersection includes a Hennepin County roadway and a Municipal State Aid roadway in Minneapolis and Edina. Hennepin County participation policy for new signals limits the County participation to 25 percent. Consequently Edina and Minneapolis will each be required to fund 37 1/2% of the installation cost. The City of Minneapolis will be utilizing Municipal State Aid funds for its share. Hennepin Ccumy has included f,.:rdz fcr their share of the installation in their budget. Please assign someone from your staff to be the contact person such that we may finalize the agreement language and the signal plans. If you would have this person contact me at 673 -5750 it would be most helpful. Sincerely, Qalg' w� Dallas W. Hildebrand Planning, Programming and Design Engineer DWH:da cc: Michael Monahan B. Polaczyk ® Recycled Paper 30% Post Consumer Fiber i HennepiAn E ual O ortuni Equal Opportunity Employer January 11, 1996 Mr. "allas W. Hildebrand Planning, Programming and Design Engineer City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works 203 City Hall 350 S. 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE: Xerxes Ave. S. and West 60th Street - Proposed Signal Installation Dear Dallas: Thank you for your November 22, 1995 letter to Warren Porter. We have reviewed the signal justification report that you provided and calculated our priority factor. Based on meeting warrants 2, 9 and 11, and a priority factor of 34, we will allow the signal to be installed on our system. Regarding cost, your signal justification report properly assumes that the county would pay the lesser of 25 percent of the cost, or State Aid, whichever is less. The funds that we provided in our CIP for 1996 anticipated the county's participation in a signal at 60th and Xerxes. Minneapolis, as the proposer of the project, would be responsible for obtaining the agreements and cost participation by the City of Edina as well as Hennepin County. Our cost participation would be capped at the maximum of 25 percent of the capital cost of the project regardless of whether or not Minneapolis was able to obtain the financial participation of the City of Edina. I have forwarded the cost agreement to Harlan Hanson who is responsible for the preparation and negotiation of cost agreements for the county. We have asked that Harlan get in contact with you to discuss the process for finalizing an agreement based upon Minneapolis arranging the remaining financing and the concurrence by the City of Edina. Department of Public Works 320 Washington Avenue South RMcW Paper Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 (612)930 -2500 FAX:(612)930 -2513 Mr. Dallas W. Hildebrand January 11, 1996 Page 2 Please be aware that the funds in the county CIP for Minneapolis signal projects are provided to the city on a first -come, first - served basis. To the extent that the City of Minneapolis brings forward projects and there remains money available in this account, we will participate.in accord with our county cost participation policy. This means that if projects exceed programmed costs, or if extra projects are funded ahead of other anticipated projects, then some projects may be delayed. Sincerely, Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:WKP:jh cc: Fran Hoffman w/o enc. Jim Grube w/o enc. Bruce Polaczyk w/o enc. Harlan Hanson w /enc. Warren Porter w/o enc. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item # VI. B. FROM: FRED RICHARDS Consent ❑ MAYOR ED Information Only DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1996 Mgr. Recommends El To HRA SUBJECT: X To Council APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS AND Action ❑ Motion COMMISSIONS ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: We now have several names of persons who are interested in serving for the one opening on the Art Center Board and the two openings on the Health Board. If anyone has additional names you wish considered please submit them by our Council meeting Monday evening. If no additional names are received, I will have a final recommendation at our March 4, 1996 meeting. I i.: TO: COUNCIL FROM: MAYOR RICHARDS I DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1996 SUBJECT: BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Recommendation: REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VI.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Appoint Meg Mannix and William Skallerud to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Info /Background: Attached are the applications for Ms. Mannix and Mr. Skallerud. Based on their backgrounds, I believe that they would be excellent candidates for the Zoning Board of Appeals. I hope to finalize my recommendations for other Board and Commission appointments for the March 4, 1996, meeting. CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS NAME M f-G M A N N x ADDRESS Vf- ZIP CODE -5'S Z0 HOME PHONE ! D CO `t D WORK PHONE I EDINA RESIDENT (number of years) EMPLOYMENT (Firm/occupation/profession) Q vw O A eak AJ " d Its & U j 6 Gl/Yl C'1 CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY Loni 5 . L (l * 6r^. Comvvvt +ex- . -�C�oo ti5. Pte. (.DMCrr4 IUD SeCt� -1. PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or Appointive)_ m rm . ov 6+&LA, )� loomw EDUCATION 0"M-, � �A,k6A �Lll h YI k V1A ', � A �'o (t I Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board/commission and why you are interested in serving: l 1— �e- kve,4 O S +/l0 h h KN II5 OA- mac.' l M, OJA&Q ��'S , CO W1Wl,GI,yk,CiXh 1 r►nR.� 'G'� 11�.. t�e. U � �/1 , a-5 OL ea ( � cis a , vQ*A�z o Fo iv-, UNLI & UV. a L L J� -15 �I'D 0 - CO VKVV "L'11 gtk LA cuK-5 Jak -4& ODL- awL /tLvv* wk (For additional space, use reverse side of application) APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: CoV� /PLANNING COMMISSION HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD ARK BOARD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS ART CENTER COMMITTEE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE RY COMMITTEE COMMISSION ADVIS DATE ► I SIGNATURE 0 (Return completed form to i Clerk's office ) Z umk u)Ltk 6 4CQ- � coVMVIwuI W.Mt , tk V, v25t?.ci tM, ht wA- s we.l a,vd C- , awol cove �e�oc�ve5. 041 +o �oa v�Qs. L Have a ,(au� 05 J CRY OF EDINA 4802 W. 50th Stmpt Edina. MN 55424 62P14CAMN FOR APPQI `MEN.T TO AD_J ICY. X30. DS1MM_NifSSIONS NAME WlUllam R. Skallerud _ ADDRESS 5324 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, MN ` ZIP CODE 55424 HOME PHONE 92� -1012 WORM PHONE 6DINA RESIDENT (number of years) 10 33,4 -2768 EMPLOYMENT (Firm/veeupation/profession) Lawyer and shareholder With ropham. Haik. Schnobrith 6 Kaufman, Ltd_ CMC, PROFESSrDNAL, COMMUNM ACTIVITIES See attached. Delegate IR Caucue; Mentor, William M1Lubell College of Law; former Adjunct Professor, William Mitchell College ut Law PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elecrive or Appointive) Asslar-anc City Attorney, City of Richfield, 1985 -1986. EDUCATION See attached. Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board /conunission and why -you are interested in serving: r a«< all the Minnesota state Court Syercm Alternative Dispute Resolution Approved Wou =raj, Raster for both mediation and arbitration_ My crainlitg and e:peri*nce in these areas, together with. ten years of trial and litigation work in labor and construction cases, should prove to be of some value, particularly with the Planning Cmmis61on, Zoning and Conatruetion Board of Appeals, and with Lite mediation subcommittee of the Human Relations Commission. My greatest areas of interest: are in the planning area at :d with the Park Board. (For additional spacti use reverse side of application) APPOCNTMENT PREFERFENCE: I PIANNINO COMMISSION HBRrrAOlr PRESERVATION BCJRRD 3 PARK BOARD _ HUMAN RCLATIuNS COMMIN51UN ZOtONG BOARD OI= APPEALS 4 CONSTRucnoN BOARD OF Air ems[ ART CUN4ER COMArI=E CQMM 0NrrY KEAS Mi SERVICE• RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE ADYYSC]R C:UMMC1'1'LFi COMMISSION � r DATE 2113/95 51CINATURE (Recurs aomplatcd form to City t ferry office) WII. t -ice M R 9 X A LLr- RU0 A trial lawyer Mr. Skallemd corlcentrates ids graft in aoaaplex litigation, particularly labor and employment and environmental litiptlort, indudtng discrimination claims, S mandwater, soli and airborne contamination and workplace exposure, toxic tart and product lWity law, Mr. SWIerud has substantial litiphan and courtroom experience before federal and state reams. He has also reprw rated private and public entitle6 before mm*IPA, county, state and federal admirdstrative agettdesinduding the Equal Employment Opportuntty Commission, Minnesota Human Rights Agog, Environmental Protection Agency, Mitnresota pollution Control Agemy and the occupational Safety and Health Division of the Minnesota Department of Health. Sore in St. paut Minnesota, in 1959, Mr. Skallerud was raised in Minneapolis; graduated cunt foudefrom Gustavus Adolphus College, in St. Peter, Minnesota in 1981, and received his )uris doctor frout William Wchcil College of Law in St. Paul In 1984 where he wrote far, and was a Staff Member of The Wiliam Miidldl faro Reafero. Mr. Skalkrud was one of the first to cleric for the Minnesota Court of Appeals - He has been an Adjunct Pmfessor of Law at WiUiam WtchellCallege of law, teaching iagal Research and writing in 1987.88 and 1989 -90. Mr. Skallerud has lest rea on CL'RCLA, the Compreisensive Environmental Response, Comperrsatbn and Liability Act, on the Community Right to Xim Act. an the retention and use of experts, and on discovery skills for c,,pkxlitl gOft. Mr. Skallerud is a member of the Labor and Employn,rit Envlronmental Law Toxk Tort Litigation and Products Defense Groin at Popham I l8r1c. i`dr. Skalter ad is also a member of the MinneMDefense Lawyers Association; the labor road Empkgmettit i$w Section and Natural bsoarees, Energy, and Environmental law Section of the Hennepin County Bar Aswelatim the Environmental Law Socl cm of the. Minaesoia, Siate Dar Association; and the Utigatirm Section of the American Bar Awdatlon. Popl-it"M IIA11<- OCkMOUSIC-4 Ir 4C.UpMaM• LYO- 4D.p:.13 iii 02/15/96 THU 16:06 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY 0002 AGENDA ITEM: VI.C. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE. February 15, 1996 RE: Park Referenda To formalize the action taken by the City Council with respect to the Park Referenda at the February 5th meeting, the City Council should by resolution call for the May 7th special election and approve the form of the questions to be submitted to the voters. Attached is a form of such a resolution for consideration by the Council at its February 20th meeting. Section 4 of the resolution sets forth the form of questions to be submitted to the voters. In reviewing Section 4 of the resolution you will note that in addition to the questions the ballot will contain notices concerning property tax increases resulting from the bond issues. These statements are required to be placed on the ballot by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 275.60 and. 61 which were enacted in 1991. The blanks in the statements will be completed based upon the projections prepared by the City Finance Department. JPG:cmn Enclosure 02/15/96 THU 16:06 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY 16003 RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF ISSUING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION THEREON BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. This Council has investigated the facts necessary to ascertain and does hereby find, determine and declare that it is necessary and expedient for the City to borrow money by the issuance of its general obligation bonds in the amount of $5,500,000 to provide funds to improve public parks and other recreational facilities in the City, and that it is necessary and expedient for the City to borrow money by the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $2,500,000 to provide funds to expand Braemar Arena to accommodate an additional indoor, ice skating rink. 2. The questions of issuing bonds in such amounts and for such purposes shall be submitted to the vote of the qualified electors of the City at a special election to be held on May 7,1996. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the special election to be given as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.16. 4. The ballot for the special election shall be in substantially the following form: 02/15/96 THU 16:06 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY 11 004 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL ELECTION Held May 7,1996 QUESTION NO.1 U YES Shall the City of Edina, Minnesota, be authorized to borrow money by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City of Edina in an 17 NO amount not to exceed $5,500,000 to improve public parks and other recreational facilities in the City of Edina? BY VOTING "YES "ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. The maximum amount of the increased tax levy as a percentage of market value is and the amount that will be raised by the new tax rate in the first year to be levied is INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: If you wish to vote in favor of the above proposition, mark a cross (X) in the square preceding the word "YES ". If you wish to vote against the above proposition, mark a cross (X) in the square preceding the word "NO" next to the proposition. QUESTION NO.2 0 YES Shall the City of Edina, Minnesota, be authorized to borrow money by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City of Edina in an [J NO amount not to exceed $2,500,000 to expand Braemar Arena to accommodate an additional indoor ice skating rink? BY VOTING "YES "ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. The maximum amount of the increased tax levy as a percentage of market value is and the amount that will be raised by the new tax rate in the first year to be levied is INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: If you wish to vote in favor of the above proposition, mark a cross (X) in the square preceding the word "YES ". If you wish to vote against the above proposition, mark a cross (X) in the square preceding the word "NO" next to the proposition. -2- n REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI. D. FROM: Francis Hoffman ❑ Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 February, 1996 0 To Council SUBJECT: City of Bloomington Action ❑Q Motion Request to Extend ❑ Resolution Watermain ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve request from City of Bloomington to extend their watermain to connect Minnesota Drive and W. 77th Street through roadway west of National Car Rental. Info /Background: During 1995, representatives of Seagate, Bloomington and Edina met to discuss water services needs for the expansion of Seagate Technology's operation on the south side of W. 77th Street in both the Cities of Bloomington and Edina. A large concern of Seagate was the potential for watermain breaks causing down time in their operations. Their system requires softened water for the operation. Therefore, a back -up emergency system supply from Edina would not solve their immediate needs. The solution appears to be extending the Bloomington watermain east from W. 77th Street through the connecting link road from W. 77th to Minnesota Drive. This would provide a loop system and back -up flow in case of a watermain interruption on the west end of W. 77th Street. Edina and Bloomington staff have talked to representatives of National Car Rental to coordinate the construction. Attached is a sketch of the proposed extension. Edina staff would recommend granting Bloomington permission to extend the watermain with plan approval required by the Edina City Engineer. Also, Bloomington and Edina staff have agreed to review all existing maintenance agreements along our common border and restructure as necessary. There is no cost participation required by Edina other than staff review time. W 77th St. Ex. 8" WM h 00 a¢ k w JOHNSON AVE / PARKLAWN AVE WATERMAM CONNECTION �s 0 0 N �J) O�IO 4� k w National Car Rental Minnesota Dr. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI.E. FROM: Francis Hoffman. - 4 ❑ Consent City Engineer ,%/� Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 February, 1996 ❑ To Council SUBJECT: Preliminary Bicycle Action ❑ Motion Transportation Plan - Hennepin County System ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: For review only. Info /Background: Attached is the preliminary draft Executive Summary for the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan. Also, a colored map is attached for the Edina area. This preliminary plan is in the early review stages but staff felt it appropriate to bring this to City Council for review, given the discussion along W. 66th regarding road construction adjacent to Southdale. This document does not have any official County approval at this stage. The attached colored map indicates three color schemes for potential bikeways. The first bikeway color is red which basically follows railroad right -of -ways currently in use by the railroad or abandoned by the railroad. Some trails /bikeways exist west of Hopkins on this map (upper left hand corner - noted as HCRRA/Soo Line RR). The second bikeway color is blue which follows lower volume existing County or City collector streets. This could be using existing roadways or adjacent pathways constructed on the right - of -way. The third bikeway color is green which is depicting independent pathways such as around Lake Harriet or along Minnehaha Creek. As such, this map constitutes suggested planned routes or corridors that should be considered in developing a County -wide network. The Executive Summary would suggest that Hennepin County is the appropriate level of government to institute a "primary" bicycle transportation system. Staff would recommend that the first six or seven pages of the Executive Summary captures the general concepts. Report/Recommendation Agenda Item VI.E. Page Two Currently, a group of adult bicyclists do conduct rides through Edina that tend to have a starting or ending point west of Lake Harriet. The routing does vary but they travel is the southwest suburbs and back utilizing such streets as W. 44th Street, Brookside Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Gleason Road, McCauley Trail, Valley View Road, Cahill Road, Braemar Boulevard, W. 70th Street (west of 100) and W. 66th Street east of 100). As to the construction of W. 66th Street adjacent to Southdale, the following has occurred since the last discussion on this project at the December Council meeting. City staff has written to Hennepin County and raised the issue of the appropriateness of the bikeway concept. The County staff response is that their long range plans (as evidenced by the preliminary bikeway maps) do still incorporate the idea of a bikeway along the W. 66th Street corridor. After meetings with Southdale officials, City staff believes that Southdale would prefer no road construction project on W. 66th Street that has a bikeway on their side of the roadway. The Southdale officials believe the traffic volumes using that side of the Center entering Southdale are high enough that it is not a good mix of multi -modal uses. They suggest the north side of the street would be more appropriate even though there are more curb cuts. City staff (Parks and Engineering) review would suggest that the bikeway issue at the very least should not be discarded given the type of bikeway users (adults) that exist. Currently, the City has some employees who bike to work except during inclement weather. A perception seems to be that bikeway users would only be younger children and therefore, creating unsafe conditions for those users. The preliminary concepts that have been reviewed seem to merit further consideration. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HENNEPIN CO UNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Traditionally, Hennepin County has had a very limited role in bikeway planning and construction. Bikeways and bicycle movement were considered to be a local concern. Hennepin Parks and local cities have taken the lead in the provision of existing trails and bikeways. However, Hennepin County's Bicycle Transportation Plan supports the consideration of bicyclists' needs on county roads as one means of efficient transportation investment and environmental improvement. Some county roads have been signed and/or striped as bicycle routes by other governments. Bicycle paths have also been proposed for inclusion with new projects along county roads and the county has budgeted funds to help with construction. Maintenance of these facilities has been the responsibility of individual cities. With the addition of this plan, the county will expand its role and consider the designation, construction and maintenance of bicycle facilities. The Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan offers the opportunity to comprehensively integrate county, municipal, park and state bicycle facilities. It provides a unified vision of how to address the transportation needs of bicyclists. The bicycle transportation plan helps guide decisions for accommodating bicycle travel and provides a systematic approach rather than reacting to isolated, case -by -case project needs. The bicycle transportation plan (including text, maps, and cross sections) responds to the existing plans and comments of various parties in the metropolitan area including the Hennepin County Bicycle Advisory. Committee which is appointed by the County Board, the Northwest League of Municipalities, the University of Minnesota, Hennepin Parks, and several cities. A series of newsletters and public meetings provided an opportunity for public review and comment which was also incorporated into the plan. Bicycle transportation plan elements include: • Recommendations for changes to the traditional role of Hennepin County in bicycle planning. A provision to seek public input and participation concerning the role of the county, bicycle transportation plan contents and philosophy. An inventory of existing and proposed bicycle facilities within Hennepin County based on definitions established by the county. Barron Aschman Associates. inc. Exmiuve Summary HENNEPINCOUNTYBICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN wants to have an active role in expanding residents' mobility options and furthering their travel alternatives. • The choice to use a bicycle should be welcomed as a realistic and sensible form of transportation in its own right. Transportation planning should include the bicycle choice, just as it includes other modes such as automobiles, walking and transit. • Hennepin County believes that there is a critical need to establish a safe, convenient bicycle transportation system. • The county is the right entity to help accommodate bicycle transportation by using its extensive roadway rights -of -way, light rail transit corridors, and other railroad or utility corridors. • It is envisioned that an extensive countywide bikeway system will be designed to serve all types of bicyclists regardless of their levels of rider expertise or travel destination. These vision elements are embodied in the remaining sections of this bicycle transportation plan. I GOALS AND The five goals and the associated objectives that follow from the OBJECTIVES vision begin to highlight the priorities of the Bicycle Transportation System: 1) accessibility, 2) support for complementary efforts, including local planning, connections to transit and bicycle safety education, 3) system performance, 4) comfort and security, and 5) integration with planning and development. Goal #1 Expand bicycle accessibility to major and minor activity centers Objectives: • Improved connections to local municipal bikeway trail