Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996-05-20_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 20, 1996 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as. to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( ") and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of May 6, 1996 II. TAX INCREMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT- Centennial Lake Office Phase I III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK, MAY 19-25,1996 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 6, 1996 and Special Meeting of May 8, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for, 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass required if no petition. A. Street Lighting Improvement L -38 - Tracy and Susan Avenues III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Rezoning - Ordinance No. 850A-7, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD -3, Planned Commercial District. Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies. Generally located East of York Avenue and West of Xerxes Avenue. B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies, 6716, 6720, 6724 Xerxes Avenue (Contd from 05/06/96) C. Final Plat Approval - Parts of Registered Land Survey 629 and Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 2, York Terrace, Jerry's Enterprises, Welsh Companies and City of Edina. Generally located east of York Avenue and west of Xerxes Avenue (Contd from 05/06/96) D. Final Site Plan Approval, Phase 1 - South Edina Development Third Addition, Centennial Lakes Limited Partnership. Generally located east of York Avenue and south of West 66th Street E. Final Plat Approval - South Edina Development Third Addition. Generally located South of 76th Street and east of France Avenue * F. Final Development Plan - Edina Properties, 3917.3929 West 50th Street (Continue to 613196) * G. Lot Division - 6600 Belmore Lane, Bill Slater Agenda /Edina City Council May 20,1996 Page Two IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Fire/EMS Station Construction Contract * B. Prepare and Paint Water Slide Tower, Edina Aquatic Center * C. Milling Streets * D. Aquatic Weed Chemical Treatment V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Approval of Traffic Safety Report of May 7, 1996 * B. Set Hearing Date - Request for Partial Release of Conservation Restriction, Lot 1, Block 2, COUNCIL CHAMBERS Taft Addition, Donald Beaupre (06103196) * C. Hennepin County Contract, 800 Mega Hertz Radio Preliminary Study * D. ICTM Cooperative Project 1 -494 Corridor MnDOT E. Terms of Land Sale - York Liquor Store F. Rolling Green Storm Sewer G. Mirror Lakes Lift Station H. Centennial Lakes Storm Sewer I. Lease American Portable Telecom * J. Set Hearing Date - Cable Television Franchise Renewal (6117196) K. Telecommunications Focus Group Appointment - VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Petition for Alley Lighting - Madison and Jefferson VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Damage From Deer - Joseph & KaiMay Terry, 5109 Ridge Road VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGERS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 05/15/96 TOTAL:$992,100.49 and for confirmation of payment of claims dated 05/09/96 TOTAL: $173,009.22 Rollcall required Mon May 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 27 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED CITY HALL CLOSED Mon Jun 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jun 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jul 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thu Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED CITY HALL CLOSED Mon Jul 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Aug 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Aug 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS w lN�1r'L� o e Fr �ry yD c• 'IiHPOMTf. . City Of Edina RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE YORKDALE SHOPPES . BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled,- Yorkdale Shoppes, platted by Welsh Companies, Jerry's Enterprises and the City of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of, the State of Minnesota, and` presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 20, 1996, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Approved the 20th day of May, 1996. State of Minnesota ) County of Hennepin ) SS City of Edina ) Certificate of City Clerk I the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached.and foregoing copy of a resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City. Council at. its regular meeting of May 20, 1996 and as recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 7th day of October, 1996. Debra A. ang , City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 4 91��j�`L o e r 0 RESOLUTION City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described'tracts of land constitute two separate parcels: Mss Lot 11, 12 and 13, Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS; together with that part of Tyler Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of said Lots 11, 12 and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North line of said Lot 11 and the South line of said Lot 13, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. Outlot B, DEARBORN ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the C.ouniy Recorder in .and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, L'l HEFF- -A`:%. the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels: AND The west 75.00 feet of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS, and The west 75.00 feet of Outlot B, DEARBORN ADDITION, as measured at right angles to the west line of said lots, according to the plats thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 11, 12, and 13, Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS, EXCEPT the west 75.00 feet thereof, with that part of Tyler Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of said Lots 11, 12, and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North line of said Lot 11 and the South line of said Lot 13, and Outlot B, DEARBORN ADDITION, EXCEPT the west 75.00 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to the west line of said lots, according to the plats thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850. - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 20th day of May, 1996. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) y COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution, is a, true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting., WITNESS, my. hand and seal of said City this 25th day of July, .1996. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT THIRD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT THIRD ADDITION ", platted by United Properties, a Minnesota corporation, as presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 20, 1996, be and is hereby granted final plat approval conditioned upon 1) the adjustment of the parking lot to comply with the twenty foot setback from the property line; and 2) redevelopment contract with the HRA including a Developer's Agreement covering all public improvements. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing 'Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 20; 1996,'and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 11 th day of July, 1996. City Clerk o e 0 Hfv �=v3 .ay • �ti�bAPoMT�� RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT NO. L -38 City of Edina WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 6th day of May 1996, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street light installation, Improvement No. L -38 and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 20th of May, 1996, for Improvement No. L -38 installation of a street light at the intersection of Susan and Tracy Avenues, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. L -38 installation of a street light at the intersection of Susan and Tracy Avenues. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. L -38 installation of a street light at the intersection of Susan and Tracy Avenues is hereby ordered as proposed. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1996. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and. correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of June, 1996. Debra A. Mangen,' , .ity rk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 9 A' `tirr� O City of Edina RESOLUTION AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended by changing the designation for the property located at 6716, 6720 and 6724 York Avenue on the 1980 City Land Use Map from low density residential to commercial. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1996. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of June, 1996. Debra A. Mangen, City Cle&/ City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 s 0 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE YORKDALE SHOPPES City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, Yorkdale Shoppes, platted by Welsh Companies, Jerry's Enterprises and the City of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 20, 1996, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1996 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of June, 1996. ILL Debra A. Mangen, C& Clerk. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -76.35 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 w9�N�,r\ o • �.�_�,O� POiiP�w� 1888 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK May 19 through May 25, 1996 WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, and public buildings; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of May 19 through May 25, 1996 as "NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" in the City of Edina, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. Given under my hand and Seal of the City of Edina, this 20th day of May, 1996. Frederick S. Richards, Mayor City of Edina, Minnesota �9tN.a .lrr� ok e s 0 CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Agreement No. 74863 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the integrated corridor traffic management system components construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 494 from east Bush Lake Road to the east corporate City limits under State Projects No. 2785 -300 (T.H.. 494 =393) and No. 120 - 030 -01. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Edina at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 20th day of May, 1996, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. �Pa -4,t4;,eAkJ Debra Man en, Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: May 20, 1996 SUBJECT: P -96 -2, Final Site Plan approval, Phase I, Centennial Lakes office and Final Plat approval South Edina Development 3rd Addition. United Recommendation: Agenda Item # I I I. D. & E. El Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ a Action ❑ El a Consent To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan and plat with the following conditions: 1. Adjustment of parking lots to meet Ordinance setback requirements. 2. Redevelopment Contract with HRA to include Developers Agreement covering public improvements. Information /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, plans and correspondence. location of the Edina Liq store after a five year period of time is found to be unsatisfactory the liquor sto will be relocated at no expense to the City). Mr. Johansen noted the Hirshfiel ase expires in five years. Continuing, Mr. Johansen said the fourth change includes planting of more evergreen trees, and filling in the existing gaps on the berm with adds nal plantings. Concluding Mr. Johannson, in response to the expressed concern o possible vehicle cross -over from Key Cadillac, said it may be possible to construct a fence along the common property line .: or add some form of vehicle barrier that would DrevEnt-cross -over. ....... Commissioner Swenson moved to recbm-mend-Affi amendment to the Comprehensive Plan subject to, 34, i d Avenue improvements, 2)landscaping screening oti arkii increase in plantings along the Xerxes ~Avenue be-�)L Bond, 4)extension of the fence in the- northeasterl Q property line then south for 30 feet; staff is to work yr fence, 5)modification of path from Xerxes Avenue to ee standards. Commissioner B n seconded the motion wi four lot plat. Comm issionewenson accepted this, cond Swenson, Workinger, R yan. Nays; 0, Ab td ii mm 0 VP'ft e C.. 5 - 2. .. ...... .. P -96 -2 Final Site: >P1an S -96 -3 South': diva D Generally ii rezori <f a plat, and ication >:o# of 4 Fwvav for Y WA of the site owner on height of handicapped access) addition of approving a yys Byron, Faust, R Lakes Office Phase I Third Addition. Centennial Lake p, Hedberg Estate, John and Jean Hedberg, ent and Edina HRA Avenue and north of Minnesota Drive Mr. Larsen said the City Council, on September 5, 1995, approved a revised Plan for the. undeveloped portions of the Centennial Lakes mixed use t p f-%.p o revised plan calls for five office buildings containing a floor area of teteiy 1, 160,000 square feet. Total site area is about 25 acres and would also `a s "torm water pond surrounded by public park. Mr. Larsen explained the proponents have submitted plans and are requesting Final Site Plan approval for Phase I of the development. The first phase calls for a six 5 story, 130,000 square foot building located in the southwesterly portion of the site near the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue. Phase I also includes a restaurant attached to and north of the proposed building. Mr. Larsen pointed out approval of the amended Master Plan was conditioned upon 10 items, some of which apply to Phase I and some which apply to future phases. Mr. Larsen briefed the Commission on the status of those conditions. T4!.B..Y.::-'areas follows: 1. Edinborough Way curb cut location. Will be 2. Location of West 76th curb cut. Curb cut ha conflicts. 3. Second curb cut on France Avenue. Henne., 2nd curb cut. 4. The size, shape and capacity of storm water: constructed until a future phase. Storm wat.i. retention basin in Phase I. 5. Circulation of Tramway. The tram will circut, complex ................... .... ..... ...... .... 6. Setbacks for proposed parking and loca'00.0'. ... ... ......... ....... ......... parking complies with OrdinancetiequireMet intersection of Minnesota Driv'6''::and Fra'. nce, ..... ..... ..... ..... adjusted to meet 20 foot sethAck. 7. Additional Landscaping, e's 5 ... t 0 f Edinborougt : Developers are schedulk." a g , mett.g with.-b .......... ...... plant ng plan. ... ............. phase. has e pond will not be . Rn..dled by a temporary on the office and ramps. The proposed *i.!6r the area near the .......Parking lot needs to be , (on Edinborough property). association to determine .&:"hearest ram 8. Red eLion in heia"hi"J""I -pt I[Ve stories. Will be addressed in a future Like s on build' end ramp facing. Ramp facing will match exterior .... 4W 9. aferia ..Un SOA . ....................... ......... 10. The deu Iddip.d.k.--to" k tions. The developers have indicated they will rltact . . ... :vor vy ssocia :E&W.W ... r.b. gh condo association to present project. . . .......... Ur. Larsen cond.-.,'d: 'e""Of"the proposed plans are consistent with the approved I master plan. lrOndsicaping is provided per code and will be consistent with the nnial Lakes the me. s Final Site Plat and Final Plat Approval conditioned on: 1 ......... ... us ment of parking lots to comply with required 20 foot setback. 2. Redevelopment contract with HRA to include Developers Agreement covering all pu ; bfic improvements. r-11 Mr. Brian Carey was present representing the proponents. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if this is approved, could we be compromising future parking. Mr. Larsen said the parking ratio is 4.25 which is above our Ordinance requirements, adding he does not believe future parking would be compromised. Chairman Runyan asked for clarification on what is being;approved'this evening. Mr. Larsen said only Phase I and the restaurant is being. considet�a this evening. Mr. Larsen pointed out the overall plan has already receiva ' : :::C rti pr val. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if th the final plans. Mr. Larsen said it is exactly the saM.wa sx atory, 130, , office building with a restaurant component. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if thedeveiaprhas looked at condition #8 regarding limiting the ramp near the residential prope�ti five stories. Mr. Larsen said the proponents are aware they are to reduce;#he heigflt ,:a amps. Mr. Larsen said it is also important to ensure that landscaping along Edinborough Way is completed as soon as possible to affordAle propirning from those ramps. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Carey if fhatp is reduced, how are they going to incorporate that into the; .office building /parking ratio. Mr. Carey said that has not been actively discussed, bdt'fs felt that one level of parking will be constructed ....... ..... _.. underground, allowing building ize to remain as f.. posed. Car�rilssioner Swenson asked _...Carey if the development team has spoken with Ed'�rlbor4ugh. residents, esRecialiv m light of the previous meetings on the overall develogmant p $rt >:.. Mr. Carat's pureed at this 6 because the proposed office building and restaurant €vW'irl be 1 E ee- away'from Edinborough residents they were not notified. Commi'oner Swensaatttented in her opinion it is imperative to meet with them as soon::as possible for the i i ut. Commissioner.' -. Workinger asked Mr. Carey if he knows the time frame on when action will commence on the northeast corner. Mr. Carey said he is unsure of - frame..::.:e added approval may be requested in 1 year or in 20 years, 'rrrvn >fhe market. Commissioner Workinger said he believes this is a great development, and an asset to the community, but wants assurance from the development team that they act courteously and considerately to the residential community located at Edinborough by 7 informing them of the continuing developments that will occur. Mr. Carey said it is his understanding when the proposal comes before the City Council the meeting between the development team and Edinborough residents will have occurred. Commissioner Workinger moved to recommend final site and final plan approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Byron seconded Chairman Runyan questioned Mr. Larsen on it will be incorporated into the plan. Mr. Larsen witk the proposed pond, adding at present the City is R.C. pond, and believes it will be constructed during th l All voted aye; motion carried to approve the for Phase I of Centennial Lakes. P -96 -1 Final Defto Edina Prop 3917 - 3929111 Plan ,aphics B lain. i the poSJVon tc d phase of this elopment motion. airing whe location o final development plan M Larsen told th+orission fhebjeet property is zoned Planned Commercial District,` PGt32 and is deveioped with a 6pe story concrete block and brick building currently ocd4o- i by retail tenants The property is south of West 50th Street and is west of the Edina Tle#rnThe exiS;f3guilding occupies approximately one half of the site with paved areioujyrrt; the remaining lot area. he City's municipal parking ramp and service tunnel are l606t .Aogth of.-the subject property. Mr. Larsen oin ±tl' ut the roposed redevelopment would include demolishing the e# ng structure and.' `'eplacing t with a four story builaing plus a basement. The plan indicates that an anclTOr to `ant would occupy greater that one half of the first floor area ah. ll of the second: floor. wo additional retail tenants are indicated on the first floor with nest v =pied storage and a restaurant. Floors 3�and 4 would be developed ft. r office usa, :The f rth floor would be setback 20 feet frorVhe north property line or West.50th Street. a proposal widens the walkway alley that is between the subject site and the Edina Th tre. The widening of the walkway allows for retail components to face east creating adtled exposure and includes such features as a formal entry, a covered walkway along the store fronts and outdoor seating for the restaurant. The north side of 8 J' i a F 1145 A L NUMBER r - g;- LOCATION REQUEST aftI r - -- - - -� � I I� 'loft I , 1.8 �-- LE, _J L L, i y East of France Avenue & South of West 76th Street Construct first phase office building and restaurant EDINA PLANNING DERARTME'NT � I = y East of France Avenue & South of West 76th Street Construct first phase office building and restaurant EDINA PLANNING DERARTME'NT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 1, 1996 STAFF REPORT P -96 -2 Final -Site Plan Approval Centennial Lakes Office Phase I 8< S -96 -3 South Edina Development Third Addition. Centennial Lake Limited Partnership, Hedberg Estate, John and Jean Hedberg, South Edina Development and Edina HRA Generally Located: East of France Avenue and north of Minnesota Drive The City Council, on September 5, 1995, approved a revised Master Plan for the undeveloped portions of the Centennial Lakes mixed use development. The revised plan calls for five office buildings containing a floor area of approximately 1, 160,000 square feet. Total site area is about 25 acres and would also include a storm water pond surrounded by public park. The proponents have submitted plans and are requesting Final Site Plan approval for Phase I of the development. The first phase calls for a six story, 130,000 square foot building located in the southwesterly portion of the site near the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue. Phase I also includes a restaurant attached to and north of the proposed building. Approval of the amended Master Plan was conditioned upon 10 items, some of which apply to Phase I and some which apply to future phases. The status of those conditions follows: 1. Edinborough Way curb cut location. Will be addressed in a future phase. 2. Location of West 76th curb cut. Curb cut has been adjusted to eliminate conflicts. 3. Second curb cut on France Avenue. Hennepin County has denied request for 2nd curb cut. 4. The size, shape and capacity of storm water pond. The pond will not be constructed until a future phase. Storm water will be handled by a temporary retention basin in Phase I. 5. Circulation of Tramway. The tram will circulate on the outside of the office complex. 6. Setbacks for proposed parking and location of lots and ramps. The proposed parking complies with Ordinance requirements except for the area near the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue. Parking lot needs to be adjusted to meet 20 foot setback. 7. Additional Landscaping east of Edinborough Way (on Edinborough property). Developers are scheduling a meeting with condo association to determine planting plan. 8. Reduction in height of nearest ramp to five stories.' Will be addressed in a future phase. 9. Like materials on buildings and ramp facing. Ramp facing will match exterior materials of building. 10. The developer to work with associations. The developers have indicated they will contact Edinborough condo association to present project. The proposal also includes a replatting of the property to conform to the revised master plan. The plat includes lots for phase I and 11 office buildings as well as a separate lot for the proposed restaurant. Recommendation The proposed plans are consistent with the approved overall master plan. Landscaping is provided per code and will be consistent with the Centennial Lakes theme. Staff recommends Final Site Plat and Final Plat Approval conditioned on: 1. Adjustment of parking lots to comply with required 20 foot setback. 2. Redevelopment contract with HRA to include Developers Agreement covering all public improvements. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Maetzold, Paulus, Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:03 P.M. APPROVED Motion was seconded by MenAker Smith to adopt the Council exception of item IV. Rolicall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Motion carried. 1 1611 new 3.2 beer license for Smith, i th -and Mayor Richards. Member Maetzold and was .nt Agenda as presented with the ni's Pizza and Hot Hoaggies. Motion of Member Maetzold was seconded by Member Kelly and ZEdiin. nanim sly Constitution Week ie proclam c to commemorate thed sixth anni United Sates with a eremonies through the 23. proclaiming September 17 through 23 as i stated it is a privilege and duty of all Americans ars;ctivities ry of the drafting of the Constitution of the during the week of September 17 'MINUTES THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21 1995 Motion was made by Member aetzold and was seconded by Member Srhith to approve the Minutes of the Regu r Meeting of August 21, 1995. M96on carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON OVERALL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PARCELS E AND F. CENTENNIAL LAKES (UNITED PROPERTIES) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. C, C►�1Presentation by Planner �\ Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject property is located east of France Avenue and �� south of West 76th Street. The site measures approximately 25 acres and represents the remaining undeveloped land within the Centennial Lakes project. The originally approved Overall Development Plan for the site calls for 403 dwelling units in mid to high rise housing plus 1,150,000 square feet of office development. The developer, United Properties, is requesting an amendment to the 1988 Overall Development Plan which would eliminate all of the housing and would increase the office space to 1,160,000 square feet. In 1990, the Council considered a similar amendment to the Overall Development Plan. At that time, the plan amendment illustrated five office buildings totaling 1,100,000 square feet with all residential development eliminated. No action was taken on the revised plan. Planner Larsen stated that the current proposed Overall Development Plan amendment shows a restaurant located between buildings one and two. A restaurant is a permitted use under the current MDD-6 Zoning. The proposed plan amendment retains public functions and facilities of previous plans including the ponding area, pedestrian paths and the tramway. However, the amendment is different in that the pedestrian and tramway functions are separate, not combined as in the balance of the project. The tram would circulate on the outside of the proposed buildings while pedestrians would have exclusive use of a path adjacent to the pond. The following table shows the 1988 Overall Development Plan compared to the proposed amendment: 1988 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PARCEL A: HOUSING 406 D.U. DEVELOPED WITH 98 D.U. PARCEL B: THEATRE 39,050 s.f. OFFICE 106,900 s.f. DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO MASTER PLAN PARCEL C: HOUSING 276 D.U. DEVELOPED WITH 250 D.U. PARCEL D: RETAIL 201,600 s.f. DEVELOPED AS PLANNED PARCEL E: HOUSING 403 D.U. ELIMINATED AND SPACE INCORPORATED INTO PARCEL F PARCEL F: OFFICE 1,150,000 s.f. OFFICE 1,160,000 s.f. PARCEL G: HOTEL/RESTAURANT HOTEL ELIMINATED - DEVELOPED AS RESTAURANT WITH 395 SEATS OFFICE: 1,256,900 s.f. OFFICE: 1,266,900 s.f. RETAIL: 201,600 s.f. RETAIL: 201,600 s.f. THEATRE.- 39,050 s.f. THEATRE: 39,050 s.f. HOTEL: 250 ROOMS HOTEL: -0- RESTAURANT: _07 RESTAURANT: 395 SEATS HOUSING. 1,085 D.U. HOUSING: 348 D.U. Staff supports the proposed plan amendment. Eliminating the residential component and spreading the same amount of office space over the entire parcel significantly reduces the crowding of buildings and parking facilities. However, Planner Larsen noted that even with staff support, several details need to be addressed during the final site plan approval for each building: A. Curb cut location on Edinborough Way B. Curb cut location on West 76th Street C. Approval of curb cut on France Avenue by Hennepin County .D. Lake size, shape and capacity E. Tramway circulation pattern F. Parking structure setbacks; location and amount of lots and ramps (proposed development requires approximately 3,800 spaces) Presentation by Proponent Boyd Stofer, President of United Properties, said United Properties has been involved in this project since inception in 1988. The proposed amendment is a part of a master plan redevelopment which includes 25% of the 100 acres devoted to public park developed in a public/private partnership. Mr. Stofer stated that throughout the entire development process, United Properties has worked closely with City staff to develop a plan responding to both the public as well as private needs. The proposed amendment would continue the public park, transportation hub, the pedestrian walkways, and landscaping that has formed the concept of the already completed park. Mr. Stofer explained that after seven years, a plan amendment is desired because the market has undergone a major change and it is economically feasible to develop attractive office buildings within the 25 acre site. Additionally, with the proposed amendment, the Overall Development Plan would be completed with one million square feet less floor space than was approved in 1988. Mr. Stofer said United Properties has received letters from both Centennial Lakes and Edinborough Homeowners Associations with concerns and questions. He believes these concerns expressed will be answered during the presentation. Brian Carey, United Properties Development Director, 1) reviewed the approved 1988 Overall Development Plan and the proposed amendment, 2) gave reasons for the changes in the plan and 3) addressed residents' concerns as well as Planning Commission and staff concerns. Mr. Carey stated the 1988 Overall Development Plan approved four large office towers of approximately 300,000 square feet each. Present market conditions indicate a much smaller demand exists for 300,000 and 400,000 square feet office buildings. Thus, the amended proposal depicts mid -rise office units constructed on France Avenue taking advantage of the grade and capitalizing on location. Location is a necessity for new Class "A' office space, which France Avenue would guarantee as well as the additional amenities of covered parking and food service. Jim Benshoof, Traffic Consultant with Benshoof and Associates, explained that the resultant traffic with the proposed plan amendment would be a reduced by approximately 1700 fewer trips daily from the original plan. Fewer trips would be the result of a reduction in area.density by 900,000 to 1,000,000 square feet of occupiable office space. The ramp at 76th Street and Edinborough Way would have significant landscaping and could be made very attractive. He also stated that a change to the five story 76th Street ramp not depicted on the plan, would be to construct two levels below grade, one level at grade and two levels above grade. Howard Stewart, Architect with Smallwood,. Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart and Associates of Atlanta, explained that he has worked with United Properties. since the 1989s. He presented a slide display depicting. architectural designs similar to the amended proposal. The architectural focus was to shift masses, reduce the total number of buildings and reorient them from Edinborough Way. Office buildings make good neighbors with quiet nights and weekends. Mr. Stewart concluded with his belief that the proposed amendment improves the Overall Development Plan. Resident Comment Dennis Siemers, President of the Edinborough Homeowners Association, voiced surprise with the proposal and its dramatic disregard for the well -being of Edinborough residents. Edinborough is a fantastic place to live but why are they now being blocked in like a prison. He indicated his main concerns were that the 1) residential housing has been eliminated in the proposal, 2) parking ramps will be a major eyesore and 3) traffic will be a burden with the major office development planned on Edinborough Way. Mr. Siemers suggested re- orienting the development 180 degrees towards France Avenue. He asked United Properties why this wasn't considered. He felt the audience should know that the Planning Commission denied the proposal with a seven to one vote at their August 2, 1995, meeting. The letter of notification contained a technical error that confused residents, that the property was located west of France Avenue when actually it is east. He presented a petition with 320 residents signatures to the Council, against the proposal. Albert Mayer, Vice President of the Centennial Lakes Homeowners Association, said he personally could not speak about anything in the area previous to 1992 but residents feel that 1) Edina is a residential community, 2) their property will be devalued, 3) the proposal shows no smooth transition between residential and commercial, 4) housing would be a more desirable buffer between residential and commercial, 5) the 15 story office building should be built on France Avenue rather than Edinborough Way to fit with the France/76th area, 6) Minnesota Drive from Edinborough Way to France Avenue drops 30 feet making buildings less obtrusive, 7) if proposal gains approval, ramps should be below grade to minimize loss of aesthetics, 8) additional traffic would be better handled by France Avenue rather than Edinborough Way, and 9) they would recommended a traffic study be done at 8:OO A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Kathleen Kuha, 7621 Edinborough Way, said she concurs with the previous speaker but Edinborough Way is a frightful place to put a traffic stop because of the curve. The drawings depicting mature trees are attractive but the footprint of the ramps is enormous. She asked if additional berming is being proposed and questioned why the area was being developed in this fashion at all. On Labor Day she drove around and every existing office building has 'For Lease' signs on them and questioned why more office space is being proposed. Good aesthetics is important for occupants of the offices but having a bunker across from her residence is a problem to her. Brock Buehler, 7635 Edinborough Way, asked why a restaurant is being proposed now and questioned whether a Class "A" office building had always been planned. Traffic numbers at a reduction of 1700 trips per day seems wrong; he asked if additional study could be done. He questioned why the office building is being proposed at the high end of the grade rather than at the low end. A revision has already been proposed for the ramps and he asked if they could be further reduced to one to two stories above grade. Pat Boettger, 7609 Edinborough Way, asked further clarification on the reduction of trips in the area. He believed the City is walking into a snafu at Minnesota Drive and 76th Street during rush hour, especially as concerned with emergency vehicles. Debbie Sit, 7601 Edinborough Way, said when she bought her unit in 1988, over half of the residents were single women and there was a sense of security for them. She believes her sense of security will be taken away with a wall of parking garages. Marielle Lachambre, 7601 Edinborough Way, said when she purchased her unit, she believed a multi -level family building would be built in the area. With the amended plan, her home will face a parking lot and she believes her property will be devalued instantly. She asked the Council to take the responsibility to 1) look at what will happen to the residents quiet community, 2) scale the development away from the residents and towards commercial and 3) seriously consider putting as much parking below grade as is possible. John Glavan, 7615 Edinborough Way, stated residents view the area as a real community and not an urban area. He has gleaned from conversations with other residents that the 1988 plan was not all that great. It is more desirable to attract families to the area to maintain the community rather than empty offices. If the amended plan receives approval tonight, what assurance do the residents have that the market won't dictate another change to the plan in the future. Sandra Stoltz, 7520 Edinborough Way, said her unit faces 76th Street and she is very proud of her home. If 1700 trips per day have been eliminated from the area with the new amended plan, how many actual trips are expected for the area. She voiced concern with 1) changes in air quality with the number of cars increasing and, 2) her property being devalued, 3) safety while walking Centennial Lakes, 4) will other office buildings in Edina deteriorate,. and 5) how long construction will take on Phase 1 and Phase 11 and what steps are being taken to control noise and traffic during this time. Megan Maloney, 7618 York Avenue South, explained that she was one of the first property owners at Edinborough and she has watched progress on the development. She does not believe more commercial property is the best idea. She asked the Planning Commission and Council to become more consistent with the development around the award winning Edinborough and Centennial' Lakes. Ms. Maloney said most of the area residents have a difficult time understanding what one million square feet of commercial is or when traffic is lowered — lowered to what. She raised concern with safety of the seniors living in the area. If the project receives approval, will residents of the area be assessed to pay for it. She further inquired what benefit the city derives from the proposal. Sandra Hammers, 7520 Edinborough Way, commented that she is proud to live at Centennial Lakes. When the Coventry townhomes were proposed, Mr. Laukka and Mr. Jarvis made sure that upon entering the area you would not immediately be confronted with driveways and garages. All residents at the Coventry have underground, heated parking. She inquired why the proposed amendment could not be built with all underground, heated parking also. Orrin Field, 7440 Edinborough Way, an Edina resident for 35 years and a registered architect said he did some measuring of the plans and the parking ramp on the comer is huge. He informed Council that in order for emergency vehicles to utilize parking ramps, ceilings must be 12 feet high with an additional safety wall of six feet on the top floor creating a very unfortunate situation even for residents on the third floor. Bob Roberti, 7601 Edinborough Way, stated that parking lots are attractive nuisances. He voiced concern that the police would need to be posted to keep kids from utilizing them for rollerblading or skateboarding. He further commented that the concentration of cars in the same location at the same time would be like two 747's landing on the same runway at the same time. Joel Alberts, 7635 Edinborough Way, said he likes the quiet peace of the area and fears the residential aspect will be taken away. He questioned why the developer has not held focus group meetings to inform residents of the proposed plan amendment. Angela Kamstra, 7635 Edinborough Way, voiced anger with her safety being taken away, as a single female. She reminded the Council that condominiums have 'one' view and if it is obliterated with a parking ramp, it's gone. She further voiced concern with her property being devalued if the proposed plan gains approval. Leo Duffy, 7615 Edinborough Way, stated his opposition to the proposal. In 1988 there was a glimmer of sky to the west, with the new development that will be gone. Judy Bezanson, 7635 Edinborough Way, indicated this is a gorgeous area and how wonderful it would be to live and work in the same place. She inquired where the park would be located. Rose Carlson, 7625 Edinborough Way, asked why if the office development was not needed in 1988, do we need more office space now. Gus Gulsvig, 7400 Edinborough Way, said after visiting the area, he sold his home in Texas which his wife designed to move to'the most unique area in the world. He asked that the concept not be changed to commercial. Connie Larsen, 7520 Edinborough Way, voiced concern with traffic being bad now, what will happen when the proposed plan is completed. Proponent's Response and Comments Jim Benshoof, Benshoof and Associates, explained that to project traffic flow, traffic counts were taken including rush hour, information was gathered from Hennepin County and then the projections were made. He stated that 76th Street and Edinborough could be utilized.as four lane roads and that with additional traffic signals the area would have adequate traffic capacity. Brian Carey, United Properties Development Director, thanked the public for the positive remarks regarding the completed portion of the development. He looked at the proposal as a modification in the 1988 concept only and said this would be a critical development for the, community. Consideration had been given, to reorient the buildings but it is not economically feasible. The plan is being presented for reasons as follows: 1. Visibility is essential for commercial entities to be economically feasible, 2. Proposing all parking be underground would add 20% to the. cost, 3. Air quality as addressed in 1988 studies would not change nor would noise increase, 4. The proposed park will be seven acres in size, and 5. Office space is now in demand, not like in 1988. Office buildings will not be built if there isn't a demand. Council Comment Mayor Richards said after examining the whole picture, a mixed use development consisting of retail, housing, office and public use is best for all disciplines. It is not anyone's desire to do anything to diminish the neighborhood. Waters are publicly owned at all parks and the amended proposal would complete the area. Historically, the City does it's planning in advance and compared to the 1988 plan, this works. Mayor Richards took exception with the comment that parking ramps in Edina were attractive nuisances. Ramps in Edina have been safe in the past. The Urban Land publication calls this development the best anywhere. He believes the area should be completed. Member Maetzold concurred with the Mayor's comments and .reminded the audience that the area could be used for a power shopping center rather than the - proposed use. The amended plan is quite similar to the 1988 plan, but the concern is with the elevation of the ramps. He believes proper landscaping will create an acceptable view and he would support approval of the amended plan. Member Paulus elaborated that this is not an isolated neighborhood and reminded the public that the Council votes in the best interest of the whole community. Homeowners have a personal responsibility to keep apprised of any change or proposed development in their area. With completion of the area, she believes the demand for homes will only increase and values will be retained. Member Paulus noted that historically, commercial offices do not show an increase in crime rates. Further, a misconception exists that this is a quiet nature area. How this could be possible with Highway 494 and National Car Rental abutting the neighborhood. This neighborhood was planned when Hedberg concrete was removed. She feels it is a good plan and supports the amendment. Member Kelly admitted that eleven years ago she was against the public portion of the project but has now changed her mind. She voiced approval of the concept as presented with the exception of the height of the parking ramps. Member Smith recalled that many people wanted to do different things with this parcel. He thanked Larry Laukka for his mixed use idea and with the outcome. He said parking ramps have always been a part of the plan although he shares a concern with their height. He pointed out that all of Edina has an investment in the park and surrounding property and noted that the Council would be examining all plans during the construction. He would support the proposal as presented. Mayor Richards asked clarification if the amendment would be approved, would it include 1) landscaping both east and west on Edinborough Way, 2) like materials would be used on the office buildings and ramps, and 3) the northeast parking ramp would be reduced to five levels, not six as depicted on the plan presented. He asked the possibility of the plantings along east Edinborough Way being done as part of the first phase allowing them to mature and possibly buffer future construction. Mr. Stofer answered he would be willing to do this. Mayor Richards suggested the proponent work with the associations. Mayor Richards called for further public comment or concern. No further comment was received. Member Smith made a motion to approve the overall development plan amendment for Parcels E & F, Centennial Lakes, United Properties, conditioned upon, 1) addressing the location of the Edinborough Way curb cut, 2) addressing the location of the proposed West 76th Street curb cut, 3) Hennepin County approval of an additional curb cut on France Avenue, 4) the size, shape and capacity of the lake, 5) circulation of the tramway pattern, 6) setbacks for the proposed parking structures and amount of parking and location of parking lots and ramps, 7) additional landscaping on east Edinborough Way, 8) reduction in height of northeast ramp to 5 stories, 9) like materials on both buildings and ramps and 10) the developer to work with the associations. