HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-02-15_COUNCIL PACKETJOINT MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA BOARD OF EDUCATION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15,2000,5:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Presentation of Predesign Study by TSP and Anderson - Johnson
Assoc.
2. Summary of Park Board Recommendations
3. Discussion Issues
A. Project Scope
B. Ownership
C. Operating Responsibilities
D. Use of Facilities
E. Other
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 15, 2000
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items
marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and
will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a
Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from
the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of February 1, 2000
Rollcall II. 'PAYMENT OF CLAIMS- as per pre -list dated 2/9/2000, TOTAL: $28,392.42
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CONCERT BAND DAY
POLICE COMMENDATIONS
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of February 1, 2000
II. PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council
required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no
petition
Rollcall A. VERNON AVENUE & GLEASON ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-31
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass.
Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Rollcall A. FINAL REZONING Haugland Company Tracts A & B, RLS #1378, Hennepin County, Construct
Retail Building.
Rollcall B. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France. Avenue South, Building
Expansion And Parking Ramp Construction
Rollcall C. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PLAT Frauenshuh Companies, Northeastern Quadrant Of
Highway 169 & 494, Construct New Office Building
Wall D. CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT, Our Lady Of Grace, 5071 Eden Avenue, Building Expansion
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable
rollcall vote of majority of all Council members to pass.
Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2000 -4 First Reading, Amending Section 850 adding certain drive thrus
as accessory uses in PCD -1
Rollcall
Agenda /Edina City Council
February 15, 2000
Page 2
V. AWARD OF BID
A. Five Full Size Police Squad Cars, Police Interceptor Model Crown Victoria
B. 4 -Wheel Drive Dodge Dakota Pick Up Truck, Fire Department
C. Chevrolet 4 -Wheel Drive Astrovan, Fire Department
D. Recycling/Crushing of Concrete and Blacktop
E. Annual Uniform and Police Supplies
F. One Chevrolet Impala, Unmarked Squad, Police Department
G. Wooddale Park Playground Site Improvements
H. Annual Fertilizer Purchase for Braemar & Fred Richards Golf Courses
I. Four Greensmaster 3100 Greensmowers, Braemar Golf Course
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Report of 2/1/00
B. ANTENNA REQUEST - U.S. West - Co- location Civil Defense Tower Gleason & John
Harris Drive
C. Resolution - No Parking Anytime at T.H. 100 and West 77th Street Interchange
D. Confirm School District Reappointment to Human Relations Commission
E. Annual Bridge Certification Report
F. Resolution - Transportation Funding Bill/Policy
VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
XII. FINANCE
A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 2/9/2000 TOTAL: $561,788.15 and for
confirmation of Payment of Claims as per Pre -List Dated 2/1/2000 TOTAL: 116,701.08
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Mon
Feb 21
PRESIDENTS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Mon
Mar 6
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Mar 7
STATE CAUCUS NIGHT
Thur
Mar 16
Annual Meeting
5:00 P.M.
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
Tues
Mar 21
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER°
Tues
Apr 4
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
Tues
Apr 18
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Apr 25
Volunteer Recognition Reception
5:00 P.M.
EDINBOROUGH PARK
Tues
May 2
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
May 16
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 29
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Chair
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by
seconded by Commissioner Kelly approving
Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Commissioner Hovland and
the Edina Housing and
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JANUARY 18, 2000, APPROVED Motion
made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Kelly
approving the Minutes, of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for
January 18, 2000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Faust approving the check Register
dated January 27, 2000, and consisting of one page totaling $21,038.45.
Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the
meeting adjourned at 7:04 P.M.
Executive Director
COUNCIL
CHECK ISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13. page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13524
02/15/00-
$17,480.00
DORSEY &
WHITNEY LLP
Legal Fees
74 -8899
GRANDVIEW
PRO FEES LEG /S
02/15/00
$2,810.16
DORSEY &
WHITNEY LLP.
Legal Fees
74-8899
CENTENNIAL
LAK PRO FEES LEG /S
< *>
$20,290.16*-
13525
02/15/00
$7,942.26
FLANAGAN
SALES
Trash Cans for North
8898
CENTENNIAL
LAK PARKS 2085
< *>
$7,942.26*
13526
02/15/00
$160.00
URBAN LAND
INSTITUTE
U.L.I. Dues
011900
CENTENNIAL
LAK MISC
< *>
$160.00*
$28,392.42*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY
09 -FEB -2000 (13:45) page 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $28,392.42
$28,392.42*
11'A,
c r
0
iee8
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, the Edina High School Concert Band has rehearsed and
performed since the founding of Edina High School in 1949; and
WHEREAS, under the inspired leadership of its conductors - Butler, Eitel,
Melichar, Elledge and Webb —the Band has achieved a record of 46
consecutive years of "Superior" rating at the Minnesota State High School
League contests; and
WHEREAS, "Superior" is the highest achievable rating by a high school
band in the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, this year the. Band celebrates its 47th anniversary of POPS
Concerts which have entertained more than a quarter million people; and
WHEREAS, more than 3,800 of the Band's musicians have achieved local,
national and international acclaim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina by action
of its City Council does hereby proclaim February 24, 2000, to be:
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CONCERT BAND DAY
in 'the City of Edina, Minnesota.
MAYOR
Memo
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Mike Siitari
Date: 02/11/00
Re: Police Department Commendations
The Police Department would like to recognize a citizen and two officers for actions that have
earned department commendations. The awards are as follows:
Distinguished Service Award
Mr. Jonathon Miller, a Minneapolis resident, was at Southdale on January 4, 2000, when he
heard a woman yelling for help. The woman had been robbed of her purse and the suspect
was fleeing through the parking lot Mr. Miller chased the suspect, wrestled him to the ground
and held him until the police arrived. Mr. Miller's actions prevented the escape of .a
dangerous felon.
Departmental Commendation
Officers Brandon Deshler and Erik Amundson were working plainclothes commercial
enforcement in the Southdale area when they monitored an unknown problem call on
Cornelia Drive. The call escalated into a burglary in progress as both officers responded to
the location. As they pulled up to the house the suspect stole the victim's car and attempted
to elude the officers. The suspect abandoned the car when it was disabled during the
pursuit and a foot chase ensued. The suspect was eventually arrested without injury to any
citizen or officer. The suspect was charged with burglary, false imprisonment, auto theft and
fleeing the police. The officers' timely response resulted in the arrest of a career criminal
responsible for several other burglaries that same date.
• Page 1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 1, 2000 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Mayor Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and
seconded by Member Kelly approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF JANUARY 18, 2000, APPROVED Motion
made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Kelly approving the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of January 18, 2000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Hovland
and seconded by Member Kelly setting February 15, 2000, for the following planning
matters:
1. Final Rezoning for Haugland Company Tracts A & B, RLS #1378, Hennepin
County, Construct Retail Building,
2. Final Development Plan for Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue
South, Building Expansion and Parking Ramp Construction,
3. Preliminary Rezoning and Plat for Frauenshuh Companies, Northeastern
Quadrant of Highway 169 and 494, Construct New Office Building; and
4. Conditional Use Permit, Our Lady of Grace, 5071 Eden Avenue, Building
Expansion.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION 2000 -16 APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR 5548 -5550 MALIBU DRIVE
(JOHN PRINS) Member Hovland introduced the following resolution, seconded by
Member Kelly:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-16
APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR
5548 -5550 MALIBU DRIVE
WHEREAS, the following described tract of land, Lot 27, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS
3RD. ADDITION, is requested to be. divided into two tracts of land:
PARCEL A:
That part of Lot 27, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northeasterly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 27, Block 1; thence on
an assumed bearing of South 45 degrees, 58 minutes, 13 seconds West, along
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
the northwesterly line thereof, a distance of 64.86 feet to the point of
beginning of the line to be described; thence South 43 degrees 34 minutes 35
seconds East a distance of 146.95 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 27,
said line being the northwesterly right -of -way line of Malibu Drive, and said
line there terminating.
PARCEL B.
That part of Lot 27, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southwesterly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 27, Block 1; thence on an
assumed bearing of South 45 degrees 58 minutes 13 seconds West, along the
northwesterly line thereof, a distance of 64.86 feet to the point of beginning
of the line to be described; thence South 43 degrees, 34 minutes, 35 seconds
East a distance of 146.95 feet to the East line of said Lot 27, said line being the
northwesterly right of way line of Malibu -Drive, and said line there
terminating.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of. land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections. 850 and 810 are
hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land, but
only to the extent permitted under Code section 810 and Code Section 850 and subject to
the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said ordinances are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless. made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Dated this 1st day of February, 2000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION 2000 -17 APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR 5544 -5546 MALIBU DRIVE
(JOHN PRINS) Member Hovland introduced the following resolution, seconded by
Member Kelly:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-17
APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR
5544 AND 5546 MALIBU DRIVE
WHEREAS, the following described tract of land, Lot 26, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS
3RD ADDITION, is requested to be divided into two tracts of land:
PARCEL A:
Page 2
J
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
That part of Lot 26, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 26, Block 1; thence on an
assumed bearing of South 8 degrees, 13 minutes, 15 seconds West, along the
West line thereof, a distance of 56.00 feet to the .point of beginning of the line
to be described; thence South 82 degrees, 36 minutes, 52 seconds East a
distance of 127.83 feet to the East line of said Lot 26, said line being the
westerly right of way line of Malibu Drive, and said line there terminating.
PARCEL B:
That part of Lot 26, Block'l, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 26, Block 1; thence on an
assumed bearing of South 8 degrees, 13 minutes, 15 seconds West, along the
West line thereof, a distance of 56.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line
to be described; thence South 82 degrees, .36 minutes, 52 seconds East a
distance of 127.63 feet to the East line of said Lot 26, said lire being the
westerly right of way line of Malibu Drive, and said line there terminating.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are
hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land, but
only to the extent permitted under Code section 810 and Code Section 850 and subject to
the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said ordinances are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject,, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless mae in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Dated this 1s' day of February, 2000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
ORDINANCE NO 2000 -1 ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE REPLACING SECTION 1340
WITH SECTION 1341 - PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS
Chief Siitari noted that Council expressed concern over a potential inability to verify the
revenues of businesses requesting an exemption from licensing when they granted first
reading to the ordinance amendment eliminating individual licenses for massage therapists.
He said language had been added that staff believes adequately addresses their concern. The
new language allows the City to require a certification from a Certified Public Accountant
thus corroborating the validity of exemption requests.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
Member Hovland made a motion granting second reading to Ordinance No. 2000 -1 as
follows:
EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2000-1
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 1340 OF THE CITY CODE
AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW SECTION 1341 PHYSICAL CULTURE AND
HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 1340 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. The City Code is amended by adding a new Section 1341 as follows:
Section 1341- Physical Culture and Health Services and Clubs
1341.01 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise clearly indicates, the following terms
shall have the stated meanings:
Escort Service. - Any business which provides male or female accompaniment
services to its customers for a fee or other valuable consideration.
Massage. The rubbing, pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping, rolling, pounding,
vibrating, or stimulating the superficial parts of the human body with the hands or
any instrument by a person who is not duly licensed by the State to practice
medicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry.
"Physical Culture and Health Services," "Physical Culture and Health Club,"
"Reducing Club," "Reducing Salon," "Massage Parlor." Any building, room,
structure, place, or establishment used by the public other than a hospital,
sanitarium, rest home, nursing home, boarding home or other institution for the
hospitalization or care of human beings, duly licensed under the provisions of M.S.
144.50 through 144.703, inclusive, where non - medical and non - surgical manipulative
exercises or massages are practiced upon the human body for a fee or other valuable
consideration by anyone not duly licensed by the State to practice medicine,
surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic; physical therapy or podiatry, with or without the
use of mechanical, therapeutic, or bathing devices.
Sauna Parlor. An establishment or business the principal use of which is the
provision of a room or rooms used by the public for bathing, relaxing or reducing
purposes utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent.
1341.02 Business License Required.
Subd.1 Limiting Business Licenses. It is found and determined that the type of
business activity subject to being licensed under this Section is particularly subject
to abuse which may take a number of forms contrary to. the morals, health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Further, it is found that control of these
abuses requires intensive efforts of the Police Department. as well as other
departments of the City. These efforts exceed those required to. control and regulate
other business activities licensed by the City. This concentrated use of City services
tends to detract from and reduce the level of service available to the rest of the
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
community and thereby diminishes the ability of the City to promote the general
health, welfare, morals and safety of the community. Therefore, the number of
business licenses which may be in force under this Section at any, one time shall not
exceed four.
Subd. 2 Requiring License and Defining Businesses Operating within City. No
person, partnership, corporation, or other organization shall operate a physical
culture and health service or club, reducing club or salon, sauna parlor, massage
parlor, or escort service within the City, either exclusively or in connection with any
other operation or enterprise, unless such business is currently licensed under this
Section. A business is operating within the City, regardless of whether the business
premises are actually located within the corporate limits of the City, if the business
premises serve as a.point of assignment for employees who perform escort services
within the corporate limits of the City, including, but not limited to, telephone
referral business.
Subd. 3 Certain Businesses Exempt.
A. The preceding provisions of this Section notwithstanding, no business
license shall be required for a business establishment which offers massage as
an accessory use if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by
affidavits and other documents submitted to and in form and substance
reasonably acceptable to the Clerk:
1. The principal activity of the business shall not be a massage parlor, sauna
parlor, or escort service.
2. The annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage is less
than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by
financial statements or an affidavit signed by the authorized Officer of the
business. In lieu of delivery of the aforementioned affidavit, at the direction of
the City, the business shall be required to deliver, a certification from a certified
public accountant, acceptable to the Manager, that the annual gross revenue
from massage services, for the preceding twelve months, is less that 25% of its
total annual gross revenue for such period of time.
3. The room or rooms where massage is performed shall not have an exclusive
entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building in which the principal
business is-located or to a public concourse or public lobby. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, massage may be performed by an individual at the residence of
the person receiving the massage.
4. All fees or other consideration derived from performing massage shall be
received by and accounted for by the proprietor of the principal business.
5. All individuals performing massage in connection with the business shall be
employees of the principal business or shall be independent contractors or
agents who perform massage pursuant to a written agreement with the owner of
the principal business.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council(February 1, 2000
B. Any business that requests an exemption from the business license
requirement shall submit the required affidavits and documents on an annual
basis. The exemption request shall be due on or before the first day of June of
each year.
1341.03 License Application and Procedures. Every application for a license under this
Section shall be made on a form supplied by the Clerk and shall be filed with the Clerk.
The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this
Section and to the holders of such licenses. In addition to the information required by
Section 160 of this Code, the application for a license under this Section shall . contain the
following information. Failure to complete or supply such information may cause a
license to be denied.
A. Whether the applicant is a natural person, a partnership, a corporation, or
other form of organization.
B. If the applicant is a natural person:
1. The true name, place and date of birth, current address and
telephone number of the applicant.
2. Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name
other than the applicant's true name; and if so, such name or names
and information concerning dates and places where used.
3. A specific statement as to the type and nature of the business to be
licensed.
4. The name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a name
other than the full individual name of the applicant, in which case a
certified copy of the certification required by M.S. Chapter 333, shall
be attached to the application.
5. The addresses at which the applicant has lived during the previous
five years, including a statement of how long the applicant has been
continuously a resident of the State during the period as of and
immediately preceding the date of application.
6. The kind, name and location of every business or occupation in
which the applicant has been engaged during the preceding five years.
7. The names and addresses of the applicant's employer(s) and
partner(s), if any, who were such at any time during the preceding five
years.
8. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime,
or violation of any provisions of this Code or State Law other than
traffic violations and, if so, information as to the time, place,: and
offense for which convictions were had.
C. If the applicant is a partnership:
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
1. The. names and addresses of all partners and all information
concerning each partner as is required of an applicant under paragraph
B. of this Subsection.
2. The names(s) of the managing partner(s), and the interest of each
partner in the business.
3. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with
the application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to
trade name under the provisions of M.S. Chapter 333, a certified copy
of such certification shall also be attached.
D. If the applicant is a corporation or other organization.
1. The name of the applicant, and if incorporated, the state of
incorporation.
2. A true Certificate of Good Standing, dated as of a current date, and
true copies of the Articles of Incorporation or Association Agreement
and Bylaws shall be attached to the application. If a foreign
corporation, a Certificate of Authority issued pursuant to M.S. Chapter
303, shall also be attached.
3. The name of the person(s) who is to manage the business and all
information concerning the person(s) as is required of an applicant
under paragraph B. of this Subsection.
4. The names of all officers, directors and persons who control or own
an interest in excess of 5% in such corporation or organization and all
information concerning the persons as is required of an applicant
under paragraph B. of this Subsection.
E. The location of the business premises.
F. Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities or has had a
license revoked, or has been denied a license, to conduct any of the activities
required to be licensed hereunder; and if so, when and where the applicant is
or was so licensed, has had a license revoked or has been denied a license.
G. The names and addresses of those individuals to be employed by the
applicant and who may work within the City.
H. The names, residences and business addresses of three residents of the
County, not related to the applicant or financially interested in the business
to be licensed, who may be referred to by the City for information as to the
applicant's character. If the applicant is a partnership, three such names shall
be supplied for each partner, and if the applicant is a corporation or other
organization, three such names shall be supplied for each officer of the
applicant and each manager of the business.
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
I. The amount of capital investment to be made by the applicant in the
premises described in the application to operate the business to be licensed.
Capital investment shall mean the amount of money that the applicant
actually invests to acquire, refurbish, repair, remodel, or furnish the
premises, including moneys invested to comply with Subsection 1341.14.
This paragraph shall not apply to any applicant for a license to operate only
an escort service.
J. A financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an
independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be
licensed for the last three fiscal years of such business, or shorter period of
time that the applicant may have been in the business to be licensed,
itemized as to each activity of the business including, without limitation, the
gross income from performing massage.
1341.04 Execution of Application. All applications for any license under this Section
shall be signed and verified by the oath of the applicant. If the application is that of a
natural person, it shall be signed and verified by such person; if by a partnership, by all
the partners; if by a corporation, by two of its officers, and if by an unincorporated
association, by its manager or managing officer. Any falsification of information on any
license application shall result in the denial of the license applied for, and shall constitute
adequate grounds for the suspension or revocation of any license issued to the applicant.
1341.05 License and Investigation Fees.
Subd.1 License Fee. Each application for a license or renewal license shall be
accompanied by payment in full of the required license fee. The fee for a business
license shall be as set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Upon rejection of any
application for a license, the Clerk shall refund the amount paid.
Subd. 2 Investigation Fee. At the time of each original application for a business
license, the applicant shall deposit an investigation fee as set forth in Section 185 of
this Code. The cost of the investigation will be based on the expense involved. All
deposit monies not expended 'on the investigation. will be refunded to the applicant.
1341.06 Investigation. All applications shall be referred by the Clerk to the Police
Department and to such other City departments for investigation of the applicant's
character and verification of the facts set forth in the application. Within 60 days after the
application date, the Police Chief and any other consultants shall submit a written
recommendation to the Manager as to issuance or non - issuance of the license, setting forth
the facts upon which the recommendation is based.
1341.07 Approval or Denial of Application. Within 90 days after the application date,
the Manager shall either approve or deny the application and shall notify the Clerk in
writing of the decision. If the application is approved, the Clerk shall issue the license. If
the application is denied, the Clerk shall furnish written notice of the denial to the
applicant, together with the reason or reasons for denial. In, addition to the reasons set
forth in Subsection 160.03 of this Code a license may also be denied for any of the
following reasons:
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
Subd.1 Under Legal Age. if an individual applicant is under the age of 18.
Subd.2 Convictions. If the applicant, or any officers, managers, directors,
shareholders or owners, if a corporation or association, or any partners, if a
partnership, has been convicted .of a felony, or has been convicted of any illegal
conduct involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation:
Subd.3 Conviction without Sufficient Rehabilitation. If the applicant, or any
principal officers, managers, directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or
association, or any partners, if a partnership, has been convicted of any crime or.
crimes directly relating to the occupation of massage and escort services, as
provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not shown competent evidence of
sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties of the occupation
of massage or escort services, as provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 3.
Subd.4 Prior Denial of License. If the applicant, or any principal officers,
managers, directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or association, or any
partners, if a partnership, has within one year prior to the date of application been
denied a license under this Section, or any similar ordinance of any municipality
within the State, or within the period has had revoked any license issued under this
Section, or any. similar ordinance of any municipality within the State.
Subd. 5 Zoning Restriction. If the business to be licensed is not permitted by
Section 850 of this Code upon the premises described in the application.
Subd. 6 Failure to Meet Construction Requirements. If the premises described in
the application for a business license fail to comply with the requirements of
Subsection 1341.14.
Subd. 7 Capital Investment Less than $10,000. If the applicant's planned capital
investment in the premises described in the application to operate the business to
be licensed is less than $10,000. This paragraph shall not apply to any license
application to operate only an escort service.
1341.08 Renewal Application. Not less than 30 nor more than 60 days before the
expiration of any license issued pursuant to this Section, any license holder desiring to
renew the license shall submit a written application to the Clerk on forms provided by the
City together with payment in full of the license fee as required for the original license.
The renewal application shall be forwarded to the Manager who shall, within 30 days after
the renewal application date, either approve or deny the application and shall notify the
Clerk in writing of the decision. The Clerk shall then issue the license or, in case of
denial, notify the applicant in writing of the denial setting forth the reason or reasons
therefor.
1341.09 Appeal to Council. Any applicant may appeal the denial of a license or a license
renewal by filing a written notice of appeal to the Council in the Clerk's office within 10
days after the denial. The Council shall hear the appeal within 60 days after the notice is
filed, and opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard in favor of or opposing the
issuance or renewal of the license. The Council may order and conduct such additional
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
investigation as it deems necessary. Any licensee is authorized to continue to operate until
final action by the Council upon licensee's renewal application, unless prohibited by
Council resolution made after the denial.
1341.10 . License Not Transferable; Duration. Each license shall be issued to the
applicant only and shall not be transferable to another holder. Any change in the persons
named as partners on the application, as required by paragraph CA of Subsection 1341.03
and any change in the persons who are named in the application as required by paragraph
DA of Subsection 1341.03 shall be deemed a transfer for purposes of this Section. If the
licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of less than 25%
cumulatively over the license period shall not be deemed a transfer. The change in or
addition of a vice - president, secretary, or treasurer of a corporate licensee shall not be
deemed a transfer. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be effective from July
1 through June 30.
1341.11 Suspension or Revocation of License. The Council may suspend for any period
not exceeding 60 days, or revoke, any license issued pursuant to this Section upon finding
a violation of any provision of this Section or upon violation of any other provision of this
Code or State Law or regulation affecting the activities covered by this Section. Any
conviction for prostitution or any other crime or violation involving moral turpitude shall
result in the revocation of any license issued under this Section. Except in the case of a
suspension pending a hearing on revocation, revocation or suspension by the Council
shall be preceded by written notice to the licensee of a hearing. The notice may be served
upon the licensee personally or by mailing it to the business or residence address set forth
in the application or on file with the Clerk. The notice shall give at least ten days notice of
the time and place of the hearing and shall state the nature of the charges against the
licensee. The. Council may, without notice, suspend any license pending a hearing on
revocation for a period not exceeding 30 days.
1341.12 Hours o' f Operation. No business licensed under this Section shall be open for
business, nor shall any persons or customers be permitted on the premises, between the
hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M.
1341.13
Subd.1 Notice of Change in Management. The individual designated by a
partnership or a corporation in its business license application to be manager and in
responsible charge of the business shall remain responsible for the conduct of the
business until another suitable person has been designated in writing by the license
holder. The license holder shall promptly give the Police Department written
notice of any such change indicating the name and address of the new manager and
the effective date of the change.
Subd.2 Clothing Requirements. Employees of businesses licensed under this
section shall be and shall remain fully clothed while performing massage.
Subd.3 Location of Services. No person shall perform a massage for a fee or
other consideration at any place other than (i) a physical culture and health service,
physical culture or health club, reducing salon, sauna parlor, or massage parlor that
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City council/February 1, 2000
has been duly licensed pursuant to' Subd. 2 of Subsection 1341.02, (ii) a business
which is exempt from a business license pursuant to Subd. 3 of Subsection 1341.02,
or (iii) the residence of the person receiving the massage.
Subd. 4 No Services Allowed by Sexually Oriented Businesses. No person shall
perform a massage for a fee or other consideration in connection with a Sexually
Oriented Business as defined by Subsection 850.03 of this Code.
1341.14 Construction Requirements. No business license shall be issued under this
Section for other than an escort service unless the premises used for the operation shall
comply with the following requirements:
Subd.1 Requirements for Steam or Hot Air Rooms. All rooms utilizing steam or
hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent, and all restrooms, changing rooms
and bathrooms used in connection with such rooms, shall be constructed with
materials impervious to moisture, bacteria, mold and fungus growth. Floor -to -wall
and wall -to -wall joints shall be constructed so as to provide a sanitary cove with a
minimum radius of 3/8 inch.
Subd. 2 Public Restroom Requirements. All public restrooms shall be provided
with mechanical ventilation with 2 cfm (cubic feet per minute) per square foot area,
a minimum of 15 foot candles of illumination, a hand washing sink equipped with
hot and cold running water under pressure, sanitary towels with dispensers and
soap with dispensers.
Subd.3 Requirements for Janitor's Closet. Each such operation shall have a
janitor's closet for the storage of cleaning supplies with a mop sink, mechanical
ventilation with 2 cfm per square foot. area and a minimum of 15 footcandles of
illumination.
Subd. 4 Lockers. Individual lockers shall be provided for use by customers and
shall have separate keys for locking.
1341.15 Maintenance; Sanitary Conditions; Communicable Disease.
Subd.1 Clean and Sanitary Business. All businesses licensed under this Section
at all times shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
Subd.2 Clean and Sanitary Instruments. All instruments and mechanical,
therapeutic, and bathing devices or parts that come into contact with the human
body at all times shall be kept clean and sanitary.
Subd.3 Towels and Linens. No towels and linens furnished for use by one
patron shall be furnished for use by another until thoroughly laundered.
Subd. 4 Hand Washing. All individuals who practice massage shall wash their
hands before each massage.
Subd.5 Communicable Disease. No person suffering from a communicable
disease shall work or be employed in a licensed business. No person suffering
Page 11
Minutes/Edina Cif Council/February 1, 2000
from a communicable disease to the Knowledge of the owner, custodian, or
employees of a licensed business shall be accommodated as a patron.
1341.16 Inspection. Each business required to be licensed shall at all times be held open
for inspection by duly authorized representatives of the City.
1341.17 Barber Shops and Beauty Salons Exempted. Barber shops and beauty salons
which do not give, or hold themselves out to give, massages, other than are customarily
given in such shops and salons for the purpose of facial beautification only shall not be
subject to the provisions of this Section.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
publication.
Adopted this 1st of February, 2000.
Attest
City Clerk Mayor
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Ordinance No. 2000 -1 adopted.
ORDINANCE NO 2000 -02, ADOPTED WITH WAIVER OF SECOND READING,
AMENDING SECTION 140 - HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Manager Hughes
explained the proposed ordinance was needed to bring the City's Code into compliance with
Minnesota Statutes. He added the -Human Relations Commission has reviewed the proposed
ordinance and recommends the Council adopt the amendment.
Member Hovland introduced the following Ordinance, and moved its adoption waiving
second reading.
EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2000-2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 140 OF THE EDINA
CITY CODE BY INCLUDING "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" AS
A DISCRIMINATORY ISSUE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph B of Subsection 140.01 of the Edina City Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"B. Secure for all of the residents of the City freedom from discrimination because
of-race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation or national origin in
connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations,
public services and education."
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
publication.
Adopted this 1st of February, 2000.
Attest:
City Clerk
Page 12
Mayor
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes; Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Ordinance No. 2000 -2 adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2000 -03 ADOPTED AMENDING SECTION 460 - SIGN
REGULATIONS Planner Larsen explained that the proposed amendment to the City's code
would • amend the sign regulations. He noted that staff believes the regulations relative to
churches, schools, golf courses and public buildings may be more restrictive than necessary.
Current regulations allow one sign of not more than 24 square feet. This necessitates several
entities to request temporary signs. Mr. Larsen stated the proposed amendment to the sign
regulations should allow for better communication and reduce the number of temporary sign
requests.
Mr. Larsen explained the second portion of the amendment dealt with the definition of a
clear view. He noted that the current definition is ambiguous whether it can be allied to any
intersection of a driveway and street. The new definition clarifies the applicability.
Following a brief , discussion Member Kelly introduced the following Ordinance, and
moved its adoption waiving second reading:
EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2000-3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460 OF THE CITY CODE
TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS FOR CHURCHES, SCHOOLS,
GOLF COURSES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES; AND TO REVISE
THE DEFINITION AND REGULATIONS FOR THE CLEAR VIEW ZONE
THE CITY OF THE CITY OF EDINA.ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subd. 1 of Subsection 460.05 of the City Code is amended by adding the
following regulations:
Type
Building Identification
(churches, schools, golf
courses, public facilities
only)
Maximum Number Maximum Maximum
Area Height
Wall: 1 Per Building 24 sq. ft. N/A
Freestanding: 1 Per Frontage' 36 sq. ft. 8 ft.
Section 2. Subd. 2 of Subsection 460.02 of the City Code is amended by revising the
following definition:
Clear View Zone. A triangle formed by connecting the three following points: the point
of intersection of the extensions of the curb lines or edge of the traveled portion of each
street or drive aisle, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of
intersection.
Section 3. Subd. 3, D. of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended by revising the
following regulation:
Page 13
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
D. No sign shall be erected or placed in the clear view zone. Provided, however, that, a
freestanding sign may be erected if:
1. At least ten feet of clearance is maintained between the ground and the
bottom of the sign and the sign is supported by a single pylon of 12 inches or less
in diameter,
2. The sign and all supporting materials do not exceed three feet in height as
measured from the highest point on the curb to the highest point on the sign, or
3. The sign is not placed within the street right -of -way.
Section 4. Effective Date This ordinance shall be in full effect upon passage and
publication according to law.
Adopted this 1St day of February, 2000.
Attest:
City Clerk
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Ordinance No. 2000 -3 adopted.
Mayor
*BID AWARDED FOR MOBILE JACOBSEN LAWN MOWER AND ROAD LITE KIT
(PARK AND RECREATION) Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by
Member Kelly for award of bid for mobile Jacobsen lawn mower and road lite kit for Park
and Recreation to recommended bidder, North Star Turf under State Bid Contract #424508
at $61,414.29.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT PRESENTED Manager Hughes reviewed the January
24, 2000, meeting attended by Members Hovland, Kelly, and himself with Phyllis Kohler,
Frank Bennett and Ken Dragseth of the School District. He noted that the City and Edina
School District have undertaken a study to determine the feasibility of constructing new
recreational facilities and renovating others for use by the entire community. If this proves
feasible then consensus was an election would need to be held before June 13, 2000, the
project scope needs definition, and that the School Board and City Council need to hold a
joint meeting. Mr. Hughes stated he believes the City should draft a memo of understanding
for facilities' operation. In his opinion the issues facing the Council included: whether they
want to undertake a referendum; if a referendum is held, what elements of the project should
be included; and the timing of a referendum (Spring 2000, Primary or General Elections of
2000, or Spring 2001). He concluded that it would be recommended that a public opinion
survey be completed with results presented to the Council by early March 2000.
The Council discussed the various aspects of holding an election. They will be considering
whether to: construct a new fieldhouse at the Community Center; improve existing
Page 14
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
gymnasiums, gymnasium support space and theater in the Community Center; renovate
Kuhlman Field; improve the tennis courts and athletic fields at Edina High School; improve
the gymnasium at South View Middle School; and construct an addition at Concord
Elementary School that would contain a gymnasium and storage space. Also discussed was
the possibility of including a .question regarding the potential operating costs of a new Senior
Center; who pays for expense of conducting election; and allocation of operating costs for
new and expanded facilities.
The following concerns were expressed: inclusion of items that could not be used by the City
(four classrooms at Concord School and Kuhlman Field); timing of the referendum; the
locations proposed for additional gymnasiums; making sure that. any and all components
included in a potential referendum are legal; the referendum's ffect on the City's bond
rating; use of artificial turf; and new operating costs.
Following the discussion, February 15, 2000, 5:00 P.M., was set for a joint meeting between
the School District and the Council. In addition, the Council directed staff to proceed with a
public opinion poll as quickly as possible. Mr. Hughes indicated that staff would work with
the School District to have Decision Resources perform the poll.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING PUBLIC AUCTION OF TAX FORFEITED
PROPERTIES Member Hovland introduced the following resolution seconded by
Member Kelly and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-18
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of
Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was dated December 6, 1999,
Non - Conservation Classification List 1114NC.
WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PID 06- 116 -21 -13 -0002, PID 28- 117- 21 -21-
0024 and PID 30- 028 -24 -22 -0036, have heretofore been classified by the Board of County
Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof
and has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no existing or
pending special assessments on said parcels; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that said parcels need not be
withheld -from sale pursuant to M.S. 85.012; M.S. 92.461; M.S. 282.01, Subd. 8.; M.S. 282.018,
Subd. 1; or M.S. 282.018, Subd. 2,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT. RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said
classification is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 7a, it has determined that said parcels of land are not
Page 15
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
V
buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance and that sale of said parcel be limited
to the adjacent properties for attachment thereto.
Adopted this 1St day of February, 2000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
REQUEST RECEIVED FROM 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESSES FOR "LOADING ZONE"
Engineer Hoffman noted that Pinehurst Development Company was scheduled to begin a
large construction project along the Minneapolis side of France Avenue, February 13, 2000.
He noted that the construction will impact several area businesses because of both
construction traffic and some temporary closures to traffic lanes on France Avenue. Because
of their concern several area businesses submitted a request for the installation of "Loading
Zone" signs on the Edina side of France. Mr. Hoffman explained that the Traffic Safety
Committee had reviewed the issue and had made eight recommendations. He added the
recommendations had been reviewed with Marty Rud and Lee Weisman, both board
members of the 501h and France Association. Mr. Hoffman outlined the following eight staff
recommendations:
1. No signage, etc., directing truck traffic northbound on France Avenue, south of W. 51St
Street to go west on W. 51s' Street and then back east on W. 50th Street.
2. No separate signal phase for east /west traffic on W. 50th Street at France Avenue. Use
together with left turn bans as needed.
3. "No Left Turns" posted for both eastbound and westbound W. 50th Street traffic at
France Avenue.
4. Cut angle on barricades on northeast corner of W. 50th Street and France Avenue to
allow for access and better turn movements westbound to northbound.
5. Cut width /angle of barricades on east side of France Avenue at W. 49 1/2 Street to
allow for left turn northbound to westbound and thru lane.
6. Have a loading zone on west side of France Avenue just south of W. 49 1/2 Street as
exists today modified for certain construction events.
7. Remove parking slots on east side of France Avenue from W. 491/2 Street north for an
.additional two spaces to facilitate movement northbound.
8. Remove parking on France Avenue between 49th and 49 1/2 Street from 2/15/00 to
10/1/00.
The Council briefly discussed the disruption that will be caused by the Pinehurst
construction project. Mr. Hoffman estimated that project will begin in February and be
completed sometime in October.
Public Comment
Marty Rud, 6222 France Avenue South, stated he has reviewed the situation with Edina staff,
Minneapolis staff and the Contractor. Mr. Rud said he believed the Edina recommendations
are a workable plan. He noted that as things move along some changes might be needed, but
added that Pinehurst has been a responsible contractor with experience working in the 50th
and France Area. Mr. Rud urged the Council approve the staff recommendations.
Page 16
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
Lee Weisman, 4229 Chowen Avenue, noted that the plan was not perfect, but he suggested
they attempt to implement the recommendations. Mr. Weisman said the Association and
businesses want to see the project proceed.
Member Faust made a motion to accept the previously stated recommendations of the
traffic safety committee and authorize their implementation. Mayor Maetzold seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland. Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
ENTERPRISE FUND FINANCIAL OVERVIEW PRESENTED Assistant Manager Anderson
reviewed the Enterprise Fund Financial Overview. He explained that the City's enterprise
funds are:
The City's "business oriented" operations that are accounted for in separate funds.
• Previous City Councils had the philosophy that enterprise operations should be
funded through user fees. Where feasible, the user should pay for the cost of
operations.
• Each quarter the City's Investment Advisory Committee reviews operations of the
funds and has annual reviews of 5 year plans with the enterprise managers.
• Investment Advisory Committee operates with three goals in mind:
1. Maximize the profits of the Liquor Operation
2. Devise strategy to support enterprises that are in need of subsidy
3. Develop long -term plan to eliminate accumulated cash deficits in funds,
where they exist
• The Investment Advisory Committee is comprised of: City Manager, Assistant City
Manager, Finance Director (Chair), Assistant Finance Director and Park Director.
Mr. Anderson noted that the Edina's nine current enterprise funds represent
approximately $24 million in annual revenue and include:
1. Three Municipal Liquor Stores (York Avenue, Grandview & 501h Street)
2. Utilities (water and sewer)
3. Braemar Arena
4. Art Center
5. Edinborough /Centennial Lakes
6. Braemar & Fred Richards Golf Courses
7. Golf Dome
8. Aquatic Center
9. Communications (special revenue fund)
He individually reviewed each of the enterprises answering questions such as:
• General Overview of Operations - What Do They Do?
• Major Sources of Revenue
• 1999 Estimated Revenues and Expenditures (unaudited)
• 3 Year Analysis of Profit (or loss)
• Sources of Funds for Capital Improvements
Page 17
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2000
• Other Business Issues
• Summary of '99 operations:
Profitable Enterprises:
Current Philosophy for Use of Funds:
Liquor
$900,000
Subsidize Art Center/ Reduce, Cash Def.
Utilities
$540,000
Pay for Utility Improvements
Golf
$230,000
Repay Accumulated Cash Deficit
Pool
$170,000
Repay Loan from Developer's Fund
Dome
$ 67,000
Subsidize.Arena Operations
Near Breakeven:
Arena
$(13,000)
Try to breakeven
In Need of Subsidy:
Edinborou gh/ Centennial Lk
$(170,000)
Rely on Trust fund /seek alternate rev.
Art Center
$ (92,000)
Rely on Liquor profits
Mr. Anderson stated that goals for the City's Enterprises inlcluded:
• Eliminating accumulated cash deficits through transfers
• Putting enterprises in a position where we do not create accumulated deficits in the
future; and
• Establishing a permanent funding vehicle for enterprises requiring subsidy
The Council
CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Kelly approving payment of the following
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 27, 2000, and consisting of
30 pages: General Fund $260,209.06, Communications $24,764.34; Working Capital
$6,825.92, Art Center $16,811.83; Golf Dome Fund $11,180.93, Golf Course Fund $16,477.71;
Ice Arena Fund $2,770.73; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $16,011.52; Utility Fund
$278,157.57; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $988.80, Liquor Dispensary Fund $161,443.77,
Construction Fund $14,414.72; TOTAL $810;056.90. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the
Council Meeting at 9:55 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 18
74�
o,
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman ,Mj
Director of Public Works
Date: 15 February, 2000
Subject: Public Hearing -
Improvement No. TS -31
Vernon Avenue and
Gleason Road Intersection
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # n. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve Improvement Project TS -31 subject to Hennepin County approval and
Mn /DOT approval for funding.
Info /Background:
This is a public hearing for a potential traffic signal installation at Vernon Avenue and
County State Aid Highway 158 (Vernon /Gleason) intersection. This improvement
hearing is held as a result of traffic study recommendations by the City consultant, SRF,
and neighborhood /staff review.
Attached to this report are several items. They include:
A. Existing and proposed traffic signal locations from City Transportation Plan.
B. Feasibility Reports from Mr. Houle on general improvements to the Lincoln/Vernon
corridor.
C. Non - Signalized Intersection Rankings per Hennepin County.
D. Voice mail messages from drivers using the intersection.
Report/Recommendation
Agenda Item II.A.
Page Two
The signal improvement would be to install. a traffic actuated signal to improve access
from Vernon onto the County Road 158. Traditionally, these signals are approved by
Hennepin County if they meet a priority factor of at least 30 points or higher on the
County list. This intersection currently rates a point value of 26. This usually indicates
that Hennepin County would NOT authorize the signal or participate in payment.
However, the consultant, County staff and City staff agree that some of the signal
warrants are met. The consultant and City staff believe this signal is warranted
because of regional transportation issues. The only question then is a matter of timing
for installation. Clearly, the City collector /arterial street (Vernon Avenue) serves as an
augmentation function to the regional freeway system. Many of the City's major streets
serve that function. Staffs view is that the traffic augmentation function is an
appropriate use of the street. The negative side of the issue is increasing volumes
along the street which local residents feel is inappropriate. However, if history of this
area is reviewed, it would indicate the existence of a State highway on this alignment
prior to the freeway system. The freeway system downgraded the roadway to a
collector /arterial street serving as a detached frontage road to TH 169 and Crosstown
62 and the main street for all local residents.
As such, staff would recommend approval of the installation and continue working with
Hennepin. County and Mn /DOT to seek approval for installation and funding.
Ecucnu
o City of Edina
Hennepin County
Existing Signal Lights
Proposed Signal Lights
O Multi - Jurisdiction
City of Edina
Existing Signal Lights
Proposed Signal Lights
OHennepin County
EStale of Minnesota
Existing Signal Lights
Proposed Signal Lights
oState of Minnesota
Multi- Jurisdiction
Existing Signal Lights
Proposed Signal Lights
rt,D11DMI
4N EY AYE.
INTERLADIIEM
0 0 0 � I
OED
0 -.-
SOU�IEW UL
r. V �� I 1 I
o,
. �t I WlOTM 9•
;J
_ 8 crocrTaw wewwT �• �' - Q 1 I
o o o o o
o
jo
o A� .s t0
wmt.ST 00 o O 0
- o
0 0
000
wAEMAR 4yD ti-
DEWEY wU RD \ 1
- - y w 1lTII ST OO so
J
00 EDVM IRD. 0��44 000 ✓ W 1YTM 4' ■
X54 m t O I - WMEaoTAO _
e
cm of aoowm Em of KaaiaTa.
iNTF R,4TATF �W iN IE RS'AiE AY
0 .25 .5 1 mile
sca e
-:4 A Jti Laity of Edina Transportation Plan Figure fl
a4 e s March 1W
Existing & Proposed Signal Locations
y
w91N�11�
�0 FEASIBILITY STUDY
' �� ��• CITY OF EDINA
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS: VERNON AVENUE & GLEASON ROAD
February 15, 2000
LOCATION: The intersection of Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a traffic study completed for the
Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood. This traffic study identified 400 -
500 vehicles per day as cut through traffic. The majority of this
traffic occurs during the typical workday 3:00 to 6:00 PM . An
action plan was proposed that will help reduce through traffic in the
Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood and will also provide additional
safety along Lincoln Drive and Vernon Avenue. The installation of
a traffic signal at Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road is one part of
the long term action plan for the traffic problem that occurs as a
result of the commercial and residential developments at TH 169
and Londonderry Road.
This signal will also provide east and west bound traffic ease of
access from an existing B -Minor Arterial Roadway to an A -Minor
Arterial Roadway.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The intersection of Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road consists of
40 foot wide roadway on the north and south and 36 foot wide
roadway on the west. Traffic control consists of a stop sign for the
east -bound traffic from Vernon Avenue. Gleason Road and
Vernon Avenue (east of Gleason Rd) have a Functional
Classification of A -Minor Arterial Reliever as listed in the 1999 City
of Edina Transportation Plan.
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS: VERNON AVENUE & GLEASON ROAD
February 15, 2000
Page 2
VERNON AVE & GLEASON RD
IMPROVEMENT: Improvements at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Gleason
Road include the installation of traffic control signals. Minor
geometric improvements will be necessary for this signal
installation. Vernon Avenue east of Gleason Road and Gleason
Road from Trunk Highway 62 to Vernon Avenue are Hennepin
County Roadways. Approval from both Hennepin County and
MNDOT will be required for this signal. Hennepin County has
analyzed this intersection and currently have it listed as number 51
on their Non - Signalized Intersection Ranking list. According to the
County's current policy this signal is rated to low too be approved
by the County. Staff recounted vehicles at this intersection on
February 8 and SRF Consulting will reanalyze the County signal
rankings to see if this intersection will move up in the rankings.
But, more than likely additional interaction from the City of Edina
will be required in order to have this signal approved.
A sign was placed at
the stop sign of Vernon
Avenue and Gleason
Road notifying the
public of this public
hearing. Staff also
installed a comment line
for this public hearing.
Twenty -two comments ;
were recorded to date
and are included with
this report.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS: VERNON AVENUE & GLEASON ROAD
February 15, 2000
Page 3
FEASIBILITY: With the exception of County approval for the signal at Vernon
Avenue and Gleason Road this project is feasible from an
engineering standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 2000 -2001 Construction Season
FUNDING: These improvements are proposed to be funded through the
Municipal State -Aid Gas Tax Funds. Hennepin County has
indicated that the County will not contribute any monies for the
traffic signal at Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road.
PROJECT COSTS: Total Project Cost for this improvement is $ 168,000. This cost
includes engineering, clerical, and any finance costs.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint
only if Council orders this project:
Council Orders Public Hearing ......................January 18, 2000
Receive Feasibility Report ........................... February 15, 2000
Public Hearing .......... ............................... February 15, 2000
Bid Opening .. ...............................
Award Contract ............................... ♦
Begin Construction ...........................
Complete Construction ........................
*Dependent on MNDOT and Hennepin County Approval
4,91N�11'>r
ok e
a0 FEASIBILITY STUDY
• Ws • CITY OF EDINA
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: LONDONDERRY ROAD & LINCOLN DRIVE
February 15, 2000
LOCATION: The intersection of Londonderry Road and Lincoln Drive and the
roadway between these intersections.
LONE
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a traffic study completed for the
Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood. This traffic study identified 400 -
500 vehicles per day as cut through traffic. The majority of this
traffic occurs during the typical workday 3:00 to 6:00 PM . An
action plan. Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood and will also provide
additional safety along Lincoln Drive and Vernon Avenue. These
actions include:
1. Reconfigure the intersection of Londonderry Road and
Lincoln Drive to help discourage eastbound left turns
from Londonderry Road to Lincoln Drive toward Dovre
Drive.
2. Improvement of Intersection geometrics and traffic
signal control of Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road
intersection. See Feasibility Study regarding this traffic
signal.
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: LONDONDERRY ROAD & LINCOLN DRIVE
February 15, 2000
Page 2'
Short term actions presented included restricting eastbound
movement at Dovre Drive during the weekday PM peak hours.
Concern at the January 18 Council Meeting was that vehicles
would not have an alternate route out of the neighborhood besides
using the intersection of Vernon and Gleason. Staff has met with
City of Minnetonka Staff and has learned that recent improvements
in the Opus Development on the westerly side of TH 169 enable
northbound vehicles to utilize the interior ring road of the Opus
Development then proceed northbound on 11th Avenue to Excelsior
Boulevard to TH 169. City of Minnetonka Staff recommends that
this be the preferred alternate northerly route out of this
development.
01999 Mapquest.00m, Inc.; 01999 Navgation Tech nobgies
The Viking Hills Neighborhood Association along with the Habitat
Homeowners Association also expressed concerns of safety from
existing and additional traffic along Lincoln Drive and Vernon
Avenue at the January 18 City Council Meeting. Staff was asked
to study Lincoln Drive and Vernon Avenue between the
intersections of Londonderry Road & Lincoln Drive and Vernon
Avenue & Gleason Road.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The intersection of Londonderry Road and Lincoln Drive consists
of 52 foot wide roadway on the west, 46 foot wide roadway on the
north, and a 36 foot wide roadway on the south. Traffic control at
this intersection includes four way stop signs. The roadway to the
east becomes a private drive for Londonderry Townhomes.
Londonderry Road is a major connector to the Trunk Highway 169
interchange. Lincoln Drive south of Londonderry Road has a
Functional Classification of B -Minor Arterial as listed in the 1999
City of Edina Transportation Plan.
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: LONDONDERRY ROAD & LINCOLN DRIVE
February 15, 2000
Page 3
Londonderry Road & Lincoln Drive
v.
Lincoln Drive at the entrance to Habitat Court and Waterford Court
consists of a 32 foot wide roadway with a 40 foot wide right -of-
way. The roadway at this location is a two lane roadway. The
westerly edge of this roadway is adjacent to MNDOT's freeway
fence.
The intersection of Arctic Way and Vernon Avenue consists of a
four way stop and there are pedestrian concerns for people
crossing Vernon going to the park due to traffic violations. Vernon
Avenue from Lincoln Drive to Gleason Road also has a Functional
Classification of B -Minor Arterial as listed in the 1999 City of Edina
Transportation Plan.
Owl
VERNON AVE & ARCTIC WAY / TAMARAC AVE +
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: LONDONDERRY ROAD & LINCOLN DRIVE
February 15, 2000
Page 4
IMPROVEMENT: Improvements to the Londonderry Road and Lincoln Drive
intersection includes providing a free -right movement for east-
bound vehicles from Londonderry Road. Concrete islands would
also be constructed to help channelize the intersection. These
improvements will require approval from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation State -Aid Division (MNDOT).
Improvements to Arctic Way and Vernon Avenue include providing
4 foot concrete center islands that will provide a "safe area" for
pedestrians that cross Vernon Avenue at Arctic Way. The cross-
walk at this intersection will also be relocated to the westerly edge
of this intersection. These improvements will also require
MNDOT's approval.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists with the exception of right turn lane
area which will be dedicated by the developer, Haugland
Company.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 2000 -2001 Construction Season
FUNDING: These improvements are proposed to be funded through the
Municipal State -Aid Gas Tax Funds.
TOP 895.77
:)NDERRY
ROAD
BITUMINOUS 1y
TOP' 897.95
\ Ik
92.50
s8929'02'E 7- 9."s
98
lOP
2.».
�i
00;
�.i�
L
k
i
i'I
! r1oJ4Mtn.� �
950'
r
P
$ Spne.GS
N
TOP 8 ?5.43
INV. 59.43
� °
3
Improvements to Arctic Way and Vernon Avenue include providing
4 foot concrete center islands that will provide a "safe area" for
pedestrians that cross Vernon Avenue at Arctic Way. The cross-
walk at this intersection will also be relocated to the westerly edge
of this intersection. These improvements will also require
MNDOT's approval.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists with the exception of right turn lane
area which will be dedicated by the developer, Haugland
Company.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 2000 -2001 Construction Season
FUNDING: These improvements are proposed to be funded through the
Municipal State -Aid Gas Tax Funds.
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: LONDONDERRY ROAD & LINCOLN DRIVE
February 15, 2000
Page 5
PROJECT COSTS: Cost for these improvements are as follows:
Londonderry Rd & Lincoln Dr $ 76,000
Arctic Way & Vernon Ave $ 3,000
Total Project Cost $ 79,000
OFFICIAL HENN N COUNTY
NON- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RANKING
J
- -- --
R
A
N
LOCATION
SIGNAL
WARRANTS
MET
Traffic volume Factor
Accident
Susce bility Factor
Accident
Severity Factor
r o
Factor
COMMENTS
(PROJECT NUMBER)
Date
Latest
study
RRA
1 2 3
8
s
11
v
U
ACC
E
+
sUF+
K
HRS HRS HRS
HRS
HRS
PTS
F
95
96
97
TOT
F
10006
F
SEF
1
5 @ CSAH 73
1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 11
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
32.0
5
4
11
20
32.0
316.9
31.7
96
4 -WAY STOP; Signal Programmed In 2001 (CP 8111)
09/97
2
13 @ CSAH 81/101
6, 9, 11
7.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
4.0
3.5
21.5
4
8
2
14
22.4
262.1
26.2
70
4 -WAY STOP (6/96) W /FLASHER
05/96
3
109 @ Edinbrook Pkwy
2, 8, 9,11
7.8
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
31.8
2
2
4
8
12.8
252.1
25.2
70
Signal Programmed In 1999 (CP 9819)
02/98
4
30 @ Noble Ave
s, tt
4.5
7.3
0.0
6.9
4.0
3.0
25.7
2
3
2
7
11.2
318.5
31.8
69
No Action Due To TH 610; Road To Be Rem. From Co. System
05190
:.
Zpwaryl ani? -1'
,. >•: ..
6 9,75 ;.
„8.0
., 50
;?00:
:;8,0.
.d0
,<;23.
27x3
„.4
,,.0
,.;4
;:
....5-
80',:3204'
3z.t5
.::.:.