systems • Extensive system connections to all major and minor activity centers (public facilities, schools and commercial areas) • Accessibility to A (Advanced), B (Basic) and C (Children) bicycle riders within systems that match their desired destinations and riding expertise Barton A:chmanAssociates. Inc. Ezeauive Summery iv rte' HENNEPIN CO UNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN • Improved coordination within and between governmental units • Support for actions that improve complementary recreational travel needs • Consideration of needed right -of -way or easements as part of the platting process for bicycle accommodations TYPES OF The bicycle transportation system will need to be configured to BICYCLISTS' accommodate users of three basic types: • Group A - advanced bicyclists • Group B - basic bicyclists • Group C - children Group A bicyclists are experienced riders, including regular bicycle commuters, messengers and racer/trainers who can operate under most traffic conditions. They want direct access to destinations at maximum speed with minimum delays. Group A bicyclists primarily rely on the road system for routes and value having the right -of -way like other vehicles, but occasionally enjoy trails if they are relatively continuous and not overly crowded. Group B bicyclists are casual or new adult and teenage riders who need comfortable access, preferably by a direct route, on low speed or low traffic volume streets where having the right -of -way as a moving vehicle is not critical. Group B bicyclists are most comfortable on designated bikeways and bicycle trails. Group C bicyclists are pre -teen riders whose roadway use is usually accompanied with a parent. They need access to local schools, libraries, recreation facilities, shopping, or other residential areas. They need separation of bicycles and motor vehicles or access to streets with low vehicle speeds and volumes. Bicyclists' abilities and preferences very considerably within these three groups. Children especially vary according to age and experience with traffic. INVENTORY OF Hennepin County residents currently benefit from a bicycle facility EXISTING BICYCLE network that is contributed to by a wide variety of agencies. In FACILITIES addition to Hennepin County, bicycle facilities are provided by cities, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Mn/DNR), and 4; w Barton:Aschman Associates. Inc. Executive Summary N ;. ; HENNEPIN CO UN77 BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN • Signed and delineated bicycle routes or lanes (on -road) • Intercounty linkages • Multi -use independent corridors whose principal function may be bicycle oriented Not all of the bicycle facilities in Hennepin County meet the above criteria. Concrete sidewalks or narrow bituminous paths were not included in this inventory. Nor were unsigned or non - designated streets included as existing facilities since there are no outward indications to a bicycle rider that these facilities are part of a bikeway system. SYSTEM NEEDS Analysis of the existing bicycle facilities within Hennepin County ANALYSIS identified a number of issues or system inadequacies. These identified deficiencies were addressed as part of the development of the system plan and as part of the establishment of system design guidelines. General system needs include the following: A. Enhanced continuity is needed to connect gaps in the regional system. Major rivers and roadway corridors that restrict bicycle route crossings need to be bridged. Examples of this include: • Independent trails need to be interconnected (the Luce Line from Plymouth to Minneapolis, the Southwest linkage between Cedar Lake and Hennepin Park's LRT Trails, the North Hennepin Trail between French Regional Park and Elm Creek). • Additional intercounty connections are needed within both urban and rural environments. • Infilling of primary routes within municipal systems is needed. • Natural and man-made need to be spanned barriers like rivers and freeways B. Connectivity is missing between local systems and the regional system. Connections between bicycle facilities and transit should be facilitated. Specific examples include: • Local bikeway and trail systems that are largely internal within communities need to be connected to the regional system. • Regional bicycle systems and transit routes need to be connected via park -n -ride, bicycle -n -ride, or transit hubs. �.. Barton Aschman Associates. Inc. Exwjpve Sumeury via a :r ' HENNEPIN COUNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN • Site review design guidelines for handling connections between bikeway facilities and retail, industrial and office space. Typical development guidelines do not cover the problems encountered in obtaining" bicycle access to a development through typical parking lot and site circulation designs. • Conflicts exist between different design standards depending upon their application. These discrepancies can make a significant difference to a bicyclist whether to choose to use the facility or not. For example, curb ramps designed for handicapped access considerations often include a "lip" at the roadway for_. delineation by blind persons and also for drainage considerations. This lip and the resulting jarring it causes to a bicycle rider crossing it discourages use of the connecting path or trail. E. Route Guidance is needed to convey information to bicyclists. Maps, brochures, and other route data is difficult to obtain. Specific areas of need includes: • A comprehensive bicycle facility inventory map should be available to the public. This facility map should be regularly updated. • Route signing, both for route marking and off - system trail blazing, is needed to provide positive guidance to bicyclists who use the system. BICYCLE SYSTEM The selection of corridors that make up the bicycle transportation PLAN system evolved from the initial goals and objectives established for the plan and the need to satisfy the enhanced continuity and connectivity system needs above. To identify the primary system of bicycle routes, the general corridors were overlaid onto the Hennepin County roadway system and appropriate county roads were selected for inclusion in the Bicycle Transportation System. Where county roads were not available or were identified as being inappropriate for bicycle transportation, secondary system routes were identified. Independent trails were included as part of the overall system. The result of the planning process above was a system of primary and secondary bicycle routes and independent trails identified graphically on Figure 5.1. The primary routes (blue) in the system plan were identified as being corridors where the goal of full bicycle accommodation for Barton Rachman Associates. Inc. Executive Summary Example of an independent trail facility (Southwest LRT Trail at CSAH -60, Minnetonka) HENNEPIN CO MY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN Independent trails are popular recreational facilities which can also _ serve a significant role in transportation when they offer an alternative route to destinations of interest to bicyclists. The physical separation from traffic offered by trails is reassuring to Groups B and C bicyclists. They are also popular with some Group A riders at those times during the day when the facility is not crowded with slower bicycle users, pedestrians or other users. The fact that bicycle trails are often in attractive settings increases their appeal to all bicycle users. Independent trails often provide grade separation at major highways and river crossings which is especially desirable for those bicyclists who desire direct, convenient facilities. Hennepin County is endowed with numerous existing and planned independent trails. Additional trail opportunities that use LRT right -of -way and other rail corridors are possible. An important goal of this plan is to support completion of these trails and to provide connections to and between them as needed. Many of the trail corridors provide alignments that radiate from the downtown core, transect the central business district, and continue through mature residential areas outward to the suburban developing fringe. Community access is abundant, as is the opportunity to link with other regional or community bikeways. Bicycle Compatible Roadways are a configuration of on -road space designated for multiple purposes including bicycles. Other uses such as temporary parking for disabled vehicles are typically Barton- Aschman Associates. Inc. Ex=Uve Summary Nuv Example of an off road multi -use path along Vicksburg Lane at 28th Avenue North - Plymouth HENNEPINCOUN YBICYCLETRANSPORTATIONPL4N Basic Roadway accommodations means that due to design and / or right -of -way constraints, bicycles must share road space with motorized traffic. Under this situation, the county routinely removes obstacles and hazards to bicycle travel along the roadway edge. In some cases where adjacent sidewalks and occasional bicycle usage exists, a widened lane may be provided to provide refuge space and vehicle reaction distance. Bicycle usage on basic roadways is not encouraged nor is bicycle route signage included on these types of roads. Basic roadways are the lowest desirable level of accommodation, and they do not meet the standards necessary for inclusion into the primary or secondary county bicycle systems. Many existing urban and rural roadways are currently basic roadways with little special provision for bicycles. The bicycle transportation plan has designated a number of its current basic roadways as part of the system plan. Parallel facilities through public lands or on adjacent city streets may need to be utilized in the cases where the existing constraints prohibit adding bicycle accommodations to basic roadways. Barton Aschman Associates. Inc. F.x=mve Sumnury xvi HENNEPIN CO UNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN • Minnesota State Aid Design Manual - Mn/DOT State Aid Office, December 28, 1992 • Design Standards for Off-Road Bike Paths - Mn/DOT, January 11, 1995 Design Guidelines are references which include excellent advice on recommended configurations and design elements. These sources do not require the same strict interpretation of the design _. standards above. However, significant deviations from these guidelines need to be well researched and justified. Some guidelines which are typically used in Minnesota for bicycle design are: • Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), August 1991 _ • A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO,1990 • Road Design Manual - Mn/DOT, January 31,1982 • Minnesota State Aid Proposed Rules, Minimum Bicycle Path Standards - Proposed State Statutes 8820.9995, June 30, 1995 • Bikeway Design Manual - Mn/DOT, February 8, 1983 • Minnesota -Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines (Draft) - Mn/DOT Bicycle Planning Section, May 15,1995 • Recommended Urban Landscape / Streetscape Guidelines - Hennepin County, April 3, 1995 • Policy for Right -of -Way Acquisition and or Dedication on Hennepin County Roadways - Hennepin County, January 17,1979 Other additional guideline resources were consulted as part of the development of the bicycle transportation plan: • National Bicycling and Walking Study (including individual Case Studies 1 -24) - Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FHWA -PD -94 =023 Barron Aschman Associates. Inc. Executive Summary xvui a 1 01 2 LANE RURAL H1NCilON aJLU COl1ECTOR A YNNOp ARTERIALS RIW :yo- 4# PH Tdae • Io oa ADT � LINE s0' COMPATIBLE, ROADWAY CURRENT ; TYPICAL DESIGN DRJVNGLANE e►DUtDER , aR FULL ACCOMMODATION D ° o 04 Ins" CL REACTION —J - "aLoft DISTANCE S� �S�L � _ ROUIOED PEAT WUTCO am BOTTOM 30' a STATE AND OBSTACLE FREE ZONE ADM OROUND UTLMES AND EDGE OF FIXED OBJECTS mm LM[ RIW LINE NOTE: OBIEASIONS SIMN FOR SIDE SLOPES AND DITCH BOTTOM ARE LLUSTATIVE ONLY MSTN ACTUAL PROJECT OOENSDNSCALCULATED RASED ON HELD COIORDNS AND DRAINAGE DESKK EASEMENT LINE 12.S a' S irl 10' Irl DISTANCE FOUNDED PERMIIJ CDCD DITCH BOTTOM NT SUN AD OS EDGE OF ORNM LANE E SOD: RATM BRO CLENI ZONES J ALTERNATE LOCATONSFOR ABOVEGROUND FRD OBIS FIGURE 6.1 a ti 0 0 a a a R a n NYl g:1 2 LANE URBAN 2 -WAY LEFT TURN LANE SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FRNCTNON CLASS: COLLECTOR • VIM ARTERIALS Fvw FML MIT VOLIBES: SAW - 15,000 ADT C{• SPEED: 30.35 MM LINE 44' COMPATIBLE ROADWAY °' °' 12' e r �a ° CURRENT TYPICAL VA DESIGN CENTER 7-WAY ORNM LAZE '&U LM CURS 6 ourrm \ LEFT TURN LANE `SIGNS, ABOVE OROILNO MITES OPERATIONAL AND FM OBJECTS CLEAR ZONE ww C LINE Z 52' n O cz FULL 1r r I r Irl I°' i r 1 5' n ACCOMODATION �; e . 1J._ 61016 CENTER 3-WAY Omm LAN! SNOULDEII WEE PQN ABOYE OROUID ITTTLTTTES LEFT TURN LANE LCURS 5 OUITEA_ BIKE AND FI ED OBJECTS CLEAR ZONES O p ( ERATION Q D U CL CLEAR 2011E E 1/1519° - RGURE °.3 O n f%1 �.I 4 LANE URBAN DIVIDED PTITIctm aAn WW R ARIEA u PRU AOT VMUEfi I=. a" AOT SPEED: Z! • W Uhl BASIC ROADWAY s' CURRENT TYPICAL DESIGN G1I�L COMPATIBLE ROADWAY Fi MULTI -USE PATH ADJACENT TO ROADWAY d FULL ACCOMMODATION HIM L` 53' LINE LEFT TURN M OWN LAW - OMNNOLANE :— CUR! S GURER ABOVE OROUMD UTU M OPMTKWAL AND FM OBJECTS CLEAR ZONE RNV Lary rum HER OUTER - DISNNO LANE OMYRIIG IANE ORNNG lAN! OPERATIONAL Glp, ABOY! GIIDIAm UTSTlS AM ME0 OSECTS CLEAR ZONEE CUNB wrrN EYIENDEO OUTTER OR SNOULDEJR RN �. UNE_ DM IN DMVINOLATE OMMLATE asn nNw� VIER OUTER ORIM LANE oRRTNO LANE oRIVNO LANE U R ROAOMiAYCEME1llE M NOT THE SAYE AB TTE YEOIAN CEMNr1E SHOE IMSIIOBM ifism aecrR011Ogllr1TrGLANE9INGTLIMNLJBE) aDNB PATH BSUE CLEEM ZONES CURB A GUTTER IRATIMM CLEAR ZONE r RNONS BOE PAN SSG! CLEAR ZONES N LE ` EARZO CL NE U W" EZTEMED ER OR SNOW" ABOVE GROU D URTES AND FMM OBJECT'S RM %S b 0 n n ABOVE GROUND tnLffin a' AMRMOOBJECTS 0 FIGURE 63 Z HENNEPIN CO UNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN POLICY To implement the bicycle transportation plan, revisions. it R.ECOAMN- refinements and additions are proposed to the current Department DATIONS of Public Works policies which affect bicycle accommodations. Bicycle Route Signing The responsibilities for bicycle route signing on county roadways belongs with the Department of Public Works. Hennepin County will sign a bicycle route on roadway shoulders adjacent to a county road when: • The roadway segment is part of the system plan shown in Figure 5.1 • The roadway and shoulder design meets the design guidelines for a bicycle compatible roadway The roadway segment provides a logical connection between bicycle origins and destinations or to a municipal bikeway or regional trail system. The signing of short, isolated 1 -2 block segments will be avoided so that continuous, predictable routing is provided. The signing of other segments of the county roadway system will be considered if such segments are part of a city bicycle system, a specific- request (resolution) is received from the city to sign the route, and if the route design meets the necessary design guidelines. Bicycle route signing will be evaluated as part of the project development process for all county pavement maintenance, reconstruction, or new roadway construction projects. One of the first actions after the adoption of this bicycle plan will be the evaluation and signing of the existing county roadway system consistent with these policies. Right -of -way Acquisition This policy establishes the guidelines for the provision of right - of -way for acquisition on capital improvement projects and for the dedication on. present or proposed Hennepin County roadways. The right -of -way dimension widths are taken from the typical roadway sections of Figures 6.1 to 6.6 rounded to the Barton- Aschman Associates. Inc. Euattive Sunny Mi HENNEPINCOUNTYBICYCLE TRANSPOR TA TION PLAN TABLE 7.3 FUNDING PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES L Multi -use paths on the Bicycle System Plan Element Participation City / County Discussion / Comments R/W Funding 50%/50% . Would apply regardless of whether the bikeway is part of a roadway or if the project is only for the bikeway. 100% City • If R/W initially requested by County in plat review process was declined by city Construction 50%/50% • Would apply regardless of whether the bikeway is part of a roadway or if the project is only for the bikeway. Maintenance 100% City Reconstruction 100% County . Only applies to areas disturbed by county roadway projects Signing 50%/50% • Only applies to uniform signing H. On -Road facilities on the Bicycle System Plan Participation Element City /County Discussion / Comments R/W Funding 50%/50% • Would apply regardless of whether the bikeway is part of a roadway or if the project is only for the bikeway. 100% city • If R/W initially requested by County in plat review process was declined by City Construction 100% County • Shoulders in urban or rural areas 50%/50% . Dedicated bike lanes Maintenance 100% County Reconstruction 100% County Signing 100% County . Applies to uniform signing of bicycle routes Barton Aschman Associates, lnc. Executive Summary yijj 61 Its Mtka A,lib t. N o Ake st Ho lei S1. f moist U 3 �� €I2 b '�'" r� ✓� Q 71h I • JOIN S!. rrrar I 38th SL 33 J E. st �y W Jim dt 3eM U ,n u E. 9eet St. S� `�,• � �,rs� W 39tlt �k�i ST c L ndale y 152 1 5. t �` L 1 7 `° �` 4 t 42nd 42 3 Meador j Lake ;y ook Laica J-4nd Lake ,' r `k E. . Hiaw he 20 = c I Ale v x L Intw6wh•n Blvd d W. Sdh St E tU \ I v �n1[r(w A( 'JV. o • a W. F81h s�[ �W, rjnry. ` � To t W. 5Ah t tsrn Rd E ` L I^t°^ 17 W. eah s,.� 121 E. st % 3� awd ,�j 5 t3tst sc C�te� Mother >o 82nd 62 Crop own Vcl 8i1� 1 ake SL Mie \N. eae+ 5 nth s, � i Laxe A i \ Ro �� w. ? 53 eta►, E. Wj 1. . 53 I n alit as e s �i t7 100 Lakrt' a °" E v Cornelia z Richf i d W. ?9th St. �81ymt w rt>th st - Lake 212 v ° — - Laifa - a E 7ft st ir: c D E. 7*4rd �,. (� ttivp Lake i - 0 46 -d 169 DervW Hil Rd ).,. \r trr;� • 5 !] c (`� S1 inn is-st Y 39 (� /}�' 3 r VV h °� F -Nh St Internationallvrpor fit• South ° m` F�IV, t W. 7n, Sc s' 444 /� U#r• a W. 78ttr 51 �' •L E MIN , �f 169 494 5 r • ° Miles w �a st t e, i 1 in 169 �vghwoou O r s r 8 E. aAa, st N 212 ,qn+«, ,reek 9 Ra•d J 1 W. 86th St. � t � W QMh St. I I I E e6th St q� �� �iaktA� �`� *• ` �r'ybR yy � ` i �,,, Y52 35 Mtlg ? Hyland ° ° �t'�w•1 Lae 28 s W x r �v�ct i� 34 �e eotn st. 32 e eom Bushy � 1 � Lak n �` LeliC Lake « '1¢j 5 a1 Ox o S r _ W. BAth > 9 Q w t)Mh tit. t?rptr St d �b %! st z :� Meaif • 9 �� 18 3 _ Bloomington it q, W rim st 6 k • W oath SL Center Road I C'. 8 !f, ,a 'Y' ne n� , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # vi. F. FROM: Francis HoffmaK_ ;�J El Consent City Engineer Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 February, 1996 ❑ To Council SUBJECT: Annual Bridge Certification Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Review report. Info /Background: The City Engineer is required to have all City bridges and culverts of a certain size to be inspected and certify to the State that the inspections were completed. There are twenty -five bridges and culverts that currently are inspected annually. One structure, the Soo Line Bridge over W. 44th Street is not owned by the City, but the State requires the City to inspect it because it is over a City street. In the past, staff has written to both the State officials and railroad officials regarding this structure. It is an old structure that the railroad officially maintains that it is adequate for rail use. Staff continues to suggest that additional maintenance work should be done to prolong the life of the structure. Additionally, the State now allows bridges to be inspected every second year instead of annually. Staff believes that fourteen structures (bridges and culverts) meet the State criteria for every other year official inspection. Staff has submitted the list for these structures but would continue to informally review all structures annually. The reason for the every other year official inspections is to reduce inspection costs and paperwork when it is obviously a structure which is neweror type (culvert) that simply would not have significant deterioration occurring annually. Finally, two structures of the twenty -five need to be replaced or refurbished in the next few years. The Browndale bridge currently has a weight restriction and is in need of refurbishing and reconstruction. Staff has started preliminary engineering work on the Browndale bridge. Also, the W. 56th Street bridge over Minnehaha Creek should be scheduled for refurbishing or replacement as soon as the Browndale bridge is completed. Staff would seek State bridge bonding funds for both since neither bridge is on a street which is state aid eligible. PKINS I i' r m x "off ,]N All T1 16H '2t R21■ 17118 1 Lake 6LViJP111'1 V i V1I ST. LOUIS PAR[ W. 60th zl 615 T2TM R24■ i �a T25R 8246 1 � ' / 16 11 'h ST. T 48th MINNEAPOLIS' I ST. TI ITN R26\ un 1 e 20 92323 .. s v Q p �ITSm ST. O "1 TO: Ken Rosland FROM: Julie Jones DATE: February 15, 1996 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION SUBJECT: 1995 Year End Recycling Report Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI. G. Consent 0 Information Only F1 Submit the attached report regarding 1995- recycling activities to the City Council for their information. No action necessary. Background Information: Cities within Hennepin County are required to compile certain information regarding recycling levels twice a year. This report is a summary of the 1995 recycling statistics gathered for the year end County report. This report was presented to the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission at their February 15 meeting. Mgr. Recommends F� To HRA ElTo Council Action Motion Resolution 0 Ordinance ElDiscussion Submit the attached report regarding 1995- recycling activities to the City Council for their information. No action necessary. Background Information: Cities within Hennepin County are required to compile certain information regarding recycling levels twice a year. This report is a summary of the 1995 recycling statistics gathered for the year end County report. This report was presented to the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission at their February 15 meeting. EDINA RECYCLING 1995 REPORT Recycling Tonnages In 1995, Edina residents recycled 6,188 tons of materials, which is a slight increase above the previous year. There was a 3% increase in Edina homeowners recycling levels through the City program currently serviced by BFI. However, there was a decrease in reported apartment recycling tonnages, affecting the City's overall recycling rate. Without including yard waste collected at the curb by the garbage haulers, Edina homeowners recycled EDINA RECYCLING Monthly Totals 1991 -1995 1991 $- 1992 --a- 1993 1994 1995 'on average 723 pounds per, household in 1995, which equals 30% of their waste. When the 4222 tons of yard waste collected is added, the waste abatement percentage totals 50.5 %. These figures do not include appliance recycling amounts, which are reported separately to Hennepin County by appliance recycling companies. Recycling program participation continues to be high. Most Edina homeowners continue to use the service weekly. In 1995, the average weekly set out rate was 67.5 %. The highest participation was during August, when 76.1% of potential customers participated weekly. Using a standard multiplier, we can estimate that our monthly participation rate is 88 %. Multi - family Recycling Due to unknown factors, multi - family recycling levels decreased 7% in 1995 from the previous year. Apartment owners and managers are currently being questioned to see if they can explain the 1995 decrease. The recycling collectors questioned have been unable to explain the decrease. Multi- family recycled weights per household were 282 pounds per year, which is only 39% as much as the single family household