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Member Kelly offered an amendment to the motion that the developer be required to appear before the Council with each new portion of the development. Motion died for lack of a second. Mayor Richards called the question. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. 'HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 18 1995 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Maetzold and was seconded by Member Smith setting September 18, 1995, for the following planning matters: 1) Preliminary Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -1 Planned Office District, 5015 West 70th Street, Especially for Children; and 2) Preliminary Plat Approval, Kunz Oil 5200 Eden Circle and Lewis Engineering, 5229 Eden Avenue 3) Final Development Plan for Kunz Oil, 5200 Eden Circle. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. 'BID AWARDED FOR WATER MAIN (WM -317A) CURB AND GUTTER AND STORM SEWER (BA-3081 Motion was made by Member Maetzold and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for watermain at Fuller Street and West 55th Street; Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer for Lakeview Drive to recommended low bidder, Penn Contracting, Inc.,. at $262,744.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON WATER SERVICE TO 4119 WEST 62ND STREET Assistant Manager Hughes explained that July 31, 1995, a notice was sent Dr. Byron Armstrong of 4119 West 62nd Street, advising Dr. Armstrong of the City's intent to terminate his water service for non - payment of sewer and water charges totaling $334.49. Dr. Armstrong exercised his rights under Section 1100 of the City Code and requested an opportunity to be heard by the City Council. Accordingly the City may not terminate the water service until the hearing has been conducted. Assistant Manager Hughes stated that City staff attempted to resolve the matter per his letter dated August 24, 1995 to which Dr. Armstrong did not respond. He reviewed Council's options which are to: 1) order termination of the water service, 2) certify delinquent charges to Hennepin County for collection with the 1996 payable taxes or, 3) authorize collection of the delinquent charges by other means permitted by law. Staff recommends that delinquent charges be certified to the County for collection with the 1996 payable taxes and Dr. Armstrong be advised that future delinquencies will result in termination of water service. Dr. Armstrong commented that he has not been able to get an answer from the water department regarding charges during the 15 months he was not living in his home. Assistant Manager Hughes said a detailed accounting of the bill had been submitted with the August 24, 1995, letter explaining that from May 8, 1992, to November 5, 1993, the bill reached $541.70. A credit has been applied for that portion of time, reducing the amount owing to $334.49. 7 ` � 01 w--n � p C i 1 SOUTH ELEVATION UMW =r - 1-IF,t 77-1 V L0zrvriceLeacier WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ante sx Cub Foods ,00.r vo.ns �7� 3°6'-0°x-02 — YOR DALE SHOPPES PLAZA � M � ELEVATIONS 6600 YORK AVE. SOUTH Mew, ghTR„ WARMTWn= EDINA, MINNESOTA Ili , I 1 _ ' 802. 15.0 t` - _- SIT \ .y UOUOR J II F; l a00 8F. i '?F�LOTre 40alln STORE LOT7 RAMP i SU 2a' tB' 24' ] I I 700 Sr. a! R i mf - _ I! 25'" : STRIPES H. _I \1, I vr� - n � // I -A- ' 'ry B 2i i v - i � i 1i�11 I�11, "I �aiy _ Elm I ® _ i1 r Z 32 33 38 lei BIT. - -- 1 24 D 6 m � • �1 , rIPYLON - Be, - �� ls!; YORK AVENUE , '"� _l` !V WPROVELENTS ! �, i : I _ Bet2 WRB (TVP.) BY OTHERS 1 toff; i 1 {7-• I - _ `v 9' STsLIS MC ItAI� ` N RAIkPI' ; ] RETAIL SHEDS; I` j LL 34.680 S.F. ad T I f rl DIA. tea FILED SIEFL� 7 i�•: I� t�. O 1 - - -- 9 - -- I� I �� i .....- _� 801 .�� • � t I _° G 879 $ r I { +1 I I Jema�'emnav 5101 Vemm A.enue, Suite 303 Eots, . — 55-J6 (612) 922 -4856 Cmtaah Bat, Shudd,b Wdah c—k-a 8200 Normmgye Bou /e.wd. Suite 200 Yinneopdi; NN 554J7 (611) 897 -7750 Cmtoct John Johanam At9t8T.ph 5640 S (SuPermahet) 36-0 snetma Dr53 (612) 930 YN 553-3 (611) 930 -3800 Contact. Goq Y.deaan G—m Arah/lw— (Rsta6 Shwa. Hirsh6e /ds) 8100 Normmoute 6-1—d, Suite 200 We— dpd)a, UN 554J7 (612) 897 -7874 Comsat Ken Pper as— Frank R. Cardodle - Lmd Sune)or 9051 n*q Cloud Dd/ Eden Prame UN 55J-7 (612) 9-1-3031 Cmfocf Fmk C,,dme//e bd FildwAr?Anr Weatepoo Proreseiond s— Inc. I -180 5 �Ny Edt Pane, 55J-- (612) 937 -5150 C—t, Gep Koor-hk,. Dmn/a Yoh,lo W A— PIIeOrMgv Hal Lot I (Lipuor stars) - 0 773 arms jul Lot J (Re5 all Shope) - 29J1 Lol a (His fi—J - 0.672 acres Iotd Site Arco - 8.753 arms lane. Eluting Came'ciol Area - PC'0 -J (Lots G -' a 6 andOl - R -I (Lots 6 and Z -lock 2 rork r ce) Propowed Reron/np - ro PCA -J (Lob 5. 6 and 7. 8/ork 2 York F ce) 5- teed ..s-, See Attached Survey SITE DATA SITE AREA ................. 960.918 OF aM AG69 100D= SalONO I OP On.......... nZO®0F. 161 ACRBS 20.402 PARIOIO PROVIO ® ...............SSI BPACEB ........ 10� ""A PAHOIJ IEO11iM ................ SQI BPAO ®.......ODD CAIA HAIOKAP OTALLO WOI! ®......... 2 SPACE-..... C FROMM 91PHiARI(Er)ET IEAUB .. 03.700 9F PAR(110 REOIfB� ......o . ..... .. .. 920 CARS PARKIN IISLIOUf�1 .......... ....• .................. W CARS RATIO . -. - -- - ..SW Q RETAL SHOPS ( WITH 1078 OF ADO) allUm W. RATIO ......... ....... .. ... ... .SOD tlN �MR NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE m veer ) 1 Imh � �J tt THIS PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e� E `v g 0 S 0 3 p =A Will, Mil 4z M. mot YOM AVENUE DOIROVEMENTS BY OTHERS SLT FMM 5mnw -- n-- ICI - a 'A"k m NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE THIS PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IX MH I FEE-09143 j IE (S)-870.32 II f RE-m." , : i Ii NEW I _�_"_` i __cmir�tm -.. �. -. -- -- t,ao EX HE _ snN -102 • TIE F S 7 ! 4 -t•1' i I TAP �e• WAIL em. ( 323• ow, -!- --- 1... - = 4eZe' �1C • to01E,..:tr_ f I I AIrE 1. - 20 DIP, ENT. ,0 a 0w -_ _ cONC\ 4 WALL FD. bliNE i CONC. LV. ! AND T Lv 0>,'� 9• PLUG •' .I _ S11/R IE_e71.ea I ® i:r51UB LIQUOR REFER TO DETAIL 5 qw.)l FOR WATER MAN OTACIR SnAL� TERMINATE _ A TE WAIIERMAI IY F.F. CONNECTIO STORE /sID. 9 I ! i I - NOSE FLP F.F.E. = 885.93 � - F_Be1.93 I �UPItRMARKETI F. E. = 885.93 I y �® ! - _ - -- - - IX� IEb74.0 1� - - -- Ir MR STRIPES _._ t' a yr sal F.m F_994AD [_6110.113 I(er oTMER ., IX MN 25 _ I f IE9I.20 _ � = - -- - - - - -- a as -b• i - - y II` 37• -11P DIP • 1.W1 W t .til. i tool -15• d sUOht DI b 38 1. 32 10% 35 3e Se I /1• CGIIfRACTfII SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS OF EDSOIG UTIJTIES AT CROSSING �F _ �I y t --- - -- i PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF COFLICTS ..- -- - --- '- -- - - -- - - - ' ! OCCUR WATER MAN SHALL E LOWERED R , f .ij i - - - --- "a ' , ' ! AND NSILATED AT CROSSINGS. .._ FIX--- 677.47 ; _97770:1 li I I q l I f it l ____I u I t O I III m n . 'SNP I m i r_9O` BEND -------- z• Y TAP a - -- REDUCER 1 1 -W e• M.M. SIT MN 124• -1 11 .- 1 j m • • oAm • Q 07111 1 2S'-e• I ' YORK AVENUE _ -- - --- -- -- & S-' �`______ ! I !I¢ IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS I : j ai d •0 9' STALLS ew LEE o DL IFM7239 %1' I a I'T'I{,(�`I- -j ` I I co- FETAIL SHOPy F.D. Dn9acccTTT111aaa'���NNH . 4z 71 O1Hx ! m I 4SUME EXIST14C AND rALL Mw(rt IV' I FIFE = 882.3 f CB -112 1 suw ne I .,� •I O g I h44 tl �f 1 1 �Il I : H 77 1 it+ 114 -`jI STORM SEWER TABULATION STRUCT. NO. DRAINS TO STRUCT PIPE DIA. INCH 1< GRADE PIPE LENGTH FEET UPPER INVERT LOWER INVERT UPPER GROUND LOWER GROUND 101 1 15 0.30 RCP iso 877.00 76 80. 102 is 0.30 RCP 100 876 . 102 103 18 0.43 RCP 233 878.02 875.01 88280 883.00 10.3 15 18 0.59 RCP 34 875.01 874.81 68.100 88250 104 105 15 0.50 R 1 110 880.60 1 880.05 884.65 884.65 105 106 15 0.60 RCP 100 880.05 879.45 884.65 884.65 108 10 15 1.01 RCP 208 879.45 877.35 884.65 881.23 107 108 12 0.74 RCP 95 877.40 876.70 880.90 880.20 108 109 18 0.25 RCP 111 876.70 876.42 880.20 879.90 109 110 18 0.40 RCP 124 876.42 875.93 879.90 879.50 110 111 18 0080 RCP 124 875.93 874.93 879.50 879.90 111 7 18 1.13 107 874.93 873.72 879.90 880.00 112 7 676.,5 STORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULE sTmuruRE No STUUCNRE tYI+E cILSTDHG•TYPE SANITARY SEWER CAS71NG SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. STRUCNRE TYPE CASTING Tt'PE 3 STANDARD MANHOLE CASTING ADXSTING RINGS 9- PRECAST CONC BASE SUMP MANHOLE DETAIL N.T.S. I 1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 1NI�I) H Imb - + THIS PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e� 3 b C 9 8 9 � 4 gsSx 8 i_ v OY ol 31_„ CD N��SA EEL Pool 3 €aye I I I -- I; I 11 f , l i� I WZ �sy2 Q I" t t ( 1 15 -55- % i 15" Loc.ua 1 1 I _ �t{ Lo% I l 1 Ittt�ll�� V ADD FABIIIC Q MOOD MULCH (,YP) ADD FABRIC 3 MOOD MULCH (TYP.) EXISTING PLANTINGS TO REMAw (TYP.) ADD FABRIC R - MOOD MULCH (TYP.) TREE DETAIL SHRUB DETAIL PLANTING NOTES Contr -- Mall pl-da non year quorw lce of al plant materials. me q--- o al the I. +ripen a cept. a of the inrliul plantinO nH plan) I.(c+luH Mtllrlalaa hove o me year quarpnlee eommencmy upon Wwtinq. an dams m be M�m,ewla -vra.n rNd /r. nmay Plante to be Iminlled as per 11-11 AAN Pmnl'mq p oclrcea. Ilse m m 12' m plon -1.1 n b' w b. —t- .1 nte) Con 111111 anal) vm fry 1 —tlooa .ilh all u111111ea prim la — 1111tion of pi-ll. S-mq of tree, optiwnh rroaailion .f oat plumb alley one year. Wrap dl amooln -b-Id Imes -.1— top and bottom. Remove by Aprd 1. 0p looy of burlap w Be matena l; remove pot w polled Want.: .pd ana rea b4 p rl peat pate. Prune Want. a lary - all --Id n ery Practice a ecl p a bran-mo Iw ne. and eeialing plwlings. P oleo 0— Moll be respwslble Ia maintenance I— initid .malnq by Contractor. Planla Mall b mediatdy plwtea up anrval at Fite. Propmry neat -rn materiola it necel.ary, tampa'.'Y only II Jielurbed are o be sodded unle rrrae opted: sw to I. oleo1 -d Mrnnelato -grn.n and hardy al.,....smr.. inch A' dery Mall be ppv;ded m all plantoq bed, odpcent to side.alk. —IM dli- oY>- Roc, mulch Mall be .atl.ed govt.. 3 1A' - 1 112'. 5-11. had.— bark mulch —11 be used around all trae.- Cantracto MWI c pct Gab— state 'One Cali (45A -0002) to verity unaargound uWiTy taco lions. Locale and protect e.iatinq 'u.iaolion system onq Mer.es Avenue or elserhare on site. Provide imignton for tll planl�nq arena w site. PLANT LIST KEY OTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMENTS HL 3 Thanlsu Honto-to t,bcwthas '1-W 2 1/2' B.B. FIN B Red Smut Maple /ACm mt -'Red Sunset' 2 1/2' B.B. RU I RW Smut Maple /Ater ndxun 'Red Smut' 5 1/2' B.B. YA 2 Yaraholl. Sear Aatt/F-ll- pawsllvwi -'Mors bdl'e S-d=: 2 1/2' B.B. MA1 { Ya hill's Sal- Ash/F-M.. p- ..yi -lw 'Mor.all's Seadfaam' 3 1/2' B.B. MA2 2 Marshall's Sesdese Ash/Fr hue pewsNvwlco 'M mha0's S-tll > a 1/2' B.B. AM 27 Amw Mcpfs /Ater gln..1, 1 1/2' B.B. RC 7 RadbMd C- apple/Malus , -i cdocarpo 1 1/2- B.B. OGS 12 Colorado Grn Spruu/P- pungws B' B.B. a1 a Caarode Groan SPruce/P1.- pungws B' B.B. CO2 3 Colaado G,ean Sp-/Plc- pwgws 10' B.B. BH 2 Black HAS Spuce/Plcw glouca dwwta 5' B.B. BHS 12 Blair HAS Spruce/Pkea glau<a dwwta 8' B.B. BHT ♦ Black HYIS Sprun/Pkw glauca dwsata B' B.B. BH2 2 Black HMIs Spruce/Plcw giww d-ata 12' B.B. ME 34 DwO TAngW Euwynus/E,bn, s clam 'Compacla' 38' Pot l5' O.C. SJ 51 Satin Junlpar /Junperus wbkna 2a' Pot 3' O.C. SS 122 Sham. Spires /Spkaea )wwlco 'Smarr 18' Pot 2' O.C. 'A"1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE. - u -` THIS PLAN IS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A C a i 8 13 O; O: 3;° poll+r�`a rAg�sA 5 3 z w L Acv u b�i w w �r� L u K Q V u LL W2 z W co Ujg Z W Q�Z F- � � 0 WW IL 0- O U 0 o �O �g 96260 L -1 626OPLFI.D'Y': o.io e.0 o:ir o.i� o.i1 f.ao :oi .qo o.� .'fi;oc: i .le .07 0.0 0.03.TYPE •a: e.'a. o.0 :ia .ia'6 O.ia Cdr O.iO i.o7 i. 79.a. is L .Is ;0 0' :i e.ia' ' 0. 34 e.61 -a. oa a.io. 7.5 � .ii .a) 0.a e.a .. o a.io a s :io; 1.44 ,e.i a :es (2)1000 WATT ' Ja r.7a fa :L .30 0.0 0.0a •... METAL HALE FIXTIRiES r,o. is :io' .ia o.o .e.ir 'POLES - iT :14 Lil O,i e.ia .. WWH FLOODS . .i. e.ae n io :07 .c,.o.i i.ei ON BLDG FACADE j t1 I TYPE 8": A 4000 WATT METAL HALIDE FIXTURE ON 25 POLE ..] ' sm • a 3 I LLLf cc Lc oow W d5 sTm I c 250 WgTT.MH FlXTU.. I U W Z' f WALL MOUNTED 0 IF Z C) NORTH. GRAPHIC . SCALE' ; 1 red : p M1 E4 THIS PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLOT DATE: Xx /xx /Rx MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 6, 1996 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioner Maetzold, Smith and Chairman Richards. Commissioner Kelly entered the meeting at 7:04 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Smith and seconded by Commissioner Maetzold adopting the HRA Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF APRIL 15. 1996. APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Smith and seconded by Commissioner Maetzold approving the HRA Minutes of April 15, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. TAX INCREMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT APPROVED Executive Director Hughes explained on September 5, 1995, Council approved an amended overall development plan for that portion of Centennial Lakes located south of West 76th Street. The amended plan illustrated five, multi -story office buildings containing a total floor area of more than one million square feet. Subsequent to the September approvals, our developer, United Properties, has been actively pursuing the development of the Phase I office building. This building is proposed to be located at the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue and would total 130,000 square feet of floor area plus an attached restaurant. United Properties prepared final development plans for the Phase I building and is scheduled to seek final approval from the Council at the May 20, 1996, meeting. OVERVIEW OF CENTENNIAL LAKES Director Hughes noted that the Hra's involvement in the Centennial Lakes Development dates to October 1988 when the HRA entered into a Contract for Deed and a redevelopment agreement with respect to the property. Since that time, nearly all of the Centennial Lakes Development has taken place or is under construction, with the exception of the proposed office development located south of West 76th Street. The HRA owns most of the property south of West 76th Street by way of a Contract for Deed. The vendor with respect to this Contract for Deed has been the estate of Fred Hedberg. In 1995, the vendor's interest was transferred to the Centennial Lakes Limited Partnership. The Board of Governors of this partnership are the grandchildren of the decedent. John W. and Jean Hedberg (the decedent's son and daughter -in -law) continue to retain a separate interest in the property. M V In accordance with our Redevelopment Agreement, United Properties retains development rights on the vacant property through the year 2000. These development rights are retained provided that it performs certain obligations including the payment of all obligations with respect to the Contract for Deed. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE Approximately two months ago, United Properties requested staff to consider the possibility of providing tax increment financing.assi stance with respect to the Phase I office building. Director Hughes reiterated that United Properties has noted that although demand for office space has increased significantly, other office sites in the vicinity of Centennial Lake have secured public assistance such that Centennial Lakes is at a significant competitive disadvantage. He pointed out a letter had been received dated March 4, 1996, from United Properties, outlining the competitive advantage of the proposed Meridian Center Development at 1-494 and 35W in Richfield. Staff has independently verified the public assistance package outlined in United Properties letter. Staff has analyzed and negotiated potential tax increment assistance programs with United Properties within the past two months. Based upon these negotiations, staff is recommending that the HRA enter into an agreement with United Properties whereby 25% of the tax increment generated annually by the Phase I development are returned to the developer. This assistance would continue until the termination of the tax increment financing district which is expected to occur in approximately 2014. Under the terms of the recommended agreement, the tax increment assistance could only be used for the purpose of inducing prospective tenants to locate in the Phase I building. Upon approval, United Properties would commit to commence construction of the Phase I building prior to August 15 of this year (this commitment contingent upon United Properties pre - leasing one full floor in the building prior to development). Based upon an estimated captured tax increment for the Phase I development of approximately $4.00 per square foot of floor area, the proposed 25% assistance would equate to approximately $1.00 per square foot of floor area annually. The actual amount could vary from year to year, depending upon the tax increments actually collected by the HRA. REASONS FOR ASSISTANCE Director Hughes explained that the HRA has historically.refrained from providing direct assistance to a private redevelopment. The proposed assistance package clearly departs from that policy. In this case, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The Centennial Lakes site is clearly competing with other office sites in the southwest sector. We believe the assistance is necessary to level the playing field with competing developments. 2. We believe that the public /private relationship with respect to the Centennial Lakes development is much stronger than other tax increment financing districts in the City. This is indeed a joint venture development which can be distinguished from other developments in the City. i 3. We believe that there is clearly an advantage for Centennial Lakes if the Phase I office building, is the first multi- tenant office building to commence construction in the southwest sector of the metropolitan area. We believe that this will promote the development of the remainder of the site in a more timely fashion. 4. By accelerating the development schedule, the City receives park dedication fees and park maintenance fees sooner than it would otherwise. Under the terms of our agreement, the park dedication fee associated with. the first building is approximately $130,000.00 and the ongoing park maintenance fees equate to 20¢ per square foot of floor area annually. 5. After providing the 25% tax increment financing assistance, the HRA will still net 75% of the Phase I increment which will be beneficial for retiring existing and future bonded indebtedness of the district. Director Hughes recommended authorizing the Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract to provide tax increment assistance for the Phase I Centennial Lakes Office Building. equal to 25% of the annual tax increments generated by the Phase I office building. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Smith made a motion authorizing the Redevelopment Contract providing tax increment assistance for the Phase I Centennial Lakes Office Building to United Properties equal to 25% of the annual tax increments generated by the Phase I office building. Commissioner Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 2, 1996, and consisting of 1 page totaling $20,170.78. Motion seconded by Commissioner Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 'R REPORURECOMMENDATION I TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES DATE: MAY 20, 1996 SUBJECT: TAX INCREMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL LAKES OFFICE SPACE I Recommendation: Approve agreement. Background: Agenda Item # HRA H. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action X❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion On May 6, 1996, the HRA approved, in concept, tag increment financing assistance for the Centennial Lakes Office Phase I. The City Attorney has prepared the attached Tag Increment Assistance Agreement based upon the terms outlined for the HRA on May 6. Staff recommends approval of the agreement. TAX INCREMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA AND UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT COMPANY .1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.1 Definitions ................................................ Section2.1 By HRA .................... ............................... Section 2.2 By Redeveloper ........................ ................. . Section 3.1 Construction Plans ......................................... Section 3.2 Undertaking of Project ...................................... Section 4.1 Defense of Claims ..................... .................. . Section 5.1 Payment of Portion of Tax Increment to Redeveloper .......... Section 5.2 Wage and Job Goals ......................................... Section 6.1 HRA and City Representatives Not Individually Liable .......... .. ............................. . Section 6.2 Equal Employment Opportunity ............................. Section 6.3 Restrictions on Use ......................................... Section 6.4 Assignment ............................................... Section 6.5 Titles of Articles and Sections ............................... Section 6.6 Notices and Demands ............................. ...... . Section 6.7 Counterparts .............................................. Schedule 'A Legal Description of Redevelopment Property Schedule B Wage and Job Goals -i- r TAX INCREMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of , 1996, by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate .and politic (the "HRA ") and UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation ( "Redeveloper "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the HRA was created pursuant to state law now codified as Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "Act ") and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers by a resolution of the City Council of the City of Edina (the "City "); and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the HRA has undertaken a program for the clearance and redevelopment of blighted, vacant and unused areas of the City and in this connection is engaged in carrying out a redevelopment project as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, Subdivision 12, known as Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment Project "); and WHEREAS, as of the date of this Agreement there has been prepared and approved by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to the Act a redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Project entitled the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "); and WHEREAS, the Redeveloper has proposed to redevelop a portion of the property included in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Project Area ") and the Redeveloper has requested that the HRA provide financial aid and assistance to such project; and WHEREAS, the HRA believes that the proposed redevelopment of a portion of the Project Area by the Redeveloper as contemplated by this Agreement is in the best interests of the City and benefits the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and complies with the applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the Redevelopment Project has been undertaken and is being assisted. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual obligations set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 Definitions Section 1.1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: "Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "Agreement" means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented. "City" means the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation. "Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents for the construction work to be performed by the Redeveloper on the Redevelopment Property as a part of the Project, which (a) shall be at least as detailed as the plans,. specifications, drawings and related documents which are submitted to the building official of the City and (b) shall include at least the following: (1) site plan; (2) foundation plan; (3) basement plans; (4) floor plan for each floor; (5) elevations on all sides; (6) landscape plan; (7) grading plan; and (8) utility plan. "HRA" means-the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of -Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota. "Office Building" means the approximately 130,000 square foot office building to be constructed by the Redeveloper on a portion of the Redevelopment Property. "Project" means. the construction on the Redevelopment Property of the Office Building and attached Restaurant Building, together with related parking facilities and other site improvements. "Project Area" means the area designated for redevelopment by the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and the Act. "Plans" means Redeveloper's plans for the Project as submitted to the City in connection with the approval by the City Council of the final development plan for the Project pursuant to Section 850 of the City Code, with any subsequent amendments approved by the HRA. "Redeveloper" means United Properties Investment Company, a Minnesota corporation. -2- "Redevelopment Plan" means the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA. "Redevelopment Property" means the portion of the Project Area described on Schedule A attached hereto. "Restaurant Building" means the approximately square foot building designed for use as a restaurant to be constructed by the Redeveloper on a portion of the Redevelopment Property. "Section" means a Section of this Agreement, unless used in reference to Minnesota Statutes. "Shortfall Agreement" means the Amended and Restated Shortfall Agreement dated as of October 1, 1992, as amended by the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Shortfall Agreement, dated as of 1996, by and among the HRA, Southeast Edina Development Corporation and Northland Land Company, together with any additional amendments or supplements thereto hereinafter entered into by the parties thereto. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment" means tax increment received by the HRA from the Tax Increment District which is attributable only to the ad valorem taxes paid with respect to the Redevelopment Property and which is retained by the HRA and not required to be paid by the HRA to any other taxing jurisdiction. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179. "Tax Increment District" means the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District created by the HRA pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Plan and designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1203. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the Tax Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 of the HRA. "Unavoidable Delay" means a failure or delay in the Redeveloper's performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or during any cure period specified in this Agreement which does not entail the mere payment of money, not within the Redeveloper's reasonable control, including but not limited to acts of God, governmental agencies, strikes, labor disputes, fire or other casualty, or lack of materials; provided that within 10 days after the Redeveloper has knowledge of the delay it shall give the HRA notice of the delay and the estimated length of the delay, and shall give the HRA notice of the actual length of the delay within 10 days after -3- the cause of the delay has ceased to exist. The Redeveloper shall pursue with reasonable diligence the avoidance and removal of any such delay. Unavoidable Delay shall not extend performance of any obligation unless the notices required in this definition are given as herein required. ARTICLE 2 Representations and Warranties Section 2.1. By HRA. HRA makes the following representations to Redeveloper: (a) HRA is a housing and redevelopment authority duly organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota. Under the provisions of the Act, HRA has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) The Redevelopment Project is a :'redevelopment project" within the meaning of the Act and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the Act. (c) The Tax Increment District is a "tax increment district" within the meaning of the Tax Increment Act and was established in accordance with the terms of the Tax Increment Act. Section 2.2. By Redeveloper. Redeveloper represents and warrants that: (a) Redeveloper is'a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has power to enter into this Agreement, and by proper corporate action has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. (b) Redeveloper will, subject to Unavoidable Delays, complete the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (c) The Redeveloper would not undertake the Project but for the financial assistance being provided by the HRA hereunder, and any financial assistance provided by the HRA to the Redeveloper hereunder shall be used only for the purpose of providing financial inducements to prospective tenants to locate in the Office Building or to provide existing tenants financial inducements to renew their leases of space in the Office Building or lease additional space in the Office Building. -4- (d) No member of the governing body of the City or HRA or any other officer of the City and HRA has any direct or indirect financial interest in the Redeveloper, the Redevelopment Property or the Project. ARTICLE 3 Completion of Project Section 3.1 Construction Plans. Redeveloper shall submit Construction Plans to the HRA. The HRA shall approve the Construction Plans in writing if in the reasonable discretion of the HRA, the Construction Plans: (a) substantially. conform to the Plans and subsequent amendments approved by the HRA; (b) conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations; and (c) provide for minimum disturbance to neighboring properties during construction. No approval by the HRA shall relieve Redeveloper of the obligation to comply with the terms of this Agreement, applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Any disapproval of the Construction Plans shall set forth the reasons therefor, and shall be made within 15 days after the date of their receipt by the HRA. If HRA rejects the Construction Plans, in whole or in part, Redeveloper shall submit new or corrected Construction Plans within 15 days after written notification to Redeveloper of the rejection. The provisions of this Section relating to approval, rejection and resubmission of corrected Construction Plans shall continue to apply until the Construction Plans have been approved by HRA. Section 3.2 Undertaking of Project. The Redeveloper agrees to acquire the Redevelopment Property and to commence construction of the Project on or before August 15, 1996. For purposes hereof commencement of construction of the Project shall mean the issuance by the City of a building permit for the construction of the Office Building and commencement of construction of footings for the Office Building. Redeveloper shall diligently prosecute the Project to completion and, subject to Unavoidable Delays, Redeveloper will complete the Project all in accordance with the Plans and the Construction Plans on or before December 31, 1997. ARTICLE 4 Defense of Claims Section 4.1 Defense of Claims. Redeveloper shall indemnify and hold harmless the HRA and the City and their respective officers, employees and agents for any loss, damages and expenses (including attorneys' fees) in connection with any claimmn, s or proceedings arising from damages or injuries received or sustained by &I any person or property by reason of any actions ' or omissions of Redeveloper or its contractors, agents, officers or employees or arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, other than claims or proceedings arising from any negligent or unlawful acts or omissions of the HRA, the City or their contractors, agents, officers or employees. Promptly after receipt by the HRA or City of notice of the commencement of any action in respect of which indemnity may be sought against the Redeveloper under this Section 4.1, such person will notify the Redeveloper in writing of the commencement thereof, and, subject to the provisions hereinafter .stated, the Redeveloper sha11 assume the defense of such action (including the employment of counsel, who shall be .counsel satisfactory to the HRA or City, as the case may be, and the payment of expenses) insofar as such action shall relate to any alleged liability in respect of which indemnity may be sought against the Redeveloper. The HRA or the City shall have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action and to participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall not be at the expense of the Redeveloper unless the employment of such counsel has been specifically authorized by the Redeveloper. The Redeveloper shall not be liable to indemnify any person for any settlement of any such action effected without its consent. The omission to notify the Redeveloper as herein provided will not relieve it from any liability which it may have to any indemnified party pursuant hereto, otherwise than under this section. ARTICLE 5 Payment of a Portion of Tax Increment to Redeveloper Section 5.1 Payment of a Portion of Tax Increment to Redeveloper. If the Redeveloper complies with its covenants under Section 3.2 hereof, then on February 1, 1998 and on each February 1 thereafter to and including the earlier of (i) the February 1 following the year in which the Tax Increment District terminates in accordance with the Tax Increment Act, or (ii) February 1, 2015, the HRA shall pay to the Redeveloper twenty -five percent (25 %) of the Tax Increment received by the HRA in the most recently completed calendar year; provided that if on any date a payment to the Redeveloper is required to be made hereunder there are any amounts owing the HRA under the Shortfall Agreement, the HRA shall apply amounts otherwise to be paid to the Redeveloper hereunder to pay amounts then owing the HRA under the Shortfall Agreement, and any amount remaining after such payment shall be paid to the Redeveloper. If any Tax Increment received by the HRA is or may be subject to refund because of any then pending petition or objection as to the valuation of any portion of the Redevelopment Property for real estate tax purposes or as to the levy of ad valorem taxes with respect to any portion of the Redevelopment Property, the HRA shall only pay to the Redeveloper hereunder twenty-five percent (25 %) of the Tax Increment which is not in any manner subject to refund. At such time as such petition or obligation has been 0 finally resolved and Tax Increment for such year finally determined, the HRA shall then pay any remaining amounts of Tax Increment required to be paid to the Redeveloper hereunder, without interest thereon. The Redeveloper agrees that any such amount's paid to the Redeveloper shall be used only to pay financial inducements provided to tenants in the Office Building to locate therein or to renew leases therein or lease additional space therein. The Redeveloper acknowledges (i) the agreements by the Redeveloper in Section 372 hereof were the primary considerations in the HRA agreeing to make the payments to the Redeveloper under this Section 5.1 and Redeveloper must fully and completely comply with Section 3.2 to receive payments hereunder, (ii) that Tax Increment is determined solely from tax increment received by the HRA with respect to the Redevelopment Property, which is retained by the HRA and is not required to be paid to any other taxing jurisdiction, (iii) that tax increment received by the HRA with respect to the other property in the Tax Increment District or any other tax increment financing districts of the HRA or of the City does not constitute Tax Increment, and the HRA shall not be obligated .to make this payment from any other funds of the HRA, and (iv) that neither the full faith and credit nor taxing power of the HRA or City is pledged to such payment. The payment of Tax Increment being made under this Section 5.1 is to reimburse the Redeveloper for costs of acquisition of the Redevelopment Property and grading and other site improvements necessary in connection with the Project, together with interest on amounts paid by the Redeveloper with respect to such costs. Section 5.2 Wage and Job Goals. The Redeveloper agrees that within two years of the date of the first payment by the HRA under Section 5.1 hereof, the existence of the Office Building and Restaurant Building will result in a net increase in jobs in the State of Minnesota. In order to satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.991, the Redeveloper and HRA have established wage and job goals with respect to the Office Building as described in Schedule B hereto. If such wage and job goals are not met the Redeveloper agrees to repay to the HRA any amounts paid by the HRA under Section 5.1 hereof. In order for the HRA to make the annual report to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.991, the Redeveloper shall cause each tenant in the Office Building which is receiving the assistance paid to the Redeveloper under Section 5.1 hereof to report to the HRA on or before March 1 of each year the number of jobs provided by such tenant and the wages for such jobs in the preceding calendar year. -7 -' ARTICLE 6 Additional Provisions Section 6.1 HRA and City Representatives Not Individually Liable. No member, official, consultant or the consultant's employees, or employee of the HRA or the City shall be personally liable to Redeveloper, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the HRA or the City or for any amount which may become due to Redeveloper or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. Section 6.2 Equal Employment Opportunity. Redeveloper, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that during the construction of the Project it will comply with any applicable affirmative action and nondiscrimination laws or regulations. Section 6.3 Restrictions on Use. Redeveloper agrees for itself, and its successors and assigns, that Redeveloper, and such successors and assigns, shall not discriminate upon the basis of race, color, creed, sex or national origin in the sale, lease, or rental or in the use or occupancy of the Redevelopment Property or any improvements erected or to be erected thereon, or any part thereof. Section 6.4 Assignment. Redeveloper may not assign the payments to be made by the HRA under Section 5.1 hereof in whole or in part to any,party other than a tenant in the Office Building without the prior written consent of the HRA. Section 6.5 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 6.6 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under this Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally as follows: (a) in the case of Redeveloper, addressed to or delivered personally to Redeveloper at United Properties Investment Company, (b) in the case of the HRA, addressed or delivered personally to the HRA's Executive Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424; or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other parties as provided in this Section. Section 6.7 Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its Chairperson By Its Secretary Ra UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT COMPANY By_ Its -10- SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, South Edina Development 3rd Addition; Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCHEDULE B WAGE AND JOB GOALS The proposed development to be constructed by the Redeveloper on the Redevelopment Property will result in a net increase in the number of jobs within the City. The Redevelopment Property will provide a minimum of 50 new jobs within the City by December 31, 1998. The new jobs created will meet or exceed industry standards regarding wage levels for such job. These wage and job goals shall apply for the life of the Tax Increment District. L A mil\ O e tt Cn 'i�` O �� PROCLAMATION NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK May 19 through May 25, 1996 WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, and public buildings; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of May 19 through May 25, 1996 as "NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" in the City of Edina, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. Given under my hand and Seal of the City of Edina, this 20th day of May, 1996. Frederick S. Richards, Mayor City of Edina, Minnesota MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 6, 1996 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Maetzold, Smith and Mayor Richards. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:04 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold adopting the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1996, BOARD OF REVIEW OF APRIL 22, 1996 AND APRIL 29, 1996, APPROVED Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 15, 1996, Board of Review for April 22, 1996 and April 29, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - ,three ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: STREET RECYCLING /MILLING OF NEW BITUMINOUS SURFACING IMPROVEMENT A -180 ( SUNNYSLOPE ROAD EAST, SUNNYSLOPE ROAD WEST, WOODHILL WAY, DALE DRIVE, RIDGE PLACE, HILLTOP LANE) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman informed Council the proposed improvement is part of the City's ongoing renovation of neighborhood streets. Many neighborhood streets systems are thirty to fifty years old. It is no longer cost effective to continue patching, seal coating or overlaying these streets. Previous projects used either total reconstruction as in the Momingside area in the late 70's, or remilling and overlay with new curb and gutter as in County Club District in the' early 70's. This improvement project proposes to use a third type of street reconstruction called full depth reclamation. Engineer Hoffman explained full depth reclamation is a technique where the full flexible pavement section and a predetermined portion of the underlying materials are uniformly crushed, pulverized and blended, resulting in a stabilized base course. A new bituminous surface is then laid over the recycled base course. Last year a test section of Woodhill Way was constructed using full depth reclamation. Braun Intertec, a consulting engineering firm, evaluated the test section. Their test results showed the test section performed as. expected and would provide a stable neighborhood street. Full depth reclamation reconstruction results in cost savings of approximately 50 percent over traditional street reconstruction methods. In addition, construction time is greatly reduced since projects can usually be completed in approximately a week's time. Engineer Hoffman continued that before the street reconstruction, the City would repair some catch basins and manholes. These items would be paid for from Utility Funds. Engineer Hoffman stated the proposed renovation area includes Sunnyslope Road East, Sunnyslope Road West, Woodhill Way, Dale Drive, Ridge Place and Hilltop Lane. The total estimated street reconstruction cost is $193,002.49. The estimate cost per lot (area assessment) is $2,643.86. The assessments would extend over a ten year term. The test section Woodhill Way was paid for by the movie company that damaged the street during the filming of Beautiful Girls. Staff recommends Woodhill Way, be included in the assessment so the benefit of the test section is shared by the entire neighborhood., Public Comment Mayor Richards noted receipt of Dr. William Kimber's letter and asked Engineer Hoffman to respond to Dr. Kimber's questions which included: status of underground utilities affecting the streets, storm sewer problem at the bottom of hill on East Sunnyslope, whether or not the Beautiful GMs' movie company paid for damage to Woodhill Way, and lastly curb and gutter in the area. Engineer Hoffman responded the City will make sure the utility structures are repaired and paid for by Utility Funds. He added the movie company paid for the repair of Woodhill Way and concluded that only properties with existing curb and gutter would have curb and gutter replaced. Jack Hodne, 4824 West Sunnyslope Road, presented a petition in opposition of Improvement No. A -180. Mr. Hodne read the petition "We the undersigned being residents of Sunnyslope Addition do hereby protest the proposed improvement A -180. We feel the streets are basically sound and do not warrant being tom up and resurfaced as proposed. There are a few places that need spot repair. This with a seal coat over all would bring them to excellent condition for the neighborhood where there is no heavy or through traffic." Mr. Hodne reported the following petition results based on 72 residents: 5 residents were in favor of the project, 5 were undecided, 7 were not at home, and 55 would request the City not undertake the project. Mr. Hodne stated the petition response speaks for itself with 85% of the residents opposed to the project. Jim Gray, 4909 East Sunnyslope Road, stated his opinion that there is no need for total reconstruction of the streets at this time. -Streets around his home seem to be in pretty good shape. Jack Hodne 4824 West Sunnyslope Road asked about the curb and gutter replacement. He stated there are only 8 property owners with curb and gutter. The proposed project is asking 64 property owners to pick up the tab for the 8 property owners with curb and gutter. Jack Rice, 4801 Hilltop Lane, expressed his surprise at the petition results. He was pleased to receive notice of improvement. Mr. Rice stated his belief that the precarious street condition was obvious. He expressed concern over the age of the neighborhood streets, and his desire to maintain property values by maintaining street condition. Mr. Rice added his positive experience with staff members' expertise as a Council member. In his experience projects were completed on time, property restored and in his opinion staff recommendation should not be taken lightly. Mr. Rice urged Council to order the proposed improvement project. Tom Cousins, 4800 West Sunnyslope Road, asked when the last seal coating was done in this area. The streets currently seem to be in a similar condition as before the last seal coat. Mr. Cousins suggested seal coating would be a good thing to look at again. Engineer Hoffman responded the last seal coating was approximately ten years ago. John Kvam, 4925 East Sunnyslope Road, agreed the neighborhood streets appear to benn the same condition they were before the last seal coating. How many roads are annually seal coated? Engineer - Hoffman replied approximately 15 miles of 140 asphalt roads are seal coated annually, and streets are seal coated approximately every ten years. George Topar, 5709 Kemrich, stated he is not involved in the proposed improvement area, but suggested Council consider extending the term of the assessment for 35 -40 years. Cheryl Reinersten, 4813 West Sunnyslope Road, stated.there are many different sized lots in the area. Speaking for herself, Ms. Runersten explained she was willing to pay her 1/73 without asking her neighbors to pay extra for curb and gutter. The residents with curb and gutter need it because of the topography of the area. Mayor Richards asked how much of the total project cost would be used to repair the curb and gutter. Engineer Hoffman replied approximately $10,000 would be needed for curb and gutter repair. Member Smith asked the Engineer to respond to Mr. Cousins' request for seal coating at this time. Engineer Hoffman stated there is more cracking in the street now as opposed to ten years. Staff has. identified problem areas and believes investing more maintenance dollars in the identified problem areas is not cost effective. However, these "problems areas" would be ideal for the reclamation technique. Member Maetzold asked if the City has.a policy of reviewing neighborhood streets and reconstructing as necessary in advance of a total breakdown? Engineer Hoffman replied the date of the last seal coating triggers a review of the streets. Staff determines the most efficient method of repair. Engineer Hoffman concluded that street reconstruction should take place before major deterioration occurs. Member Kelly stated her neighborhood, (Hilldale Area) went through this process two weeks ago. Member Kelly agreed with Mr. Rice that reconstructing streets alleviate problems with maintenance and keeps property values up, but expressed concern when 55 property owners are opposed to the project. Mayor Richards expressed his opinion that if the City has a policy of reviewing and reconstruction as shown by previous projects this project should move forward. If the project is not approved Mayor Richards does not feel any further general fund maintenance dollars should be expended in the area. Mayor Richards added the cost of the curb and gutter could be broken out and assessed to the benefitted properties. Member Smith expressed his support of the project while acknowledging the residents concerns. Member Smith asked the Engineer to respond to Mr. Topar's suggestion of extending the assessment for thirty years. Member Smith asked if the curb and gutter could be left alone and the street still reconstructed. Engineer Hoffman replied ten years has been used as a standard for other projects, however, in Momingside twenty years was the term. Minnesota Statute allows a maximum term of thirty years for a special assessment. This decision can be made at the assessment hearing after completion of the project. Engineer Hoffman added curb and gutter could be left alone, but he would not recommend this course of action. Jack Hodne, 4824 West Sunnyslope, asked Council to make sure the final asphalt looks better than the test section on Hilltop Lane. Mr. Hodne withdrew his previous request to assess curb and gutter separately. Engineer Hoffman agreed the test section shows seams. Member Maetzold introduced the resolution ordering the Sunnyslope Area Street Reclamation Project and moved its adoption, seconded by Mayor Richards: Rollcall: Ayes: Members Maetzold, Smith, Richards Nay: Member Kelly Motion defeated. Non - petitioned improvement projects statutorily require a four fifth affirmative vote for adoption. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO MAY 20, 1996, FOR FINAL REZONING, ORDINANCE NO. 850 A -7, R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PCD -3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (JERRY'S ENTERPRISES AND WELSH COMPANIES) GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF YORK AVENUE AND WEST OF XERXES AVENUE Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold to continue the public hearing for final rezoning, Ordinance No. 850 A -7, R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD-3, Planned Commercial District (Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies) generally located east of York Avenue and west of Xerxes Avenue to May 20, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO MAY 20, 1996, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 6716, 6720, 6724 XERXES AVENUE (JERRY'S ENTERPRISES AND WELSH COMPANIES) Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold to continue the public hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 6716, 6720, and 6724 Xerxes Avenue (Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies) to May 20, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO MAY 20, 1996, FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PARTS OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 629 AND LOTS 5, 6, AND 7. BLOCK 2. YORK TERRACE, (JERRY'S ENTERPRISES WELSH COMPANIES AND CITY OF EDINA) GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF YORK AVENUE AND WEST OF XERXES AVENUE Motion.made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold to continue the public hearing for final plat approval for parts of Registered Land Survey 629 and Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 2, York Terrace (Jerry's Enterprises, Welsh Companies and City of Edina) generally located east of York Avenue and West of Xerxes Avenue to May 20, 1996. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold setting public hearing date of May 20, 1996, for planning matters: 1. Final Site Plan Approval - Centennial Lake Office Phase 1, Centennial Lake Limited Partnership 2. Final Plat Approval - South Edina Development Third Addition, generally located south of 76th Street and east of France Avenue 3. Final Development Plan - Edina Properties (3917 -3029 West 50th Street) Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION GRANTED (SCENIC VIEW 2ND ADDITION) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman informed the Council when William Leadens, 5917 Amy Drive, sold his home the easement in question was discovered. Both staff and the utility companies have reviewed the request. During their review staff found a structure located in the north part of the easement. Therefore, staff is recommending a partial release of the easement keeping the northerly forty feet intact. Mayor Richards called for public comment on the vacation request.. No comment or objection was heard. Member Smith moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES WHEREAS, a resolution by the City Council adopted the 15th day of April, 1996, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of an easement for utility and drainage purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 6th day of May, 1996, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described utility and drainage easement be and is hereby vacated effective as of May 6, 1996: The N.E. quarter of the S.W. quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota in the Scenic View Second Addition as described in Document No. 674937 on file in the Register of Titles Office in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, except for the north forty feet of said easement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings, to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.85. Motion seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR ARROWHEAD LAKE WEED HARVESTING Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold for Arrowhead Lake weed harvesting to sole bidder, Midwest Aquacare at $314.00 per acre. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR MILL POND WEED HARVESTING Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for Mill Pond weed harvesting to sole bidder, Midwest Aquacare at $290.00 per acre. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SPRING PAPER SUPPLY - ABOUT TOWN Motion, made by Member Smith and seconded Member Maetzold for award of bid for paper supply for Spring Issue of About Town to sole bidder, Unisource, at $6,245.85. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes BID AWARDED FOR COLD WATER METER REPLACEMENT AND RADIO READING DEVICE INSTALLATION Director of Public Works Hoffman noted on April 15, 1996, staff was directed to present a comprehensive report on the replacing of cold water meters and the addition of radio reading devices to the utility meter system. He elaborated during the 1980's, staff researched meter accuracy. After monitoring the system, staff recommended a water rate study be completed. The subsequent study indicated the need for water rate increases to develop necessary revenue to conduct infrastructure upgrades and replacements. A new rate structure was initiated January 1, 1995. Results to date indicate sufficient funding is being developed to initiate the Utility Improvement Plan. Director Hoffman explained the five major elements of the plan: 1. Upgrading meters and meter reading to a monthly billing system; 2. Overhauling five sanitary sewer lift stations; 3. Overhauling four iron removal water treatment plants; 4. Continuing to repaint and rehabilitate water towers on a regular basis; and 5. Upgrading existing supervisory control and date acquisition system which is 1973 vintage and is not effective in managing the system. Implementing the eight year Plan, in 1995 staff renovated the Gleason water tower for approximately $350,000.00. Also during 1995, staff reviewed potential systems to use with our metering systems and concluded a radio reading device versus phone lines would be the most cost effective. Staff recommended the meter program because of the age of the existing meter system. Revenue should increase a minimum of five percent or $300,000 per year with no water rate change. Analysis indicates half of all residential meters need replacement due to age. A goal of the program is getting on a twenty year meter replacement rotation. Radio reading technology is a cost effective way to produce an accurate monthly billing system and has the potential for developing an electronic bill paying. Current revenues support using the three year change -out program without any need to use bonding or other borrowing to accomplish the program. Director Hoffman stated staff recommends the project go forward as bid. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Smith made a motion for award of bid for cold water meter replacements and radio reading devices installation to sole bidder, Hydro Supply Company at $2,423,084.00. Motion seconded by Member Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for Police Professional Liability Insurance to sole bidder, St. Paul Companies at $29,145.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for public officials liability insurance to recommended low bidder, National Union Fire Insurance Company at $16,764.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *RESOLUTION APPROVED AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG) Member Smith introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Maetzold and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement between the. City and the County be terminated and a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 1996, and that the Mayor and the City Manager /Administration be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Resolution adopted. MAYOR RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING YORK AVENUE COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY, AGREEMENT NUMBER PW- 17 -11 -96 Engineer Hoffman reported the Cooperative Construction Agreement is the standard whereby the County and City split construction costs for the project. The Agreement stipulates the maintenance responsibilities for the project. Staff has reviewed the Agreement and finds the normal policy construction splits have been used and the appropriate maintenance items have been specified. The project has been bid by Hennepin County and is on a "fast - track" for approval so the project can begin in late June as suggested in the public hearings. The cost split for the project results in estimated expenditures of $660,428.00 for the County share of and the City share being $408,176.00 (including the Southdale property). Staff recommends Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign the Cooperative. Construction Agreement. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, agreement for participation in the construction of County State Aid Highway No. 31 between West 69th Street and West 66th Street, Hennepin County Project No. 9237, Agreement No. PW17- 11 -96, has been prepared and presented to the City. WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 9237 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades, and cross sections for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 31, within the limits of the City, as a State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 17- 11 -96, Hennepin County Project No. 9237. ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1996. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF STATE AID FUNDS FOR YORK AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Engineer Hoffman informed Council a resolution authorizing use of municipal state aid funds is necessary in order to expend the funds for the York Avenue Improvement. Staff recommends an amount up to $400,000 be authorized for York Avenue Improvement Project S.A.P. 120- 020-31. This amount should be adequate because a portion of funds for the project will come from special assessments to the benefitted property owners. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 31 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120 -020 -31; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $400,000.00 to apply toward construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation approve this authorization. Motion seconded by Member Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. "FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED: HEARING SET OF MAY 20. 1996, FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT FOR INTERSECTION AT SUSAN AND TRACY AVENUES Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, seconded by Member Maetzold: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT L -38 INTERSECTION OF SUSAN AVENUE AND TRACY AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council: 1. The Chief Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed street improvement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on May 20, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina City Hall to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvement. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published, the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second publication to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting,. and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STREET LIGHTING INTERSECTION OF SUSAN AVENUE AND TRACY AVENUE IMPROVEMENT NO L -38 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, May 20, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. INTERSECTION OF SUSAN AVENUE AND TRACY AVENUE Estimated Cost Improvement L -38 $682.69 or $1283.99 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of proposed improvements includes: Lots 9 and 10, Blk 2, Lot 1, Blk 3, and Lot 1, Blk 4, The Heights Fourth Addition. These properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $170.67 or, $321.00 per assessable lot depending on the location of the street light. Debra Mangen City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. "1996 CONTRACT SETTLED FOR TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 (PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS & CSO'S ) Motion made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the 1996 labor agreement between the City and Local 320 Teamsters representing Public Safety Dispatchers and CSO's. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. ANNUAL MEETING OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES NOTED Manager Rosland reminded Council of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities' 1996 Annual Meeting on May 23, 1996, at the Thunderbird Motel in Bloomington. He encouraged interested parties to communicate their interest in attending to staff so reservations could be made. CLAIMS PAID Member Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 2, 1996, and consisting of 44 pages: General Fund $313,275.64; Community Development Block Grant $10,920.00; Communications $1,483.73; Working Capital $8,510.43; Art Center $16,199.37; Swimming Pool Fund $3,673.46; Golf Course Fund $79,183.56; Ice Arena Fund $11,579.95; Gun Range Fund $415.08; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $22,436.19; Utility Fund $316,506.39; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $1,069.56; Recycling Program $225.76; Liquor Dispensary Fund $236,233.28; Construction Fund $18,781.19; TOTAL $1,040,493.59. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET - JUNE 3, 1996, FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF CERTAIN TERMS OF $6,735,000 MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (VERNON TERRACE PROJECT) Manager Rosland explained the Vernon Terrace Project Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1990 is scheduled to be remarketed on July 1, 1996. The borrower, Ohmega Building Corporation, is requesting the final maturity date of the Bonds be extended. The City must schedule a public hearing to satisfy the requirements of federal income tax law relating to such proposed amendments. Staff recommended a resolution setting a June 3, 1996, hearing date for the proposed amendment of certain terms of $6,735,000 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1990 for the Vernon Terrace Project. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN TERMS OF MULTIFAMILY MORTAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (VERNON TERRACE PROJECT) SERIES 1990 WHEREAS, pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of July 1, 1990, ( "Indenture ") between the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City") and First Trust National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee "), the City issued its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990 (the "Bonds "); WHEREAS, proceeds from the sale of the Bonds were loaned to Ohmega Building Corporation, Minnesota corporation (the "Company "), pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of July 1, 1990 (the "Loan Agreement ") for the purpose of refunding prior bonds of the City issued to finance the acquisition and construction of a multifamily rental housing facility located in the City and known as Vernon Terrace Apartments (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the Bonds are subject to mandatory tender and purchase on July 1, 1996 (the "Mandatory Tender Date "); and WHEREAS, as of July 1, 1993, the Company sold the Project to Ted Bigos who acquired the Project pursuant to a contract for deed; WHEREAS, in connection with the Mandatory Tender Date the Company has proposed certain amendments to the terms of the Bonds, in connection with which the Company is requesting that a public hearing be held to satisfy the requirements of federal income tax law relating to such proposed amendments. BE IT RESOLVED, THAT: 1. This Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the terms of'the Bonds described in the Notice of Public Hearing attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Notice "). 2. The City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized to cause the Notice or a notice in substantially the same form as the Notice to be published not less than fifteen (15) days before the date fixed in the Notice as the date of the hearing in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation of the City. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Smith, Richards Resolution carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. City Clerk REPORT OF CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA SPECIAL ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, MAY 7, 1996 The City Council of Edina, Minnesota, Hennepin County, inspected and compared the summary statements certified by the Election Judges for the General Election for the City of Edina held on' Tuesday, May 7, 1996. The votes cast were certified as follows: Question #1, "Shall the city of Edina issue and sell its general obligation bonds in an amount not exceeding $5,500,000 to provide funds for general park development improvements on its public park lands and facilities" passed with 3,388 voters voting yes and 1,024 voting no. Question #2, "Shall the City of Edina issue and sell its general obligation bonds in an amount not exceeding $2,500,000 to provide funds for development of an indoor ice arena/multipurpose facility at Braemar Arena" passed with 2,662 voters voting yes and 1,737 voting no. SPECIAL ELECTION RETURNS 1996 PARK REFERENDA PCT. NO. QUESTION ONE QUESTION TWO YES NO YES NO 1A 65 56 54 67 1B 239 28 196 71 2 133 26 93 64 3 267 57 227 96 4 185 39 132 91 5 280 65 210 134 6 247 59 193 112 7 122 62 90 93 8 188 77 142 120 9 202 89 158 131 10 218 43 179 82 11 291 59 222 128 12 230 88 179 140 13 66 18 60 23 14 154 61 125 89 15 195 70 168 97 16 137 43 97 82 17 46 32 31 47 18 46 14 37 23 19 77 38. 69 47 TOTAL 3388 1024 2662 1737 May 8, 1996 . REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II.A. FROM: Francis Hoffman ❑ Consent City Engineer ,� Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 May, 1996 Q To Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing Action Q Motion Improvement L -38 Street Lighting - ❑ Resolution Susan Ave. & Tracy Ave. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize street light at the intersection of Susan Avenue and Tracy Avenue if Council determines that the light should be erected. Info /Background: The Engineering Department received a petition signed by 19 residents in the neighborhood of Susan Avenue and Tracy Avenue (see attached copy). The City then contacted NSP to have an overhead street light on a wooden pole installed. After reviewing the area layout, NSP selected 5700 Susan Avenue as the most feasible location to erect the pole and light. The resident at 5700 Susan contacted the City and said they did not want the pole and street light or any wiring on their property. That same day, the resident at 5701 Susan (resident who circulated the petition) contacted the City and said they still wanted the light because they have a hearing impaired family member and the light is necessary for safety reasons. NSP and City staff then put together two different options and cost estimates (see Notice of Public Hearing) for ornamental lighting in this area. Staff recommended in the hearing notice that the neighbors decide on which type of fixture and location of the fixture they would prefer. Since the hearing notice went out staff has received only one call, from the resident at 5700 Susan who stated they still objected to the street light and they planned on contacting the other two neighbors involved to find -out if they wanted the light or not. Staff has reviewed the situation and has determined it would be feasible to erect an ornamental light at 5701 Susan Avenue location with an estimated cost of $321.00 per lot. As such, staff would recommend authorizing the project. ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER TREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations Iisted below. 670 0 l SLL5AY-11 between CORNE.2 O F 17ALW f4e 4— Sa►4SP4yJ AVE LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE • This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE &-ec-5705 1 ?41 � y �✓1V� C� II/1�Qr� 5-7u g 13 �yy-c� Sr. 7 i� AIL? 5 &-., %�6- .��'��. -, G 7 3 %sic y 'I'-V X3&04' a 44R A s;ftJh-C— T901 Su--cv4A AA-, 9qj� 77318' NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE L /] OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 9�_�Q�iND�cN 7i:Z T)qA(-,-1 T�i^1 / .► � ,c.._ -r�tr ors. ' Y <l P� _ .� � �P /LN.�.�D � �fl,�s .57c!o .S�s�+a �9 ✓�. 6: J. -=fgyr- t- 1t- /Ct��c _✓ �� G hEc/ ram ,S 7Lao Wtl a7d >; lel OWNER'S PHONE qLl y -ago g- 7 3Y 07 L- � cr q 3 yy� s�va 9yl -5zoc S7 /T Susao .4v(- 77 s Si.2G S�, s4�, C1�3 • l y� C= � Z/ /- S -// 67-7 /,,;LS ALx I Y l- -a 3 V 91r1A, fL11 'L 111,01 oe - o Hfv .3y May 10, 1996 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STREET LIGHTING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT L- 38 Intersection of Tracy Avenue and Susan Avenue City of Edina As you may recall, a petition for street lighting at the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Susan Avenue was brought around your neighborhood for signatures. The Edina City Council has authorized the Engineering Department to proceed with a Public Hearing for this improvement. The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, May 20, 1996 at 7:00 PM to consider street lighting at this intersection. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. After discussions with NSP, the following options were suggested. Option one would involve underground wiring from the back corner of 5700 Susan to the front corner of this lot with either a 30' high fiberglass pole and a 4' arm, or an 18' pole with an ornamental fixture. This option would cost approximately $682.69 or $170.67 per assessable lot. Option two would cost more due to underground wiring from behind 5700 Susan crossing the street to 5701 Susan with the same pole and fixture choices as in option one. The approximate cost of this option would be $1,283.99 or $321.00 per lot. The staff recommendation is to let the neighbors decide which type of fixture they would prefer and at which location. If the decision is made to install the street light, the work would be done this spring or summer. Normal City policy is to assess the four properties which are adjacent the street light. The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvement includes: Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 4, The Heights Fourth Addition. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownershp is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call Candy Fiedler or myself at 927 -8861 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you, Francis J. Hoff n, E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 5817 !----- 1- - - -- L----- 1 - - - --� \ ------- I I I I 6613 I 6612 \\ I 5716 I 5712 I 5708 I 5704 I 5700 ' 6617 \/ 6616 5720 II � I a - \ =LOTS TO BE ASSESSED LOIS LA X =LOTS SIGNING PETITION I I I 6621. X I 6620 i \ \� / 5721 5717 5713 5709 I 5705 I 5701 I —__ - - - - -- 5725 I I_-- a a 6701 X I 6700 c� j j / I I I I I I I - - -� EXSIST G--- - -___� -- - - - - -- / POWER 'POLE I 6705 I 6704 ' I I I � I _-- - - - - -� / 5728 I 5729 I 5720 I 5716 I 5712 I 5708 I I 5709 I I 5700 i, --- --- - -I OPTION' 1 I - - - - - -- - - - - -1— ---- 1- - - - - -� - - - - -I— -- - -I - -- // I 6709 I 6708 I I I SUSAN AVE I---- - - - --1 ----- - - - -I. ---- -I - - -- --T -- I - �--- - - -T-- I I .OPTION' 2 I I----- I I I I 6713 I 6712 M3 I 5729 I 5725 I 5721 5717 I 5713 I 5709 I 5705 I 5701 I I I I I I I 1 I ---- L---- J----- I----- �----- I 1----- I I J---- J----- I 1- 6717 - - -- �` I 6716 I I I I - -1 - -- I I I I I I------- I I I I I I I I I ( I I 5716 I I 5712 I 5708 I 5709 5700 1 6721 I 6720 5808 I 5809 I 5800 I 5720 I I I I I I I I ► I . 5700 Susan Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55439 -1351 May 14, 1996 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Dear Sir or Madam: Re: Notice of Public Hearing Street Lighting Proposed Improvement L -38. This letter is "in response to the petition for street lighting at the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Susan Avenue. If the Stewart family finds it necessary to have the street light installed, we reluctantly choose option two which states that the pole and light will be placed on the northeast corner of the Stewart's lot at 5701 Susan Avenue with an assessed fee of $321.00 per lot. Whatever the outcome, we did not initiate the action, and we DO NOT wish to have any pole and light placed in our yard. When the petition was presented to us by Mrs. Stewart, we queried her about possible locations for the street light; Mrs. Stewart wasn't able to answer the question at that time. Trying to be a cooperative neighbor, we signed the petition with the understanding that we would be involved in the planning.process and would be notified before any action was taken. Unfortunately this did not happen. Returning home from work, we were surprised to find a NSP marker driven in the southeast corner of our lot. After discussing this surprise with Mr. and Mrs. Stewart and calling NSP, we ascertained that this marker designated the planned location for the installation of an unsightly cedar pole, accompanying overhead wires traversing the east side of our lot and the attached street light. We do not feel that this initial process was handled properly by either the Stewarts or the City of Edina. The described events have caused us many hours of concern and have required effort and loss of work time. The Notice of Public Hearing letter stated that the properties considered to be benefited by the improvement would be assessed for the light. We do not consider the light an improvement; we have lived at 5700 Susan Avenue for nearly ten years and have never found a need to have a street light on the corner. Our bedroom windows are on the southeast corner of our house and we do not want the light shining in our windows. If this.light had been on this corner ten years ago, we would not have purchased this house. Sincerely, Barbara A. Parks Richard J. Parks (612) 829 -7558 (home) e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # I I I. A. B . & C. FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA DATE: May 20, 1996 ® To Council SUBJECT: Z -96 -1 and S -96 -2, Final Action Motion Rezoning R -1 to PCD -3, 6716,20,24 Xerxes Avenue; Final Plat ® Resolution Approval, 6801 -6823 York Avenue, and n Ordinance Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Jerry's Enterprises 0 Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Final Rezoning, Final Plat and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan with the following conditions: 1. Dedication of additional York Avenue right -of -way. 2. Landscape screening of York Avenue parking. 3. Extension of fence in northeasterly portion of the site easterly to property line then south for 30 feet along Xerxes Avenue. 4. Landscaping Performance Bond. 5. Modification of path from Xerxes Avenue to meet ADA requirements Information /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. theSxisting house. The proposed lots remain as originally proposed. It Larsen concluded the revised proposal allows for a more logical developme t of the new lot by allowing the building site to move forward. If the new home's gar used the alley for access and only living space existed along the east property line t inimum setback would be 10 feet and would provide adequate space between homes. tnew lot were reduced in width below 75 feet only a five foot setback would be req ed. Mr. Larsen said approval should be dwnditi:or�ed on: a. Abandonment of existing drive and constru existing house, and b. New lot be limited to acc isjo alley with ni a.� The proponent, Mr. Slater was present. ew aaraue. east of the cut Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen rf. #ie man fe gall the closest the City has allowed a garage to be constructed to a prop" line>len said he can only recall one instance where a variance was granted.:: three f -d .,. end that was for a 1.5 foot variance from a side property line. on . d c" OH7 -lot near : e creek in east Edina. X. Commissioner Byron acknowledged is now for 6 feet. Mr. Larsen responded ft Commissioner Byron moved to conditions. ;;;Commission s.... i rkinger carried. «'< II. NEW B ASS: .............. I ....... ......... Residential to Commercial if the variance t division approval sDb, ect to staff motion. All voted aye; rmption Final Rezoning Approval and Final Plat Approval Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies 6716, 6720 and 6724 Xerxes Avenue South 2 Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council granted preliminary approval for the proposed redevelopment at its April 15, 1996, meeting. The proponents have returned and are presenting plans for final approval of the rezoning, plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Larsen explained the plans presented for final approval illustrat0.:::.:a reduced total gross floor area and a reduction in on-site parking. The floo.tareabf: he ......... ....... ........... ere supermarket has been reduced by 1,150 square feet to:: ::a new fid .... 0r:::: 0 f 65,700 .......... 0 ............ square feet. The attached retail building has been redub"ed in'sitti$66. ::8,550 square ...... ...... .......... . . .. .......... . .. spaces q::.pi i.:, ....... The feet to 8,000 square feet. Parking is reduced by eigh t spaces. ...... . . .. ..... required parking is 561 spaces. Thus, the proposa...l..:.. C. ontinue...s...i!tO request ...... space variance as granted with preliminary rezoning Continuing, Mr. Larsemp htbd X lemain e Edina out another change to the plan is that Hirshfields where it is, and:..:.th ... :: Ed' Liquor Store will be relocated into the building attach::"e':'..d..,...to."...th!P Cub Food site. .................. ...................... .......... Mr. Larsen noted in addition to final utility and gradift"'.... .... gplAns .... . ., the proponents .. ............ ............... I ......... have submitted a landscaping plan and schiedulei::and parkin '''I t lighting plan. The final site plan illustrates a revised main entry_ to On -site traffic . conflicts. The plan is presently being rev'16 dt""Neh tiepin C ounty. Mr. Larsen said the proposed $f ndscqpihg em ...... ft "' ..... p.: aides new plantings along the .......... east and north. The proponent&iihd . i .. Ue presented plan:". 9 which are consistent with those '6 of the Zoning Ordinance. The given preliminary approval and :.,M h ..e t e6t t e..r.....q'uireme.A.... An par y variances for parking setback d park the same as in the preliminary P lan. :XXIIIII. .. ..... ...... ......................... . ..... . ........... ..... recommends nc:lu:d': ..... ... ands the Amendment to the Comprehensive mi. L"6n co d ... ... staff recomme Plan, Final ::Reigning . ... ...... and .';. F . 1 . ft . PlOtApproval subject to the following conditions: n.. (A ..0 1 Dedic.ati" o 0' ght70f-Wa &" York Avenue improvements. 2. Landscape *MftFI.IQ9:,,9f parking along York Avenue. 3. landscaping fteft*.o ce Bond. 4. Extens ion of lth nee in the northeasterly portion of the site easterly to the property line thdn south for 30 feet, at a fence height of six feet. ......... ..... X_ Modification ofOath from Xerxes to meet ADA (handicapped access) standards. lent, Mr. Robert Shadduck, Jerry's Enterprises was present. Mr. John Iso present representing Jerry's Enterprises. - Commissioner Ingwalson informed the Commission he is abstaining from the discussion and vote. 3 Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Larsen where the reduction in the building occurs on the proposed Cub Food store. Mr. Larsen said the reduction in the proposed Cub Food Store is a north /south reduction. Chairman Runyan asked if the proponent has decided on the type of material that will be used for the proposed fence. Mr. Larsen said the fence is to be a solid fence that maintains privacy for the abutting property owner, and will prevent debris and litter from blowing into the residential lot. It is believed the fence w t be constructed of wood. .... ..................... Commissioner Faust questioned if more pi along the berm. Mr. Larsen said the developer h be planted along the berm. Mr. Larsen noted the Chairman Runyan questioned the length of existing berm will extend to the northerly property Commissioner Workinger questioned standard to the last house is adequate in p. residential property. Mr. Larsen said staff:':w lighting plan, adding the proponent is:aiare residential neighbor. Chairman Runyan a: hour operation. Mr. Larsen and poi their ca res Mr. S the ergreen tree�S": n11ba;Planted licated ;:dine /ev Egr n-trees< dep dt 39 conifisr '' series::::.. Mr. Larsen said the eves :the::aetiaack from the light ht wash W. m entering that areful iii reviewing the proposed i' e)q ressed by the 3sed Cub Food operation is a 24 24 hours per day. she ha;ia concern with the area of the loading docks, for refrigerated trucks to idle while waiting to unload °:;noise problems for the residential property owners. oading docks have been moved further from the reduce any noise impact. ;ommissioner 1EUonger questioned Mr. Larsen if he believes there could be cross -over front Key Cadillac into, and out of the site. Mr. Larsen ledged there,: ould be some migration. Commissioner Swenson asked how this in could be.b.revented. Mr. Larsen said unless a fence in constructed there is readily:aailable at present to prevent cross -over. : <Ir#ohn Johannson, representing the proponents, addressed the Commission pointing out the following changes in the plan: 1)reduction in square.footage of Cub store and retail shop, 2)four lot plat, 3)the liquor store and Hirshfields have been flip - flopped. (this change from the original proposal includes an amendment stating if the 4 location of the Edina Liquor store after a five year period of time is found to be unsatisfactory the liquor store will be relocated at no expense to the City). Mr. Johansen noted the Hirshfield lease expires in five years. Continuing, Mr. Johansen said the fourth change includes the planting of more evergreen trees, and filling in the existing gaps on the berm with additional plantings. Concluding Mr. Johannson, in response to the expressed concern of possible vehicle cross -over from Key Cadillac, said it may be possible to construct a fence along the common property line y-or add some form of vehicle barrier that would prevent cross -over. Commissioner Swenson moved to recomme amendment to the Comprehensive Plan subject to; Avenue improvements, 2)landscaping screening of increase in plantings along the Xerxes Avenue bet, Bond, 4)extension of the fence in the northeasterly property line then south for 30 feet, staff is to work fence, 5)modification of path from Xerxes Avenue 1 standards. Commissioner Byron seconded the me four lot plat. Commissioner Swenson accepted #hi Swenson, Workinger, Runyan. Nays; 0, Akilst > €{ P -96 -2 S -96 -3 Generally Located:'.. Final Si hr�al rez o� n"" al plat, and Iedicationvf[f�vay for Y rking alt7ng York : 'V ue. and;€ ial Lakes Office Phase I Third Addition. Centennial Lake ip, Hedberg Estate, John and Jean Hedberg, lopment and Edina HRA Avenue and north of Minnesota Drive sm .. 