8T
SI nal:IhclUded In .,ear:.... biP ndtn `:SIP. GP.8915)
_... .
g......- g...
07/97
6
103 @ Candlewood Or
2, 9, 11
3.8
8.0
0.0
7.1
4.0
2.9
25.9
3
1
4
8
12.8
260.2
26.0
s5
Sig. Prog. In 2001 (CP 9239)
04/89
7
19 @ Smithtown / Cntry Club
1
8.0
3.0
0.0
7.8
3.0
0.0
21.8
3
1
3
7
11.2
248.6
24.8
58
Signal Included In Year 2000 Of Pending CIP (CP 9821)
06/97
8
10 @ Vicksburg / W. Fish Lk
1,6.9.11
8.0
5.3
0.0
7.8
4.0
4.0
29.0
0
5
0
5
8.0
207.3
20.7
58
4 -WAY STOP (7/96); Signal Programmed In 2000 (CP 8727)
09198
9
17 @ W 39th St
2, 9, 11
2.0
8.0
0.0
6.3
4.0
2.4
22.6
1
0
2
3
4.8
257.5
25.7
53
St Louis Park Not Interested
11/94
16
:,1 .. Rd :> :: :::: °:
2. @:. Co...:.... 103 :.:.
2 tt t3 t 1 :;:.::::
4.8
:. Ba)
; O 0
;8;0
..: a.0
... .....
a
::: x,3
:26:0
......
.. 4
...
:::0
...........
...1
:. :5
e o
...
<t38 2
j3 i3
30,
.....
r ` : p it P t: ,:. S
eS
Defe .ed. end 9 o antis/. Highway ..yst�.m Gha�g ...
03/99
11
..
12 @ 97th Ave N
1, 8, 9, 11
8.0
6.0
0.0
....
8.0
4.0
3.9
29.9
1
2
1
4
6.4
130.1
13.0
49
4 -WAY STOP (12198)
11198
12
152 @ 51st Ave N
2, 8, 9, 11
0.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
1.3
21.3
2
0
2
4
6.4
212.7
21.2
49
HOLD - No Action Proposed
04190
13
9 @ Vicksburg Lane
1, 9, 11
8.0
5.3
0.0
6.8
4.0
3.6
27.6
0
0
3
3
4.8
157.9
15.8
48
4 -WAY STOP; Sig. Ind. In Year 2000 Of Pend. CIP (CP 9912)
04/98
14
81 @ John Milless Or (N Jcl)
1,2.8.9.11
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
3.8
31.8
2
1
0
3
4.8
79.9
8.0
45
10/94
is
_ 52_ 67ih.st .. ; ::.; ;.:
@..
9; 1 t ...... :: :....
...... 1(0
-
. 7 0
;; ? :0:0
. A,0
.. 40
, ,. 1 1
17:1
fi
; ,;i;
.. 1<
, 8
12 9
f46 3
..:. :14 6
`.. a5
City I;ias RegUirst6d Year.2000;C0nsCrUCtliSh . . . : . ..... ....
10/96
16
.
14 a@ Candlewood Dr
2, 9, 11
1.0
8.0
0.0
3.0
4.0
2.6
18.6
0
0
0
0
0.0
252.1
25.2
44
10/97
17
30 @ Rice Lk Rd /Chesshire
9, it
4.8
7.8
0.0
6.8
4.0
2.4
25.8
1
1
2
4
6.4
115.8
11.6
44
Signal Programmed In 1998 (CP 9416)
03/97
18
94 @ Anthony Lane
1, 2, 8, 9, 11
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
32.0
1
2
1
4
6.4
44.0
4.4
43
St. Anthony Not Interested
06195
19
61 @ 42nd Place N
8 9, 11
7.3
5.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
28.3
4
1
1
6
9.6
46.7
4.7
43
10/98
?0
130 t3oondc'i4ve :;;1
@
;:
`2 6 9;it.:.....•;e.o
.........
80
`.:0,0:.:8.0
..
40
,P40
32:0
0
3
.0
;3
48
. ;521
.,.::5.2
..: •,42
4 WAY, SfESP x;Cc�untyCr�ncurced.InCity;Req: or. amp .Sig:
02/98
.1,
21
_ ..............,...............
61 @ Sunset Trail
2,9,11
3.0
8.0
0.0
6.3
4.0
3.0
24.3
1
1
2
4
6.4
107.7
10.8
41
02/99
22
152 @ Northwinds Plaza
2, 8, 9, 11
2.0
8.0
0.0
5.0
4.0
3.2
22.2
3
2
2
7
11.2
77.2
7.7
41
10195
23
61 @ Schmidt Lake Road
1, 9,11
8.0
6.0
0.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
29.0
0
2
1
3
4.8
71.8
7.2
41
4 -WAY STOP (Assumed Jurisdiction 11/1/94)
04198
24
30 @ Revere Ln N
2 8 9, 11
7.3
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
3.0
30.3
1
0......1
2
3.2
52.1
5.2
39
ALL -WAY STOP; Signal Prop In 2002 Prov. CIP CP 9324)
02/90
25
-. :.
. :30. @ :_CSAH :y21- - ;....
1 8' .:L'<:...
-� 9,1:...... .:
,6180.'
.5.:.:
7..
.: 00:
,::... .
. ..... ..:...:.4.
tl:
>40
..:......
31x5'
,::
0.
:.,..
.:.. ::0
0
... _
::.0
:.:.
00
.::718:
7a
3s
A1.4'1NAY $7dP,.Signal Pragra001 1.988:(Gt? 94x6) ..
03/67
26
14 @ 91st Crescent / Ndrsen
9.11
5.0
8.0
0.0
7.0
4.0
2.9
26.6
0
0
2
2
3.2
74.5
7.4
38
07/98
27
24 @ Medina Rd (E. Jct.)
2, 8, 9, 11
7.8
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
1.3
29.0
0
1
2
3
4.8
35.9
3.6
37
08/99
28
101 @ Medina Rd.
11
3.0
6.8
0.0
5.0
3.0
1.2
18.9
2
0
3
5
8.0
99.6
9.9
37
Signal Programmed In 1999 (CP 8911)
03/99
29
9 .@ Old Rockford / Polaris
1,2,8,9,11
8;0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
32:0
0
0
1
1
1.6
30.5
3.0
37
04/99
.36
130::. ;;NOKhlgnd Dr....`::'': <';:2,9t1A,
-.;,,. .
:. 6,:0,.-.:60'-
.:;00.1
..... 6.0
.......... 40':;39
26:8..::1..:.0-
1'
-:!;2,
32.,;:637
6d
36
08/98
31
24 @ CSAH 101
1.8.9.11
8.0
7.3
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
31.3
0
2
0
2
3.2
18.9
1.9
36
4 -WAY STOP; Signal Programmed In 1999 (CP 8911)
02/99
32
12 @ CSAH 14
1, 9,11
8.0
4.5
0.0
6.5
4.0
2.8
25.8
1
1
0
2
3.2
71.8
7.2
36
ALL -WAY STOP (7/96); Sig. Programmed In 2000 (CP 9410)
10/98
33
3 @ Meadowbrook Lane
2, 9,11
0.0
8.0
0.0
6.3
4.0
2.6
20.9
0
0
2
2
3.2
121.2
12.1
36
Signal Proposed In 2003 Prov. CIP (CP 9746)
04196
34
Wi
66 @ Theo. Wirth Pkwy
9.11
5.2
0.0
2.5
4.0
2.5
15.7
3
1
1
.....5
8.0
118.5
11.8_
.. 36
4 -WAY STOP; No Response From City . _ _
02/97
35
.,.
::.:::.
.109. Edtnbrook.:.Grossm x :.. :.
2 9,11 :.:.::
:. 1.5
...1.5
8- tl.;;.:
0. 0...::
0
.... 4,._
.4.
..: 4.::.,
.. - 9
;:. O:d
2.:::
... 0
....:.:1
...:
.. 0!
..<1
::
...6
1 .:::.t2.
::. 20
,
`...- ,::12:2
_ _.
... .:34
._: ..:......:::..::.::;:.. ;.:.
- :. ::::......:... ... ...; :.<
05197
36
1 @ Staring Lake Pkwy
2, 9,11
2.0
8.0
0.0
3.8
4.0
2.9
20.6
2
0
0
2
3.2
99.6
9.9
34
Signal Programmed In 2002 (CP 9618)
07/96
37
81 @ CSAH 150
1, 8, 9, 11
8.0
5.8
0.0
8.0
4.0
2.1
27.8
1
0
0
1
1.6
41.3
4.1
34
4 -WAY STOP W /FLASHER
01/95
38
40 @ Wirth Pkwy
9,11
6.3
2.5
0.0
6.3
4.0
1.3
20.4
" 2
' 2
1
5
8.0
49.4
4.9
33
4 -WAY STOP
11168
39
9. @ Plymouth Blvd.
1,2,8,9,11
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
4.0
4.0
32.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
10.8
1.1
33
Await Impact Of Nearby Signal Planned At Vicksburg
01 /99
40
.
16 "@ ` C_SAFi' .101- ..
1, 91:11 ; !
B:O
::::7.0 ::
.0.0
_..: 8 0
. 4 0
.:: 11:
:, 28:1
-.. 4
..:::1
.0
. -- 2
3 2
,::13.5
LAS R: Wayzata Der�!tetf. Signal -..
osrsa
41
17 @ W 38th St
11
7.0
1.5
0.0
7.1
3.0
1.0
19.6
1
1
1
3
4.8
79.9
8.0
32
12/89
42
31 @ Edinborough / W. 78th
11
3.5
6.3
0.0
4.3
1.0
1.1
16.2
1
3
1
5
8.0
77.2
7.7
32
06192
43
103 @ 109th Ave N
9,11
6.0
4.0
0.0
6.0
4.0
4.0
24.0
1
0
1
2
3.2
41.3
4.1
31
05/98
44
31 @ Southtown Dr
1, s, 11
8.0
6.0
0.0
7.9
4.0
1.5
27.4
0
0
1
1
1.6
13.5
1.3
3o
4 -WAY STOP
11/87
as.
109 W grin Ave N :.
@...y...... 9....
z; 9; 1t„
4.o
e o
0 0
53
:.. 4 0
:: 3 0
2x:3
. 0
..::1
tl
:1
t s
33 2
::: 3 3'
zs
.....
os/sa
46
....
31 @ W. 64th St.
.....
2,9,11
...
0.0
8.0
.0.0
4.0
4.0
2.2
18.2
0
2
0
2
3.2
69.1
-
6.9
28
County Responded To City - No Signal Planned
04/96
47
12 @ Hayden Lake Rd
9, 11
2.0
6.0
0.0
4.0
4.0
1.4
17.4
0
0
0
0
0.0
102.3
10.2
28
04/98
48
1 @ Bennett Place
9,11
1.8
6.5
0.0
2.s
a.o
1.3
16.1
z
1
1
a
6.4
46.4
4.9
27
Signal Programmed In 1998 (CP 9320)
03/66
49
61 @ W Medicine Lk Or
2, 9, 11
3.31-8.:01.
P.O.
4.3
4.0
3.9
23.4
0
0
0
0
0.0
38.6
3.9
27
12/98
50
110' Su rt .field Rd; ,
1 ;- .:.. [- ..
3:8
.. 4 8:
- :::0:0...:3.8
2 Q
:, 1
1.5;5
.. 0
.. [1
0
.:;1
18_
<:84 2
., 4
2fi
.. ... ..
t . af.. ra r item d lri 2000 CP 323 '
o1/se
NOTE: THIS LIST INCLUDES ONLY THE TOP 50 SITES; ADDITIONAL SITES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED.
T:%RANK2.WK3 Page 1 Revised 08/11/99
OFFICIAL HENNEPIN COUNTY
NON- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RANKING
R
A
N
LOCATION
SIGNAL
WARRANTS
MET
ra e volume Factor
Accident
Susceptability Factor I
Accident
Severlty Factor
or
Factor
COMMENTS
(PROJECT NUMBER)
Date
Latest
Study
1
2
3
8
s
t1
v
u
ACC
E
+
suF+
K
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
PTS
F
95
96
97
TOT
F
1000s
F
SE
51
158 @ Vemon / Gleason
9, 11
e.5
4.0
0.0
5.3
4.0
3.0
22.8
0
0
0
0
0.0
35.9
3.6
26
Under Review By City
12/96
52
39 @ Super Valu /Market PI
9,11
3.0
6.8
0.0
4.8
4.0
4.0
22.5
0
0
0
0
0.0
38.6
3.9
26
County Has Agreed To Signal Installation
08196
53
19 @ CSAH 30
11
4.3
2.0
0.0
4.3
3.0
1.8
15.3
0
0
1
1
1.6
94.2
9.4
26
10198
54
9 @ French Regional Park
9
2, 9, 11
0.0
e.0
0.0
1.0
4.0
2.2
15.2
1
0
1
2
3.2
69.1
6.9
25
06196
,$5...,,.12•
:aQ9lh< >AVe N; ;. :�;_:
11�. ;;:;:�r;:::..
:2A1;;E:S.B.r<:00
__
..._ ....................
3.01.i
..._...........................
9.4:.:�
::.0.
.:0.,.0.,,,
56
:;�:.;:;;:::
61 12th Ave N
9, 11
3.0
6.0
0.0
.:.,T.O
3.0
4.0
3.3
19.3
0
1
0
1
1.6
35.9
3.6
24
03/97
57
101 @ Hollybrook / Shadyway
2, 9, 11
0.0
8.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
1.1
13.1
0
2
1
3
4.8
62.9
6.3
24
08/96
58
14 @ 114th Ave / Thou. Pines
9
2.0
4.0
0.0
3.0
4.0
0.0
13.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
68.4
6.6
20
10195
59
28 @ W 86th St
11
_.2.0
... 2.3
- ...0.0
.. 3.1
...2.0
1.1
10.5
_...0
1
0
.. 1
..1.•6
.:..66.4
.......,.6.6
.......79
..................... ........................_ :..,..:...: ::..,....:.
11190
..
;. ':::- '::5....::'
owland „Rd ...:..:. •.
:.:.
2'9'11;•:<: >. -.
r
..:'.1..0..:,8.0.
':<0.0
:_ 2:0:.-
,d.0'_.-
..:2.8-
,.17.8
0
...0..;;..0
::0:0'0
00,
0,0
.. -18:
09/97
61
4 @ Miller Pkwy E
9, 11
2.0
4.0
0.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
16.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
09/96
62
14 @ Regent Pkwy / Sch Ent
11
0.0
5.0
0.0
1.8
2.0
1.1
9.8
1, 0
1
0
1
1.6
33.2
3.3
is
Installation By City Approved
11197
s3
61 Plymouth Rd / Arthur
9,11
0.0
4.5
0.0
0.0
4.0
1.1
9.6
0
1
0
1
1.6
2.7
0.3
11
10/94
T:IRANK2.WK3 Page sed 08/11/99
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
David Brandt
2/2/00, 5:25 PM
4449 415 Ave So,
Minneapolis, MN
55406
612/414 -3233
My comments regarding
the stop sign at Vernon and
near Killarney Lane -- I
would like to see the traffic
move faster through there, I
don't know the best way to
manage traffic flow — there
are experts for that who I
would hope they would be
consulted ... (inaudible) ...
to increase traffic flow
during peak hours Thank
you.
Mrs. Donald
6650 Vernon Ave.
612/936 -9723
We are very interested in
Knutson
So, #210,
having a signal posted at
2/3/00, 2:46 PM
Fountainwoods
Vernon and Gleason. We
have been struggling with
that corner for 15 years and
feel something should be
done about it. So if you
wish to call me fine, if not,
you can just take my
comments. I am in favor of
a signal being put in.
Thank you very much.
Good bye.
Tony Kranz
10700 Brunswick Rd.
612/884 -7171
1 just wanted to make a
2/3/00, 5:02 PM
Bloomington, MN
comment on the
55438
intersection there. I think
there should be a stop light.
It causes, I'm sure there
have been plenty of
accidents, I have seen at
least one accident there.
Traffic moves too fast and
in the winter its hard for
people to make left hand
turns, especially with traffic
coming off from 62 on
Gleason there, they don't
have anything to slow them
down at all to stop them
from keep going at that
pace so I think it would be
a wise investment to put
one there. Thank you. Bye
bye.
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Pam Blomgren
Minneapolis
612/721 -2600
1 think the idea of a stop
2/3/00, 5:54 PM
light is a wonderful idea. I
work right off 169 and
Crosstown and a lot of
times traffic being what it is
during bad weather,
particularly like this
evening, I try and take
some of the city streets as
opposed to taking the
freeway and sitting in
traffic. The stop sign there
can be a terrifically long
wait. And I would very
much enjoy and appreciate
the installation of a stop
li ht. Thanks bye.
Peter Saari
9900 Bren Road E.
612/936 -1866
1 think its a really good idea
2/3/00, 6:15 PM
Minnetonka, MN
and I want you to put one
(Work)
in. I work at United Health
Care, 9900 Bren Road
East, Minnetonka, MN
55455 1 think, or 55435,
something like that.
612/936 -1866 Thank you.
Henry Hatch
6512 Aspen Rd
We definitely need a light
2/5/00, 2:54 PM
Edina
at the corner of Gleason
and Vernon Avenue.
Particularly needed there is
between 7:00 and 9:00 in
the morning and 4:00 and
6:00 at night, the rest of the
time it can probably be a
blinking yellow light.
William & Murial
5916 Walnut Drive
612/945 -0320
We think its very important
Saltzman
Edina 55436
that we have a stop and go
2/6/00,10:47 AM
sign on Gleason and
Vernon . Thank you, bye.
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Marie Steiner
2/6/00, 1:00 PM
5215 Green Farms
Ct
Edina
612/935 -1575
Both my husband, Dr. Lee
Pyles and I are very much
in favor of putting in a stop
signal at the intersection of
Gleason and Vernon. We
both find it very frustrating
to try to cross that street
just about any time of day,
and in fact, it keeps us from
going to the merchants on
Gleason because of the
traffic that we have to incur
to get there. Thank you.
Linnea
5697 Green Circle
I'm calling about the
Christensen
Dr. #219
Gleason and Vernon light
2/6/00, 4:51 PM
Minnetonka, MN
proposal and I definitely
55343
think that would be a
fantastic idea to have a
signal at that intersection.
Often I use that route when
Hwy 169 is blocked during
rush hour as a way to get
to other parts of the City
and its poor visibility and
often quite backed up and I
think it would increase the
flow of traffic. I actually live
in Minnetonka. Thank you,
bye bye.
Jan Aquilina
6423 Vernon Ave S
612/935 -9857
My comment is for those of
2/7/00, 7:30 AM
Edina
us who live on Vernon
Avenue South to be
hassled by a stop light for
the few times at 5:00 when
there is traffic and
sometimes at 8:00 or 8:30
in the morning, a few times
in the week, to have a stop
light for all the times when
its not necessary would
really be a hassle for us.
Thank you.
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Wm. Z. Johnson
6501 Lincoln Dr
612/939 -0600
I'm calling simply to
2/7/00, 9:00 AM
Edina
(Office)
express my
encouragement to get on
with the traffic signal at the
corner of Vernon and
Gleason. That is, my
opinion is it has been
needed for a long, long
time and now that the road
area is being used as an
alternate for 62 & 169, it
certainly is incumbent upon
the city to give us a light
there. Thanks a lot for
hearing the comments.
Bye.
Julie Johnson
743813 th Ave So
612/861 -9535
1 drive this every day and 1
2/7/00, 4:52 PM
Richfield
can't even tell you how
much I believe a light is
needed at this corner.
hope you guys decide to go
for it. Thanks, if you have
any questions you can
always call me.
Jim Ripple
6825 Southdale Rd
612/929 -3459
1 am in favor of installing a
2/7/00, 6:23 PM
Edina
stop light at the corner of
Vernon and Gleason.
Thank you.
Marcie Heil
2/9/00, 8:46 AM
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
936 -1969 1 don't live in the area that
you're considering the light
but I do travel through that
area because I work at
United Health Care and
that area is a big concern.
And yes, I totally agree
there should be a signal
light there because its
getting so dangerous and
in my opinion it has gotten
a lot worse since on
Vernon you.made it
basically a one lane.
Before traffic kind of flowed
y
on two lanes, one now,
what do I want to say,
almost made it a 4 lane but
anyway, so everybody is
actually into one lane now
so there's really almost
never a break in traffic
during a busy time because
everybody's into a single
file instead of actually a
double lane and so it has
gotten terrible and I totally
agree with a traffic light
and I know I feel sorry for
the residents in that area
but anyway that's my
opinion. Thanks very
much.
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Lisa Dahl 6212 Parkwood Rd 939 -0588 1 wanted to put in my vote
2/9/00,10:34 AM Edina in favor of the traffic signal
that's being proposed for 3
reasons. One is that
whenever I've been at the
corner trying to pull out on
Gleason from Vernon its
very hard to get out of there
and I find I just have to floor
the gas in order to make it
past the cars because
they're going fast around
there and its such a busy
corner. It gets backed up
so far at work time, you
know rush hour, that I think
a traffic signal would
actually reduce the
congestion. And then last
of all the obvious reason
that hopefully it will be
something that will help
forward the proposed sign
limiting people to not
turning on Dovre and
cutting through the
Parkwood Knolls area
during peak traffic hours,
the traffic on our street is
unbelievable during those
times and something really
does need to be done
about it. Thank you, bye
now.
0
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Dick Bastyr 6504 Afton Rd 612/935 -0618 The installation of a stop
2/9/00, 3:14 PM Edina 55436 sign on Vernon Avenue
would be a very good idea.
As you know the speed
limit through there is 30
MPH and. it seems like
everybody heading up into
the Indian Hills or coming
from that area is usually
driving between 40 & 45
MPH. The installation of
two lanes in one way
helped the situation but it
also exacerbated because
if you're in the left lane
trying to turn going toward
W. 50th Street, cars coming
very fast from the south
always come into that
second lane that you
created, and it has almost
caused many accidents.
The important thing when
you do put stop signs in
there is that you do, not
have too short of time for
people coming off the
Vernon Avenue extension
entering into the Gleason &
Vernon Avenue section so
they're not going to be
sitting there all day while
the other cars just keep
whistling through way over
the speed limit. That speed
limit should really be taken
a look at as well as the
people that are driving
about 40 to 45 mph in front
of the apartments and right
past Jerrys. People are
very inconsiderate and very
high speed drivers and
think the Edina Police
should really take a look at
that whole situation. Thank
you. I look forward to being
at the meeting. Good bye.
FA
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Carla Kuck
4605 Blaisdell Ave.,
The reason that I'm calling
2/9/00, 4:08 PM
Apt 3,
is because I work in
Minneapolis, MN
Minnetonka and take the
55409
Crosstown which is very
busy in the morning and in
the evening its easier to
take this particular way to
work and that intersection
definitely needs a light
because you could sit there
for 10 minutes and never
move and the line just
backs all the way up, so I
definitely am all for putting
in a street light there.
Thank you.
Terry Foley
4110 Morningside
612/926 -6409
1 would vote in favor of the
2/9/00, 5:09 PM
Rd
Gleason RoadNernon
Edina
Avenue stop light . I take
that road home every day
from work and its quite
congested and actually a
dangerous intersection,
difficult to get across both
in the morning.and in the
evening, so I hope you will
consider putting a stop light
in. Thank you.
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Elizabeth Hoch 6037 Newton Ave 612/869 -5826 1 work at Bren Road, in the
2/9/00, 5:24 PM. South Gateway North Building
Minneapolis 55419 and I live in South
Minneapolis and I commute
this way frequently due to
the fact that its typically
faster and safer than taking
the Crosstown. My
grandma lives right here on
Vernon Avenue, her condo
fronts on Vernon Avenue
and I know there are a lot
of commuters that run
through here and I have
found it to be very
dangerous especially
when you combine
impatient commuters with
all the senior citizens in the
City of Edina and there's
enough traffic going both
directions when coming
from the Crosstown and
going towards the
Crosstown, not to mention
going this other direction on
Vernon where I think it
would be very worthwhile
and very much an interest
of safety to put a light at
that intersection and it
wouldn't even have to be
long, if it would just let 10 to
15 cars make a left hand
turn you know and then
wait again for another 3
minutes. If it was a quick
cycle I think it would be the
best idea. Otherwise you're
gonna back up a lot on that
road and just anger those
residents there so that's my
opinion. If you have any
questions, give me a call.
Thanks, bye.
9
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Brian Stevens
yesterday, 5:33
PM.
7333 Gallagher Dr
#113
Edina 55435
612/831 -5612
1 am strongly in favor of
having a stop light at
Vernon and Gleason and
would really really
appreciate if we did so. And
that's about it. I travel
numerous times at that
intersection and really
appreciate if we had a stop
li ht there. Thank you.
Neil Maldeis
6016 Tamarack Ave
612/938 -2510
My comments are yes it is
2/9/00, 7:49 PM
Edina'
definitely a hassle there, I
live in the neighborhood
there and during rush
hours, depending on the
weather, its impossible to
get out of that
neighborhood there. My
biggest concern is it seems
like we're being sacrificed
for another neighborhood in
Edina that's got similar
problems with traffic and I
guess I trust that a good
solution that alleviates the
problem elsewhere. It
seems like the businesses
back there like United
Health care just have too
many cars and they're the
ones that are causing the
problems so its a shame it
has to come through
residential neighborhoods
and mess things up.
Thanks.
10
RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Kim Schneider
5105 Oakland Ave
930 -6444
1 drive that Vernon route
2/9/00, 8:26 PM
South
every day to and from
_,
Minneapolis
work, I work in Opus so I'm
coming from near Lake
Nokomis over to there and I
think it would be great to
put in a stop light
particularly at the rush hour
time. I can see that the
neighborhood maybe
wouldn't want a traffic light
during the day when there's
not a lot of traffic so if
there's a way it can be
monitored so that maybe its
flashing from 9:00 in the
morning until 4:00 in the
afternoon, something like
that, but otherwise it would
be quite helpful because
know a lot of people who
avoid that intersection and
take back streets and come
out on Blake Road and that
puts a lot more traffic on to
the residential street.
Thank you.
11
j Agenda Item II.A.
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Pat Baier 6730 Vernon Ave 933 -6472 I'm very much in favor of a
2/10/00 Edina 55436 stop sign, not just a stop
5:53 PM sign, a signal light at the
corner of Gleason &
Vernon. I think it would
improve the safety of this
corner, this very dangerous
corner, both for pedestrians
and for the traffic. If you
need to call me again my.
number is 933 -6472.
Thank you.
1
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Sheri Peterson 6121 Arctic Way 939 -0445 I am a resident of Viking
2/11/00 Edina Hills and have a lot of use
6:48 AM of that .road where the
signal may go in, and I had
some thoughts to let you
know. First of all I wanted
to thank the City for doing
the new signage down
there,right at Vernon &
Gleason and the new lines
that have been painted
there have really helped a
lot with the traffic that has
been bad in the past. I
think that's really improved.
The problem probably
remains still just a couple
times during the day, I
would say a little bit in the
morning, I would say 15 to
20 minutes early morning
and then again from 5:00 to
5:30 or so in the evening.
Other than that there's
really not a problem there.
So I'm hoping that if a light
has to go in there it could
be a smart light or some
type of light that perhaps
during the majority part of
the day could be flashing
yellow for the Gleason to
Vernon traffic, the main
road there, and then just
flashing red for the turning
traffic that's south or
northeast bound as they
turn off of Vernon from
where I live, Arctic way.
Because otherwise I think it
will cause a lot of delay if it
was always going to be the
red, green and yellow light
all the time, all day long,
but I think if it was flashing
for the majority part of the
day it would just be enough
for people to kind of watch
2
q
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
3
it and be a little slow and
careful at that intersection
which would really help but
yet not limit the turning
traffic because that's really
my only outlet now I guess
onto Vernon and Gleason
and to having to wait for a
red light to change all the
time would be kind of a
hassle but I think this would
be the best of both worlds if
you could make that do the
red, green and yellow thing
just for a half an hour just a
couple times a day or so.
That's just my comment
and the other one would be
I wondered if the City
Council would have more
impact talking to the MDOT
people who control the
ramp lights on 169 because
people when they call, you
know individuals, have no
power to change that. I
would think that the City
Council would have a little
more clout if we could free
those lights up a little it may
ease the traffic a little on
Vernon that comes down
our way. So thank you for
listening and good luck with
your decision. Bye.
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Marilyn Clark
5013 Yvonne Terr.
925 -5336
1 drive back and forth on
2/11/00
Edina
that Vernon extension
4:04PM
every day and would like to
see a stop light put in at
that intersection. I have
observed many occasions
when there were some
near close misses with
traffic, and its a real
congested area and very
confusing there, and I think
it would improve the
efficiency of the drive
through that area and
minimize any accidents or
potential accidents if there
was a stoplight. Thank
you for hearing my
comments.
Nancy Utter
6831 Langford Drive
933 -4127
1 think we need a traffic
2/14/00
Edina
signal there. You just can't
12:07 PM
travel east at 5:00 PM, the
line is just too long so
really do think something
needs to be done to fix that
problem. Thanks a lot.
Bye bye.
Dan Herman
6624 West Shore Dr
I'm'at the corner of Vernon
2/14/00
Edina 55435
& Gleason waiting for
4:53 PM
people to go so I can come
across. I think a traffic light
at this intersection would
be, is greatly needed and
would be greatly
appreciated. I live in Edina,
work in Edina and get my
coffee in Edina so that's my
two cents. Thanks a lot
bye.
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Chris Koch 48 th & Chowen 251 -7681 1 live at 48th & Chowen in
2/14/00 Minneapolis Minneapolis and I commute
5:18 PM back and forth from 48th &
Chowen along 50th Street
to Eden Prairie at the Opus
complex. All I can tell you
is that right now I'm sitting
on my cell phone trying to
make that left turn coming
out of Opus onto Tracy.
This is hell. If you people
don't put a stop sign here
you will probably be sued
for endangering people. It
is one of the most
dangerous left turns
anyone can make and I
would appreciate so much,
my family would appreciate
so much, if you could do
something because its
extremely dangerous; even
more so on snowy days
when you're going slowly
up the hill there trying to
make a left turn and you
don't have traction and
traffic's backed up almost
3/4 of a mile sometimes, its
terrible. Please do
something, please.
5
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL
Rebecca Larson 6300 Westwood Ct 935 -8325 1 believe that's all the
2/14/00 Edina information you said you
5:58 PM wanted. Like you said my
comments regarding the
Parkwood Knolls traffic
issue I personally find any
such actions such as a no
right turn sign onto the
Dovre /Lincoln intersection
to be unnecessary.
believe that I'm part of a
neighborhood and I would
like to get into my
neighborhood that way and
I believe it would be more
of an inconvenience to
neighborhood residents
then it would be to actually
limit the amount of traffic. I
also believe speed bumps
and street modifications
would also be extraneous,
unnecessary procedures.
Well I do not find a problem
with it and I'm fully
supportive of adding more
lanes, metered lanes, to
get onto 169 north, but
other than that I think all
these are unnecessary.
There's more important
matters such as the
Gleason/Vernon
intersection that should be
taken care of, and this is
just a minor problem that
just a little bit of toleration
would fix. Thank you.
A
ADDITIONAL RESIDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA VOICE MAIL .
Rich Hames
6217 Parkwood Rd.
I'm calling to very
yesterday
Edina
enthusiastically support the
6:52 PM
increased traffic control in
the Parkwood Knolls and I
think its the Viking
neighborhood. And we're
very interested in seeing,
the Viking Hills
neighborhood, we're very
interested in seeing the
traffic control signal be
installed at Vernon &
Gleason and any other
traffic control that can
mitigate the traffic in the
neighborhood would be
greatly appreciated. Its
very bothersome and very
concerning to us as
residents, to see it
continually increase and we
think that Edina has
enough density now as it is,
and we hope that Edina
can slow its growth just a
little bit. Thank you very
much.
11
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: February 15, 2000
Subject: Final Rezoning Haugland
Company. Tracts A& B,
RLS #1378
Recommendation:
Agenda Item:
III. A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends final rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling
Unit District to PCD -1, Planned Commercial District and designation of commercial on
the Comprehensive Land Use Map, subject to:
1. Developer's Agreement covering widening of Lincoln Drive and providing
center turn lane adjacent to site.
2. Easement to accommodate modification of the Lincoln Drive and
Londonderry Road intersection.
3. Watershed District permit.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and final development
plans.
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 26, 2000
Z -99 -1 Haugland Company
5850 Opus Parkway, suite 108
Request: Final rezoning, amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan map, and amendment to the zoning
ordinance.
Location: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1378
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council, on December 21,
1999, granted preliminary rezoning for the proposed development. The
proponents have now presented plans in support of their request for Final
Rezoning approval.
Mr. Larsen explained the final plans illustrate a multi- tenant retail building
of 10,800 square feet, which is 1,000 square feet larger than in the preliminary
plan. Parking is increased from 67 to 83 spaces. Code requires a minimum of
67 spaces for a building of this size. The proposed development plans comply
with all requirements for Final Rezoning approval.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the development plans continue to illustrate a
drive through drop -off for the cleaners located at the southeasterly corner of the
building. The zoning ordinance specifically prohibits drive though facilities for
banks and restaurants in the PCD -1 district, but is unclear about other uses.
Staff suggests the following amendment to clarify ordinance language
concerning drive through facilities: Drive through facilities, except for
financial institutions, and food establishments as defined in Section 720 of
the City Code.
Mr. Larsen said over the past several months the City Traffic Safety
Committee has been studying traffic issues in the greater Parkwood Knolls
neighborhood. One of the recommendations of the Committee is a redesign of
the intersection of Lincoln and Londonderry. The design impacts the
northeasterly corner of this development site as shown on the site plan
submitted by the developer. In order to complete the reconstruction of the
intersection the developer will need to dedicate an easement over this area.
This can be done without impacting the development.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed final plans meet all requirements for
Final Rezoning, and no variances are requested. Staff recommends approval
subject to:
1. Developer's Agreement to include the widening and turn lanes on
Lincoln Drive.
2. Dedication of additional right of way in northeasterly portion of site
necessary for reconstruction of Lincoln Londonderry intersection.
Staff also recommends the Zoning Ordinance amendment mentioned.
above.
The proponent, Mr. Gene Haugland of Haugland Company was present to
respond to questions.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if Vernon Avenue is a
County road. Mr. Larsen responded in the affirmative. Commissioner
McClelland further questioned if the County will allow signalization on Vernon
Avenue and Gleason Road. Mr. Larsen responded that staff believe a traffic
signal will be allowed, but the City of Edina will pay for it.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen how staff would prevent other
drive - through uses from "going in" if the proposed drive - through dry cleaner
vacates the space. She pointed out the drive - through situation on Gus Young
Lane. Mr. Larsen explained staff is requesting an amendment to the PCD -1
zoning district which would add and clarify permitted drive - through uses in that
zoning district. Mr. Larsen said staff believes a dry cleaning establishment with
a drive - through option is less intense than what is allowed in the PCD -2 zoning
district regarding drive - through uses. Commissioner Swenson asked if the
requested ordinance amendment would "clean up" the ordinance. Mr. Larsen
said that is correct.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen what in his opinion is the
advantage of drive - through facilities. Mr. Larsen said from a zoning standpoint
drive - through facilities reduce the demand of on -site parking.
Commissioner McClelland noted she would like some type of assurance
from staff that a traffic signal will be erected at Vernon /Gleason. Mr. Larsen said
erection of a traffic signal at the Vernon /Gleason location will be heard by the
City Council some time in March 2000.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the proposed widening and re-
stripping of Lincoln Drive to three lanes is timed to coincide with the construction
of the store. Mr. Larsen said the road improvements will be completed when the
store opens.
Commissioner Lonsbury noted the square footage of the proposed retail
store has increased, and questioned how that happened. Mr. Haugland
explained an adjustment was made to the building locating in closer to the rear
property line. He added the building was maneuvered to the west and north
which lowered the profile of the building while accommodating the proposed
change in the intersection at Londonderry Road and Lincoln Drive.
Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend adoption of amendment to
the zoning ordinance to more clearly define drive- through facilities in the PCD -1
zoning district. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye;
motion carried 6 -0.
Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend final rezoning approval
and amendment to the zoning ordinance subject to: 'Developers Agreement to
include the widening and turn lanes on Lincoln Drive and dedication of additional
right of way in northeasterly portion of the subject side necessary for
reconstruction of Lincoln /Londonderry intersection. Commissioner Bergman
seconded the motion.
Chairman Johnson asked Commissioner's Swenson and Bergman if they
would accept an amendment to their motion to include "with the recommendation
that a stop light be erected at Vernon /Gleason. Commissioner's Swenson and
Bergman accepted that amendment.
All voted aye; motion carried 6 -0
REZONING
NUMBER Z -99 -1
L O C A T 10 N Londonderry Road and Hwy 169
R E O U E S T Rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to
PCD -2, Planned Residence District.
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
i
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 26, 2000
STAFF REPORT
Z -99 -1 Haugland Company
5850 Opus Parkway, suite 108
Request: Amend Comprehensive Plan map from single
family to commercial. Rezoning from R -1 to
commercial
Location: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1378
Hennepin County,. Minnesota
The City Council, on December 21, 1999, granted preliminary rezoning for
the proposed development. The proponents have now presented plans in
support of their request for Final Rezoning approval. I .
The Final plans illustrate a multi- tenant retail building of 10,800 square
feet, which is 1.,000 square feet larger than in the preliminary plan. Parking is
increased from 67 to 83 spaces. Code requires a minimum of 67 spaces for a
building of this size. The proposed development plans comply with all
requirements for Final Rezoning approval.
The development plans continue to illustrate a drive through drop -off for
the cleaners located at the southeasterly corner of the building. The zoning
ordinance specifically prohibits drive though facilities for banks and restaurants
in the PCD -1 district, but is unclear about other uses. Staff suggests the
following amendment to clarify ordinance language concerning drive through
facilities:
Accessory Uses in PCD -1.
Drive through facilities, except for financial institutions, and food
establishments as defined in Section 720 of the City Code.
Puy
s
.�19 �ti4r
LONDONDERRY / �A1 RY
ROAD
f,to cv. rwig,
our000k
P *Z4
ORIGINAL PLAN
t
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 21,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall wke Members Faust, H/land, Kelly, and Mayor Maetzold.
CO
AGENDA
.X
seconded by Member Faust approvin the Counci
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
OF THE REGULAR
Hovland and seconded by Member Fa
of December 7,1999, and Special Mee
Motion carried on rollcall vote - f r
made by Member Hovland and
;ent Agenda as presented.
)F DECEMBER 7
L
199 APPROVED Motion made by Member
approv g the Minutes of the Regular Meeting
of Decem er 6, 1999.
ayes.
PRELIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR HAUGLAND COMPANY, TRACTS A AND B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
1378, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVED Planner Larsen explained the
subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 169 and
Londonderry Road.. The property is vacant and zoned R -1, Single Dwelling District. The
proponents have requested that the site be designated as Commercial and be rezoned to
PCD -1, allowing development of a small retail strip center. The site currently is treated as
part of the right -of -way, and carries a designation of Single Family Residential.
Staff has researched the history of the site and it appears the property has been ignored in the
Comprehensive Plan. The parcel was originally part of the property to the east, which is now
United Health Care. The property was developed in the mid 60's as an office/ industrial
facility. Part of the property was acquired by Hennepin County for the construction of
Highway 169. Following construction, the unused property was re- acquired by the owners of
the United Health Care site. No development proposals have ever been reviewed for the
property. It appears that the site may have originally been zoned industrial along with the
balance of the site. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps appear to treat the property as
part of the interchange right -of -way.
The site contains an area of 1.75 acres. The proposed building would contain a gross floor
area of 9,800 square feet. Parking for 67 cars would be provided. A commercial building of
this size requires 61 parking spaces. The plan meets or exceeds the minimum building
setback of 35 feet, and provides the required 20 foot setback for parking. The proposed plan
requires no variances. Preliminary approval has been given for curb cuts by Engineering.
The proposal initially presented to the Planning Commission was for PCD -2, Planned
Commercial District. PCD -2 is the zoning district used for most of 501h and France and
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 21,1999
A
Grandview. Following extensive discussions on two occasions, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the preliminary rezoning from R -1 Zoning to PCD -1 Zoning, and
an amendment to the comprehensive plan map and subject to final rezoning and engineering
approval of road width on Lincoln Drive.
Mr. Larsen explained that a revised traffic study was provided by Benshoof and Associates.
The original study had included Veterans Day in the base count. The revised study was
based on counts taken on December 6, and 7,1999.
Council comments
Member Faust asked if United Health Care has paid taxes on the parcel. Mr. Larsen stated the
parcel was not tax exempt.
Member Hovland asked who the right -of -way would be purchased from to clean up the
northeast corner. Mr. Larsen said, 1) the right -of -way would be dedicated by the developer,
and 2) traffic movement southbound on Lincoln Drive would be encouraged as opposed to
going northbound and geometrics would be. altered to make northbound travel more
difficult. Member Hovland inquired whether that could be made a condition of approval. Mr.
Larsen stated the only condition would be one that affects the property, not the traffic
interchange. Member Hovland asked if Lincoln Drive must be widened, who would pay. Mr.
Larsen said he assumed the developer would be responsible. Member Hovland asked if this
issue needed to be made a condition of approval. Mr. Larsen said at this point staff is saying
the widening is necessary and additional right -of -way needed. The proposal is in the
conceptual stage and will be brought back before the Council again. Member Hovland added
a resident requested that Lincoln Drive be widened before the development occurs and he
believed this to be a fair request. He said since the parcel at present is zoned R -1 could it be
left as is. Mr. Larsen said the City is faced with entertaining a reasonable development since
it is privately owned. Member Hovland asked if it could be left alone. Mr. Larsen replied
leaving the property alone would be the same as imposing a moratorium. .
Member Faust asked if there is green space proposed along the highway. She stated she
believes there should be green space in the front of the development rather than along the
highway. She suggested adding a berm on the site.
Member Kelly said he understood with this type of zoning, drive -thrus would not be
permitted. Mr. Larsen said what is suggested would be a drop- off /pick -up window such as
at a cleaners. Member Kelly asked clarification on how the distinction would be made. Mr.
Larsen said he believes there are two choices, 1) not allow anything that resembles a drive -
thru, or 2) grant the variance and let it happen. Member Kelly asked further clarification of
the Benshoof report of how much traffic is expected from Hwy. 169 to the site.
Mayor Maetzold suggested Mr. Benshoof answer the questions during his presentation. He
further asked who would pay for a sidewalk on the east side which is not connected to the
development. Engineer Hoffman said it may be a logical thing for United Health Care to be
responsible for the sidewalk.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 21,1999
Member Kelly noted if the project is approved, safe pedestrian traffic from the neighborhood
must be addressed.
Member Faust questioned why the proponent requested rezoning to PCD -2 and the Planning
Commission recommended PCD -1. Mr. Larsen commented the Planning Commission
believed PCD -1 to be the appropriate zoning for the site.
Traffic Engineer's Report
Jim Benshoof, Benshoof and Associates, answered the question about new trips generated
from Hwy 169 to the proposed redevelopment. Mr. Benshoof said in his estimation, trips
generated would be very minor. He noted Benshoof and Associates see this development
more oriented to the neighborhood and nearby businesses. Mr. Benshoof responded to the
question of pedestrian safety between the development and United Health Care; and
pedestrian movement within the neighborhood. A sidewalk exists on the east side on Lincoln
Drive which extends into the neighborhood to the south which will remain available for the
area. The proposal is a striped and signed crosswalk across Lincoln Drive, south of the main
driveway of the new development. The sidewalk to the development would be extended to
the west side of Lincoln Drive. A sidewalk exists on the United Health Care property that is
proposed to be extended down to the new crosswalk location.
Member Faust noted a letter was received from United Health Care about lay -offs. She
inquired whether the lay -offs were taken into consideration with the report. Mr. Benshoof
said he was not aware of this happening, but could reduce traffic volume in the area
proportionally.
Member Kelly said he is troubled that a retail development will cause continuous diversion
from Hwy 169 from traffic not normally exiting on Londonderry.
Member Hovland questioned the comparatives used for use of the site between office and
medical office buildings. Mr. Benshoof answered that Mr. Haugland had furnished the
information. Gene Haugland said he furnished the numbers based upon parking
requirements for the site. Member Hovland asked why was the assumption made that 30% of
the traffic would be by -pass trips that are presently on Lincoln Drive. Mr. Benshoof replied
the 30% was based on his considerable experience and nationally published data in terms of
traffic trips generated by this type of development.
Mayor Maetzold asked what would happen with motorists trying to re -enter Hwy 169 after
stopping at the convenience store; having to wait at a meter. Mr. Benshoof said they may
stop just once. Mayor Maetzold questioned the number of car trips at one every two minutes.
Mr. Benshoof said he did not believe there would be a substantial increase in volume on
Lincoln Drive.
Member Faust asked whether traffic in the area would be calmed by putting a STOP light at
Vernon and Gleason; and whether the County had made a decision on funding. Mr. Hoffman
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Counci]/December 21,1999
responded the County will not fund that STOP light. This would be one part of the larger
area plan that has not been resolved. Member Faust asked if state gas tax funds could be used
to fund this. Mr. Hoffman said yes those funds could be used if the roadways were on the
C.S.A.H. system. Member Faust asked if the amount needed would be in the area of $120, 000
to $140,000. Mr. Hoffman said the County would pay for it.
Member Maetzold encouraged expediency with putting in the street light at Vernon and
Gleason, even if it must be funded by the City. Mr. Hoffman said the County had been
encouraged to move that location up on the list, but the list has not changed.
Member Faust stated she believes a STOP light at that location would be the answer to the
problem.
Mr. Hughes indicated that within a month the greater Parkwood Knolls issue will be before
the Council and discussing traffic in the area at that time would be appropriate.
Member Kelly asked if knowing the traffic concerns will be addressed in the near future he
asked whether anything about this development was troubling. Mr. Hoffman said he looks at
this proposal as a miniature Centennial Lakes and a good fit for the area. He does not believe
that Highway 169 traffic will be a problem.
Mayor Maetzold explained he has clocked the distance from Jerry's to the site at three miles.
He asked if the proposed crosswalk could be signalized with a blinking light. Mr. Hoffman .
said he was leery of having a crosswalk in that location, but United Health Care put one in
and it worked fine. He suggested maybe adding a flasher to the crosswalk. Mayor Maetzold
asked the approximate cost of a flasher. Mr. Hoffman said approximately $4,000 - $5,000.
Developer comment
Mr. Haugland, Developer, responded to questions asked by the Council. He explained the
site is actually two taxable parcels of land. He responded to the question about a drive -thru
operation, the proposal shows a pick -up /drop -off for a cleaners. He stated he interprets the
zoning code that says specifically that "drive -ins for food establishments are disallowed as
well as banks in PCD -1 ". It does not say that generally drive -thrus are disallowed. He has a
letter from Caribou Coffee stating their interest in the area, but under the zoning code their
use would not be permitted. Mr. Haugland stated that the green area has a setback of 20 feet
that may require a variance if it were re- oriented on the site. He explained the street that
would require widening would be the responsibility of the developer. Mr. Haugland
indicated he had conversed with United Health Care about the sidewalk and the turn lane
issue; and United Health Care is delighted with both issues.
Public comment
Bennett Moyle, 5736 Tucker Lane, President of the Londonderry Townhomes explained their
homes are the closest residential development in the area, and he is very concerned with the
proposed development. The residents of the twnhomes were polled and three - fourths of
them were not in favor of the development. He elaborated that: 1) there are no sidewalks on
Page 4
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/December 21,1999
Lincoln Drive; 2) the area has elevation and trees making installation of a sidewalk
challenging; 3) walkers from the Parkwood area would be walking on the street, 4) there will
be more walkers with a crosswalk in the middle of the block; 5) Townhome residents are
opposed to additional traffic as well as the litter that comes from this type of business; 6)
United Health Care appears as a one story office building because of the elevation downhill
where it is actually a three story building; and 7) lights from a mini -mall will be very
conspicuous while other area developments are behind berms.
Tom Moses, 6810 Langford Drive, said the question was asked if the State would consider the
site as future right -of -way for access to Hwy 169. He stated the proposal has a lot of
components and he believed if all are approved the site will fall onto Hwy 169. While traffic
is a major concern, the crosswalk, in the location proposed, will require a person with a
checkered flag on each side of the street because traffic speed is high. He questioned where
parking will be with all the green space proposed. Previously the site has been used to dump
snow, and questioned where will it be dumped now. He noted if a mini -mall is required,
residents merely need to cross Bren Road and all the services are right there. He concluded
that an office building makes more sense than three retail businesses and would add less
traffic to the area.
Victor Lyons, 6928 Langford Drive, (Parkway Manor), commented that Parkway Manor has
144 units with the majority of the residents disagreeing with three retail businesses being
proposed for this dangerous piece of property. The reorientation of Hwy 169 has created a
traffic jam on the corner entering Bren Road. He voiced disagreement with proposed
entrances to the site and asked consideration be given to the site being used for an office
building which would add to the area.
Member Faust made a motion to close the hearing. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Council comments
Member Kelly asked if the development is approved could conditions be placed on the
approval for stronger language regarding drive - thrus. Mr. Larsen said that seemed
appropriate. He sited another example of a drive -thru would be that of a pharmacy. Attorney
Gilligan said what Planner Larsen is referring to is an amendment to the zoning code. If the
proponent had a development plan approved, it would have to be decided whether the
proponent would be grandfathered from the zoning code change.
Manager Hughes reminded the Council the issue at this time is preliminary zoning, not final
zoning. If the proposal was approved it would return to the Planning Commission for final
plans, then return to the Council at a later time for final approval. If an ordinance
amendment was considered, it could be heard by the Planning Commission and have the
change enacted by the Council at the same time final zoning is considered.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City council/December 21,1999
Member Hovland asked if there is a HOV lane on northbound Highway 169. Mr. Hoffman
said yes and it carries a lot of volume.
Member Faust stated she is familiar with the area and feels the developer has the right to
develop their property. The City cannot afford to purchase the land. It is worth around
$200,000 to $400,000. Member Faust said she believes the development, as proposed, will be a
low traffic generator. Many residents in the area are retirees and do not leave their homes
until 9:00 A.M. They are out between 3:00 - 6:00 P.M. when a coffee shop would not generate
a lot of traffic. She suggested installation of a red walk -light if possible. Mr. Hoffman said he
does not believe this spot would warrant a red walk -light when many other busier signals do
not have one. When making her decision, Member Faust took into consideration the lay -offs
at United Health Care. She would reluctantly support the proposed project going forward
because of the least amount of traffic being generated by a proposed development.
Member Hovland stated he knows Mr. Haugland does very good work and he wished he
could get more excited about the project. He is uncomfortable about traffic in the area. He
emotionally would like to see the site left alone, yet recognizes the developer has a right to
develop his property. The Council can make sure the site is used for the best use possible, or
the City could buy it. In the scheme of options, the most palatable would be the retail center
as proposed. He said he would support the plan as proposed to PCD -1 with the
recommended conditions and amendment to the comprehensive plan. He thanked Mr.
Haugland for paying for the proposed roadwork.
Member Kelly noted the Council all had the same degree of difficulty making a decision, but
are all concluding the same thing. The. primary concern in the area is traffic. One resident
said he believed traffic would be less with an office building, Member Kelly disagreed. The
area is an inappropriate place for park land, i.e. the land abuts Hwy 169, and is in the middle
of an industrial area. The developer is a reputable developer and has a right to develop his
property. The real concern is which generates less traffic. He believes the issues that must be
addressed are the drive -thru issue and the pedestrian safety issue. With the new technology
in downcast lighting, he believes lighting of the site as well as signage will not create a
problem for the neighbors. Member Kelly again stated he believes the proposed use of the
site will generate much less traffic than any other use for the site.
Mayor. Maetzold stated his belief that this is the best use of the land. He reiterated the
property owner cannot be denied the right to develop the site with little negative impact. He
believes- further an office building would generate more traffic. He voiced concern with the
pedestrian crosswalk, as proposed, and encouraged more study of it. Mayor Maetzold said
he would support the proposal conditioned upon Final Rezoning, the widening of Lincoln
Drive, and dedication of the needed right -of -way at the northeast corner of Lincoln and
Londonderry Drives.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 21,1999
Member Kelly moved app, of the proposed rezoning conditioned upon Final
Rezoning, the widening of L coin Drive, dedication of the needed right -of -way at the
northeast °corner of Lincoln and ondonderry Drives and First Reading of the following:
O DINANCE NO.850 -A16
AN ORDINANCE AME ING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO.850)
BY REZO NG PROPERTY TO PCD -1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 50 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Commercial District, PCD -1 is enlarged by the addition of the
following property:
Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey ' 0.1378, Hennepin County , Minnesota.