average. However, multi- family recycling levels per household will always be less than that of single- family homes due to a variety of factors, primarily average smaller household sizes. After mid -year reports showed multi -family recycling levels falling short of 1994 numbers, all apartment and condominium managers were sent a letter from the Recycling Coordinator. They were encouraged to correct any problems with their recycling collections and to add other paper types to their program since paper prices were high at the time, making collection fees lower than ever before. One condominium manager responded by starting a household-paper collection system with Waldorf Corporation. Now they are making money, based on current scale prices, for a mixture of newspaper, paper bags, boxboard, corrugated cardboard and mixed mail. Previously, they had paid for just newspapers to be collected. Special attention will be focused on apartment recycling programs this spring in an attempt to increase 1996 recycling levels. Markets Market prices for post - consumer paper continued to be high until about mid- year, when mills became over - supplied with old stock. The result was dropping corrugated prices continually until the end of the year. Paper prices are still slightly higher than this time last year. Market prices for other recycables have not changed much in the past year, with plastics continuing to be the most difficult item to market. Recyclables Collected 1995 GLASS (21.29) CARDBOARD (2.291 PLASTIC (3.39) METAL (10.29) PHONE BOOKS (0.119 0.3961 As can be seen from the above pie chart, paper items continue to make up a majority of the material collected in the city recycling program. Due to the temporarily high prices for paper, BFI voluntarily reduced the City's monthly recycling bills. The total annual savings for 1995 was $18,426.52, which remains in the recycling enterprise fund. BFI does not expect market prices to be high enough in 1996 to prompt rebates again. County Funding Hennepin County will be continuing to pass through SCORE funds to municipalities in 1996. SCORE funds are state sales tax dollars designated for subsidizing recycling programs. Funding levels are expected to remain close to last year's level, which equalled about $39 per household per month. Program Improvements Due to interest from the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission to add boxboard to the Edina recycling program, several discussions were held with BFI representatives to discuss the feasibility of adding this material to the program. Boxboard, the type of material that cereal boxes are made from, has been added to many other metro area residential recycling programs. However, BFI is not willing to add this material to the program until more markets are available. The only regional market requires that the boxboard be mixed with newspaper, which would hinder BFI's ability to obtain maximum prices for clean newspaper at other paper mills. BFI has indicated that they will be - willing to add boxboard to the Edina program if market demand for boxboard improves or when they expand their sorting space capacity in two years. The next material - likely to be added to our list of recyclables is textiles, which residential garbage sampling tests have shown to be the-next predominant item in the waste stream that could be recycled. The possibility of allowing residents to commingle paper grades together has also been discussed with BFI. Since we already collect eight materials in a container designed for three bags, there is concern that adding another material to the program would be unacceptable unless some commingling could be conducted by the residents. It appears that this will be prohibitive for the remaining term of our contract with BFI since they do not have the sorting capacity at either of their current facilities. During the past year, residents have voiced more interest in adding other types of plastics to -the program than any other item. However, plastics markets are not expected to expand. Education about the recycling program is still very important since some residents are unaware that mixed mail and telephone books are recyclable. We plan to incorporate information about the recycling program into the new utility billing system, an inexpensive advertising option now available to us. EDINA RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING TONNAGE 1995 1995 SOURCE NEWSPR MAGZ CORG PH BK +MX ML GLASS METAL PLSTC TOTAL ABATE SETOUT *PAFCP' JAN Single fam 248.30 10.88 9.24 1.67 10-43 89.12 38.94 15.03 423.61 24.7% 65.3% 84. Mufti -unit 46.16 0.00 6.43 0.00 0.97 24.32 5.05 2.20 85.13 5.0% Total 294.46 10.88 15.67 1.67 11.40 113.44 43.99 17.23 508.74 29.6% FEB Single fam 218.01 9.46 8.32 9.25 7.30 73.76 31.31 13.36 370.77 21.6% 63.9% 83.1% Mufti -unit 40.86 0.00 5.80 0.00 0.00 21.83 4.58 1.98_ 75.05 4.4 %_ Total 258.87 9.46 14.12 9.25 7.30 95.59 35.89 15.34 445.82 26.0% MAR Single fam 242.42 8.59 8.88 1.66 7.43 78.92 34.13 14.63 396.66 23.1% 65.0% 84.5% Mufti -unit 48.64 0.00 6.91 0.60 0.79 24.88 5.16 2.40 89.37 5.2% Total 291.06 8.59 15.79 2.26 8.22 103.80 39.29 17.03 486.03 28.3% APR Single fam 249.63 9.09 9.11 0.76 5.67 82.80 35.56 15.00 407.62 23.7% 68.8% 89.4% Multi -unit 48.53 0.00 7.44 0.00 0.00 21.53 4.53 2.03 84.06 4.9% Total 298.16 9.09 16.55 0.76 5.67 104.33 40.09 17.03 491.68 28.6% MAY Single fam 260.95 7.06 16.6 4.96 8.45 88.54 61.45 7.34 455.35 26.5% 60.1% 78.1% Multi -unit 54.60 0.00 8.31 0.00 0.00 23.26 5.23 2.32 93.72 5.5% Total 315.55 7.06 24.91 4.96 8.45 111.80 66.68 9.66 549.07 32.0% JUN Single fam 259.34 7.38 16.58 4.91 9.16 87.66 60.83 7.52 453.38 26.4% 68.3% 88.8% Multi -unit 50.60 0.00 7.76 0.00 1.29 23.73 5.60 2.46 91.43 5.3% Total 309.94 7.38 24.34 4.91 10.45 111.39 66.43 9.98 544.81 31.7% JUL Single fam 220.29 5.85 4.70 1.44 6.21 85.36 39.42 14.01 377.27 22.0% 63.9% 9, Mufti -unit 52.54 0.00 6.89 0.00 0.00 21.12 4.81 2.00 87.35 5.1% Total 272.83 5.85 11.59 1.44 6.21 106.47 44.23 16.01 464.62 27.1% AUG Single fam 264.70 6.28 6.02 1.50 6.14 107.39 47.23 16.01 455.27 26.5% 76.1% 98.9% Multi -unit 49.48 0.00 6.92 0.00 0.00 21.45 5.00 1.14 83.99 4.9% Total 314.18 6.28 12.94 1.50 6.14 128.84 52.23 17.15 539.26 31.4% SEP Single fam 242.52 5.31 5.88 2.01 6.87 93.38 44.41 14.79 415.17 24.2% 68.7% 89.3% Mufti -unit 50.46 0.00 7.94 0.00 0.00 21.11 4.96 1.10 85.56 5.0% Total 292.98 5.31 13.81 2.01 6.87 114.48 49.37 15.89 500.73 29.2% OCT Single fam 274.01 5.24 6.55 0.87 4.53 102.26 43.65 16.55 453.67 26.4% 69.6% 90.5% Multi -unit 56.58 0.00 7.75 0.00 0.00 23.14 5.33 1.38 94.17 5.5% Total 330.59 5.24 14.29 0.87 4.53 125.40 48.98 17.93 547.84 31.9% NOV Single fam 286.49 6.18 9.69 0.79 6.36 98.86 42.11 17.88 468.36 27.3% 69.1% 89.8% Mufti -unit 54.88 0.00 6.94 0.00 0.00 22.58 4.79 1.17 1 90.36 5.3% Total 341.37 6.18 16.63 0.79 6.36 121.43 46.90 19.05 558.72 32.5% DEC Single fam 270.64 5.23 10.19 1.49 4.20 95.28 40.72 15.40 443.16 25.8% 71.1% 92.4% Mufti -unft 73.78 0.00 7.13 0.00 0.00 20.85 4.28 1.05 107.09 6.2% Total 344.42 5.23 17.32 1.49 4.20 116.13 45.00 16.45 550.25 32.0% NEWSPR MAGZ CORG PH BK +MX ML GLASS METAL PLSTC TOTAL Single fam 3037.29 86.56 111.76 31.31 82.76 1083.32 519.76 167.52 5120.27 24.9% 1995 Multi -unit 627.12 0.00 86.21 0.60 3.05 269.79 59.31 21.22 1067.29 5.2% +Mixed Mail includes city hall office paper Y1 COUNCIL CHEF,., REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:310 AM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163282 02/20/96 $447.78 3M CO LETTERING TP46179 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5420 < *> $447.78* 163283 02/20/96 $13.50 A -Z RENTAL RENTAL -TILE ROLLER C7620201 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6014 < *> $13.50* 163284 02/20/96 $1,215.00 AAA 90 VEHICLES LICENSE T 020296 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS - < *> $1,215.00* 163285 02/20/96 $202.50 AAA LICENSE TABS FOR 15 T 020296 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $202.50* 163286 02/20/96 $408.50 AAA INSPECTION FEES / LICEN 020296 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $408.50* 163287 02/20/96 $600.00 ABA ABA AFFLIATION FEE 021396 EDINA ATHLETIC DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $600.00* 163288 02/20/96 $42.00 ABDELLA, PAUL AC INSTRUCTOR 021396 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $42.00* 163289 02/20/96 $13.45 ACTION MESSENGER MESSENGER SERVICE 00180926 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $13.45* 163290 02/20/96 $49.50 AEC ENG /DESIGNERS PROF ENG 13648 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF,SERVICES < *> $49.50* 163291 02/20/96 $500.00 AHLSTROM, BOB CONSULTING SERVICES /G 020996 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP < *> $500.00* 163292 02/20/96 $51.00 AHMAD, AMINA CLASS REFUND 013196 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $51.00* 163293 02/20/96 $3.90 ALL FIRE TEST INC SEALS /TAX .009327. FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5838 02/20/96 $45.17 ALL FIRE TEST INC COMPARTMENT SEALS 009482 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5838 < *> $49.07* 163294 02/20/96 $225.32 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 25316 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5656 02/20/96 $242.82 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 25510 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5787 < *> $468.14* 163295 02/20/96 $97.00 AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD, T ADVERTISING OTHER 2214 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 6351 < *> $97.00* 163296 02/20/96 $225.14 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $39.32 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 GRILL LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $83.64 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $350.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $13.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $42.84 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 013196 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $46.51 AMERICAN.LINEN LAUNDRY 013196. VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY < *> $801.47* 163297 02/20/96 $2,061.42 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER 91869801 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 6020 < *> $2,061.42* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163298 02/20/96 $2.00 ANDERSON, JULIE OVERPAYMENT /COACH PIT 021296 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $2.00* 163299 02/20/96 $1,032.18 ASHWORTH INC COST OF GOODS -PRO S 114928 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4178 02/20/96 $334.27 ASHWORTH INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 115443 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4178 02/20/96 $428.38 ASHWORTH INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 116510 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 4178 02/20/96 $355.85 ASHWORTH INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 116612 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4178 < *> $2,150.68* 163300 02/20/96 $33.65 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. RIVET 49481 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS - 5133 02/20/96 $39.94 ASPEN. EQUIPMENT CO. REPAIR PARTS 66971 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 5664 < *> $73.59* 163301 02/20/96 $185.50 ASPLUND COFFEE COST-OF GOODS SOLD 207997 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4774 < *> $185.50* 163302 02/20/96 $200.00 ASSOCIATION OF GOLF MERC MEMBERSHIP IN MERCH A 021396 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $200.00* 163303 02/20/96 $1,398.02 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP ENGINE REPAIR C10897 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5168 < *> $1,398.02* 163304 02/20/96 $36.31 AT & T TELEPHONE 013196 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $36.31* 163305 02/20/96 $334.83 AT & T PHONE .30924919 ART CENTER ADM.GENERAL SUPPLI 5221 < *> $334.83* 163306 02/20/96 $61.66 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONE 012996 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 6083 02/20/96 $14.27 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONE 012996 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 6084 02/20/96 $125.14 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE BILL 012996 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE < *> $201.07* 163307 02/20/96 $44.32 AT &T TELEPHONE 012496 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $44.32* 163308 02/20/96 $13.23 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 013196/G TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 5662 02/20/96 $4.46 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 013196/P ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $33.65 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY TOOLS 013196/P PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 02/20/96 $142.69 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY ACCESSORIES 013196/P EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 02/20/96 $160.52 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 013196/P EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $1,080.30 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 013196/P EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $1,434.85* 163309 02/20/96 $320.00 AXLE & SPINDLE REPAIR IN REPAIR SPINDLE 3896 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6055 < *> $320.00* 163310 02/20/96 $100.00 BACVA HOUSING UNIT ADVANCE FOR HOTEL FOR 020896 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 163311 02/20/96 $113.89 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. FURNACE PARTS 48 PUMP 360949. BUILDINGS REPAIR PARTS 5415 02/20/96 $227.78 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. FURNACE COIL 361112. DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS- 5415 02/20/96 $146.20 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. FURNACE ASSEM 361817. DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5415 < *> $487.87* I COUNCIL CHEF REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163312 02/20/96 $6.93 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 021396 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $21.18 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH_ GENERAL SUPPLIES 021396 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $12.74 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 021396 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $21.00 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 021396 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS 02/20/96 $38.00 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH POSTAGE 021396 ED ADMINISTRAT POSTAGE < *> $99.85* 163313 02/20/96 $30.00 BARR, BRENDA REFUND COACH PITCH 020696 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $30.00* 163314 02/20/96 $216.86 BAUER BUILT INC LAMP 393639 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5124 < *> $216.86* 163315 02/20/96 $40.00 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB CONT ED /POLICE R0124962 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 02/20/96 $40.00 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB CONT ED /POLICE R0131962 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $80.00* 163316 02/20/96 $181.25 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC CHECK /REPAIR 5 WALKI 75472 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6259 02/20/96 $135.67 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC REPAIR WALKIE TALKIES 75675 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6258 < *> $316.92* 163317 02/20/96 $57.46 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT PAINT 22126. ED BUILDING & PAINT 5101 02/20/96 $342.66 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT REPAIR 022582 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 5826 02/20/96 $349.88 BECKER ARENA PRODUCT REPAIR 022594 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 5880 < *> $750.00* 163318 02/20/96 $84.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 88243 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 -$2.04 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 227306 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $108.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89364 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $10.41 BELLBOY CORPORATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 227638 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $34.80 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 227638 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $126.05 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 227664 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 - $30.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89342 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $36.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89401 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $367.22* 163319 02/20/96 $214.20 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 020896/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/20/96 $405.20 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 020896/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/20/96 $394.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 020896/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $1,013.40* 163320 02/20/96 $31.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3260800 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $54.53 BERTELSON BROS. INC. HOLDER /PROTECTOR 3289800 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5881 02/20/96 $39.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MARKERS 3290260 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $86.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3292070 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 6006 02/20/96 $4.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3256192 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $15.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3276601 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 02/20/96 $5.33 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3299450 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 02/20/96 $10.55 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3310800 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 6280 02/20/96 $39.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3310800 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 6280 02/20/96 $296.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3310800 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 6280 02/20/96 $1.26 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3310800 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 6280 02/20/96 $125.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3319830 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $97.61 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3331370 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 6358 < *> $807.70* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163321 02/20/96 $159.32 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. REMODELING 00501279 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 6268 02/20/96 $438.15 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. REMODELING 28101264 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 6316 < *> $597.47* 163322 02/20/96 $41.80 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF KEYS 28103 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5737 02/20/96 $171.25 -BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF LOCKS 28765 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 6059 02/20/96 $85.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF REPAIR DOOR LOCKS 029032 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 6352 < *> $298.05* 163323 02/20/96 $94.10 BEST MAID COOKIE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD 2546 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4237 < *> $94.10* 163324 02/20/96 $5,489.91 BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 013196 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES < *> $5,489.91* 163325 02/20/96 $65.26 BIFFS INC RESTROOM RENTAL BI065856 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 6202 02/20/96 $85.26 BIFFS INC RESTROOM RENTAL BI065857 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 6202 < *> $150.52* 163326 02/20/96 $25.00 BLAYLOCK PLUMBING PLUMBING REG FEE 020596 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERMI < *> $25.00* 163327 02/20/96 $180.00 BLOOMINGTON LINOLEUM & C FLOOR TILE 13374 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 6027 < *> $180.00* 163328 02/20/96 - $29.40 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 7180CM POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 02/20/96 $61.25 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC COST OF GOODS.SOLD 14788 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4776 < *> $31.85* 163329 02/20/96 $64.50 BOHN, SANDRA SKATING CLASS REFUND 020596 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER < *> $64.50* 163330 02/20/96 $41.79 BOLKS, JEFFREY GENERAL SUPPLIES -POLI 020196 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $41.79* 163331 02/20/96 $259.89 BOYER TRUCKS FRONT HUB 460564 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $207.25 BOYER TRUCKS PLATE 461734 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5931 02/20/96 $17.51 BOYER TRUCKS PLUG 461903 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5936 02/20/96 $88.82 BOYER TRUCKS SEAT 461781 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5931 02/20/96 - $259.89 BOYER TRUCKS CREDIT 460564 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5897 02/20/96 $46.07 BOYER TRUCKS CABLE 463047 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6061 02/20/96 $309.17 BOYER TRUCKS MUFFLER /CLAMP .463220 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6065 02/20/96 $113.96 BOYER TRUCKS HOSE 463558 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6082 02/20/96 $1.43 BOYER TRUCKS SLEEVE 463682 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6082 < *> $784.21* 163332 02/20/96 $116.48 BRASK, JAY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 020196 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $116.48* 163333 02/20/96 $79.00 BUROW, MARY LOU CLASS REFUND 020596 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $79.00* 163334 02/20/96 $78.88 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 622075 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $78.88* COUNCIL .iL — REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163335 02/20/96 $400.00 CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING 2 USED "CUSHMAN'S -PART 2006 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 6195 < *> $400.00* 163336 02/20/96 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 021396 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $50.00* 163337 02/20/96 $39.00 CAREER TRACK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 00670178 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $39.00* 163338 02/20/96 $4,695.00 CASWELL INTERNL CORP GUN RANGE BACKSTOP RE 032352 PARK C.I.P. CIP 5568 < *> $4,695.00* 163339 02/20/96 $407.75 CATCO KIT /AUTO SLACK 396019 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5694 02/20/96 $148.63 CATCO VALVE 396547 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5738 02/20/96 $152.27 CATCO BEARING /WRENCH 396946 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5907 02/20/96 $104.32 CATCO TOOL 719634 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5907 02/20/96 $278.81 CATCO PART 397033 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5918 02/20/96 $202.56 CATCO CARTRIDGE /KIT 397645 