'ter. «> Mr. Larsen said the City Council, or t$eptember 5, 1995, approved a revised #±. Plan for thundeveloped portions of he Centennial Lakes mixed use ol- tr[ent` f`e revised plan calls for five office buildings containing a floor area of ajrate)y'1, 160,000 square feet. Total site area is about 25 acres and would also inclutte` .'storm water pond surrounded by public park Mr. Larsen explained the proponents have submitted.,plans and are requesting Final Site Plan approval for Phase I of the development. Ttfafirst phase calls for a six 5 LOCAi1C8N MAP zl H. G FLIIRVI I SOOT OALE,•' J ! Y .v b 5 T,, 1 Q � Q C � 0 � w SOUTHOALE � SHOPPING CENTER 1 Y Q O a 9 O fN. r- L � r E cE ■ • • • % .■ � • • ■ a ones REZONING /FINAL DEVEL. NUMBER LOCATION REQUEST Z -96 -1 and 5 -96 -2 PLAN 6716/20/24 Xerxes Avenue and 6803/05 6775 York Avenue Multi- Property Redevelopment -EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 1, 1996 STAFF REPORT Z -96 -1 Final Rezoning Approval and Final Plat Approval S -96 -2 Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies 8< Comp. Plan Amendment 6716, 6720 and 6724 Xerxes Avenue South Residential to Commercial General Location: East of York Avenue and north of West 69th Street The City Council granted preliminary approval for the proposed redevelopment at its April 15, 1996, meeting. The proponents have returned and are presenting plans for final approval of the rezoning, plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Changes from Preliminary Plan The plans presented for final approval illustrate a reduced total gross floor area and a reduction in on -site parking. The floor area of the supermarket has been reduced by 1,150 square feet to a new floor area of 65,700 square feet. The attached retail building has been reduced in size from 8,550 square feet to 8,000 square feet. Parking is reduced by eight spaces to 554 spaces. The required parking is 561 spaces. Thus, the proposal continues to request a seven space variance as granted with preliminary rezoning. In addition to final utility and grading plans, the proponents have submitted a landscaping plan and schedule and parking lot lighting plan. The final site plan illustrates a revised main entry designed to reduce on -site traffic conflicts. The plan is presently being reviewed by Hennepin County. The proposed landscaping emphasizes new plantings along the east and north property lines. The existing berm along Xerxes Avenue would be maintained with additional Spruce trees added to improve screening and appearance. The berm would be extended to the northeasterly comer of the site then westerly to the rear lot line of the adjacent single dwelling unit lot. An eight foot high fence would follow the top berm. to screen the home from the loading docks. The proposed landscaping plan conforms to Ordinance requirements, except along York Avenue. Additional screening of the parking along York Avenue would be required to fully comply with landscaping and screening standards. The proposed parking lot lighting plan illustrates box style, downward directed fixtures on 25 foot standards. The lights are equipped with difusers which can eliminate or minimize light wash to neighboring properties. The proposed exterior finish for the supermarket is unchanged from the preliminary plan. Exterior materials are colored split face block and stucco /drivet which comply with code requirements. The final plan has the City Liquor Store and Hirschfields changing places from that shown on the preliminary plan. City staff is presently reviewing exterior material options which would further the store's identity. No decision has been made, but materials would comply with Ordinance standards. Recommendation The proponents have presented plans which are consistent with those given preliminary approval and meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The variances for parking setback and parking quantity are the same as in the preliminary plan. Staff recommends the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of right-of-way for York Avenue improvements. 2. Landscape screening of parking along York Avenue. 3. Landscaping Performance Bond. 4. Eidension of the fence in the northeasterly portion of the site easterly to the property line then south for 30 feet, at a fence height of six feet. 5. Modification of path from Xerxes to meet ADA (handicapped access) standards. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 1996 TO: Ken Rosland FROM: David Velde SUBJECT: Country Store Garbage Area On April 16, 1996, 1 inspected the garbage storage area behind the Country Store on York Avenue. There was no sign of running water but there was a rut in the parking lot from the compactor container to the storm sewer catch basin. There were puddles of water located along the rut which could have accumulated from the recent rain and snow on Sunday and Monday or from washing down the area around the compactor. The area around the compactor was fairly clean and free of litter. On April 17, 1996, 1 inspected the garbage storage area again and found the area around the compactor to be relatively free of litter. The parking lot was dry and there was a small sweeper cleaning the parking lot and the area around the dumpster. About five years ago I received complaints about the odors from the compactor and from the water running under the compactor into the catch basin. At that time it appeared that they were trying to keep the area free of leakage from the compactor by continuously running water from a hose under the compactor container. I asked the Country Store to replace the compactor container with a sealed container, which they did. Since then, I have received no other complaints. about odors or liquid flowing into the storm sewer catch basin. �u opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be' necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. A -179 Recycle /mill Streets & New Bituminous Surfacing, Hildale Area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That Improvement A -179 Recycle /mill Streets & New Bituminous Surfacing Hildale Area is hereby ordered as proposed. 2. Plans and specifications prepared by City Engineer, Francis Hoffman, a copy of which plans and specifications which is on file in the office of the City Clerkarehereby approved. 3. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted-:In the officEal paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved:plans:and specifications. ;> Adopted this 15 day of April, 1996. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Rollcatl: Members Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Member Kelly abstained. Member Kelly stated her opinion that the City should consider some type oi! ordinance or method of charging people for damage to streets done by heavy equipment brought into neighborhood for use in construction projects. Engineer Hoffman explained the City does charge.. for damage td Ciiy?Streets and has a process in place for issuing permits and checking for damage .: *STREET RECYCLING /MILLING NEW BITUMINOUS SURFACING IMPROVEMENT A -180 ( SUNNYSLOPE ROAD EAST SUNNYSLOPE ROAD WEST, WOODHILL WAY,! DALE DRIVE, RIDGE PLACE, HILLTOP LANE) CONTINUED TO MAY 6, 1996 Motion made.:by Member:. °Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to continue to May 6, 1996, the public hearing for street recycling /milling new bituminous surfacing improvement A -180 on Sunnyslope Road East,: Sunnystope Road West, Woodhill Way, Dale Drive, Rid g�' Place, Hilltop Lane. Motion carried -on rolicall vote:: -.fve ayes. UBLIC HEARING: HELD: PRELIrnINARY REZONING GRANTED FROM SINGLE DWELLING UNIT ' ;;�s`` DISTRICT TO PCD "PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED FOR PARTS OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 629 AND LOTS 5, 6. AND 7. BLOCK 2 YORK TERRACE AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, WELSH COMPANIES AND CITY OF EDINA Affidavitsof. Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner:Larsen informed Councif the proposed redevelopment includes all properties located between the Wick's .Fumiture site and the Key Cadillac site. The project area includes three existing single dwelling properties fronting Xerxes:Avenue. The proposed rezoning affects only the three residential properties, since-i'.66. remaining property is currently zoned PCD-3. The total project area is 8.76 acres. The redevelopment wouldsemove all existing buildings except the retail building on the southerly portion of the site.' :. Planner L.arsenreviewed the proposed redevelopment area that contains a supermarket (66,850 s.f.) with an attached retail space for Hirshfields (8,550 s.f.), and an expanded retail mall (38,385 s.f.), on the southerly portion of the site. The City's Liquor Store would move to the space now occupied by Hirshfields. Planner Larsen continued, the proposed buildings comply with Zoning Ordinance setback requirements of 50 feet along the easterly property line. Along the north and south property lines the City Code requires no setback since adjacent uses are zoned commercial. The required setback for panting is 20 feet along York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. The proposal provides 20 feet along York Avenue, but it is less than 20 feet in some areas along Xerxes Avenue. At the far northeasterly portion of the site the setback is 15.85 feet, requiring a 4.15 foot parking setback variance. The redeveloped site would have a total floor area of 113,758 square feet requiring 569 parking spaces. The proposed plan illustrates 562 spaces which requires a seven space variance. Planner Larsen reminded Council Hennepin County is scheduled to reconstruct this section of York Avenue in 1996. The proposed site plan conforms to the approved design for York Avenue. The principal access point will be at a signalized intersection in the central portion of the site. Other access to the sight will be limited to right turns in /right turns out. No access to Xerxes Avenue is suggested by the redevelopment plan. Planner Larsen added the redevelopment requires replatting the property to accommodate1he new building arrangements and ownership. The plat would create a separate parcel for,the liquor store that the City would own. :: >.. Planner Larsen continued the Planning Commission has reviewed and approved: °with conditions the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat. In addition, staff?supports the' parlunB quantity and.setback variances. Staff believes the mix of uses are complimentary and due to the nature of the dses, believes the panting is adequate for the site. Extending the existing condition on. the northeast side of the: property is also desirable. Although the area gets narrower at the northeast comer ut approximately the_same area exists to landscape. _ ..:................._. Planner Larsen pointed out City of Richfield's notes included inthe Cour idi's'packet. He explained the notes resulted from a neighborhood review meeting held April 9, 1996. Planner:Larsen summarized the notes stating seventeen households attended the meeting and Mr John Johanson. represented the developers. Concems /questions from the residents included the folfdwtinng 1. Curb cuts on Xerxes Avenue. Residents 4" ere rekeved that no: access is proposed for Xerxes Avenue, 2. Noise - Screen HVAC equipment, position away from residential. Deliveries are a concern with diesel refrigerator trucks idling, 3. Lighting - direct all lighting away from residential area, 4. Maintenance - reduce dirt and, litter blowing; into residential area, 5. Berm - residents pleased to: see berm extended..northeriy, would like to see the berm higher an include a break for a walking path. Plant treesvritls;sufficient caliper to provide an immediate screen, . . 6. Crime::- residents see: .theTedevelopment project as potential for increased crime, Richfield an Edina need': to work with' area residents to collaborate on this concern, an .................... 7. Property Values.. concern. with; potential for decline in value. Planner Larsen met with the Richfield staff to address the residents' concerns as they relate to City Code, i.e., curb cuts, noise U§Ning :berm,and informed Council the residents' concerns had been delivered to the developer. He :: introduced :Btuce;Palmborg, Richfield Community Development Director. Planner :Larsen concluded staff:' recommends: 1) approval of the proposed preliminary rezoning of 6716, 6720 and 6724 Xerxes Avenue conditioned upon Final Rezoning and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan (residential to commercial), 2) Preliminary Plat approval replatting all of the property to reflect the new ownership conditioned upon Final Plat approval and dedication of right -of -way on York Avenue at the soutf�westerty comer of the property conforming to the County Plan for reconstruction of York Avenue; and 3) Final >. Development :Plan Approval reflecting the proposed redevelopment of the property, subject to Final Rezonngand finatPlat approval. Proponent Presentation John Johanson, Welsh Companies, introduced Bob Shadduck from Jerry's Enterprises, Greg Kopiske from the civil engineering firm of Westwood, and Craig Meuwissen from Planmark Architects. Mr. Johanson stated the developer's goal was to combine several adjacent properties to make a modem attractive, synergistic shopping center. Mr. Johanson stated the developers believe the current site improvements do not meet with what should be done on the site. Their proposal makes the site into a very clean attractive functional shopping center. He added the development is a joint project between the Welch Companies and Jerry's Enterprises. Jerry's Enterprises currently operates the existing Country Store on the site. Mr. Johanson explained the existing grocery store, the Northwest Book Store and the Edina Liquor Store will be demolished and a Cub Foods of roughly 68,000 s.f. constructed in place of the Country Store. The liquor store or similar use would be attached to the Cub Foods and Northwestern Book would be relocated into the existing Yorkdale Shop strip center. A small expansion on the end of the strip center to accommodate a new tenant is planned. One of the developers' goals with the project is to accomplish the redevelopment of the-shopping center while York Avenue is under construction thus limiting the construction impact to once. Mr. Johanson said the developers would move the Edina Liquor Store at their cost, hopefully on a one or at most two day schedule. Improvements planned for the site include improved signage such as a multi tenant sign for the Yorkdale Shops on York Avenue, improved drainage, possible sprinkler installation to the Yorkdale Shops, upgraded berm, landscape and maintenance, installation of a high berm between the site and residential properties, and a new parking lot for 70 -80% of the site. Bob Shadduck, Jerry's Enterprises, stated the proposed Cub Foods is very similar to the Cub Foods located at 60th Street and Nicollet Avenue. He continued the interior operation of.th6 store is different that many of Cub Stores currently in operation. The store will have a perishableside of theatd[e and a dry side. It will be a smaller store than the corporate Cub stores being operatedan other areas Mr Shadduck stated his intention to be sensitive to the residential neighbors, minimizing noise, clutter andtrccktraffic to the back of the store situated toward another commercial site. Bruce Palmborg, Director of Community Development, thanked :Edina staff for notifying: Richfield of the ........................ proposed development. This allowed the residents from the area to meet and discuss their concerns over the proposal. He suggested the residents have some expectations: because: of that meeting and noted some residents were present to make their concems known. Public Comment ...... . Elizabeth Olson, 6712 Xerxes Avenue, voiced her concern' W th the redevelopment. The developers will ........... demolish three homes next to her. She lives on the north MOO.bf:the sitaand noise is a problem with the trucks idling while waiting to be unloaded. Ms. Olson wanted to. know how she will be compensated since ... she feels her property will lose value with the.:redevelopment. Ms> Olson asked for clarification of access, landscaping, fencing and operational issue swith Jerry's Enterprises. She expressed concern with safety during the construction process. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Shadduck to respond to the::concems raised by Ms. Olson. Mr. Johanson displayed a graphic of the site and showed the area between Ms. Olson's and the proposed redevelopment. He stated the developers' i .. too install a fence of approximately ten feet designed to Ms. Olson's specifications and Vaced as she: diirects. The developer offered to meet with Ms. Olson to discuss her ...................... concems. ...... Mayor Richards as ii a Developers ... Agceement were part of this proposed redevelopment. Planner Larsen respondedthat most: issues would be covered under the normal building permit, but a developer's agreement will, be important:also to cover these issues. Mayor Richards urged Ms. Olson to meet with the developers!and make her issues known. Michaelftessen, 6729 Xerxes Avenue, stated he lives directly across from the proposed redevelopment. Mr. Ressen requested the following items be added to the proposal: require an impact study be performed on thekcal area at the expense of the developers to determine the effects and changes in property value in the immediate and surrounding area to be completed before issuing any further authorization to proceed with thisdexeiopment including but not limiting to the following factors: the increase in noise pollution, the effects k6:6: rimetaal lot and building lighting on the surrounding homes and properties, the effects of noise generateddue`to the location of the delivery docks and the truck route to access the docks, the effects of litter and garbage on the neighborhood property and the effects of the Cub Foods structure built with unobstructed sight lines of the area homes. He also asked the Council to look at possible increases in crime. Upon completion of the impact study, Mr. Ressen, asked that changes be required to the development plan minimizing the effects of each area of concern. Mr. Ressen stated he was speaking on his personal behalf, that he was not representing the area residents, but felt many would concur with his concems. He presented his preferred summarized course of action: requiring the developers and owners of the property proposed for redelopment, to pay each affected resident an amount to reimburse the said lost equity of their home and property to predevelopment values into an escrow account which would be payable including any accrued interest at the time of closing should any land owner decide to sell their property. The escrow account should be established at an institution agreed upon by all property owners. Mr. Ressen would also like to require a retaining wall starting the northern comer at the edge of the paved lot at a height of about twenty feet westerly toward the loading dock as far as possible. He would like to see it as far as the point of the docks and again southerly to a point at least equal to the store structure itself. At that point the wall height may be allowed to decline and meld into a berm that should be high enough so that any person standing on Xerxes Avenue cannot see cars in the parking lot. From the wall on the property a slope or terraced landscape development descending down to the street at Xerxes. Also, landscape plantings of adequate maturity should be planted. Heights should be no less than twelve feet and tree choice should be evergreens if possible to screen the store structure and parking lot from Xerxes. Mr. Ressen stated he lives across the street and currently sees three homes, but the redevelopment will place the store in his sight line. He requested a commitment from both Edina and Richfield public safety for additional police patrol to prevent any increase in crime. He also requested that :curb cuts be prohibited now and forever on Xerxes Avenue and the developer make public any undisclosed.plans. Mr. Ressen asked for a summary in writing of all requirements to be implemented before?the Councifs :authorization to proceed with the development was granted. James Halvorsen, 6700 Xerxes Avenue, concurred with the previous speaker. He repeated that. r d'vehicle entrance/exits be allowed on Xerxes both during and after construction;no loading docksbeituated toward I . : : : : :: : ..............;. Xerxes or other residential neighborhoods. Mr. Halvorsen stated':Jeny`s Enterprises hasan open sewer running from their garbage disposal to a storm sewer in the middle>ofthe parking lot year round. He said there is water running and always a terrible odor. When the'vrinds'prevail from the southwest in the summer, residents to the north must stand the rotten smell. Loading -docks next to the residential neighborhood places diesel trucks with their refrigeration units rummng:...p ng the night. Mr. Halvorsen reported the site is currently bordered by a deteriorating fence :that over -the;years the neighbors have had to maintain. He observed Key Cadillac employees have; made Xerxes into `a single lane street both by parking and testing cars on it. Ken Amundson, 6733 Xerxes Avenue, stated his house is directty:across from the "Proposed Rezoning" sign. He voiced concern with primarily noise; since that:the proposed store will be approximately 33% larger than the existing store. This size increase will increase truck traffic a great deal. Trucks typically come in the early morning hours. The proposed route for trucks at the new store will have any trucks that are waiting to be unloaded idling outside his bedroom windows at 4:30.4:6 Mr. Amundson urged that sound barriers .......................... i : :: be required to stop the sound from carrying into the tesidential neighborhood. He stated he was agreement with his neighbor „Mr. Ressen's proposal for a. foot wall. In addition, Mr. Amundson expressed .... concern with ting :;spilling into: the: neighborhood, with declining property values and urged a study be done to ascertain the negative impact on the surrounding properties. Gerald Coleman, 6704 :Xerxes Avenue; stated he agreed with his neighbors. He added that traffic down Xerxes has been: an.l1ssue The: new store. will increase traffic and Mr. Coleman asked that stops signs e .... .::.:.::::.:::::::::. installed on Xerxes Avenue ::::;. : : : : : : : : :! :;:::::. Harriet Phillips, 6809 Xerxes :Avenue, asked if the developers plan truck traffic for the east side of the proposed store, and is construction going to take place during night time hours. She agreed with Mr. Halvorson's complaint about:the smell from the open sewer. Ms. Phillips asked if Edina had some kind of ordinance restricting the time semi could deliver to the store. Mayor Richards :asked the proponents to address the hours of construction, the traffic planned for the easterlyggrt on of.the site and that the planner respond to the question regarding City Code. Mr. Johannes responded.ca hstruction would only take place during daytime hours. He stated any night time work would be inside the store. He added they have absolutely no interest in curb cuts on Xerxes and intend to construct barriers keeping vehicles out of the walkway and landscaped area. Mr. Shadduck confirmed the east side of the building is the proposed truck route to the loading docks. The developers will time trucks to arrive so there should be no need to have stacked semis waiting to unload. The existing facility's truck traffic and activity are in the northeast comer on the Richfield side of the building. He continued the complaints with the dumpsters will be eliminated because the redevelopment has a sealed garbage system. Member Smith asked Mr. Shadduck to further speak to the open sewer. Mr. Shadduck replied that he believes what is referred to is an open dumpster and not a sewer. Planner Larsen informed Council that the only noise ordinance the City has would be the State noise standards limiting any noise from occurring for a prolonged period. Nancy Barr, 6620 Xerxes Avenue, agreed with the previous speakers. She asked if the developers ever considered buying the fourth house to increase the distance between the commercial and residential areas. Ms. Barr said she understood how development occurs but urged consideration be given to neighborhood concerns. Council Discussion /Action Mayor Richards asked if any parking restrictions currently exist on Xerxes Avenue..::.. Planner Larsen responded he was not aware of any restrictions. Member Maetzold added he thought parking was restricted from the west side of Xerxes. Planner Larsen will verify the status of parking..-- ................... Member Smith asked the present width of the parking lot stalls. vs:: the pvposeidth. Planner Larsen stated existing parking stalls are nine feet in width. Member S.- ith also ask ed:ttte Overall building height at the top of the entrance's "Cub Foods" sign and if the signs meet City Code;,:... Ti a prgportent replied' height was approximately 35 feet high. Planner Larsen added theprnposed signs meet CityCade: Member Smith emphasized his concern with the noise issue oh1hts:site. It appears screening will be dealt with between the developers and neighbors. He indicated That lighting appears to be addressed by the planning staff He added his hope this site does not result in a "IDne° house: in a commercial area. Member Maetzold voiced concern with noise, especially,for Ms. Olson:;:; Member Maetzold asked what happens if the property owner and developer cannot agree ;Planner Larsen?fesponded the developer must meet City Code requirements. Member Maetzold _continued :asking if a barrier would be required to keep the redevelopment area separate from the Key:Cadillac p6ddng end finally will there be disabled access to the foot path from Xerxes. Planner Larsen replied parking would' 6e an operation decision up to the developers. He added the foot path if constructed would be requredto meet ADA standards. Member Paulus submitted while three residential homes changing status, the commercial development has existed for some time. She pointed.: out' the redevelopment -W. it clean up and improve the area and the project is positive. Member Paulus also observed1he developers still need to work out the issues with the neighbors. »: Mayor Richards agreed the proposed redevelopment is an improvement to the area. He added the concerns and issues raised; this evening will be; defined and hopefully, resolved in a satisfactory manner to those ss- concerned by the-time :firial: approvals are granted. Member Smith move d:approval: of First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 A-6 approving the rezoning of the property.at6716, 6720:and t724. Xerxes Avenue, conditioned upon Final Rezoning and Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan!aii follows: ORDINANCE NO. 850-A7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (PCD -3) FROM SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICT (R -1) THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: ._ ..... Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Commercial District (PCD-3) Is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lots 5, 6 and 7, YORK TERRACE The extent of the Single Dwelling District (R -1) is reduced by removing the property described REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: May 20, 1996 SUBJECT: P -96 -3, Final Development Plan approval, 3917 -3929 West 50th Street. Edina Properties, Inc. Recommendation: Continue public hearing to June 3, 1996. Information /Background: The proponent has requested the continuance. Agenda Item # I I I. F. ® Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Consent III. G. LOCA710MYN MAP r U= IHAR �j • KIN qj ri � M 011 f� ,• •: C:_. �. � t � - � ■ u t ~ MALONEY s s 0 : o v•E w a °y i PEA• r �r _AN C[dErC4r LL Z / w T •11I 3 . •\ MATERr+An arE I II ,'AN ;ALKENBui;G 1 PAR K W` �. i - •_ •art .�C� •� LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -96 -2 L O C A T 10 N 6600 Belmore Lane EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 1, 1996 7:30 P.M., EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Commis meeting minut "relocate tr carried. Acting Chairman David F Geof Workinger, Charles Gordon Johnso Craig Lars�i;"Jackie is r Faust moved to recc Commissioner Swenso Commissioner Workii�4er OLD BUSINESS: gin, Nan Faust, n Swenson lellan , Craig of the March 27, 1996, nge to the minutes to strike Ebn. All voted aye; motion Mr. Larsen. asked the Commission to recall they considered and tabled the R# :at their::lrch 27, 1996, meeting. The proponent was given time to consider s' €c. could reduce the impact of existing improvements on the new building Mr. Larsen said the proponent has returned with a plan which would abandon the existing garage and driveway and would construct a new garage on the east side of 1 the existing house. The proposed lots remain as originally proposed. Mr. Larsen concluded the revised proposal allows for a more logical development of the new lot by allowing the building site to move forward. If the new home's garage used the alley for access and only living space existed along the east property line the minimum setback would be 10 feet and would provide adequate space between homes. If the new lot were reduced in width below 75 feet only ;Afi.ve foot setback would be required. Mr. Larsen said approval should be conditioned on: a. Abandonment of existing drive and construction' `.new garac1q.. est of the existin g house, and b. New lot be limited t cc mi o access to alley with no �`rb cut o::' e The proponent, Mr. Slater was present. Commissioner Byron rrtoved to conditions ..;.Commission: >lllf rkinger carried. Residential to Commercial Final I. t division approval subject to staff e motion. All voted aye; motion ng Approval and Final Plat Approval Jerry's Enterprises and Welsh Companies 6716, 6720 and 6724 Xerxes_ Avenue South 2 EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 1, 1996 STAFF REPORT LD -96 -2 Bill Slater 6600 Belmore Lane Request: Lot Line Adjustment The Commission will recall it considered and tabled the request at its March 27, 1996, meeting. The proponent was given time to consider. changes which could reduce the impact of existing improvements on the new building site. The proponent has returned with a plan which would abandon the existing garage and driveway and would construct a new garage on the east side of the existing house. The proposed lots remain as originally proposed. Recommendation The revised proposal allows for a more logical development of the new lot by allowing the building site to move forward. If the new home's garage used the alley for access and only living space existed along the east property line the minimum setback would be 10 feet and would provide adequate space between homes. If the new lot were reduced in width below 75 feet only a five foot setback would be required. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: Abandonment of existing drive and construction of new garage east of the existing house. 2. New lot be limited to access to alley with no curb cut on Belmore. LD -96 -2 EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 27, 1996 6600 Belmore Lane Lots 11, 12, and 13, Block 1, West Minneapolis Heights Plus part of vacated Tyler Avenue Bill Slater The subject division would take three platted lots along with a vacated street and create two building sites. The lot division would create two parcels with the following dimensions and areas: Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Lot Width 75 Feet 87, Feet Lot Depth 148 Feet 148 Feet Lot Area 11,100 s.f. 12,880 s.f. The original plat of this area dates back to 1888. Most of the lots in the plat are 46 feet wide with homes typically built on a lot and a half. As developed the typical lot is 65- 70 feet wide with a lot area of approximately 9,000 square feet. In 1991 a similar lot division was approved to the southwest of this property on Harrison and Van Buren. In that case seven lots were divided to provide four building sites. All the lots have since been developed. Recommendation The proposed lots meet Zoning Ordinance size requirements and are compatible with development patterns in the neighborhood. However, the development and placement of the existing house is a concern. First, in order to get a 75 foot wide lot the new lot line comes within four feet of the existing home. Thus, a setback variance for the existing home is required. Second, the existing driveway impacts the developable area of the new lot. As a result the house pad is forced to the rear portion of the lot. I cannot recommend approval without some adjustment of the existing development on the property. If the existing garage and driveway were abandoned and reconstructed on the east side of the house, there would be increased flexibility for development on _the new lot. tl� — tl I � I :I I I FQAO 112' I rlew Fffr N 89 °59' a — 75.03— OUTL01 AY7V A1Rr "in I 10 I ls'Ar 0 110 `f I - --4— 1^1 f" E 162.24 B DRAINAGE & UTILITYIEASEMENT Lots 11, 12 and 13. Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGH TS, 945 f I Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of said W 1= 11, 12 and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North 29 "ELM 0 I I W" I TYPICAL FBW( a thereof, of as measured at right ongles to the west line of HOUSE PAD I'a '0 LUx 45X55 I I ~ 0 I -- 953 z IvrowER 4 GPR — — pale —75 -- EXISTING HOUSE pv — (1-1/2 STORY FRAME) I 32'wlLOw 12 n m 31 "WLL O SE; 1 75.03 . Fff 1^1 f" E 162.24 B DRAINAGE & UTILITYIEASEMENT Lots 11, 12 and 13. Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGH TS, a O f I Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of said .� 11, 12 and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North I I W" I Outlot B. DEARBORN ADDITION, EXCEPT the west 75.00 feel a thereof, of as measured at right ongles to the west line of W I w said lots, according to the plats thereof on file or of LUx record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for 0 N' I ~ 0 I 0 r W L IvrowER 4 GPR — — pale 3.9 EXISTING HOUSE pv — (1-1/2 STORY FRAME) <I QQr�P ¢ I W � 0] 0 m I I LU I Y'RONwOOD 16-MARE 19-PIE 6.84 I o, y S 89°59' 43" W 161.88 I a„® i BELMORE LANE Revised EXIST PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 11, 12 and 13. Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS; together with that part of Tyler Avenue vacated lying ad1ocent to the East line of said Lots 11, 12 and 13 I ina between the extensions Easl of the North line of sold Lot 11 and the South line of sold lot 13 according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Outlot B, DEARBORN ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. area = 23980 sf / 0.55 ac – — — — – PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS: The west 75.00 feet of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOL'3 HEIGHTS. and The west 75.00 feet of Outlot B. DEARBORN ADDITION, as measured at right angles to the west line of said lots, according to the plots thereof on file or 26.37 of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. area = 11100 S.F. / 0 -25 cc 'a o_ u b 0 0 0 `o n° 3 0 0 C� u 0 I 003 Lots 11, 12 and 13. Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGH TS, a O EXCEPT the west 75.00 feet thereof, with that port of Tyter r yote I Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of said .� 11, 12 and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North line of said Lot 11 and the South line of said lot 13, and Outlot B. DEARBORN ADDITION, EXCEPT the west 75.00 feel thereof, of as measured at right ongles to the west line of W I w said lots, according to the plats thereof on file or of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for 0 N' Hennepin County, Minnesota. 0 r W area - 12880 S.F. / 0.30 cc to 0 0 z NORTH _ 0 30 60 90 120 SCALE IN FEET Ron Krueger & Associates Inc. LAND SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING 5301 EDNA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD EDNA. MINNESOTA 55439 (612) 831 -2989 FAX 831 -3093 v � w v I 15.9, i I W a n N w O Z 12 PON Pwr N 89 °59' 43" E 162.24 2 75.03 OLITLOT B DRAINAGE a UTILITY EASEMENT rat" rte'. 4- - 943= 10 12•APR1: -µeel I Q TYPICAL 10 o I� I > I HOUSE PAD -- 45X55 - -- - - - - - -� 951 _ Ash o= I z9 ao I U) _ t I r�• I 3.9 W EXISTING HOUSE Z PC" — — — — 11 -'/2 STOW rRAW) W — — — — — — — T F a -I - -- 75-----1 — 32.83- — — - J A ti 32'wLLO- W > end J m�e n N 32 —tL O f �'� p R 5-worv*W I$-AARr CATCH SAM • O 75.03 1 1 *"me 86.84 5 89 °59' 43'• w 161.88 CURS BELMORE LANE EXIST PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots it. 12 and 13. Block 1, NEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS; tog:ther with that port of Tyler Avenue vacated lying ad ocenI to the Easl line of sold Lols I1, 12 and 13 IYfnq be�ween the extsnslons Eosl of (he North Ilns of said Lol 11 S I and the South line of sold Lot 13 according to the plot e thereof on file or of record In the Offlcs of the County li IRecorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. I AND Outlet B. DEARBORN ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on Iile or of record In the Office of the County Recorder In and for Hennepin County. Minnesota. area w 23980 el / 0.55 cc 5 PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS: The west 75.00 feet of Lots 11. 12 and 13. Block 1, NEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS, and The west 75.00 feet of Outlot B. DEARBORN ADDITION. as measured at right angles to the west line of so id lots, occordinpp to the plats thereof on file or '— 28.37 of record in the Office of the County Recorder In and for Hennepin County. Minnesota. area w 11100 S.E. / 0.25 oc O y Lots 11. 12 and 13. Block 1, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS, L7 EXCEPT the west 75.00 feel thereof, with that port of T1ler O Avenue vacated lying adjacent to the East line of sold lots x 11, 12 and 13 lying between the extensions East of the North v line of sold Lot 11 and the South line of sold Lot 13, and z Outlet B. DEARMAN ADDITION, EXCEPT the west 75.00 feet there*,, of ae measured at right onglea to the weal Ifne of W said Iota, according to the plats there * / en file or of record in the Olfies of the County Recorder in and for p Hennepin County. Minnesota. O area - 12880 S.F. / 0.30 N O Z NORTH 0 30 60 90 120 SCALE IN FEET Ron Krueger & Associates, ND SUv iZ Inc. PLANNING 5301 FDfL► MSTRBAL BOULEVARD EDf1A, W#,ESOTA 55439 (812) 031 -2989 FAX 631 -3093 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: May 15, 1996 AGENDA N0. ITEM DESCRIPTION: FIRE /EMS STATION IV.A. Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. (see attached) 1 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: James' Steele Construction, $588,700 GENERAL INFORMATION: (see attached) FIRE Signature Departm The Recommended bid is . within budget not witfjin bu get Jo Wallin • Kenneth Rosland, City Manag r MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1996 TO: Mayor and City Council Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief SUBJECT: AWARD OF BIDS -- FIRE /EMS STATION Recommendation is to authorize low bid, "James Steele Construction ", at $588,700.00, less the following three deduct alternatives: Quartz Floor --- - - - - -- $4,300 Emergency Generator -- $12,200 Lockers -------- - - - - -- $3,900 TOTAL: $20,400 These alternatives will provide an additional margin for contingency and may be re- ordered late in the construction process if the project costs remain within budget. As you recall, this project was re -bid following receipt of unacceptably high bids in early March. The current bid is the result of our re- design of the building to bring the project within budget. The budget is not to exceed $650,000, including all fees, architectural costs; site work and provision for a contingency fund. TRP /ras Attachment (1) • EDINA FIREIRESCUE STATION NO.2 (REBID) EDINA, MINNESOTA CONTRACTOR BASE BID BID BOND Const, Days AAezz t3tz Flrng Emer Gen Cone. Drvs Eng. Fill Lckrs. Cone. Curb Wndw Grg. Door Cbe Yrds Al A2 James Steele Construction 586,700 ✓ 180 3500 4300 12200 5300 -0- 3900 11700 -0- --0- 5.00 ✓ TCM Construction 638,551 ✓ 190 1616 ° 3680 11308 10600 3000 3580 4176 23000 500 4.55 ✓ ✓ Rochon Corporation 645,000 ✓ 135 700 3600 11000 5800 4000 1 3900 8000 4800 •500 11.50 ✓ ✓ Merrimac Construction 664,534 ✓ 200 418 3600 11300 5000 -0- 4149 9000 7700 -0- 20.00 ✓ ✓ C.M. Construction 672,417 ✓ 280 1455 3705 11150 3077 3000 3458 9500 - 100 500 8.00 ✓ ✓ G.E.H. Construction 676,000 ✓ 180 1000 3680 14000 10000 16900 3500 12000 25000 750 None ✓ ✓ Parkos Construction 689,400 ✓ 180 800 3800 11500 3100 4600 4000 9800 -0- 250 9.00 ✓ ✓ Thor Construction 712,000 ✓ 150 -0- 4000 12000 8000 2000 4000 10000 23000 500 13.20 ✓ ✓ Mikkelsun -Wulff 719,500 ✓ 240 1000 6300 11000 5500 1500 4400 9500 3000 500 6.50 ✓ ✓ K.M. Building 725,400 ✓ 119 1786 6365 12000 5328 7521 4112 10124 5091 532 6.50 ✓ ✓ TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: Mav 16, 1996 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Prepare and paint water slide tower at the Edina Aquatic Center Company 1. Hagen Decorators, Inc. 2. Keller Fence Company (no sand blasting or soda) 3. Miracle Recreation RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hagen Decorators, Inc. $8,595.00 Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $8,595.00 2. $8,550.00 3. $9,720.00 Budget Acct No: 0026 -1315 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for preparing and painting the waterslide tower at the Edina Aquatic Center. Preparation will include soda blasting and removing rust and residue with hand power tools. A coat of primer paint and two coasts of urethane paint will then be applied. The work is guaranteed for three years, however, the finished product is expected to have a life expectancy between 10 and 15 years depending upon environmental conditions and use. Staff is recommending Hagen Decorators bid, which is $45.00 more than Keller Fence's bid, simply because Keller Fence submitted a bid to only paint and not sand or soda blast rusted areas prior to painting. & 10 Sig The Recommended B tyre is within budget not within bvtI1get /J9nn Kenneth Rodland, City Ili#, Finance Director r TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 20 May, 1996 AGtNUA I I tM W.G. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Milling of Asphalt Streets (Partial) Company 1. Midwest Asphalt 2. Midstate Reclamation 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Midwest Asphalt GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 7,395.00 2. $10,934.19 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ $ 7,395.00 This is part of our street renovation program where we have a contractor mill small areas for repair by our asphalt paving crew. This purchase is funded by the Public Works general operating budget. Public Works - Streets Signat a Depa ent The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J n Walli Finance Director Kenneth Ro land, �Qit0ma ager A1f o e 0 TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 A ^r \Llr%A IT=RR w n )ATE: Zu May, i vvu �• ITEM DESCRIPTION: Aquatic Weed Treatment - 18 Locations Comlany Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Lake Restoration, Inc. 1. $ 10,793.00 2. Lake Management, Inc. .2. $ 19,846.45 3. Midwest Aqua Care 3. $ 21,900.00 4. 4. $ 5. 5. $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Lake Restoration, Inc. $ 10,793.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is part of the water quality program for the City's. ponds and lakes. This quote provides for only aquatic weed treatment to retard growth on eighteen known locations a minimum of twice this season. This may also control some algae bloom. This program is funded by the stormwater utility (see attached memorandum). Public Works - Utilities Signatur Depa nt The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J n Wallin, Finance Director I/ , e� ' e7� Z -J, Kenneth osland, City Manager WATER QUALITY INFORMATION During 1995, City Council discussed how the current program is done regarding the City's lakes and ponds. There are currently several specific programs ongoing which have been developed over the years by the City and /or residents on certain water bodies. The current programs are: A. Millpond in the Country Club Area B. Indianhead Lake C. Arrowhead Lake D. Point of France Pond (privately managed by Lake Management) E. Cornelia Swimming Pool Pond (City Property) F. Centennial Lakes (City Property) The above six areas have a variety of programs such as: A. Chemical Treatment B. Aeration C. Weed Cutting These programs are used as a total package to provide control and to provide oxygen for fish population in the winter months. The City participates in the Millpond, Indianhead, and Arrowhead thru specially assessing the projects and providing some staff time towards the programs or a partial funding of the programs. Currently, there is interest in establishing programs on Melody Lake and Mirror Lake. Staff has been advising residents on the general water quality control techniques. Staff has spent considerable time discussing the issues with representatives of Midwest Aqua Care, Lake Restoration, Inc., and Lake Management, Inc. Staff spent the time trying to develop a new concept on how the City might change its current program. The discussion ranged from the City setting up a general maintenance assessment program to specially assess all work, or to have all the lake and pond areas be left to the residents to organize and treat 'as they see the needs occur with the City participating on a per acre cost, as an example. Two of the three private sector contractors think a seasonal approach is the best way to handle treatment because treatment needs are very unpredictable. At this point, staff would recommend that the 1996 program not be changed but that we use the Melody Lake and Mirror Lake groups to develop a new prototype for future use. Most residents are initially surprised by the costs involved but most seem determined that some type of program should exist with both private and public funding. REPORURECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CRAIG G. SWANSON TRAFFIC SAFETY DATE: MAY 20, 1996 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Recommendation: Motion to adopt the report. Info /Background: None. Agenda Item # V.A.' Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ElTo Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW .MAY 7. 1996 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 7, 1996: Staff present included the City Engineer, the Police Chief, Assistant City Manager, the Traffic Safety Coordinator, and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 20, 1996, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. (1) Request to restrict parking on southbound France Avenue South, south of W. 54th Street. Requestor states that on- street Tires Plus overflow parking creates a bottleneck during evening rush hour. The staff reviewed the request.. Observations confirmed the reasons the requestor cited. One (1) reportable accident occurred during the last three (3) years involving parked cars as described. The staff concluded and recommends that "No Parking 4:00 - 6:00 PM" signs be installed on southbound France Avenue southward for 100 feet to facilitate the merging of traffic. (2) Request to re- designate lane markings on southbound Metro Boulevard at Industrial Boulevard. New markings would include a "straight ahead" arrow permitting entry to a commercial area. Current signs and markings for southbound Metro Boulevard traffic technically prohibit "straight ahead" traffic. Regulatory arrows permit only a right or left turn. The staff recommends a "straight ahead arrow be included and aligned with the driveway to permit entry to the commercial area. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW May 7, 1996 Page 2 (1) Request to remove "Stop" sign located on W. 51st Street at Bedford Avenue. Westbound W. 51 st Street traffic is stopped at Bedford Avenue. The other three (3) legs of the intersection are uncontrolled. This Stop sign would not meet current warrants. Records of its installation do not exist but it is reported that years ago a clearview problem may have caused its installation. The staff discussion centered on the liability of removing the sign. The area predominantly serves local traffic. Given the habits of these drivers and the expectation they would have of W. 51 st Street traffic stopping, they would likely not yield right of way to that opposing traffic. It is thought the City would incur certain liabilities by removing the sign. To mitigate this, other signage might be required to notify drivers of the change. No standard signage of that nature i s available. The staff recommends denial of the request. (2) Request to highlight the "Stop" signs on Concord Avenue at W. 59th Street. The request was prompted by a reported "near miss" of a child in the crosswalk by a vehicle not stopping at the posted sign. The staff reviewed the area and found it in compliance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Police Department is giving special attention to enforcement of the Stop sign. Also, the sign is two sizes larger than minimum requirements. The staff recommends. denial of the request. (3) Request to highlight the crosswalk on Dewey Hill Road at Delaney Boulevard. The staff will check the standards for crosswalks and repaint the markings this spring. The staff recommends denial of the request for signage beyond the standard. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: POLICE CHIEF WILLIAM BERNHJELM DATE: ; MAY 17, 1996 SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY PRELIMINARY DESIGN 800 MHz TRUNKED RADIO PROJECT Agenda Item # V. C) Consent Information Only ED As part of the design of the Hennepin County portion of the Metropolitan 800 MHz trunked radio system, it is necessary for the City to enter into a cooperative agreement with the County for consulting engineer services. These services are site evaluation and engineering of microwave paths which will connect the City's dispatch center to the rest of the system. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this agreement. The cost to the City of this study is $3,800. Participation in this study does not constitute a final commitment by the City to participation in the 800 MHz system. It is expected that later in the summer, after additional cost information will be available, a final commitment will be needed on our participation in this system. Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action , Motion EliResolution Ordinance Discussion As part of the design of the Hennepin County portion of the Metropolitan 800 MHz trunked radio system, it is necessary for the City to enter into a cooperative agreement with the County for consulting engineer services. These services are site evaluation and engineering of microwave paths which will connect the City's dispatch center to the rest of the system. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this agreement. The cost to the City of this study is $3,800. Participation in this study does not constitute a final commitment by the City to participation in the 800 MHz system. It is expected that later in the summer, after additional cost information will be available, a final commitment will be needed on our participation in this system. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # v_D FROM: Francis Hoffmart,7 El Consent City Engineer ,�` Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: .20 May, 1996 x❑ To Council SUBJECT: Cooperative Construction Action ❑ Motion Agreement with Mn /DOT for Local Cost Participation in ® Resolution the Integrated Corridor Traffic Management System (ICTM) ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize resolution for Mayor and Manager to sign cooperative construction agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation for integrated corridor traffic management system components. Info /Background: As part of the ongoing 1 -494 Corridor Project, (airport to 1 -394), the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County, Bloomington, Richfield and Edina have been working on developing and installing an integrated corridor traffic management system from 34th Avenue to East Bush Lake Road along the corridor. This current project is in the third year of a four year project. The main project (approximately seven million dollars) links control systems together so that sub - regional integrated management of the I 494 corridor can occur. The system portion in Edina links the traffic control systems along W. 76th Street, W. 77th Street and Edina Industrial Boulevard to a sub - regional control system. This system ties in ramp meters, ramp interchange signals, County signals and City signals plus provides some closed circuit television to monitor traffic flow in these streets. The Edina portion of the project is estimated at $67,615.56 for the work that needs to be done on our system to integrate the system. These costs are eligible for state aid funding. In fact, staff has required in the cooperative agreement that the City would expend funds onl if the items are state aid eligible. This project can be extended further west along the corridor as the Minnesota Department of Transportation expands and rehabilitates the existing system. The technology being used on this project allows for the system to "sense" the traffic in the corridor by use of pavement detectors and adjust timing of the controllers to allow for maximum use of the system. As such, staff would recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor and Manager to sign the cooperative construction agreement. �1 rill�llllll011 111 /111'i111�� 111111 111 ■11!111l� � 11111 111� �I11���111111�1 1 LA 53 55 ■ ■ 62 i �1 o e h 0 CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Agreement No. 74863 with the. State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the integrated corridor traffic management system components construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 494 from east Bush Lake Road to the east corporate City limits under State Projects No. 2785 -300 (T.H.. 494 =393) and No. 120 - 030 -01. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement. Eli =11:i11111;1Lf -`%11 IC ZI State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Edina at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 20th day of May, 1996, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Debra Mangen, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES DATE: MAY 20, 1996 SUBJECT: LAND SALE - YORK LIQUOR STORE Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.E. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize land exchange agreement and related documents with respect to the relocation of the York Avenue liquor store based upon the attached terms. Info /Background: Staff has negotiated the attached terms concerning the relocation of the York Avenue liquor store. We recommend that the City Council authorize the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents to affect the relocation. April 19, 1996 RELOCATION OF YORK AVENUE LIQUOR STORE Jerry's Enterprises is proposing a redevelopment of property located on the east side of York Avenue South between Wicke's Furniture and Key Cadillac. Proposed area to be redeveloped includes the City's York Avenue liquor store. The City's clear preference is to relocate liquor store to space presently occupied by Hirshfield's, however, Hirshfield's lease runs to November 30, 2002 and to date it has not agreed to relocate. In order to allow redevelopment to proceed City proposes to relocate liquor store on following terms: 1. Construction of New Liquor Store in Exchange for Existing Store. Jerry's Enterprises agrees to construct new liquor store to replace City's existing York Avenue liquor store. • store to be approximately 8,000 square feet. • store and adjacent parking are to be owned by City and located on west end of new CUB Foods store with cross easements for ingress and egress and parking. • plans for new store to be approved by City with store to have different brick look or treatment so that store is distinguishable from CUB Foods store. • all planning, construction, moving, legal and other costs associated with new store and transfer of existing store to be paid by Jerry's Enterprises, including costs related to acquisition and installation of store fixtures, signage and all other items to the satisfaction of City. City and Jerry's Enterprises to agree on existing fixtures and systems to be relocated to new store. move to new store to be made with no or minimal loss of hours of operation at York Avenue store. upon completion of move City will transfer existing York Avenue store to Jerry's Enterprises on an "as is" basis. Jerry's Enterprises to conduct own due diligence as to any environmental matters. 2. City Option to Relocate Store to Present Hirshfield Location. City to have option to relocate York Avenue liquor store to existing Hirshfield's site at expiration of lease (lease expires November 30, 2002). Relocation and any necessary remodeling of space to be at no cost to City and City will own space with adjacent parking. To extent feasible existing fixtures and systems to be relocated on same terms as under No. 1 above. Terms of relocation to be on similar basis as under No. 1 above, and upon completion of move City will transfer liquor store adjacent to CUB Foods store to Jerry's Enterprises. 3. Financial Guaranties by Jerry's Enterprises. If gross sales at York Avenue liquor store in any calendar year are less than an amount determined by increasing gross sales at store for 1995 by 3% annually, Jerry's Enterprises will pay to the City 10% of the amount by which gross sales for year are less than projected amount. For example if gross sales for York Avenue liquor store in 1995 was $1 million projected gross sales for 1997 will be $1,060,900. If gross sales for store in 1997 are $1,025,000, Jerry's Enterprises required to pay City $3,590 (i.e. 10% of difference between $1,060,900 and $1,025,000). Agreement covers the period until the City moves into Hirshfield's space if relocation option described in No. 2 above is exercised or until December 31, 20.02 if relocation option is not exercised. 4. Notice to Hirshfield's. Before parties proceed to document this proposal, Jerry's Enterprises to inform Hirshfields of the proposal. -2- REPORT /RECOMMENDATION •,v v TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.F. FROM: Francis Hoffman `� 4 El Consent �; City Engineer , � � Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 May, 1996 Q To Council SUBJECT: Storm Sewer Action ❑ Motion Improvement No. STS -240 Rolling Green Area 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Improvement Project STS -240, plans and specifications and advertise for bids. Info /Background: This proposed project is to replace an existing system which is deteriorating (old metal pipe) and upgrading the size to meet current standards. This project is in the Rolling Green area and would connect to the recently completed Meadowbrook Golf Course stormwater project. The attached map depicts the routing of the piping. This project would reduce potential flooding around the homes on the Rolling Green pond. The estimated cost for this project is $440,151.16. Due to the narrowness of the road from the Mait Lane / Merilane intersection into the Merilane cul -de -sac, the street will have to be replaced after completion of the storm sewer. This accounts for approximately twenty -five percent of the construction cost. Staff believes this construction is in keeping with our stormwater management goals to lower flood potential and replacing aging infrastructure. The project will be funded from the storm water utility fund. Staff recommends authorization of this project. I I I MEADOWBROO R 0 I GOLF _ �QI CCU SE oe— PROPOSED STO M SEWER EXISTING STOR SEWER I NTERLACHEN COUNTRY i7 -r; �1 r, \ NEW PONDS s -- C r� 1' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.G. FROM: Francis Hoffman,.' �� ❑ Consent City Engineer I Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 May, 1996 x❑ To Council SUBJECT: Storm Sewer Lift Station Action ❑ Motion Improvement No. STS -242 � Resolution ❑ . Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Improvement Project STS -242, plans and specifications and advertise for bid. Info /Background: Mirror Lakes has been experiencing consistently high water in the past three years. City staff had the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) review the lake and establish a normal high water line. The attached graph depicts the DNR set high water point outlined in red, 907.5 feet above sea level. Mirror Lakes has been monitored by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District since 1963. Prior to the 1987 Federal Flood Disaster rainfall event, only one time in June of 1965, did Mirror Lake exceed the normal high water mark. In 1987, the flood caused the lake to rise 4.6 feet above the normal high water mark. However, an extremely dry period followed the flood and the lake receded to 904.5 feet above sea level by January of 1989. The City experienced two rainfall events in July of 1992 and then July of 1993 which caused the lake to again exceed the normal high water mark. The past three years has had weather conditions not conducive to a great amount of evaporation which is currently the only way the lake level drops other than absorption. Homeowners on the lake have expressed concern over the high water and loss of mature oak trees at the lake shore. Staff has developed a plan which DNR staff has reviewed. A lift station could be installed on City owned property just east of Fox Meadow Lane. A line could be installed from that point then over to Pine Grove Road to a gravity storm sewer. Attached is the location map and neighbors' letters concerning this issue. The estimated cost to construct the lift station and force main is $163,292.00 which includes NSP costs to provide power to the station. The project would allow the City to control the lake at an elevation of 906.00 which is one and one -half feet lower than the normal high water elevation. This project would be funded from the stormwater utility fund. OEM MMMM mmm BLAKE POAD I I I I I I I I I I " OHIKDOO DR/y 1 - -T- £� I- --- - -� -�_ / r - i ___Jr�\\ � I I I , L-- - - -7'' i I � I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �/ May 11, 1996 To: Fran Hoffman From: David A. and Janet M. Nelson 5105 Lake Ridge Road Edina, MN 55436 Re: Proposed Lift Station for Mirror Lake Thank you for the information you have provided us with concerning the proposed lift station for Mirror Lake. We appreciate your dedicated efforts in tracing the need for such a station. This is a reasonable and timely solution. As residents who live on Mirror Lake, we feel this is a necessity due to the high water and the trees that are dying because of the high water. We have three large oak trees on our property that are in extreme danger. Many other residents on the lake are experiencing similar circumstances. Since there is no outlet to this lake and now with the additional development of the Boos' property, we feel that in the future there will be even more water to deal with - -and more dead trees. This will eventually affect the asthetic value of this lake and the surrounding properties. cc: Fred Richards 5101 LAKE RIDGE ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 MARY LACK, CPA (612) 938 -5275 May 16, 1996 Mr. Fran Hoffman Edina City Engineer Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Via Facsimile 927 -7645 Dear Mr. Hoffman, I am concerned about the high water level of Mirror Lake. I am aware of your proposed project to install a lift station which will enable city engineers to lower the water level and to subsequently control it. I support the project and hope that it can be completed quickly. Sincerely, ,G Mary ach ZO -d 4�vl W VSt =ti 96- 91- 'CEW May 15, 1996 To: Mayor Fred Richards From: Chuck and Judy Colby Re: Proposed Lift Station for Mirror Lake As per our phone conversation, this is a follow -up letter concerning the proposed lift station for Mirror Lake to be voted on at the March 20th meeting of the Edina City Council. Chuck and I live on Mirror Lake and are very concerned about the high water level of the lake as are other residents of the lake and the loosing of a lot of very old trees due to the high water level. At the present, there is no outlet for the lake with the street storm sewers draining into the lake at' our end. With the development of the Boos property, we feel there will be additional drainage into the lake from the front part of the property. A lift station to maintain the water level would far out weigh the cost of the removal of the trees that could be lost. The loss of many trees could eventually affect the aesthetic value of this lake and the surrounding properties. We would appreciate a vote for putting in a lift station. Thank you, Chuck and Judy Colby cc: Fran Hoffman w9tN�1r o� e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION �yc o• ,��RPoftfM�� BBB TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.H. FROM: Francis Hoffman �j� ❑ Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: 20 May, 1996 X❑ To Council SUBJECT: Centennial Lakes Action ❑ Motion Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -243 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Improvement Project STS -243, plans and specifications approval and advertise for bid. Info /Background: Development on the southerly third of Centennial Lakes will cause the need to install the final portion of public storm sewer. The attached drawing with the proposed pipe shown in red is the location for public improvement. This pipe would ultimately serve as the outlet for the current lake and lake to be constructed on the southerly area. This project is required now as it will go through a portion of the new development. Also, it meets the requirements of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District as part of the overall City plan. This project will replace the existing ditch and piping that go through the new development. The estimated cost of this project is $288,940.00. This project would be funded through the HRA as a Park improvement. The staff would recommend approval of the project. r n WA Y $ 0 tl T p II u m tlee� a alas O IL mm Df a am= yy . ws ®r ro-s• �w ipt pd 9 MID G Q�nL MNJ eE'Tlfilld OOrm u N .. \ n� R F'd111i1 tyglty tl \ O � ca e � €ig■ is W m I UNSUITABLE SOIL Ll m STOCKPIPE AREA CCCC BORROW KT.AREA m SIDE SLOPES y A O g t MAXIMUM OF 3:1 BORR W m 834 MINIM �.... - _.. .,. ._. - f � "P.., SILT FENCE O _7 o P O \ a SILT FENCE \ \ V ?\ ,:UNE OF- PARKIN �' \ •�- '•'.:'.... RAMP.. ABOVE l / \ I 1�%i. O SALVAGE EXIST. 32lf •.\ •`-- W OF SIB' CMP .. .\ Z PIPE ! APRON \ _ SALVAGE EXIST. UL AT • FD �` ••.'.`�•',o , OF 36' EQ. • RCP ARCH PIPE PROVIDE BULKHEAD AT EXISTING '� PROPERTY LINE �+e I IE 27.39 EXIST. ST SEWER SYSTEM TO REMAIN _ o \ ' O / 111 ' /� ti /// .. ... .. ... __ - ♦�+ m.. - .. -. I FUTURE CONNECTION TO g IST. STORM SEWER SYSTEM _ - O NOTE- 3 Z Y RUNOFF - _ STORM SEWER RUNOFF FROM ME OPOS[D FUTURE STORM SEWER p UPPER LEVEL PARKING RAMP TO B ROUTED CONNECTION TO EXIST. 4 CE A VENUE t SOUTH DIRECTLY TO THE CITY STORM SE SYSTEM. . Ss' RCP ON THE WEST n SIDE OF FRANCE AVE. m C� I b I J REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES Agenda Item Consent # V.I. Information Only ❑ DATE: MAY 20, 1996 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: X❑ To Council LEASE - AMERICAN I PORTABLE TELECOM Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize execution of lease /site agreement to permit the installation of a cellular telephone tower and antenna on City property in the vicinity of Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway. Report: Staff has been approached by representatives of American Portable Telecom concerning the installation of a PCS telephone antenna in the vicinity of Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway. PCS (Personal Communication Service) is the newest generation of cellular telephones which operates on a different frequency than existing cellular service. APT is proposing a site agreement/lease which would permit the installation of a 75 foot tall monopole and cellular antenna array. This installation would be located just east of the Gleason Avenue water tower as shown on the attached air photo. The attached plans illustrate the proposed monopole and cellular antenna. This installation will be almost identical to that installed by USWest Communications at the Fire Station at Tracy and the Crosstown: APT has submitted a proposed site agreement for the City's consideration. Under the terms of the site agreement, APT would lease the property for an REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - LEASE /AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECOM May 20,1996 Page two initial term of six years and would retain an option to extend the lease for three additional six year terms. The proposed rental fee is $1,000 per month for the initial term. This rental rate would increase for subsequent terms at a rate equal to three percent per year. Although the lease has not been reviewed in detail by the City Attorney, the staff finds it to be very similar to the lease entered into with USWest Communications two years ago. The Park Director, Planning Director, and I have reviewed the proposal and recommend its acceptance subject to the review and approval of the site agreement by the City Attorney. If l �A f'_ �i S.Fi °++" `i. re 'X!� :d��'� 1 Y. i�°,i -.• r Vii... i'y�.(!" - ,s t,j„ ,° r _.�11' it ,.,� r,%N♦� �xi'• 7 � c -1. + t � r�"�, : "- • j ? � r SU. :�c � -.',� �:: 1 •: .. �2 _ l' :`' 1. • l if}` _ ..F !45_�Oi kz, _ ��x*,�� ,fix �+ w,� ~� ` 'r a y• �" �� "._tom �� �� ,Yr '. ;, A•" �' � � r ",� 1 Y i f � ��% �� L`y �jtw i- r yr' =�'.• � 'nom " ,� �= y i ml. 1 ! y a vi PRA ANTENNA ARRAY PROPOSED 75• MONOP01 PROPOSED 6' CHAIN LINK EXISTING SMALL TREES AND BRUSH (TYP.) 910' ELEVATION N(y\ MAGNETIC NORTH IS 3• EAST 9� � AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS IEDINA -CREEK (WATER TANK -62 & ELEVATION TOM OU!!EK ONAlTCk V p0: KK DATE: ] 7l 96 SNCR: COORDINATES or• ■ E: K N ■ A SOUTH ELEVATION caOUP Qt�aeoRAtm as 53' 19" N 93' 23' 01.5" W q SEE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS FOR SCOPE OF WORK Io*o OIOWN Pomm PARKWAYsuEEB Sao AMSL = 910 FT. t5' Afl-W Oaar� 30338 (T/0) 4813100 PAX CM 41.2130 C iOPOSED COMPOUND AREA 30'x3O' FENCED AREA 10'x16' EQUIPMENT PAD 75' MONOPOLE tOPOSED 12' ACCESS ROAD ITH 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT rA ATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PLOT PLAN - TEA 18� N A PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/I OF THE OF SECTION 01.5' W 6. TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH. RANGE 21 WEST. EDINA, SEE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS FOR SCOPE OF WORK 1040 CROWN PODFTB PARKWAY�SUrta EOo 910 FT. t5' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. wdan 6 ORLnmR 30778 (FM) 4813100 FAX mo) 4813170 N(y\ MAGNETIC NORTH IS 3' EAST D SO I= Iw 200 OuPwt SGLLE SCALL: V • 100• THESE DRAWINGS ARE PROPRIETARY IN MATURE AND RE- THE PROPERTY OP T4 THEY ARE PROOUCED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLINT AND MAY NOT RE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR LOANED OUT NITHOUT PRIOR "MEN PERMISSION FROM TEA. THEY DRAMIN0 ARE PUBLISHED AS A CON - "ETICE FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSISnNO OUR CLIENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF THEIR C M- STRICTION IN AN OROAN 0 -0 nM[LY AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS EDINA -CREEK VALLEY ELEMENTARY PLOT PLAN REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # V.K. FROM: RON WASMUND Consent ❑ BUILDING OFFICIAL Information Only ❑ DATE: MAY 20, 1996 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA SUBJECT: 0 To Council TELECOMMUNICATION FOCUS GROUP Action 0 Motion APPOINTMENT ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to select participants for a telecommunications focus' group. Info/Background: The Technology Committee has been assigned the task of developing a Technology Plan for the upgrade of communication and computer technology within the city's operations. The Technology Committee has divided into small work groups with specific areas of focus. One of those work groups is the Telecommunication Work Group. The mission of the Telecommunication Work Group is to make a recommendation to the Technology Committee and ultimately the City Council for the design of a telephone system and other telecommunication devices that will enhance service to the public. Input from the community on the types of systems they would desire to use and benefit from would be helpful in our design. What kind of communication do they want with "City Hall ". We are suggesting that a focus group of five citizens be selected from groups that interact frequently with the city on business transactions. We are suggesting they be selected from groups such as, but not limited to, Athletic REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Telecommunication Focus Group Appointmen MAY 20, 1996 Page two Associations, Builders Association, Building Owners/Managers Association, Real Estate industry, Senior Center, and the volunteer list for an at large member. We would plan to meet with the focus group for two meetings. We would like to have our first meeting with them on June 6th and the second meeting on June 15th. We would incorporate their recommendations into our plan formulation. I2. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: CITY .COUNCIL Agenda Item # VI.E. FROM: DEBRA MANGEN Consent ❑ CITY CLERK ❑ Information Only DATE: MAY 20, 1996 ❑ Mgr. Recommends To H RA SUBJECT: X❑ To Council PETITION FOR STREET LIGHTING - ALLEYS AT Action ❑ Motion MADISON & JEFFERSON ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: To refer the petition for alley lighting at Madison and Jefferson to the Engineering Department for processing. Info /Background: The attached petition requesting street lighting in the alley at Madison and Jefferson was received from the residents of Madison and Jefferson Avenues. Our normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. I f7; jv6x� 6 911\ 1 The City Council City of Edina Petition AA- ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING D WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER,/ ❑ S7W LIGHTI G ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: ' SURFACING WITH CURB ANTI (VTPi'i`F.R To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between G ? �'s�,ae�� and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and 'CATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) ,0- �' j-& a 3 a, rn O'Lat'-, (Lr S6 14l1 ,r %= rz- /V; /Air^, OWNER'S PHONE C/ 35- 7.3 C -1 3 '1 This petition s circulated by: n - wwr � !�- �► 3 v -rn G -cQc Q.vv� o e 3 ,5 - 6 ? ( NAME V ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1880 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) A "V)6 illlC ld tj qer G r ew e PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S.- PHONE ,319 T,,Wersc,, Le S 93 3517 Avg L --I LZA-1 -cl-, 1-7 AGENDA ITEM: VII.A. Edina City Council, Edina City Hall Edina, MN 55436 . 5109 Ridge Road, Edina, MN 55436 May 15, 1996 Dear City Council Members: As resident of 5109 Ridge Road, we wish to inform the Council of a serious and growing problem in our neighborhood. In the past few years, we have noticed an alarming increase in the vegetation damage caused by deer herd's feeding behavior. Our hostas, lilies, fern, blue bells, roses never came to bloom as the deer feed on the buds and tender shoots all spring and early summer. We have tried all the "tricks" in the book including building a fence around the garden to no avail. Last fall, we spoke with Mr. Hughes at City Hall, who told us that in conjunction with Eden Prairie and Minnetonka, the deer herd would be reduced. However, this spring, fourteen of our foundation plants- Princess Spirea in front of our house were mulled to stubs in May. (Please see the attached photos.) With the Council approved development of a large previously wild area next to Van Volkenberg Park and another area along Schafer Road, the natural habitat that supported the deer herd in northwest Edina is gone. It is only a matter of time before someone is hurt while trying to avoid the deer that cross. Ridge Road at night. Our backyard is no longer safe for children to roam due to Lyme disease concern as the deer herd has practically camped out nightly on our land. We are neither "anti- development° or "anti- wildlife ". However, the Council that grants permits for human development must accept the reality that Edina can no longer keep the "illusion" of pastoral tranquillity with deer roaming in the wild. It is the Council's responsibility to stop the damage that deer cause to existing properties and to prevent serious disease and or injury to humans from these displaced creatures. The deer controlled program is doomed to failure, since there will only be rapidly diminishing deer habitat in our area. Turning the few remaining backyards into feeding and camping ground for deer herd is not an acceptable solution. We urge the Council to take action on this serious problem. Joseph M. Terry � ' KaiMay Y. Terry � : � � � - t,Ff"" � x n}g' '` •' ?tip K ��, �' ' ' �• .. M;k ?C - - x- _ 7-• :` .y ,' . �'- ,•,cta , . ��cy.��cr" -x 2;' �`i" Y r it - ,-y :y . 4 . ► . `/ ^,S,! ,., ,� .;� � , �'f • �, �'' .�� rte. y- � %, � � \f. x,� ��'' •�`'��'��14' yam' I} un �� iii(. - 5•`1Y. � �Yrr!r A.,�'hi +J'/.'� -.. iy i�u L cal � np.� -'� it .� 72 . _ "� Ilk c ♦� .T I171 ��.'..1 �_ i F� ��' 7)�J..w _s..v �•:.� r.. f�.� �w,z 4, 4Ffi•�`T` --its' � • i � _ i :. 1 � . � � r �, 3. L ^ 'fir c-[ • 4. r� i G� y� .:�" �•-� ' + .'may -�..�� r :' \��. y. � ,'� `�k •� [� ` � �.� ti� �� ���� ; � cam.. ` F-� 1 +r � S ,�� �� fJ.>t��Rf a L 1 .• ` . r> �,' � i .' � yi, �. .4 f a ..i4Ja' tom,, � � i .J .h,4- .- j?", ^1 � - E. �.. _ _'?'r`'k�'. ''�., -� _ ::•.� — _ . pr-'- flyi i •. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM Page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------ INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM _ _ 165753 ------------------------- 05/20/96 $7,227.28 AAA LICENSES & PERMITS 043096 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $7,227.28* 165754 05/20/96 $36.00 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER CARDBOARD 5961424 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $36.00* 165755 05/20/96 .$68.16 ACT ELECTRONICS INC REPAIR TRAFFIC COUNTE 4150 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7063 < *> $68.16* 165756 05/20/96 $75.00 ACTION MAILING SERVICE MAILING SERVICE 50156 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 165757 05/20/96 $127.70 ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM LASER CERTS 004314 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI 7766 < *> $127.70* 165758 05/20/96 $3.70 ALBINSON COPIES OF BLUEPRINTS 506212 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $3.70* 165759 05/20/96 $65.48 ALL FIRE TEST INC MAINT 10538 10643 GRILL NORMANDALE GC SVC CONTR EQUI GENERAL SUPPLI 7764 7764 05/20/96 05/20/96 $104.00 $232.79 ALL FIRE TEST INC ALL FIRE TEST INC SUPPLIES EXT FIRE EXTING 10643 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 7764 < *> $402.27* 165760 05/20/96 $111.42 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 33636 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 7972 05/20/96 $1,325.31. ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 33664 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING < *> $1,436.73* 165761 05/20/96 $234.30 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER /ALTERNATOR 25670 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6131 05/20/96 $169.34 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 25351 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6199 05/20/96 $148.04 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 25302 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6393 < *> $551.68* 165762 05/20/96 $97.00 AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD, T ADVERTISING 2889 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER < *> $97.00* 165763 05/20/96 $60.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $69.74 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $13.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $69.73 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $107.62 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $243.49 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $38.13 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 043096/G GRILL LAUNDRY < *> $602.73* 165764 05/20/96 $25.51 ANDERSON, MOLLY MEETING EXP /POLICE 050996 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS < *> $25.51* 165765 05/20/96 $61.45 ANDERSON, TODD COST OF GOODS - PRO S 050896 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $237.47 ANDERSON, TODD GENERAL SUPPLIES 050896 PRO SHOP < *> $298.92* 165766 05/20/96 $15.15 ANDY'S PORTABLES PORTABLE TOILETS 7080 MAINT OF COORS SVC CONTR EQUI 6194 05/20/96 $58.65 ANDY'S PORTABLES SERVICE SANITATION 7147 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQUI 8194 < *> $73.80* COUNCIL CHECK .,6GISTER WED, MAY .15, CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------- 165767 05/20/96 $205.65 <*> $205.65* 165768 05/20/96 $495.00 <*> $495.00* 165769 05/20/96 $327.27 *� $327.27* 165770 05/20/96 $759.20 05/20/96 $49.04 *�- $808.24* 1996, 7:40 PM VENDOR ANTIGUA GROUP INC, THE APWA AQUA ENGINEERING ASHWORTH INC ASHWORTH INC DESCRIPTION GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCE SPRINKLER PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS - PRO I NVOICE- 578894 051096 18162 S 138899 S 141675 PROGRAM - GOLF ADMINISTR ENGINEERING GE SNOW & ICE REM PRO SHOP PRO SHOP - - -- OBJECT - -- GENERAL SUPPLI CONF & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR page 2 NUM -- 6608 7710 4178 4178 165771 <*> 05/20/96 $224.44 $224.44* ASIAN PAGES EMPLOYMENT ADS 12933 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT-PERSONL 165772 <*> 165773 <*> 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 $170.20 $170.20* $48.27 $105.79 $154.06* ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP COCOA MATS SEATS BRACKET 81932 T37516 T37938 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 6838 7433 165774 <*> 05/20/96 05/20/96 $15.13 $17.05 $32.18* AT & T AT & T TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041896 042796 ED BUILDING & CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 165775 <*> 165776 <*> 05120196 05/20/96 $7.93 $7.93* $185.34 $185.34* AT &T AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS SOLD 042496 043096 CENT SVC GENER NORMANDALE GC TELEPHONE COST OF GD SOL 5630 165777 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 $143.02 $1,047.99 $75.43 $68.52 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES O43096/G O43096/P O43096/P O43096/P MAINT OF COURS EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $1,334.96* 165778 <*> 05/20/96 $72.10 $72.10* AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 35028 ARENA RLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 7499 165779 05/20/96 05/20/96 .