The extent of the Single Dwelling District (�1) is reduced by removing the property
described above from the Single Dwelling D� strict." Member Hovland seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution nd moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
AMENDING THE COMPREHE SIVE PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City .Council of the City f Edina, Minnesota, that the
Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended by changing a designation for the property
located at Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1378, ennepin County, Minnesota
on the 1980 City Land Use Map from single family to commer 'al.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APP VING FINAL AT FOR MS ADDITION TO EDINA
Planner Larsen explained the subje roperty is developed single dwelling lot measuring
39 029 s "are foot in area and locate t 5233 chwood Drive. The proposed subdivision
q
would split off the northerly portion of e 1
existing dwelling would remain. At the Se t
plat was granted subject to three conditions, F
the granting of a drainage easement as ap
indicated all conditions for final approval .
$4,800.00.
No Council or audience comments were
)r erty to create one new buildable lot. The
ber 21, 1999, Council meeting, preliminary
1 Plat approval, Subdivision Dedication and
rov by the City Engineer. Planner Larsen
ve be , satisfied with park dedication set at
Member Hovland made a motion to cl se the public hearing.
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetz d
Motion carried.
Page 7
Faust seconded the
KKE.
DEVELOPED BY:
eLee
HAUGLAN D
i
Architects. eNo
900 First Avenue North
1 i
Minniapolia. NN 55401
*yj
912/999 -4200
FAX 942 -9267
t
I
�
KKE.
DEVELOPED BY:
HAUGLAN D
i
Architects. eNo
900 First Avenue North
KKE.
DEVELOPED BY:
HAUGLAN D
goy Kr� Mcksan
Architects. eNo
900 First Avenue North
PROPERTY
Minniapolia. NN 55401
912/999 -4200
FAX 942 -9267
8' O' 4' 'B' Ib'
NMTH 6rap/i/c xo /a
Na Date Revision Description
LONDONDERRY SHOPS — — De 00001-12-0 s>
CITY SUBMITTAL D °' "EL
— �a � Al
EDINA, MINNESOTA —�"
twnp Sam p vti+r am nn�.vo:am k
T.O. STUD)
�T,O BRIGI
Y 120 =0'
SOFFIT
112' -O'
FF.E.
I00'_O'
N il 5TUD
' -O"
SOUTH ELEVATION
I /B• • I' -0•
T-O. STI1D_J�
121' -8 -b•
O. BRICK
120' -O'
_ SOFFIT
113' -0�
FFE.
I -01 le
EAST ELEVATION
PREFIN. METAL COPIN6-
NEON PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
ILLUM. CLOCK
EIFS - 2 COLORS �-
INTERIOR ILLUMINATED
516NA6E
CANVAS AYLUN6-
BRICK - 2 COLORS
ANOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT--
ROCKFACE Cw BASE - 2 COLORS -
PREFIN. METAL COPIN&
NEON PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
ILLUM, CLOCK
EIFS - 2 COLORS
INTERIOR ILLUMINATED
516NA&E
CANVAS AYPIIN6
BRICK - 2 COLORS
ANOO. ALUM STOREFRONT
ROCKFACE Cw BASE - 2 COLORS
■P ■_®
IIII ®mm o
• €n�vna-ion- Illlllw
Y1 =f� ® '- ®w mmo9 TO
BRI
In�OYl�iilO�6 w�110 wow
ICI= -I- =E \
NORTH ELEVATION
F.FE.
100' -O'
I PREFIN. METAL COPING
I
I
-
T.O. STUD)
�T,O BRIGI
Y 120 =0'
SOFFIT
112' -O'
FF.E.
I00'_O'
N il 5TUD
' -O"
SOUTH ELEVATION
I /B• • I' -0•
T-O. STI1D_J�
121' -8 -b•
O. BRICK
120' -O'
_ SOFFIT
113' -0�
FFE.
I -01 le
EAST ELEVATION
PREFIN. METAL COPIN6-
NEON PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
ILLUM. CLOCK
EIFS - 2 COLORS �-
INTERIOR ILLUMINATED
516NA6E
CANVAS AYLUN6-
BRICK - 2 COLORS
ANOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT--
ROCKFACE Cw BASE - 2 COLORS -
PREFIN. METAL COPIN&
NEON PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
ILLUM, CLOCK
EIFS - 2 COLORS
INTERIOR ILLUMINATED
516NA&E
CANVAS AYPIIN6
BRICK - 2 COLORS
ANOO. ALUM STOREFRONT
ROCKFACE Cw BASE - 2 COLORS
■P ■_®
IIII ®mm o
• €n�vna-ion- Illlllw
Y1 =f� ® '- ®w mmo9 TO
BRI
In�OYl�iilO�6 w�110 wow
ICI= -I- =E \
NORTH ELEVATION
F.FE.
100' -O'
i
KKE
I PREFIN. METAL COPING
T O. BRICK
-
HAUGLAN D
Nor9� Kr� ��on
Architects. Inc. nmt °°°
UN N °�
UN 55401
PROPERTY
YinneepolL+,
e,po s,
912/339 -4200
PAX 342 -9267
Na Date Revision Desaipbm
Pmjea
coFEE
CITY
SUBMITTAL —
DI:
° "12
BL
A2
SMOOTH cw
—
..............
.
SCORED Cw ACCENT BAND
ewrta,r mw 4 eowb u.a un,e, wwuv...e
CANVAS
AANIN6
ROCKFACE Cw - 2 COLORS
BRICK - 2 COLORS
ROCKFACE C.MJ BASE
LIM:
\PAINTED OVERI-EAD DOOR PAINTED H.M. DOOR
i
KKE
DEVELOPED BY:
�k Mme
HAUGLAN D
Nor9� Kr� ��on
Architects. Inc. nmt °°°
UN N °�
UN 55401
PROPERTY
YinneepolL+,
e,po s,
912/339 -4200
PAX 342 -9267
WEST ELEVATION 8' O' 4' 8' Ib' HARR uuuuu
va , ro
LONDONDERRY SHOPS
EDINA, MINNESOTA
�k Mme
ve°- iLa~
Na Date Revision Desaipbm
Pmjea
00-09- 1055-01 shoo
CITY
SUBMITTAL —
DI:
° "12
BL
A2
Dnw by
—
a
KA
ewrta,r mw 4 eowb u.a un,e, wwuv...e
, I
k'
i
TOP 897.95 / m I�
SL. _ 1. St 4 —� H TOP 895.77
--- INV.889.77
p 1 ST " ST
% N FS1 N e
TOP 897.95
INV. 894.95 S"
•e„� r
!I�
pl
/d
1
City Of EGf /17e,
Affen/re.®n C®t//lty, AffnfleSots?
LOCATION MAP:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACTS A AND 8, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
NO. 1378 HENNEPIN COUNTY MN.
GENERAL NOTES:
1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM HTPO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY, DATED
10/12/99.
2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER
HTPO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY,
DATED 10/12/99.
INDEX:
1.) MST. CONDITIONS /BOUNDARY SURVEY
Y.) PRELIM. SITE PLAN
8.) PRELIM. UTIIJTY PLAN
4.) PRELIM. CRADINC/EROSION CONTROL PLAN
5.) PRELIM. LANDSGPE PLAN
r^
i o 0
oEE?o
=E�ao
°ON
v2o$
_u2a °O�
n
i
0
2
1;
i
W
a
m
OV Oit
ON w a LL
y
0z
yo o z o
LEGEND `' \ n
A
-^ EXISTING CONTOUR
a ° C)
X - 920.8 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION Z Q Z °
a
-SS - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER C Q ^ ^m
C J'no
—WM EXISTING WATERMAIN C V 00 e W
-Sr -- EXISTING STORM SEWER 0 <81
• EXISTING FENCE -4 _ COME
SL EXISTING SIGNAL UNE
OE EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC C W g
G EXISTING GASMAIN
T EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
a.r °cam
30 0 30 60 90
Scale 1" = 30'
01/12/00
o'
H
' V• •.
rl�l
N yl
4 +
ry;
:•
A�53'1"
9 -
i TOP 911.48
INV.
908.58
i O
•e„� r
!I�
pl
/d
1
City Of EGf /17e,
Affen/re.®n C®t//lty, AffnfleSots?
LOCATION MAP:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACTS A AND 8, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
NO. 1378 HENNEPIN COUNTY MN.
GENERAL NOTES:
1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM HTPO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY, DATED
10/12/99.
2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER
HTPO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY,
DATED 10/12/99.
INDEX:
1.) MST. CONDITIONS /BOUNDARY SURVEY
Y.) PRELIM. SITE PLAN
8.) PRELIM. UTIIJTY PLAN
4.) PRELIM. CRADINC/EROSION CONTROL PLAN
5.) PRELIM. LANDSGPE PLAN
r^
i o 0
oEE?o
=E�ao
°ON
v2o$
_u2a °O�
n
i
0
2
1;
i
W
a
m
OV Oit
ON w a LL
y
0z
yo o z o
LEGEND `' \ n
A
-^ EXISTING CONTOUR
a ° C)
X - 920.8 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION Z Q Z °
a
-SS - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER C Q ^ ^m
C J'no
—WM EXISTING WATERMAIN C V 00 e W
-Sr -- EXISTING STORM SEWER 0 <81
• EXISTING FENCE -4 _ COME
SL EXISTING SIGNAL UNE
OE EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC C W g
G EXISTING GASMAIN
T EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
a.r °cam
30 0 30 60 90
Scale 1" = 30'
01/12/00
1
,I
I ,
1/
I'' I
�( I
Ii I
�rl �
i/r I
i
J r '
EMPLOYEE `
.PARKING l�
STALLS
1' � i I•ll
II
i
I� II
1
II
II
— -- POSSIBLE
FUTURE
.. .. ._ .. ._ .. .. .. ,. .. _. IMPROVEMENTS
POSSIBLE \� "�,; 1' I• �-
I ONC. o FUTURE
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
�•a 1 I� I co a I \•�, v ",1� I II I 1
`/r o CONIC.
CURB B GUTTER 1 1 }7 I4 I
!/ R �: o; � /)' - -,�, j;��..,'•� - ` f I� !� � ill
j n, Jr f!
Ifl
ryP�
7QO 00
CY
,44 DO
o <;
6" 1 Distance to Cenledine Variable
1/2-R-\ 3'R
1 1/2•R
DENOTES 'ry a sow s /4•
ROAD Par R
IMPROVEMENT � L� r,
m
I
CONCRETE CURB DETAIL
MnDOT 86 -12
NOTE,
OPIace t 4 Bar As Shown Where Curb
Crosses Utility Trenches, With 1 -1/2'
Cover.
rl. EG± Ill!�6EF.
AL E nr
CI& Of Easing a
Hennepin County, fifennesute
5
4
u
1
SITE DATA:
m °9ae
S0. F7.2
ACRES 1
E
TOTAL SITE AREA
76,420
1.75
2
TOTAL BUILDING AREA
10 "800
0.25
` E o cc
701AL PARKING AREA :
37,189
0.85
T07AL SIDEWALK /PLAZA AREA:
1,378
0.03
S -W e
T07AL GREEN SPACE AREA
27,053
0.62
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
49,367
1.13
- o
T07AL BUILDING COVERAGE
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
14.13%
:
65.60%
LTaa«
a `o
;o�
ho
ame
a
LEGEND
X - 920.8
_SS
- wm
57
SL
OE
c
T
tttttttetetttelttt
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAJN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING SIGNAL LINE
EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING GASMAIN
EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
PROPOSED SAN17ARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EROSION CONTROL BARRIER
i
i
a 288
oo$n
o�g
o.
_�
Q uOjl
�$wa�
to
t� z0
T/I� Qo
a
0,;
0 i n
p2 oee.
Z o
-j
4wG&K.-
c90 gW
y4 =miia
2
01/12/00
-S —SL
zy
TOP 909 86
INV. 905.96 0
j."
If
1 /61
ll
itl
..
/jr% , I p I\
906
TOP 911.59
INV. 907.69V
I-P e95.n
___ - -___ ( INV-8819.77
ST ST
TOP 8117,95
INV. 894.95
EXIST. SAN.—
SEWER STUB
S" SEWER ULA PROPOSED
V.C. OR*.: 12 R.C.P.
PRC,. OR EOUIV. SEWER
CATCH BASIN OP 895.04
rr
/5/
/ A
�rj �f / /
ii // It/
JV'
%
LL
al
Do
V.
898.96
Vk.
TOP 901.8
INV. 897.5
2
2
FA
0AFOOMAVERRIr SHOPS
c1ty Of Ec fina
liefifle.0h7 C01110y, fifilMeSOM
LEGEND
X = 920.8
_SS —
wM -
-S7 —
— SL-
-OE
—G-
-T—
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING SIGNAL LINE
EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING GASMAIN
EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
z
E
i � qz
26
F
F
L9
vi e
10
>t
0:
04
5.
-Ex
2v m.
—
—17
3
01 /12/00
PRQPOSED�,6- D.I.P. WATERk
jl
'-'RE- LOCATE
EXIST. HYD..
TIE INTO EXIST
6' D.I.P.'
WATERMAIN
STUB
/5/
/ A
�rj �f / /
ii // It/
JV'
%
LL
al
Do
V.
898.96
Vk.
TOP 901.8
INV. 897.5
2
2
FA
0AFOOMAVERRIr SHOPS
c1ty Of Ec fina
liefifle.0h7 C01110y, fifilMeSOM
LEGEND
X = 920.8
_SS —
wM -
-S7 —
— SL-
-OE
—G-
-T—
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING SIGNAL LINE
EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING GASMAIN
EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
z
E
i � qz
26
F
F
L9
vi e
10
>t
0:
04
5.
-Ex
2v m.
—
—17
3
01 /12/00
a
r
�r
r4
h �I
�1rlr 1,
y 1,
�M
y r�/ r /rn
< ho
y
r ° I
6 �
r
I�
. _ __—VST v ST s>
i
I:
o \ .
'Poe
� • G =898.5
I c _
�r
O
LONADONA EPPY SHOPS
c F
1,
Cfty Of Etyma
_
`s
5
Ifenne fn County, A fnnesota
r
v ~4'
0 0
rn
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
1
q
o n
1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM HTPO
O
4.
4
2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER
J:
1A
�_.it,
SS NA
I
II N�II
r
l rl I
.r PARKING LOT TO BE USED FOR
PONDING IN A HEAVY RAIN EVENT.
f I STORAGE AVAILABLE - 0.16 AC. FT.
r I r rl l
PROPOSED
' SILT FENCE
(TYPICAL)
hS !r
,,'�\.y� i ROCK
or
ENTRANCE
F'/
Ir � uy i
I; r
`il I
f .d
ELEV. = 898.5 - 900.0
OVERFLOW OVER BERM AT 900.0
100 TR. ELEV. = 900.0
Steel or Wood Post
Filter Fabric
Securely
Fastened to Post �
Loy FaMic In Trench -I
i 30' Nm. Height
1 I
Undisturbed
Shc
Dig 6' :6' Trench
Along Fence Line.
Backni Over The
Top of Fabric and
Compact the Sal
Min. Depth
SILT FENCE TYPICAL
No Scala
6'MINIMUM
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
Na Sw.
LEGEND
X = 920.6
SS
ST
SL
OE
G
r
//ilI14"ff Ill
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERAIAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING SIGNAL LINE
EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING GASMAIN
EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
30 0 30 60 90
Scale 1" = 30'
2
Vno
a2�nmo
O V�FNe
S
VZ3vh
a.
2 rnazv
°oax °O<
rNwatL
4
0
a
40
O V }o
a
V so
�o =
V 21r°pi '3a
N S
4 �
4
01/12/00
FAG£_' IPEF
LONADONA EPPY SHOPS
c F
Cfty Of Etyma
_
`s
5
Ifenne fn County, A fnnesota
3
�3
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM HTPO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY, DATED
10/12/99.
2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER
HTPO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
DATED 10/12/99.
3.) ALL DENUDED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE STREET RIGHT OR WAY SHALL BE
«
REVEGETATED WITHIN 72 HOURS AFTER FINAL GRADING .
r
SEED WITH MNDOT 600 (6) SPECIFICATION MIXTURE BY JUNE 15TH. IF
�
PLANTING OCCURS AFTER AUGUST 15TH, SEED WITH A NURSE CROP OF
> >, d
^
RYE BY OCTOBER 5TH. IF PLANTING HAS NOT OCCURED BY OCTOBER 5TH,
THEN DORMANT SEED THE SITE AFTER NOVEMBER 1.
- •
STRAW MULCH SMALL BE SPREAD AT THE RATE OF 1 1/2 TONS PER ACRE
° ° o �=
d
AND ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT, SERRATED BLADE DISC.
t
AVAILABLE TOP SOIL SHALL BE SPREAD TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4
-Wd
INCHES OUTSIDE HOUSE PAD .AREAS AND 2 INCHES WMTH!N HOUSE PADS.
-
c
REFER TO THE GRADING MANUAL FOR CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
ALL AREAS ALTERED BECAUSE OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RESTORED NTH
a
d
SEED AND DISCED MULCH, SOD OR WOOD FIBER BLANKETS.
AREAS ALTERED WITH A SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER MUST BE RESTORED
WITH SOD OR FIBER BLANKETS.
a,•
Steel or Wood Post
Filter Fabric
Securely
Fastened to Post �
Loy FaMic In Trench -I
i 30' Nm. Height
1 I
Undisturbed
Shc
Dig 6' :6' Trench
Along Fence Line.
Backni Over The
Top of Fabric and
Compact the Sal
Min. Depth
SILT FENCE TYPICAL
No Scala
6'MINIMUM
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
Na Sw.
LEGEND
X = 920.6
SS
ST
SL
OE
G
r
//ilI14"ff Ill
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERAIAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING SIGNAL LINE
EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING GASMAIN
EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
30 0 30 60 90
Scale 1" = 30'
2
Vno
a2�nmo
O V�FNe
S
VZ3vh
a.
2 rnazv
°oax °O<
rNwatL
4
0
a
40
O V }o
a
V so
�o =
V 21r°pi '3a
N S
4 �
4
01/12/00
t
A..
I ,
•J /� /% /% t
!1 !
q
Ji
WMA
1, o
qo EcnuualWNd �.
Lf6f V:NAAf Of PROXC5
i
I /
1�
li
51'N.
Lt,XWIgJ
ITY
wfaxk WN
(.O!.LVON 1, %W
5ff
ON.
07171'
e.act canditlons of the site.
2. Locate
�mm
xoa.ars ,l"
a
� xwxsnvuw
rxx IIEIX� n!r
�• cur.
m
WATERMAIN
4. All disturbed areas rill be planted or sodded and will be
xL
°m,s. mrw ,Nm Ixpl r5
Noxn msr
�• cur.
m
sa
R ��ous
B6
PQ a . DD6 TA
mwor nus sRRnCE
a M.
N
OR
0
r
SIIAleS
w
l5
—s NOtDZON1K5 1.Ii1rY
a— .w'oNiu • N rxxn�Y
MU016 —PM
aax�lI��
3 k
all
C,
Rr-
RDCa/A RdZM 9m PRxOE•
JrllE GP.iQ13 sR,laA
qID AL1Q eDWA
J axl
•
OOSneIC
,RE6
11
�/ BB m OM '11 1 YID I%AL Pm•VEOIFN
C.e moms -W ,Mm =rimi- SPm vc
r
r/
Planting Notes
e.act canditlons of the site.
2. Locate
b�!
I
jl r
all utBilies
i 61ack diamond or equal poly Iorn edging shall be used
efty Of Edina
Hennepin Counts, fifinnesotn
CAPPED 1' STACK FOR USE
u r at locations be
- CURB STOP
va rfied ond adjusted as equired to conform to the
e.act canditlons of the site.
2. Locate
b�!
I
jl r
all utBilies
i 61ack diamond or equal poly Iorn edging shall be used
around all planting beds.
WATERMAIN
4. All disturbed areas rill be planted or sodded and will be
Irrigated.
NI 1
� it r
r
efty Of Edina
Hennepin Counts, fifinnesotn
CAPPED 1' STACK FOR USE
TO WINTERIZE (DRAIN) LINE
- CURB STOP
CAP
SURFACE GRADE
n
2' IRR.LEAD
WATERMAIN
IRRIGATION CONNECTION
No smb
I F�JAC' uJr2:F.
9 "MS
L -- . \
– r--� ruraxcr>a na.kw, �
v o eru mu r -r
7. "-
n..mCwaam
acv�er. rnarr �L
51W PLAN q% PETAL
idsl�IVe xxu � �
rueeraneNC.xsand n S
/ nasrmr ?
1. as bxts7NawkD W
p W O
rW Wr,e17 u]
Y O
Iet5LM7f M1OYY O Z
). M fuHYN 2RID
.. ra.u54avrc RGlGle V 2 �"v)
2aiw�
vxwc5nu aan u � °o i °x <
l���r+m xwWOwor xlnl �
r'J'O sil Ad I "? B
m \ RV.,nBfD Q/Q g
rN6mQNt
�-- MIN Sa.enru _
TREE FLAMM ITTA9. �_ NR rJ 2L 45M f0. Q
u.s,r Q
e
rO 0J
`
�1 thtyy
~
Ooh l
e e "m
ti
A,7 �o
N4<2 F,
n
F
acnan
am xuxmr
30 0 30 so go 5
MORP
l I
Scale 1" = 30'
01/12/00
,3
1` 4
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item:
III. B.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
City Planner
Information Only
❑
Date:
February 15, 2000
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Final Development Plan &
Action
❑
Motion
Conditional Use Permit for
®
Resolution
Fairview Southdale Hospital
❑
Ordinance
6400 and 6401 France Ave.
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Final Development Plan
for hospital expansion and the Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking
structure at 6400 France Avenue subject to the following conditions:
1. Watershed District permits.
2. Hospital participation in street and intersection improvements set out in the
traffic impact analysis section of the EAW.
3. Redesign of ring route and parking areas west of the addition ( to be
reviewed by staff).
Info /Background:
Following the Planning Commission meeting Planning and Engineering staff met
with hospital representatives to consider site plan changes which would reduce hard
surface and add additional landscaped area along the France Avenue side of the
hospital. As a result of those discussions a revised site plan and landscaping plan
have been submitted. The revised plan eliminates the separate parking and ring route
areas west of the building, reduces parking and hardsurface area while providing
additional landscaped areas. The parking area west of the building will be used
primarily for handicapped parking. The parking north of the building will continue to be
Page 2
fq Agenda Item III. A.
short term physician parking. Staff believes the changes represent a significant
improvement and recommends approval of the change.
Partially in consideration for the site plan changes, the hospital is requesting
consideration of a slightly larger parking ramp. The expanded ramp would increase
capacity from 984 stalls to 1,137 stalls. The expansion would occur on the west side of
the structure. This expansion would meet setbacks and not require a variance. The
additional spaces would replace those lost through the redesign of the site plan, and
would provide a cushion to handle occasional peak demand times for the hospital and
clinic. The expanded ramp would remain at four levels. Staff recommends approval of
the revised ramp plans.
f`
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 26,
2000
P -00 -1 Fairview Southdale Hospital
6401 France Avenue South, Edina, MN
Request: Final Development Plan for hospital expansion and
Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking
ramp at 6400 France Avenue South
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Fairview Southdale hospital is
seeking approval for an expansion that includes. remodeling existing space, .
expanding outpatient services, additional medical office space, and construction
of structured parking on the existing surface parking lot west of France Avenue.
The expansion would occur in three phases. Phase I would be a single story
with lower level addition to the west side of the building. Phase II would further
expand the first floor, would add three levels of medical office space (MOB)
above the addition, would construct a 984 space parking structure west of
France Avenue which would be connected to the hospital by a skyway over
France. Phase III would reorient the hospital's main entrance from the north to
the west side and complete the interior remodeling.
The proposed 4 level, 984 space parking structure requires 2 setback
variances. The first is along the north property line which is the right of way for
the Crosstown highway. The ramp has been pushed as far north as possible to
maximize the setback from 65th Street. As a result a 32 foot setback variance is
requested which is equal to the height of the ramp. The second variance occurs
at the southwesterly corner of the ramp where a 4 foot setback variance is
requested. The ramp provides a 31 foot setback where 35 feet is required.
Mr. Larsen explained when all 3 phases of the hospital expansion are
complete the Floor Area Ratio for the site will be 1.06 which exceeds the
maximum FAR of 1.0 for the Regional Medical District. This ultimate FAR,
however, does not take into account the property west of France owned by the
hospital (the parking ramp property). If given credit for this property the FAR
would drop to 0.88 and would not require a.variance. The relocated ring road
along the west and north sides of the building comes within 3 feet of the property
line on the north side and within 5 feet along the west side of the building. The
required setback is 20 feet. Thus, a 17 foot parking setback variance is
required. The ring road is necessary because the hospital intends to limit
access to the parking areas to the west and north of the building.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the Zoning Ordinance bases parking requirements
for hospitals on the number of beds and employees. We have found this
standard does not work to evaluate parking demand for a modern hospital
campus. Rather we have relied on parking counts and the experience at other
suburban hospitals to determine how much parking is needed. This method has
worked well. The hospital's parking consultant estimates a overall demand of 5
spaces per 1,000 square feet for the completed project. The proposed ramp
would provide parking adequate to meet expected demand. According to the
analysis existing parking is adequate to meet Phase I demand.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the traffic impact of the proposed
development is addressed in the attached Traffic Impact Study prepared by
BRW, Inc. The study is attached for Commission review. The study has been
reviewed by the City Engineer. Recommendations for area improvements are
detailed on page 30 of the report. Improvements to Drew Avenue should occur
coincident with Phase I, while improvements west of France should occur when
the ramp is built in Phase II.
Mr. Larsen stated Fairview Southdale is a community asset that provides
vital services to the community and region. Staff believes it is essential that the
hospital have the flexibility to react and change as the delivery of health care
evolves. Acquiring the site west of France Avenue allows the hospital this
flexibility. Construction of the skyway will allow the two sites to function as one.
Traffic is, and will continue to be an issue in this area. Proposed improvements
in the Traffic Study are consistent with the city's master planning for the area.
Staff recommends approval of the 3 phase plan for the expansion and
remodeling, and also recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for
the 4 level ramp conditioned on:
1. Permits from 9 Mile Creek Watershed District
2. Hospital participation in street and intersection improvements as set
out in the Traffic Impact Study
3. Refer ring road design to staff to examine possible modification which
could occur with Phase II of the project
Mr. Mark Enger, Mr. Daniel Weber were present representing Fairview
Southdale Hospital. Mr. Richard Dahl was present representing BWBR
Architects, and Mr. Howard Preston of BRW was present.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen why 6400 France Avenue
(site of proposed ramp) requires a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Larsen explained
the site is zoned APD, Automobile Parking District, and constructing a ramp in
an APD zone requires a Conditional Use Permit.
r-i
Commissioner McClelland commented that she has some concern that in
the future the ramp could be sold to a separate party. Mr. Larsen responded
once the ramp is physically connected to the hospital via the skyway that
concern would not be an issue.
Commissioner Swenson noted Phase I is aggressive and eliminates
parking during the construction phase. She asked if staff believes parking
demands will be met during the construction process. Mr. Larsen agreed that
providing adequate parking will be a balancing act, adding he believes during
the construction period parking will be adequate. Commissioner Swenson
suggested that the parking ramp structure be constructed first, thereby providing
parking during construction phases.
Mr. Mark Enger addressed the Commission and informed them Fairview
Southdale Hospital (FSH) is 35 years old, has experienced many changes, and
is committed to the City of Edina and the community. Mr. Enger said the main
site isl 5 acres, and was donated to FSH by the Dayton family for health care to
the community. Mr. Enger told the Commission for the past three years FSH has
looked at numerous expansion scenarios, and believes the plan before the
Commission this evening fulfills the hospitals and communities needs. Mr.
Enger said FSH is now operating at its maximum capacity due to the growth of
the southwest suburbs, and FSH needs to meet the demands of the community.
Mr. Enger explained the proposed campus expansion will be
accomplished in three phases, and it is the goal of the hospital to accomplish the
three phases with as little disruption as possible. Mr. Enger introduced to the
Commission, Mr. Daniel Weber also of FSH.
Mr. Weber informed the Commission the goal of the hospital is to orient
the hospital toward the west, France Avenue. He said the front entrance for the
hospital will be moved from the north to the west taking full advantage of France
Avenue. Mr. Weber added new landscaping.will be incorporated on site and a
"green area" will be developed on the first floor allowing visitors and patients to
enjoy the outdoors. Mr. Weber also noted the hospital will be creating quasi -
public spaces that the hospital intends to offer the community for use. Mr.
Weber said the hospital wants to develop a strong purpose of campus. Mr.
Weber introduced Mr. Rick Dahl, architect for the project to further explain the
proposal.
Mr. Dahl told the Commission the goal of the project is to create a
recognized campus that is approachable and flexible. Mr. Dahl added the
project is also cost effective, and re- enforces the sense of campus. Continuing,
Mr. Dahl said the master plan will include; clinical components and support
spaces, educational facilities, quasi - public spaces, medical office building,
parking ramp and a skyway spanning France Avenue. Mr. Dahl said the master
plan is proposed to be implemented over the course of three phases.
Mr. Dahl explained Phase I is proposed to begin in the spring of 2000 and
completed by the winter of 2002. Phase I will include 74,000 square feet of
expansion which will occur on the first and lower levels. Phase I also includes
52,000 square feet of remodeling on the first floor. Phase I will include the heart
center, including a cardiology suite of seven procedure rooms. Surgery facilities
are also expanded by adding eight Ors and MRI is being relocated adjacent to
the Emergency Department. Phase II adds the medical mall, parking ramp and
skyway. This phase is targeted to begin in the spring of 2001 and end in the
winter of 2002. Mr. Dahl said Phase III includes the completion of the medical
mall, expansion of the post- operative recover area, a 20 foot wide lower level
concourse will be created to route public traffic from the new outpatient
entrance. Construction of Phase III is anticipated to being in the spring of 2002
and completed in the fall of 2003. Concluding Mr. Dahl explained the building
design will be respectful of the existing hospital, and the proposed materials for
expansion include brick to match the existing building, precast concrete, and
green marble. Similar materials will be used on the proposed skyway and
parking ramp.
Mr. Enger told the Commission traffic is a concern in the area, and the
hospital is working with City staff on signage to aid in the better flow of traffic,
and to divert some traffic to Valley View Road. Mr. Enger said there will be
some temporary parking inconveniences that the hospital hopes to mitigate by
providing shuttle services for staff and temporary parking solutions.
Chairman Johnson questioned if the bulk of patient and visitor parking will
be located in the proposed new ramp west of France Avenue and will the
existing ramp be used by staff. Mr. Enger responded the existing ramp will be
used by tenants and patients of the existing medical office building. Mr. Enger
said he believes the vast majority of staff will park in the new parking structure.
Chairman Johnson said the last time the hospital came before the
Commission there was some talk about West 65th Street and Drew Avenue.
Chairman Johnson questioned what happened to that plan. Mr. Enger said a
previous option of the hospital was an expansion that included the closure and
re- routing West 65th Street. Mr. Enger said that scenario has died. Mr. Enger
introduced Mr. Howard Preston of BRW.
Mr. Preston said as part of the traffic study BRW conducted a technical
analysis of what is occurring now, and what will occur in the future. Mr. Preston
said he has worked closely with Mr. Hoffman from the City's Engineering
Department, and has suggested that Drew Avenue be widened from 66' Street
to 65th Street to accommodate traffic.
Chairman Johnson asked if there has been any discussion between the
hospital and the neighborhood. Mr. Preston said prior to the change in
scenarios BRW conducted a vehicle trace survey in the area. This survey
indicated that much of the traffic on West 65" Street appeared to be destined for
the hospital. Mr. Preston said it has been their goal to focus traffic coming to
and going from the hospital to West 66th Street and Drew Avenue.
Mr. Enger, interjected and told the Commission FSH has held two
community forums inviting the neighbors giving them an opportunity to discuss
the proposed expansion, and in addition the hospital has kept in contact with
Pacey Irk, Chair of the Colony Association. Mr. Enger said at this time there
appears to be no issues.
Chairman Johnson stated traffic on Valley View Road coming west from
the proposed ramp concerns him. He pointed out Valley View Road is 300 to
400 feet from the ramp, and if a vehicle turns right onto Valley View Road, and
turns left onto Crosstown a stacking problem will occur. Chairman Johnson
noted it is already difficult to get onto Crosstown. Mr. Preston, said FSH is
looking into the possibility of creating signalization at the south and north ramp
terminals. Mr. Preston said it is hoped this will assist vehicles in getting from
65th onto Valley View Road going north and turning west onto the Crosstown.
Mr. Preston added congestion on the Crosstown highway is beyond the scope of
the hospital. Chairman Johnson stated during certain hours one can't get on the
Crosstown ramp. Continuing, Chairman Johnson said he has a concern
especially during rush hour that travelers will figure out a way to wind through
the neighborhood and pick up north bound 100 at Benton Avenue. Mr. Preston
agreed that is a possibility. Mr. Enger interjected it is difficult to define when
rush hours starts and stops, adding hospital shift changes are during different
hours, and it is our hope that the staggered time frame distributes traffic. Mr.
Enger said the hospital shares the same concerns regarding traffic. He stated it
is important to the hospital that patients and visitors gain easy access to the
campus. Mr. Enger concluded hospital staff is very interested in working with
the City, County and State, to resolve traffic issues, reiterating finding solutions
is very important to FSH and the community.
Commissioner Swenson questioned Mr. Hoffman if it is possible to put a
traffic light at the bottom of the Valley View Road exit from Crosstown Highway.
Mr. Hoffman said that can be accomplished, adding there is a plan to construct
three lanes at this point because the exit lane is so short merging into flowing
traffic with so many turns required to gain access to France Avenue..
Commissioner Swenson said she also has a concern with the ramp entrance
from Valley View Road traveling westbound on Crosstown Highway: She said it
is difficult to excelerate fast enough because the merge lane is so short. Mr.
Hoffman said he agrees with that observation, and explained there is an idea
using additional land to making the merging easier.
Commissioner McClelland said she noticed the hospital has stressed it is
a non for profit organization, and pointed out when the hospital requested the
office building and ramp in the NE corner of the campus it was felt at that time
that that would be the last expansion to the campus. Mr. Enger explained BTO,
owner of the medical office building is not a non profit organization. He said
they are for profit and pay property taxes, and will continue to pay taxes on the
existing building, and the proposed new office suites. Continuing, Mr. Enger
pointed out the demand for medical facilities has increased during the last
decade which can be noted in the occupancy rates of medical facilities along
France Avenue. Mr. Enger said he cannot address what occurred before he
came to FSH, and how the hospital presented itself at that time, but believes this
expansion is needed and is an asset to the community.
Commissioner McClelland questioned Mr. Enger on the temporary
structure variance the hospital requested in December. Mr. Enger said at this
time FSH is considering other options. It was found that the cost of the
temporary structure exceeds the budget of the hospital.
Mr. Dahl interjected he was present at the December Zoning Board
hearing and explained as designed the temporary structure would be required to
conform to building codes and cost became a factor. Concluding, Mr. Dahl said
they are in the process of discussing other temporary options.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Enger is he knows the percentage
breakdown of residents that use the hospital and It's campus facilities. Mr.
Enger explained FSH encompasses the SW metro area, which includes Edina,
parts of southwest Minneapolis, Bloomington, and Richfield. Mr. Enger said that
percentage is roughly 85 %. 15% comes from other regions.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen the difference between Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) and lot coverage. Mr. Larsen explained lot coverage (building
footprint coverage) calculations are used in the residential districts. FAR, is used
in commercial and other zones and measures the gross floor area divided by the
lot area. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he knows of any areas in
the City where the FAR is as intense. Mr. Larsen said many of our commercial
zones are at the maximum FAR. Mr. Larsen explained what is different in this
situation is that France Avenue divides the campus creating a situation where
the property west of France Avenue cannot be used in FAR calculations, even if
it is owned by the hospital and considered part of the campus.
S4
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he has a concern about
setting a FAR precedent. Mr. Larsen said by law variances are not precedent
setting, they are always unique to each site.
Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Larsen if he is aware of future
development plans on the Southdale Medical Building site. Mr. Larsen said that
is a real possibility. He added the traffic analysis was required to assume an
addition will occur on that site.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if City Code allows skyways.
Mr. Larsen said skyways are not addressed in the code. Continuing, Mr. Larsen
said France Avenue is a County road and the County has indicated they have no
problem with the proposed skyway as long as it meets height requirements.
Commissioner Lonsbury questioned if any code modifications should occur
regarding skyways. Mr. Larsen stated that is worth thinking about, adding at the
present time he does not believe there is another skyway imminent.
Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Final Development Plan and
Conditional Use approval, subject to: permits from the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District; hospital participation in street and intersection improvements
as set out in the Traffic Impact Study; refer ring road design to staff to examine
possible modification which could occur with Phase II of the project, and subject
to variance approval as they relate to the parking ramp and ring road.
Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion.
Chairman Johnson asked Commissioner's Byron and Bergman if they
would accept an amendment to the motion that would include the further study
and discussion of Drew Avenue and its intersections. Commissioner's Byron
and Bergman accepted the amendment. All voted aye; motion carried.
16
lUlloyll 9 1-01 z M. i i Is\M
T.
Wil W ol -.��AZI- W el'tJ
WAWA
w
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 26, 2000
STAFF REPORT
P -00 -1 Fairview Southdale Hospital
6401 France Avenue South, Edina, MN
Request: Final Development Plan for hospital expansion and
Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking
ramp at 6400 France Avenue South
Fairview Southdale hospital is seeking approval for an expansion which
includes remodeling existing space, expanding outpatient services, additional
medical office space, and construction of structured parking on the existing
surface parking lot west of France Avenue. The expansion would occur in three
phases. Phase I would be a single . story with lower level addition to the west
side of the building. Phase II would further expand the first floor, would add
three levels of medical office space (MOB) above the addition, would construct a
984 space parking structure west of France Avenue which would be connected
to the hospital by a skyway over France. Phase III would reorient the hospital's
main entrance from the north to the west side and complete the interior
remodeling. A complete description of the individual phases is attached.
ZONING COMPLIANCE
The proposed 4 level, 984 space parking structure requires 2 setback
variances. The first is along the north property line which is the right of way for
the Crosstown highway. The ramp has been pushed as far north as possible to
maximize the setback from 65th Street. As a result a 32 foot setback variance is
requested which is equal to the height of the ramp. The second variance occurs
at the southwesterly corner of the ramp where a 4 foot setback variance is
requested. The ramp provides a 31 foot setback where 35 feet is required.
When all 3 phases of the hospital expansion are complete the'Floor Area
Ratio for the site will be 1.06 which exceeds the maximum FAR of 1.0 for the
Regional Medical District. This ultimate FAR, however, does not take into
account the property west of France owned by the hospital (the parking ramp
property). If given credit for this property the FAR. would drop to 0.88 and would
not require a variance. The relocated ring road along the west and north sides
1
of the building comes within 3 feet of the property, line on the north side and
within 5 feet along the west side of the building. The required setback is 20 feet.
Thus, a 17 foot parking setback variance is required. The ring road is necessary
because the hospital intends to limit access to the parking areas to. the west and
north of the building.
PARKING
The Zoning Ordinance bases parking requirements for hospitals on the
number of beds and employees. We have found this standard does not work to
evaluate parking demand for a modern hospital campus. Rather we have relied
on parking counts and the experience at other suburban hospitals to determine
how much parking is needed. This method has worked well. The hospital's
parking consultant estimates a overall demand of 5. spaces per 1,000 square
feet for the completed project. The proposed ramp would provide parking
adequate to meet expected demand. According to the analysis existing parking
is adequate to meet Phase I demand.
TRAFFIC
The traffic impact of the proposed development is addressed in the
attached Traffic Impact Study prepared by BRW, Inc. The study is attached for
Commission review. The study has been reviewed by the City Engineer.
Recommendations for area improvements are detailed on page 30 of the report.
Improvements to Drew Avenue should occur coincident with Phase I, while
improvements west of France should occur when the ramp is built in Phase II.
RECOMMENDATION
Fairview Southdale is a community asset that provides vital services to
the community and region. Staff believes it is essential that the hospital have
the flexibility to react and change as the delivery of health care evolves.
Acquiring the site west of France Avenue allows the hospital this flexibility.
Construction of the skyway will allow the two sites to function as one. Traffic is,
and will continue to be an issue in this area. Proposed improvements in the
Traffic Study are consistent with the city's master planning for the area. Staff
recommends approval of the 3 phase plan for the expansion and remodeling,
and also recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the 4 level
ramp conditioned on:
1. Permits from 9 Mile Creek Watershed District
2. Hospital participation in street and intersection improvements .as set
out in the Traffic Impact Study
1 Refer ring road design to staff to examine possible modification which
could occur with Phase 11 of the project
BWBR Architects February 10, 2000
Mr. Craig Larson
Planning and Development
City of Edina
4801 West 50`h Street
• Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Architecture . Interior Design Re: Submittal for Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion
BWBR Commission Number 99101.00
Dear Craig:
Thank you for meeting with us Friday, February 4. We genuinely feel the comments
that you and Fran shared will result in an improved project. Attached are updated
drawings reflecting these revisions.
Specifically, we will reduce the amount of asphalt and increase the amount of
greenspace and landscaping on the west side of the building by taking the following
measures:
• Compress the expansion footprint by holding the building edge as far east as
is viable;
• Eliminate one drive lane by combining the ring road and parking zone on the
west side of the expansion;
• For safety purposes, limit parking to the inboard side of the ring road on the
west side of the expansion;
• Reduce the amount of on -site congestion by limiting parking on the west
side of the expansion to handicapped stalls;
• Keep the access controlled parking area at the north side of the building.
400 Sibley Street. Suite 500
St. Paul. Minnesota 55101
651.222.3701
fax 651:222.8961
wxvw.bwbr.com
These revisions provide a much more generous planting area facing France Avenue.
As you know, this does result in displacement of some of the parking spaces
included in our original submittal. In order to provide the needed parking to support
the building addition, we'll have to recapture those displaced stalls elsewhere on the
site. The location west of the proposed parking ramp makes available these needed
stalls, and does this by:
• Providing the option for 153 additional stalls (1,137 stalls total in a Phase I -
4 level ramp);
• Creating a parking buffer to accommodate unanticipated peak periods (for
example, when public events take place at the facility);
• Maximizing site utilization;
• Realizing the cost - effectiveness of building more ramp while the
construction crew is mobilized;
• Providing parking to allow for possible build -out of some Phase I shell
space;
• Fully complying with all setbacks (no additional variances required).
Craig, we hope you agree these revisions address the concerns raised by you and
Fran. We appreciate the opportunity to work these issues through with you. Please
call me (651- 290 -1926) if I can answer any questions for you.
Sincerely,
BWBR Architects
Rick Dahl, AIA
Cc: Daniel Weber, Fairview Southdale Hospital
Dave Fashant, Fairview Southdale Hospital
Allen Hill, BTO Development
Bob Kost, BRW
Enc: Site Plan
Landscape Plan (under separate cover)
10 February, 2000 BWBR Architects, Inc. 02- 08- 00- c- larson.doc
a
7000 West Shore Drive
Edina MN 55435 -4039
6 February 2000
Mr. Michael Enger
Fairview Southdale Hospital
Mr. Craig Larson
Planner, City of Edina
The Honorable Dennis Maetzold
Mayor, City of Edina
City Council Members
City of Edina
Dear Sirs and Madam:
We are pleased to learn of the new expansion of Fairview Southdale Hospital. However,
we have a concern about the new construction.
One part of the existing complex that now faces west is made of a curved glass wall.
Except in winter, during the late afternoon and evening, the sun shines onto that wall and
is reflected back into the eyes of the drivers on Highway 62. With the parabolic shape of
the building, sometimes the sunlight is focused to a point and is reflected back with such
intensity that it causes the driver to be unable to focus on traffic because of the blinding
light in the eyes.
This has caused us both difficulties while driving. However, there has seemed to be
nothing we could do about it. Now, with the plans for new construction being
formulated, we respectfully ask you to carefully consider the construction materials and
design so as not to repeat the mistake. Perhaps the answer is a non -curved building.
Perhaps it is to angle the building so it faces north, away from the sun. Perhaps it is to
use a type of glass that has anti - reflection properties. Please do not ignore the impact this
construction may have on highway drivers.
Thank you for considering our ideas.
Shellie Specter
Sincerely,
Robert Davidson
I
A
Fairview Southdale Medical Campus
Expansion and Renovation Project
BWBR Commission Number 99101.01
January 12, 1999
PROJECT NARRATIVE
INTRODUCTION
It is with strong conviction, great enthusiasm, and community spirit that Fairview Southdale Hospital
respectfully submits this Master Plan to the City of Edina for its consideration.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT /SERVICE ISSUES
Overview
Fairview Southdale Hospital's campus provides an important acute care capability to the southwestern
suburbs, and is a major distribution point for a wide range of hospital- based, ambulatory services. This
campus serves as a health care destination point for the 800,000 residents of its primary service area. The
hospital serves as a vitally important distribution point for the not - for - profit Fairview System and,
through its comprehensive array of services, serves as the health care provider of choice in its community.
In order to remain the provider of choice in the southwestern suburbs, increase access to its services
(capacity, user friendly delivery systems), and to significantly enhance service quality, Fairview has
elected to make a considerable reinvestment in this facility. This plan will serve continued strong market
demand, provide the platform for long -term campus development and growth, and generate strong
financial returns to the system.
Fairview Southdale is operating at maximum capacity. For example, its surgical rooms are operating at a
93% utilization rate, which is not sustainable over time. However, while operating at maximum capacity
in its variety of services, Fairview Southdale is a respected health care provider. Demand is high because
of the community's trust in the quality of care that is provided. As the city's largest employer and again
recently named to the Top 100 Regional Hospitals list, it is cognizant of its role as a leader in the
community and region.
This plan has been developed with the needs of our neighbors in mind. We intend to offer attractive and
accessible meeting and gathering spaces to the public and community groups. We hope to attract
convenience retail vendors that will make a- family's multiple -hour stay during a loved one's procedure
more comfortable. Our skyway crossing will offer safe passage across France Avenue to pedestrians and
visitors of all ages.
This plan meets the needs of patients, the community, physicians, and employees as we strive for a
healthier future.
Campus and Facilities Functional Deficiencies
0 FSH site is undersized and irregularly shaped, resulting in a vertical orientation and on -site
congestion. The main site, donated to Fairview by the Dayton family for health care to the
community, is on approximately 15 acres, is largely landlocked.
Page I of 7
GA9910100\AdminVV1emo\Report to Edina.doc
01/12/2000
11
• Vehicular access to and on the site is difficult, confusing and congested.
Vehicular traffic flows provide a significant barrier to access for patients.
• Based on the mix of programs, services, and current and projected volumes (marginal increases), the
hospital needs additional space consistent with the programmatic needs, as well as renovation of
major departments.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Coals
Fairview Southdale Hospital, a non- profit organization, has established that the goal of this project is to
create a world -class health care campus for its stakeholders. Stakeholders are identified as:
• Patients, family and visitors
• Fairview board and business administrators
• Medical staff and employees
• Other business partners
• Our neighbors, Edina, and the broader community.
Several key driving principles have emerged in guiding project development:
• Create a place recognized for its proactive health and wellness, not just a place where the sick go
to get better.
• The facility must be accessible and approachable by eliminating barriers, both real and perceived,
and restoring patient dignity.
• The facility must remain ultimately flexible to adapt to unknown future care delivery models.
• The project must provide a cost - effective solution, maximizing value for dollars invested. ,
Completion of this project will further strengthen the foundation for a long -term vision, bringing to the
community a continuum of care excellence.
THE MASTER PLAN
The Master Plan being submitted for approval is based on the results of strategic medical planning and
programming which projects patient volumes and procedures for five years. Key components of the
Master Plan include:
• Clinical components and support spaces
• Educational facilities
• Quasi - public spaces .
• Medical Office Building
• Parking Ramp
• Skyway spanning France Avenue
The plan calls for hospital expansion to the west of the existing facility, a parking ramp on the 6400 block
(west of France Avenue), and a skyway connecting the two structures.
Pan 2 of 7 GA99 101 00�Admin\Memo\Report to Edina.doc
01/12/2000
1
The full Master Plan is proposed to be implemented over the course of three phases.
Phase I
The Phase I project schedule calls for construction to begin in the spring of 2000 and end in the
winter of 2002. The key clinical components of the master plan are included in this phase.
The first phase includes approximately 74,000 square feet of expansion (44,400 s.f. occupied,
29,600 s.f. shelled) occurring on First Level and Lower Level, along with 52,000 square feet of
remodeling on First Level.
The heart center is located in the new building expansion and includes the interventional
cardiology suite of seven procedure rooms (cath labs and other high -tech diagnostic and treatment
rooms).
Surgery expands within the existing building, adding 8 ORs to create a total of 28 Ors. The pre -
and -post recovery area is located between surgery and the interventional cardiology area.
MRI is being relocated adjacent to the Emergency Department.
There are a number of other areas indicated in the plan receiving a lesser degree of work.
Phase II
Phase II adds the Medical Mall as shell space, Parking Ramp and Skyway. Construction of this
phase begins in the spring of 2001 and ends in the winter of 2002. It also includes development of
the Medical Office Building, with participation of BTO Development Co. The Medical Office
Building will occur on levels 2, 3 and 4. The total square footage of Phase II is 93,300, which is
comprised of 65,700 for the MOB, 4,200 occupied hospital expansion (connecting corridors), and
23,400 of hospital expansion shell.
Phase III
The primary work to occur in Phase III includes completion of the Medical Mall, thereby
converting the outpatient services entrance to the west end. The pre and post- operative recovery
area will expand into the area previously occupied by the outpatient services reception area. A
lower level concourse, approximately 20 feet wide, will be created to route public traffic from the
new outpatient entrance to the existing inpatient elevator bank. Build -out of the remainder of the
lower level will include non - invasive cardiology, cardiac rehab, lab, quasi - public amenities, and a
research and conference auditorium. All these items are contained within previously -build space
so these components do not add to the facility square footage, but equal 53,000 s.f. of build -out.
Imaging will be relocated adjacent to Emergency to allow for expansion of the pre- and -post area. This on
First Level, along with cafeteria expansion and remodeling on Lower Level, add 6,700 s.f. to the facility.
Construction of Phase III is anticipated to begin in the spring of 2002 and be completed in the fall
of 2003.
Page 3 of 7
GA9910100Admin\Memo�Report to Edina.doc
01/12/2000
Building Form and Materials
The building design will be respectful of the existing hospital architecture, being complimentary and
consistent. Use of similar or compatable forms, materials and color will reinforce "campus ". The image
strives to be professional, comfortable and appropriate.
Proposed materials for the expansion project include brick to match the existing off -white building,
architectural precast concrete, green marble to match the existing building, aluminum and glass
curtainwall. A similar palette of materials used on the hospital expansion will carry into the MOB,
skyway and.parking ramp. Site landscaping is an integral component to the project design.
APPROVALS REQUESTED
Final Development Plan
We request that the City approve Fairview Southdale Hospital's Master Plan submitted January
12, 2000 as the Final Development Plan.
Parking
We request that the City concur with the assumptions outlined below which establish the parking
requirements.
It has been the experience of the hospital's consultants at other Twin City hospitals that
5 stalls /1,000 square feet serves as a strong foundation for establishing parking needs for
a hospital/medical office building campus. This has been reinforced by a study
conducted by HNTB Engineers. The Cities of Robbinsdale for North Memorial Medical
Center, and St. Louis Park for Methodist Hospital, among others, have accepted 5
stalls /1,000 square feet.
Attached is a study conducted by BRW, inc. October 25, 1999. The purpose of the study
was to evaluate the hospital's current parking utilization status. The method involved
placing crews on -site to count actual occupied and vacant parking stalls. This occurred .
over the course of two weeks, on alternate days and different times -of -day, to get viable
cross - sectional data. The results indicate the hospital has a surplus of existing parking
stalls, quantified at 410 stalls on average, 295 worst case scenario.