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6068 < *> $1,294.34* 163340 02/20/96 - $86.58 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS CREDIT 02278837 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE 02/20/96 $7.76 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS COPY MACHINE COPIES 02282414 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE 5258 02/20/96 $139.63 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS COPY MACHINE LEASE 2282671 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE 5258 < *> $60.81* 163341 02/20/96 $363.60 CENTRAIRIE INC MISC PARTS 98073 VERNON OCCUPAN REPAIR PARTS 5911 < *> $363.60* 163342 02/20/96 $69.96 CERTIFIED POWER TRAIN RETUBE SHAFT 164147 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6209 < *> $69.96* 163343 02/20/96 $156.00 CHAOUCH, HABIB SOCCER REF 5 GAMES 013096 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $144.00 CHAOUCH, HABIB SOCCER -REF ADMIN 36 G 013096 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $24.00 CHAOUCH,'HABIB SOCCER REF 2 GAMES 020996 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $104.00 CHAOUCH, HABIB ADMIN SOCCER REF'S 21 020996 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $428.00* 163344 02/20/96 $664.00 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER COST OF GOODS - PRO S 35557 PRO SHOP COST'OF GDS -PR 5966 < *> $664.00* 163345 02/20/96 $40.00 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATI ANNUAL DUES /F. HOFFMA 020196 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $40.00* 163346 02/20/96 $100.00 CITY OF EDINA /CENTENNIAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1427 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 163347 02/20/96 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 79833 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 02/20/96 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 79834 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS 02/20/96 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 79835 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS < *> $47.13* 163348 02/20/96 $295.50 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP AIR TANK MAINT 23422 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT < *> $295.50* 163349 02/20/96 $88.85 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06084577 SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163349 02/20/96 $56.85 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06105570 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $145.70* 163350 02/20/96 $416.20 COLE PUBLICATIONS BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 021296 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> $416.20* 163351 02/20/96 $547.50 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT MAINT AGREE- COMPRESSO 4.1505 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT < *> $547.50* 163352 02/20/96 $200.25 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE DATA PROCESSING, 767496 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 6147 02/20/96 $19.17 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE GENERAL SUPPLIES 767792 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 6166 02/20/96 $104.91 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE MODEM /CASE 768283 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 6179 02/20/96 $37.28 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE MODEM /CASE 768283 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 6179 < *> $361.61* 163353 02/20/96 $15.00 CONNECT INC ICHIEFS CONNECTION 95122460 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 7421 < *> $15.00* 163354 02/20/96 $251.22 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS HARD HATS 83055700 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5903 < *> $251.22* 163355 02/20/96 $118.05 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 20217 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI 5217 02/20/96 $168.70 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 20217 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5217 < *> $286.75* 163356 02/20/96 $62.89 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. BLUELINE PAPER 0009527 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 6144 02/20/96 $38.51 COPY.EQUIPMENT INC. SPEC BOOK CLEAR COVER 0009931 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI. 6181 < *> $101.40* 163357 02/20/96 $69.19 CORNER MARKING CO SIGNAGE 24583 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 5583 < *> $69.19* — 163358 02/20/96 $4,700.00 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SER PROF SERVICES 013196 HUMAN RELATION PROF SERVICES < *> $4,700.00* 163359 02/20/96 $13,435.00 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF T OVERHEAD DOOR REPLACE 47302 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACEM P5059 02/20/96 $5,400.00 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF T OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIR 47481 FIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLACEM P5059 < *> $18,835.00* 163360 02/20/96 $622.74 CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S CC822190 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3589 02/20/96 $834.96 CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S CC822191 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3589 02/20/96 $1,374.45 CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S CC822192 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3589 < *> $2,832.15* 163361 02/20/96 $239.00 CROWN PLASTIC REPAIR 40277 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 5827 < *> $239.00* 163362 02/20/96 $29.90 CULLIGAN SOFT WATER SERVICE 013196, LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES < *> $29.90* 163363 02/20/96 $264.35 CURTIS 1000 ENVELOPES 46329010 CENT SVC .GENER GENERAL SUPPLI P6346 < *> $264.35* 163364 02/20/96 $40.00 D.C. HEY,CO. COPY MACHINE 602082 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $40.00* COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163365 02/20/96 $55.38 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN FLASHLITE 194050 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 6036 02/20/96 $936.00 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN GLOVES (OSHA) 194622 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 5845 < *> $991.38* 163366 02/20/96 $23.00 DAYSTARTER BATTERIES 13443 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5930 < *> $23.00* 163367 02/20/96 $38.35. DAYTIMERS DAYTIMER 21149250 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 5627 02/20/96 $58.75 DAYTIMERS DAYTIMER 21473111 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 5820 < *> $97.10* 163368 02/20/96 $113.33 DC SALES COMPANY INC FILTER MATERIAL 389644 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 5538 < *> $113.33* 163369 02/20/96 $75.00 DENECKE, LEILA AC INSTRUCTOR 021396 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 163370 02/20/96 $27.80 DIAMOND VOGEL GRAY PRIMER 80231080 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5436 < *> $27.80* 163371 02/20/96 $368.00 DICTAPHONE CORP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE S491275 POLICE .DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $368.00* 163372 02/20/96 $128.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC INSTRUCTOR 021396 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $128.00* 163373 02/20/96 $340.80 DISCOUNT STEEL INC MATERIAL 27234 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5517 < *> $340.80* 163374 02/20/96 $375.00 DNR DNR PERMIT FEES /VARIO 021396 GENERAL STORM LIC &.PERMITS < *> $375.00* 163375 02/20/96 $500.00 DR. ROBERT C. DIERCKS ES USED FURN 020296 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 6194 < *> $500.00* 1.63376 02/20/96 $25.00 DUDA, LEON PLUMBING REG REFUND 013096 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERMI < *> $25.00* 163377 02/20/96 $585.00 DYNAMIC LEADERSHIP SERVI TRAINING 2595 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $585.00* 163378 02/20/96 $415.55 E -Z SHARP INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 0713 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 6127 < *> $415.55* 163379 02/20/96 $1,154.45 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 628242 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,338.65 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 628243 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $129.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 628244 . YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $994.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 628245 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,221.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 631199 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,154.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 631200 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $54.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 641198 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $883.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 641198 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,930.00* 163380 02/20/96 $94.79 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST ELIMINATION 3738349 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163380 02/20/96 $111.83 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST CONTROL 3738345 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $206.62* 163381 02/20/96 $4.77 EDINA HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 357815 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL.SUPPLI < *> $4.77* 163382 02/20/96 $24.19 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LABLES -2ND GRADE 51 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES 6180 02/20/96 $18.66 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COACH PITCH DIRECTORY 020796 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $42.85* 163383 02/20/96 $3,698.47 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -1 PYM STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $3,698.47* 163384 02/20/96 $15.80 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE SW 22685358 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 4387 02/20/96 $155.28 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE RRW /SW 25392856 LIQUOR 50TH ST OFFICE SUPPLIE 6290 02/20/96 $155.28 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE RRW /SW 25392856 LIQUOR YORK GE OFFICE SUPPLIE 6290 02/20/96 $155.28 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE RRW /SW 25392856 VERNON LIQUOR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6290 < *> $481.64* 163385 02/20/96 $100.99 EIDEM, KRIS UNI -FORM ALLOWANCE /POL 021396 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $100.99* 163386 02/20/96 $478.21 ELVIN SAFETY GENERAL SUPPLIES 9346001 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 6126 < *> $478.21* 163387 02/20/96 $33.78 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO FILM C31851 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 6279 02/20/96 $119.69 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO ADVERTISING 32442 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 5119 < *> $153.47* 163388 02/20/96 $44.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS COURIER SERVICES 57224718 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $44.00* 163389 02/20/96 $7,958.37 FIRST TRUST N.A. COP PAYMENT 022096 GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQUI 02/20/96 $16,70.6.00 FIRST TRUST N.A. COP PAYMENT 022096 ARENA ADMINIST PROF SERVICES 02/20/96 $8,221.45 FIRST TRUST N.A. COP PAYMENT 022096 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $32,885.82* 163390 02/20/96 $2,694.50 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT FEE 020996 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 02/20/96 $730.25 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT FEE 020996 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 02/20/96 $712.75 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT FEE 020996 ARENA ADMINIST PROF SERVICES < *> $4,137.50* 163391 02/20/96 $104.01 FOOT -JOY COST OF,GOODS - PRO S 4307007 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5605. < *> $104.01* 163392 02/20/96 $487.39 FORRESTER'S J COST OF GOODS - PRO S 229905 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5609 < *> $487.39* 163393 02/20/96 $47.87 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 243360 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS. 6306 < *> $47.87* 163394 02/20/96 $162.77 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC PAINT 79BLU GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 6013 < *> $162.77*- 163395 02/20/96 $68.90 FRAME, SUSAN COST OF GOODS SOLD 7092 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5814 COUNCIL CHE(_.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $68.90* 163396 02/20/96 $99.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS CONT ED /POLICE 013196 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $99.00* 163397 02/20/96 $79.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS CONT ED 3596923 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $79.00* 163398 02/20/96 $48.00 FUCHS, JIM SOCCER REF 4 GAMES 013096 GOLF -DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $48.00 FUCHS, JIM SOCCER REF 4 GAMES- 020996 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $96.00* .163399 02/20/96 $186.70 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 12681 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 02/20/96 - $22.83 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CREDIT CR1642 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $25.86 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 012798 PW BUILDING LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $1,943.12 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 12965 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $2,887.51 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 12966 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $2,322.08 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING 12967 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $7,342.44* 163400 02/20/96 $23.56 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/C ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $231.20 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $921.46 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $340.43 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $128.11 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $39.71 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 02/20/96 $253.25 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES, 013196/P PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 02/20/96 $189.73 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 013196/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY < *> $2,127.45* 163401 02/20/96 $540.00 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES 4SI CONTRACT 021763 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $540.00* 163402 02/20/96 $141.00 GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196756 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $247.50 GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196836 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $388.50* 163403 02/20/96 $500.00 GARRISON, DAVID L VMS CLEANUP 00059 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN < *> $500.00* 163404 02/20/96 $9.27 GENERAL PARTS & SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 630598 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6122 < *> $9.27* 163405 02/20/96 $225.00 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 00040531 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5326 < *> $225.00* 163406 02/20/96 $201.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS & AMMO 1390 GUN RANGE TARGETS 6001 02/20/96 $315.67 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS & AMMO 1390 GUN RANGE AMMUNITION 6001 < *> $516.67* 163407 02/20/96 $64.77 GRAINGER CLOCK /FAN MOTOR 49862349 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5793 02/20/96 $96.27 GRAINGER ASST. TOOLS 49528736 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 5708 02/20/96, $9.96 GRAINGER PAINT STICK 49529292 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5788 02/20/96 $46.17 GRAINGER QUARTZ CLOCK 49529387 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5793 02/20/96 $47.67 GRAINGER FLOOD LITES 49529401 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5796 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION- - - - - - -- -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM-- - - - - -- OBJECT -- - - -PO -NUM - --- ------ -------------------------------------------------------------- 163407 02/20/96 $118.10 GRAINGER LANTERN BATTERY 49529739 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5904 02/20/96 $90.23 GRAINGER INSULATED WATER MAIN 49862575 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5916 02/20/96 $70.55 GRAINGER BATTERY TESTER 93773719 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5922 02/20/96 $263.65 GRAINGER _HOSE REEL 49862637 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5905 02/20/96 $105.03 GRAINGER SUPPLIES 48629619 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 6186 < *> $912•.40* 163408 02/20/96 $172.55 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10993 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $841.35 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11035 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $613.45 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11039 BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $473.10 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11042 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $241.70 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11068 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,342.15* 163409 02/20/96 $32.65 GRAUSAM, STEVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 022096 50TH ST OCCUPA.GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $7.67 GRAUSAM, STEVE PAPER SUPPLIES 022096 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES < *> $40.32* 163410 02/20/96 $717.50 . GREUPNER, JOE GROUP LESSONS 010296 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $717.50* 163411 02/20/96 $660..60 GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORAT SUN DIRECTORY AD 020596 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $660.60 GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORAT SUN DIRECTORY AD 020596 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $660.60 GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORAT SUN DIRECTORY AD 020596 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $1,981.80* 163412 02/20/96 $56.45 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO MIRROR /SNAP DISC B25122 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 5783 < *> $56.45* 163413 02/20/96 $249.15 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY OIL 282526 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 5749 < *> $249.15* 163414 02/20/96 $239.59 HANCE COMPANIES REPAIR PARTS 020196 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $239.59* 163415 02/20/96 $1,195.00 HARRISON ELECTRIC INC ELECTRICAL WORK 020996 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $1,195.00* 163416 02/20/96 $2,087.21. HAWKINS CHEMICAL WATER CHEMICALS 78220 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 9679 < *> $2,087.21* 163417 02/20/96 $286.60 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES -ART CE 021396 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $286.60* 163418 02/20/96 $369.00 HEIM, HARRY CLASS.SUPPLY FEES 021396 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $369.00* 163419 02/20/96 $181.44 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 10606 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4771 < *> $181.44 *. 163420 02/20/96 $324.19 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 4694 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9074 < *> $324.19* 163421 02/20/96 $1,659.15 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE PRINTING 10960016 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 6193 < *> $1,659.15* COUNCIL CHEu., REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163422 02/20/96 $228.00 HIRSH, JIM SOCCER REF 19 GAMES 013096 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $372.00 HIRSH, JIM SOCCER REF 32 GAMES 020996 GOLF DOME PE RS SERVICES < *> $600.00* 163423 02/20/96 $176.70 HOHENSTEIN INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145534 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE , 02/20/96 $113.75 HOHENSTEIN INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145875 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $290.45* 163424 02/20/96 $60.23 HOLIDAY INN MOTEL RESERVATION 1 N 020796 PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $60.23* 163425 02/20/96 $51.70 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56493 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $51.70* 163426 02/20/96 $148.99 HONEYWELL INC INSTALL NEW THERMOSTA 303PT350 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 6353 < *> $148.99* 163427 02/20/96 $130.94 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL CHLORINE,D.E. 6535 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 6183 < *> $130.94* 163428 02/20/96 $58.27 HUEBSCH TOWELS,RUGS 937333 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 02/20/96 $45.18 HUEBSCH TOWELS,RUGS 941272 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $103.45* 163429 02/20/96 $3,563.06 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 9185 FIRE DEPT. GEN INVENTORY WATE 1091 02/20/96 $1,593.03 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 9186 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 < *> $5,156.09* 163430 02/20/96 $236.00 INGMAN,LABORATORIES INC WATER TESTING 0196CED LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES < *> $236.00* 163431 02/20/96 $146.86 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE REPAIR WORK 160498 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6207 < *> $146.86* 163432 02/20/96 $425.00 IOS SERVICE CONTRACT -FAX 603590 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $425.00* 163433 02/20/96 $540.94 IZOD CLUB GOLF & TENNIS COST OF GOODS - PRO S 644821 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4180 02/20/96 $280.19 IZOD CLUB GOLF & TENNIS COST OF GOODS - PRO S 645781 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4180 02/20/96 $608.12 IZOD CLUB GOLF & TENNIS COST OF GOODS - PRO S 645785 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4180 < *> $1,429.25* 163434 02/20/96 $294.13 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER CONTRACTED SERVICE 12357 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6330 02/20/96 $151.25 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER CONTRACTED SERVICES 12387 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6329 < *> $445.38* 163435 02/20/96 $441.98 J -CRAFT INC VALVE 17138 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5735 02/20/96 $380.00 J -CRAFT INC INSTALL UNDERBODY SCR 17190 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5743 02/20/96 $717.45 J -CRAFT INC BOX REPAIR 17191 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5893 02/20/96 $956.00 J -CRAFT INC. REMOVE BOX HOIST 17200 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5683 02/20/96 $449.53 J -CRAFT INC REPAIR HOIST 17209 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 6049 < *> $2,944.96* 163436 02/20/96 $492.85 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C WIRE 01176772 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5792 02/20/96 $143.70 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ELECTRICAL 01236790 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5919 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $636.55* 163437 02/20/96 $33.20 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING AA3187 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 02/20/96 $1,019.20 JERRYS PRINTING GENERAL.SUPPLIES 4508 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 6109 02/20/96 $256.67 JERRYS PRINTING STUFFER 4641 GENERAL(BILLIN PRINTING 6328 < *> $1,309.07* 163438 02/20/96 $70.40 JOHNSON, LINNEA PART TIME MAINT AC 021396 ART.CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES < *> $70.40* 163439 02/20/96 $53.75 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 021396 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $92.