$25.00 $35.00 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA CHECK FRONT END SET TOE 2194 2301 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLI 7551 7796 165780 <*> 05/20/96 560.00* $35.32 $35.32* AXT, LYLE COST OF GOODS SOLD 043096 GUN RANGE COST OF GD SOL 165781 <*> 165782 <*> 05/20/96 05/20/96 $5,796.42 $5,796.42* $207.91 $207.91* B & F DISTRIBUTING INC BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLESA GASOLINE PLANTS 240350 89049001 EQUIPMENT OPER STREET REVOLVI GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLI 7543 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM--- - - - --- - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM 165783 ------------------ 05/20/96 $975.54 -------- --- ------ -- --- ------ BAILEY AUTOMATED SYSTEMS FLOWMETERS 10075 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 6978 c *> $975.54* 165784 05/20/96 $263.06 BAILEY NURSERIES TREES 191005 191006 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR TREES FLWR SHR 7772 7772 05/20/96 $221.52 BAILEY NURSERIES IVY < *> $484.58* 165785 05/20/96 $80.00 BALDINGER, WENDY PERFORM CL 060496 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $80.00* 165786 05/20/96 $100.00 BARNHART, NORM PROGRAM EDINBOROUGH 053096 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 165787 05/20/96 $25.00 BCA /TRAINING & DEVELOPME CONT ED /POLICE T001948 POLICE DEPT. G CONE & SCHOOLS < *> $25.00* 165788 05/20/96 $423.70 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94160 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $108.95 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94165 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $184.48 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 23127 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $97.58 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 231271 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $21.06 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 231272 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 - $21.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS.SOLD BE 94576 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 - $107.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94651 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $92.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 231613 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $799.87* 165789 05/20/96 - $53.00 BEN HOGAN COMPANY COST OF GOODS - 'PRO S 423492 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4141 05/20/96 $419.30. BEN HOGAN COMPANY RENTAL CARTS 426024 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 7342 05/20/96 $38.05 BEN HOGAN COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 427514 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4141 05/20/96 $68.36 BEN HOGAN COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 428012 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4141 < *> $472.71* 165790 05/20/96 $175.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 043096/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $262.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 043096/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 -$4.24 BERGFORD TRUCKING BREAKAGE 043096/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $304.60 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELVERY 043096/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $737.86* 165791 05/20/96 $90.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 051496 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $180.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 051496 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $410.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 051496 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $335.00 BERGLUND, STANLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 051496 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,015.00* 165792 05/20/96 $_16.15 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3532870 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 7716 05/20/96 $51.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3538230 SENIOR CITIZEN FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI OFFICE SUPPLIE 7827 05/20/96 $189.74 $48.89 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 3540420 3547810 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 7778 05/20/96 05/20/96 -$6.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES CM353071 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $20.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3558610 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7827 05/20/96 $296.33 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 3566240 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 8189 05/20/96 - $20.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES CM354042 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI.7827 < *> $595.90* 165793 05/20/96 $55.77 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF CORES FOR PAMELA PARK 031737 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7417 page 4 COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 165793 05/20/96 $266.45 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF LOCK CORES 31661 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96 $28.22 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF GENERAL SU PPLIES 032049 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $133.87 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF REPAIR LOCKERS 032334 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS $484.31* 165794 05/20/96 $5,472.43 BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 043096 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES <*> $5,472.43* 165795 05/20/96 $39,966.57 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING CONTRACT FE 96040070 RECYCLING Recycling Char *� $39,966.57* 165796 05/20/96 - $126.16 BIFFS INC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU B1063153 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQUI 05/20/96 $193.70 BIFFS .INC SANITATION B1069288 MAINT OF COURS SVC CONTR EQUI <*> $67.54* 165797 05/20/.96 $278.82 BITUMINOUS R OADWAYS WINTER MIX 71130 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $278.82* 165798 05/20/96 $100.00 BLOOD,.DAVID POLICE SERVICES MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES *� $100.00* 165799 05/20/96 $49.46 BOLKS, JEFFREY GENERAL SUPPLIES 050996 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $49.46* 61217S EQUIPMENT.REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 165800 05/20/96 $45,745.00 BOYER TRUCKS TRUCK 61218S EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 05/20/96 $45,745.00 BOYER TRUCKS TRUCK <*> $91,490.00* 72840 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 165801 05/20/96 $178.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSULTING 76625 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 05/20/96 $144.51 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSULTING <*> $323.26* 165802 05/20/96 $97.98 BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY SUPPLIES 12867 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $97.98* 165803 05/20/96 $295.27 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 416047 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL 05/20/96 $170.51 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC VAC REPAIR 417341 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPPL <*> $465.78* 165804 05/20/96 $6.00 BROWN, DORALIA ELECTIONS 051496 ELECTION PROF SERVICES < * $6.00* 3.65805 05/20/96 $690.77 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC CLASS 2 53678 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP <*> $690.77• 3.65806 05/20/96 $447.30 BUELL'S INC TRIES 000718 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR <*> $447.30* 165807 05/20/96 $29.00 BURKE, SFIEILA CLASS REFUND 050496 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F c *> $29.00* 165808 05/20/96 $225.00 Bi1RNS, STEVE GIRLS HS HOCKEY SCORE 050996 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER <*> $225.00* 165809 05/20/96 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE POLICE SERVICE MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES NUM -- 7501 7624 8196 7366 5515 5515 8192 7627 8021 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM Page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT -- VENDOR ------ ------------ ----- -- - DESCRIPTION - - - - -- - - -- INVOICE- PROGRAM - - - -- OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------- <*> $100.00* 165810 05/20/96 $70.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY GLASSES #61 3602536 03626691 GENERAL MAINT FIRE DEPT. GEN SAFETY EQUIPME PROTECT CLOTHI 7258 05/20/96 $31.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY EYEWEAR SAFETY EYEWEAR #56 03630653 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 7257 05/20/96 05/20/96 $31.00 $41.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY EYEWEAR #116 03631439 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 7256 7266 05/20/96 $41.00 CABOT SAFETY CORP SAFETY EYEWEAR #40 03632084 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI *> $214.00* 165811 05/20/96 $170.98 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 996644 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 5601 5601 05/20/96 $93.28 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS- PRO S S 974450 984610 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5601 05/20/96 05/20/96 $9.07 $106.24 CALLAWAY GOLF CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 984611 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5601 05/20/96 $672.67 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 984612 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5601 < *> $1,052.24* 165812 05/20/96 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 051396 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $50.00* 165813 05/20/96 $2,828.64 CARLSON TRACT /EQUIP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WG012197 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 6942 *> $2,828.64* 165814 05/20/96 $50.00 CARLSON, KENNETH CONT ED /POLICE 051396 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS *> $50.00* 165815 05/20/96 $651.78 CAROL'S BLINDS & DRAPES. PRO OFFICE @ EXEC 050196 RANGE PROF SERVICES <*> $651.78* 165816 05/20/96 $503.18 CATCO HYD CYL 304262 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7510 <*> $503.18* 165817 05/20/96 $26.37 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL VOLUNTEER RECOG 02182 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 7978 *> $26.37* 165818 05/20/96 $263.61 CHEM CONCEPTS CLEANING SUPPLIES 1072 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 8204 <*> $263.61* 165819 05/20/96 $629.00 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER COST OF GOODS - PRO S141818 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5966 +> $629.00* 165820 05/20/96 $150.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SHAPE -UP REGISTRATION 042996 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL c *> $150.00* 165821 05/20/96 $88.61 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 043096 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $88.61* 165822 05/20/96 $95.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06686918 VERNON SELLING ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $122.20 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD OF GOODS SOLD MI MI 06712987 06746928 50TH VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $137.80 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06781552 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 05/20/96 $102.55 $263.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06805476 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX <*> $721.80* 165823 05/20/96 $76.50 COMELEX CORPORATION REBUILD MOTOR 10020470 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS 7606 *> .. $76.50* COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTER WED, MAY CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ----------------- --------- ------ --- 165824 05/20/96 $31.95 05/20/96 $319.50 <*> $351.45* 165825 05/20/96 $319.60 05/20/96 $473.88 <*> $793.48* 165826 05/20/96 $111.28 <*> $111.28* 15, 1996, 7:40 PM VENDOR - --------------------- ---------- --------- COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS DESCRIPTION - - - - -- REMODELING OFFICE FURNITURE DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE MOUSE RESPIRATOR INVOICE ---- 00008173 8206 808799 808817 12731 PROGRAM ---------- - - - CITY HALL PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. G COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINT - OBJECT - -- --- - -- EQUIP REPLACEM GENERAL SUPPLI DATA PROCESSIN GENERAL SUPPLI SAFETY EQUIPME page 6 PO NUM - -- 8004 7858 7975 7542 165827 <*> 05/20/96 $110.21 $110.21* COPY EQUIPMENT INC. PLOTTER SUPPLIES 0018517 ENGINEERING -GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7976 165828 < *> 05/20/96 $1,386.67 $1,386.67* CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J MEDICAL SERVICES MAY 1996 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 165829 <*> 165830 < *> 165831 <*> 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 $200.00 $200.00* $500.00 $500.00* $280.16 $280.16* CROQUET MARKETING OF AME CROSBIE, SCOTT CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC CONSULTING 050996 GENERAL SUPPLIES 050396 COST OF GOODS - PRO S CC842945 ED ADMINISTRAT PARK ADMIN. PRO SHOP PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLI COST OF GDS -PR 5624 165832 05/20/96 $960.00 CROW- HASSAN NURSERY TREES 1828 PARK MEMORIALS PLANT & TREES 7991 < *> $960.00* 165833 <*> 05/20/96 05/20/96 $183.34 $170.65 $353.99* CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIF CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIF LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES 7765376 7845103 LABORATORY LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 7525 7525 165834 <*> 05/20/96 $468.34 $468.34 *. D.J.'s MUNICIPAL SUPPLY SAFETY ITMES 4557 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7703 165835 <*> 05/20/96 $129.00 $129.00* DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY DAIRY 050196 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5631 165836 <*> 05/20/96 $273.20 $273.20* DAYSTARTER BATTERIES 14209 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7709 . 165837 <*> 05/20/96 $402.20 $402.20* DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY COST OF GOODS.SOLD 043096 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5632 165838 < *> 165839 <*> 165846 <*> 165841 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 $100.00 $100.00* $60.07 $60.07* $115.95. $115.95* $671.36 DEPARTMENT OF PUPLIC SAP DEXTER SHOE COMPANY DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST DON BETZEN GOLF CO MN }IAZ MATERIALS FEE COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS - PRO 050696 S 237604 147245 S 4172 POOL OPERATION PRO SHOP ART SUPPLY GIF PRO SHOP CHEMICALS. COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GD SOL COST OF.GDS -PR 5607 7625 5606 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - --- - - - - -- INVOICE ----------------------------------- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM _ _ 165841 ------------------------------------------- 05/20/96 $316.82 ----------- DON BETZEN GOLF CO ---- -- -- KEY RINGS 4243 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 5606 <*> _ $988.18* 165842 05/20/96 $57.66 DONCAVAGE, JACKIE E APRIL MILEAGE 050296 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE < *> $57.66* 165843 05/20/96 $3,685.03 DPC INDUSTRIES WATER CHEMICALS 01155294 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 7327 < *> $3,685.03* 165844 05/20/96 - $483.66 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 37678 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD LIQU GD WINE 05/20/96 $205.00 EAGLE WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 99516 99518 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 05/20/96 05/20/96 $787.51 $683.23 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99522 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $838.73 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99524 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $732.21 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 02182 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $25.49 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 02183 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $102.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 02184 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $766.75 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 02185 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $770.05 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 02186 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $25.49 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 02187 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $4,453.30* 165845 05/20/96 $167.74 EARL F. ANDERSON FENCING 00148330 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7769 < *� $167.74* 165846 05/20/96 $16.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE BE 043096 043096/V GRILL VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GDS BEE GDS BEE 05/20/96 - $10.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD BE 668896 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $1,482.15 $1,263.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 668897 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $2,682.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 668898 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $140.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 668899 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $43.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 0672410 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX BEE 05/20/96 $1,268.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 0672410 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS 05/20/96 $2,708.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 672409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $4,066.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 672411 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $13,661.20* 165847 $111.83 NTR EQUI 05/20/96 $94.79 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST ELIMINATION 3949575 ED BUILDING & SVC C < *> $206.62* 165848 05/20/96 $54.50 ECONOMIST, THE ECONOMIST SUBSCRIPTIO 042896 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $54.50* 165849 05/20/96 $85.16 ECOWATER FINANCE SERVICE WATER TREATMENT 041696 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $85,.16* 165850 05/20/9 6 $15.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERC CHAMBER LUNCHEON 2672 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENB MEETING EXPENS 05/20/96 $15.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERC CHAMBER LUNCHEON 2673 < *> $30.00* 165851 05/20/96 $168.35 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -1 812 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $168.35* 165852 05/20/96 $35.00 EISOLE, MICHELE REFUND TENNIS 051096 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F page 8 COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM PROGRAM OBJECT PO_NUM VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE ------ CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT --- - - - - -- - -- ------------ � ,> $35.00• . ASS OCIATION IN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 050696 PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS 165853 05/20/96 $250.00 EMPLOYERS <,> $250.00* LCD PROJECTOR 102948 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 7811. 165854 05/20/96 $4,845.75 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC 845.75* HOSE 3258 SEWER CLEANING REPAIR PARTS 770 165855 05/20/96 $1,.256.70 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA COMPA SEWER SEWER RODS 3264 SEWER CLEANING REPAIR PARTS 7320 05/20/96 $430.86 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL < *> $1,687.56* 7609 165856 05/20/96 $132-10 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY SAFE�ALARM CONTROL 318749 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC C NTR EQUI 05/20/96 104.26 < *> $236.36* COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4406975 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5605 5605 165857 05/20/96 $50.20 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 4411958 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 05/20/96 $49.24 FOOT -JOY < *> $99.44* 1740 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 165858 05/20/96 $366.56 FORMS GROUP, THE PRINTING PRINTING 1741 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 7594 05/20/96 $364.94 FORMS GROUP, THE < *> $731.50* COST OF GOODS PRO S 32967 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5609 165859 05/20/96 $476.77 FORRESTER'S < *> $476.77* FORESTRY TOOLS 41800 TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 7749 165860 05/20/96 $45.36 FRESCO < *> $45.36* LAUNDRY 043096 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 165861 05/20/96 $32.84 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 043096/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $163.69 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 043096/P GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $788.64 G & K SERVICES LAIINDRY 043096/P EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $473.01 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 043096/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $127.56 G & K SERVICES 043096/P ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $132.51 $43.04 G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 043096/P O43096/P CITY HALL GENE PW BUILDING LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPP 05/20/96 05/20/96 $288.20 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES < *> $2,049.49* GENERAL SUPPLIES 042779 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI 7160 165862 05/20/96 $686.93 GENERAL SPORTS < *> $686.93* CASH MGMT SEMINAR 043096 FINANCE CONF & SCHOOLS 165863 05/20/96 $300.00 GFOA < *> .$300.00* OVRPYMT FIRE METER 050396 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. 165864 05/20/96 $1,411.17 GITTLEMAN CORP <,> $1,411.17* 050996 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 8010 165865 05/20/96 75.00 $75.00* GOLF MINNESOTA < *> GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9409 PRO SHOP SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 560 COST OF GDS -PR 5604 165866 05/20/96 $659.25 $657.25 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9416 S 9424 PRO PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5604 05/20/96 05/20/96 $549.25 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO (_ CIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM pag CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ------- -------------- DESCRIPTION - -_- - - - - -- INVOICE ------ PROGRAM--- - - - - - - -- - - -- OBJECT ----- PO -NUM- --------------------------------------------------- < *> - $1,865.75* 165867 05/20/96 $94.45 GRAINGER BELT 49537925 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7595 05/26/96 $58.33 GRAINGER CASTORS /SHOP 49539144 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7730 05/20/96 $39.80 GRAINGER CUTTING -DRILL FLUID 49792210 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7896 < *> $192.58* 165868 05/20/96 $858.95 GREER, PAT SERVICE EDINBOROOUGH/ 050196 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $858.95* 165869 05/20/96 $17,801.00 GREUPNER,.JOE LESSONS 051496 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF < *> $17,801.00* 165870 05/20/96 $556.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99515 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD,LIQU 05/20/96 $4,953.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99517 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $390.84 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99519 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $1,554.38 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99520 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $38.72 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99521 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $2,590.57 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99523 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $3,479.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 02237 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $1,384.82 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 02242 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $19.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 02243 YORK.SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $14,968.12* 165871 05/20/96 $47.92. HARMON GLASS REPLACE GLASS 72002970 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7700 . < *> $47.92* 165872 05/20/96 $250.00 HAUGEN, TODD CLEAN 1 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP P7861 < *> $250.00* 165873 05/20/96 $16,196.60 HEALTH PARTNERS HOSPITALIZATION 4681132 CENT SVC GENER.HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $16,196.60* 165874 05/20/96 $61.99 HEATH, JODY GENERAL SUPPLIES -POLI 051396 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $61.99* 165875 05/20/96 $16.00 HEEGAARD, ROGER GHIN HANDICAP REFUND 050196 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC < *> $16.00* 165876 05/20/96 $104.25 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 10830 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4771 05/20/96 $268.20 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 050696 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5634 < *> $372.45* 165877 05/20/96 $177.76 HELD, J.F. REIMB /BLOWN_ TIRES 050396 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $177.76* 165878 05/20/96 $763.72 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL EMS SUPPLIES -MARCH 4873 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 6028 < *> $763.72* 165879 05/20/96 $70.29 HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYOR COMPUTER MAP OF CITY 111 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 6732 < *> $70.29* 165880 05/20/96 $300.00 HOFFMAN, FRANCIS REIMBURSMENT CONFEREN 051396 PWKS ADMIN GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $300.00* COUNCIL CHECK MEGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ----- OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM ----- --------------------- - - -- ------------------------ ---------- -------------------------- ------- ------- ----- 165881 05/20/96 $100.00 ROFFMAN, WILLIAM POLICE SRVICES MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 165882 05/20/96 $167.75 HOHENSTEIN INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148133 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $238.75 HOHENSTEIN INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149303 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $406.50* 165883 05/20/96 $40.00 HOOD, ELISABETH REFUND TENNIS 050896 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F' <*> $40.00* TO MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 051396 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE 165884 05/20/96 $143.10 HORWATH, <*1 $143.10* 165885 05/20/96 $33.00 HRA /CITY OF EDINA PARKING PERMIT 050896 LIQUOR 50TH ST LIC & PERMITS <*> $33.00* TOWELS,RUGS 989190 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 165886 05/20/96 $49.32 HUEBSCH 05/20/96 $54.12 HUEBSCH TOWELS,RUGS 993198 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI � *> $103.44* NSTRUCTION C CART /DECK EXPANSION 041996 CLUBHOUSE ADDT STATE AID 6861 165887 05/20/96 $1,448.00 HUNERBERG CO < *> $,1,448.00* 165888 05/20/96 $499.95 HYDRANT SPECIALIST REPAIR HYDRANT 1016 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 7938 < *> $499.95* 16588.9 05/20/96 $3,186.05 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 9498 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 1091 *� $3,186.05* 165890 05/20/96 $94.50 ICBO 2 CODE REFERENCE BOOK 050796 INSPECTIONS BOOKS & PAMPHL <*> $94.50* 165891 05/20/96 $217.32 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTEN PARTS FOR ADVANCE 9808 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 7549 <*> $217.32* 165892 05/20/96 $109.23 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS PHONE PROBLEM 20380 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS <*> $109.23* 165893 05/20/96 $226.51 INTOXIMETERS INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 96009293 POLICE DEPT. G.EQUIP MAINT 6706 +� $226.51* CARTRIDGE 37964A CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI P8032 165894 05/20/96 $69.05 IOS <*> $69.05* $2(12.30 J DAVTS MAPKTNr, SYSTEMS MIIRSF. SUPPLIES (1907 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLY 7639 1658.1 nom. /20/ *� $202.30* 16.5896 05/20/96 $286.01 J.H. CARSON ELECTRICAL C BULBS 04106029 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7503 05/20/96 $276.78 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ELECTRICAL PARTS /SHOP 04120381 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7522 05/20/96 $357.24 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C REPAIR PARTS 04196061 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 7560 <*> $920.03* 165897 05/20/96 $70.00 JAFFEE, JUDY REFUND TENNIS 050696 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F <*> $70.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 165898. 05/20/96 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F POLICE SERVICES MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES <►> $100.00* 165899 05/20/96 $70.69 JERRY'S FOODS COST OF GENERAL GOODS SOLD SUPPLIES 041996 041996 GRILL ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 05/20/96 $159.97 $21.00 JERRY'S JERRY'S FOODS FOODS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041996 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 05/20/96 $3.17 JERRY'S FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 041996 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL *> $254.83* 165901 05/20/96 $47.96 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $294.05 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $409.28 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $165.53 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $754.02 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $77.75 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $43.42 JERRY'.S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $33.08 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $60.72 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $14.94 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 ST'LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $92.40 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $13.13 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPLI' 05/20/96 $194.01 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $55.18 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $11.42 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $1.66 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 NORMAN. MAINT. GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $3.57 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $58.70 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $123.14 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 043096 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $2,453.96* 165902 05/20/96 $671.78 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING. 5332 INSPECTIONS PRINTING P7672 05/20/96 $398.31 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 5454 ELECTION PRINTING 7597 05/20/96 $43.40 JERRY'S PRINTING POST CARD PRINTING 5593 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 7776 05/20/96 $1,462.25 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 5534 POOL ADMIN PRINTING 7682 05/20/96 $136.13 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 5660 PARK ADMIN. PRINTING 05/20/96 $991.00 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 5632 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 5493 05/20/96 $131.50 JERRY'S PRINTING RECYCLING GUIDE 5692 RECYCLING PRINTING 7983 < *> $3,834.37* 165903 05/20/96 $60.00 JETSON, DIANA REFUND TENNIS 051396 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $60 -.00* 165904 05/20/96 $380.32 JIM HATCH SALES RUBBISH PLUCKER .6518 SPRING CLEANUP GENERAL SUPPLI 7459 05/20/96 $206.39 JIM HATCH SALES LITTER BAGS 6525 SPRING CLEANUP GENERAL SUPPLI 7570 05/20/96 $372.11 JIM IIATCII SALES SHOVELS /BROOMS 6560 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 7786 c *> $958.82* 165906 05/20/96 $658.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414743 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $712.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414750 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $195.73 JOIINSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414768 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $3,236.90, JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5414776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $60.40 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414784 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $266.88 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414792 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $466.81 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $505.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414818 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK nBGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC REPAIRS 425696 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 7865 Jordon Beverage COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 26692 page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 27087 VENDOR CST OF GDS BEE DESCRIPTION ----- ---- -- INVOICE ------- --- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM _ __ $2,180.99 JOHNSON ---------------------------------- WINE CO: COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5414826 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU WINE 165906 05/20/96 05/20/96 $241.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414834 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE 05/20/96 $1,257.61 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5414842 YORK SELLING SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $2,677.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 5414859 5414867 YORK YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $447.94 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD LI 5414875 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU ' 05/20/96 $2,637.74 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453501 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $60.40 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE CO. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453519 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $894.67 $844.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453527 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $465.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453535 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD GD WINE LIQU 05/20/96 $4,128.51 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS _SOLD LI 5453543 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $314.42 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453576 50TH ST SELLIN SELLIN CST. CST OF OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $369.53 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 5453584 5453592 50TH ST 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $347.39 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD LI 5453600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $2,495.96 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE CO. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453618 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $807.86 $220.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453626 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 05/20/96 $633.97 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5453634 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU 05/20/96 $3,332.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 5453642 YORK SELLING <i> $30,461.01* 165907 05/20/96 $72.00 JOHNSON, JAMES CLASS REFUND 050496 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F <i> $72.00* 165908 05/20/96 $29.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI_ GENERAL SUPPLIES 051496 051496 ART CENTER BLD ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI CRAFT SUPPLIES 05/20/96 $93.14 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 051496 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 05/20/96 $12.50 JOHNSON, NAOMI <i> $135.04* 165909 05/20/96 $262.99 JOHNSON, TOM C014T ED- POLICE 051396 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS " <i> $262.99* - - 165910 05/20/96 165911 05/20/96 165912 05/20/96 05/20/96 165913 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 165914 05/20/96 165915 05/20/96 165916 05/20/96 05/20/96 $100.00 $100.00* $194.19 $194.19* $170.00 $156.40 $326.40* $1,667.77 $729.45 $607.40 $3,004.62* $237.23 $237.23* $4.00 $4.00* $157.40 $37.31 JOHNSON, WALTER POLICE SERVICES MAY.1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC REPAIRS 425696 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 7865 Jordon Beverage COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 26692 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE Jordon Beverage COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 27087 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE JP FOODSERVICES INC JP FOODSERVICES INC JP FOODSERVICES INC JR JOHNSON SUPPLY JULIEN, DIANE JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES MUMS LICENSES & PERMITS LUMBER BELTS & BRUSHES 043096 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 043096 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 043096 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 34441 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 8161 051096 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 95552 ED BUILDING & PAINT 7381 95946 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7401 G, ,:IL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 165916 05/20/96 $16.40 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 96336 ED BUILDING & PAINT 7574 05/20/96 $35.75 JUSTUS LUMBER CEDAR SHINGLES 98378 ED BUILDING & PAINT 7658 05/20/96 $15.76 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 98523 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 7561 < *> $262.62* 165917 05/20/96 $106.39 KANE SERVICE, THE 4/19,4/20 SIMS 7089575 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 05/20/96 $106.39 KANE SERVICE, THE 4/26,4/27 SIMS 7104340 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $212.78* 165918- 05/20/96 - $29.02 KAR PRODUCTS SHOP SUPPLIES 606809 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5205 05/20/96 $176.82 KAR PRODUCTS SHOP SUPPLIES 611131 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 7877 < *> $147.80* 165919 05/20/96 $388.54 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2680226 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5612 < *> $388.54* 165920 05/20/96 $21.27 KINKO'S. PRINTING 041796 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 7869 05/20/96 $91.59 KINKO'S PRINTING 050196 COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING < *> $112.86* 165921 05/20/96 $29.00 KISSELL, SUSAN CLASS REFUND 050496 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $29.00* 165922 05/20/96 $407.99 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIALS 199086 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6718 05/20/96 $404.75 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIALS 199599 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6718 05/20/96 $559.55 KNOX C014M CREDIT MATERIALS 203197 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 6718 05/20/96 $389.12 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES FOR NEW OFFI 203198 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7529 05/20/96 $105.95 KNOX COMM CREDIT TOOLS 203834 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 7637 05/20/96 $37.12 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 204615 RANGE LUMBER 7624 05/20/96 $19.62 KNOX COMM CREDIT TARP 205114 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7736 05/20/96 $55.64 KNOX•COMM CREDIT TOOLS FOR TOPSIDE BLD 205616 BUILDING MAINT.TOOLS 7746 05/20/96 $19.62 KNOX COMM CREDIT BLONDS FOR PARK OFFIC 206052 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7912 05/20/96 $37.13 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 206175 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7876 05/20/96 $220.41 KNOX_ COMM CREDIT TOOLS 206358 GENERAL STORM TOOLS 7929 < *> $2,256.90* 165923 05/20/96 $250.04 KOCH, C. ROBERT ELECTION DAY SERVICES 050996 ELECTION ADVERTISING LE < *> $250.04* 165924 05/20/96 $239.92 KONTERS, VIK UNIFORM ALLOWANCE -POL 050196 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $239.92* 165925 05/20/96 $34.91 KOSS PAINT & WALLPAPER GENERAL SUPPLIES 94172 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 7869 < *> $34.91* 165926 05/20/96 $63.87 KRON, BILL TENNIS BALL PICKER 051496 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $63.87* 165927 05/20/96 $1,560.50 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 156633 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1,225.10 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 156668 SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $21.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 050196/Y YORK SELLING. CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1,127.25 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 157147 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> - $3,934.55* 165928 05/20/96 $380.00 LAUKKA MGMT INC GARBAGE INSPECTION RE 050796 CITY COUNCIL GARAGE INSP page 14. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION -- -- ------- - - - - -- - - -- --------------- - CHECK NO - ---------------------- *� $380.00* 1444657 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS- 7508 05/20/96 $167.69 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. NUTS 165929 $167.69* CON REPAIRS 043096 /A ART CENTER BLD CONTR REPAIRS 165930 05/20/96 $84.94 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY O43096/G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY 05/20/96 $34.32 LEEF BROS. INC. < *� $119.26* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 53641 YORK SELLING GDS MIX 165931 05/20/96 $204.76 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 53784 50TH STSELLIN CST OF 05/20/96 $55.15 LEHMANN FARMS < *> $259.91* SOD & BLACK DIRT 043096 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 165932 05/20/96 $1,199.08 LEITNER COMPANY < *> $1,199.08* COST OF GOODS - PRO S 940.6 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5613 165933 05/20/96 $141.96 LESSMAN, GREG $141.96* 004014. NORMANDALE GC CLEANING SUPPL 5636 05/20/96 $6.92 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SOAP 165934 $6.92* < *> COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 5907 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 165935 05/20/96 $90.00 LINCOLN DIST CO < *> $90.00* 9995 MEDIA LAB ADVERT OTHER 165936 05/20/96 $25.77 LINHOFF MEDIA ADV < *> $25.77* DATA PROCESSING AR0496 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN 5187 165937 05/20/96 $3,877.34 LOGIS LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0496 ASSESSING GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN DATA PROCESSIN 05/20/96 05/20/96 $2,195. 