Another study conducted by the hospital and BRW, inc. found that the existing 6363
parking ramp is largely underutilized due to difficulty in visitors finding their way to the
second level. The study found that by reversing the in- and -out points in the ramp,
visitors would have far greater success locating all available parking, thereby increasing
parking efficiency. The hospital is currently in the process of implementing this change
and will have it operational spring 2000.
In establishing the baseline for parking requirements, given the information stated above,
the hospital feels it is justified in suggesting that there is an existing surplus of 375 stalls.
Based on these assumptions, below is a chart illustrating phase -by -phase parking requirements:
Page d of 7 GA9910100\Admin \Memo \Report to Edina.doc
01/12/2000
A
Phase New additional space (occupied)
Phase I 45,000 *s.f @ 5 stalls /1,000 s.f.
Phase I
Phase II 70,000* s.f. @ 5 stalls /1,000 s.f.
PhaseII
Phase III 60,000* s.f. @ 5 stalls /1,000 s.f.
Total
Parking requirement
+ 225 stalls
+ 130 net lost east of France
375 existing surplus
20 surplus stalls
+ 350 stalls
+ 335 surface stalls lost west
of France
+ 29 to replace those lost east
of France
20 remaining surplus
694 stalls
+ 300 stalls
10 stalls
= 984 stalls
As indicated in the above chart, there is adequate existing parking to accommodate the first phase
of expansion. Phase II triggers the need for 694 stalls. The Master Plan calls for the construction
of a 984 stall parking ramp occurring with Phase II. The parking ramp as constructed in Phase II
provides adequate parking to accommodate the of expansion needs of Phase III.
*In quantifying square footage per phase, shell space is not included, but becomes included at the
at the time it is built -out (occupied):
Setback Variance Requests
The following requests for variance would be required for the proposed four level
parking structure (three up / one down):
Page 5 of 7
France Avenue (Frontyard)
Average building height: 30'
Distance from property line: 50'
Requested setback variance: None
Crosstown Highway (Sideyard)
Average building height: 32'
Distance from property line: 0'
Requested setback variance: 32'.
65th Street (Sideyard)
Average building height: 35'
Distance from property line: 31'
Requested setback variance: 4' (Far west end only)
GA9910100\AdminWemoUtepor1 to Edina.doc
01/12P-000
West property line (Rearyard)
Average building height: 36'
Distance from property line: 88'
Requested setback variance: None
The following requests for variance are required for a potential seven level parking
structure (six up / one down):
France Avenue (Frontyard)
Average building height: 63'
Distance from property line: 50'
Requested setback variance: 13'
Crosstown Highway (Sideyard)
Average building height:
66'
Distance from property line:
0'
Requested setback variance:
66'
65`h Street (Sideyard)
Average building height:
68'
Distance from property line:
31'
Requested setback variance:
37'
West property line (Rearyard)
Average building height: 80'
Distance from property line: 88'
Requested setback variance: None
Floor Area Ratio and MrLYimum Building Coverage
Section 850.07 General Requirements Applicable to all Districts Except as Otherwise
Stated, Subd. 15 District Limits, states "Districts that are separated by public streets or
highways shall be deemed to be separate and independent districts and all requirements
and restrictions contained in this section must be met separately and independently by
each district."
We request exception to this and ask that, for the purposes of Floor Area Ratio and
Maximum Building Coverage, the properties east and west of France Avenue be
interpreted as a contiguous property, given that:
the Hospital shall remain the owner of both properties (attached is a letter
from Fairview Health Systems indicating their intention to remain owners
of the 6400 block into the indefinite future),
the two properties shall be physically linked upon construction of the
skyway, and
the actual FAR and MBC are quantified at just nominally beyond full
compliance even without granting an exception to 850.07, Subd. 15.
Pne 6 of 7 GA9910100Wdmin\N4emo\Report to Edina.doc
` 01/12/2000
M
Attachments
Application for Final Development Plan
Check for application fee for $500.00
Legal descriptions of applicant's property
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Site Plan (Master Plan)
Building Plans Phase I
First Floor and Site
Lower Level
Building Plans Phase H
First Floor and Site
Lower Level
Building Plans Phase U
Typical Third and Fourth Floors
Second Floor
Building Plans Phase III
First Floor and Site
Lower Level
Building Plans Phase III
Typical Third and Fourth Floors
Second Floor
Parking Ramp Plans
Exterior Sketches
Aerial View from Northwest
Aerial View from Southwest
Exterior and Interior Sketches
View from Second Floor Skyway Entry
Entry Image at Ground Level
Interior Sketches
Public Spaces at Lower Level
Stairway to First Floor
Page 7 of 7
Phase I Preliminary Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Phase II Preliminary Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Phase II Preliminary Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Phase I Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan
Phase lI Preliminary Sanitary Sewer Plan
Phase II Preliminary Sanitary Sewer Plan
Landscape Plan
Letter dated 12/8/99 from Fairview Health Systems re: ownership of 6400 property
Existing Parking Ramp Counts Report prepared by BRW, inc., dated 10/25/99
G: \9910100Wdmin\.Memo \Report to Edina.doc
01/12/2000
v1 /VI /uV 1A...7 ra.l "401UlJ /C
A.
ch
Wtn, tirt,.
CASE NUMBER DATE
FEE PAID
City of Edina Planning Department
4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (612) 826 -0369
APPLICATION FOR: - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FEE $500.00
APPLICANT:
NAME: Fairview Southdale Hospital
ADDRESS: 6401 France Avenue South PHONE: (612) 924 -5000
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: Fairview Southdale Hospital
ADDRESS: 6401 France Avenue South PHONE: (612) 924 -5000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ( SEE ATTACHED)
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6401 ' France Avenue South
PRESENT ZONING: RMD /APD P.I.D.#
Lc uuz
EXTLANATION OF REQUEST: Seeking approval of master'plan for expansion
of medical campus.
(Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary)
BWBR Architects
ARCHITECT: NAME: Rick Dahl PHONE: (651) 290 -1926
SURVEYOR: NAME:
PHONE:
Property Owner's Signature (Date) Applicant's Signature (Date)
12 -22 -1999 12:47 612 6727222 Hospital Facilities Office
AUG -27- 1998 09:29 FROM SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER TO
Exhibit A
Parcel 1
P.03
6265885 P.02
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1234, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Except that
part thereof which lies Westerly and Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on a
line parallel with and distant of 58. feet Easterly of the West line of said Tract A distant 239.32 feet (as
measured parallel with said West line) Southerly of the North line of said Tract A; thence run Southerly
parallel with and distant 58 fett Easterly of the West line of said Tract A for a distance of 273.82 feet;
thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 65 feet for a distance of 101.4 feet more or
less to intersection with a line drawn parallel to and distant 77 feet Northerly of the South line of said Tract
A; thence run Easterly along said line for a distance of 120 feet, thence run Southeasterly to a point on a
line parallel with and distant 65 feet Northerly of the South line of said Tract A said point distant 359.11
feet Easterly of the West line of said Tract A and there terminating, according to the recorded plat thereof,
and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Parcel 2
The East 2 %s acres of Lot 1, Cassin's Outlots, except that part thereof embraced in the plat of Southdale
Acres, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota
Parcel 3
That part of Drew Ave. So. as shown and dedicated in the plat of Southdale Acres, lying West of the East
line of Lot 1, Cassin's Outlots, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
TOTAL: P.02
H
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 1, Block 1, Southdale Office Park Add'.tion, except that part thereof which lies Easterly of
a line drawn parallel with and 48 feet We-terly of the following described line:
Commencing at the' Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 28, Range
24; thence run Northerly along Easterly l-ne of said section for a distance of 630.60 feet;
thence deflect left at an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of 10 feet; thence deflect right at
an angle of 90 degrees for a distance of :00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line
being described; thence deflect left alon;: a tangential curve having a radius of 5129.58 feet
(delta angle 1 degree 09 minutes 00 secon4:s) for a distance of 115 feet; thence tangent to said
curve for a distance of 84.30 feet; thence deflect right along a tangential curve having a
radius of 5729.58 feet (delta angle 0 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds) for a distance of 84.84
feet to the point of reverse curve; thence Northwesterly along said reverse curve having a
radius of 123 feet a distance of 140 feet and there terminating, according to the plat thereof
on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County.
BENCHMARK:
Top of City of Edina standard disc.No. 720 located on the southeast wing wall of Bridge No. 7263
at France Avenue over County Highway 62. �:levation = 890.88 (NGVD- 1929).
5
r L:] FAIRVIEW
Fairview Health Services
December 8, 1999
2450 Riverside Avenue
Mrnneapoh, MN 55454.1395
Tel 51 2- 672 -6300
Fax 617-672 -6303
Rick Dahl 651- 290 -1926 (fax 651- 222 -8961)
BWBR
400 Sibley Street, Suite 500
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Dear Mr. Dahl:
Fairview Health Services is planning construction for
that part of its Southdale Medical Center campus located on
the west side of France Avenue and commonly identified as
6400 France Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota.
Fairview Health Services intends to continue its
ownership of the 6400 France Avenue property as an
integral part of the Fairview Southdale Medical Center
campus.
Please call me with your further questions and .
comments.
ry truly yours,
Raymond E. Piirainen
-Director of Real Estate
612 -672 -6963 (fax 612 -672 -7124)
r iirail fairview.or
� e
MBRW
__ ._ __ _ - -- -----PC-0 - - -- --
A DAMES d MOORE GNW MPANY
To:
Rick Dahl, AIA
Daniel Weber, FSH
From:
Bob Kost, ASLA
Date:
October 25, 1999
Subject:
Parking Counts
Copy: Jeanie Witzig, AICP
George Calebaugh, PE
MEMORANDUM
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 370 -0700
Fax: (612) 370 -1378
File: 33890 - 010 -1003
Attached are the parking counts from last weeks parking survey. I have also attached the
previous count. To date we have documented parking usage on a Monday, Tuesday and
Thursday for a total of 7 separate occasions. The data reveals the following:
1. Parking demand fluctuates slightly on a day to day basis.
2. Parking demand is greatest between 9:00 AM and 3:30 PM.
3. On average, there are approximately 410 parking spaces available during the daytime
hours. (Average was computed by adding the 6 daytime counts and dividing by 6.)
4. The greatest parking demand was recorded for Thursday at 2:30 PM; 1,294 spaces
occupied out of 1,589 provided for a total of 295 available spaces.
5. The parking ramp was nearly 92% occupied on Thursday at 2:30 PM, (95% occupancy is
considered full).
P
Table
Fairview Southdale Medical Center Parking Study
Mondav -Oct. 18.1999
Parking Lot/Ramp
Total Number of
Parking Spaces
Time Period
9:30 AM
2:30
PM
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
Percent
Occupied
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
Percent
Occupied
A
1006
867
86.2%
814
80.9%
B
231
167
72.3%
187
81.0%
C
352
207
58.8%
166
47.2%
Total
1589
1241
78.1%
1167
73.4%
Thursday -Oct. 21, 1999
Parking Lot/Ramp
Total Number of
Parking Spaces
Time Period
9:30 AM
2:30
PM
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
percent
Occupied
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
percent
Occupied
A
1006
884
87.9%
907
90.2%
B
231
183
79.2%
212
91.8%
C
352
199
56.5%
175
49.7%
Total
1589
1266
79.7%
1294
81.4%
A - Parking Ramp located northeast of the Medical Center building
B - Parking Lot located west of -the Medical Center building
C - Employee Parking Lot located west of France Avenue
source: BRW, Inc. 10/22/99
Table
Fairview Southdale Medical Center Parking Study
Tuesdav -00. 5. 1999
Parking Lot/Ramp
Total Number of
Parking Spaces
Time Period
7:30 AM
3:30
PM
11:30 PM
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
Percent
Occupied
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
Percent
Occupied
Number of
Occupied
Spaces
Percent
Occupied
A
1006
605
60.1%
852
84.7%
241
24.0%
B
231.
113
48.9%
206
89.2%
57
24.7%
C
352
165
46.9%
165
46.9%
3
0.9%
Total
1589
883
55.6%
1223
77.0%
301
18.9%
A - Parking Ramp located northeast of the Medical Center building
B - Parking Lot located west of the Medical Center building
C - Employee Parking Lot located west of France Avenue
O)ource �W, Inc.
i c 19
6V
p
UK"MMANI MAIN. U-
M90
KWKWA
�g
8
I
O 15 30 Bo
SCALE IN FEET
oe°
ON
INS
BED .
��, �ti7i�iT/���.��1Tr �
ANNUAL BEDS
ORNAMENTAL TREE ^` /
ORNAMENTAL TREE
EVERGREEN BED
DECIDUOUS TREES
PLANT SCHEDULE
KEY
OTY.
807ANK:AI NAPE
COMMON NAPE
92E
ROD"
REMARKS
�i
R11lROI®1 71�
r
OHS
Black Hills
oum dneo a
tl'
on
%
C GS
Colorado ben a
pungne
%
AP
Austrian Pine
- PNus Mgm
%
Ofcmuou 1 71110
s
Ulti lect Lindsl
LOW SHRUB
Bd9
HEDGE
PSA
Prokis ke AN
us ponnsywn ca Rugby
PERENNIAL BE
%
INS
BED .
��, �ti7i�iT/���.��1Tr �
ANNUAL BEDS
ORNAMENTAL TREE ^` /
ORNAMENTAL TREE
EVERGREEN BED
DECIDUOUS TREES
PLANT SCHEDULE
KEY
OTY.
807ANK:AI NAPE
COMMON NAPE
92E
ROD"
REMARKS
R11lROI®1 71�
OHS
Black Hills
oum dneo a
tl'
on
%
C GS
Colorado ben a
pungne
%
AP
Austrian Pine
- PNus Mgm
%
Ofcmuou 1 71110
U.
Ulti lect Lindsl
Bd9
%
PSA
Prokis ke AN
us ponnsywn ca Rugby
%
GB
I Autumn Cold Gingko
Gingko blloba Autumn Gold
%
ISL
I—y Slk U lac
5 In a reti-lota 'Iwr Slk'
25
%
SC
Snowdrift Crabo a
I w rI '
25"
%
mcligu 1O
VBa-0
G1A
!Teen Mound AI Ine Durant
Rmm iwm 'Ren M
2t
%
F$
Froabel ieq
iao s bumtlda 'f r*"
%
UPS
UtBe PrI,—
keo nka 'Utu. P
%
011O10R®1 81,11111111114111
SGJ
Sea Green Junk
24'
C—L
x
PoloweALO
SOL
st corz Da 1
Hemerornlll. Slolla Orc
1 GAL
%
I
Rudbeckio tul Ido Galdsturm
1 GAL
'0
� t 7
t 4
��� ■ill
� ■ •.-.0 L Ieaeeer�
r0i Ll
pmi r
FAIRVIEW
SOUTHDALE
MEDICAL
CAMPUS
EXPANSION
0YM CTB
�d
d..ti -mil
NBRW
A
wren YI�rMe —�
®e�Y re�Ir Yrl l®
r.r a
33890010 R'K
Ali
PHASE o
PRELJIIYNAFIY
ill r
L -1
entrees...
A
wren YI�rMe —�
®e�Y re�Ir Yrl l®
r.r a
33890010 R'K
Ali
PHASE o
PRELJIIYNAFIY
ill r
L -1
entrees...
February 14, 2000
City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50" St
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion Proposal
I am a partner owner in the Professional Center Southdale at 3625 West 65a' Street
adjacent to Fairview Southale Hospital Campus and Southdale Medical Building.
We have been concerned over the last few years as various proposals were attempted by
Fairview in order to correct their deficiencies of space and parking.
We would urge the Edina Council to review any proposal for expansion parking of any of
the properties in this area based on the impact to all the area properties and not each
individually.
The development of parking for the business community at the France and 50m area was
an excellent example of what could be done by creating an excellent parking facility
which benefited the business, the community in the area as well as the tax base for the
City of Edina by allowing greater density for business.
We would urge you to advocate a study and proposals to determine the feasibility of
similar composite parking for this area rather than an expansion for Fairview Southdale, a
proposed expansion parking for Southdale Medical Building and or other building in the
area.
Respectfiully.
Johrf .Ellis MD
6 *Harbor Beach NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: February 15, 2000
Subject: Preliminary Rezoning and
Preliminary Plat.
Frauenshuh Companies.
NE quadrant of 169/494
Recommendation:
Agenda Item:
Ill. C.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
EJ
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary
Plat approval subject to:
1. Watershed District Permit
2. Permits from MNDOT
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans.
DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 26, 2000
Z -00 -1. Frauenshuh Companies
& 7101 West 78th Street
S -00 -1
Request:. Rezoning from POD -1 to POD -2 and 2 lot subdivision
Gen Location: Northeastern quadrant of Highways 169 and 494
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the subject property measures
approximately 13 acres, is zoned Planned Office District, POD -1, and is vacant.
The northerly 75 feet of the site is subject to an NSP easement for an overhead
transmission line. The central portion of the site contains a pond covered by an
easement in favor of the state highway department. A large portion of the site is
impacted by wetlands and flood plain.
The subject property is owned by the City of Edina. It was acquired from
the FDIC in 1991. The City has entered into a purchase agreement with the
Frauenshuh Company to acquire and develop the popery. The site became part
of the City in 1981 as part of a land exchange with the City of Bloomington that
also .include portions of the Raddison South Hotel. The action to zone the'
property for office use occurred while the property was still apart of
Bloomington.
Mr. Larsen explained the proposal would subdivide the property into 2
lots, rezoning the larger lot (Lot 1) to POD -2, and leaving the Lot 2 zoned POD -
1. The only difference between the two office zones is that POD 71 limits building
height to 4 stories while the POD -2 district does not have a height limit. The
developers intend to immediately develop Lot 1, and hold Lot 2 for future
development.
The building proposed for Lot 1 would be 7 stories in height and contain a
gross floor area of 168,258 square feet. The building would be supported by a 7
level parking structure containing 681 spaces. Total on site parking is proposed
at 703 spaces. Code requires 673 spaces for a building this size.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proposed plans request two
variances, both are front street setback variances. In the office district if the
building or structure height exceeds 35 feet, the setback must equal the height
Mr. Larsen responded that is correct, the City has made the decision to
market the property, and Frauenshuh Companies has expressed interest in
purchasing and developing it.
Commissioner McClelland asked who makes the decision to sell City
property. Mr. Larsen said the City Council makes that decision.
Commissioner Swenson said she has a concern regarding the isolation of
this site, and questioned the lack of amenities available in the area. Mr. Larsen
said it is the hope of the City that this piece of land is developed taking full
advantage of the ordinance. The ordinance allows for the development of
support services.
Commissioner Swenson asked why the proposed office building is so
dense. Mr. Larsen said the proposed density is not unusual for the size of the
site. The problem is due to the wetlands, and the availability of unrestricted
land. Mr. Larsen pointed out not much buildable land is available demanding
that the building goes up.
Commissioner Byron observed this is an important piece of scenic
property in the City. It is also an entrance to our City, that has environmental
impact. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if another building could be
constructed on the site. Mr. Larsen responded as he assessed the site he
believes another building., could also be constructed on the site, but not to the
same degree. Continuing,.Mr. Larsen explained also under consideration for
potential re- development is the site of the existing gun range. It is possible that
one day this site will contain a "training facility" which will be used by a number
of law enforcement and fire department personnel. Commissioner Byron asked
Mr. Larsen if the Commission has some assurance the proposed building will not
be constructed higher than the proposed seven stories. Mr. Larsen said the
building height can not exceed seven stories.
Commissioner McClelland said she has trouble considering a seven story
office building in such close proximity to Braemar: 'She pointed out the entire NE
corner of the site is wetlands and floodplain and construction of a building on
this site will negatively impact the environment.
Commissioner Lonsbury told the Commission it is his understanding that
two issues face Edina, one is traffic and the other is affordable housing.
Commissioner Lonsbury said he is troubled by the proposed use of the site,
adding he is not sure it is appropriate.
I
Mr. Donnelly reiterated the history of the site and assured the
Commission the proposed new office building will be constructed with sensitivity
to the environment.
Commissioner Swenson commented that this proposal will increase traffic
in the area and questioned if the area can handle the increased traffic. Mr.
Hoffman explained the frontage road will be further developed and expanded to
accommodate traffic changes.
Commissioner Bergman explained to members of the Commission that
she resides in the area, and when DIPS proposed to construct an office building
off West 78`h street she,. along with her neighbors, were afraid of the outcome.
Commissioner Bergman said today the DIPS building enhances the area, and
any negative impact was mostly imagined. Commissioner Bergman pointed out
the proposed site at present needs to be developed, and the decision has been
made to develop it. Commissioner Bergman stated in her opinion the present
condition of the site is not desirable.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hoffman where the pump station is
located in proximity to the. subject site. Mr. Hoffman said the pump station was.
removed.
Commissioner Byron stated given the City's decision to market the site it
is the job of the Commission to recommend to them either a POD -1, or POD -2 .
zoning. Continuing, Commission Byron said his concerns were the totality of the
development, the height of the proposed building,' and the impact the building
may have on the golf course, and the near residential properties. Commissioner
Byron said after consideration he believes this site can accommodate a seven
story structure.
Commissioner Byron moved to recommend preliminary rezoning and plat
approval subject to permits from the Nine Mile Watershed District and permits
from MNDOT. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. Ayes; Byron,
Bergman, Lonsbury, Johnson. Nays, McClelland, Swenson. Motion carried.
w
LOCATION MAP . f
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
LOCATION 169/494
REQUEST Construct office Building
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 26, 2000
STAFF REPORT
Z -00 -1 Frauenshuh Companies
& 7101 West 78th Street
S -00 -1
Request: Rezoning from POD -1 to POD -2 and 2 lot subdivision
Gen. Location: Northeastern quadrant of Highways 169 and 494
The subject property measures approximately 13 acres, is zoned Planned
Office District, POD -1, and is.vacant. The northerly 75 feet of the site is subject
to an NSP easement for an overhead transmission line. The central portion of
the site contains a pond covered by an easement in favor of the state highway
department. A large portion of the site is impacted by wetlands and flood plain.
The subject property is owned by the City of Edina. It was acquired from
the FDIC in 1991. The City.has entered into a purchase agreement with the
Frauenshuh Company to I acquire and develop the popery. The site became part
of the City in 1981 as part of a land exchange with the City of Bloomington, that
also include portions of the Raddiso.n South Hotel. The action to zone the
property for office use occurred while the property was, still apart of
Bloomington.
The proposal would subdivide the property into 2 lots, rezoning the larger
lot (Lot 1) to POD -2, and. leaving the Lot 2 zoned POD -1. The only difference
between the two office zones is that POD -1 limits building height to 4 stories
while the POD -2 district does not have a height limit. The developers intend to
immediately develop Lot 1, and hold Lot 2 for future development.
The building proposed for Lot 1 would be 7 stories in height and contain a
gross'floor area of 168,258 square feet. The building would be supported by a 7
level parking structure containing 681 spaces. Total on site parking is proposed
at 703 spaces. Code requires 673 spaces for a building this size.
The proposed plans request two variances, both are front street setback
variances. In the office district if the building or structure height exceeds 35 feet,
the setback must equal the height of the building or structure. In this instance
the building is 122 feet 8 inches measured from grade to the top of the
penthouse. The ramp measures 75 feet in height. Thus, setback variances of
87 feet 8 inches for the building and 40 feet for the ramp are required.
The proposed development will be served by an extension of the West 78th
Street/ frontage road which now ends at the east side of the site. The new road.
will extend west and then north to the Valley View/ 169 interchange.
Exterior materials of the proposed building would be predominately glass. The
ramp would be finished with precast concrete panels with glass on elevator
towers. The materials comply with ordinance standards.
In addition to the rezoning a subdivision of the property into 2 lots is requested.
Lot 2 is not proposed for development at this time. Development of this lot
would be subject to Final Development Plan review. The subdivision will
facilitate separate ownership of the site. The subdivision complies with
ordinance requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff supports the rezoning to allow a taller building on the westerly portion of
this site. Although the site is large, the buildable area is relatively small. In
order to realize a reasonable development intensity, a taller building and
structured parking are necessary. Wetlands, flood plain, and the NSP easement
combine to create a significant hardship and justify granting of variances for
building and parking structure height.
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and subdivision subject to:
1. Permits from Nine Mile Watershed District
2. Permits from MNDOT
F_
.L
Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Development Submittal fors
OFFICE TOWER AT 169 & I -494
-SHEET INDEX
11 C40YER
a.
Cim
TOPOGRAPHIC r
LW.
cu
- GEOMETRIC AHD AN
C1]
GRADPG DRAMAGE AND ER0610N CONTROL RAN
CI!
UTILITr FLAN
CIA
C1%4L DETAIL I
C15
CM DETAI 7
Clb
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAM PFACT PLAN
PRELIMINARY PLAT
FPIAL PLAT
UPA_
A
WE
A2
ARC441TECTLFLAL PLANS
A!
BftDW,4 ELEVATIaO
.
...ate
11 1 .1 4_ PAX *GAMY -230
01.m 6— M wan
J>. a oo..Mlq
sMr< m.w.erar
■.a...w..a� Cyr c_ 6v/!)1 -TlN
W& aaum eln of FAH 6GG37 -01H
M—pd., ML 66404
R.iN llwM. n Js Mmes
wk C _ Mu rnrla..
A6�0GT.
Ilw.a r.rn. nrclp.l- ware.
a.... wrru n J.•u w,.g�
Jdn Lrwi A.J.o� .w�luet
r•w�u R6�.A.11A•�
L�d� d� IIaN A>.r. rG MH Ma 1~10
�aa Ar�a6n ew 660
poly, 66.eJ
O.b L.ft.
== K PM: M27
]a! Y. A— 6 .W GA oaa6
Mnrp. . Mr 6640
L cores Pblrw . Ol.a.. d 60.1-2+60
1a 6 w..a d. 6ao sea MH 6Gliaa•G60
OL P.r, r1� ibW-7 V]
L d Jft O A.J— lr.rlul lI%
1..d. Jor.q PJL neJc1 wWNr61 b�.r
�r`� 6rH6�
627WLn. y� M ibnl.C— M %iOAN-
p
Mbr NMi 66Nt .
rsd.� bWC Ovw 1 wo
Ta f . ONI E a
6gw•.r
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
w.a.r 6761.003.00
�r
er. r
�4
w u•.ema
cova Sr
T1
r r
a
. a... MpRI. 1 �•.
sR wv�� •1['••'" r•. +' :._ _ � -• I -- unwnw.wuua •Ya
• Y•— nvo '��- ����',1T'��:.• -.may mnwa
— -� w1.IR._[ [ j t r_� - W......�_.... _..�Q,., _ � I.MY OO IIC�.oWl.01• }3[
`'`;�� � 1' `ti'`'p •, ((r (11 ,'Q" � d` / I ,1} % %' `0 j E
+rte ,�• �:'•ii' - G �\ �/ w :;,.. ?' =E:. ..---'w_- '.!' i p
may, "• \ " �. � • ,�� • 1 t
•�.. «. n -•m. un•uY.. ... «. •n .•.•i w•aw Yr�or tl•...�.• ,- 1
.., o „� a.�oD�•'r.. ...... �:•• .i n• :.';.• ice.. r„
,.,M.•...•.,y. .ql•«•• 1•• tl« YI.• 4n• 01••• I. \. tr
�I” w.. i:,,�i.i:.i; '•'iii..mM.�. rooi�.w Yi N� ��'G�s GQ
n•n ...: w •ew Dole ou,r.tim. uu ova•a�t+u� ..+ -
ni- •s•w..o . gun •ou• v o ua[.o.ww I � eC.l.! 1' . 07 ,.L�'
i M•. ...r....•�i�Miw�.,. [i�i'i.•ii•••��I�.iw�iM ~ _
Cb
ip
PROPOSED
PARKING
RAMP
STATE w: b wows BEFORE EXC-AOTO OR DEMOL)SHDM B"MM CAL (651)
454 -oau2 FOR F¢w LOCATION Or NDEA m HO UWTI LNiS. (DDS SERVICE LOCATES
UINTv UHNED uNES BUT NOT PRNATE ULES.)
THE LOCAI qN5 Or HOERORoUTO UM1E.5 ARE SHORN N M APPRODWTE MY OWv AND
HAVE Not BEEN a1DEKNUENRV VEROED. THE EPAET LAGOON 01 ALL UTILITIES MUST BE
DETENUNED BEFORE EOVUENCNG ROIL
,`:.1::
PROPOSED
OFFICE
TOWER
• 4 !' O .eve�O w0- wu .Fa LemLT m
•., ," r s�.f o a•om
'Y4' `•!•. eeio a aRecnAL nor
(D ti�iew
ED o RR� ewo wa une • mAr
OAO !
\ w emeo R r w or mos. r
195-
e
O�hE•R � m .m.° Ro a.. Re. w.ee ..
'• � s
N
IYB
/S
L[OENO: (PROPOSED SvSTEY) _
c
0
.c
CEOTEETRr AND PAMNC CEWAL NOTES
1, THE M]aR LTNA van THE 911 pmw 10
*pORO TO IME11SIANO THE SCOTS Or .010.
b A M ORML mNFENSATCN R- BE
ALLDAm FOR OEYS THAT CO LO KwE 6ELN
OOPTEO - A SRE MI. SIUOVK ME
R1OnMARC SU K . TR01Q11 , mEmmm
ALL PT/1Rf ANO —TICH TAt REPORT NO
A00T10aE M FWa REORITIO no
0M "V R AEA TO B*Wo
Niue+ Ib r.ur �cnl TH.1 r A m v
AewRO Rve
r-.Rw RmPORNiF_
AAtea n•
RSP Architects, Ltd.
120 First Ave N Mos., MN 55101
(m 612B6160 FT 612).))0313
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
A
DRL
IjC
11 JANUARY 2000
HWY 169 k 494
OFFICE TOWER
GEOMETRIC
AND
PAVING
PLAN
1`mg
aJ
��1I
m
W *E
/S
SCALE' 1• - 50'
LEccko: (powomo srsrrm)
e oY..vv na�i4t.P
tUHOL
®■■rte me
oa-
rfNCRAL NOTES.
1. THE •00[11 SHNU. Y9T M LIE w1O• A •IOOMO 10 WOUSANO
THE SCOPE Of ■I NO MIOTOML CDNPfIOA —L R MLDVER
rO' 11CY! TW11 OJUID .MR W00 Qll1 ✓[D T A SM Y -. 4111"M
TN[
GDOTECHNCAL MtaC . ADWIDN L RLMEVVO MU RAYS MO
ojuar"now R M to ANO AfAf1D1■l NfOWWMI 1m01K•I[D TM
nA■flrwnON ►RION 9 mOLW-
_ . w ■ms ll..a m ma+.cm. on..u...
J. ■EnANO EDGE ■ TO at SWU ARgR TO fA6TMXfVX ■CnAND
AISA 6 NOT N K DOIUI m M AM TINE.
W a:
.oaa ..ALL w..aus ea .... TANS u+it . mn s .uoa .w . rune
L tWi■
WilTn NOTfs•
(D.w.W
RSP Architects, Ltd.
170 fist Ave N Mos., MN 55401
fax 617 339 6760 P6 612 ))9 OSI)
cuAIOAA..o. (i� w-s u
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
T,r
i i .IANL IARY 2000
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
GRADING.
DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
C1.2
\ \ 11
n
�
u
U
—
1
•
—
\
\ '. \•. .
. {, ` "•:t
1
�
E
��
VIMIY ONHED UHES DUI HOl OWAR LWES)
-1L
Q ,
`
� uL
THE LOCA"UNS Of UNDERGROUND UTR1nES ME SHOWN N M APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND
E-CT LDCAnom Or ALL UnNIES N.6T at
L
r
KIN
RAM
\
r.
��1I
m
W *E
/S
SCALE' 1• - 50'
LEccko: (powomo srsrrm)
e oY..vv na�i4t.P
tUHOL
®■■rte me
oa-
rfNCRAL NOTES.
1. THE •00[11 SHNU. Y9T M LIE w1O• A •IOOMO 10 WOUSANO
THE SCOPE Of ■I NO MIOTOML CDNPfIOA —L R MLDVER
rO' 11CY! TW11 OJUID .MR W00 Qll1 ✓[D T A SM Y -. 4111"M
TN[
GDOTECHNCAL MtaC . ADWIDN L RLMEVVO MU RAYS MO
ojuar"now R M to ANO AfAf1D1■l NfOWWMI 1m01K•I[D TM
nA■flrwnON ►RION 9 mOLW-
_ . w ■ms ll..a m ma+.cm. on..u...
J. ■EnANO EDGE ■ TO at SWU ARgR TO fA6TMXfVX ■CnAND
AISA 6 NOT N K DOIUI m M AM TINE.
W a:
.oaa ..ALL w..aus ea .... TANS u+it . mn s .uoa .w . rune
L tWi■
WilTn NOTfs•
(D.w.W
RSP Architects, Ltd.
170 fist Ave N Mos., MN 55401
fax 617 339 6760 P6 612 ))9 OSI)
cuAIOAA..o. (i� w-s u
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
T,r
i i .IANL IARY 2000
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
GRADING.
DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
C1.2
\ \ 11
SIATE LAN: a• HOURS KrORE ESUYAnNG OR DCUOUSHING •ULDNOS. CALL (651)
'k: ;�•
\
\ '. \•. .
. {, ` "•:t
LS•- R]'m FIELD LOfAf10N Or UNDERGROUND Hn Lny LNES. (THIS Su1vCC LOGRS
oo
VIMIY ONHED UHES DUI HOl OWAR LWES)
THE LOCA"UNS Of UNDERGROUND UTR1nES ME SHOWN N M APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND
E-CT LDCAnom Or ALL UnNIES N.6T at
\
OAK NOI OELN wucrt.H my vERwN . THE
UC NUORE GO —ENC -C WORN.
RNLOnW
��1I
m
W *E
/S
SCALE' 1• - 50'
LEccko: (powomo srsrrm)
e oY..vv na�i4t.P
tUHOL
®■■rte me
oa-
rfNCRAL NOTES.
1. THE •00[11 SHNU. Y9T M LIE w1O• A •IOOMO 10 WOUSANO
THE SCOPE Of ■I NO MIOTOML CDNPfIOA —L R MLDVER
rO' 11CY! TW11 OJUID .MR W00 Qll1 ✓[D T A SM Y -. 4111"M
TN[
GDOTECHNCAL MtaC . ADWIDN L RLMEVVO MU RAYS MO
ojuar"now R M to ANO AfAf1D1■l NfOWWMI 1m01K•I[D TM
nA■flrwnON ►RION 9 mOLW-
_ . w ■ms ll..a m ma+.cm. on..u...
J. ■EnANO EDGE ■ TO at SWU ARgR TO fA6TMXfVX ■CnAND
AISA 6 NOT N K DOIUI m M AM TINE.
W a:
.oaa ..ALL w..aus ea .... TANS u+it . mn s .uoa .w . rune
L tWi■
WilTn NOTfs•
(D.w.W
RSP Architects, Ltd.
170 fist Ave N Mos., MN 55401
fax 617 339 6760 P6 612 ))9 OSI)
cuAIOAA..o. (i� w-s u
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
T,r
i i .IANL IARY 2000
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
GRADING.
DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
C1.2
�NI1�/
S
suu: �' - �o•
LEGEND: 6PROPOYO 5YMM)
. r.uwo.e
r ..r
r N •� m m ND
1. nre SDOD1 21 u VW ir[ SITE PWIDW 1D eDOWC 10
11WDr1s1.WD THE SLOP[ Or WOOL NO ADanmm CLIHNS00%
WILL K ALLOWED FM fTU S n l O rwe GUA QMVWO n
• Sm —. SNOW( D[ lopm c SU ' .40 O 1
WMCt l KAY MO MDKC W M W W AM .DOMMI
MDIWMDM AWAV[D 141 QA1N1G1O11 PWO1 TO 10O
p mans • n mos.n a ®�o s ress ..nrr
Qo r an .u4 Wu. 1Wrw A r..nN.. wP.s •
�i .WI.aO M [DW�rCW.I . 9 .I.• Iwl
M IOOm . �� PI.PW� !mil by V t O0i bl
PP Irrrl �n WWF M @ROYOO� Mom AWi Iola
4 m.fOWA� Q Nllb in.srm
RSP Architects. Ltd.
120 Frst Ave N No&. NN 55401
Fm 612 119 6760 Ph 612 559 0515
FRAUENSHUIi
COMPANIES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Q-fQ 099155
QKL'
Tir '
I I JANUARY 2000
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
UTILITY
PLAN
C1.3
N i•OP
` r y
F
u•
ll:�;'_ �r�7�
6�
�.��rrrom
.r
Uf / c
e.DO F1 4 s
�Lr �
iSP Architects, Ltd.
10 first Ave N Mos.. UN 55401
m 611 199 6160 fT 611 3390313
FRAUENSIIUII
COMPANIES
NOT. FOR
CONSTRUCTION
i&r ruuu5
Dgi
euneft l' 9000
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
CIVIL
DETAILS
p 1
C1'.4
N......... ..... ....
PROPOSED
VAf
,.tlQNc .......
,SS
SCALL' 1* � 4Cr
wv'o
LEGEND. (PROPOSED sysrvA)
... ......
100 WM MOOD PLAIN CKTA '4`
A........ ........................... ..........
RSP Architects, Ltd.
120 fist Ave N MOS., MN 55401
Fm 612 IB 6760 Ph 612 339 0313
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
LI;;
T
JANUARY
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
IMPACT
PLAN
C1.6
SED
I QWER
F.F,.E. 80.00
V
..........................
,SS
SCALL' 1* � 4Cr
wv'o
LEGEND. (PROPOSED sysrvA)
... ......
100 WM MOOD PLAIN CKTA '4`
A........ ........................... ..........
RSP Architects, Ltd.
120 fist Ave N MOS., MN 55401
Fm 612 IB 6760 Ph 612 339 0313
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
LI;;
T
JANUARY
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
IMPACT
PLAN
C1.6
BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION
to ro t
aw.w *rr LAW
------------------------
z
0
D Emus in mc"vm PrE
,,OALAtE.T "Ok,,'O
o "'iOlEs 112 — " 1. FIOI IRD'it
PK LCNACNT TO LSET
". OEM.
1Sl D 15224 ittji
di ft FLAG By
0 DUOTES MNWYM C06MY
MOMACMT FOLM .
y
ODOTOS DK—C AID ilTKtTT E.SLW.136
OEM 5 FEET WIDE AND ADJOWID LOT ,ES
A,V to FEET ME AID ADJUMIG STREET LW%
,LESS 01HERMISE SAOM On FLAT.
BTAEA.! OF THIS PLAT ARE ON M ASSLAIED
ORDOATICK BASED I LOMMIA DEPARTMENT
Of TRAIG"TATION M7-WAY FLAT .10,
"".L . MIDI W tAltilit LK OF LOT 1.
BLOCK WLALWOCU FK IS A F 54- E. 10
11E I it, OF SA 8V O
,::;". a A I ,a ■
—,;, : 1.
E-
1191,
SCALE W FM
60 too
200
sall"I
)7 A1.4 it I A d"---w r D.L
Aba JV4AW4 j*A§jjS
—
``\ ------------------L----
wr L"
zl
---------------
- - - - -J1
■ wwar 9 JiMlil
--- - - - - --
- -
W.Umm WN / /mot, - -- - - - - -- --
of Mfr LAW
jb
OrT LAW
N, W IN
EST
7
A
(VACAIED)
S W'01'37• ■ IBBDO
-t>gecr 1—If-00 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION
KNOW ALL PER90N8 BY THESE PRESENTS, Tb•t OR? Holding• LLC, a Ylmeeola limited
11.01 I11) o vp retie., or r said ppr prl •t or, end
rtgsales of !at Io11oa Dt°do erlbed properly .,fueled 1. the County el M•m•plo,
91st. , Y,.nse et•, to Wlt:
Lot 1 a .ept ll• E•.t.rl/ 170 tWl t0•reel• Block 1, Bror..d Pert, •ooerd ing
t. tao �ecurde0 1st lh.r.of, Led. pa Count). k 1, Whic; log•Llu .Ill flat
pert .1 out Toth s..I.l. V!; Led. le .aid Sleek 1, rllcl 11°. ..•feel! If 'he
West It.•. one the en to..lo. thereof. or s•Id D••lerlp 170 Is•t of Lot 1
N••s c sed lbs .•me le De our raped and pl•llad •• BRAL700D PARE a2C... ADDITION
•I,d do °nor•h, deo.I. •.d d.d I. l• gas pu blto l.a. .sa — ,. as shown honoo I.r
dreloes• said utility purge... ..ly.
le .Ito•.° rbsr.el •std DNr Neldinge LLC ha. caused these present. to be signed
Or It. pr ogee of tlosr• ill• —_ day of
Dk► HOLDINGS LLC
By - - -- Ile By It.
STATE Of MINNESOTA
COUNTY Oy
The lor.got.g la.lru.•.t We. •hkmoWI.dg.d bat fore me this day of ,
4 _. eDd
1 DRr Idle {{° LLC, • YI.W.ele Ilmlled IIe0111{p ..r porn loo, oai belelf o! Said
IlnN led IIah111L) eor porelloD.
tlot•r/ Publlo, _ Coolly. Ylnu•eef.
Y) C. ®1•n o. Ee pare•
In rile••• Whereof eatd bas eeu.•d the.. pre ..I. to be signed
by ,1. pr oysr ollle or• ibis asp .r
by — It. BJ lt.
STATE Or MINNESOTA -
COUNTY Uy
Th. ter yol.• ,..tat um•.l W. •ek- 1.dgod be a....r lea. dy el ,
b) said
of • on bahal1 of sold'
Nol•ry Public, County, Ylmue la
Yp Coomloloo Cs Dl no
I ber•by a else' 'hot 1 he,* YeIed .ad plot led the Property de •er'bad o lhle plat
• BkIE.DOD PANE SRCONO ADDITION; fat ibis plat 1. • rreol r.prWDl•llen of t
e ufuul; feel •11 dl. —;1. her• °Ono tlrrooll• on lh° 1V. t in 1•el and o ash", hundredth . 1
y pleeed to the frouaid e. foes or 111
o• Dlaeed as required bJ the local .rersmeolal unit; l0al the oul•lde hou.do, lieu
•ell) d.atgnated o• lb• plet; sod tai., floe. •r• .. puDllo hIgOWJs to h•
d.ag —Led on the plat.
Jails Y. C6•f lee, Land gun •Joe
Y1o..ol• LIe.W S "Mai. 16220
C nGINLCnItlG
G 4RPOAAIIY■
„rat,
STATE OF MINNESOTA
coutlrT or
il• to..going Surveyor'. Certllloelo We. aekneWledg.e before I.r this
Lice..• N.. IOEYB. -- by gone, V. Coolies. Lend Bltrr.y.r, US ..... to
Notary Publlo County. Ylon•ool•
Y7 C ®leelo. lapin.
EDIYA, Y11012BOTA
ibis p1•l et BBA[NOOD PARE SECOND ADDITION Wa. approved sod a •yy� ed by the City
Cou Dell of L01.•, YlainuoL•, al . . ul.r era Ls lh.r.ef h.ld°lhl• Oq
. 1.D. __ 11 •pp�l.sble; the Written em.rots aid ree ®eDde-
lle.. al the Co ®le•lo•.r of T— sportallosa and the C. u.ty NIghW) EDg1W•r her•
b..D r•oa vsdhy lla Cltp or th. prWerlhed 90 day po hod hu .1.•p.d .l !boa
root pl 1 • h ".retie sod re °e ®era lone. •. pr eolded by Ylan. Sielut•e
Seed.& 006.09, global. B.
CITY COUNCIL OF EDIMA, MINNESOTA
Mayer Clerk
TAEPAYEN onvICES DIYISIOtl, Yonepla O•mly. Ylm.eel•
1 h•r.ap a illy Ebel teas° pe))abl• to end prior fears have bee p.ld lee
Iwd d °•Sri eod as this plat. Dated tail. dap .1
Patrlek H. O'C..ner, Hennepin county Auditor
By , Deputy
SURVEY SECTION, Yonaeple, County, Ylmeeota
Pursuant to Mlm. Statutes Section 5898.699 (1069), thin plot boa boo approved
lh, . dp of . �.
Gary P. C.oe11. L.B., 11eNOeP19 County Surveyor
By
R10111TRAR OF TITLED, Hennepin Cemlp, Minnesota
1 hersOy o•rlllll that the Wtlhln plot of BRAREOOD PINK SECOND ADDITION Wae 111°0
to ree.rd to t41. of as thlA d•J of _ —�. .t _
o'e lock —M.
MI beef M. Cu0o111— Akting Reglarar °1 Tines
by. , Deputy
PCIF % 1'11-00 SKEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION S
------------
.........
-----------------
7 - — ----------
.. ... .... ..
WET LAND
All —x
VIV11,010 EDGE
a"4
...... FrE 00
-7 slogy
X..
p
40110 EDGE m.
X
�q
V-
-wil
- - - - - - - - - -
A
lk
Udt-
WE"'
92CRipnow, . .. ... L 0 -122
00-► 1. P.,
®rfsq la ULL a! P.1
—1 7m Sur,% agr4 M -w
U-0. -0
175 1" .0
Ve= TER/DEVELOPER.-
A,
NOTE. 41'
7101 Hal mh SILLaI. in Iw (P17) 829 3180
AREAS: 1
411.6" 73 04 IL
g5,w?:j& IL 2.42 .........
"'LL, Poo-I
F%P.w rm-a
RSP Architects, Ltd.
120 First Ave N Mos., UN 55401
Fm 612 309 6760 Ph 612 B 0513
m =
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
CFC C99155
Tic
?nnn
HWY 169 & 494
OFFICE TOWER
PRELIMINARY
PLAT
L
7
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
wrl r 63GLOOLOO
e� •
or
an mm
Al
\ PARKING
- - - - - --
OFFICE
\
BUILDING
Lnasl
LOT 1 I
\ \l
r
LOT
1�/
\
/
FARE M..00•l,.IC
\
100,
ml . w ."
w
\
I
7tFICK FAO7f U%ILu RAW
\
.
I
O[VBQAQI, DATA
r. um � •..� s low �•s�
R
, � _
.
s�iT
I
7
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
wrl r 63GLOOLOO
e� •
or
an mm
Al
i
l
� r
,
4Y
P -6,075
7- 17,176
6- 27,205
5- 27,20S
4- 27,205
3- 27,205
2- 27,205
26,192
FIRST FLOOR PLAN 185,468 G9 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
i
3RD THRU 6TH FLOOR PLANS
yp•.f-0'
SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN
19T -f4
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
w... r 6]6L60]AO
s•
ARCHRECTMAL K"
A2
J
7
l
3
-------° -- -ar --- --------
a nw ro or _ atiruu
mso Mm r.
rwr o.a
oar
SOUTH ELEVATION
if ..
a rw
3 ant.
OEM
om
EAST ELEVATION
FRAUENSHUH
COMPANIES
anti
m..s.�a
w
IULDNC 8"ATIONS
A3
I
i
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item:
Ill. D.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
City Planner
Information Only
❑
Date:
February 15,2000
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Conditional Use Permit.
- Action
❑
Motion
Our Lady of Grace. 5071
®
Resolution
Eden Avenue.
❑
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit
for Our Lady of Grace school.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans.
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
C -00 -1 Our Lady of Grace Church
6071 Eden Avenue
Request: . Expansion
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission in February, 1999, Our Lady of Grace
received a Conditional Use Permit to expand their school. That construction is now
complete and occupied. The church is now applying for a new permit to allow two smaller
additions to the older part of the school. The additions would provide a new library, a
computer lab, support rooms and an elevator. In addition, other accessibility
improvements would be undertaken. The library addition would occupy a portion of the
inner courtyard of the older part of the school. The elevator. addition is located on the
north side of the same building.
The proposed additions comply with all zoning ordinance standards, and the added
rooms do not trigger the need for additional parking. The proposed exterior materials
would match the existing building.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit for Our
Lady of Grace church.
The development team for Our-Lady of Grace church were present to respond to
questions.
Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval.
Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
m
0
nfz-�
CONDITIONAL USE
NUMBER C -00 -1
L O C A T 10 N 5071 Eden Avenue
REQUEST Building Expansion
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�±. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
k
JANUARY 26, 2000
STAFF REPORT
C -00 -1 Our Lady of Grace Church
5071 Eden Avenue
Request: Expansion
February,. 1999, Our Lady of Grace received a Conditional Use Permit to expand
their school. That construction is now complete and occupied. The church is now
applying for a new permit to allow two smaller additions to the older part of the school.
The additions would provide a new library, a computer lab, support rooms and an elevator.
In addition, other accessibility improvements would be undertaken. The Library addition
would occupy a portion of the inner courtyard of the older part of the school. The elevator
addition is located on the north side of the same building.
The proposed additions comply with all zoning ordinance standards, and the added
rooms do not trigger the need for additional parking. The proposed exterior materials
would match the existing building.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit for Our Lady of Grace
church.
-1.
OUR LADY OF GRACE EDINA. MINNESOTA
ELEVATOR & LIBRARY ADDITION
PROTECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
Station 19 Architects, Inc.
2001 University Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414
PH:(612) 623 -1800
FAX(612) 623 -0012
EMAIL: stationl9 @aol.com
DESIGN BUILDER
Opus NW Construction Corp.
10350 Bren Road West
Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9002
P14012) 656 -4444
FAX(612) 656 -4529
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
TI.1 TITLE SHEET
LILI SITE/ LANDSCAPE PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL
A1.1
OVERALL SITE PLAN
AIA
SITE PLAN & SURVEY
A2.1
LOWER LEVEL DEMOLMON PLAN
A2.2
MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
A3.1
LOWER LEVEL PLAN
A3.2
MAIN LEVEL PLAN
A4.1
LOWER LEVEL CEILING PLAN
A4.2
MAIN LEVEL CEILING PLAN
AS *1
ROOF PLAN
A6.1
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A6.2
BUI.DINGSECTIONS
A7.1
WALL SECTIONS
AILI
WALL TYPES & DETAILS
A9.1
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AI0.1
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A11.1
MILLWORK
A32.1
FRAMES TYPES & ELEVATIONS
STRUCTURAL
SI TITLE BLOCK
S1 FOUNDATION & MAIN LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
SI ROOF FRAMING PLAN
SI SEC1!0NS & DETAILS
SI SECTIONS & DETAILS
;TAT10N
NINETEEN
AnNbab•LrrP.bb!
AVE1 yMM W RY
MIE BDtlf1EABE
R�I�TfIIm'��
V1bY0 [yii flEiNllgM
acE
W�
REF. mom.
ibe -
k LADY
RACE
wnEEmA
E BLOCK
T1.1
r
AREA OF
ENLARGEMENT
NEW
ADDIT
91
, OVERALL SITE PLAN
,.1 1 .
STATION
NINETEEN
bieWYab•Iroapenrb
A01 V W.FMYTY
IIVEYR ®IINfAlT
YWNEY)TN YY.
Pu<N�T OI�NN
inE In1f �sm�i
,nw cm subYe
i sir«
nve�
0 OPUS.
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
imw,owcaoT�
OVERALL SITE
PLAN
A1.1I
p
91.6.6 am
917.9.
p 0175
7.4 IF 917.6
A
m7s �
visa vn.e
pies
IF e
918.6
- - - - - ----- - -' - -- --- - - - - --
�E1 x �OA'1 - 019.1 --
:vim r �o 0
e
r' a a9o.7
1\ S R
9131 \ ` .20. Ms s �
1
c O N c R E T E
918.1 919.3 1 on 's 221.2 921.2
L�&2 0 91 "IS 9:1.9 921.1
9ms 1 1 1 . AR 1.1 ` 0 0 0 0 ]�• 92SA MA
0183 910.1 MIA 1921.1
917.9 Ono
FF
l _.