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 021396 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 02/20/96 $27.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI CLASS REFUNDS 021396 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $173.15* 163440 02/20/96 $162.50 Jordon Beverage COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 24508 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $162.50* 163441 02/20/96 $121.05 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 013196 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 5640 02/20/96 $239.00 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 013196 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 5640 02/20/96 $733.67 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 013196 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5640 02/20/96 $125.25 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 013196 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 5640 < * >. $1,218.97* 163442 02/20/96 $269.80 JPM STORE FIXTURE & DISP DISPLAYS 280159 PRO SHOP PRO SVC AUDIT 9551 < *> $269.80* 163443 02/20/96 $100.33 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 20561 GENERAL TURF C CHEMICALS 5942 02/20/96 $305.53 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY FLOWERS 21807 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 6313 < *> $405.86* 163444 02/20/96 $323.21 JUSTUS LUMBER PRO DISPLAY 72318 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 4404 02/20/96 $188.31 JUSTUS LUMBER PLYWOOD 83892 ED BUILDING & PAINT 5628 02/20/96 $46.26 JUSTUS LUMBER PLYWOOD 84699 ED BUILDING & PAINT 5809 < *> $557.78* 163445 02/20/96 $64.35 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOL REPAIR PARTS Z128778 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS < *> $64.35* 163446 02/20/96 $118.22 KANE SERVICE, THE 1/19, 1/20, SIMS 6901497_ ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 02/20/96 $59.11 KANE SERVICE, THE 1/26 SIMS 6916334 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $177.33* 163447 02/20/96 $493.62 KAR PRODUCTS SHOP SUPPLIES 449198 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6113 < *> $493.62* 163448 02/20/96 $56.87 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 258307 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5603 02/20/96 $723.63 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2589211 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5603 02/20/96 - $26.00 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2590560 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5603 < *> $754.50* 163449 02/20/96 $319.45 KATTREH, ANN NORDICRIDER FORM NORD 021296 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $319.45* 163450 02/20/96 $520.00 KELLY, MICHAEL AC INSTRUCTOR 021396 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES COUNCIL —iSk.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $520.00* 163451 02/20/96 $5.96 KINKO'S COPIES 10022004 GOLF DOME OFFICE SUPPLIE 6009 02/20/96 $36.04 KINKO'S COPIES 10022004 GOLF DOME OFFICE SUPPLIE 6319 < *> $42.00* 163452 02/20/96 $166.94 KNOX COMM CREDIT POSTS 107863 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4756 02/20/96 $5.24 KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOB 428002D BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $137.55 KNOX COMM CREDIT BATTERIES /GLOVES /STAP 190487 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5751 02/20/96 $103.03 KNOX COMM CREDIT CABINET & SHELVING 191435 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 5794 02/20/96 $35.51 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR 192699 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 6123 < *> $448.27* 163453 02/20/96 $1,073.52 KUDOS TROPHIES 1858 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI 6002 < *> $1,073.52* 163,454 02/20/96 $311.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149697 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $58.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149717 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 - $21.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 020196/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $43.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 020196/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $945:15 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150127 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $32.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 150153 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $367.75 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150153 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,068.55 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150580 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,300.65 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 150662 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $4,106.30* 163455 02/20/96 $125.00 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER CHAPTER CLASS /J TAYLO 013196 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $125.00* 163456 02/20/96 $1,192.48 LASER QUIPT LASER AGREEMENT 83279 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,192.48* 163457 02/20/96 $191.76 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE 1394857 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5777 . 02/20/96 $358.71 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. MISC HARDWARE 1394858 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5779 02/20/96 $262.34 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. MISC HARDWARE & SUPPL 1394859 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5778 02/20/96 $64.95 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HARDWARE 1397146 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5889 02/20/96 $220.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. LOCK NUT 1397788 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5913 02/20/96 $132.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. MISC HARDWARE 1400345 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5938 < *> $1,230.30* 163458 02/20/96 .$31.46 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI DIRECTORY 020896 ADMINISTRATION BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> $31.46* 163459 02/20/96 $42.47 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 013196/A ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY , 02/20/96 $38.99 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 013196/G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $81.46* 163460 02/20/96 $64.04 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION 020196 SKATING & HOCK SVC CONTR EQUI 5636 02/20/96 $201.66. LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION 020196 GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA 5636 < *> $265.70* 163461 02/20/96 $14.72 LINHOFF SUPPLIES 674 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI P6347 02/20/96 $36.26 LINHOFF COLOR SLIDES DEVELOPM 7629 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $50.98* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM MI 43281 163466 02/20/96 GOODS page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 02/20/96 VENDOR 02/20/96 DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 163462 02/20/96 $84.00 LOCATOR & MONITOR SALES CALIBRATION FEE 06269 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 5842 < *> GOODS .$84.00* MI 43535 163463 02/20/96 $41.13 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 146107 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $41.13* 163464 02/20/96 $6,487.88 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN 02/20/96 $11,963.65 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN 02/20/96 $7,314.77 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN 02/20/96 $27.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSIN 02/20/96 $27.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 LIQUOR YORK GE DATA PROCESSIN 02/20/96 $27.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0196 VERNON LIQUOR DATA PROCESSIN < *> $25,850.00* 163465 02/20/96 GOODS 02/20/96 MI 43281 163466 02/20/96 GOODS SOLD 163467 02/20/96 COST 02/20/96 GOODS 02/20/96 MI 02/20/96 COST 02/20/96 GOODS 02/20/96 163468 163469 163470 16.3471 163473 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 $51.18 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI HOSE ASSY 211972 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS $200.63 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI MISC BEARING 212487 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS $251.81* $27.40 LONG, JEFF $27.40* $286.64 M AMUNDSON $340.40 M AMUNDSON $272.32 M AMUNDSON $255.30 M AMUNDSON $357.42 M AMUNDSON $493.58 M AMUNDSON $2,005.66* $586.30 M M & R INC. .$101.26 M M & R INC. $687.56* INSPECTION EXPENSES /G 020196 POLICE DEPT. G INSP. EXP. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43281 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43342 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43357 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43448 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43534 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43535 COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1000028 COST OF GOODS - PRO S 100029 6088 5677 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX PRO SHOP COST OF GDS PR 5618 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5618 $45.00 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 012296/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $45.00* $101.18 M/A ASSOCIATES $101.18* $17.59 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC $17.59* $325.04 $1,351.30 $45.35 $16.90 $875.85 $11.75 -$0.09 $577.05 $70.00 $7.75 $2,083.01 $23.50 $1,780.37 MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES CAR WASHSOAD /SQUEEGEE 009442 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 6022 HEADLIGHT SWITCH' 2961978 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5921 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 476612 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 476618 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 476619 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 476620 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 476630 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 476631 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 013196/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478602 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 478603 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 478604_ YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478895 - 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 478896 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478902 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE' COUNCIL LHS-., REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163473 02/20/96 $78.15 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478903 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $787.15 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478911 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $23.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 478912 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $406.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 480858 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $731.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 480877 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $507.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 480882 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,563.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 481137 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $31.85 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 481138 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $11,297.83* 163474 02/20/96 $96.00 MARSHALL, JOHN SOCCER REF 8 GAMES 013096 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES 02/20/96 $72.00 MARSHALL, JOHN SOCCER REF 6 GAMES 020996 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $168.00* 163475 02/20/96 $15.00 MARSTON, ELLIOTT UP SHOW REGISTRATION 020596 PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $15.00* 163476 02/20/96 $70.00 MASCPA CONFERENCE FEE 020796 PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $70.00* 163477 02/20/96 $15.19 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 161720 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5811 02/20/96 $23.73 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 161721 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5811 02/20/96 $19.30 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 161722 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5811 < *> $58.22* 163478 02/20/96 $546.35 MCCAREN DESIGN PLANTS 1593 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 5865 < *> $546.35* 163479 02/20/96 $17.58 MEDZIS, ANDREW LUNCHES /RADIOLOGICAL 020796 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $17.58* 163480 02/20/96 $10.22 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 LUMBER 638896 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 5210 02/20/96 $88.75 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 TOOLS 12989 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 5663 < *> $98.97* 163481 02/20/96 $475.56 MERIT SUPPLY HANDI -WIPES & PAPER T 41194 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5710 02/20/96 $243.20 MERIT SUPPLY WIPE -ALLS 41215 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5769 02/20/96 $249.42 MERIT SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES 41282 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 5797 -- 02/20/96 $92.12 MERIT SUPPLY LPS II 41304 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5908 02/20/96 $364.86 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 41359 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5944 .02/20/96 $470.41 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 41403 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6063 02/20/96 $389.60 MERIT SUPPLY MISC CLEANING ITEMS 41387 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 6052 < *> $2,285.17* 163482 02/20/96 $1,107.60 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY WALL PADDING 10716 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI P6287 02/20/96 $477.20 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 10844 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 6149 < *> $1,584.80* 163483 02/20/96 $96.67 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL DEER FEED 00107118 DEER CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 5947 < *> $96.67* 163484 02/20/96 $3,546.66 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES & REPAIR 1556182 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 6045 02/20/96 $3,197.06 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES & REPAIR 1557258 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 6045 02/20/96 - $3,547.64 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES & REPAIR 1557467 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 6045 < *> $3,196.08* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------- 163485 02/20/96 $105.28 MINN COMM PAGING POWERLINK RENT 70221202 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE c *> $105.28* 163486 02/20/96 $106.50 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC 0 MLS SOLD REPORT 230057 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $106.50* 163487 02/20/96 $90.00 MINNEAPOLIS ELECTRONIC B BALANCE ROTOR & IMPEL 103558 LIFT STATION M CONTR REPAIRS 6100 <*> $90.00* 163488 02/20'/96 $5.11 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA SUPPLIES R1129503 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI *> $5.11* 163490 02/20/96 $1,624.36 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 02/20/96 $1,180.24 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 02/20/96 $8,777.20 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 PW BUILDING HEAT 02/20/96 $2,968.13 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022.096 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 02/20/96 $637.67 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 02/20/96 $38.44 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 POOL OPERATION HEAT 02/20/96 $1,276.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 02/20/96 $406.48 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 02/20/96 $11,506.97 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096, GOLF DOME HEAT 02/20/96 $4,613.83 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 02/20/96 $4,788.15 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 ED BUILDING & HEAT. 02/20/96 $981.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 02/20/96 $4,109.37 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 02/20/96 $152.36 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 02/20/96 $188.30 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 02/20/96 $268.03 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 02/20/96 $1,468.36 MINNEGASCO HEAT 022096 ED BUILDING & HEAT < *> $44,986.26* 163491 02/20/96 $300.00 MINNESOTA ASPHALT PAVEME CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 020996 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $300.00* 163492 02/20/96 $60.00 MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTI CONT ED /POLICE 013196 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS <*> $60.00* 163493 02/20/96 $116.55 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC BOOTS 119539 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5890 02/20/96 $242.24 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC OVER THE SHOE BOOT 119539 DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPME 5890 02/20/96 $31.26 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC OVER THE SHOE BOOT 119700 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5915 02/20/96 $31.26 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC OVER THE SHOE BOOT 120061 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5915 <*> $421.31* 163494 02/20/96 $39.24 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO LEGAL AD -FIRE ADA 18040 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 02/20/96 $568.35 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO HELP WANTED ADS. 013196 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 02/20/96. $260.90 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADVERTISING 172051 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 02/20/96 $332.53 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADS -XMAS 175658/1 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 02/20/96 $332.54 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADS -XMAS 175658/1 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 02/20/96 $332.53 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADS -XMAS 175658/1 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 02/20/96 $27.25 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO LEGAL ADS FOR BIDS 18074 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE <*> $1,893.34* 163495 02/20/96 $4,175.69 MINNESOTA UC FUND UNEMPLOYMENT INS .011996 CENT SVC GENER UNEMP COMP < *> $4,175.69* COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163496 02/20/96 $22.50 MINNESOTA WATER TREATMEN PLUMBING CANCELLATION 013096 GENERAL FD PRO PLUMBING PERMI < *> $22.50* 163497 02/20/96 $76.00 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL WINDOWS MONTHLY PAYME 1568654 EQUIPMENT OPER HAZ. WASTE DIS < *> $76.00* 163498 02/20/96 $220.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE EDUC EX TRAINING POLICE 020796 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $220.00* 163499 02/20/96 $1,127.49 MN STATE TREASURER BUIL STATE SURCHARGE DEC 1995 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX < *> $1,127.49* 163500 02/20/96 $265.99 MOORE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 8407532 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5461 02/20/96 $143.88 MOORE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 8438155 POLICE DEPT., G FIRST AID SUPP 5846 02/20/96 $314.54 MOORE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 8438155 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5846 < *> $724.41* 163501 02/20/96 $90.00 MRPA AQUATIC CONFERENCE 020696 POOL ADMIN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $90.00* 163502 02/20/96 $500.00 MSP COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING M35603 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $500.00* 163503 02/20/96 $38.23 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I81157 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6116 02/20/96 $339.49 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I81261 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6118 02/20/96 $48.76 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I81418 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6121 < *> $426.48* ' 163504 02/20/96 $53.50 MUNICILITE CO POWER SUPPLY 7247 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5913 02/20/96 $111.83 MUNICILITE CO REFLECTOR 7263 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5914 02/20/96 $53.50 MUNICILITE CO POWER SUPPLY 7279 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 6056 < *> $218.83* 163505 02/20/96 $125.40 MUZAK MUSIC SERVICE 080348 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $125.40* 163506 02/20/96 $75.00 NATIONAL GUARDIAN SYSTEM CART /DECK 1120876 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP < *> $75.00* 163507 02/20/96 - $73.61 INEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD 775776 POOL TRACK GRE COST OF GD SOL 02/20/96 $182.78 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD 487673 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4775 02/20/96 $38.52 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD 489767 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4773 < *> $147.69* 163508 02/20/96 $40.17 NELSON, DAVID CONT ED /POLICE 013196 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $40.17* 163509 02/20/96 $3,019.60 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. SALT 10163866 SNOW & ICE REM SALT 02/20/96 $2,396.95 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. SALT 10164937 SNOW & ICE REM SALT 02/20/96 $6,166.00 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. SALT 10166311 SNOW & ICE REM SALT 02/20/96 $3,202.02 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. SALT 10167407 SNOW & ICE REM SALT < *> $14,784.57* 163510 02/20%96 $30.77 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 116700 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6114 02/20/96 $7.67 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 116758 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6114 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM LIGHT & POWER 022096 page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------_---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < *> POWER $38.44* LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & 163511 02/20/96 $299.25 NORTHERN SPACE HEATERS 361079TI BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 6097 < *> LIGHT& $299.25* POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 163512 02/20/96 $57.16 NORTHWEST•GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 239219,..ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5816. & 02/20/96 $21.30 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 23922.2 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD -SOL 5816 < *> 022096 $78.46* & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 163513 02/20/96 $163.35 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NEW WHEEL /VALVE STEM NW26579 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5407 .< *> - $163.35* & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 163515 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 163516 02/20/96 163517 02/20/96 163518 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 02/20/96 163519 02/20/96 $25,711.98 $6,981.32 $4,326.44 $264.24 $17.00 $8.67 $5,655.24 $15.08 $1,500.70 $2,158.61 $6,699.88 $809.84 $282.15 $71.34 $320.01 $2,195.28 $1,466.52 $8,559.62 $882.90 $24.65 $1,083.44 $651.41 $40.12 $6,815.15 $99.65 $89.35 $76,730.59* $469.71 $469.71* NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NYLUND, JOHN $41.54 OLWIN, ROGER $41.54* $564.45 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM $31.95 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM $497.90 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM $497.90 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM $497.90 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM $2,090.10* $119.28 ORKIN $119.28* LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT& 279771 POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022096 LIGHT & POWER 022396 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER LODGING /FOOD /TRANS 021296 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS DATA PROCESSING 013196 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 279272 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 5815 OFFICE SUPPLIES /EQUIP 279576 ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 5815, DUPLEX /4+ 279768 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP 6124 DUPLEX /4+ 279770 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP 6124 DUPLEX /4+ 279771 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP 6124 PEST CONTROL 0051365 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 6281 COUNCIL CHEc_.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163520 02/20/96 $15,826.25 ORVIS, JOAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 020596 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC OTHER < *> $15,826.25* 163521 02/20/96 $64.50 OWEN, JULIE M SKATING CLASS REFUND 020596 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER c *> $64.50* 163522 02/20/96 $43.18 PAGING'NETWORK OF MINNES MONTHLY SERVICE A036487 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $43.18* 163523 02/20/96 $28.90 PAPERDIRECT INC SUPPLIES 44236900 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 6348 < *> $28.90* 163524 02/20/96 $69.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE HEARING TEST 011996 GENERAL MAINT PROF SERVICES < *> $69.00* 163525 02/20/96 $16.70 PARTS PLUS TIRE /RIB LUB 1130531 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $43.84 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1130726 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $116.99 PARTS PLUS BRAKE SHOES /FILTER 1133595 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $177.53* 163526 02/20/96 $882.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59613 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $69.55 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59731 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE .02/20/96 $77.60 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59732 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $55.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59736 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 - $15.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 0129 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $738.20 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59908 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $427.25 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD NI 59909 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $508.15 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 59910 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $823.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60113 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $48.60 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60114 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $874.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60115 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $109.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60116 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $395.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60118 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $26.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60117 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,020.95* 163527 02/20/96 $239.50 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD 13005714 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4772 02/20/96 $56.80 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 13793409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $114.60 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13893207 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $410.90* 163528 02/20/96 $326.05 PERA PERA DCP GLENN SMITH 013196 CITY COUNCIL SALARIES REG < *> $326.05*- 163529 02/20/96 $19.95 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD.MI 06328 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $42.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06344 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $620.05 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 6346 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $106.25 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06345 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $172.90 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST ,OF GOODS SOLD MI 07351 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $961.15* 163530 02/20/96 $25.50 PIPER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LUNCH MEETING 022096 FINANCE MEETING EXPENS < *> $25.50* 163531 02/20/96 $34.08 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 292047 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $34.08* 163532 02/20/96 $65.83 POMMER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 040368 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 6185 < *> $65.83* 163533 02/20/96 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 020796 CENT SVC GENER•POSTAGE < *> $5,000.00* 163534 02/20/96 $225.00 POSTMASTER NEWSLETTER MAILING 020296 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $225.00* 163535 02/20/96 $358.00 POWERPHONE INC. CONT ED /POLICE 14321 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $358.00* 163536 02/20/96 $574.00 PRIMA CONFERENCE CONFERENCE FOR CEIL S 020896. ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $574.00* 163537 02/20/96 $105.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC SHARPENING 12066 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT <*> $105.00* 163538 02/20/96 $1,300.93 PUSH PEDAL & PULL REPLACEMENT FITNESS .E 008658 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 5056 02/20/96 $100.59 PUSH PEDAL & PULL FITNESS ACCESSORIES 045250 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 6030 < *> $1,401.52* 163539 02/20/96 $69.70 QUALITY WASTE REFUSE COLLECTION 4551329 GUN RANGE RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $69.70* 163540 02/20/96 $22.15 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 61951 ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 6178 < *> $22.15* 163541 02/20/96 $93.08 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR 2985 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 5953 < *> $93.08* 163542 02/20/96 $25.62 RDO EQUIPMENT CO FITTING 53924 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6053 < *> $25.62* . 163543 02/20/96 $1,720.00 RECREATION SPORTS OFFICI BASKETBALL OFFICIALS R.S.O.A. EDINA ATHLETIC PROF.SERVICES < *> $1,720.00* 163544 02/20/96 $79.24 REM SUPPLIES LIGHT BULBS 6133 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $79.24* 163545 02/20/96 $884.80 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 163550 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,846.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 163556 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $52.40 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 163557 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $767.26 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 163557 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $15.60 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 013196/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 - $13.25 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 013196/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $4,115.16 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 164338 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $2,269.70 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 164342 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE .02/20/96 $38.30 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 164343 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX' 02/20/96 $2,798.51 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 164343 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $187.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 164591 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $12,961.63* COUNCIL CHEu_. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163546 02/20/96 $307.72 RICMAR INDUSTRIES MISC SUPPLIES 206731- BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5940 < *> $307.72* 163547 02/20/96 $50.53 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 3750413 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5920 < *> $50.53* 163548 02/20/96 $216.68 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO SHOE 83196 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5400 < *> $216.68* 163549 02/20/96 $1,406.04 SA -AG INC METRO SEAL 68056 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO 02/20/96 $1,662.98 SA -AG INC METRO SEAL 68130 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO 02/20/96 $1,152.80 SA -AG INC METRO SEAL 68199 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO 02/20/96 $2,726.56 SA -AG INC METRO SEAL 68245 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO < *> $6,948.38* 163550 02/20/96 $87.33 SAFETY KLEEN HAZ WASTE DISP 425016 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS < *> $87.33* 163551 02/20/96 $39.00 SALUD AMERICA COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 020296 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $39.00* 163552 02/20/96 $61.17 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC VACUUM BAGS 041526 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $61.17* 163553 02/20/96 $33.84 SEARS LOCKING PLIER ID620817 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 4961 < *> $33.84* 163554 02/20/96 $6,404.76 SEH PROF ENG SERV 32507 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $6,404.76* 163555 02/20/96 $647.50 SEVERUD, KEN INSTRUCTOR GOLF LESSO 010296 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $647.50* 163556 02/20/96 $400.00 SHAMROCK BROADCASTING ADVERTISING OTHER 122696 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $400.00* 163557 02/20/96 $638.04 SHIELY COMPANY CLASS 5 82925 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS < *> $638.04* 163558 02/20/96 $26.00 SMART SCALES ENGINEERING METRIC SC 44831 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 6148 < *> $26.00* 163559 02/20/96 $225.00 SMITH, CECELIA MEAL EXPENSE 020896 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $225.00* 163560 02/20/96 $507.50 SMITH, CORY INSTRUCTOR GROUP LESS 010296 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $507.50* 163561 02/20/96 $1,998.30 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 57681 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 .$367.37 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 57682 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $1,261.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 57873 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $120.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 57874 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/20/96 $1,689.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 57878 YORK S13LLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,436.87* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ----------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - - - - -- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM - -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163562 02/20/96 $164.98 SPS PIPE /ADAPTERS 2482537 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5707 02/20/96 - $29.67 SPS CREDIT 2484056 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $245.10 SPS TURBO TORCHES 2487344 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5899 02/20/96 $129.33 SPS THERMOSTAT 2490306 VERNON OCCUPAN REPAIR PARTS 5943 < *> $509.74* 163563 02/20/96 $159.75 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP CLEANING SUPPLIES 311238 . ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL < *> $159.75* 163564 02/20/96 $507.00 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 013196 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 02/20/96 $1,899.14 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 013196/G GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $2,406.14* 163565 02/20/96 $215.74 STATE FOREST TREE NURSER ORDER FOR TREES 020196 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES < *> $215.74* 163566 02/20/96 $21.00 STREICHERS U -78 -SIREN & SPEAKER 445761. FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 6037 02/20/96 $53.25 STREICHERS U -78 -SIREN & SPEAKER 445761 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 6037 02/20/96 $40.31 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 408663 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 5200 < *> $114.56* 163567 02/20/96 $800.00 STUBBS BUILDING MOVERS DECK /CART 020796 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 5035 < *> $800.00* 163568 02/20/96 $19.47 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SOLENOID 26416 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5909 02/20/96 $228.87 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BLOWER MOTOR 26500 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5676 02/20/96 $188.05 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SENDER 269161 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5948 02/20/96 $1,077.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR 265610 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5739 02/20/96 $6.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET LAMP ASM 27347 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6079 02/20/96 $273.14 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PAD KIT 27370 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6080 < *> $1,793.82* 163569 02/20/96 $104.75 SUPERAMERICA PROPANE /FUEL 011796 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS < *> $104.75* 163570 02/20/96 $18,911.00 SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7953 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 4175 02/20/96 $18,911.00 SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7955 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 4175 02/20/96 $18,911.00 SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7956 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 4175 < *> $56,733.00* 163571 02/20/96 $64.50 TANGREN, DEAN SKATING CLASS REFUND 020596 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER < *> $64.50* 163572 02/20/96 $38.75 TARNOWSKI, RICHARD METER READING MILEAGE 020696 METER READING MILEAGE < *> $38.75* 163573 02/20/96 $202.86 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO TAPE /RIVET /TERMINALS 7576100 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5900 < *> $202.86* 163574 02/20/96 $741.51 TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 5001549 SKATING & HOCK GENERAL SUPPLI P5798 02/20/96 $884.35 TESSMAN SEED INC ICE MELT 1614 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5742 02/20/96 $589.58 TESSMAN SEED INC ICE MELT 1630 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5745 < *> $2,215.44* 163575 02/20/96 $13,177.16 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 100380 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHE,-_. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $13,177.16* 163576 02/20/96 -$2.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 71440. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $2,585.65 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 74376 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $2,442.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 74776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,025.85* 163577 02/20/96 $405.72 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2998577 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5615 02/20/96 $54.55 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2998578 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5615 < *> $460.27* 163578 02/20/96 $75.36 TOMBSTONE PIZZA CORPORAT COST OF GOODS SOLD 49390403 POOL TRACK GRE COST OF GD SOL 5972 < *> $75.36* 163579 02/20/96 $850.00 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I MAINT CONTRACT 1072 PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES < *> $850.00* 163580 02/20/96 $64.50 TRAUTZ, JILL SKATING CLASS REFUND 020596 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER < *> $64.50* 163581 02/20/96 $10,192.00 TROSSEN WRIGHT ARCHITECT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 020296, NEW STATION EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $10,192.00* 163582 02/20/96 $286.27 TURF SUPPLY COURSE SUPPLIES 053230 TREES & MAINTE GENERAL SUPPLI 1032 <*> $286.27* 163583 02/20/96 $86.82 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN & NITROUS 450368 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5480 02/20/96 $45.82 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN & NITROUS 456845 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5480 < *> $132.64* 163584 02/20/96 $214.78 TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY INC REPAIR 4462 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7823 < *> $214.78* 163585 02/20/96 $105.60 U.S. CAVALRY UNIFORMS 2823042 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 6005 < *> $105.60* 163586 02/20/96 $185.00 ULTIMATE GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1017 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6322 < *> $185.00* 163587 02/20/96 $1,670.95 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 021296 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 02/20/96 - $166.11 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 021296 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 02/20/96 $1,238.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 021296 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW < *> $2,743.04* 163588 02/20/96 $223.28 UNIMED MIDWEST,INC. CLEANING- BIOHAZARD 0002512 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 5841 < *> $223.28* 163589 02/20/96 $240.00 UNIQUE IDENTITY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 950495 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6321 < *> $240.00* 163590 02/20/96 $6,245.85 UNISOURCE PAPER 32963 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX P6356 < *> $6,245.85* 163591 02/20/96 $496.29 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS ICE MELT 0010817 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5982 < *> $496.29* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163592 02/20/96 $45.35 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP BREAKER /DUCT SEAL 32751500 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5795 < *> $45.35* 163593 02/20/96 $46.86 US WEST CELLULAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 40167401 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 5824 02/20/96 $26.50 US WEST CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE 020196 PARKING MONITO TELEPHONE < *> $73.36* 163594 02/20/96 $55.97 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 DARE TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $4,313.32 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $108.55 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $181.39 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $164.83 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $76.47 US WEST-COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $772.30 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $58.68 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $113.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $251.56 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $43.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $55.97 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $57.63 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 02/20/96 $211.24 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022096 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $6,464:97* 163595 02/20/96 $109.27 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS FRAME RELAY D0860860 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $109.27* 163596 02/20/96 $25.00 USGA INDIVIDUAL MEMBERSHIP 021296 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $25.00* 163597 02/20/96 $288.00 VALLIERE, JOHN HOTEL /CONFERENCE IN 020296 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $288.00* 163598 02/20/96 $5.63 VAN O LITE INC HEAD LAMP 102541 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5422 < *> $5.63* 163599 02/20/96 $29.28 VAN PAPER CO. RID ICE SALT 100519 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $29.28 VAN PAPER CO. RID ICE SALT 100519 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 02/20/96 $29.30 VAN PAPER CO. RID ICE SALT 100519 VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $87.86* 163600 02/20/96 $1,789.00 VANDELAC, MATT INSTRUCTOR GOLF LESSO 010296 GOLF DOME PERS SERVICES < *> $1,789.00* 163601 02/20/96 $256.88 VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAGS 015327 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5926 < *> $256.88* 163602 02/20/96 $47.82 W. GORDON SMITH KEROSENE 013196 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 5658 < *> $47.82* 163603 02/20/96 $232.60 WALDOR PUMP.& EQUIP PUMP BEARINGS 37473 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 6076 < *> $232.60* 163604 02/20/96 $8.25 WASMUND, RON PARKING FEE 020596 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163605 02/20/96 $158.36 WATER SPECIALTY OF MINNE FILTER CARTRIDGES 006582 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 5593 < *> $158.36* 163606 02/20/96 $235.88 WERRE, JIM HOTEL /TAXI /FOOD /MERCH 020996 PRO SHOP MEETING EXPENS - < *> $235.88* 163607 02/20/96 $446.62 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILLS 96212745 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5807 02/20/96 $428.73 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. TIP /BUSHING /BIT 96213395 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 5928 < *> $875.35* 163608 02/20/96 $12.80 WESTLINK PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 02008282 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 6204 < *> $12.80* 163609 02/20/96 $50.85 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 11262460 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5623 < *> $50.85* 163610 02/20/96 $415.