08 $3,600.61 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING AR0496 AR0496 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSIN 05/20/96 $25.28 LOGIS LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0496 LIQUOR YORK GE LIQUOR DATA PROCESSIN DATA PROCESSIN 05/0/96 2 $25.28 DATA PROCESSING AR0496 VERNON 05/20/96 $25.28 LOGIS LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI REPAIR PARTS 215508 MAINT OF COURS OF COURS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 88176 8026 165938 05/20/96 $643.90 $6.36 LONG LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI REPAIR PARTS 215799 - MAINT 05/20/96 < *> $650.26* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 45912 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX MIX 165939 05/20/96 $261.60 M AMUNDSON M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 45979 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $383.68 $366.24 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD OF GOODS SOLD MI 46055 BE 46187 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $244.16 M AMUNDSON COST CST OF GDS MIX GDS MIX 05/20/96 $279.04 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 46281 YORK SELLINGIN CST OF 05/20/96 $523.20 M AMUNDSON < *> $2,057.92' QUARTERLY MEETING 050696 PARK MAINTENAN CONF &.SCHOOLS 7949 165940 05/20/96 $20.92 M.P.S.A. < *> $20.00* SWEEP - 2964447 EQUIPMENT EOFER REPAIR IRPARTSS P7454 165941 05/20/96 $887.11 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REFILL 05/20/96 < *� $1,177.68* . COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - - DESCRIPTION - - -- - --- -- - - - -- INVOICE ---- PROGRAM -- ---- -------- - OBJECT -- - - - -PO - NUM -- __- 05/20/96 $100.00 ----- ---- - - - MACHOLDA,ED PETTY CASH 050396 SWIM FROG PETTY CASH 165942 05/20/96 $60.00 MACHOLDA,ED CHANGE FUND 050396 SWIM PROG CHANGE FUND < *� $160.00* 165943 05/20/96 $5.36 MANGEN, DEB MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL.SERVICES 051496 051496 ELECTION ELECTION MEETING EXPENS PROF SERVICES 05/20/96 05/20/96 $10.00 $9.61 MANGEN, DEB MANGEN, DEB MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 051496 ELECTION MILEAGE *� $24.97* 165945 05/20/96 $2,339.04 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE MI 508526 508527 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $31.45 MARK VII SALES COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD GOODS SOLD BE 508532 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $1,123.20 $43.20 MARK VII MARK VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 508533 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $118.00 MARK VII. SALES BEER .043096 BE 043096/V NORMANDALE GC VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 -$4.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD GOODS SOLD BE 510856 YORK SELLING- CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $945.25 $1,823.50 MARK VII MARK VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 511095 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $45.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 511096 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX BEE 05/20/96 $3,$45.70 MARK VII SALES_ COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 511103 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS 05/20/96 $11.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 511104 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $87.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 511118 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX . 05/20/96 $2,413.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 51117 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE MIX 05/20/96 $36.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 513510 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS 05/20/96 $301.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 513511 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $199.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 513512 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $733.27 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 513772 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE GDS MIX 05/20/96 $49.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 513773 YORK SELLING CST OF 165946 05/20/96 $27.00 MARQUARDT, BARBARA CLASS REFUND 050496 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < * >. $27.00* 165947 05/20/96 $35.18 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 264321 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 7223 < *> $35.18* 165948 05/20/96 $285.80 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1370423 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR COST OF GDS -PR 5611 5611 05/20/96 $571.84 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1364160 PRO SHOP < *> $857.64* 165949 05/20/96 $234.60 MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD 7592520 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5638 < *> $234.60* 165950. 05/20/96 $186.10 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 LUMBER FOR ARNESON TE 667838 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLI 7959 7605 05/20/96 $57.68 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 MISC SUPPLIES 14223 14351 RANGE MAINT OF COORS GENERAL SUPPLI 7640 05/20/96 05/20/96 $12.28 $30.76 MENARDS MENARDS ACCT #30240251 ACCT #30240251 SUPPLIES GFI PIG TAIL 14429 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7825 05/20/96 $60.15 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 #30240251 LUMBER LUMBER /SUPPLIES 14473 14578 GRILL RANGE LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLI 7765 7868 05/20/96 05/20/96 $150.39 $54.12 MENARDS MENARDS ACCT ACCT #30240251 CAULK,SANDPAPER 10167 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 8160 < +> $551.48* 165951 05/20/96 $100.00 MERFELD, BURT POLICE SERVICE MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 165952 05/20/96 $497.88 MERIT SUPPLY WASH & WAX 42081- EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7555 COUNCIL CHECK ..r'.GISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -- --------------------------------- MERIT - --------------------------------------------- 165952 05/20/96 $463.59 MERIT SUPPLY SHAMPOO,TOWELS 42126 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 777 SUPPLI 7731 05/20/96 $$47.53 MERIT SUPPLY CONCRETE 42136 08 FIREUDEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7830 05/20/96 $47.59 MERIT SUPPLY <*> $1,181.59* 165953 05/20/96 $115.86 MESSERLI & KRAMER FEE COLLECTION 020194 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 05/20/96 $10.00 MESSERLI & KRAt1ER COLLECT FEES 28904. GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 05/20/96 $220.84 MESSERLI & KRAMER COLLECT FEES 31434 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 042496 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 05/20/96 $155.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER COLLECT FEES 05/20/96 $897.35 MESSERLI & KRAMER COLLECT FEES 36289 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES *� $1,399.05* 165954 05/20/96 - $42.55 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 12164 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $261.83 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 12330 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 7694 05/20/96 $444.74 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY BALLFIELL SUPPLIES 12331 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 7423 05/20/96 $131.45. METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 12950 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL <*> $795.47* 165955 05/20/96 $288,506.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WAS SEWER SERVICE 050196 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR <*> $288,506.00* 165956 05/20/96 $7.20 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 050496 VANVALKENSURG COST OF GD SOL 7588 <*> $7.20* 165957 05/20/96 $477.42 MID CON SYSTEMS INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 020729 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7567 <*> $477.42* 165958 05/20/96 $136.55 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY REPAIR WORK 221044 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7281 05/20/96 $136.55 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES 221470 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 7556 <*> $273.10* 165959 05/20/96 $8.67 MIDWEST REFRESHMENTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 148937 NORMANDALE GC COST OF GD SOL 7869 <*> $8.67* 165960 05/20/96 $50.40 MIDWEST VENDING INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 857 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5639 <*> $50.40* ' 165961 05/20/96 $12.24 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER RENTAL FEE 0221205 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI 6581 05/20/96 $105.2.8 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER <*> $117.52* 165962 05/20/96 $800.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SEWER LINES 030823 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS P7905 05/20/96 $440.00 MINNEAPOLIS F. SUBURBAN S REPAIR CURB STOP 30822 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 7906 <*> $1,240.00* 463866 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6613 165963 05/20/96 - $14.05 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA OXYGEN 81049603 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6616 05/20/96 $25.05 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 02 *> $11.00* 165964 05/20/96 $143.08 MINNEAPOLIS SPOKESMAN 11F.1,P WANTED ADS 19630 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL <*> $143.08* $990.60 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 165966 05/20/96 052096 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 05/20/96 $680.32 MINNEGASCO HEAT HEAT 052096 PW BUILDING HEAT 05/20/96 $4,810.42 MINNEGASCO CiCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - - -- OBJECT PO -NUM- ------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 165966 05/20/96 $2,044.76 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 05/20/96 $358.67 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 05/20/96 $20.77 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 POOL OPERATION HEAT 05/20/96 $1,953.62 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 05/20/96 $259.54 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 05/20/96 $7,.810.78 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 GOLF DOME HEAT 05/20/96 $3,139.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 05/20/96 $2,466.99 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 ED BUILDING & HEAT 05/20/96 $588.92 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 05/20/96 $3,328.52 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 05/20/96 $60.26 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 05/20/96 $124.99 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 05/20/96 $117.00 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 05/20/96 $725.34 MINNEGASCO HEAT 052096 ED BUILDING & 'HEAT < *> $29,481.48* 165967 05/20/96 $32.10 MINNESOTA CLAY USA CRAFT SUPPLIES 13659 ART SUPPLY GIF.'CRAFT SUPPLIES 7623 05/20/96 $47.15 MINNESOTA CLAY USA COST OF GOODS SOLD 13882 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 7628 < *> $79.25* 165968 05/20/96 $119.90 MINNESOTA COALITION FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 051396 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES < *> $119.90* 165969 05/20/96 $171.04 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC BROWN JERSEY GLOVES 124237 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7688 < *> $171.04* 165970 05/20/96 $195.00 MINNESOTA INSTITUTE LEGA CONT ED- POLICE 051396 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $195.00* 165971 05/20/96 $220.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 042496 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $220.00* 165972 05/20/96 $21.80 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO BOARD OF REVIEW NOTIC 13847 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/20/96 $102.46 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO NOTICE•OF SPECIAL ELE 14361 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/20/96 $21.80 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO P.H. COMP PLAN AMEND 14362 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/20/96 $83.64 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO NOT OF PUB IMP HEARIN 14783 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/20/96 $67.24 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO NOT OF PUBLIC HEARING 14784 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE < *> $296.94* 165973 05/20/96 $32.75 MINNESOTA WANNER FIRE DEPT - NOZZLE 28903 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7262 < *> $32.75* 165974 05/20/96 $2,062.50 MINNETONKA IRON WORKS BALANCE CONTRACT 1483 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 5396 05/20/96 $1,960.00 MINNETONKA IRON WORKS IRON RAIL ETC 1484 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 6443 < *> $4,022.50* 165975 05/20/96 $82.00 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER WINDOWS 1615343 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN < *> $82.00* 165976 05/20/96 $1,461.85 MN STATE TREASURER BUIL STATE SURCHARGE 050296 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX < *> $1,461.85* 165977 05/20/96 $450.00 MN WOMENS PRESS INC HELP WANTED ADS 00010567 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $450.00* COUNCIL CHECK "SGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page 18 VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- 165978 05/20/96 $340.10 MOORE MEDICAL EMS SUPPLIES 8559179 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP *> $340.10* 90.53 MR H/ SOCCER WORLD SOCCER NETS 99167 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 7864 165979 05/20/96 $80.53• 165980 05/20/96 $21.00 MRPA WORKSHOP 050596 PLAYGROUND & T PROF SERVICES <*> $21.00* 165981 05/20/96 $610.00 MSP COMMUNICATIONS- ADVERTISING OTHER 37618 PRO SHOP ADVERT OTHER 165982 05/20/96 $949.25* MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS I90393 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7480 05/20/96 $110.63 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 293065 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7872 05/20/96 $201.76 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR OF FOUNTAIN 193217 MAINT OF COORS CONTR REPAIRS 7879 05/20/96 $32.42 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I93373 BD BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 7973 05/20/96 $295.21 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR OF FOUNTAIN 194273 MAINT OF COURS CONTR REPAIRS 8028 <*> $1,089.27* 165983 05/20/96 $488.60 NAME BRAND SPORTS ORANGE T'S 042496 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7020 ' 05/20/96 $350.00 NAME BRAND SPORTS ORANGE TS 042496 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7020 05/20/96 $350.00 NAME BRAND SPORTS ORANGE T'S 042496 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 7020 <*> $1,188.60* F FOUNDATION BOOKLETS 94361 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 7471 165984 05/20/96 $56.25 NATIONAL GOL <,> $56.25* DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD 519624 ARENA CONCESSI COST OF GD SOL 4775 165985 05/20/96 $174.71 NEBCO EVANS <*> $174.71• 165986 05/20/96 $73.84 NELSON, DAVID CONT ED /POLICE 050296 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOLS <*> $73.84* $18.00 NEXTEL COM 165987 05/20/96 MUNICATIONS'IN REPAIR RADIO 28655 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 05/20/96 $82.00 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN REPAIR RADIO 28656 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 05/20/9 $37._80 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN REPAIR RADIO 28725 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 6 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 05/20/96 $166.02 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN RADIO REPAIR 28811 <*> $303.82* 165988 05/20/96 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK POLICE SERVICES MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES <*> $100.00* 1659$9 05/20/96 $1,162.51 NORBACK, FLORENCE ELECTION SERVICES 050996 ELECTION ADVERTISING LE <*> $1,162.51* 165990 05/20/96 $629.49 NORBACK, HOWARD ELECTION SERVICES 050996 ELECTION ADVERTISING LE < *> $629.49• 165991 05/20/96 $191.70 NORTH STAR CONCRETE COMP CONCRETE COLUMNS 7252101 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 7569 <*> $191.70* TURF 165992 05/20/96 $131.01 N RTH STAR TURF REPAIREPARTSEDER /BALA 120410 MAINT POFGCOURS REPAIR &PARTSP 7641 05/20/96 $43,9.31 NORTH STAR TURF GRASS SEED 121113 FIELD IES 121386 MAINT OF COO OF COURS SEED 7747 05/20/96 $36.01 NORTH STAR TURF COURSE SUPPLRS GENERAL SUPPLI 7878 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR- - - -- DESCRIPTION --- - - -- -- - - - - -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM --- ---- - OBJECT - ---- PO NUM -- ----------- 165992 ---- ------ 05/20/96 ---- ---- ------- $293.51 -- - - - - -- - --- NORTH STAR TURF - --- - - REPAIR PARTS 121393 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 7878 <*> $1,182.59* 165993 05/20/96 $26.56 NORTHERN SUPPLIES 373099TI MAINT OF COORS GENERAL SUPPLI 7483 ►> $26.56* 165994 05/20/96 $91.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 39719 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $201.60 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40005 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $37.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40479 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $330.00* 165995 05/20/96 $91.14 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 241752 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 7626 05/20/96 $15.70 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CRAFT SUPPLIES 241996 ART.CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 7626 05/20/96 $146.28 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 242022 ART SUPPLY GIF COST:OF GD SOL 7630 *> $253.12* 165996 05/20/96 $58.58 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28483 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7153 05/20/96 $322.16 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28598 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7153 05/20/96 $312.41 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28601 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 05/20/96 $351.41 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28602 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 05/20/96 $312.41 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28641 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7153 05/20/96 $312.41 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW28728 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 7153 < *> $1,669.38* 165997 05/20/96 $96.39 NOVAK'S GARAGE CONT REPAIRS D2056 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 7598 < *> $96.39* 165999 05/20/96 $3.14 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $22,410.20 NSP LIGHT -& POWER 052096 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $3,170.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $4,377.09 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $100.73 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $87.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $135.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $3,316.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $1,919.18 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $1,563.71 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $564.41 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $766.93 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $1,115.30 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $785.86 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $264.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $71.60 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $165.64 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $8,732.24 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $224.21 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 GUN RANGE LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $973.61 NSP I.IGIIT & POWER 052096 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $4,802.66 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $9.71 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $711.51 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $70.00 NSP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 052096 AQUATIC.WEEDS PROF SERVICES 05/20/96 $1,224.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $620.52 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $1,078.33 NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 05/20/96 $13,177.40 -NSP LIGHT & POWER 052096 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER page 20 COUNCIL CHECK _8GISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION _ _ __ _'.- ------------------ "LIGHT ---------------- 052096 -" " - " " "- ED BUILDING & LIGFFT & --------------- - -- POWER "__________ _________________________ 05/20/96 $312.26 NSP & POWER 165999 $72,755.15' - PRO S 10267800 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6609 05/20/96 $59.40 ODYSSEY GOLF COST OF GOODS 166000 <*> $59.40* 1782 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 8168 05/20/96 $23.17 OFFICE MAX INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 166001 ,*> $23.17* 123181 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 7646 05/20/96 $50. 99+ OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE SFFOP SUPPLIES 166002 $50.99* <*> CONTROL 042596 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 8203 166003 05/20/96 $59.64 ORKIN $59.64' COST OF GOODS SOLD 4277500 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 5644 166004 05/20/96 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC <t> $74.00* POOL PAK CHECK 2407 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 166005 05/20/96 $87.00 OWENS SERVICE CO <*> $87.00* 57264800 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS 05/20/96 $139.00 PADGETT- THOMPSON SCHOOL 166006 *� $139.00* A047625 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5033 05/20/96 $43.18* PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES PAGING SERVICE 166007 $ <*> 646 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 6926 05/20/96 $800.00 PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION GUTTERS 166008 7221501 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES 166009 05/20/96 $32.34 PARAGON CABLE CABLE <*> $32.34* B TESTS 052796 GENERAL {BILLIN PROF SERVICES 166010 05/20/96 $78.60 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE MEDICAL CE HEP DRUG TESTING 052796 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 05/20/96 $182.50 PARK NICOLLET <*> $261.10* REPAIR PARTS 1174719 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 166011 05/20/96 - $24.00 $95.85 PARTS PLUS PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1175615 1177306 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS PARTS 05/20/96 05/20/96 $95.68 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1179752 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS. 05/20/96 - $10.00 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1179986 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS PARTS 05/20/96 $21.63 $105.56 PARTS PLUS PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1180071 1181916 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96 05/20/96 "176.42 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1182734 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96. $14.91 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1183115 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96 $66.84 PARTS PLUS $542.89• PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63183 VERNON SELLING CST OF YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE GD WINE 166013 05/20/96 $ 606.75 $233.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63185 BE 63186 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 05/20/96 $64.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 63187 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE WINE 05/20/96 $26.80 PAUSTIS & SONS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63188 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF CST OF GD GD WINE 05/20/96 $397.80 PAUSTIS PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63257 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $108.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 0503 05/20/96 - $69.96 c- -.+CIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE • PROGRAM --- --------------- OBJECT PO NUM ----- -- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 166013 05/20/96 $619.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63443 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $63.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 63444 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $130.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 63446 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $677.30 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63447 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $42.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 63448 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $26.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 63449 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $440.75 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF- -GOODS SOLD WI 63450 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $25.79 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 63457 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $72.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43577 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE *> $3,464.63* 166014 05/20/96 $111.95 PBE PERFORMANCE FORMULA A785557 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7743 166015 05/20/96 $21.00 PC NOVICE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 051396 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $21.00* 166016 05/20/96 $29.25 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 22993205 50TH.ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $47.75 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 23093204 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $111.75 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 23093407 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $117.70 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF_GOODS SOLD MI 23793206 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $306.45* 166017 05/20/96 $2,145.00 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2035 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $2,145.00* 166018 05/20/96 $4,025.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JI72789 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $4,025.00* 166019 05/20/96 $90.00 PETERSON, SHARON CLASS REFUND 050496 ART CNTR FROG REGISTRATION F < *> $90.00* 166022 05/20/96 -$3.79 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1818210 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $245.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825678 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $1,503.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825686 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $976.43 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825694 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $343.99 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1825702 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $1,229.75 P11IL.LIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825710 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $1,118.04 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825728 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $369.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825736 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $166.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1825744 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $572.92 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1825751 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $318.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825769 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $1,409.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825777 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $918.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1825785 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $38.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1825793 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $723.73 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1825801 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $116.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1843960 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $244.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1844588 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $294.5,0 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1844596 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $902.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851096 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $513.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851104 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $366.53 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1851112 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/20/96 $166.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST.OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851120 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $1,749.53 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1851136 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 166026 05/20/96 $1,189.56 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO PRO S 666525 S 666526 PRO PRO SHOP SHOP COST COST page 22 COUNCIL CHECK .,8GISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996,_ 7:40 PM RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST COST OF OF GOODS - GOODS - PRO S 666527 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5619 VENDOR $133.50 DESCRIPTION RALPH INVOICE PROGRAM COST OBJECT NUM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT PRO SHOP COST OF -------------------------------------------------- 5619 05/20/96 $117.98 POLO RALPH RALPH LAUREN LAUREN -- --------- 05-20----- - - ---- - -------------------------------- PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851146 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 166022 05/20/96 05/20/96 $7S9.20--- 759.2- S759.20 $281.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 1851153 1851161 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE $116.00 05/20/96 $62.64 'PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD LI 1851179 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COMPANY 05/20/96 $778.08 PHILLIPS WINE,& SPIRITS SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851187 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $2,050.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851195 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $854.00 PHILLIPS WINE & WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1851203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $48.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1851211 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $196.09 PHILLIPS *� $19,314.59* 05/20/96 $42.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI MI 06705. 88307 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GDS MIX GDS MIX 166023 05/20/96 $36.50 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD MI 88308 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $121.25 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 88309 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX MIX 05/20/96 $247.55 PINNACLE'DISTRIBUTING PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06732 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS 05/20/96 $43.00 $490.30* $64.18 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL JACK -TOP 1697654 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7727 166024 05/20/96 <,> $64.18* PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 312941 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 166025 05/20/96 $34.08 <*> $34.08* 166026 05/20/96 $1,189.56 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO PRO S 666525 S 666526 PRO PRO SHOP SHOP COST COST OF OF GDS -PR GDS -PR 5619 5619 05/20/96 $286.40 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST COST OF OF GOODS - GOODS - PRO S 666527 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5619 05/20/96 $133.50 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 671712 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5619 05/20/96 $117.98 POLO RALPH RALPH LAUREN LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 671713 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5619 05/20/96 $28.56 POLO 05/20/96 $746.17 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $922.29 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $116.00 $1,756.00* WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $1,176.51 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $572.25 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 166027 05/20/96 $69.83 POMMER CO FOR BROCHURES 050796 <*> POSTAGE $69.83* 051396 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 166028 05/20/96 $225.00 POSTMASTER <*> $225.00* 166029 05/20/96 $832.00 POSTMASTER <*> $832.00* 166030 05/20/96 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER <*> $5,000.00* 166031 05/20/96 $495.23 PRINT SHOP, THE <*> $495.23* 166032 05/20/96 - $10.05 $376.55 PRIOR PRIOR WINE WINE COMPANY COMPANY 05/20/96 05/20/96 $816.35 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $746.17 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $922.29 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $116.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $1,176.51 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $572.25 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $920.55 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 05/20/96 $334.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY VOLUNTEER RECEPTION 040908 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 7982 POSTAGE NEWSLETTER 050396 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE POSTAGE FOR BROCHURES 050796 POOL ADMIN POSTAGE POSTAGE 051396 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 28212 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37279 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98808 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98809 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98810 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98811 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98812 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98813 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01608 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01609 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01610 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI 7576 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE vERNoN SELLING CST'OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST of GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 166032 05/20/96 $844.81 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01956 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $49.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 01957 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $470.93 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01958 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $49.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 01959 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/20/96 $229.63 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01960 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $7,614.09* 166033 05/20/96 $2,675.77 PROCARD PRINTERS REG SCORE CARDS 1740 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 7067 7066 05/20/96 $1,357.03 PROCARD PRINTERS EXEC SCORE CARDS 1754 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING < *> $4,032.80* 166034 05/20/96 $774.74 QUALITY WASTE DUMPSTER 043096 SPRING CLEANUP GENERAL SUPPLI < *> 1 $774.74* 166035 05/20/96 $1,779.46 RALPH LAUREN FOOTWEAR IN COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1509817 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5619 < *> $1,779.46* 166036 05/20/96 $173.65 RDO EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR 108528 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5443 < *> $173.65* 166037 05/20/96 $560.98 RED WING SHOES BOOTS 00679 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5164 05/20/96 $130.90 RED WING SHOES BOOTS 00679 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5164 05/20/96 $256.70 RED WING SHOES BOOTS 00679 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 5164 < *> $948.58* 166038 05/20/96 $410.24 REM SUPPLIES THEATRE LIGHTS 6002 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI .7846 05/20/96 $348.90 REM SUPPLIES LIGHT BULBS 6007 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 8214 < *> $759.14* 166039 05/20/96 $3,675.00 REMOTE EFFECT SYSTEM FIREWORKS DISPLAY 569 FIREWORKS GENERAL SUPPLI 7648 < *> $3,675.00* 166040 05/20/96 $77.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 043096/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1,826.16 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 174718 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1,775.50 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 174739 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $2,074.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 174740 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $39.90 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 174742 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1,840.15 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 175710 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $2,554.85 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 175712 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $2,038.35 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.175713 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 -$4.35 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 175713. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $85.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 176378 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $12,306.86* 166041 05/20/96 $8.79 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 3752576 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7853 05/20/96 $17.97 RITZ CAMERA FILM DEVELOPING 3754030 ST IMPROVEMENT CIP 8033 < *> $26.76* 166042 05/20/96 $308.87 ROLLINS OIL CO GAS -EXEC COURSE 68310 RANGE MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE GASOLINE 6300 6300 05/20/96 05/20/96 $877.68 $8,748.35 ROLLINS OIL CO ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE GASOLINE 68391_ 68460 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $9,934.90* 166043 05/20/96 $89.72 ROTHE, ALLEN PETTY CASH 050996 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $89.72* page 24 COUNCIL CHECK nSGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM PROGRAM------------------------- OBJECT PO NUM VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - - - - -- . CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT -------------- ------------- ------ 9551.00/ - CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 166044 05/20/96 380.00 $380.00* RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP ARCH COMME R OFFICE FOLDING CHAIRS 050196 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 166045 05/20/96 $191.59 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT < *> $191.59* FAM JAM ENT 050596 PLAYGROUND & T PROF SERVICES 166046. 05/20/96 $285.00 SCHATTAUER, JIM < *> $285.00* DECK /CART 392866 CLUBHOUSE ADDT CIP 8008 166047 05/20/96 $236.00 SCHERER BROS LUMBER < *> $236.00* CONT ED -FIRE 051396 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 166048 05/20/96 75.00 $75,00* SCHMITZ, THOMAS < *> 033574/0 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM 8169 166049- 05/20/96 359.44 $359.44* SEARCH INSTITUTE BOOKLETS < *> - SR755299 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 7478 166050 05/20/96 $60.52 SEARS TOOLS < *> $60.52* PERFORMANCE CENT LAKE 050696 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 166051 05/20/96 $320.00 SHANNON, JIM < *> $320.00* POLICE SERVICE MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SE RVICES 166052 05/20/96 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN < *> $100.00* $208-91 5552 PW BUILDING PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 7326 7427 . 166053 05/.0/96 05/20/96 58.10 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTISUPPLIESIES PAINTING SUPPLIES 5689 6002 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7526 05/20/96 $95.50 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTING SUPPLIES 6091 PW BUILDING OF COORS REPAIR PARTS PAINT 7533 7871 05/20/96 05/20/96 $29.01 $196.46 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 71624 MAINT < *> $587.98* SIMONE ENGINEERING INC FLOW METER F895040 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 7524 166054 05/20/96 $1,246.77 < *> $1,246.77* BALANCE DUE 050796 SOUTH HENNEPIN PROF SERVICES 166055 05/20/96 $7.50 SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL < *> $7.50* SOUT11SIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60708 YORK SELLING STSELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 166056 05/20/96 $1,335.80 3.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60714 50TH 05/20/96 05/20/96 F GOODS SOLD BE 60953 'YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/20/96 $1$769.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 60961 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE $588.