�_
vlen mu
ul
. ..... ...._Y
-
91.6..611
t
e nee \
pAN
T00. e15
A
W. BOLIm9pVY1
91.0 0
p192
9188
D �'
919.6
_
915.1
v17 nn
9te.7 917D 1
017.1
pn,
eAl9
p
91.6.6 am
917.9.
p 0175
7.4 IF 917.6
A
m7s �
visa vn.e
pies
IF e
918.6
- - - - - ----- - -' - -- --- - - - - --
�E1 x �OA'1 - 019.1 --
:vim r �o 0
e
r' a a9o.7
1\ S R
9131 \ ` .20. Ms s �
1
c O N c R E T E
918.1 919.3 1 on 's 221.2 921.2
L�&2 0 91 "IS 9:1.9 921.1
9ms 1 1 1 . AR 1.1 ` 0 0 0 0 ]�• 92SA MA
0183 910.1 MIA 1921.1
917.9 Ono
FF
MIND RIGA, RIGA, P1 'e 918.:
�¢C1pL 017.7 TAPI i 11,1 - - - - - --
9T4•�.J a Iz AR 1 _ -9tB-' v1eA
i
TOP. 91e.4% 1 _
I DIV. 0.2.51 1
------ 917 -'� r I
9n.7
0 9113 i _ 918.2
rm
ans
IS APL ! eu.2 I 918.1
r
r I piss
rr I p
r I 918.1
sArc
- ens
c eve to 0.
r .wFU u
e17A r I Y
'019.0 CI 8 = A 919.0 C O M C N E 7 E ------ _MS ete2 p 91eA W 9193 e>YM e i p AG
9na -
-8je -- -
-- 9
0171 -- maA i
'AC 0, 9u.x pus
W u 919.6
918.3 Ou3 A91e]
010 9123 91A *M 11 ales 0 919.3 919.3 co.fvpE 0'.. IT 91as .e
IT
915.5 e19A
918.2 91ea p1eA 1
c V
919 s
91eA vlu
vuA 1
1 S,I7E PLAN AND SUt1VEY ••• rv--I _`�QOi^ryy -_
13 •1-0
L ........ ............. ............. ........ _.... .. ..... - .- ....... ..... ........... ._ ......... -, . ...... . .... ...... ....
STATION
NINETEEN
Aw91- •1KSry.1.Ye,
...EA9e.
AW ME -AFT
T
1712oe Ee7T2101else
® OPUS.
eau rY1o1.e9 mrlmm
1..royu eau
FI1.•. elsasa.w
.. .612.65.6.2x8
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
I
Fo.IA Y.NEBOIA
SRE PLAN AND
SURVEY
i
A1.2 �
vlen mu
ul
T00. e15
A
W. BOLIm9pVY1
91.0 0
p192
017.1 917.8 9
917.9 9
9111 9
FD R
R) 1
1 FD _
910.1
rm
ans
IS APL ! eu.2 I 918.1
r
r I piss
rr I p
r I 918.1
sArc
- ens
c eve to 0.
r .wFU u
e17A r I Y
'019.0 CI 8 = A 919.0 C O M C N E 7 E ------ _MS ete2 p 91eA W 9193 e>YM e i p AG
9na -
-8je -- -
-- 9
0171 -- maA i
'AC 0, 9u.x pus
W u 919.6
918.3 Ou3 A91e]
010 9123 91A *M 11 ales 0 919.3 919.3 co.fvpE 0'.. IT 91as .e
IT
915.5 e19A
918.2 91ea p1eA 1
c V
919 s
91eA vlu
vuA 1
1 S,I7E PLAN AND SUt1VEY ••• rv--I _`�QOi^ryy -_
13 •1-0
L ........ ............. ............. ........ _.... .. ..... - .- ....... ..... ........... ._ ......... -, . ...... . .... ...... ....
STATION
NINETEEN
Aw91- •1KSry.1.Ye,
...EA9e.
AW ME -AFT
T
1712oe Ee7T2101else
® OPUS.
eau rY1o1.e9 mrlmm
1..royu eau
FI1.•. elsasa.w
.. .612.65.6.2x8
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
I
Fo.IA Y.NEBOIA
SRE PLAN AND
SURVEY
i
A1.2 �
STATION
NINETEEN
Aw91- •1KSry.1.Ye,
...EA9e.
AW ME -AFT
T
1712oe Ee7T2101else
® OPUS.
eau rY1o1.e9 mrlmm
1..royu eau
FI1.•. elsasa.w
.. .612.65.6.2x8
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
I
Fo.IA Y.NEBOIA
SRE PLAN AND
SURVEY
i
A1.2 �
T
O
PLAN NOTES
1. ILL WNLT S 1O E TYPE 41➢IESS ODEPIWISE
NDTED.
L gE11iC.TEDCWIIt. TICK DA WMIE BD•M.
AND Gw6 P11TGi IFfECRD N TO WTCY ECSIDA.
EECTEU OPENNDG, ldiLL WDN YATDNIY. P11TLM
�. IFFECTEU AFIEA4
=J
• m
• III
no• h •` -, irm � ,
a
J N'
IPre• •cxeaL ew
�,
STATION
NINETEEN
•YEymE0.Li.
YUE ®IIDEA•T
PLANE djl'i.
1
i
r r.0
0 opus.
OPU•ib•n•PCuuwWr•
Gogorebi
YYwI� Do•E��•
oiYa Y 1611P
Pbr: EI ?N6iW
f,c OIt�656.Si•
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
FOW yii(pT.
LOWER LEVEL PLAN !
I
YRCYlTT0.
0
•
�pT� fl Md'
Y
° a,.un�ooY.n
n�i•s •f
Eua
�,
STATION
NINETEEN
•YEymE0.Li.
YUE ®IIDEA•T
PLANE djl'i.
1
i
r r.0
0 opus.
OPU•ib•n•PCuuwWr•
Gogorebi
YYwI� Do•E��•
oiYa Y 1611P
Pbr: EI ?N6iW
f,c OIt�656.Si•
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
FOW yii(pT.
LOWER LEVEL PLAN !
I
r
r
Mull
ff
PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WALL TYPES TOM TYPE 8 MEW OTIEXWISE
MTED.
. E—TTEDCMYR TAbC fsi WI.TE BO4R
1 o1E IMS. YTW AFFE EMMFIE tr T W1 W EMS
N1E 6WB. PATCH KEECTED NEA9 TD WTCH E■STINd
l W E).SDM DPE106A I/AL WRM IIASNAY. PA101
KEECTED WEAi
I
o-
A 17,
f 12
°
A
NEBEE
�-�
1
• .,
Hill
F
r
Mull
ff
PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WALL TYPES TOM TYPE 8 MEW OTIEXWISE
MTED.
. E—TTEDCMYR TAbC fsi WI.TE BO4R
1 o1E IMS. YTW AFFE EMMFIE tr T W1 W EMS
N1E 6WB. PATCH KEECTED NEA9 TD WTCH E■STINd
l W E).SDM DPE106A I/AL WRM IIASNAY. PA101
KEECTED WEAi
I
o-
A 17,
f 12
°
NEBEE
�-�
• .,
Hill
Pill
No
TATION
NINETEEN
Al.nu..Y•uYame..re
Em• W�rEY,.
AYE.uE •ENT
µEY1EA.KKS.
En
Rtl1E pRl C1.•1oE
,Hm CRY NYIS .
Ev.lmlw Y1.r..5!]U
P.�s101:=w�ina �
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
Eow YOrEnu
=LEVEL PLAN
I
I
L............
x 5011TH ELEVATION ru-1 @5!T ELEVATION 0 LIBRARY ADDITION r=
I
FAST ELEVATION 0 ELEVATOR
. . ................ . .. . ................. ............ ....
STATION
NINETEEN
onw.ain.r carom..
OUR LADY
OF GRACE
i;iTiRlon
ELEVATIONS
A6.1
4
°(� 100) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
0
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item:
Iv. A.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
City Planner
Information Only
❑
Date:
February 15, 2000
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Amend Ordinance 850 by
Action
❑
Motion
adding certain drive thrus
❑
Resolution
as accessory uses in the
®
Ordinance
PCD -1 district.
0
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached amendment to
the Planned Commercial District section of the Zoning Ordinance which adds certain
drive through facilities as accessory uses in the PCD -1 district.
Info /Background:
Following preliminary approval for the development by the Haugland
Companies, staff reviewed existing requirements for drive through facilities. In the
section listing permitted uses the ordinance specifically prohibits drive through facilities
for restaurants and financial institutions. Thus, suggesting that drive through facilities
for other permitted uses are allowed. We believe this to be the intent of the ordinance.
However, the ordinance does not list drive through facilities as permitted accessory
uses in the PCD -1 district. The attached amendment is designed to clarify this gray
area of the ordinance.
EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 20004
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850 OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING
CERTAIN DRIVE THROUGH FACILITIES AS ACCESSORY USES IN THE PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, PCD =1.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subdivision 6 of Subsection 850.16 of the City Code is hereby amended by
adding the following accessory use in PCD -1:
"Drive through facilities, except those accessory to i) financial institutions, and
ii) food establishments as defined in Section 720 of the City Code."
Section 2. Effective Date This ordinance shall be in full effect upon passage and
publication.
Adopted this 15TH day of February, 2000.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in Edina Sun Current:
Attest
City Clerk
Mayor
TO:
FROM.
VIA:
SUBJECT.
AGENDA ITEM. v (A)
DATE: 02/10/00
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CHIEF MICHAEL SIITARI
GORDON HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Five (5) full -size Police squad cars, Police Interceptor model,
Crown Victoria
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. Superior Ford 1. $ 106,635
2. 2.
3. 3.
RECOMMENDED BID:
State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Agreement. No. 424587
GENERAL INFORMATION:
* Replacement vehicles to be used as first -line patrol vehicles fora minimum of two (2)
years.
* Ford is the only manufacturer of full -size squad cars at this time.
Signature
Department
The recommended bid is: (within budget) (not within budget)
Gordon Hugh s, Oty Manager
JjAin Wallin, Finance Director
491N�A,r
Wi���zz
,,
v� � �y
MOR
TO:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
FROM: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: February 15, 2000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Dodge Dakota Pickup 4x4
Company
1. Olivia Chrysler Center (MN State 2000 Contract # 17)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
AGENDA ITEM V -B
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $19,053.00
2.$
3.$.
4.$
5.$
Olivia Chrysler Center $19,053.00
GENERAL INFORMATION: This vehicle would be purchased with Fire Department equipment
replacement funds. The vehicle would be on a ten -year replacement schedule. This truck
would replace a 1990 Chevrolet Lumina.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Depa
not within budget
201( l
`Gor on Hughes,
Fire
a Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Marty Scheerer; Fire Chief
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: February 15, 2000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: GMC Safari Van AWD
Company
1. Falls Automotive (Minnesota State 2000 Contract # 424724)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
AGENDA ITEM V -C
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $20,140.00
2.$
3.$
4.$
5.$
Falls Automotive $20,140.00
GENERAL. INFORMATION: This vehicle would be purchased with Fire Department equipment
replacement funds. The vehicle would be on a ten -year replacement schedule. The van would
replace a 1990 Chevrolet Blazer 4x4.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Fire
Department
not within budget
Manager
n/ e
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 15 February, 2000
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
AGENDA ITEM V.D.
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Premier Aggregates 1. $ 3.25/Ton
2. Bury & Carlson 2. $ 4.58/Ton
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Premier Aggregates $ 3.25/Ton
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is an annual bid to crush old concrete and asphalt that is collected during the previous year. This
material is crushed and recycled into various Public Works jobs during the next season. The crushing
is funded through the Public Works Street Department budget.
Signatur
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within bu
Public Works - Streets
Department
,. ._In.
, Fin�r)ce CQ,irector
on Hughes, 04y Manager
�glza. j� AGENDA ITEM: v (E)
e DATE: 02/10/00
En
o
H
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHIEF MICHAEL SHTARI
VIA: GORDON HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Annual Purchase — Police Uniforms and Equipment
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1. $ 792.40
2. CY'S UNIFORMS 2. $ 864.50
3. STREICHER'S 3. Did not offer all uniform
requirements & variety
needed to fit officers.
RECOMMENDED BID: UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This request is for an open purchase order to supply police uniforms and equipment for one (1)
year beginning 3/1/2000. The total purchases are not expected to exceed $30,000. Bids were
taken on a representative sample of uniform items expected to be purchased in an average
year. Uniforms Unlimited is our present supplier and has been for many years. Streicher's
uniform selection is very limited and does not have several of the items that we use.
( � _
"N4 its
Si ature Department
The recom nded b' is: (within budget) (not within budget)
>>
G rdon Hug e , C ty Manager Job lin, Fin an i for
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM. v (F)
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CHIEF MICHAEL SHTARI
GORDONHUGHES, CITYMANAGER
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
02/10/00
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One (1) Chevrolet Impala
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. GROSSMAN CHEVROLET 1. $ 18,572.00
2.
2.
3.
3.
RECOMMENDED BID:
State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Agreement No. 424589
GENERAL INFORMATION:.
* Replacement of unmarked Investigative squad 26 -197 per equipment replacement
schedule.
Sign re
Department
The recommended bid' : (within budget) (not within budget)
Gordon Hughe , City Manager John lin, Finance Wrector
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000
February 8, 2000
AGENDA ITEM . V.G.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Wooddale Park Playground Site Improvements
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Koolmo Construction 1. $119,410.00
2. Odland Construction, Inc. 2.$120,8143.00
3. Arrigoni Brothers Co. 3. $124,390.00
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Koolmo Construction
Account #:P037 -4901
$119,410.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase and installation of playground equipment for Wooddale Park. Bids were
opened on Thursday, February 3, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. Staff is recommending Koolmo
Construction as lowest responsible bidder. The playground equipment design was a result of
a Wooddale Park neighborhood committee. Installation should be complete by August 1, 2000.
John K9f dos, Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
not within
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
WaMin. Finance Director
Gordon Hi(gVes, City Manager
o e
J � �o
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
February 8, 2000
AGENDA ITEM V.H.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Annual Fertilizer Purchase for Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Courses
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. North Star Turf Supply 1. $23,770.80
2. Hennepin County Bid #0242A9 2•
3. 3.
4. 4.
5 5•
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #:0664 -4558 (80 %)
0670 -4558 (20 %)
North Star Turf Supply $23,770.80
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of the annual supply of fertilizer for Braemar and Fred Richards
Golf Courses. The fertilizer is for greens, fairways and tees for the golf courses
(45 holes of golf). This purchase is made through Hennepin County bid to assure
the lowest possible price.
Edina Park and Recreation
John K9600s, Director Department
This Recommended bid is
within budget not within budV � J01i nWAiqFjnance Director
Gordon Hughey; jCity Manager
o e
• .,,._ _moo �
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: February 4, 2000 AGENDA ITEM V.I.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Four (4) Greensmaster 3100 Greensmowers
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. MTI Distributing Co. 1. $54,430.00
2. Tri State Companies 2. $60,603.00
3. 3. $
4. 4.$
5. 5.$
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
MTI Distributing Co.
Account #:0027 -1340
$54,430.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of four (4) new Greenmaster 3100 Greensmowers less trade -in of 4
greensmowers for Braemar Golf Course. This expenditure is funded under the Braemar Golf
Course capital budget.
J ,Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
not within budReO X I �Oin, Finance Director
Gordon H%es, City Manager
'4,91N�1r
1
o e
v � !
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Vi.A.
From: Vince Bongaarts Consent
Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑
Date: 15 February, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review Action ❑ Motion
of February 1, 2000 ❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve Traffic Safety'Staff Review of February 1, 2000.
a
,a
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2000
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 1, 2000. Staff present
included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the Assistant City Engineer, the Public
Works Traffic Control Specialist and the Traffic Safety Coordinator.
From that review, the below'recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
February 15, 2000, Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
There has been a request from the City of Minneapolis and the Pinehurst
Development people for some street and parking rearrangements in the 50th &
France Area during the construction of the Pinehurst property on the northeast
corner of W. 501h Street & France Avenue..
They were requesting:
a. Signage to direct truck traffic northbound on France to go west on W. 51St
Street and then back east on W.'50th Street.
b. Se�arate signal phases for all directions of traffic at the intersection of W.
50t Street and France Avenue.
c. Barricades to block off part of the street from W: 49 1/2 Street to around the
corner at, 50th & France on the Minneapolis side, necessitating no parking
on the Edina side from W. 49 1/2 Street to W. 50th Street.
The staff, after reviewing the Minneapolis /Pinehurst requests and discussions
with the -Edina merchants affected, made the following recommendations to the
City Council:
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 1, 2000
Page 2
Staff Recommendations
No signage etc directing truck traffic northbound on France Avenue,
south of W. 51St Street to go west on W. 51St Street and then back eas
W. 50`n Street.
2. No separate signal phase for east/west traffic on W. 5. 01h Street at France
Avenue. Use together with left turn bans as needed...
3. "No Left Turns" posted for both eastbound and westbound W. 50th Street
traffic at France Avenue.
4. Cut angle on barricades on northeast corner of W. 50th Street and France
Avenue to allow for access and better turn movements westbound to
northbound.
5. Cut width /angle of barricades on east side of France Avenue at W. 49'/2
Street to allow for left turn northbound to westbound and through lane.
6. Have a loading zone on west side of France Avenue Oust south of W. 49'/2
Street as exists today modified for certain construction events.
7. Remove parking slots on east side of France Avenue from W. 49'/2 Street
north for an additional two spaces to facilitate movement northbound.
8. Remove parking on France Avenue between 49th and 49'/2 Street from
2/15/00 to 10/1 /00.
This information has been reviewed with Marty Rud of Lund Properties and Lee
Weisman, both board members at 50th & France Association.
The above recommendations were presented to the Edina City Council meeting
and approved.
2. On March 2, 1999, the City sent Hennepin County a letter requesting a traffic
study and signal review for Xerxes Avenue, CSAH 31, to include the
intersections of Heritage Drive and W. 64th Street.
This request was generated after a fatal accident occurred on June 21St, 1998.
The accident generated several petitions with approximately 700 signatures
asking the City to do something about the intersection at Heritage Drive and
Xerxes Avenue.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 1, 2000
Page 3
A letter was received back from Hennepin County on 3/31/99 regarding the
request. A copy of that letter is attached to this tr whether or not
they would collect data at W. 64 and Xerxes to determine
technical warrants are met for traffic control devices.
The City Engineering staff have recently learned.that a study has been
completed and the intersection does meet some warrants for a traffic control
device. In fact, the intersection at W. 64th Street.and Xerxes Avenue ranks
higher than the' intersection at Vernon Avenue and Gleason Road for acquiring
traffic control devices.
The staff recommends that the City Council send a letter to Hennepin County
asking them for their current plans regarding CSAH 31 (Xerxes Avenue ) betwe
Hinhwav 62 and W. 66th Street.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
Request for "No Turn on Red " - restrictions for Hazelton Road westbound traffic at
France Avenue and France Avenue northbound traffic at Hazelton Road.
The request comes from bus commuters who cross France Avenue at Hazelton.
to catch the southbound France Avenue bus in the morning and return on the .
northbound bus in the evening. The northbound bus stops north of the Hazelton
intersection because of a right ommuteas come from b he York Plaza Apartmen s to
go east on Hazelton. The c
area to the south of the Yorktown Shopping Mall.
The requestors say that the traffic is paying no attention to pedestrians. and it is
very difficult to cross Hazelton.
The requestors will be advised to use the pedestrian path from the York Plaza
Apartments area to the France Avenue the Gallagher and would be a
stop. This path runs dust to the south o f Da
y tons Home Store
more direct and safer route.
The staff recommends denial of the "No Turn on Red" restrictions at France
Avenue and Hazelton Road and encourages use of the safer more direct route to
France Avenue and Gallagher Drive.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 1, 2000
Page 4
2. Request to improve the line of sight for traffic on southbound Browndale Avenue
turning right to go west on W. 501h Street.
Requestor's daughter had an accident on 11/06/98 at 8:40 PM when she turned
right from southbound Browndale Avenue to go west on W. 50th Street. The
daughter said that she never saw the car coming west on W. 501h Street. The
requestors feel that the bridge that goes over the creek at this point blocks the
view of any traffic westbound on W. 501h Street for -a short period of time from
the traffic waiting to go west on W. 50th Street from Browndale Avenue.
Observations made at this intersection indicate that if a vehicle stops short of the
"Stop" sign posted on Browndale Avenue at W. 50th Street, the view of oncoming
traffic on westbound W. 50th Street could be blocked. However, if the vehicle on
Browndale pulls up to the "Stop" sign there is no blockage of the view of
oncoming westbound W. 50th Street traffic.
The accident history was reviewed for this intersection back to 1991. There have
been 24 property damage accidents and 9 personal injury accidents in the area
of this intersection, but only two of them were connected to westbound traffic on
W. 50th Street (the requestor's accident on 11/06/98 at 8:40 PM and an accident
on 6/18/99 at 7:34 PM.), versus Browndale traffic pulling out from the "Stop" sign.
The staff upon review, feels there is no evidence to indicate a need for any
changes at this intersection.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
1. Request for "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at France Avenue and Minnesota
Drive.
Requestors would like the signs for southbound France Avenue traffic at
Minnesota Drive and also for westbound Minnesota Drive traffic at France
Avenue.
Requestors say that the signs are especially needed during the afternoon rush
hours. The traffic gets backed up from 1 -494 and the ramp metering, and
because of the backup, the traffic tends to block up the intersection at France
and Minnesota Drive when the signal light changes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 1, 2000
Page 5
Observations showed this to be happening day.
a regular basis during afternoon
rush hours but not during other tim es of the
Request has been referred to Hennepin County for review.
2. W. 76th. Street & York Avenue signal update request.
Requestors desire that York & 76th signal be updated to add left u n rn lanes with and
signals for westbound and eastbound W. 76 Street. Staff is 9
Hennepin County and SRF on this issue.
RECAP: TRAFFIC SAFETY 1.999
During 1999, the Traffic Safety Coordinator received 185 calls or contacts
regarding traffic and traffic related concerns in the .City. This was the highest
number of calls since 1993 when the Traffic Safety Coordinator's position was
implemented.
Of the 185 calls /contacts, 106 were referred to other agencies such
Department, or Hennep
handled oin
County, to other City departments such as the Police
a one - to -one basis between the contact and the Traffic Safety Coordinator.
The remaining 79 contacts were researched/investigated by the Traffic discussion
y
Coorinator and referred to the City staff Traffic Safety
and recommendations to the City Council.
The City staff members of the Traffic Safety Committee consisted of the City
Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, the Chief of Police, the City Planner, the
Public Works Traffic Control Specialist, and the Traffic Safety stet Coordi istanc Of
two separate occasions in 1999, the Committee also
SRF, a private engineering consulting firm, in dealing with the Maple Road and
Parkwood Knolls areas.
The majority of the concerns were directed at the volume me from speed f duals on
City residential streets. Most of the concerns /requests Several
rather than groups such as the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood group.
of the requests'were repeat requests by. the same individuals
most p ears past
that
whose requests had been denied. These requ.e stirs for the
the source of their problems /concerns were created by cut - through traffic from
ramp metering and congested main roads.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 1, 2000
Page 6
Observations and traffic surveys of these concerns found that the volume of
traffic was increasing in some areas of the City but not just because of the cut -
through traffic created by ramp metering and congested main roads. There has,
also been an increase in the trips generated by residential units, and people
servicing these units for whatever reason. The workforce in Edina is larger than
the residential population and getting larger, and that also contributes to more
traffic with legitimate use of Edina Streets.
Where there used to be just an AM and PM traffic rush hour, there is now also a
lunch time rush hour between 11:30 AM and 1:00 PM. In some areas of the City
there is more traffic during the lunch hour than there is during the AM rush hour.
In 1999, 44 week -long volume /speed traffic surveys were conducted of mainly
residential streets. These surveys found that speeds overall were not as high as
perceived. In most cases the complainants felt it was mainly the cut - through
traffic causing the problem and ,not the local residents. However, the speed
surveys showed that the 85 percentiles were as high on Saturday and Sunday if
not higher, than during the Monday through Friday period.
As a cure for their problems with traffic many of the requestors felt that the best
solution would be the installation of "Stop" signs and felt that even if not
everyone stopped completely, it would slow them down. There was a request for
30 "Stop" signs in 1999.
There is also a contention by many parents, especially those that live in areas
without sidewalks, that the street is a designated play area for their children.
There have been several cases where the parents have put orange cones or
other devices in the street to alert drivers.
In the year 2000, the traffic concerns will be with us more than ever. There is a
move by some individuals in the metro area to get the legislature to allow
municipalities to lower the speed limit to 25 mph in residential areas..
Th bottom line is that the traffic is not going away and we are going to have to
learn to live with it the best we can. The traffic is generated by many things and
there is nothing in the near future that is going to alleviate it.
"Traffic Calming ", has been touted as a solution for some traffic problems in
residential neighborhoods. However, it has been found to be very expensive
and in many cases, rejected by the very people that wanted it after trial runs.
As some of our younger generation might put it; "In Edina, the'automobile rules ".
Hennepj n o u.n� qual Opportuni(; EmplayeLr
r
f
March 31, 1999
Mr. Vince Bongaarts
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mr. Bongaarts:
This letter is in response to your March 2, 1999 letter about three intersections. The purpose of this letter
is to provide a response where we can, and to let you know that we are obtaining field data to answer the
remaining questions.
CSAH 31 at Heritage Drive and/or West 64th Street
Reference is made to a petition that asks for signalization, crosswalks, and restriction of turning
movements from eastbound Heritage Drive to northbound CSAH 31. Past experience has shown it to be
hazardous to have a signal or an all -way stop in close proximity to another signalized intersection like at
the south ramp to Crosstown Highway. Thus, the county could not support signalization at the
intersection of Heritage Drive.
Indeed, we too would be supportive of the elimination of the eastbound Heritage Drive to northbound
CSAH 31 movement. In the short term, we could attempt to restrict such movement by signage.
However, to be effective and to minimize the enforcement effort, it may eventually be necessary for the
city to construct a raised island to preclude movements other than right -in, right -out only movements. We
expect that a related consideration for the city would be that restricting the movements at Heritage Drive
would result in diversion of traffic to York Avenue and West 64th Street.
If further traffic control (a signal or an all -way stop) is to be provided on CSAH 31 it would need to be
located at West 64th Street. Since we find that a signal at Heritage Drive would be unacceptable, we will
be collecting data at West 64th Street to determine whether or not the technical "warrants" are met for
traffic control devices. We will report our results to you. Thereafter we can have discussion on what, if
any, further actions should be pursued.
Mention is made in your letter about crosswalks and bus stops. Generally, pedestrian crossings of streets
are permissible at intersections except where specifically prohibited. Where there is pedestrian activity in
relatively close proximity to a busy intersection, like the Crosstown Highway, it may be desirable to
provide a painted crosswalk. The county's practice is that if requested by a city (ies), and where
appropriate, the county makes the initial installation of a crosswalk provided the city (ies) commit to future
maintenance (e.g. repainting).
Transportation Department
1600 Prairie Drive Recycled Paper
Medina, MN 55340 -5421
(612) 745 -7500 FAX: (612) 478 -4000 TDD: (612) 852 -6760
o e
•'��URPOMT °//
IB8B
Project Number: Date: 9- Feb -00
Telephone No.: 745 -7740 Time: 6:45
Person Contactei Jerry Smrka
Organization: Hennepin County
Location: Medina
Project Name: York and 76th Street
Subject: East -West Turn Bays
TELECON
REPORT
® AM DINCOMIN
❑ PM ❑OUTGO
Routin
.!;, .
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
VI.B.
From:
Eric Anderson
i
El
Assistant City Manager
Information Only
El
Date:
February 15, 2000
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
VI.B.
From:
Eric Anderson
Consent
El
Assistant City Manager
Information Only
El
Date:
February 15, 2000
Mgr. Recommends
El
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
US West Wireless Request
®
Motion
For Antenna Co- location at
❑
Resolution
Gleason Road and
El
Ordinance
Braemar Boulevard
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve antenna co- location and lease terms
INFO /BACKGROUND:
US West Wireless has requested to co- locate on a civil defense tower on the west side
of Gleason Road approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of Gleason Road and
Braemar Boulevard. Their request is to replace the 45 foot pole with a new 64 foot
pole. The installation would be the same style of pole as the Blake Road and Fox
Meadow Lane tower. The financial terms would be identical to the Blake/Fox
Meadow tower except that US West will pay for a new civil defense siren for the site
since the larger height will require a bigger siren to accommodate coverage area. Staff
will have a presentation describing the proposal and reviewing the lease terms. US
West Wireless will have a representative at the meeting for any questions you may
have.
V
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
VI.C.
From: Francis J. Hoffman
Consent
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date: 15 February, 2000
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: No Parking Resolution
Action
❑ Motion
For Highway /City
® Resolution
Project BA -315
❑ Ordinance
F-1
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve NO PARKING ANY TIME resolution for W. 77th Street from Metro Boulevard to
Computer Avenue
Info /Background:
The City and Mn /DOT are completing plans for W. 77th and TH 100 interchange
upgrades. Part of the items necessary for plan approval is a no parking resolution.
Currently, no parking is allowed, but the restriction must be in a resolution format per
State requirements. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
RESOLUTION
RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
City of Edina
S.A.P. 120 - 136 -13 (W. 77th Street) from Metro Boulevard to Computer Avenue, in the
City of Edina, Minnesota.
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 15th day of February, 2000, by the City of _.
Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be
called the "City ", WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City ", has planned the improvement of MSAS 136, W. 77th
Street from Metro Boulevard to Computer Avenue.
WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the
improvement of this Street, and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on
both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State
Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED:
That the "City ", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS
136, W. 77th Street from Metro Boulevard to Computer Avenue, at all times.
Dated this 15th day of February, 2000.
ATTEST: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394
CITY CLERK
MAYOR
(612) 927 -8861
FAX (612) 826 -0390
TDD (612) 826 -0379
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: February 15, 2000
Subject: Confirm School Board
Reappointment to Human
Relations Commission
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # VI.D.
Consent
Information Only F]
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
FI Resolution
❑ Ordinance
F] Discussion
Recommendation:
Confirm the action of the Edina School Board re- appointing Betsy Flaten to the Human
Relations Commission for a term ending February 1, 2003.
Info/Background:
The Edina School District re- appointed Betsy Flaten to a three year term on the Edina
Human Relations Commission at their meeting February 7, 2000. Edina Code specifies
that the School District appoint six commissioners to the Commission. Their
appointments need confirmation by the City Council.
-t A
s
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI.E.
From: Francis Hoffmawyl Consent
City Engineer Information Only
Date: February 15, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Annual Bridge Certification Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
I-1 Discussion
Recommendation: Review report.
Info /Background:
The City Engineer is required to have all City bridges and culverts of a certain size to be
inspected and certify to the State that the inspections were completed. There are twenty -five
bridges and culverts that currently are inspected annually or officially every second year based
on design and age. One structure, the Soo Line Bridge over W. 44`h Street is not owned by the
City, but the State requires the City to inspect it because it is over a City street. In the past,
staff has written to both the State officials and railroad officials regarding this structure. It is an
old structure that the railroad officially maintains that it is adequate for rail use. Staff continues
to suggest that additional maintenance work should be done to prolong the life of the structure.
In 1999, the City inspected twenty -five structures.
Finally, two structures of the twenty -five need to be replaced or refurbished in the next few
years. The Browndale bridge currently has a weight restriction and is in need of refurbishing
and reconstruction. Staff has started preliminary engineering work on the Browndale bridge.
Also, the W. 56`h Street bridge over Minnehaha Creek should be scheduled for refurbishing or
replacement as soon as the Browndale bridge is completed. Staff would seek State bridge
bonding funds for both since neither bridge is on a street which is state aid eligible. Both of
these structures plus the railroad bridge will receive additional review this spring. Also, staff is
working with SRF, our bridge consultant, to develop a final proposal to request state bridge
bonding funds.
,i
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman -
Director of Public Works
Date:. 15 February, 2000
Subject: Transportation Funding
Year 2000
Legislation Objectives
Recommendation:
Agenda Item
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
# VI.F.
❑ To H RA
® To Council
❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Support a transportation funding proposal that would cover the points in the attached
resolution.
Info /Background:
For the first time in many years, a transportation funding proposal of considerable size
is being proposed. The attached graphic demonstrates the basics of the legislative
bills. Staff suspects it will change to some degree during the session. As background,
Edina Public Works staff has been active on the Technical Advisory Committee JAC)
of Metropolitan Council for most of the 1980's and 1990's. Mr. Hoffman has served and
now Mr. Houle is serving on this committee. This committee reviews transportation
issues prior to their arrival to Metropolitan Council's Transportation Advisory Board.
During staffs time of involvement, no other funding proposal has come forward with this
much impact. The Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) has never found its way into
transportation areas as it was envisioned during its creation.
The current proposal transfers MVET funds to replace a tab fee reduction in the
highway user tax distribution fund. It creates a new multi -modal transportation fund of
approximately $250 million dollars. Staff expects that the tab fee reduction and the new
multi -modal will receive a considerable amount of debate.
Report/Recommendation
Agenda Item VI.F.
Page Two
House File 2891, Chief Author Flynn and Senate File 2078, Chief Author Molnau, are
the bills related to the proposal. Staff has copies for review if necessary.
The staff would recommend passing the attached generic resolution to indicate the
City's support for the increased funding level. Staff attributes a considerable amount of
Edina's traffic woes to a lack of State funding in the recent years on the major metro
infrastructure.
Staff will have additional data available at the Council meeting if Council wishes to
discuss this matter.
Transportation Funding Proposal
Met CLM il �; o
$6
Multi Modal
Mn/DOT rTransportation 46 °0 245M * **
Multi Modal Fund
Transportation
Fund
S1 84M 74o;o
-- — — — — — — — — — —+
1 (ireater MN Transit Capital 1
& Service Expansion
1 Busways 1
1 Interregional Corridors 1
1 Bottlenecks 1
1 Right of Way Preservation 1
Partnership Facilities
-- — — — — — — — — — —
+
MR,
Other
*
Constitutionally prescribed allocations
*'
Constitutionally dedicated
* ** Statutorily dedicated
Motor
Vehicle
Excise Tax
54% S291M **
Fuel Vehicle Taxes
Tax ** & Fees, Misc
Revenue **
4275N1 Tab Red.
Highway User Tax
Distribution Fund **
Drivers Investment
License Inc. Other
State Trunk
Highway Fund*
29% W!,
County Municipal Debt Ops., Maint.,
State Aid* State Aid* Senlice Construction
Support
Federal
.did
Public
Safety
Other Dept
Highway
Construction
Program
O l i 24i 2000
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING COALITION
YEAR 2000 LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIONS
• We support constitutional dedication of 100% of the motor vehicle sales tax to
transportation.
• We support an immediate one -time investment of state funds to jump -start
any longer -term transportation funding effort, and we support earmarking a
significant portion of the current state budget surplus to begin the
commitment this year.
• We support a long -term approach to transportation funding needs, and we
commend the Governor for making a long -term funding proposal.
• We support a balance transportation package that addresses the statewide
needs of highways and transit.
• We support a major effort to address bridge deficiencies across the state.
• We encourage policy- makers to investigate creative new approaches to
funding transportation infrastructure.
• We support a Gallup Poll to seek grassroots input to an initiative labeled
"KEEP MINNESOTA MOVING - SPEED UP TRANSPORTATION FUNDING"
COUNCIL CHECK -- JISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:
_ _j page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207560
02/15/00
$516.25
Accountemps
Temp. Acct.
01845883
FINANCE
PROF'SERVICES
< *>
$516.25*
207561
02/15/00
$1,064.94
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
Mailing Service
83963
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
02/15/00
$251.76
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
Mail Service
83979
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,316.70*
207562
02/15/00
$308.53
ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM
Toner Cartridges
026337
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL,SUPPLI
4614
< *>
$308.53*
207563
02/15/00
$28.43
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
Telephone
012000
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
$427.44
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
Patrol
020300
PATROL
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
$183.13
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
Admin /Invest
.020300
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
.$35.63
Airtouch Cellular Bellev-ACO
020300
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$674.63*
.
207564
02/15/00
$450.00
ALBERG WATER SERVICES
Remove & Reset Motor
11250
PUMP & LIFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
530.4
< *>
$450.00*
207565
02/15/00
$4.69
ALBINSON
Maps
C17247
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5226
02/15/00
$3.83
ALBINSON
Blueline Print
C17248
PAMELA PK /LK S
CIP
4620
< *>
$8.52*
207566
02/15/00
- $63.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
00016754
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$147.20
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
00012551
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$18.40
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
00018318
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$98.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
00018323
50TH ST.SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$402.30
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
00014611
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$602.90*
207567
02/15/00
$20.00
AMEM
Civil Defense
020400
CIVIL DEFENSE
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$20.00*
207568
02/15/00
$60.00
American Ambulance Assoc
3 -Yr. Subscription
to
020700
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$60.00*
207569
02/15/00
$248.21
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
.0131
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$19.15
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
01 -31
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$119.26
Ameripride Linen & Appar
.LAUNDRY
01/31
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$167.21
Ameripride Linen & Appar
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01/31
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$63.90
Ameripride Linen & Appar
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0131.
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$154.74
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
0131.
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$236.71
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
013100
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$191.70
Ameripride Linen & Appar
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$223.60
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
1 -31 -00
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
< *>
$1,424.48*
207570
02/15/00
$4.73
ANCHOR PAPER
Paper for Chamber
S2601430
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMODITIES
< *>
$4.73*
207571
02/15/00
$150.59
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Visar Battery, Belt
C
23055
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
5159
02/15/00
$135.00
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Radio Rapair
7060
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
7060
< *>
$285.59*
207572
02/15/00
$42.56
Anderson, Merle
Reimbursement for
Cof
020400
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
- - - - --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$42.56*
207573
02/15/00
$44.68
Arena Systems
Log Book
AS2283
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2269
< *>
$44.68*
207574
02/15/00
$119.58
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
headlamp
479591
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5287
< *>
$119.58*
207576
02/15/00
$141.27
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$332.02
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$332.01
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$92.64
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$21.70
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
FIRE SUPPLIES
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$506.17
.Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$43.40
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
GOLF DOME
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$45.77
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL.
020100
MAINT OF COURS
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$196.42
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$72.99
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$69.70
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$681.45
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$76.40
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$83.17
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$23.99
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH
REMOVA
02/15/00
$36.56
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020100
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOVA
< *>
$2,755.66*
207577
02/15/00
$294.05
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
Grant - CDPD
012400
COPS MORE GRAN
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$294.05*
207578
02/15/00
$10.75
AT &T Wireless
TELEPHONE
011600
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$10.75*
207579
02/15/00
$101.18
Auto Electric Of Bloomin
Repair Parts
113733
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
2079
< *>
$101.18*
207580
02/15/00
$143.00
AWWA
Water Conservation Ta
137739 -A
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5299
< * >-
$143.00*
207581
02/15/00
$73.72
BACHMANS
Tree Wrap
012000
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5932
< *>
$73:72*
207582
02/15/00
$564.00
-BARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY
Picnic Table
01000006
PW BUILDING
REPAIR
PARTS
5464
< *>
$564.00*
207583
02/15/00
$87.42
BATTERIES PLUS
Batteries
F51 -8083
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5096
02/15/00
- $159.72
BATTERIES PLUS
Batteries Returned
F5 -13076
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
02/15/00
$42.94
BATTERIES PLUS
Batteries
F5 -14560
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5330
02/15/00
$44.70
BATTERIES PLUS
Battery & Holder
F5 -15523
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5330
02/15/00
$42.59
BATTERIES_PLUS
Batteries, Cordless T
F5 -16683
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL.SUPPLI
5480
< *>
$57.93*
207584
02/15/00
$72.18
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
8422
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
5268
02/15/00
$111.65
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
8491
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
5280
< *>
$183.83*
r
02/15/00
$37.50.
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COUNCIL CHECK _ 1ISTER
18222500
09 -FEB -2000 (13: page 3
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207585 02/15/00
$60.00
BCA /Training & Developme.Cont. Ed.
T008512 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
02/15/00
$350.00
BCA /Training & Developme DARE - Cont. Ed.
T008534 DARE CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$410.00*
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
207586 02/15/00
207587 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
$10,497.12 BEARCOM Service Contract
$10,497.12*
$535.06 Becker Arena Products Clean Boards
$49.94 Becker Arena Products Bearing
$165.79 Becker Arena Products Repairs
$750.79*
1420646 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI 3096.
19041 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8033
00018974 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2007
00019150 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8026
207588
02/15/00
$37.50.
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
18222500
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$186.21
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
31322000
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$277.39
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
31322100
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$392.60
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
18265400
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$76.50
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
18265500
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$970.20*
207589
02/15/00
$29.39
BERNARD J.
MULCAHY CO IN
Gasket Set
20361
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
5377
< *>
$29.39*
207592
02/15/00
$20.65
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7189440
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3075
02/15/00
$110.04
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.-
Office Supplies
7190200
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3134
02/15/00
$9.38
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Labels for Property
7313850
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI.
02/15/00
$879.19
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
General Supplies
7315070
POLICE DEPT.'G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3118
02/15/00
$293.55
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
General Supplies
7320810
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3118
02/15/00
$34.56
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7321810
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
8017
02/15/00
$33.10
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Correction Tape
7327520
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5324
02/15/00
$95.68
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Garbage Bags
7332770
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
7520
02/15/00
- $10.29
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
CM730422
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLIE
02/15/00
$114.42
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Hiliters, Binders
7338170
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5336
02/15/00
- $41.82
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Credit
CM733817
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5336
02/15/00
$43.19
BERTELSON-BROS.
INC.
Pad Holder
7341010
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
6205
02/15/00
$20.92
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Binder
7343070
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5336
02/15/00
$331.00
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Remodeling
7346820
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
4624
02/15/00
$155.04
BERTELSON.BROS.
INC.
General Supplies
7346870
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3123
02/15/00
$96.40
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Computer Supplies
7348290
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
6415
02/15/00
$52.66
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7348710
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3723
02/15/00
$359.18
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Remodeling
7350040
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
4626
02/15/00
$226.51
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7350500
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$6.60
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7350500
PWKS ADMIN GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$25.03
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Custom Stamp
S005332
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5452
02/15/00
- $733.25
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
General Supplies
CM731507
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3118
02/15/00
$20.91
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Binder
7338170-
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5336
02/15/00
$3.26
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
7362311
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
-$6.59
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
Office Supplies
CM735050
PWKS ADMIN GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$2,139.32*
207593
02/15/00
$326.42
Best Access
Systems of M
Core & Keys
MN -11225
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5335
< *>
$326.42*
207594
02/15/00
$167.98
BEST BUY
COMPANY INC.
Equipment- Rotary Gran
28105150
MEDIA LAB
EQUIP REPLACEM
9124
02/15/00
$93.82
BEST BUY
COMPANY INC.
GOGS
28105150
MEDIA LAB
COST. OF GD SOL
9124
02/15/00
- $21.26
BEST BUY
COMPANY INC.
Craft Supplies
28105032
MEDIA LAB
CRAFT SUPPLIES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207594
02/15/00
$95.28
BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
General Supplies
28105176
MEDIA LAB
GENERAL SUPPLI
9129
02/15/00
$159.98
BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
COGS
28105176
MEDIA LAB
COST OF GD SOL
9129
02/15/00
$63.89
BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
Telephone for CL
00504134
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMODITIES
4613
< *>
$559.69*
207595
02/15/00
$5,123.97
BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Refuse
1093657-
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
02/15/00
$37,935.20
BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Recycling
7000078-
RECYCLING
Recycling Char
< *>
$43,059.17*
207596
02/15/00
$11,224.29
Bolger Publication /Great
Printing
12484
PARK ADMIN.
PRINTING
02/15/00
$445.47
Bolger Publication /Great
PRINTING
12484
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
02/15/00
$593.96
Bolger Publication / Creat
PRINTING
12484
POOL ADMIN
PRINTING
02/15/00
$593.96
Bolger Publication / Creat
PRINTING
12484
ARENA ADMINIST
PRINTING
02/15/00
$890.94
Bolger Publication / Creat
PRINTING
12484
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
02/15/00
$1,781.88
Bolger Publication /Great
PRINTING
12484
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
02/15/00
$148.49
Bolger Publication /Great
PRINTING
12484
FRED RICHARDS
PRINTING
< *>
$15,678.99*
207597
02/15/00
$95.00
Boss Pumping
Septic Pumping
1595
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
5211
< *>
$95.00*
207598
02/15/00
$45.45
BOYER TRUCKS
Protective Cover
107572
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5271
< *>
$45.45*
207599
02/15/00
$20.00
Brauer, Julie
Refund - Safety Camp
020300
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$20.00*
207600
02/15/00
$510.54
Bremer, Lois
Ambulance Overpayment
012600
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$510.54*
207601
02/15/00
$106.50
BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS
Door Repair
362790
YORK OCCUPANCY
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$106.50*
207602
02/15/00
$4,100.25
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
Traffic Signal Equipt
132033
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REPAIR PARTS
5460
< *>
$4,100.25*
207603
02/15/00
$480.37
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
Class II Rock
305383,3
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIALS
1762
< *>
$480.37*
207604
02/15/00
$247:63
Call One Inc.
Equip Replace - Phone
354528
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3120
< *>
$247.63*
207605
02/15/00
$2,843.54
Cargill Inc.
Ice Control
20172850
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
5759
< *>
$2,843.54*
207606
02/15/00
$162.33
CATCO
Couplers, Fittings, H
3- 20904
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5267
02/15/00
$73.49
CATCO
Fittings
3 -21421
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5384
02/15/00
$2.78
CATCO
Fittings
3 -21571
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5388
02/15/00
$6.49
CATCO
Fittings
3 -21620
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5398
< *>
$245.09*
207607
02/15/00
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
Window Cleaning
151384
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
02/15/00
$25.56
City Wide Window Service.Window
Cleaning
151384
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
02/15/00
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
Window Cleaning
151384
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$56.98*
COUNCIL
T
CHECK . .ISTER
PRODUCTS
Wooden Handle
01121462
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
09 -FEB -2000 (13:-
, page 5
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207608
02/15/00
$855.00
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Hydrant Adapters
23164
FIRE
DEPT.
GEN GENERAL SUPPLI
3706
SAFETY
02/15/00
$302.00
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Fire Hose
23071A
FIRE
DEPT.
GEN GENERAL SUPPLI
3679
PRODUCTS
02/15/00
$46.15
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Grease - Elec. Switch
23211
FIRE
DEPT.
GEN GENERAL SUPPLI
3729
Rain Gear
02/15/00
$75.24
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Cylinder Maintenance
40326
FIRE
DEPT.
GEN EQUIP MAINT
Hard Hats, Safety Gla
< *>
GENERAL MAINT
$1,278.39*
EQUIPME
5372
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Broom Handles
01131905
207609
02/15/00
$103.75
CMI REFRIGERATION
Bar Repair
R83819
CLUB
HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPER
< *>
SUPPLI
$103.75*
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Gloves, Safety Shield
01134408
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY
207610
02/15/00
$820.05
Commercial Furniture
Bro_Remodeling
714442
CITY.
HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
EQUIPME
< *>
$820.05*
207611 02/15/00
02/15/00
207612 02/15/00
207613
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207614 02/15/00
207615 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
$67.27
$84.54
$151.81*
$547.50
$547.50*
$3.08
$77.30
$71.40
$97.91
$796.34
$182.12
$391.10
$48.68
$18.72
$17.58
$70.13
$1,774.36*
Commercial Pool & Spa Su D.E. 105736 -I POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2262
Commercial,Pool & Spa Su Chemicals, Chlorine, 0105829- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2271
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT Compressor Maint. Con 993019 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Wooden Handle
01121462
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
PRINTING
5161
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Cough Drops, BandAids
01122040
EQUIPMENT OPER
- SAFETY
EQUIPME
5325
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Wash Brush, Gloves
01126842
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5325
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Gloves, Safety Glasse
01128660
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5352
CONNEY
SAFETY.
PRODUCTS
Boots, Waders, Gloves
01130199
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5363
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Rain Gear
01130735
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5090
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Hard Hats, Safety Gla
01131334
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5372
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Broom Handles
01131905
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
COMMUNICATIONS
5326
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS '
Wash Brush Handle
01133258
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5325
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Gloves, Safety Shield
01134408
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5454
CONNEY
SAFETY
PRODUCTS
Gloves
01134772
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5454
$136.40
Construction
Bulletin
Ma Ad for Bid
CB86311
ADMINISTRATION .ADVERTISING LE
$136.40*
PRINTING
02/15/00
$17.89
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Plan Repro
0155278
INSPECTIONS
$828.00
CONTINENTAL
CLAY
CO
New Equipt- Capital
In 039417
ART
CNTR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP 9114
$90.71
CONTINENTAL
CLAY
CO
Craft Supplies
039417
ART
CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
$265.95
CONTINENTAL
CLAY
CO
Stoneware
039436
ART
SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL 9126
- $12.50
CONTINENTAL
CLAY
CO
Chbone
039437
ART
SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL 9126
$1,172.16*
Courier Service
126209
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$22.40*
207616
02/15/00
$21.99
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Plan Repro
0155113
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
02/15/00
$17.89
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Plan Repro
0155278
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
< *>
$39.88*
207617
02/15/00
$3,750.00
CORNERSTONE
Human Services - 4th
013100
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,750.00*
207618
02/15/00
$8.40
Corporate Express Delive
Courier Service
126209
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$14.00.
Corporate Express Delive
Courier Service
126209
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$22.40*
207619
02/15/00.
$204.00
Corporate Portrait Photo
About Town Photos
91100022
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
< *>
$204.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207620
02/15/00
$121.56
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL IN
Thermostat, Gaskets
100 -1429
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5385
02/15/00
$900.00
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL IN
School - Mechanics
001 -8237
TRAINING
PROF SERVICES
5063
< *>
$1,021.56*
207621
02/15/00
$623.54
Curtis 1000
Envelopes
30144701
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4581
02/15/00
$1,343.36
Curtis 1000
Envelopes
30159201
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4581
02/15/00
$302.27
Curtis 1000
Printing (Envelopes)
30244501
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
3113
< *>
$2,269.17*
207622
02/15/00
$72.32
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
108087
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6377
02/15/00
$62.94
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
108109
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6379
02/15/00
$61.76
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
108127
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6380
02/15/00
$178.66
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
108159
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6384
02/15/00
$29.60
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
108184
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6379
02/15/00
$122:62
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Repair Parts
10810900
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
6379
< *>
$527.90*
207623
02/15/00
$2,756.86
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Hydrant /Hose Equip.