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 787 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $21.50 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 788 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $277.80 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 789 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $440.64 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 790 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $98.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 791 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $299.82 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 910 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $218.85 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 911 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $41.65 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 912 _ YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 02/20/96 $555.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 913 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $308.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1196 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $212.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1228 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $350.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1229 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $3,239.81* 163611 02/20/96 $373.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13448 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $373.00* 163612 02/20/96 $758.88 WINEBERG, DON PGA BUYING SHOW 020596 PRO SHOP CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $758.88* 163613 02/20/96 $77.29 WLI INDUSTRIES INC PLATE /LENS /WASHERS 647006 STREET.NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5927 < *> $77.29* 163614 02/20/96 $616.71 WOOLRIDGE, MARY ORLANDO CONFERENCE 020296 PRO SHOP CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $616.71* 163615 02/20/96 .- $140:.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49204 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $329.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49580 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $416.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49581 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF.GD WINE 02/20/96 $201.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49582 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $412.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49738 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/20/96 $159.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49739 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD "WINE 02/20/96 $350.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49740 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,727.25* 163616- 02/20/96 $100.00 WORLD WATERPACK ASSOCIAT MEMBERSHIP DUES 020696 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $100.00* 163617 02/20/96 $953.94 XEROX CORPORATION MAINTENANCE 49934912 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:30 AM page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $953.94* 163618 02/20/96 $176.94 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE IST AID SUPPLIES 54182891 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME 6196 02/20/96 $108.02 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 54067814 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6303 < *> $284.96* 163620. 02/20/96 $572.22 ZIEGLER INC SEAL /TUBE PKC42076 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9744 02/20/96 - $518.49 ZIEGLER INC CREDIT OOR00115 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 - $611.04 ZIEGLER INC CREDIT POOR2114 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $8.28 ZIEGLER INC GASKET /REGULATOR POOC2143 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 2206 02/20/96 $151.98 ZIEGLER INC FAN POOC2149 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 2083 02/20/96 - $1,870.71 ZIEGLER INC CREDIT FM39195 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $60.17 ZIEGLER INC INDICATO /SEAL POOC2184 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3020 02/20/96 $6.66 ZIEGLER INC SEAL POOC2201 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3417 02/20/96 $57.85 ZIEGLER INC PUMP /GASKET POOC2212 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3646 02/20/96 $1,870.71 ZIEGLER INC FIELD SERVICE FM543871 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $115.71 ZIEGLER INC FIELD SERVICE FM545064 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5169 02/20/96 $30.53 ZIEGLER INC LAMP /PARTS POOC2315 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $686.79 ZIEGLER INC FIELD SERVICE WORK FM545726 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 02/20/96 $40.14 ZIEGLER INC PIN /SPRING /LATCH POOC2329 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5678 02/20/96 $210.21 ZIEGLER INC CUTTING EDGE POOC2331 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5925 02/20/96 $245.11 ZIEGLER INC CUTTING EDGE POOC2331 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5925 02/20/96 $455.32 ZIEGLER INC CUTTING EDGE POOC2332 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5744 02/20/96 $36.09 ZIEGLER INC HOSE /GASKET POOC2332 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5945 02/20/96 $490.23 ZIEGLER INC CUTTING EDGE POOC2337 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6067 < *> $2,037.76* $564,032.61* , COUNCIL CHE( -,, SUMMARY WED, FEB 14, 1996, 9:31 AM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $264,891.02 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $1,195.00. FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $6,503.30 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $41,614.08 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $4,464.60 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $283.91 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $51,505.59 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $44,641.72 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE FUND $629.90 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $25,870.83 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $39,908.24 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $664.91 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $73,466.04 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $8,393.47 $564',032.61* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page .'l CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - DESCRIPTION - - - -- - - - - -- INVOICE - PROGRAM ----- - - - - -- --- - OBJECT PO NUM. - - - -- - ----------- ---- - -- --------------------------------- 161344 01/03/96 $32,142.68 - - - - -- PERA --------- PERA 122995 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $32,142.68* 161345 01/03/96 $19.62 PERA PERA 122995 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 161346 01/12/96 $298,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 011296 LIQUOR PROG CASH 01/12/96 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 011296 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 161347 01/16/96 $24,027.51 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 011296 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $24,027.51* 161348 01/16/96 $33,021.76 PERA PERA 011296 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $33,021.76* 161349 01/16/96 $19.62 PERA PERA 011296 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19..62* - 161351 01/23/96 $2,500.00 GREUPNER, JOE CONTRACT PAYMENT 012296. GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF < *> $2,500.00* 161352 01/23/96 $445.40 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURAN JAN PREMIUM 012396 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $445.40* 161353 01/16/96 $87,375.00 NORTH CENTRAL AMBULANCE AMBULANCE 010396. FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $87,375.00* 161355 01/26/96 $320,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 012696 LIQUOR PROG CASH 01/26/96 #, # # #, # # #• ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 012696 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 161356 01/29/96 $24,964.26 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 012696 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $24,964.26* 161357 01/29/96 $32,564.10 PERA PERA 012696 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $32,564.10* 161358 01/29/96 $19.62 PERA PERA 012696 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 162197 01/09/96 $606.95 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56411 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56415 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 .$397.66 $962.11 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56420 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $58.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56973 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $41.64 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56974 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $2,067.17* 162198 01/09/96 $996.99 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 55855 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,025.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 55856 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $768.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,014.48 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56412 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU, 01/09/96 $561.08 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56414 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $757.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56417 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $2,289.63 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56419 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHEC., REGISTER FRI, FEB 9_1996, 6:49 PM page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 162198 01/09/96 $2,284.96 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56422 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $21.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 56423 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $9,720.24* 162199 01/09/96 -$6.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. 4877460 4349056 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 -$8.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 0080184 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 -$8.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 0080192 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $337.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4892287 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $276.49 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4892295 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $810.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4892303 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $2,553.45 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4892311 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,346.31 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893343 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $232.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893350 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $279.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893368 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $748.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4893376 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,810.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893384 YORK SELLING . CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $691.83 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893392 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $832.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4893400 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE . 01/09/96 $3,324.24 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4893418 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $13,218.80* 162200 01/09/96 $45.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1460435 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/09/96 $492.01 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1460443 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $574.36 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'1460450 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $180.89 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460468 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $75.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460476 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $48.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1460484 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX. 01/09/96 $631.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460492 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $677.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460500 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $1,537.39 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1460526 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $585.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460534 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $809.79 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460542 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $571.62 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460559 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $180.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1460567 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $544.07 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1460575 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $37.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1460518 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,990.35* 162201 01/09/96 $172.26 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56410 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $1,006.09 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56413 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $29.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56416 50TH ST .SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/09/96 $136.77 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56418 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $201.96 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56421 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $33.66 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56424 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $730.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56425 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $140.38 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56426 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $2,451.02* 162202 01/09/96 $1,625.78 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 356627 VERNON SELLING CST OF CD WINE 01/09/96 $271.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 356629 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $1,459.45 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 356630 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/09/96 $672.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 356876 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,708.18 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 356899 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/09/96 $1,779.59 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 356900 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $7,516.93* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 3 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 162659 01/16/96' $396.45 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58255 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $69.31 EAGLE WINE, COST OF GOODS SOLD.MI 58256. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/16/96 $227.90 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58256 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $453.67 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58260 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $247.90 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 58641 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/16/96 $58.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58642 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $58.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58643 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE <*> $1,512.85* 162660 01/16/96 $1,379.51 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58841 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $2,431.93 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $224.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58843 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $1,311.07 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58844 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $635.53 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58845 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $2,272.07 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 58846 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU <*> $8,254.79* 162661 01/16/96 - $20.81 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4875217 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 - $18.64 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 0080622 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $1,558.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4920815 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $130.04 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST-OF GOODS SOLD WI 4920823 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $452.36 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4920831 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $3,234.26 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI.A920849 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $267.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4921961 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $96.06 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4921979 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $299.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4921987 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $1,203.88 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4921995 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $1,342.91 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4922001 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $180.14 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4922019 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $735.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4922027 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $4,078.07 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4922035 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU <*> $13,539.02* 162662 01/16/96 $254.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1481340 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE •01/16/96 $37.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1481357 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/16/96 $894.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1481365 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $375.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1481373 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $19.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1481381 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/16/96 $287.92 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1486802 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $1,380.01 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486810 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $126.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486828 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $1,287.64 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1486836 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $1,586.12 PHILLIPS WINE '& SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486844 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $32.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1486851 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/16/96 $577.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486869 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $1,340.74 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1486877 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $1,248.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486885 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $254.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1486893 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE c *> $9,702.03* 162663 01/16/96 $463.32 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58253 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $101.97 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 58254 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX UINE 01/16/96 $627.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF G ODS SOLD WI 58257 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD 01/16/96 $789.74 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 58259 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE <*> $1;982.84* COUNCIL CHEL., REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 4 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE - - - - -- - -- PROGRAM -- - - -- -- - - -- OBJECT ------- PO NUM. - - -- -- 162664 01/16/96 -- ---------- $265.82 --- ------- - - - - QUALITY WINE -- ----- - - COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 355960 357870 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/16/96 01/16/96 $23.50 $1,015.64 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD WI 357968 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/16/96 $1,103.58 QUALITY WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 358001 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/16/96 $834.40 QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI BE 358002 358002CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/16/96 01/16/96 $35.00 $757.56 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 358656 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/16/96 $2,305.49 _QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 358667 YORK SELLING CST OF OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 01/16/96 $1,851.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 358693 VERNON SELLING CST < *> $8,145.89* 162668 01/22/96 $58.