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS < *> $5,390.30* COST OF GOODS - PRO S KE1775 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6612 166057 05/20/96 $382.20 SPALDING < *> $382.20* 20353 GENERAL MAINT ROAD OIL 9892 166058 05/20/96 $6,845.18 SPEC MATERIALS INC CREDIT CREDIT 20479 GENERAL MAINT ROAD OIL 05/20/96 - $195.58 SPEC MATERIALS INC < *> $6,649.60* EXEC OFFICE FOR PROS 2522896 GOLF PROG CLUB HOUSE EQU 7200 166059 05/20/96 $833.90 SPS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ------- DESCRIPTION -_ - - -- - - - -- INVOICE - - --- PROGRAM-- -_ - - -- _OBJECT - -- ' PO NUM --------- 166059 --- --------- 05/20/96 ----- ----- -- - $68.51 - ---- -_ - -- - -- SPS - - -- SUPPLIES FOR NORMANDA 2528760 NORMANDALE GC REPAIR PARTS 7562 < *> $902.41* 166060 05/20/96 $1,102.88 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROF ENG SERVICES 23155 STREET 70TH & CIP < *> $1,102.88* 166061 05/20/96 $1,272.00 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 043096 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 05/20/96 $493.00 STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING OTHER 043096 PRO SHOP ADVERT OTHER < *> $1.765.00* 166062 05/20/96 $19.05 STERLING FENCE INC FENCE REPAIRS AT COMP 14273 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR.PARTS 7559 < *> $19.05* 166063 05/20/96 $50.00 STONE, CLAUDIA REFUND TENNIS 050296 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $50.00* 166064 05/20/96 $42.00 STREICHERS VEHICLE MAINT 522241 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7981 05/20/96 $168.14 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 521251 POLICE DEPT. G.GENERAL SUPPLI 7849 < *> $210.14* 166065 05/20/96 - $212.30 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CREDIT CM15612 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6973 05/20/96 $2,020.84 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET TRANSMISSION 341121 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7435 05/20/96 - $745.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CREDIT CM34112 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96 $1,007.01 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR 271751 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7443 05/20/96 $28.65 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CYLINDER ASSM 35626 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 6973 05/20/96 $150.17 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET AIR PUMP 356311 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7712 05/20/96 $3.11 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GASKET. 35783 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7732 05/20/96 $2.64 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SEAL 35788 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7732 05/20/96 $78.39 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET COIL /WIRE ASM 36259 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7797 < *> $2,333.01* 166066 05/20/96 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD POLICE SERVICES MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 166067 05/20/96 $22.32 SYSTEM SUPPLY PAPER 4241 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 7852 < *> $22.32* 166068 05/20/96 $608.00 TAYLOR MADE COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3055456 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5602 05/20/96 $174.84 TAYLOR MADE COST OF GOODS - PRO S 03056183 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5602 05/20/96 $171.00 TAYLOR MADE COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3056184 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5602 < *> $953.84* 166069 05/20/96 $6.05 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT ANSEWRING SERVICE 041696 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $6.05* 166070 05/20/96 $73.43 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO UTILITY LAMPS 8756802 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 6951 05/20/96 $338.43 .TERMINAL SUPPLY CO TAPE /CLAMPS /TERMINALS 9334500 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7515 05/20/96 $124.44 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO MISC SUPPLIES 9334510 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 7515 05/20/96 $78.06 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO TERMINALS 9334502 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7515 < *> $614.36* 166071 05/20/96 $264.39 TERRY ANN SALES CO WATER CUPS 2142 GRILL CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 7613 7762 05/20/96 $264.39 TERRY ANN SALES CO SUPPLIES 2143 < *> $528.78* COUNCIL CHECK m6GISTER WED, MAY CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT _ __ _ ------------------------------ 166072 05/20/96 $486.81 05/20/96 $491.29 <*> $978.10* 166073 05/20/96 $259.82 <r> $259.82* 166074 05/20/96 $13,825.78 *� $13,825.78* 166075 05/20/96 $13.48 *� $13.48* 166076 05/20/96 $2,034.30 05/20/96 $195.00 05/20/96 $3,651.75 05/20/96 $321.00 <*> $6,202.05* 166077 05/ 20/96 $3,818.03 <*> $3,818.03* 166078 05/20/96 $1,179.75 05/20/96 $1,663.75 05/20/96 $1,663.75 $4,507.25* 166079 05/20/96 $4,774.40 <*> $4,774.40* 15, 1996, 7:40 PM VENDOR ------- --- ---- TESSMAN SEED INC TESSMAN SEED INC TEXACE CORPORTION THOMSEN- NYBECK THORKELSON, LAURA THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE DESCRIPTION - -- -- -- ------- - - - - -- CHAIN SAW FERTILIZER COST OF GOODS - PRO S PROSECUTING GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE BEER MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT REGISTER SERVICE REGISTER SERVICE REGISTER SERVICE FENCE AT NORMANDALE G INVOICE- S002319 5002976 85823 102846 051496' 80140 80414 80878 1627 1684 1684 1684 4539 PROGRAM ----- ---- --- -- - - -- -- GENERAL MAINT ED BUILDING & PRO SHOP LEGAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNGRILL SELLING LIQUOR PROG LIQUOR 50TH ST LIQUOR YORK GE VERNON LIQUOR NORMAN. MAINT. OBJECT--- - - GENERAL SUPPLI FERTILIZER COST OF GDS -PR PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLI CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE MACH. & EQUIP DATA PROCESSIN DATA PROCESSIN DATA PROCESSIN SHARED MAINT page 26 -PO- NUM - - -- 8035 7361 7676 7676 7201 7474 166080 <*> 166081 <*> 166082 <r> 166083 <*> 166084 <r> 166085 < *> 166086 166087 <*, 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/76 05/20/96 05/20/96 05/20/96 $30.00 $30.00* $49.26 $49.26* $11,663.43 $11,663.43* $1,130.00 $1,130.00* $53.25 $53.25* $4.80 $4.80* $47.86 $53.13 $100.99* $498.42 $498.42* TRETTEL, KATHY TROPHY WORLD TROSSEN WRIGHT ARCHITECT TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO TWIN CITY HOSE INC TWIN CITY OXYGEN (70 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO TWIN CITY SEED CO. VISUAL ARTS EDINBOROU RESERVES GENERAL SUPP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARAGE DOOR HOSE APRI1, TANK IMAGE CHAIN SAW PARTS CHAIN SAW PARTS SEED 052896 13401 050696 6539 1022100 268058 3617 3780 2621 ED ADMINISTRAT RESERVE PROGRA NEW STATION CLUBHOUSE ADDT STREET NAME SI FTRF DEPT. GEN TREES & MAINTE TREES & MAINTE MAINT OF COURS PRO SVC OTHER GENERAL SUPPLI EQUIP REPLACEM CIP REPAIR PARTS FIRST AID SUPP GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI SOD & DIRT 8005 7590 7715 5480 7514. 7750 7874 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - - -- DESCRIPTION - - -- - - ---- -- INVOICE - - PROGRAM - -- - - -- -- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM ------------- 166088 --- -- --- ------ 05/20/96 ---- ----- $29.57 - --- - -- ---- - - ----- - ULLRICH, CINDY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 051496 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE <*� $29.57* 166089 05/20/96 $375.00 UNDIS, PAT AC INSTRUCTOR 051496 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES c *, $375.00* 166090 05/20/96 $353.60 UNGERMAN CONSTRUCTION REFUND 051496 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING FERMI c *> $353.60* 166091 05/20/96 $957.87 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 050996 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 05/20/96 $590.00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 050996 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW c *, $1,547.87* 166092 05/20/96 $6,245.85 UNISOURCE PAPER 33920 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX P8212 c *, $6,245.85* 166093 05/20/96 $483.20 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS FERTILIZER 0011619 ED BUILDING & FERTILIZER 7670 05/20/96 $364.76 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS CHEMICALS - SNAPSHOT 0011620 ED BUILDING 6 CHEMICALS 7665 c *, $847.96* 166094 05/20/96 $781.01 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 15687200 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7325 7441/732 05/20/96 - $218.74 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT 93817100 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 05/20/96 $496.50 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP MISC ELECTRICAL 16074700 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 7571 05/20/96 $409.06 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP MISC ELECTRICAL 16075400 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 7693 05/20/96 - $332.22 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT 9391200 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7325 05/20/96 $14.35 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP MISC ELEC /PARKS 16123700 PW BUILDING -REPAIR PARTS 7704 < *> $1,149.96* 166095 05/20/96 $203.00 UNITED STATE GOLF ASSOCI RULE /EXTIQUETTE BOOKS A0979840.RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 7610 c *> $203.00* 166096 05/20/96 $5.72 US WEST CELLULAR US WEST 1003 - 1260914 042096/B INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $28.11 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 042096/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 05/20/96 $44.24 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 042096 /F,FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 05/20/96 $22.23 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 042096/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL c *> $100.30* 166097 05/20/96 $55.97 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 DARE TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $4,331.31 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $114.14 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $239.26 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $209.96 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $295.30 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $749.41 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $61.56 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $113.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $311.23 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $52.36 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $110.05 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 ED BUILDING 6 TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $113.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 05/20/96 $191.65 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052096 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE c *> $6,949.33* 166098 05/20/96 $109.27 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS FRAME RELAY D0860860 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE c *> $109.27* COUNCIL CHECK m8GISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page 28 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------- - CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -4 #6 ST IMPROVEMENT CI 166099 05120/96 $29,210.06 VALLEY PAVING l*> $29,210.06* 166100 05/20/96 $18.33 VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ LIQUOR ADVERTISING 040896 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 05/20/96 $18.33 VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ LIQUOR ADVERTISING 040696 05/20/96 $18.34 VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ LIQUOR ADVERTISING 040896 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER <*> $55.00* 166101 GLOVES 517603 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 7695 . 05/20/96 $134.40 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS < *> $134.40* 166102 05/20/96 $776.25 VISU -SEWER CLEAN & SEAL TV SANITARY SEWER 10564 SEWER TREATMEN CONTR REPAIRS P7739 *� $776.25* 166103 05/20/96 $600.00 WALLAKE, JAN AC INSTRUCTOR 051496 ART CENTER ADM,PROF SERVICES <*> $600.00* 166104 05/20/96 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICE MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES <*> $100.00* 166105 05/20/96 $439.11 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO SAFETY VESTS 6553 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7013 05/20/96 $150.00 WARNING LITES OF MINNES0 SAFETY VESTS 6553 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 7013 05/20/96 $150.00 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO SAFETY VESTS 6553 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 7013 *� $739.11* 166106 05/20/96 $130.58 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 050696 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 05/20/96 $129.75 WATERSTREET, JOAt1 MEETING EXPENSE 050696 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS 05/20/96 $41.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 050696 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 05/20/96 $9.99 WATERSTREET, JOAN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 050696 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW $8.78 WATERSTREET, JOAN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 050696 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 05/20/96 05/20/96 $$8.13 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 050696 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 05/20/96 $29.76 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 050696 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 05/20/96 $16.45 WATERSTREET, JOAN PRISONER MEALS 050696 POLICE DEPT. G PRISONER MEALS *� $450.44* 166107 05/20/96 $245.24 WEIGLE, SUE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 050396 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE <*> $245.24* 166108 05/20/96 $213.55 WEST PHOTO PHOTOGRAPHIC 22010 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES 7819 <*> $213.55* 166109 05/20/96 $259.54 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. PIPE 96242616 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 7550 05/20/96 $495.61 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE 96242918 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 7458 05/20/96 $233.85 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILL BIT 96243318 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7724 *� $989.00* 166110 05/20/96 $14.55 WESTLINK PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 050196 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 7934 <*> $14.55* 166111 05/20/96 $212.05 WILLIAMS STEEL RUST OLEUM SPRAY PAIN 67590101 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 7516 <*> $212.05* 166112 05/20/96 $1,582.20 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO COST.OF GOODS - PRO S 1211720 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5623 05/20/96 $153.60 WILSON SPORTING GOODS.CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1211721 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 5623 *� $1,735.80* • COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE --------------- _ PROGRAM - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM - 166113 ------------------- 05/20/96 $285.40 - -_ - - -- -------- WINE COMPANY, THE - - - - -- COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4340 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $349.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4341 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $754.04 WINE COMPANY, THE. COST OF -GOODS SOLD WI 4342 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $196.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4535 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $271.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4536 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,856.29* 166114 05/20/96 $251.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 14585 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE *> $251.00* 166115 05/20/96 $20.00 WOERMEN, JAMES A. SHIRT RETURNED FOR .PR 05.1496. GOLF PROG PRO SHOP SALES < *> $20.00* 166116 05/20/96 $159.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 51894 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $397.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 51895 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $324.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 51896 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $677.95 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 52040 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $454.95 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 52041 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/20/96 $295.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 52042 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,307.90* 166117 05/20/96 $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY POLICE SERVICE MAY 1996 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 166118 05/20/96 $885.31 XEROX CORPORATION MAINT 51076004 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL < *> $885.31* 166119 05/20/96 $15.67 ZAHL EQUIPMENT CO. GAS NOZZLE 0056724 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 7850 < *> $15.67* 166120 05/20/96 $30.00 ZALASKY, JONI REFUND COACH PITCH 051396 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $30.00* 166121 05/20/96 $2,005.29 ZIEGLER INC REPAIRS FM547063 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 7517 05/20/96 $2,944.66 ZIEGLER INC FUEL PUMP POOC2404 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7330 05/20/96 - $1,846.00 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS POOR2417 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7330 < *> $3,103.95* 166122 05/20/96 $120.00 ZINN, BOBO AC INSTRUCTOR 051496 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/20/96 $108.25 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 051496 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $228.25* $992,100.49* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, MAY 15, 1996, 7:40 PM page 1 FUND ----------------------------------------- # 10 GENERAL FUND $288,103.84 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $7,117.58 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $1 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $ 5,062.24 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $2,773.63 FUND # -27 GOLF COURSE FUND $83,789.81 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $13',070.68 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $265058.85 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $318,232.83 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $632.30 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $40,098.07 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $157,744.77 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $30 $992,100.49* t COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:54 PM page 1 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161378 04/05/96 $331,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 040599 LIQUOR FROG CASH 04/05/96 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 040596 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 161379 04/05/96 $504.00 POSTMASTER PRO SHOP ADVERTISING 040596 PRO SHOP PRO SVC.AUDIT < *> $504.00* 161380 04/12/96 $1,500.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE CHANGE FU 041096 GOLF FROG CHANGE FUND < *> $1,500.00* 161381. 04/19/96 $257,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 041996 LIQUOR PROG CASH 04/19/96 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 041996 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 164794 04/08/96 $256.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 040896 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $256,.00* 164795 04/08/96 $23,611.04 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 040896 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $23,611.04* 164796 04/08/96 $31,484.61 PERA PERA 4896 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $31,484.61 *, 164797 04/08/96 $19.62 PERA PERA 040896 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 164798 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380224 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380225 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380226 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 - $22.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 380754 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $1,963.06 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 380890 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 $20.30 QUALITY WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 380890 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/08/96 $106.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 38089000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $2,737.08 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381186 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 $52.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 381186CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $1,708.57 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381889 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 - $18.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381300 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 $1,926.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381523 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $4,356.19 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381524 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $1,282.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381579 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $96.03 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381616 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $15,410.60* 165181 04/15/96 $30.00 BERTRAND, JULIA CHANGE FUND /VANVALKEN 041096 WORK. CAP. PRO CHANGE FUND < *> $30.00* 165182 04/15/96 $315.29 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381934 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD LIQU GD WINE 04/15/96 $1,751.67 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI BE 382784 382784CO YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/15/96 04/.15/96 $87.50 $726.26 QUALITY QUALITY WINE WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD WI 382991 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/15/96 $995.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 383020 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/15/96 $1,005.85 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 383353 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD LIQU GD LIQU 04/15/96 $3,392.38 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD LI LI 383360 383408 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/15/96 $3,720.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF < *> $11,994.81* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:54 PM CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 165186 04/22/96 $23,494.38 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL PAYABLE 41996 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $23,494.38* 165187 04/22/96 $274.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF DNR PERMITS 42296 < *> $274.00* 165188 04/22/96 $31,210.56 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 0419 < *> $31,210.56* 165189 04/22/96 $19.62 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 0422 < *> $19.62* 165190 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 165194 04/30/96 165195 165742 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/3.0/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 - $11.62 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 383988 - $10.55 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384405 $1,063.70 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384556 $991.51 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384557 $602.36 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384571 $178.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384867 $1,410.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385193 $2,937.76. QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385205 $2;705.18 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385234 -$9.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385557 $9,857.48* $780.00 POSTMASTER $780.00* $1,255.63 $427.03 $213.51 $1,527.30 $71.85 $906.83 $23.95 $2,030.36 $3,069.18 $1,070.05 $2,565.83 $13,161..52* $36.25 $1,614.64 $979.48 $1,529.33 $36.00 $935.76 $2,670.45 $1,359.49 $59.90 $179.68 $9,400.98* $173,009.22* QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU Bulk mailing /Art Cent 043096 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385581 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385583 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385584 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386610 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 38661000 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386611 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 386611CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386811 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387311 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387312 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387317 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385047 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388503 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388504 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388555 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 389328 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389372 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389373 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389374 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 389423 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 389424 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK.SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE page 2 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:55 PM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $110,619.83 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $304.00 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $256.00 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $2,004.00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $59,825.39 $173,009.22' COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:54 PM page 1 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 161378 ---- 04/05/96 $331,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 040599 LIQUOR FROG CASH 04/05/96 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 040596 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 161379 04/05/96 $504.00 POSTMASTER PRO SHOP ADVERTISING 040596 PRO SHOP PRO SVC AUDIT < +> $504.00* 161380 04/12/96 $1,500.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE CHANGE FU 041096 GOLF'PROG CHANGE FUND < *> $1,500.00* 161381 64/19/96 $257,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 041996 LIQUOR FROG CASH 04/19/96 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 041996 LIQUOR PROG CASH . < *> $0.00* 164794 04/08/96 $256.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 040896 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $256.00* 164795 .04/08/96 $23,611.04 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 040896 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $23,611.04* 164796 04/08/96 $31,484.61 PERA PERA 4896 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $31,484.61* 164797 04/08/96 $19.62 PERA PERA 040896 GENERAL_ FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 164798 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380224 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST-OF GOODS SOLD LI 380225 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 $400.66 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380226 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/08/96 - $22.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 380754 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $1,963.06 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 380890 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 $20.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 380890 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/08/96 $106.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 38089000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $2,737.08 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381186 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96. 1 $52.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.381186C0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/08/96 $1,708.57 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381889 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/08/96 - $18.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381300 VERNON SELLING CST OF. GD WINE 04/08/96 $1,926.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381523 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU $4,356.19 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381524 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU .04/08/96 04/08/96 $1,282.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381579 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LI,QU 04/08/96 $96.03 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 381616 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $15,410:60* 165181 04/15/96 $30.00 BERTRAND, JULIA CHANGE FUND /VANVALKEN 041096 WORK. CAP. PRO CHANGE FUND < *> $30.00* 165182 04/15/96 $315.29 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 381934 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU WINE 04/15/96 $1,751.67 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 382784 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GDS BEE 04/15/96 $87.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 382784CO YORK SELLING ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/15/96 $726.26 QUALITY WINE COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 382991 383020 50TH VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/15/96 04/15/96 $995.75 $1,005.85 QUALITY QUALITY WINE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 383353 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/15/96 $3,392.38 QUALITY WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 383360 YORK SELLING CST OF OF GD LIQU GD LIQU 04/15/96 $3,720.11 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 383408 VERNON SELLING CST < *> $11,994.81* COUNCIL CHECn REGISTER THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:54 PM page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE . PROGRAM OBJECT -- PO NUM. ----------------------------------------- ----- --------- ----------- -- - --- --- - - - - -- - 165186 04/22/96 $23,494.38 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL PAYABLE 41996 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $23,494.38* 165187 04/22/96 $274.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF DNR PERMITS 42296 < *> $274.00* 165188 04/22/96 $31,210.56 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 0419 < *> $31,210.56* 165189 04/22/96 $19.62 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 0422 < *> $19.62 *. 165190 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 04/22/96 165194 04/30/96 165195 165742 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 04/30/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 05/06/96 - $11.62 - $10.55 $1,063.70 $991.51 $602.36 $178.20 $1,410.84 $2,937.76 $2;705.18 -$9.90 $9,857.43" QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE $780.0"? POSTMASTER $780.UO* $1,255.63 $427.03 $213.51 $1,527.30 $71.85- $906.83 $23.95 $2,030.36 $3,069.18 $1,070.05 $2,565.83 $13,161.52* $36.25 $1,614.64. $979.48 $1,,529.33 $36.00 $935.76 $2,670.45 $1,359.49 $59.90 $179.68 $9,400.98* $173,009.22* QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST-OF GOODS SOLD WI.383988 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384405 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384556 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384557 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 384571 COST OF GOODS SOLD. WI 384867 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385193 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385205 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385234 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385557 Bulk mailing /Art Cent 043096 AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385581 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385583 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385584 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386610 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 38661000 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386611 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 386611CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 386811 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387311 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387312 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 387317 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 385047 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388503 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388504 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 388555 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI "389328 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389372 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389373 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 389374 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 389423 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 389424 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR.HAND CHECKS THU, MAY 9, 1996, 6:55 PM page -------------------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $110,619.83 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $304.00 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $256.00 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $2,004.00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $59,825.39 $173,009.22* MEMORANDUM DATE: May 20, 1996 -- TO: Edina City Council FROM: David Velde SUBJECT: Lyme Disease and Deer In Minnesota, deer tick are predominantly found north and east of the Mississippi River. Not all deer tick carry the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease. The deer tick get the bacteria from white - footed mice and other small rodents and may transmit the bacteria when they attach and feed on man or other animals. The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District has been routinely collecting and analyzing deer tick as part of their on -going monitoring program. As of this date, the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease has not been detected in deer tick sampled in southern Hennepin County. It is highly unlikely that a resident in Edina would be exposed to tickborne Lyme disease as a result of working or playing outdoors in their back yard. Even if they were exposed to deer tick carrying the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease, transmission can be prevented by checking for ticks after being outdoors and removing any attached ticks within 24 hours. It is impossible to expect that this illness could be prevented by eliminating all possible host animals, including mice. I will be attending a half day workshop on May 28, 1996 which will address Lyme disease and other tickborne illnesses in more detail. Meanwhile, the attached brochure covers the subject quite well. Check and recheck for ticks when you are in tick - infested areas. These actions can reduce your Chances of getting a tick-borne disease. • When in deer tick habitat, walk in the center of the trail to avoid picking up ticks from grass and brush. • Wear light - colored clothes so ticks are visible. • Create a barrier to ticks by tucking pants into socks or boots and tuck long - sleeved shirt into pants. • If you use an insect repellent, carefully follow directions on container. • After being outdoors in tick habitat, do a complete body check, shower and vigorously towel dry. • Take precautions when in tick habitat, but don't panic if you find a deer tick on you. Check the hair of children, especial- ly the hairline and behind the ears. Check your dog ° or cat for ticks before allowing the animal inside your home. The risk of getting a tick -borne disease is small if the tick is removed soon after it becomes attached. • Use tweezers to grasp the tick close to its mouth. • Gently and S- L- O -W -L -Y pull the tick outward. • To avoid contact with the bacteria, if present, do not squeeze the tick's body. • Apply an antiseptic to the bite. • Watch for early signs and symptoms of Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis and babesiosis. Do you live, work or play in an area that has deer ticks? •> v 1994 Reported Cases of Lyme Disease in Minnesota byy County of Exposure (n =208) ❑o ❑ 1.3 ❑ J -6 ■ over 6 WI =52 Other MN or WI = 5 Unknown = 26 Ith Deer ticks are found primarily in counties north and east of the Mississippi River in Minnesota, and throughout western Wisconsin. In the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, deer ticks are frequently found in Washington, northern Ramsey and Anoka counties. For more information about: Signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis and babesiosis, call the Minnesota Department of Health at (612) 623 - 5414. Deer ticks and camping, hiking and recreational areas, call the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources at (612) 296 -6157 (Metro area) or 1 -800- 766 -6000. Deer ticks in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, call the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District at (612) 645 -9149. Minnesota Department of Health Disease Prevention and Control 717 Delaware Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55440- 9441 This brochure om; funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Photographs reprinted with permission. IC4 141 -0516 MDH, 11 /95 k" Lyme disease is an illness that may affect the skin, joints, nervous system, heart, and other areas of the body. People of all ages can get Lyme disease, which is caused by the bacteria, Borrelia burgdorferi. The bacteria is transmitted to humans and some domestic animals by the bite of an infected deer tick. The deer tick — Ixodes scnpularis — is also called the . black - legged or bear tick. Recognizing the early signs and symptoms of Lyme disease is important. If you have One or more of these signs and symp- toms within 3 to 30 days after a tick bite, see your physician immediately. • A characteristic skin rash, called erythema migrans, has a "bull's eye" appearance — a red ring with a central clearing. Not everyone recognizes or gets the rash. Many people only have the rash without the other symptoms. • Fever and chills • Headache • Fatigue • Muscle and joint pain The rash begins as a small, raised red area that moy expand to several inches in diameter. It may appear on one- or more places on the body, may include one or more rash- es, and is usually not painful or itchy. Days or weeks later, the illness may progress and include one or more of the following signs and symptoms: • Multiple rashes • Facial paralysis on one yids • Fever, stiff neck, headache' • Weakness, numbness or pain in arms and legs • Irregular heart beat • Persistent malaise and fatigue If a person is not treated early in the disease, these late signs and symptoms may develop months or years after the tick bite: • Chronic arthritis in one or more joints, usually the knees, which may be swollen and painful • Neurologic impairment • Fatigue Early diagnosis and treatment can make a difference. The early stages of Lyme disease are more effectively treated with antibiotics. The diagnosis of Lyme disease is based on the signs and symptoms, presence of the rash, and a history of exposure to deer ticks. A blood test may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis. A diagnosis of Lyme disease can be difficult when a person does not have the rash. Lyme disease is treated with antibiotics. Treatment in the early stages can prevent later problems, such as arthritis. Treatment is also available for the later stages. Two diseases which appear to be less common than Lyme disease — human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and babesiosis — can also be transmitted by the deer tick. The signs and symptoms of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) can include: • Fever (over 102') • Severe headache • Chills and shaking rigors • Muscle aches Less frequent symptoms of ehrlichiosis include nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, weight loss, abdominal pain, cough, diarrhea, aching joints and change in mental status. Ehrlichiosis is treated with antibiotics. Babesiosis is a protozoan infection. Sign; and svmptonu+ include: • I ligh fever • Muscle aches • Chills • Fatigue • I Ieadache • Loss of appetile Symptom~ usually go away without treatment, but some cakes may be severe. Babesiosis is treated with antimicrobial drugs. See your physician if you suspect either of these diseases. Deer ticks search for a host from the tips of grasses and brush. Ticks get the bacteria from the white- footed mouse and other small rodents. An infected tick may feed on and transmit the bacteria to a human or an animal. The ticks shown below are the approximate size during different stages of its life. Larva The eggs hatch into tiny larva, which may become infected from the first meal. Nymph Most cases of Lyme disease are caused by the nymph, which looks like a freckle or speck of dirt. The nymph feeds from May through August. Adult male. and female The larger adult ticks feed in late fall and early spring, but are easier to see and remove: After feeding on deer, the female lays her eggs. Engorged tick This is the size of a fully engorged adult female deer tick. Wood ticks (also called dog ticks) are larger than deer ticks, have white markings on their back, and do not transmit Lyme disease. Not all people bitten by a deer tick will get a disease. Not all deer ticks carry the bacteria. However, if a deer tick is infected, it must be attached for at least 24 hours before it can transmit the bacteria. Enlarged stages of the deer tick appear next to an enlarged dime. Left: Nymph Center: Larva Right: Adult Female J&. -9awd' 0 of _1 - - ID on. Oc�DoOO K C O y ¢ �c 19i G O 0.0.0. m CD CD O O.� R Io H perD ^p� 'ID O��.`����tww ai h N_ rF _0. O ] ] r-h fn ID CL' 0 I� ID 7C �7 M vwi m O ° aq y n w v� O O c�D y w y, ] y w' IDOL 1 O 0 ID fD `D . f�D O .�+ O C CCD] yCD am bn" �' w 0. CD o CD m ] O cD ] y 00