314963
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3680
02/15/00
$811.33
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Rescue Litter & Stret
315942
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3680
02/15/00
$32.55
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Storz Mount
316263
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3714
02/15/00
$28.19
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Pelican Lamp
316726
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3666
< *>
$3,628.93*
207624
02/15/00
$829.00
DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS
Golf Bags
593269
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6208
< *>
$829.00*
207625
02/15/00
$1,015.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
84016
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$1,691.35
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
84183
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$18.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
84184
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$2,149.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
84185
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$2,600.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
84901
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$1,397.70
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
84903
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$18.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
84904
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$858.10
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
85116
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$18.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
85436
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$1,399.65
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
65437
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$11,167.40*
207626
02/15/00
$448.97
DELTA FOREMOST CHEMICAL
Grill Brite
674351
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
6405
< *>
$448.97*
207627
02/15/00
$46.25
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery
29195
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
6329
< *>
$46.25*
207628
02/15/00
$63.06
Department of Administat
I.D. Phone
W9912065
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$63.06*
207629
02/15/00
$10.00
Department of Labor & In
Tank Permit
020300
WATER TREATMEN
LIC & PERMITS
5300
02/15/00
$40.00
Department of Labor & In
Pool Boiler Exemptiio
237499
BUILDING MAINT
LIC & PERMITS
5212
< *>
$50.00*
207630
02/15/00
$3,565.81
DESQ
Office Furnitue
01 -2147
FIRE DEPT
EQUIP REPLACEM
4548
< *>
$3,565.81*
207631
_� a
02/15/00
,
$461.75
Disaster Management Syst
"START" Training
1112
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
3659
COUNCIL CHECK . SISTER 09 -FEB -2000 (13: page 7
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $461.75*
207632 02/15/00 $131.50 DON'S APPLIANCE & TELEVI Refigerator Repair 043893 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3755
< *> $131.50*
207633
02/15/00
6578262
02/15/00
207634
02/15/00
EHS Concert Band Booster
02/15/00
207635
02/15/00
PROF SERVICES
02/15/00
207637
02/15/00
012800
02/15/00
CONF & SCHOOLS
02/15/00
ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
02/15/00
207639
02/15/00
CONTR REPAIRS
02/15/00
207640
02/15/00
40126001
02/15/00
207641
02/15/00
ELVIN SAFETY
02/15/00
207642
02/15/00
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
207643
02/15/00
40259101
02/15/00
207638
02/15/00
6578262
02/15/00
SVC CONTR EQUI
02/15/00
EHS Concert Band Booster
02/15/00
020300
02/15/00
PROF SERVICES
02/15/00
ELASKY., JEFF
02/15/00
012800
02/15/00
CONF & SCHOOLS
02/15/00
ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
Motor Repair
207639
02/15/00
CONTR REPAIRS
5323
207640
02/15/00
40126001
DISTRIBUTION
207641
02/15/00
ELVIN SAFETY
Coveralls
207642
02/15/00
GENERAL SUPPLI
2274
207643
02/15/00
40259101
02/15/00
SAFETY EQUIPME
02/15/00
$3,886.36 DPC INDUSTRIES
$3,886.36*
$336.52
$336.52*
$104.22
$104.22*
- $137.00
$984.11
$702.73
$1,644.10
$170.10
- $78.00
$170.10
$285.35
$799.59
$886.80
$4,355.05
$1,218.54
- $21.49
$10,979.98*
$44.00
$2,609.20
$39.30
$1,422.10
$4,355.60
$2,174.95
$4,543.45
$5,381.95
$57.40
$20,627.95*
$121.09
$121.09*
$75.00
$75.00*
$24.98
$24.98*
$2,244.71
$2,244.71*
$119.20
$45.99
$201.01
E -Z Sharp Inc
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE -
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE —
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Water Chemicals
General Supply
Repair Parts
7000 -134 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 2320
3971 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8011
0433069 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6381
COST OF GOODS -SOLD WI 529328
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168984
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168989
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168996
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168997
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 529999
ACCESSORIES 171322
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172145
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172146
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172151
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172155
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172156
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 530612
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
COST OF GOODS
SOLD MI 577962
SOLD BE 580379
SOLD MI 580380
SOLD BE 580381
SOLD BE 580635
SOLD BE 583010
SOLD BE 583011
SOLD BE 583559
SOLD BE 583560
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING ACCESSORIES
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Pest Control
6578262
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
EHS Concert Band Booster
Ad for Park & Rec
020300
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
7071
ELASKY., JEFF
Continuing Education
012800
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
Motor Repair
265257
LIFT STATION M
CONTR REPAIRS
5323
ELVIN SAFETY
Reflective Gloves
40126001
DISTRIBUTION
SAFETY EQUIPME
5347
ELVIN SAFETY
Coveralls
40229201
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2274
ELVIN SAFETY
Reflective Gloves
40259101
DISTRIBUTION
SAFETY EQUIPME
5382
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$366.20*
207644
02/15/00
$38,604.76
EnComm
Midwest
Payment #3
021500
GENERAL(BILLIN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$38,604.76*
207645
02/15/00
$133.54
EULL'S
MANUFACTURING CO
Manhole Block, Pallet
20043
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI 5855
< *>
$133.54*
207646
02/15/00
$2,848.00
Expert
T Billing
Jan. Billing
020400
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,848.00*
207647
02/15/00
$15,118.00
Familink
Funding
012000
COMM. RESOURCE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$15,118.00*
207648
02/15/00
$700.00
Family
& Children's Sery
Human Services
0126
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
02/15/00
$1,100.00
Family
& Children's Sery
Side by Side
012600
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,800.00*
207649
02/15/00
$10.62
FASULO,
WALTER
Videotape Reimburseme
020700
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$10.62*
207650
02/15/00
$60.00
FBINAA
Dues and Subscription
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$60.00*
207651
02/15/00
$232.78
Ferrellgas
General Supplies
049145
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI 9119
< *>
$232.78*
207652
02/15/00
$29.95
FINE GARDENING
Subscription Renewal
020300
PARK MAINTENAN
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$29.95*
207653
02/15/00
$115.20
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST_ OF GOODS SOLD MI
12353
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$115.20*
207655
02/15/00
$1,011.01
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3028933
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$44.56
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3029467.
PW BUILDING
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$490.97
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3029467
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$124.02
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniforms
3030968
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$136.27
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Purchased Clothing
3030969
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$158.19
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3030971
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$187.00
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3030971
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$21.89
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3030972
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$68.16
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3030997
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$23.27
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3031333
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$23.27
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3031334
ST LIGHTING OR
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$23.28
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3031334
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$140.71
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3031539
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$61.84
G & K
DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniform Purchases
3032464
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
< *>
$2,514.44*
207656
02/15/00
$185.26
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$28.47
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$54.00
G & K
SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$103.61
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$271.87
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
02/15/00
$586.11
G & K
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
COUNCIL
CHECK — .jISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:
page 9
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207656
02/15/00
$156.49
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
013100
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
02/15/00
$195.60
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
013100
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
< *>
$1,581.41*
207657
02/15/00
$27.95
GARDEN DESIGN
Subscription Renewal
020300.
PARK MAINTENAN
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$27.95*
207658
02/15/00
.$504.17
GARLANDS INC..
Hand Trucks (2- Wheele
00203725
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
7522
< *>
$504.17*
207659
02/15/00
$200.00
GENERAL BINDING
Bal. Due on Laminator
564599BA
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
6417
*>
$200.00*
207660
02/15/00
$837.13
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS
Furniture for Arneson
156756
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
7064
< *>
$837.13*
207661
02/15/00
$133.13
George Byron Griffiths S
Council Members' Phot
144
CITY COUNCIL
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$133.13*
207662
02/15/00
$360.30
Gopher Sport
Hockey Sticks & Puck
6387431
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$360.30*
207663
02/15/00
$197.03
Graffiti Control
Service
Vandalism Repairs
726
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
5223
< *>
$197.03*
207664
02/15/00
$36.95
GRAFIX SHOPPE
Lettering for Police
9400
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5277
< *>
$36.95*
207665
02/15/00
$197.70
GRAINGER
Pick Handles, Sledge
495 -9214
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
5186
02/15/00
$93.90
GRAINGER
Pliers, Eyewear, Glov
498 -9808
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2267
02/15/00
$146.12
GRAINGER
Indoor Timer
495 -2111
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5353
02/15/00
$88.43
GRAINGER
Cable Tie, Screwdrive
495 -2864
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
5361
02/15/00
$113.19
GRAINGER
Paint, Whisk Brooms
495 -4215
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5371
< *>
$639.34*
207666
02/15/00
$353.00
Grand Pere Wines
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
00006734
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$942.00
Grand Pere Wines
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
00006743
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$60.00
Grand Pere Wines
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
00006746
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$1,355.00*
207667
02/15/00
$475.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
29154
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$220.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
29155
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$170.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
29156
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$647.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
29296
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1,512.00*
207668
02/15/00
$138.58
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
Telephone Jack
500 -5212
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5332
02/15/0,0
- $98.79
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
Credit Memo
500 -5212
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5168
< *>
$39.79*
207669
02/15/00
$225.00
GREER, PAT
Art Programs for Febr
020300
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$225.00*
207671
02/15/00
-$9.14
GRIGGS COOPER &
CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
529172
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
- $52.64
GRIGGS COOPER &
CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
529173
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207671
02/15/00
-$6.37
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
529288
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
- $21.34
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
529615
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
- $67.65
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
529616
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$3,117.40
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
168981
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$24.50
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
168982
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$26.04
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
168987
50TH.ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$1,262.02
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
168988
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$4,210.28
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
168994
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$6,735.90
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
169793
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
- $43.55
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
530005
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
- $72.05
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
530021
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
- $97.10
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
530022
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$1,318.11
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
171321
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$92.50
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
171323
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$771.90
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
171324
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$75.50
GRIGGS
COOPER'&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
172148
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$2,330.10
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
172149
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$308.60
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
172153
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$51.00
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
172153
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$155.04
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
172157
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$2,272.74
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
172158
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/15/00
$90.15
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
172159
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$22,471.94*
207672
02/15/00
$69.24
Griggs
Cooper &
Company
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
3773
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$69.24*
207673
02/15/00
$236.97
Groth Music
Sousa Band Sheet Musi
013100
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
7044
< *>
$236.97*
207674
02/15/00
- $84.99
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Paid
on
Inv.
29384
ERROR.
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
02/15/00
- $84.99
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Paid
on
Inv.
29578
ERROR
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
02/15/00
- $737.41
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Paid
on
Inv.
29938
ERROR
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
02/15/00
$737.41
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Grease
(Bulk)
32061
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
1760
02/15/00
$737.41
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Retinax
LC Grease
29938
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
1760
< *>
$567.43*
207675
02/15/00
$35.09
Hamco Data Products
Case
of
Rolls
/Cash
Re
200587
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$35.09*
207676
02/15/00
$695.98
HARMON
AUTOGLASS
Windshield & Adhesive
0014 -000
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5272
02/15/00
$602.26
HARMON
AUTOGLASS
Windshield
0014 -000
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5278
< *>
$1,298.24*
207677
02/15/00
$7,213.88
Hartland Fuel Products
L
Gas
- Diesel
333724
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
1217
< *>
$7,213.88*
207678
02/15/00
$103.84
Health
& Happiness
Special
Meeting
020100
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$103.84*
207679
02/15/00
$495.00
Hedeler & Koch
Inc.
Continuing Education
020300
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$495.00*
207680
02/15/00
$134.10
HEIMARK FOODS
Meat
014139
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
6335
< *>
$134.10*
COUNCIL
CHECK .__SISTER
09
-FEB -2000 (13:4_, page 11
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------
207681
02/15/00
$50.85
Hennepin County
Sheriff'
Per Diem Fee - Prison
013100
LEGAL SERVICES
COURT CHARGES
< *>
$50.85*
207682
02/15/00
$1,970.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASURE
Printing (2000 Citati
2000 -01-
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
< *>
$1,970.00*
207683
02/15/00
$3,775.41
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASURE
Room & Board
002551
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
< *>
$3,775.41*
207684
02/15/00
$150.00
Hewitt, Sandra K.
Professional Services
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$150.00*
207685
02/15/00
$235.37
HOIGAARD'S CUSTOM CANVAS
Fit -Test Hood
10990
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3658
< *>
$235.37*
207686
02/15/00
$150.00
Holden, Richard
A.
Continuing Education
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$150.00*
207687
02/15/00
$58.52
Home.Enviromen_t
Center
Water Filtration
2644
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
4622
207688
02/15/00
$63.90
Home'Juice
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
50202
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$63.90*
207689
02/15/00
$85.60
HONEYWELL INC
Ignition Control
625HB403
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2013
< *>
$85.60*
207690
02/15/00
$67.10
HOOTENS
Laundry
120799
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
< *>
$67.10*
207691
02/15/00
$259.23
KNOX COMMERCIAL
CREDIT
Repair
0217 -413
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR,REPAIRS
8025
02/15/00
$24.26
KNOX COMMERCIAL
CREDIT
Serrated Knife, Organ
0217- 414.BUILDING
MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5214
02/15/00
$77.02
KNOX COMMERCIAL
CREDIT
Repair Parts
0217 -414
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
6388
02/15/00
$54.34
KNOX COMMERCIAL
CREDIT
Tree Spray, Dowel, Ha
0217 -414
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5380
< *>
$414.85*
207692
02/15/00
$59.10
HUEBSCH
Towels, Linens
953843
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
< *>
$59.10*
207693
02/15/00
$1,513.47
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water Meters
0016007-
UTILITY PROG.
INVENTORY WATE
3671
02/15/00
$1,069.26
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water Meters
0016009-
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3671
02/15/00
$2,002.20
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water Meters
0016011-
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3671
02/15/00
$2,035.13
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Watr Meters
0016012-
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3671
02/15/00
$1,546.38
HYDRO,SUPPLY CO
Water Meters
0016013-
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3671
< *>
$8,166.44*
207694
02/15/00
$1,607.73
IBM Corporation
Service Contract -Inv.
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$1,607.73*
207695
02/15/00
$246.51
IBM Corporation
Service Contract -Inv.
02 -04
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$246.51*
207696
02/15/00
$285.83,
Office Solutions
Fax Maintenance
23549408
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$285.83.*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207697
02/15/00
$200.00
INDEPENDENT'SCHOOL DIST
Ad
1796
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$200.00*
207698
02/15/00
$263.33
Information Hotline
Hotel Guide Ad
020100
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
02/15/00
$263.34
Information Hotline
Hotel Guide Ad
020100
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
02/15/00
$263.33
Information Hotline
Hotel Guide Ad
020100
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$790.00*
207699
02/15/00
$1,750.00
Inspectron Inc.
Contract Roof Inspect
012100
INSPECTIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,750.00*
207700
02/15/00
$602.00
INTERLACHEN TRAVEL
Airfare
012700
PRO SHOP
MEETING EXPENS
6408
< *>
$602.00*
207701
02/15/00
$124.77
Interlight
Repair Parts
4731790-
MEDIA LAB
REPAIR PARTS
9296
< *>
$124.77*
207702
02/15/00
$69.22
IOS Capital
Equipment Rental
46332555
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
9296
< *>
$69.22*
207703
02/15/00
$135.01
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
Lamps, Conduit
4157225-
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5343
02/15/00
$215.37
J.H. LARSON COMPANY -
Switches, Starter
4157658-
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
5359
02/15/00
$87.95
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
Flood Lights
4157838-
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5366
< *>
$438.33*
207704
02/15/00
$1,582.50
Jensen Swanson & Sondral
Water Tower Lease
013100
LEGAL SERVICES
PRO SVC - LEGA
< *>
$1,582.50*
207705
02/15/00
$76.66
Jenson, Thomas_
Nov & Dec 99 Allowanc
012500
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$76.66*
207707
02/15/00
$171.13
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$17.90
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$61.84
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$21.61
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$20.11
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$114.29
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$4.98
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$2.29
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
— 02/15/00
$3.96
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$132.36
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$476.55
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$585.32
JERRY'S HARDWARE
Snowblower
013100
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
02/15/00
$137.63
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$42.61
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$27.57'
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$42.80
JERRY'S HARDWARE.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/:00
$196.49
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$18.63
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$1.10
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013100
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL'SUPPLI
< *>
$2,079.17*
207708
02/15/00
$258.50
JERRY'S PRINTING
Registration Forms
A -13215
PARK ADMIN._
PRINTING
< *>
$258.50*
COUNCIL
CHECK .__SISTER
$53.25
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
OF GOLD Stat Guard
09 -FEB -20.00 (13:4.
page 13
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM.
OBJECT
PO NUM
----------------------------------------------
207709
02/15/00
$56.66
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER
Weather Stripping
I6540
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3756
< *>
$23.25
$56.66*
One Game Refund
013100
EDINA "ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
207710
02/15/00
$279.56
JIM HATCH SALES
Shovels, Floor Brush
1053
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
5479
JULIEN, DIANE.
02/15/00
$120.04
JIM HATCH SALES
Shovels
1055
SKATING RINK M
TOOLS
5383
< *>
$399.60*
207711
02/15/00
$473.93
Jim Lupient's Harold Che
Absorbers
46471CVW
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5285
< *>
$473.93*
207712
02/15/00
$100.00
Jobe, Charles
Uniform Reimbursement
013100 -
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
< *>
$100.00*
207715 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
- $281.07
- $33.79
-$5.51
-$2.47
$2,878.37
$893.80
$56.19
$2,311.17
$252.45
$648.60
$1,153.67
$21.77
$4,484.42
$95.95
$2,509.80
-$5.91
- $15.14
$411.10
$109.75
$109.75
$5,102.80
$3,103.39
$172.90
$271.41
$118.70
$1,360.66
$2,946.03
$7.26
$2,457.77
$993.99
$32,127.81*
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 111562
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 111762
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 112338
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 112462
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1074169
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1074170
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074171
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1074172
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074173
COST -OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074174
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074175
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1074176
COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 1074177
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1074178
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074179
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 112673
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 112674.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1074886
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1075575
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1075642
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1076674
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1076675
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076676
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076677
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076679
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076680
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076681
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1076682
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1076683
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1077431
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST.OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
.50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF.GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
207716
02/15/00
$53.25
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
OF GOLD Stat Guard
162259
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS 5376
02/15/00
$23.00
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
OF GOLD Motor (Electric)
162327
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS 5450
< *>
$76.25*
207717
02/15/00
$23.25
Jones, Brennan
One Game Refund
013100
EDINA "ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$23.25*
207718
02/15/00
$5.00
JULIEN, DIANE.
$5.00 Short on Licens
020200
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$5.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
CO
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207719
02/15/00
$24.45
JULKOWSKI, JAMES
Hooks & Blinds for St
020700
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
02/15/00
< *>
02/15/00
$24.45*
02/15/00
MI
02/15/00
50TH
02/15/00
CST
02/15/00
GDS
207720
02/15/00
$233.30
JUSTUS
LUMBER
Lumber
41444
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5331
YORK
02/15/00
$104.79
JUSTUS
LUMBER
Brass, Lumber
42238
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5356
OF
02/15/00
$17.46
JUSTUS
LUMBER
Glue
42417
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5364
$34.00
02/15/00
$38.77
JUSTUS
LUMBER
Lumber
42563
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
259997
5215
ST SELLIN
02/15/00
$133.83
JUSTUS
LUMBER
Lumber, Square, Glue
42856
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5448
< *>
SOLD
$528.15*
259998
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
207721
02/15/00
$26.78
Justus
Rental Center
Brads
94949
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5364.
< *>
$26.78*
207722
02/15/00
DISTRIBUTING
CO
207723
02/15/00
< *>
SOLD
207724
02/15/00
50TH
ST SELLIN
207725
02/15/00
GDS
BEE
207727
02/15/00
DISTRIBUTING
02/15/00
COST
02/15/00
GOODS
02/15/00
MI
02/15/00
50TH
02/15/00
CST
02/15/00
GDS
02/15/00
$28.90
02/15/00
DISTRIBUTING
02/15/00
COST
02/15/00
GOODS
02/15/00
MI
02/15/00
YORK
02/15/00
CST
02/15/00
GDS
MIX
207728
02/15/00
DISTRIBUTING
CO
207729 02/15/00
02/15/00
207730 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
$222.06
$222.06*
$184.39
$184.39*
$150.00
$150.00*
$69.00
$69.00*
- $28.40
$250.80
$482.80
$591.20
$1,801.95
$628.85
$739.00
$812.57
$1,104.95
$70.40
$63.00
$170.98
$2,481.55
$27.95
$36.00
$9,233.60*
$108.00
$108.00*
$36.57
$502.50
$539.07*
KAR PRODUCTS
Kath Fuel Oil Service
KDIZ Radio Disney
Kielas, Kelly.K.
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi.Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai.Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Koala Corporation
KONTERS, VIK
KONTERS, VIK
Supplies 768500 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6387
Fuel Oil I11651 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 5286
Advertising 123 -0007 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER
Refund of Mgrs. Lic'F 020300 GENERAL FD PRO WINE LICENSE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM00118A 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 123507 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 123755 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 123779 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 123786 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 123789 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 124060. YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'124271 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 124276 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124277 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124279 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 124281 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 124283 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 124284 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124285 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
Liners for Diaper Sta 0134680- POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2263
Continuing Education 012700 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
Clothing Allowance Re 020400 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW
$462.85
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
259422
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
$50.45
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
259423
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
$28.90
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
259518
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
$1,858.80
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
259519
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
$34.00
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST,
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
259997
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
$317.30
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
259998
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK .._jISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:4"
page 15
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7----------------------
207730
02/15/00
$1,674.00
KUETHER
DISTRIBUTING
CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
260100
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
<*>
$4,426.30*
207731
02/15/00
$122.15
KULAK,
CAROLE
Reimbursement for Flo
020400
MAINT OF COURS
COURSE BEAUTIF
< *>
$122.15*
207732
02/15/00
$396.53
Lands'_
End Corporate
Sal
Uniform Shirts
01049831
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$591.03
Lands'
End Corporate
Sal
Uniform Shirts
01049831
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$653.94
Lands'
End Corporate
Sal
Uniform Shirts
01049831
LIQUOR'YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,641.50*
207733
02/15/00
$136.62
Lathrop
Paint Supply
Com
Paint
752456
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
5349
< *>
$136.62*
207734
02/15/00
$267.75
LAWSON
PRODUCTS INC.
Washers, Cabinet, Dra
1242151
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5338
02/15/00
$242.46
LAWSON
PRODUCTS INC.
Clamp, Hose, Screwdri
1242152
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
5339
< *>
$510.21*
-
207735
02/15/00
$16.26
LEEF BROS. INC.
Towels
174815
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$16.26*
207736
207737
207738
207739
207741
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
$63.79 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS General Supplies 27844B POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3088
$63.79*
$367.00 LUTZ, R. MICHAEL Clothing Allowance Re 020400 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW
$367.00*
$396.00 LYLE SIGNS INC. Signs 82077
$396.00*
$12.00 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION Subscripton 01/21
$12.00*
$1,375.15
$1,083.80
$62.25
$18.40
$2.,719.75
$36.80
$15.50
$242.05
$1,854.55
$22.95
$2,069.15
$18.00
$825.45
$1,665.16
$92.00
$76.80
$1,107.15
$535.43
$7.75
$3,581.15
$241.55
$17,650.79*
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK V I I . SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106944
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106945
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106946
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106947
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106968
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106969
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 10697?
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109056
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109203
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 109204
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109205
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 109206
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109358
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109365
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 109366
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 109367
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 111459
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 111630
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 111631
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 111633
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 111697
STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5184
LIQUOR 50TH ST DUES & SUBSCRI
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING "CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF,GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 16
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------.------------------
207742
02/15/00
$119.45
MATHISON CO, THE
Brushes, Paper
194.543 -0
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9138
< *>
$119.45*
207743
02/15/00
$483.40
Matrix Communications In
New Fire Alarm Line
0040354-
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$483.40*
207744
02/15/00
$265.00
MCFOA
Annual City Clerks Co
020700
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$265.00*
207745
02/15/00
$170.59
MCKENZIE, TOM
Uniform Allowance Rei
0204
POLICE DEPT. G_UNIF
ALLOW
02/15/00
$172.36
MCKENZIE, TOM
Continuing Education
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$342.95*
207746
02/15/00
$420.00
MECA
Registration 11th Ann
012700
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$420.00*
207747
02/15/00
$75.00
MedPro Midwest Group
Cot Fastener
545
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3754
< *>
$75.00*
207748
02/15/00
$107.42
Medzis, Andrew
Petty Cash
012500
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$107.42*
207749
02/15/00
$30.75
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
Cleaning Supplies
16202
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
7517
02/15/00
$45.97
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
Humidifier
18807
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2275
< *>
$76.72*
207750
02/15/00
$16.89
MENARDS_* ACCT #30240251
Paint Supplies
68863
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
6414
< *>
$16.89*
207751
02/15/00
$660.88
MERIT SUPPLY
MeriClean, Merisan, T
52800
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
2265
02/15/00
$10,193.12
MERIT SUPPLY
Replace Old Scrubber
52810
ICE ARENA PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
8022
02/15/00
$94.73
MERIT SUPPLY
Snow White, Mops, Uri
52837
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5209
02/15/00
$361.04
MERIT SUPPLY
Soap, LPS I,II,III
52838
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
5357
02/15/00
$235.98
MERIT SUPPLY
Cleaning Supplies
52844
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CLEANING SUPPL
3725
02/15/00
$254.22
MERIT SUPPLY
Warning Flags
52860
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
5378
02/15/00
$271.68
MERIT SUPPLY
Soap, Dispenser
52861
LIFT STATION M
GENERAL SUPPLI
5375
02/15/00
$828.57
MERIT SUPPLY
Cleaning Supplies
52866
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
8032
"
02/15/00
$299.21
MERIT SUPPLY-
Vacuum, Bags
52883
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
5220
02/15/00
$583.03
MERIT SUPPLY
Silicone Coating
52887
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
5418
02/15/00
$283.82
MERIT SUPPLY
Degreaser, Tissue
52888
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
2016
< *>
$14,066.28*
207752
02'/15/00
$15.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
Collection Fee
103106
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$15.00*
207753
02/15/00
$123.00
Metro Volley Ball Offici
Officiating Fees
1771
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$123.00*
207754
02/15/00
$35.00
MFAPC
Renewal - for Fire De
020700
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$35.00*
207755
02/15/00
$65.00
MGCSA
Registration - J. Nyl
020100
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$65.00*
207756
02/15/00
$43.67'
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
Cleaning Supplies
18288
ART CENTER BLD
CLEANING SUPPL
9146
COUNCIL
CHECK ..aGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:4-1 page 17
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION,
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207756
02/15/00
$459.60
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
Liners, Napkins, Soap
18306
CITY HALL GENE.PAPER
SUPPLIES
4618
< *>
$503.27*
207757
02/15/00
$73.00
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Juice
66471262
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
CONTRACT
02/15/00
$92.88
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62120030
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF .GDS MIX
02/15/00
$109.85
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62120089
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$172.72
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
65870129
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$72.00
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Juice
66476139
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
CONTRACT
02/15/00
$90.12
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62122127
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$118.92
MIDWEST COCA- COLA-BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
65127074
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$729.49 *'
207758
02/15/00
$1,211.00
MILLER & SCHROEDER INVES
Management Fee
012500
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$1,211.00*
207759
02/15/00
$647.00
Minnesota Bride Magazine
Advertising
7888
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
2012
< *>
$647.00*
207760
02/15/00
$39.96
MINNESOTA CROWN DIST CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
8001
50TH ST SELLIN'CST
OF GD WINE
< *>
$39.96*
207761
02/15/00
$35.00
MINNESOTA D.A.R.E. OFFIC
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
221
DARE
DUES & SUBSCRI
02/15/00
$100.00
MINNESOTA D.A.R.E. OFFIC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
221
DARE
CONF & SCHOOLS
02/15/00
$35.00
MINNESOTA D.A.R.E. OFFIC
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
222
DARE
DUES & SUBSCRI
02/15/00
$100.00
MINNESOTA D.A.R.E. OFFIC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
222
DARE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$270.00*
207762
02/15/00
$95.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Conference
012600
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOLS
4542
< *>
$95.00*
207763
02/15/00
$10.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Pesticide License - B
012600
PARK MAINTENAN
LIC & PERMITS
5213
< *>
$10.00 *.
207764
02/15/00
$55.26
Minnesota Department of
Bituminous Inspection
PA000034
ST MILL OVERLA
CIP
< *>
$55.26*
207765
02/15/00
$76.00
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
Monthly Elevator Sery
9048
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
< *>
$76.00*
207766
02/15/00
$360.00
MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATI
2000 Dues
012400
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
6409
< *>
$360.00*
207767
02/15/00
$425.72
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME
Curb Stop & Copper
0084236
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
5333
< *>
$425.72*
207768
02/15/00
$75.00
MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JO
Subscription Renewal
020521
ASSESSING
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$75.00*
207769
02/15/00
$175.00
MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
Continuing Ed
002038
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS-3103
02/15/00
$175.00
MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
Bloodborne Pathogen
002043
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
3719
< *>
$350.00*
207770
02/15/00
$4,625.60
MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE
St. Surcharge - Dec.
012500
GENERAL FD PRO
SURTAX
< *>
$4,625.60*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 18
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207771
02/15/00
$107.43
MINNESOTA WANNER
3 Gal. Poly Sprayer,
0043206-
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS.
5374
< *>
$107.43*
207772
02/15/00
$75.00
MN Jr. Hockey Program
Subscription
005762
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCRI
8023
02/15/00
$100.00
MN Jr. Hockey Program
Ad
012400
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$175.00*
207773
02/15/00
$157.35
Momentum Golf Inc.
Club
16232
GOLF DOME
COST OF GD SOL
02/15/00
$57.45
Momentum Golf Inc.
Club
16307
GOLF DOME
COST OF GD SOL
< *>
$214.80*
207774
02/15/00
$67.45
MOORE MEDICAL
Rescue Response Bag
91317839
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5345
02/15/00
$46.85
MOORE MEDICAL
First Aid Supplies
91323519
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5368
< *>
$114.30*
207775
02/15/00
$740.00
MPCA
Waste Water Operator
020200
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$740.00*
207776
02/15/00
$110.00
MRPA
State Volleyball Tour
020700
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$110.00*
207777
02/15/00
$79.59
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Ignition Coil
ORDER NO
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2009
< *>
$79.59*
207778
02/15/00
$20.00
MUNICI -PALS
Minici -Pals Membershi.013100
CONTINGENCIES
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$20.00*
207779
02/15/00
$238.47
MUNICILITE CO
Magnetic Strobe Head
112
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5269
02/15/00
$62.62
MUNICILITE CO
Amber Strobe Beam
117
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5275
< *>
$301.09*
207780
02/15/00
$138.75
MUZAK
Music Service
020100
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
< *>
$138.75*
207781
02/15/00
$429.87
Napa Auto Parts
REPAIR PARTS
013100
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$429.87*
207782
02/15/00
$195.05
National Camera Exchange
Camera Exchange
0113007K
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMODITIES
4600
< *>
$195.05*
207783
02/15/00
$85.70
National Camera Exchange
Craft Supplies
7073442
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
3428
< *>
$85.70*
207784
02/15/00
$663.67
New France Wine Cc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
1753
50TH ST SELLIN
CST..OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$737.00
New France Wine Co
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
1787
YORK SELLING.
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1,400.67*
207785
02/15/00
$39.48
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
50002406
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$70.08
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
50002409
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$153.00
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
77002719
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$262.56*
207786
02/15/00
$63.36
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Switches
266576
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5386
< *>
$63.36*
COUNCIL
CHECK. GISTER
09 -FEB 72000 (13: -_j page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207787
02/15/00
$4,129.54
Northern Escrow Inc. &
Payment #4
021500
W 48TH STORM
CIP
< *>
$4,129.54*
207788
02/15/00
$104.34
NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC
Ear Plugs
749282 -0
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3720
< *>
$104.34*
207789
02/15/00
$1,043.69
Northern Tool & Equipmen
Gear Winch
3277326
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
5283
< *>
$1,043.69*
207790
02/15/00
$74.00
Northern Traffic Supply
Street Sign Seminar
020100
TRAINING
CONF &SCHOOLS
< *>
$74.00*
207791
02/15/00
$472.38
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
Markers, Pencils, Cha
16918100
ART SUPPLY-GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9137
02/15/00
$100.34
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
Crayola, Academy, Pen
16924200
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9139
02/15/00
$54.90
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
Charcoal Soft
16937700
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9142
< *>
$627.62*
207792
02/15/00
$185.29
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
Tires
NW -60834
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
5132
02/15/00
$306.72
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
Tires
NW -60857
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
5395
< *>
$492.01*
207793
02/15/00
$35.00
NOTA
Subscriptions
020400
POLICE.DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$35.00*
207794
02/15/00
$428.00
NTOA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
5152
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
3099
02/15/00
$100.00
NTOA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
5152
POLICE DEPT. G
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$528.00*
207795
02/15/00
$80.49
Olsen Chain & Cable Cc I
Repair Parts
130274
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
6382
< *>
$80.49*
207796
02/15/00
$294.26
OLSON, TIM
Clothing Allowance Re
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$294.26*
207797
02/15/00
$315.00
Omni Productions
Repair Sound
7817
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
8031
< *>
$315.00*
207798
02/15/00
$51.80_
OUR DESIGNS INC
Reflective Numbers
832370
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3693
02/15/00
$1.05
OUR DESIGNS INC
Reflective Numbers
836367
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3693
< *>
$52.85*
207799
02/15/00
$593.61
PageNet
Equipment Rental
00036377
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$593.61*
207800
02/15/00
$875.92
PageNet
Pager Rental
00036215
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$875.92*
207801
02/15/00
$1,707.90
PARTS PLUS
Parts
012600
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$1,707.90*
207802
02/15/00
$180.42
PATRICK & COMPANY
ACO- General Supplies
446330
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
3036
< *>
$180.42*
207803
02/15/00
$158.80
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
27566329
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$139.65
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
34323909
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 20
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207803 02/15/00 $73.50 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 34323912 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
< *> $371.95*
207806 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207807 02/15/00
207808 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207809 02/15/00
207810 02/15/00
207811 02/15/00
02/15/00
- $83.44
- $25.72
- $52.76
- $25.44
$936.36
$64.38
$328.36
$651.03
$41.80
$1,764.07
$2,712, 74
$661.30
$1,012.14
$23.38
$249.38
-$7.74
-$6.12
- $25.69
$34.89
$156.00
$983.97
$42.00
$858.63
$1,784.25
$1,828.44
$2,192.62
$16,098.83*
$69.31
$69.31*
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
Ping
$1,146.36 Pinnacle Distributing
$726.96 Pinnacle Distributing
$475.32 Pinnacle Distributing
$363.48 Pinnacle Distributing
$157.19 Pinnacle Distributing
$21.12 Pinnacle Distributing
$978.60 Pinnacle Distributing
$587.16 Pinnacle Distributing
$391.44 Pinnacle Distributing
$4,847.63*
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST-OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
Golf Clubs
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD,MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
$804.08
PLANT & FLANGED
EQUIPMEN Valve
$804.08*
YORK SELLING
CST
$39.68
POMMER CO
Plaque
$39.68*
YORK SELLING
CST
$143.78
PORTER CABLE
Drill
$37.28
PORTER CABLE
Pads
$181.06*
GDS
MIX
3208447 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
3208818 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
3208819 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
3209161 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
574944 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
574945 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
574946 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
574947 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
574948 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
574949 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
574950 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
574951 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
574952 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
574953 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
575469 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
3209458 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
3209459 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
3209538 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
576924 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
576925 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
576926 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
576927 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
576928 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
576929 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
576930 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
576931 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
4259961
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 6307
27008
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27141
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27203
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27218
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27285
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27286
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27392
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27443
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
27484
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
0024145- PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5344
46780 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 4623
6957618 CENTENNIAL LAK TOOLS 2010
6957914 CENTENNIAL LAK TOOLS 2018
COUNCIL CHECK -GISTER 09 -FEB -2000 (13:, -j page 21
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207812 02/15/00 $370.36 Print Shop, The Newsletter 10194 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7068
< *> $370.36*
207814 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207815 02/15/00
207816 02/15/00
207817 02/15/00
207818 02/15/00
- $39.78
- $11.56
- $17.56
$271.65
$933.34
$535.62
$1,508.25
$1,109.49
$271.65
$1,047.60
$362.20
$440.15
$1,548.00
$7,959.05*
$4,385.58
$4,385.58*
$149.00
$149.00*
$198.48
$198.48*
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 529349
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 529350
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 529353
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168983
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168985
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168986
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168995
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 168998
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172147
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172150
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172152
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172154
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 172160
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E Water Treatment Plant 99022.09 GENERAL(BILLIN CONTR REPAIRS
PRYOR RESOURCES Class /Training 1633841' TRAINING PROF SERVICES 5355
Qualification Targets
$36.52 R & T Specialty
$36.52*
Ammunition 20000052 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 6121
DARE- General Supplies 256604 DARE GENERAL SUPPLI 3105
207819
02/15/00
$453.40
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
Cloth,
Blades, Bolts
00011950
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI 2261
< *>
$453.40*
207820
02/15/00
$3,612.00
RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING
Locker
Room
1 /11 /00
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS 5295
< *>
$3,612.00*
207821
02/15/00
$1,534.50
RECREATION SPORTS OFFICI
Adult Basketball Offi
012700
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,534.50*
207822
02/15/00
$777.67
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
02/15/00
$156.40
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$336.90
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
02/15/00
$329.80
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPME
02/15/00
$118.00
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$326.15
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Shoes
1239
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
02/15/00
$115.60
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Boots
1249
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$191.25
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Boots
1249
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$177.65
RED WING SHOES
Safety
Boots
1249
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI.
< *>
$2,529.-42*
207824
02/15/00
$1,296.57
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
02/15/00
$521.46
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
YORK FIRE STAT
HEAT
02/15/00_
$1,296.09
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT -
02/15/00
$7,767.83
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
PW BUILDING
HEAT
02/15/00
$3,926.48
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 22
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207824
02/15/00
$1,354.07
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
02/15/00
$37.28
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
POOL OPERATION
HEAT
02/15/00
$1,172.58
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
02/15/00
$354.03
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
02/15/00
$4,094.73
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
GOLF DOME
HEAT
02/15/00
$124.41
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
FRED RICHARDS
HEAT
02/15/00
$4,282.53
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
02/15/00
$3,058.88
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
POOL TRACK GRE
HEAT -
02/15/00
$939.68
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
CENTENNIAL LAK
HEAT
02/15/00
$889.48
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
02/15/00
$3,275.01
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
02/15/00
$110.47
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
02/15/00
$181.45
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
02/15/00
$296.29
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
012800
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
< *>
$34,979.32*
207825
02/15/00
$69.02
RINK SYSTEMS INC
Repair Rink Door
2432
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
8028
< *>
$69.02*
207826
02/15/00
$507.56
Risk Management Alternat
Jan. Collection Fee
037856
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$507.56*
207827
02/15/00
$49.50
Risk Management Alternat
Jan. Letters
55187701
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$49.50*
207828.
02/15/00
$124.61
ROCHESTER MIDLAND
Sanitation
00135045
GRILL
CONTR SERVICES
6341
< *>
$124.61*
207829
02/15/00
$919.76
Rock -N- Rescue /J.E. Weine
Life Vests
069471
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3715
< *>
$919.76*
207830
02/15/00
$584.78
Ron Kassa Construction I
Final Payment
021500-
SIDEWALK -MAPLE
CIP
< *>
$584.78*
207831
02/15/00
$287.95
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
Sump Pump Cleaning
10108794
MAINT OF LOURS
PROF SERVICES
6391
< *>
$287.95*
207832
02/15/00
$2,898.41
SA -AG INC
Metro Sand
6058
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
1763
< *>
$2,898.41*
207833
02/15/00
$201.13
SAFETY KLEEN
Solvent
00113396
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
5421
< *>
$201.13*
207834
02/15/00
$178.49
SCAN AIR FILTER
MS Links
67379
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLI
5181
02/15/00
$448.83
SCAN AIR FILTER
Master Seals
67380
PW BUILDING
.REPAIR PARTS
5180
< *>
$627.32*
207835
02/15/00
$539.75
SCHARBER & SONS
Bushings, Idlers, Nut
218927
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5458
02/15/00
$31.75
SCHARBER & SONS
Bushings
219803
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5158
02/15/00
$359.03
SCHARBER & SONS
Blower, Elect Start,
219828
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5256
02/15/00
$61.25
SCHARBER & SONS
Chute Guard
220350
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5270
< *>
$991.78*
207836
02/15/00
$40.90
SCHWARTZ, S.A.
Commendation Plaques
0204
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$29.75
SCHWARTZ, S.A.
Commendation Frames
020400
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECK — &GISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13: -..) page 23
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$70.65*
207837
02/15/00
$345.62
SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWA
Ladder, Clamp, Saw Ho
199184
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
5162
< *>
$345.62*
207838
02/15/00
$395.00
SIERRA DIGITAL INC.
Software
RC000000
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$395..00*
207839
02/15/00
$404.00
SMIEJA, GARY
Machine Brass Pistons
012800
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$404.00*
207840
02/15/00
$135.00
SMITH & WESSON CAMERAS
Photographic
2211
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIES
3095
< *>
$135.00*
207841
02/15/00
$16.68
Smith & Wesson
Ammunition Supplies
0192696
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
< *>
$16.68*
207842
02/15/00
$234.30
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM
Imprint Flags
801690.8R
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
5281
< *>
$234.30*
207843
02/15/00
$1,993.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
103355
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$1,299.20 .
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
103356
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$24.40
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
407106
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$1,018.60
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GC' SOLD BE
103554
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$5,293.90
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GO, SOLD BE
103556
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
- $234.55
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOOLS SOLD BE
407160
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$101.30
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
407161
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$9,496.00*
207844
02/15/00
$32.00
SOUTHWEST JOURNAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
012500
COMMUNICATIONS
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$32.00*
207845
02/15/00
$489.90
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
Door Hanger Tags
4837
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
5307
< *>
$489.90*
207846
02/15/00
$227.36
SPS
Gloves, Check Valve
3423499
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5360
< *>
$227.36*
207847
02/15/00
$55.43
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Washers, Nuts
SIB5016
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5260
02/15/00
$54.98
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Spring /Switch
S285392
CENTENNIAL LAX
REPAIR PARTS
2011
02/15/00
$331.82
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Repair Parts
SI85484
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2012
02/15/00
- $262.57
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Repair Parts - Credit
SIB5541
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$179.66*
-
207848
02/15/00
$5,395.00
STAR TRIBUNE
Want Ads
013100
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
< *>
$5,395.00*
207849
02/15/QO
$2,987.05
Stop Stick LTD
Equip Replace - Stop
9918
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3116
< *>
$2,987.05*
207850
02/15/00
$9.59.
STREICHERS
Equipment Maintenance.
145063.3
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3070
02/15/00
$89.46
STREICHERS
Map Light
148123.1
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5265
02/15/00
$90.00.
STREICHERS
Equipment Maintenance
148405.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3132
02/15/00
$94.20
STREICHERS
Equipment Maintenance
148416.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3131
02/15/00
$42.17
STREICHERS
Red Lens
148815.1
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3126
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 24
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207850
02/15/00
$67.50
STREICHERS
Equipment Maintenance
148922.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3133
02/15/00
$21.09
STREICHERS
Equipment Maintenance
148815.2
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3126
< *>
$414.01*
207851
02/15/00
$1,355.16
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Front -end Repair & Pa
CVCB3634
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5142
02/15/00
$914.49
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Repair & Parts - Carg
CVCB3640_
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5340
02/15/00
$7.59
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Weather Stripping
102179 -1
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5396
< *>
$2,277.24*
207852
02/15/00
$239.35
SUBURBAN PROPANE
LP Fuel
011700
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
8029
< *>
$239.35*
207853
02/15/00
$86.10
Sun Newspapers
Ad for Bids
290986
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
02/15/00
$77.00
Sun Newspapers
2000 Summary Budget
291567
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
02/15/00
$96.35
Sun Newspapers
Ad for Bid
293032
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
02/15/00
$77.90
Sun Newspapers
Ad for Bid
293033
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
02/15/00
$84.05
Sun Newspapers
Ad for Bid
293916
COMMUNICATION
ADVERTISING.LE
*>
$421.40*
207854
02/15/00
$413.63
Superior Coffee and Food
Coffee
8144384
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
6343
< *>
$413.63*
207855
02/15/00
$155.27
Swanson Plumbing & Heati
Permits Canceled
020300
GENERAL FD PRO
MECHAN PERMITS
< *>
$155.27*
207856
02/15/00
$440.45
T.C. MOULDING & SUPPLY
Mat Cutting Sys.
332369DI
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9108
< *>
$440.45*
207857
02/15/00
- $20.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
Beer
183743
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
6345
02/15/00
$3,218.95
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
183777
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$36.30
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
183778
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/15/00
$1,704.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
184351
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$4,939.25*
207858
02/15/00
$872.20
TILE SHOP, THE
Tile and Grout
00003788
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5344
02/15/00
$520.29
TILE SHOP, THE
Tile, Grout
00004509
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5451
02/15/00
$22.77
TILE SHOP, THE
Tile
00004509
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5451
< *>
$1,415.26*
207859
02/15/00
$434.50
Timewise
Calendar Board
250846
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
6397
02/15/00
$17.90
Timewise
Year Planner
260924
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
4607
< *>
$452.40*
207860
02/15/00
$16.50
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Tank Pick Up
295441
GENERAL MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5348
.
02/15/00
$16.50
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Pick Up Cylinders
295508
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5348
< *>
$33.00*
207861
02/15/00
$81.79
Tonka Building Supplies
Screens fpr Weber
20013
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
5246
< *>
$81.79*
207862
02/15/00
$99.00
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Contracted Repairs
8847
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
02/15/00
$633.68
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Replace Scanners
8942
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
02/15/00
$633.67
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Replace Scanners
8942
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$1,366.35*
COUNCIL
CHECK __2GISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:z
-) page 25
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207863
02/15/00
$141.11
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
DARE - General Suppli
0108208-
DARE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3106
< *>
$141.11*
207864
02/15/00
$340.00
TWIN CITY ROSE SOCIETY
80 Bags of Cocoa Mulc
012600
MAINT OF COURS
COURSE BEAUTIF
< *>
$340.00*
207865
02/15/00
$1,293.76
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO
Saws
A2850
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TOOLS
3672
< *>
$1,293:76*
—
207866
02/15/00
$434.00
U S BANCORP
Airfare to Fire Acade
012500
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$434.00 *.
207867
02/15/00
$25.90
U S BANCORP
Book - Barnes & Noble
020700
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PAMPHL
< *>
$25.90*
207868
02/15/00
$61.74
U S BANCORP
Meeting Expenses
020500
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$61.74*
207869
02/15/00
$100.00
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Presort Permit 00303
020300
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$100.00*
207870
02/15/00
$98.57.
United Electric
Tamperproof Screwdriv
51707900
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
5417
< *>
$98.57*
207871
02/15/00
$2,070.00
United Glass Inc.
Map Installation
19906
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
3656
< *>
$2,070.00*
207872
02/15/00
$193.25
UNITED STORES
Jeans, Socks
STMT. 12
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
5416
< *>
$193.25*
207873
02/15/00
$60.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Pesticide Workshop
012600
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF & SCHOOLS
5210
< *>
$,60.00*
207874
02/15/00
$167.31
Unlimited Supplies Inc
Push Lock, Push -In, T
00031771
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
5179
< *>
$167.31*
207875
02/15/00
$626.63
UPBEAT INC
Garbage Can Tops
00324931
LITTER REMOVAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
5192
< *>
$626.63*
207876
02/15/00
$218.20
US FOODSERVICES INC
Food
611661
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
2014
02/15/00
$178.50
US FOODSERVICES INC
Food
614728
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
2014
02/15/00
$261.65
US FOODSERVICES INC
Food for Resale
600449,6
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
6346
02/15/00
$155.13
US FOODSERVICES INC
Paper Products
600449,6
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPLI
6346
02/15/00
$127.25
US FOODSERVICES INC
Food
618711
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
2017
< *>
$940.73*
207877
02/15/00
$1,842.75
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
020100
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
$85.20
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
020100
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
02/15/00-
$59.72
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
020100
PUMP_ & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
$784.35
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
020100.
GENERAL STORM
TELEPHONE
02/15/00
$35.54
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
020100
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
< *>
$2,807.56*
207878
02/15/00
$587.13
VAN PAPER CO.
Plates, Cups, Towels,
301423
CITY HALL.GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
4604
02/15/00
$159.48
VAN PAPER CO.
Cleaning Supplies
301764
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
2008
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13:42) page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207878
02/15/00
$498.90
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
301867
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
7513
02/15/00
$61.24
VAN PAPER CO.
Trash Bags
302780
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
2008
02/15/00
$515.57
VAN PAPER CO.
Paper Bags
302991
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
7512
02/15/00
$358.48
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
302992
50TH ST SELLIN
PAPER SUPPLIES
7511
< *>
$2,180.80*
207879
02/15/00
$8,200.00
VEAP
Human Services
012600
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$8,200.00*
207880
02/15/00
$384.00
VELDE, DAVID
Winter Institute on T
020200
TOBACCO GRANT
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$384.00*
207881
02/15/00
$598.87
VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICE
Service on Outdoor Ca
1969
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5478
< *>
$598.87*
207882
02/15/00
$100.11
VINCENT METALS.
Brass Rod Length
11614468
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
5373
< *>
$100.11*
207883
02/15/00
$182.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
3767
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$182.00*
207884
02/15/00
$294.67
Voss Lighting
Lamps, Lighting
2058222-
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
5342
< *>
$294.67*
207885
02/15/00
$101._18
WACO SCAFFOLDING MINNEAP
Scaffolding Platform
543657
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
4.034
< *>
$101.18*
207886
02/15/00
$2,165.00
WALSER FORD
Co -Pay Warranty Repla
FOCS1005
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5137
02/15/00
$121.60
WALSER FORD
Lamp Assembly
80459FOW
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5274
02/15/00
$74.43
WALSER FORD
Shock Absorber
80643FOW
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5387
< *>
$2,361.03*
207887
02/15/00
$210.87
WearGuard
Uniform Pants
41954194
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
2003
< *>
$210.87*
207888
02/15/00
$761.53
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Weld Supply
29009
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
5466
02/15/00
$154.94
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Handle Repair
29157
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
5379
02/15/00
$204.89
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Drill Bits, Point Tap
29241
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
5462
< *>
$1,121.36*
207889
02/15/00
$46.47
Wilkinson, Jennifer
Mileage Reimbursement
020100
COMMUNICATIONS
MILEAGE
< *>
$46.47*
207890
02/15/00
$32.52
WILLIAMS STEEL
Spray Paint
891308 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
5122
02/15/00
$61.41
WILLIAMS STEEL
Spray Paint
894920 -0
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5367
< *>
$93.93*
207891
02/15/00
$308.02
WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO
Promo Gloves
2184685
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
6209
< *>
$308.02*
207892
02/15/00
$961.50
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
034321
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$57.00
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
034322
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/15/00
$699.60
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
034347
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$309.40
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
034349
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/15/00
$424.75
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
034434
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
r
COUNCIL CHECK -GISTER
09 -FEB -2000 (13. page 27
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT------
07297046
VENDOR---------
- - - - --
DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------
$160.18
INVOICE
PROGRAM
--- -
- - - --
OBJECT - _ - - -_PO -NUM
-------------------------
207892
02/15/00
- - - - --
- $19.33
- -
WINE
- - --
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD_WI
$1,228.38*
034476
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
- $104.00
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
034477
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
$59.00
02/15/00
$558.65
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
034642
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
02/15/00
$1,007.40
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
034643
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$2,085.10
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
034644
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$70.00
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
034645
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
02/15/00
$56.95
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
034679
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$6,107.02*
207893
02/15/00
$120.69
WINE
MERCHANTS
COST
OF4GOODS
SOLD
WI
25563
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$166.38
WINE
MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
25564
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$369.26
WINE
MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
25565
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$345.69
WINE
MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
25657
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/15/00
$360.96
WINE
MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
25742
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$1,362.98*
207894
02/15/00
$29.25
WOLD,
MIKE
MILEAGE
OR ALLOWANCE
012800
VERNON LIQUOR
MILEAGE
02/15/00
$15.42
WOLD,
MIKE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
012800
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/15/00
$5.33
WOLD,
MIKE
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
012800
VERNON LIQUOR
OFFICE
SUPPLIE
02/15/00
-$0.35
WOLD,
MIKE
CASH
OVER
AND
UNDER
012800
VERNON LIQUOR
CASH OVER AND
< *>
$49.65*
207895 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
02/1.5/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207896 02/15/00
02/15/00
02/15/00
207897 02/15/00
207898 02/15/00
207899 02/15/00
02/15/00
- $216.00
$131.31
$664.02
$259.00
$901.50
$1,279.00
$792.00
$3,810.83*
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89884
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89988
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89989
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90051
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90169
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90170
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90246
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING• CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
$745.00
Xerox Corporation
Monthly Base - Dec. 9
07297046
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3413
$160.18
Xerox Corporation
General Supplies
17137122
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3125
$323.20
Xerox-Corporation
Service Contract - Co
07317533
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
3125
$1,228.38*
$220.46
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
Brush
72625
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2019
$220.46*
$59.00
ZD Journals
AutoCad Training Maga
11319822
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
4628
$109.32
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
First Aid Medical. Sup
54064945
ARENA ADMINIST
SAFETY EQUIPME
8024
$93.88
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
Drug Supplies
54163068
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
4615
$203.20*
$561,788.15*
COUNCIL
CHECK SUMMARY
09 -FEB -2000 (13:46) page 1
------=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
GENERAL FUND
$182_,329.46
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATIONS
$630.19
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$12,900.82
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$5,284.15
FUND
#
25
GOLF DOME FUND
$5,046.12
FUND
#
26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$631.24
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$10,566.35
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$18,756.03
FUND
#
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$11,328.32
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$72,213.53
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
$784.35
FUND
#
42
RECYCLING PROGRAM
$37,935.20
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$198,608.98
FUND
#
60
CONSTRUCTION FUND
$4,773.41
$561,788.15*
COUNCIL CHECK R. STER
01 -FEB -2000 (11:3 - ..gage 1
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
206721
01/03/00
$626.40
CopyMax
Snow Plow Book
967639
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI 5080
< *>
$626.40*
206722
01/03/00
$40.00
Hospitality Minnesota
Continuing Education
122899
PARK ADMIN.
CONE & SCHOOLS
< *>
$40.00*
206723
01/03/00
$3,087.00
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
SAC for Nova 99
121599
GENERAL FD PRO
SAC CHARGES
< *>
$3,087.00 *.
206726
01/03/00
-$9.90
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
778566 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
- $157.10 -,QUALITY
WINE -
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
782203 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
$1,600.00
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
782922 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
- $16.00-
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
782922 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
- $18.51
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
789165 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
- $106.38
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
789199 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
$577.60
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
789304 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
-$5.76
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
789304 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$288.80
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
789306 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
-$2.88
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
789306 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$1,723.76
QUALITY
WINE
COST -OF GOODS SOLD
WI
789502 - 050TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
- $17.09
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
789502 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$2,186.79
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
789561 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
- $43.51
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
789561 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$3,527.36
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
789850 -0
-YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
- $70.16
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
789850 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00 -.