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 60549 60553 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $706.32 EAGLE WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI 60554 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE. 01/22/96 01/22/96 $29.40 $325.61 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60557 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $263.79 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI MI 60561 60562 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GDS WINE MIX 01/22/96 $50.47 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS MIX 01/22/96 $136.62 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 61200 VERN NTSELLING CST OF CDSWINE < *> $1,685.27* 162669 01/22/96 $287.18 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD LI LI 60252 61198 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 01/22/96 $570.02 GRIGGS.COOPER & GRIGGS COOPER & CO. CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD LI'b1199 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/22/96 01/22/96 $2,851.88 $403.48 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 61201 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU MIX 01/22/96 -$85.98 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 61202 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GDS GD LIQU 01/22/96 $2,008.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 61203 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/22/96 $1,978.01 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD LI LI 61204 61205 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/22/96 $1,456.66 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. < *� $9,641.90* 162670 01/22/96 -$5.00 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4886107 4886115 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 -$3.36 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 4953105 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 01/22/96 $773.97 $367.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953113 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $533.84 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953121 VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE LIQU 01/22/96 $2,678.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD LI WI 4953139 4953147 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 01/22/96 $328.12 $98.96 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953154 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $296.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953162 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU 01/22/96 $2,062.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD LI WI 4953170 4953188 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 01/22/96 $234.72 $169.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953196 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $874.46 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4953204 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU 01/22/96 $3,310.98 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4953212 YORK SELLING < *> $11,721.68* 162671 01/22/96 -$6.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI WI 1485937 1501691 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $180.75 $38.75 PHILLIPS WINE & PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS SPIRITS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI 1501709 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 01/.22/96 $1,167.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.1508308 50TH ST SELLIN SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $340.16 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI LI 1508316 1508324 50TH ST SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/22/96 $546.24 $196.75 PHILLIPS WINE & PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS SPIRITS COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508332 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01'..'', O1 /.. $742.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1508340 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 5 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR WINE DESCRIPTION COST INVOICE PROGRAM I OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 162671 01/22/96 $1,220.66 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508357 .YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 01/22/96 $708.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508365 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE GOODS 01/22/96 $392.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508373 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $480.13 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1508381 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/22/96 $166.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508399 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $1,696.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508407 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $823.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1508415 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $8,694.33* 162672 01/22/96 $251.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60550 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $982.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.60551 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $128.01 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60552 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $29.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60555 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 01/22/96 $430.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60556 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $59.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60558 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/22/96 $693.64 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60559 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/22/96 $25.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60560 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $2,600.25* 162673 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 01/22/96 162677 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 162678 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 01/29/96 - $18.34 $839.34 $1,260.35 $618.32 $71.90 $109.73 $3,123.09 $4,161.04 $2,292.03 $1,235.09 $13,692.55* $291.06 $176.42 $811.05 $88.21 $425.65 $58.81 $640.88 $2,492.08* - $19.31 $2,821.72 $2,539.30 $708.89 $1,660.23 $1,837.60 $180.87 $6,117.32 $15,846.62* QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD BE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD LI COST OF GOODS SOLD LI COST OF GOODS SOLD LI COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 358357 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 359864 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 359876 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 359878 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 359878CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 360568 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 360626 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 360627 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 360628 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 360873 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 61907 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63433 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63434 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63435 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63436 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63437 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63438 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 33019 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63660 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63661 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63663 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63664 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63665 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63666 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 63667 162679 01/29/96 -$7.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4936886 01/29/96 $34 .51 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOPD WI 4977757 01/29/96 $101.70 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4977765 01/29/96 $534.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4977773 01/29/96 $3,374.95 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4977781 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE' YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING. CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHEF., REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 6 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 162679 01/29/96 $1,550.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4978979 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $493.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4978987 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $819.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4978995 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $4,925.14 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4979001 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $419.90 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4979027 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $327.85 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4979035 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $154.83o JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4979043 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,066.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4979050 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU < *> $14,110.27* 162681 01/29/96 - $37.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1495530 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 - $57.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1506849 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 -$6.83 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1506856 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 -$7.84 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1506864 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 - $13.12 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1506872 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $116.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1520923 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $297.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1520931 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $116.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1520949 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $462.43 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1526730 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $1,300.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29./96 $198.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526755 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $19.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1526763 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 01/29/96 $121.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.1526771 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,564.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1526789 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $203.49 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526797 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,398.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526805 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,516.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526813 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $19.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1526821 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/29/96 $1,346.63 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1526839 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $184.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1526847 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $2,332.14 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526854 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $850.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526862 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $170.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526870 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $36.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1526888 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01/29/96 $504.59 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1526896 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $12,636.52* 162682 01/29/96 $79.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 63028 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,500.99 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63029 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $112.86 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63030 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $108.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63031 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $489.95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63032 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $109.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63033 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS. MIX 01/29/96 $79.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63,034 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,596.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63035 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $25.49 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63036 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 01/29/96 $46.37 PRIOR, WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63662 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,148.22* 162683 01/29/96 - $13.07 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 360999 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $10.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 361456 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $10.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 361457 50TH _ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $2,007.36 QUALITY WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 361766 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,112.89 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 361893 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $266.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF'GOODS SOLD BE 361893CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 7 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 162683 01/29/96 $2,464.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 361894 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 01/29/96 $1,132.99 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 362374 . 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $3,436.57 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 362437 YORK SELLING CST. OF GD LIQU 01/29/96 $2,524.99 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 362438 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $12,952.00* 163261 02/05/96 - $39.94 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 33336 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $628.61 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65886 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $78.00 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 65887 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/05/96 $157.01 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65888 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $817.34 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65889 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $1,370.80 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65934 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $25.24 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65890 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,037.06* 163262 02/05/96 $85.02 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 36139 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $72.55 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 46381 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $274.85 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 66012 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $2,623.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 66013 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $873.85 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 66014 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $1,597.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 66016 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $176.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 66019 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $1,585.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI'66020 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $7,289.12* 163263 02/05/96 $471.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006697 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $99.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006705 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $688.38 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006713 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $4,026.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5006721 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $259.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006739 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $252.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006747 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $310.72 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006754. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $1,552.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5006762 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $316.14 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006796 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $268.32 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006804 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $627.85 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5006812 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $2,176.19 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5006820 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $157.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5009022 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $11,207.53* 163265 02/05/96 - $50.92 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1506823 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 - $50.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1531888 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 -$9.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1531896 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 - $97.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1531904 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 - $61.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1531912 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $1,351.67 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545623 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE' 02/05/96 $725.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545631 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $19.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1545649 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/05/96 $258.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545656 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $346.54 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1545664 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $852.36 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545672 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 ,$1,220.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOADS SOLD WI 1545680 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 14INE 02/05/96 $159.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GO DS SOLD WI 1545698 YORK SELLING CST OF GD 02/05/96 $1,021.56 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1545706 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $215.29 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545722 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHEF., REGISTER FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:49 PM page 8 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 163265 02/05/96 $2,090.29 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545730 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $881.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1545748 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $119.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1545755 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $8,990.92* 163266 02/05/96 $63.36 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 64404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $29.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY OOST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65490 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $1,215.97 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65491 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 - $51.43 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 33494 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU. 02/05/96 $29.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $1,199.26 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66015 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $799.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66017 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $25.49. PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65492 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,311.90* 163268 02/05/96 - $120.54 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 363041 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 - $41.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 363126 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 - $13.33 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 363129 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $3,183.79 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 363965 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $2,135.36 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 363966 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $71.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 363966CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $20.29 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 363967 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 02/05/96 $1,646.23 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI,364047 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $195.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 364047CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 02/05/96 $72.02 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 364184 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $812.94 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 364229 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $956.55 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 364239 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $4,719.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 364240 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 02/05/96 $318.04 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 364348 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $318.04 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 364349 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 02/05/96 $318.04 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 364350 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $14,591.91* $480,851.63* ID COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS FRI, FEB 9, 1996, 6:50 PM page 1 FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $234,599.57 FUND # 27 GOLF FUND $2500-00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR COURSE FUND $243,752.06 $480,851.63*