$3,524.30
QUALITY
WINE.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
790002 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
- $34.95
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
790002 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$3,719.89
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
790461 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
- $36.88
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
790461 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
$2,131.52.
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
790462 -0
VERNON SELLING,
CST OF GD LIQU -
01/03/00
- $42.41
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
790462 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/.00
$861.60
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
790828 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/03/00
-$8.52
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
790828 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT,
01/03/00
$1,926.07
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
790922 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/03/00
- $38.38
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
790922 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/03/00
- $111.00
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS-SOLD
WI
791720 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$21,348.26*
206727
01/03/00
$57.05
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
122299
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$57.05*
$25,158.71*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
01 -FEB -2000 (11:07) page 2
CHECK NO CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
203854
01/04/00
$59.50
Hidden Fence of Minneso
Invisible Fencing Rep
110199A
CONTINGENCIES
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$59.50*
203855
01/07/00
$305,000.00
CITY OF
EDINA
Payroll Transfer
10700
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
01/07/00
- $305,000..00
CITY OF
EDINA
Payroll Transfer
10700
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
203856
01/21/00
$350,000.00
CITY OF
EDINA
Payroll Transfer
12100
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
01/21/00
- $350,000.00
CITY OF
EDINA
Payroll Transfer
12100
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
206728
01 /10 /00
$100.00
JAYES, JIM
MAGIC 01/16/00
01/16/00
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
206730
01 /10 /00
$337.32
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
791155 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01 /10 /00
-$3.33
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791155 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01 /10 /00
- $143.84
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
791959 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01 /10 /00
$1,251.50
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.
792238 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01 /10 /00
- $12.38
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
79223.8 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01 /10 /00
$2,638.50
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
792271 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01 /10 /00
- $26.07.
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792271 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01 /10 /00
$728.97
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
792638 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01 /10 /00
-$7.22
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792638 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01 /10 /00
$1,015.00
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
792881 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01 /10 /00
- $20.16
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792881 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01 /10 /00
$2,172:.09
QUALITY
WINE
COST.OF GOODS SOLD LI
792884 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01 /10 /00
- $43.15
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792884 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
< *>
$7,887.23*
206731
01 /10 /00
$100.00
SAWYER,
CHERYL
STORYTELLER
01/04/00
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
206732
01 /10 /00
$100.00
SLEEPER,
DAVID
VENTRILOQUIST
01/06/00
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
206733
01 /10 /00
$100.00
Tougas,
Frank
MAGIC
01/09/00
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
206734
01 /10 /00
$2,568.19
U.S. WEST
COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
12/25/19
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
01 /10 /00
$54.18
U.S. WEST
COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
12/25/99
DARE
TELEPHONE
01 /10 /00
$334:27
U:S.' WEST
COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
12/28/19
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
< *>
$2,956.64*
206735
01 /10 /00
$100.00
WONDER
WEAVERS
THEATER
01/13/00
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
207127
01/19/00
$400,000.00
HRA /CITY
OF EDINA
HRA Advance
011300
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$400,000.00*
207128
01/19/00
$304.00
Kahn, Rachel
Ambulance Overpayment
011400
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES.
< *>
$304.00*
207129
01/19/00
$60.00
LEAGUE
OF MINNESOTA CIT
Web Development Confe
021000
COMMUNICATIONS
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$60.00*
01 -FEB -2000 (11:0'x,, page 3
COUNCIL
CHECK Rh-.STER
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -_
- -- OBJECT - - -- PO.NUM.
------------------------------------------------=-'-------------------------------------------------
207130
01/19/00
$111.66
MBC PRESENTATION
Alcohol Awareness Tra
011100
LIQUOR 50TH ST
CONF & SCHOOLS
01/19/00
$111.67
MBC PRESENTATION
Alcohol Awareness Tra
011100
LIQUOR YORK GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
01/19/00
$111.67
MBC PRESENTATION
Alcohol Awareness Tra
011100
VERNON LIQUOR
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$335.00*
207131
01/19/00
$30.00
MINNESOTA GFOA
GFOA - Paula_
011200
FINANCE
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$30.00 *.
207132
01/19/00
$19.62
PERA
Contribution to Defin
011100
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$19.62*
207133
01/19/00
$66,138.46
PERA
Contributions to PERA
01 /11
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$66,138.46*
207134
01/19/00
$260.00
POSTMASTER
Monthly Mailing of Ne
011000
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$260.00*
207136
01/19/00
$4,000.00
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
792261 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/19/00
- $80.00
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792261 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
- $59.30
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
792582 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/19/00
$5,717.76
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
792882 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/19/00
- $113..59
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
792882- O.YORK
SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$2,323.07
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
794415 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/19/00
- $23.05
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS .
794415 -0
.YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$1,562.27
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
794418 70
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/19/00
- $15.45
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
794418 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$1,552.10
QUALITY WINE
COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI
794690 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/19/00
- $15.35
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
794690 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$3,493.53
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
794960 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/19/00
- $69.44
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
794960 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$816.22
QUALITY WINE
COST OF.GOODS SOLD LI
794961 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01/19/00
- $16.23
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
794961 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
$3,742.92
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
794963 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/19/00
- $74.41
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
794963 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
207137
01/19/00
$342.5.0
Rice Lake, WI Police De
Out of County Warrant
011000
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE TO OTHR GO
< *>
$342.50*
207138
01/19/00
$360.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Munici -Pals
011200
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$360.00*
207142
01/25/00
$6,064.90
DELTA DENTAL
2/00 DENTAL PREM
012100
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$6,064.90*
207143
01/25/00
$40.00
Hospitality. Minnesota
SHOW
011800
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$40.00*
207144
01/25/00
$19.62
PERA
PPEND 01/18/00
012400
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$19.62*
207145
01/25/00
$62,542.96
PERA
CONTRIBUTION
01/24/00
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
<*>
$62,542.96*
207147
01/25/00
- $13.45
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
795589 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
01 -FEB -2000 (11:07) page 4
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207147
01/25/00
- $24.14
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
796771 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/25/00
$4,140.66
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
796829 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/25/00
- $82.30
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
796829 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$2,465.69
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
796905 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
- $24.43
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
1
796905 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$2,616.21
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
796906 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
- $25.85
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
796906 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$3,430.76
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
796907 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
- $34.03
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
796907 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$1,564.21
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
797130 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01/25/00
- $31.04
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
797130 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$3,217.77
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF.GOODS SOLD
LI
797131 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/25/00
- $63.89
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
797131 -.0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
< *>
$17,136.17*
207148
01/25/00
$55.69
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6122859012
010700
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$56..67
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129443320
01 -10 -00
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$35.76
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129438693
01 /10 /00
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$45.33
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129447662
01102000
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$55.71
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6128931850
012900
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$225.41
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129252233
011300
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$70.50
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129389924
01/16/00
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
01/25/00
$54.22
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
6129355702
011600
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
< *>
-
$599.29*
207149
01/25/00
$939.96
Welsh Companies Inc
RENT 02/01/00
02/01/20
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$939.96*
207543
01/31/00
$15.00
Brock White
Restoration Seminar -D
012700
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$15.00*
207544
01/31/00
$63.89
Buffie,
Jeff
Reimbursement for CAD
013100
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$63.89*
207545
01/31/00
$56,225.01
MEDICA.
Premiums for 2/2000 C
012500
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$56,225.01*
207547
01/31/00
- $45.97
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
795590 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
$98.00
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
795960 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/31/00
- $52.50
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF.GOODS SOLD
WI
797010 -0
YORK SELLING -CST
OF GD WINE
01/31/00
-$6.80
QUALITY
WINE
COST.OF GOODS SOLD
WI
797855 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
- $10.90
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
798171 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
- $23.88
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
798206 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/31/00
-$4.41
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
798214 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
01/31/60
$1,367.73
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
798976 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
- $13.55
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
798976 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$1,324.79
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
799048 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
- $13.13
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799048 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$2,459.68
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
799049 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
01/31/00
- $24.41
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799049 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$37.16
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
799154 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
01/31/00
-$0.36
QUALITY.WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799154 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$1,110.53
QUALITY
WINE
-COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
799250 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
01/31/00
- $22.03
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799250 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$2,912.64
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
799264 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
• OF
COUNCIL
CHECK RE_ -STER
01 -FEB -2000 (11:07) page 5
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM"
OBJECT. PO NUM.
-----------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207547
01/31/00
- $57.88
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799264 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/31/00
$1,889.82_
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI.799265 -0
VERNON SELLING.CST
OF GD LIQU
01/31/00
- $37.57
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
799265 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
< *>
$10,886.96*
207548
01/31/00
$567.49
TSYS Total Debt Managem
Supplies
08049224
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$567.49*
207549
- 01/31/00
$60.22
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
0119
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
01/31/00
$27.27
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
011900
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
01/31/00
$58.10
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
012200
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$145.59*
207550
01/31/00
$230.80
US West
Dex
ADVERTISING OTHER.
012500
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
01/31/00
$230.80
US West
Deis
ADVERTISING OTHER
012500
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
- < *>
$461.60*
.
207551
01/31/00
$26.13
US West
Dex
TELEPHONE
011900
FRED RICHARDS
TELEPHONE
< * >
$26.13*
207552
01/31/00
$230.80
US West
Dex
ADVERTISING OTHER
012500
YORK.SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$230..80*
-
$657,959.37*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
01 -FEB -2000 (11:07) page 6
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------------
207122
01/19/00
$57.00
G & K SERVICES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
123199
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
01/19/00
$370.62
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
01/19/00
$231.85
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
123199
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
01/19/00
$127.55
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
01/19/00
$309.53
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
01/19/00
$52.60
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
01/19/00
$668.15
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
01/19/00
$300.39
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
123199
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
< *>
$2,117.69*
207125
01/19/00
$32,426.45
NSP
LIGHT &.POWER
01/24/00
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$39.95
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$4,659.20
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$4,061.95
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
PARKINGRAMP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$761.70
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$116.59
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
YORK FIRE STAT
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$52.76
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$1,859.45
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$3,674.66
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
PW BUILDING
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$6,945.29•
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$3,253.47
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$263.42
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$283.01
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
FRED RICHARDS
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$1,236.96
NSP
LIGHT &POWER
01/24/00
GOLF DOME
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$376.99
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$13,292.67
NSP
LIGHT.&
POWER
01/24/00
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$1,880.75
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$2,731.02
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$17,589.54
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$54.51
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
TANKS.TOWERS &
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$747.42
NSP
LIGHT-&
POWER
01/24/00
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$1,331.74
NSP.
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$670.24
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$134.23
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$216.00
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT &
POWER
01/19/00
$207.45
NSP
LIGHT &
POWER
01/24/00
AQUATIC WEEDS
LIGHT.&
POWER
< *>
$98,8,67.42*
207126
01/19/00
$843.30
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
791151 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
01/19/00
-$8.31
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791151 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/19/00
- $59.30
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
793464 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
01/19/00
- $60.80
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
793545 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
< *>
$714.89*
207139
01/25/00
$12.49
AT &T
BUSINESS LONG DISTANC
123199
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$12.49*
207140
01/25/00
$11,583.00
DNR Waters
WATER APPROPRIATION
01 -19 -20
DISTRIBUTION
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$11,583.00*
207141
01/25/00
$843.30
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
791152 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD.WINE
01/25/00
-$8.31
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791152 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$872.60
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
791153 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
01/25/00
-$8.65
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791153 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$674.64
QUALITY WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
791154 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
+ 0
-"OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
1
01 -FEB -2000 (11:07) page 7'
HECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT. PO NUM.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
207141
01/25/00
-$6.65
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791154 -0
VERNON
SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$337.32
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 791156 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
-$3.33
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791156 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00-
$355.84
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 791157 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
-$3.46
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791157 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
01/25/00
$355.80
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 791158 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
01/25/00
-$3.51
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
791158 -0
50TH
ST
SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
< *>
$3,405.59*
$116,701.08*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS
FUND #
10
GENERAL FUND
$655,625.04
FUND #
12
COMMUNICATIONS
$60.00
FUND #
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$264.45
FUND #
23
ART CENTER
$567.49
FUND #
25
GOLF DOME FUND
$1,236.96
FUND #
26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$376.99
FUND #
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$3,936.53
FUND #
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$13,927.33
FUND #
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAKES
$2,436.46
FUND #
40
UTILITY FUND
$32,200.77
FUND #
41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
$350.23.
FUND #
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$88,836.91
$799,819.16
ow - - - -0
01 —FEB -2000 PAGE 1.
Memo
To: Mayor Maetzold and the City Council
From:. John Keprios, Director of Parks and Re tion
Date: February 11, 2000
Re: Park Board Recommendation
At the February Park Board meeting, the proposed referendum project was presented by
staff. Pete Sieger, Architect from TSP One, gave the Park Board a brief presentation of
the pre- design study and the proposed recreational facility improvements on School
District property.
After lengthy discussion, the Park Board unanimously passed the following
recommendation:
"The Park Board recommends to the City Council to pursue a referendum to make
recreational facility improvements on School District property that includes all of the
staff's proposed projects plus the auditorium improvements and tennis court concrete
bang board at the Community Center tennis court site contingent upon successful resolve
to cover anticipated operating expenses for the Field House. The Park Board also
recommends renovation of the indoor pools at the middle schools and, if found to be
fiscally prudent based on the consultant's findings, the construction of a new indoor,25
yard by 25 meter competition pool with'separate diving well at the Valley View Middle
School site. The Park Board further recommends that the $4,500,000 worth of
recreational facility improvements on City property as proposed by staff be included in
the referendum."
After lengthy debate, this motion was made with the intent to develop a 3 -gym field
house facility, as opposed to a 4 -gym facility, with a fourth gym at Concord Elementary.
The 3 -gym facility is to include wood floors on all three gyms and include an elevated
running track. The motion also supports the synthetic surface for Kuhlman
football /soccer field. I also expressed to the Park Board that the referendum would also
,xjh of
Edina
Memo
To: Mayor Maetzold and the City Council
From:. John Keprios, Director of Parks and Re tion
Date: February 11, 2000
Re: Park Board Recommendation
At the February Park Board meeting, the proposed referendum project was presented by
staff. Pete Sieger, Architect from TSP One, gave the Park Board a brief presentation of
the pre- design study and the proposed recreational facility improvements on School
District property.
After lengthy discussion, the Park Board unanimously passed the following
recommendation:
"The Park Board recommends to the City Council to pursue a referendum to make
recreational facility improvements on School District property that includes all of the
staff's proposed projects plus the auditorium improvements and tennis court concrete
bang board at the Community Center tennis court site contingent upon successful resolve
to cover anticipated operating expenses for the Field House. The Park Board also
recommends renovation of the indoor pools at the middle schools and, if found to be
fiscally prudent based on the consultant's findings, the construction of a new indoor,25
yard by 25 meter competition pool with'separate diving well at the Valley View Middle
School site. The Park Board further recommends that the $4,500,000 worth of
recreational facility improvements on City property as proposed by staff be included in
the referendum."
After lengthy debate, this motion was made with the intent to develop a 3 -gym field
house facility, as opposed to a 4 -gym facility, with a fourth gym at Concord Elementary.
The 3 -gym facility is to include wood floors on all three gyms and include an elevated
running track. The motion also supports the synthetic surface for Kuhlman
football /soccer field. I also expressed to the Park Board that the referendum would also
a
Have to be contingent upon creation of a mutual agreement in writing between city and
school that details issues of access, maintenance' operating expenses, management and
ownership. However; I suggested that those details should be left to staff to propose to
iron out and get approval from the School Board and City Council.
The current strategy to cover field house operating expenses includes the interest and
principle from an endowment fund created by private donations. Attached is a letter from
Chuck Mooty, Park Board member, who is proposing this initiative in efforts to keep
youth and adult basketball programs affordable and accessible to Edina residents.
Please know that the preliminary estimates for pool renovation and pool replacement is
simply my best guess and not to be considered a reliable estimate. The consulting
architect suggests that my suggested pool figures "are in the ballpark, however, the final
figures are not yet determined."
There was also lengthy discussion regarding the inclusion of the proposed elevated track
for the 3 -gym field house. It was ultimately agreed that an elevated indoor track would
allow for multiple uses (track users not interfering with basketball court users) and would
fulfil a desire of the community for a lengthy indoor track with access to locker room
facilities. According to the consultant's estimates, costs to add an upper level track in the
3 -gym field house would be an additional $1,236,900.
There was a suggestion that came late in the discussion to consider placement of an air -
supported seasonal dome over the Kuhlman football /soccer field that had previously not
been considered. I share this information in this memo because a dome could do the
following:
• Eliminate the need for an elevated track in the field house because the newly
renovated 8 -lane track might be able to be used during the winter months.
• May cost considerably less than what it would to construct the elevated track.
• Would generate enough revenue to cover all operating expenses for its own operation
plus all field house operating expenses and possibly more.
• Would serve an existing need/desire expressed by the largest sports program in Edina,
soccer with over 3,000 participants.
This ,idea would need to be further studied with regards to parking, site feasibility,
neighborhood support, etc. The positive cash flow from such ,a facility may be significant
enough to deserve some consideration.
Detailed summary sheets of all Park Board's recommended projects are attached to this
memo.
PROJECT COST
Three -gym field house with elevated track and wood floors $ 4,861,337
Concord Elementary gym addition
$
1,522,800
South View Middle School gym
$
244,400
Community Center large gym
$
23,500
Community Center small gym
$
192,700
Community Center gym lobby /concessions stand
$
164,500
Community Center locker rooms
$
550,785
Community Center auditorium improvements
$
974,000
Tennis court bang board (conrete wall)
$
6,000
Lower /east campus field improvements
$
230,300
South parking relocation and expansion
$
235,000
North parking expansion
$
108,100
New pedestrian access pathway
$
4,700
Site restoration /landscaping
$
94,000
Kuhlman Stadium improvements (see page 18)
$
3,212,920
Widen track to 8 lanes
$
_ 145,700
Imrpove drainage (perimeter curb and drain tile)
$
70,500
Resilient turf football /soccer field surface
$
611,000
Improve and upgrade lighting
$
84,600
New tennis court lighting (4 courts)
$
32,900
High School baseball field
$
353,440
High School softball fields (2)
$
607,240
High School soccer fields (2)
$
268,840
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
$
14,599,262
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (includes all soft costs)
$
19,417,018
*New Valley View Pool
$
3,000,000
*Renovation of South View Pool
$
800,000
City'Parks Improvements (details on attached page)
$
4,500,000
TOTAL REFERENDUM COST
$
27,717,018
*These two are staffs preliminary estimates only and not that of the consultant.
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR A REFERENDUM
PARK & RECREATION
BALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
BALL FIELD & GROUNDS IRRIGATION:
ESTIMATE
Cornelia School Park little league field
$ 25,000
jCornelia
School Park (2 ball fields)
$ 60,000
1
Countryside Park (west baseball field ) -
$ 9,800
j
Courtney Ball Fields (Braemar Park field #4 )
$ 15,000
I
'Highlands Park 1 softball field
$ 30,000
1
Kenneth Rosland Park (baseball field )
$ 20,000
Pamela Park ounior soccer field
$ 20,000
Todd Park
$ 15,000
iTupa
Park
$ 20,000
j
Weber Park
$ 60,000
Wooddale Park
$ 15,000
F"DE
& SEED BALL FIELD:.
Cornelia School Park little league field
$ 40,000
Cornelia School Park (two ball fields )
$ 150,000
I
Countryside Park west baseball field
$ . 50,000
Courtney Ball Fields (Braemar Park field #4 )
$ 100,000
Highlands Park senior soccer field
$ 250,000
Lewis Park east soccer field
$ 250,000
Lewis Park west soccer field
$ 250,000
Lewis Park central soccer field
$ -250,000
Pamela Park 4th New field
$ 30,000
Rosland Park reorient baseball field
$ 30,000
Weber Park 1 baseball and 1 softball.field
$ 95;000.
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM:
Braemar West Arena
$ 75,000
Tupa Park Grange Hall and Cahill School
$ 50,000
I
I
REPLACE CONCESSIONS BUILDING:
Courtney Fields Complex - Braemar Park
$ 780,200
$ 1,495,000
$ 125,000
$ 780,200
1
PARK DEVELOPMENT
COMPLETION OF VAN VALKENBURG PARK:
j
Grading and landscaping j
$ 100,000
j
Hard surface court I
$ 15,000
Pathway I
$ 30,000
I
!Van
Playground equipment & misc. park equip. I
Valkenbur Park (3 batting cages) I
$ 100,000
$ 60,000
j
IMPROVED ENTRANCE TO PARK:
Arneson Acres Park (new island entrance )
$ 50,000
I
I
I I
j LIFT STATION FOR SANITARY SEWER:
Arneson Acres Park (greenhouse)
$ 35,000
I I
PATHWAY REPAIR/ADDITIONS:
Arneson Acres Park
j $ 30,000
Cornelia School Park
I $ 100,000
j Rosland Park
j $ 75,000
Walnut Ridge Park
j $ 60,000
I
PARKING
LOT REPAIR/ADDITION:
j Arneson Park
Braemar Arena
I $ 50,000
j $ 100,000
Rosland Park
I $ 300,000
Pamela Park south End
j " $ 60,000
j Weber Park
j $ 200,000
j
j
I
I
I
I
REPAIR /REPLACE FENCING:
j Bredesen Park
I $ 150,000 j
Cornelia School Park adult softball field
j $ 60,000
Courtney Ball Fields (field #4 )
$ 40,000
j Rosland Park (playground/picnic area
I $ 60,000
j Rosland Park baseball field
j $ 20,000
Weber Park
j $ 25,000
305,000
50,000
35,000
265,000
710,000
355,000
r'
REPLACE DUGOUTS:
Courtney Ball Fields (field #4 ) 40,000
$.. 40,000
TENNIS COURTS:
j Walnut Ridge Park rebuild $ 50,000
$ 50,000
TOTAL PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT $ 4,500,000
February 10, 2000
Dr. Kenneth Dragseth
Edina Public Schools
5701 Normandale Rd.
Edina, MN 55424
Mr. Gordon Hughes
Mr. John Keprios
City of Edina
4801 W 50' St.
Edina, MN 55424
Gentlemen:
Q� ee
International Dairy Oueen, Inc.
7505 Metro Boulevard
P.O. Box 39286
Minneapolis, MN 55439.0286
Telephone: (612) 830 -0200
As a supporter and believer in the Community Center Project, I would like to communicate my sincere
interest in attempting to bring a solution to one of the major hurdles highlighted recently with the project.
It is my understanding that both the School Board and the City Council are in support of the concept.
However, it appears that a significant issue remains which relates to the ongoing operating costs
associated with the facility and the resulting effects it has on the school's budget.
I would like to propose to you the following solution and one which I will do all that is possible in seeing
it come to fruition. Based upon the current study; the ongoing operating costs `would appear to be in the
ballpark of $138,000 annually: It is my understanding that the school is Nvillimg to absorb . approximately
$48,000 and is asking the city and other' users to generate about $90,000 of subsidy
To derive the $90,000 of funds, I see the following revenue generators `or cash inflows to support the
project:
I believe it is appropriate to have the associations of the user groups be responsible for a portion
of the cost to utilize the facilities. However, I am very concerned that the pricing be one that is
reasonable to the various associations without having a dramatic impact on the price which they
charge the children who participate in the various programs. Therefore, I am proposing that the
following annual fees be as follows:
A. Edina Boys Basketball Association
$ 7,000
B. Edina Girls Basketball Association
3,500
C. Edina Girls Traveling Basketball
1,500
D. Edina Park Board (for other gym programs)
3,000
Total Annual Association fees
$15,000
The facility will clearly be a wonderful campus for various summer camps and training programs.
I have little doubt that at least two additional camps could be scheduled within the facilities as
ell as a contract negotiated with MDB and/or "some other competitor which would provide
training capabilities at off hours:" Fain roughly estimating the revenues from these particular
activities at $10,000 peryear., fbelieve that these numbers are realistic andcould be confirmed
by Doug Johnson.' Keep in mind that in addition to camps, it is .possible to rent the facility out to
various tournament activities, i.e. AAU and state tournament programs. Total outside annual
revenue estimated at $10,000.
Dr. Kenneth Dragseth, Mr. Gordon Hughes, Mr. John Keprios
February 10, 2000
Page 2
The lion's share of the remaining operating cost will come from a foundation which will be set up
to support the community project. I have no doubt that private dollars can be. raised for the
purpose of the project. I believe that we will be able to raise at least $500,000 which would be
able to accommodate over $65,000 annually for a 10 -year period, assuming a 7% return on the .
cash balance. Funds would obviously be invested in a very conservative instrument to avoid any,
flux in the certainty of cash flow. This commitment would be in place for a 10 -year period of
time. I am hopeful to achieve a $1 million commitment of private proceeds. if we are able to
obtain a $1 million commitment, it would provide over 20 years of subsidy in the operating cost.
Under the above scenario, the school would be left with the additional operating costs above $90,000 on
an annual basis. The benefit to all the schools, (elementary, middle and high school) would be
tremendous. The value for the schools to have such a space available during the appropriate daypart is
significant. For example, the Normandale Elementary School would easily have the greatest gym space
or indoor recess space of any complex in the area. What a wonderful resource it could provide to the
growing needs of our schools.
The one piece in the above scenario that is of greatest concern is the dollars provided by the Foundation.
However, it is also the one piece which I firmly believe we can achieve in making a commitment to the
proposal. What I would like to receive from the Edina School Board and from the Edina City Council is
an endorsement and approval of the proposal, which would then permit me to solicit and set up
commitments from the general public. These commitments would be put in place prior to any referendum
voting so that the voters of the community would have assurance that the dollars were intact and
accounted for prior to the vote. Depending on the timing of the referendum, I would then put in place a
task force and set up the foundation in deriving the subsidy program. I am incredibly excited and willing
to help in any way to make this tape of structure viable. I would hope that the three of you as well as the
other elected officials would be in support of this approach, or something somewhat similar in nature..
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns which may have been generated from the
above thoughts. ' I sincerely appreciate your consideration and hope that your support .v, -ill make this
project become a reality for the City of Edina.
Sincerely,
INTE ATIONA4DAIREN, INC.
Charles W. Mooty
Executive Vice Pr, er,
Chief Financial & Administrative Officer
612/830 -0364
CM/kr /0208cml
From: John Weddle Fax: +1(612)929.6652 To: Dennis Maetzold Fax: 904.8919 Page 2 of 2 Monday, February 07, 2000 12:23 AM
To: Dennis Maetzold
Dear Mayor Maetzold:
5900 Arbour A venue
Edina, MN 55436
6121929 -6652
February 6, 2000
At: 904 -8919
Edina needs a new pool, and now is the perfect opportunity to build one, as part of the sports
referendum. I support this enthusiastically and you can count on me for whatever help I can
provide to get such a referendum passed.
We moved to Edina 12 years ago because of the excellence of its school system -and the great
opportunities and support it provides to youth. Current facilities at South View and Valley
View are not competitive with those in surrounding communities, and they haven't been for
some time. A few examples: Eden Prairie has an eight -lane pool and a six -lane pool;
Richfield has two eight =lane pools; the Bloomington schools have an eight -lane pool and a
six -lane pool; Hopkins has two six -lane pools; Minnetonka has two six -lane pools. Edina has
two five -lane pools, one of which dates to the middle of the last century! Edina families and
athletes support swimming wonderfully. Our high school teams are large and extremely
successful. It is time for Edina to catch up with our neighbors and invest some capital in the
community to help ensure an excellent environment for our excellent athletes.
It is also time to end the "home pool disadvantage Yes, that's right, Edina high school
teams (especially the girls) are at a disadvantage when they swim at home. Why? Because
home meets are only contested in four lanes because of our small pool. Away meets are
almost always contested in six lanes. Edina teams are very deep, but they can't use this
strength at home because athletes have to watch from the deck. Let's fix this and give our
hard - working athletes more opportunities to participate.
Our daughters have been swimming competitively for 13 years. We have been attending and
supporting high school swim meets for eight years. John serves as meet manager for the
boys' Section 6AA meet and as a meet official. We have also served on the board of two
local club teams. We've seen lots of pools and seen how communities support swimming.
No community supports swimming better than Edina, but other communities have managed
to build much better facilities. Now is the time for Edina to fix that.
Please let us know what we can do to help! Thank you!
Sincerely,
John & Michele Weddle
Y'
,y
EDYNTA PARK BOARD
7 :30 P.M.
EDINA.HISTORICAL SOCIETY ROOM
ARNESON ACRES PARK
JANUARY 11, 2000
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Herring, Chuck Mooty, Tom White, David Fredlund, Karla
Sitek, Andy Finsness, Floyd Grabiel, George Klus, Linda Presthus,
Bill Jenkins, John Murrin
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Todd Anderson
OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, Kay Wetherall, Rick Ites, John Towey, John Justice
I. APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 14, 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Floyd Grabiel MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 14, 1999 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Dave Fredlund SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRESENTATION AND MUSEUM TOUR -
BOB KOJETIN
Mr. Keprios introduced Bob Kojetin, President of the Edina Historical Society. Mr.
Kojetin then introduced Kay Wetherall, the executive secretary for the Edina Historical
Society. Mr. Kojetin and Ms. Wetherall gave the Park Board a tour of the Edina
Historical, Society.
Mr. Kojetin explained that the City of Edina is 110 years old. He then noted that the Park
Board is 70 years old and that the Park and Recreation Department is 45 years old. He
pointed out that the Park Board was developed basically because they wanted to protect
Minnehaha Creek because Minneapolis was moving up the creek and buying land.
Therefore, the Park Board was formed to stop building along the creek except in the
Country Club area. Mr. Kojetin indicated that the Park Board was an elected office until
_,1955 when Edina went into a city government and it became an appointed board.
Mr. Kojetin indicated that the Historical Society also has two other buildings they take
care of, the Grange Hall and the Old Cahill School. He noted that there are 11 members
on the Historical Society Board. He stated that at the Cahill School there are three part-
time teachers who conduct 172 days of school each year. He noted that kids from all over
the state come to the Old Cahill School. The program was been going on since 1971. He
IV
noted that it costs $150.00 per day for schools to come to Cahill School and that the
teachers are paid $80.00 a day.
Mr. Kojetin commented that last year their expenses were around $31,000 and they took
in $33,000, so budget wise they came out good. He also explained that their one big
fundraiser is a book sale that is held in October. Last year they raised approximately
$3,000 which was used to help operate the facility. Mr. Kojetin stated that the Historical
Society is open to the public for a few hours on Thursdays and Saturdays.
Mr. Kojetin pointed out where the books are that contain all of the history of Edina. He
noted that in the last year they have also started to do oral interviews of people who come
in and give a history of past relatives, families, etc. This way when people are trying to
find out about something they can sit down and listen to a tape. This is a fairly new
project they have currently been working on.
Mr. Kojetin explained that he does have a concern. The facility needs to be maintained
and taken care of and being a non - profit organization it is difficult to raise funds to
maintain a building of its size. He indicated that from the beginning the Historical
Society has always been under Park and Recreation and the city has always paid for the
heat, light, electricity as well as a janitor to come in and clean the downstairs. However,
there are starting to be more problems such as the ceiling is leaking, the outside exterior
needs painting as well as a few other items. He noted that these are items that they look
back to the city for funding. He also pointed out that Arneson Acres still needs a new
entrance as well as a new sign. He commented that possibly the Garden Club and
Historical Society can work together on these projects. However, he doesn't know that
they will be able to raise money for work on the actual building.
Mr. Herring thanked Mr. Kojetin for his time and for making the facility available for the
Park Board's meeting.
Mr. Keprios commented that we are very fortunate.to have the Historical Society, we
look at them like one of our Athletic Associations because they also provide a
tremendous service with volunteer help. They are a very active, dedicated group that we
are very fortunate to have.
III. BRAEMAR MEN'S CLUB PRESENTATION
Mr. Keprios indicated that the Braemar Men's Club asked to be put on the agenda
because they would like to voice their concerns and views as well as inform the Park
Board a about the Braemar Men's Club.
Rick Ites, last year's President of the Braemar Men's Club, stated that they are here to
help give some insight on what makes Braemar Golf Course a nice place and not just
from their perspective. He indicated that Braemar is self - supporting, however, they are
concerned when expenditures and capital improvements go up that the process might be
impaired in the future. He explained that there are going to need to be some significant
2
r�
items added to the new golf course. Mr. Valliere has received a lot of negative feedback
on this and has stated there are some capital items that have not yet been set in motion.
Mr. Ites indicated that they would therefore like to hear some direction that the Park
Board is going to take at the facility.
Mr. Towey explained that the basis of their concern lies in the fact that any good golf
course needs to have a continuing program to keep itself at the level it wishes to be. He
noted they are concerned that the Park Board has decided that some of the capital
expenditures that have been requested are not going to be considered. Therefore, they
want to know if that is a sign of what they are looking at down the road. Will funds that
are generated by the course going to always be put back into the golf course. He pointed
out that approximately 40 years ago one of the most prominent golf courses in the United
States was owned by the City of Minneapolis. It was self - sustaining and had a program
of regenerating income back into the course each year. However, sometime around 1960
much of the money that was generated started going into the general fund and not back
into the golf course. He indicated that in 1997 they did start to put a large scale of money
back into the golf courses. He noted that all went back to a decision that was made 40
years ago when the money looked so good that they put. it into the general fund, therefore,
the courses dipped so dramatically that they are not even a shadow of what they once
were. He explained that is an indication of how fast things can go if we are not able to
sustain the golf course. Mr. Towey stated that golf courses go in one of two directions,
they either go forwards or backgrounds, they do not stay the same.
Mr. Justice indicated that he is an Edina resident and does play a lot of golf at Braemar.
He stated that there are a lot of golf courses out there and Braemar is competing for the
golfer like everyone else. He noted that he would like to see improvements continue to be
made, the course cannot stand still.
Mr. Keprios indicated that one of the main reasons why some of the improvements that
were talked about aren't being done immediately is because the golf course first needs to
pay back its debt due to overspending on the development of the new nine. The golf
course has done very well financially and has been able to cover its bonded indebtedness
and operational expenses, as well as still have some money left over. Mr. Keprios stated
that.all of Braemar's cash deficit should be paid off before anything more is built. He
noted that was a staff decision and not the Park Board's.
Mr. Herring indicated that Mr. Valliere and his staff do an outstanding job, they're very
focused on costs and make sure that they get the most out of their investments and capital
spending with respect to the golf course. He noted that he feels even with the changes in
fees Braemar is still right down the middle given the quality of the golf course compared
to other area golf courses. Mr. Herring stated that he has played a lot of golf at Braemar
and he hears the concern that is being made. However, at this point he feels they are
making the necessary capital investments with respect to the equipment and facilities at
Braemar. He noted that he personally is not willing to commit that we would never want
to take excess funds from our golf courses and use them for other purposes. He stated
that his number one commitment, with respect to the income. that is received from the
r,
golf courses, is to make sure that we are making an adequate reinvestment to maintain the
high level of quality that we currently enjoy.
Mr. Herring stated that right now Park and Recreation is very capital constrained. This is
an issue throughout the whole system right now and is something that staff and the Park
Board are currently working on. Mr. Herring commented that his feeling is the golf
course is in good shape for the upcoming season. He noted he thinks that is what he is
hearing from the Braemar Men's Club, the concern is where are we going in the future.
Mr. Herring indicated that Mr. Keprios is very good at keeping his staff informed and
therefore if anything comes up Mr. Valliere will be made aware of it. He informed the
Braemar Men's Club that if there are any issues that come up he would like to hear from
them. He again noted that Braemar Golf Course is a very valued resource and we are
going to continue to maintain it.
IV. CITY /SCHOOL REFERENDUM
Mr. Keprios indicated that there was some very good discussion at the joint meeting with
the Park Board and City Council and one of the subjects that came up was the proposed
referendum. He noted that he and Mr. Mooty have tried to keep the Park Board informed
on what has been happening in the process. He explained that the Park Board really
hasn't been engaged on the development as far as input from the start. Therefore, it
might be a little premature to ask the Park Board to just outwardly endorse the whole
thing at this point because it is still taking shape. Mr. Keprios explained that currently
the architects are discussing what all of the possibilities are.
Mr. Klus stated that he heard that right now with everything added up there are 25 million
dollars worth of improvements. He asked how much of that has come from Park and
Recreation. Mr. Mooty commented that the most recent number has been 15 million
dollars and noted that he would like to try to give a little bit of perspective as to how it
has gotten to this point. He explained that it basically started because the seating at the
football stadium was being condemned and there was a group that was asked to be put
together to look at the possibility of really enhancing that whole football stadium. People
from the school district, school board, park board and some residents were asked to be
part of this process and so for a couple meetings there was simply discussion on what
potential improvements and enhancements would be appropriate for the football stadium
as well as what seemed to be feasible.
Mr. Herring noted that he thought this actually went back to some of the earlier
discussions regarding the senior center /community center at the Kunz Lewis site. Mr.
Mooty indicated that the issue to begin with was simply the football stadium at the
community center. He then explained that he has been a major proponent in trying to get
some additional gyms at the community center that he stuck his foot out to some degree
and asked to look at the possibility of having the gymnasium concept be added on to the
whole football stadium concept and therefore that was added. Not only were they
looking at adding new gymnasiums but were also looking at refurbishing some of the
gyms at South View Middle School and the community center. At that time other
4
components were being added such as having a new baseball facility, upgrading the
theatre, etc. and therefore it continued to gain momentum and as items were added the
cost continued to grow as well. Mr. Mooty commented that it is still being defined as far
as what is being done. The experts have been brought in to put together proposals as far
as the enhancements. Mr. Mooty indicated that he feels copies of the proposal need to be
given to the Park Board because it doesn't do justice to try to explain it without everyone
having a chance to read it.
Mr. Mooty pointed out that now what has happened is other groups are wanting to get
into this as well. One group wants to find a way to enhance the pools and another group
wants to find a way to figure out enhancements at other public facilities and parks. It has
really snowballed and we are to a point where anybody who has an interest in trying to do
something is trying to see what potentially can be tossed in the ring. Mr. Mooty stated
that none of the items are inappropriate or unjustified it's just that it has created its own
direction based upon the momentum right now. Therefore, that is why the Park Board
and the City to a large degree haven't been the ones dictating what all has been done
because it really started out as a school issue. However, once it looked like it was going
to become a bond issue we started to look at some of these things on school property and
avoid some of the additional investment of having to acquire property. This way we
would be able to utilize a lot of things that are already on school property from an
infrastructure standpoint. Also, the economics of trying to do it within a school
arrangement made the most sense as far as trying to pull this together. The schools do
not want to add more costs because from their standpoint they have decent capacity with
the gymnasiums and what not. Those are needs for park and recreation and after school
programs. Therefore, the City has had to step in to be viewed as being a major play in
this if it's to get off the ground. Mr. Mooty also pointed out there are geographic issues
as far as what can actually fit on that space because there are limitations as to what can be
done.
Mr. Klus noted that it seemed to.him at the meeting with the City Council last week that
the city is still opening the doors to new proposals and ideas. However, at the same time
it sounds like everyone is still pushing for a May referendum and he doesn't know how
that is going to work.
Mr. Mooty indicated that his concern is this project will take approximately three years to
complete. Therefore, if something is not approved by May we will lose another year of
utilization. Mr. Klus commented that the City is saying they want to get this done by
May, therefore, do we still have,time as a Park Board to give them input if they want our
=input. Mr. Mooty replied that it seems to him that as a board we need to focus on what
are our priorities as well as what would we like to see accomplished. Also, how does that
list fall in line with the list that's in this proposal and the list of projects from Park and
Recreation for 4 million. He noted that he thinks the City Council is just trying to get
some feedback from the Park Board to see if this all falls within our priorities. Is the
project fulfilling the needs of the Park Board as to what should be done. He commented
that some of the items aren't necessarily related to Park and Recreation, such as
enhancements to the theatre, etc.
5
I
Mr. Herring asked Mr. Murrin what his sense is of the school's boards feeling about this
and their. priorities. Mr. Murrin commented that first of all Mr. Mooty has had a huge
role in developing this, he did a lot to get people in the community interested in what we
can do for the kids to deal with some of the overflow issues that we have. He noted that
there is some very significant synergism from the school district's desire to get things
going. The School Board, however, is looking at this as a really great opportunity and is
pushing to see it done earlier rather than later. However, it's kind of out of the School
Board's area but he knows that the superintendent and the City have been talking about
the Kunz Lewis site for a long time. He noted that the school district owns the bus garage
and that the City needs that property to help make everything work and so that also
comes into play.
Mr. Keprios explained that the Kunz Lewis issue really did spark a lot of ideas and
creative thinking. He indicated that at that time the City Council directed staff to follow -
up on studies to show whether their ideas would work or not and one of the thoughts was
to have a community center at the Kunz Lewis site. Therefore, every community center
in the Twin Cities area was studied and his report pointed out how park and recreation is
desperately in need of extra gym space. At that time, Mr. MacHolda was then sent off on
a charge to study the gym situation and after his comprehensive study it was determined
that we are a minimum of four gymnasiums short but ideally we could use an additional
six gymnasiums. Mr. Keprios indicated that once there was talk of having a community
center that is when the neighborhood groups and associations got on the band wagon and
came up with a wonderful proposal. The proposal was to build an indoor football
stadium with gymnasiums and a senior center and all the needs of Edina were going to be
fulfilled within this one structure. Mr. Keprios indicated that after this he was then sent
on a charge by the City Council to look into a public /private partnership that would
accomplish the gymnasium aspect and still have a health club atmosphere. After that the
Edina Swim Club came forward asking for a 50 meter indoor pool. Therefore, a study
was done on 50 meter pools which showed that they cost a lot of money to operate and
begged the question who is going to pay for that. Mr. Keprios stated that in all of this he
thinks that staff really helped to identify what the true needs are versus the desires. There
is definitely a need in Edina for gymnasiums, a better swimming facility and we are
definitely short of field space. These are the key items. He commented that the
auditorium, bleachers and a few other items are, in his view, primarily more school
related issues.
Mr. Keprios explained that there are still some things that need to fall into place as we
head down the road with this referendum. First of all, we need to figure out who is going
to pay for the operational expenses and how are they going to be paid. Secondly, if
there's going to be a charge how much is it going to be. Thirdly, who is going to control
the facility, will there be some kind of a joint powers agreement between the City and
School District as far as access to it. He pointed out that park and recreation currently
receives calls from the school district saying we can't use a gym at a particular time
because something has come up. When this happens all of the coaches need to be
notified so that they can inform their players. He stated that this has been an ongoing
R
significant problem for years. He also noted that park and recreation programs cannot use
the high school gymnasiums on Wednesday evenings because that is the night they clean
the facility and it's those types of issues we constantly have to deal with. Therefore, we
need to get something in writing if we are going into this joint venture.
Mr. Klus asked if what he is hearing is that the Park Board doesn't need to be concerned
tonight about looking at items for the bond issue. There is still time to do this in the
future and asked where are we at with this. Mr. Keprios replied that people need to be
informed before they vote and if they are not, it's going to probably be a no vote. We
need ample time to inform the public and answer their questions. His opinion is that right
now to have a vote in May is going to be tough but it is possible. Mr. Herring
commented that for the last referendum Mr. Jenkins attended all of the neighborhood
meetings at each park and explained how it was going to be done and he feels that was
critical to the success of the last referendum.
Ms. Presthus indicated that some of the facilities, such as the classrooms, are clearly
school facilities and have nothing to do with the city. Therefore, isn't the city going to
have a little problem voting on a referendum on things that aren't for them. Mr. Mooty
responded that on that particular item the school will finish that space out of their own
dollars.
Ms. Presthus commented that some of the concerns she has heard is whose money is this.
Mr. Mooty replied that is going to be a big issue that both the City Council and School
District have to try to figure out. He noted there is a split there but it's very confusing in
trying to figure out where the split is. However, they feel very comfortable that the legal
issue can be dealt with. It's going to be hard to figure out how to properly allocate it.
Ms. Presthus stated that's where the concern is, as it keeps growing how many things can
be put in it. Mr. Murrin indicated that if it's a school item there is money that they can
allocate to it. He noted that as he understands it the city and school are pretty much in
tune on this and they don't seem to have a conflict.
Mr. Murrin stated that if the school wants to add something and it's totally their program
there are funds to pay for it. In fact there is state money for the stadium because it has
been condemned. Mr. Herring stated that if there's money for the stadium then it's not in
the referendum. Mr. Murrin noted there is money for just the bleachers, nothing else. It
would still part of the referendum because there are other things that need to be done.
Mr. White asked what is the time line on the bleachers, when do they have to be done.
Mr. Mooty replied that it is his understanding that by the end of this calendar year a
formal plan has to be in written form and approved by the state indicating that it's going
to be done in a certain time period.
Mr. White indicated that he doesn't feel comfortable voting on this tonight to approve it
and send it off to the City Council. He asked if it, can be put off until the February Park
Board meeting where Mr. Keprios can address the concerns that have been made, which
are all valid and important. Mr. Mooty commented so that the Park Board is not the one
holding up the process in addition to reviewing the proposal we should also be reviewing
7
A
I
the proposals by staff as far as items they Nvould like to see done if we were to have
additional dollars put in. Therefore, we are looking at both issues at the same time so that
at the February Park Board meeting we are looking at both sides of the picture. Ms.
Presthus commented that we are already three months behind, don't we need to do it now
or at least say we will be willing if crunch comes to crunch. Mr. Jenkins noted that it's
not going to be done in May because there are still too many things up in the air. He
stated that the key to this whole thing is educating the people and letting them know
what's going on.
Mr. Klus indicated that he thought he heard Mayor Maetzold say the referendum has to
go in May. Therefore, if the Park Board doesn't take action tonight is that going to be
okay. Mr. Keprios replied that the school would like to shoot for May.
Mr. Murrin stated that his feeling is that by delaying this it is like a no vote. He stated
that what he is hearing is May is a better time to have the referendum than in November
for the general election. Mr. Jenkins commented that November is not a good time to do
this. Mr. Murrin noted that there has been a lot of work done on this and sometimes time
is of the essence. He pointed out that there has been talk about private funding behind
this and he feels it's an opportunity whose time is here. Therefore, it would be nice if, the
Park Board could give its blessing in some way and at the next meeting we will be
prepared with all of the information and what has been thought out by the professionals.
Mr. Mooty commented that if the pool issue comes into play and the Park Board elements
come into play there is no way the referendum will take place in May because there are
too many other dimensions that are going to need greater explanation. He noted that he
believes if it is just the community center concept that is something that can easily be
explained in a time period that could suffice. However, he doesn't think that is probably
ideal, but it could suffice if it is just the community center concept. Mr. Mooty stated
that his perspective is depending on what all is potentially added into it is what is really
going to dictate the time frame that's going to be doable.
Mr. White again commented that he doesn't think the Park Board has enough information
to vote on this tonight. He stated that he's okay giving his initial blessing that we will
vote on it next month but is not quite sure what that will do.
Mr. Mooty commented that right now we don't even know what we are voting on. He
stated that what he thinks the Park Board has control of is listing the' priority of what we
want money for. What are the needs and what is it going to cost to fulfill those needs. If
we are comfortable with the listing that was put together by staff that could then be
proposed to the City Council as to what we think is relevant. He noted that he thinks this
group is relatively knowledgeable on the proposals of improvements that have been put
forth. However, are those. ones that we think we should be asking for or do we think we
should be asking for more. Mr. Mooty commented that is something he feels the Park
Board can try to make a decision on.
Mr. Herring indicated that what he read in the staff report is that the City Council wants
the Park Board to make a recommendation regarding the city /school referendum. Mr.
Klus stated that what he thought the City Council was asking for was a recommendation
from the Park Board on what they would like to see added to, the referendum., Mr.
Keprios commented that he understands the directive to be "Does the Park Board endorse
or not endorse the referendum."
Mr. Herring commented that his problem is he's not sure what's in and what's not in as
well as what is the City paying for and what is the School District paying for. Also, he's
not sure what the joint use agreement is going to be. Mr. Herring also noted that there are
a lot of things on the capital expenditure plan that he feels more strongly about than
swimming pools. He noted that he can't just say yes, we want everything on our capital
expenditure plan to be included in the referendum.
George Klus MOVED TO TABLE .THE RECOMMENDATION ON THE
K
REFERENDUM PROPOSAL UNTIL THE FEBRUARY PAR BOARD MEETING.
Mr. White indicated that he would like the Park Board members to receive a copy of the
packet. next week to read over the next few weeks and that way we will all be informed
and ready to go at the February Park Board meeting. He noted that he doesn't want to
delay the process but it can't be voted on tonight. Mr. Mooty replied that he also doesn't
think we can vote tonight. However; when everyone looks at the proposal they also need
to see if there are other things that should be added as well as list the priorities. He also
noted that we still don't have anything on the pool so at this time we can't make any
judgment on the pool.
Mr. Finsness noted that in the capital budget there is a lot of money going into the fields
and indicated he would like to know how pressing it is for that to be done next year. Is it
something that could wait another year.
Ms. Sitek indicated that her biggest concern is this agreement. Are we going to be able to
deal with the school and will we have the information on the. operating costs,' etc., done
by next month. Mr. Keprios replied that he honestly doesn't know, that's an important
question. Mr. White commented that one of the things we can say to the City Council is
we vote yes to go forward with this but only with these caveats and then list those.
Floyd Grabiel SECONDED THE MOTION.
IN FAVOR: Chuck Mooty, Andy Herring, Tom White, Andy Finsness, Bill Jenkins,
Karla Sitek, Linda Presthus, Floyd Grabiel, David Fredlund, George Klus
OPPOSED: John Murrin
E
V. MEMORIALS AND DONATIONS POLICY
Mr. Herring stated that with the lateness of the hour he would like to put the donations
and memorial policy off until the next Park Board meeting.
VI. BRAEMAR PARK PATHWAY UPDATE
Mr. Herring indicated that he is satisfied with the staff report on the Braemar Park
pathway update. Mr. Grabiel asked does he understand correctly that what is in white is
currently there and what is noted in red is to be built at some point in the future. Mr.
Keprios noted that the parts in red are by the Bloomington border and those areas we are
struggling with as far as getting easements. However, we do have a new strategy in place
and will be trying again. Ms. Presthus asked how long is the path to which Mr. Keprios
replied he has asked the Engineering Department to put a wheel to it when it is
completed. Right now it is approximately three miles.
VII. COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES REPORT - LINDA PRESTHUS
Ms. Presthus handed out a brochure and indicated that they have been working very hard
on this program. They are not going to do it every year because it is such a big thing but
it looks like it's going to be a good event.
Ms. Presthus indicated that they also have three web sites that they are using as a
fundraiser which is on -line shopping. The kick back goes to the school and all you have
to do is register with them. It's a great fundraiser for community education programs.
VIII. OTHER
A. Year 2000 Park Board Meetin,, Schedule - Mr. Herring reminded the Park Board
members that the next meeting is on Wednesday, February 90', at the Edina Art Center.
B. Asset Buildine Town Meeting Reminder (Tuesday, February 8`h).- Mr. Herring
indicated that this is a very important meeting and asked that everyone attend if possible.
C. Sale of Park Land (Fox Meadow Park) and Memorial Policy - Mr. Herring asked Mr.
Keprios to take these two topics off of the February Park Board agenda. He indicated
that he wants to have plenty of time to talk about the referendum. Mr. Klus asked Mr.
Keprios to also send out a map of where Fox Meadow Park is located so he is familiar
with it.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Chuck Mooty MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:15 P.M. Karla Sitek
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
10
FROM FAX NO. Jul. 29 1999 01:26PM P1
1. '`'m a 6" grader who has already been swimm.in for
5 years for the .Edina Swim Club and plan to g
compete for Edina high school next year. Please add
a new competitive pool to the spring sports
referendum. The pool at South View is old and the
bad ventilation makes us sick sometimes. Valley
View is newer but does not have enough lanes to
properly host meets, Edina Swim. Club sometimes
uses Edinborough, but it is too hot and too shallow
for long workouts. We need a new pool badly. Most
of our competitors have betters pools than we do.
Sincerely,
Colton. L e
fi�en� ion � fir%/ �unG � Hem berf,
R��
6pr*(Al SPorIS e�ea'erlalUM
°e, o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
.f
ABBB
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Joyce Repya
Associate Planner
Date: February 15, 2000
Subject: East Edina Housing
Foundation Audited
Financial Statements.
December 31, 1998 and 1997
Agenda Item:
Consent
❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Enclosed for your information are the 1998 and 1997 audited financial
statements for the East Edina Housing Foundation. These statements which were
prepared by the accounting.firm, Grant Thornton were accepted by the Foundation's
Board of Directors at their February 1, 2000, annual meeting.
EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
December 31, 1998 and 1997
i
Accountants and Grant Thornton ffis
Management Consultants
GRANT THORNTON LLP
The US Member Firm of
Grant Thornton International
i
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors
East Edina Housing Foundation
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of East Edina
Housing Foundation (a Minnesota not - for -profit corporation) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Foundation's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, .
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all mate -
rial respects, the financial position of East Edina Housing Foundation as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then ended in confor-
mity with generally accepted accounting principles.
. LG
L
Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 6, 1999
500 Pillsbury Center North
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Tel: 612 332.0001
Fax: 612 332 -8361
East Edina Housing Foundation
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
December 31,
ASSETS
1998
1997
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (note A)
$ 344,430
$ 54$,695
Investments (notes A and B)
1,415,604
1,328,973
Accrued interest receivable from investments
139,769
102,266
Total current assets
1,899,803
1,979,934
NONCURRENT ASSETS
Investments (notes A and B)
2,124,640
1,415,020
Second mortgage notes receivable, less reserve for
uncollectible notes of $110,900 in 1998 and 1997
(note C)
1,620,862
1,942,266
City of Edina administered notes receivable
29,765
29,765
Accrued interest receivable from second mortgage
-notes, less reserve for uncollectible notes of
$49,332 in 1998 and 1997 (note C)
608,146
690,392
Total noncurrent assets
4,383,413
4,077,443
$6,283,216
$6,057,377
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 24,175 $ 22,445
COMMITMENTS (note D) - -
NET ASSETS - unrestricted 6,259,041 6,034,932
$6,283,216 $6,057,377
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
East Edina Housing Foundation
STATEMENTS OF ACTIVITIES
Years ended December 31,
Support and revenue
Interest income from second mortgage notes (note C)
Interest income from cash and equivalents and investments
Expenses
Program services
Write -off and reserve of second mortgage notes
and accrued interest
City of Edina staff wages (note D)
Program grants
Supporting services
Change in net assets
Net unrestricted assets at beginning of year
Net unrestricted assets at end of year.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
1998
$ . 55,728
215,634
271,362
26;175
26,175
21,078
47,253
224,109
6,034,932
$6,259,041
1997
$ 79,077
190,372
269,449
18,096
24,445
8,000
50,541
8,917
59,458
209,991
5,824,941
$6,034,932
0
East Edina Housing Foundation
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31,
Cash flows from operating activities:
Change in net assets
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to.
net cash provided by operating activities:
Write -off and reserve of second mortgage
notes and accrued interest
Change in assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable
Mortgage notes receivable
City of Edina administered notes receivable
Accounts payable
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investments
Proceeds from maturities of investments
Net cash used in investing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
1998 1997
$ 224,109 $ 209,991
18,096
44,743 (2,389)
321,404 283,515
- (12,785)
1,730 722
591,986 497,150
(2,916,520) (2,646,345)
2,120,269
2,208,872
796,251
4( 37,473)
(204,265)
59,677
548,695
489,018
$ 344,430 $ 548,695
The Foundation expended no cash for interest or income taxes during the years ended Decem-
ber 31, 1998 and 1997.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
East Edina Housing Foundation
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31;1998 and 1997
NOTE A — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
East Edina Housing Foundation (the Foundation) assists in providing affordable housing for
low and moderate income persons in the eastern and northwestern portion of the City of Edina,
Minnesota.
A summary of significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the
financial statements follows.
Basis of Presentation
The Foundation's net assets, revenues, expenses, gains, and losses are classified based on the
existence or absence of donor - imposed restrictions. The Foundation's unrestricted net assets
are not subject to donor - imposed restrictions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Foundation considers all highly liquid temporary investments with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, substantially all
of the Foundation's cash and cash equivalents were held at one financial institution in Minne-
sota. At times, cash held at the financial institution exceeded FDIC insurance limits.
Investments
The Foundation's debt securities are recorded at fair value based on quotes available at the bal-
ance sheet date, with gains and losses included in the statement of activities. The Foundation's
certificates of deposit are recorded at amortized cost, which approximate market value.
Income Taxes
The Internal Revenue Service has determined that the Foundation is exempt from federal
income tax under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as an organization described in
Section 501(c)(3). Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is provided.
i�
i
East Edina Housing Foundation
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
December 31, 1998 and 1997
NOTE A — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — Continued
Use of Estimates
Preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE B — INVESTMENTS
Investments consisted of the following at December 31:
Certificates of Deposit
Current
Noncurrent
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies
Current
Noncurrent
NOTE C — SECOND MORTGAGE NOTES
1998 1997
$1,215,354
$ 828,146
1,423,532
614,207
2,638,886
1,442,353
200,250
500,827
701,108
800,813
901,358
1,301,640
$3,540,244 $2,743,993
The Foundation acts as the exclusive developer of certain undeveloped property in the City of
Edina. In this capacity, it provides second mortgage financing to qualified individuals to assist
in the purchase of condominium units in a residential, retail, and office mixed project. Interest
is accrued on these notes at a simple, non - compounded annual rate of 5.00 %. The entire prin-
cipal and accrued interest portion of the notes are due upon the re -sale of the unit, or when the
first mortgage is paid off. These second mortgage notes are collateralized by the underlying
property, subject to the first mortgage.
East Edina Housing Foundation
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
December 31, 1998 and 1997
NOTE C — SECOND MORTGAGE NOTES — Continued
The Foundation receives second mortgage notes from the private developer of the project (see
note D) in exchange for cash or in consideration of property previously transferred to the
developer and improvements undertaken by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina on such property-
NOTED — COMMITMENTS
The Foundation has entered into two agreements which define its responsibilities toward the
development of the project described in note C. The first, with the Housing and Redevelop-
ment Authority of Edina as owner of the property, designates the Foundation as the exclusive
redeveloper of the project. The second agreement, between the Foundation and a private
developer, sets out the responsibilities for developing the property and providing the second
mortgage note financing.
The Foundation has also entered into an agreement with a community bank to provide devel-
opment assistance in conjunction with the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
Community Homebuyers Program. In addition, this program provides deferred payment loans
for basic home improvements in conjunction with a home purchase.
Additionally, the Foundation has entered into an agreement with the City of Edina in which the
City will be reimbursed for services provided to the Foundation.
NOTE E — RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Year 2000 issue relates to limitations in computer systems and applications that may
prevent proper recognition of the year 2000. The potential effect of the Year 2000 issue on the
Foundation and its business partners will not be fully determinable until the year 2000 and
thereafter. If Year 2000 modifications are not properly completed either by the Foundation or
entities with whom the Foundation conducts business, the Foundation's financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Qks Ice,
PoS�
Our Lady of Grace School
5051 Eden Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Sir:
We are students in the fifth grade at Our Lady of Grace School. As you
may know, we are celebrating Catholic Schools Week. We are writing to
thank you for the hard work you do for our community.
We thank you for the following ways in which you provide services for us:
Parks when we want to play
Roads plowed so we can get to different places k
Libraries so we can read
Keeping our environment clean
Keeping our school area safe
Lake Cornelia where we have our marathon.
We also enjoy having things for our personal enjoyment: pools, movie
theaters, great shopping centers, and restaurants.
For all the things you provide us, we are grateful.
Yours truly,
AM-
OLG 5th Grade Students a d Mrs. Judy Ross
I
' M.rnr v
TO UALA-
�V-4-K, :,A I -
-
.o
0
Dear Sir,
My name is William Bullard, and I am writing in regard to the possibility that a new pool
might be included in the Spring Sports Referendum package. 1 have swum for the past six years,
partly for the high school team, and partly for the Edina Swim Club. Both swim programs would
be greatly enriched by the addition of new 25 yard racing pool. The pools which are currently
available for the swim teams have several problems. For example, Valley View pool, where most
of the high school swim meets take place, has little deck space, wide temperature fluctuations, and
most importantly, has only five lanes. The construction of a new pool would benefit swimmers of
all ages in Edina and would likely attract many others to the growing swim programs. Please
consider the addition of a new pool.
�4'z
Sincerely,
Z"� Aoe'6-
William Bullard
Dear Sir:
My name is s Jean Bullard and I am a swimmer for the Edina Gators. I am thirteen years
old and have been swimming since I was seven years old. I have been informed that the city of
Edina is considering building a new twenty -five yard indoor pool. This is fabulous news to me. I
love to swim, but Valley View's and South View's pools are not in the best shape. The condition
of a pool is such an important part of swimming that it would be a shame to let this opportunity
slip past us. I think it would be a very wise decision if the city of Edina should decide to build a
new pool. Thank you very much for listening to me.
Sincerely,
Jean Bullard
xlzl
Dear Sir,
I am a citizen of the town of Edina. I am ten years old. I am a swimmer on the Edina
swim club (Gators). I swim every weekday and compete in many meets. From my experience the
towns around Edina - Richfield, Bloomington and Hopkins have better and bigger pools.
Although we have a large and nice outdoor pool, Sothview and Vallyview middle school are very
cramped and not in very good shape. The city of Edina could put to use a good pool. Please
consider this.
Sincerely,
I)AtA oL� -4d cuZk
Nicholas Bullard
Mr. Dennis Maetzold
Ms. Nan K. Faust
Mr. Michael F. Kelly
Mr. James. B. Hovland
Mr. Scott W. Johnson
February 6, 2000
Dear City Council Member:
As a "state of the art" community that prides ourselves in the opportunities availed to our citizens,
urge you to strongly consider the inclusion of a modern day swimming facility in any spring sports
referendum.
There are several reasons we should consider this as a community:
1) The existing pools at the junior high facilities are unhealthy and disgusting in addition to being
grossly inadequate and outdated. The gutters in the Valley View pool do not work, thereby creating
an unhealthy situation for our children. Phlegm and sputum float like jellyfish throughout the pool.
Locker room areas do not drain properly. Urine intermingles with shower water in the walkways to
create dangerous slippery and disgusting sanitary conditions. Ask a swim kid about these conditions.
My son just told me of this and I am appalled.
2) The pools are too small for effective use. The pools cannot accommodate the entire high school
swim team without splitting the squad. Divers must compete for space with the swimmers,
effectively reducing an already small 5 lane pool to 3 during practice. No wonder we loose many
good swimmers and their families to the neighboring communities with more "modern" facilities.
3) One of the factors in the attraction of new citizens to our community is the availability of first
class sports facilities for their children. Our swimming facilities are not even second class when
compared to newer facilities in our neighboring communities. Richfield, for example, has a much
better indoor swimming facility. Our facilities qualify for the "worst" award and would be challenged
only by St. Louis Park and Cooper in a contest for the disgrace of the Classic Lake Conference.
Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Chaska, Apple Valley ...:.any place else has better
facilities available for their children.
4) A newer and larger pool would benefit our community at large. Edina boasts one of the largest
swim clubs in the state. At present our children use four different pools for practice. This creates a
scheduling and logistics nightmare for families and instructors alike. It creates conflicts with our
private school partners (Blake) and our senior citizen designated facilities (Edenborough).
We are a first class community. We have supported substantial investments for our hockey and golf
facilities. Please give the citizens a chance to support the health and well being for our swimming
population as well. They deserve better than what we have offered to them as community leaders.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE BUDGET FOR A NEW POOL IN THE UPCOMING REFERENDUM.
Sincerely,
John Myers
6724 Rosemary Lane
Edina, MN 55439
612- 829 -1388 (h)
612 - 996 -1610 (w)
Email: Jmyers @nve.com
February 4, 2000
Edina City Council
Edina, MN 55424
TO: The Members of the Edina City Council
As a resident of Edina on Continental Drive for the past 14 years I read with interest of the traffic
tie -ups in Parkwood Knolls and the studies and discussions which are to take place in order to
alleviate this problem.
Over a year ago I spent quite some time trying to learn why stripes had been painted on Vernon
by Hennepin County in order to discontinue the use of 4 -lane traffic and turn it into a much
slower 2 -lane road. My conversations were with the City of Edina who claimed that this was
done without their knowledge and against their wishes by the traffic engineering group of
Hennepin County. It was my opinion that the purpose of a traffic engineering department was to
help move traffic rather than to hinder the traffic flow. In discussions with county commissioners
and with county officials it was determined that after four months in use, they had no intention to
make a change back to the four -lane system. Thus we now have long lines of single lane traffic
going each way making it very difficult to enter Vernon from any of the side streets. Now that
we are living with this action, I can hardly believe that they are considering putting a traffic
signal at the corner of Vernon and Gleason Roads which will only add-to the tie -up of single lane
traffic on Vernon during the heavy traffic hours. These roads were never meant to handle the
kind of volume that Highways 169 and 62 are suppose to handle.
Now that we have metering onto these roads, drivers are being forced to find any mode they can
in order to travel anywhere. Why should residential homeowners be forced to take the brunt of
these questionable decisions by the county and state highway departments? A traffic. signal at the
corner of Vernon and Gleason will only add to the total congestion in the area and will also
increase the amount of traffic coming onto Gleason from the Vernon extension on the west.
These residential streets ate not meant for this industrial /commercial traffic .
Two years ago, prior to single lane striping on Vernon, and prior to the metering of traffic onto
our freeways, we had a free -flow of traffic and no tie -ups in or around Parkwood Knolls
including Vernon. Let's get back to logical thinking.
Thank you.
Bill Otteson
5704 Continental Drive
Edina, MN 55436
ROY TERWILLIGER
Assistant Minority Leader
115 State Office Building
100 Constitution Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55155 -1206
(651) 296 -6238
Home:
6512 Navaho 17rail
Edina, MN 55439
(612) 941 -8258
February 3,-2000
Debra A. Mangen
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Mn 55424 -1394
Dear Debra:
r�rRr Ir r r >I> raTSSr�
Senate
State of Minnesota
Many thanks for your January 20, 2000 letter enclosing a copy of the Edina Resolution 42000 -12
opposing proposed legislation SF2133/HF2137.
I appreciate very much the thoughtful commentary that was contained in the resolution of
opposition and will certainly do what I. can to assist in making certain that the. City of Edina's
significant interest is protected in this matter. Please keep me posted on the things you might
hear at the city level and I will be following it closely at this end.
Best regards,
Si re ,
RO RWILLIGER
St Senator
RT:pr
cc: Senator Dennis Frederickson
COMMITTEES: Governmental Operations and Veterans • Children, Families and Learning •
Health and Family Security • Commission on Pensions and Retirement • Council
Recycled Paper
10%posl- on Black Minnesotans
Consumer Fiber SERVING: Eden Prairie • Edina -
56
DIG-
January, 2000
A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with
the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for period of up to two years and can be
viewed bythe public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and /or specific questions.
Metropolitan Council
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN; 55101. For further information
regarding the contents of this publication, contact Sandra Lindstrom at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651)
602 -1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Call the Metro Information Line at (651) 602 -1888 for recorded information about
upcoming Council meetings and regional events, currentjob openings and Section 8 housing information. Recent Council,
publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area. Publications can be ordered by e -mail. The address is:
data.center@nietc.state.nm.us Comments can be made to that address as well.as (651)602 -1500, the Metro Council Public
Continent Line. Check the internet web site at http: / /www.metrocouncil.org.
The Council...
Environment
adopted a resolution to implement an
understanding with the City of St. Paul on
how to measure and bill for wastewater flow
for the years 1999 -2002
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
award and execute a contract with the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder, U.S.
Filter, for providing Calcium Nitrate for
odor control in sanitary sewers at a unit
price of $0.432 per pound.
confirmed the benefit of street, sidewalk and
storm sewer improvements to the Council -
owned Hastings wastewater treatment
facility, for which special assessments have
been levied by the City of Hastings.
approved the establishment of a
Reconveyance /Cost Sharing Task Force and
confirmed the appointments made by the
Chair of the Council.
Livable Communities
• awarded a $450,000 LCA inclusionary
Housing Account grant to the City of
Chaska to support the Chaska Brickyard
multifamily rental housing program.
reviewed and adopted the review record for
the City of Roseville's Comprehensive Plan
with the following recommendations:
That the City of Roseville may place its
comprehensive plan into effect with:no
plan' modifications;
That the city be encouraged to
incorporate the additions into its
housing element as suggested in the
housing section review; and
3. That the plan meets all of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act
requirements for 1998 plan updates.
11 'T
ME___1_','TR�0'D1GE'S 7,
• reviewed and adopted the review record for
the City of Marine on the St. Croix Year
2020 Comprehensive Plan Update with the
following recommendations:
1. that the City of Marine on the St. Croix
may place its Year 2020 Comprehensive
Plan into effect and no plan
modification is required;
2. that the plan meets all of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act
requirements for 1998 plan updates; and
3. that the Council review the Regional
Growth Strategy's Rural Growth Center
designation for the City of Marine on
the St. Croix. Because the city's future
development will not be sewered, but
will be on larger lots served by
individual sewage treatment systems,
the city meets the definition of a
Permanent Rural Area, rather than that
of a Rural Growth Center.
• considered the establishment of a
Metropolitan Council Family Housing
Program and took the following actions:
1. established an Affordable Family
Housing Program of up to 300 units;
2. approved the administrative budget as
submitted enabling the Metro HRA to
hold the Annual Contributions Contract
for the development and operation of up
to 300 federally- assisted public housing
family units in Anoka, Hennepin
(excluding the Cities of Bloomington,
St. Louis Park and Minneapolis), and
Ramsey (excluding the City of St. Paul)
Counties;
3. authorized its Regional Administrator to
execute the necessary documents to
effectuate the transfer of federal annual
Page 2
contributions contract authority related
to the settlement of the Hollman vs.
Cisneros case from Minneapolis PHA to
the Metropolitan Council;
4. authorized the use of Section 8
operating reserves up to $200,000 per
year for a maximum of three years to
support the start up of a family housing
program; and
5. approved a fiscal year 2000 budget
amendment as reflected in the
administrative budget that was
presented, which includes additional
staffing positions and use of Section 8
operating reserves.
• reviewed and adopted the review record for
Grey Cloud Island Township's revised 2020
Comprehensive Plan and Critical Area Plan
revision with the following
recommendations:
that Grey Cloud Island Township may
place the 1999 -2020 Comprehensive
Plan and Critical Area Plan into effect
with the exception of plans pertaining to
the Mississippi River Critical Area,
which are subject to review and
approval by the DNR;
2. that the plan meets all of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act
requirements for 1998 plan updates,
conditional on the township adopting
official controls before May 15, 2000, to
implement the Council's Interim
Strategy to Reduce Non -point Source
Pollution;
3. that the Metropolitan Council transmit
findings of consistency with the
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area
Executive Order 79 -19 with the
recommendation that the township
include provisions in its revised
January, 2000
r
IT
MET"o Dl(iEs
ordinance to permanently protect the
identified Conservancy District and
other sensitive land and water resources
that are identified in the plan;
4. that the Metropolitan,Council transmit
findings of consistency with the
Mississippi National River and
Recreation Area to the National Park
service - MNRRA with the
recommendation that the National Park
Service work with the township and the
state Historic Society to help protect and
interpret cultural resources; and
5. that the Metropolitan Council recognize
and. support the township's efforts to
retain the rural open space character of
the Critical Area in fact finding reports
related to future annexation hearings.
• approved the City of Oak Grove's
Comprehensive Plan with the following
recommendations:
1. that the City of Oak Grove may place its
2020 Comprehensive Plan into effect
with no plan modifications; and
2. that the plan meets all of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act
requirements for 1998 plan updates.
• approved the City of Rosemount's 2020
Comprehensive Plan with the following
recommendations:
1. -that the City of Rosemount may place its
2020 Comprehensive Plan into effect
and no plan modifications are required;
2. the city should require ghost platting in
its large lot rural, residential subdivisions
or encourage clustering in its rural
residential. areas to preserve more open
space and allow the possibility of future
Page 3
urbanization if conditions in the rural
residential areas change; and
3:. that the city is strongly encouraged to
allow higher densities in its urban
residential districts than the plan calls
for. It should consider language that
will permit higher densities in return for
excellence of design and construction on
a case -by -case basis.
• . authorized its Regional Administrator to
.execute two -year time extensions for the
Dakota county, Ramsey County and Scott
County GIS Data Sharing Agreements with
the Council.
Management
• reconsidered, and adopted a revision to, the
resolution passed on September 22, 1999,
regarding a housing development to be
undertaken by the Carver County Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and
authorizing the pledge of the general
obligation credit ofthe Council to certain
bonds.
Parks
• approved amendments to the Metropolitan
Parks and Open Space Commission's
bylaws.
• submitted a 2001 LCMR request seeking up
to Sl 1.2 million to finance a portion of the
2000 -2001 Metropolitan Regional Parks
Capital Improvement Program.
• reviewed St. Paul's East Bank Mississippi
River Regional. Trail Corridor Master Plan
and took the following actions:
1. approved East Bank Mississippi River
Regional Trail Corridor Master Plan;
January, 2000.
ME�' III IT
TR�O DlEiEs
2. "" supported St. Paul's request that
MnDOT widen trails beneath the
Shepard Road /35E overpass to provide
12' clear for trail uses and consider
construction of a trail underpass, or
tunnel beneath 35E, riverward of
Shepard Road for safety of trail users
with 35E on /off ramps;
requested that St. Paul coordinate with
the Science Museum to study design
and funding alternatives to connect a
grade- separated pedestrian crossing
between the new Science Museum and
the East River Regional Trail;
4. requested that St. Paul continue
pursuing implementation of a bluff
staircase to access the Wabasha Bridge;
and
requested that St. Paul communicate
with the Metropolitan Council as
necessary about any plans at the Lower
Landing that may affect the Regional
Trail development.
• reviewed the Normandale Bandshell and
path lighting grant amendment requests and
took the following action:
amended grant SG -97 -224 to extend the
end date to December 31, 2001, for the
Metropolitan Council portion of the
grant; and increased the grant by
$190,000 with funds SG- 98 -49, pending
approval by the Legislative Commission
on Minnesota Resources; and
2. amended grant SO -98 -49 to delete from
the list of deliverables "complete
lighting of 1.9 mile loop path around
Normandale Lake, including light poles,
engineering and installation costs" and
transfer $190,000 to SG -97 -224,
pending approvals from the Legislative
Commission on Minnesota Resources.
• reviewed the Cooperator for Wilderness
Inquiry's 2001 LCMR Funding Request and
took the following action:
adopted a resolution supporting
Wilderness Inquiry's request for 2001
LCMR funding for accessibility surveys
of outdoor recreation facilities,
publishing a guide on the accessibility
of recreation facilities and training
public and private outdoor recreation
service providers on how to include
persons with disabilities into their
regular programs and services; and
2. authorized the Council's parks staff to
serve on a committee reviewing
Wilderness Inquiry's efforts, if funded,
and to make recommendations to the
Legislature on how to provide technical
assistance on accessibility in the future.
Transportation
• approved a change order for electrical repair
and construction for additional work done
beyond the original scope of work for the
Metro Transit Heywood Office renovation
project.
• approved reimbursement of eligible transit
.providers for their expenses related to transit
association membership dues effective
January 2000.
• adopted the Regional Transit Master Plan as
amended.
• approved a Transportation Advisory Board
request that one of their members be
appointed to serve as a non- voting member
of the Metropolitan Council's Transportation
Committee.
• approved the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities' appointment of North St. Paul
Page 4 January, 2000
,. 1�
1.'T
ME, ES
TR�O DI(i
Council Member Robert Bruton to the
Transportation Advisory Board with a term
ending January 2001.
• approved appointments to the Transportation
Advisory Board in Districts B, C, D, G as
well as the Chair, two representatives of mass
transit, one representative of the Freight
Industry and a representative of non -
motorized interests.
• amended its 2000 Capital Improvement
Program, adjusted the following
appropriations and authorized its Regional
Administrator to execute amendments to the
following contracts:
1. increased contract SG -99 -75 (305- 35541)
for the City of Maple Grove for the
purchase of three vans by $5,860.86 from
$120,000 to $125,860.86.
2, increased contract SG -98 -105 (305-
53419) for Minnesota Valley Transit
Authority for the purchase of two buses
by $27,400 from $548,000 to $575,400;
3. increased contract SG -99 -84 (305 -
35509) for the Minnesota Valley Transit
Authority for the purchase of four buses
by $48,400 from $968,000 to
$1,016,400;
4. reduced contract SG -98 -107 (305- 35421)
for the Minnesota Valley Transit .
Authority for the purchase of one small
bus by $7,200 from $62,000 to $54,800;
and
5. authorized a contract for $7,200 to the
Minnesota Valley Transit Authority for
the purchase of radio equipment for nine
buses.
Page 5
The Council Also:
• held a public hearing on affordable and life -
cycle housing goals.
• approved holding closed meetings of its
Management Committee to discuss labor
negotiation issues.
• approved holding closed meetings of its
Litigation Review Committee to discuss. .
pending and imminent litigation and
settlement issues. .
• reappointed Mr. Peter Enck for a Hill, three -
year term on the Family Housing Fund Board
of Directors.
• adopted resolutions recognizing the
contributions of those who ensured a
successful outcome to Y2K efforts and those
who have left the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services through voluntary
separation programs.
New Publications
Council publications are available from the
Council's Regional Data Center. For a free
and complete list of publications, write the
Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth
St., St. Paul, MN 55 10 1, or call (651) 602 -1140.
E -mail address is: data. center @nietc.state.nuz.its
There is a charge for some publications.
The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter
provides information on regional issues and
Council Programs. If you wish to subscribe to
Council Directions at no charge, call Dawn
Hoffner at (651) 602 -1447.
January, 2000
rf
ME J
AL-A\ W
Dl(iES
'T
Metropolitan Commission Activities
Metropolitan Airports Commission grant amendment requests as outlined on
page 4 of this publication.
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at
6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more • reviewed the Dakota County Master Plan
information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186.
and recommended that the Metropolitan
The Commission:. Council:
adopted Ordinance No. 85 which established
the commercial vehicle trip fee for vehicles
using the commercial roadway at MSP
International Airport at $2.03 per trip for the
period March 11, 2000 through March 10,
2001.
approved a new Airline Operating
Agreement and Terminal Building Lease
with airlines operating at Minneapolis -St.
Paul International Airport.
received the Distinguished Budget Award
presented by the Government Finance
Officers Association, which is based on
budget documents that serve as a policy
document, financial plan, operations guide
and Communication device.
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission (MP &OSC)
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are
located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul,
55101. For more information, call Ellie Bailey at (651)
602 -1312.
The Commission:
recommended that the Metropolitan Council
approve St. Paul's East Bank Mississippi
River Regional Corridor Master Plan as
outlined on page 3 of this publication.
• recommended that the Metropolitan Council
approve the Normandale Lake Bandshell
(SG -97 -224) and Path Lighting (SG- 98 -49)
1. approve the Mississippi River Regional
Trail, South Segment Master Plan;
request Dakota.County submit joint
powers agreements with Inver Grove
Heights and utility companies as
necessary for development and
operations of each trail section prior to
development; and
consider the trail portion within Spring
Lake Park Reserve to be part of the
master plan update and future
development of the park reserve for
consistency in regional funding.
recommended that the Metropolitan Council
amend the Big Rivers Regional Trail to
include the extension project, connection of
the existing Big Rivers Regional Trail to the
I -494 trail crossing, and reimburse Dakota
County $401,000 to match an ISTEA grant
of $700,000 per the 2000 -2001 Capital
Improvements Program, if funded.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
(MSFC)
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are
located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For
more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310.
The Commission's actions.forJanuaiy were not
available at press time. They will be included in
the February issue.
Page 6 January, 2000
MllftfesofaDepArtNeht of fl��ahR�ghts
February 3, 2000
Dear Local Elected Official:
The League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions and the Minnesota Department
of Human Rights have joined together to support local efforts to promote human rights
through a series of three regional "idea exchange" meetings to be held during 2000.
I am writing to urge you to attend one of these important events along with the
members of your local human rights commission. The first meeting will be held in the
metro area on March 25 in Golden Valley (a notice with more information is enclosed).
Two subsequent meetings are tentatively scheduled for the Red Wing and Brainerd
areas in May and June.
As envisioned in the Governor's Big Plan for Minnesota, through its Living Human
Rights.. and . Respect initiative, human rights commissions play a critical role in
maintaining vital_ communities in Minnesota. These meetings will provide community
leaders and commission members with practical ideas on how to implement local
human rights programs and activities, as well as the latest information on recent court
cases, legislation and social changes affecting human rights.
We need your support to make this effort a true "idea exchange." We encourage you to
share the human rights issues you have encountered in your community and successful
strategies you have used to address them. We would also appreciate your feedback
on how the League and the Department can better serve your community.
Thank you for supporting the work of your local human rights commission. We look
forward to seeing you at one of our regional meetings and wish you continued success
in your efforts to serve your community.
Enclosure
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Army Corps of Engineers Centre, 190 E. 5th Street Suite 700, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (651) 296 -5663 or (800) 657 -3704
MARK YOUR CALENDARS!!!
_EAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS and
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
First Regional Meeting -
IDEA EXCHANGE.
Saturday, March 25, 2000 9:_30 A.M. - 3:30 P.M.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
GOLDEN VALLEY CITY HALL
7800 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD (612- 593 -8000)
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427
(First of 3 Regional Meetings for theyear 2000)
TDEA EXCHANGES: -- Review and Update of State Human Rights Law, MD HR; -- Review.
tent Decisions Affecting Law, NIDHR; -- Working Effectively with City /County and Police,
LMHRC; -- Keeping In Touch with .our communities, LMHRC; -- Conducting Board
Meetings /Successful Public Meetings, MDHR/LMHRC; -- Programming with Schools, LMHRC;
- -Hate Crimes Response Plans, LMHRC; discuss hot Human rights issues, revitalize your
commission and more.
'CLE and CUE Accreditation Approval Pending.
Clip and Mail this portion along with Registration Fee to Marion Helland, Golden Valley HRC, 7720 Winnetka Heights Drive, Golden Valley, MN
55427.
Name
City
Organ izat ion/Aff i I iation
Special Accomodation or other
,native Format Needed
State Zip
Phone (Day) (Evening)
KINDLY INDICATE YOUR Luncheon Selection Regular Vegetarian
Please make. Checks Payable to "LMHRC" Registration Fee: $15.00 [includes coffee, rolls, lunch and
workshops] After March 3, Registration Fee is $25.00
lip t.:
"��`
Directions
from the southeast:
1-394 to north Hv6y 100 to west I-twy 55
to Rhode island Ave N. North on Rhode
Island to west Golden Wky Road
rant a entrance is to the north.•
from the southwest:
1 -394 to north Wy 169 to east Hwy 55
to Winnetka Ave. Nor th on WInnetke to
east Golden Valley Road. Pad&4 en-
trarnce Is to thz north.
from the northeast:
Hwy 100 to west Hwy S5 to Rhode
Island Ave N. North on,Rbode Island to
west Golden Wley kad• Parklrlg en-
trance Is to the north,
from the northwestt
i-Iwy 169 to east Flwy 55 to Vinnetka
Ave, North on W"tnnetka to east Golden
Valley. Road, Parking entrance is to the
north.
�='. -
1011h AVE N ty
vowde ®lAalnlanonts
Arai Menmw
- � PorklS�b eel
1Yeler Mablonenoa
Towor
Pubk
City 8sle(y
Hatt
GOB z
z
i Q Peal O
h
".r�'
t�y�y_, --ca
9O/ c
MEM
HWY
r
z
r�ns�e
O 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN ' 55447 O
City Hall and the Public Safety buildlffl ere both the Public Safety building houses the Police and
fully accessible facil ltle& rue Depar tments. Two additional Fine Statlorw are
located at ,3700 Golden Valley Read a11d 400
Cky Hall houses the City Council Chambers and a timers Crossroad S, For mortktferMi0on about
number of meeting rooms. It also houses the Public Safety, cap (612).593=8079,
Manager's, Planning, finance, Assesshig and
General Services, Inspections, 6n8ineerirg, and
Motor Whicle llcer%dM Departments. For more
information about City Hail or fornumbers to
specific departments, call (612) 593 -8000•
Other buildings on the campu
varlous Public Works departrr
and Street Maintenance,
and Utilitles Maintenance. Far
about Public Works, call (61 t
house the
nts, including Perk
ore inWnnatlon
593 -8030
EDINA BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
February 3, 2000
Members of the Edina City Council
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, MN.55424
Members of.the. Edina Board of Education.
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposed Project for adding to and improving recreational
facilities in Edina
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Edina Basketball Association (the "EBA ") to express
to you our support for a proposal which you are currently considering to add additional
recreational facilities and improve existing recreational facilities in Edina.
The EBA is a tax - exempt, nonprofit organization whose mission is to provide
recreational opportunities in the sport of basketball to students in the Edina community. I have
attached to this letter a list showing community participation for the 1999 -2000 season. We have
approximately 1,110 student participants in grades 1 -9 in both house league and traveling
programs. We have 35 board members, all of whom live in Edina. We also have approximately
200 coaches, most of whom are Edina volunteer parents.
We believe that sports are, an important part of the overall community experience for our
children and for the families in our community. Children, are exposed to team concepts and meet
other children from all over our community. We believe that our program, run in conjunction,
with the Edina Park and Recreation Department, helps build a strong bond among community
members, including parents, children and coaches. Through our skills and drills program, Edina
high school players work with younger children in the community to develop their skills. This is
a great opportunity for our high school kids to give something back to the community. The
younger children really enjoy meeting with and working with the "big kids ".
We believe that the expansion of gym facilities, along with the improvement of some of
our existing facilities, is extremely important, in order to continue and enhance our program and
the programs of other sports. In basketball, we have seen a significant increase in the number of
participants. We are working hard to provide more and better opportunities to children in our
1a
Members of the Edina City Council
Members of the Edina Board of Education
February 3, 2000
Page 2
community. Expanding the gym facilities at the Community Center and enhancing some of our
existing gym facilities would, give us the ability to schedule more games and practices and
provide more programs such as our skills and drills program. In addition, it would allow us to
provide more open gym time for members of the community, especially over the winter school
break. As our program has grown, and as programs for girls basketball and other sports have
grown, scheduling has become more difficult and we have not been able to offer as many events
(practices, games and training programs) as we would like. We believe that the expansion of the
gym facilities, and the improvement of existing facilities, would allow athletic programs to
expand and would result in year round use of the facilities by basketball and other sports. As
evidenced by the significant participation in our program, we believe that the additional and
enhanced facilities would be used by a significant number of members of our community, and
thus would be an important, worthwhile investment in our community. Edina is second to none
in producing future leaders in many fields, including-business, government, education and the
arts. We think that the opportunity to be a part of a team, to interact with a coach, and to get to
know others in the community is an important part of that development.
We offer our support of this project in any way that you feel would be appropriate.
Certainly, our board members would be eager to work to support the project. We are a nonprofit
organization, and are supported largely by registration fees from participants. We would,
however, be willing to consider continuing support after completion of the project in terms of
some level of support of operating expenses.
Thank you very much for your consideration. I would be happy to meet with any of you
with respect to any questions or concerns you may have, as would other members of the EBA
board.
Sincerely,
Neil A. Weikart, President
Edina Basketball Association
naw /sd
::ODM A\PCDOCS\FBDOCS 1 \2344561 \1
attachment
cc:' Dennis Maetzold, Mayor
Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent
John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation Department
EBA Board
IM
1999 -2000
EDINA BASKETBALL PARTICIPATION
House League
Grade
Number of Players
Number of Teams . . .
1 & 2na
330
40
3rd
190
20
4th
150
16
5th
100
10
61h
65
7
71n & 81h
115
14
gin
40
4
Totals
990
111
Traveling
Grade
Number of Players
Number of Teams
5
30
3
On
30
3
71H
30
3
8th
30
3
Totals
120
12
Overall Totals 1 1,110 1 123
• Number of community members (mainly parents and some senior high school students) who
coach — approximately 200
• Number of EBA board members -- 35
::ODMATCDOCS\FBDOCS 1 \2344530\1
January 19, 2000
Ken Dragseth
6904 Antrim Road
Edina, M.ti` 55439
Dear Ken:
Through "Edina 20/20 Vision," the strategic planning process in which you have been involved, the City
Council and I recently drafted the first version of new vision and mission statements for the City. Based on
the feedback we received from you and others, we see the Edina of tomorrow as being "the preeminent
place for living, learning, raising families and doing business."
The City values your opinion. Because you have cont6buted to this exciting process, please read the
attached statements and let us know what you tl'dnk. We believe that many of the critical issues facing the
City will be resolved as part of Edina 20/20 Vision. Having input from you and other residents and
businesspeople will significantly enhance our chances of success. Please send your comments to me at
Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MIN 55424.
After we receive feedback on the vision and mission statements, our next step in the process will be
holding another public meeting where we will begin setting three- to five -year goals for the City. We plan
to have that meeting sometime in the next few months.
Thank you for your continued involvement in this important effort. I look forward to reading your
comments.
fSincerely,
�J
7-
Dennis F. Maetzold l
Mayor /� `,�
Enclosure (1)
... .. . -.,.. ._ .. y, _. :I�.( //� ,. f```�������_`', .��v///VVVVVV /, 'ii 'T :,`['•� - .r ,..
(612) 927 -8861
FAX (612) 826 -0390
TDD (612) 826 -0379
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET'
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 :
„]�o n,� , �u 144w J kve aq t,-n
41 144X_
C &WMM �
C 1 T Y O F E D 1 N
edi n a ISIOn
I N N E Y O T A
DRAFT
Nu Yt
�Th� wu • MISSION AND VISION V _ v
OUR MISSIONV1
The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain
a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and�l.S
redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner which sustains and improves the��
uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.
OUR VISION FOR 2020
Edina is the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business
distinguished by:
A Livable Environment. Our residents regard their quality of life in Edina as very high. Many
factors contribute to this opinion, including premier schools, exceptional neighborhoods, an
advantageous location in the metropolitan area, excellent public facilities and services, safe streets,
a clean and adequate water supply and a strong sense of community identity.
Effective and Valued City Services. Our customers (we view our residents and businesses as
customers as well as taxpayers) have an extraordinarily high regard for city services. They
associate an outstanding value with these services. They also distinguish Edina from other places
by the quality of our services. These services change as the needs of our customers change, but
their effectiveness and value will be the benchmarks of our success.
A Sound Public Infrastructure. Edina streets, utilities, parks and public buildings are the
essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the
development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality
that Edina has and will enjoy.
A Balance of Land Uses. Edina is a model of urban development: a diversity of land uses,
housing choices for all stages of a person's life, outstanding neighborhoods and an extensive
network of parks and open spaces all arranged in a manner of development that is pedestrian- and
transit- friendly. It also includes access to new technology and communications systems, the
employment of reinvestment and redevelopment strategies to address new housing and business
needs and prudent policies that sustain Edina's enormous investment in its housing stock and
neighborhoods.
Innovation. "Innovation” means risk - taking. "Innovation" means matching our technological
resources with the needs and desires of our residents. "Innovation" means creating value in what
we do to serve our citizens. "Innovation" means operating local government in a business -like
manner even though we are not a business. "Innovation" means forging partnerships with our
schools, community organizations and volunteers to serve our customers. Although our residents
are highly satisfied with their community, we always seek innovative ways to improve their lives.
�ZD G�iUH�i �rl/L"
, /V%/U `_5
1; 'k y, 0f -EL d i T i a
January 19, 2000
Tom Erickson
6004 A;_.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Tom:
Through "Edina 20/20 Vision," the strategic planning process in which you have been involved, the City
Council and I recently drafted the first version of new vision and mission statements for the City. Based on
the feedback we received from you and others, we see the Edina of tomorrow as being "the preeminent
place for living, learning, raising families and doing business."
The City values your opinion. Because you have contributed to this exciting process, please read the
attached statements and let us know what you think. We believe that many of the critical issues facing the
City will be resolved as part of Edina 20/20 Vision. Having input from you and other residents and
businesspeople will significantly enhance our chances of success. Please send your comments to me at
Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424.
After we receive feedback on the vision and mission statements, our next step in the process will be
holding another public meeting where we will begin setting three- to five -year goals for the City. We plan
to have that meeting sometime in the next few months.
Thank you for your continued involvement in this important effort. I look forward to reading your
comments.
Sincerely,
Dennis F. Maetzold
Mayor
Enclosurq (1:)
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394
-fie " c- c^'1-- /�^�.�•� �G- �.�.�:�. - �a,. -F .y +r� iC-e,— .
(612) 927 -8861
FAX (612) 826 -0390
y —v o TDD (612) 826 -0379
/- �
January 19, 2000
Paul Hamann
4700 Aspasia Circle
Edina, NIN 55435.
Dear Paul:
Through "Edina 20/20 Vision," the strategic planning process in which you have been involved, the City
Council and I recently drafted the first version of new vision and mission statements for the City. Based on
the feedback we received from you and others, we see the Edina of tomorrow as being "the preeminent
place for living, learning, raising families and doing business."
The City values your opinion. Because you have contributed to this exciting process, please read the
attached statements and let us know what you think. We believe that many of the critical issues facing the
City will be resolved as part of Edina 20/20 Vision_ Having input from you and other residents and
businesspeople will significantly enhance our chances of success. Please send your comments to me at
Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424.
After we receive feedback on the vision and mission statements, our next step in the process will be
holding another public meeting where we will begin setting three- to five -year goals for the City. We plan
to have that meeting sometime in the next few months.
Thank you for your continued involvement in this important effort. I look forward to reading your
comments.
Sincerely,
Dennis F. Maetzold
Mayor
Enclosure (1) ' .
s-
-
' .... Jc, "- ... -• _Y? 1::.J11 - SG:'(y) ` -;L., a!�' •'i.'.° V,'�.•. P. �.'.: .T.'s 1. - �_ '
`a
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
C 1 T Y O F E D 1 N A
�d27iS 20,
ina I O r
M I N N E 8 0 T A U S A
MISSION AND VISION
OUR MISSION
J;., s '
The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain
a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and
redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner which sustains and improves the
uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.
OUR VISION FOR 2020�.� ���
Edina is the preeminent. plachor living, learning, raising families and doing business
ti^ distin wished by:
ale Environment. Our residents regard their quality of life in Edina as very high. Many
o factors contribute to this opinion, including premier schools, exceptional neighborhoods, an
advantageous location in the metropolitan area, excellent public facilities and services, safe streets,
a clean and adequate water supply and a strong sense of coTJU� id�eyn�ti
Effective and Valued City Services. Our customerq(
have an extraordinarily high regard for city services. They.
associate an outstanding value with these services. They also distinguish Edina from other places
by the quality of our services. These services change as the needs of our customers change, but
their effectiveness and value will be the benchmarks of our success.
A Sound Public Infrastructure. Edina streets, utilities, parks and public buildings are the
essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the
development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality
that Edina has and will enjoy.
AA B lance of Land Uses. Edina is a model of urban development: a diversity of land uses,
housing choices for all stages of a person's life, outstanding neighborhoods and an extensive`
g
network of arks and open spaces all arranged in a manner of development that is pedestrian- and,
transit- friendly. also includestaacccess to new technolosY and communications system e �N�
„ Hof reinvestment and redevelopment strategies to address housing and business d� V
needs and prudent policies that sustain Edina's enormous investment in its housing stock and
neighborhoods.
Innovation. "Innovation" mea isk -takin "Innovation" means matching our technological
resources with the needs and desires o our residents. "]nn ovation" means creating value in what
we do to serve our citizens. "Innovation" means operating local government in a business -like
manner even though we are not a business. "Innovation" means forging partnerships with our
schools, community organizations and volunteers to serve our customers. Although our residents
are highly satisfied with their community, we always seek innovative ways to improve their lives.
C 1 T Y O P E D 1 N A
20
edinaV S I O n
M I N N ! B O T A U S A
MISSION AND VISION
OUR MISSION
1.,.�� •SY .��
:r
The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective and valued, public services, maintain
a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and G
redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner which sustains and improves the
uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.
OUR VISION FOR 2020
Edina is the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business
distinguished by:
A Livable Environment. Our residents regard their quality of life in Edina as very high. Many
factors contribute to this opinion, including premier schools, exceptional neighborhoods, an &oil
advantageous location in the metropolitan area, excellent public facilities and services, safe streets,
a I clean and adequate water supply and a strong sense of community identity.
Effective and Valued City Services. Our customers (we view our residents and businesses as
customers as well as taxpayers) have an extraordinarily high regard for city services. They
associate an outstanding value with these, services. They also distinguish Edina from other places
by the quality of our services. These services change as the needs of our customers change, but
their effectiveness and value will be the benchmarks of our success.
A Sound Public Infrastructure. Edina streets; utilities, parks and public buildings are the
essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the
development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality
that Edina has and will enjoy.
A Balance of Land Uses. Edina is a model of urban development: a diversity of land uses,
housing choices for all stages of a person's life, outstanding neighborhoods and an extensive
network of parks and open spaces all arranged in a manner of development that is pedestrian- and
transit- friendly. It also includes access to new technology and communications systems, the
employment of reinvestment and redevelopment strategies to address new housing and business
needs and prudent policies that sustain Edina's enormous investment in its housing stock and
neighborhoods.
Innovation. "Innovation" means risk - taking. "Innovation" means matching our technological
resources with the needs and desires of our residents. "Innovation" means creating value in what
we do to serve our citizens. "Innovation" means operating local government in a business -like
manner even though we are riot a business. "Innovation" means forging partnerships with our
schools, community organizations and volunteers to serve our customers. Although our residents
are highly satisfied with their community, we always seek innovative ways to improve their lives.
Ll, v�
LC
4 &ND!
�d9-
S.L-Jljfj�A k:�-u 1 .0 —wwvxa_ --A
1\0 Q.
�-A\
1titiT 0 S
A s
L
V-Lq— 7-0
A
YACAvk
�a ���� \ A&
January 26, 2000
Mayor Dennis F. Maetzold
City Hall
4801 W. 5& St.
Edina, MN .55424 -1394
Dear Denny:
I have read the draft "Mission and Vision" statement for the "Edina 20/20 Vision"
project.
It all sounds wonderful —"the devil is in the details!" However, as we look ahead 20
years, it seems to me that it should somehow address the ultimate need for
redevelopment. As our community ages another 20 years, I can't help but think there will
be neighborhoods (yes, residential, commercial, and industrial) that will become
physically and/or functionally obsolete. Public /private partnerships will be required to
address these issues /areas lest they grow and fester.
The Mission Statement pays lip service to the issue: " ... and guide development and
redevelopment of lands ..." but the "Our Vision for 2020" is silent on the issue.
Richfield almost waited too long to address the problems of post World War I housing
and commercial patterns of development. As you know, they are now aggressively
proceeding to redevelop large areas of the city in order to stem the spread of decay and
declining property values. All first tier suburbs of Minneapolis are going to face these
problems in the relatively near future.
we should acknowledge it now — in the "Vision."
Peter. E. Jarvis
Partner
Laukka - Jarvis, Inc.
Laukka I JaI-%,is. Inc.
Phone 1 612. 896. 1971
3300 Edinborough Way Suite 201 Fax 612. 896. 1 19'2
Edina. Mn 55435
Edina Gators Swim Club
MEMO
Date: January 31, 2000
To: The Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council
Subject: New Pool
Mr. Mayor and Council Members,
We are contacting you to request the inclusion of funds for anew, swimming pool as
part of the upcoming spring sports referendum. The need for a new swimming facility
in Edina is pressing for a variety of reasons:
• Age of existing facilities.
• Competitive limitations caused by five lane pool configuration
• Potential liability issues
• Inadequacies of current facilities for practices
• Number of swimmers vying for pool time
The Southview pool was built in 1958 and the Valley View pool was built in 1964,
this means that Edina's newest indoor competitive pool facility is ,35 years -QJA. The
members of the Edina High School Girls Swimming & Diving Team, the Edina High
School Synchronized Swimming Team, the Edina High School Boys Swimming &
Diving Team, the Community Education Swimming Programs, the Edina Masters
Swimming Program and the Edina Swim Club all use the above facilities. This is a
total of approximately 400 swimmers competing for space in just two five lane pools.
It means that swimmers as young as ten years old are swimming until nine at night and
that is unacceptable.
In addition, because Edina has just a five lane pool it means that the Edina High
School Boys and Girls Swim Teams are handicapped in their own facility. High
School rules allow for swimming up to three swimmers against three swimmers. With
Edina's traditional depth, this means that swimming only two on, Edina has no "home
field advantage." It would be similar to playing hockey with four on four players on a
smaller rink. Edina High School is one of two schools in the Classic Lake Conference
that has a five lane pool. The lack of a larger facility means that Edina can not host an
invitational meet or sectional meet. Hosting these kinds of meets brings prestige to
the school and can be a very effective fund raising event for the teams. Traditionally,
swimming has been a strong contributor to Edina's ninety nine total State
Championships, this tradition should continue.
•4445 West 77th St., Suite 240-Edina, Minnesota 55435.612 831- 3814•Fax: 612 841 -1822•
Memo to Edina Mayor & City Council - Page 2
There are also potentially libelous issues in regard to the existing facilities. Diving
_.requirements have already made the Southview pool obsolete for training and
competition and the Valley View pool may also be obsolete for diving if depth
requirements are changed. Swim start requirements have also changed from 3' 6" to
4'. This means starts can only be practiced at one end of the pool and a start from the
3 6" depth could lead to an injury. Last year, at the outdoor pool (3' 6 "), a child hit
the bottom and split open his nose.
The Edina High School Synchronized Swim Team can not hold a full practice because
the pools are too shallow. The Edina Swim Club must lease pool space from Blake
School (paying Blake over $12,000 per year for this privilege) and has been forced to
turn away new members at its Fall Splash Night because the demand is so great on
existing Edina facilities. Entry level programs, like those offered by Edina Swim
Club, feed the Edina High School program. With the addition of more pool space in
Edina, this program would grow substantially, perhaps even double in size. Further,
the stroke techniques and athletic endurance stressed in competitive swimming, spill
over to performance in other sports.
Our proposal to the Mayor and City Council is to include funds in the spring sports
referendum for building an eight lane, 25 yard, deep water, cool water, competitive
pool with separate diving well. This pool could be built on the grounds between
Valley View Junior High and Edina High School. An eight lane competitively
designed pool would allow Edina to host invitational and sectional meets, hold joint
varsity and junior varsity practices and allow the synchronized swim team to hold full
practices. By making the diving well separate, diving liability issues can be addressed
separately, and more cost efficiently. This new facility would also ease the pressure on
existing facilities, allow more Edina children to swim and provide reasonable practice
times for younger children.
Building this facility would allow the current needs of all Edina swimmers to be met
and prepare the city to meet the needs of future swimmers.
Respectfully Submitted,
Tim Moodie
President - Edina Swim Club
cc: School Board Members
Action Forum at Edina City Hall for Changing Faces, Changing Communities Reporting
An Action Forum during which decision makers in the Edina community may learn the
findings of the Changing Faces, Changing Communities discussions will take place on
March 23, Thursday evening at 7 P.M. in the Edina City Hall, City Council Chambers.
There will also a state Action Forum on Saturday, April 29 12:30 -5 PM at the MN
History Center.
Sixty -five participants at the February 8 Tuesday evening Opening Conversations
launched a series of discussion groups continuing for the next four weeks. Small groups
meet in room 332 of the Edina Community Center on Tuesday evenings February 22, 29,
and March 7 at 7 P.M.; Friday mornings, February 18, 25, and March 3 from 9:30- 11:30;
and Saturdays mornings February 12, 19, 26, and March 4 from 9:30 - 11:30. Individuals
may still register by calling 612 - 944 -1229. A trained facilitator and the Changing Faces,
Changing Communities discussion guide assist these exciting community circle
discussions of "What does it mean to be an American in the current age of immigration.
Fifty some individuals are registered for these small groups.
Opening Conversations will be televised on
Time Warner Community Access Cable - Channel 15
February 12 - 8:00 P.M:
February 19 - 7:301P.M.
February 26 - 7:30 P.M.
March 1 - 8:00 P.M.
The League of Women Voters of Minnesota has initiated this statewide community
circle discussion series. It is co- sponsored in Edina by Edina Community Education;
endorsed by the Edina Human Relations Commission; and funded by the League of
Women Voters of Minnesota Education Fund and the Edina Foundation.